(Jnrttf U ICam Bd^aal Sibtarg Cornell University Library KFN5039.D84 Code annotations :being a memorandum of 3 1924 021 899 418 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924021899418 REFERENCES TO DECISIONS UNDER THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Title.— PeiTy vs People, 86 N. Y., 353; 62 How., 148. Holmes vs McDowell, ;5 Hun, 585. In re Robinson, 10 Daly, 148. §2.— People vs Marshall, 7 Abb. N. C, 880. Laws 1878, ch. 83. Laws 1879, ch. 53. Laws 1880, ch. 344. Laws 1881, ch. 401. Laws 1882, ch. 103; 1882, ch. 352. People ex rel Lowenbein vs Donohue, 15 Hun, 418, S. C, 56 How., 155. People ex rel. Board of Charities vs Davis. 15 Hun, 209. § 3.— Laws 1881, ch. 343. Beer vs Benner, 3 MoC. C. P., 266; 2 Browne C. P., 362. S4. — Tyng vs Marsh. 42 Super. Ct., J. & S. , 235. Mutual Life Insurance Co. vs Bigler 9 Week, Dig., 507; S. C, 21 Alb. L. J., 334. Beer vs Benner, 2 MoC. C. P., 366; 3 Browne C. P., 862. Hollenbeck vs Donnell, 94 N. Y., 342. §5.— Amended 1879. §6. ) 7.— In re attorney, 83 N. Y., 164. § 8. — People ex rel. Kelly vs Aikin, 19 Hun, 338. People ex rel. Pries vs Riley, 25 Hun, 588. People ex rel. Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children vs Gilmore. 26 Hun, 1 . People ex rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 90 N. Y., 402; 3 Browne C. P., 379; 1 McC. C. P., 484; 15 Week. Dig., 207. Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 265. CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 9.— People ex rel. Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children vs Gilmore, 26 Hud, 1. People ex rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 90 N. Y., 403; 2 Browne C. P., 379; 1 McC. C. P., 484; 15 Week. Dig., 307. Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 365. §10,— Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 265. t< 1 1.— Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 265. j 12.— Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 365. ! 13.— Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Brov/ne C. P., 365. § 14, — Ryckman vs Ryckman, 19 Week. Dig., 41. Randall vs Dusenberry, 41 Super. Ct., J. & S., 457. Watson vs Nelson, 69 N. Y., 536. People ex rel. Fi-ies vs Riley, 35 Hun, 587. Clark vs Bininger, 75 N. Y., 344. Park vs Park, 80 N. Y., 156. Rutherford vs Holmes. 66 N. Y., 368. Dunford vs Weaver, 84 N. Y., 445. Fischer vs Raab, 81 N. Y., 335; S. C. 56 How., 318. Tremain vs Richardson, 68 N. Y., 617. People ex rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 63 How., 115; S. C, 1 Civ. Pro. R., 484; 90 N. Y., 402; 2 Browne C. P., 379. Shelp vs Morrison, 13 Hun, 110. The Mayor of New York vs N. Y. & S. I. Ferry Co., 64 N. Y., 623. Tinkey vs Langdon, 60 How., 180. McComb vs Weaver, 11 Hun, 271. McKelsey vs Lewis, 3 Abb. N. C, 61. A. & P. Telegraph Co. vs B. & O. R. R., 46 Super. Ct., 377; S. C, 87 N. Y., 855. In re Attorney, 87 N. Y., 521. Boucicault vs Boucicault, 21 Hun, 431; 59 How., 131. VanValkenburgh vs Doolittle, 4 Abb. N. C, 72. In re Friedman, 37 Hun, 301. O'Gara vs Kearney, 57 How., 439; 77 N. Y., 423. Schulte vs Anderson, 48 Super. Ct., 133. In re Stockbridge and Marvin, 58 How., 138; 10 Daly, 33. Eagan vs Lynch, 3 Browne C. P., 236; 49 Super. Ct., 454. HiUs vs Peekskill Savings Bank, 30 Hun, 546. Sec- ond National Bank vs Dunn, 3 Browne C. P., 359. Nathans vs Hope, 5 Browne C. P., 401. Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 368. Hall vs U. S. Reflector Co., 4 Browne C. P., 148. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. §15.— Morrison vs Lester, l.i Hun. 538. Mack vs Cohn, 37 Hun, 463; 2 Browne C. 123. Gillies vs Kreuder, 1 Dem., 849. Hall vs U. S. Reflector Co., 4 Browne C. P., 148. §16. § ly.— The People ex rel. Mayor, &c., vs Nichols, 79 N. Y., 582. Gormerly vs Mc- Glynn, 84 N. Y., 284. People vs Bruff, 9 Abb. N. C, 153. Martin vs Lowenstein, 68 N. Y., 456. McCue vsO'Hara, 5Redf., 336. In re Leffingwell, 30 Hun, 528. ;18. 519. §20. 5 21. ;22. §23.— Douglas vs Haberstro, 88 N. Y., 611; 2 Browne C. P., 186; 25 Hun, 262; 62 How., 457. § 24. — Mason & Hamlin Organ Co. vs Pugsley, 19 Hun, 392. Heilner vs Walsh, 47 Super. Ct., 369. People ea; reZ. Utleyvs Seaton, 35 Hun, 305. Douglas vs Haberstro, 25 Hun, 262; S. C, 63 How., 457; 88 N. Y., 611; 3 Browne C. P., 186. §25.— Kelly vs Christal, 16 Hun, 343; 81 N. Y., 619. People ex rel. Jackson vs Mc- Adam, 59 How, 465. § 26.— Woodruff vs Imperial Fire Insurance Co., 90 N. Y., 521. CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §27. §28. ;29. §30. §31. §32. §33. §34. -People vs Clews, 4 Abb. N. C, 256. §35. §36. j37.— /?i re Wadley, 39 Hun, 12. ^38. §39. §40. §41. )42. 543. §44. § 45.— Kelly vs Christal, 16 Hun, 242; S. C, 81 N. Y., 619. § 46.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 234, p. 338. Matter of Dodge and S. Manufacturing Co., 77 N. Y., 101. Wigand vs Dejonge, 8 Abb. N. C, 260. Bell vs Vernooy, 18 Hun, 125. In re Probate will of Hancock, 37 Hun, 78. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. §47. §48. §49." §50. §51. j 52. — People ex rel. Jackson vs McAdam, 59 How., 465. §53. — People ex rel. Jackson vs McAdam, 59 How., 465. §54. §55.— Ormsby ys Jacques, 13 Hun, 443. Mack vs City of Buffalo, 87 N. Y., 184. McBratney vs E. W. & O. R. R. Co., 87 N. Y., 467. Met. Concert Garden Co. vs Abbey, 5 Browne C. P., 26. §56.— Jto re Beggs 67 N. Y., 120. In re Burchard, 27 Hun, 429. §57.— Jw re Burchard, 27 Hun, 429. §58. )59. ^60. 561. ;62. §63.— Amended 1879. Newberger vs Campbell, 58 How., 313. §64. — Newberger vs Campbell, 58 How., 313. § 65. — Hickox vs Weaver, 15 Hun, 375. 'O CODE ANNOTATIONS_ REFERRIN£^TO— mrr— "^ §66.— Amended 1879. TuUis vs BmshneU, 65 How., 465; IS Week. Dig., 131. Lansing vs Ensign, 63 How., 63. Parker vs Spear, id., 394; 49 Super. Ct., 1. Ennis vs Curry, 61 How., 1; 33 Hun, 584. Eberhardt vs Schusler, 10 Abb. N. C, 391. In re Wilson & Greig, 3 McC. C. P. 151; 3 Browne C. P. 348. Jones vs Baston, 11 Abb. N. C, 114. Moloughney vs Cavanaugh, 3 Browne C. P. 258. Jenkins vs Adams, 33 Hun, 600. Dimick vs Cooley, 3 Browne, C. P., 141. McCabe vs Fogg, 60 How.. 488. Pierson vs SafiEord, 80 Hun, 531. Albert Palmer Co. vs VanOrden, 49 Super. Ct., 89; 64 How., 79: 4 Browne C. P., 44. In re Bailey, 4 Browne C. P., 140; 5 id., 353. Merchant vs Sessions, 5 Browne C. P., 34. Coster vs Greenpoint Ferry Co., id., 146. Naylor vs Lane, id., 149; and notes 153, 154. Newberg vs Schwab, id., 19. § 67.— In re Attorney, 86 N. Y., 563. §68. §69. sro. iTl. STa. i$ 73.— Moses vs McDivitt, 3 Abb. N. C, 47. Guillotel vs Mayor, &c., of New "York, 10 Abb. N. C, 818. Newberg vs Schwab, 5 Browne C. P., 19. Gescheidt vs Quirk, id., 38. § 74.— Amended 1879. Fowler vs Callan, 4 Browne C. P., 413. §75. §76.— Moses vs McDivitt, 3 Abb. N. C, 47. "§777" CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. II §78. i^s. §80. §81. §83. §83.- -Horrocks vs Thompson, 27 Hun, 144. § 84. — Horrocks vs Thompson, 27 Hun, 144. §85. §86.— Wright vs Nostrand, 58 How., 184. §87. >§8. 5 89. — Amended lb79. §»o. §91.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 389, p. .567. 592. §93.— Amended 1884, ch. 398, p. 480. §94.— Guillotel vs Mayor &o., of New York, 10 Abb. N. C. 818. §95^ §96. ~§9r §08. §99. 12 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §ioo. §101. § 102.— Steffin vs Steffin, 4 Browne O. P., 179. §103. §104. ;105. §106. §107. §10§.— Amended 1879. Cross vs Williams, 13 Week. Dig., 436. S109. g 1 10.— McCallum vs Barnard, 58 How., 169. Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 265. § 111. — Repealed laws 1882, ch. 405, sec. 1, p. 576. People ex rel. Eiedman vs McCue, 18 Hun, 54. Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 365. g 112.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 405, sec. 2, p. 576. Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 265. §113. §114. §115. §116. Tii7. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 13 )119. §120. ;i2i. !l22. §123. §124. Yl25." il26. 5127. S12S. ;129. 8 ISO. § 131.— Werckman vs Werckman, 4 Browne C. P., 146. § 132. — Werckman vs Werckman, 4 Browne C. P , 146. "§133. §134. §136. l'T3§. -^ "§i414S. § 149.— Wemple vs Glaviu, 57 How., 109. Levy vs Kaine, 55 How., 136. McCaUum vs Barnard, 58 How., 169. Allen vs AUen, 58 How., 381. Boucicault vs Boucicault, .'59' How., 131, 31 Hun, 431. People ex rel Browne vs VanHoesen, 63 How., 76. §150.— Levy vs Kaine, 55 How., 186. ,151. il52. il53. § 1 54.— Cosgrove vs Bows, 3 Browne C. P., 61. § 155.— Wemple vs G-lavin, 57 How., 109. Richmond vs Praine, 34 Hun., 578. Dunford vs Weaver, 84 N. Y., 445; 31 Hun., 349. .156. il57. § 15§. -Dunford vs Weaver, 31 Hun, 349; S. C, 84 N. Y., 445. Nehresheimer vs Bo we, 3 Browne C. P., 368. Cosgrove vs Bowe, 10 Daly, 353. CODE OF CIVIL fROCEDURE. 15 )159 §160. il61. ^162. 163. §164 § 165. S166. §167. §16§. §169. §i7o: giy»- § 17a. — Douglass vs Wanen, 5S How., a64. §173. ___ 1775^ §T76^ ~%rff. §178. "§Tra § 'i§o: §i»i. 1 6 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE il§2. § 1§3.— Toles vs Adee, 84 N. Y., 222. Kohn vs Burtnett, 59 How., 410. § 1§4.— Union Dime Savings Inst, vs Anderson, 19 Hun, 310; S. C, 83 N. Y., 174. §185. § 186.— Union Dime Savings Inst, vs Anderson, S3 N. Y., 174; 19 Hun, 310. § 187.— Toles vs Adee, 84 N. Y., 222. §188. il89. § 1 90,— Amended laves 1882, ch. 61, by adding Sub., 4. Eaynor vs Raynor 94 N Y , 248. Rogers vs Sandy Hill, 94 N. Y., 638. Laverence vs Farley, 73 N. Y., 187. Eoe vs Boyle, 81 N. Y., 305. Jones vs Ludlum, 74 N. Y., 61. St. Clair vs Day, 15 Week. Dig 117. Campbell vs Cotton Exchange, 47 Super. Ct., 558. Walker vs Spencer 86 k y' 162. The People eic re?, vs Smith, 85 N. Y., 638. Victory vs Blood, 98 N. Y., 650. Liddeii vs Paton, 67 N. Y., 393. Hewlett vs Wood, id., 394. The People ex rel. Waidman vs Pohce Commissioners, 82 N. Y., 506. Patten vs N. Y. El. R. R. Co., 67 N. Y.,484. Whit- tlesey vs Hognet, 66 N. Y., 358. Piatt vs Piatt, id., 360. Sartwell vs Field, 68 N. Y 341. Attorney General vs Continental Life Ins. Co., id., 348. McHenry vs' Jewett 90 N. Y., 58. Jwre eprsfalls, 77N. Y., 514. Whitney vs Townsend, 7 Hun, 333; S C aJBE'd 67 N. Y., 40. In re Moore, 67 N. Y., 556. In re Freeholders of Irondequoit, 68 N y' 376 People ex rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 90 N. Y., 402: 1 McC. C. P., 484; 2 Browne C. P ' 379 Newton vs Russell, 87 N. Y., 527. Martin vs Windsor Hotel Co., 53 How 422 In re Friedman, 83 N. Y., 6)9. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1/ 8191.— Wheeler vs Scofield, 67 ,N. Y., 311. Koosevelt vs Linkert, id., 447. Hiscock vs Harris, 80 N. Y., 403. Conger vs. Conger, 77 N. Y., 433. Josuez vs Conner, 75 N. Y., 156. Wiley vs Brigham, 81 N. Y., 13. VanGelder vs VanGelder, id., 128. Roe vs Boyle, id., 305. Pi-oduce Bank vs Morton, 40 Super. Ct., 338; overruled in part, 67 N. Y., 199. Hamilton vs Third Avenue R. R. Co., 41 Super. Ct., 588. Scully vs Sanders, 77 N. Y., 598. Burdette vs Lowe, 85 N. Y., 341; S. C, 23 Hun, 588. Williams vs W. U. Tel. Co., 93 N. Y., 163. St. Clair vs Day, 89 N. Y., 357. Raynor vs Raynor, 94 N. Y.. 248. Rogers vs Sandy Hill, 94 N. Y., 638. American Hosiery Co., vs Riley, 18 Abb. N. C. 389. Crawford vs West Side Bank, 98 N. Y., 631. Payne vs Becker, 87, N. Y., 153. Shaw vs McCarty, 3 Browne C. P.. 83. §192. §193.— Gormerly vs McGlynn, 84 N. Y., 384. §194.— Godfrey vs Moser, 66 N. Y., 350. Burdett vs Lowe, 85 N. Y., 341. Hiscock vs Harris, 80 N. Y., 403. U93. §196. §197. §19§.— Jones vs Jones, 81 N. Y., 35. §199. t^aoo. §201 §202. §203. 1 8 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §204. g 205. §206. §207. §208. §209. §210. §211.— Little vs Banks, 85 N. Y., 358. §212. §213, §214, §215. §21«. §217.— People ex rel Mayor. &c., vs Nichols, 79 N. Y., 583; 58 How., 200. Granger vs Craig, 85 N. Y., 619. Price vs Brown 10 Abb. N. C, 67. §218, §219, §220. §221. §222, § 223.— People vs Petrea, 30 Hun, "§ 22 Hun, 1; 35 id., 363. §596. — Johnson vs Meyer, IT Hun, 382. § 597.— Johnson vs Meyer, 17 Hun. 2o->. §59§. -Douglas vs Habestro, 88 N. Y., 611; 2 Browne C. P., 186; 63 How., 45 j: 25 Hun, 262. §599.- Douglas vs Haberstro. 88 N. Y., 611; 62 How., 455; 2 Browne C. P., 186; 25 Hun, 262; 19 id., 1. Godfrey vs Pell, 49 Super. Ct.. 206: 4 Browne C. P., 448 South- ern Navigation Co. vs Sherwin, 1 Civ. Pro. Rep.. 46. §600.— Lawrence vs Foxwell. 4!l Super. Ct , 506; iit. 37H; id., 378: 4 Browne C. P.. 840; id., 851. Nehresheimer vs Hnwp, 3 Browne C. P.. ?63. Walsh vs Schulz, 5 Browne C. P., 357. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 55 §601.— Douglas vs Haberstro, 59 How., 194; 88 N. Y., 611. Mills vs Hildreth, 81 N. Y., 91. Obregon vs DeMier, 54 How., 390. Walsh vb Schulz, 5 Browne C. P , 357. §602.— Troy & Boston R. R. Co., vs Boston, H. T. & W. R. R. Co., 13 Hun, 60. Buf- falo Grape Sugar Co., vs Alberger, 22 Hun, 349. Power vs Village of Athens, 19 Hun, 165. § 603.— Chatterton vs Chreitler, 2 Abb. N. C, 453. Buffalo Grape Sugar Co., vs Alberger, 33 Hun, 349. McHenry vs Jewett, 90 N. Y., 58; 15 Week. Dig., 295; 36 Hun, 453. Stamm vs Bostwick, 30 Hun, 70; 2 MoC. C. P., 467. Clinton Liberal Inst., vs Fletcher. 55 How., 431. Negus vs City ofi Brooklyn, 1 McC. C. P., 471. §604. — Mutual Life Insurance Co., vs National Bank of Newburg, 18 Hun, 371. Buffalo Grape Sugar Co., vs.Alberger, 22 Hun, 349. McHenry vs Jewett, 36 Hun 453; 15 Week. Dig., 395; 90 N. Y., 58. Bates vs Plonsky, 3 McC. C. P., 331. Cassel vs Fisk, 2 McC. C. P., 341; 3 Browne C. P., 94. Stamm vs Bostwick, 2 McC. C. P., 467; 30 Hun, 70. Clinton Liberal Inst, vs Fletcher, 55 How., 431. Jerome Co., vs Loeb, 59 How., 508. §605. §606.— People ex rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 90 N. Y., 403; 1 McC. C. P., 484; 3 Browne C. P., 379. Babcock vs Clark, 23 Hun, 391. § 607. — Rule 13. Tammien vs Clause, 67 Barb., 430. People ex rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 1 McC. C. P., 484; 90 N. Y., 403; 3 Browne C. P., 379. 56 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 608.— Spears vs Matthews, 66 N. Y.. 127. Stamm vs Bostwick, 65 How., 358; i Hun, 70; 2 McC. C. P., 467. §609.— Met. El., R. R. Co., vs Man. R. R. Co., 2 McC. C. P., 473. People e.r i-d. Negus vs Dwyer, 90 N. Y., 402; 1 McC. C. P., 484. s^ 610.— Rule 4. People e.r rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 90 N. Y., 402; 1 McC. C. P., 484. §611.— The People vs White, 28 Hun, 289. S612. §613.— Packer vs Nevjn, 67 N. Y.. 550. Eastman vs Star, 22 Hun, 465. VanGelder vs VanGelder, 2(5 Hun. 356. Fullan vs Hooper, 66 How., 7'>. S614. S615. §616. §617. §61§.- —Eastman vs Starr , 22 Hun, 465. VanGelder vs VanGelder, 26 Hun, 356. §619. § 620.— Musgrave vs Sherwood, '16 N. Y., 194. The N. Y., W. S. & B. R. R. Co..vs Omerod, 29 Hun, 274. Fourth National Bank vs Scott, 31 Hun, 301. McCall vs Frith, 2 Browne C. P., 9. Kleinpeter vs Enell, 2 Browne C. P., 21. Pratt vs Underwood. 4 Browne C. P., 167. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 57 ;621. §622.— Repealed 1877. S623.— Talmer vs Foley, 8 Abb. N. C, 191; 8. C, 42 Super. Ot. J. & S., 365. Jacobs vs Miller, 11 Hun, 441. Benedict vs Benedict, 76 N. Y., 600. Pacher vs Nevin, 67 N. Y., 550. Waterbury vs Bouker, 10 Hun, 263. Randall vs Carpenter, 47 Super. Ct., 205. Benedict vs Dixon, 47 Super. Ct., 477. Fourth National Bank vs Scott, 31 Hun, 301. HoweU vs MiUer, 5 Browne C. P., 164. §624. §625.— Fourth National Bank vs Scott, 31 Hun, 301. 5 626.— Coffin vs Pros. Park & Coney Island R. R. Co., 61 Hqw., 105. § 627.— Amended 1879. Jacobs vs MiUer, 10 Hun, 230. Zellenkoflf vs Collins, 28 Hun, 156. §62§.— McCarthy vs McCarthy, 13 Hun, 579. § 629.— Amended 1883, ch. 404, p. 576. Amended 1884, ch. 401, p. 483. Chamberlain vs B., N. Y. & P. R, R. Co., 31 Hun, 339. Met. El. R. R. Co., vs Man. R. R. Co., 3 McC. C. P., 473; 65 How., 277; id., 319. Williams vs W. U. Tel. Co., 65 How., 326. McCarthy vs McCarthy, 13 Hun, 579. § 6SO.— McEncroe vs Decker, 58 How., 250. §631.— Repealed 1877. § 632.— Repealed 1877. 58 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §683.— Repealed 1877. § 634.— Repealed 1877. §635.— Union Mining Co. vs Raht, 9 Hun, 208. Clark vs Boreel, 31 Hun, 594. Bogart vs Dart, 25 Hun, 395. Taylor vs Reid, 54 How., 27. Weiler vs Schreiber, 11 Abb N. C, 175; 63 How., 491. Wittner vs VonMinden, 37 Hun, 234 Pomeroy vs Ricketts S7 Hun, 242; 91 N. Y., 668. Pickhardt vs Antony, 27 Hun, 269. Hamilton vs Penny, S9 Hun, 265. Alford vs Cobb, 28 Hun, 22. Remington Paper Co. vs O'Dougherty, 32 Hun 255; 19 Week. Dig., 53. Hirsch vs Hutchinson, 3 Browne C. P., 106; 64 How., 366! Aohelis vs Kalman, 60 How., 491. Partridge vs Brown, 19 Week. Dig., 434. Smadbeok vs Sisson, 66 How., 220; 4 Browne C. P.. 353. §636.— Anthony vs Stype, 19 Hun, 265. DonneU vs Williams, 21 Hun, 216; 59 How., 68. Milliken vs Dart, 26 Hun, 24. Achelis vs Kalman. 60 How., 491. Robinson vs Nat. Bank of New Berne, 58 How., 306. Lambkin vs Douglas. 10 Abb. N. C, 342; 63 How., 47; 27 Hun, 517. Taylor vs Reid, 54 How., 27. WaUace vs Castle, 68 N. Y., 370. Lyon vs Blakesley, 19 Hun, 399. Rupert vs Haug, 87 N. Y., 141; 62 How., 364; 1 McC. C. P., 411. Stevens vs Middleton, 36 Hun., 470. Trow's Printing, &c., Co. vs Hart, 9 Daly, 413; id., 60 How., 190. Wittner vs VonMinden. 37 Hun, 234. Weiler vs Schreiber, 11 Abb. N. C, 175; 63 How., 491. Pomeroy vs Ricketts, 27 Hun, 243; S. C, 91 N. Y. 668; 15 Week. Dig., 35; 16 id., 327; Pickhardt vs Antony, 37 Hun, 369. Alford vs Cobb, 38 Hun, 32. Cribben vs SchiUinger, 30 Hun, 248. Hirsch vs Hutchinson, 3 Browne C. P 106 Smith vs Davis, 3 Browne C. P.. 75. Dolz vs Atlantic & G. S. Trans. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 162 Golden Gate Con. Co. vs Jackson, 13 Abb. N. C, 476. German Bank of London vs Dash. 60 How., 124. Ellison vs Berstein, 60 How., 145. Murrav vs Hankin, 3 Browne, C. P., 343. Partridge vs Browne, 19 Week. Dig., 434. Smadbeck vs Sisson, 66 How., 220; 4 Browne C. P., 353. Reilly vs Sisson, 4 Browne C. P., 361. Mershon vs Leonard Scott Publishing Co., id., 319. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 59 §637.— Rupert vs Haug, 87 N. Y., 141. Hun. 243; 15 Week. Dig., 25; 16 id., 327. Pomeroy vs Ricketts, 91 N. Y., 668; S. C, 37 §638.— Talor vs Troacoso, 76 N. Y., 599. Mojarrietta vs Saenz, 80 N. Y., 547. Blossom vs Estes, 84 N. Y., 614. Donnell vs Williams, 81 Hun, 316. Bogart vs Sweezey, 36 Hun, 463. Gribbon vs Freel, 93 N. Y., 98; 2 MoC. C. P., 482; 65 How., 373. Pomeroy vs Ricketts, 91 N. Y., 668; S. C, 37 Hun, 342; 16 Week. Dig., 327; 15 Week. Dig., 25. Pickhardt vs Antony. 27 Hun. 269. Betzemann vs Brooks, 31 Hun, 371. Orvis vs Lambeau, 3 McC. C. P., 250. Catlin vs Moss, 2 Browne C. P., 201. Putnam vs Griffin, 19 Week. Dig., 46. ;639. Ct. §640.— Baere vs Armstrong, 26 Hun, 19; 62 How., , 219. Sheldon vs Sabin, 4 Browne C. P., 4. 515. Bate vs McDowell, 48 Super. 641.— Wehle vs Conner, 83 N. Y., 331. Plimpton vs Bigelow, 13 Abb. N. C, 173; Y., 592; 4 McC. C. P., 189. Neely vs McGrandle, 4 Browne C. P., 327. 93 N ;642. §643. 6o CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE 8 644.— 7?i re True, 4 Abb. N. C, 90. Plympton vs Bigelow, 39 Hud, 363; 11 Abb. N, C, 180, S. C; 13 Abb. N. C, 178; 12 Abb. N. C, 302; 3 McC. C. P., 431; id., 131; 93 N. Y., 592; 4 Browne C. P., 189. §645.— Hall vs Brooks, 89 N. Y., 33. §646.— BiUs vs National Park Bank, 47 Super. Ct., 302; 89 N. Y., 343. S647.— Bills vs National Park Bank, 47 Super. Ct., 303; 89 N. Y.. 343. PUmpton vs Bigelow, 93 N. Y., .592; S. C, 12 Abb. N. C, 202; 13 Abb. N. C, 173; 11 Abb. N. C, 180; 3 Browne C. P., 183; 39 Hun, 362; 2 McC. C. P., 431; id.. 131; 63 How., 484; 17 Week. Dig.. 73; 18 Week. Dig., 85; 66 How., 131; 4 Browne C. P., 189. §64§.— Bills vs National Park Bank, 47 Super, Ct.. 303; 89 N. Y., 343. Plympton vs Bigelow, 13 Abb, N. C, 303; 18 Abb. N. C, 173; 2 MoC. C. P., 431; S. C, 93 N. Y., 593. Casper vs Wallace, 5 Browne C. P., 361. § 649.— Amended 1879. Hall vs Brooks, 25 Hun 577. Halben vs Reilly, 9 Daly, 271. Lamont vs Cheshire, 6 Lans , 384; 65 N. Y., 30. Bills vs National Park Bank, 47 Super. Ct., 303; S. C, 89 N. Y., 348. Plimpton vs Bigelow, 93 N. Y., 593; S. C, 11 Abb. N. C, 180; 13 Abb. N. C, 202; 29 Hun, 862; 2 McC. C. P., 431; id., 181; 66 How., 181; 4 Browne C. P., 189. Wehle vs Conner, 69 N. Y. Y., 546; S. C, 83 N. Y., 231. Bates vs Plonsky, 38 Hun, 113; 2 Browne C. P., 389; 3 McC. C. P., 321. Anthony vs Wood, 29 Hun, 239; 19 Week. Dig., 177. In re Flandrow, 92 N. Y., 356. Wilson vs Kelly, 31 Hun, 75. Woolworth vs Taylor, 63 How., 90. Davidson vs Chatham Nat. Bank, 5 Browne C. P.. 167. Gasper vs Wallace, 5 Browne C. P., 361. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 6 1 § 650.— Buckingham vs White, 25 Hun, 441; 1 McC. C. P., 365. HaU vs Brook, 2.', Hun, 577. Almy vs Thurber, 12 Abb. N. C, 459; 3 Browne C. P., 351; 65 How., 481. Anthony vs Wood, 29 Hun, 239; 19 Week. Dig., 177. Smoot vs Heine, 1 McC. C. P., 208. Ess vs Toplanyi, 4 Browne C. P., 173. §651.— Buckingham vs White, 25 Hun, 441; 1 McC. V,. P., 365. Hall vs Brooks, 25 Hun, 577. Almy vs Thurber, 3 Browne C. P., 351; 12 Abb. N. C. 4.59; 65 How., 481. Ess- vs Toplanyi, 4 Browne C. P., 173. § 652.— Campbell vs Conner, 41 Super. Ct., 459. ^653. )654. § 655.— Hall vs Brooks, 25 Hun, 577; S. C, 89 N. Y., 33; 2 Browne C. P., 198. Almy vs Thurbur, 12 Abb. N C, 459; 65 How., 482; 3 Browne C. P., 351. Bowe vs Knicker- bocker Life Ins. Co., 27 Hun, 312. Anthony vs Wood, 29 Hun, 339. Davidson vs Chat- ham Nat. Bank, 32 Hun, 138; 5 Browne 0. P., 167. Bowe vs Arnold, 31 Hun, 256. § 656.— Fisk vs Spring, 35 Hun, 367; 62 How., 510; 1 McC. C. P., 378. § 657.— Halben vs Reilly, 9 Daly, 271. Carpenter vs Lott, 31 Hun, 349. § 658.— Carpenter vs Lott, 31 Hun, 349. §659. §660. §661. 62 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §662. ^663. §664. §663. §666. § 667.— Bowe vs Arnold, 31 Hun, 356. Almy ts Thurber, 65 How., 483; 3 Browne C. P . 351; 12 Abb. N. C, 459. §66§. §669. §670. §671. §672. §673. §674 § 675.— Davidson vs Chatham Nat. Bank, 33 Hun, 138; 5 Browne C. P., 167. §;676. § 677.— Almy vs Thurber, 13 Abb. N. C, 459; 65 How., 483; 3 Browne C. P., 351. Bills vs National Park Bank, 89 N. Y., 343. § 678.-Bms,vs National Park Bank, 89 N. Y., 343. §679. (JUUK OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 63 §680. §681. 481; 78 N. Y., 252; 56 How, Pr., 345; Duseldorf vs Redlich, 16 Hun, 634. ; S. C. , 58 How. , 98 ; id. , 439 ; 59 id. , 402. Trow's Printing, &c., Co. vs Hart, 9 , 340. Tim vs Smith, 93 N. Y., 87; 13 § 682. — Steuben Co. Bank ts Alberger, 55 How. , 75 N. Y., 179. Godfrey vs Godfrey, 75 N. Y., 484. Woodmansee vs Rogers, 83 N. Y. , 88 ; Aff 'g 20 Hvm, 285 ; Jacobs vs Hogan, 85 N. Y., 243; Rev'g 15 Hun, 197. Daly, 413; 60 How., 190; 85 N. Y., 500; 1 McC. C. P , Abb. N. C, 31; 65 How., 358. National Shoe and L. Bank vs Mechanics' National Bank, 89 N. Y., 440. Parsons vs Sprague, 30 Hun, 19: 3 Browne C. P., 291; 65 How., 151; 17 Week. Dig., 361. Murray vs Hankin, 3 Browne C. P., 843. Market Nat. Bank vs Pacific Nat. Bank. 30 Hun, 50. Claflin vs Behr, 57 How , 78. People's Bank of New York vs Mechanics' Nat. Bank of Newark, 63 How., 423. Rupert vs Haug, 1 McC. C. P., 411; 62 How., 364; 87 N. Y., 141. Watts vs Nichols, 19 Week. Dig., 165. Sheldon vs Sabin, 4 Browne C. P., 4. § 683.— Ives vs Holden, 14 Hun, 403. Steuben Co. Bank vs Alberger, 75 N. Y.. 179; 78 N. Y., 353. Godfrey vs Godfrey, 75 N. Y , 434. Jacobs vs Hogan, 85 N. Y., 343; Rev'g 15 Hun, 197. Trow's Printing, &c., Co. vs Hart, 85 N. Y.. 500; AfE'g 9 Daly, 413: 60 How., 190; 1 McC. C. P., 340. Rupert vs Haug, 87 N. Y., 141; 63 How., 864; 1 McC. C. P., 411. Pomeroy vs Ricketts, 37 Hun, 343 S. C. ; 91 N. Y., 668. Parsons vs Sprague, 30 Hun, 19. Kibbe vs Wetmore, 31 Hun, 434. Murray vs Hankin, 8 Browne C. P., 343. Hirsch vs Hutchinson, 3 Browne C. P., 106; 64 How., 366. Tim vs Smith, 3 Browne C. P., 416; id. 347; 65 How., 853; 98 N. Y., 87. Achelis vs Kahnan, 60 How., 491. Coffin vs Stitt, 19 Week. Dig., 22; 5 Browne C. P., 361. Williams vs Waddell, 5 Browne C. P.. 191. § 684.— Repealed 1877. '64 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 685.— Repealed 1877. §686. § 68T.— Trow's Printing, &c., Co. vs Hart, 9 Daly, 413; 85 N. Y., 500; 60 How., 190; 1 McC. C. P., 240. Claflin vs Behr, 57 How., 78. § 688.— Duseldorf vs Redlich, 16 Hun. 624. McCombs vs AUen, 18 Hun, 190. Watte vs Nichols, 19 Week. Dig., 165. § 689.— Gilmore vs Crowell, 67 Barb., 62. Watts vs Nichols, 19 Week. Dig., 165. §690.— Ellsworth vs Scott, 3 Abb. N. 0., 9. §691.— Ellsworth vs Scott, 3 Abb. N. C. 9. ) 692. §693.— Staats vs Bristow, 73 N. Y., 264. )694. §695. §696. § 697 §698. §699.— Repealed 1877. § TOO —Repealed 1877. "iror CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 65 s ro2. ^703. •S 704. S 705. 8 706. S 707.— Plympton vs Bigelow, 11 Abb. N. C, 180; S.C.. 93 N. Y., 593; 66 How.. 131; 4 Browne C. P., 189; 13 Abb. N. C, 173. Robinson vs Nat. Bank of New Berne, 58 How., 806, Putnam vs Griffin, 19 Week. Dig., 46. Place vs Riley, 4 Browne C. P., 393. S 708.- Scott vs Morgan. 94 N. Y., 508; 18 Week. Dig., 413. Wilson vs Kelly, 31 Hun, 75. Woolworth vs Taylor, 62 How., 90; 14 Week. Dig., 314. Place vs Riley, 4 Browne C. P., 393. § 709— Woodruff vs Imperial Life Ins. Co., 90 N. Y., 521. Day vs Beach, 87 N. Y. 56. Ellsworth vs Scott, 3 Abb. N. C, 9. Hall vs U. S. Reflector Co., 66 How., 31; 4 Browne C. P., 148. Bowe vs U. S. Reflector Co., 4 Browne C. P., 154. ^ 710.— Ellsworth vs Scott, 3 Abb N. C, 9. §711. 66 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 713.-Guernsey vs Powers, 9 Hun, 78. Fostervs Townshend, 3 Abb. N. C, 29. King VB King, 41 Super. Ct , 516. Piatt vs Piatt, 66 N. Y. , 360. Adee vs Bigler, 81 N. Y., 349, Mutual Life Ins. Co. vs Spicer, 13 Hun, 117. State Bank vs Gill, 33 Hun, 410. Chamber- lain vs Greenleaf, 4 Abb. N. C, 93. Gallagher vs Karns, 37 Hun, 375. Alford vs Berkele, 39 Hun, 683. Hollenbeok vs Donnell, 94 N. Y., 343; S. C, 39 Hun, 94; 17 Week. Dig., lo. Dusenbury vs Dusenbury, 3 McCarty C. P., 91; 4 Browne C. P., 136. Pratt vs UnderwofKl, 4 Browne C. P., 167. § 714.— Amended 1879. McCarthy vs McCarthy. 13 Hun, 579. Whitney vs Welch, } Abb. N. C, 443. Attrill vs Rockaway Beach Imp. Co., 35 Hun, 509. § 715.— Holmes vs McBowell, 15 Hun, 585. Pratt vs Underwood, 4 Browne C. R, 67. Titus vs Fairchild, 4 Browne C. P., 418; 49 Super. Ct., 311. §716. § 717.— McCarthy vs McCarthy, 18 Hun, 579. §71§. § 719.— Amended 1879. Duncan vs Guest, 3 Browne C. P.', 375; 15 Week. Dig,, 112. Stafford vs Ambs, 8 Abb. N. C, 337. § 79©.- Inserted 1879. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 67 S 731.— Amended 1879. McGowan vs Newman, 4 Abb. N. C, 80. Produce Bank vs Morton, 40 Super. Ct., 328; overruled in part, 67 N. Y., 199. Grant vs Griswold, 21 Hun, 509. KattvsGermaniaFirelns. Co., 26Hun, 439. Christal vs Kelly, 88 N. Y., 385. Piper vs Van Buren, 37 Hun, 384. Weil vs Martin, 1 McC. C. P., 183. Grant vs Birdsall, 3 Browne C. P., 432, Dezemgrel vs Dezemgrel, 24 Hun, 457. § 782.— Holmes vs McDowell, 15 Hun, 585. Sohultz vs Third Ave. R. R. Co.. 89 N. 343. Dezemgrel vs Dezemgrel, 34 Hun, 457. §723.-PhiUips vs Melville, 10 Hun, 311. Shaw vs Cock, 12 Hun, 173. Smith vs Eathbun, 13 Hun, 47. Bailey vs Lee, 14 Hun, 534. Hand vs Burrows, 15 Hun, 481. Tighe vs Pope, 16 Hun, 180. Irwin vs Judd, 30 Hun, 563. Chittenango Cotton Co., vs Stewart, 67 Barb., 433. A. & P. Tel. Co., vs B. & O. R. R. Co., 46 Super. Ct., 380. Havemeyer vs Havemeyer, 1 McC. C. P., 448. Weil vs Martin, 1 McC. C. P., 138. Harris vs Tumbridge, 83 N. Y., 93. South wick vs First National Bank, 84 N. Y., 430. Fitch vs Mayor Sec, of N. Y., 88 N. Y., 500. Bowen vs Widner, 13 Week. Dig., 525. New vs Aland, 63 How., 185. Risley vs Wightman, 13 Hun, 163. Gribbon vs Freel, 93 N. Y., 98; 2 McC. C. P., 483; 65 How., 373. Holmes vs McDowell, 15 Hun, 585. Douglas vs Haberstro, 63 How., 455. Jagger vs Cunningham, 8 Daly. 511. Knapp vs Fowler, i6 Hun, 300; 30 Hun, 513. Robertson vs Robertson, 9 Daly, 44. N. Y. S. Monitor Milk Pan Asso. vs Remington Agricultural Works, 89 N. Y., 33; 35 Hun, 476. McLaohliu vs Brett, 37 Hun, 18; 2 Browne C. P., 194. Kibbe vs Wetmore, 31 Hun, 434. Dezemgrel vs Dezemgrel, 34 Hun, 457. Reck vs Phoenix Ins. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 376. Gillies vs Kreuder, 1 Dem., 349. Chatfleld vs Simonson, 93 N. Y., 309. Lewin vs Wright, 31 Hun, 327. Skoog vs N. Y. Noveltv Co., 4 Browne C. P., 144. Spies vs Roberts. 19 Week. Dig., 505. 68 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 724 — Dinsmore vs Adams, 5 Hun, 149; 66 K Y., 618. In re Buffalo, 78 N. Y., 362. Irwin vs Judd, 20 Hun, 562. Hatch vs Central National Bank, 78 N. Y., 487. Piper vs VanBuren 27 Hun, 384. N. Y. S. Monitor Milk Pan Assp. vs Eemington Agricultural Works 89 N. Y., 22. Lavalle vs SkeUy, 90 N. Y., 546; 16 Week. Dig.,. 41. Eagan vs Moore 3 McC C. P., 336; 2 Browne C. P., 300. Lewis vs Stevens, 93 N. Y., 57; 3 McC. C, P., 450. Bellamy vs Guhl, 62 How., 460. MoLaohlln vs Brett, 2 Browne C. P., 194; 37'Hun, 18. Werbolowsky vs Greenwich Ins. Co., 5 Browne C. P., 303. i725. s726. §727. ;728. § 729.— Irwin vs Judd, 20 Hun, 562. Pember vs Sohaller, 58 How., 511. §730.— Holmes vs McDowell, 15 Hun, 585. Pember vs Schaller, 58 How.. 511. O'SuUivan vs Connors, 33 Hun, 137. ' Irwin vs Judd, 30 Hun, 563. § 731.— Moffatt vs Henderson, 48 Super. Ct., 449. § 732.- Cass vs Higenbotam, 37 Huif, 406. § 733.— Mela vs Geis, 3 Browne C. P., 153. ;734. § 735.— Orr vs McEwen, 16 Hun, 635. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. § 737.— Lintz vs Howard, 18 Hun, 424. S 73§.— Herman vs Lyons, 10 Hun, 111; S. C, 2 Abb. N. C, 90. Beards vs Wheeler. 76 N. Y., 213: 11 Hun, 539. Wallace vs Am. L. T. Co., 16 Hun, 404. Robinson vs Marks. 19 Hun, 325. Moffatt vs Henderson, 48 Super. Ct.. 449. Smith vs Bowers, 3 Browne C. P., 72. Davis vs The Mayor, &c., 4 Browne C. P., 290. 1739. §740.— McFarren vs St. John, 14 Hun, 387. Riggs vs WaydeU, 17 Hun, 515; S. C, 78 N. Y., 586; 56 How., 247. Noonan vs Smith, 12 Abb. N. C. 337. Eagan vs Moore, 2 McC. C. P., 336. Werbolowsky vs Greenwich Ins. Co., 5 Browne C. P., 303. §741.— Repealed 1877. § 742.— Repealed 1877. i743. ; 744.— McFarren vs St. John, 14 Hun, 387. § 745.— Veeder vs Mudgett, 27 Hun, 519. §746. §y47. "§748^ §749. §750. §''51. 70 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §752. §'•53. (754. § 755.— People ex rel. Egan vs Justices Marine Ct. , 81 N. Y. , 500. Holsman vs St. John, 48 N. Y. Super. Ct., 306; 3 McC. C. P., 146; 2 Browne C. P., 48; 90 N. Y., 461. Concord Granite Co. vs French, 3 Browne C. P., 445; id., 56; 65 How., 317. Roberts vsMarson, 11 Week. Dig., 368. Dalton vs Sandland, 4 Browne O. P., 73. S 756.— Cuff vs Borland, 7 Abb. N. C, 194. Underwood vs Sutcliffe, 31 Hun, 357. People ex rel. Egan vs Justices Marine Court, 81 N. Y., 500. Smith vs Zalinski, 94 N. Y., 519. Concord Granite Co. vs French, 3 Browne C. P., 445; id., 56; 65 How., 317. McNa- mara vs Harris, 4 Browne C. P., 76. Estate of Tilden, 5 id., 449. §757. — Amended Laws 1879, ch. 543. Evans vs Cleveland, 18 Hun, 140. People ex rel. Egan vs Justices, &o., 81 N. Y., 500. Green vs Martine, 31 Hun, 136; 1 McC. C. P., 139. Coit vs Campbell, 83 N. Y., 509; 30 Hun, 50. Holsman vs St. John, 90 N. Y., 4fil; 15 Week. Dig., 511. McLachlin, vs Brett, 37 Hun, 18; 3 Browne C. P., 194. Wood vs FlynnJ 30 Hun, 444. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co., vs Pettit, 3 MoC. C. P., 149. Dalton vs Sandlandji 4 Browne C. P., 78. 1 § 758.— Hauok vs Craigliead, 8 Hun, 337; Rev'd. 67 N. Y., 483. Randall vs Sackett, 77 N. Y., 480; 56 How., 885: Richardson vs Draper, 33 Hun, 188. Underwood vs Sutcliffe, 31 Hun, 357. Smith vs Zalinski, 94 N. Y., 519. Smith vs Kibbe, 31 Hun, 390; 19 Week. Dig., 118. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. /I §759.— Smith vs Zalinski, 94 N. Y., 519. § 760.— Amended 1879. Holsman ts St. John, 48 N. Y., Super Ct., 306; 2 McC. C. P., 146; 90 N: Y., 461; 2 Browne C. P., 48. Smith vs Zalinski, 94 N. Y., 519. §761.— Holsman vs St. John. 90 N. Y.. 461. §762. § 763. — Tuomy vs Dunn, 77 N. Y., 515. People ex rel. Eagau vs Justices, &c., 81 N. Y„ 500. Grant vs Griswold. 21 Hun, 509. Adams vs Nellis, 59 How., 385. Fulton vs Fulton, 8 Abb. N. C, 210. § 764.— Amended 1881. Fulton vs Fulton, 8 Abb. N. C, 210. §765.— N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co. vs Pettit, 2 McC. 0. P., 149. Adams vs Nellis, 59 How., 885. Weyh vs Boylan, 62 How., 397. §766.— Famham, Supervisor, Sec, vs Benedict, 29 Hun, 44; 16 Week. Dig., 170. §767.— Uline vs N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co, 79 N. Y.. 175. Meyers vs Becker, 29 Hun, 567. Seaman vs Reicheman, 16 Week. Dig., 561. In re Thorn, 10 Daly, 71. § 768.— Verplanck vs Kendall, 47 Super. Ct., 518. Estate of Stokes, 8 Browne C. P., 384. Boucicault vs Boucicault, 59 How., 181; 21 Hun, 431. In re Thorn, 10 Daly, 71. People vs City Bank of Rochester, 19 Week. Dig., 119; 30 Alb. L. J., 294. 72 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §769.— Amended 1879. Phillips vs Wheeler, 2 Hun, 603; S. C, 16 Abb. N. C m aff'd. 67 N. Y., 104. McCarthy vs McCarthy, 54 How., 97. Sutton vs Sabey, 23 Hun, 557' Hull vs Hart, 37 Hun, 31. Curtis vs Greene, 28 Hun, 294. Hun vs Salter, 92 N. Y., 651 Smith vs Danzig, 3 Browne, C. P., 127. Wheeler vs Millar, 61 How., 396. Erisman n Pidcock, 62How., 327. S770. — Boucicault vs Boucicault. 31 Ilun, 431; 59 How.. 131. Lachenmeyer vs Lachenmeyer, 36 Hun, 542; 65 How., 422. Robertson vs Robertson, 9 Daly, 44. S 771. § 772,— McCarthy vs McCarthy, 13 Hun, 579 ; S. C, 54 How., 97. Levy vs Loeb 5 Abb. N. C, 157. Morehouse vs Yeager, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.), 306. Larkin vs Steele, '35 Hun, 254. Hull vs Hart, 37 Hun, 21. People vs Nat. Trust Co., 31 Hun, 30; 4 Browne C. P., 303. White vs Angell, 3 McC. C. P., 440. Marks vs King 13 Abb. N. C, 374; 66 How., 453. Gunning vs Appleton, 57 How., 510. People ex rel. Nichols vs Cooper 57 How., 463. §773. § 774.— Pool vs Safford, 10 Hun, 497. § 775.— Grant vs Griswold, 31 Hun, 509. Hull vs Hart, 37 Hun, 31. White vs An- gell, 2 McC. C. P., 440. § 776.— Harrison vs Neher, 9 Hun, 128. Knapp vs Po?t, 10 Hun, 35. People ex rd. Nichols vs Cooper, o7 How. , 463. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 73 §777. — Verplanck vs Kendall, 47 Saper. Ct., 513. People vs Globe Mut. Life Ins. Co., 57 How., 481. 1778. § 779.— Amended laws 1882, ch. 397. Amended 1879. Amended 1884, ch. 181, p. 313. Marsh vs Woolsey, 14 Hun, 1. Anonymous, 4 Abb. N. C, 11. Lyons vs Murat, 4 Abb. N. C, 18; 54 How., 83; id., 368. Brown vs Kahn, 17 Hun, 599. Brown vs Griswold, 23 Him, 618. Phipps vs Carman, 26 Hun, 518. Jones vs Easton, 11 Abb. N. C, 114. Hoyt vs Godfrey, 3 Browne C. P., 118. Valiente vs Bryan, 3 Browne C. P., 358: 65 How., 203. Tunstall vs Winton, 31 Hun, 330. Marks vs King, 13 Abb. N. C, 374; 66 How., 453. Lachenmeyer vs Lachenmeyer, 65 How., 423; 36 Hun, 254. In re assignment of Thorn, 10 Daly, 71. Wood vs Holmes, 19 Week. Dig., 131. § 780.— People ex rel. Mayor, &c., vs Nichols, 38 How., 300; 18 Hun, 530; S. C, 79 N. Y., 582. Power vs Athens, 19 Hun, 165. Larkin vs Steele, 85 Hun, 354. People vs N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 3 McC. C. P., 345. People ex rel. Cooper vs Special Term, 57 How., 467. Gross vs Clark, 1 McC. C. P.. 17. In re Han-is. 1 McC. C. P., 163. g 781.— Duche vs Buffalo Grape Sugar Co.. 11 Abb. N. C, 233; 2 McCarty C. P., 114. White vs Angell, 3 McC. C. P., 440. §782. § 783.— Duche vs Buffalo Grape Sugar Co., 11 Abb. N. C 23J; 2 McUarty C. P.. 114. Lavalle vs SkeLy, 90 N. Y., 546; 16 Weekly Dig., 41. Bellamy vs Guhl, 62 How., 460. Thompson vs Heidenrich, 66 How ,391. 74 CODE annotat;ions referring to the § 784.— Lavalle vs Skelly, 90 N. Y.. 546; 16 Weekly Dig., 41. Piper vs Van Buren 27 Hun, 384; 15 Weekly Dig., 213. § 7§5. — Applies to all Courts. Laws 1882, ch. 399. Brown vs Mayor, &c., of N. Y 9 Hun, 587. '' § 786. -Travis vs Meyers, 67 N. Y., 543. Sohuehle vs Reiman, 86 N. Y., 270. § 787.— Market Nat. Bank vs Pacific Nat. Bank, 15 N. Y. Weekly Dig., 34 S C ■ 11 Abb. N. C, 104; 89 N. Y., 397. Marvin vs Marvin, 75 N. Y., 240. § 788.— Marvin vs Marvin, 75 N. Y., 240. Gribbon vs Freel, 98 N. Y., 93; 2 McC. C. P., 483. § 789.— Mayor, &o., vs Broadway, &c., R. R. Co., 13 Hun, 571; 54 How., 833. § 790.— Mayor, &c., vs Broadway, &c., R. R. Co., 13 Hun, 571; 54 How., 823. § 791.— Amended 1882, chap. 897, and 1883, chap. 391, p. 568. Amended 1879, 1888, 1884, chap. 403, p. 483. Stud well vs Charter Oak Ins. Co., 19 Hun, 137. Peyser vs Wendt, 84 N. Y., 642. Bank of Attica vs Met. Nat. Bank, 91 N. Y., 389; 16 Weekly Dig., 80.. Taylor vs Wing, 83 N. Y., 537; 1 MoC. C. P., 48. Bartlett vs Musliner, 93 N. Y., M. People ex rel. Augerstein vs Kinney, 93 N. Y., 647. Phila. Steamship Dock Co. vs Loril- li^ ,^®^'2®'^'P Co. , 54 Ho w. , 508. Robertson vs Schellhaas, 63 How. , 489. City Nat. Bank of Dallas -\^s Nat. Park Bank, 62 How., 495. Reilly vs Byrne, 1 McC. C. P., 301. Mayor, &c. vs Broadway, &c., R. R. Co., 12 Hun 571; 54 How., 333. Angle vs Kaufman, 4 Browne C. P., 301. Smith vs Keepers, 66 How., 474; 5 Browne C. P., 66. I CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 75 § 792.— Mayor, &c., vs Broadway, &c., R. R. Co , 13 Hun, 571; 54 How., 333. § 79S.— Amended 1879. Bank of Attica vs Met. Nat. Bank. 91 N. Y., 339; 16 Weekly Dig. , 80. Bartlett vs Musliner, 93 N. Y. , 646. People ex rel. Augerstein vs Kinney, 98 N. Y., 647. Robertson vs Schellhaas, 63 How., 489. City Nat. Bank vs Nat. Park Bank, 63 How., 495. Mayor, &c., vs Broadway, &c., R. R. Co., 13 Hun, 571; 54 How., 333. Angle vs Kaufman, 4 Browne C. P., 301. Smith vs Keepers, 66 How., 474: 5 Browne C. P., 66. § 794.- —Mayor, &c., , vs Broadway, &o., R. R. Co., 13 Hun, 571; S. C; , 54 How., , 333. § 795. -Mayor, &c., , vs Broadway, &c.. , R. R. Co.-, , 13 Hun, 571: 54 How,. 333. §796. § 797.— Amended 1879. Gaffney vs Bigelow, 3 Abb. N. C, 311. Asinari vs Volken- ing, 3 Abb, N. C. 454. Gross vs Clark, 1 McC. C. P., 17: id., 464; 87 N. Y., 373. Marcele vs Saltzman, 66 How., 305. § 79§.— Marks vs King, 13 Abb N, C, 3T4; 66 How., 453. Green vs Warren, 14 Hun, 434. Marcele vs Saltzman, 66 How. , 3 '5. § 799.-Rossner vs N. Y, Museum, 30 llun, 183, §§00. §80I. §802. 76 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE i 803 — Mott vs Consumers' loe Co., 2 Abb. N. C, 143. Martin vs Spofford, 3 Abb. N. C 125 Walmsley vs Nelson, 2 Abb. N. C, 127. Cutter vs Pool, id. 130; S. C, 54 How,, 311 Adriance vs Sanders, 11 Abb. N C, 423: 2 McC. C. P., 363. Boorman vs A. & P. R, R Co 78 N Y., •')99. Stillwell vs Priest, 85 N. Y., 649. Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf., 586. Andrews vs Townshend, 48 N. ¥. Super. Ct., 163. Shoe and Leather Assoc, vs Bailey, 49 Super Ct , 385. Amsinck vs North, 63 How., 115; S. C, 1 McC. C. P., 180 (note). Babbilt vs Crampton, 1 McC. C. P., 169. Black vs Curry, 1 McC. C. P., 193. Martine vs Albro, 2 Browne C P 70. Anderson vs Townshend, 3 Browne C. P , 76. Mehesy vs Kahn, 19 Week. Dig., 339. Rafferty vs Williams, 19. Week. Dig., 341. Dickie vs Austin, 4 Browne C. P., 133. g 804.— See § 803. Livingston vs Curtis, 13 Hun, 131. Stillwell vs Priest, 85 N. Y,, 649. ' Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf., 586. Babbitt vs Crampton, 1 McC. C. P., 169. § 805,— Stillwell vs Priest, 85 N. Y., 649. Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf., 586. Babbitt vs Crampton, 1 McC. C. P., 169. § 806.— Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf., 586. Shoe and Leather Assoc, vs Bailey, 49 Super. Ct., 385. § 807.— Dale vs Stokes. 5 Redf., 586. Shoe and Leather Assoc, vs Bailey, 49 Super. Ct., 385. §808. -Martin vs Spofiford 3 Abb. N. C, 135. Walmsley vs Nelson, 2 Abb. N. C, 127. Cutter vs Pool, 2 Abb. N. C, 130; S. C, 54 How., 311. Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf., 586. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. TJ §8»9.— Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf . , 586. S 810.— BlLss vs Molter, 58 How., 113; 8 Abb. N. C, 341. §811— Morss vs Hasbrouck, 10 Abb. N. C, 410; 3 McC. C. P., 84; 63 How., 84. Delamater vs Byrne, 57 How., 170. §812.- Code C. P., §1335, as amended 1883, ch. 397. Irwin vs Judd, 30 Hun, 563. Trask vs Aunett, 1 Dem., 171. Thompson vs Friedberg, 54 How., 519. Bliss vs Molter, .58 How., 118; 8 Abb. N. C, 341. Delamater vs Byrne, 59 How., 71. Jones vs Piatt, 60 How., 73. Nathans vs Hope, 5 Browne C. P., 401. Fullan vs Hooper, 66 How., 75. §813.— Trask vs Aunett. 1 Dem., 171. § 814 —Titus vs Fairchild, 49 Super. Ct.. 311: 4 Browne C. P , 418. §815.- ManningvsGould, 47 Super. Ct., 387; 1 McC. C. P.. 316. §816. § 817.— Mayor vs Mayor, 11 Abb. N. C, 367; 3 McC. C. P . 171; 64 How , 330. Mayor vs Coffin, 90 N. Y., 313. Soloraan vs Belden, 13 Abb. N. C. 58. Campbell &c., M'f'g. Co. vs Lyddy, 1 McC. C. P., 364. Woodward vs Frost, 19 Week. Dig.. 135. 1; Kt|8 — Soloman vs Belden, 13 Abb. N. C,, 58. S 819.— McKay vs Reed, 12 Abb. N. C, 58 (nets). 78 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 820.— Webster vs Bond, 9 Hun, 437. B. & O. R. E. Co. vs Arthur, 90 N. Y., 384' 15 Week. Dig., 374. Barnes vs Mavor, &c., of N. Y., 37 Hun, 336. Pustet vs FlanneUv, 60 How., 67. iS21. § 822.— Ellsworth vs Brown, 16 Hun, 1. Gross vs Clark, 87 N. Y., 373; 1 McC. C P 464, id., 17. James vs Shea, 28 Hun, 74; 3 Browne C. P., 358. § 82S.— Carroll vs DeiniLl, 95 N. Y., 353. S 824.— Morehouse vs Yeager, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.), 306. Edleson vs Durvee 10 Week. Dig., 364. ' § 825.— People ex rel. Nichols vs Cooper, 57 How., 463. Foster vs Twiss 18 Week ' Dig., 568. Fiske vs Twigg, 5 Browne 0. P., 41. §826. § 827.— /n re Guardian Savings Inst., 9 Hun, 267. In re Booth, 11 Abb. N. C, 145. , ■ S 828.— People vs Crandon, 17 Hun, 490. Finn vs Finn, 13 id., 339. Hill vs Hotch- S'®?J ^L?""^-,^^^' 5* ?-e Frazer, 92 N. Y., 339. Sherman vs Scott, 37 Hun, 381; 3 Browne O. P., 36b. In re Hutchmson, 19 Week. Dig., 368. Greismann vs Dreyfus, 4 Browne C. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 79 § §29.— Amended 1881. Titus vs O'Connor, 18 Hun, 373; 57 How., 391. Head vs Teeter, 10 Hun, 548. Tilton vs Ormsby, id., 7. Somerville vs Crook, 9 id., 664. Bragne vs Lord, 2 Abb. N. C, 1. Ross vs Harden, 42 Super. Ct. (J. & Sp.), 427. Freeman vs Lawrence, 43 id., 288. Card vs Duryea, 66 N. Y., 651. Richardson vs Warner, 13 Hun, 13. Clark vs Bmce, 12 id., 274. Theall vs Steitz, 6 Daly, 482. Chadwick vs Founer, 69 N. Y., 404 : rev'g 6 Hun, 543. AUis vs Stafford, 14 Hun. 418. Houghey vs Wright, 12 Hun, 179. Waver vs Waver, 15 Hun, 277. Nearpass vs Gilman, 16 id., 121. Graves vs King, 15 Hun, 367. Ely vs Clute, 19 id., 35. Hill vs Alvord, id., 77. Fisher vs Verplanck, 17 Hun, 150. Severn vs Nat. State Bank, 18 id., 238. Church vs Howard, 79 N. Y., 415. Holcomb vs Holcomb, 20 Hun, 156; 95 N. Y., 316. Schoonmaker vs Wolford, id., 166. Moyer vs Moyer, 21 id., 67. Hammond vs Schultze, 45 Super. Ct. (J. & S.), 611. Hall vs Richardson, 22 Hun, 444. Pratt vs Elkins, 80 N. Y., 198. CarroU vs Davis, 9 Abb. N. C, 60. Potts vs Mayer, 10 Abb. N. C, 63; 86 N. Y., 302. Hill vs Hotchkiss, 23 Hun, 414. Wilkins vs Baker, 24 Hun, 82. Stevens vs Brennan, 79 N. Y., 254. Whitehead vs Smith, 81 N. Y., 151. PlatnervsPlatner, 78N. Y., 90. Foote vs Beeoher, 78 N. Y, 155. Gorham vs Price, 25 Hun, 11. Hunter vs Herrick, 26 Hun, 272. Wadsworth vs Heermans, 85 N. Y., 630. MiUer vs Montgomery, 78 N. Y., 282. Smith vs Ulman, 26 Hun, 386. Hadsall vs Scott, 26 Hun, 617. Ham vs Van Orden, 84 N. Y., 257. In re probate wiU of Smith, 19 Week. Dig., 220; 95 N. Y., 517. Church vs Howard, 17 Hun, 5. Ward vs Plato, 23 Hun, 402. Hoar vs Hoar, 23 Hun, 33. Pursell vs Fry, 19 Hun, 595. Witthaus vs Schack, 24 Hun, 328. Rice vs Motley, 24 Hun, 143. Kale vs EUiott, 18 Hun. 198. Smith vs Hathorn, 25 Hun, 159. Marsh vs Brown, 18 Hun, 319. Benjamin vs Dimick, 4 Redf., 7. Pinney vs Orth, 88 N. Y., 447: 2 Browne C. P., 1. Badger vs Badger, 88 N. Y., 546. Carpenter vs Soule, 88 N. Y., 251. Burnett vs Noble, 5 Redf.. 69. In re Burke, 5 Redf., 369. National Exch. Bank vs Jones, 9 Daly, 248. Robbins vs Pultzs, 48 N. Y,, Super. Ct , 510. Pope vs Allen, 90 N. Y., 298. In re application of N. Y. C. & H. R R. Co., 90 N. Y, 342. Smith vs Cross, 90 N. Y. , 549. Maverick vs Marvel, 90 N. Y. , 656. Trimmer vs Trimmer, 90 N. Y., 675. Koehler vs Adler, 91 N. Y.. 657 Sherman vs Scott, 27 Hun, 331; 2 Browne C. P., 366. Sprague vs Swift, 28 Hun, 49;, 3 Browne C. P.. 34. Sweet vs Low, 28 Hun, 432. Corning vs Walker, 28 Hun, 435. Cannon vs North Western Mut Life Ins. Co., 29 Hun, 470. Brown vs Brown, 29 Hun, 498. Lathrop vs Hopkins, 29 Hun, 608. Steele vs Ward, 30 Hun, 555. Pease vs Baruett, 30 Hun, 525. Maodonald vs Woodbury, 30 Hun, 35; 3 Browne C. P., 337; 65 How , 226. Wilson vs Reynolds, 31 Hun, 46. Converse vs Cook, 31 Hun, 417. Barton vs Scramling, 31 Hun, 467. Stephens vs Cornell, 31 Hun, 414; 19 Week. Dig., 306. In re Frazer, 92 N. Y., 239 Sanford vs EUithorp, 95 N. Y.. 48. Lane vs Lane, 95 N. Y., 494. Bristol vs Sears, 3 Browne C. P., 329. Scherrer vs Kauf- man, 1 Dem., 39. Whelpley vs Loder, 1 Dem., 368. Mutual Life Ins, Co. vs Holloday, 13 Abb N. C, 16. Markell vs Benson, 55 How., 361). Pettit vs Geesler, 58 How., 195. Sacla vs Decker, 1 McC. C. P., 47; 10 Daly, 204. Taylor vs Meldrum, Sheriff, Sec, 19 Week. Dig., 25. Wood vs Holmes, 19 Week. Dig., 121. Price vs Price, 19 Week. Dig., 331. KeUey vs Burroughs, 19 Week. Dig., 478. 8o CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE S§29. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 8 1 I" Y.,I5 j 830.— Amended 1879 Waver vs Waver, 15 Hun, 277. Whitehead vs Smith, 81 N. 151 Potts vs Mayer, 46 Super. Ct., 183; rev'd, 10 4bb. N. C, 63. Bradley vs Mirick. 91 N. Y.. 293; 16 Week. Dig.. 200; 25 Hun, 272. Lawson vs Jones, 61 How., 424; 1 McC. C. P., 247. §831.— Amended 1879 and 1880, ch. 149, p. 274. Hennessey vs Hennessey, 58 How.. .304. Farace vs Farace, 1 MoC. C. P., 419. g 832.— Amended 1879, ch. .542, 43 Super. Ct., J. & S., 100; 2 E. S., 701; ^ 23 repealed by ^882. Sims vs Sims, 75 N. Y., 466. Perry vs People, 86 N. Y., 853; 62 How., 148. People vs McGloin, 28 Hun, 150; 91 N. Y., 341; 16 Week. Dig., 255; 12 Abb. N. C, 172. People vs Scheive, 29 Hun, 122. People vs Hovey, 29 Hun, 383. Sacia vs Decker, 1 McC. C. P., 47; 10 Daly, 204. §833. g 834.— Pierson vs People, 18 Hun, 339; aff'd 79 N. Y.. 424. Edmgton vs Mutual Life Ins. Co., 5 Hun, 1; rev'd 67 N. Y., 185. Edington vs ^tna Life Ins. Co. 13 Hun, 543. Grattan vs Nat. Life Ins. Co., 15 id., 74. Staunton vs Parker, 19 id., 55. Mott vs Consumers' Ice Co., 2 Abb. N. C. 143. Grattan vs Matropolitan Life Ins. Co., 80 N. Y., 281; S. C, 24 Hun, 43; 28 Hun, 430; 16 Week. Dig., 50; 17 id., 194; 92 N. Y., 274. Pearsall vs Elmer, 5 Redf., 181. Roberts vs O. & L. C. R. R. Co.. 39 Hun, 154. Steele vs Ward. 30 Hun, 55.5. Whelpley vs Loder. 1 Dem., 868. § 835.— Kootvs Wright, 21 Hun, 34-t: aff'd 84 N. Y , 72. Pearsall vs Elmer, 5 Redf., 181. Whelpley vs Loder, 1 Dem., 368. Slierman vs Scott, 2 Browne C. P., 366: 27 Hun. 331. CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE ^5 836.- Mason vs Libbey, 2 Abb., N. C. 137. Grattan vs Nat. Life Ins. Co., 15 Hun, 74. Staunton vs Parker, 19 id., 55. Pearsall vs Elmer, 5 Redf ., 181. §837.— Cohen vs Continental Life Ins. Co., 41 Super. Ct. J. & S,, 397. Yamato Trading Co. vs Brown, 27 Hun, 248; 2 McC. C. P., 6; 63 Ho vt-., 283 Canada Steamboat Co. vs Sinclair, 3 Browne C. P., 284. Corbett vs DeComeau, 5 Abb. N. C, 169. Greensward vs Union Dime Savings Inst., 59 How., 399. Walker vs Dunlevy, 4 Browne C. P., 38. §838.— Crouse vs Fi-othingham, 27 Hun, 123. §839. §§40. §841. § 842. § 843. §844.— Williams vs Waddell, 5 Browne C. P., 191. Harris vs Durkee, 5 Browne C. P., 376. i845. §846. TS477 §848. §849. § 850. §851. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 83 g 852.— Riddle vs Cram, 3 Abb. N. C, 117, note. §853.— Riddle vs Cram, 3 Abb. N, C, 117, note. McGuffin vs Dinsmore, 4 Abb. N. C, 241. Carrington vs Hutson, 28 Hun, 371: 16 Week. Dig., 12. §854. g 855 .—Amended 1879. § 856.— Amended 1879. i857. S858. ^859. §860.— Person vs Grier, 66 N. Y., 124. i861. §862. §863. §864. § 865. §866. S 867.- — Amended 1879. In re accounting of Kelly, 11 Weekly Dig., 308. § 868.- —Central Cross Town R. R. Co. vs Twenty-Third Street R. R. Co., 53 How., 4-5. §869. 84 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § §70.— Amended 1879. Hynes vs MoDermott, 55 How., 259; 7 Daly, 513. Mayorrs Noll, 56 How., 214. Euss vs Campbell, 1 McC. C. P., 41. Tenney vs Mautner, 1 IfcC. C P.. 64. Black vs Curry, 1 McC. C. P., 193. Williams vs W. U. Tel. Co., 1 McC. C. p' 294; id. 84 (note). O'Reilly vs W. U. Tel. Co., 13 Hun, 134. Phoenix vs Dupuy, 2 Abb. n' C, 146. Brandon M'f'g Co. vs Pettengill, id. 163. Beach vs Mayor, &c., 14 Hun, 79; 4 Abb. N. C, 336. Greer vs Allen, 15 Hun, 432. Chapin vs Thompson. 16 Hun, 53. Boor- man vs A. & P. R. R. Co., 17 Hun, 555; S. C. 78 N. Y., 599. Parsons vs Belden, 9 Abb. N C.,54. Brisbane vs Brisbane. 30 Hun, 48. Seeley vs Clark, 78 N. Y., 330. Berdellvg Berdell, 86 N. Y., 519; 2 Browne C. P., 159. Town of Hancock vs First Nat. Bank, 93 N. Y., 82. McGuffin vs Dinsmore, 4 Abb. N. C, 341. Montague vs Worstell, 4 Abb. N. C 348 (note). Corbett vs DeComeau, 54 How., 506: 5 id , 169; S. C. 44 Super. Ct., 306; 5 Abb' N. C, 169. In re Paulmier, 5 Abb. N. C, 157; 56 How., 1. Levy vs Loeb. id. 157; S. C 44 Super. Ct., 291. Dunham vs Mercantile Mut. Ins. Co., 44 Super. Ct , 387; S. C. 6 Abb, N. C, 70. People vs Mutual Gas Light Co , 14 Hun, 157; S. C. 74 N..Y., 434; 54 How , 386 Tebo vs Baker, 16 Hun, 183; S. C. 77 N. Y., 33. Sharp vs Hutchinson, 48 Super. Ct.. lOl' 14 Weekly Dig., 87. Roberts vs O. & L. 0. R. R Co., 29 Hun, 154. Almv vs Thurber, 12 Abb. N. C, 462. Wayne Co. Sav'g B'k vs Brackett, 18 Weekly Dig., 530; 31 Hun, 434. Duncan vs Jones, 32 Hun, 12. Yamato Trading Co vs Brown, 2 McCarty C. P., 6; 37 Hun, 248. Hutchinson vs Lawrence, 3 Browne C. P , 99. Canada Steamship Co, vs Sinclair, 3 Browne C. P., 284. Murphy vs N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 31 Hun, 358. New- rath vs Schmitz, 3 Browne C. P.. 400. Brandon M'f'g Co. vs Bridgman, 14 Huin, 122. Ludewig vs Pariser, 54 How., 498. Cook vs Lalance Grosjean M'f'g Co., 3 Browne C. P., 333. De Leon vs De Lima, 66 How., 287. Fogg vs Fisk, 66 How.. 343; 4 Browne C. P., 344 Andrews vs Keene, 4 Browne C. P., 330. Funk vs Tribune Association, 4 Browns C. P., 408. Griesmann vs Dreyfus, 4 Browne C. P., 32 Walker vs Dunlevy, 4 Browne C. P., 38. Briggs vs Taylor. 4 Browne C. P., 338. Goldberg vs Roberts, 5 Browne C. P., 96. Wallace vs Wallace, 19 Week. Dig., 495. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 85 § 871.— /h re Bryan, 3 Abb. N. C, 389. Russ vs Campbell, 1 McC. C. P., 41. Tenney rs Mantuer, 1 McC. C. P., 64. ^ 872.— Amended 1879 aud 1880, chap. 536, p. lHo. Freiberg vs Branigan, 3 Abb, N. C, 121. Wetmore vs Hegeman, id., 133, Martin vs Spofford, id., 125. Webster vs Stock- well, 3 Abb. N. C, 116. In re Bryan, 8 Abb. N. C, 289. Riddle vs Cram, id , 117 (note;. Robertson vs Russell, 20 Hun, 343. Burnett vs Snyder, 41 Super. Ct., J. & S , 343. fclynes vs McDermott, 7 Daly, 513; 55 How., 259 Preston vs Hencken, 9 Abb. N. C, 68. Boor- man vs Pierce, 56 How., 351. Corbott vs De Comeau, 5 Abb. N. C , 169; 54 How , 506; 5 Abb N. C, 252. Town of Hancock vs First Nat. Bank, 93 N. Y., 83. Crooke vs Corbin, 23 Hun, 176. Kinney vs Roberts, 26 Hun, 166. Hutchinson vs Lawi-ence, 29 Hun, 450; 17 Week. Dig., 186. Fourth Nat. Bank vs Boynton, 39 Hun, 441; 17 Week. Dig., 23. Beach vs Mayor, &c., 4 Abb. N. C, 236. Ludewig vs Pariser, id., 346; .o4 How,, 498. Simonds vs Hudson, 4 Abb. N. C. , 347 (note). Montague vs Worstell, id , 248 mote). Shepard vs Conrad, id., 254. Dunham vs Mercantile Mut. Ins. Co., 6 id, 70: S C, 44 Super. Ct., 387; -56 How., 340. Heishon vs Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co., 45 Super Ct., 34; rev'd 77 N Y., 278. Le Roy vs Mathewson, 47 Super. Ct., 389. Dart vs Laimbeer, id., 490. Williams vs W. U Tel. Co., id., 380. Gilbert vs Third Ave R. R. Co., 49 id., 129. Reichman vs Manhattan Co., 26 Hun, 433. Berdell vs Berdell, 86 N. Y., 519. Knowlton vs Bannigan, 11 Abb. N. C, 419; 3 McC. C. P., 317. Fogg vs Fisk, 30 Hun, 61; 66 How,, 343; 4 Browne C. P., 344. Hardy vs Peters, 30 Hun, 79. Wayne Co. Sav'g B'k vs Brackett, 31 Hun, 434; 18 Weekly Dig., 530. Beebe vs Richardson, 3 McC. C. P., 319. In re Ketchum's Application, 60 How., 154. Russ vs Campbell, 1 McC. C. P., 40. Tenney vs Mautner, 1 McC. C. P., 64. Wil- liams vs W. U. Tel. Co., 1 McC. C. P., 294: id. (note) 84. In re MoitIs & Matthews, 19 Week. Dig., 375. Van Ray vs Harriott, 66 How.. 269. Briggs vs Taylor, 4 Browne C. P., 338. Lathrop vs Brown, 5 Browne C. P., 101. 86 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § §73.— Amended 1879 and 1884, ch. 399, p. 481. Chapin vs Thompson, 16 Hun, 53. Elmore vs Hyde, 2 Abb. N. C, 129. Byrne vs Mulligan, 41 Super. Ct., J. & S., 515. Mayer vs Noll, 56 HovF., 214. Harold vs N. Y. El. R. R. Co., 21 Hun, 268. Heishon vs Knicker- bocker Life Ins. Co., 77 N. Y.. 278. Tebo vs Baker. 16 Hun, 182; S. C. 77 N. Y., 33. Ber- dell vs Berdell, 86 N. Y., 519. Corbett vs Gibson, 16 Hun, 341. Borthwick vs Howe, n Hun, 505. Webster vs Stockwell, 3 Abb. N. C, 116. Brandon M'f'g Co. vs PettingiU,a Abb. N. C, 162. Hynes vs McDermott, 7 Daly, 513; 55 How., 259. Hickey vs O'Connor, 45 Super. Ct., 614. Kirkland vs Moss, 11 Abb. N. C, 421. Andrews vs Prince, 31 Hun, 333. Levy vs Loeb, 5 Abb. N. C, 157. Corbett vs DeComeau, 5 Abb. N. C, 169; 54 How,, 506. The People vs Mut. Gas Light Co., 54 How., 386. Ludewig vs Pariser, 4 Abb. N, C, 169; 54 How., 498. Miller vs Kent, 59 How., 321. Fitz Patrick vs Van Schaiok, 5J How., 473. Russ vs Campbell, 1 McC. C. P., 41. Tenney vs Mautner, 1 MoC. C. P.. 64. Lathrop vs Brown, 5 Browne C. P., 101. Andrews vs Prince, 31 Hun, 233. S 874. -Laws 1882, chap. 397. Hesse vs Briggs, 45 N. Y., Super. Ct., J. & S., 431. Brisbane vs Brisbane, 30 Hun, 48. 8 §75.— Amended 1879. Park vs Proal, 54 How., 93. Greer vs Allen, 15 Hun, 433. Chapin vs Thompson, 16 Hun, 53. Harold vs N. Y. El. R. R. Co., 21 Hun, 268. Levy vs. Loeb, 5 Abb. N. C, 157. Brandon M'f'g Co. vs Bridgeman, 14 Hun, 132. Beaoli vs Mayor, &c., 14 Hun, 79; 4 Abb. N. C, 236. People vs Mutual Gas Light Co., 74 N. Y., 434. Tebo vs Baker, 16 Hun, 182; S. C. 77 N. Y., 33. Webster vs Stockwell, 3 Abb. N. C, 116. Jji re Bryan, 3 Abb. N. C, 289. Ridjdle vs Cram, id., 117 (note). Freiberg vs Bran- igan, id., 121. Wetmore vs Hegeman, id.j 123. Martin vs SpofEord, id., 125. Shai-pvs. Hutchinson, 48 N. Y., Super. Ct.. 101. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 87 § 876.— Amended 1879. Harrold vs N. Y. El. R. R. Co., 21 Hun, 268. Hesse vs Briggs, 45 Super Ct., J. & S., 417. . § 877.— Repealed 1877. Inserted by-laws 1883, oh. 397. Van Rov vs Harriott, 30 Hun, 77. § 878.— Repealed 1877. § 879.— Laws 1883, oh. 397. § 880.— Amended 1879. Foster vs Bullock, 12 Hun, 200. Hewlett vs Wood, 67 N. Y., 394, 399. Yamato Trading Co vs Brown, 27 Hun, 248; 2 McCarty C. P., 6; 63 How,, 3S3. Roberts vs O. &L C. R. E. Co., 29 Hun, 134. Canada Steamship Co. vs Sinclair, 3 Browne C. P, 284. Ludewig vs Pariser, 54 How., 498. Corbett vs DeComeau, 54 How., 506; 5 Abb. N. C, 169. Mayer vs EhrUch, 19 Week. Dig., 376. Andrews vs Prinoe, 66 How., 280. Walker vs Dunlevy, 4Browne C. P., 88. Greismann vs Dreyfus, id., 33. Funk vs Tribune Ass'n, id., 408. §881.— Hewlett vs Wood, 67 N. Y., 394, BerdeU vs Berdell, 2 McCarty C. P., 11. McDonald vs Woodbury, 3 Browne C. P., 337; 30 Hun, 35 Murphy vs N. Y. C. & H, R. R, Co., 81 Hun, 358. Fogg vs Fisk, 4 Browne C. P., 344; 66 How., 343. § 882.— Laws 1882, oh. 397. Town of Hancock vs First National Bank, 93 N, Y.. Elverson vs Vanderpool, 41 Super. Ct., 357. Berdell vs Berdell, 3 McCarty, C P.. 11. § 883.— Rice vs Motley, 24 Hun, 143. Fogg vs Fisk, 4 Browne C. P., 344; 66 How., 343. CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §§§4. § 885.— Mason vs Libbey, 3 Abb. N. C , 137. Burnett vs Snyder, 41 Super. Ct. (J. & S.) 343. Bennett vs Edwards, 37 Hun, 353. Williams vs W. U. Tel. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 448. Attorney General vs Continental L. Ins. Co., 4 Browne C. P.. 314: 66 How., .51. §886.— Marsh vs Woolsey, 14 Hun, 1. Gustaf vs Am. Steamship Co., 31 Hun, 95; 4 Browne C. P., 343. Dunham vs Mercantile Mut Ins. Co., o6 How.. 340; 6 Abb. N.C, 70: 44 Super. Ct., 387. Chapter ix., Title iii.. Article ii. — In re Attorney, «3 N. Y.. 164. Champlin vs Stoddart, 64 How., 378. §887. — Amended t«7y, O'Brien vs Commercial Fire Ins. Co., 41 Super. Ct. (J. &S.) 334. Clark vs Candee, 39 Hun, 139. Dunham vs Mercantile Mut. Ins. Co., 56 How.. 24()- 6 Abb. N. C, 70; 44 Super. Ct., 387. Champlin vs Stoddart, 64 How., 378. Estate of Yoorhis, 5 Browne C. P., 444. § 8S8.— Clarlc vs Candee, 39 llun, 139. Champlin vs Stoddart, 64 How., 378. S 889.— Mason & Hamlin Organ Co. vs Pugsley, 19 Hun, 383. Clark vs Candee. Oil Hun, 139 Estate of Vobrhis. ■') Browne C. P.. 444. g 890.— Mason & Hamlin Organ Co. vs Pugsley, 19 Hun, 383 §891.— Uline vs N, Y. C. & H. R. R. Co. 79 N, Y . i;.-i: 9 \Vp,.k. Di- . 344 §892.— Uline vs N. Y. C. & H. K. R. Vo.. 79 N. Y . l]ry. 9 Week. Dig , 341. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 89 S S93.— Jemison vs Citizens Bank, 85 N. Y., 546; S. C, 34 Hun, 350. § 894. -Jemison vs Citizens Bank, 85 N. Y., 546; S. C, 24 iiun, 350. Jones vs Hoyt, 48 N. Y., Super. Ct , 118; 10 Abb. N. C, 834; 14 Week. Dig., 113; 63 Hovr., 94. S S9.5. Amended 1879. Sfe96. g 897.— O'Brien vs Commercial Fire Ins. Co.. 41 Super. Ct . 324. g 898. S899. ;900.-Hevrlett vs Wood, 67 N. Y., 394, 399. § 901 .—O'Brien vs Commercial Fire Ins. Co., 41 Super. Ct., 324. Kelly vs Weber, 9 Abb. N. C, 62. §902. §903. §904. § 903. §906. §908. ^909. 90 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §910.— Hewlett vs Wood, 67 N. Y., 394. Butler vs Flanders, 44 Super. Ct., .531; 86 How., 312. Palmer vs Great Western Ins. Co., 47 Super. Ct., 455. Denny vs Horton, 3 Browne C, P , 255. §911.— Marshall vs Watertown Steam Engine Co., 10 Hun, 4d3. Uline vs N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co., 79 N. Y., 175; 9 Week. Dig., 344. Denny vs Horton, 3 Browne C. P., 335. »912. §913 §914.- -Perry vs People, 86 N. Y., , 353; S. C, 62 How., 148. §915.- -Perry vs People, 86 N. Y., , 353; 62 How., 148. §916. -Perry vs People, 86 N. Y., 353; 62 How., 148. §917. -Perry vs People, 86 N. Y. , , 353; 63 How., 148. §918.- -Perry vs People, 86 N. Y. , 353; 62 How., 148. §919. -Perry vs People, 86 N. Y. , 353; 63 How., 148. §920.- -Perry vs People, 86 N. Y. , 353; 63 How., 148. §921.— Fisher vs Mayor, &c., 3 Hun, 648; 6 Hun, 64; rev'd 67 N. Y. 73. Briggs? Waldron, 83 N. Y., 582. i922. §923.— Kellam vs McKoon, 31 Hun, 519; 18 Week Dig., 443. §924. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 9 1 S925. .£926. g 927.— Madison TJDiversity vs White, 25 Hun, 490. § 92§.— Amended lb79. Roche vs Marvin, 17 Week. Dig., .53. §929.— Derham vs Lee, 60 How., 334; 47 Super. Ct., 174; S. C, 87 N. Y., 599. §930.— Derham vs Lee, 6(i How., 334; 47 Super. Ct.. 174; S. C, 87 N. Y., 599. §931.— Derham vs Lee, 60 How., 334; 47 Super. Ct., 174: S. C. 87 N. Y., 599. §932. S 933.— Amended 1879. Swift vs State of New York, 36 Hun. .508. Fadner vs The Peoplf, 19 Week. Dig., 433. §934. § 935.— Hall vs VanVranken, 28 Hun, 403. Putnam vs Stewart, 2 Browne C. P., 172. §936. §937. §93§. §939. §940. § 941.— Porter vs Waring, 3 Abb. N. C, 231. Uline vs N. Y. C. & H. R. R. E. Co. , 79 N. Y.. 175; 9 Week. Dig., 344. 92 CODE A\N(_)TATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 942.— Hynes vs McDermott, 7 Abb..N. C, 98. Kipp vs McLean, 2 McC. C. P., § 943. § 944.— Amended 1879. §945. §946. §947. §94§. §949. j;950. §951. g 952. — Brown vs Landon, 30 Hun, 57. §954. §953. $954. § 955.— Repealed 1877. § 956.— People vs D'Argencour, 95 N. Y., 624. § 957.— People vs D'Argencour, 95 N. Y. , 624. § 95§.— People vs D'Argencour, 95 N. Y., 624. §959. §960. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. §961. §962.— Hynes vs McDermott, 82 N. Y., 41. S 963.— Goldschmidt vs Goldschmidt, 47 Super. Ct., 184. People e.r rel. Mayor vs Nichols, 18 Hun, .530 ; 79 N. Y.. .588. § 964.— Goldschmidt vs Goldschmidt, 47 Super. Ct., 184. Rutty vs Person, 12 Abb- N. C, 352. People ex rel. Cooper vs Special Term, 57 How., 467. People ex rel. Mayor vs Nichols, 18 Hun, .530 ; 79 N. Y., .582. § 965.— Amended 1879. McGowan vs Newman, 4 Abb. N. C, 80 ; 54 How., 45S. Horton vs Shepard, 1 McC. C. P., 26. §966. § 967.— Butler vs Flanders, 56 How., 312: 44 Super. Ct., 531. § 968.— Ranney vs Warre'n, 17 Hun, 111. Wheelock vs Lee, 5 Abb. N. C, 75; 74 N. Y., 495. Streat vs Rothschild, 12 Abb. N. C. 388. People vs Met. T. & T. Co., 31 Hun. 596. Jones vs Emery, 1 McC. C. P., 338. Cornell vs Cornell, 19 Week. Dig., 184. § 969.— Ranney vs Warren, 17 Hun, 111. Streat vs Rothschild, 12 Abb. N. C, 388. § 970.— Morrell vs Morrell, 17 Hun, 324. Streat vs Rothschild, 12 Abb. N. C. , 388. Lorillard vs Clyde, 3 Browne C. P., 307. §971.- Seymour vs McKinstry, 13 Hun, 284. Streat vs Rothschild, 12 Abb. N. C. . ' Powell vs Waldron, 89 N. Y., 328. Carroll vs Deimel, 95 N. Y., 252. 94 ' CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 972.— Powell VB Waldron, 89 N. Y., 328. § 973.— Repealed 1877. § 974.— Cook vs Jenkins, 79 N. Y., 575. Brooklyn, &c., R. R. Co. vs Reid, 31 Hun, 273. Post vs Moran, 10 Daly, 503. §975. § 976. -Jones vs People, 79 N. Y.. 45. § 977.- -Laws 1883, ch. 96. Reilly vs Byrne, 1 McC. C. P., 301. g978. g 979. § 980.— state Bank vs Gill, 33 Hun, 406; 11 Week. Dig., 343. Bingham vs Bingham, 1 McC. C. P., 166. i981. § 982.— Home Ins. Co. vs Penn. R. B. Co., 11 Hun, 183. Cragin vs LoveU, 88 N. Y., 258; 3 Browne C. P., 138. Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co. vs Clark, 32 Hun, 506. FUess ts Buckley, 83 Hun, 551. Gorman vs South Boston Iron Co., 33 Hun, 71; 18 Week. Dig., 529. Roche vs Marvin, 93 N. Y., 398. Mayor vs Mayor, 2 McC. C. P., 171. Fletcher vs Cooper, 59 How., 378. Thompson vs Attica Water Co., 1 McC. C. P., 368. PoUey vs Wilkisson, 5 Browne C. P., 135. Thompson vs Heidenrioh, 66 How., 391. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 95 § 983.— Wintjen vs Verges, 10 Hun, 576. Veeder ve Baker, 83 N. Y., 156 : 11 Week. Dig., 230. Wiggin vs Phelps, 10 Hun, 187. Cragin vs Lovell; 88 N. Y., 358. Ackerman vs Delude, 29 Hun. 137 ; 16 Week. Dig.. 207. Gorman vs South Boston Iron Co., 33 Hun, Tl. Thompson vs Attica Water Co., 1 McC. C. P., 368. Polley vs Wilkisson, 5 Browne C. P.. 185. § 984.— Duche vs Buffalo Grape Sugar Co., 11 Abb. N. C, 333 ; 2 Browne C. P., 268 ; 2 McC. C. P., 114 ; 63 How., 516. Lyon vs Lyon, 80 Hun, 455; 17 Week. Dig., 534. Gor- man vs South Boston Iron Co., 32 Hun, 71. Smith vs Danzig, 3 Browne C. P., 127. Thompson vs Attica Water Co., 1 McC. C. P., 368. g 985.- Duche vs Buffalo Grape Sugar Co., 11 Abb N. C, 233; 2 Browne C. P., 268 : 2 McC. C. P., 114 ; 63 How., 516. Kimball vs Mapes, 19 Week. Dig., 481. § 986.— Van Dyck vs McQuade, 18 Hun, 376. Duche vs Buffalo Grape Sugar Co., 11 Abb. N. C , 338 ; 2 Browne C. P., 268 ; 3 McC. C. P., 114 ; 63 How., 516. Clark vs Campbell, 54 How., 166. Thompson vs Heidenrich, 66 How., 391. Kimball vs Mapes, 19 Week. Dig., 481. § 987.— McDonald vs McDonald, 14 Hun, 496. Veeder vs Baker, 83 N. Y., 156 ; 11 Week. Dig., 230. Gorman vs South Boston Iron Co., 32 Hun, 71 ; 18 Week. Dig., 529. Clark vs Campbell, 54 How., 166. Thompson vs Attica Water Co., 1 McC. C. P., 368. Acker vs Leland, 19 Week Dig., 366. § 988.— Amended 1877. Abrahams vs Bensen, 60 How., CODE ANNOTATIONS KEFERKING TO THE t; 989.— Amended 1877. S 990.— Amended 1879. .S99J. S 992.— Van Derlip vs Keyser, 68 N. Y., 443. Mead vs Smith, 28 Hun, 639 ; 3 Browne C. P., 171; 16 Week. Dig., 311. Mandeville vs Marvin, 30 Hun, 282. Ross vs Ross. 31 Hun, 140. Lawson v.a Jones, 1 McC. C. P., 247. Hepburn vs Montgomery, '> Browne C. P., 244. § 993.— James vs Cowing, 83 N. Y., 4.'50. Mead vs Smith, 28 Hun, 639 ; 8 Browne C. P., 171 ; 16 Week. Dig.. 211. Mandeville vs Marvin, 30 Hun, 282. Hepburn vs Mont- onmerv. .5 Browne C. P.. 244. § 994 —French vs Powers, 80 N. Y., 146; 58 How., 389. Goldschmidt vs Gold- Schmidt, 47 Super. Ct., 184. Aylesworth vs St. John, 2') Hun, 156. Mandeville vs Marvin. 30 Hun, 282. Ross.vs Eoss, 31 Hun, 140. S 995. — De Leon vs Echeverria, 45 Super Ct., 240. Henderson vs FuUerton, 54 How., 422. S 996. — Henderson vs Fullerton. 54 How., 422 § 997.— McLean vs Cole, 13 Hun, 300. Canzi vs Conner, 4 Abb. N. C, 148. Tyng \-s Marsh, 42 Super. Ct., 235. French vs Powers. 80 N. Y., 146 ; 58 How., 389. Sohwinger vs Raymond, S3 N. Y., 102 ; 11 Week. Dig., 336. Ingersoll vs Smith, 48 N. Y. Super. Ct.. 522 ; 62 How.. 474. Ray nor vs Raynor, 94 N Y'., 348. Leonard vs Mulry, 93 N. Y., 391 Ross vs Ross, 31 Hun, 140. Tliaver M'f g Jeuelrv Co. vs Steinan, 58 How., 315. Harris vs Van Wart, 19 Week. Dig., 29S. Reese vs Boese, 92 N. Y., 632: 16 Week. Dig., 563. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 97 § 99§. — Aylesworth vsSt. John, 25 Hun, 156. Goldsohmidt vs Goldschmidt, 47 Super. ( t., 184. In re Jackson, 32 Hun, 3U0 ; 19 Week. Dig , 370. French vs Powers, 58 Hun, 389; 80 N. Y., 146. Thayer M'f'g Jewelry Co. ys Steinan, 58 How., 315. WooUey vs Ste- was. 17 Week. Dig., 382. §999.— Wa vie vs Wavle, 9 Hun, 125. Duden vs Waitzfelder, 2 Abb. N. C, 295. Standard Oil Co. vs Amazon Ins. Co., 79 N. Y., 506; 9 Week. Dig., 465. DeLuce vs Kelly, •'') N. Y. Week. Dig., 32. Brooks vs Moore, 67 Barb.. 393. Clark vs Mech. Nat. Bank, 8 Daly, 481; 9 Week. Dig., 215. Knapp vs Post, 10 Hun, 35. DeLavalette vs Wendt, 11 Hun, 4;32. Shearman vs Henderson, 12 Hun, 170. Cheney vs N. Y. C, &c., R. R. Co., 16 Hun, 415. Robson vs N. Y. C, &c., R. R. Co., 21 Hun, 387. Tate vs MoCormick, 23 Hun, 218. Kelly vs Fi-azier, 27 Hun, 314; 2 Browne C. P., 322. Dusenbury vs Dusenbury, 61 How., 432; 1 McC. C. P., 392. Hersig vs Metzger, 63 How., 355. Naugatuck Cutlery Co. vs Rowe, 5 Abb. N. C, 143. Thayer Mfg. Jewelry Co. vs Steinan, 58 How., 315. PoUock vs Wannamaker, 65 How., 508. Schwab vs Elias, 2 Browne C. P., 340. Emerick vs Hefifernan; 19 Week. Dig., 351. Argall vs Jacobs, 56 How., 167. Gesoheidt vs Quirk, 5 Browne C. P., 38. i S 1000.— Laws 1882, ch. 29. Webster vs Cole, 17 Hun, 507. Ross vs Harden, 43 Super Ct., 437. Duraut vs Abendroth, 69 N. Y., 148. Douglas vs Haljerstro, 10 Abb. N. C, 6; 62 How., 29. Seeley vs N. Y. C, &c., R. R. Co., 35' Hun, 280; 13 Week. Dig., 108. Johnson vs N. Y., O. & W. R. R. Co., 30 Hun, 166. ' S 1001.- Bennett vs Austin, 10 Hun, 451. Hathaway vs Russell, 7 Abb. N. C, 138. Produce Bank vs Morton, 40 Super. Ct., 338; overruled 67 N. Y., 199; S. C, 42 Super. Ct., 473 Roe vs Roe, 14 Hun, 613. Walker vs Spencer, 86 N. Y., 162. Carr vs Thompson, 87 N. Y., 160. Raynor vs Raynor, 94 N. Y., 348. 98 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1002.— Amended 1884, ch. 403, p. 484. Sims vs Sims, 12 Hun, 231. Newhall is Appleton. 46 Super. Ct., 6.- Carr vs Thompson, 87 N. Y., 160. Kilmer vs O'Brien, 13 Hun, 224. Tunstall vs Winton, 31 Hun, 222. People vs Nat. Trust Co., 31 Hun, 26. Thayer Mfg. Jevrelry Co. vs Steinan 58 How., 315. § 10O3.— Dixon vs Rice, 16 Hun, 422. Smith vs Lapham, 87 N. Y., 631. Ohapin vs Thompson, 18 Hun, 446; rev'd 80 N. Y., 875; 58 How.. 46. Post vs Mason, 26 Hun, 187; 91 N. Y.. 539. Carroll vs Deimel, 95 N. Y., 252. Machen vs Lamar Ins. Co., 3 McCarty C. P., 81; 2 Browne C. P., 28. Henderson vs Fullerton, 54 How., 422. 1004. § 1005.— Chapin vs Thompson, 80 N. Y., 275; S. C, 18 Hun, 446: 58 How., 46; 9 Week. Dig., 512. Martin vs Rector, 11 Abb. N. C, 362. O'Gara vs.Kearney, r,7 How.. 439; 7" N. Y., 423. Douglass vs Haberstro, 62 How., 29; 10 Abb. N. C. 6. § 1006. § 1007. -Amended 1883, ch. 218, p. 835; 1884 chap. 277, p. 340. Horrocks vs Thomp- son, 27 Hun, 144, § 1008.— Wheelock vs Lee, 5 Abb. N. C, 75; 74 N. Y., 49.5. Thompson vs Finn,! Daly, 379. § 1009.— Morrell vs Morrell, 17 Hun, 324. Wheelock vs Lee, 5 Abb. N. C, 75; 74^. Y., 495. Fairchild vs Lynch, 42 Super. Ct., 26.5. Thompson vs Finn, 9 Daly. 379. Ken- neyvs Apgar, 93 N. Y., 540. Batzel vs Batzel, 42 Super. Ct., .561. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE." 99 § 1010.— Eaton vs Wells, 82 N. Y., 576. Weyman vs Broadway Bank, .59 How., 331. Adams vs Nellis, 59 How., 385. § 1011.- -Laws 1879, chap. .543. Chittenango Cotton Co. vs Stewart, 67 Barb., 423. Preston vs Morrow. 66 N. Y., 452. May vs Moore, 34 Hun, 351. MoCleary vs McClearv. 30 Hun, 154. § 1012.— McClearv vs McCleary, 30 Hun, 154. § 1013.— McDonald vs Stevens, 9 Hun, 38. Wood vs Hope, 2 Abb. N. C. 186. Concklin vs Taylor, 68 N. Y., 331. Camp vs IngersoU, 86 N. Y., 433; 1 McC. C. P., 340. Martin vs Windsor Hotel Co., 10 Hun, 304. Wickham vs Frazee, 13 Hun, 431. Barnes vs West, 16 Hun, 68. Dane vs Liverpool, &c., Ins. Co., 21 Hun, 359. Blackstone Nat. Bank vs Bogart, 41 Super. Ct., 393. Sullivan vs Sullivan, 41 Super. Ct., 519. Thompson vs Finn, 9 Daly, 379. Streat vs Rothschild, 13 Abb. N. C, 384, 889. O'Reilly vs City of Kingston, 30 Hun, 508. Read vs Lozin. 31 Hun, 286. People ex rel. Parmenter vs Wads- worth, 61 How., 57. Cassedy vs Wallace, 61 How., 340. Reilly vs Byrne, 1 McC. C. P., 201. Hull vs Allen, 4 Browne C. P., 300. § 1014.— Concklin vs Taylor, 68 N. Y., 331. ^ 1015.— Tammien vs Clause, 67 Barb., 430. O'Gara vs Kearney, 57 How., 439; 77 N. Y., 433. Exchange Fire Ins. Co. vs Early, 4 Abb. N. C, 78. Burnett vs Snyder, 41 Super. Ct., 343. Concklin vs Taylor, 68 N. Y., 331. Spelman vs Terry, 74 N. Y.. 448. Gillette vs Staples, 16 Hun 587. Camp vs IngersoU, 86 N. Y.; 433; 1 McC. C. P., 340. Jones TS Easton, 11 Abb. N. C, 114. Streat vs Rothschild, 13 Abb. N. C, 390. lOO CODE .ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §1016.— Nason vsLudington, 8 Daly, 149; 5o How., 343; 56 How., 173. Browning vs Marvin, 5 Abb. N. C, 285. ExchanKe Fire Ins. Co. vs Early, 4 Abb. N. C, 78; 5i How., 279; McGowan vs Newman. 4 Abb. N. C, 80; 54 How., 458. In re Accountingof Vilmar, 10 Daly, 15. § 1017.— Schroeter vs Schroeter, 23 Hun, 380. § 1018.— Chittenango Cotton Co. vs Stewart, 67 Barb., 433. Knapp vs Fowler, 26 Hun, 200. Dow vs Dorragh, 43 Super. Ct., 80. Horrocks vs Thompson, 37 Hun, 144. Knapp vs Fowler, 30 Hun, 513; S. C, 26 Hun, 300. New York El. K. R. Co. vs Mc Daniel, 81 Hun, 310. Naylor vs Naylor, 33 Hun, 338. N. Y. El. R. R. Co, vs Phila. Arch. Iron Co., 18 Week. Dig., 335. § 1019.— Laws 1883, ch. 397. Ballou vs Parsons, 67 Barb., 19. Parker vs Baxter, 19 Hun, 410. Geib vs Topping, 83 N. Y., 46. Phipps vs Carman, 33 Hun, 150. Quackenbusli vs Johnson, 55 How., 94. Bame vs Neuss, 2 Browne C. P., 185. Thornton vs Thornton, 66 How., 119. Little vs Lynch, 5 Browne C. P., 316. \ 1020. § 1021.— Amended 1879. Liegeois vs McCrackan, 23 Hun, 69. Smith vs Rathbun, 88 N Y., 600. Thompson vs Schieflelin, 4 Browne C. P., 370; 66 How., '235. § 1022.— Barker vs Burton, 67 Barb., 458. Hathaway vs Russell, 46 Super. Ct., 103. Horrocks vs Thompson. 27 Hun, 144. Argall vs Jacobs. 56 How., 167. Weyman vs Nat, Broadway Bank, 59 How., 331. Adams vs Nellis, 59 How., 385. Drury vs Wigg, W Week. Dig., 417. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. lOI § 10-23.— Sniffin vs Koechling, 45 Super. Gt., 61. Palmer vs Phoenix Ins. Co. 32 Hun, 334. Gormerly vs McGlynn, 84 N. Y., 284; 13 Week. Dig., 11. Hartwell vs McMasters, 4 Redf., 389. Ward vs Craig, 87 N. Y., 550. Farley vs Carpenter, 27 Hun, 359. Harris vs Van Wart, 19 Week. Dig., 298. Budlong vs Lewis, 25 Hjin, 310. Masterson vs Cran- itch, 18 Week. Dig., 41. § IOi24. § 1025.- -Devlin vs Mayor, 11 Week. Dig. , 116. §1026. § 1027.- -People vs Petrea, 92 N. Y., 128; 30 Hun, 98; 64 How., , 139; 65 id., . .59. g 102§. § 1029. § 1030.- -Amended 1879 and 1883, ch .400, p. 572. §1031. § 1032. 103:i. 1034. loas. § 103«.— People vs Petrea, 93 N. Y„ 128; 30 Hun, 98; 64 How., 139; 65 id., 59. 1037. § 1038.— People vs Petrea, 30 Hun, 98; 92 N. Y., 138; 64 How., 139; 65 id., 59. Pierson vs People, 79 N.Y., 424. I02 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § lO.-iO. -Laws 1880, ch. 108, p. 318. 1040. § 1041.— Amended 1881. People vs Petrea. 30 Hun. 98; 92 N. Y., 128; 64 How., 139- 6oifi.,59. People Ts Fitzpatrick, 66 How., 14. People vs Duff, 65 How., 365. § 1042.— People ts Petrea, 30 Hun. 98: 92 N. Y., 128; 64 How., 139; 65 id., 59. § 1043.— People vs Petrea, 30 Hun, 98; 93 N. Y., 128; 64 How., 139; 65 id.. 59. S 1014. § 1045. § 1046. S 1047. § 1048.— People vs Petrea. 30 Hun. 98; 92 N. Y.. 128; 64 How., 130; 65 id., 59. § 1049. g 1050.— Pierson vs People, 18 Hun. 239; aff'd 79 N. Y., 424. § 1051.— Pierson vs The People, 79 N. Y., 424. S 1052.— Pierson vs The People, 79 N. Y., 424. § 1053. §1054. § 1055. § 1056. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I03 1 1057. § 1058.— Pierson vs People, 18 Hun, 339; aff'd 79 N. Y., 424. § 1059.— Pierson vs People, 18 Hun, 239; aff'd 79 N. Y., 434. § 1060. § 1061. § 1062. § 1063. : 1064. 1 1065. 1066. § 106T.— People ex rel. Klrtland vs Dillon, 17 Hun, 1. § 106§.— Amended 1884, oh. 460, p. .533. § 1069.— Kelly vs Sheehy, 49 Super. Ct., 518. § 1070. § 1071. § 1072. § 1073. § 1074. § 1075. § 1076. § 1077. 104 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 107§. § 1079. § 1080. § 1081.— Amended 1879. Laws 1880, ch. 67, p. 172. § 1082. § I0S3. § 10§4. S 1085. g I086. § 1087. § 1088. § 1089. § 1090. § I091. § 1092. § 1093. § 1094. § 1095. g 1096. § 1097. § 1098. §1099. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I05 ,1100. 1101. g 1102. § 1103. §1104. § 1105. g 1106. 1107. 1108. g 1109. § 1110. 1111. 1 1112. i 1113.— Amended 1879. g 1114. §1115. § 1116. §1117. §1118. §1119. § 1120. §1121. Io6 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §1122. §1123. 1124. 1125. 1126. § 1127.— Amended 1879 and 1881. 112S. 1129. 1130. ill31. 1132. § 1133. §1134. 1135 1136. 1137. § 1138. § 1139. g 1140. g 1141.— Amended 1879. § 1142. S 1143. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 10/ §1144. 1145. 1146. 11147. § 114S. § 1 149. 1150. §1151. ;1152. UI53. i 1 154. S1155. §1156. §1157 § 1158. §1159. §1160. §1161. §1162. §1163. § 1164. §1165. I08 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §1166.— Amended 1883, ch. 234, p. 338. 1J67. § 1168. 1169. § 1170. § 1171,— Amended 1879. §1172. §1173. § 1174. § 1175. § 1176.— Greenfield vs The People, 74 N. Y., 377; 6 Abb. N. C, 1. §1177. §1178. §1179. §1180. §1181. §1182. §1183. §1184. § 1185.— Amended 1879. Fire Department vs Thomson, 16 Hun, 474. § 1186.— Lawrence vs ^tna Ins. Co., 21 Hun, 412. Casey vs Dwyre, 15 Hun, 153. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. IO9 § 11§7, — Lawrence vs JEtna Ins. Co., 31 Hun, 413. Ranney vs Warren, 17 Hun, 111. Ebersole vs Northern Central E. R. Co., 33 Hun, 114. § 118§.— Dempsey vs Mayor, &e., 10 Daly, 417. § 11§9,— Martin vs Rector, 11 Abb. N. C, 363; 3 Browne C. P., 134. 11190. >1191. ;1192. 1 1193. ; 1 194. §1195. ;il96. §1197. §1198. §1199. § laOO.— Amended 1877. Miller vs Sheldon, 15 Hun, 22U. Produce Bank vs Morton, 43 Super. Ct., 473. Meyers vs Becker, 29 Huu, 567. Valentine vs Central Nat. Bank, 10 Abb. N. C, 188. § 1201.— Repealed 1877. Lacustrine F. Co. vs Lake Guano, etc., Co., 16 Hun, 485; 56 How., 870. s 120a. no CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1203.— Schultz v8 Hoagland, 9 Week. Dig., 319. § 1204.— Doctor vs Smith, 16 Hun, 245. Smith vs Howard, 1 Sheldon (BuflEalo Super. Ct.) 14. Durham vs Lee, 47 Super. Ct., 174; 87 N. Y., 599: 60 How., 334. Lansing vs Hadsall, 36 Hun, 619. Dusenberry vs Fisher, 47 Super. Ct., 482. Albany City Savings Inst, vs Burdick, 87 N. Y., 40. Luce vs Alexander, 49 Super. Ct., 202; 4 Browne C. P., 428. Kenney vs Ap'gar, 93 N. Y., 539. Clegg vs Am. Newspaper Union, 60 How., 498; 19 Week. Dig., 23; 66 How., 411. §1205.— Luce vs Alexander, 49 Super. Ct., 202; 4 Browne C. P,, 428. j 1206.— Hartel vs Holland, 19 Week. Dig., 312. § 1207.— Fairchild vs Lynch, 42 Super. Ct., 265. Stevens vs Mayor, &c., of New York, 84 N. Y., 296. Smith vs Hathorn, 25 Hun, 159. Peck vs N. Y. & N. J. E. E. Co., 85 N. Y.. 246. Murtha vs Curley, 13 Abb. N. C, 12; 90 N. Y., 372; 3 Browne C. P., 1; 65 How., 372. Dusenberry vs Dusenberry, 2 McCarty C. P., 91; 4 Browne C. P., 126. Marie vs Garrison, 13 Abb. N. C, 210. Cornell vs Cornel], 19 Week. Dig., 184. Jencks vs Van Brunt, 19 Week. Dig., 278. Emigrant Ind. Sav'gs Bank vs Clute, 19 Week. Dig., 333. Edson vs Girvan, 17 Week. Dig., 106. § 1208.— Briggs vs Oliver, 68 N. Y., 336. g 1209. -Amended 1877. Valentine vs Cen't Nat. B'k, 10 Abb. N. C, 188. Crim vs Starkweather, 19 Week. Dig., 403. § 1210.— Tuomy vs Dunn, 77 N. Y., 515. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Ill § 1211.— Mclntyre vs Strong, 2 Browne C. P., 36; 63 How., 405; 48 Super. Ct., 399; 2McCartyC. P., 136. § 1212.— Amended 1879. Bullard vs Sherwood, 85 N. Y., 358. Meyers vs Becker, 39 Hun, 567. 8 121S.— Bullard vs Sherwood, 85 N. Y., 253. § 1214.— Goldschmidt vs Goldschmidt, 47 Super. Ct., 184. Horton vs LaDue, 59 How., 454. § 1215. — McGrOwan vs Newman, 4 Abb. N. C , 8l); 54 How., 458. Goldschmidt vs Goldschmidt, 47 Super. Ct., 184. McCleary vs McCleary, 30 Hun, 154. § 1216.— Plympton vs Bigelow, 11 Abb. N. C, 180; 12 Abb. N. C, 303; 29 Hun, 363; 93 N. Y., 592. Wood vs St. Louis, &o., Bolt Co., 1 McC. C. P., 230. Market Nat. Bank of N. Y., vs Pacific Nat. Bank, 3 Browne C. P., 330. § 1217.— Clarke vs Boreel, 31 Hun, 594. Plympton vs Bigelow, 11 Abb. N. C ISO; 13 Abb. N. C, 303; 39 Hun, 363; 93 N. Y., 593. Wood vs St. Louis, Sec, Bolt Co., 1 McC. C. P., 320. Market Nat. Bank of N. Y. vs Pacific Nat. Bank, 3 Browne C. P., 330. t^ 121S. -Amended 1879. Newins vs Baird, 19 Hun, 306. McMurray vs McMurray, 66 N. Y.. 175. S 1219.— Amended 1879. 112 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1220.— Leviu vs Haas, 25 Hun, 666. Valentine vs Cen't Bank, 10 Abb. N. C, 188.. Grim vs Starkweather, 19 Week. Dig., 403. § 1221.— Amended 1877. Valentine vs Cent. Nat. Bank, 10 Abb. N. C, 188. § 1222.— Amended 1879. Smith vs Rathbun, 88 N. Y., 660. Caro vs Met. El. R. R. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 371. § 122a.— Amended 1877. Meyers vs Becker, 29 Hun, 567. ^ 1224.— Amended 1877. Caro vs Met. El. R. R. Co., 2 Browne C. P., 371. Crimvs Starkweather, 19 Week. Dig., 403. § 1225.— Madison University vs White, 35 Hun, 490. 1226. § 1227. § 122S.— Amended 1879. Marvin vs Marvin, 75 N. Y., 340. Van Gelder vsVan Gelder, 26 Hun, 356. McCleary vs MoCleaiy, 30 Hun, 154. Ross vs Ross, 31 Hun, 140. Morgan vs Stevens, 6 Abb. N. C,, 356. S? 1229.— Anonymous, 3 Abb. N. C, 161. Schroeter vs Schroeter, 23 Hun, 230. Goldschmidt vs Goldschmidt, 47 Super. Ct., 184. McCleary vs McCleary, 30 Hun, 154. Ross vs Soss, 31 Hun, 140. Farace vs Farace, 1 McC. C. P., 419. § 1230.— Liegeois vs McCrackan, 22 Hun, 69; 10 Week. Dig., 454. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. II § 1231. § 1232.— Fischer vs Eaab, 57 How., 87. ; 1233. g 1234.— Durant vs Abendroth, 69 N. Y., 148. § 1235.— Munsell vs Flood, 46 Super. Ct., 134. ' § 1236.— Miller vs Sheldon, 15 Hun, 220. Sheridan vs Linden, 81 N. Y., 182. Whitney vs Townsend, 67 N. Y., 40 Knapp vs Roche, 82 N. Y., 366. Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. vs Lake Guano, &c. Co., 16 Hun, 484: S. C, 56 How., 370. ■ § 1237.— Amended 1879. Lyddy vs Chamberlain, 24 Hun, 377. § 1238.— Knapp vs Roche, 83 N. Y., 366; 10 Week. Dig., 187. S 1239. § 1240,— Randell vs DusenbeiTy, 41 Super. Ct., 457. O'Gara vs Kearney, 77 N. Y., 423; S. S., 57 How. Pr., 439. People ex rel. Fries vs Riley, 25 Hun, 587. Grotty vs McKenzie, 42 Super. Ct., 192. Noland vs Noland, 29 Hun, 630. In re Stockbridge and Marvin, 58 How., 128; 10 Daly, 33. Myers vs Becker, 19 Week. Dig., 39. § 1241,— Pritchard vs Pritchard, 4 Abb. N. C, 298. People ex rel. Fries vs Riley, 25 Hun, 587. Cochrane's ex'trs vs Ingersoll, 73 N. Y.. 618. Schulte vs Anderson, 48 N. Y., Super. Ct., 133. Noland vs Noland, 29 Hun, 630. O'Gara vs Kearney, 57 How., 439; 77 N.Y., 423. Mvers vs Becker, 10 Week. Dig., 39. Ryckman vs Ryckman, 19 Week. Dig,. 41., HaU vs U. S. Reflector Co., 4 Browne C. P., 148. 114 tUDE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE g 1242.— Bedford vs Tupper, 30 Hun, 174. § 1243. 55 1244.— Amended 1879. Randall vs Von Ellert, 4 Abb. N. C, 88; S. C, 12 Hun, •j.57;"54 How., 363. Bedford vs Tupper, 30 Hun, 174. Si 1245.— Union D. Sav'gs Inst, vs Duryea, 67 N. Y., 84. Green vs Milbank, 3 Abb. N. C., 138-150. Sheridan vs Linden, 81 N. Y., 182. § 1246.— Union D. Sav'gs Inst, vs Duryea, 3 Hun, 210; aff'd 67 N. Y., 84. Sheridan vs Linden, 81 N. Y., 182. People ex rel. Crittenden vs Keenan, 31 Hun, 625. Ryckman vs Ryckman, 19 Week. Dig., 41. § ia47.-Hobart vs Hobart, 86 N. Y., 636; S. C, 23 Hun, 484. People ex rel. Crit- tenden vs Keenan, 31 Hun, 625. § 124S. § 1249. § 1250. § 1251. — Bronner vs Loomis, 17 Hun, 439. Van Gelder vs Van Gelder, 26 Hun, 3.56' § 1252.— Bronner vs Loomis, 17 Hun, 439. Evans vs Hill, 1« Hun, 464. § 125». § 1254. — Bronner vs Loomis, 17 Hun. 439. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. II5 1255. , § 1256.— Union D. Sav'gs Inst, vs Duryea, 3 Hun, 210; aff'd 67 N. Y., 84. Green vs Milbank, 3 Abb. N. C, 138-150. Harmon vs Hope, 87 N. Y., 10. Briggs ts Brown. 13 '■• N. C, 481. 1 1257. g 1258. § 1259.— Harmon vs Hope, 87 N. Y., 10. g 1260. — Bensen vs Perry, 17 Hun, 16. Booth vs Farmers' and Mechanics' National Bank, 74 N. Y.. 228. S 1261 . § 1262. 1263. § 1264. 1265. § 1266.— Adams vs Bowe, 3 Browne C. P., 191; 13 Abb. N. C, 322. ^ 1267. § 1268.— 7ji re, Brandeth, 14 Hun, 585. Trimble vs Moore. 47 Super. Ct., 340. Pop- ham vs Barrette, 20 Hun, 299. Blumenthal vs Anderson, 28 Hun, 93; S. C. 91 N. Y., 171; 15 Week. Dig., 427; 16 id., 78. Fellows vs Kittredge, 56 How., 498. Arnold vs Oliver, 64 How., 453; 3 Browne C. P., 457. Seaman vs McReynoIds, 65 How'., 531. Il6 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1269.— Cook V8 Ryan, 29 Hun, 249. Blumenthal vs Anderson, 28 Hun, 93; 91 N. Y., 171; 15 Week. Dig., 427; 16 id., 78. S 1270. § 1271.— Stricken out in 1879. Tompkins vs Purcell, 12 Hun, 662. Goodyear D V. Co. vs Frisselle, 57 How., 255. § 1272. § 1273.— Field vs Bland, 8 Abb. N. C, 221; 81 N. Y., 339. Orleans Co. Nat. BankTs Spencer, 19 Hun, 569. § 1274.— Marrin vs Marrin, 27 Hun, 601; 15 Week. Dig., 339. Field vs Bland, 8 Abb. N. C, 221; 81 N. Y., 339. Orleans Co. Nat. Bank vs Spencer, 19 Hun, 569. Butts vs Sohiefeelin, 5 Browne C. P., 415. § 1275.— Grant vs Griswold, 31 Hun, 509. § 1276.— Amended 1879. § 1277. § 127S.— Candee vs Smith, 93 N. Y., 349; 18 Week. Dig., 1. Tripp vs Sanders, 59 How., 379. Orleans Co. Nat. Bank, vs Spencer, 19 Hun, 569. Smith vs Kihbe, 19 Week. Dig., 118; 31 Hun, 390. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 117 § 1279.— Waring vs O'Neil, 15 Hun, 105. Dickenson vs Dickey, 76 N. Y., 603. City ■of Buffalo vs Mackay, 15 Hun, 204. Kennedy vs Mayor, &c., of N. Y., 79 N. Y., 361. I Luhrs vs Eimer, 80 N. Y., 171. Iseman vs Myres, 26,Hun, 651. People vs Albany Ins. '.Co., 93 N. Y., 458. People vs Mut. End. and Ac. Assoc, 93 N. Y., 633. Bloomfield vs Ketcham, 95 N. Y., 657; 5 Browne C. P., 4u7; 18 Week. Dig., 540. McDonald vs- Ross- iXewin, 29 Hun, 88. § 12S0.— McDonald vs Eoss-Lewin, 29 Hun, 88. § 1281.— Waring vs O'Neil, 15 Hun, 105. Iseman vs Myres, 86 Hun, 651. People vs Mut. En. and Ac. Assoc, 93 N. Y., 632. McDonald vs Eoss-Lewin, 29 Hun, 88. N. Y., 1282.— Bissell vs N. Y. 0. & H. E. R. Co., 67 Barb., 385. Whitney vs Townsend, 67 , 40. McMurray vs McMurray, 66 N. Y., 175. In re Buffalo, 78 N. Y., 363. Spauld- ing vs Lyon, 3 Abb. N. C, 203. Jex vs Jacob, 7 Abb. N. C, 453. Mutual Life Ins. Co. vs HoUoday, 13 Abb. N. C, 16. § 1283.— Ira re Buffalo, 78 N. Y., 362. 1284. § 1283. § 1286.— Phillips vs Wheeler, 67 N. Y., 104. § 1287. § 1288. § 1289. Il8 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE I 1290.— 7ra re Buffalo, 78 N. Y., 363. Strong vs Strong, 3 Redf. Surr., 477. Under- wood TS Sutcliffe, 21 Hun, 357. Spaulding vs Lyon, 2 Abb. N, C, ,203. Trustee* Northern Dispensary of N. Y. vs Memam, 59 How. , 226. § 1291.— Mutual Life Ins. Co. vs Holloday, 13 Abb. N. C, 16. § 1292.— O'Gara vs Kearney, 77 N. Y., 423; S. C. 57 How. Pr., 439- Rogers vs Ivers, 23 Hun, 424. § 1293. § 1294.-Hobart vs Hobart, 86 N. Y., 636. Goldschmidt vs Goldschmidt, 47 Super. Ct., 184. Voorhees vs French, 47 Super. Ct., 364. Attorney General vs North Am. Life Ins. Co., 77 N. Y., 297. Louden vs Louden, 65 How., 411; 17 Weelj;. Dig., 477. § 1295.— MoLachlin vs Brett, 37 Hun, 18: 3 Browne C. P., 194. Flint vs Van Deu- sen, 24 Hun, 440. § 1296.— Attorney General vs Noi-th Am. Life Ins. Co., 77 N. Y., 397. MoLachlin v& Brett, 27 Hun, 18; 3 Browne C. P., 194. § 1297.— /k re Beckwith, 87 N. Y., 503. I 129S. § 1299.— 7re ye Beokwith, 87 N. Y., Wi. % 1300.— Raymond vs Richmond, 76 N. Y., 106. Cromwell vs-Burr, 9 Daly, 483. Mo- Lachlin vs Brett, 27 Hun, 18; 3 Browne C. P., 194. Langdon vs Evans, 39 Hun, 652. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. II9 § 1301.— Elliott vs' Lewis, 16 Hun, 581. Cameron vs Equitable Life Ins. Co., 45 Super. Ct., 628. Raymond vs Richmond, 76 N. Y., 106. Piper vs Van Buren, 27 Hun, 384; 15 Week. Dig., 213. Reese vs Smyth, 95 N. Y., 645. § 1302.— Miller vs Shall, 67 Barb., 446. Hickox vs Weaver, 15 Hun,- 375. § ISOS.— McKinstry vs Sahler, 17 Hun, 136. Roberts vs Davids, 12 Hun. 394. Eld- ridge vs Underbill, 17 Hun, 241. Architectural Iron Works vs City of Brooklyn, 85 N. Y., 652. Katz vsKuhn, 9 Daly, 172. Lavalle vs Skelly, 90 N. Y., 546; 16 Week. Dig., 41. Piper vs Van Buren, 27. Hun, 384. Wheeler vs Millar, 61 How., 396. § 1304. 1305. § 1306.— Mclntyre vs Strong, 48 N. Y., Super. Ct., 299; 63 How., 405; 2 McCarty C. P., 126; 2 Browne C. P., 36. Pringle vs Leverich, 1 MoC. C. P., 372 Yates vs Burch, 13 Hun, 622, S3 1307. § 1308.— Deering vs Metcalfe. 72 N. Y., 613. § 1309. § 1310.— Spears vs Mathews, 6 Hun, 489; rev'd 66 N. Y., 127. Power vs Village of Athens, 19 Hun, 165. Morey vs Tracy, 92 N. Y., 581; 17 Week. Dig., 146. Sudlow vs Pinckney, 1 Dem., 158. I20 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1311.— Katz vs Kuhn, 9 Daly, 172. Briggs vs Brown, 13 Abb. N. C, 481. § 1312.— Architectural Iron Works vs City of Brooklyn, 85 N. Y., 653. Hills vs Peekskill Savings Bank, 95 N. Y., 675; 19 Week. Dig., 112. §1313. § 1314. § 1315.-D0W vs Darragh, 92 N. Y., 537; 2 McC. C. P., 339. Reese vs Boese, 92 N. Y., 682. § 1316.— Elliott vs Lewis, 16 Hun, 581. Town of Lyons vs Chamberlin, 35 Hun, 49. Cameron vs Equitable Life Ins. Co., 45 Super. Ct., 638. Piper vs Van Buren, 37 Hun, 884; 15 Week. Dig., 213. Reese vs Smith, 95 N. Y., 645. Honegger vs Wetstein, 13 Abb. N. C, 394; 94 N. Y., 353. MoAlear vs Delaney, 19 Week. Dig., 353. § 1317.— Howk vs Bishop, 10 Hun, 509. Thaule vs Krekeler, 17 Hun, 338. Pollock vs Webster, 16 Hun, 104. Godfrey vs Moser, 66 N. Y. , 350. Lake vs Nathans, 67 N. Y., 589. Stanton vs King, 76 N. Y., 5S5. Whitehead vs Kennedy, 69 N. Y., 463; revg 7 Him, 380. Kingsley vs City of Brooklyn, 5 Abb., N. C, 3., Cameron vs Equitable Life Ins. Co., 45 Super. Ct., 628. Richardson vs Home Ins. Co., 47 Super. Ct., 138. Crim vs Stark- weather, 88 N. Y., 389. Cromwell vs Burr, 9 Daly, 482. Morss vs Hasbrouck, 2 McCaity C. P., 119; 10 Abb. N. C, 407. Mandeville vs Marvin, 80 Hun, 383. § 1318. — Vernon vs Palmer, 5 Browne C. P., 283. ^ 1319.— Estate of RuUard, 4 Browne C. P., 384. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 121 § 1320. 1S2I. § 1322. g 1323.— Amended 1880, oh. 539. O'Gara vs Kearney, 77 N. Y., 423; S. C, .57 How. Pr., 439. People ex rel. Dailey vs Livingston, 80 N. Y . 66. Mead vs Bateman, 9 Daly, 174. Kidd vs Curry, 39 Hun, 215. Martin vs Rector, 2 Browne C. P. , 184. ^ 1324. § 1325.— Miller vs Shall, 67 Barb., 446. Morrison vs Morrison, 16 Hun, 507. Blake vs Lyons & Fellows M'f'g Co., 75 N. Y.. 611. S 1326.— Cowdin vs Teal, 67 N. Y., 581. Raymond vs Richmond, 76 N. Y., 106. Blake vs Lyon & FeUows M'f'g Co.. 75 N. Y., 611. Morss vs Hasbrouck, 10 Abb. N. C, 407; 63 How.. 84; 2 McC. C. P., 119. Benedict, &c., M'f'g Co. vs Thayer, 83 N. Y., 610. Burdette Ts Lowe, 85 N. Y., 241. Architectural Iron Works v? City of Brooklyn, id., 652. Mclntyre vs Strong, 48 N. Y., Super. Ct., 299; 3 McCarty C. P., 126: 3 Browne C. P.. 86: 68 How., 405. Reese vs Boese, 92 N. Y., 632. Delamater vs Byrne. 57 How., 71. § 1327.— Blake vs Lyons & Fellows M'f'g Co., 75 N. Y., 611. Morss vs Hasbrouck, Id Abb. N. C, 407; 63 How., 84; 3 McC. C. P., 119. Grow vs Garlock, 39 Hun, 598; 17 Week. Dig., 400. HoUister vs McNeill, 31 Hun. 639; 18 Week. Dig., 518. Delamater vs Byrne, 57 How., 170. Grim wood vs Wilson, 66 How., 383. Grow vs Snell, 4 Browne C. P., 884: 17 Week. Dig., 400. 122 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1S2§.— Laws 1880, ch. 529, p. 746. Morss vs Hasbrouok, 63 How., 301; 10 Abb. N. C.,407; 2 Browne C. P., 119. § 1329.— Morss vs Hasbrouck, 10 Abb. N. C, 407; 63 How., 201; 3 Browne C. P., 119. Dunseith vs Linke, 10 Daly, 363. § 1330.— Morss vs Hasbrouck, 63 How., 301; 10 Abb. N. C, 407; 2 Browne C. P., 119. § 1331.— Amended 1879. O'SuUivan vs Connors, 33 Hun, 137. Grow vs Garlock,29 Hun, 598; 17 Week. Dig., 400. Fitch vs Best, 13 Week. Dig., 344. Troy & Boston R. E, Co. vs B., H. T. & W. R. R. Co., 57 How., 181. Grow vs Snell, 4 Browne C. P., 334; 17 Week. Dig., 400. § 1332.— Morss vs Hasbrouck, 10 Abb. N. C, 407; 3 McCarty C. P., 119; 63 How., 301. Briggs vs Brown, 13 Abb. N. C, 481. Manning vs Gould, 90 N. Y., 476; 64 How., 429. § 1333. § 1334.— Amended 1879. Raymond vs Richmond, 76 N. Y., 106. Morss vs Has- brouck, 10 Abb. N. C, 407; 2 McC. C. P., 119: 63 How., 84. Bassett vs Wheeler, 84N. Y., 466. Delamater vs Byrne, 57 How. , 170. Wheeler vs Millar, 61 How., 896. GrimwoodVs Wilson, 66 How., 283. Hurd vs Hannibal & St. Jo. R. R. Co., 19 Week. Dig., 464, § 1335.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 397. Mannmg vs Gould. 90 N. Y., 476; 2 McCartry C. P., 310; 3 Browne C. P., 58; 64 How., 439; 16 Week. Dig., 41; 47 Super. Ct, 387. Wheeler vs Millar, 61 How., 396. Hooker vs Townsend, 66, How., 349. Roos vs Maik- ham, 5 Browne C. P., 81. CODE OF Civil. PROCEDURE. 1 23 § 1386.— Rust vs Haselt, 69 N. Y , 485. Walker vs Spencer, 86 N. Y., 162. Raynor vs Raynor, 94 N. Y., 848; 18 Week. Dig., 379. Victory vs Blood, 93 N. Y., 650. § 1337.— Lawrence vs Farley, 73 N. Y., 187. In re probate will of Ross, 87 N. Y., .514. JnreS., 85N. Y., 630. Bassett vs Wheeler, 84 N. Y, 466. Davis vs Clark, 87 N. Y.. 633; 3 McCarty C. P., 1. Snyder vs Sherman, 88 N. Y., 656. Western Transportation, &c., Co. vs Kilderhouse, 87 N. Y., 430. In re application of N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co , 90 N. Y., 343. Hynes vs McDermott, 91 N. Y., 452. In re Cottrell, 19 Week. Dig.. 2: 9.5 N. Y., 389; 5 Browne C. P., 340. § 133§.— Godfrey vs Moser, 66 N Y.. 350. Van Tassell vs Wood, .76 N. Y., 614. Goodwin vs Conklin, H5 N. Y., 81. Van Wyck vs Watters, 81 N. Y., 353. Weyer Vh Beach. 79 N. Y., 409. In re probate will of Ross, bT N. Y., 514. Western Transportation. &c.. Co. vs Kilderhouse. 87 N. Y., 430. Hynes vs McDermott, 91 N. Y., 453. Davis vs Leopold, 78 N. Y., 630. In re Cottrell, 19 Week. Dig.. 3: 95 N. Y.. 339: 5 Browne C. P., 340. § 1339.— Cohn vs Goldman. 76. N. Y., 384. ^ 1340. — People ex rel. Board of Charities vs Davis, 15 Hun, 309. Andrews vs Long, 79 N'. Y., 573. In re Beckwith, 15 Hun, 336. Roberts vs Marson, 31 Hun, 363. Warner vs Henderson, 35 Hun, 303. People ex rel. Fuller vs Carney, 39 Hun, 47. Fish vs Thrasher, 81 Hun, 15. Coleman vs Phelps. 1 McC. C. P.. 9; 84 Hun, 330. § 1341.— /n re Beckwith, 15 Hun, 386. Miller vs Shall, 67 Barb., 446. 124 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § IS42.— Amended 1881. Newell vs Cutler, 19 Hun, 74. Andrews vs Long, 79 N.Y., 573; 19 Hun, 303. Fish vs Thrasher, 31 Hun, 15. Kinoaid vs Richardson, 35 Hun, 237. Roberts vs Marson, 31 Hun, 363. In re McArdle, 30 Hun, 465. Matteson vs Hall, 64 How., 515. § 1343.— Andrews vs Long, 79 N. Y., 573. § 1344.— Andrews vs Long, 79 N. Y., 573. § 1345.— Andrews vs Long, 79 N. Y., 573. § 1346. - Cheney vs N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co. , 16 Hun, 415. Van Doren vs Horton, 19 Hun, 7. Allen vs Eighmie, 14 Hun, 559. Manning vs Gould, 90 N. Y., 476; 3 McC. C. P., 810. Mandeville vs Marvin, 30 Hun, 383. '§ 1347.— Van Gelder vs Van Gelder, 13 Hun, 118. Uline vs N. Y. C. & H. R. K. Co., 79 N. Y., 175. Garner vs Harmony Mills, 6 Abb. N. C, 312. Wright vs Fleming, 18 Hun, 360. Hand vs Burrows, 15 Hun, 481. People vs Common Council of Buffalo, 30 Hun, 636. People vs Nat. Trust Co., 31 Hun, 20. Read va Lozin, 30 Hun, 386. Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. vs Lake Guano Co., 56 How., 370; 16 Hun, 484. In re Nat. Trust Ck), 4 Browne C. P., 304. Londriggan vs N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 5 Browne C. P.. 76; & Super. Ct., 536; 12 Abb. N. C. 373. § 134§.— Pool vs Saflord, 10 Hun, 497. Uline vs N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co.. 79 N. Y., 175. O'Brien vs Hashagen. 20 Hun, 564. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 12=: g 1349.— Van Gelder vs Van Gelder, 13 Hun. 118. Hathaway vs RusseU, 7 Abb. N. C , 138. Miller vs Sheldon, 15 Hun, 220. Wright vs Fleming. 18 Hun. 360. Coleman vs Phelps, 24 Hun, 320. Victory vs Blood. 93 N. Y., 650. Cambridge Valley Nat. Bank v& Lynch, 76 N. Y., 514. Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. vs Lake Guano Co., 16 Hun, 484; S. C. 5(> How., 370. Walker vs Spencer, 86 N. Y., 162. Hand vs Supervisors of Columbia Co., 31 Hun, 531; 19 Week. Dig., 40. ' § i 350. — Miller vs Sheldon, 15 Hun. 220. Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. vs Lake Guano, &c., Co., 16 Hun, 484; S. C. 56 How., 370. Raynor vs Raynor, 94 N. Y., 248; 18 Week. Dig., 279. Victory vs Blood, 93 N. Y., 650. McAlear vs Delaney, 19 Week. Dig., 252. § 1351.— MiUer vs ShaU, 67 Barb., 446. Spears vs Mathews, 6 Hun, 489; rev'd 66 X. Y., 127. Kilmer vs Hathom, 78 N. Y., 228. Wilson vs Grant, 59 How., 350. Miller vs Sheldon, 15 Hun, 220. Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. vs Lake Guano, &c., Co., 16 Hun. 484; S. C. 56 How . 370. Rollins vs Wood, 16 Hun, 586. Coleman vs Phelps, 24 Hun, 330; 1 McC. 0. P., 9. Heilner vs Walsh, 47 Super. Ct.. 369. Manning vs Gould, 47 Super. Ct., 387; 90 N. Y., 476; 2 McC. C. P., 310; 1 id., 216. Baker vs Hatfield, 29 Hun, 670; 3 Browne C, P.. 303. Hull vs Hart. 27 Hun, 31. Langdon vs Evans, 39 Hun, 652. LavaUe vs Skelly, 90- N. Y , 546. Read vs Lozin, 31 Hun, 286. Delamater vs Bvrne, 57 How. , 170. § 1352. — Waring vs Somborn, 13 Hun, 81. People ex rel. Cantrell vs Alker, id., 88. Spears vs Ma.thews, 6 Hun, 489; rev'd 66 N. Y., 127. Moak vs Hayes, 25 Hun, 316. Man- ning vs Gould, 90 N. Y., 476; 47 Super. Ct., 387; 2 McC. C. P., 310; 64 How., 429: 3 Browne C. P., 58; 16 Week. Dig., 41. 126 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE, § 1353.— Weseman vs Wingi-ove, 85 N. Y., 353. /?; re Swpzey, 64 How., 331. Pool Ts Johnston, 19 Week. Dig., 43. § 1354.— Amended 1879. Knapp vs Eoche, 82 N. Y., 366. S 1355. -Manning vs Gould, 90 N. Y.. 476; 64 How., 439; 47 Super. Ct., 387; 3 Browne €, P., 58; 2 McC. C. P., 310. § 1356. — People ex rel. Lowenbein vs Donohue, 15 Hun, 418. In re Jetter, 78 N. Y., 601. People ex rel. Negus vs Dwjei; 90 N. Y., 402; 2 Browne C P., 379. In re Swezey, 64 How., 331. Poole vs Johnston, 19 Week. Dig., 43; 5 Browne C. P.; 279. § 1357. — People ex rel. Board of Charities vs Davis, 15 Hun, 209. In re Jetter, 78 N. Y., 601. Kincaid vs Richardson, 25 Hun, 237. People ex rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 90 N. Y., 403; 2 Browne C. P., 379. teople ex rel. Fuller vs Carney, 29 Hun. 47. § 1358.— People ex rel. Green vs Smith, 13 Hun, 237 § 1359.— People ex rel. Green vs Smith, 13 Hun, 227. 1360. § 1361.— 7/( re Swezey, 64 How., 331. Pool vs Johnston, 19 Week. Dig., 43. 1362. § 1363. g 1364. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 12/ §1365. — Disosway vs Hayward, 1 Dem., 175. Prime vs Anderson, 29 Hun, 644. Kupfer vs Frank, 30 Hun, 74; 65 How., 396; 4 Browne C. P. , 53. § 1366.— Heilner vs Walsh, 47 Super. Ct., 269. Wright vs Nostrand, 47 Super. Ct.. 441. " Douglas vs Haberstro, 88 N. Y., 611; 2 Browne C. P., 186: 63 How,, 457; 25 Hun, 262. Ansonia B. & C. Co. vs Conner, 3 Browne C. P., 88. People e.r rel. Brown vs Van Hoesen, 62How., 76. Whitman vs James, 10 Daly, 490. ^ ^ /^"^^^ i^-/ § 1367.— Ennis vs Broderiok, 45 Super. Ct., 92. § 1368.— Todd vs Botchford, 86 N. Y., 517; 1 McC. C. P.. 402. Whitman vs .James. 10 Daly, 490. § 1369.— Disosway vs Hayward, 1 Dem., 175. Woolworth vs Taylor, 62 How, 9l). § 1370.— Place vs Riley, 32 Hun, 17; 4 Browne C. P., 398. § 1371.— Commissioners of Excise vs McGrath, 27 Hun, 435. Felt vs Dorr, 29 Hun, 14; 16 Week. Dig., 385. Lichtenberg vs Herdtf elder, 5 Browne C. P., 426. g 1372.— People ex rel. Brack vs Reilly, 58 How., 318. 1373. § 1374.— Morgan vs Stevens, 6 Abb. N. C., 356. Whitman vs James, 10 Daly, 490. § 137.5.— Spaulding vs Lyon, 2 Abb. N. C, 203. Kupfer vs Frank, 30 Hun, 74; 65 How., 396; 4 Browne C. P., 53. 128 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § ISye.— Walker vs Donovan, 6 Daly, 553 Kincaid vs Rlchardaon, 9 Abb N. C , 315; 25 Hun, 337. Pardee vs Tilton, 30 Hun. 76. Duryee vs Botsford, 34 Hun, 317. Grill ts Kommeyer, 56 How., 276. § 1377.— Amended 1879. Marine Bank vs Van Brunt, 11 Hun. 379. Frean vs Gar. rett. 24 Hun, 161. S 137§.— Kincaid vs Richardson, 9 Abb. N C, 316; 35 Hun, 237. § 1S79.— Wadley vs Davis, 30 Hun, 570; 29 Hun, 12. § 13§0.— Amended 1879. In re Clark, 2 Abb. N. C, 208. Kerr vs Kreuder. 28 Hun, 452; 16 Week. Dig., 85. Wadley vs Davis, 30 Hun, 570; 29 Hun, 13. g 13§1.— Freeman vs Nelson, 4 Eedf., 874. Kerr vs Kreuder, 38 Hun, 453; 16 Week. Dig., 85. Wadley vs Davis, 30 Hun, 570; 39 Hun, 13. Gillies vs Kreuder, 1 Dem., 349. § 13§2. § 1383.— Jji re Clark, 3 Abb. N. C, 208. g 13§4. S 13§5. 13§6. § 13§7. § 138§. §1389. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 29 gl»90. § 1391.— Amended 1879. Brown vs Davis, 9 Hun, 43. Russell vs Dean, 30 Hun, 242. Keiher vs Shlpherd, 4 Browne C. P. , 274. § 1392. § 1393. ; 1394. i 1395. 1396. § 1397.— Amended 1883, ch. 156, p. 1.55. 139S. 1399. 1400. §1401. ; 1402. , 1403. § 1404. J 1405.— Smith vs Erwin, 77 N. Y.. 466. Read vs MoLanahan, 47 Super. Ct., 275. n vs Steffin, 4 Browne C. P., 179. Lyman vs Bowe, 5 Browne C. P., 157. § 1406. § 1407. 130 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE S 140§. 1409. 1410. 1411. § 1412.— Read vs McLanahan, 47 Super. Ct., 375. § 1413.— Read vs McLanahan, 47 Super. Ct., 375. § 1414.— Read vs McLanahan, 47 Super. Ct., 375. 1415. 1416. § 1417.— Read vs McLanahan, 47 Super. Ct , 375. 1418,— People vs Hall, 31 Hun, 404. § 1419. — Second National Bank of Oswego vs Dunn, 3 Browne C. P., 259; 4 Browne 0. P., 378. 1420. § 1421.— Hessberg vs Riley, 91 N. Y., 377; 3 Browne C. P., 165; 16 Week. Dig., 331. Hein vr Davidson, 18 Week. Dig., 381; 66 How.. 354; 19 Week. Dig., 176; 5 Browne C. P., 38; id., 391. § 1422.— Hessberg vs Riley, 8 Browne C. P., 165; 91 N. Y., 377. Hein vs Davidson, 66 How., 354; 19 Week. Dig., 176; 5 Browne C. P., 38; id.. 391. CODE OF Civil, PROCEDURE. I3I § 1483.— Hessberg vs Riley, 3 Browne C. P., 165; 91 N. Y., 377. Hein vs Davidson, 66 How., 354; 19 Week. Dig., 176; 5 Browne C. P.. 28; id., 391. § 1484.— Hein vs Davidson, 19 Week. Dig., 176; 66 How., 354: 5 Browne C. P., 28; id., 391. § 1425.— Hein vs Davidson, 19 Week. Dig., 176; 66 How., 354; .5 Browne C. P.. 28: id., 391. § 1426.- -Hessberg vs RUey, 3 Browne C. P., 165; 91 N. Y., 377. § 1487. • § 1488.- -Read vs McLanahan, 47 Super. Ct., 275. Chapman vs Morrill, 19 Hun, 318. §1429. § 1430. 1 1431. § 1438. , 1433. i 1434. 1435. § 1436. g 1437.- Mclntyre vs Sanford, 2 Browne C. P., 306; 89 N. Y., 634; 9 Week. Dig., 277. § 1 43§.— O'Brien vs Hashagen, 20 Hun, .564. 132 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1439,— Clute vs Emmerich, 10 Week. Dig., 138. § 1440.— Amended 1881. Ford va Knapp, 31 Hun, 532. Mclntyre vs Sanford, 89 N Y., 634; 3 Browne C. P., b06; 9 Week. Dig., 377. 1 1441,— Ford vs Knapp, 31 Hun, 532. 1443. § 1443. 1444. § I44S, § 1446,— Boyce vs Wight, 3 Abb. N. C, 163. § 1447. § 144§.— Boyce vs Wight, 2 Abb. N. C, 163. Gotendorf vs Goldschmidt, 88 N. Y., 110. 1 1449. § 1450.— Youmans vs TeiTy, 19 Week. Dig., 369. § 1451. § 1452. § 1453. '■■ § 1454. § 1455. §1456! T' § 1457. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 133 i 145S. ^ 1459. § 1460. § 1461.— Ford vs Knapp, 31 llun, 532. Bennett vs Bagley, 32 Hun, 408. § 1462. § 1463. § 1464.— Nehrboss vs Bliss, 88 N. Y., 600; 3 McCarty C. P., 106; 14 Week. Dig., 308; 2 Browne C. P., 39. Brackett vs Miller, 13 Week. Dig., 335. § 1465. § 1466.— Nehrboss vs Bliss, 3 McCarty C. P., 106; 88 N. Y., 600; 14 Week. Dig., 308; 2 Browne C. P., 39. § 1467. § 146§. § 1469. § 1470. §1471. § 1472. § 1473. § 1474. § 1475. S 14761 134 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1477. §147§. S 1479. 14§0. 14S1. 1482. § 1483. 1484. 1485. , 1486. § 1487.— Amended 1879. Taylor vs Faas, 14 Hun, 166. Catlin vs Adirondack Co., 20 Hun, 19. Segelken vs Meyer, 94 N. Y., 473; 5 Browne C. P., 358. ^tna Ids. Co. v^ Shuler, 88 Hun, 338; 16 Week. Dig., 33. Keller vs Strasburger, 90 N. Y., 379. Parker va Speer, 49 Super. Ct., 1; 63 How., 394. Lawrence vs FoxweU, 49 Super. Ct., 378. Haines, vs Jerolman, 3 McC. C. P., 196. Whitman vs James, 63 How., 133; 1 McC. C. P., 335. United States vs Reid, 4 BrowHe C. P., 1. § 1488.— Amended 1879. § 1489. § 1490. §1491. § 1492. § 1493. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 135 1494. § 149S. § 1496.— /?i re will of Gates, 36 Hun, 179. VanVoorhis vs Kelly, 31 Hun, 393. 1497. § 149§.— Meigs vs Willis, Browne C. P., 106. § 1499. § 1500.— Smith vs Long, 3 Browne C. P., 896. §1501.— Laws 1883, ch. 399. Chamberlin vs Taylor, 36 Hun, 601; 13 Abb. N. C, 473; 92 N. V., 348. Adriance vs Sanders, 11 Abb. N. C, 433; 2 McC. C. P., 363. Smith vs Long, 3 Browne C. P., 396; 13 Abb. N. C, 113. VanVoorhis vs KeUy, 31 Hun, 393. § 1502.— Gibbs vs Estey, 10 Week. Dig., 554. Rank vs Levinus, 5 Browne C. P., 368. § 1503. § 1504.— Horton vs N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 13 Abb. N. C, 30. ^ 1505. g 1506.- — Horton vs N. Y. C. &H. R. R. R. Co., , 12 Abb. N. c, , 30. § 1507.- —Horton vs N. Y. C. &H. R. E. R. Co., , 12 Abb. N. C; , 30. § 1508.— Horton vs N. Y. C. & H. R. E. R. Co., 12 Abb. N. C, 30. § 1509. ~~ § 1510. 136 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1511.— Rank vs Levinus, 5 Browne C. P., 368. § 1512. §1513. § 1514. 1515. § 1516. § 1517. §151§. §1519. § 1320. § 1521. § 1522. § 1523, § 1524.— Post vs Moran, 61 How,, 121: 1 McC. C. P., 323. § 1525.— Sacia vs O'Conner, 79 N. Y., 360; 47 Super. Ct.. 53: 11 Week. Dig,, 440. Martin vs Rector, 11 Abb. N. C, 363; 2 McC. C. P., 815; 63 How., 362. Howell vs Leavitt, 90 N. Y.. 238; 15 Week. Dig.. 377; 3 Browne C. P., 447. Post vs Moran, 61 How.. 121; 1 McC. C. P., 333. § 1526.— Howell vs Leavitt. 90 N. Y., 338; 15 Week. Dig., 377. Martin vs Rector, 2 McC. C. P.. 315; 11 Abb. N. C, 363; 63 How.. 362. Post vs Moran, 1 McC. C. P., 233; 61 How., 121. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 37 § 1527. § 1S2§. § 1529.— Martin vs Rector, 11 Abb. N. C, 362; 2 McC. C. P., 215; 63 How., I Carleton vs Mayor, 5 Browne C. P., 418. § 1530. §• 15.11.^— Pierson vs SafEord, 30 Hun, 531. Daniel vs Daniel, 3 Browne C. P., 238. § 1532.— Harris vs Larltins, 22 Hun, 488. § 1533.— Hughes vs Hughes, 11 Abb. N. C, 37; S. C, 30 Hun, 349; 2 McCarty C. P., 100; 63 How., 408; 2 Browne C. P., 139. Soheu vs Lehning, 31 Hun, 183; 66 How., 231; 18 Week. Dig., 261; 4 Browne C. P., 385. 1 1534. , 1535. § 1536.— Amended 1884, ch. 404, p. 484. Thistle vs Thistle, 66 How., 472; 5 Browne C. P., 4a. § 1537.— Velie vs Newark City Ins. Co., 12 Abb. N. C, 309. Harris vs Larkins, 22 Hun, 488. Ward vs Ward, 23 Hun, 431. § 1538.— Bergen vs WyckofiE, 11 Week. Dig., 507. 1539. 1540. 13 ;8 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFEJIRING TO THE § 1541.— O'Neil vs Bender, 30 Hun, 204. § 1542. § 1543. — Barnard vs Onderdonk, 11 Abb. N. C, 349. Haggerty vs Andrews, 94 N. Y., 195; 4 Browne C. P., 328. • § 1544.— Streat vs Rothschild, 12 Abb. N. C, 388 (note). Cassedy vs Wallace, 61 How., 240. 1545. 1546. 1547. 1548. § 1549. I 1550. 1551. 1552. 1553. > 1554. 1555. § 1556. § 1557. § 155S. § 1559.— Weed vs Paine, 31 Hun, 10; 13 Abb. N. C, 200. CODE OF, CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 39 1560. 1561. g 1562. ^1563 1 1564. ; 1565. § 1566. § 1567. ) isen. § 1569.— Rockwell vs Decker, 5 Browne C. P., 63. § 15 70. —Rockwell vs Decker, 5 Browne C. P., 62. §1571. § 1572. 1573. 1574. §1575. § 1576. § 1577. § 1578.— Amended 18S3, ch. 393, p. 569. § 1579.— Weed vs Paine, 31 Hun, 10; 13 Abb. N. C, 200. § 15§0.— Rockwell vs Decker, 5 Bruwiie U. P., 62. I40 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1581. § I5§2. § 1583. ; 1584. ^ 1585. § 1586. 1587. § 1588. §1589. § 1590. \ § 1591. ,| § 1592. § 1593. § 1594. § 1595. § 1596.— Amended laws 1882, ch 377. Aikman vs Harsell, 18 Week. Dig., 389; 5- Browne C. P., 93. §1597. §1598. §1599. g 1600. §1601. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I4I §1602. §1603. § 1604. §1605. §1606. § 1607. § 1608. § 1609. § 1610. § 1611. § 1612. § 1613. § 1614. § 1615. § 1616. § 1617. § 1618. § 1619. §1620. § 1621. § 1622. § 1623. 142 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1624. § 1625. § 1626. § 1627.- — Vanderbilt vs Schreyer, 13 Abb. N. c... ,390, 395. § 162§.— Vanderbilt vs Schreyer, 12 Abb. N. C, 390, 395. Wyckoff vs Devlin, 17 Week. Dig., 467. 1629. g 1630. 1631. 1632. 1633.— White vs Poillon, 25 Hun, 69. 1634. §1635. § 1636. § 1637. § 163§.— Stamm vs Bostwick, 30 Hun, 70; 3 McC. C. P., 467; 65 How., 358. Wilson vB Kelly, 31 Hun, 75. § 1639. § 1640. §1641. () 1642. 164». § 1644. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I43 §1645. 1646 § 1647. § 1648. , 1649. 1650. 1651. , 1652. § 1653. i 1654. 1655. 1656. § 1657. § 165S. \ 1659. g 1660.— Wenzlick vs McCotter, 10 Week. Dig., 499 ; 3a Hun, 60 ; 87 N. Y., 133. § 1661.— Wenzlick vs McCotter, 10 Week. Dig., 499 ; 32 Hun, 60 ; 87 N Y., V>2. 1662.— People vs Met. Telegraph and Telephone Co., 31 Hun, 596. ^ 1663. 144 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1664. § 1665. e 1666. 1667. ^ 1668. 1669. § 1670— Brainerd vs White, 48 N. Y. Super Ct., 399; 12 Abb. N. C.,407. Kiinz vs Bachman, 61 How., 519 ; 1 McC. C. P., 381. § 1671.- -Weyh vs Boylan, 62 How. ,397; 63 id., , 72; 14 Week. Dig., ,347. § 1672. § 1673. § 1674. § 1675. § 1676.- -Simms vs Voght, 11 Abb. N. C. ,48. § 1677. § 1678.— Amended 1881. Valentine vs McCue, 36 Hun, 456. Wallace vs Feely, 61 How., 335; 1 McC. C. P., 136; 10 Daly, 881. 1679. , 1680. 11681. i 1682. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 145 § 1683. ^ 1684. S 1685. § 1686.— Segelken vs Meyer, 94 N. Y., 473. § 1687. > 1688. § 1689. § 1690.— Second National Bank vs Dunn, 63 How., 434; 4 Browne C. P., 378. § 1691. -Chenango Bridge Co. ts Paige, 83 N. Y., 178. § 1692. 1693.— Acker vs Hauteman, 27 Hun, 48; 63 How., 380; 14 Week. Dig., 223 § 1694.— First Nat. Bank of Oswego vs Dun, 4 Browne C. P., 378. § 1695.— American Tool Co. vs Smith, 32 Hun, 131. 1696. i 1697. ; 1698. 1 1699. § 1700.— Second Nat'l Bank vs Dunn, 63 How., 434; 2 Browne C. P., 359; 4 id., 378. §1701. § 1702.— First Nat. Bank vs Dunn, 29 Hun, 539; 4 Browne C. P., 378; 63 How., 280. 146 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1703.— First Nat. Bank vs Dunn, 39 Hun, 529; 4 Browne C. P., 378; 63 How., 280. § 1704.— Tesohner vs Deveron, 59 How., 467. § 1705. § 1706.— Teschner vs Deveron, 59 How., 467. 1707. § 1708. g 1709.— Second National Bank of Oswego vs Dunn, 3 Browne C. P.. 259; 63 How., 434; 4 Browne C. P., 378. Hudson vs Swan, 11 Week. Dig., 456. § 1710. § 1711. § 1712.— Second National Bank vs Dunn, 63 How., 484; 4 Browne C. P., 378. § 1719— In re Wilds, 6 Abb. N. C, 307. 1714, 1715, S 1716. § 1717.— In re Wilds, 6 Abb. N. Q., 307. 1718. §1719. § 1720.— Morrison vs Lewis. 49 Super. Ct., 178; 4 Browne C. P., 437. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 147 SlTil.— Chapin vs Merchants' National Bank, 31 Hun, 529. Davenport Glucose Mf g Co. vs Tausig, 31 Hun 563; 5 Browne C. P., 69. § 1722. § 1723. 1724. § 1725.— Knapp vs Scheider, 10 Daly, 818. § 1726.— Delin vs Stohl, 2 Browne C. P., 222. §1727. § 1728.- -Whitney vs N. Y. & A. E. R. Co., 19 Week. Dig., 236. § 1729,- —Landers vs Bartle, 29 Hun, 170. § 1730,— Delin vs Stohl, 2 Browne C. P., 222. , 1731 . i 1732. § 1733. § 1734. 1733. § 1736.— Bumham vs Brennan, 60 How., 310. is 1737,- Carpenter vs Lott, 31 Hun, 349. Bowe vs U. S Reflector Co., 4 Browne C. P., 1.54. I 173§.— Carpenter vs Lott, 31 Hun, 349. 148 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1739.— Bowe vs U. S. Reflector Co., 4 Browne C. P., 154. § 1740, § 1741.— Carpenter vs Lott, 31 Hun. 349. § 1742.- Allen vs Allen, 8 Abb. N. C, 175. il743. §1744. § 1745.— Amended laws 1882, ch. 401. 1746. 1747. §1'?48. i 1749. 1750. §1751. $1752. 1753. §1754. • §1755. § 1756.— Rarasden vs Ramsden, 2 McC. C. P., 408; id , 418; 91 N. Y., 381; 28 Hun, 885; 2 Browne C. P., 416. § 1757.— Streat vs Rothschild, 13 Abb. N. C, 883, 389. McCleai-y vs McCleary, 3l> Hun, 154. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE., 149- § 175§.— Farace vs Farace, 1 McC. C. P., 419. § 1759.— Field vs Field, 5 Browne C. P., 34. 1760. § 1761.— Peck vs Peck, 8 Abb. N. C, 400; 60 How., 206. In re Borrowdale, 38- Hun, 336. Moore vs Hegeman, 93 N. Y., 531. S 1762.— Ramsden vs Ramsden, 2 McC. C. P., 408; id., 418; 38 Hun, 285; 91 N. Y., 881; 2 Browne C. P., 416. Appleby vs Appleby, 3 McC. C. P., 433. DeMeli vs DeMeU, 5- Browne C. P., 806; 90 N. Y., 654. § 1763.— Ramsden vs Ramsden, 2 McC. C. P., 408: id., 418; 91 N. Y., 281; 28 Hun,. 285; 3 Browne C. P., 416. DeMeli vs DeMeli, 90 N. Y., 654. § 1764,— Corn well vs ComweU, 30 Hun, 573. § 1765.— Allardice vb Allardice, 11 Week. Dig., 191. § 1766.— Ramsden vs Ramsden, 91 N. Y., 281; 2 McC. C. P., 418; id., 408; 28 Hun, 285. Erkenbrack vs Erkenbrack, 5 Browne C. P., 184. 1767. S 1768.— Lee vs Lee, 66 How., 207; 4 Browne C. P., 331. ISO CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1769.— McQuien vs McQuien, 61 How., 280. Ramsden vs Ramsden, 38 Hun, 285; 2 McC. C. P., 408; id., 418; 91 N. Y., 381; 3 Browne C. P., 416. Winton vs WintoDi. Hun, 390. Louden vs Louden, 65 How., 411; 17 Week. Dig , 477. Ispacs vs Isaacs, Daly, 306; 61 How., 369. Ryckman vs Ryckman, 19 Week. Dig.' 43. Lee vs Lee, 66 How, .307; 4 Browne C. P., 821. § 1T70.— Amended 1881. Spahn vs Spahn, 13 Abb., N. C, 169. § 1771.— Erkenbrack vs Erkenbrack, 5 Browne C. P., 184. § 1772.— Isaacs vs Isaacs, 61 How., 369; 10 Daly, 806. McQuien vs McQuien, 61 How, 280. Ryer vs Ryer, 19 Week. Dig., 358. § 1773.— Strobridge vs Strobridge, 21 Hun, 388. McQuien vs McQuien, 61 How., 280. Isaacs vs Isaacs. 61 How., 369; 10 Daly, 306. Ryer vs Ryer, 19 Week. Dig., 858. Brisbane vs Brisbane, 5 Browne C. P., 353. 1774. § 1775 —Irving Nat Bank vs Corbett, 10 Abb. N. C , 85. Trustees Can. Academy vs McKechnie, 90 N. Y., 618. Gorton Steamer Co. vs Spofford, 5 Browne C. P., 116. § 1776. — C. S. & A. Association vs Read, 93 N. Y , 474: 9 Daly, 248, note. Bpngston vs Thingvalla Steamajiip Co., 31 Hun. 96; 2 McC. C. P., 441: 3 Browne C. P., 263; 4 id., 360; 18 Week. Dig., 411. § 1777. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 151 § 177§.— McKee vs Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 25 Hun. 583. Hutpon vs Morrisania Steamboat Co, 12 Abb. N. C, 278; 64 How., 268. N. Y. Life Ins. Co. vs Universal Life Ins. Co., 88 N. Y., 434; 14 Week. Dig., 149. Schlegel vs Am. B. & A. B. Co., 64 How., 196; 2 Browne C. P., 393. Bradley vs Albemarle Fertilizer Co., 3 Browne C. P., 50. Beaumond vs Diecks' Ph. Ext. Co., 5 Browne C. P., 374. 1779. § 1780.— Toronto Gen'l Trust Co. vs C, B. & Q. R. R. Co., 19 Week. Dig., 43; 32 Hun^ 190. Market Nat. Bank vs Pacific Nat. B'k, 64 How., 1. Hibernia Nat. B'k vs Mechanics', &c., B'k, 31 Hun, 166, 174; aff'd, 84 N. Y., 367. Pope vs Terre Haute Car and M'f'g Co., 24 Hun, 238; 87 N. Y., 137; 60 How., 419; 63 How., 137. Merchants' M'f'g Co. vs G. Trunk R'y Co., 11 Abb. N. C, 183. Erwin vs Oregon R. & Nav. Co,, 38 Hun, 269; 62 How, 490; 16 Week. Dig., 137. Brooks vs Mexican Construction Co., 49 Super. Ct., 234: 3 Browne C. P., 36; 17 Week. Dig., 438; 64 How., 364; 93 N. Y., 647. Plympton vs Bigelow, 13 Abb. N. C, 173; 93 N. Y., 592; 18 Week. Dig., 85. Pease vs Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co., l(y Daly, 459. Gorton Steamer Co. vs Spofford, 5 Browne C. P., 116. Leslie vs Lorillard. 18 Week. Dig., 388. Edwards vs Berkshire L. Ins. Co., 19 id., 423. § 178I.^Att'v Gen'l vs Atlantic Mut. Life Ins. Co., 11 Abb. N. C, 139 (note). Peo- ple vs Bruff, 60 How., 1; 9 Abb. N. C, 155. Paulsen vs Van Steenberg, 65 How., 343. Beecher vs Schieffelin, 4 Browne C. P., 231. _§ 1782.— People vs Bniff, 60 How., 1; W Abb. N. C, 155. Paulsen vs Van Steenberg, 65 How., 342. Beecher vs Schieffelin, 4 Browne C. P., 231. 152 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 17§3. § 17§4,— Att'y Gen'l vs Atlantic Mut. Life Ins. Co., 11 Abb. N. C, 139 (note). Bod^ bourn vs U. I. & E. R'y Co., 38 Hun, 369. Whitney vs N. Y. & A. E. R. Co., 66 How. 436; 5 Browne C. P., 118. §I7§5. ,§ 17§6.- — Amended 1880, ch. 801, P- 443. § 17§7. § 1788.— Amended la'9slis 1883, ch. 899. Smith vs Danzig. 3 Browne C. P., 137. Eddy vs Co-operative Dress Asso., 3 Browne C. P., 434; id., 443. KimbaU vs Ives, 30 Hun, 568. Whitney vs N. Y. & A. R. R. Co., 66 How., 436; 5 Browne C. P., 118. g 1789,— Smith vs Danzig, 3 Browne C. P., 137. 1790. §1791. § 1792. § 1793.— Eddy vs Co-operative Dress Asso., 3 Browne C. P., 443; id., 434. Whitney vs N. Y. & A. R. R. Co., 66 How., 436; 5 Browne C. P., 118. § 1794. g 1795.-Veeder vs Mudgett, 37 Uun, 519. § 1796. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. § 1797.— Att'y Gen'l vs Atlantic Mutual Life Ins. Co., 11 Abb. N. C., 139, n. People ex rel. Gould vs Mutual Union Tel. Co., 3 McC. C. P., 895. § J 79§.— People vs B., H. T. & W. Ry. Co., 27 Hun, 538; 15 Week. Dig , 328, People vs Cohocton Stone Road, 25 Hun, 13. § 1799.— People ex rel. Gould vs Mutual Union Tel. Co., 3 McC. C. P., 295. People vs B., H. T. & W. Ry. Co., 37 Hun, 538; 15 Week. Dig. 338. § 1800— Streat vs Rothschild, 13 Abb. N. C, 389. § 1801.— People vs Cohocton Stone Road, 35 Hun, 18. 1802. i 1803. 1804. § 1805.— Att'y Gen'l vs A. M. LiCe Ins. Co., 11 Abb. N. C, 139. § 1806.— Att'y Gen'l vs A. M. Life Ins. Co., 11 Abb. N. C, 139. Smith vs Danzig,. I Browne C. P., 137. Kingsley vs First National Bank, 31 Hun, 339. § 1807.— Attorney General vs N. A. L. Ins, Co., 93 N. Y., 387. Attorney General v& A. M. Life Ins. Co., 11 Abb. N. C, 139. § 1808.— People vs Bruff, 60 How., 1 ; 9 Abb. N. C. 155. 154 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §■§09. § I§IO.— Smith vs Danzig, 3 Browne C. P., 127 ; People vs Braff, 60 How., 1 : 9Abb! N. C, 155. Attrill vs Rookaway Beach Sup. Co.. 35 Hun, 509. ilSll. 1§12. § 1S13. § 1§14.— Wetmore vs Porter, 93 N. Y., 76. Silvernail vs Felts, 18 Week. Dig., 134. Gray vs Eyle, 5 Browne C. P., 387. gl815. 1§16. §1817. § 1818. S 1819.- — Drake vs Wilkie, 80 Hun, 587. § 1820. §1821. § 1822.— Amended 1883. § 1823.— Hibbard vs Dayton, 19 Week. Dig., 153. § 1824. § 1825.— Hanselt vs Gano, 1 Dem., 36. Cook vs Ryan, 39 Hun, 249. § 1826.— Cook vs Ryan, 39 Hun, 249. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURK. I 55 1827. , 1828. 1 1829. 1830. §1831. 1 1832.— Thome vs Underhill, 1 Dem., : § 1833.— Thorne vs UnderhUl, 1 Dem., 306. 1 1834.— Thorne vs Underhill, 1 Dem., 306. § 1835.— Daggett vs Mead, 11 Abb. N. C.s 116. Horton vs Brown, 29 Hun, 654: 17 Week. Dig., 142. Meltzer vs Doll, 91 N. Y., 365. Miller vs Miller, 19 Week Dig., 145; 32 Hun, 481. § 1836.— Daggett vs Mead, 11 Abb. N. C, 116. Horton vs Brown, 39 Hun, 654; 17 Week. Dig., 142. Meltzer vs Doll, 91 N. Y., 365. Chesbro vs Hicks, 66 How., 194. Miller vs Miller, 19 Week. Dig.. 145; 32 Hun, 481. § 1837. §1838. § 1839. § 1840. § 1841. § 1842. 156 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING- lU int. § 1§43. 1§44. § 1S4S. )18«6. § 1847. 1848. 1849. 18S0. § 1851. ^ 1852. § 185:i. g 1854. § 1855. § 1856. § 1857. §1858. >1859. § 1860. § 1861.— Younger vs Duffle, 94 N. Y., 535; 38 Hun, 342; 16 Week. Dig., 35; 5 Browne ■C. P., 84. Hatch vs Sigman, 1 Dem., 519. § 1862. §1863. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 57 g 1S64. § 1865.— MoNally vs Brown, 5 Eedf., 373. Early vs Early, 5 Eedf., 376. Hatch vs Sigman, 1 Dem., 519. Estate of CoUigan, 5 Browne C. P., 198. S 1 §66.— Tiers vs Tiers, 19 Week. Dig., 343. § 1867. § 1868. § 1869. § 1870. § 1871.— Bowe vs Arnold, 31 Hun, 356. Lichtenberg vs Herdtfelder, l^Week. Dig., 334^5 Browne C. P., 426. § 1872. I 1873. § 1874. ^ 1875. ^ 1876. § 1877. 1878. ^ 1879.— McEvoy vs Appleby, 27 Hun, 44; 15 Week. Dig., 233. 1880. 1881. IS8 CODE ANNOTATION'S REFERRING TO THE § 1882. 1883. § 1884. § 1885. § 1886.— People ex rel. Nash vs Faulkner, 31 Hun, 317. § 1887. 1888. 1889. 1890. 1891. il892. § 1893. 1894. 1895. 1896. § 1897.— United States vs Rose, 2 McC. C. P., 264. Mayor, &c., vs Eisler, 2 Browne C. P., 125; 14 Week. Dig., 862; 10 Daly, 396. Kee vs McSveeeney, 66 How., 447. §1898. § 1899. § 1900. §1901. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 59 § 1902.— Hegerich vs Keddie, 32 Hun. 141; 5 Browne C. P., 338. Londriggan vs N. y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 49 Super. Ct., 526: 13 Abb. N. C, 373; 5 Browne C. P., 76. Stuebing vs Marshall. 2 Browne C. P.. 77. §1903. §1904. §1905. §190« § 1907. § 1908. § 1909.— Carpenter vs Butler, 29 Hun, 351; 16 Week. Dig., 507. Newberger vs Mau- neck Mfg. Co., 10 Daly, 275. § 1910. §1J911. 1912.— Carpenter vs Butler, 29 Hun. 351. § 1913.- Carpenter vs Butler, 29 Hvm, 251; 16 Week. Dig., 507. Baldwin vs Roberts. 30 Hun, 163. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. vs Friselle, 23 Hun, 174; 10 Week. Dig., 446, , 1914. § 1915.— Jw re Stockbridge, 10 Daly, 33. § 1916. § 1917. l6o CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 191S. § 1919.— Flagg vs Swift, Z^. Hun, 633. Hathaway' vs Am. Mining Stock Exch., 31 Hun, 575; 18 Week. Dig., 338. Duncan vs Jones, 33 Hun, 12. Wayne Co. Savings Bank vs Brackett, 31 Hun, 434. Poultney vs Bacliman, 63 How., 466; 10 Abb. N. C, 253. Win- ter vs Hamm, 5 Browne C. P., 194. Van Arnam vs MoCune, 19 Week Dig., 412. § 1920. 1921. § 1922. ; 1923. 1924. § 1925.— Hill vs PeekskiU Savings Bank, 26 Hun. 161. Sherman vs Trastees of Clif- ton Springs, 27 Hun, 390. Bird vs Mayor &c., 19 Week. Dig., 571. § 1926. — Farnham vs Benedict, 89 Hun, 44. Bridges vs Supervisors of SulUvan Co., 92 N. Y., 570. Surdam vs Fuller, 31 Hun, 500, 512. § 1927.- -Surdam vs Fuller, 31 Hun, 500, 513. § 1928. §1929. § 1930.— Farnham vs Benedict, 39 Hun. 44; 16 Week. Dig., 170. Hitchman vs Bax- ter, 5 Browne C. P., 336. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. l6l ^- ~ — g 1931.— People ex rel. Everett vs Supervisors of Ulster Co., 39 Hun, 185; 93 N. Y., 397. Hitchman vs Baxter, 5 Browne C. P., 226. g 1932.— Orvis vs Lambeau, 2 McC. C. P , 350. Whltmore vs James, 10 Daly, 490. i; 1933.- Richardson vs Case, 3 Browne C. P., 295. Whittaan vs James, 10 Daly, 490. § 1934.— Whitman vs James, 10 Daly, 490. 1935.— Whitman vs James, 10 Daly, 490. § 1936.— Famham vs Benedict, 29 Hun, 44; 16 Week. Dig., 170. Whitman vs James, 10 Daly, 490. § 1937.- Morey vs Tracey, 93 N. Y., 381; 17 Week. Dig., 146. Maples vs Mackey, 89 2J. Y., 147 (note); 10 Week. Dig., 423; 32 Hun, 328. § 1938. § 1939.- -Richardson vs Case, 3 Browne C. Pv ,395. § 1940. § 1941. § 1942.— Honegger vs Wettstein, 47 Super. Ct., 135. ; 1943. §1944. § 1945. 8 1946.— Decker vs Kitchen, 2 Browne C. P., 111. 1 62 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 1947.— Alford vs Berkele, 39 Hun, 633. § 1948.— Morris vs Whelan, 11 Abb. N. C, 64; 64 How., 109. People vs B., H. T. W. R. R. Co., 37 Hun, 538; 15 Week. Dig., 338. People vs Gunn, 30 Hun, 333. § 1949. 1950.— Streat vs Rothschild, 13 Abb. N. C, 389. §1951. >1952. § 1953.— Amended 1884, ch, 399, p. 481. People ex rel. Swinburne vs Nolan 30 Uun^ 484; 65 How., 468. 1954. ; 1955. § 1956.— People ex rel. Swinburne vs Nolan, 30 Hun, 484; 65 How., 468. 1957. § 1958.— Streat vs Rothschild, 13 Abb. N. C, 389. § 1959. § 1960. § 1961. § 1962.— United States vs Rose, 3 McC. C. P., 364. § 1963. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 163 § 1964.— United States vs Rose, 3 McC. C. P., 364. §1965. § 1966. § 1967. S 1968. , 1969. 1 1970. il971. 1 1972. 1 1973. \ 1974. 1975. 1976. 1977. § 1978. § 1979. 1980. \ 1981. 1 1982. § 1983.— The People ex rel. Hatzel vs HaU, 80 N. Y., 117. 11984. i 1985. 164 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 19§6.— People ex rel. Gould vs Mutual Union Tel. Co., 2 McC. C. P., 395. § 19§7.— People vs Cohocton Stone Road, 25 Hun, 13. Chapter xvi., Title ii., Article iv. People ex rel. Cavanaugh vs McAdam, 2 McC. C. P., 325. People vs N. Y., L. E. & W. R R. Co., 2 McC. C. P., 345. 19§§. ;i989. § 1990. I 1991. — People ex rel. Byrne vs French, 3 Browne C P., 180. In re Leary, 30 Hun, 394. § 1992. § 1993.— People vs N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 2 McC. C. P., 345; 8 Browne C. P., 345; 3 Browne C. P., 11; 38 Hun, 543. § 1994. § 1995. § 1996. § 1997. § 1998. §1999. §2000. §2001. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 165 §2002. §3003. §2004. / §2005. §2006. § 2007.— Ire re Leary, 30 Hun, 394. ' §200S. §2009. § 2010. § 2011.— Amended laws 1880, ch. 301, p. 443. § 2012. § 2013. § 2014. § 2015. § 2016. § 2017.— People ex rel. Clark ys Clark, 64 How., 7. § 201§. § 2019. § 2020. §2021. , 2022. l66 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2023. , 2024. i 2025. § 2026. § 2027. § 202S. §2020. § 2030. §2031.- -People ex rel. Fries vs i Riley, 35 Hun, 587. § 2032.- -People vs Lincoln, 25 Hun, 306. In re Dixon, 11 Abb. N. c. , 118. § 2033.— People ex rel. Utley vs Seaton, 25 Hun, 305. People vs Lincoln, 35 Hun, 306. People ex rel. Fries vs Riley, 35 Hun, 587. § 2034.— People vs Lincoln, 25 Hun, 306. People ex rel. Fries vs Riley, 25 Hun, 587. § 2035. § 2036. § 2037. § 203§. g 2039. §2040. §2041. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 67 § 2042. § 2043. § 2044. § 2045.— People ex rel. Sherwin vs Mead, 64 How., 353. § 2046.— People ex rel. Sherwin vs Mead, 64 How., 252. § 2047. j 204§. : 2049. 2030. I 2031. i 2032. , 2033. t 2034. ! 2053. I 2056. I 2057. § 3058.— 7n re Larson, 19 Week. Dig., 364. I 2039. ; 2060. § 2061. — People ex rel. Sherwin vs Mead, 64 How., 258. § 2062.— People ex rel. Sherwin vs Mead, 64 How., 252. 1 68 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE • §2063. § 2064, §2065. 1 2066.— In re Raney, 66 How., 291. § 2067.— People vs N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 11; 3 id., 83. Peo- ple ex rel. Sanderson vs Board of Canvassers, 3 Browne C. P., 453. People ex rel. Cavan- ;igh vs McAdam, 3 Browne C. P., 396. § 2068.— Isaacs vs Isaacs, 10 Daly, 396; 61 How., 369. t; 2069. § 2070.— People vs N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 11; 3 id., 83. You- mans vs Terry, 19 Week. Dig. , 869. * § 207I. I 2072. i 2073. I 2074. , 2073. § 2076. i 2077. I 2078. § 2079. — People ex rel. Hartford Life and Annuity Ins. Co. vs Fairman, 12 Abb. N. C, 352. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 169 § 2080. § 2081. § 2082.— People ex rel. Hartford Life and Annuity Ins. Co. vs Fairman, 13 Abb. N. C.,252. § 2083.— People ex rel. Parmenter vs Wadsworth, 61 How., 57. g 2084. S 2085. § 2086.— People ex rel. Everett vs Supervisors of Ulster County, 39 Hun, 185; 93 N- Y., 397. g 2087.— People ex rel.. Schlehr vs Common Council of Buffalo, 30 Hun, 636. > 2088. i 2089. i 2090. g 2091.— People ex rel. Browne vs McAdam, 2 McCarty C. P., 86; 3 Browne C. P , 52. People ex rel. Cook vs Parker, 1 McC. C. P., 444; 63 How., 3. i2092. § 2093.- Salke vs Talcoj^, 10 Week. Dig.. 394. §2094. §2095. §2090. 170 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 209T,— Salke vs Talcott, 10 Week. Dig., 394. ;2098. § 2099. § 2100.— People exe rel. Gould vs CommisBioners of Excise, 61 How., 514; 1 McC. C. P., 344. People ex rel. Adams vs Westbrook, 3 Browne C. P., 180. §2101. g 2102. § 2103. § 2104. 2105. §2106. § 2107. § 2108. §2109. §2110. § 2111.— Amended Laws 1880, ch. 301, p. 443. § 2112. § 2113. g 2114. § 2115. g 2116. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I/I ) 2117,— Fiester vs Shepard, 92 N. Y., 251. § 2118.— Fiester vs Shepard, 93 N. Y., 351. ,2119. § 2120 —People ex rel. Schlosser vs Porter, 25 Hun, 601. People e.v rel. Gilmore vs Donohue, 10 Week. Dig., 427. ; 2121. § 2122. — People ex rel. Benedict vs Dennison, 28 Hun, 328. People e.x rel. Nichols vs Cooper, 21 Hun, 517, 527. People ex rel. Hart vs Fire Commissioners, 11 Week. Dig., 38. Pontius vs People, 11 Week. Dig., U4. \ 2123. , 2124. § 2125.— People ex rel. Smith vs Cooper, Mayor. &c., 22 Hun, 515; 11 Week Dig., 162. People ex rel. Stevens vs Police Commissioners, 24 Hun, 284. People e.r rel. Waldman vs Police Commissioners. 11 Week. Dig., 108. § 2126.— People ex rel. Smith vs Mayor, &o., 22 Hun, 515. § 2127. § 2128.— People ex rel. Ulster & Delaware R. R. Co. vs Smith, i4 Hun, 66. § 2129.— People ex rel. U. & D. R. R. Co. vs Burhans. 25 Hun, 186. In re Leary, 30 Hun, 394. 172 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2130, § 2131.— People ex rel. N. Y. Elevated R. E. Co. vs Aldermen of N. Y., 10 Abb. N. C, 33. People ex rel. Burhans vs Supervisors of Ulster Co., 19 Week. Dig., 208. § 2132. ;2133. I 2134. 2135. ;2136. , 2137. § 2138.— People ex rel. McCarthy vs French, 25 Hun, 111: S. C, 10 Abb. N. C, 418; 13 Week. Dig., 490. People ex rel. U. & D. R. R. Co. vs Smith, 24 Hun, 66. People ex rel. Nichols V8 Cooper, 21 Hun, 517, 527. § 2139. § 2140.- -People ex rel. Mizner vs Hair, 29 Hun, 125; 16 Week. Dig., 136. People ex rel. Drevet vs Fire Commissioners. 30 Hun, 376. People ex rel. Murphy vs French, 92 N. Y., 306. People ex rel. Fitzsimons vs Jourdan, 1 MeC. C. P., 328. People ex rel. U. & D. R. R. Co. vs Smith, 24 Hun,' 66. People ex rel. Schlosser vs Porter, 25 Hun, 603. § 2141.— People ex rel. Schlosser vs Porter, 25 Hun, 603. ^ 2142. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 173 ,§ 2143. — People ex rel. Banner vs Temple, 37 Hun, 138. People ex rel Wolford vs StrAvell, 37 Hun, 318. People ex rel. Peck vs Canal Board, 89 Hun, 159. g 2144.— People ex rel. Gilmore vs Donphue, 33 Hun, 470. §2145. § 2146. §2147. § 214§.— People ex rel. Sohlosser vs Porter, 35 Hun, 603. § 2149. §2150. §2151. § 2152. § 2153. § 2154. § 2155. § 2156. ^2157, § 215§. § 2159. §2160. § 2161. ^ 2162. 174 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2163. i 3164. i; 2165. , 2166. i 2167. ; 2168. I 2169. I 2170. §2171, § 2172. § 2173. i 2174. !2175. i 2176. § 2177. §2178. § 2179. §2180. §2181.- -Mahon vs Mahon, 19 Week. Dig. ,346. § 2182.- -Amended laws 1883, ch. 403 , p. 574. § 2183.— Mahon vs Mahon. 19 Week. Dig., 346. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 75 2184. ^2188. 52189. > 2190. §2191. ; 2192. § 2193. j 2194. 1 2193. ) 2196. I 2197. ; 2198. ; 2199. §2200. § 2201. § 2202. § 2203.— Jn re Chappell, 23 Hun, 179. §2204. § 2205. 176 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE I 2206. §2207. § 2208. § 2209,— Searing vs 'Goodstein, 3 Browne C. P., 464. § 2210. §2211. § 2212. § 2213. m % 2214. § 2215. §2216. § 2217. § 221§. §2219. §2220.. §2221. " % 2222. § 2223. § 2224. § 2225. « g 2226. § 2227. \ CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. vn \^ § 2228. ■ \ \§ 2229. 5 2230. §2231.— Bultman vs Kindelon, 2 McCarty C. P., 47. Shaw vs McCarty, 3 McCarty C. P., 49; 59 How., 4y7. Penoyer vs Browne, 3 McCarty C. P., 61. People ex rel. Browne- vs McAdam, 3 McCarty, 86. Shaw vs McCarty, 3 McC. C. P., 335; 2 Browne C. P., 23. Jones vs Demeady, 3 McC. C. P., 346. Horton vs N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 13 Abb. N. C.,38tiote). 1 2232— /n re White, 13 Abb. N. C, 348. § 2233.— Koster vs Van Schaick, 2 McC. C. P., 238. " Van Schaick vs Koster, 3 McC- C. P., 389. Kelly vs Sheehy, 60 How., 439. I 2234. Amended 1881 and 1884, chap. 405, p. 485. People eJ' rel. Cavanaugh vs. McAdam, 38 Hun, 284; 2 McC. C. P., 325; 64 How., 338; 16 Week. Dig., 36. KeUy vs Sheehy, 60 How., 439. § 2235.— People ec rel. Cavanaugh vs McAdam, 28 Hun, 284; 64 How., 238; 16 Week. Dig., 86. Kelly vs Sheehy, 60 How., 439. Chad wick vs Spargur, 1 McC. C. P., 433. § 2236.— People ex rel. Cavanaugh vs McAdam, 38 Hun, 384; 64 How., 338. § 2237.— People ex rel. Cavanaugh vs McAdam, 38 Hun, 384; 64 How., 238. 178 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 22S§.— People exrel. Cavanaugh vs McAdam, 28 Hun, 284; 2 McC. C. P., 335; 64 How., 238; 16 Week. Dig., 36; 3 Browne C. P., 396. Luhrs vs Commors, 30 Hun, 468; 13 Abb. N. C, 88. § 2239. § 2240. ,2241. S 2242. ; 2243. g 2244.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 399. Yuelin vs Meade, 1 McC. C. P., 446. § 2245.— Kelly vs Sheehy, 60 How., 439. § 2246. § 2247.— Amended 1881 and 1883, ch. 114, p. 141. In re White, 12 Abb. N. C. 348 Kelly vs Sheehy, 60 How., 439. i 224§.— Hasler vs Johnston, 59 How., 433. § 2249.— Elverson vs Vanderpool, 41 N. Y., Super. Ct., 2.')7. N. Y. Life Ins. Co. vs Waldron, 9 Daly, 472; S. C. 11 Weekly Dig., 245. § 2260.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 399. N. Y. Mutug,! Life Ins. Co. vs WaWron, 11 Weekly Dig., 345; 9 Daly, 473. Hasler vs Johnston, 59 How., 433. Lewis vs Hoffman, 5 Browne C. P., 141. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 79 § aaSI.— Laws of 1882, ch. 399. ; 2252. 1 2253. § 3254.— Koster vs Van Schaick. 2 McO. C. P , 228; 64 How., 100; 2 Browne C. P., 386. I 2255. 2256. I 2257. i 225§. ^2259. § 2260.— Jessurun vs Maokie, 24 Hun, 624; 61 How., 261. Warner vs Henderson, 25 Hun, 303; 13 Week. Dig., 143. Shaw vs McCarty, 2 MoCarty C. P., 49; 59 How., 487; 2 McC. C. P., 335; 63 How., 286; 3 Browne C. P., 28. Broadwell vs Holcomb, 4 Browne G. P., 159; 65 How., 502. § 2261.— Knox vs McDonald, 25 Hun, 368. Shaw vs McCarty, 2 McCarty C. P., 49; 59 How., 487; 2 Browne C. P., 23; i McC. C. P., 235; 63 How., 286. Van Schaick vs Kos- ter, 2 McC. C. P., 239. Schenck vs Prame. 68 How., 165. Lewis vs Hoffman. 5 Browne C. P., 141. § 2262.— Knox vs McDonald, 25 Hun, 268. Shaw vs McCarty, 2 McCarty C. P., 235. Koster vs Van Schaick, 2 McCarty C. P., 328; 64 How., 100; 2 Browne C. P., 336. Van Schaick vs Koster, 2 McC. C. P.. 289. Schenck vs Prame, 68 How., 165. Broadwell vs Holcomb, 65 How., 502; 4 Browne C. P., 159. l8o CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2263.— Knox vs McDonald, 35 Hun, 268. Broadwell vs Holcomb, 65 How., 502; 4 Browne C. P., 159. § 2264.— Knox vs McDonald, 25 Hun, 268. § 2265.— Chadwick vs Spargur 1 McC. C. P., 422. Jessurun vs Mackie, 24 Hun, 624; 61 How., 261. Knox vs McDonald, 35 Hun, 268. Koster vs Van Sohaick, 3 McC. C. P., 338; 64 How., 100; 3 Browne C. P., 336. Van Schaick vs Koster, 3 McC. C. P., 239. Shaw vs McCarty, 3 McC' C. P., 335. Cassell vs Fisk. 3 McC. C. P., 341. In re White, 13 Abb. N. C, 348. Schenck vs Prame, 63 How., 165. People ex rel. Cook vs Parker, 68 How., 3; 1 McC. C. P., 443. Broadwell vs Holcomb, 65 How., 502; 4 Browne C. P., 159. § 2266.— People ex rel. Fries vs Riley, 25 Hun, 587. Wilson vs Greig, 12 Week. Dig., 73. Walker vs Walker, 10 Week. Dig., 563. Ryckman vs Ryckman, 19 Week. Dig., 41. § 2267. § 226S.— Isaacs vs Isaacs 61 How., 369. Ryckman vs Ryckman, 19 Week. Dig. 41. § 2269. -Naylor vs Naylor, 32 Hun, 228. Isaacs vs Isaacs, 61 How., 369. Rinelander vs Dunham, 2 Browne C. P., 32. § 2270. § 2271. § 2272.- — Naylor vs Naylor, 32 Hun, 228; 19 Week. Dig., , 79. g 2273. 5 2274. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. l8l g 2875. § 2276. § 4277. i227§. 8 3279. i 22§0. g 2281.— In. re H , an attorney, 87 N. Y., 521. Brisbane vs Brisbane, 5 Browne C. P., 353. Mahon vs Mahon, 5 Browne C. P., 58. § 2282.- -Mahon vs Mahon, 5 Browne C • P., 58. § 2283.- -In re H- , an att'y, 87 N. Y. , 531 . Mahon vs Mahon, 5 Browne C. P., , 58. § 2284. - § 2285.- — Egan vs Lynch, 49 Super. Ot., 454; 3 Browne C. P. , 336. g 2286.-' -In re Steinert, 29 Hun, 301, Ryer vs Ryer, 19 Weelt. Dig., , 358. § 2287.- —Egan vs Lynch, 49 Super. Ct., 454; 3 Browne C. P.. 236. § 2288. g 2289. I 2290. §2291. § 2292.— Wilson vs Greig, 12 Week. Dig., 73. I 2293. 1 82 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE , § 2294. § 2295. § 2296. § 2297. §2298. § 2299. § 2300. \ §2301. § 2302. § 2303. §2304. §230S. § 2306. §2307. §2308. " §2309. § 2310. §2311. § 2312. §2313. ^ §2314. - ----- - --- - § 2315. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 183 i 2316. ;!2317. § 3318. 12319. § 2320— In re Rodgers, 9 Abb. N. C, 141. In re Laurent, 11 Abb. N. C, 120. In re Demelt, 37 Hun, 480. g 2321 . g 2322.- -In re Beckwith, 87 N. Y., .503. g 2323.- -In re Laurent , 11 Abb. N. C, 120. In re 1 Church , 64 How., , 393. § 2324. § 2325.- -In re Demelt, 27 Hun, 480; 15 Week. Dig. , 337. In re Church. 64 How. ,393. § 2326. S 2327.- -In re Church, 64 How. , 393. § 2328.- -In re Church, 64 How. , 393. g 2329, § 2330. g 2331. g 2332. g 2333. § 2334. 1 84 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2335. —In re Demelt, 37 Hun, 480. § 2336. —Lorenzo vs Deery, 36 Hun, 447. §2337. § 233§. § 2339.- -In re Beckwith, 87 N. Y., 503. § 2340. I 2341. § 2342. § 2349. § 23SO. §2351 § 2352. § 2353. § 2354. § 2355. § 2343. § 2344.- -Schultz vs Cookingham, , 30 Hun, 448. § 2345. § 2346 - -Amended laws 1882, ch 399. § 2347. § 234S. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 185 S 2356. ; 2357. §2359. § 2360.— 7w re Mathews, 27 Hun, 254. § 2361. > 2362. § 2363. § 2364. § 2365.— Cutter vs Gutter, 48 N. Y., Super. Ct., 470. 8 2366.— Lorenzo vs Deery, 26 Hun, 447. Cutter vs Cutter, 48 N. Y. ; Super. Ct., 470. McNulty vs SoU^y, 95 N. Y., 242; 31 Hun, 17; 66 How., 147; 4 Browne C. P., 250; 17 Week. Dig., 568. Halstead vs Seaman, 10 Week. Dig., 539. § 2367. § 2368.— Wiberly vs Mathews, 11 Week. Dig., 471. j 2369.- Cutter vs Cutter, 48 N. Y., Super. Ct., 470. Kelsey vs Darrow, 22 Hun, 125. § 2370. § 2371.— Lorenzo vs Deery, 26 Hun, 447. In re Poole, 5 Browne C. P., 279; 19 Week. Dig., 43. § 2372. 1 86 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2373. § 2374.— Nat. Bank of Republic vs Darragh, 30 Hun, 29. Halstead vs Seaman, 10 Week. Dig., 539. Pool vs Johnston, 19 Week. Dig., 43; 5 Browne C. P., 379. § 2375.— Pool vs Johnston, 19 Week. Dig., 43; 5 Browne C. P., 279. 8 2376. § 2377. I 2378. I 2379. § 2380. § 2381.— Pool vs Johnston, 19 Week. Dig., 43; 5 Browne C. P., 379. , 2382. i 23S3. § 2384. § 2385. § 2386.— Lorenzo vs Deery, 36 Hun, 447. § 2387. § 2388.— MoKenzie vs Alster, 13 Abb. N. C, 110. § 2389. § 2390. §2391. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 87 ^2392. i 2393. \ 2394. I 2395. i 2396. §2397. -Amended laws 1883, ch. ; § 239§. ) 2399. § 2400. § 2401. ; 2402. § 2403. ; 2404. § 2405. § 2406. ! 2407. § 2408. § 2409.— Amended laws 1882, oh. 399. » § 2410. § 2411. 2412. ) 2413 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING. TO THE , 2414. \ 2415. I 2416. i 2417. § 2418. § 24,19.— In re Pyrolusite Manganese Co., 29 Hun, 439; 3 Browne C. P., 270. Jewett vs Swan, 19 Week. Dig., 144. §2420.- -In re Pyrolusite Manganese Co., 39 Hun, 439; 3 Browne C. P., 270. § 2421.- -In re Pyrolusite Manganese Co. , , 29 Hun, 429; 3 Browne C. P-, , 270. 2422. § 2423.- —In re Pyrolusite Manganese Co. , 29 Hun, 439; 3 Browne C. P. ,370. § 2424.- -In re Pyrolusite Manganese Co., , 29 Hun, 429; 3 Browne C. P.; ,270. § 2425.- -In re Pyrolusite Manganese Co., 39 Hun, 429; 3 Browne C. Pv ,370. § 2426- -In re Pyrolusite Manganese Co., , 29 Hun, 429; a Browne C. P., ,270. § 2427. § 2428. § 2429. § 2430. § 2431.— Amended 1884, oh. 406, p. 485. Jewett vs Swan, 19 Week. Dig., 144. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1 89 § 2432.— Felt vs Dorr, 29 Hun, 14; 16 Week. Dig., 385. Baldwin ts Perry, 1 McC. C. P., 118; id., 32; 25 Hun, 72; 61 How., 289; 12 Week. Dig., 398. Merchant vs Sessions, 5 Browne C. P., 24. g 243S.— Fiske vs Twigg, 5 Browne C. P., 41. § 2434. -Amended 1884, ch. 407, p. 486. Baldwin vs Perry, 25 Hun, 72: S. C, 61 How., 289; 12 Week Dig., 898; 24 Alb. L. J., 54; 1 McC. C. P., 118; id , 32. § 2435. - Cromwell vs Spofiford, 4 Browne C. P., 273. § 2436.— Manken vs Pape, 65 How , 453. i 2437.— Netzel vs Mulford, 59 How., 452. \ 2438. 12439. ) 2440. § 2441.— Davis vs Herrig, 65 How., 290. i 2442. § 2443. i 2444.— Wright vs Cabot, 47 Super. Ct., 229. Fiske vs Twigg, 5 Browne C. P., 41. 2445. 2446.— Albright vs Kempton, 4 Browne C. P , 16. I go CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2447.— Hancock vs Sears, 93 N. Y., 79; 4 Browae C. P., 355. MoUer vs Wells, 29 Hun, 587; 17 Week. Dig., 96. Miller vs Lyons, 17 Week. Dig., 86. § 244§. § 2449. 2450. § 2451.— Hancock vs Sears, 39 Hun, 96; 98 N. Y., 79; 4 Browne C. P., 355. i 2452. § 2453. ) 2454. § 2455.— Valiente vs Bryan, 3 Browne C. P., 358. Hancock vs Sears, 93 N. Y., 79. Baucus vs Stover, 89 N. Y., 1. § 2456.— Hancock vs Sears, 93 N. Y., 79. In re Leffingwell, 80 Hun, 528. § 2457.— Perkins vs Kendall, 3 Browne C. P., 340. Tinker vs Crook, 23 Hun, 579. § 2458.— Amended 1881. Bean vs Tonnelle, 34 Hun, 358; 1 McC. C. P., 33. Perkins vs Kendall, 3 Browne C. P., 240. Brown vs Gump, 59 How., 507. Davis vs Herrig, 65 How., 290, § 2459. § 2460.— Amended 1881. Dusenbury vs Dusenbury, 48 N. Y. Super. Ct . 305; How., 349. Baker vs McLoughlin, 19 Week. Dig.. 29. CODE OF Civil, PROCEDURE. I91 ;2461. S2462. § 2463.— Hancock vs Sears, 93 N. Y., 79; 4 Browne C. P., 355; 29 Hun, 96. McEvoy TS Appleby, 27 Hun, 44. Keiher vs Shipherd, 4 Browne C. P., 374. § 2464.— Morgan vs Van Kohnstamm, 9 Daly, 355; S. C, 60 How., 161. Goddard vs Stiles, 90 N. Y., 199. Keiher vs Shipherd, 4 Browne C. P., 374. Hancock vs Sears, 93 N. Y., 79; 4 Browne C. P., 355. § 2465.— Goddard vs Stiles, 90 N. Y., 199. Ashley vs Turner. 10 Week. Dig., 444. § 2466. -Goddard vs Stiles, 90 N. Y., J 99. State Bank of Syracuse vs Gill, 23 Hun, 410. § 2467.— Wright vs Nostrand, 47 Super. Ct., 441. § 2468.-Payne vs Becker, 87 N. Y., 153. Clark vs Gilbert, 10 Daly, 316. § 2469.— Pustet vs Flannelly, 60 How,, 67. Clark vs Gilbert, 10 Daly. 316. I 2470. § 2471. — Galster vs Syracuse Savings Bank, 29 Hun, 594. Chapter xviii.— Waldo vs Waldo, 19 Week. Dig., 100; 32 Hun, 351. § 2472.— Riggs vs Cragg, 89 N. Y., 479. In re Harstrom, 7 Abb. N. C, 391. Thomp- son vs Mott, 5 Redf., 574; 1 Dem., 32; In re Verplanck, 91 N. Y., 439. Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf., 586. Colyer vs Colyer, 4 Redf., 305. Guion vs Uuderhill, 1 Dem., 303. Cromwell vs Kirk, 1 Dem., 599. Young 'vs Hicks, 16 Week. Dig., 570; 92 N. Y., 235. Estate of Duffy, 3 Browne C. P., 229. Brittin vs Phillips, 1 Dem., 57. 192 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2473.— /m re Vei-planck, 91 N. Y., 439. Estate of Tilden, 5 Browne C. P., 449. § 2474.— Heilman vs Jones, 5 Redf., 398. § 2475. - Heilman vs Jones, 5 Redf., ; § 2476.— Oyiedo vs Duffie, 5 Redf., 137. Estate of Duffy, 3 Browne C. P., 329; 1 Dam., S03. In re Langbein, 1 Dem., 448. g 2477. § a47§. § 2479.- -Amended 1883, oh. 56, P- 4S. § 2480. § 2481.— Estate of Spreen, 1 MoC. C. P., 375. Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf., 586. Heilman vs Jones, 5 Redf., 398 In re Hancock, 37 Hun, 78. Becker vs Bochus, 5 Redf., 488. In re Becker, 38 Hun, 307. Thompkins vs Moseman, 5 Redf., 403. In re Halsey, 13 Abb. N. C, 353. In re Verplanck, 91 N. Y., 489. In re Grossman's wiE, 3 McC- C. P., 394. Guion vs Underbill, 1 Dem., 303. Pryer vs Clapp, 1 Dem., 387. Melcher vs Stevens, 1 Dem., 133. § 2482. § 2483. § 2484.- -People ex rel. Oakley vs Petty, 33 Hun, ,443. 1 2485.- -People ex rel. Oakley vs Petty, 33 Hun, 443. Gillies vs Kreuder, IDem ,349. S 2486.— Amended 1881. In re Meeker, 9 Daly, 556. In re Chauncey, 33 Hun, 439! 19 Week. Dig., 457. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I93 § 2487. !^24§8. § 2489. § 2490.— In re Chauncey, 19 Week. Dig., 457; 33 Hun, 489. I 2491. §2492. ^ 2493. § 2494.— Jn re Chauncey, 19 Week. Dig., 457; 32 Hun, 429. § 2495. § 2496.^PeopIe ex rel. Kirk vs Weiant, 30 Hun, 475. i 2497. .§ 2498. § 2499. § 2500. §2501. § 2502. § 2503. g 2504. § 2505.— Amended 1881. §2506^ S 2507. 194 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 250§. g 2509. > 2510. I 2511. i25l2. §2513 §2514.-McKeown vs Pagan, 4 Redf., 330. Estate of Barnes, 1 McC. C. P., 59. Baylis vs Swartwout, 4 Eedf., 395. In re Clark, 5 Eedf., 466. . In re Roosevelt, 5 Redf., 601. In re Miles, 5 Eedf., 110. Estate of Brown, 3 MoC. C. P., 374; 3 Browne C. P., 39. Estate of Bemey, 2 McC. C. P., 455; 3 Browne C. P., 132. Stapler vs Hoffman, 1 Dem., 63. Hurlburt vs Durant, 3 Browne C. P., 115. In re Jackson, 5 Browne C. P., 43B: 33 Hun, 300; 19 Week. Dig., 270. §2515. § 2516.— Estate of Spreen, 1 McC. C. P., 875. § 2517.— Pryer vs Clapp, 1 Dem., 387. § 251§.— Estate of Thompson, 1 McC. C. P., 364. § 2519. § 2520.-B<)erum vs Betts, 1 Dem., 471. • § 2521.— Jn re Macauley, 94 N. Y., 574. § 2522.— Amended 1881. In re Macauley, 94 N. Y., 574. § 2523. CODE OF CIVIL. PROCEDURE. 195 § 2524.— Amended 1881. § 2525. —Amended laws 1882, oh. 399. In re Maoauley, 94 N. Y., 574. § 2526. § 2527. -Estate of Hewitt, 4 Browne C. P., 57; 65 How., 187. § 2528. -In re Halsey, 13 Abb. N C, 353. Estate of Barnes. 1 McC. 0. P., 59. § 2529. § 253©.- —In re Ludlow, 5 Redf., 891. §2531.- —In re Ludlow, 5 Redf., 391. § 2532. § 2533. § 2534.- -In re Macauley, 94 N. Y., 574. In re King, 3 McCarty C. P., 71. § 2535. § 2536. -In re Macauley, 94 N. Y., 574. § 2537.— Amended laws 1883, oh. 399. Zahrts Estate. 11 Abb. N. C, 235; afE'd 94 N. Y., 605; lDem.,444. § 253§.— Dale vs Stokes, 5 Redf., 586. Gillies vs Kreuder, 1 Dem.. 349. In re Halsey, 13 Abb , N. C, 353. ) 2539. § 2540.— Amended 1881. 196 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2341. § 2342.- -Amended 1881. § 2543. § 2544. § 2545.— Hartwell vs McMaster, 4 Redf., 389. Snyder vs Sherman, 88 N. Y., 656. In re Probate will of Smith, 19 Week Dig , 3i0; S. C, 95 N. Y., 517. In re Probate will of Ross, 87 N. Y., 514. In re Chauncey, 33 Hun, 439; 19 Week. Dig., 457. Waldo ts Waldo, 33 Hun, 351; 19 Week Dig., 100. Baucus vs Stover. 89 N. Y., 1. Mills vs Hoff. man, 93 N. Y.. 181. § 2546.— Amended 1881. In re Leffingwell, 30 Hun, 538. I 2347. § 2548. § 2549. § 2550. -Cole vs Terpenning, 37 Hun, 111. § 2551. § 2552.— Gillies vs Kreuder, 1 Dem., 349. ) 2553.— Disosway vs Howard, 1 Dem., 175; 91 N. Y., 335; 16 Week. Dig., 150. § 2554.— 7m re Dissosway, 91 N. Y., 335; 1 Dem., 175; 16 Week. Dig., 150. Bingham: vs Burlingame, 19 Week. Dig., 447. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I97 § 2555.— Underbill vs Nichols, 4 Eedf., 318. Woodhouse vs Woodhouse, 5 Redf , 131. Joel TS Ritterman, 5 Redf., 186 In re Dissosway, 91 N. Y., 335; 16 Week. Dig., 1.50. In re Killinger, 3 McCarty, C. P., 68. Ferguson vs Cummings, 1 Dem., 433. § 2556.— Estate of Stokes, 3 Browne 0. P., 384; 1 Dem., 360. Iv re Hewitt. 65 How.. 187. § 2557.-/71 re Mace, 4 Redf., 335. Chalker vs Chalker, 5 Redf. . 480. In re Sexton, 2 McCarty C; P., 94; 1 Dem., 3. In re Hewitt, 65 How., 187; 4 Browne C. P., .57; 1 Dem., 249. § 2558.— Amended 1881. In re Miles, 5 Redf., 110. McCue vs O'Hara, 5 Redf., 336 Forster vs Kane, 1 Dem., 67. Bertine vs Hubbell, 1 Dem., 335. Whelpley vs Loder, 1 Dem., 368. In re Hewitt, 65 How., 187; 4 Browne C. P., 57; 1 Dem., 349. § 2559. j 2560.— In re Hewitt, 65 How., 187; 4 Browne C. P., 57; 1 Dem., 349. § 2561.— Jra re Estate of Valentine. 9 Abb. N. C, 313. In re Brown, 65 How , 461. In re Miles, 5 Redf, 110; Estate of Withers, 3 Browne C. P. , 163. In re Meeker, 9 Daly, 556. Forster vs Kane, 1 Dem., 67. Gillies vs Kreuder, 1 Dem., 349. Walton vs Howard, 1 Dem., 103. DuBois vs Brown, 1 Dem., 317. Hall vs Campbell, 1 Dem,. 415. ' § 2562— Amended 1881. Estate of Valentine. 9 Abb. N. C, 313. In re Brown, 65 How., 461. In re Miles, 5 Redf., 110 Harward vs Hulett, 5 Redf,, 330 Carroll vs Hughes, 5 Redf., 337. In re Meeker, 9 Daly, 556. Walton vs Howard, 1 Dem., 103, Du Eois vs Brown, 1 Dem,, 317. Hall vs Campbell, 1 Dem., 415. Estate of Withers, 3 Browne C. P., 163. 198 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2563. § 2564. § 2565.- -In re Hewitt, 65 How., 187; 4 Browne C. P., 57; 1 Dem., 349. § 2566.- -Schell vs Hewitt, 1 Dem., 249; 4 Browne C. P., 57; 65 How., 187. § 2567.- -In re Sexton, 3 McCarty C. P., 94; 1 Dem., 3. § 256§. § 2569. § 2570, §2571. §2572. §2573.- -In re Dunn, 1 Dem., 394. § 2574.- -Young vs t'uddy, 11 Week. Dig., 313. §2575. g 2576. — In re Gates, 26 Hun, 179. Sarvent vs Hesdra, 26 Hun, 550. In re Jackson, 19 Week. Dig , 370; 33 Hun, 300; 5 Browne C. P., 436. § 2577— Ludlow vs Pinokney, 1 Dem., 158. Du Bois vs Brown, 1 Dem., 317 § 257§.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 399. Du Bois vs Brown, 1 Dem., 317. § 2579.— Du Bois vs Brown, 1 Dem., 317. § 25§0.— Du Bois vs Brown, 1 Dem., 317. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 199 i 25S1. § 2582.- Amended 1881. i 2383. I 2584. § 2585.— Cole vs Terpennlng, 27 Hun, 111. § 2586.— in re probate will of Ross, 67 N. Y., 514: 14 Week. Dig., 39. Davis vs Clark, 87 N. Y.,-623; 2 McCarty C. P., 1. § 2587.-Freeman vs Coit, 27 Hun, 447. § 2588.— in re -will of Smith, 19 Week. Dig., 252. §2589.— Cole vsTerpenning, 27 Hun, 111. Schell vs Hewitt, 1 Dem., 249. Inre Hewitt, 65 How., 187. i 2590. § 2591.— Crosier vs Cornell Steamboat Co., 27 Hun, 315. Brown vs Landon, 30 Hun, 57; 4 Browne C. P., 11. i 2592. ; 2593. ) 2594. '§ 2595.— Estate of Weeks, 1 McC. C. P., 164. ) 2596. 200 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2597.— Estate of Weeks, 1 McC. C. P., 164. § 259§. § 2599. §2600. >2601. § 2602.— Thompson vs Mott, 1 Dem.. 32. Gruion vs Underbill, 1 Dem., 303. Hassey i'S Keller, 1 Dem., 577. § 2603.— Peck vs Sherwood, 5 Redf., 416. Spencer vs Popham, 5 Redf., 435. § 2604. § 2605.— Spencer vs Popham, 5 Redf.. 425. Boyle vs St. John. 16 Week. Dig., 24 Hun, 454. §2606.— Amended 1884, ch. 399, p. 481. Popham vs Spencer, 4 Redf., 399. Wood vs Crooke, 5 Redf., 381. Peck vs Sherwood. 5 Redf., 416. Spencer vs Popham, 5 Redf., 435. Le Count vs Le Count, 1 Dem., 39 § 2607.— Boyle vs St John, 38 Hun, 454; 16 Week. Dig . 85. Estate of Schofield, 3 Browne C. P., 333; 1 Dem., 196. § 260§.— Boyle vs St. John, 38 Hun, 454: 16 Week. Dig., 85. Estate of Schofield, 3 Browne C. P., 833; 1 Dem., 196. § 2609.— Boyle vs St. John, 38 Hun, 454; 16 Week. Dig., 85. Estate of Schofield, 3 Browne C. P., 333; 1 Dem., 196. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 20I § 2610. § 2611.— Estate of Bogert, 4 Browne C. P., 441. Younger vs Duffie, 5 Browne ( :. P., 84; 95 N. Y., 535; 28 Hun, 242. § 2612. § 2613. § 2614.— Grossman vs Grossman, 95 N. Y., 145; .5 Browne C. P., 504. § 2615. >2616. §2617.— Jra re probate will of Smith, 19 Week. Dig., 330; 95 N. Y., 517.' Lafferty vs Lafferty, 5 Eedf., 336. Stapler vs Hoffman, 1 Dem., 63. Carpenter vs Historical Society, 1 Dem., 606. § 261S.— Estate of Masters, 1 McC. C. P.. 459. Estate of Bogert, 4 Browne C. P.. 441. § 2619.— Amended laws 1883, cli. 899 Estate of Masters. 1 McC. C. P.. 459. 8 2620.— 7n re Cottrell, 95 N. Y.. 839; 19 Weels:. Dig , 3; 5 Browne C. P., 340. Whit- field vs Whitfield, 19 Week. Dig., 386. § 2621.— McNally vs Brown, 5 Redf.. 372. Hatch vs Sigman, 1 Dem., 519. Estate of Colligan, 5 Browne C. P., 198. i 2622.— Hyatt vs Lunnin, 1 Dem., 14. § 2623.— Estate of Bogert, 4 Browne C. P., 441. 202 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE g 2624.— Effray vs Foundling Asylum, 5 Redf., 557. McClure vs WooUey, 1 Dem,, , 574. In re Hagenmeyer's will, 13 Abb. N. C., 433. § 2623. § 2626.- -Amended laws 1883, ch. 399. In re probate will of Gourand, 95 N. Y., 256. § 2627. -Amended 1881. In re probate will of Gourand, 95 N. Y., 856. § 262§. S 2629. — Amended laws 1883, ch. 399. § 2630. g 26;u.- -Amended 1881. § 2632. § 2633.- -Amended 1881 and 1883, ch. 399. § 2634.- —Marx vs McGlynn, 4 Redf., 455. §2635 -Grossman vs Grossman, 5 Browne C. P., 304; 95 N. Y., 145. § 2636. -Estate of Demarest, 1 McG G. P. , 303. § 2637- -Estate of Demarest, 1 McC. C. P., 802. Martin vs Duke, 5 Redf., 597. § 263§.— Martin vs Dute, 5 Redf., 597. Hovey vs McLean, 1 Dem., 396, Ballard vs Gharlesworth, 1 Dem. , 501, Estate of Sohn, 1 McC. G. P., 373. Estate of Demarest, 1 McG. G. P., 303. § 2639. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 203 § 2640. § 2641. § 26 12.- -Amended 1883, ch. 401, P- 571. § 2643.— Amended 1881 Estate of Batchelor, 2 MoO. C. P., 391; 1 Dera., 209; 64 How., 350. In re Walter, 1 Dem., 240. § 2644.— Estate of Batchelor, 2 McC. C. P., 291; 1 Dem., 303; 64 How., 350. In re Walter, 1 Dem., 240. S 2645.— Sutton vs Weeks. 5 Redf., 353; 1 McC. C. P., 164. § 2646. § 2647.— Heilman vs Jones, 5 Redf., 398. In re Becker, 38 Hun, 307; -5 Redf., 488. In re probate will of Gourand, 95 N. Y. , 356. In re Grossman's will, 3 McC. P., 394; 3 Browne C. P., 65. Pryer vs Clapp, 1 Dem., 387. § 2648.— Amended 18S1. Becker vs Bochus, 5 Redf., 488; 28 Hun, 307. ■ In re pro- bate will of Gourand, 95 N. Y., 256. § 2649.— 7ra re probate will of Gourand, 95 N. Y., 356. In re Hoyt, 31 Hun, 176; Dem., 553. § 2650.— Jii re McGowan, 38 Hun, 346. In re Hoyt, 31 Hun. 176; 18 Week. Dig., 360; 1 Dem., 558. In re probate will of Gourand, 95 N. Y., 2.56. Bray vs Smith, 1 Dem., 168. Estate of Riegelmann, 2 Browne C. P., 98. 204 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO T HE §2651. § 2652. -In re Becker, 88 Hun, 307; 5 Redf., 488. I 2653. § 2654. § 2655. § 2656. § 2657. § 2658. § 2659. §2660. — Popham vs Spencer, 4 Redf. , 399. § 2661. —In re Demmert, 5 Redf. , 399. § 2662.- -In re Mace, 4 Redf., 335. In re Curser, «9 N. Y., , 401; 3 Browne C. P.; ,411. § 2663. g 2664. § 2665. i 2666. § 2667.— Amended 1881 and 1888, oh. 398. Sutton vs Weeks, 5 Redf., 353. In re Malloy, 1 Dem., 481; 3 Browne C. P., 15. § 266§.— In re Chase, 33 Hun, 318; 19 Week. Dig., 409. Cornwell vs Cornwell, 1 Dem., 1. Tookei vs Bell, 1 Dem., 53. West vs Mape, 14 Week. Dig., 93. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 205 § 2669.— Amended 1881. In re Chase, 19 Week. Dig., 409; 32 Hun, 318. § 2670. § 2672.— Amended 1881. Estate of Stokes, 3 Browne C. P., 384; 1 Dem., 260. In re Halsey, 13 Abb., N. C, 853. In re Hoyt, 31 Hun, 176; 1 Dem., 553. Estate of Riegel- mann, 2 Browne C. P., 9S. Estate of Fi-icke, 4 Browne C. P., 177. In re Bankard, 19 Week. Dig., 453. I 2673. § 2674.— Jn re Flandrow, 28 Hun, 279. § 2675. § 2676. § 2677. g 2678.— Amended 1883, oh. 399, p. 572. i 2679. § 2680. § 2681. . g 2682. § 2683. g 2684. § 2685.— Estate of Bemev, 2 MoC. C. P., 455; 3 Browne C. P., 122; 1 Dem., 163. Hassey vs Keller, 1 Dem., 577. ' Estate of Sohn, 1 McC. C. P., 373. 206 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 26§6. § 26§r.— Estate of Sohn, 1 McC. C. P., 373. § a68§.— 7n re Eoosevelt, 5 Redf., 601. ^2689. § 2690. g 2691. g 2692.— Boyle vs St. John, 28 Hun, 454; 16 Week. Dig., 85. § 269S.— Popham vs Spencer, 4 Redf., 399. § 2694.— Estate of Langbein, 3 Browne C. P., 236; 1 Dem., 448. • § 2695.— In re Taintor, 5 Redf., 79. In re Hudson, 5 Redf., 833. Moyer vs Weil, 1 Dem., 71. In re Langbein, 1 Dem., 448; 3 Browne C. P., 448. Browne vs Landon, 30- Hun, 57; 4 Browne C. P., 11. Estate of Thompson, 1 McC. C. P., 364. Estate of Winning- ton, 1 McC. C. P., 367. Estate of Ladd, 5 Browne 0. P., 50. § 2696.— Amended 1881. Weed vs Waterbury, 5 Redf., 114. Brown vs Landon, 30 Hun, 57; 4 Browne C. P., 11. § 2697.— Amended 1881. Estate of Batchelor, 3 McC. C. P., 391. Estate of Thomp- son, 1 McC. C. P., 364. Estate of Wise, 2 Browne C. P., 330 (note). BroAvn vs Landon, 4 Browne C. P., 11; 30 Hun, 57. § 2698.— Estate of Batchelor, 3 McC. C P., 391. Estate of Thompson, 1 McC. C. P., 364. Estate of Winnington, 1 McC. C. P., 367. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 20/ g 2699.— Estg,te of Batchelor, 2 McC. C. P., 291. §27C § 2701, § 2702.— Browne vs Landon, 30 Hun, 57; 4 Browne C. P., 11. Estate of Ladd, 5 Browne C. P., 50. § 2703.— /» re Langbein, 1 Dem., 448; 3 Browne C. P., 336. Estate of Shearer, 1 McC. C. P., 455. § 2704.— Estate of Shearer, 1 McC. C. P., 455. Estate of Winnington, 1 McC. C. P., 267. S 2705.— Jn re Hudson, 5 Redf., 333. Estate of Winnington, 1 McC. C. P., 367. Es- tate 'of Shearer, 1 McC. C. P., 455. ^2706— /» re Curry, 35 Hun, 331; 1 McC. C. P., 319; 13 Week. Dig., 279. Met. Trust Co. vs Rogers, 1 Dem., 365. Estate of Spreen, 1 McC. C. P., 375. Estate of Seaman, 16 Week. Dig., 118. S 2707. -Jn re Curry, 35 Hun, 331; 1 McC. C. P., 319. S 2708.-7)1 re Curry, 35 Hun, 331; 1 McC. C. P., 319. g 2709.— Ira re Curry, 35 Hun, 331; 1 McC. C. P., 319. § 2710.— Amended 1881. In re Seaver, 1 Dem., 865. In re Curry, 35 Hun, 331; 1 McC. C. P., 319. In re Seaman, 16 Week. Dig., 118. 208 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2711.— Amended 1881. In re Curry, 25 Hun, 331; 1 McC. C. P., 319.. § 27lfi.—In re Curry, 25 Hun, 331; 1 McC. C. P., 319. § 2713.— Jn re Curry, 35 Hun, 321; 1 McC. C. P., 319. § 2714.— In re Curry, 35 Hun, 331; 1 McC. C. P., 319; 13 Week. Dig., 379. §2715.— Jn re Mclntyre, 4 Redf., 489. Greenhough vs Greenhough, 5 Eedf., 191. Estate of Barnes, 1 McC. C. P., 59. § 2716.— Greenhough vs Greenhough, 5 Redf., 191. § 2717.— Fiester vs Shepard, 93 N. Y., 351. Estate of Riegelmann, 3 Browne C. P., 98. Riegelmann vs McCoy, 1 Dem., 86. Mumford vs Coddington, 1 Dem., 37. Thomp- son vs Mott, 1 Dem., 33. Smith vs Murray,'! Dem., 34. MoKeown vs Pagan, 4 Redf., 330. Hurlburt vs Durant, 88 N. Y., 131; 14 Week. Dig., 387; 3 Browne C. P., 115. In re Macauley, 94 N. Y., 574; 37 Hun, 577. Bayhs vs Swartwout, 4 Redf., 395. Wood vs Crnoke, 5 Redf., 381. Ch9,rlick"s estate, 11 Abb. N. C, 56. In re Hoyt, 31 Hun, 176; 1 Dem., 553; 18 Week. Dig.. 360. Estate of MoKiernan, 4 Browne C. P., 318. § 271§.-McKeown vs Fagan. 4 Redf., 320. In re Macauley, 27 Hun, 577; 94 N. Y., 574. Hurlburt vs Durant, 88 N. Y., 121; 2 Browne C. P., 115. Fiester vs Shepard, 92 N. Y., 351. Baylis vs Swartwout, 4 Redf., 395. Steinele vs Oechsler, 5 Redf., 313. Wood vs Crooke, 5 Redf., 381. Charlick's estate, 11 Xbb. N. C, 56. In re Hoyt, 31 Hun, 176; 1 Dem., 553. Thompson vs Mott, 1 Dem., 83. Smith vs Murray, 1 Dem., 34. Riegehnann vs McCoy, 1 Dem., 86; 3 Browne C. P., 98. Mumford vs Coddington, 1 Dem., 37. Estate of McKiernan, 4 Browne C. P., 318. \ CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 209. \ ' — : m — : § ^719.— Tuttle YS Heidermann, 5 Redf., 199. In re Hoyt, 31 Hun, 176; 1 Dem., 553. Riegelman vs McCoy, 1 Dem., 86; 2 Browne C. P., 98. Hurlburt vs Durant, 2 Browne C. P., 115. § 2720,— Amended 1881. iayai. § 2722.— I?i re Roosevelt, 5 Redf., 601. § 2723.— Bay lis vs Swartwout, 4 Redf., 395. In re Macauley, 94 N. Y., .",74. In Miles, 5 Redf., 110. In re Hutchinson, 19 Week. Dig., 368. § 2724.— Amended 1881. Jn re Miles, 5 Redf., 110. Hurlburt vs Durant, «8 X. Y. 121; 14 Week. Dig., 287; 2 Browne C. P., 115, 1 2725. §2726. — Spencer vs Popham, 5 Redf., 425. In re Hutchinson, 19 Week. Dig., 268. Campbell vs Pui-d,y, 5 Redf., 434. In re Cowing & Co., 26 Hun, 214. Edwards vs Ed- wards, 1 Dem., 132. § 2727.— Bay hs vs Swartwout, i Redf., 395. In re Cowing & Co., 36 Hun, 214. In re Laurent, 11 Abb. N. C, 120. § 2728.— Baylis vs Swartwout, 4 Redf., 395. Campbell vs Purdy, 5 Redf., 434. S 2729.— MoKeown vs Fagan, 4 Redf . , 330. In re Harris, 1 McC. C. P., 169. 2rO CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE • § 2730.— Amended 1881. § 2731.— Martines estate, 11 Abb. N. C, 50. Greene vs Day, 1 Dem., 45. § 2732.— Spencer vs Popham, 5 Redf., 435. § 2733. § 2734.— Tickel vs Quinn, 1 Dem., 425. §2735.— Wood vs Crooke, 5 Redf., 381. Geer vs Ransom, 5 Redf., 578. Duffy Smith, 1 Dem., 202. $5 2736.— Amended 1881.— Meeker vs Crawford, 5 Redf., 450, 455 (note). In re Roose- velt, 5 Redf., 601. Hall vs Campbell, 1 Dem., 415. . Estate of Slosson, 4 Browne C. P., 280. §2737.— Secor vs Leiitis, 5 Redf., 270. In re Roosevelt, 5 Redf., 601. Arthur vs Nelson, 1 Dem., 337. § 2738. § 2739.— Snyder vs Snyder, 30 Hun, 186; 17 Week Dig . 395; 4 Browne C. P.. 870; 5 id., 367 Estate of Brown, 2 McC. C. P., 274; 1 Dem., 136; 3 Browne C. P., 139. Meyer vs Weil, 1 Dem., 71. Fraenznick vs Miller, 1 Dem., 136; 3 McC. C. P., 274; 3 Browne C. P., 139. § 2740.-Snyder vs Snyder, 30 Hun, 186; 4 4 Browne C. P., 370; 5 id., 267. S 2741.— Thorne vs Underbill, 1 Dem., 306. ^ 2742. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 211 § 2*'43.— McKeown vs Fagan, 4 Redf., 330. Duncan vs Guest, 5 Redf., 440. Martine's Estate, il Abb. N. C, 50. In re Verplauok, 91 N. Y., 439. Estate of Brown, 2 MoC. C. P., 274; S Browne C. P., 39; 1 Dem., 136; 65 How.. 887. Green vs Day, 1 Dem., 45. Giles vs DeTalleyrand, 1 Dem., 97. DuBois vs Brown, 1 Dem., 317. Estate of Orser, 4 Browne C. P., 129. § 2744. § 2745.— Duncan vs Guest, 5 Redf., 440. i 2746. ( 2747. i 274S. § 2749.— Estate of Ladd, 5 Browne C. P., 50. j 2750.— U. S. Life Ins. Co. vs Jordon, 5 Redf., 307 !2751. j 2752.— Dennis vs Jones, 1 Dem., 80. Kammerrer vs Ziegler, 1 Dem,, 177. I 2753. § 2754.— Kammerrer vs Ziegler, 1 Dem., 177. § 2755.— Kammen-er vs Ziegler, 1 Dem.. 177. People ex rel. Adams vs Westbrook, 61 How., 138; 93 N. Y., 98. § ii756.—In re Fox, 92 N. Y., 93. People ex rel. Adams vs Westbrook, 61 How.. 138; 92 N. Y., 93. 212 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2757.— Jw re Fox, 92 N. Y., 93; 61 How., 138. Estate of Meakim, 5 Browne C. P. 431. § 275§.- -People ex rel. Adams vs Westbrook, 61 How., 138; 93 N. Y., 98. § 2759, —Dennis vs Jones, 1 Dem., 80. § 2760. § 2761.- -People ex rel. Adams vs Westbrook, 61 How., 138; 93 N. Y., 93. g 2762. §2763. § 2764. §2765. § 2766. § 2767. a 276§. § 2769. i 2770. ,2771. . § 2772. i 2773. I 2774., § 2775. § 2776. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 213 § 2777. S a77§. ; 2779. S 2780, ^2781. S 2782. g 2783. g 2784. § 2785. g 2786. § 2787. ) 2788.— People ex rel. Adams vs Westbrook, 61 How., 138; 98 N. Y., 93. g 2789. § 2790. — In re Distribution of Surplus Money of Estate of Logan, 19 Week. Dig.. 148. i279l. § 2792. § 2793.— In re Zahrt 94 N. Y., 605; 1 Dem., 444; 2 Browne C. P., 273; 18 Week. Dig., 479. Estate of Meakim, 5 Browne C. P., 421. § 2794. § 2795. § 2796.- Amended Laws 1883, ch. 399. In re Zarht, 1 Dem., 444; 94 N. Y.. 605; 2 Browne C. P., -273. 214 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE S '2797. § 2798.— White vs Poillon, 25 Hun, 69. § 2799.— Amended 1881. In re Solomon, 4 Redf., 509. In re Zahrt, 94 N. Y.. 605; 1 Dem.. 444; 2 Browne C. P., 273; 18 Week. Dig., 479. In re Estate of Logan, 19 Week. Dig., 148. § 2§00. §2801. y 2802.— In re Roosevelt, 5 Redf., 601. § 2803.— Ire re McCarter, 94 N. Y.,'558. Campbell vs Purdy, 5 Redf. , 434. § 2804.— Jn re McCarter, 94 N. Y., 558. Hurlburt vs Dm-ant, 88 N. Y., 131: 14 Week. Dig.. 387. ^ 2805,— /?i re McCarter, 94 N. .Y., 558; 18 Week. Dig., 443. In re Jackson, 16 Week. Dig., 345; 19 id., 270; 83 Hun, 300; 5 Brovirne C. P., 436. . § 2806. § 2807. § 2808.— Jji re Cowing & Co , , 26 Hun, 214. S 2810. § 2811.— Meeker vs Crawford. 5 Redf., 450. In re Roosevelt. 5 Redf , 601. Hall vii Campbell, 1 Dem, 415. Estate of Slosson, 4 Browne C. P., 280. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 21 5 § t2§12. g 2§13. § 2814. g 2il5.— 7n re Baker, 26 Hun, 636. ^■iS16. § 2817.— J)i re Eoosevelt, 5 Eedf., 601. Lang vs Marks, 3 Browne C. P., 387. § 2818.— Amended 1884, oh. 408, p. 486. Rogers vs Rogers, 4 Redf., 521. Tompkins TS Moseman, 5 Redf., 402. In re Clark, 5 Redf., 466. §2819. —In re Baker, 36 Hun., 636. In re Roosevelt, 5 Redf., 601. § 2820. S 2821.- -In re Barre, 5 Redf., 64. In re Led with, 3 McCarty C. P., 831. § 2822. S 2823.- -In re Ledwith, 8 MoC. C. P., 331; 1 Dem., 154. g 2824. ^ 2825.- -In re Ledwith, 3 McC. C. P., 331; 1 Dem., 154. S 2826. -in re Ledwith, 3 McC. C. P., 331: 1 Dem., 154. § 2827. ^ 2828. S2829. 2l6 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2§30.— Amended 1881. In re Filer, 11 Abb. N. C, 107; 3 MoCarty, 64. Rieckvs Fish, IDem., 75. ;^§3i. § 2832.— Boiling vs Coughlin, 5 Redf., 116. In re Kerrigan, 2 MoC. C. P., 334. § 2§33. § 2834. § 2835. § 2837.— Center vs Sproat, 10 Week. Dig., 447. , § 2839. § 2840. 2841. S 2842. § 2843. g 2844.— Amended 1881. S 2845. § 2846. § 2847. § 2848.— Amended 1881. §2849. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 217 § 2850.— Amended Laws 1883, ch."400. hi re Cowing & Co., S6 Hun, 314. § 2851.— In re Schroeder, 65 How., 194. § 2852.— Geoghegan vs Foley, 5 Redf., 501. S 2853. \ 2854. §2855. § 2856. ;2857. § 2858. § 2859.-0 Redf., 391, 398. 601. , 2860. §2861. j 2862.— Baldwin vs Roberts, 30 Hun, 163. I 2863.— Amended Laws 1883, ch 399. Snyder vs Hughes, 37 Hun, 373. Burdick TS Hale, 13 Abb. N. C, 60; 4 Browne C. P., 311 . Steele vs McDonald, 4 Browne C. P., 337. § 2864. S 2865.— Amended Laws 1883, ch. 399. §2866. § 2867. § 2868. ~~ 2l8 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2S69.-Bird vs Crane, S6 Hun, 531. " § 2§y0.— People ex rel. Sohlosser vs Porter, 25 Hun, 601; 13 Week. Dig., 473. JIc- Neary vs Chase, 30 Hun, 491. § 2871.- — People ex rel. Sohlosser vs Porter, 25 Hun, 601 ; 13 Week. Dig., 472. g 2§72.- —People ex rel. Sohlosser vs Porter, 25 Hun, 601; 13 Week. Dig., 472. § 2873.- —People ex rel. Sohlosser vs Porter, 25 Hun, 601 ; 13 Week. Dig., 472. § 2874.- —People 62! rel. Sohlosser vs Porter, 25 Hun, 601; 13 Week. Dig., 472 § 2875. § 2876. -Bird vs Crane, 36 Hun, 531. § 2877.- -McNeary vs Chase, 30 Hun, 491. § 2878. § 2879. § 2880. §2881. § 2882. § 2883. §2884. § 2885. ' § 2886.- -Bishop vs VanVechten, 2 McCarty C. P., 28; 62 How., 261 ;10Abb. N.C..320. t 2887. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 219 ;2§§8. § >i8§9. § 2890.— Bishop vs VanVechten, 2 MoCarty C. P. , 38; 62 How., 261; 10 Abb. N. C., 220. §2891. § 2892. — Fowler vs Haynes, 91 N. Y. , 346. §2893. -Flint vs 1 Gault, 15 Hun, 213. § 2894. - Sullivan vs Presdee !, 9 Daly, 552. § 2895.- -Searing vs Xjoodstein, 11 Abb. N. C. ,450; 2 MoC. C. P.; , 270; 64 How.. ,426. S 2896. § 2897. . § 2898. S 2899. ii900. §2901.- -McNeary vs Chase, 30 Hun, 491. § 2902 - — McNeary vs Chase, 30 Hun, 491. S 2903. §2904. §2905. §2906.- -Sullivan ■ vs Presdee , 9 Daly, 552. § 2907.— Sullivan vs Presdee, 9 Daly, 552. 220 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2908, g 2909. § 2910. §2911. g 2912. § 2913. § 2914. § 2915. g 2916. § 2917. § 291§. § 2919. § 2920. §2921. § 2922. § 2923. § 2924. § 2925. § 2926. § 2927. §292§. §2929. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 221 I 2930. § 2931.— Delin vs Stohl, 2 Browne C. P., 222. § 2932. § 2933.— Delin vs Stohl, 3 Browne C. P., 232. ;2934. \ 2935. ) 2936. § 2937. i 293§. ) 2939. g 2940.— Matteson vs Hall, 64 How., 515. Green vs Waite. 19 Week. Dig., 436. § 2941 —Green vs Waite, 19 Week. Dig,, 436. ^ 2942. ;2943. § 2944.— Ferguson vs McDonald, 18 Week. Dig., 138. ; 2945. § 2946. i 2947. ^ 294§. i 2949.— Matteson vs Hall, 64 How., 515. I 2950. 222 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 2951— Gates vs Canfield, 2 MoCarty, C. P., 16; 3 id., 355; 3 Browne C. P., 354. In re White, 13 Abb. N. C , 348. § 8952.— 7n re White, 13 Abb. N. C, 348. §2953. S 2954. S 2955. § 2956. § 2957.— Fox vs Erie P. Co., 93 N Y., 54; 17 Week Dig., 97. g 2958. S 2959. § 2960. §29^r S 2962. § 2963. g 2964. § 2965. § 2966. § 2967. §296§. § 2969. g 2970. CODE OF Civil, PROCEDURE. 223 ■2971. i 29T2. I 2973. § 2974. § 2975. , 2976. i 2977, § 297*. § 2979. , 29§0. i2981. § 2982. S 29§3. ) 2984. \ 2983. i 2986.— Denny vs Horton, 3 Browne C. P., 355. i 2987. § 2988 —Hurry vs Coffin, 2 Browne C. P., 319. §2989. § 2990. § 2991. § 2992. 224 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 8993.— Powens vs Jones, 10 Abb. N. C, 4-58. §2994. S 2995. i^ 2996. § 299'!'. i 2998. § 2999, § 3000. S 300I. ^ 3002. § 3003. ; 3004. § 3003. §3006. § 3007. §3008. I 3009. S 3010. §3011. § 3012. § 3013. § 3014. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 225 S !1015.— People ex rel. "White vs Loomis, 3 Browne C. P., 278. g 3016. ^ I 3017.— Kincaid vs Richardson, 25 Hun. 237; 9 Abb. N C, 315 Baldwin vs Roberts 30 Hun, 163. Searing vs Goodstein, 64 How., 426; 11 Abb. N. C, 450; 3 McC. C. P., 370, Cunningham vs Eiseman, 4 Browne C. P., 220. § 3018.— Searing vs Goodstein, 11 Abb. N. C, 450; 2 McC. 0. P., 270; 64 How., 426 3 Browne C. P., 464. i 3019. § 3020. I 3021 . § 3022.— Searing vs Goodstein, 64 How., 486; 11 Abb. N. C, 450; 2 McC. C. P., 270; I Browne C. P. , 464. g 3023. § 3024.— Kincaid vs Richardson, 9 Abb. N. C, 315; 25 Hun, 237. § 3025. § 3026. § 3027. §3028. § 3029. § 3030. 226 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §3031. § 3032. § 3033.— Amended 1888, ch. 394, p. 569. 3034. , 3035. § 3036. , 3037. g 3039. § 3040. I 3041. § 3042. I 3043. § 3044. — Commissioners of Jamaica vs Allen, 32 Hun, 61. Quick vs Wixon, 37 Hun? 593. g 3045. § 3046.— Amended Laws 1883, oh. 399. Gutbrecht vs P. P. & C. I. R. R. Co., 28 Hun, 497. Bishop vs VauVechten, 2 McCarty C. P., 38; S. C, 63 How., 261; 10 Abb. N. C, 320. Hurry vs Coffin, 3 Browne C. P., 430. Lewis vs Hoffman, 5 Browne 0. P., 141. § 3047.— Sherwood vs Travelers Ins. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 381; 3 Browne C. P., 67 65 How., 193. Struve vs Droge, 63 How., 258. Lewis vs Hoffman, 5 Browne C. P., 141 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 227 S 3048. § 3049.-Gutbrecht vs P. P. & 0. I. R. R. Co.. 28 Hun, 497. Lewis vs Hofeman, 5 Browne O. P., 141. Ross vs Markham, 5 Browne C. P., 81. § 3050.— Elson vs Murray, 27 Hun, 536. Struve vs Droge, 62 How., 258. Sherwood vs Travelers Ins. Co., 65 How., 193; 3 Browne C. P., 281. Ross vs Markham, 5 Browne C. P, 81. {^3051. § 3052. § 3053.— Gardner vs Smith, 2 Browne C. P., 420. , 3054. I 3055. g 3056. I 3057. I 3058.- Sherwood vs Travelers Ins. Co., 3 Browne C. P , 281; 65 How., 193. § 3059. § 3060.— Sherwood vs Travelers Ins. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 281; 65 How., 198. Clark vs CarroU, 61 How., 47. S 3061. § 3062.— Amended 1883. ch. 390, p. 567. Matteson vs Hall, 64 How., 515. § 3063.— Matteson vs Hal], 64 How., 515. Fritze vs Pultz. 2 Browne C. P., 142. 228 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 3064. § 3065. § 3066.- -Horton vs Hawkins, 20 Week. Dig., 17. § 3067.- -Quick vs Wixon, 37 Hun, 592. Clark vs Carroll, 61 How., 47. § 3068.— Bishop vs VanVechten, 2 McCarty C. P., 38. Matteson vs Hall, 64 How., .515. Harvey vs Vandyke, 66 How., 396. § 3069.— Ross vs Markham, 5 Browne C. P., 81. § 30rO.— Snyder vs Hughes, 37 Hun, 373. Garling vs Ladd, 37 Hun, 113. Quick vs Wixon, 37 Hun, 593; 15 Week. Dig., 338. Kelly vs Bonesteel, 39 Hun, 546; 17 Week. Dig , 336. Atkins vs Pitcher, 31 Hun, 353. § 3071.— Snyder vs Hughes, 37 Hun, 373. Quick vs Wixon, 37 Hun, 592; 15 Week. Dig., 238. § 3072. § 3073.— Quick vs Wixon, 37 Hun, 592; 15 Week. Dig., 238. § 3074. § 3075. § 3076. § 3077. § 3078. § 3079. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. § 3080. g 30§1. g 3083. § 3083. § 3084. § 3085. § 3086. § 3087. g 3088. § 3089. § 3090. §3091. §3092. § 3093. §3094. § 3095. (^ 3096. § 3097. § 3098. . § 3099. § 3100. §3101. 230 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 3102. i 3103. § 3104. ; 3105. i 3106. S 3107. I 310§. §3109. § 3110. §3111. § 311ii. §3113. ,3114. g 311d. § 3116. §3117. §3118. §3119. I 3120. §3121, §3122. § 3123. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I 3124. I 3125. § 3126.— Mun-y vs Coffin, 2 Browne, C. P. , 319. §3t27. §312S. § 3129. § S130. § 3131. 8 3132. § 3133. i3134. , 3135. g 3136. § 3137. § 313§. § 3139. § 3140. §3141. § 3142. §3143. g 3144. § 3145. 2-32 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 3146. § 3147. g 3148. g 3149. I 3150. §3151. 3152. ; 3153. § 3154,— Baldwin vs Roberts, 30 Hun, 163. § 3155. § 3156. §3157. § 315§. 3159. § 3160. — Stephenson vs Hanson. 4 Browne C. P., 104. 3161. § 3162. § 3163. § 3164. § 3165.- -Gribbon vs Preel, 93 N. Y., ,93; 3McC. C. P.; ,483; 62 How., ,273. 3166. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 233 § 3167.— Moller vs Tuska, 87 N. Y., 166. § 316§. § 3169.— Wentzler vs Ross, 59 How., 397. Fielding vs Lucas, 87 N. Y., 197; 13 Week. Dig., 358. Mershon vs Leonard Scott Pub. Co., 4 Browne C. P., 319. § 3170. §3171. § 3172. §3173. i 3174. § 3175. § 3176. §3177. § 3178. § 3179. § 3180. §3181. § 3182. §3183. § 3184. ■ §3185. § 3186. 234 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE §31S7. § 318§. § 31§9. § 3190. § 3191.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 399. Shaw vs McCarty, 2 McCarty C. P., 49; 59 How., 487. Walsh vs Schulz, 19 Week. Dig., 460. § 3192. £ 3193. >3194. ^ 3195. g 3196. I 3197. §3I9§. §3199. g 3200. § 3201. § 3202. § 3203. § 3204. § 3205. § 3206. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 235 \ 3207. S320§. § 3209— Searing vs Goodstein, 11 Abb. N. C, 4.10; 3 McC. C. P., 270; 64 How., 426: Stem T8 Moss, 19 Week. Dig., ,538, § 3210.— Amended 1884, oh. 409, p. 487. Sullivan vs Presdee, 9 Daly, .5.52. § 3211.— Sullivan vs Pre&dee, 9 Daly, 552. Lang vs Marks, 3 Browne C. P., 287. § 3212. § 3213.- Amended 1883, oh. 231, p. 336. Gardner vs Smith. 2 Browne C. P., 430. Hurry vs Coffin, 3 Browne 0. P., 319. Clark vs Carroll, 61 How., 47. § 3214.— SuUivan vs Presdee, 9 Daly, 553. Beer vs Benner, 3 MoC. C. P., 266; 2 Browne C. P., 362. § 3215.— Mayor vs Decker, 65 How., 472. § 3216.-Dinkel vs Wehle, 11 Abb. N. C, 124; 63 How., 298. g3217. § 3218. ! 3219. S 3220.— Searing vs Goodstein, 11 Abb. N. C, 450; 64 How., 436; 2 McC. C. P., 270. fit re Security Life Ins. & Annuity Co., 31 Hun, 36. i;3221. 236 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 3223.— Connor vs Hilton, 66 How., 144. I 3224. I 3225. § 3226. § 3227.— Amended 1881. Murtha vs Curley, 65 How., 86; 92 N. Y., 359. § 3228.— Combs vs Combs, 35 Hun, 379; 63 How., 304; 1 McC. C. P., 398. Lane vs VanOrden, 11 Abb. N. C, 338; 63 How., 337. Rice vs Childs, 28 Hun, 303; 16 Week. Dig,, 445. Green vs Village of Canandaigua, 30 Hun, 306. Langdon vs Guy, 91 N. Y., 661; 16 Week. Dig, 201. Murtha vs Curley, .93 N. Y., 359; 65 How., 86: 49 Super. Ct., 489; 3 Browne C. P., 266. Newcomb vs Hale, 13 Abb. N. C, 338; 64 How., 400; 4 Browne C. P., 35. Revere Copper Co. vs Dimmock, 39 Hun, 399. Snyder vs Hughes, 27 Hun, 373. Spraa;ue vs Richards, 30 Hun. 246. Boardway vs Scott, 31 Hun, 378. Burdick vs Hale, 13 Abb. N. C, 60; 4 Browne C. P., 311. Baine vs City of Rochester, 85 N. Y., 523; 63 How., 346: 1 McC. C. P., 269. Jones vs Emery, 1 McC. C. P., 338. Steele vs McDonald, 4 Browne C. P., 227. § 3229.— Baine vs City of Rochester, 85 N. Y., 523; 62 How., 346; 1 McC. C. P., 269. Lane vs VanOrden, 11 Abb. N. C, 328; 63 How., 337. Smith vs Cooper, 30 Hun, 395. N. Y. El. R. R. Co. vs McDaniel, 31 Hun, 310. N. Y. El. R. R. Co. vs Phila. Arch-Iron Co., 18 Week. Dig., 325. Frazer vs Hunt, 18 Week. Dig., 390. Murtha vs Curley, 93 N. T., 359; 65 How., 86; 49 Super. Ct., 489. Snyder vs Hughes, 27 Hun, 373. Quick vs Wixon, 27 Hun, 592. Burdick vs Hale, 13 Abb. N. C, 60; 4 Browne C. P., 311. In re Leary, 30 Hun, 394. Aikman vs Harsell, 5 Browne C. P., 93. COI3E OK CIVIL PROCEDURE. 237 § 3230. -Murtha vs Curley, 93 N. Y., 359; 49 Super. Ct., 4K); 65 How., 8«. Newcomb TsHale, 12 Abb. N. C, 339; 64 How., 400; 4 Browne C. P . 25. Fredericks vs Niver, 28 < Hun, 417. Burdick vs Hale, 13 Abb. N. C, 60: 4Browne C. P , 311. Black vs O'Brien 23 Hun, 82. De Meli vs De Meli, 5 Browne C. P., 306. § 3231.— Abbott vs Johnstown &c. Horse R. R. Co., 24 Hun, 132; 12 Week. Dig., 189 Levin vs Haas, 25 Hun, 266. Quin vs Bowe, 11 Abb. N. C, 115; 10 Daly, 505. § 3232.— Adams vs Ward, 60 How., 388. § 3233.— Phipps vs Carman, 26 Hun, 518. 8 3234.— Cooper vs Jolly, 30 Hun, 234; 3 Browne C. P., 9; 17 Week. Dig., 571. Williard vs Strachan, 3 Browne C. P., 452. ^ /i , , /, U . /oi % 3235.— Gates vs Capfield, 28 Hun. 13: 2 McCartv C. P., 16: 2 id.. 255: 64 How., 81; % Browne C. P., 254. Falkel vs Moore, 19 Week. Dig., 58. g 3236.- Jk re Booth, 11 Abb, N. C, 145. Veeder vs Mudgett, 27 Hun, 519. ^ 3237.— Murtha vs Curley, 93 N. Y., 359; 49 Super. Ct., 489; 65 How., 86; 3 Browne C. P., 366. § 3238.— Combs vs Combs, 35 Hun, 379; 63 How., 304; 1 McC. C. P.. 398. Murtha vs Curlev, 93 N. Y., 359: 49 Super. Ct., 489; 65 How., 86; 3 Browne C. P., 366; id., 86. Han- selt vs Godfrey, 3 Browne C. P., 116. Sprague vs Richards, 30 Hun, 346. Clark vs Car- roll, 61 How., 47. Comley vs Mayor, 1 McC. C. P., 306. Havemeyer vs Havemeyer. 1 McC. C. P., 448. 238 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 3239.— Verplanck vs Kendall, 47 Super. Ct., 513. Phipps vs Carman, 26 Hun, Sis' Higgina vs Callahan, 2 Browne C. P., 302; 10 Daly, 420. , '■ g 3240 —Amended 1881. In re Simpson, 26 Hun, 459. In re N. Y., L. & W. R R Co.. &c., 26 Hun, 592; S. C, 63 How., 123. In re Protestant Episcopal Pub. School, 86 N. Y., 396. Cole vs Terpenning, 27 Hun, 111 In re Department of Public Parks, 27 Hun 305. Hearn vs Sullivan, 13 Abb. N. C, 371. In re Schaller, 62 How., 40. People ex reV Bray vs Supervisors of Ulster Co., 65 How., 327. In re Thorn, 10 Daly, 71. People vs City Bank of Rochester, 19 Week. Dig., 119. Youmans vs Teri-y, 19 Week. Dig., 269. §3241. § 3242. § 3243. S 3244. § 3245.— Baine vs City of Rochester, 80 N. Y.. 523; 62 How.. 346: 1 McC. C. P., 269. Williams vs City of Buffalo, 25 Hun, 301; 13 Week. Dig., 142. Marsh vs Village of Lan- smgburgh, 31 Hun, 514; 18 Week. Dig., 386. Utioa Water Works Co. vs City of Utica, 31 Hun, 426; 19 Week. Dig., 14. Dressel vs City of Kingston, 32 Hun, 526; 19 Week. Dig., 172. Greene vs Village of Canandaigua, 30 Hun, 306; 17 Week. Dig.. 555. § 3246.— Felt vs Dorr, 29 Hun, 14. Bedell vs Barnes, 29 Hun. 589; 17 Week. Dig., 312. Miller vs Miller. 32 Hun, 481; 19 Week. Dig., 14.5. Tolman vs S., B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 92 N. Y., 353. Feig vs Wray. 2 McC C. P., 386; 3 Browne C. P., 159: (U How., 391. Comm'rs Public Char., &c. vs Casiatir, 62 How., 113. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 239 , § S247.— Remington Paper Co. vs O'Dougherty, 32 Hun, 255; 19 Week. Dig., 53. Slaueon vs Watkins, 46 N. Y. Super. Ct., 172; 18 Week. Dig., 561. Fi-edericks vs Niver, 2K Hun «7; 16 Week. Dig., 14. Struve vs Droge, 62 How, , 358. S S24§.— Baine vs City of Rochester, 85 N. Y., 523: 62 How,, 346: 1 MoC. C, P.. ar,!). Smith vs Cooper. 30 Hun, 395. ; 3249.— Fish vs Wing, 1 McC. C. P,, 331. § 3250.— /n re N. Y., L. & W. R. R. Co. &a., 26 Hun, 592; 63 How., 123. Struve vs Droge, 63 How., 258. §3251.— In re N. Y., L. & W. R. R. Co. Sec, 26 Hun, 592; 63 How., 123. Gay vs Seibold, 3 Browne C. P., 169. Newman vs Grieff, 3 Browne C. P., 362. Estate of Stokes, 3 Browne C. P., 384. Gates vs Canfield, 28 Hun, 12. Revere Copper Co. vs Dimmock, 29 Hun, 299. Veeder vs Mudgett, 27 Hun, 519. Sprague vs Richards, 30 Hun, 346. Wash- burn vs Oliver, 62 How., 482. Malcolm vs Hamill. 65 How.. 506; 4 Browne C. P., 221. Andrews vs Schnitzler, 2 Browne C. P., 18. Utica Water Works vs City of Utica, 19 .Week. Dig., 14: 31 Hun, 426. Goodridge vs Conner, 66 How.,, 143. S S252.— iVi re Hulbert, 61 How., 98. Bean vs Tonnelle, 1 McC. C. P.. 33. § 3253.- Voorhis vs French, 47 Super. Ct., 364. VanSlyke vs VanLoan, 36 Hun, 844. Lane vs VanOrden, 11 Abb. N. C, 338; 60 How., 237. People vs Giroux, 39 Hun, 248. N. Y. El. R. R. Co. vs Harold, 30 Hun, 466. Peeple vs Genesee Valley C. R. R. Co.. 30 Hun. 585. Rosa vs Jenkins, 31 Hun, 384. Weed vs Paine, 31 Hun. 10; 13 Abb. "N. C, 200; 4Browne C. P., 305; 18 Week. Dig., 30. Conaughty vs Saratoga Co. Bank, 92 N. Y., 401; 28 Hun, 373. DeStuckle vs Tehuantepeo, R. R. Co., 3 Browne C. P., 410; 65 How., 288; 17 Week. Dig,, 316. Cook vs Ryan, 39 Hun, 248. Musgrave vs Sherwood, 39 Hun. 47.1, Tolman vs S., B. & N Y. R. R. Co.. 31 Hun, 397. In^re Hulbert, 61 How,, 98. Voorhis vs French, 61 How., 161. Williams vs W. U. Tel. Co., 61 How., 305; 1 McC. C. P., 194. Woonsocket Rub. Co. vs Rubber Clothing Co., 62 How., 180; 1 McC. C. P., 350. Barclay vs Culver, 66 How., 343; 4 Browne C. P., 365. Howell vs Miller, 5 Browne C. P.. 164. 240 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE g 325S.— Continued. • § 3254.— Riggs vs Cragg, 36 Hun, 89. Weed vs Paine, 31 Hun, 10: 13 Abb. N. C, 20O; 4 Browne C. P., 305; 18 Week. Dig., 20. § 3256.— Sanders vs Townshend, 11 Abb. N. C, 217. Douglass vs Atwell, 2 MoC. C. P., 390; 3 Browne C. P., 80. Veeder vs Judson, 91 N. Y., 374; 27 Hun, 519. Higgins v» Callahan, 2 Browne C. P., 302; 10 Daly, 430. Eothery vs N. Y. Rubber Co., 24 Hun, 173. Hall vs U. S. Reflector Co., 4 Browne C. P., 148; 31 Hun, 609. § 3257. § 3258.— Porter vs Cobb, 25 Hun, 184; 13 Week. Dig., 45. In re Leary, 30 Hun, 394. Smitli vs Cooper, 30 Hun, 395; 17 Week. Dig., 490. § 3259. g 3260. ^ 3261. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 24I § 3262.— Williams vs W. U. Tel. Co., 1 MoC. C. P., 194; 61 How., 30o; Higgins vs Callahan, 2 Browne C. P., 303; 10 Daly, 420. § 3263. § 3264.— Mathews vs Matson, 3 Browne C. P., 157. § 3265.— Mathews vs Matson, 3 Browne C. P., 157. Comley vs Mayor, 1 McC. C. P. . Washburne vs Oliver, 62 How., 482. I 3266. § 326T.— Robitzek vs Hect, 3 Browne C. P.. 15B. Adams vs Ward, 60 How., 288. g 3268.— Lewis vs Farrell, 46 Super. Ct. (J. & S.), 358. Schultz vs Third Ave. R. R. Co., 49 Super. Ct , 95; 17 Week. Dig., 207. Ryan vs Potter, 3 McCarty C. P., 38; 4 Browne C. P., 80 (note), id., 82. Bostwiok vs Fifield, 2 McCarty C. P., 130; 63 How., 377; 4 Browne C. P., 79. Buckley vs G. P. & R. M'f g Co., 3 Browne C. P., 428; 17 Week. Dig., 141. Boylan vs Mathews, 3 Browne C. P., 38. Robertson vs Barnum, 39 Hun, 657. Irving vs Garrity, 13 Abb. N. C, 182; 4 Browne 0. P., 105. Wiley vs Arnoux, 60 How., 187. Healy vs Twenty-Third Street R. R. Co., 1 McC. C. P., 15. Horton vs Shepherd, 1 McC. C. P., 36. Fish vs Wing, 1 McC. C. P., 331. McCall vs Frith, 3 Browne C. P., 9; 4 id., 103. Nichols vs Cammann, 3 Browne C. P., 375. In re Levy, 10 Daly, 391. McNamara vs Har- ris, 4 Browne C. P., 76. Erickson vs Poey, 5 Browne C. P., 413. Stephenson vs Hanson, 4 Browne C. P., 104. Hayes vs Second Ave. R. R. Co., id., 84; S. C, 5 id., 155. Fitzsim mens vs Curley, 19 Week. Dig., 499. 242 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § S269.— Healy vs Ty> enty-Tbird Street R. B. Co., 1 McC. C. P., 15. Horton vs Shep- herd, 1 McC. C. P., 26. Stephenson vs Hauson, 4 Browne C. P., 104. Hayes vs Second Ave. R. R. Co., 5 Browne C. P., 155. Fitzsimmons vs Curley, 19 Week. Dig., 496. §3270.— Healy vs Twenty-Third Street R. R. Co., 1 McC. C. P., 15. Hofifman vs Lowell, 4 Browne C. P., 103. 9 3271.— Sullivan vs Remington S. M. Co., 27 Hun, 270; 14 Week. Dig., 523; 2 Browne C. P., 68. Sharp vs Fancher, 29 Hun. 193; 16 Week. Dig., 207. Tolman vs S., B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 92 N. Y., 353. Ryan vs Potter, 2 McCarty C. P., 33; 4 Browne C. P., 80. Board of Commissioners of Excise vs McGrath, 27 Hun, 425. Lewis vs Lewis, 18 Abb. N. C, 182 (note). Murphey vs Travers. 60 How., 301. Comm'rs Pub. Char, vs Casiatir, 62 How., 113. Healy vs Twenty-Third Street R. R. Co., 1 McC. C. P , 15. Fish vs Wing, 1 McC. C. P., 231. § 3272.— Robertson vs Barnum 29 Hun, 657; 17 Week. Dig., 91. Buckley vs G. P. & R. M'f'g Co., 3 Browne C. P., 428. Hasler vs Johnston, 59 How., 432. Weber vsMoog,13 Abb. N. C. 108. McCall vs Frith, 4 Browne C. P., 102; 2 id., 9. § 3273. § 3274. § 3275. § 3276.- -Robertson vs Barnum, 29 Hun, 657. g 3277.— Lewis vs Lewis, 13 Abb. N. C, 182 (note). Hoffman vs Ridley, 4 Browne C. P,, 41. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 243 § S27S.— Pobertson vs Barnum, 39 Hun, 657. In re Levy, 3 Brown, C. P., 108. § 3279.— Easier vs Johnston, 59 How., 433. I 32§0. g 32S1. § 32§2. S 32§3. § 32§4. — In re Clerk of City Court of Brooklyn, 35 Hun, 593. Chambers vs Appleton, 47 Super. Ct., 534. I 32§5. i 32S6. § 3287.— VanGelder vs VanGelder, 36 Hun, 356. Hall vs U. S. Reflector Co., 31 Hun, 609. Mallory vs Reichert, 5 Browne C. P., 341. § 32§S. §3289. § 3290. § 3291, § 3292. § 3293. g 3294. § 3293. 244 \ CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 3296.— Mark ve City of Buffalo, 87 N. Y., 184; 13 "Week. Dig., 415. Greenwood vs Marvin, 39 Hun, 99. In re SchaUer, 10 Daly, 57. In re Fairchild, 10 Daly, 74. Brady vs Kingsland, 5 Browne C. P.. 413: 19 Week. Dig., 461. Green vs Nassau Bank, 18 Week. Dig., 58. § 3297.- Race vs Gilbert, 33 Hun, 360. Maher vs O'Connor, 61 How., 103; 1 McC. C. P., 158. Lockwood vs Fox, 1 McC. C. P., 407. Brady vs Kingsland, 5 Browne C. P., 413; 19 Week. Dig., 461. , 329§. g 3299. § 3300. § 3301 :— Amended 1882, ch. 399. Chambers vs Appleton, 47 Super. Ct., 534. Dow vs Darragh, 93 N. Y., 537; 3 McC. C. P., 839. § 3302. § 3303. §3304. § 3305. § 3306. § 3307.— Amended 1884, ch. 463, p. 534. O'Connor vs O'Conner, 47 Super. Ct.. 498. McKeon vs Horsfall, 88 N. Y., 439. Van Gelder vs Van Gelder, 26 Hun, 356; 14 Week. Dig., 44. Woodruff Imperial Fire Ins. Co., 37 Hun, 339; 90 N. Y., 531; 15 Week. Dig., 23. Hall vs U. S. Reflector Co., 31 Hun, 609; 18 Week. Dig., 504; 4 Browne C. P., 148. Maher vs O'Connor, 61 How., 103; 1 MoC. C. P., 158. Lockwood vs Sax, 1 McC. C. P., 407, Bowe vs Campbell, 2 Browne C. P., 333. Flack vs The State, 19 Week. Dig., 83; 5 Browne C. P., 386. Doyle vs Doyle, 4 Browne C. P., 365. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 245 S 3308.— Maher vs O'Connor, 61 How., 103; 1 MoC. 0. P., 158. Lookwood vs Fox 1 McC. C. P., 407. § 3309.— Flack vs State of N. Y., .5 Browne C. P., 286; 19 Week. Dig., 83. i 3310. (3311. § 3312.— Amended 1881. ,3313 i3314. !3315. ($3316. § 3317. I 331§. ^ 3319. § 3320.- J« re Woven Tape Skirt Co., 85 N. Y., 506. Attorney General vs Continen- tal Life Ins. Co., 19 Week. Dig., 81. § 3321.— Veeder vs Mudgett, 37 Hun, 519; 91 N. Y., 374. g 3322. § 3323. §3324. 246 CODE ANNOTATIONS REFERRING TO THE § 3326. § 33a7. § 332§.- -Powens vs Jones, 10 Abb. N. C, 458. § 3329. § 3330. § 3331.— Woodruff vs Imperial Fire Ins. Co., 90 N. Y., 531; 16 Week. Dig., 14; 27 Hun, 239. Green vs Nassau Bank, 18 Week. Dig., 58. § 3332.— In re will of Gates, 36 Hun, 179. § 3333.— Killoran vs Barton, 26 Hun, 648 People ex rel. Byrne vs French, 12 Abb. N. C, 156. Young vs Cuddy, 23 Hun, 349. Zn re Attorney, 83 N. Y., 164. Jn re Thorn, 10 Daly, 71. § 3334.— 7n re Probate Will of Smith, 19 Week. Dig., 230. In re Will of Gates, 26 Hun, 179. People ex rel. Byrne vs French, 12 Abb. N. C, 156. Young vs Cuddy, 23 Hun, 249. In re Thorn, 10 Daly 71. People vs City Bank of Rochester, 19 Week. Dig., 119. § 3335. § 3336. § 3337.— Killoran vs Barton, 36 Hun, 648. § 3338.— Adriance vs Sanders, 2 McC. C. P., 363. § 3339.— Bulkley vs Staats, 81 Hun, 137; 66 How., 357. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 247 ; 3340. § 3341. — Dickinson vs Mayor, &c., 92 N. Y., 584. § 3342.— People ex rel. Fries vs Riley, 25 Hun. 587. § 3343.— Lewis ts Farrell, 46 Super. Ct. (J. &. S.) 358. Boggart vs Dart, 25 Hun, 395. ' Woodruff vs Imp. F. Ins. Co., 90 N. Y.. 521. People ex rel. Negus vs Dwyer, 90 N. Y , 402; 1 McC. C. P., 484 Bostwick vs Fifield, 2 McC. C. P., 130; 4 Browne C. P., 79. Haines vs Jeroloman, 2 McC. C. P., 196. Plimp/;on v& Bigelow, 2 McC. C. P., 431; 12 Abb. N. C, 203; 29 Hun, 362; 93 N. Y., 592. "Wertheim vs Continental R'y & Trust Co., 3 Browne C. P., 371. Rodbourn vs XJ., I. & E. R'y Co., 28 Hun, 369. WeUer vs Schreiber, 11 Abb. N. C, 175; 63 How., 491. Market National Bank of New York vs Pacific National Bank, 2 Browne C. P., 330. In re Thorn, 10 Daly, 71. ; 3344. ) 3345. I 3346. g 3347.— Amended 1881, laws 1882, ch. 399. Amended 1883, ch. 229, p. 235. Lewis vs Farrell, 46 Super. Ct., J. & S., 358. In re Mace, 4 Redf., 325. Combs vs Combs, 25 Hun, 279; 1 McC. C. P., 298 Woodhouse vs Woodhouse, 5 Redf., 131. Joel vs Ritter- man, 5 Redf., 136. LafEerty vs Lafferty, 5 Redf., 326. Sarvent vs Hesdra, 26 Hun, 550. In re will of Gates'. 26 Hun, 179. Snyder vs Snyder, 26 Hun, 324. In re Meeker, 9 Daly, 556, Fredericks vs Niver, 28 Hun, 417. Marsh vs ViUage of Lansingburgh, 31 Hun, 514. In re Dissosway, 91 N. Y., 235. In re Weston, 91 N. Y., 502; 16 Week. Dig., 497. Mills vs Hoffman, 92 N. Y., 131. People ex rel. Murphy vs French, 92 N. Y., 306; 16 Week. Dig., 516. Schultz vs Third Ave. R. R. Co., 49 Super. Ct., 95; 17 Week. Dig., 207. In re Sexton, 2 McCarty C. P., 94: 1 Dem., 3. McKay vs Reed, 12 Abb. N. C, 58 (note). Gar- ling vs Ladd, 27 Hun, 112. People ex rel. Fuller vs Carnev, 29 Hun, 47. Peeple ex rel. Nash vs Faulkner, 31 Hun, 317. Bingham vs Burlingame," 19 Week. Dig., 447. 248 ' ^ , CODE ANNOTATIONS. I 334 7. --Continued. § 3348.— Lafiferty vs Lafferty, 5 Redf., 336. § 3349.— Geoghegan vs Foley, 5 Eedf., 501. Garling vs Ladd, 27 Hun, 113. Sarvent vs Hesdra, 26 Hun, 550. § 3350. I 3351. § 3352.— Kincaid vs Richardson, 35 Hun, 237. IT. S. Life Ins. Co. vs Jordan, 5 Redf., 207. Geoghegan vs Foley, 5 Redf., 501. People ex rel. Sheridan vs French, 31 Hun, 617; 13 Abb. N. C, 413. In re Sexton, 2 McCarty C. P., 94; 1 Dem., 3. Garling vs Ladd, 27 Hun, 113. § 3353.— Stuckle vs Tehuantepec R'y Co., 65 Hovr., 388; 3 Browne C. P., 410. ^ 3354. § 3355.— Amended laws 1883, ch. 399. People ex rel. Sheridan vs French, 31 Hun, 617; 13 Abb. N. C, 413. Peck vs Peck, 60 How., 306; 8 Abb. N. C, 400. In re Clerk City Court, 35 Hun, 592. g 3356.— People ex rel. Sheridan vs French, 31 Hun, 617; 13 Abb. N. C, 413. In re Sexton, 3 McCarty C. P., 94. Greenwood vs Marvin, 29 Hun, 99. Peck vs Peck, 60 How., 306; 8 Abb. N. C, 400. In re Clerk City Court, 35 Hun, 593. ', * faff '*.fl«liiv' A.* 4^^