afartwU mntttwaUg ffiibrarg Jlt^aca, ^tw l^atk THE GIFT OF CE. CoTleqa, V Cornell University Library arV14831 The elements of rhetoric and composition 3 1924 031 672 797 olin,anx THE ELEMENTS OP RHETORIC AND COMPOSITION A TEXT-BOOK FOR SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES BY DAVID J. HILL, LL.D. PRESIDENT OP THE TJNIVBRSITT OF ROCHESTEE, AND AUTHOR OF HILL'S RHETORICAL SERIES AND- THE ELEMENTS OF PSYCHOLOGY NEW EDITION IB SHELDON & COMPANY NEW YOEK AND CHICAGO A. 32238I PEESIDENT HILL'S TEXT-BOOKS. I. THE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC AND COMPOSITION. II. THE SCIENCE OF RHETORIC. ni. THE ELEMENTS OF LOGIC. IV. THE ELEMENTS OP PSYCHOLOGY. COPTEIGHT 1878, 1884 AND 189S, Bt Sheldon & Company. or PREFACE. It is the purpose of this book to make good writers. The extensive and constantly increasing use of the work as a text-book demonstrates the confidence of teachers in the method which is its distinguishing feature. Based upon the educational maxim, " Learn by doing," it applies the principle fruitfully by aiding the learner in doing the right thing at the right time. Teaching by practice is successful only when the learner is interested in his work. When he feels that his efforts are rewarded and that he needs more theory to improve his practice, his powers are fully awakened to action. It is taken for granted that those who will use this book can both read and write simple English sentences. For such students, the mere making of sentences is an unprof- itable exercise. What they especially need is direction in concentrating the mind upon the work of compos- ing. The only way to acquire skill in writing is by actual practice in the various processes of the art. Accord- ingly, learners should first be assisted in finding a sub- ject of thought, and then be shown how to accumulate, arrange^- and express the ideas connected with the theme. This view has given shape to the treatment of composi- tion in this book. The learner isconducted, step by.step, through the entire work of writing a composition, includ- iv PBEFAGE. ing the selection of a subject, the accumulation of mate- rials, the arrangement of the materials, the choice of words, the construction of sentences, the uses of figures, the variation of expression, the preparation of the manu- script, the criticism of the completed production, the clas- sification of it as a specific form of composition, and the resources of the English language for finer workmanship. In carrying out this plan, an effort has been made to stimulate the student with enthusiasm in his work. Many remarks and suggestions have been introduced in the smaller type, as a help to the earnest student, rather than with the intention that they shall be learned for close recitation. The present edition differs from the preceding in the following particulars : (1) many verbal improvements have been made throughout the volume ; (3) a chapter on the English Language has been added ; (3) in response to re- quests from teachers, the exercises have been more tlian doubled in quantity. They are retained at the end of the book, for two reasons : they make the text more compact ; and they may be used in the class-room without allowing the student to make too frequent reference to the text. Some of the plans are adapted from Graham's "Englisli Style." The entire work has been newly electrotyped. A Glossary has been combined with the Index. This is regarded as a valuable feature of the book, for two reasons: it makes the volume useful as a work of reference, without burdening the text with technicalities ; and it serves as a pronouncing and defining dictionary of diflBcult rhetorioal terms. PBMPAOE. V Attention is invited to the following Suggestions to Teachers. (1) The topical method of recitation is recommended. The book is especially designed for this, and pains have been taken to make the analysis clear and exact. The parts in the fine type need not be recited in this way, but may be brought out by means of questions. (3) Have the class work out the Exercises in connection with the daily recitations, using a blackboard. Eequire the students to know the principles so well that reference to the text will be unnecessary. (3) Do not exact too much at first, but insist that every principle once learned be applied in all subse- quent exercises. (4) Call attention to the Glossary, and encourage the learner to use it habitually. All the most difficult terms have their pronunciation marked. It is hoped that this will prevent any class-room discussion about sim-iles and hyperboles ! (5) Encourage the best students to recite verbatim what they can of the matter in fine type, but require of the class only the substance, assigning lessons accordingly. This plan will stimulate the more capable and ambitious students. (6) Assign frequent reviews, and require the learner to observe all the rules in his periodical compositions. The book should be -used as a handbook for reference after it has been finished in the class-room. Datid J. HllL. September, 1893. Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There "are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924031672797 CONTENTS, OR ANALYSIS. INTRODUCTION. PAGE 1. Definition of Khbtohic : 3. Relations of Rhbtokic to Grammar and Logic 3 3. Utility of Rhetoric 3 4. Division of the Subject 3 CHAPTEE I. INVENTION. 1. Meaning of Intention 5 2. Processes of Invention 6 SECTION I. THE CHOICE OP A SUBJECT. 1. Importance of Choosing a Subject 6 3. How to Obtain a Subject 7 8. Qualities of a Good Subject 7 4. Relation of the Subject to the Writer 8 5. Relation op the Subject to the Occasion 9 6. Adapting a Subject 9 7. Statement of a Subject 10 viii ANALYSIS. SECTION II. THE ACCUMULATION OF MATERIALS. PAGE 1. Importance of Collecting Materials 11 3. The Sources of Materials 12 3. How TO Use the Sources ; 13 4. Rules for Reflection 18 5. Rules for Reading 14 SECTION III. THE ARRANGEMENT OF MATERIALS. 1. Importance of Arrangement 16 2. Parts of a Composition 16 3. The Introduction 17 4. The Discussion 18 5. The Conclusion 19 6. The Two Methods of Arrangement 19 7. Adyantagbs of the Two Methods 21 CHAPTEK II. STYLE. 1. Definition of Style 23 2. The Importance of Style 24 3. The General Law of Style 25 4. Division of this Chapter 35 ANALYSIS. ix SECTIOlSr I. DICTION. PAGE 1. Definition of Diction 35 3. Means op Acquibinq a Vocabulaiit 36 3. The Essentials of Good Diction 37 I. PURITY. 1. The MEANIN& of Purity 38 3. Babbabisms 39 3. The Naturalization of Words 31 4. The Fobmation of Woeds 31 II. PROPRIETY. 1. Meaning of Pbopbiett 33 3. Rules fob Propbiety 34 III. PRECISION. 1. Meaning of Precision 37 3. Rules fob Pkecision 88 SECTIOlSr II. SENTENCES. 1. Definitions 43 3. Division of this Subject 44 I. CONCORD. 1. Rules fob Simple Sentences 45 3. Rules fob Compound and Complex Sentences 51 X ANALYSIS. II. CLEARNESS. PAGE 1. The Importance of Clbakness 53 3. EuiBS FOR Clearness 54 III. UNITY. 1. Meaning of Unity 58 3. Rules for Unity 59 IV. ENERGY. 1. Meaning of Energy 63 2. Rules for Energy 63 V. HARMONY. 1. The Value of Harmony .- 66 2. RtJLES FOR Harmony 67 SECTION III. PARAGRAPHS. 1. The Importance of Paragraphs 71 3. Rules for Pabagraphs 72 3. Examples of Paragraphs 75 SECTION IV. FIGURES. 1. Definition of Figures 77 2. The Origin of Figures 78 3. The Advantages of Figures 79 4. Kinds of Figures 81 (1) Simile 83 (3) Metaphor 83 ANALYSIS. xi PAGE (8) Personification . . ; 83 (4) Allegory 84 (5) Synecdoclie 85 (6) Metonymy 86 (7) Exclamation 87 (8) Hyperbole 87 (9) Apostrophe 88 (10) Vision 88 (11) Antithesis 89 (13) Climax 89 (13) Epigram 90 (14) Interrogation 90 (15) Irony 90 5. Rules fob Figukbs 91 SECTION V. VARIATION OF EXPRESSION. 1. Impoktance of Vakiett 93 2. Kinds of Vabiation 94 3. Vabiation of Diction 94 4 Vabiation of Stbuctubb 97 CHAPTEK III. PUNCTUATION AND CAPITALS. 1. The Pebpabation of Manhsobipts 101 3. The Pubpose op Punctuation 103 3. Classification of the Points 103 xii ANALTaiS. SECTION I. THE GRAMMATICAL POINTS. PAGE 1. Rules foe the Comma 104 Rule 1. — Parenthetical Expression 105 RtTLE 3. — Words in Apposition 106 Rule 3. — Relative Clauses 106 RtTLE 4. — Words in a Series 107 Rule 5. — Continued Sentences 107 Rule 6. — Dependent Clauses 108 Rule 7.— Transposed Parts 108 Rule 8. — Logical Subject 108 Rule 9. — Absolute Constructions 108 Rule 10.— Words in Pairs 108 Rule 11.— Ellipsis of a Verb 109 Rule 13. — Words in the Vocative 109 Rule 13.— Brief Quotations 109 RxjLB 14. — Numeral Figures 109 2. Rules fob the Semicolon 109 Rule 1. — Short Sentences Connected 110 Rule 2. — Subdivided Members 110 Rule 3. — Added Clauses 110 Rule 4. — Particulars in Apposition 110 Rule 5. — Common Dependence Ill 3. Rules fok the Colon Ill RxjLE 1. — Subdivided Members Ill Rule 2. — Supplementary Clauses 112 Rule 3. — Formal Quotations 112 Rule 4.— Title-Pages 113 4. Rules fob the Pebiod 113 Rule 1. — Complete Sentences 113 Rule 2. — Abbreviations 113 Rule 3. — Title-Pages and Headings 114 ANALYSIS. xiii SECTION 11. THE RHETORICAL POINTS. PAGE 1. Rules for the Interrogation Point 114 Rule 1. — Direct Questions 114 Rule 2.— Doubt 115 3. Rules for the Exclamation Point 115 Rule 1. — With Interjections 115 Rule 3. — Strong Emotion 116 3. Rules for the Dash 116 Rule 1. — Abrupt Changes 116 Rule 3. — Rhetorical Pauses 116 Rule .3. — Rhetorical Repetition 117 Rule 4.— The Parenthetical Dash 117 Role 5. — Omissions 117 Rule 6. — Dependent Expressions 118 Rule 7. — ^Headings and Authorities 118 4. Rule for the Parenthesis 119 5. Rules for the Quotation 130 RuiE 1. — Direct Quotations 130 Rule 3. — Quoted Quotations 131 SECTION III. PRINTERS' MARKS. 1. Accents 121 3. The Apostrophe 133 3. Braces 133 4. Brackets 133 5. The Caret 133 6. The CEiJiLLA 133 XIV ANALYSIS. 7. DiBKBSis 122 8. Ellipsis 123 9. Emphasis 122 10. Thb Hyphen 123 11. Italics 123 12. Lbadbhs 123 13. Leads 123 14. Paragraphs 123 15. QtTANTiTT Marks 123 16. Reference Marks 123 17. The Section 123 18. The Tilde 123 19. Types 124 SECTION IV. CAPITAL LETTERS. RtTLE 1. — First Words 125 IJdlb 2. — Headings 125 Utile 3.— Quoted Titles 125 iiULB 4. — Names of the Deity t . . . . 125 Rule 5. — The Bible 126 Rule 6. — Proper Names 127 Rule 7. — Derivations from Proper Names 127 Rule 8.— Titles of Office and Honor I37 Rule 9. — Personification 127 Rule 10.— Terms Defined 128 Rule 11. — Numbered Items 128 Rule 12. — The Pronoun I and the Interjection 128 Rule 13. — Important Words 128 Rule 14. — Roman Numerals 128 ANALYSIS. XV SECTION V. THE CORRECTION OF PROOFS. PAOE 1. The Pkbpaeation of Copt 129 3. The Reading op Peoop 130 OHAPTEK IV. CRITICISM. 1 Definition of Criticism 134 3. The Value of Criticism 134 3. Kinds of Litbbart Criticism 135 4. Method op Treatment 136 SECTION I TASTE. 1. Definition of Taste 137 3. Analysis of Taste 188 8. The Qualities of Taste 139 4. Taste Unitersal 139 5. The Variation of Taste 140 8. The Standard of Taste 141 7. The Claim of this Standard 143 8. The Cultitation of Taste 143 9. Catholicity of Taste . 144 SECTION II. THE PLEASURES OF TASTE. 1., Kinds of Esthetic Pleasure. .:. .^. ..;.... . 145 .2. The Beautiful ; ■, .. ..^ . , ,.; 147 xvi AJS-ALTSIS. PAGE 3. The Sublimb 151 4. Thb Witty 154 5. The Humobotis 156 6. The Pathetic 158 CHAPTEE V. SPECIAL FORMS OP COMPOSITION. 1. Kinds op Composition 161 2. Method op Tbbatmbnt 163 SECTION I. DESCEIPTIONS. 1. Qualitibs op a Good Dbscription 164 2. The Process op Describing 165 SECTION II. NARRATIVES. 1. Qualities op a Good Narrativb 167 2. The Plot op a Naerative 168 3. Thb Qualities of a Plot 169 SECTION III. LETTERS. 1. The Purpose op Letters 170 2. The Kinds op Lettbes 170 3. The Pabts op a Letter 177 4. Genbral Bulbs for Writing Letters 184 ANALYSIS. xvii SECTION IV. OEATIONS. PAGE 1. The Natorb of an Oration 186 3. Kinds of Obatort 187 3. The Natuee of Persuasion 188 4. The Qualities of an Oration 189 5. The Parts of an Oration 190 6. The Management of the Feelings 191 7. The Qualifications of an Orator 193 SECTION" V. POEMS. 1. The Nature of a Poem 194 3. KiNBS of Poems 195 3. The Method of Poetry 198 4. Versification 300 CHAPTER YI. THE ENGLISH LANaUA&E. 1. Definition of Language 206 3. The Development of Language 307 3. The Eelationship of Languages 208 4. The Indo-European Languages 209 5. The Affiliations of English , 211 6. Division of this Chapter 213 xviii ANALYSIS. SECTIQN I. THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH. PAQE 1 . Thb Oeiginal Home of English 213 3. The Migrations op the Anglo-Saxons 213 3. The Charactbkistics op Anglo-Saxon 215 4. The Inpltjencb op the CHtmoH 216 5. The Inplubncb op the Danes 217 6. The Norman Conquest 219 7. The Fdsion op the Elements 231 SECTION II. THE ANGLO-SAXON ELEMENT. 1. The Anglo-Saxon Vocabxjlart 233 3. The Lost Words op Anglo-Saxon 234 3. The Lost Inflections op Anglo-Saxon 325 4. Anglo-Saxon Idioms 326 5. The Transliteration of Anglo-Saxon 227 6. Anglo-Saxon Prefixes and StrppixBs 238 SECTION III. THE LATIN ELEMENT. 1. The Latin VocABtrLART 230 2. The Modes op Latin Influence 232 3. Latin Stems, Prefixes, and Suffixes 233 4. The Latin Numerals 240 5. The Extent op the Latin Element in Engi,ish 241 6. The Latin Element at Different Periods 243 AJfALTSIS. xix SECTION IV. THK GREEK ELEMENT. FAOE 1. The Gbebk Vocabttlaky 344 2. Gkbbk Stems, Pebpixes, and Suffixes 346 3. The Gkebk Numerals 348 4. The Tbansliteration op Greek 349 SECTIOlSr V. INCIDENTAL CONTRIBUTIONS. 1. The Incidbntal Sources op English 349 3. Words Derived prom Places 351 3. Words op Mythic and Personal Origin 351 4. The Destiny op English 353 EXERCISES. OHAPTEE I. INVENTION. Section I. — Tlie Choice of a Subject 357 Section II. — The Accumulation of Materials 360 Section III. — The Arrangement of Materials 365 XX ANALYSIS. CHAPTEK II. STYLE. PAOB Section 1. — Diction 379 Section II. — Sentences 285 Sbction III. — Paragraplis 300 Section IV. — Figures 301 Section T. — Variation of Expression 313 CHAPTEK III. PUNCTUATION AND CAPITALS. Section I. — The Grammatical Points 321 Section II.— The Rhetorical Points 329 Section III.— The Use of Capitals 333 CHA.PTER V. SPECL^ FORMS OP COMPOSITION. Section I.— Descriptions 338 Section II. — Narratives 839 Section III. — Letters 341 Section IV. — Poems 343 CHAPTER VI. THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. General Exbkciseb 346 Index and Glossabt 351 INTRODUCTION. 1. Definition of Rhetoric. Bhetoric is both a science and an art. It is a science when it discovers and establishes the laws of discourse, an art when the laws are applied in practice. Ehetoric is, therefore, the science of the laws of eflFective discourse, or the art of speaking and writing effectively. The word Bhetoric was first applied to spoken discourse only. It is derived through the Greek juriTopudi (rheiorihe) from }>^up {rhetor), a speaker : and, accordingly, means the art of speaking. The same general principles underlie and govern both oral and written discourse, and hence the meaning of the word was so ex- tended as to include ail kinds of composition. This is its modern sense. While Rhetoric was understood to apply only to spoken discourse, it included vocal delivery, and hence Elocution was re- garded as a part of Rhetoric. In modern times, so much attention has been paid to delivery, and, since the invention of printing, writ- ing has become so important, that the oral utterance of a composi- tion is ranked as a distinct art, and is no longer treated as a part of Rhetoric. The reasons for this separation are : (1) It is a bodily exercise requiring a special training. (3) A person may be a good rhetorician without being a good speaker. (3) Penmanship would belong to Rhetoric by as good a right as Elocution. 2 LNTBOnUGTION. 2. Relations of Rhetoric to Grammar and Logic. To speak or write effectively, one must be correct in language, consistent in thought, and both forcible and pleasing in manner. Grammar teaches us how to write and speak correctly — that is, according to the best usage of those who use the same language. Logic teaches us how to state our thoughts consistently with one another and with the laws of mind. Rhetoric teaches us how to add to mere correctness and consistency such force and attractive- ness as to make our thoughts clear and interesting to others. It is evident from what is said above that Bhetoric presupposes both Gframmar and Logic. No composition can be really effective with educated persons unless it is grammatical and logical. Hence Rhetoric is founded upon Grammar and Logic, and derives many of its laws from them. In "The Science of Rhetoric '' much attention is given to the Laws of Mind, which must be heeded in effective writing and speaking. Anything more than an allusion to these more philosophical relations of the subject would be out of place in an elementary work. It is hoped, however, that no one who ear- nestly wishes to be a thorough rhetorician will neglect these more difficult but very important relations. 3. Utility of Rhetoric. Nothing can be more useful to us than a knowledge of Rhetoric. Some of the reasons are as follows : (1) Discourse is governed by laws which should be understood in order to be obeyed. (2) A knowledge of principles enables us to do every- thing more effectively than we could without such knowledge, and this especially applies to composition. (3) The study of Ehetoric qualifies us to criticize and enjoy the finest productions of literary genius. INTRODUGTION. 3 (4) The mastery of discourse gives us power for good over all intelligent beings. It has been maintained by some, that rules fetter genius and make a writer stiff and pedantic. It is true that a rule imperfectly understood or clumsily applied is a hindrance to one's natural pow- ers of expression, but this applies equally well to the precepts of any difficult art, such as reading, playing on the piano, and swim- ming. Practice alone can make the rules of any art so familiar that we obey them unconsciously, and this is particularly true of writing and speaking. It is also said that many have risen to emi- nence without knowing the rules of literary art. However this may be, it is certain that, whether these men of genius understood the rules or not, they obeyed them, and their success is owing to their fidelity to them. The greatest writers and speakers have been faith- ful students of rhetorical art. The following story of the great- est American orator well illustrates how great achievements are made. "On a certain occasion Mr. Webster startled the Senate by a beautiful and striking i-emark in relation to the extent of the Brit- ish empire, as follows: 'She has dotted the surface of the whole globe with her possessions and military posts, whose morning drum- beat, following the sun and keeping company with the hours, circles the earth daily with one continuous and unbroken strain of the mar- tial airs of England.' On going out of the Senate, one of the mem- bers complimented Mr. Webster upon this, saying that he was all the more struck with it as it was evidently impromptu. ' You are mistaken, ' said Mr. Webster ; ' the idea occurred to me when I was on the ramparts of Quebec some months ago. I wrote it down and rewrote it, and after several trials got it to suit me, and laid it up for use. The time came to-day, and so I put it in.' " 4. Division of the Subject. As this book is designed to be wholly practical, it is proposed to conduct the learner along the entire path of actual writing, from the choice of the subject to the com- pletion of a composition. In order to do this most natu- rally, we shall suppose, for the sake of thoroughness, that the learner is a beginner in the art, and to set about the 4 INTHOD UOTION. work of writing for the first time. The steps of such a journey are clearly as follows : (1) Finding something to say, — or Invention. (3) Finding how to say what is to be said, — or Style. (3) The preparation of the manuscript for the eye of another, — or Punctuation and Capitals. (4) The critical examination of what has been written, — or Criticism. (5) The classification of the most common kinds of writing, — or Specific Forms of Composition. (6) A consideration of the resources of the language in which we write, — in our case, The English Language. These will be our chapters. The stiiotly scientific division of Bhetoric, as the author conceives it, has been given in his more advanced work, " The Science of Rhetoric." Discourse aims to produce a change (1) in the mind, (2) by means of ideas, (3) expressed through language. This view jus- tifies the division of Rhetoric into Laws of Mind, Laws of Idea, and Laws of Form. A more empirical method, however, seems necessary in an elementary work. Nothing can be more distasteful to the hegiimer than to plunge at once into facts and laws of Psychology, however necessary these may be to a scientific view of the subject. If any arrangement is equally repugnant to the learner, it is to place the dry and technical rules of Punctuation in the very beginning of a book, as some writers have done. Al- though in actual composition Invention is more difficult than Style, no one cares about the manner of saying anything until he has something to say. The history and resources of our own language have no practical value until the art of expression is sufiiciently acquired to show the value of the various elements which constitute our mother-tongue. The arrangement here adapted seems the most natural, and, accordingly, the most inviting, to young writers. THE ELEMEI^TS OE RHETORIC AND COMPOSITION. CHAPTER I. INVENTION. 1. Meaning of Invention. The term invention (from the Latin invenlre, to find) is applied to the whole process of finding out what to say, from the selection of a subject to the expression of the ideas. The word also means the power of contriving anything, and even the thing contrived, as when we say, " He is a man of great invention " ; or, " The sewing- machine is a useful invention." In its rhetorical sense. Invention may be defined : The preparation of the matter of a composition. In the strictest sense, Xnvention does not belong to Bhetoric. What the writer or speaker says, must depend upon his subject, and Rhetoric simply aids him in deciding how to say it effectively. If it were otherwise, Rhetoric would be a universal science, and would have to lay down rules for the lawyer, the preacher, the lecturer, and even the scientific writer. This would be impossible. What is necessary in each case must be determined by the facts of the subject and the purpose for which one composes. In an elemen- tary work, however, some rules may be given for the guidance of the beginner. 6 THE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC. 2. Processes of Invention. The first step in preparing the matter for a composi- tion is to select a subject upon which to concentrate the thoughts. The next is to accumulate materials by which to explain, illustrate, or enforce the subject. The next is to select from the mass of materials that which is adapted to our purpose and arrange Jt in a suitable man- ner. These processes, {1) The Choice, of a Subject. (2) The Accumulation of Materials. And, {3) The Arrangement of the Matter, will be treated of in the following sections. SECTION I. The Choice of a Subject. 1. The Importance of Choosing a Subject. It is impossible to write clearly unless one has a theme in mind on which the attention is steadily fixed. If there be no subject, words will be strung along loosely and to no purpose, confusion of thought will be evident, and the production will be useless. A steady adherence to the subject, making everything bear upon and support it, was the chief merit of the greatest orator of an- tiquity, Demosthenes. So thoroughly was he possessed with his theme that when we read his orations " it is as though we were em- barked upon a mighty river. All is animation and energy, and we gaze with a momentary reverie upon the deep and transparent waters. But even while we admire, the current grows deeper and deeper, and we are unconsciously hurried onward with increasing and irresistible power." INVENTION. 7 2. How to Obtain a Subject. Sometimes a subject is given to a writer, and he is re- quired to write about it. More frequently the selection is left -tQ the writer himself. In the latter case, he is likely to be at a loss how to decide upon a suitable theme. The best way is to begin by asking yourself questions un- til something suggests itself which really interests you. Having in this way obtained a theme, before finally adopting it, try it carefully by the following rules, in order to test its fitness. It should be suited to the writer and the occasion, as well as suitable in itself. Much should be made of the suggestion to ask youiself ques- tions. This is the door to all great discoveries in science, inven- tions in art, and originality in literature. If learners would only- open their eyes and notice what is occurring about them every day, in nature, society, and their own personal experience, they would find attractive subjects suggested almost every moment. 3. Qualities of a Good Subject. Since we cannot write equally well on every subject, some rules for judging of the fitness of a subject in itself may be given. (1) A subject must have unity. By this is meant that it must be one subject, and not a medley of thoughts without connections. (3) It must not be too broad. The narrower a sub- ject, the more fresh and original will be the treatment. This seems strange at first, but you see more things with the help of a microscope than you see with the naked eye ; and by examining a subject closely new ideas are suggested. 8 THE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC. (3) It must be clear. In a composition everything will be cloudy unless the theme be clear. The subject is the sun, the paragraphs are the planets, and the sentences are the satellites. The sentences reflect light on the paragraphs, which shine with the light of the subject, but if you omit this source of light, all is darkness. (4) It must be fresh. Do not be satisfied with old or musty themes that have no interest for any one. The world is full of subjects that quicken and delight the curiosity. Composition writing is a joyous occupation when it is made a fountain of knowledge. 4. KelatioH of the Subject to the "Writer. A subject may be very interesting in itself and yet not suited to the writer who has chosen it. Hence we have some rules on this point. (1) The writer must be interested in his subject It is very disagreeable and unprofitable to regard composition writing as task-work. There is no necessity for this slavish feeling. Every one is interested in something. (2) He should choose something upon which he can ex- press what he believes. Earnestness of conviction is a great help to clear, strong expression, and without it there is danger of all kinds of fanciful vaporizing. (3) He should choose a subject suited to his powers. It is not necessary that all the knowledge required for a full treatment of the subject should be possessed beforehand. One of the best results of writing is that learners study a subject carefully, in order to write about it well. But the subject should not be above the writer's ability to under- "iNVENTION. 9 stand, with a reasonable amount of reflection, advice, and reading. 5. Relation of the Subject to the Occasion. A subject may be good in itself and suited to the writer, but still fail of its purpose because not iit for the occasion. We must, therefore, consider a third class of rules. (1) The subject should be harmonious with the feelings proper to the occasion, A due regard must always be had for the position, character, and sentiments of the persons whom we address. (2) The subject should be of interest at the time as well as to the persons whose attention is enlisted. ISTo one has the right to rob others of their time, and tax their patience, in listening to what is untimely or dull. (3) The subject should be suited to the intelligence of those for whom it is intended. Unless this rule is obeyed, our efforts are wasted and the previous rule is violated. 6. Adapting a Subject. Possibly a subject may be too good to reject and yet require some change, in order to suit the writer or the occasion. In this case, it may often be adapted by some slight limitation. Thus, for example, let us take the sub- ject "Virtue." This is too broad for treatment in a single composition. We may modify it in a great many ways. We may say, for instance, "The Origin of Virtue," "The Advantages of Virtue," "The Eewards of Virtue," "The Hindrances to Virtue," etc. By breaking up the subject ill this way we make the new subjects less broad, but some 10 THE ELEMENTS OF BHETOBIG. of them are quite difficult as compared with others. This helps us to select from the different views of a subject that which is best suited to us. We may then continue the process of limitation. For instance, we may limit "The Eewards of Virtue'' to some particular class, say merchants, and we should have, "The Eewards of Virtue to Merchants." We may further limit virtue by confin- ing it to some one kind of virtue, say honesty, and we should have, "The Eewards of Honesty to Merchants." 7. Statement of a Subject. If any one will examine the last subject a little, he will discover that it is ambiguous ; and this leads us to some rules on the statement of a subject. (1) The statement must be clear. " The Eewards of Honesty to Merchants" may be a good subject, but its meaning is not perfectly ckar. Does it mean, the re- wards of those who are honest to merchants, or the rewards of merchants who are honest ? It may mean either, and hence should be differently stated ; as, " The Eewards of Honesty in Merchants." {%) Avoid meaningless combinations of words. A cele- brated American writer calls one of his books, " The Past, the Present, and the Future," and no one can guess from the title upon what subject he has written. (3) Avoid figurative expressions. No meaning is con- veyed by such titles as "Sesame and Lilies," and " Chips from a German Workshop," which great authors sometimes give to their books. (4) Be careful to limit properly the statement of the sub- ject. If one were to write, for example, on the " Eewards mf^B2^TI02V. 11 of Virtue," and call his composition "Virtue," he would promise much more than he would perform. It is difficult to insist on such rules as have been laid down above, when men of genius, like Ruskin, persist in giving their works such fanciful titles that no one can tell what they mean. Thus we have "A Crown of Wild Olives," on work, traffic, and war; "The Queen of the Air," on Greek myths of cloud and storm; "Unto this Last,'' on the elements of political economy. The prac- tice is a vexatious one, and deserves to be discouraged. In this section, on " The Choice of a Subject," we have considered : (1) The Importance of Choosing a Subject. {2) How to Obtain a Subject. {3) The Qualities of a Good Subject. {Jf) The Relation of the Subject to the Writer. {5) The Relation of the Subject to the Occasion. (6) Adapting a Subject. (7) The Statement of a Subject. SECTION 11. The AccuMTJLATioisr op Materials. 1. The Importance of Collecting Materials. No one should presume to write or speak without hav- ing something worth saying. It sometimes happens that we can say something really valuable without much efEort, but generally it is necessary to exert ourselves in order to say anything appropriate. He who has an in- teresting fact, an apt illustration, or a satisfactory expla- nation to offer on any subject will command attention. If we say only what readily suggests itself to us, we shall probably r6peat only what jias already been thought of by 12 THE ELEMENTS OF REETOBIO. others. Hence, the first thing to do after selecting a sub- ject is to collect facts, illustrations, and proofs with re- gard to it. Young writers are especially anxious to be original, and often feel that it is unworthy of them to seek for information outside of their own experience. Let any one ask himself what portion of his know- ledge has originated with himself and what portion has been derived from books and conversation, and his regard for his own attain- ments will very much diminish. But originality in literature doep not consist in an absolute creation of something out of nothing. This is impossible, even in fiction, for the imagination can combine only those elements which observation and instruction have afforded. He is original in the literary sense who forms, a new combination of facts, throws new light upon their relations, or illustrates them in a new and attractive way. He is best able to do this who has the widest range of knowledge. It has been well said, that invention in art does not consist in finding out something new, but in finding a new value in something old. 2. The Sources of Materials. "Where are we to look for these materials ? The sources from which they may be derived are four : (1) If our subject permit it, we may obtain materials by actual observation. (3) Sometimes we may secure thoughts on the subject by reflection. (3) In most cases, if we have access to a library or even to an encyclopedia, we may find sufiBcient informa- tion by reading. (4) Occasionally we cannot find just what is wanted in books, but may procure help from some intelligent person by conversation. It is cruel to require learners to make bricks without straw. It is not wonderful that school compositions are so often the bane of the writer and barren nf h11 interest to the instructor. Nothing has INVENTION. 13 so much tended to lessen respect for rhetorical studies as the false notion that Rhetoric is a mere playing with words. Let the young wi'iter first of all be led to the sources of knowledge and have some- thing to say before he is required to write. "Speak not at all in any wise," says a great modeni writer, Thomas Carlyle, "until you have somewhat to speak; care not so much for the reward of your speaking, but simply and with undivided mind for the truth of your speaking." Fullness of knowledge improves a writer's matter, man- ner, and morals. 3. How to Use the Sources. First of all, use your own senses. See and hear all you can that will help you. Knowledge obtained by one's self is always more clear, fresh, and interesting than if obtained at second hand. Do not go to Homer for a sun- rise, when you can see one every morning. After observ- ing, reflect. Try to remember all you can that you have ever known about the subject. Questions will at once arise which you cannot answer. Go to books for the answers. If the books do not help you, ask some person who may be able to direct you. Never ask help as long as you can help yourself. It is a good plan for the teacher never to furnish assistance when it is possible for the learner to accomplish his purpose without aid. It is advisable to suggest authorities, but each one should be required to consult them for himself, and to judge for himself what wiU suit his purpose. The habit of investigation is of very great value to every one who acquires it. In all the professions, such as law, medicine, theology, or teaching, one of the chief occupations is the consulting of authorities. The earlier the habit is acquired the better. 4. Kules for Keflection. A few plain hints about reflection may be of use. (1) Sorround your subject with questions. Let us take the subject "Clouds," to illustrate. You begin by asking, 14 TBE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC. What are clouds? How are clouds produced? What are their forms? What are their uses? Why do they bring rain ? Why do clouds bring wind ? How do clouds cause thunder ? (3) Try to answer your own questions. This will quicken your thoughts and supply you with much to say, but you will now feel the need of better answers than you can give. This will lead you to consult books. Kichter advises one never to read "until he has thought himself hungry." If reading precede reflection, two disadvantages follow. In the first place, we are likely to be so well satisfied with the opinions of others that we accept them without reflection, unless we have formed views of our own. In the second place, we are not so much interested in what we read as if we were previously anxious to eon- firm or rectify our own ideas on the subject. Hence Gibbon com- mends his own habit of reading, which he thus describes : ' ' After a rapid glance on the subject and distribution of a new book, I suspend the reading of it, which I only resume after having examined the subject in all its relations; after having called up in my solitary walks all that 1 have read, or thought, or learned in regard to the subject of the whole book or of some chapter in particular. I thus place myself in a position to estimate what the author may add to my general stock of knowledge, and I am thus sometimes favorablv disposed by the accordance, sometimes armed by the opposition c our views." 5. Rules for Reading. A few brief suggestions on reading may be helpful. (1) Reading should be varied. If a single author be followed, there is danger of being a servile copyist, or even a b lagiari sti without your having any such intention. The consultation of several authors leads to comparison and cultivates the judgment. ~f~f INVENTION. 15 (2) Reading must be assimilated. If we do not make our own that which we borrow from books, we have no right to use it. We have made the matter of a book our own only when we perfectly understand it, and can express it in our own language. (3) Obtain general views first. Encyclopedias, reviews, and indexes will direct you to more specific authorities, after giving you an outline of the subject. A great English teacher, Dr. Thomas Arnold of Rugby, once said that, in his opinion, that is the best composition " which shows that the boy has read and thought for himself ; that the next best which shows that he has read several books, and digested what he has read ; and that the worst which shows that he has followed but one book, and that without reflection.'' It is an important question how far one may use the writings of others without breaking a moral law. Literary property differs from other possessions in many ways, but it is' none the less property. Facts are tjommon to all; but, while no one may put a fence around truth and claim it as his own, forms of expression, figures of speech, and combinations of thought, belong to their author, for they are his products. It is always wrong to make a false pretense. If extracts are taken they should be acknowledged as such, and not passed off as your own. If an ab- stract or paraphrase is made, giving an author's views in somewhat different language, that also ought to be made known. Such sum- maries may be of great service to the learner, by providing him with the matter and leaving him free to use all his powers of expression. In this section, on "The Accumulation of Mate- rials," we have considered : {1) The Importance of Collecting Materials. (B) The Sources of Materials. (3) Sow to use the Sources. (4) Mules for Reflection. (5) JRules for Beading. 16 THE ELEMENTS OF BHETOBIC. SECTION III. The Aebangement of Materials. 1. Importance of Arrangement. A mass of materials, however fine the quality, no more constitutes a composition than a pile of bricks and lumber constitutes a palace. The builder must select, fit, and join together the materials before there is a building. A host of men crowded together are not an army. Lines must be formed and order instituted before one is ready for a battle. A writer requires as much skill in arrangement as a general. Words, sentences, and paragraphs are a writer^s soldiers, companies, and regiments. A great French Writer, Pascal, says, " The disposition of the mate- rials is something new. In playing tennis both use the same ball, but one places it better than the other. It might as well be objected that I use current words ; as if the same thoughts did not form a different body of discourse by a different arrangement, just as the same words differently disposed form different thoughts." 2. Parts of a Composition. The usual parts of a composition are three: (1) There should be an introduction. This is not nec- essary, but it is usually required to bring the discussion into connection with the occasion. (2) There must be a discussion. By this is meant that we cannot establish any idea in the mind of another without using facts, illustrations, or arguments to assist us. (3) There must be a conclusion. When we invite others to accompany us in our thoughts, we ai-e under an INVENTION. 1? obligatiou to conduct them to some new state of mind. Unless some end is to be attained, there is no use of writ- ing or speaking. We should always have some definite state of mind in view, to which everything should tend. The ancient rhetoricians regarded an oration as having six essen- tial parts, (1) the Exordium, (2) the Division, (3) the Statement, (4) the Reasoning, (5) the Appeal to the Feelings, and (6) the Peroration. This division is mechanical and arbitrary. The more natural and fully conformed to the subject-matter and the purpose the division is, the better. Sometimes no exordium is needed. Often a formal division is undesirable. A statement is occasionally unnecessary. Reasoning is often needless after a mere recital of facts. An appeal to the feelings is sometimes wholly improper. 3. The Introduction. The introduction should have the following qualities : (1) It should be modest. If you raise great expec- tations at the outset, you will either be compelled to make a great effort to fulfill your promises, or bear the odium of disappointing your readers. (3) It should be moderate. Your reader is not likely to feel very deeply until he has given attention to the facts and arguments which may have aroused your mind. Let the feelings develop with the discussion. (3) It should be short. The object of an introduction is merely to introduce the main discussion. It should be proportionately brief. The vestibule should not be larger than the house. (4) It should be natural. By this is meant that it should grow out of both the subject and the occasion, so as to form a convenient bridge between them. (5) It should excite interest. It is not so necessary 18 THE ELEMENTS OF BHETOBIO. that the introduction should be striking in itself as that it should awaken a desire to follow the writer and learn more about the subject. Attention is generally given at the beginning, but it is soon lost, if there be no promise of reward. Although Cicero laid down the mle, that the introduction should be written last, in order that it might spring naturally from the matter under consideration, he did not always obey his own precept. In one of his Letters to Atticus, we learn that he was accustomed to prepare a quantity of introductions, to be used when needed. Hav- ing inadvertently used the same one twice, he was informed by Atticus of his blunder, and, confessing his mistake, sent him a new one. Cicero's rule was better than his practice. 4. The Discussion. The discussion will be improved by keeping in mind two questions : (1) What, precisely, do I wish to accomplish 1 If the pur- pose of the composition be steadily held in mind, every fact, argument, and illustration will probably be appropriate to the subject and add strength and interest to the whole. (3) How shall I accomplish my object? This question will suggest heads and illustrations, and also help in combining them. Whatever does not contribute to the purpose must at once be rejected. A composition must grow like a tree. A tree is surrounded with materials, but it takes only what it can assimilate. Much heroism is required to avoid putting thoughts, words, or figures into our writings when their only claim is their intrinsic beauty. At this point the difference between a cultivated and a barbarous taste is evident in writing. The savage paints his face with the brightest and most incongruous colors, and ornaments his person with all the gorgeous articles in his possession. It is because INVENTION. 19 lie loves finery for its own sake. A similar taste is often shown in writing. To put all your fine figures and phrases and illusions into a composition which they serve only to ornament, but not to illus- trate or strengthen, is like collecting all the fine articles in the house for exhibition in a front window. 5. The Conclusion. Some rules may be given as regards the conclusion. (1) The conclusion should not be forced. The natural and proper consequences of the discussion may be stated in the conclusion, but care is necessary to avoid claiming more than has been established. (2) The conclusion may express more feeling than the introduction. After considering all the facts the reader is better prepared to share your emotions. The conclu- sion is the place, therefore, for an appeal to the feelings. (3) A conclusion may consist of a recapitulation of the discussion. This is especially useful if, for any reason, the discussion has been fragmentary or made up of many details. An inverse order is best, if the strongest points have been stated first. The conclusion should, like a burning-glass, gather and concentrate into a focal point all the separate rays of the composition. 6. The Two Methods of Arrangement. There are two methods of arrangement which may be used in combining the materials of a composition. They are as follows : (1) The analytic method begins with facts and derives principles from them. It also begins with a complex whole and resolves it into its elements. 20 THE ELEMENTS OF BHETOBIG. (2) The synthetic method is the reverse of the analytic. It begins with principles and classifies facts under them. It begins with elements and combines them into a whole. The two methods are fully illustrated below. Explanation. — The words Analysis and Synthesis are easily confused. Analysis is from the Greek words ava and liieiv, mean- ing to loosen again, — that is, to disengage. Synthesis is from the Greek aim and ridevai, meaning to put together, — that is, to com- pound. A fact may be regarded as a concrete embodiment of principles. The elucidation of the principles involved is then analysis. Beginning with a material whole, analysis resolves it into its parts. Synthesis is the reverse of analysis. Beginning with principles, it puts together the facts logically ranging themselves under them. The distinction between the analytical and the syn- thetical method may be more fully traced in Hamilton's " Logic," pages 336, 340. Examples. — Let us start with the question, What are the bene- fits of railroads? Prom the various sources of information we find the following to be facts: (1) Railroads facilitate purchases. (2) They carry news. (3) They prevent suffering by conveying succor. (4) In travel they save time, which may be used in reading. (5) They make a market for produce. (6) They furnish labor to the poor. (7) They arrest crime. (8) They render wai-s less probable by uniting the interests of men. (9) They make men more charitable by extending their knowledge of one another. If these facts were stated as they are above, they would have considerable force, btit they gain something by a more systematic arrangement. Let us see how great an improvement this is. First, let us try the analytic method. By this method we derive principles from facts. Let us see what principles may be derived from the facts given. Railroads (a) Facilitate purchases. (b) Make a market for produce. (1) Hence, promote commercial prosperity, (o) Prevent suffering. (S) Furnish labor to the poor. (c) Render wars improbable. (3) Hence, promote physical prosperity. But since they promote oommereial and physical prosperity, they INVENTION. 21 I. Promote material prosperity. They also (a) Carry news. (b) Save time for reading. (1) Hence, promote inielHffejice. (a) Arrest crime. (fi) Make men more charitable. (3) Hence, promote morals. But since they promote intelligence and morals, they II. Promote social prosperity. Result : Since they promote material and social prosperity, RAILROADS ARE A UNIVERSAL BENEFIT. Let US now reverse the arrangement and present the same facts according to the synthetic method. First of all, we must state a Theme : Railroads are a universal benefit, for I. They promote material prosperity. (1) By promoting commercial prosperity. (a) For they facilitate purchases. {b) And make a market for produce. (2) By promoting physical prosperity, (a) For they prevent sufEering. (6) And furnish labor to the poor. (c) And render wars improbable. II. And promote social prosperity. (1) By Tpromoting intelligence. (a) For they carry news. (6) And save time for reading. (2) By promoting morals. (a) For they arrest crime. (b) And. make men more charitable. 7. Advantages of the Two Methods. Bach method has its own advantages. The analytic method is the more interesting, as one sees the truth grow before his eyes. It is the method of investigation, and causes the reader to feel that he is helping to reach the result. The synthetic method is more clear and compen- dious, and is the natural way of conveying what one has fully mastered. 22 THE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC. In this section, on **The Arrangement of Mate- rials," we have considered : {!) The Impartance of Arrangement. {2) The Parts of a Composition. ((f) Tlie Introduction. (Jj.) The Discussion. {5) The Conclusion. (6) The Two Methods of Arrangement. (7) The Advantages of the Two Methods. CHAPTEE II. STYLE. 1. Deflnitlou of Style. Style is the manner in which thought is expressed. The word is derived from the Latin stylus, meaning the pointed instrument with which the ancients wrote on tab- lets covered with wax. The name of the instrument was soon transferred to the manner of expression, just as we say that one has a charcxamg pen. When a writer becomes addicted to a particular mode of express- ing his thoughts, his peculiarities are called Mannerisms; and they often lead to his detection, when he writes anonymously. Such peculiarities ought not to be cultivated. They indicate narrowness of mind or poverty of resources. , The perfection of style is to suit the manner to the matter. A gbod, writer not only says new things, but he says them in g, ni*w way. Attempts have been made to classify the different Muds of style, but they have resulted in nothing better than enumeration. Some of the most common varieties may be mentioned, though no pains should be taken to confine one's self to any one. (1) The dry style excludes all ornament. It aims only to express the thoughts accurately, without any appeal to the sense of beauty. Berkeley has been classed as a dry writer. (3) The plain style does not aspire after ornament, but aims to make a clear statement, using such figures as illustrate without embellishing the thoughts. Locke and Whately may be included among plain writers. (3) The neat style employs ornaments, but very sparingly. Its figures are cor- rect; its diction is pure; its sentences are clear and harmonious. 24: THE ELEMENTS OF RREIORIO. Gray and Goldsmith are neat writers. (4) The elegant style is more pretentious, using every ornament which can beautify, but avoid- ing every excess which would degrade. Addison has been esteemed an elegant writer, but Maeaulay belongs more justly to this class. (5) The florid style runs to excess and crowds the' expression with superfluous and superficial ornament, combining an excess of ad- jectives with the boldest and most highjy colored imagery. The so-called poems of Ossian are illustrations of this style. (6) The bombastic style is characterized by such an excess of words and or- naments as to become ridiculous. Sergeant Buzf uz' speech, in, " The Pickwick Papers," is a fair example. Other varieties of style are sufficiently marked by the adjectives used to describe therti. They are the colloquial, the laconic, the concise, the diffuse, the abrupt, the flowing, the quaint, the epigrammatic, the flowery, the feeble, the nervous, the vehement, the affected. In fact, style is as vari- ous as character, of which language is the expression. A great French writer, Buffon, well says, " The, style is the man himself." 2. The Importance of Style. The value of an attractive style cannot be overesti- mated. Many of the most celebrated works of literature have been made immortal by the beauty of their style alone. Though thought is the basis of every great com- position, it will be neglected, unless style embalms it and preserves it to coming ages. "In proportion as the excellence of the form transcends the value of the matter, does the literary work gain perpetuity. . . . Indeed, in proportion as the very substance of a literary work, the thought it contains, becomes important, is it difiicult for it to claim and hold a place in literature. . . . The very interest of the facts stated stimulates further inquiry, and thus pushes into the background those who first contributed to it. The hard workers, the investigators and compilers in the fields of knowledge, descend by genesis only to those who come after them; their discoveries, their theories, like wind-sown flowei-s, enrich many who are ignorant of their origin. . . . There must be in the literary work, as in the crystal, something which cannot be broken in on without loss, something in itself specific and final." — Bascom. STYLE. 25 3. The General Law of Style. All the qualities of an excellent style are implied in one general law, whicli may be stated as follows : "That form of expression is most excellent which yields its contained idea with the least expenditure of mental power." This law was first suggested by Herbert Spencer in his ingenious essay on "The Philosophy o£ Style." The law is most fully estab- lished and illustrated in the " Science of Rhetoric," where it is used to explain all the ordinary rules of style. 4. Division of this Chapter. The first step in the improvement of style is to choose the right words ; the second, to combine them into correct and effective sentences ; the third, to group the sentences into paragraphs ; the fourth, to enrich the style with appropriate figures; and the fifth, to vary the expression of our thoughts. In this chapter we shall, accordingly, devote a section to each of these topics: (1) Diction. (B) Sentences. (3) Paragraphs. (4) Figures. And, (-^'^-^^''"*~^^y ■' [ffe»eraf| Music ainmlgthose who were styled the chosen peo- ple ^as a religious ar t/ \_Sp6Bifie\ The songs of Zioij.^hich we have reason to thinkjwere in high repute / among the courts of eastern raoiiarehsJHrere nothing else but psilmsjthat adored or cele- brated the Supreme Being. {IndimdimV\ The ' greatest conqueror^ in this holy nation, after the manner of the old Grecian lyricsj(Jj^ not only compose the word* of his divine odes, but generally ^gt ^hem to music himseltt^auerwhieh, his wacljs/jJioqgh they were consecrated to the tabernaclej became the national entertainment, ag^ell as the devotion of his people?'^ ' O^^""^ (3) Sometimes the hint of each snccessive sentence is suggested by a previous word. This is the common style of Burke. It is liable to degenerate into tedious expansion. The following example from Burke illustrates ( this method: jJ^^ W:f^'"->T ' ' f/^'^^^^ " The other sort of men wMe the pmiticia/ia. (To them,)who had little or not at all reflectecl on the subject, religicnigasvifeselflwo J [object of love or hMrem They disbelieved it, and rece(Ied by a comma; as, "He is a man of much experience, who has cross examined his own soul." So also it should be preceded by a comma, when immediately fol- lowed by an expression set off by commas; as, " The soldier, who. PUNCTUATION AND CAPITALS. 107 without fear, oflEers Ms life for his country, deserves the admiration of his fellows." A relative with several antecedents should be preceded by a, comma;, as, " No other can know the joys, sorrows, fears, and strug- gles, which fill another's heart." Rule 4. — Words in a Series. — In a series of words, of the same part of speech, and in the same construction, a comma should be placed between each two ; as, "Honor, wealth, duty, and- safety are the leading motives of men." When the conjunctions are expressed, the comma should be omitted; as, "Let us freely drink in the soul of love and beauty and wisdoiu from all nature and art and history." Some would separate all these words by a comma between eMch two, but such is not the best usage. When the conjunction is omitted between the last two words in a series, a comma must be placed after the last; as, "Let us try to enrich, purify, ennoble, our minds." A comma should not be placed after the last word of a series when followed by a single word; as, "Life is a constant, responsi- ble, unavoidable reality." Care should be taken to avoid regarding words as in the same grammatical construction because they happen to be tlie same parts' of speech. In the expression, "A swift black hawk," the first, ad- jective qualifies both the second adjective and the noun talcen to- gether, and not simply the noun. It would be wrong to write the expression, ■' A swift, black hawk." Rule 5. — Continued Sentences. — Each simple coordi- nate sentence or expression in a continued sentence, should be followed by a comma ; as, " Science tunnels mountains, spans continents, bridges seas, and weighs the stars." If the coordinate elements of a sentence are complex, they must be separated by semicolons; as, "Science, by the help of explosives, tunnels mountains; by the power of steam, spans continents; by the aid of the mariner's compass, bridges seas ; and, by her skill in calculation, weighs the stars." 108 THE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC. EuLE 6. — Dependent Clauses. — Dependent clauses should be set oflE by commas; as, "If the soul is im- mortal, its character will determine its destiny." A dependent clause is one that requires another to complete its meaning. It is generally introduced by a conjunction; as, if, un- less.untU, etc. Sometimes the conjunction is omitted, and the con- dition implied by the context; as, " Were I Ca3sar. I would not be a tyrant." When a clause is very closely connected with its principal clause, or introduced by that, — unless removed at a consideralile distance from the verb or preceded by in order, — the comma is omitted; as, "He knew that it was wrong"; but "He used every available form of assistance, that he might succeed"; and "He reads, in order that he may gain knowledge." EuLE 7. — Transposed Parts. — A part transposed from the middle or end to the beginning of a sentence, should be followed by a comma ; as, " To govern for a moment, he betrays a sacred trust." EuLE 8. — Logical Subject. — When the logical subject of a sentence ends in a verb, or consists of parts subdi- vided, by commas, or is very long, the subject should be followed by a comma ; as, " Those who falter, fail." "A life of folly, pleasure, and sin, ends in ruin." EuLE 9. — Absolute Constructions. — Clauses in the ab- solute construction should be separated from the rest of the sentence by commas; as. "The doors being open, 1 saw far into the interior of the house." EuLE 10. — Words in Pairs. — Words or expressions in pairs should have a comma after each pair; as, "Hope and despondency, joy and sorrow, pleasure and pain, diversify life with their sudden contrasts." PUNCTUATION AND CAPITALS. 109 EuLB 11. — Ellipsis of a Verb — When, in a continued sentence, a common verb is omitted, its place is marked by a~ comma ; as, "Homer was the greater genius ; Virgil, the better artist." EuLB 13.— Words in the Vocative. — ^ Words in the case of address should be pointed ofE from the rest of the sen- tence ; as, " I am sure, Henry, that you are right." " Sir, I rise to ask a question." EuLE 13. — Brief ftuotations. — A brief quotation, or a sentence resembling a quotation, should be introduced by a comma ; as, "The first words of the Bible are, 'In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. ' " "One of the first lessons of a judicious education is. Learn to think and to discriminate." EuLE 14. — Numeral Figures. — N'umbers espressed in figures, except dates, are punctuated according to the de- cinial system, which requires a comma before every group of three figures, beginning at the right; as, "The Eocky Mountains rise 13,500 feet above the level of the ocean ; the Andes, 31,440 feet." When numerals are written in word', no commas are used. Thus, the sentence given above would be written as follows: " The Rocky Mountains rise twelve thousand five hundred feet above the level of the ocean; the Andes, twenty-one thousand icur hundred and forty feet." 2. Rules for a Semicolon. The Semicolon [;] is used to mark the divisions of a sentence next greater than those requiring a comma. The following are the principal rules : 110 THIS ELEMENTS OF BHETORIC. Rule 1. — Short Sentences connected. — When several connected short sentences, without grammatical depend- ence, are written one after the other, they should be divided by semicolons ; as, " There is good for the good ; there is virtue for the virtuous ; there is victory for the valiant ; there is spirituality for the spiritual." The practice ol! writers differs in the cases covered by the rule. Some insist on using a period in all such cases. One objection is that it makes the p ige seem crowded with capitals. When there is a very close connection, the period indicates less connection than the case demands. In pi'actice, the comma, semicolon, colon, or period is used, according to the closeness of the connection. Rule 2. — Subdivided Members. — Members of sentences subdivided by commas, unless very closely connected, should be separated by semicolons; as, "Prosperity is naturally, though not necessarily, attached to virtue and merit ; adversity, to folly and vice." Rule 3. — Added Clauses — When a clause stating a reason, inference, or explanation is added to a complete sentence, if introduced by a connecting word, the added clause is preceded by a semicolon; as, " E.xaminations are formidable even to the best prepared; for the great- est fool may ask more questions than the wisest man can answer." When the connection is very close, a comma may be used. An example, introduced to illustrate, when thus added, is pre- ceded by i chapter. It is supposed to be derived from the Latin words, lig- num sectionis, sign of a section; the two old-fashioned longyy being written side by side, but finally one below the other. (18) The Tilde [S] is a character written above the letter n in Spanish words, to show that the letter should be sounded as if spelled with y; as, s«^or, sir. 134 THE ELEMENTS OF BEBTORIC. (19) Types have names to distinguish their shape anil size. As regards shape, they are ordinary Roman, small capitals, ROMAN CAPITALS, Italics, ITALIG CAPITALS. «©ID CngUglj, or Math ^ztttu Oerman Zt):t. Full-Face. Antique. Scttpt, Old Style and Gothic. As regards size they are as follows: Pica. — Composition is the method of arranging Small Pica. — Composition is the method of arran Long Primer. — Composition is the method of arrangin Bourgeois.— Composition is the method of arranging types in t Brevier. — Composition is the method of arranging types in the pro JlftTOOM.— Composition is the method of arranging types in the proper fo Nonpareil— Composition is the method of arranging types in the proper form fo Agate. — Composition ia the method of arranging types in the proper form for use. PfloW.— CoMposrrioN is the method of arranglug types in the proper form for use. SECTION IV. Capital Letters. Capital Letters are used for the sake of giving distinc- tion to certain words, so that the sense may be more obvious. The most important rules for their use are stated below. In mauuscripts, capitals are indicated by drawing lines under the written words; two lines for small capitals, and three lines for CAPITALS. The excessive use of capitals is similar to the abuse of Italics. Some great writers, as Thomas Carlyle, have given the weight of their usage to this practice, but even they cannot redeem it from the suspicion of affectation. In the German language every noun be- PUNCTUATION AND CAPITALS. 135 gins with a capital. Such writers as Carlyle probably boi-row their practice from German literature. Capitals are of advantage only when used so sparingly as to contrast with small letters. Rule 1.— First Words.— A capital should be used to begin the first word of (1) every sentence, (3) every direct quotation, (3) every direct question, and (4) every line of poetry ; as, — (1) "The Anglo-Saxon, tlie subtraction of our modern English, is emphatically monosyllabic. The Bnglish Bible abounds in grand, sublime, and tender passages couched almost entirely in words of one syllable." (2) Dr. Johnson once said : *' My children, clear your minds of cant." (3) let me ask you this question : Why do you study 1 (4) " Adieu ! adieu ! my native shore Fades o'er the water blue. The night- winds sigh, the breakers roar. And shrieks the wild sea-mew." The word capital (from the Latin caput, head) seems to suggest the use pointed out in the above rule, as capitals are the liead letters of sentences. Rule 3.— Headings. — Headings of essays and chap- ters should be wholly in capitals ; as, CHAPTER III. — PUNCTUATION" AND CAPITALS. Rule 3. — Quoted Titles. — When titles of books or essays are- quoted, every noun, adjective, pronoun, verb, and ad- verb should begin with a capital ; as. White's " Words and Their Uses." Locke's "Essay on the Human Under- standing." Rule 4. — Names of the Deity. — Names and titles of God and Christ should begin with a capital ; as, Heavenly Father, Creator, Jehovah, Lord, Saviour, Son of God, Almighty. When Providence is used to mean the One who provides for us, it begins with a capital ; otherwise not. 136 TEE ELEMENTS OF BSETOBIC. When a name of the Deity is applied to a created being, it does not begin with a capital ; as, "Lord of lords and King of kings." " The Lord is a great God, above all gods." There is much diversity of practice in regard to pronouns refeiTing to God. Some insist on using Thou, Thine, Thee; He, His, Him ; Who, Whose, Whom. In the best editions of the English Bible, the pronouns are not printed thus, but with small letters. Wilson says, "Pronouns referring to God and Christ should not begin with capitals, unless they are used emphatically without a noun." EiiLE 5. — The Bible.^ Expressions used to designate the Bible, or any particular division of it, should begin with a capital ; as, the Sacred Writings, the Holy Bible, God's Word, the Old Testament, the Gospel of John, the Psalms, etc. The names of other sacred books also are capitalized; as, the Vedas, the Koran, the Zend-Avesta, the Eddas. KuLE 6. — Proper Names — Proper names begin with a capital ; as, Ceesar, Apollo, Germany, the Atlantic, Christmas. The words river, sea, mountain, etc., when used generally, are not proper nouns ; but when used with an adjective or adjunct to specify a particular object, they are proper names; as, the Hudson River, the Black Sea, the Rocky Mountains. The words North, South, East, and West are proper names when they denote certain regions of the country; as, " The Xorth and the South are now at peace." But they are not proper names when they denote mere geographical position or direction; as, " Chicago is west of New York." The word Devil, when applied to Satan, begins with a capital; as, "The Devil is the father of lies." If used generally, it begins with a small letter ; as, " The devils also believe and tremble." When a proper name is compounded with another word, the part which is not a proper name begins with a capital if it precedes, but with a small letter if it follows, the hyphen : as, Post-Homeric, Ante- Christian, Sunday-school. PUNCTUATION AND CAPITALS. 127 Rule 7. — Derivatives from Proper Hames. — Words de- rived from proper names generally begin with a capital ; as, American, Eoman, Christian, Mohammedan, Ameri- canize, Romanize, Christianize, Judaize. Some words have so completely lost their connection with their primitives, that they are printed without capitals; as, da/mash, from Damascus; philippic, from Philip; simony, from Simon. The names of political parties, religious sects, and schools of thought generally begin with a capital, even when not derivatives from proper names; as, Whigs, Tories, Republicans, Radicals, Jews, Protestants, Catholics, Calvinists, Methodists, Baptists, Nominalists, Realists, Idealists, Associationalists, Spiritualists. Names of the days of the week, and names of the months, begin with a capital; as, Thursday, from Thor; Ivly, from Julius; Au- gust, from Augustus. Rule 8.— Titles of Office and Honor.— Titles of office and honor should begin with a capital; as, The President of the United States, His Excellency the G-overnor of Pennsylvania, the Emperor ISTapoleon, Alderman Smith, Sir Francis Bacon. "When titles like the above are used frequently, and not in con- nection with a proper name, small letters are used ; as, " They spoke . sadly of the king's illness." But when used with the proper name, titles should always begin with a capital. When used in a specific sense, the words Academy, OoUege, Consti- tution, State, University, etc., should begin with a capital ; as, " Har- vard University is an old institution.'' When used generally, these words should begin with a small letter; as, "Our country owes much to its colleges and universities." Rule 9, — Personification. — In vivid personification, the noun personified begins with a capital ; as, — " With quickened step, Brown Night retires ; young Day comes in apace^ And opens all the lawny prospect wide.'' 128 THK ELEMENTS OF RHETOBIO. Kdle 10. — Terms Defined. — ^ Words defined, or intro- duced for explanation, begin with a capital ; as, " The Comma is used to mark the least divisions of a sentence." Rule 11. — Niiinbered Items Items distinctly num- bered should begin with a capital; as, "Beading serves, 1. To inform the mind ; 3. To delight the imagination ; and 3. To perfect the character." When the numbers are introduced parenthetically,- capitals are not necessary, nor are periods necessary after the numbers. The tendency is to drop both the periods and the capitals in the body of the text, and to reserve the uninelosed numbers for the beginning of paragraphs; or, at least, of sentences. The following is neater than the example under the rule: "Reading serves (1) to inform the mind, (3) to delight the imagination, and (3) to perfect the character." Rule 12. — The Pronoun I and the Interjection 0. — These should always be capitals. Rule 13. — Important Words -Any words or expressions of special importance, such as those denoting (1) historical events, (2) nnusnal phenomena, and (3) epochs of time, should begin with capitals ; as, (1) the French Revolu- tion ; (2) the Aurora Borealis ; (3) the Augustan Age. Rule 14. — Roman Numerals.— Capitals are sometimes used to represent numbers ; as, I., II., III., IV., V., etc. Dates on title-pages were formerly printed in this way. Refer- ences to books are frequently made by using these numbei-s; as, " Whately's Elements of Logic, Book II., Chap. III., Sec.V., p. 118." Many prefer, however, when the references are numerous, to use small letters ; as, " Whatelv's Elements of Logic, book ii, chap, iii, sec. V, p. 118." CORRECTION OF PROOFS. 129 SECTION V. The Cokeectiok of Proops. This Chapter would be iiioomplete without a few directions for the correction of proof-sheets. Almost every one, at some time in the course of his life, will have occasion to contribute something to the press, if it be nothing more than an advertisement or an article in the local newspaper. However trifling the item may be, it is impor- tant to know that it is correct. In order to insure accuracy, two things must.be done: (1) the Copy must be correctly prepared; and (2) the Proof must be carefully read. A few suggestions will be given on these two points. 1. The Preparation of Copy. In preparing the copy, the following rules must be observed : (1) Write distinctly. It is unfair to the compositor who sets up your copy, to require him to solve enigmas at every sentence. (2) Write on only one side of the paper. The liability of mistake is lessened by leaving oue side blank, and printers can more easily divide the copy into "takes" — or portions assigned to different compositors. (3) Make your own paragraphs. It is unreasonable to impose on the printer a task which you find too difficult for yourself, or which you are too indolent to perform. (4) See that all the words are correctly spelled. Tjis especially applies to all technical or proper names, of which the compositor may reasonably be ignorant. (5) Do your own pointing. Unless you use the points as you want them, the printer may not understand your meaning and so may misrepresent you. The trihttlations of a compositor who puzzles over bad copy are amusingly illustrated in the following newspaper paragraph, quoted by Wilson : "The late Sharon Turner, author of the 'History of the Anglo-Saxons,' who received three hundred a year from Government as a literary pension, wrote the third volume of his ' Sacred History of the World ' upon paper which did not cost him a farthing. The copy consisted of torn and angular fragments of letters and notes; of covers of periodicals,— gray, drab, or green,— written in thick, round band over a small print ; of shreds of curling paper, unctuous with pomatum or 130 THE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC. bear's-grease ; and of the white wrappers in which his proofs were sent from the printers. The paper, sometimes as thin as a bank-note, was written on both sides; and was so sodden with inlc, plastered on with a pen worn to a stump, that hours were frequently wasted in discovering on which side of it certain sentences were written. Men condemned to work on it saw their dinner vanishing in illim- itable perspective, and first-rate hands groaned over it a whole day for ten pence. One poor fellow assured the writer of this paper, that lie could not eani enongh upon it to pay his rent, and that he had seven mouths to fill besides his own. In the hope of mending matters in some degi-ee, slips of stout white paper were sent frequently with the proofs ; but the good gentleman could not afford to use them, and they never came back as copy." 2. The Beading of Proof. Even when the writer has observed all the above rales, and the printer has exercised skill and taste in putting the copy in type, there wiU often be many inaccuracies and ineleganeies in the printed impression. This impression is called a Fiooi Broad mar- gins are left for corrections, which are to be distinctly noted by the author. In reading the proofs, several rules should be observed. (.V) Criticize the matter of the composition. This should be done as carefully as possible before sending the copy to the printer, but many things will be evident in print which are not easily detected in manuscript. (2) See that the printer has made no alterations. Sometimes mis- takes are made through carelessness or ignorance in reading the manuscript, and sometimes the compositor thinks he knows better than the author what ought to be said. (3) Observe any queries marked by the printer. It sometimes hap- pens that the printer Aoea know better than the writer how to spell a word or punctuate a sentence. He then ought to be thanked for any query which suggests a change to the author. In all cases the suggestion should either be accepted and the change made, or re- jected by crossing out the query, so as not to leave the printer in doubt. (4) TTse the accepted signs employed by printers in making corrections. These have become fixed, so that all intelligent printers under- stand them, and their use saves much time and trouble. The prin- cipal signs of this kind are used in the annexed example of a corrected proof-sheet. (5) Make your corrections in the margin and not in the body of the page. Care is necessary to do this so accurately and neatly that the corrector of the forms will have no difficult v in understanding the changes to be made. COBREGTION OF PROOFS. 131 The Copy sent to the Printer. '^ke (ooUdeum, coLoadai tadte gave ziae to the (ooLiaeum, oSeze, indeed, gigantic dimenaiona were necednax-y i foz, though, hundteda could entet at once, ana fifty thouaani) find aeatd, the apace waa atill inaufficient fox. cfbome, and the czowd fot the motning gamea began at midnight, ireapaaian and tDitua, ad if pteaaging theii own deatha, huztied the building, and left aevex.al mazka of theit pzecipitancg oehlnd, on the uppez walla they have inaezted atoned which had evidently been dzeaaed foz tt diffezent puzpoae, <&ome of the azcadea ate gzoaaly unequal ; no moulding pzeaezvea the aame level and fozm zound the whole ellipae, and evezy ozdet ia full of liccndc, {5he oZ/ortc haa no tziglypka noz metopea, and ita azch ia too low foz ita columna ; the cJonic zepeata the entab- latuze of the ^— Some of the no tzeak ffiom., 13 arcades are grossly M?iequal; no moulding pre- 14 serves the same level and form round the whole vf, I, c. 15 ellipse, ^nd every order is full of license. The 16 Doric has no triglyphs nor metopes, and its arch Stal. f». 17 is 0ow\toq) f or its columns; the Ionic repeats 18 the entablature of the Doric. the third order is .0ap 19 but a rough cast of the cprinthian, and its foli- ■/ jrplant;; the fourth seems •/ 20 age the thickest waterplant;; the fourth seems a I 21^ere repetition of Ihe third in pilasters; and 22 the whole is crowned by a heavy Attic. Happily Q \') hi 23 for the Coliseum, tji(e shape V 24 phitheatre has given it a stability - dtet 25 tion ' ouffloiont to resist fires and yv 26 and lightnings and siegesV to an am- of c^^truo- earthquakes neccMatu CORREOTION OF PROOFS. 133 Elxplanation of Proof-Marks. 1. Capitals are marked by drawing three lines under the word, as in line 1. 2. Small Capitals are marked by drawing two lines under the word, as in line 2. A SaperflnoQS Letter has a line drawn through it, and d (the Latin dele, destroy) is put in the margin. 3. An Inverted Letter is marked as in line 3. 4. A Space is inserted as in line 4. 5. A Space is removed as in line 5. 6. A Line is indented as in line 6. 7. A Word is depressed as in line 7. 8. A Word is elevated as in line 8. 9. A Word is moved, either to the right or left, as in line 9; only the mark is turned so that the angle shows the direction in which the word is to be moved. 10. A ftnadrat (a piece of type-metal used to space the letters) sometimes appears. Its face is depressed as in line 10. 11. A Broken Letter is marked as in line 11. 12. No Break is marked as in line 12. A Paragraph is marked by placing TT in the margin. 13. Koman Letters are marked as in line 13. 14. Wrong Font, or wrong style of type, is marked as in line 14. 15. Lower-case Errors are marked as in line 15. 16. Italic Letters are marked as in line 16. 17. Words to be Transposed are marked as in line 17. 18. A Point Left Out is inserted as in line 18. 19. A Capital Letter is inserted as in line 19. 20. A Hyphen Left Oat is inserted as in line 20. 21. A Letter Left Out is inserted as in line 21. 22. Same as 18. See also line 26. 23. A Word or Expression Left Out is inserted as in line 23. 24. Letters to be Transposed are marked as in line 24, 25. Stet is the Latin for "let it stand, or remain," and is used when a supposed error has been corrected, but afterward is found not to be an error. 26. Quotation Marks are inserted as in line 26. Apostrophes are inserted in a similar manner. CHAPTER IV- CEITICISM. 1. Definition of Criticism. Criticism (from the Greek xpivetv, krinein, to judge) is the art of judging of the merits and defects of any pro- duction. Literary criticism is the art of judging of the merits and defects of a written composition. The word '■ criticism'' means also the act of criticizing ; as, " This book invites severe criticism"; and even a critical writ- ing; as, "Macaulay's criticism of Milton." The word critique, however, is better suited to this last meaning. It is a common error to suppose that criticism is the art of fault- finding. Its true function, as the word criticism implies, is judicial. The critic is a judge. Hence partiality of any kind ought not to influ- ence his judgment. He is to point out excellences as well as defects, and, balancing all, to decide upon the value of the production. In this he will necessarily be guided by his own principles and taste ; hence it is important that these should be correct and pure. As criticism is thus dependent upon personal views and feelings, it can- not claim scientific certainty for its results, except as these are founded upon universally admitted principles. 2. The Value of Criticism. The value of criticism is two-fold : (1) to the writer in composing; and {%) to the reader in enjoying literary works. (JMITIGiaM. 135 A trained writer criticizes his own work at eyery step of its progress, and modifies his plan and method as he pro- ceeds. Many excellences, no doubt, are introduced with- out conscious intention, but many even of these are owing to a critical habit of thought, which is the result of pre- vious effort. In addition to this habitual criticism a more deliberate and scrutinizing examination of a composition is of great value. The act of composing is frequently accompanied with a glow of satisfaction which magnifies merits and conceals defects. Hence the eye of another, or the writer's own after an interval of time, will often detect faults which are not apparent to the composer at the time of writing. On the other hand, many elaborate compositions re- quire close inspection to discover their latent beauties and artistic finish. Hence the competent critic has a never- failing source of enjoyment in the exercise of his art. It is a good plan to subject our literary workmaasUp to the criticism of another, even though he be no more competent than the writer to judge of literary merit. One's own subsequent judgment also is generally worth waiting for. It is an excellent rule never to regard a composition finished until, after sufficient time has elapsed to allow it to pass out of the writer's mind, it is deliberately criticized and retouched. In this drier light of afterthought one's ideas, plan, diction, and figures are judged according to their own meritc and not with the partiality of authorship. 3. Kinds of Literary Criticism. In criticizing a composition we may make any one of several elements the prominent object of attention. (1) We may consider only the truth of the matter. This is called Real Criticism. (2) We may limit our examination 136 THE ELICMENTS OF RSETORIO. to the validity of the arguments. This is called Logical Criticism. (3) We may regard only the language used. This is called Verbal Criticism. (4) We may examine the production as a work of art designed to gratify the taste. This is called iEsthetic Criticism. As truth must be discovered by special acquaintance with each department of knowledge, it would be useless to attempt any state- ment of the principles of real criticism. Real criticism assumes two principal forms — historical oriticism, and acientiflc criticism. The former aims to decide what documents of antiquity are worthy of credence and what events actually occurred. This has recently be- come an important branch of investigation. Scientific criticism aims to separate the true from the false in the data and theories of science. Logical criticism is based on certain principles called laws of thought, and is properly considered in the study of Logic. Ver- bal criticism derives its autliority from the principles of Style, as laid down in the second chapter of this book. The learner may find some excellent examples of verbal criticism in Blair's "Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres,'' Lectures xx.-xxiv. iEsthetic oriti- cism is founded upon the liiws of sesthetics, or the science of beauty and kindreil emotions. As some knowledge of the principles of taste is desirable in connection with criticism, ffisthetic criticism wUl receive special attention in the following pages. 4. Method of Treatment. There are two elements in criticism, (1) the absolute, and (3) the relative. (1) The absolute element comprises the fixed principles of actual fact, the laws of thought, and the canons of style. These cannot be violated with impunity even by genius. (2) The relative element comprises the conditions of taste which relate to our enjoyment of "literary works. These are not the same for all times, races, or persons. OBITIOIBM. 137 Having already considered at some length the more ele- mentary of the absolute principles, we may now devote some attention to the relative principles of criticism. The critic should know something of the powers used in aesthetic criticism and the various forms of enjoyment produced by works of literature. In the following sec- tions, therefore, we shall consider (1) the faculties of criticism, or Taste; and (3) the kinds of literary enjoy- ment, or the Pleasures of Taste. SECTIOlSr I. Taste. -^ 1. Definition of Taste. Taste is that power of the mind which enables us to feel and discern the merits and defects of any production which is designed to please. The word is borrowed from that sense of the tongue by which we distinguish and enjoy the flavors of food and drink. It is applied meta- phorically to an analogous faculty of the mind. Like the bodily sense from which the name is derived. Taste affords both pleasure and pain, but of a more refined and elevated character than that of the physical organ. Some of the most common deflnitions of taste may be appended. (1) Blair defines taste: " The power of receiving pleasure from the beauties of nature and art." This seems defective for two reasons: (1) Taste is as much offended by defects as it is gratified by exoej- lences; (2) taste is gratified by other than beautiful objects. (3) Alison defines it: "That faculty of the human mind by which we perceive and enjoy what is beautiful or sublime in the works of 138 THE ELEMENTS OF BHETOBIO. nature or art." To this definition there are, substantially, the same objections: (1) The sensitiveness to defects is overlooked; and (3) taste seems limited to the enjoyment of the sublime and the beautiful. (3) Coleridge says : " Taste is the intermediate faculty which con- nects the active with the passive powers of our nature, — intellei t with the senses, — and its appropriate function is to elevate the images of the latter, while it realizes the ideas of the former." The objections to this definition are: (1) It is questionable whether thei-e can be an intermediate faculty between the active and passive powers; and (2) this faculty is made out to be ioth active and pas- sive. Such a faculty would be needless, for it would be nothing more than the active and passive powers in co-operation. (4) Euskin says : " Perfect taste is the faculty of receiving the greatest possible pleasure from those material sources which are at- tractive to our moral nature in its purity and perfection." This is not strictly a definition of taste, but a description of the noblest taste. The definition given in the large print seems to avoid these diffi- culties. As will be shown, it is a function of taste to fed, and also to discern. As. a " power" may be active or passive, the definition does not assert that it is either. We shall find that it is both. The definition does not claim that taste is a distinct faculty of the mind. 2. Analysis of Taste. Taste is not a distinct faculty of the mind, but depends upon the co-operation of two powers : (1) sensibility, and (2) judgment. In an exercise of taste, sensibility is first and judgment second. For example, a beautiful poem is read in our hearing. We first feel a pleasurable emotion ; we then refer our pleasure to such a class and to such causes as judgment may decide proper. Or, if parts of the poem are of unequal merit, we distinguish by Judg- ment between the various emotions and their supposed causes as found in the several parts. FhiloBopheTB are not agreed with regard to the nature of taste. Some make it a distinct faculty. Hutohesou tliinks that it is in- GBITICISM. 139 dependent of every other faculty, performing for itself the functions of sensibility and judgment. This is equivalent to assuming that there is a mind within the mind. Hume, on the other hand, regards taste as a mere sensibility. Buskin seems also to hold this last opinion. Some subordinate taste to some one faculty. Tims Burke main- tains that taste is a function of perception ; and Akenside, that it is subsidiary to the imagination. Others consider taste as consisting wholly in the oo-operation of several powers. Such seems to be the meaning of the French philos- opher. Cousin, when he says: " Three faculties enter into that com- plex faculty that is called Taste, — imagination, sentiment, reason." There is, doubtless, a basis of truth in all the different theories. If any one will test himself in the presence of some beautiful object, he will find that he first feels that the object is beautiful, and after- ward tries to discern why it is. He may fail in his effort to ascertain the cause of his pleasure, but he has a tendency, which grows with the cultivation of taste, to analyze the object. 3. The Qualities of Taste. As taste is made up of two powers, sensibility and judg- ment, it has two qualities corresponding to these constitu- ents. These are (1) Delicacy, and (2) Correctness. (1) Delicacy of taste implies a more than ordinary sen- sitiveness of mind, as delicacy of touch implies a power to discriminate fine distinctions. (2) Correctness of taste demands accuracy of judgment according to the principles of taste, as correctness of opinion requires the power of comparing facts. •Each quality, to a certain extent, involves the other, and a high degree of both is frequently united in the same person. 4. Taste TJniversal. Taste is possessed by all men. Children at a very early age manifest an admiration for beautiful objects. The 140 THB ELEMENTS OF BUETOBIU rudest peasants delight in colored prints and painted images, and enjoy ballads and tales which are level with their comprehension. Even the lowest savages enjoy, to some extent, the beauty and grandeur of natural scenery, and are fond of decorating their persons with various or- naments. They admire an emotional and highly dramatic eloquence. 6. The Variation of Taste. Although taste is universal, it varies greatly both in delicacy and correctness. It is as various as the faces, languages, and characters of men. (1) It varies with age. Children are fond of bright colors, quick motions, simple melodies, and wonderful stories. As they advance in life they prefer more modest colors, more dignified movements, more exquisite har- monies, and more probable tales. The young are fond of the glowing and impassioned in oratory and the romantic in poetry. The aged prefer thoughtful and epigrammatic speech and didactic poetry. (3) It varies with races. The Oriental admires only the rich and ornate ; the European, the chaste and refined. In literature, the German prefers acuteness of thought and exactness of expression ; the Frenchman, delicate sentiment, brevity and beauty of phraseology. Similar differences of taste are exhibited in the architecture, painting, and sculpture of different nations. (3) It varies with epochs. The most ancient poems, as the Iliad, were full of mai'tial passion, expressing all the features of the heroic age. With the progress of (Mvilization, order, fitness, proportion, and unity became CRITICISM. 141 prominent, and were expressed in the dramas, lyrics, and orations of the classic age. With the introduction of chivalry, the blended sentiments of heroism, love, and religion produced a romance age. In like manner we may distinguish epochs of taste in every art. 6. The Standard of Taste/ As tastes are various, some maintain that there is no standard of taste, and adopt the ancient proverb, "De gustibus non disputandum est," "There is no disputing about tastes." If by a standard be meant a perfect mea- sure, such as the standard weights used in commerce, there is none in literature. If by a standard be meant some- thing by which we may decide what is excellent and what is defective, there is such a standard. Milton's " Paradise Lost," for example, is certainly a noble epic. "What is the standard by which it may be judged ? Is there any absolute ideal in the mind of man by which it may be exactly measured ? Apparently not, for it is not univer- sally regarded as a great epic. Some find no satisfaction in reading it ; many who derive pleasure from it, would enjoy something else much more. Nevertheless, the concurrent opinion of the majority of educated men declares that it is a great poem. In the concurrent opin- ion of the best judges we find the only standard of taste. This standard is not easily or immediately applicable to a work of literature, and. yet it is a real and the only uni- versal measure of literary excellence. Every age has its fashions in literature as well as in dress am\ manners. The writers who are most pleasing to. their generation are 142 THE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC. forgotten by the next. The history of literature reveals the fact that the works which are most permanent in their influence and are re- garded as classics by all generations, are not generally the most pop- ular at the time of their composition. On the other hand, the most fashionable productions rarely outlive their authors. The novel which half a nation discuss to-dayis scarcely read to-morrow. Time is an important element in deciding the merits of literary work. It is the verdict of all ages and all nations that the ancient classics are noble works of art. Shakespeare is admired in every country and in every age where his dramas are known. Yet the latest novel or the sensational play of the hour attracts more attention for the moment tlian the great masters of the past. Time alone can measure all competitors for lasting fame by the standard of concurrent opinion. This standard is like a great clock which does not faithfully indi- cate the passing moments, but peals out the hours with infallible precision. 7. The Claim of this Standard. The claim of coucurrent opinion to the dignity of a standard rests upon the fact that the fundamental element of taste is sensibility, and this is personal. Whatever is personal has authority only as it becomes universal, or, at least, general. For example, if any one should assert that salt and sugar have the same taste, we should deny his competency to Judge in such matters, and would declare that his sense was abnormal. As each person must say for himself whether or not he is pleased, that must be regarded as most pleasing which pleases most persons. To reject this principle is to affirm that each one's feeling is his only standard ; which is the same as to deny the exist- ence of any universal standard. This deference to others is altogether reasonable, and yet there is no appeal from our own feelings which can be wholly satisfactory. As Professor Torrey says: "We cannot reason or argue about what is beautiful, or the reverse. We pronounce a work of art great and admirable of its kind, without reference to the views or opinions of ORITICISM. 143 others ; I mean in a purely eesthetical judgment. Arguments to prove that it is so, or that it is not so, cannot alter our judgment any more than if it were purely subjective, as in the pleasures of sense. We may assent to such opinions and reasoning through modesty or diffidence, — but our judgment in fact remains unaltered. We either find the things immediately beautiful, or not at all." 8. Tlie Cultivation