,:--'•«' <;' ,- - FROM THE INCOME OF THE FISKE ENDOWMENT FUND THE BEQUEST OF lyibrarian of the University 1868-1883 1905 ^H__ w The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924091761464 This large paper Edition of the Feudal History of the County of Derby " is limited to 50 Copies. No.38 . ''^-'J e^ -^- ^--Kj THE Jfeubal Distorip OF THE COUNTY OF DERBY. THE FEUDAL HISTORY OF THE County of 2)erb?: {Chiefly during the nth, I2th, and l^th Centuries,) BY JOHN P Y M _X-E ATMAN, ESQ., {Of LhicoMs Inn, Barrister-at-Law^ formerly of Emmamtel College, Cambridge^ and F.R.H.S,, &^c.) Author of "The Early Genealogical History of the House of Arundel;" "The History of the Common Law ok Great Britain and Gaul;" "An Introduction to the Study OF Early English History;" " The Mayor's Court Act, 1857 ;" "An Introduction TO THE History of the House of Glanville;" "A Treatise on the Law of Trades Marks;" "The Origin of the Nations of Western Europe;" "The Records of Ches- terfield;" "A Treatise on the Law of Ancient Demesne;" "An Exposure of the "Mismanagement of the Public Record Office," &c., &c. AND BY SIR GEO. R. SITWELL, BART, M.P., F.S.A., Joint Editor of the Hundred of Scarsdaie ; AND CECIL J. S. FOLJAMBE, ESQ., M.P., F.SA., Joint Editor of the Hundred of High Peak. VOL. I. Xon5on : BEMROSE & SONS, 23, OLD BAILEY; AND DERBY. LONDON AND OXFORD: PARKER & Co. CHESTERFIELD: WILFRED EDMUNDS, "DERBYSHIRE TIMES." feV TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE EDWARD HENRY, jfifteentb Earl of Derbg, KNIGHT OF THE GARTER, AND A PRIVY COUNCILLOR, BARON STANLEY OF BICKERSTAFFE, AND A BARONET, WITH MANY OTHER TITLES TO GENERAL ESTEEM, THIS HISTORY OF THE COUNTY OF DERBY, BY HIS lordship's PERMISSION, IS MOST RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED. PREFACE T N issuing the first section of this work, the Author feels -*- that it is necessary to give some explanation to those who are looking for a County History written in the usual manner. To the student of history and genealogy no apology is necessary for somewhat departing from it, because the contents of this portion will be to him of far greater value than the most elaborately worked-out account of any single parish. There are, of course, many chances to one that any particular portion of the work pourtrayed will not be of great importance to a general student ; but everyone interested in the County History of Derbyshire, or of the neighbouring counties, will here find something to aid him in his research. If it seem dry to one set of readers, it will be of the deepest interest to another. No doubt Derbyshire Antiquarians ought to have published this matter in another shape. Major-General the Honble. G. Wrottesley, through the William Salt Society, has done this work admirably for Staffordshire ; and whoever undertakes to write the History for that County, will find it ready to his hand. But no such aid exists for a writer, or for his readers, as regards this County ; while it is absolutely essential to the right understanding of an account of the devolution of viii PREFACE. estates, and the true history of families, to be able to turn to a record of this kind ; to test, explain, and account for the peculiarities and various accidents of the descent of land. Derbyshire is fortunate in having had Domesday carefully and ably edited by Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt ; and the Author had some thought of proceeding, without again printing it. But, for anyone desirous of ascertaining the correctness of the views stated in the work, it is absolutely necessary to have Domesday at hand to refer to ; and very possibly it would be difficult for most readers to gain access to it, and many would, therefore, be glad to have a copy of it for reference. He has therefore contented himself with giving a translation, and a slight analysis of its contents, with a few lists of first importance — the names of Manors of Ancient Demesne of the Crown ; and of all those Manors and Berewics which are recorded in Domesday. Scholars who require to see the account in its original Latin, must have recourse to Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt's work, or to Domesday itself The Author has given an account of the direct objects of the extracts from the Pipe Rolls in Chapter II., at page 85, but perhaps he has not sufficiently stated his motive for printing them. The next Section (No. II.) will be chiefly occupied with a series of most valuable Records, which illu.s- trate, and should be read in connection with, Domesday. They are extracts from the " Red Book," the " Testa de Nevil," the " Book of Aids," and " Kirkby's Quest ; " with lists of tenants of Manors from the earliest period to latest procurable, most of which are undated ; and it is only by collating them with the Pipe Rolls, here published for this express purpose, that their lise and proper value can be ascertained. The Pipe Rolls not only supply the chronology which gives life and spirit to those dry bones, but give the explanation, in a large number of cases, of those puzzling facts of County History PREFACE. ix which have produced, for Derbyshire readers, so much unhappy- guesswork, and too frequently such deplorable blundering. Derbyshire Historians have used the records, or some of them, which will be given in Section II., but without the aid of the Pipe Rolls, and hence their work has been laid upon a false basis, and without any true chronology. It is to avoid a repetition of their mistakes, to point them out, and to correct them, that these records are here printed. They will serve, not only to correct former writers, but also the Author ; and they give to the reader engaged in this research the opportunity of doing so for himself The great object to be attained in a work of this kind is the Truth. To give honour where honour is due, although, in the process, it may be necessary to strip those, who wear them, of their borrowed plumes. This will be done in no carping or malicious spirit, but in one of justice to all. No one has a right to arrogate for himself, or his family, honours which do not rightly belong to them ; and it is difficult to conceive how any honourable man, any right- minded person, can object to this course. Far better is -it that the truth should be known, and the real history of a family be given ; than that any stock, however great and distinguished it may now be, should usurp the place of the descendants of another, and perhaps a greater family. Perchance, some, in their anxiety to boast of a Norman descent, end by discarding one that is higher, and more important to English- men because it is their own. They who have studied minutely the history of the tenth and eleventh centuries, are aware that many families of the best blood, both of Norman, Breton, and English families, are to be found settled in England, in which — according to the crude theories of our modern historians — only a people they miscall the Anglo - Saxons, lived prior to the Conquest, and even this nation they pretend to think was swept away. It is X PREFACE. generally admitted that amongst the first Norman invaders, and chief amongst them are to be found, far too often, the veriest scum of the earth — the refuse ot the various nations of the continent. Younger sons of good families came over twenty years later, when the Conquest of England was assured. Ordericus, who lived a generation later, has made himself merry with the ridiculous affectation of some of these Norman lords, who, by virtue of their new pos- sessions, pretended an equality in ranl< with the men whose property they had usurped, and whose places they now filled. Amongst the very men who incurred his just censure are some who settled in this County, whom our ignorant, and too often complaisant heralds have appropriated as the parent stock of some of our greatest families ; whilst others of the names amongst them, however proudly worn now, betray, in their etymology, the base origin of those who bore them. But, even supposing that every adventurer, who, with the hope of plunder, joined the ancient nobility of Brittany and Normandy in their efforts to recover for the Duke of Normandy his disputed inheritance, was of the highest rank ; only a very poor and mean creature would ignore his own ancestors in order to attach himself im- properly to the skirts of greater men, whose retainer h6 might be, although nothing akin in blood. What a paltry feeling it is, alas not yet wholly extinct, to be ashamed of one's own forefathers ! Even if their position was humble, they might be far more noble in mind and well-deserving than the greedy courtiers or dissolute noblemen whose names are now so highly coveted. I venture to assert, that there are numbers of true descen- dants of the ancient Thanes of England still living in Derbyshire. Many are unnoticed in Domesday because they kept away during this troublous period, but they or their descendants would return eventually, as we find from PREFACE. xi the records of the Law Courts ; and some of the greatest names in England are recorded as Derbyshire landowners at page 72. Twenty lesser Thanes, who remained after the Conquest, holding direct of the King, are enumerated at page 79. Whilst numbers of them appear in Domesday, and the Pipe Rolls, as holding in subjection to the Norman lords. It should be a source of legitimate pride to any one to trace his descent from these Englishmen. With care and patience, it may be shown that a large proportion of the people of Derbyshire are of the primitive native race, not Anglo-Saxons, for, as modern historians contend, that name does not combine two peoples, but is an absurd jumble, the concoction of Archbishop Parker, combining the native with the foreign name of the same people. Besides that, it is far too vague and general to give any indication of the true nationality of the race. The attempt of the author to give an historical account of the natives of this county will be reserved' to the com- pletion of the work ; when a sounder conclusion may be hoped for than at present. For it is not only from the etymology of the names of persons, of places, and 01 things, that a correct view can be obtained, but most especially from a complete survey of the primitive customs of the people ; which can only be gleaned by a patient winnowing of the whole facts which have been handed down to us by tradition ; from traces to be discovered and gathered from many an ancient charter and local custom, more pregnant with fact than even place-names, and frequently giving more precise and definite details. A County history based on these lines, if properly written, may be a valuable contribution to national history, and possess a more than local interest ; for it seldom happens that the customs and details brought to light were in use only in the locality in which they were discovered. More frequently they are but xii PREFACE. a type of what existed all over the land ; and the historian of the future who shall give us a true conception of English History, will gladly avail himself of the facts to be derived from the traditions of a single village. Historians ought not to draw upon their imagination for their facts, or at best give a gloss upon the prejudices and preconceived ideas of their fore-runners. History must be patiently built up from facts, such as those of which our original records give evidence, if not in their entirety and fullness, at least in their germ and inception. In order to trace the descent of the families knightly and yeoman of the county properly, one must proceed by steps, taking Domesday as the foundation, and then, by the aid of the Records which will appear in Section II., enlightened and explained by extracts from the Pipe Rolls, gradually deduce the history of the Manor and of the family. It is a work of great labour and difiSculty, but it possesses intense interest to one versed in these studies ; and that it is worthy of the effort to accomplish it, every candid mind will readily acknowledge. In his endeavours to do this, the author has been much cheered by the aid and encouragement which has been already accorded to him. He had been advised (even by his publishers) to wait till he was secured from loss by a sufficient subscription list ; but the fate of abler men than himself, who have taken this course, has warned him of its dangers ; and he prefers the bolder, and, he hopes, not less safe course of doing something towards the completion of the work; trusting that, as he proceeds, many who possess records of the past will give the public the benefit of them, and a full measure of support to the author. He has now thankfully to acknowledge the assistance of Sir George Reresby Sitwell, Bart, M.P., to whom he is indebted for much valuable genealogical information, as PREFACE. xiii well as for access to his private Records. When well in the saddle in his own work, he found that, apart from him, but upon much the same lines, Sir George Sitwell was collecting materials for a History of the Hundred of Scarsdale, which is practically that of the whole County, since it contains, amongst its proprietors, nearly all, if not all, of the great families, and consequently nearly all their retainers, and the bulk of the progenitors of the present yeoman families of the County. Until informed of this, the Author was unaware that any- one else had any thought of producing a work upon this County ; although he has since learnt, indeed since the bulk of this Preface was in type, that another Derbyshire Historian, of well-merited reputation, has only deferred for a time the realization of the publication of a County History, which he fully announced many years since, and which, it is very greatly to be hoped, he will eventually accomplish. It is only right to notice this latter fact, since the Author has unwittingly proclaimed that he was the only worker now in this field of literature. Sir George Sitwell met the Author in the most generous manner, and, rather than allow his projected work to interfere with this, he proposed to unite in editing the Hundred of Scarsdale. The Author's collection of facts is chiefly drawn from the Public Records, together with a mine of wealth, never before explored, drawn from Repositories abroad, and from the Muniment rooms of many private persons, to some of which no historian has hitherto had access ; whilst the main part of Sir George Sitwell's facts are derived from Court Rolls and Charters deposited in his own Muniment room, and those of other great landowners, the common ground between them being the great collections of previous writers which are deposited in the British Museum, and other public repositories, open to be drawn upon alike for the benefit of all. xiv PREFACE. Comparing the result of their separate labours, it was found that each had especially devoted his labours to particular portions of the County ; and although on many points in agreement, in certain others of the unsolved problems of Derbyshire History, a certain diversity of views existed. As it would be fair to neither to publish only one view of the case, when both might perhaps contain something of the truth, it has been arranged that whenever a divergence of views exists, each editor shall publish his own version ; and so that no confusion shall arise, each will initial his separate work relating to that part where the other has undertaken to write the account, and so preserve his own individuality, whilst protecting himself from responsibilitj' for ideas he does not countenance. And to those who know the manifold difficulties surrounding some of the abstruse problems of County History, this plan will have a great advantage, since it will afford a test to apply in the solution of any im- perfectly worked out idea, and at all events show the authority for the view presented. For the present section, Sir George Sitwell has incurred no responsibility ; nor will he commence his portion of the responsibility for the Hundred of Scarsdale until, in their order, those Parishes upon which he has laboured will appear. Sir George Sitwell will write the accounts of Eckington, Barlborough, Killamarsh, Beighton, Ashover, Pleslie, Brampton, and of many other places ; any special portions for which he will not be responsible will be initialed by the Author. The Author will be solely responsible, amongst other places, for the account of Alfreton and Norton, Beauchief, Dronfield, Hardwick, Hucknal, Steynesby, Brimington, Whittington, Wal- ton, and Chesterfield, for which places he has a very valuable collection of records, the collection of which, indeed, first inspired the idea of writing a History of this County. PREFACE. XV The History of the early Lords of Alfreton has for many years been a favourite study, and in his " History of the House of Arundel," and other works, the Author has con- tributed many facts concerning them, not only with regard to the history of Roger de Busli, the superior Lord of the time of Domesday, but of that of his great tenant Ingelram, whose Barony is now in abeyance between the family of the Earl of Derby, representing the co-heir, who married Robert de Lathom, and that of de Cadurcis, or Chaworth. This pedigree of Ingelram of Alfreton is a remarkable instance in proof of the superficial manner in which the History of this County has been treated, and of the want for one properly considered. Many Derbyshire and Notting- ham historians have necessarily referred to Ingelram and his descendants, since they held a leading position in the County for at least a century after the Conquest, three, if not four, of them being sheriffs in succession. Derbyshire owes to the ■piety of his grandson her most beautiful and once most powerful Abbey — Beauchief — founded in honour of the great St. Thomas a Becket, and even this has caused no enquiry into their history. Indeed, many writers have confounded this lord with the son of one of the greatest miscreants of the period, with Robert fitz Ranulf de Broc, who, with his father, was the chief instigator of the foul murder of the Archbishop, a view which was oddly enough countenanced by that eminent scholar, the late Dean Stanley, who, with his family, have now the Singular honour to represent this same Ingelram of Alfreton. It is dangerous to make a positive statement, considering the still very unsatisfactory condition of the history of the families of Roger de Busli and of the Earls of Ewe. The doubts concerning both have rather been increased than allayed, by the recent interesting and suggestive sketch of that very learned but too positive writer, Mr. Chester xvi PREFACE. Waters, but it may be positively asserted that Ingelram was a cadet of one, and more probably of both of them, for Roger de Busli most probably was himself a scion of the House of Ewe, his feudal lords. His only daughter and eventual heiress married the eldest son of the Earl, who succeeded to the title, and Ingelram was the name of their younger son, who was known to be in England in IIIO, but whose subsequent history is lost. Henry I. robbed both the families of their inheritance, and therefore it was probably as some kind of compensation that to Ingelram of Alfreton, whatever was his exact rela- tionship to the Earl, was given the high office — the here- ditary sheriffdom of these counties — quite out of proportion to his territorial position within them. To those who know the difficulties of writing a satisfactory history of a county in these days, when a multitude of records are open to the historian, which in former times were either neglected, misunderstood, or unknown, the divi- sion of the labour will appear quite natural, and very beneficial. And so grateful was the Author for the proposed help of Sir George Sitwell, that he applied to Mr. Cecil J. S. Foljambe, M.P., who has for many years studied the History of the High Peak, and who has already supplied much very valuable information relating to that district, to join him in co-editing it, to which appeal he has most kindly responded, and the Author has also great hopes of obtaining similar aid, although he is not yet in a position to announce particulars, for other Hundreds of the County ; indeed, the proportions of much of the future portions of the work will depend upon the reception accorded to the Hundreds of Scarsdale and High Peak. In order properly to write the history of the County, research must be made, and has been made, into the history PREFACE. xvii of many others, and not only must the records of this country be carefully examined, but the treasures of many local reposi- tories in Normandy, especially in the Cotentin (the cradle of so many English families), and also in Brittany, whilst all the public libraries of France, especially of Paris and Rouen, of Austria and parts of Germany, of Italy and of Rome, must be, and have been, consulted ; and as fresh light is being continually obtained from most unexpected sources, recourse must be had to these again and again if the work is to be properly carried out, and this cannot be done without a considerable expenditure of time and money. If the first portion of this work meets with a 'favourable recep- tion, it will resolutely and honestly be carried out to the end, and of failure of this support, judging from the present, there is not the slightest reason to apprehend. It is difficult properly to acknowledge the encouraging help already given. The author is very deeply indebted to Mr. Cecil G. S. Foljambe, M.P., for having obtained for him access to various Muniment rooms, more especially to the magnificent collec- tion of 1 2th and 13th century Records belonging to Mr. Francis John Savile Foljambe, of Osberton, who, as the representative of several of the oldest families of Derbyshire and Notts., has inherited their muniments. This collection of deeds has hitherto slumbered in the dust, though in truth it is one of the most extensive and valuable in the whole of England, relating to South Yorkshire and North Derbyshire. To that eminent scholar, the Rev. C. B. Norcliffe, of Lang- ton Hall, Malton, the editor of "The Visitation of Yorkshire in 1563," and other works, the writer has to acknowledge the deepest gratitude ; since, but for his friendly aid and encouragement, he could not have persevered in this arduous undertaking. The author has also to acknowledge with gratitude and xviii PREFACE. respect the liberality which has been extended to him by many noblemen, and others, in giving him, — a mere stranger, with no credentials but those of literature, — access to their Muniment rooms ; a great mark of confidence, which has been of the highest importance to this work. His best thanks are especially due to the Right Hon. The Earl of Derby, K.G., who has not only permitted access to his private Records, but has accepted the Dedica- tion of this work to himself, as titular Earl of the county; to their Graces the Dukes of Devonshire and Rutland ; the Lord Arundel of Wardour ; The Earl of Egmont ; Mr. Savile, of Rufford Abbey; Mrs. Chaworth Musters, of Annesley Park ; Mr. Lancelot Rolleston of Watnal Hall ; Mr. Swift, of Sheffield ; and to many others, the author is deeply indebted. For the loan of books and MSS., and, in some cases, for their gifts of books, he has to thank The Right Hon. The Lord Denman ; Sir George R. Sitwell ; The Rev. C. B. Norcliff"; and The Rev. Dr. C. J. Cox, of Enville Rectory. Thanks are also due to the late Mr. Colvile, of Burton ; to Major J. Talbot Coke, for a copy of his work, The Cokes, of Trusley ; Mr. Andrews E. Cokayne, of Bakewell, for a copy of the Cockayne Memoranda, and other books ; to Mrs. Cha- worth Musters, for the loan of a MS. history of the Chaworth family, by William Flower, Norroy (1581), of great value. Also to the Right Honble. The Earl of Egmont for the loan of MS. Indices to Dugdale's Baronage ; to Mr. Wilfred Edmunds for Flavell Edmunds' "Traces of History in the names of Places ; " and to Mr. George Edward Gee, of Chesterfield, for the loan of several books ; to Mr. Wm. Brailsford Bunting, of Chesterfield, for the loan of a most interesting MS., the Poll Book for the Derbyshire County Election of 1703, when the people were more Conservative than they are at present, and for access to some ancient Court Rolls; to J. G. Wilson, PREFACE. xix Esq., of Alfreton, for copies of several subsidy Rolls in his possession, not to be found at the Record Office ; to IVIessrs. Shipton and Halliwell, of Chesterfield ; and to Mr. John Cutts, the Town Clerk, for access to their valuable Records. He has also to thank many correspondents for their aid and information. That so much aid should be accorded to one whose only connection with the County is that of a Barrister travelling the Circuit in which it is situated, is not only very grati- fying, but most encouraging — for it shows that there is a strong desire for the work, and a determination to support a writer who will do it honestly, and to the best of his ability. Cedar Villa, High Barnet, 3ij^ May, 1886. SECTION I. COLLECTIONS FOR THE HISTORY OF DERBYSHIRE. THE BOOK OF DOMESDAY. CHAPTER I. The great work of Domesday is the foundation of feudal history ; and a few observations upon its nature and value may assist the learned reader in fairly considering it. The great importance of this work does not arise because feudal institutions were founded in England at this period, as so many writers pretend, but because prior to this period writing was rarely used, either in the transfer or in the dealing with lands and manors, and it is the first fiscal record that we possess. The laws which then governed the country, especially with regard to measurements affecting taxation of land, varied from petty kingdom to kingdonl, and frequently in the same territory, and it was only in those laws which affected the Sovereign state that uniformity prevailed. It was chiefly in order to assimilate these laws that the survey was made. We find proof of the first proposition in the ever-varying customs of manors which prevail at the present day, whilst Domesday gives us distinct proof of the latter. In Domesday we possess, probably, the sum of the law, or as it was called the common law, to distinguish it from local custom, which existed in England for centuries prior to 2 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. its date, even so far back as the occupation of the Romans. Each monarch, as he ascended the throne, undertook to govern by the laws of his predecessors, and it is probable, though it is by no means clear, that this undertaking was reduced into writing, yet it is tolerably clear from the absence of contempo- rary authority, that William the Conqueror, who gave the same undertaking as did Canute and others, did not reduce his charter of liberties into writing, for there is no evidence of its existence at any time ; possibly he felt that it would be more convenient to trust (as the English custom was) to the memories of his chiefs ; and it was probable, upon finding them somewhat treacherous, that he resolved to reduce the question of their relative rights and duties into the form of Domesday. However this may be, the Book of Domesday is the first account we possess of the tenures of English estates, and so far as regards Derbyshire, the only comprehensive record for a considerable period. It is true that we shall find here and there in the charters granted by the Crown to various religious houses, and in the Pipe Rolls, and in some of the earliest public records, and in occasional private charters, facts of importance to county history ; but the first class. Abbey Cartularies, are not cotem- porary records, these documents having generally been com- piled as late as the thirteenth century ; and the writers of them had too much concern for the special interests of their orders to be invariably reliable, and as the earliest charters recorded in their books must have perished before they were compiled, it is obvious that they can only have been handed down by tradition ; indeed, the fact that before the Conquest writing was not employed in the transfer of land, seriously detracts from the little respect that can generally be accorded to them. That it was a fact, clear beyond dispute, that writing was not employed in land transfer, we may learn from the double system of conveyancing, that by charter, and that by fine, with livery of seizin (without charter), which prevailed down to the time of Charles the Second. And it is only after the Records of the County Court and of the Aula Regis were reduced into writing (a system which was inaugurated by the composition of Domesday), that we BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 3 can positively state, apart from the evidence of Domesday, what was the law affecting land in private hands, and who were the holders, and the terms of their tenure ; yet, looking at the tenacity with which the landowners clung to their rights during the 450 years of which we have official record, and indeed as regards under-tenants in private manors quite down to the present day, we may safely conclude that little change was made for centuries before this period, yet this is at best conjecture, and in endeavouring to write a history of these institutions, it is necessary to rely strictly upon facts, and to give the best positive proofs that can be supplied in support of it. Another reason why Domesday must be taken as the groundwork of our history, is that the greatest mystery and suspicion hangs over the question ; it is a fact that, until within a very short period, the existence of the so-called Saxon charters was unknown, even to so great an antiquary as Seldon. He declared that he never saw one, and well knowing that the English before the Conquest did not use writing in the con- veyance of land, he, not unnaturally, doubted their existence. Since the days of Seldon, however, a complete Saxon litera- ture has been unearthed ; when, where, and how, it is not the province of this work to discover, but it may be remarked that the vast majority of these do'cuments betray their own untrust- worthiness, by the fact that they contain no dates or details of the smallest value, which were previously unknown, and which can be tested by ascertained facts, whilst the authentic Norman contemporary charters and chartularies upon which this work is based are of the greatest value and interest, since they abound with life and instruction, and give us an insight into the public as well as the private history of estates and individuals. If the learned reader is desirous of following up the author's views on this subject, he must refer to his books on " Early English History," and that on " The Origin of the Nations of Western Europe." Here they would be out of place, and are only referred to for the purpose of weighing the value of the testimony of Domesday. It must here be remarked that, although very precious, Domesday is not so comprehensive and so valuable as it is generally supposed to be, and as both Sir Henry James and 4 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt insist. Both these learned writers seem to sum up their estimate of it, by quoting a passage from that mythical and wholly unreliable work, the Saxon Chronicle, the gist of which is, that in the year 1085 King William, hearing when in Normandy of a projected Danish Invasion, came over to England "with so large an army of horsemen and foot from France and from Brittany, as never before had sought this land, so that men wondered how this land could feed all that army, but the king caused the army to be distributed through all this land among his vassals, and they fed this army, each according to the measure of his land." "After this the king had a great counsel and very deep speech with his witan about this land, how it vs^as peopled and by what men, then sent his men over all England into every shire, and caused to be ascertained how many hundred hides were in the shire, what land the king himself had, and cattle within the land, and what dues he ought to have in twelve months from the shire. Also, he caused to be written how much land his archbishops had, and his suffragan bishops, and his abbots, and his earls, and though I may narrate somewhat prolixly what or how much each man had who was a holder of land in England, in land or in cattle, and how much money it might be worth, so very narrowly he caused it to be traced out, there was not one single hide, nor one yard of land (this should be translated " Yardland " or Virgate), nor even (it is shame to tell, though it seemed to him no shame to do) an ox, nor a cow, nor a swine was left, that was not set down in his writs, and all the writings were brought to him afterwards." Now before referring to the errors and inaccuracies of this account, it may be worth while to enquire who was the author of it. Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt calls it " a remarkable and important passage from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle," but the date shows that it could not have formed a portion of that Chronicle, which was, in fact, that of Marianus Scotus, as the author has proved in his " Early English History," and it was first called the Saxon Chronicle by Archbishop Parker, who himself invented the absurd compound term Anglo-Saxon, a word which puzzles foreign archaeologists, since it compounds the native with the foreign name of Englishmen. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 5 Marianus Scotus probably concluded his portion of the history about the year 1056, when he left this country ; but the writer of this paragraph evidently resided here.. He was probably Florence of Worcester, who adopted and continued Marianus, but whose work was so little thought of by William of Malmes- bury, that in giving an account of the histories extant in 1 120, he does not even refer to Marianus, the Saxon Chronicle, or to Florence of Worcester ; indeed, none of these works were brought to light until long afterwards, when a market was created for the concoction of Saxon literature. Now, first, as to the motive of the compilation — to find pro- vision for the army. This is a palpable error. The army might be billetted by necessity, but not by law, upon the people, for the people were the army. A standing army was then unknown. The king had no rights, and Domesday shows that he had no rights, over the lands of his tenants, except as regards his hidage, or, as Mr. Boult (Transactions of the Historic Society of Liverpool, 1871), states, the "aids" due from the land to the Crown, and the rights (courtesy, more properly), when the king made his journeys (progresses) through the country, he had nothing to do with the oxen, cows, or pigs on the estates, except when in progress he consumed a part of them. Nor could he intermeddle with the sub-rents of the tenants in any way. Each barony, nay, each manor, was a separate kingdom ; an imperium in imperio, governed by its own laws. Florence (or the writer of this paragraph) has blushed needlessly for the king on this account. His mistake, no doubt, arose from the mention of bovats or oxgangs, on which hides were payable ; just as at an earlier period, instead of in money prices were measured by so many oxen. The rents which the king could exact were only rack, or dry rents, and by no means represented the true value of the estate to the holder, but only the hidage or aid due to the king. It was originally a fixed measure of one pound — the old British tunc pound — which every knight paid for his fee of so many ploughlands. The record strictly only takes in the number of these ploughlands or bovates hidable in each village or town, and sometimes we luckily get at the name of the tenant— though very rarely more than his Christian name — but nothing more, for the king had no interest in him or control over him, except, 6 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. perhaps, as a measure of the number of fees in the village upon which his tenant-in-chief ought to pay hide. The rents of the sub-tenant and the terms of his tenure was a matter solely between the under-lord and himself, and of no importance to the king. A far more reliable account of the motives of the great Survey is to be found in the Register of Bermondsey under the years 1083-4, from which it would seem that it was a mere register of rents due to the Crown. It is quite clear, also, that, although the Commissioners, probably in consequence of special instruc- tions, made a return of all the fees in each village, they were not all geldable — that is, they did not all of them pay aid to the king, for we frequently read that in certain places only so many carucates were geldable, though others are mentioned, and even in King Edward's time, the payment for a carucate was variable. A carucate is only another name for ploughland ; hide refers to the aid payable in respect of it. Carucate is the cart team necessary to work it, supposed to be so called after the Roman manner of four horses having been yoked abreast. To show the variable nature of the tax, in Foston, four knights had, in King Edward's time, two and a half carucates hidable; then, twelve villains and eight borders had three ploughs and ten acres of meadow, of which the value was forty shillings. In Alkmanton there were four ploughs, two in demesne, and eight villains ; and then there were seven borders who had two ploughs and twelve acres of meadow. The value was the same. In Holloington, six thanes had one and a half carucates geldable, and land for twelve oxen ; eleven villains and seven borders had seven ploughs and eight acres of meadow, and a little underwood, in the time of King Edward, and then it was worth forty shillings. In Bradley, two knights had one carucate hidable, land for two ploughs, and it was worth forty shillings. In Snelston, six ploughs were valued at the same rate ; indeed, so variable is the number of carucates, ploughs, bovates, and acres for each forty or twenty shillings, that no rule can be laid down on that measure ; and the only safe conclusion seems to be, that for every separate holding in a village, one pound — the ancient British tunc pound — was originally charged : that is, a place was reckoned by so many knights' fees, each of which BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 7 was assessed at that sum. And in the course of centuries the actual value and working capacity of the estate had greatly increased, whilst the hide had not been raised. The king's thanes held their lands at a much cheaper rate. It was evidently originally taxed as the other land by pounds ; but these were now generally measured by shillings, probably according to the goodwill of the former sovereign at the time of the grant. In early days, land given to favourites was described as being held by a fraction of a knight's fee, sometimes a 200th part, or a nominal sum. These thanes are a particularly interesting class, as they represented the ancient nobility of the kingdom, and who were allowed still to hold their ancient fiefs. Many more were under-tenants of the Norman lords, but these men were never displaced. Another class of men rated were those living in towns where a hide or aid was paid for so many mansions or for so many ploughlands adjacent to the town, and belonging to it. Mr. Kemble ("Saxons in England," Vol. I, p. 488), who, with a certain class of writers (unfortunately a very large one), persists in ignoring the Celtic element in our laws, language, and literature (though it is the chief element), has made a ridiculous mistake in confounding the hide with the ploughland — that is, the tax with the subject of taxation. He writes, " it is necessary to bear in mind, that the hide is exclusively arable land," a state- ment which is at once disposed of by the taxes upon towns. For instance, Chester was assessed at 50 hides, whilst Exeter was assessed at 5. Derby, in King Edward's time, had 243 burgesses ; then it had 100 burgesses, and 40 lesser ones, " whilst 103 mansions, which used to be assessed, were waste." In King Edward's time the town had 12 carucates adjoining it, and rendered ;^24 ; then, with the ten mills and Litchurch, it was worth ^^30. At the same period (King Edward's time) Notting- ham had 173 burgesses, and only 6 carucates of land, for which, with the burgesses works, they paid only 75 shillings and 7 pence, in King William's time there were only 136 men dwelling there, 13 of whom had been put in by Hugh fitz Baldric, the Sheriff. In the time of King Edward, Nottingham yielded in rent £18; at Domesday, ;^30. It is very difficult to say at what hidage each of these towns was assessed, or whether they were assessed only according to 8 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. the burgess aid. The great increase from ;£'i8 and £20, to £10 in Nottingham and Derby, in spite of decrease in the number of burgesses in both, adds to the difficulty. The mint at Nottingham paid £\Q extra. Mines, saltworks, fisheries, and other properties, all contributed to make up the hides, so that many houses must have gone to form a single hide Where a city was measured by hides, the probability is that each parish in a city represented one or more hides, just as did a vill in the country. It may be, however, that the value at which these towns were assessed was only in respect of the lands held by them adjacent to the town, for the Pipe Rolls show that independently of the Dane- geld there was a distinct burgess aid. The particulars given are hardly conclusive on the point. Another class of land owners, or rather of manors, which were enquired into were the Terra Regis, the lands of ancient demesne, that land which had always supplied the royal revenue. For the most part this was let to the king's tenants, some of whom supplied food for the royal tables ; whilst others were let to farm at substantial rents, called fee-farm rents, just as the tenants-in-chief underlet their own estates ; or perhaps at a nominal rent, if the estate were given as a reward to a favourite. In only some instances, and probably for these reasons, is there any value placed on these lands. Those lands so let at fee-farm could not be disposed of by the sovereign, except for his life. Upon his death they re- verted unfettered to his successor. We see, therefore, that not only did not the king, " to his shame," take an account of his subjects' cattle, but that he did not tax all their lands, but only those which, doubtless, from time out of mind, had been regularly taxed for the royal revenue, and those which he himself had granted, but it would rather seem that he increased the taxes on towns in proportion to their works, and the number of their burgesses. The following tables have been extracted from the MSS. of the late Rev. Robert Eyton, now deposited at the British Museum, and numbered 3 1924 amongst the Additional MSS., and they give at a glance an important fact, which supplies the true reason of the Survey, Instead of the king growing richer, the revenues of the Crown were, in country places at least, being sensibly diminished. Omitting fractions, the gross value of the five wapentakes of Derbyshire had fallen from £^'^7 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 9 to .^455 ; and again, the measurement of a carucate varied in each hundred, no doubt to the king's loss. This calculation of the royal revenue, however, does not include the fee-farm rents of the Crown. We learn one important fact from the consideration of this subject which is generally overlooked. Not only were many ploughlands in vills which might have been taxed left out of the calculation, but only those vills in which lands are taxed are mentioned in Domesday, so that it is not a perfect record even of the estates of the nobles. The author has found nearly as many places in Derbyshire (many, if not most, of which must have been manors at this period), and which are unmentioned in Domesday as those which are given, and the number is con- tinually increasing, a fact which teaches us that Mr. Eyton's valuable tables must only be read as applying to Domesday, that is, to only part of the county, and not as illustrative of the whole ; unfortunately, we have no means of obtaining statistics as to the rest. The Rev. Mr. Eyton, in his Derbyshire Notes, has pointed out various small distinctions observable in the different surveys of Derbyshire and Stafford, with a view to determine under which circuit they were severally surveyed, a matter of not very great importance ; his criticisms, however, are of greater value in determining the objects of the survey. In Derbyshire, mill sites, churches, and portions of manors apportioned to others, were mentioned, but not in Staffordshire, and the latter only invariably gave the measurements of small woods. These differences would appear to show that much was left to the discretion of the Commissioners, that the Crown desired to learn as much as possible, but that no special instructions were given on some subjects, and therefore it would seem to follow that many items of property were referred to which were not taxable at that period. It would be interesting to learn whether the Conqueror took any legislative action in consequence of the report, or whether the laws relating to taxation remained unaltered, but were only more strictly applied. Judging from the evidence of the Pipe Rolls, it would seem that nothing was done, and no legislation of any consequence appears to be recorded by contemporary chroniclers. 3 lO BOOK OF DOMESDAY. It certainly appears from Eyton's studies that Derby was surveyed by the same Commissioners who surveyed Yorkshire, Huntingdon, Nottingham, and Lincolnshire, and that part of Rutland which was included in Nottingham ; and it is probable that the surveys of Lincolnshire and Yorkshire induced the Commissioners to call the hundreds of Derbyshire wapentakes. Why, it is not very clear, because there is nothing in common in the derivation of the two words, indeed the latter is generally used as a portion of the former, and there is one instance of such a measure of a hundred in Derbyshire in the Manor of Sawley. A portion of the wapentake or hundred of Morleston is called itself a hundred, and it contained I2 carucates, the standard measurement of the smaller kind of hundred. There can be but little doubt that before the Conquest, and when Derby formed a portion of the Kingdom of Mercia, it was then divided into hundreds, like its sister counties on the south and west. The name wapentake was only occasionally used in Derbyshire down to the time of Edward I., or perhaps a little later, when that of hundred became again permanently in use, but even when it was used, both words were used indiscrimi- nately. Eyton has expended a good deal of labour on this point, which is scarcely intelligible. Had he examined the records he would have seen that, whatever their meaning, the terms were used interchangeably, as if identical ; just as hide and carucate were afterwards confused. That in Derbyshire a wapentake is equivalent to a hundred is quite clear, from the fact that the modern hundreds are con- terminous with the Domesday wapentakes, although some of them have been sub-divided into two parts, or, perhaps more properly, half hundreds ; and this at once disposes of Eyton's idea that the county was divided into hundreds of 12 carucates each. Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt has not hazarded much upon the question of measurements, nor has he formed a definite system for Derbyshire; perhaps in doing so he has exercised a wise discretion. He gives a carucate as equivalent to a ploughland, a rather indefinite expression ; a hide, which he also, with Mr. Kemble, regards as a measure of land and not of taxation, according to him varying from 30 to 120 acres. A bovat or oxgang, a ploughland, equal to an eighth part of a carucate. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. u and equal to a quantity varying from 8 to 24 acres. A virgate as a fourth, or perhaps an eighth of a hide, which, tabulated, omitting variations, leaves a virgate, and a bovat equal to an eighth of a hide, and therefore equal to each other, and each equal to eight acres, or it may be that one virgate equalled two bovats of that amount. The term hide does not appear to be used in the Derbyshire Domesday, nor does virgate appear till a later period. Eyton has, according to the writer's ideas, fallen into great confusion by insisting upon the terms hide and carucate being identical, simply because he supposed that he found that each contained 48 geld acres (fol. 6) ; he, however, rejects the measure hide as applied to this county. He describes the county of Derby as divided into wapentakes, carucates, bovats, and geld acres, whilst his own tables show that some of these measures bear no sort of proportion to each other, and indeed that they vary in each hundred. Omitting fractions, in Apletre there were 512 acres to the carucate, in Morleston 261, in Hameston 736, and so on. Of course this discrepancy may be accounted for by supplying the acres which were not geldable, but taking it as- true, this would give 64 acres to the bovat in Apletre, 32 in Morleston, and 92 in Hameston ; yet in another part of his treatise, he has broadly stated that a Derbyshire carucate or ploughland measured 120 acres (fol. 12), and the mode he arrives at this calculation is so remarkable that the whole passage is transcribed. He writes : — " While on the subject of the ploughland, I would fain add from the Derbyshire Survey a corroboration of my theory adopted long since on other grounds, that the ordinary Terra ad unam caracam measured 120 statute acres. The passage describing Henry de Ferrars' two manors of Hertshorne runs as follows : — Doms 80, 274, 3, 2. Manerium in Heorteshorne habebat Aluricus iiii carucatas terrse ad geldam. Terra iiij carucis, wasta est, silva pastilis dimidia leuva longa et dimidia (leuva) lata. Terra arabilis tantundem T. R. E. valebat iiij libras modo (valet) x solidos. "Manerium in alia Heorteshorne habetat Aluricus ij caru terrae ad geldam. Terra ij carucis, wasta est, silva pastilis dimidia leuva longa et dimidia leuva lata. Terra arabilis 12 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. tantundem T. R. E. valebat xl solidos modo valet x soHdos." In each case the plough capacity (Terr. 4 car., Terr. 2 car.) is calculated perhaps on that ordinary feature of the carucate or hide, that each carucate or hide involved one ploughland, or it may have been that the Domesday Commissioners found actual record that 4 teams and 2 teams had been employed at some previous period on the two estates respectively. There could be no other adaptability or normal capacity of the ploughland, for we see that in one manor the four plough- lands co-ordinated with just the same quantity of arable land as did the two ploughlands of the other. The expressions terr iiij car, terra ij carucis, are used then either technically, erro- neously, or else with reference to some known antecedent, to correct the glaring inconsistency or inaccuracy, and to certify the Commissioners' opinion about adaptability or present capacity. They added, perhaps, those unusual words, measur-' i-ng the arable land by an exact measure. The whole case will best be stated algebraically. In one manor, of 4 ploughlands = | league x J a league = 360 statute acres, or I ploughland = 90 statute acres. In the other manor, 2 ploughlands = J league x J a league = 360 statute acres, . or I ploughland =180 statute acres. It is not likely that the Domesday Commissioners were ignorant of the doctrine that two things equal to the same were equal to one another, but it is not improbable that, to point inaccurate or suspected premises, they might use a process akin to what logicians term a reductio ad absurdam ; they used other formula suggestive of a similar suspicion, e.g., terra est ij carucis sed tamen ibi iiij carucis. In all such questions, if we cannot surely interpret the text and intention of isolated passages of Domesday, we can estab- lish pretty safe conclusions by adding further premises and calculating general results. In the present case, the question of the average measurement of a Domesday ploughland, we need to add no further premises, we need only to combine the two seemingly discordant premises. The added equations will be : — BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 13 4 pis. + 2 ploughs. = 360 a. + 360 a. 6 ploughs. = 720 a. I plough. = 120 a. and such is the exact conclusion to which I arrived when studying the Dorset Survey, and arguing from other lights. — (See Key to Domesday, 23, 24.) It is only fair to point out that this MS. was not prepared for the press, and had it been, probably the learned author would himself have corrected it. Now, putting aside the extraordinary reasoning which could satisfy a man of such undoubted talent as Mr. Eyton, let us look at these entries, and two facts are at once apparent. First, that there is no other instance in the Derbyshire Domesday where arable land is measured by leagues ; it is invariably measured by carucates or land measures. That woods and underwoods, on the other hand, are never measured by carucates or plough measures, but always by lineal measures. And we shall see at once that, curiously enough, the scribe has used the words " arable land " twice, in mistake for underwood. In no instance in this Domesday is land, whether arable or not, given after wood ; besides, the land, although waste, was already measured, by land and not by lineal measure. Why, then, measure it twice over } This is not done in any other instance, as Mr. Eyton himself has discovered. But assuming that arable land was intended and only described by lineal measure, because, like wood, it was of little value (as a fact, waste lands are never so measured), how possibly could a simple addition and division sum, magnified here into an equation, solve the difficulty } There is literally nothing in the entries ! In the first manor the tenant paid £4 for four carucates, and in the second £2 for a couple, that is the old tunc pound for each carucate. Both manors being waste, they were each reduced to the nominal payment of half a hide. The truth is, that many ancient terms, as hundred, hide, acre, etc., etc., have several distinct meanings, and at various periods either lose their true meaning or are misapplied. The important question for Derbyshire history is, what was the meaning of these terms in this county ? PoHdore Vergil states a hide to be 2C acres ; whilst Agard fixes it at 100 ; and other instances as high as 240. Sir George Sitwell has furnished a 14 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Derbyshire record, wherein a bovate is stated properly to contain 80 acres (Charter concerning land at Barlborough), but a question may arise whether this quantity was general throughout the county, or only applicable to a particular manor; or, in fact, whether it was not a generous bovat. Mr. Frederick Seebohm, in his interesting work, " The Village Community," has paid great attention to the origin and meaning of the word hide, and although he has missed its correct etymology (probably he had not the advantage of reading Mr. Boult's admirable paper upon the subject), he is not very far wrong in its application. He writes, p. 398, " The word hide, which still baffles all attempts to explain its meaning, may possibly have had reference to a similar tribute. Even in England it does not follow that it was, in its origin, connected with the plough team." He was referring to the Frisians, with whom existed the custom of the tribute of a hide for every so many oxen, which, he adds, " was as ready a mode of assessing the tribute as counting the plough teams would be in an agricultural district.'' Mr. Seebohm has given a very interesting table of measures for Huntingdonshire, taken from the Hundred Rolls, from which it appears that in nineteen cases the number of virgates in a hide varied from 4 to 8 ; in seven cases the number was 4 ; in five it was 5 ; in six it was 6 ; and in one, 8 ; whilst the number of acres in a virgate varied from 15 to 48. The number of acres in a hide was less variable : in eight cases there were 1 20 acres to a hide ; in four, 125 ; the other seven all differing from them. Mr. Seebohm calculates that the normal virgate or yard land was one-fourth of a hide, and contained 30 acres. But in the face of such varia- tions it seems almost idle to endeavour to arrive at a definite solution of the question, and all that can positively be predicted is that the hide, or carucate, really represents an uncertain amount of land, varying according to soil and climate, which a single plough-team could work. This learned writer seems to think that carucate is a later word than hide, and supplanted it subsequently to the period of the Hundred Rolls, but this is obviously a mistake. Both are to be found in Domesday, and both probably were of Gaelic origin, the one describing the tax or aid (eid), and the other the thing by which the aid was measured. It is, therefore, not BOOK OF DOMESDAY. IS Strictly accurate to describe the hide as varying ; what varied was the subject of the hide. Perhaps the true cause of the variable quantity of the carucate is to be found in its unit. It is clear from the statute of 33rd Edward I., which fixed the acre at 40 perches in length and 4 in breadth, that its variable nature was a source of contention and strife, which it was desirable to avoid. The shape of the acre shows that it was so many furrows ; and we learn an important fact from Mr. Seebohm's book that down to a late period the idea of every acre being a specific part of a carucate or plough-team was no fiction, but a reality ; and that the joint owners of the carucate were also the joint owners of the plough team, and, took their part in the ploughing in a regular rotation. This is proved conclusively by the descrip- tion of the virgate of one John Moldeson, in the manor of Winslow, which consisted of over 68 half-acre strips of land, scattered in different common fields of the manor. In 66 cases his land on one side abutted upon the land of John Watkins ; on 43 of the other to Henry Ward's land ; and in 23 to John Mayn's land. These four men, therefore, each held one or a part of one virgate of the carucate, and jointly owned the plough team. And we get at this further fact, that the fields would be each of 2 acres (40 rods in length, by 8 broad), which would constitute a double day's ploughing for a full team of oxen, or perhaps only one day in a light soil. It is in the history of this system of co-operative ploughing that the confusion between the hide and the carucate and bovat arose. Our only true measure of what was the English law before the Conquest is to be found in the Welsh, the ancient British laws ; and from these we learn that the common profits of the common undertaking were divided nominally between the oxen, in a regular system of rotation the place in the team depending as much, perhaps, upon the share of its owner, as upon the strength and capabilities of the ox. The author has derived very great benefit from the labours of Major-General Wrottesly for the William Salt Society for Staffordshire. They cannot be too highly commended, since they supply, in an admirable form, the most important imforma- tion relative to that county. It is to be hoped that the learned author will continue his labours in this direction. General 1 6 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Wrottesly has noted that the assessment for that county only varied one penny during the reigns of Henry I. and II. ; and he informs us that in 8 Henry II., it was reduced to £4.2 os. 7d. His table of land measures seems too fanciful to be of real value to Derbyshire students. He would give a knight's fee as equal to 3000 acres, or three hides, or four carucates ; three virgates, or 750 acres, being equal to one carucate. The Evesham Cartulary suggests the following table : — " Twelve acres to a virgate, four virgates to a hide, eight hides to a scutage ; a carucate being only equal to three virgates." Derbyshire Domesday only mentions carucates, bovats, and acres ; and from that book itself the relation of bovats to carucates can be certainly adduced, and from several instances. In the king's manor of Langdendale, it is shown that eight bovats go to the carucate ; so it would appear from Snelston, though there is an error of one bovat in the calculation. But it is quite clear again from Henry de Ferrers' manor of Burnaston, so that Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt's estimate of from eight to twenty- four bovats would seem not to apply to Derbyshire, since it is there a fixed and not a variable measure. In Geoffry Ascelins' manor of Braideston we appear to get the measure of a carucate. Gilbert de Gant held there two carucates of land, one mile in length and three furlongs in breadth, which would give 120 acres to the carucate and fifteen to the bovat, counting 640 acres to the square mile. Curiously, this exactly agrees with Mr. Eyton's calculation respecting the number of acres in a carucate. Hubert fitz Ralf's manor of Middleton is measured by one mile in length and four furlongs in breadth. One carucate was geldable in it, and there was land for one plough, but it was waste, and little evidence can be gathered from this estimate. Whatever may have been the case in Derbyshire, it would seem that the normal measure generally throughout the country was twelve acres to the bovat and eight bovats to the carucate, and eight carucates to the knight's fee, or scutage, and the virgate, which we do not find in Derbyshire until long after Domesday, was in some places equivalent to a bovat, and in others to a double bovat. As already observed, Domesday is not what it is generally supposed to be, an account of every yard of land and, of all the creeping things upon it (that is a record of the national BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 17 property), but simply an account (with occasional additional facts, suggestive of an attempted increase in taxation) of the number of carucates within each county which were hidable, that is, a merely fiscal document, and it becomes a very interest- ing problem to ascertain how far this can be proved by, and compared with, subsequent records. The earliest records which we possess bearing directly upon the question are the Pipe Rolls ; and at irregular periods, as necessity compelled a levy, we find the scutages, as they were then called, payable by those knights who held estates which were liable to pay danegelt. It would be a mistake, perhaps, to confound danegelt with the geld payable at the time of Domesday. These taxes were probably payable on other occasions besides those when danegelt are exacted : that is, whenever the State required a subsidy ; and Domesday records the very manors and the fractions of the scutage which each manor or soke was liable to contribute upon these occasions. Unfortunately, we can only gather from the Pipe Rolls the gross amount of scutage payable in each county. But these figures seem to prove that, if the Conqueror took any action in consequence of this Domesday Survey, it soon died out, and the ancient order of things was restored, for the amount of scutage remained the same, whilst that of levy still continued to decrease. We have a scutage in a Pipe Roll which Mr. Hunter has attempted to date as that of the year 31 Henry I., and unthinking persons accept that date as conclusive, although Dugdale and the older writers, whose opinions should not lightly be discarded, considered that it was of the date of 5 Stephen; others thought the isth of that king ; others the ist ; whilst some writers, even of the present day, have supposed that it supplied the missing Roll of i Henry II. (if, indeed, that roll is missing), the series of these records being perfect from the second year' of that king. And there is more weight in this suggestion than is generally accorded to it. It is usually set aside without consideration, because the sheriffs in this Roll and that of 2 Henry II., are different, but that is surely to be expected, for necessarily Henry II. would find Stephenite sheriffs when he came to the throne, and would speedily replace them by his own friends. We hardly know upon what facts or evidence Dugdale and the 4 1 8 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. elder writers relied, but the truth seems to be that each of the contending parties have strong evidence drawn from different Rolls in support of their separate views, and each may be right with regard to these different Rolls, for it by no means follows that it is a Roll of one year : it may be a collection of the fragments of several. The Roll is imperfect, many counties being omitted ; and this fact alone should warn the positive guessers of uncertainty and danger. Whether this be the case or not, it is undoubtedly of a very early date, and most probably about fifty years later than Domesday. We, then, beyond all question, have the Roll of 2 Henry II., which was exactly seventy years later, and the following notes, extracted from these Rolls, shows conclusively that there was essentially no difference between the assessments of these two periods ; and this assessment continued the same for centuries afterwards. It is submitted that the discrepancies between them arose from accident — from manors falling out of cultivation, or from ignorance or mistake, and not from any change in the law or from design. On the fourteen following counties, the difference in the assessment was under ;^io, although the difference in the actual receipts was much greater. The large sums allowed for waste in 2 Henry II. shows the misery which ensued from the violence suffered under King Stephen, and the diminution in the amount of tax between the time of Domesday and that of the end of Henry I.'s reign may well represent the waste occasioned by the rebellions against, and the violent conduct of, that monarch. It would be very interesting to contrast the relative amount assessed under Domesday for the whole country, but the labour would be too great. The rate of the assessment of Henry II. is, fortunately, quite clear from the Pipe Roll for the county of Worcester. The bishop said he had only fifty knights who ought to be assessed, for which he paid ;£'40 los. into the Treasury (and for which payment of i^ig los., was excused), or exactly at the rate of £i per scutage. The author has roughly calculated the amounts assessed in Nottingham and Derbyshire. They are, unfortunately, lumped together in the Pipe Rolls as one county : why, is not so clear. Other counties besides Nottingham and Derby had the same sheriff, as Yorkshire and Northumberland, Cambridge and Huntingdon, BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 19 Wilts, and Dorset, Dorset and Somerset, Bucks, and Beds., and some others. The last two counties are lumped together in 2 Henry II., but kept separate in Henry I. The author has calculated roughly the amount of scutage levied in both Notts, and Derby at the date of Domesday ; and for Derbyshire his calculation is within a couple of carucates of that of the Rev, Mr. Eyton, so that both are probably nearly accurate, Mr, Eyton's gives the sum of 698 carucates, with a fraction, for Derbyshire, and the author has calculated that Nottingham had a little under 500 hidable carucates. Now, dividing the sum of the two counties by eight, we find that Derbyshire and Nottingham between them possessed about 149 scutages, or knight's fees. Taking it at the sum of £1 per scutage, we see that it had sunk in the time of Henry I. in about the same proportion as the scutage of that year had fallen in the time of Henry II., that is generally, throughout the country. The proportionate waste in Derbyshire was excessively high, probably because so large a portion of it was devoted to the chase. Pipe Roll, 31-5 Henry I, NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY— ;^ s. d. £ 78 13 9 paid into Treasury. 38 24 13 I excused payment, 15 5 2 8 in hands of sheriff. 58 Pipe Roll, 2 Hknry H. s. d. 5 S paid into Treasury. 5 o excused payment. [ I 6 waste since former assessment. 108 9 6 112 I II STAFFORD— 29 15 S paid. 25 5 6 paid. 14 S 6 excused. 10 6 excused. 8 8 4 waste. 7 in hand. 44 II 44 I 4 LEICESTER- 56 19 paid. 25 7 6 paid. 39 10 10 excused. 22 8 3 excused. 3 10 2 in hand. SI 8 2 waste , 16 in hand. 100 99 19 II HERTS — 61 I 8 paid. 45 12 7 paid. 41 4 7 excused. 29 II 4 excused 7 15 I in hand. 29 17 4 waste. 5 in hand. no I 3 20 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Pipe Roll, 31-5 Henry I. OXFORD— £ s. d. 116 6 5 paid. no 17 10 excused. 12 5 o in hand. Pipe Roll, 2 Henry II. 237 3 7 KENT- SI 2 3 paid. 52 9 9 excused. I 10 10 in hand. £ s. d. 44 6 1 103 4 4 96 2 10 5 14 2 paid, excused, waste, in hand. 239 9 3 249 7 S DORSET— 98 2 3 paid. 169 12 10 paid. 130 2 9 excused. 39 IS 15 II 8 excused, waste. 3 IS 6 in hand. 228 5 228 IS WILTS.— 146 paid. 199 10 S paid. 241 8 2 excused. 80 iS I excused. I 5 in hand. 99 16 9 waste. 9 7 9 in hand. 388 13 2 389 13 EVERWIC- - 114 4 paid. 124 10 10 paid. 51 19 2 excused. 10 19 4 excused. II I 8 waste. 18 17 8 in hand . 166 3 2 165 9 6 SURREY— 84 II paid. 105 3 paid. 90 10 excused. 37 6 6 excused. 175 I 142 9 6 ESSEX— 134 8 6 paid. 98 6 paid. 78 18 I excused. 76 18 excused 23 17 in hand. 61 4 waste. 236 8 o 88 15 o paid. 16 7 3 excused. 080 waste. o 6 7 in hand. 105 2 10 105 16 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 21 Pipe Roll, 31-5 Henry I. SUSSEX— £ s. d. 94 o 4 paid. IIS 8 3 excused. Pipe Roll, 2 Henry H. 209 8 7 LINCOLN— 191 4 o paid. 65 7 4 excused, o o 8 in hand. 256 12 o BUCKS.— lis o o paid. 84 3 o excused. 511 7 'n hand. BEDS.— 76 8 9 paid. 30 8 9 excused. 3 14 6 in hand. £ s, d. 157 12 4 33 7 o 920 16 19 2 217 o 6 paid, excused, waste. in hand. 141 o o paid. 48 16 10 excused. 70 14 lb waste. 5 8 o in hand. 265 19 8 The two counties- 118 8 S paid. 81 4 6 excused. 107 14 3 waste. 315 6 7 307 7 2 These returns are interesting, as showing the relative importance of the several counties ; but they are immensely valuable in proof of the practically identical assessment at these two periods, and their agreement with Domesday. The item of waste, tempe Henry II., shows that the account was made up relatively to an earlier one. That of Henry I. unfortunately omits this series of items. Unfortunately, too, we have no account of the waste created prior to Domesday in the amounts of assessable land. We know that it was then so much, but we have no record what it was in the time of Edward the Confessor — that is, probably, the time of Canute. We get the decline in the value of the manor or soke at Domesday and T.R.E., but this gives no idea of the value of the scutage, which bore no proportion to the value of the manor. In the following table, which was compiled by the late Mr. Eyton, we see the latter values : — 22 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. CO II 1!^ S c S a, >^ I >, _• o- Tj- 00 ■^ 00 o% :=: j: o rt 13 ^ 8 M rt bfl • -*1 -*a r*I OH rnhf •a oi 3 s-a 00 « O VD ^ S = . t^ 0^ VO O^ 00 M u ° ro 'd- n- CO 5- >F t^t^ CO " - M M < ft _2i OJ H« H* oW B « 01 -s^l CI M ■* 5= oi -o.Sm < K •aw irt :S '> • rH .rA 13 X r^ r*l tn-i' -*< IS c^ 00 00 O VD oo o? :s s > X X '? i< "S S s -^ VO VO o o !8 ° S o yjVO ^ O 1^^ 00 S'.- "^■^ WTf «h«- -^ 1-*: q cow O D. " s?2> \D N N N vD o li-> m u- } o " M On t^ rv. t^ CO li-1 00 a^ o ^ NH 'd- 1 In '^ vD ° O vO Jo 1 Jo » o grt 'fl " H -- -^ MK» Hw v-fc q ^M S ft . s?K m M t-^ >» O =J «::t- N ON 00 u-i « hH c« On 00 VO ^ 00 l-l w '"' '"' li-» d - - a< fcSS ■^ VO ON xn O ■* .«J MO CO VO fi > » t^ N o\ ■) -^ ,„ d 4) Is u-i C^ O o f T ON i^ oc r^ -J-1 ■3-S- -„i M I-* 00 r^ IV. XO oc \C cT vC o N ro u S^ 3 c ^ m vn U-) ON irl 1^ VC ''t a\ V* :» N •= 3 ft.2 "o 00 Tj- •* m 5- t^ ■^ M„^„„ rj' .Si..^ t3 13 n6 TD 'd ti^.-n r^ r*l K— o o^ Th C' ■) 00 ^m 00 VO M g:eE rrt 'J O "•go Tt i>. C\ N w u-1 00 M O oc oc VD 0< VC 00 ro yi "P «£; Os r^ t^ oc o HO) O 11 !>. CO fD cr* Q s^^ o O o o OC C ro c 1 On cs -1 O) ^ii ir^ •- c^ Mftg« -6 o « O M « " VO « On II r !>. vO VO ^ 00 S?" o o O o C "^ N C VC r-^ \6 -^^ lO t-i I-" CO (S 00 t- 00 C 4J o S I, d v£) fO >s VO LO o o ^ M lO M r>. O^ ro i-^CN i-T?J i>- r-^ O CO o o "^ c GO Cs O VO CO CO NO i* b =- Cv 0\ !-< -jf u -1 o" c^^^J^ ^ N *" ON •■SS O ^*^ o o tt c fO .« > '> tS nd . c ^ vO h- ^ ro P| > 'x d '> >< > > d O »0 t^ 00 a\ t- On (£ 1- O •- •- "-• •- ^ »^ e-S > .p4 - > ol *K X > '> ■^ 'x U c c d OJ [/■ "rt (3 o oJ tn c o 'p £ 1 O H to ID B n w BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 23 It will be seen that Mr. Eyton has contrasted the gross value of the manors with that of the scutage, but they appear to have no relation to each other ; and this is apparefit from the variation of the proportions to a carucate in each hundred. The gross value of the wapentakes is £$87 6s. od., and the number of carucates over 100 more. This would give a hidage of nearly seven times the proper amount. But the hidage was never variable : it always was fixed at the same sum for the whole of England, usually 20s. So, too, the calculations of the number of acres to a carucate are useless. They are inserted from respect for Mr. Eyton, and because some persons will prefer his reading of the document ; but it is confidently submitted that, although the gross value of the wapentakes bore a certain proportion to the cultivated acreage of the county, it had no relation whatever to the hidable carucates. The latter quantity, in fact, depended upon the generosity or caprice of previous kings, who had assessed some knights or thanes strictly, or the reverse. We see that the gross value of the wapentakes had fallen from £^87 6s. T.R.E., to £4$^ i8s. at Domesday, or nearly 23 per cent. It is improbable that the decrease occurred during William's reign. Much as he loved sport, he valued money more. Nor is it probable that it occurred during the reign of Edward the Confessor, for no forests or chases were laid down in most of the wasted manors ; we know that, from the record of the population remaining. We therefore necessarily conclude that the assessment of T.R.E. was the old assessment of King Canute ?Lnd his Danish successors, and hence possibly in hatred of the tax, we find it still called Dane gelt in the reign of the Plantaganets : this, and not the popular notion of it, is probably the truth. The learned reader must also be cautioned from a too great reliance upon other portions of Mr. Eyton's tables, especially those of wood acreages. The Domesday Commissioners calculated them very roughly, rarely condescending to a less measure than half a mile. A wood of two miles long by one and a half broad, and so forth, evidently mere guesses, for in a hilly county like Derbyshire it would be difficult, even in these days, to find a wood at all similar in shape to a parallelogram. The author has not been able to discover the data on which Mr. Eyton founds his reputed arable acreages. It is probable 24 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. that he obtained it by adding the number of carucates and bovates, which are invariably set down in Domesday after the enumeration of the hidal assessment. If, instead of calculating this sum in acres, it had been left in carucates, it would have been of far greater value, as it would have shown how many carucates escaped assessment. Taking the liberty of calculating it upon this basis, and with Mr. Eyton's table of 48 acres to the carucate, we find that only 693 carucates were geldable, out of a gross number of 1887, or little more than one-third of the land under plough cultivation ; and, taking the gross acreage only, that number, out of 8825, or calculating it in acres, only 33,264 acres were hidable, out of a gross sum of 423,594, or only about one-thirteenth of the whole county. The accuracy of this calculation, however, depends upon the correctness of Mr. Eyton's assumption that a carucate contained only 48 acres. In all probability the true measure of a carucate is nearly three times as much. It would appear that much of the confusion which exists between the terms hide and carucate, is attributable to the changes made in the assessment of landed property by Arch- bishop Hubert, in 1 198, a most important event in feudal history, which will be noticed hereafter. His Commissioners, in order to prevent loss to the Exchequer, determined in a kind of sub-parliament (equivalent to a sitting of the House of Commons), that in future the carucate throughout the whole country should consist of 100 acres, and thus confusing the ploughland with the hide. General Wrottesly observes that " Staffordshire was assessable to the geld tax to the extent of only 440^ hides, and which left a large area ungeldable, not," he observes, " by reason of the accidental privilege in favour of the king's writ, but of immemorial prescription." He adds that "the rate of assess- ment for the year was 2s. per hide." This is probably arrived at by calculating the scutage at ten hides, and dividing by the well-known amount of £1 per knight's fee. 25 TRANSLATION OF DOMESDAY. Derb^ebire, Abbreviations.— M = Manor. S = Soke. B=Berewite. T. R. E. val. = In the time of King Edward it was worth. Land = Arable Land. Page 272a Domesday, column I. Each leaf only of the Original MS. being numbered, the paging 272a, or 272^, indi- cates the front or back of each leaf respectively. These numbers are commonly used in references to the MS. Here are noted those who I. King William. II. The Bishop of Chester. III. The Abbey of Bertone. nil. Hugh Earl of Chester. V. Roger of Poictou. VI. Henry de Ferrars. VII. William Peverel. VIII. Walter Deincourt. IX. Geoffrey Alselin. HOLD LAND IN DERBYSHIRE. X. XI. XII. XIII. Ralph Fitzhubert. Ralph de Byron. Hasculf Musard. Gilbert de Gant. XIIII, Nigel de Stafford. XV. Robert Fitzwilliam. XVI. Roger de Busli. XVII. The King's Thanes. I. THE LAND OF THE KING.— (TERRA REGIS.)* SCARVEDELE WAPENTAKE. Fol. 272a, Col. II.] M. In Nevvebold with vi. berewites, Witintune, Brimintune, Tapetune, Cestrefeld, Buitorp, Echintune, there are vi. * It was held by the Judges in early times that no land is of the ancient demesne of the Crown, unless it is recorded amongst the Terra Regis of Domesday. 5 26 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 272a, Col. II.] carucates and i. bovate of land hidable. Land for vi. ploughs. The King has xvi. villanes and ii. bordars and i. servus there having iv. ploughs. To this Manor belong viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iii. miles in length, and iii. miles in breadth. T. R. E. val. vi. pounds ; now, X. pounds. S. In Wingreurde ii. carucates of land. Soke of this Manor hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, xiv. soke-men have iv. ploughs there. S. In Greherst and Padinc iv. bovates of land hidable. It is waste. S. In Normantune the -y part of i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough, i. soke-man has ii. oxen in a plough there. S. In Honestune the ^ part of i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. oxen. S. In Dranefeld i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough, iii. villanes and i. bordar have ii. ploughs there. S. In Rauenesham and Vpetun i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough, iv. soke-men having i. plough there. S. In Toptune and Nortune ii. bovates of land hidable. To these lands of the soke-men vii. acres of meadow are adjoining. Wood, pasturable, v. miles in length, and iii. miles in breadth. Of level land, Ix. acres. M. In Onestvne and Normantune Lewin and Edwin had vii. and bovates and iv. acres of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. Eere- "'"'• i. plough now in demesne there ; and vi. villanes, and iv. bordars, having iv. ploughs. A church there, and a priest, and ii. mills worth iv. shillings, and ii. acres and ^ of meadow. Wood, pasturable, | a mile in length, and | in breadth. T. R. E. val. xiii. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. M. In Waletvne Hundulf had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. It is waste. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 27 HAMMENSTAN (HIGH PEAK AND WIRKSWORTH) WAPENTAKE. Fol. 272a, Col. II.] M. In Dereleie King Edward had ii. carucates of land hidable. Eire- In Farleie and Cotes and Berleie i. carucate and ii. bovates wites. of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. The King has i. plough there, and vii. villanes having iii. ploughs. A priest there, and a church ; and xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and ii. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings, and ii. sextaries of honey ; now, iv. pounds. M. In Mestesforde King Edward had ii. carucates of land not hidable. It is waste, viii. acres of meadow there, and i. lead-work. Wood, pasturable here and there, iii. miles in length, and ii. in breadth. To this Manor adjoin these berewites : Meslach, Snitiretone, Wodnesleie, Bunteshale, Ibeholon, Teneslege. In these vii. carucates of land hidable. Land for vii. ploughs. xi. villanes and xii. bordars have vi. ploughs there, and xxii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and i. mile in breadth. As much under-wood. Fol. 272^, Col. I.] M. In Werchesvorde there are iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. A priest and a church there, and xvi. villanes and ix. bordars having iv. ploughs. There are iii. lead-works, and xxvi. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and ii. miles in breadth. Berewites of this Manor. In Crunforde ii. carucates, and Middeltune ii. carucates, and Opetune iv. carucates, and Welledene ii. carucates, and Chersintune ii. carucates, and Caldelauue ii. carucates, and Hiretune iv. carucates ; xviii. carucates of land hid- able. Land for as many ploughs. In these there are xxxvi. villanes, and xiii. bordars, having xiv. ploughs and a J. There xiv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, and under-wood, iii. miles in length, and ii. in breadth. 28 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 272!), Col. I.] M. In Esseburne are iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. It is waste, yet it renders xx. shillings. A priest and a church there, with i. carucate of land hidable ; and he has there ii. villanes, and ii. bordars, having | a plough. He himself i. plough, and i. man who renders xvi. pence ; and xx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and ^ a mile in breadth. Berewites of this Manor. In Mapletune ii. carucates, and Bredelauue ii. carucates, and Torp ii. carucates, and Benedlege ii. carucates, and Ophidecotes ii. carucates, and Ochenauestun iv. carucates ; xiv. carucates of land hidable. Land for as many ploughs. They are waste, except xi. villanes and xvii. bordars having vi. ploughs and a J. There are xxv. acres of meadow. M. In Pevrewic are ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. Colne holds it of the King, and he has there vi. villanes and ii. bordars with iii. ploughs. There are xii. acres of meadow. To this Manor adjoin iii. Berewites. Elleshope, Hanzedone, Eitune. There are ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. These V. Manors, Derelei, Mestesforde, Werchesuorde, Esseburne, and Peureuuic, with their Berewites, rendered, T. R. E., xxxii. pounds, and vi. sextaries and a J of honey ; now, xl. pounds of blanch silver. M. In Waletvne and Redlauestun Earl Algar had vi. carucates B°ere- of land hidable. Land for vii. ploughs. The King has two wite. r- a ... ploughs in demesne ; and iii. soke-men, and xxxiii. villanes, and X. bordars, having xii. ploughs. In Westone ii. parts of ii. carucates of land, and in Smalei and Chiteslei iv. bovates of land. A church and a priest there, and i. mill worth vi. shillings and viii. pence, and xl. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable here and there, vii. furlongs in length, and v. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. vi. pounds ; now, x. pounds. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 29 Fol. 2726, Col. I.) M. In Newetvn and Bretebi Algar had vii. carucates of land ^^- hidable. Land for v. ploughs. The King has i. plough and a ^ there, and xix. villanes, and i. bordar, having v. ploughs. There are xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pas- turable, ii. miles in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. and now val. c. shillings. M. In Milebvrne King Edward had vi. carucates of land hidable. Land for vi. ploughs. The King has i. plough there, and xx. villanes, and vi. bordars, having v. ploughs. A priest and a church there, and i. mill worth iii. shillings, and xxiv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and | mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. x. pounds ; now, vi. pounds ; yet it renders x. Berewites of this Manor. Fol. 272a, Col. II.] This Soc belongs to Mileburne, in Scaruesdele Wapen- take. Bareuue xii. bovates and a ^. In Suerchestune i. carucate. In Celerdestune i. carucate and a |. In Osmun- destune ii. carucates and ii. bovates, and Codetune iv. bovates ; together ii. carucates and vi. bovates. In Nor- manestune i. carucate. Land for xii. ploughs, viii. caru- cates and ii. bovates hidable. (A mistake here for vii. carucates, and vi. bovates and a J.) M. and B. In Rapendvne and Middeltune Earl Algar had vi. carucates of land hidable. Land for viii. ploughs. The King has ii. ploughs in demesne there, and xxxvii. villanes and iii. bordars having xii. ploughs. A church is there, and ii. priests with 1. plough. There are ii. mills, and xlii. acres of meadow. Pasturable wood i. mile in length, and ^ mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. xv. pounds; now, viii. pounds. S. In Wiulesleie ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. A soke. ii. soke-men and vii. villanes and i. bordar there have ii. ploughs and a J. There are xvi. acres of meadow. Pasturable wood i. furlong in length, and i. furlong in breadth. S. In Tichenhalle ii. carucates of land and ii. bovates and ii. parts of i. hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. ii. soke-men have i. plough there, and xxii, acres of meadow. 30 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 272*, Col. II.] S. In Trangesbi | a carucate of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. B. In Messeham ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. It is waste. There are xx. acres of meadow. Under-wood, i. furlong in length, and i. furlong in breadth. B. In Caldecote iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs, iii. villanes have ii. ploughs there, and xii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, x. shillings. This belongs to Cliftune in Stadford. S. In Englebi iii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. Soke in Rapendun. ii. soke-men have i. plough there, and iv. acres of meadow, and i. acre of brush-wood. Pasturable wood in Tichenhalle i. mile in length, and ^ a mile in breadth. M. In Badeqvella with viii. Berewites King Edward had xviii. carucates of land hidable. Land for xviii. ploughs. The King has now in demesne there vii. ploughs, and xxxiii. villanes, and ix. bordars. ii. priests are there, and a church, and under them ii. villanes and v. bordars. All these .have xi. ploughs, i. knight has xvi. acres of land there, and ii. bordars. There is i. mill worth x. shillings and viii. pence ; and i. lead-work, and Ixxx. acres of meadow. Under- wood i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. Of that land iii. carucates belong to the church. Henry de Ferrar claims i. carucate in Hadune. These are the Berewites of this Manor. Hadun, Holun, Reuslege, Bur- tune. Cranchesberie, Aneise, Maneis, Haduna. M. In Aisseford with the Berewites Ralunt, Langesdune, Hetesope, Caluoure, Basselau, Bubenenli, Berceles, Scelha- dun, Tadintune, Flagun, Prestecliue, Blacheuuelle, King Edward had xxii. carucates of land hidable, and i. carucate of land not hidable. The King has now in demesne there iv. ploughs, and xviii. villanes have v. ploughs. Land for xxii. ploughs. There is i. mill worth xii. pence and the site of i. mill, and i. lead-work, and xl. acres of meadow. Wood not pasturable, ii. miles in length, and ii. in breadth. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 31 Fol. 2734, Col. I.] M. In Hope with the Berewites Aidele, Estune, Scetune, Half of Offretune, Tidesuuelle, Stoche, Muchedesuuelle, King Edward had x. carucates of land hidable. Land for x. ploughs. Now XXX. villanes and iv. bordars have vi. ploughs there. A priest there, and a church, to which belongs i. carucate of land. There is i. mill worth v. shillings and iv. pence, and xxx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable in places, iv. miles and ii. furlongs in length, and ii. miles in breadth. These iii. Manors T. R. E. rendered xxx. pounds, and v. and a J sextaries of honey and v. loads of lead, of 1. tables ; now they renlder x. pounds and vi. shillings. William Peverel keeps it. M. In Langedenedele and in Tornesete Ligulf had iv. bovates of land hidable. In Lodeuorde Brun had iv. bovates of land. In Cheuenesuurde and Chiseuurde Luin i. carucate of land. In Ceolhal Eilmer iv. bovates of land. In Hetfelt iv. bovates. In Padefeld Leuine i. carucate of land. In Dentine Luenot ii. bovates of land. In Glosop Leuine iv. bovates of land. In Witfeld iv. bovates of land. In Hed- felt Eilmer iv. bovates of land. In Chendre Godric ii. bovates of land. Among them all, vi. carucates of land hidable, and xii. Manors. The whole of Langedenedele is waste. The wood there is not pasturable, fit for hunting. The whole viii. miles in length, and iv. miles in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings. M. In Begelie Godric had vi. bovates of land hidable. Land for vi. oxen. iii. villanes and v. bordars have there i. plough and i. acre of meadow., M. In Langeleie and Chetesuorde Leuenot and Chetel had X. bovates of land hidable. Land for x. oxen. This belongs to Ednesoure. William Pevrel keeps it for the King. V. villanes, and ii. bordars, have ii. ploughs, and i. acre of meadow there. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth, and a little under-wood. T. R. E. val. XX. shillings ; now, xvi. shillings. M. In Aivne Caschin had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. xii. villanes and vii. bordars have v. 32 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 273J, Col. I.] ploughs there. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length and i. in breadth. T. R. E. and now, val. xx. shillings. M. In Middeltvne Goded had iv. bovates of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. viii. villanes and i. bordar have ii. ploughs, and iv. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood there. T. R. E. and now, val. vi. shillings. M. In Maperlie Stapeluine had iv. bovates of land hidable. Land .... William Pevrel keeps it for the King. It is waste. There is J an acre of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iv. furlongs in length, and iv. in breadth T. R. E. val. xvi. shillings. In the same place is J a carucate of land of a Soke belonging to Spondune. A Manor of Henry's. M. In Tibecel Ligulf had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. William Pevrel keeps it for the King. Now in demesne there J a plough ; and ix. villanes having ii. ploughs. There is i, acre of meadow. Wood, pastur- able, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, x. shillings. Robert holds it. M. In Westvne, with the Berewites, Earl Algar had x. caru- cates and ii. bovates and a J of land hidable. Land for as many ploughs. Now in demesne there iii. ploughs ; and xxiv. villanes and vi. bordars having xii. ploughs, and iv. censers rendering xvi. shillings, ii. churches are there, and a priest, and i. mill worth xix. shillings and iv. pence, and a fish-pond, and a ferry worth xiii. shillings and iv. pence, and Ii. acres of meadow. Meadow, ^ a mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. viii. pounds ; now, xvi. pounds. Berewites of this Manor. B. In ^stun and Serdelau vi. bovates and a ^ hidable. There is i. plough in demesne ; and iv. villanes, and ii. bordars, with i. plough and iv. acres of meadow. Vcte- brand holds it of the King. It is worth v. shillings. > BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 33 II. THE LAND OF THE BISHOP OF CHESTER. MORELESTAN WAPENTAKE. SALLE HUNDRED. Fol. 273a, Col. II.] M. and B. In Salle and Draicot and Opeuuelle the Bishop of Cestre had xii. carucates of land hidable. Land for as many ploughs. The Bishop had there iii. ploughs, and xxix. villane.s, and xiii. bordars, having xiii. ploughs. A priest is there, and ii. churches, and i. mill worth xx. shillings, and i. fishery, and xxx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iii. furlongs in length, and i. furlong in breadth, and a little brush-wood. Ralph fitz Hubert holds Opeuuelle. S. In Aitone, xii. carucates of land hidable. Land for xii. ploughs. There are xxii. soke-men, and x. bordars under them. They have ix. carucates of this land and xiii. ploughs. The other iii. carucates of arable belong to the villanes. ii. sites of mills are there, and xl. acres of meadow. A little under-wood, T. R. E. val., viii. pounds ; now, the like. M. In Bvbedene and in its appendages v. carucates and ii. bovates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. The Bishop of Cestre has i. plough there, and xii. villanes, and iii. bordars, having vii; ploughs. A priest is there, and a church, and i. mill worth x. shillings, and xl. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. vii. pounds ; now, iv. pounds. III. THE LAND OF THE ABBEY OF BERTONE. M. In Vfre King Edward had x. carucates of land hidable. Land for xv. ploughs. To the same belong iii. berewites, Parva Vfre, Findre, Potlac. The Abbot of Bertone has now in demesne there v. ploughs and a J ; and xx. villanes, and X. bordars, having viii. ploughs, ii. sites of mills are there; and Ixxiii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, I a mile in length, and J in breadth ; and as much under- wood. T. R. E. val. XXV. pounds ; now, x. pounds. The sokes of the Manor : Snellestune xii. bovates. Beruerdes- cote iv. bovates. Dellingeberie iii. bovates. Hougen ii. 6 34 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 273a, Col. II.] bovates. Redesleie xii. bovates. Sudberie iv. bovates. Hiltune iv. bovates. Sudtun i. carucate. In the whole vi. carucates and ii. bovates of land hidable. M. In Apleby the Abbot of Berton had v. carucates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. Of this land Abbot Leuric made over to the Countess Goda i. carucate of land which the King now holds. In the same vill now in demesne are ii. ploughs ; and viii. villanes, and i bordar, with i. plough. T. R. E. val. XX. shillings ; now, Ix. shillings. M. In Wineshalle the Abbot of Bertone had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. Now in demesne are ii. ploughs ; and x. villanes having i. plough and a |. King William placed there vi. soke-men belonging to Rapendune who have i. plough, i. mill worth v. shillings and iv. pence is there ; and viii. acres of meadow. Under-wood i. mile in length, and i. furlong in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, Ix. shillings. M. In Cotvne (Cotes) Algar had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. The Abbot now has it of the King. Now in demesne there i. plough ; and vi. villanes, and iii. bordars, having ii. ploughs. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, XXX. M. In Stapenhille the Abbot of Bertone had iv. carucates and ii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now in demesne there ii. ploughs ; and xii. villanes having ii. ploughs. There are iv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth, T. R. E., and now, val. Ix. shillings. M. In Caldewelle ^Ifric had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now in demesne there i. plough ; and vi. villanes with i. plough. T. R. E., and now, val., xx. shillings. King William gave this Manor to the Monks for his beneficium. In Tichenhalle the Abbot of Bertone had v. bovates of land, and the i part of i. hidable He has there in demesne i. plough, and iv. villanes with i. plough, and viii. acres of meadow, and the i part of the pasturable wood of that Manor. It is worth x. shillings. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 35 nil. THE LAND OF EARL HUGH. Fol. 273*, Col. I.] M. In Marchetone Earl Siward had ix. carucates and a | of land hidable. Land for ix. ploughs. Earl Hugh has there ii. ploughs in demesne ; and xv. villanes and vii. bordars having v. ploughs. A priest is there, and a church, and i. mill worth vi. shillings and viii. pence, and i. fishery, and xxiv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J a mile in breadth, T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, iii. pounds. BS. In the berewites of Cheniuetun and Macheuorde and Adelardestreu iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. It is waste. There are xxx. acres of meadow ; and wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J a mile in breadth, i. carucate of these iv. belongs to Ednodestun, a Manor of Henry's. Gozelin holds it of the Earl, and Colle renders for it to Gozelin x. shillings and viii. pence. V. THE LAND OF ROGER OF POICTOU. In Svdtvne Steinulf had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. The Lord has there i. plough, and vi. villanes, and i. bordar with i. plough, i. mill worth -ii. shillings is there, and viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, J a mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. T, R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. S. In Bectune v. bovates and a ^ are hidable. Land for vi. oxen. A soke. ii. villanes have i. plough and i. acre of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and | a mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. v. shillings ; now, vi. shil- lings and iv. pence. M. In the ii. Lvnt Steinulf had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, viii. villanes have iii. ploughs and x. acres of meadow there. Wood, pasturable, iv. furlongs in length, and iv. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, X. shillings. 36 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 273*, Col. I.] M. In Steinesbi and in Tunestalle Steinulf had xii. bovates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now in demesne there ii. ploughs, and viii. villanes, and v. bordars having iv. ploughs. A priest there, with iii. bordars, and i. acre of meadow. Wood, pasturable, vi. furlongs in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxx. M. In Blanghesbi and Hertestaf Steinulf had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, i. soke-man and i. villane there, and iii. bordars, having i. plough. There are iii. atres of meadow. Wood, not pasturable, ii. furlongs in length, and ii. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, viii. shillings. Roger of Poictou held these lands ; now they are in the King's hands. Fol. 273*, Col. II.-| M. In Winefeld Elnod ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. Robert holds it of Earl Alan under William Peurel, and has i. plough. A priest there, and viii. villanes, and ii. bordars, with iii. ploughs. There are four acres of meadow. It was, and is, worth xx. shillings. VI. THE LAND OF HENRY DE FERIERES. HAMELESTAN WAPENTAKE (HIGH PEAK AND WIRKSWORTH HUNDREDS). Fol. 274a, Col. I.] In Winbroc Chetel had v. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings. Ms. II. In Winsterne Leuing and Rauen had xii. bovates of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. There Cola the man of Henry has vii. villanes, and xii. bordars having iv. ploughs. Under-wood, | a mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. xx. shillings. Ms. II. In Collei Suain and Vctred had ii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. ii. villanes and i. bordar have i. plough there. There are iv. acres of meadow. Under-wood, ^ a mile in length, and ii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. x. shillings. Suan holds it. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 37 Fol. 274a, Col. 1.) Ms. II. In Eltvne Caschin and Uctred ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. plougiis. Now in demesne there i. plough; and ix. villanes, and x. bordars, having iv. ploughs, and xii. acres of meadow. Under-wood, iii. fur- longs in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. xl. shillings. M. In Brazinctvn Siuuard had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now in demesne there iii. ploughs ; and xvi. villanes, and ii. bordars have vi. ploughs and xxx. acres of meadow. Under- wood iii. furlongs in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. vi. pounds ; now, iii. pounds. M. In Bradebvrn Eluric had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and xii. villanes, and iv. bordars have iv. ploughs. A priest there, and a church ; and xii. acres of meadow. Under- wood iii. furlongs in length, and ii. in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xxx. shillings. Ms. VII. In Tizinctvn Vlchel, Edric, Gamel, Vluiet, Wictric, Leuric, Goduin had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now in demesne there iii. ploughs ; and xii. villanes, and viii. bordars having iv. ploughs, and i. mill worth iii. shillings ; and xxx. acres of meadow. Under-wood i. mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xl. shillings. M. In Nevtvne Osmer had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. It is waste. There are viii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings. Ms. II. In Hortedvn Godwin and Ligulf had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. There are xvi. acres of meadow. Under-wood iii. furlongs in length, and ii. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings. M. In Salham Cole had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. There are xvi. acres of meadow. Under-wood J a mile in length, and J in breadth. T. R. E^ val. xl. shillings. M. In Pilesberie and Lodouuelle Elsi had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. There are xii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. x. shillings. 38 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 274a, Col. I.] M. and B. In Sothelle and Walestune Gamel had vi. caru- cates of land hidable. Land for as many ploughs. Now in demesne there i. plough ; and iii. villanes, and iii. bordars having i. plough, and v. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iii. miles and a J in length, and ii. miles and a ^ in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, x. shillings. Godric holds it. Fol. 274a, Col. II.] M. In Etelavve Eluric had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There are iv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ^ a mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. Under -wood, of the same extent. T. R. E. val. XX. shillings ; now, ii. shillings. WALECROS WAPENTAKE (REPTON AND GRESLEY HUNDREDS). M. In Crocheshalle Siward had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for viii. ploughs. Now in demesne there ii. ploughs, and XXXV. villanes, and xi. bordars, having viii. ploughs, ii. mills worth xviii. shillings there ; and xxii. acres of meadow. Under-wood, ii. furlongs in length, and i. fur- long in breadth. T. R. E. val. iii. pounds ; now, iv. pounds. Roger holds it. In Ednunghalle i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. iv. villanes have i. plough there. Under- wood, iii. furlongs in length, and i. furlong in breadth. M. In Streitvn Eluric had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. iv. villanes have ii. ploughs there, and i. mill worth v. shillings, and x. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. XX. shillings ; now, xv. shillings. Roger holds it. M. In Chetvn Siuuard had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. Now in demesne there iii. ploughs ; and xiv. villanes, and ii. bordars having iv. ploughs, and xxiv. acres of meadow. Under-wood, i. furlong in length, and i. furlong in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. Ix. shillings. Nigel holds it. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 39 Fol. 274a, Col. II.) M. In Bolvn Eluric had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now in demesne there iv. ploughs ; and viii. villanes, and viii. bordars, having iii. ploughs, and xviii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. furlong in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. c. shillings : now, iv. pounds. M. In Linctvne Leuric had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. It is waste. Under-wood, i. furlong in length, and ^ in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings. N. In Wivleslei Aluric had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste, iii. villanes have v. ploughing oxen there. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings; now, xvi. shil- lings. M. In Stantvn Alwin had | a carucate of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. i. soke-man and i. bordar have i. plough, and x. acres of meadow there. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, x. shillings. M. In Heorteshorne Aluric had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. It is waste. Wood, pasturable, J a mile in length, and J in breadth. As much arable land. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, x. shillings. M. In another Heorteshorne Aluric had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. Wood, pas- turable, I a mile in length, and ^ a mile in breadth. Arable land, of the same extent. T. R. E. val. xl. shil- lings ; now, X. shillings. Ms. II. In Merstvn Brun and Elric had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. Now in demesne there ii. ploughs ; and xviii. villanes, and v. bordars having v. ploughs. A priest there, and a church, and i. mill worth vi. shillings and v. pence. There are 1. acres of meadow, and i. acre of under-wood. It is worth c. shillings. The monks hold it of Henry. M. In Dvbrige Earl Edvin had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for vi. ploughs. Now in demesne there iii. ploughs ; and XXX. villanes, and x. bordars having vii. ploughs. A 40 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 274S, Col. I.] church there, and a priest, and i. mill worth x. shillings, and xlviii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J a mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. viii. pounds ; now, c. shillings. The monks hold it of Henry. M. In Farvlvestvn Leuenot, Ulmer, Baldric, and Vluric had ii. carucates and a ^ of land hidable. Land for xx. oxen. Now xii. villanes and viii. bordars have iii. ploughs and x. acres of meadow there. It is worth xl. shillings. M. In Scrotvn with iii. berewites, Tochi has vi. carucates of land hidable. Land for vii. ploughs. Now xxxii. villanes, and xxvi. bordars, have xii. ploughs there. A priest there, and a church, and i. mill, and the site of another mill. In demesne now iv. ploughs, and a certain knight iii. ploughs, k and a cxx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iv. furlongs in length, and ii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. viii. \. pounds ; now, x. pounds. G. Alselin claims it. M. In Estvne Leuenot had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now in demesne there iii. ploughs ; and viii. villanes, and iv. bordars, having ii. ploughs, and xxiv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, \ a mile in length, and \ in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xl. Alcher holds it. Ms. II. In Sapertvne Godric and Leuin Gilt had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. Now v. villanes have i. plough there. Wood, pasturable, iv. furlongs in length, and ii. in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. xx. shillings. Roger holds it. M. In Svdberie Godric and Vluric and Elmer had ii. carucates, less \ a bovate, hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now xiv. villanes and iv. bordars have iii. ploughs there. There a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth vi. shillings and a hundred eels ; and xxii. acres of meadow, and a small piece of under-wood. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xx. Alcher holds it. S. In the same place | a bovate of land, and the \ part of i. 4- bovate hidable. Soke in Scroftun. A certain old woman held it. Now Alcher holds it. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 41 Fol. 274*, Col. I.] M. In Broctvne Vluric had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough ; and x. villanes and ii. bordars having iii. ploughs, and xviii. acres of meadow, and iv. acres of pasture. Ms. II. In Svmmersale Ormer and Erniet had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough ; and v. villanes and i. bordar have ii. ploughs, and xiv. acres of meadow, and iv. acres of pasture. Wood, pasturable, ^ a mile in length, and | in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. Ix. shillings. Alcher holds it. M. In another Summersale Elric had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough, vi. bordars have i. plough and xxiv. acres of meadow there. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, i. mark of silver. Alric holds it. Ms. VIII. In Barctvne Godric and anbther Godric, Edric, Leuenot, Elfeg, Ledmer, Dunninc, and Eduard had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs ; and xix. villanes, and xi. bordars having vii. ploughs. There a priest, and a church, and ii. mills worth xx. shillings, and Ixiv. acres of meadow. T. R. E., and now, val. iv. pounds. Radulph holds it. M. In Alchementvne Vluiet had i. carucate and a | of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and viii. villanes, and vii. bordars having ii. ploughs and xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xl. shillings. Radulph holds it. M. In Beneleie Vluiet and Vlchel had one carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. T. R. E. val. XX. shillings ; now, xi. shillings. Radulph holds it. Fol.274*, Col. II.] Ms. II. In Eisse Vlchel and Auic and Hacon had xvi. bovates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and vii. villanes having i. plough. There are xviii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, XXX. Robert holds it. Ms. II. In Toxenai Vlchetel and Auic had xii. bovates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. 7 42 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol- 274^, Col. II.] plough, and iv. villanes, and v. bordars having ii. ploughs and a |. v. farmers render v. shillings there, and ii. soke- men v. shillings. There are xxxiii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shilling ; now, xxx. shillings. Hugh holds it. Ms. V. In Svdtvne Tori, Elwold, Vnban, Lewin, and Edric had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs, and ix. villanes having vii. ploughs. There a church, and a priest, and i. mill worth X. shillings, and xxiv. acres of meadow. T. R. E., and now, val. Ix. shillings. Wazelin holds it. M. In Brailesford Earl Wallef had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and xxiv. villanes, and iii. bordars have v. ploughs. There a priest and J a church, and i. mill worth x. shillings and viii. pence ; and xi. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xl. shillings. Elfin holds it. S. In Holintune and Sireleie iii. bovates of land hidable. Land for |- a plough. M. In Holintvne Lepsi, and Elfag, Auic, and three other thanes had i. carucate and a ^ of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. xi. villanes and vii. bordars have vii. ploughs and viii. acres of meadow there, and a little under-wood. T. R. E., and now, val. xl. shillings. Ms. V. In Sirelei Chetel, and Ulmer, Turgis, Elric, .^Elgar, Vluiet and Lepsi had ii. carucates of land, less J a bovate hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and vi. villanes and vii. bordars having iii. ploughs. There a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth ii. shillings. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xl.. Ms. II. In Braidelei Aluric and Lewin had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, xi. villanes and vi. bordars have iv. ploughs there, and i. acre of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 43 Fol. 2744, Col. II.] Ms. II. In Geldeslei Ulchetel and Godwin had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs and a |, and one villane having ^ a plough. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. Cola holds it. Ms. IV. In Hiltvne Vluric, and Vlf, and Vbe, and Elric had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and xii. villanes and vii. bordars having iv. ploughs There ii. mills worth x. shillings; and Ix. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. vi. pounds; now, iii. pounds. Robert holds it. Ms. III. In Hoge Vlsi, and Godvin, and Vlsi had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs and ii, oxen. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and xi. villanes and v. bordars having ii. ploughs, and i. mill worth ix. shillings ; and xl. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xl. Sasuualo holds it. In Hatune vi. bovates and a |^ of soke ; and i. bovate and a 1^ of thane-land. This belongs to Scrotune. Ms. II. In Hatvn Edric, and Collinc, and Baldric had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough, v. villanes and v. bordars have ii. ploughs there, and xx. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. Sasuualo holds it. M. In Aitvn and Segessale Vluric had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, v. villanes and v. bordars have iii. ploughs there, and i. mill worth iv. shillings, and xvi. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and ^ in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. Alcher holds it. M. In Merchetvne Aided had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and xviii. villanes and v. bordars have iii. ploughs and xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. and now, val. Ix. shillings. 44 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 2753, Col. I.] M. In Bubedene Vlchil had vi. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough, iii. bordars and i. servus have i. plough and a I there and xx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, I a mile in length, and | a mile in breadth ; and as much under-wood. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. Elfin holds it. Ms. III. In Snellestvne Leuenot, Elfric, and Saulf had ii.caru- cates and ii. bovates of land, and the ^ part of ii. bovates hidable. In the same place ^ a carucate of land, the soke in Ouere, and iii. bovates of land the soke in Rouecestre, and v. bovates of land and ii. parts of ii. bovates which belong to Nordberie. Land for iv. ploughs amongst the whole. Now ix. villanes and ix. bordars and i. servus have ' vi. ploughs there, and 1. acres of meadow. Wood, pas- turable, i. mile in length, and ^ in breadth. T. R. E. val. viii. pounds ; now, xl. shillings. Radulf holds it. In Cobelei Siuuard had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and iv. villanes and iv. bordars and i. servus have i. plough. There a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth xii. pence, and viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. c. shillings ; now, xl shillings. Radulph holds it. Ms. II. In Boilestvn Godric and Leuenot had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and viii. villanes and viii. bordars having iii. ploughs, and i. mill worth xii. pence, and vi. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J a mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. Roger holds it. Ms. II. In Faitvne and Stertune Vlchil and Wodi had ii. parts of i. carucate of land hidable. Land for vi. oxen. Now xi. villanes and x. bordars have vi. ploughs there, and i. mill worth viii. shillings, and viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iv. furlongs in length, and iv. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. .c Fol. 275a Col. I.] M. In Nortberie and Roschintone Siuuard had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and xvii. villanes and vii. bordars having iv. ploughs. There a priest, and a church, and 1. mill worth X. shillings, and xxiv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. c. shillings ; now, Ix. Henry holds it. In the same Roschintun i. carucate of land hidable, belonging to Rouecestre. Now ii. villanes are there. Ms. II. In Osmundestvne Wallef and Ailiet had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, viii. villanes and iv. bordars have v. ploughs there, and ii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xl. shillings. Elfin holds it. M. In Widerdestvne and Duluestune Earl Edwin had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. ix. villanes and iv. bordars have ii. ploughs there, and ii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and i. mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. ix. shillings: now, xx. shillings. Orm holds it. These ii. vills are of the king's farm in Rouecestre, except i. bovate which lies in Osmun- destune. M. In Torverdestvne and in Bubedune Vlchel had v. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough, iii. villanes and iii. bordars have i. plough and a ^ there, and xx. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood. T. R, E. val. xl. shillings ; now, XX. shillings. Elfin holds it. Ms. II. In Gheveli Two Ligulfi had xii. bovates of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. vii. villanes and iii. bordars have iii. ploughs there. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xl. shillings. Alsi holds it. M. In Redeslei Brune had xii. bovates of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. There now in demesne i. plough ; and vi. villanes and ii. bordars have ii. ploughs and ii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and | a mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xx. 46 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 275a, Col. II.) shillings. John holds it. The Abbot claims sokage of this vill. Laves , Ms. II. In Oswardestvne Ernwi and Leuuin had xii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and xii. villanes and iv. bordars having iii. ploughs. Wood, pasturable, i a mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xl. shillings. John holds it. M. In Tvrverdestvne Hedul had xii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and vi. villanes and iii. bordars have ii. ploughs and xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, | a mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. four pounds ; now, xl. shillings. Robert holds it. M. In Bradestvne Leuenot Sterre had iii. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne i. plough ; and ii. villanes have v. oxen in ploughs, and iii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. x. shillings ; now, iv. shillings. Herbert holds it. Waste Waste M. In Dvvelle, and Bradelei, and Holebroc, and Muleforde, and Waste Machenie, and in Herdebi, Siuuard had vii. carucates of land hidable, and the I part of i. carucate. Land for vii. ploughs and the ^ part of i. plough. There now in demesne iii. ploughs ; and xxxii. villanes, and viii. bordars, and x. servi having viii. ploughs and xx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iv. miles in length, and ii. in breadth. There a priest, and a church, and ii. mills worth viii. shillings. T. R. E. val. ix, pounds ; now, vii. pounds. In Herdebi (qu. Hardwicke) Henry has the ^ part of i. carucate. M. In Spondvne Stori had v. carucates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs ; and xiv. villanes and ii. bordars having iv. ploughs. There a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth v. shillings and iv. pence. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 47 Fol. 276a, Col. I.] S. In Cedesdene iv. carucates and a ^ of land, and ii. parts of i. bovate hidable. Land for as many ploughs. Now xi. soke-men, and x. villanes, and v. bordars have vi. ploughs there, and xxviii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ^ a mile in length, and v. furlongs in breadth. Under-wood of the same extent. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, iii. pounds. M. In Braideshale Siward had v. carucates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and xxi. villanes and vii. bordars having viii. ploughs, i. knight has i. plough there. There a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth xiii. shillings and iv. pence ; and xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, viii. furlongs in length, and viii. in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. iv. pounds. Robert holds it. Morleia. There Siward had the ^ part of ii. carucates hidable. Henry has iv. villanes with i. plough there. Wood, pasturable, iv. furlongs in length, and iii. in breadth. M. In Pirelaie Dunning had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. There ii. acres of meadow, and of under-wood iii. furlongs in length, and u. in breadth. T. R. E. val, xx. shillings. M. In Longesdvne' Colne had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. It is waste. There vi. acres of meadow. Under-wood ii. miles in length, and i. mile m breadth. T. R. E. val. xxx. shillings. M. In Stantvne Godric and Rauen had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough, iv. villanes and vi. bordars have iii. ploughs there. There xxiv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. mile in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. x. shillings. Berewites. B. In Barcouere i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. There viii. acres of meadow. Under- wood ^ a mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth ; the h part pasturable. T. R. E. val. viii. shillings. 48 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 276^, Cul. I.] M. In Hortel Chetel had iv. bovates of land hidable. It is waste. There iii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. v. shillings and iv. pence. M. Giolgrave Colle and Chetel had xii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs ; and i. villane with i. plough, and i. mill worth v. shillings and iv. pence and iv. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xxxii. shillings ; now, xvi. shillings. M. In Middeltvne Dunninc and Elvinc had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. There are ii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings. M. In Gratvne Chetel had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i plough ; and iv. villanes and ii. bordars have ii. ploughs. There iii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. x. shillings. M. In Wruenele and Muchedesuuelle Siuuard had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. It is waste. There XX. acres of meadow. Under-wood i. mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. M. In Chetelestvne Vlsi and Godwin had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and v. villanes and v. bordars with i. plough, and i. mill worth v. shillings, and a little under-wood. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. Gulbert holds it. In Turulveston Geoffrey Alselin holds of Henry i. carucate of land. It is waste ; but yet val. iii. shillings. M. In Barvve Godwin and Colegrines had iii. bovates and a i of land hidable. It is waste, i. villane has iv. oxen and viii. acres of meadow there. T. R. E. val. xiii. shillings and iv. pence ; now, ii. shillings. Ms. III. In Sorchestvn Gamel.and Vlestan, and Vlf, and Vluiet had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne i. plough, and vi. villanes having i. plough. There Ixviii. acres of meadow, and i. site of a mill. T. R. E., and now, val. xx. shillings. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 49 Fol. 27si, Col. II.] M. In Celardestvne Vlsi had iv. bovates of land hidable. Land for J a plough. It is waste. There iv. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xii. shillings ; now, iii. shillings. Amalric holds it. Ms. II. In Erlestvne Golegrim and Rauenchel had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and vii. villanes with i. plough. There XX. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, xl. shillings. M. and B. In Tviforde and Steintvne Leuric had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and iv. villanes and v. bordars with i. plough, and i. mill worth v. shillings, and xxiv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. furlong in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. viii. shillings ; now, iv. pounds. Ms. II. In the same place Godwin and Vlfstan had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. M. In Osmvndestvne Osmund had iii. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne i. plough, and i. villane rendering ii. shillings and viii. pence. There xx. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. Of these monies ii. parts are the King's ; the i, Henry's. M. In Codetvne Osmund had iv. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough, ii. villanes have i. plough there, and iii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. v. shillings ; now, ' ii. shillings and vi. pence. B. In Osmundestune iii. bovates of land hidable, belonging to Codetune. M. In Sedenefeld Vlchel had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne i. plough, and ii. villanes having i. plough, and vi. acres of meadow. T. R. E., and now, val. x. shillings. William holds it. Ms. III. In Normantvne Leuric, Gamel, and Teodric had vi. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne i. plough, and i. villane rendering xii. pence. There xii. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood. 50 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 27s*, Col. II.] T. R. E. val. XX. shillings ; now, x. shillings. Amalric holds it. In the same place ii. bovates of land hidable belonging to Tuiforde. M. In Iretvne Godwin had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough, and vi. villanes and vi. bordars having ii. ploughs. There vi. acres of meadow, and i. mill worth xvi. pence. Wood, pasturable, I a mile in length, and | in breadth. T. R.-E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. Orme holds it. Soke M. In Estvne Vctebrand had i. carucate of land and ii. bovates and a | hidable, and v. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. vi. shillings ; now, viii. shillings. Ms. V. In Bvrnvlfestvne and Bereuuardescote Gamel had x. bovates ; Aluric, ii. bovates ; Elric, ii. bovates ; Ledmer, i. bovate ; Leuing, i. bovate. In the whole, ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs, and viii. villanes and i. bordar having iv. ploughs. There are xxxvi. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. Henry holds it. M. In Mogintvn Gamel had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough ; and viii. villanes and viii. bordars having ii. ploughs. There a church, and a priest, and i. mill worth iii. shillings, and iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and a | in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, XX. shillings. Chetel holds it. M. In Merchenestvne Gamel had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for vi. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough, and vi. villanes and iv. bordars have i. plough. There xiv. acres of meadow, and the site of i. mill. Wood, pasturable, J a mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. Robert and Roger holds it. M. In Delbebi Godric had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and vi. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 51 Fol. 276a, Col. I.l villanes and i. bordar with ii. ploughs. There a priest and a church, and xx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and ^ a mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, Ix. shillings. Robert holds it. Ms. V. In Etewelle Gamel, Edric, Vluiet, Eluric, Eluuine had V. carucates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs, and xiv. villanes and viii. bordars having viii. ploughs. There a priest, and a church, and XXX. acres of meadow. T. R. E., and now, val. c. shillings. Sasuualo holds it. M. In Radbvrne Vlsi had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs, and vi. villanes and v. bordars having iii. ploughs. There xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, J a mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. Ralph fitz Hubert claims the J part of Radburne, and the Wapentake bears witness for him. Hennesoure. In Morelei Seward had the J part of ii. carucates of land hidable. Now Henry has it. In Ednesovre Leuenot and Chetel had ii. carucates of land for ii. manors. Henry now iv. carucates hidable, and as many ploughs for ploughing. There x. villanes, and vii. bordars with vi. ploughs and i. acre of meadow. Formerly xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. VII. THE LAND OF WILLIAM PEVEREL. Fol. 276a, Col. II.] M. In Belesovre Leuric had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and xiv. villanes and iii. bordars having iv. ploughs and viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, Ix. Robert holds it. M. In Glapewelle Leuric had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough, viii. villanes having ii. ploughs there. T. R. E. val. XX. shillings ; now, x. shillings. Serlo holds it. 52 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 276a, Col. II.] M. In Esnotrewic Aldene had | a carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne i. plough, and vi. villanes and i. bordar having iii. ploughs. There a site of i. mill, and wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. Drogo holds it. M. In Normentvne Elfag had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough, and vi. villanes and i. bordar with i. plough. There v. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and iv. furlongs in length, and ii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, x. Eduin holds it. M. and B. In Sirelvnt and in Vftune Leuric had ii. carucates and a I of land hidable. Land for as many ploughs. Now, five villanes and i. bordar have ii. ploughs there. Wood, pasturable, ix. furlongs in length, and iv. in breadth. T. R. E. Val. xvi. shillings ; now, x. shillings and viii. pence. Warner holds it. Ms. VI. In Cotenovre and Hainoure and Langeleie and Smite- cote viii. thanes had vii. carucates of land hidable. Land for as many ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs ; and xi. villanes, and ii. bordars, and iii. soke-men having v. ploughs and a |. There a church, and i. mill worth xii. pence, and xxxv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xli. shillings and iv. pence. Warner holds it. In Pechefers. Ms. II. Gernebern and Hundinc held the land of the castle of William Peverel. There they had ii. carucates of land hidable. There is land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne iv. ploughs, and iii. villanes with i. plough, and viii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, 1. shillings. Ms. III. In Bradewelle Leuing and Sprot and Ouuine had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and viii. villanes having ii. ploughs. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 53 I'd. 276a, Col. II.] M. In Heselebec and Leitun Lewine had iii. carucates and a ^ of land hidable. Land for as many ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough, and iii. villanes with i a plough. There ii. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood. T. R. E. val. XX. shillings ; now, iv. shillings. Ms. III. In Hochelai Ernui, Hundulf, Vluric ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. It is waste. M. In Habenai Suain had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. M. In Watrefeld Lewin had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. VIII. THE LAND OF WALTER DE AINCVRT. Fol. 2766, Col. I.] M. In Mortvne and Oughedestune and Wistanestune Suain the younger (Cilt) had xi. bovates and a J and viii. acres of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and xiv. villanes having v. ploughs and a J, and iv. servi. There a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth vi. shillings and viii. pence, with the keeper of the mill, and viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and a |- in length, and as much in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. iv. pounds. Walter de Aincurt holds it. M. In Brandvne and Wadescel Wade had iii. bovates and a ^ and iv. acres of land hidable. Land for ^ a plough. Walter has now in demesne there i. plough ; and i. villane and iii. bordars having | a plough, and ii. acres and i. perch of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and a J in length, and i. furlong and a ^ in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. v. shillings and iv. pence. Concerning this land, Walter vouches the King as warrantor, and Henry de Ferrariis as giving livery. M. In Pinneslei and Caldecotes and Wilelmestorp Suain Cilt had ii. carucates of land, less | a bovate hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Walter has now in demesne there ii. ploughs, and xii. villanes and iii, bordars having vi. ploughs. To 54 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 276*, Col. I.] this Manor belong ii bovates of land hidable. Soke in Winnefelt, and there are v. soke-nien, and a priest, and a church ; and in Topetune i. bovate of land and the ^ part of one bovate is hidable ; and there is i. soke-man, and viii. villanes, and i. bordar, with iii. ploughs and a ^. There are iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. iv. pounds. M. In Holmesfelt Suain had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now x. villanes have iii. ploughs there, and i. acre of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. M. In Helmetvne Suain Cilt had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. Walter has now in demesne there i. plough, and xxxvi. villanes and ii. bordars having ix. ploughs. There a priest, and a church. Under-wood i. mile in length, and J in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings, now, vii. pounds. M. In Holtvne Suain Cilt had iii. bovates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, xviii. villanes and vi. bordars have viii. ploughs there. T. R. E. val. x. shillings ; now, Ix. IX. THE LAND OF GOISFRID ALSELIN. Fol. 276*, Col. II.] M. In .(Elvvoldestvn and Emboldestune and Torulfestune and Aleuuoldestune Tochi had x. carucates of land hidable. Land for xiv. ploughs. Goisfrid Alselin has now in demesne there ii. ploughs, and a certain knight of his i. plough, xxxii. villanes have xv. ploughs there. There a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth xii. shillings, and i. smith, and Iii. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood. T, R. E. val. xii. pounds ; now, x. pounds. M. In Etewelle Dunstan had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. Now i. villane has ii. oxen in a plough there. There vi. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, iv. shillings and iv. pence. Azelinus holds it. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 55 Fol. 2764, Col. 11.) M. In Ednodestvne and Hoilant Tochi had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough, and ii. villanes, and ii. bordars, and | a church, and ii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth ; and another wood | a mile in length, and J in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, XXXV. shillings. To this Manor belong ii. bovates and a ^ of land hidable. Soke is in Holintune. Land for ii. oxen and a |. M. In Eghintvne Tochi had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for vi. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough, and ii. villanes, and v. bordars, having i. plough. There a priest, and a church ; and i. mill worth v. shillings ; and vi. farmers rendering xiv. shillings and iv. pence. There ii. hundred acres of meadow, and a little under- wood. T. R. E. val. viii. pounds; now, Ix. shillings. Azelinus holds it. S. In Braidestune i. bovate of land hidable. Land for i. ox. A soke, and waste, and it renders ii. spurs. There i. acre of meadow. Gislebert de Gand has there ii. carucates of land i. mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. M. In Ochebroc Tochi had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now x. villanes and ii. bordars have iii. ploughs there ; and iv. farmers rendering xiv. shillings. There v. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds; now, xl. shillings. Goisfrid holds it. X. THE LAND OF RALPH FITZ HUBERT. M. Echintvne Leuenot had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. There Ralph Fitz Hubert has now in demesne i. carucate, and xiv. villanes having v. ploughs. A priest is there, and i. servus, and i. mill worth iii. shillings, and viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles and i. furlong in length, and i. mile and ^ a furlong in breadth. T. R. E. val. vii. pounds ; now, Ix. shillings. 56 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 277a, Col. I.] S. In Moresburg ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. A soke. There xiii. soke-men have now v. ploughs and iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and a J in length, and i. mile in breadth. S. In Bettune iv. bovates of land hidable. Land for as many oxen. A soke. It is waste. M. and B. In Barleburg and Witeuuelle Leuenot had vi. carucates of land hidable. Land for viii. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs, and x. soke-men, and x. villanes, and xxxvi. bordars having viii. ploughs. There a priest, and a church, and i. servus and ii. mills worth iii. shillings. There iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and i. in breadth. Under-wood i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. vi. pounds. Robert holds it. In Clvne ii. bovates of land hidable belonging to this Manor. M. and B. In Paltretvne and Scardeclif and Tunestal Leuenot had vi. carucates and ii. bovates of land hidable. Land for viii. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs, and x. villanes, and i. soke-man, and ii. bordars, having iii. ploughs, and i. farmer with i. plough. There i. mill worth iv. shillings, and viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and ^ a mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. vi. pounds ; now, 1. shillings. Raynouuard holds it. M. In Dochemanestvn Leuenot had iv. carucates and ii. bovates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. Now xviii. farmers have V. ploughs there. There viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xix. shillings. Goisfrid holds it. M. In Stratvne and Tegestou and Henlege Leuenot had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough and a ^, and vi. villanes and iv. bordars having iii. ploughs, and viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. Robert holds it. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 57 Fol. 277a, Col. II.] M. In another Stratvne Leuric had ii. bovates and a | of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. Now ii. viilanes and iv. bordars have ii. ploughs and ii. acres of meadow there. Wood, pasturable, iii. furlongs in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. iii. shillings. Robert holds it. Ms. II. In Essovre Leuric and Leuenot had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now iii. farmers and xiv. bordars have iii. ploughs there. There now in demesne i. plough, and a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth xvi. pence. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and ii. in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xxx. shillings. Serlo holds it. M. In Nevtvne Leuric and Leuenot had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough, and xiii. viilanes and iv. bordars having iii. ploughs. There a priest having i. bordar, and vii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, xxx. shillings. Radulph holds it. Ms. II. In Crice and Scochetorp Leuric and Leuenot had iv. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne i. plough, and x. viilanes and ii. bordars having iii. ploughs. There iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iii. miles in length, and i. mile in breadth, and i. lead-work (plumbaria). T. R E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. Radulph holds it. In Werchesuuorde and Lede and Taneslege iv. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. Now iii. viilanes and vii. bordars have i. plough there, and ii. acres and a ^ of meadow. Wood, pasturable, |- a mile in length, and as much in breadth. T. R. E. val. x. shillings ; now, vii. shillings. This land lies in Crice, but the hide is rendered in Hamelestan Wapentake. S. In Wistanestvne iii. bovates and a J of land are hidable. Land for i. plough. Soke in Crice. Now i. villane and vi. bordars have ii. ploughs there. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J in breadth. T. R. E. val. x. shillings ; now, V. shillings. Leuinc holds it. 9 58 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 277a, Col. II.] S. In Ougedestvn ii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. Wood, pasturable, | a mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. Soke in Crice, and it is waste. B. In Vffentvne iv. bovates of land are hidable. Land for J a plough. Berewite in Pentric. It is waste. There ii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ^ a mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. Nigel holds it. M. In Middeltone Leuenot and his brother had i. carucate of land which was hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. This Manor has i. mile in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. Ms. II. In Hereseige Leuenot and Leuric had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. To this Manor belong iv. berewites, Banford, Heret, | Offretune, ii. parts of Middletune. In these ii. carucates of land are hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now viii. villanes and ii. bordars have V. ploughs there. Wood, pasturable here and there, ii. miles in length, and ii. miles in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. M. In Hortil Leuenot had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now v. villanes and iii. bordars have iii. ploughs there. There viii. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, xii. shillings. Colle holds it. M. In Boletvne Leuenot had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough ; and ii. soke-men and iv. villanes have i. plough. There x. acres of meadow. Pasture iv. furlongs in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. T. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. M. In Willetvne Leuric had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now iv. villanes and ii. bordars have iv. ploughs there, and xxx. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. M. In Langelei Leuenot had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for vi. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough ; and ii. villanes and iv. bordars have ii. ploughs. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth, and a little under-wood. T. R. E. val. c. shillings ; now, xl. shillings. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 59 Fol. 277a, Col. II.] Ms. II. In Belidene Leuric and Leuenot had iv. carucate.s of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough, and vi. villanes have i. plough. There xvi. acres of meadow. Under-wood i a mile in length, and i. furlong in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xii. shillings and vi. pence. M. In Englebi had i. carucate of land and the i part of i. carucate hidable. Land for i. plough and a |. There now in demesne i. plough ; and iii. villanes and ii. bordars have i. plough. There vii. acres of meadow, and the site of i. mill. Val. X. shillings. Fol. 277*, Col. I.] Ms. II. In Cliptvne Leuric and Leuenot had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. Now viii. villanes and V. bordars have iv. ploughs there, and iv. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, x. shillings. Ms. II. In Ripelie and Pentric Leuenot had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne iii. ploughs ; and xiii. villanes and iii. bordars have iii. ploughs. There iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. iv. pounds ; now, 1. shillings. S. In Bareuue xii. bovates of land are hidable. Soke to Mileburne. There a priest and a church, and i. soke-man with J a plough and xviii. acres of meadow. In Werredune Leuenot ii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. Now vi. villanes have i. plough there, and i. acre of meadow, and under-wood. T. R. E., and now, val. v. shillings. XI. THE LAND OF RADULPH DE BVRVN. M In Westvne Visi had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. There now in demesne i. plough ; and vi. villanes and vi. bordars have ii. ploughs. There viii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and | in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. Gulbert holds it of Radulph de Burun. 60 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 277^, Col. I.] M. In Horselei Turgar had iii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. There now in demesne ii. ploughs ; and xix. villanes and iv. bordars having vi. ploughs. There Ix. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. c. shillings ; now, Ix. shillings. A Knight of Radulph's holds it. M. In Denebi Osmond had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now vii. villanes and i. bordar have iii. ploughs there. There xii. acres of meadow, and the site of i. mill. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. c. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. A knight of Radulph's holds it. M. In Halvn Dunstan had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. There now in demesne i. plough ; and v. villanes and iv. bordars have ii. ploughs. There xvi. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, vii. furlongs in length, and vi. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. xx. shillings. M. In Herdebi Turgar had v. parts of i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. There vi. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and | in breadth. T. R. E. val. xxx. shillings ; now, viii. shillings. XII. THE LAND OF ASCUIT MUSARD. Fol. 277^, Col. II.] M. In Barleie Hacon had ii. parts of i. carucate of land hidable. Land for J a plough. Now vi. villanes and i. bordar have i. plough there. There ii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and a | in length, and viii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. x. shillings. Ascuit Musard holds it. M. In Stavelie Hacon had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now Ascuit has in demesne there iii. ploughs ; and xxi. villanes and vii. bordars having iv. ploughs. There a priest, and a church, and i. mill worth V. shillings and iv. pence. There Ix. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and a | in length, and the same in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. vi. pounds. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 6 1 Fol. 277!), Col. 11.) M. In Holvn, and Wadescel, and Brantune, Dunninc had x. carucates and a J of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. Now viii. villanes and v. bordars have iii. ploughs there. There iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and a J, and i. furlong in length, and ii. furlongs and a i in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, x. shillings. Ascuit holds it. M. In Brantvne and Wadescel Branuuine had vii. bovates of land and iv. acres hidable. Land for i. plough. One ""J plough now in demesne there ; and iii. villanes and i. not of ^ ° ' whom, border have i. plough. There v. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile and a J in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. x. shillings. Ascuit holds it. M. In Chinewolde Maresc Aluuold had ^ a bovate of land hidable. It is waste. There ^ an acre of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and xxx. perches in breadth. T. R. E. val. xvi. pence ; now, xii. XIII. THE LAND OF GISLEBERT DE GAND. M. In Tilchestvne, and Halen, and Stantone Vlf Fenisc had vi. carucates of land and vi. bovates hidable ; and in Braides- tone soke ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for viii. ploughs and vi. oxen. iii. ploughs now in demesne there ; and X. soke-men with ii. carucates of this land, and xviii. villanes and vii. bordars having xii. ploughs. The site of i. mill there ; and Ixx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth ; and under- wood, v. furlongs in length, and ii. in breadth. T. R. E. val. viii. pounds ; now, c. shillings. Malger holds it. Ms. II. In Scipelie Brun and Odincar had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now vii. villanes, and i. soke-man, and i. bordar have v. ploughs there. There iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturgible, vii. furlongs in length, and iii. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. Malger holds it. 62 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. The Jury (the men who were sworn) found that this land did not belong to Vlf Fenisc in the time of King Edward, but that ii. thanes so held it that they were able to give or to sell it to whom they pleased. XIV. THE LAND OF NIGEL DE STATFORD. Fol. 278a, Col. I.] M. In Drachelavve and Hedcote Elric had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for iv. ploughs. Now Nigel de Stadford has in demesne there iv. ploughs, and vi. villanes having iii. ploughs. There is the site of i. mill ; and xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ii. miles and a'^ in length, and ii. miles in breadth. T. R. E. val. Ix. shillings ; now, xl. M. In Stapenhille Godric had vi. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough, i. plough now in demesne there ; and iv. villanes and iii. bordars have i. plough. There iii. acres of meadow. Under-wood i. furlong in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. x. shillings. M. In Sivardingescotes Godric had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough, i. plough now in demesne there ; and iv. villanes and ii. bordars have i. plough, and i. farmer has i. plough. There i. acre of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iv. furlongs in length, and iv. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, xxx. M. In Fornevverche Vlchel had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, i. plough now in demesne there ; and V. villanes and iii. bordars have i. plough. There i. mill worth ii. shillings ; and xxiv. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, J a mile in length, and as much in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xv. shillings. S. In Englebi iii. bovates of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. Soke of the same manor, i. villane and ii. bordars there with I a plough ; and iv. acres of meadow. S. In Tichenhalle i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. The soke belongs to Rapendun the King's Manor. Nigel has i. plough in demesne there, and i. villane and i. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 63 Fol. 278a, Col. I.] bordar with i. plough. There x. acres of meadow. Val. iii. shillings. The I part of the pasturable wood of the same vill, of which the length is i. mile, and the breadth ^ a mile, belongs to Nigel. M. In Smidesbi Eduin had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs, i. plough is now in demesne there, and v. villanes with i. plough. Wood, pasturable, | a mile in length, and vi. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. M. In Ravenestvn Godric had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. It is waste. There viii. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xv. shillings ; now, xii. pence. M. In Dvrandestorp Carle had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ^ a plough. It is waste. T. R. E. val. v. shillings ; now, xii. pence. M. In Achetorp Ernuin had vi. carucates of land hidable. Land for i a plough. It is waste. T. R. E. val. v. shillings ; now, iv. pence. M. In Trangesby Elnod had i a carucate of land hidable. It is waste. T. R. E. val. v. shillings ; now, ii. pence. XV. THE LAND OF ROBERT FITZWILLIAM. M. In Stanlei Vlfar had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Robert the son of William has ii. villanes and ii. bordars with i. plough there. There vi. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and ^ in breadth. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, x. shillings. XVI. THE LAND OF ROGER DE BUSLI. Fol. 278a, Col. II.] M. In Braidestvne Ligulf and Leuuin Cilt had iii. carucates 01 land hidable. Land. Fulk the man of Roger de Busli has V. villanes with ii. ploughs there, and x. acres of meadow. T. R. E. val. xl. shillings ; now, xxi. shillings. This Ligulf had ^ a carucate of the soke which Fulk de Lusoris has taken from Gilbert de Gand. 64 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 278a, Col. II.] M. In Riseleia Vlsi had v. bovates of land and the ^ part of i. bovate hidable ; and Godric v. bovates and the ^ part of i. bovate hidable. Land. Now v. villanes have ii. ploughs there and xx. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ix. fur- longs in length, and iii. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E. val. xxi. shillings and iv. pence ; now, xxii. shillings and viii. pence. Folk holds it of Roger. Ernuin clainas it. M. In Bectvne Swain had vi. bovates and a ^ hidable. There is land for i. plough and a |. Yet iv. ploughs are there, and xi. villanes and ii. bordars. Formerly xx. shillings ; now, xxxii. shillings. Roger holds it, and Leuuine of him. M. In Dore Edwin ii. bovates of land hidable. There is land for J a plough. M. In the same place Leuuin ii. bovates of land hidable. There is land for i. plough. Formerly xx. shillings ; now, Ixiv. pence. Ms. In Nortvn Godeva and Bada had xii. bovates and a J and viii. acres of land. Land for ii. ploughs, iii. villanes have i. plough there. Ingram holds of Roger. Formerly xx. shillings ; now, xviii. pence. M. In Elstretvne Morcar had for a Manor iv. bovates and a | and iv. acres of land hidable. There is land for i. plough. ix. villanes and iii. bordars with ii. ploughs there. There are v. acres of meadow. Formerly xx. shillings ; now, xxx. shillings. Ingram holds of Roger. M. In Rvgetorn Vlsi and Steinulf had i. carucate of land hidable as a Manor, and in Branlege two bovates of land of the soke of Rvgetorn. There is land for ii. ploughs. vi. villanes with i. bordar have i. plough there. In demesne i. plough, and ii. acres and a | of meadow. Formerly xx. shillings ; now, xvi. shillings. XVII. THE LAND OF THE KING'S THANE. Fol. 278*, Col. I.] Ms. II. In Barleie Leuric and Uctred had ii. bovates and a ^ of land hidable. Land for v. oxen. Now iii. villanes and iv. bordars have i. plough there. Wood, pasturable, iii. miles in BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 65 Fol. 278*, Col. I.] length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. vi. shillings and viii. pence. Ms. III. In Chinewoldemaresc Godric, and Edric, and Turgisle had vii. bovates and a ^ of land hidable. Land for i. plough. Now V. villanes have i. plough there. There are vii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iii. miles in length, and v. furlongs and Ixx. perches in breadth. T. R. E. val. xviii. shillings ; now, ix. shillings. M. In Topetvne Dolfin had ii. bovates of land hidable. It is waste. T. R. E. val. viii. shillings ; now, v. shillings. M. In Totingelei Tolf had iv. bovates of land hidable. Land for one plough. It is waste. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and J a mile in breadth. T. R. E. val. x. shillings ; now, xii. pence. M. In Estvne Tolf had v. bovates and a ^ of land hidable. Land for one plough. Now two soke-men, and vi. villanes, and i. bordar having iii. ploughs there. There are ii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, vii. furlongs in length, and iv. furlongs in breadth. T. R E., and now, val. xx. shillings. Leuuin holds of the King. M. In Henleie Godric had vii. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. Now in demesne there i. plough ; and ii. soke-men, and iv. villanes, and ii. bordars, have iii. ploughs and a |. There are ii. acres of meadow. T. R E. val. x. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. Leuuin holds of the King. M. In the same place Rauen had i. bovate of land hidable. It is waste. Sedret holds of the King. M. In Tapetvne Bada had i. bovate of land and iv. acres hidable. Land for ii. oxen. Now iv. villanes have i. plough there, and i. acre of wood in length, and i. acre in breadth. T. R. E. val. X. shillings ; now, ii. shillings and viii. pence. Dolfin holds of the King. Ms. III. In Calehale Sberne and Hacon had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for xii. oxen. Now Steinulf and Dunning have ii. ploughs and a ^ there, and xvii. villanes and i. bordar with ii. ploughs. There are iii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. furlong in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E. val. xxx. shillings ; now, xx. shillings. Dolfin claims it. 66 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Fol. 2782;, Col. I. & II.] M. In Clvne Ernui had vi. bovates of land hidable. Land for i. plough. \ a plough now in demesne there, and viii. villanes with i. plough. T. R. E. val. xx. shillings ; now, viii. shillings. Ernui holds of the King. M. In Lvllitvne Auti had v. carucates of land hidable. Land for V. ploughs. Now Edmund holds there of the King. xxi. villanes, and iii. bordars with iv. ploughs. There is a priest ; and i. mill worth vi. shillings and viii. pence ; and xii. acres of meadow. T. R. E., and now, val. iv. pounds. M. In Ednvnghale ^Igar had ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. Now xii. villanes have viii. ploughs there, and iv. acres of meadow. Underwood, iii. furlongs in length, and i. in breadth. T. R. E., and now, val. xl. shillings. M. In Tilchestvne Osmund Benz had three bovates of land hidable. He himself holds it of the King. M. In the same place Toli had iii. bovates of land hidable. Land for as many oxen. Now ii. villanes have v. oxen in a plough there. There are v. acres of meadow. This land belongs to Sandiacre. Ms. III. In Sandiacre Toli, Cnut, and Gladuin had iv. carucates of land hidable. Land for v. ploughs. Now Toli holds of the King. In demesne there are ii. ploughs ; and x. villanes and vi. bordars having v. ploughs. There is a priest and a church ; and i. mill worth v. shillings and iv. pence ; and XXX. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood. T. R. E., and now, val. xl. shillings. M. In the same place Osmund had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for i. plough. Now it is waste. There are vi. acres of meadow, and a little under-wood. M. In the same place Tochi had ii. bovates of land hidable. M. In Cellesdene Osmund had four bovates of land, and the | part of i. bovate hidable. Land for vi. oxen. He holds it of the King ; and has there iii. villanes with ^ a plough, and ii. acres and a ^ of meadow. Wood, pasturable, iii. furlongs in length, and ii. in breadth. T. R. E. val. x. shillings ; now, v. shillings. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 6-J Fol. 2783, Col. II.] M. In Vlvritvne Alun had i. carucate of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Now Alden holds of the King. There are xii. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, i. mile in length, and \ in breadth. T. R. E. val. x. shillings ; now, ii. shillings. M. In Riselei Lewin had v. bovates of land, and the \ part of i. bovate hidable. His son now holds of the King. There are x. acres of meadow. Wood, pasturable, ix. furlongs in length, and i. furlong and a ^ in breadth. T. R. E. val. x. shillings and viii. pence ; now, v. shillings and iv. pence. M. In Mers Leuenot had iv. bovates of land hidable. Land for iv. oxen. It is waste. M. In Stantvn Edward had i. carucate and a J of land hidable. Land for ii. ploughs. Yet iv. ploughs and a \ are there ; and iv. soke-men, and iv. villanes, and xl. acres of meadow, and a mill worth ii. shillings. Ernui holds. It was worth, and is worth, xx. shillings. In Englebi ii. parts of i. bovate of land. It lies in Stantun. 68 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. IRottinobamebire. {These Entries are taken from the NoitinghUmshire Survey.) In the Borough of Derby, T. R. E., there were residing cc. and xliii. burgesses, and to that borough adjoins xii. carucates of land hidable, which viii. ploughs can plough. This land was divided between xli. burgesses, who had xii. ploughs, ii. parts of the tax and toll forfeitures, and of every custom, are the King's, and a | part the Earl's. In the same borough there was in the King's demesne i. church with vii. clerks who held freely ii. carucates of land in Chester. There was likewise another church of the King's, in which vi. clerks likewise held ix. bovates of land freely in Cornun and Detton. In the town itself there were xiv. mills. Now, there are c. burgesses there, and xl. other lesser ones. c. and iii. houses are waste, which rendered tax. There are now x. mills there, and xvi. acres of meadow. Underwood, iii. furlongs in length and ii. in breadth. T. R. E., it rendered in the whole xxiv. pounds ; now, with the mills and the town of Ludecerce it renders xxx. pounds. M. In Ludecerce the King has ii. carucates of land hidable. Land for iii. ploughs. There is i. soke-man, and ix. villanes having ii. ploughs and xii. acres of meadow. In Derby, the Abbot of Burton has i. mill, and i. masure of land with sac and soc, and ii. masures of which the King has soc, and xiii. acres of meadow. Geoffrey Alselin has i. church, which belonged to Tochi. Ralph Fitzhubert i. church, which belonged to Leuric, with i. carucate of land. Norman de Lincolia i. church, which belonged to Brun. Edric has there i. church which belonged to Coin his father. Earl Hugh has ii. masures and i. fishery with sac and soc. Henry de Ferrers in like manner, iii. masures with sac and soc. Osmer, the priest, has i. bovate of land with sac and soc. Godwin, the priest, in like manner, i. bovate of land. At the feast of Saint Martin the burgesses render to the King xii. thraves of corn, of which the Abbot of Burton has xl. sheaves. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 69 Moreover, in the same borough, there are viii. masures with sac and soc. These belonged to Algar, now they are the King's. The two parts of the King's moneys and the Earl's ^, which and censur issue from Apletree in Derberic Wapentake, are in the hand of the Sheriff, by the testimony of the two shires. Of Stori, the ancestor of Walter de Aincurt, the Jury find, that without the license of any one, he might for himself make there a church on his own land and soke, and assign as much of his tithe as he pleased. In Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire, if the King's peace, given by his hand or seal, should be broken, it is made good by xviii. hundreds. Each hundred viii. pounds. Of this amend the King has ii. parts, the Earl the J. That is to say, xii. hundreds compensate the King, and vi. the Earl. If any one should be outlawed according to law for any offence, no one but the King can restore to him peace. A thane having more than vi. manors does not give relief for his land, except only viii. pounds to the King. If he has only vi. or less, he gives iii. marks of silver to the Sheriff as a relief, wherever he resides, in the borough or without. If a thane having sac and soc should forfeit his land, the King and the Earl have the moiety of his land and chattels between them, and the lawful wife with his lawful heirs, if there are such, have the other moiety. Here are noted those who have soc and sac and thol and thaem, and the King's custom of ii. pence. The Archbishop of York, upon his manors, and Godeva the Countess, upon Newerk Wapentake. And Ulf Fenisc upon his land. The Abbot of Burgh upon Colingeham. The Abbot of Bertune. Earl Hugh upon Marcheton. The Bishop of Chester. Tochi. Suen, the son of Suaue. Siuuard barn. Azor, the son of Saleue. Ulric cilt. Elsi illinge. Leuuin, the son of Aluuin. The Countess ^Elveva. The Countess Goda. Elsi, the son of Cashin upon Werchessope. Henry de Ferrers upon Ednodes- tune and Dubridge and Breilesfordham. Walter de Aincurt upon Granebi and Mortune and Pinnesleig. Of all these no one could have the | penny of the Earl unless by his consent, and that only as long as he lived, except the Archbishop and Ulf Fenisc and the Countess Godeva. Upon the Soke which is at Cliftune, the Earl ought to have the i part of all customs and works. 70 B Xist of tbe flDanors, ^c, of ancient Demesne of tbe Crown (^erra IReais). Aestun 32 Cheseuurde 31 Aidele 31 Chetesuuorde 31 Aisseford 50 Chevenesworde 31 Aivne 31 Chersington - 31 Aneise 30 Chiteslie 28 Badaquella 30 Cliftune 3C Barreuue 29 Codetune 29 Basselau 30 Cotes 27 Begalie 31 Cranchesberie 30 Benedleg 28 Crunforde 27 Berceles 30 Dentine 31 Bereleie - 27 Derelie 26 Blackeuuelle 30 Dranefeld 26 Bredelawe 28 Echintune 26 Bretebi 29 Ednesoure 31 Briminton 26 Eitune 28 Bubenele 30 EUeshope 28 Buitorp 26 Engelbi 30 Bunteshale 27 Esseburne 28 Burtune - 30 Estune 31 Caldecote - 30 Farleie - 27 Caldelawe 31 Flagun - 30 Caloure - 30 Glosop 31 Celardestune - 26 Greherst 26 Ceolhal 31 Hadun - 30 Cestrefeld 26 Haduna 30 Chendre 31 Hadune 30 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Hanzedone - 28 Prestclive Hedfelt - - 31 Ralunt - Hetfeld 31 Rapendune Hetesope 30 Ravensham Hiretune 27 Redlavestune Holun 30 Reuslege Honeston - 26 Scelhaduna Hope - 31 Scetune Ibeholon 27 Serdelaue Langedenedele 31 Smalei Langesdune - 30 Snitertone Lodeuorde 31 Spondune Maneis - 30 Stoche - Mapelton 28 Suerchestune- Maperlie - 32 Tadington Measham 30 Taptune Meslac 27 Teneslege Metesford 27 Tibecel Middletune 27, 29, 32 Tichenhale Milburne 29 Tidesuuelle Muchedesuuelle 31 Toptune Neuubold - 26 Tornesete Neuuetone - 29 Torpe Normantune 26 bis., 29 Transgebi' Nortune 26 Vpetune Ocheaueston 28 Waletune Offretune 31 Welledene Onestune 26 Werchesworde Opetune - 27 Westune Ophidecotes - 28 Wineslie Osmundesthorpe 29 Wingreude Padefeld - 31 Witfeld - Padinc - - 26 Witenton Peverwic 28 Wodnesleie 71 - 30 - 30 29, 30 27 28 30 - 30 - 31 - 22 - 28 27 32 31 29 30 26 27 32 29, 30 31 26 31 - 28 - 30 - 26 27, 28 27 27 28, 32 - 29 - 26 31 26 27 The king's under-tenants at Domesday were very few in number; perhaps they were purposely omitted. William Peverel kept for the king Edensor, Hope, and Mapelton. Coin held Peverewie. Robert, Tibcel. 72 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. Hildebrand, Aeston and Serdelau. In the time of King Edward several of the Royal Princes held part of these demesnes. Earl Algar held Bretibi, Middelton, Neutone, Rapendon, Red- laveston, Waletune, and Westune. Lewin and Edwin (two of the Princes) held Oneston and Normantune ; with Levenet, Leuric held Dentine ; and with Chetel, Langelie and Chatworde ; he also alone held Chesuuorde and Chetesuarde and Padfeld. Hundolf held Waletune. Ligulf, Langedenedele, Tornsete, and Tibcel. Brun, Lodeuuorde. Caschin, Aiune. Eliner, Ceolchal and Hedfelt. Godric, Chendre and Begele. Stapuline, Maperlie. No. II. THE LAND OF THE BISHOP OF CHESTER. The Bishop himself held Salle, Draicot, Aitone, and Bubdene. We do not know the value of the great manor of Salle. Sawley was a hundred in itself; nor is the value of Draicot and Opeuuelle given. Eaton was worth £8 ; Bubdene, £7. His only tenant was Ralf fitz Hubert. For Opeuuelle there is no record of any tenant T. R. E. No doubt these manors were then part of the Bishop's possessions. No. III. THE TENANTS OF THE ABBOT OF BURTON. The Abbot of Burton held the whole of his estate in demesne. He held Ufre, with its berewites ; Parva Ufre, Findre, Potlac and its sokes ; Snellestune, Beruerdescote, Dellingeberie, Hougen, Redesleie, Sudberie, Hiltune and Sudtun, Apelby, Wineshalle, Cotune, Stapenhille, Caldewelle, and Tichenhalle. It was worth altogether ;^22 ; in the time of Edward, £2i3 lOs. Then Earl Algar held two carucates in Cotune ; and Abbot Leuric made over a carucate in Apelby to the Countess Goda ; BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 73 whilst Alfric held Caldewelle, which manor, however, did not belong to the Abbey T. R. E., King William having given it to the Monks for his beneficium. No. IV. THE EARL OF CHESTER Had only a small holding in this County. He had in demesne Merchestone (which had been Earl Siward's, worth only £^) and its berewites of Chenuestun and Macheuorde and Adelardestreu, which Gozelin held of him, and Colle of Gozelin, for los. 8d. yearly. No. V. THE LAND OF ROGER POICTOU. Of the barony of this great personage we know but little. He was evidently out of favour with the king, for he had his estates in his hands, but not, as it would seem, as an escheat ; for here, as in other places, Roger de Poictou is still styled the tenant-in-capite. The manors were Sutton, Bectune, Lunt, Steinesbi, Tunstal, Blanghesbi, Hertstolf, and Winfeld, and Steinulf held the whole of them T. R. E. but the last, which Elnod then held ; and at the date of Domesday Robert (probably de Heriz) held this manor of Earl Alan, who held it under William Peverel. This manor of South Winefeld was the only one held by Earl Alan (Richmond) in this county. No. VL THE TENANTS OF HENRY DE FERRARS. The Earl of Ferrars held in demesne fifty-seven manors : — Winbroc, Eltune, Branzintune, Bradburne, Tizincton, Hortedun, Salham, Pilsburie, Lodouuelle, Etelaue, Ednunghalle, Bolun, Linctune, Wivelslei, Stantune, 2 Heorteshornes, Farulveston, Scrotun, Brocton, 2 Holmtune, 2 Sirelie, Braidelei, Meschetune, Faitune, Stretune, Northberie, Roschinton, Duvelle, Bradelei, Holbroc, Muleford, Machenie, Herdibi, Spondune, Pirelaie, Longesdune, Stantune, Barcouere, Hortel, Giolgrave, Middeltune, Gratune, Wruenele, Muchedesuuelle, Barvve, Sorchestun, Erles- tune, Tuiforde, Steintune, Osmundeston, Codetune, Estun, Radburne, Ednesovre. II 74 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. The order of these manors is that of Domesday. The following are the names of his tenants which are to be found in Domesday, and they, probably, are the very knights, or the ancestors of the 26 knights asserted by William, Earl Ferrars, early in the reign of Henry II., to have been enfeoffeed by Robert de Ferrars, his grandfather, not out of his demesne, but out of that of his father, that is, of Henry de Ferrars of Domesday. (Red Book of the Exchequer.) It must be noted that the attempt to identify them with the families who subsequently held the estates is only tentative. It is made with the full knowledge that great danger of falling into error exists in taking this course, and that very possibly after enquiries will cause an alteration. It is also made with this reserve, that although generally all the manors are grouped under one name, it by no means follows that there were not several persons of the same name, and that is especially probable in the first name which follows ; and it may be the case also, that where the names are separated, the entries properly relate to one person : — 1. Alcher held Estune, Sudberie, and Somersale. These 3 manors were held by the Montgomeries subsequently. 4. Segishale. Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt identifies this place with Sedsall, neither of which places are found in Lysons. 5. Eiton. This manor was held by Tuberville. Wm. fil Alcher and Geoffery his son were knights of the Earl of Derby, tempe Henry II. 2. Alric held Somersale. Probably the same person as Alcher. 3. Alsi held Gheveli. Probably the same person as Elsin No. 8. 4. Amalric held Chelardestun and Normanton. The ancestor probably of the family of the name of Cheladestun, who became extinct about the time of King John. Robert fil Rich de Normanton was a knight of Earl Ferrars, tempe Henry II. 5. Ascelin Goisfred held Turalveston. This was probably the fee which Robert de Chauces held, tempe Henry I. 6. Chetel held Moggington. 7. Cola held Winstune and Geldeslie. Robert, his son, sold them to the Monjoies. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 7^ 8. Elsin held Brailsford, the 2 Bubdens, Osmondestune, Torver- destune, and Geveley. 9. Godric held Sothell and Walestune. The first place is clearly Shottlein Duffield; and Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt identifies Walestune also with a vill in that great manor. 10. Gulbert held Chedelestune. Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt identifies this place with Kedleston, if that be so, this knight was probably the ancestor of the Curzon family. 11. Henry held Burnaleveston and Bereuuerdicote. This knight was probably Henry de Cambrics, who is mentioned in the certificates of said Wm. Ferrars, and who attested his charter to Wm. Pantoul. 1 2. Henry held Morlei. 13. Herbert held Bradestune. Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt identifies this place with Breaston, Earl Roger de Busli's manor, but this appears to be doubtful. 14. Hugh held Toxenai. Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt identifies this place with Trusley, and Lysons would identify his descen- dants with Hugh le Arbalaster of the time of Henry H., but at that time Robert de Trusley was a Knight of this Barony, and in Henry L reign William de Trusley, his father, held his fee. 15. Nigel held Chetune. This was undoubtedly Nigel Albini, who married the daughter of Henry de Ferrars. 16. Orm held Widerdestune, Dulvestune, and Iretune. 17. Radulf Barchetune and Alchementune. This, no doubt, was de Bakepuz. 18. Radulf held Snelleston and Cobelai. This is equally clearly the ancestor of the Montgomery family. 19. Radulf held Benelei. 20. Robert held Eissi, Hiltune, and Turvadestune. This was probably Robert Avenel de Boschville. 21. Robert held Bradeshelle and Merchenestune. This was probably Robert de Dun. 22. Roger held Crocheshale and Stretton. This was probably the ancestor of de Camville, who brought it to Curzon. 23. Roger held Sapertune, Boilston, Merchenestune. jQ BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 24. Suan held Collei. Adam fil Swain held it in the time of Henry II. 25. Saswalo held Hoge, Hatune, and Etewell. His sons Henry and Fulc held 9 manors tempe Henry I., and in the reign of his grandson they were held hy the co-heirs of Henry, yet the Heralds claim these Knights as the ancestors of the noble house of Shirley. 26. Wazelin (Wachiline) held Sutton. 27. William held Sedenefield. Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt identifies this place with Sinfin. If this be so, the probability is that this William is the ancestor of the family of Toke, of whom both William and Humfrey flourished in the reign of Henry II. No. VII. THE TENANTS OF WILLIAM PEVEREL. William Peverel himself held the land of the Forest of Pechefers, which Gernebern and Hundinc held T. R. E. Brade- welle, which Leuing, Sprot, and Owini held; Heselbec and Leitun, which Lewine held ; and Hochelai, Habenai, and Waterfeld, which Ernui, Hundulf, Uluric, Suuan, and Lewine had held, at that period they were waste. Robert (de Heriz .') held Bolsover, which Leuric had held. T. R. E. Silo (de Pleslie .') held Glapwelle, also held by Leuric ; Drogo held Esnotrewic formerly Aldene's ; Edwin held Norman- ton, formerly Elfag's ; and Warner (de Insula?) held Sireland Uftune, Cotenoure, Hainoure, Langeleleie, and Sraithcote, part of which Leuric had held ; and the rest, which 8 Thanes formerly held. No. VIII. THE LAND OF WALTER AINCOURT. Walter de Aincourt kept the whole of his Derbyshire manors in demesne. T. R. E. Swain Cilt the younger had held all but 3 and \ bovates and 4 acres, which Wade held. The names of his 1 1 manors were Mortune, Oughedestune, Winstanestune, Brandune, Wadescel, Pinneslei, Caldecotes, Wilelmstorpe, with Soke in Winefelt and Toptune, Holmesfelt, BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 'j'j Helmetune, and Holtune. They contained together 6 car. 4 bov., \, \, and 12 acres, and were worth by the year £\() 5s. 4d. No. IX. THE LAND OF GOISFRED ASCELIN. Goisfred Ascelin had in his demesne the manors of Aelwoldes- tune, Emboldestune, Torulfdestune and Aleuuoldestune, Ednod- estune and Hoilant, Ochebroke and Breaston, all which Tochi held. T. R. E. Azelinus (Anselin or Lanceline, his chief tenant in Nottingham) held Eghintune, which Tochi also held, and Etewelle, formerly held by Dunstan. It measured 22 carucates and I bovate altogether, besides the waste, of which there was probably much, for its value had been £2<^ T. R. E., now it was only worth £\6 19s. 6d. No. X. THE LAND OF HUBERT FITZ RALE. He held in demesne 12 manors with their berewites — Echinton, Moresburg, Bettune, Ougedeston, Middelton, Heresage with its berewites, Banford, Heret, half Offerton, two parts of Middletune, Hortil, Boletune, Willetune, Langelei, Beledene, and Engelbi, land at Wirksworth, Lede, and Tineslege, part of Crich, Cliptane, Ripley, and Pentrice, Bareuue, and Werradune. 1. Robert (de Meinel T), his chief tenant held for 5 Knights' fees 7 manors in Barlburg, Witeuuelle, Clune, 2 Stratunes, Teges- ton, and Henelege, which Levenet and Lewric, the princes before mentioned, held T. R. E. 2. Goisfred (de Ridel T) held Dachemanestun, which Leuenet held, and which afterwards Geoffry Ridel, the son of Richard Basset, held by inheritance of the old feoffment. 3. Raynouard held Paltreton, Scardecliff, and Tunestal. 4. Ralf (fil Eudo ?) held Newtone and Crich and Scochetorpe. He eventually married the co-heiress of his lord. Leuric and Leuenot held these manors T. R. E. 5. Serlo (de Pleslie?) held Essovre, which the same tenant held T. R. E. 6. Leuinc held Wistanestune, soc to Crich. 7. Nigel held Uffretune with its Berewic in Pentrice. 8. Colle held Boltune. 78 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. No. XI. THE LAND OF RALF DE BURUN. Ralf de Burun had but a small holding in Derbyshire, only between 7 and 8 carucates worth £"] ids., which Ulsi, Turgar, Osmond, and Dunstun had held T. R. E. He held in demesne Horslee, Halun, and Herdibi. Westune was held of him by Gulbert, and a knight unnamed held Denebi. No. Xn. THE LAND OF ASCUIT MUSARD. He also had only a small Barony in this county, of which Staveley was the head, the whole of which he held in demesne. It consisted besides of Barleie, Holun, Wadecel, and Brantune, and part of Chinewolde Marsh. His holding was nearly similar in size and value to that of Ralf de Burun. Hacon, Dunninc Bramuine, and Aluuold were the tenants T. R. E. No. XIII. THE LAND OF GILBERT DE GAND. Ilkeston, Halun, Stanton and Shipley comprised this small Barony, and the whole of it was held under the Earl by Malger (no doubt his steward of Rolleston), and the ancestor of that family. Ulf Fenisc, Brun, and Odincar held it T. R. E. No. XIV. THE LAND OF NIGEL DE STAFFORD. This Baron had no under-tenants. He kept the whole of the manors in demesne. It contained altogether 14 carucates and 3 bovates, and was then worth £6 14s. 6d. Some of the manors were valued at a nominal rate — one at 4d., another 2d., — so that they were probably greatly wasted. The names of his manors were Drackelowe, the head of the Barony, Hethcote, Stapenhill, Suardingecotes, Fornewerche, Engelbi, Tichenhalle, Smidesbi, Ravenestun, Durandstorp, Achetorp, Trangesby, and the tenants T. R. E. were Godric, Elric, Ulchel, Eduin, Ernuin, and Elnod. No. XV. THE LAND OF ROBERT FITZ WILLIAM Consisted only of the manor of Stanley, which Ursar held T. R. E., of the value of only los. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. No. XVI. THE LAND OF ROGER DE BUSLI. 79 This great Nottingham and Yorkshire Baron had only one manor, Rvgetorn, in demesne in this county. His chief tenant, Ingram, held Norton and Elstretvne, which formerly Morcar's (the Earl) Godeva (the Countess) and Bada held. Leuuine held Bretune and Dore, which Swain (of Colley ?) and Eduuin formerly held ; and Fulco held Braidestune and Riseleia, formerly held by Leuuine, Ligulf, and Godric. ^bc Mng's ^banes. The King's Thanes were few in number, only 19, and some of them did not hold the estates they formerly possessed. The manors they held' were neither important nor numerous, but several of them will be found holding manors under Norman Lords, with many others of their nation. 1. Alden held Ulwritune, which Alun formerly held. 2. Algar held Ednunghall. 3. Dolfin held Topton and Taptune, which Bada formerly held. 3. Edmund held Wllitune, formerly Auti's. 4. Ernuin held Clune T. R. E. and now, and Stanton, which Edward formerly held, 5. 6, 7. Godrich, Edric, and Turgisle held Chinewaldemersh. 8. Leuuine held Estune, formerly Tolf's and Stanley formerly God rice's. 9. Leuuine, the son of, held Risley, which his father held T. R. E. 10. Levenot held Mers, which was then waste. 11, 12. Leuric and Uctred held Barleie. 13. Osmund Benz T. R. E., and then held Tichelston and part of Sandiacre and Cellesden. 14. Toli held part of the two former places, which Canute and Gladwin formerly held. 15. Tochi had part of Sandiacre. 16. Raven held part of Henleie. 17. 18. Stinnulf and Dunning held Calehale, which formerly Sberne and Hacon held, and which Dolphin then claimed. 19. Tolf held Totingleie. 8o a %\3t of tbe fIDanors mentioneb in tbe Berbi?* 0bire 2)omesba^, witb some fiDobern IRamee. ( The Initials show the Lords of the several Manors. ) Abbreviations. — Abb. B. = Abbot of Burton, 33 ; A. M. = Asculf Musard, 61 ; B. = Radulf de Buron, 59 ; D. = Walt Deincourt, 53 ; E. H. = Earl Hugh, 35 ; Epis C = Epis Chestre, 33 ; F. = Ferrars, 36 ; G. Ans. = Geoffry Anselin, 54 ; G. G. = Gilbert de Gant, 61 ; K. = the King, 25-64; N. S. = Nigel de Stafford, 62 ; P. = Wm. Peverel, 51 ; R. P. = Roger Poictou, 35 ; R. B. = Roger de Busli, 63 ; R. fitz H. = Ralf fitz Hubert, 55 ; R. fitz W. = Robert fitz William, 63. N S. Achetorp, 63. R. fitz H. Barleburg, 56. E. H. Adelardestrew (Alles- K.&A.M Barleie, 60, 64, 65. tree), 35. R. fitz H. Bareuue, 59. K. Aestun (Aston - on - K. & F. Barreuue (Barrow), 29, Trent), 32. 47- G. Ans. Aeluuoldestun ( Alvas • F. Barctune (Barton), 41. ton), 54. K. Basselau, 30. K. Aidele (Edale), 31. Bectune, see Bettime. K. Aisseford ( Ashford), 30. K. Begelie (Beeley), 31. Epis C. Aitone, 33. R. fitz H. Belidene (Ballidon),S9. F. Aitune, 43. P. Belesovre, 51. K. Aivne, 31. Abb. of B. Beruerdescote, 33. F. Alchementune (Alk- K. Benedlege(Bentley),28. manton), 41. F. Beneleie (Bentley), 41. P. Aldene. K. Berceles, 30. K. Aneis, 30. R.P.,R.fitz Bettune, 35, 56, 64. Abb. B. Appleby, 34. H.,&R.B. K. Blackeuuelle, 30. K. Badequella (Bakewell), R. P. Blangesbi, 36. 30- K. Bobeneule(Bubnel), 30 R. fitz H. Banford (Bamford) 58. F. Boilstune, 44. F. Barcouere, 47. R. fitz H. Boletune (Boulton), 58 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 8l F. F. F. F., & G. Ans.,&B. F. F. P. D. R. B. A. M. F. K. K. K. F. F. Epis C. K. K. F. K. K. D. Abb. B. K. K. K. F. K. Bolun, 39. Bradebum, 37. Braedeshaile, 47. Braidestune, 46,55,63 Braedelai (Bradley), 42, 46. Brailesford, 42, 69. Bradewelle (Bradwell), 52. Brandune, 53. Branlege (Bramley Lane), 64. Brantune (Brampton), 60. Brazington (Brassing- ton), 37. Bretebi, 29. Bredelauue (Broadlaw), 28. Briminton, 26. Broctune, 41. Bubdene (Bubden in Longford), 44, 45- Bubdene, 33. Bubinelli, 30. Buitorp (Boythorpe), 26, 28. Bunteshale (Bonsall), 27. Bvrnvlfestone, 50. Burtune, 30. Caldecote, 30. Caldecotes, 53. Caldewell, 34. Caldelauue, 27. Calehale, 66. Caluoure (Calver), 30. Cedesdene (Chaddes- den), 47. Cellesdene, 66. F. & K. Celardestune (Chellas- ton), 29, 49. K. Cestrefield, 26. K. Ceolhal (Chunal), 31. K. Chendre (Kinder), 31. E. H. Cheneiuton(Knivetoii), 35- F. Chetune (Catton), 38. K. Cheuenesuurde, 31. K. Chersintune (Carsing- ton), 27. K. Chetesuorde (Chats- wood), 31. F. Chetelestune (Kedel- ston), 47. K. &.R. P. 1 Chinewoldesraaresc A. M. I (Killamarsh), 61,65. K. Chiseuurde (Chis- worth), 31. K. Chiteslei, 28. K. Cliftune, 30, 69. RalffitzH. Cliptune, 59. \&g;fi'^)ciune,56,66. F. Cobelei (Cubley) 44. K. & F. Coditune, 29, 49. Colingeham,69. F. CoUei, 36. P. Cotenoure(Codnor),52. Coruun. K. Cotes, 27. Abb. B. Cotune, 29, 34. K. Cranchesberie, 30. R. fitz H. Crice (Crich), 57. F. Crocheshalle (Crox- hall), 38. K. Crunford (Cromford), 27. Abb. B. Dellingeberie bury), 33, Delebi, 50. (Dal- 12 82 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. B. Denebi, 60. K. Dentine (Dinting), 31. K. Derbi, 68. K. Dereleie (Darley), 27, 28. D. Detton. R. B. Dore, 64. R. fitz H. Dochemanestune, 56. N. S. Drachelavve, 62. EpisC. Draicote, 33. K. Dranefeld, 26. F. Dulvestune, 45. N. S. Dvrandestorp, 63. K. & F. Dobridge (Doveridge), 39. 69. F. Dovelle (Duffield), 46. K. Echintune, 26. R. fitz H. Echintune, 55. K. & F. Ednesoure, 31, 51. E. H. & F. Ednodestune (Ednas- ton, 35, 55, 69. F. & K. Ednunghalle (Eding- hal), 38, 66. G. Ans. Eghintune (Eggington), 55- F. Eisse(Ash), 41. K. Eitune (Cold Eaton), 28. K. Elleshope (Alsop), 28. R. B. Elstretune, 64. F. Eitune (Elton), 37. G. Ans. Emboldestune (Ambas- ton), 54. F., K., R.| fitz. H., [Engelbi, 30, 59, 62. & N. S.) F. Erleston (Afleston),49. P. Esnoteric, 52. K. Esseburne (Ashbourn), 28 bis. R. fitz H. Essovre (Ashover), 56. K. & F. Estune (Aston), 31 bis, 40, 5°. 65- F. Etelavve (Atlowe), 38. F. & G. Etewelle (Atwell), 51, ." 54- Ans. F. Faitvne, 44. K. Farleie, 27. F. Farvlveston, 40. Abb B. Findre, 33. K. Flagun (Flagg), 30. N. S. Forneuverche, 62. F. Gelderlei (Yeldesley), 43- Ghersintune. F. Ghevele (Yeaveley), 45 F. Gilgraie (Yolgrave), 48, 67. P. Glappevelle, 51. K. Glosop,3i. D. Granibi, 69. F. Gratune, 47. K. Greherst, 26. P. Habenai, 53. R. Hadun, 30. K. Haduna (Over H ad- don), 30. K. Hadune, 30. P. Hainour (Heanor), 52. B. Halun (Halam), 60. G. G. Halen, 61. K. Hanzedone (Hanson), 28. Hatun (Hatton), 43. F. N. S. Hedcote(Hethcote),62. K. Hedfelt (Hadfield), 31. D. Helmetune (Elmton), 53- R. fitz H. Henlege (Hanley), 56. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. 83 K. Henleie (in Wingfield), 6S- F. Hennesoure, 51. R. P. Hertestaft (Hertstaft), 36. R. fitz H. Heret, 58. F. (2) Heoteshorne (Harts- horn), 39. B. Herdibi, 60. R. fitz H. Hereseige (Hather- sage), 58. P. Heselbec, 53. K. Hetesope (Hassop), 30. K. Hetfelt, 31. Abb.B.&F . Hiltune, 34, 42. K. Hiretune (Ireton), 27. P. Hochelai (Hucklow), 53- F. Hoge, 43. G. Ans. Hoilant (Hulland), 55. F. Holebroc, 46. F. & G. Holintune (Holling- ton), 42, 55. Ans. D. Holmsfelt, 53. A. M. Holon, 60. D. Holtun, 41. K. Holun, 54. K. Hope, 31, 30- K. Honestune (Unston). B. Horslei, 60. F. Horteden, 37. R. fitz H. Hortel, 58. Horeeton. Abb. B. Hougen, 33. K. Hope, 31. K. Ibeholon (Ible), 27. F. Iretune, 50. K. Langedenedale (Lon- dendale), 31. R. fitz H. Langelei, 58. K. Langeleie, ^i. P. Langeleie, 52. K. & F. Langesdune (Longs- don), 30, 46. R. fitz H. Lede, 57. P. Leitun (Litton), 53. F. Linctune (Linton), 39. K. Lodeuuorde (Lud- worth), 31. F. I^odouuelle (Lud- worth), 37. K. Ludecerce (Litchurch), 68. K. Lulletune (Lullington), 66. R. P. Lvnt (Heath), 35. F. Machenie (Makeney), 46. E. H. Macheworde, 35. K. Maneis, 30. K. Maperlie, 32. K. Mapeltune, 28. K. & E. H. Marchetone (Marching- ton), 35, 65. F. Merchetune (Mark- eaton), 43. F. Mercheuestune (Mer- caston), 50. F. Merstun, 39. K. Mers, 67. K. Meslac, 27. K. Mestesforde, 27, 28. K. Messeham, 30. K. Mileborne, 29. K. Middletune (Wirks- worth), 27, 29, 32. F. Middletune, 47. R. fitz H. Middletune (in Yol- greave), 58. F. Mogintune, 50. F. Morelie, 47, 51. 84 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. R. fitz H. Moresburg (Mosbro), 56. D. Mortune, 53, 69. Moruine (Morwine). K. & F. Muchedesuuelle,3i, 48. F. Muleford, 46. K. F. K. F., & R. fitz H P. K. F. F. K. R. B. Neuuebold (Newbold), 26. Neutone, 37. [Nevtune, 29, 37, 57. Normentune, 52. Normantune, 26 bis, 29. Normantune, 49. Nortberie, 45. Nortune, 26. Nortune, 64. G. Ans. Ochebroc, 55. K. Ochenauestun (Hog- naston), 28. R. fitz H.,1 „„ ^ o & K. [Offretune, 31, 58. K. Onestune (Unstone), 26. K. Opetune (Hopton), 27. Epis. C. Opeuuelle (Hopwell), 23- K. Ophidecotes (Offcote), 28. F. Oswardestune (Osles- ton), 46. K. Osmundestune (Os- maston), 29. F. Osmvndestune, 45, 49 bis. D. Ougedestun (Ogston), Si- 's., fitz H. Oughedestane, 58. F. Ouere (Over). K. Padefeld, 31. K. Padinc, 26. R. fitz H. Paltretune, 56. Abb. B. Parva Vfre (Littleover), 33- P. Pechefers (Peak Forest), 52. R. fitz H. Pentric, 59. K. Peverwic (Parwich), 28 bis. F. Pilesberie, 37. D. K. Pinneslei, 53, 69. F. Pirelaie, 47. Abb. B. Potlac, 33. K. Prestclive (Priestcliff), 3°- F. Radburne, 51. K. Ralunt (Rowland), 30. K. Ranesha, 26. K.,Abb. B., ) Rapendune (Repton), & N. S. ) 29, 30, 62. N. S. Ravenestune, 63. Abb. B. &lRedesleie (Rodsley), F- > 34, 45- K. Redlaveston, 28. K. Reuslege (Rowsley), 3°- R. fil H. Ripelie, 59. K. & R. B. Riseleia, 64, 67. F. Roschintune (Roston), 45- F. Rouecestre, 44. R. B. Rogetorn(Rowthorne), 64. F. Salham (Saulm), 37. Epis. C. Salle (Sawley), 33. K. Sandiacre, 67. F Sapertune, 40. R. fitz VV. Scardecliff, 56. Scaruesdale. Scetune (Shatton), 31. Scelhadun (Sheldon), 3°- Scipelie (Shipley), 61. Scochtorp, 57. Scrotun, 40 bis. Sedenefeld, 49. Segersale, 43. Serdelau (Shardlow), 32- Sinetretone (Snitter- ton), 27. Sereleie (Shirley), 42. Sirelunt (Shirland), 52. Sivardingscote, 62. Smalei, 28. Smidesbi, 63. Smitecote, 52. Snellestune, 33, 44. Sothelle (Shottle), 38. Spondune, 32, 46. Stanlei, 63, Stantune, 39, 47, 68. Stantone (by Dale), 61. Abb^B^ ^jStapenhille,34, 62. A. M. Stavelie, 60. R. P. Steinesbi, 36. F. Stenitune, 49. F. Stertune (Sturston), 44. K. Stoche (Stoke), 31. F. & R. fiUStreitune (Stretton), H. ) 38, 56. R. fitz H. Stratune, 56. Abb^B.,&|s^dberie,36,4o. R. P. Sudtune (in the Dale), 34, 35- Abb. B. &1 Sudtune (on the Hill), F. ) 42- F. (2) Summersales, 41. BOOK OF DOMESDAY. K &F. K. K. G. G. R. fitz H. F. F. F. K. K. F. P. N. S. K. N. S. P. Abb. B. & F. F. K. &F. R. fitz W. K. F. G. G. 85 Suerchestune (Swarkes- ton), 29, 47. K. Tadintune, 30. K. Tapetune, 26, 66. K., R. fitz)Teneslege (Tansley), H. J 27, 57. R. fitz H. Tegeston, 56. K. Tibecel, 32. K., Abb.ofj Tichenhalle, 29, 30, B., &N.S.) 34,62. K. Tidesuuelle, 31. G. G. Tilchestune, 61, 66. F. Tizinctun, 37. K. Toptune, 26, 65. K. Tornesete (Thornsett), 31- K Torp, 27. K. Totingelei, 65. F. Toxenai, 41. R. P., & l-punestalle, 36, 56. K.,&N. S. Tranbesbi, 30, 63. I. P., & R. fitz H. F. Tviforde, 49. ■ R. fil H. Vfifentune (Ufton), 58. Abb. B. Vfre, 33. P. Vftone, 52. K. Vpetun (Upton), 26. K. Vlvritune, 67. D.&A. M. Wadescil, 53, 61. F. K. F. P. K. K. B. Walecross, 38. Waletune, 27, 28. Walestune (in Duffield), 38- Watrefeld, 53. Welledene, 27. Wodnesley (Wendes- ley), 26. Wersedune. Werchesoppa, 69. 86 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. K., & R. 1 Werchesuuorde, 27, fitz H. ) 28, 57. K., & G. 1 westune, 28, 32. B. Westone (on Trent),S9. F. Widerdestune, 45. D. Wilelmestorp, 53. R. fitz H. Willetune (Willington), 58. F. Winbroc, 36. K. Wineslei, 29, 39. R. P. Winfeld, 36. K. Wingreude, 26. Abb. B. Wineshalle, 34. F. Winsterne (Winster), 36. D. & R ) Wistanestune (Wessing- ton), S3, 57- fitzH. K. Witfeld, 31. K. Wilintune, 26. R. fitz H. Wituuelle (Whitwell), 56. R. F. Wivleslei (Willesley), 29. 39-, K. Wodneslei, 27. F. Wrueuele, 48. Note. — The modem names of many of these manors are offered, but with great hesitation. For some of them proofs will be given hereafter in the Parochial History ; for others, the author relies upon the writings of Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt, Lysons, Eyton, and Wolley, and other Derbyshire historians ; especially the first-mentioned, whose valuable work upon Domesday has been frequently referred to with advantage. The fear, however, is entertained that far too many of the derivations here given are mere guesses, and, as such, liable to error. County Historians, as a rule, are too anxious to identify places, and too ready to adopt any similarity in sound as proof of identity in name. But it should be remembered that many Domesday manors were waste even at that time, . and that many more must have become so since ; and the very site of some of such places is lost, and that, on the other hand, manors were frequently created down to the date of the statute which prohibi- ted subinfeudation, and, also, that often old names (those of their lords) were given to them. And, above all, it must be borne in mind that nearly half the names of the present places in Derbyshire are not mentioned in Domesday — some of them now, and perhaps then, large towns, such as Belper, Matlock, Borrowash, Butterley, Chapel-en-le -Frith, Clay Cross, Pleasley, and scores of others, many of which, no doubt, existed, at any rate as villa, before Domesday, but were not visited by the Commissioners, because it was known that they paid no hide. It is considered certain that the Commissioners had written BOOK OF DOMESDAY. §7 instructions to guide them. It is difficult to believe that Chesterfield is identical with the small place mentioned in Domesday, a mere Berewic of Newbold ; or that Alfreton is to be found under the name of Elstreton. Both were probably important stations even at that date, but for some cause perhaps they were the head-quarters of different members of the royal family, or of some court favourite— they were especially exempted. With regard to Alfreton, it is tolerably clear that Roger de Busli succeeded here, as well as elsewhere, to the possessions of Earl Morcar and the Countess Godiva, who held Alfreton and Norton ; and these two small places comprised the Barony of Ingelram, whose son Ranulf was Sheriff of Notting- ham and Derby. Yet Elstreton, of Domesday, was assessed at 30s. (it had previously been 20s.), and Norton at is. 6d. Is it possible that so small a holding could have formed the barony of so important a person as Ranulf fil Ingleram ? Again, Peak Castle is not assessed at all, although the land, about it, is assessed at 40s. ; and a castle at Bolsover is not even mentioned. But it is clear from the geographical position of both places (as from the actual mention of Peak), that both were great strongholds at this period, and long previously. These facts should prevent a too rash acceptance of an identity. Besides, it must be recollected that frequently the same names were given to more than one place, especially to newly-created manors, and that we have now perhaps only knowledge of one of them. A curious instance of the danger of rashly accepting a possible identity exists in the case of Abney. Every Derbyshire historian without exception identifies it with Henry Fen-ars' wasted manor of Habenai, which, with other places, was wasted (probably purposely) for the chase. But actual proof exists in numerous charters, of the Abney family, that their name, and the name of the manor, was Albini, a family who had but little connection with the County at this early period, and whose name has no affinity with Habenai. With reference to Chesterfield, it is quite clear that there were two places of this name in Derbyshire. Of this we have actual proof in that most valuable record, " The Testa de Nevil." But the lesser Chesterfield is lost. The Testa records " That there was one carucate in Chesterfield in Wingerworth, 88 BOOK OF DOMESDAY. anciently of the soke of Chesterfield," and it was given to the ancestor of Wachiline de Ferrars by King William the Bastard. Now, it might have been contended that Chesterfield was a berewite of Wingerworth before it became a berewite of Newbold. But that is impossible in face of the finding of the jury that formerly the Chesterfield in Wingerworth was of the soke of Chesterfield : that is, that the smaller Chesterfield was a member of the latter. It is a curious fact that Wingerworth itself, at Domesday, was not recorded as a member of Chesterfield, as it is now esteemed ; that record states that it had a soke of its own. In later times it is treated as a chapelry of Chesterfield, and ecclesiastical reasons may account for this fact. Again, Chesterfield had a church, for William Rufus gave it to Lincoln. Very possibly the bishop had the town as well. It is im- probable that a mere berewite to Newbold would have one. Wm. Rufus gave the church of Chesterfield, with those of Mansfield, and two other manors ; and he actually includes the lands and chapels which belonged to each of those four manors (calling them manors in the document). It is clear that the second Chesterfield, which was then soke to the greater, was not the berewite of Newbold, or it would have been described as of the soke of that place ; and it is clear, also, that Chesterfield at the time of Domesday was an important place, holding eccle- siastical sway over many surrounding places, including Newbold itself, just as it does at the present day. So, too, with regard to Eckington, it is hardly likely that this important manor, the head of Ralf fitz Hubert's barony, which Domes- day records contained four carucates, and had been worth £'], was identical with the berewite of that name in Newbold. Newbold, with seven berewites, including Chesterfield, had only seven carucates, and had been worth only £6, although then the relative values had altered. Besides, the fact that Eckington was recorded separately as a manor, is sufficient to show it is a different place altogether from the Newbold berewite. If that were situated in Eckington Manor, it would have been described, not as a berewite, but as a soke of Newbold in Eckington. This second Eckington may be found somewhere else. The learned reader must therefore accept these possible derivations as intended generally to identify the name and not the place. 89 EXTRACTS (WITH NOTES) FROM THE PIPE ROLLS FOR THE COUNTIES OF IRottingbam anb ^ctb^, FROM THE EARLIEST PERIOD TO THE END OF THE REIGN OF KING EDWARD I. CHAPTER II. After Domesday, the most valuable series of documents relating to county history is the Pipe Rolls, and the Rolls for the County of Derby are, generally, in no way inferior to those of other counties. They are mixed up so inextricably with those portions relating to the County of Nottingham that no attempt can be made to separate them ; their value is immense, yet hitherto no use has been made of them in developing the history of this county. Lysons has extracted largely from many series of Public Records, but, like others, he has neglected these sources, and yet they are the very buttresses of manorial and genealogical history. The meaning of the term Pipe Roll is involved in obscurity ; and the several suggestions which have been made are generally obscure, and sometimes even ridiculous. It may be hazarded, that it is a contraction of the word pipulum— a scolding, a railing, or, as is commonly said, a rating. The accounts of the nation are here rated, arranged, controlled, and these Rolls are strictly applied to this purpose. 13 90 THE PIPE ROLLS. They contain the national accounts, in fact the annual Budget ; the Sheriffs of each county, and those great lords who had baili- wicks of their own (quasi regal control over their tenants), here account to the Exchequer for all aid, taxes, scutages, reliefs, fee farm rents, fines, and amercements ; and those who are entitled to them here claiming their exemptions, or their charges for work performed for the county or for the King or Kingdom ; we occasionally get items of royal expenditure, and frequently scraps of family history, which are procurable from no other source. One of the most important series of items consists of the returns made by the Sheriffs upon the assessment of juries, with the aid of the Knights of the County and the Justices Itinerant, of the amounts payable for scutage. For many years there appears to have been no change in the mode of assessment, and the record was made up from the valuation of Domesday ; at all events we have no information respecting any. The first occasion where a detailed account of the scutage is given is upon the marriage of the King's eldest daughter, which was made about the 15th year of Henry II. This has given rise to the mistake, which is almost universal among genealogists, that it is the date of the certificates of Knights of the Red Book ; but these certificates were given periodically, and some of those con- tained in the Red Book are as late as the time of Richard I., or, possibly, of King John ; indeed they only end when the scutages and Knights' certificates of the so-called Testa de Nevil begin. The line cannot be drawn very sharply between these books ; but it may be said generally of the Red Book that it contains abstracts of all the returns prior to the great fiscal changes of Archbishop Hubert Walter of 1 198, and that the Testa de Nevil contains all those from that period down to the 31st Edward I., when the Book of Aids commences. There is no evidence of any change in the Scutage Rolls (omitting a remarkable collection of Forest amercements in the 22nd year of this King), until the 33rd, when we do not have particulars of a general scutage, but only of the Knights' fees of those who did not go with the King's army into Gascony. From this it has been contended, even by Madox, that a scutage was only payable by those who did not go out with the army ; but the fact that those who did not pay were excused, and some- THE PIPE ROLLS. 91 times because they were with the army, shows that the excuse was an exception ; besides there was no compensating service on the occasion of a knighthood or a wedding. No account is given in the reign of Henry II. of the aid for Knighting the King's elder sons, or of the ordinary collection. In King Richard's reign we have 3 scutages extraordinary, the first of which only was regular, that of the redemption of the King in the 6th year of his reign. He had no eldest son to knight or daughter to marry, but acting upon this precedent, he appears to have levied two additional ones, and, not content with this, he, by the aid of Archbishop Hubert, inaugurated an entirely new system of taxation, designed to get rid of the abuses which had crept in, and by which the Crown was practi- cally defrauded of its rights. Instances of the amount of these deductions may be found at pages 20 and 21 of the Introduction to Domesday. King John, of course, followed his brother's example, and harassed his subjects with repeated impositions, until Magna Charta compelled him to refrain from doing so, except in the three cases before-mentioned, which the ancient English law prior to the Conquest allowed as the three necessities of the Crown. There can be but little doubt that inquisitions were made only at long intervals, and that the same return was utilised for the purpose of several scutages. This is clear, from the fact that in the scutages so made the names of Knights who were dead are frequently retained for many years, to the great confusion of the genealogists, who have too frequently relied upon the fact that the name is to be found in a particular Roll, and therefore assumed that the person was living at the period. If a fresh name occurs, that is proof of a change of tenants and of the existence of the person named at that period, but in the other case it may be only proof that the scutage lists have not been reformed. The whole of these Rolls, with the exception of the first, are properly dated, and this constitutes their chief value. They form the back-bone of history — a correct chronology. The first alone is in doubt, and, seeing that it is imperfect, and probably made up of various fragments, it can only positively be asserted of it that it is about the date of the end of the reign of Henry I., or the 92 THE PIPE ROLLS. beginning of that of King Stephen, i.e., from the year 1131 to II3S- These Rolls, fortunately, contain a great variety of entries, the dates of which may be absolutely relied upon ; of such are the grants by the Crown to particular persons, the payment of reliefs, the amercements for offences, the payment of fees and fines for especial purposes. And these entries are of the greatest value to the historian. Owing to the fact that Charters were generally undated prior to the reign of King Edward II., and that they can only be dated by means of the era of the several witnesses, the greatest confusion is made by the best-intentioned genealo- gists ; but with the aid of the Pipe Rolls the history of almost every witness of note may be ascertained, and an approximate date obtained for the Charter, the date of which is in issue. After that period Charters are generally dated, and the impor- tance of having a full abstract of these Rolls ceases. For this reason alone these Rolls are worth abstracting ; since they will aid every genealogist treating of Derbyshire History, and in aid of the composition of this book they are invaluable, for they test with unerring accuracy the forgeries and blundering pedigrees which have so long been foisted upon the county. Of course these pages will not supply all the information, or even all the names recorded ; and it should be stated that they were not extracted with a view to publication — the author only made them for his own work, but finding them of such great value, and being pressed to print them, he has done so. It will be found that they give a tolerable abstract, and afford to those desiring to pursue the enquiry an opportunity of doing so with the least amount of trouble. A great number of these entries appear year after year in the Rolls. Generally only one entry is given, for, as a rule, the repetition simply means that the amercement or scutage was not paid, and therefore it was carried over to the next account. The person obliged to pay possibly was dead or banished an outlaw, and, perhaps, he never paid. The first charge is always adopted if possible, and generally it is the only one given. It must not be taken, therefore, that the same name is not repeated in the Rolls, or that other names are not to be found. To give more than an abstract of these Rolls would occupy too much space. It may be noted, for the convenience of genealogists, that M.-Gen. the THE PIPE ROLLS. 93 Honourable G. Wrottesley has done this work for the County of Stafford (pubhshed by the WiUiam Salt Society). It was his excellent example which chiefly induced the author to give this abstract ; and it is to be hoped that other workers may be found to publish accounts for other counties. These publications are of value for all counties alike. General Wrottesley's work is of the greatest value in aid of Derbyshire history, and it is to be hoped that this account will be equally valuable for other counties. It will be noticed that in transcribing the names the author has not pursued an uniform course. In a work like that of the Pipe Roll Society it is essential to give a photograph, so to speak, of the original ; but in one of this nature it would only create unnecessary difficulty to record every error in spelling which the scribes of these Rolls have fallen into, for these variations are merely errors, and are of no value in the sense of well-known names, although it may be important to preserve them in those less known. In the latter case, therefore, the name is given as it is written ; but in such well-known names as Ferrars, Beauchamp, Belvoir, etc., one uniform mode is given, whether it is to be found in the Roll itself; and when only the name is given, it may be assumed that the context is of no value in the history of the individual. Again, no attempt in the case of names but little known is made to complete them, and the letters of the original are set out as accurately as possible, leaving it to the learned reader to extend them for himself, and. to determine their identity with other forms of the same name. 94 ^be 3first (Breat IRoU of the pipe (mo. 1). ("3I-S-) OSBERT Sylvan was Sheriff this year, and he rendered an account of ^^68 los. 5d. blanc, and of ii'23 i8s. 5d. tale for the old farm. In the Treasury, £6^ los. 5d. bl., and £2^ i8s. 5d. tale, and for the new farm for the half-year in the Treasury, .^10 7s. 2d. He also paid 7 marcs that he might hold in capite one fee, which was William fil Gaufry's. He accounted for Danegelt ;^78 13s. gd. £2^ 13s. id. was excused, and he held £^ 2s. 8d. in hand. He' also accounted for the Burgess Aid, ;^I3 5s. Note. — He was probably a grandson of Joceus le Fleming, who accompanied the Conqueror to England, and obtained the Lordship of Cuckney, in Notts. Some of his descendants settled at Thorpe, in Yorkshire. I. — Alan, Jordan fitz, paid lOOs. for the farm of Clipston for the past year. (This was in Nottinghamshire, part of the escheated fee of the great Roger de Busli. This baron was Lord of Tuxford, and he held part of the fee of Roger de Busli.) He also owed one Dextria (war horse) worth ^20 Rennes, for which John de Maries was pledge, and he was excused the payment of 12s. Danegeld. 2. — Busli Jordan accounted for £4. concerning the plea of Ralf Bass. (This was probably a relation, if not the same person.) 3. — Bass, Ralf and Rich, besides the plea just mentioned. Swen de Porter owed lOOs., on his suit. Richard Bass paid £7 19s., and was excused the payment in THE PIPE ROLLS. 95 the Mansfield district of 5s. 4d., and of the sum of ^i 9s. los. Danegelt. Note. — This name Bass is used as an abbreviation of Baos or Bayeaux, as well as sometimes of a different name — Basset — both of which families settled in the county. The former is the same name as that borne by the present family of Burton- upon-Trent. 4. — Barrett or Barre, Ralf, accounted for £\2 9s. 4d. for part of the old farm of Odo fitz Ralf. Note. — It is not very clear what was meant by the expression, " the old farm." Sometimes it means (in the Pipe Rolls), arrears or accounts of old standing ; but here probably it is used as an equivalent of the words, " old feoffment." That phrase, as we use it, means a feoffment made in the reign of Henry I., though perhaps it is sometimes used in the sense of a grant made to an ancestor. At any rate, the Editors of the Pipe Roll Society so use it. But although the Statutes of Limitations and their relation to legal memory shifted almost with every reign, there has been no " old feoffment " since the death of Henry I. If this is the meaning here, it would seem to show that this portion of the Roll was of the reign of King Stephen. But that can scarcely be insisted upon, and it most probably referred to a grant prior to the commencement of the reign of Henry I., or to one made upon the death of Hubert (or Odo) fitz Ralf. This family held Teversholt, of the fee of Hubert fitz Ralf, from this early period until the reign of Henry VI., when an heiress carried it to the Greenhows, and ultimately to the ancient family of Molineux. William de Gresley made a con- vention concerning land with Rad Barre at this period. 5. — Baldricus was excused payment of 4s. in Mansfield. 6. — Bassett, Richard, was excused payment of 7s. 8d., probably in Scarclive. Possibly he was the same person as Richard Bass. 7. — Belfago, Ralf, was excused los. Danegelt. 8. — Bisset, William, was excused los. Danegelt. 9. — Bilburc, Herbert, was excused his payment to Danegelt. Note. — This name is written Bireburg, but no doubt it was that Herbert of Bilburgh who gave lands to Peverel's foundation of Lenton in 1102, and whose daughters and co-heirs were respec- tively, Emma, who had Gunolveston and Kilomersh, in Derby- shire ; and Ivicia, who had Molinton, in Northamptonshire, and 96 THE PIPE ROLLS. Bilburg. Emma married Ivo, son of Robert de Heris, whose posterity long were lords of South Wingfield, Tibshelf, Gonolds- ton, and Widmerpol, and other places in Derbyshire. Ivicia married one Aman, of Nottingham. This family is of very great interest to Derbyshire history, especially with regard to the Manor of Bilburg, which was the subject of a law suit in the time of King John between Robert fitz Aman and Walter de Riebof, who called Simon de Kime to warranty, which Robert claimed to be the grandson and heir of Ivicia. Simon de Kime produced a charter of Henry II. to his grandfather, Simon fil William, granting this manor to him, and it remained in his family, Philip de Kime holding it in the time of Edward I. 10. — Cauz, Robert de, William de Luvitot, accounted, at the plea of G. de Clinton, for the large sum of £226 in respect of the land which Robert de Calz had with his mother (an unusual expression), from which it might appear that he had married the mother of G. Clinton ; though it may mean that Robert de Cauz had purchased the marriage of his own mother. Geoffry de Clinton, who was a chamberlain of Henry I., only sued officially. Robert de Cauz also paid 200 m. argent, for which he had been impleaded at Blythe ; and with Walter his son he paid 100 marcs of silver and one of gold for the concession of the land of Leowin Chidde (the younger). The history of this baron has hitherto remained involved in impenetrable obscurity. From after records we know that he possessed a portion of the fees of Gaufred Anselin, Ralf Hanselin, who is mentioned in this Roll, only succeeding to part of them, and these entries probably have reference to that transaction. 1 1. — Clinton, Gauf de, was excused 4d. at the Treasury at Mansfield, and 67s. 8d. Danegeld, and he seems to have impleaded concerning 30 marks, with Martin de Wateleya 46s. 8d., and with Robt. de Calz for £226, and in Rutland he was excused 28s. lod. Danegeld. 12. — Chester, The Earl, was excused payment of 56s. Dane- geld. 13. — Davidvilla, Richard, 10 m. that he should not plead for his land at Weston. 14. — Ebor, Archiepiscopus, was excused 70s. Danegelt. IS- — Faleise, Gilbert de (Physician), rendered account for 45 THE PIPE ROLLS. (^j marcs of silver for having the land and the daughter of John of Montecalvino. Id— Ferrars, Robt. de, the Earl of Derby, paid £Zo bl. for the farm of Wirksworth. Henry de Ferrars, probably a grandson of Wachiline, was excused a payment of 2s. Danegeld. I7-— Faber, Ingerano, was excused payment of /s. 8d. 1 8. — Filtham, Hugo, paid for a writ concerning his father's lands. Note.— This was probably through Hugh Bretel, whose ultimate heiress, Agatha, daughter of Hugh, married Galfrid Monachus tempe King John, the ancestor of the Musters family, and afterwards she married King John's cook, Magister Hum- phrey. 19.— Gaufred, Will fil, 17 m. for the whole of his father's lands. (It appears, however, that Osbert Sylvain, the Sheriff, paid 7 m. for a knight's fee of this barony.) 20. — Gresley, William (see Ralf Barr, No. 4). 21. — Hanselin, Ralf (see Robert de Cauz, No. 10). He accounted for cc. m. arg., and i m. in gold, for relief for his father's lands. 22. — Harper, Will le, 5 marcs for a writ of right concerning his lands. 23. — Heriz, Ivo de (it would seem that he had been Sheriff in the previous year for a half year), rendered composition of 47s. 2d. for the rents of the manors of the County, £2"] 5s. 5d. of the old farm, and £\i^ Os. gd. blanc for the old farm, and 5 dextrias that he should hold in fee-farm the land of Wilgebi. The King acquitted him of two of the dextrias at Winchester, Teste, Mile de Gloucester, and he acquitted himself against the king of three in Normandy. 24. — Ingelram, Ranulf fil (no doubt the Sheriff of Nottingham of the time of Henry II.), was excused 4s. at Mansfield, and 4s. Sd. in the Scarsdale wapentake, and paid 10 m. that he might have his land as it was before it was distrained, and he impleaded Hugh Sampson, who accounted for 15 marcs. (This was pro- bably Norton and Alfreton and Marnham.) 25. — Luzors, Robert, £Z 6s. 8d. for the old farm of Odo fil Ralf, and 2 m. of gold on a plea of extortion (accipitrum). He was also fined that he might marry the sister of Ilbert de Lacy. 14 98 THE PIPE ROLLS. 26. — Luvitot, Hugo, paid 20 marcs for a breach of the peace with the knights of Roger de Molbray. Adam Tison, the great knight of Roger de Mowbray, also rendered compensation of 10 marcs respecting the duel between himself and the knight of Hugh Luvitot. William de Luvitot compounded for the farm of Blythe for half a year £2.1 9s. 4d., and for the entertainment of the King of Scotland 43s. 5d., and for the great sum paid by Robert de Calz for his mother's land. Note. — This tenant succeeded Roger de Busli in the chief part of his fee, and he would seem to have been Sheriff for possibly the other half of the previous year, or perhaps the year previously. 27. — The Bishop of Lincoln was excused payment of 28s. Danegeld. 28. — Lerec, Osbert de, paid 4 marcs for the land which justly belonged to the Church of Blythe. 29. — Monks of Nottingham were excused payment of 25s. Danegeld. 30. — Maisnille, Gilbert de, paid £%o on account of the old farm of Odo fitz Ralf (Hubert fitz Ralf). (Proof that for some reason this last fitz Ralf's barony was in the king's hands. This family may claim a pedigree reaching within a few years from Domesday.) He also paid 20s. for his brother's land, and lO marks for the king's permission for him to marry. 31. — Misterton, Ernewi, 10 m. for a writ concerning his land. 32. — Molis, Gaufred de, 73s. 4d. on the plea of Galf de Clinton. 33. — Osgot, Presbiter, of Dronfield, 60s. on a plea. 34 — Peverel, William de, Nottingham, rendered composition of ^23 6s. 8d. for the pleas of the forest, and was excused payment of 54s. and 8d., and Adeline, his mother, was excused 1 8s. Danegeld, Hamon Peverel being excused a similar pay- ment of 20s. 35. — Porta, Swein, owed c. s. on the plea of Rann Bass. 36. — Ramentona, Nigel de, 10 m. that he should not respond to the claim of Morcardi concerning the land of his father, and he gave 7 marcs and 60s. for a plea of duel. 37. — Ruperia, Robert de, 40s. for a writ concerning his land. 38. — Samson, Hugo, 15 m. on the plea of Rann Ingelram. THE PIPE ROLLS. 99 39.— Sewel, Henry fil, 7 m. that he might be freed from his oath. (This was doubtless the knight enfeoffed by Henry de Ferrars, or his son.) 40. — Susfaeto excused 2s. and 6d. Danegeld. 41. — Taisson, Adam (see above, Hugh Lovitot). Ralf Taisson was excused payment of 9s. and lod. Danegeld. 42. — Toli, Robert fil, was excused payment of 2 marcs Dane- geld, and 8 marks for his farm ; and owed 30 m. on the plea of G. de Clinton. 43. — Watelega, Martin, accounted for 46s. 8d. on the plea of G. de Clinton. Pipe IRoll — I ibents n. (There is strictly no Roll for this year. This information is taken from that of the second year of the king.) PIRARIO Robert was sheriff for this year. The sheriffs rendered composition of £10 Ss. 4d. of the old farm. In the Treasury, £6 8s., and he owes 77s. and 4d., blanc. (This is, doubtless, of the farm of the time of King Stephen.) He also accounted for £$0 8s. for assarts. Note. — This entry is curious ; an assart was a piece of land enclosed, and won from the forest ; but this seems an enormous sum to allow for such property. Possibly Stephen had been lax with regard to forest rights in Derbyshire. We shall find, presently. King Henry H. exacting an enormous sum from the county, probably for this cause, in the 22nd year of his reign, and occasionally very large sums at other periods. The Archbishop of York was excused a payment of £24, the Earl of Ferrars of 100 shillings, and the Earl of Flanders of the same sum. The sheriff still owed £16 8s. — ^5 los. in respect of the lands of John Lupus, 42s. for the lands of Normar and Hemitar, and £6 1 6s. for the lands of the sheriff himself Note. — R. Pirario was, apparently, a knight of the Earl de Ferrars, and acted as his steward. The Red Book of the Exchequer, fol. 185, gives a short but erroneous account for this year, showing how valueless is that book except when it is fully corroborated. It states that R. Pirario accounted by the writ of the Bishop of Lincoln, and gives the amount of assarts at 100 THE PIPE ROLLS. ;^9S los. The believers in the value of the Red Book quote this return as evidence of a Pipe Roll for this year. It is, however, obviously made up from the next Roll. pipe IRo. 2, rot. 13—2 Ibenrs n. Ranulf FIL Engleram, Lord of Norton and Alfreton, Roger de Bush's tenant, was sheriff this year. He is, with good reason, supposed to be descended from Ingram, the Domesday holder of these manors. Robert, the son of this Ranulf, founded the Abbey of Beauchief in honour of St. Thomas the Martyr, and a great deal of unnecessary learning has been expended in an endeavour to fasten upon this good man's memory the stigma of actual participation in the murder of Thomas a Beckett, by identifying him with another Robert fil Ranulf, the son of Ranulf de Broc. The history of that Ranulf is not a matter of doubt. He was, beyond all controversy, Ranulf, son of Owen Porcel, a Welshman, who obtained several knights' fees from the Earl of Arundel by marriage with the heiress of Gorram. The author has given a full account of him in his work of the House of Arundel, and only refers to the matter here to dispel any doubt upon the subject, and this is necessary since so learned a writer as the late Dean Stanley has countenanced this view. If the descent of Robert fil Ranulf be discarded, a very serious blow would be struck at the proof of nearly every great pedigree in the kingdom, since we are accustomed to regard these proofs, which in their proper place will be duly advanced, as absolutely irrefragable. Ranulf fil Engelram rendered composition for the farm of Nottingham and Derby — £\2^ 14s. id. In alms (new), 2 m. in gifts to the monks of the Burton hospital, 40s., and in alms to the Canons of Derby, los. In payment of a constable, 5 Serjeants, 2 Foresters, 2 watchers, and i porter, £z\ by Peter de Goldington. In the rents of the king's manors for the whole County, ;^i8o I4d., and money spent at the lead mines, £\%. In lands given to the Earl of Flanders in Duneham (Notts.), £60. (As this was a manor of ancient demesne, this grant would expire with the life of the king. Hence it was renewed). £7 for the farm of Derlington ; Danegeld, for both counties, THE PIPE ROLLS. iqi ;^38 Ss. sd. ; Burgess aid, ;^is ; in waste, ;^7 los. ; 80 m. of the gift of the county ; c. s. for the aid of Derby ; i m. for the pleas of the forest ; ;^I03 i8s. 6d. for the lands of William Peverel ; for the rents of the manors, ^94 6s. 2d. ; and in payment of 8 Foresters, and i warrener, £6 Ss. ; and in rents of the manors, per Frog, Arch, de, ;^ii 13s. lod.. Also lands given to Robert fil Hugh, in Claword, H2s. Note. — This was land of ancient demesne, and it appears to have been regranted to this family on several occasions. Their chief residence was in Hartshill, Warwickshire. In I John this grant was repeated to William, son of Hugh, for the same sum. In 6 Henry III. William de Hardreshill (or Hartshill) fined with the king for having the town of Claworth, which concerned him as his inheritance ; and in 10 Henry III.' Robert de Hartshill fined for his relief, and had the lands which William, his father, held of the king in capite in Claworth. About the reigns of King John and Henry III. many of the manors of the ancient demesne of the crown were granted out as if they belonged to the king himself. William Briwere, the great judge and regent of Richard I., obtained for himself the honour of Chesterfield in the same way, holding it by knightservice, instead of at a fee-farm rent; and in 31 Henry III. William de Hardeshill exchanged the fee-farm rent of 112s. for a mewed sparhawk, a common payment for a fee. It would seem that the D'Aubinis held Claworth of Robert de Hartshill as late as the reign of Richard II. In a suit in the time of Edward I. the ancestor of Robert de Hartshill is called Robert de Austric. It has been contended that this family are identical with the Herthills of Ashborn, but this seems doubtful. Avenel, Gervase, paid 20 marcs for the land of Basselaw (Baslow). This is a portion of the king's (ancient demesne) manor of Ashford, which was part of the king's manor of Bakewell, of which Robert de Ferrars had the farm at the time of the first great Roll of the Pipe, and probably much earlier. This entry would seem to show that at this period the two manors were kept separate, as we shall see this manor also came to be considered the inheritance of the Avenels. Buron, Roger, owed 40 marcs for the relief of his lands. Luvetot, Richard, paid 20 m. for his marriage, and i trained Norr, and i Gerfalcon. The following persons were excused payment this year for Danegeld : — The Bishop of Lincoln, 25s. ; Henry Hose, 5s. ; 102 THE PIPE ROLLS. Peter Toli, 24s. ; Rand Vic (sheriff), 3s. ; Dnio de Rutland, 72s. ; the land of William Pevrel, £y 9s. ; Earl of Flanders, 24s. From the Burgess Aid— Richard de St. Remigio, 5s. ; Rand Vic, Ss. From the Donation of the County — Dnio de Rutland, 42s. ; Eari Flanders, 14s. ; Mannasah Biset, 8s. ; Rand Vic, I m. In Flora, the land of Robert fil Swain (Sawini), 30s. ; excused Nigel de Broc, 2 m. ; the monks of Gerolden, los. Note. — There is a charter (printed in the "Records of Notting- ham ") being a confirmation to the Palmers of Nottingham of certain land given them by Robert de St. Remigio to establish a hospital for entertaining poor men for the repose of the soul of Richard de St. Remigio, his brother (no doubt the person mentioned above), which was confirmed by Geoffrey, Archdeacon of Canterbury 1162-74, to which a famous Nottingham knight, Ralf fitz Stephen, was also a witness. Comparing these entries with those of the first great Roll of the Pipe, we are met by this remarkable fact, which shows conclusively that they were quite apart as to date, that, with the exception of the sheriff, Ranulf fitz Ingram, there is not one single person who is mentioned in both Rolls ; and we cannot be quite sure that even in this solitary instance, as fitz Ingram came to be a surname, that we have not here two persons, successors to the same estate, father and son, or possibly brethren. But although there is no other individual of the same Christian name, there are several possessing the same surname. The first Roll has William Bisset ; that of 2 Henry 2, Manassah. The first has Hugo and William de Luvetot ; the second, Richard. The first has also Robert fil Toli : the second, Peter. There is a remarkable statement in the Records of the Borough of Nottingham, which would date the charter of that town as of the first year of King Henry's reign, whereas, it is clearly attested by Ranulf, the Sheriff, at York. This Roll shows that Ranulf was not sheriff that year, and therefore it must be a later date — 11 57-1 167. Professor Stubbs, Itenerary of Henry II. in Chron. of Benedict Abbas ii., p. cxxix., is cited as an authority for the erroneous date. THE PIPE ROLLS. 103 pipe iRo. 3, r. 13.-3 ibenrg ii. Ranulf fil Ingelram, sheriff. This year in adequietatione corredio — that is, providing for the entertainment of the king at Peak Castle, ^10 i6s. ; it was expended through Nigel de Broc, and for the King of Scotland in Nottingham and at Peak, £t,-j 12s. 3d. This item is curious, and demands attention. Did the Scotch king reside here as an enemy or as a friend } In expenses for wine at Peak, 72s. In pardon, Richard and Baldwin Lupars, and Havis de Dum. Robert de Chalz rendered composition of 20 marcs for the administration of the forests or for the office of Forester (pro- ministerio Foresti). Note. — This latter entry is one of very great interest. It shows that Robert de Chalz was then acting as chief forester ; the previous year, the sheriff having been allowed the expenses of the forests through Peter de Goldington, who was probably the king's escheator, or some officer of the exchequer. Ipipe IFlo. 4, r. 14—4 Ibenrg II. Ranulf fil Ingelram, sheriff. He accounts, as in the second year of the king, for the farm of Wm. Peverel, i^l/S, Robert de Pirario is still indebted to the Treasury. There are several new fines this year. The sheriff accounted for lo m. concerning a dual between Hunfred and Harald. And immediately follows a statement that the Earl Ferrars was excused this. Harald, then, was probably his tenant. He had one surnamed de Leke. Wills, Cut, lO m. for some venison trespass. Gaufrey Salvage, Richard Propositus, of Ernhale, Alan de Neville, the same sum. Erchenbaldi paid 5 silver marcs for the lesser men of Peck. The land of William Peverel brought in ;^I00 and iSs. In lands given to Robert de Piesse in Newbold, the king's manor of ancient demesne, ;^43, and in Blisworth ; £\o to Gauf de Briuncourt in Foston and Ernebi ; 20s. to the monks 104 THE PIPE ROLLS. of Basingworth in Langenedale ; and los. to the monks of Gerolden. The minters of Nottingham accounted for 43 m. through Henry fil Gerold. The sheriff accounted for ^93 6s. 8d. of the gift of the county. The payments of the following were excused : — Manassah Biset, 12s. 8d. ; Peter de Sandiacre, 8s. 2d. ; monks of Combremara, 8s. 6d. ; the Bishop of Lincoln, 30s. ; Hugo the Prior, iSd. ; the monks of Rufford, los. ; Jordan Taisson, 5s.; the demesne lands of William Peverel, lOOS. ; in Rutland, 78s., of which Robert Goebold ought to render composition of the lands of the brother of the king, los. ; the knight Templars, 6s. ; monks of Gerolden, 4s. 4d. ; the brothers of the hospital, los. ; Havise de Cotgrave, 6s. 6d. ; and the sheriff himself, 253. 2d. Richard and Baldric Lupars, the canons of Depedale, and Havise de Dum were also excused payments. This donation was evidently a forced loan, or it would have been unnecessary to excuse those who did not pay. It was possibly an early instance of those benevolences which caused so much Puritan discontent in the time of the Stuarts, and which occasioned so much strife in the reign of this king's son. lIMpe IRo. 5, r. 23—5 Ibenrs II. The sheriff, Ranulf fil Ingram, accounted for ;^i68 of the gift of the knights of Nottinghamshire ; 20 m. of the gift of the burgesses of Nottingham; 10 m. from Derby; and 20s. from Peverel sthorpe ; the sheriff himself, 10 m. The following were excused payment : — Hugo de Hamesclape, 8 m. ; Rad de Bealmeis, 2 m. ; Robert de Tenerchebrai, 2 m. ; William, the brother of the king, 6 m. ; Hugo Prior, 6 m. ; Gauf Abbot, 4 m. ; Robert, son of the sheriff, 7 m. ; Simon fil Richard, 2 m. ; Philip de Kim (Chib), i m. ; David de Rumenel, 2 m. ; Walter Bech, 2 m. ; the brothers of the hospital, 2 m. ; monks of Gerolden, i m. Wacheline the minter owed ;^ioo, and paid ^50. William Tisun owed x. marcs. THE PIPE ROLLS. 105 pipe mo. 0, r. 21—6 Ibenrg II. Ranulf fil Ingram, sheriff. TERRA COMITIS DE FERRARS. Robert de Pirario rendered composition of ^92 9s. 4d. for the lands of the Earl of Ferrars. (He was no doubt the sheriff of I Henry II.) Note. — This shows that the Earl of Ferrars was in disgrace : that his lands, for some reason, were in the king's hands. He appears to have assumed the title of the Earl of Nottingham, for King Henry is said to have forbidden his son William to adopt it a year later, when, on his father's death, he succeeded to his inheritance. Stephen is said to have conferred upon Robert de Ferrars, in recognition of his great services at the Battle of the Standard, the title of Earl of Derby, but he seems to have been deprived of it also, and his son not allowed to bear either title. He was still permitted to rank as an earl, and to bear that title, but he had not the profits of the County : the earl's third penny, as it was called, a matter of great importance in those days. From the payments made this year the following were excused : — The Bishop of Chester, 24s., and in Rutland 30s., of which Robert Goeb rendered composition ; the monks of Rufford, 7s. ; and William, the king's brother, 2s. pipe mo. 7.-7 Denru II. Ranulf fil Ingelram, sheriff. Hugo and Ulfgirt rendered composition of £^0 for the farm of Dunham (which formerly the Count of Flanders held), and 25 s. Lupariis. Ralf Hanzelin and Robert de Cauz were each excused pay- ment of ;f20. Richard de Cornhill was fined 5 m. for a dual. William de Valdari, 2 m. ; William Cade, ;^io. A Ralf Medicus is mentioned. 15 I06 THE PIPE ROLLS. pipe IRo. 8—8 Ibenrs H- Ranulf fil Ingelram, sheriff, accounted for Danegeld,;^ 76 9s. 3d. The following were excused : — William, brother of the king, 3s. ; the Earl of Leicester, 12s. ; Gilbert de Saupingham, Nicol de Sigil ; Hugh Bardolf, 4s. 6d. ; Walter Bee, 4s. ; William Austcar. The sheriff was allowed ;£'20 expenses of Robert fil Sawini. The sheriff rendered composition for the scutage. Ralf Hanselin, 25 m. ; and Robert de Calz, 15m.; knights of William Peverel excused ; William, brother of the king, 40s. ; Hugh the Prior, Robert, son of the sheriff, 40s. ; Walter Bech, i m. ; Philip de Kime, ^ m. ; David Maresce, i m. Tichell, Philip de Chimbe (Kime), rendered composition for the farm of Doncaster ; Robert, son of the sheriff, 2 m. ; Alexander fil Toche, 2 m. ; Hugo Maresc, Robert de Jort, Rad Basset. The men of Derby paid 40 m. that William Astcari should not have the town (to farm), and they for many years continued to farm it. pipe mo. 9—9 ibenrg II. Ranulf fil Ingelram, sheriff. Farm of Peverel produced ;^8o 3s. 4d. Lands given to Gerbod Escals ^^20, and 17s. in Langar and Clifton (out of Peverel's fee). (This is the first mention of the name of Escals.) Monks of Gerolden, los. ; in Cortingstock (Basil's fee), Costo Falconer, £6 los. ; in Huchenel and Cherchebi (William Peverel's fee), and in 2 mills, and £4 for forest waste, and £6 5s. was allowed for constable, 8 Foresters, and 1 warrener ; and in the expenses for 2 watchers and a porter at Peak, £4. los. ; and in guarding the venison to London from Nottingham and Peak, £y, by the king's writ ; and in repairing the king's house at Nottingham, ^26 8s. ptpe IR0. 10—10 Ibenrs n. Ralf fil Engelram, sheriff. He was allowed the canons of Sherwood, ;^40, by the charity of the king, and for lead for the use of the king at Peak, £9 8s. 2d. THE PIPE ROLLS lo/ pipe IRo. II -II ibenrg li. Robert FITZ Ralf the sheriff this year. The sheriff accounted for £26 13s. 4d. for the burgh of Nottingham, and 20 m. for Derby. Robert fitz Hugh 54s. 2d., for conducting the king's venison from Peak to Woodstock, and 112s. for Claworth. £1^ 4s. for the farm of Lindibi. Lands given to the monks of Lenton, 50s. ; one mill. £21 4s. 4d. for the farm of Melburn. £a^ for Bulwell, escheated lands. 22s. 7d. for the market of Chesterfield. ;£^2o de- censu of the forest of Nottingham. Robert fil Ralf (probably the son of the sheriff) rendered composition of 40 m. for Tickhill for a quarter of the year. Robert de Calz, 40 m., in misericordia ; Robert de Davaill, ;^iOO, idem. Walli de Estweit, 10 m. ; Helius de Peck, 10 m. Hubert fil Ralf rendered composition of ;f 20 for the army of Wales. The following were excused :— Ralf fil Stephen, 26s. 8d.; Ralf Hanselin, £16 13s. 4d. ; Hascul Musard, £7 17s. 6d. ; Robert de Calz, £\0 ; Roger de Buron, 10 m. The sheriff accounted for ;^27 for the knights of the Hon. of Peverel. The following were excused: — Warner de Insula, 40 m. ; the brothers of the hospital, i m. ; and in the demesne of Bolsover, 33s. 4d. Ralf de Belfou rendered composition for 38s. 6d., Manassa Biset, and the mother of Will de Curci the same ; the lands of Painell, 453. gd. pipe IR0. 12.-12 Ibenrg ii. Robert fitz Ralf, sheriff. The canons of Sherwood accounted for Ss. in Papewich, and roos. in Oswardebec, of new gift; and in discharge of the land of Baldwin Lupars, 4d., by the king's writ; and in Empenng- ham, the lands of Richard the Abbot, for the 3rd part of the year. I08 THE PIPE ROLLS. THE FOLLOWING FINES (NEW PLEAS AND NEW CONVENTIONS). Ralf Bealfo, 5 m. ; Henr. Medicus, 20s. 8d. ; Will fil Ralf, 1 m. for forest ; Rad de Hereford, 20s. ; Henr. Tuchet, £4 ; Orm de Wandeslega, los. ; Sweyn de Bulwel, 40s. ; Hunfr. de Tocha, 2 m. ; Wm. fil Reni, 2 m. ; Romeisus Forestar, I m. ; Wm. fil Wulmari, 20s., de misericordia ; Roger de Huccenal, 6s. 8d., de foresta. The following were excused : — Costo Falconer, half a marc; Ric de Ruishala, los. ; Nicol de Trowell, i m.; Bonda de Acra de Lindebi, los. ; Walter Torchard, ^ m. ; Malger Blund, 2 m. ; Renialdus de Aslacton, J m. ; Rad Torchard, 5 m. ; Swein Hemingellune, i m. ; Jordan de Carlton, i m. ; Walter de Mistona, i m. ; Hugo de Stratton, Wills Wellu, Adam de Stratton, the same ; Wm. Castellan, 20s. ; Lambert de Clumber, 20s. ; Roger de Clippeston, i m ; Rad de Mapelbec, i m. ; Robert Chirchini, | m. ; Siward de Rippelea, Peter de Lega, ^m; Robert de Calz owes ^17 l6s. de misericordia, and ac- counts for p^20 for the amerciaments (de censu) of the forest. Robert de Nevil accounts for ^^ 50. THE SHERIFF'S ACCOUNTS FOR THE CHATTLES OF THOSE CONDEMNED TO DEATH, AND OF THOSE WHO PERISHED BY THE ORDEAL OF WATER. Roger de Elveston, i m. ; Norman, i is. 4d. ; Swein Hoc, 37s. 6d. ; Robert Friend, lis. 8d. ; Robert Barate, 2is. ; Bernard de Gatteford, 9s. ; Serlo de Hulmo, los. ; Peter de Crosswell, 46s. 4d. ; Letwin de Brettby, 5s. 6d. ; Aluric de Ekington, 23s. 6d. ; Azor, 6is. lod. ; Haterist, 43s. ; Cnut de Stock, i6s. ; Odo de Normanton, 3s. gd. ; Robert Lund, 58s. 6d. ; Step de Redclive, 12s. 4d. ; Rob de Cruce, 3s. 6d. ; Walter fil Hugo, 15s. ; Wineman de Waneton, 6d. ; Rich Harel, 5s. 6d. ; Wedon, 70s. ; Lefwino Bissop, 28s. 5d. ; Godfrey de Hetcote, i6s. ; Heward de Normanton, 13s.; Sunnulf de Hemodestun, 20s.; Robert Undai, 36s. ; Alan de Bilburc, 3s. ; Herbert de Bontes- ham, 47s. 6d. ; Wachiline de Smedesbi, i6d. ; Gilbert de Ocbrook, i8d. ; Roger de Mapelbec, I2d. THE PIPE ROLLS. 109 pipe IRo. 13.-13 ibenrg li. Robert fil Ralf, sheriff. PLACITA OF EARL GAUFRY AND RICHARD DE LUCY. The following were fined : — Peter de Goldington, 40s. ; Walter de Burton, i m. ; Serlo de Turlaveston paid 10 marcs to have the proceedings of an appeal against him (if there should be one) adjourned ; Swein de Holland, i m. ; Gauf Torchard, 4 m. ; Nic de Trowell, i. Ralf Blund accounted . for the old farm of Doncaster. Rich Ursel accounted for Robert de Calz. Hugh Placket. Fines : — Roger Walter, sheriff, 40s. ; Norman fil Wulfi, Nic de Hanton, los. ; Regin de Bestorp, | m. ; Alan Cufford, do. ; Walter Estweit, do. ; Hugh de Hoveringham, Wm. fil Alan de Derby, los. ptpe IRo. 14—14 Denrs H- Robert fil Ralf, sheriff 3 parts of the year ; WILLIAM FIL Ralf, ^th. The sheriff accounted for 66s. for the lands of Rad Hanselin, in two bailiwicks. Reginald de Luce, £20, de censu foreste de Nottingham. Gauf Torchard, 2 m. DE PLACITA ALAN DE NEVILLE. FOR THE AID FOR THE MARRIAGE OF THE KING'S DAUGHTER. (One marc for each knight's fee.) Roger de Buron, 10 m. for 10 knights' fees ; Robt. de Calz, 1 2j ; knight Templars, Ss. 6d.; the brethren of the hospital, 3s. gd.; Rad Hanselin, 25 m., and remains of his demesne, I2i m., which is in the king's hands; Hasculf Musard, 12 m.; Hubert fitz Ralf, 20 m., and he owes 28s. 6d. ; Robert de Chaucis, i m. ; Com de Ferrars, 685 m. The sheriff accounted for the knights of William Peverel, ^40 6s. 8d. Excused Warner de Insula, 3 m. no THE PIPE ROLLS. In Empingham, Rich Abbis, 2 m., and in Bolsover, 2^ m. ; the brethren of the hospital, 1 3s. 8d. ; forest wastes, £4 ; allowed £6 Ss. for constable, 8 foresters, i warrener for the Honour of Peverel. In Peck, £4 I OS. for 2 watchers and i porter, and for i palfry, and I fugat (courser) ; for the use of Matilde, the king's daughter, 36s. ; and for payment of 2 pedicators (snarers), who went to Normandy to kill wolves, los. Reginald de Lucy owes ;^I5 i6s., de misericordia ; Robert de Calz, Peverelsthorpe, Gilbert de Semplingham, los. ; William fil Alan, £4 8s. iid; Spunde and Chaddesden, los. : it rests until the king returns into England. Avice, widow of Roger Makefield, owes 20 m. for the goods and debts of her husband, by the pledge of the sheriff himself In pardon : Ralf fitz Stephen Chamberlain, 26s. 8d. ; 57s. 8d. of the aid of the knights of the honour of William Peverel, and remain in Newhall, sup Northampton, of which Simon fil Peter rendered account. IPfpe Bo. 15.-15 Ibenr^ ll. William fitz Ralf, sheriff. THE AID FOR MARRYING THE KING'S DAUGHTER. Gladwin and other men of Melburn, £4 ; Snotington (Sneyn- ton), 5 m. ; Bulwell, i m. ; the men of Wilford, 10 m. ; Berneston, \ m. ; Bolsover, 5 m. ; Mansfield, 20 m. ; Oskenton, 20 m. ; Edenstowe, 3 m. ; soke of Oswardsbec, 18 m. ; Clipston, i m. ; Derlington, 4 m. ; Chesterfield, icos. ; Wirksworth, 30 m. ; Bakewell, Hissord, and Hoppa, 30 m. ; Karrlinton, 2 m. ; Beston, 10 m. ; Arnhale, 5 m. ; Wudburc, \ m. ; Empingham, 2 m. ; soch and stoc lands of Rad Hanselin, 2 m. ; Raalund, 20s. ; Ratcliff Avoral de Pusei, 20s. ; the Burghs of Derby, ;^20, and Nottingham, £26 13s. 4d. The sheriff renders account of 100 m. of the debt of the county for defaults, and the following are excused : — The Knight Templars, los. ; the brethren of the hospital, i8s. iid. ; William Basset, 7s. 3d., and in Rutland, 60s. for 36 carucates of THE PIPE ROLLS. m and, which belong to the county of Nottingham, but for which Simon Basset ought to account. Fines : Rad de Herford, J ; Harald de Lech, i m. for disseisin unjustly ; the bail for Chambleng, i m., because they did not produce him before the justices ; John de Aincourt, 40s. for unjust disseisin ; Swein de Mapelton, i m. for choosing jurors ; Robert Prest, I m. the goods of a fugitive ; Henry fil Roll, i ; Thomas de Nottingham, i m. for having writ of right for i mill. PLEAS OF WM. BASSETT AND ALAN DE NEVILL. Fines, etc. : Ralf Belvoir (Bellafago), 20s. ; Ralf de Carlton, J m. ; Regin de Thorp, i m. ; Ada de Schereston, I m. ; Henry fil Fulcher, 2 m. for his son and his nephew, for whom he was bail, and who did not appear. (This was the first knight of Henry de Ferrars, and it may explain the extinction of that family. Probably they were involved in Henry Ferrars rebellion, and fled the country.) Nigel de Bubenden, i m. ; Roger de Kniveton owes half a marc for his brother, whom he promised to produce, and did not ; David de Stanton, f m. because he unjustly detained the dowry of Alizie de Trussel ; Galf de Roche, ^ m ; Richard Dapifer, of the Earl of Ferrars, owes 10 m. for a duel which he promised to wage in the king's court by decree of the earl's court, and in which he made default, but he ought to answer in Berkshire ; Roger Garnet, J m. ; Hugh Bardolf, 10 m. in respect of a suit between him and John Burdon, and 10 m. in respect of bail between him and William and John Burdon ; William de Stanley, J m. for a default ; Richard de Selleby, los. for not producing the man for whom he was bail ; William de Heriz, 20s., de misericordia ; Robert de Herovill, ^ m. ; Arnulf de Eton, Hugo de Levine, Robert, parson of Marcham, Roger Mercator de Wimunton, 40s. ; Godric de Dunham, Reginald fitz Thurkill, Robert fitz Walter, Rich fitz Levene, and Robert de Morhala, together i m.; Peter de Dreiton, Osbert Propositus, of Lalega, Robert de Burton, Rich de Arnhall, Richard Barret, Hereward and his companions, Gilbert Coke de Linton, Galf de Newtorp, Walter de Stratton, Walter de Montgomery, 40s. ; Ailward de Buttebi, Canons de Novoloco, through their bail, Robert, J m. 112 THE PIPE EOLLS. pipe IRo. 16.-16 Ibenrs n. William fil Ralf, sheriff. Robert fil Ralf rendered account for ;^8 13s. 2d. of the debt of the county, for default, and mercy ; and in the honour of Wareng, 7s. 46. DE PLAC WM. BASSET AND ALAN DE NEVEL. Andrew Picot, 40 m. for having the king's peace ; Peter de Goldington, 2 hawks ; Fulco de Norwell, ^ ; Chog Bataille, i ; Osbert Propositus de Oscinton, i ; H'man de ead, Turstin de Sudwell, Berewald, Robert, the man of Wm. Vesci, Bernard de Peleslia, Will Escorceveille, Robert de Marnham, Helias de Wud- house. Math, and John account for £8 for having the goods of Stephen the forester. The sheriff accounts for ;£'8o 28s 8d. for the wastes and assarts of Nottingham and Derby. In pardon : The canons of Semperingham and Jordan Taisson, 20s. ; Ralf fil Stephen, 22s. The sheriff accounts for^^S 6s., the chattels of Wm. Bedewai, the gaoler of Nottingham. Robert fil Ralf accounts for ^9 13s. 4d., the wastes and assarts of Peak ; £8 bl., of the old farm of Nottingham and Derbyshire, and for the new farm for half a year, and for lands given in both counties ^35 15s. 6d. pipe IR0. 17.-17 Ibenrg ii. William fitz Ralf, sheriff. He accounts for ;^38 14s. 8d. bl. for the old farm of Notting- ham and Derby. For operations upon the castle of Nottingham ;^40 13s. 3d. tale, ^38 14s. 8d. bl. by the writ of the king, and under the supervision of Reginald de St. Maria, Pagan de Chesterfield, and Henry Leech (Medicus). The Earl of Boulogne is mentioned instead of the Earl of Flanders as hitherto. For conducting William de Holland, an outlaw, from London THE PIPE ROLLS. 113 to Nottingham, and from thence to York, 20s. For further works upon the castle of Nottingham, ;^388 2s. id. Reginald de Lucy accounted for ;^is i6s. de misericordia of Robert de Calz, excused payment by the king's writ, and ;^20 de censu foreste Nottingham. TOWARDS THE AID FOR MARRYING THE KING'S DAUGHTER. Hubert fitz Ralf 22d., the Hon. of Wm. Peverel 4s. 46., for the debt of the county 64s. iid. The sheriff accounted for;£"i8 9s. 4d. for the pleas of the forest. Reginald Monetarius 60s. pro recreantisa sua (absenting himself). The sheriff accounted for the goods of outlaws. Wm. Francis Ss. gd., Warner de Stanley lOs., de Agemund 2s., 104s. 6d. for the lands of Wm. Heriz, 7s. for honey sold and the hides of mares. £12 OS. lod. for the pannage of Sherwood, £6 3s. 4d. for Cnot, 22s. 3d. for Galtris, 9s. 4d. Kenefare. HONOR WILLI PEVEREL. Robert fil Ralf accounts for £1^ 12s. lod. for the old farm of the same honor in the treasury 2s. 6d., and to Meredith and Roger de Powis 46s. 8d., by the writ of Rich de Lucy and for works at Clipston 46s. 8d., and for the entertainment of Hugo Wake, with the huntsmen and hounds of the king, 10 m. pipe IRo. 18—18 Iftenrg IL Willi, fil Ralf, sheriff. The sheriff was allowed ;^233 os. 6d. for the works on the castle of Nottingham, under the inspection of Robert fil Ralph, William fil Robert, Henry Leche, Reginald St. Maria, and Pagan de Chesterfield. For 40 caretates of lead for the king's house at Winchester _;^io, and for enclosing the Haia around the king's house at Clipston 20s., by the view of Ralf de Wellebeuf and William fil Rein. 16 114 THE PIPE ROLLS. In operations upon the king's house at Clipston 433., by the view of Thorn de London and Wm. fil Rein. The sheriff accounts for £4 19s. 4d. for corn sold off the land of William de Heriz in the said (past) year, ;^3i los. for the farm of the lands of the said William, for stocking the same lands 28 oxen and 3 affrus (cart-horses) £4 14s., and for 400 sheep £6 13s. 4d., and for 15 Ruscis (bee hives) los., and for 5 cows los., and for 20 scrofifis (sows), and 3 verres (boars), 15s. 4d. The sheriff accounts for 40s. for the mines of the Peak this year, £1^ 6s. 8d. for wastes and assarts of Nottingham and Derbyshire. The monks of Rufford excused payment of the same sum, with 12s. 8d. the pleas of the forest. I2s. for the sale of two oxen, which William Foljambe left to his lord the king by testament. This is an interesting item, not only because it is the first mention of this eminent family in the Rolls, but as an early instance of bequeathing a heriot to the king. The sheriff also accounted for 15s. 4d., the goods of a woman " submersed," probably drowned, by the ordeal of water. NEW PLEAS. Legardis, widow of Ralf fitz Leofwin, and her son paid ;^40 for having the goods and debts of her husband. The scutage of those barons who did not go with the king into Ireland, nor sent knights or money there instead. Thomas Bardolf paid j£2^ scutage for the knights' fees of Rad Hanselin. The sheriff accounted for ;^4 for the knights' fees, which were William de Heriz's. Richard Mantel and William fitz Ralph accounted for the pannage of the king's forests throughout England, 32s. 2d. for Scardebuc, 15s. for Pickering, ;£i2 4s. 4d. for Cumberland, £4 19s. for Stanley, 67s. for the New Forest, 9s. for Gravlings, 78s. for the whole of Essex, 45s. for Brolliis de Rutland, ^21 los. 8d. for Dean, 55s. for Hefordshire in Wales, 27s. 2d. for Fechham, 2s. Sd. for Hanley, 36s. 8d. for Northumber- land, _£6 15s. for Windelsore, all due for the past year; for the present— ^7 12s. for the New Forest, 38s. for Northumberland, 26s. 8d. for Kenoc, 30s. for Scardburc, 15s. for Pickering, 2s. for THE PIPE ROLLS. 1 15 Langwad, ^£4 8s. for Galtris, 8s. for Gravlings, /^6 Windsor, 17s. 4d. Monte Gislibte, los. Sd. Haiar de Stanleye, 5s. for Lechei, 60s. id. for Essex, for the past year 59s. 6d. for Sherlet, los. ^d. for Ernestrew, £8 7s. gd. for Cumberland, for the perquisites and small accounts of the king ; 5s. for a hound ; 8s. for the goods of Ralf, who perished in the ordeal of water ; 17s. for the goods of Ralf of Burebeche, 12s. 2d. for the goods of William fil Eve, an out- law; 25 s. for the goods of Wm. Brockhurst, i8s. Ailwin Coister, 20s. Wulfre Palmer, ;^I7 3s. 4d. Alured de Ketelston, who perished in the water ordeal ; 7s. for cortice (qy. bark) sold, with 4d. for wax (burnt) before the king, 4d. for honey, and los. for 2 hounds, 3s. 4d. for honey at the Haia at Clipstone, i6s. goods of William Warin, and 2s. 6d. of Rich Croc, an outlaw, Arti de Croc, Robt. de Croc, and Godwin de Nieuton. pipe IRo. 19.-19 Ibenrg II. Will fil Ralf, sheriff. For the corredy of the wife of Rich Esse, whilst the king was in Ireland, 38s. 4d. For sending (locand; 41 carpenters and their master 6 days to the army at Leicester, for making machines of war, 62s. 6d. For operations upon the castle of Nottingham, the houses within the same castle, and gaol ;^I40 ; and in provisioning (warnisione) the castle of Nottingham 33 quarters of corn 48s. 4d., 40 bacons £4 iSs. 6d., and for salt 50s. 7d., 120 (cascis) cheeses 41s. 6d., iron 153. 2d., 7 manuniols lOs., for carbon 3s. 7d. ; and in provisioning the castle of Bolsover 40 ■ quarters of corn 5 3s. 4d. 20 bacons i8s., 60 cheeses 19s. 8d. ; and in furnishing the castle of Peak 20 measures (summis) of corn Sos. 6d., 20 bacons 39s. And for entertaining 20 knights ^20 (20 days), of which ;^I7 is deducted from the farm of the county. The sheriff accounts for £1$ ISs. for the farm of the lands of Wm. de Heriz for the half-year. Reginald de Lucy 40s. for operations at the king's castle of Bolsover, and ^46 los. for Peak, also £41 los. 3d. on the same by the view of Robt. Avenel, Robert de Hopa, Serlo de Plesley, and Gervase Avenel ; and in the expenses of the knights and their followers (servienti) at Nottingham, Bolsover, and Peak, ;^I3S. Il6 THE PIPE ROLLS. pipe mo. 20—20 Denrs n. Will fil Ralf, sheriff. Eudo de Fontibus £10 in Carlton for half a year. Works upon the castle of Nottingham, by the view of Regin de St. Maria, Hy. Leche, and Robt. fil Ralf, £17 l8s. 8d. ; at Bolsover 40s., by the same overseers ; and in victualling the castle of Nottingham 80 quarters of corn 80s. 3d., 40 bacons S6s. 9d., 7s. 7d. for salt, 12^ quarters of brasio (barley) 12s. 3d., for 1000 quartells (qy. loaves, the original of the quartern) 4s. 6d. For works in the gaol in the town of Nottingham 56s. gd. Reginald Lucy, ;£25 for provisions for 20 knights and 60 servienti (attendant men-at-arms) resident in the king's castles of Nottingham, Bolsover, and Peak ; and Richard Grasso $ m. ; and for corn, bacons, salt, and other things for use in the castle of Montsorel, by Eustace fil Stephen, ;^I5 2s. New pleas, &c. Will de Heriz accounted for 100 marcs for a fine which he made for having back his lands. The sheriff accounts for ;£i4 8s. for the Assizes of Oswardebec, and owes 8s. 4d., which remains owing from Grun de Leverton ; ;^8 for the Assizes in the Norman borough of Nottingham, and for the other borough 3s. 4d. ; 2 m. for the goods of Falcon Flanders and of German Flanders, ;£i4 los. 8d. for the Assizes of Chesterfield, ;^i6 15s. 4d. Mansfield, and Ernhale civ. s. (Of course these Assizes were not the great Assizes of the king, but only those of the Hundred Courts of these districts, probably only the Assize of Bread and Ale, as it was called.) And in operations upon the castles of Peak and Bolsover by Robert Avenel and Serlo Pleslie. Robert fil Ralf accounts for ;£ij 4s. 8d. for the army of Ireland, and for the demesne of William Heriz ^^4, for which he should account in Nottingham, because it was at that time in the king's hands ; excused Henry Forester 30s., Ralf fil Amauri 20s., Simon fil Simon 20s. For the demesne of Reg de Heckham 60s., for which account was rendered in Northamptonshire ; and for the demesne of Reg de Empingham 20s., for that of Richard de Bolsover 60s. Fines concluded by Wm. Barret, John Maid, and John Clic THE PIPE ROLLS. 1 17 pipe no. 21—21 Iftenrp II. Wm. fil Rad, sheriff, who accounted for ;£yc, 16s. 2d. bl. for the old farm of Nottingham and Derby, of which ^23 17s. bl. was imposed upon Nottingham, on account of the war, during the king's pleasure, and ;£? bl. upon Derby, ;^2i bl. upon Wirksworth. — See Claworth, Robert fil Hugh. In operations upon the castle of Nottingham and the king's bedchamber (thalami) in the same, ^46. For doing justice between Richard Becce and Wiote 5s. For keeping the bear house and the king's bears, and for repairing the chains (Cathena) of the said Ursary, 40s. 5d., and for 200 bars (ligonibus) 33s. 4d. Grun de Leverton 12s. 4d., and 22s. for the Assize of Oswarde- becti. (Grun paid up his arrears this year.) placita 5e IRanu ©lanvUle an5 Ibugb 5e dressf. (This of course was the great Chief Justice, holding a grand Assize. Here we only obtain what is pertinent to the exchequer.) Sewell fil Fulcher, 10 m. for having an Assize ; Turbert de Radlun, i for denying his bail. Wimund id Maurice de Blackwell, Reginald de Blackwell, Lefric his brother, Richard de Briminton, Vill de Torpinton 20s., for harbouring Gilbert, an enemy of the king. Will fil Uctred 20s., Hascul Musard 5 m., Hugh de Leicester, 3 m., Heming de Tanesley Drum, of the same town ; Gode de ead. Will de Piris, Ralf de Hetcona (probably Hethcote), Will de Bentley, Gamel de Haleshoppe (Alsop), Robt. fil Ailward, Walter de Skeggibi, Robert la Burguniun, Henry fil Fulcher. (Both Sewell and Henry fil Fulcher, the knights of the Earl of Derby, seem to have been at law, and one of them was amerced.) PLEAS TAKEN AT NOTTINGHAM. Simon fil Richard 20 m., Roger de Capella lO m. for an assault on the house of Robert de Monastariis ; Ailfus Pepillari, Henry de Clinton 22s., and owed lOOS. for having a writ of right concerning one fee against the Earl de Ferrars, Ralf Clou de Fer Il8 THE PIPE ROLLS. Hugh de Bussei (Busli), Robert de Busseia (Busli), Roger de Stokes, Roger de Ferendon, William Bous, Robt. de Scarlar, Hugh de Balderton, William de Bingham, Wm. de Ferendon. The lands of William de Diva in Baldton ; Richard Walens, los. ; Walerand de Standford, and Wm. de Colwich was fined for selling a horse to the king's enemies ; Fridbor (Frank pledge) of the lands of Robert de Chaucis, Durand de Gunaldeston, Henry de Eicring, Gilbert Carpenter de Thurgarton, Henri fil Gilbert. (Curiously there was a great family — the Bisets — who were benefactors of Thurgarton, who were called Carpenter. This entry probably relates to a veritable carpenter, for the next entry is of 59s. 5d. for wood sold.) pipe IRo. 22—22 ibenri? li. In operations upon the castle of Peak .;^I3S, by the view of Robert de Hopa, Warin fil Robert, Wm. Avenel (the first mention of his name), Gervase Avenel, and Robt. de Herthill (the first of the family of the Peak, whose heiress married Cockayne). And for a substitute for Durand Osteille whilst he was ill (infirmabat) lOOs. And for keeping the bears, and in expenses attending the Ursary of the king, and conducting the bears from Nottingham to Winchester, 76s. 8d. And for corn and wine (blado et fino) which the king com- manded to be bought for the brothers of Peverelsthorpe ; and there remains 100 shillings ; and in payment of Robt. Phatoris 6s. 6d. It is difficult to understand this entry. If it had been only the brothers of Peverel, it would seem to refer to Meredith and Roger de Powis (William Peverel's half-brothers), who received an allowance out of his property about this time. (See the Pipe Roll of 17 Henry II.) But Peverelsthorpe was never a portion of William Peverel's Honor ; this was no doubt de Busli's fee at Domesday ; and in this reign Humphry de Busli is alleged to have held it, and it was the portion of his inheritance which Thomas de Bussey claimed in 9 Henry III. against Robert de Viteriponte. We now come to a remarkable series of entries of immense value to the genealogist in proof of the existence of a great THE PIPE ROLLS. 119 number of families who have not hitherto been mentioned. It is headed — THE AMERCEMENTS RECEIVED FOR THE KING'S FOREST The amounts collected are very large, ranging from 200 marcs paid by the Earl of Ferrars, to half a marc, the lowest fine exacted. As this was very shortly after the war, and the great Ranulf Glanville was the presiding judge, it was probably upon that account. The names are arranged in the Roll, generally, according to the amount. For convenience of reference, they are here arranged alphabetically : — Anesleia, Reginald, 100 marcs. Aincourt, John, 20. „ Roger, 10. Aisulphi, John fil, 20 ; see in Yorkshire. Arches, Gerbert, 10 ; do. in York- shire. Alvers, Robert, 40s. Aldred, Hugo, 20s. Afreton, vill de, 2 m. Buron, Roger, 10 m. Bussei, Hugo, 20 m. ; see in Lincolnshire. Bussei, Robert, 2. Bardolf, Hugo, 5 ra. Barret, Galf, 10 m. Belewe, Wm. de, 20. Baalega (Barley), Robt, 2. Burdon, Ralf de, 3m. Bidon, John, i m. ; see in Oxfordshire. Boskerville, John, 6 m. Blund, Wm., 2 m. Bullwell, Vill de, 20s. Calwatton, John de, 2 ra. Cromwell, Rad de, 10. Crokeston, Robt. de, 5. (? Curzon.) Creswell and Elm ton, 2 m. Eston, Robt, fil Walter, 6 m. Ernhala, Rich, de, 20. Fulcher, Henry fil, 40 ; Fulcher, his son, Flaburc, Nigel de, 10. Ferrars, Earl of, 200 m. Fenineglay, Roger, 5. Flanders, Roger, 2. (? of Cuckney.) Gresley, vill, 40s. Heddon, Engelram, 20s. Hetton, Gilbert, 2; Hubert, 2. Hoton, Rich., 10 m. Heriz, Robert, 5. Hugo, Ralf fil, 4. Holland, Swein, 4. Insula, Reginald de, 3. Langetot, Milo, 10 ; see in Oxford. Luvetot, Emma, 10. Wm. de, 60 m. Moretonia, Ada, 30 m. Meisnil, Robert, 10. Molbrai, Robert de, 4° J see in Northumberland. Mansfield, Soca de, 10 m. 120 THE PIPE ROLLS. Maresia, Rog fil Wm., 2m; see Roger fil Rann, Niger, Ralf de Sutton, 28s. Pincerna,Wni., of Hocreton, 2 m. Philip, Robt. fil, too m. Pleslea, Serlo, 60 m. Puher, Roger, 5 ra. Rann, Robert fil, 20. ,, Wm. fil, 100 m. (? de Alfreton.) ,, Roger fil, 100. (See Mareseia.) (? de Alfireton.) Richard, Simon fil, 40 m. (Pin- cerna.) Romeisin, et fil, 20s. Rippeley, villa, 2 m. Stradlega, Sanson, 10 m. Silvanus, Osbert, 20 m. Sumerville, Robt., 10 m. ; and his son, Sanson, Hugh, 10. Sutton, Hervy, and Robert, his knight, 5 ; Adam de, 2. Stokes, Stephen, 2 m. ,, Roger de, 5. ,, Jacob de, 2. Spondon, vill, 5, Sandebi, Wm., 4 m. Shatton, Robert Niger, 20. Stretton, Adam de, 2. Wulfirici, Mathew fil Wm., fil, 40s. (de Hathersage.) Walter, Robert fil, 4 m. Wandeslega, Rand., 3 m. Wudburg, Walter de, 20s. Warsop, vill de, 40s. It is remarkable how these amercements are levied. It cannot have been a scutage, because the amounts are not in any kind of proportion to the several estates of those fined ; and towns are fined at a merely nominal sum : Alfreton, for instance, at two marcs ; whilst the Lord of Alfreton, William fil Ralf, was fined 100, and his brother Roger an equal amount. Roger Buron was fined 10 marcs, and Reginald de Anersley 100 ; the two Deincourts at 10 and 20 each ; Hugo Bardolf, who now held the barony of Goisfred Ascelin, at 5 marcs; and William Pincerna, of Hocreton, at only 2. As it was not a question of property, it must have been one of conduct, and the only possible solution seems to be that the king wanted money, and fined his enemies. He received here over i^goo, an immense sum in those days. As some proof of the clannish character of these persons, here was the founder of Beauchief Abbey, his two sons and his brother, and about half of the lay witnesses to his foundation charter. But this is not the whole record of this bloody assize. The sheriff accounts for the goods of those who had fled the country, or had perished by the judgment (of the ordeal of water) at the Northamptonshire Assizes. Held before the king himself: Walter de Boney, 3s.; Adam de Rideslea, 4s. 6d. ; Turkil de Cneshala, 22s. 6d. ; Leofwin de THE PIPE ROLLS. 121 Wivelsthorpe, 6s. ; Tom de Bolton, 3s. ; Ulfkel fil Ase, 43s. sd. ; Rad fil Lune, los. 8d. ; Swen de Potlac, i8s. 6d. ; Fulk de Marcham, 26s. 6d. ; Gilbert Vie, 4 ; Robert fil Aveline, 16 ; Swen de la Kerneille, 60s. 8d. ; Ailwin Ruffo de Horseleg, 8s. lod. Hon. of Peverel accounted for;^2i9. Hugo de Belcap. Ralf fil Wm. fil Robert, £2$ for his relief for 5 knights' fees of his inheritance. Tichell, John, the constable (of Chester), ;^266 13s. 4d. Henry de Novomercato, £B.6. pipe IRo. 23—23 Denrp 11. Wm. fil Ralf, sheriff, who accounts for Ii2s. for Claworth ; from Wm. fil Robert fil Hugh, iios. for land which the king gave to Richard Masclo, his sergeant in Peverelsthorpe, In operations upon the Castle of Peak, ^49; overseers, Gervase Avenel, Warin fil Robert, and Robert de Hoppa. At Clifton, with the vivarium (fish-pond), £210 ; overseers, Thos. de London, Roger fil Wm., and Henry Wellebeuf In payment of Robt. de Vadis, Wm. de Passeis, and Richard de Pontearch, the king's sergeants, £() 9s. For 20 carretates of lead for the king's use at Woodstock, 10 m. ; and upon works at the gaol of Nottingham, 25s. 6d. ; overseers, Orm Propositus and Bartholomew ; Ralf fitz Stephen accounted for £20, de censu forest of Sherwood. William de Heriz, ;£"20 on account of his fine. Hamon de Taneslie and Orm de Taneslie, J m. ; Godric, id. PLEAS BY HUGO DE GUND AND HIS ASSOCIATES. Fines, etc. : Robert fil Ralf, i m. ; Robert de Hokerton, Emma de Luvetot, Jollan de Nevel sued Wm. de Heriz, Hugo de Heddon, Hamon de Masci, Simon fil Richard, owed 40 m. for a recognition (assize) concerning a knight's fee against Ralf de Albini, which was respited to Lincolnshire. 17 122 THE PIPE ROLLS. NEW PLEAS, HUGO DE GUND, WM. FIL RALF, AND WILL BASSET. Robert de Shipley, lOOs. for having assize concerning the inheritance of his wife. This is a very interesting entry. This Robert de Shipley was probably the ancestor of the Vavasors, who obtained this manor from Robert de Muscamp at a later date. Robert de Shipley, temp. Henry H., with the consent of Robert de Muscamp, his lord, granted a rent out of Shipley to Rufford. His wife was probably of the Muscamp family. They were allied to the Peytevins, of Yorkshire, and attested many of these deeds ; and through them to the de Birkins, who were also connected with the Peytevins, Robert de Peytevin, and Roger de Birkin, son of Adam and Maud de Cauz, having married the same lady, probably a Vavasor (tempe Richard). Robt. de Vavasor married the heiress of Tuxford, and her son afterwards enjoyed her inheritance. She is described as the Lady Olive Montebegon in the Rufford Chartulary, so that this marriage must have occurred after the reign of John. The sheriff was allowed for Richard Crasso half a marc ; of the gift of the king, 50s. , the Fridborg de Burton, ^ m. William fil R,oger, Turchel Palmer and his associates, by the pledge of Nuer; Henry de Bancwell and his associates, by the pledge of Levened. ROBERT DE ALBINI ACCOUNTED FOR FIVE MARCS FOR THE DUEL OF THE EARL OF FERRARS, With the following knights : — Robert and Henry, the earl's uncles, each 40s. Bee, ArnaJd de, 20s. „ Henry de, ^ m. Buron, Roger de, i m. Boscherville, Rad de, i : Bakepuz, Walter, i m. ,, John, 2. Curzon, Robt., 40s. ColviUe, Wm., i m. Gresley, Robert, 2 m. ,, Henry, ^ m. Herbert, John fitz, | m. Leke, Alan fil Harald, i m. Montgomery, Wm., 40s. Pirario, Wm., \ m. Pagan, Nic fitz, i m. Snelleston, Maurice, A m. Stanton, Robt. fil David, f m. Tickenhale, Alan, i m. Trusley, Robert, i m. Tuche, Heric de, 2 m. Sum ;^2o 6s. 8d. THE PIPE ROLLS. 123 The sheriff also accounted for 51s. 8d., the farm of Crophill, which was the land of Richard Pincerna for half a year. (We have seen that the previous year William Pincerna of Hocreton escapes for a small fine.) Robert Malbisse, Roger de Pomfret (brother of Thomas de Belfou), half a marc for a duel with Simon de Cathorpe ; Wm. de Meisnel J m. for a default, Hubert fitz Ralf 20 m. for having a writ concerning the lands of Wigot of Lincoln. This Wigot was a tenant of Robert Todeni, and possibly through Agnes de Rye Hubert fitz Ralf may have been entitled to his inheritance as an escheat ; nothing further is recorded of this matter. DMpe mo. 24.-24 Ibenrg ll. Sheriff, WiLLlAM FIL RALF, Serlo de Grendon (his son-in- law), for him. Henry Oil de Beuf (Wellbeuf) mentioned. Operations upon the Vivarium of Clipston ;^20, the chapel ;£^20, and house ^^6 6s. 8d. 6 caretates of lead sent for the king's use to Wudstock 43s. 46., and on works upon the chamber (camera) of the king at Not- tingham, and the park, j£iiS. Hugo fil Robert 20 m., Sanson de Stradley, Rad de Crumwell 5 m. for expediting (festinando) his writ of right against Will de Heriz. (This suit, instead of being hastened, hung about for many years.) The following year this entry is repeated, when it is stated that the king had the land, William being dead. For the goods of outlaws, etc., Ralf Carbonar 8s., Osbert de Eston 29s., William de Sudbia, Robert de Wittington 8s., John his son, Walter fil Emma los., Osbert Orwit. The Hon. of Peverel, Gilbert de Albemara for Foston, and Hugo de Belcap, ^8 for Ernebi and Beston. pipelflo. 25.-25 Ibenrg II. Wm. fil Ralf, sheriff; Serlo for him. Works at Clipston and Nottingham £6^, the park;£io 2s. 6d., the vivarium, etc., £126; overseers, Henry Leech, Reg de St. 124 THE PIPE ROLLS. Maria, Adam de Mortain, Wm. fil Walkelin ; and for horses and beasts (avibus) employed for the king's use by Hugo de St. Mauro ^4 15s. 3d. Repairs at the gaol at Nottingham 39s. 4d. For supplying (locandis) caretates (of lead), for carrying the same by boat (batoria) and other rafts (rettatos) from Nottingham to London 24s. And for masons (maisrenios) for building the king's house at Radford 20s. Thomas fil Bernard accounted for wastes, etc. NOVA PLACITA PER WM. BASSET and his associates. Fines : Henry de Denest ^ m., Peter de Briminton ijm., Engelram de Brampton |-. (This entry dates many Rufford Charters of great importance.) Paulin fil Xpian J m., Gilbert de Huccenel, Hugo de Osmantorp, Alex de Houkisword, Rich Barre for unjust disseizin Hugo de Stanton for having Assize on the death of his wife's father. Havis de Arches 5 m. for having a judgment concerning her dower. (The Arches family was of Grove ; Gerbert de Arches died about this time, for Gilbert his son paid 50 marks for his father's barony in 28 Henry II.) Rad Talbot sued Richard fil Erland. THE GOODS OF OUTLAWS, etc. Alan fil Wulswce for forest plea 21s. 6d., Robt. fil Wirtmera 6s. 8d., Wm. Luparii 7s. 6d., Wm. Faber 4s., Herbert de Bulwell 31s. 4d., Hereward de Wandesley 91s. Hacon de Wandesley 12s. 6d., Mathew de Soliston 14s. 6d., Rich fil Edwin 19s., Roger Venis Presbiter 7s., Andrew de Kilburn 2s. 4d., Ralf Juvenis (Cilt or Child) held Stanley, an outlaw, for the same, 8s. 2d. (It may be noted that Stanley was sold to the sheriff's son-in-law shortly after this period by Nicolas, brother of William Ciiild. This entry seems to show that the surname Cilt or Child was here properly translated by the scribe, but that it had already become a a surname indicating probably an English origin for the ancient family of Stanley.) Maurice and Hacon de Tibshelf 9s. THE PIPE ROLLS. 125 IPlpe IRo. 26.-26 Iftenrg II. William Fil Ralf, sheriff; Serlo de Grendon for him. For enclosing the park at Clipston ^^30 ; overseer, Wm. fil Walklin. (Henry II. granted the manor of Steynesby, belonging to Jocelyn de Steynesby, also called de Hardwick, the ancestor of the family of that name, to Wm. fil Walklin ; Charter still at Hardwick Hall. He is first mentioned the previous year.) In works about the king's chamber (camera) in the castle of Nottingham ;^20, and on the house for the king's beasts (aves) 2 IS. 6d., for making one appenticium and 12 great caldrons with tripod.'i, £4. OS. 7^d. 40 caretates of lead given by the king to the Cistercian monks 20 m., and for carrying the same from the Peak to St. Botulf's (Boston) loOs. ; for 100 caretates of lead for the works at the church of Walthamstowe ^^33 6s. 8d., and for carriage of the same from Peak to Boston, and for taking the same in ships to London, ^14 3s. 6d. ; for carrying the treasury from Newark to Doncaster 5s., by John Curson and William Maid ; and for carrying the treasury from Nottingham to Northampton, by Richard and Hu le Cleric, 4s. Robert fil Fulc owed 60s. for recreantisa. (This may mean only that he was absent ; but it may mean that he was so, from cowardice. Hence the reproach in the term " recreant knight") His pledges were William de Tuche and William de Weston. NEW PLEAS. John Foun and Herbert the forester loOs., Serlo de Plesley by the pledge of Nicolas de Barley, Turold father of Nicolas i m., Hardulf de Barley, Peter fil Nicolas, at Nottingham ; Jocelyn de Amundeville (see in Lincolnshire). By fines : Wm. Pullo i m., Wm. Picot, Rad de Warsop, Wm. de Marsei, Walter de Skeggbi, Alan Castellan his pledge, Wm. fil Drogo, Galf de Monast for license of concord with Wm. de Toke, Silvester de Sutton, Will fil Drogo, Robert de Rolleston. 126 THE PIPE ROLLS. PLEAS OF THE COURT. Robert Withand, Robert de Wicheton S m. for having a writ concerning a fee, the marriage portion of his wife, Margaret de Nottingham ; (Henry de Wichton and John attested a Walesby Charter of Wm. le Fremunt) ; Roger fil Wm., Hugo de Vasetin ; Robert de Heriz accounted for ;^iOO for having the land of William his brother, and Adeliza his widow owed lOO marcs that she should not be compelled to marry any one unless she had a mind to. (These gross exactions show that there was now much corruption in the administration of the law and in the dealing with estates by the Crown. Ralf Cromwell had been suing for this property for several years.) Robert fil Wm. de Godenoure (Codnor) half a knight's fee in Ratcliff. (This fee remained with the Greys as lords of Codnor, but it does not appear by what right they possessed it, possibly by marriage with the heiress. Nothing is known of this family. Warner held Codnor at Domesday under William Peverel.) Robt. fil Walter. THE HONOUR OF PEVEREL. William fil Ralf, sheriff, Serlo de Grendon for him accounts for £2ig for the farm of the County. The sheriff accounts for lOOs. for the lands of Robert de Heriz at Stapleford, and 68s. for the corn of the land of Gervase Avenel. Note. — This payment for the land of Robert Heriz of Staple- ford curiously commences with the date of the other Robert Heriz purchasing the lands held by his late brother. These two families must not be confounded. They were separate as early as the foundation of Lenton Priory, when they each granted land out of their domains. This Robert de Heriz seems to have been the last male heir of his family, although the de Ecclestons, who derived descent from his sister and co-heir, assumed the name of Heriz, and the estates continued in their family until the time of Edward II. pipe IRo. 27—27 Ibenrg II. Ralf Murdac, sheriff. For the gaol of Nottingham ;^io los. iid. ; overseers, Will de Wint and Orm Pistor, and also Brunus Burdon and Mansell THE PIPE ROLLS. 127 (Cambiatores), money-changers of the king ; and for the charge of taking the treasure from Nottingham to Northampton, and for shelves or hutches (forul), and other small business of the exchange, 21s. 2d. ; and for repairing the house of Margaret, which was injured when used for the exchange, los. And in operations upon the hall (aula) of the king at Nottingham by Peter and Mathew together ;^46 7s. 3d. In works upon the houses of the Brethren of Chartuse dwelling at Witham, ;£20 by the view of Elie de Maissi and Walkelin de Bradleya. Note. — The chronicle of Thomas de Musca, of Dale Abbey, which is remarkably accurate in many details, states that Serlo de Grendon, who married the daughter of William fitz Ralf, late deputy-sheriff, was Lord of Bradley. He must, therefore, probably have been a son of this Walkelin, and, as it is stated, though unfortunately without giving details, this family were illustrious by the eminence of his race. The probability is that they were of the house of Ferrars. HUGO GURNAY'S PLEAS. Emma de Lovetot owes ;£S 16s. 3d. for license to marry, but she is dead. Rad Cromwell owed S marcs for hastening the writ concerning Widmerpol against Robert de Heriz, but a note is added that as yet he had it not. This must not be confounded with the previous suit against William de Heriz, that having terminated by his death. This refers to Widmerpol only. Other suits were brought by the Cromwells during some 200 or 300 years, all of which failed, not that possibly the claim of the Cromwells of a descent from Aldene of the time of Domesday was invalid, but that they were barred by time. The history of these suits would be incomprehensible, so well established was the bar of lapse of time, were it not that too frequently the king violated the law for his especial favourites, and gave relief after a continuance of adverse possession. Hawise de Arches 20s. for having judgment of dower, but the lands were in the king's hands. Costo : Falconer (of Hucknal) was excused payment of 5s. The sheriff accounted for ;£'42 12s. lod., the rents of Wm. Luvitot's lands, and ;^27 1 8s. tod. for the farm of the same. 128 THE PIPE ROLLS. Simon fil Rich. £ij i6.s. 8d. for recog. of i fee v. Ralf de Albini. Philip de Wercer accounted for the Hon. of Peverel. Hubert fil Ralf accounted for £lQ for having a writ for the lands of Wigot. pipe mo. 28, r. 2.-28 Ibenrg II. Ralf MURDOCK, sheriff, accounts for ^£"276 15s. id. bl. for the farm of the counties, and for works upon the king's hall at Notting- ham, together £,%o ; supervisors, Henry Leche and Helie de St. Maria ; and £6 for iron at the works of the gaol, and in the repair of the Borough Gaol 7s. 7d. Ralf fil Stephen ;^20 de censu Foreste de Sherwoode. The fair of Chesterfield, 29s. NEW PLEAS. Fines: Adam de Sutton, Robert de Derleia, \ m. for not prose- cuting his claims ; and 3 marcs for William de Chaurc, Malger de Barnebi, Robt. de Battorp, Alan de Wapeton, Hugo de Leicester, Robt. Pavelli de Rutington, Odo de Bernolveston, Will fil Hervey, Robt. de Derby, Willo de Kelem, and Will de Rislea because Wm. fil Hervey did not prosecute his claim ; Serlo de Turlaveston, and Wm. fil Robert. Michael fil Jordan, Eustace de Broculestoua, Turpin de Tickhale, and Ralf his brother. John de Sceggebi x. m. for false claim. OF THE PLEAS OF THE COURT. Thom de Gilbert 5 m. for £i\ for his father's debt ; Hugo de Leicester, Norman de Adwaldton, suit for 30 a. land at Rudding- ton, against the nephew of William Hulme ; Robt. fil Gubert concord Gilbert de Aneslea, Gilbert de Valle v. Robert de Bussei, \ of I fee in Almeton and Mapelton and Bestorp; Gilbert fil Gerbert de Arches paid a fine of 50 marcs for his father's land, Havis his mother fined for her dower in 25 Henry II. Wills de Wille, Robt. de Salceio v. Rann fil Ralf in Normanton. THE PIPE ROLLS. 1 29 (This fee must have been in Normanton by Babworth, which Wm. de Grendon held of the Honour of Lancaster. Galfr de Salicosa Mara married the daughter of Wm. fil Ralf ) Robert fil Walter c. s. that the king should remit his anger against him on account of the flight of Adam Bolon, for whom he was bail. The Hon. of Peverel, land given to Wm. fil Robert de Peisse and Rad RufTo de Came. Sum of monies spent on the works on the hall of Notting- ham, ;£2i6 1 28. 8d. this year. Ipipe IR0. 29, r. 8—29 Ibenrg II. Rad Murdac, sheriff. Dunham, for which Will de Mandebi answered. NEW PLEAS. Alan de Uppeton, Rich fil Robert de Alwastesflea, Hugo de Leicester, Ad and Rich de Eston, Dunning, the man of Peter de Wudham ; Tom de Barlega, Almaric de Brumingeton, one marc for frankpledge of Walton for the flight of Gerv. Philip Aurefaber ; Wm. de Grenelega, Serlo de Turlaveston, Robt. de Rodeston, Robert fil Reginald, Simon fil Rich for goods of outlaws retained. Wallano fil Robert, Arnulf Franceis, Henry de Arches, Will fil Herbert, Alexr. fil Toke, Robert the Constable. The wife of Geoffry Constantine ;^4 8s. iid. for the money or cattle (pecunia) of her husband, for which she answered in Staffordshire 38s. ; Sewel, sergeant ; 30s. for the goods of Gladwin, who was hung for harbouring a thief ; Marie, an outlaw. Norman de St. Patric accounts for £1^ for the relief of 3 knights' fees. (These fees were at Nuttall, of the Honour of Peverel. Norman de Patrie gave 3 fees — Deresburc Blacolwesly and Raalund, — to Lenton Priory at its foundation, 2 Hy. L Gaufry St. Patric gave the church of Nuttall to Lenton, the heath about Bestwood and his other woods in Nottingham. Robt. St. Patric in 7 Rich. I., Norman in 9 Rich. I., and William St. Patric in 2 John, had a suit with the Priory of Lenton respecting his grandfather's gifts. This family appears to have held land of the de Alfretons, but the connecting link has not yet been discovered.) I30 THE PIPE ROLLS. ptpe mo. 30, r. 7.-30 Ibenrs H- Ralph Murdac, sheriff. In pardon by the writ of the king ; Walter, bishop of Lincoln, 30s., and the knights of Wm. fil Ralf Dapifer of Normandy, 30s. (This Walter de Constantine, who had just been appointed to Lincoln, was translated to the archbishopric of Rouen. He was a brother of Roger fitz Reinfred, the judge of Henry H.) The sheriff accounts for loos. the land of Robert de Heriz at Stapleford, and fy 12s. 6d. for the farm of Baselow. (This was Gervase Avenel's land, for which he paid 20 marcs in 2 Henry n., and which was in the king's hands in 26 Henry H. This afterwards came to Basset and Vernon.) And in re-stocking Stapleford, 12 oxen, 100 sheep, 9 cows, and I bull, ^4 i6s. The sheriff accounts for the rent of Totingwich 43s. WM. LUVITOT'S ESTATE. 40 cows and 4 bulls to replacing 11 cows £,% i6s., and 8 oxen 40s., and for 12 scrophis (pigs) and i (verre) boar 13s., i affrus (cart-horse), 2s. 6d. Wirchoppe : 10 cows and i bull 44s., 8 oxen 40s., 300 sheep ^12. Gringeley : 10 cows and i bull 44s., 8 oxen 40s., 100 sheep ;^4, 5 scrophis and I verre 6s. Sum £t^6 Ss. 4d. pipe IR0. 31, r. 8.-31 ibenrs II. Ralf Murdac, sheriff. And in payment of Humphrey de Bussei (Busli) for guarding the king's house at Clipston 66s., and Ranulf and Herbert for keeping the park there 4s. (This must be that Humfrey de Busli whose son or grandson, early in Henry HI., sued Robert Vipont for Peverelsthorpe.) THE PIPE ROLLS. 131 NEW PLEAS BY WILLIAM DE VER, ROGER FIL REINFRED, AND RIC DE PECCO. Arneburga fil Toke, Robert fil Roger, Wm. Messer, Robt. fil Wm. de Cotgrave p. Richard Villani, Robert Drake pi. for Malger his brother, and Robt. de Aslakeston, Robt. Noir p. Will de Lech, Yarald de Scotwic, Rad, man of Godwin, Roger fil Wm. owes one marc for (stulto dicto) false pleading ; Rad de Lincoln, Benedict Gernet, Robert de Sutton by the pledge of Godfrey. THE PLEAS OF THE FOREST BY GEOFFRY FIL PETER. Wm. fil Rich de Ernhale, Rich fil Gladwin, Rob de St. John, Henr Biset, Magister Vacarius, Andrew the Canon, Galfry the Canon, Magister Gilbert, Reginald de Anesley, owes ten shillings for an assart (ppsta) ; Wm. Presbiter de Flintham, Rich fil Wale, 20s. ; Roger fil Robert de Hickling, Gamel de Nottingham, Robert fil Walter de Sudwell, Roger de Buron, Robert fil Galfr de Not- tingham, Nicol de Sigello ; Robert, the miller of Wormhill. Robert de Normanton, Will fil Hugh de Etewell. Alured de Cumbrai, Uctred de Ludworth. OF THE OBLATIONS OF THE COURT. Havis de Arches accounts for 10 m. for having possession of her dower, and that she should not marry unless by the command (voluntas) of the king. (This lady has appeared before in the 26th of the king. Possibly, although this entry is rather dift"erent, it is but a repetition of the former. Frequently an entry appears for many years.) Richard fil Rich de Chaginea, concerning 12 bovates of land against the Abbot of Welbec. (This curious name must be a form of Chugeneia or perhaps Cahaines.) Alured de Suligni lO. m. because he had not the goods of Bald- win, for whom he was bail ; John de Builli S m. for unjust dessiezin. (This is an interesting suit, for it shows that the de Buslis were not yet established in their estates, although no doubt trying to 132 THE PIPE ROLLS. recover them. Robert de Veteriponte married the daughter of John de Busli ; and in 9 Henry VIII. Thomas, son of Humphrey, claimed Peverelsthorpe against him. This was probably the estate in dispute. Roger de Busli appears to have given it to the nuns of Haverholm, who exchanged it with Henry II. for land in Orston. How it came into the hands of Veteriponte, or in those of his father-in-law, does not appear.) The sheriff accounts for the goods of Richard de Derlega, an outlaw ; for Ake, hung ; Wulmer ;^4, 30s. for the land of Roger fil Rann for a year, 79s. id. for lands of Hasculf Musard, ;^47 6s. for the farm of his lands, and in Pevrel, etc. Ralf fil Hasculf ;£io ; £17 6s. for the land of Bingham, which was William Painels. pipe mo. 32, r. 5—32 Ibenrs n. Rad Murdac, sheriff Richard de Hoga lO m. for defraying the expenses of the Earl of Spain, for enclosing the court of Clipston 60s., by the view of Humfrey de Bussei and Tom de London ; for repairing the gaol of Nottingham 40s., by the view of Peter Belli and Will de Wint ; and for finding the carriage (careta) for taking the Charters of Aaron from Nottingham to Northampton 3s., and for carrying the monies of the Archbishop of York and of Aaron (which the king gave to John his son for going into Ireland) from Nottingham to Tutbury i8s., and in repairs of the castle of Nottingham ;,f7 IIS. 2d. Ralf fil Stephen ;£'20 de censu forest of Sherwood. THE PLEAS OF WILLIAM DE VER AND HIS ASSOCIATES IN DERBY. Fines : Richard de Boitorp ^ m., Henr fil Robert. NEW PLEAS. Henry de Bee and Avice his wife 40s. for disseizen. Gervase cleric de Clifton 2 m. for having the farm of Cundale. Henry fil Robert, Wm. fil Walkelin | m., Rad de Birestles. Joscelin de Euer, Hugo de Houiton, Godwin fil Sewi, Swain THE PIPE ROLLS. 1 33 fil Adwin, Robt. de Glapwell, Galf de Morton, Herbert de Alnton, Wills de Hulme ^140, because he replevied certain men who were taken on account of the death of certain of the king's servants near Peak ; operations on the castle of Not- tingham £16 3s. od., by the view of Henry Leche and Reginald, brother of Helie (de St. Maria). The sheriff accounts for £2;^ 13s. id. and one small piece (frustulo) of silver bl. and 1 1 sticks (cocliar plani opes ex arg pondis), 15s. of money, of Turston cleric of Southwell 6s. 8d. perquisites. 60s. 8d. of the farm of the land of Roger fil Ralf in his bailiwics ; ;£^iO 3s. id. for Hamon de Masci, and 23s. 3d. for perquisites ; the farm of Adam de Morton 70s. and 20s. i id. perquisites. 20s. the goods of Simon de la Landa, outlawed ; los. Nigel do, 255. 8d. for the farm of the land, which was Henry de Wulvelega's, whose heir is in the custody of the king. (This name would appear to be an early form of the name of Wolley or Woolley.) 1 3s. 7d. relief of William fil Richard le Cat. THE LAND OF HASCULF MUSARD. ;^6o the farm of the land by Rollin Justice, with the land of the sons of Walter de Eston. Johanna, the widow of Hasculf, 60s. in money on account of her dower in providing for her sons their servants, and for their clothes ;£'io ; and for feeding and clothing his daughters 43s. 4d. ; and for feeding and clothing the sons of Walter Eston, who are now in her custody. pipe IRo. 33, r. 12-33 Ibeitrg ii. Rad Murdac, sheriff. In operations upon the castle of Nottingham, and in raising the walls thereof, 64s. lod. NEW PLEAS OF THE FOREST BY G. FIL R Jacob de Hulme 40s. for an assart, Rich de Barton 4 m. for killing a stag (cerva), Samuel Presbiter de Blidsworth, Wm. 134 THE PIPE ROLLS. fil Richard, 20s. ; Gilbert de Broculstowe, Rad de Bull well, Walter, cleric of CoUingham, 4 marcs for taking a fallow deer ; Will de Farnfield, Thorn Bardolf, | m. an assart at Gedling ; Matthew Barun, Simon de Turri de Rodeston, Henry de Upton, Roger de Derby, a canon, 5 m., but he is dead ; Ralf de Mamefield (Mansfield) and Walter de Sutton 40s. for verdicts (viridi) taken in their bailiwic. Will de Muscamp 5 m., Alan de Pickering 40s., Robert de Meisnil lOOs. for relief for one knight's fee, of the Honour of Peverel. Fulc Sumeter owes 2 m. for having a writ of right of feeding horses (equibus) and their young (puUis ear) for 3 years on the lands of the Prior of Worksop. THE SCUTAGE OF KNIGHTS' FEES OF THOSE WHO DID NOT GO WITH THE KING'S ARMY INTO GALWAY. Roger de Buron ;£^io, the heirs of Hasculf Musard of old fees £12, of new 5 IS. 3d. ; the Hon. of Wm. Peverel ^60 and l6s., and Reg de Empingham 20s. The following were excused : — Peter de Goldington lOOs., Walter Bee 20s. Free tenants of the Honour of Wm. de Luvetot, of Hallam- shire, 20s. ; Wm. de Chaucis, 20s., accounted also, Henry de Stuteville iTiS, for fees divided between him and Hubert fitz Ralf And for breaking up the vivarium at Clipston 50s., and for carrying the fish from the same to another vivarium. The lands of Hamon de Masci ;,^I4, Adam de Morton £j 7s., and restocking the land which was Roger fil Rann's 33s. pipe IRo. 34, r. 14.-34 Ibenrs n. Rad Murdac, sheriff. And for the justices and doing justice this year, 7s. NEW PLEAS BY GODFR DE LUCI, JOSCEL, ARCH- DEACON OF CHESTER, AND WM. LE VAVASOR. Wimar de Turinton, Lawrence de Houkesworth, Arn de Sumton, Alexr de Gipeswiz (Ipswich), Hugh fil Aldred, Tecendis THE PIPE ROLLS. 135 de Kelum, Galf de Georz (Joez), because he made men abjure the realm without warrant ; Will Heldwin, Rad de Crumwell, Robt. de Birchwood, Wm. Malebisse, Rich. Propositus, Frank- pledge of Ralf fil Stephen, Ralf de Norton, Arthur de Neweton, Thomas Bardolf, Rich, de Solers, Will de Pec, Rich, fil Durand, Hugh de Durand, Hugh de Wudham, Will fitz Pain, Hugh fil Albelot, Walden fil Marine, Henry fil Wulfwine, Griffen, Swein, John de Westorp, Simon de Fonte, Hugo fil Snelling, Alice fil Robert de Leirton (Leverton), Swein Halida, Albreda fil Walter, Henry fil Gilbert, Uctred de Turnerdeston (Thurveldeston), Wills fil Sparri, Gilbt. de Esseburn, Rich, fil Ailulf, Hugo de Westorp, Hugo de Findon, Simon de Wilinton, Elias de Bradeston, Galfr and Gilbt. de Hargrave, Richard de Ekinton, Wills fil Ethekin, Roger fil Ralf Wereihund, Henry de Trusley, Nicol fil Walter, Warin de Hodsac, Will fil Nigel, Tom fil Turald de West, Arn Kide, Will fil Robert de Draicot, Wills Fabre ; Aaron fil Isaac owes 20s. for license of concord with Arnulf de Bee concerning a certain debt ; Robert Cut per false claim. GOODS OF OUTLAWS. Hugo Osmondeston, los. ; Rich, de Sexebi, los. 6d., and for payment of 2 watchers and i porter at Peak, £4 ; and for 100 caretates of lead which the king gave to the monks of Clares- well, for building their houses, £s^ 6s. 8d. ; and for guarding the carriage of the same lead from the Peak to the Humber, £g 13s. I id.; and for supplying two ships for guarding the same lead from the Humber to Rouen, £6 13s. 46. pipe mo. 35, rot. 9.-35 "Ibenrg ii. an5 I IRfcbarD i. Rad Murdac, sherifif. PLEAS BY THE BISHOP OF ELY AND OTHERS. Scarvdadale wapentake, 20s. for a murder, 29s. for the fair of Chesterfield. Wm. de Codington, Wm. fil Wulfari, Hugh Parmenter, Philip, Dean of Derby, p. Richard, Henry fil Robert de Duchmanton, J m. for unjustly vexing the Abbot of Welbec (Belebec); Alan de 136 THE PIPE ROLLS. Cattesden p. Simon, Alured de Derby, Rich, fil Walter p. Jordan, Reg. fil Tore, Richard fil Robert, Jacob fil Stephen, Wills Stoil, Ernald de Tilnea, Will fil Alured de Tilne, Gerard fil Veke, Sampson Senese de Newark. THERE ARE NO ROLLS FOR THE COUNTIES OF NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY FOR THE YEARS 2, 3, 4, AND 5 RICHARD I, NOR ARE THERE ANY CHANCELLOR'S ROLLS FOR THIS PERIOD. pipe IRo. 40, r. 6.-6 IRlcbarJ) I. Wm. Brewere sheriff for the half year. (Ralf MurdaC had been sheriff for the prior part of the year.) Lands given to Wm. fil Robert fil Hugh in Claworde, 56s. ; ^£■30 in Dunham (late the Earl of Flanders ?), for which Galf fil Peter (the chief justice) should answer ; Roger de Fontibus, loos. in Carlton ; Hugo de Neville, lOOs. in Ernhale (Arnold) ; £4. in Oswardebec, for which Hugh Bardolf should answer; Mansfield, which Norman de St. Patric and the heirs of Wm. fil Ralf hold for their land of Nutall, £S ; all these payments are for the half-year. For works in the stables of the castle of Nottingham, the pare, hall, and buttery, the high chamber, and the lunarior (upper story), and the windows of the hall, the postern, and mote, ^22 i6s. 6d. by the view of Elye the Parson and Wm. fil Baldwin ; Hacon Parcar owes 3^ marcs for keeping the park of Worksop badly ; Rad Murdac, ;^ii 14s. of the old farm of the lands of Hasculf Musard for the 3 years during which he had the custody of the same lands. FOR FINES MADE BY THE KNIGHTS AND MEN OF EARL JOHN. Rog. Maluvel and Rad de Wudburc, 20s. for having the king's benevolence ; Albreda fil Richard Pincerna, los. for having a writ for his goods v. Wm. Pincerna, and 5 m. for having an assize of new disseizin. THE PIPE ROLLS. 137 Roger de Lanum, ;^ioo for having the king's benevolence and his land and goods. 29s. for the fair of Chesterfield. Eustace de Morton, 20 m. for having his lands and for having the peace, because he was in the castle of Nottingham against the king. Hugo (Basset) de Heddon, ;^io for having his lands that is one knight's fee in Heddon. Sevval fil Henry, £$0 for having the daughters of Robert de Maisnil and their lands. Richard de Rishale, 30 m. for the king's benevolence. Ralf fil Stephen ^20 de censu of the forest of Nottingham. THE GOODS OF THE KING'S ENEMIES, SEIZED INTO THE KING'S HANDS IN THE COUNTY OF NOTTINGHAM BY THE HANDS OF THE SHERIFFS. 6s. John Crocun (Curson ?), 14s. for his goods sold, 4s. Robert Avenel, 12s. the goods of the same Robert sold, 12s. 6d. of the lands of Ralf Wellbeof, 36s. for his goods sold, i6s. 8d. for the lands of Wm. de Kelum, 34s. Galf Luttrel, 46s. 3d. the lands of Sanson de Strelly, los. for the land of Eustace de Moreton, 2s. 6d. for the lands of Wm. fil Maurice, i8d. for the lands of Walter de Pleslea, i8s. Peter de Vadis, 5s. Wm. de Chalmont, I OS. Richard de Cama, los. John Pincerna ; sum, ;£'li 19s. Qd. Also of the same in the Honour of Tichill : — 49s. 6d. lands of John de Uvetorp, 60s. for his goods, 67s. iid. the lands of Hugo de Staunton, 32s. the lands of Philip de Ulecote, i6s. lands of John de Thorp, 17s. Gilbert de Arches, 37s. 4d. the lands of Robert de St. Ouinten, ^11 9s. 2d. of the goods of the same, 22s. 8d. the goods of Ralf Cossardtorp, us. William de Hanfield. (This list contains the names of many of the first gentlemen of the two counties. It shows to what vile extremities to raise money John was stooping whilst Richard was in captivity. His father, as we have seen in the Roll for the year 32 of his reign, taught him to steal, giving him the moneys of a Jew and of an Archbishop. Now he was putting this lesson into practice on his own account.) 19 138 THE PIPE ROLLS. THE SCUTAGE OF THE KNIGHTS FOR THE REDEMPTION OF KING RICHARD. Roger de Buron,^io ; fees of Robert de Calz,^i2 los. ; fees of Rad Hanselin, ;^25 ; Rad Musard, £\2 ; Hubert fitz Ralf, £10. In pardon : Hubert himself, who was with the king in the army in Normandy, ;£20 ; Com de Ferrars, £6% los. ; the Hon. of Peverel, ^60 los. ; Roger Molbray's kts., 50s. ; Hon. de Gant, lOOs. ; Hon. de Richmond, 32s. ; Archbishop of York, 40s. ; SOS. the farm of Nuthale, half a year ; 253. for the same, one quarter ; £] 5s. the farm of Melburn. Sum, ^221 2s. od. HON. PEVEREL. ;£'232 and 12s. for the farm of the Hon. of Wm. Peverel for the whole year. Math de Clera ;^43 in Newbold and Bledworth, Costo Falconer £6 los. in Hugenot and Kirkeby and 2 mills, Hugo Belcap ;^8. ■ Wm. Briwere accounted for the sale of the provisions in the castle of Nottingham, £i\S 17s. 229 quarters of corn sold, £^1 los., with other corn, bacons, butter, cheeses, peas, and beans, and paid for thrashing and winnowing the corn. Will de Albini, ^^4 Ss. 4d. ; Oliver de Aincourt, 23s. ; . . Basset, for the farm of Basselow for half a year ; and 100s. from Richard de Vernon for the farm of the same Basselow ; the rents of Ruddington, which was the land of Robert de Pavelli. pipe mo. 41, r. 2 5.-7 IRtcbart) I. Will Briwere, sheriff, who accounted for ;^8 for the rent (cremento) of Chesterfield for this year, £6 13s. 3d. for Peak, £"] I OS. for Esseburn and for repairs at Peak and the gaol of Chesterfield, 10 m. by the view of Wm. fil Baldwin and Wm. fil Ralf ; the Brethren of the Lepers of Chesterfield, 60s. for £6 9s. which was assigned to them in exchange for their fair. (William Briwere evidently obtained a grant of the farm of Chesterfield this year. The sheriff's clerk had prepared his accounts for a payment on account of the fair as usual, but it was not filled up.) THE PIPE ROLLS. 139 Henry de Gray was excused payment of c. s. to the scutage for the redemption of the king because he was with the army in Normandy with the king. NEW PLEAS, G. FIL P. Fines, etc.: Wm. de Bellovage, Hugh Cleric, Roger Dias, Roger de Normanton, Thorn, brother of John p. Tom de San- dale, Will de Assebutere, Robt. de Pacringharn, Roger de Bernetota, David de Vico Mar. Robt. fil Dove, Rad Niger, Rad de Est Marcham, Robert fil Henry, Wm. fil Gilbert, Willo Blund, Rd. Septor, Roger fil Ailwin, Henry fil Tom, Robt. de Cniveton, Adam de Caldwell, Rich, de Burscota, Adam de Muscamp, Ailwyn de Sutton, Didicosa de Derby, Reginald fil Signi, Walkelin Presbiter, Galf Luvel, Emma fil Swein, Griffin le Tanner, Jord de Savigni, Adwin de Cendrer, Robt. de Befag, Galf fil Regin, Maur Palmer, Roger fil Robert, John fil Swein, Roger fil Edvie, Rich, fil Herbert, Peter fil Godfrey, Richard de Curri, Hugh le Bretun, Tom de Radelestan, Tom de Startorp, Rich. Gretword p. Basilie, Fulcher fil Ralf p. Hervei, Rad de Glap- well p. pi. Matilde, Rob de Pakington, Rich fil Hughlin p. Robert, Roger de Berchhasteda, Tom le Tinturer, Rich, fil Ralf, Robt. de Cniveton p. pi. Adam, Henry de Hotton p. pi. Havise, Robt. Furmentin. OF NEW PROMISES BEFORE HUBERT, ARCH- BISHOP OF CANTERBURY. John de Aincourt 50 m. for having the land of his wife in Nottingham and Derby, for which he ought to pay 25 marcs per annum ; Richard de Cama 5 m. for having full seizin of his wife's lands at Stapelford. (He had married Avice, sister and co-heir of Robert de Heriz of that place ; but this record states that he had been disseized for joining Earl John.) Nicolas de Daville 5 m. for having his land and his wife, of which he had been desseized for being in the castle of Notting- ham. Wm. de Toke paid 2 m. for the same cause, Rad de Wellbeof 3, Robert St. Quinten 10 m., William de Londen paid '10 m. for half a knight's fee and for certain land held in sergeantry in I40 THE PIPE ROLLS. Nettlesworth, Warechip, and Tineslawe (Tinsley) ; Wm. Pitie 20 m. because he was in the castle at Nottingham ; Humfrey de Tichhill 20 m. for the same. (This was probably Humphrey de Busli.) Galfr Torchard owed lOOs. for having a writ for 2 knights' fees in Hucknal and Lamcote against Wm. Pitie. (This ended by Henry, the son of Galfred, marrying the heiress of Pitie, and so uniting their claims.) John Buche 50 m. for having the king's mine of the Peak (de diniis) in Blackwell ; Beatrix de Halun 3 m. for having her dower out of the land of Peter de Sandiacre, her iirst husband. Sanson de Strelly paid 4 m. because he was with Earl John, Henry Mallore 3 m. for the same, Richard (or Robert) Malclere ;^33 6s. 8d. for the same, William de la Ward 10 m. for having writ concerning one knight's fee in Hartshorn against Bertram fitz William and Wm. de Tikehall p. pi Robert de Heriz and Reg Bass. Norman de St. Patric 3 m. for having seizin of his land at Nuttal, of which Earl John had disseized him. Matilde de Hokerton 3 m. for having the custody of her sons and their lands, John de Uvetorp lOOS. because he was with Earl John, Galf Luttrel 3 m. for 26 solidates of land in Nottingham and in Hucknal because he was with Earl John, Hunfr de Steinton 5 m. for land of the Honour of Tickill for the same cause (qy., was this de Busli .''), Richard del Lee i m. for 4 bov. in Chaward, Wm. Basset 40 m. for the whole of his land, Robert Avenel i m. for 7 shillings rent in Pleslie and in Sutton, Ralf (Robt) Coshart S m., for land in Cossard- torp, Peter Derby 40s., 4 bovates in Normanton, which he had of the gift of Hugo de Belcap ; Rametta, widow of Tom de Wurlington, 40s., 20 solidates of land in Horsdel, Retford, and Etton ; Oliver de Wellbeof 4 m. for land in Nor- manton and Osington, Hugh de Sandeby 20 m. for 8 librates of land, which was his father's, in Marcham, Sandebi, Burton, Bokingham, Ausretton, Babewurde, Wellum, Warshop, Wudham, Gresbock, Quicknea, and Tickhill ; John Wascelin, 2 m. (All these for having been with Earl John. Many of them had been wrongfully disseized by him, in fact, for adhering to King Richard, and even that clement sovereign restored them to his favour only upon payment of these large sums of money.) THE PIPE ROLLS. I41 GOODS OF OUTLAWS. Herbert de Bunteshall and Tirice de Normanton. Hubert fitz Ralf accounted for 40 m. for license to remain in England, away from the army in Normandy, and for his scutage ; Hugo de Stanton ;^20 for having the proper share of his wife's land, which was Hugo de Pleslie's. Will fil Robert de Essibi _;^I5 relief for 3 knights' fees ; £,22. goods of Ralf Wellbeof because he was with Earl John. Idonea de Vuerton 20 m. for having custody of her son, with his land ; Henry de Seckville 20 m. for having the land of Gilb Albemara, his uncle ; Jordan de Tuke i m. that it might be inscribed on the great Roll that the king commanded the Archbishop of Cantuar that Jordan de Tuke had concord with the Earl of Chester and his mother for the land (de Insula), concerning which there was suit between them, and that Jordan concedes to them the half which was near the South (Su), and the other he retains. pipe mo. 42, r. 22.-8 1Ricbar6 I. William Briwere, sheriff, who accounts for £j 17s. 3d., the remainder of the rents of Chesterfield, etc., for the past year, and for £■>,% of the rent of Chesterfield assessed by himself, the sheriff, and by Wm. Albini and Simon de Pateshill, by a jury of the knights of the county. (This appears to have done under the new regulations of Archbishop Walter.) FOR THE SCUTAGE FOR THE REDEMPTION OF THE KING. 55s. 5d. for the fees of Roger de Buron, 70s. for the fees of Ralf Musard, £6 7s. Robert Fretel, for half a year, and ;^24 8s. 3d. for the scutage of Peverel. THE PLEAS OF GALFRY FIL PETER. Fines : 3s. 4d. Roger de Normanton, 20d. Tom, brother of John, pledge, Tom de Sandal ; 4od. Ralf de Estmarcham, 40d. William fil Gilbert, 4od. Rich de Sapcote, 3s. 4d. Roger fil Adwin, \ m. Hy fil Thorn, 2od. Robt de Curneton, Will de Bellofago 40d. for 142 THE PIPE ROLLS. wine sold contrary to the Assize ; Hugli Cleric, David de Vice, St. Martin, Roger Derniz, the same. Nicola de Burton 40 m. for having custody of the land and heir of William de Burton. William de Cauces 10 m. for license to remain in England whilst the army was in Normandy for the redemption of the king, who was in Germany ; Wm. Duredent 30 m.. Will de London 10 m. for having his land de la Haia and the Pare. Theobald fil Theobald 40s. for having a writ to recover .£'13. Bertram de Chalvedon 40s., Herbert fil Richard ;£S4 19s. /d. for assize broken, for which he should answer in Yorkshire. NEW PLEAS BY THEOBALD DE VALENTIA AND MAGISTER ARISTOTLE. Tom de la Riverre, Alfric cleric de Marcham, Reginald de Eicring, John Boisfine, Rann de Kirkton. OF THE SECOND SCUTAGE FOR THE ARMY OF NORMANDY ASSESSED THE PREVIOUS YEAR. Roger de Buron, ^10 ; Hugh Bardolf, ^2^ for the fees of Ralf Hanselin ; Ralf Musard, i^i2 ; Will de Chaucis, 20s. ; Hon. Peverel, ^60 los. ; Henry de Grey, lOOs. ; Roger de Molbray, 50s. ; Com de Ferrar, ^68 los. ; Hon. de Gant, lOOs. ; William de StuteviUe excused because he had the custody of the Honour; Honour of Richmond, 32s. ; Archbishop of York, 20s. The following were excused payment: Hubert fit Ralf, Hugh Bard, Oliver de Aincourt, Roger de Mortain, Henry de StuteviUe. pipe IRo. 43, r. 10.-9 IRicbarb I. Will Briwere, sheriff". Will fil Galfry held Melburn. In lands given to Oliver de Aincourt. Oliver Wellbeof 50s., in the lands of Normanton and Oscinton. FOR THE THIRD SCUTAGE. ^10 Roger de Buron, Ralf fil Stephen ;^I2 for the fees of Robert de Calz, Ralf Musard ;^I2, Will de Chaucis 20s. THE PIPE ROLLS. 143 The following were excused by the king's writ : Hubert fil Ralf, Com de Ferrars, Wm. de Molbray, Will de Stuteville, Com de Cestre. Robert de Vipont accounts for ;^2o and loos. for the farm of the Hon. of Tichill. Robert de Vipont, £i, for the farm of Sterap and Ulecotes, which was Arnold de Deist's. TAILIAGE IN NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY BY WM. BRIWERE, SIMON BASSET, AND WM. DE RED- WARE. William de Kingsman, 3s. ; Snotington, 3s. ; Nottingham Bridge, £26 19s. For the foreign soc of Chesterfield, 2 m. NEW PLEAS. Robt. fil Maunuri, Rich, fil Nicol, Will de Acoure, Philip de Waleton, Hugh de Wenefield, Norman fil Roger. Robert Vipont, £/\ 2s. 6d. for the tailiage of Tickhill, 40s. for the soke of Tichill, received by Robt. Fretsel in the High Peak ; Philip de Strelley, 40s. for the mill of Burg. Tickhill is in default for destruction of houses in the war with Earl John. Morton, 6s. 6d. Wm. Clarel in Tickill. William de Handweit, of Grave. Stradley, which was Arnold de Heldelcrewe, Henry, his brother, Arnold de Deist. NEW OFFERINGS. Robert de Bevell, 20s. for land taken by Earl John ; Hugh de Redmareswerc, i ni. for 7 bovates of land in Briminton, against Peter de Briminton ; John de Saltucampoli (Sacheverel), 40s. for half a knights fee in Bubenden v. Oliver fil Nigel, concerning the inheritance of their wives, who were the sisters and co-heirs of Ralf fil Ercald : (by fine made between them Oliver had Bubingdon, Langford, Malmerton, Turnadeston, Woodhouse, Adelakeston, Stanton, Calewic, Prestmur; whilst John Sacheverel took Norwod, Chedel, 8 bovates in Adelateston, Chauness, Rumesoura, and Hopewell in Derbyshire). 144 THE PIPE ROLLS. Magister William Testard paid 300 marcs for having his Archdeaconry ; Eustace de Morton lOOs. for the Honour of Peverel ; Hugo Bardolf £,2^ for the scutage of the barony, which was Doun Bardolf's ; Robt. de Heriz £,6 for the same, and for the scutage of 4 knights' fees of the Honour of Peverel, and I fee of the Honour of Paveilli ; Adam de Bedingfield, 20s. ; Richard de Stapelford, i knight's fee ; Robert fil Pagan, i knight's fee in Tickhill ; Norman de St. Patric, 6 marcs ; Alex fil Toke, 3 m. ; Robert de Vipont, ^^ os. 4d. for the farm of Sterap and Ulcotes, which was Arnold de Deist's, and 65s. lod. for the farm of Duningby. ROBERT DE VIPONT FOR THE KNIGHTS OF THE HONOUR OF TICKILL. ^60 153. Alexr. fil Toke 20s., John de Builli ;^6, William fil Walkeline ^d, los., Roger de Lacy £,Z, Gerald de Furnival 1053., Roger de Luvitot lOOs., Hugh de Pusat 30s., Arnold de Deist, los. pipe mo. 44, r. 8—10 TRfcbarO i. Wm. Briwere, sheriff. Allowances : The Earl John jQ'^0 in Dunham. The Brethren of the Lepers' Hospital at Chesterfield ^6, which was assigned to them in exchange for their fair, and Earl John 70s. 4d. in Walkeringham, ;^I3 in Oskinton ; WiUiam de St. Mary Ecclesia, £6 los. Simon fil Richard owed 5 m. that he might restore to Henry his father's lands, which he wished to detain on account of his sister. William Albini owes 133. for the Manor of Oskinton. OF THE PLEAS OF GALF FIL PETER, WILLIAM DE BRIWERE, AND OTHERS. The sheriff accounted for \ m. from Robt. de Belfou for disseizin, and for 5s. 8d. for Hugh le Bretun, who withdrew from his suit. Regin de Colwic gave 5 m. for a fine for his land, and for having his serjeantry. THE PIPE ROLLS. 145 THE HON. OF PEVEREL. Hugo de Insula 60s. for all his fees, as the sheriff declares Galf de Sacville 20s., and owes ^^30 lis. 8d. ; Sewell fil Henry, Saher de Espelt ; Will Lacel owes Sos. for his farm. NEW OFFERINGS. Peter de St. Diacre (Sandiacre), ^100 for having seizin of Horsley, which he states is his inheritance, for 6 knights' fees. Ivo de Heriz 40 m. for having the land which was Robert de Heriz's, his father, of the fee of Wm. Peverel, which was seized into the king's hands at his death. Will Briwere was pledge for the said Robert. Alice de Ver, widow of John de Chester, 30 m. for permission not to marry unless she willed, and to marry if she wished it : this by the king's council. Norman St. Patric a fine of j^is for her fees. Sampson de Strelly for having seizin of his father's lands which were seized because he was with Earl John. Robert le Vavasor 40 m. for the custody of the land and heir of Robert de Furnival, and for having his marriage. Robert fil Richard ;£^lOO for his land seized by the king, and £2$ for other land. Wm. de London 50 m. for 12 librates, of which he was disseized byJ^Earl John. Juetta, widow of Simon fil Richard, 20s. for having a writ of dower against Ralf, his son. Thomas de Willeton and Rametta, his wife, fined for i fee in Panton and in Etton ; 3 bovates less J of i, Matilde de Mules' land at Serlebi, Doun Bardolf, 500 marcs for a fine for his father's lands. pipe mo. 45, r. 15— I 5obn. Wm. Briwere, sheriff, accounts for ;^279 Ss. iid. bl„ and ;^40 los. for the farm of the two counties, com. John £s° in Durham. William Albini, £26 bl. in Oskinton, 14s. de albo ; Peter de Derbi, 6s.; Wm. fil Galfry held Chelardeston for 21s. 3d., ^^38 146 THE PIPE ROLLS. for the rent (cremento) of Chesterfield, as per Roll 8 ; Will de Hulmo, as in Roll 9, by the hand of Richard de Trowell, Hugh de Lamcote, Isabella Haccon, Robert de Auvers, Tom de Rolleston, Stephen de Turnham. THE SCUTAGE ASSESSED FOR THE CORONATION OF THE LORD KING JOHN AT TWO MARCS. (This scutage was the first illegality of this king.) The Sheriff accounts for ;£^8o and i m. for the honour of Peverel. Will de Ferrars, 7 m. in Fetcham ; John de Monte Acuto, 2 m. ; Hugo de Insula, 6 m. ; Richard de Vernon, 3 m. ; Eustace de Morton, 6 m. ; Henry de Grey, 12 m. ; Ivo Heriz, for Killamersh, 3 m. ; Wm. St. Patric, for Deresburc, 7 m. Wm. fil Aio, Philip de Wilton, Hugh de Winefield, Norman fil Roger, Galf de Wudburc. Wm. Brewere, ^15 13s. 46., of the remainder of the farm as in No. 8 (Chesterfield). Robert de Vipont, 28s., and £4 2s. 6d. for the Hon. of Tichill. The same William Brewere ;^232 12s. for the farm of the said Honour in Bolsover, and £1$ 13s. 4d. arrears for the Hon. of Peverel. The monks of Basingwerc, ;^io in Langenedal ; monks of Gerolden, los. in Cortinstoc ; Costo Falconer, £6 los. in Huggendenedal (Hucnal) and in Kirkbi, and in 2 mills ; Hugo de Belcap, ;^8 in Ernebi, ;£i4 in Beston ; Eustace de Moreton, 39s. 4d. ; Simon Basset, i^io in Basselawe, and in payment of 2 watchers, i porter, at Peak, £^4. Philip de Strelly, £^4 for the mill of Burg ; William Briwere, ;^8 8s. for Foscinton ; Earl John, ;£2i los. in Newbolt and Blidworth ; Ralf Gernon, £^7 in Bancwell ; Gerard de Rhodes, £2^ 5s. in Clifton and Langare; and Com de Bar, lOOs. 9d. in Bolsover ; Wm. de Lacell ; all these for the half-year. NEW PLEAS. Robt. de Muscamp, 3 m., for a small increase of his park from the plain, Hubert and Roger de Wirke, and Osbert and Robert de Trowell. THE PIPE ROLLS. 147 NEW OFFERINGS. Sewell fil Henry, 100 m. and i dextria and i palfry, which Com G. ought to have received for the marriage of his sister Isabelle to Sewell, his nephew (nepos). Robert le Salvage owes 100 m. and i palf for having the daughter of William fil Wacheline, for which he should account in Sussex. The Prior of Lenton 3 m. for having inquisition concerning the demesne of William de Hulme, in Nottingham. Ranulf de Maresi 50 m, for having his land, which was in the king's hands since the death of his father. Ysolt, the widow of Philip de Derbi, 20 m. for the custody of her children, etc. ; and the said Isolda released the whole of her lord's money, if there was any, in the abbey of Gerolden and in the abbey of Verlega. Henry de Brailsford 50 m. by the pledge of Hugo, his son (erased). Galf de Luterel 15 m. for 43 solidates of land, and 86. in Clifton. Henry de Brailsford, Adam de Edensor, Robert de Sacheverel, David de Calvour, Nicol de Cavelunt, Eutropius de Brailsford, Maurice Hastings, Adam de Offeton, Will de Derebi, Adam de Tappeton, Robt. Calestor, the bail of Hugo de Brailsford, paid 150 m., because they did not produce him for whom they were bail. John Buche owes 30 marcs for having the mines of the Peak in the wapentake of Bancwell ; Hugo de Sandeby 20 m. for his land of Sandeby. FOR THE FIRST SCUTAGE. Peter de Sandeacre, 20 m. for the fees of Roger de Buron ; William de Chauces, Doun Bardolf, Ralf fil Stephen, Rad Musard, Galfr Luvel ; Henry de Hottot also accounted. pipe IRo. 46, r. 1—2 5obn. Will Briwere, sheriff for half a year ; HUGO Bardolf for the last half Allowed for operations at the castle of Harston by the view of 148 THE PIPE ROLLS. Wm. de Grendon (cleric), Samps de Stradley, Rad de Wellbeuf, and Peter fil William. For enclosing the park at Bolsover £z^ by the view of Galf Lutrel and Wm. fil Wachel. Robert fil Hereward. ARREARS FOR THE SECOND SCUTAGE OF KING RICHARD. Wm. de St. Marie Ecclesia, 20s. id. ; Com William de Derby, i. Newbold and Bledworth ; Rad Gernun, £7 in Bancwell ; Wenuwin Walensis (Peverel), £,6 los. in Eisford ; Wm. de St. Michael, £6 7s. in Lenton and Lindiby ; John de Saltucampoli, Robert fil Roger de Tikhill, 126 m. ; Roger, constable ot Chester, 16 m. ; Gerard de Furnival, John de Buille, Hugh de Stanton, Philip de Ulecotes, Robert Maluvel, Eustace de Vesci, Tom de Werington. AMERCIAMENTS BY HUGH BARD AND MAGISTER ROGER ARUNDEL. Wm. fil Lumene i m.. Rich. Yap los., Ban Vintner, Rad Teler, Susan de Chesterfield, Simon le Gluten, Hugh de Lambecotes, Wm. de Hindeston, Peter le Bel, Will.de Bligh, Robert fil Ran de Stirap, Rich, de Lutrington, Robert de Steinwet, Roger fil Alan de Bligh, Edwin fil Edw, Richard fil Godfrey, Hug de Hotot, Rad de Luvitot, Wm. fil Galfry de Colston, Wm. nepos Rad, Walter fil Hugo and Hug fil Hubert, Roger fil Galfry, Hilde de Whitelai, Innocens (clic), Tom fil Simon, Robert, brother Sacerdotis, Roger fil Walter the merchant, Osbert fil Reginald de Sulkeshola, William and Thos. de Worksop, Roger Haspald, Roger de Caleston, Galfry fil Rann, Ingelram de Screveton, Roger, brother of Wm. de Caleston, Wm. de Barbesle, Henry the Serjeant, Andrew de Lisures, Teobald de Notingham, Ralf fil Walter and William Ruffus, Walter Merce, William, brother of Goscelin, Tom de Vuerdon, Henry de Bergervill, Ric fil Matilde, Gamel de Gaton, Hugo fil Herbert de Obton (Osberton), Walter de Ravenebi, Simon fil Bernard, Hugo fil Godwin, Gilb., the man of the parson of Thoresword, Innocens (clericus), Robert, brother of the priest of Bekingham, Tom de Sandale, Robert fil de Ulecotes, Rad de Misterton, Elias and Mathew Matilde, THE PIPE ROLLS. 149 . Robt. Chascecapel, Elias Keldoc, Will Westrensis, Walter Doisnil, Galf fil Godr, Ralf Taillefer, Walter fil Gamel, Will fil Roger, Robt. Farenton, Henry Putrel, Roger Godberd, Hugh fil Roger de Chesterfield, Rad fil Gilbert de Blie, Robert le Barre de Bligh, Roger de Hickling, Will Spickfat, Alured de Turicton, Roger de Alneto, Robert fil Walter de Lamcotes, Will Sensin. fincB mabe before tbe Iking. Gilbert de Stokes and the vill of Stokes 7 m. for keeping the Bestrai (hawks) of the king when he came into the forest. Eustace de Moreton and the vill of Eyam 15 m. Robert de Middleton and the vill of -Middleton 5 m. Dna de Calvour and the vill of Calvoure 3 m. and the vill of Rallaund 3 m. and the vill of Hassop - 3 m. Ketel and Osbert de Langdon - - 2 m. John, brother of the same Osbert i Robert fil Alexr. de Morteshall ^ Matthew fil Dna de Morteshall - |- John de Feral and vill of Moneyash- lOOs. J vill of Abeneia, Robert the miller loOs., Eustace de Mortain 2 m., Gerebert de Stokes lOOs., Richard fil Wm. 20 m. for having an inquest by the knights whether he had forfeited in the forest or not. Hubert fitz Ralf 30 m. for having his wood without the forest as he had it in the time of Earl John, and 30 marcs for having his manor of Crich free from all forest exactions, and for having his hounds (hunting) in the woods of the same manor, and that such woods should not be in the forest. Robert de Somerville 15 m. for having his hounds for chasing the hare and the wolf as he had in the time of Earl John. Elias fil Elie 40s. for having 4 bovates of land in Cornhill, which he had cultivated from the wastes. Will fil Wachel accounted for 60 m. for having his hounds for following the hare and the wolf, both for murilegum, and for gain for Nottingham and Derbyshire, and for having the confirmation of the king in respect thereof ; and that his woods should not be afforested, as King Richard disafforested them I50 THE PIPE ROLLS. but did not confirm it ; and for having the confirmation of the king for his land at Steynesby, which he had by the Charter of King Henry. (NOTE. — This must be an old account, for in the previous year Robert le Sauvage fined for marrying his daughter. The Charter of King Henry's, as well as King John's confirmation of it, are still at Hardwick Hall.) Ivo de Heriz accounted for ID marcs for the confirmation by the king of the charter which the king gave him whilst Earl of Morton, that he might have hunting and venison (venat et venatione), and other his liberties in his woods and lands at Wingfield. Peter de Brimington accounted for ;^iOO to obtain the con- firmation of the king of his manor of Witenton and soke, for which he was accustomed to pay the king £"] 13s. The Burgesses of Derby £6^ for having the confirmation of the king of their liberties. Lisiars de Musters 40s. for having seizin of 12 bovates of land, 2 quarters in Leirton, and I toft, as it was lawfully adjudicated in the court of the king (whilst Earl of Morton), and of which he was disseized by the bailiffs of the earl without judgment, of which Roger de Capella disseized him. Beatrice, the widow of Theobald, 10 m. for having in peace the mint (domo monetaria) at Nottingham, paying half a marc annually to the king. Rich de Sutton 25 m. for having his land in peace, which he held of the Countess of Britain against Alexander de Pameter. Magister Alan de Bolsover 30 m. for confirmation of his charters. Robert de Campell 20 m. for an inquisition of the vicinity of Kilburn, whither he was disseized by King Richard, brother of the king, of half a carucate of land in the same town. Galfr Camara owed 60 m. and i palfry for a forest forfeiture, which was claimed from another Galf Camara in Wiltshire (through a mistake), as the writ of G. fil Peter proved, which the Marescal had. Ralf Gernon 50 m. for Bancwell, which the king gave him for the services of one knight's fee. Nicola, widow of Robert de Buron, paid 2 m. for having seizin of I carucate of land in Eston and in Offreton, of which she was disseized because the Earl of Chester gave her in marriage THE PIPE ROLLS. 151 (maritavit ea) without the assent of the king when she was within his gift. Adam de Bedingfield 50 m. for having seizin of half a knight's fee in Rampton and | in Bedingfield, of which he had been disseized. Juliana fil Hervei i m. for 3 bovates of land in Sutton, which Alexander de Paunton should warrant William Chauces lOOs. for having peace for not going abroad. Matthew fil Wm. ;£'20 for having his goods, of which Hamon de Masci and the knights of the Earl of Chester robbed him, for which Alexander de Paunton ought to respond. Robert Maluvel 40s. that he should not be compelled to plead with Adam and Gundred his wife, concerning 7 bovates of land in Ramton. Herbert de Ticinton 20 m. for having the manor of Bancwell to farm for ;^iO, and if he would have the charter of the king in confirmation he owed another ;£'io. He should not be summoned because he neither had it nor should have it. Richard fil Wm. de Pecco 20 m. for having the manor of Esse to farm for £16, and if he would have a charter he must be summoned for that purpose. (The villainy of some of these transactions is quite apparent. Herbert de Ticinton was bargaining for what Ralf Gernon had just been charged 50 m. ; and Richard Pec having paid 20 m. for his lease, was now told that if he wanted a legal assurance for it he must pay over again. Many persons paid fines to confirm what the king him- self, whilst Earl of Morton, had previously taken money for granting.) Richard de Buron, nephew (nepos) of Henry fil Godfr, S m. for having a writ of mort ancestor of Henry, his uncle (avunculus), against Johanna, widow of Henry. Walter Malet 20 m. for assize of mort ancestor of 10 knights' fees in Oscinton, Horsley, and Cotgrave, against the knights Hospitallers of Jerusalem, Peter de Sandiacre, and Robert de Buron. Philip de Ulecotes ;^iOO and i dextria for having to wife Johanna, the sister of Sewell fil Henry. 152 THE PIPE ROLLS. Ipipe IRo. 47, r. 8-3 5obn. Hugh Bardolf ; Will de Leche for him. For the queen and her family in necessaries whilst they delayed at Nottingham, ;£'lO by the view of Robt de Vetepont and Alex Clic. Wm. Bassett paid 65 m. for 10 librates of land, of which he was disseized. Hugh de Windekers i m. ; Roger Haspard, Robt. fil Walter de Labricotes, Roger de Hickling, Brian Vintor, Wm. fil Lumene, Robert Villers, for having record as already recorded, 2 m. ; Philip de Ulecotes ;£30 and i dextria for having Johanna. NEW OBLATIONS. Philip de Stradlega 10 m. and 1 palfry for having the daughter of Avicia to wife, with her inheritance. Peter fil William owes 60 m. for having the king's benevolence. David de Calvere 20s. for having a writ concerning ^ a knight's fee in Watenho against William fil Robert. William de Cressi 20 m. and I palfry that he should enjoy the land and dower which, according to the custom (courtesy) of England, Cecilia, daughter of Gervase de Clifton, claimed against him. Nicola Salsari accounts for 10 m. and i courser (chasair) con- cerning 8 bovates of land in Aneston and 4 in Dunington kept in the king's hands, and 7 bovates of land in Lindric. William de St. Patric, to have an assize to enquire if Galfry de St. Patric, gave the church of Nuttall to the Priory of Lenton. William Pincerna owes 5 m. and i palfry for a relief of his lands, which he should hold of the king, and for having seizin of the land which was taken into the king's hands by writ. Cecilia, widow of Roger Cressi, 40 m. and 1 palfry for having her reasonable dower out of the free tenement of the said Roger in Nottingham, and for having a reasonable share of the chattels of the said Roger, and that she should not be compelled to marry. Robert de Steinweit loos. for one fee in Stanton. THE PIPE ROLLS. 153 Malger de Semdal 40s. for half a fee in Semdal. Will fil Baldwin i m. for having a writ against Theobald fil Theobald (monetor of Nottingham) for 7 m. Oliver de Wellbeof 40s. for 50 solidates of land in Normanton and Osmanton. Elias the Dean c. m. for having his (arnica sua, qy. amita, aunt), and his children and servants with pledges (plevina), so that they would be quit (stare recto) in the king's court concerning those things which pertain to the court of the king. ®f fines anb Scutage of IknlQbts' ifeee. John de Aincourt Ranulf de Newmarch Will fil Wachel Will de Chaucis Pavia de Ranton Ralf de Gresley Walter de la Haie Galf de Pavelli - Eustace de Mortein Wm. fil Robert - Wm. de St. Patric Rad fil Stephen Peter de St. Diacre Robert de Muscamp Hugo Shireton Robert fil Rich Yvo de Heriz Simon Basset Rich, de Vernon Nigel de Luvitot Hugh de Sandebi Rog Monach Rog Bevercote Robt de St. Quinton Hugh de Stanton Rad Selvein Willo de Nevil - Robt fil Pagan 21 5 m. for I fee. c. s. 4 m. I 10 m. I 20s. 12 m. 4 I m. i of I 10 m. and I palf 15 m. 5 30 m. 5 10 m. 3 30 m. 13 and ^ c. s. 4 10 m. ne transfere 4 m. I fee. 5 m. 2 10 m. 5 6 m. li 6 m. li 50 m. IS 8 m. 2 4 m. I 4 m. I 1 8s. i of I 40s. I 4 m. I 20s. 1 40s, I 154 THE PIPE ROLLS. Will de London i m. i Will de Schelton 4 m. Robert le Vavasor 5 ni. and i palf., p. passage R. de Furnel. Robert Brito 1- s. Com de Ferrars ;£9i 6s. 8d. Nich Ebor (The sums are given to show how irregularly these fines were assessed.) These are excused payment by writ : — Doun Bardolf, Hubert fil Ralf,Wm. de Stuteville, Com Briton, Wm. de Molbrai because he has quittance in Lancaster. These excuses seem to show that it was a tax on all, and not on those merely who were not with the army. This, no doubt, was one of the illegal scutages which led, more than anything else, to the rebellion in this reign. Henry Bardolf owes 30 m. for having her to wife who was the wife of Philip de Derebi. Lisiardus the Canon owes £,/^ for disseizin. pipe IR0. 48, r. 14—4 3obn. Hugh Bardolf, sheriff. — Wm. de Leche for him. Hugh Bardolf accounts for 17s. 6d. for the scutage for the payment of William de Luvetot. AMERCIAMENTS BY G. FIL PETER AND H. BARD. Theobald de Draicot \ m., Adam de Hayton, Robert fil Malger, Gilbert de Arches, Will Garet, Adam Galichli, Gilbert de Arches, Yvo de Heriz, Ingeriht de Stanton, Peter de Leges, Ysolde de Bredon, Joh fil Robert, Richard fil Heward, Walter fil Molle, Wm. Pirot, Richard Parson de Egton, William fil Malger, Henr Paste, Roger de Lanum, Godfrey fil Alex., Rich Propositus de Scrobi, Reginald Bulecote, Bartholomew de Staftword, Roger Propositus de Euton, Will de Claw, Hubert de Sutton, William fil Brauneis, Pavia de Ranton, Ric de Aldwic, Will fil Anketil, Hugo de Granfold, Adam fil Asemund, John fil Remfred de Baumton, Levingus Wm. fil Levenod. THE PIPE ROLLS. ISS OF THE FINES AND SCUTAGE OF KNIGHTS OF THE 3RD SCUTAGE, ASSESSED AT 2 MARCS. Adam de Bedingfield, 3 m. for J, Robert Maluvel Tichill. The Sheriff accounts for 5 m. for Simon Basset for 3J ; Robert Bech (?) I, Rad de Gresley 3, Eustace de Mortain, Hugh de Weddon .... of the Hon. of Tichill, Roger de Bevcote i, Gilbert de Arches 2, Rann de Novomercato . . . Robert de St. Quinten i of I, Roger de Monachus i, Oliver de Welleboef J. Will fil Wachel 30 m. for 4 knights for the Honour of Tickhill. 5 m. for the Honour of Peverel. 4 m. for I & i knights for the Honour of Lancast 10 m. for I knight and i of I of same Honour. 15 m. 5 and 3 of same Honour. 10 m. 2 of same Honour. C. S. I ,, V I m. fee, i of the Honour of Tickhill. c. s. for I of the Honour of Tickhill. 15 m. for 4 of the Honour of Tickhill. 3 m. for I for the Honour of Tickhill. c. s. for the Honour of Tickhill. 6 m. de scutage. 2 m. de scutage. 4 m. for the same. John Aincourt Rad de St. George Robert de Vavasor - Rann de Meres Michael de Malnuers Galf Monachus Gervase de Wiverton Robert de Hareston Yvo de Heriz Wm. Pincerna Eustace de Moretein Doun Bardolf - Wm. Chaucis The Archbishop of York The following are excused :— The Earl of Ferrars, Ranulf de Meres Earl of Chester, Henry de Stuteville. 156 THE PIPE ROLLS. SCUTAGE OF THE HONOUR OF PEVEREL. 9 knights' fees and a half in divers counties. The sheriff accounts for 121 m. for the 3rd' scutage for the Honour of Peverel, for which . . . knights have quittance by fine for 31 m., and those who have quittance by brief, 79 m. 5s. 46. and 19 m. Robert de la Saucer, for I fee. Sampson de Strelly, i. Wm. fil Robert de Essibi, i. Thom le Despens, |. Jacob de Mara, \. Hugh del Alnei, J^ Peter de Goldington, 4. Hugh de Stanton, J. Richard de Stapelford, i. Ralf fil Robert, |. Ralf de Normanville, i. Simon Pakeman and Robert fil Roger. The following are excused : — Philip de Ulecotes i for J fee, Hugh de Insula 3, Yvo de Heriz 4, Rad de Gresley 3, Galf de Pavelli 4, Gervase de Wiverton i. Comes de Ferrars 3J, Simon Basset i, Robert Brito i, Eustace de Mortain 3, John de Aincourt J, Constab Cestriae 3, Hugo de Belcap i, Henr de Grei6, Hugo de Staunton J, Rich de Vern 40s. for i|. The same sheriff owes 5 m. for 2| fees in Bolsover. The sheriff of Oxford 2j fees in Moliton and Emiton. The sheriff of Suffolk i fee in Burton in Suffolk. The sheriff of Essex i in Torningdon. The sheriff of Northampton i in Goldburc and i in Blachal vesl. The sheriff of Bucks, and Bed. i fee in Haversham. SCUTAGE OF TICKHILL. The sheriff accounts for 121 m. and J for 60 knights, and ^ and ^. The constable of Chester 8 fees of his own, and 2 of Wm. fil Robert, whom he had in custody. Gerard de Furnival, 51 fees. Ad de Novo mercato 4 knights, Philip de Ulecotes i. Will de Creissi 4, Eustace de Vesci 3- of I, Robert de Vetereponte 2 parts of I, Will fil Walchel 4, Wm. Pincerna I, Hugo de Hedon 2, Roger de Bevcote l, Gileb de Arches 2, Rann de Novo mercato THE PIPE ROLLS. 157 i of I, Robert de St. Quinten i of i, John de Aincourt and Hugo de Staunton, Robert le Vavaser i of i, Pavia de Ranton |, Tom de Wulrington, Rad de Misterton, and Robt. de Ordeshal 2 for io| knights fees in Yorkshire, 21 m. for which the sheriff ought to respond ; Roger Monachus i fee. OF OBLATIONS. Simon de St. Mauro ;£^20 for having the custody of the land and the heir of Philip de Derby until he be of age. The men of Chesterfield 2 marcs that they may buy and sell stained cloth (tinctos pannos) as they were accustomed in the time of King Henry. The men of Newark 2 m. for the same. Hugo de Stweton c. m. that his daughter and heiress should marry whom she pleased. Nic de Etewell 3 m. for an assize between him and John fil Frano concerning 12 virgates of land in Ettewell. In lands given to Peter de Derby, 12s. 8d. for 4 bovates in Normanton ; Wm. fil Galfry c. s. in Chelardeston. pipe IR0. 49, r. 13—5 5obn. Hugh Bardolf, sheriff. — Reginald de Kardvil for him. ALLOWANCES. Sewal Gailor, of Nottingham. For works upon the tower of Bolsover, £,7 12s. by the view of Robert Propositus and Roger de Barlburc ; works at Melburn by the view of Robert fil Harald and Wm. his brother. Payments to William Wilde, Robert Lefthand, Galf Clic, and Hugh de Pec ; Wm. Merchereston ; David the Jew owes 2 marcs because he denied that he carried venison in the forest. AMERCEMENTS. Ralf fil Walter de Labecot, Wm. de Hemedeston, Robt fil Alan, Rad de Luvetot, Osb fil Regin, Walter de Ravensesbi, Robert de Ulecotes, Ralf Taillefer, Walter fil Gamel, Roger de Caleston. 158 THE PIPE ROLLS. NEW OBLATIONS. William Avenel 4 m. for having writ of mort ancestor for i fee in Basselow and Bubbehill ; Cardeburg and Froggate v. Simon Basset, Richard Vernon, and Alice, his wife. (It does not appear what was the nature of this claim, probably the elder Wm. Avenel had no power to give his estates with his daughters in marriage whilst he, William, the heir male, was alive.) William de Albini c. £ for having seizin of his land of Oskinton. William de Hereford v. the Abbot of Rufford concerning 50 acres of land and 50. acres of meadow in Akring. Henry Brito de Huckenal 6 m. for having the custody of the land of Wm. fil Coste and the marriage of his heir. Robert de Beverle, 10 m. for relief for i fee of the Honour of Tickhill ; Alice, widow of Hugh de Sandeby, 20 m. and i palf for the custody of the heir of the said Hugh ; Emma de Cheineato 3 m. for having the custody of Rohesia and the land which was Hugo Cotci's, if she, the said Rohesia, was willing to be in her custody. Robt fil Richard half a mark, that it might be enquired whether he held of the king or not. Robert fil Peter de Briminton 50 m. for having the manor of Wichenton as his father held it, with its appurts., by the charter of the king. Galf de Pavelli assize with Agnes fil Wm. de Ruttinton, 3 bovates in Ruttington ; Richard de Stanford and his associates, Robert fil Godfrey for writ concerning 2 bovates of land in Legerton v. Nigel de Legerton and Cicely, his wife, against the coming of the justices ; John de Aincourt and Rad de Wileby 25 m. and i palf for having the land which was Serlo de Pleslie's, with the king's confirmation ; Wm. Comes de Ferrars D. m. for having the manor of Wirksworth and Esseburn, with the Wapentake in fee and in inheritance. Jordan de Tolka v. Wm. de Abbetot. Henry fil Adam v. Will fil Ketel and Margaret his wife, whose heir he is, land in Nottingham. OF THE GIFTS OF THE PRELATES. Prior of Blyth 6 m.. Prior of Wirksworth 6 m. THE PIPE ROLLS. 159 Zbc 4tb Scutaae of Iking 3obm THE HON. OF PEVEREL. Robt de Salic Rich de Colville - Matilde de Somerville Galf de Pavelli Wm. de Nonancourt Thorn Despens - Jacobus de la Mere Robert Briton de Walton Sewell de Barlburc Eustace de Morton Yvo Heriz Sim Pakeman and Robert fil Roger Rad de Gresle Rich Camara Rad de Sibtorp Gerv de Wiverton Adam de Kokefield Galf de Brinnesley Robert de Passis - Reginald de Colwic Henry de Hucknal Simon Basset and Richard de Vernon Samps Strelly Wm. fil Robert de Essebi Hugo de Alneto Hugo de Stainton and John de Aincourt Rad Gernon Robt de Birchwood Milo de Belcap and Richard his brother Gervase de Wiverton Robert de Harston Rad de Normanville 4 m. for I fee. i m. I m. lo m. for 4 fees. 3 m. for I. I m. for |th of i, I m. 40s. 20s. 10 m. 10 m. 3 m. c. s. 3 m. 20s. 1 m. 20s. los. for his serjeantry. los. for his serjeantry. 2 m. i m. 10 m. for 3 fees. 3 m. for I fee. 9 m. for 3. 1 m. for ^ of r. 4 m. for I. 5 m. for I a fee. I m. for -i. 3 m. for I Breston, I m. for i. I fee. I m. for ^. I m. for ^. Philip de Ulecotes The followifig are excused : — The Earl of Ferrars, Hugo de Insula, the Constable of Chester, Henr Grai. l60 THE PIPE ROLLS. THE HONOUR OF TICKILL. Wm. de Selton, Robert Briton, Adam de Novoforo, Robert fil Pagan, Tom fil Richard, William fil Wachel, Hugh de Sandibi, Hugh de Staunton, John de Heincourt, Roger Monachus, Wm. Pincerna, Rad Selvain, Adam de Harton, Wm. fil Hubert, per serjantia. Dna de Buketon, Wm. de Lunden, Hugo de Hedun, Robt. de St. Quinton, and Ran de Novoforo, and Robt. le Vavasor, Wm. de Nevil, Gilb de Arches, Pavia de Ramton, Rad de Misterton, Roger de Bevercote, Hugo Forrester, Robert de Chevercourt, Hugo de Stainton. Eustace de Fanconbridge 3 m. ^ Ad de Bedingfeld. Nigel de Luvitot 30m.de : scutage for 1 5 knights. John de Builli - 12 m. „ 6 „ Tom de Wulrington 3SS- 7d. 1 1 Roger de Montebegonis 28s. 8d. 1 » 10" Wm. de Cressi - 10 m. 4 Constable of Chestre 16 8 who has release fee. 2 m. for the land of Will fil Robert. Gerard Furnival lOj m. 5i Philip de Ulecotes 2 m. I Robert de Vipont 1 8s. 2 pts. of I. OF THE SCUTAGE OF THE KNIGHTS OF THE COUNTY WHO DO NOT HOLD OF THE SAID HONOURS Oliver de Wellbeof i m. | of i. Walter de Haia - i m. i of i. Hubert fitz Ralf - - 40 m. for 14 fees Peter Picot - 40s. p. serjantia. Gilebert de Norfolk i Peter de Sandiacre - 20 m. 7 fee. Doun Bardolf - 60 m. 25 Wm. de Chauces 12 3 Rich Malbisse i \ THE PIPE ROLLS. l6l Wm. fil Galfry - Henr Hose - - - Tom de Sandal and Wm. de Santon The monks of Swineshead - Henry de Stuteville Rad de Gousle Heirs of Oliver de Aincourt - Dna Alina de Watton - 20S. for I fee in Meleburn. 3 m. I in Cotgrave. 10 m. for his scutage. 2 m. 12 m. c. s. Wm. St. Paul Matilde de Chalz Rad fil Rad Arch Ebor Rich de Trowell I in Flintham. 6 mil. 2 mil de Hon. Gant. I 25 m. 12J I m. I fee of the hon- our of Richmond. 6 m. fees in Leirton, Kirtlingt'on, and Muscamp. I m. for J of I mil in Trowell, and 20s. for | fee in Bevercote. The Brothers of the Hospital of Jerusalem J m. that it might be inscribed upon the Great Roll that Walter Malet conceded, and by his charter confirmed to God and the Blessed Mary and St. John the Baptist and the blessed poor according to the rules of the hospital, and the brethren of the same house serving God for the good of the soul of his lord King John of England, and for the soul of his queen and of her heirs, and of Roger de Buron, and for his father and mother, etc., the vill of Oscinton in free and pure alms, and which premises he held by the concession of Roger de Buron and the said Walter Malet for himself and his heirs, warranted that the said vill should remain devoted to the said house and hospital for its prayers. IPfpe flo. 50, r. 13— 6 3obn. Wm. Briwere, sheriff; Wm. Leche his deputy. Magister Alan de Bolsover, Will Wilde, Will fil Ralf, Augustine Corner, ;^2i reviewed for the castle of Nottingham ; and Richard de Lesington 30 m. for re-stocking the manor of Lesington. 1 62 THE PIPE ROLLS. Robert de Ferrars ;^20 5s., and c. m. delivered to the said Robert for the fees which he had of the king's gift. PLEAS BY R. DE CORNHILL. Daniel Pincerna, of the king, 30s. rent of the mill of Worm- hill for half a year by the writ of King John. The mill belongs to the said rental of the High Peak, and Robert de Ferrars 62s. id. by the said writ. Godfrey de Albini, brother of the Earl of Arundel, promised ;£'i,000 for having Matilde de Calceto, who had been the wife of Ralf fil Stephen, to wife if she would accept him. In the Treasury nothing, and the king pardoned the said Godfrey the said .£'1,000 by his writ. ' John de Saltu Capoli (Sacheverel). Robert fil Roger (see in Norfolk), Robert Chacecapel, Beatrix, widow of Teobald (Mone- tar of Nottingham?), Peter fil William, Will de Cressi, Wm. Pincerna 2^ m. for his relief, Elias the Dean. AMERCIAMENTS. Rann de Canwick, Roger fil William, Osmerus Sel, Osbert fil Ralf, Hugo Bardolf, John de Hadfield. The goods of Peter le Caruier, Robert de Catebi, Adam fil Rad, John de Hadfield, Rad de Willegebi. OBLATIONS. Jordan de Toke, Henr fil Adam, Wm. fil Robert de Essebi, Hugo de Kniveton (Kneto), Milo de Belcap, Ralf de Norman- ville (see Rutland), Robert de Chevercourt. NEW OBLATIONS. John Pincerna accounts for 10 m. for having the land which was Wlmi de Wudham's, which the king gave to him when Earl of Moreton, and for confirmation thereof Robert de Vipont i palfrey, p Peter de Mallai, Hugo de Nevil I pal. for the same. Hugh de Acovre J m. for a writ. Robert fil William de Chauces accounts for c. m. and i THE PIPE ROLLS. 163 palfrey for his relief and passage, and for the king's charter for the lands which he held by charter, viz., i fee. Robert de Muscamp 15 m., that he may be relieved of the custody of the Castle of Harestoii. Galf de Mustiers 1. m. for having Amicia de Sablello to wife with her land xxv. m. paid on account. Robert Malovel 12 m. for his relief for his land. Richard le Fleming 80 m. for having the peace, and for selling wine contrary to the assize, for which he was convicted. Ralf Barre sues Wm. de Barre for 4 bovates of land in Teversholt, the 3rd part of a marc fee. Henry de Lichfield 7 m. 9s. 8d., so that Sewell fil Henry should be adjudged to restore him the same amount. Matilde de Sumerville 15 m. and i palfry that she need not be compelled to marry. Rad de Matloc 20 m. for having his land of Matloc until his suit (loquela) of warranty of Charter is heard against the Earl of Ferrars. (This is interesting, in proof that Matloc was a well established name within little more than a century of the date of Domesday, so that it is hardly likely that it is an identical name with that of Mestesford.) Wm. brother of Joscelin (qy. de Steynesbi), Wm. de St. Patric, Malger de Saxendale, Ysolda de Bredon, Roger de Lanum, Godfrey fil Alexander, Reginald Bulecote, Barthw de Staft- word, William de Claworth, Walter Malet, are mentioned. Leonia, widow of Robert de Stuteville, owes cc. m. for having seizen of all her land with her chattels, of which she was seized after she had been disseized by the precept of the king, on account of the son of the said Leonia, as she said. In the Treasury c. m., and she owes c. m. Michael de Malnuers owes c. m. for having the presentation of the church of Holm against Ralf Pluket because the king ought to have the presentation this turn. FINES MADE IN THE ITINERARY OF THE KING. Ralph Newmarch i m. pro stult loquit (bad pleading), Roger Monachas, Ralf Maluvel, Galf de Elmet, Henr de 1 64 THE PIPE ROLLS. Eton, Wm. de Belmes 20 m., Simon, Nicolas, and Wm. Humblecumble, Lucas de Morton, and Alice de Talveston. ^be 5tb Scutage of Iking 3obn. HON. Yvo de Heriz Rich de Cama Robert fil Robert Galf de PavelH Simon Bassett Rad de Gresley Robt. fil William de Essebi Robert de Saucer - Robert. Breton John de Aincourt - Hugh de Stiveton - Samps de Strelley Walter de Hertwell (Herthill ?) Wm. de Nonancourt and the same in Upton. Richard Le Abbe - Galf de Trowell Robert de Passeis Reginal de Colwick Ad de Cokefield Wm. de St. Patric Wm. fil Robert Galfe de Norton DE PEVEREL. 16 m. for 3 fees. 6 I 2 i 16 4 9 I 18 3 5bi - 1 3 3 10 I 6 I 2 i i h 4 I 6 I 12 2 I per serjantia. I 2 - i6s. 8d. I mil. - 6 m. & 4od. 2| - c s. 3 6 m. I but Peter de Stokes complained that he should have that fee by the king's writ. Rich de Belcap and Milo his brother. The following were excused : — ^Henr de Grai, Hugo de Belcap, Rich de Vernon, Hugh de Insula, Sewell fil Henry, Peter de Goldington, Philip de Ulecote, Com de Ferrars. Hubert fil Ralf, accounted for c. m. and i palf, 15 fees. Walter de Haia i m. -J- Oliver de Welbeof 2 m. ^ THE PIPE ROLLS. 165 Hugo fil Robert 5 m., because he holds by one Sparrow Hawk per annum. Peter de Picot 6 m., because he holds the land of Ratcliff by serjeantry (Austere), (Ostricia). Gervase de Wiverton ^ m. for \ mil. de hon. Pev. The following were excused by writ : — Hubert de Burg, John de Leche, Gerard de Furnival, the Bishop of Lincoln, William Braiose, Robert Gresley, Jolland de Nevill, Rann de Maresia, Godfr de Albini, Hubert fil Ralf, the Bishop of Norwic, Roger de Mortimer, Richard Basset, the Earl of Chester, Henry de Stuteville, Fulk Painel, Gilbert de Gant, Will de Molbrai, Doun Bardolf, Magister Alan de Bolsover. (This is a very infamous scutage, worse, perhaps, for its illegality than any which have preceded it. The amounts levied were enormous, and out of all proportion to the fees. Some of these knights paid six marcs per fee, others four. Hubert fitz Ralf was assessed at 100 marcs and one palfry for his 15 fees, though he was excused payment of anything. The list of the great men excused shows a large number of King John's judges. The Chief Justice Hubert de Burg heads the list. They were generally as voracious and dishonest as John himself. Here, too, the Serjeants were taxed quite illegally. OBLATIONS. Rad de Andevill 10 m. for leave to come before the king or his Chief Justices of the Forest. The burgesses of Derby owe 66 marcs and 2 palfreys for having their town of Derby at fee farm ; that is to say, by ancient farm (antiquam firmam), and for the rent (cremento) of ;^io for all services, and for having a similar charter to that granted to the burgesses of Nottingham. (This is a very interesting entry, and it accounts for the reference in the charter granted this year to Derby to the Nottingham customs (see " Records of Chesterfield," published for Mr. Alderman Gee, page 19). Here, also, we find that peculiar expression, old farm or ancient farm, which appears in the first great Roll of the Pipe with reference to the estates of Hubert fitz Ralf. Here, clearly, it cannot refer to the mere arrears of the rent, as no doubt it generally does, but it l66 THE PIPE ROLLS. is used very much in tlie sense of old feoffment ; but perhaps it is proof that Derby was of the ancient demesne of the Crown, proof of which is wanting both in the case of Derby and of Nottingham ; the latter town especially does not appear to be of this tenure.) William Briwere owes 40 m, for having Chesterfield with Briminton, and Witinton with the soke and wapentake of Scars- dale, and for having the manor of Axminster in Devon, and for having other liberties according to the tenor of the king's charter, which he holds pertaining to them. (This entry is very valuable, and very puzzling. Perhaps it is the consideration for the charter which is published at page i of the Records of Chesterfield ; but if so, where is the first charter. That in all probability was granted by King John when he was Earl of Morton, probably in 6 Richard I., in which year also William Briwere was also sheriff. That charter is pro- bably the groundwork of the certificate which William Briwere gave for his knights' fees. Chesterfield, etc., was then held by the service of half a knight's fee. The charter of the 6th of John is at fee farm, because probably William Briwere himself, being a judge (and a most voracious one), dare not openly defy the law. That charter was invalid, not only on account of its informality in so treating part of the demesne lands of the Crown, but that King Richard's death put an end to it, no king can legally bind the possessions of the Crown longer than for his own life.) FINES OF THE HON. OF PEVEREL OF TICHILL OF THE FIFTH SCUTAGE AT 2^ M. Robert Vipont, Rich Belcap for him renders composition, Ralf Salvain, Robt. Briton, Adam fil Robert, Roger Monach, Rann de Newmarch, the daughter of Robert de Furniell, Pavia de Ranton, Dna de Buketon, Will fil Hubert and fil Adam de Hanton and Hugo Forester, Walter de Schelton, Tom fil Richard, Gilbert de Arches, Hugo de Heddon, the heirs of Robert Maluvel, Robt de St. Quinton, Will de Nevil, Robt de Mustreton, Roger de Bevercote, Wm. Pincerna, Hugo de Stiveton, Hugo de Stainton, Robt de Chevercourt, Hugo de Sandebi. THE PIPE ROLLS. 167 Hugh de Molbrai owes 60 m. for tailiage, Walter fil Regin 2. Robert Vipont paid c. m. for having the marriage of the widow of Hugh (qy. Henry) de Hastings, which he had of the Bishop of Norwich, in Fork Marsh, in Norfolk. The sheriff accounts for the sale of the goods of Roger de Wills, William de Kyme, Rad de Manschalt. Scutage of William de Luvetot, de misericordia, Richard de Stanford, and for having the custody of Adam de Bellaaqua (Bellew). pipe mo. 51, r. 19.-7 5obn. Robert de Vipont and Richard de Bellocampo as keepers (custodes). The Hermite of St. Edwin de Haia de Birchwood allowed 40s. by the writ of the king. Galf de Georz (Jorz) and Richard de Lessington, Foresters, £18 6s. 8d. in Carlton and Derleton, and for carrying 40 tons (tonellj of wine from Bristol to Nottingham. £ig 9s. 126. works at Peak Castle by the view of Elys de Cornhille and Ralf de Heriz. The men of Nottingham £62 bl. for the farm of their town. Wm. Briwere accounts for £jg for the farm of Chesterfield, etc., and owes £18 for the rent (cremento) of Witenton, but this ought not to be exacted, because it was comprised in the farm of Chesterfield ; ;^IS 13s. 4d. for the farm of the Honour of Peverel from the 8th year of King Richard, and for Peak 40s. Sd. for the farm of the same honour for 3 years ; and £2^ 19s. 4d. for the farm of Tickhill from the 8th year of King Richard ; ;£'232 I2s. for the farm of the Hon. of Bolsover. For the land of Matilde de Calz, that is to say Lessington, with its appurts. Rich de Lessington as keeper £7 i8s. 5d., for rent £20 17s. lod., and ;^43 Os. 3d. for corn sold off the same manor, 40s. for bacons sold ; allowed 25 m. for scutage for 7^ fees. Sum, ;^iOO 9s. iid. 2i fees Robert de Creveceur in Halton. Ganlike, Billesdon, and Kolveaton, Wm. de Belvoir 20s. (It would seem from these entries that the great Judge had 1 68 THE PIPE ROLLS. forgotten to pay his rents for a number of places for no less than eight years, and then only at a nominal figure. It will be seen when the history of this worthy man is unfolded that these charges were merely blinds, and that he paid nothing, or hardly anything, relying upon the king's dispensing powers. In this Roll there is an entry to the effect that Wm. Briwere owed 40 m. for having Chesterfield, as mentioned in the preceding Roll, that he paid half, but was excused the other half because he brought into his account against himself 600 marcs for certain debts by the custody of Robert Bertram, which the king gave to Peter de Brus.) OF THE PLEAS OF THE COURT. Fines, etc. : Galf de Pavelli, Hugo de Acour, Hy de Luvetot, John fil Herbert ; Will de Beston accounted for 10 m. that he might be permitted to return to religion. Walter de Stanton, Alexr de Buaderton. NEW OBLATIONS. Richard fil Robert 10 m. for having seizin of 14 bovates of land, with its appurts, in Bingham, and the scutage of 8 bovates in the same, of which Robert de Bingham, his father, died seized, and which were in the king's hands. Robert de Carduil c. £ and i palfry for having the marriage of Sarra, the widow of Hugh de Stanton, for the use (ad opus) of his brother Nicolas. Prior and canons of Newsted 10 m. and i palfry for having the king's confirmation of the charter of King Henry, the father of the king, and of the charter of the king himself whilst Earl of Morton, of that place and of other their lands, according to the tenor of their charters which they still possessed. (The infamy of this transaction is patent. It would be curious to learn whether these charters were amongst those found secreted in the brazen eagle thrown by the monks into the lake at the great Reformation.) Henr de Daneston 20s. that the wood of Somersall should be divided between himself and Avic de Albini, from which two parts remained to the said Avic and the rest to himself, and of THE PIPE ROLLS. 169 which he, Henry, complained that the said Avic destroyed that wood. (The relevancy of this entry has not yet been ascer- tained. It is curious, however, to see that one of the Somersalls was held by a Montgomery and the other by Fitz Herbert. Is there any connection between the family of Montgomery of Derbyshire and the Albinis ? If so, it is probably clear that they are of the family of the Earl of Shropshire and Arundel. Somersall is mixed up with the Montgomery estates.) Hugo de Acour 20s. for having a suit with William de Mont- gomery concerning Snelleston. Walter fil Ivo | m. for an assize (mort ancestor) of 5 bovates in Button v. William Malesoures and Juetta, his wife, and Alice, mother of Juetta. William de Canville and Albreda, his wife, a writ of right concerning half a fee in Childcote. Robert Pe'issun, Robert fil Richard, Rann de Newmarch, Jordan Toke, Robert de Beaufoy. Sarra, widow of Hugh de Stanton, c. £ and 2 palfreys for license that she should not be compelled to marry unless at her will. (King John was certainly impartial. He has just accepted a fine of c. £ and l palfry from Robert Cardoil for this very lady's marriage.) Barnabas fil Walter 40 m. for having i fee in Hertwell (qy. Herthill), of which Walter, his father, died seized. Elizabeth, widow of Simon Basset, 80 m. for her inheritance, of which she was disseized after the death of her husband, and that she should not be compelled to marry unless by her own will. William Toke 3 m. for 15 jurors, because 12 made a false oath, as he affirms, in an assize of novel disseizin, which Robert de Toke brought against him concerning 7 bovates of land in Chelum, which he gave to him. Henry fil Savell 40s. for having the like seizin in Edensor, which he had when he entered the service of the king with the Earl of Ferrars. Barnabas fil Walter paid 30 m. for his fees (Hertwell). AMERCIAMENTS. Wm. Belveiz, Rad fil Erneis, Peter fil Ralf, Richard Faber, 23 lyo THE PIPE ROLLS. Walter Kingsbond, Ralf le Coifier, Walter Staunton, Will fil Beatrix, Robt Brito. (Tbe 6tb Scutage, Ibons, of peverel anb ^icbill, assesseb at 2 marcs. Com de Ferrars 137 m. for 6^ fees. Hubert fil Ralf 30 Leonia de Stutevill - 30 Rich de Malbisse h Wm. Briwere 20 m. los. de Hon Buron. Arch Ebor 6 m. Henry Hose 2 Tom de Sandal 2 Will de Stanton 2 Rad de Grousle 2 Rad fil Rad I m. Rich de Trowell 20s. Will de Molbrai 9h Rich Bassett 3 The Earl of Chester - S Henry de Grai 12 Wm. de Chaucis 12 m. John de Aincourt c. s. Eustace de Morton c. s. Galf de Pavelli 20 m. Uxor Simon Basset 3 Wm. fil Robt de Essebi 20 m. Rich de Vernon c. s. Yoo de Heriz - IS m. Robert Brito de Walton - 3 Sampson de Strelly - 3 Galf de Sakeville 10 Hugo de Stainton 2 Will Hosato S Hugh de Haversham 3 Heirs of Walter de Hertwell 2 Wm. fil Wachel de Duston 3 m- THE PIPE ROLLS. Rich de Catnara Galf de Norton Rich St. Abbe Robert de Hose Wm. de St. Patric Wm. de Coleville Wm. de Sibtorp Gilbt de Norfolk Ralf Barre Robt fil Serlo Robert de Somerville 40s Adam de St. Maria 20s. 171 5 3 4 2 9 2 I S 20s. 20s. pipe mo. 52, V. 13.-8 5obn. Robert Vipont, Rich de Bellocap (custodes). Wm. Briwere ;^8 for Snotington (Sneinton), £yg for Cester- field, allowed the lepers of Chesterfield £6, and excused pay- ment of ^73. Hugo de Nevel 2 bovates in Stredley. Land of Matilde de Calz, i.e., of Lessington. Rich de Lessington, Robert, his son, for him, ;£^2 8s. 5d. and ^4 of the like composition of Will de Albini. Alice, wo. of Hugh de Sandibi. Hy de Lechfield 2 m. AMERCIAMENTS. Rich de Luvetot, Wm. fil Galfry, Yoo de Heriz, Wm. gen. Presb., Hugh Liulfot, Edmund Propositus, Wm. Brito, Galf de Muston, Robt fil Botilde, Alice filia William Wace, Rich fil Robert, Wm. Tuke, Tom de Weston, Robert de Sumville, Robert Surries, Hugh fil Gamel, Wm. fil Richard, Roger the Dean, Stephen fil Geri, Rich fil Walkelin, Ric de Curcun, Wm. Propositus, Wm. Palmer, Walter fil Wm., Robt fil Turg, William de Haia, Mathew de Estanton, Will de Tirsnell, Gervase de Clifton, Adam de Kokefield, Tome de Wine, Alan de Norman- ton, Nicol de Wilinton, Robt fil Walkelin, Gilbt fil Jordan, Peter de K(at)clive, Robert fil Ascelin, Galfr fil Toke, Galf Ruff, 172 THE PIPE ROLLS. Lucas de Michel, Walter de Ecclesall, Will fil Baldwin, Phil de Wilneton. NEW OBLATIONS. Hugh de Acover Assize for one carucate of land in Snellston V. Roger Pitcalf and Margt. his wife. Robert de Toke and Wm. de Toke, concerning 7 bovates in Kelum. Tom de Curcun i m., for having a writ concerning i knight's fee in Ketelston. John de Ayvil 40 m. Tom Armig, 30s. for the land of Tideswell. Rich de Belcap for the goods of William iil William. Eustace de Moreton, c. £ for having the custody of the land and heir of Ranulf de Maresia, saving to the king the marriage of the heir. Stephen fil Swain for a writ of mort ancestor. John Camera and Orenta his wife Assize v. John Levesliam. Abbot of Darley and Magister Ascelin (Vice-Archdeacon), owed 18 m., Rad de Berkier. Barnabas de Hertwell, Hugo de Insula, Galf Sacheverel, Leonea de Stuteville, Hubert fil Rad, Walter de Haia. Hon. of Peverel. Will fil Wachel, Sarra de Bellaaqua. IPipe IRo. 53.-9 Jobn. R. ViPONT, Rich. Belcap, as keepers, etc. In works upon the Castle of Peak by the view of Rad de Heriz and Robert le Ragged. The heirs of Costo Falconer £6 los. in Huggenal and Kirkebi. John de Saturn capsiole (Sacheverel). Florence fil Richard Murdac owes 5 m. because she receded against Agnes de Gundeville, Sussex, and in Wilts. Anno 7. ^be 7tb Scutage of Ikina 3obn. Barnabas de Hertwell 3 m. Galf de Sacville 5 m. THE PIPE ROLLS. 173 Leon de Stuteville - 21s 8d Hubert fil Ralf -£20. Hugo de Insula - g j^ Roger de Montebegonis - - - riQ Rad de Gresley - 20s Yoo de Heriz Rich L'abbe IIS. - 4 m. Peter de Goldington ^ s Wm. de St. Patric - - . q ^ Peter de Vadis - . . 20s., but Philip de Ulecote had release by the writ of the king. Tom Despens - - . - x. s Adam Brito - . 60s. de scutage de Tickhill. Gilbt. de Arches - 5 „, Robt. de Beverels 2 Dna de Loudham - -Am. John de Builli . c. s. John Flanders . 20s. AMERCIAMENTS BY H. BASS. Richard de Benetley J m., Peter de Briminton J m., Oliver fil Nigel, Warenus de Tideswell i, Tom Foljambe i ; in thoro I m. and owes | m. Robert fil Alan, William Bassett. Walter de Heliun, Alexr. de Hadsop, Tom de Overhaddon, Matilde fil Jordan, Will Balegi, Robert Venator, Robert de la Morhagh, Will fil Walkelin, Hugo Saxi, Wm. le Corner Senex., Wm. le Corner Junr., Robt. Swin, Robt. Gule, Alice Chapman, Henry fil Ernulf, Galf Lapareillur, Rich fil Ingelram, Robert fil Falcon. NEW OBLATIONS. Walter de Strelley owes i falcon for having seizin of the land which was his father's the day he died. The farmer of Chesterfield owes 20 m. for having six pounds of silver each year for receiving at Chesterfield the farm of the same Manor by the hand of the farmer in exchange for the tolls which the king gave them when he was Earl of Moreton in the market and fair of Chesterfield, and for having the charter of the king to that intent. 174 THE PIPE ROLLS. Eustace, parson of Ludenham. Tom de Curcun owes 20s. for license of concord with Richard de Curcon. Abbot of RufFord in Welhag. Philip Mimekan has the house at Clipston with the lands, and 20 Hbrates of land which were promised to Galf de George and Rich de Lessington. Prior of Newsted ought to answer concerning the Prebend of Oxton, as he has it from His Eminence the Roman Cardinal at farm. Galf de Georz (lort) owes 200 m. and 4 palfreys, because the king pardoned him on account of some default when he had his forests, and for having his lands which the king seized. Isabella, widow of Rann de Maresie, 50 m. and I palfrey, that she might not be distrained to marry herself if she did not wish to marry whilst she was not with the king's enemies, and for having reasonable dower and portion of the goods and chattels of her husband. Godfrey Spigurnal owes 20 m. for having 5 bovates of land and a mill of the king's at Skeggesby at fee farm. Ralf de Lavered land at Sibtorp. Philip de Ulecotes owes 40 m. and i palfrey per Robert de Burdgate, for having the marriage of the widow of Walter de Careio. See Norf Ipipe IRo. 54 —U 3obn. NO NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. IPipe IRo. 55, r. 10— II Jobn. ROBT DE ViPONT AND RiCH DE Belcap Custos for 'him answered for the farm of the County fee for the past year. Gerard de Ancia, (Philip Marc for him) for the farm of the County this year. Brian de Insula for the farm of Peverel with Bolsover. Works at Harestan Castle by the view of Wm. le Vavasor and Robt. de Bevcote, John fil Adam, Rann Camara. THE PIPE KOLLS. 175 Leon de Stuteville, 28s. 5d. Agnes, widow of Galfry Georz, 50 m. for custody of the land and his heir and her own dower. Rich Britonis, Tom Foljambe, Warner de Tideswell, John de Aincourt v. Robert de Lisures, view of the neighbourhood of Pleslie. Simon fil Falconer 30 m. for having the land which was Robert Bevell's in Bevercote, Melveton, and Marcham, which descended to him by inheritance. Helewise, widow of William fil Robert, 120 marks and 4 palfreys that she should not be compelled to marry. Jordan de Toke accounts for 16 marks and i colt of the stud of the Earl of Ferrars, for seizin of the mill of Potlake and his land at Hulton. Tom Armiger 30 m. and i palfrey for having the Manor of Tideswell at fee farm, at 60s. per annum. Rad de Wilibi,^ tenant of the Archbishop of York, Malveisin (de Hercey) and Thophania his wife, and William Ruffus and Ysabel his wife, 50 m. and 2 palfreys for having two fees which were Gilbert de Arches, father of their said wives. Johanna, widow of Robert de Bevercote, 20 m. and i palfrey for certain land which Robert sold before he married her. Adam fil Wm. and Isabelle his wife, assize concerning Kelum against Peter fil Maurice. Godfrey Spigurnal, Robert de Everingham, Walter de Deyvill, Hugh de Rodmersfeld, Hugh de Rodmerthwaite, Sarra widow of Hugh Stanton, Peter cleric de Castre, for having the land of Galfry de Rependen in the soke of Weston. OF THE PLEAS OF THE FOREST. Wm. parson de Alreton, Wm. de Lech cm., Robert de Titibi, Adam de St. Maria, Robert Parvus, Nic Salfario, Hugo Forester, Will Cemetar, Nic Gombald, Rad de Baaltre, Wm. Bacun, Richard Franceis, Wm. fil Vinet, Robert de Stockport, Rich le Ragged, Alexr. de Malune, Wm. Marescal, Regin Fitz Herbert, Roger de Holbec, Jordan de Smithesbi, Elias de March, Simon fil Roger, Gervase de Clifton, Will de Belveis, Tom de Weston, John de Radford, Regin fil Aldich, Alice fil Jordan, Sewell Gailor, Henry de Hotot, Rad Bugge, Elias 176 THE PIPE ROLLS. de Tornhill, Mich de Ernlier de Birchlis, Heward fil Bernard. Agnes le Corner. Ipipe IWo. 56, r. 12—12 Jobn. Philip Marc, sheriff; Peter Marc, his deputy. Philip Mimekin paid £18 6s. 8d. for the farm of Derlington, Wm. de Kaha, and Guy de Elmdon, Tom I'Esquire, farmer of Tideswell, 60s. Henry Stuteville accounted for 10 marks for the 4th scutage. Richard fil Ingelram. Tom Armiger (p. Brian de Insula) accounted for i palfry for having his manor. PLEAS OF THE FOREST. Fines : William fil Walkelin 10 m. for a default. Ralf Selvein, Joseph Cleric, Wm. de Lech, Robt. de Titibi, Adam de St. Maria, Robt. Parvus, Roger de Montebegonis, 3 palfreys, that it might be enquired whether the Abbot of Trunchal and the Abbot of Berlington ever had anything of the church of Brocton (see in Yorkshire) ; Wm. Maresce, Roger de Welbec, Jordan de Smithesbi, Hugh de Mansfield, Nicol fil Hugh, Nicol de Wilton, Brian de Nottingham, Alexr. de Hatton, Adam fil Malger, Rad fil Erneis, Wm. Bewre, Gervase de Clifton, Barth de Beulaco, Ingelram fil William, Rad Bugge, Rich de Teverai, Robert de Harestan (in Warwick), Elia de Tornhill, Agnes le Corner, Richard Flander, Rad de Gresley. NEW OBLATIONS. Hugh de Nevil, Roger Alneto. Isabella the widow of Simon Basset (Brian de Insula for her) accounted for 20 m. for her passage for one knight's fee which she held in Haddon, and for i a fee which she held in the county of Bucks. Will St. Michael 10 m. for having seizin 43s. rent in Aiwell. Nic Barberel 40 m. for the custody of the land and inheritance of Roger de Buketon and the marriage of his heir, and owes THE PIPE ROLLS. 1 77 five marks, which the Earl of Salisbury ought to acquit him on account of his first fee. John de Nevil 700 m. for his passage, and for having to wife Isabella the widow of Sewell fil Henry, with her whole inheri- tance and dower ; H. de Neville and Philip de Ulecotes are bail for 300 m. Tom de Spencer 5 m. for his fine for having the daughter of Hugo de Insula to wife. Rad Basset, Hubert fil Rad for their passage. Wm. de Duston 20 m. and i palfrey for having the custody of the land and inheritance of Thomas fil Richard with the marriage of his heir. Mags. Alan de Bolsover for his passage. Rann de Tilneia and Wm. his son, Wm. fil Robert de Clipston, Richard cum Barba, Roger de Alneto, Eustace fil Hugh, John de Burne, Elias de Morton, Hugo de Gunton, Hy. de Burton, Wm. fil Marie, Walter fil Orence, Roger de Lanun, Hugo de Calneton, Regin fil Wm., Wm. fil John, Richard de Brestorp, Tom de Muscamp, Robt. de Battel, Walter de Estweit, Alured de Spondon, Alexander de Dorsete ; Leoni de Heriz ;£'io for having his marriage. — (See Roll VII.) Henry de Burton, Richard de Scales, Hugh de Bolbec, Bertrea Countess, Peter fil William de Derby, Robt. de Hedon, Rich de Charciu p. Henr. de Eicring, Rad de St. Patric, Saml. Quartrebuck, John de Builli, Hugo de Stanwat, Robert Francis, Tom fil Ailwin, Robert le Mercer, Tom de Heddon, Gilbert Passur, Richard fil Adam, Wm. fil Richard, Rann de Meresia, Robt. de Bevercote, Chavelsworth Benedictus fil Gamel. Brian de Insula, owes i mark for Tom Foljamb, and 2s. for Lawrence de Wirmhill, and J m. for Tom fil Richard. William de Craven, Robt. Ruffo, Hy. fil Alexander, Orm fil Gilbert, Elias fil Ankel, Robt. de Braibroc had a grant of John de Horsingdon. pipe IRo. 57, r. 2— 13 Jobn. Philip Marc, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. The Earl of Salisbury, by Nic Barberell. 24 178 THE PIPE ROLLS. Henry de Mistton, Wm. fil Robert, Wm. fil Eudonis, and Galfr fil Ascelin. Alice, widow of Alex de Beulac, paid 9 m. for her inheritance. Henry Elect of Exeter, land in Langford ; Walkelin, brother of Henry Peter fil Cecil, William de Lek, Wm. de Ridwar, Regl de Carleol, Wm. de Mara. Rich de Bestorp, Rog de Lanum, Tom de Muscamp, Matilda fil Nicol Peche, Warin, Serjeant of Newerc, Ralf de Caldwell, Robt Despens, Stephen de Tykenhal, Reg de Bramcote, Robt. Furington, Roger de Brumleig. Peter de Sandiacre, c. £ for the King's benevolence. Peter Picot, c. £ for having the land which was Peter Picot's, his father. The heirs of Doun Bardolf 25 fees which were Rad Hanse- lin's. Excused : John Malesour 20s., William Hanselin 40s., for the lands which Hubert de Burg had with his wife, the widow of Doun Bardolf Scutage of Males assesseb at 2 marcs. The heirs of Doun Bardolf 50 m., and for the demesne in the hands of the king 13 m. 4s. 5d. for 6 fees and 3 pts. of i fee of the demesne which his lady had in dower 6 m. 8s. 3 fees and J pt. John de Aincourt i m., Robert de Lysurs 2 m., Walter de Stradley 2 m., Richard de Stapelford 2 m., Rad fil Robert 2 m., Robert Brito 2 m., Gervase de Wiverton Ss. 4d., Robert fil Roger and Simon Pakeman 2 m., John de Monteacuto 2 m., Hugo de Bellocampo 3 m. 2s. 6d. Excused : Tom Despens ^ m., Robert fil William 6 m.. Will fil Robert de Essebi 6 m.. Will Patr 6 m. The following are excused by writ : — Eustace de Moretain, Philip, de Ulecotes, Henr de Grai, Rad de Gresle, Yvo de Heriz, Simon de Kime, Robt. de la Saucer Hospitalers, Hugo de Nevil, Com. de Ferrar, Dominium de Bolsover, Rad Musard, Robert de Chauces, Will Briwere, Wm. de Alberneio, John de Nevill, Ric Abbis, Peter de Goldington, Wm. de Duston in Northampton, Hubert fil Ralf 30 m., Barrabas de Htwell 2 m., Hugo de Haversham 2 m., Will Hose 2 m., Galf de Saukville, Alic de Chastelun, Robert de Hese, Emma de Belfou, Hugh THE PIPE ROLLS. lyg de Dunha, Leonia de Stuteville, Wm. Hose, Hugo de Havseth, Barnabas de Hertwell, Nigel de Lierton, Hugo Oysel, Robt. de Aveley. Wills de Hardreshill, c. m. for having the land of Hugo fil Robert, his brother, whose heir he is. Robert de Sumville, lo m. that Rad de Stock and M . . the widow of Robert Winchewer. Wills fil Erchenbald v. Rann fil Theobald. Galf de Mealton, Robert fil Alex for i bovate in Fenton. John Malesoures, 60 m. and i palfr for having the land which was Will Malesoures, his father, of the fee of Doun Bardolf. pipe mo. 58, r. 17.-14 3obn. Philip Marc, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. Rad de Gresley owes 500 m. for a fine made between him and Robert Lupo. Wm. de Hardreshill c. m. for having his land. John Malesoures 60 m. and I palf for having his father's land. Wm. de Dufton 2 palfreys to be quit of his fine of 20 m. Hy. de Buketon 20 m. for having seizin of the land of which he was disseized. Wm. de Rideware owes c. m. for his transgression, (See Staf- fordshire.) Barrabas de Trowell. Roger Somerville owes 10 m. that Rad de Stok should be put to bail. The Earl of Ferrars one good palfry by the pledge of Wm. de Harcourt. Abbot of Welbec comfirmation of grant of Agatha, daughter and heir of Hugh Bretal, land in Flintham. PLEAS OF THE FOREST. John fil Walter, Robt. de Albonn, Wm. de Argentan, Phil Mimetan, Adam fil Fulc, Robert fil Hugh, Tom de Muscamp ^23 OS, 6d. for pannage, Hy. de Rodleston, Hy. de Carlton, l8o THE PIPE ROLLS. John de Ippestan, John Frarin, Philip de Wineshull, Roger fil Roger, Walter Joslem, Wm. de Bavill, Philip de Kyme, c. m., William de Duston, Walter de Clifford, Wra. de Paesvil, Philip de Toke, Tom Esquire 45s. in Tideswell, Barthw. de Stokes, Walter de Ver, Philip de Lyan, Ric Selvein. ptpe IR0. 59, r. 18.-15 5obn. Philip Marc, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. Henry de Stutevill, Liseard de Musters, Leonia de Stuteville, Tom Foljambe, i m. Lawrence de Wormhill 2s. Peter de Sandiacre c. £ for the king's benevolence. Peter Picot c. £ for the land which was Peter's, his father. pipe IRo. 60, r. 15.— 16 5obn. Philip Marc, -sheriff; Eustace de Ludenham for him. Repairs at Nottingham Castle, per visu Wm. Bugge and Robert de Watton, Ingelram and Wm. le Corner. Henry de Stuteville paid iii m. for the 4th Scut. Michael de Malnuers. Will Hardreshill c. m. for having his land of Claworth. Robert Albini iJio 8s. de misericordia Foresta. Godfrey Andegav. Will and Laurence de Trou. Leon de Malnuers ^10 for his relief. Galf fil Peter c. s. and i good palfry for having the custody of the heir of Walter de Strelly. (This was more judicial corruption). NEW OBLATIONS. Rad de Gresley 500 m. for having the land of Robert de Mus- camp, father of Isabella, his wife, and that he should grant the marriage of Agnes, his sister, to Robert Lupo, for which he had fined D m. THE PIPE ROLLS. l8l William Earl of Ferrars c. £ for having the Manor of Elton which is of his own fee. Yvo de Heriz ccc. £ for having the land of Rad Basset, for which he answers in Warwickshire. Albreda, widow of Robert de St. Quintin, 3 palfrys for license to marry Adam de St. Maria. Alina, widow of William fill Walkelin, 30 m. and i palfry for having her reasonable dower with the chattels which belonged to her of the free tenement of the said William, and that she be not destrained to marry. Wm. Com de Ferrars cc. m. and 2 dextriers for license that Milesent, widow of Hervy Bagot, should give to her son, Hervy de Stafford, her eldest son, the third part of the whole of the land which descended to her jointly with PetroniUa, sister of the said Earl, whom the same Hervy Bagot married at the feast of St. Michael on the 14th of the king. Philip de Ulecotes i palfry for a writ against Leonia de Stute- ville. Roger fil Galfry for having one carucate and a half of land in Trowell which his father held. Robert Bussel v. John Maillard. Wm. de Harestan v. Emma, widow of Hervey. Adam de Newmarch, Wm. de Cressi, Galf de Sausemaria, Yvo de Heriz, Richard Vernon, Ysabel Avenel, Robert de Chances. Gerard de Rhodes and Robert Brito were excused payment. Scutate of ipictaviensis assessed at 3 marc5. The sheriff accounts for half a fee of Rad fil Robert de Sibtorp, Gvase de Wiverton i, John de Aincourt J, Waltr de Stradle i, Robt. de Lysures \, Rich de Stapelford i, John de Monteacuto i, Rad de Gresle 3, Wm. de St. Patric 3, Dna de Nutal 20s., Brethren of the Hospital i, 60s. Godfrey Andegav and Wm. Burdon in Northamptonshire, Robert fil William 3, Wm. fil Robert de Essibi 3, Philip de Ulecotes J, Hugo de Bello- campo I, Galf de Pavelli 4, Peter de Goldington 4, Galf de Sacville, i, Rich de Vernon i|, Isabel Avenel i|, Tom Despens 3, with the daughter of Hugo de Insula, John de Nevil i, Barrabas de Hertwell i, Will Hose i, Robert de Hese i. 1 82 THE PIPE ROLLS. Acquitted by writ : — Henry de Grai 6 in Toueton, Ivo de Heriz 4, Eust de Morton 3, Simon de Kime |, Robt. de la Saucer i, Hugo de Nevil i, Com de Ferrars 3| in Heiham, Gerard de Rhodes i, and in Bolesover 2j, Robert Almari i, Rad de Normanville 2, Hospital i in Blackwell, Hugo de Haversham i, Robert Brito i, Will de Dufton i, Knights of the Hon. of Peverel 66 fees and i i and ^t, Leonia de Stuteville 15, Emma de Belfou i, Hubert fil Ralf 15, Heirs of Doun Bardolf 2$, Hugo de Bingham and John de Cruce i, (Hug Painels) released, Rad Musard 15, Robert de Chauces i, Com de Ferrars 68^, Wm. Briwere I in Chesterfield, and 10 of Roger Buron, Wm. Albini 2, John de Bassingburn ^^42 los. for the farm of Tichill. pipe mo. 01, r. 2—17 5obn anD l Ibenrg iii. Philip Marc, sheriff, £isg 12s. iid. bl. for the farm of the county for half of the 17th John, and ;^20 Ss. tale. Allowed expenses of John Vivarii, with 5 boys (garconibus) and 1 1 horses, and 9 greyhounds (leporar), and 24 wolf hounds, hunting for 63 days, £6 6s. Allowed in expenses Roger de Millers, with 4 hawkers, and in expenses with the king with Adam his keeper (fcustode), and in expenses of the king with 2 horses and many hounds, and in expenses of Robert, the fisherman of the king, and with 2 other fishermen, and in expenses of Magister William Engeleis with his horse and servants, and in the expense of Rad Russel, and the keeping of 6 Ger falcons with horse, and in the expenses of Richard de Brademer and Richard Pincun, the king's hunters (Venatores), with the hounds of the king coming to the Pare many times, £48 16s. iid. And in lands given to Peter de Derbi, 6s. 8d. and 4 bovates. Will fil Galfry 1. s. in Chelardeston. Will St. Michael. The farm of the land of Rad Laverd and 6d. for Godfrey de Spigurnal, 3d. for the farm of the land of John de Brun. Brian de Insula accounts for the farm of Bolsover; Robt. de Laxington for him. Thomas Esquire 22s. 6d. in Tideswell. THE PIPE ROLLS. 183 The remainder of the rents of Wenuwin ;^io. Hugh de Claworth for his service. Rad Tisun. Magr Roger de Insula. BMpe IR0. 62—2 ibenrs ill. NO ROLL FOR NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. IPipe iRo. 63, r. 8.-3 ibenrs ni. Philip Marc, sheriff, ;^si8 us. lod. bl. for the farm of the past year'and the present. In Snottington £\6, for which Wm. Briwere should respond ; and in Chesterfield, with its soke, £,26 8s. Wm. de Albini ;^S2 in Oskinton. Edwin de Haia de Birchwood. Roger de Lanum in Tilne. Henry Corban in Derleton. Marine, wife of Robert fil Hugh, 78s. 8d. in Wateley. Gerard de Barre £,\6 i m. in Carlton. Nicol Pincerna had Wadhouse and Warsop, of the gift of King John. Magr Alan de Bolsover and Philip de Ulecotes in Oswardebec. Works at Nottingham Castle p. visu Wm. le Corner and Ingelram fil Hacon. Rad de Hauville and Galf Thomas de Weston Falconer. The burgh of Derby owed £,1"] /s. Qd. for the farm of the town for the half-year. The heirs of Peter de Sandiacre in Lutchurch. The men of Nottingham ;^25 19s. gd. for their farm for half a year. Hugo de Nevil, Wm. de Mandeville, Com Essex, the farm of Dunham, and 5 m. in respect of the farm of Chesterfield ; Philip Mimekin for Carlton and Derleton. Robert de Vipont ;^440 and c. s. per John de Builli for the 7th scutage, Nigel Luvetot. 1 84 THE PIPE ROLLS. Gervase fil Richard de Wiverton £io6 for the. debt of Aaron, Wm. de Lech, John, his son, Wm. de St. Michael, Richard Flanders, Peter fil Peter Picot 63 m. 4s. 8d. for having his father's lands. Robert de Albini owes ;^iO 8s. for the misericordia of the forest. (See Southampton, of which the Bishop of Lincoln ought to free him.) Philip Marc 20 m. for having the marriage of Nigel fil Oliver de Langford, Gervase de Clifton 3 m. G. fil Peter 2| m. for having the land and inheritance of Walter de Strelly, of which Philip de Strelly should acquit him according to the warranty which Hugo fil Roger, his senescal, acknowledges ; Galfr de Pavelli, Hubert fil Ralf, heirs of Doun Bardolf NEW OBLATIONS. Robert de Aincourt and Havis, his wife, v. Rad de Gousel and Walter his son. John fil Wm. de Lech 30 m. and i palfry for release from all transgressions, and for the debts of his father, etc. Wm. de Sutton i m. for writ concerning i mill in Radford. Thomas Basset v. Yvo de Dien. Wm. fil Ralf de Lavered de Sibtorp 40s. for his land as heir to his father. Wm. de Stokes owes c. s. because the house of Maurice de Audeley in Middleton, whose land the said Wm. had by the gift of King John, was burnt, and because it was done by his consent. Wm. de Harestan ; Hy. fil Leverhard, p. pi. Robert his brother. Matilde de Kaus 60 m. for having her land, with its appur- tenances. Hugo fil William the land of Hucknal and the mill of Radford. Robert de Kalsovere owes i m. for having the writ of Pone v. Roger fil Stephen for the land of Watenou. Robert de Chevercourt v. Alexander de Cortinstock for restoring the custody of the land and heir of Wm. de Boves. Hy. de Buron 10 m. v. Walter Malet. Rad de Crubwell v. Yvo de Heriz for the land of Widmerpol. Simon de St. Mauro p. pledge Mathew de Bixcrop. a THE PIPE ROLLS. , 185 Rich fil Herbert p. p]. William le Herburer and Rad fil Erneis, Will Spickfat, Robt. de Hargrave. Robert Bussel v. John Maillard. Thorn fil Rann, Walter ad Monte, Rd. Walenses, Swan fil Gumbald v. John fil Thoke. Robt. fil Robt. de Wallegh 20 m. for having the charter of King John. Gervase de SumerviUe 6 palfreys for having seizin of one knight's fee in Oxton, Emingham, and Claxby, which he claims as his right and inheritance, which was Robert de Somerville's ; Robt. de Lysures, Thom Sampson, Robt de Crubwell, ail fined for the same inheritance. Henry fil Ernald, Robt. de Calfour. ^be 1st Scutage of Iking Ibenri? iii. asseseeb at 2 marcs. Hubert fil Rad 15 fees, Emma de Bellofago i, Hubert de Burgo 25 of the heirs of Doun Bardolf Hugo de Bingham i, Rad Musard, 30 m. for 15 fees, Wm. Briwere 20 m. for 10 fees which were Roger de Buron's, Com de Ferrar 68J, Wm. de Albini 2, Robert de Kacurcis i, John de Aincourt, Rad de Willoughby in Glapwell, Wm. de Vnon, Will Basset, Henry de Grey, Ivo de Heriz. (This roll is mutilated so that part only can be given.) Heirs Hugo de Insula 6 m. for 3 fees. Wm. de Vnon \, John de Monteacuto i, Galf de Pavelli 4, Peter Goldington 4, Galf de Sacville i, Wm. Avenel i, Barrabas de Hertwell i, Gerard de Rhodes 2 m. for i fee, Wm. Hosatus i, Robert de Hese i, Robert de la Saucer i, Hugo de Nevill i, Henry de Grai i, Ivo de Heriz 3, The Earl of Ferrars i, Robert Almaric i, Hospitallers i, Hugh de Haversham i. Wills de Duston I, Wm. fil Robert de Essibi 3, the Hon. of Peverel 64 \ yL Robert Level 3 m. de Honour Tichill. pipe IRo. 64, r. 11-4 Ibenr? ill. Philip Marc, sheriff. Accounted for .^279 5s. iid. bl and ^^40 los. tale of the farm of the County. 25 1 86 THE PIPE ROLLS. Richard fil Peter de Sandiacre. Robert de Chauces. William de Cante. Allowed the expenses of Gilbert de Hauvill with Blackman gerfalconer going to the king from Nottingham to the parts of Gloucester 4 m., and for the expenses of Thomas de Weston with gerfalconer and 3 greyhounds (leporiis), I horse and I garcon for 252 days, at g^d. per day, £g 19s. 6d., and in operations upon the king's mill below the rock of the Castle of Nottingham, in the 4th year of the king, £21 i8s. 6d., and in repairing the great pool and mill of Clipston, and in the paiUngs (palicio) around the house of the king there, £y 6s. 8d. And in paying Magisters Thom, Robt., and Brunei, the king's carpenters, £41 17s. And in expenses Gilbert de Hauvill and three running boys (vadletor pendinantiu) at Nottingham with 5 horses for search- ing for Blackmann, the king's gerfalconer, 15 days, and i robe for the use of the said Gilbert, £^4 13s. id. Gervase de Clifton 3 m. for false pleading. Ralf de Gresley and Ysabelle his wife c. £, for land of Robert, father of Isabelle. Alina, widow of Robert fil Walkelin, 30 m. and i palf for her dower. NEW OBLATIONS. Robert de Everingham sued Wm. fil Ralf concerning a tenement in North Leirton. Walter de Stanton sued the Prior of Selford to warrant land in Crophill. Matilde de Kaus paid 80 m. for having seizin of the custody of the Forests of the Counties of Nottingham and Derby, which belonged to her by hereditary right. Henry de Bailloll 2 m. for disseizin Wm. de Bassett £2$ los. for land. See Roll for Lincolnshire. AMERCIAMENTS. The goods of fugitives, etc., realised : Reg. fil Richard 25s., Warin de Clifton, Osbert de Eicring, who abjured the realm, _^J Robert Scacheloc, Henry fil Ralf Wm. Foliot de Stokes for the flight of Wm. de Stokes, Elias de Martin, Robt. fil Cap, Alan fil Gilbert, Robert de Mora, Hugo fil Reginald de Etton. # THE PIPE ROLLS. 1 87 Fines : Rich de Wishou, Robert fil Richard and Hugh fil Robert, Adam Gosling, Elias de Buell, constable of Tickenhal, Laurence de Trou, Will de Buell, Ade de Claworde, Robt. fil Hugh de Radford, Hear de Rednes, Gilbert de Grava, Wm. fil Eudo, Rad fil Ascer, Rich le Herre | m.. Rich Dubleserjeant, Will Arnhall, Reg Bassett, Galf de Sumerville 5 m. for disseizin Eustace de Mortain, Wm. fil Richard de Langar, Rich de Turri, Hugo fil Germani, Wm. fil Arnulf, Johes Clarel, Roger de Bel- toft, Rich fil Ketelbin, Alexander de Cortingstock, Adam pro- positus de Snoington, Jordan fil Walter de eadem, Herbert fil Adam de ead, Hugo de Etton, John fil Richard de Holme. ptpe mo. 65, r. 5—5 Ibenrg ill. Philip Marc, sheriff. In expenses of Ric Pinzun, the hunter, with his horses and hounds, taking lo fallow deer in Sherwood (ten days), i8s. 4d. Wm. de Cantelupe owes 19 m. for the fees of Leonia de Stuteville. Roger Montbegon ;£iS5 i6s. for the Manor of Oswardebec for 4 years. AMERCIAMENTS. The goods of Henr fil Ralf, Elia de Marteinni, Robert de Mora, Ad GozeHng, Hugh fil Reg, Roger de Beautoft, Adam fil Magge de Mapelton, Robt. fil Colling, Robt. le Worm. The Prior of Shelford accounted for 25 m. for Matilde de Kaus. The County of Derby, except fees which were Leonia de Stuteville's, of her own demesne, and Oliver de Aincourt, Margaret fil Henr de Paddeley. Fug. : John fil Nic, Wm. de Lindsey, Wm. Bruin Nic Pro- positus, Rich fil Hugh and Rad his son, de Pentr, Roger de Bramley, Galf de Ravenstone, Wm. de Chaddesdon, Salom de Burgo, Roger de Mapley, Wm. Sturch de Tibshelf, Wm. Pistor of Essover, Deine Bercarii de Barlbro, Rich de Heriz de Winfield. Agn de Langle sues Rich del Hill. l88 THE PIPE ROLLS. Fines : Wills de Stanley owes half a marc for a plea, John fil Walter, Nic de Wilington, Cecil de Hulton, Rad fil Erneis concord with Hubert fil Rad, Herbert See Ailmo de Dunestan, Robt. de Bircheved, Peter fil Alexr., Ad de Langtoft, Will fil Willi de Brunton, ,Roger Deincourt de Morton, Rad de Willoughby in Essover, Robert Callal p. pi, Robert de Wetecesft 17 m. of Ivone de Heriz p. disseizin ^ m. de frankpledge of Winnefield by the flight of Ric de Heriz, Alex de Birchwood 20s. Robert de Briminton per disseizin, Wm. Kaskin, Wm. fil Herbert de Cestrefeld, Wm. Carettar, Reingod Serjeant, Prior de Sepling- ham, Rog fil Galfry, Robt. de Ybule. Excused Wm. Briwere for his good and faithful services, and his office fresidentia) at the Exchequer, 43 m. and \. NEW OBLATIONS. Brian Vintner of Nottm, Thorn de Lauum 5 m. for having seizin of 4 marcs rent which was in Tilney and mill in Tilne which Roger de Lanum his father held of the gift of King John, Rad de Wudburg in Eperston, Gervase de Somvill 10 m. for diss., Matilde de Kalcet Henr Gernun 6is. for pannage and agistment in the forests of Nottingham, Walter de Estweit, Tom de Muscamp, Hy. de Rolleston, Godfrey de Andegav, Wm. le Macun de Derby, Roger le Poheir, Laurence de Croy, Richard de St. Patric. ffi)ipe no. 66, r. 3—6 ibenrs iii. Philip Marc, sheriff. Gervase de Clifton 3 m. for bad pleading ; Roger fil Roger, Henr de Rednes, Rad de Willoughby, Rad de Normanville, Gerald his son. NEW OBLATIONS. Robert de Touke i marc for a pone concerning Henry de Touke, of the land in Kelum. Robert Maluvel i m. for having pone against Roger Maluvel and others in Ramton, Gerard de Mering, Ralf de Rodes c. s. for his relief for i knight's fee of the Honour of Peverel. THE PIPE ROLLS. 189 Wm. de Badelsmar, kt., Robt Maluvel, Robert fil William de Auferton 60 m. for the king's benevolence, Walter de Stanton, Yvo de Heriz, Robert de Harestan, Willo le Chien, Wm. de Eyneford, Nicola de Haya. And in the custody of the Propositus, taking to London Galfr, prover of robbery, with other provers. Gvas de Somerville, Robt. de Lisures. Galf de Nevil 45 m. of 200 m. which the king promised to free him by his Letters Patent sealed with his private seal. Iptipe mo. 67, r. 2—7 Ibenrs III. Philip Marc, sheriff. OF OBLATIONS. Thos. Dispens, John de Lee, Will de Stanton, Robt. de Walleia, Thomas Basset. Matilde de Chauz 50 m. for having seizin as in Roll 3. NEW OBLATIONS. Eustace fil and heir Eustace de Moreton 15 m. and i palfry for his relief for the lands which the king holds. Fines : Prior of Schelford concord with Richard de Buron and Ralf fil Robert, Tom de Sandal concord with Matilde, widow of Galfry, Richard de Cama with Gaufry de Ecleston, Nic de Willeton. Robert Salicet 10 m. for his relief for i knight's fee which was Robert his father's. Brian de Insula ;£SO for the farm of Peak and Bolsover for the half-year, the king having leased them to him for i^'ioo a year during his pleasure ; heirs of Will de St. Michael and Walter Croc. Ipipe IR0U mo. 68, r. 16.-8 Ibenri? ill. Philip Marc, sheriff. Ysolda de Gray | m. for her house, which she lost by mis- chance (p. forsatu). John fil Wm. fil Galfry, in land given in Chelardeston. igo THE PIPE ROLLS. OBLATIONS. John de Birkin answers for 3 marks for Matilde de Caus. Rich le Herre, Robt. de Toke, Will Boetes. Eustace fil Eustace de Moreton. Robert de Muscamp for the fee of the Archbishop of York. NEW OBLATIONS. Henry de Bucton i m. for a writ, Roger le Breton owes ;£^iO for his relief, and for having seizin of one knight's fee, with its appurts., in Waleton, by the pledge of Reg de Cardoil, 3 m. ; Walter de Estweit 2 m.. Thorn de Heanor 2 m., Elye de Martenai 2 m., Robert de Dun 6 m. Richard fil Henry summoned by the Prior of Karleton to warrant land in Sutton. Galf de Eccleston ;^io for having seizin of the land which Avice, widow of Richard de Cama, held in Stapleford. John de Birkin 300 m. for his relief for the land of Matilde de Caus, and for having likewise the custody of the forests of Nottingham and Derby ; Rich Burnet, Matilde de Luvetot, Alan Malet, Wm. de Radclive, Roger Beltott, John Hatell, and Stephen Meverel. The sheriff to hold inquisition between Ivo de Heriz and Rad Cromwell. Wm. fil Daniel Pincerna 15 m. for having seizin of his mill at Wormhill, which King John gave by his charter to Daniel his father. Scutage be fIDontgomcri? at 2 marfts. Hubert fil Ralf 30 m. Robert de Chances 2 Matilde de Caus 24 m. (An entry just above shows that she was dead, John de Birkin paying his relief for her lands.) The following are excused : — Emma de Belfou i Wm. de Bardolf 25 Ric. de Lettris i Rad de Musard 15 fees. THE PIPE ROLLS. • 191 Wm. Briwere 10 (Roger Burons). The Earl Ferrars 68| Wm. de Aubeneio 2 m. Oskinton and Stokes. (Orston in Notts, and Stokes in Northn., both held by Wm. Albini of Belvoir. Ch. Antiq.. A. A. 61.) Comes de Waren 1 5 Leonia de Stuteville. Roger de Monte (begonis) in Oswaldebec. Hon. of Peverel. The following accounted : Wm. de Ferrars 200 m. for having custody of the land of Cecile de Langetoft, with the marriage of her heir ; by the pledge of the Earl of Ferrars 40 m., the Earl of Chester 40 m., the Earl of Mandeville 20 m., Wm. Briwere 30 m., the Bishop of Exeter 10 m., . . . 30 m., Robert de Ferrars 15 m., Ralf fil Nicolas 15 m. John de Aincourt J fee 1 m. Wm. de Vernon 3 m. Wm. de Basset 2 m. Eustace de Moreton 6 m. Robert Brito 2 The sheriff accounts for : Ralf fil Robert, in Sibtot - J ■ Gervase de Wiverton i Philip de Kime, in Bilburc, and Richard de Stapleford i Ralph de Normanville 4 m. Rad de Gresley 6 m. Wm. de St. Patric - 6 Galf de Pavelli 8 Wm. de Cantelupe, for the heir of Hugo de Insula 6 m. Peter de Goldington 8 m. Wm. de Avenel 3 m- Wm. fil Robert de Essibi 6 Ralf de Wileweby, in Glapwell i m. Walter de Strelley 2 m. John de Monteacuto 2 Gauf de Sackville 2 192 THE PIPE ROLLS. Barnabas de Hertwell Robert de Hese Robert de la Saucer Hugo de Nevil Torenden in Essex. Gerard de Rhodes Robert de Amaur The Hospitallers Hugo de Haversham Wm. de Dufton Robert de Hese 2 2 2 m. 2 m. for I fee in 2 2 2 m. I fee in Blacol- vesle. 2 2 (Answers in Northampton- shire.) 2 m. for I fee, which was Robert de Capon's in Burton, of the Hon. of Peverel. Acquitted : Robert fil Wm. de Alfreton Peter de Vadis 3f. I fee in Kinewalder- mers. 6 4 which were formerly Ysolda de Gray Yvo de Heriz John de Bellocampo. The Earl of Ferrars, fee in Hecham, 3h fees. Robert de Lexington ^106 for the farm of High Peak, and for 30 caretates of lead bought for the use of the king's castle of Dover. Scutage of Bebforb assesset) at 2 marce. Robert Chaucis and Emma Belfou excused by writ of the king. Hubert fil Ralf, John de Birkin, Wm. Bardolf, Nic de Lectris, Rad Musard, Wm. Briwere, Wm. de Albini, Com de Waren, Roger de Montbegon, Comtissa de Auge, of the Honour of Tickill, i.e., of 6o| fees and 4 parts of i. Wm. Briwere, senr., as custos of Lawrence de Burton, ;^20 of the rents of Bolsover. For the carriage of 21 tuns (dolior) of wine from Blie to Nottingham 3| m., and in conducting 18 carriages, for carrying the carcases of 96I- oxen and c. sheep (multonum), and 3 braonum 30s. THE PIPE ROLLS. 193 IPipe mo. 69, r. 7.-9 ibenrg III. Ralf fil Nicol, as custos. PLEAS OF THE FOREST. Nicol de Duredene, Hugo fil Edward de Sutton, Robt. de Wyroc, Henr de Stavensby, Roger de Norfolk, Hugo de Malere, Adam le Wyne, Henr de Cheddesdon, Rich fil Swan, Henr Cap de Bratington, Thos. Cellario de Worksop, Robt. de Bella Aqua, Adam de Kilburn, Rog de Plumbariis, Rad de Morley, Galf Blund, Wm. fil Robert de Stanl owes I2d. for default, Hugo de Newton Forester, Walter Textor de Birchwood, Hugo fil Philip de Derby, Galf Cap de Alfreton, Alexr. fil Rad de Halum, Adam fil Hugo de Tickeshill, Walter fil Walter de Newton, Rich Loftsco, Hugo de Wermundsworth, Walter de Bigging, Osmund's assart in Bradeshall, Roger fil Orm, Rad de Wudburc, Robert de Crois, Rad fil Rad de Sumcot, Robert Molendinar de Auferton, Roger de Auferton, Roger Colling, Hugo de Wermodesworde for land in Cotgrave. Will fil Liolf,Tom Barre, Wm. de Wichenore, Hugo fil Ascelot, John Lgrant, Roger Knotting, Tom de Stretton, Wills fil Hubert, Andr de Riparia, Rob de Maluvel de Repton sued Robt. Maluvel de Roclaveston. Peter de Hereford sued Martin de Bukebridge. NEW OBLATIONS. Walter Malet 3 m. for assize mort ancestor, concerning Horsley. Thorn de Haidon (Hedon) 1. m. for having the custody of the heir of Peter Picot ; Roger fil Alexander, John de Heriz paid ;^20 for his rehef; Henry de Buron, assize mort ancestor against Walter Malet for land in Cotgrave. OF THE IMBLADEMENTS OF THE SAME ITINERARY. Stephen Mevel and Alice de Lochelegh i m. for tenement in Leke. Wm. Briwere for the farm of Bolsover for the whole year (no account of it). 26 194 THE PIPE ROLLS. pipe mo. 70, r. II —10 ibenrs ill. Rad fil Nicolas, sheriff. Wm. de Hardreshill and for carriage of ID tons of wine from Lincoln to Nottingham, replacing in the Castle of Nottingham, and in packing (carcag), and unpacking (discarcag) the same 42s. ; 6d. for the land of John de Buron, Jordan fil William de Apetot. Walter de Godardsvill owes cc. m. for having Johanna to wife as mentioned in rollS. Will. Briwere, senr., ought to answer for the farm of Bolsover for the whole of the 9th year ; Robert de Tatersall for half a year after that Robert de Lancaster demised it. NEW OBLATIONS. Ralf Musard 1 5 m. for having the land which was Walter de Godardsvill's and Johanna, his wife, sister of Isabelle, wife of the said Ralf, and of whom the said Isabelle was next heir when the king took the homage of the said Ralf, and conceded by this fine that he should have seizin of the said land, by the pledge of Wm. de Meisnel 3 m. ; Hy. de Cubbele 3 m., Roger fil Propositus 3, Roger Parmeter 2 m., Wm. fil Hugh 2 m., and John de Bosco 2 m. Robert de Hardreshill 40s. for his relief, and for having the land which William, his father, held of the king in capite in Claworth, of which he was the next heir, for which land the king took his homage and the pledge of Walter de Claworth, Adam fil John de Claworth, Wm. de Aulam, John fil Alexander. The Abott of Burton sued Thomas Tucket, and Nic. Wileton. Prior of Rependon owed half a marc foe licence of concord with Nic. de Wilinton ; Amaure de Norse ^ m. for concord with Elias de Amundeville ; Robert de Acour concord with Loedgar de Diva. Hugo de Bel (of the Pleas of Hugo de Neville) answers for 3! of land and assarts cultivated in the bounds of Buiseil in the field of Nottingham, near Tickill, and in Foxholes, at lod. rent ; Hy. fil Rich. THE PIPE ROLLS. 195 AMERCIAMENTS BY R. DE LEXINGTON. Henr de Bucton, Roger fil Alexander, Robert fil Wil- liam de Hareston, Robert de Villiers, Roger fil Alexander, Robt de Carleol, Rad de Gresley, Ric Blund, Magr. Stephen de Radclive. The following were hung (suspensi) : Rich de Bardslaw, Roger Faber, Rich fil Thos de Benteshill, Gilbert Trutt, Rich Godpurs, Hereb de Roby. Fines: Robt fil Galf and Robert fil Robert sue Hugo de Strelly ; Reginald Marc pledges Peter and Galf Gyun, Rad de St. Paulo. Roger fil Gunild, Galf de Akover, Ralf fil Thos. de Turlaves- ton, Arnold de Winfield, Thos fil Thorn de Wilfront, Robt Walens, outlaw, Robert de Kelesholt, Hugo de Hill, Ralf fil Nic, Robert fil Fulc, Hy. Cemiter, Galf Scot, outlaw of Screveton, Wm. and Alan Malet, Herbert de Roby, Wm. fil Lefwine, Hy. Kidenwalde, Hy. fil Matilde, Hy. de Wallegh, Hy. de Clyve, Stephen fil John and John Rudde, Unfred de Ocleton, and Wm., his brother, Adam fil Ralf and Roger, his brother. ptpe mo. 7l.-lt Ibenrg III. NO NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY THIS YEAR. pipe mo. 72, r. 13.-12 Ibenrg ill. R. FIL NIC, sheriff; HUGO LE Bel for him. Mathew de Hathersage and Alicia de Criddeling 200 m. for having seizin of the land which was Isabella Meisnill's, cousin of the said Mathew and Alice, which was held of the king in capite. Oliver de Aincourt owes ;^I4 and i m. of the first scutage of Lincoln. Aumerico de Nuers. NEW OBLATIONS. The sheriff accounts for £21 3s. 4^d. for the rents of Kirkby, Ekinton, Barton, and Bradmer of John de Stuteville for the 196 THE PIPE ROLLS. term of St. Martin in the year 12 while they were in the king's hands. Ralf fil Nicolas c. £ for having the custody of the same lands. The said John de Stuteville accounts for 200 m. for having his lands in England. Ralf fil Nicolas, c. £ for having the custody of the land and heir of Robert fil William ; Godfrey Spignel for having the king's charter concerning the customs and services of men of Skegbi. Ranulf Brito 5 m. for having custody of the land and heir of Roger de Brunesleia, with the marriage of the same heir. Tom de Birkin, son and heir of John de Birkin, 200 m. for having seizin of the land of the said John, with the cu.stody (bailia) of the forest of Sherwood. Hugo fil Rad and Agnes, his wife, daughter and heir of Rad de Gresley, accounted for ;£lS for her relief for 3 fees which the said Rad de Gresley held of the Honour of Peverel of Not- tingham. FINES, ETC., PER ROBERT DE LAXINGTON. Robert de Stanton, Wm. Palmer, Regl de Saulm, John fil Nicol, John de Esseburn, Hugo fil Hugo, Tom Tucket, Robert de Bella Aqua, John de Heriz, Rad de Gresley, Rich de Wivton, Regin Marc, Robt. de Rolveston, Walter Tinctor, Rich fil Rich, John fil Gilbert, Hugo fil Alexr, Wm. de Pikhall, Robert de Pec, Galf Extraneos, Reginl de Saulm, Robert Brien, John Birkin, Philip de Stradlega, Henry fil Rich, Robt. de Laxinton, Lancelot de Stoke, Robert de Calfoar, Robt. Greencertel, Jordan de Sterndale, Wm. Grim, Willo Besant, Gilbert Palmer, Robert de Witefield, Walter fil Laur, Robt. Aldewic, Ric Peche, John de Birchover, Mathw de Langdon, Robt. fil Salot, Robert fil Willi, Will Venator, Rich de Ennesore. pipe IRo. 73, r. 5.-13 Ibenri? III. Ralf fil Nic, Hugo le Bel, as custos. Alexander fil Ralf de Halum. Fines : Rich de Wivton, Robt. de Rolveston, Waltr Tinctor, Hugh fil Alexander, Augustine le Corner, Will le Corner, Will THE PIPE ROLLS. 1 97 fil Roger, Rich Galet, Rad fil Nicol, Robert de Stokes, Robert de Staunton, John fil Nicol and Wm. de Cambray, Roger fil Alkel and Emma, his wife, p. pi. Roger de Brunesley, Uctred fil Nicol, Nigel fil Ulkil, Agnes, wife of Robert fil Toli, Nic de Ette- well, Henry fil Rann de Wyrelaig, Gilbert Pa(rson) de Flintham, Magister Stephen de Ratclive, Roger fil Robert de Sireston, Jacob fil Gilbert, Wm. fil Reginald de Uvetorp and Galfry his brother, Robt Corvaserius de Esseburn, Martin fil William and Cecil his wife, Augustine fil William of Nottingham, Rad de Welton, Rad Champeneis, Hugo de Edricksei, Robert le Chapman, Richard Builli and Augustine le Corner, Robert Verd and Rich de Carlton, Wm. Godhe and Adam Ruffus, Robert Maluval de Ramton, Tom de Sterton. PLEAS OF THE FOREST. Rad de Wyuby, Henry cleric de Egmanton, Hugo de Weston, Henry de Rolleston, Rad Hardi de Saldeford, Adam de Wudhouse, Rich fil Engeram, Rich de Sumvill de Blackwell, Robt. Filbi de Spondon, Walter Forestar de Newton, William de Tideswell, Reginald Marc, Roger de Havershegg, Gilbt de Merston, Will de Essartis, Will Palmius, Alex de Lustreshal, Galf fil Robert, Wm. de Deneby, Robt de Ponte, Roger de Paris. Margaret, widow of Wynonewyn, owes ;^30 for the farm of two parts of the manor of Ashford. NEW OBLATIONS. Rad fil Nicol 40 m. for the fine he made with the executors of the will of G., formerly Bishop of London, and for having the daughter of Ralf de Lymesy, who was in the custody of the said bishop. Jordan Foliot, Wm. Briwere 5 m. because he did not prosecute. Scutage of Ikcrri?, as6C60e& at 2 marce, (The names in brackets indicate the former tenants ; in the roll, the name of the new tenant is written above the old one.) William (Richard fil Robert) de Sibetoft J m. for i fee. Richard (Gervase) de Wiverton - i igS THE PIPE ROLLS. John de Aincourt 1 Robert (Walter) de Strelly I Ralf de Wileby i Galf de Eccleston (Richard de Stapelford) I Walter (Barrabas) de Hertwell I Wm. Hose I Nicolas Abbas (Ralf de Normanville) 2 Hugh de Haversham I Hugh fil Ralf (Rad de Gresley) - 3 Robert (Galf) de Pavell 4 Wm. Basset- - ^ John de Heriz 4 Eustace de Morton 3 Philip (Simon) de Kime i John de Montecute I Wm. de St. Patric 3 Galf de Sakeville I Wm. de St. Patric 3 Galf de Sakeville I The Hospitallers I fee in Blackolv Robert de Essebi 3 Peter de Vadis Philip de Ulecote ■i^ John de Nevill Robert de Hese I fee. Hugo de Nevill - - I Bolsover - - 5 m. for 2j f Will de Dufton I Emma de Belfou I Will de Vernon H Robert Aumary I John de Stotville - 30 m. for 15 fees. Will de Albini 2 fees. Rad de Freshville (Hubert fil Ralf) - 30 for 1 5 fees. Wm. de Cressi ;£'iO Tom de Muschams Robert de Chaucis 42s. 8d. Ralf Willebi 4 m. and 4d. Robt. de Sandesbi 2 m. Tom de Birkin The following were excused : Hugo de Gresley 3 m., Simon THE PIPE ROLLS. iqc) de Kime los., Ralf fil Nicolas, Robert fil Will, John de Bello- campo, Peter de Goldington, Wm. de Cantelupe, Hug de Insula, Reginald de Mendre, Henr. Toueton, Robert de la Saucy, Com de Ferrar one fee in Heyham, Roger Brito i fee, William Bardolf 25 f, Nicolas de Lettres [ fee, Ralf Musard 15 f, Robert de Chauces i fee. Com de Ferrar 68i, Wm. Briwere 3 f in Cestfield and of 20 fees of Roger de Buron. Robert fil William de Berkley in Childcot. Richard de Grey had the daughter and heir of John de Humage in marriage. Countess Augi I2i m. for 60 fees, 3 parts I f of the fee of Tickill ; Robert de Wulrington 2 parts of i fee ; Hugo de Buell I fee. pipe no, 74—14 ibenrs III. Rad fil Nic, sheriff; HUGO LE Bell for him. Wm. Briwere £8 in Sneinton, 4s. in Chesterfield. Marine ux. Robert fil Hugh 37s. 4.6. in Claworde for dower ; Richard de Hardreshill, 74s. 66. in Claworde. Robert Colle de Halum, Henr. de Bond, Will fil Will de Ufreshedon, Rad Clement, Rich Finch, Step de Sxelchaddon, Passe de Albeneye ^ m. p. pi. presentation, Launcelin de Stoke for the same, Walter fil John Propositus of Colingham, Walto fil Richard, Wm. Barun de Basford, Galf Gyun 40s. for the king's pare invaded, John de Anesley and Rad de Ernhale owe 6d. for one acre in Lindeby, Ralf fil Durand in Gedling, Rich de Ponte de Colingham, Henr. de Bucstanes, Alan de Weytigton, Milo the Miller, Roger de Hilton in Cliston, Henr. fil Simon de Sepesheved, Step fil Walter de Newigton, Nigel de Luvetot, Roger de Vilers, Rad de St. Gorge, Jord de Berneval, (John) Ivo de Heriz, Hugo de Stanton, Leon de Manuovers, Engram de Ulecot, Peter de Crogan, Galfr Luterel, Adam Manway, Robert de Cressi, Matilde de Luvetot, Wm. Peverel owes 20s., Will de Wellbeof, Robert de Ferrars. NEW OBLATIONS. Barnabe de Hertwell. (See Bucks.) Gervase de Arnhal 5 m. for having the king's confirmation of 200 TUB PIPE ROLLS. 2 bovates of land, and of 2 tofts in Arnhale, which Hugh de Neve gave to him. Olivia de Montebegonis. Brian de Insula the king's charter concerning Kingshay. OF THE FINES AND SCUTAGE OF THE FIRST PASSAGE OF THE KING INTO BRITTANIA, ASSESSED AT THREE MARCS. John de Aincourt i, Galf de Eccleston i, Olivia de Monte- begonis 2i, Robert de Strelly i, Will fil Ralf de Sibthorp ^, Gervase de Wiverton i, Wm. Basset i fee, Adam de Credling |, Rad de Frexenville 15s., Rad de Wyleb | f., Walter de Hertwell I fee (Barrab), Wills Hose i, Hugh de Haversham i, John de Monteacuto i fee, Wm. de St. Patric 3, Galf de Saukville i. Hospitallers in Blackolvesly i, John de Bellocampo i|, and -^ Peter de Vadis, i Philip de Ulecot, John de Neville ^, Robert de Hese i in Berton, Hugo de Nevil i, Robert fil Aumar i, Dominium de Bolsover 24, Wm. de Duston i, Rad de Norman- ville, Rad de Rodes d m. for 2 fees and for having his scutage, of which the Bishop of Carl ought to acquit him. The following were excused : Walter de Hertwell i fee of Barrab, Galf de Eccleston i fee of Richard de Stapelford, Hugh fil Rad de Gresley 3 fees, Rob. de Pavelly 4 f , John de Heriz 4 f , Eustace de Morton 3 f., Philip de Kime J fee, Rad fil Nic 3 f., Robt. fil Wm., Peter de Goldington 4 fees, Wm. de Cantelupe 3 fees of Hugo de Insula, Reg. de Mendre 6 fees of Henry de Grey, Robert de la Saucey (who made fine in Northampton) i. Com de Ferrars i fee in Heyam, Roger Brito i fee, Robt. de Essebi 3, Emma de Bellafago I. John de Stuteville accounted for ;^5o for 15 fees and that he should not cross over ; Ralf Musard ;^30 and 1 5 fees, Robt. de Chawarces 40s. for i. Excused : Wm. de Albin 2 fees, Wm. Bardolf 25, Nicol de Lettres i. Com de Ferrars 681, Wm. Briwere 3 fees Chesterfield, and 10 f of Roger Buron, Tom Birkin 12 fees, Will de Derby, Robert de Derby, Philip de Scatton, John Hally 4s. of Robert the Archer. THE PIPE ROLLS. 20I AMERCIAMENTS BY THE CHANCELLOR AND S. DE SEGRAVE. Sams de Leke, Wm. fil Walter de Nottingham, Wm. de Aide- word, Reg. de Saumour, Rad fil Nicolas i8s. of the goods of Hugh Columbel, Almaric le Boteler, Adam fil Wm. and Henr. de Grave, Henr. Pape de Magnahora and Walkelin fil Reg. de Faume, Mathew de Sandiacre, John de Radclive, Marg. de Draicot, Unfredus the Fisherman of Nottingham, Rich de Plumtree of Nottingham. The sheriff accounts for 60s. the goods of Robert de Meynil, Roger fil Lionis, Hugo de Morle, Robt. de Langthwaite living in Suleholm, Manesser fil Milo the Jew, Peytevin le Grant of Lincoln, Malversin de Herecy, Peter de Rulhall. Cecilia de Sumerville, Roger de Derby, John de Lungvilers, Hugh fil Seward, Robert fil Regin., Robt. Silverspon, Robt. de Colingham, Will de Pikehall, Robt. de Brunesley, Isolde de Vilers and Sibel her sister, William fil Will de Hickling, Wm. fil Gervas, Robt. de Tatersal had the farm of Bolsover, Wm. Surl Vintnor. Ralf Rhodes accounted for 40 m. for assarts, as per Roll 7, for his land and liberties. John fil Wm. de Chelardeston. pipe iFlo. 75.-15 ibenrs in. Ralf fil Nicolas, sheriff. (Peter) William de Chaddesden, Leveneth de Westhalum, Alan de Wytenton, Roger de Vilers, William de Chawarcis, John de Holen, Philip de Strelly, John Thorcard, Hugo fil Coste de Hucenal, Reginald de Cholwic, Godfr Barry, Hugh de Gresley, Robert de Pavelli, John de Heriz, Philip de Kime. UMpe no. 76— le ibenrg in. Ralf fil Nic, sheriff ; HUGH DE Beel, for him. John Wascelin in Carlton in Lindric. Robert Cormesyes de Esseburn. Wm. de Scroby, Thorn Hanselin. 27 202 THE PIPE ROLLS. Scutage of lEIva^ne, asscsseb at 2O0. THE HONOUR OF PEVEREL. Wm. fil Robert de Sibthorpe J fee. Rich de Wiverton 5 John de Aincourt ^ Rad de Willougby | Nic le Abbe 2 Galf de Eccleston (Richard de Stapelford) i Walter (Barnab) de Hertwell - i Wm. Hose i Hugo de Haversham i John de Monteacuto i Wm. de St. Patric 3 Gauf de Sacville I The Hospitallers in Blacholvesly i John de Bellocampo i| Peter de Goldington 4 Regin de Mendre, £6 6s and yV of i of Henry de Grey of Toveton. Robert de Salceto i Peter de Vadis \ Philip de Ulecot John de Nevil \ Robert de Hese \ Robert Aumary i The demesne of Bolsover 2-i Will de Duston - i The following were excused : Robert de Stradley i, Hugo fil Ralf de' Gresley 3, Robert de Pavelli 4, John de Heriz 4, Eustace de Morton 3, Philip de Kime \, Ralf fil Nic (in custody) 3, Robert fil William 3, Robert de Essebi, Wm. de Cantelupe 4 (Hugo Insula), Com de Ferrars i fee in Higham, Roger Brito I fee of Hugo de Nevil, Wm. Basset \\, Rad Musard 15, Tom de Birkin £\2 for 12, Robert de Chances i. The following are excused : John de Stuteville 15, Wm. Albini 2, Rad Freschville 15, Emma de Bellafago i, Wm. Bard 25, Nic. THE PIPE ROLLS. 203 de Lettres i, Com de Ferrars 68 J, Wm. Briwere 3 in Cesterfield, and 10 of Roger Buron, Countess of Eu 60 and 3 parts of i in Tickill. AMERCIAMENTS BY S. DE SEGRAVE ANd' HIS ASSOCIATES. Wm. Brien, Ad de Herthill, Robert Wischard, Rad. fil Nic, Robt de Ramton, John de Lek, Wm. fil Alured, Will Rufus, Galf de Acour, John fil John de Northamber, Odierna, wife of Stephen fitz John, Asces Faber, of Nottingham, Hy. de Marcham, Rad de Wudburg, Will, fil Ulfketel, Rich fil Rich de Bedford, Robert de Alveleg, Astin Cardun, Henr Kitte, Robert Brien, Simon fil John, Robert Salvage, Adam de Castre, Fulc de Mora, Gilbert de Fenton, Robert de Roer, Mathew de Sandiacre, Rad fil Richard de Oskinton, Galf del Estre, Silvester de Bingham, Rad fil Rad de Cotgrave, Wm. fil Herberd, Will. Torcard, Adam fil Pastas, Robert fil Rich de Grave. The sheriff accounts for the goods of the following persons : — Henry Propositus de Totteshal, Robert Tailegnant, Rich fil Brien Brun, Passilew de Buneie, Richard Brien, Robt Feld, Stephen fil Robert, John de Bruchton, Roger fil Beatrice Roger fil Hen and Robert de Meisnil, Thos. fil Richard, Thos. Briton, Walter fil Hodierna, Rad Pollard, John de Hocknorton, Roger his brother, William Tort Boszard (Thorpe Bussardj, Hugo fil Ralf I m. for Ud. Ud. (.?), Robert Kilbel. pipe IRo. 77—17 ibenr? iii. Rad fil Nicolas, sheriff ; Hugo de Bel, for him. And in the Long chamber of the king in the Castle of Not- tingham, and the (caninio) thereof, repairing, and the arms of the king (rotulandis) and the caruagis (?) (quarettis) of the king (burniendis), £4. 13s. 3|d. Richard de Berford, Canon of Southwell. Adam de Hertewell (in a previous Roll this name was written Herthill, query if they are identical), Walter Hert and other men of Whiteley. 204 THE PIPE ROLLS. The men of Chestrefeld accounted for 20 m. for having the king's confirmation of the Charter of Wm. Briwere, their lord. (This is proof that William Briwere's acquisition of this Manor was an illegality ; it being of the ancient demesne of the Crown, Chestrefield could only be legally granted in fee farm. The younger William Briwere, to whom the grant was made, seems to have died about this period, and his estates had devolved upon his coheirs, who had now succeeded to this illegal grant. They, of course, desired to have the confirmation of the king to the charter which Wm. Briwere granted to the town, for which there could have been no necessity had it been a vahd grant to him, and which was now chiefly valuable, inasmuch as it practi- cally confirmed their right to succeed to his property.) Hugo Wac, nephew and one of the heirs of Wm. Briwere, the younger, c. m. for having the portion which fell to him of the lands which were his uncle's, and by the pledge of Philip Albini, William de Percy, and Richard de Wiverton for £20 for license of concord. Wm. de Wiverton 20s. for license of concord by the pledge of Ralf Basset, of Draiton, Richard de Hardreshill, Hugh fil Ivan, and Adam fil John. Walter fil Molle, Wm. fil Osbert de Arnhal, Richard de Rutton, Robert fil Fulcher, p pi Stephen Meynil, and Henry de Codington. Stephen fil Arnald de Guile i m. by the pledge of Will de Stanton, John de Aincourt was attached for 20s. for default of appearance, Andrew Marescal, Wm., nephew of Capellanus, of Newark, Simon fil Hawis, Galf de Thorn. The Earl of Ferrars, who had to wife one of the heirs of R. formerly Earl of Chester, owed ;^50 for his relief. ptpe IR0. 78.-18 Ibenrg ill. Ralf fil Nicolas, sheriff; Hugo de Beel, for him. And for covering (co-opienda) with lead over the long chamber of the king beyond the granaria in the Tower of Nottingham, ^7 os 2^d. Henry Corbin in Carlton. THE PIPE ROLLS. 205 Nicolas de Haddon was allowed c. s. for negotiating certain business for the king. William fil Walkelin, the King's Huntsman (Venator), c. s. being sent to the King's Forest of Peak. Norman Naureman. Ann, widow of Philip Marc, to have c. s. (as long as she lived) from Bulwell for several assarts. Leonius de Malvoers 4 m. Giles de Berkley answers for ^2^22 for Robert fil Wm. de Berkely. Walter de Hertwell 20 m. Wap de High Peak. Ad de Herthill, John de Norhanton, Will Dun, Ric fil Ric de Retford, Gilb de Fenton, Rad fil Nic, Falcon de Mara, Alan Bellus (Varlettus) de Newark, Galf de Thorn. NEW OBLATIONS. Peter de Rivers (Rivall), the rents of the lands of Nigel de Molbrai, out of which land were excepted the lands which his wife held in dower. Amauric Pincerna, son and heir of Wm. Pincerna, ^^30 for his fine and relief for 6 knights' fees, which the said William held of the king in capite, his pledges, the Earl of Ferrars and Hugo Dispens. Robert de Treleg, Galf de Stapelford, Robert de Furnel, and Ralf de St. George, Roger de Maresie, Olivia de Montebegonis, Hugh de Derisbric, Matilde de Luvetot, Robert Scarle. Gerard, son and heir of Gilbert de Sutton, 14s. for his relief, Robert de Cokefield, Reginald de Mendreye, Richard le Haia de Bulwell. Letitia de Chevcurt, Robert de Furnel, and Ydonia de St. Quenten, cousins and heirs of Ralf de Chevercourt, ^10 for hav- ing seizin of land in Becton. The Bailiffs of Nottingham to have writ of summons against Ydonia Vipont. Ralf Basset, son and heir of William Basset, ^30 for the farm of Bolsover. Ralf fil Nicol cc. m. for having the custody of the land and 206 THE PIPE ROLLS. heir of Robert fil William de Esseby, who answers in Northamp- ton. The Talliages of the Towns were assessed by the sheriffs, Wm. Basset and Thomas Aunselin. ipipe IRo. 79—19 Denri? ill. Ralf fil Nicolas, sheriff ; Wm. de Derley, for him. Eustace de Ludham 2 m. in Carlton. Hugh le Bell i6d. for the farm and for license to waste (excolandi) 4 acres in Wistendal. The heirs of Brian de Insula. Godfrey Spigurnel in Scheggbi, Ivan de Heriz, Peter Marc, Passe Albini, William de Aldworth. NEW OBLATIONS. Henry fil Henry le Noreis, a writ of mort ancestor. Adam de Greddling i m. for disseizin. The Earl of Ferrars c. £ for having custody of the land and heir of Amauric le Boteler until he was of age, together with his marriage (he attained his age 22 Henry III.) Roger fil Jordan de Worth 10 m. for the king's confirmation, Wm. fil Daniel Pincerna 30 m. for having the king's charter for two mills, one upon the waters of Weya and upon the bridge there, and the other in Fairford, which Brian de Insula by his free will freed from the tax which King John imposed upon the said Daniel, the father of the said William, for the mill of Worm- hill, and the suit of the men and all other liberties, which the same mills paid (reddit) per annum by the hands of the bailiffs of Peake 5 m. ; the same William i6s. 8d. for the farm thereof for \ the year ; Wm. de Gaugy, Richard fil Rad de Bulwell, Gerard de Sutton, Alice ux Matthew de Sepely 2 m. ; Margerie ux Robert de Byrton 8 m., by Mathew, and Robert and Mathew de Scordis, brother of the said Margaret, was taken and detained in prison ; Roger Monachus recedes in his suit v. Walter de Rufford, John le Oyelles, in Derby ; Alice, widow of Astin, of Derby ; Osbert fil Lucian de Seleg, Rich, fil Wm. de Neuthorpe pledges Robert de Brunesley and Henr de Arnhall ; Rad de THE PIPE ROLLS. 207 Hereford J m., Eustace de Ludham 6d. for the farm of Karlton and Lindric, Henry Kitte, Will Brien, Asketel fil Alice. BMpe IRo. 80-20 Ibenrs III. Ralf fil Nicolas, sheriff; Wm. de Derley, for him. Hugo fil Ralf and Robert le Vavasor acted as keepers (custos) for the sheriff. Allowed for one horse, with harness (hernesia), bought for the use of a certain messenger of the Empress 60s. ; and for the carriage of 20 tons of wine, which John de Colemere bought in the fair of St. Botulf, to Nottingham, and placing in the castle there for the use of the king. Wm. Pincerna 7 m. Robert de Lexinton 26s. of the rents of the land of Thomas de Birkin, as the same were formerly in his hands ; Robert de Everingham and J his wife fined for having that land. The Burgh of Derby continued to pay ^^40 for the farm of their towns ; Wm., Earl Ferrars, the same sum for Wirksworth and Ashburn. NEW OBLATIONS. Robert de Lexington c. s. for his relief for 8 fees in Cukeford. Robert Musard 20s. for having 4 knights. Johanna, wo. of Thomas de Berle, 3 marcs for the custody of the land of Berleg. Oliver de Aincourt 5 m. de Prestito Brit. (Scutage of 14 Henry HI.) Eustace de Moretaing 2 m. ; Rad de Sticleye, per John Russel ; Josce de Leycestre (a Jew in Nottingham) 40 m., which Simon (Jew) de Bungehaia de Mount Sorel appealed ; Moyses fil David the Jew. Amersise fil David Lumbard. John de Heriz 3 m. for relief for Ivo his brother's lands. Isaac fil Bone, M. Sardon Peter de Derby, John fil William in Chelardiston. The Bishop of Carlisle answered for the farm of Melburn. Castle of Peak : Rich, de Sutton and Walter de Rhodes. 2o8 THE PIPE ROLLS. pipe IRoU no, 81. NO NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY, EXCEPT A RETURN FOR PEC AND TIDESWELL. Wm. de Tideswell who had the Honour to farm by Charter paid 5 m. William Ragge. flo. 82—22 ifoenri? ill. Hugo fil Ralf and Robert le Vavasor. Many repairs to the castle this year, amounting to £S73 4S- Qd. ; Marie, wo. Robt. fil Hugh, 74s. 8d. in Claworth as dower ; Richard de Hardreshill £j 9s. 4d. AMERCIAMENTS. Wm. Pincerna 6| m. for assarts, Leonius de Malvoers, Robt de Cressy, Wm. Peverel. Galf del Bee pledges Oliver Le Foun and Ran de Weston, OHver de Montealto his bail, John de Stapenhill, Rad de Tykehall, and Hy. de Hertshorne. Henr. le Tailour of Nottingham 20 m. p. Willo Pateric for disseizin ; pledges Robt. Ingeram, Rad Bugge, Augustine Clic, John fil William, Astin fil Alice, Wm. de Paris. Henry de Cley de Derby pledges Walter fil Thos. de Derby, Pagan Blund, Hy. Peut, and Simon Gudherd ; Ralf fil Nicol de Halton, Walter de Kirkham, Rich fil Michael de Penwis, and William le Franceis de Archelastre ; Rich, le Carpenter in Carlton pledges Richard le Brun de Notingham, Wm. de Aldacheton, and Herbert de Insula ; Rad fil Godfrey de Roslaveston and Ralf Ralkman ; Hugo fil Nicol de Derby pledges Nicol fil Aldred de Derby, Henry his brother, Hugo fil William de Derby, Wm. de Haddledene. Robert fil Ingram, Rad Bugge. Decenna of Robert de Ernhall in Nottingham. Wm. Doynel, Wm. de Geytford. THE PIPE ROLLS. 209 NEW OBLATIONS. Galf de Griseley, Rad Gernun, Wm. fil Thomas de Edenstoure, and Matilde his wife ; Willo de Sandeby, Cecelia de Edingel, Roger de Aincourt, Robert de Stanton, Robert de March, Johanna, widow of Robert Maluvel, Robert de Acastra, Roger de Nevil, Alexander de Wandesley, Agatha his mother, John fil Norman in Wigorn, Hugo Poniz in Gloucestershire, Hugo de Blaston. pipe IR0U mo. 83.-23 ibenrs ill. Hugo fil Ralf and Robert Vavasor, as keepers for the first half-year ; Arnold de Bosco and Will de Erlege for him for one-fourth year ; WILLIAM DE CanteluPE for the last quarter. Heremite St. Godarn in Haia de Kirkwood. Castle of Harestan : by the view of William Brien and Henry Talliatoris. NEW OBLATIONS. The mill under the castle of Nottingham. William de Hagh, John de Acton, outlaws. The heirs of Wm. Briwere, except Hugh Wac and Wm. de Percy, owe £12 us. 4d., but answer in Southampton ; Hugo fil Robert, bail Robert fil Arnal de Stapenhill, county of Derby ; Robert de Yolgreve (see in Warwickshire Itinerary of W. de Raleg). Iplpe IR0U mo. 84.-24 Ibenrs ill. Wm. Cantelupe, custos; Baldwin de Panton, for him. NEW OBLATIONS. Robert Malore. Walter de Evermue 20 m. for one doe (dama) and one hinid (bissa) which he took without warrant. Henry de Lameley and Robert his son, for the pannage of Beskwood, 7 m., 2d. 28 2IO THE PIPE ROLLS. Henry fil Brictive, Magr. Simon de Hoyland, Robert de Ros, 3 m. for viU of Mansfield. Hugo fil Ralf 65 m., for the wood and garden which the king gave him in Welley. Robert de Lamel, vills of Welley and Lindebi ; Wm. Batty, Gerard de Sutton, Robert Stopham, for the pannage of Sherwood and Romwood. Robert de Aincourt, Robert de Curzon, heirs of Lawrence de St. Michael ; Robert de Tuyt. Galf Dispenser D m. for the custody of the heir of Robert Musard and his marriage. Ralf fil Nicol 10 m. for Walter de Stanley for the pannage of Birchland, Belhanger. William de Lucy. pipe TFlo. 85—25 Denrg HI. Baldwin de Pan ton, sheriff. Robert le Vavasor for Wm. de Franceis. NEW OBLATIONS. Rad de Crumwell, John de Gatton, Robert de Pavelli c. s. John de Stuteville for taking venison without warrant, Rad fil Nicol, Thomas Wellum and Sarra his wife, Reginald de Mendre and Isolde his wife, Nicolas de Eyvill, Matilde de Chauc, Robert de Gravel and Matilde his wife, Reginald de Anesleia and Sibel de St. Maria, Wm. de Sandeby, Galfr fil Faber de Crumwell, Wm. Brun. Griffin fil Wenuwin fined 300 m. for having his father's lands, saving rights and liberties. NEW FOREST. Richard Ragged and Thom Foljambe 30 m., Richard Ragged 3 marcs for the same by the pledge of Simon de Staveley and Wm. de la Rode, Thomas Foljambe 20s. for the same. Hugo fil Rait 10 m. for a transgression. Ernald de Bosco c. s., John de Gatesdene, John Anselin de Barton de Rich Hillar. THE PIPE ROLLS. 211 Robert de Stanton, John de Sandeby, Galfr de Bee, Roger de Hockover, John de Sandeby. The Counties of Nottingham and Derby, fines, etc., jQ\62 2s. gd. Robert Boite de Hertington, Ralf Gernun lo m. for a default, Robt. de Hackover, William de Coleworth, Warner Engain lO m. for his expenses, Robert de la Haie, Rad de Sulley, John Wascelin, Eustace de Ludham. pipe IRo. 86—26 Ibenrg III. Baldwin de Panton, sheriff. Walter de Evermu ;^8 los. for venison taken without warrant. The heirs of Brian de Insula 72s. for beasts (averiis) taken in Bestwood. Odo de Richrhond 20s. Griffin fil Wenuwyn 300 m. for having his land ; nothing yet paid. Ralf Gernon 10 m. for a default. NEW OBLATIONS. Roger de Ros, the king's scissor, the manor of Kingshaw. The sheriff accounted for the rents of the land of John de Heriz from the 5th day of November. Nicol de Molis paid c. m. for having the custody of his heir until he should be of age, together with his marriage. The sheriff accounted for the rents of the land of Hugo Wake from the i8th Dec. to the 26th Dec, and for the custody of his heir. Celestine, the widow of Walter Riebof. Robert de Lathum and Johanna his wife, one of the heirs of Thomas fil Robert (de Alfreton), accounted for £"] los. for her relief for her portion of the inheritance of the said Thomas, saving the other moiety of the same inheritance, until the coming of age of Thomas de Chaucis' nephew and the other heir ; and the said Robert accounted for 115 m. and 3 palfreys for having the custody of the portion of the said Thomas, saving his wardship to the king. Nicol de Cusincton, Wm. Gernun, Wm. de Tideswell, Pauline de 212 THE PIPE ROLLS. Banton, Galfr de Mapelton lo m. for a transgression, Henry de Mapelton £,20 for a transgression, Thomas de Stratton p. Roger de Osberton, Robert de Surreys, Gilbert de Brunesly, Galf de Stapelford, Roger Brito, Cecil de Mervill, John de Gatton, Ralf de Fresseville, Regin de Mendre, Hugo fil Rad. pipe mo. 87.-27 Denrg III. Baldwin de Panton, sheriff Richard de Plumtree of Nottingham. Wm. Peverel. NEW OBLATIONS. Hugo de Duckmanton, Roger de Verdun, Robert de Ros, Anselm de Bosco, Walter de Lettler, Walter de Farring- don, Wm. Freeve, Amiot fil David the Jew of Nottingham 200 m., Reginald the Miller of Elpiston, Thom de Fifehed, Hugo fil Leofwin, Robert de Scardelawe, Thomas fil William de Rotenden, Reginald de Mendre and Isolde his wife. pipe IRo. SS, r. I.— 28 ttenr? HI. Baldwin de Panton, sheriff Henry de Hastings and Ada his wife £'i,% 19s. in Oswardebec, as in Roll 26, and in Mansfield with its sokes £'^6 7s. 6d. In Carlton and Lindric, £% \ m. Hugo Lovel, Henry fil Rann de Scyrle £^2 2s. William de Aldworth. Galf de Guyon. Wm. Daniel held the mill of Tideswell. Henry le Tailour of Nottingham for Wm. Patric pledges Robert Ingram and Rad Bugge. Odo de Richmond. Hugo fil Ralf £\J 4s. lod. for selling camblic of the Haya of Welly. John Anselin de Barton 2 m. which he received of Richard Hillier. THE PIPE ROLLS. 213 Roger de Hackovre, Rad de Newerc, Robert Lathom and Johanna, Thomas de Stratton, Rohes de Verdun, Thom de Fifehead, Bailiff of Newerc, Robert de Scardclive. NEW OBLATIONS. Thomas fil Jacob de Welhun. Rich fil William, Daniel de Tideswell S m. for his relief and for having seizin of the land which his father held of the king in capita Simon de Veer, Galf de Stapelford, Alexr. le Marchant, Roger de Ros c. s. for the farm of the manor of Kingshawe. Gerard de Rhodes paid (no account) for relief of the land which was Ralf his father's. John Lexington £,6 for 3 tons of wine received from the custody of the king's vintnors of Blythe. Rich fil Walter and Rich le Provost, Rich de Furnel. pipe iRo. 89, rot. 3—29 ibenrs in. Baldwin de Panton, sheriff. John de Nevil held the farm of Arnhale. Wm. Earl of Ferrars the farm of Wirksworth and Esseburn. Galfry de Stoke. Walter de Evermu and Robert de Brus. See in Essex. John Ascelin de Barton. John de Stuteville. AMERCIAMENTS BY ROGER DE TURKILBY. Oliver de Aincourt, his bail, Ph de Darcy and John de Aincourt. Robert de Prestclive, bail. Rich de Alford. NEW OBLATIONS. Thom. de Stratton 8 m. William fil and heir Rob de Passeis 2 m. for his relief, Ralf fil Nic £6, I m. for assart at Cannoc, Will de Ferrar 4 m. for the same. 214 THE PIPE ROLLS. pipe IKlo. 90, rot. 6—30 Ibenrs III. Baldwin de Panton and Robert le Vavasor, each for half a year. Scutagc ^e CanwicF? 409, per Iknigbt's fee. DE HONORE PEVEREL. Roger de Wiverton -g- of i f, Roger de Brito i, Robert de Strelly i, Roger de Mendre (Rich de Grey) 6 fees of Henry de Grey, John de Aincourt ^, Wm. fil Robert de Sibtorp J, John de Heriz 4, Rad de Wihby |, Peter de Goldington 4, Peter de Vadis J (Mathew de Haverseth), Ph de Ulecote (heirs of Robert fil Wm.) 3, Nicolas le Abbe 2, Wm. Huse i, John de Montecute i, Galf de Sacville i, Robert de Salceto i, Robert de Hele i, Dominium de Bolsover 2\, Walter de Hertwell i, Bernard de Hertwell, Hugo de Haversham i, Wm. de St. Patric 3, Hospice in Blackvesly i, John de Nevil |, Wm. de Dufton I, Phil de Kime \, Hugo de Nevil \. The following are released : — Galf Eccleston i, Richard de Stapelford, John de Bellocampo \\, Hugo fil Raif de Gresley 3, Robert de Pavelli 4, Eustace de Moretone 3, Will Bassett \\, Heirs of Robert de Essibi 3, Earl of Ferrars i, in Heyam, Wm. de Cantelupe 3, of Hugh de Insula. The same for the County Heirs of Wm. Briwere £,26 for 3 fees in Chesterfield, and 10 of Roger de Buron, the Countess of Ewe 60 fees and 3 pts of i, Robert de Chaucis i, Emma de Bellafago i, Rad de Musard 15. The following were excused: — Thom de Birkin 12 fees, Rad de Fressonville 15, Peter de Geune. The custodian of the heirs and the land of Wm. Albini 2, W. de Ferrars i, John de Stute- ville 15, Wm. Bardolf 25, the Earl of Ferrars 68|. AID FOR MARRYING THE KING'S DAUGHTER £1 PER FEE. Robert de Strelly 20s., Wm. de Albini 40s., Wm. Bardolf ,;^i 5, Nic le Abbe 40s., Wm. Hose 20s., John de Montecute 20s., Galf de Sacville 20s., Wm. de Htwell 20s., Hu de Haversham 20s., THE PIPE ROLLS. 215 H 20s., Wm. de St. Patric 60s., Robert de Salceto 20s., Robert de Hese 20s., Bolsover 30s., Heirs of Robert de Essebi 60s., the Earl of Ferrars 20s., John de Rousel los., Wm. de Duston 60s., Philip de Kime 20s., Wm. de Cantelupe los., Hugh de Nevil 20s., Reg de Mendre 30s., John de Stuteville £,6, Heirs of Wm. Briwere ;^I3, Rad Musard ;^is, Nic de Lectris 20s., the Countess of Ewe ;^6o 15$., the Earl of Ferrars £2\ I OS. NEW OBLATIONS. Margerie de Stocum i m. Robert fil Ralf Galf de Bakepuz, Nigel de Lysurs, Ingram de Colling, Hug atte Cunisheved, Wm. de la Lande. pipe IRo. 91, r. 5.-31 Ibenr? III. Robert le Vavasor, sheriff. AMERCIAMENTS BY W. DE EBOR. Henry le Taylor de Nottingham by Wm. Patric, Walter de Kirkham, Simon de Staveley, Wm. fil John de Wilne and Gilbert fil Marie de Salle, John fil Norman 2 bovates of land in Dotinton and Presteclive. Rad le Newerc, Robt. Ginkelpeny and Ran le Surreis, Walter de Herluin, Wm. de Hodisac. NEW OBLATIONS. Richard Grey fil and heir Isolde de Grey .^28 los. for his relief for the lands which were Isolde's, his mother. John fil and heir Oliver Deincourt c. £ for his relief Robert de Handesacre and Alina his wife, Richard fil Henry de Curzon, Mathew de Haversege, Andrew de Widington, Alexander de Wandesley, Juliana the widow of Thomas fil Hugh 44s. 2i6 THE PIPE ROLLS. pipe mo. 92, r. 13.-32 Ibenrs ill. Robert le Vavasor, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. Ran de Jort and Cecil his wife, Robert le Bey, Richard fil Richard Ingeram, Sampson de Haselbec, Alexr. de Wandesley, John de Aubini J m. for false claim, Thorn de Chaworth I m. for disseizin, Maurice Pistore, Matilde de Heriz, Robt. de Lathum. Abbot of Derley renders composition of c. s. by reason of the Abbey of Derley being vacant and in custody of the king. Simon de Hedon ;£"io for a charter of Freewarren. Giles de Meynil and Margaret his wife v. Robert de Pavelli. Roger de Stoke, John Rescuchun 4 m. for a year and a day for the lands of William Hastenot. Sampson fil and heir Philip de Strelly 2 m. for relief of a mill in the borough of Peck. John de Gratton 10 m. Magister Will, Archdeacon of Derby, c. s. p. pi. Regin de Leye. John de Eyncourt 15 m. for a transgression, and 20 m. for not producing Simon de Dudington and others for whom he was bail. Ad fil Lyolf, Alice sister of Agnes, Robert Basset and Thomas Basset, Thom Pikot, Osbert Selveyn. Thomas de Lanum, Will de London, Robert de Furneus, Ad de Eyville. Galf fil Nicolas de Sutton and Wm. le Fuler, Roger fil Wm. de Turgarton, Richard Mody, Jacob fil Jacob de Lenton, Robert le Noreis, Wiscard fil Wiscard, Henr. fil Henr. and Thos. fil Stephen de Molesfen, Richard fil Ede and Roger Camara, Roger fil Matilde and Alan Blund, Rad Colebrand de Radford, Rad le Bond, Galfred at the tree of Lenton, Thos. de Chaucis, Wm. fil Amfred, Galfry fil Fulc and Henry le Fuler, Regin de Glottis, Regin fil Henry de Eston and Wm. fil Henry de ead, Hugo Staunford, Wm. Russel, Almaric de Nodariis, Robert fil Henry Arcur, Rich, fil Henry de Curzon, Walter de Stanton, Henr. de Verdun, Wm. Crawe. THE PIPE ROLLS. 217 pipe IKlo. 93, i\ 3—33 Ibenrg III. Robert le Vavasor, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. John fil Walter de Carlton. Wm. de Grey 40 m. for having custody of the land and heir of Andrew de Derle. John de Littlebur and Margaret his wife, Isabella de Aincourt, Wm. de Wollaveston, John de Vylers, Galfr Barri, Galf de Fan- court, Augustine le Port (qy. Alport). Rich., son and heir of Galf Heriz, c. s. for relief for his father's lands. John de Tadington, Gervase de Clifton, Robert fil Henry and Artur de Kampton v. John fil Margaret de Torp, Thos. de Arches, Stephen Maloverer, Henr. de Stanfeud, Wm. de Curtenay, John Pipard, Roger de Camara, Roger de Turkilby, Martin de Boneye v. John de Hardhevedde de Newerc, Galfr Yollershand pledges John de Peversthorpe, Bailiff de Derby, Mathw. de Reyndon, Wm. de Gernun excused 40s., Alexr. de Vylers and Wm. de Chauces, collectors of the aid for marrying the king's sister, John de SconteviHe. pipe IR0. 94 r. 10 an5 22.-34 Denrs III. Robert le Vavasor, sheriff. Urcellus, a Jew of Nottingham. AMERCIAMENTS. Wm. Musard v. Ralf fil John le Cuper. Matilde de Burebec, John Marmiun, Wm. Wylot, Will de Barewe, Robert fil John and Robert de St. George, Juliana, widow of Thomas fil Hugh, Robert de Hastings. NEW OBLATIONS. Galf fil Fulk V. Alan Culling, Rich de Leicester, in Gameligeye. Stephen de Watenho and Margaret, his wife, v. William de 29 2l8 THE PIPE ROLLS. Trikingham, Gilbert de Muscamp v. Will Wyne, Peter de Tuke V. Galf de Langeton bail Nic de Hasting and Jacob de Land. Henr. de Toke, Thorn de Chaddesdon, Gilbert de Brunesli, Margaret, widow of Rad Grun. Rad fil Nicolas cccc. m. for having custody of the land and heir of Alice Harang and Osbert Gififord with the marriage of the same heir, Roger Scissor, John de Lessington, Ralf fil Nicolas. The sheriff accounts for the Serjeantry of Sandiacre, 5s. from Eustace fil Eustace and John, his son, for one place in the Town of Derby of the Serjeantry of Sandiacre ; 5s. from Isolde fil Eustace of Sandiacre, i m. Wm. fil Peter of Sandiacre, 2s. Henry, the younger, of Sandiacre, 2s. Robert Bissopand Hugo de Champenys, 2s. Nigel Barre, 3 Hugo fil Ralf, 2 Henry Raven and Matilde, his wife, 20s. Roger de Essex, los. Mathew fil Mathew de Sandiacre, 20 Galf de Stoke, i m. Hugo de Staple- ford, I m. Peter Fabre, 5s. Wm. fil Peter de Derby, ^ m. Hugo fil Nigel, 20s. The Abbot of Dale, i m. Nic de Wermundsworth, 1 2d. Wm. fil Faleise, los. Will fil Hugh, | m. William de Haia, 6d. Will de Gray, a toft which Richard fil John held, 4s. Robert, parson of Ratclive, i m. John de Lek, i m. heirs of Robt. Ingram, 15s. heirs of Wm. Duston, 6d. Robert le Vavasor, J m. Juliana fil Robert de Hausted. The sheriff accounts for the Serjeantry of Ratclive 20s., Elias Pikot 5s., and Leticia | m., Stephen Coke los., John le Ostricer 6s., Ernold fil Elie 4s., heirs of Thorn le Taylor 4, Mathew de Sandiacre 4s., Wm. Pymme for i virgate of land 4s., Thomas le Paumer \ m., Hugo de Musson i m., John de Leek 4s., Rico Leman los., Felicia fil Wm. Ponignant i m., Anketel fil Thomas los.. Prior de Bredon 4s., Robert de Hausted 5, Wm. le Bretun de Huccenal for 2 bovates of land in Huccenal, Radford, and Kirkebi, of the Serjeantry of Hugo fil Coste, 2s. 6d., Rich Free- man IS. 6d., Elias de Bretun for 8 a. of land 4d., Richard Aswardby 2 a., Nic Norman 8 a. 3d., Walter de Stanley for i a. ir.. Prior de Felly 2s. 8d., Galf de Langton, Stephen le Marescal 6d., of the House of the Hospitallers of St. John of Nottingham 3d., John de Pierpunt, 3 a. land, i m., Alice fil Robert Passeis, land in Sutton, late Robert Passeis 2s., Eleanor le Porter de Lenton, 4s., Alan le Passeis 3s., Prior of Lenton 15s., Robert de Mus- camp for 5 bovates of land of the Serjeantry of Brunesley, | m., THE PIPE ROLLS. 219 Henry de Estheut for J of a mill in Brunesley 153, Robt de Brunesley for 4 bov. and 9 a. of assarts in Trowell and Brunesley, 4, Thomas Tobbe for 12 a. of the same 6s., Alexander de Wandesley for land in Bestwood, called Bocwood, and com- mon pasture with (pessona), qy. pannage in the woods of Beskwood, 60s. of the Monks of Semplingham, and 6 bovates, which they bought of Marsel of Trowell, Robert le Bay ^4. for 2 mills in Derby of the Serjeantry of Sandiacre, Prior of St. Catherine's, Lincoln, 40s. for 20 bovates of the Serjeantry of Walter Marisco, in Cotinton, Alice, widow of Roger le Hunt, 2 m, for having the custody of the land and heir of the said Roger, NEW OBLATIONS. Nigell de Amundeville, Simon fil Walter Marc de Spepel, Henry de . . . lond and Roger de la Lade, Petronilla de Cress- well, and Sarah, her sister, John de la Lade, Michael, Custos of the Priory of Swanesey, Sarah, widow of Wm. de Rypton, Alice de Torneye, Juone Quarrel, Iptpe IRo. 95.-35 Denrs III. Robert le Vavasor, sheriff. John Parson of Normanton, Alan fil Robert de Rodmerthwait, and Alan Ruffyn ; Robert de Warth, by the pledge of Richard de Vernon and Richard de Fernlegh ; Robert Curzon 60 m., by the pledge of Wm. de Curzon of Croxhall, and the son of Hugh. Thomas fil Wm., by the pledge of Walter fil Adam de Staveley, Wm. Plungar. Matthew de Haversegge 20 m. fine for having Bukestall Forest by the pledge of Adam de Cyvill, Wm. fil Martin de Arnhal, Reg. de Foxlow, Roger de Springhos, Hugo de Roc. NEW OBLATIONS. Robert fil Roger de Breton c, s. for his relief John le Foun, Roger de Tideswell, Rad de Gredon and Matilde his wife, Matil de Nevil, Wm. de Meysham, Sewell Forester, Alice Wo. of Robert fil Roger v. Peter fil Peter, Will Parson de 220 THE PIPE ROLLS. Eccleshall p. Willam servant of the same Parson, Oliver fil Oliver le Foun v. Wm. de Ferrar 4s. for the goods of Rad Alain fil Benesey, Jew, of Nottingham ; Thomas Pykot, Wm. Bryto, Rad de Sneinton, Walter de Ryebof and Eva his wife, Roger de Eyncourt, Rd. de Weston, Alan de la Venelle, Roger fil Mathew, Henry Walurich, Rad de Grendon, Ralf fil Ernulf, Henry fil Reginald, Wm. de Bancwell and Will Albin, Walter fil Robert de Barnebi, Wm. Hotot de Chelingoc, Ric de Madwell, John de Rusel, Robert le Sauvage v. Magr Nic John de Haveburg, Peter de Legh, Wm. de Grant by the pledge of Nic de Whitford and Step de Stok, Robert de Quincey by the pledge of Rad de Freschville and Wm. le Grant, Robert Maulere, Canon Suell 80 m. by the pledge of Wm. Jassup and Robert de Handisacre. pipe IRo. 96—36 Ibenrs HI. Robert le Vavasor, sheriff. NEW PLEAS. Magr Richard de Rupe, Will Tuchet, Robert de London, Thomas fil Peter, Isabelle de Everingham c. s., Richard de Rupe, Wm. Trunchet, Wm. de Hagh, Will fil William de Montgomery, John Barry. Robert fil Rad de Winfield v. Henr de Hoketon, Katherine fil Rad de Winfield. Thomas de Staunford, extent of the manor of Loudham, which Walter Biset held. Henry de Mapelton owes c. s. that he should not be put upon the assize, and Will de Meysham 10 m. for the same ; Simon fil Alexander de Northelecton, Robert de la More de Crumbwell, Galf fil William, Robert Everard, Alice, widow of Herbert de Camara, v. Wm. de Anesley ; Galf de Fancourt, Peter de Rotherfield, Rich, fil Galf de Stapleford, Henry de Chadington, Sampson le Dun, Walter Serjeant de Newark. Rad fil Nicolas ccc. m. for having the custody of the land and heir of Fulc Coudray, Robert de Hoton in Hoton 20s. for the flight of Alexander Wase, Wm. Vernun, Wm. de Saundeby, Alice fil Robert Passeis 4 bovates of land of the Serjeantry by Robert de Sutton, John de Heriz, William de Messam, Wm. de Grey per Roger de Essex. THE PIPE ROLLS. 221 pipe iRo. 97, r. 16.-37 ibenrs ni. Robert le Vavasor, sheriff. John Stuteville, John Scrutville, Thomas fil Ralf and John his brother, Gilbert fil Hugo and Agnes his wife, Hugo de Meysham, Richard de Nutale and Hugo of the same, Nich fil Hugo de Bredesham, Robert de Winefield, Wm. de Tornas, Philip de Colwick Presbiter, Robert Sampson, Wm. Doggnal, Juetta, widow of Henry le Fitz, Isabella de Albini, Wm. de Aytrop de Osmundeston, Hugo de Bussay, Richard de Hertwell, Will de Hotot, Nich de Smershill, Ann ux Rad Hereford, Idonea, one of the heirs of Richard de Wiverton, ^ m. for her relief, Rad Bugge of Nottingham, Philip fil William v. Richard fil William de Bancwell, Wm. fil Ralf and Wm. de Bercher, Wm. Tuke and Alice his wife. John le Sauvage paid (no account) for his relief for the lands of Robert his father. Kenewreyc of Southwell and Henry his brother, Will de Ridwar, Will de Harwood, Gilbert fil John de Halington, Rad de Beaufoy, Henry de Mapelton 8o m. for having an inquisition, pledges, Wm. de Cruce, Hervy de Matherfield, Robert de Lexinton. pipe IRo. 98, r. 3, 4, anb 8—38 Ibenrg III. Robert le Vavasor, sheriff. Edward Fitz R. £102 and \ m. for the executors of the will of W. Earl de Ferrars. NEW OBLATIONS. Oliver de Oddingselles, Wm. le Vavasor, Wm. Tilney, Wm. fil William Payne de Newerc, John de Dunolm, Ric le Fosser, Peter de Mentone, Roger de Lindes, Robt. de Rempston, Alissor de Bek, Gerard de Sutton, Tom de Chaddesdon, John de Aburnum and AveHna his wife, Engelardo de Curzon, Walter de Bakepuz, Wm. Gyun, Robert Torkart, Rob de Seuwill, Gilbert de Pston of Nottingham, Rad Crumwell and 222 THE PIPE ROLLS. Extranea his mother, Robert fil Henry de Lameleg and Eleanor, widow of the said Henry, Ad de Burgaville, Will de Crumwell, Eleanor, widow of Walter fil Robert, Alice, widow of Simon fil Robert, Reg fil Robert de Lamel, John de Skerington, Hamel de Lamel, Wm. de Makeham, Simon fil Fulc, Henry fil Cecil de Lamel, Wm. fil Richard de Burton 4 a., i at Burton, Rich fil Ulric, Nigel de Redwale, Matilde, widow of Tom Bercar of Bulcote, Elias de Shelford, Alxr. de Wandesley 3 a. at Gedling and 3 a. at Carlton, Wm. Milot de Carlton, Rad Bugge de Nottingham 4 a., Wm. Buyli. THE AID TO THE KING GRANTED FOR KNIGHT- ING HIS ELDEST SON, EACH FEE ASSESSED AT 40s. Rich de Wiverton i of a fee, Roger Briton I, Robt. de Stradley I, Rico de Gray 6, Henry de Grey in Touetone, Robt. de Sybtoft J, John de Heriz 4, John de Aincourt |, Rad de Wylibi J, Mathew de Havereshethe i, Ph de Ulecotes, Heirs of Robt. fil William 3, Wm. Bond 40s., John de Monteacute i, Robert de Salceto i, Walter de Hertwell, fees of Barna de Hertwell i, Hugo de Hausham i. Hospitallers, Wm. de Dufton i, Galfry de Eccleston i (Rich de Stapelford), John de Bellocampo if, Hugo fil Ralf de Gresley 3, Eustace de Moreton 3, Will Basset i fee, sum £68 14s. HONOUR OF PEVEREL. Peter de Goldington 4, Nic le Abbe 2, Dominion of Bolsover 2i, Wm. de St. Patric 3, Robert de Esseby 3, Robert de Payli 4, de Saukville i, Robert de Hese l, John de Nevil |, Ph de Kime |, Hugh de Nevil i, Com de Ferrars i Cantelupe, 3 fees of Hugo de Insula. The same of the County. Emma de Bellofago I, Rad de Freshville 15, Tom de Birkin 12, John de Stuteville 15, Wm. Bardolf 25, Wm. Briwere £26 in Chesterfield and 10 f. of Roger Buron, 60s. Simon de Bello- campo 13s., Ralf fil Ralf. Henry de Mcefield 4od., -^ of i of the serjeantry of Schefan- ton ; the Countess of Ewe, 60 fees and 3 parts of i in Tickill ; THE PIPE ROLLS. 223 Rad Musard 15, Wm. de Ferrars i, the Earl of Ferrars 68|, the heirs of Wm. Albini 2. Edward, son of the king, £112 ^ m. for the executor of the will of the Earl of Ferrars. pipe mo. 99, r. 11.-39 Ibenr? III. Robert le Vavasor half a year, and Roger Lovetot the other half, sheriff. John le Savage for his relief as in Roll No. 36. AMERCIAMENTS. Nic ill Matilde de Derby. OBLATIONS. Ralf fil Ralf de Wystanton J m., Oliver de Odingselles, Walter fil William Payn, Thorn de Chauces, John Daubiun, Wm. le Vavasor, John de Dunelm, Rd. le Fosour, Will de Toln, Roger de Lindes, Nic fil Hugh de Breydeston. NEW OBLATIONS. The goods and chatels (bonis et catall) of Richard le Breton were taken into the king's hands because he killed Thomas de Newbold by mischance (per infortunam). Henry de Hertshorn and Ralf de Tyckenhale. Robert le Vavasor paid 40 m. for the marriage of Johanna, the widow of Peter de Goldington ; Alina and Alice, daughters and heirs of Rich de Wiverton, i m. for their relief; Wm. de Wilton, Nic fil Roger de Bellingham, Alexr., William, and Alan his brothers, V. Peter Malvore and Thom. his brother. Maria, widow of Serlo, Rich Pecoc, Rich le Ostricer, Rad de Grendon, William fil Isolde and Hugo le Bager, Hy. de la Keresmere, Hugh de Morton, Nic de Wermordesworth, Hy. de Bek, Will de Alfrinton V. Peter fil Swan and Amice his wife, Robert de Amundeville pledges Rd. de Grey, John de Aincourt, Nic de Heanor, Hy. de West Halum, Gilbert de Merings and Juetta his wife. Step fil John de Verdiston, Stephen de Watenho, Tom de Wellum, 224 THE PIPE ROLLS. Richard de Vernon, ;£'20 for many transgressions. Petronilla de Wodehouse, Walter de Sneynton, Alianor de Bek, Stephen de Sutton, Wm. de Harworth, Peter de Rocheford, John le Cokere, Alexr. Wayfer, John fil Augustine de Suthwell, Robert de Rempston, Walter de Bakepuz, Artaldo de St. Romano. Will Punha Cap, Adam fil Gilbert half a mark for contempt of the Court of Robert de Lathum, Rad de Bellofago, Nicolas de Wermundesworth, Will Brian, Thomas Propositus de Ilkes- don, John Propositus of the same, Wm. Shepy and Hugo his brother, Rich de Bramwic, John fil Augustus, Hugo fil Nicolas. pipe IRo. 100, r. 7—40 Denrs IV. Robert de Lexington, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. Galf fil John de Nottingham, Walter fil John de Estweit, Alice de Batelsford, and John, her brother, Roger le Breton de Whitewell, John fil Ralf de Winstanton, William de Langford and Johanna his wife, Matilde, widow of Robert de Staunton, Will fil William Stelhard, Alice de Monasteriis, Step Maluvell, John Barre. Wm. le Vavasor, fil and heir of Robert. Wm. Montgomery ;^io for having a charter. Richard fil Robert de Lameleg, Amicia, widow of John fil William, Rico le Carpenter, Gilbert de Meering and Juetta his wife, John de Wellum, Thom de Lanum, Wm. de Langeston, Sarra, widow of Walter fil Thomas, Thom Bardolf, Robert de Lathom. Will fil Thomas fil Robert de Welly for his relief Richard Theobald, Elya de la Giene, Petronilla de la Wcod- house, Roger de Wichford, Wm. de Montgomery, Rad de Hulmo, Henry de Brailsford, Rad fil Rad de Coleston, Ralf le Breton, Richard de Walthou, Robert fil Robert de Buckingham, John de Vylers, Will de Ravelston, Ric le Paumer, Thom de Annewik, Laur Ingram, Galfrey de Wynepol and Ermetrude his wife, John de Lovetot, Warinus le Tanur. THE PIPE ROLLS. 225 The Burgesses of Derby 70 m. for having a charter of their liberties, and 60 m. that the county (comitatus) of Derby shall be henceforth held at Derby upon Thursday. Walter de Sneynton, The Masters of the Lepers of St. Leonard's of Derby, Adam de Derby and Robert de Derby, Jacob de Paunton, Wm. de Breyeshal, John de Lovetot, Wm. de Ireton, Richard fil Galfry de Langton. Pavon fil Gocelin, Galfry fil Brittane. Hugo le Despenser ^^15 of the farm of the Castle and the Manor of Hareston, for the farm this year, and for 4 years to follow. Wm. de Boves, Peter Malovel, Walter de Ludham, c. m. for the farm of the Manor of Gunthorpe, with the Soke of Ludham for 7 years. Eadm de Lascy £ 1. for the farm of the Manor of Melburn for 7 years. Roger de Luvetot £4^ for the farm of the Manor of Bolsover for 7 years. Henry de Hertshorn and Ralf de Tikehal answer for the farm of Meleburn for the past year. Ralf fil Hugh, Wm. Rosel. Henry le Ferun, Henry le Cupere, Rich. Barth, Roger Norman, Simon de Hoveringham and Robert le Franceis, the rents of the mill of Nottingham. The heirs of Wm. de Duston owe 15 s. rent for 6 bovates of land of the Serjeantry of Bolsover ; they require 2s. rent of Matilde, daughter and heir of Wm. de Witing for 2 bovates of land in Staunton ; the rent was formerly 3s., paid by Rob. de Crepping and Thorn de Stamford. The heirs of Henry de Hereford 41 m. of the Jews' debts which' are required in Wygorn. pipe IR0. lOl, r. 3.-4X Ibenrs III. Robert de Lexington, sheriff. John fil Stephen de Riggeway.' Hugo fil Ralf de Derebi, Rad Basset ^46 19s. gd 30 226 THE PIPE ROLLS. NEW OBLATIONS. Hugo Bentems, Rad Bugge, Will de Killi, Robert Basset, Wm. de Grey ^24 8s. for the farm of the mill of Nottingham, with the fishery and the Pare under the Castle of Nottingham for 7 years, at the rent of £48 i6\d. ; allowed for the works on the Mill and Pool and Backwater (stagnor et gurgitum) £S8 12s. 2d. Adam fil Alexander de Wychewod, Robert and Ralf de Stranley, John le Forester and Robert le Forester, Step, de Lindebi and Clarice, his wife, Wm. Guyon, Petronilla de la Wodehouse and Simon Bonhume, Rico de Normanton. Henr., Bishop of Line, c. s. his relief for all the lands which John de Lessinton, his brother, held in capite. Rich de Shirbourn answers for him. Robert Wade, Jordan de Leirton, Robt de Winfeud, Ivo de Elington, Constable of Peck, Griffin de Ashford, Nic de Wake- brigg, Rich de Lanfrecomb, Thorn, fil Herbert and Nic, his son, fine 10 m., pledges, Mich de Weston, Rich, le Ragged and Robert Milneton, Robert de Watenhoe, John de Perepunt, Stephen Seman, Rad Freshville, Wm de Meysham, Roger de Roucester, Adam de Newmarch, Wm. de Boves. IPfpe IR0. 102.-42 ibenrg iii. NO NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. pipe IR0U IRo. 103, r. 21—43 Ibenrs ill. Simon (Picot) de Hedon, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. Alexr. de Rames and Havise his wife, Walter Saumur, Rad de Cnapetorp, Robert Brun de Calverton, Wm. de Calverton, Jphn Vilers, John de Skefinton, Alexander de Rames and Havise his wife, Gilbert de Brunesley, John fitz William de Ayleston, Wm. de Vylers, Benedict de Roldeston, Hugo de Busay, Wills de Thethiby, Oliver le Foun, Thorn de Barbot, Robt. de Hotot, John le Engleys, Beatrice, widow of Robert Wapenbrok, John de Eyvil, Julia, widow of Peter Prestleg, Peter fil Peter de Kelme, Will fil Isaac and Alice his wife, Ralph de Halum, Will fil THE PIPE ROLLS. 227 Amice de Maplegh, Walter Petit de Halum and Peter Horestun V. Ivo de Mapley, Matilde de St. Leger, Galf fil Gervase de Chilwell and Ada le Mers de Cogshall, Adam de ThornhiU and Richard fil Robert, John de Berton. Simon Glide de Normanton, Matilde de Jorz. The sherifif accounts for ;^ 16 for the (evas) of Christan de Hert- hill and Agnes his daughter, which he took of the vill of Stave). Roger le Teynturer de Bancwell and Cecilia his wife, John le Enfant and Henry Huttock de Middleton, Peter de Tuke, Richard de Weston, Robert de Hotot 20s., John de Bereweby and M his wife, Wm. de Grey, Robert the Archer and Henry fil Henry de Derley, Ralf fil William de Carlton, Extranea de Dive, Gilbert de Orreby, Bartholomew de Kaldwell and Walter Payn, Henry de Brailsford, Havis widow of Roger de Hovering- ham, Rad de Halum, Rad fil Andrew de Misterton, Roger Thoke, Jordan de Leyrton, Rich de Applestorp, Alan de Marchment, Peter and Hugo Basset, Galf de Wildbof, Gilbert de Grimesley, Ranulf and Robert de Wandesley, Hugh Gnun and Sibilla his wife, Wm. de Norton, Robert Hervey, Hugh fil Roger de Kelham and Beatrice his wife, Thorn de Williamscote, Robert Wednesley, Roger de Lovetot, Gilbert Orreby, Rob. de Miston, Thom de Saracino and Thomas Foljambe, Henry le Foun, Adam le Messenger and Wm. Chapman, Roger de Stretton, Wm. de Sutton, Will de Bukton, Andrew Luttrel, Thom de Whaplade (Q'plade), Matilde, widow of Hugh de Strelly, Hugh de Muscamp and Nic de Strelly, John de Langford and Wm. fil Adam de Everingham, Hy, fil Bet and lo de Retford, Thom de Marasye 20 m. for i fee, which Roger de Luvetot ought to warrant ; Wm. Aung de Nottingham, Wm. Gamelston, Robert de Turmingtorp ; Robert de Meluburn 15 m. in goods of Salomar Bishop (Epis) of the Jews ; of the goods of those which the king seized for the transgressions of the Jews ; Robert de Colingham, Wm. de Pikehall, Robt. de Brynesley, Isolde de Vilers, Will fil Will de Ikeling, Robert de Wichford, Robt. de Bolon, Jac de Paunton, John fil Richard de Croxton, John Picot de Bekingham, Robert fil Robert of the same, El fil Richard of the same, Richard de Castro of the same. Rich, de Lasteles, Norman of the head of the Bridge (ad cap pontis), Henry Carpenter de Hokedon in Kachedale ; Roger Clowes, a fugitive. Magister Nich de Staunford. 228 THE PIPE ROLLS. Scutage of Males assceseb at 406. OF THE HONOUR OF-PEVEREL. Robert de Strelly i fee, Rich de Wiverton i (Note : he was dead before 37 Hy. HI.), Robert de Sibetofte |, Rad de Wylebi I, heirs of Robert fil William 3, John de Montecute i, Walter de Hertwell (Bernard de Hertwell) i, Hospitallers i, Galf de Eccleston (Richard de Stapleford) i, Hugo fil Rad de Gresley 3, Wm. Basset i, Nic le Abbe 2, Bolsover 2^, Robert de Pavelli 4, Robert Hese i, Wm. de Cantelupe 3, Roger Brito i, John de Heriz 4, Mathew de Haverseth (Philip de Ulecotes) i, Wm. Hose I, Robert de Salceto i, Hugo de Haversham i, Wm. de Duston I, John de Bellocampo i| and yV> Wm. (Eustace) de Morton 3, of which R. de Luvetot should respond for i fee ; Peter de Goldington 4, Wm. de St. Patric 3, heirs of Robert de Essebi 3, Galf de Sacville i, Philip de Kime i. The same of the county. Emma de Belfago i, Wm. Bardolf 25, heirs of Wm. Briwere £,26 for 3 fees in Chesterfield, and 10 of Roger Buron ; Ralf Musard 15, heirs of Wm. de Albini 2, John de Stuteville 15, of which R. de Luvetot ought to respond for ^18 \ m. ; Robert de Chauces I, Henry de Macfield i. The following were excused : — Rich, de Grey (heir of Henry) 6, Henry de Grey in Torington, of the Honour of Peverel. The Queen, custos of John de Eincourt (son and heir of Edmond), ^ of the same Honour, John de Nevil \ of the same, Hugo de Nevil I of the same, Rad de Freschville 15, knights' fees of the county; Adam de Everingham (heir of Thomas Birkin) 12; Edmond, brother of Edward, son of the king, answered for I fee of the Earl of Ferrars in Hegham, of the Honour of Peverel, and i fee of Wm. de Ferrars, and 68^ ; the Earl of Ferrars and 60, and 3 parts of i the Countess of Ewe. 20s. for the king's mill of Alreton. John de Kegeworth,'Galf de Newarc, Adam de Eyvill, Milo de Hastings, Philip Lovel (by Magr. Henry Lovel and others his executors). Bald de Insula, Robert de Totenhal, John fil John Luvel, John de Luvetot, Magr. Robert de Shirdlowe, Aaron fil Abraham, Havise de Quincey. THE PIPE ROLLS. 229 pipe IR0. 104, r. 17.-44 Ibenrg III. Simon de Aslacton, sheriff. Henry fil Henry de Hastings in Oswardebec. Henry de Candene and John Lovel, the king's hunters. Simon de Heddon, Wm. Montgomery paid 50 m. of his debt. Walter de Snenton. OBLATIONS. John Langleye, Beatrice, widow of Robert de Wapenbroc, Alexr. de Rames. Thomas Sarraceno and Thomas Foljambe. NEW OBLATIONS. Roger de Luvetot, Robt. Malsoevres, Rad de Crumbwell, Amicia ux Roger de Clerk, Nic de Eyvill, Sarra de Nevil, Matilde, widow of Simon de Greneley, Roger, Prior of Lenton, Roger de Botiller, Brian fil John, Nigel de. Langford and Matilde de Gousle, next heirs of Mathew de Haversegge, Hugh de Bussey, Wm. fil Wm. de Sibertoft, Peter de Lessington, Wm. le Venur, Rad de Muscamp, Will fil Will de Seuel, Robert Luvitot, Andrew Lutrel, Robert de Shipley and Filomena his wife, Robert de Melburn, Roger Luvetot, Jordan de Grendon, Rad de Freschville, Roger de Stretton, Rad fil Felicia, Hugo de Gresle, Rad de Coliston, Clement fil Will de Leirton, Will fil Robert de Wutton, Hump, de Millers and Joha. his wife, Rad le Arnhal, Will fil Warner, Robert de Lathom, Wm. de Horseden, Nigel fil Richard, Mathew de Kniveton, Roger fil Keleshalt, Nic de Berkle, Jordan fil Wm. de Leverton, Wm. le Vavasor, Mathew de Haversegg | m. for license of concord, Robert de Stradley, Hugo de Capella, Robert Tregos de Bildersthorp, Gilbert de Millers, Ingram de Stirap, Oliver le Foun, Elias Leverik, Wm. le Serjeant, Step Jorz, Mich TaiUefer de Blith and Gilbert le Sueer, Ernald de Riskinton, Wm. fil Michael de Langford, Robert de Stuteville, Nic de Eyvill, Robert de Finorers, Roger de M'cinton, Hubert de Freschville, Galf fil John de Newarc, Sibell, widow of Wm. de Sandford, Adam 230 THE PIPE ROLLS. de Eyvill, Wm. Brunig, Adam his brother, and Robert fil William, Alexr. de Rames, Simon de Everingham, Wm. de Startorp, Nose fil Ailmer de Houeton, Gilbert de Brunesley, Bened de Rolleston, Wm. de Buketon, Matilde de Framley, Henry de Heriz, Rad Bugge, Wm. de Sutton, Hugh de Pavelly, Elias de Jorz, John de Grey, Jord de Grendon, Nigel de Lang- ford S m. for disseizin Roger Duredent, Simon de Witenton, Magr. Will de la Fremunt, Peter de Cormerye, John Champion, Reginald Levesk, Will Cleric de Sibthorpe, Thos. fil Colun, Rad fil Maunsel, Rich de Blund de Heveringham, Jacob de Aldithley a debtor to Philip Lovel's estate, William Meysham (see Salop), Henry Putrel owes £6 of the debt of Benedict Pink, a ]&^fi, Wm. fil Andrew de. Grendon per Robert de Barenton (see Middx.), Wm. de Grey, Ad Kitte of Nottingham, Henry fil Ranulf de Reynesford living in Chaddesdon, Alan de Bethage, Richard de Coldhus and Adam his son, Richard de Schirburn, Wm. de Derle, Roger Mumby, who answers in York, Roger de Turke in Lancashire. pipe mo. 105, r. 11—45 liDenrg III. Simon de Aslocton, sheriff; John Bailliol and Simon DE HeddoN the last half-year. Amicia, widow of Roger le Clerk. pipe IRo. 106, r. 1—46 Ibenr? III. Robert de Halum, sheriff Hervie de Heckham and Isolde his wife ^^32 7s. gd. of the debt of Magr Robert de Shardlowe. Wm. Bridgeford de Shrievton, Wm. Gled, John Carner, Wm. le Tascur, Nic fil Hadleia, Robert atte Hill, Wm. Ingeham, John de Cantelupe, Wm. de Champion, Hugo de Rolleston, Will de Weston, Wm. de Champion, John de Cokfen, Wm. fil Rich, de Catun, Baldwin Wake, Galf fil Galf de North Carlton, Robert de Weston, Benedict de Rolleston, Hugo de Dokemanton and Letice his wife, Durand de Pessun and Alice his wife, Adam de Stanley, Elias de Stanley, Thomas fil William of Stanley, Wm. THE PIPE ROLLS. 23 1 Fusel, Peter fil Robert de Shelford, Galf de Dethec, Ralf fil Nicolas son and heir, Nicolas fil Roger paid for his relief, Alice fil Wm. Bate and Isabella her sister, Nic de Lindtorp, Wm. de Buckstanes, John fil Paulin de Stoke, Walter P. de Gamelston, Adam fil Hugh de Dokesworth, Henry de Uffeton, Isabella his wife, Wm. le Vavasor, Rich, de Bradmere, Rich, fil Wm. de Weston, Ran Le Teler and Matilde his wife, and Eva her sister, Alexr. de Rainines, Ralf fil Nicolas and Matilde his wife, Robert de Cokesend, Roger Croke, Galf de Childwick, Anker de Freshville, Rad de Halum, Robt. de Wragby, Galfry Martel, Richard Daniel, Magr S. de Walton, Robt. brother of Hy. de Brailsford, Wm. le Cupe, Henry le Foun, Thos. Rudding, Simon Wodrove, John Ledrie, Richard Pincun, Scac de Edmonston, Roger le Colier, Wm. fil Galf de Seggeshal, Rich, fil Ralf le Colier, Adam fil Hugh de Rokworth, Will Bukston, Rad Bugge, Henr de Heriz, Eudo de Mapleye and Thorn (svies), servants of Matilde de Stradlegh, Galf de Munby and Stephen le Marescal, Rich de Beneston and Johanna, near the Church of Gameston, Gilbert de Preston, Wm. de Sutton, Wm. fil Ralf de Trusselles. Wm. de Moun de Hokesvvorth, John fil John de Flintham, Wm. de Buketon, Thomas Bataylle, Alexr. de Stanton, Wm. le Reve de Stanton, Galf Pavel, Robert de Vilers and Wm. de Colston, Henry de Miggely (qy. Wiggely), diss. Rich de Berg and Roger de Weldon, Thos. de Leke, Wm. de Bradshawe, Godfrey de Keyworth, Wm. de Ken de Radcliff, Robert le Clerk de Cogham, Wm. de St. Andrew by the pledge of Robert de St. Andrew, Rich Spileman, Godfrey fil Anketin, Nic fil Robert de Lek. Robert de Ferrar, son and heir of Will de Ferrar, £4 for the farm of Wirksworth and Ashbourn, Hugh fil Ralf and Wm. de Cressy, Nich de Ewyas, Simon de Heddon ;£;20 for his debts. The Burgesses of Derby paid 10 m. for having a charter that no Jews or other Jew of the king, or his heirs, or by any other, shall henceforth remain or dwell in the town of Derby. pipe IR0. 107.-47 Ibenrg ill. NO NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 232 THE PIPE ROLLS. pipe iRo. 108.-4S Ibenr? iii. Magr Hy. Lovel, Nic. de Cantelupe and Eustacia his wife, Wm. fill Serle and Galf de Herdiberg, Wm. Spink, Hy. de Graham. NEW OBLATIONS. Robt. de Burstal, Beatrix de Barton, Rich de Trowell, John fil Nicolas de Ordeshall, Thos. fil Thos. Malet, Jordan de Kaysethorp, Wm. de Bretteville, Ad. le Vavasor, Walter de Gyseleir and Matilda his wife, Peter de Marseye, Walter de Kelum, Henr Dod, Henr le Gardin, Wm. fil Simon, John Russel V. Wm. de Touk, Nic de Underthorpe, John dell Hull, Roger de Somery, John le Taylor de North Leyrton, Henry Putrel, Felicia, widow of John Maunsel, Ralf fil Hugh and Sarra his wife, Robert fil Henry de Kelum, Will fil Hugh de Wiston, Hugh Travis de Alicton, Rich de Curzon, John de Holderness de Thornton, Nicolas fil Galfry Breton, Thomas Coly, John de Craunford and Alice his wife, Rad de Normanville, Robert de Wilne, Thos. fil Rad de Carlton, John de Aburnum, and Avelina his wife, Galf fil Galfr de North Carlton, Rad Corbyn and Matilde his wife, Roger de Bedul, Rad fil Wm. de Haghe, Henry Kniveton and Sibella his wife, Robert fil Robert de Claworth, Robert Filiol de Mapelbec, Jordan de Kaylethorpe, Wm. de Wermington, Roger de Bretville, Wm. de Bretville, Thos. de Sexteneby, Rad fil Rich, de Boughton, Wm. de la Mus- champ, Wm. de Warmington, Simon de la Bek, and Hy. Robert le Port de Codington, Durand, the fisherman, Hy. Dod, by the bail of Wm. de Sutton, Walter de Kelum, Walter Payn, Luke de Seleby, William de Staynesby, by the pledge of Joscelyn de Steynesby, Magr. Gibb Cywe, Priest of the church, of Retford Robt fil Rad de Winefield, Robert Crich de Hocreton, Peter de Gisors, Hugh de Stapelford, Cleric Ad. de Everington, the heirs of John de Lexington, Adam Kitte de Nottingham, John Bedalme, by the pledge of Richard Bedalme de Ratcjiff Richard Cleric de Stirap, Wm. Bedalme, by the pledge of Robert fil John de Crophill, and Ran fil Ran de Radclive. THE PIPE ROLLS. 233 Robert de Malsover for Amice, his wife, by the pledge of Alex and Will fil Will de Kynesal, Nic. fil Warin, by the pledge of Will fil Nicolas de Arnhall and Roger de Hendeshill, Robert de Nuers, by the pledge of Ralf fil Odo de Colwic, and Hugh Propositus of the same. Robert Gille by the pledge of Ralf de Cromwell, John de Notton, Alan de Redmersthwaite and Hugode Redmersthwaite, and Gerard de Sutton, Alan Stuffin, Alan de Hagthorpe, and Wm. Bullye, Nigel de Redwar and Roger le Botiler, Magr. Paulinos de Bampton, 1 1 m. for having a market and fair in Tides- well (see Roll 35). Walter fil Richard, Executor of the will of Peter de Golding- ton. The Eari of Ferrars ;£38 by William Lovel. Tplpe mo. 109.-49 Ibenrs III. NO NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. pipe mo. IIO, r. 12.— 50 Ibenr? ill. Will fil Herbert, sheriff ; Henry, his son, and Hugo de Stapleford, for him, accounted iox jC^ijc) 5s. gd. bl. £,ip and IDS. tale for the farm of the county for the past year, and John de Grey as farmer, Reginald de Grey, his son, Hugo de Staple- ford, and the same Reginald the same sums for this year. Hugh fil Ralf de Derby, Wm. de Montgomery paid £\T. In stipends for two monks serving in the Chapel of St. Mary's, under the Castle of Nottingham, ;£6 and 20d., and for a certain Chaplain at St. James, outside the Castle, 50s., and a certain chaplain in the Castle of Nottingham SOs., and Walter Chaplain in Chapel of Birchland 40s, and 2 chaplains at Clipston c. s., and a certain chaplain at the little Chapel near the Chamber of the Queen at Nottingham Sos., a chaplain at Hareston 50s. Simon fil El de Wetteley, Robert le Norries, Ralf de Horberg, John de Heanor, John and Hugh le Rus, Henry le Clerk, Rich le Bretton, Gerard and Thomas de Furnival, Robert de Loking- ton, Ralf fil Ralfde Kyleburn, William Manlovel, Henr de 31 234 THE PIPE ROLLS. Gaund, Peter de Thornay, Magister Will de Clifford, Thos. fil Robt. de Blye, Gerard de Rhodes and Isabella his wife, Henry fil Mich de Baukewell,and Robert fil Thorkeyn, Robert fil Mathewde Kingston, and Mathew de Baukewell, Robert de Stuteville, Roger de Luvetot, Wm. fil Wm. de Meysham, Wm. de Haluton, Gilbert de Pincelbec, Robert de Ferrar, Wm. de Stalington, Hugo de Stapelford, Robt de Lathum, Hy. de Kniveton. Charters granted to Nottingham and Derby are inscribed upon the Roll, releasing each town from the payment of lOOS. annually to the King, for which Nottingham gave the King 50 marcs. pipe IR0. 111—51 ibenrs in. NO NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. pipe mo. 112—52 Ibenrs HI. NO NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. pipe Bo. 113, r. 16, 17 an& 18.-53 ibenrs m. Reginald de Grey, Hugo de Stapleford, sheriffs for the 5 1 St year; SiMON DE Heddon and GERARD, his son and heir, for him for this year and the past year, made the usual pay- ment for the county ; nothing in the Treasury for the two past years. NEW OBLATIONS. Robert de Ferr, Earl of Derby, rendered composition of one golden chalice (i pott aur) and M. D. m. for the goodwill of the king (bona voluntate et gratia). This is a very curious entry. It is almost the only instance found in the Rolls of a present made in kind. No doubt it was intended to conciliate the king. John de Baliol ^22, Wills fitz Herbert 19s. Lawrence fil Robert Ingram, Nicolas de Campton, Adam fil Thomas de Stapleford, Rich. Daniel, Richard Frenia de Lendal, John de Rye and Johanna his wife for having assize, Rich de THE PIPE ROLLS. 235 Stiveton, Rad de Normanville for having assize, Wm. le Wyte, Nicolas de Stapelford, Hugo deTickhill, Rog. de Mcinton, Thos. de Tanburg, Robert Wascelin, Alice de Ippeston, Henry le Norreys, Galf de Dethic, Rich de Lenedale, Henry fil Robert de Tideswell, Walter fil Humphry de Douchmaler Eudo Mepple, Havise, widow of John Russel, Gilbert de Brunesley, Hugo de Stapleford, son and heir of Richard, paid his relief ; Henry de Sibthorpe, Mag. Henry le Ken, John de Eyvile, John de Hasteng, Robert Daft and Cecil his wife, Havise, widow of Robert Deincourt, Hocetta, widow of Ralph, Philip fil Elie Plantfolie, Henry de Mapelton, Will Bugge de Nottingham, Will Sault, Matilde, widow of Ralf de Bradley, Rd. de Lunedale, Margaret, widow of John fitz Herbert, Robert de Almeton and Wimarc his wife, Wm. de Langford and Johanna his wife, Horenta, widow of Ralf Dannett, and Rich fil Walter de Middleton, John de Sutton, Wills Salveyn, Ralf Bugg, Robert de Derley, Gervase fil Robert de Beston, Robert de Swinefield, Math Thorard, Adam de Savil and Sibel his wife, Mathew de Gresley, Robert le Breton, Alan fil John de Treton and Alice his wife, Alan de Trengeston, John Picot, Adam fil Galfry de Rutindon, Nigel de Bulcote, Wm. de Cully, Alan de Beltoft, Rad fil William le Hunt, Rich de Keriel, Simon fil Gervase de Gretton, John fil John de Wanton, Robert de Rampton, William de Meesham, Roger Millet, Wm. Kemp, William fil Richard le Clerk, Dionis, widow of Robert Motun, Robert de Sherland, Thom fil Robert de Donington. Thomas le Archer, William and Richard de Grey c. s. pledges Rich de Hemington, Roger de Stopham, Robt. Wascelin, Robert fil William de Braitoft and Gilbert fil Robert, Hugo le Provost, Wm. Basingfield, John de Rye fined los. for false claim (that is he was non-suited in his action). Nic le Juvene Bailiff of Derby, John de Oketon, Walter de Heling, Rad de Reresby Coroner, Wm.de Walkingham, Robt. de Willoughby, John de Lek Coroner, John de Nevil, brother and heir of Hugh, paid £\2 for having the farm of Arnal (part of the ancient demesne of the Crown). Eliza and Annora, daughters and heirs of Wm. le Vavasor, ^60. 236 THE PIPE ROLLS. pipe mo. 114—54 Ibenrs III. NO NOTTINGHAM OR DERBY. Ipipe mo. 115, r. 18 an& 19.— 55 Ibenrg III. Sheriff, HUGH DE Stapelford, cleric, for the year, 54; Walter, Archbishop of York ; HUGH for him for this year. NEW OBLATIONS. Elias de Bradene, Hugo Hert, Will fil Will le Ostrecer, Roger Melloc and Walter le Marescal, Robert de Misterton, Galf le Chapelayn, Jordan de Buregat, Lucia de Misters, Andrew fil Ben, Math fil Walter de Farendon, Rich fil Rich de Gretton, John fil Ralf de Erleston, Rado Bugge, Hugo fil Richard de Beliomonte, Robert and Ralf de Staunton, Robt. Crokhorn, Hug Kenet, Simon Haidened and Hugo his brother, Robert le Bretun de Walton, Walter de Bakepuz and Henry de Charlthorpe, Alan de Winton, Roger Melloc, John de Nottinghani and Margerie his wife, Mag Rad de Huwell, Robert Morin, Gilbt de Ginesle, Will fil Will de Kirkelston, Ad fil Richard de Strettonjohn fil Adam le Fleming, Will Harehill, Will fil Jordan and Doda his wife, and Emma la Petite, Galfry Dethic, Emma, widow of John de Rocheford, and Rad Rich de Walton, Henry fil Petronelle de Laxton, Henry fil Jordan de Nottingham, Rich de Saxi, Wills de Bella Aqua, Sarra, widow of Goceling de Eyvill, Ad de Gretewyz and Margerie his wife. Rich de Lenedale, John le Clerk de Okeneston, Henry de Heryz, Ralf fitz Will de Kirtcelston, John fil William de Cozmrya, Walter fil Robert de Strelly, Mathew Godwyn, Galf de Cressy, Robert de Handsacre, Eva fil Wm. Nayse, Will de Fledburg, Eudo de la Laund, John Conquest, Alice Dengurest, John de Dive, Rad de Snerton, John le Botiler, Will de Knapton and Mabilia his wife, John Ferebrato, Rad fil Rad de Worcet, Walter de Strelly, Robert fil Robert de Strelly, Nigel fil Ric de Stretton, Robert and Will his brothers, John de Brelond, Peter de Brimington, Elen fil Thos. de Quap- lode, Robert fil Alice de Carlton, Thos. de Furnival, Hugo de Odingselles, Willo de Cressy de Hodsac, Will fil Ingram THE PIPE ROLLS. 237 Kidwald, Robt. de South Muscam, John de Kirketon, Rich de Paveley, Richard Achard and Agnes his wife, Wm. Bou, Hasculf Musard, Rad de Radvul and AHce his wife, Robert le Carpenter, Robt de Yolgreve Clicus, John de Stokes, Nicolas Mokus de Newark, Henry le Gaunt and Eustace his wife, Henry Schiening and Beatrice his wife, Robert de Perers, Henry de Huton, Hugh de Swetely, Roger fil Willi de Langeford, Wills de Bradmere, John Foyne de Bradmere, Will fil Rich Alastre, John de Lek, Wm. Daft, Wm. de Trowell, Rogs (?) de Deredeston, John de Bosco and John Atteput, Hugo fil Thos le Gardin, Thorn fil Thom Hancelin, Wm. fil Henry de Mersinton and Agatha his wife, John Potloc, Rob Bozun, Robt. de Glamorgan, Henry Jordan and Margerie his wife, Breton, Roger de Marisco, Alice fil John de Kingeston, Alan de Beltoft, Robert de Keke (?), John de Lerewigg, Wm. Dutci, Robert Wildgos, Gilbt. de Brunesle, Ralf fil Jordan de Betton, Will fil Rich de Stretton, Walter de Beltoft, J. de Oketon, Walter de Helm, J. le Moyne Escheator. pipe IRo. 117, r. 9—TLbc first gear of Iking ]E&war&, son of fbenrg. Walter, Archbishop of York, answers for the farm of the county. The men of Nottingham were fined 10 m. and the men of Derby 5 m. for not appearing at the profer (profrum) of the Exchequer by any bailiff, etc., at the sheriff's computation. (See Roll 1 10 releasing them from this necessity.) Wm. de Morton, Wm. Barri, Wm. Brien, Wm. le Chaundeler, John Normanton, Isabel de Everingham, John le Sauvage, Henry fil Robert de Tideswell, Gerard de Hedon, Nigel fil Richard de Stretton. NEW OBLATIONS. Galfr de Stradley, Galf de Musters, Robert de Crokehorn, Nic Wake, Henr de Hotot, Rad de Rempston, Mathew de Kniveton, Galf de Arderne, Alan de Lenoreis, Stephen Manluvel, Thos. de Lyes Rado le Wyne, Gilbert de la Lathe, Robert de Walton, Andrew fil Wm. de Beldeston, Henr le Notreis and Matilde his 238 THE PIPE ROLLS. wife, Agnes fil Thos. Haunselin, Robert Race, Felicia Prioress of Cateby, Gvas de Rotington, Wm. fil Roger of the same, Hugh fil John de Sutton, Wm. de Thornhawe, Oliver de Odingselles and Margaret his wife, Andrew fil Ben and Cecile his wife, Wm. de Holbrok, Robt. de Waddesley, Roger de Fancourt and Emma his wife, Nicolas de Insula, Margt, widow of Rich, de Walton, Mathew de Goushill, Wm. fil Wm. de Maresei, Rich, de Barneby, Peter Tulc, Will de Grendon, Edith fil Emma de Macworth, Robert Pain and Amflig his wife, Rich, le Lou de Morle, Elia le Feur, Rad de Sumcote, Wm. de Auburn, Robert de Knittel and Alina his wife, John de Heriz, Rad Barri, Rog. Brun, Rich, de Houton, Roger fil Wm. de Swinderley, Richard de Shirburn, Wm. de Cressy, Michael de Spinghill, Wm. de Folville, Rad de Rempston, Roger Millot, Henry Knotting, Alan de Beltoft, Walter de Bottisford ix. m. for the rents of the lands of Ralf Basset in Colston, Ralf, son and heir of the same Ralf, Adam fil Hugh de Doggeworth, Roger Beler, Adam de Everingham, Walter de Ludham, Robert de Herdlawe, Henry de Leverton. NO ROLLS FOR 2 AND 3 EDWARD I. Ipipe TRo. 120, r. 3—4 ]E5war& L Walter de Stirchesle, sheriff for that and the preceding year, the ARCHBISHOP OF YORK for the second year prior thereto accounted for ^279 53. i id. bl., and ;^40 los. tale the farm of the county, and ^^558 us. lod. bl. and ;^8i tale for the two preceding years. Alan de Beltoft, Roger fil Robert, Robert and Hugh his brothers, executors of the will of John de Grey. NEW OBLATIONS. Will Wildegos, W. de Stuthest, Walter le Freeman, Wm. de Appleby, Nic fil Robert le Wine, Robert de Molineton, Robert de Hardreshill, Laurence Ingram, John fil Richard de Trowell, Rad de Bosco i m. for having a writ, Nic le Breton, Gilb. de Bekingham, Stephen de Arnhal, Thom de Mapelton, Roger Milot, Walter le Mareschal, Wm. de Bradmere, Robert Arche- THE PIPE ROLLS. 239 baud, Walter le Bachelor, Rich, in the Lane, Rich le Brazur, Roberta la Fontaine, Hugo Hagge, Rad de Wandesley and Rad le Breton, John de la Corner de Derby p. pi. Abbot de Burton, Roger fil Wm. de Wimpton, Ad de Gerbaud and Rich his brother, Nicolas Wake, Wischard de Charrun and W. de Nortburg, Bald Wake, Walter fil Walter de Ludham, Robert fil Hugh de Thorlaveston, Galf Blome de Langford, Mathew de Kniveton, Galf de Hockhanger, Michael de Mile, Henr de Perpoint. Ralf Pipard, nephew and heir of Robert fil Nicolas, paid his relief for land held in capite. Oliver de Langford, son and heir of Nigel, do. Walter de Langel, son and heir of Galf, do. Will de Colwic, son and heir of Philip, do. Rad fil Rad de Kilburn, Robert and Roger Wascelin, Robert de Handesacre, Wm. de Bradmere, Galf de Gresley, Wm. fil Herbert, whom the Prior of Semplingham should warrant for his serjeantry in Trowell. Wm. Darel, kt. (miles) of the County of Nottingham, accounted for ;^20 for debts of Joscei Bullock de Lincoln ; Thos. Norman- ville of Hareston Castle, Rich, de Vernon in Pichecote, William Brito in Bucks., Rad le Ragged, Wm. de Adridele and Rob del Vou, Robert de Tibetot accounts for the rents of the castle of Nottingham, Wm. de Bella Aqua, the heirs of Rad Freschville, Nic de Espigurnel, John de Vilers, Robert de Kinctwich, Wm. fil Wm. de Clippeston, Robert de Raback the land of Hugh Pyn, Walter fil Hugh de Lovered, John fil Hugh de South Lenton, Henr fil Walter le Feure, Robert le Carpenter, John his son, Robt. de Cressele, Wm. de Hauton, Robert Nonne, Will Cragge, Wm. de la Strete, Hugo fil Wm. de Bingham, Cecil, widow of Paulinus, John de Stapelford. pipe no. 121, r. 4.-5 ]E&war& L Walter de Sterchele, sheriff. Thomas fil Robert de Blie paid his relief. Heirs of Henry de Esseburn. 240 THE PIPE ROLLS. NEW OBLATIONS. Alan de Beltoft, Roger de Stradle, John de Venella, Henr Cermet, Nic de Derle, Henr fil Mathew de Kniveton, Walter de Kniveton and Nic de Boketon, Wm. le Blund de Blythe, John Dive de Balderton, Henr de Bakepuz, Hy. de Ossington, Walter de Furneus, Reginald de Filingham, Rico de Kelum, Robert fil Robert de Strelly, Kelve de Hemingburg, Rad de Eccleshall, John de Rodes, Alex de Maris, John Hunger- fel, Robert fil Henry del Hill, Walter de Quilli, Rad Torchard, Richard Boliz of Flintham, John de Stoke, Godwin de Rochel, Wm. de Calverton in Sewell, Will Baret, Hy. de Showe, John de Hocreton. Wm. de Eyvill de Egmanton, Robert de Eyvill, Clem de Lungvilers, Rad de Wilford, Rad de Wilford de Nottingham, Philip Keriel and Robert his brother, Hy. de Karlstorp and Wm. de Upton, Roger Murci de Retford, Alice de Wilington, Walter de Muscamp, John de Fulbec, Stephen Manluvel, William Bardolf, son and heir of Wm. of Stoke. Iptpe IRo. 122, r. 18—6 E5war& I. Walter de Sterchesle, sheriff. Thom de Normanville answered for the rents of Hareston. NEW OBLATIONS. Philip de Stanley, Robert Pescur de Shelford, Ralf fil Thos de Bobenhill, Will de Meynil, Robt. de Acour, Henry de Sibetorp, Robt. de Wolrington, Will Faleise, Robt. de Heming- worth, Robt. de Tibetot, Hugo de Lynacre | m. for having an assize. Will de Andredel and Robert del Vou (.'') 240 m. for arrears of the farm for the mines of Wirksworth. William de St. Patric £^8 14s. 8d., Robert de Salceto, Wm. Bassett, Walter de Hertwell, Milo de Melton, Bailiff of the Wap of Repingdon p. Thom de Luvetot, Richard de Grey, son and heir of Will de Grey £i36g 12s. id. (See Lincolns.) THE PIPE ROLLS. 24 1 pipe IRo. 123, r. 13 anC> 12—7 ]Ebwar5 I. NEW OBLATIONS. Wm. and Roger de Wendesley, Rann le Ken, Richard Bugge, Margt. widow of Rad de Rerisby, Robert de Strelly, Robert de Saucheverel, Wm. de Eton, Thos. le Poer, Robert le Wyne, Wm. Egrum, John de Sibtorp, Rich Kvriel, Robert fil Adam de Aldesworth, Rico de Shireburn, William de Bekingham, Wm. Folefaunt, Wm. de Stokes, Hamon de Sapton, Wm. fil Ralf Barry, Bate fil Pelle, Hugo de Acour, Robert le Breton, Rich de Barrington, Rich de Curcun, R. de Hengham, Wm. de Freskenade, Robert de Shiresle, Adam fil Wm. Darling, Wm. Truelove, Robert de Stoke, I. de Luvitot. PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF THE SCUTAGE OF WALES ASSESSED AT 40s., AS CONTAINED IN THE ROLL OF 43 HENRY III. Robt. de Stradle i fee, Rico Briton i, Galf de Ecclesdon i. Rich de Stapelford, Hugo fil Ralf de Gresle 3, Wm. de Morton 3, Philip de Kime i, Hugo fil Ralf, Rich de Wiverton I, John de Heriz 4, Robt. de Sibtorp ^, Ralf de Wyleby ^, Mathew de Haverseth i, Philip de Ulecote, . heir of Robert fil William 3, Wm. House i, John de Monteacuto i, Robert de Salceto i, Walter de Hertwell i (Bernard de Hertwell), Hugo de Havers- ham I, Hospitallers i. Will de Dufton i, John de Bellocampo i, Wm. Basset l^, Peter de Goldington 4, Nic Abbe 2, Bolsover 2|, heirs of Robert de Essebi 3, Robert de Pavelly 4, Galf de Sauk- ville I, Wm. de St. Patric 3. OF THE SAME IN THE COUNTY. Emma de Bellofago l, Robert son and heir John de Stuteville i'5, Wm. Bardolf 25, heirs of Wm. Briwere 3 in Chesterfield, 10 of Roger Buron's, Rad Musard 15, Robert de Chauces i, heirs of Wm. Albini 2, Hy. de Mcfeud iV> heirs of Rich de Grey 6, Hy. de Grey in Thorington, Hon of Pevrel, Edmund de Aincourt |, John de Neville ^, Hugo de Nevill i, Rad de Freschville ij, 32 242 THE PIPE ROLLS. Adam de Everingham (heirs of Thorn de Birkin) £24., Edmund, brother of the king ;^262,;^I0 for Earl Ferrar in Heyham I, and I fee of Wm. de Ferr, and of 68^ of the Earl of Ferrars, and of 60 fees and 3 pts of i of the Countess of Ewe. pipe IH0. 124, r. 2.-8 J£bwar& I. Gervase de Clifton, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. Richard son and heir Rich de Grey. Roger de Brunesley, son and heir, Gilbert de Brunesley, for his relief as in the preceding roll, Robt de Rempston, Robert de Meering, Wm. de Reygate. Robert Tibetot £60 for the farm of the Town of Nottingham. Ran de Rye, son and heir of John de Rye, who held of the Bishop of Lincoln, and whose relief belonged to the King on account of the vacancy of the Bishopric, then in the King's hands. This relief results from half a Knight's fee in Wardeby, and 2 Knights' fees in Gosberchurch. Hugo de Stapelford ;£'I39 19s. id. for many debts (see in Bucks). Peter Picot 5 n^- fine for replevy p. pi. Simon de Creye, Simon, his son, Ralf Pull and Lucy de Thorny. Robert de Melburn. pipe IRo. 125, r. 8—9 E&warO I. Gervase de Clifton, sheriff. Tenants of the land of Philip de Ulecote, per Rich de Stanford, Roger de Arcy ;!^2i 19s. 9d., Norman de Stirap ;^i8 2s. 5d., Elias Drury 21s. 2d., The Earl of Warren 19s., Ingr fil Roger le Clerk 46s. gd., Thomas fil Robert de Blie los. fi^d., Ingram fil Roger de Stirap 38s. 2|d., Prior of Blith 34s. Sd., Abbot de Rupe 155. 9d., John Mimet Ss. 8|d., Rich de Stirap 9s. yd., Walter le Chamberleng 17s. 2^d., Robert de Frychbeck 2s. lojd., Prior de Mares Ss. 8^6., Adam fil Walter de Park 3s. lod., Henr. THE PIPE ROLLS. 243 Atty 3s. lod., Thos. fil Stephen 3s. gd., Matilde ux Robert Scot 3s. 9d., Hy. Braciator de Blyth 3s. gd., Roger Tinctor 8s. yd., John le Forester I4id., Nic Tailefer i4Jtd., Abbot de Welbec 653. 3id., Gervase de Wilford Vic ;^ 15, John de Nevill c. s. NEW OBLATIONS. Wm. de Hamelton and Adam Frenis. John de Heckham holds the land which was Robert de Shardlow's. Wm. de Steynesby in recompense for his horses which he lost in the service of King Henry, 10 m. Robert, son and heir Adam de Everingham, for his relief Ipipe no. 126, r. 11—10 E&warO I. Gervase de Clifton, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. Thom de Lanum and Thom fil Alexander fil Wm. de Linton and Robert, his son, Will fil Fulk de Hedon, Ranulf fil Hugh de North Leirton, Elias fil Wm. de Upton, Wills de Raden, Rich de la Sale de Wardeston, Robert his son, and Hugo de la Sale. Thom de Furnival ;£'20 fine, pledges Rad Cromwell, Rad de Wodburg, Peter Picot, Walter de Gousel, Richard de Bingham, Thom Foljambe, Wm. Hamelton, Gilbert de Thornton. The Sheriff accounts for ^^42 for the chattels of John de Rye, and lod. for his fair. Elias de Sutton ;£io of the goods of the same John. Robert de Acra, Wm. de Steynesby in recompense from the County for the horses which he lost through his service with King Henry, 10 m. Walter de Pinkeny and Robert de Wauncey for wards belong- ing to the Castle of Windsor, John de Wateley. Henr de Perepoint £8 los. received from the vill of Wicheton, for the property of (evas) a certain unknown woman, Hugo de Rodmerthwait, and Rad Manfield. Gervase de Wilford (sheriff) c. s. for a contempt. 244 THE PIPE ROLLS. John de Hecham held the lands which were Robert de Shardlow's. John de Nevill c. s. for a default. Norman Darcy and Ralf his brother, mentioned in Lincoln- shire roll. IPfpe IRo. 127—11 Ebwarb I. Gervase de Clifton, sheriff. Wm. de Addredesle in Wirksworth. Wm. de Hertwell, Rich de Wiverton. Thomas Foljamb cccc. m. for the farm of the Castle and the honour of the Peak, to hold at the like farm from St. Mich. Term, for ix. years complete saving to the king wardships, and reliefs from knights' fees, and the greater Serjeantries, and the pleas of suit before the Justices of Assize, which rightly belong to such Justices. pipe flo. 128, r. 23.-12 ]E5war& i. Gervase de Clifton, sheriff. The corpus of this county is not noted here, but in the Rolls in which are inserted the returns for all the counties of England. Robert le Fere. Thomas Foljamb 8oo m., arrears of the farm of the Castle and Honour of Pec. Roger le Bret and Sarra his wife, one of the heirs of the widow of Walter de Bottesford, for relief for her lands. NEW OBLATIONS. Benjamin le Hunt, Bailiff of Nottingham, Wm. Brun, Bailiff of Derby, Hugo de Collingham, Gervase de Wilford, I m. for the rents of the land of Edmund de Eyncourt. Thomas de Cachehors, Peter de Chester, Hy. ad Fontem, Adam fil Insrich, Emma, widow of Tho fil Rann v. Cecil, widow of John de Sandiacre, now wife of Peter de Chester. THE PIPE ROLLS. 24S Thomas de Claworth c. m. for taking a bissa (a Hind). Wm. and Ralf Sampson were fined for the same offence. The heirs of Peter de Clumber and Will fil Gode, and Henry de Wellawe, William de Meynil, Wm. de Fenton, John fil Wm. de Fenton, Will de Alsop, Nigel fil Rich de Stretton, Wm. fil Roger de Strelly, Roger de Blida de Carlton and Beatrice his wife, John de Aldewerke, Galf de Bourton, Walter and Hugh de Hampton, Rich fil Wm. de Bernebi, Robert de Trusley, Roger Durdent, Rad Barri, John de Pilecote, John Geldsboure, John de Crumford, Wm. fil Wm. le Herberiour, Thos fitz Herbert, Walter Godinghert, Juliana, widow of Wm. de Fenton, Cecil and Alice her daughters, Galf de Godington de Tukeford, Rich de Weston, Lodosa, widow of Rad Finder, Simon Kay and Robt Grace, Hugo de Babington, £8 levy of the vill of Eckington, and Wm. de Steynesby of the gift of King Henry £8. Robert de Mapleton and Rad de Wadsleich. Wm. de Wimpton and Rico Gerebant, John de Fulhelm and Robt Brun in Walkeringham, John de Venel de Flouberg, John de Lexington, John de Oketon, Robert de Salceto, Oliver Foun, Rich Busson. Wm. Meynil, son and heir of Philip Meynil, his relief due. Ro// No. 129 does not belong to this series. pipe IR0. 130, r. l— 13 ]E&war& I. Gervase de Clifton, sheriff. Robert fil Adam de Everingham paid his relief. Walter de Montgomery £8 \ m. as in preceding Roll. NEW OBLATIONS. Giles de Menyl, Thomas Dannet, Rad Wyne, Robert le Wyne and Margaret his wife, Hugo Bonserjeant, Hugo de Upton, Capel- lanus, Henr de Verdun, Peter de Campana, Thos. de Bouinton, Gilbert fil Galf de Blie, Thos. fil Galfred de Chaddesdon, Henr Coudray, Wm. Bertram de Bingham, Lucya de Musters, John de Snipston, Rico Brayne and Emma his wife, Thom de Chams, Wm. fil Robert de Kilmington, Godfrey fil Robert de Stanton, Thos. de Gatehurd, Nic Wal and Is his wife, Richard Hervy, Nic de Coveland, Henr de Hotoft, Oliver de Langford and 246 THE PIPE ROLLS. Walter de Gousel, Willo Gunt, Elizabeth, widow of Roger Kellesholt, Will de Hagh, Rico Russel de Blida, Henry fil Thomas le Clerk de Hopton, Thorn de Ondesley, Rich fil Rich Bugge, Hugh fil Hugh de Meynil, Roger de Brunesley, Robert Petit de Suth Muscamp, Andrew fil Benedict de RoUeston, Wm. Mareste de Wodburg, Rico de Esseburn, Elyas de Staunton, Will de Minsterton, Wm. Ailwyn, Philip de Wyleby, Nic de Stapelton, Elias de Bekingham, Thos Gundy, Wm. fil Robert de Edens- towe, Thos de Clapwell, Ranulf de Makeney, Bailiff of Derby, Hugo de Babington, Roger de Boteler de Stoke, Ralf Rempeston, Alan le Noreis, Robert de Rerisby, Rico le Chamberlain, Thos Attewro de Rolleston, John le Bretun, Hugo Brun, Will Wyne, Robert fil and heir Robert de Strelly, Robert de Mering, Hugo Creveceur, Wm. de Melburn, John Daggel, Mich de Leik, Wm. Bate, Wm. de Longford and Johanna his wife, Wm. de St. Andrew, Robert de Yolgrave clericus, Humf Bouchmaler. Thom le Clerk de Gretton and Alan de Wermunhill executors of the will of Thomas Foljambe. Nicolas de Balingel custodian of the court of the king at Peak. Nigel de Langford and Rad Gousel heirs of Mathew de Hathersage. pipe mo. 131, r. 2—14 JE&warb I. John de Anesley, sheriff. Laurence, son and heir of Laurence de St. John, for his relief Robert de Stuteville, son and heir of John de Stuteville, owed £50 of the scutage of Wales. NEW OBLATIONS. Wm. Brun, Bailiff of Derby, Alan le Paumer, Bailiff of Not- tingham, Thomas de Birde, heir of Richard le Ragged, John le Ranton, Robert Archer, Ad de Eyvill, Elias Leveric, Stephen de Coverham, Mich Wycher de Langford, Robert fil Wm. de Stafford and Henry de Chavendes, John fil Paul de Stokes, Rad de Burgo, Hy. de Kniveton and Sibella his wife, John fil Henry de Cotun, John de Stokes, Wm. Noble and dementia his wife, Thos. de Latham, Walter fil Wm. de West Draiton, Robert fil Robert de Thorleston, Rich de Kingesle, Walter de Stirchesle, THE PIPE ROLLS. 247 Rad de Gunthorpe, Johanna, widow of Wm. de Trowell, Alan de Trenkeston and Elena his wife, 40s. de Thomas Foljambe, Nigel fil Rd de Stretton, Rog de Tyresholt, Thorn Daniel! Robert de Cardoil and Jordan de Papewyk, Thorn de Ferrars, Robert fil Richard de Herdreshill and Bertha, Nicolas de Widmerpol, Robert fil Henry de Breylesford, William fil Ralf de Trussels, Roger Estrange. IPfpe no. 132, r. 25—15 ]E5warb I. John de Anesley, sherifif. Robert de Stuteville accounted for 250 m. for defect of service of two knights in the army of Wales in the year xi. The king received ;^20 for him from John de Biron on account of half the manors of Barlbro and Whitewell, which Oliver de Lange- ford held of him. THE SECOND SCUTAGE OF WALES ASSESSED AT 40s., AS IN ROLL OF THE YEAR 7. Robert de Strelly i, Rich Briton i, Galf de Eccleston i, Rich de Stapelford, Hugh fil Ralf de Gresley 3, Wm. de Morteyn 3, Philip de Kime ^, Rd. de Wiverton i John de Heriz 4, Robert de Sibtoft |, Rad de Wileby J, Mathew de Haverseth i, Philip de Ulecotes of the heirs of Robert fil William 3, Wm. House i, John de Monteacuto i, Robt. de Salceto i, Walt de Hertwell i, (Bernard de Hertwell) i, Hugo de Haversham i, Hospitallers i, Wm. de Dufton i, John de Bellocampo li, Wm. Basset ij, Peter de Goldington 4, Nich Abbe i fee in Empingham, Rutland, I in Kirby, Leic, Bolsover 2^, heirs of Robert de Essebi 3, Robert de Paveley 4, Gauf de Saukville i, Wm. de St. Patric 3, Robert de Hese i, Will de Cantelupe 3, the same of the county, Emma de Bellofago i, Robert, son and heir John de Stuteville, £SO for 10 fees, Wm. Bardolf 25, heirs of Wm. Briwere 3 fees in Chesterfield and 10 of Roger Buron, Rad Musard 15, Robert de Chauces i, heirs of Wm. Albini 2, Henr de Mcefeud i, Henry de Grey heirs of Rich de Grey 6, Henry de Grey in Thorington. 248 THE PIPE ROLLS. THE HONOUR OF PEVEREL. Edm de Aincourt J, John de Nevil i, Hugo de Nevill i, Rad de Freshville 15, Adam de Everingham heirs of Tom Birkin 12, Edmund the brother (of the king) £262 los. for I fee Com de Ferr in Heyham, i of Wm. de Ferr, and 68i of the Earl of Ferrars, and 60 and 3 pts. of I of the Countess of Ewe, and 2 fees for the manors of Wirksworth and Esseburn and the wap of Wirksworth. Wm. Aldridesle and Robert de Vou 640 m. for arrears of the farm of Wirksworth. Edmund Espigurnel (see Essex"). pipe IR0. 133, r. 8.— 16 ]E£)war& I. John de Anesley, sheriff. Constance de Byerne ;£^iiO for the manor of Wheteley, Rich de Ekelington and Laura his wife, Thomas de St. Philibert, Wm. fil Hugh Martin. Will de Meynil, son and heir of William (qy. Philip) de Meynil, deceased, fined for the relief of those lands which Pha his mother held in capite. (See Roll 12.) The heirs of William Marteyn and William le Hayles. NEW OBLATIONS. Mathew de Haversegge accounted for 20s. for scutage of Wales (p. heredes). Rich Martel, who married the elder daughter and heir of Robert Rabarci, of Clapton (Alice the other heir), paid relief as in the year 15. Andrew de Grendon paid his relief Robert de Stuteville ;^I00 for his relief for 15 fees, which he held in capite by barony. Nic de Ille (Insula) de Kirby owes 5 m. for a fine and I6 m. for the value of the same land in Walton-upon-Trent, which was in the hands of John Paris, a fugitive of the former year. Robert de Stuteville ;^20, which the king received by the hands of John de Biron for half the manor of Barlbro and Whitewell, which Oliver de Langford held. THE PIPE ROLLS. 249 Wm. le Tanur, Robert Gous, Rico de Eklington, Rich Russei, Tlios de St. Philibert, Wm. fil Hugh Martin, John Dek, Thos le Ragged, Rich de Monteburg, Baldwyn de Osemondesthorpe, Alfred de Sulney, John de la Corner, Bailiff of Derby, Rad le Taun, Bailiff of Nottingham. Simon de Nottingham, former Bailiff of Derby, ;^24 for the men of Derby for arrears of their farm, and the Burgesses paid 20 m. for re-having their town, which was taken into the king's hands because their bailiff did not attend the computation of the sheriff to answer for their farm. pipe IRo. 134, r. 31—17 )£5war& I. John de Anesle, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS. Hugh de Wirksop, Wm. de Yelegrave, Margaret de Byle. Ralf le Tavener, Bailiff of Nottingham, John le Corner, Bailiff of Derby, Thom. fil Robert de Bligh, relief The executors of Galfry le Nevill 40s. for fine taken of John le Vavasor, Prior of Selveston, Regin de Edenstowe. Nic Wake ;^20 for a venison trespass ; pledges, John de Brim- ington and John de Boterwic. Rad Sampson for the same, 10 m. ; pledges, Robert Pistor of Eperston, and Herbert fil Wm. de Wodburg, Robert de Newbold. Roland, parson of Egrum, ;^20 for the same trespass. Rich Neyrunt, Stephen Barry, Thos Barry, parson of Tyvers- holt, all fined for game trespasses. Gervase de Clifton v. Wm. le Botiller. Robert le Hore, son and heir of Peter le Hore, deceased, for relief (See year 16.) John le Fleming of Nottingham, 400 m. for the farm of High Peak. John de Bray and Wm. de St. Cruc, whom Cecil and Agnes, daughters and heirs of Robert de Marcham, married, relief. The executors of the will of Walter Gifford £2^ for the herbage and pannage of Beskwood. John, son and heir of Robert le Bret, for i rod of land in the field of Nettleworth. 33 250 THE PIPE ROLLS. Thomas fil Nigel de Redware land in Bulcote. Thomas fil Robert de Bligh paid relief, Ralf Tavernor, bailiff of Nottingham. pipe IRo. 135.-18 E&warJ) I. John de Anesley, sheriff. Rich de Nevil. NEW OBLATIONS. Gilbert fil Robert de Flinthorpe, Hugo fil Henry Muriel, for the rents of the land of Thom le Ragged and Margaret his wife, Havise, widow of John Savage, Roger de Vallibus, Rich de Cardun. Nic de Aldeleigh c. s. Henr de Wudborough and Rich Glade, executors of the will of Rad de Wudburgh ; Rad de Arnale, sheriff of Lines. ; Rich de Grey, son and heir of Will de Grey, owed ;^253 4s. 2^d., he also accounts for £70^ 2s. 6d. ; Bald Wake, John de Eyvil and Wm. de Huntingfield, ccc. ;^ for the rents of the Earl of Lincoln for the last quarter of the past year ; Edmond de Aincourt, Nic de Meynil, Robt. de Marcham, Robt. de Burstal, Ben de RoUeston, Rad Barri, Ph. de Coleville, Brian de Hardeley, Simon de Gringeley, Walter de Toke,Thom de BellaAqua,Galf de Staneton, Robert de Stokes, John de Villers, Rog de Alneto, Rich de Brun de Nortwell, Wm. fil Mai of the same. Ad fil Hugh le Cornfier, Wm. de Kinstan, Rob de Belegrave, Wm. de Montegom, Nic de Hamwyk, Rich de Heywyk, Galf de Manleye, Robt. Wylyay de Swindeby. pipe IRo. 136, r. 6— 19 ]EC)war& L Wm. de CadwoRTH (qy. Chaworth), sheriff. The scutage of the 15th year of this king is set out this year as if unpaid (as it is, subsequently), no knight having apparently paid any portion of it. It would seem probable that it had been farmed, and that the farmer had made default in payment, hence the Exchequer scribe repeats it till it is paid. It is impossible to suppose that all the knights omitted to pay their separate quotas. THE PIPE ROLLS. 251 NEW OBLATIONS. John le Foun, Galf de Bonham, Wm. fil Serlo de Lenton, Rich fil Rich Biigg, John fil Robert de Acour, John le Botiler de Hocreton, Elias de Bradmere, Thomas fil Thorn Foljambe, Henry fil Henry de Braylesford, Rich le Dun ; the rents of the land of Alice Foljambe, Wm. de Catclive, Henry de Kniveton, Roger de Brunesley ; the rents of Humphry Fauconberg in Cuckney; Thorn de Rempston, Robert de Stafford, John fil Rob de Acour, Gerard de Eton, John le Graunt de Hokesworth, John de St. Andrew, John de Heriz, Henry de Cama de Stokes, juxta Farenton and Isabelle his wife, Rico Bevereg, Ric Foliot, Robert fil John Burstal and Margaret his wife, Robert Bardolf and Lora his wife. pipe mo. 137, r. 2.-20 ]£5war& I. William de Schaddeworth, sheriff. Henr Gernun, John House of Oxton, Hugo de Heriz. NEW OBLATIONS. John de Eyville, Will de Pec, Hugo fil Henry Muriel, Nic le Moun, Jordan de Welley, Rico de Bernak, John fil Hugh de Cortinstock, Robert fil Henry de Breylesford. Galfry Dun de Breylesford, Robert Toke, Robert le Franceis. Peter de Braunford, John Ingram, Hugo de Heriz. Hugo de Somerville, Galf Dubraid de Alwaston. John TEsquire de Weston, Oliver de Langford. pipe IRo. 138, r. 19.-21 EDwarb i. Philip de Paunton, sheriff. Robert de Stutevill paid c. £ for his relief (as in Roll i6). Wm. de Lee, son and heir of Henry de Lee, paid his relief. (See Roll 19.) Robert fil Henry de Sterndale. NEW OBLATIONS. Rad de Eccleshall, Robert Daft and Matilde his wife, John fil Pauline de Stokes, Robert Bardolf and Nicolas le Sergeant, Wm. 252 THE PIPE ROLLS. Gernun, Hugo Parkin de CoUingham, John de Rye (see Lincoln Roll, Anno i6), pledge Robert le Chaumpenys, Rad Basset of Sapecote, Robt. de Kym, Wm. Peyn de Rotington, Rad de Morwood, Rad de Lisurs, parson of Fledborough. Wm. de Colwic, late justice at the gaol of Nottingham, £i6 for fines in the year 2i. Roger de Vallibus. John fil and heir Elie de Sutton. The scutage of the 15th year of the king is again set out in this roll as if still unpaid. pipe IRo. 139, r, 12.-22 ]E5war& I. Philip de Paunton, sheriff. Gerard de Rhodes 4 m. of the rents of Langar, Simon de Clifton, bailiff of Wirksworth. Herbert de Gredlee. Robert de Stutevill ;:^20 for disseizin. William Halley, cousin and heir of Wm. Halley, paid for his relief (as in the year 22) of all lands of Wm. his grandfather. Eleanor, widow of John de Longvilliers (see in Lancashire.) Philip de Paunton accounted for £^^ 19s. 6|d. of the goods of Rich de Franceis of the itinerary, of Hugo de Cressingham, in county Westmoreland, Anno 21. pipe no. 140, r. 4.-23 Ebwar5 I. Walter de Goushill, sheriff. Robert Tibetot owed i!"iOO received from the wardrobe of the king by the hands of Gervase de Clifton for the works on the castle of Nottingham. Rich Huteman 430 m. of the farm of High Peak. ■ Roger Darcy paid ^20 los. 3d. of the debt of Philip de Ulecotes. NEW OBLATIONS. John Clarel, Nich Roys, Thom de Bolsover, Rad Sparwac, Peter de la Leghe, John de Langeton, John de Rempston, bailiff of Nottingham ; Robt. de Thorwych and Wm. Wythem, Rich THE PIPE ROLLS. 253 de Bingham, Galf Bugge and William de Collingham, Wm. Hauward, justice assigned to take pleas in divers counties. (This was the ancestor of the Ducal House of Norfolk). pipe IRo. HI, r. 20 an& 27—24 ]E&war5 i. Walter de Goushill, sheriff, John de Harrington last half-year. NEW OBLATIONS. John le Fleming, Margaret fil Ralf Orderich, Henry fil Gilbert de Rolleston, Thom de Peverwys, Peter Picot, junior, Robert fil Andrew de Rolleston and Beatrice his wife, Rd. de Kingesleye, John fil Rich de Totington, Thos. fil Thos. Foljambe, John fil John de Stapelford. Adam fil Adam Hamelton. Philip, son and heir of Hugh de Staveley, ;^30 for license to marry whom he pleased. Jordan de Sutton, fil and heir of Gerard de Sutton, paid his relief, as in Roll 32. John, brother and heir of Edmond Spigournel, paid his relief Henry de Chaddesdon, Henry de Rolleston. Robert de Hardreshill. Wm. Botel de Middleton. Ricus le Slegh and Adam le Slegh. Ralf fil Henry Cotel. Helewise, widow of John Picot, Nic de Idle (Insula?) de Kirkby. Magr. Andrew de Ashbourn. Thos. de Chaworth, kt. lord of Markham, owes £"] for the goods of Reginald de Neville, Hugo Alibon, and Hugo de Gringeley. pipe IR0. 142, r. 12.-25 Bbwarb I. Walter de Gousel, sheriff; John de Harrington for the last half year. 254 THE PIPE ROLLS. NEW OBLATIONS. Richard fil John de Thorpe, Henry Gambyn de Deneburg, Gervase le Clerk in Thornhill and Felice his wife (this person may not have been in holy orders ; a counsellor or lawyer of the period would be described as a clerk) ; Robert de Pagemore, Thorn de Horsley, Cap. Robert Nurry, Mager fil Fulc de Leirton, Henry de Kniveton, Rico Fysche, Hugo de Rokesley, Rico Proudfot, Robert Dethic and Hugh fil Ade, Hugo de Hanleye, Robert fil Stephen de Witinton. Ralf fil Henry Cotel, Helewise widow of 'John Picot ;^20 for license to marry herself to whomsoever she pleased. John de Rocheford, Robert fil Walter de Aslacton, John and Margaret Fitz Walter of the same, Will de Meynil. Ralf Muntjoie, Hugh de Babington, Thomas de Chaworth, John de Anesly, Magr. Andrew of Ashbourne. John de Chaddesdon, bailiff of Derby. Thorn de Foljambe, bailiff of High Peak. Simon, son and heir, Wm. Leverton. Henry fil Wm. Fitz Herbert. Robert de St. Licio, who married Matilde, sister and one of the heirs of John de Stokes ; Ad, son of Agnes, cousin and other heir of the said John. Relief for lands of John, brother of the said Matilde, and Agnes, who died the 21st year of the king. pipe iFlo. 143, r. 10-26 ]E&war5 i. John de Harington, sheriff the first half year ; Rad de Shirley the last. NEW OBLATIONS, Etc. Robert de Acour, Robert de Reresby and Johanna his wife, Hamon fil John de Sapton, Roger fil Robert de Melner, Wm. de Ingerby and Albreda his wife. Henry de la Chambre, Thomas de Bockestones. John fil Norman, Roger de Arcy, Hugo de Babington, John de Anesly, Wm. Beutel, Peter Picot. Philip Paunton answered for the rents of Wm. Foljambe (see Rolls i8 and 19), and the rents of Thos. le Bretun, Henry THE PIPE ROLLS. 255 de Kniveton, Henry de Rolleston, Wm. de Drayton, Simon Cadyn, Hugh de Bekingham, Thorn de Fornival, Rich Furneus. Baldwyn Wake, Hugo de Vienna, Rad Freschville, Wm. Slagge de Stikethorp, Roger de Botesford, Edm de Eyncourt. Wm. Manderell of Bekerton. Robert le Jorzs and Emma his wife, hcense for concord with Walter de Osevill. pipe IFlo. 144, r. 5.-27 ]E&war& i. Ralf de Shirley, sheriff. NEW OBLATIONS : FINES AND AMERCIAMENTS. Simon de la Croys de London, Walter de Watton. Hugo le Lister de Retford and Peter de Ordeshall, Thos. de Bougton and Robert de Scarle, Matthew de Warewell and Rob de Shurstot, John de Grantham, bailiff of the town of Notingham, John de Bray, Wm. Gustos of the church of Briminton, John de Harington, Ad Carbonel, Robert Dethic, pledges, Walter de Goushill and Robert de Sallowe, Will Ponger, Stephen de Breydestom, Wm. fil Adam de Winelesle, Henry le Blund de Neuton, John Brian de Notingham, Walter de Hucnal, John le Bare, Rad le Tanner, Wm. his brother, Wm. de Froddesham, Robert le Norrisisons, Walter Poppers, Wm. de Oxeye, Robert Scot de Nottingham (qy. Stot), Roger le Bere and Wm. fil Dye of the same, Wm. le Lyndraper, Reginald and John his sons, pledges, Andr atte Hasshe de Alwaston and Galf Franceis de Osmundeston, Rich fil Robert le Fleming, Hugo Bugge and John de Bilburg, Wm. Blabre, Robert de Screveton and Wm. Rose. Thos de Maclefeld ^30 for the marriage of Roger, son and heir of Galfry de Chedlei, Cecilia widow of Richard de Black- burn, late bailiff of Nottm., io8s. and 4.6. Henry Puterel de Notingham 20 m. for the Jews' houses. Henry de Rolleston, Heirs of Peter de Monteforte, Magr. Robert de Belfou. Robert de Sibetoft, Robert Bozon, lately bailiff of High Peak. Magister Robert de Bellovaris and Adam de Wetenhale. Henry de Cotgrave and Alice his wife (one of the daughters 256 THE PIPE ROLLS. and heirs of Alice, the widow of Walter de Botelsford, the first sister and heir of Richard de Wiverton, son and heir of Gervase de Wiverton, who held of the Honour of Peverel in capite i of I fee in Wiverton) paid 40s. for relief of half a 3rd part of a fifth of one knight's fee, Roger le Bret and Sarra his wife, the other heiress of the said Alice de Bottesford, John de Mendham (nepos) heir of Thomas Mellis (son of John de Mendham), (nepos) of Aline, 2nd sister and heir of Richard de Wiverton). Idonea, third sister of Richard de Wiverton, sold her share to Hugo de Stapelford of Nottingham and his heirs, whose heir was Alice, sister of the same Hugh and the wife of John le Paumer of Notingham. Gervase de Wiverton = PEDIGREE PROVED BY held 4 oJ^ a fee of the Honour of Peverel. SAME ROLL. I I I Richard de Idonia sold her Aline = Thomas Alice = Walter de Wiverton share to Hugh 1st d. I Mellis, 3rd s- s. p. de Stapelford. \ of Lane. 2nd sister and | Bottesford. co-heir. John= | | I Alice, ux Sarra, ux I Henry Roger le I Cotgrave. Bret. John de Mendham. Griffin ab Mereduck Walens imprisoned at the king's Castle of Nottingham, who took 3d. per day for his (keep ?) (vad) from St. Michael's day the 19th to St. Michael's the 21st day, two whole years, £g 2s., and for Robert (the man) of the said Griffin, for the same time, 32s., z.e., i6s. per annum. (This prince was a Peverel, a first cousin of the king.) Rad de Rochford (see in Warwick), Edmund de Stafford. Peter fil Peter, brother and heir of John Picot, who died Anno 22, paid his relief (he held Ratcliff-upon-Soar and Heydon in Essex), £^0. Matilde, eldest daughter and one of the heirs of Matilde, widow of Richard Picot, who died in the 23rd year of the king, also paid her relief for the land which the said Richard held of the king, it having been taken into the king's hands, according to the English law of inheritance. (These estates THE PIPE ROLLS. 257 were of the ancient demesne of the Crown, hence the common law did not apply.) Meroda, the other daughter and co-heir (posthumous), her relief. Thomas Picot held | fee by serjeantry of holding the basin (? bacina) at the king's coronation. Robert de Kesteven paid 20s. for the office of Monetor in the Wapentake of Wirksworth as in Roll 7, ;^22 for the past 21 years and for this. pipe IR0. 145, r. 15.-28 ]B5wai:& I. Ralf de Shirley sheriff for the first half-year ; Rich de FuRNEAUX for the last half. Robert Tibetot accounts for the lands and tenements, goods, and chattels of Lucie de Meynil, who was declared to be non compos mentis on the 19th day of Sept., in the 3rd year of the king, saving reasonable sustenance for the same Lucie. John Wake, fil and heir of Baldwyn Wake, owes ciiii. s. of the debts of the heirs of Wm. Briwere ; Pagan de Cadurcis, heir of Margaret de Feritate, the same ; John Mohun, heir of Alice Mohun, the same ; Johanna Percy the same. Mathew de Mortimer 32s. of the debts of William fil Reginald de Breuse by Grecia de Briwere, and John de Hastings, son of John, son of Eva, wife of Wm. de Cantelupe, another daughter of the said Wm. Breuse, Milicent de Montealto another daughter, Humphrey de Bolun, Earl of Essex, son of Eleanor another daughter. NEW OBLATIONS, Etc. Rann de Huntingfield. Isabella de Ros £20 for a charter of warranty, Wm., son and heir of Philip de Meynil, Walter de la Grau, Rich Daniel, Wm. de Schadwortb, John Folejambe, Galf le Fleming of the county Derby, John Maucorneys of Rutland, Magr John de Rempeston, Wm. de Herdeby, Adam Flemyng, Henry de Wodburg, Henry le Hunt, Margaret, widow of Roger Wandel, Will de Graham of the county Lincoln, Henry de Bradburn of the county Derby, Thomas Sayt. de Ashbourne, Thomas Daniel of the same, 34 258 THE PIPE ROLLS. Lambert de Trekington, Robert le Ragged, Henry de Tunstedes, Robert le Ragged de Staveley, Robert Balge the younger, Robert le Ragged de Castleton, Galf de Bradwell, Roger de Melner jun. de Tadington, Roger Cotterel, Thomas le Redman, Will le Ragged de Longley, Robert Brun, Robert de Boudon, Adam Cockeril, Henry cleric de Tadington, Robert de Clou, Will de Basselowe, Asser de Prestcliff, Rich de Berde, Elie de Thornhill, Nic de la Forth, Will de Clifif, Wm, Rankell de Hocklowe, Wm. le Slake bail for Clement de la Forth, farmer of the castle and Honour of Peak, who owed 437 m. and | for the year. Galf de Sandiacre ;^io for half the farm of the castle, etc., of Hareston. Thos de Macclesfield i^SOO for the farms of Ashford in Derby- shire, Macclesfield in Cheshire, and of Cuton in Flint in Wales. Thomas Foljambe accounted for ;^ioo fine for his lands in the 26th year, John Foljamb ;£'io for his fine. Odo de Grandisono £ioy 13s. 4d. for the rents of the Arch- bishop of York. Robert de Belvoir, the king's chamberlain, of Kaernarvon, owes £1,211 13s. 8d. received of the said Odo through Malcolm de Harle. Ingelram de Balliol of Foston his estates then in the king's hands. pipe IKlo. 146, r. 12—29 ]E5war5 I. Rich de Furneux sheriff for the first half-year ; Ralf DE Shirley for the second. Hugo Bigg, Walter fil Wm. de Ufton, Andrew de Nevil, Richard Laverok, Bailiff of Derby, Alex Norris de Claworth, Philip de Lenn de Chesterfield, Robert atte Wode de Whitewell, Jordan de Insula and Alice his wife, Henry de Witenton, Robert fil Walter le White de Colingham and Simon his brother, John fil Gilbert le Taylor de Derby, Thos de Penwich, Rad Coteril 20 m. for the marriage of Alice fil and heir Will de Kendale : sureties. Rich Daniel, Will de Gratton, and Wm. Coteril of the county of Derby, and John Macurneys of the county of Rutland ; Robert Dethec, John le Sauvage, Alured de Sulney, THE PIPE ROLLS. 259 Robert Abel and Margaret his wife, David fil Regiti de Pontes- bury, Henry fil Adam de Snelleston, Richard Cotun, Thos fil John de Liminenstre, German le Herder de Castro de Pec, Rich de Bingham x. m. for fine for license to assign his tenement to Andrew Cap for divine celebrations in the chapel of St. Elene of Bingham ; John Aincourt, Robert de Stuteville. pipe IRo. 147, r. 10.-30 ]E&war5 i. John de Grantham, bailiff of Nottingham. Malcolm de Harleg. Pagan, son and heir of Robert de Tibitot, who died anno. 27, paid his relief for the manor of Langar. Nic de Stutevill. Magister Richard de Havering. NEW OBLATIONS. Will le Taylor of Netherhaddon, Rad Pippard, John le Botiler, John de Basinges, Rich de Furneux, Rich de Eisford. Thomas de Normanville. John de Ekerinton, who married Johanna, one of the sisters and heirs of John fil Oliver de Luvetot, Ralf Morin who married Isabella, another sister and heir, and Alesie, another sister, paid relief for land of the Hon. of Tickhill. Robert, fil and heir Robert de Strelly, deceased, whom the king had in hand, paid lOOs. for his relief for lands in Strelly, Adbolton, and Cortingstork. Gocelin de Eyvill, Rad de Rhodes, Henry de Kniveton. pipe IR0. 148, r. 21.-31 ]£&wai:& I. R. DE SCHERL, sheriff. Philip de Paunton accounted for £s^ IQS- of the chattels of Rich le Franceis, Robert de Appleby felon for the death of Nicolas de Hastings, and Will de Hurtecla' aided and abetted the said felony. Hugo de Hargreave. 26o THE PIPE ROLLS. Will de Hotoft writ for unjust detention against W. de Bello- campo, Thos Maillard, Thos Morel, Nic Damyot, Ad de Ireton and Margaret his wife, Wm. fil Galfry Torcard, Rich de Arneburg, Wm. de Bredon, Robert de Bosco (see anno. 15), Nic Haylove, Thos de Bradeshaw, Robert de Rerisby (see year 6), Gervase de Clifton, Rad Coteril £iO for the marriage of John, brother and heir of Robert de Deri, Roger de Oylly parson of Boulton, Percy in Aynesty, Ingelram de Olecotes, Robert de Waddesley, Robert de Stradley, Walt de Thornton, Wm. Chasteleyn and Rich Lambok. Thomas Hasard, son and heir of William Hasard, his relief (see No. 27). Nic, son and heir of Margaret le Tailloure, his relief John, son and heir of John de Heriz, his relief. Eustace, fil and heir Robert de Morteyn, his relief Robert, son and heir Will le Eyr, relief (see Roll 28). Ad de St. Paul of Tideswell, Walter de Ludham and Isabella his wife, Thos de Cadurcis, John Prat de Retford. Roger le Bret owes £6 13s. 2d. of the debt of Walter de Grey. (See in Lincoln.) Is, widow of Hugh Burnel, rents in Aldemoneston. (See also in Salop.) pipe IR0. 149, r. 16—32 Ebwart) i. Peter Picot, sheriff Hugo, son and heir of John de Nevil, in custody, iJi 86 i6s. ild. arrears of the farm of Arnal. Richard de Kirby de Barton ;^45 of the farm of the manors of Barton and Bradmer, which were Stout de Stuteville's, an alien, and under the power (de potestate) of the King of France, and which, upon the occasion of the war between the king and the King ol France, were taken into the king's hands. Wm. le Hamilton and other executors of the will of Robert Burnel, owe ;^II0 of the farm of Arnal. The executors of the will of John de Grey account for the goods of Robt fil Thos de Screveton. Gerard de Fancourt £i\ 19s., John, son and heir of Roger le Savage, who died 29th of the king, paid his relief for the manor THE PIPE ROLLS. 26 1 of Steynsby ; Roger de Ryddeware and Henry le Bercher de Boylston, Richard fil Nigel de Wynefield and Robert his brother, Adam Albyn and Robert Bate of Chesterfield, Wm. Francis de Tibshelf, John de Gretton, Alan de Bosco, Ralf de Bosco de Doubridge Roger le Esquire, William fil Bate de Hocklow, Ricus Middleton, Jordan de Sutton, son and heir of Gerard de Sutton, for his relief NEW OBLATIONS. Gilbert de Flixthorpe, Will de Cashal, Rich fil Simon Beking- ham, John de Charewell, John de Graunt, John fil Henry de la Gruff. Constance de Byerne ;^I420 arrears of the farm of Whetel Roger fil Hugo le Bret. pipe IFlo. 150, r. 16 an& 15—33 EDwarb I. Thomas de Macclesfield ccc. £ for the farm of Allesford, Maclesford, and Cuton. John fil Hugh le Brett. Richard Willoughby 5 m. for license to assign certain rents to St. Peter's, at Nottingham. Walter de Goushill, Wm. de Bevcotes, Rad de Trehampton, John Deincourt, Rad de Bosco, Henry fil Richard de Mapelton. Alesca, widow of John Longvilliers ^it for license to marry. Ralf fil Serlo de Ridware, Thos fil Rad of the same, Roger de Ridware, Robert del Bothe, Thorn fil Hugh de Bunting, Alexander de Bosco, Wm. de Gamelesby, Walter de Anesley, Wm. le Archer de Offerton. NEW OBLATIONS. John de la Creasore and Sibella his wife, Hugh de Morsnap de Stretton, Nic Musard, Wm. le Parker de Lullington. ESCHEATS ULTRA TRENT. £14 17s. yd. of the rents of the lands of John de Heriz in Gonolveston in the county of Nottingham, and Tibshelf in the county of Derby, and in South Winfield, which he held of 262 THE PIPE ROLLS. - Laurence de Pavelli, i6 May, 27th year of the king, the day he died ; John, son and heir of the said John, 26s. 6d. rents of Nic de Aldetheleu in Tissington from the 9 Sepr, 27th year. Robert Morteyn 9s. 8d., from the 16 May, 27 Edward I., of the Hon. of Tickhill ; Eustace, the son and heir of the said Robert, 6d. of Wm. Ball of Sandiacre ; Peter, his heir, i bovate of land in Hop, which William le Heyr holds in capite by the service of the custody of the forest of Peak from the 30th day of November ; Robert, his son and heir, and of 46s. 2d. rent of the lands of Nicolas Musard of Staveley, who died the 21 Deer, 29th of the king ; Ralf de Freshville, nephew and one of the heirs ; Margaret, a sister and another heir ; and William de Chelardiston, and Johanna his wife, nephew and third heir of Nicolas. pipe mo. 151, r. 5.-34 ]£Dwar& I. Robert de Strelly, Robert de la Ward and John de Crumbwell. Walter Touke and Henry his son, Wm. fil Alan de Hayton. Rich, son and heir of Richard le Archer, paid his relief Adam, son and heir of Adam de Goumfrey, do. Hugh de Rodes, brother and heir of Henry, do. Roger, son and heir of Thomas de Lathom, do. Roger, son and heir of Roger de Wodrove. Philip de Strelly and Nicola his wife. (See in Salop.) NEW OBLATIONS, Etc. John fil Robert de Marcham. John fil Gilbert le Tailleur, bailiff of Derby. Robert le Befear, bailiff of Nottingham. Henry le Maty, Alan de Wormenhill, Rico Daniel and Johanna his wife, Rich fil Galfry de Dunham, Galf de Gresley Miles, Thos de Latimer and Lora his wife, Galf de Sandiacre, Nic de Birchwood, Will le Botiler de Crophill, Henry de Kirketon, Simon de Langelont, Henry fil William de Walesby, Robert fil John de Wykesop and Will Waleswod, Wm. de Skeggeby, Rich de Bateley, Robert de Eccleshale, Hugo le Bel, THE PIPE ROLLS. 263 Stephen de Hovedon, Will de Wiggely, Henry de Kniveton and Johanna his wife. Robert Ingram 20s. : pledges, John Ingram and John Tell. Robert de Pierpoint. John de Chandos ;^20 for the farm of the castle and soke of the Honour of Harston, to hold at the king's pleasure, saving escheats, etc. Heirs of Peter de Montfort, Roger de Shilton clicus. Thomas de Chaworth. The end of the Pipe Rolls for the Reign of King Edward I. — A.D. 1307. The whole of these Rolls will be carefully indexed, when an attempt will be made not only to give an alphabetical list, but to arrange them according to date and to family locaUty, so that their full value as a chronological system will be shown. This portion of the work is, however, post- poned until the extracts from the " Red Book " and other undated Rolls are printed, so that the reader may see at a glance the great value of the entry without having to refer to other Indices. 0EMROSE AND SONS, PRINTERS, DERBY; AND 23, OLD BAILEY, LONDON. lebrrateb (fag p^mtssbn) to Sir (gbtoartr 'gmxv ^tmkv, €ml of §trb3|, |a.^., f.C. Published by Bemrose & Sons, 23, Old Bailey, London, and Derby • Parker & Co., London and Oxford; and by Wilfred Edmunds, "Derbyshire Times" Office, Chesterfield. THE FEUDAL HISTORY OF THE CountiP of 2)erb^: {Chiefly dtiring the nth, 12th, and 13th Centm-ies), BY JOHN PYM YEATMAN, ESQ. (Of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law, formerly of Emanuel Culleee » Cambridge, and F.R.H.S., &c.) Author of "The Early Genealogical History of the House of Arundel ; " "The History of the Common Law of Great Britain and Gaul ; " " An Introduction to the Study of Early English History;" "The Mayor's Court Act, 1857-" "An Introduction to the History of the House of Glanville ; " "A Treatise on 'the Law of Trades Marks;" "The Origin of the Nations of Western Europe;" "The Records of Chesterfield ;" "A Treatise on the Law of Ancient Demesne';" "An Exposure of The Mismanagement of the Public Record Office," &c.,'&c. The Author has the gratification to announce that he will have the assistance of Sir George R. Sitwell, Bart., M.P., F.S.A., who has made extensive collections for the Counties of Leicester, South Yorkshire, and Derbyshire, in editing the Hundred of Scarsdale. Mr. Cecil J. S. Foljambe, M.P., F.S.A., will assist in editing the Hundred of High Peak ; and other Gentlemen of high Literary repute will assist the Author in compiling other portions of the Work. Price for the whole vork TEN GUINEAS, if paid in advance; Large Paper Copies, Tivo Guineas extra. To be published in sections of about 250 pages, Royal Octavo, each price Haifa-Guinea, or on Large Paper, 2s. 6d. extra. Two sections will form a Volume ; each Volume, which can be purchased separately, will be complete in itself, with full indices, the whole work to be com- plete (if possible) in Twenty Sections ; the subscription price will not be increased whatever the extent of the work. " Nothing can well be of greater interest to the student than the genealogical connection of this kingdom with that of our continental neighbours and the old Duchies of Normandy and Brittany. Absolutely little of consequence was known (and this (ar from accurately) until the publication by the late distinguished Herald, Mr. Planche, of his 'William the Conqueror and his Companions.' Sir Francis Palgrave in his Work was barred from going into all those details of history so neces- sary to a just appreciation of the connection of the ruling houses of England and Normandy, but his eloquent sketches of the Duchy will never fade from the memory iif the cultivated so long as history holds its domain in the human mind. Other gentlemen of repute have since written upon this subject more or less fully ; but it st-ems to have remained for the present learned Author to unearth from the various archives of the French Republic, and from the great stores of materials in the Pipe Rolls and the Red Book of the Exchequer, and those in the possession of the Duke of Rutland and Lord Arundel of Wardour (extending in date from the reigns of the Dukes of Normandy and regularly down to the time of Henry III. of England), a large amount of original information, which, although of so fragmentary a character in many cases as to necessitate the utmost industry, skill and circumspection in using, has enabled Mr. Yeatman to give to the reader something approaching a sound and reliable Work on this interesting period of Anglo-Norman history." SECOND NOTICE. " To handle all the multitude of facts in this book (far exceeding in number, and often in abstruse significance any disclosed in the greatest cause celibri), and to deal with them in a comprehensive manner, giving full effect to the numerous subtleties of meaning they often disclose, requires a grasp of intellect which can never be too fully ^ appreciated. It is not surprising then if some should slip out of hand, and it would ill become the critic to score his page with black marks where there is abundance of merit so conspicuous to compensate for almost any degree of shortcoming, especially in a costly first edition which cannot easily very soon be supplanted by a second. "In conclusion, the least that can be said of 'The History of the House of Arundel ' is, that it is an admirable collection of facts ; and, if for this reason only, is very valuable, but its facts are skilfully arranged, and the learned Author has placed them in the most candid manner in every conceivable light before the reader, however laboured his efforts may occasionally appear; and after the judg- ment and research displayed in this work, if he has failed to command, he has certainly deserved success. As a volume for the earnest student of both direct and circumstantial evidence, it is to be warmly commended ; and the many tabular pedigrees will repay the perusal of every one interested in the stream of history which connects so many of the past and present races with those of our own. We cordially congratulate Mr. Yeatman on the production of this admirable book." Prom the " Bristol and Gloucester Archaeolog-ical Journal," Vol. VII., Part I., a criticism by Sir John MacLean of Bicknor Court : " The chapter on the settlement of the house of St. Sauveur, in the West of England, will be found of special interest to our readers, inasmuch as it gives the origin of many ancient families in the western counties, but the space at our disposal will not admit of our entering into details. " To compile an authentic pedigree of one ancient family is no light task, but to grapple with those of many of the Norman nobility and trace their descendants respectively from original authorities is a work of Herculean labour, and Mr. Yeatman's Book, when completed, will form a monument of industry and patient research. He seems to be well acquainted with the several personages who come within his range, and, throughout all their shifting scenes, maintains, upon the whole, a firm grasp of their individuality. That there are many, and possibly mipoi tant, mislakes in such a work would be unavoidable, and some of the state- inents made seems to us not to be vouched for by sufficient evidence ; nevertheless allowing for all these errors and shortcomings, the Work will prove a most useful contribution to English history and genealogy." THE ORIGIN OF THE NATIONS OF WESTERN EUROPE. Price 6s. Burns and Gates, London. " Every one must own the clearness ot style, the cogency of argument, the wealth of illustration in the way of learning, the depth of thought, and the perfect indepen- th Sept., 1879. A TREATISE ON THE LAW OF ANCIENT DEMESNE. Written in Illustration of the Records of Chesterfield. Price 3s. 6d. Wilfred Edmunds, Chesterfield. From Dr. Charles Cox's criticism of the " Records of Chester- field (Journal of the Derbyshire Archaeological Society, 1885.") " Tbe work of transcribing, translating and editing these archives was entrusted to the capable pen of Mr. Pym Yeatman, and most ably has he done his task. The introduction is helpful and original, its only fault being its brevity." " The work has been most ably done by Mr. Yeatman, than whom no one could have been found more competent for the task, and he has preceded the body of the work by a masterly, pble and valuable historical preface, which adds immensely to its value." — The Reliquary, April, 1885.— By the Editor. " This little book deals with a subject that is very interesting just now, and the records quoted by the Author, from documents relating to the Borough Courts of Chesterfield, are exceedingly curious. Mr. Yeatman gives some curious facts from Manor records and elsewhere, and his essay appears to us to contain some important facts which are well worth close attention from those whose special study it is to reconsider the history of land-holding m'EngXa.nd."— The Antiquary, December, 1884. Some Extracts from the Press relating to AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF EARLY ENGLISH HISTORY, &-c. The Metropohtan, 14th August, 1874. "Old-fashioned people who believe iu ' Mangnall's Questions,' ' Pinnock's Catechism of English History,' or in Hume and Smo ett, will "^^^d 'his work with fear and tremblini. We are not prepared to endorse all the views set forth m these pages but the book is .so immeasurably above the ordinary run of histories which are mere repetitions of facts previously invented and judiciously airanged, that we must cordially advise every reader to study it intently. Evening Standard, 12th November, 1874. " This is a most original Work, overflowing with learning, and marked through- out with a complete mastery over the most minute details of this extensive subject. By far the most interesting portion of the Woik is the patient research shewn by the Author into the origin of the English language, and his dissertation on our Saxon literature, laws, and customs. Some of the most dangerous errors of Drs. Marsh and Latham are freely exposed, and with success ; with like freedom and success the hi- torical errors of Mr. Freeman, Lord Macaulay, and Sir Edward Creasey, are brought home to their several authors." The Press, Philadelphia, 20th November,' 1874. " The present volume is a remarkable example of original thought, historical research, philosophical deduction, and bold disregard of the merely traditional views of previous writers, who, taking too much for granted, have been content to travel in beaten tracks merely because they are old. To a large extent the Author ignores the claims of the Saxons as founders of either the language or the laws of England, and doubts whether, indeed, they had a distinct nationality. The Work is earnest and able." The Law Review (Ens'lish), Vol. III., N. S., p. 1139 (1874)- " Mr. Yeatman writes with all the spirit of a true antiquary. He has an ardent appreciation of his subject, and pursues it with a keenness and a zest known only to those who have for some time indulged in antiquarian research. His work turns up much fertile soil, and though we do not concur in his main views, yet we willingly recognise the general value of his treatise. Its main object seems to be to unearth those jural elements that lie deep at the base of our laws, and to assign them, if possible, to a British rather than a Saxon origin. In this view he is undoubtedly nearer the truth than those writers — and they are legion, including the great Blackstone himself — who asciibe a Saxon origin to our Common Law. " His description of the influence of Roman jurisprudence on modern law indicates much literary grace and skill. It is clear that Mr. Yeatman is a rheto- rician, and a poet of no mean order. If ever he divests his thoughts from the Common Law, a boundless and more fertile field will lie before him in the domain of general literature. He certainly has all the qualities that constitute a vigorous writer. Tliere is not anything improbable in most of Mr. Yeatman's views. His work indicates great facility of composition, and an intimate familiarity with all the leading arcana of Celtic lore." The Am.erican Law Review, Vol. IX. (1874-75), P- 123- " Mr. John Pym Yeatman possesses at least two qualities in common with the distinguished Englishmen whose name he bears — independence and courage ; without the former he could not have written, without the latter he would hardly have published, the extraordinary book which form.s the subject of this notice. Mr. Yeatman has produced a remarkable book." The Freeman's Journal (Dublin). "Under this unpretending title Mr. Yeatman has given to the world a veiy valuable book. His introduciion is not, as such works usually are, a mere transcript, more or less abridged, of the standard and approved authors on the subject. It is as remarkable for the boldness and originality of its views as it is for patient research and easy vigour of style. The author sets out with the theory that falsehood and exaggera- tion have mingled so largely with the writings of English historians, more especially since the Reformation, that it has become almost impossible to recognise the truth in its twisted, distorted form. He contends that it is not in the history of the Saxons, but in the ignored history of the Celtic race, that England has to look for the origin of all that she possesses that is valuable or noble — her language, her literature, her Common Law, and her Constitution. In the coiu-se of his very able work he boldly exposes the innumerable misrepresentations with which English history is underlaid, and advances many strong and ingenious arguments in support of the theory he has adopted. The book is characterised throughout by a patient, industrious, laborious, and patient research, and an honest desire to discover and declare the truth at ail hazards and under all circumstances."