(Tornell XHnivetsit^ OF THE IRewl^orft State College of Hariculture /^■t?iil Aj..gnr|.i5. 8101 Cornell University Library HF5472.U7N5 1913 Report of the Mayor's Market commission 3 1924 013 823 723 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/cletails/cu31924013823723 REPORT OF THE MAYOR'S MARKET COMMISSION OF NEW YORK CITY Hon. Cyrus C. Miller, Chairman HoK. John Pdrroy Mitchel Hon. George McAneny DECEMBER, 1913 UlfVb' ^q.b5^t 889—14—2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF THE MAYOR'S MARKET COMMISSION OF NEW YORK CITY PAGE I. Letter of Transmittal S II. Objects and Work of the Commission 9 III. Summary of Market Conditions in New York City 10 IV. Present Methods of Marketing Farm Products 11 V. Prices 14 VI. Present Facilities for Distribution Within the City 16 VII. Present Public Markets 19 VIII. Proposed Market System for the City 22 IX. Recommendations 26 APPENDIX \ I. Existing Steamship and Railroad Terminals in the City of New York W. G. Rainsford 29 II. Financial Statement of the Public Markets of the City of New York Sidney A. Goodacre 42 III. Proposed Bronx Market — ^Description and Plans 49 IV. Brief and Plans for a New West Washington and Gansevoort Market 57 V. Public Markets in American Cities J. F. Carter 67 VI. Foreign Markets Mrs. Elmer Black 85 VII. Provisioning Metropolitan Populations with Fresh Foodstuffs, Including a History of the Market System of Berlin, by Edgar Lange, translated by J. M. Friedland 95 VIII. Transportation and Its Relation to Retail Prices Frank_ Andrews 119 IX. Waterways and Cost of Living S. A. Thompson 125 X. Trolley Freight Clyde L. King 129 XI. Refrigeration at the Market Center M. E. Pennington 135 XII. The Grading, Packing and Marketing of Farm Produce.. .L. J. Lippmann 139 XIII. A Study of Markets and the Marketing of Foodstuffs G. L. Bennett 147 XIV. Abstracts of Testimony Taken by the Commission 211 XV. Bibliography C. C. Williamson 265 XVI. Proposed Bill Creating Department of Markets 295 I. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. December 30, 1913. Hon. Ardolph R. Kline, Mayor of the City of New York. Sir: The Market Commission appointed by Mayor Gaynor on May 14, 1912, to investigate and report on the conditions under which foodstuflfs are marketed at present in the Boroughs of Manhattan and The Bronx, and to make recommendations for the bettering of those conditions, submits the acompanying report The inquiry was extended to the Boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, and Richmond, by invitation of the authorities of those Boroughs. After an extended investigation of market conditions in the City of New York through the conduct of public hearings, at which representatives of many classes of marketmen, railroad men and other experts have given testimony, and the study of monographs and reports from many sections of this country and many foreign cities, your Commission believes that the recommendations contained in its report suggest the means of effecting a substantial reduction to the consumers of this city in the cost of their food. How pressing the need for this is it is hardly necessary to state. Respectfully submitted, Cyrus C. Miller, President of the Borough of The Bronx, Chairman. George McAneny, President of the Borough of Manhattan. II. OBJECTS AND WORK OF THE COMMISSION What subsequently expanded into the work of the Market Commission had its origin in a conference held at Borough Hall, The Bronx, on November 9, 1910, be- tween the Borough President and a committee of the Manhattan and Bronx Retail Grocers' Association to discuss the question of establishing a public produce market in the Borough of The Bronx. A committee of citizens was appointed to select a site for such a market. At first the plan was to confine the movement to the Borough of The Bronx, where the poor marketing facilities were a burden on both dealers and consumers. On May 14, 1912, Mayor Gaynor appointed this Commission to examine into the- market conditions of The Bronx and Manhattan and to report such remedies as might be found advisable for present marketing conditions. He also appointed an Advisory Committee to cooperate with the Commission toward the same ends. The Commission consists of — Hon. Cyrus C. Miller, President of the Borough of The Bronx, Chairman. Hon. George McAneny, President of the Borough of Manhattan. Hon. John Purroy Mitchel, Ex-President of the Board of Aldermen. Elizabeth I. Toms, Secretary. The Advisory Committee consists of — John Aspegren, Vice-President, New York Produce Exchange. Mrs. Elmer Black. Edward B. Boynton, Bronx Industrial Bureau. Franklin Brooks, Attorney-at-Law. John Buckle, President, Gansevoort Market Business Men's Association. Henry Dunkak, Ex-President, New York Merckntile Exchange. Emil Fleischl, Produce Commission Merchant. Charles Haslop, member New York Retail Grocers' Association. Mrs. Julian Heath, President, National Housewives' League. Carl A. Koelsch, President, Washington Market Merchants' Association. Nelson P. Lewis, Chief Engineer, Board of Estimate and Apportionment. Richard W. Lawrence, North Side Board of Trade. L. J. Lippmann, Secretary, New York Branch National League of Commission Merchants. Mrs. George V. Mullan. Mrs. Lewis Nixon. William Church Osborn, Chairman, Committee on Markets, Prices, and Costs,. New York State Food Investigating Commission. George S. Otis, West Washington Market Association. William R. Patterson, Assistant Commissioner of Public Works, Borough of Manhattan. Joseph E. Smith, Produce Commission Merchant. R. A. C. Smith, Commissioner of Docks and Ferries. Mrs. Flora Spiegelberg, member Housewives' League. Since the appointment of the Commission and the Advisory Committee the work of examining into market conditions has gone on in various ways. The Gansevoort 10 Market Business Men's Association, the West Washington Market Association, the Chelsea Association of Merchants and Manufacturers, and the Greenwich Village Public Service Committee asked us especially to examine into conditions in and around Gansevoort and West Washington Markets, looking toward the construction of a new market in that vicinity when the present West Washington Market should be taken for dock purposes. They submitted to the Commission a brief and plan for a. new market building in the vicinity, which is printed in the Appendix to this report. The Greenpoint Taxpayers' and Citizens' Association requested us to ex- amine market conditions in the Greenpoint section to determine the advisability of locating a public market there in the neighborhood of the proposed Barge Terminal at Greenpoint. The authorities of the Boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, and Richmond requested us to examine conditions there and to make recommendations to remedy conditions. The Commission and Advisory Committee have held weekly hearings and have taken the testimony of wholesale and retail dealers, railroad men and others acquainted with the business of the markets. Synopses of the testimony taken will be found in the Appendix. The Commission has made few statistical studies, as the very ex- cellent estimates and statistics compiled by the Committee on Markets, Prices and Costs of the State Food Investigating Commission and others were available, and statistics are not necessary at this time to show either that prices are high or that the facilities for distribution in this city are inadequate. In the meantime, by means of speeches, newspaper and magazine articles, and the distribution of pamphlets, reprints and reports, the wpfk of educating the public on the market question has gone forward steadily. Much valuable aid has been given to the Commission by such men as Mr. L. J. Lippmann, Secretary of the New York Branch of the National League of Commission Merchants; Mr. John Buckle, Presi- dent of the Gansevoort Market Business Men's Association; Mr. George S. Otis, of the West Washington Market Association; and Mr. Carl A. Koelsch, President of the Washington Market Merchants' Association; and by such women as Mrs. Elmer Black, Mrs. Flora Spiegelberg, Mrs. Julian Heath, President of the National House- wives' League; Mrs. Bleecker Bangs, and Dr. Mary E. Pennington, Chief of the Food Research Laboratory of the United States Department of Agriculture. Mrs. Black accumulated a great deal of valuable data on a tour of markets in Europe which she laid before the Commission in her testimony and in a report which she printed and distributed at her own expense. The Commission has been fortunate in being able to secure several detailed studies of special features of modern marketing by persons having expert knowledge of the subjects treated. These will be found appended. III.* SUMMARY OF MARKET CONDITIONS IN NEW YORK CITY The marketing system of New York City may be briefly outlined and its greatest defects indicated as follows : (1) Food supplies are brought to the city for — 1. A resident population of 5,000,000. 2. A transient and commuting population numbering many thousands daily. 3. The provisioning of outgoing steamships and trains. 4. Export to other cities and towns. It is estimated that the value of the foodstuffs brought to New York City annually is $900,000,000. (2) Most of New York's food supplies are brought by railroad and steamship and come over great distances. 11 (3) The farming district around the city is not great enough or varied enough in its productivity or producing in long enough seasons to supply the needs of the city in any line. Suburban developments are all the time pushing the farm lands farther and farther away. It is impossible to alleviate conditions by establishing markets for producers to sell to consumers. (4) New York City has no modern wholesale market. Supplies are received at many points, chiefly at the lower end of Manhattan Island, are sold sometimes at the terminals and sometimes at the stores of the dealers, and thence must be trucked all over the city and out to suburban places. (5) The terminals in the city where food products are brought in are entirely those provided by the transportation lines and are not sufficient to handle the volume of business that passes through them, in the right way. There is a great deal of congestion of trucks and wagons, causing delay in moving the goods, and in- sufficient means of protecting the goods from the weather and from extremes of temperature. Proper inspection is difficult. (6) There is no supervision of marketing on the part of the city as there is in foreign cities and in some cities of our own country. IV. PRESENT METHODS OF MARKETING FARM CROPS A hundred years ago the parishable farm products used in the city all came from nearby farms — there were no means of bringing them over greater distances. When Washington Market was built in 1812 it was a place where the farmer brought his goods and sold them to the people. To-day conditions are more complex and the means of establishing a direct route between producer and consumer less obvious, but public interest in the matter and public provision of the right kind of market is not less important. To-day the development of railroad and steamship has brought the farms of South Carolina and Kansas as near New York City as were those of Long Island and Westchester County one hundred years ago. It has removed any limitations on the growth of the city imposed by the difficulty of getting an adequate food supply, and, as a consequence, the city has grown until it is dependent upon the production of a very wide area for its continued existence. The commonest articles of food are often brought great distances : potatoes, for instance, are brought to the New York market from Maine, from the Western States, from Bermuda, Scotland, Ireland, and Belgium; onions, from the South — Virginia, South Carolina, and Texas, from the Western States, and from Italy and Spain; green vegetables of all kinds are brought from nearby farms and in very large quantities from the South and Weston the flush season one railroad bringing over 300 car- loads a day, and one steamship line running two steamers daily in the busy season between New York and Virginia; oranges and grapefruit come from California and Florida, the West Indies and Mediterranean ports; apples, from New England and New York, the Middle West, Oregon and Washington; cauliflower comes in the early season from Cape May and later from Long Island; melons from California, Colorado and the South; bananas, from the West Indies and South America, and so on. Under these conditions it is impossible for marketing to be carried on to any great extent directly between producer and consumer. An army of middlemen are engaged in collecting, grading, shipping, and distributing the farm produce used in the city, and, though they have been accused of dishonest practices, and sometimes justly so, it is likely that a considerable evolution in marketing methods will have to take place 12 before their services can be dispensed with. They perform labor that individual con- sumers could not perform for themselves without expense far greater than the middlemen impose. That is not to say, however, that products do not often pass through too many hands and have too many increments added to their prices. It is the very fact that present conditions necessitate this that leads us to propose better marketing facilities for the city. The men who handle the farm products between the farm and the New York City consumer may be classified roughly as: (1) shippers, (2) commission merchants and wholesalers, (3) jobbers, (4) retailers. The ways in which goods are collected and shipped to market vary greatly. Many of the farmers nearby drive in themselves with their goods, and sell to jobbers and retailers in the few market squares provided by the city. Those who are too far away to do this may be in touch with some merchant in the city and ship to him, or they may sell to a collecting agent or to a country storekeeper who acts as a collecting agent and ships goods to merchants in the city. Many commission houses employ agents to go through the country districts and buy from the farms. The prices they give are apt to be low, but the farmer often prefers a cash sale at a low price to the risks of sending goods to a distant market on his own responsibility. Many commission houses also employ men in the country to grade, pack, and ship the goods thus collected from the farmers, as the farmers are often quite as unreliable in grading and packing their goods as the middlemen are reputed to be in selling them. Many farmers specialize in certain products so that they may ship in carload lots to commission merchants or wholesalers. Recent years have seen the formation of a great many cooperative associations of producers. Where the farmers of a district all raise more or less of the same products they unite in an association to take charge of the grading, packing, shipping, and marketing of their goods. They do not eliminate the middleman, but they eliminate his profits. They employ him and pay him a fixed salary for his service and return to their members any surplus that accrues over the expenses of the association. Such an association well managed is the best protection the farmer can have. By its size and importance it inspires respect, and, by establishing a uniform system of grad- ing and marking goods that is known and trusted, it protects its members from the worst enemy they have, the dishonest farmer, who, by fraudulent packing, destroys the confidence of buyers that goods will be as represented. Many of these associa- tions keep in constant touch with conditions in all the large markets of the country and, after shipments are on their way, divert them by telegraph at intermediate points from their original destinations to other cities where the markets promise better prices. The largest receivers in the city are the commission merchants or wholesalers who receive goods on consignment or sale and sell to jobbers and sometimes retailers. There are something over 500 men engaged in the commission business in this city. In general, they charge a commission of five per cent, on sales. All sorts of mal- practices have been attributed to them, such as reporting goods as received in bad condition when they really have arrived in good condition, holding back goods in the freight yards to keep prices high, reporting sales as made at the day's low figure when they were really made at a higher, charging higher rates for cartage to shippers than they paid the truckmen, etc. Enough of these things have been endured by the shippers to cast suspicion in their minds upon the whole group. The enactment of protective measures and greater publicity of market conditions should do much to remedy the situation. Such measures should be welcomed by those who are seeking to do an honest business, unless they throw an unfair burden on the trade. Advanced legislation has been enacted in this line in some of the Western States, notably Minnesota, and a beginning has been made in New York in the' bill passed 13 last year requiring the registration of all commission merchants and the giving of a bond of $3,000 to ensure fair dealing. This gives greater protection to shippers than they have had before, but it throws the burden entirely on the commission man, whereas the standards of honesty among shippers have not always been found to be above reproach. It would seem to be no more than fair to provide for a similar registration of shippers with the State or National Bureau of Agriculture, and the establishment of standard requirements for the grading of farm produce. Shippers could then be held accountable to such Department of Agriculture for false marking of goods, and, in time, the shipper's registry number or identification mark on a package would come to be recognized as a guarantee of quality. Such measures increase business confidence. It is impossible for the large wholesale dealers and commission men in the city to conduct their businesses on such a scale that they can divide up their goods into small enough lots to sell to the ordinary small retailers. For this reason an intermedi- ate group of middlemen has arisen, known in the New York market as jobbers, who perform the next step in the dividing and distributing process. Goods sometimes pass through the hands of three or four such dealers before reaching the retailer. They sell to hotels and to fruit and vegetable dealers in the outlying districts who cannot take the time necessary to buy in the primary markets, to go from place to place and select just the right grade of goods for their trade, and many of whom cannot take goods in large enough lots to buy as the commission dealers must sell. Some deliver at their stores to the retailers' wagons, some make deliveries by their own or hired trucks, and others drive around from store to store and sell to grocers and vegetable men. The Harlem Market in Manhattan contains, in addition to the farmers' market, a jobbers' market, and is the base of supplies for many dealers in upper Manhattan and The Bronx, as it is the nearest market where they find any considerable variety. There are also some jobbers and some direct receivers in The Bronx. In Wallabout Market, where most of the Brooklyn merchants get their sup- plies of perishable goods, the dealers are jobbers for the most part, who buy from the large receivers in Manhattan — in some cases Long Island produce that has been taken into Manhattan for its first selling and then brought back — and at the Brooklyn terminals: We have retail stores of various types: large markets carrying meats, groceries, fruits, and vegetables ; chains of grocery stores and individual grocers, butchers, dairy stores, fruit and vegetable men, and delicatessen stores. Of late years there has been a considerable increase in the number of small neighborhood stores, and, while the system makes necessary some duplication of overhead expense and service, they are a great convenience to the majority of buyers and are so regarded. So many people live in small apartments where there is no space to store supplies for more than a few days' consumption that they must buy often and in small quantities, and, to save time, nearby. The convenience and personal service of these small stores outweigh many advantages that the large markets offer. The main advantage of the large retail market now lies in its ability to buy cheaply in large quantities. If the small retailer can have access to a terminal market where he can buy goods before they have passed through two or three hands, and can learn to combine with other retailers in buying, he will be able to compete, not only in service but in price, -vyith the large retail market. There has been an increase in the number of small neighborhood stores which deal in a few articles and sell their entire stock every day or two. This approximates the practice of the pushcart dealer, who is the cheapest retailer in the trade. 14 V. PRICES Many elements go to make up the prices the consumers in the city pay for farm produce. Chief of these are — Costs of production. Grading and packing. Transportation. Costs of selling by — Commission merchants and wholesalers. Jobbers. Retailers. Regrading and repacking. Trucking. Storage. Loss. In general, the costs of production in recent years have increased. The trend of population toward the cities has lessened the available supply of farm labor. In many places where a few years ago farm labor could be had at $2.25 a day farmers are now actually suffering for want of labor at $2.50 a day. Cultivation has grown more intensive and the use of costly fertilizers has become common. Better fruits and vegetables are being produced to meet the growing demand for better quality, but often by costly methods that do not necessarily increase the quantity of production. The market to-day demands more careful grading, and transportation over great dis- tances, more careful packing than formerly, all of which means added cost for labor. In most instances where prices have risen in the last ten years the cost of transportation has remained a constant factor. The cost of railroad transportation is not high, though rates on small lots are much higher and service slower than on carloads, and it does not add a large percentage to the cost of food. It averages 7 mills per ton mile, as compared with 3 mills per ton mile for transportation over inland waterways, and 23 cents per ton mile for transportation by horse-drawn truck. In other words, a ton of freight could be transported by rail nearly 700 miles for what it would cost to carry it 20 miles by horse-drawn conveyance. The ill effects of the long time required for such long hauls are obviated by the use of ventilated and refrigerated cars, and, in comparison with those of wagon transporta- tion, are offset by the greater damage caused by the jolting of a wagon. This very low railroad rate in comparison with the cost of trucking puts a distant producer almost on an equal footing with the one nearby who drives to market, and tends to equalize conditions throughout the country. The general wholesale price levels that prevail on most commodities are the result of a balance of forces over which the city has little control. The practice of large individual shippers and producers' associations of shipping in carload lots and diverting shipments in transit to the most favorable markets, and the extended use of refrigera- tion in storing surplus products, have tended to give stability to markets and to level up prices in all the large markets of the country. Production, however, is hampered by a lack of good markets in the large cities. Even low prices are not so great a burden on the farmer as uncertainty of being able to market his goods. If the farmer can be sure of a market for his goods he will produce more, and can afford to take a lower price, and still make more money than he did before. For example, he can raise 200 bushels of potatoes for very little more than the cost of raising 100 bushels. If he sells the 100 bushels for SO cents a IS bushel they will bring $50. If he sells the 200 bushels for 40 cents a bushel they will bring $80. Certainty of a market will induce him to raise 200 bushels, to the benefit both of himself and the consumer. Our lack of good markets tends, therefore, to keep out of the city foodstuffs that we might consume and our lack of good dis- tributing facilities in the city adds a large percentage of cost to the goods we receive. This percentage can be reduced by providing better facilities for wholesale distribution, and prices to that extent lessened, while a larger percentage of what the consumer pays will be returned to the farmer. The most expensive part of the distributing system is the retailing. Analyses of price increments from producer to consumer show the greatest percentage of increase to be between the wholesaler's price and the retailer's price. This means that the costs of distribution in the city are greater than the costs of getting goods to the city, or that the means used are much less efficient, or both. The retailer is not to blame for the large increase which he adds to the price. His services are many times more complex and costly in themselves than the services of any of the other middlemen. These dealers are under expense for rent and advertising, for getting their supplies to their stores, for maintaining sanitary conditions and attractive appearance, for telephone and delivery service and carrying credit accounts. The habit of telephoning and demanding delivery many times a day — a practice which in the aggregate probably adds a considerable percentage to the cost of food — has become common, and it is not to be expected that it will be broken easily. Every step toward better living conditions has its price and must be judged ac- cording to whether it is worth that price. Precautions for cleanliness, such as putting goods in packages, and wrapping fruit in tissue paper, and the convenience of having a multiplicity of small stores with their duplication of service, all mean increased cost, and, so long as the public demands these things and pays the price, business will continue to provide them. If the retail dealer can find a market such as a wholesale terminal market, where he can buy his goods cheaper, he will be able to sell them cheaper. Especially will this be so with the small dealers who now must keep horse and wagon to go to market. If they can have their goods delivered to them by automobile trucks from the market for a nominal charge one of their expenses will be lessened. Another cause of expense to the retail dealer is the fact that, while he deals mainly in a small number of articles, he often thinks it necessary to invest his capital in a large number of articles which remain on show in his store and are seldom bought. This is dead capital, which adds to his expense. It has been suggested, and the idea is being tried out in some places, that retail dealers should have different prices for the same goods, according to the service they render. For example, one price for cash sales to people who carry the goods away themselves ; a higher price for cash and delivery ; a still higher price for credit and delivery. This would ensure the customer who paid cash and carried away his goods. the minimum price and save him from paying the bills of other customers who bought goods on credit and failed to pay their bills. It is an open question whether such a plan will be feasible. The same end will probably be reached, in some neighborhoods at least, by the establishment of small stores dealing in a few articles and selling for cash to customers who live near enough to carry the goods away. The greatest fault of the present retailing system is the inflexibility of prices. They fail to reflect the fluctuations of wholesale prices so greatly that the wholesale market may be glutted and goods be spoiling in the freight yards, and the retail prices through the city be scarcely depressed. This condition is due to many causes: A season of high prices will accustom the public to regard those prices as normal, with the result that they either cease to buy the article or view with suspicion goods 16 •marked at a lower figure. The public knows very little about wholesale prices, as they are not reported in a way to reach average consumers ; consequently the demand for goods is not formed intelligently. The system of marketing goods through a long series of dealers tends toward rigidity in demand and price. Both jobber and retailer are cautious about buying more than their accustomed trade will move off, and will rather buy the usual quantity and hold it at a profitable price than take the risk of buying freely when the market is low and working up a demand for the goods. Better markets that will put the retailer in direct touch with primary market conditions, together with greater publicity of wholesale prices, will un- doubtedly make him and his trade more responsive to conditions of supply. VI. PRESENT FACILITIES FOR DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE CITY We have in New York large markets for many commodities — such as the Produce Exchange, the Stock Exchange, the Wool Exchange, and the Cotton Exchange— but we have no Food Exchange. The New York market for fresh produce is not centered in any one place, except in the case of a few products, such as California fruits, which are marketed on the Erie piers. The idea of a large central market where the maximum of products and the maximum of buyers can meet does not obtain in the provisioning of the city: the business is conducted on a minimum basis, every dealer buying only the goods which he can dispose of to customers with whom he comes in personal contact. The primary food market of the city comprises a large district in lower Manhattan, containing the terminals of railroad and steamship lines bringing food to the city, and the warehouses and stores of dealers of all kinds, and a few scattered terminals in the outlying boroughs, where a limited number of products are received and marketed. Then there are various secondary wholesale distributing points or "jobbing" markets, such as Harlem Market at East 102d Street for garden produce, Westchester Avenue and German Place in The Bronx for meats, butter, eggs, cheese, and some produce; and Wallabout Market in Brooklyn for all kinds of produce. Distribution in the city is effected by a series of makeshifts. Where it is possible marketing is conducted on the piers and terminals, and so in places we have the germ of the terminal market idea, but the terminals, as a rule, have not been constructed with this purpose in view and are by no means adequate for the amount of business that must be done. The only public market we have in Manhattan which is in any sense a terminal market is West Washington Market, but it has connection with only one railroad. The fact, however, that marketing is done in this way at all shows that the idea has a foundation in present conditions and has been worked out naturally by business men and is not something to be forced on the trade by theorists from outside. The city's food supplies are brought in chiefly by the following agencies : (1) Nine railroads: the New York Central, the New York, New Haven and Hartford, the Pennsylvania, the Erie, the Baltimore & Ohio, the Delaware, Lacka- wanna & Western, the Lehigh Valley, the Central Railroad of New Jersey, and the Long Island Railroad. (2) Twenty-three steamship lines docking along the Manhattan waterfront, in- tluding the Old Dominion Line, the Clyde Line, and others. Twenty-two steamship lines docking along the Brooklyn waterfront. (3) Wagons from farms within a radius of forty miles coming to Gansevoort and Harlem Markets in Manhattan and Wallabout Market in Brooklyn. In the busiest season between 200 and 300 farm wagons come daily to Gansevoort and Harlem Markets each, and something over 400 to Wallabout. The amount they can bring seems inconsiderable when we consider that one railroad alone averages 100 17 carloads a day of food products the year round, and in the producing season brings between 300 and 400 carloads of produce daily to the market. The great expense of wagon transportation as compared with rail is a factor also that must be con- sidered. The New York Central Railroad is the only one whose tracks reach the Manhattan market district. The New Haven road comes into The Bronx, and the Long Island road into Long Island City, and both these have receiving piers in Manhattan on the East River. Marketing of a few products is done at the New Haven terminal in The Bronx and at terminals of the Long Island Railroad in Long Island City and Brooklyn. The other railroads have their terminals on the Jersey shore of the North River (except the Baltimore & Ohio in Staten Island), and maintain receiving piers in Manhattan on the North River, to which loaded cars are brought on floats. They have, however, no trackage facilities at these points. These roads also make carfloat deliveries where required, at terminals in The Bronx and Brooklyn. The Pennsylvania Railroad brings the greatest quantity of perishables to the city, its piers, Nos. 27, 28, and 29, forming a wholesale market for vegetables and fruits. The Erie brings in 95 per cent, of the California fruits coming here, which are sold at their piers at public auction. Live poultry is brought by other roads and very largely by the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western, the latter road making a specialty of improved cars for this business. The goods that are brought over by these roads on carfioats are unloaded from the cars onto the piers and in many cases are sold there by the consignees and taken away by the buyers — jobbers and retailers. Otherwise they are trucked away by the consignees to be sold at their stores. This is an efficient way of doing business — that is, it is as efficient a way as the business can be done under the present condi- tions — ^but the space on the piers is insufficient to accommodate buyers, sellers, goods and trucks without great delays, which cause expense and considerable spoilage of goods, because the construction of the piers is, in most cases, not such as will protect the goods during the long delays from harmful temperatures and other bad weather conditions, and the city has now grown too great in size to depend on a primary market in only one borough. In seasons when the receipts are heavy it not infre- quently happens that the congestion at the Manhattan terminals will hold back carloads of goods in the Jersey yards for days before they can be discharged for sale. Sometimes they are held back until they spoil and are a total loss to producer and consumer. There are now no markets organized in such a way that they can take this excess. This condition indicates how important it is to have satisfactory terminals as feeders for the retail markets of the city. A great saving and much more rapid movement of goods would be effected if the city had a system of terminal markets where loaded cars could be taken off of the floats and run into the market buildings, where the goods could be sold directly from the cars and delivered to the buyers with only one handling, and where goods shipped in refrigerator cars could be unloaded directly in favorable temperatures. The present primary market in Manhattan is too congested and too far away from the rapidly growing outlying boroughs to be the base of supplies for the greater percentage of the retailers of the city. The time and labor of going to this market are too great and the dealers are forced to buy from the nearer jobbing centers. This lengthens the chain of middlemen and makes much trucking necessary. It is estimated that there are, on an average, over 1,000 trucks working in the market district daily, and that a truck must earn $7 a day to pay for itself. This alone im- poses a daily tax on our food supply of $7,000, which does not include the cost of all the grocers' wagons that make daily trips of from 2 or 3 to IS miles to reach the wholesale market. Wallabout Market is an important distributing center for Brooklyn, but the lack 18 of facilities for receiving consignments of freight prevents it from being more than a secondary market. Much of what is sold there is brought from Manhattan by truck and marketing is not done on the docks that they have. Trackage into the market would eliminate one extra handling of goods as well as facilitate the entrance of more goods and so encourage shippers to consign there. Harlem Market at East 102d Street is centrally located for a vast population. It is the base of supplies for most uptown Manhattan and Bronx retailers. This is a privately owned market to which farmers come, chiefly from Long Island, crossing the 99th Street ferry from College Point. The charges for market wagons are some- what higher than in Gansevoort Market, but quite as many farmers go there because the long haul downtown is saved. The market has no connection with any railroad or other transportation lines. In the Harlem Market itself most of the produce comes in by the farmers' wagons, but there has grown up in that immediate neighborhood a large center of produce commission men who get their produce in the usual way — by wagon from down town. ' There is no distributing market whatever for the Borough of Richmond, though the presence of the Baltimore & Ohio terminal at St. George should make it easy to develop one. At present there are not even means to distribute to the dealers of the island the part that they need of what the island itself produces, more than is provided by the private transactions between individual growers and retailers. Beyond one or two commission men there, there are no means for wholesale distribution. It is impossible for the railroad to develop the car-lot business there without a terminal market to dispose of the goods. Wagons from the farms come up by the ferry to Gansevoort Market, and the retailers come up to the same district to buy. It is not unlikely that they sometimes buy Staten Island produce and truck it back again. They must, of course, buy in a market where there is variety enough to supply their needs. The Borough of The Bronx is the most rapidly growing borough of the city and it has much undeveloped territory. Marketing facilities for this part of the city and for the communities to the north that draw their supplies from the New York market are almost non-existent. Two important railroads — the New York Central and the New York, New Haven & Hartford — run directly into the borough and have large terminals there, and the New York Connecting Bridge, now building, will bring in trains from the Pennsylvania system, but there is no modern market there where a dealer can find any variety of supplies. The New Haven has a small market building with 22 compartments at its terminal at 132d Street and Lincoln Avenue, but this road brings a limited number of commodities and the chief trade at this point is in Maine potatoes. The New York Central permits marketing from the cars in its Melrose yard at ISSth Street and Morris Avenue and a considerable variety of produce is to be found there. At Westchester Avenue and German Place there is a small aggregation of commission dealers and branches of the meat packing houses, but nothing that constitutes a modern market. The dealers for the most part draw their supplies from the jobbers and wholesalers in Harlem and Gansevoort Markets, and from these points all goods are trucked out to the borough. Even fish, which is brought down through the borough in large quantities by the New Haven road, is all lightered from the railroad terminal to the Fulton Market district and there sold at wholesale, and what is used in The Bronx must be trucked up from there. Produce brought down by the New York Central is also taken through the borough down on the west side tracks to the Gansevoort Market district, and anything used in The Bronx must be taken back by truck. Several other railroads have car- float terminals in the borough, but shippers do not consign food products there because there is no market to dispose of them. \ Oil Present Public Markefs Present Roi/roac/ Terminals tvliere Foods tuffs ore marketed Present Private IVholesale Marke/s Proposed Terminal Markets A Principal Steamship Piers where Foodstuffs ore brcuc/ht ta —Pai/rood lines Corf/pgf I^Di^ffs c p 4 19 VII. PRESENT PUBLIC MARKETS. The present public markets of the city are : West Washington, Gansevoort, Fulton, Washington, Jeflferson and Delancey Street, in Manhattan; Wallabout, in Brooklyn. They can hardly be said to constitute a system at all and do not meet the needs of present conditions. A brief description of them will show how little the city has done up to this time toward handling the provisioning of the city and considering its problems in a large way. Fulton Market Fulton Market is located at Fulton and South Streets, where it was established in 1821. It is a one-story building about 200 x 170 feet, 'in which are sold meat, vegetables, and fish. It is chiefly known for its fish trade, as it is immediately across the street from the wholesale market of the Fish Mongers' Association on the East River waterfront. Years ago the market was patronized largely by people living in the neighborhood and by those who went home by way of Fulton Ferry; it is now, however, so far away from residential neighborhoods and from the traffic lines that it has practically no retail trade. It is mainly a jobbing market, supplying steamships and hotels. It has no connection with any transportation line, supplies being brought to it entirely by truck. The physical condition of the market is very poor, and it is estimated that it would cost $60,000 to put it in proper condition. The Board of Health now has a violation against it because of its unsanitary condition. Space in the market now rents for $1.41 per square foot per year. An estimate of the total income and costs shows an average yearly expense to taxpayers for the last three years of $1,075 for maintaining this market, with an actual profit in 1912 of $63.78. The fact that there is now no demand for stands in the market and many are vacant, and that it would be necessary to spend at least $60,000 to put the market in proper condition, on which investment there is no prospect of return, and the lack of any evidence that the continuance of the market is of any benefit, direct or indirect, to the public, would seem to indicate that Fulton Market has outlived its usefulness and should be discontinued. Washington Market Washington Market is located at Fulton and West Streets and covers an area of about 175 X 203 feet. It was established in 1812. It is a jobbing and retail market of the same general character as Fulton, but the building is in much better condition and it has more business. Meat, fish and game, butter, eggs, cheese, fruits, and vegetables are sold there. It is much nearer the primary markets, except for fish, than Fulton Market. Washington Market is not on any transportation terminal and contains no space or facilities for cold storage other than the iceboxes of the dealers. The building is in fair condition, $40,000 having been spent on it in repairs in 1911. In producing an adequate return on the money invested it is at a disadvantage in the fact that it is only a one-story building. The ground rent there is high and there is only the one floor to produce revenue. Space in the market rents for about $1.40 per square foot per year. There is competition for stands there because the business is good. The rate has always been fiat for all locations, but some places in the market are so much more advantageous for trade than others that a reappor- tioning of the rentals is now being worked out which will increase the income on the market by about $7,000 a year. The average cost to taxpayers on Washington Market for the last three years, 20 exclusive of $37,000 for repairs in 1911, has been $18,380. The City would not, we think, be justified in continuing the market were it not that the market was put in fair condition in 1911 and plans are now under way to put it in first-class condition and make it self-supporting. This market, too, performs a useful function as a base of supplies for many of the restaurants of the downtown section, where many hundred thousand people get one meal a day, and it has a large trade with many families accustomed for years to dealing there. It is not, however, accessible to any large percentage of the consumers of th§ city, and the prices there have no effect on retail prices throughout the city. Jefferson Market Jefferson Market is located at the corner of Greenwich Street and Sixth Avenue and occupies about 36,000 square feet. It is about a mile from the wholesale markets and its trade is mostly retail. If a public retail market of this type can be successful this one should be. It is in a thickly settled section, with a large industrial popula- tion on the west and the wealthier people of the Washington Square section on the east. The trade in the market, however, is not large and is mainly with the people on the east. Prices in the market, as compared with those in private stores in the neighborhood, are high. The market is valued at $190,000 and space in it rents for about $1.00 a square foot. The average cost to the taxpayers for this market has been about $5,000 a year for the past three years. It is difficult to see any justification under these circumstances for the city's continuing the market, which does not serve the general public. West Washington Market West Washington Market was established in 1889 at Gansevoort and West Streets and covers an area 369 x 400 feet. There are ten buildings — two-story structures built in blocks of twenty stands each, with marketing space on the first floor and offices on the second. The buildings are in fair condition. The assessed valuation of the market is $1,100,000 and it pays the city a profit over all costs of over $30,000 a year. It is entirely a wholesale market, in which meat, garden produce, and live poultry are sold. The largest sales are in live poultry. The market is on the water front but has no facilities for receiving goods by water. It receives a good deal by rail. The dealers in the market are, as a rule, direct consignees. The stalls in the market average in size from 12 x 18 to 18 x 25 feet, and rent for about $150 a year. They are fully occupied. When one becomes vacant it is put up at auction and sold to the highest bidder. When the occupant of a stand dies the stand is no longer transmitted as part of his estate, as was allowed formerly, and the practice of sub-letting stands at high rentals has been stopped. This market supplies the whole city with live poultry. It is not unusual for a single dealer to handle five carloads of live poultry in a day. The market has no connection with any railroad but the New York Central, goods from other roads being brought to it by truck. The dealers sometimes sell their goods in the Jersey yards and sometimes sell at the market without unloading from the truck. There is more business done here than in any other of the city's markets. Gansevoort Market Gansevoort Market is an open market square, bounded by West, Little West 12th Washington, and Gansevoort Streets. It has no buildings of any kind. It is by legislation restricted to the use of farmers and gardeners for the sale of products 21 they themselves have grown. Each man is charged a fee of 25 cents daily. The assessed valuation of the land is $850,000 and the average annual loss on the market to the city is $40,000. The farmers drive in to this market from a radius of forty miles around the city, mostly from Long Island. In the season there are from 200 to 300 daily. They take their places in the evening, stable their horses in the neighborhood, and sell in the early morning hours, from three or four o'clock on. There is no protection of any kind from bad weather conditions. The market is not large enough to be very elastic. There is often a surplus of goods not in demand by the buyers there that will sell for next to nothing because there are no means of getting it to other buyers. It does not pay the farmer in his busy season to stay all day in the market; he needs the time on his farm and is better off if he can sell his stuff quickly in bulk to a wholesaler. The number of farmers to make use of such a market as Gansevoort is not likely to increase, as farm lands are all the time being crowded farther and farther away from the city. It is doubtful if there is enough benefit conferred on anybody by this market to war- rant devoting such a valuable piece of property exclusively to this purpose, at such an expense to the city at large. Provision could be made in any new market buildings that are planned for the farmers' market, where there would be better protection to the market and less expense to the city. Delancey Street Market The Delancey Street Market is a pushcart market located under the approach to Williamsburgh Bridge at Pitt and Willett Streets, where fish, vegetables, and fruits, and miscellaneous dry goods are sold. It occupies space 400 x 100 feet which is not rentable for any other purpose. It was established to give the poor people of the neighborhood a market with as little overhead expense as possible. There is no build- ing, the only protection to the market being the bridge structure. In the fish market places rent for from $1 to $2 a week, according to location. There is competition for vacant places, the applicants drawing lots for them. In the rest of the market a fee of 25 cents a day is charged for each cart. Plans are under way to improve the market by putting in a new floor and lighting with electricity. As the' maintenance expense is low and no charge is made against the market for interest or exemption from taxation, the land being of no value for any other purpose, the net profit to the city on this market last year was $10,000. There is more land under the bridge approach at this point that is now vacant and of use for no other purpose, which offers a possible site for a live poultry market, should it be decided to move that trade from West Washington Market. The bulk of the live poultry is now sold in New Jersey and trucked over and could as easily be brought to one place as the other, and for anything coming by water there is good dockage at the foot of Delancey Street. Wallabout Market Wallabout Market in Brooklyn has an area of about 36 acres, of irregular shape. It is located on lands formerly owned by the Federal Government, extending from Clinton Avenue to East Avenue, to Wallabout Basin. In this market the city owns the land and the ground is leased out in lots to individuals, on ten-year leases, with a renewal of ten years at the expiration of that time, after appraisal. They build on the sites two-story buildings, which must conform in architecture to the plans of the buildings in the market, which they occupy or sublet, as the case may be, and on which they pay taxes to the city. The lots average in size 25 x 50 feet. The assessed valuation of the market property is $1,150,000. The average yearly net 22 return to the city, taking into account the amount received in taxes on the buildings, is $8,000. The average ground rent per stand is $17 a month. The valuation here given does not include the bulkhead property, which is under the control of the Dock Department, and which yields a large return in dock rents. There are over 100 lots in the market still unoccupied, which, when taken up, will add considerably to the return to the city. The streets in the market are well paved and wide, ranging from 45 to 100 feet in width. On Washington Avenue there is a trolley line connecting to all points in Brooklyn. There are also a number of carlines on Flushing Avenue, which leads from the market to the business center of Brooklyn; it is one of the main arteries of traffic east and west. There are terminal facilities on the canal and on the Wallabout Basin, where piers are maintained by the New York Central, Lehigh Valley, Baltimore & Ohio, West Shore and Pennsylvania Railroads. The Delaware, Lackawanna & Western has a terminal and yard immediately adjoining the market. There are no trackage facilities in the market, so that it is impossible to sell goods from the cars. Cars that are lightered there are brought into the slip only and their contents must be trucked into the market. If there were track connections it would be an easy matter to run the cars right into the market, and one intermediate handling would be saved. There is now much trucking of goods over from New York; all the Florida fruit is trucked over; all the fresh vegetables coming in the winter time on the Old Dominion Line are trucked over. Wallabout Basin is deep enough now for tugs and lighters, but will have to be dredged before vessels of any size can come in. A great many farmers drive in to Wallabout Market from a radius of 40 miles around New York. Each wagon pays 25 cents a day for space in the open market square. The highest number of wagons to come in any one day in 1912 was 445. There is no fish market there at the present time and the market has no refrigerat- ing plant. Cold storage is supplied by an outside company and no ice is used. Sales in the market are entirely private; there are no auctions. Wallabout Market is a very good distributing market now and is located conveniently for the dealers ; it ' could, however, be greatly improved by the addition of railroad tracks and a refriger- ating plant, so that goods could be brought into the market without change of temperature and much waste saved. VIIL PROPOSED MARKET SYSTEM FOR THE CITY The foregoing analysis of present conditions should make clear the fact that the marketing of farm products in this city to-day is a problem of distribution from transportation terminals; it can be made efficient only by the coordination of the collection, transportation, and distribution of foodstuffs. In other words, we must develop the type of market here that will make for the quickest receipt and disposal of goods. We must educate shippers to the advantages and needs of this market and the methods to be employed by them to ensure quick marketing of their goods, and the buying public here to watch market conditions so that they may buy more intelligently and so that there may be popular demand for the goods that are plentiful. Only a market which distributes foodstuffs quickly and economically will encourage producers to ship to it. A study of the geography of the city, the present conditions and methods of marketing, i. e., congestion at downtown terminals, inadequacy of present terminals amount of trucking and long truck hauls necessary, etc., the difficulties that confront shippers, and the forces that now operate to keep goods from reaching our market, points to the conclusion that the establishment of large terminal wholesale markets' 23 in the five boroughs of the city is the first essential step in the bettering of conditions. We have in this city two distinct problems — the problem of the primary or wholesale marketing of the goods when they reach the city in large unbroken lots, and the problem of retail distribution. Though investigation shows the largest increase in prices to be added by retailing, it also shows that the greatest hindrances to efficient distribution exist in the wholesale marketing of the food products received here. Part of the high cost of retailing is due to the quantity and kind of service that the business demands, as compared with wholesaling, and part is due to a lack of responsiveness of retail markets to condi- tions of supply, because of the chaotic condition of the present wholesale market. Producer and consumer are not kept far apart now by the retailers to any such degree as they are by the cumbersome methods of wholesaling. We have in the city a large number of small grocery and provision stores which serve the people very well. They cater to the needs of their regular customers and are convenient supply depots for apartment house dwellers who have no room to sfore supplies and wish to buy often and nearby. A type of municipal retail market that can compete with these neighborhood stores has yet to be developed. Consumers as a class are intensely conservative and slow to change established habits. If they are used to marketing in a certain way at certain kinds of stores, they are not easily induced to change. It would be useless to spend public moneys on a system of retail municipal markets, the success of which would depend upon a con- siderable change in the habits of the buying public and in the aims of marketmen. The possibility that the city could offer space in its retail markets to dealers at lower rents than those demanded in other buildings does not necessarily mean that for that reason the dealers would sell goods cheaply. On the contrary, their low rents, and the necessarily higher prices outside, would give them a chance for a profit which previous experience indicates they would not share virillingly with the public. This condition was found to prevail in one of the retail markets of Berlin. It is difficult to see how it could be avoided in a public retail market unless the city itself, through its employees, went into the actual buying and selling of food in the markets, or attempted a system of price regulation — ^practices whose desirability is question- able. Retail prices will be lowered when all are given facilities for buying cheaply and when the forces of demand and supply are given free play. Systems of municipal retail markets have not been a success where tried in large cities under conditions similar to our own. In Berlin 12 markets out of a system of 14 have been abandoned. They have been gradually given up and the buildings turned over to other uses. The same thing has happened in Paris, where out of an original system of 33 only half are now in operation. Only those in direct con- nection with the terminal markets have been found to be of value. The case of Jefferson Market in New York is typical of what happens here and elsewhere with this type of market. The trade in Fulton and Washington Markets is becoming more and more a jobbing trade and less a retail trade — supplying large customers like boarding-houses, hotels, and restaurants. The most flourishing public market we have now is West Washington, which is a wholesale market, and, in a way, a terminal market, though its possibilities as such in the way of waterfront development and railroad connection have not been made full use of. As it is it pays the city a profit of $34,000 annually on the investment. Whatever form the retail distribution here eventually takes — whether it be private stores, municipal markets, cooperative stores, or what not, it will be essential to have a large, well-organized wholesale market in each borough. That is the first step. The type of retail distributor is of little importance if it has difficulty in getting supplies. The idea of wholesale terminal markets is not new outside of New York; it is not 24 new in New York, but it has yet to be recognized and applied here in a large way. In Berlin they have had a wholesale terminal market for over twenty years, the only fault being that it is not now large enough to accommodate the trade that seeks it; they have one in Munich, in Frankfort, London, and other cities abroad. It is the recognized type of municipal market in the larger cities of Germany, where they have given the subject close study. Its effectiveness lies in the fact that such a market cuts out unnecessary steps — it does not introduce radical changes in busi- ness methods, but rather gives business men the means for more efficient service. It is axiomatic that business is conservative and slow to change its methods and habits. We recognize the futility of proposing radical changes theoretically alluring or untried methods that will meet with distrust The lack of system in the wholesale marketing here to-day is a handicap to efficient service and a cause of great expense. This expense is of three kinds : one, the actual cost added to the goods for the trucking and rehandling necessary ; two, the loss of goods deteriorated through exposure to harmful temperatures after unloading from the cars or through bruising in being handled many times; and, three, the loss of goods kept from market because of the lack of facilities. These three factors would be eliminated in proper terminal markets. It is likely also that in time the expense and loss in regr^ding goods would be reduced as the market management makes known throughout the producing sections the methods of grading and marking most advantageous in the market. The distribution of food in the city to-day, as has been shown, takes place chiefly from the primary market in lower Manhattan. While it is true that in most places the ideal condition is to have the wholesale marketing done in one place, where all buyers and sellers may congregate, and that a division of the wholesale market results in a loss in economy, the results of the policy of concentration that confront us to-day in New York lead to the conclusion that greater economy will be effected in this city by a division of the primary market among the five boroughs. New York City is divided by natural waterways and political lines into what are practically five cities. It has grown too large to depend on one market, and the trade in that market has grown to such proportions that we could hardly build a terminal market large enough to accommodate it without congestion. Even if we could, it would not do away with the necessity of having jobbers' markets to reach out to the retailers in outlying sections, and the latter would be brought no nearer the sources of supply. We believe, also, that, for the present at least, the number of such markets should be restricted to one for each borough, so that each may be assured of as large a supply as possible and may attract as large a number of buyers as possible. These wholesale terminal markets should be what their name implies — markets on the terminals of as many transit lines as possible, so that they will be supplied with a full range of commodities. They should be union freight terminals with modern marketing facilities. No one railroad brings a great enough variety of products to supply a market with all lines. They should have sufficient space for handling cars from different lines with dispatch. Refrigeration should be provided for both temporary and long storage, and there should be refrigerated rooms into which refrigerated cars could discharge their contents without change of temperature and consequent injury to the goods. The handling of produce should be by machinery as far as possible. Separate parts of the markets should be devoted to the sale of different products, but the market should be so arranged that a dealer could buy his various supplies without going too far. Connected with each market should be a post office, bank, telegraph office, public telephone, restaurant, infirmary, and comfort station. Of course, many details must be left for future elaboration, but it is prob- able that economy will be effected by having a delivery service by automobile trucks 25 belonging to the market. Each market should also have a retail department and a canning and preserving plant. A prominent feature of nearly all foreign municipal wholesale markets is the provision for sales at auction of all goods consigned directly to the market, con- ducted by bonded auctioneers licensed by the city. Such sales are not provided for in any of our public markets at present — there are no markets to which shippers can now consign directly; they must send goods to individual dealers. The auction method is now used here in disposing of California fruits and some few other prod- ucts, and has recently been introduced into the live poultry trade. The terminal markets should be self-supporting, the rents charged being sufficient to pay interest on the money invested and a sinking fund, and to cover the loss on the property by exemption from taxation. The markets should not be operated with the purpose of making them a source of revenue to the city, but every effort should be made to have them operated in such a way that the costs of distribution shall be minimized and prices kept at normal levels. A system cannot hold together or work for a definite purpose unless it is or- ganized and its control vested in a competent executive body. Too many city depart- ments now have authority over the markets. Their powers should be vested in one Department of Markets, to be created by amendment of the Charter. The control is now so split up that (1) the Board of Aldermen has charge of the selection of sites; (2) the Borough President has charge of maintenance; (3) the Department of Finance collects the rents; (4) the Department of Health has charge of the sanitary conditions of the markets and the inspection of food; (5) the Fire Department takes measures for protection from fire; (6) the Police Department makes traffic regula- tions, etc.; (7) the Bureau of Weights and Measures has its authority; and (8) the Department of Docks and Ferries collects dock rents where markets are on the water front. These functions should be centered in one Department, which should exercise supervision over the entire marketing system of the city. It should keep a record of all goods received and sold at the markets, maintain a system of inspection of foodstuffs, issue bulletins of supplies received and market prices, establish standard requirements for packing and grading, etc. The executive functions of such a Department of Markets should be vested in a Board of Market Commissioners, one frorn each borough, to be appointed by the Borough President, to serve for a term of years or during good behavior, such Board to choose its own chairman. Such Market Commissioners, as well as the market auctioneers, should be forbidden to have any personal interest in the business done in the markets. There are within a radius of a few hundred miles of New York many small farmers on whom present conditions are a heavy burden. On their farms quantities of foodstuffs go to waste every year because the cost of getting them to market is too great. From some places distant for passengers only two hours from New York it takes from ten days to two weeks to get freight here. This is too long a time for perishable products and there is no advantage in sending by express as the rates are too high. In many cases, too, the farmer does not know a reliable dealer to whom to ship. The terminal markets with their auction sales will open the way for these goods to reach the city. As soon as they are in operation it will be possible for the railroads that reach out through the nearby territory to run daily produce trains as they now run milk trains, to which farmers may take produce in any quantities to be sold in the markets at auction, or otherwise, as desired. They can- not do this now as there are no means of disposing, of the goods when they reach the city, unless they are consigned to dealers. Your Commission has prepared plans for such a market as has been described, to be constructed in the Borough of The Bronx, based on carefully computed estimates 26 •of present and future consumption in the territory such a market will serve. (For detailed description, see Appendix.) This market will cover 28 acres and will cost, with the land, in the neighborhood of $10,000,000. At an average annual rental of 3S cents per square foot of rentable space, it will return seven per cent, on the invest- ment—more than sufficient to pay all the charges of the undertaking. Rental rates in present public and private markets are much higher and the facilities offered much less. The plans include a freight yard with ample unloading platforms; broad drive- ways for trucks, so arranged that incoming and outgoing traffic will not conflict; celling and storage space; auction rooms; power house; retail market; and ample ■waterfront facilities. IX. RECOMMENDATIONS Your Commission recommends the establishment of a wholesale terminal market in «ach of the boroughs of the city as follows : Manhattan In the neighborhood of West Washington and Gansevoort Markets. It will be necessary to plan this market so that the railroads coming to New York can co- ordinate to run their cars into it and have their freight handled with celerity. The plan proposed for the West Side Terminal Improvement, although mainly devoted to the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad, includes a reservation by the City of tracks for otlier railroads as well. It might be that, if the location of the Manhattan wholesale market were to be made for the first time, a site further north in the neighborhood of 50th Street would be selected, but trade is very reluctant to ■move, and the fact that the banks, cold storage warehouses, and present business of the trade are located in this neighborhood makes the plan to take the market away from this location impractical. Besides that, outgoing steamers and trains must be ■supplied and the erection of high buildings in the lower end of Manhattan containing a very large population, which must be fed at least once a day, makes it desirable that a market should be located in their vicinity. The plan suggested by the Ganse- voort Market Business Men's Association and others seems a good one, but it was "based on the idea that the present West Washington Market was to be taken for steamship piers. Under the law it was the duty of the City to provide another market site in the Ninth Ward of the City of New York. If the plan to take West Wash- ington Market for steamship piers is abandoned, the present West Washington and Gansevoort Market sites could be combined and, with some additional property, make an excellent site for a new market at small expense. It should be decided at •once which of these plans is to be adopted. The need of the market is very pressing and work should be begun upon one or the other plan at once. Brooklyn Brooklyn has a most excellent market in Wallabout Market. It has 36 acres of land and is located on the waterfront. At present carfloat connections bring loaded freight cars to it, but there are no trackage facilities to take them into it. Possibly in the future it will have direct rail communication by land. Broad streets lead from it and it is within easy distance by automobile truck of any part of the horough. At comparatively small expense the improvements necessary to make a modern market could be made— namely, to dredge out the Wallabout Basin so that loaded vessels of size could come into it, to erect a cold storage plant sufficient for the needs of the market, to lay railroad tracks on Clinton Avenue so that loaded cars 27 may be run directly into the market, increasing its freight capacity and eliminating the trucking of goods from dock to store, and to construct a retail annex. Your Commission recommends that these improvements be made. Greknpoint or Long Island City A site for a market has been urged by the Greenpoint Taxpayers and Citizens' Association at Greenpoint, near the proposed Barge Terminal. The plot is nine acres in size. At present it would have to depend upon carfloat connections for supplies brought by rail, but that might be remedied by a marginal railroad if a market were located there. The question of whether a market in that neighborhood should be located at Greenpoint or in Long Island City must be determined by the local authori- ties. A market in Long Island City would have the benefit of direct rail connections with the Pennsylvania-Long Island railroad system and the New Haven Railroad over the Hell Gate Bridge and the New York Connecting Railway., For that reason your Commission recommends the choice of a site in Long Island City, but thinks that the local authorities of both places should be consulted in the matter. The Bronx Your Commission begs leave to submit plans for a market in The Bronx, which it has prepared to serve as a model for markets throughout the city. It is recognized that each market must be modified in form to meet existing conditions, but the prin- ciple of the coordination of railroad and waterfront facilities will obtain for all the markets. The market is planned to cover 28 acres of ground. It will cost, for the land, about $2,000,000, and, for the buildings, about $7,850,000. It is estimated that at a rental of 35 cents per square foot of rentable space it will return 7 per cent, on the investment. It will serve the population of Harlem from UOth Street north — with about 800,000 people ; The Bronx, with about 600,000 people ; and New Rochelle, Mt. Vernon, and Yonkers. Your Commission recommends that steps be taken at once toward the construction of this market. Richmond A site in the neighborhood of St. George, Staten Island, is recommended for the Richmond market. A great deal of the produce consumed in the Borough of Rich- mond is grown there during certain period of the year and could be collected and sold in the market. It has good railroad facilities, which are likely to be improved in the future. Department of Markets Your Commission recommends that a new Department of Markets of the City be created to supervise the food distribution in the city; that the control of such Department be vested in a Board of five Market Commissioners, one for each Bor- ough, to be appointed by the Borough Presidents, such Board to choose its own chairman; that the jurisdiction over the city's markets now vested in other depart- ments be centered in the new Department of Markets. Auction Sales It is recommended that sales at auction be made permissive in the several public markets. They should be conducted by bonded auctioneers, licensed by the city, to whom goods could be consigned by persons who desired to sell their goods at auction. 28 It is not supposed that a very large percentage of the goods coming to the market would be sold in this way, because many shippers would prefer to do business through private dealers, but the fact that such sales could be made would tend to steady prices; such auction sales would also serve to fix the market prices for each day. It is recognized that the great bulk of certain kinds of perishable goods must be sold within a few hours after the opening of the market, and that it would not be feasible to auction them all oS in sufficiently small quantities. The existence of the auctioneers, however, would make it possible for the grower who had no private consignee to send his goods to the market and have them sold by the public auctioneer. ^^^^"^ . Cheese fruihtJ-c.^ WashinghnMaM^^^i^. FhJihFarmam/pairyjf^-'' ^ Rvduc^s ,Mear era-) »a^--^|SyB Vu R letables^ osEtc Shamsh/pPfers ivhere fd(x/shf/s affdPrxx/ace are/fanef/e(/.shown^/K/s^ ffof/roaa » » „ n „ „ M l/isge^ai/eMofi/fefs shown ^hus, |||| ' /cefYoMorms n „m^^ ^ourAfa/^e^ I. EXISTING STEAMSHIP AND RAILROAD TERMINALS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK By W. G. Rainsford Assistant Superintendent of Docks I have interviewed a number of the agents and managers of the larger railroad and steamship companies operating on the New York water front, with a view of securing from them such information as they had at hand relating to the importation of food supplies into the City of New York and the methods employed by them in transferring these food supplies from the piers and warehouses to the wholesale dealers or consignees. The railroad and steamship companies, being common carriers, have no interest in the commodities they handle except to deliver the goods safely at the stations called for by the bill of lading, receiving therefor the tariflf rate fixed by the Trunk Line Association from stated points to the Atlantic seaboard, this rate allowing for storage on the various docks of the railroads, varying from twenty-four hours for perishable freight to three days (exclt(sive of the day of arrival) on canned goods and other package freight, after which time, if the space be required for incoming freight and after advice to the consignee, the goods are rode to storage at the expense of the consignee. On carload lots the railroad company is compelled by law to keep the shipments in storage at Jersey City for a period of ten days, and, if required by the consignee, to deliver same by lighter to any point within lighterage limits of the greater city without additional compensation. All food stuffs and other commodities are removed from the piers and warehouses of the railroad and steamship companies by drays, some of the large wholesale grocers and provision dealers using their own teams for this purpose, while a consider- able number hire outsiders to do this work, the usual rate for a double team being $8.00 per day, or 60 cents per ton when taken by weight. While the cost of nearly all food stuffs has advanced enormously during the last ten years, I do not find that the freight rates have correspondingly increased during the same period, the rates in many instances being the same and in some cases less, due, no doubt, to the rigorous supervision of the Interstate Commerce Commission and to competition. The steamship companies, while not coming under the supefvision of the Inter- state Commerce Commission, have to meet the established rates gf the railroads or do a little better to get a fair share of the business, the cost for handling being about the same in both cases. Outside of perishable freight, the steamship companies handling domestic products allow, on the average, five days for the removal of cargo, the goods being left there entirely at the risk of the consignee. The section of the water front known as the Vegetable Market includes the Baltimore & Ohio pier No. 22, foot of Jay street ; Old Dominion piers Nos. 25 and 26, between North Moore and Beach streets, N. R. ; the Pennsylvania Railroad piers 30 Nos. 27 to 29, between Hubert and Desbrosses streets ; the Clyde Steamship piers Nos. 35 and 36, at Spring and Charlton Streets, respectively; the Mallory Steamship pier No. 38, at the foot of King street, N. R., and Pier No. 47 and sheds adjoining, under permit to the Quebec Steamship Company, at the foot of Perry street, N. R. In the spring of the year (March to July, inclusive), between the hours of 1 and 10 A. M., this whole area is devoted almost entirely to the handling and disposition of green vegetables and fruit. These commodities are sent over the river on floats from the Jersey terminals and transferred from the cars to the several spaces on the pier bulkhead assigned by the railroad company to the dealer for the sale and disposition of his products. The Old Dominion Steamship Company regulates the arrival of its steamers to agree with the unloading time of the railroads, and assigns similar spaces on its piers to the commission merchant for the disposal of his mer- chandise. A joint market for green vegetables is thus established on the piers and bulkheads above referred to, the opening hour of the market being 1 a. m., in the busy season. All. of the green vegetables are shipped to New York in crates, baskets, or barrels. For such green vegetables as are not crated, storage yards and unloading platforms are provided by the railroads on the upland from Twenty-sixth Street to Thirty-seventh Street, inclusive, where produce in carload lots is unloaded. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company averages each month about 35,000 tons of green vegetables and fruit, besides 3,000 tons of butter, 3,000 tons of eggs in cases, 600 tons of dressed poultry, 2,900 tons of canned goods, 165 tons of cereals, and 414 tons of flour, from March to July, inclusive, at its station No. 29, above referred to. This railroad also has other piers where all classes of foodstuffs are received, except green vegetables, namely, Old Piers Nos. 1, 4, and 5, between Battery Place and Mor- ris Street; Piers 11 and 78, at the foot of Thirty-seventh and Thirty-eighth Streets, N. R., as well as a long bulkhead north of 12Sth Street, E. R., and Pier No. 2 and; bulkheads adjoining the Wallabout district, Brooklyn. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, operating through the same section of the country, also brings in large quantities of green vegetables to New York, its market being .!|'. located on Pier No. 22, at the foot of Jay Street, N. R. This railroad also handles^ large quantities of dairy products, considerable canned goods, some cereals, and a quantity of flour. Other stations of the Baltimore & Ohio are located at Pier No. 7, N. R., foot of Rector Street, and on the south side of Pier 66, N. R., foot of Twenty-sixth Street, where all classes of foodstuffs are handled except green vege- tables. The greatest carrier of green vegetables and fruit by boat from the south is the Old Dominion Steamship Company, occupying the piers and bulkheads known as Nos. 25 and 26, located at the foot of North Moore Street and Beach "Street, re- spectively. This company brings to the city daily large consignments of peas, beans, cauliflower, kale, spinach, onions, cabbage, and strawberries. During the busy season two steamers run daily between New York and Newport News, Va The Clyde Line, operating between New York, Charleston, and Jacksonville, also brmgs to this market a limited amount of green vegetables, as well as large quantities of watermelons and other fruits, discharging same at its piers, Nos. 36 and i1, N R., at the foot of Spring and Vandam Streets, respectively The Mallory Line, located at Pier No. 38, N. R., foot of King Street, plying be- tween Galveston and New York, brings to this market large quantities of Texas onions some rice, and considerable other food stuffs. The Quebec Steamship Company, located at Pier No, 47 N R foot of Perry Street operates between New York and points in Bermuda, and brings into this market large quantities of celery, potatoes, kale, spinach, and other green vegetables, same disposition being made of the products as in the case of the railroads and othe steamship companies. •«— .-^ -•fe^.^?. f\/7o{/r n.r^^-'^' Cemi lO M CM W O 5 >0 S38 00 r- (N t^ (N S '^" -" -'^ ■*" 00 lO *-* M O 2 o o o o O C3 O O »o lO 0\ i-( lO fO o >o o ^ lo *9 ■ N ^ O O O 00 CO t>- *o o >o ^ 00 c*3 M t«« >0 o o 00 o t H ^ §i s2§ o o §2 ii° u es ^. 00 8 s s O "I W5 CM d »o N •^^ i i Ei •* w o 3" S CO Ah ^ 45 ^ o • 0» Q » a 5 « 2§ 1,329. 1,500. 5,154. es o » CM a Pi <; 8 CD Z M to o o lO o Ig3 e*j o o o» o ^ a o\ r«j t— o vo t^ O ■* » lo « 1^ o 00 « r3 ■* 46 ^0 \0_ OC Os" S8 :38g 00 cs 00 00 . -^ O N <» ■"!»< CO o O; q d rj • oS § oo" 0\ M- s 8S :S§S3 lO » N 00 . uj « t- m n 00 o. O 00 iH CN O tJ* lO o ^ o ^ o *^ ^ ro w u) >0 0\ r 5 -o Z 2: o MS t-t CO M 47 S^ S d s O N sss • O lO 00 ■ O t* OS ■ M »0 tH « <; o s§ §s §1 I/) I/> < O CO • O «0 \0 00 o» • o ^* to 00 O • N *0 « O O s s d N lO ^ SS! §■»■■ f*3 00 «o >o 00 00 lo in to to O t^ CN «0 ■* N « I 111 3 SS I CO o £h g O u 48 GANSEVOORT MARKET, 1912. Assessed Valuation Land. $850,000.00 Buildings None Total $850,000.00 Original Cost Land Income Wagon fees $8,654. 25 Expenses ^ Cleaners and laborers $3,082 . 12 Horses and carts 2,557. 18 Supplies (janitorial) 1 . 54 Repairs and material 80. 27 CoUector's.salary 750.00 Total $6,472. 11 Interest at 4% on assessed valuation 34,000 .00 40,472 . 1 1 Loss 31,817.85 Loss BY exemption from taxes $15,895 .00 47,712.86 Net loss $47,712.86 DELANCEY STREET MARKET, 1912. Income Land acquired for bridge structure None Buildings None Wagon fees $6,387 . 00 Stand fees 5,267.00 Total $11,654.00 Expenditures Two sweepers (part time), D. S. C $720.00 Horses and carts (part time), (estimated) 720.00 Collector's salary. Department of Finance 1,650.00 Financial, stationery and supplies (estimated) 300.00 3,390.00 Net profit $8,264.00 III. PROPOSED- BRONX MARKET A Wholesale, Not Retail, Market The proposed market is primarily a wholesale market, designed to receive food stufFs from everjrwhere — by rail, by boat, and by farmer's wagon — and to distribute them among the retailers who are performing to-day the function of supplying the ultimate consumer. Its function is not to provide a place where the farmer or pro- ducer can sell at retail directly to the consumer. New York, like most other metro- politan cities, has grown so large, both in area and in population, that it has become physically impossible for the neighboring producers to bring enough supplies to the market, and for the consumer to go to market for his small daily needs. It will handle foodstuffs with the least waste of effort and with the smallest deterioration in quality, and it will keep them in storage at the market under the most perfect conditions until the consumer wants them. The municipal authorities may exercise here a control over the methods of buying and selling sufficient to counteract violent fluctuations in price and unjust price fixing. The effect of collecting the food supply for a section of the city in one place will be to enable the city authorities to inspect the goods thoroughly, and to prevent in- jurious food stuffs from being introduced into the market or sold there. The Depart- ment of Markets can enact rules forbidding the sale of impure foods in the markets, in the same way that the United States Government forbids improper use of the mails. The effect of this protection of the food supply of the city would be very beneficial. Location The proposed market occupies two parcels of land. One, with an area of about 18.5 acres, has, roughly, the shape of a very flat triangle. Its broad base extends along Exterior Street, which is the marginal street along the Harlem River, from the 149th Street bridge to the 151st Street bridge ; its northerly side is formed by ISlst Street, which is parallel with the tracks of the New York Central Railroad, running from Mott Haven to the Harlem River; and its easterly side is formed by River Avenue, from ISlst Street to the 149th Street bridge approach. This parcel is covered by the market railroad yard, by the power house, and by a group of buildings. The other parcel covers 9.75 acres, and is bounded by River Avenue, ISlst Street, Walton Avenue, and 149th Street, and is covered by another group of buildings. Two slips on the Harlem River, at the foot of ISlst Street will accommodate vessels bringing foodstuffs to market. The goods can be quickly unloaded to the sheds on the adjacent piers for immediate sale or for storage, or they may be removed to the market building for cold or other storage by trolley cars, which run from the pier sheds into the market buildings. Industrial Railroad The proposed industrial railroad along the Harlem waterfront will pass by the market. As this railroad will serve to connect the Pennsylvania-Long Island-New Haven system with the New York Central system, as well as with the Bronx terminals so of the Jersey Central, Lehigh Valley and other lines, all the railroads which now supply New York with fpodstuflfs will be brought not only to the very doors of the market, but into the basements of the market buildings themselves, Central Station The situation of the market is central. Although located in The Bronx, it is not exclusively a Bronx market. The Harlem River bridges on the south, and the 161st Street and Washington bridges on the north, lead into broad avenues with light grades, which bring the market within easy reach of the whole of Manhattan Borough above 110th Street, a section of the City which is at present singularly unprovided with market facilities of any importance. Besides serving The Bronx and upper Manhattan, the market will also serve as a base of supplies for Mt. Vernon, New Rochelle, and a part of Yonkers. It has been laid out on lines broad enough to supply the needs of a population which, according to the estimates of competent authorities, will be in -excess of 3,000,000 in 1940. Ground or Track Level The ground or track level of the market is designed to act as a veritable through freight yard on the industrial railway. Experience in foreign cities, as well as a study of the peculiar needs of the market and of the character of the industrial railway, have shown that this is the only method of track arrangement which will satisfy the requirements. This level has therefore been divided into : (1) A general freight yard of 6.55 acres, to be used for storing and switching cars, and for unloading directly from cars to trucks or drays, or vice versa; (2) A section under one of the groups of buildings where the cars are brought alongside of broad unloading platforms of ample capacity. Broad driveways between these platforms will enable wagons to remove so much of the goods as is not intended to be stored in the building above. Elevators and stairways are provided for trans- ferring goods from these platforms to the floors above for sale or for cold or other storage. (3) A section under the other group of buildings where the tracks run along platforms which cannot be reached directly by wagons, but from which numerous elevators can remove the goods rapidly to the upper floors. The floors on the street level of the buildings in this group are devoted to stalls where goods may be exposed for sale, and where buyer and seller can come together, sample the goods, and buy in smaller quantities than would probably be handled in the other buildings, which are devoted to the handling of goods sent on consignment. The Railroad Yard The railroad yard is spanned by the power plant, which will supply all the buildings with refrigeration, and with heat and light. That part of Exterior Street which runs from the approach to the 149th Street bridge to the Jerome Avenue bridge will be carried on a viaduct. The lower or track and pier level will be reached from the streets above by four ramps, or inclined approaches on easy grades, which are so located as to separate, where possible, the opposing currents of traffic. Experience in other cities has shown that these currents are always heavy, and that they result in intolerable congestion unless properly regulated. Only trucks engaged in market traffic will have to cross the railroad tracks at grade, and this at well guarded crossings, not over the main tracks. • The general street traffic from the bridges and from the adjacent streets, as well /^»^"^ ^ P-R.OPO,SED /^UMIC1PALJ /ItW YOR.K. crTY PLAM " ^TtEET, LtVEL. ^ AR.K.tT 51 as the general market traffic, will be exposed neither to the delays nor to the dangers incident to railroad crossings at grade. On this level will also be unloaded, and to a large extent probably sold, all the market goods brought in by boat. Products arriving by farm-wagon can also find accommodation on this level. Upper or Street Level The upper or street level shows the power plant, which spans the railroad yard from River Avenue to the Exterior Street viaduct; the group of buildings west of River Avenue, bounded by River Avenue, 151st Street, Exterior Street, and the rail- road yard to the south; and the other group of buildings, east of River Avenue, bounded by River Avenue, ISlst Street, Walton Avenue, and 149th Street. In the buildings of the first group are handled foodstuffs sent on consignment, whether such stuffs require storing or not. The unloading platforms on the track level, which have an area of 149,000 square feet, and the broad driveways between them, which permit the simultaneous loading of 625 trucks, facilitate the removal of goods in large quantities with the least amount of handling. On the street level the buildings are separated by driveways, where trucks can be loaded without obstructing the general street traffic. At the northerly end of this group is the administration building. It contains, besides the administration and other offices, an auction room, covering 144,000 square feet. No provision has been made in this group of buildings for stalls, stands, etc., for small trade. Should these be found necessary they can be easily provided. Experience in other large cities has demonstrated the wisdom of permitting the minuter details to be shaped by the market conditions, which are constantly varying in response to the changes in business methods, transportation and marketing methods, etc. Other Group of Buildings The other group of buildings is devoted to stuffs which are to be sold to open market buyers or to consumers, who will inspect and sample the goods, and will generally buy in smaller quantities. It consists of nine buildings, four stories high above the street level. As in the other group, driveways provide easy access for wagons to all the buildings without obstructing the general traffic. The street floor level of each of these buildings is divided into stores or stalls and stands where goods may be exposed for sale and for sampling. The upper floors are devoted to cold and other storage goods, and may possibly be used later for further extending the number of stalls. Numerous elevators con- nect the platforms on the railroad level with the floors above, but no goods can be unloaded to trucks directly on the track level of this building. The platforms and elevators are so laid out in both groups of buildings, that goods from any car can be easily brought to any building above with the least amount of handling. Numerous light shafts provide proper ventilation and lighting on all floors. 410 Cars Can Be Unloaded at Once The number of cars that can be unloaded at the same time in the proposed market is 410. As the commodities will have to be unloaded practically at the same time, if the present method of sending goods to market can be used as a criterion, it will be seen that the trackage facilities are none too great. Further accommodations may, how- ever, be provided on the piers and by improved methods of shipping and handling. 52 The platform areas available adjacent to the railroad tracks are: In the first group of buildings, 149,000 square feet; jn the second group, 352,000 square feet. After allowance has been made for the space that must be left unobstructed, the platform area remaining is about twice as great as that of the maximum daily number of cars which are expected to arrive in 1940. While ample, this is not excessive, for goods are never stacked so compactly on the platforms as in the cars, and interruptions to traffic or congestion on the tracks must be guarded against by insuring the removal of goods as soon as they arrive, without regard to the subsequent disposition made of these goods. These platforms act as regulating reservoirs— they take care of the daily fluctuations in the arrival and departure of goods, which must be made independent of one another in order to insure the most efficient utilization of the limited trackage facilities. The Selling Space The selling space provided on the street level in the second group of buildings is 279,850 square feet, or about 1,500 square feet per carload per maximum day in 1913, and 620 square feet per carload per maximum day in 1940. These areas, when tested by the experience with selling space in markets of foreign cities, are none too great. They would, in fact, be too small were there not a possibility of extending the market over the railroad yard, piers, etc., and to the upper floors of the buildings. The gross storage space in both groups of buildings is 1,690,000 square feet. Estimates of the quantities of commodities that have to be carried over from season to season, and of the height to which they can be stacked in the storeroom, show that by 1940 the capacity of the market will be more than fully utilized. Q)ncentrating Power Experience in other cities has shown that the concentrating power of a central wholesale market is so intense that all who can avail themselves of the storage space will do so at the earliest possible moment. Hence all the space provided in the market is sure of occupancy soon after the erection of the market. Further expansion may be provided for by making the foundation of the structures capable of bearing additional stories when required. The spaces over the piers and over the railroad yard, which are now left uncovered, provide room for further' expansion. The necessity for the market, however, can be proved neither by the perfection of its architectural or of its engineering features alone, nor by the excellence of its location alone. These are but elements which contribute to its power of reducing the price of foodstuffs to consumers, which is the only criterion for judging of the necessity of the market. Estimated Cost Near $10,000,000 It is estimated that the entire market structure will cost $7,850,000. This does not include the Exterior Street viaduct or the actual track laying, elements which are not properly chargeable to the market. The ground will cost $2,000,000. A yearly rental of 35 cents per square foot of 1,970,000 square feet available for renting in the building alone will return 7 per cent, on the entire investment. This is more than is required to cover the fixed charges of interest and sinking fund, the charges for depreciation and repairs, and also the tax on the value of the ground. EUlin.-i'G-A z.uiLri/i^."ji' ftRM(* UNLOAPI.-H.; ■ntucKJ Ta »i Lo*e lot^-.j - ;-i;,j.v' . J L : S3 The Economies The market, with its sales agents, will automatically perform the centralizing function which is now performed by the market agents and collectors, and, to a limited extent, by the various growers' organizations. This should eliminate, say, from 3 per cent, to 5 per cent, of the present retail price of goods. The cost of repeated handling, after the goods reach the City, will be largely reduced by the proximity of the storage houses to. the cars and boats. The cost of storage will be reduced by the centralization of the mechanical and refrigerating facilities. The cost of insurance will be reduced by the modern structures. The losses now incident to the unavoidable exposure of goods, careless handling, loss of time and energy in obtaining the several articles of food from widely scattered places will surely be eliminated. Market Is Not to Produce Revenue It is not the purpose of the market system that it shall be used to produce revenue which may be spent on other phases of the City's activities — i. e., to be used as a means of indirect taxation. If the demand for space in the market exceeds the supply, so that the market is surrounded by stores which bring in higher rentals than those in the market, then the market occupants will be deriving a special benefit which, ac- cording to rigid economic laws, they will not voluntarily share with the public. In that case the rents should be raised, or, possibly, some means of price regulation devised. To prevent the possibility of such a condition arising the market has been planned on a sufficiently large scale to accommodate all the trade at that point for many years to come. The income then should be enough only to cover expenses, for there is no more equitable way of benefiting the members of the community than to let them enjoy the results of their own economy directly. Estimates of Space Needed in the Market The exact amount of trade that will seek space in such a market it is difficult to predict. We assume, however, that in a few years the market will be the main receiving and distributing place for the food supplies of the people of Manhattan above 110th Street and of The Bronx, and that the following figures form a fair basis for an approximate estimate of the size of the market needed. An analysis of the amount of food products brought to this city in 1911 by one railroad indicates the average loads per car to be : Tons 1. Flour 18.9 2. Canned Goods 20. 2 3. Butter 12. *4. Eggs 11.1 5. Meats, etc 14. 6. Lard 12.8 7. Green Fruit 11.3 8. Condensed Milk 18.5 9. Poultry 10. 10. Dried Beans 13.1 11. Green Vegetables 10. 12. Dried Fruit 17.9 13. Popcorn 26.6 14. Nuts 10.5 15. Crackers 12.6 16. Cheese 9.3 17. Cereals IS.l 18. Tea 12 .5 19. Watermelons 13.9 20. Salt 17.5 *420 crates of 3o dozen per car. 54 These averages, applied to the estimates of consumption of food in the city given by the Committee on Markets, Prices and Costs of the New York State Food In- vestigating Commission, indicate that the total consumption of these foodstuffs in the city by tons and carloads is approximately as follows: Tons Carloads Meat 440,000 31,400 Butter 69,500 5,792 Eggs 4,700,000 (crates 11,200 of 30 doz.) Flour 450,000 23,750 Poultry (dressed) 50,000 5,000 Potatoes 375,000 31,200 Vegetables and Fruit 29,638* Cheese 14,500 1,560 Cereals 35,000 2,300 Canned Goods 625,000 31,000 Sugar 200,000 — Distributed independently to great extent. Coffee 22,500 — Distributed independently to great extent. Fish 75,000 — ^Arrives by water mainly. * Appromnate. Much of the fruit and vegetables are brought by ship. On the basis of the foregoing figures and the distribution of population in the city the following table gives a close estimate of the car-lot business that will come into the market. Some commodities that will probably come to the market by rail and others that will come by boat are not included. ss ooooo OOOOO O ^ o •{— 2e°cc!Ooooo o o o ; o_o_o^o^o_q^o o o o o ^ o O (D • 2 ooooaoooo ^ cT o" ol OOOOOOOOOOO ^o t^ 1-t o cs_iM_^o_o^o_o t~:,o^o o o\ cs o lo i>^t-^r^'"orcrc^(^Tjr o~ < •ooooooooo o o o cii ■< ■ooooooooo o o o ^ Z ro • o_o o o ooooo ! ! o'"o'~o"o''o'"o~o''o''o' o_^ o" 1/5 oT § i o o\ .ooooooooo o s Os s rH . CN^oo^vo cs o^ o ^^l CO CD ui o" c^ ^ ^ 'r:!'^ "^ "-I t^ 00 ■3 o\ . lO »r> O O O O CO o o CO ■^ *•* ■»-H . 'O^'-^^O O O O VO o o ■* o__ » 1 p« • oo'"io~iWo''io"o'~-*'~io~o'' CO~ . tH r-l ? •UT^'ijtCS-rt >o 0\ CO • 4^ CO 4^ •s 2 ooooooo-*oo ■* O Tji 1 p3 **-" -u 2 OSOOOOCSOCO ooo CO o S o -g oj nl 0} o c o' m 5 'd o t3 ™ m 3 "C ^ C 2 •oooooor-oo t^ CN 00 1 c 2 -coioOO^OOOvO 0\ (M ^ o i H to CO Q ON c L 3^ • t^ CO »-l lO CO ON -^ o \o 5 ; ^fO't^rTn'oToo' to" oo" CO ^-1 CN ^ X! T H ^ o i-l 3 'OOOOOOiOOO CO to 00 s 3 -OOOOOOOOiO lO O 00 t H g O CO OS 3_ • '^Ov^'^.,'^_'-l.«~-.,-* « «^ 3* ; TH'cs'vd"'-H"od"f^ -^ ■* co" CO T-* T- -1 g c< ■5^ : 1 g > .^(MOOOOOOOOO o T(< lO ^ lU > .QONOIOOOCOVOOO ■* O CS ■M^ CO t ■Sb'~:,"^„'~:,R,'^„^'^^*'?, o Tf «^ n +3 ,*5 OS c r a io^'-rco'»o^^orrH'c*f oo" oT O i ' ba T-t «N CO cs ^ CN s; o ir 1 0) • tn III . wi 3 , 2 tf) J s •J3 1 g 1 m o s '■■B tS IS ■d-o MM •S.S CJ 1— i § II 0} ' i o o ^ ■ 3 II 1 ^ 1 a o : fe : Saw 1 ■+J -*^ +j Sj TO (U t^ ^ ^ B 1 -9(< t^ ft pqpqW fo Ph Ph fe o o o <<: JCCi6y^M-j0ny/'r-A!yrC ■/^o/rr^ ^'fe/f IV. BRIEF AND PLANS FOR A NEW WEST WASHINGTON AND GANSE- VOORT MARKET Submitted to Market Commission of the City of New York by Committee repre- senting Gansevoort Market Business Men's Association, West Washington Market Association, Chelsea Association of Merchants and Manufacturers, Greenwich Village Public Service Committee. New York, N. Y., May 20, 1912. To the Hon. Cyrus C. Miller, Chairman of the Market Commission appointed by His Honor, Mayor Gaynor, of the City of New York. Sir: — The Legislature of this State at its last session passed legislation providing the Sinking Fund Commission of this city with authority to permit the use of the present sites of West Washington Market and Gansevoort Market for dock purposes, upon condition that it first establish suitable quarters for these markets elsewhere in the Ninth Ward of the Borough of Manhattan. Complying with your invitation to make suggestions for such new markets, we beg to submit herewith our ideas in the form of plans : General Plan The accompanying plans propose that there shall be acquired land as . follows : The triangular block bounded by Little West 12th Street, Washington, Greenwich and Gansevoort Streets Assessed Valuation $522,500 The block bounded by Gansevoort, Washington, Greenwich and Horatio .Streets Assessed Valuation 526,500 The block bounded by Horatio, Washington, Green- wich and Jane Streets Assessed Valuation 527,000 The block bounded by Jane, Washington, Greenwich and West 12th Streets Assessed Valuation 537,500 The block bounded by West 12th Street, Washing- ton, Greenwich and Bethune Streets Assessed Valuation 430,500 The block bounded by West 12th Street, West Street, Washington and Bethune Streets Assessed Valuation 575,500 A strip approximately seventy feet wide on the west side of Washington Street from Gansevoort Street to West 12th Street Assessed Valuation 301,500 Total Assessed Valuation $3,421,000 Plate I shows the location of this land in relation to contiguous property, and tracking connections with a proposed elevated railway on the marginal way. Plate s shows a cross section looking north. The plan includes three buildings running longitudinally from the south side of 58 Little West 12th Street to the north side of Bethune Street, each 80 feet in width and 920 feet in length, and one building on the west side of Washington Street run- ning from a point in the open square about 66 feet north of Gansevoort Street to the south side of West 12th Street, 60 feet in width and 760 feet in length. These building will be termed — for convenience — East Building, East Center Building, West Center Building, and West Building. Two new market streets 60 feet wide are created running north and south between, and generally parallel to, Washington and Greenwich Streets, which will be called, for convenience, West Terminal Street and East Terminal Street. Four elevated tracks will traverse the terminal on Washington Street; four on West Terminal Street and two on Greenwich Street. These tracks will be about 4 feet below the Terminal Floor, bringing that floor on a level with the floor of the car. The trackage in the Market terminal proper will accommodate at one time 270 cars and ISO cars may be placed at one time alongside of platforms and be unloaded simul- taneously. Thus there is railroad trackage at all times for an equal number of cars waiting to be unloaded, as are unloading, with the result of a minimum of switching time required, to obtain continuously the full capacity of the terminal. The track connections with the main line are shown to the south of the Market, avoiding blockage and materially aiding the obtaining of the terminal's full capacity. On the block bounded by West 12th Street, Washington Street, West Street, and Bethune Street is an ell building which will be termed for convenience the South Building, the two first floors of which are to be occupied by the Live Poultry Trade. This building runs east and west and is 140 feet in width and 366 feet in length. On the ground floor the building is divided by a new street 40 feet in width, which will be called, for convenience, South Terminal Street. Four independent spurs of tracks from the main line are proposed to be run to this building, one each on West 12th and Bethune Streets and two on South Terminal Street. These spurs will accommodate at one time 30 cars. Gansevoort, Horatio, Jane, and West 12th Streets, present city streets running transversely through the Market, will remain open thoroughfares and of their present widths. Washington Street will be widened 14 feet, Greenwich Street 2S feet and Bethune Street 40 feet over their present widths. Plan of Buildings It is proposed to excavate that part of the land from the west side of Washington Street to the west side of Greenwich Street, and from about 60 feet north of Ganse- voort Street to the north side of Bethune Street, forming the Basement of the main structures. A portion of this basement will be used for the Farmers' Market, now occupying the open square; in this part the walks and driveways are so arranged as to permit the farmers to deliver their garden products direct from their trucks to the purchaser. The other portion of the basement is to be used for the loading of trucks with the incoming food products from the unloading platforms above, and for the unload- ing of trucks bringing outbound freight. In this part will be two delivery platforms surrounded by driveways, permitting 275 trucks to back up and load at the same time. Two entrance driveways are provided with 5 per cent, grade and two exit driveways of Ayi per cent, and 5 per cent, grades, respectively. The basement will have a head- room of 14 feet and will contain approximately 425,000 square feet of floor space. The proposed Grade Floor consists of stalls and stores laid out in units of 20 feet by 20 feet. A dealer may occupy as many units as he desires to pay for. The Second Floor immediately under the Terminal floor will be rented in conjunction with the grade floor and will be occupied by the offices and refrigerators and lofts C//s/sr^ /?s^ac/^z/^yv ^/'M'/fey^/7/yT^ dfMfy/iz/WC rcz/f^/i'S. Q/i>/r£^//Ar/c^ p^/z/.:^cs /^^/3y./c >S^/Fy/r^ Co/>7/^/Tr^£: ao'^'' ^e^ ^ 15^" D>ri^' f^^rVTyvr-^^ 5rG/?fl^^-i ^1 1 iTTfi' ffl ^//yef-Qo/err TtO/\ • a /^A/.'\?/\\- ^/7J/z'^//7 T^Z ~t**i 2*?^J «??^ S^^J, Z\ m^ t\.» »' i r /^■jr 7k/?/yw^i -^^ -mm /*J/'>T/V£7 ^^ <^X ^^^^ A Zn c '.N A -^ A A *^ + :^ 4= "ii * 1 C/?S£/v»\c^ -4 6o X so' ^ /=^l-^T£//^^ C/ro33 9/yT^ ^M7//£//='/pc n/zf^/i's. Q/f'^£'///r/c:^ P^/zz^(77/>7/Tr^f. HdR^ "Tint T~i~rT I^^J////YC7 o r *^77 r *H ^ Tt-^?/^^ ^2/1 =1 n. r =P= ^y9jA Vf7 'P/W- ip/J <^ C'/''.7rt^frf Iti G B S^^J. ^, ^u» .. -yb i ^ ^ h u^ ■ y; ' y.~ ifis F^ 1 r I I /f^jr 7£/?/yh y/9i. Sz /v/'/T/tvsT — y-' ~7Z^- M/A/Jtl H^..a. H {//lfLOA)^/A/(^ / ' 'CATrOT. i eo ao 4^ "If ^- eo 2?/^/. ;g i r//o,7«. /J^7/C ©^'^ C^£e/vM^c/Y ■* ■St: 4o X so' -^ C/703^ O\O\O\ On vH t^ ^H 0\ 00 00 0000»OIOIO>0»010 00OnO\O\OnO\0nOnOnOnO\ CO ^-H ^-H »H *-( 11 ft II i" CO fli (0 o 43 ^ ■a s CS -^ 1-H i-( 1-t ■^8,5 2^ is Pi ^11 CO p, •^ CS CS CNI CS T CO CO C^l CS ^H ^H •sanji o^CJ) JO il^pui pne jaqnm^ ^ \ci o sf>\5«^ ^ ^ ^ ON "-N^ w\i-i\0\ 00 o\ 00 I QNooopop I III, 00 I I I I CO CO (N CN 'qjtio xpes Suoie ao^ds SntpBo^n. 33 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 I •o •SqJTlO tI99Ji^9a lO -^ "^ CO PO PQ PO ■S9ini gsnoii nag^^sg; 200 These goods, packed in full boxes, would weigh only slightly less, but packed in barrels, due to the lost space between the barrels, their weight per cubic foot of space occupied would be 31 pounds. Table No. 1, of Report of the Committee on Markets, Prices, and Costs of the New York State Food Investigating Committee, while not necessarily accepted as correct, will serve again as a basis for computation. Translating the figures there given into pounds avoirdupois and thence into cubic feet at the rate of 31 pounds per cubic foot, corresponding to average barrelled foodstuffs and omitting milk, which probably would not come into market in market times, the total equals, cubic feet per year or, assuming 300 market days per year, 599,800 cubic feet per market day. As will be seen from the table of capacities of streets through one 90-foot street, this whole quantity of foodstuffs could probably be carted in one hour. There is thus, so far as the mere vehicular approaches are concerned, no reason why a single wholesale market for the whole city should not be planned. The standing space required in a single market for the whole number of retailers who might be there at once would, however, be excessive. If, of the 11,000 retailers and at least 4,000 more fruit and vegetable dealers and peddlers who come to market between 4.30 a. m. and 8 a. m., and who spend on an average one and one-half hours there, not all, but perhaps two-thirds of whom come daily and the other third once in two days, there is at one time in the market, say 40 per cent. There must be, then, standing room for 6,000 retailers' 'vehicles which, at as little as 148 square feet per vehicle would require slightly over 20 acres, an amount of wagon space, even if on two or three different levels, difficult to secure at any centrally located place in this city. As has been shown under heading of the Retailer, unless the retailers supply themselves with means which they do not now possess for the cool or cold storage of "most perishable" goods, most of them must have a delivery of goods which, in point of speed and certainty, is beyond what can be expected of a hired delivery service. These retailers must therefore continue to go to market in their wagons, and there must be room in the market to accommodate these wagons. When the distance (one way) from market to store exceeds 5 to 6 miles, which distance can be traveled in about one and one-half hours, it becomes burdensome and the retailer seeks other marketing means. Considering that the distances from a central point on the west side of lower Manhattan to the various limits of the City, measured along air lines, are about as follows : To the north, 14 miles; to the northeast, to the east, IS miles; to the southeast (Coney Island), 9}4 miles; to the southwest (Totteriville), 19 miles. It should be clear that a central wholesale market cannot, and will not, supply a large portion of the retailers directly. Where retailers cannot get to market conveniently, they have to make other buy- ing arrangements, resulting in their having to pay more than market prices, all of which makes foodstuff costs to the outlying city dweller very high. It is possible by the use of motor trucks and of automobile delivery wagons to reduce the time between market and store sufficiently to make one central market practical for these vehicles, and it is possible by the use of only motor trucks in market, each truck serving at least three retailers and each truck having three times the carrying capacity of the ordinary retailer's wagon and occupying only the same space as this wagon and horse, to reduce the standing room required in market for such motor trucks about 7 acres; but, even if this were supplied on three floors, the ground area required for one central market would be almost prohibitively large. The cost of delays to trucks in loading will depend, of course, on the total per 201 diem costs for the trucks and drivers; the percentage of cost added to the goods onto this, and also on the value of these goods. Thus, if a two-horse truck costing $7 per day has to wait three hours, equal to one-third of its working day, for a load of two tons of cabbage worth $5 per ton, there is added to this cabbage 23 per cent, of its value for a mere waiting charge, without the cost of transportation. The same truck, waiting the same time for a load of oranges, would probably not cause an addition of more than V/z per cent. And for potatoes this waiting would add a charge of about 5 per cent. Summary and Conclusions. — (In what follows, an acquaintance with the deduc- tions of the foregoing is presupposed. Most of the statements here made as such are repetitions of conclusions reached in the preceding somewhat extended discussion.) Conditions are such in this city that a larger supply of foodstuffs of better quality and at lower prices are even now badly needed, and the demand is increasing. To obtain the greater supply and the better quality, the producer will have to receive a greater net profit. To lower the price to the consumer, in the face of this demand for more profit for the producer, it is necessary to do two things : (a) Eliminate the very great uncertainties under which the producer now works. (b) Eliminate considerable of the expense between producer and consumer which is necessary under existing conditions of marketing. The producer's proper work is growing foodstuffs and, undoubtedly, he can best serve the world when he is free to give this, his work, his undistracted attention. He should be provided with information as to what to grow so as to best serve the world, which information he cannot collect for himself. He should be advised as to what consuming center to ship his goods to when they are harvested, so as to help to properly average the supply. He should have clear advice as to how to grade, pack, and ship, so that culls and waste stay with him where they can be of use, rather than go to a market where they breed for him only expense and reciprocal suspicions of dishonesty. And finally, he should have available to ship to a market so constituted that he will have perfect confidence that his goods, when received there, will be handled as economically, as judiciously, and as honestly as he himself, in his best moments, could do. Having this, he will be enabled to make much more total net profits than he can at present, although his goods will be selling at a lower price wholesale; and, in addition, he will be enabled to safely ship large volumes of goods which, when the to be expected gross profit is small, he now lets go to waste, unshipped, rather than take the chance of more loss. Producers, through their Associations, have in various parts of the country at- tempted to do many of these things and with varying degrees of success. Their work is in all cases of value, and in some functions their labors will probably be found advisable to be continued. In other directions, particularly in the gathering of information as to what to grow, and in the giving of advice as to where to ship, there are so many unassociated producers that it seems possible that the past work of the Associations will be of most value in having prepared the minds of the pro- ducers for what otherwise would, a few years ago, have been considered a clear infringement of the producers' constitutional rights. This problem of supplying the producers with information as to what to plant is closely associated with the later problem of advising them where to market. Both problems are more than county-wide, more than state-wide — they are at least nation- wide, and to some, but fortunately a small extent, international. The Producers' Associations have so far failed to coordinate with one another suffi- ciently to cope with these problems. And there are other matters of valuable in- formation which these associations are entirely unprepared to furnish, such as ade- 202 quate long time weather forecasts, which the U. S. Department of Agriculture can furnish. The U. S. Department of Agriculture is about to establish a Bureau of Markets. So far as known, its scope and powers have not yet been formulated. It is possible that the matters of information to producers above stated have been provided for by that Bureau; but, at any rate, it could do no harm if the De- partment were properly urged to include these matters in its field. The standards by which foodstuffs are to be graded, as to size, color, shape, quality, etc., and packed, the size, shape, and quality of the packages, the conditions under which goods are to be received at market, etc., are all matters which can be regulated by action of the authorities of the market in each consuming center; but it should be plainly evident that if wise standards, defining particularly and exactly all these things, were adopted by some central authority, -that the producer would thereby be enabled to grade and pack his goods once for all and ship all or part to any market, diverting them en route if need be. Proper standards and a proper inspection service to enforce these standards and to unbiasedly report on the condition of goods as received would mean for any market adopting these measures a large preference on the part of shippers over markets otherwise equal but not so equipped. The final word as to what constitutes wisdom in this matter will not be said for some considerable time to come. Mean- time, it is recommended that either a set of carefully considered standards for New York City Markets be adopted, or that such a set be, by the market authorities in New York City, proposed and urged upon the Bureau of Markets of the Depart- ment of Agriculture for their consideration as a step toward national legislation covering this matter. The expense between producer and consumer has been shown to be largely, not in the wholesale marketing, but in the retailing. And the reason for this has been shown to be that the retailer sells the consumer not foodstuffs alone, but foodstuffs plus services of various sorts, plus a share in various expenses. It has been shown that there are many consumers who wish these services and do not object to paying for them, but that there are others to whom this having to pay for services which they would gladly perform themselves if thereby they could save expense is a real hardship. It has further been pointed out that if the retailer •■ did not have to include the costs of services in the prices charged for foodstuffs that he could secure for himself a better profit. Perhaps the charges for such services as delivery, the gathering of orders by wagons, and phone use, which the consumer may or may not elect to receive, should be charged for separately so that those who do not receive need not pay. This would be an economically sound treatment, tending to check a growing extravagance of often quite useless expense. There are other expenses which the consumer can avoid by a wise ordering of his ways. If paying cash will avoid dealing at a credit store, he will avoid helping to finance others' improvidence; and more expensive still, helping to pay for goods which others have used. If he will buy closely; buy in quantity so far as is wise for him to do; buy standard goods instead of highly advertised preparations, and buy at stores which he can see are economically run, instead of at extravagantly operated ones. A comparison made by experts of all the different preparations of the various foodstuffs, with their comparative virtues and values given in such form that the ordinary consumer would have correct and practical guidance therefrom, would cer- tainly tend to reduce to the consumer the cost of the advertised preparations of foodstuffs. To be of value the preparations must be given by the name or mark which the consumer will see when the goods are offered him for sale. This is a big piece of 203 work in itself, and when done a great deal of it would be of much more than local interest. It will not be easy to do this without incurring damage suits from certain manufacturers, unless a considerable number of manufacturers of preparations of each article agree to permit comparisons, analyses, etc., of their goods, as bought in the open market to be published. If such a partial list be published, and means be taken to bring these into the consumers' hands, the outstanding manufacturers will gradually be forced into line. Such a set of comparisons, properly made, will benefit the manufacturer in the long run, relieving him of much of his heavy advertising burden and making success lie in the direction of easily ascertainable merit rather than along the somewhat mysterious paths of fancy and prejudice. Eternal vigilance as the price of liberty applies not only to freedom from political oppression but to freedom from all kinds of wrongs. The producer who would keep even the best planned market organization free from graft must arrange to so inspect the service rendered by his agents that wrongdoing will be too hazardous to be profitable. Right service must be rewarded and honored, and wrong service made unprofitable, or graft will flourish. In this, the Producers' Associations can operate to greatly reduce to the producer the cost of such inspection while operating with much more force to procure the punishment of the offender. As a means of making this eternal vigilance possible to the consumer as against the retailer, semi- wholesale markets adjacent to the railroad termini would be of great importance. It is doubtful that a right-minded public begrudges the efficient retailer his profits ; but this public should, even if it does not, begrudge the retailer the power to assess upon them, at his pleasure, the results of economic shortsighted- ness and mismanagement. The retailers have their organizations in which to some extent marketing and retailing problems are discussed. They are well enough organized to successfully impose a heavy fine upon the wholesaler who sells a consumer. They are therefore presumably sufficiently organized to deal with the problems of separating service charges from foodstuff costs; with the advisability of cool or cold storage equipment in their stores ; with the adoption of means to eliminate the purchaser on credit, or at least the purchaser who fails to pay. That they have not so far successfully done so is believed to be more because of the desirability of such actions not having been presented to them in a convincing way than of a lack of power or ability on their part to cope with these problems. The Market Itself. — The most important part of the market is not the buildings nor the location, nor even facilities, but the organization. Given a proper organization, good results will be obtained in spite of poor build- ings, locations, or facilities. The necessary functions of any market were outlined at the beginning of this report. Without a market organization planned to direct and govern these various func- tions, disconnected markets or even different parts of the same market, if of large extent, must really be separate markets, offering different attractions to their patrons and therefore not serving in the most efficient manner to distribute the foodstuffs. Because of transportation costs and of the hardships imposed upon the retailer by the distances, the verdict of the past that more than a certain small distance from store to market is impassable, seems properly final. This, coupled with the difficulty of securing sufficient ground space in a near central water front location, would seem to make undesirable the scheme of one central wholesale market for the whole of Greater New York. The markets should be so placed as to require little over S miles, and certainly not over 7^2 miles in any direction to the limits of the territory served by them. The location on the water front is desirable mainly for the steamboats, canal 204 boats, fishing boats, and smaller craft which are thus enabled to unload at market. Steamships running in lines have their own piers and generally carry quantities of such size as require distributing among several markets. Railroad facilities are of much greater importance than are water front facilities. The railroad entering the market should be a connecting railroad, so as to give the market the advantages of all of the railroads so connected. If this connecting railroad have connection with the piers of the main foodstuff-carrjring steamship lines, the markets' facilities will be greatly increased. There are at present seventeen usual railroad delivery points for foodstuffs within Greater New York, not counting the Borough of Rich- mond. All of these are used at times, most of them constantly. Many are not near markets, but carloads are sold, subject to inspection, when delivered at these delivery points. Perhaps the most important two matters to be covered in the adoption of an organization for a market are the means for standardization of the goods and the means for the determination of the market price of each commodity. Many of the advantages of sufficient ' standards covering gradings of any food- stuff by variety, size, color, taste, and other qualities affecting retailer and consumer have been already dwelt upon. Coupled with an efficient and uniform inspection service by the market authorities, who finally should control the application of these market standards, the producer, the shipper, the receiver, the retailer, and even the consumer are all assured of a square deal. It means introducing at one swoop, order and honesty throughout the whole path of the foodstuffs from the field to the kitchen.. It means trust instead of suspicion, and to large degree that faith on the part of the necessarily absent producer which will induce him to ship close margined food- stuffs to market. It means a great reduction of the time and effort now spent in market by retailers and dealers in examining and sorting over goods, and it means that the goods on sale in a market need not all be exposed in the sales hall, thus making for a much more compact, and therefore in some other functions more efficient, market. It seems proper to this control of standards that no goods should be placed on sale in the markets which have not been graded and packed in accordance with market standards and which have not been inspected by the markets' inspectors as to these, and as to condition upon receipt. Reports by such market inspectors, properly supervised, should be satfsfactory evidence to the shipper, especially as the goods would be sold by these reports. The Determination of the Market Price of Any Article. — It has been pointed out herein that the market price of any article of foodstuff is subject to continuous variation throughout different parts and different times of the same market, as well as in different markets, and it has been pointed out that a great many of the retailers are mainly concerned to buy at as good a price as do their competitors. If it were possible to establish a uniform price throughout all the city markets for each day in each grade of each article, it would benefit the consumer by reducing the uncer- tainties of the producer, it would be nearly a substantial justice, and in addition would be of considerable benefit by permitting otherwise subordinated conveniences of the retailers to control their movements. It would be approximately just, as between centrally located and outlying city markets, both because the costs of transporting goods in quantity by eflScient means for these short distances is only a small per cent, of their value and because nearly every city market would be especially favored by being closest to the source of. supply of some one or more articles of foodstuffs. It has been pointed out that there are two methods of price fixing in quite common use, one by a process of offer and refusal or acceptance, in which all can take part, 205 the other by the action of experts who fix the prices by their knowledge of demand and supply. The prices as fixed by the experts can undoubtedly be the more logical and more nearly scientifically correct; but, on the other hand, if motives other than the highest secure control of the experts, the resulting bad condition may be very difficult to bring under proper control. The two methods are quite analogous to the democratic and monarchial types of government, with this possible difference — that, while in the case of governments the democratic government may not produce as good government as the well con- ducted monarchy, it is claimed to be better because producing better citizens — in this case, the ethical improvement of the marketmen is not the prime desideratum in this matter of market price determination. It is possible for the market authorities to determine quite closely how much of each variety of each article of foodstuffs, at certain prices, the city as a whole will absorb in any day in the year, of a given kind of weather and when certain supplies of other foodstuffs which are used as equivalents or substitutes for this variety are in market. Because, as has been pointed out, a considerable of the consumption of foodstuffs depends upon the price at which they can be bought; because a considerable of eating, especially of fruits and other of the more pleasing of foodstuffs is more a matter of pleasure than of necessity, the price will help to a large degree to determine the quantity which the market can absorb. The determination of the consumers' demand is therefore not a simple problem, but it is nevertheless as capable of exact de- termination as are many other complicated questions in engineering and by the same methods. It is also possible, if the market regulations require that all goods to be sold at wholesale must be formally entered for market and inspected the day previous to sale, to know the market's supply. It is also possible for the supply which the retailers have on hand to be estimated quite closely, and the estimate checked if need be by inspection. It is thus possible to know quite closely the supply available to the consumer and the consumer's demands. And this information, modified in some degree by a knowledge of the approximate total future supplies, should be sufficient to enable the market authorities to set a wholesale price for any variety of ^any article. A determination of this sort gives the producer or shipper no voice in the matter of market price determination, except such as he may indirectly have through refusing to enter his goods until the market is believed to be satisfactorily short of supplies. It could be arranged that the pror ducer or shipper could enter his goods to be sold only when the price exceeded a certain limit. This is practically all the voice the producer or shipper has at the present time, and this is sufficient to prevent such arbitrary action on the part of the market authorities as would wrong the producer. It will be seen that the producer's final act of control is in refusal to sell or to produce at unsatisfactory prices, the consumers' is in curtailment to a minimum of his buying. A determination of market price by experts of the market authorities could not then become so arbitrary as might at first glance seem possible. In the practice of certain retailers in outlying towns in securing their supplies from the producers who are on the way to market, paying therefore on the succeed- ing day the highest market price established for these goods on the day of their purchase, may be found ideas of value in formulating another system of market price determination. Here it will be noted first, that the convenience and saving of expense of not 206 having to go into market and haul thence the goods which were already passing through their town, is sufficient to cause the retailers to forego their possible oppor- tunity in market to buy at less than the highest market prices and to accept market prices established by others, rather than those which they helped to determine, and second, that the bargain, so far as its determination in absolute figures was concerned, was not completed until the day after the purchase and delivery of the goods. If it be desirable that, instead of market prices being determined by the experts of the market that their advice and information be used simply as such, but that the price be really fixed by the traders, it might be that the sales be all mainly pri- vate, for the facilitation of business, that the sale be made nominally at prices agreed upon between seller and buyer, which prices were really to be modified by the action of a market clearing-house to an average of all such private prices made during the market day for the same goods of each commodity, and that the pur- chasers deposit a certain per cent, of money in excess of their agreed upon private price to cover a possible higher average market price than their private price, the prices to be brought before the market clearing-house by properly worded declarations, without which no goods entered for the market might be removed therefrom. If the price of the goods to the purchaser was not to be affected by the price he reported, he would have a tendency to report prices higher than he actually paid, first to misinform his consuming customers, and second to induce his competitors to mark their goods higher when selling to their consumers. The wholesaler, if he owned the goods outright, would have a tendency to report higher prices than actually received from the retailer so as to delude other wholesalers. And the com- mission man would have a tendency to report prices as lower than actually received so as to secure the difference for himself. If, however, both buyer and seller had to sign (and even perhaps take some simple and quick yet binding affidavit, too) the statement of their private agreement, had to deposit the same with the market authorities before the goods could be taken from market, and finally, had to pay for their goods by the average market price which their written statements had helped determine, these statements would become of force and importance. A numerical average of the market prices reported would not be just as giving the purchaser of one bushel equal voice with the purchaser of a carload. The average for any one grade of a commodity should be the sum of the products of each quantity of goods, times its private price, all divided by the total quantity of the commodity of this grade so sold on the day in question in the market. This scheme of operation could, it is thought, be made practical, and would not cause as much delay to business as an attempt to auction off all goods, while giving the retailer and the producer a chance to know market prices quickly and exactly. Either of these market price determinations would be a considerable advance over the present methods. The latter of these two methods would probably require banking facilities whose hours would coincide with those of the market, and whose information and ex- perience would be such as to make them secure in lending upon produce in market storage, and furthermore whose interests would incline them, to so do. A system of market ownership of standard returnable packages, to be rented upon sufficient deposit and adequate rental, would much simplify the package problem, enabling the packages to be sent where and when needed and stored when not, all under a central control. This would very considerably reduce the present investment in packages, and by causing the purchase of more lasting packages by using these more continually and more carefully, the expense for packages which the consumer finally pays would be much reduced; and also because the cost of packages which is often a deterrent upon the shipping of low margined foodstuffs would be removed^ 207 this would aid to bring into market the desirable volume of these low priced food- stuffs. The Buildings. — To design a market proportionately throughout it is necessary to fix upon, mentally at least, some maximum capacity for this market, and to de- sign all parts for this capacity in accordance with the scheme of operation to be used. The market having been located in a certain district, with reference to the con- veniences of railroad and boat as well as street transportation, and the limits of the district which it will serve when this district is well populated having been marked by the distances through which goods can economically be carted, the number of retailers should be determined from an actual count of the number of retailers in an equal area of a similar type in a well built up portion of the city. The standing room in market for the wagons of these retailers, which is one of the big floor space factors, will to a considerable extent depend upon the market organization adopted. For, if the retailer can come at his convenience, early or late, and can buy quickly, without disparagement, fewer retailers will be in market at any one time and less standing room need therefore be provided. This standing room should be well lighted, well ventilated, and yet protected from strong drafts. It should afford, by wide gangways, easy access to the retailers' wagons so that the goods bought can be promptly and easily loaded at any time convenient to the retailer, and should have easy access at all times to the streets outside. If market standards and inspection are perfected to such a point that sales of all goods can be made by description and by sample, the sales halls can be very com- pact, resulting in quick and sharp trading. If few standards of much acceptance hold, as at present, the sales halls will probably, have to be spread out enough to exhibit all, or the big bulk of the goods entered for sale in the day's market. If the goods are entered the day before, inspected and listed by the market in- spectors, the goods need in many cases be handled but once, from car to retailer's wagon. If the goods are not sold by standard, but by inspection, as at present, so many grades are frequently mixed in a carload as to require regrading of the car in justice to the shipper and to the retailer. This means one additional rehandling, and requires room therefor and place to exhibit the regraded goods for sale. Most markets, because of their size and somewhat central location in the district they serve, will be approached from more than one direction. It will therefore, in general, be possible to have approaches arranged so that the standing room for the purchasers' vehicles can be on more than one level, thus economizing on the ground area required for the market. It seems probable that farmers will not much longer bring in produce by horse- drawn vehicles, but that the amounts brought in may increase, and that motor vehicles will be used for this purpose. Provision of stalls for farmers, if made, should there- fore be temporary, and should occupy a space intended for the future growth of some other market function. Lodging rooms for farmers, bathrooms, and restaurants should properly occupy those spaces, such as the upper stories of the buildings which are not required for the more important functions of the market. If possible, the sales halls should be all on one level and as compact as possible. Whether such a market will ever become a trading center for the big staples which are now dealt in upon the Produce Exchange is problematical — in fact, it is question- able that much advantage would lie in endeavoring to mix the purchasing problems of the manufacturers with those of the retailers. But, if such were done, it seems quite plain that, since the buyers would be a quite different set of people in the two cases, the sales halls should be separate and apart. Facilities should be provided, preferably between the market entrance and the 208 standing room of the vehicles, where returnable packages can be delivered by the retailers and credited. Provision should be made for the cold and cool storage of all but non-perishable articles which arrive to be placed on immediate sale. This should be arranged so that the goods from the time of their arrival at market until their departure can be so kept that deterioration will be reduced to a minimum. There should also be some provision for the cool or cold storage of goods which are to be held for distribution throughout the year. Storage of this sort in the market will inevitably, because of the higher land rentals and of the higher costs of coal and labor, be more expensive than in storage houses located either in the producing centers or at railroad transfer points. But there should be provided enough such storage room to keep on hand a supply sufficient to tide over strikes and disasters of the usual maximum duration. Goods perfectly well graded and packed can, for very temporary storage until placed on sale, and within the demurrage time allowed on the cars, at least, be kept on the car near the market. If these be refrigerator cars, ice will be required, and this the cold storage plant should be equipped to provide. But, if all goods be graded and packed in accordance with rigid market standards, trackage room in market will be needed only for perishable articles, and for such proportions of the less perishable articles as the smaller retailers carry back to their stores in their own wagons. The remainder of the less perishable articles could be delivered from that railroad delivery point nearest to the retailers' stores. It seems sufficient, therefore, if, in each market enough railroad trackage be provided to permit upwards of three-quarters of enough cars to be placed at one time, as below indicated, to contain all of the goods which that market at its maxi- mum is designed to sell in any one day. For the utmost dispatch in handling, it seems desirable that all unskilled persons, and all persons whose interest might lead them to pilfer, should be kept off the unloading floor or floors, and that the cars should be so placed and separated that goods can be trucked in any direction from any car to elevators or chutes leading to the retailers' wagons. So that if the scheme of market organization which will be used in the near future be decided upon, the design of the buildings and other facilities flows there- from easily and logically. It has herein been sought to show how much of the expense of foodstuffs to the consumer is caused by the present haphazard organization of our markets, and how little can be hoped in amelioration from mere facilities without adequate market organization. Appendix Quotation from "Freight Terminals and Trains," by Drocge, Page s "But, taking an average month, it is shpwn by the monthly statistics of the American Railway Association's Committee on Relations between Railroads that, in May, 1911, freight car performance was as follows: Mileage of roads reporting ^'223,680 Revenue (producing) freight cars owned [X2, 174,628 Per cent, of cars in shop 7 . 83 Freight car mileage 1,626,664,629 Average miles per car per day 23 . 7 Per cent, of loaded car mileage 67.4 Average ton mUes (revenue and non-revenue) per car mile (loaded and empty) 14.2 Average ton miles (revenue and non-revenue) per loaded car mile 21.2 Average ton miles (revenue and non-revenue) per car per day 338 209 Since the average speed of a freight train from terminal to terminal, including road delay, is from 10 to IS miles per hour, it is plain that 2 to 3 hours in a train will give a freight car the average mileage per day shown by the above statistics. This indicates that freight cars are in motion just about 10 per cent of the time." XIV. ABSTRACTS OF TESTIMONY TAKEN BY THE COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION J. D. REMINGTON, Special Agent of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company I am in the Freight Department of the railroad and am located at Grand Central Terminal. I have been in this position seven years. I supervise the handling of freight both coming to and going from the City of New York. The freight traffic manager has direct charge of the perishable goods coming into the New York Mar- ket. I know of the cars that are running, when they are coming and where they are going, and I assist in making the schedules to take care of the movement of them. If anyone has any complaint to enter as to manner in which they are handled, he naturally comes to me and I take it up with our operating department or our transportation department. Perishable goods come in on several stations : Barclay Street, Desbrosses Street, 33d Street, 60th Street, 130th Street, Melrose Junction — according to the commodity and the point at which the trade wants the goods. As a rule the shipper states the delivery, although the shipper is governed somewhat by the rules regulating delivery. We take certain commodities at certain stations. Barclay Street, for instance, is a pier station with no track delivery. Any freight that comes to Barclay Street must be moved there on car floats. This station takes apples, pears, quinces, garden roots, such as potatoes-^in packages, not in bulk — ^turnips, beets, onions, and that class of goods, which are unloaded on the pier. In the morning at seven o'clock the consignees sell them to the trade — retailers and others. No bulk goods are re- ceived there; they are all in packages. Desbrosses Street takes peaches, plums, celery, lettuce, and the highly perishable commodities, and makes during the season a night delivery of some where they want to take the goods to their stores to sell. The market people in New York, the Fruit and Produce Trade Association, of which nine-tenths of the commission men and wholesale dealers are members, have a Transportation Committee, which regu- lates to some extent the rules by which that business is handled. There is no market at Desbrosses Street, only on grapes. During the fall season when grapes are run- ning, they are sold on the pier or on the bulkhead to dealers, but there are no other commodities sold there. And all of the fruits and vegetables that are received on Barclay Street are not sold there. The receivers take them to their stores if they so desire. At Desbrosses Street there are no bonnets on the street — nothing but the pier. There is a marginal market in West Street, but it is never used. Those bon- nets or hoods in West Street are in front of Piers 27, 28, and 29, which are Pennsyl- vania piers, and in front of the Old Dominion Line Pier No. 26, and in front of the Baltimore and Ohio pier farther down toward Barclay Street. We have no hoods or bonnets in front of Barclay Street, which are Piers 16 and 17. The goods that come in at 33d Street are bulk goods as a rule — potatoes, turnips, and apples. There are some package goods, but the majority are in bulk. Sixtieth Street is an export proposition. Very little stuff comes there to sell. At 130th Street the receipts are very light. At 60th Street there is no restriction at all. All kinds 212 of goods come there, but there is no market distribution. One Hundred and Thirtieth Street is used only ordinarily for wine grape people. There are certain ones located in that vicinity that buy in the Brockton Belt wine grapes in trays and get them in in carloads under refrigeration, and they sell them out to the small wine merchants in that neighborhood. Potatoes and apples are very seldom sold there. Occasionally a car of apples or a car of potatoes may come there. We do not know 130th Street as a delivering proposition, but there is no restriction on it. If a man wanted a car of apples sent to 130th Street, all he has to do is to say so and it would go there and be delivered there. Melrose is a general delivery point. Anything goes there — bulk, package goods, everything. We do not make estimates of the quantities of the various commodities received at our stations and could not give them without figuring up the amounts. I get a daily report every morning of every car of fruit and vegetables that come to Barclay Street, where it is from, who for, and the particular commodity in it. But we never compile reports covering a given period of time. We now and then tally on com- modities from certain sections. For instance, we are developing now in western New York a peach growing belt. It is interesting to know how that is coming along; so I do know just how many cars of peaches we had out of our western New York peach growing belt this year and where they went. Some roads compile reports by packages for purposes other than what we would require. For instance, the Pennsylvania Pier 29 is a market, and there is certain space on that pier for market purposes that is preferable to other space. Now, in the distribution or allotting of that space they are governed by the amount of business that each firm does, and for the purpose of knowing from year to year who the coming year will; have first choice on allotted space, the railroad keeps track by packages of the num- ber of packages that each firm receives, and when the year's business is done and it comes time to assign the spaces, they will figure out that some firm had the greatest number of packages and they are entitled to first choice, and so on in order of im- portance, determining importance by the number of packages received in the previous year by the particular firms. I do not mean to say that we cannot tell tonnage or quantity that comes by dock delivery from our record. We can, of course, do that. The capacity of a pier, of course, depends on the rapidity of delivery. I have known, within the last four weeks, of our having 125 cars down at Barclay Street on a Monday morning. Monday is our largest day, because there is no market on Sunday and on Monday we get the accumulation. We have several times been obliged, without a hood or shelter, to unload and use the "Farm," as it is known, the space between the bulkhead and the track in West Street. I think there have been days in the last month that we perhaps used that space for 25 or 30 cars in addition, to the pier. The pier can accommodate, I should say, 100 cars at once. The market at Barclay Street starts at 7 a. m. We deliver from then on as long as they want It is the understanding with the trade that any business that cannot be put down and unloaded on the pier at 7 a. m. won't come down until the next day. It is held at the upper yards or over in Jersey at Weehawken. The trade come down to make their purchases, and when they come there at 7 o'clock the retailers and others want to find all there is. By half past nine or ten o'clock most of the people have made their selections and purchases, and gone. There is no market building there. The pier itself is covered, but there is nothing in the way of refrigeration or protection from the sun except the covering of the pier. There was a time when we used both Piers 16 and 17 for ordinary house freight — package delivery of merchandise — with- out confining one to fruits and vegetables, but as that business has grown, Pier 17 is to-day given up entirely to fruits and vegetables. The trucks drive in on the pier to get the stuff there, and there is the same con- 213 gestion there in the busy part of the market that there is on every other fruit or vegetable receiving pier of any other road in the city. There is considerable con- gestion, which must result in delay in the delivery of the goods. In the busy part of the market they get blocked, as they do in front of the Pennsylvania piers. If you go down there at 2 o'clock in the morning, you will see in the busy season it will take 25 or 30 officers to keep th-e teams in line. The cost of such delay is of course put on the goods. We are not troubled with delays and congestion at 33d Street, or 60th Street, or 130th Street, that I know of. I have been around among the markets for a good many years. I have been associated with the perishable freight business, traveling all through the South and West in the growing sections during their season, so that I am acquainted to some extent with the perishable goods trade in New York City. I think that the present methods of distribution within New York City could be changed for the better so that there would be a gain in quickness. What is known as The Bronx of New York has over 500,000 people. That is one-eighth of the people in Greater New York. Greater New York has a population of one-twentieth of the entire population of the United States. The methods of dis- tribution in the City of New York are not what they should be. It does not seem right to me that The Bronx which, if it was a separate city would be the eighth or ninth largest city in the United States, should be obliged to be a tail to the head of Greater New York. My idea has always been that The Bronx should be treated as separate and distinct as a delivering point as if it were a city of itself located 200 miles away. There are more people in The Bronx to-day than there are in Buffalo. I would establish a market there and make direct deliveries to that market. What is the use of a railroad pulling down over the Hudson Division, which has a funeral procession of trains all the while— the tracks are full of them — pulling clear down to New York, requiring your good people up there to take their wagons and drive down 10 miles to load up and cart their goods back to deliver to the hucksters and grocers? There is no reason why The Bronx, Melrose Junction, if you please, should not take direct from the West, from New York State, from all growing sections their products, which should never see Spuyten Duyvil and the West Side down to Desbrosses Street, Barclay Street, St. John's Park, 130th Street, or any other place downtown. They should be treated as a separate proposition and dealt with right there. I ani speaking now of The Bronx because we reach The Bronx by direct trackage. I have not studied the other boroughs of the city so much as I have The Bronx. I have been quite interested in The Bronx for some little time. You know we have had measures under foot to make some changes. We have just increased the capacity of the Westchester Avenue house there so that it will relieve Melrose Junction and enable us to have more room for the delivery of this stuff at Melrose Jufiction. When this problem is settled, as it must be and will be by direct delivery to that great city of The Bronx, we will take one-eighth of the deliveries to Greater New York that we now receive at Barclay Street and Desbrosses Street and other points distant from The Bronx, and deliver those products where they belong. That would take just that percentage of the business out of the congested section of New York and relieve the situation just so much. When I speak of a market I mean a railroad terminal where goods can be delivered. I have not gone into the specific kind of market. Direct delivery of goods. into The Bronx would relieve the congestion on the lower West Side to just the extent that The Bronx has to come down there for their goods now. I do not know whether it would be an advantage from a redistributing point of view if the goods that are now delivered at several points along the West Side could be carried to one delivery point. Custom regulates that. Naturally a person 214 would say, what has the lower section of Greater New York to do with having any of the trade down there? The people that consume the goods are not there — but the houses are down there. Concentrating the deliveries at one point has worked out very satisfactorily in other cities. Take the city of Pittsburgh to-day. Pittsburgh has a produce market at the 16th Street station. It does not make any difference whether the stuff comes from the West, from the East, from the North, or from the South; whether it comes Panhandle or how it comes. It comes into that market. It is run right into that one terminal. It is a union terminal, of the Pennsylvania lines west and east, not the other roads, but they handle probably 85 per cent, of all the fruits and vegetables in the city of Pittsburgh. You go into Baltimore and you will find the Bolton yards; go into Philadelphia with its South- west Philadelphia Market; go into Newark with their Market Street yards — they have one central point to handle that particular commodity; that is, on the one road. So far as I know, there has never been any disposition here to make a union terminal. Of course, things become congested. Take, for instance, the California fruit received by the Erie because of their facilities at Duane Street and their con- nections. The Erie has established an auction system, and naturally the orange and deciduous fruit people get goods where they are sold at auction. They just as naturally go to Duane Street for that. There are seasons of the year when so much of it comes along that the day is not long enough to sell it. We have had auctions from 8 o'clock in the morning until 7 o'clock in the evening, yet car after car was left over on the other side of the river. The auction method disposes of goods quickly. Richmond is a B. & O. proposition. We have no stations there. If we had goods consigned to Richmond we would give them to the B. & O. to take over there. We have a station in Brooklyn — Wallabout Station. We have a car float connection but no yard. We deliver to our Wallabout Station. Of course, we have the different terminal companies over there— the Bush Dock, the Brooklyn Eastern District, the Jay Street Terminal, and the New York Dock and others — from which we receive goods and to which we deliver goods in Brooklyn. Those are private terminals. If goods originate at the Bush Docks, with their great in- dustrial warehouses, it is loaded there in cars. We have a classification of cars over there for Chicago, Cleveland, and different points, and the cars are brought over to us at our 68th Street berth or at Weehawken, to go by the West Shore. Most of it is for the west side of the river. And that is under a contract with the terminal companies for handling. When our car goes to one of those docks it is practically turned over to the terminal company, and they handle it and pay all expenses of handling it and float it with their own floats. Wallabout, Brooklyn, is our own station. We have our own agent there, just the same as at Barclay or. Desbrosses Street. Long Island City is handled by the Long Island Railroad Company. We interchange business with the Long Island Railroad, of course. If they have business from their own road that is going to Syracuse they will bring it to Long Island City, put it on the floats and bring it over to our 68th Street bridges and deliver it to us to take to Syracuse. Where shipments emanate from places like the Bush Docks, they go for the regular New York rate, without additional charge. Anything coming within lighterage limits of New York would be approximately the same. The rate from Bush Docks to Chicago is exactly the same as the rate from New York to Chicago. All of Brooklyn, Queens, The Bronx, and Richmond enjoy the New York rate. I have thought a great deal about the better distribution of perishable foods in New York City, and I have read many articles on the subject, a great many by people who evidently, from my viewpoint, did not know what they were talking about They condemn what they call the middleman, and, in some respects, call the middleman a 215 highway robber. Why, they could not do without the middleman. He is just as essential to the distribution of goods as it is essential to have some one grow the goods. The present methods of distribution, so far as some sections taking a direct delivery is concerned — The Bronx, for instance — could be much relieved. But, no matter what you could do, in the busy portion of the year, where things have been congested for years, I do not know how you could remedy that. It has been tried by the railroads. Some years ago the Pennsylvania Railroad, when the business got . very heavy this side of the river, so much So that things were congested, tried to arbitrarily force a delivery of those goods on the Jersey side. That was just simply a failure. The people would not go there. No attempt, that I know of, has ever been made by any railroad to combine with other railroads in the formation of a union terminal. All efforts have been made on the part of individual roads for the bettering of their own business. I have for a good many years been associated with the perishable fruit and vege- table business of the country. I have been engaged more or less in the development of methods in this respect — in going into communities and pointing out to them how they might in all points benefit themselves and their own community by development of crops and diversifying crops that in some sections were neglected; where the Almighty in His wisdom had provided the facilities for rotation of crops, and there seemed to have been a missed cog in the wheel in those particular places. I have endeavored to show them how they could drop in some commodity and raise it which would result in making a continuous, rotating movement out of that com- medity. I have run onto some interesting things in connection with that. Take Long Island, for instance, with its cauliflower industry. There is a highly satisfactory climate and there is the salt air passing over that enables them to produce a wonderful cauliflower. But four weeks earlier, in Cape May county, with the salt air from the ocean blowing directly over the same soil, they can produce the same crop. By producing it there that makes the season just so much longer. The result is the doubling of produce and the doubling of the season. We did a good bit of that kind of work. We did a great deal of that development work, and we used to bring in the seed houses and the men familiar with that part of it. Of course, the rkilroads, with their increased speed and increased refrigerating facilities, have made the seasons very much longer. For instance, there was a time on strawberries when the season for strawberries was only six weeks long. That was all the time that we could get strawberries. Now you start in in February with the Florida strawberries and you have strawberries until the middle of next July from northern New York. This works two ways — ^to the advantage of the producer and the consumer and also to the advantage of the transportation company. In July the same cars after refrigeration are taking berries south from northern producing states that in May were taking them from North Carolina north to those same points. The methods used, and the increased speed, and the entire situation make a very interesting study. Distribution. — The distribution of a crop from any large growing section is interesting, not as applied specially to the distribution of New York City and its various places, but distribution itself is intensely interesting. The word distribution covers a lot, and regulates, to a certain extent, this matter of the cost of high living. The producer naturally must make money. If he doesn't he won't produce. The railroads are anxious for the grower to make money. The more he makes the more his growth will be. The greater his growth the greater the quantity to be shipped. The greater the quantity shipped the more money there is to the carrier and, naturally, the better the price to the consumer. Now, on the question of railroads: It is doubtful if railroads get proper credit 216 for the part they take in the development of the agricultural sections. I rememher having been the pioneer in the North Carolina strawberry growing belt. I went in there a number of years ago and found that 400 cars of strawberries from North Carolina were distributed to only 12 markets. That then was the largest year they had ever had. I happened to be in Wilmington, North Carolina, at a meeting of the directors of the North Carolina Fruit Growers and Truck Growers' Association. When asked by them whether I had any suggestions to make to better their condi- tion I told them I did not come up there to run their business, but that the thought occurred to me that they did not give their crop a wide enough distribution. I told them that 400 cars to 12 markets was not enough markets. You can glut New York just as easy as Binghamton, New York, by sending too much fruit there, and when too much fruit goes to any market the prices are bound to go down to a point where money is lost by everybody. I said to them, now send your goods to more- markets, and then and there we took up the task of increasing the distribution. Nine years after that, remembering when I first met them that they shipped 400 cars to 12 markets, I had the pleasure of knowing that that year they shipped 3,200 carloads to 82 different markets. That was a pretty good result and it was entirely due to co- operation on the part of the societies, the railroads, and everybody to make a proper distribution. The result was entirely satisfactory to the growers and to the consumers and to the carrier. Everybody was benefited. But 82 markets was not enough. We had 3,500 carloads of peaches out of western New York this year on our rails. We sent them to 275 markets. That is distribution. It is known to-day that there are enough trees planted and not bearing in western New York to make possible five years hence, if it is a good peach year, the necessity of our assisting in the distribution of 10,000 carloads of peaches, and that is 1,000 cars more than was ever moved out of a peach producing section in the world in one year. Fifteen years ago Delaware shipped 9,000 cars in one year. That was the greatest number ever shipped from one section. Two years ago Georgia shipped 7,200 cars. That is the second largest year. So you see we are in line in a very short time to be up to the point where we are going to be away up top among the peach producing sections, but, in order to be that, the railroads must keep pace with the times and help toward finding places to ship those peaches. That is one of the functions of a railroad corporation that the public does not appreciate, and yet which costs the railroads enormous sums of money every year. We suggest the places and assist in creating them to the extent of even inducing men to go into the business. Of course, the shipper has his own option as to where they shall go. I remember one place where, in a good city in our eastern states, they had no commission men. The city was big enough to take a carload of North Carolina berries every other day, but there was no one there to handle them. I went to that city. I went to a wholesale grocer and asked him why he could not go into that business. I said, here is good money for you and there is no reason why you cannot pick up a couple of thousand dollars this year right on that. He said, that is out of our line. I said, is it any more out of your line than to handle cold storage products in connection with a butcher business? He commenced to think. He said, how can we do that? I said, there are several ways— you can buy the goods outright or you can receive them on consignment and sell them for a com- mission. Your city ought to be on the map and ought to be a receiving point He got on the map. And that city has taken anywhere from three to five cars a week of North Carolina strawberries every year since that time, thanks to the railroad for suggesting the way to the receiver and to the shipper— but the railroad got no thanks for taking that part in it. We have more of a problem to solve assisting in the development of the agricul- tural regions tfian the average person understands. You have read of our farm 217 trains. They are our educational trains that we run. It was my duty as special agent, I should say it was my privilege and pleasure as special agent, to be sergeant- at-arms and conductor of those farm trains run through agricultural sections. And it was indeed a pleasure to hear the Cornell experts and others explain to the farmers things they did not know and listen to the questions by persons about what they wanted to know. That was most interesting. It cost us a lot of money, but it was money well invested. It was sowing the seed. We commence now to perceive where benefits are coming from and that the communities are bettered. If a producer can be assured of a good market he is likely to produce more goods. If he finds he has made money on a 10-acre peach patch this year, he is induced to put in five acres more next year, if he thinks it will pay him to do so ; but, if he lost money on them this year, he would not be so apt to increase his acreage. A good, steady-priced market, the price being such as to enable the producer to realize a reasonable profit, is, of course, the ideal thing. Nobody expects, in these days, to get rich on a farm the first year, but he does not want to lose money on it. I do not know what percentage of perishables is brought here by the different lines. Of course, the southern produce, the all-rail, is largely brought by the Pennsylvania. But, you take Norfolk, Virginia. That is, for ninety days in the year, the largest shipping station of perishable freight that there is in the world. Ninety-five per cent, of this comes here by water over the Old Dominion Line. Sections, according to the commodity, differ. If Georgia this year has 4,S00 carloads of peaches, probably 1,500 of them, or one-third of the crop, will come to New York City. In our estimating our western New York peach belt this year I was keeping tabs to see how close New York came to getting one-third of the western New York State peaches. They did not do it. They only took one-fifth. Now conditions differ according to other peach crops. Western Maryland and New Jersey have peach crops. Con- necticut did have last year, but not this. Those things are regulated by seasons. It is a hard matter to tell how this question of distribution of products to Greater New York fruits and vegetables can be handled to the best advantage. You take downtown, where the markets are now, with the Old Dominion Line and the Desbrosses Street, our pier, and the Clyde Line and the Ocean Steamship Company and the Baltimore & Ohio and the Central Railroad of New Jersey and our Barclay Street pier, etc., they are all there. That is where the commission houses are, that is where the stores are, and that is where the trade is. It is a long way from the places where the stuff goes to be finally disposed of. To some it would appear ridiculous that everybody has to come down to Barclay Street after apples; and to Duane Street after oranges; and to Pier No. 29 for their southern truck. But that is a condition. It is there. The dealers are located down there. It would be a pretty hard proposition to get away from there. If we tried to move the points of delivery farther up the river I don't know whether the trade would follow or not. I know that every time we have made any endeavor to go west, as Horace Greeley said, we have had the entire trade opposed to it. In regard to The Bronx I am speaking only for the New York Central Railroad. We reach The Bronx, have plenty of ground, and go there direct over our own rails, and we have a place at Westchester Avenue to take care of merchandise business with increased facilities; and we have the great Melrose yard for track delivery and for a market house delivery, making a market in an open house there the same as on Pier 29. Personally, I would like to see Melrose Junction put on the same footing as Pier 29 is to-day, and I would like to see some of the large commission houses down town have branches established up in The Bronx to sell directly to The Bronx their goods, so that the people would not have to come 'way downtown for them and haul them back there. Those are my personal views. Of course, there are several schemes of a market proposition for The Bronx. 218 There is a possibility that a market could be made up there that could be supplied not only by our direct railroad connection, but could be supplied by all other railroads by the water connection. Of course, just as much as you make a direct delivery to The Bronx you are relieving the downtown section. If, in proportion to its population, you can deliver directly to The Bronx all products of this kind consumed in The Bronx, you would relieve the congestion downtown to the extent of one-eighth, and even more than that. It is greater than that because you must figure on Yonkers and Mt. Vernon and those places where they all come down just the same as the dealers in The Bronx. If you go up to Van Cortlandt Park at any time at nine o'clock and stand there you will see dozens of teams coming from Yonkers to Pier 29 and Barclay Street to get their wagonload of stuff which they haul back up to Yonkers to sell. If we had a market at Melrose Junction they would not have to go any farther than that. We would like to see them get carload shipments directly to Yonkers, so far as that is concerned. Yonkers, you must remember, is a city of 80,000 people, and abundantly able to stand on its own bottom. It ought not to be neces- sary to pass by Yonkers to get stuff delivered there for sale to customers in Yonkers. How absurd it is to bring goods directly through Yonkers away downtown and then require teams from Yonkers to come downtown, get the goods, and take them back to Yonkers. But you will see team after team coming down from there, making a 20-mile haul, to go back to be huckstered out at your door at The Bronx and in Yonkers. There is business enough in The Bronx for the establishment of an auction house for oranges. If Buffalo, New York, with less population than The Bronx, can have one; if Cleveland, Ohio, has two; if Detroit can have two; if other cities of the size of The Bronx can have one or three auction houses which can live, The Bronx is certainly big enough to have one. And that would relieve the downtown section to just that extent. We would be glad, indeed, to run a Bronx train from the West Albany yard directly into Melrose Junction, McComb's Dam, or any other place agreed upon, just as we would to come to Spuyten Dujrvil, take the West Side tracks and go down to 72d Street yard to float down to Desbrosses or any of the downtown stations. We could make just as quick a delivery at the same rate and we would be glad to do it. Of course, different cities have different hours for market purposes. In Boston where the open market is in Faneuil Hall the teams back up to the cars and are loaded with perishable fruit and cannot get out of the yard until the bell rings at 6 o'clock in the morning. Then the gate is thrown open and the teams go up and back up to the street and the market is on. In New York City at Pier 29 when perishable goods are coming in from the South, the market is one o'clock on highly perishable goods and three o'clock for ordinary fruits and vegetables. At Buffalo, New York, the market is one o'clock in the afternoon. Baltimore has a two o'clock market. There is no early sale in Baltimore. If they wanted to establish in The Bronx the same market hours that the downtown houses have there is no reason why they should not; nor is there any reason why they should not establish a dif- ferent hour. That is up to them. You could have a market at five o'clock, at eight o'clock, three o'clock, one o'clock. The point is, how to reach the point of distribution. Of course, if you get a McComb's Dam market, which is on the carpet now, where you have a rail connec- tion from us and a water connection from everybody else, then you have that solved. If Melrose Junction was an open track delivery and market sheds were there so that goods could be sold as on Pier 29, the question of getting your stuff from the South in the winter months coming in here by the B. & O. and the Penn- sylvania Railroad to that market is an open question. I do not think getting them 219 in over the New York Connecting Bridge would be a difficult matter to handle. If you had your market at McComb's Dam it could be floated around there. We could not now bring mixed carload stuff around from Barclay Street. Barclay Street is not a track station on our road; it is a float station. We don't want the stuff to go to Barclay Street at all, but to go direct to The Bronx from the point of origination. There are a lot of people who attribute the high cost of living to the middleman, and try to do away with the middleman. My thought is that they are on the wrong track. Middlemen are essential in assisting distribution — as essential as the railroads. The farmer would make very poor headway under the postal service or parcels post in trying to sell direct. J. G. June, Superintendent of Terminals, Erie Railroad I have been connected with the Erie Railroad about four years. Our terminals in New York City are as follows: Pier No. 7 on the East River, Piers 20 and 21 on the North River, Pier 39 at the foot of West Houston Street, 28th Street Station, and 49th Street Station, Wallabout Station in Brooklyn. We have no terminals in Richmond or Queens, but in The Bronx a contract terminal at 131st Street. At Pier 7, East River, we deliver package and carload freight; no perishable goods except carload meat. That is mostly a carload delivery. At Pier 20 we de- liver citrus and deciduous fruits for the California Fruit Association. There are two auction rooms on the pier and sales are conducted there. At Pier 39 we make carload deliveries of merchandise, but no perishable goods. At the 28th Street station there is a track delivery of perishable goods in bulk — in carload lots. Apples and potatoes are brought there in bulk. No perishable goods are delivered at 49th Street. We keep track of the deliveries made at Piers 20 and 21, and make monthly com- pilations. Pier 20 is not at all times big enough for the shipments that come. This year at times we had more than we could put on the pier. The capacity of the pier is about 96 cars and the bulkhead about 18 to 20 cars — about 118 cars in all. When there is more than we can handle we keep the surplus under refrigeration until the next day. Sometimes it is left on the float and tied to the pier, so as to be ready for unloading the following morning. We do not have anything to do with the trucking from the pier. The time of greatest congestion on the piers is in August and September and sometimes the first part of October, whenever there is an unusual movement of fruit. These con- gested periods naturally result in delays in delivery. I cannot say whether such delays result in much spoilage, as we deliver the goods on the pier and then lose sight of them. I believe that too much concentration is sure to make delay, but it seems to me that establishing more facilities cannot help but eliminate a good deal of the delay and congestion. The perishable goods delivered by our road are apples, peaches, pears, grapes, onions, celery, and potatoes. During my connection with the railroad the trade in perishable goods has increased. Last year was the heaviest year we have had — I sup- pose we had about 25 per cent, more then than in any previous year. The trade seems likely to grow as the city grows and the congestion to increase unless more facilities are provided. We figure on an extension of our own operations to relieve our own congestion. Last fall, to relieve conditions, we opened a pier at Pier 10, but the effort was lost entirely because the consignees would not consign their shipments to Pier 10. If 220 they could not have Pier 20 they would not have any. So we did not get much of a result except some shipments of onions and some grapes. We turned merchandise to Pier 10 in our eflfort to take care of the congestion in fruit. We sent freight which we got on Pier 21, which is a merchandise pier, to Pier 10 and then made room on Pier 21 for the fruit shipments. Pier 20 is a fruit pier — it is equipped with heat. A union terminal, if it helps any road, would help us, but I doubt if a union terminal is going to relieve the situation. We have too much at one point now. We have, it seems to me, too much business in one place. Instead of that it ought to be distributed. If we can distribute our business to all our different piers pro- portionately to the business — the customers in the vicinity — our congestion would be eliminated entirely, but we cannot do that. You cannot establish customers. We have not been able to make them go where they did not want to go. Of course, we have to deliver goods where they are consigned. A union terminal will help if you can get the shippers to consign to it; but, if the shippers would not consign to it, it would not do any good. W. C. Eastman, Special Agent of the Manhattan Division of the Pennsylvania Railroad I have been connected with the Pennsylvania Railroad nearly 32 years and have been special agent since 1901 for the New York section in the handling of freight and piers. For the past 25 years I have spent a great deal of my time looking after the movement and operation of fast freight and special freight trains, and our service in handling perishable freight. We furnish transportation for perishable goods all over the United States — from California, Arizona, Texas, the South, New Orleans, Mississippi; from every State, almost, in the Union, but the vast amount of it comes from Florida, the Carolinas, Georgia, Delaware, Maryland, and the Norfolk district. The very large percentage of it is what we call strictly the southern perish- ables. The highly perishables which come to this market, such as peaches, pears, etc, from north of Cape Charles and north of Baltimore, are delivered in our yards in Jersey City. How much of that comes through New York I cannot say. The same highly perishables from south of Cape Charles and Baltimore are delivered principally to Pier 29, North River, near Desbrosses Street. Highly perishables are delivered in Jersey City; ordinary perishables at piers 20 and 29, and some also in Jersey City. By highly perishables I mean peaches, berries, cantaloupes, early apples, early onions. We do not deliver them in New York City because we have no facilities there to do so. If we could get the facilities we could make the deliveries here. Up until 1901, for instance, we delivered watermelons at Pier 29 in New York City. I think in the summer or early fall of 1902 we had to commence and deliver watermelons from the cars on the tracks at the Jersey City yards. Pier 29 was not large enough to take care of the increased perishable freight and the watermelons too, and, as watermelons are not highly perishable freight, we transferred them to Jersey City. The delivery of perishable freight is not confined to piers. We have had it delivered actually from the street on West Street, in front of the hoods and north and south of the hoods. We deliver in New York City at Pier 29 and from the street in front of Pier 29, and at Wallabout, Brooklyn, by car floats. Very little, if any, is delivered at the regular merchandise stations, at our 37th Street and 38th Street yards. We bring all kinds of food products to New York — canned goods, flour — almost everything. Cereals are delivered at Piers 1 and 4, 27, 28, 37th Street, North 221 River, and 12Sth Street, Harlem River. We take very little up to our 12Sth Street Station. It is within the lighterage limits and takes the same rate. We have no carfloat connection on The Bronx side. We earn no more in delivering to The Bronx and charge no more than if we had a terminal there. On the Brooklyn side we have the Brooklyn E. D. Station, at the foot of North 4th Street, and the Wallabout Station in the Wallabout Basin, and we deliver at the Jay Street terminal, the New York Dock and the Bush Docks. The present facilities are adequate for the traffic with the exception of when we have some of these fearful rushes, when the lines will be adequate to do the work but the terminals will not. In other words, the markets will not take care of the goods. Then there are the changes in demand. Take, for instance, watermelons. They will come here and be put on the tracks for delivery in Jersey City, and if you have a little cool weather people do not want watermelons; they won't take them. But the watermelons, nevertheless, will keep coming in and are still being shipped from the South. As a consequence you are liable to have ISO to 200 carloads of watermelons on hand. They won't take them as fast as they are shipped and received here. I hardly know how you can remedy a situation like this. You cer- tainly cannot compel a man to eat watermelons if he doesn't want them. But, if I were a shipper and found the market off in New York, I would certainly try to ship to some other place where I could get a market for my product. We can hardly force things on an unwilling market. Where we have to keep the cars in our yards it leads to congestion. We add no charges for that. The largest proportion of melons are shipped to a consignee who pays the charges. They are shipped on commission. As I understand it, he pays the freight charges, deducts them from the price for which they sell and deducts his commission and makes a corresponding return to the shipper. If there is congestion, the delay cost comes out of our pocket, of course. We would be benefited if terminal facilities were made better, so that the terminals would be sufficient. We would be benefited if there was a terminal where we could run our cars and unload them speedily. It is difficult to say what effect facilities will have on marketing. We will load up Pier 29 with perishable freight and market men will come there. There will be any number of them to buy, but they will wait in the hope that the prices will go down. They will not take the goods quickly. They have to buy quickly when the time comes, but they cause much congestion by waiting and holding the stuff on the pier, where it congests the pier and compels us to hold stuff on the other side that ought to come over and be unloaded. That congestion has a tendency to diminish business. It certainly diminishes the amount of freight you can deliver, and to that extent it diminishes the price for the producer to send stuff in here and makes a poorer market for him. There are two markets at Piers 27, 28, and 29. The first market in the California season is opened at 1 a. m. That is for peaches, berries, cantaloupes, etc., and the Stuff is put on the front of the bulkhead. When the vegetable market commences it is opened at 3 a. m. and that is put on Pier 29 under the hoods and out in the street and north of Pier 28 on the bulkhead. There is a congestion of wagons out there until the morning, until they get rid of the biggest portion of that stuff. All this congestion leads to higher prices and less consumption. Nobody is benefited by these conditions. A terminal market, I should say, would be a relief if it were large enough and were located conveniently. It would hardly be unless it was put on the water- front where the floats could get to it quickly and get unloaded and get away. A terminal market would need to be accessible to boats and trains. The receipts of highly perishable goods start in the latter part of March and 222 begin to get heavy, and then run heavy up until the middle or toward the latter part of September. The very heaviest work of the year is in May and June. They come all the year round, but those are the heaviest portions of the year. There is no time when we are not receiving perishable freight, and during other times of the year other railroads further north are bringing in perishable goods, so that there is a succession the year round of perishable goods coming in from the different roads. The season begins in Florida and we are running some little stuff from Florida now (January). Then we get in a second crop of vegetables before the Carolina stuff begins to come. Then the Norfolk comes along. So I should say that a large terminal market would have a continuous, all-the-year-round succession of perishable goods coming in over all the railroads; but it would have to be a very large market. I think it would have a tendency to establish prices and make a continuous supply and demand the year round. If the causes of loss in delays, congestion, etc., could be eliminated, the producer would be likely to get more for his produce, and that would encourage him to raise more. That would benefit him, the carrier, and the consumer. If this freight were run into a terminal market that had refrigeration that would save re-icing. That is done by the shippers and at the shippers' expense at the present time and that expense could be done away with under improved Circumstances. The re-icing charge is $2.50 a ton on our road. It is actually done at a loss to the road. We have to shift the cars from one part of the yard to another to re-ice, and shift them back again to be put on the pier. The compensation doesn't pay us for it, but it is one of the necessities of the business. It also means further congestion of our terminals. There is a demurrage charge for cars kept over in Jersey and that is covered by a tariff which I can send you. It is filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission. The regular demurrage charge is $1 per car per day after 48 hours. We have had to hold watermelons at Jersey City in the meadows SO or 60 cars at a time until they could be accommodated on the tracks in Jersey City. We have had to put embargoes on their shipment because we had such an accumulation. At times the commission men have not been able to handle them because they have not been able to get them in the market, on account of congestion in the market, and because there was no place to receive them. I have known cars to be held in the Jersey meadows a week or more. It is not a frequent occurrence, but it is an occurrence when you have a congestion, as we have had every season for the last four or' five years. All these delays tend to raise prices here and discourage the producers. When cars arrive here and the contents are in such condition that the consignees are forced to refuse them for freight charges, they are passed on by the health officers and, if there is anything fit for sale, it is turned over to a commission man to sell; if not fit for sale, it is taken off and destroyed. Wherever salvage is ob- tainable by the railroad company the company does obtain that salvage by selling the contents of the car and getting what is possible, to get. But that is governed entirely by the health officer, who determines whether the stuff is fit to sell or not. If we had proper distribution in New York there would be no such delay in Jersey City. Where the cars are slow in moving, the cars received first are put on the market first, so that, in the case of watermelons in the congested season, you will find for days and days, while fresh cars are arriving, the market is getting the older cars out ot condition and by the time the fresh cars get their proper position, they are also out of condition. The delays here do not come from any other source but the lack of terminals. Our road is adequate and has no trouble except at terminals. 223 H. H. Benedict, Assistant General Freight Agent of the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad and New England Navigation Company I have been in my present position a little less than a year, but in the business for seventeen years. I have been in the employ of this railroad for seven years, handling the general freight business of the company from a traffic standpoint. I am located at Pier 14, North River. Our delivery point in Manhattan for railroad delivery is Pier 39, near Mont- gomery Street; our Harlem delivery is at 132d Street and Lincoln Avenue, in The Bronx. The boat line deliveries, with which we work in conjunction, come in the New Haven at Pier 27, the Bridgeport Line at Piers 27 and 28, East River; the Fall River and Providence Line comes in at Piers 14 and 15 ; and the Norwich and New Bedford Line at Pier 40. Our lines serve New England principally. Some two years ago I became much interested in the development of the produce industry in The Bronx, with the idea that The Bronx, which is, perhaps, the eighth or ninth largest city in the country, had no market for produce to speak of. Mer- chants up there had to come downtown. So we built The Bronx produce house and built it about 1,100 feet long in 24 sections, and we have endeavored as far as possi- ble to put in rates with all railroads in the United States on a fiat New York basis. That connects with the great Pennsylvania system and puts almost the entire country, except some of the nearby points, on a fiat New York rate with that market. In the past we have handled principally Maine products, potatoes, onions, turnips, but it has been difficult for us to develop a market up in The Bronx, although the facilities are all there, because The Bronx merchants come down here where they can get all kinds of goods in the market. It is the disadvantage of having our market on the single line. But in August of last year we handled quite a large quantity of produce in The Bronx where the year before we handled nothing, due to the fact that we had rates with the Pennsylvania on a New York basis. We also make carfloat deliveries in the Brooklyn Eastern District, Northeast Street, New York Docks, Bush Docks, and also Warren Street, Jersey City. Our heaviest traffic has been the marketing of potatoes in The Bronx during the fall and winter months, but in the general produce business we hope to maintain a market there all the year round. There would be no difficulty in our road delivering goods to a terminal market up there if the connections were feasible. We would want to be assured of good facilities. So far from there being any objection to it — I have been going to your meetings for two years to keep track of it; we are anxious to work with you. Our road would benefit by taking goods out of the market as well as bringing them in. We might have a sale of goods from there to a local point like Bridgeport or New Haven. So it would be to our advantage to have just such terminal facilities in The Bronx. Our deliveries from the market, of course, would continue the year round, while our heaviest trade now is bringing goods into the market simply during the winter months. The more trade out of the market, the bigger it would grow and the more supplies would be likely to come in, and, as a consequence, the people could get their goods cheaper. There would be more encouragement to farmers to produce and send their goods in. At present we are not bothered with terminal congestion in The Bronx, as far as produce goes. We have gone ahead of it, perhaps. We have almost too great facilities for our business. The street facilities for getting into our yards are very fair. We have an entrance at the lower end of our yard and a gateway at the upper end, and the traffic through that gateway we intend to encourage. But the streets are not in very good condition there. To be perfectly frank, the only trouble 224 with our market there is that the trade comes down here and does not come to us as much as we hoped it would, although we have practically a New York rate with all lines except the Jersey Central and the New York Central. We will be glad to take in all the other roads into our terminal at a slight return to us in order to encourage the produce business there. WHOLESALE Joseph E. Reid, Produce Commission Merchant I have been personally in this business about twenty years; my firm has been in it for SS years. We handle goods on consignment from the various seaports and dif- ferent sections of the country — Porto Rico, Cuba. We take in practically everything in the produce line; We do not specialize in any particular commodity, but handle all lines of goods in varying quantities at different seasons of the year. At some seasons of the year we, of course, handle very heavily in one line and other things at other seasons of the year, depending upon the season and nature of the product. There are seasons of the year, of course, when certain commodities are not in the market practically at all. But we take in practically all lines during the various seasons of the year. Our house probably handles $1,500,000 worth of produce in a year, wholesale value. In nearly every case the goods are shipped to us directly by the producers. There are some cases where a man may purchase goods at the point of shipment and ship them to us on consignment. We sell at wholesale by private sale. We do not sell at auction at all. Various receivers sell produce of various kinds at auction — apples, potatoes, fruits, including oranges, pineapples, grapefruit. There are three or four concerns that act as auctioneers. They have auctioneers on the Erie Railroad dock. There are auctioneers that handle a great deal of Porto Rico fruits and vegetables and that handle the goods for the receiver — licensed auctioneers. Railroad delivery consists of the placing of the goods in our hands, in our care, by the railroad company. Railroad delivery to the purchaser means the delivery of an order to him for the goods. The railroad delivery here in New York on the Pennsylvania Railroad, for instance, would be the placing by the railroad company in the department of each receiver the goods assigned to him. That is what I con- sider to be the railroad delivery to us. The cars are brought over from Jersey City on floats owned by the railroad. Their own men put the goods on trucks and bring them out to us. The goods are then right in our care. There is no railroad delivery by automobile or horse-drawn trucks in the city. The goods are shipped to us on consignment and the commission merchant to-day who has to handle these goods must do so to the best advantage possible for his shipper. There are very crude ideas about what a commission merchant is. In the first place, the commission merchant is in competition with all other commission merchants. In some cases the goods are divided by the shipper and each commission merchant probably is doing his utmost to obtain the highest price he can for his particular shipper, to get the best net results. There is a vast difference, however, between the price charged by the commission merchant or the price at which he sells and the price paid by the consumer. We have some goods that are delivered to our store — potatoes, we will say. They will sell at a certain price at wholesale. A bag of potatoes averaging 180 pounds will sell perhaps for $2.25. That is only about V/i cents a pound. Those potatoes may be sold to what might be classed the jobbers. The jobber has to take 225 them to his particular store and dispose of them in a great many cases by small measure. He sells them to the retailers. He, of course, expects to make a certain profit besides the handling of his potatoes and cartage. The grocer then sells them to the consumers. I have bills where potatoes costing $2.25 by the bag of about 180 pounds, costing therefore about 1JS4 cents a pound, were sold by the grocer four quarts for 25 cents, or about 6% cents a quart, whereas they did not cost originally over lyi cents a quart. That would be $5 a bag, where at wholesale they cost $2.25. There are about 2yi pounds in a quart. I want to show that these things are not faults for which the commission merchant is entirely responsible. The so-called high prices being paid to-day are the result of the additional charge made by the retailer. Sweet potatoes cost on the average $1.50 to $2 a barrel; that is not over 3 cents a quart. I find that the retailer charges 12J4 cents a quart. Of course, in all these articles considerable has to be allowed for waste and additional costs after the goods leave the commission merchant. Cauliflower sells from $1.50 to $3 a barrel; that is practically 6 cents a head, and it retails at 20 cents. Where they cost 9 cents they retail at 30 cents. That is an advance of nearly 300 per cent. Then again, take the condition of our onion market. At the present day (December, 1912) onions are practically a drug on the market and the price at which the commission merchant will sell onions is about a cent and a half a quart. I have bills where at the same time the retailers have charged 10 and 15 cents a quart. Of course, the retailer has considerable in the way of loss that the consumer does not realize, because he is unacquainted with the causes of that loss. For in- stance, he may buy corn on the market for $1.50 a hundred. Every housewife when she goes there examines the corn, and, if the corn does not suit her after opening it, she throws it back. The next housewife does practically the same thing. Of course, a certain portion of that wasted or injured product has to be disposed of at a price way below the regular price. I am only saying this to account for the difference between the price that is paid to the first handler, the commission mer- chant, and the price that ultimately is paid by the consumer. Then again, take the crops in the different years. The price of goods varies. A good many consumers cannot understand why they have to pay more at one time for goods than at another time. I claim that is largely due to supply and demand. Some seem to think that those two words should be put on the shelf, but I think those two words and the weather conditions have a great deal to do with prices ob- tained for goods to-day on the market. I do not know that I would care to say that delays in the delivery of goods here at the terminals help to add to the cost of these things. For instance, I have figures to-day of one line that has handled a maximum of 14,000 carloads in a week. On Sun- day night they unloaded 314 cars; the other five nights of the week they unloaded an average of 220 carloads. They say that had they unloaded or had to unload 300 carloads every night the market could not have held up, the prices could not have held up and the market perhaps would have become glutted. The goods would have been allowed to stand and, would not have been disposed of, and the loss would have been very great. If there were 314 carloads unloaded Sunday night and the trade could only take 225 or 230 carloads, you would have from SO to 75 carloads to be held over on the dock until the next day. If prices were lower they might take them off, but that would lower the prices of all of them. That might be of benefit to the city, but not to the farmer. Some- times the farmer could afford to take less for his product per unit if he could sell more goods. It is possible that that -would bring him in a greater gross return. Sometimes the condition of the market, due to the immense quantities coming in, is what we call a glutted condition and the goods will not move. There are no means 226 of handling them so they can move. If the trade will take the goods off fast enough there will be no delay. The railroad company claims that, if they could unload 314 cars Sunday night and the yards and docks were not congested, they could unload 314 cars on Monday night. Trucks are often delayed. Sometimes a truck will have a number of parties to call upon for its goods. The truckman may be delayed by some one ahead of him. I do not know that there is any unusual congestion along those lines. On this question of the 314 cars unloaded in one night : The capacity of the piers is not large enough to hold 314 cars unloaded at once. If they were absolutely clear of all material they could not unload 314 cars at one time and place them on the piers and under the bonnets. Part of the material has to be removed before the rest can be unloaded. There is considerable variation in the value of the commodities un- loaded at 1 A. M. and the same commodities ready for delivery five hours later. The later price is considerably lower when the market hours are practically over. If the market opens at one o'clock the buyers are there and ready to buy. They want the goods on their stands as early as possible and they pay much higher for the early delivery than for the goods obtained later in the day. The market hours vary according to the season. Fruits open at the earlier hours, at 1 o'clock; produce about two hours later, in order to give an opportunity for the fruit to be moved out of the way, because it is more perishable. In order to get the best prices, delivery must be made in the early market hours. And, if the volume of goods is not delivered during those hours, the supply is shorter than it would be if they were delivered before the market hours. The supply being shorter the prices which retailers charge will be larger to the consumer. There is an increase in the price to the consumer by reason of the lack of handling facilities. There are not handling facilities suflS- cient to take care of these goods in the profitable hours to have them unloaded all at one time. If the goods could all be unloaded promptly at the same time, I think •the prices would average considerably lower. The necessity for early buying is prompted largely by the buyers from outlying districts who are compelled to make their market at an early hour. The price largely regulates the quantity they buy. If the prices are 10 or IS per cent, lower to the earlier buyer he would naturally increase his requirements proportionally. So, if all the goods were unloaded and ready for delivery at the one hour, while the price would not be as high, a better average price would result. There would not be any low glut price. There would be a fair average price that all consumers would get advantage of. That would undoubtedly increase the quantity of foodstuffs consumed. The average prices being better, it would result in benefit to the farmer, and, as the farmer raises his crops according to results, he would probably raise more. So better handling facilities would result, in the first place, in lower prices for the consumer, in the second place, in an increase in the prices to the farmer, and, in the third place, to probably larger aggregate profits to the retailers, although per- haps smaller unit profits, and an increase in the average price. The average cartage expenses involved from the terminal to the storeroom is about six cents a barrel. A large sugar barrel would probably cost 7j4 to 10 cents. That would be the rate for the zone below 14th Street. Above that would be a higher rate. That would be for barrels of spinach, kale, lettuce, etc. That is the rate agreed upon by the Market Truckmen's Association and various associations that are interested in arriving at a proper charge. That rate does not include any rebates; it is a flat rate. Th^y give rebates in certain lines, I think, but I do not think the commission merchant does that He has his own trucks or else employs them at a certain rate. I presume they arrive at this flat rate taking into con- sideration the congestion on the streets or docks whereby these trucks are delayed. 227 Of course, a man does not know when he takes a certain load from a certain pier whether he will be held up an hour or whether he can get those goods off in 10 minutes, so it is necessary to average it up. If the delays were eliminated it would seem to be likely that competition would reduce those trucking rates and the result would be that the truckmen would get just as good a compensation and at the same time could afford to haul for less. It is not unusual for a truck to wait from 8 p. M. to 5 A. M. in line to get its load during the summer months. Then they get some short hauls during the day that help up their averages. The vast difference between wholesale and retail prices is partly accounted for by the fact that there is a great deal of waste in the goods before they are finally disposed of. The retail grocer, as a rule, will not come to the commission merchant for his goods. He goes to the jobber, where he can purchase all his line. The jobber knows what his trade will want and he procures from the market the various lines, he deals with the various receivers and he gets all the lines he needs to cover his particular trade. Then the retail grocer will go to him and purchase his single barrel of apples, his basket or barrel of lettuce or cauliflower, and such goods as he wants. Of course, there has to be a price for cartage. If goods are taken to Gansevoort, or Harlem, or Wallabout Market there has to be a certain price added as cartage by the jobber, and he naturally must get a certain profit — 25 or 10 cents a package, as the case may be. Then the grocer buying that package and putting it out to the consumer in small lots may lose a half barrel of spinach on the barrel, which increases the cost, and he must make it up in the balance. There may be some goods that have to be thrown away, that are spoiled or left over. All these things go into the increased cost that the consumer has to pay. It must also be understood that the retailer must live. His living expenses must come out of his work and included in his expenses must be considered rent and very many other items. If he could purchase his goods by the market basket from the commission merchant at the rate goods are sold by the commission merchant, there would be a vast difference in the price, but that is simply impossible. You must take into con- sideration that this army of jobbers and retailers is absolutely necessary. Their cost must come in somewhere. Also all the various little items that add to the expense are practically inevitable. Produce in the New York market usually passes through four hands — ^the producer, who ships to the commission merchant; then the jobber; and then the retail grocer. Sometimes . there is a fifth, the person who collects from the farmers and ships to the commission merchant, but that is exceptional. I am not prepared to say at this time just what remedy is the proper one for this difference in prices. I believe that our association is decidedly in favor of in- creased terminal facilities for the handling of goods. Of course, we know what the conditions are to-day. We cannot, any of us, foresee just what conditions will be in time to come under different terminal facilities or different arrangements, but certainly there should be some improvement. I do not believe the carrying lines to-day have sufficient capacity for taking care of and making prompt delivery of all the goods that they receive. It depends naturally on the amount consumed. I think a large terminal in every borough, accessible to railroads with facilities for unloading all receipts and expeditiously and economically delivering them to the receiver, would improve conditions, providing that the goods can be placed on the market without any delay and practically all at the same time, so that there could be no discrimination. That would benefit matters. We do need more and better terminal facilities, there is no question about that. We sell goods on the pier. Whatever is unsold at the end of the market hours may be left on the pier or removed to our store. We are supposed to remove the goods from the pier within 48 hours. Naturally every receiver tries to dispose of all 228 his goods as fast as he possibly can. We do not pay any rent for space occupied on the pier. We try to have a minimum of five packages sold to any one purchaser. In some cases there are single packages sold. It depends on the kind of goods. Take New Orleans parsley, for instance. A man would not buy more than one or two barrels of that. It is a commodity that is used seldom and a buyer would not take more than one or two barrels where he cannot use five. You have to sell a com- modity of that sort in one or two barrel lots. But generally we try to confine our- selves to five or more packages. There are exceptions to every rule. In many instances two or three small retailers club together and buy larger quantities than they can individually use and then divide them up. Of course we use our own judgment in the matter of taking goods to our store from the docks if we wish to protect the goods and they are not going to get proper protection on the docks. Some of the transportation companies have frost-proof rooms to put lettuce and beans and other goods in to protect them from the weather. Under the present terminal facilities it would be practically impossible for the retailers to buy in any number from the receivers. They could not buy from them if they wanted to, because there is no room to go to the docks and get the goods. It is difficult to get at an accurate estimate of the difference between the price charged by the receiver and that at which the jobber disposes of his goods. The jobber may pay, we will say, $2 for his apples. They cost him 2S cents for cartage. He may figure 25 cents, but not over SO cents, profit a package. He pays 25 cents cartage, and, if he had to take them a considerable distance, he might have to pay more. If he had to take them to Harlem he would have to pay considerable cartage and, of course, he would add to that his profits. He has to figure the cost of cartage and the expense of his men in the purchasing of the goods and also take into considera- tion probable losses. I have known them to obtain no more than 25 cents above the price. That 25 cents includes the cartage also, so that he really gets an average of 19 cents. William H. Behrenberg, Produce Commission Merchant We handle all kinds of farm produce; the firm has been in the business about 45 years. Our specialties are apples, potatoes, onions, cabbage, and southern produce of all kinds. These commodities are shipped to us directly by the producers in most instances, especially from the south. Sometimes there are intermediate buyers between us and the producers. Wc have nothing like store door delivery in New York. The railroads deliver the goods at the piers and we take possession of them there. The conditions at these terminal delivery points are very much congested. The facilities are not adequate for the needs of the business. The terminal points at which we get our produce are: New York Central Pier 17, North River; Eastern Steamship Corporation at Pier 18; Erie Railroad Pier No. 20; Old Dominion Steamship Company Piers 25 and 26; Pennsylvania Railroad Piers 27, 28, and 29; Clyde Line Pier 26; Savannah Line Pier 35; and, of course, at all times the foreign steamship company piers that bring in imported potatoes; also at the Baltimore & Ohio Pier 22. In some seasons of the year we get stuflE from Communipaw and Hoboken. We have to go over there with our trucks and truck it back. We also truck from the Pennsylvania Railroad Jersey City yards. The receiv- ing points range from the Lehigh Valley Pier No 2, down near the Battery, up to the Clyde Line Pier 36 at Houston Street, and then the foreign business, lemons, etc., comes in from the Chelsea Piers up to Pier 44 at 44th Street. On the west side our salesmen will sell right at the piers. 229 On the goods we receive our cartage expense would average, I should think, about $300 a week the year round. That does not cover the cartage that is spent on goods we sell, because the buyer usually pays his own cartage. Our cartage bill must total something like $15,000 a year. The reason for the diflference between the wholesale and retail prices for the products here is that the methods are antique. There is too much wasted energy in bringing the goods from the receiving station in New York to the consumer. There are a great many delays in handling the goods. Naturally that adds to the price. There is also considerable injury to the quality of the goods by bad handling. Often buyers buy one package of stuff and they hold it at a price until the goods are sold. By reason of the heavy expense they are under they try to get a profit out of it regardless of market conditions. To-day, as low as onions are, for example — they are so low we cannot sell them at all — I will venture to say that the people supplying the consumers are asking as much as when onions sold for $4 a package. There must be a distributing point or a receiving point to distribute these goods from. I would strongly advise a union terminal and work out from that terminal to connect with the consumer — ^that is, get from that terminal to the supply station to reach the consumer. I think that one terminal in Manhattan would be better than a terminal in each borough. One terminal in Manhattan would lessen the cost of handling the goods. The more receiving points you have the more men are necessary. You have to have the same amount of help at each that you would have at the one union terminal. I think there would be room in the streets of lower Manhattan for the trucks that would have to come to that one point to get the goods. The Pennsylvania Railroad during the heavy receiving season receives as many as 420 cars in a day. Their capacity is only about 310 cars. Consequently the other 110 cars have to lie until the following morning before they can be delivered. If there were a union terminal sufficiently large to unload all the perishable products so that when the markets opened up in the morning each buyer and seller knew just how many cars were to be unloaded there and the market was established at that time, there would be an average fair price realized for the goods. I think that the consumer would get his goods cheaper through the union terminal than he would if the market were divided up into four or five terminals. Where the con- sumer should buy is at the small individual markets whose owners should come down to the union terminal to buy. Municipal retail markets throughout the city, I do not think, have been a success. I think that the small individual markets in every locality bring purchasers and con- sumers together and avoid the expense of a system of public markets. I think that the small retail markets buying directly from a union terminal would be a cheaper form of distribution. An equitable distribution could be worked out from the central market to a series of smaller jobbing markets, so that no one market in any one local- ity would receive more than a fair supply. I am in favor of private management of the small markets; It has been a success where it has been tried, and it is seldom that one hears any praise of the municipal markets. My idea is that the city should provide terminal facilities and then rent out the spaces to private individuals and those private individuals should run the market. I am opposed to have the city go into the buying and selling business. I do not believe in having any municipal facilities further than the receiving station. My idea is to get the thing to a central point. In the first place, that establishes a market quickly. You do not then have five different lines of prices that are estab- lished at five different markets. It is all established at one point. As far as cartage is concerned and hauling from this union terminal that is not a very great item. If we are carting to Harlem the cartage would probably be 10 or 12 cents a package. From any one of those terminals proposed for the different boroughs, no matter how 230 short the haul, it would be a matter of no less than six cents a package from any one terminal to the nearest point. Taking it as a whole, the cartage rate does not amount to a great deal. It is not a question of what you want done but a question of condition's that exist and will persist in existing. For instance, the Pennsylvania Railroad, which is receiv- ing more stuff than it can handle at its piers 27, 28, and 29. They receive there all their goods from the south. They have also a pier at Wallabout Market in Brooklyn where they will take the goods at the same rate. Yet, notwithstanding that, the Wallabout receivers do not want goods shipped over there, but want them sent to Piers 27, 28, and 29, for the simple reason that they want those goods at one place where they can come because the market is established there. It is simply a question of the establishment of a central market. The Pennsylvania Railroad spent $250,000 in providing a market on the Jersey side and told the New York trade that they' would in future deliver their goods to Jersey City; that they wotdd not deliver them at Pier 29 in New York. The trade said that they would not go to Jersey to handle them and the Pennsylvania tried it out for part of a season and then abandoned that $250,000 proposition and were glad to come back again to Pier 29. The point I want to bring out is this: by reason of the highly perishable nature of the stuff we handle it is necessary for it to come to a central given point where the market is established. I do not know of any human foresight or power that can establish a market It is just exactly the same as establishing a city. It is a matter of growth and of a great number of circumstances that no man can foresee. And, even though you build five different markets in the five boroughs, I will venture to say that three out of those five will not be used the way you expect them to be used, and that the trade will go to this central market which will be established of its own accord where the goods are received, and they must all, and will all, go to that point; and you will find that will be inadequate just the same as it is now, by reason of your dividing it up into five parts. And the sentiment of the trade will be to go to that point and they will do their buying there, and no power can prevent it, and three out of five terminals will hardly be used at all. The only necessary thing is to establish that central terminal in such a way that there will be no delay in getting the goods into the hands of the receivers and from the receivers into the hands of the consumers. That is the whole problem. For instance, take the berry market that is down here at Pier 29. We receive anywhere from 10 to 50 cars of berries of a morning in the season and the buyers, all of them, come to that one point, and if there are only ten cars the price of berries probably will be 20 cents a quart But, if we receive 30 cars, the price will drop to 5 cents a quart; and, if the next morning, there are SO cars, the price will go down to 3 cents a quart. Now, if you have your five locations, men will be afraid to get the cars in there because the central point will get most of the goods and establish the market. If you have a central market you will have but one price. If The Bronx people want to come there they will get the same prices as anyone else, and if the facilities are sufficient the deliveries will be practically all at the same time. If all the goods could be unloaded when the time comes for the opening of the market, the difficulty would disappear. Then everybody has the same chance and the market establishes itself right then and there. Refrigeration will obviate the depreciation of the long drives to deliver the goods. The salesmen go up to the dock every morning and they know how many carloads of perishable goods were on the market the day before. TKey know how the market cleaned up. If the market cleaned up quickly and the receipts are not too heavy the following morning, the buyer knows there is a chance that he can raise the market price a quarter, let us say. On the other hand, if the market cleaned up 231 draggy the day before and some of the goods were carried over and the receipts are very heavy, he knows that he must cut the price to move his commodity. So the salesmen go right on the dock and, without talking with any other salesmen, you can venture when the day's work is wound up that there is not very much difference between the selling price among the whole of them on the whole day's market. It comes natural to them. If you are bringing out the idea that there is a price fixed between them before they start in, there is no such thing in our busi- ness. It is a matter of getting all you can for the men that ship to you. I am in favor of a central market. We are bringing goods in here all the way from 3,000 to 10,000 miles away. The idea is to bring it to the one point in New York City, and, after having brought it there, to establish a market price on it, and distribute from that particular center to as many markets — whether individual or municipal, I don't care — as you wish. In that way you are going to deliver to your consumer cheaper than you can by having the jobbers' force increased and his expenses increased five times greater than they are to-day. With the market divided we would have to have five times as much help as we have to-day. The point I make is, if you have those five centers, you will find that most of the trade will go to one distributing point where the market is already established. Mr. Harry Dowie, Produce Commission Merchant Our firm sells butter, eggs, and poultry, and has been in the business 43 years. The value of poultry, butter, and eggs received in New York for annual con- sumption runs into the millions. These commodities are unloaded in New York at St. John's Park by the New York Central, Pennsylvania Dock, Erie, Dela- ware & Lackawanna, Lehigh Valley terminals, and by the various boats — Sound boats and Albany boats. The live chicken market is at West Washington Market. New York is a very large distributing place. A great deal of these goods are shipped direct from the dock to wherever they may be going — to many places in the east or abroad, to Panama, Porto Rico, Bermuda, and to many southern points. The distributing is done by the receivers generally. There are very few commission men that are not also wholesalers and jobbers. They trade in three capacities. The general expense of a commission man on an average commission man's business largely depends on the volume of business that he transacts. The larger the volume of business the less his proportionate expense. The general expenses of a commission man are risks of collecting his debts, in the first place, and his losses on advancements made, and that will run from two to three per cent. The costs of handling are, in the first. place, rent, in the next, help; in the next, if. you do a business of $2,000,000 a year, you. have to have a capital of $300,000 to $400,- 000. Then there is the interest on the money. There is the natural shrinkage which you can't save. This, is caused by various reasons. You may in good faith have sold goods and they may not have proved exactly as you expected they would be, and you have to make a calculation on that. No man can do any amount of business but what there is a shrinkage and a loss in his collections. Commission men may advance money on consignments and many times they do- not collect the shortage. We are not only receivers, but bankers as well. We advance on the bills of lading, and we are bankers for the men we sell to. I think the present handling facilities in New York are sufficient if the men engaged in business will do business properly. Some have too much business appe- tite — they grasp more than they can consume. Sometimes goods are held on the piers because they arrive before the bill of lading comes, and a man cannot get his 232 goods until he has his bill of lading. Sometimes men have an idea that the market is going to be better to-morrow, and they will let the goods lie on the piers. Some- times the men have not room enough to do the business that they ought to do, and the goods lie. Sometimes the goods are not up to the mark and there is a dispute between the receiver and the shipper and the goods lie until that dispute is settled. Sometimes the dispute is not settled for so long a time that the goods are put in storage by the railroad company. All that costs money. The commission man who pays the draft is the one that suffers; the shipper, as a rule, gets all the goods are worth before he ships them. There are very few delays owing to congested traffic since we have had the new police regulations. We used to have many hours' delay, but not lately. There is very little blocking on the piers. I believe we have the largest business in our line in the City of New York and we have no delays whatever, and, consequently, no damage to goods on this account. Our rush season is in the holiday times— Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's. That is the poultry season rush. At that time the railroad companies, instead of opening up at seven o'clock for us, open up at one or two o'clock at night and that gives us extra time, and at that time the streets are not congested in any way. There are times when the Hudson River Road instead of running the cars into St. John's Park will run them on the street and let you unload on the street until 2 o'clock. There is no congestion there. In the vegetable business I have seen a good deal of congestion along West Street in the early hours of the morning. The amount of receipts that go into the warehouses in the City of New York of food products outside of eggs is very nominal indeed. The other food products that would go into the freezers in the City of New York in any quantities would be poultry. Ninety-seven per cent, of the poultry in the United States is frozen outside of the City of New York. A large part of the eggs that New York takes are stored in Jersey City. This is for two reasons: in the first place, Jersey City freezers are all on railroad terminals. The eggs that are destined for New York City can be shipped right straight to those terminals. They are unloaded very easily without any breakage. They are stored at a much less expense than they can be stored in the City of New York because the ground that these buildings cover is not so expensive. The money invested in the buildings is not near as much as in New York. Insurance rates are much cheaper. The water that they have is everlasting; the water here is not. The refrigerators here have to continually bore deeper and deeper to get water and that is one of the most essential things. They use artesian wells here; there they draw it all from the river. A very large part of the produce taken into cold storage warehouses in New Jersey comes into New York. There are several purposes of refrigerating produce, but it all sums up in this— it is an absolute necessity to provide food at a reasonable price for the people to exist. It was not necessary 45 years ago; 45 years ago in Washington Market the matter of dressed poultry, for instance, would be cared for by the old-fashioned methods. In that time dressed poultry was supplied to New York by the women coming from Staten Island and New Jersey and they would have their dressed poultry in baskets distributed on the sidewalks. To-day we get hundreds and hun- dreds of carloads of dressed poultry from Texas, the Indian Territory, Kansas, Missouri, the Dakotas. We even get poultry from China and from Russia. Those supplies are absolutely necessary to us. What would we, as a people, do without refrigeration if we could not get those supplies? The cold storage charges vary a trifle. The man who can store several million pounds, or so many thousand cases of eggs, may get a special rate which is a trifle lower than the average rate. But the highest rate charged in the cold storage houses is less than you or I can hold those eggs in our own warehouse for. Where you 233 store solid carloads you get a little less rate of storage. It is less work and less trouble to handle 400 packages straight from one man than it would be to handle SO packages from 50 men. Refrigeration adds to the cost of produce from one-sixth to one-eighth of one per cent, per month. That would be one per cent, for six months. That is the average charge. Eggs are carried by the season — that is, from April to the 1st of January. They are carried for 40 cents a case, 30 dozen eggs to the case. That is a little over a cent a dozen. The great part of the produce that comes to New York is produced outside of the State of New York. What the State of New York produces would hardly feed the Astor House one day. The goods are shipped in by the "shippers" — men who are located at points where several railroads converge, if possible. They put up their plants there. Nowadays those are put up in accordance with the very latest sanitary regulations. They have their autos, trucks or wagons, and they have their men and their routes, and the men go around to the farmers — sometimes around to the merchants, who, in turn, deal directly with the farmers — and they gather the goods and bring them to the central point, where the plant is located. If it is live poultry the poultry is dressed at that point. After it is dressed it is properly cooled and properly packed. If it is eggs the eggs are candled and the "cracks" and the "dirties" and the "smalls" are thrown out and then they are placed in cases. If it is warm weather the eggs are placed in a cooler. When they have the car ready, which is from one to three days, it is brought up to the house and the car is thoroughly iced and salted so it is positively cool and the poultry and the eggs are placed in it. When the car is loaded this man gets his bill of lading — so many cases of eggs, so many pounds of poultry, so many pounds of butter — and he takes his bill of lading to the bank and he gets his money on his draft on his consignee, and we are the consignee. We pay the draft from three to five days before we see the goods. Our percentage of losses, however, is very small. We advise the shippers as to how much they can draw on the bills of lading, and the longer we are in business the more conservative we become. The particular percentage of advances varies, but we generally anticipate, providing we have to pay the freight, about 70 per cent. There are some shippers in the country on whom we do not place any limit because we have confidence in them. We meet their consignments to the full amount. There is a large business done in the City of New York by men here who own, or own part of these large packing houses in the West, so they are the men that produce the goods themselves very largely. There are a great many concerns here in New York who have no charge for cartage because their buildings are on the railroads. We have to meet the prices set by these competitors. Unless we did that, we could not continue in business. Our expenses to-day, compared with 30 years ago, are over 100 per cent, more, and our profits are less. We have to make up our profits by the volume of business we do. The unit of profit is very small. Our rate of commission is 5 per cent., but we do not earn that much. We have no arrangement with any shipper to sell any goods less than 5 per cent., yet there are very many times when we do not make S per cent. The market may be good to-day and low to-morrow. If we remit to the shipper on the price prevailing to-day, the rate might be 6 per cent, on the first day, but on the second day it might be 4 or less, so we would perhaps not get on an average 4 per cent, for our commission. I think it is true that a careful business man's losses would not be considered heavy at Yi of 1 per cent, a year. I think that would be a very careful business. I had the profit of the intermediate shipper figured out by one of the shrewdest business men in the West, who owns his own plants and has been in business thirty years. I had him figure up his profits for five years and I had the commission man 234 in New York figure up his profits for five years, and the entire net profits of both combined were not 5 per cent. I do not believe that lack of confidence between the shipper and the receiver has a tendency to increase the cost of marketing methods. I think the main reason for this cost is graft — graft by the chefs who want 5 to 10 per cent; graft by the agent, who has charge of the house where the lady of the household never sees the kitchen and depends upon the dealer or the servants to buy the goods, and the servant gets from 5 to 10 per cent., and because she does get a percentage or because the otherj man gets a percentage they dump the goods into the ash barrel and get more. I am speaking of what I know is true. The people themselves cause a great deal of the high prices. I remember when a man might have a little butcher shop that cost maybe $400 or $500 to fix up, and when he might have an old horse and cart and people were perfectly satisfied to have that come in front of their houses as long^as the meat was all right. Now, you have, to. have thousands of dollars invested in a beautiful butcher shop, and they cannot drive an old wagon in front of people's houses. Then, again, the methods of shopping have changed. A woman will telephone to her butcher for steak and then a little while after will find that she has forgotten the onions, and she will telephone again. That all costs money. I know it to be a fact that it costs some of these'butchers 30 per cent, to deliver their goods when it should not cost IS, and that is because of the. method of purchasing adopted by the women themselves. I think it would be an advantage to the trade if they allowed an extra percentage to the women who carried home their own purchases if you could get enough sensible women to accept it. But they are too proud to carry their own purchases home, and it is just the same with the men. HENRY DUNKAK, Produce Commission Merchant We deal in butter and eggs and have been in the business thirty years. We do a business of about $3,000,000 per annum. We secure eggs from the Western produce sections, bring them in and sell them, sending market agents out two or three times a year to make contracts. We buy from the producers, not from retail stores in the country villages, and also from collectors. We pay for them on sight drafts, bills of lading attached, and the goods are delivered to New York City. The usual method of receiving is that the goods are floated over and trucked out by hand trucks and put on the dock or pier. Our trucks go in and load up and haul them up to the store, where we have refrigeration, into which they are put as quickly as possible. There are undoubtedly many delays in carting shipments, due to the heavy receipts. At all piers the outgoing and incoming freight is handled at the same place and on the same days. We try to get the shipments off the piers as quickly as possible. Butter will stay on the piers from five to eight hours ; eggs, from one to two or three days. They are not refrigerated during that time, but the piers are covered. The goods, while in transit, are refrigerated in the cars. This method of liandling is, of course, detrimental. Our store is within one-half to two-thirds of a mile of all the piers, and all ouf trucks formerly, twelve years ago, would make eight or nine trips a day. They can now make but four and sometimes five, when the going is good, owing entirely to congested conditions at the piers. The double trucks cost us, on an average, about $10 a day. The effect of these delays on the butter and eggs is that they are detrimental to the quality and consequently detrimental to the value, as the bulk of the product ar- rives during hot weather, during which time they will become affected quickly when 235 left on the dock. When the streets are congested the delay there is also detrimental. Butter, on a truck in a temperature of 90 degrees in the sun, is more or less affected in quality before it can be placed in a properly protected place. I think the loss of butter and eggs in the City of New York from these causes is at least 1 per cent. That is very conservative. I think it is more than that. The butter trade of New York will be at least $60,000,000 a year. The egg trade would be as much again. The method of handling eggs, an especially fragile article, is also largely a cause of loss. Every time they are handled some eggs are broken, and whenever you get a broken egg in a case it also deteriorates all the eggs in the case packed with it. I think it would be a great advantage to the trade if there were terminal facilities so the refrigerated cars could go right into chilled rooms and be unloaded there. I think that is the proper way to do it. There is no sense in handling eggs coming into New York and going out of New York eight times. They are taken out of the cars and dumped on the pier; they are taken from the pier to the truck and from the truck into the store. There they are sold and put back again on the trucks and there taken down and unloaded on the pier, and from the pier they are loaded back into the cars. Then, of course, they have to be rehandled at the other end. I ascribe the great loss in value and in quantity to lack of proper terminal facili- ties. There certainly should be some method devised whereby it could be obviated. It would all result to the advantage of the consumer in the long run. I think we could overcome the loss if we had proper terminal facilities whereby the cars could come right into the market and be unloaded directly. Wherever there is a terminal market you will find the merchants gather about it. The volume of butter riding into this market will average from 50,000 to 60,000 tubs a week. Of course, at the time of maximum production, which is during the summer months, they run from 70,000 to 80,000 tubs a week, while in the winter months it will run down to 35,000 tubs a week. Eggs will average through the year from 100 to 150 thousand cases per week. During the time of maximum production, which is in April and May, the receipts run up to about 200,000 cases a week. We get our butter right from the creameries, the producers ; we get eggs from the collectors. Most of the butter is produced by cooperative creameries. They are usually combinations of a number of farmers and are cooperative companies. They elect a secretary and a treasurer and we make a contract with him. In cases where there is an egg territory there are men in that business buying the eggs from the individual farmers, and we buy from the collectors. GEORGE DEESSLERj Wholesale Commission Dealer, Wallabout Market I have been in the business for thirty-four years and do a business of about $500,000. I am familiar with business conditions in and around Wallabout Market. Five or six years ago, when I was president of the Wallabout Merchants' Associa- tion, we made considerable effort to get the city to establish a union terminal on a plot of ground 854 acres in extent. We went to see all the different railroads to find out whether they would be satisfied to cooperate with one another to bring cars in there and bring stuff to the market. Almost every representative of railroads we saw was anxious to cooperate in a proposition of that kind. We took the matter to the Comptroller, who has jurisdiction over all markets, and he was satisfied if a proposition of that kind could be arranged. We laid the matter before the Corpora- tion Counsel, and he, in his wisdom, advised the Comptroller that a railroad terminal was not "for market purposes." Under the conditions under which the land was conveyed to the city by the United States Government in 1895, this plot of ground 236 was to be used only for market purposes or business pertaining thereto. As the Cor- poration Counsel ruled that a railroad terminal would not be for market purposes, we could not have the terminal. When the City bought this property from the United States Government, they in- serted a clause in the deed that the City should dredge a canal to within 500 feet of Flushing Avenue and put in piers and slips and create a basin there. That has been done. The basin is about 400 feet wide and there are about five piers in the basin, leaving ISO feet between the head of the pier and the Clinton Avenue extension. This, fairway of ISO feet is not sufficient for the traffic I have had a great many com- munications about it, of which the following is a good example, to show the condi- tions that prevail: Mr. George Dressier, President, Wallabout Market Merchants' Association, Brooklyn, N. Y. Dear Sir: On December 11, 1912, the Schooner ■_ had to tie up out-, side at head of Clinton Avenue Pier, account of the whole Clinton Avenue exten- sion being covered with sand, gravel, broken stone, and an excavation dump and runway, also pile of wood, all of which was there without any permission from the Highway Department, and if said permit was granted by anyone connected with the Dock Department, they have certainly exceeded their authority. Through the efforts of the Dock Master in my behalf, the pile of wood was removed so as to allow me to unload the cargo of 3,6S7 sacks of potatoes. On December 19, 1912, the Schooner , with a cargo of 4,416 sacks and barrels of potatoes, remained a whole day outside of other boats at Clinton Ave- nue Pier for the same reason, at an expense of $20 per day. Again, on December 26, 1912, the Schooner , with 2,287 sacks of pota- toes on board, had to remain without a berth at the same pier for two days, at an expense of $10 a day. Will be pleased, to have you take this matter up and see if these annoyances cannot be eliminated. Those piers were built by the city for market purposes and for no other purposes. I made an application a considerable time ago to the Dock Master to get the privilege to have fruit and vegetables brought at certain times of the year.' The commissionef turned it down and would not grant the privilege, as under the restrictions placed on it by the United States Government, this pier cannot be leased and is for the use of transients. The market is peculiarly controlled. The Dock Department has control of the water front, the Comptroller has control of the market proper, and the Bureau of Public Buildings and Offices, the Borough President, has charge of the rest of the market. After considerable negotiations I got a lease to put up a row of buildings on the water front to be used for general purposes. Anybody in the market can come in there. I have the right to collect wharfage on boats coming in there, but for the three years that I have had the lease, I have not collected one penny of wharfage. I believe that the upbuilding of the market requires that the place should be there and I work accordingly. I believe Wallabout is the largest market in the United States. It covers about 36 acres. Seven-eighths of the market is built on by two-story brick buildings. We receive goods in the market on all the trunk lines — the New York Central, the West Shore, the Lehigh Valley, the Erie, the Baltimore and Ohio, the D. L. & W., and the Pennsylvania. They have car float connections. Besides that we have water- front connections with a basin alongside the car float terminal. There is a square in 237 the middle of the market for the market gardeners. They sell to the wholesaler *by private sale. There is no auction selling in the market. Most of the stuff coming in on the car float connections is consigned to individual concerns doing business in the market. They sell to wholesalers, jobbers, and retailers. I would recommend an enlargement of the market facilities by getting a lease of 200 or 250 feet along the Clinton Avenue extension. That would enable us to bring in car floats head on. A car float is 24 feet wide. We can bring in 12 cars on a float. The basin is about 400 feet long, and if we had space along the Clinton Avenue extension we could bring in ten times as many cars as can come now. We can only get in 12 cars a day now. They are kept on the float and handled on the float. There is no doubt that it would be an improvement to the market if we could run them off the floats directly into the market, but the number that we could handle would be limited as the switching space is not large. You have to have room for dead cars after they are unloaded. There is a space between the buildings and the water front of about 10 feet. Goods could be unloaded from the cars on hand-trucks and taken to either side of the market. In that way we could probably handle from 120 to 130 carloads a day there. As it is now they can only run in on one float sidewise. Such an arrangement would serve the district west of Washington Avenue and be a great accommodation to the district east. The. larger part of the trucking is now east of Washington Avenue. It would be difficult to bring cars across Washing- ton Avenue now, because the streets are not wide enough. We would have to tear down some buildings. Some of the streets are only 35 feet wide, so that a horse and truck backed in on each side of the street causes congestion of traffic. To bring cars to the center of the square it would be necessary to destroy a few of the buildings. The blocks of buildings vary from 200 to 250 feet in length and from 90 to 100 feet in depth. No doubt it would be of great benefit to the market if these cars were run off the floats across Fleeman Avenue, across Washington Avenue, and through the row of buildings between Washington Avenue and West Avenue to the center of the market. I do not think it would be a very costly proceeding. The buildings are two- story brick, and in themselves do not cost as much as the improvements inside. I have no doubt that it would pay the whole market to have these few destroyed for this purpose. The restrictions imposed by the United States Government prohibit anything being placed on the Clinton Avenue extension. The purpose was to keep the space vacant so that the Federal authorities could use it at any time. The City is bound to keep the space open, but, instead of its being kept open, there is a dump there and a run- way, and at times seven-eighths of the Qinton Avenue extension is littered with stone, gravel, and sand. The streets of the market are paved with cobblestones. The pavement is old and has been there for years. The buildings are built by individuals who lease the ground. The only public building is for the janitor, and this also has a meeting room for the Market Association. There is no place for auction sales or anything of the sort. RETAILING JOHN STEENECK, Retail Grocer, Manhattan I have been in the grocery business twenty-three years. In that time I have dealt in perishable products as well as dry groceries. Up to two years ago 60 per cent, of my sales were in perishable goods ; now, the percentage is about 40. My business last year was over $35,000. The quantity of perishable goods that I handle has fallen off 238 because I am getting too old and it was too strenuous for me to handle it in the proper way. In order to carry it on successfully I would have to attend the receivers' sales and the farmers' market. The receivers are generally between Dey and Harri- son Streets, between West and Greenwich Streets. I have to go to different receivers for different lines of goods, and to the farmers' market for still other lines. I have to go to all these different places at a most inconvenient time — from four o'clock in the morning to half-past seven, and have to visit in the neighborhood of about six or seven different receivers, and sometimes as many as twenty in order to get the goods I need. The farmers' market, Gansevoort Market, is about a mile and a half to two miles from where the receivers are located. I could go to a central buyer and get the various things I require, but the profits would be curtailed — I could not buy at the same price. I would have to buy from persons who had already collected their goods from the receivers and from the farm- ers, and who, therefore, would add a profit that would have to be charged to me. I would have to pay them a certain amount for buying for me. I think the prices of perishable goods have not increased. The only difference to-day is that probably people at the present day are higher livers and demand a better class of goods than heretofore. What people used to be satisfied with twenty years ago they would throw aside now. What we formerly used to consider luxuries have now become necessities. I think during the past fifteen years that prices have risen to a certain extent because of the increased cost in labor. In former times the farmer used to hire these men for $10 and $15 a month, but now he pays them $25 a month and board — that is, the truck gardeners. The price of the product had to rise because of the increased cost of the labor that goes into it. If we could get goods at first hand at one place it would be much easier and much cheaper, and a great deal of time would be saved. Now, there is an immense amount of time lost which, of course, costs money. I could afford to stay in the business then because it would not be so strenuous. The prices would be about the same. If we could get the goods more easily it would have a tendency to keep the young men of the city in the grocery business instead, as at the present time, of their being forced to go into some other kind of work. They absolutely refuse to do that work now, because of the labor. I do not think it would induce the farmers to send more goods in, because they send all their goods in now. The grocery business in New York is conducted as well as it might be, except that they have not the proper market facilities to get the products in time without great effort. They ought to have a larger farmers' market where the wagons would not be so congested, and they ought to have a large terminal where the commission merchants would be all in one place and the products would be sent, which would enable the retailei' to get his products at first cost, that is, from the commission dealer himself. One such market would not do for the entire City; each borough should have one. It would most tindoubtedly save hauling. It is my opinion that the retail grocery business would be benefited if we had these diflferent terminal markets. I am not in favor of municipal retail markets. It is impossible to get 'them to be run economically and as well as private markets are now run by individuals. I would rather have such markets than the peddlers on the streets, but I do not think the markets would last very long. I would not take a stall in a municipal retail mar- ket as a gift, because it would not be a success. I would not have any customers. Customers will not go out of their way to buy goods. If I were to deal in perishable goods now, I would have to go to work at four o'clock in the morning and keep my store open until eight or nine at night. If I could get the goods directly at one market I would not need to do a day's labor before other people get up in the morning. It would be an inducement for me to stay ii» the retail business for the sale of perishable goods. 239 If the wholesale terminal markets were established under favorable conditions, I and other dealers could sell more of this line of goods than we do now. That would increase the market for the farmers, and that in turn would induce the farmers to produce and send in more goods, which would have a tendency to lower prices. At the same time the farmer would get better returns. I buy by the package — five, ten, or twenty-five at a time. All grocery men cannot do it: they are not strong enough. I, of course, bought at the dock. If facilities to buy directly at the dock in one, two, or three packages were provided, it would re- duce the cost to grocers if they had the dock large enough. It should be near the farmers' market, too. The whole market ought to be at the same place. Of course, during certain times of the year, it does not matter so much. Grocery men come down twice a week to the commission dealers in the winter time. Then we do not need a market every day. And, the other day, they go to the Harlem Market and buy of the farmers there. But in the summer time we cannot do that. These goods come to the market in large lots and are bought up by the whole- salers and by them regraded. In order to have the goods properly graded to meet the requirements of trade, there has to be a middleman to take care of them, and it takes time and money. You never can get rid of the middleman. I am positive that the perishable goods are sold on a more scientific basis to-day than ever sold heretofore. There is keener and closer competition by all men handling that business. There is no such thing as a high cost of living — it is the cost of high living. That is, people are living better and in better houses, and are being better clothed and better fed than ever before. With our railroad facilities and ability to get goods here from all over the world, we get them cheap in comparison. If we had better handling facilities we could distribute the goods more cheaply, and I am satisfied that you would have better men in the grocery business. GEORGE STADTLANDER, Retail Grocer, Manhattan I have two stores and have been in business about seventeen years. I have served as Chairman of the Retail Grocers' Association. I dealt in perishable goodSj^onstitut- ing about 35 per cent, of my trade, up until within the last three years, but^gave it up because the work was too hard. The hours were long, as it was necessary to get up early in the morning and keep open late at night, and the work of handling green goods is difficult. One has to get up at three or four o'clock in the morning, and then at seven or eight o'clock at night, when every other man is through for the day the stuff has to be packed away nicely so as to preserve it for the next day. I principally dealt in Gansevoort Market, although I tried for years to buy directly from the docks. I found that, however, almost impossible. Sometimes I would go down at one or two o'clock in the morning and get back at my store at six, with only part of my goods bought right. I finally decided that life was too short and there was not enough in it. I still sell fresh fruit, however. To get my supply of perish- able goods I stopped at from ten to twelve places in Gansevoort Market, from com- mission merchants to farmers and speculators, and then once a week I would go to the commission merchants downtown and buy merchandise, such goods as I could buy and keep three days or a week and that would not spoil. I do not think that the price of perishable goods has increased much in New York in the last ten or fifteen years. There has been an increase in real prime stuff. At the present time, consumers demand a grade of goods that is very far superior to the ordinary goods that formerly were considered good eiiough. The consumer to-day buys ten cents' worth of apples and wants eveiy apple perfect. There are apples 240 rotting on the ground in the country, but we could not get twenty-five cents a barrel for them shipped in to us. In the country they will go into the garden, pick a basket of apples, peel them, cut out the worm spots and specks, and then turn them into good apple sauce, but you cannot get them to do that here in New York. We certainly have difficulty in getting prime goods from the farmers. I was hardly ever able to get them from the farmers because, in spite of my being early in the morning, there were in-between men there before me, commission merchants, and dealers. They were always there before me and had the selection of the farmers' goods picked. I could go to a farmer and buy beans at $1 a bag, but the dealers would want $1.50, and they had the choice thing and if I wanted the choice I had to pay the price. Apples are graded by the commission merchants generally. I believe they send their own men to the country, who pack them there. To tell the truth, I would not buy apples from a commission merchant if I were not told that his own men packed them, because I would not trust the farmers. When they are packing their apples in the country they will put a stove pipe in the middle of the barrel. They will fill the sides with good stuff, but in the middle, down the stove pipe, they will dump all their bad stuff. Then they pull out the stove pipe and there you are. As a conse- quence, the up-to-date commission merchant sends his own men to the country now, who do the packing of their own products. They then mark very plainly the packages, X, XX, XXX, or XXXX, as the case may be, indicating the quality of the product. I think it would be an excellent plan for the farmers to have an association whereby they could guarantee whatever produce they send to market. I think there would be a feeling of better security and the result would be better all round. Of course, there are individual farmers whose goods are well known and from whom purchases are made without any question. There are many such. Confidence in the seller induces the buyer to buy without any question. If goods were guaranteed by some cooperative association of farmers, that would help ; and if we had two or three grades, and goods were graded by competent and honest men, we would know just what to do. To improve market conditions here, I think Manhattan ought to have one market at least twice the size of the present Gansevoort Market, with wide streets where the farmers could drive in and stand comfortably, and where the buyers, such as grocers and peddlers, could drive in conveniently and go up to their wagons and buy their goods without blocking traffic and being delayed. And I believe The Bronx ought to have one or two such and I think we ought to have another market at 18Sth Street along Washington Heights. I think these should be wholesale markets. I should not object to there being a retail department where the farmers could sell their stuff. If retailers could get their goods more cheaply they could sell more cheaply. The selling price is determined by the buying price. That works quickly and entirely automatically. If the grocers could get their supplies more directly and at one place and more cheaply, I think they would sell more goods than they do now, and I believe they would take more interest in it. That would increase the demand and would induce the farmers to send more goods in. And if the farmer could come into closer con- tact with the buyer direct, I mean the retail grocer, he would be more pleased. I do not think any means can be devised whereby the middleman can be cut out. He pro- vides supplies for the market from abroad when a shortage is threatened. That is one of the necessities of the business about which the public knows nothing. There is no question but that the people on the farms get careless in packing and shipping their goods. You must have some middleman who will take charge of that detail and watch the product and see that it is perfectly fresh and in proper condition. Without such a middleman the result is apt to be bad. I do not think municipal retail piarkets located by the city in various sections are 241 advisable. They might be made a success, but I cannot see any reason why they should be made a success. There is no way of distributing food products better than what is done now. The retail grocer in the business now does not make a great fortune. Only 5 per cent, of the retail grocers survive the strain and stay in the busi- ness. The systems of chain stores have a central or distributing station. They buy in large lots in the various markets and send the goods around to the smaller stations throughout the city. I am just opening up a chain of stores. Just as soon as a store does not make a profit I close it up. I do not own the stores, I rent them. I do not think that such a chain of stores could possibly be operated by the city successfully. Forty per cent, of the retail grocer's business is in butter, eggs, and sugar. Those commodities produce a profit of from 4 to 7 per cent. A retail grocer who delivers must make from IS to 16 per cent, in order to continue doing business. It costs me, in my chain of stores, about 11 to 12 per cent, to do business. The result is I have made about 3 per cent, clear profit, and that is not any too much. The city could not do business as cheaply as that; it would cost them 35 per cent. We have to figure very closely to make anything. If the retailer could get his goods directly from the wholesale terminal he could sell more economically than he does now, and more economically than either the municipal retail markets rented out to stall holders, or a municipal chain of markets, because there would be more competition among the individual merchants after the trade. I do not think it would be a good plan to have all the market places in New York concentrated in the hands of one association of producers and consumers, be- cause it would cut out all competition. I think a railroad terminal is necessary as well as a farmers' market. Both should be in one spot. Some of the consumers in New York are very unreasonable. They think, intelli- gent people, too — that because the sun shines one day out of two, or because it rains one day out of sixty sunny days, that salads ought to be cheaper. They do not realize that seasons vary and that some seasons are very poor for the production of different kinds of salads. They do not seem to realize that a long dry season will have a very bad effect upon the quality of the goods, but think that if it happens to rain one day that is sufficient to cure all the trouble that has been caused by the long dry season. Then, again, many people have charge accounts in retail grocery stores. In the very early season, long before the local markets are producing anything, produce from the far Southern states is brought in and it naturally brings high prices. People order goods and never ask the price, and we would not tell them the price because, if we did, they would feel insulted. Then, about a month later, they get their itemized bills. By that time the produce is cheap. They look at the bill and they say, "That grocer is robbing us." Then they go to another store. CHARLES HASLOP, Retail Grocer, Manhattan I have been in the retail grocery business about twenty-five years, and do a busi- ness of about $25,000 a year. About 40 per cent, of my trade is in perishable goods. In the last ten years the price of perishable goods has risen and fallen. Of course, when goods are scarce in any line, the prices will naturally stiffen up. Speculators under such conditions can often get in and control the market, but when goods are plentiful they cannot do that — the matter is determined by supply and demand. I do all my marketing from Gansevoort Market to West 14th Street. You cannot buy all in one place. I go around and see as many farmers as I can until satisfied that I have the right goods. Then I go into Washington Street from 12th to 14th 242 Streets and there are some direct receivers there. I buy oranges from a wholesaler; potatoes and turnips I buy from receivers; green vegetables I buy directly from the farmers. I suppose it would facilitate my work if all these people could be found in one market. If we had the railroads, such as the New York Central and the Lehigh Valley coming into one big central place, it would help. I get my turnips and potatoes at the New York Central yards and get them a little lower than downtown. But the people downtown who rehandle the stuif do not overcharge. They just charge a nor- mal profit for handling. In the railroad yard you are never sure of getting the same grade of goods twice ; you have to take a chance. If a Farmers' Association were formed up-state to grade its goods and guarantee them, it would create confidence and would also eliminate a great deal of waste. The creation of confidence and the improvement in the condition of the product always tend to facilitate trade. If the farmer were satisfied that the full quantity of goods he raised could be sold at ii fair price, he would raise as much as possible. That would bring more goods into the market and would have a tendency to reduce prices. It would also reduce the trouble and worry of the retail dealer in getting his goods. Weather conditions and congestion on the docks often give receivers and whole- salers difficulty in getting their goods into the market. They send trucks down to the different piers for berries, for instance, and have to cart them from down below Harrison Street to Gansevoort Market There occurs a delay of an hour or two hours. Each truck has to take its turn ; they have to check the packages on the dock and, of course, there are a great many trucks. All that adds to the cost If all the stuff could be run right into one market where all that delay might be obviated and that cost eliminated I think it would be much better. I have considered municipal retail markets located around the city in various places and rented out to stall holders, and I do not think they are economical. I do not think that goods would be any cheaper in them than they are to-day. How can you expect to get anyone to work as the retailer works now, who has his entire fortune at stake ? He works fourteen or fifteen hours a day, always striving to eliminate that extra cost, and he has to compete with all the other retailers. There is very close and keen competition, and he has to take many chances. Much harm is done by the untruthful statements printed in the newspapers. I saw in the Times the other day that there could be gotten 75 quarts of apples out of one barrel. That is not true. I get about 35, if you figure dry measure. I live in a neighborhood populated by middle-class people; perhaps some stores do not have to give as good measure as I have to give. I use a 4-pound bag and fill it for a quart. A barrel of potatoes is supposed to weigh 180 pounds. I give 4 pounds of potatoei to a quart ; I fill a 4-pound bag — ^it may be one-quarter of a pound, more or less, than 4 pounds. Now, you divide 160 pounds by 4 and you have 40 quarts. I am figuring 20 pounds less out of that barrel of potatoes because of waste. You will always find that there is a lot of dirt and other cause of waste in a barrel. WALTER J. BECEj Dealer in Meat and Poultry, Fruit, and Vegetables, in Washington Market Our firm has been in business for thirty-five years, catering to private families uptown and the downtown restaurant trade. From April to September we handle from $5,000 to $7,000 worth of fruit. From September until March our sales of vegetables amount to $6,000 to $7,000 a month. The value of the poultry we sell is about one-third that of the vegetables. I deliver to my customers and make no extra charge. 243 Stuff shipped into New York comes no farther than the terminal unless sent by express. The conditions at our delivery points are very poor. The commission men pay the transportation charges on their commodities and are allotted space on the piers, for which they pay nothing additional. They have the use of it during certain hours for the transaction of their business. The foreman in charge of the pier designates the amount of space needed for a load of stuff. Some commission men take their goods right to their stores, but the majority of the stuff is sold on the dock. The retail grocer usually buys from a second commission man and takes away his own goods. There is practically no handling of the goods by the commission, man except loading them onto the second man's truck. If more stuff comes in than the day's trade will take, some docks are large enough to carry it over, and on others it has to be sold off at low prices. The New York Central Dock at Barclay Street is large enough to carry it over; at Desbrosses Street the stuff has to be sold by 3 o'clock; spinach coming in in the winter at the Old Dominion Dock has to be sold by 8 or 9 o'clock in the morning because they need the room for other freight There is always a big demand in New York Qty for good stuff. The best stuff brings the highest price early in the morning. A large retail dealer usually maintains a buyer, who does nothing but buy. Some Italian dealers form small companies of five or six dealers, who employ one man to buy for them and distribute to them. I have to visit seven or eight points of delivery to get supplies, but these are all in one district. The stuflf comes from dififerent points and at different hours. Very few stores need more than two buyers, and it is seldom they have two. Owing to congestion there is delay in getting the- stu£F o& the docks. Some dealers' trucks get in line at 8 o'clock at night to take a delivery away at 1 in the morning; then, some- times they have been known to wait from 1 imtil S in the morning before they could get down to the pier and back with a load. That, of course, is a trucking delay and does not keep the buyer. The piers open at dififerent hours : the Barclay Street Dock opens at 7 o'clock, the Old Dominion Line Pier at a quarter to 5, and the Pennsylvania at 5, so that there is time to get to all of them. When a buyer goes to the dock he views the stuff dis- played and buys a certain number of packages, and the man gives him a slip calling for his purchase. This slip he gives to the driver. As far as he himself is concerned, he is through. He then goes and attends to the rest of his buying, which is done in the same way. The driver goes on the dock and loads the stufif there. They charge one cent to load the package on the wagon. That is the way the thing works out practically. On a commodity like string beans the retail price is from IS to 20 per cent, in advance of the wholesale price, or from 25 to SO cents a package worth from $2.75 to $4.00, and containing from 20 to 25 pounds. I do not think the advance is more than that because competition is so keen to-day that it cannot be made more. If we can make 75 cents to a dollar for retailing out 20 pounds of beans, we think we are doing well. We generally figure 3 to 5 cents advance on a quart on an article of that kind. From my observation I am of the opinion that the farmer was never better off than he is to-day, and the pubUc are getting their stufif as cheap, I think, as they ever did. WILLIAM LITCHENFELS, Retail Grocer, The Bronx I have been in the business thirteen years and am familiar with the condition of the grocery trade in The Bronx. Of the perishable goods, I handle chiefly potatoes, and now, during the fall and winter, oranges and lemons. The men who handle other perishable goods have to go to the Harlem Market. The potatoes come down 244 on the New York, New Haven and Hartford to the Harlem River Station. We buy them right out of the cars. For other things we go to the Harlem Market, at 102nd Street and First Avenue, to which the produce is trucked up from downtown. It is an intermediate station. All of the grocers in The Bronx go to the Harlem Market; some of them even go down to Washington Market, a distance of about 10 or 12 miles. I do not think we get our perishable goods in The Bronx as cheaply as we ought to. The only way to change it, that I can see, is to open a market — open a big wholesale market and let everybody come in, so that the retailers can go there and get their stuff. That is the only way. Naturally a market where all railroads came in would be better than a market where only one railroad came in. So far as I know, there are no farmers' trucks coming into The Bronx now, though there used to be in the Port Morris Market. All the supplies are brought in from the Harlem Market or the West Washington Market, with the exception of the small supplies brought in by railroads and sold out of the cars. The prices in The Bronx are naturally higher because you have to charge for cartage. I do not know just why the Port Morris Market was discontinued. Probably not enough farmers came to it, and the variety of goods handled there did not satisfy the retail grocers and the Italians who handled the vegetables. The variety there was not sufficient, and so they were obliged to come downtown. That is the reason people go to the Harlem Market now instead of patronizing one or two merchants now in The Bronx who are trying to do business with the fruit and perishable goods men there. The larger the market the greater the variety. Another disadvantage of the Port Morris Market was that it took about as long to drive there as to drive to the Harlem Market, where there was much greater variety. Also, in such a place, you are always sure of a market value because people go to shop there. The greater the variety supplied the better the chance is to trade. A little market is always under a handicap. During the summer months I send my driver down to the Old Dominion Line to buy new potatoes, down at Rector Street. He goes on the dock there and buys new potatoes by the barrel. That is a drive of about 20 miles. It takes about two hours to go down and longer to drive back with a load, and often he has to wait. I have not considered seriously retail markets spread around through the city under the control of the city. So far as The Bronx is concerned, I think one large wholesale market would better conditions. PETER A. PECKICH, Retail Grocer, The Bronx I handle dry groceries and potatoes. I carried green groceries about five years ago, but cannot do it now because I cannot go down to the market and get the goods. I would lose half a day buying the stuff and could not attend to my other business. I have to sublet my storefront to an Italian, and he sells that kind of goods. The man I have goes down during the summer to Washington Market from 169th Street. He makes a special trip for berries and things of that sort. He has a horse and starts in the evening about 10 o'clock and is back about 10 o'clock the next morning, spending the night down at the market. There aren't any markets around The Bronx where one can get these things. I drove down to the Port Morris Market once, when I handled that stuff, but I found I was losing time going there because it was such a long way and was so hilly that I could not go there as quickly as I could to 101st Street, to the Harlem Market Then, they had goods there only during the seasons when the Long Island 245 farmers grew them. The rest of the year they had nothing. That was one great trouble. I could not get all I wanted there and the driving was more out of the way than going to the Harlem Market. The prices of green vegetables in The Bronx are very high. I think we ought to have a wholesale market up there where we can get them in quantities so it would reduce the prices. The bigger the market the greater the variety. If we had more railroads we would get the goods from all directions, at all times of the year. We would then have a bigger variety and a steadier trade. TRUCKING GEORGE STAMBERGER, Truckman Chairman of the Executive Committee and Chairman of the Market Truckman's Association I have been in the trucking business since 1888. I have eight trucks — two double and six single trucks, and truck vegetables and fruit, eggs, poultry, butter, and cheese. I operate on the West Side from Canal Street to the Lehigh Valley, and on the East Side from Pier 8 to Pier SO, trucking for George J. Ziegler and Company, deal- ing in produce and fruits, Beyer Brothers' Commission Company, dealing in butter, eggs, and poultry, and Gleason and Wendt. I make my agreements directly with the people I do work for. The rate is by the package and depends upon the distance. The charges are different for different zones — such as Canal Street to 14th Street, 14th Street to Harlem Market, to Walla- bout Market in Brooklyn, etc. The rate also varies according to the size of the package Cetrried. Outside of the zones mentioned in the published rates of the Market Truckman's Association, any trucking is by private agreement. My trucking is all done by horse truck, the crew of a double truck consisting of one driver and two horses. There is no helper on the truck, but on all the piers we have loaders. The boss carman pays the loaders on the piers. The loading rate is 75 cents per hundred for small packages and $1 for barrels, whether it is spinach or cabbage or something else. Sometimes we have to pay a cent and a half on potatoes. The drivers do not load. We truck from the piers to the stores, or to terminals for outgoing shipment, ac- cording to orders. The receiver usually hires us and pays the trucking fees and we run weekly accounts. The rates are fixed so that we may have a general cartage. They are based upon the united experience of the truckmen and the trade they serve as to what would be a fair return for the trucking done under the present circumstances. Some- times there is a good deal of delay at the terminals in getting perishable goods. In the summer time, when they have delivery at 1 a. m., we have to get the trucks there anywhere from 6 to 10 o'clock at night so that we can get our goods out early enough for the firms we do trucking for to make their express shipments. I figure that I have to get $7 on a single and $10 a day on a double truck before I can commence to make a profit. Twelve hours constitutes a day's work and we charge 30 cents an hour for all time over that. The rates are based on the fact that we have to submit to delays. Because of the delay the truck is thrown out of work for part of the time and therefore we can carry a less number of parcels than we otherwise could, and must charge more on each parcel and that has a tendency to increase the cost of the goods. We have the delay all along the river. In the morning, on all the railroad piers, they do not handle their outbound freight until 246 the inbound is all unloaded and, in the meantime, the accumulation is so that when we send a truck down there at 10 or 11 in the morning we do not get it back until 2 or 3 in the afternoon. Goods are all piled up there sd that you cannot unload. Of course, in the summer, when the sun gets on the goods, they are bound to be in- jured in some degree. So far as our line is concerned, rebating is stopped. The congestion of outgoing freight tends to drive the out-of-town trade to other cities. Years ago, I sent, in butter season, anywhere from 10 to 25 loads to the depot for one concern, and at the present time those people do not have enough for their own wagons. If the facilities were better, so that we did not have these delays, we could charge a less rate and make just as much money as now. The less handling goods have the less will be their cost. If we could decrease the charges on goods, probably more would come in and they would therefore be cheaper. The truckmen would have more to handle, so they would suffer no harm; the farmer would not be harmed; nor would the consumer, because he would get his goods cheaper. M. C. MICHAEL, Truckman Secretary of the Market Truckmen's Association My business is to keep my employers out of diiEculties in gathering freight at the piers and shipping it, and once in a while have a little excitement with the traffic regulations and the labor organizations. The schedule of trucking rates is made up in an equitable manner between the commission merchants and the carmen. They are based on the performance of the truck, cost of maintenance, etc. A double truck costs about $450, and is supposed to last three years. The driver is paid $3 a day for 12 hours a day from the time he leaves the stable, and 30 cents an hour for each hour overtime, six days in the week. The summer time is the busy season. The average wage of a man driving a team is about $24 or $26. A pair of horses costs from $600 to $750. A man should average from $8 to $10 a day for a double truck and $7 for a single truck before he begins to make a profit The object of the formation of our Association was to cut out the rebates. We make that cartage rate as low as we possibly can with protection to ourselves. We think we have succeeded in cutting out rebates as far as the New York commission men are concerned. Some shipping houses with representatives here still collect what is in effect a rebate in the form of a "dock cartage," which they charge for the priv- ilege of going on the dock and moving the stuff. We find the railroad terminals so congested that oftentimes a man can only ride one load where he should ride three. In the forenoon the delays are one to two hours, as a rule, which, as the truck costs about $9 a day, may be figured as a loss of 75 cents an hour. Sometimes there is a delay of half a day. We have to charge an average rate which will cover all these things. It is a great disadvantage to the trade to have these delays. REFRIGERATION FRANK A. HORNE, President, Merchants' Refrigerating Company The Merchants' Refrigerating Company operates cold storage warehouses for the storage of food products and other goods under refrigeration. Our houses in New York City are located at Nos. 22 to 32 Beach Street, Nos. 27 to 37 North Moore 24; Street, Nos. 161 to 163 Chambers Street, Nos. 141 to 149 Reade Street, Nos. 148 to 152 Reade Street, No. 92 Warren Street, Nos. 11 to 79 Hudson Street, Nos. 3 to 11, 14 and 16 Harrison Street, No. 179 Franklin Street, and No. 19S Franklin Street; we also have warehouses at Warren and First Streets, Jersey City, and at Nos. 41 to 47 River Street, Newark. In our New York City houses we have a capacity of 3,694,141 cubic feet of refrigeration, and in the Jersey City house 3,500,000 cubic feet Our investment in real estate and equipment in this city is a little over a million and a half. The following statement indicates the goods we handled between February 1, 1912, and February 1, 1913: N. Y. houses. Jersey City. Both. Eggs (cases) 186,519 427,645 614,164 Butter Packages) 84,369 72,595 156,964 Cheese (boxes) 103,998 1,507 105,505 Poultry (packages) 96,337 133,767 203,104 Meats (packages and pieces) 8,521 23,136 31,657 Dried fruits (packages) 327,325 11,027 338,352 Nuts (packages) 127,849 1,007 128,856 Grape fruit (barrels) 29,957 34,922 64,897 Grape fruit (boxes) 88,124 144,903 233,027 Various (packages) 122,835 69,274 192,109 Total 1,175,834 917,783 2,095,617 The maximum holdings, with the dates, are as follows: New York houses. Jersey City. Both. Eggs (cases) 7/19 154,430 8/2 408,459 8/2 562,404 (30 doz. cases) Butter (packages) 8/30 65,229 8/31 71,533 8/30 136,777 (60 Avg. No.) Cheese (boxes) 9/14 55,027 7/29 1,200 9/14 56,050 (45 No.) Poultry (packages) 1/29 40,466 1/17 70,303 1/17 109,976 (65 Avg. No.) Meats (packages and pieces) 9/23 2,485 12/28 12,299 12/28 14,159 (55 Avg. No.) Dried fruits (packages) 5/28 222,180 7/1 6,984 5/28 226,832 (40 Avg. No.) Nuts (packages) 6/12 91,033 8/12 794 6/12 91,611 (70 Avg. No.) Grape fruit (barrels) 11/21 23,404 12/1 33,812 11/29 56,226 Grape fruit (boxes) 12/7 59,311 12/23 81,670 12/19 136,203 Various 8/26 46,350 9/21 17,810 8/30 59,662 Goods stored with us are owned by local merchants, commission merchants, job- bers, wholesale grocers, and also by Western shippers and dealers in these products. We do not own these goods ourselves. We have warehouses and store for hire only. In some cases we make advances on the goods stored; as an average percentage of loans we figure 75 per cent. In some cases it ranges from SO to 75 per cent. In my experience of twenty-five years I have not noticed any effort or tendency to corner products stored. These goods are held by merchants all over the country and they are in competition with each other. Our buildings would not be sufficient to hold in sufficient quantities products to constitute a corner. I have made a study of methods affecting the number and diversity of the owners of products in cold storage, and would like to offer a statement that may throw some light on the subject The public cold storage warehouse men do not own directly or indirectly the goods stored, and their customers number many thousands of independent pro- 248 ducers, shippers, commission merchants, and dealers in the products stored, repre- senting every section of the country. There never has been and could not be any combination or control whatever to regulate supplies and prices or produce a corner in these articles. The maximum quantity of goods in storage during 1910, according to the reports of twenty-seven warehouses, is as follows : Eggs 2,088,401 cases, 30 dozen to the case. Butter 56,802,158 pounds. Meats 30,169,252 pounds. Poultry and game 28,379,136 pounds. Fish 23,369,967 pounds. The number of storers was 9,380. It should also be borne in mind that, of the storers, many are commission merchants, each of whom represents a large number of shippers and owners of the products stored. There were thirty-nine states repre- sented. The number of customers of the Merchants' Refrigerating Company of New York and New Jersey, which is typical of the large storage concerns, is, for New York, representing 23 states, 992 customers; for New Jersey, representing 19 states, 450. As to the eflfect of cold storage on prices, the prices are governed by the trade law of supply and demand, which is operative as to stored goods as well as to other merchandise, and a study of market prices will demonstrate this fact. Cold storage facilities stimulate production, increase the volume of perishable goods, extend the period of consumption, and result in lower average prices to the public. As to the effect of cold storage on health, it is certainly not detrimental. The modem cold storage warehouse has reached a high state of scientific development, and the sanitary, physical, and thermal conditions are, as they should be, of the highest order. The most rigid inspection and supervision would be welcome. The quality of the goods in the warehouses depends upon their condition when placed in storage rather than upon the length of time the goods are carried. We therefore favor supervisory regulation and inspection before the goods are received in cold storage. As a matter of fact the goods offered for storage are generally of the best quality and condition, as it is commercially unprofitable to store other kinds. Such goods may be carried in a wholesome state, as determined by scientific experi- ment and practical expert knowledge at least from one season to the next, twelve months later. Time limits arbitrarily imposed would be absolutely destructive of the cold storage industry and gravely affect and restrict, and in some cases practically wipe out the industries that patronize cold storage houses. It is estimated that the investment in public cold storage warehouses that store for hire in the open market is over $75,- 000,000. The flush period of greatest production comes but once a year. With no possibility of carrjring the goods to the time of scarcity the function of the cold storage warehouse men would be entirely eliminated. The business could not exist on mere temporary preservation. At present large quantities are carried for from eight to twelve months. If the time were very much limited, goods would not be stored for the short period and, even if they were, the houses would be practically empty three-quarters of the time, which would destroy the business. The largest quantities are kept from six to ten months, but considerable quantities are held up to twelve months and frequently longer. It is not customary to carry goods longer than twelve months except under unusual conditions. It is not true that deliveries are made "from the bottom of the pile." This is evidenced by the large number of withdrawals of goods stored for only one or two months. In the case of eggs, those 249 stored in July are often removed in large quantities in two or three months, while the goods stored in April or May remain in store from six to ten months. Any provision prohibiting restorage of goods in cold storage would be entirely inimical to the public interest and at variance with the best known methods of handling perishable products in order to keep them in proper condition for the market. It has been suggested to prohibit goods that have been in temporary cold storage during accumulation or in the process of pre-cooling from being subsequently stored at big centers after transportation in refrigerator cars. Also to prevent the transfer of goods from one cold storage warehouse to another in a different city under proper conditions, while permitting goods not protected to be handled under adverse condi- tions, exposing them to higher temperature. It was also suggested to prohibit re- storage of goods that have been frozen and carried for a period near the point of production and prevent their being transferred under refrigeration to another freezer adjacent to the consumer, a process which can be carried out with entire safety and the goods preserved in a wholesome condition. Such provisions are absurd and un- necessary, and it is important that a complete study of all the facts in the case be made before such restrictive and destructive conditions be imposed on the industry. There would be no objection to a law providing sanitary and improved methods of thawing, handling, and delivery of frozen goods to consumers, based upon full knowledge of all conditions and factors that enter into the problem, and for the purpose of adequately protecting the public health. The Secretary of Agriculture, in his report for 1911, gives the following informa- tion as to average length of time that goods are carried in cold storage: The fresh beef received into storage during the year beginning with May, 1909, was kept there on the average 2.3 months ; the fresh mutton, an average of 4.4 months ; the fresh pork, an average of .9 of one month; and the butter, an average of 4.4 months. The poultry received during the year beginning with March, 1909, was kept an average of 2.4 months; the eggs, an average of 5.9 months; and the fish were kept an average of 6.7 months. The Secretary of Agriculture sent out blanks to all cold storage warehouse men in the country to arrive at definite information in regard to this matter, and the figures I have quoted are the result of that inquiry. The merchants who store with us finance us and we in turn borrow from the banks. We take the warehouse receipt and the insurance certificate and we endorse it and take it to the bank. That is the customary way of handling that operation. We exact 6 per cent, interest. We have to pay, on an average, from 5 to 6 per cent, ourselves. We guarantee as well and do the work of handling the products and examining them. We really are guarantors of the paper. We endorse the paper and guarantee it to the bank. A very large number of the merchants finance their own transactions. They will take the negotiable receipts and borrow directly from the banks, or they will sell their own paper. There are some merchants whose rating is so high that they can get all that they require on their own paper without collateral. They are, of course, very strong houses that have funds to carry their stock without advances. There are positively no rebates or extras that would make the rate more than 6 per cent. There are certain banks that make a business of loaning on these warehouse re- ceipts, and we have a number of our own banks that take care of our business. They make a specialty of it. Such are the Irving National, the Fidelity Trust Company, the Aetna National, the Citizens' Central, the Market and Fulton, the Commercial Trust Company of New Jersey, the Hudson County National Bank of Jersey City, and others. These loans from the banks are all made on the notes of the shippers or owners, endorsed by them, and are accompanied by warehouse and insurance receipts. 250 I have a statement here showing how much the expense of storage, insurance, and interest adds to the cost of goods, which is an analysis of storage charges on food products at hypothetical cost prices in New York City. In that statement I mention the commodity, the hypothetical cost price and then the storage charge for six months, then the insurance at .416 for six months and then the interest at 6 per cent, for six months, and the total cost with storage charge expenses added, and then the increase in cost due to storage. Total cost with Hypo- Storage Insurance Interest storage Increase thetical charge at .416 at 6% for charge in cost cost for six for six SIX expenses due to Commodity. pnce. months. months. months. added. storage. Butter . .251b. .01 .000725 .0075 .268225 .018 Poultry . .181b. .01 .000522 .0054 .195922 .016 Eggs . .20doz. . .15 1b. . .101b. . .15 1b. .0089 .006 .00333 .0075 .00059 .000435 .00029 .000435 .006 .0045 .003 .0045 .21549 .16095 .106623 .162435 .016 (^!eese .011 Dried fruit .007 Nuts in shell .012 Nuts shelled . .301b. .005 .00087 .009 .31487 .015 Green fruit .. .50bbl. .50 .00725 .075 3.0825 .582 N. N. storage charge on six months basis. New York rates. Insurance charge on six months basis, fireproof warehouse rates, .416. Interest charge on six months basis, 6 per cent. The percentage of increase in cost, covering storage, insurance, and interest on the various products, is as follows: Butter 7.2 percent. Poultry 8.9 " " Eggs 8 Cheese 7.3 Dried fruits 7 Nuts in shell 8 Nuts shelled 5 Green fruit 23.2 The comparatively high charge for storing green fruit is because it occupies so much space. Four or five tubs of butter, that is, $60 or $75 worth of butter, can be stored in the space occupied by a barrel of apples worth, say, $2.50. There is a difference, too, in the cost of carrying different products, due to the necessity of making one room colder than another. Butter and poultry are carried at a very low temperature, zero or below. We call it freezing temperature. The other articles on the list — eggs, cheese, dried fruits, green fruits — take what we call cold storage temperature, that being 20 to 22 degrees above. We get higher rates for freezing service as that is more expensive to maintain. These computations are all based on a six months period, although very few remain in as long as six months. We have no railroad connections in New York, but our Beach Street warehouse and our North Moore Street stores are directly opposite St. John's Park or face the depot. Our warehouses are located in the downtown section because the trade is located there which deals in the articles we handle. We are near the downtown terminals where the goods arrive. We do not find much difficulty in trucking products through the streets because of congestion. We find more delay in outgoing shipments than in incoming. Occa- sionally there is a block due to temporary weather conditions. Our customers bring their own stuff in to us in their own trucks. .251 Some of the goods stored in New York come in carload lots and some in less. Butter usually comes in less than carload lots, because the creameries make up SO and 60-tub lots. Poultry comes in less than carload lots mostly. Eggs, in April and May, come in sometimes in carload lots, but most of the time in less than carload lots. Green fruits come both ways. That is true of New York. In Jersey City we have warehouses that are directly on the tracks. We have very large capacity there. We have three and one-half million cubic feet of capacity there, with direct connections with all roads, and our carload business is stored in Jersey City very largely. We have terminal connection there with all railroads. It works very well indeed. We are directly on the Pennsylvania line and we are right across the way from their freight yard. The goods are delivered from Jersey City in lesser lots as needed. We have our trucks there and make the deliveries ourselves from Jersey City to the trade here in New York. They can truck themselves if they choose to. We do it for the con- venience of the trade and to facilitate business. We thought at first we would make deliveries by the carload to accommodate the trade, but found the trade liked the goods delivered in smaller lots as they sold the goods. Our trucks come across the ferries. We charge the New York rates where we make a charge. Where we make free deliveries, the storage rate in Jersey City includes the free delivery. This de- livery is to any point in the produce district below 14th Street. The rates to Brook- lyn, The Bronx, and Queens are more; we have to charge according to the service. Track connections would be of advantage to our New York stores for the full carloads; for less than carloads it would be difficult to work that. We receive the vast majority of our goods in less than carload lots consigned to different con- signees, except in Jersey City. If we had a proper railroad terminal, so that they could make a continuous passage instead of making a stub end of the tracks, that would be very good. Our warehouses in Jersey City are directly on the Pennsylvania Railroad. The railroad connection is made there by a switching arrangement between the Pennsyl- vania and all the other roads by which they receive foreign cars over their lines and deliver to us at no extra charge. The foreign roads absorb the switching charge. Each road has a point of connection beyond Jersey City or Newark, and there is a road called the Jersey Junction Road that ties them in. They take cars from the other lines, but not packages. Our warehouses in New York all require cartage to effect transportation of goods from the railroad terminals. In New York City our investment is $1,581,547.91 ; in Jersey City it is $979,677.16 ; Jn Newark it is $116,000. Our warehouses are open to the trade generally, no matter what the quantity of goods they desire to -store. We have customers of all kinds in different states. A man may put in S or 5,000 barrels of apples. Anyone who wants to put in any surplus production until the time of scarcity is welcome and we are glad to do business with him. PROPER HANDLING OF FOODSTUFFS FROM FARM TO MARKET DR. MARY E. PENNINGTON, Bacteriological Chemist in the Bureau of Chemistry, United States Department of Agriculture, Located in Philadelphia I have been in this work since 1905. In the course of my work I have been from the Pacific Coast to Budapest; I travel from 30,000 to 40,000 miles a year — between half and three-quarters of the time — and visit the largest cities and the smallest 252 towns. I have occasion to visit the markets of the various cities incidentally in con- nection with the work of the Department of Agriculture and the handling of perish- able products. Visiting the markets is only incidental in the course of our study of marketing. The work of the Department with which I am connected is the study of the handling of perishable products from the source of production all the way to the consumer, which deals first with handling at the source of production and then with transport- ing, and then with warehousing if the marketing is not immediate, or, if it is im- mediate, with the markets of the towns and cities and then with the retail shops and then with the consumers. In the first place, we have the present condition of the population of the country to consider. We have piled our people up in cities twenty stories high in great com- munities such as have never existed before, in this country at least; and those com- munities produce not one thing they eat. By doing this we have thrust the producer farther and farther away from the consuming center. Twenty-five years ago the City of New York could import a considerable portion of the foodstuffs which it used from nearby centers. At the present time, as nearly as it can be estimated, the average haul to the City of New York of the foodstuffs it eats would consume four days by fast freight. The food material which comes here comes from the Pacific Coast — from almost every quarter of the world which produces anything edible. A very large proportion are spoiled foodstuffs coming from 1,000 miles or more away — ^poultry, for instance, and eggs and butter, the major supply of which are produced in the Mississippi and the Missouri Valleys and shipped from there East and West to the Atlantic and to the Pacific Coast. Aside from the distance that we must now transport food products, we have to face also a seasonal production of foodstuffs. By this I mean that in one season we will produce a certain commodity to a greater extent than consumption requires; and in another season we will produce almost none of that commodity. Poultry and eggs again will serve as a good example. We have eggs produced between March or April and July or September; we have broiling chickens produced in July, August, and September; we have roasters in September, October, and November, and perhaps on into December. At those seasons the supplies of those articles are in excess of the demand. During the rest of the year there is practically very little produced. We must then conserve that excess of the season of plenty until the season of scarcity and use it We have done that by canning, where heat has been the preservative; we do it by pickling or smoking, and we do it by cold storage, where cold is the preservative. Now, primarily, the success of the handling of all foodstuffs which are perishable lies in the way the material is produced and the way it is treated all the way from the source of production until it reaches the consumer. The Department of Agri- culture must help the country to save the waste, which is something enormous, and also to keep, so far as possible, the quality at the farm when the produce reaches the consumer. In order to do that we must better the present ways of handling all the way from the producer to the consumer. The handling at the source of pro- duction is, of course, fundamental. It does not, perhaps, enter so prominently into the municipal problem, but that is where the work begins. The handling at the source of transportation is nearer your problem, but is yet somewhat outside of it. Granted for argument that no material is wasted by the producer in his handling, and that no material is wasted by the carrier in its handling, we still find that there is an enormous waste at the market center. I obtained some figures from the New York Board of Health of the amount in pounds of foodstuffs condemned and de- stroyed by them during the year 1911. I find that there are in round figures 6,500,000 pounds of fruit and 2,500,000 pounds of vegetables and 73,000 pounds approximately of 253 eggs and 351,000 pounds of fish and nearly 95,000 pounds of miscellaneous articles. Without exception almost, I think those foodstuffs were destroyed because of decaying. The question which interests the city primarily is, how can that decay be prevented, granting that the goods come here in perfect condition? Of course they do not. But the handling at the source of production is growing better and better and the handling during transportation is growing better and every year sees advances. As we view the matter from the Department of Agriculture, the least advance in the matter of handling is in the large cities. Having got the goods to the city, what are we tq do in order to get the com- modity to the consumer in just as good condition as it reaches the market center? It would seem to us that the two fundamentals are expedition and refrigeration, and they must be seriously considered; and we must have better facilities if the work the Department is doing at the producing centers is to bear its legitimate fruits. We find now all over the country that refrigerator cars loaded with well handled material and brought in on track, stand for varying lengths of time until sidings are available or until truckmen appear. We urge that all producers ship in carload lots because, undoubtedly, there is less waste and better handling obtainable by carload shipments than by less than carload shipments. That doctrine has resulted in the combination of several shippers who have not individually enough for a car but who collectively can fill a car. They ship to different consignees. The car is therefore opened on the track a number of times and its contents are removed by different truckmen. The material is trucked for various distances and the haul may be from fifteen minutes to several hours, and must be made no matter what the atmospheric conditions may be. We know that a refrigerated and perishable product, for its better conservation, must be continued in an even state of refrigeration until the consumer gets it. We know, with the ordinary system of marketing which prevails almost entirely throughout the country, that the refrigerated articles, such as poultry, eggs, butter — all products which are shipped under refrigeration — are subjected to most damaging conditions before they reach another refrigerated environment. It would seem, to save waste, that our refrigerated cars should unload directly into refrigerated spaces and that this trucking system should so far as possible be abolished and that there should be an abundance of refrigerated space for the perishable stuff, for the perishable products that are coming into a community to feed that community. It would seem also that during the season of plenty, when more commodities than the consumption demands reach the market, there should be a reasonable method by which products coming into a city should be conserved. That means a continuous chain of refrigeration. Years before the handling of perishable products had been studied as at present, the arrival of produce at the market center in good condition depended largely on speed, and all the energy of the community was turned in that direction. At the present time, with modern methods of handling stuff, with refrigeration to assist, the methods that are used in caring for foodstuffs is more important and speed is not half so important as proper environment. We find, for instance, that we collect eggs fairly, fresh from the country in July or August, when weather conditions are the worst for the keeping of the eggs, and we chill those eggs immediately where the packer has mechanical refrigeration and we ship those eggs in refrigerated cars, we will say, for a haul of six or seven days. We find those eggs reach the market centers in practically as good condition as they left the producing center. They are then dumped from the car onto the dock or pier somewhere, and stand out in the summer sun for hours, or are unloaded in some railroad shed and stand under cover, which is not so bad, but still not good enough. The eggs sweat. The eggshell be- comes wet. That egg will deteriorate and it will deteriorate rapidly. If, on the other hand, we have an unloading truck which discharges those eggs directly into a re- 254 frigerated space, the eggs are excellent food and a good deal fresher in many in- stances than eggs produced 100 miles from the consuming center and shipped with- out refrigeration. Time in those instances is not half so important a factor as the factor of good handling. We find in poultry that if the poultry is well handled at the producing center, prop- erly dressed, packed, and shipped, and is marketed under refrigeration, it is still an edible bird and in good condition three weeks after cleaning, without being hard- frozen. If it is hard frozen directly after being killed and dressed, it is a good bird for consumption a year after killing. The waste of our present system of marketing is exceedingly difficult to estimate. I can estimate it approximately on the two commodities that I have been using as illustrations, namely, poultry and eggs. The value of the egg crop in the United States is approximately $500,000,000 every year. We have at least $50,000,000 actual waste between the producer and the consumer — eggs which are produced but which are never eaten because of decay or breakage or other results of bad handling. The value of the poultry of the United States is approximately $250,000,000, and it is per- fectly safe to say that 10 per cent, of the poultry produced never reaches a con- sumer because of decay in the various forms of wastage. The Department believes that better handling of perishable goods will save for the people of the United' States a vast amount of foodstuffs which is now wasted. In the teaching of the people who handle the foods to handle them better, there will necessarily be a rise in the quality of those foods, even of those which are now the very best. And the Department also believes that the saving of that waste will not only mean a better and more plentiful food supply for the people, but it will necessarily have some efifect on the price of the food to the people. It will tend to lower the price. The consumer and producer now are undoubtedly carrying between them the loss, which is loss in quality as well as loss in weight. If we can avoid the waste, we will avoid the loss. In our marketing now there is a lack of system generally and absolutely inadequate facilities. We have no proper terminal facilities for unloading the perish- able produce. We have no proper facilities for holding that perishable produce after removing it from the refrigerated cars until it is finally taken to the consumer. Very few of the wholesale men of the markets are properly housed for the best handling of their goods. A great many have equipped themselves with mechanical refrigeration which helps enormously, but our produce sections have not kept pace with the work which the growing cities demand of them. There should be a direct connection between the incoming food supplies and the wholesale dealers, which shall be, so far as possible, continuously refrigerated. There also should be refrigeration abundantly and equably maintained throughout at least the marketing by the wholesaler, and if possible the marketing by the retailer. There are certain progressive retailers who have now installed mechanical refrigera- tion. How we are going to transport the produce from the wholesaler and the wholesale markets, where it must apparently be gathered on its arrival at the market centers, to the retailers, is a question. It has been solved to a certain extent by the refrigerated or insulated trucks that are used in South America and also abroad. They are used in the South American beef trade, and by the receivers in England. It would be perfectly logical to suppose that such a series of insulated covered trucks might be used where the refrigerated produce is transported from one part of the city to another. We feel that the development of railroad terminals is the keynote that applies largely to the situation. The ideal thing is that there shall be a union terminal with refrigerated warehouse facilities. If you can have water transporta- tion as part of your union terminal, so much the better. Such facilities as having cars run directly into a refrig'erating place are in use by private warehouses in a number of places in this country. 255 The difference between the systems of dry and wet packing of poultry for market is this: The old fashion of handling poultry and the way your poultry is handled when killed, almost without exception, is to kill the chicken, bleed it, take the feathers oflf by dry picking, and then remove the natural heat by immersing the bird in cold water first and then in water and ice, and finally packing it down into fine ice and shipping it in either by freight or express. That system is also used by the smaller packers and less progressive packers, even in the far Western districts. If used in the far West, and the produce is subjected to the usual kind of marketing, it means almost three weeks before the produce reaches the consumer. During that time the water from the melting ice is removing from the carcass of the bird the most de- sirable proteids, both as to flavor and nutritive properties. It is not only dissolving out of the bird some of its constituents which we are desirous of keeping, but the water is soaking in as well. Therefore, while the consumer is losing foodstuff, he is also gaining water for which he is paying chicken prices. Ice-packed poultry, taking 20,000 pounds as a uniform carload, means that we would have an actual loss in dollars and cents, estimating the flesh to be worth 20 cents a pound, of about $450, and you would have something like 1,400 pounds of water absorbed. That system of ice packing is in vogue in the cities, and a very large amount of poultry handled with your Eastern and Western cities, too, is ice-packed. It is the method of the smaller dealer who has no adequate facility for handling the product as he should. It does not preserve so well as the dry packing. The dry-packed bird is killed and picked in the same way, and then the carcass is put in a room mechanically chilled to a temperature of from 32 to 38 degrees. At the end of 24 hours the carcass is cooled through to the temperature of the room. It is then packed, ordinarily, in boxes holding twelve birds, rather than large barrels holding 250 pounds or more, and shipped in refrigerated cars and goes through to the markets under refrigerated conditions, so that it finally reaches the market with- out water ever touching it. The keeping is infinitely better and the quality of the bird positively improved. Wherever you have excessive moisture there is bound to be excessive bacterial growth. The ice-packed bird is a most excellent culture medium. The dry-packed bird reduces the chances of the organisms to a minimum. I do not know the amount of money that New York City loses each year in these various causes of loss. I should like to get those figures. I have never found any way to get them where they seemed to be accurate. The nearest thing I have found is the record of condemnation of the New York Board of Health. The amount of eggs condemned in 1911 was about 72,785 pounds. Their value might average 25 cents a pound the year round. There is no process known for producing eggs in . the off season except in very small quantities as compared with the general food supply. Up to the present time such factors have not succeeded in producing much material except for the very healthy, and hardly enough for them. For providing in times of plenty for the storage of products to be used in times of scarcity, the cold storage warehouse is the means by which we are obtaining the best results at the present time. As to whether it should be public or private, I have no opinion. The wholesale terminal markets would be under some sort of municipal provision necessarily. I do not see how you could have the facilities which are apparently necessary for the proper handling of foodstuffs without some provision by the municipality. It might be possible, but it does not seem so. I do not know of any place where municipal retail markets have been a success. That has been tried abroad. My information on the subject is not very extensive. I tried to look up the subject some time ago, but it did not seem very promising. Goods could be brought to market by means of refrigerating cars when the lots are less than carload lots. The railroad takes less than carload lots and so arranges that the various shippers can put their products into the refrigerating car and then 256 the company delivers that at the market center in carload lots. Therefore, the terminal facilities would be of as much advantage to the less than carload shipper as to the carload shipper. I think it would be absolutely necessary for a proper terminal that it should have refrigerating facilities. I do not see how perishable products could possibly be held or handled without refrigeration, and an abundance of it. Fruit, for instance, should continue under proper environment until finally disposed of, and refrigeration is an essential to the environment. When it comes to a question of prices of eggs, for instance, there are so many factors that enter into it it does not seem possible to separate them. The ignorant consumer is the chief cause of excessive prices. I should educate the public It is just this way: The consumer refuses to believe that he cannot get milk this evening that was milked this morning as it was 25 or SO years ago ; and he will not believe that the eggs that come to him were not laid yesterday. When he is told it is almost impossible to get eggs laid inside of a month at the present time he does not believe it. He demands his fresh eggs when they don't exist. It is im- possible for him to get them. The egg supplies coming into the City of New York are practically nothing at all in proportion to your consumption of eggs. Most of the eggs now in New York were started in April. There is 10 per cent, actual loss in the egg trade; the deterioration in quality is in addition to that. The fault lies all the way from the producer to the consumer, straight through. The amount of deterioration due to bad handling at the point of production, in collecting the eggs from the farms, depends entirely on the part of the country. In certain parts they have the peddler system, but in other parts it is entirely railroad delivery, and in other parts entirely farmer delivery. The egg trade varies everywhere. In Tennessee and Kentucky we have the peddler system. In the western country, Kansas and Iowa, it is almost exclusively railroad delivery. Deterioration is first caused by the farmer, because he does not market the eggs promptly; secondly, the dealer is at fault because he holds them too long. When they reach the first concentrator who has a mechanical refrigeration plant and understands the handling of his products, deterioration almost stops when it comes to eggs. To prevent "sweating" when the eggs are removed from the refrigerator cars they should be warmed up gradually, so that, when they finally come into the outer atmosphere, there will not be that abrupt change from a temperature of 50 degrees to a temperature of 80 degrees outside, a difference of 30 degrees. They should be put where there is a good circulation of air and not too great a change in tem- , perature. There are a number of warehouses with graded rooms already in existence. It is a practice among warehouse men who understand their business. If you have no refrigerating space then the best thing you can do is to dry them off as quickly as possible. Fanning is very good. I would educate the public not to ask for fresh eggs when they are not obtainable. The public has an idea that the article that bears the higher price is of a higher quality, which may or may not be so. The work of our department naturally has to do with refrigeration. Our object is to find, if possible, better ways of doing the work which has to be done than at present exists. We make recommendations for the benefit of refrigeration. Information is given out in the form of circulars and bulletins which are published from time to time as the material accumulates. It is entirely optional with the community or industry whether it follows our rec- ommendations or utilizes the information given. In 1911 there was destroyed by the Board of Health 8,435,233 pounds of fruit and 2,567,200 pounds of vegetables. There is no data giveff as to whether the larger percentage of that came in by steamship or by railroad. It does not pretend to give 257 the whole waste of New York; it is only a drop in the bucket. In 1910 the fruit destroyed was over 12,000,000 pounds and the vegetables over 7,000,000. So the condemnation by the Board of Health was cut down greatly in 1911. There seems to have been an improvement in shipping conditions generally from year to year. But the figures as they still stand are entirely too much for a hungry com- munity to waste. Some of the waste is due to the shipping of immature fruit, but the larger part is due to decay. A great deal is due to improper and insufficient terminal facilities here, which often compels railroad companies to hold cars out from three to ten days, so that the product is totally destroyed before it reaches the city at all. A very large proportion of it is due to the railroads, that still have much to learn. But we find that, where the goods are loaded into refrigerating cars under the jurisdiction of the shippers and where the shippers have handled their property properly, unless there is serious delay in transportation, the goods arrive in good order, even such goods as dressed poultry, and that is a difficult commodity to ship. The pre-cooling system for some commodities is a decided success; others are still waiting to be investigated carefully. It has been used for peaches, .cherries, and raspberries. With oranges it does not make so much difference; good handling means more to oranges than refrigeration, that is, not breaking the orange even to a microscopic extent. Most of the pre-cooling is done in the southwest. I do not think we can abolish the middleman, not by any means. In the new system of markets I think he will be part of the wholesale market. He will perform a necessary service and, in so far, he will be retained. There may be some functions that the present middleman performs unnecessarily. With the lack of definite in- formation that we now have concerning markets as they ought to be, I should not like to say wherein his functions are unnecessary. Wherein they are unnecessary, as we work out this problem, we shall eliminate him. I think the establishment of terminal markets would increase the number of men employed and create more business. I think that the additional business would be sufficient to take up the services of all now in business and probably more. It would merely mean a new alignment of the entire industry. There would be no danger of any middleman being thrown out of business by this change. Good products will increase consumption. I was told a few days ago of a guaranteed egg supply obtained by a certain hotel in Toronto where, in one year, the consumption of eggs increased 100 per cent. People ate twice as many eggs in that hotel, and, as a result, there was a very much increased business in that hotel. The eggs were always good there and people went there to get them. That is a rather exaggerated statement of a general principle. I do not mean that every- thing would be so increased. But better handling would result in lower prices and increased supply. Wherever we have lower prices we have an increased con- sumption. We pay an enormous amount now for waste, for something we never get. I would recommend New York City now to gather its incoming facilities into a point as nearly as possible; unload expeditiously into refrigerating quarters; as long as the produce must stay in that environment keep it in the same state of refrigeration and get it out of your refrigerating centers to the consumers as promptly as consistent with good handling. I know of no other way to save waste and lower prices than by establishing terminal markets. 258 MARKET CONDITIONS IN THE BRONX George P. Txbi, Salesman for a Packing Company My work covers the territory from 14th Street in Manhattan to Mt. Vernon. I visit the retail grocers in that territory every day. I have found in the last three years that the trade in fresh vegetables which was formerly in the hands of the grocers is being eliminated from their business, because the grocers will not take the long trip down to the markets in the lower part of Manhattan or to the Harlem Market early in the morning. In the past three years there have been more stands opened outside of meat markets and on public highways than in any other time in the history of The Bronx. The storekeepers let out the privilege of stands in front and have given up the produce business. From Tremont Avenue down the majority of the vegetables in that territory are handled in small stores. They put in a small line of canned goods, but they do not handle the full line and, therefore, cannot be classed as grocerymen. Most of the retailers operating in The Bronx sand Man- hattan and belonging to the Retail Grocers' Association have given up that line of business on account of the difficulty of getting stuff from the markets. Certain commission merchants come down to New York and buy and ship their goods up to Yonkers. From there they resell the goods in The Bronx down as far as Spuyten Duyvil. They also supply Mt. Vernon and New Rochelle. It takes four or five hours to get the goods up to Yonkers, and it is almost impossible for the grocer to get them in time for the market of the day. Consequently the vegetables are held over until the next day for sale. If we had a market in The Bronx where they could buy a full line of goods that would obviate the difficulty. We should have a large terminal market, a market where the railroad cars could be received and the goods distributed to the retailers and the commission merchants and the direct receivers. I am familiar with the trade as far north as Poughkeepsie. That territory gets its supplies from New York mostly. The dealers send their buyers down, who arrive late at night, between 1.00 and 4.00 a. m., and buy their goods and have them shipped up by boat that day. Then they ship east from the river through into Pawling, West Patterson, etc. If a receiving station were established in The Bronx they could get their stuff much more quickly and directly — easier and cheaper. I have heard men in Peekskill and the surrounding country speak of that. To get from that upper territory to High Bridge takej about an hour; from High Bridge to 42d Street takes about 20 minutes; then from 42d Street they must take cars down to the markets where they are going to buy. After they do their buying they return to their places of business in time for the next day's market. They take a chance on getting a few hours' sleep. One man may purchase for two or three, but the great trouble is that they cannot get their goods for sale the same day— tiiey have to lie over for 24 hours. I have known of buyers from Greenwich, Conn., coming in in the evening on the late train and going back on the first one out in the morning. This is most laborious and expensive. There is also great delay in the delivery of the goods, so that the quality suffers and there is great waste. Possibly these things could be eliminated if we had a large terminal market in The Bronx. A man could get into The Bronx in an hour or an hour and ten minutes from almost anywhere within a radius of SO miles, buy his goods' there and have them reshipped by an express freight service and be able to offer them for sale that same day to the general public. It is conceded that where vegetables are held over from day to day there is a loss sometimes running into 20 per cent, and 30 259 per cent. Lettuce, corn, cabbage, and other farm products — the longer they lie in a hot car the more they depreciate in value. I have heard it said that, if there was a general market in The, Bronx, the merchants of Mt. Vernon, New Rochelle. Larchmont and Mamaroneck, Harrison, Rye, Portchester, Greenwich, Sound Beach, Stamford, would only be too glad to come down and patronize it. Some would come as far up as Pleasantville on the Harlem Railroad. I know of one merchant who comes to the Harlem Market and would rather pay the additional charge he has to pay there than to go to the down town terminal. He does not want to lose the time and he would rather pay the little addition that they charge in the Harlem Market. The Gansevoort and West Washington Markets open from one to three a. m. It takes a grocer in Tremont Avenue two and one-half hours to get down there. He has to get there by five o'clock if he wants to do any buying. If he gets there late the choice goods are all sold and he has to take the leftovers. The Bronx to- day is being supplied with citrus fruits and some southern vegetables in this way by small commission men — they will take a load of whatever truck they buy at the terminal here in Manhattan and take that truck up there for general distribution. I have found, through my own experience and through inquiries, that the additional cost runs over 15 per cent, above the selling price down town. If a box of oranges is worth $2.50 on the dock down town, it would cost from $3.25 to $3.35 in The Bronx. I think that extra cost could be eliminated by delivering directly in car-lots to a terminal in The Bronx. The New York Connecting Railway is building a bridge from Long Island to The Bronx. That will give us a direct connection. I have heard that at present Boston is supplied with vegetables 24 hours earlier than the borough of The Bronx. In other words, a train load of produce arriving at Jersey City at noon and destined for Boston is transferred by floats to Mott Haven and one of the fast trains is there made up and the stuff is sent out to Boston that afternoon. During the afternoon the balance of the goods are brought over to Manhattan and offered for sale the next morning. Meanwhile the goods that have gone through to Boston have arrived there. In other words, the Manhattan and Boston markets open at the same time with the same class of goods. Now, be- fore The Bronx can get its goods The Bronx buyers have to go down town and buy in open market and then cart the goods up and they can hardly get there in time for business that same day, as most of the vegetables have to be offered between the hours of 9 a. m. and 2 p. m. for the day's consumption Consequently, The Bronx is usually 24 hours behind Boston in the buying of these goods, which arrive at the same time in Jersey City. If we had proper terminal facilities in The Bronx the New York Central could deliver goods within two hours after the train arrives at Spuyten Duyvil. Market facilities up there will assist the people very much. The Bronx is growing very fast: three years ago I had a little over 900 grocery stores to serve and now I have over 1,700. The sort of market we should have would be a large place _ where the Railroads could bring in their cars and unload in such a manner that trucks could drive in and load up for general distribution without delay. It should be a general railroad terminal for all railroads — a union terminal. It is impossible to overestimate the inconvenience it is to a groceryman to buy down town when he lives in The Bronx. I have heard grocerymen say that they would not handle any vegetables because they would not get up at four o'clock in the morning and go down town to the market for anybody, and it does not pay them to handle them otherwise, because the overhead charge is too much. The sooner we get these railroad terminals and distributing points the better for all concerned. I certainly think that, if the grocers throughout The Bronx had opportunities to get their vegetables directly from a market in The Bronx that would supply a general line of goods, they would 260 begin to handle vegetables again. I think that trade in vegetables has decreased somewhat in The Bronx in comparison with the normal increase that it should show in the growth of The Bronx. The groceryman who does not handle fresh vege- tables naturally will talk canned goods, and, if he cannot sell a customer fresh vegetables, will try to sell canned goods. That has a tendency to reduce the quantity of fresh vegetables sold. Since proper facilities have been provided in The Bronx for the receiving of potatoes we can buy potatoes as cheap as anybody in New York City, and that is about the only thing we can buy as cheap or cheaper. Those are Maine potatoes coming down on the New Haven road. I think, if the same facilities were furnished for other vegetables, the price would diminish in the same way. MARKET CONDITIONS IN STATEN ISLAND Sidney A. Reeve, of Staten Island I am a consulting engineer, resident in Staten Island for the past three years. The markets of Staten Island are, so far as my knowledge goes, all retail markets scattered throughout the several villages of the island. There are no public markets. To my knowledge there is one commission dealer who deals in wholesale produce. The farm produce used there comes from the New York markets — although Staten Island grows large quantities of farm produce, it is all brought to New York and then brought back and sold at retail. Garden vegetables are grown on the island and some eggs and poultry. Staten Island comprises about 46 square miles. The population is much dif- fused in villages more or less separated from each other. I should say that less than half of the island is devoted to farming. The produce is taken to New York in large two and four-horse trucks during the night. It reaches the ferry from eight to ten in the evening and goes mostly to Gansevoort Market; some of it goes as far as Harlem. The trucks stay in the markets all night and leave in the early morning on the return trip. All the larger producers sell at wholesale. The garden produce used in Staten Island is brought from the New York markets in the wagons of our retail dealers. There must be over a score of them at least, each one having his own horse and wagon. We do not consider that the market facilities of Staten Island are at all adequate for our needs. There are no facilities except these small retail stores, all drawing supplies from New York, with the exception of the small percentage which comes through the local commission mer- chants. None of the produce comes directly by boat. The Baltimore & Ohio is the only railroad that has its own terminal in Staten Island. The officials of that road have been desirous of developing the car-lot business in bringing in produce to Staten Island, but there are not proper terminal facilities. The road traverses the area all the way from Chicago and Louisville east, and has transfer facilities with all the trunk lines, so that any gatden produce coming in carload lots from the south and west could be transferred at convenient points of the Baltimore & Ohio for delivery at Staten Island. This road traverses one of the most fertile districts in the United States, where large quantities of fruits and vegetables are produced. We get, also, car floats from the New Haven railroad in the Harlem River section. We have no carload shipments of garden produce going from Staten Island to my knowledge. I think there should be established a wholesale cold storage and general storage terminal at St. George, with retail distributing centers at various points in the island. I name St. George because that is the railroad terminal and the ferry 261 terminal, and, therefore, is the point to or through which all the wholesale produce produced in or passing through the island must pass. ' The farm wagons all go through to lake the ferry and the railroad cars which unload or load come within 100 yards of the same point. Whatever Staten Island needs should stop there. It is perfectly absurd to cart it all the way over to Gansevoort Market and then require our retail dealers to go there and bring it back again. That necessarily and obviously adds to the cost. I think we raise considerably more than we need. I think a good deal of distribution to the ultimate consumer could take place there, through counter sales or wagon delivery on telephone orders. The bulk of the native population of the island comes to St. George twice each day, going to New York City and returning and could stop for purchases without loss of time or money. Since the Baltimore & Ohio terminal was built in St. George that place has naturally grown into the center of transportation for the island, and one facility after another has been brought to that point. The ferry and trolley terminals are not yet completed there, so that the opportunity for the actual construction of a market terminal has never presented itself, but definite plans will be presented within a few weeks or months. There is a large yard there with a wide space under the new trolley platform which has as yet been designed for no use whatever and is entirely open to development. It is about 400 by 250 feet and ranges from IS feet in height at one end to 26 feet at the other. The property is owned by the city and is under the control of the Department of Docks and Ferries. It abuts directly on the freight yards of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad and the Staten Island Rapid Transit Road, so that nothing but the building of platforms and similar facilities will be necessary. I think the population of the island, which is about 80,000, warrants a wholesale market and cold storage facilities. The location at St. George is ideal. The space there beneath the trolley platform could not be improved upon for receiving important foods by carload or boat load, and Staten Island produce by wagon load. Local farmers cannot afford to sell in less than wagon load lots, and existing small retailers cannot buy so much at once. Consequently, each night the ferryboats are loaded with Staten Island farm wagons hauling produce to Manhattan markets, and each morning with the wagons of Staten Islanders going to haul back fractions of these same wagon loads. The farmer could get a higher, and the retailers a lower, price if the stuff never left the island. A trolley freight service to bring up the products of the island might be of value, but at present most of the trolley lines do not traverse the agricultural districts of the island, but reach more the residential districts. A popular movement arose about a year ago which resulted in the formulation of a plan for a cooperative organization to operate a wholesale and retail market at St. George. The plan included provision for cold and general storage. To organize the method of food supply into an efficient system was the object, cutting out middlemen, unnecessary handling, duplication of profits, etc. The island is capable of producing all the garden stuff, poultry and eggs, and much of the butter and fruit consumed by its inhabitants. There are now too many dealers between the farmer and the retailer. Cold storage is also an essential of everyday food supply. Most people think of cold storage as used only to keep meat from January to July, or butter from June to March. They do not realize that nearly all the stuff they eat has been in cold storage for a few days at least. Food cannot be shipped into a big city by steamer- load, carload, or even farm wagon load without it being necessary for the receiver to put part of it immediately into cold storage, selling fresh only what he can dispose of immediately. Much of our food is bought and sold speculatively several times while in cold storage, or is shipped from warehouse to warehouse repeatedly 262 as it changes owners. Each sale increases its price; each handling reduces its quality. The old-fashioned open market, where the producer sells to the retailer, is gone, never to return. It is our wish and determination to have a terminal market. If the people are not ready to accept a cooperative organization, we are going to have a commercial organization take charge. Representatives of big commercial organizations have been there and gone over the grounds. I am, however, going to push this thing as far toward a cooperative plan 'as I can. MARKETS IN GERMANY Mr. Franz Marquard I had occasion last summer to examine the market conditions in Europe during July and August. I spent over two months there. I found market halls in Cologne, Frankfort-on-the-Main, Breslau, and Berlin. The latest market halls in Germany are in Munich. They were finished last March. The Hamburg market was not yet finished, but was already being used. Cologne I visited first, but it was hardly worth visiting. The complaints about the market hall were very great, the main one being that it wasn't near enough to the railroad. It was about 300 feet away and produce had to be carted over by small hand trucks. The market takes in about a city block. It is wholesale and retail, with auction sales. It is under the control of the city. They have one market building — a large hall with peak roof — and several open market squares for wagons. Most of the produce handled comes by railroad. They open at two or three o'clock in the morning and auction sales are held early — at four o'clock — by the city auctioneer, at which the retailers buy. The stuff is directly consigned by the city to the auctioneer. The auction method is the quickest way of disposing of the goods. In half an hour or an hour everything is disposed of. After that, during the day, there were private sales. The dealers have stalls in the market — separate places allotted to them where they exhibit their goods and conduct sales. They have cold storage in the casemates where space is rented to the stand holders by the square meter. The condition of the vegetables in the market was good. They were fresh. One difficulty about the market was that the surrounding streets were not wide enough. Although there was a pretty large space where they could stand, the wagons of the farmers and dealers had difficulty in coming and going in the morning. The Cologne market is an antiquated market — ^the modern ones are better. In Munich I found a new market hall in connection with a bonded warehouse. The market itself is about a block and a half each way. The bonded warehouse is about 40 by 300 feet. It is the central point for the distribution of oranges from Italy and cheese from Holland, which come to this warehouse directly by carloads and are sold there in smaller quantities to wholesalers. The method is by private sale. The wholesalers pay $1.10 a square foot for the sales stands and 14 cents a square foot for cellar space. They miscalculated the size of the market needed; they had estimated how much the city was using up to that time, but, since the market was opened, they have found that the farmers knew they would get a good market and a certain market for their produce, and they have been sending so much stuff to the market that they have not room enough to handle it all, and, as they have no more space, they will have to build another market hall. I think this one was working with a deficit the first year, and the manager told me the one big complaint he had to make was that the hall was not built right. The ventilation was not good and the draughts in winter 263 very strong. Consequently many farmers prefer to send in their goods to the auctioneer rather than come themselves. The market is under city control. They have the usual rules — just as in Cologne — very strong rules about the visiting of the market and about the selling. For in- stance, the farmers and gardeners coming there were allowed to sell any quantity, while the dealers were not; they were restricted to certain limits. For instance, they have to sell not less than a barrel or a bag of potatoes, while the farmers themselves can sell in any quantity. This market is on the railroad and it was built on the outskirts of the city because there wasn't room enough within the city itself. It is about a S5-minute car ride from the center of the city, and housewives go there and buy. There is only one railroad going into it, but there is a city railroad that connects. Munich is a very cheap market, as it is in an agricultural district. There is about as much stuff brought in by wagon as by train, except for the imported stuff. They have very good cold storage facilities at the market. There is one street running all around the casemates down below, and the upper story that is even with the other streets is connected by little bridges, where they cross over a lower street, and so the trucks, can drive directly into the casemates and deliver their goods there, and inside they have lifts to get the stuff to the selling floor. Each stall is provided with one. The main point about the market that would be useful to us is the close railroad connection; and the trolley connection so that the people can go there and buy. They do not have a retail section but the wholesale stores sell retail in the corners and the lesser places are taken up by the farmers and retailers. The best market was in Hamburg, the latest. They have water connection and railroad connection. The market hall itself is very small. When it is finished there will be only two small halls about 80 by 100 feet each, but they have an open place, an open square with casemates below. It is about four city blocks in size and has already proved too small. They made the same mistake as in Munich: they built too small; and in Hamburg they built in the center of the city.' The people along the Elba are not only farmers but shippers themselves; they take little sailboats and put their stuff in and so they come by boat to market. The market is under the control of the city. They rent out space to the stand- holders. They do not know yet how well it is going to pay because the market is hardly opened yet. They will have auction sales as soon as the railroad cars come in. The railroad comes over a bridge and runs along an embankment 20 to 25 feet high, and under that embankment are casemates. They have built 14 large halls, each one of them about 5S feet wide. In the middle of these halls, going across, is a driveway where the elevators from the railroad cars come down. Each of the casemates has an elevator large enough to hold one-sixth of a railroad car, so they have only to go up and down six times to get the stuff from a whole railroad car into the basement. They have no delivery system because the market is in the center of the city, right where the old town is. The market is mostly retail; the wholesalers will be in the halls. They will be able to unload about ISO cars a day into the casemates, and one of the casemates is for auctions only. For the general system of retail distribution throughout the city they have stores, just as we have here — retail stores, small stores, and, as everywhere where there are large cities, these stores were on the increase. Instead of becoming less they were becoming more, and that is the reason why the people in Frankfort-on-the-Main are going to build their new market, for which they have already appropriated the money, not in the center of the city, but on the outskirts, and they intend to have it so that only the retailers come there from the city to get the stuff at wholesale and 264 bring it back to the stores and then sell it to the neighborhood. They claim that they can make good on that because they will be able to deliver so much cheaper than at the present time; the retailers will be able to buy so much cheaper that they can sell also much cheaper. In Hamburg the question was put to the farmers whether they wanted a covered market or an open market and the farmers voted nearly unanimously against the former for several reasons, chiefly because it would make the stands a little dearer, and they were afraid the stuff would spoil more easily. The wholesalers wanted a hall. In Hamburg they hold markets twice a day — once early in the morning and once in the afternoon. The afternoon market is more for the housewives. It does not seem to be growing more difficult for them to bring in goods by truck on the market wagons to these little towns like Hamburg or Munich, but in Berlin it is certainly difficult. Stuff comes to Hamburg by boat down the Elba, which flows past great producing districts, the most fertile districts in Germany. They receive by wagon and boat 1,300 wagon loads a day. They have no other smaller markets in the outskirts of the city. The storekeepers drive up to the central market with their wagons early in the morning. All the functions pertaining to the sale of food are under one bureau of the city management I think it is the market police that take care of the food inspec- tion and clean the markets. They issue licenses and collect rents. I think they will open up a very large district in Germany by having this auction selling. Then the farmers can ship by rail directly to the city of Hamburg to the auctioneer, and he will take care of the goods. They tell me the main thing is for them to get as much stuff into the market from the farmers as possible, so as to prohibit the wholesalers from fixing their own prices. They tell me in Frankfort, for instance, wholesalers always try to corner the market in some way, as, for in- stance, by telling the farmers there wasn't any market for potatoes when potatoes were very high. The auction system brings in more produce. The farmers know they will get their checks in a few days. They receive them in five days. They charge a commission of S per cent, for selling. The city takes that. The auction sales are conducted by city employees who are paid by the year. XV. BIBLIOGRAPHY Compiled by Charles C. Williamson, Ph. D., Chief of the Division of Economics and Sociology, New York Public Library I. Markets and marketing. II. Cost of living and food prices. III. Municipal slaughter houses and the meat supply. IV. Cold storage of food products. V. Transportation of food products. VI. The Distribution of Foodstuffs. VII. Cooperation, with special reference to the production and distribution of food products. I. MARKETS AND MARKETING Alvokd, Henry E. Cattle markets and abattoirs in Europe. 9 pi., 1 plan. (In : United States. Animal Industry Bureau. Annual report, [no.] 18. Washington, 1902. 8vo. p. 279-305.) Andrews, Frank. Marketing grain and live stock in the Pacific coast region. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1911. 94 p. 8vo. (U. S. Statistics Bureau, Agriculture Dept. Bulle- tin 89.) Andrews, Frank. Methods and cost of marketing. (In: United States. Agriculture Department. Yearbook. 1909. Washington, 1910. p. 161-172.) Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, July and November, 1913 (Philadelphia). Architectural Handbook, Vol. Ill, Part 4, 2d ed. Darmstadt, 1891. Bawden, J. Distribution and sale of perishable crop products. (In: Bailey, L. H., Cyclo- pedia of American Agriculture. New York, 1909. v. 4. u. 245-247.) Bell. Sir James, and James Paton. Municipal Markets. (In their: Glasgow; its municipal organization and ad- ministration. Glasgow, 1896. 4to. p. 276-291.) Bloch, Richard. Le marche europeen des denrees perissables. (Revue politique et parlementaire. Paris, 1910. tome 63. p. 101-127.) Boston. Market Department. Annual report of superintendent. (In: Boston city council. City Documents for the year, 1890— Boston, 1891— 8vo.) 266 Bradford's Municipal Markets. A new scheme of extensions. Picturesque group of buildings, to cost twenty thousand pounds. (Municipal Journal and London. London, 1899. folio, p. 853.) Brown, Edward. The marketing of poultry. (Royal Agricultural Society of England. Journal. London, 1898. 8vo. series 3. v. 9. p. 270-286.) Card, Fred W. Farm management, including business accounts, suggestions for watching markets, ... etc. N. Y. : Doubleday, Page & Co., 1907. xiii, 270 p., 63 pi. 8vo. (The Farm Library.) Carter, J. F. Public Markets in American Cities. (American City Magazine, February, 1913. New York.) Crissey, Forrest. Robbing the hand that feeds. (Everybody's Magazine. New York, 1909. v. 20. p. 761-771.) De Voe, Thomas F. The Market Book. New York, 1862. Fetter, Frank A. The theory of the middleman. (In: Bailey, L. H., Cyclopedia of American Agriculture. New York, 1909. v. 4. p. 238-241.) Gerhard, William Paul. Sanitary features of markets and abattoirs. (Amer. Architect, v. 90, p. 187-188, 203-204; v. 91, p. 59-61, 85-87. New York, 1906-07.) GossNER, Erich. Uber die Entwicklung und heutige Organisation des Berliner Fischmarktes. 6 [2] 93 p. Staats-u. socialwiss. Forsch. v. 19, no. 5. Leipzig, 1901. Gravesend's ancient market . . . Description of the new market. Municipal Journal and London. London, 1899. folio, v. 8. p. 38.) Great Britain. Market rights and tolls. Royal commission on. Reports as to foreign markets. London, 1891. 71 p. folio. In: Great Britain. Parliament. Sessional papers. 1890-91. v. 41. Great Britain. Market rights and tolls, Royal commission on. Reports. London, 1889-91. 14 v. in 9. folio. In: Great Britain. Parliament. Sessional papers. 1881-91. v. 37-41, 53-55. V. 1. First report . . . with the report . . . relating to the history of fairs and markets in the United Kingdom. V. 2-4. Minutes of evidence. England. V. 5-6. Minutes of evidence. Ulster, Leinster and Connaught. V. 7-10. Minutes of evidence. England, Scotland and Ireland. V. 11. Final report of the commissioners. V. 12. Precis of minutes of evidence taken before the commissioners . . . V. 13. Pt 1. Statistics relating to markets in London, and also to markets owned by local authorities in England and Wales. . . . V. 13. Pt. 2. Statistics relating to markets in England and Wales owned by persons other than local authorities. V. 13. Pt. 3. Statistics relating to markets in Scotland and Ireland. V. 14. Reports as to foreign markets. 267 Halle, Levy von. Die Organisation des Berliner Vieh — und Fleischmarktes. (Jahrbuch fur Gesetz- gebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich. Leipzig, 1892. Jahrgang 16. Heft 2. p. 49-116.) Hartmann, Julius. Die Tatigkeit der Gemeinde Wien auf dem Gebiete der Approvisionierung. (Ztschr. fiir Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung. Wien, 1909. 8vo. Bd. 18, p. 616-6SS.) Hennicke, Reports on Public Markets in Germany, England, France and Italy. Berlin, 1881. Hill, George G. Marketing farm produce. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1897. 27 p. illus. 8vo. (U. S. Agriculture Dept. Farmers' Bull. no. 62.) HiLSON,' J. Lindsay. Scottish market customs. (Notes and Queries. London, 1909. 8vo. ser. 10, V. 12, p. 121-123.) Holmes, George K[irby]. Consumers' fancies. Washington, 1904. p. ii, 417-434. 8vo. Repr. : U. S. Agri- culture Department. Yearbook. 1904. HUTT, W. N. Marketing fruit and truck crops. College Park, Md. : Agricultural Experiment Station, 1907. p. 211-257. illus. 8vo. (Maryland Agricultural Experiment Sta- tion. Bulletin No. 116.) KlELY, P. M. The middleman in practice. (In Bailey, L. H., Cyclopedia of American Agri- culture. New York, 1909. v. 4. p. 241-243.) Knowledge of Building for Architects, Vol. II, Part 1, Market-hallen. Berlin, 1897. Kuster. Die hygienische Bedeutung stadtischer Markthallen, ihre Einrichtung und ihr Betrieb. [With discussion.] (Deut. Vierteljahrsschr. f. offentl. Gesundheits- pflege. Braunschweig, 1909. 8vo. v. 41, p. 122-lSO.) Kuester, Heineich. Markthallen. (In: Prausnitz, W. Atlas und Lehrbuch der Hygiene mit be- sonderer Beriicksichtigung der Stadte-Hygiene. Miinchen, 1909. 4to. p. 664- 683.) Lambert, D. J. Preparing and marketing poultry products, and the care of eggs. (In: Bailey, L. H. Cyclopedia of American Agriculture. New York, 1908. v. 3. p. 544-S47.) Lange, Edgar. Die Versorgung der grosstadtischen Bevolkerung mit frischen Nahrungsmitteln unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung des Marktwesens der /Stadt Berlin. Eine wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Studie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1911. viii,. 83 p. 8vo. (Staats-und sozialwissenschaftliche Forschungen. Heft 1S7.) Bib- liography, p. 83. Larkin, M. Lippitt. The butter market. (Jour, of political economy. Chicago, 1912. 8vo. v. 20. p. 267-275.) 268 Leicester's municipal markets. Wholesale market to be erected. ... A profitable municipal asset. (Municipal Journal and London. London, 1899. folio, v. 8. p. 587.) Lessons from Paris. — II. The municipal council of the French capital owns and man- ages nearly all the city's markets and slaughter houses. . . . (Municipal Journal. London, 1906. v. 15. no. 682. p. 199-200.) LiNDEMANN, A. Die Markthallen Berlins : Ihre baulichen Anlagen und Betriebseinrichtungen. Im auftrage des Magistrats dargestellt. Berlin: J. Springer, 1899. 2 p. 1., 90 p., 1 1., 25 plans, 7 plates, folio. (Berlin, Magistrat.) LiNDEMANN, H[UG0]. Markte und Markthallen. (In his : Die deutsche Stadteverwaltung. . . . Stuttgart, 1906. 8vo. p. 133-149.) LUECKER, HeINRICH. Die Gemeindebetriebe in den Stadten, Kreisen und Landgemeinden des Ober- schlesischen Industriebezirks. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1910. vi p., 1 1., 82 p., 1 map. 8vo. (Verein fur Socialpolitik. Schriften. Bd. 129. Teil 10.) p. 31-36 Markte, Markthallen. LuEGER, Encyclopedic of Technic, Vol. IV, 2d ed., 1908. Madison's municipal market. Enclosed market room, market master's room, waiting rooms. . . . (Municipal Journal, New York, 1911. v. 31, no. 7, p. 197-199.) Maltbie, Milo Roy. Municipal functions : a study of the development, scope and tendency of munici- pal socialism. (Municipal Affairs. New York, 1898. v. 2. no. 4. p. S77-814. 8vo.) Markets and abattoirs, p. 716-722. Markets, slaughter houses, and foreign animals, wharves belonging to the Corporation of Glasgow. (In Glasgow [city], Scotland. Handbook on the municipal enter- prises. Glasgow, 1904. p. 130-135.) Markets procedure. A valuable inquiry into market methods and practice of some of the largest English cities and towns. . . . (Municipal Journal. London, 1905. V. 14. no. 639. p. 425. no. 641. p. 491-492.) DE Massy, R. Public Markets and Commerce. London and Paris. Miller, Cyrus C. Municipal Market Policy, Published by the City Club of New York. 1912. What the City Can Do to Reduce the Cost of Living. Address delivered at Con- ference of Mayors of the State of New York at Binghamton, N. Y. June 6, 1913. Wholesale Terminal Markets. (American City Magazine, April, 1913. New York.) MowRY, Don E. Municipal markets: Boston, Baltimore, Chicago and New Orleans market build- ings. . . . (Municipal Jour, and Engineer, v. 23, 462-464. New York, 1907.) MowRY, Don E. Municipal markets : an economic necessity. 1 port. (Government, v. 2, p. 177- 182. Boston, 1907.) 269 Municipal markets of St. Louis, illus. (Municipal Jour, and Engineer. New York, 1910. 4to. V. 28, p. 611-616.) Municipalisation of Spitalfields Market. Should it be acquired by the London County Council? How a profitable bargain may be secured for the ratepayers. (Munici- pal Journal and London. London, 1899. folio, v. 8. p. 4S7.) Neue, Die, Grossmarkthalle in Miinchen. Miinchen, 1912. 6 1. 4vo. (Miinchener Gemeinde-Zeitung. Amtliche Beilage zu Nr. 13.) New York Public Library. Check list of works relating to the streets, markets, real estate, public buildings, etc., of the City of New York in the New York Public Library. (New York Public Library. Astor, Lenox, and Tilden foundations. Bull. New York, 1900. 4vo. V. 5. p. 1S1-1S9.) NORMAND, J. Les halles centrales de Paris. (L'Economiste frangais. Paris, 1912. 4vo. Annee 40 (1912, V. 1). p. 798-800.) Oldys, Henry. The game market of to-day. (In: United States. Agriculture Department. Yearbook. 1910. Washington, 1911. p. 243-2S4.) OSTHOFF, GeORG. Anlagen fiir die Versorgung der Stadte mit Lebensmitteln. Markthallen, Schlach- thofe und Viehmarkte. Jena: G. Fischer, 1894. (In: Handbuch der Hygiene, hrsg. von T. Weyl. Jena, 1893. 8vo. Bd. 6, p. vi, 1-79.) Papers relating to the Washington Market Company. [Presented by Mr. Dick and ordered to be printed. May 19, 1908.] (U. S. 60th Cong., 1st sess. Senate doc. no. 495.) Pennington, M. E. Studies of poultry from the farm to the consumer. Washington: Govt. Prtg. Off., 1911. 42 p. Illus. 8vo. (U. S. Chemistry Bureau. Circular. No. 64.) Philips, A[llen] G. The marketing of eggs. Manhattan, Kan.: the station, 1909. 1 1. p. 243-258, 1 1. 8vo. (Kansas. Experiment station. Bulletin 162.) Plumb, Charles S. Marketing live stock. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1903. 40 p. 8vo. (U. S. Agriculture Dept. Farmers' Bull. No. 184.) Quasi-Public Markets in New Orleans. (Municipal Journal and Engineer. New York, 1909. v. 26. no. 12. p. 490.) Rapport addresse au President de la Republique par la commission superieure des Halles Centrales de Paris sur la situation des halles pendant I'annee 1901. Min- istere de I'agric. Annales, Annee, 21, p. 73-81. Paris, 1902. RiETSCHEL, Siegfried. Markt und Stadt in ihrem rechtlichen Verhaltnis. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der deutschen Stadtverf assung. Leipzig : Veit & Co., 1897. viii, 233 p. 8vo. Rochester's public market. (Municipal Journal and Engineer. New York, 1908. v. 24. no. 14. p. 385-389.) 270 RossiE, C. Smith. Cheap meat: the German "Freibank." (Contemporary Review. London, 1910. V. 98. p. 661-669.) Sanitary, The, features of markets and abattoirs. (American Architect. New York, 1907. V. 91. no. 1623. p. 59-61. no. 1626. p. 85-87.) Scandal, The, of London's markets. London: The Fabian Society [189-?]. 3 p. 8vo. (Fabian tracts, no. 6.) Shaw, S. B. The preparation of fruit and vegetables for market. Raleigh, 1909. 38 p. illus. 8vo. (North Carolina. Agriculture Department, v. 30. no. 5.) SCHILUNG, B. Die neue Hauptmarkthalle in Koln. (Germany. Ministerium der offentlichen Arbeiten. Zeitschrift fiir Bauwesen. Berlin, 1906. folio. Jahrgang 56. col. 209-252. [22 p.] ScHWARZ, Karl. Der Wiener Zentralviehmarkt St. Marx, seine Bedeutung fiir den Viehhandel und seine volkswirtschaftliche Funktion. (In: Verein fiir Socialpolitik. Schriften. Bd. 130. Teil 1. p. 23-93.) Slocum, Rob R. Marketing eggs through the creamery. Washington: Govt. Prtg. Off., 1911. 12 p. 8vo. (U. S. Agriculture Dept. Farmers' Bull, [no.] 445.) Smith, Hugh M. A North Holland cheese market. (National Geographic Magazine. Washington, 1910. V. 21. p. 1051-1066.) Sperk, Bern HARD. Die Approvisionierung Wiens mit Fleisch. (Zeitschrift fiir Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung. Wien, 1904. 4vo. Bd. 13. p. 65-97.) Stoneburn, F. H. The marketing of poultry products. Storrs, 1906. 28 p. illus. 8vo. (Con- necticut. Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. Bull. 38.) Strach, Georg. Zum Markthallenbau in Posen. (Staedtebau. Berlin, 1909. folio. Jahrgang 6. p. 116-118.) Sullivan, J. W. "Markets for the People." New York. Macmillan Co. 1913. Symposium, A. — ^The markets of some great cities. [Boston, Baltimore, Chicago, San Francisco.] (Chautauquan. Meadville, 1897. v. 24. p. 332-335.) United States. Industrial Commission. Distribution of farm products in city markets. (In: Report of the Industrial Commission. 1901. v. 6. p. 337-379.) United States. Industrial Commission. Report ... on the distribution of farm products. Washington: Gov. Prtg. OfiE., 1901. 508 p., 2 diagr., 5 maps. 8vo. (56th Cong., 2nd sess. H. doc. 494.) V. 6 of Commission's reports. 271 United States. Industrial Commission. Testimony as to middle-men. (In: Report of the Industrial Commission . . . 1901. V. 10. p. 132-138; 152-163; 170-193; 220-227; 243-255; 255-273; 480-485; 591-604. Digest of testimony, p. ccxcii-ccxciii.) United States. Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee (House). Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce of the House of Representatives. H. R. 19,069 and H. R. 19,132, to establish in the Department of Commerce and Labor a bureau of markets. Feb. 6, 1912. Wash- ington: Govt. Prtg. Off., 1912. 20 p. 8vo. United States. Manufactures Bureau. Municipal markets and slaughterhouses in Europe. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910. 117 p. pap. 8vo. (Special consular reports, v. 42, part 3.) Vallin, E. Hygiene comparative des marches converts et des marches volants. (Rev. d'hygiene et de police sanitaire. v. 22. p. 482-492. Paris, 1900.) Van Vorst, Mrs. John. The markets of Paris. (Lippincott's Monthly Magazine. Philadelphia, 1910. V. 86. no. 511. p. 90-95.) Washington market, Newark, N. J. illus. (Municipal Jour. & Engineer. New York, 1910. 4vo. v. 28. p. 759-761.) Washington's municipal markets. (Municipal Journal and Engineer. New York, 1910. V. 29. no. 3. p. 81-83.) White, Charles Henry. The Fulton Street Market. (Harper's Magazine. New York, 1905. v. 111. p. 616-623.) Wisconsin State Board of Public Affairs. Report upon Cooperation and Marketing. Madison, Wis., 1912. II. COST OF LIVING AND FOOD PRICES Bibliography List (A) of works in the New York Public Library relating to prices. Bull. N. Y. Pub. Lib. V. 6. p. 115-159. Meyer, Hermann Henry Bernard. Select list of references on the cost of living and prices. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910. V. 107 p. 4vo. (United States. Library of Congress.) Royal Statistical Society. Bibliography of the prices of cereals. Presented by the R. S. S. to the Inter- national Statistical Institute at the Copenhagen Congress, August, 1907. (Royal Statistical Society. Journal. London, 1908. 8vo. v. 71. p. 178-206.) General Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. "The Cost of Living." July, 1913. Philadelphia. 212 Bbuneau, L. La cherte de la viande et ses causes. (Grande rev. Paris, 1911. 8vo. annee IS. V. 69. p. 598-608, 801-813.) Chapin, Robert Coit. The influence of income on standards of life. (Amer. Econ. Assoc. Quar. Papers and Discussions of the 21st annual meeting. Princeton, N. J., 1909. 8vo. ser. 3. V. 10. no. 1. p. 180-192.) Chapin, Robert Coit. The standard of living among workingmen's families in New York City. New York: Charities Publication Committee, 1909. xv. 372 p. 8vo. (Russell Sage Foundation.) Ckowell, John Franklin. Speculation and farm prices. (In: Bailey, L. H. Cyclopedia of American Agri- culture. New York, 1909. v. 4. p. 243-245.) DuLAc, Albert. La formation des prix des denrees alimentaires de premiere necessite. Paris: M. Riviere et Cie., 1911. 2. p. 1. 158 p. 12vo. (Bibliotheque des sciences economiques & sociales.) FOLDES, Bela. Die Getreidepreise im 19. Jahrhundert. (Jahrb. f. Nationalokonomie u. Sta- tistik. ser. 3. v. 29. p. 467-518. Jena, 1905.) Jones, Edward D. The causes of the increased cost of agricultural staples and the influence of this upon the recent evolution of other objects of expenditure. (Michigan Academy of Science. Report. Lansing, Mich., 1910. 8vo. Report no. 12, 1910. p. 137-142.) Layton, W. T. Wheat prices and the world's production. (Royal Agricultural Society of Eng- land. Journal. London, 1909. 8vo. v. 70. p. 99-110.) Levasseur, Emile. Enquete sur le prix des denrees alimentaires depuis un quart de siecle dans soixante-dix lycees. illus. (Soc. de statist, de Paris. Jour. v. SO. p. 314-349. Paris, 1909.) Levasseur, Emile. Le prix du ble dans divers pays au xix siecle. Institut internat. de statist. Bull, v. 18. no. 2. p. 111-118. LeHaye, 1910. Magee, J. D. Food prices and the cost of living. (Jour, of Polit Econ. Chicago, 1910. 8vo. v. 18. p. 294-308.) S, A. P. Enquete sur la cherte de la vie. Les prix des denrees alimentaires depuis 25 ans. (Grande rev. Paris, 1909. 8vo. v. 58. p. 363-368.) Sauerbeck, Augustus. Prices of commodities, 1867 to date. (Roy. Statist. Soc. Jour. London, 1886 to date. 8vo. v. 49. p. 581-648.) (Continued yearly to date.) 273 Streightoff, Frank Hatch. The standard of living among the industrial people of America. Boston : Hough- ton MiflSin Company, 1911. xix. 196 p. 1 1. 8vo. (Hart, Schaffner & Marx prize essays, [v.] 8.) UnderhilLj Frank P. The cost of adequate nutrition. (Yale Rev. New Haven, 1911. 8vo. v. 1. p. 261-273.) ZOLLA, D. La hausse des prix et le developpement de la production agHcole. (Rev. polit et parlementaire. Paris, 1912. 8vo. tome 71. p. 77-99.) Unimid States Halstead, Marshal. Wages and cost of living in Great Britain and the United States. (Monthly Consular Repts. no. 290. Nov., 1904. p. 44-49) Hanger, G. W. W. Cost of living and retail prices in the United States. 14 pi. (Ball, of the Bureau of Labor, v. 9. p. 1129-1164. Washington, 1904.) McCuMBER, Porter J. Prices of farm products. (United States. Congressional Record. Washington, 1910. 4vo. V. 45. p. 1479-1483.) Massachusetts. Cost of Living Commission. Report of the commission . . . May, 1910. Boston: Wright & Potter Ptg. Co., 1910. 752 p. 12 charts, do. 8vo. (House. No. 1750.) Movement of prices, 1840-1899, from Sauerbeck's tables. London Economist, and reports of U. S. Senate and the Departrrietlt of Labor on prices. (Monthly Summary of Commerce and Finance of the U. S. ser. 1899-1900. no. 11. p. 3129- 3146. Washington, 1900.) Report of British Board of Trade on cost of living in the principal industrial cities of the United States. (U. S. Dept. of Commerce artd Labor. Bureau of Labor. Bull. Washington, 1911. 8vo. 1911. p. 500-570.) Retail prices of food, 1890 to 1904. (Bull. Bureau of Labor. July, 1905. p. 148-301. Washington, 1905.) Retah, prices of food, 1890 to 1905. (Bull. Bureau of Labor. July, 1906. p. 171-316. Washington, 1906.) Retail prices of food, 1890-1907. (U. S. Dept. Commerce and Labor. Bureau of Labor Bull. Washington, 1908. 8vo. no. 11. (July, 1908.) p. 181-332.) Taylor, H. C. The price of farm products. Madison: the University, 1911. 30 p. illus. 8vo. (Wisconsin University. Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin no. 209.) 274 United States. Agriculture Department Prices of farm products. . . . Letter from the Secretary of Agriculture, trans- mitting a series of tables showing the average price on Dec 1 of each year from 1900 to 1909, inclusive, of important crops; and the averages of the monthly range of prices of important crops in certain cities from 1900 to 1909. [Wash- ington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 9 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc. v. 46. no. 49a) United States. Agriculture Department Prices of farm products (In: Yearbook of the Department of Agriculture. 1910. p. 19-26.) United States. Agriculture Department Wages and prices of commodities. [Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 14 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc no. 601. v. 46.) United States. Commerce and Labor Department Increase in cost of food and other products. Letter from the Secretary of Commerce and Labor, transmitting . . . information. . . . [Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 19 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc v. 46. no. 349.) United States. Commerce and Labor Department Retail prices of food in the United States, 1900 to 1907. Wholesale prices of commodities in the United States, 1900 to 1908. Wages and hours of labor in manufacturing industries in the United States, 1900 to 1907. . . . Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910. 34 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc v. 46. no. 436.) United States. Labor Bureau. Wages and prices of commodities. . . . Report of the U. S. Bureau of Labor, giving the monthly prices of commodities from Jan., 1909, to March, 1910. [Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 26 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc. v. 46. no. 549.) United States. Navy Department Prices of commodities in the Navy. . . . Letter from the Secretary of the Navy, transmitting a statement giving the prices paid by vessels of the United States Navy for all kinds of subsistence supplies purchased at foreign ports during the calendar years 1900 to 1909, inclusive. [Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 17 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc v. 46. no. 488.) United States. Wages and Prices of Commodities, Committee on. Prices of food products. Comparison of prices ... in Detroit, Mich., and Windsor, Ontario, taken from the advertisement in the Evening Record, of Windsor, and the Detroit News for Feb. 25, 1910. [Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 1 p. 2 fac-sim. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc v. 46. no. 437.) United States. Wages and Prices of Commodities, Select Committee on. Report . . . pt 1-2. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910. 8vo. (61st cong. 2nd sess. Senate Report 912. pt 1-2.) pt. 1, Lodge report on cost of living, pt 2, Johnston report on cost of living. United States. Wages and Prices of Commodities, Select Committee on (Senate). Investigation relative to wages and prices of commodities. Topical digest of evidence submitted in hearings . . . relative to wages and prices of commodities. Washington : Govt. Prtg. Off., 1910. xcv p. pap. 8vo. 275 United States. Wages and Prices of Commodities, Select Committee to Investigate. Investigation relative to wages and prices of commodities. Hearings held before the select committee of the Senate, relative to wages and prices of commodities. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910. 2 v. in 1. 8vo. v. 1-2 continuously paged. 875 p. Wadlin, Hoeace G. Graded prices. Bostpn: Wright & Potter, state prtrs., 1901. viii p. (1) 2S1-792. pap. 8vo. (Mass. Labor Statistics Bureau.) From the 31st annual report of the Mass. Bureau of Stats, of Labor. Wholesale prices, 1890-1910. (U. S. Dept. of Commerce and Labor. Bureau of Labor Bull. Washington, 1910-11. 8vo. 1910, p. 377-582; 1911, p. 309-499.) WnxsoN, Wallace Cause. . . . Weekly prices of butter on the Elgin board of trade, from 1880 to 1911, in- clusive, with monthly and yearly averages. Butter and egg prices. New York, Chicago, Boston, and Philadelphia, with other statistical information. . . . Comp. by W. C. Willson. . . . Elgin, 111., c. 1912. Yoakum, B. F. "The High Cost of Living." World's Work. Sept., 1912. Canada Coats, R[oberx] H[amilton]. Wholesale prices in Canada, 1890-1909 (inclusive). Special report. Ottawa: Gov. Prtg. Bur., 1910. xiii, 509 p., 114 charts, pap. 8vo. (Canada (Dom.) Labour Department.) McIlvitraith, Jean N. Household budgets abroad. Canada. (Cornhill Maga. v. 17. p. 606-821.) United States. Wages and Prices of Commodities, Committee on. Cost of living in Canada. . . . Letter from the Consul-General at Ottawa, Can., in response to instructions . . . asking him to forward such data as he might be able to obtain in regard to the cost of living in Canada. [Washington : Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 96 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc. v. 46. no. 409.) France Mabch, Lucien. Influence des variations des prix sur le mouvement des depenses menageres a Paris. 3 illus. Soc de statist, de Paris. Jour. v. 51. p. 136-165. Paris, 1910; Levasseur, Emile. Enquete sur le prix des denrees alimentaires en France. 1 illus. (Institut. de France. Acad. d. sci. mor. et polit. Seances et travaux, n. s. v. 72. p. 161-212. Paris, 1909.) Great Britain. Trade, Board of. Cost of living in French towns. Report of an enquiry . . . into working' class rents, housing, and retail prices, together with rates of wages in certain occu- pations in the principal industrial towns of France. London: Darling & Son, ltd., 1909. liv, 430 p. pap. folio. 276 Beaurieux, Noel. Les prix du ble en France au xixe siecle. (Histoire et statistique.) Paris: E. Larose, 1909. 2 p. 1, 108 p., 1 1. 4to. (Universite de Paris. Faculte de droit.) Germany Cost of living of families of moderate income in Ge'rmany in 1907-08. (U. S. Dept. of Colhmerce and Labor. Bureau of Lator Bull. Washington, 1910. 8vo. 1910, p. 697-794.) Geeuch, HeiNmch. Die Preisbildung und Preisehtwicklung ffir Vieh utid Fleisch am Berliner Markte (fiir Schweine). Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1911. 4 p. 1, (1) 6-159 (1) p., 2 diag. 8vo. (Verein fiir Sozialpolitik. Schriften. Bd. 130, Teil 1.) Great Britain. Trade, Board of. Cost of living in German towns. Report of an enquiry by the Board . . . into working class rents, housing, and retail prices, together with the rates of ^ages in certain occupations in the principal industrial towns of the German Empire. With an introductory memorandum and a comparison of conditions. . . . Lon- don: Darling & Son, 1908. Ixi, 548 p., 1 map. pap. folio. (Cd. 4032.) Gschwendtner, Karl. Die Entwicklung der Miinchener Fleischpteise seit Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts und ihre Ursachen. Diessen: J. C. Huber, 1911. 76 p., 1 diagr. 8vo. Prussia. Statistisches Bureau. Monats. und Jahrespreise wichtiger Verpflegungsmittel in 154 preussischen Bericht- sorten im Jahre 1909. Berlin: Verlag des koniglichen Statistischen Landesamts, 1910. 2 p. 1. XV, 196 p. half leath. folio. (Preussische Statistik. Heft 222.) WiRKLicHE und Mittelpreise der wichtigsten Lebensmittel fiir Menschen und Thiere in den bedeutendsten Marktorten der preussischen Monarchie wahrend das Kalenderjahr, 1869. (Kon. preuss. statist. Bureaus. Jahrg. 10, p. 85-87.) [Cont. to date, for pages see index of vols.] Wygodzinski, W. Zur Frage der Viehpreise. (Jahrb. f. Gesetzgeb., Verwaltung u. Volkswirtschaft im Deut. Reich. Jahrg. 30, Heft 3, p. 183-196. Leipzig, 1906.) Great Britain United States. Wages and Prices of Commodities, Committee on. Labor conditions and cost of living. . . . Report on British labor conditions and the cost of living as found in the wage scales secured from union organizations ; also a statement of rates of wages and cost of living in Nova Scotia. [Wash- ington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.]. 7 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc. V. 46. no. 465.) TyszKA, Carl von. Die Bewegung der Preise einiger wichtiger Lebensmittel insonderheit der Fleisch- preise in Deutschland und im Auslande, unter besonderer Berucksichtigung Eng- lands. (Jahrb. fiir Nationalokonomie und Statistik. Jena, 1911. 8vo F 3 Bd. 42. p. 632-665.) 277 Mahin, Frank W., and Albert Halstead. Meat prices in England. Nottingham [and] Birmingham. (U. S. Manufactures Bureau. Weekly consular and trade reports. Washington, 1910. 8vo. v. 1. no. 2. p. S2-SS.) Ireland. Agriculture and Technical Instruction Department. Agricultural prices. A return showing ... (1) the annual average prices for each year, 1881-1909; the annual average prices for each period comprised in the period 1881 to 1909 of S years, 10 years, IS years, 20 years, and 25 years, and for the period of 4 years, 1906 to 1909. . . Dublin: Alexander Thom & Co., Ltd., 1911. 6 p. folio. (H. of C. pap. 93.) Great Britain. Trade Board. Cost of living of the working classes. Report of an enquiry . . . into working class rents, housing, and retail prices, together with the standard rates of wages prevailing in certain occupations in the principal industrial towns of the United Kingdom. . . . London: Darling & Son, 1908. liii, 616 p., 2 maps. pap. folio. (Cd. 3864.) Great Britain. House of Commons. Wages and prices of commodities. . . . Abstract from the proceedings of the House of Commons, April 12, 1910, relative to the "combines investigation act." [Washington : Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 45 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc. v. 46. no. 537.) Other Countries Great Britain. Trade Board. Cost of living in Belgian towns. Report of an inquiry . . . into working class rents, housing, and retail prices, together with the rates and wages in certain occupations in the principal industrial towns of Belgium. . . London: Darling & Son, Ltd., 1910. xli, 218 p., 1 map. pap. folio. Prices of wheat, bread, etc., in Milan, Italy, 1801 to 1908. (U. S. Dept. of Commerce and Labor. Bureau of Labor Bull. Washington, 1910. 8vo. 1910. p. 599-607.) United States. Wages and Prices af Commodities, Committee on. Wages and prices of commodities. Digest of recent statistical publications rela- tive to prices and wages and hours of labor in Austria, Belgium, Bulga.ria, Fin- land, France, Italy, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910. 135 p. Bvo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc. V. 46. no. 631.) ZUPPINGER, C. Mitteilungen iiber die Preise der wichtigsten Lebensmittel und anderer Bedarf- sartikel im Januar, 1909. (Ztschr. f. schweizer. Statist. Bern, 1909. folio. Jahrg. 45. (1909, v. 4.) p. 634-640.) in. MUNICIPAL SLAUGHTERHOUSES AND THE MEAT SUPPLY Ayling, R. Stephen. Public abattoirs; their planning, design, and equipment. London: E. & F. N. Spon, Ltd., 1908. viii, 88 p., 23 plans, 10 pi. 4to. 278 Ayling, R. Stephen. Public abattoirs, illus. (Royal Institute of British Architects. Journal. Lon- don, 1909. 4vo. Series 3. v. 16. p. 189-213.) Beeicht iiber den stadtischen Vieh— und Schlachthof, fiber die stadtische Fleisch- beschau sowie iiber die Fleischvemichtungs — und Verwertungsanstalt bei Riidnitz. (In: Berlin, Germany. Verwaltungsbericht des Ms^strats zu Berlin fur. . . . 1910. Beriin, 1912. folio, no. 41.) Brandt, Paul. Die Fleischversorgung von Karlsruhe, Manheim und Ludwigshafen a. Rh. Karls- ruhe : G. Braun, 1908. 4 p. 1., 141 p. 8vo. ( Volkswirtschaf tL Abhd. d. Badischen Hochschulen. Bd. 9, Heft 6.) Bbeslau. Schlachthof und Viehmarkt zu Breslau. Herausgegeben vom Magistrat der Konigl. Haupt und Residenzstadt Breslau. Breslau: J. U. Kem, 1900. 80 p., 45 plans, illus. folio. Bbooks, Robert C. A German solution of the slaughterhouse problem. (Yale Review. New Haven, 1907. 8vo. V. IS. p. 369-390.) Dittmar, Frederick. Public slaughterhouses (Scotland). Report on the conditions prevailing in Scotland in respect of the provision of public slaughterhouses by local authorities, and as to the methods of meat inspection conducted by various local authorities, with suggestions for improvement. Glasgow: J. Hedderwick & Sons, Ltd., 1908. 82 p. folio. DOHMANN^ Mr. Appropriate refrigeration plants in modern slaughterhouses. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration, 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 490-494.) DuRAND, Edward Dana. The beef industry and the government investigation. New York, 1905. 16 p. 8vo. Repr. : American Monthly Review of Reviews. April, 1905. Edelmann, R. Schlacht- und Viehhofe. (In: Prausnitz, W. Atlas und Lehrbuch der Hygiene mit besonderer Beriicksichtigung der Stadt-Hygiene. Miinchen, 1909. 4vo. p. 639-663.) Ehrler, Joseph. Gemeindeschlaechtereien. (Verein fiir Socialpolitik. Schriften. Leipzig, 1908. Bd. 1281. p. 245-264.) Fareington, a. M. The need of state and municipal meat inspection to supplement federal inspection, illus. (U. S. Animal Industry Bureau. Annual report. 25. 1908. Washington, 1910. p. 83-96.) Gaffney, T. St. John. Municipal slaughterhouse in Dresden. (U. S. Manufactures Bureau. Daily con- sular and trade reports. Washington, 1911. 8vo. Year 14. no. 141. p. 1231.) 279 Germany. Gesundheitsamt. Die Ergebnisse der Schlachtvieh und Fleischbeschau itn Deutschen Reiche im Jahre, 1904. Bearbeitet im Kaiserlichen Gesundheitsamte. Berlin: J. Springer, 1906. 2 p. 1., 135 (1) p. folio. Germany. Statutes. German meat regulations. With original text. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1903. SI p. 8vo. (United States. Animal Industry Bureau. Bulletin no. SO.) Great Britain. Combinations in the Meat Trade Committee. Minutes of evidence taken before the . . . committee . . . with appendices and index to the evidence. London : Jas. Truscott & Son, Ltd., 1909. iv, 34S p. folio. (Cd. 4661.) Greiner, Wilhelm. Die Schlachthofanlagen und ihre maschinellem Einrichtungen. Hannover, 1909. 9S (1) p., 8 Bl- illus. 12vo. (Bibliothek der gesamten Technik. Band 120.) Hall, Louis D. Market classes and grades of meat. Urbana, 1910. 1 pi. 147-290 p. illus. 8vo. (Illinois. Agricultural Experiment Station. Bull. 147.) Heiss, Hugo. The German abattoir, illus. (In: Cash, C. Our slaughterhouse system. . . . London, 1907. 8vo. p. 8S-212.) [HiRScHAUER, Hermann.] The dark side of the beef trust. A treatise concerning the "cahner" cow, the cold storage fowl, the diseased meats, the dopes arid preservatives; and what takes place on the other side of the partitions of the packing houses while the public is being entertained by tinsel and music and a parade of prize steers for government inspection. [Jamestown: T. Z. Root], 190S. 160 p. 12mp. Holmes, George K[irby]. Meat supply and surplus, with consideration of consumption and exports. Wash- ington : Gov. Prtg. Off., 1907. vi, 100 p. 8vo. (U. S. Statistics Bureau, Agricul- ture Dept. Bull. no. SS.) Loverdo, J. DE. L'abattoir moderne de Soissons. illus. (Technique sanitaire. Paris, 1910. folio. Annee 5. p. 73-83.) LOVERDO, J. DE. Les abattoirs publics, v. 1. Paris: H.Dunod et E. Pjnat, 1906. 1 v. illus. 4vo. V. 1. Construction et agencement des abattoirs Dispositions generales. Con- struction. Agencement. Frigorifique. Industries annexes. Abattoirs etrangers. McCabe, George P. The new meat-inspection law and its bearing upon the production and handling of meats. Washington : Gov. Prtg. Off., 1907. 16 p. 8vo. (United States. Ani- mal Industry Bureau. Circular no. 101.) Mahin, Frank M. Municipal abattoir in Amsterdam. (U. S. Manufactures Bureau. Daily consular and trade reports. Washington, 1911. 8vo. Year 14. no. 99. p. 424-42S.) 280 MarteLj H., and Othebs. Les abattoirs publics, par H. Martel, J. De Loverdo [and] Mallet. 2vo. Paris: H. Dunod et E Pinat, 1906. 1 vo. pi. 4to. V. 2. Inspection et administration des abattoirs; installation des marches aux bestiaux. Martel, H. Les abattoirs publics en France. Leur installation au point vue de I'hygiene publique et de la salubrite. (Revue scientifique. Paris, 1908. 4to. Serie S. Tome 10. p. 13-16.) Martel, H. Les abattoirs publics modernes. Ce qu'ils doivent etre pour satisfaire aux exi- gences de I'hygiene et des services d'inspection. (Revue scientifique. Paris, 1908. 4to. Serie S. Tome 10. p. 137-141.) Mayner, William. Model municipal slaughtering establishment at Berlin. A lesson in sanitary meat dressing, illus. (Scientific American. New York, 1906. folio, v. 95. p. 68-69.) Meltin, a. D. The federal meat-inspection service. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1908. 40 p., 15 pi. 8vo. (United States. Animal Industry Bureau. Circular 125.) Repr. : U. S. Animal Industry Bur. Annual report 23. Melvin, a. D. State and municipal meat-inspection and municipal slaughterhouses. Washing- ton: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1912. 1 1., p. 241-254, 1 plan. 8vo. (U. S. Animal Industry Bureau. Circular 185.) Repr. : U. S. Animal Industry Bur. Ann. report 27. Moreau, a. L'abattoir moderne, construction, installation, administration. Preface de M. Lederc, . . . Paris : Asselin et Houzeau, 1906. xvi, 477 p., 1 L illus. 8vo. MORITZ, F. Der Staedtische Schlachthof in Guben. illus. (Zeitschrift ftir Architektur und Ingenieurwesen. Wiesbaden, 1907. folio. Bd. 53. p. 22-38.) MORITZ, F. Der stadtische Schlachthof und Viehmarkt. illus. (In: Posen, Prussia. Die Residenzstadt, Posen, und ihre Verwaltung im Jahre, 1911. [Posen, 1911.] 4to. p. 174-189. National (The) Pbovisionee, the organ of the provision and meat industries of the United States. Published weekly. 18— date. July, 1895— date. New York: The National Provisioner Publishing Co. 4to. New South Wales. Public Works Department. Report upon public abattoirs. [Sydney: W. A. GuUick, 1901.] 28 p., 14 plans, 3 pi. folio. NouvEAUx, Les^ abattoirs municipaux de Dresde. illus. (Technique sanitaire. Paris, 1911. folio. Annee 6. p. 284-294.) Parks, G. H. The sanitary construction and equipment of abattoirs and packing houses. (United States. Animal Industry Bureau. Annual report [no.] 26 Washington, 1911. 8vo. 247-263.) 281 Pennington, M. E., and Others. The comparative rate of decomposition in drawn and undrawn market poultry. By M. E. Pennington, with the collaboration of E. Witmer and H. C. Pierce. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1911. 22 p. 8vo. (United States. Chemistry Bu- reau. Circular no. 70.) Pfister, O., and G. Kokrodi. Der Zentralschlachthof. (In: Zurich (city), Switzerland. Die Gesundheits- und Wohlfahrtspflege der Stadt Ziirich. Zurich, 1909. 8vo. p. 177-194.) Pflueger, Paul, and Joh. Hueppy. Handbuch des schweizerischen Gemeindesozialismus. Ziirich : Buchhandlung des Schweizerischen Griitlivereins, 1910. 267 p., 2 pi. illus. 8vo. p. 130-132. Schlachthauser. Robertson, W[iiiiAM;]. Meat and food inspection, by W. Robertson. With regulations governing meat inspection in the United States by Maximilian Herzog. Chicago : W. T. Keener & Company, 1908. x, 372, 16 p. illus. 8vo. Rommel, George M. The hog industry. Selection, feeding, and management. Recent American ex- perimental work. Statistics of production and trade. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1904. 298 p., 3 maps. 8vo. (United States. Animal Industry Bureau. Bulletin no. 47.) Rothe, a. Das deutsche Fleischergewerbe. Jena: G. Fischer, 1902. 3 pi., 216 p. 8vo. (Staatswiss. Seminar zu Halle a. d. S. Abhandl. Bd. 32.) ScHLACHTHOF. (In : Dessau, Germany. Bericht iiber die Verwaltung und den Stand der Gemeindeangelegenheiten der Haupt — und Residenzstadt Dessau fiir 1. JuU, 1909, bis 30. Juni, 1910. Dessau [1911]. 8vo. p. 43-54.) Staedtischer Vieh- und Schlachthof. (In: Leipzig, Germany, Rath. Verwaltungs- bericht des Rates der Stadt Leipzig fur das Jahr, 1908. Leip?ig, 1909. 4to. p. 345-385.) Stauf. Die Entwickelung des stadtischen Schlacht- und Viehhof es. (In : Posen, Prussia. Die Residenzstadt, Po?en, und ihre Verwaltung im Jahre, 1911. [Posen, 1911.] 4to. p. 190-196.) TissoT, Ed. Les nouveaux abattoirs de la Chaux-de-Fonds. Notice precedee de quelques considerations generales sur les abattoirs suisses. illus. (Technique sanitaire. Paris, 1908. folio. Annee 3. p. 49-62, 77-87.) United States. Corporations, Commissioner of. Report on the beef industry. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1905. xxxvi, 315 p. 8vo. United States. Manufactures Bureau. Municipal markets and slaughterhouses in Europe. Washington : Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910. 117 p. pap. 8vo. (Special consular reports, v. 42. part 3.) Walker, Francis. The "Beef Trust" and the United States Government. (British Economic As- sociation. Economic Journal. London, 1906. 4to. v. 16. p. 491-514.) 282 ZUKHOKST, A. Beitrage zur grossstadtischen Fleischversorgungsfrage. (Archiv. fur Stadtekunde. Stuttgart, 1906. Jahrgang. 1. p. 10-38.) IV. COLD STORAGE OF FOOD PRODUCTS Ahlbeeg, Max. Volkswirtschaft und Gesetzgebung. (Congres international du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1909]. Tome 3. 4to. p. 783-828.) Bryce, p. The science of the preservation of foods by cold. (Sanitary Institute. JournaL London, 1910. 4to. v. 30. p. 20-31.) BUTZLEE, Dr. Changes in the Physical and Morphological Conditions of Foodstuffs (Meat, Fish, and Milk) by Cold. -(In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 363-371.) Cold storage for Iowa grown apples. (Iowa. Agricultural Experiment Station. Ames, 1909. 8vo. Bull. 108. p. 394-414.) CoNGRKS International du Froid. Premier congres international du froid. Paris, S au 12 Octobre, 1908. Paris: Secretariat General de I'Association Internationale du Froid [1908-1909)]. 3v. 4to. Tome 1. Comptes rendus du congres. . . . Tome 2-3. Rapports et communications. Cooper, Madison. Cold storage of eggs. (Congres international du froid. L Rapports et com- munications. Paris [1908]. Tome Z 4vo. p. 737-749.) Cooper, Madison. Eggs in cold storage. Theory and practice in preserving eggs by refrigeration. Data, experiments, hints on construction, etc., from practical experience, with illustrations. Chicago: H. S. Rich & Co., 1899. 88 p. 8vo. David, D. L. Refrigeration of fresh and other meats in transit. (Congres international du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1909]. Tome 3. 4to. p. S89-S93.) Dennis, S. J. The precooling of fruit in the United States. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration, 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 464-486.) Emmett, A. D., AND H. S. Grindley. A preliminary study of the effect of cold storage upon beef and poultry. (Ameri- can Chemical Society. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Easton, 1909. 4to. V. 1. p. 413-435.) Geddes, J. H. Cold storage organization of warehouses and central markets. (Congres inter- national du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1908]. Tome 2. 4to. p. 919-923.) 283 Holmes, Geosge K. Economic results of cold storage. (Ice and Refrigeration. Chicago, 1912. folio. V. 42. p. 36-40.) Holmes, G[eorge] K. Economic results of cold storage. (Special investigation by the United States Department of Agriculture.) (American Warehousemen's Association. Pro- ceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting held at . . . Chicago, 111., Dec. 6th, 7th, and 8th, 1911 .. . [Chicago, 1912]. 8vo. p. 232-249.) HoKNE, Frank A. Legislation affecting cold storage and cold stored products. (Ice and Refrigera- tion. Chicago, 1911. folio, v. 41. p. 180-183.) Hoss, George B. The refrigeration of dairy products and dressed poultry — in transit. (Congres international du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1909]. Tome 3. 4to. p. 594-600.) Ice and Refrigeration. V. 2 to date. (1892— date.) Chicago, 1892— date, folio. Institut du Mois Scientifique et Industrial. Le froid industrial et ses applications. [Prepare et redige par la Section de Mecanique de I'Institut du M. S. I.] Paris: A. Hermann et Fils [1911]. 121 (1) p. illus. 2nd ed. 8vo. (Mois Scien. et Indus. Bibliotheque pratique, no. 2.) International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and pro- ceedings, English edition. Vienna: J. Weiner, 1911. 1167 p. 8vo. Jong, D. A. de. , Les establissements frigorifiques aux abattoirs des Pays-Bas. (Congres inter- national du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1908]. Tome 2. 4to. p. 702-737.) Kaiser, Franz J. Application of cold in public dairy management. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 412-418.) Leeds, J. S. Refrigeration of citrus fruits in transit from California. (Congres international du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1909]. Tome 3. 4to. p. 602- 612.) Lehnert, W. M. Die Kalteerzeugungsanlagen auf dem stadt. Vieh- und Schlachthofe Dresden, illus. (Zeitschrift fiir die gesamte Kalte-Industrie. Miinchen, 1911. 4to. Jahr- gang 18. p. 101-120.) Lescard^, F. The preservation of eggs by refrigeration. (In: International Congress of Re- frigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 406-407.) LiTTLEFIELD AND LiTTLEFIELD. Brief on Senate cold storage bill. Legal opinion on the pending cold storage bill in the United States Senate known as S. 136. (Ice and Refrigeration. Chi- cago, 1911. folio, v. 41. p. 80-83.) 284 Marshall^ Chas. E. The effect of cold storage upon bacteriological and chemical changes in milk and butter as revealed by laboratory investigation in the United States. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and pro- ceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 386-400.) Martel, H. The respective comparative values of frozen and chilled meat from the point of view of general consumption, and more particularly of the provision of the army, the navy, and public and private administrations. (In : International Con- gress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 317-328.) Maktel, H. Les viandes, la volaille, le gibier et le poisson. Conservation par I'emploi du froid. Inspection, illus. (Revue de la societe scientifique d'hygiene alimen- taire. . . . Paris, 1908. 8vo. Tome 5. p. 3-81.) Massachusetts. Cold Storage, Commission on. Report of the commission to investigate the subject of the cold storage of food and of food products kept in cold storage. January, 1912. Boston: Wright & Potter Printing Co., 1912. 308 p., 1 chart. 8vo. (House doc. no. 1733.) Messner, Hans. On the importance of refrigeration for foods, with special consideration of milk. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Re- ports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 421-429.) Nobel, O. K. Die Kuhlanlage in der Stadtiachen Markthalle fiir Fleisch, etc., zu Kopenh^gen, Danemark. illus. (Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Kalte-Industrie. Miinchen, 1911. 4to. Jahrgang 18. p. 63-69.) NouvioK, Georges de. La crise alimentaire et I'indjistrie f rigorifique. (Journal des ficonomistes. Paris, 1912. 4to. Serie 6. Tome 23. p. 62-74.) Pennington, Mary E. Effeets of temperature on chstnges in the flesh <}f poultry. (A^oerican Ware- houseI^en's Association. Proceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting held at . . . Chicago, 111., Dec 6th, 7th, and 8th, 1911. . . . [Chicago, 1912.] 8vo. p. 250-257.) Pennington, Mary E. The refrigeration of poultry and eggs in the United States. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 592-631.) Pennington, Mary E. Up-to-date methods in the handling of poultry and eggs. (Ice and Refrigera- tion. Chicago, 1911. folio, v. 41. p. 178-180.) Pekret, a. H. La conservation des denrees alimentaires par le froid. (Revue de la societe scientifique d'hygiene alimentaire. . . . Paris, 1908. 8vo. Tome 5. p. 426-448.) 285 Powell, G. Harold. The extension of markets through improvements in the handling and in the refrigeration of horticultural products. (Congres intet-national du froid. I. Rap- ports et communications. Paris [1908]. Tome 2. 4to. p. 780-798.) Proctor, P. B. The value of refrigeration in the food supply of the poorer classes. (Congres international du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1909]. Tome 3. 4to. p. 927-931.) Query, Dr. L. C. Changes which may be induced by cold in the physical, chemical, and rrtorpho- logical composition of foodstuffs, especially meat, fish, milk and its products, fruit, etc. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 372-380.) Rapfin and Tharseaud. Contribution a I'etude de la conservation des oeufs par le froid. (Congres in- ternational du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1908]. Tome 2. 4to. p. 754-764.) Reid, Walter C. Cold storage legislation. (Congres international du froid. I. Rapports et com- munications. Paris [1909]. Tome 3. 4to. p. 829-844.) Rogers, L. A. Manufacture of butter for storage. (American Warehousemen's Assotiation. Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting held at . . . Washington, D. C, Dec. 7th, 8th, and 9th, 1910. . . . [Washington, 1911.] 8vo. p. 223-230.) RUDDICK, J. A. Cold storage and the cold storage act. Ottawa, 1910. 27 p. illus. 8vo. (Canada, Dom., Dairy and Cold Storage Commissioner's Branch. Bulletin no. 23.) SuDsiDiES for cold storage warehouses. Ottawa, 1907. 12 p. 8vo. (Canada, Dom., Dairy and Cold Storage Commissioner's Branch. Bulletin no. 16.) SWITZLER, R. H. Cold storage legislation. State and federal. (Ice and Refrigeratibn. Chicago, 1911. folio. V. 41. p. 155-157.) Tait, R. H. Cold storage organization of warehouses and central markets. (Congres inter- national du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1908]. Tome 2. 4vo. p. 1029-1033.) Taylor, William A. The influence of refrigeration on the fruit industry. S pi. (In: United States. Agriculture Department. Yearbook, 1900. Washington, 1901. 8vo. p. 561-580.) Troubridge Critchell, James. Imports of refrigerated food products of the United Kingdom, 1880-1907. Prog- ress and statistics. Congres international du froid. I. Rapports et communica- tions. Paris [1909]. Tome 3. 4to. p. 299-327.) United States. Chemistry Bureau. Use of cold storage. Letter from the Secretary of Agriculture transmitting cer- tain data on cold storage and cold storage products, by Dr. H. W. Wiley, Chief of the Bureau of Chemistry. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910. 23 p., 2 pi. 8vo. (U. S. 61st cong. 2nd sess. Sen. doc. no. 486. v. 60.) 286 United States. Manufactures Committee (Senate). Report of committee and hearings held before the Senate Committee on Manu- factures relative to food held in cold storage. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Oflf., 1911. xii-3-340 p. 8vo. U. S. 61st cong. 3d sess. Senate report 1272. VAmos, Eugen. The meat problem and the refrigerating industry. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 356-362.) Van Der Vaart, S. S. Growth and present status of the refrigerating industry in the United States. (Congres international du froid. I. Rapports et communications. Paris [1909]. Tome 3, 4to. p. 330-350.) VlRY, H. A comparison of the respective values of frozen and chilled meats from the point of view of general provisioning and more especially of provisioning of the army and large bodies. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vietma, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 329-338.) Wanjenbeegh, L. van. The application of mechanical refrigeration to the preservation of fresh and salt meat (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. Svo. p. 401-405.) Weu), L[ouis] D[wight] H[arvell]. Private freight cars and American railways. New York: Columbia University, 1908. 185 p. 8vo. (Columbia Univ. Studies in history, economics, and public law. V. 31, no. 1.) Wiley, H. W. A preliminary study of the effects of cold storage on eggs, quail, and chickens. Washington: (^ov. Prtg. Off., 1908. 117 p., 13 pL Svo. (United States. Chem- istry Bureau. Bull. no. 115.) Zeitschbift fur die gesamte Kalte-Industrie. . . . Unter Mitwirkung hervorragender Gelehrten und Praktiker, herausgegeben won Dr.-Ing. C. Heinel. Miinchen. 4to. Zimmermann, F. W. R Die Kuhllagerung frischer Apfel in den Vereinigten Staaten von Nord-Amerika. (Landwirtschaftliche Jahrbiidier. Berlin, 1904. 4to. v. 33. p. 917-923.) V. TRANSPORTATION OF FOOD PRODUCTS Gmffin, Appleton Prentiss Class. A list of books (with references to periodicals) relating to railroads in their relation to the government and the public, with appendix list of references on the Northern Securities case. Washington : Gov. Prtg. Off., 1904. 1 pi., vi, 5-72 p. 4to. (U. S. Library of Congress.) List op Works on Railways and Agriculture. (Bureau of Railway Economics, Washington, D. C. Railway economics; a col- lective catalogue of books in fourteen American libraries. Chicago [1912] 4to p. 15-16.) 287 New York Public Library. List of works in tiie New York Public Library relating to government control of railroads, rates regulation, etc. (N. Y. Public Library. Astor, Lenox, and Tilden Foundations. Bulletin. New York, 1906. 8vo. v. 10. p. 184-209.) Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. "Reducing the Cost of Food Distribution." Nov., 1913. Philadelphia. Andrews, Frank. Costs of hauling crops from farms to shipping points. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1907. 63 p. 8vo. (United States. Statistics Bureau, Agriculture Dept. Bulletin no. 49.) ' Andrews, Frank. Freight costs and market values. (U. S. Agriculture Dept. Yearbook, 190& Washington, 1907. p. 371-386.) Andrews, Frank. Marketing grain and live stock in the Pacific Coast region. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1911. 94 p. 8vo. (U. S. Statistics Bureau, Agriculture Dept. Bulle- tin 89.) COBBETT, L. C. Influence of transportation on agricultural interests, as illustrated in the truck crops. (In: Bailey, L. H., Cyclopedia of American Agriculture. New York, 1909. v. 4. p. 2S2-2SS.) Dreiser, Theodore. The railroad and the people. A new educational policy now operating in the West. (Harper's Magazine. New York, 1900. v. 100. p. 479-484.) Dugit-Chesal. Quelques reflexions sur le transport des denrees alimentaires. (Revue de la societe scientifique d'hygiene alimentaire. . . . Paris, 1908. 8vo. Tome S. p. 449-456.) Freight charges in England on agricultural products. (U. S. Statistics Division^ Agriculture Department. Miscellaneous series. Bull. no. 12. Washington, 1896. p. 43-53.) Freight charges for ocean transportation of the products of agriculture. Washing- ton: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1896. 42 p. 8vo. (U. S. Statistics Division, Agriculture Department. Miscellaneous series. Bull. no. 12.) * Godfernaux, Raymond. Report no. 3. (All countries except the United States, England, and the Col- onies.) On the question of the conveyance of farm produce to stations on the main railways. . . . (International Railway Congress. Bulletin. Brussels, 1900. v. 142. p. 2537-2568.) Johnson, Emory R[ichabd] and G. G. Heubner. Railroad traffic and rates. New York: D. Appleton & Company, 1911. 2 vy 8vo. (Appleton's Railway Series.) v. 1. The freight service. v. 2. Passenger, express, and mail service. McPherson, Logan G[rant]. , The farmer, the manufacturer, and the railroad. New York: North American Review Pub. Co. [1907]. 13 p. 8vo. Repr. : North American Review, Nov., 1907. 288 McPherson, Logan G[rant]. Railroad freight rates in relation to the industry of the United States. New York: Henry Holt, 1909. xi, 441 p. maps. 8vo. VI. THE DISTRIBUTION OF FOODSTUFFS McPiKE, Eugene F. Transportation of perishable freight in Ainefica. Preserit practice and d'esid'erata. (In: International Congress of Refrigeration. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Repofte and proceedings, English edition! Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 1003-1017.) Newcomb, H. T. Railway progress and agricultural development. (Yale Review. New Haven, 1901. 8vo. V. 9. p. 33-57.) Newcomb, H. T. Railway rates and the cost of living. Washington, D. C, 1906: 28 p. 8vo. NiLssoN, Lauritz. Railway refrigeration cars. (In: International Congress of Refrigferation. 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 979-995.) Question 40. Conveyance of farm produce to stations on the rfiain railways. . . . [Discussions.] (International Railway Congress. Bulletin. Brussels, 1^2. v. 16. p. 853-871.) StetefelDj Rich. Refrigerated railway transportation. (In: International Congress of Refrigera- tion. 2hd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English editidn. Vienna, 1911. Svo. p. 1018-1032.) United States. Interstate Commerce Commission. Freight rates on commodities of life. Letter from the Secretary of the Interstate Commerce Commission . . . transmitting tables showing comparisons of rates from and including 1900 between various points. . . . [Washington: Gov. trtg. Off., 1910.] 18 p. Svo. (U. S. 61. Cong. 2. sess. Sen. doc. v. 46. no 441.) United States. Interstate Commerce Commission. Freight rates on commodities of life. [Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] 18 p. 8vo. (U. S. 61. cong. 2. sess. Sen. doc. no. 441. v. 46.) Ward, Edward G. Milk transportation : freight rates to the largest fifteen cities in the United States. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1903. 60p. 8vo. (U. S. Statistics Bureau, Agri- culture Department. Bulletin no. 25.) Ward, Edward G., and Edwin S. Holmes. Rates of charge for transporting garden truck, with notes on the growth of the industry. Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1901. 86p. Svo. (U. S. Statistics Divi- sion, Agriculture Department. Miscellaneous series. Bull. no. 21.) Weld, L[ouis] D [wight] H[arvell]. Private freight cars and American railways. New York: Columbia University, 1908. 185p. Svo. (Columbia Univ. Studies in history, economics and public law. V. 31. no. 1.) 2g9 Wbndrich, Alfred de. ' Statistics of refrigerated transportation. (In: International Congress of Re- frigeration, 2nd Vienna, 1910. Reports and proceedings, English edition. Vienna, 1911. 8vo. p. 937-944.) VII. COOPERATION, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD PRODUCTS Adams, Edward F[rank]. The modern farmer in his business relations. A study of some of the principles underlying the art of profitable farming and marketing, and of the interests off farmers as affected by modern social and economic conditions and forces. With a chapter by Mr. L. A. Clinton. San Francisco : N. J. Stone Co., 1899. vi, 7-662p. 8vo. p. 202-293. The farmer as a cooperator. p. 434-529. The cooperative fruit marketing societies of California. Bailey, LIiberty] H. The country life movement in the United States. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1911. xi, 220p. 12mo. " p. 149-164. The middleman question. Bkinkmann, Theodor. Die danische Landwirtschaft. Die Entwicklung ihrer Produktion seit dem Auf- treten der internationalen Konkurrenz und ihre Anpassung an der Weltmarkt vermittels genossenschaf tlicher Organisation. Jena : G. Fischer, 1908. ix, , l?7p., 2 diag. 8vo. (Jena. Universitat.-Staatswissenschaftliches Seminar. Abhandlungeri. Bd. 61.) Canada (Dom.) House of Commons. Report of the special committee of the House of Commons,, to whom was referred bill No. 2, an act respecting industrial and cooperative societies. . .. . Ottawa : S. E. Dawson, 1907. xii, 204p. pap. 4to. (App. 3-1907.) Castro, Luiz de. , , . .■ -, V Les associations agricoles en Portugal. [Revue d'ficonomie . Politictt^e. Paris, 1909. 4to. v. 23. p. 604-621.) ' ^- CooPERATioN. ..... Published monthly by the Cooperative Education Bureau t6f';the Right Relationship League], v. 1-date. Minneapolis, 1909-date. 8vo.' ", Cooperation in practice. (Economic Review. London, 1898. 8vo, v. 8. p, 314-325.)-, Cooperative marketing in fruits. (In: Bailey, L, H. Cyclopedia of American agricul- ture. New York, 1909. v. 4. p. 265-267.) ^ Coulter, John Lee. Cooperation among farmers, the keystone of rural prosperity. New York: Sturgis & Walton Company, 1911. 3 p. 1., v-vii p., 2 1., 3-281p., 2 pi. 12mo. (Young farmer's practical library.) Coulter, John Lee. The cooperative farmer, whose organization gives him the best markets to sell in and saves him fifteen or twenty per cent, in buying. Definite experience. (World's work. Garden City, N. Y., 1911. 8vo. v. 23. p. 59-63.) 290 Coulter, 7ohn Lee. Cooperation in the marketing of agricultural produce [with a discussion on agricultural economics.] (American Economic Association. Publications. Prince- ton, 1909. V. 3. p. 258-274.) Ckissey, Fokrest. Cooperation close to the soil. (Everybodjr's Magazine. New York, 1909. v. 21. p. 406-416.) Cross, Ira B. Cooperation in California. (American Economic Review. Princeton, 1911. 8vo. V. 1. p. 535-544.) DUFOURMANTELIE, MaURICE. Agricultural credit. Translated from the French by P. C. Biddle. Philadelphia: Allen, Lane & Scott [cop. 1912.] 1 pi., 43p. 8vo. DuLAc, Albert. Agricultural cooperation in the United Kingdom. (Econ. Rev. London, 1902. V. 12, p. 185-198.) Eyerly, E. K Cooperative movements among farmers. (Amer. Acad, of Political and Social Science. Annals. Philadelphia, 1912. 8vo. v. 40, p. 58-68.) Eyerly, E. K Successful cooperation among fruit growers. (Journal of Political Economy. Chi- cago, 1909. 4to. v. 17. p. 92-95.) Fay, C[harles] R[yle]. Cooperation at home and abroad: a description and analysis. London: P. S. King & Son, 1908. xvi, 403p. 8vo. Fay, C[harl£s] R[yLE]. Small holdings and agricultural cooperation in England. (Quarterly Journal of Economics. Cambridge, 1910. 8vo. v. 24. p. 499-514.) FiNLAY, T. A. Agricultural cooperation in Ireland. (British Economic Association. Economic Journal. London, 1896. 4to. v. 6. p. 204-211.) GiDE, Charles. La cooperation : conferences de propagande. Paris : L. Larose & Forcel, 1900. 1 p. 1., vii, 311p., 2 1. 8vo. GOLDSCHMIDT, CoNRAD. Backereigewerbe und Konsum-Vereine : eine Untersuchung. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta, 1910. viii, 96p. 8vo. (Munchener volkswirtschaftliche Studien. Stuck, 101.) GoRju, Camille. L'evolution cooperative en France. Partie 2. Paris : M. Rivi^e, 1911. 1 v. 12mo. Partie 2. Expose economique des methodes de concentrations dans les co- operatives agricoles de production. Great Britain. Commercial, labour and statistical department. Cooperative societies. Board of trade (Labour department). Report on industrial and agricultural co- operative societies in the United Kingdom, with statistical tables. London: Darling and Son, Ltd., 1912. 1 v., 273p., 3 charts, pap. 8vo. (Cd. 6045.) 291 GsEAT Britain. Foreign Office. Commercial, 1886, no. 20. Report by Her Majesty's representatives abroad, on the system of cooperation in foreign countries. London: Harrison and Sons [1886]. 1 p. 1., 139p. 8vo. In: Great Britain. Parliament. Sessional papers. 1886, v. 67. Gkeat Britain. Labour department. Workmen's cooperative societies. Report on virorkmen's cooperative *societies in the United Kingdom, with statistical tables. London: Darling & Son, Ltd., 1901. xlviii, 2S2p. folio. (Board of Trade.) C. 698. In: Great Britain. Parliament. Sessional papers. 1901. v. 74. Haggard, H. Rideh. Rural Denmark and its lessons. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1911. xi, 335p., 16 pi. 8vo. Harwood, W. S. Five hundred farmers. (Century. New York, 1903. v. 66. p. 98-100.) Hays, Wiixet M. Cooperation in agriculture. [Washington: Gov. Prtg. Off., 1910.] lOp. 8vo. (U. S. 61. cong. 2. sess. Sen. doc no. 294. v. 58.) HiBBARD, B. H. Cooperation in the grain-elevator business. (In: Bailey, L. H. Cyclopedia of American agriculture. New York, 1909. v. 4. p. 267-269.) History of cooperation in the United States. Baltimore, 1888. (Johns Hopkins University Studies in historical and political science, v. 6.) HoLYOAKE, George Jacob. The history of cooperation in England : its literature and its advocates. London : Triibner & Co., 1875-79. 12mo. v. 1. The pioneer period — 1812-1844. V. 2. The constructive period— 1845-1878. International Cooperative Alliance. Bibliographie cooperative Internationale. International cooperative bibliography. AUgemeine genossenschaftliche Bibliographie; publie par . . . I'AlHance co- operative Internationale; the International Cooperative Alliance; der Inter- nationalen Genossenschafts-Allianz. London: the Alliance, 1906. xxiii, 4 1., 276p., 3 tab. 4to. Jackson, Edward. A study in democracy : being an account of the rise and progress in industrial co- operation in Bristol, Manchester: Cooperative Wholesale Society's Printing Works, 1911. xvi, 606p. illus. 12mo. Johnson, Felix S. S. Canadian cooperative fruit associations. (U. S. Manufactures Bureau. Daily consular and trade reports. Washington, 1911. 8vo. Year 14, no. 237. p. 145-149.) King, Bolton. Agricultural cooperation in Italy. (Royal Agricultural Society of England. Journal. London, 1902. 8vo. v. 63. p. 60-75.) 292 Levetus, Mdli^, a. S. Les cooperatives de Gros d'Angleterre et d'Ecosse (1897-1909.) (Rev. d'econo- mie politique. Paris, 1911. 8vo. annee 25, p. 745-764.) LOENING, Edgak. Das englische Genossenschaftsrecht (Jahrbiicher fiir Nationalokonomie und Statistik. Jena, 1912. 8vo. F. 3, Bd. 43, p. 33-64.) McCabe, David A. The recent growth of cooperation in Ireland. (Quarterly Journal of Economics. Boston, 1906. 8vo. v. 20. p. 547-574.) McNeill, A. Cooperation in the marketing of apples. Ottawa, 1907. 28p. 8vo. (Canada, Dom. Dairy and Cold Storage Commissioner's Branch. Bulletin no. 18.) Montgomery, H. de F. Agricultural cooperation in Germany. (Ireland. Agriculture and Technical In- struction Department Journal. Dublin, 1903-1905. 8vo. v. 4, no. 2. p. 214-251. V. 5. no. 1. p. 34-47. v. 6. no. 1. p. 16-23.) MoRMAN, James B. Business cooperative organizations in agriculture. (In: Bailey, L. H. Cyclopedia of American agriculture. New York, 1909. v. 4. p. 255-264. Bibliography, p. 264. ISxTELLER, Friedrich, Dr. of Gehardsbrum. Die geschichtliche Entwicklung des landwirtschaftlichen Genossenschaftswesens in Deutschland von 1848-49 bis zur Gegenwart. Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1901. xx, 5S2p. 8vo. (Wirtschafts-und Verwaltungsstudien mit besonderer Beriicksichtig- ung Bayerns, Bd. 10.) CDoNNELL, Thomas. A trip to Denmark. Dublin: M. H. Gill & Son, Ltd., 1908. 2 p. 1., ii, (1)8-48, iip., 1 1. 8vo. Pals, Max H. van Gilse van der. Das landwirtschaf tliche Genossenschaftswesen in Finland. Ztirich : A. Mark-" walder, 1908. 114p., 2 diag., 1 map, 5 tables. 8vo. Payne, Will. Cooperation that fails. Saturday Evening Post, Feb. 8, 1913; Peters, Thomas Willing. Agricultural cooperation in Bavaria. (U. S. Manufactures Bureau. Daily con- sular and trade reports. Washington, 1911. 8vo. Year 14. no. 121. p. 833-837.)' pLUNKETT, Sir Horace. Agricultural cooperation in Ireland. (Progress, civic, social, industrial. The organ of the British Institute of Social Service. Letchworth, 1906. 8vo. v. 1. no. 2. p. 98-lOS.) Potter, Beatrice. Cooperative (The) movement in Great Britain. London, 1891. 12mo. (Social science series.) Powell, G. Harold. Cooperation in the handling and marketing of fruit (In: United States. Agri- culture Department Yearbook, 1910. Washington, 1911. p. 391-406.) 293 Pratt, Edwin A. The transition in agriculture. New York: E. P. Button and Co., 1906. x, 3S0p., 2 plans, lOpl. 8vo. p. 189-1904. Cooperative fruit-grading. p. 195-206. Marketing problems. Present, The, ideals of cooperation. (British Economic Association. Economic Journal. London, 1902. 4to. v. 12. p. 29-41.) Radfosd, Geo[ege] . Agricultural cooperation. Westminster: P. S. King & Son [1909?] 3 p. 1., 74p. 8vo. (Our Land reprints [v.] 1.) Raffalovich, Arthur. Les associations cooperatives en Allemagne. (Journal des Sconomistes. Paris, 1909. 4to. serie 6. tome 22. p. 227-234.) RiEHN, Reinhold. Das Konsumvereinswesen in Deutschland: seine volkswirtschaftliche und soziale Bedeutung . . . Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta, 1902. xvi, 132p. 8vo. (Miinchener volkswirtschaftliche Studien. ... v. 51.) Rivet, Henri. Les boulangeries cooperatives en France. Paris : Librairie de la Societe du Recueil General des Lois et des Arretes, 1904. 352p. 4to. (Universite de Paris. Faculte de droit.) Dissertation, Paris. Serwy, Victor. Manual pratique de la cooperation. Comment on fonde, on administre et on fait prosperer une cooperative. Gand: Soc. Cooperative Volksdrukkerii, 1903. viii, 9-144p. 8vo. Starrett, Henry P. Formation of Cuba Fruit Exchange. (U. S. Manufactures Bureau. Daily con- sular and trade reports. Washington, 1911. 8vo. Year 14. no. 237. p. 157.) State aid to agricultural cooperation in France. (Ireland. Agriculture and Technical Instruction Department Journal. Dublin, 1909. vi. 10. no. 1. p. 72-79.) State aid to agriculture in Switzerland. (Ireland. Agriculture and Technical In- struction Department. Journal. Dublin, 1910. v. 10. no. 3. p. 499-506.) Surcouf, Joseph. Les societes cooperatives de consommation en France. Rennes; F. Simon, 1902. ix, 243p. 8vo. Vincent, C. Cooperation among western farmers. (Arena. Trenton, 1904. 8vo. v. 31. p. 286-292.) VouTERS, Henry. Le petit commerce contre les grands magasins et les cooperatives de consomma- tion. Paris: A. Rousseau, 1910. 3 p. 1., 205p. 4to. Webb, Catherine. Industrial cooperation; the story of a peaceful revolution. Being an account of the history, theory and practice of the cooperative movement in Great Britain and Ireland. . . . With a preface' by L. L. Price. Manchester: The Cooperative Union, Ltd., 1904. xx, 278p., 1 1. 3 port. 8vo. Bibliography, p. 267-272. Wellivee, Judson C. Eliminating the middleman between farmer and consumer. Munsey's Magazine, April, 1913. Wolff, Henry W. Cooperative ideals. (Economic Review. London, 1899. 8vo. v. 9. p. 42-66.) Wood, D. A. A farmers' trust. How five hundred Iowa farmers organized a corporation to dispose of farm products and to furnish supplies — ^their contest with the middle- men. . . . (World's Work. New York. 1903. v. 6, no. 3. p. 36S1-36S6. illus.) Wood, John Q. Aids to agriculture. Italy. Government schools superintend planting. Qj- operative work. (U. S. Manufactures Bureau. Daily consular and trade reports. Washington, 1910. 8vo. New series, v. 1. no. 33. p. 446-447.) Wygodzinski, W[nxY]. Das Genossenschaftswesen in Deutschland. Leipzig : B. G. Teubner, 1911. vi, 287(l)p. 8vo. (B. G. Teubner's Handbiicher fiir Handel und Gewerbe.) AN ACT To amend the Greater New York Charter, in relation to the establishment, organiza- tion, powers and duties of a department of markets. The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do tnact as follows: • Section 1. Section ninety-six of the Greater New York charter, as reenacted by chapter four hundred and sixty-six of the laws of nineteen hundred and one, is hereby amended to read as follows : 96. Administrative Departments. There shall be the following administrative departments in said city: Department of finance. Law Department. Police Department. Department of water supply, gas and electricity. Department of street cleaning. Department of bridges. Department of parks. Department of public charities. Department of correction. Fire Department. Department of docks and ferries. Department of taxes and assessments. Department of education. Department of Markets. Department of health. Tenement house department Section 2. The Greater New York charter, as reenacted by chapter four hundred and sixty-six of the laws of nineteen hundred and one, is hereby amended by insert- ing therein, after section one hundred and ten, a new section to be section one hun- dred and ten-a, to read as follows: 110-a. Department of Markets. The head of the department of markets shall be called the market board; such board shall consist of five members, who shall be known as market commissioners. Section 3. The Greater New York Charter, as reenacted by chapter four hun- dred and sixty-six of the laws of nineteen hundred and one, is hereby amended by adding thereto a new chapter, to be chapter 18-a thereof, to read as follows : CHAPTER XVIII-a. Department of Markets. Title 1. Organization of department, oflBcers and employees. 2. Powers and duties of department. TITLE 1. Organization of Department, Officers and Employees. Section 1163. Market board; appointment, removal and salaries of members. 1163a. Seal. 1163b. Offices. 1164. Rules and regulations. 1164a. Subordinate officers and employees. 1164b. Transfer from other departments. 1165. Expenses of department. 1163. Market Board, Appointment, Removal and Salaries of Members. The head of the department of markets shall be called the market board; said board shall consist of five members, who shall be known as market commissioners. The mayor shall appoint one of such commissioners for each borough of the City, who shall hold his office as provided in chapter four of this act. Each market commissioner shall be a resident of the borough for which he was appointed at the time of his appointment, and he shall remain a resident thereof throughout his term of office. One of said commissioners shall be the president of the board, and shall be so desig- nated by the mayor. The salaries of the president and the other members of the board shall be fixed by the board of aldermen upon the recommendation of the board of estimate and apportionment. The mayor shall not appoint the president or any other member of the market board until the salary of such president or mem- ber shall have been fixed as herein provided. Within ten days after the appointment and qualification of its president and other members, the market board shall hold its first meeting and organize the department of markets. 1163-a. Seal. The market board may adopt a seal for the department of mar- kets, the form and design of which shall be that of the common seal of the City with the name of the department thereon. The board may cause the seal to be used in the authentication of the orders and proceedings of the department and for such other purposes as the board may prescribe. The courts shall take judicial notice of such seal, and of the signature of the president of the board and of any market commis- sioner. 1163-b. Offices. The principal office of the department of markets shall be in the borough of Manhattan, and the market board shall establish and maintain offices in each of the other boroughs wherein the business and duties of the department shall be performed and discharged under its rules, regulations and control. 1164. Rules and Regulations. The market board may establish and enforce rules and regulations, not inconsistent with the law, for the government of the department of each branch thereof, and of the commissioners and all other officers and employees of the department. 1164-a. Subordinate Officers and Employees. The Market Board shall have the power to appoint a secretary and such subordinate officers as may be necessary for the proper conduct of the offices of the department. Each commissioner shall have power to appoint and remove, subject to the requirements of the Civil Service Law and the rules and regulations of the municipal civil service commissions and the market board, such market masters, market inspectors and other subordinate officers, assistants and employees as may be necessary for the efficient performance of his duties as such commissioner, and every such market master, market inspector, officer, assistant and employee shall be subject to the supervision and control of the commissioner in hi» borough and shall perform such duties as are assigned to him by the commissioner of the market board. Any employee of the department may be punished by the mar- ket board for neglect of duty, for omission to properly perform his duty, for viola- 297 tion of, or neglect or disobedience of orders, or incapacity, or for absence without leave, by forfeiting and withholding pay for a specified time, or by suspension from duty with or without pay. This section shall not be deemed to abridge the right of the board or of a commissioner to remove any market master, market inspector or other subordinate in his borough, as provided in section fifteen hundred and forty- three of this act. 1164-b. Transfers from Other Departments. Upon the organization of the department of markets all employees of every class and grade attached to the ofBce of the president of each borough of the City, who, on the date of the organization of the department of markets as provided in the preceding section, are employed in or about the construction, repair, cleaning and maintenance of public markets, shall then become- employees of like classes and grades of the department of markets, and, as such, shall thereafter continue, subject to the provisions of section 1164-a of this chapter, to perform the duties theretofore performed by them under the supervision of the borough presidents. The collector of city revenue and superintendent of mar- kets shall, on the date of the organization of the department of markets as pro- vided in the preceding section, become superintendent of markets, under the su- pervision of the market board, subject to the provisions of section 1164-a of this chapter. All other employees of every class and grade of the bureau of city revenue and of markets, of the department of finance, who, on the date of the organization of the department of markets as provided in the preceding section, are employed in and about the administration of the public market system of the City, or any part thereof, shall become employees of like class and grade of the department of markets and shall continue, subject to the provisions of section 1164-a of this chapter, to perform the duties theretofore performed by them under the supervision of the comptroller and of the collector of city revenue and superintendent of markets. All employees of the City who shall be transferred to the department of markets, pur- suant to the provisions of this section, shall continue subject to the provisions of sec- tion 1164-a of this chapter, upon the pay rolls of the departments, bureaus or offices from which they shall have been transferred to the department of markets, without loss or reduction of compensation, until provision is made for the payment of their compensation as officers or employees of the department of markets by the board of aldermen and the board of estimate and apportionment 1165. Expenses of Department. The market board may, subject to other pro- visions of this act, make such incidental and additional expenditures as the purposes and provisions of this chapter may require. In order to provide means for the pay- ment of the expenses of the department of markets for the remainder of the year nineteen hundred and fourteen, including the rental of offices for the use of the de- partment and the cost of their equipment, repair and maintenance, and means for the payment of the salaries of the members of the market board and the compensation of the secretary, the market masters, market inspectors and other necessary ofllicers, employees and subordinates of the department during that period, except those for whom other provision is" made in the preceding section of this title, the comptroller of the City of New York, upon the authorization of the board of estimate and appor-f tionment, shall issue and sell revenue bonds to an amount not exceeding one hundred thousand dollars, the proceeds of which, or so much thereof as may be necessary,, shall be applied to the expenses of the department of markets, as herein provided. TITLE 2. ' Powers and Duties of Department. Section 1166. Definitions. 1166a. Jurisdictibn of the department. , 1166b. General powers and duties of market board. 1166c. Selection of sites for new markets. 11664 Wholesale terminal markets. 1166e. Market facilities ; lease of market property. 1166f. Railroad spurs to markets. 1166g. TraflSc regulations. 1166h. Standards, grades and labels. 11661. Certificates as to consignments. 1166J. Delays in transportation. 1166k. Market auctions; auctioneers' licenses. 11661. Consignments to auctioneers. 1166ni. Information bureau. 1166n. Wallabout market II660. Market licenses; existing, continued. 1166p. Licensed venders; street markets. 1166q. Market ordinances continued, subject to change of jurisdiction. 1166. Definitions. Unless otherwise expressly stated, whenever used in this article, the following terms shall respectively be deemed to mean : 1. "Market,", any building, structure or place, the property of the City of New York or under lease to or in the possession of the City used or in- tended to be used, or any part of any street, avenue, parkway, plaza, square or other public place assigned or set apart by law or ordinance or other competent authority to be used as a public market for the buying, selling or keeping for sale of meat, fish or vegetables for human food or of flowers and ornamental plants; 2. "Private market," any store, cellar, stand or place (not being part of a public market) used for the buying, selling or keeping for sal^ of meat, fish or vegetables for human food; 3. "Meat" every part of any land animal and eggs (whether mixed or not with any other substance) ; 4. "Fish," every part of any animal that lives in water, or the flesh of which is not meat; 5. "Vegetable," every article of human food, which (not being meat, fish or milk) is held or offered or intended for sale or consumption as food for human beings. All fish, meat and vegetables found at any place in the City, shall be deemed to be therein and held for sale or consumption as food for human beings, unless the contrary shall be distinctly proved. 1166a. JuiusDicTiON of Department. The department of markets when organized as provided by this act shall have charge and control of all markets, as defined in this title. 1166b. General Powers and Duties of the Market Board. The market board upon the appointment and qualification of its members shall have charge and control of the 1. Repair, cleaning and maintenance of all markets; 2. Administration and management of all markets and the supervision and regulation of all business conducted therein; 3. Collection of all rentals or other revenues for the use of stands, stalls or other spaces in markets by dealers or venders; 4. Construction and equipment of new markets, when authorized by the board of aldermen and the board of estimate and apportionment 299 1166c. Selection of Sites for New Markets. The market board is employed, with the approval of the board of estimate and apportionment, to select, in the name and on behalf of the City of New York, any lands above or under water for markets and market facilities and to acquire title thereto, either in fee or to an easement appertaining thereto, as may be determined by the board of estimate and apportion- ment ; provided, that the proceeding for acquiring title to any property so selected, or any interest therein, shall be taken and conducted in the manner prescribed in chap- ter twenty-one of this act. 1166d. Wholesale Terminal Markets. The market board, within six months after the date of the organization of the department of markets, shall report to the board of estimate and apportionment detailed plans and specifications for the estab- lishment and organization of wholesale terminal markets, not less than one for each borough of the City, which shall be accompanied by certificate of selections of sites therefor, under the hand and seal of the market board, and appropriate maps ac- curately showing the location and transportation facilities of each such site. 1166e. Market Facilities ; Lease of Market Property. The market board shall have power to construct, operate and maintain all necessary facilities for the con- venient transaction of business in wholesale markets or to make contracts for the construction, operation or maintenance of such facilities, for the use and benefit of all dealers, venders or patrons of the markets, by private individuals, partnerships or corporations; subject, however, to the approval of any such contract, amounting to a franchise, by the board of estimate and apportionment or other proper city authority. The market board, with the approval of the board of sinking fund commissioners, shall have the power to lease any market property, other than buildings or parts of buildings in actual use as markets on the date when this act shall take effect, for the construction, use and maintenance of buildings or structures as receiving stations or storage plants for food supplies or other market purposes; provided that every such lease shall be made at the highest market price or rental, at public auction or by sealed bids and always after public advertisement for a period of at least fifteen days, in the City Record, and after appraisal under the direction of the board of sinking fund commissioners, made within three months of the date of such lease, and, provided further, that no such lease shall run for a term longer than ten years nor a renewal for a longer period than ten years. Each such lease shall contain covenants that any market dealer or vender, or the owner or proprietor of any pri- vate market, shall be entitled to rent space in any such receiving station, or to store meat, fish or vegetables in any such storage plant at reasonable rates, the schedule of which shall be subject to the control of the market board, and shall be conspicu- ously posted at all times in every receiving station or storage plant established or maintained under the provisions of this section. 1166f. Railroad Spurs to Markets. The board of estimate and apportionment, with the approval of the mayor, is hereby empowered to grant and issue a permit to any railroad corporation operating in the City of New York, to construct, operate and maintain a single-track railroad spur from its main line tracks to and into any market or market property of the City for the purpose of transporting freight cars or express cars containing meat, fish, vegetables, fruit or dairy products, to such mar- ket and to remove empty cars therefrom; but no such permit shall be granted or issued permitting the occupation or use of any street or streets by any such railroad spur for a greater distance than three hundred feet, nor for a longer period than three years from the time of granting thereof. Each such permit shall provide that the same may be cancelled, annulled and revoked upon three months' notice in writing by the mayor to the railroad corporation constructing, operating and maintaining such spur, and that, thereupon, the right of such corporation in and upon the street or streets occupied by the spur shall cease and determine and the said track shall be • 300 forthwith removed therefrom by said corporation, which shall restore the pavement, roadway and sidewalk of such street or streets to a usable and safe condition, at its own expense and without delay. In case any railroad corporation shall refuse or fail to discontinue and cease using any such railroad spur, and shall refuse or fail to remove the rails, ties and other appurtenances of such spur from any street or streets, within ten days after the right of such corporation to maintain and use the said spur shall have ceased and determined by written notice of the mayor, or other- wise, the president of the borough in which such railroad spur is located shall forth- with tear up and remove the rails, ties and other appurtenances of such spur and restore the pavement, roadway and sidewalk of the street or streets previously occu- pied by it to a usable and safe condition, and the expense of such removal of the spur, and the restoration of the pavement, roadway and sidewalks occupied by it, shall be recoverable by the City from the said railroad corporation by an action at law. 1166-g. Traffic Regulations. The market board shall make such necessary rules and regulations regulating traffic in and about terminal and other markets as it may deem necessary. 1166-h. Standards, Grades and Labels. The market board shall have power to establish standards and grades for different classes of food supplies and to grant and issue permits to use labels or symbols of such standards and grades to all producers and shippers who conform to standards and grades established by the board. 116I-i. Certificates as to Consignments. The consignor or consignee of any meat, fish or vegetables consigned to any market after the organization of the depart- ment of markets shall be entitled to have the same examined by a market inspector when it shall have been received at any market The inspector shall immediately report a detailed description in writing of the consignment and the condition thereof at the time of his examination to the market master or person in charge of the market at which the same was received, and shall issue a certificate to the consignee thereof as to the condition of the consignment when received at the market, and a duplicate of such certificate shall be sent without delay to the consignor. Any such certificate shall be competent evidence in any court of the State of New York. 1166- j. Delays in Transportation. Upon receiving complaints or information from any shipper that meat, fish or vegetables, consigned to a market, auctioneer or merchant in the City of New York for sale, have been delayed in transit by any common carrier, the market board shall at once institute an investigation as to the cause of such delay, and willful or unnecessary delays shall be made the subject of a special investigation and prosecution. The market board is empowered to direct the immediate sale of consignments made in its care when such action is necessary to prevent the loss thereof. The board shall investigate complaints respecting matters within its jurisdiction and shall make such original investigations as may be deemed necessary concerning the existence of combinations in restraint of trade or other vio- lations of law, and shall take due steps to have such violations prosecuted. 1166-k. Market Auctions; Auctioneers' Licenses. The market board shall have power to grant licenses to any person engaged in the business of auctioneer of meat, fish or vegetables at a market as defined by section 1166 of this act, or desiring to be so engaged, on the payment by such person of a license fee of $100 per annum, and filing a bond, to be approved by the board, with two good sureties in the penal sura of $5,000. No auctioneer licensed under the provisions of this section shall be personally interested, directly or indirectly, in the sale of meat, fish or vegetables, except as auctioneer and to the extent of his legal fees and charges as such. The market board on complaint of any person having been defrauded by any such auc- tioneer, or by his clerk, agent or assignee, is authorized and directed to take testimony under oath relating thereto, and if the charge shall be sustained, in the opinion of the 301 board, it shall revoke the licenses granted such auctioneer and direct that his bond be forfeited. No person, persons, corporation, partnership or association shall here^ after carry on the business of auctioneer of any meat, fish or vegetables at a market as defined by section 1166 of this act in the City of New York without having first obtained from the market board a license authorizing such person, persons, corpora- tion, partnership or association to carry on such business, and no person, persons, corporation, partnership or association whose license shall have been revoked for cause shall be licensed to carry on the business of auctioneer. Any person, persons, corporation, partnership or association who shall sell or offer for sale any meat, fish or vegetable at vendue or auction at a market as defined by section 1166 of this act, without having first obtained from the market board a license authorizing such person, persons. Corporation, partnership or association to carry on the business of auctioneer of meat, fish or vegetables, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon con- viction thereof shall be imprisoned for not more than six months or by a fine not exceeding $500, or by both such fine and imprisonment 1166-1. Consignments to Auctioneers. Meat, fish or vegetables may be con- signed directly to auctioneers licensed by the market board for sale at venue or auction, and shall after receipt be so sold as soon as possible, but the City of New York shall not be liable for loss or injury of any such consignment or part thereof. The market board shall provide space and. accommodation for the care of all such consignments to any person, persons, corporation, partnership or association doing business at a market as defined in section 1166 of this act, and book entries of the receipt and sale thereof shall be made by the auctioneer showing the name of the consignor, the name and address of each purchaser or purchasers of any part thereof, and the amount or amounts received therefor. The auctioneer shall deduct all proper charges against such consignment and his commission as fixed by the schedule estab- lished by rule and regulation of the market board, and he shall thereupon transmit the balance of the proceeds of such sale or sales to the consignor, but nothing herein contained shall confer on said market board the right to fix the charges or commis- sions of any person, persons, corporation, partnership or association doing business at a private market. 1166-m. Information Bureau. The market board shall organize and maintain a free bureau of information, for the use and convenience of producers and con- sumers and for general information, as to the supply of and price for meat, fish and vegetables, with lists of reputable shippers and buyers, commission merchants and auctioneers, and such information tending to facilitate and cheapen food distribution in the City of New York as the board shall deem it expedient to disseminate. 1166-n. Wallabout Market. The portion of Wallabout Market commonly, known as farmers' square shall be kept for the exclusive use of farmers and market gardeners. Upon the organization of the market department the market board shall have and be vested with all the powers exercised by the commissioner of city works of the former city of Brooklyn, and shall have the sole power to lease any portion of said market lands and renew existing leases on such terms and at such rentals as may be agreed upon between the board and the lessees or holders, subject to the following provisions as to the rate of rent: In case the amount of rent for any renewal term of any lease be not agreed upon as afore- said by the first day of January preceding the expiration of the previous term, the same shall, if either the market board or the lessee or holder shall so elect, be fixed as now provided by law except that the rent may be reduced in the discretion of the market board. The rents for such renewal terms, whether agreed upon as above provided, or fixed as now provided by law, shall not be less than an amount equal to two-thirds of the rent of the preceding term, nor exceed an amount equal to the rent of the preceding term and one-third thereof in addition thereto. The market board 302 may at any time, with the consent of the lessee or holder, vary or modify any of the provisions of any lease of such lands. The board may also adjust and settle any claims and controversies in regard to rent or any matters that appertain to any lease, both those which have heretofore arisen and any which may hereafter arise, during either the original term, or any renewal or extension thereof, as in its opinion justice may require. Nothing herein contained shall interfere with the jurisdiction of the department of docks and ferries of the City of New York over the piers, bulkheads and water front in and around said Wallabout market lands, nor with the jurisdiction of the president of the borough of Brooklyn over said Wallabout market lands, so far as concerns his power over highways. On and after the thirtieth day of April, nineteen hundred and four, distilled and rectified spirits, wine and fermented and malt liquors shall not be sold or offered for sale in Wallabout market lands ; and all leases of any portion of such lands, granted under the provisions of this section, shall con- tain a provision restricting and prohibiting the sale or offering for sale of any such spirits, wine and fermented and malt liquors on any lands leased thereby, and on and after the passage of this act the state commissioner of excise shall not issue or re- new any certificate permitting or authorizing the sale of distilled or rectified spirits, wine and fermented and malt liquors within the limits of said Wallabout market lands or in any portion thereof. 1166-0. Market Licenses; Existing, Continued. Upon the organization of the department of markets the market board shall have sole charge and control of every public market place and of the wagons engaged in the business of vending and selling farm and garden produce therein and elsewhere in the City, with full power to make suitable regulations concerning fees, the hours during which said business shall be conducted and the general management of the same. Subsequent to the organization of the department of markets any farmer, market gardener or other person desiring to vend or sell meat, fish or vegetables in any market shall present to the market board an application stating his name, occupation and a general descrip- tion of the commodities which he desires to sell in such market, with the request that a license be issued to him for that purpose. On filing such application and paying the fee fixed by the market board, the board may issue to the applicant a license to use such space in such market, for a period to be designated in the permit, and not to exceed one year. Each market license shall be numbered and registered in the depart- ment of markets, and the market board shall issue to each licensee a metallic tag or plate with the number of the license thereon in such form and design as the board may prescribe. No unlicensed person shall be permitted to vend or sell meat, fish, vegetables or any other commodity, in any market, and each licensee while vending or selling in any market shall at all times cause his license tag or plate to be con- spicuously displayed. All licenses heretofore issued by the comptroller or by the collector of city revenue and the superintendent of markets, and in full force and eflfect on the date when this act shall take effect, shall be continued to the end of the term for which they were respectively issued, subject to the power of the market board to revoke or renew the same. 1166-p. Licensed Venders ; Street Markets. Upon the organization of the department of markets the market board shall have charge and control of the vending and selling of meat, fish, vegetables, fruit, plants or flowers upon the streets, or in other public places, by farmers, market gardeners, peddlers and pushcart dealers, each of whom shall obtain from the market board upon the organization of the department of markets a license to vend and sell said commodities before en- gaging in such business in anj street or public place, which license shall be numbered and registered in the department of markets. The market board shall issue to each licensed vender a metallic tag or plate with the number of the license thereon, in such 303 form and design as the board may prescribe, which tag or plate the licensee shall at all times conspicuously display when vending or selling upon any street or in any public place. The market board shall from time to time recommend to the board of estimate and apportionment such open spaces in the City as may be advantageously set apart as markets for farmers, market gardeners, peddlers, and pushcart dealers, and, thereupon, the board of estimate and apportionment shall have power to desig- nate and set apart such places, or any of them, as markets for the use of farmers, market gardeners, peddlers and pushcart dealers, subject to such conditions and limitations as it may prescribe. 1166-q. Market Ordinances Continued, Subject to Change of Juiusdiction. All provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of New York relating to public markets of the City and to carts, wagons or other vehicles in which any garden prod- uce or other thing shall be brought to market are hereby continued, subject to the power and authority of the board of aldermen to add to, alter or otherwise amend or to repeal the same; provided, that all powers and duties conferred or imposed upon the comptroller or the collector of city revenue and the superintendent of mar- kets, respecting public markets or market carts, wagons or other vehicles, by any existing provision of the Code of Ordinances, shall, from and after the date of the organization of the department of markets, be exercised and performed by the market board, or the market master, market inspectors or such other employees of the department of markets as the rules and regulations thereof may prescribe. Section 4. Section thirty-four of the Greater New York Charter, as reenacted by chapter four hundred and sixty-six of the laws of nineteen hundred and one and amended by chapter five hundred and fifty-three of the laws of nineteen hundred and ten, is hereby amended to read as follows: "34. Licenses to Auctioneers. Subsequent to the organization of the department of markets as provided in this act the city clerk shall have authority to grant licenses to any person engaged in and carrying on the business and occupation of auctioneer, except auctioneers of meat, fish and vegetables as such commodities are defined in il66 of this act, carrying on their business at a market as defined by section 1166 of this act, or desiring to be so engaged, on payment of the sum of one hundred dollars per annum, on such person filing a bond, approved by him, with two good sureties in- the penal sum of two thousand dollars. The president of the board of aldermen on complaint of any person having been defrauded by any auctioi\eer except auctioneers of meat, fish and vegetables as such commodities are defined in section Il66 of this act, carrying on their business at a market as defined by section 1166 of this act, or by the clerk, agent or assignee of such auctioneer, doing business in said City, is authorized and directed to take testimony under oath relating thereto ; and if the charge shall, in his opinion, be sustained, he shall revoke the license granted to such auctioneer, and direct his bond to be forfeited. No person, persons, corpora- tion or association shall hereafter carry on the business of auctioneer, except auc- tioneers of meat, fish and vegetables as such commodities are defined in section ii66 of this act, carrying on their business at a market as defined by section 1166 of this act, in the City of New York, without having first obtained from the city clerk a license authorizing such person, persons, corporation or association to carry on the business of auctioneer; and no person, corporation or association whose license has been revoked for cause shall again be licensed to carry on the business of auctioneer. Any person or persons, corporation, partnership or association who shall offer for sale, or sell goods of any description, wares, merchandise, real or personal property, except meat, fish or vegetables as defined in section Ii66 of this act, at a market as defined by section 1166 of this act, at vendue or auction without having first obtained from the city clerk a license authorizing such person or persons, corporation, partner- ship or association to carry on the business of auctioneer, shall be guilty of a misde- 304 meaner, and upon conviction thereof shall pay a fine of not less than twenty^five nor more than one hundred dollars for each offense. But nothing in this section shall apply to a duly appointed marshal of the City of New York who, by virtue of his office by levy under legal process, sells goods, wares and merchandise or real or personal property, thus levied upon by him under such process." Section 5. Upon the organization of the department of markets, as provided' by this act, the jurisdiction of the comptroller of the nianagement of markets, and of the renting of stalls or stands therein and of the granting of permits and the collec- tion of rents therefor, shall cease and all such jurisdiction shall thereafter devolve upon the market board. And, likewise, upon the organization of the department of markets as aforesaid, the jurisdiction of the president of each of the boroughs of the City of the construction, repairs, cleaning and maintenance of markets shall cease and all such jurisdiction shall thereafter devolve upon the market board. Section 6. This act shall take effect immediately. INDEX Abattoirs, in Berlin, 88; in London, 86; in Munich, 90; in New York, 32. Advisory Committee, 7. Ambulant trade in Berlin, 109. American Cities, Public Markets in, J. F. Carter, 67. American Hawaiian Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 39. American Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 34. Amsterdam, markets of, 93. Anchor Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 34, 37. Andrews, Frank, "Transportation and its Relation to Retail Prices,'' 119. Apples, freight charges on, 120; grading and packing of, 141 ; handling of, 135 ; sources of supply, 9. Aspegren, John, 7. Atlantic Fruit Company, terminals >and foodstuffs handled, 35. Atlantic Transport Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 34. Auction- sales of foodstuffs, 23, 191 ; of California fruits, 31, 214; in foreign cities, 86, 90, 92, 264; recommended for New York, 25. Austria- American Steamship Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 38. Austria-Hungary, markets of, 93. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 30, 214, 260. Baltimore, markets of, 67. Bananas, handling of, 135 ; sources of supply, 9. Bangs, Mrs. Bleecker, 8. Bankers, Commission merchants as, 231. Barge Terminal at Greenpoint, 8. Beck, Walter J., testimony of, 242. Behrenberg, William H., testimony of, 228. Belgium, markets of, 94. Benedict, H. H., testimony of, 223. Bennett, G. L., "A Study of Markets and the Marketing of Foodstuffs," 147. Berlin, cost and income of markets, 97; history of market system of, 95 ; mar- kets of, 87; retail municipal markets of, 21, 106. Bibliography, 265. Bill creating Department of Markets for New York, Proposed, 295. Birmingham, England, markets of, 87. Black, Mrs. Elmer, 7; "Foreign Mar- kets," 85. Blackberries, grading and packing of, 140. Board of Aldermen, jurisdiction in mar- kets, 23. Board of Health, condemnation of food- stuffs, 252, 255 ; jurisdiction in mar- kets, 23. Board of Market Commissioners, pro- posed, 23. Booth Steamship Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 36. Borough Presidents, jurisdiction in mar- kets, 23. Boston, freight service to, 259; trolley freight service, 132. Boynton, Edward B., 7. Brief and Plans for a new West Wash- ington and Gansevoort Market, 57. Bronx, Borough of The, market condi- tions in, 16, 258; needs of, 213, 223; tes- timony on, 243, 244. Bronx Market, Proposed, description of, 49; estimated business in, 55; estimated cost and income, 24, 52; recommended by Market Commission, 25 ; value to suburban places, 258. Brooks, Franklin, 7. Brussels, markets of, 94. Buckle, John, 7. Buda-Pesth, markets of, 93. 306 Buffalo, markets of, 67. Bureau of Weights and Measures, juris- diction in markets, 23. Bush Terminal Company, 38. Butter, amount brought by Pennsylvania Railroad, 30; average receipts in New York market, 235. Cabbage, freight charges on, 120; grading and packing of, 143. California fruit, handling of, 135; mar- ket, 15, 31, 214. Canning and preserving establishments, 157, 169- Canteloupes, grading and packing of, 142. Carloads of foodstuffs, average size, 53; number received in busy season, 15, 60, 225. Carlot markets in the United States, 121. Carriers, relative speed and costs, 155, 196. Carter, J. F., "Public Markets in Amer- ican Cities," 67. Cash vs. Credit, 171. Cauliflower, marketing of, 145 ; season of, 215 ; sources of supply, 9. Celery, freight charges on, 120; grading and packing of, 144. Central Vermont Railway, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 32. Central wholesale market, advantages of, 229; concentrating power, 102. Chain stores, 241. Chelsea Association of Merchants and Manufacturers, 8, 57. Cherries, grading and packing of, 140. Cincinnati, markets of, 69. Qeveland, markets of, 68. Clyde Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 30. Clyde West Indian Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37. Coffee market, 36. Cold Storage, see Refrigeration. Cologne, Germany, markets of, 89, 262. Columbus, Ohio, markets of, 70. Commission merchants, business of, 10, 194, 224; commission, 233; expenses of, 231; legislation concerning, 10; mini- mum sale, 228. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, ter- minals and foodstuffs handled, 34. Compania Transatlantica, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 35. Competition, effects of, 150. Concentrating power of central market, 52, 102. Congestion at terminals, 15, 61, 213, 219, 221, 222, 234. Consumers, 21, 117, 160; demands of, 239; ignorance of conditions of produc- tion, 256. Con-sumption of foodstuffs in New York, 8, 30, 54. 55, 60, 62, 166, 225. Co-operation, of consumers, 163, 183; of producers, 10, 139, 156, 201; bibliogra- phy, 289. Cost of living, 13, 239; waterways and, 124; bibliography, 271. Costs, of production, 12, 131, 151, 238; of retailing, 13, 21, 180; of transporta- tion, 12, 119, 126, 155. Crop reports, 131, 151. Crops, distribution of, 215. Cucumbers, grading and packing of, 143. Cunard Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 34. Cuneo Steamship Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 36. Currants, grading and packing of, 141. Das^ton, Ohio, markets of, 70. Delancey Street Market, 19; financial statement, 4& Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Rail- road, IS, 32. Delivery, 13, 176. Demurrage, 222. Denver, markets of, 70. Department of Markets for New York City, Proposed Bill creating, 295; rec- ommended by Market Commission, 25. Departments now having jurisdiction in public markets, 23. Des Moines, markets of, 71. Deterioration of foodstuffs in transit, 154^ Detroit, markets of, 71. Distribution of crops, 145, 149, 156, 215. Distribution of foodstuffs, distance car- ried, 9, 119, 252; in New York, 14, 20, 227; facilitated by centralization of re- ceipts, 112; by trolley freight, 129; bibliography, 288. Diversion of shipments, 122, 130. 307 Division of Markets in the United States Department of Agriculture, 202. Docks and Ferries, Department of, juris- diction in markets, 23. Dowie, Harry, testimony of, 231. Dubuque, Iowa, markets of, 71. Duluth, markets of, 71. Dunkak, Henry, 7; testimony of, 234. Dressier, George, testimony of, 235. Droege, "Freight Terminals and Trains,'' quoted, 208. Eastman, W. C, testimony of, 220. Egg Plants, grading and packing of, 144. Eggs, collection from farmers, 256; han- dling of, 23s; production and market- ing of, 168, 233; amount brought by Pennsylvania Railroad, 30; refrigera- tion of, 232. Erie Railroad, 15, 31; fruit auction, 214; terminals, 219. Existing Steamship and Railroad Ter- minals in the City of New York, W. G. Rainsford, 29. Fabre Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 38. "Farm" on West Street, use of, 212. Farmers' associations, 10, 145, 156; ef- fect on markets, 240. Farmers' markets, 61, 240; in Wallabout Market, 20; number of farm wagons coming to New York, 14; plans for in proposed new West Washington Mar- ket, s8. Farming, cost of labor, 238; grading, packing and marketing of produce, 139; loss of time in marketing goods, 134; increase in farm values, 131 ; on Staten Island, 260 ; present methods of market- ing crops, 9. Farm trains, 217. Fast freight service, 120. Finance, Department of, jurisdiction in markets, 23. Financial Statement of Public Markets of New York, S. A. Goodacre, 42. Fire Department, jurisdiction in markets, 23. Fish Market, 33. Fleischl, Emil, 7. Flour, freight charges on, 119. Food prices, bibliography, 271. Food supply, responsibility of city gov- ernment concerning, 115. Food values, 165. Foodstuffs, amount received in New York, 8, 30, 54, 55, 60, 62, 166, 225. Foodstuffs destroyed by the Board of Health, 252, 255. Foreign Markets, Mrs. Elmer Black, 85. Fort Wayne, Indiana, markets of, 71. France, markets of, gi. Frankfort, Germany, markets of, 90; de- velopment of waterways, 126. Freight by trolley, 129. Freight cars, percentage of time in use, 208. Freight, methods of handling, S9- Freight rates, 29, 119, 124, 130. Friedland, Jacob M., "Provisioning Metropolitan Populations with Fresh Foodstuffs," 95. Fulton Market, 17; financial statement, 46. Funch, Edye and Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37, 38. Gansevoort Market, 14, 18; financial statement, 48 ; plans for new, 57. Gansevoort Market Business Men's As- sociation, 7, 24, 57. Germany, markets of, 87, 262. Goodacre, Sidney A., "Financial State- ment of the Public Markets of the City of New York," 42. Gooseberries, grading and packing of, 141. Grading, Packing and Marketing of Farm Produce, L. J. Lippmann, 139. Grand Rapids, markets of, 72. Grapefruit, grading and packing of, 142; sources of supply, 9. Green Peas, grading and packing of, 143. Greenpoint, possible site for a market, 25. Greenpoint Taxpayers' and Citizens' As- sociation, 8. Greenwich Village Public Service Com- mittee, 8, 57. Greensburg, Pa., markets of, 72. Hagerstown, Md., markets of, 72. Hamburg, Germany, markets of, 89, 263. Hamburg-American Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 35. 308 Hamilton, Ohio, markets of, 72. Hamilton, Ont., markets of, 72. Handling of foodstuffs, 251. Harlem Market, 11, 14, 16. Hartford and New York Transportation Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 36. Haslop, Charles, 7; testimony of, 241. Havre, markets of, 92. Health, Department of, jurisdiction in markets, 23. Heath, Mrs. Julian, 7. Hellenic Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37. Holland, markets of, 93. Home, Frank A., testimony of, 246. Huckleberries, grading and packing of, 141. Ice, 33- Indianapolis, markets of, 73; trolley freight service, 132. Industrial railroad proposed for The Bronx, 49. Insular Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37. Jefferson Market, 18; financial state- ment, 47. Jobbers, 11. Joliet, markets of, 73. June, J. G., testimony of, 219. Kalamazoo, markets of, 73. Kansas City, Kan., markets of, 73. Kansas City, Mo., markets of, 74. Kidderminster, England, markets of, 87. King, Clyde L., "Trolley Freight," 129. Koelsch, Carl A., 7. f Lamport and Holt Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 36. Lancaster, Pa., markets of, 74. Lange, Edgar, "Provisioning Metropoli- tan Populations with Fresh Food- stuffs," 95. La Veloce Navigazione Italia a Vapore, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 35. Lawrence, Richard W., 7. Legislation requiring registration of com- mission merchants, 10. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 32. Lethbridge, Ont., markets of, 74. Lettuce, grading and packing of, 144. Lewis, Nelson P., 7. Lichtenfels, William, testimony of, 243. Lincoln, Neb., markets of, 74. Lippmann, L. J., 7, 8; "The Grading, Packing and Marketing of Farm Pro- duce," 139.. Little Rock, markets of, 75. Live poultry market, 18; site proposed, 19. Live stock, freight charges on, 119. Liverpool, England, markets of, 87. Loaders, 245. London, market system of, 85, 96. Long Island City market, 25. Long Island Railroad, 15, 32. Loss through bad handling, 63. Louisville, Ky., markets of, 75. Lloyd Brazillieno, 38. Lyons, markets of, 92. Madison, Wis., markets of, 75. Mallory Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 30. Manchester, England, markets of, 87. Mandarines, grading and packing of, 142. Market Commission, membership, 7; ob- jects and work, 7; recommendations, 24; testimony taken by, 211. Market hours, 30, 218, 226, 243, 259. Marketing farm produce, 9, 60, 62, 139, 147; farmers' loss of time in, 134; pro- ducer to consumer, 122; refrigeration at market center, 135 ; waste of present system, 252; bibliography, 265. Market organization, 203; requirements for buildings, 207. Markets, Foreign, Mrs. Elmer Black, 85; Berlin, 95 ; Germany, 262 ; London, 96 ; Paris, 95 ; Vienna, 97. Markets, primary and secondary in New York, 14; summary of conditions, 8. Markets, Public, in American Cities, J. F. Carter, 67; market dock in Jackson- ville, Fla., 128. Markets, Public in New York, 17; divi- sion of jui'isdiction in, 236; financial statement, 42 ; proposed system, 20. Marquard, Franz, testimony of, 262. McAneny, Hon. George, 7. Meat, cost of, 167; freight charges on, 119; supply, 158; bibliography, 277. Memphis, markets of, 75. Michael, M. C, testimony of, 246. 309 Middlemen, 219, 257 ; classification of, 10 ; services of, 216, 240. Milk, 167. Milwaukee, markets of, 75. Miller, Hon. Cyrus C, 7. Mitchel, Hon. John Purroy, 7. Montgomery, Ala., markets of, ^6. Mt. Vernon, 25 ; relation to Bronx Mar- ket, so. Mullan, Mrs. George V., 7. Munich, markets of, 90, 262. Municipal retail markets, 21, 229, 238; vs. private stores in Berlin, 114. Municipal sales agents, 103. Municipal Slaughterhouses and Meat Supply, bibliography, 277. Munson Line, terminals and foodstuflfs handled, 35. Nashville, markets of, 76. Newark, markets of, 76. New Brunswick, N. J., markets of, yy. New Orleans, markets of, 76. New Rochelle, 25 ; relation to Bronx Market, SO. New York and Cuba Mail Steamship Company, terminals and foodstuflfs handled, 35, 36. New York and Demerara Steamship Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37- New York and Porto Rico Steamship Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37. New York Central Railroad, is, 31 ; ter- minals, 211. New York Dock Company, 36. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad, is, 32; terminals, 223. New York, Ontario and Western Rail- road, 32. New York, sources of supply, 9, 121'. Niagara Falls, markets of, TJ. Nixon, Mrs. Lewis, 7. Norfolk, Va., markets of, TJ. Norristown, Pa., markets of, 77. Norton and Son, terminals and food- stuffs handled, 38. Oklahoma City, markets of, yy. Old Dominion Steamship Company, 30, 217. Omaha, markets of, 78. Onions, sources of supply, g. Open markets in New York, 31. Open pier, 39. Oranges, freight charges on, 120; grad- ing and packing of, 142; sources of supply, 9. Osborn, William Church, 7. Otis, George S., 7. Ottawa, Ont., markets of, 78. Oyster market, 33. Package goods, 13, 186. Packing farm produce, 139. Panama Steamship Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 33. Parcel post, 123. Paris, market system of, 21, 91, 95. Patterson, William R., 7. Peaches, distribution of, 216; freight charges on, 120; grading and packing of, 141. Pears, grading and packing of, 141. Pennington, Dr. Mary E., 8, 62, 139, 2SI ; "Refrigeration at the Market Center," I3S- Pennsylvania Railroad, is ; terminals, 30, 220; foodstuffs handled, 30, 229. Perishable goods, effect of refrigeration, 247; freight service on, 121; marketing of, 62, 130; refrigeration in shipping, I3S- Philadelphia, markets of, 78; Reading Terminal Market, 182. Pickich, Peter A., testimony of, 244. Pierce Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37. Pineapples, grading and packing of, 142. Pittsburgh, markets of, 79, 214. Plums, grading and packing of, 141. Police Department, jurisdiction in mar- kets, 23. Portsmouth, Va., markets of, 79. Potatoes, freight charges on, 120; grad- ing and packing of, 144; sources of supply, 9. Poultry, grading and packing of, 144; preparation for market, 2SS ; refrigera- tion of, 232. Pre-cooling system, 2S7. Premiums, 163. Prices, 12, 229, 243 ; determination of, 120, 129, 204, 234; effect of ban- 310 dling facilities, 226; increments, 224, 228, 259; increase due to refrigeration, 250; influence of consumers' ignorance, 256; in Berlin, 113; wholesale, 193; bibliography, 271. Primary food market in New York, 14. Prince Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37, 38. Private markets vs. municipal in Berlin, 109. Produce commission business, 224. Produce trains, 23. Producers, associations, 201 ; problems and methods of, 150. Production, costs of, 12, 131, 151, 238; effect of terminal market on, 64. Proposed market system for New York, 20; Bronx Market, 49; West Wash- ington and Gansevoort Markets, 57. Provisioning Metropolitan Populations with Fresh Foodstuffs, Edgar Lange, PS- Public Markets in American Cities, J. F. Carter, 67. Public Markets in New York, 17; finan- cial statement, 42; departments having jurisdiction in, 23, 236. Quebec Steamship Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 30. Quinces, grading and packing of, 141. Railroad delivery, 224. Railroad terminals in New York, 29. Railroads, trolley lines as feeders for, 133. Rainsford, W. G., "Existing Steamship and Railroad Terminals in the City of New York," 29. Raleigh, N. C, markets of, 79. Raspberries, grading and packing of, 140. Reading Terminal Market, Philadelphia, 182. Rebates, 226, 246. Recommendations of Market Commis- sion, 24. Red "D" Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 36. Red Star Line, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 34. Reeve, Sidney A., testimony of, 260. Refrigeration, 131, 246; at the market center, 135; average length of time goods held, 249; cost, 232; extended use of, 261 ; financial methods, 249 ; ef- fect of time limits, 248; effect on prices, 247; in New York, 232; neces- sity of in market, 208; bibliography, 282. Re-icing, 222. Reid, Joseph E., testimony of, 224. Remington, J. D., testimony of, 211. Retail distribution, 11, 6t, 237; in New York, 17; needs of consumers, 160; in Germany, 87, 263; in Paris, 21, 91; in London, 85, 96; municipal markets in Berlin, 21, 87, 99, 106. Retailer, the, 170; control of prices, 159; expenses, 225; methods of selling, 174; purchasing by, 171. Retailing, costs of, 13, 21, 180; service in- cluded in, II, 202; testimony on, 237. Ridimond, Borough of, market condi- tions in, 16, 260; recommendations con- cerning, 25. Rotterdam, markets of, 94. San Antonio, Texas, markets of, 80. Schenectady, markets of, 81. Seasons of production, 120, 252. Seattle, markets of, 81. Sherbrooke, markets of, 81. Shipments, diversion of, 122, 130. Shippers, 10, 233. Shipping in bulk, 187. Slaughterhouses and meat supply, bibli- ography, 277. Smith, Joseph E., 7. Smith, R. A. C, 7. Sources of supply of New York, 9, 121. South Bend, Indiana, markets of, 82. Southern Pacific Steamship Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 33. Spiegelberg, Mrs. Flora, 7. Spokane, markets of, 82. Springfield, Mass., markets of, 82. Stadtlander, George, testimony of, 239. Stamberger, George, testimony of, 245. State Food Investigating Commission, Committee on Markets, Prices and Costs, 8, 54, 166. Staten Island, see Richmond, Borough of. Steamship terminals in New York, 29, 33. Steeneck, John, testimony of, 237. St. George, site for market, 25. St. John, N. B., markets of, 80. 311 St. Joseph, Mo., markets of, 80. St. Louis, markets of, 80. St. Paul, markets of, 80. Strawberries, grading and packing of, 140; season of, 215. Streets, traffic capacity of, 199. String beans, grading and packing of, 143. Study of Markets and the Marketing of Foodstuffs, A., by G. L. Bennett, 147. Suburban places, difficulty in getting sup- plies, 258. Summary of market conditions in New York, 8. Syracuse, markets of, 82. Tangerines, grading and packing of, 142. Terminals, steamship and railroad in New York, 29, 31, 211, 219. Terminal wholesale markets in New York, 21; continuity of use, 222; esti- mated business, 55. . Testimony taken by the Market Commis- sion, 211. Thompson, S. A., "Waterways and Cost of Living," 124. Tillsonburg, Ont., markets of, 83. Toledo, markets of, 83. Tomatoes, grading and packing of, 143; sources of supply, 121. Toms, Elizabeth I., 7. Toronto, markets of, 83. Traffic capacity of streets, 199. Transportation of foodstuffs, agencies coming to New York, 14; costs, 12, 126, 155; means, 152; relation to retail prices, 119; by trolley, 129; testimony on, 211; bibliography, 286. Travers City, Mich., markets of, 83. Trinidad Shipping and Trading Com- pany, terminals and foodstuffs han- dled, 37. Trolley Freight, C. L. King, 129; for Staten Island, 261. Trucking, 15, 61, 195; costs of, 63, 229, 234; expenses of, 246; rates, 226, 245; testimony on, 245. Trucks, insulated and refrigerated, 254. United Fruit Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 35. United States Department of Agricul- ture, Division of Markets, 202. Uranium Steamship Company, terminals and foodstuffs handled, 37. Vegetable market, 29; pier, 29, 221; on Old Dominion pier, 30. Vegetables, sources of supply, 9, 121. Vehicles used in food transportation, 196. Vienna, market system of, 93, 97. Wagon delivery, cost of, 123. Wallabout Basin, terminals on, 20. Wallabout Market, 11, 14, 15, 19, 24; ef- fort to create a union terminal, 235; financial statement, 43. Washington Market, 17; financial state- ment, 45 ; testimony on, 242. Washington, Pa., markets of, 83. Waste of marketing system, 227, 252. Watermelons, grading and packing of, 141. Watertown, N. Y., markets of, 84. Waterways and Cost of Living, S. A. Thompson, 124. Westchester Avenue Market, 14. West Washington Market, 14, 18; finan- cial statement, 44; plans for new, 57. West Washington Market Association, 8, 57- Wheeling, markets of, 84. White Star Line, terminals and food- stuffs handled, 34. Wholesale market, the, 190, 224; impor- tance of, 182; necessary features, 115. Wholesalers, 10. Wichita, Kan., markets of, 84. Williamson, Charles C, "Bibliography," 265. Yonkers, 25, 218; relation of to Bronx Market, 50. Zanesville, Ohio, markets of, 84. Zipf, George P., testimony of, 258.