ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY 3 1924 062 805 209 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924062805209 Production Note Cornell University Library pro- duced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned using Xerox soft- ware and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution and com- pressed prior to storage using CCITT Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Stand- ard Z39. 48-1984. The production of this volume was supported in part by the Commission on Pres- ervation and Access and the Xerox Corporation. Digital file copy- right by Cornell University Library 1991. New York State College of Agriculture At Cornell University Ithaca, N. Y. Library ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT THE MACMILLAN COMPANY HEW YOEE ' BOSTON ■ CHICAGO ■ DALLAS ATLANTA ■ SAN FSANCISCO MACMILLAN & CO., Limited LONDON ■ BOUBAY ■ CALCCTTA HELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Lid. lOKONTO ROMAN > FARM MANAGEMENT THE TREATISES OF CATO AND VARRO DONE INTO ENGLISH, WITH NOTES OF MODERN INSTANCES BY A VIRGINIA FARMER Nrai f offc THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1913 All ritlUs reserved c \l Co^moHT, 1913, By the MACMILLAN COMPANY Set up and electiotyped. Published June, 1913. pKXas or T- MOBST ft BOVt OBKBVnKLD. ILUS-, O- ■■ A. PREFACE [E present editor made the acquaint- ance of Cato and V,arro standing at a book stall on the Quai Voltaire in Paris, and they carried him away in imagina- tion, during a pleasant half hour, not to the vineyards and olive yards of Roman Italy, but to the blue hills of a far distant Virginia where the com was beginning to tassel and the fat cattle were loafing in the pastures. Subsequently, when it appeared that there was then no readily availa- ble English version of the Roman agronomists, this translation was made, in the spirit of old Piero Vettori, the kindly Florentine scholar, whose por- trait was painted by Titian and whose monument may still be seen in the Church of Santo Spirito: in the preface of his edition of Varro he says that he undertook the work, not for the purpose of dis- playing his learning, but to aid others in the study of an excellent author. Victorius was justified by his scholarship and the present editor has no such claim to attention: he, therefore, makes the confes- sion frankly (to anticipate perhaps such criticism as Bentley's "a very pretty poem, Mr. Pope, but [v] PREFACE don't call it Homer") and offers the little book to those who love the country, and to read about the country amidst the crowded life of towns, with the hope that they may find in it some measure of the pleasure it has afforded the editor. The texts and commentaries used have been those of Schneider and Keil, the latter more accurate but the former more sympathetic. F. H. Belvoir, Fauquier County, Virginia. December, 1912. [vi] CONTENTS PAGE Note upon the Roman Agronomists, i Note on the Obligation of Virgil to Varro, 15 CATO'S DE AGRICULTURE SYNOPSIS Introduction: Of the Dignity of the Farmer, 19 jOf Buying a Farm, 20 Of the Duties of the Owner, 23 ^Of Laying out the Farm, 27 Of Stocking the Farm, 3 1 Of the Duties of the Overseer, 32 Of the Duties of the Housekeeper, 35 Of the Hands, 36 Of Draining, 37 Of Preparing the Seed Bed, 38 Of Manure, 40 Of Soil Improvement, 41 Of Forage Crops, 42 Of Planting, 43 Of Pastures^ 43 Of Feeding Live Stock, 43 Of the Care of Live Stock, 45 Of Cakes and Salad, 48 Of Curing Hams, 49 [vii] VARRO'S RERUM RUSTICARUM LIBRI TRES SYNOPSIS BOOK I The Husbandry of Agriculture CHAPTfia PAGE I. Introduction: the literary tradition of coun- try life, SI Of the definition of Agriculture: II. a. What it is not, 57 III. b. What it is. 72 IV. The purposes of Agriculture are profit and pleasure, 73 V. The four-fold division of the study of Agri- culture, 76 7° Concerning the farm itself: VI. How conformation of the land affects Agriculture, 78 VII. How character of soil affects Agriculture, 82 VIII. (A digression on the maintenance of vine- yards). 8S IX. Of the different kinds of soils, 88 X. Of the units of area used in measuring land. 92 Of the considerations on building a stead- ing: XI. a. Size, 93 b. Water supply. 93 XII. c. Location, with regard to health. 94 XIII. d. Arrangement, [ viii ] 96 CONTENTS CHAPTER XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. & XVIII. XIX. & XX. XXI. XXII. XXIII. XXIV. XXV. & XXVI. XXVII. & XXVIII. PAGE Of the protection of farm boundaries: a. Fences, lOO b. Monuments, 102 Of the considerations of neighbourhood, 103 2" Concerning the equipment of a farm: 106 Of agricultural labourers, 107 Of draught animals, 1 14 Of watch dogs, 118 Of fanning implements, 118 $° Concerning the operation of a farm: 121 Of planting field crops, 121 Of planting olives, 123 Of planting vines, 125 jf Concerning the agricultural seasons: 126 Of the solar measure of the year, 126 illustrated by A Calendar of Agricultural Operations throughout the year, in eight seasons, viz: XXIX. 1° February 7-March 24, XXX. 2° March 24-May 7, XXXI. 3° May 7-June 24, XXXII. 4° June 24-July 21, XXXIII. 5° July 2i-September 26, XXXIV. 6° September 26-October 28, XXXV. 7° October 28-December 24, XXXVI. 8° December 24-February 7, XXXVII. Of the influence of the moon on Agriculture to which is added 129 131 132 134 13s 135 136 137 137 CONTENTS Another Calendar of Six Agricultural Seasons with a commentary on their several occupations, viz: CHAFIKE 1° Preparing time: PAGE Of tillage, 139 XXXVIII. Of manuring, 140 XXXIX. 2° Planting time: Of the four methods of propagating plants, viz: 141 XL. a. Seeding and here of seed selection. 142 b. Transplanting, 144 c. Cuttage, 144 d. Graftage, and 14s e. A "new" method, inarching. 146 XLI. Of when to use these different methods, 146 XLII. Of seeding alfalfa, 149 XLIII. Of seeding clover and cabbage. 151 XLIV. Of seeding grain, 151 5° Cultivating time: IS3 XLV. Of the conditions of plant growth, IS3 XLVI. Of the mechanical action of plants. iSS XLVII. Of the protection of nurseries and mead- ows. iSS XLVIII. Of the structure of a wheat plant, 156 XLIX. 4° Harvest time: 157 Of the hay harvest. 157 L. Of the wheat harvest. 158 LI. The threshing floor. 161 LII. Threshing and winnowing, 162 LIII. Gleaning, 163 LIV. Of the vintage. 164 LV. Of the olive harvest. 16s 5° Housing time: 167 LVI. Of storing hay, 167 LVII. Of storing grain, 167 LVIII. Of storing legumes, 169 LIX. Of storing pome fruits, 169 LX. Of storing olives. 171 [x] CONTENTS CHAPTEK PAGE LXI. Of storing amurca, 171 LXII. <5° Consuming time: 171 LXIIL Of cleaning grain, 172 LXIV. Of condensing amurca, 172 LXV. Of racking wine, 173 LXVI. Of preserved olives. 173 LXVII. Of nuts, dates and figs, 174 LXVIII. Of stored fruits, 174 LXIX. Of marketing grain, Epilogue: the dangers of the streets of 174 Rome, 17s BOOK II The Husbandry of Live Stock Introduction: the decay of country life. 177 I. Of the origin, the importance and the econ- omy of live stock husbandry. 181 II. Of sheep, 197 III. Of goats. 207 IV. Of swine. 212 V, Of neat cattle. 225 VI. Of asses. 234 VII. Of horses, 236 VIII. Of mules. 244 IX. Of herd dogs. 247 X. Of shepherds, ass XL Of milk and cheese and wool, 262 BOOK III The Husbandry of the Steading I. Introduction: the antiquity of country life, 269 II. Of the definition of a Roman villa, 273 III. Of the Roman development of the industries of the steading, 283 IV. Of aviaries, 286 [xi] CONTENTS CHAPTXS PAGE V. a. for profit, 288 b. for pleasure (including here the descrip- tion of Varro's own aviary). 291 VI. Of pea-cocks, 297 VII. Of pigeons. 299 VIII. Of turtle doves, 305 IX. Of poultry, 306 X. Of geese. 31S XI. Of ducks. 319 XII. Of rabbits. 320 XIII. Of game preserves, 324 XIV. Of snails. 32s XV. Of dormice. 327 XVI. Of bees. 329 XVII. DEZ, Of fish ponds, 347. 353 [xii] ROMAN FARM MAXAGEMENT NOTE UPON THE ROMAN AGRONOMISTS Quaecunque autem propter discipUnam ruris nostrorum temponim cum prisds discrepant, non deterrere debent a lec- tione discentem. Nam multo plura reperiuntur, apud veteres, quae nobis probanda sint, quam quae repudianda. Columella I, i. ]HE study of the Roman treatises on farm management is profitable to the modem farmer however practical and scientific he may be. He will not find in them any thing about bacteria and the "nodular hypothesis" in respect of legumes, nor any thing about plant metabolism, nor even any thing about the effects of creatinine on growth and absorption; but, important and fascinating as are the illuminations of modem science upon practical ag- riculture, the intelligent farmer with imagination (every successful farmer has imagination, whether or not he is intelligent) will find some thing quite as important to his welfare in the body of Roman husbandry which has come down to us, namely: a back-ground for his daily routine, an appreciation that two thousand years ago men were studying the same problems and solving them by intelligent rea- [il ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT soning. Columella well says that in reading the ancient writers we may find in them more to approve than to disapprove, however much our new science may lead us to differ from them in practice. The 'characteristics of the Roman methods of farm man- agement, viewed in the light of the present state of the art in America, were thoroughness and patience. The Romans had learned many things which we are now learning again, such as green manuring with legumes, soiling, seed selection, the testing of soil for sourness, intensive cultivation of a fallow as well as of a crop, conservative rotation, the importance of live stock in a system of general farming, the preser- vation of the chemical content of manure and the composting of the rubbish of a farm, but they brought to their farming operations some thing more which we have not altogether learned — the character which made them a people of enduring achievement. Varro quotes one of their proverbs "Romanus sedendo vincit," which illustrates my present point. The Romans achieved their results by thoroughness and patience. It was thus that they defeated Hannibal and it was thus that they built their farm houses and fences, cultivated their fields, their vineyards and their oliveyards, and bred and fed their live stock. They seem to have realized that there are no short cuts in the processes of nature, and that the [2] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT: law of compensations is invariable. The foundation of their agriculture was tii^ fallow ^ and one finds them constantly using it as a sidiile — in the advice not to breed a mare every year, as in that not to exact tcx) much tribute from a bee hive. Ovid even warns a lover to allow fallow seasons to intervene in his court- ship. While one can find instruction in their practice even tcxiay, one can benefit even more from their ^ "The manner in which the ancients managed their fallow is certainly most worthy of our attention: their care in plough- ing, according to the situation of the land, and nature of the climate, and their manner of adapting the kind of ploughing to answer the purposes intended by the operation, are also most worthy of our imitation. Their exactness in these things ex- ceeds any thing of the kind found amongst the modems, and is even beyond what any practical writer on agriculture has pro- posed. This is an evidence that tillage is not even in this age brought to that perfection of which it is capable: and that, notwithstanding all the improvements lately introduced, we may yet receive some instruction from a proper attention to the precepts and practices of the ancients. I am desirous to add that this attention may be useful by preventing improvers from running into every specious scheme of agriculture pro- duced by a lively imagination and engaging them to study the great variety of soils and even climates in this island, and to be careful in adapting to these their several operations." Dick- son Husbandry of the Ancients^ XXIII. The Rev. Andrew Dickson, who died in 1776, was minister of Aberlady in the county of East Lothian, the son of a pro- gressive and successful Scots farmer, and had experience in practical agriculture, as well as in scholarship, as his book shows. 13] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT agricultural philosophy, for the characteristic of the American farmer is that he is in too much of a hurry. The ancient literature of farm management was voluminous. Varro cites fifty Greek authors on the subject whose works he knew, beginning with Hesiod and Xenophon. Mago of Carthage wrote a treatise in the Punic tongue which was so highly esteemed that the Roman Senate ordered it translated into Latin, but, like most of the Greeks,* it is now lost to us except in the literary tradition. Columella says that it was Cato who taught Agri- culture to speak Latin. Cato's book, written in the middle of the second century B. C, was the first on the subject in Latin; indeed, it was one of the very first books written in that vernacular at all. Of the other Latin writers whose bucolic works have sur- vived, Varro and Virgil wrote at the beginning of the Augustan Age and were followed by the Spanish Columella under Tiberius, and by Pliny (with his Natural History) under Titus. After them (and "a long way after," as Mr. Punch says) came in the fourth century the worthy but dull Palladius, who 'The compilation of rural lore, known as the Geoponica, which exists in Greek, was made at Byzantium for the Em- peror Constantine VII about the middle of the tenth century A. D. It is very largely a paraphrase of the Roman authors, and is useful principally in elucidating their textual difficulties. r4l ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT supplied the hornbook used by the agricultural monks throughout the Dark Ages. Marcus Porcius Cato (B. C. 234-149), known in history as the elder Cato, was the type of Roman produced by the most vigorous days of the Republic. Born at Tusculum on the narrow acres which his peasant forefathers had tilled in the intervals of military service, he commenced advocate at the country assizes, followed his fortunes to Rome and there became a leader of the metropolitan bar. He saw gallant military service in Spain and in Greece, commanded an army, held all the curule offices of state and ended a contentious life in the Senate de- nouncing Carthage and the degeneracy of the times. He was an upstanding man, but as coarse as he was vigorous in mind and in body. Roman literature is full of anecdotes about him and his wise and witty sayings. Unlike many men who have devoted a toilsome youth to agricultural labour, when he attained fame and fortune he maintained his interest in his farm, and wrote his De re rustica in green old age. It tells what sort of farm manager he himself was, or wanted to be thought to be, and, though a mere collection of random notes, sets forth more shrewd common sense and agricultural experience than it is possible [5] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT to pack into the same number of English words. It remains today of much more than antiquarian interest. Marcus Terentius Varro (B. C. 116-28) whom Quintilian called "the most learned of the Romans," and Petrarch "il terzo gran lume Romano," ranking him with Cicero and Virgil, probably studied agricul- ture before he studied any thing else, for he was bom on a Sabine farm, and although of a well to do family, was bred in the habits of simplicity and rural industry with which the poets have made that name synony- mous. All his life he amused the leisure snatched from his studies with intelligent supervision of the farming of his several estates : and he wrote his trea- tise Rerum Rusticarum in his eightieth year.^ He had his share of active life, but it was as a scholar that he distinguished himself.* Belonging to the aristocratic party, he became a friend and ^ Donald G. Mitchell made an interesting coUadon, in his Wet Days at Edgewood, of the large number of books on agricul- ture which have been written in old age and by men of a£Fairs, in many lands and many languages. * It is interesting to record, however, that Varro received the Navalis Corona for personal gallantry in the war against the pirates. This distinction was even more rare than our modem Medal of Honor or Victoria Cross, and was awarded only to a commander who leapt under arms on the deck of an enemies' ship and then succeeded in capturing her. [61 ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT supporter of Pompey, and, after holding a naval com- mand under him in the war against the Pirates in B. C. 67, was his legatus in Spain at the beginning of the civil wars and there surrendered to Caesar. He was again on the losing side at the battle of Pharsalia, but was pardoned by Caesar, who selected him to be librarian of the public library he proposed to estab- lish at Rome.^ From this time Varro eschewed poli- tics and devoted himself to letters, although his trou- bles were not yet at an end : after the death of Caesar, the ruthless Antony despoiled his villa at Casinum (where Varro had built the aviary described in book Three), and like Cicero he was included in the pro- scriptions which followed the compact of the trium- virs, but in the end unlike Cicero he escaped and spent his last years peacefully at his villas at Cumae and Tusculum. His literary activity was astonishing: he wrote at least six hundred books covering a wide range of antiquarian research. St. Augustine, who dearly * Caesar did not live to accomplish this, but some years after his death a public library was established at Rome by Asinius Pollio, which Pliny says (H. N. VII, 31) was the first ever built, those at Alexandria and Pergamus having been private insti- tutions of the kings. In a land where public libraries have been every where founded out of the accumulations of Big Business, it is interest- ing to note that Pollio derived the funds with which this the first of their kind was endowed, from the plunder of the Illyrians! [7] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT loved to turn a balanced phrase, says that Varro had read so much that it is difficult to understand when he found time to write, while on the other hand he wrote so much that one can scarcely read all his books. Cicero, who claimed him as an intimate friend, describes {Acad. Ill) what Varro had written before B. C. 46, but he went on producing to the end of his long life, eighteen years later: "For," says Cicero, "while we are sojourners, so to speak, in our own city and wandering about like strangers, your books have conducted us, as it were, home again, so as to enable us at last to recognize who and whence we are. You have discussed the antiquities of our country and the variety of dates and chronology relating to it. You have explained the laws which regulate sacrifices and priests : you have unfolded the customs of the city both in war and peace: you have described the various quarters and districts : you have omitted mentioning none of the names, or kinds, or functions, or causes of divine or human things: you have thrown a flood of light on our poets and alto- gether on Latin literature and the Latin language: you have yourself composed a poem of varied beau- ties and elegant in almost every part: and you have in many places touched upon philosophy in a manner sufficient to excite our curiosity, though inadequate to instruct us." [8] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT Of Varro's works, beside the Rerum Rusticarum, there have survived only fragments, including a considerable portion of the treatise on the Latin language: the story is that most of his books were deliberately destroyed at the procurement of the Church to conceal St. Augustine's plagiarism from them; yet the De Civitate Dei, which is largely de- voted to refuting Varro's pagan theology, is a peren- nial monument to his fame. St. Augustine says (VI, 2): "Although his elocution has less charm, he is so full of learning and philosophy that ... he instructs the student of facts as much as Cicero de- lights the student of style." Varro's treatise on farm management is the best practical book on the subject which has come down to us from antiquity. It has not the spontaneous originality of Cato, nor the detail and suave elegance of Columella. Walter Harte in his Essays on Hus- bandry (1764) says that Cato writes like an English squire and Varro like a French academician. This is just comment on Cato but it is at once too much and too little to say of Varro: a French academician might be proud of his antiquarian learning, but would balk at his awkward and homely Latin, as in- deed one French academician, M. Boissier, has since done. '' The real merit of Varro's book is that it is the well digested system of an experienced and success- [9I ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT ful farmer who has seen and practised all that he records. The authority from which Virgil drew the prac- tical farming lore, for which he has been extolled in all ages, was Varro: indeed, as a farm manual the Georgics go astray only when they depart from Varro. It is worth while to elaborate this point, which Pro- fessor Sellar, in his argument for the originality of Virgil, only suggests.* After Philippi the times were ripe for books on ag- riculture. The Roman world had been divided be- tween Octavian and Antony and there was peace in Italy: men were turning "back to the land." An agricultural regeneration of Italy was impend- ing, chiefly in viticulture, as Ferrero has pointed out. With far sighted appreciation of the economic ad- vantages of this, Octavian determined to promote the movement, which became one of the completed glories of the Augustan Age, when Horace sang Tua, Cxsar, aetas Fruges et agris rettulit uberes. * Cf . Sellar, Roman Poets of the Augustan Age. Virgil Ch. V. Boissier, Etudes sur M. T. Farron, Ch. IX. Servius Comm. in Verg. Georg. I, 43. It does not appear that many of the commentators on Virgil have taken the trouble to study Varro thoroughly. They are usually better scholars than farmers. ho] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT T^arro's book appeared in B. C. 37 and during that year Maecenas commissioned Virgil to put into verse the spirit of the times; just as, under similar circumstances, Cromwell pensioned Samuel Hartlib. Such is the co-incidence of the dates that it is not impossible that the Rerum Rusticarum suggested the subject of the Georgics, either to Virgil or to Maecenas. There is no evidence in the Bucolics that Virgil ever had any practical knowledge of agriculture before he undertook to write the Georgics. His father was a farmer and Virgil perhaps had tended his father's flock, as he pictures himself doing under the guise of Tityrus; certainly he spent many hours of youth "patulae recubans sub tegmine fagi" steep- ing his Celtic soul with the beauty and the melancholy poetry of the Lombard landscape: and so he came to know and to love bird and flower and the external aspects of wheat and woodland tilth and vineyard, hive and horse and herd, but it does not appear that he ever followed the plough, or, what is more important, ever laid off a ploughgate. As a poet of nature no one was ever better equipped (the highest testimony is that of Tennyson), but when it came to writing poetry around the art of farm management it was necessary [II] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT for him to turn to books for his facts. He acknowl- edges {Geo. I, 176) his obligation only to veterum pracepta without naming them, but as M. Gaston Boissier says he was evidently referring to Varro "le plus moderne de tous les anciens." * Virgil evi- dently regarded Varro's treatise as a solid foundation for his poem and he used it freely, just as he drew on Hesiod for literary inspiration, on Lucretius for imaginative philosophy, and on Mago and Cato and the two Sasemas for local colour. Virgil probably had also the advantage of personal contact with Varro during the seven years he was composing and polishing the Georgics. He spent them largely at Naples {Geo. IV, 563) and Varro was then established in retirement at Cumae: thus they were neighbours, and, although they belonged to different political parties, the young poet must have known and visited the old polymath; there was every reason for him to have taken advantage of the oppor- tunity. Whatever justification there may be for this conjecture, the fact remains that Varro is in the back- ground every where throughout the Georgics, as the "deadly parallel" in the appended note will in- dicate. This is perhaps the most interesting thing ' It is not remarkable that Virgil failed to make acknowledg- ment to Varro in the Georgics when he failed to make acknowl- edgment to Homer in the ^neid. See Petrarch's Epistle to Homer for a loyal but vain attempt to justify this neglect. [12] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT about Varro's treatise: instructive and entertaining as it is to the farmer, in the large sense of the effect of literature on mankind, Virgil gave it wings — ^the useful cart horse became Pegasus. As a consequence of the chorus of praise of the Georgtcs, there have been those, in all ages, who have sneered at Virgil's farming. The first such advocatus diaboli was Seneca, who, writing to Lucilius (Ep. 86) from the farm house of Scipio Africanus, fell foul of the advice {Geo. I, 216) to plant both beans and millet in the spring, saying that he had just seen at the end of June beans gathered and millet sowed on the same day: from which he generalized that Virgil disregarded the truth to turn a graceful verse, and sought rather to delight his reader than to instruct the husbandman. This kind of cheap criticism does not increase our respect for Nero's philosophic minis- ter.i Whatever may have been Virgil's mistakes, 1 Cf. F. W. H. Myers' Classical Essays, p. 1 10: " For in the face of some German criticism it is necessary to repeat that in order to judge poetry it is, before all things, necessary to enjoy it. We may all desire that historical and philological science should push her dominion into every recess of human action and human speech, but we must utter some protest when the very heights of Parnassus are invaded by a spirit which surely is not science, but her unmeaning shadow; a spirit which would degrade every masterpiece of human genius into the mere pabulum of hungry professors, and which values a poet's text only as a field for the rivalries of sterile pedantry and arbitrary conjecture." [13] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT every fanner of sentiment should thank God that one of the greatest poems in any language contains as much as it does of a sound tradition of the practical side of his art, and here is where Varro is entitled to the appreciation which is always due the school- master of a genius. iHl NOTE ON THE OBLIGATION OF VIRGIL TO VARRO U<¥^^^^ T the beginning of the first Georgic (i~S) Virgil lays out the scope of the poem as dealing with three subjects, agriculture, the care of live stock and the husbandry of bees. This was Varro's plan (R. R. I, i, 2, and I, 2 passim) except that under the third head Varro included, with bees, all the other kinds of stock which were usually kept at a Roman steading. Varro asserts that his was the first scientific classification of the subject ever made. Virgil (G. I, 5-13) begins too with the invocation of the Sun and the Moon and certain rural deities, as did Varro (R. R. I, i, 4). The passages should be compared for, as M. Gaston Boissier has pointed out, the difference in the point of view of the two mien is here illustrated by the fact that Varro appeals to purely Roman deities, while Virgil invokes the literary gods of Greece. Following the Georgics through, one who has studied Varro will note other passages for which a suggestion may be found in Varro, usually in facts, but some times in thought and even in words, viz: Before beginning his agri- cultural operations a farmer should study the char- tisl ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT acter of the country (G. I, 50: R. R. I, 6), the prevail- ing winds and the climate (G. I. 51 : R. R. I, 2, 3), the farming practice of the neighbourhood (G. I, 52: R. R. 1, 18, 7), "this land is fit for corn, that for vines, and the other for trees," (G. I, 54: R. R. I, 6, 5). He should practise fallow and rotation (G. I, 71 : R. R. I, 44, 2), and compensate the land by planting legumes (G. I, 74: R. R. I, 23); he should irrigate his meadows in summer (G. I, 104: R. R. I, 31, 5), and drain off surface water in winter (G. I, 113: R. R. I, 36). Man has progressed from a primitive state, when he subsisted on nuts and berries, to the domes- tication of animals and to agriculture (G. I, 1 21-159: R. R, II, I, 3), The threshing floor must be protected from pests (G. I, 178: R. R. I, 51). Seed should be carefully selected (G, I, 197: R. R. 40, 2); the time for sowing grain is the autumn (G. I, 219: R. R. I, 34). "Everlasting night" prevails in the Arctic regions (G. I, 247: R. R. I, 2, 5); the importance to the farmer of the four seasons (G. I. 258; R. R. I, 27) and the influence of the Moon (G. I. 276: R. R. I, 37). The several methods of propagating plants de- scribed (G. II, 9-34: R. R. I, 39), but here Varro fol- lows Theophrastus (H. P. II, i); trees grow slowly from seed (G, II, 57; R. R. I, 41, 4); olives are propa- gated from truncheons (G. II, 63; R. R. I, 41, 6). "The praise of Italy" (G. II, 136-176: R. R. I, 2, 6), ti6] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT where trees bear twice a year (G. II, 150: R. R. I, 7, 6). Certain plants affect certain soils (G. II, 177: R. R. I, 9). A physical experiment (G. II, 230; R. R. I, 7); the advantage of the quincunx in planting (G. II, 286: R. R. I, 7). Fence the vineyard to keep out live stock (G. II, 371: R. R. I, 14); the goat a proper sacrifice to Bacchus (G. II, 380: R. R. I, 2, 19). Be the first to put your vine props under cover (G. II, 409: R. R. I, 8, 6). The points of cattle (G. Ill, 50: R. R. II, S, 7); their breeding age (G. Ill, 61 : R. R. II, 5, 13); segre- gate the bulls before the breeding season (G. Ill, 212: R. R. II, 5, 12). Recruit your herd with fresh blood (G. Ill, 69: R. R. II, S, 17). How to break young oxen (G III, 163: R. R. I, 20). Of breeding live stock, the males should be fat, the females lean (G. Ill, 123-129: R. R. II, S, 12). The points of a horse (G. Ill, 79: R. R. II, 7, 5). Mares fecundated by the wind (G. Ill, 273 : R. R. II, I, 19). The care of the brood mare (G. Ill, 138: R. R. II, 7, 10). The bearing of a spirited colt in the field (G. Ill, 75: R. R. II, 7, 6); the training of a colt, "rattling bridles" in the stable (G. Ill, 184: R. R. II, 7, 12). Supply bedding for the sheep (G. Ill, 298: R. R. II, 2, 8), the goat stable should face southeast (G. Ill, 302: R. R. II, 3, 6). Goats' hair used for military [17] ROMAN FARM MANAGEMENT purposes (G. Ill, 313: R. R. II, ii, ii.) Goats affect rough pasture (G. Ill, 314: R. R. II, 3, 6). A shep- herd's daily routine (G. Ill, 322; R. R. II, 2, lo-ii). The life of shepherds in the saltus (G. Ill, 340: R. R. II, 10, 6). Beware of a ram with a spotted tongue (G. Ill, 387: R. R. II, 2, 4). Anoint sheep as a pre- caution against scab (G. Ill, 448: R. R. II, 11, 7). The location of the bee-stand : a drinking pool with stones in it (G. IV, 26: R. R. Ill, 16, 27); planted round with bee plants (G, IV, 25: R. R. Ill, 16, 13), and free from an echo (G. IV, 50: R. R. Ill, 16, 12). When saving a swarm sprinkle bees balm and beat cymbals (G, IV, 62: R. R. Ill, 16, 7 and 30). Bees at war obey their leaders 'as at the sound of a trumpet,' but may be quelled by the bee-keeper (G. IV, 70-87: R. R. Ill, 16, 9 and 35). Keep the mottled king and destroy the black one (G. IV, 90: R. R. Ill, 16, 18); the "old Corycian" and the brothers Veiani (G. IV, 125: R. R. Ill, 16, 10): the bees' care of their king (G. IV, 212: R. R III, 16, 8). Take off the honey twice in the season (G. IV, 221: R. R. Ill, 16, 34); the generation of bees from the carcase of an ox (G. rV, 281: R. R. II, 5, s) and cf. the wisdom on this subject attributed to Varro by the Geoponica (XV, 2). [18] CATO'S DE AGRICULTURA Introduction: of the dignity of the farmer \4xc