yw48 FRAGILE DOES NOT CIRCULATE . -i.,.'j--rr^^->^: >"i*^-'S'^-':K''.,i«w' ■■■.V<^ 'tv,. i&mmW Utttivnsiitg f ibatg THE GIFT OF .ti...^iX,.^12ftJ^.A...'Sa/J^etvA.... f "S DATE DUE RETURN TO ENTOMOLOGY LIBRARY Cornell University Ithaca, N. Y. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology AT HARVARD COLLEGE. Vol. XXX. No. 4. ON THK COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS OF MOTllS AND BUTTERFLIES. I' (ioUDSBOROUGI! MAfGIt. ca:\ieridge, mass., U. S.A. : printed for the museum. fubbuary, 1807. 1 ive Zobl^ /j J Bulletin of the Mnseum of Comparat: AT HARVARD COLLEGE, Vol. XXX. No. 4 ON THE COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS OF MOTHS AND BUTTERB^LIES. By Alfred Goldsborough Mater. With Ten Plates. CAMBRIDGE, MASS., U. S. A. : PRINTED FOR THE MUSEUM. FEBRnART, 1897. > '^^o^^']'JE7tt, C,U..^H^ No. 4. — On the Color and Color-l^atterns of Moths and Butter- flies} Hv Aj.KKKI) (iol.DSliOKorCII Mayku. This reseai-cli is an investigation of the general jilienoniena of Color iti Lepidojitera, and also a special account of the Color-Pattei-ns of the ])anaoid and Acraeoid Tlelieonidae, and of the I'apilios of Tro])ical South America, and has been carried out under the direction of my friend and instructor, Dr. Charles B. Davenport ; and the work was done in connection with one of the coui'ses given liy him in Harvard University in 1894-95. ■' I am indebted to Dr. Davenport not only for suggesting the subject, but also for his kindness in devot- ing much time to a criticism of the results. The |)aper is divided into three parts. I'art A contains an ac- count of the general phenomena of color in Lepidoptera; Part B is devoted to a special discussion of the color-variations in the Ileli- conidae, with special reference to the phenomena of mimicry; and Part C consists of a summary of those results which are believed to be new to science. A Table of Contents is given at the end of the paper. PART A. GENERAL PHENOMENA OF COLOR IN LEPLDOJ^TERA. L Classification ov Colous. We follow Poulton ('90) in dividing L('])idoj)terous colors into (1) pigmental and (ii) structural. (1) Pigmental Colors are due to tlie presence of an actual ])ig- ment within the scales, and although such colors are very common in the Lepidojitera, it is frequently very difficult to say ol'f-hand whether a given color is due to a ]>igrnent or to some structural effect. Coste ('90-'91) and Urech ('9!!) have, however, given criteria for de- termining whether a color is due to a pigment or to some other cause. They succeeded, for example, in dissolving out the color in many ' C(>iitril>iitiot situated upon nerviu'e 1'' is often absent. The system of markings is therefore undergoing degeneration at thi.s end (cf. Fig. 18, cell V) . The curved mark upon nervure 5 (Fig. 12) projecting into cell V is plainly symmetrical with respect to its fellow in the opposite side of cell V, and not with its near companion whidi projects into cell IV. The same is also true in the case of the spots in cell VI. In Fig. l-'} the spots appear at the first glance to be bilaterally symmetrical about both nervures and centers of cells, but in cell IV the marking situated on nervui-e 4 does not quite reach to the cen- ter, and it is interesting to observe that its fellow on nervure 5 also falls short of reaching the center and is therefore symmetrical with respect to the other curved spot in cell IV. This case also furnishes an instance of a break in the middle of a linear series. Ficr. 14 is taken from the inider surface of the hind wing of Papilio emalthion. It serves to illustrate the fusion of two orig- inally separate rows of spots. In this case the crescent-shaped spots above have fused with the rectang>ilar ones below, so as to inclose a portion of the ground color of the wing. Sometimes two rows of 1 A veiy beaiitlfiU cxcei)tioii (Fig. ID, IMiite 2) to this rule for the crescents found in oye- spots is seen in the under surface of tlie tore wint; of Missanga patinia Moore. It will lie noticed that the large blaclc crescent found in this beautiful eye-spot is !I0° away from its usual position. This is the only exception of the sort known to nie. MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PAT'PERTS'S. 187 spots of different colors fuse, giving a chain of spots wliicli arc of one color above and anotlier below. In Fig. 16 the spots composing the row 15M are blue (dark) above, and red (light) below. It will be observed that the color is bilatei'alljf symmetrical, as usual, about the axis tlirougli the middle of the cell. Such bicolored spots are often due to a simple fusion, as before stated ; but sometimes they may, perhaps, be intrinsically bicolored. Fig. 15 is a beautiful instance of an exception to the general rule that spots are bilateral about the axis through the center of the cell. It is taken from Ornithoptera trojana Staudinger.' The light spots represented near the outer edge of the wing are of a brilliant irides- cent green. It is evident that they are distinctly bilateral with respect tothe tier v ur es ; especially is this true of the pair adjacent to nervure 1 . Ornithoptera brookiana Wallace illustrates another exception, though in a less marked degree.^ Otlier allied species of Ornithoptera, however, would seem to show that these apparent exceptions may have been derived from forms whicli exhibited two spots in each cell and followed the usual rule. These are the only instances of such exceptions known to me. I do not doubt, how- ever, that fui-ther study would reveal others. In Fig. 17 an exam|)Ie is given of the peculiar kind of eye-.spots found in the Saturn idae. The sj)ecies from which the figure was taken is Saturnia spini. It will be seen that this so-called eye-spot is quite different in formation from the ocelli of butterflies. It is simply a series of curved cross-bands between nervures, arranged symmetrically on both sides of the cross vein CC. The "eye- spots " upon the wings of Attacus luna and in the genus Telea are also of this sort. True eye-spots, however, similar to those found among the Morphos and Satyridae, occur in moths, as in the apex of the fore wing of Samia cecropia, Callosamia promcthea, etc. " False " eye-spots are also found on the wings of butterflies ; in Vanessa io, for example, the so-called eye-spot of the fore wing has been shown by Dixey ('90) to be made np of a series of fused spots. It will be remembered that Merrifleld ('94, Plate 9, Fig. 4) caused this " ocellus " to break up into its constituents by subjecting the pupa to a tem]>erature of 1° C The ocellus upon the hind wing of Vanessa io is no doubt a true eye-spot; the only evidence which ' See Watkins, '91, Plate i. 'See Hewitaon, '5C-'7(i, Vol. 1. 188 BULLETIN: MUSFAIM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. miglit lead one to infer that the occlhis of the fore wing was of the same character is, that an aberrant form is sometimes found in nature having the " eye-spots " on botli fore and hind wings obliterated, thus indicating a possible connection between the two (see South, '89). Kig. 18 is intended to illustrate the process of degeneration occur- ring in bands. Band BU is rej)resented as breaking down by the rare method of parting in the middle. Example, Melinaea parallelis. Band EE is degenerating at one end ; this is a very common method. Figs. 20-28 represent hypothetical conditions not found in nature ; all being contrary to the conditions of the laws which have just been stated. In Fig. 20 row RR presents three spots for each cell. I believe this has not been found in nature, but I should not be surprised if it were discovered, for it is not contrary to any of the laws. Row CC, on the other hand, is contrary to the law of bilaterality, the crescents not being bilateral about axe.s passing thi-ough the middle of the interspaces parallel with tlie longitudinal nervures. Fig. 21 is intended to show a series of spots arranged side by side in twos in each cell, and of different colors. This, I believe, is impossible, for it is contrary to the law of bilaterality of color arrangement about the usual axis (HH, Figs. 6, 7). In Fig. 22 there are several conditions which are impossible ; e. tera (see Dimmock, '88). This is only another of the numerous instances met with in nature where similar conditions of selection have developed complex organs which are similar in appearance, though found in widely .sej)arated groups. A list of papers I'clating to the development of scales has been given by Dimmock ('88, p. 1-11). Most of the haii-s which cover the body-surface in Arthropods arc true sensory structures, the axis of each of which is a protoplasmic process from a single cell of the hypodermis, which lies below the cuticula. They liave probably been developed because the cuticula, MAVKU: COLOR AND COLOli-l'ATTKRNS. 193 bc'iiij^ liiiid, chitiiious, luid iiiHoxihlo, would seivo but poorly as a ta(!tile or sensory surface. Of course no one would venture to ascribe any sensory function to the scales which cover the wing-nionibranes of the Le])idoptera. We may, however, make severiil more or less reasonable hypotheses concerning tlic ])robable uses of the scales, and by testing these sup- ])ositions arrive ])erhaps at some plausible explanation of their reten- tion and the complex development which they have undergone. (1) They may have caused the wings of the ancestors of the T.epidoptera to become more perfect as organs of flight, by causing the frictional resistance between the air and the wing-surface to become more nearly an optimum. (2) The appearance and develo|)ment of the scales may have served, as Kellogg ('94) has suggested, " to protect and to strengthen the wing-membranes." (3) The present development of the scales may be due to the fact that they displayed colors which were in various ways advan- tageous to the insects. Concerning the first of these three hypotheses, the wing has, broadly speaking, two chief functions to perform in flight. It must beat more or less downward against the air, and must, in addition, glide or cut through the air, supporting the insect in its flight. For the mere beating against the air a relatively larc/c co-cflicient of friction between the air and the wing might be advantageous ; but for gliding and cutting through the air a «w?a// co-efficient of friction would certainly be an advantage. There must therefore be an optimum co-eflicient of friction, which lies somewhere between these two. In order to determine the co-eflicient of friction between the wing and the air, use was made of a method which, in one form or another, has long been known to engineers ; that is, of observing the ratio of damping of the vibrations of a pendidum. It is well known that when a pendulum is swinging free, and uninfluenced by any fi-ictional resistances, the law of its motion is expressed by the formula, (i) d:= A sin ^ t where d is the displacement of the pendulum from its middle ])osition after the interval of time t, A is the maxinnim displace- ment and T the time of a complete vibration, back and forth. If, 194 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY, liowever, frictioiial resistances interfere, the formula becomes, (2) (1 = A c-K' sin — t 1 —log d T, (5) Hence, K = -r~j --■ .,' ^. , , or if t = T, ^ ' ' A log e sni '2ir t- ' ' —log d (^) K = ^^^ where K is a constant dependent upon the friction, e is the base of the Napierian system of logarithms and T, is the time of a complete vibration, wliich may be different from the T, i-epresentiiig the time of vibration when not under tlie influence of friction. The plan was, then, to attach the wing of some large butterfly or moth to the end of a short, light pendulum in such a way that it would either fan against the air, or cut through it, and then to observe the ratio of damjjing of the pendulum's vibrations. A drawing of the pendulum with a wing attached is given in Plate 1, Fig. 3. The wing is here shown in the position for "cutting or glid- ing" through the air. It would be in the position for fanning against the air, if it were rotated 90°. 'IMie pendulum was made of brass and steel, the ends being of brass and the slender middle portion of steel. Its vibrations were read off upon an arc graduated in milli- meters. The readings were certainly accurate down to 0.5 mm. The pendulum was hung upon a steel knife edge (n, n, P^ig. 3), which rested upon Arm level glass bearings. The pendulum was 24.21 cm. long, and weighed 19.G1 grams. Its time of vibration (Tj) was 0.877 seconds. This rate of vibration was practically unaltered when a wing was fastened to the end of the pendulum, the reason being that the wings were very light, the heaviest, that of Samia cecropia, weighing only 0.038 grams. The wing to be experi- mented upon was fitted into a deep, narrow slot at the fi-ee end of the pendulum, and then cemented in by means of a little melted beeswax. It thus became a perfectly rigid part of the pendulum itself. The pendiilmii with wing attaclied was deflected through a known arc, read off upon the millimeter scale, and its reading at the end of the first swing carefully observed. Then if A be the initial deflec- tion, which we may call unity, and if d be the reading after the first swing, the ratio of damping is given by the expression -j. In experi- menting with a fore wing of Samia cecropia "fanning the air," it MAYKR: COLOR AND COLOR-l'ATrEUNS. 195 was found, as tlie mean of many trials, that this ratio of damping was 0.919, that is to say, the amplitude of tlie 2d swing was 0.919 as great as the amplitude of the 1st, that of the 8d only 0.919 as great as tliat of the '2d, and so on. The scales were tlien carefully removed from the wing-membranes, by means of a camel's hair brush, and by again testing the vibrations it was found that the new ratio of damping was 0.917. This is so near the value of the ratio of damp- ing with the scales on (0.919), that it may be considered identical, the difference being due to errors of experimentation. Hence we must conclude that the presence of the scales upon the wing-membrane has not altered, appreciably, the co-eflicient of fric- tion which would exist between scaleless wing-membranes and the air. The results indicate rather, that when the scales appeared upon the wings of the scaleless, clear-winged ancestors of the Lepidoptera, the po-efKcient of friction remained unaltered. This tempts one to the further conclusions, that the co-efficient of friction between the air and the wings was already an optimum in these clear-winged an- cestors before the appearance of the scales, and therefore that Natural Selection would operate to keep it unaltered. A wing of Samia cccropia cut so as to give it the same shape and dimensions as one of Morpho menelaus, gave an identical damping ratio. I conclude that the co-efficient of friction miiy be the same for both moths and l)utterflies, at least for those which move theii- wings at about the same rate in flight. It was found in the case of the Samia cecropia wing, that when it was vibrated in the position for " cutting through " the air, the ratio of damping was 0.991. It will be remembered that, when the wing "fanned" the air, this ratio was 0.917. We may find the ratio be- tween the resistance encountered in " fanning" and that encountered in "gliding" through the air by substituting these values in equa- — log d tion (4), K = ATTbi"^- Thus for fanning, -r- = 0.917 and Tj = 0.877. Making A unity, —log 0.917 K= ,, ,,,^, = 0.1. 0.877 log e d In cutting tln-ough the air, -r =0.991 and Tj as before = 0.87 * . _losr 0.991 Hence in this case K =:jr~7r,,^-. = 0.01. 0.877 loii