ASIA QJarncU UntDcratta ffiihrarg SUfata, ^em fork CHARLES WILLIAM WASON COLLECTION CHINA AND THE CHINESE THE GIFT OF CHARLES WILLIAM WASON CLASS OF 1B76 1918 BL 8O.M45'"'" ""'*'*'*"V Library ^''•illiaS5i.l.*e..wor|d and their rel M h5 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD AND THEIR ^clatians to C&ristiaititg CONSIDERED IN EIGHT LECTUEES POUNDED BY THE HON. ROBERT BOYLE FEEDERICK DENISON MAURICE, M.A. To yviinTTOv Toy 0eou 4tavep6v eOTtv ev aVTOi<;' o yap ©eb? aVTOts l^nveptaire.--' EoM. i. 19. SIXTH EDITION Sottbott MACMILLAN AND CO. 1886 MHS" EiOHAED Clay & Soss, EEEAD STREET HILL, LONDON, BuTigay, Suffolk. EIGHT HONOURABLE AND RIGHT REVEREND CHARLES JMIES, LOED BISHOP OF LONDON. Mt Lord, THEOasH your Lordship's kindness I was appointed to the Botle Lecttjebship ; the same kindness has permitted me to relinquish it at the end of one year. I take the liberty of presenting to your Lordship the Discourses of that year. The study of the subject which is considered in them has been most interesting and com- forting to myself; I shall be thankful indeed if it should prove of any use to my countrymen. Desiring for the Church universal, for that portion especially over which your Lordship presides, and for your Lordship personally, all the blessings of this season, I have the honour to be, My LoED, Your Lordship's very obliged Servant, F. D. MAUEICE. December, I84S. Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924022994184 CONTENTS. PAET I. LECTURE I. PAGE Why these Lectures were founded. Design of the present Course. MahometaDism. Its successes. Reasons assigned for them. Principle of the Faith X LECTURE n. Character of the Hindoo Faith. The Brahmin. Worship of the Pure Intelligence. The popular re-action. Vishnu and Siia. Relations of the English Government to Hindooism . . . 34 LECTURE III. Buddhism. Its origin and diffusion. Its various forms. The Lama. Buddhism and its rivals in China 66 LECTURE IV. The Old Persian Faith, and its destruction. The Egyptian. The Greek. The Roman. The Gothic. General Conclusion . . 96 PAET II. LECTURE I. Why Judaism has not occupied a separate place in these Lectures. Mahometanism related to Christianity on its Judaical side. Nature of the relation indicated. Wherein Mahome' auism differs CONTENTS. PAGE from Judaism. Dangers to Christianity from the forgetfulness or predominance of its Mahometan side. How the Christian Faith and Church satisfy the cravings of Mahometans 130 LECTURE II. The relation between Christianity and Hindooism generally com- pared. Mistakes concerning it. Investigation of its nature. The twice-born man. The Image of Brahm. Incarnations. Sacrifice. Dangers to Christianity from its Hindoo side. How Christianity can and cannot satisfy Hindoos . . . 162 LEOTUEE III. How this relation should be detected. The descent of the Spirit. Relation of the Christian Church to the Jewish. Supposed analogy to the relations of Buddhism with Brahminism. The resemblances and difference between Christianity and Buddhism. The Buddhist side of Christianity threatening its existence. How Christians may speak to Buddhists elsewhere, especially in China . ... . . .187 LECTURE IV. The early preaching of the Gospel — how it affected Greeks, Egyptians, Bomans, Goths. Form of this preaching. Eesistance from the doctrine of an Evil Principle. Mahometan protest against it, and for the sacredness of the outward world. Hindoo protest on behalf of a Divine kingdom. Buddhist pretest for an actual Indwelling Spirit. Modern infidel protest for humanity. Chris- tianity established by all. Conclusion . 216 PEEFACE. rpHE substance of these Lectures was delivered, accord- -^ ing to the directions of Boyle's Will, in one of the London Churches, on the first Mondays of certain months in the years 1845 and 1846. Though it is not imperative on the preacher to print his Discourses, it has been the custom to do so. Indeed the intention of the Founder seems to be scarcely fulfilled by addressing a series of Sermons on subjects requiring some attention, at distant intervals, to the eight or ten persons who in the present times compose an ordinary week-day con- gregation. In preparing them for publication I have omitted the texts, which were little more than mottoes, and have altered the forms of language which belong especially to pulpit composition. The object of the Lectures will, I hope, be sufficiently intelligible to those who read them. But it is a duty to speak of some writers who have discussed the same subjects, and to whom I am indebted. In the first Lecture, I have not touched upon the question which is considered in Mr. Forster's Mahomet- anisTn Unveiled. My business was with popular views upon the subject, not with learned and ingenious PREFACE. speculations. Of Mr. Forster's theory I do not feel competent to express an opinion ; so far as it evinces a desire to deal fairly with facts which Christian apologists have often perverted, and a confidence that the cause of Christianity must be the better for such fairness, it must, I am sure, have done good, even if the basis upon which it rests should be found untenable. Mr. Carlyle's Lecture on Mahomet in his Hero Wor- ship, is probably much better known to my readers than Mr. Forster's treatise. Some persons may have been led by that Lecture to identify Mahometanism with reverence for the person of Mahomet ; they will strongly object to the sentiments which I have expressed in one passage of this book. But I do not anticipate any such objection from Mr. Carlyle himself. No writer has more distinctly recognised the Islamite principle of subjection to an absolute Will, as the vital one in this faith ; or has exhibited a more earnest, I had nearly said a more exclusive, veneration for that principle. A man seems to him to be strong or weak, admirable or contemptible, p]-ecisely as he is possessed by it, or as he substitutes some notion of happiness, some theory of the Universe, in place of it. Those who feel that they are under the deepest obligation to Mr. Carlyle for the power with which he has brought the truth of this principle to their minds; for the proofs which he has given that, as much in the seventeenth century as in the seventh, it could break down whatever did not pay it homage, cannot be persuaded to look upon any phrases of his PREFACE. to them himself, as the most genuine expressions of his mind. They rather recognise in these phrases an attempt, confessedly unsuccessful, to bridge over the chasm which separates, as Mr. Carlyle thinks, the ages in which this faith could be acted out from our own in which it has become only a name. That no phrases or formulas, from whatever period or country they may be borrowed, can accomplish this object, Mr. Carlyle is a sufficient witness; that it must be accomplished in some way, his lamentations over the present state of the world abundantly prove. Those who think that it is the first duty of an author to provide them with sunshine, find these lamentations intolerable ; there are some who seem to be pleased with them as they might be with any unusually strong exhibition of passion upon the stage. There are others who hear in his wailings the echoes of their own saddest convictions, but who for that reason cannot be content to spend their time merely in listening to them or repeating them. One who desires to lead an honest life, and learns that men in former days were honest, because they believed in a personal Being, who is, and was, and is to come, must ask himself whether such a belief has become impossible for him. And if we are assured by Mr. Carlyle that under the conditions of Mahometanism or even of Christian Puritanism it is now impossible, then we must again ask. Why so? Is it because the truth which made these faiths so energetic is not what it was ? or is it because it dwelt in them apart from other PKEFAOE. truths, without which in our days it can scarcely even exist, much less live? These questions may never present themselves to a dilettante admirer of Mr. Carlyle; those whom his writings have really moved, and who regard him with hearty, though perhaps silent, gratitude and affection, are, I know, haunted by them continually. If these Lectures should lead any one such questioner even to hope for an answer, they will do the work for which I especially designed them. In illustration of the remark that the Mahometan conquerors were not merely ' Scourges of God,' however they may have deserved that title, I would suggest to the reader a comparison of their wars with those of Zinghis Khan. May I advise him also to read with some attention the passage in Gibbon (Chap. LXIV. Vol. XI. pp. 391, 392, 8vo Ed.) on the philosophical religion of that Mogul whom Frederick II., the accomplished Suabian, the enemy of Popes, the suspected infidel, denounced as the common foe of mankind, against whom he invoked a crusade of all princes ? Gibbon's panegyric, illustrated as it is by his faithful narrative of the proceedings of Zinghis Khan and his successors in Persia, Eussia, Hungary, &c., of their incapacity to pre- serve a record of their own acts, and of their ultimate conversion by the bigoted Mussulman, is full of the deepest instruction. In connection with the remarks upon the constitution of Mahometan Society as exhibited in the Ottoman Empire, I would recommend the study of Eanke's PREFACE. excellent Essay upon that subject in his Fursten und Volhen. The second Lecture is a collection of hints, which may not, I hope, be quite useless to some whose per- sonal observations of India or whose knowledge of its languages may enable them to detect my mistakes, and if they please, to laugh at my ignorance. The scholars of British India and the intelligent natives have good right to despise any one who sets up his own notions in opposition to their testimonies, and who makes these notions an excuse for severe reflections upon a state of society with which he is unacquainted. They may possibly be tolerant of one who by comparing their testimonies, so far as he has been able to gather them, has corrected many crude notions which he had previ- ously entertained, and who desires nothing more than that any sentiments of disgust and contempt which Englishmen in India may conceive for the notions and practices which they witness, should rather be coun- teracted than strengthened by their English education. Professor H. Wilson has undertaken an edition of Mr. Mill's History of British India, in the hope, as he inti- mates in his preface, of correcting, by the evidence of facts, the harsh judgments of the Hindoos, into which the historian was led by theory. To the civil and military servants of the Company such a work may be as useful as the design of it is benevolent. But the missionary, though it is to be hoped he will not neglect to profit either by Mr. Mill's labours, or by the PEEFACE. experience and Oriental wisdona with which Professor Wilson has enriched them, is open to another kind of temptation, which the one will not much increase, nor the other enable him to resist. The actual sight of a country wholly given to idolatry, must be far more startling and appalling to him than any pictures he can have formed of it previously. Not to weaken these impressions, but to prevent them from overwhelming him, and so destroying that sympathy with the victims of idolatry which is the most necessary qualification for his task, should be the great object of his home instruct- ors. For this end, I think, we should aim, not merely at cultivating Christian love and pity in his heart : these will scarcely be kept alive, if there be not also an intel- lectual discipline (I call it intellectual, yet it is in the very highest sense a moral discipline), to show him what the thoughts and feelings of which Hindooism is the expression, have to do with himself, how they are interpreted by the experience of individuals and the history of the world. I look earnestly to St. Augustine's College, in the hope that it may fulfil both these tasks. Should it do so, it will be indeed worthy of its name ; it may be the instrument of restoring faith to England as well as of imparting it to her dependencies. For do we not need, as I have hinted in my last Lecture, to be taught that the Gospel is not a dead letter, by discover- ing what living wants there are in us, and all men, which it meets and satisfies ? It might have been desirable that I should have PREFACE. appended to this, and the two following Lectures, some illustrative notes : I had intended to do so, but I feared that I should increase the size and price of the volume, without conferring a proportionate benefit upon the reader. I can enumerate in a few lines the books from which my proofs would have been drawn. From them (and they are within the reach of persons who are as ignorant of Oriental literature as I am) much more may be learnt in the course of a few hours' fair study, than from long appendices of extracts selected at the pleasure of an Author. The Essay of Mr. Colebrooke on the Vedas, in the eighth volume of the Asiatic Researches, and Mr. Rosen's Latin translation of the Rig Veda, are at present * the chief helps which the Western student possesses for a knowledge of the earliest Hindoo faith. It is important to observe, that while Mr. Colebrooke's extracts are chiefly taken from the liturgical part of the Vedas, those upon which the late Rammohun Roy raised his argument for the corruption of the later faith, were doctrinal passages. His conclusion, as I have hinted in my Lecture, is therefore unsatisfactory, though it ought not to be called unfair or disingenuous. If he had quoted the prayers which Mr. Colebrooke has made us acquainted with, English readers would no doubt have * I understand that a young German, now in London, whose know- ledge of Sanscrit is profound, and his industry ^Z«s quam Gemianica, has it in contemplation to puhlish and translate all the Vedas. English money it is to be hoped will not be wanting, when the other and more indispensable req^uisite is supplied by a foreigner. PREFACE. discredited his boast of the primitive Monotheism of his country. But they would have done so hastily. Those prayers imply a Monotheism as certainly as the direct teaching; and the one may justly be adduced as the interpretation of the other. The question is, what Monotheism ? The prayers and doctrine I think make the same answer : a Monotheism which made it impos- sible to distinguish the object worshipped from the mind of the worshipper, and therefore which implicitly contained, and out of which was inevitably developed, the later Polytheism. We may be thankful to Ram- mohun Roy for helping us to detect the old faith at the root of one which seems so unlike it, but cannot allow him to confuse us, however innocently, by the use of a phrase, which is susceptible of the most opposite significations. The translation of the Menii Code, by Sir W. Jones, brings that part of the subject within the reach of all. I hope the reader will verify the account I have given of it by examining it for himself, together with the excellent digest of it, in the first volume of Mr. Elphin- stone's history. The third Appendix to the history of this eminent statesman contains an admirable commentary upon the Greek accounts of India, contained in the fifteenth book of Strabo, and the Indica of Arrian. The Vishnu Purana, edited by Professor Wilson, exhibits another and much more recent stage of the mythology — that which I have spoken of as produced PREFACE. by the artificial incorporation of the old faith with the different kinds of worship which had arisen from popular movements and reactions. To trace the progress of these movements with little help from external history, is of course difi&cult; no one solution of the problem can be certain ; all as hints may be useful. The one I have supposed seems to be internally probable and consistent ; still there is an objection to it which I have no wish to conceal. Professor Wilson offers reasons for thinking that the Puranas which have the Siva element predominant in therh, are considerably older than those which have the Vaishnava characteristics. It may hence be concluded that the Siva worship itself preceded that of Yishnu. If this were the case, I should be wrong in my fancy respecting the first transition from the merely abstracted Brahminical religion to the popular ; at least, wrong in assuming what may have been true in a particular case, as explaining the history generally. Other authorities think that the two forms of worship may have had a contemporaneous development in dif- ferent places ; a view not incompatible with the one I have taken, especially as it is assumed on all hands that the names considered as attributes or characters of the divinity, as forms through which he was beheld, existed almost in the first stage of the religion. The subject of the Philosophical sects among the Hindoos is treated by Mr. Colebrooke in a series of papers in the first and second Volumes of the Boyal Asiatic Transactions. These papers (which should be M. B. L. * PREFACE. compared witli the paper on the Vt5danta System, by Col. Vans Kennedy, Vol. III. p. 412) are full of interest. These writings of actiaal observers should be studied before the speculations of even the most intelligent thinkers. But I should be ungrateful if I did not say that the passages on India in the Mythologies of Baur and Windischmann, and still more in Hegel's Philosophy of History, with the little book of Frederick Schlegel, called Die Indien, have illuminated many dark and dull reports, and have enabled me to feel the connection between the thoughts of other periods and countries and those which characterise our own times. The temptation to speak of Buddhism merely or chiefly in this connection, is one which I was aware of when I entered upon the subject in my third Lecture, and which I strove to resist. I am sure that any advantage we may derive from a comparison of the . difficulties which have beset Asiatics in different ages, with those which are besetting Europeans now, must depend upon the earnestness with which we determine first to under- stand the former in themselves. If we are more easfer to make applications, than to ascertain what we have to apply, we may write a polemical treatise which will convince all who agreed with us before, and will furnish writers in reviews, who have exhausted their old argu- ments or invectives against some opponent, with a set of new phrases ; but we shall not remove one perplexity from any earnest mind ; we shall only throw into it a PREFACE. new element of confusion. The ultimate tendencies of Buddhism to entire evaporation, to mere negation, are manifest enough. The like tendencies assuredly exist, perhaps are becoming stronger every day, in Christ- endom. But to take the result of a certain doctrine or habit of mind, without considering its stages, varieties, counteractions; its lights as well as its shadows; how it weaves for itself at one time a dogmatic or sacerdotal vesture ; how it sinks at another into a mere specula- tion ; above all, what an Eternal Verity keeps it alive in all its forms; is not using it for the warning and instructi on of men, but turning it into a mask for fright- ening children. If it is well for us to show what possi- bilities lurk in Buddhism because they lurk in us, still more ought we to consider its actual history, because it is the history of a process which may be passing in the minds of persons whom we are most ready to think of as having reached the last development of unbelief; because it may be going on in us when we are giving ourselves credit for the greatest amount of faith. Entering upon the subject with these feelings I desired to hear of Buddhism not in digests, which represented it as a system at rest, but from intelligent observers who saw it in motion and described its dif- ferent appearances. The papers on the subject in the Royal Asiatic Society are for this purpose invaluable, especially those of Mr. Hodgson, to which I have referred in the text {Transactions, Vol. il. p. 222); that on Buddha and the Phrabat by Captain Low (Vol. ill. p. PEBFACE. 57) ; that on the consecration of priests by Mr. Knox (Vol. III. p. 271); the disputations respecting Caste by a Buddhist (Vol. in. p. 160). To these may be added different accounts of the Lama in the Asiatic Researches (Vol. i. p. 197, and xvil. pp. 522 — 524), and the later narrative of Mr. Turner. For a general state- ment, I know nothing better than the article on Buddhism in the Penny Gycloipmdia. Dr. Pritchard's ■works will supply valuable information upon this as upon most other subjects. Of course it would be absurd to slight the French writers upon Buddhism, though on a subject which offers such facilities for systematising, and in which systematising is so likely to mislead, it may be lawful to view them with some suspicion. Of the Confucian doctrine, on the other hand, they are probably the best, as they are the most zealous and enthusiastic expounders. The Quatre Zivres of Confucius, translated by Pauthier, is a moderately-sized and readable book, and the preface to it is very useful and instructive. The Chinese reverence of Fathers is abundantly illustrated in the fourth volume of the Mdmoires sur les Ghinois, par les Missionaires de Pdkin. All our recent writers, Davis, Medhurst, Gutzlaff, though valuable in reference to China generally, are rather vague and unsatisfactory on the subject of its religion. The Chinese exhibition at Knightsbridge was, in this respect, more valuable than any of them. The recent interpretation of the arrow-headed in- scriptions by Major Rawlinson will add, no doubt, greatly PREFACE. to our knowledge of the Persian or Zend doctrines. They seem to confirm the opinion which was so long entertained upon other grounds, that Darius Hystaspes was an instrument in the restoration of the true Persian faith, after it had been subverted by the Pseudo- Smerdis. It seems also clearer than it was before, that the reformation, which is connected with the name of Zoroaster, consisted mainly in the assertion of the absolute supremacy of Ormuzd. It does not follow that Ahriman worship was prohibited or wholly de- nounced : that it was continually re-appearing in the popular mind, is evident. The later Magian faith may have been an attempt to reconcile the reformed with the popular doctrine ; or rather, may it not be supposed, that Zoroaster's was the regal creed, and that the priest never more than partially recognised it ? What has been said respecting the three cycles of Egyptian gods, is explained at large in the JEgypten of Chevalier Bunsen, Vol. I. p. 423 — 433. He has a remark (p. 432) upon the mistaken effort to form Triads in different mythologies, by bringing together gods from different localities, or periods of history, which I have found very useful. Keeping it in memory, I think I have learnt more to find in the Triad, an interpretation of all mythology, than if I had laboured ever so diligently to find parallels for it in the external parts of the systems. If I had been writing a history instead of a lecture, it would have behoved me, when speaking of the rela- tions of Christianity with Persia, to have noticed the PREFACE. Nestorian missions in that country. I believe the history of these missions would throw an important hght upon the whole subject; but it would have led me into many details, which, especially in a recapitulation, I was anxious to avoid. To pass over any facts merely because they might tend to the honour of heretics, would be grossly inconsistent with the professions, and, I hope, with the spirit, of these Lectures.* * I ought perhaps to have noticed two laige Works, written hy Englishmen, on the subject of my second Lecture ; the Hindoo Antiquities of Mr. Thomas Maurice, and the work on the Literature, Manners, and Eeligion of the Hindoos, by Mr. Ward. They illustrate two habits of mind directly opposite to each other ; almost equally unfavourable, I think, to a true apprehension of the Brahminical faith, and of its relation to Christianity. Mr. Maurice seems to regard the abominations of idolatry as objects merely of literary interest and antiquarian curiosity. Mr. Ward can see only the hateful and the devilish ; of what good it may be the counterfeit, what divine truth may be concealed in it, and may be needed to supplant it, he has not courage to inquire. Each, I think, is refuted on its own ground. Dilettante scholarship is found not to be sound scholar- ship. That which has no hold on the present, proves not to be true of the past. Mere observers of evil do not describe the evil accurately or vividly enough ; the points may be correct, but the impression is false ; for want of light, we do not feel the darkness. I believe most persons find it exceedingly difficult to read either of these books ; quite impossible, to remember them. I ought to have said, when speaking of Eammohun Roy, that his Tracts were written originally for his own countrymen, not for English- men. They were first printed in Calcutta : collected and re-published in London, I believe under his direction, in 1832. THE RELIGIONS OF THE WOELD. THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD , PAET I. ^\ LECTURE I. Why these Lectures were founded. Design of the present Course. Mahometanism. Its successes. Reasons assigned for them. Principle of the Faith. TN the year 1691 Robert Boyle directed by a Codicil -^ to his Will " that Eight Sermons should be preached each year in London for proving the Christian Religion against notorious Infidels, to wit, Atheists, Theists, Pagans, Jews, and Mahometans; not descending lower to any controversies that are among Christians them- selves." He desired "that the preacher of these Sermons should be assisting to all companies, and encouraging of them in any undertaking for pro- pagating the Christian Religion to foreign parts ; " and "further that he should be ready to satisfy such real scruples as any may have concerning these matters, and to answer such objections and difficulties as may M. B. L. s 2 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [pakt i. be started, to which good answers have not yet been made." The two latter of these clauses seem to explain the intentions of the first. The objections to Christianity- urged by Jews, Pagans, and Mahometans were not, perhaps, likely to perplex an ordinary Englishman. But England, in the 17th century, was becoming more and more a colonising country. The American settle- ments were increasing in importance every year. The East India Company had already begun its career of commerce, if not of conquest. In his own particular department of natural science Boyle observed the most steady progress; no one was doing more to accelerate it than himself. He would naturally divine that an advancement, not less remarkable, must take place in another region, in which the interests of men were far more directly engaged. He must have felt how much the student in his closet was helping to give speed to the ships of the merchant, and to discover new openings to his ambition. As a benevolent man he could not contemplate accessions to the greatness and resources of his country, without longing that she might also be conscious of her responsibility, that she might bring no people within the circle of her government whom she did not bring within the circle of her Light. Accord- ingly, we find him offering frequent encouragement by his pen and purse to the hard-working missionaries who were preaching the Gospel among the North American Indians. Cheering words, pecuniary help, liECT. I.] REASONS AGAINST CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 3 and faithful prayers, might be all which these teachers of savages could ask from their brethren at home. But Boyle knew that difficulties which they would rarely encounter must continually present themselves to those who came in contact with the Brahmin in Hindostan, with the Mussulman both in Europe and Asia, with the Jew in every corner of the globe. A man who thought lightly or contemptuously of any of these, or of their arguments — who had not earnestly considered what they would have to say, and what he had, to tell them — could not be expected to do them much good. Moreover, Boyle was too well acquainted with philosophical men, with the general society of England, and with his own heart, not to be aware that there was another kind of opposition more formidable than this, which the proposal to diffuse Christianity abroad must struggle with. Was the gift worth bestow- ing? Were we really carrying truth into the distant parts of the earth when we were carrying our own faith into them ? Might not the whole notion be a dream of our vanity? Might not particular soils be adapted to particular religions ? Might not the effort to transplant one into another involve the necessity of mischievous forcing, aud terminate in inevitable dis- appointment ? Might not a better day be at hand in which all religions alike should be found to have done their work of partial good, of greater evil, and when something much more comprehensive and satisfactory should supersede them ? Were not thick shadows over- THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. hanging Christendom itself, which must be scattered before it could be the source of light to the world ? Such questions as these Boyle must often have heard propounded by others ; but the deepest and most painful suggestion of them had been to himself. He tells us, in the sketch of an European tour written under the name of PMlaretus, that " when he was still a young "man, after he had visited other places, his curiosity "at last led him to those wild mountains where the " first and chiefest of the Carthusian abbeys is seated ; " where the devil, taking advantage of that deep raying " melancholy befitting so sad a place, his humour, and "the strange stories and pictures he found there of " Bruno, the father of that order, suggested such strange "and hideous thoughts, and such distracting doubts of " some of the fundamentals of Christianity, that though "his looks did little betray his thoughts, nothing but "the forbiddingness of self-dispatch hindered his acting " it. But, after a tedious languishment of many months " in this tedious perplexity, at last it pleased God one "day he had, received the Sacrament to restore unto " him the withdrawn sense of his favour. But, though " Philaretus ever looked upon these impious suggestions " rather as temptations to be resisted than as doubts to "be resolved, yet never did these fleeting clouds cease "now and then to darken the clearest serenity of his "quiet; which made him often say that injections of "this nature were such a disease to the faith as tooth- "ache is to the body, for though it be not mortal, it LKCT. I.] BOYLE'S PEKSONAL CONFLICTS. 5 "is very troublesome. However, as all things work "together for good to them that love God, Philaretus " derived from this anxiety the advantage of grounded- "ness in his religion; for the perplexity his doubts " created obliged him to remove them — to be seriously "inquisitive of the truth of the very fundamentals of " Christianity, and to hear what both Jews and Turks, "and the chief sects of Christians, could allege for "their several opinions; that so, though he believed " more than he could comprehend, he might not believe " more than he could prove, and not owe the steadfast- " ness of his faith to so poor a cause as the ignorance of " what might be objected against it. He said, speaking " of those persons who want not means to inquire and " abilities to judge, that it was not a greater happiness " to inherit a good religion, than it was a fault to have " it only by inheritance, and think it the best because it " is generally embraced, rather than embrace it because " we know it to be the best. That though we cannot "always give a reason for what we believe, yet we "should be ever able to give a reason_whj_webelieve 'Mt. That it is the greatest of follies to neglect any " diligence that may prevent the being mistaken when " it is the greatest of miseries to be deceived. That " how dear soever things taken upon the score are sold, "there is nothing worse taken up upon trust than " religion, in which he deserves not to meet with the "true one that cares not to examine whether or no " it be so." (Works, Vol. i. p. 12.) 6 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. It is evident, I think, that a comparison of religious systems undertaken by a man who had just passed through so tremendous a conflict, and who had no pro- fessional motive for entering upon it, must have been something very different from a dry legal inquiry re- specting the balance of probabilities in favour of one or the other. I do not mean that Boyle will not have brought to this subject all the habits of patient inves- tigation which he ordinarily applied to the study of physical phenomena. The very anguish of his mind made it essential that he should seek for a real standing- ground ; and that he should not therefore strain facts for the sake of arriving at an agreeable conclusion. Indeed, it is difficult to say which conclusion would seem most agreeable to a man exercised as he was: there would be at times a bias of understanding, and even affection, as strong against Christianity, as his education could create in favour of it. But undoubt- edly, his object in questioning these different schemes of belief will have been to ascertain what each of them could do for him : what there was in it to meet the demands of his heart and reason. It was no occasion for clever special pleading ; the question was to him one of life and death : when he had once resolved it, the next duty was to act upon his conviction, and to strive that all men should be better for that, which he, because he was a man, had found to be needful fot himself. Upon this principle he founded these Lectures. The truth of which he had become assured, was, he' LECT. I.] FAITH, IN THE LAST CENTURY. 7 believed, a permanent one ; the next generation would need it as much as his own. He did not suppose that the actual relation in which that truth stood to different systems of belief could alter. But it did not follow that the inquiry respecting the nature of that relation would be exhausted in his day. As new regions un- folded themselves to European adventure, new facts modifying or changing previous notions respecting the faiths which prevailed in them might come to light; fresh and more trying experiences might make the past more intelligible ; the same doubts respecting the justice, wisdom, or possibility of bringing other men into our religious fellowship which presented themselves to his contemporaries, might appear again and again in very different shapes, appealing to even opposite feelings and tempers. The event, I believe, has proved that he was right. Within fifty years a prodigious change has taken place in the feelings of men generally — of philosophical men particularly — respecting Religious Systems. In the latter part of the I7th century, still more during a great part of the 18th, they were regarded by those who most gave the tone to popular thinking and who had the highest reputation for wisdom, as the inventions of lawgivers and priests. Men cleverer and more dishonest than the rest of the world found it impossible to build up systems of policy or to estabhsh their own power, unless they appealed to those fears of an invisible world which ignorance so willingly receives and so tenderly 8 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. fosters. This being the admitted maxim respecting religions generally, it seemed the office of the Christian apologist to show that there was one exception; to explain why the Gospel could not be referred to this origin; how entirely unlike it was to those forms of belief which were rightly considered deceptions. That many dangerous positions were confuted by works written for this object; that many of the distinguish- ing marks of Christianity were brought out in them; that many learnt from them to seek and to find a standing-ground in the midst of pits and morasses, it is impossible to doubt. 'But the demonstrations of God's providence were in this case, as in all others, infinitely broader, deeper, more effectual than those of man's sagacity. The evidence furnished by the great political Revolution at the close of the last century seems slowly to have undermined the whole theory respecting the invisible world and men's connection with it, which possessed the teachers of that century. Men are beginning to be convinced, that if Religion had had only the devices and tricks of statesmen or priests to rest upon, it could not have stood at all; for that these are ver)' weak things indeed, which, when they are left to themselves, a popular tempest must carry utterly away. If they have lasted a single day, it must have been because they had something better, truer than themselves to sustain them. This better, truer thing, it seems to be allowed, must be that very faith in men's hearts upon which so many LECT. I.] CHARACTER OF MODERN OBJECTIONS. 9 disparaging epithets were cast, and which it was sup- posed could produce no fruits that were not evil and hurtful. Faith it is now admitted has been the most potent instrument of good to the world ; has given to it nearly all which it can call precious. But then it\ is asked, is there not ground for supposing that all the different religious systems, and not one only, may be legitimate products of that faith which is so essential a part of man's constitution ? Are not they manifestly adapted to peculiar times and localities and races ? Is J it not probable that the theology of all alike is some-j thing merely accidental, an imperfect theory about our \ relations to the universe, which will in due time give \ place to some other? Have we not reason to suppose that Christianity, instead of being, as we have been taught, a Kevelation, has its root in the heart and intellect of man, as much as any other system ? Are there not the closest, the most obvious relations between it and them? Is it not subject to the same law of decay from the progress of knowledge and society with all the rest ? Must we not expect that it too will lose all its mere theological characteristics, and that what at last survives of it will be something of a very general y^ °'^i character, some great ideas of what is good and beauti- l*:5r~^ ful, some excellent maxims of life, which may very well [^^ C assimilate, if they be not actually the same, with the l^?d- essential principles which are contained in all other religions, and which will also, it is hoped, abide for i ever? rT\,p>- 10 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. [part i. Notions of this kind will be found, I think, in much of the erudite as well as of the popular literature of this day ; they will often be heard in social circles ; they are undoubtedly floating in the minds of us all. While we entertain them, it is impossible that we can, with sound hearts and clear consciences, seek to evangelise the world. Yet they are not to be spoken of as if they proceeded from a merely denying, un- believing spirit : they are often entertained by minds of deepest earnestness ; they derive their plausibility from facts which cannot be questioned, and which a Christian should not wish to question. They may, I believe, if fairly dealt with, help to strengthen our own convictions, to make our duty plainer, and to show us better how we shall perform it. All their danger lies in their vagueness: if we once bring them fairly to those tests by which the worth of hypotheses in another department is ascertained, it may not perhaps be hard to discover what portions of truth, and what of false- hood, they contain. I think I shall be carrying out the intention of Boyle's Will, if I attempt, in my present course, to make this experiment. I propose to examine the great Religious Systems which present themselves to us in the history of the world, not going into their details, far less searching for their absurdities, but in- quiring what is their main characteristical principle. If we find, as the objectors say, good in each of them, we shall desire to know what this good is, and under what conditions it may be preserved and made effectual. LECT. I.] MAHOMET ANISM— ITS PROGRESS. 11 These questions may, I think, be kept distinct from those which will occupy us in the latter half of the course. In what relation does Christianity stand to these different faiths? If there be a faith which is meant for mankind, is this the one or must we look for another ? I shall not take these systems in their historical order, but rather according to the extent of the influence they have exerted over mankind ; a reason which would at once determine me to begin in the present Lecture with Mahometanism. For the first ninety years after the publication of this religion in the world, the Christians of Europe could do little more than wonder at its amazing and, as it seemed, fatal, progress in Asia and Africa. Before the end of a century it had obtained a settlement in a corner of their own Continent and threatened every part of it. But the new Western Empire established itself, Christian champions appeared in Spain, the power of the Caliphs declined. Then Islamism appeared again in another conquering, proselytising tribe. For two centuries the European nations wrestled to recover its conquests in the Holy Land. A period followed during which the disciples of both religions seemed almost equally threatened by Tartar hordes. These stooped to the- Crescent ; in the 15th century a mighty Mahom- etan government was seen occupying the capital of the East, threatening the Latin world, profiting by the disputes of Christian sovereigns with one another. 12 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. exhibiting its own order and zeal in melancholy contrast to the quarrels, unbelief, and heartlessness of monarchs and prelates. It became a question with the thoughtful men of that time, whether the Ottoman empire did not possess a polity which was free from the tendencies to weakness and decay that had existed in all previous governments, and whether it might not last for ever. In the 17th and 18th centuries, when the fallacy of this notion was making itself evident, Christians began to speculate coldly and quietly upon the causes which had given such prevalency to this faith in past days, and which still kept it alive in their own. It may be well to consider a few of the explanations which different persons, according to their different observa- tions or habits of mind, have offered of this fact, that we may not lose the benefit of any light which has been thrown from any quarter upon the nature or principle of the religion itself. I. It was an easy and obvious method of solving the difficulty, to say that the Mahometans had triumphed by the force of their arms ; personal valour and a compact military organisation being comprehended under that term. That they were warriors from the first, that their courage was often amazing, and that the Ottomans for a long time possessed the secret of military subordination, as scarcely any nation has ever possessed it, is evidently true. And it is a truth of which Christian apologists would very naturally avail themselves. The opposition, not in some accidental LECT. I.] FIRST MODE OF EXPLAINING— CONQUEST. 13 points, but in their whole scheme and conception, between the Sermon on the Mount, and the doctrine which could require or sanction such methods for its diffusion, would of course be carefully noted. Plain men would be asked to declare which teaching bore clearest tokens of belonging to the earth, which of a Divine origin. Nor was this argument an unfair one, however it might be, and has been again and again, traversed by an appeal to the practice of Christians, and the weapons to which they have resorted for the defence and propagation of their faith. For it is quite clear that the Mahometan wars were no accidental outgrowth of the system — that they were not resorted ItT^i"^ to with a doubtful conscience, with any uneasy feeling t?*^" that they might by possibility be inconsistent with the - — 9 o intentions of their Founder. On the contrary, the very spirit and life of Mahometanism exhibited them- selves in these wars. In them came forth all the most striking and characteristic virtues which the doctrine has a right to boast of. The Mahometan ruler felt that he was fulfilling his vocation when he was going forth against the infidel ; he could scarcely fulfil it in any other way. We know indeed that Bagdad and Cordova became cele- brated for all graceful refinements, for letters, even for toleration. We know that science, physical and meta- physical, became a distinctive mark of the Arabians. Where a book like the Koran, written in a beautiful language, is regarded with unbounded reverence, by 14 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WOELD. [part i. degrees it will be studied ; and out of that study •will be produced a literature which may spread itself in various directions. Monarchs would feel the influence of such pursuits, and would consider it their chief honour to direct them. But though periods like those of Haroun-al-Raschid were sure to occur in the history of Mahometanism, though in one sense they may be considered natural developments of it, they assuredly do not belong to the religion as such; they rather showed that the original spirit which possessed its disciples was becoming feeble ; they portended a further decline of it, and probably its revival in some more vigorous form. Whenever a Mahometan ruler quite ; allows his arms to rust, whenever he does not feel that i it is his main work in the world to diffuse his doctrine I by those means which are most simple and direct, we Imay be sure, whatever temporary prosperity may be ivouchsafed him, that his dynasty cannot last very long. But though on these grounds it may be fair to represent Mahometanism as essfentially warlike, it is surely a great mistake to suppose that by saying so we have accounted for its spread over so large a portion of the earth. No thoughtful man could accept such a solution, because when he hears of valour in men and discipline in armies, he must ask himself whence these proceeded, how they came to attach themselves to this particular faith, and because that question must inevitably lead him to seek for the real ground of success elsewhere. It cannot satisfy any Christian, LECT. I.] SECOND— POWER OP IMPOSTURE. ]& because the very belief which he opposes to that of the \ Mahometan must teach him that arms are not the most mighty things ; that there are secret invisible \ influences which are stronger than they. II. The proneness of the human mind to embrace any imposture was resorted to as a second method of accounting for this phenomenon, one which might perhaps combine with the former and help out its weakness. Of this proneness, the records of the world's history seem to supply abundant proofs — our own daily experience of others, and of ourselves, still more. All men, in one kind of language or another, have con- fessed that there is something in man which tempts him to entertain falsehood and disown truth, to follow deceitful guides, to reject the honest and true, to make a lie and to love it. And yet I think all confess, in one kind of language or another, that whenever any man, or any body of men, has learnt to relish what is false and dislike what is true for its own sake, that man, or that body of men, is in the last stage of cor- ruption and degradation — is approaching a point in which manliness, faith, and union become impossible — in which the death of all individual power, of all social existence, is at hand. That the elements of such destruction are in every human being and in every human fellowship at every moment, and that they are often gathered up in religious systems, none will dispute. But that they can account for the exist- ence of any thing which has endured for a long time. 16 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. [part i. which has manifested great power; that in them lies the source of a vigour and concentration which they are perpetually threatening to extinguish, I think no sane person who sets the question fairly before himself can believe. We may need the propensity of men to believe impostures, as a key to laany portions of the history of the Mahometan faith, to many circumstances of its present condition ; we shall not find therein the secret of its diffusion and predominance. III. Led by these or other considerations, to feel that what is right must be recognised in this faith, as well as what is wrong, Christians have sometimes explained its influence, by speaking of the plagiarisms in the Koran from the Old and New Testament Scriptures. That Mahometanism derived much from its connection with the older faiths of the world, would be con- fessed, I suppose, even by the philosophers who have least veneration for those faiths. They would easily acknowledge, nay, have often acknowledged, how much historical dignity and sacredness an Arabian teacher must have acquired by connecting himself with patri- archs who had lived two thousand years before; who were attached, by closest links of association, to the very soil his countrymen trod; whose doctrine he could speak of as the truth given to their fathers, now revived in its purity by himself. Nor would it be denied by these philosophers, that one living not only among Sabean worshippers, but amongst Christians and Jews, might advance his cause by professing his LECT. I.] PLAGIARISMS OF THE KOEAK 17 sympathy with much of the teaching in their holy books ; by saying, that he came to restore their systems to purity, while he delivered his countrymen from idolatry. But though, perhaps, thus much might be conceded by all, far more by a firm believer in the Bible, it may be firmly doubted whether the word "plagiarism" is one suited to the case; or whether, so far as Mahomet was a plagiarist, he could have exerted any influence. If he had merely transferred passages from our Scriptures to his, merely adopted formal doctrines which they set forth in living power, to mix them with his own notions, one cannot believe that he ever would have moved the heart of a single nation or of a single man. A teacher may, indeed, exercise a much greater power by reviving what is old, than by inventing what is new; but to revive \ V^u - ^ ^ v point the strong conviction of a truth which must be|'-^7"^' divine, which must be given us from above, becomes ™' mixed with self-exaltation, with the desire of showing how wise we are, and of exercising a dominion over others for oiir own sakes, it is hard to determine in any case. The more we know of ourselves, the more we shall understand how it is possible to vibrate between the certainty we have of principles, which for the sake of our moral being we cannot part with, and a positive- ness about notions which we have grounded upon them. When the conscience is clear, when the man is lowly, when he has been subdued by discipline, the opposition seems clear to him as between day and night; the delusion of his own heart is manifested to him by the lio-ht which God has kindled there. But amidst the noise of human applause the distinction which was so definite vanishes, the precious and the vile become j hopelessly mingled. Such personal experiences, which all have had in a greater or less degree — which earnest and thoughtful young men especially require to be schooled in, because it depends upon the way they use them whether strong and clear and bright impressions in their minds shall destroy their docility, shall make them merely utterers of some new notion, or shall ripen 20 THE EELIGIONS OP THE "WORLD. [part i. into blessed discoveries of that which is true — these experiences, I say, may help us to read the biographies of men who have had a great influence upon the world with a kindlier and truer feeling. Their impressions were, doubtless, more overpowering than ours, their conflicts greater, their temptations severer. It is hard to say, that because they called themselves inspired, they meant to deceive ; that language might be the language of humility, not of arrogance — the confession that every good gift, above all every illumination respect- ing any invisible reality, cometh from the Father of Lights. Not in this conviction, but in that pride which forgets Him — in the desire to be something in them- selves — do we trace the beginning of all imposture ; in the blending of the two together, the melancholy mixture which religious systems present to one who studies them in themselves or in their effects. I am far then from wishing to deny that Mahomet's character may have met with unfair treatment at the hands of Christians.- And it is, without doubt, one of the most noticeable circumstances in the history of his religion, that his own person should have been so much bound up with it ; that every caliph or sultan who has reigned over any tribe of his followers should have reigned in his name ; that the recollection of a man should have so much more power than even the book which Mussul- mans regard with such profound reverence; that the honour of a human chieftain should so markedly dis- tinguish a religion which looks upon man as separated LBCT. I.] HERO-WORSHIP.— MONOTHEISM. 21 by an immeasurable distance from the object of his wor- ship. But this last remark shows that the person and character of Mahomet, important as they may have been in their practical influence, cannot satisfactorily explain the charm by which his religion worked its way. In fact, it is one of the anomalies which requires to be accounted for, that a human leader should win this reverence. He himself declared and felt that he was nothing but a witness for God ; his followers received and honoured him as holding that office. All the worth he had in him was derived from that of which he testified. When he began consciously to take up any other position it was one of weakness. We may con- sider Mahomet a hero if we please ; we may regard the reverence for him as a proof of men's tendency in all circumstances to worship heroes ; but we cannot, without denying the plainest facts of the case, say that the success of his doctrine was a consequence of this dis- position. His teaching was emphatically the denial of that worship; every Mahometan sword was drawn to prove that it was false, and to put it down. VI. It might seem to follow inevitably, from what has just been said, that the Monotheism of Mahomet, and his hatred of idolatry, constituted the strength and vitality of his system. This opinion has often been maintained, and a reader of the history is continu- ally tempted to adopt it. As we follow any of the earlier conquerors through Persia, through Egypt, through the Greek empire, we feel that the enthusiasm of the chief 22 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part i. and of the soldier is connected with what they believe to be the destruction of false worship, the carrying out of the first and second Commandments. All the enemies of the Prophet are regarded alike as infidels, because A^ co-f) - all are thought to have raised something created into ^XoVL P^® place and glory of the Creator. The belief that I nothing in the earth, nothing in the heavens, not even ' light, is a symbol of God ; that not even man himself can be looked upon in any other character than as a minister of the one Supreme Being, evidently inspires every enterprise. In the strength of it they destroy temples, idols, priests, plunder cities, make slaves of their inhabitants, turn their children into soldiers of the Crescent. All this is true, and yet I think no considerate person will suppose that mere opposition to the grossest forms of false worship could give nerve to any arm, far less permanence to any society. If Monotheism means the not believing in many gods, it could, as little as the other causes we have enumerated, be the root of the Mahometan faith and the Mahometan power. VII. But these sweeping conquests of Mahomet are susceptible of yet another interpretation, which has sometimes been applied to the whole history of their dominion: they may be regarded as the righteous judgments of God upon guilty nations, whether these were the idolaters of India, the fire-worshippers of Persia, the con-upted Greeks, or the Visigoths. It is difficult, I should think, for any person really taking. LECT. r.] THE SCOURGE OP GUILTY NATIONS. 23 the Bible as his guide, nay, for any person recognising a Divine Providence at all, not to look upon every great earthquake which has shaken kingdoms as a Divine visitation ; not to see a Divine hand regulating outward circumstances, and the wills of men. Nor can we go so far without going farther, and asking what the state of those nations was on which the scourge descended ? If we pursue the inquiry fairly in this case, we shall be led, it seems to me, to the discovery of the real ground of the Mahometan might, and perhaps to regard the continuance of that might through so many ages not wholly as a calamity. In the Christian nations which were permitted to fall under the armies of Islam, almost as much as in those which were avowedly Pagan, the sense of a Divine Almighty Will, to which all human wills were to be bowed, had evaporated amidst the worship of images, amidst moral corruptions, philo- sophical theories, religious controversies. Notions about God more or less occupied them ; but God Himself was not in all their thoughts. The awe of an Absolute Eternal Being, to be obeyed as well as to be confessed, was passing away in some — had scarcely been awakened in others. The soldiers of Mahomet said, by their words and acts, " God verily is, and man is his minister, to accomplish his will upon earth." This we shall find was the inspiring thought in the warriors of the Crescent — this gave them valour, subordination, dis- cipline. This, where it encountered no like or equal feeling in the minds of those among whom they came. 24 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. [part i. made them invincible. We must not be content with talking of their armies; here was the life of their armies. We must not speak of men's readiness to receive an imposture ; in yielding to this assertion they were bowing to a truth. This was no verbal copy from ancient records; it may have been the oldest of all verities, but it was fresh and new for every one who acted upon it. It was no mere phrase out of a book — no homage to a mortal hero — no mere denial of other men's faith. Let us go yet farther and say. It was a mercy of God that such a witness, however bare of other supporting principles, however surrounded by con- fusions, should have been borne to His Name, when His creatures were ready, practically, to forget -it. The first Mahometan conquest, the continued Mahometan dominion, prove the assertion " God is " to be no dry proposition, but one which is capable of exercising a mastery over the rudest tribes, of giving them an order, of making them victorious over aU the civilisation and all the religion which has not this principle for its basis. I think that most persons studying the history of Mahometanism without prejudice, will feel that this is the principle which confronts them at every turn, and to which everything else is subordinate. And if so, the consideration is surely a very important one for our purpose. We are told that the mere theological part of religious systems is only a loose, flimsy drapery for certain maxims of morality, or certain ideas about the LECT, I.] INFERENCES EEOM THESE STATEMENTS. 25 nature and spiritual destinies of man. How does the study of Mahoraetanism bear out this opinion ? Is it a collection of moral maxims which has been its strength ? Is it some theory or conception about the nature of man? Precisely the opposite assertion is true. All mere maxims, all mere ideas about the nature of man, have proved weak and helpless before this proclamation of a living and Eternal God. The theological transcend- ent principle is just the one which has stood its ground, which has re-appeared age after age, which the most ignorant warriors felt was true and mighty for them, for which no cultivation has provided any substitute. We are told, again, that the character of particular localities and races determines what shall be the character of a theology; that that only is universal which concerns the laws of outward nature or the life of man. How does the history of Mahometanism bear out this opinion ? Let it be granted that the soil of Arabia was one on which it was fitting that such a doctrine as that of Mahomet should be first preached : let it be allowed that the Semitic race has been especiallj' distinguished from every other by an interest in what is purely Divine, by a comparative indifference to what is human. But here is an assertion which tribes the most remote from this are compelled to recognise ; which establishes itself in India, in Syria, in Egypt, in Greece. And it is remarkable that, while numerous sects and parties have been called into existence by questions respecting the proper successors of Mahomet, or the interpretation of 26 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part r. the Koran, the Divine principle among them has been the uniting one. It is said again, that the great doc- trines which have been embodied in religious systems are the creations of the religious principle in man ; that his faith moulds the object which it worships : in other words, that what is called theological truth is but some outward expression of our feelings or habits of mind. Look again at the history of Mahometanism ; consider the facts steadily : there are none to which the sup- porters of this theory should more gladly appeal. They can find no instance of a race of which faith in an unseen object has been more characteristic. " Faithful " is the very name by which the Islamite warriors proclaim themselves to the world. But what was the nature of this faith ? It meant nothing, it was nothing, except so far as it asserted a Being not dependent on itself; the ground of man's being ; one of whom he was the minister, not the Creator. The Mahometan believed that the God whom he worshipped must have revealed Himself — that man could not have discovered Him. He went forth to beat into powder all gods which he supposed man had invented. Take away these characteristics from his faith and it vanishes, with all the doings which were the fruits of it. One question still remains to be considered before I close this Lecture. May not the principle which Mahometanism embodies be left to the protection of the system which it seems to have created for itself? — • We must look into Mahometan history for the answer. lECT. I.] WILL THE SYSTEM PROTECT ITSELF. 27 When I spoke to you of the great power by which the Mahometan soldier was carried along in his enter- prises, of the principle which gave him strength and endurance, you may have wondered that I did not dwell more upon the rewards which were promised to him after death, upon the Paradise of sensual felicity for which the brave man was encouraged to hope. I did not allude to this motive, because I do not believe that it was the one by which the Mahometan hosts were really inspired. The mighty conviction that they were then, at that very moment, called by God to a work — that they were His witnesses and were the ministers of His vengeance, was, I believe, immeasurably more effective than any dreams, were they ever so gross and palpable, of what might be given to them hereafter. "When they had already cast themselves away to live or die, they had a sense of immortality which no such visions could impart, which alone made them credible. But when the Mahometan was at peace, the belief of a mighty Sovereign to whom he was doing homage, no longer sufficed him ; he began to ask himself what he was living for? To the multitude these sensual promises were a tolerable answer. These were the things to be desired; for these, by whatsoever means the Koran or its interpreters prescribed, if they were in earnest, they were to labour. Some, with higher apprehensions, would feel that such rewards were not satisfying; they would explain away the language of Mahomet, and pursue the practices, to which the others 28 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. [part i. submitted in hope of earthly gratifications, that they miofht attain the knowledge or vision of God. The former would fall into gross moral corruptions, the latter would indulge in philosophical speculations — would found sects — would substitute theories and notions for that Being in whose name their fathers had fought. This has actually been the case, and hence it has been proved that Mahometanism can only thrive while jt^ is aiming at conc[uest. Why ? Because it is the proclamation of a mere Sovereign, who employs men to declare the fact that he is a Sovereign, and to enforce it upon the world. It is not the proclamation of a great moral Being who designs to raise His creatures out of their sensual and natural degradation; who reveals to them not merely that He is, but what He is — why He has created them — what they have to do with Him. Unless this mighty chasm in the Mahometan doctrine can be filled up, it must 'wither day by day — wither for all purposes of utility to mankind ; it can leave nothing behind but a wretched carcase, filling the air with the infection of its rottenness. For, secondly, see how that which gave all the dignity and glory to this system becomes, from its want of some other element, the very cause of its degradation. The absolute government of the unseen Being had presented itself to the Mussulman, in every age, in the absolute, visible government of his caliph or sultan. While the divine feeling was strong and alive, the subjection to LECT. I.] BLANKS IN MAHOMETANISM. 29 the human ruler was an affectionate, dutiful, entire submission. The ruler -was, in very deed, the centre of his warriors. He felt towards them as a protector, sharing their toils, bound to the same master, enduring hardships in the same cause. But the battle over, he becomes the absolute monarch in the midst of his seraglio — they are merely his slaves. There is no such connection between him and the being whom he wor- ships as permanently to check this tendency — to make the monarch feel that he is set over them to do them good, or the subjects that they have an appeal against him to a higher Ruler. The very nature of the Ottoman government — and that government is the perfect development of the Mahometan idea — excludes the possibility of orders and gradations in society. Its strength lies in all being simply subjects of the one ruler, holding their offices not in virtue of any hereditary ranks or privileges, but only at his pleasure. "When therefore the one principle which quickened the whole society waxes feeble, of necessity it becomes the most intolerable of despotisms. Elsewhere there is a balance and conflict of powers, which even in the dreariest periods produces struggles or paroxysms of life ; here, if the monarch do not inspire his people with strength, all is dead. And the same cause which destroys what may be called the family bonds of civil society, destroys equally the family itself. Polygamy is no accident of Mahomet- anism : a careful consideration of the system will show 30 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. that it must fall to pieces the moment any reformer shall attempt to remove this characteristic of it. But again, the first principle of Mahometanism wanting the support of some 'other which it does not acknowledge, must change, and is continually changing, into one which is the counterfeit and direct opposite of itself. The belief of a living, acting Will passes into the acknowledgment of a dead necessity, a Fate, against which there is no struggling, which drives the soul not to energy for some great object, but to indiffer-' ence, languor, and the submission that means despair. Oftentimes indeed the patience of a Turk must even yet awaken our homage and our shame. Joyfully would we confess that God has not suffered the true principle to be wholly extinguished by its bastard product. But we would draw from that confession not a pretext for leaving this, or any feeble and beautiful plant of a better soil, to the hot-bed which has always impeded its growth, and now threatens to stifle it altogether ; but a certain hope that it is intended to receive culture from without, and that, by help of that culture, it may yet blossom and bear fruit abundantly. These remarks may prepare us to take notice of one great fact in the history of Mahometanism, which is the connecting link between it and the other systems of which I propose to speak hereafter. I have talked of the victories of the Crescent in different quarters of the globe, and it is not easy to LECT. I.] ITS VICTOEIES NOT COMPLETE. 31 exaggerate the greatness of those victories. Yet we all know they were not complete ; they did not exterminate that which they were meant to exterminate. I do not speak now of the resistance which this great power encountered from the hammer of the Mayor of Paris, or from the heroes in the Asturian mountains. I do not speak of anything which is directly connected with Christianity. I mean that the most remarkahle of the old polytheistic faiths, though crushed, were not cast out ; that some of the countries which yielded to Mahometans are not Mahometan. It behoves us to inquire into the meaning of this fact — to ask ourselves, what there was in their doctrines, compounded of all strange elements, sanctioning so many fearful crimes, for which the simple and purer Mahometan faith could provide no satisfaction. We may find that convictions which the Mahometan trampled down, do as much require recognition as those which he enforced; that man has demands for himself which will not be satisfied by being told that he is the servant of an absolute Will — demands which must, somehow or other, find their explanation, must in some way or other be reconciled with that great truth. I will not anticipate the nature or the results of that inquiry; but I hope we may gather something from the one in which we have been engaged. You have found a set of men brought up in circumstances altogether different from yours, holding your faith in abhorrence, who say in language the most solemn and 32 THE RELIGIONS OE THE WORLD. [part i. decisive, " Whatever else we part with, this is needful I to us and to all human beings — the belief that God IS — the recognition of Him as a living personal Being.' You have seen this faith growing weak for a time, and everything else growing weak with it ; you have seen it re-appearing, finding a new set of champions to assert it, compelling nations to bow before it. Be sure that here is something which the heart and reason within you have need of — which they must grasp. Be quite sure, that if you give them in place of it any fine, notions or theories; if you feed them with phrases about the beautiful or the godlike, when they want the source of beauty, the living God ; if you entertain them with any images or symbols of art or nature when they want that which is symbolised ; if you talk about physical laws when you want the lawgiver, of mechanical properties when you want him who set them in motion, of secret powers when you want him who acts by them and upon you, you are cheating yourselves — cheating mankind. Remember further, that the acknowledg- ment of this Being may imply much more than the Mahometan perceived, but that it does imply that which he perceived. If such an One is, His will imust be the law of the universe. Every creature in jthe universe must be in a right or wrong position, Imust be doing his work well or failing in it, as he [yields himself to this will, or as he resists it. And let us not fancy that the early Mahometan was entirely mistaken as to the way in which this will ought to be LECT. I.] ITS LESSONS. 33 obeyed. He may not have understood what enemies he had to fight with, what weapons he had to wield, ; but he did discover that the life of man is to be a continual battle, that we are only men when we are ! engaging in a battle. He was right that there is something in the world which we are not to tolerate, i which we are sent into it to exterminate. First of all, \ let us seek that we may be freed from it ourselves; ; but let us be taught by the Mussulman that we shall not compass this end unless we believe, and act upon the belief, that every man and every nation exists for the purpose of chasing falsehood and evil out of God's ^ universe. M. B. L. ^ 34 PAET I.— LECTURE II. Character of the Hindoo Faith. The Brahmin. Worship of the Pure Intelligence. The popular re-action. Vishnu and Siva. Relations of the English Oovernment to Hindooism. rriHE remarks which I made at the close of my last -"- Lecture will prepare you to expect that I should speak in the present of Hindooism. That faith has been brought into conflict with Mahometanism, has succumbed to it, and yet has maintained its ground, leaving the victorious religion the religion of a small minority. Though it may pretend to an antiquity Avhich it does not possess, it has certainly lasted three ^ thousand years. The language in which its holy books f are composed is the mother-tongue — if I may use that "^ phrase in its literal, rather than its ordinary sense — of i the Greek, the Latin, and the dialects of our Gothic -^ ancestors ; consequently, of nearly all which are spoken in Western Europe at this day. From this fact it might, I think, be inferred, if other evidence were wanting, that the mythologies of these nations could be traced to an Indian source. But there is abundant evidence, so much as to have misled those scholars who were first struck with it into a forgetfuiness of the important historical principle, that we cannot determine the character of nations, or of their belief, merely by LECT. II.] IMPORTANCE OF HINDOOISM. 35 finding tlie point from which they started; that each must be studied in itself, and in its own ■ utterances, and that we gain only a secondary aid in our investiga- tions when we have the means of affiliating it to some other. That this mistake was committed by some of the great Orientalists of the last century, I think is now generally acknowledged ; they seemed to suppose that they could learn more of the Greeks from San- scrit books than from their own. But an extravagance which is natural to all discoverers does not make the discovery itself less valuable ; in fact, we are only beginning to appreciate its importance. The more practically we learn to sympathise with our fellow-men in all countries and in all ages, to cultivate such sympathy for our own sake and for theirs, and for the glory of God, the more will all such hints respecting the relationship between different nations be reflected on and prized. And this remark suggests another and much Aveightier reason, why a Boyle Lecturer should address himself to the subject of Hindooism, and why we all should take an interest in it. It is the faith, to pi>yv- . say the least, of between eighty and ninety millions ^-y^ of people, subjects of the British Empire. By conquests £T^ scarcely paralleled for rapidity in the annals of the world, we have obtained supremacy over them, and by civil policy we have tried to preserve it. As to the right character of this policy there has been the greatest variety of opinion ; but I think intelligent men are now well agreed, that, whatever it be, it must be grounded 36 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [paet i. upon a knowledge of the character, institutions, faith of the people who are to be influenced by it. Civilians, military officers, and missionaries in India, have exerted themselves to acquire this knowledge, and to make it available for us. Their theories, as well as their facts, when they seem most contradictory, are "worthy of study and of comparison ; they may all help us in find- ing the principle of Indian life and belief, and that princip].e, when we apprehend it, may make the dififer- ences in their observations and opinions more intelligible. There are, unquestionably, considerable difficulties in the investigation. This ancient people is strictly speaking without a history. "No date of a public event," — I use the words of Mr. Elphinstone,— " can be fixed before the invasion of Alexander ; no connected relation of the national transactions can be attempted until after the Mahometan conquest." Yet it would seem that we were in the greatest need of such records to connect the phenomena which offer themselves to the eye of the traveller in this day with the early books which are still regarded with the profoundest veneration. A Hindoo will sometimes tell us in wild language that he acknowledges three hundred millions of gods ; he means, of course, that the number is in- definite, that any object or power in nature, any heroic man, may be a god. And those who trace Oriental extravagance in such a description, will, nevertheless, remember to have heard of various beings who are acknowledged objects of Hindoo adoration, — of Brahma LECT. II.] ITS APPARENT CHANGES. 37 the Creator, of Vishnu the Preserver, of Siva the Destroyer, of Indra, the Lord of the Elements, of the fearful goddess Devi, of the beautiful hero Krishna, and a multitude more. Yet learned and trustworthy critics, Asiatic as well as European, confidently afiirm that the ground of the Brahminical faith is Monothe- istic ; that One Being is assumed in the earliest of the sacred books to be the origin of all things ; that this was no lazy, inoperative tenet, but penetrated the whole system of worship, and the life of the worshipper. Putting such facts and such statements together, you might be ready to conclude that there was no real identity between the faith of one of these periods and of the other; that either by conquest, or some strange process of degeneracy, the character and feelings of the people had become so changed as to make the notion of one Hindoo or Brahminical religion a mere delusion. But many considerations will show us that this opinion, however plausible, is untenable. I have said that the early Vedas, composed, perhaps, fifteen hundred years before the time of Christ, be their tenets what they may, are still regarded with unbounded veneration by the religious men among the Hindoos. The Menu code or institute, which is probably about six hundred or seven hundred years younger than these, and which indicates some, though not radical, alterations of practice and opinion during the interval, must still be the great study of every English jurist who wishes to understand the grounds of Hindoo law 38 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. and life at the present day. Five or six centuries after the composition of this code the troops of Alexander crossed the Indus. The picture which the Greeks give us of society as they observed it, accords with that which we gain from the earlier native source ; but, what is still more to the point, it also accords in essentials with what our own countrymen tell us of India now. With the advantages we possess from the actual occupation of the country, from being able to examine parts of it which the Greeks never visited, and from modern habits of critical investigation, we must see many things much more clearly than they did;' and therefore, even when their reports are different from the present state of things, it is not necessary to assume that there must have been really a great change. It is hardly needful, however, to take this remark into consideration, for we are assured, by those who have the best opportunities of judging, that one of the most remarkable features of Hindoo life, the constitution and government of the villages, is exhibited with surprising faithfulness in narratives which were derived from observations made more than two thousand years ago. Such permanence in social habits would surely lead us to expect something corresponding to it in the inward convictions of a people ; and we are not left to conjecture. The soldiers of Alexander found a set of men whose great business was contemplation, who submitted to numer- ous privations and austerities that they might pursue LECT. II.] CHARACTER OP THE BRAHMINS. 39 it more effectually. The Brahmins they found were the leading class in the country; military, agricultural, commercial occupations were all subordinate to theirs — all society had, in fact, organised itself in con- formity with their ideas. The Greek fancied they had less to do with civil affairs than we know, from their own code, that they must have had. But the general conception which he formed of the Brahmins , was singularly accurate. He called them Sophists, v\!7'^ name which, in his own country, often denoted mere s , sceptics; here it had no such signification; it implied ^1^,$:, that the Brahmins were not merely priests, such as were to be seen elsewhere; that their first business was study, and that the purely sacerdotal office was secondary to this. As the accounts which the Greek writers give of the objects of Hindoo worship are meagre, and evidently distorted by the desire of finding resemblances to their own mythology, we might suppose that, for our purpose, we could not learn much from them. But I believe we shall find that their report of the Brahmins is, in fact, the key to the whole system ; one which, if we use it rightly, will enable us to discover its leading characteristics, and to understand, however little we may be able to trace, the varieties of form which it has assumed. The name of Brahmin at once suggests that of Erahm. The resemblance is no accidental one ; nor does it merely signify that the Brahmin is the minister or priest of Brahm. The connection is of a far more 1' 40 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. intimate and wonderful kind. The learned man, the contemplative sage, aspires to be one with him whom he adores — to lose his own being in his. And what is this being ? He is the Absolute Intelligence ; the Essential Light. Best, Contemplation: this is his glory, his perfection. You will feel at once the direct opposi- tion between this idea and that of the Mahometan. I bring it before you just at this point, that you may see how much we may impose upon ourselves by the word Monotheism, which is often used as if it were common to these two faiths, at least in their origin ; that you may see at the same time in what sense it has been honestly and rightly applied to Hindooism. Mahometanism began with a Prophet, but we saw the Prophet soon merged in the Khalif or Sovereign. The Sovereign was the organ of a mighty Will, which had called all things into existence, and of whom all men are servants. He fulfils his service in perpetual conflict; only in such conflict does his faith make his meaning intelligible. There are no natural gradations of society, no hereditary ranks ; aU are merely officers holding their position under the one ruler. The priest is an insignificant person. Strictly speaking, there is no priesthood. The dervish or learned man may be an important adviser of the Sovereign : in times of quiet he may promote learning, or become the head of a sect ; but when he is most regarded it is only as an interpreter of the Divine Will. The first principle of Mahometan- LECT. II.] GROUND OF THIS FAITH. 41 ism would be violated if he aspired to be himself divine. Here, on the contrary, the priest, the student, the beholder is judge, lawgiver, everything. The God is an Intelligence, not a Will — himself a higher priest — a more glorious student — a more perfect contem- plator. You can scarcely conceive a mandate issuing from such a being : all things must flow from him as light from the sun, or thoughts from a musing man. Such an idea is ever implied in Hindooism; but it may not have been frequently expressed ; it may sometimes have been contradicted, in the earliest stage ; for the rapt student, feeling it his highest calling and privilege to meditate on an Absolute Being in silence and awe, will have had such a practical reason for not confounding him with the world around, as no theoretical consistency could outweigh. It was far otherwise with the feeling of a relation between the Jmraan worshipper and the object of his adoration. This feeling was not resisted, but strengthened by his practical discipline. He was taught that he was intended to rise into the closest communion, nay, into actual identity, with the Divinity : to realise such a state was the effort of his existence. The Brahmin believed that there was in man a capacity for such intercourse or absorption as this; but surely not in all men. Some are merely animal : there must be a race intended for this high converse, there must be a race excluded from it. One would not say, however, that the highest sage is the only man 42 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WOELD. [part i. who is not merely animal. The warrior must have something of the higher diviner faculty; it may be cultivated and ripened in him. Even the merchant, the traveller into other lands, must be more than a merely earthly creature. These orders of men should be kept apart from the lowest of all — the mere human ^ animal, the Sudra. Yet the purely contemplative 8) ma,n should not be allowed too much intercourse even ^ with these. He may educate them to be such men I/, ' as they are meant to be, but he must keep himself -A and his race pure : this race must be carefully trained ^i to be the model of humanity — to rise above humanity ( y^by perpetual meditation on the unseen Brahm. The so-called laws or institutes of the Hindoos are all designed for this purpose. They are, properly speaking, a system of education or discipline ; a method of fitting the highest man for fulfilling his vocation, and all the others for preserving their proper rela.tion to him. The idea of a separation between the twice- born man and the merely animal man, is the funda- mental one; all the arrangements are for the purpose of giving effect to this idea — all other distinctions are secondary to it. The twice-born man must, by certain services or sacraments, the principal of which is read- ingr the Vedas, maintain his relation to the unseen object. He must practise certain plans for lessening his dependence on mere material gratifications ; he must cultivate rather the passive than the active qualities. In the progress of ages the two middle classes seem LECT. 11.] CASTES— THEIR ORIGIN. 43 to have disappeared, or at least this is the prevailing Brahminical opinion. The system has undergone other modifications, till at length, in some places at least, it has so adapted itself to the different pursuits and occupations of men, as to offer an excuse for the European notion, that it was invented in an early stage of society by some legislator, who observed that labour must be divided in order to be successful, and that there is likely to be an hereditary aptitude for particular professions or trades. Such a notion seems to be refuted by the fact that, according to the early arrangements of castes, there was no accurate division of employments; that persons of the same order were allowed to perform many which were unlike and in- compatible. Nor does another plausible hypothesis, that the Brahmins were a conquering tribe and the Sudras a conquered one, seem to be more tenable. Those who have the best opportunities for comparing them, say that they can discover no such differences between them as would warrant the supposition of their belonging to a different race, none greater than are naturally produced by meaner occupations and a sense of degradation during a long course of years. But the great objection to this opinion is, that the Sudras are uot in any sense slaves, and never can have been such; the Greeks were surprised to find all classes in India free citizens in some sense, in however low a one. So that probably we cannot get much further than the religious principle as the basis 44 THE RELIGIONS OF THE "WORLD, [part i. of the distinction^than the idea, I mean, that there is a tendency in men to become purely animal, and that there is a race of men in which this tendency is realised and perpetuated; that there is in man that which may be raised to fellowship with the Divine; and that there is a race in which this capacity is exhibited and transmitted. In spite then of the fact, that there are in the very earliest Hindoo Vedas prayers and hymns to light and fire, and to many natural powers, nay, though the liturgical part of them consists mainly of such prayers, we may fully admit the assertion, that the Brahmin is seeking after one Divine unseen object; that he is only asking these different creatures to tell him what that object is, and how He is to be found ; nay, that his aim in his whole life and discipline is to purify himself from outward, sensible things, that he may approach nearer to this one source of illumination. But then how can we explain the fact, that men setting this end' before them, looking upon the most mysterious powers in the universe as at best ladders to ascend to the highest region — ladders which the wise men could generally, in time, throw away — should have become so utterly entangled in sensible outward idolatry as the modern Hindoo seems to be? The explanation often given, that the ordinary gods are but the gods of the vulgar, that the learned man has altogether another view of them which he keeps to himself, is quite unsatisfactory. For the point we LECT. II.] CASTES— THEIR PRINCIPLE. 45 want to ascertain is this, how the Brahmin came to suppose that the divers and manifold beings of whom the Hindoo Pantheon consists, could be helps to the discovery or the presentation of the One .Being ; how he could possibly be induced to reverse the whole order and object of his studies and discipline; to in- troduce variety, that he might suggest the idea of unity; to bring in a host of visible forms, that he might lead his disciples more certainly to that which is beyond their senses. I do not deny the possibility of such a scheme, but the origin and the steps of it should be explained. If a modern Brahmin confesses that he attaches no importance to the things to which he seems to attach the greatest, we may accept his testimony against himself. Still more willingly we may believe one who says that he loves the simple faith which he thinks has departed, and that he will spend his life in efforts to restore it. But we cannot take the witness of either respecting their fathers. The process by which they arrived at one strange conclusion after another may have been as simple and natural a one as that by which their traditions are discarded, or that by which they are traced to a deliberate purpose of imposture. And this, I believe, is actually the case. While the Brahmin was learning, by various arts, to practise abstraction of spirit ; was searching, by various helps, to arrive at the perception of the Perfect One; he felt that the light, the intelligence which entered into 46 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. [paet i. his own heart — that which raised him above his fellows • — that which enabled him to see mysteries, must be the great expression of the Divine Being. Brahm becomes Brahma; the light which flows from the source of light, the wisdom, which comes from the fount of wisdom, is that which declares him— this is his Name. In that character the initiated disciple is to worship him : no sacrifices need be offered to him, no temples need be raised to him. It is the inward and purified intellect which does him homage. A very sublime conception, you may be inclined to say; one which it is no wonder that enlightened Brahmins in our day should wish to reproduce. But imagine yourselves in the school where this sublime doctrine was taught ; look at the self-satisfied, self-glorified person who is proclaiming it ; see how he has gone on, step by step, till, from a profound idea of some awful, absolute Being, he has passed into the habitual conviction that this Being is himself; he has become his own God. Mark what contempt he manifests for persons about him, what utter in- humanity has grown out of this notion that he is the very perfection of humanity, that he is above it. Suppose an earnest, enthusiastic disciple, struck with the contradiction, saying to himself, " Is this the devout, the self-losing, absorbed Brahmin whom I was taught to wonder at — whose teaching at first seemed to me so sublime ? " In the tumult of his feelings, in the sadness of his disappointment, he goes forth LECT. II.] THE REFORMER— VISHNU WORSHIP. 47 from the school into Nature. What a change he - '^ finds there ! What a sense of refreshment, freedom^,"' ^ calmness, penetrates through his whole being ! Surely '>{>'> he has been living till this time in a close, pent-up atmosphere, thinking only of himself; ever hoping, and hoping in vain, to find his God in himself But is he not here ? What a wonderful order there is through this wide universe ; an order of day and night ; of seasons of heat and seasons of rain ; an order in the planets over our heads; an order in the growth of the flowers at our feet; an order in the overflowings of the mighty river. Yes, his name is the Preserver ! Conceive of him under that name — o worship him under that name — call him Vishnu : bid ^ men rejoice that they have such an One caring for 'KV them. The name, perhaps, had been known before in the Brahminical school. It had been one thought among many, that Brahma was the preserver of things : now it becomes the name. Hundreds of hearts are ready to welcome it: even the poor Sudra can look up, and feel that it has a sound of blessing to him. And now the older worship becomes, comparatively, obsolete; the young reformer has prevailed. The Brahminical order must take up his doctrine, and proclaim it, and reconcile it as they can with that which they held before : if they do not so, a sect of Vishnu worshippers will form themselves — men will go out into the deserts and proclaim this faith, without respect to the laws of family or caste at all. 48 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. In some such way as this, I conceive, the popular "Vishnu worship may have supplanted the original Brahma worship. It would be surely hard to say that the alteration was in itself for the worst ; yet the effect of it must, undoubtedly, have been to withdraw the idea of divinity from the inner sanctuary in which it had dwelt; to bring it forth into the world. Then temples would be raised, the fruits of the world offered, with songs and symbols, to the great Preserver. But ~^ soon there will have been a fearful re-action against this kind of service. How could the mere feeling of a beneficent Guardian of the Earth help men who were tormented with a sense of inward evil? What was there in such a Being at all corresponding to the dark visions which continually rose before them, whether they looked behind or before, to, the past or the future? But was there nothing in Nature which did correspond to these inward agonies, which seemed to be the very echo of them ? Were there no frightful floods and earthquakes — was there not a continual process of destruction going on in the universe ? Is not death the mighty king to whom all must do homage ? Poor worshippers of Vishnu, how miserably you are striving to hide the realities of the world from your eyes — to strew garlands over the grave ! You have never yet dared to pronounce the real name : it is Siva the Destroyer. If you know your own state, and what you have to fear, you will invoke that name— you will propitiate that divinity. And LECT. II,] THE DESTROYER— THE DELIVERER. 49 do not think to approach him with such oblations as are signs of plenty and gladness. It is blood he craves for ; the blood of your children and of yourselves. No sacrifices but these can appease his wrath, or abate the misery which he is sending to you, and designing for you. Here was another deep conviction working in the heart of the Hindoo, and destined to produce the most fearful fruits, from generation to generation. The Brahmin could not allay it — could not reduce it ^.^.'^ under his old notion of the Brahm a, the one celestial ^ ' Intelligence, who spoke only in the Wise. The Siva a sect rose up in fierce antagonism to the Vishnu sect. ^ '^ He must endeavour to bring the differeut ideas into ^ ^ ^^ reconciliation ; to assign the Brahma, the Yjshnu, the 0- Siva^ each a part in the arrangement of Nature, and in the different ages of the universe. Religious books are composed, some with the Vishnu, some with the Siva element predominant in them; the former with a gracious, the latter with a stern forbidding aspect ; the first not denying the dark principle — only keeping it in the back-ground ; the latter doing homage to the Preserver, but confessing the greater might of the Destroyer. Soon the unsatisfied heart feels another necessity. If it be true (and can it be denied ?) that the Power which divides and annihilates has such a direct in- fluence over the destinies of the world, may not the Preserver yet have somewhere an undisturbed reign; and may he not descend from that region, at certain M. B. L. -^ 50 THE RELIGIONS OE THE WORLD, [part i. periods, to claim his rights over this earth too — to create again that which has perished ? Is there not a principle of Eestoration implied in Preservation ; I nay, in Destruction itself? The animals die, but the 'T^ race survives : and have there not been in the ages ):lof man periods of deepest calamity, when all things "O seemed to sink in utter ruin, followed by bright sunny .,h' days — the earth coming forth out of darkness into p^ light ? These must have been the times of Vishnu's , ' ' descent. The animals, we have been told, all exhibit ;l^'some side or aspect of the divinity; may have been, ^ originally, portions of it. In these he may have ^' appeared. Men may have been able, without becom- p ing absorbed, to behold him, and converse with him. i^T Again, the priest will partly have led the popular conviction, partly have been led by it. He will have arranged the number and method of these Vishnu p \incarnations, reducing dreams to a system, and sanc- tioning the hope that there might be an avatar, which should restore all things. But these dreams were not sufficient. Was not a kind and gracious Rajah who felt for his poor subjects one in whom the Divinity was more likely to manifest himself, than in any of those creatures, however sacred, of which man is practically the master ? Have we not always felt that a man was permitted, in some mysterious way, to contemplate the Divine Being — to become one with him? Why may not He in such a form, so much more beautiful than any other, appear LECT. II.] THE OLD FAITH AND THE NEW. 51 to us? The briglit Krishna becomes the centre of innumerable legends. He is felt to be the true form of the divine Deliverer. As other dreadful apparitions rise up beside Siva, and claim the kind of worship which is offered to him — as there comes forth even a Kali to be a patroness of murder, to make strangling a virtue; this image of a friend and protector of the helpless is the more eagerly sought after, and delighted in. At each step in this process more of the forms and images of outward nature will have been called in, to express the conception of which the heart was full ; at each step the theoretic man will have been obliged to incorporate new schemes of the universe, new specula- tions upon all questions — astronomical, geological, physiological, metaphysical — into his theology, in order to connect the later and more popular outgrowths of it with the original root. Nevertheless, it is certain that, amidst all these definite conceptions and idolatrous forms, the primary Idea of an Inconceivable, Absolute, Unseen Being, whom it is the highest glory of the holiest man to behold, and in whom he is to be lost, has survived — survived not as a theory of some learned Brahmin, but as so deep and essential an article of popular faith, that all other habitual convictions, nay, the reverence for the Brahminical order itself, which seems worked into the very tissue of Hindoo society, must give place to it. Keligious orders, formed without any reference to distinction of castes, shall be followed 52 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. and reverenced in proportion as this seems to be the end of their existence : the perfectly abstracted Yogi shall be looked upon as greater, because in the way to a higher knowledge, than he who can explain all the order of nature. In fact, in the worst form of what may be supposed modern corruptions we may trace the original feeling at work. The woman who gives up herself to death on her husband's funeral pile, is exhibiting the same deep sense of the necessity of self-abandonment, self-sacrifice, which is implied in the desire of the con- templative man to be absorbed into the Divine Essence. We have, then, a faith presented to us here, which the more we think of it, the more fairly we consider its apparent anomalies, the more light we receive respect- ing it from different and contradictory reports, the more heartily and affectionately we sympathise with the feelings of our fellow -men, the more we know of our- selves, will awaken in us the more of reflection, and wonder, and awe. It is the faith not of savages but of men in whose minds respect for learning has occupied all but the highest place ; men whose whole common- wealth is modelled upon the notion, that the seer, the learned man, ought to be at the head — that all other people should look up to him. At the same time, these learned men have not been able to devise a belief at their pleasure for those whom they have governed. Strong necessities have come forth out of the heart of the people, demanding satisfaction — compelling the wise men to remould their system, yet recognising the worth ^ LBCT. II.] HINDOOISM APART FROM ITS THEOLOGY. 53 i • ■ ■ ^ and reality of that higher, older principle, which they ^r seem to set at nought. I do not think it would be ^^ ~^ o en ft easy to find a fairer test of those assertions respecting f ^ the religions of mankind which I propose to examine. 'o^ Tiie first of them — that there are deep truths implied {^ ^ in each of these systems — receives, it seems to me, t ^ abundant confirmation from even the hasty glance we S^ ? have been able to take of Hindooism. In the midst of ^ pi the extravagances and horrors which the most favour- ) , ^ able testimonies prove it to have brought forth, and /^ "^ which have multiplied, not diminished, as it has expanded, we have been able to trace some convictions so sacred, so bound up in the heart of the people for [ thousands of years, as to sustain the credit of monstrous I fictions, to make tormenting practices endurable ; con- | victions which have been able to create and perpetuate a complicated form of society, and to defy the power of victorious invaders. But it is affirmed next, that these deep convictions will in time disengage themselves from the theological element in which they dwell ; that theology being only an inadequate attempt to explain the phenomena of the universe. Now, I have been careful that you should notice how much of the Hindoo system is an attempt to explain the phenomeiiaof the^jiruverse ; it was scarcely necessary for me to remark how ineffectual a one. But, if you have followed the course of my observations, still more if you have made observations for yourselves, you will, I think, be convinced that y 54 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part i. these theories about the world are especially the non- ^•c^ theological element of the system ; precisely that which ^~y^ has been added to the theology, and become a part of it, in consequence of the inability of the Hindoo to distinguish between God and the world. His inward convictions, from first to last, have had reference to the Absolute, Unseen God, and to his relations with man. The drapery of these convictions has been his doctrine about Nature. Nor can that idolatrous, degrading, often filthy drapery ever be cast away, unless it can be shown him that the theological riddles, for which he has been seeking a solution in Nature so long and not finding it^which are bound up with the deepest wants of his heart — can receive that explanation some- where else. But, most of all, the notion that all ideas respecting an unseen world are produced by the religious faculty in man, might seem to receive countenance from the Hindoo records. How active that faculty has been, what words it has called into existence, whilst there were no outward transactions to relate or no one to relate them, we have seen. The Hindoo, in action the idlest, is in ima gining, dream ing^ jiombining, the most busy._of_airTumanj3rea;bures^ But is this all we have learnt ? Have we not found also an assurance in the mind of these people that all the efforts of thought in them must originate in a communication from above, and require fresh communications to meet them ? In the thinking, or reasoning, or religious faculty, call it LECT. II.] THE RELIGIOUS FACULTY. 55 what you will — or, as I should say, in the man's own heart, in his inmost being — have arisen desires and longings after converse with the unseen world, with some living being in that unseen world, with some one between whom and himself he feels there is a relation. His religious books echo the cry; they mutter a half- response to it : but the response is only the question thrown into a more definite form. The highest student meditates on the problem, and repeats his own thoughts; or more probably, what some ancient person, who medi^ tated and conversed with the Divinity, said about it ; or^ what some other said that he said. The circle is a very weary one ; if we calmly consider it, and what kind of comfort those receive who are ever revolving in it, we shall confess that the Hindoo is right in his belief, that the wisdom of which he sees the image and reflection must speak and declare itself to him ; that he cannot always be left to grope his way amidst the shadows which it casts in his own mind, or in the world around him. I ask nothing more than the Hindoo system and the Hindoo life as evidence that there is that in man which demands a Revelation — that there is not that in him which makes the Revelation. I ask no clearer proof of the fact, that whenever the religious feeling or instinct in man works freely, without an historical revelation, it must beget a system of priestcraft. It must be satisfied by God, or overlaid by man, or stifled, altogether. The question still remains : Is the help to this statsi 56 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. of things to come from within the system ? I hinted that there are, or have been, Hindoo patriots who have dreamed of bringing back the first state of Brahminism, setting up tlie Monotheism of the older Vedas, sweep- ing away the accumulations of centuries. But if the original Brahminism itself contained the great puzzle of all subsequent ages ; if the Monotheism of the Vedas admitted the doubt whether man, nay, whether all things might not be a part of the Divinity; if those accumulations of centuries were the inevitable results of anxieties which men could only quell by destroying themselves^ it seems somewhat unreasonable to go back to the beginning of a series, every step of which, so far as we can tell, would have to be repeated. Or, if the notion be that some form of Monotheism, not in- volving the idea of direct connection between God and Man, or God and Nature, might supersede the existing superstition, is it not playing with words to speak of this as a revival or restoration ? must it not be simply a denial of the fundamental principle of the whole system ? We need not, however, enter upon this subject at present, for both these experiments have been made under every possible advantage. Buddhism, a doctrine, to which I hope to devote a separate Lecture, may, at least under one of its aspects, be regarded as a formal effort to revive the original Brahminical idea ; an effort not without very important results, which have affected a large portion of the world ; but which has not dis- placed Hindooism on its proper soil, and which, I think, LECT . 11.] CAN THE OLD FAITH BE EESTORED ? 57 we shall find is scarcely the doctrine any modern Hindoo reformer would desire to produce. To the other experiment I have alluded already— it is that of Mahometanism. A considerable number of the Hindoo race were converted to this faith, and profess it to this day. But it could take no hold of the heart of the people, for it solved no one difficulty which was perplexing them ; it affirmed a truth which staggered them, and before which they bowed ; one, however, which in this form coalesced with scarcely any con- ditions of their intellectual or of their moral being. Whether Christianity can do for the Hindoo what these systems have not done, is a question for our future consideration. One or two remarks I would make here which may remove some difficulties from that inquiry and which seem to arise naturally out of the present subject. I cannot feel surprise that the statesmen and scholars of British India, observing the failure of the Mahometans to overthrow the faith and institutions of this strange people, should have pressed strongly upon their own government the duty of respecting what it had not power to subvert. I cannot believe that an indifference to evils which were continually before their eyes, or a feeling that the safety of English dominion is the highest of all considerations, can have induced men often of the greatest cultivation and humanity to protest against the efforts which some of their coun- trymen were making to spread the faith of Europe in the East. It is much pleasanter, and surely more 58 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. reasonable, to believe tbat tbey felt tbere was something hardhearted, almost impious, in trampling upon con- victions which had struck root into the soil for many- thousand years, which had created the whole fabric of society. For such a feeling one is bound to entertain the greatest respect ; only I think men generally so clear-sighted must by this time have perceived that there was an important oversight in the inference which they drew from it. No doubt it is a very serious thing to assault the belief, even the prejudices, of any ancient people. But this assault had already been made; every circumstance which brought English- men into contact with the Hindoo was a repetition of it. When all nature is peopled with divinities it does not require an adverse theologian to wound the pre- judices of the worshipper, — the army commissary, the judge, the ordinary traveller, must interfere with them continually. Above all, when it came to be perceived, as it would of course be in time perceived by any benevolent government, that Englishmen ought not to be settled in a country without communicating to its inhabitants some portion of that knowledge which they possess, or rather, when it was found that a people so eager for information, so quick in receiving it, as the Hindoos, would not be content until they had learnt the secret of our mechanical achievements, — it was certain that some cherished tenet must be outraged, some express statement in the religious books contra- dicted, if the teacher of European science should advance LECT. II.] DANGER OF THE HINDOO FAITH. 59 beyond his alphabet. Such considerations do not prove that the idea of respecting a people's convictions is a false one; they show" only that there are certain accidents of these convictions which we are not only permitted, but obliged, to make light of. Just in proportion to that necessity which is laid upon us for showing the Hindoo that visible things cannot be treated with the reverence which he has been taught to feel for them, should be our desire and determin- ation to preserve him from the danger to which he is certainly exposed, of thinking that all the question- ings of his fathers respecting the invisible world had no purpose or meaning. These questionings belong to the most radical portion of the Hindoo mind ; in them you see what the Hindoo is, what his existence means, and how he has been able to stamp such an image of himself upon society. To these questionings he owes the activity of his intellect and imagination when all his other tendencies and his outward circumstances would make him indolent ; hence have arisen his love of letters and his desire for science. But the time has evidently come when he cannot be questioning merely ; he must have answers. I contend that he who is able to give them is not a destroyer, but a preserver : that he will have a right to boast of having upholden all that was strongest and most permanent in the Hindoo life and character, while English influ- ences in general were, however innocently and inevit- ably, threatening to undermine them. I concede with 60 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD., [parti. equal readiness, that if Christianity do not offer these answers, it cannot make this boast; it must leave to some other instrument th'e work of regenerating Hindostan. As the question is brought to this test, let us gather up in a few words the enigmas which have tormented the Hindoo so long, and of which, for the sake of his practical life, he demands a solution. First, he has had the deepest assurance that God must be an Absolute and Living Being, who can be satisfied with nothing less perfect than himself; and yet he has an equally deep conviction that this Absolute and Eternal Being cannot merely live in self-contem- plation; that there must be some object in which he sees his image reflected. The thought is expressed with great earnestness and beauty in one of the early Vedas, where Brahm is introduced seeking for the image of himself The words which are imputed to him express the strong feeling, that a merely solitary, self-seeking, abstracted being would be one whom a man, experiencing his own need of sympathy and fellow- ship, could not bear to contemplate. The thought ex- pands itself through the whole Hindoo mythology. It utters itself from the beginning in the idea of a Brahma, as well as a Brahm ; it gives birth to all the later notions of goddesses dwelling beside the gods. If no voice comes from the secret place to interpret this mighty contradiction which the learned man has perceived, which the most ignorant Hindoo feels, their thoughts of God and their human life must continue a hopeless maze. LECT. II.] THE BRAHMIN AND SUDEA. 61 For the perplexity which grows out of this hes close to personal, as well as social, existence. May not man himself be this partner of the Divinity ? If he is, what means that deep assurance of a Divinity retired within the sanctity and awfulness of his own nature ? — If he is not, what mean these yearnings in the spirit after the knowledge of him ; this promise in the heart that it may be attained ; this discontent while it is wanting ? It is an idle thing to cut this knot by affirming either prin- ciple and denying the other ; all confusions, theoretical and practical, of the Hindoo arise from the attempt to do this, and from the experience of its impossibility ; only if you can show that they have been reconciled, and how, will you lead him to any clearness or freedom. Again, man has this glorious faculty; but a portion of men seem without it. It must dwell in a caste ; the rest must be cut off from it. Leave this thought to work, and it will bring forth the fruits which it has brought forth hitherto. The modem Hindoo, with his European culture and science, will be just as contempt- uous to all who want his information and intellect as the Brahmins of old ; the twice-born notion may change its form, in effect it will be as rampant and tyrannical as ever. You cannot extirpate it, until you justify it — until you can show that some eternal truth lies in the distinc- tion, and yet that it excludes no human creature ; that it asserts the common privilege of Brahmin and Sudra. Then we come to another set of questions — This Absolute Being, what manner of being is he ? If it 62 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. be true that he stands in some relation to us and the world, in what relation ? Is he benignant, or hateful ? is he a preserver or destroyer ? You cannot answer the question with any vague flourishes of rhetoric. The Hindoo is willing enough to acknowledge a kind and gracious ruler, but the worshipper of Siva meets you with a set of facts. Here is misery, here is death. You must encounter these facts — you cannot blink them. You must be able to say — "I can show that this misery and death do not interfere with the idea of a God of Order, Mercy, Love ; I can show it by practical tokens and demonstrations ; " otherwise you must leave the sects to fight on for ever, with a toler- able certainty that the darker will in general have the ascendency. Again, the idea of a struggle between life and death, order and disorder, good and evil, and of the victory having been achieved by the God actually descending into the battle-field, and himself taking part in the strife ; the idea that he must assume some form which is subject to all the accidents of earthly calamity; this is one which a European may easily scoff at, when he sees it presented to him in the Hindoo stories, and, doubtless, he will find many a learned Brahmin who is ready, with more or less reserve, to scoff too, nay, to represent such a notion as quite incompatible with the higher Brahminical theology. But let it be well considered that a stem demand of the popular conscience carries with it a very mighty witness ; if the learned order bows to that LECT. II.] PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED. es demand, allows the people to clothe their inward belief in their own shapes, and reduces their crudities to a system, we may be sure that the faith of the taught is stronger and more vital than that of the teacher; it may be grosser, but it must contain, at least, as real an element. Except this part of the Hindoo convic- tion can be recognised; unless it can be shown how the belief of such a divine descent is compatible with the highest idea any Brahmin can entertain of the divine perfection, or of man's spirit being intended to ascend to the apprehension and participation of it; I cannot see how the Hindoo race can ever be perman- ently raised above its present degradation, or how that respect and justice, which have been so passionately demanded for the faith and institutions of centuries, can be practically rendered. Once more — It is, undoubt- edly, a right thing in a government to suppress, by actual edict and physical force, human sacrifices. The Roman, tolerant as he was of all polytheistic systems in the provinces, took this course in our own country when he was dealing with the practices of Druidical worship. But neither by this act, nor by establishing municipal institutions in Britain, nor by building and encouraging the natives to build baths and porticoes and temples, did he provide any real substitute for those dark, mysterious thoughts of the unseen world which had haunted the mind of the Celt under his oaks, and which found a fearful expression in the sacrifices of children or of men. Those thoughts were 64 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WOELD. [part i. the stamina of the British heart; when an external civilisation expelled them, what remained was a feeble ' colony, groaning for help to the masters who could give it help no longer ; a colony which needed to have all its arts and polish destroyed by a people possessing some real faith, some inward strength, that the soil might, by this process, be prepared to bear genuine native fruits. It will be the same with Hindostan, if, while we put down the burnings of widows, and bestow a culture which makes such practices disgusting to its inhabitants, we are not able to show them what is the true form of self-immolation, and how wife, and maiden, and widow — how men, whether called to the contemplative or active life, may practise it. I know that I am asking no light thing of any faith when I say. All this it must do if it is to satisfy the heart and conscience of this Asiatic people. But let me ask you, before I conclude, whether a faith which does less than this can satisfy yoBI hearts and consciences ? We are in a world of action and energy and enterprise, more unlike that dreaming and specu- lative world we have been hearing of than the soil and climate of England are unlike those of Hindostan. And yet I will be bold to say it, the same thoughts which stir the spirit of the Indian sage and the Indian Sudra, are working secretly beneath all our bustling life, are affecting the counsels of statesmen, are entering into the 'meditations of the moralists and meta- physicians who most despise theology; in another XECT. II.] THE GREAT HUMAN QUESTION. 65 form, are disturbing the heart of the country peasant, and of the dweller in St. Giles's. They are such questions as these — What do we worship ? A dream, or a real Being? One wholly removed from us, or one related to us ? Is He a Preserver, or a Destroyer ? Has Death explained its meaning to us, or is it still a horrible riddle ? Is it still uncertain whether Life or Death is master of the world, or how has the uncertainty been removed ? What is the evil which I find in myself? Is it myself? Must I perish in order that it may perish, or can it be in any wise separated from me ? Can I give up myself and yet live ? What are these desires which I feel in myself for something unseen, glorious, and perfect? Are they aU phantasy, or can they be realised ? If they can, by what means ? Has He to whom they point made himself known to me ? How am I connected with Him? Must I utterly renounce all the things about me, that I may be absorbed into Him, or is there any way in which I can devote them and myself to Him, and only know Him the better by filling my place among them ? These are the great human questions; distance in time and space does not affect them; if we are not concerned with them it is because we have not yet ceased to be savages, or because we are returning, through an extreme civilis- ation, into the state of savages : if they do occupy us, we shall find that there can be but one answer to them for the Englishman and the Hindoo. PART I.— LECTURE III. Buddhism. Its m-igin and diffiision. Its various forms. The Laraa. Buddhism and its rivals in China. TN my former Lectures I have spoken of two religions, very opposite in their character, which have exercised an influence over a. large portion of the world— the Mahometan and the Hindoo. The former, we said, could only thrive when it was in action; the proper element of the other was rest. They were brought face to face in Hindostan. The Islamite triumphed, as might have been expected; but there was a passive strength in the Hindoo, which ultimately kept its ground, and enables him to say that his system has endured for three thousand years. I hinted that it had had struggles with a very different kind of enemy from the Mahometan — with a doctrine in many of its essential peculiarities like its own. That doctrine is- the Buddhist, the faith of Thibet, of Siam, of the Burmese Empire, of Cochin China, Japan, Ceylon; the popular, though not the j ) state, fai th of China. It is said to number above three hundred millions of people among its disciples; to be, therefore, by far the most prevailing religion which dges.,_existj-or_jev«j^4ias--e;si^tedj_in,,t^ It is surely, , then, deserving of earnest investigation ; LECT. III.] FORMS OF BUDDHISM. 6T there must be something in it which has given it this wide diffusion. It must express some necessities of man's heart, some necessities of our own. I propose, in the present Lecture, to inquire what these are ; to search for the main principle of Budd-. hism ; to consider in what relation it stands to those religions of which we have spoken ; lastly, to inquire how it is connected with two other systems which divide with it the Celestial Empire. A faith which is spread over such a number of countries, many of them very different from each other in outward circumstances, perhaps even in race and early cultivation, must present great varieties, which may seem to make the use of a common name rather a convenient refuge for our ignorance, than a proof that they have really any connection. Undoubtedly our information respecting the different forms of Buddhism is still very imperfect, and we have not the same means of correcting and enlarging it as in the case of countries which have fallen under our own dominion. Ceylon is, I believe, the only British pos- session in which pure Buddhism is professed. Never- theless, I am convinced that the intelUgent travellers and residents who have given us accounts of what they have seen or heard in the different countries T have enumerated, or what they have read in the books which these countries account sacred, have not been mistaken in believing that the fundamental doctrine is the same in all. The opposition between different 68 THE EELIQIONS OF THE "WORLD, [part i. views of the system, great as it is, admits, I think, of a tolerably easy explanation ; easy at least, if we do not merely look to find a meaning in the dry records of other people's notions or practices, but compare them with what we have felt and expeiienced in our own lives. The numerous phases, however, which the system assumes, make it very desirable that we should ascertain from what country it was derived, where we may seek for the first form of it. On this subject there is some, but, I think, now not much difference of opinion. The external arguments which induced Sir William Jones, and some eminent scholars of the last century, to suppose that its native seat could not have been Hindostan, have given way to later and fuller information. Therewas a stronger internal argu- ment, arising from a comparison of the Brahminical and Buddhist faith, which is also, it seems to me, untenable ; but which is well worth considering, and which at once connects the present subject with that of the last Lecture. We do not adequately describe the condition of Hindostan, by saying that the priests constitute its leading caste. The whole form of society has a sacer- dotal stamp upon it ; it has moulded itself in con- formity with a religious idea; not, as some have fancied, with a professional or mercantile one. And yet, when we look into the meaning of this system it explains itself, by the doctrine that there is in man a capacity for beholding the Unseen Being, and that there is in man an animal nature which admits of tECT. III.] BEAHM. 69 no Divine converse. The Brahmin is the leaxned, divine, absorhed man, the end of whose existence is to become one with Brahm. Brahm himself, I observed, was emphatically an Intelligence, a thinking, not a commanding being — One from whose thoughts all the universe has flowed out, not one by whose will it has been created. He is a higher priest, not in any sense a sovereign ; herein standing in the most direct contrast to the object of Mahometan worship. Between, then, the God and the worshipper there is the most direct affinity, which may become identity. Intelligence is to be the character- istic of both. The hereditary caste is to preserve this Intelligence ; its discipline to prevent it from being debased by mixture with people in whom the lower nature is predominant, or by contact with things which may make it predominant in themselves. Now that any set of men should arise in a society constituted like that of Hindostan, to deny the ex- istence of a special caste of priests, might not seem surprising ; for one might conjecture that there would be popular reactions against so very strict and exclusive a system. We saw that there had been such popular reactions in Hindostan. They took this form. They demanded a being less abstract than Brahm; not a mere thinking being, but one who should exercise actual influence over the arrangements of Nature and the world — one to whom its good or its evil might be ascribed — one who should not merely cultivate 70 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. intercourse with an absorbed devotee, but should enter into fellowship with human creatures in their ordinary condition. To such strong workings of popular feeling, to such cries of the popular heart, we traced the Vishnu and Siva worship, which the priests had been compelled to incorporate with that older principle it seemed striving to subvert. In these cases the priestly caste, whatever rude shocks it may have sustained, nevertheless kept its ground, even in the hearts of the people who assailed it. In fact, nothing proves more clearly than such changes, how much the rever- ence for a priestly order has been bound up with the sympathies and character of this nation. Neither the awakening of impulses which the priests could not control, nor conquest by such an utterly unsacerdotal people as the Mahometans, have availed to weaken this reverence. The priests have adapted themselves to feelings which they could not subdue ; their authority has waxed stronger by a doctrine which threatened to crush it and the popular faith together. But the Buddhist doctrine cannot in any wise be identified with this kind of movement. The word Buddha, it seems to be admitted on all hands, means Intelligence. That men ought to worship pure Intel- ligence, must have been the first proclamation of the original Buddhists. The deduction from this must have been, that no caste of priests was necessary for such worship. Could this doctrine have originated on the soil of Hindostan ? I do not wonder that LECT. III.] TWO CO-EXISTENT PRINCIPLES. 71 thoughtful persons, especially those whose experience made them aware of the facts I have just alluded to, should have said that it could not : that a theory so contrary to the tendencies of Hindoos from gener- ation to generation, must have come from some other region, and been rudely forced for a time upon this. But, plausible as such an hypothesis may seem, I think I have given you sufficient reason for distrusting it. The sacerdotal principle has indeed struck its roots very deep into the Indian soil, probably from as early a time as any to which we can look back. It has shown itself to be, in some form or other, inseparable from that soil. But it has grown up side by side with another principle, from which, at times, it is hardly distinguishable ; the reverence for human intelligence ; the disposition to make this the great Brahminical characteristic. It is quite conceivable, then, that from a very early time two sets of men may have co-existed in Hindostan; one composing an hereditary order of priests, the other a mere order of sages or devotees. They co-exist in India to the present day, on terms not probably of sympathy, but also not of absolute opposition or repulsion. The Greek writers allude to two classes seen by the soldiers of Alexander, between whom it has been reasonably enough supposed that a relation similar to this may have subsisted. Both will alike have aimed at converse with the pure Intelligence, absorption into him. Both there- fore will have been far removed from any wish to V2 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WOELD. [part i. substitute for this object of worship one of a more visible and earthly character. But different circum- stances may have operated to draw each of them into closer connection with that which is visible. The hereditary priest will have maintained his position by taking part in civil employments — will gradually have exhibited less of the higher and more abstracted, char- acter. The devotee will have been reverenced by the people for retaining and carrying out this character. Thus he will have been brought into greater sympathy with them; will have been induced to symbolise the object of his worship, that it might be more apparent to ordinary men. In this way, perhaps, we may account for the appearance of temples, possessing the characteristics of Buddhism, which must have existed in Hindostan from a very early period. Gradually the distinction between these classes will have become more marked and definite. Sages will have appeared calling upon men to adore Buddha in purity and sim- plicity, denouncing the hereditary caste, denouncing the books upon which they rested their pretensions, acknowledging a modified sympathy with the worship of the people as opposed to that of the Brahmins. In what light these sages were regarded we shall consider hereafter ; now it is only necessary to observe that there are the widest differences of opinion among Buddhists respecting the time in which the original sage, the first Buddhist teacher, flourished. That one Sakya Muni appeared in the sixth century before LECT. III.] ORIGINAL SEAT OF BUDDHISM. V3 Christ, who produced an efifect upon the inhabitants of India of the kind I have just described, and that he left a series of successors, seems to be ascertained. But he was in all probability only the rekindler of feelings which had been existing previously; only the person who formally set them in opposition to the Brahminical tendencies with which they had been hitherto, though by somewhat loose and fragile links, associated. Although, then, I would by no means support a paradox which has had some countenance from learned men, but not from the most learned or those who have examined the subject most, that Buddhism was the original doctrine, of which Brah- minism was a depravation; though such an opinion has to struggle with the greatest opposition of out- ward facts, and is, I think, also quite inconsistent with the respective character of the two systems : yet I ' imagine we must look upon Hindostan as the place from which both have started, must assume that they were branches from the same root, and that their separation, however decided at last, was a slow and gradual work. Ultimately the systems did come into direct collision, and it became evident that they could not dwell together on the same soil. The Brahminical succeeded in expelling its rival from Hindostan, and it went forth to seek and to find an asylum first in one, then in another of those numerous Asiatic countries which it now claims as its own. This view of the origin of Buddhism may be a 74 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. great help, I think, in reconciling the very opposite reports of it which we obtain from those who have seen it in different, or even in the same, localities. The extreme Polytheism of India we found was not so incompatible with what was said of its original Monotheism, as it appeared at first. But what are we to say of a doctrine which is sometimes represented as one of almost perfect Theism ; sometimes as direct Atheism ; sometimes as having the closest analogy to what in a Greek philosopher, or in a modern philo- sopher, would be called Pantheism ; sometimes as the worship of human saints or heroes ; sometimes as alto- gether symbolical; sometimes as full of the highest abstract speculation ; sometimes as vulgar idolatry? Strange as it may seem, the same doctrine is, I believe, capable of assuming all these different phases ; no one of them can be thoroughly understood without refer- ence to the other. Each is very imperfectly denoted by the names which I have used ; for the feelings, good and evil, which work in the hearts of human beings, can never be satisfactorily expressed by mere labels describing a notion or theory. I. Thus, to begin with the first supposition. Budd- hism is, as we have seen, an attempt at the highest, least material idea of divinity. Buddha is clear light, perfect wisdom. You must not try to conceive of him as doing anything. Eest is not so much his attribute as his very essence. He is One, the One ; and it is only with the inward eye, purged from sensual corrup- LECT. III.] THE BUDDHIST'S BELIEF IN GOD. 75 tions, and steadily fixed on the contemplation of unity, that he can in any wise be apprehended. For the natural eye of the ordinary man views a multiplicity of things, each thing divided and separate from the other. The natural eye takes account only of appear- ances; it requires the severest discipline for a man to behold the Eeality, This is surely Theism in its highest form and conception. It is something much more than we are wont to mean by that word, for by a Deist or Theist we often describe a person who does not deny, the existence of God; who admits it as a sort of ultimate fact, as the Hercules' pillar of the universe. But to the Buddhist, the belief in God is the most awful, and at the same time the most real of all thoughts; one not thrust back into the corner of a mind which is occupied by everything else, but which he thinks demands the highest and most refined exercise of all the faculty that he has. It is something which is to make a change in himself, which is at once to destroy him and to perfect him. And the effect is a practical one. Buddha is ever at rest. Can his worshipper be turbulent? Can he admit any rude or violent passions into his heart? He must cultivate gentleness, evenness, all serene and peaceful qualities, reverence and tenderness to all creatures, or he is not in his rightful state. He is not tempted, or obliged, as the Brahmin is, to look upon any human creature as merely animal, as excluded even from the highest privileges. He denies the natural difference of the Y6 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. Sudra ; the poorest man of the vilest race may become one with Buddha. Hence, though he belongs to no priestly family, all his functions are more essentially those of a priest than the Brahmin's can be. He claims no civil distinction; he is to be reverenced simply as offering up prayers for the peace and pro- sperity of all other people. He must abstain from much speech. In silence he may best hope to know the Unseen Intelligence. This is one aspect of the doctrine, and surely a very interesting one. II. But if the Buddhist sage asks himself, "What is it that I am contemplating : I cannot see it, or hear it, or handle it; I dare not conceive it; it is altogether inconceivable, and yet I know of it only by this mind of mine : " he is likely to find himself in a strange perplexity. Or, if he puts the case thus to himself: "The end I propose to myself is to become absorbed, lost, that is to say, nothing. Can it be Something which is to work this result? Can it be Something I am contemplating ? " He must say at length " No, it is Nothing. Nothing must be the ground of my life, of my being — of the being of all the things I see ! " Here is Atheism ; a deep, hopeless void, yet touching on the borders of that doctrine which implied real belief in a living Divinity. The transition to such Atheism is, no doubt, possible in the Brahminical doctrine ; but here it is much easier. For the existence of a continuous caste preserves the tradition of a Divinity, invests it with a reality in LECT. III.] THE BUDDHISM TRIAD. some sense independent of the mind of the beholder. Here all rests upon that mind. The light seems to be projected from the eye ; now it may be a bright sun in the heaven; now it may shrink into a speck; now it may vanish altogether. Yet we should draw a wrong inference from the incapacity of the Buddhist in this state of mind to give any form to his belief, if we said that it is wanting. He may even declare in honesty, " I see nothing," and the words being the utterance of despair, not of triumph or satisfaction, may themselves contain a sure witness, even to himself, that there is that which no words or thoughts of his can com- prehend; an eternal absolute ground of all words and thoughts. III. And soon the Buddhist discovers an escape from this void of nothingness. He began with looking upon the One Intelligence as alone real ; all outward nature he discarded, as merely apparent. But the visible world claims its rights; he cannot disown it; he must, in some way or other, take it into his system. The Intelligence, therefore, the pure Buddha, must have a partner of his throne. It is Dharma ; the principle of Matter ; that out of which all things are formed. But these two powers. Intelligence and Matter, seem essen- tially opposite : if they are co-workers, how can they be reconciled ? There must be another power, Sanga, the mediating influence, which binds the informing mind to the dead formless thing upon which it works. This is nearly the explanation which a Buddhist priest 78 THE RELIGIONS. OF THE "WORLD, [part t: gave to the English resident at Nepaul of a subject which has occasioned much controversy. It is borne out by the symbols in the Buddhist temples. They seem contrived to express the idea of some active, productive power; of some passive, merely receptive power; again, of something which is the joint result of both. If we compare the Buddhist Triad with the Hindoo Triad of Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva, the Creator, Preserver, Destroyer, we are struck rather by their difference than their resemblance. The powers of preservation and destruction are militant powers; each is continually invading the kingdom of the other : Bramah is looked upon as the common origin of both. Here the Intelligent Power is considered as balancing, or sustaining, the Passive, Material Power; and a third as necessary to their fellowship. The latter idea is, I think, by far the deeper, and more suggestive; but then it is abstract, rather than personal; more of a philosophical speculation; less of a practical belief. And it leads very directly to the next side of Buddhism . — what is called its Pantheistic side. IV. Beginning with the notion that the Intelligence is entirely separated from the world — that He is One, and it multiform — the Buddhist may arrive, by a series of easy steps, at a conclusion which would seem most opposed to this, that the Intelligence is essentially one with the world : in fact, that it can only be considered as the informing life or soul of the world. As in the case of Brahminism, it may be rightly said that this LECT. III.] HUMAN BUDDHAS. V9 doctrine was latent in the Buddhist from the first : in other words, that the moment he began to think upon Nature with no other data than the belief which he possessed, he must inevitably terminate in this scheme. But it should be said at the same time that he has struggled earnestly, even heroically, with this tendency ; that his effort to contemplate the pure Essence in- dicates a genuine desire to see something above the world, not merely dwelling in it and actuating it. However true then it may be that Buddhism often becomes a mere notion of a God diffused through all things, I cannot believe that this is its characteristic principle. To ascertain what that is, we must examine the next allegation respecting it, that it is especially the deification of human saints or heroes. V. We can scarcely speak of this as a phase of Buddhism. Everywhere you will find certain human beings called Buddhas. You will find Europeans ask- ing such questions as these, "When was Buddha born 1 How many Buddhas are there ? And those who are asked seem not astonished at the inconsistency of the two inquiries, or of either with that idea of a pure essential Intelligence, sometimes the fixed only reality, sometimes so divested of all qualities as to become nothing, sometimes diffused through all things. If you consider the starting-point of the doctrine, you will see that the departure from it, which is involved in this notion of human Buddhas, is far less than it seems. The abstracted man was to become one with 80 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. tlie Divinity. In the mind of the Hindoo a whole caste is marked out for that glory. But a whole caste evidently does not attain it ; there must be immeasur- able differences of taste, earnestness, wisdom, in the priests of one generation, still more in those of success- ive generations. So it comes to pass, that there is much feeling of a divine character diffused through a great many ; not so much belief of actual divinity in particular individuals. Here, on the contrary, there is no check to the conviction that a man has risen to the state of Godhead — may be a God. In proportion as the Infinite Object fades into obscurity, or waxes fearful, the vision is more cherished of his appearance in some man, who in this or that period confers blessings on some particular country ; traverses different countries • now monnts into the regions where Indra the Lord of the Elements dwells — now descends to earth, like Vishnu ; (for these powers have passed from the Hindoo into the Buddhist legends ;) and leaves here and there, in some mountain or valley, footmarks which may be noted, and become the symbols of his continual pre- sence. For as he has moved through space, passing rapidly from one portion of the globe to another, so does he live through different periods of time, the same principle inhabiting various forms; the same Buddha, though there may have been a number of Buddhas — though they may appear even now. VI. And now we can understand how idolatry, the worship of different outward natural things, may be LECT. III.] SYMBOLISM OF SENSIBLE OBJECTS. 81 attributed to this Theistic, Atheistic, Pantheistic, Human Doctrine. Through all nature, above and beneath, Buddha has journeyed ; everywhere he has left his footmarks; everywhere we may find tokens of him. Sun, moon, and stars, all things on this earth, may speak of him. Or we may think of him as the fixed Immoveable Past, as the Actual Present, as the dim Future of fears and hopes. But these sensible objects are too distant and vague ; these Past, and Present, and Future, too abstract. And we want to feel that we are not contemplating them in themselves, or for their own sakes, but the living, quickening Intelligence which has stamped its form upon them. They must be changed into symbols; in that character we must approach them and revere them. Thej^ must assume shapes which are given to them by the kindred Intelligence in ourselves. Oftentimes these shapes will be animal; for how ought we to think of the creatures around us, with those half-human faculties and affections which we discover in them ; with the ferocity and cunning which are surely not peculiar to them? Must not they be inhabited by a human spirit in some degraded, fallen condition ? Are they not wandering about as signs to us of what we may become ; of that state to which, by cultivating the lower and baser qualities of our nature, we may reduce ourselves ? So reasons the Buddhist ; he reveres and fears the animals as meaner forms of that Intellect, of which he sees the highest form in the glorified man, the Buddha. M. B. L. Ct 82 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. VII. I have not yet spoken of Buddhism as a social system. I described its ministers as forming an ordev of devotees, so distinguished from a caste of priests. It is necessary to speak thus of them, for we must not suppose because they have no hereditary vocation, that they take their office at hazard, or that they have no communion with each other. We have a very accurate description of the ceremonies which are observed in some countries at their consecration, of the questions which are asked to ascertain that they have no bodily or mental disqualification for the task. Such cere- monies, though they may vary in their forms, exist wherever Buddhism exists. In Thibet, which must be i;egarded as the centre and proper home of the religion, the priests are called Lamas; it is they who decide who the Lama, the true high priest of the universe, at any given time is. I say they decide who he is ; for they could never allow that the faculty of choosing the chief Lama resides in them. In some person or other the spirit of Buddha dwells; he is meant to be the head of the universe ; to him all owe homage. This Lama, therefore, never dies; he is lost sight of in one form, re-appears in another. The body of some old man who has had this honour loses its breath, is laid in the tomb. The Lama has passed into some infant, who is brought up in a convent with special care, preserved from sensual influences, taught from the cradle to look upon himself as the shrine of the Divinity, and to receive the homage of LECT. III.] THE DIAGNOSTIC OP BUDDHISM. 83 rajahs, nations, even of the Celestial Empire ; nay, even of European monarchs. Some of you may re- member to have read of a solemn embassy sent by the English government at Calcutta, in the days of Warren Hastings, to the court of the Lama. A very affect- ing letter had been addressed by him to the English authorities in India, asking their help in checking quarrels between certain native sovereigns, an object, he said, which he sought diligently in prayers by day and night. An old man was the author, of this letter ; before Mr. Turner, the English envoy, arrived he had left the world; and a child of eighteen months was acknowledged as his successor. It reigned by no here- ditary right ; but the other Lamas presented him with unquestioning faith as the representative of the Perfect Intelligence through whom it would most surely utter itself. If we now try to sum up the evidence which we have gathered from different, indications respecting Buddhism, I do not know that we can do it better than in the words of Mr. Hodgson, the resident at Nepaul, to whom I have already referred. " The one infallible diagnostic of Buddhism," he says, with an emphasis and decision which were the result of patient inquiries, conducted during many years, " is a belief in the infinite capacity of the human intellect." This is the conclusion to which all our inquiries into the system have conducted us. The idea of an Adi Buddha or Absolute Eternal Intelligence, is there, but it is 84 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. hidden; it gradually evaporates. The possibility of utter Atheism is there; but the heart flies in dismay from it. The vision of a Unity resulting from the reconciliation of opposites is there ; but it either passes into a mere theory, or seeks for images to express it, which make it material. The conception of an intelli- gent soul in nature is there; but it quickly resolves itself into a recognition of all Nature as symbolising human deeds and attributes. Lastly, the idea of deified men is there ; but this loses itself in another, that there is in man, in humanity, a certain Divine Intelli- gence, which at different times, and in different places, manifests itself more or less completely, and which must have some one central manifestation. The Human Intellect is first felt to be the perfect organ of worship ; finally its one object. This is Buddhism; this is the conviction which, with more or less of confusion, is working in the hearts of three hundred millions of people on this globe of ours. I greatly desire to ask this doctrine, what testimony it bears for or against that hypothesis which it is the purpose of these Lectures to examine; the hypothesis, I mean, that the Divine portion of the faith of different nations signifies nothing; that it is only an attempt to explain the phenomena of the universe ; that there is no need of a Revelation to man, because in himself, in his own heart, there is a sufficient revelation of all the truths he wants to know ; that we may safely leave this to work itself out as it can in the different religious LECT. III.] CHINA.— SOCIAL ORDER. 85 systems, without pretending to inculcate notions of our own, which, perhaps, are only a little better than those we should displace. But I believe we shall be in a fairer condition to meet these questions, when we have considered the circumstances of a country in which Buddhism does not exist alone; in which it is coun- teracted, and yet, I think, also illustrated, by the presence of systems older, in that country at least, than itself. Numerous as are the puzzles which the history and actual condition of China may present to European inquirers — even to those few who are acquainted with its language, and have had opportunities of closely observing it — I do not think that there is much differ- ence of opinion respecting its main and distinguishing characteristic. Its learned men, we are told by the most respectable authorities, say, without exception, 'a principle of Order is that which we discover and reverence in the world : ' and every act of their lives, the construction of their society, their art, their most minute ceremonies, bear out the assertion. If you hear their choicest phrases reported to you, or look at the works they have produced, or remember the duration of their empire, or think how many shocks from without it has withstood, or even read one of their singular state papers, you can scarcely avoid saying within yourself : here is a people which, success- fully or unsuccessfully, is striving to be orderly, which for generations has been carrying on this struggle, -^ 86 THE EELIGIONS OP THE "WORLD. [part i. \vhich hates everything that interferes with its success, Wou ld gladly obtain it by any sacrifice. Hence the preservation of historical records in their driest form has been as important a purpose in their eyes as it has been an indifferent or impossible one to the Hindoo. Hence, from first to last, we discover among them precisely the opposite view of social life to that which we have noticed in the conception of the Buddhist Lama. The Chinese does not first ask where Spiritual Intelligence dwells, and then confess that to this he must submit. But he starts with the belief in Govern- ment or Society ; and then demands that all study and intelligence should be applied to the preservation of it. The emperor is the datum or postulate from which the speculations of philosophers, as well as the arrange- ments of society, begin. He is put into the position which he holds that he may be the spring and soul of Order to the commonwealth. How he may be so he is to inquire very diligently. All the functionaries of government are to be chosen according to their fitness to preserve that order, according to their know- ledge of the maxims upon which it rests. To prevent any infractions of it by themselves, or those over whom they rule, is to be their incessant study. Instruction therefore, it would seem, has • been from the earliest period a primary condition of all civil duties and employments. The Chinese have not anticipated the West more in other machinery than in that of educa- tion, and in the importance which they have attached LECT. III.] CONFUCIUS.— ROOT OF HIS SYSTEM. 87 to it. Schools, great and little, especially for the instruction of those who shall have any offices in the state, were the great distinction of those dynasties, which we should call in the history of any other people — ^here the name would be strikingly inapplicable — the heroic period of the Empire. Because they fell into decay, and the fabric of social order with them, it was necessary that a Reformer should appear. Confucius appeared, not to introduce new maxims, but to revive the old — to explain what he saw to be the conditions and first principles of Chinese govern- ment, and to embody them in books. These books have been for two thousand years the school-books of China: the maxims of society and practical con- duct possessing an authority higher than any decrees, because they explain that which must make decrees stable, and procure obedience to them. The education of Confucius was one in state affairs. He was strictly a government functionary. He was disgusted with the confusion and disorder which he found in all depart- ments of the state, and he retired to meditate in secret the grounds upon which a reformation must be undertaken. He did not trust solely to his own reflec- tion, or to Chinese antiquity. There was an old man, Laoutsee, who spoke much of the Divine Reason which dwelt within each man, of its being the first object of every man to cultivate this, and to bring all his faculties of body and mind under its rule. This he seems to have set up as the maxim of life, in opposition to the 88 THE RELIGIONS OF THE "WORLD, [part i. political notions of it, which prevailed among his countrymen generally. To his words Confucius listened respectfully; though far from admitting his doctrine, he turned it to account by subordinating it to his own. He taught also that a man must cultivate this reason in himself — must try to arrive at self-government, even at perfect self-government ; but all for social ends and purposes, all that he might be better able to contribute towards the rational administration of the state, towards the preservation of public order. But where lay the root of this order? Its first ground Confucius, still professing only to be an interpreter of old and admitted doctrines, said, must lie in actual relationships; the family must sustain the state. The authority of the father must be the root of all other authority. The emperor must be regarded, must regard himself, as the common father. He was set to keep his people in order, and upon this principle he must order himself. These were not mere words. They actually express that which has been the binding principle of Chinese society, from generation to generation. Jesuit mission- aries, Protestant missionaries, English travellers, French philosophical admirers of Confucius, have all alike con- fessed it. The maxims of Confucius are faithful results of the observations of a man honestly desirous to make use of the experience that is given him for a moral purpose; they may generally be read with interest, often with admiration, as hints for conduct — even as helps to internal self-discipline. But they would be LECT. III.] CONFUCIUS NOT AN ATHEIST. 89 feeble and unmeaning, and could scarcely have exer- cised any great influence on the mind , of a nation, if they had not rested upon the recognition of a real and eternal principle of order, lying far deeper than all Chinese formalities, or than the formalities in the mind of Confucius himself Fatherly authority was his ultimate principle. Practically, he went not a step beyond it. What he heard of divine, unseen, mysterious powers above man, or above nature, or even in man and in nature, of some thing or person beyond the earthly emperor, or the earthly father — he by no means denied. Whatever faith his countrymen had respecting the in- visible world, he would have wished to confirm. But he did not see his way in such inquiries : he could not trace the actual connection between them and practical life. And the sincerity of his mind revolted against the notion of merely using them as artifices, to keep up respect for human institutions. On this ground he has, I think, been too hastily condemned as an atheistical philosopher. I cannot feel any desire to make good such a charge. It is a pleasanter, and also a truer course to admit that his confession of ignoraace may have been a genuine one ; and may even have im- plied that he had deeper thoughts than he knew how to express. We may be sure that what there was weak and maimed in his scheme will discover itself in the course of history, and that this discovery will be far more valuable than any rash conclusions of ours respecting it. Not many centuries after this reform, a Chinese 90 THE RELIGIONS OP THE "WORLD. [parti. emperor became aware that there was some blank in the doctrine of Confucius; a blank which was not filled up by turning him into a god, and raising temples to him. Side by side with the Confucian, or State-worship, dwelt the Taou sect, the disciples of that old philosopher with whom Confucius had conversed, men who still maintained that the Keason was something divine and mysterious in each person, and would lead him into inward, contemplation, not make him the handy instru- ment in the State machinery. But these people had little faith, except in themselves. The effect of their mysterious knowledge upon others seemed chiefly exhibited in charms and incantations and magic arts, which interfered with the good order of the State, rather than promoted it. Something else was wanted. The emperor heard of a great teacher and prophet somewhere in India. In spite of the remonstrances of wise men, who showed him how grievously he was departing from Chinese maxims in preferring foreign to native culture, the Buddhist faith was imported into the empire. A religion resting upon communion with the unseen world, in all its outward and many of its inward characteristics the direct opposite of the Con- fucian system, gained footing on the soil which that system ruled. The result was what might have been expected. The new faith took hold of popular sym- pathy and has retained that sympathy to the present day. It was and is despised by the great mandarins, by the functionaries of government, by the adorers of LEOT. III.] BUDDHIST AND CONFUCIAN DOCTRINE. 91 social order. But it is more than tolerated by the government as such; it is recognised as deserving of respect, even of homage. Though the emperor cannot allow the Lama to interfere with his own supreme rule, and has procured the appointment of a deputy Lama who shall be really the head of the Buddhist society in his dominions, and his subject, he yet sends embassies to the high priest in Thibet, and asks his intercessions for China. Evidently Buddhism is felt, even by the disci- ples of Confucius, to be an element of society in China which cannot be dispensed with, and for which their own system, much as they may prefer it, offers no substitute. I have said, that in most of its inward, as well as outward characteristics, the Buddhist and the Confucian doctrine are opposed. I used this language, because it is evident that in one respect they are not opposed. Different as are the functions which are assigned to the intellect of man in the three Chinese systems, that intellect is still an object of profound veneration to all. Wisdom is viewed as wholly social and experimental in the first, internal and mystical in the second, strangely mixed with the idea of what is superhuman and eternal in the third. Had it been otherwise, had there been nothing common in these faiths, it is scarcely possible to conceive of them dwelling together in such an empire; or to suppose that one should at all supply the gaps in the other. And which, then, of these three faiths shall we say can be described by that comprehensive formula, ' a mere 92 THE RELIGIONS OE THE "WOELD. [parti. attempt to explain the phenomena of the universe 1 ' All three do attempt that, doubtless, — Buddhism, espe- cially. But, does the faith of the Buddhist consist in this ? Is it this which in his inmost heart he wants to know ? Every inquiry we have made has led us to the opposite conclusion. He is obliged to question the uni- verse, because he does not know what else he should question. He has questioned it, and to every problem which disturbs him it has returned a more confused answer. He has asked, what that is within him which is higher than it, what that is which seeks a knowledge which it cannot give ? He is sure that he is above the world — that it was never meant to be his master — that the spirit in him must have its ground elsewhere. But where ? What is this ground ? Is it anything ? Is it nothing ? Who will tell him ? That which has asked the question cannot give the answer. With deepest solicitude, he cries, " Do Thou, of whom I see the foot- marks in natural things, but most of all in human beings, in those who have thoughts and reasons, and wills, — in those who feel that these are not meant to be the servants of their senses or of the things with which their senses deal, — do Thou tell me who Thou art, and how I may draw nigh to Thee. Tell me what Thou hast to do with man, for something Thou must have. TeU me if there be a man, and where he is, in whom I may behold Thee ; One who is not here to-day, and gone to-morrow ; but who, amidst all changes of times, the disappearance of generations, lives on. Tell me if there be indeed a LECT. III.] THE RESULTS OF BUDDHISM. 93 King and High Priest of the universe — a man actually Divine. And this, too, I need to know : What that Light is which dwells in me ; whether it is self-derived, or, as my inward heart tells me, derived from Thee. Whether there be any Spirit coming forth from Thee to dwell in men, and bind them together — to make them gentle and gracious and wise — to be the common life of all and still the life of each. And if these things be so, tell me how these things can be recon- ciled, as my reason has whispered that they can be, though as yet I see not how, with that Unity — the essential condition of Thy Being — that which divides Thee from all the multitude of things and persons with whom in this world we converse." I say that Buddhism, rightly interpreted, is a prayer of this kind — an earnest prayer, consciously or unconsciously uttered by three hundred millions of people. And yet we are told that it is honouring the faith of these people, showing tenderness and respect for them, to believe that there is not any Kevelation, save that which man procures for himself. In other words, that this prayer never has been, never can be, answered. Only if we have really brought ourselves to this contempt for the thoughts of so many human beings, can we patiently think of this faith working out, as the phrase is, its own results. It has been working out its results for all these thousand of years — and what have they been? The worship of the intellect has not caused the intellect to grow — not even to 94 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. grow to an ordinary human or earthly stature ; I say nothing of that Divine stature which it feels that it may reach. The priest of Buddha, of the Intelligence, is rarely an intelligent man. That mighty portion of the globe over which Buddhism rules is nearly the most ignorant portion of it. And yet in it lie the seeds of all highest, noblest culture, if only we can really address ourselves to that which is within the hearts of those who hold this faith, if we can only tell them that which they crave to know. That it is a vain and cruel thing merely to carry our own notions among them — our notions upon any subject, divine, human, earthly, I admit readily. If we do not know that which will solve their riddle — if we cannot tell them — Here is that which will turn doubt and con- fusion into clearness; here is that whicli is not our notion, but which has come from God to confound our notions, to confound our pride ; and which is meant, not for us, but for mankind : for mercy's sake let us be silent — the Buddhists are better as they are. So also of the Confucian scheme. That cannot be charged with want of practical results. Yet that some- thing is wanting, China itself has confessed. Can it be supplied from within ? When we fancy it I think we commit a great injustice. Mr. Medhurst, the author of an interesting book on China, the result of his own observations, expresses his wonder and even indignation, that Confucius, having dwelt so beautifully on the rights and duties of a father, should LECT. III.] WHAT THE CHINESE REQUIRE, 95 not have carried up his thoughts to the Great Father of all. I confess that I feel quite unable to adopt this language. It seems to me evidence of Confucius being a sincere man, that he did not allow himself to use mere figures of rhetoric upon this subject, for such in his lips they would have been. If having spoken of one holding an actual relation under the name of Father, he had afterwards used that word as a synonym for a Creator or for an unknown Being, the pleasure which such expressions might have caused us would have been dearly purchased by the loss of reality in the mind of him who resorted to them. If you can tell the Chinese that this is an actual relation, that it has been proved to be so, that our human relation is the image of it, that the reality of one gives reality to the other, that the honour paid to relationships is not incompatible with that seemingly abstract, unsocial, unreal view of the Reason of which the Taou sect has been the champion ; and that the Buddhist spiritualism is not an element of new confusion, but of reconciliation : you will indeed discover to him that deepest founda- tion of order which he is looking for, you will show him that way from the visible to the Invisible which he has never yet discovered. But any teaching short of this, that hard and formal and yet withal practical and serious mind of his, will repel. You will find that you have not learnt the spell which can break the heavy yoke of custom from off his neck, and change him from the most perfect of living machines into a living Man. 96 PART I.— LECTURE IV. The Old Persian, Faith and its destruction. The Egyptian. The Greek. The Roman. The Gothic. General Conclusion. rFHE Mahom etan, the Hindoo, and the Buddhist, a re -*- the great prevailing faiths of the world. A person indeed who should insist upon reducing all the religious thoughts and convictions he met with in different places under one of these three heads, would exhibit great practical ignorance ; for the feelings and apprehensions which belong to actual human beings will not bear to be so treated. A man will not really be intelligible to you, if, instead of listening to him and sympathising with him, you determine to classify him. But it is true, that one who has patiently studied and livingly realised the characteristics of these wide-spread beliefs, will not be hopelessly puzzled by the notions of men in any part of the globe, civilised or savage. There are no other existing forms of religious thought suffi- ciently distinct from these to deserve a separate examin- ation in such a course of Lectures as this ; none which have not grown out of them, or have not been rapidly absorbed into them. And it is of existing systems that I wished first and chiefly to speak, because for the practical object I proposed to myself, and which Boyle desired we should keep in sight, these must be LECT. IV.] PERSIA. 97 the most important. I could not, however, do proper justice to the subject, if, before I enter upon the second division of it — the consideration of the way in which Christianity is related to different religions — I did not touch upon what may be called the defunct systems, those which belong to history, and which have yielded to the might either of the Crescent or the Cross. The word 'defunct,' we shall soon find, is only in one sense applicable to them ; they had that in them which is not dead, and cannot die ; that which is exerting an influence upon the mind and education of Christendom at the present day. Still, as systems, they belong to the past ; they will therefore supply a new kind of test for trying the maxims respecting the worthlessness and transitoriness of what is merely theological, which I have been examining in former Lectures. For the reason I have given they ought not to be treated in the same detail as those which have occupied us hitherto : indeed, I do not think we should gain so much by con- sidering them in detail, as by glancing at them side by side ; so that the principles which distinguish them, and those wherein they are alike, may be more readily discerned. I shall therefore endeavour to compress what I have to say of them into a single Lecture. L The old Persian religion is the first which offers itself to our notice, as standing in a close relation, both outwardly and inwardly, to the Hindoo. The Zend- avesta, the religious book in which this faith is profess- edly set forth, cannot be appealed to as a very certain M. B.Ii. ^ 98 THE EELIGIONS OF THE "WORLD, [part i. authority respecting it ; what we possess is confessedly a compilation from earlier sources ; and though critics think that they can detect older fragments in the midst of it, there is great difficulty in separating them from the mass, or in determining the times when it was put together. The age and history of the man who is spoken of as the great prophet of this faith, Zerdusht or Zoroaster, are equally obscure. It has even been questioned whether such a man ever existed — whether he does not merely represent a divine principle, or a stage in a nation's history. It might seem, then, as if this doctrine, of which we have such vague records, must have exercised but a slight influence; at all events, that its essential character cannot be ascer- tained. Both conclusions would be erroneous. What- ever authority the Zendavesta may have, whatever kind of person Zoroaster may have been, the Persian faith has been bound up with the life of a great portion of Asia, and has left as strong evidences as any both of its nature and of its power over the minds of men, even in generations far removed from each other. The readers of Gib^n will remember a splendid passage of his history describing a great Asiatic revo- lution which took place in the third century after Christ. The old Persian empire was then ruled by the Parthians. Their dynasty had lasted for several cen- turies : it had been set up after the Greek armies had conquered Asia; after they had established their own babits and civilisation in the midst of it. Their worship LECT. IV.] CHARACTER OF THE PERSIAN EAITH. 99 the Parthians to a considerable extent adopted ; the old faith of the Persians they crushed. At the period I speak of, it was found that this faith had lain hidden under the soil, but had never been destroyed. The Magi came forth and proclaimed that vyhich they affirmed to be the original teaching of Zoroaster. The innovations of five centuries were swept away; a dynasty which the Persians recognised as the con- tinuation of the old kingdom of Cyrus was established, and the nation's old belief was the foundation upon which it rested. This power became the great Eastern antagonist of Rome : at a later period it had nearly wrested the empire of Asia from Constantinople : it sunk at' last under the irresistible strength of the Mahometan armies. For a time, those whom the Mahometans called fire- worshippers struggled hard; at length they vanished into an insignificant sect; Persia acknowledged the Prophet of Arabia as its one divine teacher. But what was the faith which governed the old Persian while he ruled the world — which dwelt so deeply in the heart of a people that it could revive after a lapse of centuries— which perished all but utterly at last ? We have seen that the Brahm of the Hindoo, the Buddha of that mighty sect which arose out of Hindooism, is especially the Intelligent Being, He in whom light dwells, and by communication with whom men become enlightened. Observe how natur- ally, how inevitably, one uses this word Light for A 100 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. j Intelligence. We feel instinctively that it is miicli the ■Jj^ better word of the two ; that one is hard and abstract, the other living and real. So men have felt in all t, countries and ages. Their bodily eye distinguished one thing from another — could exert itself in the day, - was useless in darkness. They had as certainly some- (} ? thing within them which could discern a sense in words, a meaning in things. This surely was an eye too. There was no better way of speaking about it. And there must be some light, answering to this eye, ^ ! I older than it, otherwise it could not be. They dis- covered, too surely also, that there was a state in which this eye saw nothing, a state of darkness. If we keep these very simple thoughts in our minds, (I say, keep them in our minds, for they are there already ; we are obliged to make use of this language — it belongs to us all, to prince and peasant alike,) and if we recollect that what we are apt to overlook as too simple is oftentimes just the most important thing of all — the key which unlocks a multitude of treasure- houses; we shall be able to enter into the belief of different people, and to trace the transition from one to another far more easily. The conviction which we have found dwelling so strongly in the minds of Brahmin and Buddhist, though taking different forms, was this — " He who has the inward eye most opened, must be the greatest man : he in whom it is quenched, must be the lowest and most miserable man." And the puzzle which we saw tormenting them both, in LECT. IV.] OEMUZD AND AHEIMAN. loi different ways and different degrees, was this. But where is this light ? Is it only in the eye ? What then does the eye behold ? Is it not in the eye ? How then can I call that a light ? A very deep question indeed ; the answers to which, in every case, are full of practical significance. The Persian solution was the most simple of all. He felt that his whole life was precisely this debate between light and dark- ness. There must, he said, be Lords over this light and over tbis darkness. This had probably been his oldest and strongest conviction. The nights in Persia are clear and beautiful. The stars were a language whicb spoke to peasant and priest alike of light coming out of darkness. On these the one will have meditated till he thought them powers and rulers of the world ; the other will have paid them actual homage. The Magians, the servants of the Light, will have devised a system of worship addressed to these. If Zerdusht or Zoroaster were a real man, he probably arose at a time when tbis worship had become very general, and when the mind of the people had become much debased by it. To some man, or some men, it was given to perceive that the ministers of light had become ministers of darkness. Those things whicb symbolised a Divine Light had been substituted for it. He rose up as the witness for Ormuzd, the Lord of Light, to testify that light comes from him, and not from the outward, material things ; that whoso serves them is the servant of Ahriman, the Prince of 102 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. [part I. Darkness. While Ahrimaa teaches his servants to bow down before visible things, Ormuzd communicates to men his living Word (that is the meaning of Zend^ avesta), speaks to a their hearts, teaches them the laws of justice and order. The battle between Ormuzd and Ahriman will be long, but Ormuzd must triumph at last. The kingdom of light is mightier than the kingdom of darkness. This was the substance of the Persian faith, to the revival of which, in its strength and simplicity, all that was vigorous in the Persian character and government seems to have been owing. teni}\ -oVtinitr:3rhere was the greatest difference between it and the Pc-c-bviV^ Hindoo: precisely this difference, — the Hindoo thought o \ of light and darkness as the opposition between cultiva- ^ tion and ignorance — between the Brahmin and the Sudra ; the Persian looked upon them as expressions for right and wrong. Far less refined and intellectual than the Indian, far less capable of mere speculation, he had a sense of practical, moral distinctions to which the other was almost a stranger, or, at least, which, never presented themselves to him, nakedly and directly, as the foundation of all other distinctions. Hence a difference in their scheme of life. Right must be proclaimed by some one ; not merely recognised or perceived. The Persian, therefore, looked much more to an authority which should command men, or to a teacher who should impart wisdom, than merely to a thinker or devotee. He regarded the king, from whom the law and words of grace proceeded, with more LECT. IV.] THE PERSIAN PUZZLE. 103 reverence than the priest. There might be many conflicts between the two, at times they might work in harmony, but this was the abiding, characteristic Persian feehng. But there were two or three difficulties specially besetting him who held this faith. The Persian felt that visible things were not to be adored. It was the worship of Ahriman to set up them as the lords of men. Yet he had more need than the Hindoo to feel that the object he was worshipping was above himself, not merely in himself. He must speak of the Light as coming to him, not merely as proceeding from him. But if so, how shall he realise it ? Must not the light, or must not the fire, or must not the sun, be in some sense or other an object for him to fear and obey ? This thought would be always re-appearing in the popular mind, nay, in the mind of the teacher who most protested against it, when he was struggling with the tendency in himself and other men to set up their own thoughts as if the true Light was in them. To meet it the Magian devises a theory. These out- ward objects are but images or counterfeits of some- thing within ; they are the productions of the king of darkness: the good and great beings who appear in the world come forth from the inner kingdom to subvert these. Starting from such a notion as this, it was easy to produce a universe of phantasies ; the simple and earnest mind of the Persian, struggling against them, and struggling in vain, would plunge into direct 104 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. idolatry. Another awful question there was : Did this power of good originate the power of evil, or is each self-created ? Or whence do they come ? Some hidden being there must be — some deeper ground than all that man could conceive. They tried to express it in some name — they called this ground of all things, Time vnthout Bounds. Under this last form the Persian faith came into contact with the Christian Church of the first ages.- The influence of the Gospel over Persia was slight and partial; but the preachers of it perceived a deep meaning in the Persian speculations. Gradually some appeared who thought the speculation beautiful, who cared little for the solution. These produced some of the darkest of the early heresies. When the Mussul- man encountered the Persian faith he felt no such temptation. " Is this your GoD — this Time without bounds, this phantasy the Living Being ? It is impos- sible. No ! pretend what you will, you are worshippers of fire, or of the sun, or of the stars. With our swords we cut through your webs of sophistry — through your worlds seen and unseen — your good and your evil prin- ciples. There is one God, and Mahomet is his prophet. Yield to that belief, or perish ! " The victory was very complete ; such an one is hardly recorded in the annals of the world. But when it was effected there was found to be something im- ».v».rvt.e. perishable in Persian faith and feelings which could i^i o,\>v»^hange the characteristics of Mahometanism itself. LECT. IV.] EGYPT. 105 To it we owe those stories of fairies and genii, whicli mix with our earliest impressions of Mahometanism. In a later time Persia became the home of the great Sofi. schism, which has introduced a new Pantheistic element into the doctrine of the Koran. Under the Mahometan teaching, which in Turkey has certainly- been favourable to veracity, the strong sense of moral right and wrong which distinguished the Old Persian has deserted him. He who was celebrated by Xenophon as above all men the speaker of truth, has become proverbial for lying. II. The history of Persia at a certain period becomes connected with that of Egypt. The connection is a religious one. The Persian king Cambyses seems to have been a fanatic, and to have carried on wars, if not for the propagation of his own faith, at least, for the punishment of those who held what he thought a false one. The Egyptian priests were especial objects of his abhorrence. If we ask on what grounds, we shall be led into the consideration of another faith of the old world, which has left the most singular records of itself; which at dififerent periods of its existence is bound up with Jewish and with Greek history ; which was an object of profound interest to students two thousand years ago, and is scarcely of less interest to the students of our own century. One subject immediately suggests itself to most of us when we think of Egypt. I mean its hieroglyphics, or sacred symbolical writing. And as the deciphering 108 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. of this writing has been the key to all modern dis- coveries respecting the details of the history of this people, so the mere fact itself that they did use such a character, is, perhaps, the most helpful of all to the understanding of its principle. We have seen what a puzzle it was to the Persian to connect the outward things which he saw with those which were objects of his thought ; how continually there seemed to be some light very near to his mind and heart which was reveal- ing itself to him ; how, while he realised this conviction, the outward sensible things which withdrew him from this light, were regarded as dark and evil ; and yet how difficult he found it to express his thoughts about that inward light, except in terms which soon became confused with sensible images. The Egyptian never seems to have had this horror of visible things. He felt that something very sacred lay beneath them, and was expressed by them. To discover what this was, to read what was hidden in the objects of nature, was, in his apprehension, the function of the wise man. Then he was to translate back these perceptions of his into outward forms and images, that the vulgar might be able to profit by them so far as it was meant that they should. Hence, there grew up an order of priests in Egypt, as separate from the rest of society as the Brahmins. A caste system organised itself in the African, as in the Asiatic, nation. But the Egyptian priest was not an abstracted man in the same sense as the Hindoo : he did not so much withdraw himself LECT. IV.] HIEROGLYPHICS— WHAT THEY IMPORT. 107 from the contemplation of outward things, as seek to extract a virtue and a meaning from them. His first thought of all seems to have been that there was a Being hidden from man, but who was making himself manifest in different forms and signs. His operations in nature, the power which is exerted over the earth, and the life which goes on within it, might, especially in a country of such unparalleled fertility as Egypt, present themselves as objects of wonder and witnesses of a Divine presence. But it would be impossible to think of these powers in the earth, without thinking of the animals which dwell upon it, of the different powers and qualities which they' display, of their birth and decay and renewal. These animals supply him with more distinct and definite symbols than the vague expanse of the heaven or earth. Different kinds of power are more concentrated and expressed in them ; they can be far more easily exhibited in stone or in writing. Hence these became predominant objects of meditation to the priests. The various characteristics of the Godhead very soon become Gods. Students of Egyptian monuments discover three stages in the / worship — three different cycles of gods. In the earliest / cycle the idea of the Ammon, the hidden god, is the predominant one; and his manifestations are them- selves rather in active energies, in vital operations, ^ than in outward objects. The third cycle is the one XVf most directly outward, hinting, however, at principles which in the first period were less perceived. As might 108 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [paet i. be expected, different cities are found to have different classes of symbols ; those in Upper Egypt to be charac- teristically diverse from those in the Lower ; though at some period an attempt must have been made to bring all into one system. Here, then, we seem to be in the idolatrous country — the country of divided worship ; that which teaches us what idolatry means; how man loses sight of a centre; how every separate thing about him may become his master. And yet, throughout the whole of this idolatry, there is a perpetual questioning of an -^unknown power to tell what this visible creation means. - Each thing that is beheld is a riddle, an oppressive, 'J^^ tormenting riddle, of which some solution must be n-v -t which cities spring up and men are brought into order ' and harmony. Apol lo seerns_to_be_the_central figure in ^i§§tjSliiS2lfiSXi-&&*- -'^'SWP'i which the ^others have disposed themselves. The idea of Light and Wisdom, which is concentrated in him, is diffused in different forms, male and female, through the rest of the mythology, each having some particular locality, and presenting some different aspect to the Greek mind. But it is felt that this bright, clear, human form ^ cannot be the ground of all things. A Hindoo might have said that he was an emanation from the First Principle ; but a Greek, with his strong human feelings, at once refers him to a Parent, and says that he must ^■^-J'sj^ 'V be the Son of_Zeus, the Lord of All. And what is He, ■^'-'-1 ^^ and where does He dwell? On a high Thessalian hill, ~J!Do.^'\^ *•- to perpetual thirst for seizing the divine nectar — one -%aj\. A whose name declares him to be the representative of "^^^^ wisdom and foresight, who opposed the brute strength of the Titans, but who, because he stole fire from~-p heaven for the good of man, must be fastened to a il rock, and be the prey of a vulture, till a predestined deliverer should come. All these conceptions could harmonise very well with that worship of Apollo which seems to have been characteristically the Greek worship. But at some time or other a mysterious divinity appeared, who possessed men with an inspiration which raised them into gods, or degraded them into brutes — a power to be felt rather than beheld. The Greek imagination was able to give even this Deity a form and a name ; to invest him with ivy-leaves, and describe him as coming amid songs and shoutings from India. But the idea of such a power, so near to man, so deep and inward, could not forsake them. It uttered itself in poems, which were of a very different character from the free songs of early times; which spoke of M. B. L. ■' 114 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. man as carrying on a conflict with himself and with the world; which spoke of a deep, unknown Fate, whereto even the gods must bow. This faith associated itself also with Mysteries, which imparted to the mind of the whole nation a sense of something too sacred for words to utter, or images to represent, and which must, nevertheless, lie at the root of human life and society. Meantime the feelings which these mysteries con- veyed to the popular mind were realised in another way by thoughtful men; they began to say within them- selves. The origin of the things we see, of our own lives, of human society, cannot be in those persons to whom the traditions of our ancestors have ascribed them. The authors, they said, of these traditions were poets, who created our creators. But where is that which is not conceived, not created ? Is it in the things them- selves — in water, or earth, or air, or fire ? Is it in our own mind ? Is it in some principle which unites these together 1 These were the questions which the Greeks asked themselves, when they could be no longer content with the vision of a fair-haired Apollo, but must find out what that Light or Intelligence was of which his name testified. In pursuing such inquiries, some were willing to seek aid of those Egyptian priests who seemed to have discerned the meaning of things, and not to have invented a meaning for them. Some wished to turn the stories of their childhood into mere abstract speculations; some discarded them and all belief to- lECT. IV.] LATER GEEECE. ]15 gether. The wisest of them laboured to show the Greek youths that their Conscience and Reason de- manded something which they did not create for themselves; that all faith and reverence and worship, the words which they spoke, their own existence, their very doubts and questionings, pointed to a deep, V-tj\ \ eternal ground, which could not be a visible phantom, nor a theory, nor an abstraction — which must be the Being., We may possibly persuade ourselves that with this record of human thoughts we have nothing to do. But with it is bound up the history of one of the most remarkable people that has ever existed upon the earth. Their inward history is necessary to interpret the out- ward one. From it we must learn why the Greeks were so mighty, and why they were so weak; why their intellect asserted such a dominion over the greatest physical power, and why it could not be victorious over the animal nature in themselves ; why, when they were feeble, they seemed capable of ruling the world, and why, when they became its masters, they were broken in pieces. And this inquiry has not become an obsolete one even in reference to Greece itself; the last thirty years have given it new interest. The Greek mythology, after some desperate efforts to ally itself with philosophy, and in that shape to put itself forth as an antagonist to Christianity, sunk into insignificance; the last school of purely^Grggk^ philo- sophy was closed in the reign of Jjustinian. But the 116 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part i. habits and character which that mythology and philo- sophy embodied, exhibited themselves most remarkably in the history and controversies of the Christian Church, were preserved at Constantinople through the whole of the middle ages, penetrated into the West at the revival of letters, have survived on .their own soil three centuries of Mahometan dominion, and must be earnestly studied by all who desire that the new Greek kingdom should not exhibit all tbe vices and none of the merits of the old Greek republics ; who desire that it should be, as it may be, an efficient bond between the European and the Asiatic, the Western and the Eastern world. IV. The faith which is embodied in the acts and literature of the Eomans is often supposed to be the same with that of the Greeks. But this opinion arises, I think, from the habit of comparing the systems together, instead of seeking the main and central object in each. The majority of the Latin books which we read belong to a period after the Greeks had become the teachers of Eome, and after its own faith had in a great measure disappeared. Yet even from these it is easy to perceive that Apollo, who as the teacher of wisdom, the model of human beauty, the source of harmony, was the prominent Greek Divinity, never could have occupied any similar place in the Latin mind. In the system of the Greeks the father of Gods and men was of course the centre. He was so, 1 believe, practically and vitally to the Roman. But LECT. IV.] BELIEF OF GREECE AND ROME. 117 he did not habitually think of Jupiter as seated on a mountain, as the lord of earth and air. Such notions might gradually develop themselves in his mind ; but, first of all, he believed there was One in the capitol ■t^sr^,r,l(;, of his own city; a presence there from which all lawT" ■ , and government, the right of the father, the authority ^^ ^■t^ of the consul, proceeded. These different conceptions^-f^j^.,^ — of a Being dwelling in the centre of the world, and uttering oracles of wisdom to guide the thoughts and iinderstandings of men — of one dwelling in the centre of the City, and issuing words of authority and law to bind citizens together, to restrain, mould, organise societies, seem to mark the difference between the characters and doings of the two nations ; each wonder- fully asserting the power of man over natural things, and ascribing this power to his connection with a divine ruler, or teacher, or inspirer : but the one using nature to set forth man's thoughts, the other making it the servant of his purposes ; the first creating statues, the other roads and aqueducts ; both aiming at unity, but the one always ready to sacrifice actual unity to an ideal, the other considering everything subordinate to the object of keeping men practically at one ; each alike disturbed by the oppositions of self-will and indi- vidual interest ; but these concealing themselves, in the Greek, under the pretence of defending some Principle ; in the Roman, under the ambition of upholding the rights of some Order. This distinction is apparent in every part of the ^o >& 118 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. ^ ■ r Eoman faith. A God who defines and preserves bound- aries is more sacred in his eyes than the teacher of the divinest art. If he honours any God as a teacher it is Mercury, because he imparts the gift of eloquence, by which bodies of men are swayed — by which armies are moved or regulated. This result, and not the cultivation of any faculty for its own sake, is what he seeks. The god of war, who is often utterly con- temptible in the Greek legends, is his great patron and defender. The first king in old Roman heroic traditions is his son, though it is not as a conqueror, but as the organiser of an infant community, that those traditions present him to us. War, in the Roman conception of it, is not an exhibition of individual prowess, however such prowess may be called forth by it ; but a means of subduing restless, striving atoms into order. It is, then, not at all inconsistent with his reverence for Mars, that a feeling of the sanctity of domestic ties should especially belong to his faith. Virgil, who, though as a writer he may have copied Greek models, was in heart a Roman, and entered into the spirit of his country's traditions better than any man, lays the foundation of it in filial reverence, in the care of household gods. If the Roman entertained any of the Persian awe of fire, as the symbol of light and penetrating power, it was expressed in his worship of Vesta, the goddess of the hearth, the preserver of family purity, and in the fire which was ever to be kept burning within her temple. The power of the LECT. IV.] DECAY OF ROMAN BELIEF. 119 father lay at the root of his law and life ; and it was not, like the Chinese, a mere human apprehension, it was practically and essentially connected with all his thoughts of a Divine Being. He looked upon the bonds of family life as implied in the existence of a commonwealth — as its necessary basis and continual support. Upon any less real foundation so mighty a power could not have stood. Having such a ground, whatever threatened it with dissolution ultimately con- tributed to its strength. Conflicts of different orders of society brought out principles of the constitution which were previously latent; opposing principles, yet necessary to each other. And soon it seemed as if a power which had grown up by such regular and mysterious processes must be irresistible. Carthage, Egypt, Greece, bowed before it. The Parthian Empire disputed with it the sovereignty of Asia. The countries of Western Europe it appeared specially appointed to subdue and civilise. The belief of Kome gave it, as we have seen, its centre : in the capitol where Jove dwelt, the nation and the world which it ruled found the principle of their cohesion. The statesmen saw that it was so ; they lost the belief, but determined that it must be upheld for the state's sake. The Family they would have acknowledged it was expedient to uphold for the same reason; but that refused to stand upon a fiction, to live merely because it was wanted by the pohtician. As all domestic bonds became relaxed, the forms of the religion became more ^^. ^^^U0 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. ^v''" ._^. ■ consciously unreal. Then it was seen that the state ./~ ' could not exist any longer upon its old ground. A visible Emperor must supply the place of an invisible Law and Presence. The military sacrament of the soldier to the commander must be the one substitute o'?' for the ancient reverence. And such was the force of ^ this bond, so much of the feeling and principle of - J?" ^- order still survived in it, that the state could last ^ Q-^ even for centuries with this thin plank separating it / from the abyss. The plank cracked often — gave way * ^ at last ; and the nations, which had been prepared for Xi"> the day and the hour, seized the spoil. Before that jS-'* ^- catastrophe the proclamation of a set of Galilean fisher- "'^ men, that a crucified man was the Lord of the World, had been believed by the Emperors. Roman paganism seemed to disappear from the earth. But its peculiar character, the secret of its power, the cause of its decay, should be carefully reflected on, or the history of Western Christendom for twelve hundred years will be to us an inexplicable riddle. V. Very soon after Rome became an empire it was discovered that there was a part of Europe which was more formidable to it than even the Parthian empire in the East. Intelligent Romans began to inquire very earnestly what that German race was which seemed to present the newest and strangest obstacle to Roman ascendancy. They had a prophetic feeling that the question would be a very interesting one in after days to their own country and to man- V LECT. IV.] THE GOTHS.— THEIE MYTHOLOGY. 121: kind. They found a people who recalled to them the traditions of their own ancestors; rude and scattered, full of individual energy, severe and chaste, reverenc- ing family bonds ; with a sense, however imperfectly developed, of social order. A few observations they made upon the faith of this people, which are well Avorthy of note. "The Germans looked upon day," says Tacitus, " as coming out of night, the last as the ground of the first. They appeared to pay a kind of worship to the earth. They looked upon themselves as descended from Mannus." It seemed to the Eoman, trying to translate their notions into his own, that Mercury was their chief god. These hints, slight and imperfect as they are, throw great light upon the mythology of Germany and the North, as we receive it from those who lived under its influence. To trace it through all its mazes may be difficult, and not very profitable; but there are certain great features in it which are worthy of earnest consideration. I did not endeavour to disconnect the Mythology of Persia from its cHmate and scenery. The thoughts of the Magiah were wonderfully affected by Eastern nights and days, and Eastern earth and sky. So like- wise were the thoughts of the Goth, by the murky atmosphere in which he dwelt, by the dark woods which he must fell, by the seas out of which the solid land emerged or which broke in upon it. Doubtless, the phenomena of the world occasioned the Northerns great perplexity; all the powers of earth and air and ^^. ?:/ .^ — ^ "^ l^/^lf^ a! THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part i. 2^' - -< ^ fire and water are at work in their tales and poems. ^^^^ ^ The conflicts of these powers may, in one sense, be ,„„^.f^ said to be the subject of them. "But we know little, indeed, about our ancestors, if we suppose that they were thinking merely about such matters. They described wars of giants, of good and evil powers. It is easy to say these giants only express the struggles and throes of nature — cultivation con- tending with barrenness, spring succeeding winter. But why are they giants ? Why do they take this personal form ? Why, if winter and spring were chiefly in their minds, did they not speak of winter and spring ? Tacitus is most right in saying that the earth is the object of their study, perhaps of their worship ; but he is still more right in saying that they felt them- selves derived from Mannus. Man is the subduer of the earth ; because he lives upon it, tills it, sows it, rescues it from the waters, brings the harvests of autumn out of the frosts of winter ; therefore do these Goths care about the earth. And those battles which they see going on upon it or beneath it, those struggles of gigantic powers of evil with deliverers and bene- factors, are interpreted to them by what they feel going ou in themselves ; they are the wars of Mannus, much more than of the earth, and sea, and sky. Read them in this light, and every Northern saga is full of pro- foundest interest and instruction. A mighty power of death and of darkness struggling to draw all creatures into itself; mightier powers of good struggling against LECT. IV.] ODIN.— VARIOUS THEORIES. 123 it; consuming fires, that are to destroy what is corrupt; life coming oiit of death, second birth, resurrection — these are ideas by which you see that they were haunted and possessed. They could find no clue to the strange mystery, yet they felt that it was near them, and about them, and that there must be some bright sun, which would come forth one day to scatter the shadows, and show all things in their true relations and proportions. Yet it is equally true that Mannus himself and his origin are lost in the Infinite. Tacitus expresses the idea of the mythology in this respect too distinctly and definitely, but not unhappily, when he speaks of Mercury the messenger of gods and men, who passes rapidly from heaven to earth, and from earth to the shades below, who connects each with the other, as the object of Gothic reverence. Such a being, only surrounded with vagueness and mist, not capable of being exhibited in a form like the Greek Hermes, or the Roman Mercury, is the Northern Odin. Each new theorist about him will present him in a different aspect, one as a mere mortal, to whom a history may be ascribed — -one as a mere divinity — one as a teacher of human wisdom — one as merely the ideal of wisdom — one perhaps as the representation of some physical process — one as the establish er of a political order. Each may give plausible reasons for his opinion; no worshipper of him could have told you which was true; he would have felt that in some sense all must be trae. Precisely the necessity of his mind was to 124 THE RELIGIONS OF THE "WORLD, [part i. find some object in which these characters might really meet: who should bring the clear light out of the darkness, and be a conqueror in that war with the earth's tormentors. -..^' I have now completed this division of my subject, and I may ask you for a moment to consider how the different portions of it are connected together, and what is the general result. Mahomet&,nism, we see, stands upon a different ground from all the~rest. It starts from the Divine Will, it assumes a declaration of that Will to men, it affirms men to be the servants of God to execute His Will. Hindooism has only the faintest conception of a Divine Will ; but it recognises a Divine original Light or Intelligence from which the intelligence in man proceeds, and which it is to contemplate. In striving to ascertain what this Light is — how it is distinct from the human intelligence — the Brahmin becomes lost inspeculation. The Buddhist cuts the knot, practically makes man's intellect the origin of all tjiings; yet recognises a certain universal Intelligence dwelling_in the race, and concentrated from time to time in some person. Hindooism and Buddhism have been compelled in different ways to come down from the merely abstract region, and to speak of the Divinity as concerned with the doings of ordinary men; as exercising influences beneficent or pernicious over them : each has been obliged to LECT. IV.] SUMMARY. 125 explain what the universe has to do with the original Intelligence ; each has been compelled into an idolatry of material things against which, in its first conception, it is a protest. Both have struggled with Mahomet- anism, and been overcome by it; neither has been able to amalgamate with it; for neither has it been found to be a substitute. Buddhism in China has established itself side by side with a system of social order, the basis of which is the recognition of paternal authority, and which regards the knowledge of the invisible as unattainable. Entirely opposed to this system. Buddhism has been found nevertheless an in- dispensable supplement to it : even for the accom- plishment of its own purpose. These different faiths, which exercise a dominion over so large a portion of the universe, claim something to satisfy them, some- thinsr to unite them. Not one of them contains the solution of the difiBculties which it has raised ; each testifies that there is a chasm which the other seems meant to fill up; but it remains a chasm still. Not one of them can be satisfied by any philosophical theory about the universe, or about man, or about God, or about all of them. Mahometa nism meets such theories by its primary proclamation, G od is; He must be a living personal Being: he must be the King of Men. Hindooism is continually attempting to philosophise, but every new turn of its history proclaims, W e want a Living Intelligence ^hich shall hold converse with men, and with which men may 126 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part r. converse. Buddhism has been a continual effort at philosophy ; but every passage of its history proclaims. Philosophy will not do for us; we want a Living In- telligence to dwell in man. And now we have to add some new evidence to this. First, we hear from the Persian a cry for some infinite, absolute Being, the ground of Light and Darkness, which he can only call Illimitable Time. Then from the Egyptian the witness of an Ammon, or hidden God. Then from the Greek the cry for something which he cannot express — which must be veiled in mysteries, which the poet speaks of as irresistible Fate, which the philosopher says must be the Being, which cannot be material, and yet is no abstraction. The Roman must have an invisible God of the city, a righteous lawgiver, preserving the authority of his state, or it perishes. Unless in the heaven or the abyss there be one greater than Mannus, the dark thoughts of the Goth signify nothing. But none of them can be satisfied with the recognition of this hidden Being. There must be a manifestation of Him. From the immeasurable Time a Light must come forth, and that Light must be a Person. An Ormuzd must speak living words, nay must be a living Word. Aramon must assume forms ; the visible must, in some way, set forth the Invisible. One all clear and bright must be himself Wisdom to the Greeks — must utter the thoughts of Wisdom, which keep them a people, and then must scatter himself through a thousand visible images. The Jove of the capitol cannot be LECT. IV.] A EEALITY IN THE MYTHOLOGIES. 127 only there. His presence must come forth in the host and in the family. Odin must travel from land to land, teach, give laws, open Walhalla to men. Look at these religions, and you see in them all a\ •witness of unity. Look at them again, and you see there is something which divides them from each other. They confess that if men are to unite, it must be in something above themselves ; they cannot unite ; for things beneath themselves, the accidents of life, the climate, the soil of the lands in which they dwell, seem to determine what it is that is above them. They confess that if men are to_ unite, it must be in something above themselves; but the habits, tempers, tastes of the worshippers determine what it is which is above them. This is the report which history gives of these religions — the stamp which they have left of them- selves upon the actual universe. Dare you talk of all this as merely an illustration of the working of the religious principle in men? Dare you use such a dry, withered, heartless abstraction, to get rid of the recollection that you have been hearing how beings of your own flesh felt and acted and suffered ? Or can you comfort yourselves with saying, " These have all passed away; the Persian Ormuzd and Ahriman — the Egyptian dream of types in the world which must have some antitype — the Greek question, how is it I can create such marvels ? what is it I cannot create ? — the Koman sense of a divine order in the 128 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. [part i. nation and family — the Odin warfare of good and evil spirits ; they have passed away as visions of the night." Visions they were, but visions which came to men concerning the dreadful realities of their own existence. They were visions of the night, but by them men had to steer their vessels and shape their course; without them all would have been dark. And we belong to the same race with the men who had these visions; some nearer to us, some more distant, some brought up in regions utterly unlike our own, some almost our kinsmen after the flesh ; all our kinsmen in reality. It has not been a mistake, I believe, in our educa- tion that we' have busied ourselves so much with the legends of Greece and Rome. If we used them aright, they would not serve for the food of an idle dilet- tantism — they would teach us reverence and fear. We should tremble as we remembered, "These dreams of a beauty which eye hath not seen, or ear heard, have visited the hearts of human beings generations ago; the dark and filthy imaginations which mingled with these dreams were engendered in the same hearts ; by one as much as the other and by the fearful combin- ation we know that those hearts were like our own. They will dwell together in us, and in time the vile will seem real, the beautiful only a shadow, unless we can find that the beauty has been somewhere sub- stantiated; unless we can see the beauty apart from the corruption ; unless there is some power which can establish the one and destroy the other in ourselves." LECT. IV.] A REALITY IN THE MYTHOLOGIES. 129 Such reflections often come, I trust, to the young men of our land, as they read the classical fables. Yet these belong rather to a refined cultivation, and they may so possess the mind with the love of finite forms as to make it forget that those who conceived them could not be satisfied with them, but cried for the Infinite beyond. It is otherwise with the tales of our own proper ancestors. These are bound up with the thoughts of our peasantry ; the most ignorant man feels that they represent some of the unspeakable fears and hopes of his spirit. And they clothe themselves in no graceful forms. The storms and earthquakes of nature are the only adequate types of the conflict which they speak of, a conflict in which human beings of that day were actually engaged. Are we not engaged in it too ? Have we asked ourselves whether we can bear up in it alone ? if not, whether we know where help in it is to be found ? PAET II. EELATIONS OF THE RELIGIONS OP THE WOELD WITH CHRISTIANITY. LECTUEE I. Why Judaism has not occupied a separate place in these Lectures. Mahometanism related to Christianity on its Judaical side. Nature of the relation, indicated. Wherein Mahometanism differs from Judaism. Dangers to Christianity from the forgetfulness or predominance of its Mahometan side. How the Christian Faith and Church satisfy the cravings of Mahometans. T SPOKE in my last lecture of Mahometanism, Hin- -^ dooism, and Buddhism, as the three great existing religions of the world; of the Persian, the Egyptian, the Greek, the Eoman, and the Gothic, as the most conspicuous of those which belong to the past. It may strike some of you, that in one of these lists, though you may scarcely be able to say in which, there was a capital omission. Might not even the letter of Boyle's Will have reminded me, that the Christian missionary is likely to be encountered by Jews in all parts of the world? Is there any faith which has had a more memorable past than theirs ? It is indeed true, that a person must take a most imperfect view of society^ during the last eighteen LECT. I.] THE JEWS. 131 hundred years, who forgets that the Jew has had a place in it. Upon ■whatever age, upon whatever por- tion of the world he fixes his eye, this strange figure encounters him. He sees men without a place which they can call their own upon the earth, still feeling themselves to be the nation which has been chosen out of all others to be the head of the earth ; men willingly ay - submitting to the most grovelling occupations, and with^N^^^^*"^ a character seemingly conformed to these occupations, 'J=-'^'' '^ yet never deserted by a vision of past and future glory ; / ' j men trampled upon by all people, and yet exercising a mighty influence, one which has increased with the increase of riches and civilisation, over the counsels of Yc4,-a.\a^ ^ ■ ^ ov. f oh III. But we detected a yet deeper conception beneath that one of the relation of the Brahmin to Brahma ; we found that Brahma himself was supposed to be the expression or manifestation of Brahm, who must be thought of only as Absolute, Self-existent. These two ideas are inseparable. The God is said to have sought for a companion of His throne, and having considered and rejected all animal natures, at last to have found His one adequate image in man. This thought, we saw, was a pregnant one : a dualism, not of opposition but of consort, might be traced through the whole mythology. Now, in the passage which I quoted from the Book of the Proverbs, you cannot fail to have noted the words, "The Lord possessed me in the beginning of 176 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [paet ii. His way. I was with Him as one brought up with Him." Beneath this "Wisdom, this teacher of the Sons of Men, this Euler of Princes, by whom the sea and earth have been formed, there is still a deeper and more unfathomable essence. Is this a dream, mixing inconsistently with the rest of the discourse? You cannot banish it without destroying the sense of the context. Does it stand apart from the general course and tenor of Jewish Revelation? You cannot under-: stand the most striking turning-points of that Revel- ation, if you determine to pass by these words as incomprehensible or insignificant. Habitually the Jew believed that He whom he worshipped dwelt in the thick darkness ; no eye had seen Him ; it was unlawful to conceive any likeness of Him. But he also believed that this Lord had revealed Himself to Abraham, as he sat by the tent-door in the heat of the day on the plain of Mamre ; that He had been the Captain of the Hosts of Israel; that He had spoken to and by every holy seer. Do you say, " These were difficulties ; they look like contradictions in the faith of this people; they seem fragments from different religions — witnesses that they were not, as divines pretend, the subjects of a continuous, harmonious revelation " ? I admit the difficulty ; I see why those who have never discovered it in themselves, should suppose it must have arisen from the blending of two incompatible traditions. I admit, further, that the apparent contradiction could not be removed from the mind of the Jew; that it must have haunted him — sometimes have tormented LECT. II.] AN APPARENT DISCREPANCY. 177 him ; that the vision of a reconciliation will only from time to time have cheered him, in the fulfilment of lowly duties, after hours of deep sorrow, in the temple- worship; that a verbal reconciliation could not satisfy him, or any man. But a reconciliation he and the Hindoo both demand ; the penalty of not finding it is — Modern Judaism, or Modern Hindooism. In that passage, which I purposely mutilated when I quoted it before, St. John says, " In the beginning was the "Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God." He states broadly, and in union, the two truths which the former dispensation had beheld separately, each of which had seemed at times to stifle the other, each of which had again seemed necessary to the other. But he does not attempt to bring them together in words, until, as he believes, they had first been brought together in fact. The Word, he says, was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only-begotten of the Father), full of grace and truth. IV. I would beg you to remark how the Evangelist^ speaks of Him here, first as a Word, then as a Son. The Hindoo dreamed of Light proceeding from a fountain of Light; the Greek of a Child springing from a Father. Naturally, and without effort, St. John recognises both conceptions ; for the divine Wisdom is with him no abstraction; the divine Son is with him no material image. Hence there is no sudden transition from the divinest part of the Christian lore ]78 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [paet ii. to that which connects it with the popular faith of Hindooism. The Word was made, flesh. A divine Incarnation is affirmed to be the great instrument for redressing the evils of the world. It is declared that He who had held converse with holy men in their hearts, He whose life was the light of men, had brought himself nigh to all, so that He could be seen with human eyes, handled with human hands. I have said that the Scripture speaks of this In- carnation as the means for the redress of mortal evils. But if we will use its language strictly, we shall make a closer approximation to the Hindoo apprehension; we shall say that it was expressly to deliver men out of the power of the Destroyer, to break in pieces his kingdom, that the Eternal Word became one with his creatures. Nowhere more distinctly than in Christian Theology is there the recognition of the fact which the Siva worshipper perceives ; nowhere less effort to make men comfortable by dissembling the fact, that misery and death have gotten hold of the earth ; nowhere a more emphatic affirmation of the witness which the hearts and consciences of men have borne everywhere, but with special earnestness in Hindostan, that in them, in the region of man's inner being, is the fiercest debate with the evil which he sees without ; that there, in that region, he has to encounter it in its highest form, in its most radical principle. The Gospel does not start with a philosophical lie; what man by bitter experience has discovered to be his condition, it assumes to be his condition. LECT. II.] THE DESTROYER CONFOUNDED. 179 "1 VTlBirt dare we admit the genuineness of that other page in the book of human experience which the Siva worshippers would blot out ? The Incarnation answers this question ; affirms the Preserver to be the Lord of all; affirms Him through the whole course of His government to have been upholding this earth and those who dwell upon it ; to have been interfering for their rescue. Here, in this very Incarnation, and that which follows from it, is the assertion of his complete dominion ; the answer to the Destroyer's claim to be in any sense the Creator, to have any dominion whatso- ever over that race which has paid him such fearful homage. That which meets us first in the records of the life of the Son of Man upon earth, after He had been declared to be the Son of God, is a conflict, which no human eye could behold, with the Destroyer; next, the testimony which He gave outwardly of the truth He had in that secret battle made good, by delivering the bodies and spirits of men out of their bondage to inward miseries and inward tyrants. Yet never for an instant did He speak of the claim which He put forth for the dominion of the Gracious Preserver and Father, as a new claim. Never when He spoke of setting up His Kingdom did he admit that He was not King of kings and Lord of lords before. The Jewish calling and economy had been asserting for generations the fact that the Lord, the Lord God,, merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and of great mercy, forgiving iniquity, transgressions, and sin, was the one Lord i that He had 180 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. taken this nation to be His, to make them witnesses of His righteousness and government; that every one who received His Kevelation of Himself, who submitted to Him, and trusted in Him, was thereby brought into a righteous state, was thereby enabled to understand the purpose of His government, and to receive the blessings of it. VI. Trust in this Being lay at the foundation of the life of the Jewish people. That trust involved Sacrifice. They gave up themselves; so they rose out of the dominion of that Spirit of self-will to which others were paying homage ; so they were able in their daily acts to resist him, and defy him, and to declare that neither in himself, nor in any of his innumerable forms, images, apparitions, had he any title to the obedience of God's servants. The Jew was taught that he was devoted, sacrificed to this Lord, who had chosen his nation, who preserved it from generation to generation, who exercised righteousness and judgment in all the earth. It was He who called the priest, appointed his vocation ; to Him he was to bring the sacrifices for himself and his nation; to Him, and to no visible things ; to Him, and to no unrighteous, hateful power. Sacrifice was the bond of the nation's existence ; sacrifice the act by which man realised his place in it, and came to understand its privileges. The meaning, the law, the ground, of sacrifice was interpreting itself to the conscience and reason of the true Israelite by every step of his discipline, by every act of obedience, by his sin, by his repentance. More and more he felt it to LECT. II.] SACRIFICES— TO NO VISIBLE POWER. 181 be the law of the universe; apart from which its very existence is a contradiction ; since only in perfect submission to the perfect Will can any creature attain its hfe and freedom. He was prepared therefore for that announcement which the Apostles of our Lord made so boldlyj that the Son of the Father, the Deliverer of Man, had offered himself a perfect Sacrifice to God ; that He had accomplished this act by entering into all the miseries of man ; that with this loving filial sacrifice He who was perfect Love was well pleased; that in it was the Atonement and Reconciliation of all Creation to Him, through its original Head; that in the strength of it each man might offer himself to God as a reasonable, holy, acceptable sacrifice. I hope I have shown in these last hints that if the other portions of the faith of the Hindoos have that which answers to them in ours, their faith in the might and blessing of Sacrifice is one in which we are bound with all our hearts to participate. If there be any acts in past or present ages on which we can think with delight, which we can be sure had Christ's mark upon them, which have wrought mightily, though in general secretly, for the deliverance of men from idols, from intellectual or spiritual plagues, here has been the root and spring of them. But it is just in the point of deepest sympathy with this ancient people that we arrive at the secret of our opposition. Upon the question to whom the sacrifice should be offered, whether by it we propitiate a Siva, or surrender our- selves in faith and trust to Him who cares for us and 182 THE EELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [paet ii. loves us; whether it is to overcome the reluctance of an enemy, or is the offering of our own reluctant wills to a Father in the name of one who has presented and is ever presenting His own filial and complete Sacrifice — upon "this issue, let us understand it well, our con- troversy with Hindooism turns. The idea of a Kehama obtaining a power from his gods which they cannot afterwards resist to curse and plague his fellow-men, is involved in the one doctrine, and is ready at any moment to come forth in a form of terrific wickedness, in the likeness of some Man-God. The Agony of the Garden, the spirit of the 22nd Psalm; the. Cross of Him who became nothing that the power, and grace, and wisdom of God might through Him shine forth upon all creatures; here we see the Christian Sacrifice, the sacrifice of the God-Man. This Spirit of Sacrifice He promises to all who are made the sons of God in Him. Everything then depends in our dealings with the Hindoos — let me add, everything in our deal- ings with ourselves — ^upon the degree in which we grasp this distinction, or lose sight of it. I showed you that we are open to all Mahometan temptations. So are we to all Hindoo temptations. We may exalt a priestly caste, as if it were set up to make the rest of men Sudras; we may dwell upon the privilege of holding intercourse with the Divine Being, till we sink into self- worshippers ; we may revenge ourselves for this abstract idolatry by plunging into outward idolatry; we may at last bow down before Siva, who we should have known was in all these ways drawing us into his LECT. 11.] CHRISTIAN HINDOOISM. 183 worship, since every act of pride, spiritual, intellectual, sensual, is a mystery of his worship. These dangers have discovered themselves in former periods of the world ; seeing that they appertain to human nature, we may be as liable to them as those who lived in any country or age. Is it an escape from them to deny the existence of a priesthood, to say that intercourse with heaven is a dream, to scoff at all popular feelings, to maintain that the conscience of evil is nothing, that sacrifices are a mockery ? Or rather, is the escape from them to maintain that a priesthood exists for the purpose of raising men above animal degradation, as a witness of the great rights of humanity; that, because intercourse with heaven was intended for the spirit of man, and has been made possible for men, therefore lowliness and self-abasement are our most proper and reasonable conditions; that poor and rich, priests and Sudras, have been alike looked upon, sympathised with, redeemed, raised to human privileges, by Him who took the nature of all ;' that every man may be delivered from an evil con-lj science, that he may renounce and scorn the authority! of the evil spirit, that he may offer himself in Christ's* name to God? Thiols the_alternative for India andj for England. In other words, the question is, whether we hold a system of opinions or a revelation from God. All Brahminical acts, services, sacraments, imply an effort or scheme on the part of the creature to raise himself to God. All Christian acts, services, sacraments, imply that God has sought for the creature that He .\ 184 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part ii. might raise him to Himself. The differences in our thoughts of God, of the priest, of the sacrifice, all go I back to this primary difference. When we get into the region of conceptions and speculations, all our views of that which is divine will be fragmentary; some of them will be very dark, because they are derived from our own experience ; either these become predominant, or in seeking to rid durselves of them we deny facts and extinguish great portions of our own being. To believe really, practically, that God is light and in Him is no darkness at all, we must believe that He has caused this light to arise and shine ; we must seek to walk in it, and to see all things by it. In my second Lecture, I referred to the condition of the Britons, who had parted with their original faith and had received Eoman civilisation, when they were no longer protected by Roman arms. I said the example was one which the statesmen of British India would do well to ponder. To abolish human sacrifices is good ; but a blank will be left in the nation's heart even by the loss of such practices as these, which must be filled up, or we shall impoverish those whom we seek to reform. But there is another, sadder side of this history, one which refers not to the conquered, but to the conquerors. Britain uttered her groan because Rome could no longer send forth her legions. The hundred hands which had been stretched from east to west, from north to south, were palsied ; for the giant who moved them had become a child. And whence came this decay of strength? All the signs of it still belonged. LECT. II.] LESSONS FEOM EOMAN HISTORY. 185 to Rome. Fiom the city of Jerusalem to the city of York she had traversed the earth with her roads ; within her own walls were the mightiest trophies of art over nature. Her history told by what wonderful agencies human and natural, by how evidently divine an ordinance, her glory had been achieved. And to the gloss of civilisation had been added the gloss of Christianity. The Emperor had believed, when other help was failing, that in the might of the Cross he might still conquer. The sign was indeed there, but it was marked upon the standard, not written upon the hearts, of those rulers of the world. They saw not what it meant; how it interpreted and crowned all that had been great in their history hitherto; how it separated the real great from the real little; how it sanctified all those feelings of obedience, duty, rever- ence for unseen law, self-devotion, by which the city had risen from nothing ; how it poured contempt upon dominion, except as an instrument by which the highest might serve the lowest, upon glory, except as it grew out of humiliation, and was the exaltation of man above himself. The civilised Christian Roman had lost the heart, the reverence, the faith, which belonged to his rude Pagan ancestors; that Christianity and civilisation might be victorious, the miserable patrons of both were swept away. If it is so with us; if our civilisation merely consists in those outward conveniences and mechanical inven-,' tions which are the fruits of it, assuredly we shall', impart but that which we have ; we shall communicate 186 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. only our external polish to the natioas which we rule ; their inward condition under our hands will become less strong, less sound, than it was before. If our belief in Christianity floats upon the surface of our minds, just keeps itself alive by a few phrases and conventions in the multitude of our pursuits, if it offers no greater evidence of its vitality than the debates and controversies which it engenders, assuredly we cannot present it to the Hindoo with the slightest hope that he will receive it in exchange for a faith which, be it good or evil, has governed his life. Only if our cultiva- tion be of that kind which is truly human, which delights to discern the essential humanity of each nation, to honour it, to sympathise with it, shall we [understand that which is peculiar in our subjects, or reform that which is corrupt in them. Only if we have received the Gospel as the answer from heaven to inward perplexities which we have a thousand times tried to stifle, but could not; only if we have learnt that these perplexities are the groans of the human spirit within us crying for deliverance; can we with honest confidence speak to that spirit in whatever region it dwells, in whatever language, clear or inar- ticulate, it utters its voice, as one spake to it of old, " Say not. Who shall ascend up into heaven ? that is, to bring Christ down ; or, Who shall descend into the deep ? that is, to bring Christ again from the dead : for lo ! the word is nigh thee, in thy mouth and in thy heart, even the word of faith which we preach." 187 PAET II.— LECTUEE III. How this relation should he detected. The descent of the Spirit. Selation of tJie Christian Church to the Jewish. Supposed analogy to the relations of Buddhism viith Brahminism. The resemblances and difference between Christianity and Budd- hism. The Buddhist side of Christianity threatening its existence. How Christians may speak to Buddhists elsewhere, especially in China. rpHAT Buddha and Brahm are words of cognate if not of the same signification ; that Buddhism is nevertheless essentially opposed to Brahminism, seeing that it denies the existence of a priestly caste; that the Buddhists are scattered over many lands, and have adopted various forms of belief and opinion ; that their universal characteristic is reverence for the human intel- lect, which they think of as one, though dififused through many persons, and as having its central manifestation in the Lama; that Buddhism exists in China beside two other forms of opinion with which it does not combine — 1 have explained in my third Lecture of the First Part. It is now our business to inquire whether this system has any or what affinities with Christianity, If the inquiry is conducted fairly, it must satisfy certain conditions. The resemblance which we detect must be not in the superficial accidental parts of either faith, but in their radical and essential character- istics ; these must not be assumed by the inquirer on 188 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. his own authority, but must have some clear voucher that they are recognised as radical and essential charac- teristics by Buddhists and Christians respectively ; the likeness must not be to that side of Buddhism which coincides with Hindooism — otherwise we shall only be repeating the last Lecture — but to the opposite side. The festival of Whitsuntide is observed in all parts of Christendom; here in England, among the Protest- ants in the north of Europe, by the Romanists in the south, by Greeks and Armenians, by the descendants of English, French, and Spanish settlers in North and South America. It is felt by all these to commemorate a great event, the event which marks the establishment of the Christian Church in the world. They derive their notion of this event from the record of it in the second chapter of the Acts of the Apostles. There we are told, that on a certain day which had long been kept as a festival day among the Jews, numbers of them were gathered from various countries of Asia, Africa, and Europe, in the city of Jerusalem. In that city dwelt a body of priests divinely called, as its inhabitants believed, to this office, members of a priestly family. There were also authorised doctors and inter- preters of the law, whose words were received by the great mass of the people as oracles. On the day of Pentecost, says the writers of the Acts, a great body of the inhabitants of the city, and of the strangers from other lands, were drawn to a place near the LECT. III.] THE DAY OF PENTECOST. 189 temple, because they were told that a set of men, not priests, not doctors of the law, but inhabitants of the most despised part of Palestine, themselves of the lowest caste, Galilean fishermen, were speaking in different tongues the wonderful works of God. This power the Scripture declares was given them from on high. The Spirit of God had descended upon them; they spake with other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance. To the body thus endued it is said that a multitude joined themselves. They were regarded with more and more jealousy by the priests and doctors of the Jews. But they spread themselves through Palestine ; they went into other lands. Everywhere, they declared that they came in the power of the Spirit, who had thus broken down the barriers of language and race ; everywhere they said that this Spirit would be given to those who believed their message. Are we to conclude from this story that the Christian faith broke loose from the Jewish faith, as Buddhism broke loose from Brahminism ; that in each case there was a vehement reaction against caste narrowness and local boundaries; that in each case this reaction was associated with the recognition of a spirit dwelling in man? There may be much plausibility in such a notion ; for many reasons it would commend itself to certain modem philosophers. Only they would say, ' In order to make out this resemblance, it is necessary to divest the Scriptural story of its halo of mystery and marvel. Take it as it stands, and all you learn 190 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part n. from it is, that on a certain occasion a strange phe- nomenon was seen, unlike any that had previously occurred, or was to occur again ; at variance with the constitution of man and the dealings of his Creator. In that form it offers only a seeming analogy to the Buddhist doctrine ; seeing that the latter assumes the presence of a divine and diffusive spirit to be the proper characteristic of humanity, at least in its noblest state, and that on this ground it oversets the caste principle, not for a particular emergency, but altogether. If, however, you are inclined to admit that this is the confused narrative of a remarkable epoch in Jewish history (and, indeed, in the world's history) when there was awakened in the nation, or in a part of it, the consciousness, previously slumbering, of a capacity in men generally for that knowledge, which had been confined to the priests ; a narrative surrounded, as all Hebrew narratives are, with a divine machinery ; we will admit that you have established your case.' I submit that one part of this statement is quite incorrect. If I read the story as it stands, I shall not merely be told that a certain event- happened at a certain time and in a certain place; I shall be told that this event was the fulfilment of a promise made to the fathers of the Jewish nation; I shall be told that it was intended for those of that generation, and for their children. These assertions, it will be remem- bered, are very prominent in the discourse which the writer of the Acts of the Apostles attributes to St.. LECT. in.] rULPILMENT OF A PROMISE. 191 Peter. One therefore who believes his statement can- not look upon this descent of the Spirit, with all that was implied in the circumstances of it, as violating the laws of the human constitution, as an exception in the plan of the Creator. He must look upon it as expound- ing that constitution, as carrying out that plan. But on what grounds, it will be asked, can it be alleged that the principles set forth in the Jewish scriptures and the Jewish economy were asserted and realised by a transaction which seems to destroy the exclusive hierarchy, ultimately the exclusive national limitation, which lie at the root of them ? The answer to this question will, I believe, show that the afEnities of Christianity with Buddhism are much closer and more extensive than they would be on the hypothesis of the former being a rebellion against Judaism ; on the other hand, will explain wherein the difference between them consists, and what that ' miraculous halo ' which is imputed to the Scripture narrative, has to do with it. We turn to the earliest of the Jewish records, and we find it declared that God made man in His own image, and gave him dominion over all the other crea- tures He had formed. Before a word has been said about the difference of one people from another, here is a broad fundamental assertion respecting man as man. Perhaps you will say, ' Yes ; but this is set at nought by one which immediately follows it; the fall of Adam is the real, though the creation of man may be the nominal, beginning of the history.' As we are 192 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. examining these records to find what they actually affirm, I consider the simplest, nay, the only honest method is to take them as beginning where they seem to begin, not to assume a starting-point of our own. It will then be seen more clearly whether they have a connection with each other, or are only a collection of Sibylline leaves ; whereas, if we insist that the Divine drama opens at a certain chapter, and that all which precedes is prologue, we do not find the connection, but make it. The arrangements of divines may demand such violence upon the text ; but I do not think it is ever justified by the conscience of simple and devout Christians. I believe they would be shocked to the last degree if you insist in plain language upon their believing that the constitution of God was nullified, destroyed, or even at all affected, by the evil acts of man. Undoubtedly, there is the fullest, most imme- diate recognition of the fact that evil entered into the world. There is no tampering with experience, no attempt to represent the universe as something else than it is, in order to make it accord with the account of its origin. There is no hint of a golden age, during which sin and death were not upon the earth. We are told that the very first man forgot that he was made in the image of God; yielded to the temptation of an inferior creature; came under death. He denied the law after which he was created. And each of his descendants is shown to have the same propensity to obey that which he was meant to rule ; to disbelieve LECT. III.] RECOGNITION OF EVIL IN THE BIBLE. 193 in Him whom he was meant to obey. But neither the first man nor any of his successors could make this degradation and disobedience anything else than an anomaly and a contradiction. The worst man in Scrip- ture is never represented as evil in any other sense than because he fights against the law under which he exists, and of which his very transgression is the continual witness. And therefore in the Bible God is ever repre- sented as addressing Himself to the creature whom He had formed, as awakening in him by His voice a consciousness of his right condition. He is represented as speaking thus to Adam when, he was hiding himself from His presence ; as speaking thus to Cain when he was meditating his crime, and when he had committed it. In each case it is assumed that the creature addressed stood in a direct relation to the Creator, however he might be denying it, and determining to shut himself out from it. And I need scarcely remind you, that he is treated, after the fall as well as before it, as still intended to have dominion over the earth and the animals upon it. The ground is cursed for his sake : in the sweat of his brow he must tni it; but he does till it — he does subdue it. He is continually disposed to treat it as his master, but he is compelled to act as if it were his slave ; compelled at the same time to remember that its power of pro- ducing nourishment for him depends not upon himself, but upon an Unseen "Will, which he is ever inclined to lose sight of The punishment of the race when lust M. B. L. O 194 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ir. and violence had spread over it, the preservation of it in a family, the blessing under which the sons of Noah go forth to replenish the earth and to subdue it, the confusion of their purpose of dwelling together in one plain when they were meant to people the earth, bear witness to the same principle. Man, the race of Man, is treated as formed in the image of God, as intended for rule over the creatures. Now if this h6 the case with respect to the records of the period preceding the Call of Abraham, those which follow can only be understood on the same prin- ciple. 'The history of the chosen people does not record an outrage upon mankind for the sake of one portion of it ; it is the history of men taken out of darkness into the light, made conscious of their own -state, as created in the image of God and meant to have dominion over the earth. A Mesopotamian shep- herd is called the friend of God ; in him all the families of the earth are to be blessed. Out of his family grows a nation. It is a witness to all nations against the separate idolatrous worship which is dividing them. Its members are taught to believe that God Himself is their King — the Unseen God of all the earth. They are not in some unnatural condition because they are taken under His government; their lives are simple, natural, orderly, in proportion as they remember it; confused and irregular when they forget it. As the history of the nation goes on, there are continually new discoveries of evil tendencies, of an evil nature, in the LECT. III.] MAN MADE IN GOD'S IMAGE. 195 members of it. They are not different from the rest of the world; they are equally idolatrous, equally selfish, equally corrupt. Where then is their advan- tage ? The Lord of All has revealed Himself to them ; He has taken them into covenant; they may trust Him. In trusting Him they rise above these selfish and idolatrous tendencies, they become truly men. The Jewish Prophet, when he is most overwhelmed with his own evil and with the evil of his nation, obtains most apprehension of the truth that God will exhibit His perfect Image to men, in a Man, and will so confound all the images they have made. Except such an Image were really presented to them in a Man — except it were really shown to be true that Man was made in the Image of God, and had dominion over the creatures, and. that Death and Evil were not his masters, the visions of Jewish seers were delusions. But St. Peter, when he spoke to the Jews on the day of .Pente- cost, was firmly assured that a Man had appeared in the world who was the perfect Image of the Unseen God. He believed that this Person had been declared in the waters of baptism to be the Son of God ; that the Spirit of God had descended upon Him; that in the strength of that Spirit he had exercised dominion over the powers of nature, over man's spiritual enemies ; had passed through death, had ascended to the right hand of His Father. That He should give His Spirit to men, to make them the sons of God in Him ; to restore them to God's Image ; to give them power over 196 THE KELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. the earth ; to constitute them the masters, and not the subjects, of visible things; — this seemed' to him the right and reasonable fulfilment of express promises which were contained in the Jewish Scriptures, and of all their meaning. With equal certainty he said, that the promise would be to them and to their children. He was sure that the Spirit of God had taken possession of the powers and energies and speech of men. He was sure that in yielding to that Spirit he was obeying no strange, unnatural impulse, but was submitting to his proper guide and teacher, to the Author of all order and peace and unity. More than this, perhaps, he may not have perceived. To see in this gift the witness for a great human fellowship, to see all that it implied re- specting man's creation and his redemption was perhaps reserved, more perfectly, for another Apostle. Through intense personal humiliation and suffering did the Apostle Paul learn that Christ by His death and resur- rection and ascension had justified man before God; that the Spirit of God was given, not only as the ful- filment of all promises which had been made to the fathers of the Jewish nation, but as the fulfilment of the original law of his creation, when He made all things in Christ Jesus, with the intent of finally gather- ing them all together in Him. In his Epistles we find him brought into contact with men of different habits, philosophies, and educations. The old mythologies had prepared them very readily to recognise an inspira- LECT. III.] BUDDHISM OF THE GOSPEL. 197 tion from God ; the .sages very readily recognised the worth of the individual soul in man : but the inspiration which the first admitted was sudden and casual, the honour which the other paid to the soul was solitary, exclusive, self-exalting. He spoke of a Spirit of God as given to dwell continually in man ; to be the source in him of all knowledge, faith, love; the strength for all ordinary toils, the comforter in all sorrows, the power of exploring the unseen and the future. He spoke of this Spirit as calling forth a spirit in man, in the indi- vidual man, which lifts him above himself, which he cannot call his own, which belongs to him as the child of God, the member of a universal family — " the spirit of MAN which is in him." That profound feeling of reverence for the human spirit, then, which we have discovered in the Buddhist, his belief in the mighty capacities of this spirit, his determination to recognise these capacities as belonging to the race, not to some one section or class of it, his assurance that the spirit in man cannot be circum- scribed by the limits of time or space, or by the measures and conditions of individual feeling and con- sciousness, his conviction that this human spirit must, in some mysterious manner be divine, has its full jurisdiction in Christianity. And every subordinate idea which has grown out of these in the mind of the Buddhist has that which answers to it in the Gospel. He believes that it is the privilege of the divine man to contemplate the Divinity in His purity. The highest 198 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. view which St. Paul takes of the privileges of Christian men, in consequence of the gift which had been bestowed upon them, is that they might know God; his most earnest prayer, that they might increase in this know^ ledge. The Buddhist believes that, in order to the attainment of such knowledge, the mind must be separated from outward, sensual things. Sanctification, the deliverance of the heart and mind from earthly temporal influences, that they may enter into the enjoy- ment of that which is unseen and eternal, is the very work which the writers of the New Testament, with one accord, attribute to the Holy Spirit who had been given them. The Buddhist however, feeling that he must, in some way, study the universe, and account for the facts which he observes in it, was led to perceive the necessity of a power which originates or begets, a capacity which receives, a bond which unites them. The Scriptures, too, suppose a power which creates, a power in the creature which receives ; the Scriptures contemplate the union and co- working of these powers as the condition of health in all that exists ; they show how all destruction in the human voluntary creature has come from his will not yielding itself to the divine, creating, inspiring Will ; how all restoration comes from their being again brought into accordance. They speak of the deepest ground of all things being the awful union of the Father with the Son in the Spirit. Again, we heard of holy men appearing as benefactors of different portions of the globe ; their footsteps traced LECT. III.] BUDDHISM OF THE GOSPELi 199 upon earth, yet their home seeming to be somewhere else. What they are is known chiefly by what they have done; their acts are palpable, a mystery hangs about themselves. They are called Buddhas ; though they appear in places and times far apart, the same wisdom, the same power, dwells in them all ; they must be the wisdom and power of Buddha; they can belong to no other. Even thus do Christians speak of those who in far-off ages, in various latitudes, have shed light into the hearts of men, have cheered the poor in the midst of their sore trials with help for the present, hope for the future, have restrained triumphant evil, and laboured that righteousness and truth might flourish. These we hold to be all partakers of the self-same Spirit; in their words and acts they manifest its presence ; care not to be great in themselves, but do homage to a mysterious greatness, from which all that seems such in themselves is derived ; show that they have their work on earth, their citizenship in the heavens. Once more, the Buddhist affirms that there must be some person, and that a human person, in whom the perfect wisdom resides. He need not in his earthly appearance be glorious ; he may wear the form of a child ; but the Power must be within, and must so reveal itself that men shall see the Divine Priest is there. Even thus it is the clearest, most invariable proclamation in the Gospel, that each man, in his best, purest estate, does but utter some portion of the Divine Mind, does but exhibit some one partial image of the 200 THE RELIGIONS OF THE "WORLD, [part ii. Divine Character ; that there is one perfect Utterance of that voice, one perfect Image of that substance, one in whom the Fulness pleased to dwell, one who humbled Himself to the cradle of Bethlehem, to the Cross of Calvary ; who in that cradle, and on that Cross, showed forth the Divine glory : and who, because He humbled Himself, has been exalted to be the High Priest of our race for ever. But as we have seen this relation between Buddhism and Christianity coming out before us with increasing brightness, we must, I think, have become also more and more conscious of some difference, which, whatever it be, is a deep and radical one. The philosophical objectors told us that if we could separate the story of Pentecost from its ' mythical ' accidents, the sound of the rushing mighty wind, the cloven tongues, the notion of a particular endowment bestowed by Jesus Christ at that particular moment on His disciples, we should arrive at an intelligible result, which might throw some light upon Buddhist and other history. I complained of this statement so far as it represents the events of that day as isolated, as inconsistent with principles recognised in the Jewish economy, as importing that the in-dwelling of a Spirit in man is not implied in his original constitution. Subject to these remarks, I now admit that they are right in looking upon these miraculous circumstances as indicative of the difference between the Scriptural and the Buddhist conception of the spiritual endowments of human creatures. The LECT. III.] BUDDHISM AND CHKISTIANITY. 201 Buddhist starts from the hur aan g round ; assumes the existence or possibility of certain qualities and attributes of a divine nature in man ; supposes the man, in virtue of these, to hold intercourse with the Divinity. The Scripture starts from the divine ground ; assumes that man according to his constitution is nothing but an image ; denies that he can originate anything ; sets forth a revelation of his Creator to him as the found- ation of his knowledge, of his life ; represents all faculties, powers, energies of the creature as gifts of the Creator. Upon this difference every other depends. If the first view be the right one, there can, of course, be no divine manifestation, for there is nothing to mani- fest. The Creator does not witness to men by visible signs that He is the Author of these gifts, for He is not the Author of them, or He does not design to make them know that He is. If the other view be true, these (so-called) miracles, these exercises of power, these signs of a Presence, are precisely the methods which commend themselves to the conscience and reason of mankind as the most fitted — I had nearly said as the only possible — witnesses of a truth, which, when it has been once testified of in this way, can hereafter be held as certain and abiding, though there be no startling signs of it at all. Now, as Buddhism and Christianity are the respective exemplifications of these two methods, it may be well to consider the practical results of each. You will see, I trust, my object. I do not desire to make out a 202 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. charge against Buddhism on the ground of its moral deficiencies ; but, I want to ascertain how far these deficiencies are or are not owing to this characteristical feature of it, that more than any other system the world has ever seen, it makes the belief of a Divine power working in man its ground, and ascends fropa ' that ground to any apprehension it may entertain respecting the Divinity Himself. 1. One leading contrast offers itself instantly to our notice. The Buddhist believes that a Divine wisdom and power dwells, or may dwell, in human beings, and that its dwelling constitutes them heroic spirits, saintly men. The New Testament begins with teaching us what kind of Spirit this must be ; what manner of Being He is from whom this Spirit proceeds; what must be the manner of His working in creatures who submit to His government. It speaks of the Spirit of Him who had declared Himself for ages to the Jews as the God of Truth and Righteousness ; it speaks of the Spirit of Him who gave His Son for men. It sets forth the character of this Spirit by His life, in whom it is said to have dwelt without measure. If holiness was more characteristic of Him than power, the Spirit of holiness is the name by which we are taught to express it most uniformly and perfectly. If meekness, humility, gentleness, were the essential qualities of His life, the Spirit is known as the Spirit of meekness, humility, gentleness; these are declared to be the fruits of its operations. If His whole life was an act of self- LECT. III.] THE BUDDHIST'S DILEMMA. 203 sacrifice, His Spirit is set forth as the power whereby man is able to offer himself a sacrifice. If Love was the source and end of His sacrifice, it is the Spirit of Love which he promises to those who obey Him. Not that these assertions in the least interfere Avith the other equally prominent one, that He is the Spirit of Truth and Knowledge ; that all powers and exercises of mind, and their direction, are from him. No one brings out that assertion more clearly than St. Paul ; but he winds up the enumeration of gifts and powers in these words: "And yet I show you a more excellent way. Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as a sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal." Love is in his teaching, as in his life, the highest manifestation of the presence of the Spirit, because God, from whom it proceeds, is Love. II. All this difference, you see, is grounded upon the difference between the naked idea of a Spirit dwelling in man and identical with himself, and the idea of Him as given to men by the Eternal God through His Son. Look now at the difference as to another point, the estimate of human creatures. To the Buddhist those whom he believes thus endowed necessarily become gods; they can be nothing else. And thus, he who starts with the rejection of an hereditary priesthood as an intolerable yoke, because men, as men, have the capacity of seeing God and worshipping Him, ends by becoming the poor servant and tool of a priesthood. All who can exhibit the intellectual power which he 204 THE EBLIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part ii. feels is of right his, and yet which he is conscious that he does not actually possess, must be objects of his obedience and his worship. He has no standard with which he can compare what they are and what they do; he is sure that there must be some who enjoy intercourse with the unseen world; they cannot tell him what the intercourse means, what the result of it is, how he can be the better for it. They seem to say, some of them actually say, and wish him to understand that at all events they are marking out a Tie plus ultra to his inquiries, " Beyond us lies a void of Nothingness." Into that void the listening disciple has no temptation to enter. What can he do but accept these finite temporary priests as the best substitutes for the Infinite which he longs for and yet shrinks from ? They at least keep alive the appetite, they save him from utter despair. Such is the condition of those who can only contemplate the Spirit which they feel is meant for man as in man. The Christian is taught to think of this Spirit as in God, as coming forth from Him. He is taught that he may ask God continually for the quickening and renewing of it in himself, and in all the family to which he belongs. He is told that when the Comforter comes He shall convince the world of Sin, of Righteousness, of Judgment ; that He shall not become identical with the man himself, but shall show him his evil ; shall raise him out of that evil into a Righteousness which is above him, which is in one who is gone to the Father; shall give him the continual LECT. III.] THE TRUE PRIEST AND PROPHET. 205 assurance of a final separation between that which is true and that which is false. III. Thus the promise of the Spirit- is the promise to a man of a power to overlook his own mind, to judge its acts and movements, to know what in it requires to be cut off, what is wrought in God. Every human beart is to be the subject of it ; no creature belonging to the race for which Christ died is meant to be defrauded of this mighty illumination. But no one who receives it can pretend to be thereby exalted above his fellows ; his knowledge is the knowledge of his own individual abasement; of that glory which he shares with his kind in Christ. And therefore the Scripture, in strict conformity with this idea, represents all intel- lectual gifts as bestowed, not to raise one man above another, but simply that men may be enabled to serve each other. The highest of all is the servant of all. He who holds his gifts under this condition,- and con- fesses his unfitness for the use of them, is a fellow- worker with the Divine Spirit. He is doing that which he was sent here to do. He who uses them for any other end, who holds them on any other condition, practically disowns the blessing and its Author. The priest and the prophet [come tinder this rule. They especially are to look upon themselves as called by Him who is the deliverer of men out of their confusion and darkness, to an ofiSce under Him, as endowed with powers by Him to fulfil this office. So far as the priest or the prophet looks upon all the ability he possesses 206 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [paet ii. as a gift, the object of which is determined by the character of the giver, and the nature of His work, so far he is a true priest and true prophet : assuming his ability as his property, he becomes a false priest, a false prophet ; in the language of Scripture, a wolf and not a shepherd, a destroyer of men, not their deliverer. IV. But the conception of the Lama supplies us with the most perfect illustration of the difference I am endeavouring to point out. In him is gathered up that spirit of humanity which the Buddhist worships, and from which he deduces his divinity. The Christian affirms that He in whom the priesthood of the universe rests is the eternal Son of God, that He took human nature, united it to God, endued it with that Spirit which dwelt without measure in Himself He, they declare, is the Head of many members, through each of which, so long as it abides in Him, the- same life- blood is transmitted. The former notion, grounded upon a true and deep feeling that there must be a centre or that there can be no fellowship, assumes the centre anywhere — in a child or old man — and demands implicit faith that there all intelligence rests. The other, starting from the fact that humanity has a centre above itself, declares how He who claimed to be this centre, in poverty, weakness, contempt made good his title, by proving that He could deliver the spirit of man out of its fetters, that in owning Him to be its Lord it attained the freedom it was sighing for. The one notion, glorifying the intellect and spirit of man, insists upon their doing homage to the meanest object LECT. III.] CONTRADICTIONS— HOW RECONCILED. 20Y ■which they create for themselves to worship ; the other, humbling the intellect and spirit of man before one who has established his right to be their master, offers them an expansion and exaltation of which the know- ledge and love of an absolute and perfect Being are the only limits. V. Thus the society of the Buddhist has no bond except the existence of something mysterious in the creatures who belong to it : feeling this to be insufH- cient, he invents an external supremacy, and endues it with attributes which he knows it does not possess; he makes a lie, and the lie avails him nothing, for the three hundred millions which own it compose only a mass of atoms without any principle of cohesion, though they are ever seeking one. The Christian Ecclesia confesses by its very name that its existence has its ground in the call of an Almighty Being ; that it stands only by His will ; that it is distinguished from a divided world to be a witness of that true glory which man possesses when he looks upward, not downward, to a Master, not to himself; that, having such a call and being such a witness, it is baptised with a Spirit of power and truth and love, who by it would bring all men into the divine fellowship which embraces all peoples, tongues, kindreds — from which no one can, except by an act of self-will, be excluded. VI. I might perhaps leave the comparison here drawn to work its way upon the consciences and hearts of all who love truth and freedom and their kind, in deed more than in word. But the subject is so tran- 208 THE EELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part ii. scendantly important at this time, that I must present it still in one or two other lights. The first is this. Buddhism, you see, necessarily excludes Mahometanism and Hindooism. It is the direct contradiction of the former; Mahometanism basing the universe xipon the distinctness and absoluteness of God. Its antipathy to the second is the great fact of its history, the explan- ation of its existence. It denies the reality of that distinction which is involved in the doctrine of the twice-born man, as opposed to the ordinary man. And now we find it cannot sustain those pretensions to spirituality, on account of which it is at war with the unspiritual Mahometan, or that pretension to humanity and freedom from priestcraft, on account of which it is at war with the exclusive Brahmin. It sets their ideas at nought; it utterly fails in realising its own. But we have been led to think that ideas which have exer- cised such a sway over multitudes of human beings, from generation to generation, must be realised in some way. Our philosophers have taught us to pay this homage to the thoughts of our fellow-men ; we bless them for the lesson; we are ashamed of not having learnt it sooner, of not having rather imparted it to them. I beseech you seriously to ponder this question. How may these ideas be realised ? How may they be reconciled ? And if you should, after much thinking^ find that this ancient Revelation which you were going to cast aside as one of the false and worn-out systems of the world, supplies that realisation and reconciliation — supplies them because it is a Revelation — on that LECT. III.] THE AUTHORITY OF A FATHER. 209 ground and no other — then be sure that if you do cast it aside, or wish to prove it something else than revela- tion, the reason is not that you care for what is expan- sive and comprehensive, that you hate what is formal and narrow ; this is not any longer the ground of your opposition. Will you then with great earnestness ask yourselves what it is ? VII. Perhaps, however, we have been speaking only of a verbal reconciliation ; you want one which shall be practical ; one which may bear to be tried on a great scale. Let us see, then, whether the case of China, a country which you will allow to be practical at least in its aim, to offer quite sufficient room for a large experi- ment, may not supply what you require. If you did hear of a people which had had for ages the strongest conviction that the authority of the Father was the one foundation of society, but had never been able to connect this conviction with the acknowledgment of anything mysterious and divine ; of a society which for ages had not been able to prevent a certain body of its subjects from dreaming that there is a mysterious and divine Word or Reason speaking to the wise man, out of which dream, however, no fruits had proceeded but impostures and delusions; if you were told, that into the heart of this society Buddhism had come, with its strange testimony of a Spirit in the human race, the ordinary manifestations of which are seen in very ignorant priests, its perfect manifestation often in an infant; if you heard that these doctrines had never been able to combine, and yet that no one could succeed 210 THE EELIGIONS OP THE WOELD. [part ii. in banishing the other from an empire in which order and unity are prized as the highest blessings of all, nay, that experience had proved to reluctant sages, that none of these elements of discord could safely be extinguished, that each was in some strange way needful to the per- manence of that which it seemed to imdermine: — and if after this you heard of a faith which assumed that the ground of all things and all men is a Father ; that He has spoken and does speak by his Filial Word to the hearts and spirits" of men, so making them wise, and separating them from what is base and vain ; that this Filial Word has been made flesh and dwelt among men, and has given them power to become sons of God ; and that through Him a Spirit is given to dwell with men, to raise up a new spirit in them, to unite them to each other, to make them living portions of a living body; that men are actually admitted by a simple rite into a Name expressive of their adoption by the Father, their separation by the Word, their inspiration by the Spirit ; that in this Name stood a universal fellowship, which upheld the authority of earthly fathers upon the ground of the .divine relation, which asserted the dis- tinction of wise and foolish, good and evil men, upon the ground of their following or disobeying the monitions of that Filial Teacher, from whom all right human instructors derived the power whereby they were able to make good and useful scholars, which maintained the intercourse and communion of human beings upon the ground of their obedience to the Spirit of order and harmony : — if, I say, these two sets of facts were lECT. III.] CHBISTIAN BUDDHISM. 211 presented to you side by side, would not you feel there was some strange adaptation in the one to the other; that there was in the last the secret principle and power for which it was evident from the former that China had through centuries been asking in vain? VIII. But why do I speak thus ? Does it not sound like the idlest of all visions to talk of our converting Buddhists, when, judging from various indications, they are far more likely to convert us ? I have not disguised from you the Buddhist side of Christianity; I have rejoiced to set it forth, as I rejoiced to set forth the Mahometan and Hindoo sides of it. But, as we saw that either of these elements might in any age become the predominant, almost the exclusive one, it is needful that we should consider well how this third doctrine may in former days have crushed, may crush in our own, every other. Assuredly, there are distinct traces of prevalent triumphant Buddhism in the Christian Church of periods gone by. The history of Orders rising up to reform society, to rebuke organised priest- hoods for their self-indulgence, coldness, exclusiveness, to assert the rights of the poor, to maintain that every member of Christ's flock has a calling to benefit the rest ; beginning thus nobly, and then sinking into more intolerable despots than those against whom they pro- tested, self-exalted in their gifts, their knowledge, their ignorance, their poverty; deceiving, and being deceived; drawing all reverence to themselves on the score of their humility, holding down the poor in 212 THE BELIQIONS OF THE WORLD. [paet ii. slavery, whom they came to deliver : — ^this history con- tains one class of such phenomena. In the history of Mysticism and Quietism, telling how men beginning to seek God with earnest hearts, to denounce the idola- trous notions others had formed of Him, to retire into the seciret chamber that there might be no hindrance from outward things to the clearness of the vision, to mortify their flesh that it might not stand in their way, went on till their hearts grew puffed up and proud, till they began to boast of wonderful discoveries vouch- safed to them alone, till they became the subjects of all nervous impressions, fantasies, disorders, more sensual than those whom they charged with being so ; how at last they gazed on vacancy, and felt, if they had not honesty to say, ' The vision is gone, we see nothing : ' — here we find Christian Buddhism in another manifesta- tion. And the lessons which these two records supply are not obsolete; either of these temptations may assault any of us again; in some form is perhaps assaulting all of us. IX. But chiefly should we be careful to note what common principle it was which in each of these cases turned so much seeming truth into a curse; for it is of that we have need to beware, in whatever dress it may come, or if our especial work should be to encounter it in its nakedness. Unquestionably the member of the Order and the soHtary mystic alike yielded to the feeling, 'It is this power in me, this faculty of government,' this faculty of vision, which is the great thing of all. How glorious to belong to this LBCT. III.] ITS LATEST FORM— TREATMENT OP IT. 213 great society, for which I am ready to live and die ; how glorious to have this capacity of conversing with the Infinite, for the sake of which I have cheerfully resigned all things ! ' Who could think that the dead- liest poison was lurking in such words as these ; that there could be the essence of all pride in such self- sacrifice? But what if men should say boldly, 'It is this power in me which is really the great power of all ; it is this eye in me which creates the object it seems to behold. I will acknowledge nothing else, worship nothing else.' What if this should be the language which men lisped a few years ago, and now begin to speak distinctly? Then surely there will gradually appear most of the other signs which we have traced in Buddhism, and many which could not appear in it, or in any heathen system. First, the formation of an intellectual priesthood more utterly without the sense of a vocation, more simply glorying in its powers, there- fore more intolerant, exclusive, oppressive, than any other with which this earth has ever been cursed. Next, the consciousness in that exclusive priesthood of a want of sympathy with actual men, notwithstanding their boast of humanity in the abstract ; therefore an attempt to supply this want, as it always has been supplied, by devices to meet the taste of the vulgar, by prodigies, portents, sorceries; physical mysteries being called in as a compensation for the absence of divine mysteries ; science being degraded into an instru- ment of basest imposture. Finally, intellectual worship, after giving birth to all forms of empiricism, ending at 214 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part it. last in the elevation of some merely brute power to the throne of the universe ; a power which will prove by its triumph, that if intellect, freedom, humanity, have no better protectors than themselves, they must be trampled down ; will prove, as we are well assured, by its ultimate discomfiture, that they have another Protector, Him from whom all good and perfect gifts have come. X. But it will avail little to call up such visions as these, however certain we may feel from the. testimony of history that they will one day show themselves to be realities, if they lead us only to the denunciation of others, to a dread of the words which they speak, or of the acts which they do. Oftentimes I fear such denunciations and such dread conceal a very shallow faith in ourselves; oftentimes they indicate that we are sadly beset with that pride in our own intellectual powers which we attribute to others. Ourselves we need to suspect; our own half-belief in the truths of which we talk most loudly; our own readiness to substitute the conclusions of our understandings for the divine teaching. If we heartily confess these sins and repent of them we shall not magnify the operations of the divine Spirit less because some seem to contemplate them exclusively; we shall not be betrayed into the vulgar and deceitful policy of underrating the reason and faculties of men, because some seem to overvalue them ; we shall not fancy that we show great dexterity and piety when we force a feeling in one direction^ because its natural growth seems to be in another. LECT. m.] CONCLUSION. 215 Rather, we shall regard all the tendencies of particular periods with reverence as indications of God's will, how- ever perverted by man's ignorance and selfishness. When we meet with a fanatical exaltation of spiritual emotions, excitements, ecstacies, we shall be most anxious to assert the reality and universality of spiritual communications; to place them on their deepest ground, to show how utterly dreary man's condition would be without them. When we see a fanatical exaltation of human faculties, then most shall we be eager to assert their worth and sacredness ; to vindicate them from all aspersions grounded upon the imperfections which attach to them in this world ; to maintain that he who refuses them the noblest cultivation despises and blasphemes the Author of them. And that the truths proclaimed by raving sects and by idolaters of the intellect may both be preserved, we shall bring them into fellowship. The communication of the divine Spirit we shall believe to be the only means whereby the Reason, the Heart, the Understanding, are enabled to perform their rightful functions, to be vigorous, calm, pure, in harmony with the mind of the Creator, and with all that is truly human. Holding all power as a trust, every office as a stewardship, believing that the divine Spirit itself who dwells with us is the greatest trust, the most awful stewardship, we shall feel more the glory of our race because we feel more our own insignificance ; shall be more really men, because we walk more humbly with our God. 216 PART II.— LECTURE IV. The early preaching of the Gospel — how it affected Greehs, Egyptians, Romans, Goths. Form of this preaching. Besist- ance from, the doctrine of an Evil Principle. Mahometan protest against it, and for the sacredness of the outward world. Hindoo protest on behalf of a divine kingdom. Buddhist protest for an actual Indwelling Spirit. Modem infidel protest for hwmanity. Christianity established by all. Conclusion. TN former Lectures I have considered the relation in -*■ which Christianity stands to the existing religious systems of the world, to Mahometanism, Hindooism, Buddhism. In this, the last Lecture of the course, I ought, according to the plan which I laid down for myself, to consider in what relation it stands to those which I called the defunct systems — those of ancient Persia, Egypt, Greece, Rome, and the Gothic world. But it will strike you at once that this subject has, in a great measure, been anticipated. I could not allude to the facts which justified my use of the word 'defunct, in reference to these religions, without indicating the kind of influence which Christi- anity had exercised over them. I was obliged to tell you that the worship of the god of Light in Greece, the state religion of Rome, the worship of Odin amongst the Goths, had given way before the preaching of the LECT. IV.] EAELY CHRISTIANITY. 217 Crucified Son of God. I could not omit to notice the way in which the Gospel had estabhshed itself in the Greek cities of Egypt, or the influence it had received from the culture previously existing in them, or the resistance it had met with in the country districts where the old Egyptian doctrine had its strongest hold. I could not but speak of that revival of the Persian faith, which took place in the second century of the Christian era, of the obstruction which that faith offered to the Gospel, of its remarkable re-action upon some of the teachers of the Gospel. I should have no excuse for travelling again over this ground, though the observa- tion we took of it was so rapid and superficial, were it not that the facts to which I have just alluded, taken in connection with those which have engaged our atten- tion already, suggest painful doubts to the mind, doubts closely related to those which it has been the object of the whole course to examine. The aspect of Christianity in the first ages, notwith- standing the exceptions which I have noticed, is that of a youthful, growing, victorious doctrine ; its roots laid in the depths; its branches spreading over the earth, and reaching to heaven. But then came Mahometanism, utterly exterminating that Persian doctrine with which the Christian teachers had so unsuccessfully fought; bringing Egypt, great part of Asia, and a section of Europe, under its yoke. When we studied the history of this faith, we learnt that it had conquered much from the Gospel, and had scarcely, through twelve centuries, 218 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part ii. yielded to any permanent impression from it. The latter assertion is almost as true of Hindooism, in spite of the establishment of a Christian empire in the East; Buddhism still holds a third of the globe in almost undisturbed possession. Now a person comparing these two sets of facts will be very likely to say, ' Supposing your answers to the philosophical o"bjectors, who maintain that Christianity is a decaying, nearly obsolete, creed, to be ever so relevant and strong, yet what are they when weighed against this startling confirmation of their statements? Must not that faith have had a fitness for other ages, an unfitness for ours, which during six centuries accomplished so much, which now seems to be accomplishing almost nothing; which could then encounter the wisdom and power of those nations that we still recognise as having been the wisest and mightiest in the world, which now fails in a confiict with the ignorant and incoherent worshippers of Buddha. And if you escape by pleading that the human pro- fessors of this doctrine are less sincere and energetic than they were, what is this but saying that it depends on human energy ; that it is, in fact, a human system, strong whilst those who hold it are strong, sure to wither when their zeal withers ? ' Such an objection as this cannot be evaded. In considering it, I shall be led to examine the different steps we have taken, beginning with the question, How did Christianity address itself to the systems with which, in its infancy, it came into collision ? LECT. IV.] WITNESSES OF A LORD AND KING. 219 I am forced to use the word Christianity; for many purposes it is a convenient one. But I must remind you, that it is not a word which was familiar to the Apostles, or to those who succeeded them in the first ages. We are not told that they went forth preaching Christianity. The writer of the Acts of the Apostles says that .they preached the "Kingdom of God," or "the Gospel of God," or "Christ," or "the Gospel of Christ." To expound these words fully, would he to expound the New Testament. But this meaning lies upon the surface of them : the Apostles came witnessing of a Lord and King ; the Lord and King of men. The proclamation of the Crucified Man, as the Son of God, was their Gospel, or good tidings. In that character men were invited to receive Him. The Apostles believed their own words; they could therefore trust God to prove them true. If this man were the King of the world, strange and ridiculous as the proposition might sound in the ears of Jews or Heathens, He would be shown to be such by one means or other. Some of the Apostles knew nothing of the previous feelings and discipline of the nations; some, as the Apostle Paul, might have meditated on that subject, and have conversed much with men of different opinions. But all alike met the people among whom they came, not with arguments to prove this opinion true, or that false, but with the announcement of a Person who had a right to men's obedience, and whom it was good that they should obey. 220 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part ii. I. St. Paul at Athens encountered Epicureans and Stoics; he disputed with them in the market-place. When we are made acquainted with his words, we find they were of this kind, " Whom ye ignorantly worship^ Him declare I unto you." ' Your poets have said, that we are the offspring of God ; it is true ; therefore do not make Him after the likeness of things you see. He is not far from any of us; for in Him we Jive, and move, and have our being. He has appointed a day in the which He will judge the world by that Man whom He hath ordained ; whereof He hath given assurance unto all men, in that He hath raised Him from the dead.' This language, you see, assumed that the Athenians were in search of God; that they were ignorantly worshipping Him ; that they had a sense of His being a Father; that they wanted some one living, human image of Him, to supplant those images of Him which they had made for themselves. In Athens itself the words were littlei heeded ; men there were busy seeking for some new thing to talk of; they were occupied with schemes of the universe ; of realities they had lost the perception. But the teaching was adapted to all that was sound and true in the Greek mind; it met whatever wants that mind was conscious of. The Greek asked for one who should exhibit humanity in its perfection ; he was told of a Son of Man. He felt that whoever did so exhibit Humanity must be divine. The Son of Man was declared to be the Son of God. He had dreamed of one from whom the highest glory man could LECT. IV.] GOSPEL TO THE GREEKS. 221 conceive must have proceeded. He was told of a Father. He had thought of a divine Presence in every tree and flower. He heard of a Presence nearer still to himself. He was not told that he must cease to helieve in powers ruling in the Sun or Moon, or over any portion of the earth. The Apostles had no com- mission to declare there might not be such Powers, or whether they had actual personality ; they were not to deny the existence of kingly men upon the earth, or of angels or saints in the unseen world ; only they were to say, This Man is the King of kings, and Lord of lords. Of his fulness must they all have received who are any- thing, or ever were anything, here or elsewhere; their graces can only be a reflection from His grace. They were to say. He is nearer to you, more directly related to you, than all these can be; for He has taken the nature of all, and borne the sorrows and sins of all ; in Him there is nothing partial, nothing imperfect; no feebleness of sympathy in any single direction. They were to say further, If in any of the objects of your reverence there is anything earthly, sensual, evil ; any- thing belonging to human nature in its corruption : then that must be contrary to Him ; that must be at war with Him. So far as any creature is endued with such qualities, it is an evil creature ; it has the evil spirit ; it is not to be worshipped as if it were glorious, but renounced as devilish; as that which would draw you from the true estate into which Christ, by taking your nature, has redeemed you. Therefore the Greek 222 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WOULD, [part ii. mythology was met at all points by this Gospel. What- was actually or possibly good in it, the Revelation of Christ comprehended; what was evil and degraded it wrestled with, by proclaiming the good which it had counterfeited. But this was its charm, — The Greek had a world without a centre ; the preachers of the Gospel made the centre known to him. What could revolve about it, fell into its proper orbit; what determined to move independently of the centre, was seen to be unnatural and distracted. II. How the Gospel found its way into the Egyptian-, heart we are not informed so distinctly. This however we may remember ; — Our Lord spoke to His disciples in parables; through them he declared the mysteries of the kingdom. The facts of outward nature, the ordinary transactions of men, he recognised as a sacred writing, in which God had expressed part of his mean- ing, a meaning which he did not will to remain hidden, but which his Son unfolded. That the preachers of the Christian kingdom in Egypt should think much on this method of discovering the divine treasures was inevitable. But the substance of the communication was still the same. The Egyptian was questioning all nature to tell him of the Ammon, the hidden God : the Christian answer was still, " Him declare we unto you." III. So it fared likewise with the Roman, whose worship had really, as we saw, a different direction from that of the Greek,, however at various points they LECT. IV.] THE ROMAN.— THE GOTH. 223 might intersect each other. The clear intellect, the beautiful form, were not in his mind the constituents of Kinghood or Godhead. Order, self-government, the capacity of ruling others, submission of individual will to law, he demanded in the chief man; and qualities corresponding to these alone seemed to him divine. A faith without an organised harmonious society, was to the Latin a dream. After many struggles his own mighty commonwealth had felt that it could only continue to exist under the guidance of a single head ; and that head one uniting military and religious titles ; a ruler of armies, an object of adoration. A King, in whom was seen the perfect fulfilment of Law, the surrender of the individual Will to the Higher Will, the entire self-sacrifice ; a King who was the centre of a society, the head of many members, was proclaimed by the fishermen of Galilee, by the tent-maker of Tarsus. That announcement met Eoman life on all its sides and aspects; adopted its highest maxims; overreached its noblest idea of fellowship ; showed that the true society had for its chief, one altogether unlike the emperor; one whom he must crush, or to whom he must bow. And so, by slow degrees, the Roman state-idolatry, like the Greek idolatry of individual forms and persons, perished out of the World. IV. The Goths, again, heard the same proclamation of a kingdom of God. It did not find them watching the embers of an expiring civilisation, but full of boyish vigour and life and rudeness, eager to break and 224 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. subdue the earth; possessed by the wildest dreams of powers in earth and sea which wrestled for victory ; doing homage to a champion of a strong hand and seeing eye, the leader of their hosts and their prophet. With much joy, though amidst much confusion, these barbarians welcomed the tidings of a Redeemer in whom men could own at once their Lord and their brother. A redemption of man, a redemption of all that had been lost or disorderly in creation, was equally assumed in the preaching to Greeks, Romans, and Goths. It was set forth as an accomplished fact; as laying the only right and reasonable ground-work for human life ; as that of which the Church, by its very existence, bore testimony. And it was signified in the word Redemption, that the partakers of it were not brought into some novel or unnatural state, but into that for which they were created, that which was implied in their human constitution. V. If this was the nature of the Christian preaching and its success, we may understand where it was likely to encounter the greatest obstructions. The Persians believed in two rulers of the world, one good, one evil. The great reformer had indeed affirmed that the Lord of Light would prevail at last. He seems to have believed that the Prince of Darkness was a rebel against him; not originally a divider of his throne. But he never quite realised this conviction; he could not entirely deny the outward universe to LBCT. IV.] THE PERSIAN. 225 Ahriman; the Persians generally deemed him to be the creator of it. The two powers were regarded as having each a right over man, his flesh and his external circumstances being especially the property of the dark Spirit. What mighty evidences there seemed to be in favour of this hypothesis! How all history, from its beginning onwards, seemed to vouch for it ! What obstinacy in the old forms of evil ; what new floods of it were continually pouring in as from a perennial source ! In the third or fourth centuries, when the Eoman empire was tottering to its fall, under the weight of its own wickedness, the proofs of Ahriman's sovereignty were surely not less than they had been before. Had the Gospel of Christ permanently altered this state of things ? When the Persian conversed with Christians, he found them more ready than others to acknowledge an evil in themselves, more sensitive to its existence in the world. They even seemed to admit its supremacy, and to speak of the higher and purer state which they said Christ had established as a deliverance out of the natural human condition; of His saints as rebelling against the Prince of this World. Such language, often carelessly and ignorantly used, often misunderstood when it was rightly used, may at first have led the Magian to think that the Gospel bad not undermined his primitive doctrine — had rather brought new facts in confirmation of it. And yet he will have found Christians ready to live and die for the assertion that Christ was the one only Lord ; that 226 THE RELIGIONS OF THE "WORLD, [pabt ir. all things in heaven and earth and under the earth were subject to Him ; that no power of evil could measure itself against Him ; that He held an undoubted, undivided authority. The Persian will therefore have •felt that, in spite of seeming coincidences, this faith was one with which his could not consist ; that he was bound to exterminate the believers in Jesus, if he could not convert them. We have good evidence that no question was so profoundly agitating to men's minds in the first ages as this. The Magians, as I said, succeeded in re- establishing their old doctrine, and with it the old Persian empire. But the belief in rival powers of good and evil, to the latter of which the origin of all visible things might be ascribed, spread far beyond its limits. It incorporated itself with all the religious and philo- sophical views of the age; it penetrated deeply into the Church of Christ, was the great characteristic of its . most prevalent heresj', and mingled, in different forms and measures, with every other. Of all tests of the reality of Christian humility and faith, the greatest seems to have been the power of practically meeting this temptation, of resisting the conclusion that a perfectly good Being could not be the author and ruler of the universe ; that man could not really be a holy and redeemed creature; that the material world, at all events, must be given up as an evil thing. Only the simple, childlike trust which said, ' There are many things I cannot explain, but this I know, that the LECT. IV.] ST. AUGUSTINE. 227 Son of God has taken my nature, and made it holy, has walked this earth and made it holy, that He has adopted us into fellowship with Him, and commands us to look upon ourselves as holy, in spite of all the evil that is in usj and commands us to treat every creature as holy, though corruption and death may have set their mark upon it' — only a faith of this kind, surmounting present appearances, and laying hold of a higher truth, waiting calmly for them and it to be reconciled in God's good time, and meanwhile bracing the heart to those daily duties, which, on the other hypothesis, must have been thrown aside as useless and hopeless, could have hindered any Christian from becoming inwardly, if not professedly, a Manichean. St. Augustine has given us, in his own biography, a striking picture of this conflict. With a Christian mother and a heathen father, brought up in the feeble rhetoric of his titoe, but full of earnest thoughts which made him long to understand the nature of himself and of God; full also of violent passions seeking for gratification; he eagerly embraced the doctrine of the Manichean teachers, for it seemed at once to explain the problem of the universe, and to justify the in- dulgences which something within him condemned. He shows us how he was forced from speculations upon things without, to a more awful study of that which was passing in himself; how he learnt to perceive that the evil within him was the resistance of his will to a perfect and holy will; how this discovery did much 228 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii, more than scatter his old notions; how it led him to ask what that pure and holy Being had been doing on behalf of our race ; whether He had offered men the means of knowing Him and being like Him. Then the meaning of Christ's coming dawned upon him ; he believed that the perfect and holy Being was mani- fested in Him; that in Him man might behold his own true and proper state, and rise to it; that in His strength we may cast off evil from us, as an enemy which has no proper right or dominion over us, or over any creature ; that man when he becomes the slave of outward things is evil, not because they are evil, but because he is created to be their inaster. These truths, which slowly worked themselves out in his mind amidst great discouragements and bitter sorrows, he was asserting under one aspect or another all his life through. Shadows of his old system no doubt often darkened his intellect; when he was tempted to make Christianity a system, they were sure to re-appear. But there were times in his life when he felt more clearly than almost any man ever did, that evil does not belong to the order of the universe, but is its disorder; that every creature seeking to dwell in selfish independence, of necessity embraces that disorder and becomes a part of it; that every creature entering into God's covenant and yielding itself to Him, becomes orderly, reasonable, blessed. But it required more than the teaching of any man, however wise, to check a belief which was so plausible LECT. IV.] MAHOMET'S "WITNESS FOE THE GOSPEL. 229 as this. Though only open heretics affirmed that the world was essentially an evil thing, and originated in an evil Being, from whom Christ came to deliver his disciples, though these statements were generally felt to he blasphemous, yet numbers acted as if they were true. Those who decided to live pure and holy lives, left the world that they might do so. The sphere of human action was regarded by saints as an ungodly one, and those who moved in it and ruled it showed by their lives that they adopted the opinion. There was no distinct, audible voice, declaring, "The kingdoms of this world are the kingdoms of our God and of His Christ." The belief silently gained ground, that there was no warrant for such an assertion ; that the redemp- tion which our Lord had wrought, whatever it might mean, did not mean this. VI. But soon a voice was heard, speaking these words in the ears both of Persians and Christians: "This earth is the possession of the One Lord, the God of Abraham; He claimed it as His when He called out Abraham, and promised that he and his seed should possess a portion of it. The earth is still His. Those who say He has an equal or rival are liars." This was Mahomet's language. His sword was ready to make it good. The Magian faith, the Persian empire, fell to pieces before it. Of all the Mahometan enterprises this was the most startling, and that by which its other triumphs may be best understood. We complain of Mahometanism for its hard outward 230 THE EELIGIONS OF THE "WOULD, [paht ii. character ; for the materialism of its acts and its rewards. But see how well suited it was on this very ground to meet precisely that evil tendency to which men's minds had yielded. The denial of God's dominion over the actual world; the notion, that though He might have a reign somewhere else, it was not here; this unbelief was destroying all ordinary morality, all simple trust in a Father, was introducing atheism, or else devil-worship, among those who pretended to worship the Holy God, and utterly to renounce His enemies. No mere spiritualism, if it had been ever so fine and true, could have broken this spell. Palpable proofs were wanted that the kingdoms of this very earth were subject to an Unseeu and Absolute Sovereign. And the Mahometan conquests, though so mighty a testimony against Christians, were not a testimony against the Gospel, but for it; a testimony to one necessary, forgotten portion of it; a proof that, if the Church of Christ forgets its own proper position, God can raise up the strangest instruments to do His work. I say one portion of the Gospel ; for you will remind me that if Mahometanism asserted half the doctrine of the text I quoted just now, " The kingdoms of this earth are God's ; " it denied the latter half of it, '' and His Christ's." But this remark requires to be ex- plained and qualified by two others. Mahometanism does, indeed, deny the fact on which our Gospel rests, that a man is verily and indeed one with the Lord of all ; how that denial has affected the whole system, LECT. IV.] ITS PRACTICAL EFFECT. 231 I have considered in a former Lecture. But if we remember what the doctrine was which Mahometanism subverted, we shall see that it involved a much more direct denial of Christ, of His rule over this universe, and of His relation to God. The disposition to look upon the world as the possession of an evil power, which belonged to the Persian, and to the Christian who had caught his temper, made it impossible even to think of it as connected with Christ. The idea of Christ as a deliverer of man from the power of his Creator, went far deeper than the denial of His essential oneness with the Creator. So far as Mahom- etanism helped to clear the air of these pollutions, it removed the greatest of all impediments to the recog- nition of that doctrine which it set at nought. But secondly, in order to understand the effect of a system, and the place it occupies in the scheme of Providence, we should think not only of itself, but also of that which has been called out in opposition to it. The formation of society in modern Europe stands in close relation to the history of Mahometanism. The Christian nations were brought to feel that they were connected with each other, and what connected them, by seeing such large portions of the world knit together in the acknowledgment of the Arabian prophet. Then was the feeling distinctly realised, that all government has a Divine basis, that kings must be anointed with oil in the name of Christ, that the different members of the community hold their possessions, offices, powers, 232 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WOULD, [part ii. ultimately of Him; that they depend in different gradations upon each other ; that fealty is due to that which is unseen, reverence to that which is weak. Thus, in short, those institutions, forms, habits of thought established themselves which characterise the middle ages; which may be mischievous when they exclude other principles, more clearly perceived in later times; which have become mixed with corruptions, counterfeits, tyrannies, and confounded with them ; but which are essential elements of our social existence at this day, and cannot perish until we perish. Now these embodied the other half of the great truth which St. John's words express : " The kingdoms of this world are the kingdoms of his Christ." Nor should it be forgotten, that while the Mahometan doctrine has been proved by the evidence of history to be maimed and self-destructive, so long as it stands alone, re- jecting the principle of European society ; that society was continually in danger of losing its own foundation and stability, and of becoming utterly idolatrous and depraved, through forgetfulness of the principle which the Mahometans put forth. The worship of the men who uttered, of the visible symbols which shadowed forth, divine truths, might have effaced those truths, but for the testimony which Islamism was permitted to bear on behalf of them. VII. But though the Gospel, as it was preached by the Apostles and others who followed them, involved the assertion that the earth was redeemed and claimed LECT. IV.] THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 233 as God's possession by Christ, I am far from affirming that this was its only or its most characteristic affirma- tion. The Old Testament was especially the witness for God's government of the earth. The New speaks of the hingdom of heaven. John the Baptist said the kingdom of heaven was at hand. Our Lord illustrated its principles in every discourse and every miracle; His Apostles invited men to enter into it; in their Epistles they unfolded its nature to those who had beKeved the message and sought the privilege. This kingdom they described as one of righteousness, peace, and joy ; the eye could not see it, but it was most real. It was a kingdom for the heart and spirit of man, for that which was most properly himself, for that in which dwell all his capacities of sorrow, of sympathy, of trust, of hope, of love. It was called the kingdom of God because communion with Him is the great blessedness of it. And it is the kingdom of God because men are brought into it that they may see themselves, their fellow-creatures, the whole universe, as He sees them ; not partially, or eacb in reference to a separate centre, as they naturally do. Into this kingdom, our Lord said, men were pressing. Experience of sorrow, a sense of weariness and dissatisfaction with all that was visible, the feeling of a good almost within reach and yet never quite attained; above all, the bitter consciousness of something wrong within, which needed to be purged away, of a hollow which needed to be filled up ; these were intimations to men of an unseen treasure which 234 THE RELIGIONS OP THE WORLD, [part ii. they were intended to possess, which only One mightier than they could enable them to possess. Such thoughts and longings would especially haunt the hearts of poor and suffering people ; they would be rarer in men who had outward ease and comfort. But our Lord spoke of a divine power which could awaken in all the desire and capacity for this good; of a birth from above by which their spirits might be made fit for the Kingdom of Heaven; of an inward eye which might be opened to behold it. The Apostles, when they baptised men in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, bade them understand that this power was given them, and that though their bodies dwelt in Corinth or Ephesus, their real home was with Him whom they could love but not see. These were the words which stirred the hearts of the early Christians and led them to that indifference for outward thing's, which afterwards blended so easily with the Persian notion that these things were to be despised or regarded as evil in themselves. But the truth was not the less mighty because it was capable of a grievous perversion. The belief in it was the strength in which the Christian confessor lived and died. The invisible world was his dwelling : each day he sought to become more familiar with it, to have eveiy thought and feeling brought into harmony with it; to show forth more of the temper and spirit of it, in his converse with his fellow-creatures. While, indeed, he kept his Lord's words and example in recollection, he could not scorn any earthly task, he LECT. IV.] IN WHAT SENSE OURS AN EVIL WORLD. 235 must look upon all the creatures of God as good ; while he remembered for -what end Christ had come upon earth, he must deem fellowship with men more blessed than separation from them. Still it was the first gift of his redemption, that he could rise out of this c^icle of things. And when he saw to what coldness and hardness of heart, to what gross superstitions, those yielded, whose thoughts and aspirations were bounded by what they could see and handle, he could understand in what sense St. Paul blessed God for having delivered the Galatians out of this present evil world. It was an evil world, because men made it so, by renouncing the privilege of men ; by living as if they had only senses and were not spiritual beings capable of spiritual enjoy- ments ; as if each could only realise the little portion of the goods of earth which he calls his property, and might not enter upon that inheritance of true blessed- ness which all may share together, as all may share the light of the sun together. If men could so pervert these truths as to forget that the outward world was redeemed to be a part of God's kingdom, and if their inward life suffered terribly from this forgetfulness, it became manifest in the course of ages that they could quite as easily lose sight of that which was specially and emphatically the Christian doctrine while they seemed to admit and prize its material results. Since the active energies of men's minds have been awakened, since we have felt that it is our vocation to subdue the earth, to trade, colonise, 236 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [pakt il. and conquer, this has become the characteristic tempt- ation of all Christian nations, perhaps I may say, especially the characteristic one of our own ; for it lies close to some of our highest virtues, to our business-like habits, our love of action, our impatience of what does not look real and practical. Englishmen in the last century seem for the most part to have persuaded themselves that man is not a mysterious being ; that the Gospel does not address him as such ; that its main use is to check disorders which the law cannot entirely repress, to make servants respectful to their masters, to keep the humble classes from interfering with the privileges of their superiors ; that the kingdom of heaven is a place where certain rewards are bestowed hereafter for decency of conduct here. Those who refused to act upon these maxims, and earnestly devoted themselves to a spiritual life, fancied, not unnaturally, that the desires of which they were conscious did not properly belong to human beings ; that all men ought to have them, but that in fact scarcely any had them; that the unseen world is for the select few, not for mankind. But to Englishmen in the eighteenth century, the continent of India revealed itself with its treasures and its wonders. Its material treasures might help to strengthen the worldly appetite which went in search of them; but its wonders, well considered, might surely have supplied the counteraction, might have proved that men everywhere need a kingdom of. heaven as LECT. IV.] HINDOOS PREACHING TO ENGLISHMEN. 237 well as a kingdom on earth. The Hindoo lives in a world of thought. He is certain that divine know- ledge, the knowledge of Brahm, is the highest end of life. He cannot be satisfied tiU he is united with the Divinity. The divine man, he says, must be a twice- born man, must be raised out of his natural condition, must not lose himself in communion with outward things. Indications of this faith are forced upon the observation of every Englishman in India; he may explain them as he will, but he cannot deny them. Do they not say to him, just perhaps when the associations of his childhood are about to be cast off altogether — 'What you used to hear from your nurse and your mother may after all mean something. You were told that you were a twice-born man, a member of Christ, a child of God, an inheritor of the kingdom of heaven. May there not be treasures nearer to you than these Indian treasures, treasures which are yours by the clearest title, and yet which you have never reduced into possession? If you could impart them to these subjects of ours, might you not do that for them which the best legislation cannot do ? Will you not at least ask whether the Hindoo is wrong in thinking that man is made for something else than to buy and sell, to eat, drink, and die ; and whether, if he is right, there is any escape from his restless self-torture, except in the calm faith that it is our Father's good pleasure to give us that kingdom which the idolater would at the price of any anguish wring from the objects of his worship ? ' 238 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. Here then is a voice coming from the most opposite quarter to that whence the other was brought to us — a voice of the most different kind. Yet it comes as a witness not against but for that which we have been taught to believe, a witness not for but against our indifference to it. So that these two voices compared together, may, I think, help to answer the question we have been examining, whether Christianity be not dependent for its evidence and its success upon the faith of those who promulgate it. There cannot be a truer assertion than that this is the criterion of a human system; there cannot be a more undoubted prophecy than that the Gospel, if it be a human system, must perish, as all systems are perishing. On the other hand, if it were anything more than this, we should expect that the weakness, heartlessness, cowardice, baseness, of its advocates would themselves be in some way converted into demonstrations of its truth; that when men were holding their peace respecting it, the stones would cry out. Have we not found this to be the fact ? You say that Islamism has not fallen before the Cross. No, but Islamism has become one of God's witnesses for the Cross when those who pretended to bear it had really changed it for another standard. You say that Hindooism stands undisturbed by the presence of a triumphant Christian nation. Yes, for Hindooism has been wanted to teach this nation what it is very nearly forgetting itself, very nearly forcing others to forget, that Christianity is not a dream or a lie, LECT. IV.] SECTARIAN MODE OP PREACHING. 239 . I believe these conclusions must be brought home, in some way or other, to the hearts as well of those who are earnest about heathen missions as of those who are indifferent to them. For what is it that palsies all efforts of this kind ; what is it that produces the con- trast which we have confessed between the teachers of our own and those of earlier days ? Is it not that we have more than half subscribed to the philosophical doctrine ; more than half acted as if we were engaged in propagating a system of our own? Has not the impression we have conveyed to the minds of Maho- metans and pagans been something of this kind: 'These Frenchmen, Dutchmen, Spaniards, or English- men, acknowledge a certain teacher, to whom they attach very high titles. They wish us to acknowledge their teacher instead of those whom we in Arabia, Persia, or Hindostan, have been accustomed to honour. In other words, they wish to make us Europeans, to bring us over to their modes and habits of thinking.' I know and thank God that other impressions than this have been made by the Christian missionaries of all ages and nations upon those among whom they have gone, I know that the hearts of many of them have been so possessed with the love of Him who died for them and for all mankind, that they could not speak of Him as if He was their teacher, the Head of their sect. By their language,- by their acts, by that higher, simpler teach- ing which the Bible supplies, they must have carried home to many a broken-hearted creature, crying for a 240 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. Comforter, the assurance that there is One who has taken the nature, not of Englishmen, Frenchmen, Spaniards, but of Man ; who has entered into man's misery and death ; has borne the sins of man ; has encountered all his enemies, and vanquished them. The history of Missions would be barren indeed if this were not the case. But the more we admit the worth of such testimonies — (how great it has been we shall not know till the great day of revelation) — the more convinced must we be that the old proclamation of a divine kingdom, the old Gospel that the Son of God the Deliverer of Man has appeared and will be shown hereafter to be the Lord of the universe, is the only effectual one; that this is as fresh to-day as it was eighteen hundred years ago, because it is a pro- clamation of that eternal Law of the universe, which wears not out, which grows not old ; is not, in any sense whatever, our scheme or theory of the universe, but is sent to confound, to break in pieces, our schemes and theories of the universe ; to show how feeble and con- temptible we and they are ; how little we or any human creatures want a theory ; what absolute need all crea- tures have of a Living God who will reveal to us Himself: what relation there is between us and Him; how He works in us to bring us to know His purposes, and to move in accordance with them. VIII. That last discovery is indeed one without which the words I have just been speaking would seem only words of discouragement. To look out upon the LECT. IV.] THE BUDDHIST GOSPEL. 241 world, and see a valley covered with the dry bones of different systems, to hear them clashing together as if they might be joined to each other, and then to be told, ' It is all in vain ; there is no voice which can bid the breath enter into these bones; perhaps it might have come from Christians, but it does not ; they too occupy part of this valley ; they have become dry bones, very dry indeed; clashing always, never uniting' — such an announcement as this, however softened by thoughts of the past or the future, must be a very mournful one. But that third great religion of the world comes to turn the current of these thoughts, to check this despond- ency. We are but ill provided with a theory, say the Buddhists; we have tried many, and little fruit has come of them. But this we are assured of: you Chris- tians may not have heard it, but there is a quickening, life-giving Spirit, which is meant for humanity ; which all may possess togetber; which alone can bring a universe out of chaos, unity out of division. Wonderful testimony to be borne from the ends of the earth, from such a medley of strange people, so different in their thoughts, so incoherent in their utterances ! Is not the report of it like the sound of that rushing mighty wind, which was heard on the day of Pentecost, not indeed itself the promised Power, but the type and herald of it? Does it not say that we too might have cloven tongues to declare, in different tones and measures, according to the different thoughts, habits, and apprehensions of men, the same wonderful works M. B. L. -I^ 242 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. of God, and that these tongues might be of fire if only the living inspiration were confessed and obeyed by us ? Does it not bid us remember that with. this Spirit of peace and love and a sound mind we have been sealed ; that the Name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost, which was to be the blessing, the per- manent blessing, of Pentecost, has been bestowed upon us; that we hold this Spirit; not as the Buddhists dream, by our own right, — to be therefore the witness of our independence, flowing from no source whence it may be replenished, — but as the very bond of our dependence and childhood, as the Spirit of adoption, whereby we are to cry, Abba, Father; as the power whereby we can ask and receive a new life day by day. If so, there is cause enough for humiliation in all of us, for despair in none. The broken limbs of the world may yet be united, if the broken limbs of the Church be united first. But are these the limbs of a great system, or of a living body? Holding the first opinion of herself, the Church has been either held artificially together, the children within her groaning under the bondage to which she has subjected them, those without hearing in her invitation a message not of deliverance but of heavier slavery; or else, these artificial joints and fastenings being removed, she has split into fragments, upon which those who are clinging to them feel they can less and less depend, which offer to heathens an excuse for adhering to the tradition of their fathers, be it ever so dreary, till we who bid them LECT. IV.] THE POWER OF THE SPIRIT. 243 leave it are agreed what they should adopt in its place. But if the Scripture language is true, if the Church is a body constituted in a Head, the Buddhist proclama- tion carries with it the reproof and consolation which we require. There is a Power which can bring us not into some imaginary condition of excellence, but pre- cisely into our true condition : which can remove the individual interests, selfish feelings, national antipathies narrow apprehensions, that all our efforts to produce unity have only evoked and strengthened ; which can bring down our high notions and conceits of what we are and what we do ; which can enable us to be God's servants and to do His work in the world He has redeemed. Having confessed our rebellion against this Spirit, and sought the renewal of it in us and in the whole Church, we shall no longer say, as we have been tempted to say, ' The power of evil is supreme over the universe; only there has been a special deliverance vouchsafed to us;' we shall, from our hearts, abjure such blasphemous Manicheism ; we shall say boldly to all people among whom we go, ' The devil is not your master, he has no right to your worship : the God, in whom is light and no darkness at all, has claimed you and the whole creation for his own. His marvellous light is as much for you as for us. We only enjoy it upon the condition of renouncing all exclusive claim to it, upon the condition of bidding you enter into it.' IX. Buddhism, then, like Hindooism and Mahomet- anism, has its lesson for us. We are debtors to all these 244 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part ii. in a double sense. Nor, I think, is it otherwise with those modern infidels whose objections I have been considering throughout this course. Our obligations to them are not slight if they have been sent to break dwn a low grovelling notion we had formed of our own position and 'work; if they have been employed to convince us that human systems must indeed perish, one and all, that what survives must be something of a much higher derivation, of a more permanent character. We owe them the deepest gratitude if they have led us to ask ourselves whether there is any faith, and what kind of faith it is, which musb belong, not to races or nations, but to mankind ; still more, if they have forced us to the conclusion, that the real test, whether there be such a faith, and whether it has been made known to us, must be action, not argument ; that if it exist, it must show that it exists ; that if it have power, it must put forth its power. So, in this nineteenth century, the opponents of Christianity will return to the maxim which the wisest of them announced in the first : " If this be of men, it will come to nought ; if it be of God, we cannot overthrow it." I have been anxious in these Lectures to show that I did regard this practical experiment of our faith as the really decisive one. In compliance with the directions of Boyle, I sought for that which seemed to be the most prevailing form of unbelief in our day ; and I found it in the tendency to look upon all theology as having its origin in the spiritual nature and faculties of man. This LBCT. IV.] THE TRUE TEST OF CHEI8TIANITY. 245 was assumed to be the explanation of other systems, why not apply it to Christianity? The questions we have asked are, ' Is it the adequate explanation of any system ? Do not all demand another ground than the human one ? Is not Christianity the consistent assertor of that higher ground ? Does it not distinctly and con- sistently refer every human feeling and consciousness to that ground ? Is it not for this reason able to interpret and reconcile the other religions of the earth ? Does it not in this way prove itself to be not a human system, but the Revelation, which human beings require ? ' ' Prove ! ' you cry : ' Yes, on paper ! It is easy to prove many things about human creatures 'when you are not actually dealing with them.' Assuredly, most easy. It was of this that the other clauses of Boyle's will warned me. They said very significantly, 'Your business is to urge upon your countrymen the duty of not proving Christianity upon paper; but of entering into actual intercourse with Jews, Mussulmans, Hindoos, Buddhists, for the purpose of showing that it is a reality.' Accordingly, I have never lost sight of this object. My questions have been, ' How may we bring Christianity into contact with the actual convictions of these different people ? How may we put it upon the broadest trial? Where have other instruments and appliances failed? for that is the point on which we would make this bear. Where may it most clearly prove its inefficiency, if it be inefficient ? ' In no case have I wished to disguise any apparent symptoms of 246 THE EELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. [part ii. its failure. I have entreated Christians and infidels to investigate these symptoms, that they may ascertain the causes of them. And lest you should fancy, from the view I took of these systems, that I was recom- mending some new method of dealing with them, which could only be learnt and applied after a long discipline, and at last could scarcely be followed by simple ministers of the Gospel, I have endeavoured to show you in this Lecture, that precisely the course I have suggested is that which the preachers of the Gospel in the first ages actually adopted, that our departures from it have arisen from want of simple faith; that the discipline we require is especially one to restore this faith. And lest, from what has been just said about the unity of Christians, you should conclude that I suppose missions to the heathen should be deferred till some indefinite time when the nations of Christendom can make a simultaneous assault upon the outlying world, I would remind you that my refer- ence to the first ages, and to the successful missionary efforts of every subsequent age, precludes such a notion. What nation of the earth owes its Church to a simul- taneous effort among nations or among men ? If any one nation takes its stand upon its true ground as a member of that body whereof Christ is the Head, that nation becomes a witness to all Christian nations of their true unity, if they care ever so little for it ; that nation can fulfil its own task of vindicating the truths which its heathen subjects confess, by imparting to LBCT. IV.] MISSIONS TO THE HEATHEN. 247 them the truths which they want, though all the other Christian nations should smile or frown upon its endeavours. Any Christian man who takes his stand upon the same ground of unity in the Church whereof Christ is the Head, who acts consistently with that position, fulfilling the office to which he is called, and not seeking some other to please himself, may become a witness in every land to which he goes of the fellowship into which his baptism has brought him ; may in his words or life expound the principle of this fellowship ; may show how universal its privileges are, and how each may for himself partake of them. But I know that there must be many on whom the often-repeated words, ' There are heathens at our doors, we ourselves are half heathens; leave Buddhists and Mahometans till you have provided for these,' will have an effect sufficient to destroy their interest in all such exhortations. One answer to these objections is well known, and has been sufficiently used. If English- men did abstain rigidly from all intercourse with Mahometans, Hindoos, Buddhists, if no body of our countrymen were engaged in trading with other countries, or in conquering them, or in keeping possession of them, the interdiction of all spiritual communication might be judicious — at all events possible. But as the points at issue are, what hind of communication shall we hold with these people, what kind of help or protection shall we extend to them : if they are spiritual creatures, and as such must in some way be dealt with, then how ?— 248 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WOELD. [part ii. since this, I say, is the fair statement of the case, such appeals to our home sympathies seem rather capricious and rhetorical than b.enevolent or sensible. But this is not the only reply which is suggested by our particular circumstances, or which lies in the nature of the subject itself. A faith which boasts to be for humanity cannot test its strength unless it is content to deal with men in all possible conditions. If it limits itself to England, it will adapt itself to the habits and fashions and preju- dices of England, of England too in a particular age. But doing this, it will never reach the hearts of English- men. You say, ' Try your Christianity upon the cotton- spinners of Manchester, upon the hardware men of Birmingham; if it fails with them, do you expect it will succeed in Persia and Thibet ? ' We know it will fail, it must fail in Birmingham and Manchester, if it addresses the people in those places mainly as spinners and workers in hardware. This has been the mistake we have continually made. We have looked upon these ' hands ' as created to work for us ; we have asked for a religion which should keep the ' hands ' in the state in which they will do most work and give the least trouble. But it is found that they are men who use these hands ; and that which is a religion for hands, is not one for men. Therefore it becomes more evident every day that there is a demand in Manchester and Birmingham for that which, till we understand human beings better, we cannot supply. To acquire that understanding we need not grudge a journey to Persia LBCT. IV.] A RELIGION FOR MEN. 249 or Thibet ; we need not think it an idle task to inquire what people want, who are not called to spin cotton or work in hardware, but who are creatures of the same kind with those who do. When thoughtful men say that a working age of the world is about to begin, they mean, I suppose, an age in which those essential quali- ties of humanity which belong to working men as much as to all others shall be more prized than the accidents by which one class is separated from another. Most important is it then to ascertain whether we are holding a faith which addresses us as members of a class, a class of fine gentlemen, philosophers, divines, or one which, addresses us as men, which explains the problems of our human life. Two centuries ago Boyle was led in deep anguish of spirit to consider that question for himself; for himself, and not I think without something of the like anguish, must each one of us consider it in this day. We are told that circumstances have changed, that our condition is a different one from his. Doubtless, the saying is true ; circumstances are always changing ; but the necessities of man's being do not change. What was true of man generations ago, is true now. If our condition is different from that of our forefathers, the difference is this : we are come nearer to the great crisis of all controversies, there is less power of hiding our- selves from realities amidst shadows and appearances. Thanks be to God that such a time has come, terrible as it may be to many, nay to all of us ! For this is the time which will show that His truth is hot of maa. 250 THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD, [part n. neither by man ; but that it is for men, here and every- where. Only then when the grass withereth, and the flower fadeth, — so speaks individual experience, so speaks the voice of history, — is it known assuredly that the Word of our God shall stand for ever. THE END. Richard Ctay ami iions, London and Bungay. THE LIFE OF FREDERICK DENISON MATTRICE, CHIEFLY TOLD IN HIS OWN LETTERS. EDITED BY HIS SON, FEBDEEICK MAUEICB. WithTiuo Portraits. FourthThousand: Popular Edition. Tu/o Vols. Crown Soo. 16s. " The book is one of profound interest, and, both from the fresh light which it throws upon certain aspects of the religious history of England, and from the fresh means which it affords us of understanding a singu- larly beautiful character, it is cordially to he welcomed. ... It is im- possible to rise from the reading of these volumes without a feeling of increased respect and indeed of reverence for their subject." — The Times. " The book is a unique piece of biography. . . . This deeply interesting book." — Spectator. "A very memorable and touching story is told in these pages. . . . None who ever saw that wistful face and heard that real voice in the chapel of Lincoln's Inn, twenty-five years ago, will ever lose the charm of a personality which is a beautiful vision for evermore." — Chrislian World. FEEDEEICK DENISON MAUEICE, M.A. The Spectator says : — " Few of those of our ovm generation whose nantes mil live in English history or literaiwre have exerted so profound and so permanent an influence as Mr. Maurice." Moral and Metaphysical Philosophy. Vol. I. Ancient Philosophy and the First to the Thirteenth Centuries. Vol. II. Fourteenth Century and the French Eevolution, with a Glimpse into the Nineteenth Century. 3rd Edition. 2 Vols. 8vo. 16s. The Unity of the New Testament. A Synopsis of the First Three Gospels, and of the Epistles of St. James, St. Jude, St. Peter, and St. Paul. 2nd Ed. 2 vols. Cr. 8vo. 12s. The Kingdom of Christ ; or, Hints to a Quaker respecting the Principles, Constitution, and Ordinances of the Catholic CMi/rch. Third Edition. 2 vols. Crown 8vo. 12s. The Gospel of St. John. A Series of Discourses. Sixth and Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. The Epistles of St. John. A Series of Lectures on Christian Ethics. Second and Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. Lectures on the Apocalypse ; or, Booh of the Revelation of St. John the Divine. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. Lectures on Ecclesiastical History. 8vo. 10s. Qd. Theological Essays. Fourth Edition, with new Preface. Crown 8vo. 6s. Social Morality. Twenty-one Lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge. 2nd and Cheaper Ed. Cr. 8vo. 6s. Works hy the late Frederick Denison Maurice, If. A. The Prophets and Kings of the Old Testament. New Edition. This volume contains Discourses on Samuel I. and II. ; Kings I. and II. ; Amos, Joel, Hosea, Isaiah, Micah, Habakkuk, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel. Crown 8vo. 6s. The Gospel of the Kingdom of Heaven. A Series of Lectures on the Gospel of St. Luke. New Ed. O. 8vo. 6s. The Doctrine of Sacrifice deduced from the Scriptures. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. Expository Sermons on the Prayer-hook, considered especially in reference to the Romish System; and on the Lord's Prayer. New Edition. Crown Svo. 6s. Sermons preached in Country Churches. Second Edition. Crown Svo. 6s. The Friendship of Books ; and other Zeetiires. Edited, with Preface, by Thomas Hughes, Author of " Tom Brown's School Days." Second Edition. Crown Svo. 4s. 6d. The Conscience. Lectures on Casuistry, delivered in the University of Cambridge. Second and Cheaper Edition. Crown Svo. 4s. 6d. Dialogues on Family Worship. Crown Svo. 4s. 6d. The Patriarchs and Lawgivers of the Old Testament. Fourth and Cheaper Edition. This volume contains Discourses on the Pentateuch, Joshua, Judges, and the beginning of the First Book of Samuel. Crown Svo. 4s. 6d On the Lord's Prayer. Fourth Edition. Fcap. Svo. 2s. 6d. On the Sahhath Day; the Character of the Warrior; and on the Interpretation of History, Fcap. Svo. 2s. 6d. Learning and Working. Six Lectures on the Founda- tion of Colleges for Working Men. Crown Svo. 4s. dd. Law's Remarks on the Fable of the Bees. With an Introduction by F. D. Maubicb, M.A. Fcap. Svo. 4s. 6d The Lord's Prayer, the Creed, and the Commandments. A Manual for Parents and Schoolmasters. To which is added the Order of the Scripture-;. ISmo. Is. The Communion Service from the Book of Common Prayer, with Select Readings from the Writings of the Rev. F. D. Maurice. Edited by the Right Rev. J. "W. Colbnso, D.D., Bishop of Natal. Sixth Edition. 16mo. 2s. 6i. MACMILLAN & CO., LONDON. January 1893 A Catalogue of Theological Works published by Macmillan &' Co. Bedford Street, Strand, London CONTENTS The Bible — History of the Bible Biblical History .... The Old Testament The New Testament History of the Christian Church The Church of England Devotional Books .... The Fathers Hymnology Sermons, Lectures, Addresses, and Theological Essays Januaiy 1893. MACMILLAN AND CO.'S THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE tTbe Bible HISTORY OF THE BIBLE THE ENGLISH BIBLE : An External and Critical History of the various English Translations oif Scripture. By Prof. John Eadie, 2 vols. Svo. 28s. THE BIBLE IN THE CHURCH. By Right Rev. Bishop West- COTT. loth Edition. i8mo. 4s. 6d. BIBLICAL HISTORY BIBLE LESSONS. By Rev. E. A. Abbott. Crown Svo. 4s. 6d. SIDE-LIGHTS UPON BIBLE HISTORY. By Mrs. Sydney Buxton. Illustrated. Crown Svo. 5s. STORIES FROM THE BIBLE. By Rev. A. J. Church. Illus- trated. Two Series. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d. each. BIBLE READINGS SELECTED FROM THE PENTATEUCH AND THE BOOK OF JOSHUA. By Rev. J. A. Cross. 2nd Edition. Globe Svo. 2s. 6d. CHILDREN'S TREASURY OF BIBLE STORIES. By Mrs. H. Gaskoin. iSmo. is. each. Part I. Old Testament ; II. New Testament ; III. Three Apostles. A CLASS-BOOK OF OLD TESTAMENT HISTORY. By Rev. Canon Maclear. With Four Maps. i8mo. 4s. 6d. A CLASS-BOOK OF NEW TESTAMENT HISTORY. Includ- ing the connection of the Old and New Testament. By the same. iSmo. 5s. 6d. A SHILLING BOOK OF OLD TESTAMENT HISTORY. By the same. iSrao. is. A SHILLING BOOK OF NEW TESTAMENT HISTORY. By the same. iSmo. is. THE OLD TESTAMENT SCRIPTURE READINGS FOR SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES. By C. M. YoNGE. Globe Svo. is. 6d. each ; also with comments, 3s. 6d. each. — First Series : Genesis to Deuteronomy. — Second Series : Joshua to Solomon. — Third Series: Kings and the Prophets. — Fourth Series : The Gospel Times.— Fifth Series ; Apostolic Times, 2 MACMILLAN AND CO.'S The Old Testament — continued. WARBURTONIAN LECTURES ON THE MINOR PROPHETS. By Rev. A. F. Kirkpatrick, B.D. Crown 8vo. [/« the Press. THE PATRIARCHS AND LAWGIVERS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. By Frederick Denison Maurice. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. THE PROPHETS AND KINGS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. By the same. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. THE CANON OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. An Essay on the Growth and Formation of the Hebrew Canon of Scripture. By Rev. Prof. H. E. Ryle. Crown Svo. 6s. THE EARLY NARRATIVES OF GENESIS. By Rev. Prof. H. E. Ryle. Cr. Svo. 3s. net. The Pentateuch — » AN HISTORICO-CRITICAL INQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN AND COMPOSITION OF THE HEXATEUCH (PENTA- TEUCH AND BOOK OF JOSHUA). By Prof. A. Kuenen. Translated by PHILIP H. Wicksteed, M.A. Svo. 14s. The Psalms — THE PSALMS CHRONOLOGICALLY ARRANGED. An Amended Version, with Historical Introductions and Explanatory Notes. By Four Friends. New Edition. Crown Svo. 5s. net. GOLDEN TREASURY PSALTER. The Student's Edition. Being an Edition with briefer Notes of "The Psalms Chrono- logically Arranged by Four Friends." iSmo. 3s. 6d. THE PSALMS. With Introductions and Critical Notes. By A. C. Jennings, M.A., and W. H. Lowe, M.A. In 2 vols. 2nd Edition. Crown Svo. los. 6d. each. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY AND USE OF THE PSALMS. By Rev. J. F. Thrupp. 2nd Edition. 2 vols. Svo. 21s. Isaiah — ISAIAH XL.— LXVI. With the Shorter Prophecies allied to it. By Matthew Arnold. With Notes. Crown Svo. ss. ISAIAH OF JERUSALEM. In the Authorised English Version, with Introduction, Corrections, and Notes. By the same. Cr. Svo. 4s. 6d. A BIBLE -READING FOR SCHOOLS. The Great Prophecy of Israel's Restoration (Isaiah xl.-lxvi.) Arranged and Edited for Young Learners. By the same. 4th Edition. iSmo. IS. COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF ISAIAH, Critical, Historical, and Prophetical ; including a Revised English Translation. By T. R. BiRKS. 2nd Edition. Svo. 12s. 6d. THE BOOK OF ISAIAH CHRONOLOGICALLY ARRANGED. By T. K. Cheyne. Crown Svo. 7s. 6d. Zechariah — THE HEBREW STUDENT'S COMMENTARY ON ZECH- ARIAH, Hebrew and LXX. By W. H. LowE, M.A, Svo, los. 6d, THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE 3 THE NEW TESTAMENT APOCRYPHAL GOSPEL OF PETER. The Greek Text of the Newly-Discovered Fragment. 8vo. Sewed, is. THE NEW TESTAMENT. Essay on the Right Estimation of MS. Evidence in the Text of the New Testament. By T. R. Birks. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. THE SOTERIOLOGY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. By W. P. Du BOSE, M.A. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. THE MESSAGES OF THE BOOKS. Being Discourses and Notes on the Books of the New Testament. By Ven. Archdeacon Farrar. 8vo. 14s. THE CLASSICAL ELEMENT IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. Considered as a Proof of its Genuineness, with an Appendix on the Oldest Authorities used in the Formation of the Canon, By C. H. HooLE. 8vo. los. 6d. ON A FRESH REVISION OF THE ENGLISH NEW TESTA- MENT. With an Appendix on the last Petition of the Lord's Prayer. By Bishop Lightfoot. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. DISSERTATIONS ON THE APOSTOLIC AGE. By Bishop Lightfoot. 8vo. 14s. THE UNITY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. By F. D. Maurice. 2nd Edition. 2 vols. Crown 8vo. 12s. A COMPANION TO THE GREEK TESTAMENT AND THE ENGLISH VERSION. By Philip Schaff, D.D. Cr. 8vo. 12s. A GENERAL SURVEY OF THE HISTORY OF THE CANON OF THE NEW TESTAMENT DURING THE FIRST FOUR CENTURIES. By Right Rev. Bishop Westcott. 6th Edition. Crown 8vo. I OS. fid. THE NEW TESTAMENT IN THE ORIGINAL GREEK. The Text revised by Bishop Westcott, D.D., and Prof. F. J. A. HoRT, D.D. 2 vols. Crown 8vo. los. fid. each. — Vol. I. Text ; II. Introduction and Appendix. THE NEW TESTAMENT IN THE ORIGINAL GREEK, for Schools. The Text revised by Bishop Westcott, D.D., and F. J. A. Hort, D.D. i2mo, cloth, 4s. fid. ; i8mo, roan, red edges, 5s. fid. ; morocco, gilt edges, 6s. fid. THE GOSPELS— THE COMMON TRADITION OF THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS, in the Text of the Revised Version. By Rev. E. A. Abbott and W. G. RusHBROOKE. Crown 8vo. 3s. fid. SYNOPTICON : An Exposition of the Common Matter of the Synop- tic Gospels. By W. G. Rushbrooke. Printed in Colours. In Six Parts, and Appendix. 4to.— Part I. 3s. fid. Parts II. and III. 7s. Parts IV. V. and VI. with Indices, los. fid. Appendices, los. fid. Complete in i vol., 35s. Indispensable to a Theological Student. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE FOUR GOSPELS. Bv Right Rev. Bishop Westcott. 7th Ed. Cr. 8vo. los. fid. THE COMPOSITION OF THE FOUR GOSPELS. By Rev. Arthur Wright. Crown 8vo. 5s. 4 MACMILLAN AND CO.'S Gospel of St. Matthew — THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MATTHEW. Greek Text as Revised by Bishop Westcott and Dr. HoRT. With Intro- duction and Notes by Rev. A. Sloman, M. A. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. CHOICE NOTES ON ST. MATTHEW, drawn from Old and New Sources. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. (St. Matthew and St. Mark in i vol. gs.) Gospel of St. Mark— SCHOOL READINGS IN THE GREEK TESTAMENT. Being the Outlines of the Life of our Lord as given by St. Mark, with additions from the Text of the other Evangelists. Edited, with Notes and Vocabulary, by Rev. A. Calvert, M. A. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. CHOICE NOTES ON ST. MARK, drawn from Old and New Sources. Cr. 8vo. 4s. 6d. (St. Matthew and St. Mark in i vol. 9s.) Gospel of St. Luke — THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. LUKE. The Greek Text as Revised by Bishop Westcott and Dr. HoRT. With Introduction and Notes by Rev. J. Bond, M. A. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. CHOICE NOTES ON ST. LUKE, drawn from Old and New Sources. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. . THE GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. A Course of Lectures on the Gospel of St. Luke. By F. D. Maurice. 3rd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. Gospel of St. Jolin — THE CENTRAL TEACHING OF CHRIST. Being a Study and Exposition of St. John, Chapters XIIL to XVII. By Rev. Canon Bernard, M.A. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. THE GOSPEL OF ST. JOHN. By F. D. Maurice. 8th Ed. Cr. 8 vo. 6s. CHOICE NOTES ON ST. JOHN, drawn from Old and New Sources. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. THE ACTS OP THE APOSTLES— THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. Being the Greek Text as Revised by Bishop Westcott and Dr. Hort. With Explanatory Notes by T. E. Page, M.A. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. THE CHURCH OF THE FIRST DAYS. The Church of Jerusalem. The Church of the Gentiles. The Church OF THE World. Lectures on the Acts of the Apostles. By Very Rev. C. J. Vaughan. Crown 8vo. los. 6d. THE EPISTLES of St. Paul— ST. PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. The Greek Text, with English Notes. By Very Rev. C. J. Vaughan. 7th Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. A COMMENTARY ON ST. PAUL'S TWO EPISTLES TO THE CORINTHIANS. Greek Text, with Commentary. By Rev. W. Kay. 8vo. qs. THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE 5 Of St. Paul — continued. ST. PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS. A Revised Text, with Introduction, Notes, and Dissertations. By Bishop LiGHTFOOT. loth Edition. 8vo. 12s. ST. PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS. A Revised Text, with Introduction, Notes, and Dissertations. By the same. 9th Edition. 8vo. 12s. ST. PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS. With transla- tion, Paraphrase, and Notes for English Readers. By Very Rev. C. J. Vaughan. Crown 8vo. Ss. ST. PAUL'S EPISTLES TO THE COLOSSIANS AND TO PHILEMON. A Revised Text, with Introductions, etc. By Bishop LiGHTFOOT. gth Edition. 8vo. 12s. THE EPISTLES OF ST. PAUL TO THE EPHESIANS, THE COLOSSIANS, AND PHILEMON. With Introductions and Notes. By Rev. J. Ll. Davies. 2nd Edition. 8vo. 7s. 6d. THE EPISTLES OF ST. PAUL. For English Readers. Part I. con- taining the First Epistle to the Thessalonians. By Very Rev. C, J. Vaughan. 2nd Edition. 8vo. Sewed, is. 6d. ST. PAUL'S EPISTLES TO THE THESSALONIANS, COMMENTARY ON THE GREEK TEXT. By Prof. John EaDIE. 8v0. I2S. The Epistle of St. James — THE EPISTLE OF ST. JAMES. The Greek Text, with Intro- duction and Notes. By Rev. Joseph Mayor, M.A. 8vo. 14s. The Epistles of St. John — THE EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN. By F. D. Maurice. 4th Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. THE EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN. The Greek Text, with Notes. By Right Rev. Bishop Westcott. 3rd Edition. 8vo. 12s. 6d. The Epistle to the Hebrews — • THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS IN GREEK AND ENGLISH. With Notes. By Rev. Frederic Rendall. Crown 8vo. 6s. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. English Text, with Com- mentary. By the same. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. With Notes. By Very Rev. C. J. VAUGHAN. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. The Greek Text, with Notes and Essays. By Right Rev. Bishop Westcott. 8vo. 14s. KEVELATION— LECTURES ON THE APOCALYPSE. By F. D. Maurice. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. LECTURES ON THE APOCALYPSE. By Rev. Prof. W. MiLLiGAN. Crown 8vo. 5s. THE REVELATION OF ST. JOHN. By Rev. Prof. W. Milli- GAN. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. 6 MACMILLAN AND CO.'S 'R'ESrELA'nOTS— -continued. LECTURES ON THE REVELATION OF ST. JOHN. By Very Rev. C. J. Vaughan. sth Edition. Crown 8vo. los. 6d. THE BIBLE WORD-BOOK. By W. Aldis Wright. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. (tbristian Cburcb, Ibistori? of tbe Church (Dean).— THE OXFORD MOVEMENT. Twelve Years, 1833-45. Globe 8vo. 5s. Cuimmgham (Rev. John).— THE GROWTH OFTHE CHURCH IN ITS ORGANISATION AND INSTITUTIONS. 8vo. gs. Dale (A. W. W.)— THE SYNOD OF ELVIRA, AND CHRIS- TIAN LIFE IN THE FOURTH CENTURY. Cr. 8vo. los. 6d. Hardwick (Archdeacon).— A HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH. Middle Age. Ed. by Bishop Stubbs. Cr. 8yo. los. 6d. A HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH DURING THE REFORMATION. Revised by Bishop Stubbs. Cr. 8vo, los. 6d. Hort (Dr. F. J. A.)— TWO DISSERTATIONS. I. On MONOrBNHS GBOS in Scripture and Tradition. II. On the " Constantinopolitan " Creed and other Eastern Creeds of the Fourth Century. 8vo. 7s. 6d. KiUen (W. D.)— ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY OF IRE- LAND, FROM THE EARLIEST DATE TO THE PRESENT TIME. 2 vols. 8vo. 2SS. Simpson (W.)— AN EPITOME OF THE HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. Vaughan (Very Rev. C. J., Dean of Llandaflf).— THE CHURCH OF THE FIRST DAYS. The Church of jERtrsALEM, The Church of the Gentiles. The Church of the World. Crown 8vo. los. 6d. Ward (W.) — WILLIAM GEORGE WARJD AND THE OXFORD MOVEMENT. Portrait. 8vo. 14s. ZTbe Cburcb of Englanb Catechism of— A CLASS-BOOK OF THE CATECHISM OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND. By Rev. Canon Maclear. i8mo. is. 6d. A FIRST CLASS-BOOK OF THE CATECHISM OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND, with Scripture' Proofs for Junior Classes and Schools. By the same. i8mo. 6d. THE ORDER OF CONFIRMATION, with Prayers and Devo- tions. By the Rev. Canon Maclear. 32mo. 6d. THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE 7 Collects — COLLECTS OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND. With a Coloured Floral Design to each Collect. Crown 8vo. I2s. Disestablislmieiit — DISESTABLISHMENT AND DISENDOWMENT. What are they? By Prof. E. A. Freeman. 4th Edition. Crown 8vo. is. DISESTABLISHMENT : or, A Defence of the Principle of a National Church. By George Harwood. 8vo. 12s. A DEFENCE OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND AGAINST DISESTABLISHMENT. By Roundell, Earl of Selborne. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. ANCIENT FACTS & FICTIONS CONCERNING CHURCHES AND TITHES. By the same. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Dissent in its Relation to— DISSENT IN ITS RELATION TO THE CHURCH OF ENG- LAND. By Rev. G. H. Curteis. Bampton Lectures for 1871. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Holy Communion — THE COMMUNION SERVICE FROM THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER, with Select Readings from the Writings of the Rev. F. D. Maurice. Edited by Bishop Colenso. 6th Edition. i6mo. 2s. 6d. BEFORE THE TABLE : An Inquiry, Historical and Theological, into the Meaning of the Consecration Rubric in the Communion Service of the Church of England. By Very Rev. J. S. HowsON. 8vo. 7s. 6d. FIRST COMMUNION, with Prayers and Devotions for the newly Confirmed. By Rev. Canon Maclear. 3zmo. 6d. A MANUAL OF INSTRUCTION FOR CONFIRMATION AND FIRST COMMUNION, with Prayers and Devotions. By the same. 32mo. 2s. Liturgy — A COMPANION TO THE LECTIONARY. By Rev. W. Bbnham, B.D. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CREEDS. By Rev. Canon Maclear. i8mo. 3s. 6d. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE THIRTY- NINE ARTICLES. By the same. iSmo. [/« the Press. A HISTORY OF THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER. By Rev. F. Procter. i8th Edition. Crown 8vo. los. 6d. AN ELEMENTARY INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER. By Rev. F. Procter and Rev. Canon Maclear. i8mo. 2s. 6d. TWELVE DISCOURSES ON SUBJECTS CONNECTED WITH THE LITURGY AND WORSHIP OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND. By Veiy Rev. C. J. Vaughan. 4th Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. 8 MACMILLAN AND CO. S Devotional BooF^e Brooke (S. A.)— FORM OF MORNING AND EVENII«IG PRAYER, and for the Administration of the Lord's Supper, together with the Baptismal and Marriage Services, ' Bedford Chapel, Bloomsbury. Fcap. 8vo. Is. net. Bastlake (Lady).— FELLOWSHIP: LETTERS ADDRESSED TO MY SISTER-MOURNERS. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. IMITATIO CHRISTI, Libri IV. Printed in Borders after Holbein, Dvirer, and other old Masters, containing Dances of Death, Acts of Mercy, Emblems, etc. Crown Svo. 7s.' 6d. Kingsley (Charles). — OUT OF THE DEEP: WORDS FOR THE SORROWFUL. From the writings of Charles Kingsley. Extra fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. DAILY THOUGHTS. Selected from the Writings of Charles Kingsley. By his Wife. Crown 8vo. 6s. , FROM DEATH TO LIFE. Fragments! of Teaching to a Village Congregation. With Letters on the "Life after Death." Edited by his Wife. Fcap. Svo. 2s. 6d. Maclear (Rev. Canon).— A MANUAL OF INSTRUCTION FOR CONFIRMATION AND FIRST COMMUNION, WITH PRAYERS AND DEVOTIONS. 32mo. 2s. . , THE HOUR OF SORROW; OR, THE OFFICE FOR THE BURIAL OF THE DEAD. 32mo. 2s. Maurice (Frederick Denison). — LESSONS OF HOPE. Readings from the Works of F. D. Maurice. Selected by Rev. J. Ll. Davies, M.A. Crown Svo. 5s. RAYS OF SUNLIGHT FOR DARK DAYS. With a Preface by Very Rev. C. J. Vaughan, D.D. New Edition. iSmo. 3s. 6d. Service (Rev. John).— PRAYERS FOR PUBLIC WORSHIP. Crown Svo. 4s. 6d. THE WORSHIP OF GOD, AND FELLOWSHIP AMONG MEN. By Frederick Denison Maurice and others. Fcap. Svo. 3s. 6d. Welby- Gregory (The Hon. Lady).— LINKS AND CLUES. 2nd Edition. Crown Svo. 6s. • Westcott (Rt. Rev. B. F., Bishop of Durham). — THOUGHTS ON REVELATION AND LIFE. Selections from the Writings of Bishop Westcott. Edited by Rev. S. Phillips. Crown Svo. 6s. Wilbraliam (Frances M.)— IN THE SERE AND YELLOW LEAF: THOUGHTS AND RECOLLECTIONS FOR OLD AND YOUNG. Globe Svo. 3s. 6d. ^be ifatbers Cunningliam (Rev. W.)— THE EPISTLE OF ST. BARNABAS. A Dissertation, including a Discussion of its Date and Author- ship. Together with the Greek Text, the Latin Version, and a New English Translation and Commentary. Crown Svo. 7s. 6d. THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE 9 Donaldson (Prof. James).— THE APOSTOLICAL FATHERS. A Critical Account of their Genuine Writings, and of their Doctrines, and Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Lightfoot (Bishop).— THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS. Part I. St. Clement of Rome. Revised Texts, with Introductions, Notes, Dissertations, and Translations. 2 vols. 8vo. 32s. THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS. PartIL St. Ignatius to St. Poly- carp. Revised Texts, with Introductions, Notes, Dissertations, and Translations. 3 vols. 2nd Edition. Demy 8vo. 48s. THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS. Abridged Edition. With Short Introductions, Greek Text, and English Translation. 8vo. i6s. Brooke (S. A.)— CHRISTIAN HYMNS. Edited and arranged. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. net. This may also he kad bound up -with the Form of Service at Bedford Chapel^ Blooms- bury- Price complete^ 3J. net. Palgraye (Prof. F. T.)— ORIGINAL HYMNS. iSmo. is. 6d. Selbome (Roundell, Earl of) — THE BOOK OF PRAISE. From the best English Hymn Writers. i8mo. 2s. 6d. net. A HYMNAL. Chiefly from The Book of Praise. In various sizes. — A. Royal 32mo. 6d. — B. Small iSmo, larger type. is. — C. Same Edition, fine paper, is. 6d. — ^An Edition with Music, Selected, Harmonised, and Composed by John Hullah. Square i8mo. 3s. 6d. Woods (M. A.) — HYMNS FOR SCHOOL WORSHIP. Compiled by M. A. Woods. i8mo. is. 6d. Sermons, Xectures, Hbbresece, anb XTbcological leesai^s {See also 'Bible,' ' Church of England,' 'Fathers.') Abbot (Francis) — SCIENTIFIC THEISM. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. THE WAY OUT OF AGNOSTICISM : or, The Philosophy of Free Religion. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. Abbott (Rev. E. A.)— CAMBRIDGE SERMONS. 8vo. 6s. OXFORD SERMONS. 8vo. 7s. 6d. PHILOMYTHUS. An Antidote against Credulity. A discussion of Cardinal Newman's Essay on Ecclesiastical Miracles. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. NEWMANIANISM. A Reply. Crown 8vo. Sewed, is. net. Ainger(Rev. Alfred, CanonofBristol).— SERMONS PREACHED IN THE TEMPLE CHURCH. Extra fcap. 8vo. 6s. 10 MACMILLAN AND CO.'S Alexander i(W., Bishop of. Deny and Raphoe).^THE LEAD- ING IDEAS OF THE GOSPELS. New Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Crown 8vo. 6s. Baines (Rev., Edward).— SERMONS. With a Preface and Memoir, by A. Barry, D. D. , late Bishop of Sydney. Crown 8vo. 6s, Bather (Archdeacon).— ON SOME MINISTERIAL DUTIES, CATECHISING, PREACHING, etc. Edited, with a Preface, by Very Rev. C. J. Vaughan, D.D. Fcap. 8vo. 4s. 6d. Binnie (Rev. William). — SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. Birks (Thomas Rawson) — , THE DIFFICULTIES OF BELIEF IN CONNECTION WITH THE CREATION AIJD THE FALL, REDEMPTION, AND JUDGMENT. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 5s. JUSTIFICATION AND IMPUTED RIGHTEOUSNESS. Being a Review of Ten Sermons on the Nature and Effects of Faith, by James Thomas O'Brien, D.D., late Bishop of Ossory, Ferns, and Leighlin. Crown 8vo. 6s. SUPERNATURAL REVELATION: or. First Principles of Moral Theology. 8vo. 8s. Brooke (Rev. Stopford A.)— SHORT SERMONS. Cr. Svo. V6s. Brooks (Phillips, Bishop of Massachusetts)— THE CANDLE OF THE LORD, and other Sermons. Crown Svo. ■6s.' '■ ' SERMONS PREACHED IN ENGLISH CHURCHES. Crown 8vo. 6s. 'TWENTY SERMONS. Crown Svo. 6s. TOLERANCE. Crown Svo. '2s. 6d. THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d. Brunton (T. Lauder).^ THE BIBLE AND '"SCIENCE. With Illustrations. Crown Svo. ips. 6d. Butler (Rev. George).— SERMONS PREACHED IN CHEL- TENHAM COLLEGE CHAPEL. Svo. 7s. 6d. Butler (W. Archer) — SERMONS, DOCTRINAL AND PRACTICAL. nth Edition. Svo. 8s. SECOND SERIES OF SERMONS. Svo. 7s. Campbell (Dr. John M'Leod) — THE NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 6th Ed. Cr. Svo. 6s. REMINISCENCES AND REFLECTIONS. Edited with an Introductory Narrative, by his Son, Donald Campbell, M.A. Crown Svo. 7s. 6d. THOUGHTS ON REVELATION. 2nd Edition. Crown Svo. 55. RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE GIFT OF ETERNAL LIFE. Compiled from Sermons preached at Row, in the years 1829-31. Crown Svo. 5s. > THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE li Canterbury (Edward White, Archbishop of)— BOY-LIFE : its Trial, its Strength, its Fulness. Sundays in Wellington College, 1859-73. 4th Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. THE SEVEN GIFTS. Addressed to the Diocese of Canterbury in his Primary Visitation. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. CHRIST AND HIS TIMES. Addressed to the Diocese of Canter- bury in his Second Visitation. Crown 8vo. 6s. Carpenter (W. Boyd, Bishop of Ripen) — TRUTH IN TALE. Addresses, chiefly to Children. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. THE PERMANENT ELEMENTS OF RELIGION: Bampton Lectures, 1887. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. Oazenove (J. Gibson).— CONCERNING THE BEING AND ATTRIBUTES OF GOD. 8vo. 5s. Church (Dean) — HUMAN LIFE AND ITS CONDITIONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. THE GIFTS OF CIVILISATION, and other Sermons and Lectures. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. DISCIPLINE OF THE CHRISTIAN CHARACTER, and pther Sermons. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. ADVENT SERMONS. 1885. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. VILLAGE SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. CATHEDRAL AND UNIVERSITY SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. CLERGYMAN'S SELF-EXAMINATION CONCERNING THE APOSTLES' CREED. Extra fcap. 8vo. is. 6d. Congreve (Rev. John).— HIGH HOPES AND PLEADINGS FOR A REASONABLE FAITH, NOBLER THOUGHTS, LARGER CHARITY. Crown 8vo. 53. Cooke (Josiah P., Jun.)— RELIGION AND CHEMISTRY. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Cotton (Bishop).— SERMONS PREACHED TO ENGLISH CONGREGATIONS IN INDIA. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Cunninghani (Rev. W.) — CHRISTIAN CIVILISATION, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO INDIA. Cr. 8vo. 55. Curteis (Rev. G. H.)— THE SCIENTIFIC OBSTACLES TO CHRISTIAN BELIEF. The Boyle Lectures, 1884. Cr. 8vo. 6s. Davies (Rev. J. Llewelyn) — THE GOSPEL AND MODERN LIFE. 2nd Edition, to which is added Morality according to the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper. Extra fcap. 8vo. 6s. SOCIAL QUESTIONS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. WARNINGS AGAINST SUPERSTITION. Extra fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. THE CHRISTIAN CALLING. Extra fcap. 8vo. 6s. ORDER AND GROWTH AS INVOLVED IN THE SPIRITUAL CONSTITUTION OF HUMAN SOCIETY. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. 12 MACMILLAN AND CO.'S Davies (Rev. J. Llewelyn) — continued. BAPTISM, CONFIRMATION, AND THE LORD'S SUPPER, as interpreted by their Outward Signs. Three Addresses. New Edition. iSmo. is. Diggle (Rev. J. W.) — GODLINESS AND MANLINESS. A Miscellany of Brief Papers touching the Relation of Religion to Life. Crown 8vo. 6s. Drummond (Prof. James).— INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THEOLOGY. Crown 8vo. Ss. ECCE HOMO. A Survey of the Life and Work of Jesus Christ. 20th Edition. Globe 8vo. 6s. EUerton (Rev. John). — THE HOLIEST MANHOOD, AND ITS LESSONS FOR BUSY LIVES. Crown 8vo. 6s. FAITH AND CONDUCT : An Essay on Verifiable Religion. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Farrar (Yen. F. W., Archdeacon of Westminster) — THE HISTORY OF INTERPRETATION. Being the Bampton Lectures, 1885. 8vo. i6s. Collected Edition of the Sermons, etc. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. each. SEEKERS AFTER GOD. ETERNAL HOPE. Sermons Preached in Westminster Abbey. THE FALL OF MAN, and other Sermons. THE WITNESS OF HISTdRY TO CHRIST. Hulsean Lectures. THE SILENCE AND VOICES OF GOD. IN THE DAYS OF THY YOUTH. Sermons on Practical Subjects. SAINTLY WORKERS. Five Lenten Lectures. EPHPHATHA : or, The Amelioration of the World. MERCY AND JUDGMENT. A few last words on Christian Eschat- ology. SERMONS AND ADDRESSES delivered in America. Fiske (John).— MAN'S DESTINY VIEWED IN THE LIGHT OF HIS ORIGIN. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. Forbes (Rev. Granville).— THE VOICE OF GOD IN THE PSALMS. Crown 8vo. 6s. 6d. Fowle (Rev. T. W.)— A NEW ANALOGY BETWEEN REVEALED RELIGION AND THE COURSE AND CON- STITUTION OF NATURE. Crown 8vo. 6s. Fraser (Bishop). — SERMONS. Edited by Rev. John W. Diggle. 2 vols. Crown 8vo. 6s. each, Hamilton (John) — ON TRUTH AND ERROR. Crown 8vo. 5s. ARTHUR'S SEAT- or, The Church of the Banned. Crown 8vo. 6s. ABOVE AND AROUND : Thoughts on God and Man. i2mo. 2s. 6d. Hardwick (Archdeacon). — CHRIST AND OTHER MAS- TERS. 6th Edition. Crown 8vo. los. 6d. THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE 13 Hare (Julius Charles) — THE MISSION OF THE COMFORTER. New Edition. Edited by Dean Plumptre. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. THE VICTORY OF FAITH. Edited by Dean Plumptre, with Introductory Notices by Prof. Maurice and Dean Stanley. Crown 8vo. 6s. 6d. Harper (Father Thomas, S.J.)— THE METAPHYSICS OF THE SCHOOL. In s vols. Vols. I. and II. 8vo. i8s. each. Vol. III. Part I. I2S. Harris (Rev. G. C.) — SERMONS. With a Memoir by Charlotte M. Yonge, and Portrait. Extra fcap. 8vo. 6s. Hutton (R. H.)— ESSAYS ON SOME OF THE MODERN GUIDES OF ENG- LISH THOUGHT IN MATTERS OF FAITH. GlobeSvo. 6s. THEOLOGICAL ESSAYS. Globe 8vo. 6s. niingworth (Rev. J. R.)— SERMONS PREACHED IN A COLLEGE CHAPEL. Crown 8vo. Js. UNIVERSITY AND CATHEDRAE SERMONS. Crown 8vo. [In the Press. Jacob (Rev. J. A.) — BUILDING IN SILENCE, and other Sermons. Extra fcap. 8vo. 6s. James (Rev. Herbert).— THE COUNTRY CLERGYMAN AND HIS WORK. Crown 8vo. 6s. Jeans (Rev. G. E.)— HAILEYBURY CHAPEL, and other Sermons. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. JeUett (Rev. Dr.)— THE ELDER SON, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo. 6s. THE EFFICACY OF PRAYER. 3rd Edition. Crown 8vo. Ss. KeUogg (Rev. S. H.)— THE LIGHT OF ASIA AND THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. THE GENESIS AND GROWTH OF RELIGION. Cr. 8vo. 6s. Kingsley (Charles) — VILLAGE AND TOWN AND COUNTRY SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. THE WATER OF LIFE, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. SERMONS ON NATIONAL SUBJECTS, AND THE KING OF THE EARTH. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. SERMONS FOR THE TIMES. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. GOOD NEWS OF GOD. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. THE GOSPEL OF THE PENTATEUCH, AND DAVID. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. DISCIPLINE, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. WESTMINSTER SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. ALL SAINTS' DAY, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. Kirkpatrick(Prof. A. F.)— THE DIVINE LIBRARY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. Its Origin, Preservation, Inspiration, and Permanent Value. Crown Svo. 3s. net. 14 MACMILLAN AND CO.'S Kirkpatrick (Prof. A. F.) — continued. THE DOCTRINE OF THE PROPHETS. Warburtonian Lectures 1886-1890. Crown 8vo. 6s. Kynaston (Rev. Herbert, D.D.)— SERMONS PREACHED IN THE COLLEGE CHAPEL, CHELTENHAM. Crown 8vo. 6s. Lightfoot (Bishop) — LEADERS IN THE NORTHERN CHURCH : Sermons Preached in the Diocese of Durham. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. ORDINATION ADDRESSES AND COUNSELS TO CLERGY. Crown 8vo. 6s. CAMBRIDGE SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. SERMONS PREACHED IN ST. PAUL'S CATHEDRAL. Crown 8vo. 6s. SERMONS PREACHED ON SPECIAL OCCASIONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. A CHARGE DELIVERED TO THE CLERGY OF THE DIOCESE OF DURHAM, 2Sth Nov. 1886. Demy 8vo. 2s. ESSAYS ON THE WORK ENTITLED "Supernatural Reli- gion." 8vo. los. 6d. DISSERTATIONS ON THE APOSTOLIC AGE. 8vo. 14s. BIBLICAL MISCELLANIES. 8vo. [/» the Press. Maclaren (Rev. Alexander) — SERMONS PREACHED AT MANCHESTER. nth Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 4s. 6d. A SECOND SERIES OF SERMONS. 7th Ed. Fcap. 8vo. 4s. 6d. A THIRD SERIES. 6th Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 4s. 6d. WEEK-DAY EVENING ADDRESSES. 4th Ed. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. THE SECRET OF POWER, AND OTHER SERMONS. Fcap. 8vo, 4s. 6d. Macmillan (Rev. Hugh) — BIBLE TEACHINGS IN NATURE. 15th Ed. Globe 8vo. 6s. THE TRUE VINE ; OR, THE ANALOGIES OF OUR LORD'S ALLEGORY. Sth Edition. Globe 8vo. 6s. THE MINISTRY OF NATURE. 8th Edition. Globe 8vo. 6s. THE SABBATH OF THE FIELDS. 6th Edition. Globe 8vo. 6s. THE MARRIAGE IN CANA. Globe 8vo. 6s. TWO WORLDS ARE OURS. 3rd Edition. Globe 8vo. 6s. THE OLIVE LEAF. Globe 8vo. 6s. THE GATE BEAUTIFUL AND OTHER BIBLE TEACHINGS FOR THE YOUNG. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. Mahaffy (Rev. Prof.)— THE DECAY OF MODERN PREACH- ING : AN ESSAY. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. Maturin (Rev. W^.)— THE BLESSEDNESS OF THE DEAD IN CHRIST. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Maurice (Frederick Denison) — THE KINGDOM OF CHRIST. 3rd Ed. 2 Vols. Cr. 8vd. 12s. EXPOSITORY SERMONS ON THE PRAYER-BOOK ; AND ON THE LORD'S PRAYER. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE IS Maurice (Frederick Denison) — continued. SERMONS PREACHED IN COUNTRY CHURCHES. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. THE CONSCIENCE. Lectures on Casuistry. 3rd Ed. Cr. 8vo. 4s. 6d. DIALOGUES ON FAMILY WORSHIP. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. THE DOCTRINE OF SACRIFICE DEDUCED FROM THE SCRIPTURES. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD. 6th Edition. Cr. 8vo. 4s. 6d. ON THE SABBATH DAY; THE CHARACTER OF THE WARRIOR; AND ON THE INTERPRETATION OF HISTORY. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. LEARNING AND WORKING. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. THE LORD'S PRAYER, THE CREED, AND THE COM- MANDMENTS. i8mo. IS. SERMONS PREACHED IN LINCOLN'S INN CHAPEL. In Six Volumes. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. each. Collected Works. Monthly Volumes from October 1892. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. each. CHRISTMAS DAY AND OTHER SERMONS. THEOLOGICAL ESSAYS. PROPHETS AND KINGS. PATRIARCHS AND LAWGIVERS. THE GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. GOSPEL OF ST. JOHN. EPISTLE OF ST. JOHN. LECTURES ON THE APOCALYPSE. FRIENDSHIP OF BOOKS. SOCIAL MORALITY. PRAYER BOOK AND LORD'S PRAYER. THE DOCTRINE OF SACRIFICE. MilUgan (Rev. Prof. W.)— THE RESURRECTION OF OUR LORD. Fourth Thousand. Crown 8vo. 5s. THE ASCENSION AND HEAVENLY PRIESTHOOD OF OUR LORD. Baird Lectures, i&i)i. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. lAoorllOUSe (J., Bishop of Manchester) — JACOB : Three Sermons. Extra fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. THE TEACHING OF CHRIST. Its Conditions, Secret, and Results. Crown 8vo. 3s. net. Mylne (L. G., Bishop of Bombay).— SERMONS PREACHED IN ST. THOMAS'S CATHEDRAL, BOMBAY. Crown 8vo. 6s. NATURAL RELIGION. By the author of " Ecce Homo." 3rd Edition. Globe 8vo. 6s. Pattison (Mark).— SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. PAUL OF TARSUS. 8vo. ids. 6d. PHILOCHRISTUS. Memoirs ofa Disciple of the Lord. 3rdEd. 8vo. 12s. i6 MACMILLAN AND CO.'S Plumptre (Dean). — MOVEMENTS IN RELIGIOUS THOUGHT. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. Potter (R.)— THE RELATION OF ETHICS TO RELIGION. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. REASONABLE FAITH : A Short Religious Essay for the Times. By " Three Friends. " Crown 8vo. is. Reichel (C. P., Bishop of Meath) — THE LORD'S PRAYER, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. CATHEDRAL AND UNIVERSITY SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. Rendall (Rev. F.)— THE THEOLOGY OF THE HEBREW CHRISTIANS. Crown 8vo. Ss. Keynolds (H. R.)— NOTES OF THE CHRISTIAN LIFE. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Robinson (Prebendary H. G.)— MAN IN THE IMAGE OF GOD, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Russell (Dean).— THE LIGHT THAT LIGHTETH EVERY MAN ! Sermons. With an introduction by Dean Plumptre, D.D. Crown 8vo. 6s. Salmon (Rev. Prof. George) — NON-MIRACULOUS CHRISTIANITY, and other Sermons. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. GNOSTICISM AND AGNOSTICISM, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Sandford (C. W., Bishop of Gibraltar). — COUNSEL TO ENGLISH CHURCHMEN ABROAD. Crown 8vo. 6s. SCOTCH SERMONS, 1880. By Principal Caird and others. 3rd Edition. 8vo. los. 6d. Service(Rev. John).— SERMONS. With Portrait. Crown Bvo. 6s. Shirley (W. N.) — ELIJAH : Four University Sermons. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. Smith (Rev. Travers).— MAN'S KNOWLEDGE OF MAN AND OF GOD. Crown 8vo. 6s. Smith (W. Saumarez).— THE BLOOD OF THE NEW COVENANT : A Theological Essay. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. Stanley (Dean) — THE NATIONAL THANKSGIVING. Sermons preached in Westminster Abbey. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. ADDRESSES AND SERMONS delivered during a visit to the United States and Canada in 1878. Crown 8vo. 6s. Stewart (Prof. Balfour) and Tait (Prof P. G.)— THE UNSEEN UNIVERSE; OR, PHYSICAL SPECULATIONS ON A FUTURE STATE. 15th Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. PARADOXICAL PHILOSOPHY: A Sequel to "The Unseen Universe." Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Stubbs (Rev. C. W.)— FOR CHRIST AND CITY. Sermons and Addresses. Crown 8vo. 6s. Theological catalogue 17 Tait (Archbishop) — THE PRESENT POSITION OF THE CHURCH OE ENGLAND. Being the Charge delivered at his Primary Visitation. 8vo. 3s. 6d. DUTIES OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND. Being seven Addresses deUvered at his Second Visitation. 8vo. 4s. 6d. THE CHURCH OF THE FUTURE. Charges delivered at his Third Quadrennial Visitation. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. Taylor (Isaac).— THE RESTORATION OF BELIEF. Crown 8vo. 8s. 6d. Temple (Frederick, Bishop of London) — SERMONS PREACHED IN THE CHAPEL OF RUGBY SCHOOL. SECOND SERIES. 3rd Edition. Extra fcap. 8vo. 6s. THIRD SERIES. 4th Edition. Extra fcap. 8vo. 6s. THE RELATIONS BETWEEN RELIGION AND SCIENCE. Bampton Lectures, 1884. 7th and Cheaper Ed. Cr. 8vo. 6s. Trencll(Archbishop).—HULSEAN LECTURES. 8vo. 7s. 6d. Tullocll (Principal).— THE CHRIST OF THE GOSPELS AND THE CHRIST OF MODERN CRITICISM. Extra fcap. 8vo. 4s. 6d. Vaughan (C. J., Dean of Llandaff) — MEMORIALS OF HARROW SUNDAYS. Sth Edition. Crown 8vo. los. 6d. EPIPHANY, LENT, AND EASTER. 3rd Ed. Cr. 8vo. los. 6d, HEROES OF FAITH. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. LIFE'S WORK AND GOD'S DISCIPLINE. 3rd Edition, Extra fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. THE WHOLESOME WORDS OF JESUS CHRIST. 2nd Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. FOES OF FAITH. 2nd Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. CHRIST SATISFYING THE INSTINCTS OF HUMANITY. 2nd Edition. Extra fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. COUNSELS FOR YOUNG STUDENTS. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. THE TWO GREAT TEMPTATIONS. 2nd Ed. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. ADDRESSES FOR YOUNG CLERGYMEN. Extra fcap. 8vo. 4s. 6d. " MY SON, GIVE ME THINE HEART." Extra fcap. 8vo. Js. REST AWHILE. Addresses to Toilers in the Ministry. Extra fcap. 8vo. 5s. TEMPLE SERMONS. Crown 8vo. los. 6d. AUTHORISED OR REVISED ? Sermons on some of the Texts in which the Revised Version differs from the Authorised. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. LESSONS OF THE CROSS AND PASSION. WORDS FROM THE CROSS. THE REIGN OF SIN. THE LORD'S PRAYER. Four Courses of Lent Lectures. Crown 8vo. los. 6d. UNIVERSITY SERMONS. NEW AND OLD. Cr. 8vo. los. 6d. i8 MACMILLAN AND CO.'S THEOLOGICAL CATALOGUE Vaughau (C. J., Dean of Llandafif) — continued. NOTES FOR LECTURES ON CONFIRMATION. Fcap. 8vo. IS. 6d. THE PRAYERS OF JESUS CHRIST : a closing volume of Lent Lectures delivered in the Temple Church. Globe 8vo. 3s. 6d. DONCASTER SERMONS. Lessons of Life and Godliness, and Words from the Gospels. Cr. 8vo. 10s. 6d. RESTFUL THOUGHTS IN RESTLESS TIMES. Crown 8vo. [/« the Press. Vaughan (Rev. D. J.)— THE PRESENT TRIAL OF FAITH. Crown 8vo. 9s. Vaughan (Rev. E. T.)— SOME REASONS OF OUR CHRIS- TIAN HOPE. Hulsean Lectures for 1875. Crown 8vo. 6s. 6d. Vaughan (Rev. Robert). — STONES FROM THE QUARRY. Sermons. Crown 8vo. 5s. Venn (Rev. John).— ON SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF BELIEF, SCIENTIFIC AND RELIGIOUS. 8vo. 6s. 6d. ■Warington(G.)—THEWEEK OF CREATION. Cr. 8vo. 4s. 6d. Welldon (Rev. J. E. C.)— THE SPIRITUAL LIFE, and other Sermons. Crown 8vo. 6s. Westcott (B. F., Bishop of Durham) — ON THE RELIGIOUS OFFICE OF THE UNIVERSITIES. Sermons. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. GIFTS J'OR MINISTRY. Addresses to Candidates for Ordination. Crown 8vo. is. 6d. THE VICTORY OF THE CROSS. Sermons preached during Holy Week, 1888, in Hereford Cathedral. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH. Three Sermons (In Memoriam J. B. D. ) Crown 8vo. 2s. THE REVELATION OF THE RISEN LORD. Cr. 8vo. 6s. THE HISTORIC FAITH. 3rd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. THE GOSPEL OF THE RESURRECTION. 6th Ed. Cr. 8vo. 6s. THE REVELATION OF THE FATHER. Crown 8vo. 6s. CHRISTUS CONSUMMATOR. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. SOME THOUGHTS FROM THE ORDINAL. Cr. 8vo. is. 6d. SOCIAL ASPECTS OF CHRISTIANITY. Crown 8vo. 6s. ESSAYS IN THE HISTORY OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT IN THE WEST. Globe 8vo. 6s. THE GOSPEL OF LIFE. Cr. 8vo. 6s. Wickham (Rev. E. C.)— WELLINGTON COLLEGE SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 6s. Wilkins (Prof. A. S.)— THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD : an Essay. 2nd Edition. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. Wilson (J. M., Archdeacon of Manchester) — SERMONS PREACHED IN CLIFTON COLLEGE CHAPEL. Second Series. i888-go. Crown 8vo. 6s. ESSAYS AND ADDRESSES. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. SOME CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE RELIGIOUS THOUGHT OF OUR TIME. Crown 8vo. 6s. Printed ^j/ R. & R. Clark, Edinbursh VI. 50. 1. 93