AC CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Cornell University Library ACS .M42 In peril of change: essays wrtten n tl olln 3 1924 029 633 066 The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029633066 IN PERIL OF CHANGE IN PERIL OF CHANGE ESSAYS WRITTEN IN TIME OF TRANQUILLITY C. F. G. MASTERMAN, M.A. FELLOW OF Christ's college, Cambridge '•^JVe cannot but acknowledge that lue are not yet at rest: ttor can lue believe ive /lave yet enjoyed or seen enough to accomplish the ends of God" The Parliament to the People of England, 1653 NEW YORK B. W. HUEBSCH 150 NASSAU STREET (All rights ixscrvid.) Co NOEL BUXTON IN MBMOKT OF TEN YBAES OF FRIENDSHIP AND BFFOET IN A COMMON CAUSE. PBEFACE THE essays in this book represent an effort made in a time of tranquillity, to estimate forces which are making for change. Some are attempts to examine the ideals of the age immediately past, as one by one the voices of the nineteenth century have sunk into silence. Some deal vrith the life of the present, endeavouring to reflect some immediate impression of the panorama of life as it passes by. And some are concerned with the future, seeking to interpret, in literature, in religion, in social ideals, those obscure beginnings which are to direct the progi'ess of the years to come. In every case I have been less interested in the manner of saying than in the thing said. Literature has only been called in to pronounce its verdict upon the business of life. It is this business of life, the experience of a hunying present, which is the one absorbing question : the actual high effort, apathy or despair crowded into that interval when to-morrow is becoming yesterday. To some the procession passes as a pageant, to others as a masquerade, to others again as a funeral march with the sound of solemn music. But to all in that moment a world has perished, a world been born. xi PREFACE If the note is in general sombre, with the sadness of things more emphatic than their splendour, I can only plead an experience more than usually complex and baffling, spent in communication less with the triumphs of civilisation than with its failures. Expectancy and surprise are the notes of the age. Expectancy belongs by nature to a time balanced uneasily between two great periods of change. On the one hand is a past still showing faint survivals of vitality; on the other is the future but hardly coming to birth. The years as they pass still appear as years of preparation, a time of waiting rather than a time of action. Surprise, again, is probably the first im- pression of all who look on, detached from the eager traf&c of man. The spectator sees him per- forming the same antics in the same grave fashion as in all the past: heaping up wealth which another shall inherit, following pleasure which turns to dust in the mouth, and the end weariness : thinking, as always, that he will endure for ever, and calling after his own name the place which shall know him no more. But surprise passes into astonishment in confronting the particular and special features of the age. Here is a civilisation becoming ever more divorced from Natm-e and the ancient sanities, protesting thi'ough its literatm-e a kind of cosmic weariness. Society which had started on its mechanical advance and the aggrandisement of material goods with the buoyancy of an impetuous life confronts a poverty which it can neither ameliorate nor destroy, and an organised discontent which may yet prove the end of the Western civilisation. Faith in the invisible seems dying, and faith in the visible is proving inadequate to the hunger of the soul. The city state, concentrated in such a centre as London xii PREFACE remains as meaningless and as impossible to co-ordinate with any theory of spiritual purposes as the law of gravitation itself. Experience in the heart of such a universe of neces- sity takes upon itself a character of bewilderment. Those whom I loved have died : and the miracle of their parting has seemed more strange than the miracle of their presence. I have seen so many sunsets, so many radiant dawns. This man has failed and that succeeded, and both have grown tired of it all. "What right have I to grieve," as Thoreau said, "who have not ceased to wonder ? " And I think that I am not alone in longing for a time when literature will once more be concerned with life, and politics with the welfare of the people : and religion fall back again upon reality: and pity and laughter return into the common ways of men. xm CONTENTS PASB AFTER THE REACTION 1 DE MORTUIS: 37 William Eenest Henley . . , . .39 J. HjjNBY Shobthouse ..... 45 HfiNBT SiDOWIOK . , , . . .51 Peedebio Mydes ..... 60 GEOBaB GlSBING . . . . . .68 SPEHOEE AND OaBLYLE : A COMPARISON . . 74 dlsbabll and gladstone : a oontbast . . .97 The Chubch Militant : Temple, Westcott, Oeeighton, Dolling ...... 115 BEFORE THE DAWN: 145 June in England ..... 147 In Dejection nbae Tooting . . . .155 The Bubden of London .... 159 The New Revolution . . . . .167 The Blasphemy ov Optimism . . . .173 Chicago and Fbancis ..... 180 The Making of the Superman . . . 190 XV CONTENTS PAQE THE CHALLENGE OP TIME . . . .213 OF DEATH AND PITY . . . .233 THE RELIGION OP THE CITY . . .257 IN PBEIL OP CHANGE BOX XVI AFTER THE REACTION " Yea, if no morning must behold Man, other than were they now cold. And other deeds than past deeds done, Nor any near or far-off sum Salute him risen and sunlihe-souled, Free, boundless, fearless, perfect, one. Let man's world die liTce worlds of old, And here in heaven's sight only be The sole sun on the worldless sea." SWINBUENB, AFTER THE BE ACTION LITEEATUEE as detached as is the literature of to-day from the middle and working classes, the unconscious rulers of England, would appear to be independent of the actual processes of political and social change. A few vigorous story-tellers, a group of writers of pleasant yerse, some young and clever journalists, vrill initiate a literary " movement " ; which will take itself seriously, parade a pomp and circumstance, and continue until the respectabilities of advancing age, and often, alas ! the revelations of a failing inspiration, have once again demonstrated the triumph of time and change. Yet this emphasis of aloofness is not the whole truth. Literature, indeed, has no direct concern with the dust of the party struggle, with bills of licensing or local government. But the larger transitions of the period, the spirit which underlies some definite upheaval, whose appearance in the world of action astonishes the un- thinking, is certain to find itself first articulate in the universe of art. Estimate in that universe a vital move- ment of revolt from some accepted tradition or ideal; you will be estimating a force which in no long time is destined to enter into the play of outward affairs and to mould the courses of the world. No better example could be advanced than the history 3 AFTER THE REACTION of the Eeaction in tlie later years of the nineteenth century. Weary of the long effort of reform, a little bored by the strenuousness of the appeal to disinterested causes, conscious of the possession of unparalleled means of enjoyment, and of great possessions, the nation was evidently prepared for a new spirit, a new inspiration. That spirit and inspiration came with the Reaction ; whose literature some fifteen years ago revealed the only confident and secure proclamation of any kind of definite appeal. As the former enthusiasms subsided and the former systems were found unsatisfying ; as, in a word, the new England disentangled itself from the old ; so the message proclaimed by a few men of genius, and diffused through a thousand obscure channels in Press and platform, became suddenly arresting : and now stands crystallised as the product characteristic of those extraordinary years. The contrast was glaring between the literature of the earlier Victorian era and the literature of the closing days. The old had been cosmopolitan. The new was Imperial. The old had proclaimed the glory of the " one imperishable cause," allied through all lands ; the struggle for liberty against the accumulated atheisms of a dozen centuries. The new was frankly Tory ; with the Tory scofiing at the futilities of freedom, described now as a squalid uprising of the discontented against their masters. The old had been " Liberal " ; in that wide definition including such extremes as a Browning and a Tennyson. The new branded Liberalism as but a gigantic fraud by which the weak deluded the strong into an abnegation of their natural domination. The old had been humanitarian ; preaching, if with a some- what thick voice, yet with a sanguine air, the coming of the golden age. War would be abandoned as irrational 4 AFTER THE REACTION A free and uniTersal trade would bind the nations into one brotherhood. The sweet reasonableness of the English character would shine forth its radiance through all the envious nations of the world. The new had no such hopes or dreams. It revolted always against the domina- tion of the bourgeois. It estimated commerce as a means of conflict and a weapon of offence. It clamoured for the ancient Barbarism ; and delighted in war ; and would spread an English civilisation, not by the diffusion of its ideas but by the destruction of its enemies. It was a message of vigour and revolt congruous to a nation wearied of the drabnesa of its uniform successes ; with the dissatisfaction and vague restlessness which come both to individuals and communities after long periods of order and tranquillity. To the friends of progress the dominance of such a spirit seemed of the elements of tragedy. Literature, after its long alliance with the party of reform, had deliberately deserted to the enemy. In the minds of the few faithful the dismay was some- what similar to that aroused in the defenders of the inviolate city, when the Shekinah departed from the courts of the temple and passed over to the camp of its foes. This new spirit of the Eeaction gathered itself especially round two men, each possessing more than a touch of genius — Mr. W. E. Henley and Mr. Rudyard Kipling. Mr. Henley's denunciation of the accepted codes of life, the thirst for blood and violence of one physically debarred from adventure, became reflected in a hundred eager followers, who plied the axe and hammer of sneer and gibe round the humanitarian ideal and the house of the good citizen. Mr. Kipling's proclamation of the Imperial race co-operating with God in the bloody destruction of alien peoples was interpreted 5 AFTER THE REACTION into tlie commonplaces of a journalism demanding above all things sensation. The toiler of the cities in his life of grey monotony, labouring for another's wealth, found existence suddenly slashed with crimson. And every morning the astonished clerk was exalted by the intelli- gence of his devastation of Afghanistan, or civilisation of Zanzibar, or slaughter of ten thousand fantastic Dervishes in a night and a day. It was a literature of the security of a confident triumph; with that quality which distinguishes the work of a dawn from the work of a declining day. Its appeal was to enduring elements of human emotion. It proclaimed the supremacy of England, a mother, worth dying and living for; her children seeking danger as a bride, searching all the confines of the world; encountering and joyfully mastering enemies and natural forces, the winds and the seas and the terrors of elemental things. There were visions of ships steering through deep waters and harvests gathered from all seas ; of the pioneers whose hones have marked the track for the advancing army that this might follow where these had trod ; of the flag of England descried amid mist and cold or under the Southern sun as every- where triumphant by the testimony of all the winds of heaven. It was a literature of intoxication ; adequate to a nation which, having conquered the world in a fit of absence of mind, had suddenly become conscious of the splendour of its achievement. Small wonder that to the eyes of the men of the time there came with it something of the force of a gospel ; as the boundaries of their thought lifted to disclose larger horizons than they had ever known. It was a literature, on the other hand, of a rather forced ferocity; of an academic enthusiasm for the 6 AFTER THE REACTION noise and trappings of war; the work of men who despised death because there was present in their minds, not death as a reality but only death as an idea. It preached a boastful insularity ; with a whole- hearted contempt for disloyal Ireland or the cretins of the continent. The Briton was revealed to himself, a majestic figure, lord of the earth, who, with the approba- tion of God, but by the power of his own right arm, had gotten himself the victory. It presented a figure of the Imperial race, like Nietzsche's Overman, trampling over the ineffective, crushing opposing nations, boasting an iron supremacy, administering an iron justice. It thought scorn of all the ideals of philanthropy of the middle classes, with their timidities and reticence and dull routine ; of the poor with the clumsiness of their ineffectual squalor. " More chops, bloody ones with gristle," — so a critic has summed up in Mr. Kipling's own words, his demand from life. It neglected and despised the ancient pieties of an older England, the little isle set in its silver sea. Greatness became big- ness ; specific national feeling parochial. Imperial Destiny replaced national well-being ; and men were no longer asked to pursue the "iust" course, but to approve the "inevitable." The thing lasted only so long as it could keep divorced from real things and confined to its world of illusion. While British wars consisted of battues of blacks, with the minimum of loss and pain to ourselves, the falsity of the atmosphere of Mr. Kipling's battle tales was nndiscoverable. The blind and gibbering maniac at the end of " The Light that Failed," who shrieks^ "Give 'em Hell, men, oh, give 'em Hell," from the security of an armoured train, while his companions annihilate their enemies by pressing the button of 7 AFTER THE REACTION a macbine gun, seemed not only a possible but even a reputable figure. The sport of such " good hunting " — " the lordliest life on earth " — was not recounted by the historian of the hunted, the tribes of the hills whose land was laid desolate and wells choked up and palm- trees cut down and villages destroyed, who were joyfully butchered to make an Imperial holiday. Their verdict upon such "hunting" might have been less exuberant. As Newman said in his defence of Catholics in England, "Lions would have fared better, had lions been the artists." With the outbreak of real war and some apprehension of its meaning the spell snapped. Directly Mr. Kipling commenced to write of the actual conflict in South Africa, the note suddenly jarred and rang false. His judgment was found to be concerned not with war but with the idea of war ; the conception in the brain of a journalist. The jauntiness and cocksureness, the surface swagger, were suddenly confronted with realities; — Death and Loss and Longing. " There was a good killing at Paardeherg; the first satisfactory killing of the whole war " ; — this attitude immediately disclosed its essential vulgarity; a grimace from the teeth out- wards ; war as viewed from Capel Court or Whitechapel, or any other place where men are noisy and impotent. Eeal war gave indeed a revelation of high sacrifice, the coming of the " fire of Prometheus " into the common ways of men; flaming up under the stress of a vast upheaval in the conflict of life and of death. It was not given to the Apostles of the New Imperialism to estimate or even to understand those deeper tides of the human soul. Their conception was of war carried on in the spirit of the music-hall comedy ; the men at the close of the struggle wiping their hands which have successfully AFTER THE REACTION gouged out the eyes of their enemies, while they hum the latest popular song. It was left for another poet of a different spirit, Mr. Henry Newbolt, to voice the common- place of an unchanging tragedy in the only memorable verse called forth by this three years' struggle. With the coming of a war which it had so furiously demanded, the literature of the Reaction fell, first into shrillness, then into silence. Read to-day, the whole thing stands remote and fantastic, the child of a time infinitely far away. Of its authors, some are dead ; and some continue a strange shadowy life in an alien time. Mr. Kipling compiles such mournful productions as " Traffics and Discoveries." But the pipe fails to awaken any responsive echoes. Even those who before had approved now turn away their heads. He appears like one dancing and grimacing in the midst of the set grave faces of a silent company. And so of the others. Mr. Street, one of the briskest of the disciples who once were young, contributes long letters on Tariff Reform to the columns of the Times. They suggest nothing so much as the return from beyond the grave of the tenuous phantoms of the Greek heroes. The spectacle is not without its pathos. We have not changed, these writers may complain. Here is the same music which you once approved, which once moved you clumsily to caper in the market place. What has caused the charm suddenly to cease? It has ceased — is the reply — because your world of phantasy has been judged and condemned by real things ; because with that judgment a new Spirit is dawning in England. This new Spirit should make its first appearance in 9 AFTER THE REACTION literature. And the question immediately arises: can we estimate to-day anything confident and Yital which can be interpreted as the work of the pioneers, the Spring of a Summer to be? We shall find, I think, on examination two classes of such writings. The first is of those who growing up under the spirit and dominance of the Reaction, have yet refused to give it their allegiance ; a Literature of protest coloured by a sense of isolation from the ideals of its age. The second is of those developing when that dominance is passing away, and who exhibit there- fore all the security and triumph which comes from the conviction of a winning cause. Of the first, the most noteworthy name is of one who has always stood apart and alone, whose verse is everywhere conscious of a popular indifference and estrangement. The work of Mr. William Watson will be judged in the future with that of Mr. Rudyard Kipling as representing a conflict of ideas which go down to the basis of man's being. The very methods reflect the diversified ideals. The one is detached, elusive, cold ; standing apart upon the height ; content in a serenity and a fastidious taste in words. The other is coloured, barbaric, human ; tumid and rhetori- cal; moving and rejoicing in the every-day world; vital, appealing and alive. The one "magnificently imperturbed," preaches always a vehement, if austere, virtue ; judging the present by the ancient traditions of an older time, by a past consecration of eflFort and sympathy in disinterested service. The other beats with the emotion of a crowd ; from the mi 'st of which, and as its voice, he directs men's gaze towards an illimitable future. And the changes of the time could be no better 10 AFTER THE REACTION illustrated than in the comparison of two appeals. In "The Purple East," contrasted with "The Seven Seas," the divergence is manifest between one who is speaking the mind of a nation and one obviously beyond its sympathies. Mr. Watson demanded with the violence of despair that England should accept the obligations of her deliberate responsibility, and embark in the spirit of the crusaders upon the vindication of an unchanging justice. And the note of a baffling indifference and defeat is over all the volume. Mr. Kipling sang of the glories and the greatness of an Empire swollen into one-eighth of the habitable world and splashed around the seven seas ; and every line of his vigorous verse seems punctuated with the applause of invisible multitudes. Ten years after appear two other volumes, almost contemporaneous. The time has changed. The wheel has come full circle. In " For England " there breathes through every page the consciousness of vindi- cation, an appeal to a judgment which even now has proclaimed an honourable acquittal. In " The Five Nations" the rhetoric has passed into bombast; an audience slipping away or turning their backs is every- where apparent. The sneers at_indifference, theheaped- up insults upon "fools" and "oafs," the jibes and abuse hurled upon a nation which will not rise to the new gospel, stamp upon the whole mournful volume the consciousness of failure. In the one is the jealousy of the discarded favourite ; — "And ye vaunted your fathomless power and ye flaunted your iron pride, Ere ye fawned on the younger nations for the men who could shoot and ride. 11 AFTER THE REACTION Then ye returned to your trinkets; then ye contented your soul With the flanneled fools at the wicket and the muddied oafs at the goal." In the other is the dignity of confidence secure in an ultimate verdict which is independent of man's applause : — "Friend, call me what you will: no jot care I; I that shall stand for England till I die. * 51: * * The England from whose side I have not swerved; The immortal England whom I, too, have served, Accoimting her all Hving lands above, In Justice, and in Mercy, and iu Love." With the passing of the hitter days we may hope for an increased consciousness of sympathy with an England immortal and secure, restored to sanity and desirable life after the fever of its dreams. Next to the work of this isolated figure you may turn to the work of a school. One original inspiration has survived through all the clamorous days, in that particular literature of Ireland which has disdained the noise of the Eeaction. That literature boosts many men and women of rare and delicate talent : one, Mr. George Russell, of a real if remote genius ; and one, Mr. W. B. Yeats, with the power of a universal appeal. Mr. Yeats stands for the genius of the Celt ; not unmixed, indeed, with a mysticism culled from other sources ; but more than any other individual writer now representing the soul of a nation. He is the outstand- ing figure in a literary movement which is one of the few vital things in the world of to-day. The movement 12 AFTER THE REACTION is the child of a Nationalism which is the antithesis of Imperialism, whose scene is set in one of the great tragic failures of the world. From the heart of that failure, from a race as it would seem visibly dying in its own land, Mr. Yeats and his comrades pro- claimed their judgment of the forces to which has been given domination. This " progress," with its noise and bustle, its material opulence, its destruction of all old and beautiful and quiet things, stand ever- lastingly condemned by one whose first search is for the Rose of an undying beauty, whose concern is only with the ardours and hungers of the soul. He looks out upon the tumult and the shouting, the noise and splendour of passing things. He learns that Tenderness, Compassion, Humility, those white-winged angels of healing, find no place in this hot and heavy air. He stands aside, an apostle of defeat ; of defeat yet triumphant in its fall ; deliberately proclaiming allegiance to the vanquished cause. " They went out to battle but they always fell " is written over all this haunting and musical verse, this haunting and appealing prose. And into the old legends, mingled of dreams and shadows, from twilights and dim dawns, the mystery and the sadness of moving waters and hidden places, the vsdnd among the reeds, the rose-leaves falling in the garden, he has woven, with something of the quality of magic, all the sorrow of an elegy over a doomed and passing race. Beauty and the love of beauty, the old things, visions in the sunset, dreams by the fire light, are passing from the world. The note of that passing and of the judgment of the destructive forces enters into a kind of exultant rejection of a civilisation which carries even in its victory the seeds of decay; which has 13 AFTER THE REACTION received its heart's desire and leanness, in tlie soul. Here is the defiance of one who notes that all the noise and triumph of his conquerors will one day also hecome ashes and a little dust. So the dominant note of the work of his attractive, wayward genius is this sadness and appeal. All the soul's longing turns from the call of the wind and shadowy waters, from a world ravaged by change and time, to the "Land of the ever young," and the "Land of Heart's Desire." "It is time now to go into the glens," he can say with Don-nacha'Ban, "for gloom is falling on the mountains and mists shroud the hills," " There is enough evil in the crying of wind " ; " For the world's more full of weeping than you can under- stand " : so runs the record of ruin and pain : — " We who still labour by the cromlech on the shore, The grey cairn on the hill when day sinks drowned in dew, Being weary of the world's Empires bow down to you. — " Weariness of the world's Empires ; the " vanity of Sleep, Hope, Dream, endless Desire " ; a defiant estrangement from all the courses of the world, hecome visibly flat, stale and unprofitable, are written over all this literature of protest and sorrow. Beauty passes as a dream ; and " we and the labouring world are passing by " ; and the consolation chiefly rests in the knowledge that one day all will have gone, good and evil, man's laughter and his tears, the yearning which can never be satisfied. " God's wars " will end, not in victory, but in silence. " And when at last defeated in His wars, They have gone down under the same white stars, We shall no longer hear the little cry Of our sad hearts, that may not live nor die." 14 AFTER THE REACTION In his later work, indeed, Mr. Yeats has proclaimed a real Eastern Nihilism. He sings the triumph of Death and nothingness. Du Bellay's " Le Grandeur du Rien " is set up as the consummation of all things. And the soul rejoices that eyen "Le Grand tout " into which " all other things pass and lose themselves " is " some time itself to perish and pass away." In that remarkable play, "Where there is Nothing," which perplexed the inhabitants of Kensington on its perform- ance and provided food for the humours of the dramatic critics, there is an almost passionate expression of this hatred of " making things," this hunger for the primi- tive abyss and void. Paul Ruttledge, the hero, is a kind of wild Tolstoy preaching the return, not to nature, hut to nothingness. He seeks satisfaction first in the escape from the artificiality of society to life with the tinkers on the open road ; later in the asceticism of the monastery; and then again to the simplicities of the ruined abbey and bare subsistence from day to day. His followers who have been attracted by his preaching totally misunderstand this new gospel of despair, and are found planning to build up again all which he has destroyed. In the passage, which forms the climax of the play, the apostle of Nihilism proclaims his faith : — " Oh ! yes, I understand, you would weave them together like this (weaves the osiers in and out), you would add one thing to another, laws and money and Church and bells, till you had got everything back again that you had escaped from. But it is my business to tear things asunder like this (tears pieces from the basket), and this, and this — " " At last," he cries, in the crypt of the church, " we must put out the light of the Sun and of the Moon, and all the light of the World and the World itself. We 15 AFTER THE REACTION must destroy the World ; we must destroy everything that has Law and Number, for where there is nothing, there is Grod." Yet at other times this assertion of the ultimate triumph of cold and darkness gives place to a hope that the weak things of the world may even at the end overcome the strong; and Beauty and Eomance and the old Desires of the heart and the Vision of far spiritual horizons return again into the ways of men. " The movement of thought," Mr. Yeats proclaims, "which has made the good citizen, or has been made by him, has surrounded us with comfort and safety and with vulgarity and insincerity. One finds alike its energy and its weariness in churches which have substituted a system of morals for spiritual ardour, in pictures which have substituted conventionally pretty faces for the disquieting revelations of sincerity, in poets who have set the praises of those things good citizens think praiseworthy above a dangerous delight in beauty for the sake of beauty." But while the old is crumbling the new is building. Sometimes the hope is triumphant that " the golden age is to come again and men's hearts and the weather to grow gentle, as time fades into eternity " ; and at times a confidence awakens in the coming of "a change, which, begun in our time or not for centuries, will one day make all lands holy lands again." Mr. Yeats, in part as the expression of a national movement, more, perhaps, through the compelling force of his talent, has attained even under the uncongenial skies of the Eeaction some recognition of his sincerity and power. An English author, Mr. H. W. Nevinson, no less individual and arresting, and far less remote 16 AFTER THE REACTION from ideala definitely English, has waited longer for acceptance. Like Mr. Yeats, he belongs to a period of protest — ^protest against a dominant spirit whose de- parture seemed far distant. This protest has taken varied forms. He has translated into literature the appeal of the poor against the cruel indifference and, perhaps, more cruel "charity" of the rich. He has voiced the protest of the little nations with their particular civilisations against an Imperialism which rolls as a Juggernaut car, guided by sightless eyes, not deliberately but clumsily, over all their variegated lives. He has set up for judgment by the ancient, way- ward things of man's existence, its high ardours, its delight in the charged spirit of emotion, love and battle and the open road, a civilisation spreading its by-laws and decencies over all the broken lands, and estimating its progress by its expenditure upon sanitation and the dimensions of its public lavatories. Against such " progress " he has appealed always for those elements of transfiguring flame by which alone man apprehends something of life and its purposes. Behind " the set grey life and apathetic end," he has discerned the flare of the fires of Prometheus. Beneath the noise of the cities he can hear the pipe of Pan among the reeds. In the midst of experience, set in custom and routine, he can exalt the moments, rare and imperishable, in which the " pent-up spirit " breaks through into Eternity. Mr. Nevinson is a child of Shrewsbury and Oxford, of both of which he has written with that love for particular places which is the essence of the spirit of patriotism. He has lived in a block-dwelling; and from that life came the writing of " Neighbours of Ours," the best volume of tales which ever took as their theatre of 17 AFTER THE REACTION action the desolate and fascinating region of the "East End." The contrast between the Eeaction and the newer spirit is conspicuous in the comparison of Mr. Nevinson's stories of the life of the poor with the fruitful crop of pictures of slum life — the mean street, the Jago, " Badalia Herodsfoot " or " 'Liza of Lambeth " — which developed under the inspiration of that insistent tyranny. The cleverness, the essential ignorance of the journalist who prowls through the streets of poverty as he would prowl through the interior of China seeking copy; — with the same eye for picturesque effect and the same contempt for its peoples, splashing on the canvas his hard yellows and purples — is revealed in its insolence by the work of one who has lived in sym- pathy and comradeship with those who have failed. Mr. Nevinson's stories — notably the " St. George of Koohester " and " Father Christmas " — ^may be com- mended to all who would understand the meaning of tenderness and a man's compassion for the men and women and children who are trampled under in the modern struggle, the crowd whose acquiescence is more tragical than its despau*. From the homes of poverty Mr. Nevinson passed into the larger world ; to see cities and men ; and everywhere the strong triumphant and the weak suffering. He was present at the pitiful comedy of the thirty days' war in Greece ; present also at the more pitiful tragedy of the destruction of two free nations in South Africa amid the heroism of the one side and the other. From these and the lessons learnt in them, from the " things seen " in the great moments of life and the quiet interludes " Between the Acts," he has collected those volumes of impression and appeal which have revealed his power in literature. 18 AFTER THE REACTION Two elements mingle in all his work. The one is pagan, the plea of Pan, the protest of the " Savage Soul." It is life passion protesting against the cramp- ing boundaries of convention and dead things. The other is Pity, learnt by the older gods in the watching of the human tragedy through so many hurrying cen- turies ; pity for all who find themselves with the few against the many, crushed by the clumsiness and violence of the world. The one thing which appears to him intolerable is the rotting at ease. The one tragedy is the burning out of high emotion into a little heap of ashes. " To grow fat and foul in clubs and country- houses," is the nightmare of one of his characters, " till I slime away in the funeral of an elderly country gentle- man who had been in the ai;my once." Against this vision of the faint-hearted he exalts the company of the warrior saints. "Life piled on life were all too little for the unquenchable passion of my eyes." The praises of a mechanical civilisation leave him cold. " To set two bulging, flat-footed gentlemen," is his verdict, "to stand on a flagstone instead of one, seems an unworthy aim for Evolution after all its labours." Pan is not dead. He but waits, a little contemptuous of it all till the tyranny be overpast. Even in the heart of tranquillity and rational order he can still be found disguised : a wanderer : abiding his time and sure of his ultimate triumph. He appears in Greece, his old home, with all the pageant of an unchallenged beauty, hill and heather, and violet sea. He is found again by the ancient wall across Britain marking the boundaries of another Empire which once thought itself immortal. His laughter startles the Cathedral close as he mocks the anger of the Canon against his seiTant, Elizabeth, for 19 AFTER THE REACTION her transgression with her soldier-lover. He is present with the new knowledge of pity upon the war-scarred slopes of Waggon Hill above Ladysmith in the clear night after the storm of men and elements, watching over the bodies of the dead. The contrast between this vision on the hillside, the mingled sorrow and rejoicing over the body of a dead peasant, with any of Mr. Kipling's latest tales, " The Captive," or, " Private Capper," will reveal the meaning of a change. All the music-hall song and cleverness have vanished from the horizon of this poor sightless body. Not in this lies its greatness : but in that Divine Fire which entered into the heart of him as he moved through the slow routine of his toil, and drove him out here from his dear home into the battle in passionate response to the call of the Fatherland : and has left him here at evening, with all the story told ; the dust gathering on his lips, silent in the summer rain. The author will re-echo the protest of Pan against the plaint of the priest at man's seeming vnckedness. Surveying the long course of history, he vrill testify with something approaching awe to an endurance and indomitable will which raises him above the level of the older gods. There is a passage in this testimony not unworthy to be placed with Lamennais's " Hymn of the Dead," or Stevenson's awful vision in " Pulvis et Umbra " :— " They appear and are gone. Like shipwrecked boys they are cast upon the shoals of time, and drop off into darkness. No research of history, no deciphering of village tombs can ever recover them. We think that somewhere they may still lie nestled up, with all their age about them ; but even darkness holds them no more, 20 AFTER THE REACTION They stood on this flying earth, we see their footsteps, we hear the thin ghost of their voices, and on the stones lies the touch of their dead hands, but they are nowhere to be found at all. They knew how short their dear life was, yet they filled it with labour and unrecorded toil. Morning and night, through their little space of minutes, they struggled and agonised to keep on living and feed their children for the struggle and agony of a few minutes more. The sun blasted them, ice devoured their flesh, their mouths were mad with thirst, hunger twisted them with cramps, plague consumed them, they rotted as they stood, bolts of torture drove through their brains, their bodies were clamped into hoops ; in battle, in child-bed they died with extremity of pain. Yet they endured, and into the chinks and loopholes of their misery they crammed laughter and beauty and a passion transfiguring them beyond the semblance of the gods." 'Tis a sombre picture; yet not without its triamph. " Let us leave it to the priests to marvel at men's wickedness," he cries at the end. " Over any such thing as love or laughter in the heart of man I could stand astonished with admiration throughout the life- time of a god." The work of these writers is written, in Mr. Watson's phrase, "in estrangement." Over all is the conscious- ness of battle upon a losing side. They have kept the faith in a dark hour when all the world seemed against them. The tumult swept past them. They stood alone, alien in spirit from the company : from the noisy rout, which seemed the procession of an unending day. With the visible passing of all this clamour has come the growth of a newer spirit, with an ardour and buoyancy 21 AFTER THE REACTION lacking in those who suffered from its domination. Such is the spirit of those younger writers who first have apprehended that the Eeaction, instead of being living and dominant, was become at heart dead and sterile. Of such, two of the most vigorous to-day are Mr. Hilaire Belloc and Mr. Gilbert Chesterton. Mr. Belloc has produced work which is excellent in itself and more excellent in its promise of better things to come. He exhibits especially two qualities always rare in English writing — the quality of rhetoric and the quality of irony. His earlier works, studies of the Kevolution, Danton and Robespienre, are full of the triumph of human personality over the influences of outward things. His work, like the architecture of that Middle Age which he loves so ardently, reveals the union of this spirit of romance with the spirit of laughter. The high roofs and spires are mingled with the gargoyles and grotesques, and all the humour and aspiration which gave its life to the greatest century which the world has ever seen. He will pass from the record of romance to the roaring satire of "Dr. Caliban," or collaboration with Mr. Chesterton in the ridiculing of the Tariff Eeform Commission. High spirits and a kind of elemental energy are charac- teristic of all his work. No present-day writing conveys so much the impression of a huge enjoyment in its prepa- ration. Much of Mr. Belloc's humour is indeed recondite, written to please himself and for the few who will under- stand ; the decent citizen but becomes conscious that some one is laughing at him as indignant he hurries by. In " The Path to Eome," the most popular of all his books, this vitality is everywhere present. Youth, its sincerity, its self-sufSciency, its vigour and hope and gnormous dreams, is present in all this record of pij. 22 AFTER THE REACTION grimage. As the traveller swings out from Toul in the sunset by the Nancy gate and strikes in a bee-line across the backbone of Europe to the goal of his wandering, he pours out all his experience of outer and inner things. He makes up songs, and sings them as he journeys, in dispraise of heretics or praise of God. He finds companionship in the common people, the people pf the road, the people of the villages, away from the dust of the cities. He apprehends " the solid form of Europe under him like a rock" ; unchanged and permanent, beside which all the noise of progress appears but vaporous and transitory. In the story of "Emmanuel Burden," Mr. Belloc's ironical method has attained its clearest expression. The elaborate satire penetrates every page; from the pompous parody of the title, through the nonsense of the preface, to the Burden genealogies designed in the futile exactitude of the three-volume biography. To nine out of ten, reading, as they think, a dull and straightforward narrative, all this will appear very tedious. But in the underlying spirit there is a marked and momentous change from the spirit of the social satire of fifteen years ago. The literature of the Reaction found the subject of all its humours in the middle-class tradesman. It was never tired of mocking at his outlook, his contempt for art and literature and all ideas, his confinement within the grooves of sectarian- ism and the making of money. To these clever young men Mr. Grundy, the husband of the dictator of the suburbs, was the subject of an unfailing ridicule. They pelted him with epigram. They caricatured his decen- cies and devotions. They rolled the poor old gentleman in the gutter and departed laughing hugely at their own BjnartnesB and bis bleats of indignation, 23 AFTER THE REACTION With Mr. Belloc the process is reversed. Satire has come over to the other side. Over against the new wits, the cleverness engaged in the intervals of self- indulgence in running (or ruiniag) an Empire ; with its surface sparkle and its inner emptiness and frivolity, Mr. Grundy with his tenacity, his simplicity, his austere devotion to duty, appears as an entirely reputable figure. Mr. Burden is Mr. Grundy, the "honest man and good citizen," ironmonger of Thames Street. In his side whiskers and frock-coat, as depicted by Mr. Chesterton, with his impossible mid- Victorian residence at Avon- more, Alexandrovna Eoad, Upper Norwood, with his forty years' daily devotion to his trade, " his home, manner and habit of life seemed to me who knew him to be always England, England." "To see him open his umbrella was to comprehend England from the Reform Bill to Home Rule." Against this old and passing England, the England which had built up the great heritage of Empire, Mr. Belloc exhibits the dismal crowd who have entered into that goodwill and seems determined upon its destruc- tion. Here are the children of the old, mocking at the limitations of their fathers ; cosmopolitan financiers of Semitic origin, exploiting, ostensibly, remote marshes, in reality the British public, under the sonorous clap- trap of " Empire Expansion " ; broken down relics of the feudal system compelled to re-establish their shat- tered fortunes ; the new yellow journalism ; and the rank and file of greedy persons of all classes who rushed into the flotation, as clergymen and society ladies and respectable country gentlemen rushed into the gigantic gambling in South Africans which preceded the Jameson Raid. These are the figures which fill the foreground of the flotation of the M'Korio Delta 24 AFTER THE REACTION Development Co. Experience of the bitter food of those astonishing nineties in England, the Hooley scandals, the Liberator, the Chartered Company, Whitaker Wright, are woven into a satire in which the restraint of the irony scarcely veils the passionate protest against all this new corruption of a nation marching down calamitous ways. In such a morass of foulness Mr. Burden is engulfed. He finds himself immediately in the toils, surrounded by vague forces of evil. There is nothing definite. The outline moves. As soon as he strikes out, the walls, which seemed to be closing around him, part aside and elude his blows. The business is of a kind to which he is unaccustomed. The suavity and plausi- bility of his confederates are equal to aU his approaches. There is a spirit in the air, in the public Press, around the office of the company, a miasma which poisons the blood and turns the balance of the brain. Although the shares still stand high and there is outward pros- perity, the conviction deepens that he is in the grasp of unclean forces. He is troubled in the daytime with a haunting sense of shame, at night by monstrous dreams. The attempt of his colleagues to " freeze out " his friend, Mr. Abbott (another absurd, early-Victorian figure), who had refused to " come in," produces a climax. The poor, bewildered mind breaks under the strain. Mr. Burden, feeling actually in the presence of a crowd, " the massed forces of this new world surging against him," in one great scene of fury de- nounces all his fellow-directors as rogues and thieves and scum, and reels home to Upper Norwood to die. The death scene is not inadequate to life's perpetual irony. On the one hand is the outward, pitiful and grotesque incident : a stout old man, muttering gibberish, 25 AFTER THE REACTION being put to bed by the knife-boy and the cook. On the other is the inward grandeur, Death and his armies and majesty visibly present in this suburban villa, and present also the three great Angels, " the Design and the Justice and the Mercy of God." The M'Korio flourishes, Mr. I. Z. Bamett, who is chief promoter, becomes Lord Lambeth. The shares rise. But away in a remote suburb they have buried Emmanuel Burden, Merchant, of Thames Street and Upper Norwood (for whom, one is relieved to hear, Mr. Belloc " has no fears at the Judgment seat ") ; and with him they have buried the older England. This remarkable work in some sense gathers up all the threads of remonstrance into one deliberate im- peachment of the spirit of the Eeaetion ; the fine fruits of that " Imperialism " which ran like a species of fluid madness through the veins of England during the late disastrous years. Memorable in itself, it is more memorable as a kind of pioneer of the revolt which is essaying a return to sanity, and the broken tradition of reform. The rise of Mr. Chesterton in the public estimate has exhibited the most sudden growth of all recent repu- tations. While still on the right side of thirty, he leapt into a position of which older men might well be envious. His early work, "Greybeards at Play," a volume of fantastic verse, " The Wild Knight," serious poetry of remarkable originality and power, "The Defendant," a collection of paradoxical essays, revealed only to the few the presence of a new writer and a new method. His life of "Browning," however, both in its merit and its definite challenge, evoked a universal testimony that here was something 26 AFTER THE REACTION which, whether you liked it or not, was henceforth to be reckoned with in literature. Since then have followed "Twelve Types," and "Watts," and a novel, once again of daring originality, " The Napoleon of Netting Hill " — a parable of the perpetual survival of the spirit of patriotism, however mystical and irrational, against all the forces of ridicule and common sense. The output continues of an astonishing fertility in daily and weekly and monthly magazines. It is these outpour- ings of himself, stripped of all reticence, which have earned for Mr. Chesterton the bulk of his fame. He loves the very breath of controversy. Open any news- paper interested in the things for which he cares : you will have a good chance of finding Mr. Chesterton in the midst of a lively argument against a host of opponents, with a calm confidence in his rightness, an unfailing good temper, a boisterous delight in the shrewd blows given and taken. You will find him simultaneously protesting against Dr. Clifford conducting a campaign against Romanism under the guise of an attack upon the Education Acts ; explaining to Mr. Blatchford and Mr. McCabe the impossibility of Agnosticism, and his envy of their simple belief; or expounding to an audience inarticulate with wrath the necessity of desiring Eussia's success in the war against Japan. Beneath all there is no mere love of paradox or intellectual agility, but a very definite philosophy of life. As the attitude of Mr. Yeats was one of protest, so that of Mr. Chesterton is one of acceptance. The denial of life, the longing of a fatigued age for nothing- ness and the great Void, is to him a fundamental atheism and blasphemy. Not "where there is nothing," but " where there is anything," there " is God." He is a mystic and an optimist, entirely satisfied, as he swaggers 27 AFTER THE REACTION down Fleet Street, that all things are very good. With Whitman he can protest, " No array of terms can express how much at peace I am about God." To many this boisterous content appears as an offence and irreverence. To such he appears of those who are too readily at ease in Zion. To others this revolt from the denials of life has come with something of the nature of an inspiration. He is all for acceptance of the things that are, and the revelation through these of the things that endure. In all experience the present becomes a transfigured past ; to the few only, as to this writer, that transfigura- tion has been immediately accomplished. He has no controversy with the results of modern progress, the city, in slum or suburb. As wild and flaming meanings call to him from beneath that dull surface as any appeal in ancient forest or the voices of the mountains and the sea. The great city he finds as something "wild and obvious." The "casual omnibus" wears "the primal colours of a fairy ship." The lights in the dark " begin to glow like innumerable goblin eyes." Bermondsey is decked with fairy bubbles for gas-lamps and haunted with Presences of good and evil. The door-knockers of Clapham, as he gazes at them, writhe into strange shapes, the fat, red, polished pillar-boxes shout their mystical meaning to the skies. Hardly a hair's breadth below the cellars of Kensington flare the ancient elemental fires. He is intoxicated by the " towering and tropical visions of things as they are," the " gigantic daisies, the heaven -consuming dandelions, the gi-eat Odyssey of strange-coloured oceans and strange-shaped trees, of dust like the wreck of temples, and thistledown like the ruin of stars." Day by day the seeing eye beholds God renewing his ancient rapture. The wild Knight in his 28 AFTER THE REACTION quest, hearing "the crumhling creeds, like cliffs washed down by water, change and pass," finds " all these things as nothing"; confident that the turn of the road will reveal the goal of all his wandering. " So with the wan waste grasses on my spear, I ride for ever seeking aiter God. My hair grows whiter than my thistle plume. And all my limbs are loose; but in my eyes The star of an unconquerable praise ; For in my soul one hope for ever sings. That at the next white corner of a road My eyes may look on Him." To one inspired by such visions all the spirit of the Reaction is summed up in the tremendous picture of Watts's "Mammon." The vision is not Mammon or Commerce, but " something intangible behind," a ruling element in modem life. Here is " the blind and asinine appetite for mere power " ; symbolised in " the all- destroying God and king adorned with the ears of an ass, declaring that he was royal, imperial, irresistible, and, when all is said, imbecile." " This is something which in spirit and in essence I have seen before," he proclaims, " something which in spirit and in essence I have seen everywhere. That bloated, unconscious face, so heavy, so violent, so wicked, so innocent, have I not seen it at street comers, in billiard rooms, in saloon bars, laying down the law about Chartered shares, or gaping at jokes about women ? Those huge and smashing limbs, so weighty, so silly, so powerless, and yet so powerful, have I not seen them in the pompous movements, the morbid health of the prosperous in the great cities? The hard, straight pillars of that throne, have I not seea 29 AFTER THE REACTION them in the hard, straight, hideous tiers of modern warehouses and factories? That tawny and sulky smoke, have I not seen it going up to heaven from all the cities of the coming world ? This is no trifling with argosies and Greek drapery. This is commerce. This is the home of the god himself. This is why men hate him, and why men fear him, and why men endure him." Let all who are satisfied with the courses of modern England during the past decade consider if there be not at the last some warning of judgment in this verdict upon an evil thing. What is there common, it may be asked, to these different writers, what spirit which may form the key to the movement of the immediate years to come? There is much evidently divergent ; a continuous transi- tion indeed from the complete denials of Mr. Yeats to the complete assertions of Mr. Chesterton. But in all may he traced one element ; the assertion of a passionate Nationalism against both the cosmopolitan ideals of the Victorian period at its beginning and the Imperial ideals at its close. In the vision of the earlier age all national differences were to smooth themselves out by the advance of knowledge and reasonableness. Common sense, com- merce, a universal peace were to create a homogeneous civilisation, secure in comfort and tranquillity and a vague, undogmatic religion. In the preaching of this ideal, undoubtedly some of its advocates came perilously near the abnegation of any special national affection, any particular pride in, or devotion to, their land ; and gave a handle to the dreary chatter of a Press which branded them as the friends of every country but their own. Against this came the reaction. Imperialism asserted, indeed, the devotion of the individual to his 30 AFTER THE REACTION own land; but crudely denied the right to others of a similar affection. It was convinced in pathetically sanguine fashion of the Divine mission of England to elevate each separate and subject race to the level of Mayfair or Brixton. So the Irish, the Dutch of South Africa, the natives of India, or of Nyassa (" half devil and half child ") for their own good were to be educated out of their own ways into English ways. They would be placed under the cold justice of the Imperial rule. They would be taught to forget their own lan- guage and deny their own religions and ancient pieties. They would learn to ascend the steep path of labour and virtue which would eventually turn them into some replica of that finished product of the universe, the Imperial Briton. Such was the ideal at its best. At its worst it became a crude assertion of dominance, with a contempt as much for the old England which had not apprehended these Imperial ideals as for the foreigner who still obstinately resisted their sway. Against both these movements is now being set a Nationalism which, on the one hand, passionately asserts a mystical and entire devotion to its own land ; on the other, a respect for the devotion of others. It brands the murder of a nation as a sin alike against man and God. One catches a note even of laughter in the defiant scorn with which the newer spirit confronts those who identify their own calamitous methods with the welfare of their country, and would brand all others as traitors. It is in the name of England, as Englishmen concerned primarily with the honour of their own land, as those to whom the very fields and flowers, and the breath of the particular soil speaks with an unchanging appeal, that these writers 31 AFTER THE REACTION fling back the charges of disloyalty, made by those who have never been able to understand the meaning of the mystery of Patriotism. This is common to all. Mr. Yeats is at the heart of that National revival in life and literature which, in the past few years, has made Ireland, on the remote boun- daries of Europe, the centre of one of the few living and compelling movements of the age. All his devotion gathers towards the preservation of this individual spirit, the spirit " at the heart of the Celt in the moments he has grown to love through years of per- secution, when, cushioning himself about with dreams and hearing fairy-songs in the twilight, he ponders on the soul and on the dead." Mr. Watson laughs openly at " that odious charge of inconstancy to my beloved and worshipped mother- land." " To one conscious of these noble origins, conscious, too, of having loved his country with the vigilant love that cannot brook a shadow upon her honour, the charge of being against her because he deplores her temporary attitude and action, brings a kind of amazement that has in it something akin to despair." Mr. NevinsOn has devoted his days to appeals for the struggle of martyred nations to maintain their own life, — in Ireland, in Macedonia, in South Africa. But all his affection centres upon the very soil of his own homeland. " The seas gulf and fall around her promontories," is his testimony, " or lie brooding there in green and purple lines. Her mountains are low, like blue waves they run along the horizon, and the wind flows over them. It is a country of deep pasture and quiet downs and earthy fields, whore the furrows run straight from hedge to 32 AFTER THE REACTION hedge. There is moorland too, and lakes with wild names, and every village is full of ancient story. The houses are clustered round old castle walls, and across the breezy distance of fen and common the gi-ey cathe- drals rise like ships in full sail." Mr. Belloc is perhaps the most entirely Nationalist. He is all for the smaller community against the larger. He sings the praise of the South country whose " great hills stand along the sea," and of the men of the South country against the remoter regions of England. When he drinks the home-brewed ale he drinks (in his own absurd and happy phrase) " Nelson and all the Vic- tories." He will even protest in great language patriotism for a Europe encompassed with alien forces, a world outside which can never understand devotions beaten into her soil by the passion of a thousand years ; — " She will certainly remain. " Her component peoples have merged and have re- merged. Her particular, famous cities have fallen down. Her soldiers have believed the world to have lost all, because a battle turned against them. Her best has at times grown poor and her worst rich. Her colonies have seemed dangerous for a moment from the insolence of their power, and then again (for a moment) from the contamination of their decline. She has suffered in- vasion of every sort; the East has wounded her in arms and corrupted her with ideas ; her vigorous blood has healed the wounds at once, and her permanent sanity has turned such corruptions into innocuous follies. She will certainly remain." And Mr. Chesterton has made himself the very apostle of a new Nationalism which proclaims this variegated development as an essential for the preser- 33 V AFTER THE REACTION vation of the sanity of the world. " There is a spirit ahroad among the nations of the earth," he cries, " which drives men incessantly on to destroy what they cannot understand, and to capture what they cannot enjoy." This is the spirit which all these men find in the faction which has heen dominant in politics and literature. Its final and desperate rally is now gather- ing in the forces enlisting with Mr. Chamherlain, under the appeal both to cupidity and Imperial dominance, in a last effort to maintain a departing supremacy. And this is the spirit against which the new movement has declared uncompromising war. If literature be any guide, therefore, one can prophesy certain notes of the spirit of the coming time. First, this spirit will be National; with no appearance of balanced affection and an equal approval and sympathy for all men, a universal benevolence. It will proclaim always a particular concern in the well-being of England and the English people ; a pride in its ancient history, its ancient traditions, the very language of its grey skies and rocky shore; Second, it will, I think, dissever itself entirely from those former rallies of a national spirit which have immediately identified a nation with a small and limited class, throwing up boundaries round its privileges against a hungry and raging crowd. There will be none of the follies of the " young England," or attempts to revive a feudalism which had vigour in its day, but now has ceased to be. The assertion will be of a spiritual democracy, with a claim for every Englishman and woman and child to some share in the great in- heritance which England has won. And third, therefore, you will note a bedrock demand 34 AFTER THE REACTION in the thrusting forward of those problems of social discontent and social reform, which are destined ultimately to brash aside the futilities of the present party strife. Agaiust those who protest their devotion to their country, but who have done nothing to make that country more desirable for the masses of its millions, and more secure in the devotion of free and satisfied peoples, wiU be set up a determination at all costs and through all changes to create an England more worthy of the land of our desire. The repatriation of a rural population with free men strong in the tenacity which only security and contact with the land can give, the grappling with the problems of om* restless cities, the more even spread of the national wealth, the wider distribution of the good things which have flowed so plentifully into our store, the assertion of a minimum standard of life for each citizen of such a land — these are the things which will become more and more insistent through the spirit that is arising after the Reaction. No gleam of such radiant visions penetrates through the dusty atmosphere of contemporary politics. The observer, limited to so dreary an outlook, might well claim exoneration for despair of his country. Govern- ment and Parliament are to-day seen mouthing and mumbling over dead things with a kind of pompous futility which would be ridiculous if it were not so entirely tragical. Such verses as those of Shelley in 1819 seem alone adequate to the present ; with their vision of a "Senate" with "Time's worst statute unrepealed"; religion as " a closed book " ; " rulers who neither see nor feel nor know." But now, as then, there can be hope of the presence 35 AFTER THE REACTION also within these graves of that "glorious Phantom' which may " burst to illumine our tempestuous day." And those who have been watching all the long night for the signs of its passing can even now see the dark- ness lightened with the coming of the dawn. 36 DE MORTUIS " lis ont aussi pasie sur cette f/erre, its ont descendu lefleuve du temps : on entendit leurs voix sur ses hords, et puis on n'entendit phis rien. . , , " II y en avadt qui discdent : Qu'est-ce que ces flats qui nous emportent ? Y a-t-il quelque chose apres ce voyage rapide ? Nous ne le savons pas, nul ne le sait. Et comme ils disaient cela, les rives s'evanouissaient. . . . "11 y en avait aussi qui semblaient dans un recueillement profond icouter une parore secrete, et puis I'ceil fixe sur le couchant, tout a coup ils cjiantaient une aurore invisible et tm. jour qui ne finit ja/mcuis. , . . "Ousont-ils? Qui nou^ le dira? Heureux les morts qui meurent dans le Seigneur." — Lambnnais. WILLIAM EBNEST HENLEY You can count on the fingers of one hand the original and formative minds in English letters; and there is one fewer to-day than yesterday. The advent of W. E. Henley marked the coming of a new spirit. His career coincided with its riotous supremacy. It was dead before he died. Its followers gathered round him as disciples round a master. It found expression in the short-lived journals which he edited so brilliantly. It stamped its seal upon a whole generation of young authors who became infected with its scorns and its devotions, and spread its faith through the English- speaking world. For the first time since the days of " Young England," literature was whole-heartedly on the side of the reaction. Barbarism and the joy of existence was one side of it, with a craving for the sharp and bitter rind of life. Imperialism and love of adventure was another — the assertion of the right of the strong man to rule, to trample on the weak, to crush under and destroy for his pleasure. These were com- bined with the hunger for the raw and primitive and elemental ; the sloughing off of an ancient civilisation, the calling up of the beast and the savage to arise firom their long sleep. No body of blameless citizens ever wallowed in blood so fearfully as Henley's young men. No man ever hated any cause more untiringly than 39 DE MORTUIS Henley hated all that is meant by modern Liberalism. Democracy and the rule of the many ; the protection of the weak against the strong and the poor against the powerful ; the decencies and respectabilities of ordered life; the sentiment which dislikes pain and shrinks from the brutalities of war ; all attempts to find a sanctity in the rights of the common people, the cry of the oppressed — these causes were involved in one universal condemnation. It was a spirit and a cult not without pose and affectation. But it was alive, fervent, consuming while it lasted much dead refuse. We who are emerging from its tyranny to the saner realities need not grudge an acknowledgment of the strength of the thundercloud and the fiery splendour of the storm. What a feast of good things was represented by the old National Observer ! For a Saturday's sixpence one could obtain the first work of a dozen original and daring minds. There would be ferocious political leaders, sarcastic, bitter, striking to kill. These might be followed by a poem from an unknown author, just becoming talked about, a Mr, Kudyard Kipling. For " Middles " you might read one of that series of "Modern Men," the most incisive and dramatic character sketches in modern journalism; or one of Henley's appreciations, as whole-hearted as his hatreds ; or Mr. Kenneth Graham's " Golden Age " tales ; or Mr. Marriott Watson's sketches (he has never done better work) ; or, perhaps, the table-talk of Mr. Street's inimitable "boy," or Mr. Harold Frederic's Uncle. And in the reviews you would find something equally unexpected, a distinctive note behind the summary of contents, a sifting and judgment of ephemeral literature by the light of the fixed stars of 40 WILLIAM ERNEST HENLEY criticism. Financially, it was a failure. The clever- ness and originality were too naked and unashamed. Men reeled hack into the sobriety of The Spectator and similar safe periodicals. But for the few of that age who had received the great gift of youth all this noise and sparkle and glitter represented an adventure into faii-yland. And the man who was at the centre of it all, the heart of this exuberant and boisterous activity, was the man who has died after a life of pain. The figure sug- gested was of a great laughing giant, full of the open air and physical well-being and personal response to the zest of the battle of existence. The reality was a tortured body, the experience of enormous suffering, life creeping ever on broken wing in a maimed and restless discomfort. With his life-long friend, Stevenson, he has gone down singing into the darkness. History vrill see these two optimists always in a clear white light of afternoon. WhUe stout burgesses with ample means wept or squeaked over the miseries of existence and demonstrated their dolors to an admiring world, these two great sufferers from their beds of pain were pro- claiming the triumph of things. Coughing his life out in his darkened room, Stevenson sang carols in praise of Grod; so insistent that the innocent like Mr. Archer could reproach him for his too complacent exulta- tion, and praise of this " brave gymnasium." In hos- pital, stricken by poverty and perpetual pain, with nerves on the rack and the things he loved for ever beyond his grasp, Henley responded with thanks for his " unconquerable soul." Undoubtedly, when all transi- tory disputes have vanished, the world will deem itself the richer for so bracing an example. More even than in most men of genius the child 41 DE MORTUIS survived in Henley. As a child he was wayward, capricious, vain; never reconciled to the limitations of life ; difficult to satisfy. He had all the child's passionate loves and hatreds, the sudden transitions of temper, the almost fierce affection ; with the occasional inexplicable impulses to injure those he loved. The attack on Stevenson, which caused the scandal of a day, was but an example. It was one of the great friendships of history with depth and intimacy not yet fully re- vealed. The lines to Baxter — "How good it sounds, Lewis and you and I"- — the dedications of "A child curious and innocent," and " Time and Change," the collaborated plays, show one side ; the figure of Burly in Stevenson's " Talk and Talkers," the unforgettable tribute at the end of the Christmas Sermon, the other. But he saw a lay figure set up for worship. He struck fiercely and blindly : at the figure and his dead friend. The world was scandalised and delighted. " Lewis " would have understood. It is for the child elements that he wUl stand in literature. He possessed a child's quick apprehension of the sensuous aspect of things — the dying year and the coming of spring, night and the sea in storm, and all the magical world of out-of-doors. He loved with a child's delight the pageantry of war, the sword's " high, irresistible" song, the bright flash of steel, and the tramp of armed men. He had a childlike, unreserved love of England, expressing in a few magnificent ballads the mystery and sacredness of a Patriotism rare in these latter days. And in the most appealing and universal of all his poems, it is the child shrinking from the Unknown and the Future : the child that has suffered so much wistfully asking the meaning of it all : the simple, pitiful note of fear and surprise at 42 WILLIAM ERNEST HENLEY "The terror of Time and Change and Death That wastes the floating, transitory world." There is little spontaneity in these songs. The experiments in rhymeless metre are not altogether successful. Even in the voice of triumph and exulta- tion there is always the background of doubt and menace. The chill of the coming cold is in the songs of Summer: "in the sun, among the leaves, upon the flowers," creeps the shadow of the approach of Death. For all the indomitable spirit, the proclamation that life is worth living, and the refusal to whine and whimper, it is the sombre side of life which Henley paints in his poems. The Hospital Ehymes are mere jagged cries of agony. " Into the night go one and all," " fatuous, ineffectual yesterdays," " the menace of the irreclaim- able sea " — of such stuff are his verses woven. Perhaps they wiU be remembered in the future more for their occasional magnificence of phrase than for any natural inevitableness and charm. " The past's enormous disarray " ; " the unanswering generations of the dead " ; " the immortal, ineommunicable dream " ; " the high austere, nnpitying grave " ; " night with her train of stars, And her great gift of sleep" — these are as elemental and memorable as the great summaries of Whitman. His is the poetry read by poets, the quarry from which others will mine the marble and fashion it into a thing of beauty. As a great spirit unbreakable by time and fate, Henley will go down to the future. To this man were given many of the world's good things, varied interests, a power of passionate appreciation of the best in literature and common life, high and generous friend- ships, love which was the inspiration of all the most 43 DE MORTUIS triumphant of his songs. To him also were given failure and pain : a perpetual ill-success in every enter- prise : such suffering of body and spirit as seemed to make him the sport of mischievous powers. All his literary schemes collapsed : he lacked money and the little satisfactions of a sheltered and tranquil existence. The craving for a life of action perpetually fretted him, the " home sickness " of " those detained at home un- willingly." He had one child whom he adored. She was torn from him ; and in one poem which sounds the uttermost depth of tears he pictures " the little exquisite Ghost " calling back across the grave to her Father and Mother in those home kingdoms left desolate by Death. Sometimes he was irritable and indignant, and struck at the friends who loved him. But for the most part there was a resignation, a determination to make the best of things, a resolute refusal to give up and acknowledge the triumph of the powers of darkness, which lifts the whole tragic record out of the region of sorrow, and transfigures it with a kind of glory. "So be my passing I My task accomplished and the long day done, My wages taken, and in my heart Some late lark singing. Let me be gathered to the quiet west, The sundown splendid and serene. Death." The spirit of one of the most appealing of his earliei poems is the spirit in which most who knew and loved him will wish to bid him farewell. U J. HENBY 8H0BTH0U8E TWO writers are most responsible for whatever popular success has been attained by the move- ment termed a little grandiloquently "the Anglo- Catholic revival in England." The one, Christina Eossetti, wrote a few poems ; the other, J. Henry Shorthouse, one novel. A woman and a layman of the middle classes thus strangely provided the par- ticular atmosphere of mysticism and aspiration which softened the often hard, dogmatic teaching and the fantastic ritual of the younger clergy. The enormous popularity of " John Inglesant," described upon its first appearance as " having taken the world by storm " and enduring until to-day, is a little difficult fully to explain. It is written in a rare and delicate prose, revealing a rare and refined personality ; but this, if anything, would militate against a wide acceptance. It advertises itself as a " Eomance," but readers anticipating " Tushery " of the familiar type are dismayed by an immediate plunge into Platonic discussions upon the nature of the soul. It possesses little sense of unity, and violates every law that should govern the successful novel. Yet it has never ceased to attract a varied array of champions. Its reception, indeed, is largely a matter of temperament. Mr. Birrell, with all his eclectic taste, bas confessed that he cannot away with it. And many 45 DE MORTUIS others less candid have probably in silence endorsed this condemnation. The secret of this acceptance lies, I think, in an appeal to a type, widely spread, desirous of accepting a certain view of life. The world of Shorthouse in all his novels is a world viewed under a particular aspect. Existence is pictured as a perplexing and disturbed dream. Guidance is doubtful. The good is often at cross purposes with the good. Human life assumes the aspect now of a brilliant phantasia, now of a masquerade. The later renaissance in Italy, as shown in these pages, is progressing in an intoxicating atmosphere and under a vague sense of oppression. Men and women move through an en- chanted landscape charged with emotion. It is a vision above all of sudden transitions, of the irony of Change and Death everywhere crashing in upon the players. The transition is immediate from masques and revelry and unbridled license to the "Memento, homo, quia pulvis es," in which the lights suddenly wax dim and all the music changes into terror and tears. Through this strange pageant — the strange pageant of life in all time viewed from the towers of Eternity — John Inglesant " walked often as in a dream." But the appeal which caught the imagination of men living in an equally perplexing age rests in the conviction of the author that there is a clue to the mystery. As was said of Dante, "he believed, and in spite of all aflirmed the high harmony of the world." This he was enabled to do by his spiritual interpreta- tion both of the inward voice and the outward pageant of things. In the latter he definitely accepted the sacramental view of Nature. We are back in the Middle Age. "All redness becomes blood, all water 46 J. HENRY SHORTHOUSE tears." The natural is but the thin yeil of the super- natural, for ever almost bursting through. God is visibly acting in His world ; the most trivial events are charged vrith a spiritual significance. Other Presences are watching the little decisions of the little life of man. This view tolerates immediately, and without any sense of disturbance, the incursions into the story of mystery and miracle, the appearance of the ghost of Strafford, or the crystal vision of the death of Eustace. It is an attitude towards things which finds a satisfaction in the dramatic symbolism of an external ceremony, in music and light and ritual, which to the ordinary man may be but irritating. Others have shared the discovery of John Inglesant, in that most touching description of his visit to little Gidding, that "the gracious figure over the altar and the bowed and kneeling figures," are essentially con- gruous with "the misty autumn sunlight and the driving autumn rain." And the other clue to life's mazes Mr. Shorthouse found in that doctrine of the Inner Light which he received with his Quaker upbringing, and unfolded with so winning an appeal. The Platonic doctrine of the Divine guidance, of the direct call of God within the soul of man, is the belief which leads John Inglesant through the confused and troublous life of the seven- teenth century. It is heard in the three great crises of the book, to which all the lesser events lead, but which, when they come, come suddenly. The first is the temp- tation of the world, when De Cressy, the Benedictine, at Paris, offers him the more excellent way. The second is the temptation of the flesh, in the damp mists and breathless air in the flight with Laurette from Florence to Pistoia. The third is the temptation of the devil, in 47 DE MORTUIS that most wonderful scene in the mountains of Umbria, when John Inglesant lays his sword on the altar of the little hillside chapel, and delivers his brother's murderer to the judgment of Grod. Through these and all other incidents of this play of tired children, amid the troublous clash of war, in strange ways, with love and loss, to the final serene sadness of old age, he has ever the apprehension of this unseen hand. The pro- mise was to his eager boyhood. " I think you may find this doctrine," said his teacher, " a light which will guide your feet in dark places ; and it would seem that this habit of mind is very likely to lead to the blessed- ness of the beatific vision of God." That promise survived through all the vanity and terror of existence tost amid the whirlpools of divergent spiritual tides. And after it is all over he can assert with the confidence of a direct experience that " we may not only know the truth, but we may live even in this life in the very household and com-ts of God." Shorthouse only wrote one book. For twenty years he put into these pages all his philosophy of existence. He had said his say, and there was nothing more to be said. Like Olive Schreiner, an author with whom, despite superficial incongruities, he has much in com- mon, he revealed his heart's secret in one supreme emotional utterance. Pressed by his friends, he did indeed essay further efforts. In the tranquil life of the little German Court of the eighteenth century, he could almost retain the atmosphere of large issues and spiritual meanings, and in consequence the story of little Mark nearly approaches success. But in the comfortable exis- tence of nineteenth-century England, grave and sane and v?ithout fear, in the life of the ordered city concerned with sanitation and the Poor Law, the particular 48 J. HENRY SHORTHOUSE spiritual ardour which he loved to portray appears forced and artificial. So Lady Falaise failed, and Sir Percival, his hero warrior, modelled after Gordon's pattern, whose actual description perhaps almost justified Barry Pain's cruel parody of the conversation under the Tulip Tree. The writer who has most nearly approached the spirit and success of Shorthouse's hero in the modern world is John Oliver Hobbes in her " Robert Orange." The record of the fashioning in Vanity Fair through great bitterness in the School for Saints of a Weapon keen and pliant to the will of God, is a record of one moving amongst the phantom society of the nineteenth century, as Inglesant moved through the phantom courts of Italy three hundred years ago. But the book most revealing the same inner spirit, with something of the delicacy and charm of style, is the " Eoad Mender," the work of an author also indebted to a Quaker upbringing for keen insight into the things of the spirit, and a capacity for the estimating, at true value, of the Temporal and the Eternal. The style of Shorthouse at its best stands almost without rival in the literature of the past twenty years for a particular refinement and delicacy. The inevitable comparison is with Newman : not that " John Inglesant " achieves even a momentary rivahy with that supreme perfection of English prose, but that in each case there is an altogether personal secret and appeal which defies analysis. Passage after passage reads like music. Who is ever likely to forget the concluding scene of this great spiritual record : the sunset over the city : and after the storm, in the quiet air of England, far fi:om the confused and passionate life of Italy, John Inglesant's farewell? " We are like children, or men in a tennis-court, and 49 E DE MORTUIS before our conquest is half won the dim twilight comes and stops the game ; nevertheless, let us keep our places, and, above all things, hold fast by the law of life we feel within. Let us follow in His steps, and we shall attain to the ideal life ; and, without waiting for our 'mortal passage,' tread the free and spacious streets of that Jerusalem which is above. " He spoke more to himself than to me. The sun, which was just setting behind the distant hills, shone with dazzling splendour for a moment upon the towers and spires of the city across the placid water. Behind this fair vision were dark rain-clouds, before which gloomy background it stood in fairy radiance and light. For a moment it seemed a glorious city, bathed in life and hope, full of happy people who thronged its streets and bridge, and the margin of its gentle stream. But it was ' breve gaudium.' Then the sunset faded, and the ethereal vision vanished and the landscape lay dark and chill. " ' The sun is set,' Mr. Inglesant said cheerfully, ' but it will rise again. Let us go home.' " Only to those secure in such a serenity, amid all the terror of passing things, can come, in the splendour of sunset, so tranquil an acceptance of the ending of the day. 50 HENB7 8IDGWICE " r I iHE year 1851," was said when Turner died, _1_ " will in the future be remembered less for what it has displayed than for what it has withdrawn." The same prophecy may surely be made of the year which took from us, scarcely noticed amid the clamour of disastrous war, John Ruskin and Henry Sidgwick. Each was in many respects typical of the University he served so well. Euskin was a child of Oxford. Eloquent, famous, dogmatic, no worshipper of con- sistency, he lived before the world, taking all men into the confidence of his changing opinion. Sidgwick, retired, restrained, almost unknown to the crowd, advanced with cautious steps, weighing each sentence before giving it utterance, putting his life-force into work for his University. The one attracted crowded audiences to his lectures, which were subsequently read wherever the English language was spoken. The other at Cambridge addressed twelve or twenty students, and only appealed in his writings to a few serious minds. The death of the one, even in the most perilous period of the war, was marked by the lamentation of the multi- tude. The death of the other passed almost unnoticed by the Press and the busy world. Future ages, I think, will find a dif&culty in deciding to which of these two thinkers the world owes the profounder debt of gratitude, 51 DE MORTUIS Clarity of thought and unwavering fairness towards opponents are characteristic of Sidgwick's philosophical writings. Only once did he appear to approach the limits of legitimate criticism : in his half-contemptuous dismissal of Herbert Spencer's philosophy as a serious advance in the progress of thought. For the rest his expositions of other men's systems were astonishingly clear and generous. He sometimes humorously com- plained that he had never been able to found a school at Cambridge : that no body of students acknowledged him as their master. How could he found a school of followers, who so temptingly placed before us the claims of so many different philosophies : who would expound another's creed with the same enthusiasm as his own ? The school he founded was a school of those who attained divergent positions, but who all acknowledged the lessons learnt from him: — fairness to opponents, ardent search for enlightenment, devotion to truth wherever it might lead them. He had resigned his fellowship in early life as incom- patible with his beliefs. He never faltered in his con- viction of the impossibility of the old tests and articles. Yet all must have noted in his controversy with Dr. Rashdall on the limits of religious conformity, how anxious he was not to draw these limits tightly round others. He would allow for all possibilities before branding any fellow-man as guilty of the moral laxity which with him always ranked amongst the deadly sins. And yet with all this was no mistiness, no vagueness in which all distinction vanishes. The limit may be made as comprehensive as possible. But it is drawn at the last with no faltering hand. Beyond this line, as he can see it, there is a region to which no man may go without peril to his soul. 52 HENRY SIDGWICK His "Ethics" is his greatest work. As a moralist he will first be remembered. They are right who say that he possessed a mind essentially analytical. They are wrong who assert that he confined himself to criti- cism and presented no constructive system. He broke up the old Utilitarianism, with its illogical confasion of the claims of self and others. He attempted to resolve all the social duties into the primary virtue of benevolence. And he acknowledged that the impulse to seek the happiness of others owns its origin to an intuition which no purely human outlook can justify or explain. So in his famous concluding chapter he protested the insuf- ficiency of all the popular naturalistic systems, and the inadequacy of the moral sanction without the postulates of God and Immortality. His work was greater than his writing. The University of Cambridge in its present constitution is largely his creation. For twenty years he was the acknowledged leader of the party of reform which effected the transition from the old age to the new. All through the struggle he was working for the expan- sion of the University beyond its ancient limitations, for the increasing of its capacity of national service. In the efforts for the abolition of sinecures, the abandon- ment of theological tests, the growth of the University beyond the limits of the Colleges, above all in the opening of its teaching to women students, he played a prominent part. He lived to see the quiet induc- tion of changes which a former time would have con- templated with forebodings of ruin. Only at the close of his long term of service was the outlook clouded by the reaction inevitable after far^eaching reform. During his later years there came the triumph of a conserva- tism once impotent. All the special movements he had 53 DE MORTUIS advanced were suddenly checked in their progress. The recognition of external students was refused by the rejection of their appeal for the diploma. The struggle for religious liberty was checked by the refusal to sanction St. Edmund's Hostel ior Koman Catholic students. Above all, the long effort for the education of women was disastrously closed by the defeat of the appeal for the titular degree. He could not be indif- ferent to this change in the University he loved so well. He recognised the inevitable, resigned his position on the Council, and withdrew himself from the arena of conflict. Here was no feeling of pique or transitory despondence. But he acknowledged that his own work was done ; that the future belonged to a newer generation, inspired by different ideals. So he noted a similar change in the wider questions of his time. He had thrown himself with ardour into the struggle for religious liberty which ennobled the middle years of the century. " Absorbed," he described the company to which he belonged, " in struggling for freedom of thought in the trammels of an historical religion." He had lived to see the triumph of his cause. Now a new age had dawned and new dangers threatened the health of society. He turned to confront the problems of the newer time. "Freedom is won," he said, "and what does Freedom bring us to? It brings us face to face with atheistic science : the faith in God and Immortality, which we had been struggling to clear from superstition, suddenly seems to be in the air : and in seeking for a firm basis for the fight we find ourselves in the midst of the ' fight with death.' " The Metaphysical Society of which he had been a member had represented the older struggle : the conflict of widely disordered faiths and denials. It had seen 54 HENRY SIDGWICK the triumph of its aims — the practical toleration of all forms of belief and negation. Now the time for re- construction had come the survivors should gather together after the great conflict. So the newer Syn- thetic Society was formed: endeavouring to unite all those to whom the word " God " bore some intelligible meaning. He himself had laid down the first principles of union in his admirable clear essays. And in all the further work of reconstruction it is difficult to over-esti- mate the loss of his penetrating criticism, unflinching expression of truth, and eager search for faith adequate to save mankind &om advancing indifl'erence and decay. His active work for the Psychical Eesearch Society was but an application of the principle which guided all his progress. Here was no credulous search after a spirit of divination, or hunger for marvels in an age staled by custom. But he was ever the seeker for all knowledge which could throw light upon the things of life. He advanced as readily along new and unpopular paths as on the beaten tracks of progress. He ever waged unceasing war against the spirit of condemnation without judgment, of rejection of evidence because undesired, whether manifested in the older theology or the newer sciences. So he gave his great name and critical powers to the study of the mysterious phenomena of the border world. He was once the dupe of clever schemers, and often the subject of the mockery of the Press. But he continued to support the work until the end. The evidence con- vinced him of the presence of dim, undefined forces, of something operating in the world of human con- sciousness which the ordinary man had failed to recognise and science had hitherto ignored : and he 65 DE MORTUIS was deteraained in the necessity for the continuance of the study and the wresting of the control of obscure mental phenomena from the hands of the quack and the charlatan. But it failed to yield him, as it seemed to yield to some, clear and indubitable proof of the life beyond death. Neither here nor in any past time could he find satisfactory evidence of the penetration of the inscrutable secret of the grave. The philosophical proofs of Theism he was unable to accept as satisfactory. " The more sceptical atti- tude," he said, " has remained mine through life." But he was convinced that belief in God and in Im- mortality are vital to human well-being. " Humanity" — this was his unshakable conviction — " humanity will not and cannot acquiesce in a godless world." He was eager to recognise the complete relativity of our knowledge: the vast sea of ignorance that surrounds us. One of his favourite theses rested on the possibility of another great religious inspiration. He could hope for the return of a period of unclouded faith after the age of disintegration had passed away. He re-echoes the famous lines of his friend, which he says he " could never read without tears " : the pro- test of the heart against the " freezing reason " and the sound of "an ever-breaking shore that tumbles in the godless deep " : the spirit that feels as " a child that cries but crying knows his Father near." Wir heissen euch hoffen — the sad yet not entirely mournful refuge of so many of the great men of his time — was his final message. " The revealing visions come and go : when they come we feel that we know : but in the intervals we must pass through states in which all is dark, and in which we can only struggle to hold the conviction that— 56 HENRY SIDGWICK " Power is with us in the night Which made the darkness and the light And dwells not in the light alone." Beyond the work, greater far than the creed, was the personality of the teacher we knew and loved. To the younger of us at Cambridge, seeing in him a figure who had "drunk delight of battle with his peers " in the controversies of the age, he seemed indeed the " Man of Wisdom " of the Greek dreamer ; the philosopher whom the people, were they not blind, would drag forth and crown king. To us he stood for " philosophy " at its highest. Here was the spirit which showed the power of the student of all time and all existence. We noted in him the capacity for weighing evidence, the detached judgment, the multi- farious interests in all the thought and progress of the world. His lectures were attended by a scanty few. Men complained that they were of little utility for the schools. In metaphysic he would spend the course of a term in defining the words used and laying down the first principles. The more impatient fled away. In ethic he would trace the course of his own spiritual development : from the Utilitarianism of Mill through the influence of Butler: a progress always directed to one end through the troubled waters of controversy. To those pursuing a difficult voyage through the same unquiet sea, the lectures proved unique and fascinating. When we came to know him personally, our respect and admiration deepened. His hospitality at Newnham was long to be remem- bered. Without the asceticism he repudiated or the luxury he deplored in the newer generation, he proved a host to whom we would readily have given all our evenings. He was a brilliant talker, and we would 67 DE MORTUIS gladly have listened to him in silence. This he would never allow. He would draw out the retiring, tolerate the absurd, welcome even the dull and commonplace. Our most fatuous remarks would be accepted and discussed. We left feeling that we were worth more than we had thought before: humbled indeed by comparison with an almost impossible standard of attainment : but saved from utter self-distrust by the recognition that even to the mediocre and ignorant there was the possibility of an occasional inspiration. Nor wUl his assistance be forgotten in deeper matters. More and more his advice was sought on questions of perplexity and honour. It came to be accepted that any course meeting with the approval of his high ideal of life could be pursued with clear conscience. Those alone who were accustomed to turn to him in the difficult problems of practical life could adequately understand the dreary, almost incredible blank created by the knowledge of his death. The end was worthy of the life. A paper read before the Synthetic Society marked the beginning of the end. " Everybody was struck by the power of the paper," wrote one who was present, "but they were even more impressed by the animation and brilliance with which the reader took part in the subsequent debate. A few days later his hearers learnt that their guest had gone through the evening with the prospect of almost immi- nent death before him." The command had suddenly come to set his house in order. He prepared for death by a rapid and terrible disease as one going on a journey. One after the other he detached himself from the multifarious accumulated interests of a busy life. He resigned the professorship to which he had added such distinction, only anxious that the work should be 58 HENRY SIDGWICK carried forward by the most competent hands. He enforced secrecy as to the nature of his illness. He would leave the place in which he had played so high a part without any needless demonstration of ceremony or of pity. He set himself in the last few months of suffering, with no complaining against the inscrutable decree, to await the end : still willing, as far as in him lay, to perform the duties of life, still interested in the activities of the scene he was so soon to leave for ever. Although all knew the end was inevitable and the most speedy was the most kindly, the news came with no ordinary wonder that Henry Sidgwick had joined the "unanswering generations of the dead." His writing represents the philosophy of a transitional time, and may not be destined long to endure. His reputation, always confined to the few, will soon vanish from the memory of man. But the character which shone so brightly through those closing scenes, greater far than his thought or his work, cannot but survive the inexorable years. Wir heissen euch hqffen. We bid you to hope. Is there anything more to say ? 59 FBEDEBIG MYEB8 TOWAEDS the end of Myers's life, inspired by that shining energy which only seemed to increase as the sun dropped to the horizon, the Psychical Research Society initiated an inquiry into the attitude of modern man towards the promise of immortal life. The investigation was, I believe, abandoned in England, where reticence still forbids an eager sincerity about ultimate questions. But it flourished mightily in America, where a new child race will discuss its own spiritual anatomy with all the candour of interested children. I am not sure if the complete results have ever been published. I know some of the replies to the printed questions were of extra- ordinary interest. The inquiry was of belief in immortality and of hope for immortality. The main revelation was of the latter. The attestation of man's belief is irrelevant. Few know what they believe at all. Belief changes from day to day, and in various atmo- spheres, like a guttering flame. Belief over the breakfast- table is something different from belief in time of the soul's upheaval, or confronting the piteous silence of the dead. And in any case belief or disbelief in life beyond the grave can have no effect upon that life's reality or illusion. But hope is more vital. A man is more at home with his desires. And the hope itself may be a 60 FREDERIC MYERS factor in that hope's fruition ; in a universe where, as a matter of experience, each hungry soul receives its heart's desire; life more and fuller for those who demand it, for those who demand it also the sleep of an eternal night. The answers exhibited a large and sincere body of opinion joyfully accepting this second alternative. The note of some was contentment with life well spent, slowly rounding off the long day's work into the tran- quillity of evening. The cry of others was the old cry of startled fear at the unknown. " In that sleep of death what dreams may come " seems to become a question even more haunting with the advance of the years. They feared to take the chance. Visions of a future menace have been intensified by the spectral discoveries of the sciences. The rolling up of the curtain of space and time has revealed a boundless universe of night and terrors, flaring fires of sun and star, an abyss without purpose or plan. The perplexity of Tennyson in old age before the vision of Vastness, the pathetic cry of Spencer as he confronts an unintelligible evolution and dissolu- tion with, beyond, an emptiness or reality all unknown, has bitten deep into the minds of the more serious men of the age. But with most the desire for an end was built neither upon contentment with the present nor fear of an incal- culable future. The proclamation of life-weariness was the dominant assertion. The shrinking was not from life's suffering and confusion, but fi:om life itself. The assertion has come from a civilisation tired alike of so much — and so little — that the effort of hope and change is itself an evil ; in a universe the fit consummation of whose courses will be rest and quietness. Against such acquiescence all the life of this man 61 DE MORTUIS was one passionate protest. He was filled with a fury of aspiration similar to that of Tennyson after life's unending day. Better life in all the circles of the mediasval inferno, both of these life-worshippers as- serted, than life vanishing like the vapour or the candle-flame when the tale is told. The triumph of death was the one unendurable consummation. The acceptance of such a belief, while it lasted, in his own experience emptied the zest from human action, stole all the colours from the flowers. Life under such a domination of greyness became a mere gnawing of dead bones, a mumbling in the darkness ; told by an idiot ; signifying nothing. Myers refused to accept such a negation until some voice which rendered doubt impossible proclaimed the death of man, and no hope in dust. In the midst of an age and civilisation stamped with life-weariness, literature everywhere finding a sombre satisfaction in the end of it all, he appears as a figure from another, more ardent, age. He belongs in spirit to that earlier time when life piled on life appeared all too little for the hungry heart of man ; or to the new outburst of human energies in the birth of modern days, when man flung himself with a kind of heroic fury upon the boundaries of his tiny world. It is in this nursing of the unconquerable hope through an age too much inclined to abandon the quest in despair, that Myers remained as a figure of unfading interest ; far more than in any definite discovery which he thought himself to have made of that hope's vindication. Given life, he was entirely content with anything that life might bring. He never had any fear of the possibilities of evil dreams. He demanded no paradise of jewels and gold. He feared no clumsy or malignant forces. He asked merely " the glory of going on and still to be." 62 FREDERIC MYERS His attitude to the last was one of a large curiosity ; "a little disappointed," he once wrote to me after illness, at not " passing over." It was a re-echo of Kingsley's " Beautiful, kind Death, when will you come and tell me what I want to know? " Something was there of "Whitman's brave spirit as the shadow crept ever nearer over the hills — " The untold want — by life and land ne'er granted Now voyager, sail thou forth to seek and find." The fragment of autobiography, published after his death, so perfect in form, so resonant, to those of us privileged to know its author, of that triumph of certainty which filled all its later years, so tantalisingly brief and broken to some who knew how much he had to say of life's spiritual voyages, exhibited in every line this con- cern in the one absorbing question. Early religion which never gripped the heart yielded immediately to the fascinations of the Hellenic ideal. It was a species of intoxication ; fostering evil as well as good ; aiding in his own words " imaginative impulse and detachment from sordid interests " ; but providing " no check for pride." It rose in a night as a revelation of a world of unfading beauty. It fell in a day with the realisation that nothing remained of it all but ruins and a dream. In a vision, gazing from the summit of Syra on Delos and the Cyclades, and those straits and channels of purple sea, he apprehended that all this was dead and gone for ever. And he turned, " with a passion of regret," from a world which suddenly had crumbled to a little dust. Afterwards, through the influence of Josephine Butler, "Christian conversation came in a potent form." He was introduced by an inner door, " not to its encum- 63 DE MORTUIS bering forms and dogmas, but to its heart of fire." That " heart of fire " breathes through every line of " St. Paul," the one gi-eat Evangelical poem of the century : — " Yea through life, death, thro' sorrow and thro' sinning He shall suf&oe me, for He hath sufficed ; Christ is the end, for Christ was the beginning, Christ the beginning, for the end is Christ." Alas! the vision faded, and the ardour. "I, even I," at first he could write to a friend, "wretched and half- hearted beginner as I am, can almost say already that I know the thing is true." " Gradual disillusion " came from increased knowledge of history and of science, from wider outlook on the world. That Christ, as in the vision of a whole age, now appeared as "dead in that lone Syrian town." The manger is found, filled with mouldy hay ; the rain pours through the broken roof ; the wind moans outside unheeded : — " The ancient stars are tired and dim, And no new star announces Him." " Insensibly the celestial vision faded"; and "left me to 'pale despair and cold tranquillity.'" " It was the hope of the whole world that was vanishing," he wi'ote, "not more alone." The effect of agnosticism upon him was wholly evil. " During this phase only can I remember anything of dreariness and bitterness — of scorn of human life, of anger at destiny, of deliberate preference of the pleasures of the passing hour." An entry in the diary, " H.S. on Ghosts," marked the first line of light on the horizon. The thought came to him of turning the weapons of negation against itself and utilising in the work of rebuilding the very forces 64 FREDERIC MYERS which had destroyed the cloud-capped palaces. Life's continuance should no longer be guaranteed by dreams and visions, wild, unsupported hopes, a prion philosophy, or the shadowy remembrance of things belonging to an ever remoter past. But the evidence of the empirical method itself, the severest tests which reason could desire of manifestations now actually in the world, should certify existence beyond the grave. Science should itself rebuild what science had destroyed. Varied motives drew first together that little band of adventurers who were prepared to explore and to occupy regions of experience, avoided by the common man as poisonous and unclean. With some it was the demand for rescue of such mysterious kingdoms from the dominion of the criminal and the charlatan. With others it was the conviction, an inheritance from the ardour of the Renaissance, that no element in this unintelligible world should be ruled out of investigation. With a third was a faint^ if never entirely articulate, hope that here might be given the very key of the unopened door, which every generation of man had sought to find in vain. Myers, then, as in all his days, made no secret of his motive. It was less to investigate dispassionately with a scientific detachment than with a kind of furious determination to tear from Nature herself the secret she had hidden for so long that he undertook this exploration of the rubbish-heaps of life. He con- fesses his first reluctance to " re-entering by the scullery window the heavenly mansion out of which I had been kicked by the back door." But he wrestled with this mysterious spirit behind the world's outward show, as Jacob wrestled with his mysterious visitant till the break- ing of the day. " ' I will not let thee go until thou bless me ' — so cried I in spirit to that unanswering shade." 65 F DE MORTUIS In that heroic struggle he consumed the remainder of his days. From near the beginning he held himself to have obtained the evidence he desired. That hope sustained him to the end. The results can be studied in innumerable green volumes, The Transactions of the "Psychical Research Society," and in the great work issued after his death, in which he sets out at length the evidence and the theories he had built upon it. It was not an opinion, but a conviction. It transfigured all his later life. I had the privilege of working some slight degree with him in the last years. I shall never forget the eagerness with which he essayed the work of in- vestigation, the welcome to all obscure and remote testimony, the sense almost of awe with which he would announce some fresh fragment of evidence, however grotesque or ridiculous. No devotee of the older religion hunted for souls more eagerly than Myers hunted for news of ghost stories and telepathy and roaming per- sonalities and inexplicable tricks of hypnotism and magic. I remember in sorting evidence with him noting how his spirits would rise as the record of some particular incident would deepen in mystery and horror. It was a lifelong disappointment to him that, although he pursued ghosts with the ardour of the youthful Shelley, the actual vision was never vouchsafed to him. No evidence of fraud deten-ed him. No ridicule in the least affected him. After the detection of deliberate cheating in one notorious " medium " at Cambridge, his companions (perhaps wisely) refused to have any further communication with her. Myers was undeterred He was summoned to fresh seances at Paris ; and I well remember being called to meet him on his return and finding him triumphantly convinced that in this particular case phenomena had occurred beyond the possibilities of human trickery to devise. 66 FREDERIC MYERS The generations of undergraduates who passed so quickly by him regarded all this with perplexity. He was a magnificent lecturer upon literature and much in demand for literary societies. He always charged his discussion of his subject — Swinburne, Morris, and the rest — with the expression of the one hope which burned like a flame at his heart. He would gather small bands of students, attracted somewhat fearfully, to listen to his occult revelations. One meeting especially I recollect, in which, after Myers had told a succession of ever more blood-curdling ghost stories, in the breath- less silence a late arrival suddenly crashed against the door outside. The effect was somewhat similar to the knocking at the gate after the murder of Macbeth, an immediate galvanic shock in the "startled air." His own life and vitality seemed more convincing evidence of immortality than all these testimonies of strange forces. It was impossible to conceive that strong soul passing into nothingness, the triumphant energy meekly bowing before the supremacy of death. His purpose was ever to sail beyond the sunset. Exultation was in all his doing. It is upon a note of exultation he closes his brief testimony of a life given to high causes. Exultation remains in the great line which is carved upon the tablet erected to his memory beyond the walls of Eome, in that most sacred spot of English ground outside the boundaries of Eng- land. Above the tomb where lies all that is mortal of Shelley, stands the self-chosen summary of his life's devotion — ApvvfitvoQ ijvTe ^x^'' ""-^ voarov iraipiav, " Striving to save my own soul, and my comrades homeward way." 67 GEOBGE GISSINa OF all the losses which literature has lately endured, the death of Gissing stands out as most exhibit- ing the ragged edge of tragedy. That Death should come just at the wrong moment was indeed entirely congruous with a life which seemed all through the sport of the gods. The irony of some malign or malicious power seemed to be laid upon the course of this troubled existence. It was almost with a clutch of some frantic laughter — a laughter more desolate than tears — that there came to his friends, at the moment when life at last seemed beginning, the news that life was at an end. One's whole being revolted against such a bitter bludgeoning of fate. Readers of "Mark Eutherford" will remember the restrained but passionate irony of the close. After the unendurable years are over, when life has emerged into afternoon, with a prospect of light at eventide, a few dispassionate sentences tell of a sudden chance chill, a few days' struggle, and then — another of earth's unimportant millions lies quiet for ever. So it was with George Gissing. A long struggle against heavy odds, the experience of the worst, public neglect and private tragedies, had at last given place to something like hopefulness and fame. Recognition, long deserved, had arrived. The crudest of life's cruelties had vanished. A benigner outlook, a 68 GEORGE GISSING softer, kindlier yision of the " farcical melodrama " of man's existence had been apparent in these later months. The words of the last of his books he saw published sound strangely prophetic. "We hoped"-— so he wrote of " Henry Ryecroft " — "we hoped it would all last for many a year ; it seemed, indeed, as though Eyecroft had only need of rest and calm to become a hale man." "It had always been his wish to die suddenly. . . . He lay down upon the sofa in his study, and there — as his calm face declared — passed from slumber into the great silence." This is not the time to tell the details of that troubled life, of the tragedy which lay behind that arduous literary toil and coloured all the outlook with indignation and pain. Some day, for the edification or the warning of the children of the future, the full story will be told. All that it is necessary to know at the present is contained in those books in which the author, under the thin veil of fiction, is pro- testing out of his own heart's bitterness against the existence to which he has been committed. "For twenty years he had liyed by the pen. He was a struggling man beset by poverty and other circum- stances very unpropitious to work." " He did a great deal of mere hack-work : he reviewed, he translated, he wrote articles. There were times, I have no doubt, when bitterness took hold upon him ; not seldom he suffered in health, and probably as much from moral as from physical overstrain." The tyranny of this nineteenth-century Grub Street drove- his genius into a hard and narrow groove. He might have developed into a great critic — witness the promise of his essay on Dickens. There was humour in him all unsuspected by the public till the appearance of " The Town Traveller." 69 DE MORTUIS And a keen eye for natural beauty, and a power of description of the charm and fascination of places, and a passionate love of nature and of home were only made manifest in "By the Ionian Sea," and the last and most kindly volume. All this was sacrificed : in part to a perverted sense of " Mission," the burden, as he thought, laid upon him to proclaim the desolation of modern life : partly to a determination to make manifest to all the world his repugnance and disgust. He remains, and will remain, in literature as the creator of one particular picture. Gissing is the painter, with a cold and mor- dant accuracy, of certain phases of city life, especially of the life of London, in its cheerlessness and bleak- ness and futility, during the years of rejoicing at the end of the nineteenth century. If ever in the future the long promise of the Ages be fulfilled, and life becomes beautiful and passionate once again, it is to his dolorous pictures that men will turn for a vision of the ancient tragedies in a City of Dreadful Night. Gissing rarely if ever described the actual life of the slum. He left to others the natural history of the denizens of " John Street " and the " Jago." The enterprise, variety, and adventurous energy of those who led the existence of the beast would have dis- turbed with a human vitality the pictui-e of his dead world. It was the classes above these enemies of society, in their ambitions and pitiful successes, which he made the subject of his genius. He analyses into its constituent atoms the matrix of which is composed the characteristic city population. With artistic power and detachment he constructs his sombre picture, till a sense of almost physical oppression comes upon the reader, as in some strange and disordered dream, 70 GEORGE GISSING There are but occasional vivid incidents ; the vitriol- throwing in " The Nether World " ; the struggle of the Socialists in " Demos," as if against the ten- tacles of some slimy and unclean monster ; the par- ticular note of revolt sounded in "New Grub Street," when the fog descends not merely upon the multitude who acquiesce, but upon the few who resist. But in general the picture is merely of the changes of time hurrying the individuals through birth, marriage, and death, but leaving the general resultant impression unchanged. Vanitas vanitatum is written large over an existence which has " never known the sun- shine nor the glory that is brighter than the sun." Human life apprehends nothing of its possibilities of sweetness and gentleness and high passion. The energies, rude or tired, flaming into pitiful revolt or accepting from the beginning the lesson of inevitable defeat, end all alike in dust and ashes. The Islington of " Demos," the Camberwell of " The Year of Jubilee," the Lambeth of " Thyrza" : how the whole violent soul of the man revolted against existence set in these ! The outward obsession of the grey labyriath seemed to reflect the spirit of a race of tragic ineptitude. Comfort has been attained, and some security. But beauty has fled from the heart, and the hunger for it passed into a vague discontent. Religion has lost its high aspiration. Passion has become choked in that heavy air. The men toil — the decent and the ignobly decent — without ever a sense of illu- mination in the dusty ways, or the light of a large purpose in it all. The women — what an awful picture- gallery of women appears in Gissing's tales of suburban existence ! — nag and hate, are restless with boredom and weariness, pursue ignoble, unattainable social 71 DE MORTUIS aspirations, desire without being satisfied. The whole offers a vision more disquieting and raucous than any vision of the squalor of material failure. Here, the Showman seems to announce at intervals, always with an ironic smile, here is the meaning of culture, civilisation, religion — in the forefront of your noisy " progress," in the city of your heart's desire. "Her object," said Mr. Hutton, of George Eliot's " Middlemarch," " is to paint not the grand defeat, but the helpless entanglement and miscarriage of noble aims, to make us see the eager stream of high purpose, not leaping destructively from the rock, but more or less silted up in the dreary sands of modern life." I have often thought this might serve for a verdict upon all Gissing's characteristic work. To produce this result he had, indeed, to cut out great sections of human activity. The physical satisfaction in food and the greater physical satisfaction in drink ; the delight in the excitement of betting, an election, an occasional holiday ; the illumination which comes to a few, at least, from a spiritual faith or an ideal cause ; even the commonest joy of all, " the only wage," according to the poet, which "love ever asked " : " A child's white face to kisa at mght, A woman's smile by candlelight " : — all these, if introduced at all, appear merely to relieve for a moment the picture of the desolation of London's incalculable, bewildered millions. Gissing set himself a legitimate artistic effort : the representation of modern life in a certain aspect, seen under a certain mood. It is London, not in the glories of starlight or sunset, but under the leaden sky of a cold November afternoon. The third of Henley's "London Voluntaries" is th# 72 GEORGE GISSING characteristic outward scene of Mr. Gissing's gaunt picture ; in which the " afflicted city " " seema A nightmare labyrinthine, dim and drifting, With wavering gulfs and antic heights, and shifting. Bent in the stuff of a material dark, Wherein the lamplight, scattered and sick and pale, Shows like the leper's living blotch of bale." The vision does not even possess the sense of magic and mystery of twilight and gathering night. The universe is simply raw and wretched, with a wind scattering the refuse of the gutter, and, too hideous and grotesque even to evoke compassion, a few old tramps and forlorn children shivering in the cold. It was because we saw in Gissing's later works an escape from this insistent and hideous dream, a promise of a warmer, saner outlook upon human develop- ment and desire, that we felt as a kind of personal outrage the news of his early death. For skilled, artistic craftsmanship he held the first place in the ranks of the younger authors of to-day. He was only forty- six years old. The later books seemed to open possi- bilities of brilliant promise. The bitterness had become softened. The general protest against the sorry scheme of human things seemed to be passing into a kind of pity for all that suffers, and an acceptance with thank- fulness of life's little pleasures. The older indignation had yielded to perplexity as of a suffering child. With something of that perplexity — with a new note of wistfulness, the sudden breaking of the springs of compassion — George Gissing passes from a world of shadows which he foimd full of uncertainty and pain. 73 8PENGEB AND CABLYLE A COMPAEISON HERBEET SPENCER teUs, in his autobiography, how shortly after his migration to London G.eorge Henry Lewes took him to see a writer whose work he had already examined with interest. " My visits num- bered three," he notes, " or at the outside four, always in company with Lewes, and then I ceased to go. I found that I must either listen to his absurd dogmas in silence, which it was not in my nature to do, or get into fierce arguments with him, which ended in our glaring at one another. As the one alternative was impracticable and the other disagreeable, it resulted that I dropped the acquaintanceship." And Spencer goes on to com- plain of Carlyle that " he thought in a passion " (and, hence, could not be regarded as a philosopher, who, above all others, thinks calmly) ; that the " old Norse ferocity " was strong within him; that he "lacked co-ordination alike intellectually and morally." " He had a daily secretion of curses which he had to vent on somebody or something." A verbatim report of these three or four meetings would prove to-day inimitable reading. For when Car- lyle and Spencer came together there was an encounter not only of two personalities but of two civilisations. 74 SPENCEH AND CARLYLE Spencer exhibited a life, for perhaps the first time in history, entirely organised on a rational and scientific basis. Each separate action was referred to general laws. Guidance was sought in the complicated tangle of life not in any "venture of faith," still less in the commands of human emotion ; but in a codified system of evolutionary ethics, with a deliberate search for such elements of pleasure as could be obtained without inter- ference with the pleasure of others. In places this system of natural morality became as casuistical and exacting as any of the rules and systems of venial and mortal sins of the Catholic moralists. Spencer turned back upon past action directed towards a certain end to examine with an almost pathetic refinement whether as a matter of fact the end has been attained; whether, for example, he had derived more happiness from billiards than might have been derived from other alternative occupation ; whether he was justified in the use of opium ; whether in his final examination of his whole life history he could pronounce, with some anticipation of an ultimate verdict of a Day of Judgment, that he had chosen aright in determining to devote his life to the cause of Evolution. He acknowledged a contiauous tradition of Nonconformist upbringing and ancestry, with no cross- ing of the pure stock — so that by inheritance he became the very incarnation of the "Dissidence of Dissent." This, overlaid with the inheritance of the " acquired characters " of three generations of schoolmasters, ex- plained sufficiently to himself the prevalence of those unamiable characteristics which he confessed with such naive simplicity. An aggressive disagreement with persons and accepted traditions, refusal always to brook contradiction, that inability to tolerate error in others which compelled him always to set them right 75 ■ DE MORTUIS when wrong, combined to make him a difficult person in society. "No one will deny," he said, "that I am much given to criticism. Along with exposition of my own views, there has always gone a pointing out of defects in the views of others." The "tendency to fault-finding is dominant — disagreeably dominant." Such fault-finding, he dismally announced, had brought into his life a double loss — on the one hand leading " to more or less disagreeableness in social inter- course " ; on the other "it has partially debarred me from the pleasures of admiration by making me too much awake to mistakes and shortcomings." Carlyle's dissent from current opinion was, indeed, as intolerant and even louder-voiced ; but it was passionate instead of rational, and hence far easier to endure. All his opponents were consigned in storm to the nether pit. The extravagant ferocity of denunciation was streaked with gleams of wild humour revealing a human being, an inspired, wilful, petulant child. There was nothing of the child in Spencer. The fault-finding was thin- lipped, rational, probably in every case justified, and hence intolerable. Each of these men was the product of inherited traditions of belief and conduct : of traditions which regarded happiness as outside the legitimate objects of man's endeavour. When Spencer attempted to organise his life upon an hedonistic basis all these traditions, which had become part of the very fibre of his being, leapt upwards in protest and rendered the experi- ment a failure. He was ever asking himself, "what have been the motives prompting my career — how much have they been egoistic and how much altruistic?" Caught in such cobwebs he painfully laboured through the whole catalogue ; examining in detail how far in controversy "the wish for personal success has gone 76 SPENCER AND CARLYLE along with the wish to establish the truth," and how far the one has predoniinated over the other ; or, whether he would have done better to marry ; or explaining how " in the kind of beneficence distinguishable as positive," the incentives " have been commonly neutra- lised by dislike to taking the requisite trouble." And every day as it passed became a subject of critical study and regret because it had gone charged with less positive pleasure than might have been. In the " reflections " at the end of the autobiography Spencer told of a chance incident of travel " in the days of my difficulties when compelled to travel in third-class carriages." " Opposite to me," he says, " sat a man who, at the time I first observed him, was occupied in eating food he had brought with him — ^I should rather say devouring it, for his mode of eating was so brutish as to attract my attention and fill me with disgust, a disgust which verged into anger. Some time after, when he had finished his meal and become quiescent, I was struck by the woebegone expression of his face. Years of suffering were registered on it, and while I gazed on the sad eyes and deeply -marked lines I began to realise the life of misery through which he had passed. As I continued to contemplate the face, and to understand all which its expressions of distress implied, the pity excited in me went to the extent of causing that con- striction of the throat which strong feeling sometimes produces." This extract might serv6 as a sample of the whole life history. The dispassionate pomposity of language, the dispassionate contemplation of his own emotions, the absorption first in the nature of the resonances and reactions produced by external events in the mind of the individual Herbert Spencer, accompanied by a 77 DE MORTUIS detachment and cold criticism which frees such absorp- tion from any charge of selfishness — such elements combined made of those thousand pages one of the most extraordinary of all human records. It would appear not impossible, indeed, that the author may be remembered for the personal history taken up in old age, and mainly to break the tedium of enforced idleness, long after the laborious constructions of the synthetic philosophy have become not only buried, but forgotten. Much of the life reads like frank caricature, the kind of rather cruel satire that used to be written by Mr. Mallock in his younger days. The reference of each chance action to large principles, the humourless judg- ment of events, the laborious justification of fishing or billiards — all these produce an efi'ect which would be inexpressibly ludicrous but for the pathos of the whole afi^air. In the author's earlier years " there was no sign of marked liking for children," he says in his quaint, impersonal fashion. " My feeling was of a tepid kind." Late in life, in an existence "passed chiefly in bed and on the sofa, I one day, while think- ing over modes of killing time, bethought me that the society of children might be a desirable distraction." Children were demanded and children supplied. The result was " to awaken, in a quite unanticipated way, the philoprogenitive instinct," and the society of two little girls " afforded me a great deal of positive grati- fication." Henceforward "the presence of a pair. of children, now from this family of the clan, and now from that, has formed a leading gratification — I may say the chief gratification — during each summer's sojourn in the country." Criticism is struck dumb by such entries as these. It is life organised on the system of the Data 78 SPENCER AND CARLYLE of Ethics and the millennium there preached ; a man moving through the rich and passionate experience of to-day with complete obedience to a reasonable appeal : a kind of nightmare of an entirely rational world. One possible variation from such frantic sanity was rejected as soon as it was understood. Spencer de- scribes his early friendship with George Eliot, "the most admirable woman, mentally, I ever met." He took her to the opera and the theatre, where he had free admissions — more used " because I had frequently — indeed, nearly always — the pleasure of her companion- ship, in addition to the pleasure afforded by the per- formance." He was then but thirty-two, and the philosophy had scarcely been projected. There were out-of-door walks, discussions on the terrace outside Somerset House. " People drew inferences." "Quite definite statements became cui-rent." " There were reports that I was in love with her, and that we were about to be married. But neither of these reports was true." In the reflections at the end, forty years after- wards, some indication of the reason was revealed. He had described in painful detail her actual physical appearance. "Usually heads have here and there either flat places or slight hollows : but her head was everywhere convex." He had once criticised a great beauty, alike in face and figure, " I do not quite like the shape of her head." " This abnormal tendency to criticise has been a chief factor," he sadly acknow- ledged, "in the continuance of my celibate life." " Physical beauty is a sine qua non for me ; as was once unhappily proved where the intellectual traits and the emotional traits were of the highest." Spencer's sturdy individualism produced a complete 79 DE MORTUIS disregard of authority, and tliat contempt or indif- ference for accepted opinion which was perhaps neces- sary for the elaboration of a new and unpopular philosophy. The extraordinary judgments on books and men scattered through the life are examples both of this waywardness and of that complete absence of moral fear which the author also recognised in him- self. Of Plato, "time after time I have attempted to read," he said, " and have put it down in a state of impatience with the indefiniteness of the thinking and the mistaking of words for things." " To call that a 'dialogue,'" he added, with that disordered common- sense which was the curse of his existence, " which is an interchange of speeches between the thinker and his ' dummy,' who says just what it is convenient to have said, is absurd." For Ballads with recurring burdens he felt " a kind of vicarious shame, at their inane repetition of an idea." Commencing Homer, " for the purpose of studying the superstitions of the early Greeks," after reading some six books he "felt what a task it would be to go on — felt that I would rather give a large sum than read to the end." He found "the tedious enumerations of details of dresses and sums," the " boyish practice of repeating descriptive names," "the many absurdities, such as giving the genealogy of a horse while in the midst of battle," the "ceaseless repetition of battles and speeches" intoler- able. Delighted with the "Modern Painters," he opened the " Stones of Venice " with raised expecta- tions. " On looking at the illustrations, however, and reading the adjacent text, I presently found myself called upon to admire a piece of work which seemed to me sheer barbarism. My faith in Mr. Ruskin's judgment was at once destroyed, and thereafter I paid 80 SPENCER AND CARLYLE no further attention to his writings than was implied by reading portions quoted in reviews or elsewhere." Such vigorous dismissal became more serious when the work was a piece of essential criticism in his own subject. Commencing the reading of Kant's critique, Spencer fell upon the proposition that " Time and space are nothing but subjective forms." This " I rejected at once and absolutely ; and having done so went no farther." "It has always been out of the question for me to go on reading a book the funda- mental principle of which I entirely dissent from," owing to the "utter incredulity of the proposition itself" and "the want of confidence in the reason- ings, if any, of one who could accept a proposition so incredible." Kant was flung aside. " Whenever in later years I have taken up Kant's critique I have similarly stopped short after rejecting its primary pro- position." It is interesting to remember that two of the most influential minds of the nineteenth century, who, if not exactly philosophers, at least dealt largely with the subject-matter of philosophy — the one from the side of theology, the other from that of the natural sciences — had thus failed to read the work which has laid the foundation of all future speculation. If Newman had read Kant earlier in life or Spencer's impatience of absurdity had not prevented him from persevering in its study, both the theological and scientific progress, the " Oxford Movement " and the " New Reformation," might have been profoundly modified. The actual efi'ort demanded in the construction of the synthetic philosophy was nothing short of heroic. The struggle through so many years of neglect and failure, the persistence, through failing health, in poverty, at the 81 e DE MORTUIS cost of final nervous collapse, is an achievement for which the world is richer, which should go down to the future as one of the great triumphs of human resolution over circumstance. After the early years spent in engineer- ing invention and wanderings, Spencer felt the call to his life work. Intense mental strain at the age of thirty- five upon a constitution naturally neurotic — he was the only surviving child of parents hoth of whom exhibited marked and painful mental derangement — ^produced insomnia and mental disturbance, which lasted the remainder of his life. All excitement had to be avoided, correspondence declined, the working parts of life jealously guarded for the great undertaking. Many of the chapters were dictated at intervals of racquets or rowing, the only practicable method — a quarter of an hour's exercise, then ten minutes' dictation, then exercise again. No less heroic was the long struggle for persistence against poverty. There is a letter written to John Stuart Mill inquiring concerning the possibility of a post at the India Office, which is almost elemental in its simplicity and dignity. " Unhappily my books have at present no adequate sale," writes the author. "Not only have they entailed upon me the negative loss of years spent without remuneration, but also a heavy positive loss in unrepaid expenses of publication. What little property I had has been thus nearly all dissipated. And now that I am more anxious than ever to persevere, it seems likely that I shall be unable to do so. My health does not permit me to spend leisure hours in these higher pursuits, after a day spent in remunerative occupation. And thus there appears no alternative but to desist." After an attempt to issue the books by subscription, 82 SPENCER AND CARLYLE the failure of adequate support again threatened abandon- ment. To prevent this Mill offered to guarantee the expenses of future publication and past losses — " a simple proposition," as he termed it, " of co-operation for an important public purpose, for which you give your labour and have given your health." The letters in -which this offer — " a manifestation of feeling between authors that has rarely been paralleled " — was made by Mill and declined by Spencer are permanent assets in the honourable record of literature. Eventually, partly through liberal support in America, partly through small inherited legacies, the work went on. " I am quite content to give my labour for nothing. I am content even to lose something by unrepaid costs of authorship. But it is clear that I shall not be able to bear the loss that now appears likely." Such were the efforts by which a philosophy not remote and dif&cult, but perhaps the most widely popular of all nineteenth-century expositions, could alone become articulate. The cost to its originator in vital power was irre- parable. At the end he discussed whether he had chosen well. Financially, " it was almost a miracle that I did not sink before success was reached." " One who devotes himself to grave literature must be content to remain celibate." "Adequate apprecia- tion of works not adapted to satisfy popular desires is long in coming, if it ever comes." Against such tardy recognition he set the exasperation of misstatement and the anger of threatened interests and offended prejudice. " Do I regret that I was not stopped by such dis- suasions ? " he mournfully asked. " I cannot say yes." So great was the impulse to proclaim the truth that any resistance would merely have produced " chronic irrita- 83 DE MORTUIS tion hardly to be borne." " Once having become possessed by the conception of evolution in its compre- hensive form, the desire to elaborate and set it forth was so strong that to have passed life in doing some- thing else would, I think, have been almost intolerable." To some, and especially to those hailing the synthetic philosophy as immortal, the triumph of the achievement may seem amply to compensate the ruin of its cost. I must confess a different impression. An enormous sadness broods over Spencer's life history. At the beginning are the shadowy recollections of ancestors, of hard, ioyless lives, whose ultimate impression is one of futility and failure. One grandfather appears as a gaunt, pitiful figure, whose mental decay ' ' took the form of supposing that he had matters of business to look after, and led to rambles through the town with a vain desire to fulfil them." The other is " the image of a melancholy-looking old man sitting by the fireside, rarely saying anything and rarely showing any signs of pleasure." The substitution of a conscious creed of hedonism for the stern Puritan survey of life seemed to bring but little benefit to their descendant. All through happiness proves elusive : the secret of well-being is not apprehended ; the sense of failure and baflled purposes is written large over the whole story. At one period all his friends urged him to marry as a remedy for his nervous affections. "Ever since I was a boy," he sorrowfully writes, "I have been longing to have my affections called out. I have been in the habit of considering myself but half alive, and have often said that I hoped to begin to live some day." That "some day" never arrived. To the end exis- tence was woven in a kind of bloodless scheme of moral principle, with the changes rung on egoistic and altruistic 84 SPENCER AND CARLYLE impulse ; as divorced from the life of men who love and hunger and desire, as the vision of the under- world of the Greek hereafter to those who shivered at its advent. In the later years the fame of Herbert Spencer has gone out through all lands. Him- self, an old man, wearied, and much concerned with his maladies, is passing to his grave amid mournful memories. For a few minutes in the morning he can dictate perhaps half a page of his biography. " Through the rest of the day the process of killing time has to be carried on as best it may." Walking has to be re- stricted to a few hundred yards ; reading of the lightest kind proves as injurious as working ; conversation has to be kept within narrow bounds ; recreation is im- possible, " two games of backgammon " having " caused a serious relapse." At night, in spite of the use of opium, there is never a full, continuous sleep. "No ingenuity," was his pathetic summary, " can prevent weariness." All outside the tangible, material universe had been rejected at the beginning, and rejected almost without a pang ; relegated to the region of the Unknowable and seemingly left there without any further interest or con- cern. Religion never left him because it never came to him. " Memory does not tell me the extent of my divergence from current beliefs," he here confesses. " The ' creed of Christendom ' was evidently alien to my nature, both emotional and intellectual. The ex- pressions of adoration of a personal being, the utterance of laudations, and the humble professions of obedience, never found in me any echoes." Early he wrote, "We cannot know " over all the ultimate questions of the Universe ; and, with his entirely reasonable mind, de- clined any further to trouble himself about them. 85 DE MORTUIS Occasionally, as when after his only game of golf with Huxley, he sees some boys bathing and wonders how such a creature as man has attained such dominance over the beasts of the field, some of the disordered and inexplicable things of life strike his fancy. But for the most part that sense of incongruity which is the founda- tion of humour was absent ; wanting not only in the pleasant fancies of verbal play but in the large and fundamental ironies of things which form the soul of tragedy. To a mind so entirely synthetic the universe came to arrange itself in relations, cubes, and parallels, an orderly framework ; and the elements which would not fit into this definite scheme of cause and efiect were quietly dropped out of sight. Even the great bereave- ments common to the lot of man awaken no sense of deeper meanings or clamorous, unanswered questionings. After the death of his mother — the loss which he seemed to have felt most deeply — he laments, with sorrow but with a reasoned outlook, a life " of monotonous routine, very little relieved by positive pleasure." The utmost he will allow is regret for " the dull sense of filial obligations which exist at the time when it is possible to discharge them, contrasted with the keen sense of them which arises when such discharge is no longer possible." Some natural tears he shed, but dried them soon ; convincing himself, with more success than the philosopher in " Rasselas," of the folly of gi-ieving over irrevocable things. Only at the end, when he is suddenly confronted with the brooding menace of death, does he realise the fact that beyond the evolutionary scheme were strange unfathomed possibilities, that the reason of man was but a tiny rushlight in an immense solitude, a plumb-line swung into the midst of an unbounded deep. 86 SPENCER AND CARLYLE With Tennyson, he trembles before a vision of Vastness, the abysm strewn with stars and the great cold beyond their transitory flames. He gazes back into a waste of time, forward into a fature like a shoreless sea. He can make no meaning of the world itself, the strange life spreading in the depths of ocean, the thousand types which have for ever gone. The insistent query haunts him, "To what end?" Along with this is the paralysing thought, " What if of all this thus in- comprehensible to us there exists no comprehension anywhere." Suddenly he finds a new sympathy awakened within him towards the adherents of the religions which he had formerly despised ; seeing these, as it were, the gathering of men together for warmth and companionship in the darkness of space, and the silence. "Keligious creeds " — so he concludes his astonishing narrative — " I have come to regard with a sympathy based on community of need ; feeling that dissent from them results from inability to accept the solutions offered, joined with the wish that solutions could be found." In the life of Carlyle we are breathing an entirely different atmosphere. The contrast cuts deep into the basis of being. Spencer is devoted above all things to liberty as an end. "As if it were a sin to control, or coerce into better methods human swine in any way," is Carlyle's scornful comment upon reading Mill's defence of the same position. Spencer again is at the heart of the scientific movement, the "New Eeformation," which was to create new heavens and a new earth. " Can you really turn a ray of light on its axis by magnetism ? " Carlyle shouts scornfully ; "and if you could, what should I care?" Beyond 87 DE MORTUIS these questions of opinion is the fundamental divergence in the outlook upon experience and its meaning. If Spencer's life was maimed by a too complete limitation to the things which are seen, Carlyle's was troubled by too insistent apprehension of the Unseen Universe. In an entry in his journal he describes how " I have been at Mrs. Austin's, heard Sydney Smith for the first time guffawing, other persons prating, jargoning. To me, through these thin cobwebs. Death and Eternity sate glaring." And the Vision of Death and Eternity, glaring through all that travail of eighty years, was not conducive to tranquillity. In one of his letters Carlyle tells how, after a period of severe mental strain, he rode down solitary into Sussex : through " the Norman Conqueror's country," the " green chalk hills, pleasant villages, good people, and yellow corn." "It is all, in my preternatural sleepless mood," he writes, "like a country of miracle to me. I feel it strange that it is there, that I am here." The sentence might stand for the secret of that violent life. The record is of one moving through a drowsy world in a " preternatua-al sleepless mood " ; and the nineteenth century, however to the dulled eye mechanical and grey, is to this man always " a country of miracle," The sense of magic, of en- chantment, hangs over the whole history. The present, so mean as it appears and so commonplace, has become transfigured with something of a glory only in general realised when that present has become the past and to- day has consented to be yesterday. The world of Nature is everywhere charged with glamour, silences and appeals which awaken emotion beyond the power of words. The world of man, the turmoil of politics and society chatter, is stricken through with the 88 SPENCER AND CARLYLE sense of great issues and a purpose beyond time. The humble society of peasants living obscurely in remote regions, the deaths and births and affections which form the common lot of common humanity, are illuminated with colours which are the stuff of dreams, and set in a background of all the Eternities. It is this transformation of the drab things of to-day which gives this man his power of fascination and wonder. In the letters is the real Carlyle : the man in his true self: " a wild man," as he describes himself, "a man disunited from the fellowship of the world he lives in." It is a life lived at a furnace heat of emotion, extravagant in laughter, in affection, in denunciation. He passes from a ferocity of contempt or an uncontrolled, shaggy humour, to outbreaks of appealing and mournful beauty. He beholds always good and evil visibly at death grips in the lives of men. Like his own favourite hero, he has enough fire within him to burn up the sins of the whole world. Consumed with a continuous restlessness, he is ever seeking quiet. " Learn to sit still, I tell you : how often must I tell you," he breaks out. "I persist in my old detennination to be at rest," he declares again and again. " God help us all!" "God be merciful!" "As God lives lam weary ! " — these are his constant burden. " Solitude is indeed sad as Golgotha ; but it is not mad like Bedlam ! " The world of wild warfare came more and more to be contrasted with a future beyond the storms of time. " We have hope through our Maker's good- ness," he vsrrites to his mother, " of a time that shall be always calm weather." " The soul that has been devoutly loyal to the Highest," he cries again, "that soul has the eternal privilege to hope. For good is appointed it, and not evil, as God liveth." The best 89 DE MORTUIS good for one so fire-tost and tormented is rest; " such rest as God's holy will has appointed, and as no man knows." Such thoughts were the only consolation after each outburst of astonished anger at the madness of men. " Poor Protectionists," he flared forth after the Disraeli Budget of 1851, " there never were men so ' sold ' since Judas concluded his trade." " This Jew, how- ever, will not hang himself; no, I calculate he has a great deal more of evil work to do in the world yet, if he lives." " Whatever British infatuation has money in its purse, votes in its pocket, and no tongue in its head, here is the man to be a tongue for it." Imme- diately he turns from such a ravening spectacle to that eternity which was ever his "strong tower." "The day is drawing down (with the generation I belong to), and the tired labourers one by one are going home. There is rest there, I believe, for those who could never find any before. God is great. God is good." All his letters are crowded with those verdicts on men which read so ferociously, whose first publica- tion scared the company of Carlyle worshippers, and tumbled to pieces the monstrous image they had erected of the Apostle of Silence. Beneath the Carlyle charged with a cold, intellectual restraint, weighing his words, preaching endurance and an austere, ethical creed — a lath-and-plaster figure — the real man is emerging ; infinitely more human, infinitely more lovable ; lacking, above all things, restraint, seeing the better course, but unable to follow it, violent, with fierce affection, drawing deep and fiercely the outlines and shadows of things. The prim moralist is offended at the reckless scattering of contemptuous and fiery judgments. Only those who have some similarity of 90 SPENCER AND CARLYLE temperament, who are accustomed to speak and think in superlatives, will understand the spirit in which these verdicts are cast forth ; understanding, they will refase to condemn. There is a wild humour ahout him, a mingling of denunciation with a kind of elemental laughter, in which the bitterness is dissolved. After reading a Qicarterly attack on Kingsley and Maurice, "very beggarly Crokerism," " no viler mortal," Carlyle suddenly ejaculated, "calls himself man than old Croker at this time." " One Merivale " attacked him in a review. " He is a slight, impertinent man," was Carlyle' s comment, " with good Furnival's Inn faculty, with several dictionaries and other succedanea about him — small knowledge of God's universe as yet, and small hope of now getting much." Of the theory of life of this economist " it struck me I had never seen in writing so entirely damnable a statement." "It is to me not a sorrowful prognostic," he concluded, " that the day of that class of politicians does in all ways draw towards its close." Others who had not thus the temerity deliberately to draw upon themselves the lightning of the gods were not spared. Of Jowett, " a poor little good-humoured owlet of a body " was the verdict, " ' Oxford Liberal,' and very conscious of being so : not knowing right hand from left otherwise. Ach Gott ! " Of Palmerston, " a tall man, with some air of greediness and cunning," was the unflattering description, " and a curious fixed sviile as if lying not at the top, but at the bottom of his- physiognomy." The worthy philanthropists of the forties became "scraggy critics of the 'benevolent' school." Louis Philippe was dismissed with con- temptuous pity : " I begin to be really sorry for him, 91 DE MORTUIS poor old scoundrel." "An old man now, and has not learned to be an honest man — he learns, or may learn, that the cunningest knavery will not serve one's turn either." The " Bentham Radical Sect" were treated to a crescendo of vituperation till they were finally dis- missed as " wretched, unsympathetic, scraggy Atheism and Egoism," which Nature will never make "fruitful in her world." "Enough, thou scraggy Atheism; go thy ways, vrilt thou ! " But there were enthusiasms for famous men no less superlative ; in addition to that continual flow of un- clouded family aflfection, the love of the clan, of the peasant for the peasant family; above all the whole- hearted elemental devotion of the son for the mother who bore him, which illuminates all the violent and passionate correspondence of nearly fifty years. In a memorable letter to Browning, "You seem to possess a rare spiritual gift," is the generous tribute, " poetical, pictorial, intellectual, by whatever name we may prefer calling it." " Persist in God's name, as you best see and can, and understand always that my true prayer for you is, good speed in the name of God." There was often a touching gratitude for favours given, a surprise at the toleration extended by " people in the highest degree zealous to accommodate the surprising monster who has been stranded among them." " Kindness is frequent in this world," he declared in a sudden quietude, "if we reckon upward from zero (as were fair), not dovmwards from infinity ; and always very precious, the more so the rarer." Carlyle saw with the eye of the mystic, the eye of the prophet. Common things lost their hard outlines. The world appeared as a procession of spectres and shadows. Again and again he cried 92 SPENCER AND GARLYLE that man is of the substance of dreams, and his little life is rounded with a sleep. " The dead seem as much my companions as the living," he asserted in one letter. " Death as much present with me as life." Sometimes the effect was ridiculous. The Devil visibly walks in Cheyne Kow, Chelsea, inspiring the unspeakable fowls of his neighbours to crow lustily in the morning, or stimulating the thirst for gin of the harassed domestics. More frequently, however, the vision closes in splendour. The things of the present are charged with the sense of mystery. The homely virtues and affections of the Carlyle clan are carried into a region of high emotion. The chatter and gossip of society are seen but as a flickering candle flame in the great red glare of sunrise. And in each successive bereavement Carlyle is caught up into regions of mystic sorrow and rejoicing, " a sacredness that led one beyond tears." Each obscure human life was for him a matter of infinity import. London, as he looked down on it from the Surrey hills, " its smoke rising like a great dusky- coloured mountain, melting into the infinite clear sky," became a meeting-place of Eternities in the " ever- flowing stream of life and death." In the graveyard of the dead, where " they all lay so still and dumb, those that were once so blithe and quick at sight of us ; gathered to their sleep under the long grass," the old man " could not forbear a kind of sob, like a child's, out of my old worn heart, at first sight of all this." Kead if you can without emotion the letter, magnificent in its simplicity, in which Carlyle describes to his brother in Canada the last days and death of his mother. It is the end of an obscure life, full of toils and sorrows ; the dust returning to the earth, as it was, 93 DE MORTUIS tlirough that last indignity which is the common lot of man. But to the eyes of one watching with a love unconquered by the fretfulness of time, the voyage of this humble soul " through the gloomy clouds of death " was charged with a solemn splendour and triumph. All the mystery of the greatness of human existence gathered round the moment of the passing into eternity of the spirit, returning to the God who gave it. The man to whom each solitary life was thus so sacred had the faith at bottom which alone can con- secrate all human progress. He had, indeed, no certain solution of ultimate mysteries. But he refused to put them aside. "God is great! God is good!" is his continual burden ; " there remaineth a rest," his per- petual prayer. " The ruins of time build the mansions of Eternity " is the one sustaining hope with the passing of the years. And all his longing goes out towards a meeting with those whom he loved, now so quiet, in " the Silent Kingdoms " where all that troubled the lot of man " shall there be without the walls for evermore." In such a contrast between the mystic and the man of science is summed up much of the hunger and disturbance of an age. Spencer's story of his existence is like the even passage of a still and cloudy day. The hours pass with scarcely perceptible change. There is a light in the sky, dull, if cold and clear, slowly fading with the coming of the night. Carlyle's life-history is like a day of perpetual unrest. There is the flare of the dawn with sunshine succeeding; and thunder-clouds roll up in tempest with lightning and storm ; and the clouds are torn apart for a moment, revealing the blue sky beyond ; and the sun sets in crimson and yellow light, 94 SPENCER AND CARLYLE with a menace of disquietude still on the horizon, rain and moaning wind, when darkness suddenly blots out the whole troubled scene. The one story ends in a vision of desolation. An irony worthy of an ancient and tragic fate compelled the man who, more than any previous thinker, had fashioned his action upon rational and consistent ends, most com- pletely to acknowledge failure. The conscious search for the prize resulted in the cry that the prize had somehow eluded the seeker ; and the neglect of all irrational things — love and human comradeship, the larger emotions, patriotism, and the losing of self in an ideal cause — evolved but the old cry of weariness, and the failure of orderly life to satisfy man's desires and his dreams. The other, from the heart of uncertainty and storm, under the purple sky and sunset, lifts up his hope triumphant above the things of time, sure in the consummation of the victory and the abiding rest beyond. " It was the Most High God that made mothers," he testifies, " and the sacred affection of children's hearts ; yes, it was He : — and shall it not, in the end, be all well : on this side of death, or beyond death ? We will pray once more from our inmost heart if we can, ' Our Father which art in Heaven, Thy will be done ' ! " " Alas ! the inexorable years," he cries, " that cut away from us, one after another, the true souls whom we loved, who loved us truly, that is the real bitterness of life." " How could one live," he had before written, "if it were not for Death?" "We ourselves, my friend " — this is his conclusion of the whole matter — "it is not long we have to stay behind ; we, too, shall find a shelter in the Silent Kingdoms ; and much Despicability 95 DE MORTUIS that barked and snarled incessantly round us here shall there be without the walls for evermore. Blessed are the Dead. . . . God is great, say the Moslems; to which we add only, God is Good ; and have not, nor ever shall have, any more to say." So in faith and perplexity, the one with an unanswered question on his lips, the other with the great longing in his heart still unsatisfied, these two men went down into darkness : and the grasses blow above their graves. 96 DI8BAELI AND GLADSTONE A CONTRAST OF all the memorable comparisons in history, in which two men of supreme talent have been exhibited struggling through a lifetime for the triumph of conflicting ideals, none will stand in history more illuminating than that of Disraeli and Gladstone. The superficial contrast has been a thousand times emphasised. But the material is now for the first time available which can enable the reader to penetrate beneath the surface show. All the accidents of birth, fortune, and educa- tion vanish ; and we enter those innermost recesses of man's being which all men hide from the multitude, in which the soul, stripped of the illusions of market- place and arena, is confronted only with itself and with Eternity. The careers of Disraeli and Napoleon III. are the two great romances of the nineteenth century. Each seemed for all the earlier time "impossible." Each at the beginning absurdly failed. Disraeli became the laugh- ing-stock of England, Napoleon the laughing-stock of Eurape. The grotesque invasions at Strasburg and Boulogne seemed to certify an enduring collapse to the 97 H DE MORTUIS one. Sydney Smith has descrihed the first appearance of the other at Taunton, and how he was called the Old Clothes Man by the children and pelted with slippers, and finally driven out in contempt. But each, confident in his genius and his star, pressed right onward, and each attained such dazzling success as must have excelled even his wildest dreams. The career of both was closed in eclipse and ruin. Both were assailed with such ferocity of vituperation as only falls to the few really great. And both, when all is over, have secured disciples essaying to erect an image of benevolence and moral earnestness — images which would have astonished the men who, however self deceived at the last, would never have mistaken these ungainly creations for por- traits of themselves. Disraeli's career was " a romance of the will that defies circumstance, and moulds the soil where ideas are to flourish." In the strange figure at the end as depicted by one of his admirers could be read all the history of the past. " Few who gazed on that drawn coimtenance," says Mr. Sichel, "could have discerned in it the poetry and enthusiasm of hia prime : only the unworn eyes preserved their piercing fires, and the sunken jaw was still masterful. A long discipline of iron self-control, much disillusion, growing disappointments with crowning triumphs, and latterly a great desolation, had subdued the fiercer force and the elastic buoyancy of his heyday. Yet the intellectual charm, and the spell of mind and spirit had deepened their outward traces. Fastidious discernment, dis- passionate will, penetrating insight, courage, patience, a certain winning gentleness underneath the scorn of shams, stamp every lineament." " He was truly unselfish, and he was never known to 98 DISRAELI AND GLADSTONE blame a subordinate." "In two things only he was profuse — books and light." Unlike his great rival in this as in so many other characteristics, he was "utterly careless of money." " Like childless men in general, he was devoted to children," " He was a firm friend: loyalty he always extolled as a sovereign virtue." "If he was always ' the man of destiny,' he was also ever ' faithful unto death.' " "Of music and art he was a devotee . " "In matters of courtesy he was old-fashioned and punctilious." "The common and the uncommon people fascinated him, for in them he found ideas : the middling charmed him less." In the world outside also, that austere, pitiless, senti- mental England of the mid-century, he was ever on the side of kindness and compassion. He possessed strong sympathy with labour and the sufferings of the poor. "He foresaw the overcrowding of huge cities through the waste of the soil with all its attendant miseries." With Euskin he asserted that the English poor " compared with the privileged of their own land are in a lower state than any other population compared with its privileged classes." He was "prouder of his many social reforms than of his Berlin Treaty." "What he specially sought to mitigate was irresponsible Pluto- cracy." The verdict of history will probably endorse Lord Acton's judgment upon Disraeli. " The man was more reputable than his party." He led them first by grati- fying their hatreds, later by stimulating their hopes. He led them through strange ways, but ultimately into the promised land. . The attempt, indeed, to prove that he was "con- sistent " throughout all his political career, that he was not " an adventurer," that his only motive was 99 DE MORTUIS the advancement of high moral causes, is an attempt compared to which the rehabilitations of Richard Crook- back and John Lackland were but trifles. No one doubts Disraeli's greatness ; no one seriously imagines this gi'eatness to be in the region of morality. His career is a study for the admirer of a great enterprise conducted through a lifetime with extraordinary tenacity and courage. It is an asset for the cynic, the historian, the detached observer of the absurd comedy of human life ; not, surely, for the moralist. The attitude of his admirers is more likely to be that of Mr. Swinburne in his protest against the whitewashing of Mary Queen of Scots. " Surely you were something better than innocent ? " Disraeli knew his world, " the islanders," as one of his biographers pleasantly terms them ; and he knew himself. Ho had the power of those who have stripped themselves of all illusions, swallowed all formulas. He posed, and every one laughed at him; but step by step he succeeded in deceiving first his party, then his country, finally himself. In such a survey, the superficial inconsistencies are negligible. Whether at first he appeared as a Tory or a Radical seems entirely irrelevant. Both opinions were quite reconcilable with his after-life. He hated the Whigs and the great houses who were excluding such as he from politics. He hated the middle classes, the Nonconformists. Above all, he hated that strenuous assertion of moral ideals which always seemed to him cant, which was to gather under the leadership of his great opponent and overthrow him at the last. He knew mid-century England as few others knew it. His novels, despite their absurdity and their bizarre, fantastic language, remain the most illuminating commentaries upon the changes which this England was undergoing, to 100 DISRAELI AND GLADSTONE which the many were so blind. Against these middle classes he apprehended, with the insight of genius and the detachment of the alien, there could be united the old English families from above and the populace from below. The Eeform Act of '67, denounced as a betrayal, was merely an attempt practically to realise this conviction. His policy was justified by its success. The force of moral earnestness and enthusiasm was the one force he could never understand. " I have been induced to analyse what ' moral ' means are," he once said ; " first, enormous lying ; second, iuexhaustible boasting ; third, intense selfishness." This solitary mistake ended his career in apparent ruin. Undoubtedly had he made an adequate estimate of the power of moral enthusiasm, he would have adjusted his policy to its demands, and used it for his own aims. But his success was never more apparent than after his death. He became a cult and a great memory. The romance of his marvellous career became magnified by time. His policy of uniting the gentlemen of Eng- land and the democracy which loves a lord against the manufacturers and middle classes prospered exceedingly. Other men entered into the heritage he bequeathed to them ; and England settled down with satisfaction at the end of the century under the Tory reaction for which he had worked with such unparalleled ardour and patience. In this he was true to his own ideas, and true to the interests of the class who cried out that he had betrayed them. The most vehement opponents of the Franchise Bill of '67, such as the late Lord Salisbury, were those who lived to reap the great reward of the policy which they had denounced. Without this 101 DE MORTUIS alliance the Conservative party were doomed to an everlasting sterility. With it they ruled England for seventeen out of the last twenty-five years of the nineteenth century. For such a transformation they have to thank this " alien adventurer " whom they never entirely trusted. They might, indeed, have remained in power for decades to come if they could have learnt the lesson he had tried to teach them : to press forward Social Keforms, to demonstrate aristocracy as the true and disinterested leaders of the people : in ruling, to give all that the people would themselves demand if they them- selves were in power. In Ireland he would have effected by English legislation all the reforms that an Irish Parliament could have effected for herself. At home, he would have pushed forward his "policy of sewage," persistently striven for better houses, better wages, shorter hours, a humaner life for the working population. He would have given everything except liberty : for he was shrewd enough to know that when everything which liberty demands is given, the demand for liberty itself becomes suddenly silent. Secure in the triumph achieved by his policy the Conservative party have repudiated the principles by which that triumph was attained. If the coming collapse of the Tory Government in England will mark the end not only of a party but of an epoch, the future will but justify Disraeli's prophecies alike of success and failure. And if once more the party which calls itself " Liberal " enters upon power, it vrill be because in adversity that party has learnt on the one hand to forget many of the ideas whose inherent weak- ness Disraeli descried ; on the other, to remember that forces more vital than the middle-class individualism of 102 DISRAELI AND GLADSTONE the mid- Victorian period are necessary for the healing of the diseases of a newer England. In face of so magnificent a spectacle as Disraeli's success, why arouse needless controversy, we may ask, by attempting to drag in something so irrelevant as questions of political morality? "I confess to be unrecognised at this moment by you," Disraeli writes to Sir Robert Peel in 1841 — " appears to me to be over- whelming, and I appeal to your own heart — to that justice and that magnanimity which I feel are your characteristics — to save me from an intolerable humiliation." " Do not destroy all his hopes," Mrs. Disraeli added, "and make him feel his life has been a mistake." Five years after, when reminded of this by Sir Eobert Peel, " I can say I never asked a favour of the Government," he calmly informed the House of Commons, " not even one of those mechanical things which persons are obliged to ask : yet these assertions were always made in that way, though I never asked a favour ; and as regards myself, I never, directly or indirectly, solicited office." Biographers have been concerned to explain this incident in a thousand impossible apologies. It is warmly asserted that Disraeli's bitter attacks upon Sir Eobert Peel were not directed by personal revenge for the rejection of his application. No one now imagines STich an explanation. Disraeli was after too high stakes to be turned aside by anything so petty as personal revenge. He attacked Peel because with the eye of genius he saw that Peel's desertion of the country party gave him the opportunity for which he had waited half a lifetime. It was the direct way to the hearts of the *' gentlemen of England " bursting with inarticulate fury, and welcoming with eagerness their spokesman as 103 DE MORTUIS their leader. One can regard with admiration the imperturbable courage and audacity with which he threw down this challenge to Peel. " In the small hours of the morning following the debate," Peel " was fishing in a sea of papers for Disraeli's letter," which he could not find. Perhaps had he found it the history of England might have been changed. There is no need to attempt elaborate explanation of forgotten memory or momentary madness in this particular incident of a career which never pretended to acknowledge the impeding limitations of the accepted moral standards. To any detached observer of an imaginary Gerolstein the career is one prolonged miracle. Even with a con- sciousness of the ruin effected, it is almost impossible not to cheer the onward advance. At the beginning, "looking like Gulliver among the Liliputians" suffering from chronic dyspepsia, he appears on the political arena " devoured by ambition I did not see any means of gratifying." He was an alien, without money, with- out friends ; obviously to the great families of England an adventurer ; impossible. At the end he has broken the charmed circle, penetrated to the centre, bent the great families of England to his will. He drives them unresisting along roads they dread, towards ends they cannot foresee. He has become the idol of the aristocracy. He is the intimate friend of the Queen. Finally, for one intoxicating moment, he stands in the full gaze of the world. Dictator of Europe. One half of the mind refuses to acquiesce. It sees the lowering of public life, the unscrupulous manipulation of ideal causes to forward one individual ambition; the flattery, the adroitness, the despising of men. Estimated now as if a long time ago and far away the playing upon pettiness and silly ambition appears the work of one 104 DISRAELI AND GLADSTONE who, in Mr. Bryce's words, " watched English life and politics as a student of natural history might watch the habits of bees or ants." The critic apprehends the dire consequences of this theatrical display. Modern Jingoism is one of them, which has poisoned the springs. Another is the ruin of the Christians of the East. Here is a heavy price to pay for the set limelight scene of "Peace with honour." But the other half of the mind is with him through it all. We applaud in whole-hearted fashion the spirit, the pluck, the unconquerable will and determination. We rejoice with almost a personal triumph as the long, seemingly so hopeless, efforts of thirty years terminate in the attainment of the desired goal. And, indeed, something more reputable remains. Outside the " game " of politics there was much altogether admirable. He was a dutiful son, an affectionate brother. He showed a real kindness to friends ; a certain magnanimity. The never-waTering gratitude to his wife for her whole-hearted devotion illuminates this strange character with tenderness and emotion. Above all, we owe him a certain cynical sincerity very useful for " islanders," one of whose characteristics is an unparalleled power of self-deception. " Lying is a crime only where it is a cruelty." " When I meet a man whose name I have utterly forgotten, I say, ' And how is the old complaint ? ' " "No dogmas, no Deans." In country houses "their table talk is stable talk." " They think it the battle of Armaged- don ; let us go to lunch." " I am never well save in action, and then I feel immortal." These and similar sayings have become part of the current coin of England's worldly wisdom. " Every one knows the steps of a lawyer's career — he 105 DE MORTUIS tries in turn to get on, to get honours, to get honest. This one (of a certain Lord Chancellor) edits hymns instead of briefs, and beginning by cozening juries he compounds with heaven by cramming children in a Sunday school." There is a real pathos about the end, the pathos which shrouds the end of all great actors. The play is nearly played. The harsh world of reality can no longer be kept out of the kingdom of fantasy and illusion. Like another great actor, Chateaubriand, he has " seen so many phantoms defile through the dream of life." " Yes, but it has come too late," was the reply to congi-atulation on the great triumph. " I am so blind ; I come here : I look round : I see no one : I go away." " Never defend me," was his last request. His definition of the most desirable life as " a con- tinued grand procession from manhood to the tomb " had been abundantly realised. " He faced the facts of life," said one who loved him, " psychological and spiritual, gravely, I had almost said sorrowfully : he faced them compassionately." " I had rather live," he asserted at the end; " but I am not afraid to die." His verdict upon one of the characters of his creation is perhaps the last word upon his own intimate soul, the self which withdrew so securely from the madness of life's fitful fever : — " What they called reality appeared to him more vain and nebulous than the scenes and sights of sleep." n Mr. Morley's great life and the Acton letters have revealed now for the judgment of the sympathiser 106 DISRAELI AND GLADSTONE and the cynic the springs of action of Gladstone's vast and complex character. Behind all the panorama of the outward show, the concern which for most men is all the world and its desires, stands that " heajrt of fire " whose history forms one of the most fascinating chapters in the story of men of renown. " Not for two centuries," says his biographer, " since the historic strife of Anglican and Puritan, had our island produced a ruler in whom the religious motive was paramount to a like degree." Later, as earlier, there is the revelation of the inner life : an inner life " maintained in all its absorbing exaltation day after day, year after year, amid the ever-swelling rush of urgent secular affairs." " Not a devotional chUd," this " great Christian ' described himself. " The planks between me and all the sins were so very thin." " The inner life has been with me extraordinarily dubious, vacillating, and, above all, complex," is his confession at the end. All the early years were spent in that rigorous, narrow, evan- gelical piety which fashioned the characters of most of the great men of nineteenth-century England. At Oxford he is organising prayer-meetings. When twenty-three years old he is refusing race-meetings and theatres as involving an encouragement of sin. In the early years of London life he is leading the limited and austere life of this bleak tradition. At first he cannot believe in liberty, and is bitterly hostile to atheists. As late as 1836 he is tormented with doubts as to whether a Unitarian can be saved. There is one characteristic scene in his biography, in which " I had my servant to prayers " before breakfast, and Words- worth, who has come as a guest, obligingly makes a third. He is a member of a brotherhood fonned by 107 DE MORTUIS Acland, with rules for systematic exercises of devotion and works of mercy. Amidst much that is inspiring there is much also that is tortuous and almost morhid in these earlier self-examinations and prim rules of conduct. " My inherited and bigoted misconceptions," he afterwards came to call them. He has not yet escaped from the stifling conception of a very limited salvation to the larger and freer atmosphere of a Catholic Church. The change, when it came, seems to have been en- tirely independent of the great spiritual upheaval at Oxford. Quite suddenly, upon his first visit to Rome, the sight of St. Peter's aroused a, longing for a visible unity of the Church. " The figure of the Church rose before me as a teacher," in addition to the Bibl©, hitherto the sole guide. The old cramping barriers gave way. A world vision of a vast society and fellow- ship, divinely ordered and guided for the salvation of the world, never afterwards left his mind. Hence- forth, amid " the sublime and sombre anarchy of human history," he beheld, says Mr. Morley, a Church Catholic and Apostolic, with " its ineffable and mys- terious graces " and its " incommeasurable spiritual force" — an immense mystery. "This is the enigma, and this the solution in faith and spirit, in which Gladstone lived and moved. In him it gave to the energies of life their meaning, and to duty its foun- dation." But a principle which Oxford failed to teach her children was already commencing to work. " The value of liberty as an essential condition of excellence in human things" was to unite with this passionate devotion to a Catholic Church, and prove the thread to that labyrinth of policy which made Gladstone 108 DISRAELI AND GLADSTONE through all his career the most perplexing of states- men to his generation. It was to undermine and cast aside all those frameworks of compulsions of which in the early days he was so determined an advocate. It led him into the tearing down of an Anglican Establishment, the abolition of Church rates and Church tests, and all the policy of liberality and liberation with which his name will be associated through all future time. Everything had changed at the end but his religious ideas. His earlier dogmatisms and disquietudes crumbled into dust as the years went by. But the deep bedrock beliefs of his nature in God and the soul and an immortal life remained always abiding and secure. " The fundamentals of the Christian dogma," says Mr. Morley, "are the only regions in which Mr. Gladstone's opinions have no history." The early period is fuU of the movement of the Church revival, with all its revolutionary consequences. Dissuaded from his original desire for the Christian ministry, Gladstone threw himself into the world of affairs deliberately as a servant of the Church. " I contemplate secular affairs," he says, " chiefly as a means of being useful in Church affairs." "Political life," says Mr. Morley, "was only part of his religious life." This crusading energy made him a strange figure in the realm of early Victorian politics, amongst that particular section of English life which has never learnt to take religion seriously. Continually