HUNTINGTON FREE LIBRARY AND READING ROOM MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN HEYE FOUNDATION Huntington Free Library Native American Collection CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 1924 100 743 115 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924100743115 PHALLISM IN ANCIENT WORSHIPS. Canesa, THE GOD OF WISDOM, IN THE HINDU PANTHEON. ANCIENT SYMBOL WORSHIP. INFLUENCE OF THE PHALLIC IDEA IN THE Religions of Antiquity. BY H ODDER M WESTROPP AND C. STANILAND WAKE. WITH AN INTRODUCTION, ADDITIONAL NOTES, AND AN APPENDIX. By ALEXANDER WILDER, M.D. SECOND EDITION, ILLUSTRATED. NEW YORK: J. W. BOUTON, 706 BROADWAY. 1875- Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1874, By JAMES W. BOUTON, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. PREFACE. The historian Gibbon has remarked that " a lively desire of knowing and recording our ancestors so generally prevails, that it must depend on the influence of some common principle in the minds of men." To this we are probably to refer the inquisi- tiveness that leads individuals to the investigation of the relics of bygone periods, whether as naturalists, philologists, or his- torical inquirers. The Book of Genesis has been eagerly scruti- nized as containing a divinely-inspired record of the Origin of Mankind ; and ancient histories are carefully turned over in quest of clews in the same direction. The studies of language and etymology are interesting as affording traces of the ancestry of our modern peoples. The same plea holds good in regard to religious inquiry. Language and worship are crystallized history. Unbecoming alike are the supercilious disdain and the sancti- monious contempt flung by pretentious men upon ancient ideas and usages. The ignorant cock that scorned the jewel because he knew not how to ascertain its value, and preferred the corn which he could scratch out from the dunghill, is an apt likeness of such persons. It is certainly proper to pay due regard to utility and present advantage. But the disposition to confine the attention to that limit is as imbruting and sensual as anything in fetish- worship or the orgies of the old-time divinities. The generous mind will cast aside such a temper, and, in obedience to its own instincts, hasten to broader fields of exploration, whether in natural science, metaphysical inquiry, or archaeological investiga- tion. Labor which makes a person better acquainted with himself or his fellow-men is not wasted. In former periods it was the practice to check exuberant vi Preface. curiosity by destroying records, and inflicting summary penal- ties on those who exceeded the bounds that had been set to scientific and literary pursuits. Cardinal Ximenes burned the old Arabic manuscripts ; GaUleo languished in prison ; Socrates drank the hemlock, and Servetus perished at the stake ; the Gauls destroyed the annals of Old Rome, and the Romans those of ancient Carthage and Spain ; the Brahmins were alike maUg- nant to the population and literature of Hindustan, and the Moslems equally destructive to the books that fell in their way from Benares and Bactria to Syria and Alexandria. All hoped in this way to put an end to the supremacy of .scholars and rival nations, and to confine thought to the metes and limits of re- ligious orthodoxy. They succeeded for a time, but only par- tially. Knowledge extinguished in one place broke forth in another ; and every nation that burned records and slaughtered teachers speedily declined into insignificance. At the present time the Index Expurgatorius of the Vatican, so far from excluding books from general reading, has become the best medium for advertising them ; and the achievements of Omar at Alexandria, Nabonasar at Babylon, and Torquemeda at Sa,lamanca, to be successful, would require a general holocaust. Those who pro- test against scientific and archeeological studies as tending to unsettle the mind in regard to accepted doctrines, are speaking too late. Devotion which is born of ignorance is not worthy of being cherished. Nevertheless, there is little ground for apprehension that the foundations of a genuine religious belief will be undermined. The investigation of the beginnings of a religion is never the work of infidels, but of the most reverent and conscientious minds. Those who are at liberty to develop themselves freely, will seldom molest themselves about the opinions of others. Mystics and philosophers do not clash, but often arrive at like conclusions by different routes and the exercise of different faculties of mind. The papers of Messrs. Westropp and Wake, showing the influ- Preface. vii ence of " pliallism" upon former religious ideas, are entitled to a candid and careful perusal. The ripe scholarship of those gen- tlemen is beyond question ; and the fidelity with which they performed their labor is worthy of praise. They have treated the subject with a delicacy that is commendable, and with a dignity and fairness characteristic of the scholar and the sage. Their purpose, as will be perceived, is not merely to portray its features, but to exhibit it in its relations to modem idea. This much is claimed especially for the investigations noted in these pages. Whatever may be thought of the men who, accord- ing to our modern notions, took such extraordinary views of divine things and resorted to what would be regarded as offen- sive methods to express them, it is certain nevertheless that in important respects they were equal, if not superior, to the fore- most thinkers of our boasted nineteenth century. Our archi- tects learned of them how to build ; and they possessed accurate scientific knowledge. Our theories of government, modes of inquiry, and even our religious opinions, were derived from the same sources. If we have degraded the ideas which they cher- ished with reverence, if we have rendered obscene the mysteries of hfe which they adored as pure and instituted by God himself let us not add to the injury by endeavoring to cast upon them the reproach which belongs to those who thus calumniate them. Herein, it may be, the ancients have us at disadvantage. They worshipped the Supreme Being as the Father of men, and saw no impurity in the symbolism of parentage to indicate the work of creation. What is divine to be and to do cannot be im- modest and wicked to express. No man born of woman can with decency impugn the operation of that law to which he owes his existence ; and he is impious beyond others who regards that law as only sensual. We may easily perceive how the phallic emblems were adopted to denote the kinship of mankind to the Creator. Those who employed them apprehended no wrong in so doing, till impurity of life had caused all that related to the subject to be considered as indecorous. viii Preface. In these pages the endeavor has been to discourse of the sev- eral topics without levity or discourtesy toward any individual or people. There may be views taken which differ essentially from those commonly entertained, but there is no design to treat any person, topic, or opinion with disrespect. It will also be seen, from the references, that the facts here presented have generally been long familiar to the educated pubUc. The subject is inter- esting, not merely because of its peculiar character, but as afford- ing more complete views of ethnology, as well as of the earlier de- velopment of religious thought. Nothing of value can be lost, and much will be gained in every way, by investigation pursued with candor and dispassionately. INTRODUCTION. Baal None older is than I. When Man came forth. The final effort, wrung from monstrous forms. And Earth's outwearied forces could no more, I warmed the ignorant bantling on my breast. We rose together, and my kingdom spread From these cold hills to hamlets in the palms. That grew to Memphis and to Babylon : While I on towers and hanging terraces. In shaft and obelisk, beheld my sign Creative, shape of first imperious law. "Masque of the Gods,^' by Bavard Taylor. The classic scholar whose studies have hardly exceeded the limits prescribed in the curriculum of the universities, and the biblical student whose explorations of the Hebrew Scriptures have not led him beyond the field of exegesis and theological pursuit, are ill-prepared to hear of a larger world than Greece, .Rome, and Palestine, or of an archaic time which almost remands the annals of those countries into the domain of modern history. Olympian Zeus with his college of associate deities, afterward Latinized into Jupiter and his divine subordinates, and the Lord alone with his ten thousands of sacred ones, comprise their idea of the supernal world and its divinities. Beyond, they recognize a vague and misty chaos of mythologies, which, not accurately under- standing, they superciliously affect to despise. Whoever would be really intelligent, must boldly explore that chaos, voyaging through the " outer world " away from Troy and Greece, as far as Ulysses went, and from biblical scenes to the very heart of the ancient empires. There is no occasion for terror, like that displayed by the mariners who sailed with Columbus into the unknown ocean. Wherever man is to be found, like instincts, passions, hopes, and ambitions will attest a common kindred. Each person's life is in some manner repeated in that of his fellows, and every human soul is a mirror in which other souls, as well as future and former events, reflect their image. It is more than probable that the diversified customs, insti- tutions, and religions of the several nations of the world are less I 10 Introduction. dissimilar in their origin than is often imagined. The differences uprose in the progress of time, the shifting scenes of climate, condition, and event. But the original ideas of existence, and the laws which pertain to all created things, are p.retty much the same among the various tribes of mankind. The religions, philo- sophical systems and symbolisms, are outgrowths, — the aspirations of thinking and reverential men to solve and express in suitable form the facts which underlie and constitute all things. We should therefore approach the subject of human faith and worship with candor, modesty, and respect. Men's beliefs are entitled to so much. The unwitting individual may be astonished at beholding men, the masters of the science and thought of their time, adoring gods that are represented as drunken and adulter- ous, and admitting extravagant stories and scandalous narrations among their religious verities. In his simplicity he may conceive that he has a right to contemn, and even to scoff at, such pro- digious infatuation. But the infatuation and absurdity are only apparent. There is a fuller, profounder meaning, which sanctifies the emblems and legends which ignorant and superficial men de- nounce. M. R6nan speaks justly as well as eloquently: "It is sacrilege, in a religious light, this making sport of symbols con- secrated by Time, wher^ein, too, man had deposited his first views of the divine world." * Religions were never cunningly devised by priests, or ambitious leaders, for the purpose of enabling them to hold the human mind in abject bondage. Nor did they come into existence, full-grown, like Athen6, the Jove-born ; nor were they constructed from the lessons of sages or even of prophets. They were born, like men, not mature. but infantile; the body and life as a single entity, without a definite evolving of the interior, symbolized idea, yet containing all potentially ; so that time and growth were required to enable the intelligent mind to distinguish rightly between the form and the substance which it envelops and shadows forth. When this substance, like tlie human soul, has fully developed, the external forms and symbols become of little value, and are cast off and rejected like chaff from the wheat. Yet for the sake ■ of their use they are to be valued and respected. The well- thinking medical student never indulges in ribald hilarity at or in the presence of the corpse which he dissects, from reverence for * tltudes cTHistoire Religieuse, Frothingham's translation. Introduction. il the human soul that was once its tenant. But religious symbols lose their sacredness when they are employed to supplant the idea which alone had rendered them valuable. Let there be no contempt, then, for the Children of the Mist, who love to gaze backward into the past to ascertain what man has been, and to look within to learn what he is and ought to be. They are not prophets without inspiration, or apostles that have no mission. Behind the vail is the Shekinah ; only the anointed have authority to lift aside the curtain. Modern science somewhat audaciously has endeavored to set aside the time-honored traditions of a Golden Age. ' We do not undertake to controvert the new doctrine, so necessary to estab- lish the recently-traced relationships between men and monkeys. The same social law which allows every man to choose his own company, can be extended perhaps to the selection of his kindred. But, so far as we are able to perceive, there have been cycles of human development, analogous to the geological periods, that have been accomplished upon the earth. Men, nations, and civilizations, like the seasons, have passed over the great theatre of existence. We have often only the traces of them in a few remains of language, manufacture, and religion. Much is lost save to conjecture. Judging from our later observations of human progress, there must have been a long term of discipline that schooled them ; yet, perhaps, it was the divine intuition and instinct implanted in them that enabled them to achieve so much. It is not possible, however, to extend researches back far enough to ascertain. We are not equal to the task of de- scribing the fossils of a perished world. We are compelled to read the archaic history through the forms and mysteries * of * By mysteries the educated reader will not understand merely doctrines or symbols, or even secrets as such, but a system of discipline and instruction in esoteric learning which was deemed too sacred and recondite for those who had not complied with the essential conditions. Every ancient country had its sacerdotal order, the members of which had been initiated into the mys- teries; and even Jesus defended his practice of discoursing in parables or allegories, because that only to his disciples was it given to understand the mysteries of the kingdom of God, whereas to the multitude it was not given. The priests of Egypt, the Magians of the ancient countries beyond the river Euphrates, the priests of Phoenicia and the other countries of West- ern Asia, were all members of sacerdotal colleges that might not divulge the esoteric knowledge to the uninitiated. Even the Brahmins of India are said 12 Introduction. religion, and the peculiarities of language, rather than in the pages of the annalist. The amber of mythology has served to preserve to us the most of what is to be learned on these topics. The primitive religion of mankind is perhaps only to be ascer- tained when we know accurately their original habitats. But this, like the gilded butterfly, eludes our search. India, Persia, Baby- lonia, Syria, Phoenicia, Egypt, were but colonies. The Vendidad indicates a country north of the river Oxus ; and Sir William Jones, adopting the story of the learned Sufi, Mohsan Fani, declared his belief that a powerful monarchy once existed there long before the Assyrian empire ; the history of which was engrafted upon that of the Hindoos, who colonized the country between the river Indus and the Bay of Bengal. In conformity with the views of this writer, Sir William accordingly describes the prime- val religion of Iran and the Aryan peoples as consisting of " a firm belief that One Supreme God made the world by his power and continually governed it by his providence : — a pious fear, love, and adoration of him ; — a due reverence for parents and aged persons ; a paternal affection for the whole human species, and a compassionate tenderness even for the brute creation." But, however much of truth there may be in this description, it evidently relates only to the blonde races. We see plainly enough the engrafting of " history," or rather legends, in many other countries, as well as among the Brahmins of India. The Hebrew records, tracing their patriarchs to Egypt and Assyria, are prob- to have also their mysteries at the present time ; and the late Godfrey Hig- gins relates that a Mr. Ellis was enabled, by aid of the masonic tokens, to enter the penetralia of a temple in the presidency of Madras. That there is some such " freemasonry " existing in many of the countries which we denom- inate, uncivilized and pagan, is probable. The early Christians and heretical sects had also their signs of recognition, and were distinguished lilce the ini- tiates of the older worships, according to their grade, as neophytes (i Tim- othy iii. 6), spiritual, and perfect. The mysteries most familiar to classical readers are the Eleusinia, which appear to have descended firom the pre- historic periods. Pococke declares them to have been of Tartar origin, which is certainly plausible, and to have combined Brahminical and Bud- dhistical ideas. Those admitted only to the Lesser Mysteries were denomi- nated Mystis, or vailed ; those initiated into the Greater Mysteries were epoptai, or seers. Socrates was not initiated, yet after drinking the hemlock he addresses Crito : " We owe a cock to ^sculapius." This was the peculiar offering made by initiates on the eve of the last day, and he thus sublimely asserted that he was about to receive the great apocalypse. Introduction. 13 ably no exception. The Garden of Eden appears to have been well known to the king of Tyre (Ezekiel xxviii. 13-16), who is styled " the anointed cherub ; " the Assyrian is also described (xxxi. 3-18) as a cedar in Lebanon, " fair by the multitude of his branches, so that all the trees of Eden that were in the garden of God envied him ; " and Pharaoh, king of Egypt, is also assured that he shall " be brought down with the trees of Eden into the nether parts of the earth.'' From that region Abraham is reputed to have emigrated, and its traditions are probably therefore consecrated as religious legends. If we had time and space to follow this subject, we might be able to show that the period when the Hebrew patriarch is sup- posed to have removed from the region of the Upper Euphrates, revolutions were occurring there which changed the structure of society. "Your fathers,'' said Joshua to the assembled Israelites, " your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham and the father of Nahor ; and they served other gods." * The Persian legend of " Airyana-vaeja, of the good creation which Anra-mainyas (Ahriman) full of death filled with evils,'' f and the Hebrew story of the garden of Eden J which was by the headwaters of the Oxus, Tigris, and Euphrates, where dwelt the man and the woman till the successful invasion of the Serpent, indicate the Great Religious War of which traditions exist in the principal countries of ancient time. It occurred between the nations of the East and the nations of the West, the Iranians and Turanians, the Solar and Lunar nations, the Lin- gacitas and the Yonijas, those who venerated images and religious symbols, and those who discarded them. Vast bodies of men were compelled to abandon their homes, many of them skilled in the arts of civilization and war. Tribes and dynasties emi- grated to escape slavery and destruction ; and other chmates received and cherished those who had been deemed unworthy to live. These events are superimposed upon the history of every people. Whether the migration mentioned by Juno of the gens inimica, the Trojans, from Troy to Italy, bearing its political genius and conquered divinities, depicts any actual occurrence, we do not undertake to say ; but convulsions did take place, by which peoples once living as one nation, the Hindoos and Per- sians, Greeks and Romans, Germans and Slaves, were divided * Joshua xxiv. 2. f Vendidad, i. 5-12. % Genesis ii. and UL 14 Introduction. from each other and removed to other regions. The Ethiopian or Hamitic races underwent a like overturning and dispersion, probably from their contests with the blonde invaders of the North. Thus, the second chapter of Genesis describes the river Pison, as compassing the land of Ethiopia or Cush, which was evidently situated upon the Erythraean or Arabian Sea. The people of this region appear to have occupied or colonized India, Babylonia, Arabia, Syria, Egypt, and other countries of the West. They were the builder-race par excellence ; and carried civilization, architecture, mathematical science, their arts and political institutions wherever they went. Their artisans, doubt- less, erected the temples and pyramids of Egypt, India, and Babylon ; excavated the mountain of Ellora, the islands of Sal- sette and Elephanta, the artificial caves of Bamian, the rocks of Petra and the hypogea of Egypt ; built the houses of Ad in Arabia, the Cyclopean structures of India, Arabia, and the more western countries ; constructed ships for the navigation of the seas and oceans, and devised the art of sculpture. Mathematics and astronomy, alphabetical as well as hieroglyphical writing, and many other sciences, perhaps those which have been dis- covered in later times, were possessed and cultivated by these " blameless Ethiopians,* most ancient of men." The Hebrew Scriptures, which have been regarded as especially the oracles of religious truth, develop the fact, as has been al- ready suggested, of a close resemblance of the earlier Israelites with the surrounding nations. Their great progenitor, Abraham, is described as emigrating from the region of Chaldea, at the ^junction of the Tigris and Euphrates, in the character of a dis- senter from the religion of that country, f Yet he and his imme- * The term Ethiopian cannot be regarded, when applied to any ancient people, as indicating negro or negroid origin. Like other names, it had a religious meaning, and was applied to Zeus or Jupiter, and also to Prome- theus. The best-defined opinion connects it with the serpent-worship, which prevailed, along with that of the lingam, among the Cushite and kindred peoples. It is noticeable that ethnology has given the Chinese and Mon- golian tribes a world apart. There seems to be a wall between them and the populations of other climates. The Chinese nevertheless manifested themselves occasionally tpon the surface of Asiatic history ; and the Tartars have often appeared as invaders and conquerors, designated in the metaphors and allegories of the old languages, as floods of waters, destroying the world. \ Joshua xxiv. 2, 3. P X fi « s H O < O D z; Introduction. iS ciate descendants appear to have at least employed the same re- ligious symbols and forms of worship as the people of Canaan and Phcenicia, who are recorded to have already occupied Pales- tine.* He erected altars wherever he made a residence ; and " planted agrove " or pillar in Beer-sheba, as a religious emblem.f He is also represented as conducting his son to the land of Moriah, to immolate him as a sacrifice to the Deity, as was some- times done by the Phoenicians ; and as was afterwards authorized in the Mosaic law.J One of the suffets, or judges, Jephthah the Gileadite, in like manner sacrificed his own daughter.at Mizpeh ; § and the place where Abraham built his altar was afterwards selected as the site for the temple of Solomon. || Jacob is twice mentioned as. setting up a pillar, calling the place Beth-el, Tf and as making libations. On the occasion also of forming a treaty of amity with his father-in-law, Laban, the Syrian, he erected a pillar and directed his brethren to pile up a cairn, or heap of stones ; to which were applied the names Galeed, or circle, and Mizpeh, or pillar. Monoliths, or " great stones," appear to have been as common in Palestine as in other countries, and the cairns and circles (gilgals) were equally so, as well as the mounds or "high places." The suffets** or "judges," and the kings, main- tained them till Hezekiah. Samuel the prophet worshipped at a high place at Ramah, and Solomon at the "great stone," or high place in Gibeon.ff There were also priests, JJ and we suspect kadeshim, stationed at them. At Mizpeh, probably at the pillar, was a seat of government of the Israelites ; and Joshua set up a pillar under the oak of Shechem, by the sanctuary. Jephthah the judge made his residence at the former place, and his daugh- * Genesis xii. 6 ; xiii. 7- •|- Genesis xxi. 33. % Leviticus xxvii. 28, 29. § Judges xi. 30, 31, and 34-40. I 2 Chronicles iii. i. Tf Genesis xxxviii. 18-22 ;xxxv. 1-15. ** Tlie suffet was a magistrate under the Phcenician system, as is observed at Carthage. The patriarchal government was that of sheiks, as among the nomadic Arabs, while the Israelites of Goshen and the desert are described 'as being organized like the' Arabs of the towns. \\ I Kings iii. 4. See also ch. xv. 14; xv. 14; xv. 14; xxii. 43. 2 Kings xii. 2 ; xiv. 4 ; xv. 4. \\ 2 Kings xxiii. 9. i6 Introduction. ter, the Iphigenia of the Book of Judges, was immolated there. Samuel was also inaugurated there as suffet of Israel. There were other " great stones " mentioned, as Abel,, Bethshemesh or Heliopolis ; Ezel, where David met with Jonathan ; and Eben- ezer, erected by Samuel on the occasion of a victory over the Philistines. But Hezekiah appears to have changed the entire Hebrew religious polity. He removed the Hermaic or Dionysiac statues, and the conical omphalic emblems of Venus-Ashtoreth ; over- threw the mounds and altars, and broke in pieces the serpent of brass made by Moses, to which the people had burned incense " unto those days." Josiah afterwards also promulgated the law of Moses, and was equally iconoclastic. He removed the para- phernalia of the worship of the sun, destroyed the image of Semel, or Hermes, expelled the kadeshim, or consecrated men and women, from the cloisters of the Temple, and destroyed the statutes and emblems of Venus and Adonis. * We have suggested that Abraham was represented in the char- acter of a dissenter from the worship prevailing at " Ur of the Khasdim." As remarked on a subsequent page by Mr. Wake, " that some great religious movement, ascribed by tradition to Abraham, did take place among the Semites at an early date, is undoubted." It may have been the " Great Religious War." The religion of the patriarchs appears to have had some affinity with that of the Persians, insomuch that some writers intimate an identity of origin. This was certainly the case at a later period. Other peoples were also driven to emigration. Many Scythian nations abandoned their former seats. The Phoeni- cians left their country on the Erythrean Sea, and emigrated to the shores of the Mediterranean. The Pali, or shepherds on the Indus, removed to the west. A part of the population of Asiatic Ethiopia, or Beluchistan, it is supposed, also emigrated. The Hyk-sos,f during the Sixth Dynasty of the Old Monarchy, * 2 Kings xxiii. 4-20. ■)• Manetho translates this term, from the "sacred language," kingly shep- herds ; hyk signifying king, and sos a shepherd. He seems to hesitate, how- ever, for he also remarks that " some say that they were Arabians," and that " in the sacred books they were also styled captives." Shos signifies Arabian, and sus a horse. Are we not allowed to suppose them to be shepherds as rearing and using horses ? They appear to have introduced the horse into Egypt, which makes this idea seem plausible. Introduction. 17 appeared in Egypt. Josephus, abandoning his own history of Jewish Antiquities, construes the account by Manetho, in regard to them, as relating to the ancient Hebrews, remarking: "Our ancestors had the dominion over their country.'' * If we might interpret the story of Abraham and other patriarchs as we would the traditions of o'ther nations, we would assign to it a religious or esoteric meaning rather than a secular and historical one, and fix a later period for the beginning of the authentic annals. The early association of the Shemitic with the Ethiopian nations, how- ever, appears to be abundantly corroborated by profane as well as sacred history. Similarity of customs indicate that the " chosen people," if they had a separate political existence, were in other respects substantially like the earlier nations. We may expect to find these resemblances close enough to show even a family likeness. Of course, every intelligent reader is aware that the Hamitic and Shemitic populations of Asia, Africa, and Europe, belonged to what is denominated the Caucasian or Indo-Germanic race. The earliest deity of the Ethiopian or Hamitic nations, whose worship was most general, was the one known in the Bible by the designation of Baal. He bore, of course, a multiplicity of titles, which were often personified as distinct tiTibx aleim, or divinities ; besides having in Syria a separate name for every season of the year. In the Sanscrit language he was styled Maha Deva, or Supreme God ; and after the Aryan conquest, was added to the Brahmin Trimourti under the title Siva. Other names are easily traced in the Hamitic languages ; as Bala in Bel, the tutelar deity of Babylon ; Deva Nahusha, or Dionysus, of Arabia and Thrace ; Iswara, or Oseiris, of Egypt. In western mythology he become more generally known through the Phoe- nicians. In Tyre he was Mel-karth, the lord of the city ; in Syria he was Adonis and Moloch ; but all through Europe he is best known by the hero-name Hercules. His twelve labors typify the sun passing through the signs of the zodiac ; his con- quests in the west show whither the Phoenician navigators di- rected their course ; while the maypoles, Bal-fires, and other remnants of old worships, exist as his memorials. The story of his achievements is a fair outline of the history of Phcenician adventure. * Against Afion, i. 25. 1 8 Introduction. " The wonderful and universal power of light and heat," says that most modest and amiable writer, Mrs.Lydia Maria Child,* "has caused the Sun to be worshipped as a visible emblem of deity in the infancy of nearly all nations. Water is recognized as another obvious symbol of divine influence. Hence the sacred rivers, fountains, and wells abounding in Hindostan. The Air is likewise to them a consecrated emblem. Invisible, pervad- ing all space, and necessary to the life of all creatures, it naturally suggests the spirit of God. Nearly all languages de- scribe the soul by some phrase similar in signification to ' the breath of life.' Brahm is sqmetimes called Alma, or the Breath- ing Soul. " Other emblems deemed sacred by the Hindoos, and wor- shipped in their temples, have brought upon them the charge of gross indecency. But if it be true at the present time, it prob- ably was not so at the beginning. When the world was in its infancy, people spoke and acted with more of the -simplicity and directness of little children than they do at present. In the in- dividual child, and in the childhood of society, whatever is incom- prehensible produces religious awe. As the reflective faculties develop, man is solemnly impressed with the wonders of creation, in the midst of which his soul wakes up, as it were, from a dream. And what so miraculous as the advent of this conscious soul into the marvellous mechanism of a human body? If Light with its grand revealings, and Heat making the earth fruitful with beauty, excited wonder and worship in the fif st inhabitants of our world, is it strange that they likewise regarded with reverence the great mystery of human Birth ? Were they impure thus to regard it ? Or, are we impure that we do not so regard it ? We have travelled far, and unclean have been the paths, since those old anchorites first spoke of God and the soul in the solemn depths of their first sanctuaries. Let us not smile at their mode of tracing the Infinite and Incomprehensible Cause throughout all the mysteries of Nature, lest by so doing we cast the shadow of our own grossness on their patriarchal simplicity. " From time immemorial, an emblem has been worshipped in Hindostan as the type of creation,f or the origin of life. It * Progress of Religious Ideas through Successive Ages. Vol. I, pp. 15, 16, 17. \ The first verse of the Book of Genesis declares creation to have been a Introduction. 19 is the most common symbol of Siva [Baal or Maha Deva], and is universally connected with his worship. To understand the original intention of this custom, we should remember that Siva was not merely the reproducer of human forms ; he rep- resented the Fructifying Principle, the Generating Power that pervades the universe, producing sun, moon, stars, men, animals, and plants. , The symbol to which we have alluded is always in his temples. It is usually placed in the inmost recess, or sanc- tuary, sculptured in granite, marble, or ivory, often crowned with flowers, and surmounted by a golden star. Lamps are kept burning before it, and on festival occasions it is illuminated by a lamp with seven branches, supposed to represent the planets. * Small images of this emblem, carved in ivory, gold, or crystal, are often worn as ornaments about the neck. The pious use them in their prayers, and often have them buried with them. Devotees of Siva have it written on their foreheads in the form of a perpendicular mark. The maternal emblem is likewise a religious type ; and worshippers of Vishnu represent it on their forehead by a horizontal mark, with three short perpendicular lines." These symbols are found in the temple-excavations of the islands of Salsette and Elephanta, of unknown antiquity ; in the grotto-temples of EJlora, at the "Seven Pagodas" on the Coromandel coast, in the old temple at Tanjore, and elsewhere, where Siva-worship is in the ascendant. Although these symbols, the lingam and yoni, have been adopted by the Brahmins, there is little harmony between the Lingayats and Vishnavites. " In the sacrifice of Wisdom," says Daksha, " no Brahmin is wanted to officiate." The Rig- Veda denounces the "lascivious wretch- es " who adore the sexual emblems, in such language as this : "Let not the lascivious wretches approach our sacred rites, f "The irresistible [Indra] overcame the lascivious wretches." In her chapter on Egypt, Mrs. Child again remarks : " Because plants cannot germinate without water, vases full of it were series of Toledoth, or generations. It is properly translated.' "God (the Aleun) engendered (B'RA) the heavens and the earth." * The seven-branched candlestick of the Mosaic tabernacle has here its pro- totype. f Rig- Veda, vii. 21:5; and x. 99 : 3. The term used is Sisna-devas, or phallus-gods. 20 Introduction. carried at the head of processions in honor of Oseiris, and his votaries refrained from destroying or polluting any spring. This reverence for the production of Life, introduced into his worship the sexual emblems so common in Hindostan. A colossal image of this kind was presented to his temple in Alexandria, by King Ptolemy Philadelphus. Crowned with gold and surmounted by a golden star, it was carried in a splendid chariot in the midst of religious processions. A serpent, the emblem of Immortality, always accompanies the image of Oseiris." . . . " Reverence for the mystery of organized life led to the recog- nition of a mascuUne and feminine principle in all things spiritual or material. Every elemental force was divided into two, the parents of other forces. The active wind was masculine, the passive mist, or inert atmosphere, was feminine. Rocks were masculine, the productive earth was feminine. The presiding deity of every district \nome\ was represented as a Triad or Trinity. At Thebes it was Amun, the creative Wisdom ; Neith, the spiritual Mother; and a third, supposed to represent the Universe. At Philae it was Oseiris, the generating Cause ; Isis, the receptive Mould, and Horus, the Result. The sexual em- blems everywhere conspicuous in the sculptures of their temples would seem impure in description, but no clean and thoughtful mind could so regard them while witnessing the obvious simplicity and solemnity with which the subject is treated." "All the idolaters of that day," says Colonel Tod,* seem to have, held the grosser tenets of Hinduism. . . When Judah did evil in the sight of the Lord, and ' built them high places and images and groves [mounds, hermaic pillars, and omphalic statues] on every high hill and under every green tree,' the object was Bal ; and the pillar (the lingam, matzebah or phallus) was his symbol, t It was on his altar that they burned incense, and ' sacrificed unto the Calf on the fifteenth day of the eighth month,' the sacred Amavus of the Hindus. The Calf of Israel is the Bull (nanda) of Balc6sar or Iswara, the Apis of the Egyp- tian Oseiris. . . Mahadeva, or Iswara, is the tutelary divinity of the Rajpoots in Mewar, and from the early annals of the dynasty appears to have been, with his consort Isa, the sole object of * Rajasthan^ vol. i. , 76-79. f I Kings xiv. 22. The introduction of kadeshimy or persons consecrated and set apart, like nautch-girls, or almas, is first mentioned in this connection. Introduction . 2 1 Gehlote adoration. Iswara is adored under the epithet of Ek- ■linga, and is either worshipped in his monolithic symbol, or as Iswara Chaomukhi, the quadriform divinity represented by a bust with four faces." These spectacles, however, were regarded as sacred, and few regarded them as possessing moral turpitude. "This worship was so general as to have spread itself over a large part of the habitable globe ; for it flourished for many ages in Egypt and Syria, Persia, Asia Minor, Greece, and Italy ; it was and still is in vigor in India and many parts of Africa, and was even found in America on its discovery by the Spaniards." * Being regarded as the most sacred objects of worship, and consecrated by religion, the cultus was associated with every idea and sentiment which was regarded as ennobling to man. The reflecting men of all the older ages, down to Plato, Plotinus, lamblichus, and the followers of the Gnosis, all paid like respect to the great arcanum of life and of Man. We need not look superciliously upon their veneration ; for however different our modes of thought, however exaggerated above theirs our fasti- diousness, we cannot escape the same problems which they thus labored to solve, nor the necessity to realize the vailing and the apocalypse which the symbols and the mysteries foreshadowed. * Aphrodisiacs and Anti- Aphrodisiacs. Three Essays on the Powers of Reproduction, with some Account of the Judicial " Congress," as practised in France during the Seventeenth Century. By John Davenport. Small quarto, with eight full-page illustrations. London, i86g. PHALLIC WORSHIP.* BY HODDER M. WESTROPP. Human Nature is the same in all climes ; and the workings of this same human nature are almost identical in the different stages of its growth. Hence similar and analogous ideas, beliefs, and superstitious practices are fre- quently evolved independently among different peoples. These are the result of suggestions arising spontaneously in the human mind at certain stages of its development, and which seem almost universal. As a remarkable instance, of this, I have drawn up the following sketch of phallic worship, which was one of those beliefs or superstitious practices which have sprung up independently, and which seem to have extensively prevailed among many nations. It will acquire additional interest when it is considered that it is the most ancient of the superstitions of the hu- man race, that it has prevailed more or less among all known people in ancient times, and that it has been handed down even to a very late and Christian period. In the earlier ages the operations of nature made a stronger impression on the minds of men. Those ideas, springing from the coristant observation of the modes of acting in nature, were consequently more readily suggested to the minds of all races of men in the primitive ages. Two causes must have forcibly struck the minds of men in those early periods when observant of the operations of nature, one the generative power, and the other the pro- ductive, the active and passive causes. This double mode * A paper read before the Anthropological Society of London, April 5th, 1870. 24 Phallic Worship. of production visible in nature must have given rise to comparisons with the mode of proceeding in the genera- tion of animals, in which two causes concur, the one act- ive and the other passive, the one male and the other female, the one as father, the other as mother. These ideas were doubtless suggested independently and sponta- neously in different countries ; for the human mind is so constituted that the same objects and the same operations of nature will suggest like ideas in the minds of men of all races, however widely apart. Nature to the early man was not brute matter, but a be- ing invested with his own personality, and endowed with the same feelings, passions, and performing the same ac- tions. He could only conceive the course of nature from the analogy to his own actions. Generation, begetting — production, bringing forth — were thus his ideas of cause and effect. The earth was looked upon as the mould of nature, as the recipient of seeds, the nurse of what was produced in its bosom ; the sky was the fecundating and fertilizing power. An analogy was suggested in the union of the male and female. These comparisons are found in ancient writers. " The sky," Plutarch says, "appeared to men to perform the functions of a father, as the earth those of a mother. The sky was the ftither, for it cast seed into the bosom of the earth, which in receiving them became fruitful and brought forth, and was the mother." This union has been sung in the following verses by Virgil : "Turn pater omnipotens fecundis imbribis aether Conjugis in gremium Isetse descendit." — Geor. ii. Columella has related, in his treatise on agriculture, the loves of nature, or the marriage of heaven and earth, which takes place in the spring of the year. These ideas bear a prominent part in the religious creeds of several nations. In Egypt the Deity or principle of generation was Khem, called " the father " — the abstract idea of father ; as the goddess Maut was that of mother. The office of Khem was not confined to the procreation Phallic Worship. 25 and continuation of the human species, but extended even to the vegetable world, over which he presided, when we find his statue accornpanied by trees and plants ; and kings offering to him herbs of the ground, cutting the corn before him, or employed in his presence tilling the land, and preparing it to receive the generating influence of the deity. In the Saiva Purana of the Hindoos, Siva says : "From the supreme spirit proceed Purusha (the generative or male principle), Prakriti (the productive or female princi- ple), and Tirue ; and by them was produced this universe, the manifestation of the one god. . . . Of all organs of sense and intellect, the best is mind, which proceeds from Ahankara, Ahankara from intellect, intellect from the su- preme being, who is, in fact, Purusha. It is the primeval male, whose form constitutes the universe, and whose breath is the sky ; and though incorporeal, that male am I." In the Kritya Tatwa, Siva is thus addressed by Brahma: "I know that Thou, O Lord, art the eternal Brahm, that seed which, being received in the womb of thy Sakti (aptitude to conceive), produced this universe ; that thou united with thy Sakti dost create the universe from thine own substance like the web from the spider." In the same creed Siva is the personification of the sun (which he is equally with Surya) or fire, the genial heat which pervades, generates and vivifies all ; and Bhavani, who, as the goddess of nature is also the earth, is the uni- versal mother. Among the Assyrians, the supreme god, Bel, was styled " the procreator " ; and his wife, the goddess Mylitta, re- presented the productive principle of nature, and received the title of the queen of fertility. Another deity, the god Vul, the god of the atmosphere, is styled the beneficent chief, the giver of abundance, the lord of fecundity. On Assyrian cylinders he is represented as a phalhc deity. With him is associated a goddess Shala, whose ordinary title is " Sarrat," queen, the feminine of the word " Sar," which means chief. Sir Henry Rawlinson remarks, with regard to the Assyrian San, or Shamas, the sun-god, that 2 26 Phallic Worship. the idea of the motive influence of the sun-god in all human affairs arose from the manifest agency of the material sun in stimulating the functions of nature. In Phoenician mythology, Ouranos (heaven) weds Ghe (the earth), and by her becomes father of Oceanus, Hype- ron, lapetus, Cronos, and other gods. In conformity with the religious ideas of the Greeks and Romans, Virgil describes the products of the earth as the result of the conjugal act between Jupiter (the sky) and Juno (the earth). According to St. Augustin, the sexual organ of man was consecrated in the temple of Liber, that of woman in the sanctuaries of Libera ; these two divinities were named father and mother. In the month of April, when the fertilizing powers of nature begin to operate and its .productive powers to be visibly developed, a festival in honor of Venus took place at Rome ; in it the phallus wa,s carried in a cart, and led in procession by the Roman ladies to the temple of Venus outside the Colline gate, and then presented by them to the sexual parts of the goddess. This is only symbolizing the same idea as expressed by Virgil in the Georgics. We find similar ideas in the religious creeds of America, and of the remote islands of the Pacific Ocean. According to the Indians of Central America, Famagostad and Zipal- tonal, the first male and the second female, created heaven, earth, man, and all things. The Tahitians imagined that everything which exists in the universe proceeds from the union of two beings : one of them was named Taroataihetounou ; the other Tepapa : they were supposed to produce continually and by connec- tion the days and months. Those islanders supposed that the sun and moon, which are gods, had begotten the stars, and that the eclipses were the time of their copulation. A New Zealand myth says we have two primeval an- cestors, a father and a mother. They are rangi and papa, heaven and earth. The earth, out of which all things are produced, is our mother ; the protecting and overruling heaven is our father. Phallic Worship. 27 It is thus evident that the doctrine of the reciprocal principles of nature, or nature active and passive, male and female, was recognized in nearly all the primitive religious systems of the old as well as of the new world, and in none more clearly than in those of Central Amer- ica ; thus proving, not only the wide extent of the doc- trine, but also its separate and independent origin, spring- ing from those innate principles which are common to human nature in all climes and races. Hence the almost universal reverence paid to the images of the sexual parts, as they were regarded as symbols and types of the gen- erative and productive principles in nature, and of those gods and goddesses who were the representatives of the same principles. The Phallus and the Cteis, the Lingam and the Yoni — the special parts contributing to genera- tion and production, becoming thus symbols of those active and passive causes, could not but become objects of reverence and worship. The union of the two symbol- ized the creative energy of all nature ; for almost all prim- itive religion consisted in the reverence and worship paid to nature and its operations. Evidence that this worship extensively prevailed will be found in many countries, both in ancient and modern times. It occurs in ancient Egypt, in India, in Syria, in Babylon, among the Assyrians, in Persia, Greece, Italy, Spain, Germany, Scandinavia, and among the Gauls. In Egypt, the phallus is frequently represented as the sym- bol of generation. According to Ptolemy, the phallus was the object of religious worship among the Assyrians and also among the Persians. In Syria, Baal-Peor was represented with a phallus in his mouth, according to St. Jerome. The Jews did not escape this worship ; and we see their women manufacturing phalli of gold and of sil- ver, as we find in Ezekiel xvi. 17.* Among the Hindoos a religious reverence was paid to the Lingam and Yoni, * "Thou didst take also thy fair jewels of my gold, and didst make to thy- self images of men, and didst commit fornication with them." — Noyes's Translation of Ezekiel. 28 Phallic Worship. and among the Greeks and Romans to the Phallus and Cteis. Among the Teutons and Scandinavians, the god Fricco, corresponding to the Priapus of the Romans, was adored under the form of a phallus ; a similar god under a similar symbol was adored in Spain, whose name was Hortanes. This worship has been found in different parts of Amer- ica, in Mexico, in Peru, at Hayti ; it still prevails at the present day in a great part of India and Thibet. Accord- ing to Mr. Stephens, the upright pillar in front of the temples of Yucatan is a phallus. We read in an ancient document written by one of the companions of Fernando Cortez : "In certain countries, and particularly at Panu- 00, they adore the phallus (il membro che portano gli nomini fra le gambe), and it is preserved in the temples." The inhabitants of Tlascala also paid worship to the sex- ual organs of a man and woman. In Peru, several repre- sentations in clay of the phallus are met with. At Hayti, according to Mr. Artaud, phalli have been discovered in different parts of the island, and are believed to be undoubtedly the manufacture of the original inhabitants of the island. In one of the Marianne islands of the Pacific Ocean, on festive occasions, a phallus, highly orna- mented, called by the natives Tinas, is carried in procession. Among the simple and primitive races of men, the act of generation was considered as no more than one of the operations of nature contributing to the reproduction of the species, as in agriculture the sowing of seed for the production of corn, and was consequently looked upon as a solemn duty consecrated to the Deity ; as Payne Knight remarks, it was considered as a solemn sacrament in honor of the Creator. In those early ages, all the operations of nature were consecrated to some divinity, from whom they were sup- posed to emanate ; thus the sowing of seed was presided over by Ceres. In Egypt, the act of generation was consecrated to Khem ; in Assyria, to Vul ; in India, to Siva ; in Greece, Phallic Worship. 29 in the primitive pastoral age, to Pan ; and in later times, to Priapus ; and in Italy, to Mutinus. Among the Mexi- cans, the god of generation- was named Triazoltenti. These gods became the representatives of the generative or fructifying powers in man and nature. The following curious passage, fromCook's First Voy- age, will show that almost similar views were entertained by a primitive race in the islands of the Pacific Ocean, which must have been suggested independently, from their complete disconnection with the ancient world : " On the 14th I directed that divine service should be performed at the fort : we were desirous that some of the principal Indians should be present, but when the hour came, most of them returned home. Mr. Banks, however, crossed the river, and brought back Tubourai Tamaide and his wife Tomio, hoping that it would give occasion to some inquiries on their part, and some instruction on ours : having seated them, he placed himself between them, and during the whole service, they very attentively observed his behavior, and very exactly imitated it ; standing, sitting, or kneeling, as they saw him do ; they were conscious that we were employed about somewhat serious and important, as appeared by their calling to the Indians without the fort to be silent ; yet when the service was over, neither of them asked any questions, nor would they attend to any attempt that was made to explain what had been done. " Such were our motives; our Indians thought fit to perform vespers of a different kind. A young man, near six feet high, performed the rites of Venus with a little girl about eleven or twelve years of age, before several of our people and a great number of the natives, without the least sense of being indecent or improper ; but, as ap- peared, in perfect conformity to the custom of the place. Among the spectators were several women of superior rank, particularly Oberea, who may properly be said to have assisted at the ceremony." * * Hawkesworth's Voyages^ vol. i. ch. 12. 30 Phallic Worship. The reverence, as well as worship, paid to the phallus in the early ages had nothing in it which partook of in- decency : all ideas connected with it were of a reverential and religious kind. When Abraham, as mentioned in Genesis, in asking his servant to take a solemn oath, makes him lay his hand on his parts of generation (in the common version, "under his thigh" *), it was that he required as a token of his sincerity his placing his hand on the most revered part of his body ; as, at the present day, a man would place his hand on his heart in order to evince his sincerity. Jacob, when dying, makes his son Joseph perform the same act. A similar custom is still retained among the Arabs at the present day. An Arab, in taking a solemn oath, will place his hand on his mem- brum virile in attestation of his sincerity, f The indecent ideas attached to the phallic symbol were, though it seems a paradox to say so, the result of a more advanced civilization verging towards its decline, as we have evidence at Rome and Pompeii. % We may here introduce an extremely just and apposite remark of Constant in his work on Roman polytheism : " Indecent rites may be practised by a religious people with the greatest purity of heart. But when incredulitj has gained a footing among these peoples, these rites become then the cause and pretext of the most revolting corruption." A similar remark has been made by Vol- taire. Speaking of the worship of Priapus, he says, " Our ideas of propriety lead us to suppose that a ceremony which appears to us so infamous could only be invented by licentiousness ; but it is impossible to believe that * The thigh had a peculiar sanctity. It was the part burned of the sacrifi- cial victim as of a sweet savor to the Deity. Bacchus, it will be remembered, was preserved in embryo at the thigh of Jupiter ; and Pythagoras, in his in- itiations, displayed a golden thigh as the last mystery. f Mimoires sur PEgypte, partie deuxifeme, p. 196. X Secret Museum of Nafles; Being an account of the Erotic Paintings, Bronzes, and Statues contained in that famous "Cabinet Secret." By Colonel Fanin. Now first translated from the French. With sixty illustra- tions. 4to, London, 1871. Phallic Worship. 31 depravity of manners would ever have led among any people to the establishment of religious ceremonies. It is probable, on the contrary, that this custom was first introduced in times of simplicity, that the first thought was to honor the deity in the symbol of life which it has given us. Such a ceremony may have excited licentious- ness among youths, and have appeared ridiculous to men of education in more refined, more corrupt, and more enlightened times." Three phases in the representation of the phallus should be distinguished ; first, when it was the object of reverence and religious worship ; secondly, when it was used as a protecting power against evil influences of various kinds, and as a charm or amulet against envy and the evil eye, as at the postern gate at Alatri and at Pom- peii, and as frequently occurs in amulets of porcelain found in Egypt, and of bronze in Italy ; thirdly, when it was the result of mere licentiousness and dissolute morals. Another cause also contributed to its reverence and fre- quent representation — the natural desire of women among all races, barbarous as well as civilized, to be the fruitful mother of children — especially as, among some people, women were esteemed according to the number of chil- dren they bore, and as, among the Mohammedans of the present day, it is sinful not to contribute to the popula- tion ; as a symbol, therefore, of prolificacy, and as the bestower of offspring, the phallus became an object of reverence and especial worship among women. At Pom- peii was found a gold ring, with the representation of the phallus on its bezel, supposed to have been worn by a barren woman. To propitiate the deity and to obtain offspring, offerings of this symbol were made in Roman temples by women, and this custom has been retained in modern times at Isernia, near Naples. Stone offerings of phalli are also made at the present day in a Buddhist temple in Pekin, and for the same object Mohammedan women kiss with reverence the organ of generation of an idiot or saint. In India this worship has found its most 32 Phallic Worship. extensive development. There young girls who are anxious for husbands, and married women who are de- sirous of progeny, are ardent worshippers of Siva ; and his symbol, the lingam, is sometimes exhibited in enor- mous proportions. In the sixteenth century, St. Foutin in the south of France, St. Ters at Antwerp, and in the last century Saints Cosmo and Damiano at Isernia, near Naples, were worshipped for the same purpose by young girls and barren women. Sir Gardner Wilkinson records similar superstitious practices at the present day at Ekhmim in Egypt. The superstitions of the natives here ascribed the same proper- ties to a stone in one of the sheikh's tombs, and likewise to that of the temple of Pan, which the statues of the god of generation, the pati-on deity of Panopolis (Ekhmim), were formerly believed to have possessed ; and the modern women of Ekhmim, with similar hopes and equal credulity, offer their vows to these relics for a numerous progeny. We may conclude with the following passage from Captain Burton, which exhibits similar customs among a rude and barbarous people of the present day : " Among all barbarians whose primal want is progeny, we observe a greater or less development of the phallic worship. In Dahome it is uncomfortably prominent. Every street from Whydah to the capital is adorned with the symbol, and the old ones are not removed. The Dahoman Pria- pus is a clay figure, of any size between a giant and the pigmy, crouched upon the ground, as if contemplating its own attributes. The head is sometimes a wooden block rudely carved, more often dried mud, and the eyes and teeth are supplied by cowries. The tree of life is anointed with palm-oil, which drips into a pot or a shard placed below it, and the would-be mother of children prays that the great god Legba will make her fertile." INFLUENCE OF THE PHALLIC IDEA RELIGIONS OF ANTIQUITY.* BY C. STANILAND WAKE. It will not be necessary for me to give details of the rites by which the phallic superstition is distinguished, as they may be found in the works of Dulaure,t Payne Knight, !j: and other writers. I shall refer to them, there- fore, only so far as may be required for the due under- standing of the subject to be considered — the influence of the phallic idea in the religions of antiquity. The first step in the inquiry is to ascertain the origin of the super- stition in question. Faber ingeniously referred to a primitive universal belief in a great father, the curious connection seen to exist between nearly all non- Christian mythologies, and he saw in phallic worship a degradation of this belief. Such an explanation as this is, however, not satisfactory ; since, not only does it require the as- sumption of a primitive divine revelation, but proof is still wanting that all peoples have, or ever had, any such notion of a great parent of mankind as that supposed to have been revealed. And yet there is a valuable germ of * A paper read before the Anthropological Society of London, April 5th, 1870. f Histoire Abrige de Differens Cultes.^ vol. ii. \ A Discourse on the Worship of Priapus, and its Connection with the Mystic Theology of the Ancients. By Richard Payne Knight, Esq. New Edition. To which is added An Essay on the Worship of the Generative Powers during the Middle Ages of Western Europe. Illustrated with 138 Engravings. 410, London, i86g. 34 Phallism in truth in this hypothesis. The phallic superstition is founded essentially in the family idea. Captain Richard Burton recognized this truth when he asserted that "amongst all barbarians whose primal want is progeny, we observe a greater or less development of the phallic worship." * This view, however, is imperfect. There must have been something more than a mere desire for progeny to lead primitive man to view the generative pro- cess with the peculiar feelings embodied in this supersti- tion. We are, in fact, here taken to the root of all relig- ions — awe at the mysterious and unknown. That which the uncultured mind cannot understand is viewed with dread or veneration, as it may be, and the object present- ing the mysterious phenomenon may itself be worshipped as a fetish, or the residence of a presiding spirit. But there is nothing more mysterious than the phenomena of gen- eration, and nothing more important than the final result of the generative act. Reflection on this result would naturally cause that which led to it to be invested with a certain degree of superstitious significance. The feeling generated would have a double object, as it had a double origin — wonder at the phenomenon itself and a perception of the value of its consequences. The former, which is the most simple, would lead to a veneration for the organs whose operation conduced to the phenomena — hence the superstitious practices connected with the phallus and the yoni among primitive peoples. In this, moreover, we have the explanation of numerous curious facts observed among eastern peoples. Such is the respect shown by women for the generative organ of dervishes and fakirs. f * Memoirs of the Anthropological Society of London, vol. i, p. 320. \ The Vanaprastha were Brahminical anchorites, who inhabited the des- erts, lived on vegetables, devoted themselves to contemplation, macerated the body, fought with devils and giants (as a natural consequence), and were insensible to heat and cold. They were caUed later, by the Greeks, Gymnoso- phists ; and although they went perfectly naked, no throb or involuntary movement was ever seen in any part of their bodies. Women who were bar- ren oftentimes came and touched their shrivelled member, hoping thereby to become fruitful. Not the slightest emotion was noticed at such times. Ancient Religions. 35 Such also is the Semitic custom referred to in the Hebrew Scriptures as " the putting of the hand under the thigh," which is explained by the Talmudists to be the touching of that part of the body which is sealed and made holy by circumcision : a custom which wa.s, up to a recent date, still in use among the Arabs as the most solemn guarantee of truthfulness.* The second phase of the phallic superstition is that which arises from a perception of the value of the conse- quences of the act of generation. The distinction be- tween this and the preceding phase is that, while the one has relation to the organs engaged, the other refers more particularly to the chief agent. Thus, the father of the family is venerated as the generator ; this authority is founded altogether on the act and consequences of gener- ation. We thus see the fundamental importance, as well as the phallic origin, of the family idea. From this has sprung the social organization of all primitive peoples. An instance in point may be derived from Mr. Hunter's account of the Santals of Bengal. He says that the classification of this interesting people among themselves depends, " not upon social rank or occupation, but upon the family basis." This is shown by the character of the six great ceremonies in a Santal's life, which are : " ad- mission into the family ; admission into the tribe ; admis- sion into the race ; union of his own tribe with another by marriage ; formal dismission from the living race by incremation ; lastly, a reunion with the departed fathers. " \ We may judge from this of the character of certain customs which are widespread among primitive peoples, and the phallic origin of which has long been lost sight of. The value set on the results of the generative act The old ascetics would have regarded with contempt the practices of Chris- tian monks, who were indeed children when compared with their Eastern an- cestors. — The Monks before Christ .^ by John Edgar Johnson; and Descrip- tion of the Character, Manners and Customs of the People of India, by Abbe J. A. Dubois. * See Dulaure, op. cit., vol. ii., p. 219. + Rural Bengal, p. 203. 3^ Phallism in would naturally make the arrival at the age of puberty an event of peculiar significance. Hence, we find various cere- monies performed among primitive, and even among civil- ized, peoples at this period of life. Often when the youth arrives at manhood other rites are performed to mark the significance of the event. Marriage, too, derives an importance from its conse- quences which otherwise it would not possess. Thus, among many peoples it is attended with certain cere- monies denoting its object, or, at least, marking it as an event of peculiar significance in the life of the individual, or even in the history of the tribe. The marriage cere- monial is especially fitted for the use of phallic rites or symbolism ; the former, among semi-civilized peoples, often being simply the act of consummation itself, which appears to be looked on as part of the ceremony. The symbolism we have ourselves retained to the present day in the wedding-ring, which must have had a phallic origin, if, as appears probable, it originated in the Samothracian mysteries.* Nor does the influence of the phallic idea end with life. The veneration entertained for the father of the family as the " generator," led in time to peculiar care being taken of the bodies of the dead ; and, finally, to the worship of ancestors, which, under one form or another, distinguished all the civilized nations of antiquity, as it does even now most of the peoples of the heathen world. CIRCUMCISION. There is one phallic rite which, from its nature and wide range, is of peculiar importance. I refer to circum- cision. The origin of this custom has not yet, so far as I am aware, been satisfactorily explained. The idea that, under certain climatic conditions, circumcision is neces- sary for cleanliness and comfort, does not appear to be well-founded, as the custom is not universal even within the tropics. Nor is the reason given by Captain Richard * See Ennemoser's History of Magic (Bohn), vol. ii, p. 33. Ancient Religions. 37 Burton, in his "Notes connected with the Dahoman," for both circumcision and excision, perfectly satisfactory. The real origin of these customs has been forgotten by all peoples practising them ; and, therefore, they have ceased to have their primitive significance. That circumcision, at least, had a superstitious origin may be inferred from the traditional history of the Jews. The old Hebrew writers, persistent in their idea that they were a peculiar people, chosen by God for a special purpose, asserted that this rite was instituted by Jehovah as a sign of the covenant between Him and Abraham. Although we cannot doubt that this rite was practised by the Egyp- tians and Phoenicians long before the birth of Abraham,* yet two points connected with the Hebrew tradition are noticeable. These are, the religious significance of the act of circumcision — it is the sign of a covenant between God and man — and its performance by the head of the family. These two things are, indeed, intimately con- nected ; since, in the patriarchal age, the father was always the priest of the family and the offerer of the sacrifices. We have it, on the authority of the Veda, that this was the case also among the primitive Aryan people. f Abraham, therefore, as the father and priest of the family, performed the religious ceremony of circumcision on the males of his household. Circumcision, in its inception, is a purely phallic rite, having for its aim the marking of that which from its associations is viewed with peculiar veneration, and it connects the two phases of this superstition which have for their object respectively the instrument of generation and the agent. We are thus brought back to the con- sideration of the simplest form of phallic worship, that * Herodotus, Euterfe, § 104. It was a practice at least 2,400 years before our era, and is even then an ancient custom. Nevertheless it appears to have been found only among nations cognate with the Egyptians and the Phoenicians. The neglect of it by Moses and by the Israelites whom he conducted to the border of the land of Canaan, is a strong presumption against its previous employment by the patriarchs. — Ed. \ See Bunsen's God in History, vol. i, p. 299. 38 Phallism in which has reference to the generative organs viewed as the mysterious instruments in the realization of that keen de- sire for children which distinguishes all primitive peoples. This feeling is so nearly universal that it is a matter of surprise to find the act by which it is expressed signalized as sinful. Yet such is the case, although the incidents in which the fact is embodied are so veiled in figure that their true meaning has long been forgotten. Clemens Alexandrinus tells us that " the Bacchanals hold their orgies in honor of the frenzied Bacchus, celebrating their sacred frenzy by the eating of raw flesh, and go through the distribution of the parts of butchered victims, crowned with snakes, shrieking out the name of that Eve, by whom error came into the world." He adds that " the symbol of the Bacchic orgies is a consecrated serpent," and that according to the strict interpretation of the Hebrew term, the name Hevia, aspirated, signifies a female serpent* We have here a reference to the sup- posed fall of man from pristine " innocence," Eve and the serpent being very significantly introduced in close conjunction, and indeed becoming in some sense identi- •fied with each other. In fact the Arabic word for serpent, hayyat, may be said also to mean " life," and in this sense ■the legendary first human mother is called Eve or Chev- vah, in Arabic Hawwa. In its relations, as an asserted fact, the question of the fall has an important bearing on the subject before us. Quite irrespective of the impossi- bility of accepting the Mosaic cosmogony as a divinely inspired account of the origin of the world and man — a cosmogony which, with those of all other Semitic peoples, has a purely "phallic" basis f — the whole transaction said to have taken place in the Garden of Eden is fraught with difficulties on the received interpretation. The very idea on which it is founded — the placing by God, in the way of Eve, of a temptation which He knew she could * Ante-Nicene Christian Library, vol. IV. (Clement of Alexandria), p. 27. t The Hebrew word bara^ translated "created," has also the sense of "begotten." See Gesenius. t-^'re. tyitMiui/er. f^y'rcm lie- cJ&rait'ji. f^i .C/i*tiAtd'Q',et/icey 'J'-i'oniyt/ie^JltcMU of eyVa/u C^mAziC'. c .^'rouvi/ie^^ot'ae t-Jalr//!- SERPENT-SYMBOLS FOUND IN PERSIA, CHINA, AND EGYPT. FIRE ON THE ALTAR AND SER- PENTS REPRESENTING THE TRIAD. THE TRIAD REPRESENTED BY A HUMAN FIGURE AND SER- PENTS. THE TRIAD REPRESENTED BY A HUMAN FIGURE, A CONCHA AND SERPENT. THE TRIAD REPRESENTED BY THE SERPENT, THE CONCHA, AND MATERNAL SYMBOL. THE MITHIAIC FIGURE OF AZON, A HUMAN FIGURE ENCIRCLED WITH A ZONE COMPOUND OF A SERPENT. THE TREE OF WISDOM ENCIR- CLED BY THE SERPENT, SYM- BOLIZING THE MALE AND FE- MALE CREATIVE PRINCIPLES. Ancient Religions. 39 not resist — is sufficient to throw discredit on the ordinary- reading of the narrative. The effect, indeed, that was to follow the eating of the forbidden fruit, appears to an ordinary mind to furnish the most praiseworthy motive for not obeying the command to abstain. That " eating of the forbidden fruit " was simply a figurative mode of expressing the performance of the act necessary to the perpetuation of the human race — an act which in its ori- gin was thought to be the source of all evil — is evident from the consequences which followed, and from the curse ■ it entailed.* As to the curse inflicted on Eve, it has always been a stumbling-block in the way of commentators. For, what connection is there between the eating of a fruit and sorrow in bringing forth children ? The meaning is evi- dent, however, when we know that conception and child- bearing were the direct consequences of the act forbidden. How far this meaning was intended by the compiler of the Mosaic books we shall see further on. SERPENT SYMBOLISM ASSOCIATED WITH PHALLIC WOR- SHIP. That we have, in the Mosaic account of the " fall," a phallic legend, is evident from other considerations con- nected with the narrative. The most important relate to the introduction of the serpent on the scene, and the posi- tion it takes as the inciting cause of the sinful act. We are here reminded of the passage already quoted from Clemens Alexandrinus, who tells us that the serpent was the special symbol of the worship of Bacchus. Now, this animal holds a very curious place in the religions of the civilized peoples of antiquity. Although, in consequence of the influence of later thought, it came to be treated as the personification of evil, and as such appears in the Hebrew legend of the fall, yet before this the serpent was the symbol of wisdom and healing. In the latter capa- city it appears even in connection with the exodus from Egypt. It is, however, in its character as a symbol of * See Jaskar, by Dr. Donaldson, 2d edition (i860), p. 45 et seq. 40 Phallism in wisdom that it more especially claims our attention, al- though these ideas are intimately connected — the power of healing being merely a phase of wisdom. From the earliest times of which we have any historical notice, the serpent has been connected with the gods of wisdom. This animal was the especial symbol of Thoth or Taaut, a primeval deity of Syro-Egyptian mythology,* and of all those gods, such as Hermes and Seth, who can be con- nected with him. This is true also of the third mernber of the primitive Chaldean triad, H'ea or Hoa. According to Sir Henry Rawlinson, the most important titles of this deity refer ' ' to his functions as the source of all know- ledge and science." Not only is he "the intelligent fish," but his name may be read as signifying both "life " and a " serpent," and he maybe considered as "figured by the great serpent which occupies so conspicuous a place among the symbols of the gods on the black stones re- cording Babylonian benefactions." f The serpent was also the symbol of the Egyptian Kneph, who resembled the Sophia of the Gnostics-, the Divine Wisdom. This animal, moreover, was the Agathodcemon of the religions of antiquity — the giver of happiness and good fortune.:): It was in these capacities, rather than as having a phallic significance, that the serpent was associated with the sun- gods, the Chaldean Bel, the Grecian Apollo, and the Semitic Seth. But whence originated the idea' of the wisdom of the serpent which led to its connection with the legend of the " fall " ? This may, perhaps, be explained by other facts which show also the nature of the wisdom here intended. Thus, in the annals of the Mexicans, the first woman, whose name was translated by the old Spanish writers * Bunsen's Egypt, vol. iv., pp. 225, 255, 288. f History of Herodotus, vol. i. , p. 600. % Wilkinson's ^K«>«^ Egyptians, vol. iv., pp. 412, 413 ; and King's Gnos- tics, p. 31. See also Bryant's Ancient Mythology, vol. iv., p. 201. The last named work contains much curious information as to the extension of ser- pent-worship. Ancient Religions. 41 " the woman of our flesh," is always represented as ac- companied by a great male serpent. This serpent is the Sun-god Tonacatl-coatl, the principal deity of the Mexi- can pantheon ; and the goddess-mother of primitive man is called Cihua-Cohuatl, which signifies woman of the ser- pent.''' According to this legend, which agrees with that of other American tribes, a serpent must have been the father of the human race. This notion can be explained only on the supposition that the serpent was thought to have had at one time a human form. In the Hebrew legend the tempter speaks ; and " the old serpent having two feet," of Persian mythology, Ts none other than the evil spirit Ahriman himself, f The fact is that the ser- pent was only a symbol, or at most an embodiment, of the spirit which it represented, as we see from the belief of certain African and American tribes, which probably preserves the primitive form of this supposition. Serpents are looked upon by these peoples as embodiments of their departed ancestors, % and an analogous notion is enter- tained by various Hindu tribes. No doubt the noiseless movement and the activity of the serpent, combined with its peculiar gaze and marvellous power of fascination, led to its being viewed as a spirit-embodiment, and hence also as the possessor of wisdom. § In the spirit-character ascribed to the serpent, we have the explanation of the association of its worship with human sacrifice noted by Mr. Fergusson — this sacrifice being really connected with the worship of ancestors. It is evident, moreover, that we may find here the ori- * See The Serpent Symbol in America, by E. G. Squier, M.A. (American Archaeological Researches, No. i, 1851), p. 161 et seq. ; Palenquk, by M. de Waldeck and M. Brasseur de Bourbourg (1866), p. 48. f Lajard, Mim-oires de CInsiitut Royal de France (Acad, des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres), t. xiv., p. 89. X Wood's Natural History of Man, vol, i., p. 185 ; also Squier's Serpent Symbol, p. 222 et seq. § I have a strong suspicion that, in its primitive shape, the Hebrew le- gend, as that of the Mexicans, gave the serpent -form to both the father and the mother of the human race. 3 42 Phallism in gin of the idea of evil sometimes associated with the ser- pent-god. The Kafir and the Hindu, although he treats with respect any serpent which may visit his dwelling, yet entertains a suspicion of his visitant. It may, perhaps, be the embodiment of an evil spirit, or for some reason or other it may desire to injure him. Mr. Fergusson states that " the chief characteristic of the serpents throughout the east in all ages seems to have been their power over the wind and rain," which they gave or withheld accord- ing to their good or ill-will towards man.* This notion is curiously confirmed by the title given by the Egyptians to the Semitic god S'eti {Seth)-Typhon, which was the name of the Phoenician evil principle, and also of a destruc- tive wind, thus having a curious analogy with the " ty-, phoon " of the Chinese seas.f When the notion of a duality in nature was developed, there would be no diffi- culty in applying it to the symbols or embodiments by which the idea of wisdom was represented in the animal world. Thus, there came to be, not only good, but also bad, serpents, both of which are referred to in the narra- tive of the Hebrew exodus, but still more clearly in the struggle between the good and the bad serpents of Per- sian mythology, which symbolized Ormuzd, or Mithra, and the evil spirit Ahriman.:}: So far as I can discover, the serpent-symbol has not a direct phallic reference, § nor, after all, is its attribute of wisdom the most essential. The idea most intimately associated with this animal was life, not present, but future, and ultimately, no doubt, eternal. \ Thus the snake Bai was figured as guardian * Tree and Serpent Worship, p. 46. Rudi'a, the Vedic form of Siva, the " King of Serpents," is called the father of the maruts (winds). See infra as to identification of Siva with Saturn. \ The idea of circularity appears to be associated with both these names. See Bryant, op. cit., vol. iii., p. 164, and vol. ii., p. 191, as to derivation of " Typhon." \ Lajard, loc. cit., p. 182. See also Culte de Mithra, p. 35. § In the Bacchanalia the serpent's head is seen at the open lid of the box. See Dom. Martin's '''Explication," etc., pi. II., p. 29. I " Wise (jipovi/ioc {phronimoi) as serpents, and harmless (or pure) as doves." Ancient Religions. 43 of the doorways of those chambers of Egyptian tombs which represented the mansions of heaven.* A sacred serpent appears to have been kept in all the Egyptian temples, and we are told that " many of the subjects, in the tombs of the kings at Thebes in particular, show the importance it was thought to enjoy in a future state. " f The use of crowns formed of the asp, or sacred Thermu- this, given to sovereigns, and divinities, particularly to Isis,.:j: the goddess of life and healing, was, doubtless, in- tended to symbolize eternal life. This notion is quite con- sistent with the ideas entertained by the Phoenicians as to the serpent, which they supposed to have the quality " of putting off its old age, and assuming a second youth." § THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL. Another feature of the Mosaic legend of the "fall" which deserves consideration is the reference to fhe tree of knowledge, or wisdom. It is now generally supposed that the forbidden fruit was a kind of citrus, \ but certain facts connected with arhorolatry seem to me to disprove this opinion. Among peoples in the most opposite re- gions various species of the fig-tree are held sacred. . Thus it is, throughout nearly the whole of Africa, with the banyan {Ficus indicus), the sacred tree of the Hindu Brah- mins. Even in several of the Polynesian islands, as in various parts of the Indian Archipelago and in Northern Australia, the fig-tree is highly venerated. In ancient Egypt, the banyan, or the Ficus sycamorus, was always considered sacred. f So it was in Greece and Italy. Ac- — Matthew x. 16. By serpents the masculine and by doves the feminme at- tribute are represented. * See Mimoires de Vlnstitut (Academie des Inscriptions), torn, xvii., p. 97. f Wilkinson's Ancient Egyptians^ vol. v., p. 65. X Do., p. 243. § Sanchoniathon (translated by C017), in The PAcenix, p. 197. II SmitVs Dictionary of t/ie Bible. Art., " Apple-Tree. " 1[ Wilkinson, op. cit., vol. iv., pp. 260, 313. 44 Phallism in cording to Plutarch, a basket of figs forrtied one of the chief objects carried in the procession in honor of Bac- chus ; and the sacred phallus itself appears to have beeri made of the wood of the fig-tree, as was also the statue of the phallic god Priapus.* Judging from these facts, and considering that the sycamore was sacred among the Hebrews themselves — its fruit having the significance of the virgin womb f — there can be little difficulty in identifying the fig-tree, whether the sycamore or the banyan, with the tree of knowledge planted in the midst of the garden of Eden. The sense intended to be conveyed by this expression , would be evident enough without the introduction of the "tree of life." That this is intended to represent the male element is undoubted. The Chaldean god Hea, who was symbolized by the serpent, was also the god of life and knowledge; and Rawlinson states that "there are very strong grounds indeed for connecting him with the serpent of scripture, and with the Paradisiacal tradi- tions of the tree of knowledge and the tree of life.":}: The bo-tree ( Ficus religiosd) of the Buddhists is said to derive greater sacredness from its encircling the palm — the Palmyra palm being the kalpa-X.re.e, or the "tree of life" of the Hindu paradise. § This connection is termed by the Buddhists "the bo-tree united in marriage with the palm," and we have in it the perfect idea of genera- tive activity, the combination of the male and female elements. Mr. Fergusson, in accordance with his special theory as to the origin of serpent-worship, thinks that this superstition characterized the old Turanian (by which probably he means Hamitic) empire of Chaldea, while * Horace, 8th Satire. See also Ante-Nicene Library, vol. iv., Clement of Alexandria^ p. 41. f See Inman's Ancient Faiths Embodied in Ancient Names, vol. i., p. 108. This seems to have been the symbolical signification of the fig throughout the East from the earliest historical period ; as the pomegranate symbolized the full womb. \ History of Herodotus, Book i.. Appendix, Essay lo, § iv. § Tennent's Ceylon, vol. ii., p. 520. Ancient Religions. 45 tree-worship was more characteristic of the later Assy- rian empire.* This opinion is, no doubt, correct ; and it means really that the older race had that form of faith with which the serpent was always indirectly connected — adoration of the male principle of generation, the primi- tive phase of which was probably ancestor-worship ; while the latter race adored i\\Q female principle, symbolized by the saci-ed tree, the Assyrian " grove." The "^r^^of hfe," however, undoubtedly had reference to the male element, and we may well suppose that originally the fruit alone was treated as symbolical of the opposite principle. f There is still an important point connected with the Hebrew legend which requires consideration — the nature of the protecting kerub. That this was merely intended as a symbol of the deity himself, there is every reason to believe, and that the symbol was nothing more than the sacred bull of antiquity, is evident from the description of the kerub given by Ezekiel (chaps, i. and x.).:j: But what was the religious significance of the bull, an animal which it would be easy to prove was venerated by nearly all the peoples of antiquity ? It is now well known that the bull symbolized the productive force in nature, and hence it was associated with the sun-gods. The symbolic figure carried in procession during the festival of Osiris and Isis was representative, probably, of the phallus of this animal. § According to the cosmogony of the Zend- Avesta, Ormuzd, after he had created the heavens and the earth, formed the first being, called by Zoroaster "the primeval bull." This bull was poisoned by Ahri- man ; but its seed was carried, by the soul of the dying animal, represented as an ized, to the moon, " where it is continually purified and fecundated by the warmth and light of the sun, to become the germ of all creatures." * op. cit., p. 12. •f As to the sacred Indian fig-tree, see Ginguiaut's Religions de I' Aniiqiiite , vol. i., p. 149, note. :|: Faber's Pagan Idolatry, vol. i., p. 422; vol. iii., p. 606. § See Dulaure, oJ>. cit. , vol. ii. , p. 32. 46 Phallism m At the same time, the material prototypes of all living things, including man himself, issued from the body of the bull.'* This is but a developed form of the ideas which anciently were almost universally associated with this animal among those peoples who were addicted to sun-worship. There is no doubt, however, that the superstitious veneration for the bull existed, as it still ex- ists, quite independently of the worship of the heavenly bodies. f The bull, like the goat, must have been a sacred animal in Egypt before it was declared to be an embodiment of the sun-god Osiris. In some sense, in- deed, the bull and the serpent, although both of them became associated with the solar deities, were antago- nistic. The serpent was symbolical of the personal male element, or rather had especial reference to the life of man, X while the bull had relation to nature as a whole, and was symbolical of the general idea of fecundity. This antagonism was brought to an issue in the struggle between Osiris and Seti (Seth), which ended in the tri- umph of the god of nature, although it was renewed even during the exodus, when the golden calf of Osiris, or Horus, was set up in the Hebrew camp. The references made to the serpent, to the tree of wis- dom, and to the bull in the legend of the " fall," sufficiently prove its phallic character ; which was, indeed, recognized in the early Christian church. § This view is confirmed, moreover, by analogous legends in other mythologies. The Hindu legend approaches very nearly to that pre- served in the Hebrew scriptures. Thus, it is said that Siva, as the Supreme Being, desired to tempt Brahma (who had taken human form), and for this object he drop- , ped from heaven a blossom of the sacred fig-tree. Brah- * Lajard, Le Culte de Mithra, p. 50. f This superstition is found among peoples — the Kafirs, for instance — who do not appear to possess any trace of planetary worship. \ This is evident from the facts mentioned above, notwithstanding the use of this animal as a symbol of wisdom. § In connection with this subject, see St. Jerome, in his letter on Virgini- ty to Eustochia. Ancient Religions. ijj mi, instigated by his wife, Satarupa, endeavors to obtain this blossom, thinking its possession will render him im- mortal and divine ; but when he has succeeded in doing so, he is cursed by Siva, and doomed to misery and deg- radation. Mr. Hardwicke, when commenting on this tra- dition, adds that the sacred Indian fig is endowed by the Brahmans and Buddhists with mysterious significance, as the tree of knowledge or intelligence.* This legend con- firms what I have said as to the nature of the Hebrew tree of knowledge, and also the phallic explanation of the " fall " itself, when we consider the attributes of the temp- ter of the Hindu story. The Persian legend preserved in the Boun-dehesch is, however, still more conclusive. Ac- cording to this legend Meschia and Meschiane , the first man and woman, were seduced by Ahriman, under the form of a serpent, and they then first committed "in thought, word, and action, the carnal sin, and thus tainted with original sin all their descendants." f SOURCE OF THE LEGEND OF THE " FALL OF MAN." Under the circumstances I have detailed, we can hard- ly doubt that the legend of the " fall " has been derived from a foreign source. That it could not be original to the Hebrews may, I think, be proved by several consid- erations. The position occupied in the legend by the ser- pent is quite inconsistent with the use of this animal sym- bol by Moses.;]: Like Satan himself even, as the Rev. Dunbar Heath has shown, § the serpent had not, indeed, a wholly evil character among the early Hebre-\YS. In the second place, the condemnation of the act of generation * Christ and other Masters, vol. i. , p. 305. \ Lajard, op. eit., pp. 52-60. The destruction of purity in the world by the Serpent Dahaka is stated in the 9th Yajna, v. 27. We have probably here the germ of the fuller legend, which may, however, have been contained in the lost portion of the Zend-Avesta. \ The turning of Aaron's rod into a serpent had, no doubt, a reference to the idea of wisdom associated with that animal. § The Fallen Angels, 1857. 48 Phallism in was directly contrary to the central idea of patriarchal history. The promise to Abraham was that he should have seed "numerous as the stars of heaven for multitude ; " and to support this notion, the descent of Abraham is traced up to the first created man, who is commanded to increase and multiply. It is very probable, however, that when the legend was appropriated by the compiler of the Hebrew scriptures it had a moral significance as well as a merely figurative sense. The legend is divisible into two parts — the first of which is a mere statement of the imparting of wisdom by the serpent and by the eating of the fruit of a certain tree, these ideas being synonymous, or, at least, consistent, as appears by the attributes of the Chaldean Hea* The nature of this wisdom may be found in the rites of the Hindu Sacti Puja.\ The second part of the legend, which is probably of much later date, is the condemnation of the act referred to, as being in itself evil, and as leading to misery and even to death itself. The origin of this latter notion must be sought in the esoteric doctrine taught in the mysteries of Mithra, the fundamental ideas of which were the descent of the soul to earth and its re-ascent to the celestial abodes after it had overcome the temptations and debasing influences of the material life. :j; Lajard shows that these mysteries were really taken from the se- cret worship of the Chaldean Mylitta ; but the reference to " the seed of the woman who shall bruise the serpent's head," is too Mithraic for us to seek for an earlier origin for the special form taken by the Hebrew myth. The ob- ject of the myth evidently was to explain the origin of death, § from which man was to be delivered by a coming Saviour, and the whole idea is strictly Mithraic, the Per- * See supra. \ Memoirs of the Anthropological Society of London, vol. ii. , p. 264, et seq. ; and compare with the Gnostic personification of " truth" ; for which see King's Gnosticsand their Remains, p. 39. X Lajard, op. cit., p. 96. § Jehovah threatens death, but the Serpent impliedly promises life, the former having relation to the individual, the latter to the race. Ancient Religions. 49 sian deity himself being a Saviour-God.* The impor- tance attached to virginity by the early Christians sprang from the same source. The Avesta is full of references to " purity" of life ; and there is reason to beheve that, in the secret initiations, the followers of Mithra were taught to regard marriage itself as impure, f The religious ideas which found expression in the le- gend of the fall were undoubtedly of late development,:]; although derived from still earlier phases of religious thought. The simple worship in symbol of the organs of generation, and of the ancestral head of the family, prompted by the desire for offspring and the veneration for him who produced it, was extended to the generative force in nature. The bull, which, as we have seen, sym- bolized this force, was not restricted to earth, but was in course of time transferred to the heavens, and, as one of the zodiacal signs, was thought to have a peculiar rela- tion to certain of the planetary bodies. This astral phase of the phallic superstition was not unknown to the Mosaic religion. A still earlier form of this superstition was, however, known to the Hebrews, probably forming a link between the worship of the symbol of personal gener- ative power and that of the heavenly phallus ; as the wor- ship of the bull connected the veneration for the human generator with that for the universal father. HERM^, TERMINI, PILLARS AND " GROVES." One of the primeval gods of antiquity was Hermes, the Syro-Egyptian Thotli, and the Roman Mercury. Kir- cher identifies him also with the god Termimis. This is doubtless true, as Hermes was a god of boundaries, and appears, as Dulaure has well shown, to have presided over * Lajard, op. cit., p. 60, note. f Several of the Essenes, who appear to have had some connection with Mithraism, taught this doctrine. \ It is well known to biblical critics that this legend formed no part of the earlier Mosaic narrative. so Phallism in the national frontiers. The meaning of the word Thoth, erecting, associates it with this fact. The peculiar primi- tive form of Mercury, or Hermes, was " a large stone, fre- quently square, and without either hands or feet. Some- times the triangular shape was preferred, sometimes an upright pillar, and sometimes a heap of rude stones."* The pillars were called by the Greeks Hermce, and the heaps were known as Hermean heaps — the latter being accumulated " by the custom of each passenger throwing a stone to the daily increasing .mass, in honor of the god." Sometimes the pillar was represented with the attributes of Priapus.f The identification of Hermes or Mercury with Priapus is confirmed by the offices which the latter deity fulfilled. One of the most important was that of protector of gar- dens and orchards, and probably this was the original office performed by Hermes in his character of a " god of the country.":]; Figures set up as charms to protect the produce of the ground would, in course of time, be used not only for this purpose, but also to mark the boundaries of the land protected, and these offices being divided, two deities would finally be formed out of one. The Greek Hermes was connected also with the Egyptian Khem, and no less, if we may judge from the symbols used in his worship, with the Hebrew Eloah. Thus, in the history of the Hebrew patriarchs, we are told that when Jacob entered into a covenant with his father-in- law Laban, a pillar was set up, and a heap of stones made, § and Laban 5aid to Jacob, "Behold this heap and behold this pillar, which I have cast betwixt me and thee ; this heap be witness, and this pillar be witness, that I will not pass over this heap to thee, and that thou shall not pass over this heap and this pillar unto me for harm." * Faber's Pagan Idolatry. f See Dulaure, of. cit., vol. i., as to the primeval Hermes, if Smith's Diciionary of MytAology.- Art. "Hermes." g Genesis xxxi. 45 to 53. Jacob called the heap or cairn of stones Galeed, a circle, and the statue Mizpeh, or a pillar. Ancient Religions. S i We have here the Hermce and Hermean heap, used by the Greeks as landmarks, and placed by them on the public roads. In the linga of India we have another instance of the use of the pillar-symbol. The form of this symbol is sufficiently expressive of the idea which it embodies — an idea which is more explicitly shown when the Linga and the Yoni are, as is usually the case among the worship- pers of the Hindu Siva, combined to form the Lingam. The stone 'figure is not, however, itself a god, but only representative of a spirit * who is thought to be able to satisfy the yearning for children so characteristic of many primitive peoples ; this probably having been its original object, and the source of its use as an amulet for the pro- tection of children against the influence of the evil eye. In course of time, however, when other property came to be coveted equally with offspring, the power to give this property would naturally be referred to the primitive phallic spirit, and hence he became, not merely the pro- tector, as we have seen, of the produce of the fields and the guardian of boundaries, but also the god of wealth and traffic, and even the patron of thieves, as was the case with the Mercury of the Romans. The Hebrew patriarchs desired large flocks as well as numerous descendants, and hence the symbolical pillar was peculiarly fitted for their religious rites. It is related even of Abraham, the traditional founder of the Hebrew people, that he " planted a grove {eshetj^ in Beersheba, and called there on the name of Jehovah, the everlasting Elohim." :j: From the phallic character of the "grove" {ashera) said to have been in the House of Jehovah, and from the evident connection between the two words, we must suppose that the eskel of Abraham also had a phallic *. Linga means a "sign" or "token." The truth of the statement in the text would seem to follow, moreover, from the fact, that the figure is sacred only after it has undergone certain ceremonies at the hands of a priest. ■j- Said also to mean a tamarisk tree. It is asserted to have been worshipped in subsequent times. \ Genesis xxi. 33. 52 Phallism in reference.* Most probably the so-called " grove " of the earlier patriarch, though it may have been of wood, and the stone "bethel" of Jacob, had the same form, and were simply the betylus,\ the primitive symbol of deity among all Semitic and many Hamitic peoples. The participation of the Hebrew patriarchs in the rites connected with the " pillar- worship " of the ancient world, renders it extremely probable that they were not stran- gers to the later planetary worship. Many of the old phaUic symbols were associated with the new supersti- tion ; and Abraham being a Chaldean, it is natural to suppose that he was one of its adherents. Tradition, indeed, affirms that Abraham was a great astronomer, and, at one time at least, a worshipper of the heavenly bodies ; and that he and the other patriarchs continued to be affected by this superstition is shown by various inci- dents related in the Pentateuch. Thus, in the description given of the sacrificial covenant between Abraham and Jehovah, it is said that, after Abraham had divided the sacrificial animals, a deep sleep fell upon him as the sun was going down, and Jehovah spoke with him. " Then, when the sun went down, and it was dark, behold a smoking furnace and a burning lamp that passed between those pieces." The happening of this event at the mo- ment of the sun's setting reminds us of the Sabsean custom of praying to the setting sun, still practiced, according to Palgrave, among the nomads of Central Arabia. THE GREAT RELIGIOUS MOVEMENT OF ARCHAIC TIME. That some great religious movement, ascribed by tra- dition to Abraham, did take place among the Semites at an early date is undoubted. What the object of this * Even if the statement of this event be an interpolation, the argument in the text is not affected. The statement sufficiently shows what was the form of worship traditionally assigned to Abraham. f " The deity Uranus devised Bsetylia, stones having souls " (\Woiis e^'I'i'Xo"' — lithous empsuchous). Ancient Religions. S3 movement was it is difficult to decide.* It should be remembered that the Chaldeans worshipped a plurality of gods, supposed to have been symbolized by the seven planets. Among these deities the sun-god held a com- paratively inferior position, the moon-god, Hicrki, coming before him in the second triad. f It was at Ur, the special seat of the worship of the moon-god,:]: that Abraham is said to have lived before he quitted it for Haran ; and this fact, considered in the light of the traditions relating to the great patriarch, may, perhaps, justify us in inferring that the reformation .he endeavored to introduce was the substitution of a simple sun-worship for the planetary cult of the Chaldeans, in which the worship of the moon must to him have appeared to occupy a prominent place. The new faith was, indeed, a return to the old phallic idea of a god of personal generation, worshipped through the symbolical betylus, but associated also with the adoration of the sun as the especial representative of the deity. That Abraham had higher notions of the relation of man to the divine being than his forerunners is very probable, but his sojourn in Haran proves that there was nothing fundamentally different between his religious faith and that of his Syrian neighbors. I am inclined, indeed, to believe that to the traditional Abraham must be ascribed the establishment of sun-worship throughout Phoenicia and Lower Egypt, in connection with the symbols of an earlier and more simple phallic deity. Tradition, in fact, declares that he taught the Egyptians astronomy ; § and we shall see that the religion of the Phoenicians, as, indeed, that of the Hebrews themselves, was the worship of Saturn, the * May it aot have been the " Religious War " which is recorded as having talien place in the different countries of the archaic period, from India to the remoter West ? — Ed. f 'S.2m\inson's Five Ancient Monarchies, vol. i., p. 617; ii., p. 247. :]: The later Hebrews affected the Persian religion, in which the "Sun was the emblem of worship. Abraham evidently had a like preference, being a reputed iconoclast. The lunar religionists employed images in their worship. —£d. § Josephus, Antiquities of the yews, Book i., chap, viii., § 2. 54 , Phallism in erect pillar-god, who, under different names, appears to have been at the head of the pantheons of most of the peoples of antiquity. The reference in Hebrew history to the teraphim of Jacob's family recalls the fact that the name assigned to Abraham's father was Terah, a " maker of images." The teraphim were, doubtless, the same as the seraphim, which were serpent-images,* and the house- hold charms, or idols, of the Semitic worshippers of the sun-god, to whom the serpent was sacred. Little is known of the religious habits of the Hebrews during their abode in Egypt. Probably they scarcely differed from those of the Egyptians themselves ; and, even with the religion of Moses, so-called, which we may presume to have been a reformed faith, there are many points of contact with the earlier cult. The use of the ark of Osiris and Isis shows the influence of Egyptian ideas ; and the introduction of the new name for God, Jahve, is evidence of contact with late Phoenician thought, f The ark was, doubtless, used to symbolize nature, + as distin- guished from the serpent- and pillar-symbols which had relation more particularly to man. The latter, however, were by far the most important, as they were most inti- mately connected with the worship of the national deity, who was the divine father, as Abraham was the human progenitor, of the Hebrew people. That this deity, not- withstanding his change of name, retained his character of a sun-god, is shown by the fact that he is repeatedly said to have appeared to Moses under the figure of a flame. The pillar of fire which guided the Hebrews by night in the wilderness, the appearance of the cloudy pil- * The serpent-symbol of the exodus [Numbers xxi.] is called a "seraph." ■)- Moses is set forth as the son-in-law of Jethro or Hobab, the Kenite, a priest ; and probably became his disciple. At Horeb he learned, by a sacred vision, or initiation, the sacred name. As the Kenites were scribes or hiero- phants (i Chronicles ii. 55), it is very probable that they had the knowledge of this name, in common with the Phoenicians, Chaldeans, and the sacerdotal orders of otlier Asiatic nations. — Ed. X The ark was the deposilum of divine or generative power for the preser- vation of the human race. The dove always accompanies it. Ancient Religions. 55 lar at the door of the tabernacle, and probably of a flame over the mercy-seat to betoken the presence of Jehovah, and the perpetual fire on the altar, all point to the same conclusion. The notion entertained by Ewald, that the idea connected with the Hebrew Jahve was that of a " De- liverer " or "Healer" (Saviour),* is quite consistent with the fact I have stated. Not only was the primeval Phoenician deity, El, or Cronus, the preserver of the world, for the benefit of which he offered a mystical sacrifice, f but " Saviour" was a common title of the sun-gods of antiquity. THE HEBREW IDENTIFIED WITH ETHNIC RELIGIONS. There is one remarkable incident which is said to have happened during the wanderings of the Hebrews in the Sinaitic wilderness, which appears to throw much light on the character of the Mosaic cult, and to connect it with other religions. I refer to the use of the brazen serpent as a symbol for the healing of the people. :j: The worship of the golden calf may, perhaps, be described as an idola- trous act, in imitation of the rites of Egyptian Osiris-wor- ship, although probably suggested by the use of the ark. The other case, however, is far different ; and it is worth while repeating the exact words in which the use of the serpent-symbol is described. When the people were bit- ten by the "fiery" serpents, § Moses prayed for them, and we read that, thereupon, " Jehovah said unto Moses, make thee a fiery serpent [literally, a serapli\ , and set it * The History of Israel. (English translation), vol. i. , p. 532. f See Sanchoniathon (Cory, op. cit.'). X " But for the foolish devices of their wickedness, wherevi'ith being de- ceived, they worshipped serpents void of reason, and vile beasts, thou didst send a multitude of irrational beasts upon them for vengeance, that they might know that wherewithal a man sinneth, by the same also shall he be condemned." — Wisdom of Solomon.^ xi. 16. § Much discussion has taken place as to the nature of these animals. For an explanation of the epithet "fiery," see Sanchoniathon ., " Of the Serpent " (Cory, op. cit.). 56 Phallism in upon a pole ; and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live. And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole, and it came to pass that, if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass he lived."* It would seem, from this account, that the Hebrew seraph was, as before suggested, in the form of a serpent ; but what was the especial significance of this healing figure ? f At an earlier stage of our inquiry, I referred to the fact of the serpent being, indirectly, through its attribute of wisdom, a phallic symbol, but also directly an emblem of life, and to the peculiar position it held in nearly all the religions of antiquity. In later Egyptian mythology, the contest between Osiris and the Evil Being, and afterwards that between Horus and Typhon, occupy an important place. Typhon, the adversary of Horus, was figured under the symbol of a serpent, called Aphdphis, or the Giant,:]: and it cannot be doubted that he was only a later form of the god Seth. Professor Reuvens refers to an invocation of Typhon-S'eth ; § and Bunsen quotes the statement of Epiphanius that " the Egyptians celebrate the festivals of Typhon under the form of an ass, which they call Seth."| Whatever maybe the explanation of the fact, it is undoubted that, notwithstanding the hatred with which he was afterwards regarded, this god Seth, or Set, was at one time highly venerated in Egypt. Bunsen says that, up to the thirteenth century before Christ, Set " was a great god universally adored throughout Egypt, who confers on the sovereigns of the eighteenth and nine- * Numbers xxi. 8, g. , \ "Having come to the interior of the desert, the people were exposed to the attacks oi Burning Serpents, as the original text reads, the bite of which caused great pain ; and not a few of the sufferers died, which again produced an immense excitement in the camp. Moses was ordered to resort to the means of the Phoenician Ksculapius, whose symbol, the brass serpent, was erected in the camp, which produced the desired effect." — History of the Israelitish Nation, by Isaac M. Wise, p. I02. \ Wilkinson's Ancient Egyptians, vol. iy., p. 435. § Ditto, p. 434. II ^gypt> vol. iii., p. 426. Ancient Religions. 57 teenth dynasties the symbols of life and power. The most glorious monarch of the latter dynasty, Sethos, derives his name from this deity." He adds : '' But sub- sequently, in the course of the twentieth dynasty, he is suddenly treated as an evil demon, inasmuch that his effigies and name are obliterated on all the monuments and inscriptions that could be reached." Moreover, ac- cording to this distinguished writer, Seth " appears gradu- ally among the Semites as the background of their relig- ious consciousness ; " and not merely was he " the primi- tive God of Northern Egypt and Palestine," but his genealogy as " the Seth of Genesis, the father of Enoch (the man), must be considered as originally running paral- lel with that derived from the Elohim, Adam's father."* That Seth had some special connection with the Hebrews is proved, among other things, by the peculiar position occupied in their religious system by the ass — the first- born of which alone of all animals was allowed to be redeemed^ — and the red heifer — whose ashes were to be reserved as a " water of separation" for purification from sin. I Both of these animals were in Egypt sacred to Seth (Typhon), the ass being his symbol, and red oxen being at one time sacrificed to him, although at a later date objects of a red color were disliked, owing to their asso- ciation with the dreaded Typhon. § That we have a refer- ence to this deity in the name of the Hebrew lawgiver is very probable. No satisfactory derivation of this name, Moses, Mosheh (Heb.), has yet been given. || Its original form was probably Am-a-ses or Am-ses, which in course of time would become to the Hebrews Om-ses or Mo-ses, meaning only the .(god) Ses, i.e., Set or Seth.^ On this * God in History^ vol. i., pp. 233-4. f Exodus xxxiv. 20. % Numbers xix. i-io. § As to the God Seth, see Pleyte, La Religion des Pre-Israelites (1862). II The Sanscrit, Maha vuse, a great sage, seems to be a plausible etymol- ogy. Musa as it is pronounced, is the Arabic name ; and it may have an affinity with the Muses of Thessaly and the ancient sage MusEeus.- — Ed. 1 According to Pleyte, the Cabalists thought that the soul of Seth had passed into Moses {op. cit., p. 124). It is strange that the name of the 4 58 Phallism in hypothesis, there may have been preserved in the first book of Moses (so-called) some of the traditional wisdom said to have been contained in the sacred books of the Egyptian Thoth, and of the records engraved on the pil- lars of Seth. It is somewhat remarkable that, according to a statement of Diodorus, when Antiochus Epiphanes entered the temple at Jerusalem, he found in the Holy of Holies a stone figure of Moses, represented as a man with a long beard, mounted on an ass, and having a book in his hand.* The Egyptian mythus of Typhon actually said that Seth fled from Egypt riding on a gray ass.f It is strange, to say the least, that Moses should not have been allowed to enter the promised land, and that he should be so seldom referred to by later writers until long after the reign of David,:}: and above all, that the name given to his successor was Joshua, i.e., Saviour. It is wprthy of notice that Nun, the name of the father of Joshua, is the Semitic word for fish, the phallic character of the fish in Chaldean mythology being undoubted. Nin, the planet Saturn, was the fish- god of Berosus, and, as I think can be shown, he is really the same as the Assyrian national deity Asshur, whose name and office bear a curious resemblance to those of the Hebrew leader, jfoshua. But what was the character of the primitive Semitic deity ? Bunsen seems to think that Plutarch, in one pas- sage, alludes to the identity of Typhon (Seth) and Osiris. § This is a remarkable idea, and yet curiously enough Sir Gardner Wilkinson says that Typhon-Seth may have been Egyptian princess who is said to have brought up Moses is given by Jose- phus as Thermuthis, this being the name of the sacred asp of Egypt (see su- pra). We appear, also, to have a reference to the serpent in the name Levi, one of the sons of Jacob, from whom the descent of Moses was traced. * Fragments, Book xxxiv. See, also, in connection with this subject, King's Gnostics, p. 91. \ Bunsen's God in History, vol. i., p. 234. % Ewald notices this fact. See op. cit., p. 454. See, also, Inman's .<4«- cient Faiths Embodied in Anciint Names, vol. ii., p. 338. § Egypt, vol. iii., p. 433. Ancient Religions. 59 derived from the pigmy Pthah-Sokari-Osiris,* who was clearly only another form of Osiris himself. However this may be, the phallic origin of Seth can be shown from other data. Thus, it appears that the word Set means, in Hebrew, as well as in Egyptian, pillar, and in a gen- eral sense, the erect, elevated, high.f Moreover, in a passage of the Egyptian Book of the Dead, Set is called Tet, a fact which, according to Bunsen, intimates that Thoth inherited many of the attributes of Set.:}: They were, however, in reality the same deities. Set, by change of the initial letter, becomes Tet, one of the names of Thoth, or rather the same name ; as Set agrees with Seth.§ We have in this an explanation of the statement that Tet, the Phoenician Taaut, was the snake-god Es- mun-Esculapius ; | the serpent being the symbol of Tet, as we have seen it to have been that of Seth also. In this we have a means of identifying the Semitic deity Seth, with the Saturn and related deities of other peoples. Ewald says that " the common name for God, Eloah, among the Hebrews, as among all the Semites, goes back into the earliest times." f Bryant goes further, and de- clares that El was originally the name of the supreme deity among all the nations of the East.** This idea is confirmed, so far as Chaldea is concerned, by later re- searches, which show that II or El was at the head of the Babylonian pantheon. With this deity must be identified the II or Ilus of the Phoenicians, who was the same as Cronus, who again was none other than the primeval Saturn, whose worship appears to have been at one period almost universal among European and Asiatic * op. cit., vol. iv., p. 434. \ Bunsen' s Egypt, vol. iv., p. 208. % Ditto, vol. iii., p. 427. § As Tet becomes Thoth, so Mo-j«j- becomes in the Hebrew "illo-shesh. \ The Brazen Serpent made by Moses, it wiU be remembered, was the- sym- bol of this divinity ; and it was worshipped till the time of King Hezekiah, by whom it was broken in pieces. — Ed. t Op. cit., p. 319. ** Op. cit., vol. vi., p. 328. 6o Phallism in peoples. Saturn and El were thus the same deity, the latter, like the Semitic Seth, being, as is well known, symbolized by the serpent.* A direct point of con- tact between Seth and Saturn is found in the Hebrew idol Kiyim, mentioned by Amos, the planet Saturn being still called Kivan by Eastern peoples. This idol was represented in the form of a pillar, the primeval sym- bol of deity, which was common undoubtedly to all the gods here meirtioned.f These symbolical pillars were called Betyli, or Betulia. Sometimes also the column was called Abaddir, which, strangely enough, Bryant identifies with the serpent-god. f There can be no doubt that both the pillar and the serpent were associated with many of the Sun-Gods of antiquity. Notwithstanding what has been said, it is undoubtedly true that all these deities, including the Semitic Seth, became at an early date recognized as Sun-Gods, although in so doing they lost nothing of their primitive character. What this was is sufficiently shown by the significant names and titles they bore. Thus, as we have seen, Set (Seth) itself meant the erect, elevated, high, and his name on the Egyptian monuments was nearly always accom- panied by the representation of a stone. § Kiyun, or Kivan, the name of the deity said by Amos] to have been worshipped in the wilderness by the Hebrews, sig- nifies God of the Pillar. The idea embodied in this title is shown by the name Baal Tamar, which means " Baal as a Pillar," or " Phallus," consequently " the fructifying God." IF The title " erect," when given to a deity, seems always to imply a phallic notion, and hence we have the explanation of the name S. inou, used frequently in the * As to the use of this symbol generally, see Pleyte, op. cit., pp. 109, 157. f On these points, see M. Raoul-Rochette's memoir on the Assyrian and Phoenician Hercules, in the MSmoires de Plnstitut National de France {Aca- dkmie des Inscriptions), torn, xvii., p. 47 et seq. \ Op. cit., vol. i., p. 60; vol. ii., p. 201. § Pleyte, op. cit., p. 172. I Chap. V. 26. Tf Bunsen's ^^jC//, vol. iv., p. 249. '/U(>7n/. Carru^noiuwU THE MUNDANE EGG OVERSHADOWED BY THE SACRED SERPENT OF ETERNITY. COINS 'COMMEMORATXVE OF THE MOON-GOp, Ancient Religions. 6l *