mmt. \r\ ^.ror 3.%n>?^^ h'HWr Mi«l^ ^^!^^^^^^^ mm?r^'^ tufW^U. ^^^^m^r 'mim^ mmM^f^ CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THIS BOOK IS ONE OF A COLLECTION MADE BY BENNO LOEWY 1854-1919 AND BEQUEATHED TO CORNELL UNIVERSITY Cornell University Library BX1805 .T84 Papa conclaves, as they were and as the olin 3 1924 029 392 010 ax The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029392010 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. THE PAPAL CONCLAVES AS THEY WEEE AND AS THEY ARE. By T. ADOLPHUS TEOLLOPE AUTHOR OF "a DIBTOBY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF FLOEHNOE," "PAUL THE TOPE AND PAUL THE FBIAK," ETC., ETC. LONDON CHAPMAN AND HALL, 193, PICCADILLY ;876 OOKNtL U W I V liii^* I I^^' "Oh^^ resei-ved.] LOSDOX: P&IXTSD BY TIRTCE AND CO., LIMITED. CITY EOAD. V3 PREFACE. Never before, since a bishop's See was first estabKshed in Eome, wliether by St, Peter or another, has the "world at the period of the election of one Pope had so long a time in which to forget the election of his predecessor. St. Peter is said by tradition to have been bishop at Eome for twenty-five years. And no Pope of aU the two hundred and sixty who occupied the See between his death and the election of Pius IX. ever reigned so long as Peter, the longest reign having been that of Pius YI., who died iu 1799, after an incumbency of twenty-four years and eight months. The present Pope has already reigned more than thirty years ; and in the course of nature it cannot be long before the world will see yet one more Conclave, But not only will the coming Conclave be a newer thing to the world than ever was a Conclave before ; it will take place under circumstances very essentially differing from those under which all former Conclaves have been held, for the Pope is no longer a temporal sovereign. There exists no controlling cause why the Conclave which will elect the successor to Pius IX, should not VI PREFACE. be in every external circumstance the exact counterpart of tlie Conclaves wHcli have in these latter days pre- ceded it. There is nothing, and it may safely be predicted that there will be nothing, to prevent the enactment of all the pride, pomp, circumstance of a Conclave according to the description of the institution given in the following pages. The Italian Government, unless it be changed in spirit very much more entirely than appears in any degree likely to be the case, will most scrupulously respect and protect the perfect inde- pendence of the electoral proceedings of the Sacred College, and would respect and protect all the exterior ceremonial of the occasion, if the princes of the Church should think fit to give the world the spectacle of it. But such will not be the case. And such a change of spirit as would lead them to do so is quite as impro- bable as such a change in the disposition of the Italian Government as was just now alluded to. The Church is undeniably under a cloud at present (to shine forth in her own opinion ia undiminished splendour, when that temporary cloud shall have passed) ; and ia her displeasure she chooses, probably more fi'om policy than from temper, to pretend that the cloud is much heavier on her than it really is. She considers herself to be sitting in mourning and in captivity, and professes to be imable to "sing the Lord's song in so strange a land" as her own Eome has become to her. At least, she will not sing any portion of it with the wonted accompani- ments of stately splendour and ceremonial pomp. Eome will not, therefore, sec the old external circumstances and surroundings of a (Vniclavo. PREFACE. Vll But the internal and essential business of the election will, there can be little doubt, be transacted strictly according to the prescribed forms. And if any differ- ence shall be observed to exist in those respects "vrhieh have any real influence on the election, it will be found in this, that the civil governments of Europe will have — to use a vulgar but expressive phrase — ^much less say ia the matter than has heretofore been the case, and much less means of making any say which they may wish to utter, heard or attended to. The election will be, it may be predicted, an especially pure one — ^that is to say, it will be the real object of probably all the electors to choose the man whom they think to be the most fitted and the most capable of serving the interests of the Church as they are understood by the Eomish hierarchy. That there may be great differences of opinion among men all equally desirous of serving those interests, is exceed- ingly probable. But if there be, as it may be with tolerable certainty conjectured that there are, two cur- rents of opinion in the Sacred College on the great subject of the earnest desires of all its members, it is wholly impossible for the lay world — ^nay, it is probably impossible for their Eminences themselves — to predict which of these two currents is likely to prove the stronger in the Conclave. It is very possible that the future may have disclosed what it has ia store for us in this respect before these pages come beneath the eye of the reader. But be that as it may, and be the result of the election which gives a successor to Pius IX. what it may, the election of a Pope is stUl one of the most important events of con- Till PEErACE. temporary history, and one of tlie most pregnant with consequences of deep moment to a very large portion of the human race. And it can hardly be, therefore, but that some sufficient account of the mode in which a Pope becomes such, must have an interest for those who witness the close of the present, in all respects, excep- tional papacy. It can hardly be necessary to teU any reader that to attempt to write, or to pretend to have written, a history of all the Conclaves which have elected Popes within the compass of such a volume as the present, or of a dozen such, would be preposterous. The present writer has made no such attempt. What he has endeavoured to do has been to give an intelligible accoimt of the progress and growth of those abuses and encroachments, which led to the institution of the Conclave ; to sketch the successive modifications which have built up Con- clave law, as it now exists ; to show the impotence of all those modifying regulations to attain with any reality the objects they had in view ; to point out the reciprocal action of Popes and Conclaves on each other, and the influence of the general tendencies of the times on both ; to indicate very generally and summarily the successive changes which have passed over the spirit of the Papacy itself; to gi^-e such a detailed account of two or three selected Conclaves as might serve as speci- mens of the Conclaves of the ages from which they have been taken ; and, lastly, to give a brief account of the present method of proceeding in holding a Conclave. Possibly the subject is one in which the English reader may be interested to such an extent ; but I PEEFACE. IX hardly tliiiik that, even if all conditions of time and space had been favourable, a more lengthy resume of the tons of volumes ■which have been written on the subject would have been acceptable to the time-pressed British public of the present day. EoME, June 5th, 1876. CONTENTS. BOOK I. HIEEARCHY IN STATE OF FLVIDITY. CHAPTEE I. PAOB First Tentatives 3 CHAPTEE, n. Lateran Council of 1059. — Order of Cardinals. — Meaning of the Term. — First Traces of a Collegiate Body of Cardinals. — Number of the Cardinals. — Variations in this respect under different Popes. — "Titles" of the Cardinals. — Three Orders of Cardinals. — Numbers of Cardinals created by different Popes. — Motives for keeping up the Number in the Sacred College. — Cardinals in petto. — ^Anecdote of Alexander VIII. . 13 CHAPTEE III. Ceremonial connected with the Creation of Cardinals.- — Practice in the Earliest Ages. — Consultation of the College on the Subject. — Modern Practice. — Communication of his Creation to the new Cardinal. — His customary Duties thereupon. — Costume.^ — New Cardinal's Visit to the Vatican. — Patronage. — Ceremonial at the Apostolic Palace. — Speeches on the Occasion. — The " Beretta." — The new Cardinal's Reception. — ShuttiDg and Opening of the new Cardinal's Mouth. — Cardinalitial Eing. — Fees. — Ages at which Cardinals have been made. — Anecdotes of Odet de Coligny, the Heretic_Cardinal. — Laws restricting Popes a Dead Letter 29 CHAPTEE rV. Steps by ■which the Papal Election was attributed exclusively to the Sacred College. — Gradual Progress of Encroachment. — Abnormal Elections. — Early Kequisites for the Validity of an Election. — Earliest Examples of the Conclave. — Notable Conclave at Vjterbo in the thirteenth century. — First example of Election by " Compromise." — The Fifteen Eulea for a Papal Election made by Gregory X. — Basis of Conclave Legislation ever since .......... 54 Xll CONTENTS. BOOK II. NOSLE BOTS AT PLAY. CHAPTEE I. PAGE Latter Years of the Middle Ages, from Gregory X. to Pius IV.— Contrast of the Ecclesiastical World of those Days with Present Times.— Where Modem History commences in the Annals of the Papacy. — ^Variability of the Church. — Papal History falls into Groups of Popes. — Causes of this Phenomenon. — Paul III. the last of a Group of Popes. — Paul IV. the first of a different Group. — List of i'opes from 1271 to 1549 , . 75 CHAPTEE n. Election of Innocent V. — Anecdote of his Achievements as a Preacher. — Election of Adrian V. — Popes in the Thirteenth Century elected without Conclave. — Conclave in which Nicholas IV. was elected. — Mortality of Cardinals in Conclave. — Strange Inconsistency of the Anecdotist Cau- cellieri. — Superstition respecting the Duration of St. Peter's Reign. — Anecdote of the papal Physician Matthew Corte. — Election of Celestine V. — Modem Exception to the Rule requiring a Concla ve to be held. — Modifications of the early Conclave Rules. — Boniface Vill. — Benedict IX. — Anecdote respecting his Death. — Conclave held at Perugia. — Grossly Simoniacal Election. — Monstrous Assertion of the Historian Spondanus. — Morone, Gregory XlV.'s Barber. — The Babylonish Captivity of the Church. — Conclave at Avignon in 1334. — And again in 1342. — And in 1352. — And in 1362. — Division between the Gascon CardineJs Subjects of England, and those subject to France. — Election of Urban V. not a Member of the College. — Tentatives for restoring the Papacy to Rome. — Petrarch. — St. Bridget. — Conclave in 1370, the last at Avignon. — Gregory XI. — Difficulties of the Restoration of the See to Rome. — Return of Gregory XI. to Rome. — His Death in 1378 . 82 CHAPTER in. Sacred College at the Death of Gregory XI. — Anecdotes of the Conclave that elected Urban VX. — Turbulence of the Roman People.— Alarm of the Cardinals. — Circumstances which led to the great Schism. — Doubts respecting the Canonicity of the Election of Urban VI.— Other Causes leading to the Schism.— Irregular Election of Robert of Geneva by the dissenting Cardinals as Clement \ll., who has always been held to be an Antipopo. — Schism of thirty-nine Years ... .105 CHAPTEE IV. Conclaves during tlio Period of the S, hism.— Council of Pisa.- Abnormal and Irregular State of thiuKS in Uie Church.— Council of Constance.- Dcoioos which put an end to the Sihism, by the Election of Martin V. — Dillioultios arising from tho Action of the Council of Constance.— I hvw tlloct as regarding Modern Theories of lufallibilitv . 125 CONTENTS. xiii CHAPTEE V. PAGB Otto Colonna Pope as Martin V.— Conclave for tte Election of Eugenius IV. —Contest between Pope and Council.— Anecdote of the Deathbed of Eugenius IV. — Anecdotes of the Conclave that elected Nicholas V. Violence of the Roman Barons. — Prospero Colonna. — Cardinal Nephews. Election of Nicholas V.— Condition of Itaty. — Failure of the Attempt to unite the Latin and Greek Churches. — Nicholas a Patron of the new learning. — Other Doings of Nicholas.— Anecdote of his Mother. — Con- clave which elected Calixtus III. — Cardinal Bessarion. — Conclave which elected .ffineas Sylvius Piccolomini as Pius II.— Efforts of the Cardinal of Eouen to prevent the Election, and to secure his own. — Mode of Pius II.'s Election 132 CHAPTEE VI. Death of Pius II. — Decision to hold the Conclave in the Vatican. — Election of Paul II.— The Handsome Pope.— Election of Sixtus IV.— His Character. — Effect on the Church of the first menaces of Protestantism. — The all-devouring nepotism of Sixtus IV. — Peter Eiario, his Nephew. — Sixtus dies of a Broken Heart. — Epigrams on Sixtus. — Interregnum after the Death of Sixtus. — Conclave which elected Innocent VIII. — Anecdotes 154 CHAPTEE Vn. Interregnum after the Death of Innocent VIII. — Tumults. — Conclave which elected Borgia, Alexander VI. — His Reign and Death. — Scandalous Scene at his Burial. — Effect of his Papacy on the Church. — Interregnum after his Death. — Terrible Condition of Rome. — Conclave, and Scan- dalous Election of Pius III. — Another Conclave sixteen Days later. — Anecdotes of the Death of Pius III. — Simoniacal Arrangements for the Election of Julius II., Delia Rovere. — Character of Julius II. — Con- clave which elected Leo X. — Meeting and Demands of the Conclavists. — ;A Surgeon in the Conclave. — Anecdotes of this Conclave. — 'Election of De Medici as Leo X. — His Simoniacal Dealings. — Exhaustion of the Papal Treasury at his Death. — Difficulties of the Cardinals. — ^Election of Adrian VI. — ^Dismay produced in Rome by his Election. — Character of Adrian 170 CHAPTEE Yin. Conclave which elected Clement VII. — Change in the Characteristics of the Conclaves. — ^Anecdote of Adrian's narrow Escape from being killed, and of the hatred felt by the Roman Clergy against him. — Roman and Florentine rivalry in the Conclave. — Intrigues in the Conclave. — The Plan of Making a Pope by " Adoration." — Crafty Trick of Giulio de' Medici. — His Election. — And reign. — Conclave which elected Famese as Paul III. — Circumstances of hjB election. — His Character, . . 190 XIV CONTENTS. BOOK III. - THE ZEALOUS POPES. CHAPTER I. PAGE Eemarks of Eanbe on the Papal History of the Sixteenth Century.— Julius III. — His Character. — Conclave which elected him. — View of this Con- clave by the Venetian Ambassador. — Delay in Assembling of the Conclaves after Paul III.'s Death.— Eeginald Pole.— The Expectation that ho would be elected. — Was all but elected. — His own scruples. — His Election lost by them. — Anecdote of his behaviour in Conclave. — Cardinal di San Marcello, afterwards Pope as Marcellus II. — Deter- mined to elect Pole, if possible. — The Emperor appealed to by Letter. — He vetoes Cardinal Salviati. — Election of Del Monte as Julius III. — His Character 201 CHAPTEE n. llarcellua II. — His Character. — The Conclave which elected him — ^The Choice lies between him and Cardinal Caraffa. — Hostility of the Im- perial Party to the Latter. — The Meaning and Practice of " Adoration," "Acclamation," or "Inspiration." — Anecdote of intrusive Conclavist at a Scrutiny. — Election of Marcellus 11. — His Death, and Conduct at the Council of Trent 213 CH.\PTEE III. The C'cjnclave which elected Paul IV. — Imperialist Party. — Cardinal Pole. — Eesults in practice of the requirement of a two-thirds majority. — Cardinal Carpi excluded. — Cardinal D'Este. — Cardinal Morone.- Objec- tions to him. — Cardinal Pozzi. — Management of Famese. — Election of Paul rV. — Anecdote of the foeline; of Kome on the occasion.^Character of Caraffa, Paul IV. — Imperial "Veto" disregarded in this election. — Saying of Caraffa respecting his own elevation. — Estimate and descrip- tion of Paul by the Venetian Ambassador.— Giovanni Angelo Medici : his Family, Brother, Early Histoij. — Cliaratter and personal appear- ance of Medici, Pius IV.— The Inquisition.— Signs of the times,— Practice of giving complimentary votes.— Aneedoto of the craft of a Conclavist.— Cardinal Carpi again.— AMiy he was objectionaKe to D'Este.— Medici suddenly elected as a /»'« «//<•)• . . " . .221 CITAPTEP IV. Death ui I'ius 1"\'.— Closing nf tlie Council of Trout.— Kanke's Remarks on the work of the Council.— Action of the work of the Council on the tharaclci- of the Popes.- Anecdote of a plot to assjissinato Pius IV.— Michael Ghisliori: his nrilocodonts and character.— Char.ictor of the Election.— CoruLivo wbidi oliHtod PiusIV.— Rivalry between Cardinals Farnosii and Borromoo.— lupi csontativo of the old and of the new Umo. — CarJinal Altomps.— Anecdote of Borronioo at Floroiice.— Conclavist's \'iew of Borromeo's character. — Muroni's imprisonment and acquittal CONTENTS. XV PAaK on Charge of Heresy held in Conclave to he sufficient reason against his Election. — Borromeo wishes to elect him. — It is found impossible, however, to elect him. — Duplicity of Famese towards Borromeo. — Cardinals Ferrara and D'Eate hostile to Morofie, and why. — Famese and Borromeo agree to the Election of Ghislieri. — Dismay in Conclave at the result accomplished in the Election of Pius V 241 CHAPTEE V. Character and Disposition of Ugo Boncompagno is dominated hy the Spirit of the Age. — Felice Peretti, Sixtus V. — Saying attributed to him. — tTrban VII. — Sfondrato, Gregory XIV. — His Character and Practices. — Fachinetti, Innocent IX. — Aldobrandino, Clement VIII. — His Character. — Characteristics of the Conclaves that had elected these Popes. — Camillo Borghese, Paul V. — Conclave which elected him. — Principal Parties in it. — ^Their relative Strength, and the Manner in which it operated. — Attempt to elect Cardinal Saoli. — ^Anxiety of Aldobrandino's Party. — First Scrutiny. — Cardinal Bellarmine. — Cardinals Baronius and Borromeo. — ^Motives for putting forward Bellar- mine. — Negotiation between Baronius and Aldobrandino. — Cardinal Montalto at Supper. — Cardinal Camerino put forward, and dropped. — Cardinal San Olemente put forward. — Threatened "Esclusiva." — Cardinal Tosco put forward. — Meeting of Cardinals for the exclusioa of San Clemente 259 CHAPTEE VI. Continuation of the Conclave that elected Paul V.— Aldobrandino deter- mines to elect Cardinal Tosco. — Points for and against him. — Attempt to elect Tosco by "Adoration." — Montalto' s Indecision. — Eemarkable Scene in the Cell of Cardinal Acquaviva.— Conference between Aldobran- dino and Montalto.— The Latter unwillingly agrees to the Election of Tosco, which appears all but certain.— Suspense of Tosco.— Eemarkable Step taken by Baronius. — He alone by the Ascendancy of his Character prevents the Election of Tosco.— Baronius himself nearly elected.— The " Sala Kegia" in the Vatican. — Party Tactics thrown into Confusion. — Tosco's Disappointment.— Extraordinary Scene in the Sala Eegia and the Sistine and Paoline Chapels.- Borghese at length proposed by common Accord, and elected as Paul V 274 BOOK lY. TEE PRINCE POPES. CHAPTEE I. Close of the Era of the Zealous Popes.- Characteristics of the Group which succeeded them.-Death of Paul V.— Alexandre Ludovisi elected as Greeory XV. by the influence of Cardinal Borghese. — Ludovico Ludovisi, the Cardinal Nephew.— Eegulations of Gregory XV. for the holding of the Conclave.— Father Theiuer's Eemarks concemmg them. XYl CONTENTS, PAGI — Interregnnm, Description of.— Death of Gregory XV., and Entry of Cardinals into Conclave. — Conclave expected to be a long one, and why.— Parties in the Conclave.— Cardinal Saoli again. — Cardinal Delmonte. — Borromeo.— Cardinula Bandini, Ginnasio, and Madmzzi. — The Barberini Family.— Character of Maffeo Barberini, who became Urban VIII.— Cardinals Gaetani, Sacrato, and San Severino.- Illness in the Conclave of Cardinal Borghese.— He refuses to leave the Con- clave. — Barberini named in the impossibility of any other Election, and elected. — Terrible mortality of Cardinals and Conclavists . . 295 CHAPTEE n. Eoign and Works of Urban VIII. — Change in the Position of the Popes. — No more Possibility of obtaining Sovereignties for Papal Nephews. — Accumulation of wealth by the Papal Families. — Sixtus V. — Gregory XIV.— Clement VIII.— Paul V.— Gregory XV.— Urban VIII.— Amount of dotation permissible to a Papal Nephew. — Persecution of one papal family by another. — Conclave at the death of Urban. — Parties and interest at Rome much changed since the last Conclave. — Cardinal Pamphili elected as Innocent X. — The Barberini driven from Eome 3H CHAPTEE ni. Innocent X. — The Story of his Beign stands alone in Papal History. — Donna Olympia Maidalchinl, his Sister-in-Law. — Her Inflnence over him. — Her scandalous venality, greed, and corruption. — Scandal throughout Europe. — Innocent's futile Attempt to banish her. — Anec- dote of her dealings in the last hours of the Pope's life. — Innocent's Death. — A Conclave without any leaders. — The " Squadrone Volante." Anecdote of Cardinals Ottobuono and Azzolini. — Chigi proposed. — Opposed by the French interest. — The Barberini again. — Chigi elected as Alexander VII. — End of the story of Donna Olympia. — Pestilence at Eome ... 325 CHAPTEE IV. Fabio Chigi, Alexander VII. — His character. — His modified nepotism. — Difficulty of entirely abolishing nepotism. — Changing characteristics of the Papacy. — Dispute at the death-bed of Alexander. — Eospigliosi elected Pope as Clement IX. — His character. — The fluctuations in the population of liome. — Curious Connection between these phenomena and the decrease of nepotism. — Mixed motive of the Electors in the Conclaves of this Period. — Complaints of the decline of religion and morality in Eome. — Qualities now sought for in a Pontift". — Innocent XI. a really capable financier.— Conclave which elected Clement X. . 337 CHAPTEE y. CONTENTS. XVll _,, , . PAGE Ottobuoui.— Spada.— Bonvisi. — Vidoni. — D'Elci. — Celsi. — Litta.— Bonelli. — Altieri. — Nerli. — Bona. — Complaint by the Conclavist of the impiety of the Times 346 CHAPTER VI. No Chief of a party or party able to make Pope the man they most desired to elect. — Fear of enmity much more operative in the Conclave than enmity. — Multiplicity of considerations ever on the increase. — The Conclave -which elected Clement X. especially long and difiaoult. — Moderation of recent Popes as to nepotism operates to increase this. — Saying of the Princess Albani. — ^Abundant evidence in this Conclave that negotiations with a view to the election were not checked by the Bulls to that effect. — Searching the Dinners of Cardinals a mere Earce. — Odeschalchi all but elected. — Father Bona wishing to further his chance, injures it. — Why Cardinal Pio could not vote for Altieri. — Chigi fails altogether as Head of a Faction. — Anecdote of Cardinal Eazzi. — Message from the King of Spain to the Conclave. — Remarkable results of it. — ^Anecdote of Altieri on the Eve of his Election. — Election of Altieri. — Anecdote of De Ketz 365 CHAPTER Vn. Letters of the French President De Brosses. — Last Years of Clement XIL, Corsini. — Notices by De Brosses of the then Cardinals : of Cardinal Corsini, of Cardinal Albani, of Cardinal Coscia, of Cardinal Fleuii, of Cardinal Eohan, of Cardinal Tencin. — How Matters went in the Con- clave. — Tencin loses aU influence. — Proposal to elect Cardinal Aldro- vaudi opposed by Albani. — ^Albani's treacherous scheme to ruin Aldrovandi. — Albani's treachery ruins the chances of Cardinal Porzia. — Plain speaking of Cardinal Acquaviva. — Election of Lambertini as Benedict XIV. — His character and appearance. — Conclaves and Popes, sixteen in number, between that of Clement X. in 1670, and that of Pius IX. in 1846. — Saying of Cardinal Albani. — Characteristics of latter Popes 378 BOOK V. TSE CONCLAVE AS IT IS AT PRESENT. CHAPTER I. The death of a Pope. — Time to elapse before Conclave. — Cardinal Gays- ruck's Journey. — The Mode of constructing cells for the Conclave. — Localities in the interior of the Conclave. — Drawing lots for the ceUs. — Mode of fitting and furnishing the cells. — The cell of a Koyal Cardinal. The Camerlengo. — Mode of living of the Cardinals. — First day in Conclave 395 i XVlll COHTilNXS. CHAPTEE II. PAGE The Twenty rules of Gregory XV.— Signal for strangers to clear out.— Scale of payment of fees to servants and attendants in Conclave. — Death of a Cardinal in Conolare.— Business of each meeting of the Cardinals between the death of the Pope and the commencement of Conclave.— Entry into Conclave.— Bull of Pins VI. dispensing with certain formali- ties in the electipn of his successor.— Next Conclave in all prohabiHty will he quite regular 401 CHAPTEE ni. Three Canonical modes of Election. — Scrutiny and " Accessit." — Entry of the Cardinals into Chapel for the scrutiny. — Vestments. — Mode of pre- paring the Sixtine Chapel for the scrutiny. — The Seats of the Cardinals at the Scrutiny. — The " Sfumata." — How the day passes in Conclave. — The bringing of the Cardinals' dinners. — Cardinals heads of Monastic Orders. — Close of the day in Conclave 409 CHAPTEE IV. Mode of Procedure at the Scrutiny. — "Ante-scrutiny." — The Four Actions composing it. — Description of the voting papers. — The Eight Actions composing the Scrutiny more properly so called. — Infirm Cardinals. — The Manner of their voting. — Relatives may not be Conclavists. — How this rule is evaded. — The " Accessit." — The " Post-scrutiny." — Different procedure in case an election has or has not been accom- plished. — Care to ascertain that an elector has not made the necessary majority by voting for himself. — Cases of conscience as regards the voting. — Objects intended to be ensured by Conclave rules impossible of attainment. — Conclusion 418 BOOK I. HIERARCHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. BOOK I. HIEBABCHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. CHAPTEE I. Pirst Tentatives. The isystem by -wliicli th.e Pope appoints a body of men wbo become tbe electors of a new Pope has not been invented, but has grown. Like other social systems and arrangements which have succeeded ia establislung themselves in the world as durable institutions, it grew, and shaped itself as it grew, in accordance with the nature and tendencies of the body social out of which it sprung. The manner in which this system has acted for the effecting of the purposes for which it was intended has been exceedingly curious, very peculiar, and charac- teristic of the institution of which it became an impor- tant part; often very dramatic, always highly iateresting, not only to the student of ecclesiastical history but to the observer of human nature; and not unfrequently, both in past and present times, iufluential in the highest degree on the contemporary history of Europe. It may B 2 4 THE PAPAL CONCLATES. be supposed, therefore, that some brief account of the method and working of this singular and unique institu- tion, as it has been shaped by circumstances and human passions, might be not unacceptable to many the course of whose reading lies far out of the track which would make these matters necessarily familiar to them. A brief account it must be, though the story of several of the Conclaves might be so told separately as to occupy a volume as large as this, perhaps neither unprofitably nor unamusiugly. But it is much if those whose special studies do not lead them in this direction can find time to read one small volume on the entire subject. It were useless to hope for more. It is the purpose of this volume, then, to give such a general account of the working of the system by which for more than fifteen centuries the Popes have been chosen, as may be, it is hoped, made interesting to the general reader. as distinguished from the special student. To the latter the present writer makes no pretence of ofi'ering anything that he does not already well know. As in the case of other institutions which have grown up by a process of development and endogenous growth, the beginnings of this institution were rudimentary, irregular, confused, and uncertain. Much that in the course of generations became fixed, legalised, and in process of time fossilised, was in the beginning in a fluid and plastic condition. And the uncertainty and confused natui-o of the development in question was all the more marked in that it was in cAcry respect abusive. It was, in truth, as has been said, a development, an endogenous growth, and natui-al outcome of the HrEEARCHT IN STATE OP FLXTTDITT, 5 system from which, it sprung. But none the less was the progress of its growth at every stage abusive, and iu contradiction to the origiual and true priaciples of the body which developed it. There are organisms the most natural and most to be expected development of which is one in contradiction to the organic priaciples they profess. And it may probably be considered that the greatest social organism which the world has ever seen, the Catholic Church, may be one of these. It wUl be expedient, therefore, to trace very briefly the course of those events and arrangements which led to the defini- tive organisation of the Conclave, as the means by which a successor to St, Peter was to be provided. And that will be the business of this first book. It has ever been a claim of the Catholic Church that it is the most democratic society that the world has yet 4seen. Logical accordance with the principles inculcated by its Founder and with the purposes for which it exists would require that it should be such. And the theory of the institution has at no time failed iu accordance with those priaciples and ptirposes. Nor can it be denied that the practice of the Church has been ia every age to a great extent in conformity with its theory in this respect. If, at all times — and certainly not less so iti these later days than in older and less decency-loving times — the door of admission to the higher places and dignities of the Church has been more freely and more easily opened to the great and powerful ones of the earth, yet there has been no age from the earliest to the present ia which its places of power, wealth, and dignity, ia every grade, have not been accessible to the lowliest. 6 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. If the present Pope be the scion of a noble house, his immediate predecessor had been a peasant-bom friar. Nevertheless, although the Church has, to a great extent, preserved its characteristic democratic tendencies as regards its relations with the lay world outside the priestly pale, it is a curious and significant fact that the policy of its own internal arrangements and government has continually tended to become ever more and more aristocratic, oligarchic, and despotic. It has been the conscious policy as well as the self-acting tendency of the institution to deliver every lower grade in the hierarchy ever more and more stringently bound into the power of its immediate superior. Parochial clergy have been more and more entirely subjected to their bishops ; and bishops have been effectually taught to submit, not only their conduct, but their souls, to the great central despot at Rome. And the strength of this tendency, most vigorous in that centre ganglion of the system, has singularly mani- fested itself there by the invention of an entirely adventi- tious order of ecclesisastic nobles — the Sacred College. And the scope and aim of this invention has been to turn the original Apostolic Church democracy into one of the closest oligarchies the world has ever seen, as regards the highest purposes of ecclesiastical government. Ecclesiastical theory recognises the Bishop of Eome as the universal Metropolitan of Christendom, because he is the successor in that see of the apostle to whom Christ said, " Tu es Petrus, et super banc petram sedificabo ecclesiam mcam ! " And the circumstance that Rome was the seat of empire and centre of the civilised world has produced coincidence between that theory and historic HIERARCHY IN STATE OF FLTTIDITY. 7 fact. It has been denied by historical inquirers of polemic tendencies that St. Peter ever was Bishop of Eome, or present there at all. I think, howeyer, that it must be admitted that the balance of evidence, though certainly not reaching to historic proof, is in favour of the truth of the facts as claimed by Eome. But in truth, the whole story of the early days of the Church at Eome, including the dim and shadowy names of the Pontiffs who are chronicled as having succeeded each other in the seat of Peter, is ia the highest degree legendary. Nor have we any means of knowing by what process it was settled among the faithful that the man who became their bishop should be such. Tor twelve hundred years indeed after the first establishment of the see of Eome, though the chronological place and identification of the majority of the Popes is sufficiently clear and satisfactory, the succession is in many iustances so obscure, and so far from being historically ascertained that the immense amount of learning that has been expended on the subject has not availed to bring the learned disputants to a common understanding on the subject, or to produce any intelligible and trustworthy line of papal succession. The main difficulty of the matter arises from the number of Antipopes, and the exceedingly obscure questions which arise as to many of these whether he is to be con- sidered as Pope or Antipope. From all which it wiU be readily understood that little can be said with any degree of certainty as to the method of Papal election during those centuries. There is' every reason to think that in the earliest times the bishop was chosen by the voices of all the faithful belonging to that " Church"— to the 8 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. society, that is, of tlie Christians who lived there. Ecclesiastical historians are anxious to maintain that from the earliest time the clergy alone had the privilege of voting on the subject, while the people were only asked for their consent to the choice thus made. Not all even of the orthodox writers on the subject insist on this ; and it is far more probable that the Eoman Bishop was in the earliest ages chosen by the whole body of the faithful, and that most likely by some more or less fixed and orderly process, not in perfect accordance with any regular system of votation. We thus find Boniface I., who had reason to fear that the peace of the Church might be troubled after his death by the turbulence of an Antipope, one EulaUus, writing in 419 to the Emperor Honorius a letter, in which he enjoins on him that no one should be elected Pope by means of intrigues, but that he only should be considered the legitimate Pope who should be chosen by Divine judgment and with the consent of all.* The vague nature of this recommendation is sufficiently indi- cative of the uncertain and unregulated practices that prevailed in the election. The address of this letter to the Emperor, moreover, and the reply of the latt4?r, mark the fact that the Emperors had abeady begun to exercise a more or less admitted and recognised influence over the pontifical elections. A few years later, in 401, St. Hilarius finds it necessary to decree that no Pope shall appoint his own successor. In 499 St. Symmaolius, in a council held at Eome, and attended by seventy-two bishops, decrees that he shall be accepted as Pope who '"^ Labile, Concil., loni. iii. col. 1582. HIEEAECHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 9 shall have united all the suffrages of the clergy, or at least of the greater part of them. In this same brieff we find the earliest promulgation of a rule which sundry later Pontiffs, notably Paul IV., ia 1558, confirmed and made more striagent, and which to the present day is held as one of the fundamental and most important rules of all connected with the election of a successor to St. Peter. It provides that while the Pope lives no nego- tiation or conference shall take place with regard to his successor, and this under paia of excommunication and forfeiture of all offices. At the death of Symmachus, we find Odoacer publishing a law, given by Labbe under the year 502 (Concil., torn. iv. col. 1334), by which he forbids any pontifical election to be proceeded with without the participation in the deliberations of himself or a pretorian prefect on his behalf. The barbarian king, however, alleged that Symmachus had requested him to take this step; and the ecclesiastical historians admit that some such request may have been made, but assert that Odoacer availed himself of it to usurp a power which it had never been intended to confer on him. As late as 1072 we find the election of Gregory VII., the great Hildebrand, promulgated ia the following terms : " We, the cardinals of the holy Eoman Church, and the clergy, acolytes, subdeacons, and priests, in the presence of the bishops and abbots and many other personages ecclesiastical and lay, this day, the 21st April, 1072, ia the church of St. Peter in Vincula, elect as the true Vicar of Christ the Archdeacon Hildebrand, a person of much learniag," &c., &c., &c., "and we will that he * Labbe, Concil., torn. iv. col. 1313. 10 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. should have that same authority in the Church of God which St. Peter exercised over that same Church by the will and ordinance of God." * In short, for more than a thousand years the elections of the Eoman Pontiffs got themselves accomplished in all sorts of varying and irregular ways, as best might be, with now more and now less attention on the part of the electors to the real, or at least professed, objects and nature of the office, and now more and now less intervention of corruption within the Chiirch and high-handed lay violence from without. In process of time, as the number of clergy became very much larger, and disorders in the proceedings at the papal elections became more serious, it was thought desirable before the close of the eleventh century to determine that the election of the Bishop of Eome should be entrusted to the leading priests in Eome — " preti primari " — and the bishops of the immediately neigh- bouring sees exclusively. The variations of practice during the five hundred years previous to this date, 1072, are chronicled by Moroni, t who counts up eighteen different methods used during this period in the process of election. It will hardly be deemed necessary that the points of difference which characterize these eighteen modes of election should be registered here. It will be sufficient to say that the general tendency of them all was to place the power of election in the hands of a small clerical oligarchy, and to exclude the lay element, especially as represented by crowned heads, from any participation iu * Baronius, ad an. 1074. Labbe, torn. x. col. 6. f Dizionario di Erudizione Storico-eoclcsiastica, vol. xxi. p. 199. HIEEAECHT IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 11 it. It cannot be denied that this restriction, and the practice and claim which grew out of it, were justified, and it may almost be said necessitated, by the circum- stances of the time and the nature of the case. It is no doubt a monstrous thing that a handful of Eoman priests should possess the privilege and right of nomiaating an individual to exercise such a power in Christendom as that of the Popes grew to be. And though the more modem practice of selecting the members of the Sacred College from a much larger field, whUe adhering nominally to the ancient practice by virtue of the titles still assumed by the cardinals, may be held to have greatly modified the crude excess of the pretension as it was originally put forth, it is still an outrageous claim that the creature of such a body as the Sacred CoUege should exercise such authority as is attributed to the Pope over the entire body of the Church, which claims to be de jure co-extensive with the world. But it may be safely assumed that neither the better nor the worser men of the curiously heterogeneous band of admirable saints and turbulent self-seeking sinners which con- stituted the Eoman clergy of that time had any clear notion of the greatness of the thing they were arrogating to themselves. And it is at the same time very difficult, whether from the standpoint of the fifth or that of the fifteenth century, to imagine any scheme by which the end to be attained could have been on the whole more advantageously reached. It may be admitted further, that (though the circumstances which determined and finally fixed the pontifical election in the method which it has followed for more than a thousand years will 12 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. doubtless be eventually found to operate, like tbe canker at the root of a widely-branching tree, to the ultimate destruction of the institution) the amount of success which has been achieved by an arrangement so little promising in its appearance is one of the most interesting and curious problems which the history of the world offers to the statesman and sociologist. CHAPTEE II. Lateran Council of 1059. — Order of Cardinals. — ^Meaniag of th.eTerm. — First Traces of a CoUegiate Body of Cardinals. — Number of the Cardinals. — Variations in this respect under different Popes "Titles" of the Cardinals. — Three Orders of Cardinals. — Numbers of Cardinals created by different Popes. — Motives for keeping up the Number in the Sacred College. — Cardinals in petto. — ^Ajiecdote of Alexander Vill. The first step towards arriying at a fixed oligarclueal method of election had, however, been taken somewhat before that election of the great Hildebrand as Gregory YII. in 1073. In the year 1059 Pope Nicholas II. had been raised to the throne in fact by the influence of Hildebrand, whose commanding figure stands forth during all this period as the real and effective ruler of the Church. This Nicholas had in the previous year held a council at the Lateran, by a decree of which he expressly deprived the general body of the clergy and the Eoman people of any share in the pontifical elections for the future.* " The right of electing the Pontiff," so runs the decree, " shall belong in the first place to the cardinal bishops, then to the cardiaal priests and deacons. Thereupon the clergy and the people shall give their consent ; in such sort that the cardinals shall be the promoters, and the clergy and the people the followers." In the same decree Pope Nicholas orders, * Labbe, Concil., torn. is. col. 1013. 14 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. that tlie futiire Pontiffs shall be chosen ''from the bosom of the Eoman Church" (which means, say the ecclesiastical writers, "from among the cardinals"), if a fitting person shall be found among them ; and if not, from the clergy of any other church. He further orders that, "if it should happen that the election cannot by reason of some impediment be made in Eome, it may be performed elsewhere by the cardinals, even though there should be but few of them." Here we arrive at some degree of fixity in the attri- bution to the cardinals of the exclusive right to elect the Pope. We do not quite yet emerge from the fluid state of the hierarchical institution ; for further decrees were necessary and further vicissitudes had to be undergone before the solid condition of the institution is reached. But all the further changes and the decrees of subsequent Popes regard only the manner in which the cardinals are to carry out the task entrusted to them. It may be proper, then, here to explain as briefly as may be the origin and meaning, so far as it had any meaning, of the order of cardinals. The dire necessity which constrains every wonder- fully learned Dryasdust to find some different solution for his erudite problems from that suggested by his predecessor Dryasdust, has caused various more or less fanciful explanations of tlic origin of the term cardinal, as the title of an ecclesiastical prince, to bo put forward. There seems, however, to bo little room for doubt that the simplest of these is the true one. Cardo is the Latin for a hinge. The cardinal vii-tucs are those upon which the character of a man mainly hinges, and are, HIEBAECHY IN STATE OP FLUEDITT. 15 therefore, the principal virtues. " Cardinals " are then principal priests. At all events Pope Eugenius IV., writing in 1431, supposed this to be the origin and meaning of the word. He calls the cardinals those on whom all the government of the Church hinges. " Sicut per cardinem volvitur ostium domus, ita super hoc sedes Apostolicse totius Ecclesise ostium quiescit et susten- tatur." Some antiquaries have endeavoured to show that the term is used as early as the second century. This seems doubtful.* But it is certaia that the word was in common use iu the fifth century. Various prin- cipal and leading priests were then called " cardinals." But the name had not yet come to have the signification * Bingtam, ■when pointing out that archipresbyteri were by no means the same thing aa preabyieri cardinaXes (book ii. chap. 19, sec. 18), says that the use of the term cardinal cannot be fouad in any genuine writer before the time of Gregory the Great, i.e. the close of the sixth century. "For," says he, "the Roman Council, on which alone Bellarmine relies to prove the word to have had a great antiquity, is a mere figment." I retranslate from the Latin translation of Bingham, .not having a copy of the original English to refer to. Nevertheless, whether Bellarmine cites them or not, there are a few other authorities for the earlier use of the term. See Moroni, voc. Cardinal. In alluding {loc. cit.) to the origin of the term, Binghaia notices the opinion of Bellarmine, that the word was first applied to certain prin- cipal churches, and remarks, that others have supposed that those among the priests in populous cities, who were chosen from among the rest to be a council for the bishop, were first called cardinals. And he cites StOlingfleet, who writes, in his "Irenicon" (part ii. chap. 6): "When afterwards these titles were much increased, those presbyters that were placed in the ancient titles, which were the chief among them, were called cardinales preshfteri, which were looked on as chief of the clergy, and therefore were the chief members of the council of presbyters to the bishop." The title, however, seems to have been applied to the entire body of the canons in certain churohes, as a privileged use allowed to those special sees. As to the above-mentioned council said to have been held at Rome by Sylvester I. in 324, it is regarded as authentic by Baronius as well as Bellarmine, and is judged to be apocryphal by Van Espen. 16 THE PAPAL CONCLATES. it subsequently acquired. The canons of various cathe- dral chapters, notably those of Milan, Eavenna, Fermo, Cologne, Salerno, Naples, Compostella, &c., were grati- fied with the appellation of cardinals. There are pas- sages of ancient writers from which it appears clear that at one period all the clergy of the Eoman churches were called "cardinals." In Prance those priests em- pow;ered to hear confessions and give absolution seem to have been called " cardinals."* In fact the use of the word, and the practice in assuming and conceding the title, seems to have been, like so much else in those ages, exceedingly vague. Nor for a long time was the restriction of the title to the class which now alone uses it decisive and fixed. It appears gradually to have been understood to appertain only to those whom the Pope specially created cardinals. At last, in 1567, Pope Pius Y. definitively f decreed that none should assume the name or title of cardinal save those created such by the Eoman Pontiff ; and fi-om that time to the present day the name has been ex- clusively applied to the body of men who are now so called. Thus much for the name. That the dignity existed in such sort, that the cardinals of the Eoman Church, or rather of the Church at Eome, were deemed of far * Cave, writing of Anastasius the Eoman librarian (vol. ii. p. 56. col. 2.), says that he was ordained by Leo IV. about the year 848 presbyter of the titular church of St. Marcellus, and quotes the words of Pope Leo : "Presbyter cardinis nostri quern nos in titulo, B. Marcelli Martyris atque Pontiiicis ordinavimus." That is to say, continues Cave, that that church was specially intrusted to him, that ho might continually be busied in the care of it, " Tanquam janua in cardine suo," and so com- monly called a cardinal. ■)- Moroni, Dizionario, tom. ix. p. 247. HIERAECHY IN STATE OE PLTJIDITT, 17 superior rank and dignity to those of any other cliurcli, ■who more or less abnsiTely called themselves by that name, at least several centuries earlier, has been suffi- ciently seen. But it does not appear that the idea of the Sacro Collegio — of a collegiate body composed of the cardinals, and of them alone — arose till long after the earliest mention of cardinals. It is said that traces of such a conception may be found in the life of Leo III., created in 795, which is extant by Anastasius. Moroni cites a variety of writers and documents of the centuries between that date and the end of the eleventh century, for the purpose of showing that at all events by the end of that time the body of cardinals was recognised as a collegiate corporation. And he then proceeds, " Having fixed the epoch at which the cardinals were known even by name as the Sacred College," &c. But in fact his citations show nothing of the sort, and appear to me to indicate rather the reverse. At all events he fails to adduce any instance in which the phrase in question is used.* Nor have I been able to discover when the body of cardinals was first so called. The institution, indeed, seems to have continued in a very fluid state till a much later date. And it is not till Sixtus Y., by the Bull Postquam, dated the 3rd of December, 1585, finally * "The institution o£ cardinals properly so called," says Cave, "is referred to the middle of this century — the eleventh. There were indeed cardinals in the Eoman Church before this, that is to say, clerks fixed in and taking titles from the more celebrated churches of the city. Nor ■were cardinals -wanting in others of the most important churches. But about this time they "were enrolled— asciW sunt — ^in an Apostolic College, as counsellors of the Pope, assistant judges — conjudices — senators of the city and the world, time hinges of the world— ©eri mundi cardines." — Cave, Scrip. Ec. Hist. Lit., torn. ii. p. 124, col. 2. 18 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. regulated the composition of the Sagro Collegio, tliat we find ourselves on solid ground. Tip to this time not only was the number of cardinals exceedingly variable in fact, but the theory of what the number ought to be, as far as any theory existed on the subject, was equally uncertain. Thus John XXII., when requested to create two French cardinals in 1331, replied that there were only twenty cardinals, that seventeen of these abeady were Frenchmen, and that he could therefore only con- sent then to create one French cardiaal. AjoA at the death of Clement YI. in 1352, the cardinals determined that their number should not exceed twenty. Urban VI. {oh. 1389) created a great number ; and the College made representations to Pius II. {oh. 1464), to the effect that the dignity of the purple was diminished by such excess. Sixtus IV. {oh. 1484), however, multiplied the number of his creations to a hitherto unexampled degree. And Alexander VI. {oh. 1503), who di'ove a very lucrative trade iu cardinal-making, exceeded him. But Leo X. {oh. 1521), haviug no regard, as we are told, for all that had been said or done by his predecessors, created thii'ty-one cardinals at one batch. He created iu aU forty-two in the short space of eight years and eight months, and left at his death no less than sixtj--five, a number unprecedented up to that day. Paul III., how- ever, the Farncse Pope {oh. 1540), created seventy-one. But Paul IV. {oh. 1550), after consulting the Sacred College, issued the Bull called Conqhtvlnui^ by which it was decreed that the number of cardinals should never henceforward exceed forty, and that no new cardinal should bo created till the cxistiug number had fallen to HIEEAECHT IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 19 at most thirty-nine. Despite this, however, his imme- diate successor Pius IV- (oi. 1565) raised the number of the cardinals to forty-six. Finally Sixtus Y. (oi. 1590) established, by the Bull mentioned above, seventy as the fixed number — i.e. the maximum number — of the College, " after the example of the seventy elders appoiated by God as counsellors of Moses." And this number has never since been exceeded, and may be considered at the present day as representing the complement of the Sacred College, though it is expressly laid down by the authorities on the subject that no canonical disability exists to prevent the Pope from exceeding that number if he should see fit to do so. By the same Bull, Postquam, of 1585, Sixtus V. also determined that the seventy of the Sacred College should consist of six cardinal bishops, fifty cardinal priests, and fourteen cardinal deacons. The first are the bishops of the sees immediately around Eome. The deacons take their titles from the diaconie, es- tablished in the earliest centuries, and attached to certain churches, for the assistance and support of the widows and orphans of the faithful ; and the cardinal priests take theirs from the most noted, venerable, and ancient of the parish churches in Eome. As mistakes are frequently made about the assump- tion and " choice " of their titles by newly-created cardinals, it may be as well here to give a list of the titles, or sees or churches, after which the cardinals are designated. The cardinal bishops are the holders of the sees of— 1, Ostia and Yelletri; 2, Porto and St. Euflna; 3, Albano; 4, Frascati; 5, Palestrina; c 2 20 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. 6, Sabina, The fifty " titular " churclies are St. Lorenzo in Lucina, St. Agostino, St. Alessio, St. Agnes, St. Anastasia, Saints Andrew and Gregory on Monte Celio, the Twelve Apostles, St. Balbina, St. Bartholomew in the Island, St. Bernard at the Diocletian Baths, St. Calistus, St. Cecilia, St. Clement, St. Chrisogonns, St. Cross of Jerusalem, St. John at the Porta Latiaa, Saints John and Paul, St. Jerome of the Slaves, St. Laurence in Damaso, St. Laurence in Panispema, Saints Marcel- linus and Peter, St. Marcellus, St. Mark, St. Mary of the Angels, St. Mary of Peace, St. Mary of Victory, St. Mary of Piazza del Popolo, St. Mary in Axacoeli, St. Mary in Traspontina, St. Mary in Trastevere, St. Mary in Yia, St. Mary sopra Minerva, Saints Nereus and Achilleus, St. Onophrius, St. Pancras, St. Peter ia Montorio, St. Peter in Yincula, St. Prassede, St. Prisca, St. Pudenziana, the Pour Crowned Saints, Saints Quiricus and Julietta, St. Sabina, Saints Sylvester and Martin on the Hill, St. Sylvester in Capite, St. Sixtus, St. Stephen on Monte Celio, St. Susanna, St. Thomas in Parione, the Holy Trinity on Monte Pincio. The fourteen deaeonries are as follows : St. Mary in Tia Lata, St. Adrian in the Porum, St. Agatha alia Subm-ra, St. Angelo in Peschiera, St. Cesaroo, Saints Cosmo and Damian, St. Eustache, St. George in Telabro, St. Maiy ad MavtjTCS, St. Mary dcUa Scala, St. Maiy in Aquho, St. Mary in Cosmcdin, St. Mary in Dominica, St. Mary in Portico, St. Nicholas ia CiU'cere, Saints Yitus and Modcstus. As regards these different orders of cardinals, it may bo said that for most practical piu-poscs, specially for all HIEEARCHT IN STATE OP FLUIDITY. 21 purposes of tlie election of a Pontiff, they are in modem times equal. All have an equal vote. All are equally eligible ; but are not, as is often imagined, exclusively eligible. Any fit and proper person, wbom tbe cardi- nals may in tbeir consciences tbink tbe most likely to rule tbe Cburcb to tbe greater glory of Grod and welfare of bis Cburcb, may be elected. It is bardly necessary to say tbat sucb person bas almost invariably been found among tbe members of tbeir own body, and tbat tbere is not at tbe present day tbe smallest probability tbat any other should be chosen. One important point of difference tbere is between the cardinal deacons and their colleagues. The former need not be in full and irrevocable holy orders. But as regards the choice of the Pope and the business of the Conclave, this difference signifies nothing. Should a cardinal deacon be chosen Pope, he must receive priest's orders. Since the time of Sixtus Y., at the close of the sixteenth century, there have never been more than seventy cardinals at the same time. But inasmuch as the great majority of those promoted to that dignity are men far advanced in life, the succession is somewhat rapid; and it is recorded that Clement VIII. {oh. 1605), during a pontificate of thirteen years, created fifty-three cardinals. Paul V. {oh. 1621), during his reign of fifteen years, made sixty. Urban YIII. {oh. 1644) advanced no less than seventy-three persons to the purple, besides four left in petto * at his death, thus entirely renewing the Sacred College during bis pon- tificate of twenty years. This Urban VIII. was the * This phrase will he explained at a future page. 22 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. great BarLerini Pope, wliose zeal for tlie faith, is seen in the celebrated College de Propaganda Fide, and whose nepotism may be read in the vast Barberini palace and galleries and collections, and in the great number of buildings stiU marked by the bees, which were his cognizance. This was the man who stripped the bronze from the dome of the Pantheon to turn it into a canopy for the tomb of St. Peter, who used the Coliseum as a stone quarry for his building operations, and was the barbarian of whom scandalized Eome said, " Quod non fecerunt barbari, id fecere Barberini !" Nevertheless, this notable Pope, whose "creations" in stone and mortar were about as numerous as those ia "purple," was almost equalled in the latter respect by several of his successors. Clement XI. (pi. 1721), during a pontificate of twenty years, created seventy cardinals. Benedict XIV. {oh. 1758), during his reign of seventeen years, made sixty-four; and Pius YI. [oh. 1799), in the course of his pontificate of twenty-fom* years and eight months (the longest reign in all the long list till it was surpassed by that of the pre^nt Pope), siKty-three. Thus Urban YIII. (Barberini) would have remained on record as the most prolific creator of cardinals, were it not that Pius VII., during his papacy of twenty-thi-ee years and five months— the next longest to that of his predecessor Pius VI. — created no less than ninety-eight, besides leaving ten in petto at his death — a number which is the more remarkable from the fact, that, by reason of the dis- turbed condition of the times and the misfortunes occasioned to the world by the first French Empire, HIERAHCHY IN STATE OF FLXTIDITT. 23 he was not able to create any cardinal from the 26th. of March, 1804, to the 8th of March, 1816. The number of creations due to Pius IX. will no doubt be large ; but it is hardly likely, though his reign has been so much longer, that he will reach the number of Pius VII. It may be observed, howeyer, that it has not been without some show of good reason that the later Popes have been desirous of leaving a weU-filled CoUege of Cardinals at their death. The smallness of the number of Cardinals in Conclave has frequently been the occa- sion of difficulty in coming to an election, and consequent long dxiration of the Conclave — a circumstance which has always been held to be, and may readUy be believed to be, injurious to the Church. In old times, indeed, when the period during which the Holy See remained vacant was one of utter anarchy and lawlessness in Eome, it was a matter of the highest importance that the election should be made as quickly as possible. And even in more recent times, a prolonged Conclave was always the cause of disorders both in Eome and to a certain degree in the Church generally. It may also well be believed that scandalous elections and simoniacal bargainings and promises were much more likely to occur in a College composed of but a small number of individuals. Having had occasion to speak of the creation of cardinals in petto, it may be as weU to take this op- portunity of explaining the meaning of that phrase, before proceeding to speak of those regulations, customs, and specialties which are essential to a sufficient under- 24 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. standing of the nature of the august body to wHch the making of the Pope is entrusted. Yarious causes occasionally arose to lead a Pontiff to deem it undesirable to name openly to the world the person whom it was his wish and purpose to create a cardinal. Sometimes the opposition, or at all events the discontent, of some one among the sovereigns of Europe, sometimes jealousies and ill-wiU among the members of the Sacred College themselves, and some- times the consideration that the individual to be promoted might for a time be more serviceable to the Holy See in the less exalted dignity from which he was to be elevated to the pm-ple, induced the Pontiff to keep his nomination secret. Martin V. {oh. 1431) was the first who thus created cardinals in secret. And the usage as practised by him and sundry of his successors is to be distinguished from the subsequent plan of creating in fetto to which it led. Pope Martin created in one batch fourteen cardinals, naming and publishing only ten, and confiding in secret Con- sistory to the members of the Sacred College the names of the other four, who were thus secretly created but not published. The Pope further took the precaution of confirming his secret nomination in a subsequent Consistory, and not only strictly enjoined the cardinals to pubUsh the creation of the persons in question and to consider them as cardinals in case he, the Pope, should die without having published them, but made llieiu swoar solemnly that tliey would do so. The case the Pope liiid looked forward to happened. Martin died without liiiviug publisluMl lht> names of the cardinals HIERAECHT IN STATE OF FLTJIDITT, 25 thus secretly created. But tlie College, their promises and oaths notwithstanding, refused to recognise the persons in question as cardinals, or allow them to take any part in the election of the new Pope. In some similar cases, the succeeding Pope created afresh the secretly named cardinals of his predecessor out of regard for his memory. In more cases, those who remained unpublished when their patron died never obtained the purple. The cardinals themselves always set themselves strongly against these secret nomina- tions. But as time went on the absolutism of the Popes always went on increasing, and the power of the cardinals to resist it diminishing. And Paul III., the Farnese {oh. 1549), a very powerful and high-handed Pontiff, pushed the practice of secret nomination a step in advance. Up to that time the Popes had always named the cardinals whose promotion they were un- willing to publish in secret Consistory, taking the Sacred College into their confidence. Paul simply declared that besides those named as cardinal there were one or two others, as the case might be, whose names he reserved in Ms own hreast {in petto), to be named when he should think proper. And, further, it became the practice for a cardinal created in this fashion to take precedence in the College according to the date of his secret nomination, whereas previously the secretly named cardinals had taken rank according to the date of the publication of their dignity. The form used at present in the practice of this secret nomination is as follows. The Pope in Consistory, after 26 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. naming those wtom he publicly creates, adds, ''Alios duos [or more or less] in pectore reservamus, arbitrio nostro quandocumque declarandos." The Popes, however, have never succeeded in obtaining with any degree of certaiaty the recognition of cardinals thus made if they should be surprised by death before the publication of them. Sometimes they have been allowed to take their places in the Sacred College. Sometimes their title to do so has been rejected. More frequently, perhaps, than either, the succeeding Pope has given them admission to the College by a nomination of his own. It is now, however, a recognised maxim of the Eoman Curia that no Pope on succeeding to the see of St. Peter is in any wise bound to recognise any nominations left by his pre- decessor in this incomplete condition, even if he should find the document in which his predecessor had registered his act in this respect, or if the facts of the case should become known to him in any other manner. Sometimes it has been the Papal practice to cause some entirely confidential person of those about them to make out a list of those intended to be comprised in a coming creation of cardinals. And the secret history of the Vatican has many anecdotes connected with this practice. Bonifacio Vannozzi, of Pistoia, well known in the history of the Eoman Court as having served it as secretary for more than thirty years, had been employed by Gregory XIY. (o5. 1591) to draw up such a list of contemplated promotions. Ilaviug subsequently passed into the service of the Cardinal di Santa CeciUa, the Pope's nephew, tho latter, anxious to know the names of those who wore to be promoted, succeeded in wronchiag HIERARCHY IN STATE OF ELT7IDITY. 27 them from Ms secretary Vannozzi, whose own name was in the list. The Pope soon found out that his nephew knew all about the new creations, and, sending for Yannozzi, told him, that he had misinformed the Cardiaal di Santa Cecilia in one respect at least, and so saying handed him the list and bade him erase his own name! On another occasion it is related * that Pope Alexander YIII. {oh. 1691) sent for his secretary Gianfranceso Albani, who afterwards became Pope as Clement XI., that he might prepare an allocution to be spoken by the Pope on the following day but one, when a Consistory was to be held for the creation of twelve new cardinals. As the secretary proceeded with his work, the Pope, walking up and down the room the while, told him with many injunctions of profound secrecy the names of the cardinals to be made, one by one as the secretary came to that passage in the allocution which concerned them ; for in Papal allocutions upon these occasions it is the practice for the Pope to utter some words of eulogy and record of services rendered to the Church with reference to each of the new nominees. The Pope had thus gone through the first eleven on his list, and then stopping in his walk said, " Well ! why don't yon go on with your notice of the twelfth ? " " But who is the twelfth, your Holiness ? " returned Albani. "What! don't you know how to write your own name ? " said the Pope. " Thereupon," says the Jesuit biographer, who was, when he wrote, Bishop of Sisteron, "Albani pro- strated himself before the Pope and conjured him to * Lafiteau, Life of Clement XI., p. 27, 2 vols. 12mo, 1752. 28 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. nominate some more wortliy person " — a little bit of hypocritical comedy which the Jesuit deems necessary to the due exaltation of his subject. But the Pope, who was virtually making him not only a cardinal, but his own successor next but one — Innocent XII. (o5. 1700) having reigned nine years in the interim — ^told him that he had made many changes in the list of those whom he purposed to elevate to the purple, but that he had never once thought of omitting his name. CHAPTER III. Ceremonial connected with the Creation of Cardinals. — Practice in the Earliest Ages. — Consultation of the CoUege on the Subject. — Modem Practice. — Communication of his Creation to the new Cardinal. — His customary Duties thereupon. — Costume. — New Cardinal's Visit to the Vatican. — ^Patronage. — Ceremonial at the Apostolic Palace. — Speeches on the Occasion. — The " Beretta." — The new Cardinal's Eeception. — Shutting and Opening of the new Cardinal's Mouth. — Cardinalitial Eing. — Fees. — Ages at which Cardinals have been made. — Anecdotes of Odet de Coligny, the Heretic Cardinal. — ^Laws restricting Popes a Dead Letter. It would occupy too much, time and space to attempt to give a complete account of the ceremonies attendant on the creation of the members of the Sacred College. But as these ceremonies, both the strictly ecclesiastical por- tion of tbem and the social accompaniments of them, were for three or four hundred years, and up to the time of the recent revolution, which put an end to the tem- poral power of the Papacy, a prominent and leading feature in the routine of practices which, constituted the life of the Apostolic " Curia," and in the social life of Eome, it is necessary to say a few words upon the subject. For unless the ecclesiastical and social dignity and position of a cardinal, and the sort of place he fills, or rather filled, in the eyes of the Eoman world, be clearly understood, the meaning and significance of a Conclave wiU not be rightly apprehended. In the earlier ages of the Church the ceremonial 30 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. observed in the creation of a cardinal was not only much more simple than it became at a subsequent period, "which might have been expected, but it indicates also that there was in those days a very much greater reahty in the theory which represents the Sacred College as an assisting and, to a certain degree, controlling Council established for the guidance of the Holy Father. And this, too, indeed, might be expected to have been the case by those who have paid any attention to the progress of Church history. The creation of cardinals in the earKer centuries usually took place on the first "Wednesday of the "Quattro Tempera " or fast, with which each of the quarters of the year began; and the first act of the creation took place mostly at Santa Maria Maggiore. There after the Introit and Collect of the Mass had been said, a reader ascended the pulpit, and turning towards the people, said in a loud voice, " Cognoscat caritas vestra quia (N. N.) de titulo (N. '!^.) advocatur in ordine- diaconatus ad diaconiam (E. N.) et (N. N.) diaconus de titulo (IsT. K.) advocatur in ordine presbyteri ad titulum (N. N.). Si quis habit adversus hos viros aliquam querelam exeat confi- denttir propter Deum et secundum Deum, et dicat." * If any objection was stated, inquiry was made ; and if it was found to be well founded, a diflferent person was raised to the cardinalate. On the following Friday the * " Be it known to your charitable consideration that N. N., of the title of N. N. , is called in the order of deacons to the deaconry of N. N. , and N. N. , deacon of the titlo N. N., is called in the order of priests to the title N. N. If any man hath any complaint against yiose men, let him step forth with confidence, in behalf of God, and according to God's Word, and toll the same." HIEEARCHY IN STATE OP FLXJIDITT. 31 same thing was repeated in th.e clmrcli of the Twelve Apostles, The next day, the Saturday, at the mass at St. Peter's, after the Introit and the Collect, the Pontiff, turning to the people, pronounced these words : *' Auxiliante Domine Deo, et Salvatore nostro Jesu Christo eligimus in ordinem Diaconi (N. N.) de titulo (N. N.) ad diaconiam (N. N.) et (E. N.) Diaconum di titulo (N. N.) ia ordiae Presbyteratus ad titulum (H. 'N.). Si quis autem habet aliquid contra hos viros, pro Deo et propter Deum exeat et dicat. Verumtamen memor vit conditionis suse."* Then there was a pause for a short period, and if nobody came forward with any objection, the Pope proceeded to celebrate mass, and then declared the pro- motion of the persons named to the cardiualate, and gave them the scarlet hat then and there. At a somewhat later period the Pope asked of the Sacred College assembled in secret Consistory whether in their opinion there should be a creation of cardiaals, and of how many. Then on receiving an aflSrmative reply to the first question, he pronounced the words : ^' ISTos sequimur consilium dicentium quod fiant." j- Then according to the tenor of the replies to the second question, he said : " Nos sequimur consilium dicentium quod fiant," — such or such a number. He then requested the members of the College to give the choice of persons their best consideration, and so dismissed the meeting, A second Consistory was held on the follow- ing Friday, and the first thing done was the deputing * " Let Vii-m howeyer be mindful of his own condition." A hint not to speak lightly or presumingly. + " We foUow the advice of those who say that there should be a creation." 32 THE PAPAL CONCIiAVES. by the Pope of two cardinals to go to the residence of all those who were too infirm to attend the Consistory^ and collect their votes as to the persons to be promoted. When the deputation returned the Pope said : "Portetur nuda cathedra ! " * Thereupon all the cardinals rose and ranged themselves against the wall of the haU so as to be out of ear-shot of the Pope's seat. The chair was placed at the Pontiff's right hand, and the Dean of the Sacred College seated himself in it. The Pope then ia a low voice told him whom he thought of creating, and concluded with '' Quid vobis videtur ? " f One by one in order of seniority the whole College was thus consulted. When this was completed the Pope said aloud: "Deo gratias, habemus de personis creandis concordiam omnium fratrum," or "quasi omnium," or "majoris partis," J as the case might be. And then the Pontiff at once pro- claimed the new dignitaries with the following formula : "Auctoritate Dei onmipotentis, sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, et nostra creamus Sanctae Eomanse Ecclesise cardinales presbyteros quidem (N. N.), diaconos vero (N. N.), cum dispensationibus derogationibus et clausulis necessariis et opportunis." &e. On the follow- ing Saturday a public Consistory was held, at which the Pope addressed a hortatory allocution to the new cardiaals, placed the hat on their heads, and kept them to dine with him. Soon, howovev, wo find all semblance of consulting the Sacred College dropped ; and long before the intricate mass of rules for the ceremonial at present • "Let an empty chair be brought.'' ] " What do you think of it P " j "Thanks be to Ood, wo hare the consent of all our brethren," or " of nearly all of thorn," or " of the majority." HIERAECHT IST STATE OP PLUIDITT. 33 prevailing were invented, the Pope simply announced to the assembled cardinals, "Habemus fratres;"* and then proceeded to declare the names of those he chose to promote. It will be observed that from a very early time secrecy as to the names of those who were to be made cardinals, formed, as it still does amid so much else that has be- come changed, a very prominent feature in the method of proceeding. And we gather from this fact an indica- tion of the difilculty the Popes had to steer their way in this matter amid all the jealoxisies, enmities, intrigues, which this exercise of their patronage brought into play, and which in the earlier times were always tending to break out into open violence and even warfare. They had also to guard against the embarrassments arising from the requests of those whom it might often have been difl3.cult to refuse. In later times, when the Pope has determined on the creation of a batch of cardinals, he calls a secret Con- sistory—an assembly, that is to say, of the Sacred College. He then proceeds to read the allocution, the preparation of which was described in the last chapter, and at the conclusion of it says, " Quid vobis videtur ? " <■<■ How seems it to you ? " The words are as unreal a form as the "in pace " which consigned an erring nun to her living grave. For any expression of opinion on the subject by any member of the assembly would be as much out of the question in the one case as the hypocritical farewell is meaningless in the other. The assembled cardinals aU rise, take off their purple caps {henetta) * " We have as brothers." 34 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. and gravely bow their heads. Thereupon the Pope pro- ceeds to the creation in the following solemn form of words : " Auctoritate omnipotentis Dei, sanctorum Apos- tolorum Petri et Pauli ac nostra, creamus Sancta Eomanae Ecclesise, cardinales presbyteros quidem (N. N.), diaconos vero (N. E".), cum dispensationibus, derogationibus, et clausulis necessariis et opportunis." * If any cardinals are to be created in petto^ he here adds the form of words above given in the former chapter. He then thrice makes the sign of the cross with his right hand, saying as he does so, " In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen." And the Consistory is at an end. It is supposed that no one of the newly made Cardinals has any idea that such greatness is about to be thrust upon him. Of course it is almost always all perfectly well known beforehand. There have been cases, however, in •which the news of the promotion was wholly imexpected by the subject of it, but they are so few that Moroni gives a list of all the recorded cases. There are also many cases, occurring in times when communications were not so rapid as they arc now, of persons having been created cardinals who were dead at the time of their creation. With regard to those cardinals who are in Eome, and Avho are supposed to be entirely ignorant of the coming greatness, a master of ceremonies clothed in a purple mantle proceeds immediately after the termination of the Consistory to announce this promotion to each of * " By the authority of Omnipotent Gk)d, and by that of the Holy Apostles Petor and Paul, and by our own, we create cardinals of the holy Eoman Church, in tho rank of priests (!So and so), and in the rank of deacons (So and so), willi all tho necessary and fitting dispon- *!i(ions, limitations, and ivscrvations." HIERAECHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 35 them viva voce at their own residences, informing them at the same time at what hour that same afternoon they are to go to the Apostolic Palace to receive the purple cap. In fact, however, this is not the first notice the new cardinals have received of their promotion, for a servant of the Cardinal Secretary of State, carrying a note from his master, has outrun the Master of Ceremo- nies in his purple mantle and anticipated him. A third messenger, however, bringing the same glad tidings, comes to each of the new Eminences. For the Cardinal Vice-Chancellor, beiag by virtue of his office the only man who can authentically certify, the acts done in the Consis- tory, his substitute starts even before the Consistory is quite at an end, that is, as soon as ever the bell sounds which announces the utterance of the creating words, and is thus the first of all to carry the tidings. All this is settled prescriptively and perfectly known to all Eome — to all Eome as it was, for the greater part of the Eome of the present day knows no more of such matters than Londoners do. And it was not without reason that it should have been so, for all these various annunciations were the occasion of receiving large fees — a valuable part of the emoluments of the different offices, which, in some cases, had been bought on careful calculation of such profits. As soon as ever the first announcement has been received, the new cardinal places himself clothed in purple cassock and band on the threshold of his residence, there to receive standing the so-called visite di colore, — the first heat visits, as we may say, of the prelates, nobles, military officers, and cardinals' gentlemen, who D 2 36 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. come to offer their congratulations. Other and more formal visiting will follow in due time; but these m/fe di calore are supposed to represent the enthusiastic rush of friends breathless with delight at the unexpected news. On this occasion the new cardinal is to have a black skull-cap on Ms head, which he is not to take off to anybody, and he is to hold a somewhat larger black cap in his hand the whUe. The article which I have called a skull-cap is the lerettina. The lerretta, which the cardinal holds in his hand, is the square- cornered cap which the clergy use in church. The lerretta of a cardinal is of sUk for the summer and of cloth for the winter, save in the case of members of the monastic orders, who wear merino in the summer. And if the new dignitary be a canon regular, or a member of any of the monastic orders, his cassock, instead of being purple, must be of the colour of the dress of his order. To those of the newly-created cardinals who are not in Eome, the purple lerretta is sent by the hands of a papal ablegate, but the purple - lerettina by those of one of the Pope's Koblc Guard. In some cases where it has been intended to show special favom* and distinction, the Hat itself has been sent to cardinals created at a distance fi'om Eome. But this has been A'cry rarely done. Paul II. {ol. 1471) was the fii-st Pope who granted to the cardinals the use of the purple, or rather scarlet, cap. Bonanni, in the lOCtli chapter (!) of his learned work on the cardinal's lerretta saj's this colom* reminds the cardinal not only of his superior dignity, but of the martyrdom for which he must be ever prepared for the HIEEAECHY IN STATE OP FLUIDITY. 37 ■defence of th.e Clnxrch. ! A somewhat better known author, Petrarch, in a letter to the Bishop of Sabina,'^^ speaks of certain cardinals who, "being not only mortal, but well-nigh moribund, are rendered oblivious of their mortality by a little bit of red cloth ! " For a long time the members of the monastic orders were spared this danger, and used caps of the same colour as their cassocks, which they still wear of the colour proper to their order. Gregory XIV. (ob. 1591), however, being moved thereto by the entreaties of Cardinal Bonelli, a Dominican, nephew of Pius V., thought seriously of granting the red cap to the cardinals of the monastic orders, and ordered the " Con- gregation of Eites" to examine the question. Five cardinals constituted the congregation, of whom the three oldest reported in favour of the measure. As they were not unanimous, however, on the question, Gregory thought it desirable to take the opinion of the entire College of Cardinals on the point; and a majority of three-quarters of the College being in. favour of the inno- vation, the monastic cardinals got their red caps, and have worn them ever since. Accordiagly, Gregory summoned the four monastic cardinals, who at that time belonged to the Sacred College, to the Quirinal, on the 19th of June, 1591, and there, having caused four red caps to be brought on a silver salver, placed them on the heads of the four cardiaals kneeling before him without more ado (sensa ultra eeremoma) ; and thus, with their red caps on their heads, they appeared at the mass ■celebrated that morning at the Chiu'ch of the Apostles, * Lib. XT. Epist. 4. 38 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. with the applause, says the special historian* of this im- portant concession, of the whole court, no less than if there had been a creation of new cardinals. The importance of this event at Eome maybe measured by the fact that the volume above cited by no means contains the whole liter- ature of the subject. Father Tommaso Gonziani pub- lished a letter on the same topic addressed to the Car- dinal Alessandrtno. There appeared also in 1592, and again in a second edition in 1606, a book "De Bireto rubro, dando S.E.E. Cardinalibus regularibus, responsa prudentum divini, humanique juris, ab Antonia Scappo, in Eomana Curia advocate coUecta, uno etiam addito ejus- response." "We have also, "Eesponsum di-voni humanique juris consultorum de Bireto coccineo Illustriss, S.E.E, Card, regularibus aPontifi.ee conferendo. Eome, 1606." Indeed, it was time that this matter should be satis- factorily settled. For already a Franciscan friar. Cardinal of Aracoeli, had been so discontented with the black cap, given him by Paul IV. {oh. 1559), that, after wearing it a year, he had sadly scandalized all Eome by audaciously assuming a red one on no authority but his own, '' it being found impossible to make him understand that he ought not to wear red as well as the others " ! " For how otherwise," said this Franciscan friar, "should he be saved from coming into contact with the populace ? '' To return to the ceremonial of the day on which the new cardinals have been proclaimed. Half an hour before the time named for their arrival at the Papal palace to receive the bcrrcf/n, each cai-dinal sends a carriage — not his state carriage but a more ordinai'y * I'atcnn, " Itisiuisii JclLi bonoltii rossa di Jarsi ai Cardinali rcligiosi." HIERARCHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 39 one — ^with two chaplains and two chamberlains in it to the palace. One of the chamberlains carries wrapped in a purple cloth garnished with a golden fringe the rochet, the band, and the violet-coloured cape, and ordinary epis- copal hat of his master. He consigns all these things to the master of ceremonies of the Sacred Palace, who places them in a chamber of the apartment of the cardinal nephew. All these dependents of the new cardinals then wait in the first ante-chamber, and the eldest among them places himself near the door in readi- ness to open the door of his master's carriage on his arrival. Why rehearse all this trash? Because at Eome, as Eome was, all these matters were deemed worthy of being minutely and irrevocably settled and appointed; and they are described authoritatively in the learned volumes of those whose mastery of the intricate and complex science of the etiquette of the Pontifical Couit made them highly necessary specialists in their own branch of learning. A whole crowd of such facts are needed to give a nineteenth- century Englishman some notion of the social state and pecu- liarities of the old Papal Eome. And aU these minute little services and duties were privileges carrying with them advantages in one kind or another. And the distribution of these privileges and the possibility of sharing in these advantages were matters that came home in one shape or another to half the homes in Eome, in every social class, and formed topics of conversation and interest in that strange little world so curiously shut out from all the subjects that were interesting the other big world outside ! The Princess's tirewoman, 40 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. wtile dressing her mistress's hair, would seek to induce her to move her brother the Cardinal to appoint as his senior chamberlain some relative, or more probably some client who had feed the waiting-woman for her advocacy. Some family poor to the extent of all but wanting bread, but respectable by virtue of some family connection with somebody who held some post or office in the retinue or household of some prelate, would specu- late on the contingent advantages that might arise to them through certain promotion that might fall to the lot of uncle Beppo, or cousin Giuseppe, Monsignore's intendente di casa, in case Monsignore should be raised to the purple. One gossip calls upon another in quest of a favour. " Car a mia, I should so like to get a look at the new cardinals as they come for their lerrette I Xow you know your husband's brother is decano in the family of his Eminence of San Pietro in Yincula that is to be. He will of course be at the carriage door at the QuiriQal. If you could get him to let me have a little place in a corner — eh ? " These things are patronage, and are valued, and make safe topics of interest and talk for a people ! "Well ! At the appointed hour the new dignitaries arrive at the palace in their state carriages, accompanied each by his master of the chambers and cupbearer, " or gentleman." The carriage must have its blinds down, and be preceded by one single servant "\^ithout umbrella " (the imibrclla which always precodos a prelate on state occasions), and all the other servants of the household (men of course) follow the carriage, except the "sub-doan" [i.e. the servant second in HIERARCHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 41 seniority), who walks at the right hand of the carriage door. The " dean," we remember, is waiting to open the door of the carriage for his master on his arrival. The new cardinal is received at the palace doors by a master of the ceremonies and the chief of the out- runners, and proceeds to the ante-chamber, where the cardinal nephew meets him and conducts him to his own apartment, where the master of ceremonies takes the prelate's band off him, and girds him with one adorned with tassels of gold. He also puts on him, unless he be a member of a monastic order, a rochet * and mantle. And thus accoutred he is presented by the cardinal nephew to the Pope, whom he finds seated on his throne clothed in rochet and cape,t and sur- rounded by all the dignitaries of his court. The new dignitary approaching kneels three times at intervals, and on arriving at the foot of the throne, led by the master of the ceremonies, he prostrates himself to kis the papal slipper. The master of the ceremonies then brings the scarlet mossetta which the Pope places on the shoulders of the new cardinal with his own hands. He then similarly places the " berxetta " of like colour on his head. But the master of the ceremonies who brought the mossetta must not touch the herretta. The latter is brought by a prelate, "Monsignore Guardaroba," or at least by his deputy. As soon as * The " rochet " is the linen garment reaching about half-way down the body, with sleeves covering the entire arm to the wrist, generally richly laced, which in the Eoman Catholic Church answers to our surplice. t Mozzetta. The mozzetta is that cape of fur or of silk peculiar to the Pope, cardinals, bishops, abbots, and canons, which the latter are ordinarily seen wearing in the choir during service. 42 THE PAPAL CONCLAYES. this has been done, the new cardinal again kisses the foot and also the knee of the Pontiff, who then gives him the kiss of peace on both cheeks — lo ammette al duplice amplesso. Then the Pope makes a speech, in which he speaks of the shining merits of the new dignitary, of the motives which have moved him (the Pope) to make the creation, and reminds the new cardinal of the duties and responsibilities, which that dignity brings with it. The cardinal — or the senior of the group in the name of all, if, as is ordinarily the case, there are several — makes a speech in reply, full of promises and thanks, and concluding, says Moroni, * as if he were giving a receipt for the performance of this task, with a declaration that it is only to the Pontiff's indulgence that the promotion is due. Indeed, Parisi, the writer of a work entitled, " Instructions," respecting all these points of ceremonial, gives a collec- tion of forms for these thanksgiving speeches ! As soon as the speech is finished the first master of the ceremonies pronounces "Extra omnes," and the Pope and the new cardinals and the Cardinal Secretary of State are left for awhile alone together. "WTien they are dismissed they return to the outer room, where they find the "Monsignore Sotto Guardaroba" waiting for them, ready to present to each on a silver salver the berettina^ or scarlet skull-cap, to be worn under the berretta, which they ha^o already received in the Pope's presence ; after which they return to the apart- ment of the Secretary of State, and after a little conver- sation depart in their carriages as they came. Arrived * Vol. y. p. IGO. HIEEARCHY IN STATE OE FLUIDITY. 43 at his own residence, tlie new cardinal lays aside his rochet and mantle, and clad in cardinal's cassock and cape, and " with his red herretta ia his hand," proceeds to receive the congratulatory visits of the Eoman world. The laws and regulations prescribed respecting the honorific custody, and, one may say, attendance, on this taKsmanic scarlet cap (not to to be confounded, it should be observed, with the still more majestic and awful Hat), are curiously illustrative of the ways and tone of the old Eoman society. Even after the day of which we are speaking, the herretta is to be placed on a little table all to itself in the cardinal's throne apartment. His Eminence uses it whenever he is in a cardinal's canonicals. And on these occasions, when he takes it from his head, he gives it to his " gentleman of the chamber" to hold. When, however, his Eminence attends collegiate service in the Papal or Cardinal's Chapel, at the entrance to the sacristy, the gentleman of the chamber consigns the cap to the cardinal's train- bearer, who never quits his master, and hands it to him every time he covers himself during the service, which is very frequently, and when he receives incense. But on those occasions when the cardinals wear the mitre, the gentleman of the chamber always carries the herretta, and in processions holds it in his hand walking by the side of his master, " as an ensign," says Moroni,* of the cardinalitial dignity. Caraccioli, Bishop of Lecce, in the fifteenth century, strongly recommends the kissing of the herretta every morning and every evening. * Loc. a'l. 44 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. When any one of royal blood, or a brother or a nepbew of the Pope, is created cardinal, the guns of St. Angelo fire a salute ; and at the Consistory in which the publication is made the oldest member of the Sacred College rises immediately on the declaration of the name by the Pope, and prays the Pontiff to give him the scarlet lerretta instantly on the spot, which, in ac- cordance with duly registered precedent, his Holiness does. The receptions held by newly-created cardinals on the evening of the day of their creations, as mentioned above, were always one of the great features in the old Eoman society, and the evening in question was looked forward to as a time of high festival by all the city. There was a general illumination of the city, with fire- works and burning of tar-barrels, specially in front of the palaces of the cardinals and the representatives of foreign sovereigns. The fronts of the residences of the new cardinals were ornamented with illuminations in elabo- rate designs, and vast sums were spent on these decora- tions by the richer dignitaiies, specially by such as were desirous of ingratiating themselves with the Eoman people. It was a great matter for fine-di'awn political speculations to watch carefully who went and who omitted to go, or who went eai'ly and eagerly and who late and perfunctorily, to the new cardinal's reception on the night of his creation. As a rule, " all Eomo " was tlierc, and his Eminence's rooms were all a-glittcr with the crosses and stars of diploniatists, the gorgeous robes of ecclesiastical princes, and the diamonds of the Roman ladies, to whom these receptions were HIEEAECHT IN STATE OF PLXIIDITY. 45 occasions for displaying tlieir utmost magnificence. The appearance of (say) the Imperial ambassador's wife with less than the full array of diamonds she was known to possess, still more, of course, her non- appearance, would at once have made a ground for speculating on the probability that the newly-made cardinal would be struck by the Imperial " Veto "* at the next papal election. The doors of the new Eminence were understood to be open on this occasion ; and any stranger in Eome, or indeed anybody to whom the tailor or milliner had given a satisfactory ticket of admission, might enter. There is one other curious ceremony which must be noticed before this, it may be feared tedious, chapter of the mode of cardinal-makiag can be concluded — ^the closing and opening of the mouths of the new cardinals. In the first secret Consistory after the creation, before laying before the members of the Sacred College the business in hand, the Pope addresses these words to the lately promoted dignitaries : " Claudimus vobis os, ut neque in consistoriis, neque in congregationibus, aliisque functionibus cardinalitiis sententiam vestram dicere valeatis." f And at the end of the same Consistory he says : '* Aperianus vobis os, J ut in consistoriis, &c., &c., sententiam vestram dicere valeatis. In nomine Patris, et Pilii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen." And so saying, he makes the sign of the cross thrice with his right hand. * An account of the origin, nature, and practice of this usage will be found in a subsequent chapter. f " We close your mouths, so that you have no power to speak your opinion in consistories or congregations, or any cardinalitial functions." + " We open your mouths," &c. &c. 46 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. It used to be the custom for the new cardinal, whose mouth had been shut, to leave the hall of the Consistory- while the Pope consulted the Sacred College as to the opening of the mouth of their new colleague. There- upon the novice came in and had his mouth opened. But this form has been disused of late times : an indica- tion, even in such little matters of mere formality, of the general tendency to erect the pontifical power into a pure and absolute despotism, -uncontrolled even by the semblance of any consultative authority in the College. At a still more remote period, the mouths of new cardinals were shut in one Consistory, and were not opened tiU the following meeting of the College. Pope Eugenius IV. {oh. 1447) decreed that^if any cardinal had not had his mouth opened at the time of the Pope's death, he could not take part in the following Conclave. But there are signs that there was previously some idea that such ought to be the case. For it is on record that the English Cardinal Winterburn was in this plight at the death of Benedict XI., in 1304, and that his mouth was opened by the Dean of the Sacred College, authorised to do so by a vote of the entire College. Pius V., however, by a decretal dated 26th January, 1571, repealed the decision of Eugenius. After the opening of the mouth, the Pope places on the new cardinal's finger the cai'dinalitial ring of gold, with a sapphire, and at the same time assigns to each the church from which ho is to take his title. In eai-ly times the ring of a deceased cardinal was given to the newly-created one. Nevertheless, there exist contem- poraneous notices of cardinals disposing of the ring HIERARCHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 47 in question by will; so tliat it should seem that also in this respect the institution was, in the fourteenth century, in a state of fluidity. In modern times it has been the custom for each new cardinal to pay for his ring five hundred crowns to the CoUege de Propaganda Fide^ which till the money was paid did not despatch the brief (which it is the function of the College to do), on which depends the commencement of drawing the cardinal's allowance. A few words may be added as to the age at which persons can be, or have been, made cardinals ; and it will be seen that, in this respect also, the institution remained in a state of fluidity up to a comparatively recent period. It seems to have been generally under- stood that the rule was that thirty years of age should be requisite to the cardinalate. Yet Sixtus Y., in the Bull which professed to regulate the requirements for eligibility to that dignity, decrees that no cardinal deacon shall be created under twenty-two years of age. He also declares that if one so created be not already in deacon's orders, he must receive them within the year, or remain without any voice in the College. Many Popes have, by dispensation, permitted the interval allowed before the necessity of taking deacon's orders to be greatly extended. But if the Pontiff happened to die during the time thus allowed, the cardinal who was not in orders could not, save by forthwith receiving them, enter the Conclave or vote for the new Pope. In this matter of the age, however, at which a cardinal could be created, as in so many others, it has been found impossible to bind one infallible Yicar of 48 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. Clirist by the decree of another. Despite all rules and precedents to the contrary, each Pope created such persons cardinals as it was convenient to him to create. Giocinto Bobo Orsini was created cardinal at twenty by Honorius II. in 1126, and became Pope as Celes- tine III. sixty-five years afterwards ! Clement YI., in 1348, created his nephew, Peter Eoger, cardinal at seventeen ; and this young cardinal also became Pope in 1370 under the name of Gregory XI. Eugenius IV., in 1440, made his nephew, Peter Barbo, cardinal, who also subsequently became Pope as Patd II. Sixtus lY.y in 1477, created John of Arragon, the son of Ferdinand, King of Naples, cardinal at the age of fourteen, but gave him the hat only four years later. The same Pontiff, at the same time, created his nephew, EaffaeUe Eiario, cardinal when he was seventeen and a student at Pisa. Innocent YIII. (ob. 1492) created Giovanni Medicis, who afterwards became Leo X., and who had been Apostolic Protonotary ever since he was seven years old, cardinal at the age of fourteen, adding the con- dition that he was not to wear the purple tiU three years later, evidently indicating his (Pope Innoccut's) opinion that a cardinal of seventeen might be created without scandal, as indeed such a step was, as we have seen, not without precedent. Alexander TI. (ob. 1503) created Ippolito d'Este a cardinal at seventeen, having the excuse indeed that Ippolito had at that time been an archbishop for ]tho last nine years, Sixtus IV. having appointed him to the arcliiopiscopal sec of Strigonia at the age of eight ! At the same time Alexander created HIEEAECHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 49 Frederic Casimir Jagellon, tlie son of the King of Poland, when he was nineteen, and had abeady for some little time been Bishop of Cracow. Leo X. {oh. 1521) was hardly grateful to the Pope who had made him a cardinal at fourteen, for, when Pope, he made Innocenzo Cibo, the nephew of his old patron, wait till his twenty-first year for the purple. But he created "William de Croy a cardinal at nineteen, and Alfred of Portugal, the son of the King, at seyen years old, on condition that he should not assume the outward marks of the dignity till he should have reached the mature age of fourteen ! He also made John of Lorraine, son of Duke Bene II. of SicUy, cardinal at twenty, Alexander YL having previously made him coadjutor to the bishopric of Metz at four years of age ! Hercules Gonzaga, who had been made bishop of his native Mantua at fifteen by Leo X., was made cardinal by Clement VII. at twenty-two. The poof Bishop must have almost despaired by that time of ever reaching the purple ! Clement made his own cousin IppoHto at eighteen, and Odet de Coligny, at the request of Francis I. of Prance, when he was in his twelfth year. This promotion, however, turned out ill. For Coligny, though he became Bishop of Beauvais in his thirteenth, and Archbishop of Toulouse in his four- teenth year, and held many abbeys into the bargain,, fell eventually into heresy, and had to be formally deposed from the purple. His heresy, indeed, was of the most flagrant sort. At Beauvais, one Easter, he received the Holy Communion in both kinds, which^ 50 THE PAPAL CONCLATES. though he was a bishop and an archbishop, not being in Ml priest's orders, it was sacrilege to do. Then he " took to the profession of arms, giving thereby terrible scandal to all Catholics." Yet those who remembered the history of their Church, and the example of Julius II., and many another Pope and cardinal and bishop, need not have been so scandalized at this. But he fought on the wrong side! And stiU. worse married, or, as the ecclesiastical writers are careful to point out, pretended to marry, a wife, Isabelle di Lore, Lady of Hauteville, "whom, deacon as he was, he lived with as a concubine." Thereupon Pius IV. {oh. 1565), on the 11th of September, 1563, proclaimed his deposition from the cardinalate throughout all France. He was exiled thence, escaped to England, where Elizabeth gave him and his wife Sion House to live in. He died and was buried at Canterbury, in 1568, poisoned, as was said, by his servants. How fearful and wonderful a thing, that one whom the Church had so marked for her own that she made him a cardinal at eleven, a bishop at twelve, and an archbishop at thirteen, should have been so little seriously impressed by the sacred nature of his respon- sibilities and respect for his Church ! Truly mai'velloTis and incomprehensible are the ways of Providence ! There seems to be reason, however, to doubt whether, despite all that has been stated, Coligiiy, if he had presented himself at a conclave for the election of a Pope, could have been cauonicully excluded and deprived of his vote. But this is a subject to which -\ve shall have to return in a later chapter. HIERAECHT IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 51 Paul III,, Farnese {oh. 1549), made Ms nephe-w, Alexander Farnese, a cardinal at fourteen ; his grand- son, Guido Ascanio Sforza, son of his daughter Costanza, at sixteen; his cousin, Mccolo Gaetani, at twelve; and a second grandson, Eanucio Farnese, at fifteen, to whom he had a year before given the arch- bishopric of Naples! He also created Charles of Lorraine, son of the Due de Guise, and brother of Mary Queen of Scots, cardinal at twenty -two, although he had at the time a brother in the Sacred College, which was contrary to the constitutions and the decree of one of his predecessors. Lastly, he made his relative, GiuUo Feltre della Eovere, brother of the Duke of Urbino, a cardinal at eleven ! Julius III. {oh. 1555) created Innocenzo del Monte cardinal at seventeen, and his two nephews, Eoberto dei Nobili at fourteen, and Girolamo Simoncelli at twenty-one. The latter is noted as having been a cardinal during sixty years ! The zealous and earnest Pius lY. (oi. 1565), besides creating several cardinals at from twenty to twenty-three, made Ferdinand de Medici a cardinal at fourteen. Gregory XIII. {ol. 1585) made Andrew of Austria, a natural son of the Archduke Ferdinand, a cardinal at eighteen ; and Albert of Austria, son of Maximilian II., at the same age. He also created Charles of Lorraine at sixteen, and Francesco Sforza at twenty. The high-handed reformer, Sixtus Y. {oh. 1590), made his nephew, Alexander Peretti, cardinal at fourteen; and Innocent IX. {oh. 1591), found time in his two months' papacy to create his nephew, Antonio Fachinetti della Noce, E 2 62 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. at eighteen. Innocent was aware, probably, tbat he had no time to lose ! Clement VIII. (ob. 1605) made Wilhelm, son of the Duke of Bavaria, a cardinal at twenty : but he had been Bishop of Eatisbon ever since he had been in the cradle ! Clement also created his relative, Gio. Battista Deti, cardinal at seventeen, and his nephew, Silvestro Aldobrandini, at sixteen, although he had previously raised to the purple his brother, Pietro Aldobrandini, at the age of twenty-two, despite the papal decree forbidding two brothers to belong to the Sacred CoUege at the same time. Paul Y. (ob. 1621) created Maurice of Savoy at four- teen; Carlo de Medici at nineteen; and Ferdinand of Austria, son of Philip III. of Spaia, at ten ! Urban VIII., Barberini (ob. 1644), although he had akeady placed iu the Sacred College Francesco and Antonio Barberini, his brother and his nephew, created his other nephew, Antonio, at the age of twenty. Innocent X., Pamphili (ob. 1655), made the nephew of his sister-in-law, the celebrated Olympia, cardinal at seventeen; and Clement IX. (ob. 1669) made Sigis- mund Chigi, the nephew of Alexander VII., a cardinal at nineteen, in return, we are told, for the purple which he had himself received from Alexander VII. Alexander VIII. (ob. 1691) created Lorenzo Altieri, the nephew of Clement X., cardinal at nineteen; Clement XII. (ob. 1740) made Luigi di Borboni, son of Philip V. of Spain, archbishop of Toledo and cardinal at the age of eight; and, finally, Pius VII. (ob. 1823) created Luigi di Borboni, the sou of the HIEEARCHT IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 53 above-mentioned Archbisliop of Toledo, cardinal at twenty-tkree. I liave somewbat grudged th.e space that has been needed to complete the list of these precocious dignitaries, but I have thought that it was worth giving for the sake of the Ulustration it affords of the genuineness, sincerity, and state of mind generally of those, ecclesiastical writers and others, who on the same page which records these monstrous promotions, tell us of the infallibility and, in many cases, of the saintly virtues of the Pontiffs who made them, and of the awful sanctity and tremendous responsibilities of those who are called to the assumption of a dress whose colour is the symbol of their being ever ready to shed their blood in defence of the Church ! It is also curiously illustrative of the utter futility of attempting by any rules, canons, or constitutions whatever to bind the hands of one who may at his .pleasure " dispense " with all laws and rules. CHAPTEE IV. steps by wliicli the Papal Election was attributed exclusively to the- Sacred College. — Gradual Progress of Encroacbment. — Abnormal Elections. — Early Eequisites for the Validity of an Election. — Earliest Examples of the Conclave. — Notable Conclave at Viterbo in the thirteenth century. — Pirst example of Election by " Compro- mise." — The Fifteen Rules for a papal Election made by Gregory X. — Basis of Conclave Legislation ever since. Me. Caetweight, in his able and interesting little volume, " On the Constitution of Papal Conclayes," says, quite correctly in my opinion, that, " from the Bull of Nicholas II.," which I have spoken of at the beginning of my second chapter, " dates the first organic consum- mation of a revolution that had long been working its way imderground, by which the highest constitutional functions of the Eoman See came to be taken away definitively from the ecclesiastical body at large." He adds, however, " and vested exclusively in this corpora- tion" (the Sacred College), which cannot, I think, be said with accuracy. Indeed he goes on to state with entire correctness, what shows this not to have been the case. Quoting the same Bull, which I have referred to, he adds, " so that the cardinals have the lead in making choice of Popes, the other but following them." But it may be seen from the words of promulgation used in declaring the election of Ilildobrand in 1073, already cited above in the first chapter, " wc the cardinals, and HIERARCHY IN STATE OP FLTJIDITY. 55 the clergy, acolytes, subdeacons, and priests elect," &c., &c., that fixity of election, by the Sacred College, bad by no means been yet reached. The language of the Bulls and decrees on the subject, and that of the very many writers who have striven to throw light on the question, all go to show that no clear and certain rules or practice in the elections of the Popes had yet been attained. The impression left on the mind by reading these declarations, and the commentaries on them, is that it was the wish and purpose of the Popes and of the cardinals to vest the election exclusively in the latter body ; but that they were not able, or could not venture to aflB.rm distinctly that such was the case, or to decree that it should be the case. The utterances both of Bulls and decrees and of the subsequent eccle- siastical writers seem to be studiously wavering and uncertain ; such, in short, as it might be expected to be in registeriag and describing the advance of an abusive encroachment. The Bull of Nicholas II. declares the assent of the clergy to be necessary to an election. To demand an assent implies the power of refusing that assent. An election made without that assent would according to the terms of the Bull of Nicholas have been void. Moroni, quoting the commentaries of Panvinius on Platina, tells us that Celestine II. {oh. 1144) was the first Pope elected without the intervention of the Eoman people. And Sigonius,* quoted by Moroni, says of Celestine's predecessor. Innocent II. {oh. 1143), " Popu- lum Pontificiorum jure comitiorum, cujus a primis tem- * De regno Italico, lib. x. an. 1143. 56 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. poribiis ad earn usque diem particeps fuerat, spolia- Yerat."* Pagi says that Innocent II., already before the election of Celestine, had been elected hy the cardinals alone, without the " assistance " of the clergy and people. Otto of Freisingen declares in his chro- nicle, that Eugenius III. {ol. 1153) was elected in 1445, " communi veto cleri et popuU." And he says that in 1154 the '' clerici et laici pariter conclamantes intronizarunt Hadrianum quartum," the English Pope. The fact is not only that apparently contradictory state- ments by the dozen may be found, but that the language of all these statements is so vague, uncertain, and plastic, that it is impossible to say what the precise meamng was which the writer intended to convey ; or useless rather, as it might perhaps be better put, to attempt to extract from their words a precision of statement, which the subject they were treating of did not admit, and the necessity or desirability of which they had no concep- tion of. This at least is clear, that during all that period of fluidity, as I have ventured to call it, the line of demarcation between de jure and de facto was oscil- lating, changeable, and vacillating ; but that the general tendency was always advancing towards the recognition of an exclusive right to elect the Popes, in the CoUege of Cardinals. So far, however, was the matter from being defini- tively settled by the Bull of Nicholas II., or by the practice that had prevailed dm-ing the next hundred and twenty years, that the fli-st attempt made to eftect an election, that of Alexander III. {oh. 1181), without * Breviar., torn. i. p. G69. HIERARCHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 57 the participation of the clergy and people, led to a scHsm among the cardinals, and the election of an Antipope, who called himself Yictor IV. Four Anti- popes in succession sprung from and supported the schism, and contested the election and the sovereignty of Alexander III. He lived, however, to overcome his enemies, and heal the wounds of the Church in the course of a papacy of all but twenty-two years. And before his death, he assembled the third Lateran Council, which among other matters decreed that no future election to the Papal Throne should be deemed valid without the votes of two-thirds of the College of Cardinals, a regulation which has been observed ever since, and is the law which regulates the proceedings of the Conclaves to the present day. Nevertheless we have not yet by any means reached the latest case of an altogether abnormal election, though we have made considerable progress towards ascertaining what the norma was to be. As late as 1417, Martin Y. (oi. 1431) was elected for the closing of the schism, which had so deeply wounded the Church, not only by the members of the Sacred College, created by Gregory XII. (renounced, 1415), and those of the deposed John XXIII. (deposed, 1415), and those created (or rather professed to be created) by the Antipope Benedict XIII. ; but also by thirty other prelates, sis for each of the five nations which contributed to the Council. As far, however, as regards the final attribution of the power of electing the Pontiff to the College of Cardinals exclusively, we may consider that the practice of the Church was fixed, as it has ever since remained, by the 58 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. constitutions of Alexander III. {oh. 1181). It remains to be shown tliat tlie practice thus ordained did not succeed in getting itself carried out witli satisfactory- regularity tUl a yet later epoch. Nothing had yet been established, as a matter of rule, as to the mode in which the cardinals were to elect, save that, as has been seen, it needed two-thirds of the votes to make a valid elec- tion. We find early instances of the shutting up of the cardinals, for the purpose of the election ; but in most of these cases the imprisonment seems to have been involuntary, and imposed on them by force ah extra. Thus Honorius III. {oh. 1227) was elected on the 18th of July, at Perugia, by nineteen cardinals, whom the Perugians constrained to enter into Conclave, on the day after the death of Innocent III., who died in that city, keeping them imprisoned till the election should be completed. Such a case very clearly indicated that by that time the idea, that the body of cardinals and they alone could create a Pope, had entirely entered into the popular mind, and been recognised and accepted. The people of Perugia, in their anxiety to avoid the terrible evils of an interregnum, are determined to have a Pope elected with the least possible delay. But they con- sider that the only possible means of accomplishing this is to catch the cardinals and compel them to do their work. His successor Gregory IX. {ol. 1241) was elected under somewhat similar circumstances, the Eomans apparently thinking that the experiment made at Perugia had answered so well as to deserve imitation. The chronicler Eainaldi relates, on the authority of HIEEAECHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 59 Eiceardo di San Germano, that the cardinals, who had assembled in Eome for the election of a Pope, were shut •up at the Septisolium (the hill on which the Church of St. Gregory stands, near the CoKseum) by the Senator of Eome and the people, that they might against their will proceed to the creation of a Pope,* which expedient, says CanceUieri,-!- was perhaps adopted to avoid the invasions of the Emperor Frederick, who, encamped at Grotta Ferrata, was devasting all the neighbourhood of Eome. Gregory IX. died in 1241. Celestine IV., who suc- ceeded him, reigned seventeen days only. Innocent IV., who came next, reigned eleven years and nearly a half. The papacy of his successor Alexander IV. lasted six years and nearly a half. The next in the list, Urban IV., reigned three years and a month. Clement IV. succeeded him, and, after a reign of three years and nine months, died in 1269. These twenty- eight years, from the death of Gregory to that of Clement, had been disastrous and stormy ones for Italy, mainly by reason of the contests between different pre- tenders to the crown of Sicily, and by the pretension of the Popes to have the nomination of the sovereign in their hands. Clement IV. introduced a new and fatal element into the troubled skein of Italian politics by * Cardinales qui in Urbe ad Papse electionem convenerant, per Sena- torem et Eomanos apud Septisolium iaoluduntur, ut at creandum Papam inviti procedant. f Notizie Istoriche delle Stagioni e de' Siti diversi in cui Bono stati tenuti i Conclavi neUa Citta di Eoma, &o. Eaccolta da Francesco Cancellieri. Eoma, 1823. A very rare tract, as are many of the great number of gossiping and amusing tracts on very various subjects, ■written by tbe same author. 60 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. conferring this crown on Charles of Anjou, thus bringing a French dynasty into Italy, and, what is more to our immediate purpose, causing thus a profound and irrecon- cilable division ia the College of Cardinals, some of whom attached themselves to the French interest, and some feeliag the most bitter resentment against the French prince, and against the policy which had called him into Italy. At the death of Clement IV. in Viterbo, just a month after the last of the Hohenstauffens, the hapless Conradin, had lost his head on a scaffold at Naples — (he had never once during his pontificate of three years and nine months been at Eome) — the discrepancy of opinion between the cardinals led to a most bitterly and obstinately contested struggle for the election of the next Pope, which resulted in an interregnum, the longest on record in the annals of the Church, of two years and nine months. Seventeen* cardinals went into Conclave in Viterbo, which small town, as Mr. Cartwright truly says, " became the point on which remained the fixed and anxious gaze of Christendom." Seven of the cardinals in Conclave were in the French interest, and seven as entirely opposed to it. Moroni remarks that perhaps the length of the interregnum was due to the division of parties! — the "perhaps" being introduced in deference to the theory and claim that let what may be the motives and intentions of the electors, the result is due to the * Mr. CartwrigM says that they wero eighteen ; but I cannot find that more than seventeen are recorded as being present. Moroni says fifteen, or seventeen. Perhaps the circumstance of the Cardin.al Henry of Ostia having quitted (he Oouclavo on .account of illness, may account for the discrepancy, ono rockoniug having been of those who went into Conclave, and the other of those -who participated finally in the election. HIERAECHT IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 61 direct action of the Holy Spirit. He adds that the delay could not be due to the want of any person among their own body fitted for becoming Pope, inasmuch as no less than four of those then present became subsequently Popes, under the names of Adrian V. {ol. 1276), Nicholas III. {ol. 1280), Martin IV. {oh. 1285), and Honorius IV. {oi. 1287). Unquestionable, however, as the "papa- bility," — ^to use a word which has become a cant one in Conclave language — of aU these four may have been, the cardinals at Viterbo could not come to an election, for the opposing parties were so evenly balanced, and the interests at stake so great, that neither side would yield. Charles of Anjou came to Viterbo, and remained there, hoping that by throwing the weight of his personal presence into the scale, he might intimidate the cardinals on the opposite side. He had not calculated on the patient obstinacy of an Italian who trusts for victory to the policy of doing nothing ! The desired election was none the nearer for the presence of the foreign prince, who was so odious to all save his own creatures in the College. The citizens of Viterbo, and the town captain, oneEanieri Gatti, who as such had the custody of the Conclave, which seems to have implied the imprisonment of the car- dinals, in his hand, understood their countrymen better. Despairing of seeing an end put to the shocking condition of disorder and anarchy, which always, down even to quite modern times, made the Pontifical States a hell upon earth during the period of every interregnum, they re- sorted to the novel expedient of unroofing the palace in which the Conclave was sitting, at the same time gradually G2 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. diminishing the rations supplied to the cardinals. But not even did this strong measure succeed in producing the desired result. There is a curious letter extant, ad- dressed by the cardinals to Qatti, the town-captain, the purpose of which was to request him to allow one of their number, the Cardinal Henry of Ostia, to quit the Conclave on the ground of illness. This letter is dated in Palatio discoperto Episcopatus Yiterbiensis, VI. Idus Junii MCCLXX., ApostoHcse sede vacante : * — " From the unroofed episcopal palace of Viterbo." — The letter in question is curious, moreover, from the statement specially made in it, that the cardinal, whose release from Conclave is requested, has altogether renounced his right to Vote on this occasion. -f But not for more than a year after this incident, — and more than a year, therefore, after the unroofing of the palace, — did the imprisoned cardinals, exposed to the elements as they were, come to an election. At last, moved, it is said, not by any threats or persuasions from without, nor by their own sufferings within their prison, but by the per- suasions of the Cardinal Bishop of Porto, and those of the Franciscan Saint Buenaventura, the Conclave was * Cancellieri, p. 6. ■f Mr. Oartwriglit remarks that tlie " insertion of this clause in the letter deserves attention, as proying that, at this period, it had not yet been definitely ruled that every cardinal's active participation was not an indispensable condition for setting a papal election beyond challenge." It does not seem likely to me, that the insertion of tho clause in question. was dictated by any such intention. I am not aware that it vras ever hold, that the active participation of every cardinal is necessary to a canonical election. And it seems to me, that the notification that His Eminence of Ostia had renounced all right and purpose of voting, -was intended to assure thoso outside that his departure from tho Conclave need not be speculated on as exunising any influence over the result of the contest. HIEEARCHY IK STATE OF FLTJIDITT, 63 persuaded, not to elect in tlie usual way, — ^that would liave involved an abnegation of wMclx those fierce partisans and good haters were incapable, — ^but to con- sent to appoint six of their number to nominate a Pope, pledging themselves to agree to and confirm the nomina- tion so made. These six electors, thus empowered, named Theobald Yisconti, at that time Archdeacon of Liege, who was not a cardinal, and who at that time was at Acre, having left England, where he had contributed to the successful establishment of Henry III.'s throne, for the purpose of accompanying the crusaders as Papal Legate; an election which has been commemorated in the follow- ing characteristic lines, by Giovanni of Toledo, the then Bishop of Porto : — " Papatus muims tulit AroMdiaoonua unus Quern Patrem Patrum fecit disoordia fratrum." This was the first instance of that mode of election, which has since taken its place as one of the three recognized methods by which a Conclave may elect a Pontiff, and which is known as Election by Compromise. But of this it will be necessary to speak by-and-by in its proper place. This Theobald Visconti, whom the Bishop of Porto somewhat superciliously thus speaks of as " one arch- deacon," being recalled by the news of his totally un- expected elevation to the Papacy, reached Yiterbo on the second of Pebruary, 1272, and was subsequently crowned in Eome as Gregory X. (ob. 1276). Mindful of the evils which had in very terrible abun- 64 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. dance visited the Churcli and the States of the Church by reason of the interregnum, and of the difficulties and scandals attending such a Conclave as the last, Gregory called a General Council of the Church (the fourteenth), at Lyons, in 1274, by which the following code of laws for the regulation of future Councils was established. Here at last, then, we do touch solid ground, and the fluid state of the institutions on which the elections of the Popes depend may be said to come to an end with the constitution of Gregory X. The rules in question are somewhat lengthy, and all of them are not of equal importance. But inasmuch as they are the foundation and charter of that which has been, for the last six centuries, the practice of the Con- claves, it will hardly be thought unnecessary to give them — ^not quite in extenso, but with considerable fulness. " I. When the Pope is dead, the cardinals shall wait for those who are absent ten days only ; at the end of which, having for nine days celebrated the obsequies of the deceased Pontiff in the city in which he resided with his Court, they shall all shut themselves up in the palace which the Pope inhabited, contenting themselves each with one sole attendant, either clerk or lay, unless there shall be evident necessity for two, for whom permission may be in such case granted ; the choice of such attendant being left to each cai-dinal for himself." Pius IV. by Bull bearing date 9th October, 1562, declared that the day of the Pope's death should be counted as one of the ten days. And ecclesiastical writers maintain that it is within the competency of the College to defer the election beyond the time HIBRAECHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 65 specified, in case any danger threatening tlie interests of the Church should require it. "II. In the palace in which the Pontiff dwelt, let a Conclave be formed in which let all the cardinals live in common, without any wall, or curtain, or veil to separate them from one another, one secret chamber being reserved. Let this Conclave be so closed on every side that nobody can enter or go out of it." The rigour of this rule was in some degree moderated by Clement VI., by a Bull dated 6th December, 1351, permitting the beds of the cardiaals in Conclave to have simple curtains. " III. Let there be no access to the cardinals shut up in Conclave. Let no one have the possibility of speaking to them secretly ; nor let it be possible for them to receive anybody, save such as may be summoned by the consent of all present solely on matters pertaining to the election. Let no one have the power of sending messages or writings to the cardinals, nor to any of the conclavists,* under pain of excommunication." The strictness of this well-intentioned rule also has been modified in practice, to the facilitating of intrigues, which it was the object of Gregory to render impossible. In modern times, whoso wishes to speak with a cardinal, or with any of those shut up in Conclave, is not pre- vented from doing so, except, as regards the cardinals themselves, during the actual time of the voting. Such speaking must take place, however, in public, that is * These are the attendants provided for in the first rule. They are in practice always clerks, are always two if not more (the latter very rarely), .and are very important personages in the conduct of all the affairs of the Conclave. 66 THE PAPAIi CONCLAVES. to say, at the " rota " * in the presence of the ofl&cials appointed for the service of the Conclave on the inside, and on the outside the prelates and others appointed for guarding the assembly. But it will be very readily understood that, if a private communication were desired, there would be little difficulty in shutting the ears of undesired hearers, especially when the person desiring so to shut them may, within a few hours, be the despotic sovereign of the hearers in question. "lY. Nevertheless, let an opening of the Conclave be left, by which food may be conveniently passed in to the cardinals, but such that no one can pass in to them by that means. [The 'rota' spoken of.'] "V. If at the end of three days from the entry into Conclave the election of the new Pope has not been accomplished, the prelates and others deputed to guard the Conclave shall, during the next five days, prevent more than one single dish from being served at the table of the cardinals either at dinner or at supper. And when these five days shall have passed, they shall after that not permit the cardinals to have aught save bread and water until such time as the election shall be completed." Clement YI. modified this rule also. Such severity, it is stated, was found to injure the health of those in Conclave ; and Clement therefore contented himself with recommending a " moderate frugality '' during • The "rota," of wliich much -n-ill be hoard in connection with tho interior arrangements and practices of the Conclave, are the apertures, with turning tables, after the fashion of tho means proyided for receiving infants at continental foundling hospitals, which are used for passing food into the Conclave, and other necessary communications. HIERAECHY IN STATE OF FLtTIDITT. 67 the entire time of the Conclave. He laid down rules, however, for the more precise defining of this moderate frugality. Meat or fish, or eggs, together with salted things, vegetables, and fruit, might be used, whether at dinner or supper. But Clement expressly forbad the cardinals from acceptiug any of these things one from another. It woxdd seem that the object of this last prohibition must have been to prevent their Eminences from clubbing their provisions together, and so securing a more varied repast. Pius IV., an ascetic and zealous man, recalled into vigour these rules, decreeing that the cardinals should be content, as they were bound to be, with one sole dish, whether at dinner or supper. Whereupon an erudite prelate* wrote a long and learned work on papal elections, in the course of which he treats at great length on the permissible component parts of this one dish. "YI. The cardinals shall, duriag the time of the Conclave, take nothing from the apostolic treasury or from its revenues, which shall during the vacancy of the see remain in the custody of such faithful and upright person as shall have the custody of them. With the death of the Pope let all ecclesiastical offices and the tribunals of the Courts cease and determine, with the exception of the Chief Penitentiary and the Treasurer, who shall continue in office during the vacancy of the see. «' VII. Let the cardinals treat of no other business in the Conclave save that of the election of a new Pope, unless the necessity of defending the territory of the * Monsigr. Cumarda, De Elect. Pont. P 2 68 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. Churcli from imminent danger should make it neces- sary for them to do so. " VIII. If any cardinal shall not enter into Conclave, or shall by reason of sickness quit the Conclave, let the election be proceeded with all the same -without such cardinal. If, however, he that has quitted the Conclave should recover let him be readmitted. Let the cardinals also who shall arrive after the others have entered the Conclave be admitted, for no one shall give any vote in the election except in Conclave. Besides which entrance cannot be denied even to cardinals who may have been censured or excommuni- cated. No one can be declared Pope unless at least two-thirds of the electors shall have concurred in electing him. Not only the cardinals, even those absent from the Conclave, but any other person, not incapacitated by just impediment, may be elected to the Papacy in this manner." The provision as to the admission to the Conclave of cardinals under censui'e or excommunication is a very important one ; and at one time during the present Pontificate it seemed likely to become very immediately important. And it will be necessary to return to the subject in a subsequent chapter. Evidently the inten- tion of the rule was to put it out of the power of a Pope to ensure the election of such or such a successor by excluding from the Conclave all such cardinals as were not disposed to vote for him, which a Pope might easily have accomplished if his censure could suffice to deprive a cardinal of his vote. As 1() (lections of persons not present in Conclave, HIEEAKCHY IN STATE OF FLUIDITY. 69 it may be noted that the last instance of the election of an absent cardinal was that of Florenz the Flemiag as Adrian VI. in 1522 ; and the last instance of the elec- tion of a Pope who had not been a cardinal was that of Prignani, a Neapolitan, and Archbishop of Bari, as Urban VI. in 1378. " IX. If the Pope shall have died outside the city in which he was residing with his court, the cardinals shall hold the Conclave ia the city within whose territory the Pope died. But if this city be under iuterdict or in rebellion, they shaU hold the Conclave in the nearest city. "X. The governors and officials of the city in which the Conclave shall be held shall see to the observance of the prescribed rules. "XI. As soon as ever the tidings of the Pope's death shall be received, such governors shall swear, in the presence of the clergy and people, who shall be assem- bled for that purpose, that they will observe the above rules. "XII. If such governors should not observe such rules, let them be excommunicated, and perpetually infamous ; let them lose their charters, and let the city be placed under interdict and lose the rank of an epis- copal see. "Xni. Let the cardinals engaged in the election lay aside entirely all private affections, and let them take heed solely to the common welfare of the Church. "XIV. No one of the sacred electors shall speak to, make promise to, or entreat in any sort any one of the •other cardinals with a view of inducing such cardinal 70 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. to incline to their own wishes in the matter of the election, under pain of excommunication. Let, on the= contrary, all bargains, all agreements, all undertakings,- even though they may have been corroborated by an oath, be held to be of no validity; and let him that breaks them be deemed worthy of praise rather than of the blame of perjury." This rule, all-important, were it not that all hope of the observance of it is absolutely futUe and vain, was confirmed by Innocent YI. in 1353 ; and Julius II., in 1505, issued a BuU against the simoniacal election of a Pope, in which it is declared that "the election of a Pope tainted by simony must be considered to possess no validity ; that the man so elected, even though he should have the vote of all the sacred electors, must be considered a heresiarch, and deprived of all honour and dignity; that a simoniacal election does not become valid either by enthronement, by adoration, by the lapse of time, nor by the obedience of the cardinals; that, on the contrary, it shall be lawful for the cardinals,^ for the clergy, and the Koman people to refuse obedience to a Pope simoniacally elected." The enactment of such a law is surely a very ciu-ious instance of the simple-minded, unreasoning, unforesee- ing, naivete of the medieval mind, which is thus shown to us as childlike as that of a Eed Indian. No pro- vision is made for the authoritative decision of the question whether an election have been vitiated by simoniacal bargainings or not ; but each unit in the whole social body is empowered to do his best towards breaking up the whole framework of society if the HIEEARCHY IN STATE OF FITJIDITT. 71 election of a Pope hare been simoniacal — that is, necessarily, if he, the unit, think so. The French ecclesiastical historian, Jean Sponde,* better known by the Latia form of his name, Spondanus, remarks (a.d. 1505), obviously enough, that the remedy provided by Julius II. would be of considerably difficult application ; "wherefore," he proceeds to add, with an amount of audacious and brazen-fronted hypocrisy and falsehood hardly to be paralleled, " God has provided that there has never been need of it." The perhaps most grossly and notoriously simoniacal election, that of Alexander VI. in 1492, was still fresh in men's minds, besides numerous other examples in more remote times. The very next election after that of Julius II. himself, when these denunciations and threats of his were brand new and fresh, that of Leo X., was unquestionably simoniacal. And the probability is that scarcely one, if one, election could be adduced during the last three centuries which has not been tainted by simony as understood and defined by Julius II. "XY. In all cities and places of importance, as soon as the death of the Pope is known, solemn obsequies shall be celebrated ; and during the vacancy of the see prayer shall be every day made to God for the speedy, unanimous, and judicious election of a new Pontiff, which the prelates shall also strive to promote by pre- scribing days of fasting." Such are the constitutions of Gregory X., which, * Sponde was born at Mauleon in 1568. His " Ecclesiastical Annals " are in fact an abbreviation of tte great work of Baronius, -wbo was his intimate friend. 72 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. thougli modified by subsequent Pontiffs in many respects, and supplemented by more minute regulations in yet more, remain to the present day the foundation and origin of all tlie law and usage observed in the papal elections up to this time, and may therefore be considered as putting an end to the fluid state of matters which has been described in the precediag chapters, and to this our first book. BOOK IL JSrOBLE BOYS AT PLAY. BOOK 11. NOBLE BOYS AT PLAY. CHAPTEE I. Latter Tears of the Middle Ages, from Gregory X. to Pius IV. — Contrast of tlie Ecclesiastical World of those Days with. Present Times. — Where Modern History commences in the Annals of the Papacy. — ^VariahUity of the Church. — Papal History falls into Groups of Popes. — Causes of this Phenomenon. — Paul III. the last of a Group of Popes. — Paul IV. the first of a different Group.— List of Popes from 1271 to 1549. We start fair, then, from the constitutions of Gregory X., made in the Council held by him at Lyons in 1274. But it "was easier in those days to make " constitutions " than to get them observed. This, though unfortunately not a peculiarity of the Middle Ages, was yet a charac- teristic belonging to them in a special manner. His- torians have considered these Middle Ages to last from the fifth to the fifteenth century — a thousand years. And though the days of Gregory X. were comparatively near the end of them, we are, therefore, not out of them yet when we arrive at that point. And the last quarter of the space so designated is, of course, that of which we know most, and which is infinitely the most impor- tant to us. We get well out of the epoch of the Middle Age before reaching the time when Pius IV. (ob. 1565) found it necessary to add a string of supplementary 76 I'HE PAPAL CONCLAVES. regulations to the Gregorian constitutions. And this second book of my story shall consist of such notices of the Conclaves during this period of two hundred and seventy-nine years, from the death of Gregory X. to the election of Paul IV. (1555) as can be found, and seem to offer any points of interest. Eegularity is an essential characteristic of modem times, of an adult state of society, that is to say. And regularity means, in the case of an iiidi"sidual, the subjec- tion of his impulses to rule, and in the body social the subjection of all that makes and marks individuality to rule. And regularity has a tendency to degenerate into that condition of senile induration in which custom is held to be the most sacred of all rules. This, to a curiously marked degree, has been the condition of the ecclesiastical world at Eome in these latter generations. Hence the immense contrast between its ways and doings in the last two centuries, and those ages with which we have now to occupy ourselves. Some poet * of our days has likened the ways and works of the men of the times in question to those of " noble boys at play.'' Unquestionably there is a nobility of its own about marked and strong individualism. And so much of it as may be discoverable in the Chm-ch we may attribute to those masterful Churchmen of the medieval times who were men first and priests afterwards, instead of, as their successors of a more tranquil time may be said to have been, priests first and men afterwards. * I bog his pardon for forgetting the namo of a ■^\ritov ■whose expres- sion struck mo liy its justness. 1 havo not, unfortunately, the moans of verifying the roforoncos at hand. NOBLE BOYS AT PLAY. 77 For these reasons the ecclesiastical /asfo' of this period offer an interest of a diBPerent kind, and one marked off from those of the subsequent period. There is also another reason for drawing a line at the death of Paul III. {ol. 1549), and making a fresh start thence. I hare spoken above of the election of Paul lY. as the point from which what may be called the modern history of the Papacy may be held to begia. There may seem, therefore, to be some iaconsistency in making the death of Paul III. the closing event of the former period. For Paul III,, Parnese, was not the immediate pre- decessor of Paul lY. ; and I have, moreover, referred to the new set of supplementary rules for the holding of the Conclaves promulgated by Pius lY. as a reason for closing the one period and opening a new one. The matter stands thus : — Paul ni., Parnese, died 1549. Julius in., his successor, GiocoM, died 1555. Marcellus II., who came next, Oervini, died the same year, 1555. Paul IV., succeeding Marcellus, Caraffa, died 1559. Pius IV., Ms successor, MedicMni, died 1565. Nevertheless, I close an epoque with the death of Paul III., and open the next with the accession of Paul lY., although it was his successor, Pius lY., who enacted the new constitutions which, ia some degree, placed the Conclaves on a new basis. And my reasons for doing so are as follows. Despite the favourite boast of the Church that she has been semper eadem — always the same — the fact is, that the Church has varied from age to age almost as much as most other human institutions, having been ever the 78 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. same only in ttis : that it has never varied in or lost sight of its object to make clerical power dominant in the world — an object that was abundantly beneficent in days when clerks were more fit than laymen to rule, but which has become still more largely noxious when the relative positions of clerk and layman in this respect were manifestly reversed. In all other points the Church has been by no means semper eadem. But although it is true that the character of the reigning Pope has often influenced to a very important degree the character, policies, and practices of the institution, as might be expected to be the case, yet the fact that the Church has been to a far more important degree influenced ia all these respects by the general com- plexion of the times and the character of the age athwart which it was at the time passing, is curiously proved by a circumstance which must suggest itself to the obser- vation of the most superficial reader of ecclesiastical history — the singular and marked divisibility of the long line of Popes into groups. Apostle Popes, warrior Popes, priest Popes, mundane Popes, pagan Popes, bigot Popes, fainSant Popes, easy-going Popes, respectable Popes, occur in the list not singly, but in groups I To a certain degree this tendency may be perceived to have been assisted by the fact that the creatures* of each Pope are mostly they who, in their turn, create his suc- cessor. But the ruling cause of the phenomena will be found in the aspect and bearing of the time. * I uso the ■word not in tlio common dopiociatory sense, but according to tho technical use of the word, as rd'orring to tho members of the Sacrod College. Tho cardinals created by each Pope arc said to bo his creaiures. NOBLE B0T8 AT PLAY. 79 Now Paul III. was in a very marked manner the last of a group of Popes. He was the last Pope whose nepotism soared to the height of making his descendants sovereign princes. Subsequent equally mundane Popes ambitioned the founding of princely Eoman houses, and founded plenty such. Paul the Farnese was the last who sought to carve out of Italy a sovereign priacipality for those of his name. He was the last, too, for the nonce, of the thoroughly mundane and grand seigneur class of Popes ; and is followed by a group of Popes of a very different and contrasted class — ^the earnest, zealous, bigot Popes, of which group I consider the Paid lY. as the first. For in fact the two intervening Papacies of Julius III., who reigned five years, and of MarceUus II., who reigned twenty-three days, were historically unimportant, and may be left out of the account. And we will make the story of the modern Papacy begin with Paul IV., and not with his successor Pius IV., notwithstanding that it was the latter who enacted the new constitutions for the regulation of the Conclaves, because Caraffa, Paul IV., was in a very marked and emphatic degree the beginner of a new epoch. In this case both the especial aspect of the times, and the strongly marked character of the man himself, con- tributed with a singular similarity and coincidence of tendency to bring about the change which at that time came over the spirit of the Papacy. The ruling cause, of course, is to be found in the growling of that Ultra- montane tempest which, with so terrible a voice, was warning Eome to put her house in order. But Caraffa 80 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES, "was, if any dyke was to be erected to save a remnant of the Church from the advancing -waves of heresy, eminently the right man in the right place ! Not at all the right man if the object were so to obey, and while obeying use, the tendencies of the time, as to avail him- self of them, for such refitting of St. Peter's barque as should make it seaworthy for many a century to come ; but eminently the right man. to force it through the breakers with an unflinching eye and iron-strong hand on the helm, on the sint ut sunt, aut non sint prin- ciple. And Paul was, in accordance with the apparently historic law which I have iudicated, the first of a group of such Popes. These, then, are my reasons for considering the death of Paul III. as the closing event of an epoch in Papal history. And I will occupy the other chapters of this second book with such extant notices of the elections of the thirty-eight Popes who ruled the Church during the two hundred and seventy-three years which elapsed from the death of Gregory X. {oh. 1276) to that of Paul III. {oh. 1549) as may seem to have any interest in them. It wUl be observed that these tliii-ty-eight Popes reigned a fraction more than seven years each on an average. 1 will conclude this chapter by giving a list of them, which may be found useful. Elected. Died. Gregory X., Visoonti 1271 . . 1276 Innocent V., Cliampagni . 1276 . . 1270 Adrian v., Fiosquo. . . 1276 . . 1276 John XXI., Jiilion. . . 1276 , 1277 Nicholas III., Orsini . . 1277 . . 1280 Martin IV., Do Brion . . 12S1 . . 12Sj Ilonorius IV., Sayolli . . 1285 . . 12S7 Nicholas IV., T>'Ascoli . 128S . . 12112 NOBLE BOYS AT PLAY. 81 Elected. Died. S. Celestine V., De Moron .... 1294 resigned 1294 Boniface VIII. Gaetani 1294 died 1303 Benedict XI. Bocoasini 1303 . . . 1304 Clement V. De Got 1305 . . . 1314 John XXII. d'Euse 1316 . . . 1334 Benedict XII. Poumier 1334 . . . 1342 Clement YI. Eoger ....... 1342 . . . 1352 Innocent VI. Aubert 1352 . . . 1362 Urban V. Grimoard 1362 . . . 1370 Gregory XI. Eoger 1370 . . . 1378 Urban VI. Prignani 1378 .. . 1389 Boniface IX. Tomaelli 1389 . . . 1404 Innocent VII. MeUorati 1404 . . . 1406 Gregory XII. Oonrario ... . 1406 resigned 1409 Alexander V. Philarge 1409 died 1410 Jobn XXTTT. Cossa 1410 deposed 1415 Martin V. Colonna 1417 died 1431 Bugenius IV. Condolmero .... 1431 . . . 1447 Nicholas V- Parentucelli 1447 . . . 1455 Calistus m. Borgia 1455 . . . 1458 Pius n. Piccolomini 1458 . . . 1464 Panl II. Barbo 1464 . . . 1471 Sixtns IV. De la Eovere 1471 .. . 1484 Innocent VIII. Cibo 1484 . . . 1492 Alexander VI. Borgia 1492 . . . 1503 Pius III. Piccolomini 1503 . . . 1503 Julius n. De la Eovere 1503 . . . 1513 Leo X. Medici 1513 . . . 1521 Adrian VI. Boyers 1522 . . . 1523 Clement VII. Medici 1523 . . . 1534 Paul III. Farnese 1534 . . . 1549 A glance at this list will show that a small defalcation must be made from the average time of each Pope's reign on account of the time lost in the various interregnums, some of which, as the list shows, have been prolonged to a considerable duration. CHAPTEE II. Election of Innocent V. — Anecdote of Ms Achievements as a Preacter. — Election of Adrian V. — Popes in the Thirteenth Century elected with- out Conclave. — Conclave in which Nicholas IV. was elected. — Mortality of Cardinals in Conclave. — Strange Inconsistency of the Anecdotist Cancellieri. — Superstition respecting the Duration of St. Peter's Eeign. — Anecdote of the papal Physician Matthew Corte. — Election of Oelestine V. — Modem Exception to the Eule requiring a Conclave to be held. — Modifications of the early Conclave Enles. — Boniface VIII. — Benedict IX. — Anecdote respecting his Death. — Conclave held at Perugia. — Grossly Simoniacal Election. — Monstrous Assertion of the Historian Spondanus. — Morone, Gregory XTV.'s Barber. — The Babylonish Captivity of the Church. — Conclave at Avignon, in 1334. — And again in 1342. — And in 13j2. — And in 1362. — Division between the Gascon Cardinals Subjects of England, and those subject to France. — Election of Urban V. not a Member of the College.' — Tentatives for restoring the Papacy to Eome. — Petrarch. — St. Bridget. — Conclave in 1370, the last at Avignon. — Gregory XI. — Difficulties of the Restoration of the See to Rome. — Eetum of Gregory XI. to Eome. — His Death in 137S. Inistocent v., a Savoyard, the successor of Gregory X., was elected according to the rules laid dovn by his predecessor, with a regularity and celerity ■which seem to argue strongly in favour of the judiciousness of the Gregorian constitutions. Gregory died in the episcopal palace of Arezzo ; and there the Cardinals entered into Conclave, and elected Pietro di Tarantasia* — as lie was called, from the name of his native province — Pope by the name of Innocent V., on the 22ud January, 1276, the day after the cardinals -went into Conclave, and in * Ilis family name wns do' Champagiii. NOBLE BOYS AT PLAY. 83 tlie first scratiny, as the new Pope failed not to tell the princes and prelates in the letters announcing his •election. It is true that the Sayoyard Cardinal must have been strongly recommended to his colleagues by a truly unparalleled feat, which he had, as we are assured, ishortly before performed. At the second Council of Xyons, the Cardinal Saint Bonaventura died, and Pietro ■di Tarantasia was appoiated to preach his funeral sermon, in the presence of the Pope, the whole of the members of the Sacred College, two patriarchs, five hundred bishops, sixty abbots, the ambassadors of many foreign princes, and above a thousand priests, from the eyes of every one of which illustrious assembly his discourse drew tears, as is clearly set forth in the introduction to the last edition of the works of S. Bonaventura, a success which he followed up by baptizing a Turkish ambassador and two of his suite. Clearly the man for St. Peter's successor ! Adrian V., Pieschi, a Genoese, the successor of the above Innocent, was elected at Yiterbo, on the 10th July, 1296. He had been somewhat of a pluralist, holding contemporaneously archdeaconries in the churches of Canterbury, Eheims, and Parma, and a canonry ia that of Piacenza. St. Pilippo Benizzi, the Servite Saiat, to whom Cardinal Fieschi had been sent by the Sacred College to offer the papacy on the death of Clement IV., 1269, refusing, that elevation for himself, foretold to the ambassador that he himself should rise to that aties and persuasions that the interests of the government of the universal Chm-ch made it impossible for him to yield to them, returned to Avignon, which he reached on the l^lth of September, NOBLE BOYS AT PLAT. 101 1370, and died on the 19tli of December of that year, in complete fulfilment, as the historians do not fail -to point out, of the prophecy of St. Bridget. The Qonclave assembled at Avignon on the canonical tenth day after the death of Urban, and immediately, by the unanimous vote of all the nineteen cardinals present, ■elected Pietro Eoger of Maumont, in the diocese of Limoges, Pope, by the name of Gregory XI., the seventh and last of the line of French Popes. Gregory seems to have been a conscientious man, and, like his two or three predecessors, made some nearer approach towards the character and conduct that might be sup- posed fitting in a ruler of the universal Church, as the duties of such a position were then understood by the best members of that Church, than any of the Popes shortly preceding the "Babylonish Captivity" had done. And these last Popes had been chosen almost entirely by French cardinals. Was it the case, that, rude, rough, and violent as the times were among those Gascon and Languedocian populations, there existed iu the social atmosphere of those races a somewhat nearer approach towards an adequate conception of the meaning and significance of the oflB.ce to be filled by the Supreme Euler of the Christian Church, than was the case among the invincibly and permanently Pagan tendencies of the Italian people ? The discussion of such an idea would lead us very much too far afield from the proposed subject of this volume. It is sufficient to have suggested it to the speculative inquirer interested in the study of national characteristics. Gregory XI. was, as I have said, to all appearances a 102 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. conscientious man, and he like Ms predecessor seems to- have felt strongly on tlie subject of restoring the Papacy to the Eternal City. Indeed he had made up his mind to do so, not merely by his temporary presence in Eome^ as his immediate predecessor had done, but by defini- tively re-transferring the Papal Court to Eome. This is proved by the fact that when he left Avignon for Eome, on the 10th of September, 1376, he was ac- companied by all the cardinals, save six, and by the whole of the members of the Pontifical Court. But this restoration was a very difficult matter — a much more difficult matter than it had been to carry the Apostolical Court from Eome to Avignon. The diffi- culties in the way of returning to Eome may be easily understood in a great degree ; and it is equally easy tO' feel assured that other obstacles and difficulties must have existed besides those which we can now descry. Further, there is no reason to doubt that the assertions of Gregory's predecessors, to the effect that the interests of the Church and the work of administering it required their presence in France, were made in all good faith and entire persuasion that such was the fact. They were Frenchmen, and were naturally conriuced that France was the true centre of the Christian world, as indeed it had for the last century or so been becoming more and more. England and English affiiii'S, the wars of her kings, and the heresies of her people, had contributed much in those latter times to the cares of the Popes. And they felt themsehes to be more .at hand for the supor\'ision of them at A^'ignou than at Eome. Then, again, if Aquitainian and Langucdocian barons were NOBLE BOYS AT PLAY. 103 masterful and high-handed, if times were rude and men violent in France, the men into the midst of whom the Popes were importuned to return were a herd of raging ruffians, cut-throats, and poisoners. The former were men who could always be awed into reverence by a due exhibition and administration of Papal Mumbo-jumbo. The latter were men whom no Mumbo-jumbo could awe into a reverence which was alien to their nature, or into superstition which too long a close acquaintance with, and handling of, Mumbo-jumbo had utterly liberated them from. And the great and all-important fact of a definitive restoration of the Papal Court to Eome was accordingly brought about by an accident after all. Gregory XI., having left Avignon, as has been said, on the 10th of September, 1376, celebrated his Christmas mass at Corneto, on his arrival in Italy. He was received with the utmost possible enthusiasm by all classes, and with the greatest pomp and magnificence-; and at once began active endeavours to repair the evils, material and moral, which had resulted from the absence of the Popes from Eome. But it was uphill work ! The Florentines were at open war with him. The petty tyrants of the papal cities joined themselves to them, whenever they were disposed to rebel against the Pope. The Eoman barons showed not the smallest disposition to obey him. And the Gascon and Breton troops, whom he had brought with him to protect him, found it hard work to do so. Gregory, we are told, was stricken with melancholy from the day of his arrival in Eome. How well we can imagine that it should have been so ! A gloomy, savage-looking, 104 THE TAPAL CONCLAVES. and half-ruined city grovelling amid the majestic ruins of the Paganism which still survived in the blood of the descendants of those who had raised them ; lawless and knowing no authority save that of the ruffian barons and their retainers, who were ever snarling over the carcass ; desolate in the midst of the ever sad and dreary Campagna ! Yes ! It may be understood that the Languedoc Pope should have been stricken with melancholy at the sight of the surroundings, and the life, and the work before him. He seems very soon to have begun to make up his mind that it would not do, and that he must return ! That, however, was far more easily said than done. The Eomans, who would not obey him, were by no means willing that he should depart. It is probable that they would have attempted, and probably succeeded, in de- taining him by violence. And it is to be remembered that his death at Eome would have suited theu* plans and wishes just as well as his continuing to Live there. For in that case there would be a Conclave at Eome, and the probability of a Pope who would continue to reside there. Gregory had, however, determined to return. But he was continually tormented by an incui-able and painful illness, and he began to foresee that he might never see his Languedoc again ! And his last act seems to indicate a conviction, not only that he had make a mistake in moving to Eome, but that it would be desirable for his successor, bo ho whom he might, to oontinue to keep the Papacy in France; for his last act was the pre- paration of a dispensing Bull, empowering the cardinals NOBLE BOYS AT PLAY. 105 to elect Ms successor either in or away from Eome, wtereTer tlie greater number of the members of tbe College might be. Now as the major part of tbe cardinals were then in Eome, and as tbey bad all been most urgent with tbe Pope to return to France, tbis Bull would seem to contemplate tbeir going away from Eome to make tbe election elsewhere, Gregory indeed was destined never to leave Eome. His last illness overtook him before be could put bis intention of returning into execution ; and he died on the evening of the 27th of March, 1378, haviag reigned seven years and all but three months, of which tbe last year and three months were passed in Italy. And thus ended the "Babylonish Captivity." CHAPTEK III. Sacred College at the Death of Gregory XI. — Anecdotes of the Conclave that elected Urhan VI. — Turbulenoe of the Eoman People. — Alarm of the Cardinals. — Oirciinistances which led to the great Schism. — Doubts respecting the Canonicity of the Election of Urban VI. — Other Causes leading to the Schism. — Irregular Election of Eobert of Geneva by the dissenting Cardinals as Clement VII., -who has always been held to be an Antipope. — Schism of thirty-nine Tears. The death of Gregory XI., wliich. overtook him at Eome when he was meditating his return to Avignon, was the means of restoring the Papacy to the Eternal City, but by no means smoothed away or cut the knot of the diffi- culties by which that restoration was surrounded. The details of the story of the Conclave which elected his successor, Bartolommeo Prignani, Archbishop of Bari, who was not a cardinal,* as Urban YI., are curious and strongly marked by the characteristics of the times. They have been preserved ia the Latin relation of a con- temporary, probably a "Conclavista,"-f which is printed in the collection published in 1691, by G. L.J * Since him no Pope has been elected who was not at the time a member of the Sacred College. t I.e., one of tho " attendants " provided for in the constitutions of Gregory. They may in accordance with them bo either clerks or laymen. In practice they nro always clerks. \ Grogorio Leti. Tho edition cited is a reprint mado at Cologne, and is in 12mo. The original edition in ito. has no date of place or year. logorio Leti was born in 1630. His inexactitude as an historian is notorious. But in the caso of those relations of the ConcLave, he is itiorcly tho cullcrlor of tho accounts of others. That of tho Conclave of NOBLE BOYS AT PLAY. 107 Gregory left tlie Sacred College consisting of twenty- three cardinals, of wliom four only were Italian. There was one Spaniard, and all the others were French. Some of these had remained at Avignon ; and sixteen only (as Moroni says, reckoning one Spaniard, eleven French, and four Italians ; or seventeen, as the old Conclavista says) entered into Conclave on the 7th of April, 1378.* But, as the Conclavista relates, without the smallest appearance of any consciousness that he is telling that which vitiated the whole election, t they met before entering into Conclave to discuss the matter, and see what prospect there was of coming to an agreement. This at once appeared to he but small. For although the eleven French cardinals were strong enough to have elected one of their own body, who would have carried the Papacy back into France, as they ardently wished, if they had been unanimous, there was a principle of division among them which deprived them of their power. The difficulty arose from the fact that the French cardinals, though all French, were not all from the Diocese of Limoges ; as (from the circumstance of three out the line of seven French Popes, Clement VI., Innocent YI., and Gregory XI., having been natives of Urban VI. is shown to be by a contemporary, by tlie statement tliat Joanna of Naples "was and is " a person much esteemed by the cardinals. * CancelUeri, withhis usual carelessness, says on the Uth of September, which could in no wise have been the case ; a blunder which is the more strange in that in the same passage he quotes Leti's Oonclayista, who gives the date correctly. ■)■ His words are, " Cardinales ante ingressum Conclavis simul in certo loco aUquando congregati inter se colloquium habuerunt super persona (sic) futuri Pontiflcis tractantes et colloquentes, qui tamon nou potuerunt concordare." Compare this with the Uth of Gregory X.'s. rules. 108 THE PAPAL CONCLAVES. that diocese) was the case with a considerable number among them. The other French cardinals, determined that the Papacy should not become the hereditary pro- perty of the Limoges clergy,* were ready to unite with the Italian cardinals even in the election of an Italian, if by no other means could they prevent the election of a Limoges man. In this frame of mind they cast their eyes upon the Archbishop of Bari, — '' unum Archiepis- copum Barensem," as the Eoman Conclavista somewhat contemptuously calls him, — no other indeed than oui* Bartolommeo Prignani, who, if to a Eoman conclavist he was " one Archbishop of Bari," was sufficiently well known in the ecclesiastical world of Chi-istendom, and Avho eventually became Urban YI. The reasons for the choice are given as follows by the concla-sist : It was hoped that the Italian cardinals would agree to elect him, an Italian, rather than another Frenchman ; while it was thought on the other hand that the Ultra- montanef cardinals would agree "because the Bari Archbishop was a very learned man, used to business, erudite, and instructed in the style of the Curia and Chancery, "J and from his early years the familiar com- panion and domestic chaplain of the Cardinal Yicc- * ' ' Concordarunt cum cardinalibus Italicis do liabondo potius Italicum quam unum Lemovicensom, dicentes aporti' quod totus muudus admodum vicciit