■csl VT3 Hntt (|olUge of Agriculture 3^t (ijatnell ItttnerattH 3ttrara, N. H. Slibtarg r c Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924055506632 ECONOMIC STUDIES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO NUMBER V. No. I. THE SCIENCE OF FINANCE An authorized translation of GusTAV Cohn's Finanzwissen- schaft. By T. B. Veblbn. 800 pp., royal 8vo, cloth, ^3.50 No. II. HISTORY OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY By Henry Kirke White. 132 pp., royal 8vo, cloth, $1.50 No. III. THE INDIAN SILVER CURRENCY By Karl Ellstaetter. Translated from the German by J. Laurence Laughlin. 132 pp., royal 8vo, cloth, IS1.25 No. IV. STATE AID TO RAILWAYS IN MISSOURI By John W. Million, A.M. 264 pp., royal 8vo, cloth, ;?i.75 No. V. A HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION By Henry Parker Willis. 342 pp., royal 8vo, cloth, $i.oa A HISTORY LATIN MONETARY UNION A STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL MONETARY ACTION BY HENRY PARKER WILLIS SOMETIME FELLOW IN POLITICAL ECONOMY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE IN' WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Zbe "DlnlversltB ot Cbfcago ftrese 1901 Copyrighted by THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 1901 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS To WILLIAM LYNE WILSON WITH TRUE REGARD PREFACE. In writing the following pages, I have attempted to do little more than to treat the history of the Latin Union, from its formation in 1865 to the present time. This book, therefore, is not a history of money in France and the allied countries, nor does it pretend to give a full account of the bimetallic controversy during the period in ques- tion. The reasons for this limitation in scope will be sufficiently apparent to require no detailed mention. Unity of purpose, how- ever, has not been sought to the exclusion of matter which, while not directly pertinent to the subject in hand, is yet of importance in com- prehending its historical relations. It has thus been thought helpful to give some attention to the course of monetary events leading up to action on the part of the Latin Union as a whole. Only so much has been said of the "international bimetallic conferences" as was neces- sary to explain the attitude adopted toward them by the union itself. Again, no more attention has been paid to the inconvertible paper of France and Italy than was necessary to explain the influence exerted by this currency upon the metallic money, in altering its distribu- tion and deranging the working of the regulations providing for international circulation. The effort has everywhere been made to rely mainly upon original sources for information. In discussing the action of the Latin Union itself, the material has, of course, been gathered solely from the official reports. Nearly all of the important monetary documents published in France, Belgium, and Italy since 1850, especially those bearing directly upon the bimetallic question, have been examined. In study- ing the course of exchange and kindred matters, reliance has been placed upon the quotations as published in financial journals like the Economiste Fran(ais and London Economist, but, in attempting to explain the condition of the market, inferences have usually been independently drawn. Further, the purpose of furnishing some reason for current events by a reference to pre-existing conditions has been kept in view. The superficial facts in the history of the Latin Union are already familiar to the reading public. What is less well known is its internal historv. Vm PREFACE The object of this study, then, has been (i) to furnish an impartial historical account of the various steps taken by the Latin Union, especially so far as concerns its treatment of the silver question ; and (2) to see how far such an account will furnish support for certain current notions regarding the monetary problem as affected by the action of the Latin Union. The book aims to be nothing more than a historical monograph, and makes no effort to enter into the merits of the monetary question as such. I wish to offer my thanks to Professor J. Laurence Laughlin, of the University of Chicago, for the varied assistance and criticism, without which I should have been unable to complete this study. I desire also to express to M. de Foville, director of the French mint, my appreciation of his courtesy in allowing me the use of the pri- vate library of the mint; and to M. de Maserolles, of the French mint, my obligations for the assistance afforded in consulting books and documents. My thanks are also due to Mr. N. C. Frederiksen for many useful suggestions and much assistance, and to M. Ottomar Haupt, and M. Pierre des Essars, of the Bank of France, for some hints regarding the stocks of the precious metals existing in the coun- tries of the Latin Union, as well as to Dr. Charles L. Crow, who has read the proof-sheets of the book. This book was first prepared for publication in the Economic Studies of the University of Chicago, early in 1897. Owing to an unavoidable delay in continuing the publication of those monographs, its appear- ance has been postponed to the present time. That it is now issued in that series is due to the generosity of the Hon. Isidor Strauss, of New York City, whose efforts in promoting economic study and research are well known. To him the acknowledgments of those interested in the series are due, and are hereby offered. H. Parker Willis. Lexington, Virginia, October 1900. CONTENTS. PAGE Chapter I — Monetary History of France, 1803 to 1858 i Chapter II — Belgian Monetary History, 1832 to 1862 15 Chapter HI — Swiss Monetary History, 1848 to i860 26 Chapter IV — The Coinage Difficulties Leading to tlie Formation of the Latin Union, 1860-1865 - - 33 Chapter V — The Monetary Convention of 1865 42 Chapter VI — French Influences Dominant in the Formation of the Latin Union 55 Chapter VII — The Suspension of Specie Payment in Italy and its Effect on the Latin Union - 61 Chapter VIII — Popular Dissatisfaction and the International Monetary Confer- ence of 1867 71 Chapter IX — Coinage and the Ratio, 1865 to 1870 85 Chapter X — The Monetary Question in France, 1867 to JJ570 94 Chapter XI — The Latin Union and the Franco- Prussian War, 1870 to 1872 108 Chapter XII — First Steps Toward the Gold Standard, 114 Chapter XIII — The Convention of 1874 132 Chapter XIV — The Period of Coinage Restriction, 1874 to 1878 - 143 Chapter XV — The Conference of 1878 181 Chapter XVI — Italy and the Treaty of 187S 193 Chapter XVII — The Period of Suspension of Silver Coinage, 1882 to 1884 198 Chapter XVIH— The Treaty of 1885 216 Chapter XIX — The Period of Compulsory Redemption and the Conference of 1893, 1886 to 1894 - 236 Chapter XX — Present Condition and Future Prospects of the Latin Monetary Union - 253 APPENDICES. Appendix I — The Treaties of the Latin Monetary Union, 1865 to 1897 271 Appendix II — General Coinage Figures for Countries of the Latin Monetary Union 30 1 Appendix III — Bibliography 314 CHARTS. Chart I — Ratio of Silver to Gold by Months 86 Chart II — Coinage of France, Belgium, and Italy 87 Chart III — Coinage of Silver S-Franc Pieces in Latin Union 88 Chart IV — French Exports and Imports of Gold and Silver 89 Chart V — Metallic Stock, Bank of France 90 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION CHAPTER I. MONETARY HISTORY OF FRANCE, 1803-1860. In studying the monetary history of France during the pres- ent century, it is convenient to recognize two main periods. The first covers the years from the passage of the law of 1803 to the limitation of the coinage of silver in 1873, and the abroga- tion, in 1876, of the right of free coinage. The second extends from 1876 to the present time. It is further to be noted that the first period consists of two epochs, one lasting from 1803 to 1848 and characterized by the almost exclusive use of silver as a circulating medium, the other presenting an abrupt transition from silver to gold, during the decade 1848-1858, and, subse- quent to 1858, a comparative disuse of silver up to the last years of the period. This complete revolution in the monetary habits of France, effected in the short space of ten years, was due directly to the new gold which was enabled to effect an entrance into the cir- culation through the operation of the law of 1803. The ratio of 155^ : i, established by the law of 1803, was, at the time of the passage of the law, nearly in accord with the relative market value of the two metals. From 1801-1804 (inclu- sive) the ratio was constantly below 15^^:1, from 1 805-1 81 3 it was nearly always above that figure, and from 18 14-18 19 it was again continually below. After 1820, the ratio rose above 15 J^: i and continued so, up to the time of the gold discoveries.' No study of the changes in output, or supply, of the precious metals can here be undertaken. But, even if no account of such variations be made, it will still appear that alterations in demand must have been influential. From the demand side of the equation, the change in the relative value of gold and silver subsequent to 1820 maybe traced to three considerable changes in monetary desires, manifested by: 'Laughlin, History of Bimetallism in the United States. Appendix II, pp. 222, 223. HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION 1. The adoption of the gold standard in England (1816) . 2. The action of Holland in raising the ratio to 1:15.873 (1816). 3. The action of the United States in raising the ratio to 1:16 (1834). Inasmuch as gold was more valuable in the market than at the French mint, relatively to silver, it was impossible that gold should circulate in France until there should be some change in the ratio. Such a change did not occur until shortly after 1848, when alterations in the conditions of production of the precious metals lowered the market ratio to a point below the mint equivalence of I^j4:i. Nevertheless, during the whole period 1803-1848, the law of 1803 continued in practically unimpeded operation.' It naturally resulted from the undervaluation of gold by France, from 1803 to 1848, that it was hoarded or exported in considerable quantities, while, on the other hand, large amounts of silver flowed in to take its place. The following table dis- plays the effect of the law of 1803 in driving out gold up to 1848, and after that date in driving out silver : FRENCH IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF PRECIOUS METALS, 1815-1875. (in millions of francs.) GOLD SILVER GOLD AND SILVER IMPORTS EXPORTS EXCESS IMPORTS EXPORTS EXCESS 2 Diff. in 1 CO 2 e2 a d 3 ■a B a p2 a c 6 1 "0 2 a e (3 a. B 24 59 129 95 161 116 147 189 89 161 191 21 99 94 54 13 1642 1 1815 31 49 112 112 88 no 126 186 201 244 251 lit 208 148 220 220 132 199 192 136 116 7 155 53 155 89 138 177 57 106 83 135 175 40 29 59 59 29 III 100 i°3 1817 1818 43 1819 28 51 125 JL14 124 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 43 75 102 39 94 65 4 39 143 126 142 18 12 18 .... 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 48 24 14 36 25 5 24 38 14 53 12 32 25 58 10 10 24 39 7 20 14 172 196 liS 163 167 131 92 1450 21 15 58 88 66 57 65 4t8 151 181 60 75 loi 74 27 1032 Total 396 410 85 99 3442 2040 230' 'The period from 1803-1860 includes no epocli-malcing monetary act. MONETARY HISTORY OF FRANCE FRENCH IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF PRECIOUS METALS, 1815-1875. \_Contz7itted,'] (in millions of francs.) GOLD SILVER GOLD AND SILVER IMPORTS EXPORTS EXCESS IMPORTS EXPORTS EXCESS Diff. in S sa ^ c: ^ ^ B w to a C 2 a a c 13 s 13 P. 8, HE i2 X K s 144 X J 1,8 n u H n u H w tq 23 U 145 H 168 I U 23 H 24 w w 1837 6 23 20 22 13 35 6 197 59 3 16 19 10 13 23 4 23 131 154 2 32 34 120 173 57 116 1839 7 3b 43 19 19 24 15 117 132 5 52 57 75 175 7b 99 1840 ID 49 59 I 9 10 49 21 139 160 27 37 04 96 2ig 74 145 1841 4 II 15 7 13 20 5 19 151 170 16 37 53 117 185 73 112 1842 2 6 8 12 8 20 12 29 109 138 II 35 46 92 146 66 80 1843 3 7 10 2b 25 51 41 39 118 157 9 45 54 103 167 105 62 1844 2 3 5 5 6 II 6 44 107 151 18 51 69. 82 156 80 76 1845 3 2 5 13 6 19 14 46 113 159 14 55 6g 90 164 88 7b 1846 4 4 8 12 5 17 9 26 81 107 14 46 60 47 "5 77 38 1847 5 lb 21 9 25 34 13 49 Sg 138 17 68 85 53 159 119 40 1848 5 39 44 3 3 6 38 39 373 194 1494 233 1867 I 135 i« 499 19 634 214 1233 277 25 252 1234 Total 54 212 266 120 14s 265 III no 2133 899 1849 5 7 12 I 5 6 6 62 229 291 3 44 47 244 203 53 2.50 1850 30 31 Ol 32 12 44 17 25 130 155 10 72 82 73 216 126 go 1851 22 04 lib 14 17 31 85 21 158 179 33 68 lOI 78 295 132 ib3 1852 19 40 59 II 31 42 17 22 158 180 28 155 .83 3 239 225 14 1853 2ftl 58 3iq 6 24 30 28g 17 gb 113 41 i8g 230 117 432 260 172 1854 368 113 481 Q 5b 65 416 12 88 100 73 igi 264 164 581 329 2S2 1855 275 106 381 5 158 163 218 43 78 121 77 241 318 197 502 481 21 1856 273 igs 4b, I 8g go 375 12 g8 no 139 255 394 .... 284 575 484 gi 1857 291 278 5b9 3 120 123 446 18 80 98 152 306 45S 3bo 667 581 86 1858 2S3 30J 554 I b5 6b 488 IS 14b 161 98 78 170 15 715 242 473 1859 358 3b9 727 5 183 188 539 12 199 211 190 192 382 171 938 570 368 Total 2155 1589 3744 88 760 848 2896 259 1460 1719 844 1 791 2635 395 1311 5363 3483 1980 i860 279 191 470 32 127 159 311 12 tig 131 146 142 288 157 601 447 154 1861 17 227 244 58 210 268 24 21 151 J71 So 154 234 63 416 502 86 1862 up 281 402 42 I9S 237 165 28 104 132 116 102 218 86 534 455 79 1863 83 287 370 86 272 358 12 28 133 161 126 103 220 68 531 587 1864 no 354 4b4 33 306 339 125 64 204 268 134 176 310 42 732 649 82 186s 96 323 419 5b 213 269 150 94 247 142 853 236 1099 93 695 71 748 164 1443 72 72 416 655 433 3073 222 537 Total 704 1665 2369 307 1323 1630 763 24 3469 142 1866 169 644 813 68 280 348 465 75 175 250 III 94 20s 45 1063 553 , 510 1867 22^ 3bq 594 43 142 185 409 70 184 254 4b 19 65 i8g 848 250 5g8 1868 200 293 493 30 251 281 212 64 129 193 27 57 84 log 686 365 321 1869 l?7 2gS 455 3b 144 180 275 04 129 193 37 44 81 IT2 648 261 387 1870 59 241 310 100 277 91 908 19' iiSs 119 1480 .__ 32 305 74 691 106 996 20 247 45 259 71 506 35 490 m: 416 262 154 Total 820 184s 2665 3661 1691 1970 1871 8 136 144 3 355 358 214 47 no 157 18 124 142 15 301 500 199 1872 19 123 142 b 189 195 53 54 187 241 16 123 130 102 383 334 49 1873 38 138 17b 8 276 284 loS 202 3°3 187 484 389 787 15 49 193 440 208 489 181 298 ^^ 565 492 73 122 Total 65 397 462 17 820 837 375 1249 1326 199 1874 128 389 517 3 83 86 431 87 347 434 24 50 74 360 951 160 791 1875 212 34° 4138 381 770 6478 593 mo 26 29 838 "3 196 4152 139 225 5400 454 88s 6220 608 113 200 1687 ibb 513 5495 279 713 8631 34 58 2028 51 lOI 3838 85 159 6284 194 554 4074 1727 872 224 648 Total 1823 384 1439 Genl. Total 11012 21140 12896 8924 571 See Enquete sur la Circulation nionetait'e et fidutiaire de iSbq (Paris), vol. vi. pp. 534, 535. Report frovt Select Committee on Depreciatio^i of Silver, 1876, Appendix, pp. 86, 87 (after the official customs returns). 4 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Thus, SO far as the figures for the period 1803-1836 are com- plete, it is seen that the exports of gold were in excess of the imports. Up to 1837 exports of gold amounted to 410 million francs and imports to 396, while silver imports were 1450 millions, and silver exports 418 millions, leaving a net import of 1032 millions of francs in silver, and a net export of 14 millions in gold. There is, furthermore, reason to believe that the exports of gold consisted chiefly of coin, while the imports of gold were largely of bullion. At all events, by 1848 the gold coin of France (estimated by Gaudin in 1803 at one-third the total coin circulation of Fratice) had almost wholly disappeared.' ' Important testimony on this point is yielded by the Enquiie sur la Question monltaire (Conseil Sup^rieur du Commerce, de I'Agriculture et de I'Industrie): Paris, 1872. "In 1808 the metallic circulation of France was valued at 800 millions of gold and about two milliards of silver, . . . but everyone admits that in 1838 .... the whole of the French circulation did not include more that 200 millions of gold, or scarcely 5 per cent, out of a total circulation of four milliards" (vol. i. p. 562). Thus, in 1838, not over 200 million francs of gold were in circulation. In 1848, however, the movement had reached a considerably more developed stage. " After the law of Germinal, An. XI, France had no gold monetary circulation during the period before 1850. Up to that time silver was our sole monetary circulation, but after the gold discoveries of California and Australia, gold took the place of silver in the general monetary circulation of the country " (vol. ii. p. 396). A more precise statement is furnished by the Rapport de la Commission chargSe d'Atudier la Question de V&talon monetaire (t/Liaistkre des Finances) which reported in 1869: "According to the report of Gaudin, dated 26 Brumaire, An. XI (1803), France at that time had one third of its coin circulation in gold. In 1848, almost all of this gold had disappeared. Out of 53 millions then (1848) possessed by the bank only one million was in gold. This metal had disappeared because from 1808-1848 it had enjoyed a premium which reached, at times, 1.50 per cent." (p. 32). The " Enquete of 1858," established for the purpose of studying the monetary question, affords the following testiraony (Documents relatifs a la Question monetaire, p. 8., Ministfere des Finances 1858) : " People were not slow to perceive that the law of the year XI had attributed to gold a nominal value inferior to its commercial value ; gold reached a premium, was sought in the market, and became quite rare in the circulation. In 1838, MM. Dumas and de Colmont expressed the opinion that the relation of gold to silver was in fact i ; 15.75." See also Journal des £conomistes, i860, i, i. p. 393 : " Everyone recalls perfectly that gold coin under the Restoration and under Louis Philippe gained in current cir- culation a premium of from i to 1.5 per cent. Gold was thus in fact and in the rigorous sense of the word " demonetized," and we insist on this point because it indi- cates the subordinate role played by gold coin." If more testimony is desired the reader may consult the six large volumes (now quite scarce) entitled KnquHe sur . ... la Circulation jnonHaire et fidticiaire, Paris, 1866, as follows: Vol. ii. p. 356, vol. iv. p. 218, vol. iv. p. 232, vol. iv. p. 372, vol. iv. p. 391, vol. iv. p. 397, vol. iv. p. 467, vol. iv. p. 561, vol. iv. p. 693, vol. iv. p. 924, vol. ii. p. 590, vol. iv. pp. 429, 430, 457, 546, 694, 708, 947, 964, 486, 487, 709. MONETARY HISTORY OF FRANCE 5 Many other facts attest the accuracy of this statement. Dur- ing the period 1803-1848 comparatively little gold was coined. The following is a summary of the French coinage of gold and silver, 1795-1847,:' Gold Silver 1,186,189,220 francs 3,990,675,971 " 5,176,865,191 22,811,331 francs 76,743.768 " Total Thus the annual average coinage is : Gold Silver During the eighteen years ending 1848 the average is: Gold 11.995.155 francs Silver 97,237,402 " From 1795 to 1848, gold formed 22.9 per cent, of the coin- age, silver 77.1 per cent. From 1830-1848 silver was 89.1 per cent, and gold 10.9 per cent.° With the advent of the new gold, the aspect of things was completely changed. The coinage for the next eight years was as follows : Gold Total 1848 ■(849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 Total 39,697,740 27,109,560 85,192,390 269,709,570 27,028,270 312,964,020 526,528,200 447,427,820 508,281,995 572,561,225 488,689,635 702,697,790 119 206, 86 59 71 20; 2, 25: 54i 3 8 8 731,095 548,663 .458,485 327,308 .918,445 099,488 123,887 ,500,305 ,422,214 ,809,611 663,568 401,813 159,428,835 233,658,223 171,650,875 329,036,878 98,946,715 383,063,508 528,652,087 472,928,125 562,704,209 576,370,836 497,353.203 711,099,603 4.007, i '.215 667,004,882 4,674,893,097 This affords a striking contrast with the preceding period. The annual average up to 1857 was 249,325,507 francs gold and 71,781,099 francs silver, or 77.6 per cent, gold and 22.4 per cent, silver. Never since 1795 had less silver been coined than in 1854.3 ' Levasseur, La Question de I'Or, p. 105. ^ Ibid. ^ Ibid. 6 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION The figures for exports and imports tell the same story. After 1852, the net imports of gold rose suddenly from 17 million francs to 289 millions, in 1854, to 416 millions, and finally in 1857, to 446 millions. From 1853-1857, France gained 1744 millions of gold. The movement of silver was, of course, the reverse. Up to 1852, it was imported in considerable quantities. In that year, however, the reaction set in. The excess of exportation for the year was three millions. In 1853 it was 117; in 1854, 164; in 1855, 197 ; in 1856, 284 ; in 1857, 360 millions. During the five years, 1853-1857, France lost 1125 millions of silver, an annual average of 225 millions. Thus the law of 1803 did not secure a "concurrent circu- lation" of gold and silver. It furnished a circulation com- posed of that metal which at the time happened to be the cheaper, the ratio of 15^^ : i being taken, of course, as the standard of comparison. From 1803-1848, this metal happened to be silver; from 1848-1858, it happened to be gold. The transition from a silver to a gold medium of exchange was gladly welcomed by the French people, who found the latter metal better suited than silver to the needs of their expanding commerce. " Despite the very profound change which had come about in the metallic circulation, in consequence of the inflow of gold and the departure of* silver, the public in general and commerce in especial did not manifest either anxiety for the present or apprehension for the future. They did not appear to suffer for they did not demand any remedy." ' It should not be understood from this statement that the change in the circulation passed for nothing in the minds of the ^Documents relalifs a la Question monetaire; Enquete de 1838 (Ministfere des Finances), p. 8. A striking commentary on the attitude of the Frencli people is found in the two large volumes containing the depositions of the principal financiers of France entitled Enquete sur la Question /?io}ietaire, Paris, 1872. One passage in the report reads : " Will the opposite evolution be as simple, and will the public lend itself voluntarily to the restoration of silver and the exodus of gold ? Assuredly not, and a change, the reverse of that which has occurred during the last twenty years would be sure to excite the most lively repugnance " (vol, i. p. 563). MONETARY HISTORY OF FRANCE 7 people at large, or that it aroused no discussion. The fact that the operation of the law of 1803 had resulted in the banishment of gold from France had for years been a subject of comment among French economists;' although the fact that the market ratio had experienced no severe fluctuations since 1803, had kept the alternating character of the standard established by the law from making itself apparent. When, therefore, it began to be well understood that France was undergoing a complete change in the nature of her stock of coin, it was not strange that great interest began to be displayed, and there was much speculation as to what the new gold might mean to the people. ° It is beyond the scope of the present investigation to enter into a detailed account of the influence of the new gold upon France during the decade following 1848-9. It sufifices to say that the beneficial character of the influence exerted by the new gold upon commerce, trade, and industry by affording a more convenient medium of exchange 3 is now generally recognized. In order, however, that we may well understand the subsequent monetary history of France and her allies it will be advantageous to furnish a brief statement of the general progress of the mone- tary controversy from 1 848-1 860, and of the governmental attempt to solve the problem of of the standard of value. Although it is not desired to discuss the character of the law of 7 Germinal, An. XI [1803], it will be necessary to men- tion at this point one or two of its salient features. Its sup- posed ambiguit}- has aroused considerable controversy.* By its "The law had never been regarded as a "bimetallic" law. On this point the collection of French documents, dating from 1785-1S03, made by Mr. Horton and reprinted in the International Monetary Conference Report 0/1878, pp. 241-327, may be consulted. 'As early as 1850 a Governmental Commission with M. Thiers at the head was instituted to study the monetary situation. Unfortunately no reports of the pro- ceedings have been preserved. Its investigations were fruitless (see Documents relatifs a la Question uionctaire, 1S6S, p. 6). 3 See e. g., Baudrillart, "Des Crises mon^taires et de la Question de I'Or," in Journal des Economistes, 1855, ii. I, pp. 360 et seq., for the current opinion on the subject. ■•See HoRTOX, ante cit. 8 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION principal provision, as expressed in the. Disposition gMrale , five grams of silver .goo fine were to constitute the franc. By a later article, it was further provided that gold coins of a specified number of francs were to be struck. The natural inference would seem to be that the "standard" intended to be established was manifestly silver, while gold was a possible auxiliary for use in large payments, the coins of this latter metal being regarded merely as stamped ingots.' Until 1848, the correctness of this position does not seem to have been doubted. But, with the influx of the new gold and the exit of silver, it was seen that gold was much more willingly received by creditors in payment of debts ; and, when recourse was had to the law of 1803, it was found that no especial stipulations in it pointed out either gold or silver as the sole legal tender. Thus, in some minds, there arose the belief that the law of 1803 had been intended to establish in France the double standard. At all events, it was perfectly clear that the terms of this law contained no provision which would absolutely prohibit the use of either of the two metals in liquidation of obligations. It naturally followed that when it became understood to what a degree the monetary question in France was putting itself "in the terms of an imperi- ous dilemma,"'' the economists and people in general divided into two parties, one favoring the so-called double standard, the other a currency based upon a single metal as the standard of value. It was not, of course, urged by anyone that the "double standard" would secure a concurrent circulation of gold and silver, for that, as everyone knew, and as has just been shown, had never been seen in France, although circumstances had pre- sumably been most favorable for its existence. On the contrary, quite the reverse was urged as the main argument in favor of bimetallism. But this possibility of an alternating standard was exactly what most strongly indicated to certain minds the neces- sity of taking some steps which should secure a permanently "Compare on this point Fontenay m Journal des £conomistes, l86o, i. 2, pp. 402 et seg., also Roulleaux, in Journal des &conomisies, 1858, i. i, pp. 242 et seq. * Parieu, \n Journal des ^conomistes^ i860, i. 2, p. i. MONETARY HISTORY OF FRANCE 9 Stable standard of value. Unfortunately, there was manifested among the advocates of monometallism a tendency to a division into two factions, one of which regarded silver as likely to be the most available standard, the other advocating the use of gold, for reasons which will presently be explained. There were thus three possible policies any one of which might be followed : 1 . To refrain from interfering with the status quo, allowing the law of 1803 to continue its practical alternating standard. 2. To demonetize silver. 3. To demonetize gold. In considering the first of these possibilities, it is interesting to note that, during the period immediately after the appearance of the new gold, little attention was devoted to bimetallism compared to that which was later bestowed upon it. Bimetallism has in fact always obtained its strongest hold when there has been a burden of depreciated metal to be disposed of. And, although it is true that many of the modern bimetallic argu- ments made their appearance during the later years of the period at present under discussion, it is especially noteworthy that they occupied by no means a very important place. In the course of the earlier years of the decade succeeding 1850, they attracted little attention. The main arguments for preserving the s3-stem of the law of 1803 were therefore those based on the fear of introducing a new and, in France, hitherto untried system of monometalism which might condemn the nation to a constantly depreciating standard of value should a mistake, in the selection of the metal to be demonetized, be made.' More forcible arguments were urged by the adherents of gold, and by those of silver, monometallism. As has been hinted, there was no fundamental ground of difference between these two latter schools. Both favored monometallism, and the only difference of opinion concerned the question which one of the two metals should be demonetized. Thus the monometallists 'Compare on this point Fontenay, "La Question monStaiie," Journal des ^conomhtes, i860, i. 2, pp. 398 et seq.; Parieu, "La Question monetaire Franjaise," Journal des Economisies, i860, i. 2, pp. 2 et seq.; also Documents relatifs a la Question monitaire, 1S58, pp. 39 et seq. 10 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION were the party of action, urging that the policy of hesitancy, represented by the bimetallists, should be abandoned. It is evident that there was, at this time, some room for argument upon the comparative merits of gold and silver as monetary standards. The controversy was warmly taken up by Levasseur,' Chevalier,^ Wolowski,3 and numerous others. Attempts were made to show that gold was essentially better fitted than silver for use as a medium of exchange, while it was argued that the increased annual supply since 1850 was likely, not to be greatly augmented or diminished, but to remain tolerably constant for a period of years to come ;■* while, on the other hand, it was clearly demon- strated that France had already undergone a change so violent that no further movement of the kind would be possible. ^ The reply to these arguments was based principally upon efforts to show the unreliable character of the predictions concerning the future of gold. Gold had, relatively to silver, already suffered a fall, and it was urged that, should this fall continue, the country would find its standard of value constantly depreciating. In other words, it was argued that silver, and not gold, was the metal which would be likely in future to possess the desirable characteristic of stability.^ As against the argument of the greater convenience of gold in large payments, it was urged by the more extreme that a depreciation of gold which would place its value absolutely below that of silver was by no means an impossibility ; while moderate partisans of silver argued that greater convenience in the medium of exchange should in no case be purchased by a sacrifice of stability in the standard of value. Further, it was thought that the inconveniences aris- ing from the use of silver might be overcome by the introduc- tion of the cheque system, and Saint Andre tried to show' that ^ La Question de V Or. ^ La Baisse probable de V Or. 'L'Oret r Argent. ^ 'itt Journal des Aconojnistes, 1857, ii. I, pp. 279 et seq. ^Journal des Economistes, 1856, ii. 2, pp. 474 et seq. '■See Chevalier, Za Baisse probable de I 'Or, and Fontenay, "l.a Question mon^taire, \n Journal des Rconomistes, i860, i. 2, pp. 291 et seq. ' Description et Usages du Mode de Payement par Cheques, etc., Paris, 1S58. MOXEXARY HISTORY OF FRANCE I I in any event this credit system could, and ought to be, introduced into France. But to all arguments of the silver party the reply was made that France had actually substituted gold for silver, and the people were well satisfied with the change. To demon- etize gold would be to throw business transactions into the greatest disorder and make the monetary system a chaos. Curiously enough, this state of affairs led to the recommendation of precisely the same remedy with regard to the depreciated gold as has, at the present time, been adopted by France and the Latin Union for silver. It was proposed that the coinage of gold be merely suspended, and that the alread}- existing gold coin be maintained in circulation as legal mone)' ; while, if the law of 1803 continued in force, silver would still constitute the standard, and all future coinage would be of that metal.' But inconvenience arising from a scarcit)" of small coin now began to be felt. A double outlet was, in fact, offered for the subsidiary money. Those coins which were still in good con- dition and had lost little by abrasion were, of course, almost as likely to be exported as the five-franc pieces, since they were of the same fineness. But, owing to the fact that Belgium had adopted the French coinage system, even the French worn pieces could now be advantageoush^ exported to take the place of the Belgian coin. This movement and the continued demand for governmental action on the monetary- question, led the administration, in 1858, to appoint a commission,'' whose duty it should be, after a study of the subject, to recommend such measures as would be likely to obviate the existing difficulties. On the 7th of February, the members of the commission were named by the Minister of Finance, M. Magne, in an Arret^^ which outlined the object of the investigators as being "to seek out the principal reasons for the monetary situation . . . and ' Chevalier, Baisse probable de VOr, and Roulleaux, " Legislation mong- taiie," m/otimal des Economistes, 1858, i. i, pp. 244 et seq. ' Commission Chargee d'Etudier la Situation moneiaire (Paris, 1858). 'Documents relatifs a la Question moneiaire, 185S, p. I, for text of the Arrete and accompanying documents. 12 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION to give an opinion on the solution, which the general interests of the country may demand." The report of the "Commission of 1858" summed up briefly the monetary history of France prior to 1850,' and enlarged upon the profound change in the French circulation, due to the appearance of the new gold. It considered the causes of the movement of silver out of France to be not only the immensely increased production of gold, but also the extraordinary demands of commerce for silver to be used in the trade with the East, where western products were not extensively used, and silver was chiefly desired for hoarding. In this connection the possi- bility that the alteration in the relative value of the two metals might be due to a rise in the value of silver rather than to a fall in that of gold, was discussed, and the commission, while recog- nizing the difficulty of a decision on so knotty a point, professed the belief that gold had not fallen.^ "If, then," said the report, /'there has been on one side an increasing production of gold, there is, on the other, a correlative progression in business ; and several members of the commission would appear even inclined to believe that there is scarcity rather than redundancy of the circulating medium."^ The rise in the value of silver was explained by reference to commercial conditions, but the com- mission expressed the hopeful opinion that, while causes which had led to the rise of silver seemed to be of a durable nature, those which had rendered possible the increased production of gold would soon lose their force. Thus they would expect that a reaction would soon set in, in the course of which the demand for gold would restore a 'market ratio approximately the same as that fixed by the law of 1803, and it was pointed out that this rise would render a choice between the two metals less hazardous. The use of gold had been productive of great benefits to trade,'' and the effect of the "rise of silver" in "rais- ing the value of all French capital," was thought to be a matter of congratulation. ' Rapport dela Commission Chargee d'Etudierla Situation monltaire (1858), pp. 7-14. 'Ibid., pp. 18, 19. ^Iliid., p. 23. * Ibid., p. 23 et seq. MONETARY HISTORY OF FRANCE 1 3 Nevertheless, the commission believed that the movement had been accompanied by some inconveniences : 1. To the treasury; 2. To the bank ; 3. To commerce. The most important of the disadvantages accruing to the treasury was the necessity, arising from the export of subsidiary coin, of buying silver for the purpose of coining additional supplies.' This could hardly help being a considerable expense. Under the second head, was urged the danger to the bank from a reserve composed of gold instead of silver. This arose from the greater portability of gold, and consequently its easier withdrawal, which might cause serious fluctuations in the reserve, and con- sequently in the rate of discpunt. '^ The difficulties which, it was thought, might be experienced by commerce from the disappear- ance of silver were chiefly those arising from the necessity of purchasing at a premium silver ingots to be used in the trade with the East. Before coming to specific propositions, the report attempted to discuss the possibilities of monetary action. It rejected the bimetallic principle, declaring that "it is as impossible to have two monetary standards as it is to have two units of length or weight." 3 On the proposition to lower the valuation placed upon gold relatively to silver at the mint, it discussed the prob- able demand for and supply of gold, and showed that a change in the legal ratio would be quite in accordance with the principle involved in the law of 1803 ; but it urged as an objection to this course of action the expense of recoinage, which would neces- sarily fall upon the state, unless the loss should be thrown upon the present holders of gold, a step which was not to be thought of. The idea of periodically altering the mint ratio to corre- spond with that of the market was out of the question, since this would be sure to throw the circulation into constant disorder. At all events if, as had been decided, the scarcity of silver came about largely from the demands of eastern trade, there •■Ibid., p. 24. 'Ibid., p. 25. ^Ibid., p. 28. 14 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION was no reason to suppose that a change in the ratio to market value would bring it back.' The proposal to retain gold and reduce silver to the condition of token money did not meet with a better fate at the hands of the commission. The recommenda- tions of the commission merely outlined an "expectant policy" as a fundamental basis ; but they also went a step farther. It was suggested that a high tariff be placed upon the export of silver, and stringent enactments against money speculators^ were recommended as a supplement to the new tariff. Finally, a coinage of gold five-franc pieces to take the place of the old silver coins of the same denomination was advised. ^ None of the suggestions were officially acted upon, and the problem remained essentially unchanged in character.* ■ Ibid., p. 34. ^ Ibid., pp. 44, 45. ^ Ibid. ••"This measure" [that proposed by the Commission of 1858] "being of little efficacy, and contrary to true economic principles, was not executed, and silver con- tinued to leave France for the Orient, vphere it enjoyed a heavy premium." — Rapport ds la Commission Charges d^Ktudier la Question m-onetaire, Paris, l86g, p. 3. " After having examined the proposals, vphich recommended that the system based upon the retention of silver money and reduction in value of the gold money, and, on the other hand, the system recommending the adoption of the gold standard and the reduction of the silver coin to the condition of token money, it has not settled either one of these two questions." — Commission monetaire de 1867 (Paris, 1867), Prods Verbaux et Rapport, p. 6. " This commission adopted no solution involving a principle. ... It proposed a tariff, an export duty on the outflow of silver. This method had public opinion against it. It was not adopted, and the status quo was maintained." — Enquete sur la Question monetaire, i8y3 (Paris, 1872), vol. i. pp. 12, 13. CHAPTER II. BELGIAN MONETARY HISTORY, 1832-1862. The political independence acquired by Belgium in 1831, at the time of her separation from Holland, was followed by a change in her monetary system. For years her industrial rela- tions with France had been of the most intimate nature and it was not her policy to render the relationship less cordial. It was thus natural that when Belgium abolished the old Dutch coinage in 1832, she should adopt in its place that of France. By the law of 1832, Belgium became, from a monetary point of view, "a satellite of France."' B}- that law she adopted in its entirety the monetary system of France' and e\'en went so far as to give to the French gold pieces of 20 and 40 francs, and to the French silver five-franc pieces the quality of legal tender in Belgium. The essential stipulations of the law were briefly these : 1. Five grams of silver nine tenths fine constituted the mone- tary unit which was called the franc. 2. The subsidiary coins, also nine tenths fine, were to be the same as those of France. 3. The national gold coin was to be the 20-franc piece and one kilogram of gold was to be coined into 155 of these pieces. These provisions were precisely those of the French law of 1803. Whether that law was bimetallic in its chaaacter or not, there resulted from its operation to 1S47 i^^ Belgium, as in France, an exclusively silver circulation. ^ During the years "■Report United States i\Iomtary Commission, 1S76, p. 144. ° Horn, Journal des Etonomistes, 1S59, vol. ii. 2, p. 107. 3 " Belgium," said M. Horn (ibid.), "had for fifteen years allowed the clause of the monetary law of 1832 which authorized the emission of gold coins of 20 and 40 francs, to be a dead letter ; silver alone performed the function of money. The law of 1S32 had indeed given a legal circulation to the French gold coin, but the premium which at that time existed on this coin, because its market value exceeded its mint IS 1 5 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION 1 832-1 847, it operated uninterruptedly in Belgium, and under it 25.4 millions of francs in silver were coined, but not a single gold piece.' It only remains to add that the Dutch lo-florin gold pieces had, during these fifteen years, continued to have a legal- tender quality in Belgium, by weight, at the equivalence of 21 francs and 16 centimes in silver. To recapitulate, the various coins legally recognized were these : 1. Belgian silver coins. 2. Belgian gold pieces of 20 and 40 francs. 3. Dutch gold lo-florin pieces. 4. French gold pieces of 20 and 40 francs. 5. French silver 5 -franc pieces. Of these categories the second, as we have seen, never actu- ally existed. The scantiness of the Belgian exports and imports of gold leads us to the belief that Dutch and French gold had a very limited circulation in Belgium, while the inadequacy of the silver coinage (25.4 million) together with the compara- tively large import figures for silver justify us in the opinion that French silver had an extended circulation there.'' A new monetary era opened for Belgium in 1847. The scarcity of money, or the patriotic desire for a national gold coinage, or a belief that an element of gold in the currency would be of advantage to business (if combined with the silver currency) led the Belgian Chambers to adopt a succession of measures looking to the introduction of gold. The legislation value (15 J^ X its weight in silver) prevented it from circulating in Belgium, as it was prevented from circulating even in France." At the official Conference Beige institute pour I'Examen de la Question mon^- taire {^Documents relatifs a la Question monitaire recueillis par M. J. Malou, Bruxelles 1874, p. 263), M. Malou, detailing the monetary history of Belgium, said: "It has nn various occasions been proved that the law of Germinal, An. XI, established in reality the single silver standard." M. Pirmez, speaking on the same subject, said : " In fact the double standard never exists ; it is replaced by the alternating standard, since people always pay in silver when gold is at a premium and in gold when silver is, dear." ' Documents relatifs a la Question monitaire recueillis par M. J. Malou, Bruxelles 1874, pp. 50,51; also, Bulletin de Statistique et de Legislation Comparie, 1878, vol. i. p. 324. ' This is also attested by the Documents monitaires officiels Beiges, p. 73 et seq. BELGIAN MONETARY HISTORY I "J seems to have been of a very haphazard character. The law of March 31, 1847, provided for a national legal-tender gold coin- age of 10 and 25-franc pieces.^ It was ordered that the 25-franc piece, nine tenths fine, should weigh 7.91556 grams. This was equivalent to a new mint ratio of i : 15.83 and was, therefore, a rather striking departure from the old "bimetallic" ratio of i: iS-5- The gold coinage, however, was to be issued by the government alone and was limited to 20 millions of francs, but the minting of the 20-franc piece at the old ratio was not pro- hibited. ° Under this law there were coined, during the three years succeeding its passage, 14.6 million francs in gold, while the coinage of silver under the law of 1832 during, the same years aggregated 80.6 millions. 3 'On March 4, 1848, Bel- gium attempted to impose the legal-tender quality on the English sovereign, giving to it a legal equivalence of 25 francs 50 centimes,'' when its market value was but 25 francs 22.5 centimes, a pre- mium of about I.I per cent. As the English sovereign weighed 7.981 grams and had a fineness of 916 thousandths, the law of March 4th practically established a third ratio of 1:15.69666. Under this law, speculators imported into Belgium English sov- ereigns to the value of about 30 million francs, and exported silver to a corresponding amount. s Such were the methods of Belgium's attempt to secure a gold currency. It will now be necessary to go back a year and consider the course of extra-legal monetary events. We have already noted that Dutch lo-florin and French 20 and 40-franc pieces were legal tender in Belgium, but had had only a very limited circulation ' A similar law had been introduced ten years before, in 1837, but had failed to pass. See ibid., p. 77. ° For criticisms adverse to the law see Chevalier, in ibid., p. 78. 3 These issues were for the most part hoarded. See ibid. ■• The government had proposed the rate of 25 francs 30 centimes, the special commission that of 25 francs 40 centimes. It was raised to 25 francs 50 centimes, because of the high rate of exchange current. Exchange at the time of the passage of the law was quoted at from 26 to 27 francs. It was not long before it suffered a heavy fall, and, as stated in the text, went to 25 francs 22.5 centimes. 5 See Documents monitaires officieh Beiges, ante cit. I» HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION up to 1847. ^^ that year, two events occurred which led to a change in this respect. November 26th, Holland demonetized gold, and the lo-florin pieces, which were liberated in considera- ble amounts, flowed into Belgium. In that year, France likewise was just beginning to feel the effects of the increased production of Russian gold which had begun about 1840. France coined an increased quantity of gold which took the place of a cor- responding amount of silver. As Belgium gave the legal-tender quality to the French 20 and 40-franc pieces, she was supplied with some of the new French gold coin about the same time that gold was being so largely imported from Holland, thus obtain- ing a supply of gold from two distinct sources. In 1849, then, the gold monetary system of Belgium included the following different components : 1. The French 20 and 40-franc pieces representing the old ratio of I : 15.5. 2. The English sovereign, representing the ratio of 1:15.- 69666. 3. The Dutch lo-florin piece, admitted at a fixed value of 21 francs 16 centimes. 4. The native Belgian 10 and 25-franc pieces representing* the ratio of i : 15.83. Belgium' had, however, hardly taken these measures to secure a gold coinage when the Chambers became frightened, either at the large amounts of gold which were entering the country, .or at the fact that French gold pieces which had always stood at a premium of 1.2 or 1.5 per cent, prior to 1848, lost, during 1850, about 2 per cent, of their original value. September 28, 1849, the Chambers passed a law whereby the English sovereign was deprived of its legal-tender quality.' The sovereigns were redeemed by the government at their face value, the operation resulting in a slight profit to the public treasury ,° and an amount of them equal in value to 18.2 millions of francs were with- drawn. 3 The pessimistic predictions as to the future of gold as ' See Moniteur Beige of September 30, 1849. ' See ibid., p. 83. 3 Documents relatifs a la Question monetaire recueillis par M. J. Malou, pp. 262, 263. BELGIAN MONETARY HISTORY IQ a money metal, that had all along been made by the econo- mists were now renewed, and the Chambers, yielding to their own fears as well as to popular opinion, passed a law, June 14, 1850, whereby the Dutch lo-florin gold pieces were also deprived of their legal-tender quality. The government, however, con- tinued for eight days to receive them in payment of taxes at the rate of 20 francs 90 centimes. As their former equivalence had been 21 frarics 22.5 centimes in the market and 21 francs 16 centimes as a legal tender in payment of debts, it is easily seen that the rate at which the government received them was low enough to render unprofitable an importation of these coins for payment to the government. The rate at which the government continued to receive them was in fact pretty nearly equal to their market value at the lowered ratio of gold to silver. On December 28, 1850, French gold was, in the same way, deprived of its legal-tender quality by the Belgian law of that date.' This was, of course, purely a formal measure, inasmuch as neither French nor Belgian gold was in circulation. At the same time, silver was recognized as the sole standard, "the chambers voted the complete suppression of the gold currency,"'' and the coinage of gold completely ceased. The last measure of the series was the royal decree of August 11, 1854, which demone- tized the gold coins struck under the law of March 31, 1847, and about 12 millions of francs of these coins were recei\ed by the treasury in paj-ment of taxes. This left onl)- 2.6 millions still presumably in circulation. This ended the second period of Belgium's monetary history subsequent to 1832. The measures passed by the chambers, as just explained, seemed to many entirely wise. In 1850, Switzer- land, Naples, Spain, India, and other states also pursued the policy of demonetization of gold. Nevertheless, the policy did not result in securing for Belgium monetary peace. The third period of Belgium's monetary history opened in '^Journal lies Bconomistes, 1859, vol. ii. part 2, pp. 107 et seq. Also, Documents 7no}ietaires oifficiels Beiges he. cit. ^Report United States Monetary Commission, 1876, pp. 145 et seq. 20 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION 1851. She was now on the silver basis. French silver five- franc pieces were still legal tender in Belgium, while the Belgian gold coins had ceased to be struck, and those gold coins still in circulation were soon to be retired (see above). In order to understand the events of the decade 1850-1860 in Belgium, it is necessary to recollect clearly the nature and condition of the stocks of money on hand in both France and Belgium. Belgium had coined, between 1832 and 1853, about 160 million francs in silver and about 14.6 million francs in gold.' It is likely that in 1853, this stock of silver remained almost all in existence as coin, although some of it had crossed the frontier into France, arid a much larger amount of French silver had, in the course of trade, been brought into Belgium.^ The Belgian stock of silver was not much worn and was, in general, in excellent condition. France, like Belgium, still had a circulation largely composed of silver, but, unlike the latter, this circulation contained worn and abraded coin. France's best coin circulated in the provinces, where it did not undergo much wear; while the circulation of Paris, on the contrary, contained the oldest and poorest coin in the country. It is only necessary to recall that the Belgian coin was struck under the same conditions of weight and fineness as the French, so that the face values of the two were precisely equivalent, and we can completely understand' subsequent events. The problem now about to be solved was this : Was it possible for Belgium to maintain a single silver standard beside the French nominally double, but really single, gold standard ? The course of events in France is familiar. The process of displacing silver with gold had begun in that country, to some extent, in 1847, and, even so early as that, it had had an obscure influence on Belgium. We have already noted that, between 1832 and 1848, the Belgian silver coinage had amounted to 25.6 millions, that there had been no gold coinage, and that between 1847 a-'^d 1850 the coinage of silver had leaped to 80.6 millions, ^Bulletin de StatistiQue et de Legislation Comfarle, 1878, vol. i. p. 324. ^Documents relatifs a la Qicesiion nionStaire recueillis par M.. J. Malou, pp. 176, 177. BELGIAN MONETARY HISTORY 21 or more than three times its amount for the preceding fifteen years, although the period from 1847-1850 was the time when Belgium was making strenuous and measurably successful efforts to secure a gold currency. In 1847, when the Russian gold began to flow into France and displace silver the French silver coinage was reduced in volume. Belgium could no longer rely on French silver coin for her circulation, and was forced to resort to her own mint. Hence the increase in Belgian silver coinage subsequent to 1847. -^n abundant silver coinage continued to be minted up to 1854. By that time, the value of gold had sunk sufficiently low to render a further coinage of silver unprofitable in Belgium, and it therefore practically ceased. Silver, however, must be had for necessary payments and for the daily use of a population not so wealthy as the French. The reason why silver coinage ceased after 1853 was this: French silver five- franc pieces could be brought in France for gold, shipped to Belgium, and used for the needs of business at a lower cost than that at which the Belgian five-franc pieces could be struck. Owing to this simple commercial fact, there was practically no silver coinage in Belgium from 1854-1865, only about 263,000 francs being minted (and that in small fractional coin). But the process did not cease with merely supplying Belgium's needs for silver at a lower cost than that at which she could herself supply them through her mint. This was only the beginning of the movement of silver from France into Belgium. France's silver circulation was being collected, melted, and exported by the speculators. In this operation the newer and less worn coins were naturally the first to disappear. As they became scarce, recourse was had to Belgium, whether many of the French coins had been drawn and where the native circulation was not much worn. French gold was no longer legal tender in Belgium. But as much of the French silver coin had lost fully 8 per cent, of its value by wear, it was a very profitable operation to export this light-weight coin to Belgium, where it was still legal tender, exchange it for heavy Belgian coin, melt the latter, and re-export it to Holland and Germany, the two principal countries of the 2 2 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION single silver standard. In this way the better part of the silver circulation of Belgium was gradually exchanged for the abraded French coin. In 1850, the import of gold and silver into Bel- gium from France had been but six millions of francs. In 1851, this figure rose to 20.1 millions, and in 1854 to 52 millions; while in 1859 the imports of silver alone were 76.3 and those of gold 2.3 millions.' Although the import of gold from France was nearly always largely in excess of the export, yet the import of silver was so far in excess of the import of gold that it is evident that not gold, primarily, but the worn silver coinage of France was driving out the Belgian silver. As the operation went on and gold fell still somewhat lower, the very worst of the French silver was gradually drawn into Belgium. By 1859, the currency of Belgium was in a bad condition, and two com- missions, established to investigate the monetary problem,' reported that the loss from wear on the French silver coin varied from 3 francs J"] centimes to 8 francs 40 centimes per 1000 francs, and in some cases was even more serious. In 1859, it was estimated that the silver circulation of Belgium, consisting almost entirely of much-worn pieces, was composed of 70 per cent. French and 30 per cent. Belgian coin. Belgium, however, had yet to experience greater difficulties than ever before. Owing to the increasing premium on silver, even the abraded coins began to disappear and the lack of an adequate currency was severely felt. To meet this emergency, French gold, which had already been coming in to a considerable extent was imported in increased quantities. Although this gold was of assistance as a medium of exchange it nevertheless occa- sioned three kinds of annoyance to the people : 1. It was not a legal tender and had no debt-paying power. 2. Its market value was not equivalent to the face value of the silver currency at the existing ratio of gold to silver. 3. The denominations of the gold pieces were too large, for the most part, to admit their use in small transactions. ^Documents relatifsala Question f?ionetaire recueilHs par M..], MALOu,pp. 176, 177. ° See Rapport diposi par M. le Ministre des Finances a la chambre des Repre- sentants, Slance du 20 Aoiit, 1859, No. l!i. BELGIAN MONETARY HISTORY 23 The first of these circumstances was a great impediment to business. The second was especially annoying to the ignorant population. Accustomed to consider four silver five-franc pieces equivalent in value to a gold 20-franc piece, they were easily induced to make the exchange, finding gold more convenient to carry or hoard ; but they were then enraged to find their gold subjected to a heavy discount by the " arbitragists." Finally, the lack of coin of small denominations was a serious hindrance to trade. The total circulation of Belgium was now about 87 per cent. French, and 13 per cent. Belgian, coin' A fluctuation in the ratio of gold to silver drew back into France, in i860, some of the French gold coin then circulating in Belgium. This intensified the annoyance caused by the lack of currency and, in response to popular demand, the Chambers, against the will of the finance minister, passed a law, June 4, 1861, by which the legal-tender quality was once more bestowed upon French gold pieces, and decreed the coinage of gold conformably to the French system." The hope was that this would put an end to the operations of the money speculators and provide a per- manent place for French gold in the Belgian monetary system. The law did, perhaps, have a tendenc)' to check monetary speculation within Belgium, but this was effected at a heavy cost, for the new quasi-bimetallism at once subjected Belgium to an alternating standard of value. Gold was not destined to fall 'Compare composition of the silver circulation as previously given. = The excitement over the measure was quite intense. M. Fr^re-Orban, the finance minister, resigned his position. There were two distinct parties, one favoring the "old standard and the other bimetallism. The program of the gold party was thus expressed by M. Nothomb in the Belgian House of Representatives, March i, 1861 : "For us the future has another solution, namely, that which Switzerland has adopted — the adoption of foreign moneys at their nominal value with a subsidiary coinage eight tenths fine. For the moment that is my monetary ideal ; I foresee in it monetary unity between France, Switzerland, Belgium, and probably Italy herself." {Journal des Economistes, 1886, vol. i. p. 285.) Had this suggestion been acted upon, the Belgian delegate, M. Pirmez, would have had no occasion to exclaim (Conf. Mon. entrela Belgique, la France, etc., Proch-Verbaux, 1885, p. 104), that his country was the victim of the Latin Union, since Belgium might, like Switzerland, have avoided risk arising from the possible depreciation of silver by making use of the French coinage. 24 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION much lower, and the abraded silver coins were so reduced in value that they were not likely to disappear by a steady process of exportation. Temporary fluctuations, therefore, were the principal reliance of the speculator. The alternating standard manifested itself (i) in the disturbance of the rate of interest, (2) in the progressive deterioration of the currency, and (3) in the losses thereby entailed upon business men. The main injury to the banking interests was the heavy strain to which the reserves of the Banque Nationale were subjected. It is quite possible that the geographical position of Belgium had an influence in intensifying the injurious action of an alternating standard." Surrounded as she was by countries some of which had a single gold and some a single silver standard, while the actual currencies frequently corresponded to neither, Belgium was in a position to feel most keenly the disastrous conse- quences of her alternating standard.^ Whenever a speculator found that the price of gold and silver was such that he could make a profit by shipping either metal to, or withdrawing it from, any of these countries of differing standards., he made the bank of Belgium the basis of operations, thus depleting its reserves or causing a plethora of coin as the case might be, as well as setting on foot a tendency to scarcity or redundancy of the circulating medium. In 1 86 1 the gold reserve of the Banque Nationale sank suddenly from 22 to 7 millions and the silver reserve rose as sharply from 1 1.5 to 17 millions, while the rate of discount fluctuated from 4.6 to 3 per cent. In December 1862, the gold reserve was 17, in the following February it had sunk to 9, and in the April ' " Belgium," remarked M. Kreglinger, in a speech delivered at the opening session of the first convention of the Latin Union, December 23, 1865, "being placed between France, where gold has become in fact the real monetary standard, England, where gold is in law and fact the sole standard, Holland where silver is in law and fact also the sole monetary metal, and Germany where silver is the sole legal standard, but where gold nevertheless obtains a very important effective circulation, is naturally called to serve as ground of union between these different countries for their monetary transactions.'' Conference monHaire entre la Belgique^ la France^ etc.^ Proch- Verbaux; Seance i, 1865, pp. 21-22. » Ibid. BELGIAN MONETARY HISTORY 25 succeeding, it was 5 millions, while during the same time the reserve of silver five-franc pieces had risen but i million. About the same time, the bank was forced temporarily to cease payment in silver five-fran'c pieces,' for a sudden contrary move- ment reduced the reserve of silver five-franc pieces first to 5 and then to 2 millions, and the rate of discount fluctuated between 3 and 6 per cent., which were the extreme limits. ° In 1865 the rate of discount rose from 4 to 5.8 per cent., following a cor- responding movement in the reserve. During all this period, the normal rate was from 2.5 to 3 per cent., so that the incon- veniences undergone by the business public may readily be appreciated. Thus the reserves of the bank were now depleted on the gold and now on the silver side and sometimes on both. This was rendered even worse by the method of restoring the reserve. A delay was usually unavoidable, and this was pro- tracted as long as possible, until the rate of exchange was reversed, when it was profitable to send back the coin just with- drawn. The monetary system of Belgium subjected merchants to considerable losses in another way also. If it was necessar}- to pay a debt in a neighboring country of the silver standard, as Holland, for instance, the Belgian debtor found himself obliged to pay in silver, in addition to the amount of the debt, a sum sufficient to cover the loss on the worn coin. On the other hand he was at any time likely to be paid in much worn siher from which the less abraded pieces had been carefully sorted. This double loss must likewise be incurred in sending gold abroad to pay debts in states where the gold standard prevailed. In this state of things an additional circumstance began to have a deranging effect. The heavy demand for silver for export to the East during the two years just prior to 1865 bade fair finally to deprive Belgium of the little silver she had left. '■English Report on Depreciation of Silver, 1876, Appendix, pp. 102-106. ' Conference nionStaire entre la Belgique, la France, etc., Procis-Verbaux, Seance 1, 1865, and Documents relatifs a la Question monitaire, pp. 206 et seq. CHAPTER III. SWISS MONETARY HISTORY, 1848-1860. For the present purpose, it is unnecessary to study the mone- tary history of Switzerland farther back than 1848. Prior to that date, the great number and variety of the native monetary systems effectually precluded all mutual circulation of coin between the various cantons. No less than eleven monetary units might have been counted in Switzerland, including four different kinds of livres and seven kinds of florins, beside the French franc, which had been adopted by Geneva as early as 1838.' Moreover, many of the native systems had suffered debase- ment, and their coins were little more than tokens.' The situa- tion, in fact, very closely resembled that existing in Germany, prior to the creation of the monetary union of 1857, and the frequent struggles of individual cantons to introduce some improvement into the old systems only threw a more glaring light upon the fearful confusion everywhere obtaining. By the Bundesverfassmig of 1848, the cantons were, among other things, deprived of the old right to separate coinage sys- tems, the sole control of monetary affairs being appropriated to the central government. Art. 36 of the Bundesverfassung ran as follows : The exercise of all rights included in the regulation of the coinage belongs to the Union. ^ This principle was later reaffirmed in Art. 38 of the Federal Constitution of May 29, i874.'* Thus all coinage rights were carefully reserved to the state. It was not, however, until more than a year after the adoption of ■ Cherbuliez, La Question monetaire en Suisse, Journal des Economistes, i860 i. I, p. 40. '' See SOETBEEE, Die Goldfrage und deren Einfluss auf das Miinzwesen der handeltreibenden Lander, in ZeitscJirift fit r die gesanite Staatswissenschaft, 1862, p. 79. 3 See for text Bukckhardt-Bischoff, Die Schweizerische Miinzgesetzgebung seii 1S4S, p. 3- 4 For text see Vincent, State and Federal Government in Switzerland, p. 204. 26 SWISS MONETARY HISTORY 2/ the Bundesverfassung of 1848 that the rights secured by Art. 36 were embodied in appropriate legislation. The law of May 7, 1850,' adopted the French monetary system in the following words, ^ precisely similar to those of the law of 1803 : Five grams of silver .g fine constitute the Swiss monetary unit under the name franc.^ It was further specified, by Art. 8 of the law of 1850, that such foreign silver coins as were minted in sufificiently close conformity with the French system might be granted a legal status as regular media for the payment of debts. Accordingly, the use of the silver five-franc, two-franc, one-franc, one-half franc pieces of France, Belgium, Sardinia, Parma, the Cisalpine Republic, and the old Kingdom. of Italy was legalized by the law of June 16, 1852. Under the law of 1850, silver five-franc pieces to the amount of 2^^ millions of francs were soon struck, and foreign coin eked out this scanty circulation. ■• Thus, by 1854, the monetary reform had made some progress. But, by this latter year, and, to a considerable extent, even before that date, the effects of the new gold were beginning to be felt in Switzerland, as well as in France and in Belgium. In order to understand these effects, it will be necessary to devote some attention to an aspect of the law of 1850 that we have not yet discussed. Arts. 2 and 3 of the law of 1850 were as follows: ^ Art. 2. The franc shall be divided into one hundred (100) Rappe (cen- times). Art. 3. The Swiss denominations of coin shall be: a. In silver : The five-franc piece. The two-franc piece. The one-franc piece. The half-franc piece (50 Rappe). ' For text see Handels-Archiv, iSjo, pp. 532 et seq. ' Art. I. 3 For account ot the monetary debate leading to the action described in the text see BURCKHARDT-BISCHOFF, ante cil., p. 4., also SoETBEER, ante cit., p. 80. ■• Haupt, Histoire monetaire de Notre Temps. Paris, 1884, pp. 385 et seq. ^Handeh-Archiv. 1850, p. 533. 28 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION b. In token coinage : The^twenty-Rappe piece. The ten-Rappe piece. The five-Rappe piece. c. In copper : The two-Rappe piece. The Rappe piece. (In gold none.) Thus the Swiss law of 1850 merely carried to its logical out- come the French law of 1803. It based the monetary system exclusively on silver. It made no provision for gold coins upon any terms ; nor were these latter provided for in the law of 1852, which regulated the rate at which foreign coin might be received. But, as French silver coin had been made legal money in Switzerland, it naturally came about that French gold should, in the minds of the people, be placed on the same basis as French silver.' People easily became accustomed to the use of the decimal system and of the franc, both of which had for a long time been familiar to them. When the new gold began energetically to push silver out of circulation in France and to display its greater adaptability to commercial needs it was, in Switzerland as elsewhere, welcomed as a valuable auxiliarv to expanding business. * In vain did the law of 1850 refrain from fixing the value of gold coins in silver. . . In vain did it formally recognize as unit the silver franc In vain did it thus implicitly give to every creditor the right to demand pay- ment in this sort of money [silver]; the force of circumstances, stronger than law, imposed [upon Switzerland] the French monetary system with all its consequences. ° As the Swiss people became accustomed to a more and more extensive use of French gold, and as the French system became more deeply rooted in Switzerland, it grew the more easy to extend to Switzerland the movement which was replacing French silver with new gold. This process first began to be noticeable in 1854-5. Swiss banking houses were actively ' See SoBTBEEE, ante nit., pp. 82, 83 et seq, ^ Cherbuliez, La Question monitaire en Suisse, Journal des hconotnistes, i860, I, p. 41. SWISS MONETARY HISTORY 29 engaging in collecting and exporting Swiss silver coins as well as whatever foreign silver coins were in circulation.' It is only just to add that dealing in gold was becoming almost a necessity in the Swiss banking business, since gold was so extensively used in France that remittances were usually made in that metal, and objections to remittances in silver five-franc pieces were com- mon. During 1855, the disappearance of the new Swiss coin became very apparent, and good silver coins of all sorts and denominations were certainly becoming very scarce — so much so that, in many regions, debts were regularly paid, even at this early date, in gold. In 1854 (December 18), the legislature discussed the situation carefully but could not bring itself to take any step. It, however, declared that it would on no account pursue the policy of admitting gold coin at officially determined values.^ Duringall this early period the public discussion of the gold and silver question was active. Much the same division of opinion existed as in France, and French economists not infrequently joined in the work of assisting the Swiss to select a suitable monetary system. 3 Everywhere the feeling was prevalent that the monetary system should be uniform with that of the neigh- boring countries, but to the agitation for the admission of French gold at a fixed rate was added the cry for a lower fineness of the silver coin. After the official discussions of 1854, the subject was temporarily allowed by the government to rest ; but this did not meet the wishes of the people, who were desirous of seeing the problem settled. In 1856 it was accordingly resumed by the Bu7idesrath, and expressions of opinion were received from the Chambers of Commerce of Zurich and other places, as well as from many mercantile and banking associations — notably those of Berne and Basel." Speiser, the monetary expert ■ See SoETBEBR, ante cit., p. 84. ^ Botschafl des Bundesrathcs vom 14 Juli, 1854, also BuECKHARDT-BiscHOFF, ante cit., p. 7- 3See references given in chap, i ; also Intelligenz-Blatt of Basel, Feb. i-March 5, 1854, for gold side of the argument. ■•See BURCKHARDT-BISCHOFF, ante cit., p. 7. 30 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION formerly active in pushing through the law of 1850, urged, in a document which received the support of the Bank of Zurich (of which Speiser had been a director), the admission of gold. He further argued strongly for a fineness of .8 for silver.' But, although the process of driving out silver was still going on at a rapid rate, the assembly merely announced the opinion that " it is best to hold fast to the coinage system based on silver as heretofore and not at present to enter upon the admission of gold at official rates." ^ This timid utterance did not find much favor. The com- munication of Speiser, just referred to, was enthusiastically endorsed by the Swiss Bankvorsteherschaft (Bank Directors' Asso- ciation), which, led by Ott-Triimpler and other bankers and financiers, began an agitation through pamphlets and the press. Other banks and financial institutions of various sorts were not slow to follow suit. The result was that soon the old basis was almost completely discarded in common trade. All commerce was by tacit agreement based on the so-called " Bankvaluta," and bills of exchange were accordingly drawn in "francs of France;" in other words, they were practically made paj-able in French gold. So far did this usage prevail that at length, although five-franc pieces were slightly more plentiful in 1858, even the government was able to overlook it no longer. In 1859, the Bimdesratli finally brought itself to acknowledge in the following terms the part played by gold in the circulation: "The national and cantonal treasuries can no longer withstand the urgency of circumstances ; the gold standard has become matter of fact, whereas the silver standard remains standing only on paper, and one can without exaggeration assume that nine tenths of all transactions in Switzerland are performed by means of gold, and especially through the agency of the 20-franc pieces." ^ Having once been brought to this point, the Swiss finance •^ Ibid., p. 9. 'See SOETBEER, ante cit,, p. 84, and BuRCKHARDT-BlsCHOFF, ante cit., p. 8. 3SOETBEER, ante cit., p. 85. SWISS MONETARY HISTORY 3 I department found further steps comparatively easy. September 30, 1859, the cantonal governments, banking establishments, and economists received from the department a circular propounding five questions, on the relative merits of the bimetallic, gold, and silver standards.' Of the fifty replies all save three condemned the existing system, and far the larger number urged the uncon- ditional extension of the legal-tender quality to French gold coin.^ The great opportunity offered to the controversialists by the prospect of action on the part of the Bundesrath was not neglected. The controversy between journalists and pamphlet- eers increased in violence. 3 All this was not without its effect on the Federal Council. Its report briefly reviewed the situa- tion created by the invasion of the new gold, and surveyed the monetary problem as existing in the various countries of the world. It was fully recognized that, as at present constituted, the Swiss monetary system was almost dependent upon the French ; and the report entered at great length into the complex- relations resulting from this state of things. "* In general the belief that an expectant attitude could no longer be profitable- sustained was expressed. It was impossible to exclude gold. The report therefore thought best to admit it at a fi.xed rate, thus practically adopting the French double standard, while at the same time a lower fineness for subsidiary coin was recom- mended. A draft of an arrcte to this effect was submitted. These propositions of the federal council were made the subject of a report by a committee of the national assembly of January 14, i860. After a study of the French law of 1803, it pronounced the opinion that the French double standard owed its existence to an unintentional blunder in legislation. In the 'For text see Cherbuliez, "La Question raon^taire en Sms,s.t," Journal des Aconomisles, i860, i. i, p. 42. = In the Botschaft des Bundesratlis voiii j/. Dec, iSjQ. 3 See notably Keller, Gold- und Silberfrage. 1S60; Die Mimzverhaltnisse der Schweiz, von O, T., 1859 ; La Question ntoiulaire en Suisse, CHERBULIEZ, Journal des ^conoffiistes, i860, i. I, p. 40 et seq.; FISCHER, Gold uttd Silber, eine Antwort, a. j. w. ■•See Cherbuliez, ante cit. 32 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION words of the report, the existence of the double standard was an involuntary result of the law of 1803. Such a blunder, it was thought, should not be repeated by the Swiss federal assembly.' "We adopt the gold standard," said the report, "in submission to a necessity which springs from the history of modern civiliza- tion." = Nevertheless, it was believed that such a step as the coinage of gold would be hazardous for so small a country, and adherence to the policy of admitting gold coins struck after the French standard was therefore considered expedient. The decrease in the fineness of silver coin, proposed by the Botschaft, was supported by the report of the committee, and the standard of .8 was advocated ; although it was recognized that such a step would lay Switzerland open to the charge of having, by implication at least, completely abandoned the silver standard. The report of the committee was, in general, well received ; but the bill passed upon it, and soon after submitted by the federal council to the national council, contained, among other modifications, an explicit statement that the Swiss monetary unit should in future be expressed only in its "quintuple value," the five-franc piece. This innovation did not meet with the approval of the Conseil des Etats, and, January 30, the suppression of this new clause was recommended by a committee of the Conseil? In accordance with this view, the Arrets in its final form, and with the objectionable clause eliminated, was introduced on the following day, January 31, i860, and received the legislative approval. It substantially followed the report of the committee of the 14th inst.* Two days later, on February 2, i860, a sup- plementary act authorizing the coinage of i million francs in one-franc pieces and 2 million francs in two-franc pieces, at the new fineness, was passed. = Henceforward Switzerland, even more than previous to the law of i860, was to find in France a monetary arbiter. The first direct step toward the formation of the Latin Union had been taken. ^ Botschaft^ ante cit., pp. \Q et seq. 3 See Cherbuliez, ante cit. ''Ibid, -p. II. 4 For text see z'^ia'. ^J6id. CHAPTER IV. THE COINAGE DIFFICULTIES LEADING TO THE FORMATION OF THE LATIN UNION, 1860-1865. After the French Commission of 1858 had rendered its report, public opinion in France remained for some time in an uncrystallized condition. The monetary controversy, however, lost none of its violence. Nor was the source of inconvenience removed, for the exportation of silver subsidiary coin continued, and the absorptive power of the Orient apparently did not diminish. Consequently a solution of the monetary problem became more and more a pressing necessity. By i860, it began to be seen that energetic action on the subject must not be delayed, and, if possible, should not be confined to France, but should be taken by her in concert with the other countries pos- sessing the same monetary system. Among these, Belgium and Switzerland were naturally most conspicuous. As we have just seen, the need for change in the monetary system had been forced upon the attention of Swiss legislators by the invasion of French gold, and, upon the recommendation of the Swiss corhmission of 1859, the law of January 31, i860, had lowered the fineness of Swiss silver coin, of denominations lower than five francs, to .8. The result of this measure might easily have been foreseen. Recoinage was immediately begun, and, by the end of 1863, no less then 7 million francs in two- franc pieces and 3.5 million francs in one-franc pieces — a total of 10.5 million francs' — had been struck. These being of a reduced fineness and containing 10 per cent, less fine silver than the French and Belgian coins of the same denomination, although exactly resembling them in weight, appearance, etc., were, of course, imported into France and Belgium in no inconsiderable amounts ; and there served to displace the old coins which, when ■ Conference tnonltaire entre la Belgiquc, la France, F Italic, et la Suisse, 1874, Seance du 34 Jan., Annexe B, p. 72, 33 34 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION melted and exported, yielded a satisfactory profit.' During the two years that had elapsed since the report of the commission of 1855, the idea of the single gold standard had been slowly but steadily gaining ground, and public opinion had now nearly discarded silver as the possible basis of a monetary system.^ This evolution, which was taking place in Belgium and Switzer- land as well as in France, led, in the first-mentioned country, to the great debate of the early part of 1861, which, as has been observed in chapter II, resulted in the repudiation of the legisla- tive measures of a decade before and the reestablishment of the nominally double, but really single gold, standard on the same basis as then existing in France. But, having reached the same basis as France, the Belgian chambers dared go no further along the progressive course of action mapped out by the Swiss law of i860. It was deemed best to wait, for it was not at all unreasonable to suppose that France would, in the immediate future, take decisive steps tending to place her monetary system on a more stable basis. As we have noted, continual agitation was maintained by the press, and the export of small silver coin was considered a serious matter. Moreover, demands for a remedy were becoming strenuous. Twice in the session of the first semester of 1861 did the French Shiat devote its attention to the monetary ques- tion on the occasion of two petitions. ^ The first of these docu- ments demanded demonetization of the 50-centime pieces and the substitution of coins of 20, 40, 60, and 80 centimes. 3 But, although the author spoke vaguely "of the total lack of silver coins which renders the payment of unimportant demands difficult," he failed to suggest any remedy or to show how the ""The silver piece of five francs disappeared first, and very soon the fractional coins were, in their turn, attracted outside, and the necessary quantity of fractional silver coin thus diminished to the great detriment of small transactions." — Message of the Federal Council of Svifitzerland of February 2, 1866. See a.\so Journal des £,cono- mistes, 1866, i. 2, p. 284; Laughlin, History of Bimetallism in the United States, pp. 147 et seq.; and CoSTES, Notes et Tableaux pour Servir a I'^tude de la Question mone- taire, pp. 6, 7. 'See the Paris Consiitutionnel, December i, 1859 ; Salut public (of Lyons), Jan- uary 9, 13, and 17, and March 22, i860; Courrier de Lyon, March 13 and 23, i860; aXso, Journal des Jiconomistes i860, i. 2, 2. ^La Crise monitaire. Journal des Aconomistes, 1861, ii, I, pp. 55. THE FORMATION OF THE LATIN UNION 35 substitution of coins of lower denomination for the 50-centime pieces would do away with the evil. Notwithstanding the fact that the petition itself was not to the point, it served to afford an opportunity for the monetary debate which had long been expected. On May 25, 1861, the question was discussed, and M. Dumas made an appeal for the adoption of the policy already pursued by Switzerland — that of recognizing the five- franc piece as the unit and reducing the fineness of all coins of lower denomination.' He urged the chamber to "seize the prob- lem by the forelock and declare that henceforward the five-franc piece shall alone possess the conditions of fineness which the one- franc piece, as well as all the subsidiary coins, has hitherto pos- sessed, and that, with the exception of the five-franc piece, silver coins shall be struck with a real value a little below their face value." No decisive action on this petition was taken, and the next day" a much stronger one was brought in. This, embodied in the form of a request the ideas expressed by M. Dumas on the preceding day, and they accordingly again received his warmest support. Much opposition was manifested b}- Chevalier, the champion of the single silver standard, as well as by others, but to no avail. M. Dumas proposed that the petition be placed in the hands of the Ministry of Finance for action. His view pre- vailed, and it was generally recommended that immediate action be taken,' for the uncertainty in regard to the monetary future was already productive of great inconvenience to the bank,3 as well as to business and other interests. No time was lost by the ministry, and on June 15, less than two weeks after the close of the legislative debate in Belgium, a new commission was ordered by M. de Forcade, minister of finance. Thus it seemed that the "expectant attitude" of Bel- gium was about to be justified by a positive measure. It was not long before the commission brought in its verdict. Its work had been carefully outlined for it as being : '^ Ibid., pp. 6,7. =May 26. 3For account of the difficulties o£ tlie bank, see Journal des &conomistes, 1861, i. I, p. 86 et seq. 36 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION 1. To ascertain the causes which tend to diminish the circulation of frac- tional silver coin. 2. To examine the consequences of this situation and the nature of the inconveniences occasioned thereby. 3. To point out the measures which it would be useful to take in order that the fractional silver coin might satisfy the needs of the circulation and suffice for the payment of salaries and furnish the small change required in business. Thus the field of discussion was not so indefinite as that allowed the preceding commission (that of 1858). On Jul}' 10, 1 86 1, the commission recommended the maintenance of the five- franc piece at the fineness of .900 and the reduction of the new fractional coin to .835 in fineness.' The suggestions of the commission were not immediately acted upon. Either the Corps Ugislatif -wb-S too timid, or the war prospects diverted attention from what were regarded as minor considerations, or it was thought that, on all accounts, a some- what longer delay, in order to see if some change in the eastern trade might not affect the problem, would be preferable to imme- diate action. Thfe work of the commission was not, however, destined to be fruitless. Little more than a month had elapsed, after the rendering of the report, when Italy practically embodied its suggestions in a new monetary system by the law of August 24, 1862.'° It must not be supposed that the work of the com- mission had suggested to Italy the idea of lowering the fineness of her subsidiary coin. The Italian law had, in fact, been pro- posed as early as June 9,3 but the report of the French commis- sion and the prevailing opinion that these suggestions would certainly be acted upon by France and Belgium unquestionably had considerable weight in bringing about the passage of the law. In Italy, as in Belgiuih, the new political independence and need of unification and consolidation made steps toward a uniform monetary system seem prime requisites to constituting a new nation. The various Italian states, prior to the establish- ment of independence, had, like the Swiss cantons, each possessed 'See Rapport de la Commission Chargle d'£,tudier la Question.de I'Atalon mone- taire, Paris, 1869, p. 3; also Prods Verbaux et Rapport de la Commission monetaire Paris, 1869, p. 4. * Compare Report of United States Monetary Commission^ vol. i. p. 252. 3 See Documents relatifs d-la Question Tnonitaire^ Brussels, 1868, pp. 6, 7. THE FORMATION OF THE LATIN UNION 3/ a separate system of coinage and each had apparently prized it highly as a symbol of autonomy. But, with the desire for uni- formity came the necessity either of selecting one of the old systems or of adopting a new one which should be of universal application. Fortunately, Sardinia already possessed the French decimal system. It was no more than natural that the state of Victor Emanuel should give to united Italy its monetary system as well as its sovereign ; while the desire to compliment the French, to whose aid so much had been due, in a way peculiarly grateful to Napoleon, no doubt had full weight. Only in Sar- dinia and Placentia had the French system obtained, prior to the law of August 24, which imposed it upon the whole peninsula.' By Art. I, a coinage system exactly similar to that of France with the lire as unit was provided for. The gold coins and the silver five-franc pieces were to be of the same fineness as the French — .900 — but the silver coins of denominations lower than five francs were to be .835 fine. Silver five-lire (five-franc) pieces were granted full legal-tender power. Also, the coins of the three other countries which later constituted the Latin Union were granted a legal circulation in Italy, and the retire- ment of all non-decimal gold, silver, and bronze was decreed." The importance of this action on the part of Italy was con- siderable. As the fineness of .835 was later adopted by the Latin Union, this early action enabled Italy to get the start with her coinage, and when the cours forc^ Z3.m&, in 1866, she was able, by reason of the mutual reception accorded by the countries of the union to each others' coins, to exchange her coins of lower fineness for what were left of the old French and Belgian silver coins not yet withdrawn. 3 The law of 1862 had no sooner been passed than Italy went vigorously to work at the task of sup- planting the old coins of the different states of the peninsula by 'Compare Haupt, Histoire monetaire d: Notre Temps, y>p. 2b/\ et seq.; CoSTES, Notes et Tableaux pour Servir a. VEtude de la Question monetaire, pp. 50 et seq.; and Report of United States Monetary Commission, vol. i. pp. 242 et seq. ° Owing to the establishment of the corso forzoso this operation was not completed until the end of 1885, by which time 38.1 million of gold, 602.6 million of silver, and 28.3 million of bronze had been retired and recoined after the new system. 3 Compare CosTES, Notes et Tableaux, ante cit., pp. 50, 51. Gold Silver s-francs 1 862 39,097,560 1. 964,435 !• 1863 66,025,300 1864 12,172,600 601,935 1865 68,705,190 4,010,835 38 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION new ones patterned after the French, and by the end of 1865 had coined as follows : ' Subsid. silver 2,098,295 1. .900 fine 32,082,873 .835 " 30,696,351 .835 " 41,937.106 .835 " During the same period, old coins were withdrawn as fol- lows : ' Gold Silver 1862 1,493,7171. 8,215,5351. 1863 4,704,616 61,390,092 1864 7,166,524 54,455,421 1865 11,094,256 116,182,699 Thus, the establishment of the new monetary system of Italy was already well under way at the time of the first meeting of the Latin Convention. In the meantime, nothing was being ofificially done in France. Public opinion continued strongly to favor the gold basis and " the economic world was in accord in recognizing the impossi- bility of the double standard." 3 Beside the two petitions which had directly led to the appointment of the French Commission of 1862, various other attempts to induce governmental action had been made, and a particularly comprehensive petition by M. Leon, in which he set forth the necessity of a formal gold standard, had been presented to the chambers in June, 1862.* As has already been observed, all this was to no purpose. s The process of sorting out the less worn of the subsidiary coins for exportation,* which had already reached an advanced stage in 1862, went vigorously on during the year succeeding the report of the commission. In October 1863, the invasion of the ' Conference monitaire entre la Belgique, la France^ etc.^ Proch-Verbaux, 1874, Annexe C, pp. 74, 75' » Ibid., p. 97. 3 Ou en est la Crise monitaire. Journal des Economistes, 1861, ii. i, p. 18. ■•See Moniteur, June 5, 1862, for report. For text see Journal des Economistes, 1862, ii. I, pp. 133 et seq. s Cf. Rapport de la Commission de 1861, ante cit. ^ Des Monnaies Divisionnaires, va. Journal des Economistes, 1862, ii. \,^\i.i,\tetseq. THE FORMATION OF THE LATIN UNION 39 French circulation by new Italian coin had already proceeded sufficiently far to be regarded as an additional danger.' The hope that some alteration in the course of the trade which was driving silver to the East would come about, seemed to be signally disappointed (as may be seen from the table of imports and exports of gold and silver already given in chapter I.).'' We have, moreover, already reviewed the history of the coinage down to i860, and noted the sharp decline in the coinage of silver during the decade 1850— 1860. In i860, the coinage of five-franc and two-franc pieces sank to zero. This cessation marked probably the greatest extension attained in the use of gold at any time during French history, although it was not until 1863 that the extreme lower limit of the total annual coin- age of silver was reached. It is scarcely necessary to recall why the suspension of the coinage of five-franc and two-franc pieces is noteworthy. These were the only silver coins at all used in transactions of any importance, and when the coinage of five- franc pieces was resumed in 1861, it indicated that silver was again being used (albeit to an extremely slight degree) in busi- ness. On this account, the decrease in subsidiary silver coinage was the more noteworthy, since it was a striking indication of the great lack of subsidiary coin which was now causing so much uneasiness. The coinage for these years may be thus summed up : Gold Silver i860 428,452,425 fr. 8,034,198 fr. 1861 98,216,400 2,518,049 1862 214,241,990 2,519,397 1863 210,230,640 329,610 1864 273,843,765 7,296,609 1865 161,886,835 9,222,394 The flow of silver to the East did not diminish but, on the contrary, largely increased. Whereas the excess of imports of silver into British India was 90.9 million rupees in 1862, it rose in 1863, to 125.5 ^"'^ 'i^ 1864, to 127.9. The price of silver continued obstinately high as compared with gold. "'Le Syst^me mondtaire Yr&nt^&M," Journal des Economistes, ii. 2, pp. 29 et seq. = See also Appendix IV. 40 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Under these circumstances, no improvement in the monetary situation could be expected until either (i ) the ratio should change or (2) some legislative step should be taken. Of the first mode of relief there seemed little to be expected. Consequently, agita- tion for the adoption of the report of the commission of 1862 was renewed and, in response to popular outcry, the Corps Ugislatif overcame its timidity so far as concerned the coins of 50 centimes and 20 centimes.' The law of May 24, 1864, adopted, with regard to these coins, the recommendations of the latest commission, lowering their fineness to .835 and commanding the retirement and recoinage of the old types, while restricting the legal tender quality of the new coins to twenty francs at a payment, and ordering a coinage of but 30 millions. It was desired " that there should be created in each country a fractional silver coinage having a nominal value greater than its real value in such wise as to guarantee it from all exportation and without its nominal value being able to tempt to counterfeiting." ° The object of the law was, however, not attained. Owing to the difference in fineness between the French and Swiss coin (the latter being but .800 fine), it had been profitable to substitute Swiss for French and even for Italian coins. France had been the only country to take a decisive step toward remedying this situation. Even before the passage of her law of May 24, 1864, she had, by the decree of April 14, 1864, shut out the Swiss coins from the customs offices, etc., thus more or less discrediting them in all countries where the franc system prevailed. Circulation was impeded, and the ancient and precious uniformity so long enjoyed by France, Belgium, and Switzerland had vanished. Frontier trade was impeded, and travelers were subjected to inconvenience. The situation was now more complex than ever before. While 'The government proposed to apply the new measures to all silver coins of denominations less than five francs. This v^as narrowed by the committee of the Corps Legidatif to the 50 and 20-centime pieces. ^Rapport de M. Gouin, Diputi au Corps Ligislatif, dlposi le 28 Avril i S64 (Moni- teur^ Avril 29). THE FORMATION OF THE LATIN UNION 4 1 the changed fineness of the coin in Switzerland, Italy, and France in some measure hindered export of subsidiary coin, and the lack of such coin had become extremely vexatious, the new difficulties were affecting Belgium most seriously.^ Whereas Switzerland had a coinage .800 fine, Italy one of .835 fineness, and France some coins of .900 and some of .835 fine, Belgium still retained the old fineness of .900, and admitted the French coins to full circulation. Coins of the other two states might also be found in the Belgian circulation. Belgium, as already shown in an earlier chapter, began to suffer more acutely than any of her neighbors. The new law, as has been said, had not helped France. Less than eight of the 30 millions authorized were emitted in 1864, and less than nine millions in 1865. These small coinages were, as fast as they made their appearance, absorbed by speculator.s who, by various manipulations, were able to effect exchanges, and reap their profit in the old way, although this process was attended with greater difficulty than prior to the passage of the restrictive French law.° It began to be seen that the only wa)- out of existing troubles would be b}- concerted action. The idea of international monetary action was not a new one. It had already been acted upon in the German convention of 1857, and had rapidly become the program of a considerable body of mone- tary theorists. 3 A union between Belgium, Italy, France, and Switzerland, for mutual regulation of the coinage on some basis, was urged very strongly from many quarters. As Belgium had been the greatest sufferer, it was natural that the first overtures should come from her. In the earlier part of 1865, she accordingly made proposals to France. They were gladly entertained, and invitations to a joint monetary con- ference were accepted by Italy and Switzerland. 'See Fauchille " L'Union mon^taire Latine, Son Histoire," in Annales de VEcole Libre des Sciences Politiques, Paris, October lS86, p. 511. ''Compare Serrigny, " Observations critiques sur la Convention monetaire du 23 December 1865," Revue Critique, vol. xxxiv, l86g, pp. 439 et seq. 3 See Revue Contemporaiiie, October 1866. CHAPTER V. THE MONETARY CONVENTION OF 1865. The chain of events which made the organization of some species of monetary league a necessity has now been sufficiently discussed. The semblance of monetary uniformity possessed by the states represented at the monetary convention of 1865 only intensified the annoyances to which their commercial relations were subjected, while the technical excellence of the franc system led the states to desire its continuance. Moreover, a departure from it was admitted to be almost impossible. The new coinage of Italy, the close commercial relations of France and Belgium, as well as the nature of their stocks of coin, and the monetary dependence of Switzerland on France, bound the three smaller countries to France by the tie of a commoij interest. Nor was France willing that the bond should be broken. We need not recapitulate the political and economic interests which led her to desire an extension of her coinage system ; it is enough that they were many and vital.' In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the con- vention of 1865, we shall first consider the question of standard in so far as it occupied the time of the delegates, taking up (i) the history of the bimetallic discussion in the convention, and pointing out every instance in which this subject was touched upon, and (2) the arguments in favor of and against the single gold standard. It will then be possible to consider the technical points in regard to the silver five-franc pieces, the gold coin, and the subsidiary silver, as well as the various minor provisions of the treaty as evolved in the convention. 'The first meeting of the convention of 1865 was held on November 20, and its worlc was completed in five subsequent meetings held respectively on November 27, December 1, December 6, December 21, and December 23. The delegates were eleven in number, two from Belgium four from France, two from Italy, and three from Switzerland. THE MONETARY CONVENTION OF 1 865 43 The speech with which M. de Parieu opened the first meet- ing' hinted obscurely at the question of the standard, but did not propound it as by any means the most important point to be considered. He seemed rather to regard the minor problem of the silver subsidiary coin as the real crux. This was eminentl}- natural. France had seen her silver five-franc pieces disappear from circulation without feeling the slightest regret, and it was only when the difficulties and conflicting legislative measures of the various countries, in regard to the disappearance of subsidi- ary coin, had sharply called her attention to the dangers of the situation, that she had come to regard the state of things as in any sense alarming. It was not strange, therefore, that France did not regard the question of the standard as of primary impor- tance. Her subsequent attitude showed that the preservation of the status quo was what she believed to be most advantageous and expedient. Hence the list of eight questions for discussion read at the close of the president's speech did not include under any of its categories the slightest mention of the bimetallic question, but concerned itself almost wholly with subsidiary coin. The attitude of the foreign delegates was entirely different. In replying to the president's speech, each of the countries repre- sented indicated succinctly its preference for the gold standard, thus coming close to the real question at issue.' It was categor- ically laid down by Belgium, Italy, and Switzerland that the coming treaty must, in order to remedy efficaciously the real difficulties, take some definite action in prescribing a standard.' Owing to the general demand for a formal recognition of the problem, the president therefore added to the list of eight ques- tions a ninth, in which this problem was proposed. It was, however, not until a late stage of the first meeting that oppor- tunity was offered for a consideration of the bimetallic question. The debate was then chiefly sustained by M. Kreglinger who, in a long address, detailed the considerations which had led his ' Conference monetaire Internationale entre la Belgique, la France, V Italic, et la Suisse, Procis-Verbaux, 1863, Seance I, pp. 3 et seq. ^ Ibid., Siance 1, pp. 7 et seq. '^ Ibid., Seance I, pp. 30 et seq. 44 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION government (the Belgian) to prefer a single gold standard.' In closing, he made a formal demand for such a standard.^ The demand thus made by Belgium was warmly supported by the Swiss delegates. Nevertheless it was maintained by France that the question of standard had no place, save incidentally, in the deliberations, and the representatives of the smaller countries were requested to secure more definite instructions on the scope which their governments desired to give to the treaty. M. de Parieu even declared that "the necessity of henceforth adopting a single standard would be an obstacle to the understanding which it would, in the meantime, be so desirable to establish. "3 The next reference to the subject is found in the proceedings of the second meeting, when Italy formally announced, through her representatives, a desire for a single gold standard. No opportunity, however, was given for discussion of the subject at this time, nor was the matter again alluded to until near the close of the third session, when M. de Parieu expressed his regret that the problem of the standard had not received a more thorough treatment.'* This, however, merely called forth from the dele- gates of the three smaller governments the reply that they had already urged the adoption of gold. The final reference made to the standard during the convention was in the course of the discussion on the preamble of the treaty, when Feer-Herzog, a Swiss delegate, expressly pointed out that the treaty was not "intended to give a new sanction to the principle of the double standard." This opinion was confirmed by the president, and the matter was not again touched upon.s Little need be said in regard to the definite arguments on one side or the other of the gold and silver question. They were not stated at great length. Most of the important points urged, were raised in the speech of M. Kreglinger, the Belgian dele- gate, to which reference has already been made. These argu- ments have been discussed in chapter II, but it may be well here to recapitulate them briefly. They were these : 'Ibid., Seance I, pp. 21-30. 'Ibid., Slance I, pp. 30, 31. 3 Ibid., Seance i , p. 30. * Ibid., Stance 1, pp. 72 etseq. 5 Ibid., Seance 4, p. 89. THE MONETARY CONVENTION OF 1 86 5 45 1. That the so-called bimetallic regime did not maintain in concurrent circulation the two metals.' 2. That it exposed the countries which used it, and particu- larly Belgium, to a progressively depreciating standard of value. ^ 3. That it' subjected the various countries to an alternating standard of value which produced financial stringency: 3 a) By draining specie from the bank reserves ; d) by thus forcing the banks to raise their rate of discount. The other delegates who mentioned the subject did not attempt to enter into any extended discussion of the points at issue. M. Feer-Herzog, indeed, expressed a belief that the sin- gle gold standard was best suited to the future needs of a grow- ing commerce, but he did not attempt to support his position by argument. On the other side little was said. To the wish of the smaller countries for gold was opposed the desire of France for a double standard, while no arguments were advanced in support of her position save that the double standard had "rendered her great services " and that it would " lend itself to the possibilities of the future and to the needs of commerce." It is certainly remarkable that the discussion of the most vital problems presented to the delegates should have been passed over in this apparently negligent way. The omission can only be accounted for by supposing either that the smaller countries believed that resistance to French influence would be useless, and so abstained from it, or that they did not consider it strictly within the scope of their powers to take action on a question so important. But, from whatever point of view we regard it, it is abundantly clear that the treaty* was in no sense intended as a bimetallic agreement. In order to see whether in reality it was so or not, we have only to note that the weight and fineness of gold and silver standard coin were so regulated that the mint ratio of gold to silver was 1^/4 to i, and that these metals were neither of them subject to any restrictions as to amount of '/W(/., Seance I, p. 22. 'Ibid., Seance I, pp. 23 et seq. ^Ibid., Seance I, p. 22. < For translation, see Appendix I. 46 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION coinage. Bearing in mind the fact that, at the ratio of 15^ to i, silver commanded in the open market a considerable premium over gold, we are led to the conclusion that : 1. The treaty practically preserved the status quo in France, and, so far as possible, imposed it upon the smaller states. 2. Although the treaty thus practically preserved the gold standard, it nevertheless retained a fictitious double standard. 3. Notwithstanding the fact that the allied countries were nominally left free to choose their own standard, it is clear : «) That the choice of a silver standard was a logical and practical impossibility; ^) that the choice of a nominal single gold stand- ard, in addition to the practical gold standard already secured, would have been wholly invalidated under the regime prescribed by the treaty, in case of a possible change in market ratio of gold to silver. No such standard could have been maintained had each state been required to receive the standard silver coin of all the confederated states at its public treasury. 4. Hence France practically dominated the smaller states to the extent of imposing on them her hybrid system. 5. The treaty was not a bimetallic agreement any more than the law of 1803 was a bimetallic agreement. Thus the treaty of 1865 failed in a vital point. In not defi- nitely prescribing and regulating the relations of gold and silver, it shirked a primary responsibility. It was this omission that was the cause of the difficulties into which the union afterward found itself plunged. The basic error thus committed was supplemented by another, hardly less serious. If the coinage of gold and silver was to continue free at 15^^ to i with mutual reception by the states of each other's coins, one of two things must happen: (i) either there would be practically no coinage of the relatively dearer metal, or (2) if the market ratio should change and the metal at first dearer should become the cheaper and be coined in any great quantity, the international redemption of one or the other of these metals would have to be provided for. It was this omission which led to the difficulties of 1885, in the course of THE MONETARY CONVENTION OF 1865 47 which the union was nearly broken up. The omission was unquestionably a blunder. If international redemption was anticipated, it should have been provided for, since the Latin Union might at any moment cease to exist. If it was not antici- pated the farce of a double standard had no place in the treaty. Since much more of the 'coin of the smaller states of the union would be likely to flow into France than of French coin into their territory (for France regularly had a balance due her) it was not probable that she would lose any of her influence, and the hold thus once gained was not likely to be lost. It is now necessary to look more particularly and carefull}- at the various technical problems concerning the silver coin as well as to touch slightly upon the dispositions regarding gold. As it was, most immediately, the difficulties regarding subsidiary silver which had called the convention into existence, it was not unnatural that that body should devote much attention to obviat- ing these troubles. We shall not here discuss the question whether the silver five-franc piece should retain the fineness of .900 or should be reduced in fineness. Once it was decided that the five-franc piece should be retained as a standard coin, it became, for the time being, less important than any other coin in the whole category, for it could not be coined in large amounts so long as the current market ratio kept it at a higher value than gold with reference to the standard of ISJ^ to i. We come, then, to the problem of the subsidiary coin. There was no question more hotl}- debated. Only minor theoretical problems presented themselves, but, on the other hand, the practi- cal obstacles to an understanding were numerous. Principal among these were the varying standards of fineness alread}- in use. In Belgium, it will be remembered, the old fineness of .900 still existed. In Italy, .835 was the official standard. In Switzerland, .800 had by the law of i860 been set as the proportion of silver to alloy. In France, the law of 1864 had authorized an issue at .835, while the standard of .900 still, for the most part, prevailed. It was, of course, the desire of every country to secure the adoption of its own standard of fineness. The standard of .900 48 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION had definitely been abandoned, and, although it was suggested that it be retained with a lowered weight for the subsidiary coin, the plan met with no favor. The abandonment of the fineness of .goo left Belgium and France free in their choice. New coinages must be had in both countries for, with the exception of the new French coinage of 1864, they must, in any event, comipletely ren- ovate their subsidiary coinage systems, and it made little dif- ference upon what specifications they did so. The new French coinage of 1864 was practically no bar to a change, for only 30 million francs had been authorized' and should such a step be rendered necessary, its retirement would be little hardship for France. The contest was thus practically narrowed to Italy and Switzerland. Both had, as we have seen, new coinages, and neither boasted of very abundant resources. On the first occasion when the subject came up, the deter- mined attitude of the Italian delegates forced the Swiss to give way provisionally. It was not long, however, before the Swiss Federal Council made a formal demand that the fineness of .800 be adopted.'' This at once reopened the discussion. On the side of Switzerland it was urged : 1. That a low fineness avoided the danger of a possible recoinage, necessitated by a change in the market ratio of gold to silver. 2. That the public at large preferred the standard of .800. 3. That the Federal Council "would have great difficulty in accepting the change." ' 4. That an .800 standard lessened the danger from counter- feiting. On the other side it was shown, t 1. That Italy and France had emitted coins .835 fine to many times the amount of those issued by Switzerland. s 2. That for Italy to retire her circulation would be a practical impossibility. ^Bulletin des Lois, 1170-1221 An. 1864, i Semestre, Art. 7 of law. '^ Conference monitaire internationale entre la Belgique, la France Vltalie et la Suisse Proch-Verbaux, 1865, Seance 2, p. 43. ^Ibid., Seance i, p. 16. ^ Ibid., Stance I, p. 14. ^Ibid., Seance i, p. 12. THE MONETARY CONVENTION OF 1 865 49 3. That Belgium, which was free in its choice, preferred the standard of .835. 4. That .835 was a better fineness for the coins, on account of technical conditions of manufacture. - 5. That France had already suffered from counterfeiting and would admit no unnecessary danger in that regard arising from too low a fineness. The force of the arguments was so strongly on the side of .835 as the standard fineness that this figure was, therefore, adopted. Thus Italy secured the most favorable terms she could have expected, since it would not now be necessarj- for her to retire the new coinage which she had just put out, it being, as we have seen, of the fineness of .835. On the other hand, Switzerland's coinage must be replaced by new coin. This, however, was not likely to prove a hardship, since Switzerland had prudently laid by a reserve fund equivalent to the profit on her new subsidiary coinage. This discussion was naturally succeeded by a debate on the subject of international circulation and redemption. To secure a perfect homogeneity in the coinages of the various states was, of course, one of the primary objects of the convention. Yet there were differences of opinion as to how far the work of uni- fication of obligations with regard to the subsidiary coin ought to be carried. Switzerland was more extreme in her demands than any of the others. She formally requested that the fiduci- ary character and equivalence of the subsidiary coin should be expressly stated,' and that an agreement whereby the states should undertake to accept to any amount the coin of other states, tO' cover their own issues by a reserve fund, to retire those coins whose devices had been worn away, and to redeem in gold subsidiary coin when presented in sums of 100 francs or more, should be entered into.° Further, the demand was made that the legal-tender quality of these coins between individuals should not exceed 20 francs, while they should be received with- out limitation in payments to the government. Several other ' Ibid., Seance 2, p. 47. ^ Ibid., Seance 2, pp. 48-52. so HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION minor requests were also preferred. The excessive caution of Switzerland was probably due to her unpleasant past monetary experiences, and the hardships which her traders had suffered from the French exclusion of Swiss coin in 1864. Many of her demands, therefore, did not find favor. Articles 6, 7, and 8*of the treaty show which of her requests were finally granted and incorporated in the draft of the treaty. It was not deemed expedient to establish a reserve fund, nor was it thought possible to interfere with national penal legislation regarding counter- feiting. It was further thought that to make any and all sub- sidiary silver a legal tender would tend to impair the liberty of contracts. The final decision, therefore, was that the coin of each state should be redeemed by foreign treasuries, on demand of holders, in sums not exceeding 100 francs, while the home treasury should receive its own coin in unlimited quantities ; that the legal tender limit should be placed at 50 francs between individuals, and that the countries should each redeem their own coin from the others in sums of not less than 100 francs (payable in gold or silver). This, however, left untouched the question of old Swiss coin, which requires a word of explanation. One object held in view by Switzerland when she formulated the demands already discussed, had been to insure ready recep- tion and free circulation to Swiss subsidiary coin throughout the territory of the new confederation. Since a discrimination against them had been introduced by France in her law of 1864, Switzerland feared that this attitude would be perpetuated under the agreement about to be signed, unless preventive measures were promptly taken, now that a higher fineness than that of Switzerland had been selected. These fears were, however, groundless. If Switzerland became a member of the union no country would hesitate to receive the Swiss coin, pending their withdrawal, since it was impossible that more of the same fine- ness should be issued. It was, nevertheless, quite natural that Switzerland should demand a guarantee, more especially since, as we shall see, a comparatively long period was to elapse before their outlawry. THE MONETARY CONVENTION OF 1865 5 1 Many of the delegates did not see why Switzerland should be so dilatory in the retirement of her old coinage, since she had established a reserve fund with that end in view, and, in truth, there seems to be no good reason for her slowness. After the duration of the treaty had been fixed, it was at length decided that, while all coin, French, Belgian, and Italian, minted under conditions other than those prescribed by the treaty, should be retired before 1869, those of Switzerland were allowed to remain in circulation until January i, 1878, and by a separate article (Art. 7) the faith of the union was pledged for their reception into the public treasuries of the various states, on the same terms with other coin up to the date specified.' As a further guarantee for redemption of subsidiary coin, the obliga- tion to redeem was prolonged two years beyond the date of the expiration of the treaty (Art. 8). The next important question was that of the quota of sub- sidiary coin to be allowed each state. Even with the clause of redemption, it would not be expedient to allow each state to issue the overvalued subsidiary coin at will, to an indefinite amount. The fixation of the limit, therefore, became a pressing and difficult problem. Conditions, both commercial and social, varied widely within the territories included in the compact. All problems relating to token money had, at an early stage of the convention, been ruled out as extraneous and without the scope of the deliberations. But Switzerland was very largely supplied with token money, while, on the other hand, Italy had a less lib- eral supply. In Belgium, token money filled an important place, for it had usurped the place of the 20-centime piece, to some extent, during the difficulties with the silver circulation between 1850 and i860. In France, neither the 20-centime piece nor the token money filled a place of great importance. Switzerland demanded that the 20-centime piece should be excluded from the list of official coins, ^ but Italy threatened that, should the request be granted, she should feel obliged to withdraw from the union. Thus a serious difficulty manifested itself at the very beginning ^ Jhid.y Stance 5» PP* 102 et seq, ^ Ibid,^ Seance i,p. 19. 52 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION of the attempt to apportion the subsidiary coin to each state, for, where token money was abundant, a less resource of sub- sidiary coin was necessary, and, in the more advanced com- mercial countries, V^^^ per capita circulation of these coins needed was likely to be somewhat less than in the others. It was thought that the need for subsidiary coin would vary from 12 to 3 francs per capita. This was the opinion of the banking interests.' In view of the evident difficulties of the problem, it was proposed that no limit whatever should be set, or that the coin should be emitted from one mint, on which the various countries might make requisitions at will according to their needs. ^ But the impracticability of this latter plan was clear, and, on the basis of the estimate already presented, the figure of six or seven francs seemed most expedient. 3 It was thought better thus to have a uniform limit, since the redemption clause of the treaty was pretty sure to maintain an easy flow of coin wherever it was needed. Statistics were adduced by M. Fortamps, showing that France, from 1803 to i860, had had only 2og millions of frac- tional coin, equivalent to a figure of about five francs per capita. He, however, wholly overlooked the fact that the unit, hitherto the franc, was henceforward to be the five-franc piece, and that the estimate of 209 million francs omitted the two and one-franc pieces from consideration. The figure of six francs was never- theless adopted, and it was decided to base it upon the latest returns of the last census, plus the probable increase in popula- tion up to the time when the treaty was to expire. The calcula- tion led to the following result : Country j Total presumable population, Dec. 31, 1879 Coinage quota at 6 francs per capita Belgium 5.237.535 yi million fr. France - 39,820,268 239 •■ Italy 23,368,367 141 " Switzerland 2,697,963 17 " The second paragraph of Art. 9 provided that these figures were to include the amounts issued in those states which had ^ Ibid., Seance \, p. 12. 'Ibid., Seance I, p. 13. ^ Ibid., p. 13 et seq. THE MONETARY CONVENTION OF 1 865 53 recently introduced new coinage laws. This applied to all the four countries except Belgium, which had made no such change. It had been a cardinal point in the first schemes for a monetary union that it should be so managed as to attract to itself other European states. The right of accession was therefore, by unanimous consent, left open to any state which should accept the obligations of the union (Art. 12). In order to insure stability to the new system and to avoid the possibility of a recoinage at too near a date, as well as to afford Switzerland ample time to withdraw her coin, M. de Parieu had urged the necessity of a reasonably long continuation of the treaty. He advocated a duration of ten years, but the first draft of the document extended the time to fifteen years. Probably the real object was to afford a length of time sufficiently great to enable the benefits of the union to become known and secure the adherence of more countries, thus extending French influence. We shall not here enter at length into the technical points regarding the fabrication of the coin. It is enough to say, in general, that the specifications conformed to those of the new Italian coinage, and where they differed, in the first draft of the treaty, they were later changed in conformity with the Italian regulations. The tolerance of weight for all the coins was definitely fixed. This obviated difficulties arising from worn coin. The gold coins adopted require little comment. Gold was maintained at the old fineness of .900 with a complete list of coins. The pieces of seventy-five and forty francs were, indeed, omitted, but they had never played an important role and their places had been usurped by the more convenient denomina- tions. On all the coins the date of issue was to be stamped, and information on monetary matters was to be anually exchanged. These provisions were intended as useful measures for mutual protection. Ital)-, in particular, had not been in the habit of stamping her coin with the date of fabrication, and monetary statistics were, in most of the states, in a chaotic condition. 54 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Practically all of the treaty stipulations have now been enumerated. It is to be noted that the treaty 1. Insured uniformity in the coinages of the contracting states. 2. Obviated the troubles with fractional coin by lowering its fineness. 3. Insured an international circulation. In so far as these were steps toward the ideal of monetary uniformity which was then so much discussed, they no doubt tended to have a beneficial effect. As overcoming the diffi- culties arising from the disappearance of small coin and the conflicting legislative enactments which were its offspring, the treaty was worthy of the highest praise. In these respects, it no doubt afforded increased security to trade and industry in general. Nor can we doubt that it set the example for the international conferences on monetary subjects, and led the way to a more thorough and systematic setting forth of monetary information. Evidently it was the opinion of the various European states that there was danger in the attitude thus adopted, for although, as we shall see, some of them were led to conform more or less closely to the French monetary system, none, with the exception of Greece, were willing to incur the consequences and responsibilities of the quasi-bimetallic policy of the union. In general, our verdict must be that the treaty of 1865 was a compromise. Its success depended on the mainte- nance of the existing, market ratio between gold and silver, i. e., the preservation of the gold standard then practically existing. Thus the treaty placed the coinage systems of the four countries in unstable equilibrium. CHAPTER VI. FRENCH INFLUENCES DOMINANT IN THE FORMATION OF THE LATIN UNION. Our study of the genesis of the Latin Union has shown us that the dominating influences at work in the formation of the league were French. It is true that Belgium had been the country to make the first overtures, but it is also noteworth)- that the immediate difificulties which led Belgium to take this step had been induced by French legislation. As French laws had led to the Belgian advances, so also the French influence had been thrown into the scales to overbalance the desires of the smaller countries for a gold standard, and to impose upon them the French so-called double standard. Ordinarily the organization of the monetary league is regarded as directly attributable to the new gold.' From one side, the justice of this view cannot be contested. It cannot be doubted that it was the new gold that, by its perturbing influence upon the monetary circulation, led the countries which later composed the Latin Union to look about for relief. This movement has, in fact, so far been the exclusive object of our study. As a con- sequence of the influx of the new gold, there came the technical difficulties and friction in trade and industry which have already- been recounted, but it may well be doubted whether these would have brought about the result actually produced, had it not been for other circumstances whose force was felt just at this time. These were (i), the desire for international action on the mone- tary question, and (2), the political aspirations of the French emperor.^ The desires for international monetary action that about this time first made themselves felt are familiar. They varied in ' See Fauchille, " I'Histoire de I'Union mondtaire Latine," in Annates de I'Ecole libre des Sciences Polifiques^ 1886. ' Cf. Laughlin, History of Bimetallism in the United States, p. 149. 55 56 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION their manifestation from the pronounced views of those who demanded absolute regulation of the monetary standard by inter- national agreement to the milder, but almost equally Utopian, wishes of those who merely advocated a uniform international coinage. It does not seem open to doubt that the Latin Union was partly an outgrowth of these popular desires. But, underneath this current of popular will, it seems more than probable that there was an even stronger controlling force. It is likely that the Latin Union was one of the many political schemes of the emperor Napoleon. Like Napoleon I, he wished to become a lawgiver to foreign nations, and regarded it as an aid to French influence abroad that the monetary unit and the monetary stand- ard of France .should be imposed upon outside states as the best that could be devised.^ It was, no doubt, believed that such an extension of French laws would give a commercial and industrial influence which would render possible the attainment of more or less political strength for France in the countries which should join the monetary league. Vague dreams of the extension which might be given to the new monetary system seem to have been indulged, and indiscriminate invitations to join the league were on all sides lavished about. It is by a study of these attempts to enlarge the scope of the Latin Union, and the progress actually made in that direction, that we shall be enabled to see just how far the international monetary cult and the Napoleonic longing for increased influ- ence industrially, commercially, and politically, were successful in giving to the league a scope which in the language of a French delegate at the conference of 1865 "might even embrace the whole of Europe." We shall in later chapters try to see how far the system adopted by the treaty of 1865 really coincided with the desires and needs of the people at large. There can be no doubt that the system had been imposed from above, and that it did not spring spontaneously from the wishes of industrial inter- ests. It has already been shown that the three smaller countries had shown a preference for the gold standard. It is also true ' See testimony of Mr. Bagehot in H. C. Report of 1876, Q. 1426. FRENCH INFLUENCES DOMINANT IN LATIN UNION 57 that the French delegates were as anxious as their associates that the gold basis should be accepted. This is an interesting peculiarity. If no one in the conference desired the continuance of the old system why was not some other adopted ? The answer is furnished by a government report' which, after nar- rating how the wish of the smaller countries for a gold standard had been strongly urged, declares, " The Minister of Finance, M. Fould, was then consulted. The French delegates were person- ally of a mind to agree to the wishes of Belgium, Italy, and Switzerland, but the minister .... de'matided tke maintenance oi the status quo in so far as concerned the silver standard repre- sented by the five-franc piece." But, at this point, it may be queried why — admitting the soundness of the views just advanced — the French emperor should have preferred to a system recommended to him, as we shall presently see, by far the larger part of the monetary experts of the time and to which the nation at large had dis- played its attachment, one which was 1. Out of harmony with the verdict of nearly all of the gov- ernment commissions held both before and after 1865 ; 2. In disaccord with the state of things actually existing in France — only gold being really used for the transactions pos- sessing any importance; 3. Distasteful to business interests in general, since it was feared that under bimetallism there might somehow be a return to the monetary regime obtaining prior to 1848 ; 4. Likely to hinder the extension of the Latin Union, owing to the fact that most nations at this time were tending toward the gold standard. This question is difficult to answer in any satisfactory way. From the very nature of things, it could not be expected that there would be much information available upon the subject. Still, there are some indications which may be made use of in the search for an adequate governing motive. The closeness of the •■ Enquete sur la Question monetaire [Conseil Supirieur de Commerce de F Agricul- ture et de r Industrie), 1872, vol. ii. p. 14. 58 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION relations between the administration and the Bank of France during this period is, of course, matter of common knowledge. The ambitious war projects of the Emperor Napoleon and the eagerness of France to come to blows with Germany rendered it desirable that a strong entente cordiale should obtain between the government and the bank, since through the bank must be floated the heavy loans which would be absolutely necessary in the event of a war, such as was now looked forward to with so much satisfaction. Thus a strong probability unquestionably exists that whatever might be said by the bank found a ready listener in Napoleon. The belief that the influence brought to bear by the bank actually shaped the policy adopted by the Latin Union has heen countenanced by no less an authority than Dr. Soetbeer.' Strong internal evidence that this was the case exists in the government documents and reports of the time, as may be noted when we come to study these sources of informa- tion more elaborately. This evidence is of a character such as would render impossible an extensive exposition of it at this point. It may, however, be briefly summed up in three general statements, which it will be well to bear in mind since they will furnish the clue to some events that would otherwise prove perplexing. 1. The bank was almost always strongly represented on all government commissions of investigation on the monetary question. 2. The policy urged by the bank was generally the recom- mendation of the commission, where the members were govern- ment appointees and could be controlled; and, where it was not possible to wield definite control, the opinions of the bank con- stituted a strong minority report. 3. The bank was always consulted by the finance minister before any important government step was taken, and its recom- mendations were uniformly followed. These may seem mere ordinary coincidences. After a careful • Wdhrungsfrage, p. 29. See also Laughlin, History of Bimetallism in the United States, p. 148. FRENCH INFLUENCES DOMINANT IN LATIN UNION 59 study of the matter it is, however, the present opinion that they afford valuable evidence. Be this as it may, it is, in view of the probability just referred to that the emperor listened com- placently to the requests of the bank, and of the fact that a supposed bimetallism was the policy actually adopted, interesting to note that the bank and the haute finance in general consist- ently and strongly favored the bimetallic policy.' There appears, then, to be some ground for the contentions just advanced. It seems, in short, probable that the creation of the Latin Union was largely a political measure rendered oppor- tune by the monetary dif^culties arising from the new gold, and by the popular desires for international monetary action. Further, the belief seems amply justified that, once the forma- tion of the league had been decided upon, the Bank of France ' Evidence on this point may be had in abundance. A few excerpts relat- ing to the question may prove instructive. According to M. Rouland, governor of the Bank of France: "The real question then reduces itself to ascertaining whether these two kinds of money are still necessary. Those who reply no, err seriously. Gold is not as abundant as it is thought to be when one comes to study the circulation of it in the entire world, and when one reflects on crises past and future. . . To demonetize [silver] exactly at the time when the legal ratio of the law of the year XI exists between gold and silver, that is to say, when they are in perfect equilibrium, to afiirra that gold is almost superabundant when its production is diminishing, to appeal to the future when the present is hardly assured, this is to content oneself with pure hypotheses and to expose oneself to error." — Enquete sur la Question viotietaire^ 1872, p. 68. M. le Baron de Rothschild, regent of the Bank of France : '"As for me, I do not believe [the single standard] practically realizable for FVance. How would it be possible to demonetize a sum of 15 or 16 hundred millions of silver. . . Could one find gold to fill the vacancy? . It would be necessary to discover new mines of gold on purpose." — Ibid., p. no, iii. M. de Warn, regent of the Bank of France : " The doctrine of the bank on this subject [bimetallism] has been perfectly explained by M. Rouland and M. de Roths- child, I agree entirely with what they have said." — Ibid., p. 124. Many similar expressions could be quoted from this document. In the Rapport de la Commission monetaire de 1869, an official communication on the subject of bimetallism was received from the bank, one passage of which ran as follows : " The services rendered by our monetary regime in the past and present, during crises and during ordinary times, cannot be overlooked ; that is why it is important that this regime should continue to exist Evidently France cannot renounce [her pres- ent monetary system] save at a time when the adoption of a universal money by all peoples with whom she entertains relations shall assure to her the facilities which she 60 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION and the haute finance were instrumental in once more dictating the policy to be adopted. Bimetallism afforded the best oppor- tunity for profitable arbitrage operations, and it was only when the bank found itself obliged to pay gold and receive silver that it could bring itself to depart from a bimetallic policy. It is thought that this view will be sustained by the history of the Latin Union from the time of its formation to the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian war. actually derives from her monetary regime. In a word, your committee, considering that the experience o£ sixty-five years has demonstrated the advantages of the mone- tary regime of the year XI and has not revealed inconveniences is of opinion that this regime ought to be maintained." Pp. 199, 200. In testifying before this same commission, M. Rothschild said : " The present state of things, that is to say, the simultaneous employment of the monetary metals is satisfactory and gives occasion to no complaint. . . . It appears to me, then, that there are real advantages in maintaining [silver] in the monetary circulation, and none in suppressing it." Pp. 117, 118. M. Pinard, director of the Comptoir d'E^ompte, said distinctly before this com- mission: "I am a partisan of what is known as the double standard." P. 125. Many other members of the haute finance were interrogated and gave testimony to the same effect. CHAPTER VII. THE SUSPENSION OF SPECIE PAYMENT IN ITALY AND ITS EFFECT ON THE LATIN UNION. From the outset the Latin Union was forced to struggle with unforeseen difiSculties. The treaty had scarcely been ratified, when an apparently insuperable obstacle to its success appeared. On May i, 1866, the ^oz^r^yy^rc/ was established in Italy. For a long time, the deficit in the Italian budget had been developing into a chronic malady, and the perturbed condition of the country rendered industrial enterprise well-nigh impossible. Hence imports soon largely exceeded exports, and trade became demor- alized. From i860 to 1865 the official budgets had been as follows :' Receipts Expenditures Deficits (millions lire) (millions lire) (millions lire) Total 3,150 5,496 2,345 Average 525 916 391 In order to get rid of the deficit, all sorts of measures had been resorted to. From 1861-1865, the taxes had been increased by 45 per cent.,'' immense loans had been contracted, and it had been decided to confiscate at least a part of the property of the religious corporations. Toward the end of 1865, the budget for the coming year had been introduced, and a final deficit of 210 millions was found to exist. This, it was hoped, might be over- come by certain taxes ; but these proved unreliable, and it was found necessary to float a new loan. All this was no new experience for Italy, nor does it seem likely that it would have overwhelmed her financially, had these events not been the climax of a long course of deficit financiering and depressed industrial conditions. In order the more thoroughly to com- prehend the effect of these conditions on the circulation, it will be necessary to examine cursorily the financial condition of Italy ^ Annuario, Statistico lialiano, 1884, pp. 1054-1068. ^ Quarterly Journal of Economics, January, 1889, p. 24. 61 62 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION at the close of 1865. From the first, the new government had relied very largely on loans. These had been as follows : Millions lire i860 (July) - 150 1 861 (July) 500 1863 (March) 700 1865 (May) 425 Adding to these the loans which had been made before the Italian consolidation and which had now been assumed, as fol- lows : Millions lire 1858 (July) 40 1859 (February) 50 1859 (October) 100 we get a grand total of 1965 millions of lire,' the debt with which the Italian government was now struggling. It was only by means of these heavy loans that Italy had been enabled to retain any of her coin, since the balance of trade had for some years been uniformly against her, and would have necessitated heavy exports of specie, had it not been for the fact that the new Italian kingdom had found its credit unexpectedly good abroad, thanks to the kind offices of the French emperor. The exact figures for the flow of the precious metals were as follows:'' Diff. in favor Import Export of import (millions lire) (millions lire) (millions lire) 1862 830.02 577-47 252.56 1863 902.19 633.86 268.33 1864 983-78 573-47 410.41 1865 965-17 558.29 406.89 Annual average 922.91 588.27 334-64 Thus from 1 862-1 865 Italy gained about 1338 millions of lire. This balance was paid by the issue of rente floated chiefly abroad at prices ranging from 80 per cent, to 65.25 per cent. It hardly needs to be said that this condition of affairs could not last long. The sudden popularity which the Italian public stock had enjoyed on foreign markets did not prove very durable in view of the 'For these figures refer to "Analyse de I'Enquete sur le Cours Forcd en Italie, Jour7ial des Econoviistes^ 1874, i. I, p. 223. ^ "^ Annua7'io del Ministerio delle finanze del regno dWtalia^ 1873- SUSPENSION OF SPECIE PAYMENT IN ITALY 63 continued deficit and the prospect of further war. The reaction speedily made itself felt, and the securities were no longer a favorite speculation on foreign markets. The result was that rente was soon lower abroad than in Italy.' It naturally resulted from this condition of affairs that reiite was returned to Italy very freely. This movement seems to have begun as early as 1864. By the opening of 1866, it was in full swing, and the gloomy political prospects^ led foreign holders to rush their blocks of stock upon the market at any price that could be had. The price of the re7ite had shown great dependence upon the political situation, and at the declaration of war with Austria it fell to the lowest point it had yet reached. 3 Whereas the preceding 3-ears had been a period of importation of specie by Italy, the reverse was now the case. Thus the * See Altsures Proposies pour V Abolition dit Cours Force, Expose' des Motifs et projet de Loi, presente a la Seatice de la C/ianibre des Deputes de /j Novcmbre, iSSo, par M. Magliani, Ministre des Finances, de Concert avec M. Miceli, Ministre de V Agriculture et du Commerce, p. 17. This is easily seen by tlie following figures which give the average price of rente at Florence and at Paris : Florence Paris 1865 65.22 65 46 1866 56.54 54.08 1867 53.32 50.02 1868 55.20 51.03 1869 57.11 55.42 1870 57.13 54.23 ' In April it seemed that Prussia and Austria would declare war. Then came a lull, and, .April S, a treaty was signed with Prussia. War was, however, declared by Italy against Austria on the 30th. 3 These movements may be briefly summarized as follows : i860 April 85 % Garibaldian expedition to Sicily. 1862 January 63 Battle of Aspromonte. Agreement with France for removal of capital from Turin to Florence, Removal of capital to Florence. May 73 August 69 October 74-5 1863 March 69 June 73 1864 January 69 May 70s September 68.5 October 64.S 186s January 64 May 67 June 64 1866 February 61 April 53 May I 40 Opening of war with Austria. Cours force. 64 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION political, financial, and industrial conditions were combining to force a great credit crisis upon the nation. The movement of specie is clearly seen by a brief summary of some customs reports. EXPORTS AND IMPORTS OF PRECIOUS METALS BETWEEN FRANCE AND ITALY.' FIRST PERIOD. Ysars Exports from France to Italy Imports into France from Italy Excess of exports from France to Italy Excess of imp'ts into France from Italy i860 ;^2,852,000 4,232,000 4,392,000 8,080,000 5,836,000 6,688,000 ;^2,356,000 2,044,000 2,116,000 3,824,000 5,928,000 5,784,000 £ 496,000 2,188,000 2,276,000 4,256,000 904,000 £ 1861 1862. 1863 1864 92,000 1865 Totals for 6 yrs. ;^32,o8o,ooo ;£'22,052,000 ;£'io,028,ooo SECOND, \PERIOD. 1866 ;^3,o64,ooo 1,140,000 2,740,000 596,000 352,000 232,000 320,000 ^£■9,108,000 7,256,000 2,816,000 4,064,000 3,552,000 4,620,000 4,212,000 ;£6,044,ooo 6,116,000 1867 1868 76,000 3,468,000 3,200,000 4,388,000 3,892,000 i86q 1870 1871 1872 Totals for 7 yrs. ;^8,444,ooo ;£'35,628,ooo ;^27, 184,000 Thus, matters were approaching a climax just at the moment when the treaty constituting the Latin Union was signed. In order to understand the effect of the cours forc^ upon the Latin Union, it will now be necessary to consider carefully the coin and paper possessed by Italy at the time. As has been seen in an earlier chapter, Italy's coinage, 1 862-1 865, had been as fol- lows :' Gold 186,000,650 lire Silver, five-lire pieces 5.577.205 " Subsidiary silver 194,716,332 " Token money 36,190,442 " Total 422,484,629 lire ^ Report of Royal Commission on Depreciation of Silver, 1876, p. 113. ''Journal des Jiconomistes, 1874, i. I, p. 225. SUSPENSION OF SPECIE PAYMENT IN ITALY 65 How much of this coinage still remained in the country is not certain. Probably little of it had been exported. There was also a considerable amount of non-decimal gold, as well as French and other foreign coin. In the testimony before the English committee on the depreciation of silver, the total amount of specie possessed by Italy was estimated as follows : SPECIE STOCK OF ITALY APRIL 30, 1 866 (wHEN SPECIE PAY- MENTS' WERE suspended). Gold, decimal ;£i 6,760,000 Gold, non-decimal to be withdrawn 460,000 i^i 7,220,000 Silver five-franc pieces 3,440,000 Silver convertible in pieces worth from 4s. to 8s. sterling 8,700,000 Silver pieces of two francs, one franc fift}' centimes, and twenty centimes - 4,780,000 16,920,000 Base metal, in pieces valued not above lod. sterling 240,000 Copper or bronze in decimal pieces 1,440,000 Copper or bronze non-decimal pieces 320,000 1,760,000 Total ;£36, 1 40,000 = 903,500,000 francs approximately In addition to the coin, there was also a moderate paper circula- tion. But before we proceed to consider this note issue, it will be well to examine the banking capital with which Ital}- was pro- vided. Italy possessed in 1865 five banks of issue of different financial strength. These were : Capital (millions lire) National Bank in the kingdom 100 Bank of Naples 20 Bank of Sicily 3 National Tuscan Bank 10 Tuscan Bank of Credit Total 135 In addition to the banks of issue, there were also nine other great chartered banks with capitals aggregating 103 millions, the ^Report of Royal Commission on Depreciation of Silver, 1S76, p. 113. 66 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION mortgage banks whose capitals amounted to 15.5 millions, the savings banks with 1 78.9 millions, and the so-called "people's banks" with 2 millions, making in all a grand total of 435 millions.' At the time when the irredeemable legal-tender quality was , given to the notes, only the regular banks of issue were allowed to issue paper, their circulation and reserves being as follows : Circulation, lire Coin, lire National Bank 218,859,179 32,762,196 Bank of Naples 2,780,000 46,459,085 Bank of Sicily 19,103,789 17,189,656 National Tuscan Bank 24,900,000 10,000,000 Tuscan Bank of Credit 5>859,55o 2,000,000 Total- 271,502,518 108,410,937 Thus the total coin and paper circulation of Italy at the time of suspension was about 1174.9 millions. At the same time, the currency on hand in the treasury was thus reported:^ Cash 28 million 1. Notes 68 Bronze coin 15-5 " Total II 1.5 million. Deducting from the 11 74.9 millions already estimated to exist, the 108 million in the bank reserves and the 111.5 held in the treasury, it is seen that probably about 955.4 million represents the total circulation of Italy, if we leave out of account the reserves of banks other than the banks of issue. These cannot be exactly estimated. Probably, however, the combined reserves of these smaller banks did not exceed 250 millions, which would leave about 700 millions as the net circulation. The specie included in this amount, as has been seen by figures previously given, was almost all exported during the next few years. Such being the financial and monetary condition of Italy, it now remains to be noted under what circumstances the notes were made irredeemable. '■Journal des Aconomistes, ante cit., pp. 229, 230. ' Inchiesta sul Corso Forzoso, vol. ii. p. 19. SUSPENSION OF SPECIE PAYMENT IN ITALY 6/ It has already been stated that the features of the time were those of a general commercial and financial crisis. This was due primarily to a contraction of credit, which had been brought about by several different circumstances. The most important of these was, of course, the return of the rente, which has just been .discussed. But there now also entered into the problem the fears of immediate war. These, combined with the various reasons for political anxieties and uneasiness, led to heavy with- drawals of funds from Italy and to the removal of deposits from credit institutions of all classes. This naturally produced a severe stringency which, begin- ning apparently with the National Bank, extended itself to the other credit institutions. Nor was this state of things confined to Italy. During the early months of 1866 the general financial crisis which had raged throughout Europe during 1865 took on a chronic. aspect and showed no signs of diminishing in intensit}-.' In March, the National Bank suspended its discounts almost absolutely. This condition of affairs spread like an epidemic throughout the peninsula, making itself manifest most distres- singly at the commercial centers, such as Milan, Turin, and Genoa. From all sides severe pressure was brought to bear upon the administration, and demands for relief poured in. On the last day of April, the long threatening war clouds had finally burst in a declaration of hostilities. Extraordinary powers were granted the finance minister. The next day (May i, 1866) the notes were made irredeemable. It would be impossible here to enter into an exhaustive study of the economic and financial effects of the cours ford. It will therefore merely be attempted to give a brief sketch of its effects, as has been done of its origin. Like many other conditions of the kind, the Italian cours ford grew, for a long time, steadily worse instead of better. Hardly had the decree establishing it been published, when a heavy premium on gold made its appearance in Italian markets. Nor was the existence of this premium to be wondered at. On October 31, next succeeding the passage of the decree which ■ Analyse de V Enquete sur le Cours Force en Italic, p. 225. HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION established the corso forzoso, the National Bank possessed less specie in proportion to its notes than any other of the prin- cipal banks of Europe. This is easily seen by a comparison of the statistics of the various banks of the time. The increase of irredeemable paper did not stop here. Notwithstanding the adverse report of the committee appointed in 1868 to investi- gate the necessity of the cours forc^, the volume of notes contin- ued to increase steadily, while the gold premium very naturally also displayed a corresponding upward tendency. This increase of the notes in circulation is the fact to which must be traced many of the difficulties experienced by Italy with her coin. The increase was as follows : ITALIAN CIRCULATION OF PAPER. For account of banks, lire State and bank total circulation, lire Apr. 30, 1866, Dec. 31, 1866, " 1867. " 1868. " 1869, " 1870. " 1871, " 1872, " 1873. " 1874. " 1875. " 1876, " 1877. " 1878, " 1879. Sept. 30, 1880. 141,220,000 245,930,000 487,010,000 563,090,000 570,660,000 497,440,000 577,560,000 623,370,000 664,330,000 633,230,000 621,240,000 646,030,000 628,560,000 672,280,000 732,440,000 724,940,000 14I: 495: 737 841 848 942, 1,206; 1.363: 1,454: 1,513: 1,561 1,586, 1,568; 1,612, 1,672, 1,664, 220,000 930,000 010,000 ,090,000 660,000 ,440,000 ,580,000 ,370,000 ,330,000 ,230,000 ,240,000 ,030,000 ,560,000 ,280,000 ,440,000 ,940,000 Under these circumstances it was no more than natural that Italy should witness an immediate and almost total disappear- ance of her coin, due to the deterioration of the paper. By reference to the tables in the earlier part of the present chapter, it will be seen to what an alarming extent Italy's coin was exported, during the years succeeding 1866. During the first few months, some 400 millions of specie left the country — prin- cipally for France.' This, of course, rendered it well-nigh ' Relazione delta Commissione Parlementare d^ Inchiesta ; Deposition de M. Landau, vol. iii. p. 417- Paris London 105.50 26.50 105. go 26.60 109.75 27-55 I 11.20 27.78 112.45 28.82 SUSPENSION OF SPECIE PAYMENT IN ITALY 69 impossible for foreign trade to go on. Whenever payments were to be made abroad, it was necessary to undergo considerable losses in order to get gold with which to liquidate. Exchange was constantly and heavily against Italy as may be seen by a glance at the accompanying quotations: 1866, May 1866, Oct. 1867, May 1867, Oct. 1868, Apr. "Under these conditions," said the Inchiesta of 1868,' which emphatically denied the necessity of instituting the corso forzoso, "the agio created a lucrative commerce which acquired enor- mous proportions. The coin actively drained away by the money changers accumulated in their hands and was sold at the highest prices when imperious needs demanded its use in large proportions." The primary effect of these operations and exportations is not hard to understand. The other states of the Latin Union were flooded with Italian coin. This coin being legal money throughout the Union, and there being, therefore, at first no reluc- tance on the part of the people at large to use it, its export was immensely facilitated, and the departure of the subsidiary coin, which otherwise could not have been exported, was brought about. Soon most of the Italian coin was in circulation in the territory of the allies. It will be well to notice carefully the exact effects which this process was likely to produce upon the Latin Union. These were two in number, and opposite in their character. 1. The effect of the Italian cours forc^ was directly to weaken the Latin Union by causing a redundancy of silver coin in the other countries, as later came to pass, and thereby creating dis- satisfaction with the law under which the countries were living. 2. But there was also an influence operating strongly, although possibly indirectly, in the opposite direction. By losing her coin, ' Analyse de V Enqulte, etc., ante cit., p. 234. 70 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Italy, after the depreciation of silver had set in, rendered her condition a matter of interest to the other powers, since all knew that, should the government fail to override the crisis, no hope of the redemption of the coin could ever be indulged. Thus, two quite opposite tendencies were energetically at work from the side of Italy in shaping not only her future rela- tion to the Latin Union, but even also, to some extent, the views of the other countries within it. These influences did not, indeed, make their weight felt from the very first, but they acted steadily, and, although their operation was slow, yet results could without difficulty be accurately foreseen. CHAPTER VIII. POPULAR DISSATISFACTION AND THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY CONFERENCE OF 1867. The treaty of 1865 did not meet with the universal approval which had been hoped and bespoken for it. From the outset, it was perfectly clear that there were great difficulties with which it must contend, and the course of events in Italy did not tend to weaken this belief. Externally the league presented an imposing appearance, but close observers had no difficulty in detecting fatal weaknesses. To the advocates of Internationa monetary control, however, it presented many spectacular features which served to divert the attention and tickle the fancy of those who had all along been advocating some step of this sort. From the very beginning there were three distinct views con- cerning the Latin Union. The advocates of an international money, who were chiefly bimetallists, expressed their unqualified approval of the principles adopted by the league and spoke of it as a great step in universal monetary progress. They pointed out that never before had there been a period when countries had united together for mutual assistance in regard to coinage, and referred to the treaty of 1865 as marking a new era in the monetary history of the world. From this small beginning, it was said, there would soon follow an extension of monetary uniformity which would finally include the whole of Europe and possibly extend itself even farther. There were many who thought that the solution of the monetary problem had at last been found.' In strong opposition to these reasoners was a class of critics who went as far in condemning the union as the party just men- tioned did in lauding it. According to these writers, the league ^ "The treaty by which the four nations, France, Belgium, Italy, and Switzerland, bound themselves to use exclusively an identical coinage is one of the most char- acteristic treaties of the nineteenth century." — London Economist, 1866, September 15, p. 1077. 7T 72 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION- was a political scheme and a mere product of economic senti- mentalism, which would be little likely to bear any good fruit. These opponents criticised the scheme on the ground of its sup- posed bimetallic character, its loose construction, its disregard of the wishes of the smaller countries as well as of monetary experts in France herself, and its disaccord with monetary ten- dencies of the time. Between these two extremes, the sanest body of opinion was found. Most of those who devoted special consideration to the matter regarded the Latin Union as well conceived and char- acterized by many good points, but as fundamentally vicious in several different respects. As these opinions were important in shaping subsequent history, it may be well to summarize a few of them in a brief way. 1. The treaty was criticised severely for introducing a "third value" for the franc. By the treaty of 1865, the franc was reduced to .835 and the five-franc piece, .900 fine, was made the unit. This confusion over the unit was regarded as essentially troublesome and likely to lead to future annoyance.' 2. It was further argued that the distinction in fineness made between silver five-franc pieces and subsidiary silver could not but be productive of annoyance and the selection of .835 as the fineness of the subsidiary silver was regarded as bizarre and unfortunate.'' 3. There were also less plausible statements concerning the effects of the treaty of 1865. It was feared that lowering the fineness of the coin would raise prices and defraud creditors 3 and that all sorts of salaried workers would find their purchasing power decreased by the new system. 4. Much more reasonably it was urged that the decrease in fineness might tend to drive the five-franc piece from circulation 'Cf. M. Lbon, VUniformitl des Monnaies,f. 3. "As to the opinion of tlie partisans of the double unit I will not stop to argue. If the unit is not one the words have no more sense and we fall into confusion of'speech." = Cf . ibid., p. 4. 3 See especially Serrigny in Journal des Economistes, 1866, ii. i, 399. "La con- vention mon^taire Internationale." INTERNATIONAL MONETARY CONFERENCE OF 1 867 73 and, had the relative values of gold and silver remained unchanged, such might possibly have been the case/ 5. But more emphatically than any of these points of objec- tion, the principle of the double standard as provided for in the treaty of 1865, was denounced. It will be unnecessary to do more than recapitulate briefly the arguments brought forward under this head. In general they were of three kinds : a) Theoretic arguments against the double standard as such. b') The general contention that the international uniformity, so ardently longed for by a certain number of people, would be seriously retarded by the adoption of the double standard. c) The fears that silver might become cheaper than gold and the latter metal be driven from circulation.^ With the first of these categories everyone is" now perfectly familiar. The second classification is scarcely less well known. Even at so comparatively earl)- a date, many persons saw that the monetary systems of the world were energetically, although perhaps almost imperceptibly, tending toward the gold standard, and the fear that France would not be able on that account, if on no other, to induce many countries to follow in her footsteps along the road to monetary uniformity, led them to denounce the adoption of the double standard as inimical to the interests of France's monetary hegemony even if desirable on its own merits. The third ground for objection — the fear that silver might grow cheap and drive out gold — shows how strongly the French had become attached to the new gold currency which they had had since 1848. Although silver showed no ^Il/id., p. 397. ''On these points consult especially Leon's UUniforviite des Monnaies^ pp. 5-16, and Parieu in Journal des Economistes, lS68, i. 2, 38-71, and 1867, i. ^, 321-352; also London Economist^ 1866, September 15, p. 1078. '* The convention is not equally successful in establishing for the future a good standard of value. It falls into the heresy of the double standard. Monetary civilization has been much complicated by the fact that there are two precious metals of v^hich silver, the bulkier and cheaper, is more suitable to primitive times, and gold, the rarer and dearer, to civilized times of nicer habits and with larger transactions. All modem nations have received the two metals bv tradition in their inherited coinage, and they have tried various modes of combining the two." 74 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION perceptible signs of a decline for many months after the adoption of the treaty of 1865, yet nevertheless the change which, during the preceding fifteen years, had come over the French circulation furnished tangible proof of the possibility of a reaction. The remembrance, too, of the inconveniences experienced from the old silver coinage, which had proved so great a drawback to trade and industry, stimulated the fears arising from the new sanction given to what was supposed by many to be the principle of the double standard. The treaty of 1865 had been ratified by both chambers of the Swiss Federal Assembly in February of 1866, by the Belgian chambers in April, by the Italian a short time later.' Not till July 14 did it become a law in France. Even then there seems to have been faint hopes that by some means its character might be changed. The advocates of an international money were disappointed at its apparent lack of popularity, for the treaty did not meet in all the European states with the enthusiastic reception which they had looked for, and they began to perceive that, in order to carry through successfully the favorite scheme of an international money for all the principal states of Europe, they would be obliged to remove from it the recognition of a double standard forced upon them by French officialism. Many schemes had been proposed for an international circulation. Chevalier, in various public prints, advocated a plan for intro- ducing such a money. ^ He outlined the salient features of the proposal and based it on the introduction of the gold standard. The French monetary system, he said, could never be extended to other countries till it rested on a stable basis. Other econo- mists took essentially the same view. Moreover, these plans met with the more cordial reception from the fact that no favor- able response had been received to the broad hint which had been thrown out to England and the United States on the sub- ject of joining the Latin union, or at least adopting a currency in ' 'az^ Journal ties Economistes, l866, i. z, 288. ^See e. g., London Economist, March 30, 1867, p. 355. See also the discussion of the Societe d' Economic Politique during tlie whole of this period as given in \he Journal des Economistes, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY CONFERENCE OF 1 867 75 common with it. The invitations extended to smaller countries met with little favor, and the two larger states just mentioned displayed no desire to move in the matter. The English press, indeed, discussed the question in a desultory way, and the Edinburgh Review even went so far as to lend the project its support. The London Economist likewise was disposed to look with favor upon the desire for an international money, if divorced from the double standard.' It pointed out that the sovereign might be debased so as to be equal in value to an imaginary 25- franc piece, and proposed the same change in the American five- dollar gold piece, while it clearly showed that the difficulties of the operation would by no means be so great as would at first sight appear. At the same time, however, it was pointed out that the double standard could not be tolerated, and it was con- sidered singular that France should desire the retention of a nominal double standard when in reality little but gold was in circulation within her limits. "Gold money," said the Econo- mist, "is becoming the money of commerce. . Intrinsically the large obligations of modern times are best settled in a costly metal. Gold is (and to all appearance will remain) the whole- sale money of mercantile nations." The attitude of the United States and of other countries was similar, and disappointment increased in France. Little action was taken during the half year following the ratification of the treaty, but early in 1867 the agitation assumed a more organized form. On March 3, a petition,'' in which a gold standard for France was earnestly requested, was presented to the senate. Grave perturbations, it was said, had always been and always would be the character- istic of the present system, and the all-engrossing argument concerning international money was forcibly brought forward. The maintenance of the double standard would alwaj-s be a bar to the extension of the French monetary system to other coun- tries, since gold was now the money of all the principal commer- cial nations. Upon the presentation of this petition, M. Chevalier ^London Economist, October 27, 1866, p. 1252. •See London Economist, March 23, 1867, p. 329. 76 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION announced that a commission, of which he himself was a mem- ber, had already been appointed by the administration to consider the question,' but on April 20, at the end of a month, the announcement was made that M. Chevalier had resigned his posi- tion as head of the commission. His reason was that this body had, by a vote of five to three, declared for the maintenance of the double standard.'^ Treasury and bank officials, headed by the veteran bimetallist, Wolowski, had outvoted those members of the commission who favored the gold standard, notwithstand- ing the arguments of Parieu, Chevalier, and de Lavenay, all of whom voted for gold. Of their five opponents, only Wolowski possessed any economic competency .3 The verdict of the com- mission, such as it was, was summarized as follows by M. Magne, the finance minister, at a later date:'* "The majority of this commission thought that the maintenance of the double money of gold and silver established by our legislation, practiced with- out inconvenience for more than sixty years, had the advantage of moderating the fluctuations in the value of the two metals, of modifying financial crises by permitting, according to the demands of circumstances, a passage from one money to the other ; of favoring commerce with the countries which admit only silver, and lastly, of respecting the law of contracts which gives to debtors the power to liquidate in gold or in silver at will, and of not interfering with the habits of certain classes of the population which prefer the silver five-franc piece to the gold five-franc piece." Thus the verdict of the commission was a genuine bimetallic utterance. = The retirement of Chevalier from the commission was pro- ductive of unfavorable comment.* The verdict of the commis- sion was distinctly unsatisfactory and the popular agitation on the monetary question in no wise decreased. It was plain that ^ Ibid. '^London Economist, April 20, 1 867, p. 448. ^Cf. London Economist, April 27, 1867, p. 474. ^ Enquete sur la Question monitaire, 1872, vol. i. p. 3. 5 See for the details Rapport de la Commission monitaire de 1867, Paris, 1867. ^London Economist, April 27. 1867, p. 475. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY CONFERENCE OF 1 867 "]"] some measures must be taken looking toward putting the ques- tion to rest. Fortunately the opening of the international exposi- tion at Paris, where representatives of many nations would be gathered together, had already given the government an oppor- tunity to retrieve itself in a dignified way. "The universal exposition of 1867 naturally threw into relief the clause of the treaty of 1865 which opened to other states the right of admis- sion and lent a new impetus to the search for the means most suitable to extend the circle of those adhering to it."' Accord- ingl)-, the government seized the opportunity to gather together the representatives of as many states as possible for conference upon the monetary question, hoping, undoubtedly, to induce yet other countries to enter the Latin Union. ^ On June 20 the representatives of twenty states came together in convention at Paris. 3 The monetary convention of 1867 was a truly representa- tive body. It included, beside the United States, most of the European countries, both those of the double and of the gold standard. States of the silver standard were also represented. Thus there was every reason to believe that all sides would have a fair showing, and that the verdict rendered would be an accurate index of the monetary tendencies of the world. The convention of 1867 belongs properly to the history of international bimetal- lism. It is, therefore, outside the scope of the present investi- gation, save so far as it affected the action of the Latin Union. '^ Enquefe stir la Question monetaire, 1872, vol. i. p. 2. Rapport de son Excellence M. Magne a PEmptrenr sur les Monnaies. ' Examine for source of this opinion the speech of the president to the conference and the Questionnaire prepared for discussion as given in the reports ; Procis-Verhaux Conference monetaire Internationale^ 1867 pp. II— 15- 3 The states which took part in this meeting included the following : Grand Duchy of Baden Bavaria Denmark Holland Portugal Prussia France Russia Switzerland Turkey WUrtemberg Austria Spain Belgium Italy Norway England United States Greece 78 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION It certainly is most interesting to note that the treaty of 1865 and the debates which grew out of it were in reality the origin of the international bimetallic cult which has since gained so wide an extension. It is, however, merely of importance for the present investigation that we note the bearing of the verdict rendered by the conference of 1867 upon the progress of mone- tary opinion in France and upon the adoption of the system of the treaty of 1865. How did the results of the -conference of 1867 affect the Latin Union? — this is at present of prime importance. From the outset, it was, of course, the earnest wish of France to induce the representatives of the assembled states to declare for the treaty of 1865 and the double standard. It was evidently thought that, now a nucleus of states had been formed with a well-marked policy, it would be much easier for those outside to assimilate their systems to that already thus introduced than for any aggregation of states to unite on a new basis. But this, as will now be seen, was precisely the point where the French government displayed want of foresight. The list of questions which was prepared for the guidance of the debates' made no specific mention of the Latin Union, nor did it clearly request the acceptance of the treaty by the states. This was merely hinted at. It laid before the states the question of methods for intro- ducing international monetary uniformity and the question of standards upon which to base an international monetary system, if such should be deemed desirable. After long discussion of the subject, the influence of France prevailed and it was unani- mously voted to recommend the system introduced by the treaty of 1865. But just here the French monetary influence broke down. The vote in favor of the monetary system, of the Latin Union was expressly conditioned upon the stipulation that nothing was implied with reference to the standard of value." When this important question did come up for decision the vote was given with overwhelming force for the single gold standard. Only 'See Conference monltaire Internationale, 1867, Procis-Verbaux, pp. 13-15. ''Ibid., p. 25. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY CONFERENCE OF 1 867 79 Holland voted on the other side.^ So completely did the feeling of the conference run in the direction of the single gold standard that French officialism was absolutely powerless. France had confidently expected that, now the smaller states of the Latin Union had by the treaty of 1865 consented to put themselves into her hands, they would vote solidly for the double standard. This hope was signally disappointed. Not onl}- did the smaller states prove unmanageable, but even the French representatives themselves voted with the rest.^ Of the more technical discussions of the conference it will be irrelevant to speak here, since they do not strictly concern the Latin Union itself. It onl)' remains to consider cursorily the formal report rendered on the doings of the conference.* On July 6, the vice president, M. de Parieu, submitted this document for the approval of the members. After briefly recapitulating the circumstances under which the meeting origi- nated, he proceeded to sum up carefully the results reached in the debates. "Instead of searching for a new system ' For this vote and the debates see ibid., pp. 33-47. ^ In the Report of the United States Monetary Commission, organized under joint resolution of August 15, 1876, vol. i. p. 64, the following occurs : " It is a mistake, although a very common one, to suppose that the Paris Conference of 1S67 recom- mended the demonetization of silver and the adoption of an exclusive gold standard. What it did recommend was such a unification of the gold coins of the leading com- mercial nations as would render them convenient for international use .... The demonetization of silver formed no part of the polic)' proposed. The only recom- mendation on that point was that nations having the double standard should agree to establish such a legal relation of value between the two metals as would not practically exclude the circulation of gold." In view of the evidence just adduced there can be no doubt whatever that the quotation given above from the report in question is a perversion of facts. It cer- tainly is a complete misstatement. The correctness of the views on the action of the conference in question ^^'hich have just been put forward is not to be disputed. That the finance minister held the same opinion is seen from the following passage of the Enquete sur la Question moni:tair€. 1S72, p. 3 : " They (the members of the conference of 1867) were of opinion that there should be adopted as international money: Gold as sole basis of the system. . . . The conference likewise advised that each state should be allowed to retain the silver standard temporarily." After a period of transi- tion the states were to bring in the gold standard. 3 For text see Conference monitaire Internationale, 1867, pp. 1 05-1 13. 80 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION which must be created in all its parts, you have preferred to turn your eyes toward the system of the monetary treaty signed at Paris, December 23, 1865. . . . But you have not been willing to regard this system as perfect and immutable When the treaty of December 23, 1865, was concluded, three of the states associated in this transaction wished that the gold standard should be the exclusive support of the system of the union. . . With the most remarkable unanimity . . . your conference has been of opinion that it should seek in the gold standard, with silver, if needed, as its temporary companion, the basis of the attempts at the monetary uniformity of the future. The conference has thus pronounced itself in principle for the unity of the gold standard."' M. Parieu then proceeded to a resume of the plan for placing on a footing of equality the princi- pal gold coins of the world: He closed by predicting for gold complete ascendency as the money of the future. Thus the monetary conference of 1867 had rendered its ver- dict with no uncertain voice. It cannot be doubted that its report was fully in accordance with the general monetary ideas of the French people. Just what was its effect, from one point of view, in extending, and from another, retarding, the growth of the Latin Union, we shall now try to see. In order to do this it will be necessary to anticipate in some degree the course of events in France. As, however, this portion of the subject is so closely connected with the international conference of 1867, it will serve our purpose better to study these events just at this point. The conference of 1867 helped to extend the technical system of account used by the Latin Union, by the fact that it had voted in favor of this coinage system as such. At the same time, it hindered the accession of states to the union, by the fact of its having declared for the gold standard. It is an interest- ing fact that while there had been some prospect of accession to the union before the conference of 1867, all of those states which had not already progressed beyond the point where they were committed to joining France and her allies, either withdrew ^ Conference monitaire Internationale^ 1 867, pp. 1 1 1, 112. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY CONFERENCE OF 1 867 8 1 their overtures immediately after the conference, or so altered them as merely to apply to the extension of the technical coin- age system of France to their own territory. Only one state had really agreed to join the union prior to the Paris conference. This was Greece, which by a law of April lo, 1867, had declared its intention of taking advantage of that clause of the treaty of 1865 which guaranteed admission for such foreign states as should accept the obligations of the act. At the same time with the Greek negotiations, some desultory proposals had been made for the admission of Spain and Roumania into the union. As, however, these bore no immediate fruit, they will not here be considered. It is hard to see why the admission of Greece to the Latin Union should have been desired or allowed by that body. In no sense was she a desirable member of the league. Economically unsound, convulsed b)- political struggles, and financially rotten, her condition was pitiable. Struggling with a burden of debt, Greece was also endeavoring to maintain in cir- culation a large amount of inconvertible paper. She was not territorially a desirable adjunct to the Latin Union, and her com- mercial and financial importance was small. Nevertheless her nominal admission was secured, and we may credit the obscure political influences, to which reference has been made in a pre- ceding chapter, with being able to effect what economic and financial considerations could not. Certainly it would be hard to understand on what other grounds her membership was attained.' The unit adopted was to be the silver drachma, .goo fine, corre- sponding exactly to the franc, with multiples analogous to those of the French system.'' When we come to study the coinage history of the Latin Union we shall see that little use of the new system was ever made by Greece. The coinage has been insig- nificant. Thus Greece was a mere useless appendage to the monetary league. Her admission is another fact tending to con- firm the political inferences already drawn. ^ Cf. O. Haupt, Histoire monitaire de noire Temps, p. 219. '^ See H . COSTES, Notes et Tableaux pour Servir a V Etude de la Question mone- iaire. Paris, 1SS4, p. 54. 82 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION 4 A much more desirable accession would have been found in the case of Austria. Unfortunately for the Latin Union, how- ever, progressive monetary tendencies, aided by the verdict of the Paris conference, here won a decisive victory over conserva- tism. The relation of Austria to the Latin Union has never been considered, but it nevertheless furnishes a valuable indication of the progress of the new monetary ideas. As early as April 1867 a specially appointed commission had been working upon the monetary problem in Austria.' Under the leadership of Baron Hock some careful work had been done in considering what means for improving the confused monetary system of Austria would be most practicable and — what is more to the present pur- pose — how this system could best be assimilated to that of the Latin Union. On April 16 the following resolution was carried: Austria ought to associate herself actively in the efforts of the French government after ^ universal monetary union and the creation of a universal money, and she ought, to this end, to declare herself ready to make part of a universal monetary union.' This in itself was not sufficiently definite to arouse much sat- isfaction in France, and a much more decisive utterance was to come. On the same day it was voted "that Austria would pre- fer the exclusive gold standard." " That it would be well to join in the monetary treaty concluded December 23, 1865," but with the modification that "Austria shall not be brought to the double standard .... and the countries under the regime of the said convention shall be invited to renounce the double standard." It was soon after this that the Paris convention of 1867 took place. Austria was represented, and the report of the convention, as already considered, as well as the 'recommenda- tions of the "commission," relating to the assimilation of the Austrian to the French monetary system, went far toward strengthening her already decided preference for the gold standard. Accordingly, on December 24, 1867, a monetary 'See Verhandlungen . der Speaial-Commission zur Beachthung der Miinzfrage. Wien, 1867. °For a brief r^sum^ of the work of the " Spezial-Commission" see Journal des Economistes, 1867, i. 2, pp. 353-35^* INTERNATIONAL MONETARY CONFERENCE OF 1 86/ 83 treaty was signed between France and Austria. It was a severe defeat for the bimetallic policy. By this document it was stipu- lated that the two countries should mutually receive into their public treasuries one another's gold coins at specified rates, and it was especially provided, by Art. 8, that the High Contracting Parties engage themselves not to modify the fineness, weight, or legal-tender quality of the gold coins specified in the preceding articles, coins which shall be regarded as constituting their invariable and common monetary standard. By the second clause of the article the power to suppress the silver coin was reserved. Thus, so far as relations with Austria were concerned, France — and later the whole Latin Union — was theoretically as well as practically on a gold basis. The treaty with Austria was the last real extension gained by the Latin Union. There were, however, certain other countries which made partial efforts to secure, with the allied countries, a free international circulation of coin. These it will be worth while to mention. The negotiations with Spain and Roumania have already been referred to. It will be unnecessary to enter at length into this obscure portion of the histor)' of the Latin Union. Just why negotiations were broken off does not seem to be known. Neither of the countries would have made desirable members of the Latin Union. This, however, would probably not have had decisive weight, and the real reason is, it seems likel}', to be sought in the political history of the times. Although debarred from active membership in the union, Roumania never- theless, by a law of April 14, 1867, decreed her adoption of the monetary regime of the Latin Union' after January i, 1868."^ Unlike Greece, the government went systematically to work and succeeded in making some progress^ in introducing the system. The unit adopted was the ley, precisely equivalent to the franc and, like it, having 100 subdivisions. Like Greece, Spain also made, in 1868, an abortive attempt to introduce the system of the Latin Union. In that j-ear the law of October 19 sought to • H. CoSTES, Notes et Tableaux ante cil., p. loi. "O. Haupt, Histoire inonilaire de notre Temps, p. 357. ^ Ibid., p. 358. 84 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION establish the franc system in Spain, substituting the franc or peseta for the real and escudo.^ Spain's economic and financial condition, however, was such as effectually to preclude any genuine progress, and it was not until after 1870 that much was done. Thus, no considerable extension was attained by the Latin Union. '^ If it be asked why the hopes of the advocates of international money had thus been disappointed, it can only be said that beyond question the bimetallic policy had frustrated these desires. With the considerable favor accorded to the plan for uniformity of money, it certainly seems more than probable that it might have been carried through had it rested upon a different basis. But France and her allies had given in their support to a supposed bimetallic policy, and, without them, the project of international monetary uniformity was little likely to be a success. Moreover, its most energetic supporters were to be found in France. As the other European states were unwil- ling to join her upon a bimetallic basis, international monetary uniformity became impossible. '■ Ibid.^ p. 162, also Costes, ante cit,, p. 91. = This is not to say tliat no other states adopted the system. Tlie colonies of France, notably Algeria and Tunis, came under the scope of the treaty of 1865. Peru had already adopted the franc system by the law of Jvily 31, 1863, and the United States of Columbia and the United States of Venezuela followed suit in 1871 (June 9 and May 11, respectively). August 9, 1877, the Grand Duchy of Finland; November 11, 1878, Servia ; May 17, 1880, Bulgaria ; pursued the same policy. With Spain had also been included her colonies. Thus, at the end of the movement, about eighteen states had adopted the franc system. CHAPTER IX. COINAGE AND THE RATIO. 1865-1870. Before proceeding further with our study of the internal history of the Latin Union, it will now be necessary to examine some of the exterior facts of its history during the period immediately succeeding its formation, and prior to the limita- tion of the coinage in 1873. A careful study of the facts relating to coinage, exports and imports of gold and silver, and the events having an immediate bearing upon the move- ment of specie during this early period of the history of the league, when the monetary condition of the allied countries was unperturbed by any very marked alteration in the rela- tive value of the precious metals, throws light upon the subsequent history of the treaty of 1865, and will enable us to- understand more accurately the real value of the monetary league as such. The close of the year 1865 was an unpropitious time for the establishment of a monetary union, based upon the principles adopted by the treaty of that year. Coming as it did just after the completion of the great movement of gold into France, and pursuing the policy that it did, there was really not a chance for its success. By making the- smaller states dependent upon France, the Latin Union hindered them, as we shall later see, from actively caring for their own interests when the fall in the value of silver began to grow more marked, and forced upon them subsequently the necessity of redeeming a mass of depre- ciated metal. It goes without saying, that, as the door had been left open for the entrance of both metals into the circulation, the fact of prime importance to the associated countries was the ratio of gold to silver in the open market. At the time of the formation of the Latin Union, the period when silver had a high .value was nearing its close. The demand for silver for export to the East 85 86 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION CHART I. CHART SHOWING RATIO OF SILVER TO COLD BY MONTHS. 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 l:-2i k. ^ -^^ ■^ -^ -il-o o % C *: k ^ i; 4 1 c ;s c 1 k % t 4 'I 1 ■^ Q % -1 k =% 5! ^ ^ ^ 4! c k 4 -c •io*i ^ILVtR BELCIAH COLD » StLVEK - JTALIAU COLb become of sufficient importance to attract much attention. Even then it was not so marked as to arouse any alarm or to create an adequate impression of the importance of the movement whose beginning it was. Only in 1867, did it really appear that silver had at last reached a slightly lower level, upon which it seemed likely to remain. The accompanying chart (Chart I) is intended to illustrate this history. The slight rise in value, noticeable toward the close of 1869 s-'^d continuing during the first months of 1870, was not to be a permanent feature of the market price of silver. Thus it may, in general, be said with sufficient accuracy that 88 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION CHART III. CHART SHOWING COINAGE OF ijS s SILVER &f RANC PIECES IN LATIN UNION. ; S * /BW ie i7 (a tf lo n n ?j 74 7S 7i 77 7b 79 im / » 1 1 1 ' --- 1 / ao 1780 / 2iO /Tin ^ , , ' 2V mo < 1 1 3U ^ ! :^ ^J \ 1 1 "^ 5 " 1. J^ 200 noo m im 1 ~ ; _ -a^- _;_ * - ~ i . 3o ■^ s ^ J «, ^ 1 »^ 1660- i "T _ — I 2 : : ^ ^ > . >■ l~ — 1: K ? ,|L ''"^ X / s , "^ . 100 ■' ^ . M fijifl- / :i 5 ' to im- ^ - 'l ^--J 1 ^ ~ ■n ^ ' / -2 " \ > V /S40 / 1 '■ \ ; ^^ / * s ■■ ^ ^ the period 1 865-1 871 was, on the whole, a period of a lowered value of silver. The significance of this fact for the countries of the Latin Union was very great. With free coinage of both precious metals there could, naturally, be but one result.' Gresham's law began to operate, although now the gold coin, instead of the silver, formed the subject of speculative opera- tions. This reflex movement, of course, was first displayed in an increased coinage of silver after 1866. This tendency 'The discussion of the ratios of gold to silver contained in this chapter is based on the tables given in Appendix II, F, p. 225, of Laughlin's History of Bimetallism in the United States, where the ratios are computed from the gold price per ounce of silver as quoted by Pixley & Abells. COINAGE AND THE RATIO 89 CHART IV. FRANCE IMPORTS. EXPORTS. J > \ ^ ' 1 1 1 i § » ^ I 8 1 S 3 i :> a s 3 § 1 1 i 1 i s s r ^ ' ^ ~ _ 1^ ^ ! y '~ ^ _ \ - ' -^ -^ /-^ ■~, 1/ X ' ' 1 - y ^ _^ ;2E T7 rte -:\,, / ' 1 1 ^ \ r _^^^ '- ,^ - — " 1 ■^ \i ; j 1 us 1 \ .^ 1 ' -^ - - \, 1 1 J> 1 ^- 1 ■-^ ; 1 ^^r^^ '' s r "* 1 1 ' 1 *" ■ij,/. |_ . ' ' / ■- — Ci ^ — ^ ■C ^ ^ -■ -. * \ ^ \ - / ^ / 1 -^ ~~ ^s \ vi ^ 1 ! ; ■^ N — -^! ^ 1 > — / ^ . T -^ ', ' 1 1 , 1 Jl. y ' i 1 i 1 *■ < — -- '--^: 1 4^ ! / 1 1 r L ■ ' ~~^ ^.- ..^ 1 i V MILLIONS OF FBAftC- toward increased coinage is illustrated in the accompanying' chart (Chart II), which shows the general movement of gold and silver toward the mints of the three principal countries of the Latin Union. It appears that a notable increase in the coinage of silver was already to be seen. By comparing Charts I and II it will be observed that fluctuations in the amount of silver presented for coinage followed closely upon similar changes in the ratio. A juxtaposition of the line representing the amount of silver minted with that showing the variations in the ratio will demonstrate the close connection between what appear to be slight fluctuations in the relative value of the 90 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION CHART V. CHART SHOWING METALLIC STOCK BANK OF FRANCE. i 5 > s i s 1 1 3 1 : a \ \ > i J \ s i /\, \ 1 / / \ r"-^ \| ' ^ -7 , \\ / I \ y 1 ~*-^ -^, 1 A. ■| ^ ^ / X ; A i / " ! / \ \ ~^ ^ \ \ ^s \, ~~~~^ ^^-^ / ^s ■^ ,,' "~- ^ _«^ «::35S =J--^ \. .'' '~^~ L^ ^ ^ ^\ \ / ~" --____ , "^^"^ „_^^ -~ -. "--^ ■~^ 3— 1 \ MILLIONS' OF FflANCS precious metals and the amount of silver presented for coinage. Such a juxtaposition has been effected in Chart III, where the coinage of five-franc pieces, the representatives of the legal- tender quality of silver, has been dissociated from that of other denominations of silver coin, and the ratio is expressed in yearly averages. There can be no doubt that the verdicts of the government commissions which, from time to time, gave their opinion in favor of a gold standard had also an effect in increasing the coinage of silver, by leading those desirous of taking advantage of the cheapness of silver to hurry forward coinages of that metal, before the passage of hostile legislation, which seemed at times to be imminent. COINAGE AND THE RATIO 9 1 As might naturally be expected, the imports and exports of gold and silver showed a general correspondence with the movement of coinage and the ratio in open market. As Paris was in reality the principal money market for the smaller countries as well as for France, the French imports and exports of gold and silver may roughly be regarded as typical of the whole Latin Union. Chart IV illustrates the movement of gold and silver into and out of France. As has already been indi- cated, the large movement of specie into France was due prin cipally to the Italian cours forcd and the return of the Italian re7ite, which led to the export of specie from Italy to those markets where rente had been chiefly held, notably Paris. It is, of course, to be noted that the imports of silver are considerably heavier as the price of silver grows lower, while the exports of silver, which before this had been draining that metal to the East, fall off. One more important point yet remains to be considered before we finish our study of the external facts of this period in the history of the Latin Union. Light is thrown on the general situation b}- the figures for the holdings of different sorts of specie by the Bank of France. A study of these sta- tistics yields information not only on the actual constitution of the bank's reserve, but also: 1. On the comparative use of the two metals as money by the people, and hence of the comparative popularity of each. 2. On the amount of coin of the allied states which flowed into France, and secondarily of the effect of the Latin Union in promoting this flow. Chart V presents the figures representing these holdings by the Bank of France. The amount of foreign coin held has also been dissociated from the holdings of native gold and silver coin and is plotted as a separate line. Examining the reserve for the period 1 866-1 S70 it is to be noted that, in 1869, the silver held in the bank's vaults rises to a considerable height, even exceeding in amount the gold reserve. A comparison of Chart V with preceding charts shows that this movement followed 92 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION quite closely upon the increased coinages of silver. Owing to the dislike universally felt for the use of silver in common transactions, it is probable that much of the new silver coin was exchanged at the bank for gold. This is rendered the more probable by the decrease to be noted in the amount of gold held by the bank. If it be objected that the general level of the gold held by the bank is higher during this period than during the one preceding, it may be replied that this was, to a great extent, due to the somewhat enlarged use of paper and to the general favorable balance of trade. The same argument can- not be used to explain the increase of silver in the bank, because of the fact that the amounts of silver held by that institution correspond so closely to the amounts coined, while possible increase, owing to importation of foreign coin is excluded, since this latter category of assets is plotted separately. The third line which, as just observed, shows the quantity of foreign coin held by the bank, rises steadily during the period immediately succeeding the Italian suspension and the heavy exportation of specie from Italy. This, at first sight, sets up the assumption that the foreign coin held by the bank at this period was largely Italian, and this in fact was the case, as is substantiated by numerous contemporary statements. It is, however, we'll to call attention to a fact not shown by the chart — that, of the foreign coin which flowed so plentifully into France, the major portion deposited in the bank was silver. The Italian gold coins being in every respect of equal value with the French coins of like denominations, circulated freely. In regard to the whole con- dition of the circulation in France during the period under con- sideration evidence was, at a later date, given by M. Rouland, governor of the Bank of France, as follows: "It is quite clear that silver, progressively less demanded since the end of 1866, having no longer the power to command a high premium out- side, has more and more flowed to the mint for coinage, when in ingots. On the other hand, in view of the circumstance that gold remains abundant and is better worthy of circulation, owing to the fact that it is more convenient and is preferred COINAGE AND THE RATIO 93 coined silver has, little by little, retired into the reserves of the bank, where it today appears in considerable quantities."' It may be remarked that the same statement would have applied to the circulation of Belgium. Thus the period subsequent to 1866, immediately after the formation of the Latin Union, may, in general, be regarded as displaying premonitory symptoms of the silver crisis that was soon to follow. The influence of the new turn in monetary events upon public opinion has already been slightly touched upon and will later be developed at greater length. It is, there- fore, only necessary to note at this point that the new prospects regarding the future value of the precious metals seem to have had very considerable effect in strengthening the preference for a single standard which had already been shown. In view of the facts just set forth, it will not be difficult to understand the general uneasiness and desire to attain a stable basis for the monetary system of the allied countries. It will now be neces- sary to study, in their relation to more immediate important events, the data just considered. 'See Enquete sur la Question monitaire, 1872, p. 86. CHAPTER X. THE MONETARY QUESTION IN FRANCE. 1867-1870. So far, our study has concerned itself with the perturbations experienced by the monetary systems of the various countries after the appearance of the new gold, and with the general movement for international monetary action as a remedy. Of this movement, which, for the time being, culminated in the International Conference of 1867, the treaty of 1865 was an incident. It is not until after the International Conference of 1867 that the history of the Latin Union really begins. The renewed flow of silver toward the mints of the allied countries, taken in conjunction with the verdict of the conference of 1867, began very naturally to strengthen the desire, by the adoption of the gold standard, to rehabilitate the prospect of an international monetary union on a large scale. It is with the discussions over the proposals for a change in the standard that the history of the first period of the Latin Union is taken up. In a former chapter, brief allusion was made to the abortive attempt at a monetary investigation, known as the Commission of 1867.' In order fully to understand subsequent occurrences, it will now be necessary to revert to the report rendered at that time, since it constituted the beginning of the series of govern- ment investigations which continued throughout the three years from 1867 to 1870. As has already been said, the verdict of this commission, consisting, as it did, chiefly of treasury and bank officials, was for bimetallism, the vote standing five to three. The minority, however, filed a report which succeeded in exerting a considerably greater influence upon public opinion than did that of their opponents. The points of difference may be summed up under three heads : ' See Commission monitaire. Documents relatifs a la Question monetaire, Ministhre des Finances, 1868, pp. 3, 4. 94 THE MONETARY QUESTION IN FRANCE 95 1. The interpretation of the law of 1803. 2. The comparative advantages of the double and single standards. 3. The difficulties and advantages of the ultimate retirement of silver. On the first of these three points, extensive citations from the various speeches delivered in the assembly at the time of the passage of the law of 1803 were made. The partisans of the single standard were anxious to show that the law of 1S03 had really intended to establish the silver standard in France. It was shown that in all the debates upon the monetary question, from 1789 to 1S03, the sole desire had been to set up a single invariable silver standard.' But, notwithstanding the conclusi\'e evidence adduced upon this side of the controversy, a distinctly opposite view was maintained by the majority of the commission. By references to various authorities it was attempted to substan- tiate the claim that the bimetallic principle had been set up in the law of 1803, and the utterances of Gaudin were ingeniously explained away.'-= Secondly, it was urged by the monometallists that while a single metal might be subject to occasional fluctuations in value these would not be so frequent as where two were used "simul- taneously." The theory of bimetallic "compensation" and the simile drawn from the compensatory pendulum were shown to be inexact, and it was pr.jved that little danger from the depre- ciation of gold was now to be anticipated while, on the other hand, the depreciation of silver just setting in would be likely to drive out gold. Thus [said the report] ^ the alternating standard set up by the law of 1803 is a vicious principle ; it introduces into contracts an element which escapes the attention of the parties to a bargain, and of which the mass of contract- ants take no account ; it would allow the debtor, if the premium should * One quotation from Gaudin may be repeated : " Neither abundance nor scarcity shall make a change in the value of the franc. It shall be then as invariable as the weight of five grammes of silver nine-tenths fine ; it shall be this identical weight, and whoever shall have lent 200 francs may only be reimbursed with one kilogramme of silver, which shall be worth always 200 francs." — Ibid., p. 55. = /i^; Ibid., pp. 310-320. ^Qi, Journal des f^conomisles, Revue des Deux Alotults, Revue Conteviporaine, VOffi- '■iel, etc., for the whole of this period. I06 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION a report to the emperor, dated November 8, 1869,' he advocated the appointment of a new commission. " There is no question," said he, " on which it would be more necessary to exclude all haste and to consult public sentiment before acting." He pro- posed that the monetary problem be investigated by the Conseil Sup^rieur de V Agriculture du Commerce et de I' Industrie. The report was approved, and, despite the threatening political out- look, the Conseil\i&g2j\ its work on December g, 1869, continuing the discussion until the month of August of the following year. The work of the Conseil Superieur was more thorough than that of any other French monetary commissson before or since. Many competent financiers and economists were examined and their testimony carefully considered. A very accurate investi- gation of the principal problems involved was attempted, how- ever. The results of this work had unfortunately no opportunity of influencing public opinion. No report was rendered to the government until late in 1870, and the disturbed state of public affairs then made monetary action impossible. Even the publi- cation of. the report was delayed until 1872, '^ owing to the destruction by fire of the first collection of materials for it. The evidence obtained by the commission has been already made use of at various points in this study. It is, therefore, only neces- sary to notice briefly the general tone of the report made to the government. The monetary systems advocated by the experts examined were of three sorts: (i) The system of the double standard; (2) the single gold standard .900 fine, with the gold five-franc piece and its multiples as basis; (3) the single gold standard with the gram of gold and its decimal multiples as basis. The first system was supported by eleven of those who made depositions. Among these were M. Rouland, gov- ernor of the Bank of France, and MM. de Rothschild and Wolowski. The gold standard, under the usual conditions, was advocated by twenty-three of those examined, while three 'See Rapport de M. Magne sur V Institution d'une Enqulte sur le Rigime monhaire Paris, 1869. ^ Enquete sur la Question monetaire; Conseil Superieur de V Agric'ultur590 Total 7,707,625,860 — Ibid., 1875, PP- 4Si 46. ''Ibid., 1875, Siance du 28 Janvier iSyj, Annexe D; and Siance du j Fevrier iSts, Annexe B, for letters of the banks. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION I 57 the work of the meeting was practically over.' The convention had been disappointing. Not only had it taken no definite steps toward a better policy, but it had raised the coinage quotas. The year 1875 was characterized by considerable progress in foreign monetary measures. The German and Scandinavian reforms approached consummation. In Holland, the second chamber on May 2, and the first chamber on June 4, passed the law providing for the introduction of the gold standard. In Austria, men were seriously considering the question of securing a gold circulation. Spain alone offered an unrestricted field for silver. In the meantime the favorable movement of gold into the Latin Union continued. Germany had all along been trying to unload her surplus silver upon France. This attempt was now appar- ently abandoned. The shipment of German silver coin to France had been 1.8 million hectograms in 1872, 2.6 millions in 1873, and 9.7 millions, in 1874. For the first half of 1875, it was insignificant. On February 6 heavy shipments of gold from London to Paris were announced.'^ During the preceding year, ■ We have said nothing in regard to the part played by Greece at the conference of 1875. An earlier chapter has given an account of the admission of Greece to the Union soon after the formation of the league. Greece had not, hitherto, been in a condition to join in adhering to the treaty of 1865. She now believed herself to be ready to become an active member of the Union, and accordingly commissioned a delegate to the conference. Up to the beginning of 1874 the regime of the Latin Union had been extended only to the Greek subsidiary coin (of which an issue of nine millions had been authorized), and, as this was not involved in the declaration of 1874, Greece had not been asked to join in its deliberations. Greece now professed a desire to issue the silver five-franc piece through the French mint, and made the demand (ibid., 1875, P- ^9) "^^' ^'^^ be allowed a quota computed on the basis of the coin existing in the other states and estimated according to population. This would mean a quota of about 75 millions. The allied countries, realizing that this would be a dangerous reactionary step, and probably seeing an opportunity to get rid of some of their own surplus silver, advised the Greek government to import from abroad whatever coin it might need in excess of five millions, which they set as the Greek coinage quota. {Ibid., 1875, pp. 71 ff.) Greece, accordingly, did not become a sharer in the new monetary agreement of 1875. 'London Economist, February 6, 1875, p. 145. 158 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION the Bank of France had increased its stock of bullion and coin by about 521 million francs and decreased its advances to the public by about 440 niillion francs. Owing to the cours forc^ the gold paid into the Bank of France could not be drawn out again without its consent. The result was to make commodities and securities cheap at Paris. Consequently, there was a steady bounty on all operations tending to send gold to Paris and correspond- ing discouragement to contrary operations. This fact alone is an excellent indication of the general trend of public opinion. The action of the Bank of France in beginning to redeem its 20-franc notes in gold was regarded as good evidence of the bank's intentions, and the restriction of the coinage was again coming to be regarded as a transitional step toward a gold standard ; for it now began to be seen that the depreciation of silver was not temporary, as had been supposed. In Belgium, Mr. Malou continued, notwithstanding the attacks made upon him, to pursue the policy of retaining the coinage under government control. We have noted that, in response to the demands of the bank, the administration had allowed this institution to deposit for coinage an amount nearly equal to 12 million francs. This would leave a net free quota of only three millions. A part of the bank's deposit of silver, however, seems to have been made by the bank as agent for the government, for during the year 9,612,873 francs were struck in five-franc pieces for government use' and only 5,291,831 for the exclusive use of the bank — in all an aggregate of 14,904,704 francs'" out of a possible 15 millions. The government realized on its share the sum of 265,922.18 francs, and this, as in the previous year, was carried to the account of the budget of ways and means, under the head of "accidental receipts" of the treasury. In France, the same suicidal policy as during the previous year was at first sustained. The coinage was left to the specu- lators during the first half of the year, but much dissatisfaction was ^ H. C. Report, 1876, p. 14, and Haupt, Histoire monltaire de notre Temps, f. 145. ° Conference monltaire internationale entre laBelgique,la France, la Grice, Vltalie, et la Suisse. Procis-Verbaux, 1875, Annexe B, p. 18. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION 1 59 beginning to be manifested in the chambers. The other coun- tries were seen to be reaping a rich harvest from their issues of coin, but France still allowed private individuals to take to them- selves the whole profit. Two parties existed, one demanding that the administration assume the whole charge of the coinage of silver five-franc pieces, the other that this coinage be alto- gether suspended. For the moment, the temporizing policy prevailed, and on June 25 the treasury began to deposit sil- ver at the mint for coinage.' During the year, the full quota, 75 millions, was struck, and of this 40,946,950 francs were for account of the treasury. The profit was 2,424,959 francs, or approximately 6 per cent. In Italy, likewise, the full quota was struck during 1S75. Individuals had for some time been practically debarred from the power to secure the free coinage of their silver, and this privilege was now at last definitely abrogated by the law of July 17, 1875, which prohibited the coinage of silver for account of individuals.'^ By this measure, Italy affirmed, once for all, her intention to adhere to the policy of governmental control of the coinage of silver. During 1875, Switzerland struck no siher five-franc pieces, but provided herself with a considerable supply of coin of the denominations of one and two francs, although some of these were issued to replace old coin withdrawn according to the agreement of 1865.3 As in the preceding year, the restriction on the coinage of silver proved a great stimulus to the coinage of gold, and in Belgium the gold coinage rose to the enormous sum of 82,685,- 060 francs during 1875.'* In France the output was 234,912,000 francs, 5 and in both Belgium and France the heterogeneous char- acter of the mint deposits ^ showed how gold was pouring in from all sides. In Italy, the coinage was small, amounting only to 2,244,440 francs. The reasons are unnecessary to mention. The 'Haupt, Histoire monetaire de notre Temps, p. 192. * Ibid., 1876, p. 20. ' Hid., p. 26b. ^ Ibid., -p. 2,9- 3 Conference monetaire, 1876, p. 24. ^ Ibid., pp. 20 and 39. l60 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION issue of bons de monnaie had been everywhere restrained. None had been issued by Belgium and Switzerland,' while Italy had by no means approached the amount allowed her,'^ nor had France made use of her full power in this respect, her total issue amount- ing to 29,569,922.30 francs for the coming year. 3 The conference of 1874 had been a disappointment; that of 1875 had been almost colorless. Little of a striking character had occurred in 1875. Nevertheless, it was more and more appreciated that it was unwise to allow the monetary system of the Latin Union any longer to rest upon so precarious a basis as that afforded by the annual agreements. A strong party was now demanding total suspension of the coinage of the silver five-franc piece, and it was clear that the meeting of 1876 would adopt some step looking to a firmer and more progressive policy. The groundlessness of the fears concerning the impossibility of resumption in gold had been shown by events. Nor did there seem to be any occasion to expect the threatened rise in the value of gold and general fall in gold prices. "i The improved commercial situation convinced many that the silver policy must not again be recurred to. The new meeting of the four powers had been set for Jan- uary 20, and the endeavor was now made to bring some influence to bear upon the conference from the side of the business interests. As early as December 18, 1875, M. Clapier had brought forward in parliament a bill whereby the coinage of silver five-franc pieces was to be limited in France to the sum of 50 millions for 1876,' and, on January 10, the Paris chamber of commerce addressed to the minister of commerce and agricul- ture a long communication urging the adoption of the gold standard.^ The meeting of 1876 was apparently no more than a repeti- tion and continuation of the two preceding ones. The silver ^lbid.,^.S. ^Ibid.,^.l(). 'Ibid., p. 8. ^ £conomtste Fran(ais, July 10, 1875, P- 49- i £conomisie Fran^ais, December 18, 1875, p. 770. ^For text, see Conference monetaire Internationale enire la Belgique, la France, la Grhe, I'ltalie, et la Suisse. Procis-Verbaux, 1876, Annexe A, p. 55. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION l6l controversy occupied but a very minor ])lace in the deliberations. Switzerland was still resolute in her demand for a gold stand- ard. She strongly urged the recognition of scientific monetary principles as embodied in the program of the gold party. If this were impossible, the federal council insisted that the quotas for the coming year should be cut down' — preferably by one half. At the same time, Belgium declared her wish that the quotas should once more be reduced to the figure allowed in 1874. The ideas of Italy were in accord with those of Belgium, and France herself simply expressed the wish to "continue, purely and simply, the restrictive clauses of the treaty of 1874."° The demands of Greece were more extensive. We have already seen how it was that she did not become a party to the treaty of 1875, by which she had been allowed a quota amounting only to 5 million francs. This amount, so it was now said, was not ade- quate to the first needs of her circulation. Had Greece been in a situation analogous to that of the countries of the Latin Union, her quota would have been sufficient, but her paper circulation, which she now desired to supersede by coin, and other impor- tant obstacles, stood in the way. The law which had rendered obligatory the payment of debts in coin of the union after January i, 1876, was necessarily abrogated, ^ for the 5 million francs struck and placed in circulation, in accord with the treaty of 1875, had proved entirely inadequate and to enforce the law would have brought on a crisis with alarming sud- denness. The total bank reserve of Greece was estimated at approxi- mately 22 millions. The existing amount of coin was said to be ten francs per capita. This, with a presumable population of 1.5 millions, would approximate i 5 millions. It was hardly likely that the total stock in existence could be less than 50 millions, but of this a large percentage was made up of Russian, German, and other coin. To replace these, an allowance of 25 millions was demanded. To secure them by importation from the other countries of the Latin Union was regarded by Greece as placing '/.}!r^>^of M. Say, however, after going through the usual formalities, became a law on August 5, 1876, and by a decree of August 6, in conformity with the powers allowed by the law, the coinage of silver five-franc pieces was suspended at the French mint and the reception of further bullion for deposit was forbidden.* An active demand for exchange on France followed closely upon the inception of this legislation. In some places, the price ^ Ibid.,]\ine 17, 1876, p. 775 ; alsoidid., 1876, p. 6386. 'JI. C. Report, 1876, Appendix, p. 97; a\iO Journal Officiel, 1876, p. 2251. ^Ibid., p. 2758 ; also H. C. Report, pp. 94-97. ^ Ibid,, 1876, loc, cit.; Journal Officiel, loc. cit. 5 It was unfavorably reported upon by M. Rouland, and this had great weight with the Chambers. See ibid., p. 4214. *P'or original law and decree,' see Bulletin des Lois, 1876, Partie Principale, 309- 331, pp. 30, 31. 1 66 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION was so high that it was cheaper for a debtor to ship coin.^ The bank reserve increased to the amount of 1927 million francs. Germany, in especial, was a heavy shipper of coin. Paper on France was quoted at 81.40 marks for 100 francs and for short term paper 81.35. Thus the German debtor found it cheaper to liquidate in gold.'' Germany, of course, did not regard this movement with favor. She had secured the gold for her mone- tary reform at considerable expense and now to see it flowing back into France was distasteful. The new marks were hardly coined when they were shipped to France, and it was once again demon- strated that the economic situation of Germany made the success of the new measures difficult. Gold flowed into France from London as well, but the Bank of England soon put a stop to this operation by raising its rate of discount. Considerable amounts of Turkish livres were also shipped during this period from Constantinople. In Russia, the rise of exchange on Paris was great. June 24, 1875, 100 rubles had been given for 352 francs at St. Petersburg; but 100 rubles were now worth only 329 francs. Great quantities of Russian imperials were sent to France in the early part of 1 876, sometimes by way of Berlin, sometimes directly. In Austria, too, the rise of paper on Paris was considerable. August 24, 1875, 44-20 florins were paid for zoo francs at three months from date. This figure soon rose to 44.75 and finally '^ icononiiste Fran^ais, April 29, 1876, p. 557. °The reason was this : 500 grams of gold malce 69.75 pieces of 20 marks. 1000 20-marlc pieces, .9 fine, would weigli 7.096495 liilograms. Although these coins were .9 fine, the Bank of France would only accept them at the fineness of .8995 or 3091.58 francs per kilogram. 1000 20-mark pieces, i. t., 20,000 marks, weighing 7.9695 kilograms would then yield 7.9605 X 3092.58 francs = 24,610.52 francs. Marks Marks 24,610.52 francs = 20,000 marks, or 100 francs = 81.26 Add expense of transportation, Berlin to Paris .08 Then cost of 100 francs in gold= 81.34 While a remittance in paper on Paris at 8 days from date cost at Berlin 81.35 Price of draft at sight, discount 8 days, at 4 per cent. .07 Cost of 100 francs in paper • 81.42 or .08 more than in gold. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION 1 67 reached 45.65. Within the Latin Union itself, gold flowed like- wise toward Paris. Considerable quantities were shipped from Bel- gium, and silver five-franc pieces were also sent to Paris in large amounts. In Italy, the same tendency was manifest, although the fluctuations were comparatively insignificant and subordi- nated to the price of the Italian rente. In general, the increase in the coin reserve of the Bank of France was due to shipments from abroad necessitated by the high price of exchange, but it was also unquestionably true that the new policy with regard to silver led to increased confidence, and consequently increased deposits of gold in the bank. In an earlier part of our study, we have now noted how Bel- gium had originally taken the lead in thp restrictive policy by the law of December 18, 1873, which had first inaugurated gov- ernmental coinage control in the countries of the Latin Union. This law, which was originally to expire July i, 1875, had been previously renewed without debate on April 27, 1875, for the remainder of the current year but had now expired.' M. Malou desired to have it renewed, and to this end he presented to the Chambre des Repr^sentants, on April 25, 1876, a law continuing the statute which gave the power into the hands of government. Ihe expos^ des motifs v^ 3.5 ?Lga.in long and full.' It reviewed the history of the Latin Union since the inauguration of coinage restriction in 1874. M. Malou's views on the silver situation were of interest. 3 He pointed to the fact that there existed no "plethora" of silver. In this, he apparently took no account of the heavy stock of silver still carried by the Bank of France. He predicted that no essential change in the union would occur before 1880, the time when the original treaty would expire. The bill was accordingly passed and became a law.* ^ Documents Parlementaires ; Chambre des ReprSsentants, Session 1874-5, Nos. 81 and 82, Senat, same Session, No. 64. °See H. C. Report, 1876, Appendix, 108, for text ; also Moniteur Beige, April 26, 1876. 3 Ibid. < In the meantime, the public controversy going on in the press contemporaneously with the legislative debates, did not slacken. An interesting polemic was sustained in 1 68 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Nevertheless, it was clear that silver was becoming more dis- trusted, and the fall of the silver rupee in India was merely a sign of the times. It had been quoted at 25.5 d. in 1869, but now it had fallen to is. and gd. — a fall of about 18 per cent.' It was feared that all transactions in India would be suspended. The same process had been gone through in France. Before 1850, when only silver was to be had, exchange in Paris on London had varied 3 per cent. After 1850, when gold was remitted, it varied only about i per cent. In Holland, too, the transition to the gold standard had been marked by the same reduction in fluctuations. Prior to that time, the Dutch bank had with difficulty overridden many periods of severe strin- gency, and it was notorious that at many times the bank was laboring under the greatest difficulties.'' Up to July 1876, gold La Siicle between Cernuschi and Victor Bonnet. The Societi de V £,conomie Politique discussed the monetary problem at great length in all its bearings (see Economiste Fran(ais, i8y6, p. 329, zxiA Journal des £conomistes, April 1876, for proceedings; also Annales du Societi de V Aconomie Politique, i8y6, 2), and Cernuschi issued a pamphlet in which he advocated a bimetallic union between the United States, France, Germany, and England as the means of "monetary pacification," although he indi- cated no method for securing the establishment of such a union. The debate was con- tinued in such publications as the Revue des Deux Mondes, I'Officiel, and others. ' Mconomiste Pranfais, 1876, p. 294. ''Compare Pconomiste Pranfais, February 19, 1876, p. 233. According to the law of 1844, 100 Dutch florins ought to weigh i kilogramme of the fineness of .945 pure silver. If 945 grammes represent 100 florins, 1000 grammes ought to produce 105.81 florins, but the Dutch mint only gave as the product of coinage 104. 75 florins. The difference was supposed to represent the cost of coinage, alloy, etc. The arbi- tragists were, however, certain to obtain from the Dutch mint 104.75 florins. Conse- quently, they bought silver in the English market, and there remitted in payment paper on London at 11.90 florins per pound sterling. Estimating the profit on the operation, we find I kilogramme = 1000 grammes silver ; 31. i grammes = I ounce fine ; 37 ounces fine=40 ounces standard; i ounce standard=58 florins ; ;^l^ii.90 florins. Therefore i kilogramme of silver would cost about - 99.97 florins Transportation, insurance, brokerage, loss of interest, etc. .74 florins Total cost 100.71 Mint pays per kilogramme 104.75 Profit 4.04 or about 4 per cent. In October 1874, the Dutch government suspended the coinage of silver. The result was a rise of exchange on Amsterdam, since it was now impos- sible to send silver into Holland, and the gold standard was not yet adopted. The THE PERJOD OF RESTRICTION 169 20-franc pieces continued much in demand throughout Europe. They were especially preferred at Berlin and a premium of about .3 per cent, on them made its appearance.' At the same time the favorable state of exchange, which had been of so much assistance to France and the Latin Union, was interrupted. A slight premium on the gold 20-franc piece was noted at Paris, and although it did not exceed .1 per cent, it was regarded as an unfavorable system.^ In Belgium, the abundance of silver made the exchanges rise to the point which permitted the expor- tation of coin, and considerable withdrawals of foreign coin were observed. The bank reserve fell off slightly, and " napo- leons" in quantities of some magnitude were sent to Paris. ^ In Italy, the market was in a quiescent condition during July,"* but in France the bank reserve decreased steadily though slowly. The same tendency to diminution in bank reserves was noted in Belgium and Switzerland, although this was partly due to a lower discount and extended accommodations to the public. However, as the year began to wane and the time for another conference appeared in sight, an easier condition of the market became manifest. Shipments of coin from Belgium to Paris almost ceased, 5 and from October 12 to October 25 the reserve result was of course a great need of paper on Amsterdam. Exchange even rose to 216 francs for TOO florins. A solution of the monetary problem was imperative. The Cham- bers of Commerce of Amsterdam and Rotterdam addressed themselves to the Minister of Finance and demanded settlement of the question either one way or the other in order to render commerce more stable. At the beginning of March 1875, the Dutch bank announced that it would receive gold as security. This favored the importa- tion of gold, and large quantities were shipped in from Belgium. Paper fell to 214 francs 50 centimes. In the meantime, the finance minister had prepared a law introducing the single gold standard, that is to say, it allowed free coinage of gold while maintaining the interdict on silver coinage. As soon as the scheme was known, exchange began to rise at Amsterdam. The bank then began to buy gold, though the price it had to pay rose from 1621 florins per kilogramme to 1642.50 florins. Exchange on Amsterdam became unsalable. The bank acted with great prudence throughout. •^ liconomiste Franfais, July I, 1876, p. 9. 'Ibid., July 22, 1876, p. 105. 'Ibid., July I, 1876, p. 9. ^Ibid., July I, 1876, p. 9 ; and August 5, 1876, p. 177. ^Ibid., September 30, 1876, p. 439. 170 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION of the Bank of France rose 37 millions,' while no more coin was shipped to London from Paris. Twenty-franc pieces again became scarce at Berlin, for exchange was now again in favor of France, and French coin flowed homeward. Switzerland's money market was quiet, and Italy was the only country. of the Latin Union where unfavorable symptoms were observed. In the course of its many vicissitudes, the price of the Italian rente had, by November, sunk unusually low, and the paper currency had depreciated along with it. Gold was now quoted at 9.5 per cent, premium.' Notwithstanding the general good condition of the money market, debate on the bimetallic question did not lessen. Bel- gium had hitherto been the first of the countries of the Latin Union to inaugurate new policies. She was not now unfaithful to her old tendencies. The party of monetary reaction had for some time been losing ground, and when, on December 6, 1876, a bill providing for the complete and indefinite suspension of the coinage of the silver five-franc piece was introduced in the Chambre des Reprdseiitants, it easily secured the support of a majority .3 It had long been noticed that M. Malou, once a theo- retic bimetallist, had been drifting toward the opposing policy, undeterred by the accusations of defection which were showered upon him. His former opinions now, however, reasserted them- selves, and when the more radical spirits in the chamber, encouraged by the success of the measure of the 6th, attempted to secure the introduction of a bill limiting the legal-tender quality of the silver five-franc piece to 100 francs at each pay- ment, he manifested alarm, and at once threw the weight of the ministry upon the other side. The demand for. the new measure was unheeded, and Belgium had to be satisfied with the introduction of the so-called ^talon boiteux or limping standard, by which was understood the monetary regime which permitted the full legal-tender quality of both metals while allowing the free coinage of but one, and which seems to have been an almost ' Ibid., November 25, 1876, p. 693. ^ Ibid. ^Journal des £conomistes, 1877, i. I, p. 1 10. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION 171 unavoidable transition stage in the monetary history of many countries. Some, indeed, have never been able to pass from under its domination, and of these the Latin Union now stands as a conspicuous example. It is extremely doubtful whether the immediate adoption of the single gold standard by Belgium alone would have been either prudent or successful. It is likely that such a measure would have forced out of the country a con- siderable amount of silver which would have found a home in the allied countries, and probably chiefly in France. Had France adopted, as a retaliatory measure, a' law similar in nature to the one just passed in Belgium, the silver five-franc piece, if unsus- tained by a promise of redemption, must have suffered a great and sudden fall. This would have forced a monetary crisis whose outcome would be hard to infer. If no such measure had been adopted in France, it is probable that the irritation which was felt in many quarters over the effect of the Latin Union would have precipitated a break-down of the whole structure, and that the five-franc pieces of Belgium would have been so used as to force them back into their native country, where they must either have been redeemed or have suffered depreciation. The year 1877 was to be an almost colorless period. No marked advance in a further elaboration of a scheme for the amelioration of the monetary situation was attained on any side, and it was not until the close of the year that monetary events again began to possess an intense interest. Even the regular annual conference was not a feature" of the period. Monetary feeling in all the countries was by this time well defined, and all were evidently waiting for January i, 1880, when they would be freed from the obligations entailed by the treaty of 1865, and could reconstruct that act, if so desired, upon a new and more satisfactory basis. The yearly conferences had, at the last two meetings, been found unprofitable events, and they had con- tributed nothing new to monetary knowledge. The countries were now so evidently and clearly at one in desiring continued restriction that it was not deemed worth while by the French administration to go to the trouble of convoking a conference 172 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION at the opening of the year. Diplomatic communications were therefore addressed to the allies with the proposition that the quotas of the coming year be fixed at one-half those of the pre- ceding year, and that no meeting of delegates be held. The suggestion was accepted, and the plan of holding annual con- ferences was a thing of past history. This fact in itself is significant. We have emphasized the so-called "expectant" attitude which France represented herself as preserving. With the sacrifice of the annual conference plan, this attitude broke completely down. The plan of annual 1 conferences was nomi- nally taken up with the object of maintaining such pliability and mobility in the monetary system that it could at any time be altered, in accord with circumstances. Now, the conferences were given up on the ground that their decisions would be a foregone conclusion. It was a distinct step in the evolution, and marked a considerable advance toward a stable policy. France still continued to be the recipient of large sums in gold." Confidence was being rapidly restored, and deposits in the bank were increasing very rapidly ,° while the specie reserve kept pace with them. 3 Large amounts of gold were shipped in from Brussels and London. ■• In February, the reserve was still on the increase, and the bank became unwilling to receive foreign gold coin and ingots for notes save at a commission of i per cent.s The reason was said to be the heavy tax on the notes, which led the bank to desire to retire a part of its note circula- tion which was not now greatly in excess of the specie held. Notes of 50 and 100 francs it was especially anxious to with- draw, and it showed itself little disposed to give notes for gold to merchants who demanded them.* Despite the continuous inflow of gold, fears were continually entertained that this state of things would not be of long duration-. More and more eagerly did France watch the course of contemporaneous monetary events, for she knew that the years before 1879 must decide the *■ London Mconomist^ January 20, 1877, P- 65. = 7^20'., May 26, 1877, p. 605. ^Ibid. * Ibid. ^ &conomisie Franfais, February 24, 1S77, p. 243. ^ Ibid. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION 1 73 immediate fate of the Latin Union. The market price of silver afforded no hope. After rising at the beginning of the year, silver had again rapidly fallen, and still displayed a strong down- ward tendency. The work of the American monetary commission was not encouraging. France looked upon its discussions as puerile, or as dictated by the cries of a special interest, and the unfavorable opinion of American legislators, which had for some time been entertained, was considerably intensified.' The United States was not likely to help her in rehabilitating silver. From Ger- many not a great deal more trouble was to be anticipated. Her sales of silver would soon end. This fact, nevertheless, did not seem to yield the satisfaction which had previously been expected, nor did it apparently exercise the slightest influence in buoying up the price of silver. The countries which, it was hoped, would by their substitution of silver for paper, afford a market for the metal, remained almost passive. Some stirrings were visible in Austria, and a slightly bettered condition was noted in Italy, but discerning eyes could see that not for a long time could either of these countries, even if so disposed, afford any relief. In Russia, the case was even more hope- less. Altogether the prospects for the immediate rehabilitation of silver were not bright. French bimetallists began to lose hope, and public opinion was so definitely expressed that it became understood that "the artificial policy of the Latin Union had completely broken down."^ Still, some of these facts were regarded as unworthy to cause alarm. Germany was not finding it easy to substitute gold for her silver. The political crisis in France, the delicate condition of the eastern problem, and the European uncertainty arising therefrom, were regarded as dis- turbing influences, while the operations of the syndicate con- trolling the Russian loan had no doubt led to the congestion of ^ Aconomiste Franfais, April 7, 1877, p. 427. ' London Economist, ]n\y 7, 1S77, p. 791. Ci. aXso £conomiste FrancaiSj'ixily 21, 1877, p. Si. 174 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION silver at Berlin and the losses of gold already mentioned." Certainly, the future was doubtful, and the Bank of France, in view of the favorable situation, deemed the moment opportune for an attempt to expel from its vaults some part of the large sums of silver therein contained. True, such attempts had hitherto been regarded with extreme disfavor by the public, but now it was hoped that resistance would be overcome, and the tax imposed on the notes, which in one year^ had amounted to the sum of 3,732,653 francs, was put forward as an excuse for withdrawing the notes and replacing them with silver. In reality, such a measure was sure to encounter strenuous opposi- tion. The years since the great war had witnessed an immense development of the use of credit instruments in wholesale and retail transactions, and the attempt to return to payments made in sacks of five-franc pieces was sure to arouse opposition. The attempt was first made in the outlying districts. Com- plaints were heard from all sides. 3 The reactionary policy of the bank with regard to silver continued throughout the year.* Not only did the lOO-franc notes continue to be withdrawn, but the bank announced its determination no longer to receive for- eign silver coin [i. e., coin of countries outside the union — nota- bly Spanish and South American) on deposit, except under unfavorable conditions. 5 It was unquestionably in pursuance of this policy that the bank was following out its plan for expelling silver from its vaults into the circulation. It was true that the tax upon notes was rather heavy, but it could scarcely be believed that this was the prime cause of the bank's action. In reality, it was merely eager to force into circulation some part, at least, of the 700 or 800 millions of francs which were in its vaults, and it probably thought to open an enlarged field for their circulation by the retirement of some notes. Nothing could be more injurious to ^ Rconomiste Franfais, September 29, 1877, p. 398. ' 1873. 3 For text of letters see Aconomiste Franfais, October 13, 1877, p. 456. ''Jiconomiste Franfais, November 24, 1877, p. 657. 5Cf. London Economist, August 11, 1877, p. 952. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION 1 75 the bank than to offend its clientele, but it still persevered, though complaints against the monopolization of the privilege of issuing notes were now and then heard.' Repeated com- plaints of an insufficient supply of money were continually heard at Paris in consequence of the withdrawal of the lOO-franc notes. ° There was an abundance of silver, but, as the belief seemed to be that it could not be used in large business trans- actions, it might almost as well not have been in existence. Much of the inconvenience to the community was caused by the uncertainty of the bank concerning the future. At some times, it was willing to disburse gold ; at others, the contrary was the case. At all times, it was anxious to liquidate in silver, when possible. In the meantime, the cours forc^ reached its close. On Jan- uary I, 1878, the debt of the state to the bank had, as required by the law of August 3, 1875, Art. 28, been reduced to 300 millions, the small balance of 750,000 francs which was left, rep- resenting only interest.^ The notes were still to continue as legal money, and could be used in payments to the state. "• This had a tendency to relieve the situation. The bank could not force the public to receive silver, since that might lead to a premium on gold. At present, it need have no fear of being obliged to pay gold, since exchange was such as to render its export unprofitable. The attempt to force silver upon the pub- lic had, so far, been a signal failure, and the bank began to see that it must not go too far in this effort. The year 1878 opened favorably. France was in a very satisfactory financial condition. During 1877, she had filled the unique position of creditor of the world. 5 In September (1877) alone, the import of gold and silver had amounted to 115,526,830 francs, of which 11,119,970 francs was in gold bullion and 84,653,700 in gold coin. The import from England, Germany, and Italy, was greatly on the ^Aconomiste Franfais, October 20, 1877, page 495, and January 5, 1878, p. 17 et seq, ''London Economist, January 19, 1878, p. 63. ^Ibid., p. 64. ■•Mathieu-Bodet, Les Finances Franfaises de 1870 a 1878, vol. i. p. 20 1. ^London Economist, December i, 1877, p. 1424. 176 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION increase.' More and more, the silver standard was coming to be regarded as impracticable. The vote on the Bland bill in the United States was unfavorably regarded by the French.'' The message of President Hayes, in which he urged that the treasury bonds should be loyally and honestly paid in gold, was regarded with respect. 3 Only a year remained before the treaty of 1865 was sure to be renounced. Public opinion demanded that it should not be renewed on the old terms. In the meantime, it was desired to suspend the coinage of silver and, a,s the states were still in accord on this point, no conference was called. France, as in the preceding year, simply addressed diplomatic communications to the allies with the proposal that, for the year 1878, no coinage of silver be allowed.'* Italy had not yet com- pleted the recoinage of her old coin, and she therefore made objection to the arrangement. She was, however, by common consent, allowed an extraordinary quota of 10 millions to cover the recoinage, and it was further agreed that, in the course of the year, a conference should be held to consider the expediency of a reformation of the Latin Union, and, if advisable, to elab- orate a new treaty. As the year 1873 is, in everyone's mind, associated with the great fall in the value of silver and the entrance of commercial nations upon a period of storm and stress, so the year 1878 is associated with decisive steps in monetary legislation. The International Monetary Conference, and the Conference of the Latin Union, were the two most striking monetary events of the year. Many other occurrences mark the period as pecul- iarly noteworthy. The year opened with a continuation of the policy of suspension by France. Now that the conference of the Latin Union for the year had been prorogued, it was neces- sary to secure further powers for the continued suspension of the coinage. During the last week in January, a bill was introduced '■Ibid., October 27, 1877, p. 128. '&conom.iste Fran^ais, December 15, 1877, p. 747. ^/Hd., December 8, 1877, p. 722. *" Report of Feer-Herzog to Swiss Union of Commerce and Indusiry," Journal des Aconomisies, iSyS, ii. r, 258. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION 1 77 into the chambers by M. Say,' which provided for the pro- longation of the government power of suspension until the end of March 1879. The bill was referred to a committee" which, in its report upon the measure, explicitly advised the government against a renewal of the Latin Union ^ and invited it to take steps for the abolition of the monetary compact. Many expressed surprise at this part of the report, and the general opinion was adverse to accepting the recommendations on this head. The minister of finance refused to admit that the present legislation was a step toward the gold standard.* He also thought that, if the Latin Union was to be continued, it must be remodeled. The convention was disadvantageous for France, with regard to countries where specie payments were suspended. Italian coin flowed into France and, while it could be returned, the bank notes in which payment would be made were depreci- ated fully as much as the silver. About 500 millions of foreign silver was now in the vaults of the bank. As to the suspension of coinage, there could be no doubt. France had already, to all intents, given up the double standard. = It was easy to read between the lines of the reservation made by Say when the question had come before the senate. They were mere ofificial expressions of impartiality. The government was of course granted the power it asked for. France " put the double stan- dard into fetters." In the session of January 25, 1878, the senate* adopted, by a unanimous vote of 244, the government bill continuing the law of August 5, 1876.' Contemporaneously, ^Journal Offi-ciel^ i8yS^ p. 267; also London Rconoviist^ February 2, 1878, p. 124. ^Journal Officiel, 1878, p. 408. ^Ibid.,-p. 1052. ''Ibid., p. 797. ^ Ibid.; also London Economist, March 9, 1878, p. 265. ^Cf. discussions before Chambre des T)€^\A€i, Journal Officiel, pp. 818, 920, 1061, 1349. "^ Ibid., p. 797 ; also £.conoiniste Fran^ais, February 2, 1878, p. 146. Tbe bill was signed and became a law on January 31, 1878. For text see also Bulletin de Statistique et de Legislation Comparee, 1878, i. p. 69. It ran as follows : The Senate and Chamber of Deputies have adopted, The President of the Republic promulgates the law which follows : Single Article — The provisions of the law of August 5, 1876, relative to the coin- age of silver five-franc pieces are today continued up to March 31, 1879. The present law discussed and adopted by the Senate and Chamber of Deputies shall be executed as a law of the state. Done at Versailles, January 31, 1878. (Signed, etc.) I 78 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION the fall of the Malou ministry in Belgium and the inauguration of the Liberal ministry under the leadership of Frere-Orban" gave promise of a radical anti-silver policy. One of the most interesting events of the year was to be the International Monetary Conference held in Paris in August, 1878. The second section of the Act of the United States Con- gress, passed February 23, 1878, provided for the extension of an invitation to the various European governments" to join in a general meeting for discussion of the monetary problem. We shall, of course, mention only those events in the history of the conference which were connected with the Latin Union. Public opinion throughout the union was at first decidedly hostile to the idea of such a conference. When the conference was announced the Moniteur predicted that its work would be a "laudation by the United States of the ratio of 16 to i and of that of 15^^ to I by the French."'' For some time, it was doubtful whether the states of the Latin Union would accept the invitation of the United States to be present. On May 4, it was announced 3 that the smaller states had accepted. It was not yet known what France would do. Her course might be guessed from a statement by M. Parieu in which he suggested that", in assisting the United States in the rehabilitation of silver by affording a market for her metal, the Latin Union would be likely to be duped. Other publicists sustained this view, and the general opinion was that silver had had its day in France.'* In the early part of June, a dispatch from Washington announced that all the states of the Latin Union except Belgium had accepted the invitation. = There could be no doubt as to how Belgium would instruct her delegates to the conference, now that the Frere-Orban ministry was in power. Public sentiment in Belgium — always inclining to the side of the gold standard — was now running strongly in favor of it.* ^London Economist, June 22, 1878, p. 728. 'Compare London Economist, March 30, 1878, p. 363. 'iUid.,M.z.y 4, 1878, p. 517. '* £conomiste Eran(ais, May 11, 1878, p. 597' ^London Economist, June 15, 1878, p. 697. ''Ibid., April 13, 1878, p. 423. THE PERIOD OF RESTRICTION 1 79 The International Monetary Conference was duly opened at the ministry of Foreign Affairs in Paris in August 1878.' We may very briefly recapitulate the attitude taken by the Latin Union at this conference. Belgium was the most radical of the countries. M. Pirmez declared that "the double standard results in organizing mone- tary crises." Belgium, therefore, could not accede to the demands of the United States for the rehabilitation of silver. ° Practically the same ground was taken by Switzerland. Italy and Greece were wavering. They were naturally prone to inflation, but were bound hand and foot to their monetary allies. France was very cautious. M. Leon Say made some contradictory statements, and belied the opinion he had formerl}' expressed in his speech of March 22, 1876, before the French Senate. 3 He explained why the Latin Union had practically suspended coin- age of silver and harped upon the attitude of "expectancy, from which we shall not move except for good reasons, when they present themselves, and then probably to enter upon the S3'stem of the double standard.""* He was, however, careful to explain that France had all the silver she could handle at present and wanted no more. He refused to express any opinion with regard to the rehabilitation of silver, and remarked that the proposition of the United States was premature. He admitted that "it was hardly possible to see in the Latin Union a body entirely united," but assured the United States that France was sincerely bimetallic at heart. In general, France emerged from the conference at the same point where she entered it. Her old opinions had merely been hardened ; they had undergone little evolution. 5 This was also true of her allies." So far as the Latin Union was concerned, the conference of 1878 was a failure. 'See Journal Officiel, 1878, pp. 8599 et seq., 8634 et seq. = Cf. j&conomiste Franfais, August II, 1878, pp. 261-263; and see Journal Officiel^ loc. cit. '^London Economist, September 14, 1878, pp. 1083, 1084. ^ Report of International Monetary Conference of 1878, pp. 55 et seq. 5 With this view compare Economiste Erancais, September 7, 1878, pp. 295, 296. ^ See. Journal Officiel, 1878, p. 8921, etc. I80 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION In the meantime, the favorable commercial situation of France remained unchanged. During the first four months of 1878 exports and imports of precious metals were as follows: Import (francs) Export (francs) Gold bullion 6,810,672 835,920 Gold coin 83,324,480 15,490,400 Silver bullion 27,342,480 2,455,400 Silver coin 35,190,860 13,249,400 The import of coin from Belgium alone was in April 8,686,720 francs gold and 9,843,160 francs silver.' The outlook in Belgium, too, was bright. Exchange was in a favorable con- dition and commerce was active. In Italy prospects were visibly better, and Switzerland was commercially sound. ^London Economist, May 25, 1878, p. 615. CHAPTER XV. THE CONFERENCE OF 1878. With the Conference of 1878, the Latin Union entered upon an entirely new phase of its existence. The question whether or not new issues of silver should be allowed had practically been settled, and the treaty of 1878 merely embodied a principle whose adoption had been decided upon beforehand. The new era upon which the Latin Union was entering was one which was to be characterized by a struggle with difficulties induced during the foregoing period. Its primary object — to afford a remedy for the difficulties experienced in regard to the subsidiary coin — had been removed, not many years after the inauguration of the Union, by the disappearance of the circumstances which had led to the formation of the league. This being the case, it may, at first sight, be considered strange that the Latin Union was not dissolved in 1879 at the expiration of the treaty of 1865. In the last chapter, however, it was seen that Belgium was a large holder of French silver, and vice versa that France afforded a circulation to considerable quantities of Italian silver, and that French coin was diffused to a less extent throughout the whole of the Latin Union. It must also be borne in mind that, although French coin formed a con- siderable percentage of the circulation of the monetary allies, yet the actual amount of the French circulating medium still at home was much greater than that of any other of the countries. In a word, France possessed much more of their coin than they did of the French coin. This at once gives the reason for the continued existence of the Latin Union. For each of the smaller countries to redeem its own coin would be a difficult matter ; and thus the countries of the Latin Union were bound firmly to France by the diffi- culty of redeeming their coin. In addition to this motive for 181 1 82 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION the preservation of the league, there were, of course, the original desires for a uniform international coinage circulating throughout the four countries. These are familiar and we need not further discuss them. The outcome of the Conference of 1878 was at no time doubtful, although there were those, who were continually hop- ing that the Latin Union would be dissolved. The delegates to the International Monetary Conference of August were, in the main, the same as those who were to attend the conference of the Latin Union to be held in October. While in attendance upon the sessions of the International Monetary Conference, they had had several meetings and their instructions became known before the October conference.' Several things manifested the general spirit that now pervaded the Latin Union. The report of M. Guyot, submitted to the Chambre des D^puUs of France on the International Monetary Conference of 1878, gave a thorough account of the conference and the outcome was distinctly adverse to silver. Similar was the bulky report presented to the Belgian chambers by M. Pirmez and analogous conclusions were reached. The report presented to the High Swiss Federal Council was even more radical in its utterances. Some time even before this, M. Feer-Herzog had, at the request of the Swiss Union of Com- merce and Industry,'^ expressed the ideas of the Swiss govern- ment upon the monetary question in a report which he presented in a letter of June 21. He referred to the history of the Latin Union and enlarged upon the state of things in France where, it will be remembered, the bank had unsuccessfully been trying to force silver into the hands of the public, the attempt resulting in the deposit of about three five-franc pieces in the bank for every two forced out by it.3 In the other countries, the same feeling •■ Aconomiste Franfais, March 8, 1879, p. 287. One official session of the confer- ence was held August 30 (see Conference monltaire internationale entre la Belgique, la France, r Italic, la Grice ei la Suisse, Prods -Verbaux, 1878) but the Greek and Italian delegates having received no instructions it was deemed best to postpone the conference to October t. "For text, s&& Journal des Aconomistes, 1878, ii. I, 258. ^ Revue des Deux Mondes, January i, 1878. THE CONFERENCE OF I878 I83 against silver was strongly marked, and there could be now no doubt as to the outcome of the Conference of 1878. We have commented upon the existence of a certain party that desired the dissolution of the union. There was yet another body of opinion that favored the immediate demoneti- zation of silver by the conference. The International Conference for the unification of weights, measures, and money voted that "the conference is of the opinion, conformably to the belief already expressed by the International Conference of 1867, that the first basis of monetary uniformity should be the single standard; and, in consequence, the gold standard."' Neither of these parties had much influence in the conference, which represented the fairly conservative tendencies. The recommendations of the Bank of France, already mentioned, found little favor. The general tendency was to preserve intact the status quo until suitable means for a change should be in sight. On October i, the representatives of France, Belgium, Swit- zerland, Italy, and Greece, twelve in number, assembled at the Mtel of the French ministry of foreign affairs at Paris. The debates continued through eleven sessions, the last of which occurred on November 5. In general, we may regard the Conference of 1878 as a debate on the measures to be adopted with reference to Italy. The other countries were now practically in accord on the immediate policy to be pursued. Italy alone was still anxious for further coinage of silver five- franc pieces. The interest of the other countries was to hold this desire in check, and by slow steps to bring her to redeem her coin. This also was France's position with regard to Bel- gium. As the president of the conference, M. Leon Say, remarked at the outset, " nothing was more desirable than the continuance of the Latin Union." The condition of Italy came up for discussion on October i under the form of a deliberation on the question of modifying Art. i of the Treaty of 1865, which constituted the original four countries a union so far as concerned their gold and silver coin, in such a ^ £conomiste Francais, October 26, 1 878, pp. 528, 529. 1 84 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION way as to include paper money. In the course of this discus- sion a debate arose upon the cours ford} M. Pirmez of Belgium expressed his belief that the difficulties encountered from the five-franc piece — especially by the bank of France — were due to the influx of Italian silver into the other countries. He believed that the Latin Union should take some steps toward regulating or restricting issues of paper money within its limits. ° This attack at once aroused the Italian representatives. Accord- ing to M. Ressman,3 Italy could promise nothing. She was working, he said, toward the abolition of the cours forc^, and no engagements which might be exacted from her could force her forward more rapidly. The first step toward abolition was, he thought, the withdrawal of the small notes, and this Italy was prepared to undertake. This would be a first step toward redemption of the five-franc pieces. M. Baralis thought that Italy should not, however, fail to coin the five-franc piece, since such coinage would be necessary in order to render pos- sible the prospective retirement of the small notes. Further, there still remained some non-decimal and earlier Neapolitan coins which must be converted into new coin.* Some even expressed the opinion that, since Italy intended ultimately to redeem her five-franc pieces, there could be no objection to her resorting to new coinages to almost any amount. In other words, Italy was desirous merely to convert her debt into another form. The profit on the coinage of the over-valued five-franc pieces would make up for the loss incurred in redeeming the small coin and the prospect of having, at some time in the distant future, to redeem these five-franc pieces, even at an increased loss, was not sufficiently alarming to lead Italy to adopt a sounder method. Others maintained that such a redemption of the five-franc piece by Italy was by no means obligatory, and the assumption of it was merely a way of displaying good faith. These ingenious persons maintained that redemption of the five-franc piece was ^ Conference monetaire enire la Belgique, la France, V Italic, et la Suisse. Pi'ocis- Verbaux, 1878, p. 30. ^ Ibid.,-^.'i,letseq. ^ Ibid^-^.'yi et seq. >• Ibid.,-^. ■y). THE CONFERENCE OF 1 878 185 an absurdity. The treaty of 1865 had said nothing of such redemption, and the principle might be applied to gold with fully as great propriety as to silver.' The greatest stress was, however, laid on the justice of affording to Italy some compen- sation for the sacrifices about to be necessitated. ° The Belgians were, on the contrary, resolute to prevent further output of sil- ver, and they declared they could see no advantage in the pro- posed redemption if it were to be effected at the cost of addi- tional coinage of silver. Switzerland expressed the same ideas as Belgium. The three countries proceeded to make certain requirements of Italy as prerequisites to the formulation of another treaty. They were briefly these : 1. Redemption of subsidiary coin. 2. Withdrawal of notes of denominations less than five francs. 3. Agreement to issue no more five-franc pieces. However, the time proposed for the consummation of the transaction involving the payment for the coin was reasonably long. Five years were suggested. 3 Not much objection was made by Italy to the first two of these propositions, for it was clear that so much must be conceded to the wishes of the allies. It now remained to determine the method and details of the operation. It was primarily necessary that some measures be taken for insuring the continuance of the subsidary coin in Italy after its return, else the old difficulties would be repeated. Several plans were proposed for effecting this object. 1. Substitutions of small coin for small notes in such propor- tions as to render the retention of the coin necessary for carry- ing on business.'' 2. Removal of the legal-tender quality from the Italian subsidiary coin. 5 3. Elevation of the fineness from 835 to 900 thousandths.* ^ Ibid.,-p. ^0. ^IHd.,-p. i^T. ^Ibid.,f.s,%etseq. ''Ibid., p.41. •'Ibid., p. 47. ^Ibid.,-p. 51 et seg. 1 86 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION 4. Exclusion of subsidiary coin fr6m the cognizance of the new treaty.' The first of these was, of course an absolute prerequisite to any successful action in the matter. As long as the notes con- tinued to circulate, it was not likely that the coin could be maintained in circulation beside them. There could, therefore, be no opposition to the measure. Italy, however, proposed to with- draw each year for five years a sum equivalent to one fifth of the total amount of subsidiary coin in existence. ° This was not a very useful means of procedure. Depreciated notes, even if reduced in amount, would be sure to drive out the silver put in circulation each year, and the notes would be, for some time, likely to remain below par, since the prospect of complete redemption was to be postponed, according to this scheme, for five years. Thus, the only result might be a comparative scarcity of currency. There could be no doubt that the second of the measures proposed would afford some assistance in retaining the Italian coin within the country. Moreover, it would relieve the foreign banks from the necessity of receiving and holding it in stock. Although it was possible that, as was feared, mone- tary habits in the matter of receiving the coin might enable some of it again to flow into foreign territory, yet, on the whole, the provision was sure to be beneficial. The wisdom of the two remaining measures was far from certain. They need little explanation to render their object clear. It was hoped that by restoring the subsidiary coin to the old or "normal" fineness of .9 which it had possessed during the long period prior to 1865, the additional value of the coins thus attained would render them less liable to exportation. This would, nevertheless, be a very serious step. Not only had the countries just been able, after a long period of withdrawal and substitution, to secure a tolerable uniformity in their subsidiary coin, but to return to the old fineness would involve considerable expense 3 which they were unwilling to incur. Besides, the measure would not go to the root of the matter since, in the disturbed state of ^ Ibid., pp. 41 and 51-53. "Ibid., p. 47. ^ Ibid., p. 53. THE CONFERENCE OF 1 878 1 8/ Italian exchange, the intrinsic value of the coin was frequently indifferent, the profits arising chiefly from fluctuations in the rate of the exchange.' Of course, the reasons that in 1865 had dictated a reduction of the fineness of the coin" were now no longer valid, on account of the depreciation of silver, and the question of restoration to the old fineness was merely a matter of expediency. Some speakers even went so far as to stigmatize the action taken in 1865, in lowering the fineness, as useless. ^ Others approved the measures of 1865, even while advocating a change at present.* Little need be said on the fourth point. To exclude the subsidiary coin from the treat}^ provisions would be an injurious policy as well as a radical departure from the original object of the union. It was true that such a step might, by confining each country to the use of its own subsidiary coin, render it somewhat less easy for the Italian coin to leave the country, but the importance of the object thus attained would hardly justify the inconveniences to be overcome. On the other hand, certain other difficulties would thereby be obviated. The measure encountered so much opposition that it was clear it could not be carried. ^ The third of the three demands,* that of the cessation of coinage of the five-franc pieces, now once more came up for discussion. The preliminary debates which we have analyzed had very clearly manifested the temper of the different states. All the allies, except Italy and Greece, were anxious to interdict coinage of silver. ^ Greece had little weight in the council, so that Italy was practically alone in her wishes. It is well worthy of notice that the question of redeeming the five-franc piece was not brought up by any except French representatives. M. Leon Say, in particular, frequently recurred to the subject,^ and on one occasion he was sharply opposed by M. Ressman who characterized his demands as in disaccord '■Ibid., p. 52. ^Ibid., pp. 40, 53, 55, etc. "Cf. ibid., p. 54. ^ See supra, p. 181. ^Ibid., p. 54. ''Ibid., pp. 67-69 et seq. ^Ibid., p. 55. ^ E. g., ibid., p. 66. I bo HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION with "common sense."' M. Feer-Herzog was by far the most dispassionate of the speakers. He explained that since the adoption of the treaty of 1865 the establishment of the cours forc^ in Italy, and certain other circumstances, had introduced new elements into the problem of monetary consolidation, and that, in discussing the situation, it was consequently impossible to be guided by the strict letter of the Treaty of 1865." An increase in the stock of coined silver would be disastrous. It could not be carried. The union was now so heavily loaded with silver that a slight increase would have highly injurious effects. At present the course of exchange was wholly regulated by gold, and this condition must be maintained. These ideas were supported by the other members, and it was manifest that there was but one opinion in the conference. The obstinate resistance of the Italian delegates did not decrease. They declared that it was impos- sible to take any steps toward redemption of the notes, unless a quota of five-franc pieces should be allowed them, and they finally named 20 millions as the minimum desired,^ with a guarantee of reception of the coins on equal terms by the banks of France and Belgium. It was now decided to appoint a com- mittee which should draft a provisional agreement for considera- tion. On October 10 the committee accordingly reported a pro- visional treaty. Naturally the stipulations of the act with ref- erence to Italy were first taken up. These were chiefly contained in Art. 8 of the main document. It pro- vided that the other countries were to retire and cease to receive the Italian subsidiary coin, but that these coins should be restored to their original footing, from the time of the aboli- tion of the cours forcL When the operation should be com- plete the Italian government should no longer be required to redeem at its public treasury the subsidiary coin of the other states. "i This agreement was supplemented by an additional act • Ibid., p. 68. = Ibid., p. 69. 3 Jhid., p. 77. * Conference monitaire internationale entre hi Belgique, la France, V Italic, la Suisse, et la Grice, Procis-Verbaux, 1878, p. 94. THE CONFERENCE OF 1 878 I Sq in six articles, providing that the operation should be begun and concluded on dates to be specified, and that the coins should be deposited at certain places, to be designated thereafter. Three and one half per cent, was to be paid by the Italian gov- ernment on all coin so retired and reserved by the different governments, beginning with the day on which the Italian coin should cease to have international legal-tender quality. When- ever any sum in coin was shipped to the Italian government, the latter was to withdraw and destroy a sum in notes at least equal to such shipment. Payment for the coin was to be made in five equal annual installments, in bills payable at the capital of each of the creditor states. Expenses of withdrawal were to be borne by Italy.' It was further agreed, at the request of Italy, that the transaction should be managed by the French govern- ment, in order that Italy might have but one country with which to negotiate.'' In regard to the duration of the convention and the provi- sions for taking care of the five-franc piece, three propositions were made. The first was that of M. Feer-Herzog. It fixed the expiration of the treaty at January- i , 1 886, and, by tacit agree- ment, provided for the continuation of the treaty from year to year. The second originated with the Belgians and annexed to the stipulations of Feer-Herzog the provisions that no country under the regime of the cours forcS should have the right of secession, and that, in case of the defection of one or more coun- tries possessing more than one half the population of the Latin Union, the whole agreement should lapse. The French scheme substituted for this last provision the obnoxious demand that any seceding country should be bound to redeem in gold, prior to its secession, the silver five-franc pieces of its coinage held by the other states in excess of those of the other states held by it. This at once aroused violent opposition.^ Italy flatly refused to assent,* and Belgium, while eager to secure the redemption by Italy of the Italian coin in her own circulation, was not " Ibid., p. 95. 3 For debate, see ibid., pp. 98-205. 'Ibid., p. 96. ''Ibid., p. lOI. 1 90 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION anxious to establish the same rule of action for France and her- self. She was desirous of finding some substitute by which the provision of the act would not be likely to establish a dangerous precedent. M. Feer-Herzog expressed the opinion^ that, as these clauses were not likely to be approved by the different governments, it was useless to introduce them into the draft of the treaty, and that the solution must be looked for rather in the amelioration of the financial condition of Italy during the six years of the duration of the treaty. , One or two substi- tutes for the articles were proposed, but the suggestion of M. Feer-Herzog seemed to meet with the most approbation. This, it will be remembered, simply omitted all mention of the redemp- tion of the five-franc pieces. At the wish of certain delegates, resolutions to somewhat the same effect as the rejected articles were drawn up and ordered printed in the Proch-Verbaux, inas- much as it was deemed inexpedient to incorporate them into the treaty.'' The question of further coinage for Italy was relegated to a separate division of the agreement, which was annexed under the title of a Declaration. This provided for the coinage by Italy during the year 1879 of a quota of 20 million francs in five- franc pieces, but for the total abolition of the right to issue legal- tender silver throughout the states of the union thereafter, as well as for the discontinuance of the issue of the bons de monnaie. There was yet another important point to be brought up. Since 1865, population had been on the increase and the stock of fractional coin was quite generally regarded as inadequate, especially in view of the fact that the Italian coin was to be withdrawn and returned. Early in the year, when the subject of the new monetary conference had been broached, it had been remarked that, had it not been for the assistance derived from the Italian coin, subsidiary money must have become scarce in France. 3 Demands were soon made by Belgium, Italy, Greece, and Switzerland for increased quotas of small coin. Belgium ■ Ibid., p. 100. " For text of resolutions, see ibid., p. 148. '^London Econonist, April 20, 1878, p. 461. THE CONFERENCE OF 1676 IQ) asked for one million, Italy for 1 2 millions, Greece for i . 5 millions, and Switzerland for one million.' This would leave France the right to ask for ten millions, the separation of Alsace-Lorraine being considered as lowering the quota. ^ Some delegates were of opinion that the per capita basis of calculation should be lowered from six to five francs. 3 This belief was not general and, in summing up at the close, the president announced it to be the sense of the conference that the basis of six francs should be maintained,-' although he remarked that his own opinion led him to look with hesitation upon any proposal to increase the stock of subsidiary coin.' True, some of the increase was wanted by Switzerland and Italy for the recoinage of old or base coin, but in general the principle of increasing the stock was to be regarded as bad. Difficult and disputed points had now for the most part been settled,* and, on October 20, a complete draft of the treat}- was reported for action. Essentiall}-, it was the same as the treaty of 1865, with the modifications subsequently introduced. Changes had been made in a few minor particulars, but, on the whole, there was little alteration. Quotas of subsidiary coin were fixed, in accordance with the suggestions we noted, as follows: Francs Belgium 33,000,000 France and Algeria 240,000,000 Greece 10,500,000 Italy - 170,000,000 Switzerland 18,000,000' The article on counterfeiting (Art. 12) was amplified. One point deserves special mention. The coinage of gold five-franc pieces was suspended. This question had previousl}- been dis- cussed,^ but in an incomplete and unsatisfactory way. It had all ' Conference monetaire internationale entre la Belgique, la France, V Italic, la Suisse, et la Grice. Procis-Verbaux, 1878, p. 153. "Ibid., p. 154. ^Ibid., p. 154. '•Ibid., p. 156. "^ Ibid., p. 154. 'We need not here discuss the debates on counterfeiting (see ibid.. 109-142). They were long and minute. A compendium of penal legislation on the subject was added. ' Ibid., p. 162. "Ibid., p. 34 et seq. 192 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION along been complained that the gold five-franc piece was almost useless, being s,mall, light, and easily abraded. It had a ten- dency to accumulate in the bank vaults, and was little used in daily payments. The coinage had been small. To these considera- tions there now seems to have been added the hope of slightly enlarging the field for the circulation of the silver five-franc piece. The result was the suspension of the coinage of this piece of money by Art. 9. The coinage of silver five-franc pieces was, by the same article, abrogated until a unanimous accord on the subject should be established throughout the union. It now only remained to fix the details of the operations connected with the Italian redemption of subsidiary coin. These were relegated to a separate arrangement which was prepared by the subcommittee and reported on October 30.' Sections 1-3 stipulated that the operation of retirement should be performed between July I and December i, 1879, estimated the amount to be retired in France at 87 millions, and in the other countries at 13 millions, and provided for the shipment of these coins to the French government, which should conduct the transaction.'^ M. Feer-Herzog, at the final meeting, said : The Latin Union is to be renewed and confirmed. Governments and people will learn, no doubt with satisfaction, that the five states are not to cease to be united by the bond of a common monetary circulation, and we may hope that this union, established between them with regard to their coin- age, will continue to exercise a happy influence on their political and com- mercial relations.^ We shall now try to see how far these prognostications were verified. ' See Appendix I for translation of all this legislation. ' Conflrence monltaire internationale entre la Belgique, la France, V Italic, la Suisse, et la Grice, Prochs-Verbaux, 1 878, p. 172. ^Ibid., p. 192. CHAPTER XVI. ITALY AND THE TREATY OF 1878. Two fundamental principles had been established by the Treaty of 1878: 1. Suspension. 2. Redemption. It is true that the first may be considered as having been established earlier. It had, of course, been first adopted by national legislation. This, however, was the first time it had been found in crystallized form in the international monetary agreement.' The fact that Italy had, by exception, been allowed an extraordinary quota did not in the least infringe upon the general principle. Although this coinage was to be permitted, it had been fully demonstrated that further issues of silver would not be allowed. It would not be fair, perhaps, to claim the establishment of the second principle solely from a study of the treaty itself. That instrument had provided for the redemption, either in silver or gold, of the subsidiary coin alone. It may, therefore, be argued that the treaty had established no prece- dent for the redemption of standard coin. A study of the debates upon this instrument, however, leads to the belief that such a precedent was established. In the course of our analysis of^the arguments, one occasion was especially noted when it was desired to incorporate the principle of redemption in the treaty. Thus, it may be fairly said that the redemption of silver has been one of the bases of the Latin Union from 1878 to the present time. In this way, the treaty took the the first step toward monetary reform. The outcome of the conference did not become public for a short time, although the general provisions of the treaty were 'Cf. Fauchille, V Union monetaire Latine, son Histoire,\a Annates de P licole libre des Sciences politiques, October 15, 1886, p. 520 et seq. 193 194 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION unofficially published as early as November i6.' On November 6, the Journal Offlciel had announced that the treaty was to be renewed and that the modifications would be "those demanded by circumstances," although it did not say what these would be.° By the last of the month, however, M. Say had brought before the chamber of deputies a bill to ratify the new treaty. ^ This was voted by the chamber on its first reading,'* and was slowly passed from one to another of the necessary legislative formalities. In Belgium and Switzerland, the legislative assem- blies moved more quickly, and the treaty had been generally ratified when, on April 28, 1879, an unexpected obstacle appeared. It had been no secret that the treaty had not found favor in the eyes of the Italians. The French D^bats had early devoted an article to refuting the Italian objections. ^ These were of two kinds, economic and sentimental. The usual economic com- plaint was that the small coin, when returned and reissued, would be sure once more to be exported ; and, since Italy must in accordance with the treaty stipulations, withdraw a considerable volume of notes, she would thus suffer from a scarcity of currency and consequent inconvenience in commercial operations. The sentimentalists urged that Art. 7 of the treaty infringed upon national rights by placing the Italian monetary system under foreign supervision. The answer to this was, of course, that the objection applied equally to the treaty of 1865. In reality, only two courses were open to Italy: (i) either to withdraw from the union, take back and redeem from 100 to 120 millions of small coin, and, if France's attitude at the last meeting counted for anything, her five-franc pieces as well; or (2) to renew the treaty, suspend the coinage of silver, and withdraw a part of her paper. Neither of these policies suited the inflationists. ^ Aconomiste Franfais, November 16, 1878, p. 625. 'Cf. £conomiste Franfais, November 9, 1878. ^London Economist,'^ovemher\j,o, 1878, p. 1407. * Confirence monltaire entre la Belgique, la France, etc. Procis-Verbaux, 1879 p. 14; zXio Journal Official, 1878, p. 1186. sCf. also Aconomiste Franfais, December 14, 1878, p. 1466. ITALY AND THE TREATY OF 1 878 1 95 Accordingly on April 28, 1879, Italy addressed to the French government a communication' in which the belief was expressed that the treaty would not be ratified by the Italian parliament unless the allies should grant: 1. The right to issue 20 million francs in five-franc pieces during each of the years 1880, 1881, and 1882. 2. Release from the obligation, imposed by Art. 7, to retire and destroy within six months the whole of her notes of denomi- nations less than five francs. This complaint had been dictated by the banking and busi- ness interests in Italy, which had of late renewed the cry for more money. A firm reply was returned by France. The terms offered Italy were simply that, if Italy would withdraw the demand for more silver, France would consent to call a new con- ference, which should settle upon an act in place of the obnoxi- ous Art. 7, and which should provide means for preventing a second loss of the subsidiary coin. This was prefaced by a statement that Belgium, France, and Switzerland "werefirml}- resolved to maintain the principle of the suspension of the coinage of silver." ° The threat of Italy had, of course, been unsubstantial, and she was consequently obliged to content her- self with the offered terms. In her answer, she therefore gave a hesitating assent to the principle asserted by France. The French minister of foreign affairs, in a note addressed to the Due de Noailles on May 25, consequentl}- outlined the work of a new conference, and on June 21 the delegates of the five powers met once more at Paris. At first, Italy appeared to be bent upon obstructing the adoption of an agreement which would bind her to anything definite. 3 It was not long, however, before it became apparent that the allies were determined to settle the matters under debate"* in a way which would prevent further differences. A com- mittee, consisting of one French and one Italian delegate, was appointed to draw up a provisional agreement and, at the second ' Conference monelaire, loc. cit. ^Ibid., pp. 15 et seq. '^ Ibid., pp. 14-15. ''Ibid., Seance I. 1 96 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION official session (June 13, 1879), a report containing a plan for such an agreement was presented. The crux of the whole question was contained it Art. 5. This article was accordingly the first to be considered. It pro- vided that the " aggregate" circulation of Italian subsidiary coin, plus the circulation of notes of denominations less than five francs, should not exceed the sum of six francs per capita. Coin shipped to Italy by France must, therefore, be held in the Italian treasury until it should be convenient to use it for the redemp- tion of the small notes.' Italy desired to omit the second of these provisions and to change the wording of the first, substi- tuting a provision with the words " effective" instead of "aggre- gate," circulation.' The total coinage of Italian subsidiary silver had been 156 millions, while the issue of small notes was 113 millions. Of the 156 millions of coin, about 25 millions were at this time in the bank reserves, 25 millions in those of the state, 100 millions (estimated) in circulation in foreign countries, and six millions in circulation in Italy. Should Italy agree, it was urged, not to allow the coin and notes issued to exceed six francs per capita, injustice would be done, since, as long as the cours forcd of small notes continued, some of the small coin sup- posed to be in circulation would be driven into the bank reserves, etc. The term "effective" circulation was thus designed to afford a larger liberty in the issue of coin to meet the wants of trade. M. Say believed that this provision would be admissible, pro- vided : 1. That the returned coin be employed for no other object than the redemption of notes. 2. That this operation, once undertaken, be effected in a thorough way. 3 The article as thus modified was, therefore, adopted after some slight alterations had been further proposed and accepted. t Art. 7 was next taken up. It merely provided that the act should be substituted for Arts. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the Arrangement of November 5, 1878, in case Italy should prefer ■/iSzV., p. 24. ^ fdid., p. 2$. 3/6icl.,p.26. ■•/«(/., pp. 28-35. ITALY AND THE TREATY OF 1 878 IQ/ to accept its provisions rather than those of the agreement. This was a purely formal stipulation, and was intended to avoid any technical claim that the substitution of a new agreement, for certain provisions of an indivisible act would invalidate the act.' Hence the choice between the two instruments was left to Italy. ^ The remaining sections introduced no essential modifi- cations of the preceding arrangement. Thus, the effort of Italy to break away from the conservative policy of her allies had once more failed. We have already noted that a bill ratifying the treaty of 1878 had been well on its way toward becoming a law in France when the action in Italy had broken in upon the course of mone- tary events. This bill was now passed by the senate, and on July 30, 1879, it became a statute. 3 The Acte Addition7iel , whose evolution has just been traced, was ratified by a bill passed on the same date* Similar measures were passed by the other states. Thus, the "right of free coinage of silver" was definitely abrogated throughout the countries of the Latin Union. " Ibid., pp. 29-40. "Ibid., p. 44. 3 For text, see Bulletin de Statistique et de Legislation Comparee, 1879, 2, p. 70. * Ibid., p. 71. CHAPTER XVII. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE. It was clear that France had definitely broken with the silver policy and that she intended to force upon the Latin Union as a whole the acceptance of her own ideas. True, the Treaty of 1865 had expressly provided for the redemption of subsidiary silver, and it could not be said that, in demanding such redemption, France was in the least degree exceeding the authority allowed her by that agreement. But, while France had in no respect departed from the letter of the contract, it was quite plain that she fully intended, should the Latin Union break down, to hold the allied countries to an interpretation of the Treaty of 1865 which had not been expected. It is in the light of this already evident determination on the part of France that the events of the period from 1879 to 1885 must be interpreted. The period is not solely important because of the events by which it was characterized. Of these, the only ones of much interest were the Italian resumption and the Paris Conference of 1881; and even these do not belong generically to the history of the Latin Union. The striking feature of the period is the growth in France of the feeling that some definite steps toward marking out the future course of the Latin Union must be taken. The present chapter will be an attempt to study the progress of these ideas, as influenced by the monetary events of the time. After the ratification of the treaties of 1878 and 1879, the immediate step to be taken by France was the fulfillment of the agreement concerning the retirement and return of the Italian subsidiary coin. The treaty of 1878 had, as already mentioned, been ratified by the law of July 30, 1879,' and, by the supple- mentary act of the same date ratifying the Acte Additionnel,'' power was conferred upon the minister of finance "to come to ^ See Bulletin de Stalistique et de Legislation ComparSe, 1879, 2, p. 70, for text. ''Ibid., p. 71. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE IQQ an understanding with the Bank of France on the subject of the financial operations of the treasury, or such others as the execu- tion of the Acte Additiotmel will necessitate."' The necessary arrangements were consequently made. It was agreed that the operation should be conducted by the Bank of France, which, together with its branches, should receive the Italian subsidiary coin up to January 2, 1880, when their currenc}' should cease. After that date, the shipments were to be made to Italy, according to the treaty agreement, and the coin held in the meantime by the bank was to be transferred to a new account and held in reserve. It will be recalled that it had been estimated in the treaty that about 13.9 million francs in Italian subsidiary coin were in circulation in Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland, and that it had been arranged that this sum should be shipped to Ital}- during the first half of the month of January, 1880. The operation was carried on during the latter part of the year 1879, the coin being received and held by the Bank of France. Not much anxiety was shown by the general public at the decrease in cir- culation. The subsidiary silver had really become redundant, owing to the influx of the Italian coin. This, indeed, was remarked upon by M. Say,^ who, in a speech before the Senat during the discussion of the bill to ratify the new monetary treaty, pointed out the redundancy, and showed that, should there be any scarcity of coin after the return of the Italian money, it could easily be overcome, since France still had "a margin of nine million francs" before the exhaustion of the quotas allowed by preceding treaties. Besides this, the increase in population would justify an additional coinage of one million without danger of exceeding the six francs per capita agreed upon. 3 Moreover, a large sum of Italian subsidiary silver had ■ See Art. 2 of the act. ^ See London Mconomisi, 1879, August 2, p. 885. 3 He further suggested that France should now extend the operation of the treaty to Reunion Island, where Indian rupees had been circulating at an exaggerated value. About 6.5 millions of francs in subsidiary silveT .could be obtained by recoining the rupees. France still possessed about 1.5 million francs in old pontifical coin which she had been unable to return to Italy. M. Say proposed that these, together with the rupees, making eight millions of francs in all, should be recoined and issued in addition to the ten millions mentioned above. 200 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION already been received by the Bank of France and was forming a part of its silver reserve. In Belgium and Switzerland, too, the process was contempo- raneously carried on, but in none of the countries did the amount paid in equal the sums that had been expected. By the early part of January, 1880, the Belgian and Swiss contin- gents had been received, but they aggregated only about 8,058,654 francs. Greece sent in no coin. Inasmuch, however, as the treaty had mentioned the sum of 13 million francs as the first remittance,^ although under the supposition that these 13 millions would be no more than the equivalent of the coin circu- lating in the smaller states, a quantity of the coin collected in France was added, and, in the course of the month of January, 13,503,000 francs were shipped by the bank to the Italian gov- ernment.'' Returns now began to come in more rapidly, and it was found that everywhere the estimates had considerably exceeded the actual receipts. Stilly by the middle of April, so much had been collected that the bank considered it expedient to carry to a new account the Italian subsidiary money, there being then on hand about 65,818,089.80 francs. 3 The returns were all in by the end of May, and proved much smaller even than had been anticipated.* The actual amounts received were about as follows : Departments 2 francs I franc 50 centimes 20 centimes Total (Francs) France and Algeria . Paris 12,101,318 3,885,464 24,614,757 8,882,775 15,319,905 4,777,364 978,110 171,773 53,014,090 17,717,377 Total 15,986,782 33,497,532 20,097,269 1,149,883 70,731,467 300,000 In the Colonies .... In Belgium In Switzerland 1,380,096 260,538 2,955,033 587,265 2,112,097 651,288 54,187 58,150 6,501,413 1,157,241 Total 79,090,121s " See Art. 3 of Section i of the Acte Additionnel. Consult also Bulletin de Sta- tistique et de Legislation Comparie, 1879, 2, pp. 3, 4. 'Cf. London Economist, February 7, 1880, p. 151. '^ Ibid., 1880, p. 441. 'See Bulletin de Statistique et de Legislation Comparie, 1880, i, pp. J83, 384. Also London Economist, 1880, p. 77i- ilbid., 1880, I, pp. 383, 384. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE 201 One reason for the unexpected smallness of the sums with- drawn was doubtless the fact that many had forgotten, or had not understood, that the coins were to be retired so soon, and were left with considerable quantities of irredeemable subsidiary coin on hand. Some dissatisfaction was consequently expressed at the time the coins ceased to be current.' This, however, was without actual justification, inasmuch as notice had been given a sufficiently long time in advance to admit of all holders securing redemption. It will now be necessary to examine cursorily the outlines of the general monetary question in the countries of the Latin Union at the opening of this period. It will be remembered that, in our discussion of the period just prior to the convention of 1878, it was shown that the favorable situation and balance of trade which had led to a strong flow of gold into the vaults of the Bank of France, and thereby enabled it to terminate success- fully the forced circulation of its notes, had contributed to strengthen public feeling in favor of the gold standard. It was then pointed out that the bank's successful resumption in gold had much to do with the strong demand for the absolute and final suspension of silver coinage, not onlv in France, but in all the countries of the Latin Union as well. The years preceding the conference of 1878 had been years of recovery from the commercial panic of 1873. The stimulus which had been felt by trade and industry was, however, slightly weakened in intensity about the time of the conclusion of the treat)'. During 1879 and 1880, the general commercial situation was not such as to encourage waverers in their adherence to gold, and, as is usual in times of depression, some means of shirking obligations was sought. From 1874 to 1878, inclusive, the balance of trade in gold bullion and specie had been heavily in favor of France. The favorable balance was considerably less marked in 1878 than it had been during the years immediately preceding, but the falling off was not great enough, in view of the abundant gold reserve held by the Bank of France, to excite real alarm. It ^London Economist, January 3, 1880, p. to. 202 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION ■ was not until the year following that the course of events really changed, and a period of some depression set in throughout most of the European countries. In France the turning of the tide was indicated by a reaction in the course of the gold current Whereas in 1878 there had been an inflow of nearly 240 millions of francs more than was sent out of the country, there was, in the course of the year 1879, a net export of about 176 millions, while during the succeeding year France lost no less than 2 1 3 millions of francs in gold.' Toward the end of 1880, however, a temporary respite in the demand for gold for export was obtained. From September 23 to November 4, about 160 millions were with- drawn. So heavy a drain as this was naturally the cause of con- siderable alarm, and, as a result, the Bank of France was driven, after trying various expedients, to raise the rate of discount. This measure afforded immediate relief, and it was hoped that the recent difificulties would not be repeated. The hope was not immediately fulfilled. The movement of gold out of France had been due to a familiar combination of circumstances. Bad hani^ests in Europe, and particularly in France, had coincided with unusually good ones in the United States. The natural result was that France imported from America much larger quantities of cereals than before. On the other hand, the United States had not correspondingly enlarged its demand for French prod- ucts, and it was consequently necessary for France to settle the balance in gold. This metal was the more eagerly sought by the United States on account of the operations of the treasury and the anxiety over the successful maintenance of specie redemp- tion. The export of gold had not, however, been heavy enough to cause any well-founded anxiety over scarcity of gold in France. Gold, instead of being scarce, was abundant, as was appar- ent from the heavy net imports of gold into France from 1873 to 1878. As compared with these, the losses after the latter year had been insignificant. Great anxiety was, nevertheless, felt on account of the smallness of the bank's reserve. At first sight, such fears might seem groundless. According to the published ' Cf. Appendix to Fiyial Report of Royal Commission, etc., 1888, p. no. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE 203 reports the bank had usually a reserve of more than 2200 mil- lion francs. In point of fact, however, only a comparatively small portion of this large mass of coin consisted of gold. The larger part was made up chiefly of silver five-franc pieces. This had aroused the anxiety of the bank upon observing the draining away of gold. Only between 700 and 800 millions of gold were on hand in the bank reserve during 1880. The small- ness of this reserve was not, as already pointed out, due to any scarcity of gold in France. It had been caused solely by improper management on the part of the bank.' In the desire to avoid issuing notes, the paper circulation had been allowed to become inadequate. The notes were, at most times, nearly equal in amount to the specie reserve. This lack of paper naturally forced gold into use as a substitute, and the necessity of keep- ing so large an amount of it in constant circulation prevented it from accumulating in the reserve of the bank as heretofore ; while, on the other hand, silver, being unpopular on account of its unfitness for use as money, accumulated in unusual amounts in the vaults of the bank. It has already been stated that the rise in the rate of discount had afforded some relief. The partial cessation of the drain of gold was due quite as much to natural causes as to the artificial restraint imposed by a higher rate of interest. Better crop prospects would, in any event, have led to a partial stoppage of the exportation of gold. But the circumstances which had led to the withdrawal of gold were not appreciated bv the people. The attempt was made to work upon popular fears arising from the loss of gold by the bank, in order to gain a new hearing for the silver cause. This was rendered easier by a renewal of the gold exports. The relief gained by the bank had proved to be only temporary, and, during November, about 60 millions in gold were shipped to the United States. The fear of a scarcity of gold was rendered more intense when it was learned to what an extent France had purchased foreign stocks which must be paid for in gold.' These purchases included Austrian, Hungarian, ^ Stt J^conomiste Francais^ August 21, 1880, pp. 217 et seq. -iLconontiste Francais^ October 16, 1880, p. 465. 204 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Egyptian, Russian, and other stocks, so that gold was flowing out of France, not only to the United States, but also to many parts of Europe. The gold reserve which, in November 1879, had amounted to nearly 800 millions, and had sunk to 684 millions in October 1880, had now fallen even lower, and the prospect was for another fall, perhaps even to 400 or 500 millions, while the bank still refused to increase its issues of 50 and 100- franc notes. These conditions, and the fact that the balance of trade still continued heavily in favor of the United States,' furnished some foundation for the fears of a monetary crisis, and it was consequently suggested by bimetallists that fresh issues of silver be authorized as a means of warding off the danger. The unfavorable commercial situation, and the renewal of public anxiety, had led the more extreme bimetallic advocates to suppose that the opportunity was favorable for renewing the agitation for the rehabilitation of silver. Nevertheless, they could not help recognizing that there was little prospect of obtaining silver legislation from France individually. This ought to have put an end to the hope of obtaining any action whatever, but there were not lacking those who believed that international monetary action in favor of silver might yet be secured. M. de Soubeyran introduced the matter in the senate, asking the finance minister whether it would not be expedient to call an international conference to consider plans for the rehabilita- tion of silver. But, before proceeding to study the conference of 1 88 1, in which not only the states of the Latin Union, but also a number of other countries took part, it will be necessary to glance at the course of monetary events in the smaller countries of the Latin Union. Some account has already been given of the state of affairs in Italy. ^ Proposals for abolishing the cours forcS had for some time made but little headway. It was just as France was strug- gling with the adverse balance of trade and the bimetallic •^ Ibid., December 4, 1880, p. 705. "See chap, vi., etc. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE 20$ discontent at home that it began to be rumored that some steps toward resumption were to be taken by Italy. Italy had at last decided to redeem her notes. As early as 1879, the question had been attacked by the minister of finance,' but various delays had postponed action on the subject until the following autumn. Late in October 1880 it was announced ° that a new bill for the abolition of the cours forc^ was about to be brought up in the Italian parliament. This intensified the fears that had been entertained in Paris regarding the loss of gold. The report was soon confirmed. 3 On November 15, MM. Magliani and Micelli introduced a projet de loi.'' The plan was to float a new loan. The ministers believed it would be unwise to move slowly and rely on an annual surplus of receipts over expenditures. The many grave disorders induced by the cours forc^ created a neces- sity for immediate action. There would be needed a sum of 600 millions for redemption of the notes and 44 millions additional to be used in reimbursing the Banque Nationale for a loan it had made to the government. It was not until April 8, 1881, that the bill was finally passed. The design was to get 444 millions in gold and 200 millions in silver. In London and Paris, fears that this would be a severe strain upon the monetary supply of the world were expressed. At the same time events in Tunis had brought about a coolness between France and Italy. French banking houses had no wish to participate in the operations con- nected with the government loan. 5 This left but two groups of financiers available : one at London, the other a syndicate of Italian, German, Belgian, and Dutch banking houses. It was thought best to secure the concurrence of both groups in the large operation to be carried through, and an eniente cordiale was established between them.^ ' See Mesures Proposles pour t Abolition du Cours Force. "London Economist, October 23, t88o, p. 1235. ^Ibid., November 6, p. 1295. ^Bulletin de Statistique et de Legislation Cojnparee, December 1880. 5 ROZENRAAD, L'Emprunt Italien pour r Abolition du Cours Force, p. 8. ^Ibid., p. 9. 206 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION The quantity of rente to be placed in the hands of the syndi- cate was fixed at 729,749,000 lire at 88.5, payment to be made in silver or gold legally current in Italy, or in foreign coin at fixed rates. Delivery was to take place between August i, 1 881, and September 30, 1882. It was decided to issue 365 millions, or more than one half the loan, on July 13 and 14, at 90/ The issue was covered one and a half times, but the condition of the Paris market soon rendered it clear that the new rente could not long remain at a premium. Fears that 444 millions of gold could not be had were expressed in London. The continuance of the critical situation with reference to New York was the immediate cause of alarm, owing to the heavy balance due the United States. Bad harvests in England, due to the heavy rains and further withdrawals of gold in France, rendered the situa- tion still more serious. What was an additional cause of alarm, American exchange ruled high, and even displayed an upward tendency. Gold went from London and Paris to New York, and there was a general rise in the rate of discount in London, Paris, Brussels, Berlin, and Switzerland. The syndicate was forced to resort to the purchase of Russian gold at Berlin." Several millions were obtained in this way, and, the monetary crisis becoming more intense, the bank raised its rate to 5 per cent. This crushed speculative buying of all securities, and 20-franc pieces flowed into the bank. By November 17, the gold reserve had reached 627 millions, and at the same time better conditions began to prevail. The opportunity was improved by the syndicate, and, at the end of 1881, the Italian treasury had received about 174 millions. Just at this moment the monetary crisis at Paris became slightly more intense. By the beginning of February Italian rente had fellen to 83.50. It was not until March 2 that the bank felt able to reduce its rate to 3.5 per cent, the reserve having risen to 860 millions. On May 3 and 4, the remainder of the rente was placed upon the market, and, owing to the fact that a strong gold current now began to flow from New York to London, the syndicate felt so much encouraged 'IHd.,p. 10. 'Ibid., -p. 13. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE 2O7 that it undertook to deliver 491 millions in gold in place of the 444 millions originally agreed upon, this increase being, of course, compensated by a similar decrease in the amount of silver to be delivered. This, and the circumstance that, despite the Egyptian crisis, Italian rente continued firm, and even rose on June 10 to 90.50,' renewed public confidence. Several offers for the stock remaining were made, and it was finally sold to an international group of banking houses. France had furnished in all 66 millions of gold, and 70 millions of silver; America, 65 millions of gold; Russia, 25 millions; Germany, 65 millions; Austria, 38 millions ; Australia, Denmark, Switzerland, Belgium, and Spain, smaller sums. Thus the gold resumption of Italy was unworthy to cause alarm from the French standpoint. Nevertheless, it was strongly urged as an argument for the renewed coinage of silver. One feature of the Italian loan was of especial importance to the Latin Union as a whole. It indicated that Italy, which, in recent years, had been the greatest obstacle to the adoption of the gold policy, had now practically come over to the side of Belgium and Switzerland, definitely displaying a preference for gold by redeeming the notes in that metal. This was for the moment overlooked. The Italian loan helped rather than hindered the progress of bimetallism in France. In the other countries of the Latin Union, the bimetallic problem received compara- tively little attention during this period. In Belgium and Swit- zerland, public opinion continued to favor gold, and in the latter especially the increase in commerce and industry strengthened the desire for the complete demonetization of silver. The bimetallic question had not received as much attention in Greece as elsewhere. This was because Greece had for a long time been suffering from the cours force, and there was but little pros- pect of a return to specie payments of any sort. The various agreements between the bank and the government " had not ^ Ibid., p. 1 8. 'Those of June ig and November 7, 1877, January 20, May 18, September 16, 1878, and October 8, 1880. For convenient summaries of these see Conference mone- taire entre la Belgique, la France, etc., 1885, pp. 189-197. 208 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION increased the prospect of redemption. All this might have made it clear to the bimetallists that the minor states of the Latin Union felt no desire to recur to a bimetallic policy. Neverthe- less, they were not discouraged, and, as already stated, M. de Soubeyran brought up the subject of a monetary conference in the senate. The proposals of the bimetallists were strongly combated. Parieu, in particular, took up the task of opposing them. In a speech of April 7, in the senate, he undertook to set forth the true status of the monetary question.' Going back to the year 1803, he explained the operation of the act of that year down to 1865. He reviewed the working of the Latin monetary treaties and dis- cussed the great bimetallic struggle of the years 1 873-1 878. He tried to show that action in favor of silver could be expected neither from America nor from the other European states. Even should such action be obtained, it could not be to the advantage of France, but would be far more likely to be advantageous to the United States. Hence, nothing could be gained by France in taking part in such a conference. Still, the conference had been summoned. There was nothing now to do but to go on with it. The only safety would lie in extreme caution concern- ing the propositions to which France should commit herself. This speech was answered by M. Magnin, the bimetallic minister of finance. ° He attempted to justify the monetary policy which had been pursued by France and tried to show that the coinage of silver had only been suspended on account of the monetary action of Germany. If Germany and other countries could be induced to adopt a policy more favorable to silver, there would be an opportunity for France to revert to her former policy. He went on to show that already Germany was beginning to find the establishment of her new monetary system too great a burden, England was leaning away from her gold standard, the United States was anxious to take some steps in favor of silver, and '■See Journal Officiel, 1882, pp. 520, 600, 608; 3.\so, Journal des Economisles, 1881, i, 2, pp. 106-123. ^Journal Officiel, 1882, pp. 604-609. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE 209 many other countries would like to join in such a conference as was about to take place, for the purpose of raising the price of that metal. These statements were hardly justified by the outcome of the conference. Meeting in Paris from April 19 to July 8 it did little.' For the present purpose it is only necessary to note the attitude taken by the delegates from the countries of the Latin Union. This was absolutely opposed to the free coinage of sil- ver.^ Not so clear an opinion was expressed regarding the expe- diency of an international agreement for the purpose of extending and increasing the circulation of silver in limited amounts. Italy and France declared their readiness to take steps in this direc- tion, provided certain other of the more important European states would unite in pursuing the same policy ;^ but, as the obsta- cles to such an agreement between the states seemed insuperable, the declaration thus made was of little actual importance. For the present, it was clearly stated, nothing could be done. The delegates of the smaller states of the Latin Union'' were unwil- ling to disturb the staius quo. Certain of the French delegates. it is true, like Cernuschi, declared their readiness to return to a policy of national bimetallism, but these were extremists whose arguments received no attention. The International Conference of 1881 operated powerfully and immediately in depressing the influence of the bimetallists, and correspondingly stimulating that of the partisans of gold. The attitude of the smaller countries of the Latin Union had been unmistakable. Thus the conference had not only done nothing in the interest of silver, but it had made clear the fact that the bimetallic influence was once more on the wane.s Beside this, the chance circumstances which had combined to strengthen the cause of bimetallism were now disappearing as rapidly as they ^ See Procis-Verbaux^ Conference vionetaire Internationale^ Paris, 1 88 1. '^ See the formal statements made by the'various countries, ibid.^ vol. ii. pp. 33, 35, etc., and vol. ii. pp. 138, 172, etc. 3 See Ibid. ''Ibid., vol. i. pp. 131 et seq. ^ Economiste Francais, 1881, i. pp. 185 et seq., 217 et seq., and 249 et seq. 210 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION had made their appearance. Grain prospects were better and gold was once more coming into the Bank of France's reserve. During the latter part of 1881 and the first months of 1882, the rate of discount was maintained at a high point' — 5 per cent. — as a measure of prudence, but the heavy purchases of French stocks (which must be paid for in gold) by foreigners gave hope that before long things would once more be in a normal condi- tion. It was seen that after all the most dangerous feature of the situation was not the supposed scarcity of gold, but the immense quantities of silver on hand. There was no danger of an inability to get gold ; the only real danger was that of fallmg to a silver basis. The fear of becoming more and more bur- dened with silver was again strongly felt by the bank. In the latter part of 1 881, it refused to issue its notes in exchange for quantities of silver, and this action aroused much discussion.'' There was no means of forcing the bank to issue notes against its will, although it might be obliged to receive silver coin on deposit. In order to stimulate the inflow of gold, the bank finally resolved upon a somewhat more generous policy in issu- ing notes of medium denomination, and as a result of this policy, combined with the favorable circumstances already mentioned, the increase of the reserve at length became rapid. By the end of 1882, it could safely be said that the bank was the largest holder of gold in the world. Nearly looo millions of gold were on hand. 3 Crops were good, and it did not seem probable that more gold would go to America in payment for cereals. The advantageous position of the bank may be understood by a com- parison of its situation with that of some months previous. December 29, 1881, only 655 millions of gold were on hand, and, although this was much better than the state of affairs a year earlier, when the reserve contained but 564 millions of gold, it was by no means satisfactory. The increase of gold in the bank during i88i was 91 millions of francs, while during the following year it rose by 289 millions.'* ^ Ibid., 1882, p. 611 et seq. ^ Ibid., October 7, 1882, pp. 446. 'Ibid., August 6, 1881, p. 173 et seq. * Ibid., June 17, 1882, pp. 725 et seq. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION QF SILVER COINAGE 211 The time set for the expiration of the Latin Union was now drawing sufificiently near to make it the most important topic of monetary discussion. Special interest was felt in it on account of the threatening attitude of Italy. As already noted, the direct inference to be drawn from the resumption policy of Italy was the new intention of basing the monetary S3'stem on gold. This inference was more than justified by facts. Several different circumstances combined to show that Italy would no longer be subservient to the monetary policy of France. As early as February 22, 1881, the chambers, acting in accord with the gov- ernment, had voted " that after January i, 1886, that is to say, from the expiration of the monetary treaty of the Latin Union, silver coin bearing devices other than those of the kingdom shall no long-er pass current in Italy, and shall not even be received into the public treasuries."' This important decision, equivalent, if rigidly enforced, to a practical withdrawal from the Latin Union, attracted little attention at the time and seems to have passed unnoted among the important doings of Italy at this period. It was also ordered in the same law, which provided for the abolition of the cours forc^, that henceforward customs dues should be payable only in gold. The resolution to place Italy more nearly on the gold basis, by refusing the acceptance of all foreign silver coin after the expiration of the existing monetary treaty, was reaffirmed May 11, 1883, when the question what course of action should be pursued on the expiration of the monetary treaty was brought up by MM. Minghetti and Luz- zatti in the session of that date." A revolution in the bimetallic opinion of Italy seemed to have taken place. The press was violent in its attacks upon the double standard, and the success of the new loan stimulated a desire to introduce the gold stand- ard even before the expiration of the Latin Union. September 22, 1883, it was decreed that at least two thirds of the bank 'See Cernuschi ; Le Grand .Prods de P Union Latine, Vaxis, 1884, pp. 16 et seq.: also Marsault, Droit Francais de V Unification des Monnaies ei des Conventions mone- taires, Paris, 1881, p. 174 et seq. " See Cernuschi, op. cit. 212 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION reserves should consist of gold. Not more than one third should be held in silver.' This step came as near placing Italy upon a gold basis as was possible consistently with adherence to the existing monetary treaty. Italy even began to fear that she would be flooded with five-franc pieces, for some attempt was made by speculators to exchange these coins for quantities of Italy's new supply of gold. Moreover, as a natural result of the act prescribing the proportions of gold and silver in the specie reserve of the banks, Italian credit institutions were forced to refuse the deposit of silver in unlimited amounts in exchange for notes. Inasmuch as there was at least 300 million francs in Italian five-franc pieces circulating in France at the moment, it was not unjustly felt that the action of Italy was a practical violation of existing agreements. The Italian attitude naturally seemed ungrateful to France, since large quantities of Italian silver had been guaranteed an unimpeded circulation in France throughout the whole of the cours forc^j^ Thus, a seri- ous misunderstanding already existed within the Latin Union itself. At bottom, this difference, though thinly veiled by the minor subjects of dispute already mentioned, was to be attrib- uted to the clearly understood determination of France to demand redemption by the other states of their silver five-franc pieces in circulation within her territory. In view of the increas- ing depreciation of silver, this would be an expense of no small importance. 3 Belgium, like Italy, began to fear that redemption would be demanded by France, and although anxious to see the gold policy introduced, was not willing to undertake the redemption of her silver five-franc pieces. This position was evidently identical with that of Italy, which was now trying to exclude, so far as possible, the silver five-franc pieces, hoping that redemption would not be enforced, and that therefore, by keep- ing o.ut silver, she would ultimately be burdened with so much the less of it. France was quick to perceive the meaning of the attitude ' Ibid., p. II. 'London Economist, November 10, 1883, p. 1314. 3 For discussion of this subject see numbers of La Steele for this period. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE 213 adopted by her allies. Early in March 1884, her policy was at last formulated by M. Tirard who announced that the union would not be renewed, unless suitable provision should be made for liquidation.' This announcement, nevertheless, had appar- ently no effect on the determination of the smaller countries to persevere in adhering to the gold standard. It was plain that a tacit continuance of the Latin Union would not be tolerated. ° Either it must reorganized on a new basis, or it must cease to exist. In order to bring the matter to an issue, Switzerland at length gave notice, 3 in a document addressed to the French government, of her intention to terminate the league at the expiration of the present treaty. This was, of course, a formal- ity, and was designed merely to bring about a fresh meeting of delegates from the different states. Inasmuch as the time of the expiration of the treaty was now drawing so near, it was desirable to act immediately. The four smaller states were accordingly notified, and the time for the conference was set at October 21, 1884.'* For various reasons, however, the meeting was from time to time postponed, and it was not until July 29, 1885, that the delegates at last gathered at Paris. The period between the announcement of the new meeting and its actual occurrence was one of much debate in economic circles. The probability that the union would be abolished or, if renewed, would be renewed on such terms onl}- as would indicate a very radical alteration of policy, rendered speculation in regard to the possible outcome unusually active. The French and Italian societies of political economy debated the problems connected with the Latin Union with varying results. It was generally admitted that the Latin Union should be renewed, but that the coinage of silver five-franc pieces must continue suspended, and that provision must be made for redemption of those already in ^ Sq& Journal O^ciel, 1884, p. 647; ^n^ London Economist, March 8, 1884, p. 296. ^ Cf. Econoiniste Francais, March 29, 1884, p. 373 et seq, '^London Economist, June 14, 1884, p. 721 etc. ^ Aconomiste Francais, September 20, 1884, p. ;j63. 214 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION circulation. On the question whether, in legal strictness, the redemption of the silver five-franc pieces in gold could be demanded, opinion was sharply divided.' In France, however, it was felt that, whether legal or not, redemption would be no more than just and — what was of more importance — it could practically be exacted and enforced.'' On the other hand, there were some who saw no object to be gained in the redemption of silver five-franc pieces, and were anxious that France should set the example for the Latin Union by returning to the policy of national bimetallism. On April i8, 1885, M. de Soubeyran had addressed to the minister of finance an argument and demand for the resumption of the free coinage of the five-franc piece. There was, of course, no prospect of the adoption of such a measure and its presentation could hardly have been more than an attempt to vindicate the bimetallic principle. 3 The discussions of the time assisted considerably in clearing up public opinion on the monetary question. It became more and more evident that to refuse the redemption of the silver five-franc pieces would be impossible. Now that the first success of the redemption of the notes was over, Italy saw clearly that it would not be to her interest to provoke a disruption of the Latin Union, or to arouse any anxiety on the part of the Bank of France regarding the ultimate redemption of the large quantity of Italian silver in the vaults of that institution. With Greece and Switzerland there was little prospect of difference, but the more tractable attitude of Italy now began to be offset by an increasing hesitation on the part of Belgium to yield to the demands of France. It will be recalled to how great an extent interchange of coin had been taking place between Belgium and France, and especially how great a quantity of Belgian five-franc pieces had been carried into France. Thus, in case of redemption, the loss to be sustained by Belgium was likely to be very great. ' See Annates de la Socilti de V £,conomie Politique, 1884-5 ; also &conomiite Franfais, May 9, 1885, p. 583. ^ Aconomiste Franfais, June 27, 1885, p. 815. ^Ibid., April 18, 1885, p. 494; also Journal Officiel, 1885, pp. 315 and 448-450. THE PERIOD OF SUSPENSION OF SILVER COINAGE 21 5 Moreover, the demand for redemption was particularly offensive because, prior to the suspension of silver coinage, the Belgian mint had been used by speculators who effected coinages of silver there, after the closing of the other mints of the Union, and with the coin so obtained displaced gold in France. No profit had been derived from these speculative issues by Belgium. Consequently, it was argued, no loss upon them should be borne by the state. Even in Belgium, opinion was divided.' Never- theless it was certain that France would somehow be able to enforce the claim for redemption. Whether or not this would actually be done was now to be decided. 'See Aconomiste Franfais, July l8, 1885, pp. 67 et seq., pp. 221 et seq. Echo du Parlement^ 1885, August and September; also Moniteur des Interits Materiels, Brus- sels, for same period. CHAPTER XVIII. THE TREATY OF 1885. The treaty of 1885 is, for several reasons, an anomaly in the history of the Latin Union. As already many times noted, the discussion of the bimetallic problem had taken place outside the regular conferences rather than within them. The various gov- ernments had selected their policy, instructed their delegates, and the conference was a mere struggle to force the acceptance of certain conditions upon the league as a whole. In 1885, however, some of the difficulties in Italy had been overcome and sound finance was, for the most part, the rule throughout the union. Moreover, the overwhelming and con- tinued fall in the value of silver had set the question of the adoption of bimetallism at rest. These facts allowed, and even demanded, a closer attention to the monetary question, as distinct from the mere problem of the rehabilitation of silver. In addi- tion to this, the fact that such a rehabilitation was now out of the question, required special recognition. Besides, France was now determined to bring the question of redemption to an issue, and this determination, coinciding as it did with the improved financial and economic conditions, seems to have led the states to believe that the time was opportune for a definite declaration on the silver question. It was noted in a former chapter that the Treaty of 1878 may be regarded as a debate upon the monetary condition of Italy. It is similarly convenient to regard that of 1885 as a discussion of the relation of Belgium to the Latin Union as a whole. That is to say, the manner in which the question of redemption came up, threw the deliberations into the form of such a discussion. It goes without saying that the crucial point at issue was the question of redemption, and it is due to the fact that Belgium took the leading part in opposing 216 THE TREATY OF I885 21/ redemption that she became the most prominent figure in the convention. It will be recalled that, when discussing the treaty of 1865, the possibility of a dispute like that over the redemption of the five-franc piece was mentioned as a cardinal weakness of the treaty. As we have seen, the Treaty of 1865 did not adopt bimetallism. It continued the fundamental principle of the law of 1803. Of course, so long as this act affected in its opera- tion only a single country, there could be no outgrowth of problems connected with international redemption. But with the foundation of a league like the Latin Union, guaranteeing to its members mutual reception of one another's coins, it is clear that an entirely different issue was put. This issue was shirked by the Treaty of 1865, inasmuch as it copied the Act of 1803. Since, however, it established a ratio such as to ensure for the time being the maintenance of a gold standard of payments, the tacit assumption, even at that early date, was that, should redemp- tion take place, it should be effected in gold. This assumption amounted to an understanding. Furthermore, in taking it upon themselves at the Conference of 1878 not only to insist upon the redemption of the subsidiary coin according to treaty agreement, but also to demand the withdrawal of the notes and the ultimate substitution of coin therefor, the united countries had established a precedent that was of immense weight in 1885. Belgium was as active as any of the allies in forcing upon Italy the accept- ance of the new conditions, and demands were openly made for the redemption of the five-franc pieces ; nor was the right to such redemption anywhere disallowed. Belgium seems in 1878-9 to have forgotten her own situation with reference to France, and in her eagerness to bring Italy to the acceptance of the offered terms, she neglected the possibility of analogous French demands in the near future. At the opening of the Conference of 1885 there were five possible modes of procedure : I. To make no attempt at redemption but allow each country to retain the coin it possessed. 2l8 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION 2. To divide the aggregate amount of silver held by the union into five equal parts, assigning one part to each country for redemption. 3. To demonetize silver and throw the loss upon the holders of coin. 4. To assign each state for redemption a quota of coin proportioned to its population as compared with that of the Latin Union as a whole. 5. To require of each state the redemption of its own issues of coin. All of these modes of procedure were suggested in connec- tion with the debates of 1885, and all, therefore, demand con- sideration. To enjoin upon each country involved the necessity of retaining in its circulation the coin already on hand, without possibility of securing its redemption, would have thrown a mass of depreciated metal upon countries which had used every pre- caution to avoid the possibility of such an occurrence. It was clearly out of the question to attempt a policy of this sort. The second proposed method requires no discussion. It was clearly absurd, and it would have been impossible to enforce it by any peaceful means. Again, to demonetize silver, without providing for redemption, would have been merely a measure of repudia- tion that could on no grounds have been justified. No such measure would have been tolerated by the great credit institutions like the Bank of France, into whose treasuries the five-franc pieces had been forced in large quantities by public dislike. The fourth and fifth ways of resolving the difficulty were the only feasible policies and involved the whole question at issue, the difference being merely that between requiring each country to bear the consequences of its own acts and demanding that the burden be divided proportionally between the several states. Should the Latin Union act as a homogeneous body and dis- tribute the burden of redemption equally upon all the members of its population, or should it rather act as a complex of national units and demand that each country be responsible for its own coinages ? This, briefly, was the whole of the problem. It may THE TREATY OF 1 88 5 2ig seem, at first sight, quite plausible that the burden should be evenly distributed thoughout the states involved. Closer inves- tigation, however, shows that this mode of redemption would have been palpably unjust. The Latin Union had always been of a negative rather than of a positive nature. It had been merely regulative. It had simply provided for a uniform fine- ness and weight of the coins of the different countries, but had not even prohibited issues of paper or prescribed rules for the government of bank issues, nor had it ever dictated the amount of coin which should be issued. The limitation of the coinage of silver had been merely intended as a means of protecting the members of the union from one another's overissues. Inasmuch as coinage had been left to the will of the individual states, it was clearly just that they should individually redeem the coin they had issued. It will be recalled that, as explained in an earlier chapter, Switzerland had little to lose, no matter what the decision of the union upon the question of redemption might be. On the other hand, other reasons than those arising from her relation to the allied countries compelled Italy to look forward to the proba- bility of an ultimate redemption of her silver. At the same time, Belgium was the heaviest holder of French silver, while the for- eign silver held by France was largely Belgian. All this explains why Belgium was practically placed alone in an attitude of determined opposition to France. Inasmuch as Belgium was unwilling to accept the duty of redeeming her coin, there was nothing left for her but to advo- cate the maintenance of the status quo, with retention of the present holdings of silver by each country concerned. This policy was mainly supported by M. Pirmez, the chief of the Bel- gian delegation. At the third session of the conference, July 23, 1884, he opened the debate upon the much vexed question of redemption a propos of Art. i 5 of the preliminary treaty-draft prepared by a committee to whom this work had been intrusted as a means of bringing up in regular order the various problems to be discussed. 220 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION In general his presentation of the case against redemption rested on a few fundamental contentions. M. Pirmez argued ' that since the Act of 1865 had made no provision for redemption of the coins of one metal in the coins of the other it was, there- fore, no more right to demand redemption of silver in gold than the reverse. He elaborately reviewed the history of the Latin Union, and sought to show that nothing yet done by the Latin Union as a whole, with reference to redemption by countries other than Belgium, could be regarded as applicable to the ques- tion what policy should be pursued toward Belgium. He urged that the coinage had been a mere industrial process, imposing no obligation upon the government save that of accu- rately ascertaining the weight of the coin stamped, and involving no responsibility of ultimate redemption.' He concurred with Cernuschi in declaring that " metallic money is automatic in its issue. The limit of issue is fixed by no one." 3 Wherever it was cheapest and most convenient, there, he maintained, coin- age might most advantageously be carried on by any nation. But, in this instance, the nation that effected the coinage must, by the nature of the case, be absolved from any responsibility as to the future value of the coin. This, briefly, was the presentation of the case for Belgium. M. Pirmez demanded that, for the present, things should remain in statu quo. The Latin Union had , been a highly beneficial organization. To disrupt it would be productive of great incon- venience ; and disruption, he argued, would be the consequence of insistence upon the liquidation clause. An outlet for the five- franc pieces would soon be provided in Italy by the withdrawal of 350 millions of small notes there. Moreover, an ultimate return to "pure bimetallism" was hinted at. To all these contentions replies were made by the opposing speakers. An Italian delegate showed'* that M. Pirmez con- fused past and present conditions. Whatever the Latin Union ' Confirence monHaire entre la Belgique, la France, PItalie, la Grice, et la Suisse, Procis-Verbaux, 1885, pp. 314 et seq. 'Ibid., p. 45. '^Ibid. •■Ibid., pp. 50 et seq. THE TREATY OF 1 885 221 might have been in its inception, it certainly no longer pre- served a bimetallic character. The transformation had for years been an accomplished fact. It was now no more appropriate to argue from the treaty of 1865 than from the law of 1803 itself. The enactments of 1865 had been superseded by the later decisions of the Latin Union. Exchange was now based on gold, and transactions were carried on by reference to that metal. The union was no longer in any sense a bimetallic organization. Nor was it difficult in investigating the history of the Latin Union to find fully as many instances of expressions tending to invalidate, as of those tending to sustain, the statement that bimetallism had been abandoned only temporarily. ' It was clearly shown that, on many different occasions, France had plainly declared her intention of demanding redemp- tion by the several states.^ The argument of the irresponsibility of Belgium with refer- ence to her issues of coin was either flatly denied or passed over in silence, but it was shown that the issues of silver five-franc pieces since the real beginning of the fall in the value of silver ( 1 867) had exceeded those antedating that event by 205 millions, or 40 per cent, of the total. 3 It was therefore urged that as Belgium could never refuse to accept these coins — now aggre- gating so large an amount — from her citizens, and since these latter would be obliged to accept them in payment of debts due them abroad, it would be well to allow the insertion of the clause providing for redemption instead of forcing on a crisis, with the possibility of destroying the union. Should the omission of the clause be insisted upon, the very thing that was to be appre- hended — the almost immediate payment of a large balance — would be directly brought about. On the other hand, by admit- ting the stipulation among the provisions of the treaty, Belgium, would in all probability, meet with no trouble in continuing her coinage system upon the old basis, and the redemption period ■ Ibid., pp. 63-65. ''See Procis-Verbaux for the Conference of 1878, pp. 30-32, 46, 56, and 66. ^ Proc^s-Verbaux, 1885, ante cit., p. 59. 222 , HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION would be SO extended, and the conditions for it so modified, that no further difficulty would be encountered. This point of view was presented in an especially forcible way by M. Lardy, a Swiss delegate, who ridiculed M. Pirmez' remarks on the consistency of the policy pursued by Belgium in keeping her mints open to silver. There existed no natural right to the free coinage of silver. Moreover, the statement of the Belgian representative, that it was inopportune to raise the ques- tion of liquidation, since it was generally desired to continue the union, reflected upon Begium herself, for it was her own attitude which had at this particular moment forced the question to the front. M. Ellena, the Italian representative, expressed much the same opinion.' The contention of M. Pirmez, concerning the irresponsibility of the government, he regarded as a mere quib- ble;'^ and he showed that, inasmuch as redemption in some form could not be avoided, it was much to Belgium's interest that she admit the liquidation clause in a formal way. These arguments found little favor with the Belgian dele- gates. The same charges and demands that they had made on former occasions were repeated. After two days of debate it was found necessary to close the discussion. In summing up, M. Duclerc, the president, attempted to justify the demands of France and to show that their acceptance was a necessity. France, said he, had, throughout a period of years, displayed great consideration for the desires and wishes of the other countries, and had not allowed herself to be hindered by the demands of self-interest from doing justice. 3 Only by virtue of special enactments had the five-franc pieces been able to circu- late. It was largely owing to the efforts of France that their value had been maintained. France was the heaviest holder of them, and as such, her demands were entitled to the greatest consideration. M. Duclerc then laid before the delegates the formal demands of France. These must be accepted before France could consent to a renewal of the league upon any terms.* ■ Ibid., p. 76. - Ibid., p. 78. 3 Cf. ibid., p. 83-85. * Ibid., p. 85. THE TREATY OF I885 223 The first and primary demand was, of course, a straightfor- ward agreement on the part of each country to accept the obli- gation of redeeming the fivg-franc pieces. But France went much farther even than this. She undertook to dictate the method and time of redemption. Within a year from the expiration of the proposed treaty the several countries were to have mutually exchanged the foreign coins they each held, and for the purpose of properly conducting this operation regular books were to be opened at specified places, the expense of returning the coin to be charged to the state making the shipment. Secondly, by October i, of the year following the expiration of the treat}-, all foreign coin, of whatever description, circulating within the limits of each state was to be withdrawn by that state and to be deprived of its legal-tender quality. After October i, silver coins were no longer to be received in international payments. By January 25, next following, account of the balances of foreign coin yet held in the various treasuries was to be ren- dered, and debtor states were, as soon as possible thereafter, to begin the redemption of their coin, paying for it in gold or bills of exchange at quarterly intervals, over a period not to exceed two years in length. Interest at the rate of 1.5 per cent, was also to be paid upon the unsettled balances. To this series of demands M. Pirmez declined to make further reply. He referred the whole matter to the Belgian govern- ment, and at the next session presented, as his ultimatum, a protest against the ideas expressed bv the representatives of the other allied countries and a refusal to accede to the demands of France.' He further requested that the existing condition of things might be continued for one year, in order that time might be afforded for a consideration of the situation, hinting that per- haps by the expiration of that time Belgium might see the way clear to concessions. The smaller states, however, joined readily with France, ° in refusing to yield to Belgium's wish for a longer continuance of the treaty of 1878, nor did the renewed demand for the omission of the liquidation clause find more favor. ' Ibid., pp. 89-93. ° Ibid., pp. 94-96. ' 224 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Inasmuch as it was now perfectly clear that the original demands could not be admitted to consideration, it was decided by Belgium to attempt to secure thei^r acceptance in a modified form.' The Belgian delegates offered to sign a treaty, providing that, in case of a dissolution of the union, no obstacles should be placed in the way of a return of the five-franc pieces through the usual commercial methods of exchange by any of the con- tracting states. Not even this agreement, however, met the wishes of France. The determined and Jong-continued opposition now provoked M. Pirmez to abandon his former moderation of expression. He declared that his country had reason to regard itself as "the victim of the Latin Union," ^ and announced his intention of withdrawing from the deliberations. At the next meeting, neither he nor his colleagues appeared, and it was evident that the new treaty must be concluded without the concurrence of Belgium. It was therefore decided to formulate a provisional arrangement and to adjourn temporarily, in order to afford time for some sort of conciliation. But, before proceeding to study the terms of the new treaty, it will be necessary to consider the debates on some of the important points involved. Aside from the question of liquidation, the principal problem to be considered was that of the proposed retirement of some of the silver five-franc pieces. It was, besides, desired by many that the Italian five-franc notes should be retired. This was based upon the consideration which dictated a retirement of some of the silver five-franc pieces. The policy which seemed most expedient was thus outlined by the Swiss delegates : 1. Maintenance of the suspension of silver coinage ; 2. Sale of silver coin ; 3. Retirement of Italian five-franc notes. ^ It was thought that the retirement of 340 millions of five-franc notes in Italy would create a monetary vacuum into which, it was not unreasonably hoped, some of the five-franc pieces would '^ Ibid., pp. 100-105. ''Ibid., p. 104. ^ Ibid., p. 16. THE TREATY OF 1 885 225 rush, thus tending to relieve the pressure in other parts of the union. There was yet another problem connected with the vexed question of the management of the silver five-franc pieces : it was that of the quotas of subsidiary coin. In many parts of Switzerland, it was felt that a quota averaging 20 francs per capita instead of the present six francs would be more nearly correspondent to the needs of the population.' Switzerland com- plained bitterly of the superabundance of five-franc pieces, and the scarcity of small coin from which she was suffering,^ and Italy was no less anxious that her own quota should be enlarged by at least from 8 to 12 millions, on account of her increased population. 3 It will now be necessary to examine carefully the draft of the new treaty as finally drawn up without the concurrence of Belgium, prior to adjournment ; and to which it was intended to force Belgium's assent, should she again desire to become a member of the Latin Union. By the preamble of the new act'' it was explained that the necessity of modifying and complet- ing the old treaty had determined the powers to conclude an altogether new one. Art. i constituted the powers a union, as in 1865. Art. 2 specified the gold coins to be struck, on essentially the same conditions as in former years. Notwith- standing the fact that it had been decided not to allow the further coinage of the gold five-franc pieces, that coin was never- theless retained in the list, but by Sec. i of Art. 8 its coinage was prohibited. So, likewise, Art. 3 regulated the conditions of the coinage of silver five-franc pieces, but, by the second section of Art. 8, their coinage also was prohibited, although it was specified that any state might, upon redeeming on demand such of its coins as were held by the other states, resume the coinage of silver five-franc pieces. Switzerland, however, was permitted to recoin her old issues. Art. 3 furthermore practically reduced the silver five-franc piece to the condition of a subsidiary coin. It provided for its ^ Ibid., p. 22. 'Ibid., pp. 22-25. ^ Ibid., p. 25. ^ See Appendix I. 226 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION redemption when reduced helow a certain weight, and guaran- teed its reception into the Bank of France during such time as the treaty should continue to possess its binding force. Art. 4 prescribed much the same regulations as formerly for the sub- sidiary coin, but by Art. 9 the quotas were somewhat raised. France was allowed 256 millions, Greece 25, Italy 182, and Switzerland ig millions, with extra quotas of 20 millions for Italy, eight millions for France, and six millions for Switzerland, for recoinage purposes. The provisions of the old treaty regard- ing redemption, legal-tender quality, etc., of the subsidiary coins, remained essentially unaltered. The terms of admission to the union were maintained as before. By Art. 10, France undertook the work of carrying on a general bureau of information on monetary subjects of interest to the allied states. Art. 13 provided that the duration of the treaty should be from January i, 1886, to January i, 1891. Art. 14 contained the most important provision of the treaty. It stipulated that, in case of the renunciation of the treaty, the several contracting powers should redeem their silver five-franc pieces. So many questions as to when and how this provision was to be fulfilled had arisen, that it was held expedient to devote a special instrument to its elucidation.' The treaty proper was therefore succeeded by an Arrangement Relatif. This important document has never yet been called into operation, but it has lost none of its binding force, and may at any time be rendered effective. It is the heavy responsibilities forced by this document upon the smaller states that now bind them so strongly to France. It first provided that an exchange of five-franc pieces, so far as they were held in equal amounts by the several states, should be effected during the year succeeding the expiration of the treaty. For the conduct of this operation books were to be opened at certain specified places. It was provided that the five- franc pieces were all to be withdrawn before October i of the year following the expiration, while, by January 15 immediately ' See Appendix I. THE TREATY OF 1 88 5 227 following, the accounts were to be audited, and each state informed of the balance of five-franc pieces held at its -disposal, if any. Art. 4 specified the ways and means of payment. Gold bills of exchange on the creditor state, silver five-franc pieces of that state, or bank notes there having legal circulation, might be offered in payment. Payments were to be made quarterl}', during an unspecified number of years, until the account was settled, but any or all of these payments might be anticipated. Interest from January 15 was also to be added. For Switzerland, however, special provisions were made. These were intended to meet the difficulty that, as Switzerland had issued so little coin of her own, the retirement of the French and Italian five-franc pieces, which constituted so large a part of the actual circulation, would lead to a serious scarcity of coin.' It was arranged that the French and Greek five-franc pieces, retired in Switzerland, should be shipped direct to the French government, which was to make payment at sight either in Swiss silver five-franc pieces or in gold ten-franc pieces, provided only that the amount of each shipment should not be less than one, nor more than ten, millions of francs, nor should the total amount to be paid in gold exceed the sum of 60 million francs. With reference to Italy, it was agreed that redemption of her coin circulating in Switzerland should be effected in the same manner, save that Italy might, at will, make use of sight bills on the financial centers of Switzerland to the amount of each ship- ment ; none of the shipments to exceed two millions, or fall below 500,000 francs. The total sum to be paid by Italy was not to exceed 20 millions in gold and silver, and 10 millions in bills. So far the attempt to reach an agreement had failed. For, unless some accommodation with Belgium were arrived at before the end of the year, the result would be practical disruption of the eague. Although France and her allies had set themselves to effect a reorganization, it was improbable that, without Belgium, the league would meet even with the measure of success it had ' See Procis-Verbaux, 1885, loc. cit., pp. 127 et. seq. 228 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION SO far enjoyed. It may very naturally be asked why Belgium should have desired to break up the league since, as has been shown, it was unavoidable that redemption, in some form, should be effected by her. To this query it is impossible to give a defi- nite reply. It seems, however, as if Belgium's desire for a gold standard, which had always been strong, had induced her to adopt the policy which she pursued, in order to afford an oppor- tunity for leaving the union and reorganizing her monetary sys- tem on the gold basis.' There could, in fact, be no doubt that all the smaller countries were anxious to see the single gold standard introduced. In the question of redemption France was by far more deeply interested than any of her allies, inasmuch as she was the only very heavy holder of foreign coin. And as France had so far been able to maintain the silver five-franc pieces at par, and since it would be an expensive process to retire the large amounts of these coins that she had struck, she was not particularly anxious to accede to the wishes of the smaller countries regarding the pure gold standard. Of the allies Bel- gium was, financially and industrially, by far the strongest. It was possibly owing to the wishes of some of her statesmen, who were anxious to see the gold standard introduced and who had no fears of the consequences which might result from a break with the union, that Belgium had adopted her present policy, partly, no doubt, in the belief that it would be easier to redeem her coin when returned by the ordinary processes of exchange ; but chiefly, it seems likely, on account of her desire to grasp the opportunity for breaking with the Latin Union. It must not be understood from this statement that Belgian statesmen and publicists were agreed upon this course of action. As will later be seen, such was by no means the case. It was, however, believed by very many that the injury to which Bel- gium would thus be subjected would be no more than she could endure, and that it would be well worth while to incur these dangers for the sake of passing definitely to the regime of the single standard. 'See Aconomiste Franfais, 1885, 2, pp. 221 et. seq. THE TREATY OF 1 885 229 In the meantime, the controversy was carried on both in the press and the legislative assemblies. As early as July i6, the Paris DSats had published an article^ in which it was announced that France would demand the insertion of the clause of liquida- tion, and it was confidently predicted that the economic and financial interests of Belgium would be sufficiently powerful to prevent her from breaking with France. This was also the belief of many Belgian journals, although it was pointed out by these latter that, in case matters should really come to a breach, the Bank of France would find itself saddled with all the Bel- gian coin which had collected there and would encounter no little difficulty in forcing it back upon Belgium.' The English press was frequently favorable to Belgium's position. A letter to the London Economist^ brought forward the old argument that Belgium had been used as a coining agency by the other powers for their own purposes and consequently should not be taxed with the loss on the coin. These arguments were answered by M. Chailley,* who main- tained that it was absurd to suppose that Belgium had in any way been called upon to coin money for French needs. The fact that more easy conditions had been offered at Brussels than elsewhere was Belgium's own fault. It was during this discus- sion that the question came up in the Belgian Chambre des Repr^sentants. On August ii,the Belgian delegates to the mone- tary conference undertook to explain to the chamber their action in withdrawing from the deliberations. The explanations were not new nor did they prove very satisfactory, 5 and the stereotyped line of argument employed was already beginning to lose weight. It was calculated that considerabh- over 600 million francs in Belgian five-franc pieces were held in France, and it was feared that, as soon as the treatv of 1878 should come to an end, the French government, feeling the necessity of some action in • See the Paris Debais for July l6, 1885. ' See London Economist, 1885, p. 96. ^Ibid, 1885, p. 910. •* Journal des Economistes, 1885, ii. I, p. 253 elseq. 5 Cf. London Economist, 18S5, p. 1024. 230 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION order to protect the holders of the coins from the loss arising from depreciation, would collect the five-franc pieces and, after depositing them in the Bank of Belgium, draw bills of exchange thereon, which the bank would have to dispose of. Although it was said by some, in order to allay these fears, that the bank could thereupon pay these bills in silver, thus simply returning the coin, it was perfectly clear that no such way of getting out of the difficulty would be feasible. However, it was still hoped that an accommodation might be reached, and some signs of weakening were discernible among French publicists. In a long article in the Economiste Frangais,^ M. Leroy-Beaulieu admitted that, from the strict point of view of pure monetary theory, the contention of Belgium that the five-franc pieces ought not to be redeemed was probably correct ; but he argued that practically it was necessary, as well as in accord with recognized monetary precedents, that Belgium should effect the desired redemption. The persistence of France in the determination to enforce redemption now led to apparent concession on the part of the Belgian government. On September 19, telegrams were even received in Paris to the effect that M. Beernaert, the Belgian minister of finance, had indicated a willingness to accept the liquidation clause, on condition that the union should be con- tinued up to 1895.° ^- Pirmez himself admitted "that the termination of the union would give rise to serious difficulties." 3 No official communications, however, were published and, as it drew near the time for the next meeting of the delegates, it seemed probable that the Belgian delegates would again absent them- selves from the meeting. In order to be able to state with some approach to exactness the extent to which she was a holder of foreign coin, France determined to carry out an investigation of the facts of her circulation after the methods of the similar investigations of i^ '■ liconomiste Franfais, August 22, 1885, 2, pp. 221 et seq, ^ hconomiste Frani^aist 1885, 2, p. 361. This information was not official. ^London Economist, 1885, p. 999. THE TREATY OF IS85 23I and 1878. The result showed that, of the total silver circulation, about 12.5 per cent, was Belgian, while the percentage of Italian silver was even larger (about 15.3 per cent.'), and although the proportion was slightly less than in 1878, it was still large enough to be of very great consequence. This result rendered France the more anxious that her rights should be protected. On October 2 1 , the day before the conference was to assemble, the Belgian government finally addressed to the French gov- ernment a new proposal. It was of an ambiguous character and merely provided that " the state which shall withdraw from the union shall bear, so far as concerns it, the expense of liquidation, on the conditions prescribed by France."^ To this, the reply was returned that "the Government of the Republic does not regard the proposal thus formulated as acceptable, but it will nevertheless not fail to present it to the Conference." 3 On the following day, the conference once more addressed itself to the task before it. Several subjects still remained to be discussed, among the most important being the question of guaranteeing the legal-tender quality of the issues of five-franc pieces and assuring their reception by the credit institution and others. In the preceding meetings, a debate had arisen upon this point, France desiring to stipulate that, in case the legal- tender quality should be taken from the five-franc piece by Italy or Switzerland, during the life of the engagement undertaken by the bank, this engagement should lapse ; it being understood that the treaty should continue, provided a satisfactory substitute should be offered for the legal tender quality and unanimously agreed to by all the other powers. Italy, on the contrary, was anxious to eliminate some of these provisions. She desired a provision to the effect that, if the banks of issue of Italy and Switzerland should agree to receive the five-franc pieces, the Bank of France should likewise be held to the same obli- gation. France was not disposed to insist upon any of these points, ^Bulletin de Statistiqiie et de Legislation ComJ^aree, 1 885, 2, pp. 163—188. ' Proch-Verbaux, 1SS5, a«/^ «'/., p. 179. ^Ibid. 232 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION and the Italian representatives were satisfied, by the conces- sion of their demands, and the provision that, two months before the expiration of the treaty, notice should be given by the Bank of France, if it intended to discontinue its relations with' the union. If no such notice should be given, its obligations would be tacitly renewed, and the verbal assurance that this would be the case was given. The terms upon which free coinage might be resumed were also discussed at considerable length. As matters now stood, no power could resume free coinage without the consent of the others ; and, while it was wholly improbable that free coinage would again be permitted, nevertheless it was desired by France that this provision should be modified. Furthermore, Greece and Switzerland were allowed, by a declaration annexed to the treaty, some latitude beyond the treaty provisions. This instru- ment stipulated that free coinage should not be resumed in Greece during the cours forc^, but might be so after resumption had taken place, provided that an understanding with France and Italy were first reached. The document also subordinated the operation of Art. 12 of the treaty, which regulated the status of foreign coin, to the Swiss banking legislation. Also, the obligations of the Bank of France were explained by two letters which were annexed to the treaty and really formed a part of it. The proposition which had been made by Belgium on Octo- ber 21, and which we characterized as ambiguous, had been explained, at the request of the representatives, by a letter of the Belgian government dated October 23. Under this new light it had been discussed^ and found to differ little in principle from the earlier propositions. It had, therefore, been rejected and in order to define the relations of the union to Belgium, a protocol was added to the treaty in which the situation was explained. By this document, it was agreed that, in case of Bel- gium's non-adherence to the treaty, three months should be the maximum time during which the Belgian five-franc pieces could ^ Procis-Verbaux, 1885, ante cit., pp. 200 et seq. THE TREATY OF I8S5 233 be received into the public treasuries and banks of issue in the other states ; while, should any arrangement for redemption be made with the Belgian government by any of the allied go\'ern- ments, this arrangement must be submitted to the other countries for approval. After three months, the Belgian five-franc pieces would be subject to the operation of the second section of Art. 12, which shut out coins of all countries foreign to the union from the banks and treasuries. It is needless to sav that these provisions were practically dictated by France. It now remained to see what would be the answer of Belgium to this declaration of monetary war. The treaty and accom- panying documents were at once sent by France to the Belgian ministry.' On receipt of this communication Belgium replied by sending i\I. Pirmez again to Paris to attempt to arrive at an understanding.^ The treaty had been signed on November 6. On the 15th, it was announced to the members, who were still waiting in Paris for the purpose of debating the treat\- with the Belgian envoy, that the latter preferred not to enter the confer- ence again. 3 M. Pirmez had, in fact, understanding that France was his real opponent, wisely indicated a desire to treat with the finance minister privately. The conference, therefore, broke up, and for nearly a month longer the arguments were renewed between Belgium and France as representative and arbiter of the league. The necessity of mutual concessions was felt and on the I2th of the succeeding month — December — an Acfe Additioimcl was signed at Paris by representatives of all the powers. France met Belgium half-way. By Art. 4 of the Act, it was agreed that in case of a dissolution of the union, should France find herself the holder of a balance of Belgian five-franc pieces, one half of this balance should be directly redeemed by Belgium on the same conditions of redemption as had been applied in the case of the powers, while the remain- ing half should be returned by France through the usual chan- nels of exchange, Belgium agreeing, for the space of five years, to pass no law which would inure to the disadvantage of this '/diiW., p. 2Sq. 234 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION arrangement.' It was also agreed that in case Belgium should be the creditor state, she should have the benefit of the same dispo- sitions as had now been exacted from her by France, and it was further guaranteed by Belgium that the balance due should not exceed the sum of two million francs and that, in case of an excess above this sum, such excess should be directly redeemed. In order to leave no room for ill-feeling, the same arrange- ment was, by Art. 5, extended to Italy and, by a Declaration, to Greece as well. In the case of Switzerland, Belgium was to liquidate the whole balance directly, up to the sum of six million francs, and it was specified that in all cases the national Bank of Belgium should receive the five-franc pieces of the allied countries on conditions identical with those upon which they received the Belgian. Further, the Belgian quota of fractional coin was fixed at 35.8 millions, besides a possible sum of five mil- lions to be obtained by recoinage of old five-franc pieces. On the day when the treaty as thus amended was signed, the projet de lot" for its ratification was brought up in the French Chamber of Deputies. 3 By December 29, it had been referred, reported upon, debated, and had become a law. A decree of the 30th "t ordered its promulgation. By vote of the parliament and a royal decree dated Decem- ber 30, a similar measure was passed in Belgium. ^ The same law also contained clauses regulating the payment of debts in francs, and abrogating the law of March 31, 1879. Analogous acts were quickly carried through the legislative assemblies in Italy, Switzerland,' and Greece. Thus Belgium again passed ' For original text of act see Bulletin de Statistique et de Legislation ComparSe, 1885, 2, p. 650; also Appendix I. ^See Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit., 1886, I, p. 1. ^Documents Parlementaires, 1885, No. 219. * Journal Officiel, December 31, 1885. ■ "Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit., 1886, I, p. 172. *In Switzerland the act was not passed without some discussion. This was largely the work of a few members. The bill finally passed the Nationalrath on the 19th, and the Standerath, by a unanimous vote, on December 21. (See Burckhardt- BISCHOFF, Die Lateinische Milnzkonvention, u. s. w., 1886, p. 60.) THE TREATY OF 1 885 235 under the domination of France and the Latin Union. Many writers have stigmatized the treaty of 1885 as unjust to Belgium.' Such a view hardly seems warrantable. Nor would it be more accurate to justify the provisions of the treaty on the ground that Belgium had realized large sums from her silver coinage. ° The arguments of Haupt, Allard, and others against Belgium, while often ingenious, are for the most part fallacious. It must not be supposed that Belgium had been wilfully more derelict than her allies, or that she had allowed a larger coinage for the sake of a greater profit. But, here as elsewhere, it was neces- sary to regard ignorance or imprudence as no excuse for economic errors. It was impossible that Belgium should evade the consequences of mistakes already made, and it must be admitted that, in forcing upon Belgium the treaty of 1885, France adopted a course which finds full economic justification. Undoubtedly there was some support for the standpoint taken by Belgium, if viewed as a question of pure monetary theory. Practicall}', however, it was beyond question true that, as France contended, each country ought to redeem its coin, in order primarily to relieve innocent holders of the loss which would arise from depreciation. 3 Now that definite provision had been made for the future much of the uneasiness previously felt could be set at rest. ' See especially Bamberger, Die Schicksah der Lateinischen Miinzbundes. ' See a letter by O. Haopt, London Economist, 18S5, pp. 1320 et seg. Belgium had realized profit only since the introduction of the quota system. The other countries had done the same. Moreover, the amount so coined was small. The charge, there- fore, had little force. 3Cf. BURCKHARDT-BISCHOFF, in Die Lateinische Miinzkonvention, u. s. w., p. 53. "Die entgegenstehenden Standpunkte in Bezug auf die Liquidationsclausel haben beide ihre Berechtigung, und im Entscheid vom reinen rechtlichen Gesichts- punkt ware sicher schwierig zu fallen, u. s. w." CHAPTER XIX. THE PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION AND THE CON- FERENCE OF 1893. The ratification of the treaty of 1885 really meant the abro- gation of the Latin Union and the substitution of a new mone- tary league in its place. The different countries now found themselves bound to a policy of gold redemption, both externally and internally, and it was unlikely that the promise thus mutually given by the treaty of 1885 would be rendered obsolete by any general international agreement to coin silver, either freely or in specified large quantities. It was seen that a definite under- standing of the position of the Latin Union was needed, and the treaty of 1885 was very favorably received. It placed the union on a new and more secure basis, and even in Belgium it was felt that the terms of the new agreement were no more unfavor- able than must, in almost any event, have been accepted.- It was plain that the chances for the stability of the Latin Union were now much better than they had been for several years past. Not only was the difficulty of redeeming in gold a great guarantee of permanence ; but, now that such redemption was really to be enforced, it was unlikely that there would be much desire on the part of the smaller countries to recur to a silver policy; while the large stock of gold held by France would make it quite impolitic to abandon a position so advantageous from a monetary point of view as hers. It was thus on a new basis, and with renewed prospects of continued existence, that the Latin Union entered upon the period between 1885 and 1893. On the other hand, however, the actual state of affairs was unchanged, and the new agreement, of course, furnished no assistance in overcoming the antecedent difficulties. The stock of surplus silver was as large as ever, nor was its depreciation less alarming than it had been, but rather more so ; while the good results which had been hoped for from Italy's gold loan 236 PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION 237 were proving less substantial than had been anticipated. Some of the gold was already flowing back to the foreign markets whence it had been drawn, and it was feared that the beneficial effects of the operation would be purely temporary. Thus there was little amelioration of existing conditions to be expected from the new treaty, save that the general situation was indi- rectly strengthened. The treaty of 1885 was, for the reasons already given, rati- fied by the various governments without formal objection, though it is true that, in Belgium, some disappointment at the rather rigid stipulations of the treaty was expressed. Nevertheless, Belgium was the first to yield the customary assent. This was formally published in the law of December 12, and received the royal signature on the 30th' of the same month. The analogous French law passed the senate on the 29th, ^ with little comment, but in Belgium the matter was not allowed to rest at that point. It was thought that some measure looking to the eventual extri- cation of Belgium from her unpleasant plight should be adopted, even if the fiscal situation did not admit of its becoming imme- diately effective. It will be recalled that Belgium still possessed the right to coin the remainder of the quota of subsidiary coin allowed her, and as onl}- 33 million francs had so far been issued, there remained about 7.8 million francs to exhaust the quota. Owing to the extent of the depreciation of silver the profit to be gained by issuing this quantity of coin was by no means an insignificant percentage of the total, and the actual profit was estimated at 300,000 francs or more. This profit would have been much greater had it not been provided that five million francs of the new subsidiary coinage was to be struck from retired five- franc pieces. It was, however, thought that the sum realized might well be devoted to the foundation of a fund from which to provide for the ultimate redemption of a portion of the five- franc pieces held by France. ' In order, however, to force these *See Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit.^ lS86, I, p. 172. "* Ibid,, p. I ; also. Documents Parlementaires, 1886, p. 329. ^Moniteur Beige, May 18, 1886. 238 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION coins into circulation, it would be necessary to free the Belgian circulation of foreign subsidiary coin. Of this a~ large quantity belonged to France. Measures were accordingly taken, and orders issued in accordance therewith, directing the retirement of all foreign fractional coin.' The monetary discussion had the effect of once more attracting general attention to the subject, .and in Italy it was decided, after some legislative argument, to appoint a monetary commission for the study of the question." The commission was to correspond with similar bodies in foreign countries, gather monetary statistics, and observe the course of silver quotations ; and it was' provided that the results of its studies should be published. 3 In France an attempt was made to secure the passage of a motion by the chamber of deputies to the effect that it recom- mend the resumption of the bimetallic conference of 1881.+ This effort had no result, for it seemed to be the general belief that the new treaty bade fair to strengthen the monetary league. Feeling against any new indorsement of silver did not, however, militate against the desire to keep the existing coin in circula- tion and prevent it from accumulating in large quantities in the public treasuries. Instructions were, in fact, issued by the treas- ury in August 1886, to withdraw gold 20-franc pieces, so far as possible, in order to permit the circulation of a greater quantity of silver five-franc pieces. It was frequently observed, moreover, that the ten-franc pieces were growing quite scarce, and had, in some quarters, almost disappeared ; and a glance at the figures for the reserve of the Bank of France showed that that institution was withdrawing them.s Despite, however, the determined opposition to bimetallism, the subject continued to be kept before the people. Toward the end of the year, indeed, it received a decided check, owing ^ Ibid. ' Gazetta Ufficiale, September 2, 1886. 3 In the Bolletino di Legislazioni e Statistica Comnierciale e Doganale. ^^e.^ Journal Officiel; also Aconomiste Franfais, February 10, 1886. 5 See statement of reserve in Bulletin de Statistique, 1886, 2; also London Econo- mist, 1886, p. 1081. PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION 239 largely to the unfavorable outcome of the silver schemes in America,' but the subject continued to be discussed at intervals. About the middle of the year 1887 a fresh opportunity for the bimetallists offered itself. At about this date a decided strin- gency in the money market was felt. Before long, exchange on all the principal European cities had risen considerably, and by October i exchange on London was 21 centimes above par. Simultaneously the rate of discount at the Bank of England was raised from 2 per cent, to 4 per cent.^ Gold was quoted at y^ per cent, premium. In reality, the stringency was purely tempo- rary and was chiefly due to speculation in South American loans. The reserve of the bank was higher by far than was nec- essary, amounting at one time, in 1887, to 1393 million francs, and there was absolutely no ground for fear. It was even to be desired that some of the gold reserve should be allowed to go abroad, instead of remaining at home. Just at this juncture, more- over, the report of the English monetary commission affected unfavorably the situation in France. Although a number of the members of the commission had strongly favored gold, the com- mission as a whole leaned toward bimetallism in its report. This again tended to strengthen the cause of silver. 3 Moreover, there were a number of other circumstances which, just at this time, combined to call attention more strongly than ever to the monetary question, and thus afford an excuse for bringing the discussion once more before the people at large. The matter of recoining the light-weight and worn gold coins was debated in the chamber, and incidentally the general monetary problem was touched upon. The appointment of a board which should pre- pare for a general international monetary congress at the time of the exposition of 1889 also drew attention to monetary affairs and, though interest by this time was not as intense as it had been, public opinion was much alive on the subject. The ^ Economisie Francais, October g, 1886. ''London Economist, October i, 1887. ^'it^ Report of Gold and Silver Commission, 1887; and zi, Economiste Francais^ November 24, 1888. 240 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION monetary discussion was not confined to France. In Switzer- land, it was decided to take a further step toward the attainment of an adequate gold circulation. As Switzerland had never pos- sessed an adequate currency of her own, it was voted to issue one million francs in 20-franc pieces. At the same time, the issue of six million francs in subsidiary silver was ordered.' The situation in Italy requires rather more attention. As already hinted, things were not going so favorably from the financial and monetary points of view as had been hoped. Gold had been flowing out of the country'' and, while this movement could not go far, owing to the large proportion of the new supply of gold held in banks and in the treasury, it was nevertheless a dis- couraging symptom, especially as the importation of silver also continued. This latter fact began to assume a serious aspect toward the close of 1887. The stringency that was felt on the Paris bourse manifested itself in an aggravated form in Italy. Exchange was so heavily against Italy that it began to be profita- ble to export the subsidiary coin and use it in the other coun- tries of the Latin Union. The stringency increased, and about the end of the year the Italian government, in order to diminish the stock-exchange crisis, deposited in the different banks sums of old Bourbon silver coins, 3 which had been withdrawn from circulation as security for an additional issue of notes to an equal amount. Furthermore, the power to turn the Bourbon coins into five-franc pieces was asked from the other countries of the Latin Union. + It was hardly to be doubted that the reply to this request would be unfavorable, and it was not long before the news came that France would not accede to the request. On May 7, 1888, the subject was again brought up in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, and a question was furthermore raised by ^Aconomiste Fran(ais, l888,p. 699. 'Bulletin de Statistique, antecit., 1 892, 1, p. 143. 3 Fifteen millions in the Banque Nationale (actual value of the metal), three mil- lions in the Roman Bank, three millions in the Tuscan Bank, two millions in the Bank of Sicily, 23 millions in all. * See Gazetta Ufficiale, November and December 1887 ; also Bulletin de Statis- tique,ante cit.; especially 1888, i. p. 737. PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION 24 1 M. Seismit Doda as to what could be done to hinder the specu- lation going on in Italian subsidiary coin. M. Magliani, the minister of finance, was unable to give any satisfactory reply concerning the coinage of silver, but announced that negotia- tions whereby some check would be applied to the speculation in subsidiary silver were now pending.' The already-mentioned prospect of a monetar}' congress to be held at Paris in connection with the exposition did not serve to quiet the bimetallic agitation. It was hoped that the con- gress would afford an opportunity for committing the govern- ments to a policy favorable to silver. The congress, however, did not justify any such anticipations. It was opened at Paris on September 1 1 by the French minister of finance, in a speech which gave no clue to his attitude on the silver question. M. Magnin, the president of the congress, deplored the fall in the value of silver, but even he held out no hope of any sacrifice on the part of France that would tend to relieve the existing sit- uation. The congress as a whole leaned strongly to a bimetallic policy, silver being supported by Grenfell, Arendt, Koch, Cernuschi, Foxwell, Laveleye, and others, but it was very appar- ent that the French delegates were much more conservative and supported gold almost unanimously.' Like all of its predeces- sors the congress came to an end without recommending any decisive measures and without bringing the countries any nearer an accord with regard to silver. The expiration of the Treaty of 1885 now began to be antici- pated with considerable interest. It was now nearing the close of 1889, and membership in the union might be discon- tinued at this time, by giving notice to that effect and comply- ing with other conditions. An announcement of intention to leave the union, should such an intention exist, must be made before the end of the year or a continuance of one year would be tacitly assumed. There seemed, however, to be as little wish ' Gazetta Ufficiale, May 8, 1888. 'Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit., 18S9, 2, pp. 200 et seq; also, Econotniste Fran- (ais, September 28, 1889. p. 386. See also ibid., p. 313. 242 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION to get rid of the union as there had been at any time in its his- tory. In fact, now that the troublesome question of redemption had been finally settled, there seemed to be no good reason why the union should be dissolved. Evidently, France had no inten- tion of demanding a dissolution, for the chamber postponed the discussion of the monetary question, thus practically renewing the union, so far as France was concerned, until January i, 1892 ; nor was there much desire in the other countries to depart from the league. The general Italian opinion on the subject was voiced by M. Magliani, former finance minister, who entered into a careful calculation of the benefits to be derived by Italy from various lines of monetary polity.' He found that a seces- sion from the Latin Union was quite out of the question, as the cost of redemption would be far too great to be incurred. On the other hand, there would be little advantage and much harm resulting from such action. According to his calculation the smallest conceivable expense to which Italy could be put in the case of such an event would be 50 million francs, and, in her present weak financial condition, this would be too heavy a load to be borne. Moreover, Italy had nothing to gain by the opera- tion save a possible increase in her ability to keep her coin at home. Much the same opinion seemed to be held in the other states and, though the Bank of France had been retiring as much as possible of the foreign silver and hoarding it in reserve, it did not now seem probable that it would be needed. Over 200 million francs in Belgian silver five-franc pieces, as well as about 1 50 million francs of those of the other states, were awaiting shipment in the bank vaults and, though there seemed to be no present prospect that they would be redeemed, it was thought best to hold them in reserve.' France was the more loath to take any step inimical to the continuance of the status quo for other reasons beside those readily apparent. It was, of course, to be expected that, whenever the necessity for redemp- tion should occur, a great monetary stringency would thereby 'See Nuova Antologia, Rome, October 16, 1889. = Haupt, Aconomiste Fran(ais, December 21, 1889, p. 769' PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION 243 be brought about. In this case, France would not be so favor- ably situated as might be supposed. It will be recalled that, in case of redemption, one half the coin was to be returned by the usual commercial methods. France, however, being already a creditor country, it would be hard to bring this about — at least for a considerable time. There was the less reason for anxiety on the part of France, because of the fact that the stock of gold in the banks of the world was increasing.' No scarcity of gold was to be observed, and the progress of the new monetary reform in Austria — a country whose money possessed some similarity to that of France — had relieved the fear that silver migh t still further infiltrate from that quarter." The year 1 889 closed and no hint of the abrogation of the treaty was yet given. During 1890, the reports concerning the character of the new silver bill in the United States, to the influence of which a slight rise in the price of the metal was ascribed, led some to urge that the opportunity for unloading silver had come. 3 Silver should be sold while the price was high, inas- much as the better quotation would lead to stimulated produc- tion, thus again depressing the quotation.* On the other hand, the bimetallists urged that the progress of the United States toward free coinage offered an opportunity to France to take similar steps without danger to herself. The new wave of mone- tary agitation, and the possibility that a new face might shortly be put upon the silver question, owing to the action of the United States, led in Belgium to the establishment of a new monetary commission ^ which was constituted by the terms of the royal decree of April 2, 1891. The finance minister himself, in his report to the king,* stated that the fall of silver was pro- ducing great industrial perturbation, and that, as there were more than 2500 million fratics of silver in the Latin Union, the abandonment of the "bimetallic" system must be productive of serious loss. On the whole, the monetary question received '/3«V., December 29, 1888, p. 785. 'Ibid., 1890, a, pp. 97 et seq. ^Jbid., July 27, 1889, p. 109. ^ Moniteur Beige, April 6, 7, 1891. ^ Ibid., 1890, I, p. 743. ^ BulletindeStatistique,antecit.,\%^^ ,l,^.if^^. 244 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION comparatively little attention during 1891. In Italy, however, matters were growing worse, and it was continually urged that the adoption of silver as standard money, or, what amounted to the same, the passage of a bimetallic law, would afford relief. Toward the close of the year, the agitation took on new strength as the time for secession from the union drew to a close. Noth- ing, however, was done; but, at the opening of 1892, the mon- etary question was brought up in the senate. January 25 the minister of the treasury, M. Rossi,' was asked by a member of the senate what measures the government would adopt to amelio- rate the monetary condition of the kingdom. The member also urged that the union be dissolved, and that silver be adopted as the standard of value, maintaining that this would improve the course of the rente. This attack was answered the next day by the minister in a conservative and moderate tone. ° He believed that the monetary question was by no means so serious as it had been in 1885. Italy was unable to play a controlling part in the Latin Union, that being the prerogative of France, and France was determined to adhere to the gold standard. As for secession from the Latin Union, it was out of the question. It was impossible to float any more silver, and the only rational policy would be to retain as much gold as possible, and refrain from disturbing the markets by monetary agitation. It was agitation, not the currency, that was injuring the status of the rente. He then reviewed the state of the monetary question in other countries, and maintained that only in the United States had the silver cause made any prog- ress ; and even there only because American legislators were all either agitators or silver-mine owners. It was just at this juncture that the government of the United States decided to take the initiative in regard to a new inter- national monetary conference on the silver question. During May, invitations to join in the conference were sent out. This ' See Gazetta Ufficiale throughout the latter part of January and compare Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit., 1892, 2, pp. 172 et seq. " Ibid. PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION 245 naturally renewed the monetary debate in the various legislative bodies of the Latin Union.' In Belgium the subject came up incidentally in connection with the discussion of an unimportant mint law. In response to the demands for an active silver policy in conjunction with the United States, M. Beernaert stated that at present the Latin Union was monometallic. It was undesirable to make any change, and at present impossible to redeem the silver. Consequently, Belgium would adhere to the Latin Union, and, while ready to discuss the monetary question with the representatives of the United States, could hold out little hope of support for silver.'^ This seemed to express the general feeling of the countries of the Latin Union for, when the conference finally met (November 22) at Brussels, their attitude was anything but favorable to silver. ' The plan of the confer- ence had been a very vague and general one. President Harri- son, in his invitation, had stated the object as being "to consider by what means, if any, the use of silver can be increased in the currency systems of the nations." The Latin countries, how- ever, showed little disposition to take any such steps, and one of the French delegates even advised, as a preliminary to any action on the part of France, that other countries should absorb as much silver as had France. Inasmuch as France had now about fifty francs of silver per capita, while others had only from fifteen to twenty-five francs, he thought that a part of the surplus silver might be consumed in this way."* Only two countries, Holland and Spain, both of which had but slight stocks of gold, were frankly bimetallic in their policy, and an English delegate even called upon the conference to pronounce all attempts at international action for silver useless. ' See, c. g.. Journal Officiel, June i, 1892 et seq.; ' and Gazitta Ufficiale, June 16, 1892. '' Moniteur Beige, May 26, 1892 ; also Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit., 1892, I, p. 738- 3 Vox proceedings see Procis-Verbaux ; Conference monetaire Internationale, Paris 1892; also Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit., 1892, 2, p. 634; also La Conference monHaire de Bruxelles, Paris, 1893, P- ^9- * See Prods- Verbaux, ante cit. 246 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION The representatives of the Latin Union had thus shown no leaning toward bimetallism nor any especial dissatisfaction with the status quo. Nqw, however, some difficulties which rendered new action necessary made their appearance. It had become profitable to export the Italian subsidiary coin, and consequently Italy was finding her silver subsidiary circulation decreasing. During 1892-3 the continued fall of exchange to a point 11 or 12 per cent, below par intensified the movement, and it became difficult to effect small sales in Italy. Even the five- and ten- centime pieces were collected and shipped. It was finally decided by Italy to refuse further adherence to the Treaty of 1885 so far as concerned the subsidiary coin; and, furthermore, to ask the return of her subidiary coin by the countries as had been done in 1878-9. This determination of Italy and the knowl- edge that a new meeting of the countries constituting the Latin Union would be necessary, rendered the approaching conference the most interesting monetary event of the day, especially as the international monetary conference of 1892, which had been adjourned to May 30, 1893, had been still further postponed to await action on the part of the administration in the United States.' Moreover, the message of President Cleveland, fol- lowing closely on the closing of the Indian mints to silver, had still further strengthened France in her anti-bimetallic policy.^ The desire of Italy for definite action on the part of the Latin Union took shape in a diplomatic note of July 8, 1893. The receipt of this note was followed by negotiations, and the date for a meeting of the conference was set at October 9, 1893. The Conference of 1893 does not demand minute study. There was little hesitation on the part of the powers to grant the demands of Italy. 3 Though carefully elaborated with the usual attention to detail, the arrangement* merely amounted to ' Cf. Rconomiste Fran^ais^ May 13, 1893, p. 596. 'Ibid., July 8, p. 33, and July i, p. i. 3Cf. Gazetia Ufficiale, August II, 1893; Aconomiste fran^ais, 1893, p. 513. * See Appendix I; Gazetta Ufficiale, August 11, 1893. PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION 247 an agreement on the part of France, Belgium, Switzerland, and Greece to withdraw within four months the Italian subsidiary silver in circulation within their territories, and place it at the disposal of the Italian government for redemption, in sums of not less than 500,000 francs each. Interest and expenses were to be borne by Italy, and it was provided that the other coun- tries might prohibit the importation, and Italy the exportation, of the Italian subsidiary coin. The execution of the Treaty of November 25, 1893, provid- ing for the retirement of the Italian coin, was successful, and did not occasion the friction and inconvenience anticipated in some quarters. The Convention of 1893 had been prefaced in France, Belgium, and Switzerland, by investigations into the condition of the subsidiary circulation, undertaken with a view to ascer- taining the exact status of the Italian coin in circulation in each of the countries. Greece neither paid any attention to the sub- ject, nor did she return any of the coin, inasmuch as little specie of any sort was in circulation within her limits. The investigation had been conducted for France by the banks of France and Algeria, the CrMit Lyonnais, the railway companies, and certain other financial and commercial organiza- tions. According to their showing, some 29 per cent, of the total French stock of subsidiary coin consisted of Italian silver.' The Swiss and Belgian investigations, which had taken place even before that of France, had resulted in an even more dis- couraging fashion. Switzerland was, owing to her geographical position, more heavily loaded with silver coin than either France or Belgium. The Swiss enquete, which took place July 23, 1892, had shown an immense preponderance of Italian coin over all other elements in the circulation. The investigation of July 23 had been continued on July 29 and 30, and might be con- sidered thorough. It showed that about 57.4 per cent, of the Swiss silver circulation was of Italian coin, and of the sub- sidiary coin not less, probably, than 70 per cent. It had for a ^ See Bulletin de Statisfique et de Legislation Comparee^ l893> 2, pp. 415 ^/ seq. 248 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION long time been known that Italian coin was being imported in large amounts,' but such an invasion as this had hardly been anticipated.'' Belgium was not so heavily loaded with Italian coin as either France or Switzerland. Still her enquHe showed that much more than half of her circulation consisted of foreign coin of some sort. This investigation, which was carried on by the Banque Nationale September i, 1893, was probably not so thorough as either of the others, but might at least be considered approxi- mately accurate. It indicated that nearly 18 per cent, of the coin considered was of Italian origin. 3 In all, about 200 million francs of silver subsidiary coin had been issued by Italy. The important question where these would be found was more difficult to answer. It was estimated by the administration of the mint, on the basis of the data just con- sidered, that the distribution of the Italian subsidiary coin might be tentatively stated thus (according to the presumed stock of each country, and the percentage shown by the investigation) . In France and French colonies: (In million francs) In Bank of France 3.4 In circulation 81.6 85.0 In Italy 63 In Belgium 7 In Switzerland 25 In Greece — Lost coin ' 22.4 117.4 Total 202.4'' Summing up all the information to be had, it seems that the situation may be expressed in the following table : ' Cf. Conference monitaire, ante cit., 1893; Procls-Verbaux, p. 80. ^ See Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit.^ 1893, i. p. 410. '^ Ibid., 1893, 2, pp. 498 et seq. * See Rapport de M. le Diputl Paul Delombre du 28 mat, i8g4, relaiif aux Frappes de monnaies divisionnaires Francaises necessitis par le Retrait des piices Italiennes. £>ocuf?ients Parlementaires, 1894, No. 656. Also Fconomiste Franfais, October 18, 1895, p. 508. PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION 249 DISTRIBUTION OF COINS QUOTAS AND COINAGES Nationality In France In Italy In Belgium In Switzer- land In Greece Various Total Quotas fixed in 1885 Amounts remaining uncoined Coinages to the end of 1893 Effect- ive cir- culation In bank Total Coined Millions Millions Millions % ^64 12.1 251.9 French 129.6 52-4 182 18 15 5 31-9 251.9 +20"! --4 202.4 Italian 81.6 3-4 85 63 7 25 22.4 202.4 3|-/J 40.S 40.8 Belgian 16. I 1-9 18 I 17 I 3.8 40.8 4h^ 22. Swiss 8.8 1.2 10 I 9 2.0 22.0 15 10.8 Greek 2.8 2.2 S 2 I 1.8 10.8 Total 238.9 61. 1 300 85 40 40 61.9 527-9 In the earlier part of the present chapter the legislation that accompanied the retirement has been summarized. According to the treaty provisions, the time tor withdrawal was to extend but four months after the ratification of the treaty. It will be recalled, however, that a decree had at once authorized the retirement of the Italian coin. The formal ratification was effected by the law of March 22, 1894; and, as the treaty was formally promulgated on the 25th of the same month, the extreme date for withdrawal would be July 25, 1894. By the expiration of the treaty, 4.9 millions had been retired in Belgium. Switzerland had withdrawn 13 million francs. The operation thus finally succeeded in withdrawing about 103 million francs in all. Retirements had been made as follows : Irrespective of treaty By virtue of treaty Total (million francs) 13 2 I3-' (million francs) 57.2 4-9 13 (million francs) 70.2 6.9 26.1 Belgium Total 28.1 75-1 103.2 250 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION The affair proved an expensive one for Italy. According to the ofificial report rendered in 1895, when the operation was fairly concluded,' the cost of retiring and redeeming the 103. 2 millions had been 114. 7 millions, an expense of 12.2 millions in withdrawal, 3.3 for purchases anterior to March 25, 1894 (in virtue of the French decree of 1B93), and 8.1 for purchases subsequent to that date. Italy herself had succeeded in withdrawing only about 23 million francs, so that not more than 126.5 niillions in all were on hand.° The issue of the two-franc and one-franc notes, how- ever, for the replacement of the coin had, at the same date, amounted to but no million francsj One point deserving of mention is the amount of coin which seems to have disappeared entirely. According to the prelimi- nary estimates, this had been placed at 22.5 millions ; but the outcome of the operation shows that it cannot be less than 30 or 40 million francs. 3 All in all, France, Belgium, and Switzerland had nothing to regret in connection with the withdrawal, inas- much as they secured the redemption of a large quantity of coin, worth considerably less than 50 per cent, of its face value, at little or no expense to themselves. The operation whose history has just been traced, had, how- ever, an unexpected result. From the very beginning of the process, the scarcity of small coin, already felt in some quarters, had grown more and more embarrassing. It had not been realized to how great an extent the other countries had relied upon Italian subsidiary silver for their daily transactions. This lack of coin was particularly troublesome in Switzerland, and finally led to a new meeting of delegates of the various countries at Paris in the autumn of 1897. No questions of any moment with reference to the general silver problem were seriously discussed. The delegates, in fact, confined themselves merely to raising the quotas of subsidiary silver assigned to the various countries. ' Relazione del Direttore generale del Tesoro a S. E. il Minisiro intorno alle opera- zioni per il riinpatrio delle monete divisionali Italiane d' argento, Rome, 1895. 'Ibid. ^Economiste Franfais, October 19, 1895, pp. 507 et seq. PERIOD OF COMPULSORY REDEMPTION 251 By the treaty' signed October 29, 1897, these quotas were established as follows : Old quota Additional quota Total For France, Algeria, and the colonies For Belgium For Italy For Switzerland (million francs) 264 40.8 202.4 25 (million francs) 130 6 30 3 (million francs) 394 46.8 232.4 28 It was, moreover, agreed that the bullion to supply these issues should be obtained by the withdrawal and remelting of old silver five-franc pieces, with the exception of three million francs for each country, which might be struck from new bullion. Should these three millions be so issued, however, the profit thereon (amounting in each case to 1.5 millions approximately) was to be used for the recoinage of old and worn coins, begin- ning with the gold. Greece resigned the right of issuing new frac- tional coin until such time as she should be able to take measures analogous to those pursued by Italy in 1893, and which have already been discussed.'' Rather more important, from the general monetary point of view, than the arrangement just described, was the protocol to that arrangement signed at Paris on the i 5th of the following March (1898). It will be recalled that Italy had, by Art. 15 of the Treaty of 1893, reserved the right to prohibit the exportation of her subsidiary coin. During the years imme- diately succeeding the signing of that treaty, Italy supplied the place of her subsidiary silver by an issue of small notes, the coin itself being maintained on deposit in the treasury as a guarantee of the notes. Under the then existing conditions in foreign exchange, it would be manifestly impossible to return to the issue of coin without some such measure, unless Italy were prepared to 'Rapport au Ministre des Finances, 3"° Ann^e, Paris, 1S98, pp. 5-8, for original text. See also Appendix I. ° The treaty, as above described, was ratified withbut modification by the French law of December 18. 1897, by the Belgian law of December 29, 1897, and by the Italian law of January 2, 1898. 252 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION repeat the redemption operations of 1893-1895. Italy now pro- posed, therefore, to prohibit the exportation of subsidiary silver and to withdraw the small treasury notes of two-lire, one-lire, and 50 centimes,' for the use of these notes had proved highly unsatis- factory. She therefore asked release from those provisions of the Treaty of 1885 that prescribed redemption of the subsidiary silver on demand, for a period of one year after the expiration of the treaty. The provision was, of course, made that no hin- drance should be offered to the return of the coin by regular commercial channels, and this agreement was to extend over a period of five years from the expiration of the Treaty of 1885. After some debate, both in and out of the chambers, the pro- tocol was accepted by France, and consequently by the other countries." During the last decade, the bimetallic agitation, formerly so active throughout the Latin Union, has very definitely decreased. The opinions of France, and her action in 1885, together with her subsequent attitude on the monetary question, have made evident the impossibility of taking any steps toward the rehabili- tation of silver. Until France shall change her position, therefore, there can be no thought of a new regime. Of the improbability of such a change, the recent unfavorable reception in Paris accorded to the bimetallic commission sent out by President McKinley affords evidence.' 'These operations were ordered by the law of February 16, 1899. See Gazeita Ufficiate, Rome, February 20, 1899. ^ See Journal Officiel, 1898, pp. 2187, 2437, 2459 (Documents Parlementaires, No. 346) ; also ibid.. No. 364, p. 2019 ; No. 369, p. lo88 ; also Journal Officiel, p. 8672. 3Cf. Aconomiste Franfais, 1897, 2, pp. 659-661. CHAPTER XX. THE PRESENT CONDITION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION. It will be observed that the foregoing investigation has not sought to pass any criticism upon the policy pursued by the states of the Latin Union, nor has any effort been made to cor- relate the silver question, as it exists in France and the allied countries, with the more general aspects of the monetary prob- lem. The object sought has been merely that of placing in a colorless historical light the action taken by the countries of the Latin Union, without reference to its bearing upon the question as a world-wide problem. Now, however, that the particular history of the Latin Union has been surveyed, it seems necessary to examine the present monetary condition of France and her allies in its relation to that of the commercial world as a whole. But before proceed- ing to any general discussion of the monetary question in France, as a particular case of the general silver problem, and before attempting to draw any inferences regarding the possible future course of events, it will be requisite to restate briefly the terms of the problem as it manifests itself in the Latin Union at the present time. In order to do this, it will be necessary to sum up the present condition of the circulation in the states of the Latin Union, so that it may be clearly understood just what is the mass of monetary metal with which France and her allies have to deal, and how this stock of coin is constituted. From what has pre- ceded, it is plain that the real crux of the silver question in the Latin Union lies in the extent to which France has become a holder of the coin of her allies. The condition and composition of the monetary stock of France is therefore the key to the situation. The principal sources of information concerning the compo- sition of the monetary system of France are the enquetes of 1868, 1878, 1885, 1891, and 1897. Numerous other estimates have 253 254 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION been made, but for the most part they rest upon th^ official inquiries already mentioned.' Interesting information has also been obtained through the analogous investigations in Italy, Swit- zerland, and Belgium, and by the less extensive inquiry made in France in 1893. While the returns thus obtained are not strictly contemporaneous, they may, as a whole, be relied upon to furnish a tolerably correct notion of the situation in the allied states. Considering first the returns obtained in 1897, at the last of the completed French official investigations,^ it is to be noted that the total sums of money examined September 15, 1897, amounted to 209,081,556 francs, of which 173,358,020, or 82.91 per cent., was in notes, and 35,723,535, or 17.09 per cent., in coin. In 1885, there had been 52,846,035 francs in all, of which 35,737,- 720 francs was in notes and 17,108,315 francs in coin. The 35i723,S35 francs examined in 1897 were divided thus: Gold 20-franc pieces Gold lo-franc pieces Silver 5 -franc pieces Fractional silver Token money Total Amount 23,199,640 9.3". 370 2,968,875 35.479.885 243,650 35.723.535 Per cent. II. 10 4-45 1.42 17.09 Gold was thus about 65 per cent, of the total coin. The progressive alteration in the character of the circulation may be understood by reference to the earlier investigations. The comparison (subsidiary and token money omitted) may be expressed as follows : 1868. 1878. 1885. 1891. 1897. Amount of sums examined 29,707,260 22,945,770 17,108,315 23,498,810 32,511,010 Gold 10 and 20 franc pieces 29,028,140 16,878,740 11,860,430 16,365,080 23,199,640 Sliver 5-franc pieces 679,120 6,067,030 5,247,885 7,133.730 9.3II.37O Per cent. Gold 97.72 73.55 69-33 69.62 71-37 Standard silver 2.28 26.45 30.67 30 - 3S 28.63 ■ Notably those of FoviLLB, Haupt, and Ad. Soetbeer. ^ Rapport au Ministre des Finances, 1898, pp. 115 et seq. PRESENT CONDITION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS ^55 Definite information regarding the extent to which the French circulation had been invaded by foreign coin may also be obtained from the same sources. A comparison analogous to that just made will give the following results : GOLD. 1868 1878 1885 1891 1897 Total amount 29,028,146 16,878,740 11,860,430 13.971,320 23,199,640 French coin 27,684,300 14,705,450 10,631,130 12,384,610 20,284,270 Foreign coin 1,343,840 2,173,290 1,229,300 1,586,710 2,915.370 Per cent. French 95-37 87.12 89.64 88.64 87.43 Foreign 4-63 12.88 10.36 11.36 12.57 The foreign gold coin was classified thus : 1878 1885 1891 1897 Total value Propor- tion in circula- tion Total value Propor- tion in circula- tion Total value Propor- tion in circula- tion Total value Propor- tion in circula- tion Belgian . . . Italian Greek Swiss Austrian . . . Russian . . . Spanish . . . 1,392,600 665.570 19,750 2,300 93,070 8.25 3.95 0. II 0.02 0.55 738,700 399,400 10,400 2,000 78,800 6.23 3-37 0.09 O.OI 0.66 807,060 559,440 18,990 3,840 177,350 17,960 2,070 5.77 4.00 0.14 0.03 1.27 0.13 0.02 1,340.390 1,053,340 59.520 35,680 290,380 116,600 19,460 5.78 4.54 0.27 o.is 1.25 0.50 0.08 Totals. .. 2,173,290 12.88 i,229,3ro 10.36 1,586,710 II .36 2,915.370 12.57 The same method of comparison may also be applied to the silver five-franc pieces. SILVER FIVE-FRANC PIECES. 1868 1878 1885 1891 1897 679,120 6,067,030 5,247,885 6,246,820 9.311.370 638,405 4,124,945 3.738,79s 4,277,860 8,159.925 Foreign coin 40,715 1,942,085 1,509,090 1,968,960 1,151,445 "Per cetit. French Foreign 94.00 67.99 71.24 68.48 87.63 6.00 32.01 28.76 31.52 12.37 256 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Divided as follows : 1878 1 88s 1891 1897 Total value Per ct. in cir- culation Total value Per ct. in cir- culation Total value Per ct. in cir- culation Total value Per ct. in cir- culation Italian .... Belgian . . . Greek Swiss 959,560 933,025 19,040 30,460 15.81 15-37 0.31 0.52 802,285 655,565 35,210 16,030 15.29 12.49 0.67 0.31 1,082,790 783,205 77,155 25,810 17-33 12.54 1.23 0.42 798,020 296,515 41,730 15,180 8.57 3-19 0-45 0.16 Totals... 1,982,085 32.01 1,509,090 28.76 1,968,960 31-52 1,151,445 12.37 So far, of course, nothing has been said of the actual volume of the coin held by the countries of the Latin Union. It is, naturally, difficult to arrive at anything like an exact estimate of this monetary volume. Still, various calculations have been made, and results that seem fairly trustworthy have been reached. In 1890 M. de Foville by an ingenious method of his own' estimated the total silver stock of France at 2500 million francs and the gold coin at 5000 million francs. At the end of 1887 M,. Cochut had estimated the silver on hand at less than 2000 million francs and Ottomar Haupt had calculated that the stock of coin existing at the end of 1885' stood about as follows: Gold in bank Gold in circulation Silver 5-francs in bank Silver 5-francs in circulation Subsidiary silver Subsidiary bronze Total coin Uncovered notes Million francs 1,157 3.300 1,086 2,400 250 60 8,253 675 Total - 8,928 In June 1887, Haupt estimated the total silver at 3550 mil- lions. In 1890, at the time of M. de Foville's estimates, he repeated his former estimates and adduced evidence to show '■ 'att Journal de la SociitS de Statistique de /"am, January 1886; also Za France Aconomique, Statistique, Raisonnle, et Comparative. ' Histoire monitaire de notre Temps, chapter on France. PRESENT CONDITION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 257 their correctness.' M. de Foville, however, maintained the accuracy of his own estimates, and, furthermore, restated the exact situation of the standard silver coin thus:^ Circulation Bank Total French five-franc pieces (million francs) 606 112 155 8 3 (million francs) 794 233 173 7 4 (million francs) 1400 345 328 IS 7 Greek five-franc pieces Total 884 1211 2095 The figures of M. Foville received the support of Dr. Soet- beer, who considered those of M. Haupt too high. 3 M. Haupt nevertheless reaffirmed the general exactness of his estimates in 1892, after a consideration of further data,'* though he reduced them somewhat, stating the stock of gold as follows : Stock in 181 5 Net imports, 1815-1891 Less industrial consumption, 1 795-1 J Less German indemnity Balance at beginning of 1892 — Gold, million francs 600 6500 7100 2900 270 ■ 3170 3930 Silver, million francs 1500 3600 5100 1340 240 1580 3520 He further stated the holding of foreign silver coin by the Bank of France, a short time before, as follows : Million francs Italian silver five-franc pieces 132 Belgian silver five-franc pieces 204 Greek and Swiss five-franc pieces 6 Foreign fractional coin 10 Total - 352 "See Aconomiste Pranfais, October 24, 1891, p. 329, and November 14, p. 611 ; also Bulletin de Statistiqe, ante cit., 1 887, 2, p. 663, ^ See Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit., ibid.; also Arnaune, La Monnaie, le Credit et le Change, Paris, 1892, pp. 208 et seq. 3 Arnaune, ibid. ^Monetary Situation in i8q2, p. 130. 2S8 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION The total of such coin in circulation and at the bank might be, he believed, roughly placed at 500 million francs, which would leave about 2700 millions in French silver five-franc pieces. He therefore stated France's total holding of coin thus : Million francs Gold coin and bars at the bank 1338 Gold coin in circulation 3690 French silver five-franc pieces at bank - 924 Foreign silver five-£ranc pieces at bank 340 French silver five-franc pieces in circulation 1800 Foreign silver five-franc pieces in circulation 160 French fractional currency 250 Foreign fractional currency 3° Bronze money 65 Uncovered bank notes - 57^ Total 8069 The two calculations just analyzed, so far as they deal with the stock of coin, may also be compared with the estimate of the official investigation of 1897, already quoted, which has estab- lished the following percentages for the foreign coin circulation in France as compared with the total circulation of each kind of coin: Gold Standard silver Fractional silver Belgian coin . Italian coin . . Greek coin. . . Swiss coin ... Austrian coin. Spanish coin. Russian coin. (Per cent.) 5-78 4-54 0.27 o.is 1.25 0.08 0.50 (Per cent.) 3-18 8.57 (Per cent.) 7.88 Total . 12.57 12.67 14.46 An estimate somewhat earlier in date states the absolute amounts of foreign coin in France thus : Belgian Italian Greek Total Million francs 260 250 '4 524 M. de Foville, however, still holds approximately to his former estimates. In a report made in 1896 he says:' "Of ' Rapport au Ministre des Finances, Administration des Monnaies et Midaillts, 1896, p. xi. PRESENT CONDITION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 259 French and foreign coin I estimate the monetary stock of the country at 2.5 milliards, or more, for silver. For gold the figure of four milliards, which has sometimes been stated, seems to me to be a minimum." In i8g8, after the latest official examina- tion of the coin, M. de Foville stated the condition of the French specie stock as follows :' French coin Foreign coin Total Gold (million francs) 3675 1380 205 (million francs) 525 555 35 (million francs) 4200 1935 240 Total 5260 1115 6375 M. Haupt recently believed that the figures stated by him in 1892 are still substantially correct, save that the Swiss (and of course the Italian subsidiary) coin seems for the most part to have disappeared. Difficult as it is to arrive at an accurate knowledge of the state of the French stock of gold and silver coin, the lack of statistical information makes it yet harder to get correct ideas concerning the state of affairs prevailing in the other countries. In Italy, it is safe to say, there is but little coin outside that in sight in the reserves and treasuries. This was estimated at the beginning of 1887 about as follows :° IN BANKS. Million francs Coined gold 302 Italian five franc pieces - 24 Foreign five-franc pieces 7 Fractional coin II 344 OUTSIDE BANKS. Gold in treasury 200 Gold in circulation 40 Silver in circulation 30 Fractional coin 191 461 Total '^ Rapport au Minisire des Finances, Paris, 1898, p. 12. 'See Bulletin de Statistique, ante cit., 1887, 2, p. 663. 805 260 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Other figures, given at the end of 1889, made the following showing on the basis of a slightly different classification : ' Metal reserve of Reserve of banks treasury of emission Decimal gold - 102,965,324 358,411,135 Silver five-franc pieces 5.139.445 61,756,760 Fractional silver 7,682,292 8,543,080 Non-decimal silver - 14,049,264 19,082,142 Monies and ingots deposited in institutions of issue 30,426,796 Total 160,263,122 447,793,118 M. Haupt's estimates for the beginning of 1892, which he thinks are substantially correct for the present time, differ some- what from those just given. According to him the following represents the Italian circulation at the beginning of 1892 : Million francs Gold in banks 371 Gold in treasury 114 Silver in banks 71 Silver in treasury 10 Fractional currency - 150 Bronze coin 75 Uncovered state notes 621 Uncovered bank notes 226 Total 1638 The coinage from 1862 to 1886 was : Francs Gold - 420,383,000 Silver five-lire pieces 364,566,000 Fractional currency 202,400,000 Bronze 76,200,000 Total - 1,063,549,000 He further believes that the Italian five-lire pieces were thus distributed : Million francs Switzerland 30 France - 128 Bank of France -132 Italian banks 50 Italian treasury - 10 Total 350 ^ Ibid., 1889, z, pp. 162, 163. PRESENT CONDITION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 26 1 So that Italy would at that time (1892) have had to redeem about 300 million lire in five-lire pieces. The situation thus con- trasted unfavorably with that existing at the time of the resump- tion in 1883, when the stock of gold, according to the same author, was this : Million lire Gold in banks - 77 Gold in treasury 515 Total 593 There were also at that time (1883) 81 million lire in silver in the banks, and 19 million lire in the treasury, making a grand total of 692 million lire. The foregoing estimates may profitably be compared with the later calculations of M. de Foville,' who has stated Italy's condition as follows : March i, 1896 December 31, 1898 (lire) (million lire) Gold in treasury - 89,974,481.00 131-8 Gold in banks of issue 440,812,054.06 376.3 Total 530,786,535.06 508.1 (Sufficient material for the determination of the active cir- culation is not at hand). Lire Million lire Silver in the treasury 148,889,378 I9I-9 Silver in banks of issue 63,536,618 35.6 Total 212,425,906 227.5 Little is known of the exact situation in Belgium. At the close of 1885, M. Haupt estimated the monetary stock as follows: Million francs Gold 270 Standard silver 240 Subsidiary silver 33 In 1893 fhe silver holdings of the National Bank were thus stated by the same author : Five-franc pieces, all nationalities 16,000,000 Subsidiary coin 18,000,000 Total 34,000,000^ ' Rapport au Ministre des Finances, ante cit., p. 84; also ibid, for 1899, p. 19. ' Arbitrages et Paritis, 8th edition, p. 845. 262 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION According to M. de Foville, little information regarding Bel- gium is to be found. M. de Foville says : On ne peut donner sur ce point, que des indications assez vagues. En 1880, les versements effectu6s aux di verses caisses de la Banque nationale de Belgique se divisaient ainsi ; or, 66 p. loo ; argent, 34 p. 100. Le stock d'^cus de 5 francs en circulation ^tait alors lvalue a 275 millions de francs. Aucun chiffre n'avait ^t^ donn^ pour I'or. La proportion s'est renversee depuis et on estirae, sans qu'il y ait eu d'enquete sur ce point en 1895, qu'il y a dans les versements, actuels 75 p. 100 d'argent et 25 p. 100 d'or seulement. Les pieces de 5 francs ne forment cependant qu'une faible partie de I'encaisse de la Banque ; mais la Banque donne lemoins d'or possible et opere g^neralement ses payements en especes avec des pieces de 5 francs. Sans donner aucun chiffre, on croit que le stock mon^taire or et argent s'est considerablement r^duit depuis quelques ann^es, a cause surtout de I'ex- portation du numeraire en France due aux conditions ordinaires du change. M'. de Foville has recently reaffirmed these opinions in his latest official report:' On ne peut guere se livrer qu'S. des conjectures en ce qui concerne I'im- portance du stock d'or et d'argent existant en Belgique. L'enquete effectuee en 1881 par la Banque nationale et le Gouvernement avait permis d'6valuer a 275 millions de francs les existences en pieces de 5 francs d'argent. Ce chiffre semble s'Stre r^duit adjourd'hui par suite des exportations, il ne serait plus que de 200 millions en y comprenant les 15 millions de francs qui se trouvent a la Banque. Sans pouvoir donner aucun chiffre pour I'or, on continue a croire que le stock en ce metal s'est encore reduit pendant I'annee, etant donne les con- ditions d^favorables du change. Of the condition of the Swiss circulation, likewise, no accu- rate information can be given. Haupt, in 1885,' estimated that the different elements in the circulation were : Million francs Gold 80 Standard silver 70 Subsidiary silver 18 In 1893 he gave the following estimate of the Swiss holdings of foreign silver (exclusive of French): Belgian silver 5 -franc pieces 2,000,000 Italian silver 5 -franc pieces 40,000,000 Italian subsidiary - 3,000,000 Total 45,000,000 ^ Rafport au Ministre des Finances, Paris, 1S99, p. 212. 'Ibid. PRESENT CONDITION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 263 In Greece, at about the same date, official figures fixed the amount of gold and silver at eight millions and two millions respectively, chiefly held in bank reserves. While it would be difficult to describe present conditions accurately, they are probably not materially different from those already indicated. No coin is in circulation.' Such, then, being the conditions as nearly as they can be ascertained, it may perhaps be worth while to note the bearing of the statistics just given upon some popularly received notions regarding the relation of France to bimetallism. There are several ideas which have gained very general acceptation, and on that account are worthy of attention. These notions may be roughly stated as falling into three classes, concerning (i) The relation of the Latin Union to silver in the past; (2) the influence which might be exercised by these states upon the price of silver should they accede to some one of the numerous schemes for the rehabilitation of that metal; and (3) the present status of silver in France and the allied countries. Under the first heading it is unnecessary to do more than discuss the most common of the numerous statements on the subject. This is the belief that, anterior to the year 1873, the states of the Latin Union had been silver-using, or, at all events, "bimetallic" countries; and that it was wholly, or in part, to their action in "demonetizing" silver that the first fall in the price of that metal was due. This statement, it is true, is very generally found in connection with the quite as commonly received assertion that Germany's action in "demonetizing" silver was the first important blow, and that an anti-bimetallic policy was really forced upon the Latin Union by Germany's action. According to this view of things, it was the German and French measures operating together which originally gave to the price of silver its downward trend. For the present purpose it is, however, quite indifferent whether we discuss the statement that attributes the original fall in the price of silver to the German action, and considers the policy pursued by the ' Conference monetaire, ante cit., Prods -Verbaux, 1885, p. 193. 264 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Latin Union as one of the necessary consequences of that action, or the one that ascribes the fall in silver to the com- bined action of the two groups of states. The fundamental error underlying both statements is that of supposing that the action of either country decreased the demand, either past or present, for silver. It would be out of place to discuss the case of Germany at this point, though it may incidentally be remarked that the statement just quoted with reference to Germany has never been substantiated. But how much truth does the state- ment contain when applied to the Latin Union ? In an early chap- ter of this study it was shown that the net imports of silver, from 181 5 to 1848, amounted to 2265 million francs. In the present chapter, the stock existing in 181 5 was stated, after Haupt, at 1500 million francs. This would mean a total of 3765 million francs in existence in 1848. The change in the circulation after 1848 is familiar. It suffices to call attention once more to the fact that, from 1848 to 1859, net exports of silver were 131 1 million francs,' leaving a net stock in the latter year of 2454 million francs. The net exports from 1859 to the formation of the Latin Union were 416 million francs. There was thus on hand, at the signature of the Treaty of 1865, only about 2038 millions. From 1865 to 1873 the supply slowly increased and, ' According to an independent estimate made in 1859, the export was even greater than this. Matigny [De la Disparition de la Monnaie d' Argent, Paris, 1859) estimated the destination of France's exports of silver from 1851-1857 as follows ; Destination Francs Spain 306,226,420 England - 243,290,220 Belgium 232,328,360 Switzerland 160,525,680 Sardinian States 130,338,620 Two Sicilies 75,839,200 Algiers - . 73,662,420 English India*- 30,024,900 R(Sunion 19,571,600 Turkey 14,555,940 Barbary States 10,917,200 Egypt - 4,569,800 German Union 3,519,000 Roman States Tuscany China Other countries 98,102,520 1,403,471,880 PRESENT CONDITION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 265 in the latter year, there was presumably in France about 2336 millions. These results may be summed up thus (in million francs) : 1815 1848 1859 1865 1873 Stock of silver in France 1500 3765 2454 2038 2336 It will be observed that this estimate makes no allowances for the loss of coin in the internal circulation by wear, by hoarding, etc. Taking now the conservative estimate of M. de Foville, in which large allowance for all these influences has been made, it it is seen that the present stock of France, 2175 to 2500 million francs, is larger by from 150 million to 500 million francs than it was in 1865, and is not far from the stock on hand in 1873. If, however, we take the estimate of Haupt, which is made up chiefly on the basis of importations and exportations, that is to say, if we follow a method identical with that just applied to the calculation of the stock existing in 1865, and in 1873, it appears that France now possesses 3520 million francs in silver, or nearly as much as she possessed in 1848, at a time when her circulation consisted exclusively of that metal. In view of this, it seems incorrect to argue that the "demonetization" of silver by the Latin Union lowered the price of silver by decreasing demand. Again, it is worth while to look at the matter from still another point of view. The argument just developed would not be considered conclusive by those who contend that France "maintained gold and silver at a parity from 1803 to 1873 by establishing a ratio of 15^^ to i." The reply would be made that France actually possesses a stock of from 4000 to 5000 millions of francs in gold. Had free coinage continued sub- sequent to 1873, a "market" would have been afforded for from 4000 to 5000 millions of silver, inasmuch as a slight fall in the price of the metal would have sufficed to make it flow in and take the place of as much gold. It would be argued that this was the process which took place between 1850 and i860, and that there is no reason why an opposite movement should not have occurred between 1870 and 1880. Were the mints of the 266 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Latin Union open to silver at the present time, such a market would be afforded as would instantly raise the price of the'metal. But the facts are against this mode of reasoning. In the course of this study, several instances have been cited where, although the law permitted payment in silver, custom demanded and enforced payment in gold. It is enough to call attention to the fact that the union has all, and morfe than all, the silver it can float. France is a wealthy country and is, as a rule, the creditor of other nations. If free coinage of both metals were to be allowed, it is unlikely that much gold would be lost. Gold would go to a premium, as measured in silver, and business ethics might even enforce the payment of contracts in full. Probably not a great deal more silver than is now in existence as coin could be maintained in circulation. The bank is not obliged to issue notes, or to exchange gold for deposits of silver. The only ultimate result would be a great inconvenience in business trans- actions, and more or less uncertainty regarding the future. The third of the three general notions concerning the Latin Union demands but a passing notice. It is apparent after what has been said that to speak of the Latin Union as a bimetallic body is incorrect. Business is as actually on a gold basis as if there were not a piece of legal-tender silver in existence. The five-franc pieces are essentially upon the same footing as bank notes. It is only their practical equivalence to gold, due to their reception by the government and to the attitude of the Latin Union regarding their redemption, that sustains their value. It is not difficult to predict the future of the Latin Monetary Union. Whether we accept the figures of M. de Foville or the much more pessimistic estimates of M. Haupt, the silver problem in France and the allied countries is a discouraging one. From 2.5 to 3.5 milliards of silver must be redeemed or maintained at a par with gold. Briefly, that sums up the situation. In case of liquidation, France would be obliged to demand from Belgium the redemption of at least 250 million francs in silver five-franc pieces, from Italy 270 million, from Greece 14 million. None of these countries are in condition to redeem such sums, while. PRESENT CONDITION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 26/ on the other hand, the aoiounts of French coin which they could offer by way of offset would be comparatively trifling; and, though the Treaty of 1885 reduced the- amount to be directly redeemed by one half, it goes without saying that this reduction is a farce. All the smaller countries are debtors of France and there is therefore not the faintest possibility of returning one half of these enormous sums by any ordinary commercial method. On the other hand, it is impossible that France could for a moment entertain the idea of sustaining the loss on the silver coin of her allies. The smaller countries are moreover in no condition to redeem even one half of the sums rtientioned, and they have comparatively few French five-franc pieces to offset against them. In order to liquidate the affairs of the union, the payment of a new indemnity would be required, but the indemnity would, in this case, be paid, not by France, but to her. It results from these facts that the Latin Union is doomed to existence in its present condition for an indefinite period, so that, although doctrinaire statements concerning the advisability of dissolving the union are frequently made, both in and out of the legislative bodies, they are quite without significance. The Latin Union as an experiment in international monetary action has proved a failure. Its history serves merely to throw some light upon the difficulties which are likely to be encoun- tered in any international attempt to regulate monetary systems in common. From whatever point of view the Latin Union is studied, it will be seen that it has resulted only in loss to the countries involved. APPENDICES APPENDIX I. TREATY OF 1865.' His majesty the king of the Belgians, his majesty the emperor of the French, his majesty the king of Italy, and the Swiss Confederation, equally animated by the desire of establishing a more complete harmony between their monetary legislative enactments to remedy the mconveniences in regard to communications and transactions between the inhabitants of their respective states, which result from the diversity of the standards of their silver frac- tional coin, and to contribute, by forming between them a monetary union, to the progress of uniformity of weights, measures, and money, have resolved to conclude a treaty to this effect, and have named for their commissioners plenipotentiary the following, to wit : , who, having had communicated to them their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed upon the following articles : Article i. Belgium, France, Italy, and Switzerland are constituted a union, so far as regards the weight, fineness, diameter, and circulation (between the public treasuries) of their gold and silver coin. Art. 2. The high contracting parties agree not to strike, or allow to be struck, with their stamp, any gold coin of other kinds than pieces of one- hundred-francs, fifty-francs, twenty-francs, ten-francs, and five-francs, deter- mined as to weight, fineness, tolerance, and diameter, as follows : Denomination Weight Tolerance Fineness Tolerance of fineness Diameter 100 32.. 25806 gr. .001 .900 .002 35 mm. SO 16. 12903 .002 .900 .002 28 20 6.45161 .002 .900 .002 21 10 3.22580 .0025 .900 .002 19 5 I .61290 .003 .900 .002 17 They will admit without distinction into their public treasuries, gold coins fabri- cated under the preceding conditions, in any one of the four states, with the reservation, however, that they exclude coins whose weight may have been reduced by wear yi per cent, below the tolerance stated above, or whose devices may have disappeared. Art. 3. The contracting governments undertake not to fabricate, nor allow to be fabricated, silver coins of five francs except of a weight, fineness, tolerance, and diameter hereinafter determined : 'Italics indicate substitutions made during debate. 271 272 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Weight Tolerance Fineness Tolerance of fineness Diameter 25 grams .003 .900 .002 37 mm. They will reciprocally receive the said pieces into their public treasuries, with the reservation, however, that they exclude those whose weight shall have been reduced by wear i per cent, below the tolerance stated above, or whose devices shall have disappeared. Art. 4. The high contracting parties will not hereafter strike silver coins of two-francs, one-franc, fifty-centimes, and twenty-centimes, except under the conditions of weight, fineness, tolerance, and diameter hereinafter determined : Denomination Weight Tolerance of weight Fineness Tolerance of Fineness Diameter 2 francs , I franc 50 centimes 20 centimes 10 gr. Sgr- 2^gr. I gr. .005 .005 .007 .010 •835 •835 •835 .835 .003 .003 .003 .003 27 mm. 23 18 (15)16 These pieces must be recoined by the governments which have issued them, when they shall be reduced by wear 5 per cent, below the tolerance stated above, or when their devices shall have disappeared. Art. 5. Silver coins of two-francs, one-franc, fifty-centimes, and twenty- centimes, fabricated under conditions different from those which are indicated in the preceding article, shall be retired from circulation before January i, 1869. This limit is extended to January [, 1878, for coins of two-francs and one- franc, emitted in Switzerland by virtue of the law of January 31, i860. Art. 6. Silver coins fabricated under the conditions of Art. 4, shall have legal-tender quality, between individuals of the state which fabricated them, to the amount of fifty francs at each payment. The state issuing them shall receive them from its citizens without limi- tation of quantity. Art. 7. The public treasuries of each of the four countries shall accept the silver money coined by any one or more of the other contracting states, conformably to Art. 4, to the amount of (50 francs) 100 francs at each pay- ment to the aforesaid treasuries. The governments of Belgium, France, and Italy shall receive on the same terms until January i, 1878, the Swiss coins of two-francs and one-franc issued in accordance with the law of January 31, i860, which are regarded in every respect during the same period, in the same way as the coins struck under the provisions of Art. 4. APPENDIX I 273 Art. 8. Each of the contracting governments undertakes to receive from individuals, or the public treasuries of the other states, the (fractional silver coins) subsidiary silver which it has issued, and to exchange such coin against an equal value of current coin (gold coin or silver five- franc pieces), on condition that the sum presented for exchange shall not be less than 100 francs. This obligation shall be extended two years from the expiration of the present treaty. Art. q. The high contracting parties shall issue silver pieces of two- francs, one-franc, fifty-centimes, and twenty-centimes, under the conditions indicated in Art. 4, only to an amount equivalent to six francs per capita. This amount, based on the last census taken in each state and the probable increase of population up to the expiration of the present treaty, is fixed : For Belgium at ( 30 million) 32 million francs. For France " (228 " ) 239 " " For Italy " (134 " ) 141 " " For Switzerland " (16 " ) 17 " " There are to be subtracted from the aforesaid amounts, which the govern- ments have the right to coin, the sums already issued : By France, under the law of May 25, 1864, in pieces of fifty-centimes and twenty-centimes, about 16 million francs. By Italy, in accordance with the law of August 24, 1862, in pieces of two- francs and one-franc, fifty-centimes and twenty-centimes, about 1 00 million francs. By Switzerland, under the law of January 31, i860, in two- and one-franc pieces, about 10.5 million francs. Art. 10. The date of fabrication shall hereafter be stamped on the gold and silver coin struck in the four states. Art. II. The contracting governments shall annually communicate the quantity of their emissions of gold and silver coin, the progress of the with- drawal and recoinage of their old (fractional) coin, as well as all the arrange- ments and all the administrative documents relating to coinage. They shall likewise give information with regard to all facts which affect the reciprocal circulation of their gold and silver coitis. Art. 12. The right of joining the present convention is guaranteed to every other state which shall except its obligations and which shall adopt the monetary system of the union in regard to gold and silver coins. Art. 13. The execution of the reciprocal engagements contained in the present convention is subordinated, so far as necessary, to the observance of the formalities and rules established by the constitutional laws of those of the high contracting parties required to bring about its application, and this application they undertake to effect as soon as possible. Art. 14. The present convention shall remain in force until January i, 1880. If, one year before this limit, it has not been renounced it shall 2 74 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION remain obligatory in full force during a new period of fifteen years, and so on, if no objection is made, fifteen years at a time. Art. 15. The present treaty shall be ratified and the ratifications of it shall be exchanged at Paris, within six months, or sooner, if possible. In evidence whereof, the respective commissioners plenipotentiary have signed the present treaty, and have thereto affixed their seals. Done in four copies at Paris, December 23, 1865. TREATY ADDITIONAL TO THE MONETARY TREATY CONCLUDED AT PARIS DECEMBER 23, 1865, BETWEEN BELGIUM, FRANCE, ITALY, AND SWITZERLAND. His majesty the king of the Belgians, the president of the French Repub- lic, his majesty the king of Italy, and the Federal council of the Swiss Con- federation, having judged it useful in the interest of the monetary circulation of their respective countries to revise by an additional treaty the treaty which was signed between the four states December 23, 1865, have named for their commissioners plenipotentiary the following to wit : SI:*****:):** who, after having had their full powers communicated to them, found in good and due form, have agreed to the following articles : Article i. The high contracting parties engage themselves for the year 1874 not to fabricate nor to allow to be fabricated silver five-franc pieces struck under the conditions determined by Art. 3 of the convention of Decem- ber 23, 1865, except to a value not to exceed the following limits, to wit: For Belgium 12,000,000 francs For France 60,000,000 francs For Italy 40,000,000 francs For Switzerland 8,000,000 francs The mint vouchers delivered up to December 31, 1873, are to be sub- tracted from the sums fixed above ; to wit : By Belgium 5,000,000 francs By France 34,968,000 francs By Itily 9,000,000 francs Art. 2. In addition to the contingent fixed by the preceding article the government of his majesty, the king of Italy, is authorized to allow to be coined during the year 1874 for the funds of the reserve of the Italian National Bank a sum of 20 million francs in silver five-franc pieces. These pieces shall remain deposited under the guarantee of the Italiah government in the treasuries of the National Bank of Italy until after the meeting of the monetary conference provided for by the following article : Art. 3. In the course of the month of January 1865, there shall be held at Paris a monetary conference between the delegates of the high contracting parties. APPENDIX I 275 Art. 4. The clause inserted in Art. 13 of the convention of December 23, 1865, relative to the right of admission is completed by the following arrangement: " The consent of the high contracting parties is necessary to the grant or refusal of requests for admission." Art. 5. The stipulation contained in Art. 5 shall have the same dura- tion as the convention of December 23, 1865. Art. 6. The present additional convention shall be ratified and the exchange of ratifications shall be accomplished at Paris as soon as it can be done. It shall go into effect from the time that the promulgation shall have been accomplished according to the laws peculiar to each of the four states. Ill evidence of which the respective plenipotentiaries have signed the present act and have thereto affixed the seal of their arms. Done in four copies at Paris, January 31, 1874. DECLARATION RELATIVE TO THE FABRICATION OF SILVER COIN DURING THE YEAR 1 875 IN FRANCE, BELGIUM, ITALY, AND SWITZERLAND. The undersigned delegates of the governments of France, Belgium, Italy, and Switzerland, being met in conference in execution of the additional mone- tary convention of January 31, 1874, and duly authorized to this effect, have under condition of the approbation of their respective governments agreed on the following provisions : Article i . The provisions of Art. i of the additional convention of January 31, 1874, relative to the limits assigned to the fabrication of silver five-franc pieces for Belgium, France, Italy, and Switzerland are continued for the year 1875. Art. 2. The Italian government having explained the necessity in which it found itself to remelt in 1875, in order to convert into five-franc pieces, a sum of ten millions of old silver non-decimal coin, each one of the contracting governments is authorized to have coined over and above the contingent fixed by the preceding article a sum of silver five-franc pieces which shall not exceed one-fourth of the aforesaid contingent. Art. 3. The mint vouchers delivered up to the present date are to be deducted from the contingents fixed by Art. i. Art. 4. Beside the contingent fixed by Art. i above, the Italian govern- ment is authorized to allow to be placed in circulation the sum of 20 million francs in silver five-franc pieces struck under the conditions of the additional convention of January 31, 1874, and deposited up to the present time in the treasuries of the Xational Bank of Italy. Art. 5. A new monetary conference shall be held at Paris in the course of the month of January 1876, between the delegates of the contracting gov- ernments. Art. 6. It is understood that until after the meeting of the conference had in view in the preceding article there shall be delivered no mint vouchers 276 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION for the year 1876 except to an amount not exceeding one half of the contin- gent fixed by Art. i of the present declaration. Art. 7. The present declaration shall be in force from the time that it shall have been promulgated according to the particular laws of each one of the four states. In token whereof the respective delegates have signed the present decla- ration and have thereto affixed the seal of their arms. DECLARATION RELATIVE TO THE MINTING OF SILVER COIN DURING THE YEAR 1876, IN FRANCE, BELGIUM, GREECE, ITALY, AND SWITZER- LAND, AND TO THE REPRESSION OF FALSE COINAGE. The undersigned delegates of the governments of France, Belgium, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, being assembled in conference in execution of Art. 5 of the monetary declaration of February 5, 1875, ^"d duly author- ized to this effect have, on condition of the approbation of their respective governments, agreed on the following provisions : Article i. The contracting governments agree forthe year 1876 not to fabricate, or allow to be fabricated, silver five-franc pieces struck under the conditions determined by Art. 3 of the convention of December 24, 1865, except to an amount not exceeding the sum of 120 millions of francs, fixed by Art. i of the additional convention of January 31, 1874. Art. 2. The said sum of 130 million francs is divided as follows : (r) For Belgium, 10.8 million; France, 54 million; Italy, 36 million; Switzerland, 7.2 million. (2) So far as it regards Greece, which by a declaration of Septem- ber 26, 1868, has agreed to the convention of December 23, 1865, the con- tingent fixed for this state, proportionately to those of the other contracting governments, is set at the sum of 3.6 million francs. (3) Beside the contin- gent fixed in the preceding paragraph, the Greek government is exception- ally authorized to have coined and to put in circulation within its territory during the year 1876, a sum of 8.4 million francs in silver five-franc pieces, this sum being destined to facilitate the displacement of the different moneys actually in circulation by the silver five-franc pieces struck under the condi- tions determined by the convention of 1865. Art. 3. The mint vouchers delivered up to the present date under the conditions determined by Art. 6 of the declaration of February 5, 1875, are to be subtracted from the contingents fixed by paragraph i of the preceding article. Art. 4. A new monetary conference shall beheld at Paris in the course of the month of January 1877 between the delegates of the contracting gov- ernments. Art. 5. Until after the meeting of the conference provided foi in the preceding article there shall be delivered no mint vouchers except to an amount not exceeding one-half the quotas fixed by paragraphs i and 2 of the present declaration. , Art. 6. Art. 11 of the convention of December 24, 1865, concerning APPENDIX T 277 the exchange of communications relative to monetary facts and documents is completed by the following provision : The contracting governments shall reciprocally give one another infor- mation of the facts which may come to their knowledge on the subject of the alteration and counterfeiting of their gold and silver coins in the countries which are or are not part of the monetary union, particularly in so far as regards the proceedings instituted and the penalties inflicted. They shall agree together upon measures to be taken in common in order to prevent alterations and counterfeits, to repress them, above all, wherever they may be produced, and to hinder the renewal of them. Art. 7. The present declaration shall be put in operation from the time that it shall be promulgated according to the particular laws of each one of the five states. In evidence of which the respective delegates have signed the present declaration and have thereto affixed the seal of their arms. Done in five copies at Paris, February 3, 1876. TREATY OF 1878. His majesty the king of the Belgians, the president of the French Republic, his majesty the king of the Greeks, his majesty the king of Italy, and the Federal Council of the Swiss Confederation, desiring to maintain the monetary union established between the five states and recognizing the necessity of embodying in the convention of 1865 modifications demanded by circumstances have resolved to conclude for this purpose a new conven- tion and have named for their plenipotentiaries the following, to wit : who, after having had their respective full powers communicated to them, found in good and due form, have decided on the following articles : Article i. Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland remain constituted a union so far as regards the fineness, weight, diameter, and circu- lation of their coined money of gold and silver. Art. 2. The denominations of the gold coin struck with the stamp of the high contracting parties are those of the pieces of one hundred francs,, fifty, twenty, ten, and five francs, determined as to fineness, weight, tolerance, and diameter as follows : Denomination Fineness Tolerance of fineness Weight Tolerance of weight Diameter 100 50 20 20 5 .900 .900 .900 .9bo .900 .002 .002 .002 .002 .002 32.25806 gr. 16.12903 6.45161 3.22580 1. 61290 .001 .001 .002 .002 .003 35 mm. 26 22 19 17 278 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION The contracting governments will admit without distinction into their public treasuries the gold coins fabricated under the preceding conditions in any one of the five states on condition always of excluding the coins whose weight shall have been reduced by wear 5 per cent, below the tolerance indi- cated above or from which the devices shall have disappeared. Art. 3. The denomination of the five-franc silver pieces struck with the stamp of the high contracting parties is determined as to fineness, weight, diameter, and tolerance as follows : Denomination Fineness Weight Tolerance of fineness Tolerance of weight Diameter 5 .goo 25 gr. .002 .003 37 ram The contracting governments shall reciprocally receive into their public treasuries the said silver five-franc pieces on condition of excluding those whose weight shall have been reduced by wear i per cent, below the toler- ance indicated above or whose devices shall have disappeared. Art. 4. The high contracting parties agree not to fabricate silver coins of two-francs, one-franc, fifty-centimes, and twenty-centimes except under the conditions of fineness, weight, diameter, and tolerance hereinafter determined : Denomination Fineness Tolerance of fineness Weight Tolerance of weight Diameter 2 I SO 20 •835 ■835 •835 •835 .003 .003 .003 ■003 10 gr. 5 250 100 .005 .005 .007 .010 27 mm. 23 18 16 These coins shall be recoined by the governments which shall have emitted them when they shall be reduced by wear to 5 per cent, below the tolerance indicated above, or when their devices shall have disappeared. Art. 5. The silver coins fabricated under the conditions of Art. 5 shall have legal-tender quality between the individuals of the state which has emitted them up to the amount of fifty francs at each payment. The state which has put them in circulation shall receive them from its inhabitants without limitation of quantity. Art. 6. The public treasuries of each one of the five states shall accept the silver coin fabricated by one or more of the other contracting states in con- formity to Art. 4 to the amount of 100 francs for each payment made the aforesaid treasuries. Art. 7. Each one of the contracting governments engages itself to take back from individuals, or the public treasuries of the other states, the silver subsidiary coin which it has emitted, and to exchange it against an equal APPENDIX I 279 value of current money in gold pieces or pieces of silver fabricated under the conditions of Articles 2 and 3, on condition that the sum presented for exchange shall not be less than 100 francs. This obligation shall be binding for the space of one year from the expiration of the present convention. Art. 8. The Italian government having declared its willingness to sup- press its fractional paper currency of denominations less than five-francs, the other contracting states, in order to facilitate this operation for it, engage themselves to retire from circulation and cease to receive into their public treasuries the subsidiary silver Italian coins. These coins shall be anew admitted into the public treasuries of the other contracting 'states from the time that the regime of the forced circulation of paper money shall have been terminated in Italy. It is understood that, when the operations relative to the withdrawal of the international circulation of the Italian subsidiary coins shall have ceased, the application of the provisions of Art. 7 shall be suspended with regard to Italy. Art. 9. The coinage of gold pieces fabricated under the conditions of Art. 2, with the exception of that of the gold five-franc pieces which remain provisionally suspended, is free for each one of the contr.icting states. The coinage of silver five-franc pieces is provisionally suspended. It shall be resumed when a unanimous agreement shall be established on this point between all the contracting states. Art. 10. The high contracting parties cannot emit silver coins of two- francs, one-franc, fifty-centimes, and twenty-centimes, struck under the con- ditions indicated in Art. 4, except to an amount corresponding to six francs per capita. This figure estimated according to the last returns made in each state is fixed for Belgium at 33 million francs; for France at 240 million francs; for Italy at 170 million francs; for Greece at 10.5 million francs ; for Switzerland at 8 million francs. The amounts heretofore coined by the contracting states up to the present date, are to be subtracted from the above sums. Art. II. The date of fabrication shall be inscribed, in rigorous conform- ity with the actual date of coining, on the gold and silver coins struck in the five states. Art. 12. The contracting governments shall annually communicate to one another the amount of their emissions of gold and silver as well as all the decrees and all the documents relative to moneys. They shall equally advise one another of all the facts which are of inter- est in regard to the reciprocal circulation of their coined moneys of gold and silver, and especially of all that shall come to their knowledge on the subject of counterfeiting, or of alterations of their coins in the countries which do or do not form part of the union, notably in whatever concerns the methods .employed, the proceedings instituted, and the penalties inflicted; they shall concert measures to be taken in common to prevent counterfeits and alterations, 280 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION to repress them, especially where they are produced, and to hinder their renewal. They shall take also the measures necessary to hinder the circulation of counterfeit or altered coins. Art. 13. Every demand for admission to the present convention made by a state which shall accept its obligations, and which shall adopt the mone- tary system of the union cannot be granted but by the unanimous consent of the high contracting parties. Art. 14. The execution of the reciprocal engagements contained in the present treaty is subordinated to the accomplishment of the formalities and rules established by the constitutional laws of the high contracting parties, who are required to enforce the application of it, and this they undertake to do in the briefest time possible. Art. 15. The present convention shall go into effect on and after January I, 1880, and shall remain in force until January i, 1886. If, one year before the expiration of this period, it has not been renounced, it shall continue in full force by tacit continuation, and shall remain binding until the expiration of one year after the renunciation shall be made. Art. 16. The present convention shall be ratified and the ratifications of it shall be exchanged at Paris within the space of eight months, or sooner it possible. In evidence of which, the respective plenipotentiaries have signed the treaty and have thereto affixed the seal of their arms. Done in five copies at Paris, November 5, 1878. ARRANGEMENT RELATIVE TO THE EXECUTION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE MONETARY TREATY OF NOVEMBER 5, 1878. The governments' of Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, having with one common accord resolved to execute, before the enforcement of the monetary treaty concluded on the present date between the five states, the provisions contained in paragraph i of Art. 8 of the said conven- vention, provisions thus expressed : The Italian government having declared its willingness to suppress all fractional paper currency of denominations less than five francs the other contracting states engage themselves, in order to facilitate this operation for it, to retire from circulation and cease to receive into their pubhc treasuries, the subsidiary silver Italian coins : The undersigned, duly authorized, have agreed to the following articles : Article i. The retirement of the Italian coins of twenty- and fifty-cen- times, one-franc and two-francs, which exist in Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, must be completed before Deeember r, 1879. After this date these coins shall cease to be received in the public treasuries of the before-mentioned states. APPENDIX I 281 Art. 2. The coin retired in Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland shall in the month which shall follow the completion of the retirement be remitted to the French government, which, undertaking to centralize it in order to transmit it to the Italian government, shall reimburse the governments of the three aforesaid states in cash, including the expenses. Art. 3. The account of the coins retired from circulation in Belgium, France, Greece, and Switzerland, shall be closed between France and Italy on January 31, 1880. The French and Italian governments having estimated the amount of the fractional Italian coins existing in the four states at the sum of 100 millions, of which 13 millions are in Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland, and 86 millions in France, this account will comprehend at first a maximum aggre- gate of 13 millions of coins coming from Belgium, Greece and Switzer- land, and a maximum aggregate of 87 millions of coins retired from circula- tion in France. It shall comprehend afterward and separately the excess over these sums if any. The said sum of 100 millions and the possible excess provided for in the preceding paragraph shall be carried to the credit of the Italian government in a running account on which the interest shall be computed at the rate of 3 per cent, a year payable in coin, starting from the day when the coin retired shall have ceased to circulate in the four stales. Art. 5. The redemption by the Italian government of the coin which shall have been remitted to it, up to the sum of 100 millions (forming the first part of the account provided for in Art. 3), shall take place at Paris. It shall be effected either in gold or silver five-franc pieces or in bills of exchange on Paris or in vouchers of the Italian treasury payable at Paris and shall be made under the following conditions : (i) In cash, coin coming from Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland 13 m ) ' ° 6 ' ,1-^0.00 " " " " " France S7 m i '' (2) During the year 1881 23.3 " " 18S2- 23.3 " " 1SS3 23.4 100. The Italian government reserves to itself, however, the freedom of paying up the debt in advance. Art. 6. If in the operation of retirement there turns out an excess of coin over and above the 13 and 87 millions provided for in Articles 3 and 4 the excess shall be held at the disposal of the Italian government which shall remit the equivalent in cash when it shall receive such excess. Art. 7. The Italian government agrees, conformably to its determination announced in paragraph i of Art. 8 of the monetary treaty, concluded on the present date, to retire from circulation and destroy, — at the latest, within the 252 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION six months which shall follow the remittance of the whole of the fractional coin forming the subject of Art. 5, — the whole of its fractional notes of denominations less than five-francs. It undertakes, moreover, with the view of a definite re-establishment of its metallic circulation not to remit new ones. In execution of Art. 12 of the before-mentioned monetary convention the Italian government shall communicate to the three governments of the union a statement of the amounts which it shall have retired and melted and that within the space of four months after the accomplishment of these operations. Art. 8. The Italian government shall reimburse to the French govern- ment at the same time with the first of the annual payments specified in Art. 5, the expenses of every kind (including the cost of transportation to the frontier) to which the operations provided for by the present arrangement shall give rise, these expenses in no case to exceed the sum of 250,000 francs. Art. g. The present arrangement shall be ratified and the ratifications shall take place at Paris at the same time with those of the monetary con- vention concluded on the present date between the five states. In evidence of which the undersigned have signed the present arrange- ment and have thereto affixed the seal of their arms. Done in five copies at Paris, November 5, 1878. PROTOCOL. At the moment of proceeding to the s gnature of the arrangement relative to the execution of Art. 8 of the monetary convention concluded on the present date between Belgium, France, Greece, Italy and Switzerland, the undersigned plenipotentiaries of the president of the French Republic, and his majesty the king of Italy, wishing to fix with one common accord the precise meaning of the words " in cash" inserted in Articles 5 and 6 of the said arrangement, have in the name of their respective governments decided and agreed on what follows : 1. So far as concerns Art. 5, the reimbursement to the Italian government of the 13 millions representing the amount of the fractional coin coming from Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland, shall be effected in the first fifteen days of the month of January 1880. The reimbursement of the 17 millions representing the amount of the coin coming from France shall be effected in the course of the year 1880. 2. So far as concerns Art. 6, the reimbursement in cash of the sum repre- senting che equivalent of the coins composing the possible excess above the 100 millions shall be effected, as stipulated in Art. 5 at Paris, either in gold or silver five-franc pieces, or bills on Paris, or Italian treasury vouchers payable at Paris. The present Protocol, which shallbe considered as approved and sanctioned APPENDIX I 283 by the respective governments, without other special ratification, by the sole fact of the exchange of ratifications on the monetary arrangement to which it relates, has been prepared in two copies, at Paris, November 5, 1878. DECLARATION RELATIVE TO THE MINTING OF SILVER COIN DURING THE YEAR 1879. The undersigned delegates of the governments of Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, being united in conference in execution of Art. 4 of the monetary declaration of February 5, 1876, of which the applica- tion had by common consent been put off until the year 1878, and duly authorized to this effect, have, on condition of the approbation of their respec- tive governments, agreed on the following provisions : Article 1. The governments of France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland engage themselves for the year 1879 not to fabricate or allow to be fabricated silver five-franc pieces. Art. 2. The Italian government is allowed to have coined during the year 1879 an extraordinary sum of 20 million francs in silver five-franc pieces. Art. 3. The five contracting governments engage themselves not to deliver mint vouchers during the year 1879. The present declaration, to go into effect after January i, 1879, shall be ratified and the ratifications shall be exchanged so soon as it can be done. In evidence of which the respective delegates have signed the present declaration and have affixed thereto the seal of their arms. ACT ADDITIONAL TO THE ARRANGEMENT RELATIVE TO THE EXECUTION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE MONETARY CONVENTION OF NOVEMBER 5, 1878. The governments which signed the monetary treaty of November 5, 1878, having thought that they ought to leave to Italy the power to postpone to such time as she may consider convenient, the retirement of its fractional paper currency of denominations less than five-francs anticipated by Art. 8 of the aforesaid treaty. The undersigned, duly authorized to this effect, have agreed on the follow- ing provisions ; Article i. The Italian subsidiary silver coins retired from circulation in Belgium, in France, in Greece, and in Switzerland, and placed on deposit by the French government agreeably to Art. 2 of the arrangement subjoined to the monetary convention of November 5, 1878, shall be held at the disposal of the Italian government. The account of these coins shall be settled between France and Italy on January 31, 1880. Art. 2. The French government shall ship these coins to the Italian government at the localities which it shall indicate upon its frontier or to Civita- Vecchia. 284 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION The coin coming from Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland, whose amount is estimated at the sum of 13 milhons, shall be shipped, to the aggregate amount of the aforesaid sum, during the first fifteen days of the month of January 1880. The balance of the coins retired after the account has been settled between France and Italy shall be shipped during the first six months of the same year, 1880. Art. 3. The redemption by the Italian government of the coins which shall have been remitted to it shall be accomplished either in gold or in silver five-franc pieces or in bills on Paris, or in Italian treasury obligations payable at Paris, and shall be made at the following times : (i) During the first fifteen days of the month of January 1880, the sum of 13 millions representing the redemption value of the coins coming from Belgium, Greece, and from Switzer- land ; (2) During the course of the year 1880, the sum of 17 millions; (3) During the course of each one of the years 1 88 1 , 1882, and 1883, one-third of the sum representing the balance of the amount of the coin retired, the said sum bearing a maximum interest of 3 per cent, per annum payable in coin from the date of shipment of the coin. The Italian government reserves to itself, furthermore, the power to liquidate in advance. > Art. 4. In case the Italian government should express a desire to post- pone the receipt of coins other than the 13 millions coming from Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland, the French government, upon notification which shall be addressed to it as to the matter before December 31, 1879, undertakes to reserve them in whole or in part, in order to hold them at any moment at the disposal of the Italian government until the dates of maturity fixed by the preceding article for the redemption, in consideration of a maximum interest of }i per cent., payable in coin, to run from January, I, 1880, to the date of the delivery of the coins. Art. 5. The effective circulation including both subsidiary silver coin and notes of denominations less than five-francs shall not exceed the figure of six francs per capita stipulated in Art. 10 of the treaty of November 5, 1878. In consequence, the coins which shall have been returned to the Italian government, as has been said in Articles 2 and 4 of the present act, shall not be issued for circulation except to serve in exchange for notes of denomina- tions less than five-francs, at the time of the legal retirement of the aforesaid notes. Art. 6. The Italian government shall reimburse to the French govern- ment, at the same time as the balance of the amount of the coins which shall have been returned to it, the expenses of every kind, including the expenses of transportation to the frontier, to which the operations provided for in the present additional act, as well as by Articles i and 2 of the arrangement APPENDIX I 285 annexed to the treaty of November 5, 1878, these expenses not to exceed, in any case, the sum of 250,000 francs. Art. 7. The present additional act is intended to replace Articles 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, of the arrangement of November 5, 1878, in case the Italian government shall demand its application at the time when the ratifications of the said treaty shall be exchanged. Art. 8. The present act, additional to the monetary arrangement of November 5, 1878, shall be ratified, and the ratifications of it shall be «xchanged at Paris at the same time with those of the said arrangement. In evidence of which, the undersigned have prepared the present act, to which they have affixed the seal of their arms. Done at Paris, June 20, 1879. TREATY OF 1885. The president of the French Republic, his majesty the king of the Greeks, his majesty the king of Italy, and the Federal Council of the Swiss Con- federation, Desiring to maintain the monetary union established between the four states, and recognizing the necessity of modifying and completing, on certain points, the Convention of November 5, 1878, have resolved to conclude to this effect a new treaty, and have named for their plenipotentiaries the follow- ing, to wit : ********* who, after having had corhmunicated to them their full powers, found in good and due form, have settled on the following articles : Article i. France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland remain constituted a union so far as regards the fineness, weight, diameter, and tolerance and ■circulation of their coined money of gold and silver. Art. 2. The denominations of coined gold struck with the stamp of the high contracting parties are those of one-hundred-francs, fifty-francs, twenty- francs, ten-francs, five-francs, and determined as to fineness, weight, toler- ance, and diameter as follows : Denomination Fineness Tolerance of fineness Weight Tolerance of weight Diameter 100 50 20 10 5 .900 .900 .900 .900 .900 .001 .001 .001 .001 .001 32.25806 gr. 16.12903 6.45161 3.22580 I. 61290 .001 .001 .002 .002 .003 35 mm. 28 21 19 17 The contracting governments will admit without distinction into their public treasuries the gold pieces fabricated under the preceding conditions in any 286 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION one of the four states, under condition of excluding always those coins whose- weight shall have been reduced by wear yi. per cent, below the tolerance indi- cated above, or whose impressions shall have disappeared. Art. 3. The type of the silver coin of five-francs struck with the stamp of the high contracting parties is determined as to fineness, weight, tolerance, and diameter as follows : Fineness Tolerance of fineness Weight Tolerance of weight Diameter 900 2 25 3 37 The contracting governments shall reciprocally receive into their treas- uries the said silver five-franc pieces. Each one of the contracting states engages itself to redeem from the public treasuries of the other states the silver five-franc pieces whose weight shall be reduced by wear i per cent, below the legal tolerance, provided that they have not been fraudulently altered, and that their impressions have not disappeared. In France the silver five-franc pieces shall be received in the treasuries of the Bank of France for account of the treasury, as is provided by the letters exchanged between the French government and the Bank of France on the dates of October 31 and November 2, 1885, and annexed to the present treaty.- This engagement is undertaken during the life of the present treaty as it has been fixed by paragraph i of Art. 13, and without the bank's being bound at the expiration of this period by the clause of tacit renewal provided in paragraph 2 of this same article. In case the provisions concerning the legal-tender quality of the silver five-franc pieces, struck by the other states of the union, should be with- drawn either by Greece, Italy, or Switzerland during the time of the engage- ment undertaken by the Bank of France, the power or powers which shall have acted counter to these provisions, agree that their banks of emission shall receive the silver five-franc pieces of the other states of the union under conditions identical with those under vifhich they receive silver five- franc pieces coined with the national stamp. Two months before the expiration of the term assigned for the renuncia- tion of the treaty, the French government shall make known to the states of the union whether or not it is the intention of the Bank of France to continue or to cease the fulfillment of the agreement hereto subjoined. In default of such communication, the agreement of the Bank of France shall be subjected to the provision for tacit renewal. Art. 4. The high contracting parties undertake not to fabricate silver coins of two-francs, one-franc, fifty-centimes, and twenty-centimes except APPENDIX I 287 under the conditions of fineness, weight, tolerance, and diameter hereinafter determined : Denomination Fineness Tolerance of fineness Weight Tolerance of weight Diameter 2fr. Ifr. 50c. 20c. •835 ■835 •835 ■835 .003 .003 .003 .003 10 gr. 5 2.50 1. 00 .005 .005 .007 .010 27 mm. 23 18 16 These pieces shall be recoined by the governments which shall have emitted them, when they shall be reduced by wear yi per cent, below the tolerance indicated above, or when their impressions shall have disappeared. Art. 5. The silver coins fabricated under the condition of Art. 4 shall have legal-tender quality between individuals of the state which has emitted them up to fifty francs at each payment made the said treasuries. Art. 7. Each of the contracting governments agrees to receive from individuals, or from the public treasuries of the other states, the subsidiary silver coin which it has emitted, and to exchange them against an equal value of the current coin in pieces of gold or silver fabricated under the con- ditions of Articles 2 and 3, on condition that the sum presented for exchange shall not be smaller than 100 francs. This obligation shall be prolonged dur- ing one year after the expiration of the present treaty. Art. 8. The coinage of gold pieces, fabricated under the conditions of Art. 2, with the exception of that of the gold five-franc pieces which remains provisionally suspended, is free for each one of the contracting states. The coinage of silver five-franc pieces is provisionally suspended. It can be resumed only when a unanimous accord shall be established on the subject between all the contracting states. If any one of the contracting states wishes to resume the free coinage of silver five-franc pieces, it shall always have the power to do so on condition of exchanging or reimbursing during the whole duration of the present treaty in gold and at sight, to the other contracting countries, upon their demand, the silver five-franc pieces struck with its impression and circulating within their territory. Further, the other states shall be free no longer to receive the five- franc pieces of the state which shall resume the coinage of the said pieces. The state which wishes to resume this coinage shall in the first place summon a meeting of its allies to regulate the conditions of the resumption without, however, the power mentioned in the preceding paragraph being subordinated to the establishment of an understanding, and without the condition of exchange and reimbursement mentioned in the preceding paragraph being modified. In default of an understanding and while claiming the benefit of the stipulations which precede, with regard to the state which shall resume 283 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION the free coinage of silver five-franc pieces, Switzerland reserves to itself the power to secede from the union before the expiration of the present treaty. This power is always subject to the double condition : 1. That during four years after the ratification of the present treaty Art. 14 and the annexed arrangement shall not be applicable with regard to the states which shall have resumed the free coinage of silver five-franc pieces and, 2. That the silver coin of the same states shall continue during the same period to circulate in Switzerland conformably to the stipulations of the pres- ent convention. On its side, Switzerland agrees not to resume during the same period of four years the free coinage of silver five-franc pieces. The Swiss federal government is authorized to continue the recoinage of the old emissions of Swiss silver five-franc pieces up to an amount of ten million francs but on condition that it undertakes to effect at its own expense the retirement of the old coins. Art. q. The high contracting parties cannot emit coins of two-francs, one-franc, fifty-centimes, and twenty-centimes struck under the conditions indicated by Art. 4, except to an amount corresponding to six francs per capita. This figure, taking account of the last returns effected in each state and of the normal increase of population, is fixed: For France 256,000,000 For Greece - 15,000,000 For Italy 182,000,000 For Switzerland 19,000,000 The quantities emitted by the contracting governments up to the present date shall be subtracted from these figures. The Italian government is exceptionally authorized to have coined a sum of 20 millions in fractional silver coins, this sum being destined to ensure the replacement of the old coin by pieces struck under the conditions of Art. 4 of the present treaty. The Swiss federal government is authorized by special permission, regard being had to the needs of the population, to have fabricated a sum of six millions of fractional silver coin. Art. 10. The date of fabrication shall be inscribed on the pieces of gold and silver struck in the four states, in rigorous conformity with the date of coinage. Art. II. The government of the French Republic accepts the duty of centralizing all the administrative and statistical documents relative to the emissions of coin, to the production and consumption of the precious metals, to the monetary circulation, to counterfeiting, and to the alteration of the APPENDIX I 289 moneys. It shall communicate them to the other governments and the con- tracting countries shall take counsel together, if it is expedient, on measures proper to give these returns all desirable exactness so as to prevent counter- feiting and alteration of moneys and to ensure its repression. Art. 1 2. No request for admission to the present treaty made by a state which shall accept the obligations and shall adopt the monetary system of the union, can be accepted but by the unanimous consent of the high contract- ing parties. These latter engage themselves to retire or refuse legal-tender quality to the five-franc pieces of the states which do not form part of the union. These coins cannot be accepted either into the public treasuries or into the banks of emission. Art. 13. The present treaty shall go into effect after January i, 1886, and shall remain in force up to January .1, 1891. If, one year before this time, it has not been renounced it shall be extended in full force from year to year by tacit renewal, and shall continue to be obligatory during one year after the January ist which shall follow the renunciation. Art. 14. In case of the renunciation of the present treaty each of the contracting states shall be held to receive back the silver five-franc pieces which it shall have emitted and which shall be in circulation or in the public treasuries of the other states, on condition of paying to these states a sum equal to the nominal value of the coin received back, the whole under condi- tions determined by a special arrangement which shall remain annexed to the present treaty. Art. 15. The present treaty shall be ratified ; the ratifications shall be exchanged at Paris so soon as it can be done, and at the farthest on Decem- ber 30, 1885. In evidence of which, the respective plenipotentiaries have signed the present treaty and have thereto affixed the seal of their arms. Done in four copies at Paris, November 6, 1885. ARRANGEMENT RELATIVE TO THE EXECUTION OF ARTICLE 1 4 OF THE TREATY OF NOVEMBER 6, 1 885. The governments of France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, wishing to regulate by a special arrangement the execution of the clause of liquidation inserted in Art. 14 of the monetary treaty concluded between them on the present date, the undersigned, duly authorized to this effect, have agreed to the following provisions: Article i. During the year which shall follow the expiration of the treaty the respective exchange and return of the silver five-franc pieces exist- ing in equivalent quantities in the different states shall proceed. 290 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Art. 2. The accounts of coin retired shall be conducted : In France at Paris or Marseilles. In Greece at Athens. In Italy at Rome, Genoa, Milan, or Turin. In Switzerland at Berne, Basle, Geneva, or Zurich. Art. 3. Each one of the contracting states shall retire from circulation the silver five-franc pieces bearing the devices of the other states of the union. This retirement shall be accomplished October i of the year which shall follow the expiration of the present treaty. After this date all the silver coin above mentioned may be refused by the public treasuries other than those in the country emitting the coins. The state which shall continue to admit them cannot receive them except for its own private account and not for that of the state which shall have emitted them. January i of the following year, after the redemption has been effected, the account of coin retired from circulation shall cease according to nation- ality, in each one of the states, and reciprocal notification shall be given. The balance, if there exists one at this date, shall be kept by the state which holds the coin, at the disposition of the state which shall have struck the coin. This state shall retire its coins, redeeming them at their face value. Art. 4. The redemption stipulated in the preceding article shall be accomplished in gold, or in silver five-franc pieces struck with the stamp of the creditor state, or in bills of exchange payable in that state either in these same coins or in the bank notes having legal circulation there. This redemption may be divided into payments arranged in trimonthly periods so that the account shall be balanced in a maximum length of five years after the expiration of the treaty. These obligations can always be anticipated in whole or in part. There shall be made good on the sums to be redeemed i per cent, per year during the second, third, and fourth years and 1.5 per cent, during the fifth year. This interest shall be calculated from January 15, the day of the decree fixing the sum to be retired and, in case of the anticipation of the obligations, it shall undergo a proportional diminution. Art. 5. All expenses of transportation as well of the balance of silver coin to be returned as of the securities or coin destined to redeem it, shall be borne by each state as far as its own frontier. Art. 6. In partial derogation from the preceding provisions and for the purpose of taking account of the exceptional situation of Switzerland it is agreed : I. That the silver five-franc pieces emitted by France and retired from circulation in Switzerland shall be shipped by the federal government to the APPENDIX I 291 French government which shall effect their redemption from Switzerland under the conditions hereinafter determined : The French government shall reimburse successively at sight in Swiss silver coins of five-francs or in gold pieces of ten-francs and under, struck under the conditions of the treaty, and from the commencement of the vear which shall follow the expiration of the said treaty, all the shipments of silver five-franc pieces emitted by France and retired from circulation in Switzer- land, on condition that the amount of each one of these shipments shall not be less than one million nor more than ten million francs. The final bal- ance alone may be less than one million francs. The reimbursements to be effected in gold by the French government to the federal government for the retirement of French silver five-franc pieces shall not exceed the sum of 60 million francs. 2. That the silver five-franc pieces emitted by Italy and retired from circulation in Switzerland shall be remitted by the federal government to the Italian government which, from the commencement of the year which shall follow the expiration of the treaty, shall reimburse them successivelv at sight in Swiss silver five-franc pieces and in gold pieces of ten-francs or less struck under the conditions of said treaty, or in bills of exchange at sight on Berne, Basle, Geneva, or Zurich, payable under the conditions provided in para- graph I of Art. 4 of the present arrangement. The total of each of these shipments of Italian five-franc pieces shall not be less than 500,000 francs nor more than two million francs except the settlement of the final balance. The successive reimbursements to be made by the Italian government to the federal government ought as a general rule to be composed to the extent of two-thirds or less of gold coin and Swiss silver five-franc pieces and the remainder in bills of exchange under the condition determined in the pre- ceding article. If exception is made to this rule the proportion shall be re-established on the occasion of the following reimbursement. The Italian government shall not, however, be held to reimburse in gold or Swiss silver five-franc pieces to the federal government a sum exceeding a total of twenty millions and the total of reimbursements to be effected in coin and bills bv the Italian government to the federal government, for the whole of the operation of retirement and of exchange of the Italian silver five-franc pieces circulating in Switzerland, shall not exceed the sum of 30 million francs. Art. 7. The present arrangement shall be ratified and the ratifications of it shall be exchanged at Paris at the same time with those of the monetary treaty concluded on the present date between the four states. In evidence of which the undersigned have signed the present agreement and have affixed thereto the seal of their arms. Done in four copies at Paris, November 6, 1885. 292 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION DECLARATION. 1. The Hellenic government referring to the different stipulations of Art. 8 of the monetary convention of this date and desirous of giving on its side to the duration of the union all the guarantees in its power, makes the following agreement : So long as the cours ford 'i\i2\\ be maintained in Greece, the Greek gov- ernment will not resume the free coinage of silver. After the conclusion of the cours ford, it will not resume the free coinage without a preliminary understanding with France and Italy. 2. The Swiss federal government declares that the obligation stipulated in the second paragraph of Art. I2 of the monetary treaty concluded on the present date cannot be put into execution in Switzerland except in con- formity to the federal legislation on banks of emission. An official certificate of this reservation is given by the federal Swiss government. In sign of which the undersigned plenipotentiaries duly authorized to this effect have signed the present declaration which shall be considered as approved and sanctioned by the respective governments without other special ratification by the sole fact of the exchange of ratifications on the monetary treaty to which it relates. Done in four copies at Paris, November 6, 1885. ACT DATED DECEMBER 12 ADDITIONAL TO THE MONETARY TREATY SIGNED NOVEMBER 6, 1885, BETWEEN FRANCE, GREECE, ITALY, AND SWITZERLAND. The governments which signed the monetary treaty concluded at Paris, November 6, 1885, having agreed to leave to Belgium the power of re-enter- ing as a contracting party the union, reconstituted by this treaty, and the Bel- gian government, desiring to profit by this power : The undersigned, duly authorized to this effect, have agreed on the following provisions : Article i. The Belgian government adheres to the monetary treaty signed at Paris, November 6, 1885, between France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, as well as to the declaration and to the arrangement which are thereto annexed. On their side, the governments of France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland make record of the adherence of the Belgian government and give their assent thereto. Art. 2. The National Bank of Belgium shall receive the silver five- franc pieces during the duration of the treaty as it has been determined for the Bank of France by Art. 3 of the treaty. APPENDIX I 293 Art. 3. The quota of silver coin of two-francs, one-franc, fifty-cen- times, and twenty-centimes which can be struck and emitted by Belgium under the conditions of Articles 4 and 9 of the treaty is fixed at 35.8 million francs. The amounts already emitted up to this time by the Belgian govern- ment shall be subtracted from this sum. As an exceptional measure, Belgium is authorized to fabricate coins of these denominations up to the amount of five million francs by means of the silver five-franc pieces which she will recoin. Art. 4. In partial derogation from Articles 3 and 4 of the arrangement annexed to the Treaty of November 6, the following arrangements are agreed to by way of compromise : If, on the date of January 15, indicated in paragraph 3 of Art. 3 of the said arrangement, the French government finds itself, after the compensation has been effected, the holder of a balance of Belgian silver five-franc pieces, this balance shall be divided into two equal parts. The Belgian government shall be held to the reimbursement of one-half of this balance conformably to Art. 5 of the arrangement. It engages itself not to intro'duce into its monetary regime any change which can hinder the return of the other half by way of commerce and the exchanges. This agreement shall have a duration of five years from the expiration of the union. Belgium can put an end to this by accepting the obligation of reimbursing this second half under the conditions provided by Art. 4 of the arrangement. In every case, the Belgian government reserves to itself the power of introducing into its monetary legislation the changes which may be introduced into the French monetary legislation. The Belgian government guarantees that the balance shall not exceed 200 million francs. If there be an excess, it shall be reimbursed under the conditions provided by Art. 4 of the arrangement. In case the Belgian government should, on the contrary, find itself at the time of the dissolution of the union the holder of a balance of French silver five-franc pieces, the French government reserves to itself the power to demand from Belgium the application of the agreement stipulated in the present article. Art. 5. The French and Italian governments reserve the power again to demand the enforcement of the provisions stipulated in the preceding article for the regulation of their reciprocal accounts at the moment of the dissolution of the union, the maximum of the balance being fixed between them at the same figure of 200 million francs. Art. 6. Belgium undertakes to reimburse to Switzerland, successively, at sight, in Swiss silver five-franc pieces, or in gold pieces of ten-francs or less, struck under the conditions of the treaty, from the commencement of the year which shall follow the expiration of the aforesaid treaty, all the 294 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION shipments of silver five-franc pieces emitted by Belgium and retired from circulation by Switzerland. The amount of each one of these shipments shall not be less than one million nor more than two million francs ; the final bal- ance alone may be less than one million francs. The reimbursements to be effected in gold or in Swiss silver five-franc pieces by the Belgian gov- ernment to the federal Swiss government for the retirement of the Belgian silver five-franc pieces shall never exceed the sum of six million francs. If the balance to be liquidated shall exceed the sum of six million francs, Belgium engages herself not to introduce into her monetary regime any change of such nature as would hinder the return of the said excess by the way of commerce or the exchanges, during a period of five years after the expiration of the union or during such a period as shall be agreed between France and Belgium for the same purpose. Art. 7. In case of the dissolution of the union the liquidating books to be opened for the execution of the arrangement annexed to the Treaty of November 6, 1885, shall be conducted in France at Paris, Lille, Lyons, or Marseilles ; in Belgium at Brussels or Antwerp. Art. 8. The present act, additional to the monetary Treaty of Novem- ber 6, 1 885, shall be ratified and the ratifications shall be exchanged at Paris at the same time with those of the said treaty. DECLARATION OF DECEMBER 12, 1885. At the moment of proceeding to the signing of the act additional to the treaty signed between Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, November 6, 1885, the undersigned plenipotentiary of his majesty the king of the Greeks, declares that his government reserves to itself the right to demand in favor of Greece, when the forced circulation shall be abolished in that country, the proportional application of the provisions agreed on between France and Belgium in the additional act for the regulation of their recip- rocal accounts at the time of the dissolution of the union. An official certificate of this reservation is given by the undersigned plenipotentiaries of Belgium, France, Italy, and Switzerland. PROTOCOL. At the moment of proceeding to sign the monetary treaty concluded on the present date between France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, the under- signed plenipotentiaries of the president of the French Republic, his majestv the king of the Greeks, his majesty the king of Italy, and of the federal council of the Swiss Republic have, in the name of their respective govern- ments decided and agreed on what follows : In case Belgium shall not adhere to the monetary treaty signed on the present date between France, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland, each one of the APPENDIX I 295 high contracting parties reserves to itself, if it shall judge it to be necessary in the interest of its citizens, the power to admit into the public treasuries and to receive in the banks of emission the Belgian silver coins of five-francs during a maximum period of three months dating from the expiration of the Treaty of November 5, 1878. It is likewise understood that for the return of these said coins by the natural way of the exchanges, each one of the high contracting parties keeps its full and complete liberty of action. In case one of the governments of the union, either directly or by the agency of the banks of emission, shall make an arrangement with the Belgian gov- ernment or with the National Bank of Belgium for the return home of the Belgian silver five-franc pieces, this arrangement shall be presented for the acceptance of the other states of the union. In default of agreement, the other states of the union shall have with ref- erence to the state which shall have concluded the arrangement in question, the right of choice between the said arrangement and the clause of liquida- tion stipulated in Art. 14 of the monetary treaty signed on the present date. The present protocol shall be considered as approved and sanctioned by the respective governments without other special ratification by the sole fact of the exchange of ratifications on the monetary treaty to which it relates. Done at Paris in four copies, November 6, 1885. ARRANGEMENT OF 1893. Article i. The French, Belgian, Greek, and Swiss governments under- take to retire from circulation the Italian silver coins of two-francs, one-franc, fifty-centimes, and twenty-centimes, and to remit them to the Italian govern- ment which on its side undertakes to receive them back and redeem them according to the conditions fixed by the following articles. Art. 2. Four months after the exchange of the ratifications of the present arrangement the public treasuries of Belgium, France, Greece, and Switzer- land, in contravention of Art. 6 of the treaty of November 6, 1885, shall cease to receive the Italian subsidiary coins. Art. 3. The period fixed by the preceding article shall be increased by one month for the fractional coins (silver) coming from Algeria and the French colonies. Art. 4. The fractional Italian coin retired from circulation shall be placed at the disposal of the Italian government in sums of at least 500,000 francs and carried by each of the other states to a running account bearing inter- est. This interest shall be at the rate of 2.5 per cent., beginning from the date when the communication that the coin is placed at its disposal shall have been addressed to the Italian government. The interest shall be at the 296 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION rate of 3.5 per cent, from the tenth day following the shipment of the coin up to the date of actual payment or the receipt of the securities furnished by Italy. Payment in all these cases shall not be put off beyond a period of three months from the date of the shipment. Each reimbursement shall consist, to the extent of at least une-half, of the gold pieces struck under the conditions of the Treaty of November 6, 1885. The surplus shall be paid in bills on the creditor countries ; the maturity of these bills not to be later than the period fixed by the preceding paragraph. Art. 5. The transmission of fractional coin and of the securities shall be effected directly between each of the governments of the union and to the Italian government. None of the shipments demanded by the Italian gov- ernment shall exceed the sum of ten million francs. The French gov- ernment alone shall receive the demands for shipments made by the Italian government and it shall furthermore, the same as the Italian government, be informed by the other governments of the amount of the retirements effected by each of them. It shall be its duty whenever a demand for coin shall be addressed to it by Italy to apportion the amount among the other states according to the retirements acknowledged by each of them. Three months after the expiration of the periods provided for in Articles 2 and 3 the French government . shall make known to the Italian government the total amount of the fractional Italian coin which shall have been retired from circulation.in each of the states of the union and in the French colonies. Art. 6. The Italian government undertakes to effect the delivery and carry on the reimbursement of a minimum of 45 millions of francs of its fractional coin during each of the trimonthly periods which shall follow, until the complete exhaustion of the quantities whose amount shall have been specified according to the terms of the preceding articles. Immediately after the reimbursement of the value of a shipment made at the request of the Italian government, that government may demand a new delivery. Art. 7. When the Italian government shall have taken back and reim- bursed to the other states the total amount of the subsidiary coin which shall have been retired and sent it, it shall cease, contrary to the provisions of Art. 7 of the Treaty of November 6, 1885, to be obliged to take back from the public treasuries of the other states the fractional silver coin which it has emitted. Art. 8. Regard being had to the special needs of the monetary circula- tion of Switzerland, the federal government may, during the first four months which shall follow the exchange of ratifications of the present arrangement, remit to the Italian government according to the conditions fixed by Art. 4 a sum of 15 million francs of subsidiary coin, chargeable upon the minimum of 45 millions of francs provided for in Art. 6. The federal government shall. APPENDIX I 297 nevertheless, participate in the divisions effected in the execution of Art. 5 in the proportion of the retirements which it shall have effected over and above the sums remitted in accord with the preceding paragraphs. Art. g. The Italian government shall designate those of its treasuries to which the shipment of subsidiary coin shall be made. All the expenses of transportation and others resulting from the present arrangements shall be at its charge and carried to the debit of its running acccount with each of the other states. The adjustment of this account shall take place July i and January i . Art. 10. By application of Articles 4 and 7 of the Treaty of November 6, 1885, the Italian government cannot refuse those coins whose,weight shall have been reduced by wear. Art. II. The quotas to which the earlier treaties have limited the coin- age of subsidiary silver coin are expressly maintained. Art. 12. The Italian government, to obviate the exportation of its subsidiary silver coins, having considered that it had a right to have recourse, under the head of an exceptional and temporary measure, to the emission of treasury notes of a value less than five-francs, it is and remains understood that, regard being had to the stipulations of the preceding article, this emission ought to have, as counterpart and as pledge, the deposit in the Italian treas- ury of an equal amount in subsidiary silver coin. The amount of the sub- sidiary coin thus placed on deposit as security shall be always equal to the amount of the treasury notes in circulation. Art. 13. The provisions of Art. 11 of the Treaty of November 6, 1885, are applicable to the emission of treasury notes and to the deposit of sub- sidiary coin destined to serve as pledge for these emissions. Art. 14. When the public treasuries of France, Belgium, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland shall no longer be obliged to receive the Italian subsidiary coin, each of these three states may prohibit its importation. Art. 15. Beginning with the promulgation of the present arrangement, the Italian government may thereafter prohibit the export of its subsidiary coin. Art. 16. Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty of November 6, 1885, remain applicable to the subsidiary silver coin admitted by France, Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland. Each of the four states shall always have the right to demand, under the conditions of the present arrangement, the retirement and shipment of its subsidiary silver coin which is found in Italy. Art. 17. The Italian government reserves to itself the right to demand ultimately that the provisions of Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty of Novem- ber 6, 1885, shall be again applicable to the subsidiary Italian coin. But this cannot take pffice save by the consent of the four other states. Art. 18. In case that, the Treaty of November 6, 1885 being renounced, 298 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION the dissolution of the union shall take place, Art. 15 of the present arrange- ment shall alone be applicable, and the obligation imposed on each state by Art. 7 of the aforesaid arrangement to redeem within one year its subsidiary silver coin shall again be put in force. Art. ig. The present arrangement shall be ratified, the ratifications of it shall be exichanged at Paris as soon as possible, and at latest by January 30, 1894. In evidence whereof the plenipotentiaries have signed the present arrangement and have affixed thereto their seals. Done in five copies, November 15, 1893. TREATY OF OCTOBER 29, 1897. The president of the French Republic, his majesty the king of the Bel- gians, his majesty the king of the Greeks, his majesty the king of Italy, and the Federal Council of the Swiss Confederation having recognized the scarcity of fractional silver coin in the circulation — a scarcity due among other causes to the disappearance of a great number of these coins, to the constant growth of small transactions, and to new needs resulting from the increase of the population and to certain colonial extensions : Have resolved to conclude an additional treaty to increase the amounts fixed by Art. 9 of the Treaty of November 6, 1885, and by Art. 3 of the addi- tional agreement of December 2 of the same year in a manner such as to put these amounts into harmony with the actual number of the population and to increase them furthermore at the rate of one franc per capita. Article i. The quotas of subsidiary silver coin fixed by Art. 9 of the Treaty of November 6, 1885, and by Art. 3 of the additional act of December 12 of the same year are increased : For France, Algeria, and the Colonies, by 130 million francs. For Belgium by six million francs. For Italy by 30 million francs. For Switzerland by three million francs. Art. 2. The high contracting parties undertake to employ exclusively silver five-franc pieces of their respective issues for the manufacture of new fractional coin. However, each of them may include in sums agreed upon in Art. 1, a coinage of bullion to the amount of three million francs upon condition of establishing, with the profit resulting from this operation, a reserve fund to be used for the betterment of its monetary circulation of gold and silver. Art. 3. The arrangement of November 15, 1893, will be applicable to new silver coins which the Italian government is entitled to issue after the present additional treaty has been put into operation. APPENDIX I 299 Art. 4. The Greek government resigns the right to cause the coinage of new issues of fractional silver until such time as it shall have been able to take with regard to its monetary allies the same responsibilities which Italy has undertaken for her fractional coin by the act of November 15, l8g3, or analogous arrangements accepted by all the high contracting parties. Art. 5. The high contracting parties undertake not to cause the coin- age of the amounts fixed in Art. i above, except to a maximum amount of two-fifths of this during the first year and one-fifth in every succeeding year. The annual amounts which are not taken up may be added to the sums for the subsequent years. Art. 6. All other arrangements, both those of the Treaty of November 1885 and of its supplements, as well as the additional treaties of October 12, 18^85, and November 15, 1893, are and remain expressly maintained. Art. 7. The present additional treaty shall have the same duration as the treaty of November 6, 1885, of which it shall be held to be an integral part. Art. 8. The present additional treaty shall be ratified, and the ratifica- tions of it shall be exchanged at Paris within a period of three months, or sooner if possible. In evidence, the respective plenipotentiaries have signed the present treaty and have affixed their seals. Done in five copies at Paris, October 2g, 1897. PROTOCOL ADDITIONAL TO THE MONETARY ARRANGEMENT CON- CLUDED NOVEMBER 15,1897, BETWEEN THE FRENCH, BELGIAN, GREEK, ITALIAN, AND SWISS GOVERNMENTS. The Italian government, having decided to prohibit the export of Italian fractional silver throughout the whole duration of the monetary union of which Italy, with France, Belgium, Greece, and Switzerland, forms a part, in conformity, however, with the power reserved to it by Art. 15 of the arrange- ment of November 15, 1893, and having furthermore resolved to introduce no change in its monetary regime during the five years which will follow the expiration of the union, by which the return of the Italian fractional coin through the ordinary channels of commerce or exchange could be hindered ; the French, Belgian, Greek, and Swiss governments have agreed with it that, in consequence, Italy shall" be freed from the obligation, contracted with regard to them, of redeeming within one }-ear subsequent to the expira- tion of the Treaty of November 6, 1885, those of its subsidiary coins which may be found in circulation within the territory of the allies. This obliga- tion, which is imposed upon her by Art. 7 of the aforesaid treaty shall not con- tinue binding upon her unless the Italian government shall not carry out its intentions as already herem indicated, or unless, in accord with Art. 17 of the 300 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION arrangement of November 15, 1893, it demand and obtain permission to enter upon normal relations to the union as to its subsidiary coin. It is understood further that, by way of reciprocity, the other states of the monetary union which may have redeemed from Italy their fractional silver, under the conditions mentioned in the second paragraph of Art. 16 of the arrangement of November 15, 1893, shall be likewise freed from the obliga- tion of redeeming, during the year following the expiration of the union, such of their subsidiary coin as may be found in circulation in Italy, provided that they have prohibited the exportation of their fractional coin to Italy at the same time that they effected this redemption, and under condition also that they introduce into their monetary regime, during the five years follow- ing the expiration of the union, no change of such a nature as would hinder the return of the said fractional silver coins in the course of trade or exchange. In evidence of which, the undersigned, duly authorized by their respec- tive governments, have -drawn the present protocol, power of ultimate ratifi- cation or rejection being reserved. X I — I Q W Cl, Ph < o s < H W z; o <; H X O en P5 o o O Q is 9 o " o . a u O o o u o o o oo O; Coo oooooooooooooooooooooooo oo NO TfO '!3-0OSO N 'ti-COOOOOOO ■^OCO OO '^■^^ L0J>.0\.Goo r-*cc « o ■^o o '-;^'-;^'-' r^t^^j^or^ •^ rn a^ r^ ro 1-1 _ O O unr^ON'^O'-" t~^ o o TOOOO t-iO U-, O lO o" co" oT CN~ 1^ o" ci rC oT -^ lo i-o cT Ln cT ofT -^ rC lo cqcO'-iro>-i-^ro<:>o>oio'-'Lno"^M -^d- oooooooooooooooooooooooooo ■^■^N OOO O O ^OOCO Ol TN ■^MOCO ■^"^■^■^N^o OCO IN r;M OOO lo^^ oco o^o t^» t-o o moo •- r^r^iJ-iONOi>.«-H o LorCo cfvoo"c> oTo .-TuS'-h" ■^c^'^^tCrC^i^M" Tfoo"'-rc>o''(^o'"Ln BO M o roaoLoo rn >-' coTj-'^r^o i^locno o i>.ooooo m i-n'^ ooooooooooo c ^ roo o^(^^Loo rnoioo t-i 2 o^ t-H^ o Tf (N_ sq_ 00 f^ t^ ^^ c> "^ a! o" cT Lo m" ci oT o*"oo*" i-T M h-i i-i Ln M o o o o o Os o^ t~n tT 0\ f^O vn i-i M o o o o o o o o> M-O ■^00 -^o d T]- •-H rr -^ IN i-o C?0*" M~ ON cT ^f cT rO oo N oo \o o o N w c^ ■rf ^-n^ r^oo o^o i-i M ro'^mox^oo o^o >-" (N rn -rt- \y^^ r^oo 0000000'-i'-''-'-t'-'-ih-.i-.i~.i-HrJ04OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOiOLOvriO ) ■^00 OCO OO ■^■^■^O ■«J"0 M O sO -^ M M ■^vD Ot^r^tN O M OM rOO * ^D COM x-^N o o f^i- o M or-^vO CI H-i ^o r^LocoioN o^N_ooo\w_vo^r^ ) \o i-H^o o^i-t o r^vD o ocxjLooio N onOvo r-*o^N ooo ^oo r^>-t '-' c?\r^ 1 HH Tr*;t-CTvrOu-it>W ■^r^CT.r^iON ''d-i-iOO O OO OO W^ W MCOvDCO Ov H vno o i>.cM mo o on^d Of^oooo j>.i-h o i>-vD '-1'-^c^o^";i'^(N^ "I?"^^ r ro c> cT vo" o" ^ li^ m" -^ o" o" cT m" n" cf « T}- fo M r^ONi>.Lnor^NO j>-cio n oo n rOMCOvD N <-• W 'd-O J>-CO O o o m -^^o Ol o ^^ '* u '. .*'*!! "-^w o C •■•■••••••■•••••;-„ OO o « , ; ; I I ; ; ; I ; ; ; ; , ; I ; ; I , ; , I . * cxD vo 00 [s* rC-^^ lO LO o re N O 00 O ro 0\ >-H ON m ono rC T? cfv o o o o o o o o o O I Q O o O^ I>. . M LO -^vO vO ON u-l W On ■ O OO rn CO Tf oo y o'^^no"' od" lo r^ i-i o 00 C '' '."'"'. ;!NO-d-,ONONt^CO>--fOi fe voco" fo - oo" >-''~ r-^ -"^ n" t^ >-i M ■ rn\0 O -^OO n-) OOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ■^30 IDO r^ ON ro OOvDOOO I>.r-*ONONOOL001\0 N ONnOnO t^ONi-H T)-i-i Tj-ONLOt^'^W t-t OOQOO IO30 OnOnnO OnJ>.loN -i^i-iCO O OnQ r^OOONO 1-1 Oni-hnO lam OnQO nD O OnOO nO nO On rOOO 00 f^ >-' O J>.nO •-< M t^OO O* !>■ ON OnOO iJ-> rO r^ r^ en N ID O O M M r^ONr^ON>-. COM ONi^-^t^i-^ro rots r^tn«-i •-fvoo J>.oo i>. « o g o u M u !z; w pel ooooooooooo OGOC^O-^WMNnOOON nO Tr>-OOND rOLrjtOONQ On rood cnTi-Cco ■^'-T c^odi-r ■^i-H QLOt-ivO OnOCn) ■^ 00 NLOO ONU-l'<:J->-i "-I N Tl- 0) I OO M M o o o o o ■Lr> u~, ir^ u~, O « ro O r; o O OO i^ rood" -^ I-" t^ <-■ « t^ O On I>. ro rC iri Lo Tj^ CO ooooo ooooo ^'^ ^^ ^^ u '. * ' ! ! '. '. '. '.'.'.'. '. '. " ! ! ' 1 r^ r^ ■<3- rC ro a OvO-^onon 2 u^r^focoo £ u^i/io'"c>ro OnQ i-h (N rO-^inO I>.00 OnO "-h « (^ rt ^y^\0 r^OO OnO >-i CO 0) '-'00 Ov 00 ■^ ■^ tT'^OO I>.C0 O^iOsD i-iOOOO r^ '-« M "-I Lo ■"i (NvDi-. r^vD M OsOO Tj-ON C? (N CO '-' 00 r^ IN ONvD 00 ■* r^ N c \r\ ^ -d-rn-^DOGo r^r^co Ovo 00 00 \o 10 r-* H ,- TTN W (NOOGO Ou-»0 i-" rOii CO On -^ '-' C0\0 00 CO '3- rri " u-iOO TT in T -^vD LO xn ■^ C^ CO CO ■^ r^ N cr»>-' *-< r^sOO o^noLDLo M CO r^ loco 0) ^ MtNM>-H(^t-«cON C^ '-< N 1-1 w->oo Lo r^ Ov rC n r-^M hH r^c^i^co LTih-i ro £ \Cr rC cji ro 00" 0" n" i-T kh" (N I-" "I -1 i-i 1-1 0000000000 . Lo ■^ao r^oLnr^ra-i-'i-i • C L^l,_l,_,(V-)C^^O^'-l^^'-'U-^ ■ ;-{ u^oi'-«\o'"LnoravNco"fO ' I_l « c unc^rihHXio^Loowo^ >!: n t^lNHHUiDO-^O^vomO b oor^Mr--(N-^"^^'-' 00 t-i -^ "^ "^ C*-jO CO tt 000000000000 ■ -oooooo 00000 o^oo^o ■^O'ooo ■^■^000 000 TT -^ ■^ "^ r^oooo ON'-' u-io) u-i onoo 30 ON CN CO '- N !>. 0\ -^ -< « n a coo tTu^-^OnO OnO u~. ■^O h- M ondo r^ m 0\ N voO li: Rl 0^\OsD -TfsD r^rrr^CN COi-i CO o; "^ ■-_ r^ t--. \0 IJ-l TTvO la GO ^ ro t-* ONCO (N ]>. Tf ■^ -^-jD "1 CO 1-1 30 10 "^ W r^ 'TJ-GO W to LO ro ii'-iC^i-'Ol'-'MN N CO r^ u-}00 W C^ "H M '-' u B a fe -00000000 . . ■ u^ O^^OOOLOOVO 00 ■^u-i'-i f-«30i>.r-.. i>. CO m5"cn ■^r^roi-' ttOn 00 '-' rOGO N tN OM» ^ LTi ■<:f Tj- M CO r^ .000000000 00 00 • • • • 000000000 •(i m CO >J^ 0^ r^\0 -jD "~1 "^ a 0" M ■^0"'- i-" '-' ^ ^ ^ !>! cT C7\ CO 0" t ■* r^ r-^oo u-i "-H >-i CO "^ oc %o 00 00 N C3 LO ON COvD -H W !>. W CO 0^ I ta I-. TT .-1 n 4) >-> M rO'^t^O i>.CO 0^0 '- 01 co-^u^^O r^oo O'C -■ M CO'^ioO X-^00 OnO \0■^^o^o^o^o^D^o^^o r^r^r^t^r^r^i^r^r^ r^oc 00 X OO2O0O3OCO00COGOGC X cc DC UC ex. JC JC 00 oc uc oc 1 304 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION P O O o g o u o w ooooocooo IN CN^vO rOTt-Tl--^0\ g TT "U CT>00 O VT) m rOsO f** rC 'fl- o" oioo' w" t-T rCoo" w lo o — N r^ m •-. -. N w ooooooooo n woo ■^"^■^TTO o oT ■^ ro o" vo" oo" cf^ O*" i-T g(N "--I Tr>-iOor^(N ON ^ r^'^o'dvioo'i-rrCliri ^H Lo o o w r^ w M M M HH 1 o o o o" o o o o o o o o o o OnO^OnOnOnOnOnO^On COCOOOGOOOOOOOOOOO Pi w OOOOOOOOi^O oqqqqooqr^io in d lA o Lo uo uSco ^ On u20 O O roONOO u-iOnOnQ 2 o\ rC o^ oT vjD cT ON ^" rC in tt-< '^wi>.'-'30 mONOvoocooo ■. o -^ r^ ^ "^ "^ u '. * ' 1 1 * ! CT'nD QO H M moo n I ;■;;.. ro fooo b c^ rn o tN ■* M ro in CO en mo mo mmmo mo C» O O ro OnOO m O i-< On t^r'ir-.N mr^M o mON J5 ON t-^ ON n" no" m" ON rC en m" CONt-Hl>.mh-( T|-NW ooo rt ro ON OnX) OO 00 ■^C» (^ '-'^ Cb i-T i-h"oo' rn CO "J t-n" n" "N" d^ APPENDIX 11 305 w o < g o o ffi o w OLfio OLou-imo OLoo LT-o ou^LOLOLoo OLnLo>j". 10 u^o^lO>J^OLnLooo^-o^>.c^^1lJ^or--.OI>.'-ooo^r^?^i>.ooo^^c^^N^^ t-H f^M ■^O O^roi-H^OvO Ov\£) I>.0\0 r-^O r^i-« rooo (^r^(3'^Lnr*^'c3-oOJ>- H mLrjr^'a-r^vD ■^t-i r^-^a-r^M i-ioo r^o n rj-u-io ro>-i cs Oloi-i r-^co o\r*-)'-' 01 -^r 10 L0\0 roo mmc^, i-H C^ i-hO 000 >-i r^Ov uiso 01 TTtO"-! 0\"!3-'~« WHHl-l HHI-4 MWh-IK^CSl-lh-lM M B d 8 s :::::::::;:■ ; ta '..'.,..'...'.'.'..'.'.'.', V a oo^no Lovoi-ooo'-'^o'j^oO'-oLni-nu^oooi-OLou^io COO*^-!*- '-'ooONWW^r-.N'-'-.a-r^iOMtNr^NrD^'^Mn c Moovoor^ r^rj-ooocorOLnO'-O'-HO'Orooor-^roO'd-rno r^Oi-iCO , , , . ' '(N.-iI>.^u-iI>-i0200asU-, OvOMMfNOr-ONTjo ■-itN Lni-i '-ilNOl'-Hroa^OOO^O'^CNIvOMD 1^,00 t-tt-i.-.MM'-irONNW 000000000 .0000000000000000000000 s LTiOtnoLoOLoioo -i-oiomo ololow^o ololooioo o»j^o s t^rCTj^rCor-^r^Nu^i-i oo"cr^'-'Or^c>rC'^'-.cia^ 1000" rC o" 0" s, KH ooo^D^r^ .'-'M fDr<-, co^^^N■^LOLo^^woO'^r^^O(^c^ TfLOC^NON<-iM-OOt-io]OuO'-i-iO-"0>J^'-^, 0^rO o^o o^c^Lo^>.^>.o colon low t-^i- loo uoo w 00 e 5 0" 00" CI 00' N c>) 0" -^ 6" N o^i- LOO c^o i>.»^r^o loqoo m m tj-w lt.ixd r^ Em iNiO0\I>.0 'd-J>. •-' ONOo 'd-r^ror^r^u-iTTO ^n ^(^mooovO ts. Lo Tj-co r^ roco vjd f^ roo >-irot^r^OonO'NTro^'^'^wt^\D — r^it'- l-l M M N N !-« t-« coooM cj oco (S 00000 ■^o Tj-Nvoooo tto -^o woooso 00000 N 00 ,-■^0^0 >-> M rr^'-< r^o'"r^o roo'""Tr-^';rr^cf^o>ro»-rN'"ocrM"^oo liu-ir-^M "-I mtriM ^30 moo rnoo u-)0^o^^oo^^^-l0v0oo »nroooo r^o B 2 C^t-t ■^O^oO'-' mr^ro >-< '-' t-.j>*0\oot>*rn « i-OLOO >J^O lOLOiOO VOO u^LOO LOO LOO LOLOO LOLOLOLOO 10>J~>0 Ta-i-« rn(\i 00000 rOT^■<:}-0^0^00 •-« O^Lo^O^^'-• 00 \r\ >- 0\ !-• ONOl M •^^ N •-• tTN ■^^O W u^N COr^O ■^Ovror^OO TTrO'S-O '*>-< <^ rr^ ir^ O iiOO "~i uOO 01 '-' l>.(Mr^OO ■^00 rOTfO-^'-' in ^ ~iOO M BMoi'-'rjoimoi'-'ooocorfov ■^o r^ ■^ ^ i>.o t^,oo rn'3-c^o^o N rn t-i >- « '^j-o o*o^^^^^o^ r-^o >-• o o^o r^'d-cnioco j>.Loi-iOo n roTrioooLOM EntN T3-0 (y^ >-* -^"-lO r--«3-"^N 000000 >- MOO o^^-c^oo rOT^t-Tj-H.! mii o« (Sl-lh-. M hHHH.-.(N.-._C^ i-< v01>.00 O^O <-< N rO-^LOOr^OO O^O >-* M ro-^Loo r^oo O^O •-■ W ro-Tl-iOO r- 0000'-''-'-''-''-'«-''-'>---''-'MNWMN(NMMWC-ir^rn(^rn'^. -^^ ooro 0O0000000CCX)0000000000000O0000000000CO0O0000COGO00000O0000X)0000 3o6 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION 1 iri O O O O ' M o Lo tn o g f^ r--. u^ c S c^ x-C Lo t w O 30 O Os I » Lo cn \noo »jooo r^ u^ -d- i-i oo rooo o^ r^ >0OO0 mu^LOO) i-H 0\CN O N OOOCXJ'-h i-h CJi "* On OOO I-^ O CTi O t^O 0\ O O fO f iJ^ CS 00^ M 0\ M 01 LTi -^ X^ fO OI Ol oo t^ "^ "^ rC OS T? CO o^co ^ 11 (N O ooo -oooooooo .ooo -oooo -^OTr-WWOOOOMOOO -wo-^-owoo 3 ••inoos- C3VVJD ONOr^-Mr^ro -Lor^r^ -r^Mwo a t-^DOO ■vO'-''^'^MI>.rO>-< -OOOvO'OO^OO a , o^CT^HH ■^^u-l*j-^oooo^^J*l•^>.Ln^^•^-lr^l'^o tt^ll^']"'*)'" osoo^'ovxrc^c>r ocT O ^^ "^ ' o a^ !>- 'fO^^OO ; OTr'Trcoi>.o\0"<:fWO 'i-ir^oo '^i-sor^Tj- m\o H-ico Mi-«Mt^ov .u-ir^ u-iOOOLOiOOO N0LnO0iCNU-)O O O LTl wu-iiriLoo ooo roo r^o O nOLnTj-cnosi>*"^'^fOo on « o^ — ^ ^o^ o^oo o^ ►-^^ M QO inoo (in Ln>^so"rod'^>-no\i-rroo M c^rO'^rorofOrO'<^r^ > -J U w o g o u o ^; Pi fctH oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo O o "j~jO O o Lo>-'~ii-no O LnO i-ou-io O lOO LotJio oint-nuiiomo i-oo O wroc^'-'OOr-^vOvOO 'd-ONI>.r^i-i I>.i-«Lnr^c>N 0~i ■^j>-tN oioo oo '-' -> ojio rrii-nj>.wooi>-o j>.w i>.ro-oi>.oo\M (Nco cnco"-" o*-" ovi-i n r^ovcN mt-i m Tuir-^r^r^osN o £ co»*" n" 6 cT Lnco" oT x>i ■^oo" "-Too" 30" i-To" o" o 00 in 0^0" o" tr^ciooo u^vo 00" uo -^ d" 1-1 Tj-oo i-ij>.M ■-^oNcoTft-i 1- 0(Nr^T:ho r^j'-' i>.ooj>.r^\o .I>.00 J>.vDQOO NOO cnO Oi-O^O w '^>-OrOM vo n ONr-^>-i o M ooo^^o '-' cs LTiT^fo t^o loo^l-" Ov^o r^cc r^o mr^'-i >-OJ>.rOOO rO'^'-i u-no I>.N >-ni/^ONOsOO OOO ltjM ■.'-' cnooof^od'^oo cs'rofCr^cTo'c'rroo'^'^f^cr «\o ■^i>-o LOCO osoo^o r^'^Noo r^i>.ooo loltico 00 r^roM r^ci p^^u^xD r^I>*J>-mLO\£J t-i -rt <>i mw rocs KH j>«x-^OOvO •-" O M i-t U-) T^OO o ^o o w w -^00 "^ c?^ •*0 O M O O OvD N 0\0 OvO'O NvOvO NOOOOOOO rOOO rO i-< vj- i-< \0 LTivD CO^D O O O^O roO'^D Tj-M I>.0O [flCG lOOiO-rO'-' M miOLOrOOl 01 *^CO i-i (NOO OOLr)l>. c r^ i-^ o I-T d\ 'i-co >-i" oT o" "^ >-H* c»" o^ rC oT o ■^ tn fC cT >^ rt OloOO -"S-N mO>^(M O l>.ONrOON\D r^f^^D TTr^ r^ O O 'O OnOO O-OO WOst^CM. t^WTT M'^'-i '^vO I O M Tl-OO N M ' Ln ■^CO O ro r^ ON w XT, LO DO CO CO r^co yo to f t3- ro M Lo m Cr, hM^'i-T GO i>.-,o o o oooino>JOLno oooLOLOLnoom \0 OsQnlocm O O ON'-OrO'^O 1-1 000 "S-Q OOO cf\ ovoo" LT) CO 1" d" ci "I cono" i-Tod ro lo tC rC roo" ONr--.uor^o '-' >-< Loroo ovlololoo i>.\0 com (MCOOOOOsMnOOCO'O^O''^ rOr^TT'-i OVOLOO O»J0O OLO Os ■* fo ** r-^o vo u-^co ^vO ■^000 -g- vj-i 10 o) o lood d" LO ON 1' o" ■«*^ t-i O OvOOOCO LONvO K^i-twi-iTj-1-.OvON 00 o^o "-< M ro-^TLovor-vOo 00 1 (N roTi-Loo r-*co 00 —< m ro'^voor^oo ov COrO'^'^'^'^'^'^'^'^'^'a-lOLOLOLOLOLOLniOLOLrjvOsDvOvOOsOsDvOvOO OOOOCOCOCOCOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOCOOOCOCOOOOOCOOOQOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOQOOO APPENDIX 11 307" o o o o O U-) to o vO O O' o LO 0^0 O fl i-TcxToo' o" £ to r^ (^ r- C-, O C» CO M -n^ v^ to to O OO O '-' OO N O; O r d hn' T? "-T O O vO ^O M o~ to in" o" i-T \0 r^ "^ t-t ■ to o •ej- to ■ -^00 o o o o o o o o O rn Tf o 'j^ O" ro to )-< o i-H o r^ od" Lo •* O N ■^ O to o oo to I Pi w > .J o g O U !zi o o o o to to o "J^ >-i oo CM 00 o^ to\o r^ O (N oo O' ON ro to (^ r-. -rr TT •-< "^ CT; too (N O to to c^ tt to ■^oo to -< M CN i-O O o o" "-Too' C> H 00 ro to *-i 2 !>■ "N CT- t^ oT -f^ to O On O rOsO O 0^ O HH oo r^oo "^ to to to l-H «]■.--» u .00 0\0 •-« M r^TftoOr^GO C^O '-' M ro-d-tovOr^OO o^ r^r^r^r^r^r^r^r^r^r^oooocociODOGOoosooooo c^c\o^CT'OOvoooo\ D03000300O0O0O0O000O0O0OXI00i0X)00DO3O0000000O0ODG0000QO000O O oo '308 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION B. ITALIAN COINAGE SINCE 1862. I. GOLD. Years 100 lire 50 lire 20 lire 10 lire 5 lire Total 1862 Lire Lire Lire 39,097,560 59,614,000 12,172,600 02,181,000 3,926,020 5,510,180 6,807,940 3,707,100 1,095,400 470,160 Lire 5.427.150 4.437-IIO . / Lire 984,150 2,039,680 Lire 39,097,560 66,030,450 12,172,600 68,705,190 3,926,020 5,525,830 6,807,940 3,707,100 1,095,400 470,160 186^ 5,150 1864 1865 1866 47,400 1867 1868 10,500 5-150 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 66,1-00 20,404,140 5,919,420 2,244,440 2,154,560 4,947,960 6,315,880 2,929,320 2,576,160 16,860,560 i39,4bo,i40 3,645,600 195,500 3,294,680 1,180,160 2,210,800 1874 5,919,420 2,244,440 2,154,560 4,947,960 6,345,280 2,929,320 2,590,660 16,860,560 139,523,040 4,067,500 322,100 i87t; 1876 1877 1878 1879 29,400 1880 i88i 14,500 1882 1883 1884 122,900 421,900 126,600 i88i; 3,294,680 1886 1887 1888 1889 116,900 106,250 2,433,950 1890 1,364,400 635,820 653,220 824,280 1,364,400 656,520 674,120 82,1,280 I89I 20,700 1892 1893 20,900 t8q=; 1896 t8q7 766,660 766,660 1898 Totals 850,500 258,700 413,105,660 9,864,260 3,023,830 427,102,950 APPENDIX II 309 ITALIAN COINAGE SINCE lii^— Continued. II. SILVER. Years 5 lire ilii [ lire 30 centesimi 20 centesimi Total 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 I87S 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887.... 1888 1889 1890 189I 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896.... 1897 1898 Totals. 1862-189 Lire 964, 435 601, 4,010, 2,351; 935 .845 760 Lire 123,896 1,669,360 9,038,290 14,184,368 5,107,982 Lire 602,440 26.323,405 14.003,434 11,062,009 8,611,152 8,000,000 19,976; 29,845. 36,000, 35,61 1-. 42,273, 60,000, 50,000, 31,951: 22,048 9,000, 20,000 230 780 195 920 935 000 000 715 ,285 ,000 ,000 8,281,588 5,718,412 7,000,000 9,000,000 697,546 4,302,454 15,000,000 1,994,580 6,095,352 16,304,648 31,593 364,637,025 1,595,632 2,739,218 Lire 407,524.00 3,729,335-50 5,183,201.50 12,816,257.00 19,661,809.00 8,356,945'00 1,252,452.00 311,960.00 5,635.00 119,153.50 Lire 360,773.20 2,471,425.60 3,874,472.80 120,127.60 173,200.20 84,458,746 93,034,033 51,844,292.50 7,000,000.00 2,098, 32,082, 31,298, 45,947, 35,852. 16,530, 1,252, 19,976, 29,845, 36,000, 35,611, 42,273, 60,000, 50,000, 31,951, 22,048, 9,000. 20,000, ,295.00 873-70 ,286.10 ,941.80 830.60 ,145-20 452.00 ,230,00 ,780.00 195.00 ,920.00 ,935.00 ,000.00 ,000.00 ,715.00 ,285.00 ,000.00 ,000.00 8,281,588.00 5,718,412.00 7,000,000.00 10,994,580 00 697,546.00 10,397,806.00 31,304,648.00 311,960.00 5,635.00 150,746.50 1,595,632.00 2,739,218.00 600,971,096.50 310 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION C. BELGIAN COINAGE SINCE 1832.' I. GOLD. Years 25 francs 20 francs 10 francs Total 18^2—1847 Francs 8,037,425 3,749,575 1,853,875 Francs Francs '37V,88o 633,270 Francs 1848 8,037,425 184Q . . 4,121,455 1850 2,487,145 i8';i i86d 1865 20,522,060 10,639,260 26,826,140 27,634,980 24,689,480 63,824,060 45,179,440 20,522,060 1866 10,639,260 1867 26,826,140 1868 27,634,980 1869 1870 24,689,480 63,824,060 1871 45,179,440 1872 187^ . 1874 60,927,000 82,685,060 41,393,640 118,121,400 51,108,000 60,927,000 1875 82,685.060 1876 1877 41,393,640 118,121,400 1878 51,108,000 1879-1881 1882 10,446,200 10,446,200 1883 i8q8 Total 13,640,875 583,996,720 1,005,150 598,642,745 ' Ibid., pp. 89 et seq. APPENDIX II 311 "1 •0000000 0000000 "^ r^ »J^ • Ln 10 00 ■^ 0000000 <^ tn rn oo • 10 IN C^ 00 N CO Lo M- -^ j>. r-* • "~i m r^ i-H NO M '-' — 1-^ r^ r^ CO 01 !-< rf On • Ol rovO u^ LO vD 00 I-. tN r^ r^ so 0^ cno rn vO 30 -^ •-« r^ X) -' ^o N \j~i Ov . ON i>. 10 iH rnyo M nO r'l CN) CnCjO "^ '-' >-( r^ i>.vD ■^ vO u-i . 'sT Cnv£3 iJ-1 lt] CN) LT) m 01 rosD rn 0\ li^ ro r«-) ^ -H --^ • m 1'''- On r^ 30 (^ w >- CO (S i-< N 1-. ■-1 ro cono m N 13 I w u o o 3 ij w B ts 00 o • ■ LO vri . 00 30 nO LT) ro . [>■ r^ . "M NO ' CO ro u-i ON 00 LnvO^ o" w o" nO X) ro • NO Tf • . ro . i "^ NO . M NO : ON LO CNl w" OnnTI . NO nO "^ On NnD 00000 o-" 000c 00 O^ O O nO^ O' CnT e-T oJ Lri ro Tj-\0 . ' "^ >-n r^ On i-i \ ONDNDr*^ r^JNO .-h" ■^00 00 ' ao i>. M , 00 u-^ r*-) • CO r^ ■^ oo r^ r^ ■ On O O' . m o ro 0000 \0 00 ONOO 00 c^ ■^ ■<*■ "-H NO r^oo ■Ln \r) iy~t o O O O O i-i t^CO >-< :C On O ■^ -^ 'd-NO rn ON 00" h^" o" no" c> f^ n" On^O '-' W ro N CO TT LOnD CO U-1 o >-« O O O Lo o (N w t-" r-* i^ r>.c» i>. CO >-• 10 c^" rC o" r^ NO Lnc» ^ i-< ' -rrX) CI CO ON M CO ■^ iJ-)\0 00 On O '-' CO ■^ lO r^OO On O -" PI CO tTOO On lOnO 1>00 On O i-" COrOrorOrOfOcO'^^"^^'^'*''^^'-0'-0>-Otriinu~iVi-i\0'^NDNOND r-*r^ 00000000aO00GO000030000O0000C»2O0O300000CO00COGOCOC»CO0000 312 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION o o o o o • o o . o o c 3 in o o o o o ■ o o . o o c > o o u-1 o »j-i in • so -^ • o o c D in ujOO^OOW ■ t-t CO . o o f > -^ ^ O t^ O t^ -O- ' \r\ Tt . o o r 5 I^ o rtLn-^O'^O^ .oo^ * vD -^ c D « H f^ w o o o c N 00 !-< t--. N c 3 -^ r^ O 1 O -" N TJ- O • Tj- r*-) •-• in o M B s : : : : o c • oo tt. ■ ■ ■ ■ 9 .... '. ^ in v i>. B o . . ■ . o cl c . . . ■ • vjD m ta : : : : vJD O . . o o . r o o in a m ^ o o r o B o r ro « (S o" o" c vO o c C^ in u o '"' • . M [X4 N N (N . o oo • 0^ o o" ^ ro « ta . ^ ro 00 o" !>. • ■ -l ri > N (T) -"S- tOvC r^ o '-' M \D r^oo or O ^ H r^ r^ t-^ r^ i> - I>.20 00 (X oo oo oc c 00 00 OQ M 00 00 00 00 l-H M 00 00 oc oc 00 oc APPENDIX II 313 D. GREEK COINAGE SINCE 1865. I. GOLD. Years 100 drachmas 50 drachmas 20 drachmas 10 drachmas 5 drachmas Total 1886-1875 1876 1877-1883 1884 1885-1898 Drachmas 7,600 Drachmas 9.100 Drachmas Drachmas 189,590 Drachmas 46,470 Drachmas 747,240 1,000,000 11,000,000 11,000,000 Total . . 7,600 9,100 11,747,240 189,590 46,470 12,000,000 II. SILVER. Years 5 drachmas 2 drachmas I drachmas 50 lepta 20 lepta Total 1866-1867 1868 Drachmas Drachmas 94,838 Drachmas 328,547 151,135 Drachmas Drachmas Drachmas 423,385.00 151,165.00 1869. 30.00 1870-1872 1873. . 1,678,862 1.802. 211 2,249,465 3,481,073.00 4,944,376.90 5,988,995.00 9,429,345-00 44,525.00 1874 2,250,286.50 444,625.40 1875 1876 1877 1878-1882 1883 5,988,995 9,429.345 44,525 500,000 800,000 300,000.00 200,000.00 1,800,000.00 1884-1898 Total . . 15,462,865 2,373,700 5,331,358 2.550,316.50 644,625.40 26,262,864.90 E. SWISS COINAGE SINCE 1850 LEGALLY CIRCULATING IN 18 Denomination I. GOLD COIN 20-franc pieces. II. SILVER COIN 5-franc pieces. . . 2-franc pieces. . . I -franc pieces. . . 50-centime pieces Totals Number of coins 2,550,000 2,126,000 5,700,000 10,600,000 8,400,000 26,826,000 Nominal value Francs 51,000,000 10,630,000 11,400,000 10,600,000 4,200,000 36,830,000 APPENDIX III. BIBLIOGRAPHY. I. CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE." Annales de I'Ecole libre des Sciences politiques. Paris. Annales de la Societe de rEconomie politique. Paris. Banker's Magazine. London. Bulletin des Lois de la R^publique. Paris. Bulletin de Statistique et de Legislation compar^e. Paris. Economiste Franipais. Paris. jfeconomiste Europeen. Paris. Gazzetta ufficiale del Regno d'ltalia. Rome. Giornale degli Economisti. Rome. Journal officiel de la R6publique franfaise. Paris. Journal des 6conomistes. Paris. London Economist. London. Monde Economique. Paris. Moniteur Beige. Brussels. Nuova Antologia di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Florence. Revue Catholique. Lifege. Revue contemporaine. Paris. Revue de Droit international. Brussels. Revue de France. Paris. Revue des deux Mondes. Paris. II. SOURCES. Conferences monetaires Internationales entre la Belgique, la France, I'ltalie, la Suisse et la Grece. Proces-verbaux. Paris, 1865, 1874, 1875, 1876, 1878, 1879, 1885, 1893. Rapport de la Commission chargee d'^tudier la Question monStaire. Docu- ments relatifs &. la Question mon^taire. Paris, 1858. Rapport d^pos^ par M. le Ministre des Finances. Chambre des Repr6- sentants (Seance du 20 aoOt 1859, Question mon^taire). Bruxelles, 1859. ' In the list of periodical publications given above no effort has been made to furnish exact references for all material used. Much of this material extends through- out a series of issues covering a considerable time. The precise citations have been furnished in the footnotes to the text of the monograph, and they are consequently dispensed with at this point. 314 APPENDIX III 315 Rapports a S. E. M. le Ministre des Finances au nom de la Commission chargee d'examiner la Question des Monnaies divisionnaires d' Argent. Paris, 1862. Documents relatifs a la Question mon^taire ; la Convention de 1865 ; Expose des Motifs de la Loi actuelle ; Rapports sur cette Loi ; Texte des Lois anterieures etc. Bruxelles, 1866. Rapport de la Conference Internationale de 1867. Paris. 1867. Conference mon^taire Internationale. Procfes-verbaux. Paris, 1867. Rapport de la Commission chargee d'^tudier la Question de I'Etalon mone- taire. Paris, 1867. Documents relatifs a la Question mon^taire. Proces-verbaux et Rapport de la Commission mon^taire de 1867 relatifs a la Question de I'Etalon. Paris, 1868. Enquete sur les Principes et les Faits g^n^raux qui r^gissent la Circulation monetaire et fiduciaire. Paris, 1867-1869. Proces-verbaux et Rapport de la Commission monetaire de 1868, suivis d' Annexes relatives a la Question monetaire. Paris, i86g. Rapport de la Commission chargee d'Studier la Question de I'Etalon mone- taire. Paris, 1869. Enquete sur la Question monetaire D^cembre 1869-Aout 1871. Paris, 1872. Documents relatifs a la Question monetaire recueillis et publics par i\I. le Ministre des Finances. Bruxelles, 1873. Conference institute pour I'Examen de la Question monetaire. Bruxelles, 1873- Compte rendu des Discussions de la Commission r^unie par M. J. Malou, Ministre des Finances, k Bruxelles, Octobre-Novembre 1873, pour examiner avec lui des diverses Questions mon^taires. Bruxelles, 1874. Rapport au Conseil federal Suisse sur la Conference mon6taire de Janvier 1874, par Feer-Herzog et Lardy. Berne, 1874. Rapport au Conseil federal Suisse sur la Conference de janvier-fevrier 1875 par Kern et Feer-Herzog. Berne, 1875. Documents relatifs k la Question monetaire. Recueillis et publies par le Ministre des Finances. 2" Serie. Bruxelles, 1876. Message du Conseil federal a la Haute Assembiee federale concernant les Conventions monetaires signees a Paris le 5 novembre 1878. Berne, 1878. Documents relatifs k la Question monetaire. Belgique. Chambre des Repre- sentants. Session 1878-9. 3' Serie. 1-7 fascicules. Bruxelles, 1878-9. Rapport de la Commission chargee d'examiner le Projet de Loi portant Appro- bation de la Convention monetaire et de I'Arrangement relatif a I'Execu- tion de i'Article 8 de cette Convention, signee k Paris le 5 novembre 1878, entre la France, la Belgique, la Grece, I'ltalie et la Suisse. Cham- bre des Deputes, Session de 1879, Session du 6 fevrier 1879. Versailles, 1879- 3l6 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Schweizerische Miinz- und Geldgeschichte von den altesten Zeiten bis zur Gegenwart. Bern, 1878. Mesures proposSes pour I'AVjolition du Cours iorc6. Expos^ des Motifs et Projet de loi. Rome, 1881. Message du Conseil f^d^ral k I'Assembl^e fdd^rale concernant la Ratifica- tion de la Convention mon^taire du 6 novembre 1885. Berne, 1885. La Circulation mon^taire de la France d'aprfes les recensements de 1868, 1878 et 1885. SociStfi statistique de Paris, Vol. 27. Paris, 1886. Circulation mon^taire et fiduciaire en France, en AlgSrie et dans les Colo- nies. Paris, 1887. Commission mon^taire institute le 30 Janvier 1886 pour I'execution de la Convention mon^taire du 6 novembre 1885. Systemes monStaires des diff^rents pays, i fascicule. Paris, 1888. Rapport de la Commission du Controle de la Circulation mon^taire pour I'Exercice 1888. Paris, 1888. Congres mon^taire international. Rapport sur I'enquete mon^taire anglaise. Paris, 1889. Congres mon^taire international tenu k Paris les 11, 12, 13 et 14 septembre 1889. Corapte rendu et Documents. Paris, 1890. Comit6 d'Etude de la Question mon^taire en Belgique. Rapport 1890. Anvers, 1890. Rapport de la Commission du Controle de la Circulation mon6taire pour I'Exercice 1889. Paris, 1890. Administration des Monnaies et M^dailles. Compte rendu pour I'Exercice 1 888. Paris, 1890. Rapport de la Commission du Controle de la Circulation mon^taire pour I'Exercice 1890. Paris, 1891. Institution d'une Commission permanente pour I'Etude des Questions mon6- taires. Bruxelles, April I, 1891. III. AUTHORITIES.' AlME-BoUTAREL : Enquetc sur la Circulation mon^taire et fiduciaire. 1865. Arendt, O. : Die deutsche Miinzreform und die Pariser Miinzkonferenz. Berlin, 1881. Bamberger, L. : Die Schicksale des lateinischen Miinzbundes. Ein Bei- trag zur Wahrungspolitik. Berlin, 1885. ■In giving the titles of some pamphlets mentioned in the following list, it has, in a few cases, been found impossible to furnish complete information as to place of publication, etc., either because such information was not afforded by these fugitive publications themselves or because the copies consulted were defective. Most of the writings mentioned are to be found in the Bibliothfeque Nationale, the library of the French Mint, or that of the Bank of France. Some have been obtained from other sources. APPENDIX III 317 Baudrillart, H. : Argent et ses Critiques. Paris, 1867. Berry, M. : Etudes et Recherches historiques sur les Monnaies de France. Paris, 1852. Quelques Vues sur TEmission d'une nouvelle Monnaie d'Or en Belgique. Bruxelles, 1859. Bonnet, Victor : Etudes sur la Monnaie. Paris, 1870. BuRCKHARDT-BlsCHOFF, A. : Bericht der schweizerischen Delegierten iiber die internationale Munzkonferenz im Sommer 1881. Basel, 188 1. Die lateinische Milnzkonvention und der internationale Bimetallismus. Basel, 1886. Cernuschi, H. : Le grand Proces de I'Union mondtaire latine. Paris, 1884. La Danse des Assignats mStalliques. Or et Argent. Paris, 1874. Les Projets mon^taires de M. Say. Paris, 1878. La Diplomatic mon^taire en 1878. Paris, 1884. Les Assignats m^talliques. Paris, 1885. Le grand Proces de I'Union mon^taire latine. Paris, 1885. Chanier, O. de : La Conference mon^taire de Paris. Paris, 1881. COLLOT, E. : De la Demonetisation de rOr. Paris, 1852. Campan, C. a. : La Question de I'Or en Belgique. Bruxelles, i860. Coquiel, C. de : La Charabre de Commerce d'Anvers et la Question de I'Or. Bruxelles, i860. COGEL . Cours legal de la Monnaie d'Or franijaise. Bruxelles, i860. CoSTES, H. : Notes et Tableaux pour servir k I'l^tude de la Question mone- taire. Paris, 1884. EsCHEil, H. H.: Die schweizerische Munzreform und ihr Schlussergebniss. Zurich, 1854. Feer-Herzog: Bericht der Mehrheit der nationrathlichen Munzkommis- sion — in Betreff der Munzfrage. Bern, 1859. L'Unification monetaire internationale : ses Conditions et ses Perspectives. Paris, 1869. La France et ses Allies monetaires en Presence de I'Unification univer- selle des Monnaies. Or ou Argent : ]£tude sur une Question k I'Ordre du Jour. Berne, 1873. Rapport k I'Union Suisse du Commerce et de I'lndustrie sur I'Etat actuel de la Question monetaire. Berne, 1878. Frere-Orban : La Question monetaire : Examen du Systeme et des Effets du double Etalon. Bruxelles, 1874. La Question monetaire en Belgique en 1889. Echange des Vues entre M. Frere-Orban et M. de Laveleye. Bruxelles, i8go. Haerne, de : La Question monetaire consideree en general et dans ses rapports avec I'Angleterre, la France, la Suisse et la Belgique. Bruxelles et Paris, i860. 3l8 HISTORY OF THE LATIN MONETARY UNION Halphen, L. : De la Demonetisation de I'Or. Paris, 1852. Haupt, O. : La Rehabilitation de I'Argent. Paris, 188 1. Histoire monetaire de notre Temps. Paris, 1886. The Silver Question in 1892. HouK, F. : La Question monetaire du Point de Vue pratique. Bruxelles, i860. Lamar, P. S. : Congres monStaire Internationale de Paris, Septembre 1889. Laughlin : History of Bimetallism in the United States. New York, 1897. Laveleye, E. de : La Question de I'Or en Belgique. Bruxelles, i860. Le Bimetallisme international. Bruxelles, 1881. La Question mon^taire en i88o et en 1881. Bruxelles, 1881. La Crise et la Contraction monetaire. Bruxelles, 1885. Leon, A.: La Convention monetaire du 23 Decembre 1865 et I'Uniformite des Monnaies. Paris, 1866. Leon, M. : La Convention monetaire du 23 Decembre 1865 et I'Uniformite des Monnaies. Paris, 1868. Liegeois, J. . La Question monetaire : ses Origines et son Etat actuel. Malou, J.: La Situation mon^taire de la Suisse en September 1859. Brux- elles, 1859. La Question monetaire en 1859. De I'Adoption de I'Or frangais. Brux- elles, i860. De I'Adoption legale de I'Or fran(;ais. Bruxelles, i860. Question monetaire. Bruxelles, 1873. Documents relatifs a la Question monetaire, recueillis et publics en fasci- cules. Bruxelles, 1874. Notice bistorique sur la Reforme monetaire en Allemagne. Bruxelles, 1879.- Meyer, G. . Die schweizerischen Miinzen von den altesten Zeiten bis auf die Gegenwart. Zurich, 185 1. Mannequin, Th. : Question de la Monnaie d'Or. Paris, 1857. Marsault, a.: Droit francpais de I'Unification des Monnaies. Paris, 1881. Matigny, H. de : De la Disparition de la Monnaie d'Argent. Paris, 1859, Menier, E. J. : L'Unite de I'litalon monetaire. 1873. Morel, A. : Etude de la Question monetaire h propos de la Brochure de M, Malou. Bruxelles, 1859. Noel, O. : La Question monetaire et I'Union latine. 1882. Parieu, E. de : La Question monStaire en France et k I'Etranger. Paris, 1866. La Question monetaire et I'Opportunite de sa Solution. Paris, 1866. L'Union mon6taire de la France, de I'ltalie, de la Belgique, et de la Suisse: Le Miinzverein latin. Paris, 1866. De rUniformite monetaire. Paris, 1867. La Politique mon^taire en France et en Allemagne. Paris, 1872. Interpellation relative k la Convention monetaire de 1876. Paris, 1876. APPENDIX III 319 Parieu, E. de : Proposition de Loi suspendant I'Emission des Bons pour la Fabrication des Monnaies d' Argent a 9-10 de fin. Paris, 1876. Les Embarras de la Question mon6taire en 1880. Paris, 1880. Pauliat, L. : La Conference monStaire de 1881. 1881. Prove, F. : De la Question de I'Or en Belgique. Bruxelles, i860. ROCHEUSSEU : Supplement a la Question monStaire en Belgique en 1889. La Haye, 1890. Rose : De la Question mon^taire en Belgique. Bruxelles, i860. RoswAG, C. : La Question mon^taire. 1874. Etudes 6conomico-industrielles. La Question mon^taire. 1874. Rozenraad, C. : L'Emprunt italien pour I'Abolition du Cours forc6. Paris, 1883. Say: Dictionnaire de I'Economie politique. Paris. Schneider, J. P.: Die Pariser Miinzkonferenzen von 1878. Bremen, 1879. Serrure, R. : La Monnaie en Belgique. Verviers, 1884. Soubeyran, G. de : L'Or, I'Argent et le Commerce beige. Bruxelles et Paris, 1 861. La Crise mon^taire en France. Paris, 1871. Question mon^taire. La Discussion k la Soci^td d'Economie politique beige, 16 Novembre 1873. Bruxelles, 1873. La Question mon^taire. Discussion a la Soci^t^ de I'Economie politique Beige. Bruxelles, 1874. L'Unit6 de TEtalon monStaire. Paris, 1876. La Question mon^taire. Lettres a M. Frere-Orban par un Economiste. Paris, 1876. Question monStaire : Discours prononc6 k la Chambre des Ddput^s. Paris, 1 88 1. Touze, C. le : La Question de I'Argent et les Conferences Internationales de 1881. Paris, 1881. White, Horace : Bimetallism in France. Political Science Quarterly, VI, 2,11 et seq. WOLOWSKI, L. : Enquete sur les Principes et les Faits g^nfiraux qui rdgis- sent a la Circulation mon^taire et fiduciaire. Paris, 1866. La Question mon^taire. Paris, 1868. La Question mon^taire. Paris, 1869. L'Or et I'Argent. Paris, 1870. INDEX. Accession, right of, to Latin Union pro- vided for, 53; right of, abrogated in 1874, 141 ji. Acte Additionnel, to Treaty of 1885, pro- vides for Belgium, 233; operation of, extended to other countries by a decla- ration, 234. Alsace, circulation of five-franc pieces in, 122. Alternating Standard, condemned in com- mission of 1867, 95, 96. Arendt, supports bimetallism in 1889, 241. Austria, desires to join Latin Union, 82; work of monetary commission in, 82, 82; declares for gold standard, 82. Banks, capital and reserves of, in Itah', in 1865, 65; circulation of Italian, 66. Bank of Belgium, difficulties of, due to alternating standard, 24; demands adoption of silver standard, 116; demands suspension of silver coinage, 117; undertakes to receive Italian coin 140; renevifs this agreement for 1875, 156. Bank of England, holdings of French coin by, 144. Bank of France, influence of, in formation of Latin Union, 58, 59, composition of reserve studied, 91, 92; urges bimetal- lism in Enquete of 1868, 104; author- ized to suspend specie payments in 1870, 109; refuses advances on depos- its of silver bullion, 121; undertakes to receive Italian coin, 138; increase of reserve of, in 1874, 147; history of notes of, 14S; reduction of circulation of, 148; favorable condition of, 145; renews agreement for 1875, 156; flow of gold to in 1875, 158; condition of reserve in 1876, 164; unwillingness of, to receive foreign coin lor notes, 172; fails in effort to force five-franc pieces into cir- culation, 174, 175; work of, in with- drawmg subsidiary silver, 199; fall- ing off of reserve causes alarm, 202; allows notes to become inadequate, 203; further decline in reserve, 204; improve- menfin condition of, 206; increase of ^old in reserve, 210; condition of, 242; investigates condition of subsidiary coin, 247; coin in, 260. Beernaert, indicates willingness to accept liquidation clause, 225; on monometal- lism in Belgium, 239, 240. Belgium, early changes in monetary sys- tem, 15; provisions of law of 1832, 15; changes in monetary system of, 15, 17; constituents of circulation of, 18; Dutch florins deprived of legal-tender quality in, 19; demonetization of gold in, 19; character of silver coin in, 20; ces- sation of coinage of silver in, 20, 21; 1832, 19; recurrence of alternating standard in, 23; peculiar position of, in monetary world, 24; hesitates to antici- pate action of France on subsidiary sil- ver, 34; suffers from invasion of foreign coin, 41; proposes monetary conven- tion of 1865, 41; attitude at Convention of 1865, 43; coinage in, for 1872, dis- cussed, 115; imports of silver to, in 1873, 116; loses gold, 117; increase of silver coinage in, 115; destruction of sil- ver coinage in, 117; movement of for- eign silver into, 122; monetary confer- ence called in, 123; coinage of silver suspended in, 125, 126; demands sus- pension of silver coinage by Latin Union, 133, 134; monetary controversy in, 145; coins silver for government 321 322 INDEX account, 150; increased coinage of gold in, in 1874, 152; allows issue of mint vouchers for 1875, 153; gold coinage in 1875, 159; attitude at Convention of 1876, 161; continues suspension of silver coinage, 167; at- tempts to limit legal-tender quality of silver, 170, 171; attitude of, at Interna- tional MonetaryConference of 1878,175; ratifies Treaty of 1878, 194; relation to Latin Union thoroughly discussed in 1885, 216; attitude of, at Convention of 1885, 2ig, 220; demands rejected at Convention of 1885,221,222; secedes from Convention of 1885,224; possible reason for secession, 228; controversy over relation of, to Latin Union, 228, 229; claims of, as to redemption, par- tially admitted by Leroy Beaulieu, 230; chambers receive explanation from delegates to Convention of 1885, 229; makes overtures to France, 230, 231; situation of, in case of secession, de- fined by protocol, 232; enters into ne- gotiations with France, 233; ratifies Treaty of 1885, 233; dissatisfaction of, with Treaty of 1885, 237; would ad- here to Latin Union, 245; holding of Italian subsidiary coin by, 248; condi- tion of circulation in, 261, 262. Bimetallism, first discussed in France after 1848, 8; arguments for, based on alternating standard, 8; unpopular, 1850-1860, 9; in Convention of 1865, 42; distasteful to smaller countries at Convention of 1865, 43; discussed at Convention of 1865, 45; why favored by Bank of France, 58-60; makes Treaty of 1865 unpopular, 73; favored by com- mission of 1867, 76, 85; influence of, in tliwarting international monetary uni- formity, 84; abandonment of, advocat- ed by committee on weights and meas- ures at International Exposition of 1867, 96, 97; new mode of argument adopted by supporters of, 98, 99; dis- credited by commercial bodies in 1868, 99, 100; advocated by haute finance and Bank of France in Enquete of 1868, 103; Latin Union, how hampered by, 143; declining prospects of, 173, 174; increase in strength of, in France, 201; in France, assisted by Italian loan, 207; Magnin, Parieu, and Soubeyran on, 208; injured by international monetary con- ference of 1881, 209; loses ground in Italy, 2 1 1 ; kept before people in France, 238; stimulated by monetary congress of 1889, 241; attitude of advocates of on silver bill in U. S., 243; urged in Italy, 243; decrease in support of, 252; not the present policy of Latin Union, 266. Bons de monnaie, defined, 126; issued in Belgium, 126; issued in France in 1874, 150; advance issue permitted by Belgium, Italy, and France in 1874, 153- Broglie, Due de, on conduct of Latin Union in 1874, 134. Bundesrath, work of Swiss, on monetary problem, 30, 31. Bundesverfassung, Swiss, of 1848, pro- visions on coinage, 26. Cernuschi, supports bimetallism at Con- gress of 1889, 241. Chailley, on relation of Belgium to Latin Union, 229. Chambres de commerce, verdict of for gold standard in 1868, 99, 100. Cheque, use of, in France, proposed by Saint-Andr^, 10. Chevalier, takes part in early French monetary controversy, 10; views on international money, 74; announces monetary commission, 75; resigns from commission, 76. Circulation, of France, discussed, 1-7; concurrent, not secured by law of 1803, 6; concurrent, not regarded as due to double standard, 8; of subsidiary silver deficient, 11; of Belgium prior to 1847 discussed, l6, 17; composition of Swiss, INDEX 323 27; composition of French, in 1868, 99; effect of single standard on, discussed in Enquete of 1868, 102, 103; of France, in 1870-1874, 147. Clapier, introduces bill in France limit- ing future coinage of silver, 160. Cleveland, influence of message of, 246. Cochut, on circulation of France, 256. Coinage, effect of suspension of silver, on price of silver, 86; in Latin Union dis- cussed, 87-90; for 1872 discussed, 115, 116; increase of silver, in France and Belgium, 116; restriction of silver, favored in France, 117, n8; limited in France, 117; of silver suspended in Belgium, 126;' during 1875, I57~IS9; of silver suspended in France, 164, 165; " right of free," definitely abrogated in France and the Latin Union, 197; free, when to be resumed, explained in Treaty of 1885, 232. De Colmont, evidence of, as to ratio, 4 n. Commission of 1858, appointment, ii; nature of work of, 11,12; recommenda- tions of, 12-14; how regardfed by con- temporaries, 14 n. Commission of i860, French, is given in- structions, 36; reports, 36; its sugges- tions not adopted, 36; effect of, on Italy, 36, 37. Commission of 1867, French, work of, 76, 77; verdict unsatisfactory, 76; minority report of, 94; report of, discussed , 95-97. Commission of 1869 (see Conseil Sup^- rieur), evidence of, as to nature of French circulation, 4 n. Compensatory theory, exploited by com- mission of 1867, 95. Conference, see convention. Conseil Sup^rieur, evidence before, on nature of French circulation, 4 n; ap- pointment of, 106; its work estimated, 106; outlined, 106; declares for gold standard, 107. Convention of 1865 (see Treaty of 1865), proposed, 41; reasons for, 42; composi- tion of, 42 n; attitude of different coun- tries at, 43, 44. Convention (International Monetary) of 1867, nature and composition, 77; work of, how affects Latin Union, 78; results of work of, summed up, 79, 80. Convention of 1874, demanded by Switzerland, 127; prospects for, 130; spirit at, 132; wider in scope than that of 1865, 133; possible courses of action open to, 138. Convention of 1875, renewal of Treaty of 1874 demanded by France and Bel- gium, 153; new demands of Italy at, 153; debates at, 154, 155. Convention of 1876, debates at, 160-162; attitude of France at, interpreted, 163. Convention of 1877, waived, 172. Convention of 1878, why important in history of Latin Union, 181; outcome of, easily to be predicted, 182; meets, 183; chiefly concerned with measures regarding Italy, 1S3; attitude of Italy _ at, regarding coinage of five-franc piece, 184; prerequisites demanded of Italy, 185. Convention of 1879, called in response to demands of Italy, 195; debates, 195- 197. Convention of 1885, meets, 213; nature of problem presented to, 216, 217; pos- sible courses of action, 217, 218; these courses discussed, 218, 219. Convention of 1893, called to meet needs of Italy, 246; discussed, 247. Convention of 1897, called, 250; work of, 251. Cours force established in Italy, 60; origin of, 67; effect of, on Latin Union, 69, 70; established in France, in 1870, 109; opinions of M. Malou on, 129; brought to close in France, 175; loan for conclusion of, in Italy, 205-207; bill for abolition of, introduced in Italy, 205; in Greece, 207. Declaration, see Acte Additionel. Demand, influence of changes in, on ratio of gold to silver, I, 2. 324 INDEX DemonetiEation, a possible remedy in French monetary system after 1848, 9. Denominations, of subsidiary coin dis- cussed at Convention of 1865, 51, 52. Depreciation, of silver, associated with year 1873, 114; of five-franc pieces, 121; hovi^ far due to Germany's action, 137. Doda, Seismit, on speculation in Italian subsidiary coin, 241. Dumas, urges reduction in fineness of subsidiary silver in France, 35; evidence of, as to ratio, 4 n. Duclerc, presents formal demands of France at Convention of 1885, 222. East, effect on Belgium of demand of, for silver, 25; demand of for silver does not decrease prior to i860, 33; continued drain of silver to, 39; in- creased export of silver to, 40; five- franc piece not necessary for trade v?ith, 102; decrease in demand of, for silver, discussed in 1874, 136. Edinburgh Review, favors international money, 75. Ellena, on free coinage of silver at Con- vention of 1885, 222. England, action of in 1816, how affects ratio, 2. Enquete (French) of 1868, appointed, loo; discusses international money, 100, loi; discusses effect of gold standard on foreign trade, loi, 102; discusses use of silver in interior, 102, 103; discusses liquidation of contracts in silver, 103; final recommendations of, 103. Escudo, discarded as monetary unit by Spain, 83. Exports, of gold and silver from France, 1-4, 6; of silver after 1848 cause satis- faction, 6; evidence of figures for, in Belgium, as to nature of circulation, 16; of silver from Belgium, 17; of gold and silver from France to Belgium, 21, 22; of gold and silver from Italy, 62-64; from France, studied, 90, 91; of gold from France, 201; of subsidiary coin from Italy, 246; power to prohibit, of subsidiary coin, granted Italy, 252; of silver from France, 265, 266. Federal Constitution, provisions of Swiss, on coinage, 26. Federal council, demands fineness of .8 at Convention of 1865, 48; communi- cates with France, asking for Conven- tion of 1874, 127. Feer-Herzog, shows that Treaty of 1865 did not sanction double standard, 44; declares against bimetallism at Conven- tion of 1865, 45; on monetary specula- tion in Switzerland, 119; report of, to Swiss Union of Commerce and Indus- try, 182; on new coinage of silver five- franc piece, 188; on duration of new treaty, 189; predictions as to future of Latin Union, 192. Fineness, of subsidiary coin reduced in Switzerland in i860, 32; by France in 1861, 40; by Italy in 1862, 36; dis- cussed in Convention of 1865, 47-49. Five-franc piece (gold), coinage of, sus- pended, 192. Florin, Austrian, deprived of legal-tender quality in Germany, 122; flows into Belgium, 122. Forcade, as minister of finance, institutes French Monetary Commission of 1861, 35, 36. Fortamps, discusses quantity of subsidi- ary coin at Convention of 1865, 52. Fould, views of, on adoption of gold stand- ard by Latin Union, 57. De Foville, on circulation of France, 256- 259; of Italy, 261; of Belgium, 261, 262; of Switzerland, 262, 263. Foxwell, supports bimetallism at Con- gress of 1889, 241. Franc, established as unit in France by law of 1803, 7; adopted as Belgian monetary unit in 1832, 15; as Swiss unit in 1850, 27; system adopted by Italy in 1862, 36, 37. INDEX 325 Franco-Prussian war, effect on law of 1803, 107; how deprives France of monetary leadership, in, 112. France, monetary history of, 1-14; history of money in, subdivided, i; loses silver prior to 1848, 1-3; nature of circula- tion in, before 1848, 4 n; change in cir- culation of, 6; work of commission of 1858 on circulation of, 12-14; gold coins of, legal-tender in Belgium, 16; deprived of legal-tender quality in Bel- gium, 19; influence of currency of, on Belgian monetary system, 20, 21; mon- etary system of, adopted in Switzer- land, 27, 28; discussion in senate over subsidiary silver, 34, 35; monetary com- mission ordered in 1861, 35, 36; in- vaded by new Italian coin, 39; re- duces fineness of small subsidiary coin by law of 1864, 40; excludes Swiss sil- ver from custom houses, etc., 40; not helped by reduction in fineness of coin, 41; accedes to proposal for monetary convention, 41, attempts to exclude discussion of the standard at Conven- tion of 1865, 44; insists on double stand- ard, 45; demands fineness of .835 at Convention of 1865, 39, 40; quantity of subsidiary coin needed by, discussed at Convention of 1865, 52; attempts to secure endorsement of silver at Interna- tional Convention of 1867, 78; flow of precious metals in, studied, 89-91; dis- cussions of commission of 1867 in, 94- 96; invasion of, by silver in 1868 attracts attention, 97; verdict of cham- bres de commerce and tr^soriers payeurs on bimetallism, 99, loo; coinage in, for 1872 discussed, 115; imports of silver to, in 1873, 115; increase of coinage of silver in, Ii6; summons Convention of 1874, 128, 129; favors limitation of coinage of silver by Latin Union at Convention 011874,135; circulation in, in 1874, 147; coinage of gold in 1874, 152; coins silver for government ac- count in 1875, 159; attitude at Conven- tion of 1876, 161; favorable position of, in exchange market in 1876, 164; gives up "expectant attitude," 172; waives Convention of 1877, 172; favorable com- mercial situation of, in 1878, 180; how controls smaller countries at expiry of Treaty of 1865, 181; insists on redemp- tion of five-franc pieces in 1878, 187; ratisfies Treaty of 1878, 194; refuses new demands of Italy in 1879, 195; at- titude after 1879, 198; undertakes to control retirement of Italian subsidiary coin, 199, 200; irritated by action of Italy against silver, 213; formal de- mands of, presented at Convention of 1885, 223; investigates composition of circulation, 230; represents union in negotiations with Belgium, 228; justi- fiable in attitude toward Belgium, 233; motion for resuming bimetallic confer- ence of 188 1, 238; supports gold at congress of l88q, 24 1; holdings of Ital- ian subsidiary coin by, 247; receives McKinley bimetallic commission coldly, 252; monetary problem in, restated, 253-262; probable situation in case of free coinage, 266; stock of specie of, 265. Five-franc piece, made legal-tender in Bel- gium in 1832, 15; coinage practically suspended in iSbo, 39; coinage of, stud- ied, 88, 90; not necessary for trade with East, 102; depreciation of, 121; coinage of, suspended in Belgium, 126; suspen- sion of, and law of 1803, 149; effort to limit legal-tenderquality of, in Belgium, 170; effort to force into circulation in France, 174; attitude of Italy regarding, at Convention of 1878, 184; coinage of, by Italy provided for in 1878, 190; abrogated, 192; coinage of, discussed at Convention of 1885, 221; manage- ment of, discussed at Convention of 1885, 224; redemption of, provided for in Treaty of 18S5, 226,227; recoinage of, 251. Frfere-Orban, en government coinage of 326 INDEX silver, 150; as leader of Belgian minis- try, 178. Gaudin, estimated coin circulation of France in 1803, 4; misinterpreted by commission of 1867, 95. Germany, monetary condition of, prior to 1857 resembles Swiss, 26; why fails to adopt franc as monetary unit, 112; deprives Austrian silver florin of legal- tender quality, 122; monetary conflict of, with France, 143, 144; progress in monetary reform in, 157. Gold, appears in France only after 1848, I; why not seen prior to 1848, 2-4; coinage of, in France prior to i860, 5; gained by France after 1848, 6; influ- ence of new, in France, 7; fears for future stability, lo; relative advantages of, as a standard, lo; suspension of coin- age of, proposed, 11; views of commis- sion of 1858 on use of, 12, 13; renewed coinage of, recommended, 14; demone- tized in Holland, 17, 18; desire for, in Belgium, 16; efforts to obtain, in Bel- gium, 17; takes place of silver in Swiss circulation, 28; displaces silver in Switzerland, 28; standard based on, adopted by Switzerland, 31, 32; stan- dard based on, demanded at Conven- tion of 1865, 43; coins of, how provided for in Treaty of 1865, 53; influence of new, on formation of Latin Union, 55; standard based directly on, why not adopted by Treaty of 1865, 57, 58; standard of, favored by Belgian mone- tary commission, 124, 125; coinage of, greatly increased in 1874, 149; exports from France, 201, 202; required by Italy in payment for customs, 211; required in bank reserves in Italy, 21 1; effort to secure circulation of, in Swit- zerland, 240; in French circulation, 255; quantity of, in French circulation, 256- 260; in Italy, 260, 261. Greece, joins Latin Union, 80, 81; feeble- ness of, from financial standpoint, 81; condition of, discussed at Convention of 1876, 162; demands of, 161; bank reserves in, 161 ; ratifies treaty of 1885, 234; resigns right to issue fractional coin, 251; condition of circulation in, 263. Grenfell, supports bimetallism in 1889, 241. Gresham's law, operation of, in Latin Union, 88. Guyot, report of, on International Mone- tary Conference of 1878, 182. Haupt, on circulation of France, 256- 259; of Italy, 261 ; of Belgium, 262; of Switzerland, 262. Haute finance, influence of, in EnquSte of 1868, 104. Hayes, President, message of, on bonds, favorably regarded, 176. Harrison, President, on International Monetary Conference of 1892, 245. Hock, Baron, work of, on Austrian mone- tary commission, 81, 82. Holland, change of ratio in 1816, 2; monetary system of, abolished in Bel- gium, 15; demonetization of gold in, 17, 18; ten-florin pieces of, deprived of legal-tender quality in Belgium, ig; attitude of, at international convention of 1867, 78; adopts gold standard, 120; adopts gold standard, 157; im- proved condition of, under gold stand- ard, 168. Imports, of gold and silver to France, 1-4, 6; of gold to France after 1848 cause satisfaction, 6; of gold into Belgium under law of 1832, 17; into Belgium after 1850, 22; of gold and silver to Italy, 62-64; to France studied, 89-91; of silver to France and Belgium, 114; of precious metals to France in 1874, 147; of gold to France in 1875, I57; 'o PVance, 264 n. Indemnity, effect of French, on mono- metallism, tio; on demonetization. Ill; INDEX 327 coin and notes used in, iion; liow liquidated, 129. India, demonetizes gold in 1850, 19; decline of silver coinage in, discussed, 136; fluctuations in value of rupee, 168; mints of, closed to silver, effect on bimetallism, 246. International money, plans for, thwarted by French bimetallism, 84. International conference for unification of weights, measures, and money, de- clares for gold standard, 183. International Exposition of 1867, report of committee on weights and measures at, 96. International monetary action, influence of desire for, in formation of Latin Union, 55; work of Convention of 1867 regarding, 79, 80. International Monetary Conference of 1873, passes resolutions favoring gold standard, 120. International Monetary Conference of 1878, origin, 178; how regarded by Latin Union, 178; views of M. de Parieu on, 178; debates at, 179; effect on Latin Union, 179. International Monetary Conference of 1881, meets, 209; decides adversely to action, 209; depresses bimetallists, 209. International Monetary Conference of 1892, called by U. S., 244; meets, 245; unfavorable to silver, 245. Italy, reduces fineness of subsidiary silver, 36; monetary situation in. prior to 1861 , 37; introduction of new monetary sys- tem in, 37-38; coinage in, 38; new coin of, invades France, 39; attitude at Con- vention of 1865, 43; demands gold standard, 44; demands fineness of .835 for subsidiary silver, at Convention of 1865, 48, 49; establishes cours forcd, 60; deficit in, 60-61; loans of, 61; credit of, bi; stock of coin and paper in, 64, 65; bank capital of, 65; circulation of, 66; note currency of, 68; effect of suspen- sion in, on price of silver, 86; coin of, in Bank of France reserve, 92; coinage of, for 1872, discussed, 115; monetary con- dition of, in 1873, 119; lowers mint price of silver, 130; adopts doubtful attitude at Convention of 1874, '34; conditions demanded at Convention of 1874, 139, 1 40; coins silver for government account, 151; abrogates right to sil- ver free coinage in 1875, 151; coin- age of gold in, 152; recoinages in, 152; allows issue of mint vouchers for 1875, 153; demands larger silver coin- age at Convention of 1S75; why promi- nent at Convention of 1878, 183; attitude at Convention of 1878 regarding five- franc piece, 184; shows dissatisfaction with Treaty of 1878, 195; new demands of, refused by France in 1879, 195; fails to break awa\' from Latin Union, 197; deprives foreign coin of legal-tender quality, 21 1; makes customs payable in gold only, 211; requires bank reserves to be % gold, 212; attitude of, at Con- vention of 1885, 219, 220; ratifies Treaty of 1885,234; Rossi on position of, in Latin Union, 244; disappearance of subsidiary coin from, 246; decides to ask for return of subsidiary coin, 246; subsidiary coin of, ordered withdrawn and redeemed in 1893, 247; holdings of subsidiary coin of, by other countries, 248; issues of subsidiary by, 248; cost of redemption, 250; authorized to pro- hibit exports of subsidiary silver, 251; condition of circulation in, 259, 260. Koch, supports bimetallism at Congress of 1889, 241. Kreglinger, views of, on monetary diffi- culties of Belgium, 24 n; demands gold standard at Convention of 1865, 43, 44; discusses bimetallism, 44, 45. La Haye, statistical congress at, declares for gold, 105. Lardy, on free coinage of silver, at Con- vention of 1885, 222. 328 INDEX Latin Union, first impulse toward, 32; Treaty of 1865 constituting, 42-54; by what influences dominated, 55; to what directly attributable, 55; how far due to desire for international monetary action, 55, 56; why failed to adopt gold standard, 57, 58; cours forc^ in Italy, a bar to its success, 61; how affected by Italian cours forc^, 70; relation of, to International Monetary Convention of 1867, 78; how affected by Inter- national Convention, 80; is joined by Greece, 81; conditionally by Austria, 81 ; relations with Austria, 82; negotia- tions with Spain and Roumania, 83; expansion of, hindered by French bimetallism, 84; formed at unpropitious time, 85; how affected by Franco-Prus- sian war, 109; why outstripped by Ger- many, 114; importance of Convention of 187410, 135; possible courses of action in 1874, 138; why not dissolved in 1873, 143, 144; isolated position of, at opening of 1876, 163; movement of gold of, toward Paris, 163; relation to International Monetary Conference of 1878, 178, 179; reaches turning point in history at Convention of 1878, 181; why not dissolved in 1879, 183; two new principles in, established in 1878, 193; probable influence of secession of Belgium upon, 228; controversy over relation of Belgium to, 229, 230; con- tinued on new basis by Treaty of 1885 [q. v.), 236; chances of permanence better in 1885, 236; secession from, by Italy, impossible, 244; opposes bimet- allism at International Conference of 1892, 245; monetary problem in, restated, 253-259; effect of formation of, on silver, 263-266; not a bimetallic body, 266; future of, 266, 267; a failure, 267. Laveleye, supports bimetallism at Con- gress of 1889, 241. DeLavenay, favors gold, on commission of 1867, 76. Law of 1803, effect, 1-4; fails to provide concurrent circulation, 6; results in alternating standard, 7? provisions and nature of, 7„ 8; proposed modifica- tions, 8, 9; copied by Belgian law of 1832, 15; Wolowski on, 104; why not abrogated after 1870, 107. Law of 1832, establishes French system in Belgium, 15. Law of 1850, Swiss, provisions of, 27. Law of i860, Swiss, lowers fineness of subsidiary silver coin, 32, 33; effects of, on France and Belgium, 33, 34. Legal-tender, as applied to subsidiary coin, discussed in Convention of 1865, .50. Leroy Beaulieu, admits Belgian claims regarding silver five-franc pieces, 230, 231. L^on, asks French chambers for gold standard, 38. Levasseur, takes part in early French monetary controversy, 10. Ley, adopted as Roumanian monetary unit, 83. Limitation, of silver coinage, introduced by France in 1873, 117; by Belgium, 117; unsatisfactory to public, 141. Loan (Italian), history of, 205-207; helps bimetallic cause in France, 207. London Economist, favors international money, 75; favors gold standard, 75; on relation of Belgium to Latin Union, 229. Lorraine, see Alsace. Luzzatti, on monetary policy of Italy, 211. Lyons, chamber of commerce of, favors gold standard, 121. Magliani, introduces bill for abolition of Italian cours fo^c^, 205; on secession of Italy from Latin Union, 242. Magne, unwilling to authorize introduc- tion of gold bill, 105; favors new mone- tary commission in 1869, 106; ad- dressed, in favor of gold standard, 121; explains danger of influx of silver, 128. INDEX 329 Magnin, on bimetallism, 208; on diffi- culties with gold standard in Germany, 208. Malou, views of, on monetary question in Belgium, 16 n; calls Belgian Monetary Commission of 1873, 123; submits bill for suspending or limiting coinage of silver five-franc piece, 125; on bimetal- lism and tlie cours forcfe, 129; deposits silver for coinage on government ac- count, 150; continues policy in 1875, 158; aslis continuance of silver suspen- sion, 167; opposes effort to limit legal- tender quality of silver, 170. McKinley, President, bimetallic commis- sion of, meets rebuff, 252. Micelli, introduces bill for abolition of Italian cours forc^, 205. Minghetti, on monetary policy of Italy, 211. Monetary Commission (English), effect of report of, in France, 239. Monetary Congress (of 1889), arranged, 239 ; stimulates bimetallic agitation, 241; opened, 241; leans toward bimet- allism, 241. Monetary Convention (Belgian), sum- moned in 1873, 123; its discussions, 122, 123; its decisions, 123, 124; favors gold standard, 124, 125. Monometallism, first seriously discussed in France after 1 848, 8; advocates of, divided, 8, 9; arguments for, in France, 8, 9 ; in Convention of 1865, 42; de- manded by smaller countries at con- vention of 1865, 43; declared for by Austria, 82; discussed in commission of 1867, 95; effect of, discussed at Enquete of 1868, loi, 102; supported by German currency convention, 105; by statistical congress at La Haye, 105 ; supported by Conseil Sup^rieur in France, 106; how retarded by Franco-Prussian war, 108; how affected by French indemnity, 109; adopted by Germany, iii, 112; gold, favored by International Monetary Conference of 1873, 120. Naples, demonetizes gold in 1850, 19. Napoleon, hopes of, in formation of Latin Union, 56. Notes, irredeemable, see cours forc^. Nothomb, views on solution of monetary problem, 23 n. Ott-Trumpler, advocates adoption of gold by Switzerland, 30. Parieu, opens Convention of 1865, 43; ex- presses opinion on discussion of the standard, at Convention of 1865, 44; views as to duration of Treaty of 1865, 52, 53; favors gold on commission of 1867, 76; sums up work of International Convention of 1867, 79, 80; on invasion of silver, 130; on dangerous position of F'rance in 1876, 164; introduces bill for suspension of mint vouchers, 165; op- poses bimetallism in the senate, 208 ; sketches history of law of 1803, 208 ; on International Monetary Conference of 1881, 208. Peseta, adopted as monetary unit by Spain, 83. Pinard, favors bimetallism, 60 n. Pirmez, views of, on bimetallism in Bel- gium, 16; attitude at International Mon- etary Conference of 1878, 179; report of, on International Monetary Conference of 1878, 182; presents views of Belgium at Convention of 1S85, 219, 220; refers French demands to Belgian ministry, 223. Premium, on gold in Italy, 68, 69. Prussia, calls currency convention, 105. Rappe, subdivision of Swiss coin, 27. Ratio, fixed by law of 1803, i; fluctua- tions in market, i; how affected by changes in demand, 2 ; changes in, in Belgium, 16-18 ; influence of fluctua- tions in market, in Belgium, 23 ; how treated at Convention of 1865, 46, 47; importance of stability in, to success of Latin Union, 85 ; fluctuations in, 89 ; discussed in Enquete of 1868, 103. 330 INDEX Recoinage, discussed, 239; in Italy, 240; of five-franc pieces, 251. Redemption, of subsidiary silver, pro- vided for by Treaty of 1865, 51; of subsidiary silver by Italy, provided for in 1878, 188; details of, 192; es- tablished as a. principle in 1878, 193; of Italian subsidiary, effected in 1879, 199; made basis of renewal of union in 1885, 212; attitude of different countries on, of silver, 214; of silver five-franc pieces, provided for by Trea- ty of 1885, 225, 226; of Italian sub- sidiary coin, 246, 247. Rente, value of Italian, 62 ; Italian, how affected in value by war, 63 n; return of Italian, influences flow of specie into France, 91; issued by Italy to terminate cours forc^, 205 ; sale of, 206, 207. Ressman, attitude of, on behalf of Italy at Convention of 1878, 184. Resumption, steps toward, in France, 148. Reunion Island, proposed extension of Treaty of 1865 to, 199 n. Rossi, on monetary question, 244. Rothschild, favors bimetallism, 59 n. Rouland, favors bimetallism, 59 n; on silver in vaults of Bank of France, 92; opposes monometallism in 1876, 165. Roumania, negotiations with Latin Union, 83 ; adopts the ley-franc, 83. Royal commission, work of, in favor of international gold standard, 97, 98. Russia, effect of increased production of gold in, 18. Saint-Andr^, work on credit system of p'rance, 10. Say, secures passage of bill forbidding coinage of silver in France, 165 ; secures prolongation of silver suspen- sion, 177; attitude at International Monetary Conference of 1878, 179 ; in- troduces bill ratifying Treaty of 1878, 196 ; at Convention of i879«on return and redemption of Italian coin, 196 ; on withdrawal of Italian subsidiary silver, 199. Silver, sole circulation of France prior to 1848, 1-4; expelled after 1848, 6; coinage of, prior to i860, 5 ; stan- dard reallybased on, by law of 1803, 7, 8 ; relative advantages and disad- vantages of, 10 ; scarcity of subsidiary, in France, II ; views of commission of 1858 on use and price of, 12-14; Bel- gium placed on basis of, 19; condition of circulation of, in Belgium, 19, 20 ; coinage of, in Belgium, 21; imports and exports of, in Belgium, 22, standard adopted in Switzerlarid in 1850, 27; expelled from Swiss circulation by gold, 28, 29 ; coinage of, declines in France after i860, 39 ; causes of decline in its price, 86-88 ; increase of, in reserve of Bank of France, 92 ; discredited by chambres de commerce and tr^soriers payeurs in France, 99, 100 ; increase in coinage of, discussed at Enquete of 1868, 102 ; accumulation of, in Bank of France, 102; increase in coinage of, 102; declines in price in 1872, 115; imports of, into France and Belgium in 1873, IIS ■> coinage of, limited in France in 1873, 117 ; movement into Belgium, 122 ; coinage of, suspended in Belgium, 126; mint price of, lowered in Italy, 130; future of, discussed at Conven- tion of 1874, 136, 137; depreciation, how far due to Germany's action, 137 ; larger coinage of, demanded by Italy for 1875, 154; coined for government account by France, 159; coinage of, suspended in France, 165; effort to limit legal tender quality of, in Belgium, 170; prospects , for rehabilitation less bright, 173; Italian, flow into other countries undesirable, 184 ; coinage of, discussed in convention of 1878, 188 ; redemption of subsidiary, by Italy, provided for in Treaty of 1878, 188, 189 ; amount of Italian subsidiary, in INDEX 331 • foreign countries in 1879, 199; opera- tion of withdrawing Italian subsidiary, 200 ; coinage of, discussed at Conven- tion of 1885, 222, 223 ; free, when to be resumed, specified by Treaty of 1885, 232; in French circulation, 255, 256; quantity of, in France, 256-259; in Italy, 259-261 ; effect of action of Latin Union on, 263-266 ; stocli of, in France, 264 ; exports and imports of, 266, 267 ; problem of, in Latin Union, discourag- ing, 266. Soetbeer, influence of investigations of, on bimetallic controversy, 98. Soubeyran, speaks against gold standard, 128; proposes international conference on silver, 204 ; introduces bimetallic question in the senate, 208 ; presents argument for free coinage of silver, 214. Sovereign, made legal-tender in Belgium, 17 ; deprived of legal-tender quality in Belgium, 18. Spain, demonetizes gold in 1850, 19; ne- gotiates for admission to Latin Union, 83; adopts tlie peseta, rejects the real and escudo, 83. Specie payments, see cours force. Speculation, effect of, on Belgian coin- age, 23 ; mode of, in Belgium, 24 ; re- moves subsidiary circulation, 41 ; in Switzerland in 1873, IiS; in Holland, 168 n. Speiser, urges adoption of gold by Swit- zerland, 29, 30. Standard, alternating, established by law of 1803, 6, 7 ; ambiguity of law of 1803 regarding, 7, 8 ; double, first dis- cussed after 1848, 8 ; alternating, re- garded as desirable, 8 ; arguments against alternating, 8 ; alternating es- tablished in Belgium by law of 1832, 15; of France, practically adopted in Swit- zerland, 28 ; gold, demanded by smaller countries at Convention of 1S65, 44; arguments regarding, at Convention of 1865, 45; double, retards extension of Latin Union, 74, 75; gold, declared for by Austria, 82 ; effect of single, dis- cussed in Enquete of 1868, loi, 102 ; gold, favored by International Mone- tary Conference of 1873, 120. Subsidiary coin, early withdrawal of, in France, 11 ; scarcity of, in Belgium, 22, 23: reduced in fineness in Switzer- land by law of i860, 32 ; by Italy, 37 ; Swiss, drives French and Belgian out of circulation, 33 ; coinage of, declines after i860, 39; of lowest denomina- tions, reduced in fineness by France, 40 ; Swiss, discredited in France, 40 ; French, absorbed by speculators, 41 ; legal-tender quality of, discussed, 50 ; provisions of Treaty of 1865 regarding, 50, 51; fiduciary character of, insisted upon by Switzerland, 40 ; regulated in amount by Treaty of 1865,51, 52; re- demption of, demanded of Italy in 1878, 185 ; proposed restoration of old fineness of, 185; redemption of, by Italy, provided for in 1878,188,189; quotas of, increased in 1S78, 190, 191 ; details of redemption of, by Italy, in 1878, 192 ; estimated amount of Italian, in France and the allied countries, 199; amounts of Italian, withdrawn, 200; speculation in Italian, 241 ; disappear- ance of Italian, 246 ; condition of, in- vestigated in 1843,247, 248; Italian or- dered withdrawn, 249 ; holdings of Italian by other countries, 249 ; issues of, by Italy, 249 ; scarcity of, leads to Convention of 1897, 250 ; power to prohibit export of, granted to Italy, 252. Switzerland, demonetizes gold in 1850, 19 ; early confusion of monetary sys- tem in, 26 ; provisions of Bundcbver- fassung of 1848 on coinage, 26 ; pro- visions of Federal Constitution, 26 ; monetary controversy in, 28-31 ; re- port of committee of national assem- bly in, on monetary problem, 31,32; attitude at Convention of 1865, 43; demands gold standard, 44 ; demands 332 INDEX as to fineness at Convention of 1865, 48 ; insists on fiduciary nature of sub- sidiary coins, 40 ; demands exclusion of token coins from Treaty of 1865,51; coinage in, for 1872, discussed, 115 ; monetary condition of, in 1873, 118, 1 1 g ; speculation in, 1 1 9 ; calls for Con- vention of 1874, 127 ; urges gold standard, 127; attitude of, at Conven- tion of 1874,134; coins silver quota in 1874 for government account, 151 ; sug- gests curtailment of coinage of silver by Treaty of 1875, 155 ; attitude at Con- vention of 1876, 161 ; ratifies treaty of 1878, 194 ; announces withdrawal from union, 213; ratifies Treaty of 1885,234; effort to secure gold circulation, 240 ; holding of Italian subsidiary coin by, 247 ; condition of circulation, 262. Sweden, coinage of gold in, 98. Tariff, on French silver exports proposed by commission of 1858, 13. Ten- franc piece, withdrawn by Bank of France, 238. Tirard, formulates monetary policy of France in 1884, 213. Token money, discussed at Convention of 1865, 51, 52. Treaty of 1865, not bi-metallic, 44, 45; its nature analyzed, 46; criticised, 46, 47; adopts fineness of .835 for subsidiary silver, 40; provides for legal tender quality and redemption of subsidiary silver, 50; provides quota of subsidiary silver for each state, 50, 51; provides for amount of coinage, 52; provisions for accession to, 52; provisions for gold coins, 53; advantages of, 53, 54; dan- gers of, 54; why distasteful to indus- trial interests, 57; why adopted, 57, 58; failure to acquire popularity, 71; criti- cisms on, 72, 73; ratification of, 74; an incident in international monetary movement, 94; why renewed in 1879, 181. 182. Treaty of 1878, prerequisites to, 185; drafted, 188; agreed upon, 191; estab- lishes two principles, 193; ratified in France, Belgium, and Switzerland, 194 dissatisfaction of Italy with, 194. Treaty of 1874, discussed, 132-139; pro visions of, 140, 141; explained bymon etary committee of French chambers, 146. Treaty of 1875, adopted, 156; reaction ary in its nature, 157. Treaty of 1876, framed, 161, 162; disap pointment to monometallists, 162. Treaty of 1878, drafted, 191; provisions, 192; ratified, 194. Treaty of 1885, an anomaly, 2i5; drafted, 225; provisions, 225-227; protocol de fines relation to Belgium in case of secession, 232; makes agreement with Belgium by Acte Additionnel, 233 ratified in France, 234; in other coun- tries, 234; implied substitution of new league, 236; expiration of, 241. Treaty of 1893, provisions of, 247; ratified, 249. Treaty of 1897, provisions of, 245; protocol to, signed 1898, 251; ratified, 251. Tr^soriers, verdict of, for gold standard in 1868, 99, 100. Twenty-franc piece, effort to withdraw, 238. United States, change of ratio in 1834, 2; silver bill in, 243; calls new interna- tional conference, 244. United States Monetary Commission, in- correct statements in report of, as to international convention of 1867, 79 n; viewed with contempt in France, 173. De Waru, favors bimetallism, 59 n. Withdrawal, of Italian subsidiary coin ef- fected, 199. Wolowski, takes part in early French monetary controversy, lo; favors bimet- allism in Convention of 1867, 75; on intent of law of 1803, 104; on proposed change to gold standard, 128.