g 
 
 
 < 
 
 
 
 
 i\ 
 
 
 
 it 
 
 
 r-*4lcw'i"^ 
 
 
 **- i 
 
 ^ 
 
 ':'^K^ '\'f^ 
 

 >7- 
 
 ■4<r 
 
 u 
 
AN INDEX 
 
 TO THE 
 
 Cornell University Library 
 KFC 45.6.138 
 
 An index to the California decisions in 
 
 3 1924 017 205 430 
 
 CALIFORNIA DECISIONS 
 
 IN THE PACIFIC REPORTER 
 TO MAY, 1899 
 
 NOT REPORTED IN 
 THE CALIFORNIA REPORTS 
 
 St. Paul, Minn. 
 
 WEST PUBLISHING CO. 
 
 1900 
 
FULL REPORTS 
 
 OF THE 
 
 California Supreme Court 
 
 WITH ALL OPINIONS IN FULL, 
 
 Includ 
 from 
 
 i"^ 500 to 750 California Cases per Annum, 
 In the Pacific Reporter, 
 
 COVERING ALL CASES THAT WILL AFTERWARDS APPEAR IN THE 
 
 CALIFORNIA REPORTS. 
 
 Promptly, in unbindable weekly Advance Sheets, 
 
 Finally, in bound volumes for the library, after the revision by the judges, 
 
 WITH TABLES OF CASES, 
 
 TABLES OF STATUTES CITED AND CONSTRUED, 
 
 TABLES OF OFFICIAL CITATIONS. 
 
 ,«? ^ THE PACIFIC ^ ^ 
 
 Also gives, without additional charge, full reports of all decisions of the Su- 
 preme Courts of Oregon, Washington, and other Western states and territories, 
 covering thirteen in all. 
 
 Subscription price, J4 a volume, including binding, delivery, and with the 
 weekly Advance Sheets. 
 
 Each volume contains the equivalent of four to six volumes of State Reports. 
 
 The Pacific makes about 4 volumes a year, so that the annual cost to sub- 
 scribers is about ;Si6. 
 
 Sample copies of the advance' sheets will be sent, without charge, on request. 
 Address 
 
 WEST PUBLISHING CO., St. Paul, Minn. 
 
 C3047 
 
AN INDEX 
 
 TO THE 
 
 CALIFORNIA DECISIONS 
 
 IN THE PACIFIC REPORTER 
 TO MAY, 1899 
 
 NOT REPORTED IN 
 THE CALIFORNIA REPORTS 
 
 St. Paul, Minn. 
 
 WEST PUBLISHING CO. 
 
 1900 
 
Cornell University 
 Library 
 
 The original of tiiis book is in 
 tine Cornell University Library. 
 
 There are no known copyright restrictions in 
 the United States on the use of the text. 
 
 http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924017205430 
 
PUBLISHERS' PREFACE. 
 
 The bar of California lias been well aware, for a number of years, 
 that many California cases were omitted from the olficial reports. 
 Every volume of the Pacific Reporter, wbich, though unofflcial, is 
 exhaustive, has contained a number of California supreme court de- 
 cisions not accessible elsewhere. These cases have run, in the differ- 
 ent volumes, from 11 to 94, and on a recent count made up a total of 
 1,864. (This, of course, does not include those recent cases reported 
 in the Pacific which may appear in the forthcoming volumes of the 
 state reports.) For the convenience of the local bar, we present here- 
 with a table of these cases, with an index showing the law points in 
 the decisions. Lawyers who are not subscribers for the Pacific may 
 not have realized how perfectly and completely the Pacific meets their 
 demand for a trustworthy, prompt, and exhaustive report of their su- 
 preme court decisions. 
 
 Although these cases have not been published in the official reports, 
 a large number of them have been cited iy the California suprems 
 court in subsequent decisions. 
 
 WEST PUBLISHING CO. 
 
 St Paul, Minn., June 21, 1900. 
 
 C3047-1 (3) 
 
TABLE OF CASES. 
 
 [The References are to the Pacific Reporter.] 
 
 A 
 
 Vol. Page 
 Abbott V. Seventy-Six Land 
 
 & Water Co 25 694 
 
 Abbott V. Sorenty-Six Laud 
 
 & Water Co 53 445 
 
 Abbott V. Southern Pae. R. 
 
 Co 42 42 
 
 Ackerman's Estate, In re. . 22 141 
 
 Adair v. Crane 8 512 
 
 Adair V. White 34 338 
 
 Adams v. Andross 26 108 
 
 Adams V. De Boom 39 858 
 
 Adams v. Farns worth 37 221 
 
 Adelsdorf er v. Ehrman 5 915 
 
 Afflerbach V. McGovern 36 839 
 
 Agnew V. Kimball 9 91 
 
 Ah Goon T. Tarpey 7 188 
 
 Ailsman v. Murphy 55 1099 
 
 Ailiman v. Sanborn 52 729 
 
 Alemauy v. Ortega 4 13 
 
 Alexander v. Chick 30 587 
 
 Alexander v. Jackson 25 415 
 
 Alexander v. Municipal 
 
 Court of Appeals 4 961 
 
 Alhambra Addition Water 
 
 Co. V. Richardson 12 343 
 
 Allen, In re 16 319 
 
 Allen V. Allen 27 30 
 
 Allen V. Holt 7 421 
 
 AUingham v. Rix 28 579 
 
 Alpers V. Knight 8 446 
 
 Alpers V. Superior Court. . 4 504 
 
 Ames V. Wilson , 9 315 
 
 Anderson, Ex parte, two 
 
 cases 24 743 
 
 Anderson V. Burkhart 5 612 
 
 Andrews v. Wilbur 41 790 
 
 Angevine v. Knox-Goodrich 31 529 
 
 Appleby v. Jansen's Heirs. . 33 438 
 
 Applegrath v. Burris 19 693 
 
 Arata V. Tellurium G. & S. 
 
 Min. Co 4 344 
 
 Arnot V. Baird 12 386 
 
 Asbill V. Standley 31 738 
 
 Ascha V. Fitch 46 298 
 
 Ashton V. Dashaway Ass'n 33 446 
 
 Ashton V. Heydenfeldt 56 1031 
 
 Auburn Opera-House & Pa- 
 vilion Ass'n V. Hill 32 587 
 
 Austin V. Bick 34 822 
 
 Austin V. Gagan 30 790 
 
 Austin V. Pnlschen 39 799 
 
 Austin V. Pulschen.... 42 306 
 
 Aylesworth v. Dean 12 241 
 
 CAL.CAS. (5) 
 
 B 
 
 Bagley r. Cohen 
 
 Bahwell v. Smith 
 
 Bailey, Ex parte 
 
 Bailey v. Sloan 
 
 Bailiff v. Powers 
 
 Baines v. Story 
 
 Baines v. Story 
 
 Baird v. Milford Land & 
 Lumber Co 
 
 Baker v. Baker 
 
 Bancroft v. Bancroft 
 
 Bancroft v. San Francisco 
 Tool Co 
 
 Bank of British North 
 America v. Alaska Imp. 
 Co 
 
 Bank of Chico v. Spect. . . . 
 
 Bank of Escondido v. Thom- 
 as 
 
 Bank of Lemoore v. Gulart 
 
 Bank of Orlaud v. Finnell . . 
 
 Bank of Oroville v. Law- 
 rence 
 
 Bank of Ukiah v. Gibson. . 
 
 Bank of Ukiah v. Gibson. . 
 
 Bank of Ukiah v. Gibson. . 
 
 Bank of Yolo v. Weaver'. . . . 
 
 Barclay v. •Severance 
 
 Barkly v. Copeland 
 
 Barley v. Buell 
 
 Barnes, In re 
 
 Barnett v. Mulkins 
 
 Barnhart v. Edwards 
 
 Barrere v. Somps 
 
 Barrett v. Austin 
 
 Barrett v. Superior Court of 
 Placer County 
 
 Barrows v. Fox 
 
 Barry v. Goad 
 
 Barry v. Murphy 
 
 Barry v. St. Joseph's Hos- 
 pital & Sanitarium of the 
 Sisters of Mercy 
 
 Bartlett v. McGee 
 
 Bartlett v. O'Connor 
 
 Batchelder v. Brickell 
 
 Bates V. Gregory 
 
 Bates V. McDowell 
 
 Bath V. Valdez 
 
 Bath V. Veldez 
 
 Bayley v. Employers' Liabil- 
 ity Assur. Corp 
 
 Bean v. Proseus 
 
 Vol. 
 
 Pagt 
 
 50 
 
 4 
 
 42 
 
 822 
 
 3 
 
 107 
 
 2 
 
 44 
 
 37 
 
 508 
 
 27 
 
 676 
 
 30 
 
 777 
 
 27 
 
 296 
 
 31 
 
 355 
 
 40 
 
 488 
 
 47 
 
 684 
 
 31 
 
 729 
 
 11 
 
 740 
 
 41 
 
 462 
 
 .54 
 
 1111 
 
 56 
 
 607 
 
 37 
 
 936 
 
 39 
 
 1069 
 
 39 
 
 1071 
 
 41 
 
 1010 
 
 31 
 
 160 
 
 35 
 
 865 
 
 25 
 
 405 
 
 9 
 
 549 
 
 16 
 
 S96 
 
 40 
 
 115 
 
 47 
 
 251 
 
 45 
 
 572 
 
 31 
 
 3 
 
 47 
 
 592 
 
 30 
 
 768 
 
 24 
 
 1023 
 
 21 
 
 724 
 
 48 
 
 68 
 
 45 
 
 1029 
 
 36 
 
 513 
 
 17 
 
 442 
 
 22 
 
 683 
 
 34 
 
 327 
 
 9 
 
 424 
 
 7 
 
 487 
 
 56 
 
 638 
 
 31 
 
 49 
 
CALIFOBNIA CASES. 
 
 Vol. 
 
 Becker v. Feigenbaum 45 
 
 Beckman v. Bronner 11 
 
 Bedell v. Scoggins 40 
 
 Bell, Ex parte 34 
 
 Bell V. Suusalito Land & 
 
 Ferry Co 33 
 
 Bell V. Woodward 42 
 
 Bell V. Woodward 42 
 
 Bcnicia Agriculture Works 
 
 V. Bstes 32 
 
 Bennett v. Morris 37 
 
 Benson v. Central Pac. R. 
 
 Co 33 
 
 Benson v. Shotwell 25 
 
 Berlin v. Farwell 31 
 
 Bernard, Ex parte 12 
 
 Bernheim v. Porter 4 
 
 Berniaud v. Beecher 22 
 
 Berry v. Kowalsky 27 
 
 Berton's Estate, In re 31 
 
 Bibb V. Bancroft 22 
 
 Bigelow V. Ballerino 41 
 
 BiggerstafC v. Briggs 4 
 
 Bishop V. Glassen 12 
 
 Bituminous Lime Kock Pav. 
 
 & Imp. Co. V. Fulton.... 33 
 
 Bixby V. Crafts 53 
 
 Blackburn v. Abila 39 
 
 Blanchard v. Pacific EoUing- 
 
 Mill Co 36 
 
 Bliss V. Carroll 9 
 
 Blumeuthal v. Goodall 25 
 
 Blvthe V. Ayres, eight cases 36 
 
 Blythe v. Savage 36 
 
 Blvthe T. Torre 38 
 
 Blythe's Estate, In re 38 
 
 Board of Education v. 
 
 Franklin 4 
 
 Board of Education of City 
 and County of San Fran- 
 cisco V. Blake 38 
 
 Board of Snp'rs of City and 
 County of San Francisco 
 
 V. Superior Court 50 
 
 Boehm t. Gibson 35 
 
 Bonds of Madera Irrigation 
 
 Dist., In re 28 
 
 Bottiller v. Dominguez 13 
 
 Bourn v. Dowdell 50 
 
 Bowers Rubber Co. v. Bias- 
 del 47 
 
 Bowman, In re 18 
 
 Bowman v. Dewey 8 
 
 Boyd V. Boyd 31 
 
 Boyd y. Slayback 5 
 
 Boyle T. Solstein 16 
 
 Bradley v. Parker 34 
 
 Bradley y. Superior Court of 
 
 Alameda Co 8 
 
 Braly v. Henry 18 
 
 Brandon y. Superior Court. . 11 
 
 Brannan's Estate, In re.... 51 
 Breedlove v, Norwich Union 
 
 Fire Ins. Soc 54 
 
 Brickell v. Board of Sup'rs of 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco 35 
 
 Broder v. Superior Court. . 33 
 
 Broker v. Taylor 43 
 
 Brown v. Central Pac. R. 
 
 Co 12 
 
 Page 
 837 
 565 
 954 
 641 
 
 449 
 1085 
 1086 
 
 938 
 929 
 
 206 
 681 
 527 
 487 
 446 
 1151 
 286 
 576 
 484 
 14 
 371 
 258 
 
 1117 
 404 
 797 
 
 584 
 88 
 131 
 588 
 844 
 639 
 1108 
 
 1191 
 
 536 
 
 432 
 1014 
 
 284 
 685 
 695 
 
 931 
 406 
 613 
 1108 
 161 
 898 
 234 
 
 617 
 798 
 128 
 320 
 
 93 
 
 357 
 630 
 
 387 
 
 512 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Brown v. Griffith 9 425 
 
 Brown v. Hinton 46 1113 
 
 Brown V. Mann 9 545 
 
 Brown v. Mann 9 549 
 
 Brown y. Parker 33 728 
 
 Brown v. Superior Court. . 3 895 
 
 Brown v. Winship 33 728 
 
 Bryan v. Tormey 21 725 
 
 Bryant V. Bank of California 7 128 
 
 Bryant v. Bank of California 8 644 
 
 Bryson v. McCone 53 639 
 
 Buckley v. AlthofE 24 635 
 
 Buhman v. Becker 42 28 
 
 Bull V. Coe 15 123 
 
 BuUard's Estate, In re 31 1119 
 
 Bullion & Exchange Bank 
 
 of Carson City v. Spooner 36 121 
 Bullock y. Consumers' Lum- 
 ber Co 31 367 
 
 Bunting V. Salz 22 1132 
 
 Burdick's Estate, In re 40 35, 
 
 Burgess v. Superior Court. . 13 166 
 
 Burke v. Bours 26 102 
 
 Burke v. Schwerdt 6 381 
 
 Burling y. Newlands 39 49 
 
 Burness v. W. R. Strong Co. 36 396 
 
 Burnett V. Llewelyn 32 702 
 
 Burns V. Sennett 44 1068 
 
 Burr V. Johnson 29 1100 
 
 Burr T. Navarro Mill Co. . 35 990 
 
 Burris v. Kennedy 38 971 
 
 Burt v. Collins 3 128 
 
 Burton v. Nichols 1 896 
 
 Butcher v. Vaca Valley & 
 
 C. L. R. Co 5 359 
 
 Buteau v. Schmidt 44 162 
 
 Butte Co. v. Boydstun 11 781 
 
 Buttner V. Smith 36 652 
 
 Bygum V. Southern Pac. Co. 36 415 
 
 Byrne y. Lnning Co 38 454 
 
 Byrne's Estate, In re 54 1015 
 
 Byxbee V. Dewey 47 52 
 
 Caffrey v. Omilak Gold & 
 
 Silver Min. Co 36 388 
 
 Caffrey v. Omilak Gold & 
 
 Silver Min. Co 36 6.52 
 
 Cahen v. Mahoney 12 300 
 
 Cahill V. Colgan 31 614 
 
 Cain V. Cody 29 778 
 
 California Academy of Sci- 
 ences v. Fletcher 33 857 
 
 California Dry Dock Co. v. 
 
 Mertens 27 22 
 
 California Ins. Co. v. 
 
 Schindler 1 474 
 
 California Loan & Trust Co. 
 
 v. Hammell 43 955 
 
 California Powder Works v. 
 
 Blue Tent Consolidated 
 
 Hyd. Gold Mines of Cal. . 22 391 
 California Southern B. Co. 
 
 V. Colton Land & Water 
 
 Co 2 38 
 
 California Southern R. Co. 
 
 V. Colton Land & Water 
 
 Co: 4 414 
 
TABLE OF CASES. 
 
 Vol. Page 
 California Southern E. Co. 
 
 V. Southern Pac. R. Co. . 4 346 
 California Southern R. R. Co. 
 
 V. Southern Pac. R. R. Co. 7 128 
 
 Cameron v. Calberg 31 530 
 
 Campbell v. Judd 7 804 
 
 Campbell v. Quackenbush . . 31 746 
 
 Campbell V. West 29 645 
 
 Cauavan v. Municipal Court 
 
 of Appeals 2 887 
 
 Cannon v. McGrew 46 463 
 
 Capital Sav. Bank v. 
 
 Cronkite 4 487 
 
 Carlisle v. Tulare County. . 49 3 
 Carlson v. Mutual Relief 
 
 Ass'n ; 6 395 
 
 Carr v. Quigley 16 9 
 
 Carriger's Estate, In re 41 700 
 
 Carroll, Ex parte 34 518 
 
 Carroll v. Seymour 26 350 
 
 Garscaddon V. Taylor 23 220 
 
 Carter V. Allen 4 1064 
 
 Carter V. Paige 20 729 
 
 Casey v. Jordan 9 99 
 
 Cass, Ex parte 13 169 
 
 Castagniuo v. Balletta 21 1097 
 
 Castle V. Hickman 41 1036 
 
 Castle V. Smith 36 859 
 
 Castle Dome Min. & Smelt- 
 ing Co., In re 18 794 
 
 Castro V. City and County 
 
 of San Francisco 35 1035 
 
 Caswell V. Harris 13 166 
 
 Cator T. Pacific Bank 39 218 
 
 Catts V. Simpson 23 294 
 
 Chace V. Jennings 28 681 
 
 Chadbourne v. Stockton Sav. 
 
 & Loan Soc 36 127 
 
 Chaff ey v. Dexter 4 980 
 
 Chalf ant v. Jones 5 626 
 
 Chalmers v. Chalmers 3 104 
 
 Champlin, Appeal of 32 567 
 
 Chapin v. Brown 34 525 
 
 Chapman v. Pennie 39 14 
 
 Chapman v. Polack 5 232 
 
 Charlton v. Southern Pac. 
 
 R. Co 33 1119 
 
 Chase V. High; 35 1035 
 
 Chatfield, Ex parte 36 948 
 
 Chester v. Tokla^ 6 85 
 
 Chetwood t. Superior Court 
 
 of Alameda County 56 1130 
 
 Chico High School Board v. 
 
 Ward 50 1100 
 
 Chielovich v. Krauss 9 945 
 
 Chielovich T. Krauss 11 781 
 
 Childs V. Edmunds 10 130 
 
 Childs T. Kincaid 30 525 
 
 Christensen v. Jessen 40 747 
 
 Christensen v. McBride 36 398 
 
 Church V. McCabe 53 1128 
 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco v. Baldwin .... 2 410 
 City and County of San Fran- 
 cisco V. Burr 36 771 
 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco v. Flood 2 409 
 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco v. Grote 47 938 
 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco V. Phelan 2 402 
 
 Vol. Page 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco v. Russell 34 516 
 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco V. Sharon 2 402 
 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco v. Wangenlieim.. 37 221 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco v. Western 
 
 Union Tel. Co 31 14 
 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco v. Widber 43 962 
 
 City of Eureka v. Oroghan 19 485 
 City of Los Angeles v. Wal- 
 
 dron 1 883 
 
 City of San Francisco t. 
 
 Low 8 600 
 
 City of Stockton v. Dahl... 4 369 
 
 Clark V. Budd 27 759 
 
 Clark V. Olsen 33 -274 
 
 Clarke t. Baird 34 777 
 
 Clarke v. Jennings 32 1049 
 
 Clarke v. Mott 33 884 
 
 Clarkson v. Hoyt 36 3982 
 
 Cleary v. Folger 33 877 
 
 Cleghorn v. Cleghorn 7 646 
 
 Clements V. McGinn 33 920 
 
 Cline V. Bobbins 55 150 
 
 Clough, V. Borello 48 330 
 
 Coburn v. Josselyn 21 4 
 
 Cockius V. Cook 41 406 
 
 CofCey T. Quint 28 799 
 
 Cohen v. Mitchell 9 649 
 
 Colegrove v. Smith 33 115 
 
 Coleman v. Cummins 20 80 
 
 Colfax Mountain Fruit Co. 
 
 V. Southern Pac. Co 46 668 
 
 Collins, In re 23 374 
 
 Collins V. Frost 3 608 
 
 Colton V. Onderdonk 10 398 
 
 Colusa County v. Seube.... 53 654 
 
 Colusa County v. Seube 53 1128 
 
 Combs V. Hawes 8 597 
 
 Commercial Bank of Madera 
 
 V. Redfield 55 772 
 
 Commissioners of Supreme 
 
 Court and Secretary there- 
 for. In re 6 874 
 
 Conklin V. Stone 6 378 
 
 Conlon v. Gardner 32 565 
 
 Connolly v. City and County 
 
 of San Francisco 33 1109 
 
 Connolly v. Wicks 51 37 
 
 Conrad v. Arrowhead Hot 
 
 Springs Hotel Co 37 388 
 
 Cook, Ex parte 39 16 
 
 Cook V. City and County of 
 
 San Francisco 22 1094 
 
 Cook V. McKinney 11 799 
 
 Cook V. Rochf ord 12 568 
 
 Cooper v.. McCarthy 36 2 
 
 Cooper V. Monterey County 38 311 
 
 Cooper V. Wilder 41 26 
 
 Corcoran v. Hinkel 34 1031 
 
 Cornwall v, McElrath 39 617 
 
 Corran, Ex parte 41 464 
 
 County of Amador v. Isaacs 11 758 
 County of Los. Angeles v. 
 
 Morgan 4 456 
 
 County of Santa Clara v. 
 
 Central Pac. R. Co 6 745 
 
 Cox V. Hayes 7 761 
 
CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Cox V. Ireland 4 457 
 
 Cox V. McLaughlin 18 111 
 
 Cox V. O'Neil 4 456 
 
 Craig V. Allen 9 429 
 
 Cramer v. Kester 36 415 
 
 Cramer v. Tittle 11 852 
 
 Craven T. Nolan 8 518 
 
 Crawford v. Harris 45 819 
 
 Crescent City Mill & Transp. 
 
 Co. V. Hayes 6 455 
 
 Crescent City Mill & Transp. 
 
 Co. V. Hayes 8 692 
 
 Crescent City Mill & Transp. 
 
 Co. V. Hayes 11 319 
 
 Crites v. Wilkinson 3 130 
 
 Cross V. Eeed 29 244 
 
 Cross V. Zellerbach 8 714 
 
 Crowell V. Brown 10 337 
 
 Crowley v. Strouse 38 456 
 
 Crozier's Estate, In re 4 240 
 
 Crozier's Estate, In re 4 412 
 
 Cruz V. County of Los An- 
 geles 3 872 
 
 Cummings v. Cummiugs .... 13 322 
 
 Cummings v. Cummings .... 14 562 
 
 Cummings v. Marsh 6 1 
 
 Cunningham v. Norton 40 491 
 
 Curran V. Kennedy 24 276 
 
 Curry v. Holland ; — 40 4 
 
 Curtis V. Underwood 36 397 
 
 Curtis' Estate, In re 2 46 
 
 Curtiss V. Baehman 40 801 
 
 D 
 
 Daggett V. Gray 40 959 
 
 Daggett V. Vanderslice 13 402 
 
 Dailey, In re 46 1113 
 
 Dalmazzo V. Drysdale 21 553 
 
 Dalzell V. McGill 37 145 
 
 Damsguard v. Gunnoldison . . 7 772 
 
 Daniels v. Gualala Mill Co. . 6 315 
 
 Darden T. Callaghan 31 263 
 
 Daubenbiss v. White 31 360 
 
 Davey v. Southern Pac. Co. 45 170 
 
 Davis V. Eames 35 566 
 
 Davis V. Lamb 35 306 
 
 Davis V. McGrew 8 618 
 
 Davis V. Porter 4 647 
 
 Davis V. Wallace 38 1107 
 
 Daw V. Niles 33 1114 
 
 De Arnaz v. Jaynes 34 223 
 
 De Camp v. Bryson. 39 861 
 
 Decker v. Perry 35 1017 
 
 De Couts V. Lafkin 41 882 
 
 De Guyer v. Banning 25 252 
 
 Dehail v. City of Los An- 
 geles 51 27 
 
 De La Cuesta v. Calkins. . . • 41 1098 
 Delafield v. San Francisco & 
 
 S. M. R. Co 40 958 
 
 De Laveaga's Estate, In re. . 51 1099 
 
 De Leon's Estate, In re, ... 35 309 
 
 Le Long v. State 53 1128 
 
 De Long v. Warren 36 1009 
 
 De Long v. Warren 38 725 
 
 Dennery, In re 24 149 
 
 De Pena v. Trujillo 30 560 
 
 Derevan v. MacClean 20 131 
 
 Descalso v. Duane 33 328 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Desmond v. Fans 33 457 
 
 De Witt V. Superior Court of 
 
 Fresno County 47 871 
 
 Dietz V. Kucks 45 832 
 
 Dietz V. Mission Transfer 
 
 Co 25 428 
 
 Diggins V. INtahon 42 1066 
 
 Diggs V. Porteus 33 447 
 
 Dimmick v. Dimmick 30 548 
 
 Dingley v. Greene 6 81 
 
 Disbarment of Coffey, In re 53 1128 
 
 Diss V. Long 26 515 
 
 Dixon v. Pluns 31 931 
 
 Dixon V. Pluns 35 1047 
 
 Doane v. Barber 9 89 
 
 Doggett V. Bellows 6 421 
 
 Donahue v. Mariposa Land 
 
 & Mining Co 4 881 
 
 Donnells v. Martin 35 437 
 
 Doolan v. Cunningham . . 4 1193, 
 
 Dooley v. Seventeen Thou- 
 sand and Five Hundred 
 
 Head of Sheep 35 1011 
 
 Dore V. Dougherty 4 1067 
 
 Dorland v. Bernal 4 1065 
 
 Dorland v. Bernal 7 792 
 
 Dorland v. Bernal 21 435 
 
 Dorman v. Soto 36 588 
 
 Doty V. Whittle 11 761 
 
 Dougherty v. Fair 10 674 
 
 Doughty, Appeal of 40 18 
 
 Dow V. Nason 37 656 
 
 Dow V. Nason 38 54 
 
 Dowling V. Adams 41 413 
 
 Dowling V. Altschul 33 495 
 
 Downing v. Mulcahy 56 466 
 
 Drew V. Cole 82 229 
 
 Drew V. Hides 35 563 
 
 Drew V. Rogers 34 1081 
 
 Duane v. Neumann 2 274 
 
 Duane v. Neumann 2 410 
 
 Duffy V. Wilhoit 35 651 
 
 Duffy V. Wilhoit. 38 54 
 
 Duncan v. Times-Mirror Co. 42 148 
 
 Duncan v. Times-Mirror Co. 52 651 
 
 Duulop V. Kennedy 34 92 
 
 Dunphy V. Heinmann 17 5 
 
 Dunphy V. Potrero Co 4 1171 
 
 Dupuy V. Macleod 33 1115 
 
 Durkee v. Central Pac. R. 
 
 Co 9 99 
 
 Dyer v. Heydenfeldt 4 1187 
 
 Dyer V. Martin 26 1105 
 
 Easterbrook v. City & Coun- 
 ty of San Francisco 44 800 
 
 Easterby v. City of Napa.. 8 600 
 
 Baton V. Metz 40 947 
 
 Ede V. Cuneo 55 388 
 
 Ede V. Cuneo 55 772 
 
 Egger V. Rhodes 37 1037 
 
 Electric Imp. Co. v. San .Tos6 
 
 & S. C. R. Co 31 455 
 
 EUedge v. National City & 
 
 O. R. Co 34 852 
 
 Ellis V. Benuet 3 801 
 
 Ellis V. Judson 10 127 
 
TABLE OF CASES. 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Ellis V. Tulare County 44 575 
 
 Ellis V. Woodburn 24 893 
 
 Bmeric v. Alvai-ado 3 105 
 
 EmhofE V. McMann 23 302 
 
 Eppinger v. Kendrick 44 234 
 
 Erewaldsen, Ex parte 24 743 
 
 Ei-tle V. Placer Co 44 229 
 
 JJshelman v. Henrietta Vine- 
 yard Co 36 775 
 
 Eshelman v. Malter 36 775 
 
 Esrey v. Southern Pac. Co.. 35 310 
 
 Estudillo T. Aguirre 5 109 
 
 Etchepare v. Aguirre 27 929 
 
 Etter V. Hughes 41 790 
 
 Etzenhouser v. Freeman. ... 24 927 
 Eureka Lake & Yuba Canal 
 Co. V. Superior Court of the 
 
 County of Yuba 5 493 
 
 iEvans V. Bailey 6 424 
 
 Evans v. Ross 8 88 
 
 • "Everett v. Loa Angeles Con- 
 sol. Electric Ry. Co 43 210 
 
 Excelsior Pav. Co. v. Leach 34 116 
 
 Excelsior Pav. Co. v. Pierce 33 727 
 
 Eyre v. Frey 28 782 
 
 Eyre v. Hirshf eld 28 782 
 
 Eyre v. I-evy 28 782 
 
 -Eyre v. Scott 28 782 
 
 T'aber V. Cathrin 2 879 
 
 Fairbanks v. Rollins 54 79 
 
 Fanning v. Leviston 21 121 
 
 Farley V. Moran 31 158 
 
 I'armers' & Merchants' Bank 
 
 of Stockton V. Richards. .. 53 439 
 
 Farnsworth v. Hinton 46 1113 
 
 Farnsworth v. Wixom 5 506 
 
 Farnum v. Hefner 16 324 
 
 Teeley's Estate, In re 3 876 
 
 Ferguson v. McBean 35 559 
 
 Terrugeard v. Superior Court 5 612 
 
 Fette V. Lane 37 914 
 
 T^ield V. Andrada 37 180 
 
 Finley, Ex parte 4 881 
 
 First Nat. Bank of Chicago 
 V. California Nat. Bank of 
 
 San Diego 35 639 
 
 Tirst Nat. Bank of Ft. Col- 
 lins V. Hughes 46 272 
 
 First Nat. Bank of San Di- 
 ego V. Nason 47 1097 
 
 First Nat. Bank of Santa 
 
 Monica v. Kowalsky 27 783 
 
 First Nat. Bank of Santa 
 
 Monica v. Kowalsky 31 1133 
 
 First Nat. Bank of South 
 
 Bend v. Kelso 40 427 
 
 Fisher V. Hopkins 33 438 
 
 Fisher's Estate, In re 42 237 
 
 Fisk V. Lee 12 255 
 
 Fiske V. Casey 36 668 
 
 Fitzgerald V. Fitzgerald 36 947 
 
 Fitzgerald v. Livermore .... 13 167 
 
 Fitzgibbon v. Laumeister. . . 51 1078 
 
 Fitzpatrick v. Bryan 7 838 
 
 Fladung v. Dawson 34 1107 
 
 IFlagg V. St. Elmo Invest- 
 ment Co 30 579 
 
 Vol. Page 
 Fleckenstein v. Placer Coun- 
 ty 37 931 
 
 Fleming V. Hawley 4 576 
 
 Fletcher v. Northcross 32 328 
 
 Flick V. Bell 42 813 
 
 Flynn v. Dougherty 26 831 
 
 Foerst v. Masonic Hall Ass'n 
 
 of South San Francisco. . . 31 903 
 Fogel V. San Francisco & S. 
 
 M. Ry. Co 42 565 
 
 Fong Yen Yon, Ex parte... 19 500 
 
 Foote V. Hayes 39 601 
 
 Ford V. Cauhape 42 922 
 
 Ford V. Kenton 40 1031 
 
 Foulke V. De Witt 52 476 
 
 Fountain V. Hoppe 36 389 
 
 Fowler v. Heinrath 2 248 
 
 Fowler's Estate, In re 20 81 
 
 Fox V. Dyer 22 257 
 
 Fox V. Grayson 53 932 
 
 Fox V. Hale & Norcross Sil- 
 
 ver-Mln. Co 44 1023 
 
 Fox V. Hale & Norcross Sil- 
 
 ver-Min. Co 53 32 
 
 Fox V. Hale & Norcross Sil- 
 
 ver-Min. Co 53 169 
 
 Franke v. Franke 31 571 
 
 Frankel v. Deidesheimer ... 15 429 
 
 Frankish v. Smith 19 701 
 
 Franz v. Bieler 56 249 
 
 Eraser v. Nelson 4 105 
 
 Frassi v. McDonald 55 772 
 
 Fredericks v. Judah 11 133 
 
 Freeman v. Griswold 34 327 
 
 Freeman v. Hensley 30 792 
 
 Fresno Loan & Savings 
 
 Bank v. Husted 49 195 
 
 Fresno Milling Co. v. Fresno 
 
 Canal & Irrigation Co 36 412 
 
 Frink v. Roe 7 481 
 
 G 
 
 Gage V. Downey 19 113 
 
 Gainsley v. Gainslev 44 456 
 
 Gallaudett v. Carroll 52 1131 
 
 Galloway v. Jones 13 712 
 
 Galvin v. Gualala Mill Co. . . 33 94 
 
 Ganahl V. Sober 5 80 
 
 Garbe v. Wilks 38 499 
 
 Garber v. Giannella 30 841 
 
 Garido v. American Cent. 
 
 Ins. Co 8 512 
 
 Gates V. McLean 9 938 
 
 George v. Gabral 55 1099 
 
 George v. Hayden 55 1099 
 
 Georgeson v. Consumers' 
 
 Lumber Co 31 257 
 
 Gerke v. Cameron 50 434 
 
 German v. Brown 33 58 
 
 Gill V. Dunham 34 68 
 
 Gilman V. Curtis 3 114 
 
 Gilson V. Robinson 7 428 
 
 Girduer v. Beswick 8 11 
 
 Gnekow v. Confer 48 331 
 
 Goetz V. Goldbaum 37 646 
 
 Golden State & Miners' Iron 
 
 Works V. Muir 8 836 
 
 Goldtree v. McAllister 23 207 
 
 Gold tree v. Thompson 15 359 
 
10 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Goldtree v. Thompson 20 414 
 
 GoUin T. Lyle 31 456 
 
 Gooby V. Hanson.. 11 489 
 
 Good V. Taylor 23 220 
 
 Goodbody v. Mertens 27 22 
 
 Goodrich v. Loupe 46 77 
 
 Goodwin v. Burney 14 676 
 
 Gordon v. San Diego 32 885 
 
 Gordon Hardware Co. v. San 
 
 Francisco & S. R. R. Co. 22 406 
 Gordon Hardware Co. v. San 
 
 Francisco & S. R. R. Co. 23 1025 
 
 Gould T. Monroe 35 763 
 
 Gove V. Board of Sup'rs of 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco 54 1130 
 
 Graham v. Franke 38 455 
 
 Grange y.' Gough 4 1177 
 
 Granger v. Bourn 7 760 
 
 Grangers' Bank of Califor- 
 nia T. Shuey 55 682 
 
 Grangers' Bank of Califor- 
 nia T. Superior Court of 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco 33 1095 
 
 Grant v. De Lamori 14 314 
 
 Grant v. Dreyfus.; 52 1074 
 
 Graves v. Superior Court 
 
 San Bernardino Co 4 200 
 
 Gray v. Long 37 380 
 
 Gray V. Lucas 47 687 
 
 Gray v. Mahon, three cases 47 1097 
 
 Gray v. Richardson 55 603 
 
 Green, Appeal of 33 456 
 
 Green v. Barney 36 1026 
 
 Green V. State 12 683 
 
 Greenberg v. California Bi- 
 tuminous Rock Co 33 192 
 
 Greer v. Tripp 12 301 
 
 Gregory v. Allison 19 233 
 
 Gregory v. Gregory 32 531 
 
 Gregory v. Keating 18 389 
 
 Gregory v. Keating 22 1084 
 
 Grider's Estate, In re 21 532 
 
 Griffin V. Scooffy 33 88 
 
 Griffith Co. v. City of Los 
 
 Angeles 54 383 
 
 Grimes v. Linscott 40 421 
 
 Groezinger v. Sutro 46 1113 
 
 Grogan v. Nolan 36 397 
 
 Gross V. Superior Court of 
 the City and County of 
 
 San Francisco 10 122 
 
 Grunwald v. Freese 34 73 
 
 Gruss v. Robertson 37 772 
 
 Guardian Fire & Life Assur. 
 
 Co. V. Thompson 9 2 
 
 Gurnen v. Garrity 10 118 
 
 Gutierrez V. Brinkerhoff 1 482 
 
 Gutierrez v. Hebbard 39 935 
 
 Glittery v. Wishon 48 2 
 
 Gwin V. Sweetser 30 778 
 
 Gwinn v. Hamilton 7 837 
 
 H 
 
 Haas V. Mutual Relief Ass'n. 
 
 of Petaluma 42 237 
 
 Haas V. Whittier 21 547 
 
 Vol. 
 
 Haas' Estate, In re 32 
 
 Hackley v. Craig 3 
 
 Haight V. Sexton 42 
 
 Haight T. Ti-yon 34 
 
 Haines v. Stilwell 40 
 
 Hale's Estate, In re 53 
 
 Haley v. Haley 14 
 
 Haley v. Merced County... 55 
 
 Haley v. Parker 47 
 
 Haley v. Shepherd 7 
 
 Hale & Norcross Silver-Min. 
 
 Co. V. Fox 52 
 
 Hall V. Cole 88 
 
 Hall V. County of Los An- 
 geles 13 
 
 Hall v. Hebard 8 
 
 Hall V. Rice 2 
 
 Hamill v. Littner 7 
 
 Hamilton v. Bates 35 
 
 Hamilton's Estate, In re. . . . 52 
 
 Hamlin v. Phillips 33 
 
 Hammel v. Stone 14 
 
 Hanson v. Hanson 20 
 
 Hanson V. VoU 21 
 
 Hardwick v. Tyrrell 1 
 
 Hardy v. Sexton, i 5 
 
 Harmon v. San Fransisco & 
 
 S. R. Co 22 
 
 Harmon v. San Francisco & 
 
 S. R. Co 28 
 
 Harney v. Farren 26 
 
 Harper v. Anderson 37 
 
 Harrigan v. Bolte. 8 
 
 Harris v. Careaga 2 
 
 Harris v. More 5 
 
 Harris v. Sutherland 19 
 
 Harrison v. McCormick. . . . 9 
 
 Hart V. Kimberly 46 
 
 Hart V. Western Union Tel. 
 
 Co 4 
 
 Harter v. Donahoe 9 
 
 Hartshorne v. McMuUen. ... 27 
 
 Harvey, In re 32 
 
 Hastings v. Young 17 
 
 Haumeister v. Porter 2 
 
 Haumeister v. Porter 16 
 
 Hawes v. Green 3 
 
 Hawes' Estate, In re 11 
 
 Hawkins v. Morehead 34 
 
 Hawley v. Gray Brothers 
 
 Artificial Stone Paving Co. 42 
 Hawley v. Gray Brothers 
 
 Artificial Stone Paving Co. 48 
 
 Hay ford v. Wallace 46 
 
 Hayford v. Wallace 46 
 
 Hay nes v. Backman 31 
 
 Haynes v. Backman 31 
 
 Haysmeister v. Porter 3 
 
 Healey v. Norton 41 
 
 Hefferman v. Superior Court 
 
 of City and County of San 
 
 Francisco 33 
 
 Hegard v. California Ins. Co. 11 
 
 Heidt v. Minor 26 
 
 Heilbron v. Campbell 23 
 
 Heilbron v. Campbell 23 
 
 Heilbron v. Campbell 24 
 
 Heilbron v. Emigrant Ditch 
 
 Co 17 
 
 Heilbron v. Last Chance W. 
 
 D. Co 9 
 
 Page 
 327 
 494 
 637 
 712 
 33:i 
 
 1128 
 92 
 
 1099 
 
 1097 
 635 
 
 1181 
 894 
 
 854 
 507 
 889 
 707 
 304 
 1131 
 331 
 
 67a 
 
 736 
 971 
 896 
 162 
 
 407 
 
 1024 
 792 
 926 
 184 
 41 
 159 
 701 
 114 
 618 
 
 G57 
 651 
 22 
 567 
 .530 
 888 
 187 
 496 
 220 
 223 
 
 457 
 
 1114 
 29a 
 301 
 745 
 746 
 123 
 
 1080 
 
 725- 
 594 
 629 
 122 
 1032 
 930 
 
 6S 
 
 456 
 
TABLE OF CASES. 
 
 11 
 
 Vol. 
 Heilbron v. People's Ditch 
 
 Co 17 
 
 Heim v. Butin 40 
 
 Heinlen v. Beans 12 
 
 Heinlen v. CenterTille & 
 
 Kingsbury Irrigation Ditch 
 
 Co 4 
 
 Heinlen v. Brlanger 3 
 
 Heintz v. Cooper 47 
 
 Hellingg, Appeal of 39 
 
 Helsel V. Seeger 34 
 
 Henion, Ex parte 55 
 
 Henrietta Vineyard Co. v. 
 
 Bshelman 36 
 
 Hensing's Estate, In re.... 31 
 
 Herberger v, Husmann .... 24 
 
 Herting v. Superior Court.. 10 
 
 Herzog v. Julien 4 
 
 Hewett V. Dean 25 
 
 Hewitt V. Dean 26 
 
 Heydenf eldt v. Jacobs 40 
 
 Heydenfeldt's Estate, In re 50 
 Heywood v. Berkeley Land 
 
 & Town Imp. Ass'n 11 
 
 Hibberd v. Mellville 33 
 
 Hibernia Savings & Loan 
 
 Soc. V. Mellwain 51 
 
 Hildreth v. Williams 33 
 
 Hilton v. Hanly 32 
 
 Hilton V. Heverin 11 
 
 Himmelman v. Henry 21 
 
 HImmelton v. Supreme Coun- 
 cil American Legion of 
 
 ' Honor 33 
 
 Hinckley v. Krug 34 
 
 Hinckley v. Stebbins 29 
 
 Hines v. Roadhouse 7 
 
 Hirschfeld v. Superior Court 
 
 of Tulare Co 8 
 
 Hite V. Hite 55 
 
 Hite Gold Quartz Co. v. Ster- 
 
 niont Silver Min. Co 7 
 
 Hoagland v. State 22 
 
 Hobbs V. Nunn 11 
 
 Hodgdon v. Underbill 1 
 
 Hogan V. Burns 33 
 
 Hogan V. Sanders 14 
 
 Hogan V. Tyler 7 
 
 Hogins V. BoggSi 34 
 
 Hogue V. Oweri 23 
 
 Holbrooke v. Harrington ... 36 
 
 Holliday v. Holliday 53 
 
 Holmberg v. Hendy 10 
 
 Holmes v. Warren 9 
 
 Holmquist, Ex parte 27 
 
 Holzheier v. Hayes 52 
 
 Home for Care of Inebriates 
 
 v. Reis 27 
 
 Hook V. Hall 6 
 
 Hooper v. Patterson 32 
 
 Hooper v. Powers 4 
 
 Hopkins v. Wiard 13 
 
 Hoppe V. Hoppe 36 
 
 Horton v. Dominguez 8 
 
 Horton v. Jack 37 
 
 Houghton V. Allen 14 
 
 Howard v. Stratton 2 
 
 Howe V. Halsey 54 
 
 Howell V. Howell 37 
 
 Howland v. Kreter 41 
 
 Huggins T. Handy 17 
 
 Page 
 
 69 
 
 39 
 
 169 
 
 417 
 129 
 360 
 788 
 237 
 326 
 
 775 
 578 
 
 1058 
 514 
 501 
 753 
 
 1101 
 493 
 
 1100 
 
 246 
 201 
 
 1099 
 
 1113 
 
 11 
 
 27 
 731 
 
 1130 
 
 118 
 
 52 
 
 837 
 
 273 
 900 
 
 120 
 142 
 
 32 
 897 
 631 
 677 
 454 
 653 
 876 
 365 
 
 42 
 394 
 
 71 
 
 1099 
 
 838 
 
 310 
 
 422 
 514 
 1172 
 689 
 389 
 273 
 652 
 641 
 264 
 748 
 772 
 332 
 533 
 
 Vol. 
 
 Hughes V. Mendocino Co... 4 
 
 Hughes V. Parsons 6 
 
 Hughes V. Thompson 16 
 
 Hulsey v. Bryan 7 
 
 Humboldt Sav. & L. Soc. v. 
 
 Wennerhold 20 
 
 Humphreys v. Hopkins 20 
 
 Hunt v. Swyney 33 
 
 Hunter v. Hubert 39 
 
 Hunter v. Milam 41 
 
 Huntington v. Russell 8 
 
 Huse V. Den 24 
 
 Huse V. Den 30 
 
 Hutchings, Ex parte 16 
 
 Hutchinson v. McNally.... 23 
 
 Hutchinson v. Woodward. . 31 
 
 Hyde v. Boyle 24 
 
 Hynes v. Nelson 2 
 
 Hynes v. San Francisco & 
 
 N. P. R. Co i... 4 
 
 I 
 
 Ingerman v. Moore 25 
 
 Ingham v. Weed 48 
 
 Ingram v. Colgan 38 
 
 Irish V. Pauley 48 
 
 Irvine's Estate, In re 33 
 
 Irwin V. McDowell 34 
 
 Israel v. Collins 31 
 
 Iverson v. Jones 5 
 
 J 
 
 Jack v. Saunders 4 
 
 Jackson v. Logan 5 
 
 Jackson v. Puget Sound 
 
 Lumber Co 52 
 
 .Tacob V. Carter 36 
 
 Jacobs V. Walker 33 
 
 James v. Pulkerth 7 
 
 Janes v. De Azevedo 30 
 
 Jaynes v. Superior Court. ... 12 
 Jenkins v. Gamewell Fire 
 
 Alarm Tel. Co 31 
 
 Jensen v. Hunter 41 
 
 Jewell V. Pierce 52 
 
 Jewell V. Pierce 52 
 
 Johnson v. Greenberg 37 
 
 Johnson v. Hancock 4 
 
 Johnson v. Johnson 35 
 
 Johnson v. Thomas 43 
 
 .Johnson v. Walden 12 
 
 Johnston v. Brown 47 
 
 Johnston v. County of Los 
 
 Angeles 47 
 
 Johnston v. Sawyer 47 
 
 Johnston v. Shore 47 
 
 Jones V. Chalfant 31 
 
 Jones V. Desmond 6 
 
 Jones V. Iverson 31 
 
 Jones V. Los Angeles & P. 
 
 Ry. Co 37 
 
 Jones V. McGarvey 56 
 
 Jones V. Meyer 1 
 
 Jones V. Shuey 40 
 
 Judkins v. Elliott 12 
 
 Judson T. Lyf ord 23 
 
 Page 
 23C 
 380 
 532 
 
 838 
 
 553 
 713 
 854 
 534 
 332 
 511 
 791 
 
 1104 
 234 
 132 
 931 
 
 1060 
 36 
 
 31 
 
 275 
 318 
 366 
 321 
 
 1128 
 708 
 
 1126 
 626 
 
 487 
 670 
 
 838 
 381 
 91 
 768 
 1104 
 117 
 
 570 
 
 14 
 
 658 
 
 1131 
 141 
 
 1093 
 637 
 578 
 257 
 
 1097 
 
 374 
 1097 
 1097 
 257 
 420 
 625 
 
 656 
 896 
 892 
 
 17 
 116 
 
 58 
 
12 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 Vol. Page 
 Juzix V. City and County of 
 San Francisco 7 416 
 
 K 
 
 Kahn v. Bauer 12 477 
 
 Kahn v. Board of Sup'rs of 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco 12 478 
 
 Kalin V. Board of Sup'rs of 
 City and County of San 
 
 ;irrancisco 25 403 
 
 Kahn v. Brilliant 35 309 
 
 Kasten v. Paxton 7 490 
 
 Keating V. Edgar 1 155 
 
 Keating v. Edgar 3 594 
 
 Kelleher V. Kenny 4 1095 
 
 Kellenberger v. Market St. 
 
 Cable Ky. Go 33 90 
 
 Keller v. Fink 37 411 
 
 Kelley v. Owens 30 596 
 
 Kelley V. Owens 31 14 
 
 Kelley v. Sersanous 46 299 
 
 Kellogg V. Colgan 23 52G 
 
 Kelly V. Brown 8 38 
 
 Kelly V. Hearst 48 1114 
 
 Kelly V. Lemberger 46 8 
 
 Kelly V. Wilson 11 244 
 
 Kelsey v. Merced County . . 55 1099 
 
 Kendall V. Earl..: 44 791 
 
 Kennedy v* Conroy ........ 44 795 
 
 Kennedy v. Gift 8 526 
 
 Kennedy & Shaw Lumber 
 
 Co. V. Taylor 31 1122 
 
 Kennedy's Estate, In re... 36 1030 
 
 Kenney v. Parks 54 251 
 
 Kerns r. Dean 4 408 
 
 Kerns v. Dean 6 704 
 
 Kerr v. Kerr 13 654 
 
 Kerry v. Pacific Marine Sup- 
 ply Co 54 262 
 
 Ketchum V. Barber ' 12 251 
 
 Ketchum v. County of Plu- 
 mas 10 114 
 
 King's Estate, In re 36 806 
 
 Kirby v. Harrington... 13 218 
 Kirby v. London & San 
 
 Francisco Bank 5 236 
 
 Kirk V. Roberts 31 620 
 
 Kittle V. McMuUen 25 58 
 
 Klauber v. San Diego Street- 
 car Co 34 516 
 
 Klauber V. Vigneron 32 248 
 
 Klumpke v. Ackerson 11 31 
 
 Knapp, In re 16 520 
 
 Knight V. Pacific Coast 
 
 Stage Co 34 868 
 
 Knight T. Tripp 49 838 
 
 Knock V. Bunnell 21 961 
 
 Knox, In re 26 832 
 
 Kowalsky, In re 35 77 
 
 Kraft V. Wilson 37 790 
 
 Kreiss, In re 28 806 
 
 Krouse V. Woodward 42 1084 
 
 Kuscbel v. Hunter 50 397 
 
 L 
 
 Labish v. Hardy 23 123 
 
 Lafargue v. Harrison 9 259 
 
 Vol. 
 
 Lamet v. Miller 11 
 
 Lancaster v. Maxwell 37 
 
 Landis v. Morrissey 10 
 
 Lang V. Specht 5 
 
 Lang V. Superior Court. ... 12 
 
 Larue v. Groezinger 24 
 
 La Societe Franeaise 
 
 D'Bpargnes et de Prevoy- 
 
 ance Mutuelle, In re 56 
 
 La Societe Franeaise 
 
 D'Epargnes et de Prevoy- 
 
 anee Mutuelle t. Fishel... 10 
 
 Lasserot v. Gamble 46 
 
 Laswell, In re 4 
 
 Lattin v. Wilcox 29 
 
 Laver v. Hotaling 46 
 
 Lawrence v. Boyd 9 
 
 Lawrence v. Getchell 2 
 
 Lawrence v. Getchell 4 
 
 Layson v. Spencer 53 
 
 Learned v. Castle 4 
 
 Lee, Ex parte 21 
 
 Lee, Ex parte 23 
 
 Lee V. McCarthy 35 
 
 Leedom v. Hall 49 
 
 Leek v. McClure 22 
 
 Leet V. Board of Sup'rs of 
 
 Kern County 47 
 
 Lehman v. Schmidt 22 
 
 Lehman v. Schmidt 24 
 
 Leonis-v. LeflBngwell 55 
 
 Leonis' Estate v. Leffiugwell 55 
 
 Leszynsky v. Meyer 53 
 
 Letellier's Estate, In re.... 15 
 
 Leverone v. Hildreth 42 
 
 Levins v. Rovengo 12 
 
 Levy V. Baldwin 7 
 
 Levy V. Burkle 14 
 
 Levy V. Everett 31 
 
 Lewin v. Allison 51 
 
 Lewis V. Adams 7 
 
 Lewis V. Adams 11 
 
 Lewis V. Colgan 44 
 
 Light V. Richardson 31 
 
 Lilienthal v. Ballon 55 
 
 Lillis v. People's Ditch Co. 29 
 
 Lillis v. People's Ditch Co. 34 
 
 Ling, In re 7 
 
 Lingard v. Beta Theta Pi 
 
 Hall Ass'n 56 
 
 Link V. .Tarvis 33 
 
 Li Po Tai's Estate, In re. . 39 
 
 Lippert v. Lasar 33 
 
 Lippman, Ex parte 35 
 
 Li Tai Wing v. Freese 39 
 
 Littlehal v. Wilhoit 35 
 
 Uttlehead v. Wilhoit 38 
 
 Livingston v. Conant 51 
 
 Livingston v. Widber 47 
 
 Locey v. American Cent. 
 
 Ins. Co 11 
 
 Locey v. Hartford Fire Ins. 
 
 Co 11 
 
 Loftus V. Fischer 50 
 
 Loftus V. Fisher 46 
 
 Longnecker v. Creditors.... 17 
 
 Loose V. Stanford 44 
 
 Lord V. Thomas 27 
 
 Lord V. Thomas 36 
 
 Lorenz v. Jacobs 3 
 
 Page 
 744 
 207 
 261 
 612 
 416 
 45 
 
 787 
 
 395 
 917 
 886 
 228 
 
 1070 
 455 
 746 
 544 
 
 1073 
 191 
 
 1136 
 40 
 
 1034 
 222 
 
 1151 
 
 595 
 973 
 120 
 897 
 897 
 703 
 849 
 317 
 343 
 683 
 564 
 111 
 1099 
 779 
 837 
 1081 
 1123 
 251 
 780 
 715 
 660 
 
 58 
 206 
 
 30 
 797 
 557 
 
 30 
 651 
 
 54 
 859 
 247 
 
 791 
 
 791 
 
 1100 
 
 1113 
 
 220 
 
 1058 
 
 410 
 
 372 
 
 654 
 
TABLE OF CASES. 
 
 13 
 
 Vol. Page 
 Iios Angeles Cemetery Ass'n 
 
 V. City of Los Angeles. . 32 240 
 Los Angeles County v. 
 
 Reyes 32 233 
 
 Los Angeles Farming & Mill- 
 ing Co. V. Ho£E 34 518 
 
 Los Angeles Sav. Bank v. 
 
 Hinton 32 6 
 
 Lou Ah Sun, Ex parte 7 305 
 
 Love V. Anchor Raisin Vine- 
 yard Co..... 45 1044 
 
 Low V. Burton 14 683 
 
 Lowe V. Woods 40 1047 
 
 Lowenthal, In re 3 657 
 
 Lowenthal, In re 37 526 
 
 Lower Kings River Recla- 
 mation Dist. No. 531 V. 
 
 Hames 39 635 
 
 Lower Kings River Recla- 
 mation Dist. No. 531 V. 
 
 Phillips 39 634 
 
 Lower Kings River Recla- 
 mation Dist. No. 531 V. 
 
 Phillips 41 337 
 
 Lower Kings River Recla- 
 mation Dist. No. 531 V. 
 
 Wood 39 634 
 
 Lower Kings River Recla- 
 mation Dist. No. 531 V. 
 
 Wood 41 337 
 
 Lower Kings River W. D. 
 
 Co. V. Heilbron 17 69 
 
 Luce V. San Diego Land & 
 
 Town Co 37 390 
 
 Luco V. Bushyhead 14 368 
 
 Luco V. Commercial Bank of 
 
 San Diego 8 274 
 
 Luco V. De Toro 34 516 
 
 Luco V. Toro 18 866 
 
 Ludy V. Colusa County 41 300 
 
 Ludy V. Colusa County .... 45 166 
 
 Lutz V. Rothschild 38 360 
 
 Lux V. Haggin 4 919 
 
 Lux V. Haggin 4 938 
 
 Lux V. Haggin 13 654 
 
 Lux's Estate, In re 35 347 
 
 Lux's Estate. In re 35 639 
 
 Lyford v. Dulip 51 1099 
 
 Lyman v. McCarthy Co... 43 971 
 
 Lyons V. Knowles 32 883 
 
 Lytle Creek Water Co. v. 
 Perdew 2 732 
 
 M 
 
 McAvoy V. Bothwell 12 161 
 
 McCarty v. Owens 41 861 
 
 McCauley v. Cunningham. . 7 646 
 
 Macomber v. Conradt 37 382 
 
 Macomber v. Conradt 37 901 
 
 McCormick v. Fitzpatrick. . 4 1194 
 
 McCormick v. Sheridan.... 20 24 
 
 McCormick v. Sheridan... 20 26 
 McCormick v. Springfield Ins. 
 
 Co 24 1005 
 
 McCormick v. Union Ins. Co. 24 1005 
 
 McCoy V. Southern Pac. Co. 26 629 
 
 McCroskey v. Ladd 28 216 
 
 McCue V. Tunstead 3 863 
 
 McDaniel v. Cummings.... 22 216 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 McDaniel v. Pattison 27 651 
 
 McDonald, Ex parte 17 234 
 
 McDonald V. Huff 18 243 
 
 McDonald v. Mayor, etc., of 
 
 City of Placerville 55 600 
 
 McDonald V. Peters 55 1099 
 
 McDonald v. Southern Cal- 
 ifornia R. Co 41 812 
 
 McDowell v. Creditors 37 203 
 
 McDowell T. Levy 8 857 
 
 McFadden v. Mason 3 8y3 
 
 McGee v. San Francisco & 
 
 N. P. Ry. Co 43 1106 
 
 McGhee v. City of San Jose 7 188 
 
 McGrath v. Hyde 21 948 
 
 McHarry v. Stewart 35 141 
 
 Machinery Supply Co. v. 
 
 Duncan 54 1130 
 
 Mclntyre v. Southern Cali- 
 fornia Motor Road Co... 35 991 
 
 McKay v. Joy 9 940 
 
 McKay v. .Toy 10 258 
 
 McKay v. McKay 52 1131 
 
 McKenzie v. Gilmore 33 262 
 
 McKenzie v. Joost 45 1056 
 
 McKinney v. Roberts 8 3 
 
 McLaughlin V. Menotti 39 207 
 
 McMahon v. Thomas 39 783 
 
 McNally V. Connolly 9 169 
 
 McNamara v. Hammerslag. . 2 391 
 McPherson v. San Joaquin 
 
 County 56 802 
 
 McRae v. Argonaut Land & 
 
 Development Co... 54 743 
 
 McVerry v. Hitchcock 4 1144 
 
 McVey v. Bean 38 515 
 
 Madden v. Occidental & Ori- 
 ental S. S. Co 24 169 
 
 Magee, Appeal of 32 241 
 
 Magee v. North Pac. Coast 
 
 R. Co 20 709 
 
 Maglinchey v. Southern Pac. 
 
 Co 44 1021 
 
 Magnolia & H. Fruit Can- 
 nery V. Guerne 31 363 
 
 Mahoney v. San Francisco 
 
 & S. M. Ry. Co 43 518 
 
 Main St. Sav. Bank & Trust 
 Co. V. Board of Sup'rs of 
 
 Los Angeles County 34 437 
 
 Main St. Sav. Bank & Trust 
 
 Co. V. Hinton 32 6 
 
 Mair v. Forbes 21 552 
 
 Makinney, Ex parte 3 253 
 
 Malic V. Fox 33 441 
 
 Mallagh v. Mallagh 16 535 
 
 Mallov V. Hibernia Sav. & 
 
 Loan Soc 21 525 
 
 Malone v. Johnson 47 579 
 
 Maloney v. Hefer 15 763 
 
 Malville V. Kappeler 37 934 
 
 Mancello v. Bellrude 11 501 
 
 Manning v. Den 24 1092 
 
 Manor v. Davis 4 400 
 
 Mansfield v. Stem 4 777 
 
 March v. Barnet 51 20 
 
 Marion v. Board of Educa- 
 tion of City of Oakland 32 644 
 
 Markham v. Fowler 17 228 
 
 Marks v. Bodie Bank 8 807 
 
 Marsh v. Hendy 27 647 
 
14 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 Vol. 
 
 Marshall, In re 15 
 
 Marshall v. Keefe 34 
 
 Marten, Ex parte 48 
 
 Martin v. Hill 3 
 
 Martin v. Hill 4 
 
 Martin v. Jacobs 3 
 
 Martin v. Splivalo 21 
 
 Martin v. Vanderhoof 7 
 
 Marj'sville v. N. B. G. M. 
 
 Co 5 
 
 Masterson v. Clark 41 
 
 Matthews v. Bull 47 
 
 Matthews v. Jones 28 
 
 Matts V. Borba 37 
 
 Maxson v. Superior Court of 
 
 Madera County 54 
 
 Maxwell v. Board of Sup'rs 
 
 of Los Angeles County. . 32 
 
 May V. Steele 9 
 
 Meade v. Watson 8 
 
 Meade's Estate, In re 49 
 
 Mechanic's Institute v. Firth 49 
 
 Meeker t. Shuster 47 
 
 Megginson v. Turner 55 
 
 Meherin v. Saunders 56 
 
 Melius V. Melius 8 
 
 Mendeuhall r. Rose 33 
 
 Merced Co. v. Hicks 7 
 
 Merced Co. v. Hicks, two 
 
 cases 7 
 
 Merrick v. Superior Court. . 15 
 Meserve v. Pomona Land & 
 
 Water Co 34 
 
 Meserve v. Pomona Land & 
 
 Water Co 34 
 
 Meyer, Ex parte 40 
 
 Meyer v. Brown 4 
 
 Meyer v. Meyer 52 
 
 Meyers v. Nelson 44 
 
 Meyers v. Trujillo 30 
 
 Meysan v. Chabrie 5 
 
 Meysan v. Chabrie 7 
 
 Middleton, Ex parte 20 
 
 Mietzsch v. Berkhout 35 
 
 Miles V. Woodward 47 
 
 Millan v. Hood 30 
 
 Millard v. Supreme Council. . 21 
 
 Millbrae Co. v. Taylor 37 
 
 Miller, Ex parte 24 
 
 Miller v. Bensinger 31 
 
 Miller t. Dunn 11 
 
 Miller v. Pi-ice 39 
 
 Miller v. Eea 15 
 
 Miller v. Waddingham .... 25 
 
 Miller's Estate, In re 54 
 
 Millett V. Lagomarsino .... 38 
 
 Millich T. Gutternich 4 
 
 Milliken v. Houghton 4 
 
 Mini V. Mini 45 
 
 Mix V. San Diego & C. Ry. 
 
 Co 23 
 
 Modoc County v. Madden . . 53 
 Mokelumne & Campo Seco 
 
 Canal & Min. Co. v. Knoz 7 
 Monahan v. San Diego 
 
 County 29 
 
 Monroe v. Cooper 6 
 
 Monterey County v. Seegle- 
 
 ken 36 
 
 Montgomery v. Locke 11 
 
 Montgomery y. Merrill .... 3 
 
 Page 
 
 772 
 
 89 
 
 1114 
 861 
 
 1101 
 122 
 547 
 307 
 
 506 
 796 
 773 
 798 
 159 
 
 520 
 
 443 
 112 
 314 
 
 5 
 
 214 
 
 580 
 
 795 
 
 1110 
 
 1| 
 884' 
 
 180 I 
 
 181 ! 
 
 47 j 
 
 5081 
 
 5091 
 953 
 25 
 485 
 801 
 579 
 670 
 634 
 684 
 321 
 360 
 
 1107 
 825 
 235 
 743 
 578 
 604 
 781 
 55 
 688 
 
 1130 
 308 
 411 
 914 
 
 1044 
 
 935 
 268 
 
 415 
 
 417 
 
 378 
 
 515 
 874 
 123 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Montgomery v. Sayre 25 552 
 
 Montijo, In re 26 961 
 
 Moody V. Newmark 50 758 
 
 Mooney v! Detrick 22 1111 
 
 Moore v. Moore 7 688 
 
 Moore v. Moore 34 90 
 
 Moore V. Mott 34 345 
 
 Moore's Estate, In re 22 653 
 
 Moore's Estate, In re 26 787 
 
 Mooser v. Petersen 33 1086 
 
 Moran v. Farley 21 549 
 
 Moran v. Farley 21 1135 
 
 More V. Miller 53 1077 
 
 More V. Miller 54 263 
 
 More V. More 53 1077 
 
 Morgan v. Righetti 45 260 
 
 Morgans v. Adel 18 247 
 
 Morrow v. Norton 38 953 
 
 Mott V. Clarke 56 545 
 
 Mott V. Clarke 56 1130 
 
 Mott V. Mott 22 1140 
 
 Mowry v. Heney 24 301 
 
 Mowry v. Nunez 33 1122 
 
 Moyle V. Landers 21 1133 
 
 MuUally v. Irish-American 
 
 Benev. Soc 6 78 
 
 Murdock v. Clarke 24 272 
 
 Murdock's Estate, In re 53 792 
 
 Murphy, Ex parte 37 468 
 
 Murphy v. City of San Luis 
 
 Obispo 48 974 
 
 Murphy v. Pacific Bank... 39 218 
 
 Musser v. Gray 31 568 
 
 Mutter r. I. X. L. Lime Co. 42 1068 
 
 N 
 
 Naftzger V. Gregg 31 612 
 
 Naftzger v. Montague 31 612 
 
 Nash V. Kreling 56 260 
 
 Nash V. Kreling 56 262 
 
 Natoma Water & Min. Co. 
 
 V. Hancock 36 100 
 
 Neale V. Bardue. 45 853 
 
 Neihaus v. Morgan 45 255 
 
 Nelmes v. Wilson 34 341 
 
 Nelson v. Floyd 4 105 
 
 Nevin v. Thompson 35 160 
 
 Nevin v. Thompson 35 161 
 
 Newell V. Steele 42 637 
 
 Newman v. Bank of Cali- 
 
 ■ f ornia 15 43 
 
 Newman v. Buckman 39 209 
 
 Newman v. Maldonado 30 833 
 
 Newton v. Chiles 18 100 
 
 New Zealand Ins. Co. v. 
 
 Bradbeer 34 445 
 
 Nichol's Estate, In re 50 1072 
 
 Niles V. Edwards 27 296 
 
 Niosi T. Empire Steam 
 
 Laundry 46 153 
 
 Nissen v. Bendixen 3 404 
 
 Nissen v. Bendixen 9 111 
 
 Nobmanh v. Superior Court 
 
 of San Francisco 12 869 
 
 Noce T. Daveggio 4 495 
 
 Norris v. Norris 28 593 
 
 Noyes v. Southern Pac. R. 
 
 Co 24 927 
 
TABLK OF CASES. 
 
 15 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Numsen v. Levi 36 657 
 
 Nunan y. Superior Court. . 4 416 
 
 
 
 Oakland Bank of Savings v. 
 
 Appelgarth 4 1189 
 
 Oakland Water Front Co. v. 
 
 Dameron 50 1100 
 
 O'Brien, Ex parte 48 71 
 
 O'Brien v. Newman 20 132 
 
 O'Connor v. Flynn 7 188 
 
 O'Conor v. Clarke 44 482 
 
 Odd Fellows' Sav. Bank v. 
 
 Turman 30 966 
 
 Ogden V. Packard 35 642 
 
 Ohlandt v. Joost 53 213 
 
 Ohleyer v. Bunce 3 105 
 
 Ohm V. City and County of 
 
 San Francisco 25 155 
 
 Oliver V. Blair 5 917 
 
 Oliver Vv Blair 6 847 
 
 Oliver v. Blair 8 612 
 
 Olney V. Weske 5 611 
 
 Ontario Land & Imp. Co. v. 
 
 Howard 37 465 
 
 Ormsby v. De Borra 52 499 
 
 Orr V. Kern County 37 649 
 
 Osterman v. District Grand 
 
 Lodge No. 4, I. O. B. B.. . 43 412 
 
 OuUahan v. Baldwin 45 1032 
 
 Owens V. Heydenfeldt 6 423 
 
 P 
 
 Pacific Bridge Co. v. Bad- 
 ger 13 493 
 
 Pacific Bridge Co. v. Felton 13 493 
 Pacific Bridge Co. v. Jacobus 13 493 
 Pacific Bridge Co. v. Kel- 
 logg 13 493 
 
 Pacific Bridge Co. v. Patten 13 493 
 
 Pacific Bridge Co. v. Stevens 13 493 
 Pacific Bridge Co. v. Vin- 
 
 zent 13 493 
 
 Pacific Bridge Co. v. Wil- 
 liams 13 493 
 
 Pacific Coast Ry. Co. v. 
 
 Kamage 37 532 
 
 Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. 
 
 Beck 35 169 
 
 Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. 
 
 Fisher 35 77 
 
 Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. 
 
 Fisher 39 761 
 
 Pacific Trust Co. v. Dorsey.. 13 148 
 
 Packard v. Johnson 4 632 
 
 Packard v. Johnson 8 823 
 
 Packard v. Moss 4 638 
 
 Packer v. Doray 34 628 
 
 Paden v. Goldbaum 37 759 
 
 Paige V. Rocky Ford Canal 
 
 & Irrigation Co 4 1152 
 
 Painter v. Painter 36 865 
 
 Palmer v. Burnham 47 599 
 
 Palmer V. Burnham 52 1080 
 
 Palmer v. Galvin 6 . 99 
 
 Palmer v. St. Elmo Invest- 
 ment Co 29 507 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 R*lmer v. Snyder 5 609 
 
 Palmtag v. Raodhouse 34 111 
 
 Pardy v. Montgomery 18 330 
 
 Parker v. Bei-nal 7 634 
 
 Parker v. City and County 
 
 of San Francisco 3 816 
 
 Parker v. Long 38 47 
 
 Parker V. Roper 18 125 
 
 Partridge v. Owens 13 857 
 
 Partridge y. Shepard 12 351 
 
 Patent Brick Co. v. Wis- 
 
 singer 38 639 
 
 Patterson, In re 7 709 
 
 Patton V. Los Angeles & P. 
 
 R. Co 33 55 
 
 Patton V. Thomson 32 97 
 
 Paulsen, Ex parte 46 1114 
 
 Payne v. Kripp 4 426 
 
 Payne v. Pacific Bank 39 218 
 
 Pearson's Estate, In re 33 456 
 
 Pearson's Estate, In re 45 1062 
 
 Pellier v. Gillespie 4 1137 
 
 Pendergrass v. Burris 19 187 
 
 Penobsky, Appeal of 31 563 
 
 People V. Abbott. 4 769 
 
 People V. Abbott 34 500 
 
 People V. Acevedo 33 1099 
 
 People y. Ahern 26 530 
 
 People y. Ah Ung 28 272 
 
 People y. Alvord 4 676 
 
 People v. Bachmau 23 1090 
 
 People V. Balletto 40 108 
 
 People V. Bannister 34 710 
 
 People V. Becker 4 942 
 
 People V. Belai-des 48 624 
 
 People y. Bell 36 94 
 
 People y. Bell 36 95 
 
 People V. Bennett 3 897 
 
 People y. .Bennett 50 703 
 
 People V. Berman 7 3 
 
 People y. Biggins 3 853 
 
 People y. Blake 3 102 
 
 People y. Bowers 18 660 
 
 People y. Brady. 24 313 
 
 People V. Brady 36 949 
 
 People V. Brown 13 222 
 
 People y. Bruggy 26 756 
 
 People V. Bruggy 26 965 
 
 People V. Buckner 4 489 
 
 People V. Bulger 18 815 
 
 People V. Bulger 23 379 
 
 People V. Burdick 29 245 
 
 People V. Burt 3 653 
 
 People V. Button 38 200 
 
 People V. California Pac. R. 
 
 Co 23 310 
 
 People y. California Pac. R. 
 
 Co 38 912 
 
 People V. Cappola 56 248 
 
 People V. Carcopo 53 1128 
 
 People V. Carleton 4 763 
 
 People V. Carty 3 609 
 
 People V. Casteel 34 237 
 
 People V. Chum Cum Yook 27 614 
 People V. City and County of 
 
 San Francisco 15 747 
 
 People V. City and County of 
 
 San Francisco 16 228 
 
 People V. City of Riverside. . 9 662 
 
 People V. Clement 35 1022 
 
 People y. Clinton 21 426 
 
16 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People T. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People v. 
 People v. 
 People T. 
 People v. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People T. 
 People T. 
 People v. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People v. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People v. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People T. 
 People T. 
 People v. 
 People V. 
 People V. 
 People v. 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Comyns 45 1034 
 
 Connelly 38 42 
 
 Corn well 35 566 
 
 Growl 34 860 
 
 Cummings 46 1114 
 
 Curran 31 1116 
 
 Daniels 34 233 
 
 Davis 36 96 
 
 Denomme 56 98 
 
 Devon 8 93 
 
 Dillwood 39 438 
 
 Dole 51 945 
 
 Dwyer 4 451 
 
 Bister 3 884 
 
 Evans 41 444 
 
 Fagan 33 846 
 
 Forrestier 29 646 
 
 Fournier 47 1014 
 
 French 7 822 
 
 Frink 12 616 
 
 Fugitt 46 379 
 
 Gallagher 33 890 
 
 Garcia 40 114 
 
 Geiger 48 1114 
 
 Gilmore 53 806 
 
 Gonzales 56 804 
 
 Goodrich 38 954 
 
 Greene 16 200 
 
 Greenlaw 4 417 
 
 Grider 3 492 
 
 Hamilton 32 526 
 
 Harrison 22 1143 
 
 Hemme 22 1143 
 
 Hemme 24 313 
 
 Higgins 12 301 
 
 Hill 34 854 
 
 Holladay 5 798 
 
 HoUiday 19 835 
 
 Houston 40 756 
 
 Johns 40 806 
 
 Johnson 8 690 
 
 Jones 5 245 
 
 Jones 8 611 
 
 Jones 11 501 
 
 Jordan 3 101 
 
 Kelleher 16 705 
 
 Kilvington 36 13 
 
 Knight 43 6 
 
 Lapique 49 1117 
 
 Larsen 34 514 
 
 Lee 8 685 
 
 Lee Hung 1 155 
 
 Lee Hung 3 109 
 
 Lemon 38 905 
 
 Lowden 8 66 
 
 Lyle 4 977 
 
 McCarthy 18 862 
 
 McCarthy 21 426 
 
 McDonald 45 1005 
 
 McGinn 7 762 
 
 McNulty 28 816 
 
 McNuIty 33 900 
 
 McSweeney 38 743 
 
 Majors 2 744 
 
 Mitchell 28 788 
 
 Moran 31 853 
 
 Morasco 38 423 
 
 More 9 463 
 
 Morgan.. 28 576 
 
 Munn 7 790 
 
 Munroe 33 776 
 
 Vol. Page- 
 People V. Murray 4 504 
 
 People V. Nagle 29 640- 
 
 People V. Nieolsi 34 824 
 
 People V. Northern Pac. Ry. 
 
 Co 23 310' 
 
 People V. Northern Ky. Co. . 38 912 
 
 People V. O'Leary 16 884 
 
 People V. O'Leary 22 24 
 
 People V. Oubridge 56 442: 
 
 People V. Parvin 14 783 
 
 People V. Phillips 9 312 
 
 People V. Powellson 7 35 
 
 People V. Prather 6 315' 
 
 People V. Kay 12 161 
 
 People V. Eeed 20 708 
 
 People V. Reed 52 835 
 
 People V. Roberts 25 49& 
 
 People V. Robinstirn 21 426 
 
 People V. St. Clair 44 234 
 
 People V. Sands 35 330' 
 
 People V. San Pablo & T. R. 
 
 Co 23 310 
 
 People V. Short 41 862 
 
 People V. Silvas 5 246 
 
 People V. Southern Pac. R. 
 
 Co 19 830 
 
 People T. Southern Pac. R. 
 
 Co 23 310 
 
 People V. Southern Pac. R. 
 
 Co., two eases 38 912 
 
 People V. Strybe 36 3 
 
 People V. Sullivan 8 520 
 
 People V. Swearinger 38 972 
 
 People V. Taylor 51 638 
 
 People T. Thompson 46 907 
 
 People V. Toal 23 203 
 
 People V. Turnbull 29 225 
 
 People V. Van Sciever 42 451 
 
 People ' V. Vincent 33 900 
 
 People V. Vital 34 617 
 
 People V. Vital 37 215 
 
 People V. Waite 36 518 
 
 People V. Washington 5 228 
 
 People V. Wing ^24 1026 
 
 People V. Wohlfrom 26 236 
 
 People V. Wong Chow 4 763 
 
 People V. Worth 33 913 
 
 People V. Ylario 50 1100 
 
 People ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. 
 
 San Francisco Public 
 
 Stock Exchange 33 785 
 
 People ex rel. Buckner v. 
 
 Veuve 3 862 
 
 People ex rel. Chandler v. 
 
 Smith 29 247 
 
 People ex rel. Dougherty v. 
 
 Board of Election Com'rs, 
 
 etc 3 412 
 
 People ex rel. Leverson v. 
 
 Thompson 7 142 
 
 People ex rel. O'Donnell v. 
 
 Bartlet 5 674 
 
 People ex rel. Sanders v. 
 
 Jones 37 650 
 
 People ex rel. Sedgwick v. 
 
 Shear 15 92 
 
 People ex rel. Van Valer v. 
 
 Jacob 12 222 
 
 People ex rel. Wirt v. Budd 47 594 
 People's Ditch Co. v. King's 
 
 Riyer & Fresno Canal Co. 2 45 
 
TABLE OF CASES. 
 
 17 
 
 Vol. Page 
 People's Ditch Co. v. '76 
 
 Land & Water Co 44 176 
 
 Peres T. Crocker 47 928 
 
 Perkins v. Cooper 24 377 
 
 Perkins v. Superior Court of 
 
 Fresno County 37 780 
 
 Perkins v. West Coast Lum- 
 ber Co 33 1118 
 
 Perkins v. West Coast Lum- 
 ber Co 48 982 
 
 Perry V. Brainard 8 882 
 
 Perry v. Malarin 40 489 
 
 Petersen v. Shain 33 1086 
 
 Petersen v. Taylor 33 486 
 
 Petersen v. Taylor 34 724 
 
 Peterson V. Doe 8 834 
 
 Peterson v. Hubbard 9 106 
 
 Peterson v. Machado 43 611 
 
 Phelps V. Brown 27 420 
 
 Phillips v. Sutherland 2 32 
 
 Phillips v. Winter 37 154 
 
 Pico V. Williams. 11 600 
 
 Pieper v. Peers 31 562 
 
 Pilster T. Highton 31 580 
 
 Placer Co. v. Campbell 11 602 
 
 Ponet. V. Wills 48 483 
 
 Porteous V. Reed 12 117 
 
 Porter v. Fisher 34 700 
 
 Porter v. Lassen County 
 
 Land & Cattle Co 55 395 
 
 Porter v. Murray 12 425 
 
 Potter V. Dear 27 676 
 
 Potter V. Koeth 7 762 
 
 Pottkamp V. Buss 31 1121 
 
 Pottkamp V. Buss 46 169 
 
 Pottkamp v. Buss 46 673 
 
 Powell v. Sutro 21 436 
 
 Preston v. Mertens 27 22 
 
 Price y. Spencer 53 1073 
 
 Priet V. De La Montanya.. 22 171 
 
 Prior V. Diggs 31 155 
 
 Protestant Episcopal Old 
 
 Ladies' Home v. Mertens 27 22 
 
 Purdy V. Kahl 21 971 
 
 Purser V. Cady 49 180 
 
 Q 
 
 Quiggle V. Prouty 45 676 
 
 Quill V. Jacoby 37 524 
 
 Qnimby V. Butler 5 613 
 
 Quint V. Hoffman 37 777 
 
 Rafferty v. High 41 489 
 
 Ramsbottom v. Fitzgerald. . 52 149 
 
 Ramsbottom v. Fitzgerald . . 55 984 
 
 Randall V. Duff 40 386 
 
 Randall v. Randall 48 1114 
 
 Randol v. Rowe 44 1068 
 
 Rankin v. Amazon Ins. Co. . 25 260 
 
 Rankin v. Newman 41 304 
 
 Raskin V. Robarts 35 763 
 
 Rathgeb v. Dasso 3 131 
 
 Rauer V. Welsh 24 904 
 
 Raymond V. Glover 37 772 
 
 Raymond v. Glover 37 918 
 
 CAL.CAS.— 2 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Razzo V. Varni. 21 762 
 
 Reade V. Reade 22 284 
 
 Read's Estate, In re 29 245 
 
 Reay V. Butler 7 669 
 
 Reay V. Butler 25 350 
 
 Reay V. Butler 25 685 
 
 Reclamation Dist. No. 108 v. 
 
 Hagar 4 949 
 
 Reclamation Dist. No. 108 
 
 V. Martin 4 950 
 
 Reclamation Dist. No. 307 
 
 V. Glide 41 278 
 
 Redfield v. Oakland Consoli- 
 dated St. R. Co 42 822 
 
 Reed V. Cross 48 1114 
 
 Regensberger v. Quinn 39 788 
 
 Regents v. Dunn 6 377 
 
 Reiter v. Rothschild 33 849 
 
 Remnant v. Hoffman 11 319 
 
 Remy v. Olds 34 216 
 
 Remy v. Olds 42 239 
 
 Renton v. Cannon 9 423 
 
 Rey burn V. Booker 32 594 
 
 Reynolds v. Reynolds 8 184 
 
 Reynolds v. Robertson 4 1192 
 
 Reynolds v. Scott 4 346 
 
 Reynolds v. Superior Court 6 421 
 
 Reynolds v. Weston 4 374 
 
 Rhoads V. Gray 48 971 
 
 Rhoads V. Gray 48 1114 
 
 Richard v. Hupp 37 920 
 
 Richards v. Donner 11 770 
 
 Richards v. Dower 22 307 
 
 Richardson v. Dunne 31 737 
 
 Ricks V. Lindsay 31 262 
 
 Ridgway v. Bogan 12 343 
 
 Riehl V. City of San Jose.. 35 1014 
 Riggs V. Eagle Lake Land & 
 
 Irrigation Co 43 15 
 
 Riggs V. Poston 17 5.S0 
 
 Rinaldo, Ex parte 25 260 
 
 Rising V. Gibbs 30 589 
 
 Ritchey V. McMichael 35 151 
 
 Roberts, Estate of 7 758 
 
 Roberts v. Ball 38 949' 
 
 Roberts v. Burr 54 849 
 
 Roberts v. Levy 31 570 
 
 Robinson, Ex parte 13 8.52 
 
 Robinson v. Boardman 7 264 
 
 Robinson v. Dugan 35 902 
 
 Robinson v. Southern Pac. 
 
 Co 38 109 
 
 Robinson v. Thornton 81 936 
 
 Roeding V. Porter 2 888 
 
 Rogers V. Jones 28 488. 
 
 Rogers v. Kimball 49 719 
 
 Rogers v. Rogers 31 157 
 
 Roman Catholic Archbishop 
 of San Francisco v. Ship- 
 man 21 832 
 
 Romine V. Cralle 27 20 
 
 Rosborough v. Boardman . . 6 449 
 
 Rose, Estate of 5 163 
 
 Rose V. Foord 28 229 
 
 Rosenthal v. Perkins 53 444 
 
 Rose's Estate, In re 20 712 
 
 Rose's Estate, In re 22 169 
 
 Ross V. Brusie 10 121 
 
 Ross V. Kennedy 26 599 
 
 Ross V. Williams 15 47 
 
 Rough V. Booth 3 91 
 
18 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 „ Vol. Page 
 
 Rough V. Booth 3 805 
 
 Rough T. Simmons 3 91 
 
 Rousset V. Reay 31 900 
 
 Rousset V. Reay 32 171 
 
 Royal V. Dennison. 38 39 
 
 lioylance v. San Luis Hotel 
 
 Co 15 777 
 
 RoyoQ V. Guillee 3 672 
 
 Rubens v. Mead 53 432 
 
 Ruggles V. Cannedy 53 911 
 
 Runk V. San Diego Flume 
 
 Co 43 518 
 
 Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. 
 
 Roggenkamp 35 643 
 
 Ryan t. Super. Ct. of City 
 and County of San Fran- 
 cisco 18 598 
 
 Ryland v. Heney 52 1132 
 
 Sainsevain v. Luce 35 1033 
 
 Salinas City Bank v. Graves 21 734 
 
 Salisbury v. Brown 4 544 
 
 Salisbury v. Burr 44 461 
 
 Samuels v. Younger 4 1194 
 
 San Bernardino Co. v. Da- 
 vidson 44 660 
 
 San Bernardino Nat. Bank 
 V. Anderson 32 168 
 
 Sanborn V. Cunningham.... 33 894 
 
 Sanderson's Estate, In re. . 13 497 
 
 San Diego County v. Cali- 
 fornia S. R. Co 1 897 
 
 San Diego County v. River- 
 side County 55 7 
 
 San Diego Flume Co. v. 
 Chase 32 245 
 
 San Diego Sav. Bank v. 
 Lowenssteiu 36 387 
 
 San Diego Water Co. v. 
 City of San Diego 53 1129 
 
 San Francisco Sav. Union 
 V. Lee 54 1130 
 
 San Francisco Sav. Union v. 
 Long 53 907 
 
 San Francisco Sav. Union v. 
 Long 56 882 
 
 San Francisco Sav. Union v. 
 Ray 53 1129 
 
 San Francisco & Fresno 
 Land Co. v. Banbury 37 '801 
 
 San Gabriel Valley Land & 
 Water Co. v. Dennis 34 441 
 
 San Joaquin Land & Water 
 Co. V. Balding 35 353 
 
 San Joaquin Land & Water 
 Co. V. Hewlett 35 353 
 
 San Joaquin Land & Water 
 Co. V. Hitchcock 35 353 
 
 San Jose Imp. Co. v. De 
 Saisset 39 860 
 
 San Jose Imp. Co. v. Palo- 
 mares 39 860 
 
 San Jose Safe-Deposit Bank 
 of Savings v. Bank of Ma- 
 dera 54 270 
 
 Sankey v. Society of Califor- 
 nia Pioneers 9 424 
 
 Vol. Page 
 Santa Ana Valley Irrigation 
 
 Co. V. Anaheim Water Co. 2 249 
 Santa Clara Valley Mill & 
 
 Lumber Co. v. Williams. . 31 1128 
 Santa Cruz Butchers' Union 
 
 V. I X L Lime Co 46 382 
 
 Santa Cruz Gap Turnpike 
 
 Joint-Stock Co. v. Board 
 
 of Sup'rs of Santa Clara 
 
 Co 10 404 
 
 Santa Cruz Rock Pav. Co. 
 
 V. Lyons 43 599 
 
 Santa Monica Lumber & 
 
 Mill Co. V. Hege 48 69 
 
 Santa Paula Water Works 
 
 V. Peralta 42 239 
 
 Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. 
 
 Central St. Ry. Co 38 986 
 
 Sargent v. Cunningham .... 25 677 
 
 Saulque v. Durralde 33 1090 
 
 Savings Bank of San Diego 
 
 V. Fisher 41 490 
 
 Saving & Loan Soc. v. 
 
 Burnett 37 180 
 
 Savings & Loan Soc. v. Dur- 
 
 kin 4 1171 
 
 Sawyer V. Colgan 33 911 
 
 Sawyer V. Colgan 36 834 
 
 Sawyer V. Sargent 7 120 
 
 Sayre, In re 36 813 
 
 Scanlan v. San Francisco & 
 
 S. J. V. Ry. Co 55 694 
 
 SchaefEer v. Hofmann 37 932 
 
 Schallert Ganahl Lumber 
 
 Co. V. Sheldon 32 235 
 
 Scherrer, Kx parte 37 1046 
 
 Schmidt v. Crystal Soda 
 
 Water Co 35 855 
 
 Schmidt V. Haake 35 855 
 
 Schmidt v. Liberty Soda- 
 Works Co 35 856 
 
 Schmidt V. McEwen 35 854 
 
 Schmidt v. Steinke 35 855 
 
 Schmidt v. Welsh 35 626 
 
 Schuller v. Farquarson. .. . 6 86 
 
 Schultz V. McLean 18 776 
 
 Schultz V. McLean 25 427 
 
 Schultz V. McLean 25 430 
 
 Schultz V. McLean 28 1060 
 
 Schwannecke v. Goodenow . . 52 588 
 
 Schwartz v. Cowell 12 253 
 
 Schwartz v. Wright 56 608 
 
 Schwegerle v. Mundell 4 1173 
 
 Scott v. Rhodes 41 878 
 
 Scott V. Sowden 16 768 
 
 Scrivani v. Dondero 44 1066 
 
 Security Savings Bank & 
 
 Trust Co. V. Board of 
 
 Sup'rs of Los Angeles 
 
 County 34 437 
 
 Sedgwick v. Sedgwick 4 570 
 
 Sesler v. Montgomery 19 686 
 
 Settlers' Ditch Co. v. Hayes 22 1152 
 76 Land & Water Co. v. 
 
 Superior Court of Fresno 
 
 County 28 814 
 
 Shaeffer v. Matzen 3 95 
 
 Shaffer v. Merced County. . 55 1099 
 
 Shain v. Du Jardin 38 529 
 
 Sharon v. Sharon 7 639 
 
 Sharp T. Frank 41 §60 
 
TABLE OF CASES. 
 
 19 
 
 Vol. Page 
 Shaw V. San Diego Water 
 
 Co 50 693 
 
 Shaw V. San Diego Water 
 
 Co 50 1074 
 
 Shea V. Lent 22 876 
 
 Sheehy v. Chalmers 36 514 
 
 Sheehy V. Kerns 51 1100 
 
 Shepherd v. Keagle 53 702 
 
 Shipe V. 76 Land & Water 
 
 Co 25 694 
 
 Shipman v. Superior Court 12 787 
 
 Shuffleton v. Hill. 7 7 
 
 Shunway v. Leakey 11 839 
 
 Sichler V. Look 29 223 
 
 Silberhorn Co. v. Wheaton. . 51 689 
 
 Silva V. Silva 38 105 
 
 Silva V. Spangler 43 617 
 
 Silvar's Estate, In re 46 296 
 
 Simpson V. Simpson 41 804 
 
 Sirkus V. Central K. Co 30 790 
 
 Sisson, Crocker & Co. v. 
 
 Johnson 34 617 
 
 Skym V. Weske Consolidated 
 
 Co 47 116 
 
 Slosson V. Glosser 46 276 
 
 Smith, Ex parte 29 785 
 
 Smith, Ex parte 33 338 
 
 Smith v. American Fire Ins. 
 
 Co 23 385 
 
 Smith V. American Fire Ins. 
 
 Co 27 742 
 
 Smith V. City of San Luis 
 
 Obispo 34 830 
 
 Smith V. Dunn 6 848 
 
 Smith V. Ellis 35 764 
 
 Smith V. Pratt 37 1033 
 
 Smith V. Idaho Quartz Min. 
 
 Co 11 878 
 
 Smith v. Irving 22 170 
 
 Smith V. Keagle 20 152 
 
 Smith V. Los Angeles & P. 
 
 K. Co 34 242 
 
 Smith V. Olmstead 22 1143 
 
 Smith T. Pacific Bank, three 
 
 eases 36 410 
 
 Smith v. Pennsylvania Fire 
 
 Ins. Co 23 385 
 
 Smith V. Pennsylvania Fire 
 
 Ins. Co 27 742 
 
 Smith V. Phenix Ins. Co 23 383 
 
 Smith V. Roberts 9 104 
 
 Smith V. Sabin 43 588 
 
 Smith V. San Francisco 7 37 
 
 Smith V. Smith 38 43 
 
 Smith V. Strother 7 801 
 
 Smith V. Thomas 52 1079 
 
 Smith V. Williams 55 600 
 
 Smith's Estate, In re 38 950 
 
 Smyth V. Stockton & Cop- 
 
 perapolis K. Co 4 505 
 
 Sneath v. Waterman 28 1061 
 
 Snow V. Supervisors of Stan- 
 islaus County 6 90 
 
 Sorensen v. Dorris 37 870 
 
 Southern California Motor 
 
 Road Co. v. Merrill 34 712 
 
 Southern Cal. By. Co. v. 
 
 Southern Pac. K. Co 43 1123 
 
 Southern Cal. Ry. Co. v. 
 
 Southern Pac. R. Co 43 1124 
 
 Southern Pac. Co. v. Meyer 24 1033 
 
 Vol. 
 Southern Pac. Co. v. Prosser 52 
 Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Allen 40 
 Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Ben- 
 nett 1 
 
 Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Mc- 
 
 Cusker 7 
 
 Southmayd v. Berry 3 
 
 Spaulding v, Mammoth 
 
 Spring Min. Co '. . 49 
 
 Spaulding v. Wesson 45 
 
 Spect V. Hagar 4 
 
 Spence v. Smith 53 
 
 Spence v. Widney 46 
 
 Spencer v. Duncan 40 
 
 Spencer v. Houghton 6 
 
 Spencfer v. Spencer 52 
 
 Spooner v. Cady 36 
 
 Spooner v. Cady 44 
 
 Sprigg v. Barber 54 
 
 Sprigg V. Barber 54 
 
 Stanford's Estate, In re.... 54 
 
 Stanley V. McEIrath 26 
 
 Stanton v. Singleton 54 
 
 Staples V. May 23 
 
 State V. Folsom Water Co. . 12 
 
 Statham v. Dusy 11 
 
 Steen V. Hendy 38 
 
 Steinhart v. Coleman 41 
 
 Stephens v. Hambleton 47 
 
 Sternes, Ex parte 21 
 
 Sternes, Ex parte 21 
 
 Sternes, Ex parte 23 
 
 Stevens v. Lovejoy 27 
 
 Stevens v. St. Elmo Invest- 
 ment Co 30 
 
 Stevrart v. Dunlap 36 
 
 Stewart v. Powers 33 
 
 Stimson Mill Co. v. Riley. . . 42 
 
 Stites V. Gater 45 
 
 Stockton Combined Harves- 
 ter & Agricultural Works 
 V. American Fire Ins. 
 
 Co. of Philadelphia 33 
 
 Stockton Combined Harves- 
 ter & Agricultural Works V. 
 Hamburg-Madgeburg Fire 
 
 Ins. Co 33 
 
 Stockton Combined Harves- 
 ter & Agricultural Works V. 
 Hamburg-Magdeburg Fire 
 
 Ins. Co 53 
 
 Stockton Combined Harves- 
 ter & Agricultural Works 
 
 v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. . 33 
 Stockton Combined Harves- 
 ter & Agricultural Works 
 
 v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.. 53 
 Stockton Ice Co. v. Argonaut 
 
 Land & Development Co. . 56 
 Stockton Savings & Loan 
 
 Soc. V. Purvis 42 
 
 Stockton ochool Dist. v. 
 
 Goodell 56 
 
 Stoddard v. Superior Court 
 
 of Stanislaus County 40 
 
 Stone V. Hammeli 22 
 
 Stoner v. Freeman 24 
 
 Stout V. Hastiuers 4 
 
 kjtover V. Baker -21 
 
 Strand, In re 21 
 
 Stratton v. Burr 54 
 
 Page 
 836 
 752 
 
 702 
 
 123 
 893 
 
 183 
 807 
 421 
 933 
 463 
 549 
 853 
 
 1132 
 104 
 
 1018 
 899 
 
 1130 
 259 
 800 
 587 
 710 
 388 
 606 
 718 
 
 1098 
 51 
 
 1132 
 
 1136 
 40 
 33 
 
 580 
 
 2 
 
 489 
 
 1072 
 
 185 
 
 638 
 
 638 
 
 1129 
 
 637 
 
 1129 
 885 
 441 
 
 885 
 
 491 
 203 
 927 
 1178 
 428 
 654 
 735 
 
20 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Straus V. Williamson 18 432 
 
 Strong, Ex parte 31 574 
 
 Stufflebeem V. Hickman 53 438 
 
 Sukefoi-th V. Lord 23 296 
 
 Sullivan v. Hume 33 1121 
 
 Susskiud V. Hall 44 328 
 
 Sutlitf V. Glunie 37 224 
 
 Sutton V. Nicolaisen 44 805 
 
 Swain v. Gavin, two cases . . 46 1114 
 Swamp-Land Dist. No. 150 
 
 V. Bump 32 867 
 
 Swamp-Land Dist. No. 150 
 
 V. Cornish 32 867 
 
 Swamp-Land Dist. No. 150 
 
 V. Winter 32 _ 867 
 
 Swamp-Land Reclamation 
 
 Dist. No. 4U7 V. Ruble 14 846 
 
 Swamp-Land Reclamation 
 
 Dist. No. 407 V. Ruble 17 246 
 
 Swamp-Land Reclamation 
 
 Dist. No. 407 V. Wilcox.. 14 843 
 
 Sweeney V. Stanford. ._ 6 688 
 
 Sweetser v. Dobbins 3 116 
 
 Sweet's Estate, In re 29 249 
 
 Swift V. Shepard 4 200 
 
 Swim T. Bernard 4 1172 
 
 Swinerton v. Oregon Pae. R. 
 
 Co 52 1132 
 
 Swope V. Sherman 48 1114 
 
 Sykes v. Arne 47 868 
 
 Symons v. Bunnell 20 859 
 
 Symons V. Bunnell 22 550 
 
 T 
 
 Tafft V. Presidio & Perries 
 
 R. Co 22 485 
 
 Taggart v. Bosch 48 1092 
 
 Taggart v. Bosch 49 352 
 
 Talmadge v. Stretch 4 15 
 
 Tapi V. Superior Court of 
 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco 36 781 
 
 Taylor, In re 10 88 
 
 Taylor y. Ford 24 942 
 
 Taylor y. McClain 2 401 
 
 Thatcher y. Bdsall 4 202 
 
 Thomas, Ex parte 51 1100 
 
 Thomas, In re 44 327 
 
 Thomas v. Pacific Beach 
 
 Company 44 475 
 
 Thomason v. De Greayer... 31 567 
 
 Thompson v. Alford 52 1132 
 
 Thompson v. Gorner 36 434 
 
 Thompson v. McCarthy Co.. 43 971 
 
 Thompson v. Spray 4 418 
 
 Thomson-Houston Electric 
 
 Co. v. Central Electric Ry. 
 
 Co 55 777 
 
 Thornton v. Petersen 26 1091 
 
 Threlkel v. Scott 34 851 
 
 Thresher v. Gregory 42 421 
 
 Tibbets v. Bakewell 35 1007 
 
 Tibbetts v. Campbell 27 531 
 
 Tilden, In re 25 687 
 
 Tillman's Estate, In re 31 563 
 
 Tobin V. Omnibus Cable Co. 34 124 
 
 Todd V. Martin 37 872 
 
 Todhunter v. Armstrong. ... 53 446 
 
 Todhunter v. State 11 604 
 
 Vol. Pa,ge 
 
 Todhunter v. State 12 684 
 
 Todhunter y. State 14 615 
 
 Tognazzini V. iMorganti 23 138 
 
 Toomey v. Reilly 8 833 
 
 Torrens v. Townsend 6 423 
 
 Tower v. McDowell 31 843 
 
 Towle v. Clunie 23 314 
 
 Townley V. Adams 52 1132 
 
 Town of Redwood City v. 
 
 Grimmenstein 9 563 
 
 Town of Santa Monica v. 
 
 Eckert 33 880 
 
 Townsend v. Briggs 32 307 
 
 Treadwell, In re 4 1192 
 
 Tripp V. Duane 13 860 
 
 Trojan Min. Co. v. American 
 
 Cent. Ins. Co. of St. Louis 7 6 
 
 Trope V. Kerns 20 82 
 
 Trucks V. Bagley 12 416 
 
 Truett V. Onderhook 50 394 
 
 Trumnler v. Cotton 41 1036 
 
 Tuffree V. Brock 31 1134 
 
 Tuffree v. Sterns Ranches 
 
 Co 54 826 
 
 Tulare Building & Loan 
 
 Ass'n y. Coleman 44 793 
 
 Tulare Irrigation Dist v. 
 Kaweah Canal & Irriga- 
 tion Co 44 662 
 
 Tully V. Tully 9 841 
 
 Tully y. Wilhoit 35 651 
 
 Tully V. Wilhoit 38 54 
 
 Tunis V. Ijakeport Agricul- 
 tural Park Ass'n 33 447 
 
 Turner v. Coffman. , 32 947 
 
 Turner v. Dewey 30 1016 
 
 Tustin Fruit Ass'n y. Earl 
 
 Fruit Co. 53 693 
 
 Tyler y. Davis 31 1125 
 
 Tyler's Estate, In re 50 927 
 
 Tyner v. Seventy-Six Land 
 
 & Water Co 25 694 
 
 Ullrich v. Santa Rosa Nat. 
 
 Bank 37 500 
 
 Union Transp. Co.v.Bassett 46 907 
 
 Usher V. Usher 36 8 
 
 V 
 
 Valentine y. Sloss 37 328 
 
 Valentine V. Sloss 37 329 
 
 Valentine y. Sloss 37 410 
 
 Valley Lumber Co. v. Wood 33 343 
 
 Van Daalen v. City and 
 County of San Francisco . . 6 689 
 
 Van Slyke v. Broadway Ins. 
 Co 47 928 
 
 Van Tassel's Estate, In re. . 5 611 
 
 Van Vleck y. State Board of 
 Dental Examiners of Cali- 
 fornia 48 223 
 
 Ventura & O. V. Ry. Co. v. 
 Collins 46 287 
 
 Ventura & O. V. Ry. Co. v. 
 Collins 48 1115 
 
TABLE OF CASES. 
 
 21 
 
 Vol. Page 
 Verdelli v. Gray's Harbor 
 
 Commercial Co 47 778 
 
 Vermont Marble Co. v. Black 38 512 
 
 Vermont Marble Co. v. Black 38 961 
 
 Viera v. Dobyus 24 181 
 
 Vinton, Ex parte 47 1019 
 
 Visher v. S.winnerton 24 846 
 
 Vitoreno v. Corea 25 420 
 
 Von Schmidt v. Superior 
 
 Court 30 804 
 
 Von Schmidt v. Widber 32 531 
 
 Vorwerk v. Nolte 24 840 
 
 Vulcan Powder Co. v. Cali- 
 fornia Vigorit Powder Co. 31 583 
 
 w 
 
 Wade V. Wade 31 258 
 
 Wagner v. Superior Court of 
 
 Los Anseles County 34 648 
 
 Waldron v. Pacific Bank. . . 39 218 
 
 Walkerley's Estate, In re. . . 40 13 
 
 Walkerly's Estate, In re 22 889 
 
 WalKerly's Estate, In re 37 893 
 
 Walkerly's Estate, In re 41 780 
 
 Walker's Estate, In re 42 1082 
 
 Wallace v. Hopkins 18 673 
 
 Wallace v. Maples 14 310 
 
 Wallace v. Perrin 54 1130 
 
 Wallace v. Eaudol 54 842 
 
 Wallace v. Sisson 33 496 
 
 Walsh V. Hyland 54 148 
 
 Ward V. Porkner 50 713 
 
 Ward V. Yorba 54 80 
 
 Wardlaw v. California Ry. 
 
 Co 42 1075 
 
 Warner v. P. Thomas Pa- 
 risian Dyeing oc Cleaning 
 
 Works 37 153 
 
 Warner v. P. Thomas Pa- 
 risian Dyemg & Cleaning 
 
 Works 37 213 
 
 Warren v. Chandos 47 1097 
 
 Warren v. Connor 47 48 
 
 Watkins V. Wilhoit 35 646 
 
 WebD V. Kuns 54 78 
 
 Weidekirid v. Tuolumne Co. 
 
 Water Co 12 387 
 
 Weinburg v. Somps 33 341 
 
 Weiner V. Korn 4 373 
 
 Welch V. Young 41 791 
 
 Welch's Estate, In re 41 791 
 
 Wells V. Law 38 523 
 
 Wells V. Snow 41 858 
 
 Welsh v. Gould 21 364 
 
 West V. Belding 21 1136 
 
 West V. Girard 4 565 
 
 West V. Hitchcock 21 1136 
 
 West Coast Lumber Co. v. 
 
 Newkirk 22 232 
 
 Westerfield v. Riverside 
 
 County 50 929 
 
 Wetzel V. Webb 33 1105 
 
 Weyers v. Espittalier 32 525 
 
 Wheelan V. Lrickell 38 85 
 
 Wheeler V. Donnell 43 578 
 
 Wheelock v. Godfrey 35 315 
 
 Wheelock V. Godfrev 35 320 
 
 Whelan v. Brickell 33 396 
 
 Whitcomb v. McOlintock. . . 2 886 
 
 „, Vol. Page 
 
 White V. Adler 42 1070 
 
 White V. Douglass 8 801 
 
 White v. McKie 27 427 
 
 White V. White 24 276 
 
 White V. White 33 399 
 
 Whitesides v. Briggs 7 836 
 
 Whitman V. Hay 9 99 
 
 Whitmore v. Ainsworth .... 38 100 
 
 Whitmore v. Henderson .... 7 046 
 
 Whitmore V. Henderson ... . 7 707 
 Whitney v. American Ins. 
 
 Co 50 50 
 
 Whittle V. Doty 12 299 
 
 Whyler V. Van Tiger 14 840 
 
 Wideman v. Franks 3 494 
 
 Wiebold v. Rauer 33 839 
 
 Wiester v. Wiester 48 1080 
 
 Wiley V. California Hosiery 
 
 Co 32 522 
 
 Wilkes V. Tlbbets 31 609 
 
 Willamette Steam Mill & 
 
 Lumber Co. v. Kremer 24 1026 
 
 Willard v. Tatum 31 912 
 
 Willeford v. Bell 49 6 
 
 Willey's Estate, In re 56« 550 
 
 William Hill Co. v. Lawler.. 45 847 
 Williams v. Benicia Water 
 
 Co 4 382 
 
 Williams v. Bisagno 34 640 
 
 Williams v. Cuneo 39 207 
 
 Williams v. Cuneo 41 417 
 
 Williams v. Miller 6 14 
 
 Williams v. Southern Pac. 
 
 R. Co 9 152 
 
 Williams v. Southern Puc. 
 
 R. Co 11 849 
 
 Williams v. Superior Court 
 
 of Lassen County 47 783 
 
 Williams' Estate, In re 32 241 
 
 Williams' Estate, In re 36 6 
 
 Williams' Estate, In re 36 805 
 
 Wilson V. Baker 3 109 
 
 Wilson V. Bryan 7 838 
 
 Wilson V. California Bank. . 54 119 
 
 Wilson V. Freeman 24 927 
 
 Wilson V. Hunt 16 305 
 
 Wilson V. Samuels 35 559 
 
 Windhaus v. Bootz 25 404 
 
 Winn V. Shaw 25 244 
 
 Winthrop, Ex parte 40 751 
 
 Wise V. Hogan 18 784 
 
 Wise V. Williams 42 5'i.i 
 
 Witter y. McCarthy Co 43 969 
 
 Witter V. San Luis Obispo 
 
 Building & Loan Ass'n. . . 54 1130 
 
 Wixon V. Devine 20 367 
 
 Wolff V. Wolff 37 858 
 
 Wolters V. Thomas 32 565 
 
 Wong Lang v. Alaska Imp. 
 
 Co 38 104 
 
 Woodbridge v. World Pub. 
 
 Co 40 231 
 
 Woodbury v. Nevada South- 
 ern Ry. Co 53 1129 
 
 Woods, Ex parte 41 790 
 
 Woodside V. Tynan 50 424 
 
 Woodward V. Rauin 31 930 
 
 Woodward v. Superior Court 
 
 of City and County of San 
 
 Francisco 30 537 
 
 Woolridge v. Boardman.... 46 1114 
 
22 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 Vol. Page 
 
 Worden v. Bear Val. Irr. Co. 55 1099 
 
 Wright, Ex parte 51 1100 
 
 Wright T. Pacific Coast Oil 
 
 Co 53 1086 
 
 Wright V. Sacramento Coun- 
 ty 54 1130 
 
 Wright V. Wright 25 411 
 
 Wright V. Wright 41 695 
 
 Yaeger t. Southern Cali- 
 fornia Ry. Co 51 190 
 
 Vol. 
 
 Ybarra v. Sylvany 31 
 
 Teazel! v. Superior Court of 
 City and County of San 
 
 Francisco 4 
 
 Young V. Donegan 29 
 
 Young T. Poole 13 
 
 Young V. Trierweiler 35 
 
 Younglove v. Cunningham.. 43 
 
 Page 
 1114 
 
 503 
 412 
 492 
 773 
 
 755 
 
 Zeile's Estate, In re 15 462 
 
INDEX. 
 
 [The References are to the Pacific Reporter.] 
 
 A 
 
 ABATEMENT. 
 
 Pending action. Continuance.— Simpson v. Simpson, 41 P. 804. 
 
 ABDUCTION. 
 
 Evidence.— People v. Powellson, 7 P. 35. 
 
 ACCORD AND SATISFACTION. 
 
 Sufficiency of plea. Evidence.— Hogan v. Burns, 33 P. 631. 
 
 ACCOUNT, ACTION ON. 
 
 Open accounts in general.— Gwinn v. Hamilton, 7 P. 837. 
 
 ACCOUNT STATED. 
 
 Conclusiveness.— Olarkson v. Hoyt, 36 P. 382, 
 
 ACTIONS. 
 
 Evidence.— Paden v. Goldbaum, 37 P. 759. 
 Negligence. Verdict.— Dixon v. Plums, 31 P. 931. 
 Pleading and proof.— Clarkson v. Hoyt, 36 P. 382, 
 
 ACTION TO QUIET TITLE. 
 
 Title founded on fraudulent judgment. Allegations.— Chielovich v. Krauss, 
 9 P. 945. 
 
 ADVERSE POSSESSION. 
 
 Color of title.— Packard v. Johnson, 4 P. 632. 
 
 Limitations and laches. Parol evidence.— Cook v. McKinney, 11 P. 799. 
 Res judicata. Actual possession.— Millett v. Lagomarslno, 38 P. 308. 
 Title. Evidence.— Bath v. Veldez, 7 P. 487. 
 
 AGENCY. 
 
 Pleading. Estoppel.— Goetz v. Goldbaum, 37 P. 646. 
 Revocation.— Blumenthal v. Goodall, 25 P. 131, 
 
 ANIMALS. ■ 
 
 Trespassing. Liability of owners.— Dooley v. Seventeen Thousand and 
 Five Hundred Head of Sheep, 35 P. 1011. 
 
 APPEAL AND ERROR. 
 
 Amendment of decree.- In re Thompson's Estate, 36 P. 98. 
 Appeal vsrithout merit. Damages.— Meyers v. Trujillo, 30 P. 579. 
 Assignments of error.- Bamhart v. Edwards, 47 P. 251; Bell v. Sausalito 
 Land & Ferry Co., 33 P. 449; Dalmazzo v. Drysdale, 21 P. 553; 
 First Nat. Bank v. Kelso, 40 P. 427; People v. Acevedo, 33 P. 1099. 
 Instructions.— Crowley v. Strouse, 33 P. 456. 
 Bill of exceptions.— Norris v. Norris, 28 P. 593. 
 
 Certificate of judge.:;:;yeiifier v. Korn, 4 P. 373. 
 
 Contents.— Cox v. MfiEaBs^ltt, 18 P. Ill; Lamet v. Miller, 11 P. 744. 
 Motion for new trial.— VS'iBiaijls v. Benicia Water Co., 4 P. 382. 
 Necessity.— In re Ling; 7 V. 660. 
 Bond.— Cramer v. Little, 11 P. 852; Macomber v. Conradt, 37 P. 382; 
 Palmer v. Galvin, 6 P. 99. 
 OAL.CAS. (^3) 
 
24 CALIFOENIA CASES. 
 
 APPEAL AND ERROR— Cont'd. 
 
 Granting time to file new undertaking.— Nobmann v. Superior Court 
 of San Francisco, 12 P. 869. 
 
 Justification of sureties.— Gooby v. Hanson, 11 P. 489; Mansfield v. 
 Stern, 4 P. 777. 
 
 Stay of execution.— Cummings v. Cummings, 13 P. 322. 
 
 Sufficiency.— Field v. Andrada, 37 P. 180; Rhoads v. Gray, 48 P. 971. 
 
 Wlien reauired.— Von Schmidt v. Widber, 32 P. 531; Id. 532. 
 Conflicting evidence.— Andrews v. Wilbur, 41 P. 790; Carlson v. Mutual 
 ReUef Ass'n, 6 P. 395; Connolly v. Wlcljs, 51 P. 37; Cummings v. 
 Marsh, 6 P. 1; Farns worth v. Wixom, 5 P. 506; Haley v. Shep- 
 herd, 7 P. 635; Herzog v. Julien, 4 P. .501; Jaclc v. Saunders, Id. 
 487; Kelly v. Brown, 8 P. 38; Moore v. Moore, 7 P. 688; Oaliland 
 Banls of Savings v. Appelgarth, 4 P. 1189; Ormsby v. De Borra, 52 
 P. 499; Peterson v. Doe, 8 P. 834; Salisbury v. Brown, 4 P. 544. 
 
 Findings.— McKenzie v. Joost, 45 P. 1056; Sullivan v. Hume, 33 P. 
 1121. 
 
 Harmless error. — Ferguson v. McBean, 35 P. 559. 
 
 Review.— Cross v. Reed, 29 P. 244. 
 
 Sufficiency of findings.— Afflerbach v. McGovern, 36 P. 839; Burton 
 V. Nichols, 1 P. 896; Cohen v. Mitchell, 9 P. 649; .Tackson v. Lo- 
 gan, 5 P. 670; Rathgeb v. Dasso, 3 P. 131; Tyler v. Davis, 31 P. 
 1125. 
 Construction of evidence. S^ufficiency of findings.— Chalmers v. Chalmers, 
 
 3 P. 104. 
 Continuance. Dismissaf, of complaint— Fleming v. Hawley, 4 P. 576. 
 Costs.— Caffrey v. Omilak Gold & Silver Min. Co., 36 P. 652; Emeric v. 
 Alvarado, 3 P. 105; Schaeffer v. Hofmann, 37 P. 932. 
 
 Reversal.— Dixon v. Plums, 35 P. 1047. 
 Damages on dismissal.— Kirby v. Harrington, 13 P. 218. 
 Decisions reviewable. — Hines v. Roadhouse, 7 P. 837; Sprigg v. Barber, 54 
 P. 899; Vermont Marble Co. v. Black, 38 P. 961. 
 
 Dismissal.— Dehail v. City of Los Angeles, 51 P. 27; Leet v. Board 
 of Sup'rs of Kern County, 47 P. 595. 
 
 Haimless error.— Tuff ree v. Stems Ranchos Co., 54 P. 826. 
 
 Nature and scope of decision.— People v. Majors, 2 P. 744. 
 
 Order granting new trial.- Hammel v. Stone, 14 P. 675; Hogan v. 
 Sanders, Id. 677. 
 
 Vacating judgment.— Carter v. Paige, 20 P. 729. 
 
 Writ of review. When lies.— Ryan v. Superior Court of City and 
 County of San Francisco, 18 P. 598. 
 Determination and disposition of cause. Affirmance.- Hanson v. VoU, 21 
 P. 971; Modoc County v. Madden, 53 P. 268; Purdy v. Rahl, 21 P. 
 971; Scott V. Sowden, 16 P. 768. 
 
 Amendment of judgment.— Ashton v. Heydenfeldt, 56 P. 1031. 
 
 Entry of judgment— Ede v. Cuneo, 55 P. 772. 
 
 Modification.— Quint v. Hoffman, 37 P. 777; Raymond v. GWver, Id. 
 918. 
 
 Reversal.— Garbe v. Wilks, 38 P. 499; Klauber v. San Diego Street- 
 Car Co., 34 P. 516. 
 Dismissal.— Childs v. Kincaid, 30 P. 525; De La Cuesta v. Calkins, 41 P. 
 1008; In re De Leon's Estate, 35 P. 309; Ellis v. Judson, 10 P. 127; 
 Guardian Fire & Life Assur. Co. v. Thompson, 9 P. 2; Gurnen v. 
 Garrity, 10 P. 118; Leonis v. Lefflngwell, 55 P. 897; Meysan v. 
 Chambrie, 5 P. 670; Niosi v. Empire Steam Laundry, 46 P. 153; 
 Ohlandt v. iJoost, 53 P. 213; Parker v. Bernal, 7 P. 634; People v. 
 Jordan, 3 P. 101; Reay v. Butler, 25 P. 685; Sorensen v. Dorris, 
 37 P. 870; White v. White, 24 P. 276; Young v. Trierweiler, 35 P. 
 773. 
 
 Appeal without merit.— De Pena v. TrujlUo, 30 P. 560. 
 
 Costs.— Blackburn v. Abila, 39 P. 797. 
 
 Delay in taking.— Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 36 P. 947. 
 
 Failure to file record.- In re Read's Estate, 29 P. 245. 
 
INDEX. 
 
 25 
 
 APPEAL AND ERROR— Cont'd. 
 
 Failure to file transcript.— Bates v. McDowell, 34 P. 327; First Nat. 
 
 Banli V. Kowalslcy, 27 P. 783; Hyde v. Boyle, 24 P. 1060; Levy 
 
 V. Everett, 31 P. Ill; McAvoy v. Bothwell, 12 P. 161; Turner v. 
 
 Coffman, 32 P. 947; Vitoreno v. Corea, 25 P. 420. 
 
 Grounds.— Dore v. Dougherty, 4 P. 1067; In re Walkerly's Estate, 37 
 
 P. 893. 
 Hearing and rehearing.— Hewitt v. Dean, 26 P. 1101. 
 Laches.— Reay v. Butler, 25 P. 350. 
 Notice.— Appeal of Doughty, 40 P. 13; People v. Swearinger, 38 P. 
 
 972; In re Walkerly's Estate, 40 P. 13. 
 Proceedings frivolous or for delay.— Clough v. Borello, 48 P. 330; Bm- 
 
 hoff V. McMann, 23 P. 302. 
 Service of notice.— Brown v. Mann, 9 P. 545; Sneath v. Waterman, 28 
 
 P. 1061. 
 Statement on appeal.— Buckley v. AlthofE, 24 P. 635. 
 Striking out record.— In re Williams' Estate, 36 P. 6. 
 Sufficiency of motion.— In re Sweet's Estate, 29 P. 249. 
 Transcript— Smith v. City of San Francisco, 7 P. 37. 
 When granted.— Gregory v. Keating, 18 P. 389. 
 Dismissal by stipulation.— Oliver v. Blair, 5 P. 917. 
 Divided court. Affirmance. Pleading. Sufficiency. Presumptions.— <Smith 
 
 V. Ferries & C. H. Ry. Co., 51 P. 710. 
 Duty of trial court as to findings on issues.— Conklin v. Stone, 6 P. 378. 
 Entry of order nunc pro tunc. Time for appeal.— Noce v. Daveggio, 4 P. 
 
 495. 
 Failure of parties to appear. Hearing and rehearing. — Huggins v. Handy. 
 
 17 P. 533. 
 
 Findings. — Hamil v. Littner, 7 P. 707. 
 
 Facts in issue. — Doane v. Barber, 9 P. 89. 
 
 Harmless error. — Perkins v. West Coast Lumber Co., 48 P. 982. 
 Sufficiency of "evidence. — Ames v. Wilson, 9 P. 315; Hard wick v. Tyr- 
 rell, 1 P. 896; Hey wood v. Berkeley Land & Town Imp. Ass'n, 11 
 P. 246. 
 Frivolous appeal. Damages. — Younglove v. Cunningham, 43 P. 755. 
 Harmless error. — Carlson v. Mutual Relief Ass'n, 6 P. 395; Crawford v. 
 Harris, 45 P. 819; Damsguard v. Gunnoldson, 7 P. 772; Eppinger 
 V. Kendrick, 44 P. 234; Graham v. Franke, 38 P. 455; Hogan v. 
 Tyler, 7 P. 454; Klumpke v. Ackerson, 11 P. 31; Livingston v. 
 Oonant, 51 P. 859; O'Connor v. Flynn, 7 P. 188; Quimby v. Butler, 
 5 P. 613; Roberts v. Ball, 38 P. 949; Romine v. Oralle, 27 P. 20; 
 Willeford v. Bell, 49 P. 6. 
 Admission of evidence. — Adair v. Crane, 8 P. 512. 
 Amendment of pleadings.— Bradley v. Parker, 34 P. 234. 
 Findings. — Adams v. De Boom, 39 P. 858. 
 
 Objections waived. Injury to passenger. Evidence. — Yaeger v. South- 
 ern California Ry. Co., 51 P. 190. 
 Reception of evidence. — Adams v. Pamsworth, 37 P. 221. 
 Waiver of appeal bond. — Newman v. Maldonado, 30 P. 833. 
 Hearing and rehearing. — Bishop v. Glassen, 12 P. 258; Blythe v. Savage, 
 36 P. 844; EUedge v. National City & O. R. Co.. 34 P. 852; People 
 V. Moran, 31 P. 853; Same v. Smith, 29 P. 246; Rousset v. Reay, 32 
 P. 171. 
 Modification. — In re Haas' Estate, 32 P. 327. 
 Motion to advance. — Gregory v. Keating, 18 P. 389. 
 New questions. — People v. Bruggy, 26 P. 965. 
 Index to transcript. Dismissal. — Donahue v. Mariposa Land & M. Co., 4 
 
 P. 881. 
 Instructions. Exceptions to part of charge. — People v. Prather, 6 P. 315. 
 Instructions on material issues. — Monroe v. Cooper, 6 P. 378. 
 Insufficient record. Dismissal. — Huse v. Den, 30 P. 1104. 
 Issue of execution pending appeal. When allowed. — Gregory v. Keating, 
 
 18 P. 389. 
 
26 CALIFOENIA CASES. 
 
 APPEAL AND ERROR— Cont'd. „ , r. " 
 
 Judgment. Modification. Damages. — Kerry v. Pacific Marine Supply Co., 
 
 54 P. 262. 
 Liability on bond. Demand. — Pleper v. Peers, 31 P. 562. 
 Mandate and proceedings in lower court — Etchepare v. Aguirre, 27 P. 929. 
 Modification.^Town of Redwood City v. Grimmenstein, 9 P. 563. 
 Motion for new trial. — Gutierrez v. BrinkerhofC, 1 P. 482; People V. Elster,. 
 3 P. 884; In re Williams' Estate, 36 P. 805; Williams v. Soutbem 
 Pac. R. Co., 9 P. 152. 
 Assignment of errors. — Lower Kings River Reclamation Dist. No. 531 
 
 V. Phillips, 39 P. 634. 
 Discretion of court. — Lewis v. Adams, 7 P. 779. 
 Necessity and duty of filing transcript. — Newman v. Bank of California, 
 
 15 P. 43. 
 New trial. Sufficiency of findings.— Nelson v. Floyd, 4 P. 105; Fraser v. 
 
 Nelson, 4 P. 105. 
 Notice. — Lancaster v. Maxwell, 37 P. 207; Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. 
 Fisher, 39 P. 761. 
 Service. — De Arnaz v. Jaynes, 34 P. 223; Ellis v. Bennet, 3 P. 801. 
 Signature by attorney. — Harrigan v. Bolte, 8 P. 184. 
 Objections not raised below. — Campbell v. West, 29 P. 645. 
 
 Verdict. — Diggs v. Porteus, 33 P. 447. 
 Order granting new trial. Presumptions. — Craig v. Allen, 9 P. 429. 
 Parties.- — Dunphy v. Potrero Co., 4 P. 1171. 
 
 Party aggrieved. Authority of attorney. — In re Meade's Estate, 49 P. 5.^ 
 Payment of costs. — Estate of Crozier, 4 P. 240. 
 
 Prejudicial error. Necessity of exceptions. — Taggart v. Bosch, 48 P. 1092. 
 Presumptions. Amendment of judgment. — ^First Nat. Bank v. Kowalsky, 
 
 31 P. 1128. . 
 Proceedings frivolous or for delay. — ^Boehm v. Gibson, 35 P. 1014; Dunphy 
 
 V. Heinmann, 16 P. 5. 
 Questions of fact. Newly-discovered evidence. — Cllristensen v. McBride, 
 36 P. 398. 
 Verdict and findings. — Casey v. Jordan, 9 P. 99; Sweetser v. Dobbins, 
 3 P. 116. 
 Record. — In re Smith's Estate, 38 P. 950. 
 
 Certificate of undertaking. — ^Jones v. Iverson, 31 P. 625. 
 Sufficiency of findings. — Fitzpatrick v. Bryan, 7 P. 838; Hulsey v. 
 Same, Id.; Wilson v. Bryan, Id. 
 Record and proceedings. Briefs. — People v. Lee Hung. 3 P. 109. 
 Record and proceedings not in record. — Clarke v. Baird, 34 P. 777; Dams- 
 guard V. Gunnoldson, 7 P. 772; Haynes v. Backman, 31 P. 746; 
 Meysan v. Chabrie, 7 P. 634; Olney v. Weske, 5 P. 611; Rough v. 
 Booth, 3 P. 91; Sirkens v. Central R. Co., 30 P. 790. 
 Bill of exceptions. — Curran v. Kennedy, 24 P. 276; Helsel v. Seeger, 
 
 34 P. 237. 
 Briefs. — ^Whitman v. Hay, 9 P. 99. 
 Clerical error.— Doolan v. Cunningham, 4 P. 1193. 
 Delay in filing. — Burr v. Navarro Mill Co., 35 P. 990. 
 Dismissal for want of transcript. — Turner v. Dewey, 30 P. 1016. 
 Evidence. — Hawkins v. Morehead, 34 P. 223. 
 
 Filing briefs. — Orowell v. Brown, 10 P. 337; Markham v. Fowler, 17 
 P. 228; People v. Chum Cum Took, 27 P. 614; Santa Paula Water- 
 works V. Peralta, 42 P. 239. 
 Judgment roll. — Broker v. Taylor, 43 P. 387. 
 Matters not apparent on record. — ^Richardson v. Dunne, 31 P. 737 
 Motion to dismiss.^People v. Jacob, 12 P. 222. 
 Presumptions. — Ullrich v. Santa Rosa Nat. Bank, 37 P. 500. 
 Striking brief from files. — Duncan v. Times-Mirror Co., 52 P. 651. 
 Reformation of contract. Action for breach of contract. — Thomason v. 
 
 De Greayer, 31 P. 567. 
 Rehearing.— Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver-Min. Co., 53 P. 169. 
 Remand. Obiter dicta. — Luco v. De Toro, 34 P. 516. 
 
INDEX. 
 
 27 
 
 APPEAL AND ERROR— Cont'd. 
 
 Remittitur. — San Francisco Sav. Union v. Long, 56 P. 882. 
 
 Requisites. Service of notice. — Roylance v. San Luis Hotel Co., 15 P. 777. 
 
 Reservation of grounds for review. Objections. — McVey v. Beam, 38 P. 
 
 515. 
 Reversal. Restitution.— 'Reynolds v. Reynolds, 8 P. 184. 
 Review.— Hunter v. Hubert, 39 P. 534; Newman v. Buckman, 39 P. 209; 
 Stimson Mill Co. v. Riley, 42 P. 1072; Woodbridge v. World Pub. 
 Co., 40 P. 231; Yaeger v. Southern California Ry. Co., 51 P. 190. 
 Amendment of record. — Warner v. F. Thomas Parisian Dyeing & 
 
 Cleaning Works, 37 P. 153. 
 
 Conflicting evidence. — ^Bayley v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., 56 
 
 P. 638; Curry v. Holland, 46 P. 4; Grangers' Bank v. Shuey, 55 P. 
 
 682; Johnson v. Greenberg, 37 P. 141; Ontario Land & Improvement 
 
 Co. V. Howard, Id. 465; Patent Brick Co. v. Wissinger, 38 P. 639; 
 
 Schwartz v. Wright, 56 P. 608; In re Silvar's Estate, 46 P. 296; 
 
 -Slosson V. Glosser, Id. 276; Straus v. Williamson, 18 P. 432; White 
 
 V. McKie, 27 P. 427; Wong Lang v. Alaska Imp. Co., 38 P. 104. 
 
 Decision on prior appeal. — Smith v. City of San Luis Obispo, 34 P. 830. 
 
 Decisions of intermediate courts.— Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. 
 
 Hancock, 36 P. 100. 
 Defects not apparent of record.— Hughes v. Thompson, 16 P. 532. 
 Discretion of lower court.— Goodrich v. Loupe, 46 P. 77; Smith v. 
 
 Ferries & C. H. Ry. Co., 51 P. 710. 
 Discretion of trial court.— Hynes v. Nelson, 2 P. 36; Kellenberger v. 
 
 Market St. Cable Ry. Co., 33 P. 90. 
 Dismissal.— Fox v. Grayson, 53 P. 932; People v. Vital, 37 P. 215. 
 Findings.— Fiske v. Casey, 36 P. 668. 
 Findings by court- Alexander v. Chick, 30 P. 587. 
 Grant of new trial.— Gollin v. Lyle, 31 P. 456; Gruss v. Robertson, 37 
 
 P. 772; Scrivani v. Dondero, 44 P. 1066. 
 Harmless error.- Cannon v. McGrew, 46 P. 463; Haight v. Sexton, 42 
 P. 637; McRae v. Argonaut Land & Development Co., 54 P. 743; 
 Stienhart v. Coleman, 41 P. 1098. 
 Matters not apparent of record.- Carter v. Paige, 20 P. 729: Wilkes 
 
 v. Tibbets, 31 P. 609; Young v. Donegan, 29 P. 412. 
 Modification.— Bryson v. McGone, 53 P. 639. 
 Objections not raised below.— Gage v. Downey, 19 P. 113. 
 Order granting new trial.— De Camp v. Bryson, 39 P. 861. 
 Prejudicial error.- Kelley v. Owens, 31 P. 14. 
 Presumption.— Austin v. Gagin, 30 P. 790; Braly v. Henry, 18 P. 798; 
 
 In re Carriger's Estate, 41 P. 700; Martin v. Splivalo, 21 P. 547. 
 Questions decided on former appeal.— Carr v. Quigley, 16 P. 9. 
 Questions not raised below.— California Loan & Trust Co. v. Ham- 
 
 mell, 43 P. 955; Stewart v. Dunlap, 36 P. 2. 
 Statute of limitations.— Janes v. De Azevedo, 30 P. 1104. 
 Sufficiency of findings.- Allingham v. Kix, 28 P. 579; German v. 
 Brown, 33 P. 58; HamUn v. Phillips, 33 P. 331; Healey v. Norton. 
 41 P. 1080; Morgans v. Adel, 18 P. 247; Partridge v. Owens, 18 P. 
 856. 
 Weight and sufficiency of evidence. — Thornton v. Petersen, 26 P. 1091; 
 Ponet V. Wills, 48 P. 483; Welsh v. Gould, 21 P. 364; Weyers v. Es- 
 pittalier, 32 P. 525; Wright v. Wright, 25 P. 411; Dow v. Nason, 
 37 P. 656; Fisher v. Hopkins, 33 P. 438; Grant v. Dreyfus, 52 P. 
 1074; Harris v. Sutherland, 19 P. 701; Leverone v. Hildreth, 42 
 P 317; Loose v. Stanford, 44 P. 1058; McGee v. San Francisco & 
 X P. Ry. Co., 43 P. 1106; Newell v. Steele, 42 P. 637; New Zea- 
 land Ins. Co. V. Bradbeer, 34 P. 445; People v. Lapique, 49 P. 1117; 
 Petersen v. Taylor, 34 P. 724. 
 Service of notice.— Nissen v. Bendixen, 3 P. 404. 
 
 Stay of proceedings. Necessity of bond.— Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. 
 Fisher, 35 P. 77. 
 
28 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 APPEAL AND ERROR— Cont'd. 
 
 Sufficiency of evidence.— Carlson v. Mutual Relief Ass'n, 6 P. 395; CnafEey 
 V. Dexter, 4 P. &80; Damsguard v. Gunnoldson, 7 P. 772; In re 
 Feeley's Estate, 3 P. 876; Hogan v. Tyler, 7 P. 454; Jones v. Des- 
 mond, 6 P. 420; Kasten v. Paxton, 7 P. 490; Kellogg v. Colgan, 23 
 P. 526; Peterson v. Doe, 8 P. 834; Ramsbottom v. Fitzgerald, 52 
 P. 149; Toomey v. Reilly, 8 P. 833. 
 Findings.— Crites v. Willsinson, 3 P. 130; Haight v. Tryon, 34 P. 712; 
 People V. Burt, 3 P. 653; Truclis v. Bagley, 12 P. 416; Wideman 
 V, Franks, 3 P. 494. 
 Sufficiency of findings.— Duane v. Neumann, 2 P. 274; Himmelman v. 
 Henry, 21 P. 731; Kennedy v. Gift, 8 P. 526; Macomber v. Con- 
 radt, 37 P. 901; People v. Blake, 3 P. 102; Southmayd v. Berry, 
 Id. 893. 
 Conflicting evidence. — Huglies v. Parsons, 6 P. 380. 
 Presumption.— Kuschel v. Hunter, 50 P. 397. 
 Review.— Barclay v. Severance, 35 P. 8(^; OuUahan v. Baldwin, 45 P. 
 
 1032. 
 Waiver of objections.— Haines v. Stilwell, 40 P. 332. 
 Surety on bonds. Notice of judgment. — Mowry v. Heney, 24 P. 301. 
 Time for filing undertaking. — Chalfant v. Jones, 5 P. 626; Iverson v. Same, 
 
 Id. 
 Time of taking.— In re Rose's Estate, 20 P. 712. 
 
 Dismissal.— Esrey v. Southern Pac. Co., 35 P. 310. 
 Review.— Nelmes v. Wilson, 34 P. 341. 
 Transcript Time for filing. — Horton v. Dominguez, 8 P. 273. 
 Transfer of cause. Bonds.— McRae v. Argonaut Land & Development Co., 
 54 P. 743. 
 Defective bond.— Stockton School Dist. v. Goodell, 56 P. 885. 
 Failure to file transcript.— Hart v. Kimberly, 46 P. 618. 
 Notice.— Jones v. McGarvey, 56 P. 896; McKeany v. Black, 46 P. 381. 
 Prematurity.— More v. Miller, 54 P. 263. 
 
 Time of taking proceedings.— More v. Miller, 53 P. 1077; Same v. 
 More, Id.; Steen v. Hendy, 38 P. 718. 
 Waiver of objections. Harmless error. — People v. Evans, 41 P. 444. 
 Weight and sufficiency of evidence.— Beckman v. Bronner, 11 P. 565. 
 Weight of evidence. Sufficiency of findings. — In re Irvine's Estate, 33 P. 
 
 1128. 
 Withdrawal or abandonment.— Keating v. Edgar, 1 P. 155. 
 
 ARBITRATION AND AWARD. 
 
 Stay of judgment— In re Kreiss, 28 P. 806. 
 ARREST. 
 
 Civil process. Affidavit. — Ex parte Bernard, 12 P. 487. 
 ARSON. 
 
 Nature and elements of offenses. Trial.— People v. Daniels, 34 P. 233. 
 
 Prosecution and punishment. Evidence.— People v. Fournier, 47 P. 1014. 
 
 Trial. Instructions.— People v. Lee Hung, 1 P. 155. 
 
 ASSAULT AND BATTERY. 
 
 Actions. Excessive damages.— May v. Steele, 9 P. 112. 
 Damages for personal injuries. Actions.— Townsend v. Briggs, 32 P. 307. 
 ASSIGNMENTS. 
 
 Action by assignee. Notice of assignment.— Cunningham v. Norton, 40 P. 
 
 491. 
 Actions to set aside pleading.— Christensen v. Jessen, 40 P. 747. 
 Assignment of contract. Action against assignee.— McCarty v. Owens, 41 
 
 P. 861. 
 Assignment of security with debt— Chester v. Toklas, 6 P. 85. 
 Fraudulent representations. Limitations.— Christensen v. Jessen, 40 P. 
 
 747. 
 Guaranty. Consideration.— Cunningham v. Norton, 40 P. 491. 
 Validity. Delivery of possession.— Kirk v. Roberts, 31 P. 620. 
 
INDEX. 29 
 
 ASSIGNMENTS FOB BENEFIT OF CREDITORS. 
 
 Attorney of assignee. Purchase of claims below par.— SutllfC v. Olunle, 37 
 
 P. 224. 
 Exempt property. Finding.— Aylesworth v. Dean, 12 P. 241. 
 Payment of claims by assignee. Notice.— Sutliff v. Olumie, 37 P. 224. 
 Record. Limitation.— Watklns v. Wilholt, 35 P. 646. 
 ASSUMPSIT, ACTION OP. 
 
 Grounds. Sufficiency of evidence.— Buhman v. Becker, 42 P. 28. 
 
 Instructions. Review.— Castagnino v. Balletta, 21 P. 1097. 
 
 Money lent. Evidence.— First Nat. Bank v. California Nat. Bank, 35 P. 
 
 639. 
 Pleading.— Kirk v. Roberts, 31 P. 620. 
 
 Limitations.- Morrow v. Norton, 38 P. 953. 
 ATTACHMENT. 
 
 Action on bond. .ludgment— Moore v. Mott, 34 P. 345. 
 IMssolution. Affidavits.— Calien v. Malioney, 12 P. 300. 
 Liabilities on bonds. Actions.— Rosenthal v. Perkins, 53 P. 444. 
 
 Rights of sureties as against principal.— March v. Barnet, 51 P. 20. 
 Liability of sheriff for unlawful attachment. Attorney's fees.— Spooner v. 
 
 Cady, 44 P. 1018. ' 
 
 Mingling of goods. Illegal seizure.— Susskind v. Hall, 44 P. 328. 
 Recovery of personal property. Demand.— McNally v. Connolly, 9 P. 169. 
 Undertaking. Sufficiency.— Cahen v. Mahoney, 12 P. 300. 
 Unlawful attachment. Dissolution. — Spooner v. Cady, 44 P. 1018. 
 Wrongful attachment. Action against officer.— Eaton v. Metz, 40 P. 947. 
 Actions.— Bunting v. Slaz, 22 P. 1132. 
 Levy.— Eaton v. Metz, 40 P. 947. 
 
 ATTORNEY AND CLIENT. 
 
 Action for services. Damages for negligence.— Hinckley v. Krug, 34 P. 118. 
 Compensation and lien. Actions for compensation.— Ellis v. Woodburn, 24 
 
 P. 88S. 
 Compromise.— ChafCey v. Dexter, 4 P. 980. 
 Disbarment and suspension. — In re Treadwell, 4 P.' 1192; In re Knapp, 16 
 
 P. 520; In re Lowenthal, 3 P. 657. 
 Misconduct. Disbarment.— In re Kowalsky, 35 P. 77. 
 Grounds and proceedings.— In re Barnes. 16 P. 896. 
 Power of supreme court.— In re Tilden, 25 P. 687. 
 When granted.- In re Lowenthal, 37 P. 526. 
 
 B 
 
 BAIL. 
 
 Judgment on bail bond.— People v. Worth, 33 P. 913. 
 
 BANKS AND BANKING. 
 
 Collection. Liability to account— Marks v. Bodie Bank, 8 P. 807. 
 Functions and dealings.— Grangers! Bank of California v. Shuey, 55 P. 682. 
 General and special letters of credit. Liability of writer.— Lafargue v. 
 
 Harrison, 9 P. 259. 
 Letter of credit. Definitions.— Lafargue v. Harrison, 9 P. 259. 
 Officers and agents. Authority.— Chadbourne v. Stockton Savings & Loan 
 Soc, 36 P. 127. 
 Fraudulent assignments.— Caswell v. Harris, 13 P. 166. 
 
 BENEFICIAL. ASSOCIATIONS. 
 
 Endowment benefit. Actions against associations.— Osterman v. District 
 
 Grand Lodge No. 4, I. O. B. B., 43 P. 412. 
 Liability for sick benefits. Burden of proof.— MuUally v. Irish-American 
 
 Benev. Soc, 6 P. 78. 
 
 BILLS AND NOTES. 
 
 Actions. Complaint. Marl v. Forbes, 21 P. 552; Younglove v. Cunning- 
 ham, 43 P. 755. 
 Defense of alteration.- Davis v. Lamb, 35 P. 306. 
 
30 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 BILLS AND NOTES— Cont'd. 
 
 Defenses. Frivolous appeal.— Foote v. Hayes, 39 P. 601. 
 Evidence.— Braly v. Henry, 18 P. 798; Sheehy v. Chalmers, 36 P. 514; 
 
 Talmadge v. Stretch, 4 P. 15. 
 Findings.— O'Conor v. Clarke, 44 P. 482. 
 Forgery as a defense.— Ford v. Kenton, 40 P. 1031. 
 Pleadings.— Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Richards, 53 P. 439; Ho- 
 gan V. Burns, 33 P. 631; Naftzger v. Gregg, 31 P. 612; Same v. 
 Montague, Id. 612; Pllster v. Highton, Id. 580. 
 Review.- Megginson v. Turner, 55 P. 795. 
 Attorney's fee. Pledge.— Hildreth v. Williams, 33 P. 1113. 
 Consideration.— Talmadge v. Stretch, 4 P. 15. 
 Payment. — Wallace v. Randol, 54 P. 842. 
 Execution. Evidence.— Schwartz v. Wright, 56 P. 608. 
 Failure of consideration.- Estudillo v. Aguirre, 5 P. 109. 
 Liability of indemnitors. Joint agreement.— Rogers v. Kimball, 49 P. 719. 
 Negotiable instruments. Consideration.— Bean v. Proseus, 31 P. 49. 
 Parties. Transfer.— O'Conor v. Clarke, 44 P. 482. 
 Payment and discharge.— Dow v. Nason, 38 P. 54. 
 
 Release between makers. Consideration.— Rogers v. Kimball, 49 P. 719. 
 Eights and liabilities of indorsers. Waiver of notice of protest. — Stanley 
 
 V. MeElrath, 22 P. 673. 
 Rights and liabilities on indorsement and transfer.— First Nat. Bank v. 
 
 Hughes, 46 P. 272. 
 Rights of indorser.- March v. Barnet, 51 P. 20. 
 
 Transfer of note. Bona fide holder.— McMahon v. Thomas, 39 P. 783. 
 Waiver of demand and notice.— Savings Bank of San Diego v. Fisher, 41 
 P. 490. 
 
 BONDS. 
 
 Actions.— Sawyer v. Colgan, 36 P. 834. 
 
 Sureties.— Farley v. Moran, 31 P. 158. 
 Breach. Liabilities of sureties.— Humboldt Savings & Loan Soc. v. Wenner- 
 hold, 20 P. 5.53. . 
 
 BOUNDARIES. 
 
 Division line. Oral agreement.— Adair v. Crane, 8 P. 512. 
 Evidence. Appeal and error.— Adair v. White, 34 P. 338. 
 Possession. Mistake as to division line.— Smith v. Roberts, 9 P. 104. 
 
 BROKERS. 
 
 Authorization to sell real estate.— Schuller v. Farquarson, 6 P. 86. 
 Commissions. Contract.- Quiggle v. Prouty, 45 P. 676. 
 
 Evidence.— Wallace v. Hopkins, 18 P. 673. 
 Commissions and compensation. Statute of frauds.— Porter v. Fisher, 34 
 
 P. 700. 
 Compensation. Acting for both parties.— Berlin v. Farwell, 31 P. 456. 
 
 Insufficient evidence.— Leszynsky v. Meyer, 53 P. 703. 
 Compensation and lien. Actions for compensation. — Perkins v. Cooper, 24 
 
 P. 377. 
 Fraud.— Rubens v. Mead, 53 P. 432. 
 
 BURGLARY. 
 
 Prosecution and punishment. Appeal and error.— People v. Abbott, 34 P. 
 
 500. 
 Sufficiency of judgment.— Ex parte Woods, 41 P. 796. 
 
 CARRIERS. 
 
 Actions for breach of warranty. Limitation and laches. — Bancroft v. San 
 
 Francisco Tool Co., 47 P. 684. , 
 Actions for injury to passenger. Instructions.— Knight v. Pacific Coast 
 
 Stage Co., 34 P. 868. 
 
INDEX. 31 
 
 ■CAEEIERS— Cont'd. 
 
 Carriers of goods. Connecting lines.— Colfax Mountain Fruit Co. v. South- 
 em Pac. Co., 46 P. 668. 
 Negligence. — Pierce v. Southern Pac. Co., 47 P. 874. 
 Delay in transportation. Evidence.— Colfax Mountain Fruit Co. v. South- 
 ern Pac. Co., 46 P. 668. 
 Injury to passenger. Contributory negligence.— Wardlaw v. California Ry. 
 
 Co., 42 P. 1075. 
 Passenger elevator. Construction.— Bancroft v. San Francisco Tool Co., 47 
 P. 684. 
 
 CERTIORARI. 
 
 Application for writ.— Graves v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Co., 4 
 
 P. 200; Gross v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco, 10 
 
 P. 122. 
 Grounds in general.— Brown v. Superior Court, 3 P. 895. 
 Nature and grounds. Decisions aad proceedings of courts. — Board of 
 
 Sup'rs of City and County of San Francisco v. Superior Court, 50 P. 432. 
 Proceedings and determination.— Dorland v. Bernal, 7 P. 792. 
 Rehearing.— Alexander v. Municipal Court of Appeals, 4 P. 961. 
 Review.— Xunan v. Superior Court, 4 P. 416. 
 Review of acts of municipal court of appeals.— Alexander v. Municipal 
 
 Court of Appeals, 4 P. 961. 
 Settlement of administrator's account.— Hirschfield v. Superior Court of 
 
 Tulare County, 8 P. 273. 
 Writ. Return of service.— Tapi v. Superior Court of City and County of 
 
 San Francisco, 36 P. 781. 
 
 CBARITIES. 
 
 Construction. Review.— In re Willey's Estate, 56 P. 550. 
 
 CHATTEL MORTGAGES. 
 
 Actions for discharge. Pledge.— Irwin v. McDowell, 34 P. 708. 
 Def avdt. Election.- Sykes v. Ame, 47 P. 868. 
 Recording. Rights of creditors.— Ruggles v. Cannedy, 53 P. 911. 
 Validity. Notice.— Bank of Ukiah v. Gibson, 39 P. 1069. 
 
 COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES. 
 
 Board of regents. Sale of land.— White v. Douglass, 8 P. 801. 
 Funds in state treasury. Disbursement.— Regents v. Dunn, 6 P. 377. 
 
 CONSPIRACY. 
 
 Conspiracy to commit crime. Prosecution and punishment.— People v. 
 Majors, 2 P. 744. 
 
 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 
 
 Compensation of justices and constables.— Westerfield v. Riverside County, 
 
 50 P. 929. 
 Delegation of power to judiciary.— Smith v. Strother, 7 P. 801. 
 Due process of law.— Bryant v. Bank of California, 8 P. 644. 
 Establishment of courts.— People v. Toal, 23 P. 208. 
 Ex post facto laws. Statute unconstitutional in part.— People v. McNulty, 
 
 28 P. 816. 
 Privileges and immunities. — Kerry v. Pacific Marine Supply Co., 54 P. 262. 
 Subject and title of acts. Amending act. — Lewis v. Colgan, 44 P. 1081; 
 
 People T. Parvin, 14 P. 783. 
 
 CONTEMPT. 
 
 Committing officer of court. Validity of judgment.— Ex parte Carroll, 34 
 
 P. 518. 
 Decisions reviewable. — Mott v. Clarke, 56 P. 545. 
 
 In petition for rehearing. Disavowal. — McCormick v. Sheridan, 20 P. 24. 
 What constitutes.— De Witt v. Superior Court of Fresno Couiity, 47 P. 871. 
 
 CONTINUANCE. 
 
 Discretion of court. — Eubens v. Mead, 53 P. 432. 
 
32 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 CONTRACTS. 
 
 Acceptance. Consideration. — Abbott v. 76 Land & Water Co., 53 P. 445. 
 Actions for breach. — Berry v. Kowalsky, 27 P. 286; 'Electric Imp. Co. v. 
 San Jose & S. C. K. Co., 31 P. 455; Remy v. Olds, S4 P. 216. 
 Damages for nonperformance. Harmless error. — Crawford v. Harris, 
 
 45 P. 819. 
 Evidence. — ^Ferguson v. McBean, 35 P. 559. 
 Instructions.— Bibb v. Bancroft, 22 P. 484. 
 
 Measure of damages. — Wiley v. California Hosi^i-y Co., 32 P. 522. 
 Pleading and proof. — Biggerstaff v. Briggs, 4 P. 371; Kladung v. Daw- 
 son, 43 P. 1107; Peterson v. Hubbard, 9 P. 106. 
 Waiver of objection. — Delafield v. San Francisco & S. M. R. Co., 
 40 P. 958. 
 Alteration. Construction. — Bank of Lemoore y. Gulart, 54 P. 1111. 
 Conditional liability.— Bagley v. Cohen, 50 P. 4. 
 Conditions. Breach. — Flynn v. Dougherty, 26 P. 831. 
 Consideration. — Bourn v. Dowdell, 50 P. 695; Farley v. Moran, 31 P. 158. 
 Construction. Actions for breach. — Barrett v. Austin, 31 P. 3; Fresno 
 Milling Co. V. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co., 36 P. 412. 
 Interpretation. — Bullock v. Consumers' Lumber Co., 31 P. 367. 
 Trial.— Nash v. Kreling, 56 P. 260, 262. 
 Construction and operation. — Dingley v. Greene, 6 P. 81; Martin v. 
 
 Hill, 3 P. 861; Id., 4 P. 1101; WiUlame v. Miller, 6 P. 14. 
 Damages. Evidence. — Biggerstaff v. Briggs, 4 P. 371. 
 Menace. Undue influence. — Bancroft v. Bancroft, 40 P. 488. 
 Modification of contract. Interest. — Haines v. Stilwell, 40 P. 332. 
 Parol evidence to explain. — San Diego Flume Co. v. Chase, 32 P.- 245. 
 Performance. — Irish v. Pauley, 49 P. 321. 
 Performance or breach. — Biggerstaff v. Briggs, 4 P. 371. 
 Questions for jury.— Biggerstaff v. Briggs, 4 P. 371. 
 Rescission and abandonment. — Potter v. Roeth, 7 P. 762. 
 
 Restoration of consideration. — Phelps v. Brown, 27 P. 420. 
 Validity. Pleadings.— Franz v. Bieler, 56 P. 249. 
 
 CONVERSION. 
 
 Measure of damages. — Niles v. Edwards, 27 P. 296. 
 
 CORPORATIONS. 
 
 Annulment of charter. Pleading. — People v. San Francisco Public Stock 
 
 Exchange, 33 P. 785. 
 Capital, stock, and dividends. Bonds. — Smith v. J"^erries & C. H. Ry. Co., 
 ' 51 P. 710. 
 Civil actions. Appeal and error. — Love v. Anchor Raisin Vineyard Co., 45 
 
 P. 1044. 
 Contract. Authority of officers. — Bank of Yolo v. Weaver, 31 P. 160. 
 Conveyances. Validity.— McCroskey v. Ladd, 28 P. 216. 
 Corporate powers and liabilities. — People's Ditch Co. v. '76 Land & Water 
 Co., 44 P. 176. 
 Contracts. — Granger v. Bourn, 7 P. 760; Hamilton v. Bates, 35 P.. 
 304; Smith v. Ferries & C. H. Ry. Co., 51 P. 710. 
 Effect of purchasing its own stock. Sale of its property. — Tulare Irriga-^ 
 
 tion Dist. v. Kaweah Canal & Irrigation Co., 44 P. 662. 
 Liability of oflBcers to corpox-ation. Action on treasurer's bond. — Mechan- 
 ics' Institute v. Firth, 49 P. 214. 
 Members and stockholders. Meetings. — Smith v. Ferries & C. H. Ry. Co.,, 
 51 P. 710. 
 Suits by stockholders. — Moyle v. Landers, 21 P. 1133. 
 Notice to officer. Declarations of president. — Love v. Anchor Raisin Vine- 
 yard Co., 45 P. 1044. 
 Officers and agents. Liability for corporate debts and acts. — San Ber- 
 nardino Nat. Bank v. Andreson, 32 P. 168. 
 Pleadings. Breach of contract. — Tustin Fruit Ass'u v. Earl Fruit Co., 53 
 P. 693. 
 
INDEX. 
 
 33 
 
 CORPORATIONS— Cont'd. 
 
 Recovery of stock assessments. — San Gabriel Val. Land & Water Co. v, 
 
 Dennis, 34 P. 441. 
 Stolen stock certificates. Rights of bona fide purcliaser. — Swim v. Ber- 
 nard, 4 P. 1172, 
 Subscriptions. Pleading.— Ventura & Ojai Val. Ry. Co. v. Collins, 46 P. 287. 
 Subscriptions to stock. Liability of subscriber.— Auburn Opera-House & 
 Pavilion Ass'n v. Hill, 32 P. 587. 
 Payment by note.— Pacific Trust Co. v. Dorsey, 13 P. 148. 
 Transfer of stock.— Tafft v. Presidio & F. R. Co., 22 P. 485. 
 
 COSTS. 
 
 Attorney's fee.— Grogan v. Nolan, 36 P. 397. 
 
 Phonographic reporters in criminal cases. Compensation.- People v. Beck- 
 er, 4 P. 942. 
 
 COUNTIES. 
 
 Authority of officers. Neglect of duty. — McPherson v. San Joaquin County, 
 56 P. 802. 
 
 Board of supervisors. Claim against county.— Placer County v. Camp- 
 bell, 11 P. 602. 
 
 Claim against county. Affidavit of claimant. — Ketchum v. Plumas County, 
 10 P. 114. 
 Warrants.— Capital Sav. Bank v. Oronkite, 4 P. 487. 
 
 County expenses and charges. Repair of highway.— Ludy v. Colusa Coun- 
 ty, 45 P. 166. 
 
 County government act. Constitutionality of provisions.— Fleckenstein v. 
 Placer County, 37 P. 931. 
 
 County officers.- Bosborough v. Boardman, 6 P. 449. 
 
 County supervisors. Liability of counties. — Shepherd v. Keagle, 53 P. 702. 
 
 Mandamus to county board. Advertising contract.— Maxwell v. Board of 
 Sup'rs of Los Angeles County, 32 P. 443. 
 
 Payment of taxes under protest. Action to recover. — Easterbrook v. City 
 and County of San Francisco, 44 P. 800. 
 
 Public debt. Organization of government. — San Diego County v. River- 
 side County, 55 P. 7. 
 
 Supervisors as road commissioners. Compensation.— Ellis v. Tulare Coun- 
 ty, 44 P. 675. 
 
 Taxation. Special assessments. — Easterbrook v. City and County of San 
 Francisco, 44 P. 800. 
 
 COURT COMMISSIONERS. 
 
 Powers. Reference.- .Tackson v. Puget Sound Lumber Co., 52 P. 838. 
 
 COURTS. 
 
 Appellate jurisdiction of supreme court. — People v. Bowers, 18 P. 660. 
 Jurisdiction. Amount involved. Interest— Howe v. Halsey, 54 P. 748. 
 
 Courts of particular states.— Galloway v. Jones, 13 P. 712. 
 Jurisdiction of superior court.— Pico v. Williams, 11 P. 600. 
 
 In actions against stockholders.— Evans v. Bailey, 6 P. 424. 
 
 Separate causes of action.— Lord v. Thomas, 27 P. 410. 
 Jurisdiction of supreme court.— Holmes v. Warren, 9 P. 71; Randall v. 
 Duff, 40 P. 386. 
 
 Amount Involved.— Ertle v. Placer County, 44 P. 229. 
 Suspension of rules of court.— Symons v. Bunnell, 20 P. 859. 
 
 COVENANTS. 
 
 Actions for breach. Judgment. — Holzheier v. Hayes, 52 P. 838. 
 
 CRIMINAL LAW. 
 
 Absence of instructions from record. Setting aside submission of cause.— 
 
 People V. Vital, 34 P. 617. 
 Appeal. Affirmance.- People v. Moran, 31 P. 853. 
 l>ismissal.— People v. Frlnk, 12 P. 616. 
 Instructions.— People v. Higgins, 12 P. 301. 
 
 CAL.OAS.— 3 
 
34 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 CRIMINAL LAW— Cont'd. 
 
 Appeal and error. Affirmance.— People v. Casteel, 34 P. 237. 
 
 Objection not raised in lower court.— People v. Lyle, 4 P. 977. 
 
 Record and proceedings not in record.— People v. Morgan, 28 P. 576. 
 
 State of execution.— People v. McNulty, 30 P. 963. 
 
 Sufficiency of evidence.— People v. Nagle, 29 P. 640. 
 Arraignment and pleas.— People v. O'Leary, 22 P. 24. 
 
 Entry by clerk.— People v. O'Leary, 16 P. 884. 
 Conduct of jury.— People v. Lyle, 4 P. 977. 
 Conduct of trial. View of jury.— People v. Fagan, 33 P. 846. 
 Confessions. Admissibility in general.— People v. Abbott, 4 P. 769. 
 
 Cauiion.— People v. Abbott, 4 P. 769. 
 
 Dying declarations.— People v. Abbott, 4 P. 769. 
 Continuance.— People v. Lee, 8 P. 685. 
 
 Appeal and error.— People v. Bell, 36 P. 94. 
 Defenses. Former jeopardy.— People v. O'Leary, 16 P. 884. 
 Degrees of crime. Finding of jury.— People v. Wing, 24 P. 1026. 
 Discrediting witness.— People v. Buckner, 4 P. 489. 
 Dying declarations. Admissibility of.— People v. Abbott, 4 P. 769. 
 Evidence. Intent.— People v. Hill, 34 P. 854. 
 
 Statements of confederates.— People v. Brady, 36 P. 949. 
 
 Verdict.— People v. Murray, 4 P. 504. 
 
 View of locus in quo.— People v. Jones, 11 P. 501. 
 Evidence of character of defendant.— People v. Lee, 8 P. 685. 
 Jurisdiction of superior court.— Ex parte Bell, 34 P. 641. 
 Misdemeanor. Venue.- — Ex parte Lou All Sun, 7 P. 305. 
 New trial.— People v. Fugitt, 46 P. 379. 
 
 Newly-discovered evidence. — People v. Kellelier, 16 P. 706; Same v. 
 Lyle, 4 P. 977. 
 Pleadings. Trial.— People v. Gilmore, 53 P. 806. 
 Review. — People v. Thompson, 46 P. 907. 
 
 Credibility of testimony.— People v. Belardes, 48 P. 624. 
 
 Instructions.— People v. Johnson, 8 P. 690. 
 
 Weight and sufficiency of evidence. — People v. Bennett, 50 P. 703. 
 Sending false telegram.— People v. Devon, 8 P. 93. 
 Sufficiency of verdict.— People v. O'Leary, 16 P. 884. 
 Trial. Conduct of jury.— People v. Growl, 34 P. 860. 
 
 Immaterial evidence. — People v. Garcia, 40 P. 114. 
 
 Instructions to jury.— People v. Carleton, 4 P. 763; People v. Wohl- 
 from, 26 P. 236. 
 
 Objections and exceptions. — People v. Abbott, 4 P. 769. 
 
 Refusal of instructions.— People v. Sullivan, 8 P. 520. 
 
 Requests for instructions.— People v. Wong Chow, 4 P. 7^. 
 
 Review.— People v. Short, 41 P. 802. 
 
 Sufficiency of instructions.— People v. Munn, 7 P. 790. 
 Verdict. Degree of guilt. — People v. Bannister, 34 P. 710; Same v. Corn- 
 well, 35 P. 566. 
 
 CUSTOMS DUTIES. 
 
 Bonded warehouse receipts. Storage of liquors.— Bliss v. Carroll, 9 P. 88. 
 
 DAMAGES. 
 
 Foreign debt. Breach of contract.— Grunwald v. Freese, 34 P. 73. 
 Measure of. Evidence of injuries to property.— Montgomery v. Locke, 11 
 P. 874. 
 Excessive damages. — Redfield v. Oakland Consol. St. R. Co., 42 P. 822. 
 Special damages. Actions.- Montgomery v. Locke, 11 P. 874. 
 
 DEATH. 
 
 Actions for causing death. Parties.— Redfield v. Oakland Consol. St. Ry. 
 Co., 42 P. 822. 
 
INDEX. 35 
 
 OEDICATIOX. 
 
 Acceptance. Revocation. — People v. Reed, 20 P. 708. 
 
 Filing plat. Right of action and defense.— City and County of San Fran- 
 cisco V. Burr, 36 P. 771. 
 
 Public street. Acceptance. — City of Eureka v. Oroghan, 19 P. 485. 
 
 What constitutes. Acceptance.— Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of 
 Los Angeles, 32 P. 240. 
 
 DEEDS. 
 
 Cancellation. Inadequacy of price.— Barry v. St. Joseph's Hospital & 
 
 Sanitarium of the Sisters of Mercy, 48 P. 68. 
 Consideration. Fraud.— B'ranicel v. Deidesheimer, 15 P. 429. 
 Construction. Condition.— State v. Folsom Water Co., 12 P. 388. 
 
 Exclusion of evidence.— Peres v. Crocker, 47 P. 928. 
 Delivery.— McGrath v. Hyde, 21 P. 948. 
 
 Presumption.- Gerke v. Cameron, 50 P. 434. 
 Description. Distances.— Hogins v. Boggs, 34 P. 653. 
 Description of grantee.- Ketchum v. Barber, 12 P. 251. 
 Mistake in description. Reformation.- Ross v. Williams, 15 P. 47. 
 Property conveyed. Construction and operation.— Pottkamp v. Buss, 31 P. 
 
 1121. 
 Record. Absence of stamps.— Bennett v. Morris, 37 P. 929. 
 Rights of grantor. Injunction.— Peterson v. Machado, 43 P. 611. 
 Title conveyed. Limitations.— Grant v. De Lamori, 14 P. 314. 
 Validity.^Gutierrez v. BrinkerhofC, 1 P. 482. 
 
 Actions for cancellation.— Rising v. Gibbs, 30 P. 589. 
 
 DESCENT AND DISTRIBUTION. 
 
 Rights and liabilities of distributees. Limitations and laches.^In re 
 
 Grider's Estate, 21 P. 532. 
 Rights of heirs.— In re Willey's Estate, 56 P. 550. 
 Rights of surviving wife. Homestead.— In re Fowler's Estate, 20 P. 81. 
 
 DISMISSAL AND NONSUIT. 
 
 Dismissal of action. Authority of attorney.— Magnolia & H. Fruit iCan- 
 
 nery y. Guerne, 31 P. 363. 
 Estoppel. Review.— Cleary v. Folger, 33 P. 877. 
 Evidence sustaining issues of complaint. — Craven v. Nolan, 8 P. 518. 
 Involuntary. Burden of proof.— Fitzgibbon v. Laumeister, 51 P. 1078. 
 
 Delay in prosecution.— Castro v. City ^nd County of San Fl'ancisco, 
 
 35 P. 1035. 
 Discretion of court.— Pacific Bridge Co. v. Jacobus. 13 P. 493. 
 Judgment of nonsuit. Admission as evidence.— Gates v. McLean, 9 P. 938. 
 Motion to dismiss. Time for making.— Neihaus v. Morgan, 45 P. 255. 
 Motion to vacate. Abuse of discretion. — Ashton v. Dashaway Ass'n, 33 
 
 P. 446. 
 Review of evidence. New trial.— Wells v. Snow, 41 P. 858. 
 Rights in general. Condition of cause.'— Heilbron v. Last Chance W. D. 
 
 Co., 9 P. 456. 
 Voluntary. Reinstatement of cause.— Truett v. Onderhook, 50 P. 394. 
 
 DISTRICT AND PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS. 
 
 Representation of county. Fees and costs.— San Diego County v. C. S. R, 
 Co., 1 P. 897. 
 
 DIVORCE. 
 
 Alimony.— Ex parte O'Brien, 48 P. 71. 
 
 Evidence of marriage.- Hite v. Hite, 55 P. 900. 
 
 Printing and counsel fees.— Wolff v. Wolff, 37 P. 858. 
 
 Support of child.— Meyer v. Meyer, 52 P. .485. 
 Alimony and costs.— White v. White, 33 P. 399. 
 A mensa et thoro.- Reade v. Reade, 22 P. 284. 
 Complaint. Description of property.— Mini v. Mini, 45 P. 1044. 
 Contempt. Habeas corpus.— Ex parte Robinson, 13 P., 852. 
 Cross complaint. Dismissal.— Mott v. Mott, 22 P. 1140. 
 Cruelty. Award of Community property.— Johnson v. Johnson, 35 P. 637. 
 
36 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 DIVORCE— Cont'd. 
 
 Custody of child. Increasing allowance.— Rogers v. Rogers, 31 P. 157. 
 Decree. Assignment of judgment to wife.— Haley v. Haley, 14 P. 92. 
 Division of community property. — Boyd v. Boyd, 31 P. 1108. 
 Evidence.— Haley v. Haley, 14 P. 92. 
 Grounds.— Haley v. Haley, 14 P. 92. 
 
 Joinder of parties. Causes of action.— Cummings v. Cummings, 14 P. 562. 
 Judgment. Estoppel.— Haley v. Haley, 14 P. 92. 
 
 Judgment for attorney's fees. Prohibition to restrain.— Reynolds v. Supe- 
 rior Court, 6 P. 421. 
 
 DRAINS. 
 
 Reclamation assessment. Apportionment.— Reclamation Dist. No. 307 v.. 
 
 Glide, 41 P. 278. 
 Swamp lands. Reclamation.— People v. Parvln, 14 P. 786. 
 
 EASEMENTS. 
 
 Flume constructed over another's land. Evidence of abandonment. — 
 
 Richard v. Hupp, 37 P. 920. 
 Surface water. Contiguous tracts of land.— West v. Girard, 4 P. 565. 
 Water rights.- Bell v. Sausalito Land & Ferry Co., 33 P. 449. 
 
 EJECTMENT. 
 
 Action by tenants in common. Review. — Moore v. Moore, 34 P. 90. 
 
 Actions. Cumulative remedy.— Trope v. Kerns, 20 P. 82. 
 Limitations and laches. — Greer v. Tripp, 12 P. 301. 
 Pleading.— Royon v. Guillee, 3 P. 672. 
 
 Adverse possession. Evidence.— Miller v. Benslnger, 31 P. 578. 
 
 Alias writ of possession. Adverse possession.- Rousset v. Reay, 31 P. 900. 
 
 Complaint. Sufficiency. — Gates v. McLean, 9 P. 938. 
 
 Defendant not in possession.— Partridge v. Shepard, 12 P. 351. 
 
 Defenses. Agreement to convey.— Gage v. Downey, 19 P. 113. 
 
 Equitable ejectment. — Royal v. Dennison, 38 P. 39. 
 
 Estoppel by record. Pleading and proof .—Scott v. Rhodes, 41 P. 878. 
 
 Evidence. Sufficiency.— Tibbets v. Baiewell, 35 P. 1007. 
 
 Findings. Sufficiency of evidence.— Daubenbiss v. White, 31 P. 360. 
 
 Homestead. Land bought on contract.— Alexander v. Jackson, 25 P. 415. 
 
 Instruction on evidence. Dismissal of verdict.— Jones v. Ohalfant, 31 P.- 
 257. 
 
 Judgment— Reay v. Butler, 7 P. 669. 
 
 Motion for nonsuit.— Stephens v. Hambleton, 47 P. 51. 
 
 New Trial. Judicial discretion.— Johnson v. Hancock, 4 P. 1093. 
 
 Outstanding title.— Robinson v. Thornton, 31 P. 936. 
 
 Pleading.— Allen v. Holt, 7 P. 421; Reay v. Butler, 7 P. 660. 
 Admission by answer. — Stites v. Gater, 45 P. 185. 
 Homestead.— Hutchinson v. McNally, 23 P. 132. 
 Judgment— Schwannecke v. Goodenow, 52 P. 588. 
 
 Pleading and evidence. Estoppel to claim adverse possession.— Dietz v. 
 Mission Transfer Co., 25 P. 423. 
 
 Pleading and proof. New Trial.— Jacob v. Carter, 36 P. 381. 
 
 Possession and ouster by defendant.— Evidence. Practice on appeal.. Ten- 
 ants in common.— Moore v. Moore, 34 P. 90. 
 
 Proof of ouster. Admissions in pleadings.— Ketchum v. Barber, 12 P. 251. 
 
 Review.— Schwannecke v. Goodenow, 52 P. 588. 
 
 Bight of action and defenses. — Cox v. Hayes, 7 P. 761; Todhunter v. Arm- 
 strong, 53 P. 446. 
 
 Bight to maintain action. Mortgage in form a deed. — Meeker v. Shus- 
 ter, 47 P. 580. 
 
 Satisfaction of judgment. Review.— Alexander v. Jackson, 25 P. 415. 
 
 Title to maintain.— City and County of San Francisco v. Grote, 47 P. 938. 
 
INDEX. 37 
 
 ELECTIONS. 
 
 Appointment, qualification, and tenure of officers. — People v. Walte, 36 P. 
 
 Ballots. Legality.— Smith v. Thomas, 52 P. 1079. 
 Illegal I votes. Evidence. — Smith v. Thomas, 52 P. 1079. 
 Notice.— People v. City of Riverside, 9 P. 662. 
 
 EMBEZZLEMENT 
 
 Defendant as witness. Cross-examination.— People v. McCarthy, 18 i-. 862. 
 Drawing funds from bank. Aiding and abetting.— People v. Gallagher, 53 
 
 P. 880. 
 Sufficiency of evidence.— People v. Jones, 8 P. 611; Same v. Van Sciever 
 
 42 f. 451. 
 Trial.— People v. Connelly, 38 P. 42. 
 
 EiMINENT DOMAIN. 
 
 Compensation. Measure and amount.— California Southern R. Co. v. Colton 
 
 Land & Water Co., 2 P. 38. 
 Proceeding to open private road. Validity.— Los Angeles County v. Reyes, 
 
 32 P. 233. 
 
 EQUITY. 
 
 Instructions. Verdict of jury.— Evans v. Ross, 8 P. 88. 
 Jurisdiction.— McDaniel v. Pattison, 27 P. 651. 
 Relief granted.- Oliver v. Blair, 8 P. 612. 
 
 ESTOPPEiL. 
 
 Equitable' estoppel. Grounds. — Smith v. Los Angeles & P. R. Co., 34 P. 
 
 242. 
 Estoppel in pais.— Warren v. Connor, 47 P. 48. 
 
 EVIDENCE. 
 
 Admissions of counsel. Action for personal injuries.- Payne v. Kripp, 4 
 
 P. 426. 
 Best and secondary evidence.— Grant v. Dreyfus, 52 P. 1074. 
 Booli of registered letters. Competency.— In re Kennedy's Estate, 36 P. 
 
 1030. 
 Burden of proof.— Kelley v. Sersanous, 46 P. 299. 
 
 Fraud.— Kelley v. Owens, 30 P. 596. 
 uompetency in general. Account-hooks.— Morgans v. Adel, 18 P. 247. 
 Deceased witness. Admissibility of testimony in another action.— Fred- 
 ericks V. Judah, 11 P. 133. 
 Expert evidence. — Egger v. Rhodes, 37 P. 1037. 
 Judgment. Judgment roll.— Packard v. Johnson, 4 P. 632. 
 Judicial notice. Judgments.— Stanley v. McElrath, 22 P. 673. 
 
 Matters.— Bituminous Lime Rock Pav. & Imp. Oo. v. Fulton, 33 P. 1117. 
 Weight and sufficiency.— Scanlan v. San Francisco & S. J. V. Ry. Co., 
 55 P. 694. 
 Judicial notice of legal distances.— Hegard v. California Ins. Co., 11 P. 594. 
 Objections for incompetency. — ^Marks v. Bodie Bank, 8 P. 807. 
 Opinion evidence. — Whitmore v. Ainsworth, 38 P. 196. 
 
 Expert testimony.— Fogel v. San Francisco & S. M. Ry. Co., 42 P. 565; 
 
 Grunwald v. Preese, 34 P. 73. 
 Medical expert. — People v. Brown, 13 P. 222, 
 Record of conviction of murder as. — Harris v. More, 5 P. 159. 
 Sufficiency. — Adelsdorfer v. Ehrman, 5 P. 915; Alemany v. Ortega, 4 P. 13; 
 Carroll v. Seymour, 26 P. 350; Carter v. Allen, 4 P. 1064; Cross v. Zel- 
 lerbach, 8 P. 714; fiolden State & Miner's Iron Works v. Muir, 8 P. 836; 
 Grange v. Gough, 4 P. 1177; Jones v. Meyer, 1 P. 892; Lang v. Specht, 
 5 P. 612; Manor v. Davis, 4 P. 400; Noce v. Daveggio, 4 P. 495; Paige 
 V. Rocky Ford Canal & Irrigation Co., 4 P. 1152; People v. Bennett, 3 P. 
 897; Same v. Carleton, 4 P. 763; Stout v. Hastings, Id. 1178; Van 
 Daalen v. City & County of San Francisco, 6 P. 689; Wilson v. Baker, 
 3 P. 109; White v. Douglass, 8 P. 801. 
 Weight and sufficiency.— Eppinger v. Kendrick, 44 P. 234; Peterson v. 
 Hubbard, 9 P. 106. 
 
38 CALIFORNIA CASES, 
 
 EXCEIPTIONS, BILL OF. 
 
 Requisites of petition.— In re Hawes' Estate, 11 P. 220. 
 
 EXECUTION. 
 
 Kecord as evidence.— Bryant v. Bank of California, 7 P. 128. 
 Sale. Satisfaction.— Poulke v. De Witt, 52 P. 476. 
 Sherife's deed.— Robinson v. Thornton, 31 P. 936. 
 Title of purchaser.— Purser v. Cady, 49 P. 180. 
 Satisfaction.— Ferrugeard v. Superior Court, 5 P. 612. 
 Supplementary proceedings.— Bryant v. Bank of California, 7 P. 128. 
 
 Contempt— Ex parte McDonald, 17 P. 234. 
 Undertakings to release levy. Liabilities.— McNamara v. Hammerslag, 2 
 
 P. 391. 
 What subject to. Interest of possible vendee.— Chadbourne v. Stockton 
 Sav. & Loan Soc, 36 P. 127. 
 
 EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS. 
 
 Accounting. Revieve of findings.— Raskin v. Robarts, 35 P. 763. 
 Accounting and settlement.— Hall v. Hebard, 8 P. 507; In re Sanderson'^ 
 Estate, 13 P. 497. 
 Allowances.— In re Murdock's Estate, 53 P. 792. 
 Attorney's fees. — ^Hinckley v. Stebbins, 29 P. 52. 
 Distribution of estate.— In re Lux's Estate, 35 P. 639. 
 Accounting by administrator. Objections to allowances. — In re Fisher's 
 
 Estate, 42 P. 237. 
 Accounting by trustee.— In re Hensing's Estate, 31 P. 578. * 
 Action against administrator. Services as nurse. — Todd v. Martin, 37 P. 
 
 872. 
 Action against executor. Money paid to testator as security. — Reiter v. 
 
 Rothschild, 33 P. 849. 
 Action on injunction bond. Attorney's fees.— Hooper v. Patterson, 32 P. 
 
 514. 
 Actions. Note deposited in trust company. — Cornwall v. McElrath. 39 P. 
 617. 
 Parties.— Kenney v. Parks, 54 P. 251. 
 Administrator with will annexed. Right to remove.— In re Id Po Tai's 
 
 Estate, 39 P. 30; Li Tai Wing v. Preese, Id. 30. 
 Appointment.— Clough v. Borello, 48 P. 330; In re Silvar's Estate, 46 P. 
 296. 
 Sales of realty.— Dennis v. Bint, 54 P. 378. 
 Authority of executor. Sale of currency. — ^In re Estate of Sanderson, 13 P. 
 
 497. 
 Claims against decedent's estate. Evidence.— Robinson v. Dugan, 35 P. 
 
 902. 
 Conveyance for individual debt Limitations.— Horton v. Jack, 37 P. 652. 
 Decree of distribution. Construction.— Hinckley v. Stebbins, 29 P. 52. 
 Distribution of estate. — In re Welch's Estate, 41 P. 791; Welch v. Youngs 
 Id. 
 Action for removal.- In re Moore's Estate, 22 P. 653. 
 Execution sale. Purchase by trustee.— Sedgwick v. Sedgwick, 4 P. 570. 
 Foreign executrix. Authority over local assets.— Lewis v. Adams, 8 P 619.. 
 Right to maintain action. Limitation and laches.— Lewis v. Adams, 
 7 P. 779. 
 Individual liability. Evidence.— Malville v. Kappeler, 37 P. 934. 
 Joint executors. Several liability.— In re Sanderson's Estate, 13 P. 497. 
 Leases. Accounting and settlement.— In re Brannan's Estate, 51 P. 320. 
 Negligence. Liability.— In re Sanderson's Estate. 13 P. 497. 
 Order for decree or distribution of estate. — ^William Hill Co. v. Lawler, 45 
 
 P. 847. 
 Petition to sell land. Necessity of proof Loss of rents. Value. Leases. 
 
 —In re Brannan's Estate, 51 P. 320 
 Presentation and payment o*" claims. Allowance by administratrix. — 
 
 Wise V. Williams, 42 P. 573. 
 Presentation of claims. Evidence. — Bank of Chico v. Spect, 11 P. 740. 
 
INDEX. 39 
 
 EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS— Cont'd. 
 
 Probate practice. Review on appeal.— In re Bullard's Estate, 31 P. 1119. 
 
 Revocation of letters. Notice.— Barrett v. Superior Court of Placer Coun- 
 ty, 47 P. 592. 
 
 Revoking probate of will. Allegations of petition.— In re Crozier's Estate, 
 4 f. 412. 
 
 Rights of sole legatee. Community property.— In re Burdick's Estate, 40 
 P. 35. 
 
 Sale by executor under power. Claim against estate.— In re Williams' Es- 
 tate, 32 P. 241; Appeal of Magee, Id. 
 
 S4.1es under order of court. Collateral attack.— Burris v. Kennedy, 38 P. 
 971. 
 
 Services of attorney. Employment by executor.— Malville v. Kappeler, 37 
 P. 934. 
 
 Settlement of administrator's account. Vouchers.— In re Van Tassel's Es- 
 tate, 5 f. 611. 
 
 Settlement of estate. Appeal by executor.— In re Burdick's Estate, 40 P. 35. 
 
 EXEMPTIONS. 
 
 Property and rights exempt— McCue v. Tunstead, 3 P. 863. 
 
 FACTORS. 
 
 Commissions. Discharge. — Miller v. Price, 39 P. 781. 
 
 Consignment for sale. Lien for advances.— Miller v. Price, 39 P. 781. 
 
 Lien. Conversion.— Lehmann v. Schmidt, 22 P. 973; Id., 24 P. 120. 
 
 FINDINGS. 
 
 Conflict of evidence. Appeal and error.— Whitesides v. Briggs, 7 P. 830. 
 
 FIRE INSURANCE. 
 
 Depreciation of property. Recovery of policy. Findings.— Hegard v. Cal- 
 ifornia Ins. Co., 11 P. 594. 
 
 FIXTURE'S. 
 
 Engine and machinery.— McNally v. Connolly, 9 P. 169. 
 Vendor and vendee. Right to remove houses.— Miller v. Waddingham, 25 
 P. 688. 
 
 FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER. 
 
 Complaint. Cause of action.— Porter v. Murray, 12 P. 425. 
 Motion for nonsuit. Findings.— Porter v. Murray, 12 P. 425. 
 Plaintiff's possession. Sufficiency.— Saulque v. Durralde, 33 P. 1090. 
 What constitutes. Evidence.— Lasserot v. Gamble, 46 P. 917. 
 
 FORGERY. 
 
 Appeal and error.- People v. Dole, 51 P. 945. 
 
 Evidence. Instructions.- People v. Dole, 51 P. 9-15. 
 
 Evidence of damages.— People v. Phillips, 9 P. 312. 
 
 Subject. JBvldence. Trial. Variance.— People v. Munroe, 33 P. 776. 
 
 Trial. Variance.- People v. Munroe, 33 P. 776. 
 
 Variance. Evidence.— People v. Oubridge, 56 P. 442. 
 
 FRAUD. 
 
 Evidence.— Lay son v. Spencer, 53 P. 1073; Price v. Same, Id. 
 
 Grounds of action. Principal and agent. Rights and liabilities inter sese. 
 
 — Ritchey v. McMichael, 35 P. 151. 
 Limitation of actions. Review.— Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Min. Co., 
 
 53 P. 32. 
 Pleading and proof. Exceptions.— Sukeforth v. Lord, 23 P. 296. 
 Pleadings. New trial.— Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Min. Co., 53 P. 32. 
 
 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF. „„„..,. 
 
 Signature of party to be charged.— Dupuy v. MacLeod, 33 P. 1115. 
 
40 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 feaudullBnt conveyances. 
 
 Action to set aside. Review on appeal.— Claris v. Olson, 33 P. 274. 
 Between husband and wife. Motion to set aside.— Tlirelkel v. Scott, 34 P. 
 
 851. 
 Change of possession.— Cameron v. Oalberg, 31 P. 530. 
 
 Consideration. Cancellation of debt. Preference by insolvent.— Ken- 
 nedy V. Oonroy, 44 P. 795. 
 Evidence. — Freeman v. Hensley, 30 P. 792; Stratton v. Burr, 54 P. 735. 
 Conveyance in consideration of marriage. Validity. — Klauber v. Vigneron, 
 
 oi P. 248. 
 Gifts. Who may set aside.— Windhaus v. Bootz, 25 P. 404. 
 Insolvency of grantor. Evidence.— Hay ford v. Wallace, 46 P. 293; Id. 301. 
 Pleading. Complaint. — Fox v. Dyer, 22 P. 257. 
 Possession. Evidence. — Roberts v. Burr, 54 P. 849. 
 Preference. Cancellation of debt as consideration. — Kennedy v. Oonroy, 
 
 44 P. 795. 
 Remedies of creditors and purchasers. Review.— Smith v. Ellis, 35 P. 764. 
 Review. Nonsuit. Burden of proof.— Fitzgibbon v. Laumeister, 51 P. 1078. 
 Transfers and transactions invalid.— James v. Fulkerth, 7 P. 768. 
 
 G 
 
 GAMING. 
 
 Options. Acceptance.— Buttner v. Smith, 36 P. 652. 
 
 GIFTS. 
 
 Delivery. Demand.— Knight v. Tripp, 49 P. 838. 
 
 Inter vivos. Undue influence.— Richards v.'Donner, 11 P. 770. 
 
 GOOD WUjL. 
 
 Sale of good will. Action for breach of contract.— Prior v. Diggs, 31 P. 155. 
 GRAND .JURY. 
 
 Contempt. — Kelly v. Wilson, 11 P. 244. 
 GRAND LARCENY. 
 
 Order granting new trial aflirmed.— People v. McGinn, 7 P. 762. 
 GUARANTY. 
 
 Discharge of guarantor.— Bagley v. Cohen, 50 P. 4. 
 GUARDIAN AND WARD. 
 
 Action on note to guardian. Pleading. Construction of mortgage. At- 
 torney's fees.— Salnsevain v. Luce, 35 P. 1033. 
 
 Appointment. Issue of letters.— Whyler v. Van Tiger, 14 P. 846. 
 
 Lease in individual name.— Whyler v. Van Tiger, 14 P. 846. 
 
 Liabilities on bonds. Sureties. — Spencer v. Houghton, 6 P. 853. 
 
 H 
 
 HABEAS CORPUS. 
 
 Commitment for murder. Evidence.— Ex parte Winthrop, 40 P. 751. 
 
 Discharge of prisoner. — Ex parte Vinton, 47 P. 1019. 
 
 Evidence. Relief.— Ex parte Sternes, 21 P. 1132. 
 
 Failure to bring to trial.— Ex parte Strong, 31 P. 574. 
 
 Prisoner properly in custody. — Ex parte Finley, 4 P. 881. 
 
 Probable cause for commitment— Ex parte Chatfield, 36 P. 948. 
 
 Proceedings.— Ex parte Henion, 55 P. 326; In re Patterson, 7 P. 709. 
 
 Return. Expiration of sentence.— Ex parte Murphy, 37 P. 468. 
 
 Return of writ.— Ex parte Bailey, 3 P. 107. 
 HIGHWAYS. 
 
 Authority of supervisors. Province of court.— Butte County v. Boydstun, 
 11 P. 781. 
 
 Dedication as highway.— Sllva v. Spangler, 43 P. 617. 
 Acceptance.— McKenzie v. Gilmore, 33 P. 262. 
 Evidence.— Hibberd v. Mellville, 33 P. 201. 
 
INDEX. 41 
 
 HIGHWAYS— Cont'd. 
 
 Obstruction.— Meyers v. Xelson, 44 P. 801. 
 
 Road overseer. Authority to do worls.— Ludy v. Colusa County, 41 P. 300. 
 
 What constitutes. User.- Sutton v. Nicolaisen, 44 P. 805. 
 HOMESTEAD. 
 
 Abandonment. Waiver or forfeiture of homestead.— Bull v. Coe, 15 P. 
 123, 124. 
 
 Acquisition and establishment. Declaration or certificate.— Knock v. Bun- 
 nell, 21 P. 961. 
 
 Extent of right. Property used in connection with dwelling. — In re Allen, 
 16 P. 319. 
 
 Filing declaration. Abandonment, waiver, or forfeiture. — Maloney v. 
 Hefer, 15 P. 763. 
 
 Mortgage. Foreclosure. — Bull v. Coe, 15 P. 123, 124. 
 
 Mortgage by widow. Rights of minor children.— Hoppe v. Hoppe, 36 P. 
 389; Fountain v. Same, Id. 
 
 Property constituting homestead. Wife's separate property.— In re Acker- 
 man's Estate, 22 P. 141. 
 
 Transfer or incumbrance. Protection and enforcement of rights.— Mc- 
 Harry v. Stewart, 35 P. 141. 
 
 What constitutes.— McDowell's Estate v. His Creditors, 37 P. 203. 
 Residence.— Grange v. Gough, 4 P. 1177. 
 
 Widow's right. Conveyance.— In re King's Estate, 36 P. 806. 
 
 HOMICIDE. 
 
 Appeal and error. Record. Proceedings not in record.- People v. Bow- 
 ers, 18 P. 660. 
 Conduct of prosecuting attorney. Instructions.— People v. Bowers, 18 P. 
 
 660. 
 Evidence.— People v. Munn, 7 P. 790. 
 
 Competency of witnesses. — People v. French, 7 P. 822. 
 
 Expert testimony.— People v. Sullivan, 8 P. 520. 
 
 Impeaching witness.— People v. Kilvington, 36 P. 13. 
 
 Instructions.— People v. Strybe, 36 P. 3. 
 Excusable or justifiable homicide.— People v. Button, 38 P. 200. 
 Indictment and information. — People v. Biggins, 3 P. 858. 
 
 Criminal negligence.— People v. Kilvington, 36 P. 13. 
 Instructions.— People v. Silvas, 5 P. 246. 
 Justifiable homicide. Self-defense.^People v. Lee, 8 P. 685. 
 Making or affecting arrest. Exercise of authority by officer.— People v. 
 
 Kilvington, 36 P. 13. 
 Manslaughter. Elements of voluntary manslaughter.— People v. Biggins, 
 
 3 P. 853. 
 Murder. Admissibihty of declarations of deceased.— People v. Sullivan, 8 
 P. 520. 
 
 Evidence.— People v. Reed. 52 P. 835. 
 ■Order of testimony. Examination of experts. — People v. Bowers, 18 P. 660. 
 Question by the court. Examination of defendant.— People v. Bowers, 18 
 
 P. 660. 
 Review.— People v. Morasco, 38 P. 423. 
 
 Writ of error.— People v. McNulty, 33 P. 900. 
 Self-defense. Instructions.— People v. Bruggy, 26 P. 756. 
 Trial.— People v. McSweeney, 38 P. 743. 
 
 Discretion of court.— People v. Denomme, 56 P. 98. 
 
 Evidence.— People v. Bowers, 18 P. 660. 
 
 Instructions.— People v. Biggins, 3 P. 853. 
 
 Review.— People v. Vincent, 33 P. 900. 
 
 Verdict— People v. French, 7 P. 822. 
 Verdict. Evidence.— Peo'ple v. Evans, 41 P. 444. 
 
 HUSBAND AND WIFE. 
 
 Action for support. Allowance.— Benton v. Benton, 55 P. 152. 
 Community property.— Labish v. Hardy, 23 P. 123. 
 Actions.— Wright v. Wright, 41 P. 695. 
 
42 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 HUSBAND AND WIFE— Cont'd. 
 
 Contract of husband. Lien on land of wife.— Santa Cruz Rock Pav. Co. 
 
 V. Lyons, 43 P. 599. 
 Execution against husband. Levy on wife's property.— Paden v. Gold- 
 
 baum, 37 P. 759. 
 Occupation of government land. Bona fide possessor.— Whelan v. Brickell, 
 
 33 P. 396. 
 Right of action against husband. Liability for wife's necessaries.— Nissen 
 
 V. Bendixen, 9 P. 111. 
 Rights of action between husband and wife. Fraudulent conveyance. — 
 
 Cummings v. Cummings, 14 P. 562. 
 Right to maintenance. Condonation.— Wade v. Wade, 31 P. 258. 
 Support of husband. Liability of wife. — Livingston v. Conant, 51 P. 859. 
 
 INDICTMENT AND INFORMATION. 
 
 Duplicity. Amendment— People v. Clement, 35 P. 1022. 
 
 INFANTS. 
 
 Actions. Limitation and laches. — Ganahl v. Sober, 5 P. 80. * 
 
 Minor's promissory note. Disaifirmance.- Combs v. Hawes, 8 P. 597. 
 
 INJUNCTION. 
 
 Actions for injunction. Evidence. — Heilbron v. Last Chance W. D. Co., 
 
 9 P. 456. 
 Action on bond. Pending appeal.— Adams v. Andross, 20 P. 26. 
 
 Sufficiency of complaint. — Curtiss v. Bachman, 40 P. 801. 
 Against trespass. Complaint— Sisson, Crocker & Co. v. Johnson, 34 P. 617. 
 Application for injunction. Ambiguity. — Grimes v. Linscott 40 P. 421. 
 Continuing, vacating, or dissolving. Amended complaint. — Shipman v. 
 
 Superior Court, 12 P. 787. 
 Dissolution. — Qhace v. Jennings, 28 P. 681. 
 
 Grounds.- Fowler v. Heinrath, 2 P. 248. 
 Enforcement. Judgment. — Heim v. Butin, 40 P. 39. 
 Liabilities on bonds or undertakings. — California Ins. Co. v. Schindler, 1 
 
 P. 474. 
 Pleading. Relief.— Lawrence v. Getchel, 4 P. 544. 
 xteview.— Union Transp. Co. v. Bassett, 46 P. 907. 
 
 Subjects of protection and relief. Pleading. — Crescent City Mill & Trans- 
 portation Co. V. Hayes, 11 P. 319. 
 Title of plaintiff.- Ol-amer V. Kester, 36 P. 415. 
 Sufficiency of complaint— Oliver v. Blair, 6 P. 847. 
 To county auditor. Illegal payment of claims.— Winn v. Shaw, 25 P. 244. 
 
 INSANE PERSONS. 
 
 Expert testimony. Intentional killing of insured.- Marceau v. Travellers' 
 Ins. Co. 01 Hartford, 36 P. 813. 
 
 INSOLVENCY. 
 
 Action by assignee. Findings.- — Haight v. Sexton, 42 P. 637. 
 Discharge of insolvent. Discretion of the court. — Longnecker v. His Cred- 
 itors, 17 P. 220. 
 Distribution of insolvent's estate. Pleadings.— Meherin v. Saunders, 56 P. 
 
 lliO. 
 
 Evidence.— Clarke v. Mott, 33 P. 884. 
 
 Insolvent acts. Fraudulent transfers.— Salisbury v. Burr, 44 P. 461. 
 
 Involvmtary notice to creditors.- Ohleyer v. Bunce, 3 P. 105. 
 
 Jurisdiction. Foreign corporation.— In re Castle Dome Mining & Smelting 
 
 Co., 18 P. 794. 
 Liability of assignee. Sale of assets.— In re Nichol's Estate, 50 P. 1072. 
 Preference of insolvent. Suit to set aside.— Smith v. Pratt, 37 P. 1033'. 
 Proceeding to vacate discharge. Parties.— Wagner v. Superior Court of 
 
 Los Angeles County, 34 P. 648. 
 Eights of assignee.— Kirk v. Roberts, 31 P. 620/ 
 
INDEX. 
 
 43 
 
 INSOLVENCY— Cont'd. 
 
 Rights, remedies, and discharge of insolvent. — Mooney v. Detrick, 22 P. 
 
 nil. 
 Secured claims. Costs.— In re Harvey, 32 P. 567; Appeal of Champlin, Id. 
 Voluntary insolvency. Statutory provisions.— In re Thomas, 44 P. 327. 
 
 INSURANCE. 
 
 Assignment of policy. Action by assignee.— Gilman v. Curtis, 3 P. 114. 
 Breach of conditions of policy. Action on policies.— Rankin v. Amazon 
 
 Ins. CO., 25 P. 260; Smith v. Phenix Ins. Co., 23 P. 383. 
 False statements. Waiver. — Bayley v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., 
 
 56 P. 638. 
 Fire insurance. Actions. — Hegard v. California Ins. Co., 11 P. 594. 
 Actions on policies.— Garido v. American Cent. Ins. Co., 8 P. 512. 
 Waiver of notice. — ^Locey v. American Cent. Ins. Co., 11 P. 791; Same 
 V. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., Id.; Same v. Pacific Fire Ins. Co., Id. 
 Insurable interest Mortgages.— Breedlove v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. 
 
 Soc, 54 P. 93. 
 Life insurance. Forfeiture.— Saa Francisco Sav. Union v. Long, 53 P. 907. 
 Mutual benefit insurance. Action on certificate.— Himmelein v. Supreme 
 
 Council American Legion of Honor, 33 P. 1130. 
 Pleadings. Subrogation.— San Francisco Sav. Union v. Long, 53 P. 907. 
 Proofs of loss. Reinsurance.— Whitney v. American Ins. Co., 56 P. 50. 
 
 INTEREST. 
 
 Computation. Interest on compound interest— Fisk v. Lee, 12 P. 255. 
 Judgment. Appeal.— Heinlen v. Beans, 12 P. 169. 
 Rate. Acceptance.— Thompson v. Corner, 36 P. 434. 
 
 INTOXICATING LIQUOR. 
 
 Authority of board of supervisors.— People v. Dwyer, 4 P. 451. 
 Licenses.— Colusa County v. Seube, 53 P. 654. 
 
 Constitutionality of ordinance.— Holmquist, Ex parte, 27 P. 10S9. 
 Regulation. Validity of ordinance. — Amador County v. Isaacs, 11 P. 758. 
 
 J 
 
 JUDGES. 
 
 Bias. Disqualification.— Heilbron v. Campbell, 23 P. 122; McDowell v. 
 Levy, 8 P. 857. 
 Removal of cause.— Gage v. Downey, 19 P. 113. 
 Disqualification to act.— Heilbron v. Campbell, 24 P. 930. 
 
 JUDGMENT. 
 
 Action. Defense of nul tiel record. — ^Reynolds v. Robertson, 4 P. 1192. 
 By default Opening or setting aside.— Boyle v. Solstien, 16 P. 898; Rem- 
 nant V. HofEman, 11 P. 319. 
 Collateral attack.— Trope v. Kerns, 20 P. 82. 
 
 Res judicata.- Smith v. Los Angeles & P. R. Co., 34 P. 242. 
 Conclusiveness to bar subsequent action.— People v. HoUaday, 5 P. 798. 
 Construction.— Walsh v. Hyland, 54 P. 148. 
 
 Costs.— Cline v. Robbins, 55 P. 150. 
 Construction and operation.— Dennis v. Bint, 54 P. 378; More v. Miller, 54 
 
 P. 1077, Same v. More, Id. 
 Correction.- Davis v. Lamb, 35 P. 306. 
 Default.— McDonald v. City of Placerville, 55 P. 600. 
 
 Opening or setting aside.— Heinlen v. Erlanger, 3 P. 129. 
 
 Vacation. — Mowry v. Nunez, 33 P. 1122. 
 Definiteness. Ultimate facts.— Wheelock v. Godfrey, 35 P. 320. 
 Description of property.— Chapman v. Polack, 5 P. 232. 
 Enforcement. Review.— Ramsbottom v. Fitzgerald, 55 P. 984. 
 Entry on a verdict against one defendant only.— Etter v. Hughes, 41 P. 790. 
 Equitable relief.— Merriman v. Walton, 38 P. 1108. 
 
 Judgment by default Affidavit to set aside.— Jenkins v. Gamewell Fire 
 Alarm Tel. Co., 31 P. 570. 
 
44 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 JUDGMENT— Cont'd. 
 
 Judgments operative as bar. CJonstruction of judgment.— LlUis v. Peo- 
 ple's IMtch Co., 29 P. 780. 
 Opening or vacating.— People v. Harrison, 22 P. 1143. 
 Payment, interpleader.— Wheelock v. Godfrey, 35 P. 315. 
 Res judicata.— Hughes v. Mendocino, 4 P. 236. 
 Evidence.— Lord v. Thomas, 36 P. 3T2. 
 Final judgment. — Fresno Milling Co. t. Fresno Canal & Irrigation 
 
 Co., 36 P. 410. 
 Judgments operative as bar.— Phillips v. Winter, 37 P. 154. 
 Questions determined.— Lillis v. People's Ditch Oo., 34 P. 715. 
 Satisfaction.— Musser v. Gray, 31 P. 568. 
 Setting aside default. Accident and surprise. — Heinlen v. OenterviUe & 
 
 Kingsbury Irr. Ditch Co., 4 P. 417. 
 Vacating default.— Vermont Marble Co. v. Black, 38 P. 512. 
 Vacating or setting aside. — Hanson v. Hanson, 20 P. 736; Merced County 
 V. Hicks, 7 P. 180: TufEree v. Stearns Kanchos Co., 54 P. 826. 
 Newly-discovered evidence. — Cox v. O'Neil, 4 P. 456. 
 Written findings.— Sullivan v. Hume, 33 P. 1121. 
 Validity and effect. Res judicata. — Gage v. Downey, 19 P. 113. 
 
 JUDICIAL SALES. 
 
 Rights of purchaser.— Judson v. Lyford, 23 P. 58. 
 JURY. 
 
 Challenge. Exceptions.— People v. Brown, 13 P. 222. 
 
 Compensation.— Ex parte Makinney, 3 P. 253. 
 
 Qualification. Secondary evidence.— People v. Davis, 36 P. 96. 
 
 Right to trial by jury.— Taylor v. Ford, 24 P. 942. 
 
 Waiver of right.— Bullock v. Consumers' Lumber Co., 31 P. 367. 
 
 Waiver of jury trial. Special findings.— Montgomery v. Sayre, 25 P. 552. 
 
 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. 
 
 Action on contract Appeal and error.— Alpers v. Superior Court of City 
 
 and County of San Francisco, 4 P. 504. 
 Appeal. Judgment entered by consent.— Yeazell v. Superior Court of City 
 and County of San Francisco, 4 P. 503. 
 Remand of cause.— Maxson v. Superior Court of Madera County, 54 P. 
 520. 
 Appeal and error. Filing of bond.— Perkins v. Superior Court of Fresno 
 County, 37 P. 780. 
 Undertaking. — ^Herting v. Superior Court, 10 P. 514. 
 Filling vacancies. — People v. Sands, 35 P. 330. 
 Jurisdiction.- Ex parte Cook, 39 P. 16; People v. Veuve, 3 P. 862. 
 Notice of appeal. Evidence of filing. — Williams v. Superior Court of Las- 
 sen County, 47 P. 783. 
 Review of proceedings. — Burgess v. Superior Court, 13 P. 166. 
 
 XANDLOBD AND TE^'ANT. 
 
 Adverse possession.— Sawyer v. Sargent, 7 P. 120. 
 Assignment of lease. Review.— Dietz v. Kucks, 45 P. 832. 
 Lease. Breach of covenant. — Heywood v. Berkeley Land & Town Imp. 
 Ass'n, 11 P. 246. 
 Cancellation.— Davis v. McGrew, 8 P. 618. 
 Lease of timber land. Construction.— Baird v. Milford Land & Lumber 
 
 Co., 27 P. 296. 
 Liability of landlord. Injury to tenant's health.— Angevine v. Knox- 
 Goodrich, 31 P. 529. 
 Pledge of crops for rent. Oral agreement— Stockton Savings & Loan Soc. 
 
 V. Purvis, 42 P. 441. 
 Rights of creditors of lessee.— Stockton Savings & Loan Soc. v. Purvis, 42 
 P. 441. 
 
INDEX. 45* 
 
 LANDLORD AND TENANT— Cont'd. 
 
 Bight to crops. Rights and liabilities of purchasers of property.— Farnum. 
 
 V. Hefner, 16 P. 324. 
 Sale of leasehold. Accounting for rent.— Appleby v. Jansen's Heirs, 33 P.- 
 
 438. 
 
 LARCENY. 
 
 Evidence. Conviction of lesser offense.— People v. Comyns, 45 P. 1034. 
 Findings.— People v. St. Clair, 44 P. 234. 
 Instructions.- People v. Nicolsi, 34 P. 824. 
 Prosecution and punishment. Evidence.— People v. Curran, 31 P. 1116. 
 Trial and review. Question for jury.— People v. Grider, 3 P. 492. 
 LIBEL AND SLANDER. 
 
 Complaint. Allegations on Information and belief.— McKinney v. Roberts,. 
 
 8 P. 3. 
 Costs. Counsel fees as part of.— McKinney v. Roberts, 8 P. 3. 
 Evidence. Argument of counsel. — Matts v. Borba, 37 P. 159; Sesler v. 
 
 Montgomery, 19 P. 686. 
 Evidence of defendant's wealth. Declaration of co-conspirator.- Barkly 
 
 V. Copeland, 25 P. 405. 
 Privileged communications. Publication.— Sesler v. Montgomery, 19 P. 686. 
 LICENSES. 
 
 Parol license. Revocation.— Flick v. Bell, 42 P. 813. 
 LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. 
 
 Accrual of cause of action. Petersen v. Taylor, 33 P. 436; Thomas v. 
 
 Pacific Beach Co., 44 P. 475. 
 Estoppel to plead. Demurrer. — Palmtag v. Roadhouse, 34 P. 111. 
 Findings. Reversal. — Porteous v. Reed, 12 P. 117. 
 Limitations in particular actions. — Smith v. Irving, 22 P. 170. 
 New promise.— Southern Pac. Co. v. Prosser, 52 P. 836. 
 Pleading. — Packard v. Johnson, 4 P. 632. 
 Running of statute. Acknowledgment.— Rose v. Foord, 28 P. 229. 
 
 Vendor and vendee.— Luco v. Toro, 18 P. 866. 
 Waiver. — Cross v. Zellerbach, 8 P. 714. 
 
 LOGS AND LOGGING. 
 
 Sale. Inspection of logs;— Bullock v. Consumers' Lumber Co., 31 P. 367. 
 
 M 
 
 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. 
 
 Complaint. Sufficiency.— Runk v. San Diego Flume Co., 43 P. 518. 
 Termination of prosecution. Probable cause. — Holliday v. Holliday, 53 
 
 P. 42. 
 Trial. Instructions.— Holliday v. Holliday, 53 P. 42. 
 
 MANDAMUS. 
 
 Acts and proceedings of public officers and boards.— Marion v. Board of 
 
 Education of City of Oakland, 32 P. 644. 
 Application for writ.— Snow v. Stanislaus County Sup'rs, 6 P. 90. 
 
 Limitation and laches.— Anderson v. Burkhart, 5 P. 612. 
 Board of supervisors. Repeal of resolution. — People v. Bartlet, 5 P. 674. 
 Defense.— Livingston v. Widber, 47 P. 247. 
 Motion to quash. Affidavit for.- Kahn v. Bauer, 12 P. 477. 
 Parties. Appointment of police commissioners. — People v. Budd, 47 P. 594. 
 Peremptory writ.— Clark v. Budd, 27 P. 759; Palmer v. Snyder, 5 P. 609. 
 
 Contents of record. Service.— Wilson v. Hunt, 16 P. 305. 
 Petition for writ. Demurrer. — Meyer v. Brown, 4 P. 25; Santa Cruz Gap 
 
 Turnpike Joint-Stock Co. v. Board of Sup'rs of Santa Clara County, 10' 
 
 P. 404. 
 practice. Subjects and purposes of relief.— Home for Care of Inebriates v.. 
 
 Beis, 27 P. 310. 
 irroceedings and relief. Application for writ— Smith v. Dunn, 6 P. 848. 
 
46 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 MANDAMUS— Cont'd. 
 
 Kefusal to hear case. — Davis v. Wallace, 38 P. 1107. 
 Remedy by appeal.— Tlbbetts v. Campbell, 27 P. 531. 
 Subjects and purposes of relief. Act and proceedings of public officers.— 
 
 Keating v. Jidgar, 3 P. 594. 
 Sufficiency of petition. — Sankey v. Society of California Pioneers, 9 P. 424. 
 To state board of dental examiners. Sufficiency of petition.— Van Vleck v. 
 
 Board of Dental Examiners of California, 48 P. 223. 
 When lies. County officers.- Ward v. Forliner, 50 P. 713. 
 Writ issued.— Davis v. Porter, 4 P. 647. 
 
 MARRIAGE. 
 
 Authority to perform.- Hunter v. Milam, 41 P. 332. 
 Proceeding to annul. Fraud. — ^Franke v. Ftanke, 31 P. 571. 
 
 MASTER AND SERVANT. 
 
 Contract of employment.— Luce v. San Diego Land & Town Co., 37 P. 390. 
 Fellovs^ servants. Who are fellow servants.— Bums v. Sennett, 44 P. 1068. 
 Injury to employe. Defective appliances.— Lyons v. Knowles, 32 P. 883. 
 
 Pleading.— Matthews v. Bull, 47 P. 773. 
 Injury to servant. Assumption of risk.— Magee v. North Pac. Coast R. 
 
 Co., 20 P. 709. 
 Iden for services. Employes of corporations.- Spaulding y. Mammoth 
 Spring Min. Co., 49 P. 183. 
 Enforcement— Ascha v. Fitch, 46 P. 298. 
 Master's liability. Fellow servants. — Matthews v. Bull, 47 P. 773. 
 
 Knowledge of danger.— Wright v. Pacific Coast Oil Co., 53 P. 1086. 
 Negligence of master. Contributory negligence.— Ingerman v. Moore, 25 
 
 P. 275. 
 Services and compensation. Declaration of agent. — ^Mutter v. I X L 
 Lime Co., 42 P. 1068. 
 
 MECHANICS' LIENS. 
 
 Action to enforce. Pleading. — Kuschel v. Hunter, 50 P. 397. 
 Building contract. Payments. — Stimson Mill Co. v. Riley, 42 P. 1072. 
 Claim of lien. — Gordon Hardware Co. v. San Francisco & S. R. Co., 22 P. 
 406. 
 Sufficiency. — Neihaus v. Morgan, 45 P. 255. 
 Contract. Rights of subcontractors. — Dunlop v. Kennedy, 34 P. 92. 
 Effect of advancements. — Shuffleton v. Hill, 7 P. 7. 
 Execution of contract. Actions to enforce. — Skym v. Weske Consol. Co., 
 
 47 P. 116. . 
 Filing claim. Sufficiency. — Harmon v. San Ftancisco & S. R. Co., 23 P. 
 
 1024. 
 Foreclosure. Pleading.— Doggett v. Bellows, 6 P. 421. 
 House on another's lot. — Fresno Loan & Savings Bank v. Husted, 49 P. 
 
 195. 
 Liens of material men. Proceedings to perfect. — Board of Education of 
 
 City and County of San Francisco v. Blake, 38 P. 536. 
 Memorandum of contract. Sufficiency of description. — Blythe v. Torre, 38 
 
 P. 639. 
 Notice. Sufficiency of description. — Willamette Steam Mill & Lumber Co. 
 
 V. Kremer, 24 P. 1026. 
 Notice to owner. — Russ Lumber -& Mill Co. v. Roggenkamp, 35 P. 643. 
 Personal liability of owner. — Gnekow v. Confer, 48 P. 331. 
 Pleading. Admission. — Lingard v. Beta Theta Pi Hall Ass'n, 56 P. 58. 
 Pleading and proof. Tender. — Jones v. Shuey, 40 P. 17. 
 , Pleadings and findings. Judgment. — Mooser v. Petersen, 33 P. 1086; Pe- 
 terson V. Shain, Id. 
 Proceedings to perfect — Kelly v. Lemberger, 46 P. 8. 
 Enforcement. — Webb v. Kuns, 54 P. 78. 
 Form and contents of claim. — Harmon v. San Francisco & S. R Co 
 
 22 P. 407. 
 Time for filing claim. — Roylance v. San Luis Hotel Co., 15 P. 777; 
 Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. Hege, 49 P. 69. 
 
INDEX. 
 
 47 
 
 MECHANICS' LIENS— Cont'd. 
 
 Property subject to lien. Mines and mining. — California Powder Works 
 
 V. Blue Tent Oonsol. Hydraulic Gold Mines of California, 22 P. 391. 
 Right to lien. Amount of recovery. — Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Oo. v. 
 
 Hege, 48 P. 69. 
 Time for filing. — Perry v. Brainerd, 8 P. 882; Schallert-Ganalil Lumber 
 
 Oo. V. Slieldon, 32 P. 235. 
 Time for filing claim. Completion of work. — Lippert v. Lasar, 33 P. 797. 
 Time of filing notice. Material men.— Santa Clara Val. Mill & Lumber 
 
 Co. V. Williams, 31 P. 1128. 
 Validity of bonds. Allowance of attorney's fees. — Stimson Mill Co. v. 
 
 Riley, 42 P. 1072. 
 
 MINES AND MINERALS. 
 
 Actions. Evidence. — Bennett v. Morris, 37 P. 929. 
 
 Contracts. Requisites. — Stanton v. Singleton, 54 P. 587. 
 
 Conveyances and contracts. Agreement to purchase. — David v. Eames, 35 
 
 P. 566. 
 Location claim. Notice. — Willeford v. Bell, 49 P. 6. 
 Tenants in common. Accounting. — Holbrooke v. Harrington, 36 P. 365: 
 
 MONEY RECEIVED. 
 
 Trial. Review. — Downing v. Mulcahy, 56 P. 4C6. 
 
 MORTGAGES. 
 
 Action to cancel. Review. — Wiebold v. Rauer, 33 P. 839. 
 
 Action to foreclose. Parties. — Ingham v. Weed, 48 P. 318. 
 
 Action to redeem. Findings. — Corcoran v. Hinkel, 34 P. 1031. 
 
 Breach of agreement by mortgagee. Consideration. — Heim v. Butin, 40 
 
 P. 39. 
 Construction. — Sainsevain v. Luce, 35 P. 1033. 
 Conversion by mortgagee. Rights of prior mortgagee. — Pette v. Lane, 37 
 
 P. 914. 
 Conversion of mortgaged chattels. Action by mortgagee. — ^Wetzel v. 
 
 Webb, 33 P. 1105. 
 Conveyance subject to mortgage. — Stewart v. Powers, 33 P. 489. 
 Deed absolute. Evidence. — Ross v. Brusie, 10 P. 121. 
 Deed as security for debt. Foreclosure. — Combs v. Hawes, 8 P. 597. 
 Deed construed as mortgage. Lien. — Combs v. Hawes, 8 P. 597. 
 Deficiency judgment in foreclosure. — Chapman v. Pennle, 39 P. 14. 
 Delivery. Vendor's lien. — Raymond v. Glover, 37 P. 772. 
 Description. Foreclosure. — Staples v. May, 23 P. 710. 
 Designation of instrument. Lien of mortgage. — Bank of Oroville v. Law- 
 rence, 37 P. 936. 
 Estoppel by mortgage deed. Warranty.— Trope v. Kerns, 20 P. 82. 
 Execution and delivery of notes. Absolute deed.— Arnot v. Baird, 12 P. 
 
 386. 
 Extension. — Southern Pac. Oo. v. Prosser, 52 P. 836. 
 
 Failure to pay interest. Election to declare principal due. — Foerst v. Ma- 
 sonic Hall Ass'n of South San Francisco, 31 P. 903. 
 Foreclosure. Attorney's fees.— Cooper v. McCarthy, 36 P. 2. 
 
 Maturity of debt. — Bullion & Exchange Bank v. Spooner, 36 P. 121. 
 Modification of judgment. — Gregory v. Keating, 22 P. 1084. 
 Pleading. Arnot v. Baird, 12 P. 386. 
 Foreclosure by action. Attorneys' fees. — Barnett v. Mulkins, 40 P. 115; 
 Lee V. McCarthy, 35 P. 1034; Ogden v. Packard, 35 P. 642; RaEEerty 
 V. High, 41 P. 489. 
 Defenses.— Benicla Agriculture Works v. Estes, 32 P. 938; Thatcher 
 
 V. Edsall, 4 P. 202. 
 Deficient judgment.— Flagg v. St. Elmo Inv. Co., 30 P. 579. 
 Disposition of proceeds.— Hewett v. Dean, 25 P. 753. 
 Enforcement of debt. — Levy v. Baldwin, 7 P. 683. 
 Fraud as a defense. — Levy v. Burkle, 14 P. 564. 
 Illegality of contract.— Daw v. Niles, 33 P. 1114. 
 Note due on default in interest. — Hewett v. Dean, 25 P. 753. 
 
48 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 MORTGAGES— Cont'd. 
 
 Pleading. — Pelller t. Gillespie, 4 P. 1137; Tulare Building & Loai* 
 
 Ass'n V. Coleman, 44 P. 793. • 
 
 Recovery of proceeds of void sale. — ^Patton v. Thomson, 32 P. 97. 
 Rights of purchasing mortgagee. — Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v^ Beck,. 
 
 35 P. 169. 
 Setting afeide of sale. — Haynes v. Bacliman, 31 P. 745. 
 Mortgage for purchase money. Validity. — Raymond v. Glover, 37 P. 
 
 772. 
 Mortgage or conditional sale. — Fletcher v. Northcross, 32 P. 328. 
 Notice of prior mortgage. Evidence and finding. — Pette v. Lane, 37 P. 
 
 914. 
 Order of sale. Right of redemption. — Levy v. Burkle, 14 P. 564. 
 Payment of taxes. Foreclosure by action. — Barnhart v. Edwards, 47 P.. 
 
 251. 
 Priority; Foreclosure. — ^Wilson V. California Bank, 54 P. 119. 
 Priority of lien. — Austin v. Pulschen, 89 P. 799. 
 Redemption. Pleading. — Allen v. Allen, 27 P. 30. 
 
 Proceedings on redemption. — Chielovich v. Krauss, 11 P. 781. 
 Rights and liabilities of parties. Accounting for rents and profits. — Mur- 
 
 dock V. Clark, 24 P. 272. 
 Special findings. Pleading. — Bank of Oroville v. Lawrence, 37 P. 936. 
 Tender after due. Effect of lien. — Chielovich v. Krauss, 9 P. 945. 
 Unlawful consideration. Evidence. — Benicia Agricultural Works v. Estes,. 
 
 32 P. 938. 
 Validity. Mortgageable interest. — Houghton v. Allen, 14 P. 641. 
 Waiver of redemption rights. Forfeiture to satisfy lien. — Corcoran v. Hin- 
 
 kel, 34 P. 1031. 
 What . constitutes. — San Jos6 Safe-Deposit Banl5 of Savipgs v. Bank of 
 Madera, 54 P. 270. 
 Deed absolute. — Pendergrass v. Burris, 19 P. 187. 
 Escrow.— McDonald v. Huff, 18 P. 243. 
 
 MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. 
 
 Abandonment of improvements. Limitations and laches.^Connolly v. City 
 
 and County of San Francisco, 33 P. 1109. 
 Appeal to council. Conclusiveness of decision. — ^Dowling v. Altschul, 33 
 
 P. 495. 
 Assessments. Pleading. — Ede v. Cuneo, 55 P. 388. 
 Bonds and other security and sinking funds. Limitation of actions. — Bates 
 
 V. Gregory, 22 P. 683. 
 Changing street grade. Damages. — De Long v. Warren, 36 P. 1009. 
 Contract for public work. Manner of payment. — McGee v. City of San 
 
 Jos6, 7 P. 189. 
 Contract for street work. Fixing time for completion. — Palmer v. Burn- 
 ham, 47 P. 599. 
 Contracts. Condition. — Hall v. County of Los Angeles, 13 P. 854. 
 
 Quantum meruit. Griflith County v. City of Los Angeles, 54 P. 383. 
 Contract ultra vires. Ordinances and resolutions. — Higgins v. City of Saa 
 
 Diego, 45 P. 824. 
 County ordinance. — Ex parte Cass, 13 P. 169. 
 Establishment. — People v. City of Riverside, 9 P. 662. 
 Pees for service of legal process. Liability of county. — Carlisle v. Tulare 
 
 County, 49 P. 3. 
 Injunction. Bvidence.^Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co., 38 
 
 P. 986. 
 Lien for street work. Foreclosure. — Santa Cruz Rock Pav. Co. v. Lyons, 
 
 43 P. 599. 
 Marshal. Service of legal process. Fees. Liability of county. — Carlisle- 
 
 V. Tulare County, 49 P. 3. 
 Municipal bonds. Form.^Murphy v. City of San Luis Obispo, 48 P. 974. 
 Municipal oflBcers in general. Liability on bonds. — Priet v. De La Mon- 
 
 tanya, 22 P. 171. 
 
INDEX. ^ 49 
 
 MUNIOIPAI/ COKPOBATIONS— Cont'cl. 
 
 Officers and agents. Election. — Drew v. Rogers, 34 P. 1081. 
 
 Ordinance. Injunction. — Southern Cal. Ry. Co. v. Southern Pac. R. Co., 
 
 43 P. 1123. 
 Ordinance or order for improvement. Condemnation proceedings. — City of 
 
 Los Angeles v. Waldron, 1 P. 883. 
 Police commissioners. Election. — People v. Alvord, 4 P. 676. 
 Protest against public improvement. Approval of mayor. — Clarke v. Jen- 
 nings, 32 P. 1049. 
 Public improvements. — Kahn v. Board of Sup'rs of City and County of San 
 Francisco, 25 P. 403. 
 Assessments. — Gill v. Dunham, 34 P. 68; Gray v. Richai'dson, .55 P. 
 
 603. 
 Assessments for benefits. — City of Stockton v. Dahl, 4 P. 369'; Dor- 
 land V. Bernal, Id. 1065; Milliken v. Houghton, Id. 914. 
 Assessments for benefits and special taxes.— La Societe Francaise 
 
 D'Epargne et de Prevoyance Mutuelle v. Fishel, 10 P. 395. 
 Certificate of surveyor.— Dowling v. Adams, 41 P. 413. 
 Contracts. — Fresno Milling Co. v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co., 36 P. 
 " 410; J. M. Griffith Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 54 P. 383; McGhee 
 V. City of San Jose, 7 P. 188; Owens v. Heydenfeldt, 6 P. 423; 
 Torrens v. Townsend, 6 P. 423. 
 Enforcement of assessments. — Byrne v. Luning Co., 38 P. 454; Wil- 
 liams V. Bisagno, 34 P. 640. 
 Enforcement of assessments and special taxes.— Mietzsch v. Berkhout, 
 
 35 P. 321. 
 Notice of intention.— Dyer v. Heydenfeldt, 4 P. 1187. 
 Petition.— City of Los Angeles v. Waldron, 1 P. 883. 
 Recommendation of street superintendent.— Dyer v. Heydenfeldt, 4 P. 
 
 1187. 
 Special assessments.— Manning v. Dere, 24 P. 1092. 
 Street assessment.— Dowling v. Altschul, 33 P. 495. 
 Street improvements. Contract payable by assessments. — Connolly v. City 
 
 and County of San Francisco, 33 P. 1109. 
 Street-paving contract. Provision for repairs by contractor. — Excelsior 
 Pav. Co. V. Pierce, 33 P. 727. 
 Repairs by contractor.— Excelsior Pav. Co. v. Leach, 34 P. 116. 
 Streets. Dedication for public use. — Spaulding v. Wesson, 45 P. 807. 
 Torts. Damages.— Bloom v. City and County of San Francisco, 3 P. 129. 
 
 Obstructions in streets.— People v. Jones, 37 P. 650. 
 Vacation of alley. Rights of abutting owner.— Bigelow v. Ballerino, 41 P. 
 
 14. 
 Validity of bonds. Submission to voters.— Murphy v. City of San Luis 
 
 Obispo, 48 P. 974. 
 Water companies. Rates.— Shaw v. San Diego Water Co., 50 P. 693. 
 
 N ' 
 
 NAVIGABLE WATERS. 
 
 Obstruction of navigable water. Injunction.— Crescent Mill & Transporta- 
 tion Co. V. Hayes, 8 P. 692. 
 
 NEGLIGENCE. 
 
 Actions for injuries. Independent contractors. — Colegrove v. Smith, 32 P. 
 
 115. 
 Contributory negligence. Proximate cause.— Brown v. Central Pac. R. Co., 
 12 P. 512; Williams v. Southern Pac. R. Co., 9 P. 152. 
 Questions for jury.— Johnson v. Thomas, 43 P. 578. 
 Dangerous premises. Pleading.— Malloy v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Soc, 
 
 21 P. 525. 
 Defective sidewalk. Liability of owner of building for.— Burke v. 
 
 Schwerdt, 6 P. 381. 
 Fast driving. Violation of city ordinance.— Johnson v. Thomas, 43 P. 578. 
 Setting out fires. Treble damages.— Galvin v. Gualala Mill Co., 33 P. 94. 
 CAL.OAS.— 4 
 
50 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 NEW TRIAL. 
 
 Action against bailee. Discretion of court.— Daggett v. Vanderslice, 13 P. 
 
 402. 
 Conflict of evidence.— Goodwin v. Bumey, 14 P. 676. 
 Grounds. Amendment of notice. — Packer v. Doray, 34 P. 628. 
 Basis of motion. — Harris v. Careaga, 2 P. 41. 
 
 Conflicting evidence.— Reynolds v. Scott, 4 P. 346; Shumway v. Lea- 
 key, 11 P. 839. 
 Cumulative evidence.— People v. Burdick, 29 P. 245. 
 Presumptions.— Renton v. Cannon, 9 P. 423. 
 Proceedings to procure new trial. Affirmance. — Silva v. Silva, 38 P. 
 
 105. 
 Verdict. Findings.— Haas v. Whittier, 21 P. 547. 
 Motion. Grounds.— Millan v. Hood, 30 P. 1107; Millard v. Supreme Coun- 
 cil America Legion of Honor, 21 P. 825; People v. Forrestier, 29 P. 646; 
 Townsend v. Briggs, 32 P. 307. 
 Newly-discovered evidence. — People v. Carty, 3 P. 609; Same v. Jones, 8 
 P. 611. 
 Discretion.— O'Conor v. Clarke, 44 P. 482. 
 Materiality.— Kelleher v. Kenny, 4 P. 10O5. 
 Misconduct of jury.— Weinburg v. Somps, 33 P. 341. 
 Notice. Tuffree v. Steins Ranches Co., 54 P. 826. 
 
 Appeal from order granting new trial.— Hook v. Hall, 6 P. 422. 
 Notice of motion.— Girdner v. Beswiek, 8 P. 11. 
 
 Pleading.— Haiglit v. Tryon, 34 P. 712. 
 Proceedings to procure new trial. Dismissal. — Descalso v. Duane, 33 P. 
 
 328. 
 Review. Discretion of court.— Doty v. Whittle, 11 P. 761. 
 Statement of the case. Error not specified.— Carter v. Allen, 4 P. 10©i. 
 Sufficiency of evidence. Discretion.— Kerr v. Kerr, 13 P. 654. 
 Sufficiency of motion.— Davis v. Lamb, 35 P. 306. 
 Sufficiency of statement.— Martin v. Vanderhoof, 7 P. 307. 
 Surprise. Affidavits.— Symons v. Bunnell, 20 P. 859. 
 Time for serving statement. Practice.— Desmond v. Fans, 33 P. 457. 
 Waiver of notice.— Girdner v. Beswlck, 8 P. 11. 
 
 NOVATION. 
 
 Limitations. Pleading.— Wolters v. Thomas, 32 P. 565. 
 
 NUISANCE. 
 
 Action to abate. — Conrad v. Arrowhead Hot Springs Hotel Co., 37 P. 388. 
 Liability of grantee. Notice.— Castle v. Smith, 36 P. 859. 
 Pleading. Waiver of demurrer.— Silva v. Spangler, 43 P. 617. 
 Prescriptive right. Surface waters.— Drew v. Hicks, 35 P. 563. 
 Presumptions. Trial.— Castle v. Smith, 36 P. 859. 
 Verdict and findings. Review.— Castle v. Smith, 36 P. 869. 
 
 
 
 OBSCENITY. 
 
 Indecent exposure. Indictment.— Ex parte Hutchings, 16 P. 234. 
 
 OFFICERS. 
 
 Abolition of office.— People v. Board of Election Com'rs, 3 P. 412; Same v. 
 Veuve, 3 P. 862. 
 
 Public officer. Refusal to pay over money to successor.— People v. Ham- 
 ilton, 32 P. 526. 
 
 Removal. — People v. Shear, 15 P. 92. 
 
 P 
 
 PARTIES. 
 
 Defendants.— People's Ditch Co. v. '76 Land & Water Co., 44 P. 176. 
 Intervention.— Chielovich v. Krauss, 11 P. 781. 
 Joinder.- Graham v. Franke, 38 P. 455. 
 
INDEX. 51 
 
 PARTIES— Cont'd. 
 
 Misjoinder of parties. Objections.— Moody v. Newmark, 50 P. 758. 
 Notice on appeal.— Porter v. Lassen County Land & Cattle Co., 55 P. 396. 
 Pleading.— Wilson v. Henderson, 55 P. 986. 
 
 PARTITION. 
 
 Action to set aside. Evidence.— Baker v. Baker, 31 P. 355. 
 
 Evidence.- Hardy v. Sexton, 5 P. 162. 
 
 Notice of appeal. Service.— Luco v. Commercial Bank of San Diego, 8 P. 
 
 274. 
 Real and personal property. Decree.— Woodward v. Raum, 31 P. 930. 
 Sale. Validity.— Gerke v. Cameron, 50 P. 434. 
 Tenants in common. Noce v. Daveggio, 4 P. 495. 
 
 PARTNEKSHIP. 
 
 Absence of partner, from state. Power of co-partner to sell or assign prop- 
 erty.— Bernheim V. Porter, 4 P. 446. 
 
 Accounting. Contracts.— Wallace v. Sisson, 33 P. 496. 
 Novation.— Chapin v. Brown, 34 P. 525. 
 
 Accounting and settlement. Surviving partner.— Painter v. Painter, 36 P. 
 865. 
 
 Action against several as partners. Recovery against one.— Morgan v. 
 Righetti, 45 P. 260. 
 
 Acts of individual partners. Liability of partnership.— Burt v. Collins, 3 
 
 , P. 128. 
 
 Administrator of deceased partner. Suit for accounting. — McKay v. Joy, 9 
 P. 940. 
 
 Agreement to carry on business. Construction.— Huntington v. Russell, 8 
 P. 511. 
 
 Assuming antecedent debts of members.— Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. 
 V. Taylor, 31 P. 1122. 
 
 Death of partner. Right of surviving partner.— McKay v. Joy, 9 P. 940. 
 
 Dissolution. Lien of commissioners. — Ex parte Corran, 41 P. 464. 
 
 Duties. Rescission of deed.— Wiester v. Wiester, 48 P. 1086. 
 
 Exclusion of evidence in suit for accounting. Presumptions on appeal. — 
 Harper v. Anderson, 37 P. 926. 
 
 Mutual rights and liabilities. Individual transactions.— Shain v. Du Jar- 
 din, 38 P. 529. 
 
 Proof of.— Sweeny v. Standford, 6 P. 688. 
 
 Purchases by partner.— Sanborn v. Cunningham, 33 P. 894. 
 
 Rights of individual partner. Estoppel.— Leedom v. Hall, 49 P. 222. 
 
 Suit for accounting. Parties. — Harper v. Anderson, 37 P. 926. 
 
 PARTY WALLS. 
 
 Enjoining use. Action for cost. — Banli of Escondido v. Thomas, 41 P. 462. 
 
 PATENTS. 
 
 Location. Opinion evidence.— Tognazzini v. Morganti, 23 P. 138. 
 
 PAYMENT. 
 
 Recovery of payments.— Lutz v. Rothschild, 38 P. 360. 
 
 PERJURY. 
 
 Prosecution and punishment. Evidence.— Ex parte Meyer, 40 P. 953. 
 
 PERPETUITIES. 
 
 Gifts to charities.— Spence v. Widney, 46 P. 463. 
 
 PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS. 
 
 Claims against decedent. License.— Roberts v. Levy, 31 P. 570. 
 Compensation. Expert testimony.- Heintz v. Cooper, 47 P. 3G0. 
 
 PLEADING. 
 
 Admissions. — Bourn v. Dowdell, 50 P. 695. 
 
 Allegations. Effect on person not party.— Melius v. Melius, 8 P. 1. 
 Amended and supplemental pleadings.— Pottkamp v. Buss, 46 P. 169. 
 Amendment— Spooner v. Cady, 36 P. 104; Wells v. Law, 38 P. 523. 
 
 Certiorari.- In re Marshall, 15 P. 772. 
 
 Changing cause of action.— Malone v. Johnson, 47 P. 579. 
 
52 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 PLEAD ING— Cont'd. 
 
 Amendment of complaint after demurrer.— Ridgway v. Bogan, 12 P. 343. 
 
 Answer. Duplicity.— Eppinger v. Kendrick, 44 P. 234. 
 
 Answer and cross complaint. Waiver of objections.— Harrison v. McCor- 
 
 mlck, 9 P. 114. 
 Complaint. Defects cured by answer.— Hegard v. California Ins. Co., 11 
 P. 594. 
 Misjoinder of causes of action.— Savings Bank of San Diego v. Fisher, 
 
 41 P. 490. 
 Sufficiency as against general demurrer.— Nevln v. Thompson, 35 P. 
 
 160. 
 Uncertainty.— Wise v. Hogan, 18 P. 784. 
 Cross complaint.— Hall v. Cole, 38 P. 894. 
 Defects. Alder by verdict. — Eegensberger v. Quinn, 39 P. 788. 
 Defenses in general. Sufficiency of plea or answer. — Shain v. Du Jardin, 
 
 38 P. 529. 
 Demurrer. — California Southern R. Co. v. Colton Land & Water Co., 2 
 
 P. 38. 
 Failure to deny execution of writing. — Petersen v. Taylor. 34 P. 724. 
 Findings as to matters not in issue. Amendment on appeal. — Perkins v. 
 
 West Coast Lumber Co., 38 P. 1118. 
 Presumptions. — McPherson v. San Joaquin County, 56 P. 802. 
 Proof and variance. — Ah Goon v. Tarpey, 7 P. 188. 
 Sufficiency of allegations. Amended pleadings.^Smith v. Ferries & C. H. 
 
 Ry. Co., 51 P. 710. 
 Sufficiency of complaint. — Ferguson v. McBean, 35 P. 559; Schultz v. Mc- 
 Lean, 25 P. 427. 
 Supplemental complaipt. Limitations and laches. — ^Brown 'v. Mann, 9 P. 
 
 545. 
 Variance. — Cocklns v. Cook, 41 P. 406. 
 
 Allegation and proof .—Butcher v. Vaca Val. & C. L. R. Co., 5 P. 359. 
 
 PLEDGES. 
 
 Guaranty. — Bourn v. Dowdell, 50 P. 695. 
 
 Substitute of collateral. Trial by court. — Castle v. Hickman, 41 P. 1036. 
 
 Waiver of lien. Pleadings. — Blxby v. Crafts, 53 P. 404. 
 
 What constitutes. Foreclosure. — Ormsby v. De Borra, 52 P. 499. 
 
 Written Instruments. Proof of execution. — Castle v. Hickman, 41 P. 1036. 
 
 PRACTICE. 
 
 Dismissal as to certain defendants. — ^Dyer v. Heydenfeldt, 4 P. 1187. 
 Dismissal for want of prosecution. — Pardy v. Montgomery, 18 P. 330. 
 Dismissal of plaintiff. — Thompson v. Spray, 4 P. 418. 
 Judgment. Findings. — Milllch v. Gutternich, 4 P. 411. 
 Right to contradict witness. — Milllch v. Gutternich. 4 P. 411. 
 Setting case for trial. — Thompson v. Spray, 4 P. 418. 
 Verdict. Issues. — ^West v. Girard, 4 P. 565. 
 
 PRINCIPAL AND AGENT. 
 
 Conversion and embezzlement. Demand. — Becker v. Feigenbaum. 45 P. 
 
 837. 
 Creation and existence. Revocation by death. — Frlnk v. Roe, 7 P. 481. 
 Declarations. Admissibility. — Durkee v. Central Pac. R. Co., 9 P. 99. 
 Estoppel of principal to deny power of agent. Guaranty. — Malic v. Fox, 
 
 33 P. 441. 
 Evidence. Declarations of alleged agent. — Santa Cruz Butchers' Union 
 
 V. I X L Lime Co., 46 P. 382. 
 Knowledge of agent. — Witter v. McCarthy Co., 43 P. 969. 
 Pleading. — Tustln Fruit Ass'n v. Earl Fruit Co., 53 P. 693. 
 Purchase of principal's land. Concealment. — Burke v. Bours, 26 P. 102. 
 Ratification. Laches. — Kendall v. Earl, 44 P. 791. 
 Real-estate agent. Action for commissions. — Mendenhall v. Rose, 33 P 
 
 884. 
 Revocation. Notice. — Stockton Ice Co. v. Argonaut Land & Development 
 
 Co., 56 P. 885. 
 
INDEX. 53 
 
 PRINCIPAL AND AGENT— Cont'd. 
 
 Rights and liabilities Inter sese.— RItchey t. McMlchael, 35 P. 151. 
 Sales. Consideration.— Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Central Electric 
 
 Ry., 55 P. 777. 
 Termination. Mutual rights, duties, and liabilities.— Wiley v. California 
 
 Hosiery Co., 32 P. 522. 
 Unauthorized act of agent. Ratification by principal.— Kraft v. Wilson, 37 
 
 P. 790. 
 Written contract. Evidence. — Mendenhall v. Rose, 33 P. 884. 
 PRINCIPAL AND SURETY. 
 
 Contribution. Insolvency. — Stone v. Hammell, 22 P. 203. 
 PROCESS. 
 
 Affidavit of service. — Pellier v. Gillespie, 4 P. 1137. 
 
 Service of summons by publication. Affidavit. — People v. Ray, 12 P. 161. 
 PROHIBITION. 
 
 Petition for writ. — Stoddard v. Superior Court of Stanislaus County, 40 P. 
 
 491; Von Schmidt v. Superior Court, 30 P. 804. 
 Proceedings to obtain writ. — Mancello v. Bellrude, 11 P. 501. 
 Procedure. Demurrer and answer. — Heilbron v. Campbell, 33 P. 1032. 
 Writ of assistance. — Childs v. Edmunds, 10 P. 130. 
 
 Writ of prohibition. Actions to recover realty. — Grangers' Banli of Cal- 
 ifornia V. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco, 33 P. 
 1095. 
 Appeal and error. — Town of Santa Monica v. Ecliert, 33 P. 880. 
 PUBLIC LANDS. 
 
 Action to quiet title. Pleading. — People v. City and County of San Fran- 
 cisco, 15 P. 747. 
 Bona fide claimants. — ^Wheelan v. Bricliell, 38 P. 85. 
 
 Certificate of purchase. Effect of issue before filing plat. — Gilson v. Robin- 
 son, 7 P. 428. 
 Conflicting patents. — De Guyer v. Banning, 25 P. 252. 
 Conflicting titles. Opinion of commissioner. — Carr v. Quigley, 16 P. 9. 
 Contest of right to purchase state lands. New trial after reversal on ap- 
 peal.— Jacobs V. Walker, 33 P. 90. 
 Decree and patent. Conflicting titles. — People v. City and County Of San 
 
 Francisco, 15 P. 747. 
 Disposal of lands of the states. Certificate as evidence of title. — Gilson 
 
 v. Robinson, 7 P. 428. 
 Grant of railroad right of way. — Southern Pac. Co. v. Meyer, 24 P. 1033. 
 Homestead. Pre-emption. — ^Bishop v. Glassen, 12 P. 258. 
 Inclosure. Color of title. — Los Angeles Farming & MiUlng Co. v. HofC, 
 
 33 P. 518. 
 Mexican grants. Description. Confirmation. — De Guyer v. Banning, 25 
 P. 252. 
 Validity. — Ohm v. City and County of San Francisco, 25 P. 155. 
 Patents. Grant sub judlce. — Carr v. Quigley, 16 P. 9. 
 Proceedings in land office. — Ohm v. City ahd County of San Francisco, 25 
 
 P. 155. 
 Right of possession. Abandonment. — Daubenbiss v. White, 31 P. 360. 
 Swamp lands. Actions for cancellation of patents. — People v. Jacob, 12 
 P. 222. 
 Alteration of record. — Swamp-Land Reclamation Dist. No. 407 v. Wil- 
 cox, 14 P. 843. 
 Application before segregation. — Marsh v. Hendy, 27 P. 647. 
 Application before survey. — Stevens v. Lovejoy, 27 P. 33. 
 Assessments. — Swamp-Land Reclamation Dist. No. 407 v. Wilcox, 14 
 
 P. 843. 
 Grants in aid of railroads. — Southern Pac. R. Co. v. McCuslier, 7 P. 
 
 123. 
 Oath of commissioners. — Swamp-Land Reclamation Dist. No. 407 v. 
 Wilcox, 14 P. 843. 
 Timber-culture entry. Equitable interest. — Cooper v. Wilder, 41 P. 26. 
 
54 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 QUIETING TITLE. 
 
 Actions. Complaint. — Statliam v. Dusy, 11 P. 606. 
 
 Complaint. Sufficiency. — Neale v. Bardue, 45 P. 853. 
 
 Contest between vendor and vendee. Form of decree. — Schaeffer v. Hof- 
 
 mann, 37 P. 932. 
 Description. Sufficiency. — Israel v. Collins, 31 P. 1126. 
 Evidence. — Frankish v. Smith, 19 P. 701. 
 
 Estoppel.— Gordon v. City of San Diego, 32 P. 885. 
 Findings by court. — Indefiniteness. — Sbarp v. Frank, 41 P. 860. 
 Findings not contradictory. Material issues covered.- — Whittle v. Doty, 12 
 
 P. 299. 
 Liens. Tender. — Tripp v. Duane, 13 P. 860. 
 Pleading. — Savings & Loan Soc. v. Burnett, 37 P. 180. 
 Possession. — Charlton v. Southern Pac. K. Co., 33 P. 1119. 
 Presumptions. Bona fide purchasers. — ^Bryan v. Tormey, 21 P. 725. 
 Proceedings and relief. — Hayford v. Wallace, 46 P. 293; Millett t. Lago- 
 
 marsino, 38 P. 308. 
 Sufficiency of findings. Pleading. — Ybarra v. Sylvany, 31 P. 1114. 
 
 QUO WARRANTO. 
 
 Burden of proof. — People v. Lowden, 8 P. 66. 
 
 Maintenance by attorney general. Estoppel. — People v. Lowden, 8 P. 66. 
 
 Pleading. Answer. — People v. Lowden, 8 P. 66. 
 
 Prior proceedings. Bar. — People v. Lowden, 8 P. 66, 
 
 RAILROADS. 
 
 Accidents at crossings. Actions for injuries. — ^Bygum r. Southern Pac. 
 
 Co., 36 P. 415. 
 Actions for personal Injuries. Contributory negligence. — Fogel v. San 
 
 Francisco & S. M. Ry. Co., 42 P. 565. 
 Action to forfeit grant. Breach of conditions. — ^Jones v. Los Angeles & P. 
 
 Ry. Co., 37 P. 656. 
 Conveyance of right of way. Construction and efCect. — McDonald v. 
 
 Southern California Ry. Co., 41 P. 812. 
 Fires. Damages. — Smyth v. Stockton & OopperapoUs R. Co., 4 P. 505. 
 Evidence. Instructions. — Butcher v. Vaca Val. & C. L. R. Co., 5 P. 
 359. 
 Injuries to Infants. Actions for injuries. — Maglinchey v. Southern Pac. 
 
 Co., 44 P. 1021. 
 Injuries to licensees in general. Actions for injuries. — Davey v. Southern 
 
 Pac. Co., 45 P. 170. 
 Injuries to passenger in collision. Evidence. — ^Yaeger v. Southern Cali- 
 fornia Ry. Co., 51 P. 190. 
 Injuries to trespassers. Negligence. — Williams v. Southern Pac. R. Co., 
 
 9 P. 152. 
 Negligence. Evidence. — Durkee v. Central Pac. R. Co., 9 P. 99. 
 
 Fences. — McCoy v. Southern Pac. Co., 26 P. 629. 
 Operation. Accidents to persons on track. — Noyes v. Southern Pac. R. 
 
 Co., 24 P. 927. 
 Trespassers. Contributory negligence. — ^Williams v. Southern Pac. R, Co., 
 
 11 P. 849. 
 
 RAPE. 
 
 Prosecution and punishment. Trial and review. — People v. Knight, 43 
 P. 6. 
 
 RECEIVERS. 
 
 Accounting and settlement. — Montgomery v. Merrill, 3 P. 123. 
 
 Action by receiver. Conversion of property. — ^Daggett v. Gray, 40 P. 959. 
 
INDEX. .55 
 
 RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS. 
 
 Defenses. Burden of proof. — People v. Bister, 3 P. 884. 
 
 Xrial. Instructions.— People v. Elster, 3 P. 884. 
 REFERENCE. 
 
 Referees and proceedings. — Steen v. Hendy, 38 P. 718. 
 
 Report and findings. — Harris v. Careaga, 2 P. 41. 
 REPLEVIN. 
 
 Answer. Sufficiency of denial.— Byxbee v. Dewey, 47 P. 52. 
 
 By receiver. Judgment.— Humphreys v. Hopkins, 20 P. 71.3. 
 
 Complaint— Masterson v. Clark, 41 P. 796. 
 
 Form of verdict. Judgment. — Holmberg v. Hendy, 10 P. 3&4. 
 
 Judgment Damages— Cain v. Cody, 29 P. 778. 
 
 Judgment in alternative.— Piiillips v. Sutlierland, 2 P. 32. 
 REVIEW. 
 
 Petition for review. Sufficiency of petition.— Merrick v. Superior Court for 
 City and County of San Francisco, 15 P. 47. 
 
 Writ of review.— Broder v. Superior Court of Mono County, 33 P. 630. 
 Petition or other application.— Brandon v. Superior Court 11 P. 128. 
 ROBBERY. 
 
 Conviction. Sufficiency of evidence.— People v. McDonald, 45 P. 1005. 
 
 Evidence. Review.— People v. Gonzales, 56 P. 804. 
 
 Evidence of accomplice. Corroboration.- People v. Larsen, 34 P. 514. 
 
 Information. Variance.— People v. Gonzales, 56 P. 804. 
 
 Trial. Evidence.— People v. Cappola, 56 P. 248. 
 
 SALES. 
 
 Action for price. Construction of contract.— Thresher v. Gregory, 42 P. 
 
 421. 
 Breach of warranty. Damages.— Silberhom Co. v. Wheaton, 51 P. 689. 
 Contract. Repudiation by the purchaser.— Numsen v. Levi, 36 P. 657. 
 Delivery.— Lilienthal v. Ballon, 55 P. 251. 
 
 Attaching creditors.— Cook v. Rochford, 12 P. 568. 
 Change of possession. — Asbill v. Standley, 31 P. 738; Dorman v. Soto, 
 36 P. 588; Harter v. Donahoe, 9 P. 651. 
 Delivery as against creditors.— Young v. Poole, 13 P. 492. 
 Remedies of buyer in actions for breach of warranty. Review.— SUber- 
 
 horn Co. v. Wheaton, 51 P. 689. 
 Remedies of seller. Actions for price. Fictitious firm name. Effect.- 
 
 Shaln V. Du Jardin, 38 P. 529. 
 Rescission of sale. Delay in returning goods. — WlUard v. Tatum, 31 P. 
 
 912. 
 Validity. Action for price.- Gray v. Long, 37 P. 380. 
 
 Change of possession.— Byxbee v. Dewey, 47 P. 52. 
 Warranty.— Bowers Rubber Co. v. Blasdel, 47 P. 931. 
 
 Remedies of buyer.— First Nat Bank v. Hughes, 46 P. 272. 
 
 SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS. 
 
 Board of education. Employment of teachers.— Barry v. Goad, 24 P. 1023. 
 
 SET-OFF AND COUNTERCLAIM. 
 
 Estoppel to plead.— Randol v. Rowe, 44 P. 1068. 
 
 Failure to plead. Limitations.— Perkins v. West Coast Lumber Co., 48 P. 
 
 982. • ' 
 Sufficiency of plea. Evidence.— Valley Lumber Co. v. Wood, 33 P. 343. 
 
 SHERIFFS AND CONSTABLES. 
 
 Fees and compensation.— Fleckenstein v. Placer County, 37 P. 931; John- 
 ston V. Los Angeles County, 47 P. 374; Orr v. Kern County, 37 P. 
 649. 
 Mileage fees. — Monahan v. San Diego County, 29 P. 417. 
 
56 CAIJFOENIA CASES. 
 
 SHERIFFS AND CONSTABLES— Cont'd. 
 
 Sheriff's sale. Wtien set aside.— Georgeson v. Consumers' Lumber Co., 31 
 P. 257, 
 
 SHIPPING. ' 
 
 Carriage of goods. Delivery by vessel.— Blanchard v. Pacific Bolling-MlU 
 Co., 36 P. 584. 
 Deviation or delay.— Blanchard v. Pacific Kolling-Mlll Co., 36 P. 584. 
 
 SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. 
 
 Complaint. — Alpers v. Knight, 8 P. 446. 
 
 Conditions precedent. Review.— Monterey County v. Seegleken, 36 P. 515. 
 
 Contract for sale of land. — Alpers v. Knight, 8 P. 446. 
 
 Parol contract relating to land. Part performance.— Eshelman v. Hen- 
 rietta Vineyard Co., 36 P. 775; Same v. Malter, Id.; Henrietta Vine- 
 yard Co. V. Eshelman, Id. 
 
 Proceedings and reUef. Tender. — Stanton v. Singleton, 54 P. 587. 
 
 Transfer of stock. Sale of pledged stock.— Krouse v. Woodward, 42 P. 
 1084. 
 
 What constitutes. Laches.— Eshelman v. Henrietta Vineyard Co., 36 P. 755. 
 
 STATES. 
 
 Actions against state. Constitutional and statutory provisions.- Hoagland 
 V. State, 22 P. 142. 
 
 Appropriation by legislature.— Powers and duties of state comptroller.— 
 Oahili V. Colgan, 31 P. 614. 
 
 Board of examiners. Power to appoint.— Lewis v. Colgan, 44 P. 1081. 
 
 Claims against the state. Approval by board of examiners.— Cahill v. Col- 
 gan, 31 P. 614. 
 
 Government and officers. Board of examiners.— Sawyer v. Colgan, 33 P. 
 911. 
 
 State comptroller. Issuance of warrants on treasurer.- Sawyer v. Colgan, 
 33 P. 911. 
 
 State harbor commissioners. Contracts.;— Union Transp. Co. v. Bassett, 46 
 P. 907. 
 
 STATUTES. 
 
 Legislature. Procedure. — People v. Thompson, 7 P. 142. 
 Operation. Special laws.— In re Stanford's Estate, 54 P. 259. 
 
 STREET RAILROADS. 
 
 Actions for injuries. Evidence. Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated St. R. 
 
 Co., 42 P. 822. 
 Franchises. Forfeiture. — Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co., 38 
 
 P. 972. 
 Injury to passengers. — Perry v. Malarin, 40 P. 489. 
 
 Alighting from car in motion.— Tobin v. Omnibus Cable Co., 34 P. 124. 
 
 TAXATION. 
 
 Assessment. — Bowman v. Dewey, 8 P. 613. 
 
 Contesting assessment. Failure to furnish statement.— City of San Fran- 
 cisco- V. Low, 8 P. 600. 
 
 Corporations and corporate property. Savings bank. — Main St. Sav. Bank 
 & Trust Co. V. Hinton, 32 P. 6. 
 
 Equalization. Writ of review.— Security Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Board 
 of Sup'rs of Los Angeles County, 34 P. 437; Main St. .Sav. Bank & 
 Trust Co. V. Same, Id. 
 
 Inheritance tax. — Kerry v. Pacific Marine Supply Co., 54 P. 262. 
 
 Notice to redeem. Validity of redemption.— San Francisco & Fresno Land 
 Co. V. Banbury, 37 P. 801. 
 
 Power to tax. Taxation for void debt. — Miller v. Dunn, 11 P. 604. 
 
 Railroad companies. Double taxation.— Pacific Coast Ry. Co. v. Ramage, 
 37 P. 532. 
 
INDEX. 57 
 
 TAXATION— Cont'd. 
 
 Taxable property. Mortgage to state.— Smith y. Keagle, 20 P. 152. 
 
 Seat in stock exchange.— City and County of San Francisco v. Wan- 
 genheim, 37 P. 221. 
 Tax sale. Purchase by state.— San Francisco & Fresno Land Co. v. Ban- 
 bury, 37 P. 801. 
 
 TELEGfRAPHS AND TELEPHONES. 
 
 Limitation of liability.— Hart v. Western Union Tel. Co., 4 P. 657. 
 Negligence. Presumption.— Hart v. Western Union Tel. Co., 4 P. 657. 
 
 TENANCY IN COMMON. 
 
 Adverse possession.— Tully v. Tully, 9 P. 841. 
 
 TOWAGE. 
 
 Sufficiency of findings.— Boyd v. Slaybacli, 5 P. 161. 
 
 TEADE-MARKS AND TRADE-NAMES. 
 
 Actions. Temporary injunction.— Millbrae Co. v. Taylor, 37 P. 235. 
 Infringement- Schmidt v. McBwen, 35 P. 854; Same v. Steinke, Id. 855. 
 Damages.— Schmidt v. Haake, 35 P. 855; Same v. Liberty Soda-Works 
 
 Co., Id. 856; Same v. Welch, Id. 626. 
 Review.— Mclntyre v. Southern California Motor Road Co., 35 P. 991. 
 
 TRESPASS. 
 
 Acts constituting trespass and liability therefor.— Martin v. Jacobs, 3 P. 
 
 122. 
 Pleading. Damages.— Razzo v. Varni, 21 P. 762. 
 Right of action and defenses. — Stufflebeem v. Hickman, 53 P. 438. 
 Title to maintain. Defenses. — Odd Fellows' Sav. Bank v. Turman, 30 P.. 
 
 966. 
 Trespass on real property. Admissibility of evidence. — Faber v. Cathrin, 
 
 2 P. 879. 
 
 TKIAL. 
 
 Amendment of pleadings. Form of action. — ^Link v. Jarvis, 33 P. 206. 
 By court. Findings. — Luco v. Toro, 18 P. 866; Ricks v. Lindsay, 31 P. 
 262. 
 Reception of evidence. — Tripp v. Duane, 13 P. 860. 
 Conduct of counsel. Verdict.' — Fogel v. San Francisco & S. M. Ry. Co.,. 
 
 42 P. 565. 
 Continuance. Absence of parties. — Light v. Richardson. 31 P. 1123. 
 Absence of party's attorney. — Boehm v. Gibson, 35 P. 1014. 
 Judgment— Gainsley v. Gainsley, 44 P. 456. 
 Contradictory instructions. — Agnew v. Kimball, 9 P. 91. 
 Failure to make findings. — Bailiff v. Powers, 37 P. 508. 
 Findings. Sufficiency of evidence. — Bank of Orland v. Finnell, 56 P. 607.. 
 Instructions.— Kahn v. Brilliant, 35 P. 309. 
 
 Examination of witnesses. — Weinburg v. Somps, 33 P. 341. 
 Rule of trial court. Discretion of court. — Chieloiijch v. Krauss, 9 P. 945. 
 Separate statement of facts. Conclusions of law. — Gainsley v. Gainsley, 
 
 44 P. 456. 
 Subpoena duces tecum. Contempt. — Jaynes v. Superior Court of San Fran- 
 cisco, 12 P. 117. 
 Sufficiency of findings. Judgment. — Stover v. Baker, 21 P. 428. 
 Terdict. Findings, sufficiency of. — ^Brown v. Mann, 9 P. 545. 
 
 Omission to make special findings. — Brown v. Central Pac. R. Co., 12^ 
 
 P. 512. 
 Special findings. — Trope v. Kerns, 20 P. 82. 
 Specifying amount of recovery. — Electric Imp. Co. v. San Jos6 & S. C. 
 
 E. Co., 31 P. 455. ' 
 
 Sufficiency of evidence. — Asbill v. Standley, 31 P. 738. 
 
 TROVER AND CONVERSION. 
 
 Actions. Evidence. — Darden v. Callaghan, 31 P. 263; Tower v. Mc- 
 Dowell, 31 P. 843. 
 
58 
 
 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 TRUSTS. 
 
 Action for trust fund. Findings. — Spencer v. Duncan, 40 P. 549. 
 
 Sufficiency of evidence. — Petersen v. Taylor, 33 P. 436. , 
 Action to determine property rights. Trust deed. — Reynolds v. Weston, 4 
 
 P. 374. 
 Appointment. Management of property. — Spence v. Widney, 46 P. 463. 
 Charging trust estate. Lflmitations and laches. — ^Burling v. Newlands, 39 
 
 P. 49. 
 Coupled with an interest. Conveyance by trustee. — Tripp v. Duane, 13 P. 
 
 S60. 
 Establishment and enforcement of trusts. Actions. — Tuffree v. Brock, 31 
 
 P. 1134. 
 Express trust. Declaration in writing. — Baker v. Baker, 31 P. 355. 
 Limitations and laches. — Mallagh v. Mallagh, 16 P. 535. 
 Payment by trustee after death of cestui que trust. Declarations. — Bedell 
 
 V. Scoggins, 40 P. 954. 
 Pleading. Resulting trusts. Rescission. — Schultz v. McLean, 25 P. 427. 
 Ratification by beneficiaries. — Witter v. McCarthy Co., 43 P. 969. 
 Resulting trusts. Establishment by parol.— Mallagh t. Mallagh, 16 P. 535. 
 
 Evidence. — Hunt v. Swyney, 33 P. 854. 
 Sale by trustees. Title of purchaser. — Savings & Loan Soc. v. Burnett, 
 
 37 P. 180. 
 Trust deed. Security for future advances. Sale by trustees. Title of 
 
 purchaser. Quieting title. Pleading. — Savings & Loan Soc. v. Burnett, 
 
 37 P. 180. 
 
 VENDOR AND PURCHASER. 
 
 Authority of agent. — Foulke v. De Witt, 52 P. 476. 
 
 Construction of contract. Default bv purchased — Freeman v. Griswold, 
 34 P. 327. 
 Disaffirmance by buyer. — Herberger v. Husmann, 24 P. 1058. 
 Contract. Consideration! — Ward v. Yorba, 54 P. 80. 
 Delivery of deed. — McDonald v. Huff, 18 P. 243. 
 Failure to convey. — Vorwerk v. Nolte, 24 P. 840. 
 Contract for sale of land. Rights of seller. — Gates v. McLean, 9 P. 938 
 Contract of sale. Merchantable quality of goods. — Marshall v. Keefe, 34 
 
 P. 89. 
 Contract to convey land. Determination of rights of parties. — Southern 
 
 Pac. R. Co. v. Allen, 40 P. 752. 
 Deed subject to lease. — Garber v. Giannella, 30 P. 841. 
 Notice of equities. Whitmore v. Ainsworth, 38 P. 196. 
 Performance of contract. — Royal v. Dennison, 38 P. 39. 
 Rescission. Recovery of money paid. — ^Alkman v. Sanborn, 52 P. 729. 
 Rescission by vendor. Tender of amount of damages sustained by breach. 
 
 —Green v. Barney, 36 P. 1026. 
 Rescission of contract. Performance. — Quill v. Jacoby, 37 P. 524. 
 Sale of land. Description. — Gwin v. Sweetser, 30 P. 778. 
 
 Rescission. — Cleary v. Folger, 33 P. 877. 
 Sufficiency of title. Recovery of money paid. — Bartlett v. McGee, 45 P. 
 
 1029. 
 Vendor's lien. Action to foreclose. — Greenberg v. California Bituminous 
 Bock Co., 33 P. 192. 
 Priorities. — Kuschel v. Hunter, 50 P. 397. 
 Waiver. — Austin v. Pulschen, 42 P. 306. 
 
 VENUE. 
 
 Change of venue. — Daniels v. Gualala Mill Co., 6 P. 315. 
 Affidavits of merit. — Johnson v. WaJden, 12 P. 257. 
 Grounds In general. — ^Lux v. Haggin, 13 P. 654; Remy v. Olds, 42 P. 
 
 239; Usher y. Usher, 36 P. 8. 
 Review. — Conlon v. Gardner, 32 P. 505. 
 
INDEX. 69 
 
 VENUE— Cont'd. 
 
 Sufficiency of application.— Haas v. Mutual Relief Ass'n of Petaluma, 
 42 P. 237. 
 Joinder of personal and local actions. — Wliite v. Adler, 42 P. 1070. 
 Nature of action. Domicile or residence of parties.- Smitii v. Smith, 38 
 P. 43. 
 
 w 
 
 WATERS AND WATER COURSES. 
 
 Actions. Evidence. Contract of agent. Finding of jury.— CafErey v. 
 
 Omilak Gold & Silver Min. Co., 36 P. 388. 
 Appropriation and prescription. Evidence. Findings. — Lux v. Haggin, 4 
 
 P. 919. ■ 
 
 ArtiOcial channels. Damages. — Keller v. Fink, 37 P. 411. 
 Canal. Liability of state. — Green v. State, 12 P. 683. 
 Consideration license. Adverse possession. — ^Jensen v. Hunter, 41 P. 14. 
 Contract of agent. Verdict and andings.— Oaffrey v. Omilak Gold & Silver 
 
 Min. Co., 36 P. 388. 
 Contracts. Trial. — Fairbanks v. Rollins. 54 P. 79. 
 Conveyances. Construction. — Smitii v. Williams, 55 P. 600. 
 Diversion.— Bennett v. Morris, 37 P. 929. 
 Actions. — Evans v. Ross, 8 P. 88. 
 Contract. — Jensen v. Hunter, 41 P. 14. 
 Eminent domain. Taking land for public use.-^Green v. State, 12 P. 683. 
 Irrigating ditch. Injunctjon. — Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. Richard- 
 son, 12 P. 343. 
 Irrigation. Incorporated districts. — Decker v. Perry, 35 P. 1017. 
 Levee. Damage to property. — Montgomery v. Locke, 11 P. 874. 
 Negligence of water company in repairing dam. — Weidekind v. Tuolumne 
 
 County Water Co., 12 P. 387. 
 Rights. User. — Lux v. Haggin, 4 P. 919. 
 
 Riparian rights in general. Actions to determine and establish right. — 
 Lytle Creek Water Co. v. Perdev?-, 2 P. 732. 
 Adverse possession. — Evans v. Ross, 8 P. 88. 
 Diversion. Jurisdiction. — Evans v. Ross, 8 P. 88. 
 Prior appropriators. — Judkins v. Elliott, 12 P. 116. 
 Reasonable use of water. — Lux v. Haggin, 4 P. 919. 
 Rising in bog. Draining. — Bartlett v. O'Connor, 36 P. 513. 
 State grant. — Lux v. Haggin, 4 P. 919. 
 Surface water. Obstruction. — Drew v. Cole, 32 P. 229. 
 
 Obstruction or repulsion of flow. — McDaniel v. Cummings, 22 P. 216. 
 Water rights. Waste. — Barrows v. Fox, 30 P. 768. 
 
 WHARVES. 
 
 Wharfage charges. Constitutional and statutory provisions. — People v. 
 Roberts, 25 P. 496. 
 
 WILL. 
 
 Action to construe. Jurisdiction of superior court. — Goldtree v. Thompson, 
 
 15 P. 359. 
 Attestation of witnesses. Presumptions. — In re Tyler's Estate, 50 P. 927. 
 Construction. Acknowledgment. — In re Willey's Estate, 56 P. 550. 
 
 Decree of distribution. — Goldtree v. Thompson, 20 P. 414. 
 
 Distribution. — In re Berton's Estate, 31 P. 576. 
 
 Payment of mortgage on devised land. — Appeal of Hellings, 39 P. 788. ' 
 Contest. Actions.— Clements v. McGinn, .33 P. 920. 
 
 Mental capacity. — Clements v. McGinn, 33 P. 920. 
 Foreign probate. Collateral attack. — Goldtree v. McAllister, 23 P. 207. 
 Grounds of contest. — In re Tillman's Estate, 31 P. 563; Appeal of Peneb- 
 sky, Id. 
 
 Conveyance of property. — In re Tillman's Estate, 31 P. 563. 
 Interests created. Validity. — In re Willey's Estate, 56 P. 550. 
 Omitted children. Power of sale.— Smith v. Olmstead, 22 P. 1143. 
 
(50 CALIFORNIA CASES. 
 
 WILL— Cont'd. 
 
 Operation and effect.— In re Smith's Estate, 38 P. 950. 
 Testamentary capacity.- — Kenney v. Parks, o-l P. 251. 
 
 WITNESSES. 
 
 Credibility. Cross-examination. — People v. Bowers, 18 P. 660. 
 
 Weight of testimony.— Brown v. Griffith, 9 P. 425. 
 Examination. — Grant v. Dreyfus, 52 P. 1074; People v. McSweeney, 38 
 P. 743; Pottkamp v. Buss, 46 P. 169; Smith v. Williams, 55 P. 600. 
 Impeachment. — People v. Dillwood, 39 P. 438. 
 Examination of defendant.^ — People v. Carleton, 4 P. 763. 
 Husband and wife. — Fitzgerald v. Livermore. 13 P. 167. 
 Impeachment.— Hite v. Hite, 55 P. 900. 
 
 WORK AND LABOR. 
 
 Pleadings. Findings. — Webb v. Kuns, 54 P. 78. 
 
 Services of architects. Evidence of value. — Layer v. Hotaling, 46 P. 1070. 
 
Did you ever think^-^ 
 
 Of the advantage which the subscriber to the Na- 
 tional Reporter System has over the owner of the 
 State Reports in this single respect: 
 
 Cases cited from the State Reports 
 can be readily found in the Reporters 
 
 By means of Third Label 
 Tables and other devices. 
 l^HILE 
 
 Cases cited from the Reporters cannot 
 be readily found in the State Reports, 
 
 Because no similar devices 
 for cross-reference are pub- 
 lished for the Reports, 
 
 Again- .^ 
 
 The Reporters contain all the 
 cases in the State Reports, 
 
 Giving every opinion in 
 full 
 
 ly^ilLE 
 
 The State Reports do not contain 
 all the cases in the Reporters. 
 
 The System contains more 
 than 10, 000 of these omit- 
 ted cases already. 
 
 Therefore: The Reporters are substitutes for the State Reports. 
 The State Reports are NOT substitutes for the Re- 
 porters. 
 
 N. B. Some 250,000 Cases, or AbOUt One=Half 
 
 ...of the Entire Case Law 
 
 Of the country, are contained in the National Reporter 
 
Oi/stematic Unofficial ^eporti'nff 
 
 and 
 
 unsystematic Off/aa/ S^epori/nff. 
 
 The Reporters were pioneers in the matter of prompt, complete, 
 and inexpensive reporting. This everyone admits. But it was at 
 first generally assumed that the State Reports must in some way havte 
 a weight which the Reporters lacked, and this view is still fostered by 
 those whose interests lie in having it prevail. It is therefore not out 
 of' place to remind Reporter subscribers of the following facts: 
 
 As to the weight of the word "official." The official 
 part of a volume of reports is the utterances of the judges. 
 That is what is authoritative. That is the only part that 
 can be cited as a precedent. If the reporter who prepares ,. 
 the volume for publication misstates the law in his sylla- 
 bus, the reader may be misled, but no one is bound by this 
 • mistake. It is clerical in character. No reporter's work 
 is official in the sense of being authoritative. An "official 
 reporter" is simply one who has been officially appointed; 
 but it has also been officially declared, by legislation and by 
 judicial interpretation, that the publication of the decisions 
 of the courts must be open to all, in the interests of public 
 policy. Every publication of such decisions is therefore offi- 
 eiaJ. It may be simply stated as follows: The official 
 work of the courts is published in the National Reporter 
 System, under the official authority given to all publishers. 
 The "copy" is furnished in certified form by the officials of 
 the court, — generally by the same clerk who supplies the 
 court reporter with his copy. The plan (originated by the 
 publishers of the National Reporter System) of publishing 
 two editions enables the judges to first read the earliest 
 published report of their opinions in the advance sheets, and 
 to note any corrections or alterations which may be de^ 
 sired for the permanent, bound edition. These features 
 combine to make the reports in the Reporter System as 
 authoritative as any rei>orts can be. The "official reporter" 
 draws a salary from the public treasury, but his work is 
 C2234-6 (*^2) 
 
not otherwise on any different footing from that of any 
 other reporter of the same official opinions, and the com- 
 mon idea that an "official report" must, because of its name, 
 possess some virtue which compensates for dilatoriness and 
 high price, is due simply to a misconception as to which 
 part of the report is offlciaL 
 
 The result which has been achieved in the comparatively 
 few yeai-s during which the Reporter System has been be- 
 fore the profession is in itself as strong an argument in its 
 favor as any based upon a direct examination. Being un- 
 sttbsidized, it must depend entirely upon the support of the 
 profession for its continuance, and that support must be 
 conquered against the prejudice which always, with a con- 
 servative profession, operates against anything new and het- 
 erodox. Furthermore, the competition of older publishers, 
 whose "Reports" were threatened by these new "Reporters," 
 has been of the keenest. Appeals have been made to the 
 professional prejudice in favor of a past order of things", 
 and the very fact that the Reporters were so much cheaper 
 has been turned against them in arguments addressed to 
 the lawyers who were to do the paying. Yet in spite of 
 argument, competition, prejudice, and lack of any state sup- 
 port, the Reporter System is to-day used by lawyers all 
 over the country, is cited in judicial opinions generally, 
 and is so generally to be found in both public and private 
 libraries that a new text-book which does not give the Re- 
 porter citations is acknowledged to be at a great disad- 
 vantage. The way in which subscribers look at the system 
 is indicated by the letters collected in the pamphlet, "Ovct 
 Their Own Signatures." 
 
 This position could not have been attained without some- 
 thing in the Reporters themselves which exactly met the 
 wants of the profession. It is not their low price alone, 
 for among subscribers are lawyers to whom the price they 
 pay for a needed tool is the secondary consideration. It is 
 rather that low price, promptness of publication, systematic 
 method and completeness, and uniform excellence have all 
 combined to make the National Reporter System the most 
 serviceable aid which has ever been devised for the lawyer 
 in dealing with the case-law problem. It has been a grad- 
 ual growth, with nothing forced, spasmodic, or unnatural 
 in its development. It has resulted in a great and prospei^ 
 ous institution, devoted to the service of the legal profes- 
 sion, the permanent excellence of which is guarantied by the 
 fact that its continuance depends solely on its own merits. 
 
 WEST PUBLISHING CO., St. Paul, Minn. 
 
 €3234-7 (63) 
 
You are JVIaetcr of the 
 
 Situation. 
 
 A Single Case, .£. 
 
 All the Decisions of your own and the 
 neighboring states, 
 
 All the Decisions of the Country, 
 
 A current Bimonthly Digest of all the 
 decisions in pamphlet form, 
 
 A current bound Digest, 
 
 A complete Digest of all reported Amer- 
 ican case-law from the beginning, 
 
 You can get what you want through the National 
 Reporter System and the American Digest System. 
 
 YOU DECIDE WHAT YOU WANT, AND 
 YOU PAY FOR WHAT YOU GET,— AND 
 A LITTLE MONEY GOES A LONG WAY. 
 
 WEST PUBLISHING CO., St. Paul, Minn. 
 
 C2879 (04) 
 
2{//iat a sei of the 
 
 SPaciY/c Reporter ^wos the 
 California Juawj/er, 
 
 As to California Reports. 
 
 Vols. 1 to 60, Pacific Rerx>rter, give all the cases in vols. 64 to 128 
 California Reports. In other words, they give the equivalent of the 
 latest 65 volumes; that is, more than half of the complete set of State 
 Reports. 
 
 Looking at the number of cases, instead of the number of volumes, 
 we find that vols. 1 to 60, P qiflc, contain 8,568 Gal. cases. The 63 vol- 
 umes of California Reports prior to the Pacific contain 8,063 cases. A 
 set of the Pacific, therefore, gives over 50^ of all California Supreme 
 Court cases. 
 
 Looking at the present value of these cases, we find that of the 
 California decisions cited by the California court, as shown by the 
 three latest volumes, 69^ are cases included in the Pacific Reporter. 
 
 In addition to the California cases which are also accessible through 
 the state reports, the Pacific contains 1,864 cases (as listed in this 
 index) which have been omitted from the official reports. 
 
 Special front tables enable the subscriber to give the official cita- 
 tion for every decision in the set of Pacific Reporter which has been 
 reported in the official reports, and skeleton cross-reference tables 
 show where to find, in the Pacific, any authority cited from the Cali- 
 fornia Reports by page and volume only, without the title of the case. 
 
 As to Other Reports. 
 
 Buying vols. 1 to 60 of the Pacific, you secure, in addition to tiie 
 California matter, a complete substitute for the following 198 volumes 
 of state reports: 
 
 Vols. 1-7 Arizona. Vols. 3-9 New Mexico. 
 
 7-26 Colorado. 1-8 Oklahoma. 
 
 1-13 Colorado App. 11-33 Oregon. 
 
 2-4 Idaho. 3-19 Utah. 
 
 30-61 Kansas. 1-21 Wash. St, 
 
 1-11 Kansas App. 2-3 Wash. Ter. 
 
 4-22 Montana. 3-7 Wyoming. 
 17-24 Nevada. 
 
 C3047-2 
 

 /The 
 / Law As 
 ^ It Is. 
 
 e\