t;i:RiJ>! (SortipU ICam Bt^acl IGibtary Cornell University Library KF 354.G4M65 v1 The bench and bar of Georgia :memoirs an 3 1924 018 776 199 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31 92401 87761 99 THE BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA: MEMOIRS ATO SKETCHES. CONTAINING A COURT ROLL FROM 1790 TO 1857, ETC. BY STEPHEN P. MILLER. VOLUME L PHILADELPHIA: J. B. LIPPINCOTT & CO. 1858 .Entered according to Act of Congress, in tlie year 1S58, by J. B. LIPPINCOTT & CO. in the Clerk's 0£fice of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of FennsylTania. CONTENTS OF VOL. I. CHAPTER I. Geoeqe D. Anderson — Born in South Carolinai — Removal of Parents to Georgia — Labors as a Mechanic in the Manufacture of Cotton-Gina — Studies Law — Admitted to the Bar — Partnership with J. M. Calhoun, Esq., at Decatur — Elected Colonel of the Regiment — Appointed Brigade-In- spector — Appointed by President Van Buren Commissioner to iuTestigate alleged Frauds on the Indians in Alabama — Representative in the Legis- lature from De Kalb — Removes to Marietta — Senator from Cobb County — Elected Solicitor-General of the Coweta Circuit — ^Elected Judge of the Cherokee Circuit — Sudden Death at Spring Place in 1843 — Proeeedings of the Bar — His Character, &c 17 CHAPTER II. RoBEET Augustus Beau — Native of Maryland — Removal of Parents to Georgia in 1808 — Completes Education at Raleigh, North Carolina — Studies Law in Augusta under Judges Reid and Montgomery — Admission to the Bar — Locates in Marion — Partnership with Col. T. G. Holt — ^Ap- pointed Solicitor-General by Gov. Troup — Duel with Thomas D. Mitchell — Elected to the Legislature in 1825 and 1826 — Supports the Administra- tion of Gov. Troup — Appointed Aide-de-Camp to Maj. Gen. Wimberly — Counsel for Judge Fort in 1827 — Marriage in 1828 — Partnership with S. F. Miller — Elected again to the Legislature in 1830 — His course in that body — Resolutions on the Tariff, and in favor of President Jackson — Appointed Aide-de-Camp to Gov. Gilmer — Removes to Macon in 1832 — Partnership vrith Col. Seymour — Delegate to the Anti-Tariff Convention — Elected Brigadier-General — .Serves on the Committee at the State-Eights Meeting in November, 1833 — Edits the Georgia Messenger — Defeated for Congress by Gen. Glascock — Character as an Advocate and Debater — Re- nounces Skepticism and joins the Church — Health declines — Lingering Illness — His Death in 1836 — Funeral Honors— Testimonials of the Bar, Literary Societies, &c 21 CHAPTER III. John Macpherson Berrien, LL.D. — Huguenot Ancestry— Born in New Jersey in 1781 — Removal of Parents to Georgia — Graduates at Princeton at the age of fifteen years — Classmate of Judge Gaston — Reads Law with o [ CONTENTS. PA6Z the Hon. Joseph C!lay — Admitted to the Bar in 1799 — Elected Solicitor- General in 1809 — Jndge of the Eastern Circuit in 1810 — Declares the Alle- viating Law unconstitutional — Commands a Volunteer Regiment of Cavalry in the War of 1812 — Conduct touching the Sentence of Hopkins vindicated by the Legislature in 1818 — Twelve years Judge of the Superior Court — Elected a State Senator from Chatham County in 1822 and 1823 — ^Proposes Digest of the Laws of England in force in Georgia — Elected to the Senate of the United States in 1824— Takes his Seat March 4, 1825 — ^Delivers his Discourse on Eloquence at Athens in 1828 — In January, 1829, submits Georgia Protest against the TariflF — ^Besigns his Seat in Senate — Appointed Attorney-General of the United States, March, 1829 — Address before the Societies of Princeton College in 1830 — ^Degree of Doctor of Laws con- ferred by that Institution — ^Besigns Office in the Cabinet in 1831 — Corre- spondence with President Jackson — ^Returns to Georgia — Serves in the Free-Trade Convention at Philadelphia in 1831 — ^Authgr of the Address to the People of the United States — ^Reception at MiUedgeville in November, 1831 — Practises Law in the Supreme Court at Washington — Appears at the Anti-Tariff Convention in MilledgevUle, 1832 — ^Prepares the Report of the Committee of Twenty-One — Appointed by the Governor in 1838 on a Special Commission — Extracts from the Report — ^Again elected to the United States Senate in 1840 — Support of Whig Measures — ^Report on the BUI to repeal the Bankrupt Law — The Legislature of Georgia censures his course in 1841 — Same body expresses its full approbation in 1843 and assures him of the public confidence — ^Attends the National Whig Conven- tion at Baltimore in 1844 — Chairman of the Committee to notify Mr. Clay of his Nomination — Speech in Boston on the Tariff in 1844 — Resigns his Seat in the Senate in 1845 — Is immediately re-elected, and prevailed on to accept — ^Address to his political friends on the occasion — ^Declines being a Candidate for the Bench of the Supreme Court of Georgia — ^Re-elected to tiie Senate in 1847 — Position in 1848 relative to Mr. Clay and General Taylor — Letter to CoL Owen — Opposes the Public Reception of Kossuth in 1851 — Other Measures discussed — Death of Mrs. Berrien in February, 1852 — Resigns his Seat in the Senate, May, 1852 — ^Appears as Counsel in the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Bank Cases — ^Issues an Address in Defence of the American Party, September, 185-5 — ^Presides at the State Convention of the Party in December, 1855 — ^His Illness at MiUedgeville — ^Return to Savannah — His Death, January 1, 1856 — Testimoniala of Respect to his Memory — ^Proceedings of the Bar in the Supreme Court — Resolutions of Condolence and Respect in the Legislature — A New County named " Berrien" — Tribute from the American Bible Society — His Cha- racter 44 CHAPTER IV. Edwabd J. Bi,ACE — ^Bom in South Carolina — Goes to School in Augusta — Studies Law, and admitted to the Bar in 1827 — Practises with Judge Reid — ^Writes Hnmorons Articles for the Press — Sharpness in Debate — Marriage with Jliss Eirkman, of BamweU District— Elected to the Legis- lature in 1829 and 1830— Proposes to remove State University from Athens to MiUedgeville — "Bucket Letters" — Defeated for Attorney- General in 1831 — Elected to Congress by the Whigs in 1838 — Supports Mr. Van Bnren for President in 1840 — ^Bemiuns six years in Congress, CONTKHTS. 5 from 1839 to 1845 — Bepntation in Debate — ^Bold and independent as a Politician — Social Qnalities — ^Kne Perception of the Lndicrons — Objects to all Parade and Mannerism in Society — ^Uniform Patron of Merit — Min i! depressed by Symptoms of Consumption — Taste for Mnsic — Power of Mimicry — ^Fond of Anecdotes — Kindness to the Poor — ^Last Ulness Besignation to his Fate — Death in 1849 „.. no CHAPTEK T. DoxcAS G. Campbeix — ^Natire of North Carolina — Gradnates at Chapel Hill University in 1806 — BemoTes to Georgia — Takes charge of a Female Aca- demy in Wilkes Coimty — ^Beads Law with Jndge Griffin and succeeds to his Practice — ^Elected Solicitor-General in 1816 — ^BepresentatiTe in the Legislature three years — ^Partnership with (ramett Andrews — ^In 1824 appointed by President Monroe a Commissioner to negotiate Treaty with Creek Indians — ^FaUnre of Treaty at Broken Arrow, December, 1824 — Conclnsion of Treaty at the Indian Springs, Febroary, 1825 — Corre- spondence with Gov. Tronp and the Secretary of War — Indian Disturb- ances — Death of Mcintosh — Mission of Gen. Gaines — Conduct of the Agent for Indian Affairs — ^Investigation by Georgia Commissioners — Con- troversy between Gov. Tronp and the President — ^Abstract of the Corre- spondence — Good Faith of the Treaty established — Successful Issue — ^Acts as Trustee of the Univerraty — ^Advocate of Female Education — ^Prospects for Governor — His Death in 1828 — Domestic Matters — Sketch of his Son, Mr. Justice Campbell, of the Supreme Court of the United States 115 CHAPTEB VI. AvcusTiN S. CiATTOH — ^Bom in Virginia — Parents remove to Georgia^ Angnstin becomes a Student in the Kichmond Academy — ^Ecceives a Book from Gen. Washington as the Beward of Merit — Gradoates at Franklin College in 1804 — Beads Law with Judge Cames — la licensed to practise, and locates in Franklin County — ^Marriage wifli Miss JnUa Cames — Ee- moves to Athens — Compiles the Laws of Georgia from 1800 to 1810 — Elected Judge of the Superior Court in 1819 and in 1822 — ^Defeated by the Clark Party in 1825 — ^Writ^ the Mysterious Picture — Literary Ad- dress at Athens in 1828 — ^Again elected Jndge in 1828 — Case of the Mis- sionaries — Troubles in the Gold-Be^on — ^Beaten for Be-election in 1831 — Immediately elected to Congress — Opposition to the Tariff — ^Letter to the Globe — Moves for a Conmiittee to investigate United States Bank — Speech on the Subject — List of British Stockholders — ^Approves the Bemoval of the Deposits — ^Letter reviewing the action of former Secretaries of the Treasury — ^Beport on the Public Lands — Serves in the Anti-Tariff State Convention in 1832 — Chairman of the Committee of Thirteen at the great State-Bights Meeting in 1833 — ^Beports the Platform — Be-elected to Con- gress — ^Voluntarily retires in 1835 — Devotes himself to Factory Operations — ^Literary Employments — Trustee and warm supporter of the Universify of Georgia — Is attacked with Paralysis in 1838 — ^Partial Bestoration — Investigates the Evidences of Christianity — Unites with the Chnrch — Tes- timony in favor of Beligion — ^His Death in 1839 — Exti^cts from the Funeral Discourse of Bev. Whiteford Smith — Tributes of the Press and of Literary Societies — Character for Wit, Benevolence, and the Domestic Affeetions — ^Letter of Chancellor Kent 139 6 CONTENTS. PiSI CHAPTER Vn. Paui. Coalsoh— Birth in 1799— Goes to the School of Dr. Church, at Eaton- ton ^Enters Franklin College — Graduates in 1824^-Beads Law with Judge Clayton — Admitted to the Bar — Marries Miss Blackshear in 1825 ^Removes to Thomas County — Influential Family Connection — Obtains a good Practice — His Social Qualities — ^Extent of the Southern Circuit — Members of the Florida Bar— John Taylor— The Sulky-Eace— Professional Zeal— Hospitality of Mr. Coalson— His Death in 1830— Proceedings of Bar 193 CHAPTER Vni. Walter T. Colvuitc — Bom in Tirginia — ^Parents remove to Hancock County, Georgia — ^Walter sent to School at Mount Zion— Progress in Learning — Actiyity in Sports — Goes to Princeton, New Jersey, and wears a Hat of Babbit-Skins — ^Betnms home, owing to Hlness of his Father — Beads Law with CoL Eockwell— Admitted to the Bar in 182ft— First locates at Sparta and then in Walton County — ^Elected Brigadier-General — Buns for Congress and is nearly elected in 1826 — ^Elected by the Le^s- latnre first Judge of the Chattahoochee Circuit in 1826 — Eeference to his Decision by Gov. Forsyth — ^Be-elected Judge in 1829 — Senator from Mus- cogee County in 1834 and 1837 — ^Elected a BepresentatiTe to Congress in 1838 by the Whig Party — ^Befnses to support Gen. Harrison for President — Is re-elected to Congress in 1840 and 1842 — At the session of 1842 elected by the Legislature a Senator in Congress — Supports the Mexican War — ^Exertions in the Presidential Canvass — ^Influence over Public Assemblies — Style of Oratory original — Success before Juries — Southern Bights in 1850 and 1851 — Delegate to the Nashville Convention — Besolu- tions of that Body — EflForts to establish the Compromise Line — ^Honest and fearless in his aims — ^Religious Character — The Pulpit and Serial Freedom contrasted — Motives often misconceived — General Benevolence — Family Relations — Inroads of Disease — Starts for Montvale Springs — Dies at Macon in 1855 — Public Grief — Proceedings of the Bar of the Supreme Court 202 CHAPTER IX. William H. Cbawfoed — ^Bom in Virginia in 1772 — Parents came to South Carolina in 1779, and thence to Geoi^^ in 1783 — After diligent prepara- tion, William teaches School — Studies the Classics under Dr. Waddel — Becomes his Assistant— Unites with Mr. Tait in the Richmond Academy — Comes to the Bar in 1799 — Settles in Lenngton — Marries Miss Gardine — Compiles the Georgia Statutes — Duel with Van Allen — Represents O^e- thorpe in the Legislature — Conduct of Judge Tait vindicated — Duel with Gen. Clark — Commission to ascertain 35th degree of North Latitude — Offers Besolntions in 1806 requesting President Jefferson to serve a third term, which are unanimously adopted by the Georgia Le^slatore — '■ Elected to the United States Senate in 1807 — Appointed Minister to France — Interview with the Emperor Napoleon — Letters to Mr. Clay, at Ghent — Appointed Secretary of War in 1815 — Appointed Secretary of the Treasury in 1816 — Administration of the Finances until March 8, 1825 — Is a Candidate for President in 1824 — Attack of Paralysis — Mr. Adams elected President — ^Letter of Mr. Jefferson — Return to Georgia — Public Dinner at MiUedgeviUe in November, 1825 — Appointed Judge of CONTENTS. / PACK the Northern Circuit in 1827 — ^Elected to the same Office by the Lcgisla- tore in 1827, 1828, and 1831 — His tenacious Memory — Chairman of the Convention of Judges — Social Correspondence with Henry Clay — ^Letter to C. J. Ingersoll on United States Bank — ^Death on the Circuit in 1834 — His Character— Votes of Electoral College in Georgia from 1788 to 1856.. 218 CHAPTER X. William Cboceer — ^North Carolina his native State — Comes to (xeorgia in Early Manhood — ^Marriage with Miss Long — ^Teaches School — Studies Law under Judge Early — ^Licensed to practise by Judge Cames in 1810 — En- gages in Merchandise— Unsuccessful — ^Resumes his School — Settles in Twiggs County — Obtains large Business — Members of the Bar from 1811 to 1825 — Several times elected to the Legislature — Appointed Judge- Advocate — ^Exploits of Sword in the hands of Sergeant M. — Visit of Gen. La Fayette to Milledgeville — La Fayette Volunteers, from T?riggs — Rivals at the Bar in Marion — Judge Fort and others — Character of R. A. Evans — Major Crocker acquires a large Property — ^Retires from the Bar — ^Names of Children — His Death in 1836 — ^Reputation and Personal Appearance 347 CHAPTER XI. WiLLLAX C. Dawson — Bom in Greene County — ^Educated at the Academy of Rev. Dr. Cumming — Graduates at Franklin College in 1816 — ^Reads Law with Judge Cobb — ^Attends the Law-School of Judges Reeve and Gould at Litchfield, Connecticut — Admitted to the Bar in 1818 — Opens an Office at Greensboro — Marries Miss Wingfield — ^Rapidly advances in his Profession — Elected Clerk of the Honse of Representatives In 1821 — Sup- ports Gov. Troup and the Old Trea^ — Compiles Laws of Georgia in 1830 — Elected to the Legislature — Efforts in behalf of State-Rights — Mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States disregarded — Raises a Volunteer Company and serves under General Scott in 1836 — Elected a Representa- tive to Congress in 1836, 1838, and 1840 — Nominated for Governor in 1841 — Defeated by Gov. McDonald — ^Resigns his Seat in Congress — ^Table of Votes for Governor from 1825 to 1855 — Appointed Judge of the Supe- rior Court by Gov. Crawford in 1845 — ^Elected to the Senate of the United States in 1847 — TT'b Course in that Body — Opposes the Formal Reception of Kossuth — Speeches on varions subjects — On the Bill granting Lands to Iowa for Railroads — On the Homestead Bill-^Urges Claim of Dr. Long to the Discovery of Practical Ansesthesia to be used for Surgical Operations in the Army — Presents Resolutions of the Le^slature on Nebraska to the Senate — ^Explanation as to " ^Thig Caucus" — Speech on " Log-RoUing" in the Legishitionof Congress — Social Letters — Great Humor and Urbanity — Retires from the Senate March 4, 1855 — ^Domestic Relations — His Death, May 5, 1856 — Funeral Ceremonies — 'Manifestation of Sorrow and Respect by the Masonic Lodges — Proceedings in the Supreme Court — Additional Sketch by Judge Sisbet .'. 2t50 CHAPTER XIL Seabobs Dels — ^Early Life unknown — Son of David Delk, Esq., the first Clerk of Wilkinson Superior Court — Sprightly Talents — ^Neat and ready 8 CONTENTS. PAGE Penmanship — Skill in Legal Forms — ^Beads Law with Judge Warren — Admitted to the Bar by Judge Kenan in 1828 — Opens an Office at Irwin- ton — ^Elected Colonel of the Wilkinson Regiment — Legal Associates — Marriage with Mies Coats, of Lanrens, in 1831 — Bemoyes to Marion in 1832 — Bides the Southern Circuit — Bold and Successful — ^Pushes himself into Cases — Ambitious of Gain— Personal Difficulty — Correspondence — Mediation of Major Howard — Publicity to the Affair — Letter of Judge Gaston — Col. Selk assaults his Adversary with intent to murder — Criminal Prosecution — Friends interpose — Amicable relations restored — Nolle prosequi entered — Change of Politics — His Death in 1884 — Character 318' CHAPTEB XIIL JoHH M. DooLT — ^Ancestors from North Carolina — J. M. Dooly bom in Lincoln County, Georgia — His Father killed by the Tories in the BeTO-< Intion — ^Early Life not ascertained — Solicitor-General in 1802 by Execu- tive Appointment — Elected to the same Office by the Legislature in 1804 — A Eepresentative from Lincoln County — Irregular Habits — Defence of Medical Students — ^Wit and Sarcasm — Variety of Anecdotes — Breaks a Faro-Bank — Challenged by Judge Tait — Equality in the Duel — ^Elected Judge of the Western Circuit in 1816 — Judge of the Northern Circuit in 1822 and 1825— His Death in 1827 — Description of his Person — Letters of Gov. Gilmer, A. Pope, Esq., Judge Andrews, Judge Thomas, and Dr. Slappey, giving incidents — Bemarkable Gifts — Character 831 CHAPTEB XIV. Petek Eaklt — Bom in Virginia, 1773 — Father removes to Georgia in 1795 — Peter graduates at Princeton College — Studies Law under Mr. Inger- soU in Philadelphia — After thorough Preparation, comes to the Bar — Strong Competition — ^Bapid Advancement — Elected to Congress in 1802 — Serves on the Committee with Mr. Bandolph to impeach Judge Chase — Retires from Congress in 1807 — ^Elected Judge of the Superior Court vrithout opposition — Dignity and Force of his Judicial Administration In 1813 is elected Governor — Firmness in the War — Sagacity of his Measures — Alleviation Law — Veto-Message — ^Defeated for Governor in 1815 — Betires to his Farm in Greene County — Serves in the State Senate — Domestic Eelations — His Death in 1822 — Letters to Gen. Blackshear referred to, &c a 345 APPENDIX. Gen. David Blacksheae — ^Ancestors from Germany — Came to America in 1732 — Settle on Trept Eiver in North Carolina — Hardships of Forest Life— Toil rewarded by Success — ^David Blackshear bora in 1764^Goes to School three Months— Follows his Brothers in the War of the Eevolution — Present at the Battle of Moore's Creek in 1776 — Also at Bnford's Bridge —His Eldest Brother, James Blackshear, killed by the Tories— Sudden Revenge — Goes three Months more to School — Education completed in six Months— Learns Surveying— Winter Expeditions to Georgia as a Surveyor— Works on the Farm — Eemoves to Georgia in 1790— Names of Brothers and Sisters — Appointed Justice of the Peace in 1796— Major of CONTBNTS. . Battalion — Orders in 1797 with prospect of war with France — ^Indian Troubles — Letter of Govemor Jackson in 1799 — Exercises Military and Civil Power — ^Appointed Major of Brigade — ^Marriage with Fanny Hamil- ton in 1802 — Family Connection — District Surveyors in 1806 between Oconee and Ocmnlgee — Yazoo Fraud denounced by the Legislature in 1807— Appointed Brigadier-General in 1812— Ordered to protect the Fron- tier — Erection of Forta near the Ocmnlgee — Detail of MUilda — Active Operations — Command of the Army tendered by Gov. Early — Orders to Subordinates — Expedition to Flint Kvot — ^Letters from Major-General Mcintosh — ^Rumor of large British Force at Forbes's Store — CoL Haw- kins's Indian Ke^ment — Movements of Gen. Jackson near New Orleans — Geor^ Detachment ordered to Mobile— Marching and Counter- marching — ^Landing of the British near Darien — Ordered to the Sea- coast — Letters to Gen. Floyd — Scarcity of Supplies — March down the Ocmnlgee — Panic south of the Altamahii — High Waters on Route — Arrives at Fort Barrington — Becmits the Army — ^Takes possession of Darien — Orders to prevent Pillage by the Enemy — ^British Fleet near St. Mary's — Fort and Magazine at Point Petre destroyed — ^Negroes enticed by the British — ^Admiral Cockbnm — News of the Victory at New Orleans — ^Intelligence of Peace from the Secretary of War — Cessation of Hostilities — ^Demonstration of Joy in Savannah — ^Troops disbanded, February 27, 1815 — Militain Correspondence — Gen. Blackshear returns to his Farm — Thanks voted by the Legislature — Oconee Navigation — Public Spirit — Service in the Legislature — Chairman of Committee on the State of the Republic — ^Influence — Withdraws from Public Life in 1825 — Besignation as Brigadier-General — Letter from Govemor Troup — Conduct of Jndge Fort investigated by the Legislature — Social Correspondence — Letters from Members of Congress, Dr. Moses Waddel, &c. &c.— Presi- dential Elector — Family Record — His Death, July 4, 1837 — Charac- ter, &c INDEX To the Documents and Correspondence attached to the Memoir of General Black- SHEAB. [Where several Despatches or Letters appear between the same parties, only one of tiiem is referred to in the Index.] OTFICIAI PAPBBS. PA0E Adams, Major-General — Orders for Frontier Service 414 Barnard, Timothy — ^Transmission of Despatches **° Blackshear, Lt. Col.— Wsorders in Militia. 413 Calhoun, Secretary of War— Claims for Military Service 467 Carter, Army-Contractor — Escort for Supplies 423 Early, Govemor — Tendering Command of the Army 415 Fannin, Quartermaster — Deposit of Rations 4o2 Fauche, Adjutant-General— Prospect of War, 1797 403 Floyd, Brigadier-General— Defence of the Islands 460 Freeman, Secretary of Executive Department— Army Intelligence 408 Groce, Captain— Organizing First-Class Militia 430 Hawkins, Colonel— Message to Indian Chiefe 444 Hopkins, Major— Disposing of Command after Peace 463 Irwin, Governor- Indian Troubles on the Oconee 414 355 10 CONTENTS. PACE Jackson, Governor — Indian Trespasses and Remedy 405 Lamar, Secretary of Executive Department — Eeoeiving Gen. La Fayette 480 Lane, Captain — Ordnance Stores to be supplied. 450 Massias, Captain— News of Victory at New Orleans 458 McDonald, Forage-Master— Loss of Public Stores at Ferry 434 Mcintosh, Major-General — Ordering Detachment to Mobile 440 Mitchell, Governor — Examination of the Frontier 412 Monroe, Secretary of War — Announcing Peace with Great Britain 463 Navey, Forage-Master— Supplies for the Army 434 Newnan, Adjutant-General — Regiments for Gen. Jackson 422 Patten, Major— Organizing Militia in Twiggs 433 Pinckney, Major-General— Muster of Troops in U. S. Service 461 Porter, Secretary of Executive Department — Ammunition for the Army 454 Rabun, Governor — Court-Martial in Laurens 467 Rutherford, Colonel — Regimental Reviews in 1799 405 Thomas, Captain — Swords and Pistols for Cavalry. 433 Tooke, Lt. Colonel — Indian Attack on Hartford 420 Wimberly, Lt. Colonel — ^Arming the Forts in Twiggs 412 Winchester, Brigadier-General — Reinforcements for New Orleans 439 PEIVATE lETTEBS. Blackshear, James H. — Student at Franklin CoUeg#. 468 Blount, Richard A. — Oconee Navigation 481 Chandler, Daniel — Soliciting Influence in Legislature 483 Crawford, Joel — ^Public Offioersat Washington 467 Crawford, Peter — ^Depraved Party Movements 482 Elliott, John — ^Presidential Campaign in 1824 472 Floyd, John — ^Public Rejoicing at News of Peace 463 Franklin, Bedney — Introducing Dr. Abner Franklin 426 Hammond, Samuel — Militia Claims in Congress 411 Hardin, Mark — ^Army Gossip, European Affairs, &c 424 Harris, Charles — Candidate for City Court of Savannah 480 Jones, James — ^Western Territory in 1800 409 Jones, Seaborn — Lawsuit of Ridley vt. Blackshear. 476 King, Henry — Relief before Legislature 480 Mcintosh, John Houstoun — British Outrages on the Coast 465 Parke, Ezekiel — Introducing Dr. William W. Strain 421 Perry, James — Introducing Member of the Legislature 481 Sawyer, John — British plundering Private Property 455 Strong, Christopher B.— Troup Victory in 1825 480 Tattnall, Edward F. — Introducing Col. Daniell. 469 Waddel, Moses (Rev.)— Affairs of Franklin College 475 Wilde, Richard H.— Cabinet Officers and Prospects in 1825 479 PREFACE. This work in its present arrangement differs from the plan first intended. When the author made np his mind to pub- lish sketches of the Bench and Bar of Georgia, he persuaded himself that his inquiries would draw forth many things — enough to constitute a volume — ^which he would have only to place under suitable heads, with such remarks of his own as might be necessary to preserve the connection. It was designed more as a compilation of facts than a treatise on character. The idea was to separate the incidents into a class, with distinct chapters, leaving the matter which was purely biographical to appear under the names introduced. The author aimed to devolve the composition chiefly on others who were adequate, — to place them as laborers in the field, whilst he would follow and gather up the sheaves with humble acknowledgment. But those whom he invited to the harvest had many excuses. Some were silent ; others feigned inability to write; some had no leisure from other engage- ments ; a portion had forgotten all the good things they ever knew, but were kind enough to refer to certain other gentle- men, who would gladly relieve their overburdened memories for the accommodation of the author. A few sat down at once and gave him a crumb to stop his importunity. And here the author takes occasion to thank his correspondents, to whom he is indebted for his best materials. References in the margin will guide the reader to the sources of his information. The author begs to say that his search has been liberally rewarded, as the work itself will show. Old family chests 11 12 PREFACE. and drawers have been opened to Hm, with the privilege to examine and select papers. The aid from this quarter has been most gratifying. Many letters and documents, too valu- able to perish, have been thus given to the public. They will be found in their proper connection in the work. To claim for them the privacy in which many of the letters were written only adds to their interest. Of course, names have been with- held in certain passages where the freedom would give pain to the living. A picture drawn in confidence is more to be relied upon for its truth, its fidelity to nature, than the coloring of the artist who paints for the public eye. A leading feature in this work is the frankness and simplicity of its statements, both by contributors and the individual who writes himself the author. On no occasion, however, has any unkindness been intended, either to the dead or the living, in the course of these memoirs, — as there may be candor without malice. It may seem out of place for the author to qualify his sketches of individual character, after the labor he has be- stowed on them. Knowing that many persons who were personally acquainted with the gentlemen of whom he has written will be apt to accuse the author of exaggeration on the one hand and perhaps injustice on the other, as his remarks may happen in each case, he here takes occasion to disclose a secret in book-making by way of explanation. Most writers, in all periods of the world, in all countries, — ^from the huge metropolis to the veriest hamlet, — ^have been influenced by a common ambition to appear well on paper, as that is the only arena on which they are to figure with any hope of suc- cess. To give their labors a sort of attraction, they are com- pelled to invest every thing they touch with more than ordinary importance, — to give warmth and force, so as to render signifi- cant that which seems devoid of interest because it is familiar in every-day life. The author, however, insists that he has not exceeded, if indeed he has fulfilled, the usual license in this respect. Of the thirty-two characters noticed biographi- cally in his work, he has seen twenty-three of them, heard PREFACE. 13 tbem converse or make speeches, or in some other mode had an opportunity of judging each individual on his own merits. With several of them he was personally intimate, as the facts in the memoirs will show. At the time, no very striking idea or occurrence was presented worthy of historical note. But on review, after the grave has improved the vision and the heart of survivors, generosity supplants even a fault-finding disposition. The author has made these remarks, not that he prides himself on their boldness or originality, but from a much better motive. While he charges this habit of writers without fear of successful contradiction in the mind of any experienced reader of history, he asserts, in behalf of the statesmen, jurists, and advocates whom he has chronicled, a perfect claim to the distinction and credit severally awarded to them. In the mean time, the author has too humble an opinion of himself to appear in any other light than as a mere pioneer in the soli- tudes of forensic biography in Georgia. He has pointed to the buried treasures, the correspondence, the briefs, the career of many who acted well their part and whose memoirs would be a gain to the public. In this connection the author may be permitted to express his gratification that he has accom- plished enough, under singular disadvantages, to stimulate others better qualified to rescue from decay the materials of which the legal profession furnishes an ample store to interest the whole community. In the variety of matter incorporated in these volumes the author has thought proper to admit several letters written in the confidence of friendship, some of them entirely too kind for publication by himself. While this may be so, he is even willing to bear the reproach for the sake of other days and other associations now pleasant to recall. A number of origi- nal letters will be found, however, wholly free from this objec- tion, addressed to other persons, all germain to the subject. And here let the fact be proclaimed that general history is made up of transactions not less sudden and casual than those of individuals which constitute their chapter in the world. 14 PREFACE. This current of life, more or less feeble in the experience of every man, gathers up particles from a thousand rills, and, after cleansing the gold from the rubbish, leaves the deposit for distribution among his fellows, — the dividend often being so minute in value as to require a microscope to perceive it. Not so with the characters in' this work. Perhaps not one of them lived for history, — not one of them felt convinced that he deserved commemoration. Some of the gentlemen, it is true, ranked among the foremost in the Union for public ser- vices and personal merit: nevertheless they had to enjoy their honors with trembling, and to take only an equal chance in the struggles of humanity. They are the more entitled to respect than if they had with premeditation acted a part for the historian. It is a grateful labor to follow the career of a decided, earnest man, — one who accomplished great and worthy deeds, or who failed only because his power was not equal to.his ambition or his modesty. The author has endea^ vored to do justice to all, and has not omitted to dwell on defects or to discriminate between opposite qualities in the same individual. He has written in a spirit of kindness at all times in the preparation of this work, and for this he takes no credit to himself, just as, if he had acted otherwise toward the defenceless, he would deserve the scorn of his fellow-men, as he would certainly incur his own. The political matter introduced, referring to several noted issues in Georgia, will no doubt prove acceptable, not only to the young men who have grown up since, but even to those who shared in the contests as they arose. The Old and New Treaties are noticed in sufficient detail to give a just under- standing of the controversy. The case of the missionaries and other parties who sought to arraign Georgia before the Supreme Court of the United States is touched upon, with a statement of the facts and the legal questions. In regard to Nullification, and the proceedings in Georgia and South Caro- lina to carry the doctrine into efi'ect, a very copious outline has been given. These topics form a legitimate portion of the memoirs. The Georgia platform of 1850, and the Resolu- PBBFACB. 15 tions of the Nashville Convention, are also included. In addi- tion to these, several measures in Congress have been brought into view. The recharter of the Bank of the United States, the removal of the public deposits, the tariff uniform system of bankruptcy, annexation of Texas, &c. are interwoven in the biographical sketches. From the papers of the late Gen. Blackshear much inte- resting matter has been obtained, throwing light upon the negotiations for the western territory ceded by Georgia to the General Government in 1802, and also in relation to the War of 1812-15. Many of the letters having been written by Governor Early, whose memoir appears, they were considered necessary to shoijy his official conduct at a critical period. The other documents and correspondence, it is believed, will prove not less acceptable to the public. They all establish the value of old family papers; and their publication, it is hoped, will induce more carefulness generally in preserving such memorials of the past. Many rich treasures have been lost to history for the want of due reflection in this respect. Humble as they seem in garrets usually allotted to them, these scraps of writing are the best interpreters of the times to which they relate, and more worthy of confidence than the interested and formal statements made for the public eye to serve a party or a cause. For this reason, the privilege granted the author by the family of Gen. Blackshear has led to a memoir which accompanies the papera in the appendix to the first volume, and which will be found of interest to the profes- sion for the legislative and judicial matter it contains. In submitting the result of his labors to the public, the author asks permission to say a word or two calling for the sympathy of his professional brethren. Many original pafiers in the handwriting of deceased members of the bar have passed under his inspection for the purposes of biography. They have always impressed him with sadness and delicacy in the work he had undertaken, because, while they furnished evidence of character, they left him to throw around that cha- racter such drapery as might render it attractive or disagree- 16 PKEFACE. able. It has afforded him satisfaction to exhibit qualities for approval, without the least pleasure in alluding to defects when they existed. In performing his task he has only to regret that his abilities have been less than his patience in the composition of these memoirs. In the appendix to the second volume a court-roll has been given, containing the names of all the judges of the Superior Courts, and the Attorney and Solicitor Generals in Georgia from 1790 to 1857. Nothing of the kind has ever before been published. It is a record of honors bestowed, and cannot fail to interest readers generally. Also in the same appendix will be found "fragments" froni the pen of the author, most of which have appeared in print at various times. They are intended to show certain matters as they transpired. The pieces entitled "Labor Essential to Happiness," and "Letters to a Young Friend," are particularly intended to foster energy of character, and may, it is hoped, have a salutary effect. In addition to what the author has already said about varying the plan of this work from that originally announced, he thinks proper to observe that the EoU of Practising Attor- neys in Georgia, which he designed to include, has been omitted for the reason that such information has since become fomiliar to the public. All the materials furnished the author for the purpose have been worked up in the biographies which appear in the two volumes now submitted to the public. Should the favor with which they are received authorize a third volume, the field is ample enough and abundantly fruitful to render a compliance with such a demand not less a duty than a pleasure. S. F. M. OoLEiHOEFE, Geoboia, January, 1858. THE BENCH MD BAE OF GEORGIA. GEORGE D. ANDERSON. There is no doubt, had he lived to the usual limit of man's Bojourn upon earth, the Hon. George David Anderson would have occupied a high rank among the distinguished men of Georgia. His parents were John and Nancy Anderson, who resided in Anderson district, South Carolina, where their son (the third of eleven children) was born on the 28th day of May, 1806. His opportunities for an education were quite limited ; yet, by great diligence in the pursuit of knowledge as chance permitted, he became well informed and capable of mastering the intricacies of the law. Removing in early life with his parents to De Kalb county, Georgia, he continued to exercise his habits of manual labor for a number of years. He then turned his attention to legal studies, and read in the office of David Kiddoo and James M. Calhoun, Esqs., then partners in the practice of law at Decatur, until he was admitted to the bar in 1833. In the next four or five years he was connected with Mr. Calhoun in the usual labors and profits of the profession until his removal to Marietta, about the year 1838. At different periods Mr. Anderson served the public in the following situations : — 1. Receiver of tax-returns and collector of taxes. 2. Captain of a militiarcompany. 3. Colonel of a regiment of militia. 4. Brigade-inspector. 5. Commissioner appointed by President Van Buren, in 1836, to investigate alleged frauds on the Indians, with respect to their lands in Alabama. Vol. L— 2 ir 18 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. 6. Representative five years from De Kalb county in the Legis- lature of Georgia. 7. Senator from the county of Cobb. 8. Solicitor-General of the Coweta circuit. 9. Judge of the Superior Court. This is indeed a flattering record, such as can rarely be exhibited in favor of a man who died at the age of thirty-seven years. A gentleman* to whom the author applied politely furnished a copy of the remarks of the press and the proceedings of the bar on the occasion of the death of Judge Anderson, which are adopted as a part of this memoir. The same gentleman adds : — Judge Anderson was a man of a lively disposition, and possessed a warm and feeling heart. He was quite distinguished for his kindness and attention to the sick and unfortunate. In point of honesty and fidelity not a blemish was on his character. You may form some idea of the estimation the people had of him, who knew him, from the great respect shown at his death. He was a member of the Presbyterian Church. The Federal Union thus referred to Judge Andekson's death : — Georgia has lost few sons whose untimely end would have produced more regret than him for whom we perform the painful duty of offering this passing notice. We extract the remarks of the Rome Sentinel, and the proceedings of the bar at Spring Place, where his death occurred. But the case is so full of interest that we add the following, taken princi- pally from a letter from one of his friends : — " On the morning of his decease, Judge Anderson arose as usual and opened his door that a servant might light a fire. He was for half an hour left alone, but at that time he was found expiring on the floor. His attentive friend, who describes the scene, was present : ' His pulse had ceased to beat and he was perfectly insensible. It was an awful and sudden visitation of Providence, cutting him off in the midst of his use- fulness and at the post of duty. His ways are ofttimes dark and myste- rious, but always right. Judge Anderson seemed to have died without the slightest struggle. His features were as placid and composed as if he had gently fallen asleep.' From Spring Place the body was transported to Jttarietta, to receive the last duties of his bereaved wife and little ones, and his numerous friends. 'I never have,' said his friend, 'seen a more deeply solemn scene. The Court, the Bar, the Grand Jury, and the largest procession of citizens I ever witnessed on such an occasion, attended his funeral services.' This well-merited tribute of respect was rendered practicable by the accidental sitting of the Cobb Court at that time. " Thus has fallen one of our purest, most acceptable, and upright citizens. His rise to office was not through detraction and malice, but his claims rested on his merit alone. Few have arrived at such honors with as few blemishes." A communication written by a gentlemanf well known in Georgia appeared in the Rome Sentinel as follows : — * James M. Calhoun, Esq., a State Senator. f Hon. John H. Lumpkin, a Representative in Congress. GEORGE D. ANDERSON. 19 It becomes our melancholy duty as a pnblic journalist to record the death of the Hon. George D. Anderson, Judge of the Superior Courts of the Cherokee circuit. Below will be found the proceedings of a meet- ing held by the bar of this circuit at Spring Place, in Murray county, on the day of his death. The public generally throughout this whole country will participate in the sentiments of regret expressed by the bar at this mysterious visitation of Providence. Judge Anderson was a native of Anderson district. South Carolina. He removed to this State at an early age, where he commenced life under many disadvantages. Without wealth, without influential family connec- tions to aid and assist in bringing him forward into life, he commenced earning his support by laboring as a mechanic in manufacturing cotton- gins. But, his native intellect being active and strong, he could not long be confined to mechanical employments. He thirsted for knowledge and that enviable distinction which it only can give, aided and assisted by a manly, virtuous life. Without any education, and while compelled to attend to the duties and labors of a mechanical trade, he commenced the study of law. We think we see him now, as then, after being worn out by toil and labor during the day, at night seizing his candle and book, where the flickering light might be seen through his window, the sole sentinel at that dread hour of all that was once life and animation. By his application and industry, continued under such disadvantages, he became qualified from his knowledge to commence the practice of that profession. He established himself in the practice at Decatur, De Kalb county, Georgia, and not only sustained himself as a lawyer, but received from the community in which he lived repeated testimonials of their confi- dence and esteem by being selected as their representative in the State Legislature. In the councils of his adopted State he was always the eloquent, the fearless, and independent advocate of her rights, her honor, and the best interests of his own constituents. But his march to distinction was onward and upward. He was next elected by the Legislature the Solicitor-General of the Coweta circuit; and all who have witnessed his able, manly, and eloquent appeals in behalf of the State of Georgia and her violated laws, in criminal prosecutions, have awarded him the praise of an able, honest, and faithful public officer. After the expiration of his office as solicitor-general, shortly after the Cherokee counties were organized by the Legislature and settled by its present enterprising popu- lation, the subject of this brief notice made a permanent location in the county of Cobb; and here he was honored with the confidence of the people, and loved for his social, intellectual, and moral worth. Without effort, intrigue, or management, he was to the day of his death an almost universal favorite, and, in the year 1841, was chosen by his constituency in Cobb to represent them in the senatorial branch of the Legislature. He was next elected, at the last session of the Legislature of this State, Judge of the Superior Court of the Cherokee district, and was ably, honestly, and faithftilly discharging its responsible duties at the time of his death, with entire satisfaction to the whole coimtry. Judge Anderson was just entering his thirty-seventh year at the time of his death; and he had, without wealth, without influential family friends, and without the advantages of an early education, established for himself a fame and a reputation that any among us might be proud of. Indeed, it is an example that may be adduced through all time to the 20 BENCH AND BAK OF GEORGIA. youth of the countrj as well worthy their imitation. It also strikingly illustrates the character of our free and happy system of government. The proceedings of the bar were as follows : — At a meeting of the members of the bar of the Cherokee circuit, con- vened in the court-house at Spring Place on Tuesday morning, the 28th of March, 1843, Judge John W. Hooper was called to the chair, and Thomas C. Hackett, Esq., requested to act as secretary. The chairman announced in a brief and feeling manner the sudden and unexpected death of the Hon. GrEORaE D. Anderson, Judge of the Superior Courts of the Cherokee circuit, who, by a sudden dispensation of Providence, departed this life at an early hour this morning, at his lodgings in this place. Judge Turner H. Trippe, after a few brief remarks, offered the follow- ing preamble and resolutions, which were unanimously adopted by the meeting : — It has pleased an all-wise and overruling Providence to remove from among us the Judge of the Superior Courts of the Cherokee circuit of this State. The Hon. Greorge D. Anderson is no more ! Without warn- ing, the fell Destroyer came and cut him down in the midst of his useful- ness and at the post of duty. To those who knew him as we have known him, eulogy of his character is unnecessary and vain. Mild and courteous as a gentleman, able and talented as a lawyer, upright, fearless, and independent as a judge, he bade fair to become — indeed, he had become — an ornament to the profes- sion, a credit to the bench, and one of Georgia's best and brightest sons. Society, and especially his circuit, has sustained a heavy loss by his untimely death. To his family the deplorable loss is irretrievable. In all the relations of husband, father, and friend, he was as faultless as mor- tality could be. Entertaining these opinions of the worth of the departed Judge Anderson, we, the members of the bar of the Cherokee circuit, as a tribute of respect to his memory and in admiration of his character, give the public expression of our feelings on this mournful occasion. Therefore, Resolved, That we deeply deplore the loss we have sustained by the sudden and untimely death of Judge Anderson. Resolved, That we sincerely sympathize with his afflicted family in their bereavement. Resolved, That as a slight tribute to his memory, and indeed a small token of the grief we feel on this melancholy occasion, we will wear crape on our left arm for thirty days. Resolved, That a committee be appointed to offer to his wife and family our sincere condolence in their deep affliction, and a copy of the proceed- ings of this meeting. Resolved, That a copy of these proceedings be published in the public gazette of this circuit and the principal newspapers in the State. Milton H. Gathright moved that at the next term of the Superior Court of this county, a motion be niade that the proceedings of this meet- ing be entered on the minutes of the court. The chair appointed Turner H. Trippe, James A. Hanks, Kichard M. Aycock, Andrew J. Hansell, and Milton H. Gathright, Esqs., the com- mittee contemplated by the resolution. The meeting then, on motion of Warren Akin, Esq., adjourned. II. ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. The genius of Robert Augustus Bball has been admitted by all who ever heard him speak. He has been aptly called the Prentiss of Georgia. His career at the bar was distinguished by a glowing eloquence which defied all competition. A native grace of manner captivated every eye ; his pure diction delighted the scholar; and the melody of his voice charmed every listener. We shall give such particulars of his history as we have been able to gather. He was born in Prince George county, State of Maryland, on the 16th day of November, in the year 1800. His father removed to Georgia in 1808 with his family; and the subject of this memoir, after the usual elementary training in neighborhood schools, was sent to Raleigh, Noith Carolina, where he completed his education. He subsequently studied law in Augusta under the direction of Judges ]Montgomery and Reid, was admitted to the bar Boon after he was twenty-one years of age, and located in Marion, Twiggs county, where he formed a professional partnership with Col. T. G. Holt. On the promotion of the latter gentleman to the Judgeship of the Superior Court by Gov. Troup, in December, 1824, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of the Hon. Thomas W. Harris, Maj. Beall succeeded Col. Holt as Solicitor- General of the Southern circuit by executive appointment. About this time, owing to some remarks at the dinner-table of a friend, (the late Martin Hardin, Esq., of Decatur county,) a quar- rel ensued between Thomas D. Jlitchell, Esq., and Maj. Beall, which led to the field of honor on the Carolina side, near Augusta, in March, 1825. Two shots were exchanged by the parties, when, on the mediation of Maj. Pace, who was recognised as authority in such affairs, the combatants retired from the field without further hostilities. Capt. Joseph Morgan was the officiating friend, and Dr. Ambrose Baber the surgeon, of Maj. Beall. The author, then quite a youth, well remembers the warm rejoicing of Maj. Beall's friends on his return in safety from the duel. While many regretted tliat he had taken a step of such doubtful propriety, all regarded 21 22 BENCH AND BAK OF GEORGIA. him with increased admiration. He was put forth as a candidate for the House of Representatives by the Troup party, but was defeated by a small majority at the regular election. On ascer- taining that the Clai-k party had full dominion in the Legislature, Col. Moses Fort resigned his seat in the House in order to compete for the bench. Maj. Beall was a candidate to fill the vacancy, and was elected over Robert Glenn, Esq., the ablest member of 'the Clark party in Twiggs county. Thus we find Maj. Beall, at the age of twenty-five years, a prominent member of the Legislature of Georgia, commanding the attention of the House by strains of eloquence which drew crowded galleries. His modesty and self-respect prevented him from appearing often upon the floor. When a question Avorthy of his talents arose, and he believed that he could shed light upon it, he exerted himself with that preparation and energy which always secured triumph, if not in the votes of the House, at least in his own rapidly-advancing character. He was courteous in debate, and extremely affable in his bearing at all times. His course during the session proved so acceptable to his con- stituents that he was re-elected the next fall by a large majority. His devoted friend, Major-General Ezekiel Wimberly, to whose staff he belonged, was returned to the Senate at the same election, over Gen. L. L. Griffin, who, in the heated party-canvass between Troup and Clark, had caused their defeat the previous year. Maj. Beall again sustained himself with increasing reputation in the House of Representatives. At the session of 1827, Maj. Beall appeared at the bar of the House of Representatives as counsel for Judge Fort, on charges preferred by Col. Joseph Blackshear, of Laurens county, for irre- gularities in office, and especially for decisions which he had made in the case of A. B. Ridley and wife against the executor of Elijah Blackshear, deceased. After hearing testimony, the select com- mittee reported an address to the governor, which, after passing the House of Representatives, failed for the want of a two-thirds vote in the Senate. Pleased with the opening before him in political life, Maj. Beall gave more attention to the voters of his county than he did to the practice of the law. On questions purely legal, his briefs, though more than respectable, did not do justice to his abilities. Labor was irksome as a habit, and he trusted too much to off-hand inspi- ration to cope with such veterans as Shorter, Torrance, Lamar, S. Rockwell, Prince, Strong, and others of the like class, who often ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 23 measured strength with him. Before the jury Maj. Beall was in his proper element. He was well acquainted with the human heart, and could touch every passion with the skill of a master. He was self-possessed and dignified in manner, with a vein of satire that scorched, and the faculty of condensation which gave order and force to his arguments. As his mind glowed with the intensity of its own action, some of the most brilliant gems dropped from his lips. His temperament was poetic. The dark, flashing eye, the clear, cultivated voice, rolling its rich cadences upon the ear, the excited passion and daring flight, constituted Maj. Beall, at times, one of the happiest forensic orators. His moods were not always equal. Genius is ever erratic, — sometimes in gloomy abstraction and then elated with its own divinity. The fortunate medium is difficult to attain. The two extremes were signally illustrated in the character of JIaj. Beall. His mental and social organization required constant aliment. Hence he was fond of society where he could draw out congenial sentiments and impart his own lofty nature in the contact. The result was that he formed irregular habits from which he suffered both in fortune and in health. He became addicted to games of hazard, just as Sheridan and Fox applied themselves to keep their ardent sensibilities from languish- ing in the intervals between labor and repose. To show the kindness of heart which Maj. Beall possessed, the author makes free to introduce a letter from him, called forth by an application for advice in a course of legal studies : — Makton, Sept. 21, 1826. Mt dear Sir : — ^I neglected to call at the post-office until yesterday, consequently did not receive your acceptable favor of the 18th inst. before that time, to which circumstance I beg yon to attribute my delay in answering it. I am gratified to nnderstand that you intend to devote your leisure hours, assiduously, to the study of law.— not more for the benefit it will be to yourself than the credit, I readily hope and believe, you may be to the profession. I heartily wish you prosperity and cheerfully tender you my assistance to facilitat* your progress in the undertaking. The acquisition of a " practical knowledge of jurisprudence" in this State is not a very laborious undertaking. It may be acquired by assidu- ous application iu twelve months, and some have qualified themselves for the practice in a shorter period. The course of study to be pursued previous to admission, however, is now laid down by our uniform Rules of Couit. Accordingly, all appli- cants for admission are examined on the principles of the Common and Statute Laws of England in force in this State; the general principles of Equity; the Constitution of the United States and the State of Georgia; the Statute Laws of this State and the Rules of Court. To acquire a competent knowledge of the Common Law of England, 1 24 BENCH AND BAK OF GEORGIA. 1-ocommend you to read tbe Commentaries of Justice Blackstone. There is now a work in press, compiled in conformity with a resolution of our 'Legislature, embracing all the statutes of England in force in this State. author most used is "Maddock's Chancery." tearful, however, it may not he found in any library here, I would next prefer " Harrison" on the same title. . , ■, e You will make use of "Prince's Digest" in acquiring a knowledge ot the statutes of our own State. . . This course of study, however, will only qualify you for admission to the bar, without giving you the title of a profound lawyer. As I have told you how you may get the name of a lawyer, I now refer you to the little volume* I loaned you a few days since, which teaches you how you may become one in truth, and a great one. Cordially reciprocating your sentiments of esteem and friendship, I am, &c., RoBT. Augustus Beall. Mr. Stephen F. Miller. N.B.— Do not hesitate to call for any book in our office, and believe every thing I have at your service. Beall. The author asks the privilege of recording his own grateful recollections of this timely response to his timid request. With more presumption than judgment, the author, dropping his humbler though safer employments, cast an anxious look at the bar and solaced himself with hopes which his poor abilities never per- mitted him to realize. Still, the retrospect has a mournful plea- sure, even to this very letter. Then, Maj. Beall was a rising star of the first magnitude, popular with the masses and peculiarly fas- cinating in conversation, winning all hearts and extorting universal praise. It was gratifying to the author, then in his twenty-first year, to receive the friendly notice of such a man. Now, after the lapse of thirty years since the letter was written, it is the lot of the humble youth to whom it was addressed to rescue the memory of his warm-hearted friend from the mold of time and to pass it to a new generation. Previous to his marriage, Maj. Beall was much from home on visits to his parents in Warren county and in attending courts at a distance to which he was called, especially for the defence of per- sons accused of high criminal oifences. This was his forte. His pictures of distress, his withering anathemas of oppression, his per- suasive manner and melting eloquence, seldom left the jury at, a loss. Their sympathies and reason generally united in acquitting his client. Besides the courts of his own county, he attended some half- * Rathby's Letters to a Law Student, dedicated to Lord Loughborough. ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 25 dozen, not, ho^rever, with that punctuality and relish for business so essential to the building up of a successful practice. In fact, he could never submit long at a time to the drudgery of his profes- sion. His clients often called at his office without an interview, and when they even had the good fortune to see him he would put them off until the last hour and then wholly neglect their business or despatch it hastily, perhaps imperfectly. In this way his p;ipers became confused. He had no regular place for any thing,- — kept no private dockets showing the condition of his business. Interro- gatories, notice to produce papers, the ordering of witnesses, and all that sort of preparation necessary in a cause, was too frequently omitted. In term, when the call of the docket roused his atten- tion, he usually had some excuse to offer, Avhich was urged with so much innocence and plausibility that the court indulged him from day tb day and often granted him continuances. But, when forced to trial, whether all his testimony was at hand or not, the spirit of the case took full possession of him. From his zeal and readiness • a casual observer would be apt to conclude that the dexterous advocate had applied himself with signal industry to office investi- gation. At this point of his career, Maj. Beall offered an equal partner- ship to the author, which he gladly accepted. This was in No- vember, 1828. Maj. Beall was then recently married, and had just returned from Milledgeville, where he had been defeated for the office of brigadier-general in an election to fill the vacancy Caused by the resignation of Gen; Thaddeus G. Holt, who at that session had been restored to the bench from which he had been swept by the political tornado of 1825, so fatal to Troup office- holders, by legislative action. His successful competitor was Gen. Eli Warren, then a Representative from Laurens county, but now a citizen of Houston. He was of opinion that injustice had been done to his claims by the Legislature ; for he had a military taste, was well versed in the discipline, and made an admirable figure on horseback at reviews. Indeed, he was as graceful in the saddle as he was elegant in the drawing-room. A clumsy motion or an undignified attitude was never perceived by the author during his ten years' close intimacy with Maj. Beall. He was a splendid reader. Passages from Shakspeare and other dramatic authors were given with all the conception and spirit of the finest trage- dians. Ho was a great admirer of Cooper ; and imitating no one, but following his own genius, he was the equal of Forrest and Macready in strong delineation of character, combining the 26 BENCH AND BAR OP GEOKGIA. inspired energy of Kean, without the stage auxiliaries of either of them. Well does the author recollect Maj. Beall's reading to a group of friends the celebrated debate between Hayne and Webster, on Foote's resolution in the Senate of the United States, as it came fresh from the reporters in 1830. He belonged to the Carolina school of politics ; and as the champion Hayne flashed his trusty sword under the State-Rights banner, Maj. B. dwelt with special unction on passages which amounted, as he thought, to demonstra- tion of the doctrine. Then came the majestic roll of Webster's drum. After days of dark weather at sea, a glimpse of the sun was taken and the latitude of the question ascertained. Webster uttered thoughts which electrified the world. Ancient or modern times never furnished the parallel of his speech on that occasion. His dying gaze on the flag of the Union was indeed sublime. The voice, the eye, the excited feelings of Maj. Beall, as he progressed in the reading, and the delight of the listeners, are fresh in the author's memory. The gifted statesmen whose words he repeated in a style of surpassing beauty are now in the grave, and so is the brilliant reader. Let no person start at the association of names, Beall, Hayne, Webster ; for in this order they left the world, at the ages of thirty-six, forty-eight, and seventy years, re- spectively. In depth of sensibility and exalted passion, constituting the soul of genius, Robert Augustus Beall never, perhaps, had a superior, except in Lord Byron. This opinion may, by some, be termed extravagant ; still, the author is candid in its avowal. He had full opportunities of analyzing his character in all the phases of fortune and temperament. A high order of genius, other qualities not being equal, is apt to render the possessor unhappy. Sheridan and Byron are noted examples : both singularly imprudent in the com- mon affairs of life, and both died under a cloud, — one in adversity and the other in self-imposed exile, to escape from the horrors of his own mind. To this class of mortals, more to be pitied than condemned, we assign the subject of this memoir. If we exceed justice to the dead, the error at least has no sting. But to resume our narrative. — In 1830, Gov. Gilmer appointed Maj. Beall one of his aides-de-camp, with the rank of lieutenant- colonel. He continued to appear with Maj. Gen. Wimberly at regi- mental reviews in the division, but in his new capacity as represen- tative of the commander-in-chief. In January, 1832, Col. Beall removed with his family to the city of Macon, and opened a law- ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 27 office in connection with Col. Seymour, now of New Orleans. To discuss more prominently the political questions of the day, in which he felt a warm interest, Col. Beall purchased a share in the Georgia Messenger, — Mr. S. Rose then, as now, and for the last thirty years, still retaining his position as publisher. Acting as principal editor, he espoused nullification with earnestness and ability, sounding the alarm and pointing to the authorized redress of the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions of 1798, — that inexhaust- ible fountain of vague construction which has perplexed so many honest inquirers after political truth. In the mean time the mili- tary aspirations of Col. Beall were gratified by the Legislature in electing him a brigadier-general. The extent of his practice at the bar was perhaps equal to his desire ; for he delighted mainly in politics, and his ample fortune exempted him from the necessity of labor. A vacancy in Congress having to be filled, the State-Rights party nominated Gen. Beall, and the Union party brought forward Gen. Glascock as his competitor. The vot« was then by general ticket and the canvass was warmly conducted, the Union candi- date prevailing by a small majority. Gen. Beall received frequent proofs of confidence from the people of Bibb county. Of the Anti-Tariff Convention in 1832, and the great State-Rights meet- ing, in 1833, at MUledgeville, (the night of the meteoric shower, 13th November,) he was an influential member and acted on the most important committees. As this was a noted meeting at the time, composed of many of the ablest men in Georgia, the author thinks proper to give some of the particulars. The Hon. Chris- topher B. Strong was appointed chairman, and the Hon. N. C. Satre and A. B. Loxgstreet acted as secretaries. On motion of Judge Clayton, it w^ Resolved, That a committee of thirteen be appointed by the chairman to propose resolutions expressing the sentiments of the State-Rights party in this State, and report to this meeting at its sitting. The committee consisted of the following gentlemen, in the order named by the chair : — Hon. A. S. Clayton, Hon. William H. Craw- ford, Dr. William C. Daniell, Col. Seaborn Jones, Hon. Richard W. Habersham, D. P. Hilhouse, Esq., Col. Samuel Rockwell, A. H. Chappell, Esq., Geo. H. Young, Esq., Gen. Robt. A. Beall, Col. Newton, Gen. Eli Warren, and Hon. Charles Dougherty. As a source of information to the younger politicians of the State, as well as to preserve the original Platform itself, the author copies from the official proceedings of the meeting : — 28 BEXCn AKD BAR OF GEORGIA. The committre retired; and, havinp; returned, reported through their chainnaii the folluwin;: preamble and resolufions : — The relations between the Federal and State Governments have assumed a peculiiir i:nd intense interest by reason of the events which terminated the ile'.lberatlons of the la.>t Congress. The long and angry contests which a-itated the whole South, and had produced just complaints against the General Government, were brought to a close with its la>t session; but they were succeeded (and doubtless for the special purpose of subserv- ing at some future period the very principle.^ they were compelled to abandon) by the enactment of a law equally objectionable and certainly more rlangerous to the liberties of the people than their former oppressions, and which, if permitted to endure, will ultimately perpetuate the u.sarpa- tions which it was professed to be renounced. It is not difficult to per- ceive that allusion is here made to the Proclamation of the President of the Uuited States, and the Force IJill, which was its legitimate conse- quence. The first document instantly revived the doctrines of the Fede- ralists of '98, which had been put down by Mr. Jefferson, at the head of the Republicans; and now, parties are forming everywhere, and particu- larly in our own State, for the avowe 1 pnrp ise of supporting the principles of the Proclamation ai;d Force Bill, thereby insidiously restoring to the Federal party the power which they lost under the elder Adams. To this end they have changed their name to one which is designed to play upon popular feeling; and, by the force of prejudice alone, they are aiming to re-establidh principles which the good sense of the people ab.solutely rejected in 1801, as tending to the destruction of the Union and rearing upon its ruins a consolidated government. These facts have justly alarmed the friends of liberty in every quarter: and those Republicans who still adhere to the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions, the great moral instru- ments by which 'Mr. Jefferson effected the overthrow of the Federalists, are rallying to the defence of the Constitution of the United States from North to South by counter-associations, designed to reorganize the old Republican party and to check immediately the growth of the doctrines of the Proclamation, which must inevitably lead to consolidation if not successfully resisted. The object of the present meeting is. First, to con- stitute and form one of those associations for the express purpose of coun- teracting the designs of the Federal party lately reorganized in this State, who, under false colors, are inculcating the doctrine of John Adams in '98, and those of Daniel Webster at the present time; and. Secondly, for the further object of enforcing a systematic opposition to the Proclamation and Force Bill. These last measures have aimed a deadly blow at State Rights, and seem now to require the united and concentrated energies of the friends and advocates of those rights to be directed to this point of attack, deemed so important by our enemies to be carried, and in which, if success should crown their exertions, all that is dear and valuable to freedom will be wrested from the States. That it may be distinctly understood what are the principles of this association, it will be necessary to show what are the doctrines of the Proclamation, and these are asserted in language which admits of no dispute. 1. It maintains that the States of which this Confederacy is composed never had a separate existence; for from the moment they ceased to be dependent on Great Britain, they formed one nation, and have so con- tinued. ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 29 2. That a State in the exercise of its legitimate powers has not the right to decide upon the constitutionality of an act of Congress, nnd to protect Ss citizens from the operation of an unconstitutional act, and to maintain within her limits the authority, rights, and liberties appertaining to a sovereign State. 3. That the States have no right to secede from the Union under any circumstances whatever, inasmuch as secession would destroy the unitt OF THE NATION. 4. That the people of the twenty-four States constitute one people. 5. That the members of Congress "are all representatives of the United States, not representatives of the particular States from which thcj/ come, and that they are not accountable to it for ant/ act done in the perform- ance of their legislative functions." 6. That "the States have not retained their entire sovereignty." 7. That the allegiance of our citizens is due to the United States " in the first instance," and not to their respective States. These are the doctrines of the Proclamation, and they have, at the special instance of the President, produced the Force Bill for their com- plete execution. This meeting doth solemnly protest against them, and as solemnly deny their legitimate deduction from the compact which established the Federal Government, and that the association now formed will resist them in every proper manner. To this end they Resolved, That the present meeting be organized into an association to be denominated " The State-Eights Party of Georgia," and recom- mend meetings in all the counties for the pui-pose of constituting similar associations, to be connected with that which will be formed at Milledge- ville, as the central association. Res'jlced, That the doctrines of the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions, as construed and understood by Mr. Jeflerson, and triumphantly acted upon in 1825, 6, and 7, in this State, constitute the creed of the State- Bights party of Georgia ; and that, as all such unconstitutional laws are null and void, we will, whenever the proper exigency arises, resist them in any manner the sovereign power of the State may order and direct. Resolved, That we consider the Force Bill as a glaring infraction of State rights and a gross outrage upon the liberties of the peopl:-, and that its continuance upon the statute-book is such an act of usurpation as ought not to be submitted to by free and independent States, and that we will use our exertions to counteract the principles of the Proclamation and to obtain a repeal of said bill. Resolved, That our Senators and Representatives in Congress be, and they are hereby, earnestly requested to demand an immediate repeal of the act of the last Congress, denominated the Force Bill, as being a pal- pable violation of the rights of the States, and the Federal Constitution. AVhich having been read, a motion was made to postpone further action that they might be printed and taken up at a subsequent meeting; which motion was, by a vote of the meeting, negatived ; and, on motion of Judge Clayton, it was Resolved, That the report be taken up and read by paragraphs. The report having been read, on motion of Judge Clayton, it was unanimously resolved that said preamble and resolutions be adopted and agreed to. On motion of Judge Dougherty, Resolved, That the editors of the States-£.ight papers in this State be 30 BEXCH AKD BAR OF GEORGIA. requested to publisli the foregoing preamble and resolutions, accompanied by the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions, and that a copy of the same be transmitted to each of our Senators and Representatives in Congress. On motion of Mr. Torrance, Resolveil, That the chairman of this meeting appoint a committee of thirteen, to be styled The Central Committee of the State-Eights Associa- tion of Georgia, to correspond with such associations in support of State Eights as have been, or may be, organized in the several counties of Georgia. The chairman appointed the following gentlemen : — Wm. H. Torrance, David B. Mitchell, Joel Crawford, John H. Howard, Randall Jones, Samuel Boykin, L. Q. C. Lamar, Seaton Grantland, Irby Hudson, Samuel Eockwell, N. C. Sayre, Dr. Wm. Greene, and John Williams, Esqs. On motion of Judge Clayton, Rexolved, That as a means of extending among the people an accurate knowledge of our principles, this meeting will patronize the paper called The Examiner, published by Condy Raguet, in the city of Philadelphia, and recommend to all the associations that may be formed in the several counties to do the same, and that those who may be disposed to subscribe for said paper apply to either of the secretaries of this meeting now or at a future period for that purpose. With the revolution of parties in Georgia since 1833 the author has nothing to do and expresses no opinion. He has introduced this fragment as a part of the history of the times and for no other object. By proclamation of Gov. Gilmer, the Legislature convened on the 18th day of October, 1830, to dispose of the Cherokee lands. Gen. Beall was a representative from the county of Twiggs, with Robert Hodges and Larkin Griffin his colleagues. The business of the session was urgent and complicated. Many questions arose and were discussed with marked ability. To glance at them in detail, and at the speakers who participated, would require more space than could be properly allowed in this work. Among the gentlemen prominent on the floor of the House were John H. Howard, C. J. McDonald, A. Hull, C. Dougherty, Thos. Haynes, Thos. W. Murray, Wiley Williams, Geo. H. Young, Irby Hudson, Wm. Turner, Wm. Schley, C. J. Jenkins, E. J. Black, Geo.W.Towns, and Dennis L. Ryan, — presenting an array of talent which would do credit to any legislative body. Party strife rose high. The old distinctions of Troup and Clark were gradually wearing down in the grave issue as to the power of the Federal Government. The Senate adopted a set of resolutions on this subject, and also laudatory of President Jackson, which were sent to the House for concurrence. Gen. Beall offered a substitute in the following words, after reciting the Protest of the Legislature in 1828 against the Tariff: — ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 31 Be it there/ore revived, &c., That the State of Georgia, influenced by a sense of forbearance and respect for the opinions of the other States, and by community of attachment to the Union, so far as the same may be consistent with self-pjeservation and a determined purpose to preserve the purity of our republican institutions, having, in her sovereign charac- ter, protest-ed against the Tariff, and, by inference, against its dependent meiisure, "internal improvement," as. being an infraction of the sacred bond of our Union, demanded its repeal, and in perpetual testimony thereof deposited that protest and demand in the archives of the Senate of the United States, cannot now, adhering firmly and unalterably as she does to the declaration contained in that instrument, descend, without compromitting her honor and dignity as a sovereign and independent State, to the measures of memorial and remonstrance, which having been patiently resorted to for years were utterly disregarded ; — thus compelling her, in justification of her character to the present generation and to pos- terity, reluctantly to adopt the measure hereinbefore recited. Resolved nevertlieless, by the General Assembly of the State of Georgia, acting for and in behalf of the people thereof, That this State looks with the deepast solicitude to the re-election of General Jackson to the Presi- dency of the United States, because, in that event, we will have the certain guarantee that he will fearlessly go, as far as his official powers will war- rant, " in arresting the profligate expenditure of the public money, extin- guishing the public debt as speedily as possible, and restraining the government to its primitive simplicity in the exercise of aU its functions." The House Journal (p. 361) thus continues : — Mr. Burnes moved the following resolution in lieu of the preamble and resolutions from Senate, and the foregoing preamble and resolutions ofiered by Mr.Beall, of Twiggs: — Resolved, by the people of Georgia, through their Eepresentatives, That they highly approbate the opinions of President Jackson in behalf of the Union and rights of the States, and his administration generally, and that we earnestly recommend his re-election. On the motion to receive said resolution as a substitute in lieu of the preamble and resolutions from the Senate, and the foregoing preamble and resolutions ofiered by Mr. Beall, of Twiggs, the yeas and nays were required to be recorded, and were, — Yeas, 57 ; Nays, 65. So the House refused to receive Mr. Bumes's resolution as a substitute. The question was then put on receiving the preamble and resolutions offered by Mr. Beall, of Twiggs, as a substitute for the preamble and resolutions from the Senate. On which motion the yeas and nays were required to be recorded, and are, — Yeas, 76 ; Nays, 45. So the House agreed to receive the preamble and resolutions offered by Mr. Beall, of Twiggs, as a substitute for the preamble and resolutions of Senate, and the said substitute agreed to by the House. Without aiming to revive party creeds or associations to affect any gentleman, the author merely remarks that Messrs. Black, J. S. Calhotm, Dougherty, Haynes, P. S. Holt, Howard, Hudson, Jenkins, Rvan, Turner, and Young, voted for the substitute of Gen. Beall, and Messrs. Bates, Day, McDonald, Schley, Towns, and Wofford, voted against it. 32 BENCH AND BAH OF GEOKGIA. It was at this session (1830) that the governor transmitted to the Legislature, on the day previous to adjournment, (the same day on which he received the original,) the copy of a mandate from the Chief-Justice of the Supreme Courf of the United States, enjoining the execution of George Tassels, an Indian who had been convicted in Hall Superior Court of the crime of murder, and citing tlie State of Georgia to appear under the writ of error. The following is an extract from Gov. Gilmer's communication: — The object of this mandate is to control the State in the exercise of its ordinary jurisdiction, which in criminal cases has been vested by the Con- Btitution exclusively in its Superior Courts. So far as concerns the exercise of the power which belongs to the Executive Department, orders received from the Supreme Court for the purpose of staying or in any manner interfering with the decisions of the courts of this State, in the exercise of their constitutional jurisdiction, will be resisted with whatever force the laws shall have placed at my command. If the judicial power thus attempted to be exercised by the courts of the United States is submitted to or sustained, it must eventuate in the utter annihilation of the State Governments, or in other consequences not less fatal to the peace and prosperity of our present highly-favored country. After being read, the message was referred with the accompany- ing document to a select committee, consisting of Messrs. Haynes, Beall, of Twiggs, Schley, McDonald, and Howard, of Baldwin, on the part of the House, to join such committee as the Senate might appoint. On the same day, (22d December,) Mr. Haynes, from the com- mittee, made the following report : — Whereas, it appears by a communication made by his Excellency the Governor to this General Assembly that the Chief-Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States has sanctioned a writ of error, and cited the State of Georgia, through her Chief Magistrate, to appear before the Supreme Court of the United States to defend this State against said writ of error, at the instance of one George Tassels, recently convicted in Hall county Superior Court of the crime of murder. And whereas, the right to punish crimes against the peace and good order of this State, in accordance with existing laws, is an original and necessary part of sovereignty which the State of Georgia has never parted with. Be it therefore resolved, &c.. That they view with feelings of the deepest regret the interference by the Chief-Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States in the administration of the criminal laws of this State, and that such an interference is a flagrant violation of her right. Ecsoloed further, That his Excellency the Governor be, and he and every other officer of tliis State is hereby, requested and enjoined to dis- regard any and every mandate and process that has been or shall be served upon him or them, purporting to proceed from the Chief-Justice, or any EOBEPlT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 33 Associate-Jastice, or tbe Supreme Court of tbe United States, for the purpose of arresting any of the criminal laws of this State. And be it further resolved, That his Excellency the Governor be, and he is hereby, authorized and required with all the force and means placed at his command by the Constitution and laws of this State, to resist and repel any and every invasion from whatever quarter, upon the administra- tion of the criminaJ laws of this State. Resolved, That the State of Georgia wUl never so far compromit the sovereignty as an independent State as to become a party to the cause sought to be made before the Supreme Court of the United States by the writ in question. Resolved, That his Excellency the Governor be, and he is hererrith, authorized to communicate to the Sheriff of Hall county, by express, so much of the foregoing resolutions and such orders as are necessary to insure the full execution of the laws in the case of George Tassels, con- victed of murder in Hall county. The House Joiimal (p. 448) states that Mr. Turner offered the following as a substitute to said report, to wit : — Whereas, the circumstances under which the citation to the State from the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Tassels, an Indian, convicted of murder in the Superior Court of Hall county, are unfavorable to calm deliberation; and whereas, the General Assembly have confidence in the intelligence of the Executive and Judicial Departments of the Government of this State, into whose cognizance the case of Tassels will more immediately come. Resolved, That the action of the General Assembly is deemed unneces- sary at the present time in the case of George Tassels aforesaid. On the qnestion to accept this substitute the yeas were 11; nays, 62. Among the former were Messrs. Day, McDonald, Schley, Turner, and C. Wellborn. On the question to agree to the original report the yeas were 73 ; nays, 10. Among the latter were Messrs. Day, McDonald, Schley, Turner, and C. Wellborn. The next day the Senate concurred in the report, and at the appointed time the prisoner was executed under the sentence which his counsel attempted to reverse by writ of error. The case was not further prosecated, as no relief could reach the plaintiff, thus avoiding the conflict of jurisdiction between the Federal and State Governments in the last resort, practically. As another scrap of political history deserves preservation, the author makes no apology for a somewhat-extended notice of the Anti-Tariff Convention held at Milledgeville, and especially as Gen. Beall was a delegate from Bibb, and prominent in its delibe- rations. The official record of its proceedings is now before the author, and he copies the names of all the delegates, with such other matters as seem most relevant. Vol. L— 3 34 BENCH AND BAK OF GEORGIA. The Convention met in the Representative Chamber at three o'clock in the afternoon of Monday, 12th November, 1832, when the following delegates appeared from their respective counties : — 1. Appling — Malcolm Morrison. 2. Baker — Young Allen. 3. Baldwin — William H. Torrance and Saml. Rockwell. 4. Bibb — Robert A. Beall and Robert Collins. 5. Bullock — Samuel L. Lockhart. 6. Burke — J. Lewis, E. Hughes, and David Taylor, Jr. 1. Camden — H. R. Ward and J. Hull. 8. Cherokee — Z. B. Hargrove and W. W. Williamson. 9. Clark — A. S. Clayton, Thos. Moore, and J. Ligon. 10. Columbia — Isaac Ramsey, W. A. L. Collins, and J. Cartledge. 11. Coweta — Thos. Watson a,ndi Owen H. Kenan. 12. Crawford — Henry Orowell and Hiram Warner. 13. Decatur — Brury Fort and Jehu W. Keith. 14. De Kalb — Lewis J. Bupree, B. Kiddoo,' and 0. Clark. 15. Dooly — Thomas H. Key. 16. Early — Josiah S. Patterson. 17. Effingham — Clem. Powers. 18. Elbert — Beverly Allen, I. N. Davis, and J. M. Tate. 19. Emanuel — John R. Baniel. 20. Glynn — Thomas Butler King. 21. Greene — W. C. Dawson, J. G. Matthews, and W. Greer. 22. Gwinnett— j; Cr. Park, W. Maltbie, Hines Holt, and S. McMullin. 23. Hall— W. H. Underwood, J. McAfee, R. Sanford, and N. Grarrison. 24. Hancock — Thos. Haynes, Tully Vinson, and James Lewis. 25. Harris — ^Jacob M. Guerry and Barkly Martin. 26. Heard — Rene Fitzpatrick. 27. Henry— J.. R. Moore, G-ihson Clark, J.Johnson and J. Coker. 28. Houston — Walter L. Campbell, HughLawson, and C. Well- born. 29. Irwin — William Slone. 30. Jackson — David Witt, J. Park, and J. G-. Pittman. 31. Jasper— Alfred Cuthbert, B. A. Reese, and M. Phillips. 32. Jefferson — Roger L. Gamble and Philip S. Lemlie. 33. Jones— W. S. C. Reid, J. L. Lewis, and T. G. Barron. 34. Laurens— David Blackshear and Eason Allen. 35. Lee — John Cr. Oliver. "' 36. Lincoln — Rem Remson and Peter Lamar. ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 35 37. Madison — Thog. Long and W. M. Morton. 38. Marion — ^Wiley Williams. 39. Mcintosh — Thomas Spalding and James Troup. 40. Meriwether — ^W. D. Alexander and Htigh W. Ector. 41. Monroe — John Macpherson Berrien, Thos. N. Seall, Geo. W. Gordon, and Elbridge G. Cabiness. 42. Montgomery — Joseph Ryals. 43. Morgan — ^W. S. Stokes, Van Leonard, and C. Campbell. •44. Muscogee — Allen Lawhon and A. S. Clifton. 45. Newton — Charles Kennon, Richard L. Sims, and Seth P. Storrs. 46. Oglethorpe — George R. Gilmer and John Moore. 47. Pulaski — Burwell W.Bracewell. 48. Putnam — L. W. Hudson, C. P. Gordon, and W. W. Mason. ' 49. Rabun — Samuel Farris and Henry T. Mosely. 50. Randolph — Benjamin Holland. 51. Richmond — John Forsyth, William Gamming, and John P. King. 52. Scriven — A. S. Jones and P. L. Wade. 53. Talbot— Samuel W. Flournay and N. B. Powell. 54. Taliaferro — Absalom Janes and S. C. Jeffries. 55. Tatnall — Joseph Tillman. 56. Thomas — William H. Reynolds and A. J. Dozier. 57. Troup — Samuel A. Bailey and Julius C. Alford. 58. Upson — Reuben J. Crews and John Robinson. 59. Walton— TAos. W. Harris, T. J. Hill, and Orion Stroud. 60. Warren — Henry Lockhart and Thos. G-ibson, Jr. 61. Washington — S. Robinson, J. Peabody, and Morgan Brown. From the above roll, it appears that one hundred and thirty delegates presented credentials from sixty-one counties. The Hon. George R. Gilmer was elected president, and William Y. Hansell, Benjamin T. Mosely, and Mansfield Torrance, Esqs., were appointed secretaries. On motion of Mr. Torrance, Resolved, That a committee of twenty-one be appointed, whose duty it shall be to report resolutions expressive of the sense of this Convention in relation to the Protective System, and the best and most efficient mode of obtaining relief from the evils of that system ; and that the said com- mittee be further instructed to report what objects ought to engage the attention of this Convention, and what will be the most efficient means of accomplishing the same. After the appointment of a Committee on Rules to govern the 36 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. Convention, nothing more was done the first afternoon. On the second day, Mr. Forsyth submitted the following : — Resolved, That a committee of five be appointed by the president to examine and report to this bod}' at its next meeting, the authority of the persons assembled as Delegates from the different counties of the State to represent the people of their respective counties; the resolutions, if any, under which the election in each county was held; the notice given of the time of the election; the manner of holding it, the number of votes given at the election, and the number of voters in the county. Resolved, That the individuals who have been elected as a committee of what is known as the Athens meeting, be, and they are hereby, requested to present to this body the correspondence they have held con- nected with the object of their appointment. Mr. Torrance offered, in lieu of the first resolution, the following as a substitute : — Resolved, That a Committee of Elections and Appointments be now appointed to inquire into the right of any member to hold his seat, when- ever the same shall be contested, and report the facts to the Convention. After a little skirmishing the resolutions and substitute were laid on the table for the present. The president then announced the appointment of the Committee of Twenty-one, to wit : — Messrs. Blackshear, Berrien, Forsyth, Gumming, Clayton, Cuthbert, Gamble, Reese, Spalding, Tait, Rockwell, Beall, of Bibb, Taylor, of Biu-ke, Bailey, Warner, Dawson, Haynes, Gordon, of Putnam, Clark, of Henry, Janes, and Harris. On the third day, on motion of Mr. Rockwell, Resolved, That the Governor, President of the Senate, Speaker of the House of Kepresentatives, Judges of the Superior Courts, and the Hon. David Johnson and Chancellor Harper, of South Carolina, and editors and reporters of newspapers, be provided with seats within the bar. The Convention then resumed the unfinished business of the previous day and took up the first resolution of Mr. Forsyth, which, being read, Mr. Berrien proposed to amend it by striking out the following: — "The resolutions, if any, under which the election in each county was held ; the notice given of the time of the election ; the manner of holding it, the number of votes given in the county" — and insert in lieu thereof the following words, to wit : — " and that the report of the said committee, when approved by this Convention, shall be attached to the proceedings of this body, to be submitted to the people of Georgia for their approba- tion or rejection." Perhaps on no other occasion in Georgia was there such an imposing display of eloquence. Mr. Forsyth stood forth in the KOBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 37 majesty of his intetiect and the graces of his unrivalled elocution. For three days the Convention and the crowded galleries listened to the debate with rapt attention. All conceded the victory to Mr. Forsyth in the preliminary discussion. He seemed as a giant, bearing down all obstacles in his way. Mr. Berrien took the floor amid plaudits from the gallery. He waved his hand and shook his head gravely, his beaming face upward, to repress the demonstration in his favor. What delight he afforded all present by his polished style and sweet delivery, may he imagined by those who ever had the good fortune to hear this American Cicero. Other speakers participated in the discussion; but the author does not remember all of them, although a spectator. Col. William Cujimixg, in point of dignity and force, called to mind a proud Roman Senator. ^Messrs. Clayton, Torrance, Rockwell, Cuthbert, Spalding, Beall, G.W. Gordon, Haynes, and Alford, were among the principal debaters. Gov. Gilmer made an argument with his usual zeal and ability on the main question, at another stage of the Convention. In the mean time the president submitted to the Convention communications from the Hon. David Johnson and Chancellor Harper, touching political events in South Carolina, which were severally referred to the Committee of Twenty-one. On Friday, Gen. Blackshear, Chairman of the Committee of Twenty-one, made a report, which was read to the Convention by Mr. Berrien, the author of the report. It is too long for inser- tion here, though its ability would interest the political reader. After a brief preamble, it affirms, — 1. That the Federal Government is a confederacy formed by the States composing the same, for the specific purposes expressed in the Constitu- tion, and for those alone. 2. That every exercise by the Federal Government, or by any depart- ment thereof, of powers not granted by the Constitution, notwithstanding it may he under the forms of law, is, in relation to the constituent States, a. mere usurpation. 3. That a government of limited powers can have no constitutional right to judge in the last resort of its own use or abuse of the powers con- ferred upon it, since that would be to substitute for the limitations of the constitutional charter the judgment of the agents who were employed to carry it into effect, — to annihilate those limitations by a power derived from the same instrument which created them. 4. That the Federal Government is a government the powers of which are expressly limited by the Constitution which created it, and can there- fore have no constitutional right to judge in the last resort of the use or abuse of those powers. 5. That it is essential to a confederated government, the powers of 38 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. which are expressly limited by the constitution which creates it, that there should exist somewhere a power authoritatively to interpret that instrument, — to decide in the last resort on the use or abuse of the authority which it confers upon the common agent of the confederating States : that such a power cannot belong to the agent, since that would be to substitute his judgment for the constitutional limitation; and that, in the absence of a common arbiter expressly designated by the Constitu- tion for this purpose, each State as such for itself, and in virtue of its sovereignty, is necessarily remitted to the exercise of that right. 6. That the several States composing this Union were, at the adoption of the Federal Constitution, free, sovereign, and independent States; that they have not divested themselves of this character by the relinquishment of certain powers to the Federal Government, — having associated with their sister states for purposes entirely compatible with the continued existence of their own original freedom, sovereignty, and independence. The seventh resolution declares the several Tariff acts of Con- gress, designed for the protection of domestic manufactures, unconstitutional and void. The eighth avers attachment to the Union, and perseverance in the means of redress. The ninth refuses to submit, and asks for consultation and concert with sister States to resist usurped authority ; and the tenth recommends the aggrieved States to hold a Southern Convention. The eleventh authorizes the president to appoint five superintendents in each county to take the sense of the people on the proceedings of the Convention, by voting at polls to be kept open from the 15th De- cember until the second Monday in February then next. The twelfth requires public notice of the result to be given, and the citizens to elect, by general ticket on the fourth Monday in March, delegates to represent Georgia in the proposed Convention of States. The tljirteenth is for the Convention to meet again on the first Monday in July. The fourteenth is the following : — Resolved, That the President of this Convention do communicate the aforegoing resolutions, from one to ten inclusive, to the Governors of the several Southern States having common interests with us in the removal of the grievances of which we complain ; to the Governors of the other States at his discretion, and asking them to give publicity to the same within their respective States, and earnestly inviting them to unite with us in Convention as the sure, perhaps the only, means of preserving the peace of the Union. The three other resolutions provide for the appointment of a Central Committee in Baldwin, to whom all the county superin- tendents shall certify the action before them ; for the publication of twenty thousand copies of the proceedings of the Conven- tion, &c. In the appendix to the Journal of the Convention, it is stated KOBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 39 that the following substitute to the Report of the Committee of " Twenty-one" was offered by Mr. Forsyth, in committee, and rejected : — Resolved, That it is not necessary to reiterate in a new form the opinions of the people on the subject of the Tariff, or the necessity for the abandonment of the protective system, to preserve the Union and to maintain harmony among the States. Resolved, That a Southern Convention should be called to consult on the best measures to procure a final and speedy abandonment of it by the General Government. Resolved, That the Legislature should provide for the appointment of Delegates to meet a Southern Convention whenever all the States south of the Potomac and north of the Mississippi agree to appoint their delegates for that purpose. Before a vote was taken in the Convention on the Report of the Committee of " Twenty-one," and after the rejection of his resolu- tion touching the " authority of gentlemen to speak in the name of the people," Mr. Forsyth laid on the secretary's table a pro- test signed by himself and about fifty other delegates, all of whom then retired together from the Convention. The scene was very exciting, but it passed off quietly, and the remaining majority pro- ceeded with their business as though nothing material had occurred to weaken their deliberations. After sundry propositions and a few slight amendments, the report was agreed to by a vote of, — ^Yeas, 64; Nays, 6. Com- paring the roll as given with those voting on the adoption of the report, the names of the seceding delegates are pretty well ascer- tained ; and on this basis the author has marked them in italics, merely for reference as to old party divisions. Two important committees were appointed, — one to address the people of Georgia, consisting of Messrs. Berrien, Clayton, Gordon, of Putnam, Beall, of Bibb, and Torrance ; and the other, styled the " Central Committee," consisting of Messrs. W. H. Torrance, S. Rockwell, John H. Howard, Samuel Boykin, and James S. Cal- houn, whose duty it should be " to take all necessary steps to giving effect to the measures of this Convention," — both of which committees soon afterwards published able addresses to the people of Georgia on the matters with which they were respectively charged. The author has dwelt freely on these topics for the principal reason that the young men of the State may understand the condition of parties more than twenty years ago, at a season of great peril to the Union ; and also because the Convention referred 40 BEUCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA, to was anterior to the "Ordinance of Nullification" in a sister State, — all the proceedings in Carolina in opposition to the Tariff having the hearty sanction of Gen. Beall, whose opinions are to be illustrated by facts. Of the ten gentlemen on the two committees who thus appealed to the people of Georgia against the oppressions of the General Government, Maj. Howard is the only survivor ! No formal action was ever had at the ballot-box to carry out the objects of the Convention. One incident, or rather legislative expression, though omitted at the proper place, connected" with the public life of Gen. Beall, the author begs to introduce here. At the session of 1830, the late Gov. Towns, then a Representative, offered in the House a set of resolutions, the character of which may be inferred from the closing sentence of one of them : — " That disunion, it is firmly believed, will bring in its train discord, misery, and civil war ; and finally, that the people of this State deem those as their worst and bitterest enemies who seek to sow the seeds of disunion, and introduce the wretched doctrines of Consolidation and Nullification amongst them." On the motion of Mr. Dougherty they were laid on the table for the present, — ^Yeas, 86 ; Nays, 42. Mr. Bailey then moved to lay on the table, for the balance of the session, the resolutions of Gen. Beall, (to be seen elsewhere in this memoir,) and those offered by Mr. Murray, which was refused, — Yeas, 49 ; Nays, 74. On the question to adopt the preamble and resolutions of Gen. Beall, Mr. Brewster, of Gwinnett, moved to amend by adding, And he it further resolved, That the people of Georgia disapprove of the political opinions of the Hon. George M. Troup, as expressed in his toast at the Jefferson celebration dinner at Washington City, and in his letter replying to an invitation to the Columbia dinner. The amendment was, on motion of Mr. Turner, laid on the table for the remainder of the session, — Yeas, 93 ; Nays, 31. Among those voting against laying the amendment on the table, were Messrs. McDonald, Schley, and Towns. To understand what Mr. Brewster sought to condemn, the toast is here introduced : — By Gov. Troup, of Georgia. The Government of the United States : With more limited powers than the Republic of San Marino, it rules an empire more extended than the Roman, with the absoluteness of Tiberius, with ^ess wisdom than Augustus, and less justice than Trajan and the Antonines. ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 41 The following is an extract from Gov. Troup's letter of Septem- ber 21, 1830, referred to in the amendment : — Whatever the people of South Carolina in Convention shall resolve for their safety, interest, and happiness, will be right, and none will have the right to question it. You can change your own government at pleasure, and therefore you can throw oflF the government of the Union whenever the same safety, interest, and happiness require it. The author has thus followed Gen. Beall through his public career; and he concludes by a brief notice of his family, his declining health, and his religious opinions. Gen. Beall inherited the full name of his venerable father, who for many years resided in the county of Warren. Major Robert Augustus Beall, Sr., was universally beloved for his intelligence and virtues. He was a gentleman of easy address, and retained the etiquette of the olden time. He had a large family of chil- dren, mostly daughters, whom he educated in the best manner. His liberal hospitality, and the expense of sustaining a fashionable position in society, impaired his fortune and caused him to experi- ence reverses in his old age. He bore all, however, with compo- sure. At the election for commissioners to distribute the Cherokee lands by lottery, in 1831—2, he was chosen by the Legislature as one of the Board ; and, though infirm from age, he discharged his duties to the entire satisfaction of the public. He died some twenty years ago. Dr. Henry Lockhart of Apalachicola, Edward B. Young, of Eufaula, William H. Young and Robert M. Gunby, of Columbus, Robert Billups, of Texas, and John Billups, of Alabama, married his daughters. He had other children, two sons, William and Josias, with whom the author was slightly acquainted. The latter, Josias B. Beall, was killed in Texas at the massacre of Fannin's and Ward's command at Goliad, in 1886. In October, 1828, Gen. Beall intermarried with Caroline, the heiress of Richard Smith, Esq., a wealthy citizen of Twiggs county. The portion of his wife was large, consisting of lands, slaves, and other valuables. Considerably in debt at the time, and having no skill or talent for accumulation. Gen. Beall permitted his affairs to become entangled in spite of the proceeds of his estates. The income reported by his managers was not equal to the lawful inte- rest on the capital employed in this form. He took up the idea that, by converting his property into bank-stock, it would be more productive in the shape of dividends, on which he might check at pleasure. He sold his estates, retaining servants for the house- hold, but the money was never converted into bank securities. An 42 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. expensive style of living, and constant drains upon his purse, of which he did not see the drift at the time, led to a wreck of hia fortune in eight years. His hospitality was that of a prince. No man could dispense the honors of such a life more gracefully, or with happier effect on his guests. The health of Gen. Beall was never robust. His complexion was always bilious, and he had frequent attacks of colic from which he suffered severely. The following letter to the author shows his condition at such times : — Macon, February lOtb, 1882. Dear Major : — Will you be at Houston Court ? If yea, carry over our papers; and if not, send them so as to reach there early Monday morning. From the present state of my health, I consider it very doubtful whether I shall be able to attend. I last night took an emetic which threatened for some time serious consequences. It produced, in the first instance, cramp in my stomach, which finally extended to all my limbs. I was finally reUeved by the professional skill of Dr. Baber. I made out a set of interrogatories in the case of , in which we are counsel for the defendant, to take the te.stimony of , and left them with a friend for Judge Holt to carry down. They were neglected to be given to him and mislaid. Will you make out another set, and forward them to M. Myers, Esq., for execution ? I do not know what questions to ask, but our client requests it, and he is entitled to have his wishes gratified. Ask her if did not give the negro to his wife upon their separation, &c., and any other questions which may occur to you. Ask her what she stated to in Marion, on the subject of 's title to the negro. Tours truly, Kobt. A. Beall. He was compelled to be abstemious in diet ; and amidst the dis- sipated company into which his late hours threw him. he never drank to intoxication. He was generally cheerful, and always ready to converse with his friends, even after his heaviest losses, without betraying his inward struggles. With the people he was a decided favorite, ever accessible and friendly. His countenance had a firm, yet benignant expression; it was lit up by dark, sparkling eyes, that charmed all who gazed upon them. He was an adept in human nature; and his success in controlling the minds of men by his suavity was an obstacle to his advancement in the law by enabling him to achieve by words easily uttered what others had failed to accomplish by hard labor, — the satisfaction of clients. As before stated, he put off drudgery to the last. When forced, however, to apply himself, he would toil with his pen, or at his books, the whole night, and come into court next morning fresh and courteous, with triumph on his brow. ROBERT AUGUSTUS BEALL. 43 Previous to 1835, Gen. Beall had been a skeptic in religion. During a revival in Macon that year, under the ministry of the Rev. John Howard, his infidelity was crushed and he became a new man, rejoicing in the pardon of his sins. He connected him- self with the Methodist Episcopal Church, and was frequently called on to pray in public. He engaged with zeal in the services of the sanctuary, and with happy effect on the minds of others. His mortal career was now drawing to a close. In the spring of 1886, his constitution gave way, and, after a lingering illness of several months, he died in peace, July 16, 1836. His death pro- duced a deep sensation in the community. Extensive funeral honors were paid him. The bar, and literary societies of which he was a member, manifested peculiar respect for his memory. The press teemed with eulogies ; and men of all parties united in con- fessing his extraordinary gifts, and the lofty qualities which marked his character ; — all mourned his exit as a public loss. Such was Robert Augustus Beall, — a man of worth and infirmity. III. JOHN MACPHERSON EERRIEN, LL.D. The annals of America furnish many distinguished names in the Cabinet and in the field, in the Judiciary and in .the halls of legislation. John Macpherson Berkien has been too recent an actor in public affairs for his character as yet to possess that influ- ence over the minds of men which it is destined to exert. While living, he had to encounter an active political rivalry which was not always scrupulous in the means employed to gain its point. He lived to establish a reputation of which any orator, jurist, statesman, or scholar, might justly be proud. It will be the object of the author to gather up a few broken fragments in the history of this remarkable man, and to render that justice to his memory which an admiring public will readily sanction. Of his ancestry much might be said to gratify his descendants. On the revocation of the Edict of Nantz by Louis XIV., in 1685, withdrawing from the Protestants the security afforded them in the exercise of their religion by Henry IV., in 1598, the best blood of France was dispersed in foreign countries. America became the asylum of many of the persecuted religionists, called Hugue- nots originally in contempt, but now a term which has a universal significancy, conveying the ideas of fortitude and the loftiest vir- tues. His paternal ancestors descended from the Huguenots who fled from France into Holland when the Edict of Nantz was revoked. John Berrien, his grandfather, was one of the judges of the Supreme Court of New Jersey ; and his father, Major John Berrien, at a very early age removed to Georgia. He was with "Washington's army at Valley Forge, participated gallantly in the battle of Monmouth, June 28, 1778, and in several other engage- ments. He continued in the service until the close of the war. In the mean time he married, at Philadelphia, Margaret Macpher- son, whose brother, John Macpherson, was aid-de-camp to General Montgomery, and fell with him at Quebec. Another brother was General William Macpherson, who gave up his commission in the British army and escaped to the American lines, in which he ren- dered efficient service. 44 JOHN MACPHEKSON BERRIEN. 45 In the house occupied by General Washington as head-quarters whence he issued his farewell address to the army, John Mac- PHERSON Berrien was bom on the 23d day of August, 1781, in the State of New Jersey. His father brought him to Georgia when he was only a few months old. When of a suitable age, he was sent to various schools in New York and New Jersey. He graduated at Princeton at the age of fifteen. The late Judge Gaston, of North Carolina, was a classmate. On his return to Georgia, he read law in the office of the Hon. Joseph Clay, and was admitted to the bar in 1799, before he completed his eighteenth year. In 1809, he was elected Solicitor- General, and the next year Judge of the Eastern circuit. The latter office he held four terms. While on the bench, the question of the constitutionality of the alleviating law came before him ; and, in a convention of all the judges at Augusta, he delivered the opinion declaring the act to be unconstitutional. This was a triumph of law over popular excitement. The people were dis- tressed in financial matters, and had elected a majority to the Legislature to grant relief, even to the suspension of debts, or at least of the process enforcing them. The public judgment has long since exploded all such measures as the veriest trifling with difficulties, to say nothing of the principle. While war existed with Great Britain from 1812 to 1815, Judge Berrien was elected to the command of a regiment of volunteer cavalry, which rendezvoused at Darien, watching the British forces on St. Simon's Island and elsewhere in that quarter. No opportunity, however, of conflict with the enemy occurred. He thus united the civil and military character in as perfect a model as the forum and the camp ever presented ; for he was not the man to hold any office without making it honorable by the dignity and qualifications which he brought to the discharge of its duties. The only time when complaint or dissatisfaction was even whis- pered on account of any of his judicial acts was when he gave sentence on the trial of Hopkins for the murder of Mcintosh. It seems that the overseer of Hopkins assisted his escape in a boat, and had no further connection with the offence. On conviction for manslaughter, the principal was sent to the penitentiary without labor, and the overseer was subjected to hard labor for a term of years. The public, not acquainted with the facts, became indig- nant at the discrimination, — the rich culprit to lounge at his ease in the State prison, while his poor, innocent friend was doomed to 46 BESCH AND BAB OF GEORGIA. the anvil or the workbench in constant toil, in sight of each other. An investigation was demanded by Judge Berrien, and, at the session of the Legislature in 1818, both Houses decided unani- mously that there was no just ground for the charge. The fact was, the presiding judge saw that to compel Mr. Hopkins, in his feeble condition, to perform the ordinary labor of a convict would be to take his life by judicial execution when a less punish- ment was all that the law authorized. Such an act of humanity, so far from deserving censure, merits approbation. It required moral courage of a high order to confront the possibilities of mis- construction, and to vindicate the act when assailed. After closing his judicial career with the highest credit to him- self and with the hearty approval of the people of Georgia, Judge Berrien consented to serve his fellow-citizens of Chatham county, in the years 1822 and 1823. During the latter session,* as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, he introduced the fol- lowing : — ReBolved, hy the General Assembly of the State of Georgia, That it is expedient that some fit and proper person should be appointed by the Legislature at its present session to compile and digest the statute-laws of Enpiland that are now in force in the' State of Georgia, and whose duty it shall be within two years to report the same to his Excellency the Governor, who, after the same has been examined of three learned in the law, to be appointed by him for that purpose, shall approve or disapprove of the same, and for their said services shall be paid by the Governor put of the contingent fund ; and when the said work shall be performed and approved, that his Excellency the Governor be, and he is hereby, author- ized to subscribe for two thousand copies in convenient bound volumes : Provided, the same does not exceed the price of four dollars per volume, to be disposed of and distributed as the Legislature may direct. This resolution passed both Houses, and was approved by the Governor, who appointed the Hon. Thomas U. P. Charlton, William Davies, and Charles Harris, of Savannah, to examine the work prepared by the Hon. William Schley, — well known to the profes- sion as Schley's Digest. His abilities were so conspicuous in the State Senate that Mr. Berrien was elected in 1824 to the Senate of the United States, and took his seat in that body March 4, 1825, at a time when it was an honor indeed to represent a sovereign State in the Councils of the Union. Unfortunately, the Senatorial robes do not confer as much reputation in these latter days, owing to causes easily understood. While something is lost on the score of dignity by * See Senate Journal, p. 178. JOHN MACPHERSOX BERRIEN. 47 the contrast, much is perhaps gained to popular rights, among which may he included the right of very moderate men to exercise high puhlic trusts. Judge Berrien at once took a commanding position in the Senate. He shared in the dehates only on import- ant questions, and then, maturely prepared as he never failed to he, his arguments -were sustained by a logic and eloquence which gave universal delight. When Judge Berrien entered the Senate of the United States, in 1825, he was in the forty-fourth year of his age, — bordering on that golden period when enthusiasm usually abates and the purer offices of the intellect are brought into full action. He had quite a youthful appearance, and gained from Chief-Justice Marshall the appellation of the " honey-tongued Georgia youth." At the session of the Legislature of Georgia in 1828, a " Pro- test" against the Tariff was adopted, which was committed to our Senators, Judge Berrien, and his colleague, Hon. 0. H. Prince, to be laid before Congress. In January, 1829, Judge Berrien sub- mitted this document in a style so beautiful and impressive that his speech on the occasion was justly termed by the press a model of its kind. The title of American Cicero was accorded to him, and never did he forfeit the proud distinction. On the election of General Jackson to the Presidency, in 1828, that distinguished personage tendered the office of Attorney-Gene- ral to Judge Berrien, thus making him one of his constitutional advisers. It was accepted, and in March, 1829, he resigned his seat in the Senate and passed into the Cabinet. No man had brighter prospects or a smoother way, to all appearances. The first annoyance to which he was subjected was a complaint by Gen. Call that the office of Attorney-General brought him in con- flict with a large number of important land-claims in Florida, in which he had been previously of counsel adverse to the United States, and that the President was not apprized of this relation when he made the appointment. Judge Berrien promptly met the charge, and asserted that he distinctly informed Gen. Jackson of his professional connection with these claims, and reserved the right to fulfil his existing engagements with his clients. With this understanding he accepted the office of Attorney-General, and nothing more was heard on the subject. When he removed to Washington City as a member of the Cabinet, his family consisted mostly of daughters, Mrs. Berrien having died a short time previously. This fact is mentioned here as applicable to the cause which led to the dissolution of the 48 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. Cabinet in 1831. No attempt to give the history of this affair will be made further than is necessary to place the conduct of Mr. Berrien in its true light. The sympathies of the President had been invoked by his Secretary of War (Maj. Eaton) in his domestic affairs, because certain members of the Cabinet (all, indeed, except Mr. Van Buren, who was a widower) had omitted those courtesies which society had established respecting formal visits or calls, either in person or by card, as the case might hap- pen,— that Mrs. Eaton was not honored by the presence of those gentlemen or their families at her regular levees, nor were her "calls" returned. The cry of persecution was raised, which touched the sensibilities of Gen. Jackson, who rashly undertook to "regulate" these family matters. The consequence was that his authority in this sphere was not admitted, each gentleman leaving his own family to decide npon their company. Dissensions con- tinued to increase. Gen. Jackson was not in the habit of yielding his point; nor were the Attorney-General, Secretary of the Trea- sury, and Secretary of the Navy, (Berrien, Ingham, and Branch,) disposed to surrender their domestic government to his dictation. They at once resigned. Much was said on the subject at the time. The United States Telegraph, edited by Gen. Duff Green, was the official organ of the administration ; but adhering to Mr. Calhoun in his quarrel with the President, simultaneously with the rupture of the Cabinet, it was superseded by the Globe, with F. P. Blair as editor, who denied the retiring members of the Cabinet the privi- lege of vindicating their course through its columns. Mr. Berrien, as also Messrs. Ingham and Branch, severally published addresses to the people of the United States, setting forth the whole matter in quite a spirited array. Wiles' Register, and all the leading papers of the day, copied the appeals, and the counter-state- ments of all the high functionaries concerned. Mr. Berrien never wrote with more animation and eloquence than in this controversy. The followiiig correspondence between Mr. Berrien and the President is submitted : — Washington, June 15, 1831. Sir : — I herewith tender to you my resignation of the office of Attorney- G-eneral of the United States. Two considerations restrained me from taking this step at the moment when your communication to the Secretary of the Treasury, announcing your determination to reorganize your Cabi- net, first met my eye. There was nothing in the retirement of the Secre- taries of State or of War, or in the distinct and personal considerations which they had assigned for this measure, which made it obligatory upon, or even proper for, me to adopt a similar course. Such a step, with any reference to that occurrence, could only become so on my part as an act JOBS MACPHBKSON BEBBIEH. 49 of conformity to your will. Tou had felt tUs, and lad announced your wishes to the Secretaries of the Treasury and Navy respectively. I had a right to expect a similar communication of them, and conformed to the wishes and opinions of my fellow-citizens of Georgia when I determined to await it. An additional consideration was pr&sented by the fact that I had been charged, at the moment of my departure from this place, with the performance of certain public duties which were yet unfinished, and my report concerning which yon did not expect to receive until my return. I was gratified to learn frum yourself that you had taken the same view of the subject, having postponed the communication of your wishes to me until my arrival at this place, without expecting in the mean time any communication from me. It is due to myself further to state that, from the moment when I saw the communication referred to, I have considered my official relation to you as terminated, or as subsisting only until my return to the city should enable me to conform to your wishes by the final surrender of my office, which it is the purpose of this note to make. I retire, then, sir, with cheerfolness from the station to which youi- confidence had called me, because I have the consciousness of having endeavored to discharge its duties with fidelity to myself and to the coun- try. Uninfluenced by those considerations which have been avowed by that portion of my colleagues who have voluntarily separated themselves from you, totally ignorant of any want of harmony in your Cabinet, which either has or ought to have impeded the operations of your administra- tion, I performed this act simply in obedience to your will. I have not the slightest disposition to discuss the question of its propriety. It is true that, in a government like ours, power is bat a trust to be used for the benefit of those who have delegated it, and that circumstances might exist in which the necessity of self-vindication would justify such an inquiry. The first consideration belongs to those to whom we are both and equally accountable. From the influence of the second you have relieved me by your explicit declaration that no complaint affecting either my official or individual conduct has at any time reached you. You have assured me that the confidence which induced you origin^y to confer the appointment upon me remains unshaken and undiminished, and have been pleased to express the regret which you feel at the separation which circumstances have, in your view of the subject, rendered unavoidable. You have kindly added the assurance of your continued good wishes for my wel£are. You will not, therefore, refuse me the gratification of expressing my earnest hope that, under the influence of better counsels, your own and the interests of our common country may receive all the benefits which you may have anticipated from the change of your confi- dential advisers. A very few days will enable me to put my office in a condition for the reception of my successor, and I will advise you of the fact as soon as its arrangement is completed. I am respectfully, sir, your obedient servant, Jn. Macpherson Bereien. To THE President of the United States. Wasbhigtoii, June 15, 1831. Sir: — I have received your letter resigning the office of Attorney- General. In the conversation which I held with you the day before yesterday Vol. I.— 4 50 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. upon tliis subject, it was my desire to present to you the considerations upon which I acted in accepting the resignation of the other members of the Cabinet, and to assure you, in regard to yourself as well as to them, that they imply no dissatisfaction with the manner in which the duties of the respective departments have been performed. It affords me great pleasure to find that you have not misconceived the character of those considerations, and that you do justice to the personal feelings with which they are connected. I will only add that the determination to change my Cabinet was dic- tated by an imperious sense of public duty, and a thorough, though pain- ful, conviction that the stewardship of power with which I am clothed called for it as a measure of justice to those who had been alike invited to maintain near me the relation of confidential advisers. Perceiving that the harmony in feeling, so necessary to an efficient administration, had failed in a considerable degree to mark the course of this, and having assented on this account to the voluntary retirement of the Secretaries of State and War, no alternative was left me but to give this assent a lati- tude coextensive with the embarrassments whiqh it recognised, and the duty which I owed to each member of the Cabinet. In accepting your resignation as Attorney-General, I take pleasure in expressing my approbation of the zeal and efficiency with which its duties have been performed, and in assuring you that you carry with you my best wishes for your prosperity and happiness. I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant, Andrew Jackson. John M. Berrien, Esq. P.S. — You will please continue to discharge the duties of the office of Attorney-General until you make all those arrangements which you may deem necessary, which, when completed, and I am notified thereof by you, a successor will be appointed. A. J. Washingtos, June 22, 1831. Sir : — In conformity to the suggestion contained in your note of the 15th inst., I have to notify you that the arrangements necessary to put the office of the Attorney-General in a condition for the reception of my successor are now complete. The misinterpretations which are contained in the newspapers on the subject of my retirement from office make it proper that this correspond- ence should be submitted to the public^ as an act of justice both to you and to myself I am, respectfully, sir, your obedient servant, Jn. Macpherson Berrien. To THE President op the United States. Washington, June 22, 1831. Sir : — Your note of this day is received, advising me " In conformity to the suggestions contained in my (your) note of the 15th inst., I (you) have to inform you (me) that the arrangements necessary to put the office of the Attorney-General in a condition for the reception of my successor are now complete." For reasons assigned in your note, you further observe, " make it proper that this correspondence should be submitted to the public, as an JOHN MACPHEESOX BEKRIEN. 51 act of justice both to you and myself." — I am sure I can have no objec- tion to your submitting them as you propose, as you believe this to be necessary. I am, respectfully, your obedient servant, Andrew Jackson. John M. Berrien, Esq. Here the author will go back a few years to notice two literary disconrses delivered by Mr. Berrien, — one at Athens, in 1828, and the other at Princeton, in 1830. On the first occasion, he and Judge Clayton were the orators, each representing one of the rival societies of Franklin College. Both selected Eloquence as the theme, — one contending that it could be acquired by art, and ought to be methodical and persuasive ; the other that oratory was a natural gift, and moved the passions of men by storm, without any particular rules. These two were highly-finished productions, and still rank among the classics of the day. The discourse at Princeton was delivered while Mr. Berrien was Attorney- General, in the zenith of his fame, with a cloudless future before him. He was said to be so much a favorite of President Jackson that the mantle of Chief-Justice Marshall would probably be cast on his shoulders if the opportunity occurred. The author well remembers the warm compliments and predictions of honor that flowed upon Mr. Berrien from all quarters. And he will further add, that it was in the Princeton address he learned for the first time, from a man so gifted and successful, so com- manding in genius and reputation, as Mr. Berrien, that glory was a delusion. The passage to which he refers the author committed to memory at the time, and he will venture to repeat it for its sound philosophy. Addressing himself to the graduating class, Mr. Ber- rien said : — My young brothers ! The world on which you are entering in all the ardor of hope, in all the purity of nncormpted feeling, is arrayed in charms which it borrows from fancy, and which wiU vanish at your approach. The pleasure with which it allures the unwary is brief and evanescent as the dream of the morning. Its floats gaily on the advan- cing tide, but vanishes with the flood. Tou wUI be too surely called to exert the courage which can encounter danger with calmness, and the fortitude which endures and triumphs over calamity; but, on this side the grave, the beautiful vision which now dazzles your inexperienced eye will forever elude your grasp. Human life is but a step in the infinite series of existence, — a point at which a man pauses to look around him before he launches on eternity's ocean. In 1830, a volume of " Sketches of Public Characters" appeared from the New York press, in which (p. 68) Mr. Berrien is thus introduced : — 52 BENCH AKD BAR OF GEOBGIA. The present Attorney-General, John Macpherson Berrien, is from Georgia, but I understand that he is a native of Philadelphia. He is a most eloquent speaker. In the Senate he was a model for cha.ste, free, beautiful elocution. He seemed to be the only man that Webster softened his voice to, when he turned from his seat to address him. There is not the slightest dash in his manner : it is as grave as it is pleasant. His views are clear, and he meets the subject manfully. In his arguments there is no demagogical praises of his constituents, no tirade of abuse against his opponents or of the section of country from whence they came. He is said to have been a good judge on the bench and an exceUent lawyer at the bar, and surely he was a host for his party in the Senate. He is now an Attorney-General, and a Cabinet councillor as well as counsel for the Cabinet. The public of all parties have great confidence in him, and he stands fair for higher promotion. It is so seldom that we hear in Congress a classical style of speaking that a man who has any regard for the advancement of taste admires such a speaker. He is said to be a lover of literature, and it is to be hoped that in his high office he will advise the President to recommend its protection and encouragement. The President and heads of departments can do much for literature and science if they feel disposed to do it. A few months after his return from Washington City, on leaving the Cabinet, Mr. Berrien was an invited guest at a public dinner given at Milledgeville, in November, 1831, as a testimony of respect to Gov. Gilmer, who had failed in his re-election to the Executive. Among the sentiments offered was the following : — John Macpherson Berrien: — ^We hail with pleasure his return to Georgia. His services in Congress, in the Cabinet of the United States, and in the Free Trade Convention, are viewed with grateful feelings by his fellow-citizens of this State. In responding, he entertained the large company in a speech nearly half an hour, in his best style, both as to composition and delivery. He did ample justice to the policy of President Jackson, saying that of foreign powers he demanded nothing more than justice, and would accept nothing less. He eulogized the Presi- dent as the friend of Georgia, firm in his course for the removal of the Indians ; but when the Chief-Magistrate of the Republic sought to prescribe rules and to select associates for the families of his Cabinet, he scorned the dictation. The author never heard Mr. Berrien speak until that dinner. There was a magic in the tones of his voice which never before captivated his ear. He heard him on several occasions afterwards with equal delight, — once in the Circuit Court of the United States, before Judges Johnson and Cuyler, in 1833, in a large ejectment cause.* * Winn 17. Patterson, 9 Peters's Reports, 663. JOror MACPHERSON BERRIEN. 53 The fame of Mr. Berrien as a profound jurist and brilliant advocate (two characters rarely united) secured him about as much professional employment as he desired, at home, as trell as in the adjoining States, and in the Supreme Court at Washington. He was very laborious, and never appeared in a cause without full preparation. He has been known to pass the whole night in searching up authorities and arranging for the trial of the next day. In criminal cases he seldom failed of an acquittal, however complicated the facts. His arguments were conclusive. He stood by unanimous consent at the head of his profession in Georgia, if not in the entire South. Finding it necessary to move on the subject, the Legislature of Georgia, in 1838, passed the following resolution : — Resolved, That his Excellency the Governor be, and he is hereby, requested to appoint forthwith three commissioners, whose duty it shall be to take the whole subject of State Finance in hand, arrange, digest, and report, at the earliest possible day of the next session of the Legisla- ture, a system of finance for the State, which, calling into action all her resoarces, shall afford ample and sofficient means to sustain, as in the present age they should be sustained, the great interests of Public Educa- tion and Internal Improvement. Gov. Gilmer accordingly appointed Judge Berrien, Hon. W. W. Holt, and Hon. A. H. Chappell, to execute the resolution. The report of sixty-four printed pages, made at the next session, is very elaborate and comprehensive. It is a document evincing great sagacity in the details, from which a few passages are selected. The introductory part is known to be from the pen of Mr. Berrien : it bears the evidence. He of course assisted in other portions. In unfolding the duty and resources of the State, the report says : — A State possessing an extent of territory which stretches from the seaboard to the mountains, wide-spreading on eveiy side ; whose easy and gentle ascent is free from those irregularities of surface which elsewhere obstruct the progress of interior communications ; watered by noble rivers which are never sealed by the frosts of winter, and whose estuaries form safe and commodions harbors; possessing, too, a variety of soil and climate which admirably fit it for the production of all that is useful to man ; — such a State, the cherished abode of a free, enlightened, and enterprising people, is called to the consideration of the high duties which, in the providence of God, are devolved upon her. She is called to this consideration, moreover, at an epoch in the world's history which has no parallel in the annals of time ; when science, direct- ing all its energies to purposes of practical utility, has advanced with unexampled rapidity in all those arte which minister to the substantial enjoyment of man ; when the other nations of the world, and the other 54 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. States of this Confederacy, are eagerly pressing forward to grasp the bril- liant prize which is presented to their view ; when, amid the_ universal and cheering cry of "Onwards ! Onwards!" among nations urging on the cause of internal improvement, to the laggard in the race, momentarily excited by the prospect, but too inert to engage in the struggle, is denied the full enjoyment even of that which has hitherto sufficed to satisfy his desires, — thus illustrating the emphatic denunciation of Holy Writ : — " From him that hath not, even that which he hath shall be taken away from him." And why should Georgia hesitate to nerve herself for the struggle ? Why should she linger in the race ? The voice which issued from the legislative halls, at the close of its last sittings, has been cheered by the responsive acclamations of her people. Kising in the strength of their intellect and in the fervor of their patriotism, contemplating with grate- ful enthusiasm the multiplied resources which the bounty of Providence has bestowed upon them, and animated by the still more growing pros- pects which a near futurity opens to their view, they, too, have joined in the universal acclaim of the nations, and bid you "Grod-speed" in the discharge of your high duties. Why, then, should Georgia hesitate to nerve herself for the struggle ? Why should she linger in the race ? It is not because her chosen Repre- sentatives are careless of the high interests which a free and confiding people have intrusted to their patriotism, to their wisdom, to their ceaseless vigilance. Is it because the prize is valueless ? To sustain, as in the present age they ought to be sustained, the great interests of Public Education and Internal Improvement, is the object of your labors. Of Public Education ' The improvement of the mind ; the cultivation of science and the arts; the diffusion of knowledge; the universal instruction of a whole people. Of Internal Improvement ! Improving our navigable rivers ; connect- ing them by canals ; traversing the State with railroads ; uniting them to the termini of similar communications in the adjacent States of Tennessee and Alabama ; furnishing means for the cheap and rapid transportation of our produce to market ; carrying home to every man's door the supplies of the great Southwest, and those of foreign nations from our Atlantic border ; bringing the mountains and the seaboard in such close proximity that the waves of the ocean may, almost without a figure, be said to wash their base; and, finally, scaling those mountain-heights, and along the line of similar improvements in other States, establishing our communica- tions with the great river of the West ; thus making friends of those who were strangers to each other, and brethren of those who had looked upon each other with distrust. No ! with such objects in view, it cannot be that the prize is deemed valueless. It is, indeed, of inestimable value. Is it attainable ? Does Georgia possess the means to accomplish so great an enterprise ? Are her resources adequate to the expenditure which it will necessarily involve ? This is, in truth, the only inquiry. The duty of answering it, according to the best information they can command, has devolved upon the undersigned. Fully sensible of the magnitude of the subject, and of their inability to meet the expectations of your honorable body, they, nevertheless, invite your attention to this interesting inquiry. Our attention is first to be directed to an examination of the actual JOHN MACPHEESON BERKIEN. 55 resources of the State. These may be said to consist, or rather (in part) to have consisted, — 1. Of the Public Lands. 2. Of Taxes. 3. Of the Funds of the State in the Central Bank. Thus far the language of the report is copied, as showing the earnest and hopeful visions of Judge Berrien twenty years ago, which he lived to see realized in a considerable measure. Further items in the report will be condensed. The quantity of land in Georgia was shown by two methods, — from surveys of record, and from the tax-digests in the Comptrol- ler's oflSee. The comparatively small diflference between the two shows the accuracy with which tax-returns are made by the receivers in the several counties : — Reported by Surveyor-General acres 35,515,526 Reported by Comptroller taxed " 35,866,336 Excess of taxation 350,810 But it appears from another return of the Surveyor-General that the State has granted more than either of these amounts of land ; consequently the income from grants has entirely ceased. The tax system is next examined, and sundry objections to it urged. Estimating the land at $3 per acre, and slaves at §400 each, the value of §200,000,000 of property is connected with agriculture in Georgia, which paid a tax of only §53,450 ; while the capital employed in commerce at the same time was but §18,304,148, upon which was assessed §28,600. The classification of certain lands is noticed as onerous. The same tax paid on all slaves under sixty years, — mechanics worth from §2000 to §3000 paying no more than a common field-hand, and no more than the merchant paid on each §100 of his stock in trade. This inequality is condemned in the report. After the Central Bank was esta- blished, and its profits supposed to be sufficient to support the State Government, the general tax was relinquished in 1835. For 1834 the tax-account stood thus : — Amount of tax returned as due §56,024 36 Amount of tax paid into the Treasury 39,192 18 Lost in commissions, insolvents, and defaulters §16,832 18 The statistics of the Central Bank are given at considerable length in the report, showing that when the bank was first organ- ized, January 29, 1829, it had specie and cash funds to the amount of §513,101 77 ; and on the 2d of November, 1829, out of 56 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. $355,597 90 due the State in bonds and notes at the time the bank went into operation, the sum of $117,340 92 had been con- verted into accommodation-paper running in the bank, — making in all a fund for discounting equal to $630,340 69. For the ten years from 1829 to 1838 inclusive, a table is submitted in the report, exhibiting the discounts and profits for each year, all summed up as follows : — The aforegoing statement shows that for the ten years which it em- braces, the sum total of the discounts of the bank was $11,975,985 73, and that the sum total of the profits for that time was $565,134 21. To determine the rate of profit which these results show to have been made on the capital employed by the bank, it must be borne in mind that the discounts are based on capital only, and represent nothing but capital ; and that consequently, whatever amount of discounted paper appears at any time to have been held by the bank, it is certain that an equal amount of capital had come to the hands of the bank and was used in those discounts. Then, inasmuch as all the discounts for ten years amounted to $11,9.75,985 73, which makes an average for each year of $1,197,598 57, it follows that the average amount of the State's moneyed capital which the bank each year employed in discounts was also the sum of $1,197,598 57. And the average profit thereon for each year was $56,513 42, which is equal to an interest of 4 7-10th8 per cent, per annum. Whether this be a good or a bad business for the State, in a mere finan- cial view of the matter, depends on the question whether the State might not, with as much ease and as little peril, have realized a better profit in some other known mode of employing the public money. And here the aforesaid results of her investments in the stocks of certain of our joint- stock banking companies are at hand, and furnish a decisive answer. For it has already been shown that on her capital of $1,005,000 vested in those banks she has realized, in the ten years just above mentioned, a clear profit of $745,860 92, which gives an average for each year of $74,586 09, and is equal to an interest of 7 4-lOths per cent, per annum on the whole capital thus invested. If the capital employed by the Central Bank during these same ten years had yielded an equal rate of profit, to wit, an interest of 7 4— lOths per cent, instead of an interest of 4 7-lOths per cent., then the sum total of its profits for that time would have been $886,222 50, instead of $565,134 21, whereby the State would have been gainer to the amount of $82 1,088 29 ; which sum must consequently be set down as so much loss in ten years, chargeable to the policy of having discarded the old and well-tried system of investing in ordinary bank-stocks for the new and questionable experiment of the Central Bank. The report discusses the policy of loans for other than commer- cial purposes, the bearing of certain fiscal measures, the credit system, exchanges, the abuse of accommodation-paper, and the various channels through which the public prosperity is afiiected by the circulation of money on proper equivalents. The views set forth in the report are worthy to rank high in the best system of JOHN MACPHERSON BEEEIEN. 57 political economy. The analysis of the financial resources and obligations of Georgia is a masterly labor. The want of space alone forbids more copious extracts. Those introduced will show the character of the whole, — deep, sifting, and logical. Perhaps no commission of the kind ever acquitted itself with more credit. The subject of Education — the aid of the State in time past, and what ought to be done to secure intelligence among the masses — is pressed with a truly bold and discriminating statesmanship. The estimates of every kind on which to base a judicious system of taxation to support internal improvement, to establish public schools, and to work out a proud destiny for Georgia through her legislation, are furnished in the report. In many strong passages the pen of Col. Chappell is distinctly recognised. The same may be said in reference to Judge Holt, who prepared many tables and calculations, with the necessary comments, all showing the vigor and grasp of his mind. The report is indeed a valuable document, which the author presumes is out of print, except a few copies accidentally preserved. Merely for reference, a further extract is given : — The ordinary expenses of the Grovemment for the last year, and the average of those expenses since the year 1828, as these appear in the report of the Treasurer, have been taken as the data from whence to cal- culate their probable annual amonnt in future. They have been considered as embraced under the following heads : — Civil Establishment, Printing, Contingent Fund, Military Disbursements, Redemption of Public Debt, Penitentiary, and Presidents' and Speakers' warrants. These expenses for the year 1838 were as follows : — For Civil Establishment ?38,928 61 Printing 19,824 85 Contingent Fund 15,867 16 Military Disbursements 4,895 30 Redemption of Pubhc Debt 3,372 81 Penitentiary 15,000 00 Presidents' and Speakers' Warrants 88,906 80 Ordinary expenses for 1838 8186,795 58 The average of the same expenses since 1828 is as follows : — For Civil EstabUshment ?38,869 47 Printing 14,355 79 Contingent Fund 18,058 31 Military Disbursements 3,077 63 Redemption of Public Debt 787 55 Penitentiary 7,386 00 Presidents' and Speakers' Warrants 67,751 58 Average for ten years $148,286 33 68 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. On the basis furnished by these two exhibits, and assuming that the Legislature will make such reductions as are in its power, we have con- sidered that the ordinary annual expenses of the Government may be esti- mated at $150,000. In about sixteen years from the date of the Commissioners' report, the expenses of the Government were thus estimated by John B. Trippe, Esq., State Treasurer, in his report to the Legis- lature of October 20, 1855 :— Estimated Expenses for 1856. Payment of Legislature and officers $150,000 00 Civil Establishment 52,000 00 Contingent Fund 15,000 00 Deaf and Dumb 8,000 00 Academy for Blind 2,500 00 Provisions for Penitentiary 2,500 00 Military Fund 1,000 00 Military Storekeeper 450 00 Military Institute 2,000 00 Lunatic Asylum 20,000 00 Penitentiary Inspector 500 00 Chaplain Penitentiary 150 00 Printing Fund 18,000 00 Interest on Public Debt 160,000 00 Reduction Public Debt 30,000 00 Miscellaneous Appropriations 10,000 00 Total expenses for 1856 $472,100 00 The expenses for 1857 are estimated by the Treasurer at $284,100 00, there being no session of the Legislature to provide for this year, and the Printing Fund being about $10,000 less on that account. Since 1838, several items have been added to the ordinary expenses of the Government, among which may be men- tioned provision for the Deaf and Dumb, Lunatic Asylum, the Blind, Military Institute, &c. The estimated expenses for 1856 and 1857 amount to $756,200 00, in which the following objects are included, not to be found on the list in 1838 : — ESTIMATES. 1856. 1857. Deaf and Dumb $8,000 00 $8,000 00 Academy for Blind 2,500 00 2,500 00 Military Institute 2,000 00 2,000 00 Lunatic Asylum 20,000 00 20,000 00 Interest on Public Debt.... 160,000 00 160,000 00 Reduction Public Debt 30,000 00 16,000 00 New charges on Treasury $222,500 00 $208,500 00 JOHN MACPHBRSON BERKIEN. 59 Deduct these two sums, §431,000 from $756,200, and there will remain $325,200 as the expenses of the Government for two years, equal to §162,600 per annum, very little more than the commis- sioners stated in 1839 to be necessary. This excess of §12,600 may be accounted for by the Supreme Court and several judicial circuits which have been formed since, increasing the ordinary expenses of the Government. It is at least a remarkable coinci- dence that the average is so nearly the same. The estimated receipts into the Treasury for 1856 are thus stated by Mr. Trippe : — General Tax for 1856 §400,000 00 Special Tax on Bank Stock 23,000 00 « « Kailroads 6,500 00 « " Agencies of Foreign Banks 300 00 Miscellaneous Resources 1,500 00 Total estimate for 1856 §431,300 00 These tables have been drawn into the memoir of Judge Berrien merely to bear out the calculations of the Financial Committee of which he was chairman in 1839. And here the author takes occasion to go back a few years in the narrative, so as to li&tice the part which Judge Berrien acted in the Anti-Tariff Convention at Milledgeville, in November, 1832. A list of the delegates and a sketch of the proceedings of that body are given elsewhere in this volume.* It may be truly said that it was a collection of talented men, — such as Forsyth, Gilmer, W. Gumming, J. P. King, Torrance, S. Rockwell, Clayton, Dawson, T. Haynes, T. Spalding, W. H. Underwood, H. Warner, H. Holt, S.W.Flournoy, J.C.Alford, A.Cuthbert, R.L. Gamble, J.G.Park, D. A. Reese, T. "W. Harris, R. A. Beall, Wiley Williams, and the "Old Constitution," Gen. David Blackshear, and others more or less known to the public. Mr. Berrien appeared as a delegate from Monroe county. His was the second name on the Committee of Twenty-one, General Blackshear being the chairman. On the second day, Mr. Forsyth offered a preliminary resolution on which sprung up unexpectedly a long and brilliant discussion. Mr. Berrien came prepared to examine the Tariff, and the power of the Federal Government to discriminate for protection, and on that question he was a match for any man. But Mr. Forsyth led off in another direction, * Memoir of B. A. Beall. 60 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. requiring the delegates to show their authority, in rigid form, to speak in the name of the people, and, if they refused, he would not participate in their deliberations. On the fourth day a vote was taken on the amendment proposed by Mr. Berrien, which was in efifect the rejection of Mr. Forsyth's resolution, — ^Yeas, 63 ; Nays, 56. When the result was announced by the presiding officer, Mr. Forsyth arose and made a few remarks explanatory of his course ; then placed on the clerk's table a paper signed by himself and about fifty other delegates who retired with him from the hall, protesting against the action of the majority. To give the particu- lars of this scene and of the debates of the Convention would be only to repeat what may be seen under another head. The remaining delegates proceeded with their business as though nothing had happened. But the star of the Convention, on which all eyes turned with rapture, had disappeared in Mr. Forsyth. The greater part of those who heard him on that occasion, inclu- ding delegates and the large throng of spectators, declared that they had never listened to genuine eloquence before. He soared above all competition. Fresh from the Senate of the United States, he wore his laurels, gathered in that arena by contests with Calhoun, Clay, and Webster, with the air of a victor. He was, indeed, perfection as an orator. In skirmishing, he was admitted to have no rival in the Union, if in the world. Afterwards, his ability was tested and his fame greatly increased by his leadership in the defence of President Jackson when he was assailed in the Senate for the removal of the public deposits from the United States Bank in 1833. Yet the void in the Convention soon closed up, and the measures for which it assembled were discussed freely, the speakers often differing in their views, though in the main harmonious. At the request of the chairman, the Report of the Committee of Twenty-one was prepared by Mr. Berrien, who read it to the Con- vention. The author was in the gallery at the time, and well remembers the delight it afforded to all present, as much by the manner of the reading as the merits of the paper itself. For the purposes of history, and as containing the constitu- tional argument, several of the resolutions are here inserted from the report : — 7. That the act laying duties on imports, passed in July, 1832, as well as the several acts of which that act is emendatwry, in so far as it tran- scends the purposes of revenue, and is intended to operate, and does JOHN MACPHERSON BERRIEN. 61 operate, substantively for the protection of manufactures, is an exercise of powers not granted by the Constitution, but a plain and palpable viola- tion of the true intent, meaning, and spirit thereof; that the said acts cannot be justified under the power of regulating commerce with foreign nations, since to regulate is not to destroy; and the principle of a substantive protection to domestic manufactures assumes, and in some instances exerts, the power of imposing a duty which efiiectually prohibits the importation of foreign fabrics of like kind with those which are thus protected, and to this extent destroys foreign commerce instead of regu- lating it. That they cannot be supported under the power to levy and collect duties, since this power was given solely for the purpose of en- abling the Government to raise a revenue which should be adequate to its wants ; and the amount of revenue which is raised by these protective duties very far exceeds the legitimate wants of the Government; and that the attempt to vindicate the exercise of a power to impose a burden on the labor and industry of one portion of the people of the United States for the benefit of another portion of the same people, under the power to pro- vide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States, is even more alarming than the direct results of the system itself, because that is to ascribe to Congress the power to do whatever in their judgment may conduce to the common defence and general welfare, and thus to invest the National Legislature with unlimited (because merely discretion- ary) power over the rights and liberties of the people of Georgia. 8. That the people of Georgia are sincerely attached to the Federal Constitution, and to the Union of the States which it creates and guaran- tees ; that they consider it as a precious inheritance received from their fathers which it is the duty of patriotism to maintain and defend, and esti- mate it above all price, save that of liberty ; that they are ready to peril their fortunes and their lives in its defence, and would deeply deplore its dissolution, as an event alike inauspicious to themselves and to the cause of civil liberty throughout the world. That, actuated by these feelings, and even amid the difficulties which beset them, not despairing of the Repub- lic, they will still persevere in the use of every proper and efficient means for the peaceful adjustment of this unhappy controversy which may be within their power as one of the sovereign members of this Confederacy, or which may result from consultation and conference with their sister States having a common interest with them in this matter. That, taking the payment of the national debt as the period after which the present tariflF of duties, so far as it transcends the purposes of revenue and is designed for the protection of domestic manufactures, can find no plausible pretext in our constitutional charter, they are willing to wait until Congress shall have full time deliberately to determine whether they will reduce and equalize the duties on foreign imports, so as to bring the income of the Government within the limits of revenue, and to collect the contributions of our citizens on the principles of just taxation. That, having regard to the interests of those whose capita has been invested in manufactures during the progress of that course of legislation of which they complain, they are willing that the reduction and equalization of duties which they ask should be prospective and gradual, and, fearfully admonished as they have been by experience of the fallacy of their past hopes for relief from the evils under which they suffer, they will still look to the justice and patriotism of their brethren of the manufacturing States. 9. That the people of Georgia cannot submit to the permanent prot«c- 62 BENCH AND BAE OF GEOKGIA. tion of domestic manufactures by duties imposed for that purpose on tlie importation of foreign manufactures, and especially on such as are among the necessaries of life; that they cannot submit to the adoption of the principle on which such duties are imposed, as a permanent principle of Federal policy, but will feci bound to resist the same by the exercise of all their rights as one of the sovereign members of this Confederacy, and by consultation and concert with their sister States having like interest with themselves, and disposed to unite with them in resistance to this principle. 10. That it be respectfully recommended to the several Southern States having a common interest with us in the removal of the grievances ■under which we labor from the protective system, to assemble in Conven- tion by delegates from the respective States, corresponding to the number of their Senators and Kepresentatives in Congress, to confer together on the subject of their grievances, and to recommend to the people of their respective States such measures as may best conduce to the removal of the same ; and that the time and place of such meeting be determined by correspondence between the delegates elected to said Convention. This report was adopted by a vote of 64 yeas, 6 nays. The latter were Messrs. Clifton, Flournoy, Guerry, Holt, Lewis, of Burke, and Peabody. On motion of Mr. Berrien, it was Resolved, That a committee be appointed, to consist of five persons, whose duty it shall be to prepare an address to the people of Georgia, illustrating the objects and proceedings of this Convention, which shall be attached to the journal of the said proceedings. Whereupon the presi- dent appointed Messrs. Berrien, Clayton, Gordon, of Putnam, Beall, of Bibb, and Torrance, that committee. The address came forth under the signatures of the Committee, dated November 21, 1832, from which an extract is given, pointing out the inequality of the protective system : — By the provisions of the Tariff Act of 1832, a principle of taxation is affirmed which imposes burdens on articles of necessary consumption, while those of luxury, and those materials used in manufacturing, such as dye-stuffs, &c., are, with a few unimportant exceptions, declared to be free of duty. The effect of this unwarrantable discrimination is to exempt CNPEOTECTED articles entirely from taxation, and to throw all the burden upon the PROTECTED articles, such as iron, salt, sugar, woollen and cotton fabrics, &c. These are articles of necessary consumption at the South, the duties upon which in many instances amount to an entire prohibition. The spirit which characterized the majority in Congress in the adoption of this odious act cannot, perhaps, be better illustrated than in the rejection by the majority in the Senate of all propositions tending to the reduction of the duties to the wants of the Government, or limiting those imposed to a certain definite amount. A distinguished Senator from the South, during the discussion of the act of 1832 in the Senate, submitted to that body four distinct propositions. The first was an amendment to Mr. Clay's resolution, by which amendment it was proposed "to bring down the duties gradually to the revenue standard, adjusting them on the protected JOHN JIACPHERSON BERRIEN. 63 and unprotected articles, on principles of perfect equality." This propo- gition, fair and honorable in its terms, in every respect reasonable in its operation, was treated by the majority "as a scheme to destroy the manu- facturers, and as pledging; Congress to an ultimate abandonment of the protecting system, which it was declared had become the settled policy of the country." Immediate reduction was termed "sudden destruction to the manufacturers;" gradual reduction was called "slow poison." The proposition was rejected. To the clause in the bill imposing a duty of 16 cents a yard upon flannels, the same distinguished Senator proposed to add a proviso " that the duty should in no case exceed fifty pee cent." The duty of 16 cents a yard on coarse flannels used by the poor would be equal to 160 per cent., while on the finest of that article it would amount to only 32 per cent. Yet this proviso was rejected. The reason alleged for this rejection was that 50 per cent, would not be an adequate protection to the domestic manufacturer of flannels. Another proposition was made : — " to strike out the minimums on cottons." This also was rejected ; and this "fraudulent device" was retained in the acts by which an article costing .5 cents is to be deemed to have cost 30 cents, and to pay a duty as having actually cost 30 cents. This was done, too, in the face of a distinct admis- sion of the friends of the manufacturers of coarse cottons that they did not at present require protection. But the majority, in the plenitude of their power, thought it would be wise to "keep the fences up by which foreign competition would be excluded." The fourth and last proposition made by the Southern Senator was that a clause should be added to the end of the act, declaring " that the duties imposed by it should in no CASE exceed one HUNDRED PER CENT.;" yet this proposition shared the same fate of all the previous ones : it was rejected. Yes, a majority in the Senate, secure of their power, calculating on the deceptive features of the act, and relying upon a want of unanimity among the Southern people, for the final triumph of the protective system, rejected a proviso which would have limited the maximum of duties to 100 per cent. People of Georgia ! the rejection of these propositions speaks a language not to be mistaken, the direct tendency of which is to enslave you, — ^to render you tributary to the North. This conduct of the majority evinces but too clearly a determination to maintain the protective principle invio- late, regardless of the cost and reckless of the consequences. It will be seen from the spirit of the Convention that the very scale of reduction established by the compromise in a few months afterwards was suggested by the Committee, if not in express terms, at least in principle. The South Carolina Ordi- nance of Nullification was passed on the 24th day of November, 1832, among the signers of which was Chancellor Harper, who, with his Union colleague, Hon. David Johnson, but a few days before occupied a seat by special invitation in the Convention at Milledgeville. These scraps of the day are collected here as part of an exciting movement in which were enlisted the great minds of the age. The Legislature of Georgia, in 1840, elected Judge Berrien a 64 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. Senator in Congress for a term of six years from 4th March, 1841, at which time he took his seat, to advise on the nominations by President Harrison of his Cabinet and other officers of the Govern- ment. He took an active part in the leading measures of the extra session of Congress of that year, supporting the policy of the Whigs with that high order of abilities which had been so long accorded to him by the public voice. It is not intended here to follow up his votes, or even to refer to all the discussions in which he participated. He was uniformly heard with pleasure, and his opinions commanded the respect of all parties. After the passage of the bankrupt law, there was a very strong feeling of dissatisfaction evinced by the public, and a bill was introduced for its repeal. On the 26th of January, 1842, Mr. Berrien made a speech of great power, maintaining the constitutionality and expediency of the law. He analyzed the relations of debtor and creditor, and the bankrupt systems of other countries, showing them to be necessary to the interests of commerce, as well as just to individuals. In com- paring the bankrupt feature with State insolvent regulations, he thus expressed himself: — Look now at the condition of the bankrupt and insolvent, when the respective processes against them are closed, and say which is likely to prove the better and more upright citizen. The bankrupt has surrendered his all : he is poor, — nay, destitute, penniless ; but Tie is free. Ay, there is the charm. He is really, truly free. It is not merely the poor privi- lege of locomotion which is accorded to him. His hands are unshackled. The energies of his mind are unfettered. He is free to exert them for the benefit of those whom nature and affection have endeared to him. His recovered freedom is his stimulus. The lesson of experience, which adversity has taught him, is his safeguard. The almost utter impractica- bility of receiving a second time the boon which has been once accorded to him is his voice of warning. Thus stimulated, thus guarded, thus warned, he enters upon his new career. If in this world of trial, which we have divested of its original beauty and loveliness, any man may be delivered from temptation, or enabled to resist it, by merely human means, this man is secure. The path of duty, of uprightness, of honesty, which it is the best interest of all to pursue, is that from which he is withont any conceivable motive to wander. And the insolvent, Mr. President, — ^what is his condition ? He too has surrendered his all, — at least, all which he dare openly claim : and for what ? To purchase exemption from imprisonment, or the privilege of departing beyond prison-bounds. He breathes the free air of heaven, but not as a free man. He is still the " doomed slave" of his creditor. The fruits of his labor belong to that creditor, and can only be withheld from him by fraud. The necessities of a helpless family appeal to him. The eagle eye of his creditor is upon him. He looks upon that creditor as his enemy. If he be merciless, he is indeed his enemy, — the enemy of those who are dearer to him than life, whom he is bound to protect even at the sacrifice of life itself What then ? As an enemy, he fences himself JOHN MACPHEKSON BERRIEN. 65 against that creditor. He resorts to fraudulent conveyances, to secret trusts, to a regular ' system of habitual deception, and his children, into whose young minds it would have been, under more propitious circum- stances, his grateful task to have instilled the lessons of virtue, are trained up under the blighting influence of that system of concealment to which they are indebted for the comforts and conveniences of life. Such is the actual condition of multitudes, under the operation of the State insolvent law. As ctainnan of the Judiciary Committee, to whom were referred the Senate and House bills to repeal the bankrupt law, and nume- rous petitions, and sundry legislative resolutions, and other papers, relating to the subject Mr. Berrien made a report to the Senate, February 3, 1843, embodying the opinions and statements of Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, Judges of the District Courts of the United States, and other officers of those courts, touching the practical operation of the bankrupt law, its benefits and evils. The report* consists of about thirty pages, from which the following is an extract : — The bankrupt law has now presented its worst aspect. It has passed the fiery ordeal of public opinion, exhibiting all its faults in the emptiness of the inventions which have been returned to the scrutinizing gaze of the public. Hitherto its operation has been chiefly at the expense of the creditor, if indeed the securities which he held were not already valueless at the date of the act. Let us not forget that this is owing to our own long-continued neglect to fulfil onr constitutional duty by the establish- ment of a uniform system of bankruptcy. If sufi'ered to remain on the statute-book, a new era will commence. The mass of insolvencies which had been accumulating for years, afibrding, under the operation of the bankrupt law, little or no return of assets for distribution, has now been disposed of, either by the direct operations of the law or by compromises which it has induced. Hereafter it will afibrd to the creditor the means of preventing the recurrence of this state of things, will enable him to stay the downward progress of his failing debtor before the desperate plunges to which a man in such circumstances is too strongly tempted shall have involved him in hopeless ruin, and will insure to the creditor a fund for distribution far greater than can be obtained under the opera- tion of State insolvent laws. The fact will be manifested by considering the different results which are produced by the bankrupt law in England, and by the insolvent systems of the different States which have prevailed among us. With these facts in view, the committee believe it to be their duty to recommend to the Senate the adoption of a bankrupt law, adapted to the commercial exigencies of the community, and calculated to form a part of the permanent jurisprudence of the country. The salutary influence of such a law will be manifested, — 1st. By the prevention of undue credit, since, under its operation, the debtor may be forced into bankruptcy, by which he must surrender * See Senate Doc. No. 121, 27th Congress, 3d Session. Vol. I.— 5 66 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. all tiat lie possesses, and even then be dependent on the assent of a luajority of his creditors for the allowance of his discharge, with the pre- monition that such discharge will ever after preclude him from receiving similar relief, unless, in the event of his insolvency, his estate is able to pay seventy-five per cent. 2d. By preventing partial assignments, by which a few preferred creditors^ often selected from among those who mainly contributed to enable the failing debtor to hold out a false credit to the community, are allowed to appropriate his estate exclusively to themselves. 3d. By substituting one uniform rule — the great and equitable rule that equality is equity — to the conflict bankrupt and insolvent laws of the several States, and thus insuring a fair and equal dividend of the estate of a failing debtor among all his creditors. 4th. By arming the creditor with a power to force a failing debtor to go into liquidation before his assets are wasted by the desperate specula- tions to which men in such circumstances are generally tempted. The report shows the number and classification of petitioners to Congress relative to the bankrupt law. At the session in 1842 the number is thus stated : — Asking /or a repeal of the bankrupt act 2,133 Against repeal 42,169 Asking for a modification 1,206 For a modification or repeal 4,343 For & postponement 447 Resolutions passed the Legislatures of the States of Connecti- cut, Maine, and Mississippi, for a repeal. During the session in 1843 i?he account stood thus : — For immediate repeal 3,107 Opposed toihe repeal 6,495 The States of Vermont and Ohio passed resolutions in favor of the repeal. It is only an act of justice to both the distinguished orators to remark here that, immediately after Mr. Berrien had finished his speech in support of the bankrupt law, Mr. Clay advanced to him in the Senate and shook him cordially by the hand, thanking him for his eloquent and touching appeal in behalf of a large class of unfortunate yet worthy fellow-citizens, who had fallen by the casualties of trade. It was a noble tribute from a noble source, and should endear the memories of Clay and Berrien to all who revere public benefactors. For his course on the bankrupt bill, and for his support of the nomination of Mr. Everett as Minister to England, of a national bank, the Land Distribution bill, and other Whig measures of the extra session of Congress in 1841, Mr. Berrien incurred the dis- approbation of the Legislature of Georgia, which body, at the JOHN MACPHBRSON BERRIEN. 67 session of 1841, passed resolutions of censure. The majority happened to be Democrats, who took that occasion to embarrass him and to promulgate their policy. He was at the same time instructed to reverse his votes on all those questions. The year following, the same majority again resolved that Mr. Berrien was not representing the sentiments of the people of Georgia, and accordingly withdrew their confidence, refusing to have any com- munication with him. He was not officially notified of this latter action until after the adjournment of the Legislature, and was therefore deprived of the opportunity of vindicating his conduct. He published an address to the people of Georgia, in which he reviewed the measures of Congress, the state of parties, and the doctrine of legislative instructions, the latter of which, as applied to him, he pronounced a usurpation. At the State election in 1843 (the first of biennial sessions) the Whigs obtained an ascendency in the Legislature, and de- clared by resolutions, in the warmest terms, that Mr. Berrien was a faithful Senator, alike distinguished for ability and patriotism, and that the people of Georgia felt a just pride in his character and public services. This is the substance, and it was alike gratify- ing and proper to Mr. Berrien, who continued to discharge his public duties in the Senate. The address of Mr. Berrien to the people of Georgia called forth a letter from Judge Story, in which he said, "Your argu- ment upon what is called ' the right of instruction' is exceedingly cogent, and, I think, unanswerable. If ever my work on the Con- stitution shall reach another edition, I intend to extract the pas- sage and use it in that work. I have laid aside the newspaper for this purpose among my choice collections." In 1844 Mr. Berrien was a delegate from Georgia in the Con- vention at Baltimore which nominated Mr. Clay for the Presi- dency. He was appointed chairman of the committee to commu- nicate the action of that body to Mr. Clay, which he did as follows : — Baitimoke, May 1, 1844. SiE : — The grateful office of announcing to you the result of the de- liberations of the National AVhig Convention, this day assembled at this place for the selection of a candidate for the office of President of the United States at the approaching election, has been by that Convention assigned to us. We perform it by communicating to you the accompanying copy of a resolution adopted unanimously and by acclamation by that body, and beg to add to it the expression of our earnest hope that the wish of your as- sembled fellow-citizens, in which " all with one voice" have united, and 68 BENCH AND BAK OF GEORGIA. in which their personal feelings, and, as they believe, the best interests of this great people, are involved, may meet your prompt and cheerful acquiescence. We have the honor to be, very respectfully, your fellow-oitizens, John Macpheeson Berrien, J. Burnet, Erastus Root, Abbott Lawrence, Hon. Henry Clay. William 8. Archer. Washington, May 2, 1844. Gentlemen : — I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter, dated yesterday at Baltimore, communicating my nomination, by the National Whig Convention there assembled, to the people of the United States as a candidate for the office of President of the United States. Confidently believing that this nomination is in conformity with the desire of a majority of the people of the United States, I accept it from a high sense of duty, and with feelings of profound gratitude. I re- quest you, gentlemen, in announcing to the Convention my acceptance of the nomination, to express the very great satisfaction I derive from the unanimity with which it has been made. I have the honor to be, with the highest respect, faithfully your friend and fellow-citizen, H. Clay. Messrs. John Maopherson Berrien, Erastus Root, J. Burnet, Abbott Lawrence, and William S. Archer. After his re-election to the Senate in 1840, and becoming more fully identified with the policy of the Whigs, Mr. Berrien so far modified his opinions on the Tariff as to give incidental protection to home manufactures. He was present at a mass meeting of the Whigs of Massachusetts, on Boston Common, in September, 1844, and, by special invitation, addressed the people at Marlborough Chapel, Boston, on the night of 19th September, being introduced to the crowded assemblage by the Hon. Daniel Webster. A por- tion of his speech is here given. After disposing of other topics, Mr. Berrien said : — I repeat it, fellow-citizens, the great question between us and our oppo- nents on this subject is, — Shall we cherish the industry of our own people, or of those who are alien from our country, our institutions, our interests, and our affections ? Shall we stimulate the productive 'energies of our countrymen, or suffer them to languish in hopeless inactivity ? Shall we secure to the laboring classes among us a fair reward for their honest industry, — the means of obtaining a comfortable subsistence for themselves and their families, wherewith to rear and educate their chil- dren and to fit them for the discharge of their duties as American citi- zens ? Shall we thus impart to that valuable portion of our people the high sense of personal independence which will add to our national strength, or, blindly neglecting their interests and our own, shall we suffer them to sink down to the condition of the pauper-laborers of Europe '! JOHN MACPHERSON BERRIEN. 69 Shall this government be administered for the benefit of our own people, or the subjects of a foreign land ? Are we willing to come back to the system of colonial vassalage, with the broken fetters of which our fathers battled for freedom, or are we honestly proud of our independence and resolutely determined to main- tain and transmit it to our children ? Disguise it as we may, to these issues it must come at last. We may be lulled into security. Yielding to party feelings, we may blindly fol- low in the steps of party leaders, and sacrifice our own best interests at their dictation. But I overrate the intelligence of my countrymen if they can be thus deluded. I mistake their character if they will not spurn the demagogue who would seek thus to mislead them. No, fellow- citizens ! Realizing the magnitude of the interests which are involved in this controversy, remembering that "the price of liberty is eternal vigilance," you will bring to its decision the intelligence and manly firm- ness which should characterize American freemen. Forgive the momen- tary egotism : I am a Southern man, wholly unconnected with manufac- tures or with stocks of any description, — a Southern planter, depending on the cultivation of the soil and the use of such faculties as God has given me for my own and the support of a numerous family. If it be true (as our opponents contend) that, in protecting our domestic industry, the agricultural and other classes of the community are taxed for the ex- clusive benefit of the manufacturer, mine is the harder lot. When the pocket-nerve of the agriculturist is touched, mine is as liable to vibra- tion as that of another. On such a subject I could not deceive you if I would : that I would not if I could, let the simple statement prove to you. No, fellow-citizens ! I advocate the protection of domestic industry from no merely selfi.sh considerations. Looking to this great question in the large and comprehensive view in which, as it seems to me, it becomes an American statesman to contemplate it, I advocate this system of legis- lation to furnish a home market, to give stability to the currency, to ele- vate the national character, to preserve the public morals, and to draw closer the bond of union which connects us together as one people. Let us pause for a moment to consider these suggestions. The protection of domestic industry tends largely to increase the sum of national wealth. 1. It does this by a division of labor. All experience teaches us that the aggregate product of the labor of any country is increased by such subdivisions. A nation of agriculturists, each of whom should minister to his own wants, should feed and clothe himself and make his own implements of labor, would advance slowly, however genial the climate and fruitful the soil which Providence has assigned to them. It is by diver- sifying the objects of individual pursuit by the skill which is requisite to furnish the necessary exchanges that the a^;regate production is increased. 2. It stimulates industry. The necessity of providing for one's own wants by promptly supplying the wants of others, the increased skill which is acquired, and the consequent ability to add to individual comfort by its industrious exercise, furnish a stimulus to exertion which cannot be found in the infancy of society, when each man endeavors to supply his own wants by the clumsy operations of his own inexperienced hand. It adds largely to the national wealth by the additional value which it imparts to the raw material. We shall look in vain through the pages of history for an example of great national productive labor, which was 70 BENCH AMD BAK OF GEORGIA. employed in producing raw materials, depending upon other nations for the exercise of the skill and industry which were necessary to befit them for the use and enjoyment of man. We may form some idea of the im- portance of this consideration from the following facts : — A bale of cotton of ordinary quality, weighing 450 lbs., is worth, at 7J cents per lb., the sum of 834. If sold in a foreign market, it would add this sum, less the expenses of transportation and charges of sale, to the sum of national wealth. The same bale of cotton manufactured here will produce 400 lbs. of cloth of No. 14 yarn, of which the present market-value would be 24 cents per lb., — 896. In this case the value of the manufactured article is nearly threefold. The sum of 862 would thus be added to the national wealth. 480 lbs. of cotton of fine quality, worth, at 8J cents per lb., the sum of 848, would produce 400 lbs. of cloth of No. 30 yarn, worth 36 cents per lb., or $156. 450 lbs. of sea-island cotton, worth, at 16 cents cents per lb., 872, will make 400 lbs. of No. 80 yarn, worth $1 32 per lb., or 8518. The aggregate value of these three bales of cotton in their raw state is 8142, — in their manufactured state 8759. The increased value imparted to them by the skill and industry of the manufacturer is there- fore 8626. Extend this calculation to the aggregate value of the 400,000 bales of cotton and other raw materials manufactured in this country; compute that value in their raw and in their manufactured state, and some idea may be formed of the sum which is added to the national wealth by the skill, enterprise, and industry of the American manufacturer. The protection of domestic industry results in the establishment of a home market. To the extent to which such a demand can be created, it furnishes a better market even for those articles of produce which are chiefly sold abroad, as any man may satisfy himself who wiU calculate the product of 100 bales of cotton sold here and in the English market at current prices, and invested in English and American manufactures of equal quality. The details are too tedious for an occasion like the present ; and they are already before the reading public in the very able argument of Hon. Mr. Simmons, of Rhode Island, pronounced a few months since in the Senate of the United States. But the importance of a home market is more distinctly felt by the agriculturist, whose products will not bear the expense or delay of trans- portation abroad. It stimulates production by the demand which it creates, and which could not exist without it. Those who reside in the neighborhood of the villages, towns, and cities, which are scattered through our country, find there a demand for various agricultural produce which would otherwise be comparatively valueless, and would not there- fore be produced. Extend your view to the manufacturing establish- ments in the different States. Their operations require various products of the soil. The operatives who labor in them must be fed; and the demand thus occasioned gives an impulse to the agriculture of contiguous districts, necessarily increases production, and thus adds to the wealth of the agricultmist. The protection of domestic industry gives stability to the currency. The specie which is in circulation among us is not adequate to our commercial wants. We require a currency based upon specie, and easily convertible into it, extended in amount as it can be, retaining that quality. JOHN MACPHEESON BERRIEN. 71 So long as we continue to depend on foreign supply for a large proportion of articles of comfort or necessity, the fluctuations of commerce will sub- ject us in a greater degree to the drain of our specie, and the consequent contraction of our circulation, — thus afiecting injuriously various classes of the community. It is only by enlarging our home supply of the chief articles of consumption which we are capable of producing, and keeping our imports within our exports, or our expenditures within our income, that we can prevent the frequent recurrence of these embarrassments. With regard to the Government, the public credit, and other beneficial consequences of the Tariff of 1842, Mr. Berrien thus spoke : — Fellow-citizens ! We have looked at this question in various aspects. There is yet another which is full of ioterest. It is the practical result of the Tariff of 1842 in its operation both upon the Government and the people during the short period of its existence. For a moment consider what was the condition of the Grovernment before this law was passed. Mr. Van Buren, during his brief Presidential career, had exhausted both the ordinary and extraordinary resources of the Government, and, looking to the election which was to determine his right to a second term, feared to recommend the imposition of dutifes, or any other mode of taxation which would replenish the national treasury. Treasury notes constituted its only resource. A Government representing seventeen millions of free- men, and possessed of abundant means, nevertheless paid its debts and met its current expenditures, so far as they were paid and met, hy pro- mises to pay ! He retired from the Executive office and his Cabinet was disbanded, leaving to their successors a large amount of those treasury promises to redeem, and at much larger amount of unliquidated liabilities to provide for. They found the Government not only without resources, but also without credit. Shortly after the accession of the Whig party to power, a bill drawn upon the Treasury, and protested for non-payment, was exhibited in the Senate-Chamber. We sought to provide for the immediate wants of Government by a loan. It was partially accomplished on terms which were not creditable to us as a nation possessed of ample resources, but the acceptance of which was demanded by a regard to the public faith. For the rest, we failed entirely. An agent sent to Europe to procure the residue of the sum required returned without a dollar. We could not go into the money-market and borrow money on terms as advantageous as would be accorded to a responsible private individual. Our treasury notes were below par, and progressively depreciating. Now, why was this ? No one doubted the ability of the Government to meet their engagements. It was their willingness to do so which the conduct of the late administration had drawn into question. See the proof. The Tariff Act of 1842 was passed, and instantly, even before its practical influence could be felt, in the extent in which it is now felt, the whole aspect of affairs was changed. The credit of the Government was restored. Trea- sury notes rose to par, and the stock of the United States has progres- sively advanced until it is now fifteen or sixteen per cent, above par. The Treasury has been replenished, so that at the close of the late financial year, on the 30th of June last, there were about seven millions of dollars subject to the order of the Government, to be applied to the redemption of the public debt, and to meet its current expenses. 72 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. Such has been the operation of the Tariff on the financial condition of the Government, What has been its influence on the condition of indi- viduals let each one who hears me determine for himself by a comparison of his circumstances in 1841 and at the present day. Meantime, it is obvious to all that a new stimulus has been imparted to industry ; that confidence between man and man has been restored ; that all enjoy more largely the comforts and conveniences of life, and that we can look for- ward hopefully to the future unless we are faithless to ourselves and utterly unmindful of the lessons of experience. Fellow-citizens ! We cannot part with a system thus beneficent in its influence upon the Government and upon every class of the people, in all their varied interests, — pecuniary, social, and moral, — unless, as our oppo- nents tell us, we have not the constitutional power to enforce it. I do not propose to detain you by an elaborate discussion of this question. The power was affirmed in the Senate-Chamber by one of your own dis- tinguished Senators, (Mr. Choate,) in an argument which challenges refu- tation ; while the historical view of the question has been recently pre- sented by another distinguished son of Massachusetts, who has so happily presided over our deliberations to-day, (Mr. Webster,) in a manner so clear and comprehensive as can scarcely fail to bring conviction to every unprejudiced mind, — to every man who can absolve himself from a slavish subjection to party. Those noble efforts of intellect and patriotism are in possession of the reading public, and to them I refer you. This somewhat copious extract is given in justice to the public life of Mr. Berrien. No allusion has heretofore been made in this memoir to the leading part he acted in the Convention held at Philadelphia, in September, 1831, adverse to a protective tari£F, The address to the people of the United States on that occasion was from his classic pen. The constitutionality of a tariff for pro- tection was denied, and its other objectionable features pointed out by the hand of a master. That address is not now in the posses- sion of the author, to speak for itself. But it is no disparagement to change opinions when convinced of error ; on the contrary, a man is entitled to praise for his candor. Mr. Calhoun publicly avowed that he did not consider his judgment on public measures so fixed, so grounded on investigation, as to bind him, until the leisure afforded by his Vice-Presidential career from 1825 to 1832 enabled him to review his opinions and work out the true character of the Government. The like privilege may be accorded to Mr. Berrien, who, in his ten years of retirement from the time he resigned his seat in the Cabinet in 1831 until his return to the Senate of the United States in 1841, bad the opportunity of look- ing into the questions of the day with a mind free from sectional bias. The pith of the argument is contained in his Boston speech on the expediency of the Tariff. From some cause, Mr. Berrien felt dissatisfied with the treat- JOHN MACPHERSON BERRIEJf. _ ''^ ment he had received from the Whig party of Georgia ; and early in the session of the Legislature in 1845 he resigned his seat in the Senate. The Whig members consulted together and instantly re-elected him. A committee notified him of the fact. He met his political friends, and made a speech of considerable length, in which he touched upon various topics in vindication of himself and of the party with which he was identified. He answered all the objections, or pretences of objection, which had been made to his public course. That portion of his speech which related to the annexation of Texas is here copied to serve the ends of history : — I voted against the resolution by which it was proposed to incorporate the State of Texas in this Union. In doing so, I expressed the almost unanimous conviction of those who had confided to me the trust which I was called upon to execute. In my own deliberate judgment, that resolu- tion was an open, palpable violation of the Constitution which Ihad sworn to support. I placed my vote on the ground of fealty to that sacred charter, and I said to the American Senate, " On such a question, the duties and responsibilities of each individual must give the rule of his conduct. It is to be found in communion with God and his own con- science." I abandoned the question of expediency to those who felt themselves at liberty to discuss it. I did not consider that this was my privUege. I said, "It is not expedient for me to do what, in my judg- ment, the Constitution forbids." I referred to the expression, at a pre- ceding session, of my views in relation to the expediency of this measure; but I added that I would cheerfully yield them to the wishes of my con- stituents, which I would have taken care to ascertain if the resolution on which we were acting had ^een compatible with the Constitution. And I added, " Greorgia, sir, is my home, as it was that of him from whom I derived my being, — as it is, and will be, the home of my children. Humanly speaking, it is the boundary of my hopes and of my wishes ; and, whether for weal or for woe, I am content to share the lot of her people. As a Senator of the State of Georgia, therefore, on a question of expediency, the wishes of her people are my wishes j when made known to me they are the rule of my conduct." Here is the pubHshed declaration of my views and opinions, — -the recorded evidence of my conduct on this momentous and agitating ques- tion. I know that they met the approbation of my political associates at home from the many and cheering evidences of approval which were transmitted to me; while even among my opponents there were those who looked with dismay on the inroad which had thus been made on the Constitution of the Union. Whence, then, this denunciation, which an act of treason to the Con- stitution could aione have averted ? Let me tell you, gentlemen, it is not the condemnation of the past, but the apprehension of the future, which prompts it. Honest men, though they may be political opponents, would not require from me the commission of peijurv, even for the acquisition of Texas. That act is not, therefore, the motive to this denunciation : it was the fear of the future which prompted it. The consummation of the union of Texas with this Confederate Republic remains with the American Congress ; and the apprehension is that fliis consummation may be resisted 74 BENCH AND BAK OF GEORGIA. under a continued sense of constitutional obligation. On this point, so far as I am concerned, our opponents may dismiss their fears. Theyhave a security which, under a change of circumstances, they could not give to us, alike resulting from my sense of the constitutional power and duty of an American Senator. The opinion which I am now about to state hag been heretofore expressed on the floor of the Senate on another occasion in combating the doctrine then advanced by a member of that body. It is still my opinion, and must therefore guide my conduct if called to act upon this question. In all open questions, where no previous legislation embarrasses his action, a member of Congress is not only permitted, but bound, to decide for himself how far the proposed measure conforms to or violates the Constitution of the United States. When, however, an act has received the concurring sanction of both branches of the National Legislature, and has been approved by the President, it acquires the authority of law, and it depends upon another department of the Government to decide the question of its constitutionality. So long as it remains on the statute- book, sustained by those sanctions and not annulled by such decision, it is obligatory upon legislators as well as citizens. I will exemplify this opinion. If I believed, as some of our opponents, that Congress had no constitutional power to establish a bank, and, acting on this belief, had voted against its charter, I should not consider myself authorized to refuse by a subsequent act of legislation to provide for the punishment of oflfences against the corporation on the ground that its charter was, in my individual judgment, unconstitutional. I presume that this must have been Mr. Jef- ferson's view when he approved an act establishing a branch of that cor- poration the constitutional validity of whose charter he had denied. In the consummation of their wishes for the annexation of Texas, I have said that its advocates have a security which, under a change of cir« cumstances, they could not give us. With them the maxim is that each public agent is to obey the Constitution as he understands it, — a maxim signally illustrated in the House of Kepresentatives of the United States, when, in defiance of the act for the apportionment of Representatives, they admitted to seats on that floor persons who had been elected in utter disregard of its provisions. I admit the truth of the aphorism that it is lawful to be taught by an enemy ; but that lesson I am not willing to learn. On the question of expediency, my opinion stated in the Senate remains unchanged. I did not doubt that some of our people, abandoning the worn-out fields of Georgia, might derive an immediate profit from the cultivation of the rich and virgin soil of Texas. But I love Georgia better than Texas, and I felt that I was bound to consult the welfare of her col- lective people rather than that of those who, influenced by the thirst of gain, would abandon their native land and the homes of their fathers, leaving it in comparative desolation with the resources which it had given them to build up and enrich another State. I did not realize the truth of the proposition that the annexation of Texas was necessary to the con- servation of our peculiar domestic institutions. My personal observation had assured me that the danger with which these were said to be me- naced had been magnified by demagogues ; and my own view was, and is unchangeably, whenever that danger shall really exist, that the safer as well as loftier course for Southern men to pursue, is to cut at once the cord which binds us to fanatics, and to meet as open enemies rather than JOHN MACPHERSON BERRIEN. 75 as confederate States those who would seek thus insolently to interfere with a subject which belonged to us, and to us alone, exclusively to regulate. I could not doubt — since a portion of Texas, from its soil and climate, was adapted to slave-labor — that the South by its admission would ac- quire an accession of strength in the councils of the Union ; but, when I looked throughout the Confederacy, and saw how many of our eon- federates were in the process of change from the condition of slave to free States, and the utter impossibility that a converse change would occur in any single solitary instance, I felt that this struggle for Southern preponderance in those councils by superiority of numbers was vain and idle, — a war against the fate to which our union with the other States of the Confederacy had destined us, only to be compensated by the essential advantages which that union secured to us ; that it might tem- porarily subserve the views of those whose lives had been spent in one long dream of elevation to the Presidency of these States, but that it could not permanently promote the interests of the South. I feared, too, the influence of this precedent and the overwhelming retribution which might be brought upon us when circumstances should permit and a ma- jority of Congress should resolve upon the annexation of States resting on another border of our Confederacy. The address from which, the above extract relative to Texas is taken was published on a request which was made known to Mr. Berrien by a committee, to whom he replied as follows : — Savassah, November 22, 1845. Gentlemen : — T have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 14th inst., transmitting to me a copy of certain resolutions adopted by the Whig members of the Legislature on the 13th inst., and asking from me for publication a copy of the address delivered by me at that meeting. Availing myself of the earliest moment which, among many and press- ing engagements, I have been able to command, I have hastily committed to paper, and now forward you, the substance of that address. I avail myself of the occasion, through you, to oflfer to the Whig mem- bers of the Legislature of Georgia my respectful acknowledgments for this renewed expression of their confidence, and to you, gentlemen, the assurance of respect and esteem with which I am, faithfully, yours, John Macphekson Berrien. To the Hon. A. J. Miller, C. H. Shocklet, and A. F. Owen. At the same session of the Legislature (1845) the act was passed organizing the Supreme Court of Georgia; and it was the general desire and expectation of the public, without regard to party lines, that Mr. Berrien should be elected one of the judges. At the re- quest of the author, an original letter has been placed in his hands by the gentleman* to whom it was addressed, with permission to use it * Hon. Allen F. Owen. 76 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. in this memoir. It shows the caution of a great mind in adminis- tering law, which ought to rehuke that haste, not to say rashness, with which some judges decide questions of intrinsic difiBculty. Still, it is not pretended to assert that error is the common result of the instantaneous action of our courts. Some are better pre- pared by sudden illumination than they would be by prosy argu- ments, long continued, even to the exhaustion of mind and body. The happy medium has not yet been established, nor can it be until the faculties and tastes of men conform to a standard, — of which there is not the remotest possibility. In the case of Mr. Berrien, his modesty will, no doubt, surprise some who have never been recognised by the public as jurists, but who would, never- theless, consider it a very great omission of duty on their part to decline an office equal in dignity to that of Chief-Magistrate. Washington, January 26, 1846. My dear Sir: — I was gratified by the receipt of your letter, and would gladly have availed myself of an earlier opportunity to say so; but, in doing so now, I beg to add that I shall always be glad to hear from you. I would willingly have contributed my mite to the successful introduc- tion to the people of our Court for the Correction of Errors, if its or- ganization had been such as to have given me hope that I could do so. That I thought impossible. Independently of the sacrifice of individual comfort in attendance upon an itinerant court for eleven months in the year, the fact that it was required, in many instances, to be held in re- mote places, where the judges could not have access to a tolerable law- library and would probably be aided only by the local bar, was decisive against my acceptance of the office. I pretend not to say what others can do. I am quite satisfied that I could not have discharged its duties to my own satisfaction. A life spent in the study of my profession — which I have pursued with some degree of ardor, though, perhaps, not always with sufficient industry — has not qualified me to decide important legal questions without resort to books and time to weigh their maxims ; and I was not willing, for the temptations which this office afforded, to sacrifice what little of legal reputation I may have among my country- men. I was anxious to convince our friends of my desire to meet their wishes if the office could be placed on such a footing as would justify my acceptance of it, and therefore suggested some alterations to be efiiected by a supplemental bill ; but I was not anxious, so far as I was personally concerned, that these should be adopted. ******** There is no occasion for war with England. I am satisfied the Execu- tive does not expect it ; but there are some in Congress and the country who wish it, and more who hope to make political capital by professions of their patriotism and blustering denunciations of England, which may lead to it. Withal, I fear that a propensity for President-making in the Whig ranks may diminish our capacity to resist the effijrts of dema- gogues. JOHN MACPHERSON BERRIEN. 77 I was sorry you had not more time to give us in Savannah, and would have been glad to see you before your departure, as I will be whenever you visit us again. Meantime, I will be gratified to hear from you, and will in reply advise you of the state of things here. I am, dear sir, Respectfully and truly, yours, Jno. Macpherson Berrien. Another letter from Mr. Berrien to the same friend* is here submitted, showing the relative strength of Mr. Clay and Gen. Taylor with the Whig party for a nomination for the Presidency in 1848. It will be seen by the closing paragraph that the letter was not intended for publication; but as the motive of privacy, then proper enough, can no longer apply to aspirants of the same party, and as the silence of the tomb now mantles all that is mortal of the distinguished Taylor, Clay, and Berrien, there can be no impropriety in giving that letter to public inspection, as a record of the calculations which decide great political movements. Besides, it may be truly claimed for Mr. Berrien that it was not his character to write any thing which he would be ashamed to see in print, if all the circumstances were known to the public. Washikgton, March 28, 1848. My dear Sir : — I duly received your very kind and welcome lettei", and have desired to reply to it ; but a constant pressure of engagements such as, for a shorter term, you have experienced at Milledgeville, has prevented me from doing it sooner. I have been compelled to tax my eyes, too, somewhat beyond their capacity, and they have been a little rebellious. I hope this delay will not induce you to abstain from writing. Volumes of correspondence reach me from other States; but the only really welcome letters, speaking generally, are those which come from my own. I read with great pleasure-the account which you give me of B 's success, as satisfactorily confirming the representations which had reached me from others. He has fine talents and a popular eloquence, happily combined with stern integrity, warm affections, and a manly independence of character. If his life is spared, I shall expect to see him prominent in the councils of the nation. The division of opinion among Whigs in relation to Mr. Clay and Gen. Taylor, of which you speak, certainly exists to an unfortunate extent, — not as to the comparative qualifications of the two gentlemen, nor yet as to the individual whom the disputants would prefer to see elected, but as to (what they have coined a new word to designate) their availed biliti/. All admit Mr. Clay's superior qualifications. Nine-tenths of the party would prefer to see him elected if they could believe it practicable ; but he is a defeated candidate. Public and private considerations require that the party should be successful in the approaching contest ; and, while these apprehensions are oppressing us, the name of a Whig general, rendered illustrious by his triumphs, is proclaimed by acclamation, and, aj^arenUy, by all parties. The result was natural. Many leading * Col. Owen. 78 BENCH AND BAK OF GEORGIA. Whigs, sincere friends of Mr. Clay, adopted Gen. Taylor as their can- didate, and justified their abandonment of the former by declaring their belief that he could not under any circumstances be elected. It has been thus with us in Georgia, with a superadded motive, spring- ing from the belief that Gen. Taylor's nomination would have aided us in the late election for Governor, — in which we were sadly mistaken. My firm belief is, and was, that if we had relied less on the military prestigi', of our candidate and the effect of the nomination of Gen. Taylor, and hail conducted that canvass zealously on the ordinary issues, with the super- added one of the Mexican War, we would have succeeded. But I am omitting to answer your inquiry, whether Mr. Clay or Gen. Taylor will be the Whig candidate ; and, in truth, it is difficult to do so. I can only state facts and opinions as they appear to me here. Mr. Clay's name is not yet at the disposal of the party. He came here with a determination to forbid its use, but was prevailed upon to postpone the announcement of it until after the Connecticut elections, concerning the result of which there are fears. This was at the instance of Eastern gentlemen. It is now understood that when at home, whither he has gone, he will survey the whole ground and make and publish his final determination. The truth I believe to be, that, naturally desirous as he is to attain a prize for which he has been so long striving, he is yet extremely reluctant to hazard defeat, and will endeavor to ascertain the probable result before his determination is announced. Yet I presume his name will be before the Convention, because I think the recent mani- festations of public feeling are calculated to bias the judgment of a man of far less sanguine temperament than Mr. Clay. Before the Convention Mr. Clay will not, as compared with Gen. Taylor, be as strong as he would be before the people. Gen. T. will get in Convention the votes of dele- gates from Democratic States, from which he will get no support at the polls. The nomination is, therefore, I think, somewhat uncertain, though the friends of each party claim it as undoubted. My fear has been that we could not elect any Whig. My belief is that Mr. Clay stands a better chance, if nominated, than any other. My reasons are, that he would get every State he got before, except perhaps Tennessee, in lieu of which he would, it seems to be conceded, get New York. Indiana, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Georgia would be to be contended for. If we had not unfortunately committed ourselves, I would not fear a contest in Georgia. I could name a dozen men whose cordial co- operation, if they were unembarrassed by previously-expressed opinions, would insure it. So much for Mr. Clay. Now, as to Gen. Taylor, I think he will lose more Whig than he will gain Democratic votes. I have no idea that he can get any Democratic State but Mississippi. While in his present position, which he declares to be immutable, gentlemen from the Northem and Eastern States say they will not vote for him. They require a man who will avow himself their candidate and the exponent of their principles. I do not hesitate to avow my preference for Mr. Clay, and my readiness to support Gen. Taylor if he is nominated. I have answered your inquiries frankly ; but I do not write for the public. You are entitled to such information as I can give, and you have it. Let me hear from you, and believe me, always, Very truly, yours, Jno. Macpherson Berkien. JOHN MAOPHERSON BERRIEN. 79 In 1847, Mr. Berrien had been re-elected by the Legislature of Georgia for a new term in the Senate, to expire March 4, 1853. During this service the Compromise measures were discussed and adopted by Congress. It will not be necessary to follow the learned Senator through the debates on the Oregon question, Wilmot Proviso, Mexican War, Clayton Amendment, Slave Rescue in Boston, support of President Fillmore in executing the Fugitive Slave Law, and other agitating questions, in which he bore a con- spicuous part, always to the instruction of the Senate, and to the delight of the crowded gallery of spectators when it was known that he would occupy the floor. Much space has already been devoted to extracts from his speeches which appeared necessai-y to his vindication ; for it was his fortune, good or bad, to be ever severely scrutinized, and to have less than justice meted to him by his political opponents, as a general thing. It is no discredit to them that his eminent abilities, commanding reputation, the splendor of his eloquence in debate, the graces of his pen, and the influence of his unsullied name, constituted him an adversary whom they might well dread. But why he was traduced in so persevering a manner by a portion of the press and certain party leaders in Georgia can be explained only by the plea of human infirmity when interest and justice are in opposite scales. Much has been said of late of the petition signed by three thou- sand clergymen of New England, praying the repeal of the Fugitive Slave Law. On the 17th of February, 1851, Mr. Hamlin, of Maine, presented to the Senate a petition for this object, which is believed to be the same in substance, if not in the precise form, of that signed by the clergy, as follows : — To the Senate and Souse of Representatives of the United States. Whereas, CoDgress, at its late session, did pass a bill entitled An act to amend and supplementary to an act entitled An act respecting fugitives from justice and persons escaping from the service of their masters, approved February 12, 1793, which said enactment was approved by the President, September 18, 1850; We, the undersigned, residents of the town of Burnham, in the county of Waldo and State of Maine, regarding that said act is in conflict with the Constitution of the United States, and also as infringing upon the duties which we owe to benevolence, to humanity, and to God, and being unwilling to comply with its requisitions or submit to its penalties, earnestly ask its speedy repeal or modification. On the motion of Mr. Hamlin, the petition was referred to the Judiciary Committee, which fact coming to the knowledge of Mr, 80 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. Berrien, he on the same day urged his objections, which may be seen in the official reports* of the Senate, thus : — When the Senator from New Hampshire advises his coadjutors to transfer these speeches — calculated, if not intended, to produce excitement among the people of this Union — from the Senate-Chamber to the stump, it would have been gratifying if he had enforced his precept by his example. But I rise for the pui-pose of calling the attention of the Senate to the nature of the memorial which has produced this discussion. Unquestionably it was by an oversight that the vote of the Senate to refer it to the Judiciary Committee was talcen. Sir, what is it ? We are told that the signers of the paper are respectable persons. What evidence is there in the paper presented to the Senate that this memorial was ever signed by those individuals ? Here are several sheets of paper on which names are inscribed, and on the top of these papers is pasted a memorial. There is not the slightest evidence upon the face of the paper that the memorial was ever subscribed by the individuals whose names are attached to it. And, sir, if they are of the respectable character which is given to them by the Senator from Maine, of which I will not permit myself to express, because I do not entertain, a moment's doubt, the inference is a plain one that such men of respectable character have never signed such a petition. What is it ? It states that you passed a law at the last session of Congress which violates the Constitution of the country, which is in conflict with the duties which we owe to benevolence, to humanity, and to God, — a law with the requisitions of which they are not willing to comply, and to the penalties of which they are not disposed to submit. It is this memorial, calling for a modification or repeal of the Fugitive Slave Law, which, by a vote of the Senate, is to be referred to the Judiciary Committee. And now, I pray you, what is the inquiry, or what are the inquiries, which that Committee is to make ? We are to inquire if the Congress of the United States at the last session have passed a law in violation of the Constitution, — have passed a law violating the duties of benevolence and humanity, and the duty which we owe to God. We are to inquire whether these memorialists are bound by the requi- .D BAB OF GEORGIA. herein erred. Well, sir, the priaciples then contended for by those two great men have been recognised as the principles of the Kepublican party of these United States, and it will- be seen that the substitute is not only in strict accordance with the spirit of the Virginia and Kentucky Kesola- tions, but the first five of them are almost exact transcripts. Is there an honorable Senator of this House who will attempt to controvert these celebrated resolutions ? None would be so hardy. Well, then, whence can arise the opposition to the substitute offered b^ the minority of the committee, agreeing as it does, both in spirit and in language, with these resolutions ? K those who have avowed themselves advocates of the Jeffersonian doctrines are consistent, then do I look for their support of the resolutions proposed by myself. Then, sir, what is the sum and substance of these resolutions? It is that this General Government is a government of delegated powers, and entitled to no other powers than those delegated to it, and that the States have certain rights. Here arises the grand question at issue : — What are those rights, and how are they to be exercised? These resolutions declare their right to interpose and protect the people from the encroach- ment of any undelegated power and to pronounce any such attempts unconstitutional, null, and void ; that the people of a State, or, in other words, the State herself, shall be the judge of the constitutionality of a law and whether it be usurpation or not; and that the States have the right to judge of the mode and the measure of redress. I call upon gen- tlemen who differ from me — and dare them to the investigation of the resolutions of 1798 and 1799 — to say whether these sentiments are not in strict accordance with those of Jefferson and Madison, and whether they do not embody the Kepublican doctrines of 1801. Are they not those upon which the two great parties of Federal and State-Rights con- tend that they are still divided? If I am incorrect in what I have stated, there is ample testimony at hand to detect my errors- but, sir, however feeble I may be as an advocate, I claim the merit at least of keeping within the bounds of historical truth. The issue is now as it was then; and, though shades of verbal difference may seem to exist, it is a war between the same contending principles. When the Virginia and Kentucky Eesolutions were sent to the various State Legislatures, all those north of a certain line declared them to be dangerous to the Government of the United States, subversive of the prin- ciples on which it was based, and that the Federal Constitution admitted of no such construction. Then the issue between the Federalists or friends of an inferential construction of the compact, and the Repub- licans, or friends of a strict construction, was fairly brought before the American people. The people, sir, when not led away by interested demagogues, but suffered to reflect, will always be right. They were so then, and the result was the election of Mr. Jefferson to the Presidency. Then was the triumph of the Republican doctrines accomplished; and from that day to the present the same parties have continued in conflict under some form or other, the chief variations being only in names with very few material shades of difference. Am I incorrect, sir? 1 hold in my hand the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 from which the first four in the substitute of the minority of the com- mittee are taken, and I call upon those gentlemen who profess themselves to belong to the Republican party to say whether they will now abandon the principles contained in them,— the principles of those great champions WILLIAM C. DAWSON. 265 of liberty, Madison and Jefferson, and the principles -which, we have been taught, were those alone which could secure the stability of our Union and the perpetuity of our great Confederacy. [Here Mr. Dawson read the Virginia and Kentucky R;esolutions whicli appeared in the report of his speech.] Well, then, sir, we have seen that Virginia advocated those doctrines ; and we shall see that the State of Georgia, with some few alterations, fol- lowed in the wake. In 1802 occurred the well-known case of Chisholm, when the State of Georgia was cited before the Supreme Court, and all the judges, with the exception of Judge Iredell, declared the Supreme Court had jurisdiction. A brief history of that case is this : — In the year 1792 the United States Marshal served copies of a process from the Supreme Court on the then Governor of the State of Georgia and the Attorney-General of the State, at the instance of one Chisholm. After the meeting of the Supreme Court, the then Attorney- General of the United States moved, " That, unless the State of Georgia shall, after reasonable notice of tMs motion, cause an appearance to be entered in behalf of said State on the fourth day of the next term, or shall then show cause to the contrary, judgment shall be entered against the said State, and a writ of inquiry of damages awarded." At the February term, 1793, the case was called up, and a protest of the State of Georgia (sent by the authorities of the State) was presented, denying aU jurisdiction by the United States courts, and absolutely refusing to enter into any argument or to answer in any other way. The case was then argued ex parte, and the court did decide against the State of Georgia in favor of the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. On the question of jurisdiction all the judges agreed except one, (Judge Iredell,) who maintained — and independently — the States to be creators and superiors of the General Government, and happily elucidated the distinction between a sowerei'^ra Slate andamere corporation. Judgment was then taken by default against Georgia, and additional notices of the proceedings of the court served. To none of these proceedings did the sovereign State of Georgia yield. She disobeyed and disregarded; she interposed her sovereignty; or, if gentlemen prefer or will not be frightened, I will say Georgia nullified. At February Term, 1794, of the Supreme Court, judgmevf was rendered against her by default, and a writ of inquiry ordered. Was this writ ever executed ? No, sir. See 2 Dallas's Re- ports, 419, where this case is reported. Thus Georgia set this decision at naught; she defeated it; and therein, by an act of nullification, avow- ing her determination to resist the mandate, she did not appear. What, sir, was the consequence ? Was there any disturbance ? Was there any convulsion ? Was there any bloodshed, any war, any pestilence ? No, sir. In spite of the position assumed by the Supreme Court, — which took an ex parte proceeding, and had judgment entered against the State, — what did Georgia do? She declared the jurisdiction null and void and refused obedience. What, then, sir, was the consequence of all this ? No war, sir, no bloodshed, no convulsion. No, sir. The people of the United States met and amended the Constitution, limited the powers of the Supreme Court, and declared that the Constitution could not be so construed as to give to that court the power claimed. The foregoing is not the whole of the speech delivered by Mr. 266 BENCH AND BAB OF GEORGIA. Dawson, a portion of it being reserved for another paper. The following editorial paragraph appeared in connection with the speech, and is here inserted to throw light on the issues of that day:— In the recent debate in the Senate, we were rauch struck with the vast apparent difference between the orators on both sides. The gentlemen of the State-Eights party who spoke in favor of the substitute offered by the minority presented the doctrines of the party with so much eloquence, that we were not surprised at the apparent reluctance with which our opponents came forward to vindicate themselves from the inconsistencies charged upon them and proved so conclusively. The President of the Senate vacated his chair to reply to Mr. Dawson. Standing so high in the confidence of our adversaries, and holding his office by their suffrages, we must believe the positions he advanced to be the tenets of the party to which he belongs. We listened with much attention to his speech, and for the life of us we could not distinctly perceive the honorable Senator's meaning, — doubtless owing rather to our limited capacity than the orator's perspicuity. We understood him to say " that the people were the source of power," and from this axiom he deduced the conclusion, that, as the agents of the people exercised the attributes of sovereignty, the sovereignty resided with them ; or, in his own words, " the Grovern- ments created by them were sovereign." He afterward asserted that " the people could create any amount of sovereignty they pleased !" — a task that, with all their admitted omnipotence, they would find it rather difficult to accomplish. The occurrences of the last few days have now clearly developed the creed which our adversaries profess. The positions maintained by their orators in the Senate are perfectly in accordance with the Federal doctrines so signally defeated in 1801. We feel ourselves forced to the conclusion that they are Federalists in theory and practice when the people can be deluded, but, when cases occur where the deceptive system cannot be further practised upon, they abandon all they labor so hard to prove, and furtively attempt to appropriate to themselves the practice of the State-Rights party, at the same time loudly condemning their principles. This delusion cannot be longer supported by those whose interest it is to deceive the people. Georgia, on the question which has called forth legislative interposition, is awake; the mask will be plucked from the features of Federalism, which it now conceals, and the independent freemen of this State will turn from their confidence those by"whom they have been duped. The reaction is commencing even now :' the brazen idol totters on its clay foundation, and a short year will see it shattered to fragments in its fall. In the next- Legislature the State- Rights party will preponderate ; and if in the case of State interposition, where Georgia now stands ready to put forth her arm in defence of her rights, the doctrines of the Federalists shall weigh it to the earth, she will be nobly redeemed when the principles of the State-Rights party become (as they must eventually become) the principles of the State. In 1835, Mr. Dawson was re-elected to the State Senate. On the breaking out of hostilities in the Creek nation, in the spring of 1836, he raised a volunteer company, marched at their head, and received from General Scott a separate command for special WILLIAM C. DAWSON. 267 ser'V'ice, the duties of which he performed to the satisfaction of that gallant soldier.* In the same year he was nominated for Congress, on general ticket, and was elected a member of the House of Re- presentatives to commence 4th March, 1837. A vacancy occur- ring by the death of General John Coffee, Mr. Dawson was elected to fill the unexpired term, and took his seat in Congress on the first Monday in December, 1836. He at once became a prominent, working, influential member, and was re-elected in 1838 and in 1840. Such was his popularity — supposed to exceed that of any man in Georgia — ^tbat his political friends, after mature consultation in the usual mode, nominated him for the Executive in 1841, in oppo- sition to Gov. McDonald. But he was defeated by a majority of about four thousand votes, owing, unquestionably, to the perse- cution waged against him in the canvass on account of a vote he gave in Congress including tea and coffee in the tariff for revenue. For convenient reference, the author has collected the official votes cast by the people at each election for Governor : — 1825. G. M. Troup, 20,545 J. Clark, 19,862 -683 1827. J. Forsyth, 22,220 Scattering, 9,072 40,407 1829. G. R. Gihner, 24,204 J. Crawford, 10,718 81,292 1831. W. Lumpkin, 27,305 G. R. Gilmer, 25,853 -12,158 34,922 1833. W. Lumpkin, 30,861 J. Crawford, 28,585 -13,486 59,446 1837. G. R. Gihner, 34,178 W. Schley, 33,417 -2,276' 53,158 1835. W. Schley, 31,177 C. Dougherty, 28,606 -1,452 59,783 -2,571 67,595 -761 1839. C. J. McDonald, 34,634 C. Dougherty, 32,807 67,441 -1,827 * See White's Historical Collections of Georgia, p. 482. 268 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. 1841. C. J. McDonald, 37,847 W. C. Dawson, 33,703 71,550 1845. G. W. Crawford, 41,514 M. H. McAllister, 39,763 -4,144 1843. G. W. Crawford, 38,713 M. A. Cooper, 35,325 3,388 74,038 1847. G. W. Towns, 43,220 D. L, Clinch, 41,931 81,277 184i >. G.W. Towns, 46,514 E. Y. mi, 43,322 g 89,836 1853. H.V. Johnson, 47,708 C.J. Jenkins, 47,168 1,751 85,151 -1,289 1851. H. Cobb, 57,397 C. J. McDonald, 38,824 3,192 96,221 -18,573 540 94,876 1855. H.V.Johnson, 54,461 G. Andrews, 43,721 10,740 R. H. Overby, 6,261 6,261 4,479 104,443 Pending the election for Governor, Mr. Dawson did not resign his seat in Congress, as it is quite common among politicians to hold on to what they have until the better office is secured. But after the refusal of his fellow-citizena to accept his tender of service as Chief-Magistrate, he resigned, from a proper feeling of delicacy and self-respect, construing the vote against him as a disapproval of his course in Congress. After his withdrawal from public life, Mr. Dawson gave himself up to his profession, and was employed in the chief causes of his circuit. He was a very effective advocate, and, where important interests had to be litigated, he was generally selected as leading counsel. On the 1st of February, 1845, Gov. Crawford tendered him the appointment of Judge of the Ockmulgee Circuit, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of the Hon. Francis S. Cone. He accepted the office until an election could be had by the Legis- lature, positively declining to be a candidate. A new scene is now to open to Judge Dawson, — one which is to crown his eminently useful and agreeable life. At the session of WILLIAM C. DAWSON. 269 the Legislature in November, 1847, he was elected* a Senator in Congress for a term of six years, commencing on the 4th of March, 1849. This is justly regarded as one of the most honorable positions in the Government. It was a tribute worthily bestowed. Of the part acted by Judge Dawson in the Senate of the United States, it is the purpose of the author to give an outhne, by refer- ence to public documents and other reliable sources of information. . Merely to show the form, the author gives the copy of a very proper credential : — State of Georgia. — By his Excellency GtEORGE W. Towns, Governor of said State. To the Honorable William C. Dawson, greeting : Whereas, by the third section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States of America, it is ordained and established that the Senate of the United States should be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof for the term of sis years ; and whereas, the General Assembly did,, by joint-ballot of both branches thereof, on the thirteenth day of November instant, elect you, the said William C. Dawson, to be one of the Senators from this State in the Con- gress of the United States, to serve six years from and after the fourth day of March, eighteen hundred and forty-nine : These are therefore to commission and authorize you, the said William C. Dawson, to take session in the Senate of the United States from and after the fourth day of March, 1849, to use and exercise all and every the privileges and powers which you may or can do in and by virtue of the said Constitution, in behalf of this State. Given under my hand and the great seal of the State, at the y<;=^=^ Capitol in Milledgeville, this nineteenth day of November, in the ( 5^5^J year of our Lord eighteen hundred and forty-seven, and of the " Independence of the United States of America the seventy- second. By the Governor : ^^°^«^ ^- T°^^'^- N. C. Baenett, Secretary of State. All who were weU acquainted with Judge Dawson know his industrious habits. The record, therefore, affords only what might be expected in this regard. The author has before him the Con- gressional Globe for certain sessions of Congress, and a summary is here given of the debates in which Judge Dawson participated in the Senate. At the session of 1850-51 he addressed the Senate on the following subjects : — 1. On the bill for the relief of Irad Day. 2. On the bill authorizing the State of Wisconsin to select the residue of a certain grant of land. * The baUot stood,— W. C. Dawson, 91 ; W. T. Colquitt, 85. 270 BENCH AND BAK OF GEORGIA. 3. On the bill granting lands to Louisiana and Mississippi for the construction of a railroad. 4. On the bill for the settlement of private land-claims in California. 5. On the Deficiency Bill. 6. On the bill granting land for the benefit of the indigent insane. 7. On the bill to remit duty on certain railroad-iron. 8. On the bill explanatory of the bounty-land law. 9. On the appropriation to pay the amount of a judgment to Manuel Harmony. 10. On the proposed dry-dock in California. 11. On the bill to assist the State of Louisiana to reclaim the swamp-lands within her borders. While the joint resolution from the House of Representatives was before the ' Senate makiog land-warrants assignable, Judge Dawson offered the following amendment : — And he it farther Remlved, That nothing in the first section of the act of 28th September, 1850, grantiog bounty-lands to certain officers and soldiers who have been engaged in the military service of the United States, shall be so construed as to exclude any commissioned or non-com- missioned officer, musician, or private, whether of regulars, volunteers, rangers, or militia, who was mustered into the service of the United States for the suppression or prevention of Indian hostUities and served the length of time required by said act. At the session for 1851—52, Judge Dawson submitted remarks to the Senate : — 1. On the resolution relative to the reception and entertainment of Kossuth. 2. In regard to intercourse with France. 3. On the bill for the relief of Margaret Hetzel.' 4. On the bill providing for the assignability of land-warrants. 5. On the bill for the relief of Erastus A. Capron. 6. On the bill for the relief of Thomas H. Leggett. 7. On the bill for the benefit of Carmelite nunnery. 8. On the joint resolution for the continuance of the work on the Capitol. 9. On the public expenditures. 10. On the bill granting to Ohio the unsold lands in that State. 11. In relation to the proceedings of the Whig Congressional Caucus. 12. On the bill authorizing a survey for a basin for the Chesa- peake and Ohio Canal. WILLIAM C. DAWSOS. 271 13. On the bill granting land to Wisconsin for a railroad. 14. On the memorial of the Society of Friends in relation to the Fugitive Slave Law. 15. On the bill granting land to Michigan for a railroad. 16. On the bill emendatory of the patent-laws. 17. On the bill for the relief of Elizabeth B. Lomax. 18. On the bill providing for an exchange of school-lands. 19. On the bill for the relief of the legal representatives of James C. Watson. 20. In relation to the North American fisheries. 21. In relation to the Census Board. 22. On the bill providing for the election of a public printer. 23. On the Apportionment Bill. 24. In relation to printing the Census returns. 25. In relation to the construction of a ship-canal around the Falls of St. Mary. 26. On the Iowa Land Bill. 27. Concerning the Expedition to Japan. 28. On the bill providing payment for the surveys of claims in California. 29. Concerning the establishment of a telegraph and mail- line to California. 30. For the relief of the West Feliciana Railroad Company. 31. On the Army Appropriation Bill. 32. On the appropriation for the Collins line of steamers. 33. On the appropriation to pay balances due the Creek In- dians. 34. On the appropriation to indemnify the people of Georgia, Alabama, and Florida for depredations committed by the Creek Indians. 35. On the Naval Appropriation Bill. 36. On the proposition to regulate the appointment of mid- shipmen. 37. On the appropriation for the Seneca Indians of New York. 38. On the bill to increase the salary of the District Judge of New Hampshire. 39. On the appropriation! for the floating dry-dock at San Francisco, California. 40. On the appropriation for the Indians in California. 41. On the Civil and Diplomatic Bill. As Judge Dawson had the sagacity and boldness to differ from 272 BENCH AXD BAR OF GEORGIA. a majority of the Senate in relation to Kossuth, the subject will be more particularly noticed. On the 3d day of December, 1851, the following joint resolution was taken up in its order : — Joint resolution in relation to the reception and entertainment of Louis Kossuth, Governor of Hungary, in the United States. Be it Resolved, &e. That a joint committee of the two Houses of Con- gress, to consist of — members of the Senate and — members of the House of Eepresentatives, be appointed by the presiding officers of the respective Houses, to make suitable arrangements for the reception of Louis Kossuth, Governor of Hungary, on his arrival in the United States, and to communicate to him assurances of the profound respect entertained for him by the people of the United States, and to tender to him, on the part of Congress, and in the name of the people of the United States, the hospitalities of the metropolis of the Union. Judge Dawson addressed the Senate as follows :* — Mr. President : — Perhaps it would be as well to meet the question at once upon the proposition to fill these blanks. I am not prepared myself, as a representative of one of the States of this Union, to adopt this" reso- lution. As an individual, as a citizen of the United States, I am willing to show to Kossuth that respect which my judgment and my feelings may dictate; but in my capacity as a Senator I cannot consent to what is here proposed. I know of no precedent in the history of our Legislature which would justify the adoption of this resolution. I have never known such marked distinction shown to any distinguished citizen of our own country, whether a military man or a civilian. I see nothing in the character of this distinguished individual which should make the Government of the United States get up a great pageant on his account and distinguish him from all other men who have ever lived. Has he ever been connected with our institutions ? Has he ever rendered any particular service to this country to entitle him to this mark of distinction ? Not at all. It is true he is a great man, but he is not greater than many men who now live and have lived. His position is such as to call into exercise our sympathies for him and his associates as men. That sympathy this Government has already shown to an extent almost unparalleled, by send- ing one of the national vessels to receive him and his associates, if they were willing to come to this country. Have we not done enough to show our sympathies and our good feelings ? I think we have. Against the man's character and cause I utter not a word. The American heart is open for his reception. It is the people who will receive him. La- fayette, when he came to this country, was received in a manner which was justifiable on the part of the Government of that day, because he was connected with the Revolution which gave us the liberties which we enjoy. Several days afterward, when the resolution was again under consideration, Mr. Dawson remarked if — * See Congresaonal Globe, vol. xxiv. part 1, p. 21. f Ibid, p. 71. ■n-ILLIAM C. DAWSON. 273 Mr. President : — ^Whea the first resolution offered by the Senator from Mississippi (Mr. Foote) was presented, I briefly stated the reasons why I could not vote for that resolution. Since the discussion has commenced, the character of the proposition before the body has most essentially changed. It is due to candor, and to a right understanding of this sub- ject, before the nation and the distinguished individual whom we are dis- posed to honor, that we should understand each other thoroughly, — that we should know what were the expectations created in the mind of Kossuth when he received what is called the invitation to the hospitalities of this country. We have to ask him his impression of that invitation. We should know what expectations were created. We should understand them. We should understand his impressions of the obligations he is laid under. And that candor would compel us to investigate the understand- ing between the host and the guest. We tendered to him a national ves- sel to come to this country and seek an asylum, — or to come and receive hospitality, according to the interpretation of some. We did not intend to interfere with the domestic affairs of Hungary or any other country. We found him an exUe, a voluntary captive, or under the hospitable pro- tection of the Turkish Government. We asked him here. He has come. On his way to receive our hospitality, he announced to the world the character of the invitation. He lets us understand what is his construc- tion of it : that he has come here, not merely for the purpose of receiving our sympathy, but to ask us to interfere between his country and foreign Governments. He asks us to declare that we will interfere, in the event that the struggle should recommence in Hungary against Austria. He tells the world that this is the object of his visit. And when he lands on our shores he tells us that he knew he had our sympathies ; that he and his countrymen had the sympathies of the world ; that it was not from mere sympathy that he crossed the Atlantic Ocean ; that he came here to have something more substantial. He wants to receive the pledge of this Government, that, if the hour of revolution should ever come again in his fatherland, the United States will stand by and see fair play, and that if any other nation on earth interferes, then the United States shall take part in the controversy. That is the character of the position he now occupies. He tells us that he expects the material of aid to protect his country. And what is that ? Men, money, and arms. That is his im- pression. Is it not, then, due to candor — do not honor and magnanimity require us — to announce to Kossuth that this Government has no such design ? Will you suffer .him to come to the seat of Government with such expec- tations ? or will you state to him the character in which you expect to re- ceive him ? My colleague, (Mr. Berrien,) sensible of his position, and of the impression made upon the mind of this distinguished individual by the formal welcome to our shores, has introduced an amendment asking us to announce to him that he is mistaken, — that he is not to come to the seat of Government of this great nation under the expectation that this Go- vernment gives any pledge, or any assurance, that they will sustain him at any time. Why should we not tell him that he must not expect that we shall afford him men and means as a Government ? As an honorable man, connected with another individual, would you suffer that individual to have wrong impressions in relation to the course you intended to pur- sue ? Would you not let him understand precisely what you intended ? Just so with nations. It is due from the Government of the United States Vol. I.— 18 274 BENCH AND BAR OF GEORGIA. to announce to this distinguisbed individual the object they have in view. I submit to honorable Senators whether they intend to justify the expecta- tions which Kossuth has announced he had in coming to this country ? Will they allow the impression to be left on his mind that we are to fur- nish him with any material of war? I think not; although some Senators declare they will not express opinion one way or the other; that " suffi- cient unto the day is the evil thereof;" when the occasion arises they will determine whether or not to interfere. Tliis is the language of the Sena- tor from Illinois, (Mr. Douglas.) This is the language of the Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Cass,) and, indirectly, the language of the Senator from Mississippi, (Mr. Poote.) When the Senator from Mississippi read the speech made by the present distinguished Secretary of State (Mr. Webster) in 1823, it at once drew my attention to the state of this country at the time, and to the principles upon which the Republican party have stood from the days of Washing- ton down to the present hour. Then it was that revolutions were going on in South America ; then it was that our country had to announce to the civilized world the principles upon which we administered this happy government. Then it was, I would remind the Senator, that the distin- guished Mr. Monroe, who concentrated in himself, on account of his purity, both the Republican and Federal parties, announced what were the prin- ciples of this Government, and the principles which had been sustained by Washington, by Adams, by Jefferson, and by Madison. I will show you, by reference to the message of 1824, what were the views of 3Ir. Monroe, and upon precisely such a question as this ; that is, the question of inter- ference with foreign Governments. I beg to read from that message, in order that this may go out with the speech which was read by the Senator from Mississippi. Mr. FooiE, of Mississippi. I wish to ask the gentleman whether we are to understand him as concurring with Mr. Webster or Mr. Monroe. Mr. Dawsgis. K they differ at all, I concur with Mr. Monroe, thougt I do not think there is any difference of opinion. But I would ask the Senator, in return, whether in 1824 he would have concurred with Mr. Webster or Mr. Monroe. Mr. FooTE. If their views were the same, there is no necessity for that. Mr. Dawson. I read from Mr. Monroe's message of 1824 : [Only the closing portion of the extract in Mr. Dawson's speech is here given.] " Separated, as we are, from Europe, by the great Atlantic Ocean, we can have no concern in the wars of the European Governmeats, nor in the causes which produce them. The balance of power between them, into whichever scale it may turn in its various vibrations, cannot affect us. It is the interest of the United States to preserve the most friendly re- lations with every power, and on conditions fair, equaJ, and applicable to all. But in regard to our neighbors [the South American States] our. situation is different. It is impossible tor the European Governments to interfere in their concerns, especially in those alluded to, [casting off the Spanish yoke,] which are vital, without affecting us : indeed, the motive which might induce such interference in the present state of the war between the parties, if a war it may be called, would appear to be equally applicable to us. It is gratifying to know that some of the powers with whom we enjoy a very friendly intercourse, and to whom these views have been communicated, have appeared to acquiesce in them." WILLIAM C. DAWSON. 275 Sir, (continued Mr. Dawson,) the principles here laid down by Mr. Monroe have been laid down from the foundation of this Government : that we should not interfere in the affairs of European nations, that we should take no part in their wars, and that we should suffer no European power to interfere or intermeddle with the relations of this continent. What is sought now to be done ? I know that gentlemen disclaim the idea of interference; that is, they do not intend to intermeddle in any of their strifes. But what is the proposition before us, stripped of the circumstances which surround it? Take away the verbiage and the rhetoric which have been thrown around it, and what does the proposition amount to ? What does Kossuth expect from this country ? What does he believe your invitation is intended to signify ? From whom can you get this information but himself? He tells you, candidly, that he comes not merely for your sympathy, but for your material, — for your pronuncia^ mento or proclamation that, in case Austria and Hungary again engage in bloody strife, you will stand by and see fair play ; and, if any other foreign power interferes, we shall take a hand in it. I defy any Senator to put a different construction upon the language of this distinguished man. Tet in a crisis like this in our own country, at a time just preceding the Pre- sidential election, when the foreign influence is tremendous, we are called upon to do this. I say it is wrong. There is a want of candor and a want of magnanimity in giving him a public reception here, unless we tell him what we really intend to do, and what we intended at the time we invited him, and that when we opened our hearts to receive him it was for the purpose of throwing around him the protection of the Consti- tution and laws of this country. But when he comes here he changes his character to that of an agitator, and proclaims to us. Gentlemen, I will dine with you : but I shall prescribe the character of the dishes which shall be on your table; I shall tell you what I expect when I come to see you, and not have it to your own taste. This question comes home to our candor and magnanimity, not as politicians, but as men and states- men. The consequences growing out of this question will involve not us only, but our reputation as a Senate. Is there a Senator here who would say to Kossuth, "We will give you the material of war at the pro- per time" ? But he says, " I came here under that expectation : I an- nounced that expectation : and still you asked me to come." He will say to you, as he said to the deputation from Philadelphia, that " if he had known, before he came here, that this was the limitation upon the invita- tion, he would have hesitated long before he would have come." Kossuth is acting with candor. He is carrying out that boldness and independence of conduct which has marked his career. Let us follow the same example ; and, when dealing with a man of honor, of chivalry, of in- telligence and statesmanship, let us deal with him in candor, and not allow him to be led astray by our uncertain course. Hence it is that I have taken up my position in opposition to this resolution ; hence I oppose the resolution of the Senator from New York. What is meant by it '( The Senator from Michigan says. We welcome Kossuth as the repre- sentative of a great principle. Of what principle ? Kossuth says it is the right of nations to interfere with foreign nations ; not the principle of non- intervention, but the right to interfere, when two contending powers are engaged in war, to prevent a third power from taking part. That is his principle, and he expects to be sustained. Now, will you receive him, and receive him publicly, without announcing to him what we mean, without 276 BENCH AXD BAR OF GEORGIA. letting him understand, as proposed by my colleague, the principle which we intend to pursue, — a principle coeval with the foundation of our Union ? I ask pardon of the Senate for having trespassed so long upon them. I did not design to speak; but I thought it necessary for me to do so in consequence of the position in which the question had been placed. The reader may see the various resolutions about Kossuth, and the final action of Congress on the subject, by reference to another part* of this work. Following the example of other Senators, who took occasion to notice on the floor of the Senate certain newspaper-allusions to them, Mr. Dawson, on the 15th of April, 1852, asked the indulgence of the Senate for a personal explanation. He had seen in a New York paperf some unfair criticisms relative fro a Whig caucus which he was charged with attending a few nights previously. His name occurred in the following passage : — What are the facts of this Whig caucus ? The North was there in strength. William H. Seward, Thaddeus Stevens, Mr. Wade, of Ohio, and other notorious ringleaders of the Abolitionists, were there, apparently the most efficient members in the practical action of the caucus. Certain spirited and consistent Union Whig members from Kentucky, Tennessee, and North Carolina were there, boldly demanding an understanding with the North, as the first step to united action ; but they were overwhelmed. There was a debate of four hours ; but the question was deferred, and Mr. Mangum intimated that he should at the next meeting mle the motion for an understanding to be out of order. This is bad, and places Mr. Man- gum in a bad position ; and the apparent concurrence with his views by Messrs. Badger, Dawson, Jones, of Tennessee, Stanly, and some other Southern Whigs, places them in the same questionable attitude. In another article the same paper remarks : — Mr. Mangum would undoubtedly, upon a satisfactory platform, be a very popular candidate to run with Gen. Scott. Perhaps his colleagues — Mr. Badger, of the Senate, and Mr. Stanly of the House — entertain the sanie opinion. It may be that Mr. Senator Dawson, of Georgia, has some aspirations for the Vice-Presidency. At all events, the apparent willin