1 '3 a state College of agriculture &t Cornell UmbersJitp Jt&aca, iJ. p. Etfcrarp t p REPORT OF THE Special Committee of the Assembly APPOINTED TO INVESTIGATE TUBERCULOSIS AND OTHER DISEASES OF ANIMALS. TRANSMITTED TO THE LEGISLATURE FEBRUARY 1, 1900. if ALBANY: JAMBS B. LYON, STATE PRINTER. ! %j ' ' 1900. Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924003482803 REPORT OF THE Special Comiiiittee of the Assembly, APPOINTED TO INVESTIGATE TUBERCULOSIS AND OTHER DISEASES OP ANIMALS. TRANSMITTED TO THE LEGISLATURE FEBRUARY 1, 1900. ALBANY: JAMES B. LYON, STATE PRINTER. 1900. A/7 3 CS. UlH 5" -5" State of New York. No. 43. IN ASSEMBLY, Febbuakx 1, 190(h REPORT ASSEMBLY SPECIAL INVESTIGATING COMMITTEE ON TUBEECULOSIS AND OTHEE DISEASES OF ANIMALS. Hon. S. F. Nixon, Speaker of the Assembly: Sir:— The Assembly for the year 1899, adopted the following resolution : Eesolved, That the Speaker of the Assembly is hereby author- ized to appoint three members of the Assembly as a committee to investigate the operation of the present laws in relation to the disease of tuberculosis and other contagious diseases in ani- mals, and infections in animal products, and to ascertain the best means for the prevention of the spread of such disease,. and to report on or before the 1st day of February, 1900, the result of their investigations and recommend such legislation as is needed for the suppression of such diseases. Such committee shall have the power to prosecute its inquiries in every direction necessary to arrive at a full and accurate knowledge of the subject under investigation. The expenses of such investigation shall not exceed the sum of $2,500, which 4 [Assembly shall be paid out of the appropriation for contingent expenses of the Legislature. Pursuant to this resolution the undersigned were appointed the committee required by its terms. The committee has exam- ined more than 60 witnesses during the investigation, about one- half of which were experts, the remainder leading farmers. We have had hearings at Albany, Syracuse, Owego, Buffalo and Batavia in this State. We have twice inspected the Buffalo stock yards. At Owego we had before us Dr. Leonard Pearson of Philadel- phia, B. S., and V. M. B., State Veterinarian of Pennsylvania and Dean of the Department of Veterinary Medicine of the Univer- sity of Pennsylvania. He gave us the law, methods and expenses of . Pennsylvania employed to eradicate bovine tuberculosis. The committee also visited New Brunswick, N. J., and. had before them Hon. Franklin Dye, Secretary of both the State Board of Agriculture and the State Tuberculosis Commission, and Dr. Julius Nelson, Professor of Biology at Rutgers and Biologist of the State Agricultural College Experiment Station. The committee also visited Boston, Mass., and took the evi- dence of Dr. Theobald Smith, Professor of Comparative Pathol- ogy in Harvard Medical School and Pathologist of the State Board of Health, Dr. Austin Peters, chairman of the Massa- chusetts Board of Cattle Commissioners, and several other mem- bers of the State Board. Thus we have the laws, methods, ex- penses and results of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Massachusetts and New York. Very much of the evidence from noted experts has never been in print, and We feel that we have in our possession at present much of the latest scientific thought on this question. No. 43.] 5 The committee is under special obligations to the witnesses who are not residents of this State for their assistance in fur- nishing the committee much valuable evidence. It is also worthy of note that of the large number of witnesses subpoenaed in New York, all responded to summons except one, who furnished a subordinate in his office to give evidence. The committee is also under obligations to their Secretary E. A. Callahan of the " Country Gentlemen " for valuable aid in collecting evidence. In addition to the large amount of evidence taken by the com- mittee, we have in our possession the laws governing bovine tuberculosis either in full or in synopsis, now in force in Ger- many, France, Belgium, Denmark, Switzerland, Norway, Canada, Australia, United States and 16 of the United States, together with a large number of reports, bulletins, etc., from these States. We also have in our possession the report of the " Koyal Com- mission of England " of 1898. This commission took evidence for two years in England, Wales, Belgium, Germany and Den- mark. The resolution authorized the committee to investigate not only bovine tuberculosis, but all contagious and infectious ani- mal diseases, and infections in animal products, but the time and funds at our command were insufficient to go farther than the investigation of two or three of those contagious diseases from which the farmers of this State are sustaining the greatest loss. The three principal diseases investigated were, bovine tuberculosis, abortion in cows and sheep scab. Under the present law the owner of cattle slaughtered by the State receives one-half the appraised value of the animal, if dis- eased, and full' value if found to be sound upon post-mortem examination. The same veterinarian makes the examination be- 6 [Assembly fore and after slaughter. It has been claimed by many farmers that in his desire to make both examinations agree, many sound animals have been pronounced tuberculosis, and the owner has thereby been defrauded out of one-half of the value of such ani- mals. The committee determined to witness the slaughter of at least one herd for the purpose of knowing the truth of these charges, and was present at the slaughter of 21 cows at Syracuse, early in July. As a herd they were badly diseased. Two from the herd died with tuberculosis during the previous winter, and about one-third of the herd had failed to breed for two years. They have been kept in a stable well adapted to spread and hasten the disease. Before the slaughter the committee had been pro- vided" with glass jars, the number of each cow slaughtered was pasted on the side of the jar. The services of Dr. James Law of Cornell University had been procured by the committee, and as the diseased part of each cow was found by the veterinarian in charge for the State, it was placed on a table. After exami- nation by Dr. Law it was placed in a jar, sealed and turned over to Dr. William H. May, City Bacteriologist to be put in cultures and examined under a microscope. Where slight disease was found all of the diseased part was put in a jar. Later the veteri- narian acting for the State testified that all of the cattle slaugh- tered had tuberculosis. Dr. May testified as follows : Q. Doctor, the investigating committee of the Assembly left with you sample of affected parts of the Brown herd, slaugh- tered by the State here a few weeks ago? A. They did. Q. You have examined those specimens? A. I have examined six of them fully, and the whole 21 in part. ' Q. What did you find, doctor, in the diseased parts? A. Of the six selected specimens do you mean, or all of them — I found No. 43.] 7 on examining that of the 21, I found 20 of them were fit for examination; that is to say they were in such condition that they could be examined. One of them, I think the /lumber was 105, that was dried up, and shrunk and not in a fit state for a micro- scopical or any other examination, it was so small, and you might say, gone to pieces; dried and shrunken and not fit to be examined, couldn't do anything with it; that was the number that I had — the remaining 20 I found tubercle bacilli in 19 out of the 20— *he odd one, the twentieth one was 109, a piece of intestine — I did not find any evidence of disease in that at all. Q. Your examination was sufficiently thorough so you should be able to determine? A. It was; yes. Q. As to the whole 21? A. Yes. Upon the evidence given by the veterinarian the owner of these cattle would receive one-half the appraised value for all of them; but upon the evidence of Dr. May, the owner should receive full value for one or possibly two of the number. Specimens from six different cows taken from different parts were chemically treated by Dr. May and placed in glasses to be used by the stereoscopist in educational work. The illustration as thrown upon the canvass is the diseased part itself, and is made to last many years. These slides are the property of the State, and are now in the hands of F. E. Dawley, Director of Farmers' In- stitutes. « While in New Jersey the committee saw a herd of cows that were condemned six years ago under the tuberculin test. They were owned by the State at the Experimental Station. They were put in barns built for that purpose, and have since been kept in strict quarantine. There had been in all 14 different cows in this barn, but only four remained at the time of our visit. 8 [Assembly They nave been kept for experimental purposes and occasionally one has been slaughtered. The experiment has been under the supervision of Dr. Julius'Nelson. He said that some of the cows had received the tuberculin test 17 times. He has been trying to determine among other thing the effect of tuberculin. Some times the test had been applied several times in a few weeks; at other times the test had not been applied for nearly two years. Evidence derived, from these experiments will often be referred to in this report. Tuberculosis has caused the death of man and animal for cen- turies, and so much has been written upon the subject that it is needless for the committee to report on symptoms, and many other phases of this disease. Not until recent years has so much attention been paid to this disease in cattle. When the farmer found one of his eows drooping, she was either slaughtered or allowed to die, and nothing more was thought of it. After the discovery of the tubercle bacilli as the cause of the disease, the discovery was claimed to be made by some that the bacilli in man and animal were identical, and the death of infants, especially when brought up upon cow's milk, and occasion- ally the conditions connected with the death from consumption of an adult, lead physicians to believe that the disease could be communicated from animal to man. For this reason several States, have made appropriations for investigations and passed laws for the purpose of endeavoring to exterminate bovine tuber- culosis. This State was among the first to take such action, and since 1892 the work has been under State control. v THE LAW IN THIS AND OTHER STATES. The State Board of Health of New York consists of nine mem- bers, required to meet at Albany at least four times a year, and No. 43.] 9 to serve without pay. Under the present law, they select two of their number as a " Tuberculosis Committee." This com- mittee has charge of the work of exterminating tuberculosis in cattle and glanders in horses in this State. The care of all other animal diseases is placed with the Department of Agriculture. Each member of the committee receives a salary of $3,000 a year and necessary expenses. And each carry on a private practice. In addition to their salaries, the State pays a stenographer and the veterinarians who make all examinations for the committee. After cattle had been condemned, the committee require an agreement or contract to be signed by the owner of the animals, which he was not previously aware of. A good many farmers feel that this agreement as required by the tuberculosis com- mittee interferes with their rights and claim against the State, and therefore in some instances they refuse to sign it. The com- mittee thereupon refuse to notify the Comptroller that such cattle have been condemned. By reason of this an appraiser is not appointed, and some herds have been held in quarantine for long periods. Since the law controlling this work was first en- acted, the farmer has had difficulty in obtaining indemnity from i the State, and in many instances he has preferred to surrender his claim against the State rather than to follow through the long tedious process necessary to secure it. At one time he was compelled to send his claim to the Court of Claims, which re- quired the attendance of an attorney, and unless his claim was considerable, the fees would be equal to the amount received. Lately the appropriation for the committee has been small, and they have used practically all of it for their own salaries and expenses, and the farmer if he receives his indemnity gets it by the same being incorporated in the Supplemental Supply bill. 10 , [Assembly Last year all indemnities paid were obtained in this manner, and the total amount paid by the State was only '$2,415. The State pays one-half the appraised value for all animals found to be diseased on post-mortem examination; and full appraised value for all animals .found to be sound upon similar examination. The maximum appraisal is $60 for thoroughbred animals and $40 for all others. TUBEECULOSIS COMMITTEE AND DEPAETMENT OP AGEICULTUBE. The work of the Tuberculosis Committee and Department of Agriculture often come in conflict with each other. This joint jurisdiction is expensive and is a serious menace to- the interests of the dairymen. On this subject the Governor in his last annual message, under the head of the Department of Agriculture, said: — " To some extent the work of this department is duplicated or clashes with that of the State Board of Health. The Assembly Committee appointed to consider the subject of tuberculosis in cattle will deal with this matter, at least in part, in their report to the Legislature." An illustration will be given. On January 27, 1899, a veterinarian acting for the committee examined about 90 heads of cattle for George Parsons of Berkshire, N. Y., and condemned, under the tuberculin test, 38. These animals were accordingly placed in quarantine by them. Soon after this date Dr. Smith, secretary of the committee, sent to Mr. Parsons the, following letter or agreement for his signature and return : — Dr. Frederick W. Smith, Secretary Tuberculosis Committee Syracuse, N. Y.: My Dear Doctor:— On. the 27th of January, Dr. acting under your direction, tested my herd of cattle for tuberculosis, and has given me notice that a number of them have that disease. No. 43.] 11 He has notified me that they must be maintained in strict quar- antine. I hereby ask that you have these cattle appraised and slaughtered as provided by the public health law, and if they are appraised and slaughtered I will not ask for the payment of the award due me out of the appropriation made your committee for the present fiscal year. ".Neither will I assign or transfer, my claim to others. I will not ask for or expect indemnity for the loss, of my cattle unless a new appropriation is granted by the present or some succeeding legislature." Mr. Parsons took counsel from several lawyers, and was in every instance advised not to sign this agreement. He person- ally felt that by doing so he would surrender some of his rights. On account of his refusal to sign the agreement, the secretary of the committee refused to notify the Comptroller that such a herd had been condemned, and there has not been an appraiser appointed up to this date. Soon after the cattle were condemned, - the Commissioner of Agriculture received official notice from the tuberculosis committee that such a herd had been condemned, and it was his duty under the law to forbid the sale of milk from - this herd. The legislature of 1899 refused to make an appro- priation for the salaries and expenses of the tuberculosis commit- tee pending this investigation. On April 29th, the day after the adjournment of the legislature, Dr. Smith wrote Mr. Parsons as follows : " Sybacuse, N. Y., April 2$, 1899. Me. Gboeqb Pabsons, BerkaMfe, N. T.: Dear Sir: — We have just been informed that the legislature which has just adjourned failed to make any appropriation for carrying out the provisions of the publie health law relating to bovine tuberculosis, or the payment of awards for eattle con- 12 [ASSBMBI/T demned. Because of this, I desire to inform you that the future disposition of your herd must depend upon the action and permis- sion granted you by the local Board of Health having jurisdic- tion. Yours very respectfully, F. W. SMITH, M. D., Secretary Tuberculosis Committee." Mr. Parsons thereupon asked for a meeting of the local Board of Health, but after consulting several members of the board, they decided that if the state had raised the quarantine upon the disposition of the herd, that they had no further jurisdiction in the matter, and so informed him. The condition of his herd, after this action was this — He was permitted to sell his con- demned cattle, but could not jaell the milk or products therefrom. Mr. Parsons then took steps to have the products from his dairy removed from quarantine. The Commissioner of Agriculture said that he had authority under the law to have the herd exam- ined and remove from quarantine the milk from any cows that failed to respond to the test. The herd was re-tested on June 30th, by two of the leading veterinarians of this state, one of them being the same man who made the first test. Thirty-three cows were examined at this time that had been previously con- demned in January. Of this number twenty-one responded to the test ; four were not in a fit condition for examination. The re- maining eight did not respond to the test and were removed from quarantine. Mr. Parsons has considered since that time that he had permission to sell any or all of the twenty-five animals origi- nally condemned, but has been unable to sell the milk or products from them. Another illustration follows: — In August, 1899, Dr. Thomas F. O'Dea of Saugerties, wrote Dr. F. W. Smith, Secretary No. 43.] , 13 l of the Tuberculosis Committee, Hon. Charles A. Wieting, Com- missioner of Agriculture, and Dr. Baxter Smelzer, Secretary of the State Board of Health, relative to the testing of some sheep with tuberculin. He first wrote Dr. Smith and was referred by him to Mr. Wieting, Mr. Wieting referred him tp Dr. Smelzer, i and by Dr. Smelzer he was told to consult Dr. Smith again. This well illustrates the confusion caused by the joint jurisdiction of these two departments. In all of the states visited by the com- mittee, bovine tuberculosis is under control of Agricultural boards. In Pennsylvania, the control of contagious diseases among do- mestic animals is carried on by a State Live Stock Sanitary Board. All animals admitted to the state are first submitted to the tuberculin test or are kept in strict quarantine after entering the state, until they are tested there. No herds are tested except on application of the owner, and then only where disease is suspected. All reacting animals are condemned and slaughtered. The limit of compensation i^o the owner is $25 for unregistered cattle and $50 for registered cattle. The average payments are about $24.50 for both classes. The appraisal is usually made by the inspector and always at the time of the examination; the cattle are slaughtered at that time, the place at once disinfected and the owner allowed to go on with his business. New Jersey has a commission of seven. The commission on application from an owner of cattle, the State Board of Health, or the State Dairy Commissioner, will make an examination of suspected herds. They are appraised at market value before examination, the owner receiving compensation at the rate of three-fourths of their valuation, not exceeding $40. Those found diseased are slaughtered at least within a day or two after being condemned. 14 [Assembly ( Massachusetts .was the first state to take up the. work. The laws of that state have passed through several evolutions. For some time they employed the tuberculin test and slaughtered all re-acting animals. Three years ago the state expended two hun- dred and forty thousand dollars to eradicate bovine tuberculosis, there being but two hundred and twelve thousand cattle in the state the appropriation was more than one dollar per head. A like per cent in this state would call for an appropriation in a single year of nearly three million dollars. Farmers rebelled against this slaughter to such an extent that the next legisla- ture did not make an appropriation for this work. An unsuc- cessf ul attempt was made to repeal the law. The next year a law was enacted under which the work is carried on at the present time. The state does not. condemn and slaughter animals except those than can be found by physical examination diseased. The maximum indemnity paid is $40 for each animal. The appraisal is made and animal slaughtered at or near the time they are con- demned. If held more than ten days in quarantine, the state pays the expenses attendant on such quarantine. If the owner desires the remainder of his herd examined with tuberculin^an agreement is entered into between the owner and the state^ be- fore examination is made, and the state assists him in his efforts to eradicate this disease from h;s herd. The state maintains a quarantine against the importation of all cattle, unless accom- panied by a bill of health. There is supposed to be a physical examination of all cattle and inspection of the stables in the state each year. Relative to the efficiency of this law, Dr. Samuel W. Abbott who has been secretary of the State Board of Health during the past nineteen years testified as follows: No. 43.] 15 " Q. Do you think public health is properly guarded by having tuberculosis, bovine tuberculosis, under the management of the Cattle Commission? " A. I should think so as far as that subject is concerned, cer- tainly — I think it is one of those questions of evolution. We have been going through a process of evolution in Massachusetts in regard to cattle inspectors and the whole subject. The present board seem to be taking hold of the subject in better shape than it has been for some time. I haven't looked over this law, and don't know all the points in it as well as I ought to know it. It seems to me they have settled down to a more satisfactory way of working, than it has been for some time." The bill recommended by the Royal Commission of England does not provide for government inspection of live animals. They recommend that all animals to be used as human food shall be slaughtered under inspection at the public slaughter houses. If slaughtered in other countries they must be examined by the pub- lic slaughter houses before being placed on the market. On the subject of the inspection of milk put on the market they say : "We recommend that notification of every disease in the udder shall be made compulsory under penalty, on the owner of all cows, whether in private dairies or those of which the milk is offered for sale. We also recommend that powers shall "be given to local authorities to take samples and make analyses from time to time of the milk produced or sold in their districts, and that milk ven- ders shall be required to supply sufficient information as to the sources from which their milk is derived." It will thus be seen that the government only has control of the meat and milk of animals when placed on the market. 16 [Assembly TRANSMISSIBILITY. It is generally believed that tuberculosis can be transmitted from animal to man and from man to animal. This has been so generally accepted that many seem to believe that a large major- ity of the people who die with consumption take the disease from cattle, either through milk or meat. In a paper read before the investigating committee by an eminent doctor and state official he said: " I have been requested to present to this conference a short paper reviewing somewhat the work of the New York State Board of Health, in protecting the life and health of the public from the danger of infection from tuberculosis, which is now recognized by all sanitarians to be derived largely from the use of food products from tuberculosis cattle." Such sweeping statements have led the consuming public to believe a great error. The evidence taken by the committee would indicate that very rarely, if ever, does a person contract tuber- culosis from the meat or milk of animals. The committee have perhaps spent more time on this one branch of the subject than any other. At the first hearing Dr. Edward Moore, of Albany, member of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, England, read an ex- haustive paper in which he held that the tubercle bacilli in man and animal were not identical, and that the disease is not trans- missible from animal to man, or from man to animal. If this could be proved, the question would at once resolve itself into a question of loss to the farmer only. On this point Dr. Moore says: " If we have succeeded in purging the bovine of responsibility for human tuberculosis, we have severed the relation supposed to exist and which gave origin to. the title of this paper. People No. 43.] 17 everywhere will feel relieved. Cattle owners will vie with the cow milk. drinkers, and the beef eaters in their appreciation of the fact that their minds are now freed from the terrible menace that has heretofore haunted them. The cattle industry will re- ceive new impetus. Physicians will have to educate consump- tives to appreciate the necessary precaution they should take, nay, must take, for the protection of their fellow being, and healthy people must be made to understand in what ways tuber- ous subjects are dangerous to them. The imperative need is for measures of protection of human from human. Such educa- tion will cut down the death rate more rapidly than medical treatment. The establishment of hospitals and retreats for the treatment and isolation of consumptives js the best step physi- cians have yet taken for the prevention of the spread of this dis- ease. We are now raising one foot to step up on to the firmer ground of the 20th century, where no erring footsteps have yet been taken. In the few days left us ere we reach that new tryst- ing place, let us bend our energies to the great task leaving for- ever behind us old prejudices, theories we were taught to accept, but which have not proved trusty; deductions arrived at from experiments well intended, but which are nullified by better evidence now before' us. Let us not look at things as they have been pictured, but strive to see them exactly as they are. If we have failed to convince you, we have at least, pointed the way for future investigation and given the earnest of the verdict that is to follow whether you render it to-day or to-morrow." Of the large number of experts examined who believed the dis- ease was so transmissible, only a few have been able to cite defi- nite cases; and in most of the cases cited, there were only local lesions resulting from the bacilli, and that by inoculation. 2 18 [Assembly Theobald Smith, M.'D., of Harvard University, has been mak- ing experiments for several years on the identity of the bacilli in man and animal. As an authority on this subject, he is of the highest standing. He says : •—■'tj. Will you please state what you found in relation to bovine tuberculosis, as being communicated to man? A. I have found in the study of cultures of tubercle bacilli — those isolated human sputum in case of tuberculosis and those from tuberculous tissues of cattle, that there are certain differ- ences which could be quite easily recognized by various laboratory methods. This study of comparing tubercle bacilli from man and domestic animals is still going on, and at present the position which I took several years ago that certain differences between bovine and human bacilli do exist has not been changed." Q. Have you found tubercle bacilli in man and bovine identical in any instance? A. Not thus far. Q. Do you consider bovine tuberculosis a great menace to pub- lic health? A. I do not consider it a great menace unless the inferences deducible from my studies are wrong. I think that we must ac- cept the evidence brought forward, that cases of human tubercu- losis do sometimes originate from cattle, until our information concerning the permanency or changeability of the characters of tubercle bacilli is on a firmer basis. Q. Do you think from experience or reports of human con- sumption, that such a case is probable where the identity of the bacilli could be lost? A. It is probable. It seems to me that a passage of tubercle bacilli is possible from animal to man, but we are quite in the tfoi 43.] 19 dark how often it takes place, and what are the particular cir- cumstances that may favor or prevent the infection from taking place. Q. If I understand you correctly you consider that these ques- tions are still unsettled? A. I do. But on general principles, I believe that the danger has been over-estimated. Dr. James Law, Director of the State Veterinary College at Ithaca, N. Y., is among the number that may be considered high authority; he believes that the disease can be transmitted from animal to man in some instances. The committee found in the state institutions where for many years, the milk furnished the inmates has been from tuberculous •cows, that in every instance the percentage of deaths from con- sumption has been gradually decreasing. In at least one such in- stitution having about one thousand three hundred inmates, the ■cows furnishing milk for such institution have been occasionally dying from this disease for ten or twelve years. All milk pro- duced from these cows was consumed by inmates as milk, yet the report shows the same decrease here as in other institutions. In the state of Massachusetts the records have been well kept for half a century. In 1855, forty-two persons out of every ten thousand population died with consumption; in 1898, only nine- teen in every ten thousand. This decrease has been steadyand gradual. Dr. Austin Peters, president of the Board of Cattle Commis- sioners, testified that about twenty per cent of the cows of that state showed tuberculosis by tuberculin test, which was less thair formerly. Considering the large number of people and the num- ber of years covered by this record, it seems to prove that the 20 [Assemble number of persons who die from consumption contracted from the meat or milk of animals, in that state, where one-fifth of the cattle are diseased, is very small. According to the report of the State Board of Health about thirteen thousand people die of consumption in New York every year. This number remains about the same, which gradually re- duces the per cent, to the extent of the increase of population. It must be admitted that as these people visit every public place known, that thirteen thousand consumptives give off enough bacilli to infect every person in the state during the year with- out the aid of a single bovine. In the report of the Royal Commission they find that the per- centage of death from human consumption has been steadily fall- ing during the past fifty years. The percentage of decrease be- ing 39.1 during that time. The following from their report will show the percentage of tuberculous meat passed in Saxony as fit for human food : " We bear in view the remarkable returns of the results of rigid but discriminating inspection in 29 towns in Saxony during the year 1895. Meat inspectors at the public abattoirs in these towns are all qualified veterinary surgeons. Tuberculosis was found to exist in 22,758 carcasses — being 27.48 per cent, of the whole number slaughtered. The whole of these according to the practice of some authorities in this country would have been confiscated and destroyed without compensation. But in Saxony they were dealt with as follows: Of the total number 22,758 carcasses showing tuberculous lesions, 21,062 or 92£ per cent, were passed as fit for food; 1,256 carcasses or about 5£ per cent. were disposed of in the Friebank as inferior meat, at a fixed cheap rate; and the remainder 440 carcasses or 2 per cent, of the No. 43.] 21 whole number, pronounced tuberculous, in a greater or less de- gree were condemned as unfit for food and destroyed." The consuming public have been lead to believe that a large portion of the milk- consumed, contains the tubercle bacilli. The evidence taken by the committee would go to show that this rarely occurs. Dr. V. A. Moore, M. D., V. S.,. Professor of Com- parative Pathology and Bacteriology N. Y. State Veterinary Col- lege, Cornell University, New York, testified on this point as fol- lows: Q. How many times did you find the tubercule bacilli? A. I never found it — oh, a very few times— and I could not be positive as to the number, but in microscopic investigations, I found it in three or four. animals, but they were advanced cases of tuberculosis. Q. Those were the only ones that you have found the tubercle bacilli in, to absolutely exist, that is, to your satisfaction? , A. To my satisfaction, the only ones in which I have come to know it to be present by personal work. Q. What conditions were the animals in you got the milk from? A. Well, they were poor; that is, they were such animals that an ordinary practitioner would diagnose as diseased, if not tuber- 'V # ■ colons, without any difficulty, without the tuberculin. Dr. William H. May, Bacteriologist for the Board of Health of the city of Syracuse, and also lecturer and demonstrator of path- ology and bacteriology in the College of Medicine of Syracuse University, also testified as below : Q. What I wanted to bring out was, whether the animal in the stages spoken of, whether there would be any connection with the circulation, and so of the milk to convey the disease? A. Well, of course, so far as we know about that to-day, an animal may have tuberculosis and may have it in a very advanced 22 [Assembly stage, and yet give perfectly healthful milk; but if the udder glands are infected ever so slightly, tubercle bacilli have been found in the milk. Q. Have you ever discovered this in your own work, in the milk?' A. I have in two cases found tubercle bacilli in the milk} but I have looked for them ever so many times and never found them. And recently I have given it up as a bad job and used other means. The expert in his laboratory sees the bacilli multiplying at the rate of 16,500,000 from a single germ in twenty-four hours, and if this ratio of increase should be carried on for five days, it would make a mass that would completely fill as large a space as is occupied by all the oceans on the earth surface, supposing them to have an average depth of one mile. He seems almost led to believe that the whole human race is soon to pass to the un- known from this infection. The dairyman looks at this picture , from a different standpoint. He is told by the veterinary that every animal from the mouse to the elephant Is subject to tuber- culosis. He sees the tuberculous mother fondling her children, and the children. playing daily with tuberculous cats and other animal pets; the dairymen many times daily associated with tuberculous cows, and all mankind often exposed in many ways to both human and bovine infection; and notwithstanding this the per cent of deaths from consumption annually grows less. While the honest farmer does not desire to sell diseased meat and milk to the consumer, he does feel that it should be well established that his herd is responsible for successful infection of man, before his property should be destroyed and his business ruined. No. 43.] 23 QUARANTINE. Several of the states that have made appropriations to eradi- cate or hold in control bovine tuberculosis have passed laws requiring all cattle kept for breeding purposes when brought into the state, to be accompanied by a certificate that they have suc- cessfully passed the tuberculin test; or they are held in quaran- tine after arrival until they have been so tested. A bill of a similar nature was introduced in each branch of the Legislature of this state last winter, but failed to pass. Pennsylvania has a state law which is claimed to work well but there is sufficient evidence that it has been often violated. In New Jersey the law is untried, as it only took effect No- vember 1, 1899. The state officials testified they would prefer free trade among the states, but as bordering states have such a law, they felt compelled to pass it for their own protection. Nearly the same law has been in existence in Massachusetts for some years. The president of the commission in that state testified in part as follows : — " A great deal of trouble comes out of the fact that the tests are not carefully and honestly made." Q. Do you think a reliable test could be made of milch cows or breeding animals that have been in a car a number of days or even for a day or so, do you think they would be in a fit condi- tion, to make a reliable test, without remaining off the car and being fed and getting in a normal condition first? A. I don't think you could get a reliable test under those cir- cumstances. I think the experience of the men at Brighton, shows that. I think 1894 or 1895 was the first time they required cows brought into Massachusetts from without the state to be tested, and held in quarantine. I think they had one hundred cows- react that winter, and when they killed them there were 24 [Assembly tw v enty healthy cows out of the hundred, showing the test wasn't a reliable one. The animals had not had time to rest and get in a normal condition. Our rule is now, if cattle are brought in here without being tested they are not tested until the.nextweek but are quarantined, and held until the end of the week, say five to seven days, arranged so they can be put on the market the end of the following week. I don't think they make any mistakes that way. But where they test as soon as unloaded, I think a great many mistakes are made. Q. Although you find difficulty in administering x the law for quarantining cattle, would you advise giving that up? A. We are in hopes we can get it working satisfactorily in time; the only way for us to do is to say that we will not accept the work of certain men and weed out those who are not honest, until we have enough honest men to do the work, if it is a pos- sible thing. Twenty-four thousand six hundred forty-two car-loads of cattle were unloaded at the stock yards at Buffalo during the year 1899, about 9 per cent, for breeding and dairy purposes. In all the states having a quarantine law against importation, a large per cent, of the cattle imported are examined after entry into the state. To get a fair test of these cattle would require their being held at Buffalo and other points of entry for about one week to get them in fit condition for examination with tubercu- lin. Dr. Nelson in his experiments found that two repeated tests with tuberculin within a few days had such an effect upon the animal examined, that she would not respond to a third test fol- lowing soon after the second, even though she had responded to the first and second test. To this evidence a large number of No. 43.] 25 veterinarians agree. It seems therefore that if a farmer desires to sell cattle for transportation into a state having a quaran- tine law, he could easily inject tuberculin twice within a few days, then call a veterinarian, and if he were' strictly honest, he would find no response, and a bill of health would be given. Thus the law could be evaded. From indications we fear that giving bribes for a bill of health has sometimes been practiced. Until other states have been able to execute this law in a successful manner it seems to the committee that it would be advisable for this state to adopt some other method to keep diseased cattle from the state rather than to adopt the so-called quarantine laws of the 1 states "about us. We believe that the benefits derived from such a law would not be sufficient to war- rant the delay and enormous expense to properly execute it. TUBERCULIN TEST. The following quotations are taken from an address by Dr. James Law, before the students of the New York State Veteri- nary College: " Much has been said and written against the tuberculin test by those who never used it, and who are therefore utterly incom- petent either to endorse or condemn it, but for those who aim at the prompt and thorough eradication of the infection from a herd, and at the securing at once of a guarantee of progeny, beef and dairy products, no resort can as regards its eflScacy be at all compared with the tuberculin test. k "Tuberculin is a sterile solution of the products of the artificial culture of the tubercle bacillus. In its' preparation it has been treated to a boiling temperature which is as fatal to the tubercle bacillus in liquid medium as it is to a hen's egg. But this is not all; even the dead bacilli have been separated from the liquid 2G [Assembly by passing it through a porcelain filter. The warming liquid (tuberculin) is absolutely sterile, and can plant and propagate neither the tubercle bacillus nor any other living thing. It can poison if given in excessive doses, as alcohol can poison, but it can no more produce the germ of tubercle where that does not exist than can distilled alcohol plant the yeast germ and start a new vinous fermentation. The insane fear of tuberculin is the fruit of an ignorance of its true nature and of a blind prejudice which withholds its victim from informing himself on the sub- ject. " The value of the agent consists in this, that the hypodermic injection of an appropriate dose in a tuberculous animal however lightly affected, produced in the course of the succeeding twenty- four hours a rise of body temperature and other indications of fever. The gradual rise and fall of the temperature in the, ab- sence of any other diseased or physiological "condition which would bring this about is the most reliable of all symptons of the presence of the disease. Upon the sound animal system such a dose of tuberculin produces no appreciable effect. " It is important, however, that I should not be misunderstood in this matter. The man who will use tuberculin without' due caution and without due consideration as to the condition and environment of the animal, and who blindly condemns on any rise of temperature will almost certainly condemn non-tuber- culous animals and bring the tuberculous test into discredit. The intelligent use of the test demands an intimate knowledge of the kind of animal tested, both in a healthy and diseased condi- tion and a careful scrutiny before and during the test." Dr. Law also gives these rules governing the use of tuber- culin : — No. 43.] 27 " 1st. The subject must be in good general health. "2nd. The subject must not be within three weeks of parturi- tion nor about to abort. In many cases, though not in all, as preparations are made for calving, the systen^ becomes unduly susceptible to the presence of tuberculin and that agent will cause a rise of temperature, though no tuberculosis is present. Unless this source of error is carefully guarded against the most valuable cows in the herd may be condemned unjustly. " 4th. The tested animals must not be exposed to a hot sun in a closed area. In excess this will cause heat apoplexy, and the fever heat which ushers this in may easily be mistaken for the indications of tuberculosis. " 5th. The cattle taken from the pasture must not be enclosed in a hot, stuffy stable. ".6th. Exposure to cold draughts between open doors and win- dows or wet or chilly blasts out of doors should be carefully guarded, against. " 7th. Heavy cows unaccustomed, to stand on hard boards may have a rise. of temperature, in connection with resulting tender- ness of the feet. One must avoid hard floors on the day of the test or make examinations of the feet and allow for attendant fever. " 8th. Omission of the previous milking or a change of milker and consequent retention of part of the milk, will raise the tem- perature of a nervous cow, and in careless hands secure an erro- neous condemnation. " 9thi Privation of water at regular time will often cause rise of temperature, especially when on the dry feeding of winter. I have seen a general rise of two degrees and upwards from the delay of watering for a single hour, while after watering the 28 [Assembly temperature went down to the normal and remained so. Water ■always tends to a temporary lowering of temperature, but in the .presence of tuberculosis it soon rises again. " 10th. Change of food is liable to produce a slight indigestion •and rise of temperature. This should be avoided as far as pos- sible, and when a herd is taken from pasture for the test it should *ave grass, ensilage or other succulent food. " These are examples of the sources of fallacy which attend on 4he reckless and unintelligent use of tuberculin. " 11th. An animal with advanced tuberculosis sometimes fails to react." In the evidence given on this subject by Dr. Julius Nelson of 2Tew Jersey, he said that he had generally accepted these rules •as given by Dr. l^aw, and would add the following, taken from his evidence: Q. I want to askyou, doctor, if you think strictly warm weather lias an influence on the normal condition of an animal? , A. Upon the normal condition of some animals. Q. You would not think it as safe to condemn an animal in hot -weather as under a moderate temperature? A. No, it is not as safe if a hot wave happens to coincide with -or follow an injection the next day. Q. Then you prefer not to test an animal during the hot -months? A. Not for practical purposes; there is a certain time, for in- stance in April, when the first hot days of spring come, cows get a fever, a spring fever, and that same air temperature in the fall would not affect them, but in the spring it does; or extra hot -waves in July or August are also very bad. Q. Then, doctor, it is a mere matter of judgment in the use of 4he tuberculin test? No. 43.] 29 A. Yes, sir; I have no fixed rule. Q. Is it a knowledge you can impart to another? A. I don't know. I think after studying the subject more and" if I had experience with a large number of animals I could make- a formula that could be used by another. Q. The accuracy of tuberculin depends more on a man's judg- ment than otherwise? A. The accuracy of tuberculin is correct up to a certain point,, but to get more accurate results requires all this careful work;: we get up to 90 per cent., but to get to 95 per cent, is very diffi- cult; we don't know as we will ever get to 100 per cent, of" accuracy. This evidence from such high authority would indicate that it was little less than criminal to place, this poison in the hands of" a man who has little knowledge of its use, and clothed with au- thority under the law of the state to enter any farm, take posses- sion of the herd, inject the tuberculin and condemn and place i»< quarantine all animals showing a rifee of temperature of two or- more degrees. The committee have found many instances in the^ testing of cattle with tuberculin where the foregoing rules were- apparently entirely ignored. About July 1,- 1899, thirty-three cows in one herd were exam- ined by the tuberculin test under the following conditions, as- sworn to by the owner : They were all in milk, were taken from the pasture at night, milked, the initial temperatures taken and the tuberculin injected. About midnight the herd were turned' in a small pasture, where feed Was very short and no water; the- next morning they were put in the barn and remained there dur- ing the day. The temperatures of each cow were taken every hour. They had dry hay only for food, and no water during the- 30 [Assembly entire test, covering a period of twenty-four hours. Under these conditions twenty-five cows were condemned and retained in quarantine. Six of the cows showed a rise of temperature of three degrees -or less; and two of them two degrees or less. It has been the practice in this state to take but a single so- called initial temperature. The evidence before the committee would indicate that this is not sufficient to perform the most per- fect work. The usual method of applying tuberculin in this state is as fol- lows : The temperature of each animal is taken about six o'clock in the evening; at this time each animal is marked by placing a numbered metal tag in the ear. About thirty drops of tubercu- lin is injected through the skin of the neck or shoulder of each animal weighing about one thousand pounds; after about eight' hours, the temperatures are again taken of each animal every two hours oftener during the following day. No definite rule is fixed as "to the minimum rise of temperature required to condemn an animal, but usually one showing a rise of two or more degrees above the first or initial temperature is condemned as tubercu- lous. Animals often show a temperature of two to four degrees above normal from other causes than tuberculin. It is the prac- tice therefore in other states, and undoubtedly a much safer plan for the temperature to be taken several times during the after- noon previous to the injection of tuberculin, or else the hours immediately following the injection of tuberculin, that a line of temperatures may be established. v In Canada five temperatures are taken before the injection of tuberculin. The so-called nor- mal temperature of some cows is a half to two degrees higher than that of others. It is also a little higher in the evening than in the morning in some animals. But if all the conditions are No. 43.] 31 normal the temperature of the same animal should be about the same at the same hour in the day. , Under an order passed by the Board of Health of the city of Syracuse, in the fall of 1898, all cows furnishing milk for the city were required to be tested with tuberculin. Under this order over four thousand cows were so examined, and only about four per cent, responded to the test. Five dairymen furnishing milk for the city were examined by the committee. One testified to the loss of one cow dhring the night after the injection, due ap- parently to the effect of the tuberculin — and the shrinkage in milk of the whole dairy for a day or two. Another testified that one cow was very sick the night after the injection — the usual number of quarts of milk from the herd per day was three hun- dred and fifty — the shrinkage the first day after the test was eighty, and the second day twenty-five quarts. Some had swell- ings at the point of injection, and were made stiff in the should- ers. Others testified to the bad effect of tuberculin on their herds to a greater or less extent. , It is fair to say that the dairy- men in this case were allowed to select their own veterinarians, only they must be properly licensed. The investigating com- miTttC* d^es not find that these bad results come from the proper use of good tuberculin, but from its use by incompetent men. The evil results to the dairymen of this state are, however, alike from either cause. The use of tuberculin in the most skillful hands will not detect the difference between an animal having a single encysted tubercle, and an animal well advanced with the disease. Cows in the advanced stages of the disease very often fail to respond to the test; and in some instances we find that cows which would be most apt to spread contagion to their fel- lows, or if possible to the human family, have been given a clean bill of health by the veterinarian making the examination. 32 [Assembly It is difficult to determine the exact percentage of cattle that respond to the tuberculin test in the entire state. Most of the examinations made have been those of herds that have been known or supposed to be diseased. In 1894, all of the cattle in a portion of the counties of Schenec- tady and Saratoga were examined with tuberculin; of the whole number examined (947), 71 cows were found to be diseased — a fraction over 7 per cent. About 4 per cent, of the 4,200 cows examined in the vicinity of Syracuse a year ago responded to the test. Other evidence would go to shoW that the percentage of cows that would respond to the tuberculin test in the entire state would probably not exceed 6 or 7 per cent. Some men have held that the use of tuberculin was oftentimes the cause of tuberculosis. As already quoted from Dr. Law this is impossible with properly prepared tuberculin. It is, however, believed by a good many that its use upon animals but slightly diseased, the germ being in a latent condition, has a tendency to rouse the germ and bring it into active life, thereby hastening the development of the disease. Upon this point, we quote again from Dr. Law on the effect of tuberculin. He says: "That it arouses into temporary activity the tuberculosis already existing in the unsound animal is true. Were it not so it would be use- less as a diagnostic agent. But if the state stands ready to destroy and pay for the diseased, there can be no possible objec- tion to the temporary aggravation which leads to the purifica- tion of the herd." » Dairymen of the highest standing in this state and with large experience with tuberculin have said, that its use upon animals but slightly diseased had unquestionably hastened its develop- ment, and they believe that many animals which would have No. 43.] 33 been valuable for breeding and milk producing to old age, have been sacrificed on this account. ' The committee finds that properly prepared tuberculin in the hands of skilled veterinarians is almost infallible as a diagnostic agent — but that its general use should not be forced upon the dairymen of the state, where all animals that respond to its use are compelled to be quarantined and slaughtered. INDEMNITY. The committee has already noted that in all of the states where the examination, quarantine and slaughter of tuberculous ani- mals is under state control, an indemnity is* paid to the owner of from one-half to the full value of the animal^ destroyed. The principle of indemnity is held by some to be wrong, but be that