RA e.4 3 SiSS THE CONTROL COMMUNICABLE DISEASES SOUTH AUSTRALIA. W. RAMSAY SMITH, M.D., D.Sc.. F.R.S. (Edin.), \ Permanent Head of the Department of Public Health of South Australia;, Fellow of the Royal Institute of PuSlic Health of Great Britain; Chairman of the Board of Examiners for South Australia of the Royal Sanitary Institute ; Member of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States, S'c. THIBD EDITION. B. E. E. R0GEK8, GOVERNMENT PBJNTEK, NOSTfl TEER4CE. 1919. Ncuj fork ^ttAt (^allege of Agricultutc At ajorneU Iniucraits atl)aca. £7. %. 3Cibrarg With Compliments FROM The Board of Governors OF THE Public Library, Museum, & Art Gallery of South Au^ralia. Adki,aidk, South Australia. THE CONTROL COMMUNICABLE DISEASES SOUTH AUSTRALIA. W- RAMSAY SMITH, M.D., D.Sc. F.R.S. (Edin.), Permanent Head of the Department of Public Health of South Australia ; Fellow of the Royal Institute of Public Health of Great Britain ; Chairman of the Board of Examiners for South Australia of the Royal Sanitary Institute ; Member of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States, &rc. THIBD EDITION. R E. E. ROGERS GOVERNMENT PRINTER, NORTH TERRACE. 1919. The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924080085065 PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION. THE first edition of this pamphlet was written in 1909, in accordance with a resolution of the Central Board of Health that I should prepare a statement about modern methods of isolating- cases of infectious diseases, and in response to a request of the Director of Ediication that some instructions regarding communicable diseases should be available for thd use of public school teachers in the State. The health and well-being of school children had then come to be recognised as prime considerations in any system of education. The present edition has been carefully reivised. A chapter on influeiiza has been substituted for the chapter on plague in the former editions. The statistical and administrative information has been brought up to date, and the experience of the past ten years has been used as a guide for future action. I gratefiiUy acknowledge my special obligations to many American sources of information, including opportunities afforded me for personal observations in the States and Philippines, and the numerous Federal and States publica- tions regularly received. The lessons these have taught prove very helpful here, where so many conditions are similar. CONTENTS. PAQE. "Recent Knowledge about Communicable Diseases . . . . 5 ■General Characters of Communicable Diseases . . . . 7 Measures Necessary to Control Communicable Diseases . . 11 Legal Aspects of Control . . . . . . . . . . 13 Local Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . • • 1 5 A Model Lesson in Health Administration . . . , . . 22 Present Position in South Australia . . . . ..26 Control of Various Communicable Diseases .... . . 27 Whooping Cough . . .. .. .. .. .. ..30 Measles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Scarlet Fever . . . . . . . . . . . . ■44- Diphtheria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^9 "Contact Diseases" or " School Diseases".. .. ..S3 Typhoid Fever . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Influenza . . . . . . . . , . . . 65 Consumption.. .. '^.. .. .. .. .. yi The Sick Room and Disinfection .. .. .. .. .. 8f COMMUNICABLE DISEASES. Recent Knowledge about Communicable Diseases. In 1870 an observant physician, writing of smallpox, chicken- pox, scarlet fever, measles, and some similar diseases, said:^ — "As yet we know absolutely nothing of the way by which these com- plaints have originated, and how, when once produced, they spread. There is no problem in medicine that has received more attention than this ; yet it remains unsolved. All that we think that we know is this. That each disease does not now arise spon- taneously, that the infection is of human origin, that each is frequently epidemic and far more severe at some time than at another, that children are more susceptible than adults, and that some people escape altogether, whilst others suffer every time they are exposed to fresh infection. ' ' As to how the diseases, commonly called infectious, contagious, or communicable, first appeared in the human race, we can only speculate or theorise. We know, however, something definite about how these diseases spread from person to person and from place to place. And this knowledge, although in many cases limited and fragmentary, is of the sort that proves of very great practical value, since it enables us to control, to a greater or lesser extent, the spread of these maladies. Formerly these diseases, like hurricanes, or earthquakes, or inundations, devastated a country and defied control, because people had no knowledge as to \viiether there was any regularity in the way in which epidemics of them appeared, waxed, waned, died out, and reappeared. Now, however, we have the means of finding out something about the infective material, how and where it grows, how it is conveyed from person to person and from place to place, and how it can be destroyed or limited in its action. We can deal with some diseases in much the same way as we deal with plants. We can cultivate them in human beings or other animals, regulate their distribution, modify their viru- lence, or so change the human soil in which they are accustomed to grow that they can no longer fiourish or even take root in it. Like many other processes of fermentation — for they are really so — ^they have ceased from being our masters and have become subject to us. The human mind, in its attitude towards communicable diseases, has long oscillated, and even now on occasion alternates, between panic and apathy. A knowledge of the modes in which these diseases spread, and of the means and methods of prevent- ing or controlling them should go far, very far, to remove the unreasonable fears that so long possessed people in the presence of an epidemic, or even of a single case of illness. We do not, like some savage races, kill the victims who are attacked by the disease and burn the bodies and the belongings. "We need not prohibit all commerce, or forbid all intercourse with a cholera- infected or a plague-stricken country, or even impose a 40-days' imprisonment or isolation on all persons coming from it. There is no occasion to become alarmed for our own or other people's safety when we read of persons suffering from infectious disease being taken through the public streets in ordinary conveyances without any special precautions, so far as alarmists can see. In these days of effective disinfection, and of Health Acts which' permit efficient isolation and control, we do not need to resort to shot-gun quarantine, nor need we clamor for general and com- pulsory cremation of the dead and imprisonment of the living. In most of the communicable diseases the active infective agent, the germ or virus which spreads the disease, has its own dis- tinctive characters and peculiarities, and each disease has there- fore to be dealt with in the light of what is known, or a considera- tion of what is unknown, regarding these characteristics. The measures for disinfection in whooping cough differ as much from those necessary in typhoid fever as the fencing-in of ostriches differs from the caging of canaries. As our knowledge and ex- perience of each disease increase, the really essential measures of control become simpler and more exact in their application ; more intelligible and therefore more interesting; more reasonable and therefore more tolerable. 7 General Characters of Communicable Diseases. The communicable diseases, commonly called zymotic on account of their being supposed to be due to fermentation set up by microbes, have certain characters in common. They have a definite natural history, running a course which is variable in length in the case of each disease, from origin to extinction, and usually showing, during their existence, several stages, viz., a stage of incubation, before symptoms appear; a stage of invasion, during which general symptoms begin to be evident ; a stage of advance, in which certain characteristic skin symptoms may show themselves ; and a stage of decline and con- valescence. Most of them usually occur only once in the same person, i.e., one attack confers a lasting immunity. Cases are generally supposed to be traceable to a previous case of the same disease. The diseases that feoncern us most intimately are whoop- ing cough, measles, scarlet fever, diphtheria, and typhoid fever. Consumption, though in some respects in a different category, will also be considered. About 2,300 years ago Hippocrates, "the father of medicine," said : — ' ' The physician who cannot inform his patient what would be the probable issue of his complaint, if allowed to follow its natural course, is not qnalifie'd to proscribe ajiy rational plan of treatment for its cure. ' ' The truth therein set forth regarding disease in the individual requires to be kept in view when we speak of the nature and course of epidemics. It is highly desir- able that we should know the natural history of an epidemic before we attempt to estimate the value and the effect of the measures we employ to check it. We know that individuals differ greatly in their constitution and habits ; yet scarlet fever, measles, smallpox, or typhoid fever will show a general similarity in all as regards incubation,' invasion, symptoms, decline, and period of convalescence. • Some of these features of the disease can be altered in a greater or less degree by treatment ; but the point to remember is that each of these incurable diseases runs a natural course, ending normally, if not usually, in a natural and complete recovery. Speaking generally, one can no more cure typhoid fever or any similar disease than one can cure a storm ; but, just as the shipmaster can manage and manoeuvre his vessel till the storm has spent itself, so the physician can guide his patient through the disease and its complications to a successful issue. The question then arises — Is the same true in relation to epidemics of disease ? Has an epidemic a natural course ; and can we fore- cast the rise, the acme, the decline, and the death of any epidemic in the community? 8 Very little has beeu done in connection with this subject, but the little that has been done may be set forth briefly in the follow- ing short historical account— In 1866 the late Dr. Parr wrote a letter regarding cattle plague in the United Kingdom, at a time when the disease was making most extensive ravages, and when, there seemed to be no limit to the damage it might do. He showed that as the rate at which the disease was extending was already lessening, the acme and the decline of the epidemic might besoon expected. Later on he applied his method to an epidemic of smallpox in 1871-2. Afterwards Dr. G. H. Evans worked out mathematically the method that Dr. Farr had employed in mak- ing his forecasts. Dr. Brownlee, in 1906, applied Dr. Farr's method to a large variety of epidemics. The point of general interest in connection with Dr. Brownlee .'s work is that he compares the actual figures of known epidemics in ancient and recent times with the theoretical course as marked out by Parr's mathematical curve. He takes, for instance, an epidemic of miliary fever that occurred in 1821 at Oise, in the north of France, and shows that the two agree in a manner that is very surprising. ' This disease is very well fitted to test the theory, because its cause and the means of its propagation are absolutely unknown, and it is therefore one which spreads as nearly as possible in natural conditions. Further, it is an ex- plosive disease, so that there is no.diiBeulty about knowing the beginning and the end of the outbreak. Dr. Brownlee shows that, as the number of persons exposed increased from the start to the finish of the epidemic, the decline in the number of cases must have been due to the loss of infec- tivity in the germ of the disease itself, and not to the lack of individuals who might be supposed to be open to contagion. He then takes up the great plague of London, in 1665. The number of cases is estimated from the London Bills of Mortality, and the particulars given in Pepys's Diary. Pepys speculated on the possibility of a recurrence or a recrudescence of the malady, on account of the number of people who were returning to London. In truth, however, the infective power of the disease organism was exhausted, and though great numbers of susceptible persons came from the country into the zone of infection — even, it is said, occupying the beds of those who had been afflicted — no further extension of the plague ensued. It is a popular historical belief, but nevertheless an unfounded one, that the Great Fire of London stopped the plague. An examination of the statistics of the time will show that there is no foundation for the statement. Dr. Brownlee makes some very interesting remarks on the subject of smallpox. At first sight, in epidemics where all the machinery of modern sanitation has been brought to bear, it might be expected that the form or the course of the epidemic would in some way be altered. Dr. Brownlee, however, finds that the course of recent epidemics — say, that of London in 1902 — varies little from that of epidemics in pre-sanitary days. That does not mean that there is no difference in the amount of disease present in a given epidemic; but it does mean that a uniform force, acting towards the limitation of an epidemic, produces no perceptible effect on the form of the curve. Dt. Brownlee not only includes a large variety of epidemics in his investigations, but he turns his attention to the subject of the recrudescence of epidemic diseases, and also to outbreaks and increase of violence of endemic diseases, or those which, affecting a number of persons simultaneously, seem to show a distinct con- nection with certain localities. He demonstrates that the mathe- matical forecast is also very accurate as applied to these. Some of his remarks in reference to smallpox are worthy of serious study. It is generally stated that there is a larger amount of smallpox in the vicinity of smallpox hospitals than anywhere else in the cities, and a large amount to the leeward of the pre- vailing winds. It has to be remembered, however, that a small amount of infection placed anywhere in a suitable locality is capable of producing an extensive epidemic ; and though all the cases be promptly removed from the district, the disease may continue to spread, and an epidemic develop with the typical dis- tributions in time and space. Secondly, some centres of a town are, for reasons more or less known, more suitable for the spread of an epidemic than are others; and, though the disease may first start in a part at some distance from these, yet as the epidemic proceeds and infection is introduced into these districts the cases therfe may so increase as to make those portions ulti- mately the chief centres of the outbreak. It must therefore be borne in mind that a local outbreak in the neighborhood of a hospital may be as much an accident of place as a result of the proximity of the hospital. Statements made in books of sanitary science regarding the relation of infection to the prevailing wind in the neighborhood of hospitals have too often been founded upon a single observation, and they require to be retested. The great lesson to be learned from all this is the one urged by Ovid — "Principiis ohsta; sero medicina paratur" — "Withstand the beginnings, for an after remedy comes often too late." If we give the organism of the disease no chance, we prevent or stop the epidemic. Therein lies the importance of sanitary pre- cautions. Nothing should knowingly be permitted that will allow an epidemic the opportunity to start ; but if it does gain a footing, every effort should be made to prevent its spreading from new centres of infection. 10 A knowledge of these facts regarding epidemics is very neces- sary, because without it we may be misled in two ways. "We may, on the one hand, unwarrantably assume that certain measures of prevention and isolation have effectively checked the spread of an epidemic, when, as a matter of fact, these measures were probably ineffective or useless, and the epidemic had actually burned itself out, become self-limited, or exhausted. On the other hand, we may be unnecessarily disheartened at the spread of an epidemic in spite of preventive measures which have apparently been suc- cssful in other cases. Bacteriological discoveries have given direction and precision to the work of preventing disease or checking its spread by means of isolation and disinfection, with a resultant economy of time, effort, and expense. Each disease to a certain extent presents a special problem ; but certain principles are of general application. In many cases it is easier, and in the long run more economical, to stamp out a disease than to control it. To extinguish an epidemic, however, demands (1) an intelligent co-operation of a people who have been educated in the simple principles of health; (2) a certain amount of individual sacrifice for the benefit of the whole; (3) prompt, intelligent, and effective administration; and (4) sufficent appliances for the requirements. In 1914 a committee of the Massachusetts Association of Boards of Health, in presenting a very complete and carefully considered report upon the period of isolation and exclusion from school in cases of communicable disease, said: — "Your committee has approached this task with an earnest desire to annihilate the superstitions which have surrounded the theory of the trans- mission of disease; to eliminate the hardships attendant upon unreasonable isolation and to educate the public in the methods of contracting disease. ' ' With the increase of knowledge we realise in the case of several diseases how very little is necessary for protection, but how very necessary that very little is. Not a few people, however, think that the very little is so little that it cannot be worth while. 11 Measures Necessary to Control Communicable Diseases. In 1877, at a time when preventive medicine was in its infancy, and when the role of germs in the cause and spread of diseases was unknown, Sir Thomas Watson wrote in the Nineteenth Century: — "We cannot indeed slay the human subjects of zymotic disease and those suspected of it, but we may destroy the poison which they bear within and about them. To this end the requisites are, first, the unfailing and immediate notification to the proper authorties of the occurrence of every case. Second, the instant isolation of the sick person. Third, the thorough disinfection of his body, clothes, furniture, and place of isolation. Fourth, vigilant and effectual measures to prevent the importation of disease from abroad, and to strangle it should it by mischance return. ' ' In 1868 Sir J. Y. Simpson had made a strong appeal to the public to stamp out smallpox. As measures that had been, or were likely to be, effective, he urged the earliest possible notifica- tion, isolation of the sick at home or in a hospital during the whole of the infective period, the employment of nurses and attendants who were immune to the disease, and effective disinfection during and after the disease. He believed that by applying the same principles to scarlet fever, measles, and whooping-cough, now generally known as the "school diseases," these diseases would become greatly reduced, if not extirpated. In putting very strongly the case for legislative and administrative control, Simp- son said — "A rattlesnake or a tiger escaping from a travelling menagerie into a school full of children would, in all probability, not wound and kill nearly so many of these children as would a boy or girl coming among them infected with, or still imperfectly recovered from, smallpox, or scarlet fever, or measles, or hoop- ing-cough. Most properly the cobra and the tiger — because they are always dangerous — are always, as far as possible, prohibited from making such visitations ; and the infected boy or girl should be prohibited also, during the time that they are dangerous, by running through the course and convalescence of such contagious ' diseases ; or, in other .words, while they exhale from their bodies a virus of disastrous and deadly potency. ' ' It is notable that the precautions recommended by Simpson and Watson were founded, as all trustworthy medical treatment during the past 2,000 years or more has been founded, upon ex- perience. The discovery by scientific experiment and observation 12 of the manner in which most, if not all, of these diseases are pro- pagated by germs (known also as microbes, micro-organisms, and bacteria), has confirmed the belief that control is possible, and has supplied us with the means of checking their spread. Nowa- days experience and experiment go hand in hand in the effort to abolish these deplorable scourges of humanity; for they are de- plorable when one considers the large number of preventable deaths recorded with almost unfailing regularity in every civilised community. And, as Sir Thomas "Watson pointed out, the records enumerate the killed alone. Far greater, he said, and indeed innumerable, is the multitude of the wounded, the maimed, the disabled, the impoverished, by the stroke of these dread diseases, which thus bring widespread ruin and misery upon whole families at once. 13 Legal Aspects of Control. In a free country every individual has his rights, and he should be free to exercise them. But in a free community he must also respect the rights of others. Under the common law a man has a right to take down his house, but he must not throw the stones recklessly on the pavement where the public pass by, for another person has a right to walk on the public pathway without being subjected to the danger of death or injury. He has also a right to be in a public place or a public conveyance without being com- pelled to run the risk of contracting disease from persons or things in the conveyance that may be in a condition to spread it. It is therefore a nuisance at common law, and an indictable oifence, for a person knowingly to expose another in a public high.way who is sufiEering from an infectious disease. It would be a mistake to imagine that protection by statute law from infectious disease is a peculiar development of present or recent times. In the second year of the reign of James I. a law was passed giving power to the officials of a plague-stricken town to levy a rate for the relief of the sufferers and to make regulations to prevent the spread of the disease. People attempt- ing to leave an infected house might be detained by force ; and if an infected person went into company he was liable to be put to death for felony. If he left an infected house, though not him- self infected, he was punishable as a vagabond by whipping and to be bound to his good behavior. These laws are founded on the principle that the public health is paramount, and that it is the first duty of every State to pro- tect the public, particularly the poorer classes, since it is the poor who suffer most. They also assume the principle that individual liberty may be restrained or restricted for the benefit or protection of the general community. The question arises: How far is it justifiable for the community to restrain a person's liberty of action in health matters or in any matter ? John Stuart Mill says : — ' ' The sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number is self -protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do 14 so would be wise or even right. These are good reasons for re- monstrating with him, or reasoning with him, but not for com- pelling him, or visiting him with any evil in case he do other- wise. ' ' He says, further — ' ' The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. Bach is the proper guardian of his own health, whether bodily, or mental and spiritual. Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest." Farrar says : — ' ' Man 's liberty ends, and it ought to end, when that liberty becomes the curse of his neighbors. ' ' The common law, and most if not all statute laws dealing with health, are based on these principles. A man who unfortunately has contracted smallpox or erysipelas or some disease which may be communicated to another, is not allowed to comport himself in such a way as to infect that other. The common law has for many hundreds of years made it a criminal offence for such a person to infect another either wilfully or carelessly. For ages administrators were ignorant of the precise ways in which certain diseases could be communicated; and the methods of control in some instances weighed heavily on the afflicted, and even on the healthy, where control was attempted. It is only in very recent times that medical knowledge has increased to such an extent as would .justify comprehensive action in the control of that whole class of diseases known as communicable. Since fairly complete control may be effected without great inconvenience or loss, one disease after another has passed from the category of ' ' the secret things of God" into the list of things capable of being known of all men, and of being controlled by human effort wisely directed. In proportion as people learned more about the way in which certain diseases were propagated, and the measures by which their spread could be prevented or controlled, statute law gave powers to local authorities (i.e., to the people's representatives elected by the people themselves) to interfere still more with indi- vidual liberty for the sake of protecting the whole community. 15 Local Administration. At different times and in various ways I liave set forth what these powers are in this State, and how they might be exercised and applied so as to give the community the fullest protection pos- sible, consistently with the recognition of individual rights. I have also endeavored to set forth from time to time the facts we have learned regarding the appearance and course of various diseases in this State. In the following pages I shall try to gather together in compact form the information scattered throughout numerous reports, memoranda, and pamphlets, and to supplement and illustrate this by the results of investigations and observations in other places. In South Australia every municipal council is a local board of health for its municipality, and every district council is a local board of health for its district. Where there is no council the Central Board of Health exercises the powers of a local board of health. The special powers conferred on local boards of health to control infectious diseases are set forth in the Health Act, 1898, and the regulations made under that Act. The diseases defined as infectious in the Act are leprosy, plague, yellow fever, small- pox, cholera, diphtheria, membranous croup, erysipelas, scarlet fever, searlatiaa, and the fevers known by any of the following names or descriptions: — Typhus, typhoid, enteric, relapsing, or puerperal (including all puerperal conditions depending on in- fection). Since the Act was passed- the following have been added to the list by Proclamation : — Anthrax, trichinosis, cerebro- spinal meningitis, cerebro-spinal fever, epidemic cerebro-spinal meningitis, intermittent, remittent, paludal, or malarial fever, whooping cough, measles, chicken-pox (temporarily), favus, bil- hariosis, and influenza. Pulmonary tuberculosis is not an "in- fectious disease" within the meaning of the Health Act of this State, but the law gives local authorities certain powers of control over infected persons and infected articles. The reason, or reasonableness, underlying the law with respect to the control of communicable diseases may be briefly referred to. The chief feature which all the diseases classifled as "infec- tious" under the Health Act possess in common is that they are preventable. It is this feature that gives any legislature a suffi- cient reason for so far interfering with the liberty of the subject as to cause him to notify his disease, and that gives a right to put him under necessary restraint in the matter of spreading infection among his neighbors. The State does not make legal provision for an individual being isolated because he has had his 16 arm broken, or is suffering from heart disease. Such an injury or disease will not spread by contact of persons, or be carried by clothing, or otherwise, to the houses of his neighbors ; but scarlet fever, diphtheria, and typhoid fever may so spread; and the ravages of these may mean a considerable loss of time and money to the man who has a commercial business to attend to or a pro- fession to follow, unless he has some means of protecting himself, at a reasonable limitation of liberty, and a moderate expenditure of money against the ravages of diseases that are preventable. Apart from the Health Act, speaking generally, there is no such power. What the Health Act does is this: it gives the people living in any particular district the right to form themselves into a large "health insurance association" for preventing disease from appearing among them, and for checking its spread by iso- lating and otherwise dealing with cases of the disease if it does appear. The rate which is levied for health purposes by the local board is the premium which every ratepayer pays for this pro- tection. The local board elected by the ratepayers is the local authority for carrying out all the provisions of this insurance scheme. In administering the Health Act the local boards have at their disposal the following means of becoming aware of the existence of infectious disease in the district and for preventing its spread : — Notification. Notification is made to the local authority by the head of the family or other responsible person, and by the medical practi- tioner called in to attend. No medical practitioner has any right, apart from the Health Act, to give the authorities or anyone else any information about a patient he is attending ; and the Health Act, or the direction of a judge in a court, is his only legal pro- tection when giving such information as he is required to give. Visitation and Inspection. On receiving notification of the case, the officer of health begins his duties. It has to be noted that the medical attendant is con- cerned chiefly or solely with the health of his patient, and that, having notified the case to the local board of health, his duty to the public has been performed. On the other hand the first con- cern of the officer of health is, not the well-being of the patient, but the health of the community, and how infection can be kept from spreading from that particular case to other persons. He does not, as a rule, require to see the patient; but if circum- stances occurred in which it were necessary or desirable that he should do so for the purpose of measures of isolation or disinfee- 17 tion, he would communicate with the medical attendant, and see the patient only in conjuiiction with him. In all visitation for the purposes of isolation of the patient or the check of the disease, promptness is of prime importance. A broken arm can wait with- out detriment to the health of the community ; but, if isolation of an infectious case and disinfection are to be of any use, the person and the contaminated materials must be attended to at once by the ofScers of the board. Isolation at Home. In many cases, especially m the country and in the summer season, isolation may very well be carried out at home. Local boards should order disinfectants to be used in and about the sick room, and they may, either by their officer of health, trained nurse, or inspector, supervise the use of disinfectants and remove for disinfection articles that cannot be properly disinfected at the house. CoMPLTi;SOEY Removal. In towns isolation at home is usually unsatisfactory, especially where there are families of any size, or where the house contains more than one family. In cases where proper isolation is imprac- ticable, or where the sick person is lodged in a room occupied by others of more than one family, or on board any ship or vessel, or in a common lodging-house, or in a boarding-house, the patient can be removed upon the certificate of a legally qualified medical practitioner to any hospital or other place for reception of the sick, subject to the consent of the hospital or other authorities. Such compulsory removal should seldom be resorted to; for a hospital ought to be looked upon as a place to which a patient naturally wishes to go (and all proper inducements should be held out to persuade every patient to go), both for his own sake and for the sake of others. Isolation in Hospitals. The section of the Act which allows local boards to build hos- pitals, or to contract for hospital accommodation, is one of the most important in the Act, and one which requires the greatest care and tact for its proper administration. If the section is pro- perly administered it ought to be a most effective means of check- ing the spread of infectious disease in the district. An isolation hospital, or some place to receive and seclude the sick, should be in readiness before the necessity to use it arises. If such a place is not provided until the need for it has arisen, it is usually use- less as a means of checking the spread of infection, and is of use merely for the treatment of particular patients, and not for the protection of the general community. If infection has already 18 spread from the first cases a hospital is useless for its primary- purpose as a means of isolation, and becomes merely an aid in the treatment of patients, whether paying or non-paying. Isolation hospitals should be free to all the inhabitants of the district in which the hospital is situated. The district has paid for it ; the district keeps it up, and is entitled to all the benefits which it is capable of conferring. Since it is desirable to have all the cases of infectious disease isolated in a hospital or other house at once, and since there is no authority to compel patients in ordinary circumstances to go to such places, every inducement' should be made to prevail upon them to go. Under the Health Act the only resemblance places of isolation bear to public hos- pitals is the similarity of name, and this should be avoided, if possible. Public hospitals usually exist for the benefit of the sick poor who cannot afford treatment at home, and are, there- fore, dependent on charitable individuals or the Government for admission and treatment. Isolation hospitals, on the contrary, are places provided and supported by the ratepayers of a district for their own defence and treatment, and should be open for the reception of everyone in the district who suffers from an infec- tious disease and goes there at the sacrifice of so much liberty and home comfort, and as a concession to the wishes of his neighbors. When a man receives money under the terms of an accident in- surance policy on which he has paid his premiums, we do not call him a pauper any more than we regard him as a gambler. There should not be the slightest semblance of poverty connected with these hospitals. No fees whatever should be charged, however small. There is only one exception to this general principle of free treatment, and the Act provides for it, viz., by section 145, which says that expenses may J)e recovered from a patient. This clause, which is copied in this connection from the English Public Health Act, was inserted into that Act because in countries where no such rule was in force the local boards were unable to recover fees from well-to-do people who went to isolation hospitals and demanded suites of rooms and superior attendance and food, special nurses, and additional comforts. But the section is not intended to apply to people going there in the ordinary course for isolation purposes. The English Local Government Board has stated the position thus: — "While the means of isolation afforded by the hospital is of considerable benefit to the individuals, such means should be regarded as directed to the attainment of the larger benefit of the protection of the general public health, and therefore it is, in the Board's opinion, undesirable that admission should be subject to any charges and conditions which, by operating restrictively, may 19 tend to prevent the use of the hospital by the poorer portion of the community, that is to say, by those who have the least facilities for isolation and treatment at their own homes." If a local board has no hospital of its own, then it may under the Act make terms with the managers or superintendent of any hospital, public or private, within its bounds, or outside of its bounds, on such conditions as will ensure good maintenance, nurs- ing, and medical attendance ; and the contract might be made at so much p^r case or at so much per annum for all cases. The distance at which a hospital is situated need not be a bar to the- removal of patients from even far outlying districts, since the- advantages of careful and continued nursing and the complete- removal of an active source of infection from the district more- than counterbalance the risk that arises from conveyance by rail,, ship, or ambulance, now that such modes of conveyance can be- made so convenient, comfortable, and rapid. Disinfection. Disinfection, in order to be thoroughly effective, should be done- by trained officers of the local board. A certain amount of disin- fection of bedding and of articles of clothing may be done at the infected house ; but it is preferable to have these removed to be- treated in a proper disinfector. Distance should be of compara- tively little account if proper air-tight containers are used for- conveying the articles ; and there is no reason why two or three municipalities should not contract with almost all of the other- local boards in the State to undertake all their disinfection. The procedure introduced by the Central Board about 10 years ago- has proved the most convenient, effective, and economical yet tried. It consists in sending, when requested, a trained nurse- inspector of the Board's to carry out disinfection of houses and materials on the spot, the local board not being asked to defray more than the actual expenses. Penal Clauses Against Exposure. These should be strictly enforced. The section is very compre- hensive, and refers not only to persons who are actually suffering,, but to those who, having suffered, have not sufficiently recovered to prevent infection. Proceedings may be taken by a local board of health under the Health Act, or by the police under the Criminal Law Consolidation Act, as may best suit the circum- stances. Where these various provisions for dealing with preventable- diseases have been carried out in the complete form here indicated they have been the means of saving much time and money to- the local boards, and also of preventing a great deal of unneces- sary sickness within their districts. 20 In order to deal in any way that migM be deemed necessary with epidemics in this State or threatened epidemics, an Act was passed in 1918 enabling the Governor, in case of an outbreak or danger of an outbreak, to authorise the Central Board of Health to stop all or any traffic and to limit and prevent the ingress, egress, and regress of any person to or from any house or premises, or to limit and prevent the carriage of any persons in any vehicle for such time and in such manner as the Governor may think necessary. Since the days when things relating to human health were sup- posed to concern human beings only as matters of prayer and resignation, health administrators who have urged people io work out their own safety have been charged with impiety, unbelief, or materialism. Although such theological bias, as Herbert Spencer called it, is disappearing under the influence of education and saner beliefs, another sort of bias exists, which is all the more ■detrimental to well-being on account of its assuming the garb of scientific criticism. This bias sometimes shows itself, un- consciously it may be, but it does show itself. An American Health Commissioner, addressing public health officials, said: — "We have to contend against the insincerity and the lack of ■earnest co-operation of a certain class of physicians. It is almost a daily experience in my department, and I am. sure that all health officers are confronted with the same conditions, where physicians will advise the families and patients along lines directly antagonistic to the policies of the Health Department. 'They say that we are faddish and hobby riders, and that this, and that, is not at all necessary, and assisting the family and patient to evade, violate, and set aside, the rules and regulations of your department, to the detriment of the public at large. ... I am glad to say that we haven't many" doctors in our community that ■do not co-operate with the Health Department, but there are some, as there are in every community, and they do great harm to the progress of your preventive work. ' ' In a case where a patient or his friends may wish to do some- thing pleasant or profitable to them, but inimical or risky to the public health, the family physician has not much inducement to say: "You mustn't," or "You shouldn't." It is not his interest to do so. Strictly speaking, it is not his business. He is paid by the individual for certain services which the State does not undertake, at least not as yet ; and the health officer is paid by the State for other services to the community which undoubtedly may conflict with the interests of the patient and his physician. Such conduct and the criticism that often accompanies it is not new. One cannot help remembering the bitter personal abuse to which Dr. Oliver "Wendell Holmes was subjected when he 21 endeavored to save women fi-om puerperal infection ; the strong theological opposition to Professor Simpson when he gave chloro- form to women in childbirth ; and the professional ostracism of Sir Benjamin "Ward Richardson when he challenged the practice of the indiscriminate employment of alcohol in medicine. .The attitude of some individuals and of some communities to the public administration varies from active and loyal co-operation to apathy or active hostility, including misrepresentation of scien- tific facts and of administrative principles, appeals to the avarice of individuals and to the passions of the community, and assertions that are really excuses for neglect, ignorance, and incompetence. This attitude will no doubt exist until public and private interests cease to be antagonistic and become recognised as being one. 22 A Model Lesson in Health Administration. I may refer to what has been a model lesson to the world in sanitation. From all I can gather by personal observation and inquiry, it seems to me that in Manila the most complete and ■effective system of administration extant is to be found. The Americans had to deal with a city of about 220,000 inhabitants, ■comprising Filipinos, Chinese, Spanish, other Europeans,' and Americans. The ignorance and apathy of the natives were ex- treme ; the natural difficulties connected with practical sanitation were unusually great; and the insanitary conditions for many years were almost unspeakable. An administration by a central board and local boards was tried, but proved unsatisfactory. The following account, which was written in 1908, describes the system of medical relief and control of infectious diseases as then existing, and as suited to the special circumstances of the Philip- pines at the time : — There is a Bureau of Health, the only one of its kind under the American Government. The director, as head, has very extensive powers. He is personally responsible for all financial matters. There are 11 different divisions, each having an administratjve ■chief. An assistant director is head of the inspection division. The abolition of a central board has recently been followed by the abolition of, provincial boards and the establishing, of district health officers appointed by the Governor-General. The district health officer is responsible to the Director of Health for the general sanitary condition of his district, and he has control over municipal boards of health. This control is by no means nominal ; if the president of a municipality should neglect or refuse to per- form his duty, the district health officer will take proceedings against him, and he may be subjected to a fine or imprisonment, or both, and be removed from his office. It is recognised that organisation and system mean everything in health work. The director says that experience has amply justified the change from the board to the bureau system. The saving of time alone, to say nothing of money and annoyance, has in itself fully warranted the reorganisation so far as the Bureau of Health is concerned. The city of Manila is divided into five health districts, each being under a district health officer, who acts as coroner's physician, renders help in emergency cases, and is surgeon to the police and firemen. He supervises inspections of food and water, and advises on all sanitary matters. Each station has its staff of American and native sanitary inspectors, disinfectors, and sani- tary police ; and has its dispensary, where free medical advice is 23 given by one or more municipal physicians, and where prescrip- tions of other physicians are, dispensed free of charge when marked "for the poor." There is a municipal midwife for attending the poor. Forty native police of the. City Police Department are engaged under the direction of the Bureau of Health as special sanitary inspectors. Each station is responsible for the health and sanitary condi- tions of the district in w^hich it is located. "This involves the sanitary inspection of buildings, schools, bottling works, tiendas, hotels, restaurants, yards, alleys, latrines, vaults, stables, sewers, and similar places and conveniences, and the preparation of orders for repair, or, in the case of sewers, the notification of the proper authorities." The form of order served is simple, and runs thus : — ' ' The occupant or owner of property No. , Street, is hereby ordered to Within days from date •of notice. ' ' Chief Sanitary Inspector. ' ' To an Australian, perhaps the most outstanding feature in this administration is the system of house inspection. In every house there is posted up in a conspicuous place a "Sanitary IReport" card, lO^in. by 6in. in size. An inspector visits the house two or three times a week, and enters on the card the date •and hour of his visit, the condition o£ the premises, and his name. The instructions on the card, printed in English on one side and in Spanish on the other, are as follows: — (1) The attention of the owners of this house is called to their duty of keeping the same in a clean and sanitary condition, especially the drains, closets, stables, and the interior of the same. (2) All refuse and sweep- ings should be gathered in boxes or baskets and dumped into the refuse carts which pass daily to remove them. (3) All repairs of the house should be promptly attended to and the same painted ■or whitewashed. (4) The Bureau of Health must be notified of any case of bubonic plague, smallpox, cholera, or any other con- tagious disease occurring in this house. (5) Any person who fails to carry out these instructions will be arrested and brought be- fore the Courts. Note. — Please notify the Bureau of Health of any discourtesy on the part of the sanitary inspectors. Every sanitary inspector is required to send in a daily report to the Bureau of Health, giving details of houses inspected and reinspected; of houses ordered t6 be cleaned, painted, or white- "washed, and the number so cleaned ; of the number of cesspools, vaults, yards, &c., ordered to be cleaned ; of rats caught, poisoned, or purchased ; and of the number of persons sick reported to the municipal physician. 24 This system of frequent inspection of all houses may seem very drastic; but one must remember the circumstances of the inhabitants of a city whose streets and tenements are in many eases built after the pattern of Spanish towns of 300 years ago. Many of the conditions were unspeakable. We can hardly imagine "privy vaults" two stories high in houses, yielding 8,500galls. of human excreta at a single cleaning, as the Ameri- cans found in some instances when they began operations. 1. Discovery. — Private medical practitioners attending cases of infectious disease are required to report verbally at the Health Station. The particulars are taken down by the municipal in- spector, who sees the case and fills in a regulation form. The definition of infectious disease includes cholera, smallpox, chicken- pox, plague, diphtheria, including membranous croup, ship or typhus fever, typhoid, spotted, relapsing, yellow, and scarlet fevers, measles, glanders, leprosy, anthrax, and any other diseases of an infectious, contagious, or pestilential nature, or any disease declared to be dangerous to the public health. 2. Isolation. — Persons suffering from infectious diseases are re- moved by ambulance to hospital compulsorily, where a hospital exists. The activity of the officers may be judged from the fact that orders have had to be made to prevent furious driving by ambulance conductors. In Manila all eases of infectious diseases are isolated and treated at a central hospital within the city bounds. This con- sists of a series of wooden wards, each one story in height, and standing singly, but connected by a short covered way with a common corridor. Here also -cases of smallpox and cholera are received. This method of hospital administration has much to commend it. Centralising saves expense, time, attendants, nurses, physicians, clerical work, and ambulances; and it is effective. It is gratifying to find a people who give practical effect to their scientific belief in modern modes of disinfection. Too often in many communities one finds people in authority, or whose duty it is to advise, expressing themselves as ardent sanitarians and firm believers in the efficacy of up-to-date disinfectants and methods of preventing infection, but who, nevertheless, at the first suspicion of plague or smallpox or other similar disease, cast aside all their professed belief in medical isolation, and go panic- mongering for a geographical isolation that means expense and inconvenience without being correspondingly efficient, or efficient at all. 25 All this public health machinery is augmented by a scheme of scientific investigation on a scale that we would probably charac- terise as lavish, and by a system of education and instruction in schools and other educational institutions. Probably nowhere in the world is there to be seen such a combination of commercial interests and scientific investigation as in Manila. This operates for the mutual benefit of science and commerce, and contributes to the well-being of the whole community. The Americans realise that the greatest national asset is not wealth, but health ; and they are not slow to declare that their national prosperity would be more securely established were there more health and less immediate pursuit of wealth. 26 Present Position in South Australia. A system of notification and isolation on similar lines of immediate Government control is not possible in this State under the existing laws. At present the powers are vested in the first instance in local boards of health. As yet no local board has an officer of health devoting his whole time to public health work. Not many have a trained sanitary inspector, although recently there has been a great improvement in this respect. In country places the maintenance of numerous special hospitals is out of the question. Even in the case of municipalities, no single city or town has as yet built a hospital or maintained an administrative staff to be employed solely in health work, after the models fol- lowed in European and American cities. The position in Australia is that the bulk of the population is massed in and around the capital cities. In South Australia, which is perhaps the extreme instance of this phenomenal metro- politan concentration, over 50 per cent, of the total population is so located. Of recent years a good deal has been done with a view to general isolation and disinfection under the Health Act. The majority of local boards in the metropolitan area have made arrangements with the Adelaide Hospital to receive and isolate and treat their cases of infectious disease under legal agreements. One difficulty connected with the present permissive powers of local boards is that, while one board may exercise its functions actively and intelligently, its efforts for the safety of its own com- munity are frustrated or nullified by the apathy or the unwisely- directed efforts, or spasmodic and intermittent attempts, on the part of neighboring local boards. Further, the conflicting powers and duties of various departments enter as disturbing elements in. administration. A school building, for example, is under the Education Department, the Department of Public Works, and the local board of health. All these things, plus cumbersome and possibly costly legal machinery, have to be kept in mind in con- nection with the efforts made to introduce a complete, uniform, economical, and effective system of controlling communicable diseases in this State. 27 Control of Various Communicable Diseases. The following remarks are limited almost entirely to the sub- ject of preventing the occurrence and' limiting the spread of certain diseases. There is little or no reference in them to medical treatment. There are no scientific speculations nor any useless directions about appliances or means that are not available here. In dealing with these subjects I have been careful to sift all obtainable facts and to draw logical conclusions. I have tried to render local observation fruitful by comparative study. When writing these pages I have kept in view the special requirements of this State. I have endeavored to make the observations useful to school teachers, parents, and householders ; and I am not with- out hope that they may prove of service as a guide to local boards of health when they exercise well-directed sanitary activity. If our cities and State could possibly be sanified by waves of talk they would have been disease-proof long ago. "When considering and describing some of these diseases I vividly recall circumstances in the home country in which scores and hundreds of children died from scarlet fever and measles in the midst of insanitary surroundings and active neglect, if one may use such an expression, by the local authorities, who deter- minedly resisted all attempts at isolation, refused to adopt the compulsory notification of diseases because of the expense it would entail in paying the medical fees for it, and shut their eyes to the spreading epidemics, or denied their presence until the death rate had become appalling. Then, by well-directed public and individual effort there came a hygienic upheaval, and in four or five years' time the community was in the van of public health reform and effective municipal administration. The following table, which shows the number of deaths in the various States of the Commonwealth from certain preventable diseases during the 37 years ending 1917, will give some idea of the enormous number of lives that might have been saved by well- directed efforts for prevention : — Commonwealth — Deaths for Thirty-seven Years ending 1917. btate. Small- pox Measles. Scarlet FeTev. Diph- theria. WhoopinK Cough. Typhoid Fever. Tubercu- losis. Total. New South Wales Queensland South Australia. Tasmania Victoria Western Australia 71 1 2 30 12 13 3,364 1,138 1,006 192 2,752 393 2,269 347 363 142 1,076 29 8,049 2.669 3,214 836 7,536 918 6,441 2,153 1,680 619 4,644 618 12,106 5,508 2,863 1,392 11,112 3,499 39,091 15,276 11,771 4,163 48,444 4,476 71,391 27,082 20,879 7,373 76,575 9,945 Totals 129 8,845 4,216 23,213 16,157 36,471 123,284 212,316 28 According to a computation, on a basis accepted as fairly accu- rate, this number of deaths represents a money loss of about £75,000,000 caused by deaths from a certain number of the com- municable and controllable diseases. If one estimates the loss due during that period to general sickness among the earning population of Australia, on a basis generally assumed as approxi- mately accurate, it would amount to about £74,000,000, i.e., a total of about £4,000,000 a year from deaths and general sickness alone. In addition to this, one has to take into account in the case of the damaged survivors that their tools, their health, their stock in trade, their working power, or whatever we may regard as their capital, is diminished, their entailed estate is depreciated, their handicap is increased, temporarily or permanently. One might imagine that this subject would be inquired into and found worthy of being treated even from the point of view of mere economies apart from any questions of charity, philanthropy, Christianity, or religion of any sort, science, socialism, or humanity. The total number of deaths in Australia from communicable diseases during 37 years ending 1917 — not so very much more than a single generation — was 212.316. These figures include the dead only, not the damaged. The deaths were preventable. The diseases are controllable and eradicable. During that period the deaths from tuberculosis alone numbered 123,284, the number of males and females being not greatly unequal — about 17 to 13. All things considered, it may be agreed that a human pair, a man and a woman, are of more value to the State and the race than two men. Think of 123,284 sons and daughters dead from tubercu- losis alone — a preventable disease. If an enemy had done this to us! Since we did it ourselves we say, "God's will be done" — if we say anything at all. The deaths from measles and whooping-cough numbered 25,002, and were all the more deplorable since these were of young people who were presumably of more value to the State than an equal number of dged people would have been. For, be it noted, those who escaped death or injury were not the fittest ; in many cases they were not even fit ; they were merely the non-exposed. The action of these diseases has no more beneficially selective in- fiuence than war has on communities, on nations, or on the race. About 40 years ago Pasteur said: — "It is within man's power to wipe infectious diseases off the earth. ' ' A recent writer says that these diseases, if they still exist among civilised people, do so with the consent of the people in the face of a full knowledge of the manner of their prevention. Rosenau says : — ' ' It is plain that man is the great source and reservoir of human infections. Man is man's greatest foe in this regard. The fact that most of the communicable diseases must be fought in the light of an infection spread from man to man 29 is one of the most important advances im preventive medicine. . . The knowledge that most infections are spread rather directly from man to man brings in all the forces of sociology to that of preventive medicine. The task of preventive medicine is thereby rendered much more difficult from the fact that most in- fections depend upon the control of man himself. We ruthlessly wage war against insects or against infected food or water. In other words, we can arbitrarily control our environment to a very great extent, but the control of man himself requires the consent of the governed. . . . The fact that man is the chief source and reservoir of most of his own infections adds greatly to the scope and difficulties of public health work and often makes the prevention of disease depend upon social changes. In this sense preventive medicine is the true sociology. ' ' When epidemics of diphtheria, typhoid fever, or scarlet fever occurred, people thought a general clean-up of insanitary condi- tions was the one necessity and they salved their consciences accordingly. Now it is known that general sanitation is a secon- dary element in the spread or prevention of such diseases. There is something else to be attended to, something very different, a very personal element. For the prevention of infection in many diseases is literally in the hands of the public themselves. Money grants, medical officers, inspectors, isolation hospitals, visiting nurses, quarantine, disinfection, do not amount to much so long as people cannot keep their fingers from their mouths and noses. If nothing touched or passed the nose or lips except what we knew to be clean, it is safe to say that epidemics would be un- known. Every true citizen is, or should be every day personally con- cerned Avith this subject from the point of view of his own well- being and of State efficiency. If 6,000 lives are lost annually in Australia through apathy, stupidity, ignorance or avarice, or all combined, and that, too, with scarcely a passing thought of State or individual responsibility, one wonders what catastrophe will be required to awaken the people of the Commonwealth to the gravity of the situation. 30 WHOOPING COUGH. Whooping cough in this State, judged from the death rate alone, is a dangerous disease. And it is all the more dangerous on account of the indifference with which people regard it. During the past 30 years 1,248 persons have died from this painful and distressing malady — more them six times as many as have died from scarlet fever within the same period. In the 10 years ending 1918, during which the disease has been notifiable, 9,064 cases have been reported, with a mortality of 289 — over 3 per cent. The number of deaths from this disease alone has been more than 30 per cent, greater than from measles and scarlet fever combined for the same period. During the 20 years before notification the deaths average 47.9 yearly ; while during the 10 years in which notification has been in force they averaged 28.9; the increase of population during the period being about 25 per cent. Investigations, founded upon observations made by teachers in the public schools here, show that the disease in this State has very much the same characters as in other countries. It is said that in Great Britain whooping cough and measles kill more chil- dren than all the other zymotic diseases put together, and not uncommonly one is the sequel of the other. "Whooping cough occurs very frequently during convalescence from measles. There is a view that epidemics of whooping cough and measles alternate with each other, and that the diseases are therefore mutually exclusive. Observations in this State do not support this view. The disease is very infectious from the very first appearance of symptoms of catarrh, cough, or sneezing ; and this may be one or more weeks before the characteristic cough begins. It is this fact that constitutes the peculiar difficulty in the control of this disease and measles. It is a difficulty that requires to be met by special and definite measures of administration, not a difficulty that makes control impossible. In the later stages of the disease the infectiveness diminishes. The infective material, which exists in the sputum, and is discharged from the mouth and nose, is passed on to other persons by direct contact or in droplets of moisture sprayed off, even in the open air at short range, in coughing, sneezing, laughing, or talking. These droplets carry it into the air passages of other people. The disease may also be communicated by means of roller-towels, handkerchiefs, drinking cups and other articles used by children in common ; and it may possibly be conveyed through the medium of a third person. It is communicable to oertain of the domestic animals such as dogs and cats, and it may be acquired from them. 31 There is no other communicable disease to which children dur- ing the earliest years of life are so susceptible, as they are to this. There appears to be no immunity from the disease. Almost every one exposed acquires it. The most common age for children to be attacked is from 2 to 5 years, but younger children and adults may also suffer. It is most fatal in infants under 1 year, but in any child under 5 years of age it is serious. Girls appear to be more susceptible than boys, and to suffer more. The proportion of cases among girls and boys is about almost five to four. Feeble children are more likely to be attacked than the strong, and they suffer more severely from the disease itself and from complica- tions. Nervous and excitable children have more severe paroxysms than those of robust constitution. A second attack of the disease is very rare. "The spread of whooping cough is limited to no definite time, no season, no weather conditions ; yet the severity of the disease may change with these circumstances. ' ' Epidemics are rarest in summer. Infection. Only a very short exposure to the infective matter or in the neighborhood of a sick person is necessary. Overcrowding in rooms, houses, or streets, helps the spread of an epidemic. There seems to be no possibility of predicting when or where the disease will be fatal, severe, mild, complicated, or simple. But it does appear possible to escape the disease by avoiding contact and personal intercourse with patients and infected materials. Incubation. After exposure to infection there is a period of incubation of from two or three days to two or three weeks, but usually about a fortnight, during which nothing noticeable occurs. Invasion. The stage of invasion follows, during which the child is sicken- ing for the disease. The symptoms of an ordinary cold appear — slight rigors or chills, slight redness and watering of the eyes, running from the nose, sneezing, a feeling of tightness in the chest, hoarseness, more or less severe cough, not to be distin- guished from the ordinary cough of bronchitis, unless it be more sonorous and more acute. The expectoration is limited and scanty. Fever is sometimes present for a day or more, and it may assume the intermittent or remittent type. There may be some constitutional disturbance, such as heaviness, depression of spirits, restlessness, moroseness, and loss of appetite. During this 32 time the disease both in children and in adults resembles an ordi- nary catarrh, only the cough is more frequent and obstinate, and the patient is more troubled with a feeling of tickling in the throat and windpipe. This stage usually lasts from five to 12 days, but may extend to a month, or longer. Stage oe Spasm or Convulsive Cough. The fever, if it has been present, now decreases or ceases. The cough begins to be more marked and characteristic. It occurs in paroxysms that increase in length and severity. The child appears frightened or anxious, and may cry. He remains motionless and holds his breath. Repeated violent expirations, perhaps from six to 20, are rapidly made, with the body bent for- ward and the hands holding on to the knees or to something firm to steady the body during the convulsive movements ; and so rapidly are the expirations repeated that the child's face and neck are swollen and livid, the veins stand out like cords, the eyes protrude and are suffused, and saliva flows from the mouth. The patient appears in danger of suffocation from stoppage of the breath ; then the convulsive movements of the muscles of breath- ing abate, and a deep, loud, long-drawn crowing or whistling in- spiration or "whoop" occurs. This may be repeated three or four times consecutively during each paroxysm* and the tem- porary attack ends with the discharge of mucus, either scanty or profuse, from the lungs, or by vomiting, or by both. Sometimes bleeding occurs from the ears, mouth, nose, and lungs, and the urine or faeces may be discharged. Bleeding may occur in the "white of the eye." The skin is bathed with perspiration, is cool, pale, and sensitive to cold. An attack usually lasts from two to two and a half minutes. Then the child quickly recovers, may become cheerful, wishes to eat, and goes about playing as usual, if the attack be mild; if severe, it may be followed by drowsiness or prostration, or pains in the muscles of the chest, abdomen, and limbs. Convulsions may occur. Violent efforts, running, much speaking, mental excitement, will bring on an attack or lengthen it, or make it more severe. An attack in one patient will start off an attack in another. Attacks are often more frequent and more severe during the night and towards morning, but after every attack the child falls asleep again almost immediately. This may occur only during the night. Sometimes the paroxysms consist of sneezes instead of coughs. It is doubtful if death ever occurs during a paroxysm. The number of paroxysms during the day varies with the severity of the disease. They may be few ; usually they average about 20 in the 24 hours, but they may amount to a hundred within that time. If the number exceeds 40 the condition is very serious ; if over 60 the patient will almost certainly die of some complication. The violence of the paroxysm decreases as the cough becomes looser. Some persons may have the disease, and may infect others, without suffering from these paroxysms. This stage usually lasts from three to four weeks, but it may be longer or shorter. Stage of Decline. The stage of decline follows. The paroxysms are fewer and less severe, the cough loses its characteristic features, and within about six weeks usually disappears, and the child recovers its normal health. The cough, however, may return on account of exposure to cold, or from other causes, and may assume the characteristic whoop ; but during this recurrence the disease is usually not actively in- fective ; the whoop is very much a habit, and may continue for a long time. A complete change of air usually helps or hastens recovery. If the stage of invasion is short,"" the convulsive stage wiU usually also be short; the sooner the whoop appears the sooner will it disappear. Complications. These are not uncommon. The severity of paroxysms and the vomiting may interfere with the nutrition of the chid, and cause exhaustion, prostration, and loss of flesh. Other diseases may follow, such as bronchitis, emphysema, pneumonia, marasmus, and cerebral haemorrhsige, and deaths are certified as being due to these and not to the original cause, whooping cough. Other and non-fatal troubles may follow, such as weakness of the heart, disturbance of the nervous system, weak intellect, defective memory, defects of sight, dea&ess, asthma, hernia, permanent deformity of the chest. Latent tuberculosis is often lighted up. Isolation. Every effort should be made to isolate every case of whooping cough, so that other children may not acquire the disease. Every year that a child passes without taJiing the disease adds to the probability of avoiding it, and to the likelihood of recovery should it unfortunately contract it. If possible, isolate the child whom you wish to protect from the disease. It is unfortunate that hospital isolation is too often out of the question in cases where the patients require it most, viz., in the case of very young children, since provision must be made for the mothers to attend them. 34 At home the patient should be strictly separated from others so« long as the paroxysms last, and for a few days after they havfr ceased. If the cough should recur after having once ceased, it is. not necessaory to isolate the patient again. The prevention of contact with other children is the object aimed at ; seclusion or isolation in the house is a means, but not the only means of attaining this object. In some places, even infected children, while' in a condition to spread infection, are- allowed to go about if they bear on the breast or arm some dis- tinctive notice that they are suffering from the disease, and are- to avoid close contact with others. If this could be carried out under proper supervision it might prove much more effective- than the "isolation" that is usually attempted, or supposed to- be attempted, at home. "Isolation of disease" is not a matter of mere location of a patient. In school a watch should be kept on all children for symptoms, of cold, and everyone showing symptoms should be isolated at home. Any child with a cough accompanied by vomiting, or with a long-continued cough occurring in paroxysms, should be ex- cluded from school. Disinfection. Everything used by the patient — ^handkerchief, clothes, towels,, bedding, dishes, spoons, toys, furniture — should be disinfected before being removed from the room where the patient is, and aU remnants of food should be destroyed by burning. The- material coughed up should be received in gauze, or handker- chiefs or similar cloths, which should be disinfected or burned. After the patient has recovered it is well to disinfect the room, although free ventilation, with exposure of infected articles to- sunlight and fresh air, will generally be sufficient. Return to School. As a rule, children will be able to return to school in from eight to 10 weeks from the beginning of the whooping stage ; or two weeks after the characteristic spasmodic cough has quite: ceased. , Quarantine op the Exposed. This should extend to 21 days. MEASLES. Measles is by far the most common of all the eruptive diseases of school life, and is therefore a -most important disease from the State point of view. It demands many lives, and entails much suffering as well as great actual loss. In this State during the past 30 years 762 deaths have occurred from it — nearly four times as many as from scarlet fever. In the 10 years ending 1918, during which the disease has been notifiable, 22,989 eases were reported, with a mortality of 121 — a little over 0.5 per cent. During the 20 years before notification the deaths averaged 30.2 yearly ; while during the 10 years in which notification has been in force they averaged 10.1, the increase of population during the period being about 25 per cent. It is difficult to §ay how many more deaths due to the disease appear in the statistics under the headings of bronchitis, pneumonia, or tuberculosis. Extensive statistics of various countries show that the fatal cases amount to from 1 to 6 per cent, or more. Overcrowding in houses has a very marked influence on the mortality. In one city in Great Britain it was found that the case-mortality was eight times higher in one-roomed tenements than in those of four or more rooms. It is true that attacks are often mild ; but it is also true that very grave complications may occur during their course; that uncomplicated cases may be severe, or even malignant ; and that, even if a patient recovers, serious after-effects may remain. Epidemics occur at intervals, apparently when there is a suf- ficient number of susceptible persons to be affected. Overcrowd- ing in rooms, houses, or streets, in addition to increasing the case- mortality, also helps the spread of an epidemic. In one city in Scotland it was found that the attack-rate of measles among in- fants and young children was ten times higher in families living in one-room tenements than in families living in tenements of four or more rooms. Schools are fertile breeding-grounds for the disease. Judging from the number of deaths recorded, it would seem that during 20 years epidemics in this State occurred about once every five years ; but that for the past 10 years, the disease has been almost endemic. During some of these epidemics it was not uncommon for persons to suffer from a second and even a third attack. In 1901 returned soldiers from South Africa, who brought the disease with them, suffered very severely. The rash on the face at first looked very like the rash of smallpox, and the patients almost invariably suffered from temporary loss of voice when they began to recover. 36 Much might be done to save children from death or from the permanent evil effects of this disease if parents' only knew. Speaking nowise too strongly of the criminal procedure of ex- posing children purposely to the so-called "harmless" diseases, an American writer says, regarding measles: — "Experience shows that the public needs instruction, and that it complies with reasonable restrictions as soon as it learns the necessity. Laymen are not fools, and will not intentionally kill their own offspring, nor will they deliberately inurder other children. ' ' The State Board of Health of Pennsylvania, many years ago, said: "In view of the mortality and disability, with which this disease is justly chargeable, and of the fact that preventive measures have been so generally adopted in the case of these other diseases which do so much less harm, can we longer afford to regard with indifference this serious menace to the life and health of the rising generation? 'Measles and its death toll' in this country, as abroad, may well be said to have become a question of national importance." Efforts to check epidemics of measles proved disappointing, possibly because, as is now believed, the requirements in force failed to steer between the Seilla of excess and the Charybdis of inadequacy. The fact that infection of a number of children may occur in a school from one child who, presents the symptoms of only a slight cold shows how difficult it is to control the spread of this disease, as compared with some others. Further, a school, as a rule, was closed on account of measles only when the atten- dance had dwindled so that it became hardly worth while to keep it open. If an epidemic of measles is to be stamped out a school- room should be closed as soon as the first case has been found among the pupils, and every suspicious case should be isolated. It is easier to check the spread of smallpox than of measles ; and yet our attempts to prevent the large loss of life from measles that occurs every few years cannot compare in activity with our endeavors to prevent plague or smallpox — diseases which are hardly ever likely in this State to cause so many deaths or so much permanent misery as measles is. If we were reasonable, logical, patriotic, or humane, we should make even greater efforts to check an outbreak of measles than one of smallpox. That measles can be checked by prompt measures has been shown practically by Dr. McVail, in .connection with an outbreak in the village of Larbert, in Scotland. He gives the following account^ — -"In the somewhat straggling and scattered town of about 10,000 inhabitants there are two schools — one with about 700 pupils and the other with about 1,000. Measles had pre- vailed amongst the children attending Larbert village school, and had practically spent itself. The distance between the schools is 37 about a mile, and the population along the connecting road is not at all dense. Bach school, therefore, has a pretty well-defined area from which it draws its pupils. And, as it happened, the disease did not attack any school children living in the east area until it had nearly died out in the west. Then a single case occurred in the infant department of the Central school, and the child attended school for two or three days whilst in the acutely infectious catarrhal stage. When the disease was recog- nised the child was kept at home. Now, it happened that, through the teacher and the local sanitary inspector, this case came to my knowledge within three or four days of the appear- ance of the rash. I immediately visited the school, and after explaining the rationale of the proposed procedure to the teacher and to the convener of the school committee, I closed the infant department for a fortnight. During that fortnight about a dozen chiljiren of this department developed measles. They were the first crop from the seed planted in the school. Before the depart- ment was reopened, all the households sending children to it were visited, and a list made of those who had by this time been at- tacked. The children of these houses were excluded from atten- dance, and the result was that the epidemic was nipped in the bud. There was no second crop in the school. Three or four children were attacked who lived near those of the first crop and played with them during their catarrhal stage; but the propin- quity of the other cases, and the publicity resulting from school closure and the visitation of infected houses, had warned the parents to be on the lookout, and these three or four children were kept at home from the beginning of the catarrhal stage. ' ' This shows how the disease, universally recognised as the widest spreading and most uncontrollable of all infectious diseases, can be kept within bounds by an officer of health who knows his work and does his duty promptly, and has faith in modern methods of isolation. An illustration of the possibility of checking the spread of measles was furnished in 1875, in connection with an epidemic in the Faroe Islands. In this connection the historian says: — ' ' Quarantine is beyond a doubt the most reliable measure for pre- venting the spread of measles. Even in case of a house in an infected villeige, the family found it possible to keep out the disease by avoiding any contact with the other villagers, and it was still "less difficult to exclude contagion from a whole village by isolating it. About 1,500 of the inhabitants, who tried this plan on their own initiative, remained free from infection. Dur- ing the epidemic the authorities succeeded, with the assistance of the people, in maintaining a quarantine which entirely sufficed to protect a considerable number of the islands from the disease. ' ' 38 Newman says: — "The prevention and control of measles, like that of whooping-cough and tuberculosis, is largely in the hands of the public themselves." The failures to stamp out measles in Great Britain have been ascribed to several specified condi- tions, some of which, however, do not exist in this State; and from the way in which local outbreaks have from time to time been controlled here, and also from experience gained from sea- quarantine on a large scale, we have reasonable assurance that the disease can be kept in check. Colonel Munson, Divisional Surgeon in the United States Army, has given an account of the most extensive, detailed, and scientific epidemiological study yet made of an outbreak of measles, including an account of the successful control of the disease by appropriate measures. In January, 1917, there were 23 regiments, numbering in all 13,773 troops, at Wilson Camp, San Antonio, Texas, when an outbreak of measles occurred. , In two of the regiments, totalling 2,411 personnel, the disease be- came epidemic through neglect, inertia, and disobedience of orders. There never was open opposition to sanitary measiires; some interest in them was manifested; and there was a steady succession of excuses as to why certain things were not done, with promises of immediate improvement, which were not fulfilled. The officers were pleasant gentlemen, whose highly limited mili- tary experience had not given them the faculty of maintaining sanitary discipline and enforcing their own orders thereon. They were not organizers, and could not see that an order issued was not necessarily an order carried out. In 21 of the 23 regiments the outbreak was absolutely controlled by the observance of simple preventive measures. Colonel Munson states that the studj"^ of this outbreak has resulted in so much new information about the spread and control of measles that outbreaks need no longer be apprehended, and the death rate from this cause may be reduced to a practically negligible factor. He says. — "The prevention and control of measles here- tofore has been attempted by measures of which the purpose was usually only partly understood, and which were incomplete in application. Consequently the results were unsatisfactory. Measles, once started, tended to persist either until all the sus- ceptible material had been attacked and immunised or new seasonable environment created conditions unfavorable to the de- velopment and spread of the measles virus. In other words, measles tended to continue until brought to an end by factors of self limitation. While with precise measures of prophylaxis we expected to bring smallpox, malaria, and some other diseases under absolute control, the same expectation was not entertained with respect to measles. 39 "But the writer believes that, as a result of the present epidemic and its study, so much light has been shed on 'the epidemic causa- tion and development of measles as to make its control, except as to scattered cases in individuals, a matter of almost absolute cer- tainty. He would simply apply and enforce the preventive measures outlined for this camp, carried out in the 21 organisa- tions which escaped epidemics of this disease, and which were ignored or largely nullified in the two organisations that became generally infected. He believes not only that measles epidemics are preventable, but that hereafter they should be prevented. He believes that they can be quite as well controlled in recruit depots and barracks as in the field, provided that suitable ventilating and other facilities are provided." After setting forth "'Points to Observe in Measles Prevention and Control," Colonel Munson continues: — "Measles is a thoroughly preventable and controllable disease. A few scat- tered cases will occur, and in the absence of definite knowledge as to the causative agent, are necessary to making the diagnosis of the presence of the infection. But if the foregoing rules, based on the experience in this camp, are carried out, the writer does not hesitate to state his firm conviction that measles need not occur in epidemic form. He considers the preventive measures which the above rules embody as effective against it as are the preventive measures employed against any other disease, except those in which immunity is conferred by protective inocu- lation. He considers that this great cause ftf military inefficiency is removable, that its existence hereafter as an epidemic should be a reproach to the commander or medical officer concerned, a reflection on their efficiency and a cause for official investigation and discipline. "While the present outbreak was regrettable from the stand- point of the individuals and organisations concerned, it is be- lieved that from the larger viewpoint of general military welfare it is a public benefaction of the greatest value, inasmuch as it has afforded opportunity for the formulation of simple, exact preventive measures, which, in the future, should in the aggregate save a vastT amount of inefficiency, sickness and death from what has heretofore been regarded as inseparable from the recruitment of military forces and the aggregation of troops. ' ' The foregoing narratives of experiences have been given at some length, because they show how a disease that has generally been declared to be a typical instance of a dangerous and uncon- trollable infectious disease may be completely controlled in schools, military camps, quarantine stations, and elsewhere by simple measures promptly, carefully, and faithfully carried out. 40 Infection. Measles is infectious from, if not actually before, the beginning of the visible symptoms, that is, for some days, even as many as five, before the rash appears. The infective material, the exact nature of which is not known, is contained in the blood and in the secretions of the nose and mouth. These secretions are the usual means of transmitting the disease, both directly in the actual contact of individuals, and indirectly, if persons are in the same room or near each other, through particles of moisture floating in the air. The infective matter is diffused rapidly and extensively. A very small quantity is sufficient to transmit the disease ;. and a short exposure in the same room with a patient will usually in- fect a susceptible person. It is possible that infection may be conveyed by infected materials and by means of a third person; but this mode of transmission is very rare. The infective material is more diffusible than in the ease of scarlet fever, but it does not cling to houses and articles as in that disease. Outside the body it is short-lived ; and it would appear that infection is not usually transmitted after seven days from the appearance of the rash, nor after the patient's temperature has become normal. There seems to be no natural immunity to this disease ; nearly every exposed individual takes it at one time or other of life; adults who have not previously had the disease acquire it as readily as children do; but young infants usually are not in- fected. There appears to be no " sex-pref erenee ' ' in this disease. ♦ Incubation. The length of the incubation period of this disease appears to be fairly constant. For nine or ten days after exposure to the in- fection there are few symptoms. Sometimes there is languor, lassitude, malaise, or headache. Then the symptoms come on gradually. Invasion. The child suffers from a "cold," or "influenza." The throat is congested. There is an acrid discharge from the nose, and frequent and violent sneezing. The eyes are red and watery, and intolerant of light. The face may be swollen and puffy. Fre- quently there is hoarseness and a hard, dry, painful, and high- pitched cough. Rarely, there may be convulsions or vomiting. Bleeding from the nose is not uncommon, but is rarely severe. A false croup sometimes occurs in young children. These local symptoms vary much in intensity. The constitutional symptoms consist of more or less fever; irregular chilly sensations, although actual chills are rare ; im- paired appetite ; pain in the head and limbs ; lassitude, drowsi- ness, irritability, and debility. 41. This stage lasts, on an average, for four days ; but it may vary from a single day to seven days, and occasionally extend to ten. In measles, about the second day of the stage of invasion, an eruption occurs on the palate and the inside of the cheeks. This consists of small irregular spots of a bright red color. In the centre of each spot there is seen in strong daylight a minute bluish-white speck. There are usually no more than two or three spots on the palate ; on the lining of the cheeks there may be upwards of half a dozen ; and in marked cases they may cover the whole surface. They occur in nearly every case of measles, and -are found in no other disease.. For these reasons, and since they appear, two or three days before the general skin rash, they are of particular value when found, because their presence enables one to say positively that the child is sickening for measles. Stage of Skin Eruption. This usually commences on the thirteenth or fourteenth day after exposure. The characteristic skin rash is seen about the face and neck. Its starting points most commonly are the side of the neck, temples, the forehead (near the hair), the cheeks, the chin. From these centres it spreads over the he'ad and neck. The eruption not uncommonly becomel confluent, and makes the skin dusky and turgescent. Within 36 or 48 hours it has spread successively ovpr the back, forearms, front of the trunk, lower limbs, and the body generally. At first the eruption appears like small red dots or specks, re- sembling, in the early stages, flea-bites, which grpw larger, become slightly raised, and form crescentic patches — in size from a pin- head to a bean — of a dull or deep reddish-purple color, and of velvety smoothness, between which portions of normal skin can be seen. There is not the bright red or scarlet appearance seen in scarlet fever. The color disappears on pressure. The skin is sometimes very itchy, and papules, sometimes vesicles, may appear. On the fourth day the rash commences to fade from the face, and later from the trunk and limbs. Then peeling begins. The skin looks as if it were powdered over with flour, and it is usually shed off in fine branny scales or scurf — ^not in large shreds, as in scarlet fever. In some cases the distinctive rash of measles may be preceded, by a rash of a different character. There may be a general faint reddish rash, not unlike rash of measles, but confined to the body and limbs. Not infrequently there may be a general rash, resembling the eruption of scarlet fever, but more transient and more diffuse. This may lead to a diagnosis of scarlet fever; and F 42 it is not uncommon for eases of this sort to be sent to hospital as •cases of scarlet fever instead of measles. "While the rash is coming out the symptoms already mentioned ■continue and increase in intensity. There is fairly high fever; i:he tongue is coated and marked by red points ; and deafness may occur. When the rash is fully established the fever abates. Peeling of the skin goes on for from four to eight days. In some cases it may not be visible. Sometimes the rash suddenly recedes, usually because some lung complication or other cause affects the heart and circulation. The eruption then may resemble bluish spots on the pale skin, ■or it may disappear entirely. There is reason to believe that the disease is most highly in- fectious at the time of the appearance of the rash. Complications. Under proper care and with proper attention few people need ■die from measles. The patient should be carefully protected. A chill may give rise to serious consequences. On the other hand, ventilation should be good. In an epidemic occurring in a cold winter, I have known many children die from measles complicated with bron- chitis because the mothers would insist on keeping them in front of the fire in a close room where the air was almost unbreatheable. In young people lung complications are specially common, and they' not infrequently lead to consumption. A most dangerous complication is membraneous laryngitis. In one hospital in Paris, in 1,633 cases of measles, 235 patients suffered from this malady, and 218 of these died. Grangrene of the mouth is a rare but frightful complication. The most common evil effects of measles are bad eyes and diseases of the ears. There may be a sort of satisfaction in knowing that in some eases measles seems to have effected a cure in cases of chronic skin disease, epilepsy, mania, and joint disease. Isolation. As in whooping cough, so in measles, every effort should be made to isolate every case and to prevent other children from taking the disease. Every year passed without acquiring the disease adds to the probability of escaping it, and to the likeli- hood of recovery should it be acquired. Almost everywhere the case-mortality is higher in children under one year of age and remains high during the second and third years, after which it falls rapidly until at the age of 15 it is practically negligible. 43 Isolation of a case implies also the withdrawal of all the other children of the family from the day school and from the Sunday school and from contact with other children outside. A watch ■should be kept on all children — especially those in infant classes — for symptoms of colds ; and every one showing signs of a cold •or languor should be isolated at home and excluded from school. Disinfection. Evidence is by no means conclusive that the infective material •of measles clings to furniture and other articles ; in fact children in schools, after the lapse of a certain time, have used the same seats, desks, and materials as other children who suffered from measles without acquiring the disease, so long as they did not ■come into actual contact with, or within the range of droplet in- fection by, the sufferers. At the same time it is well to disinfect the room and its contents where a patient has been isolated, as in the case of whooping cough, and to ventilate it freely and to ■expose the possibly infected articles. During illness all dis- ■charges from the mouth and eyes should be re<;eived in gauze, or handkerchiefs, or in similar cloths, which should be disinfected ■or burned. Return to School. As a rule children may return to school after three weeks of Ihe appearance of the rash. Quarantine of the Exposed. This should extend to 16 days. 44 SCARLET FEVER. Scarlet fever, or scarlatina — for these are two names for the same thing — is a very common and a very serious disease. It is not so universally distributed as measles, being found but rarely in certain parts of the world. It is more variable in its forms and symptoms than any other of the eruptiye fevers, and its dangers are more difficult to foresee. During the past 30 years in this State 199 deaths have occurred from it — about one-fourth as many as from measles. In the 20 years ending 1918, during which the disease has been notifiable, the annual average of deaths was 5.6, while during the previous 10 years, when notification was not compulsory, the annual average was 8.6. Certain facts show that it would not be logical to ascribe the entire decrease in" the death rate to notification and its consequences. The number of cases of scarlet fever reported during the past 20 years was 7,402, with a death rate of 0.7 per cent. The number of deaths alone gives little information regarding the total mischief caused by the disease. Many other diseases which have proved fatal or have caused great suffering oi* loss have had their origin in attacks of scarlet fever, perhaps many years previously. Some epidemics are very mild, scarcely a fatal case or even a severe one occurring. AH at once, however, a mild epidemic may take on a severe form, or single severe cases may occur in the midst of the mild ones. It is impossible to predict whether any given case will be mild, severe, or malignant. "While few, if any, escape an attack of measles when exposed thereto, not half the people in a community — usually less than 40 per cent. — take scarlet fever ; and while the liability to acquire measles continues throughout life, the susceptibility to scarlet fever, which increases from birth, diminishes after the fifth year. The disease shows itself most commonly in children from three to six years old. The immunity from scarlet fever, on the part of a large numbet" of the population, may be due to the particular methods in which the infection is conveyed rather than to any definite insusceptibility. A study of nearly 150,000 deaths in England and Wales showed, that over one-half of the deaths occurred in children under five years of age, about 90 per cent, occurred in those under 10 years, and over 95 per cent, in those under 15 years of age. Statistics of the disease in other countries show a similar age mortality. 45 As regards families, some show a relative immunity from the disease ; others exhibit a special susceptibility to it not noticed in any other similar disease; and in some the disease is so severe as to lead to their total and sudden extinction. Grown-up persons may, for some unknown cause, resist the disease during several exposures, and then on the occasion of another exposure may acquire it. Careful research has not shown that women after childbirth are more susceptible to true scarlet fever than other persons are. In children under one year the disease is uneomtnon ; in those under six months it is more rare ; in those under three months- it is extremely rare. It has been observed, however, in a child of two weeks old. A second attack of the disease seldom occurs; but Dr. Ben- jamin Ward Richardson states that he himself had the disease three times. It is said that second and third attacks are never fatal. It is stated, however, that in some cases they have never- theless been more severe than the first attack. Infection. The exact nature of the infective material cannot be said to be known as yet. The infection clings pertinaceously to houses, furniture, clothing, hair, and such things in a way very different from the infective material of measles; but, for all this, the disease is not nearly so infectious as measles. The infection of scarlet fever is much less diffusible, and there is this great prac- tical difference, that whereas a child sickening for- measles is in a condition to infect others, all of whom are susceptible, for about a fortnight before it is possible to* diagnose the disease, a child with scarlet fever is not very likely to infect the less numerous susceptible people until the symptoms are evident. One would imagine from these considerations that the results of attempts to control scarlet fever in populous communities would be fairly satisfactory. It appears that they have not in- variably been so; or, at least, that those people who have inquired into or discussed them are not agreed on the subject. The infective material is carried by the discharges from the throat and nose, and also, later in the disease, by discharges from the ears and from discharging glands. Infection occurs usually from active contact with infected materials, either directly through bodily contact with the patient by hand-touch or kissing ; or indirectly by carpets, bed and body clothing, thermometers, handkerchiefs, towels, food, toys, and such like articles that have become contaminated. Droplet-infection is not such an impor- tant factor as in the case of measles. Some articles may retain the infection for months, and even for years. Infection may 46 occur through the medium of third persons. Epidemics from in- fected milk are not uncoiiimon, and they are sometimes very ex- tensive. It used to be thought that scarlet fever could be communicated by means of the shreds of shed skin as in measles, but more effec- tively and more commonly than in that disease. Experimental evidence is against the view that the skin is a dwelling-place of the infective material in either disease ; but it would appear that in scarlet fever if not also in measles the skin, unless specially cared for, can hardly escape contamination by the infective dis- charges, and thus may communicate the disease. A fairly large number of cases have been recorded in which the disease has been spread by true carriers who have been perfectly ' well, and Who have not themselves shown any symptoms of the disease at any time. In this State it is not uncommon for the disease to occur in isolated cases far apart, and not to assume an epidemic form or spread to any other individuals. Only a very short exposure is necessary. The infection prob- ably enters the system through the mouth and nose. Incubation. There is great difficulty in definitely determining the period of incubation. For practical purposes we may assume that it is usually from two to seven days; but it may be only 24 hours, or even less. The commonest period is probably from two to four daj'-s. Rarely, it may extend to 14 days. Invasion. The invasion is usually sudden. Vomiting occurs very fre- quently as one of the earliest symptoms. Fever follows — sharp, sudden, and severe — and is more noticeable than in any other eruptive disease. It may or may not be preceded by a chill. Then sore throat is noticed, accompanied, perhaps, by pain in swallow- ing. The throat is very red ; the skin feels very hot and burning to the touch, and may be itchy ; thirst is often very great ; the eyes are dull and listless ; and the face is flushed. Headache and giddiness are common, and sleepiness may alternate with rest- lessness. Brain symptoms occurring early in the disease usually indicate malignant scarlatina, which is almost invariably and rapidly fatal. Eritptive Stage. In from 12 to 24 hours the eruption is noticed on the neck, chest, or back. The cheeks may be red, but this is not due to the characteristic rash. The nose, upper lip, and chin are not 47 affected. It appears first as minute dots or specks. These coalesce to form irregular patches, varying in size and shape and having irregular margins. The color is vermilion, scarlet, or bright red — ^like crushed raspberry, as contrasted with the crushed mulberry color seen in measles. In severe cases it is darker. ' At times the rash may resemble "goose-skin." The redness is most marked and remains longest in places where the skin is most delicate, as in the front of the arms and the inner sutface of the thighs. It disappears momentarily on pressure. Usually on the third day the rash reaches its maximum intensity and distribution, having extended over the rest of the body in a more continuous form, except, perhaps, on the extremities, where it appears in blotches or patches. Then, within a period varying from the fifth to the sixteenth day, it fades in much the same order as it appeared, and afterwards the skin begins to peel off in strips or flakes or large patches, or even in the form of gloves or slippers, from the hands and feet; on rare occasions the nails may be shed. The amount of peeling bears no relation to the intensity of the rash. The peeling may be repeated several times. The rash, in its appearance and spread, is not so regular as in smallpox and measles. When the throat conditions are very severe the rash may be mild, or even absent. During this stage the tongue is almost invariably white or greyish with red spots. Soon the tip and edges grow red and present a roughness or granular appearance. The appear- ance of the tongue is very characteristic of scarlet fever. The coating disappears usually about the fourth day, leaving the sur- face clean and reddened. When the papillae are enlarged, the appearance is like a ripe strawberry. The "strawberry tongue" is not always present ; but when it does occur it is distinctive of the disease. Mild cases of scarlet fever, with no perceptible eruption, but with sore throat, may occur; and it is generally believed that persons so affected may infect others with true scarlet fever of the ordinary types. The discovery and management of mild cases is a very important factor in the control of the disease. Complications. The most common and most serious complication is kidney disease, which often ends fatally and quickly, or sometimes en- tails lifelong trouble. This may occur as commonly in mild as in severe cases, and is independent of catching cold. It has no re- lation to the severity of the skin rash. Diseases of the ear are also common, and rheumatic affections of the joints are by no means rare. Swelling and suppuration of the glands of the neck may 48 occur, and the condition is then usually serious. Diphtheria sometimes develops during an. attack of scarlet fever. Eheuma- tism and various affections of the heart may follow. Isolation. In some places where hospital isolation has been practised the number of cases and the. death rate have both diminished. In this State the conditions appear to be such as to lead one to expect great general benefit from prompt isolation effectively carried out. At home, isolation should be complete. The sick-room should be dismantled of all unnecessary furniture and other articles, and no one allowed into it except the nurse or attendant. Other children should be withdrawn from school and, if possible, sent to some place where there are no other young people. Abun- dance of fresh air is of immense value in the treatment of patients, both in hospital and at home, and is very effective in preventing the spread of the disease. Disinfection. During sickness all discharges from the mouth, nose, and eyes should be received in gauze or handkerchiefs or similar cloths, which should be burned immediately. All articles used by the sick. person should be disinfected before removal from the sick- room, and then washed separately from articles used by other people. The disinfection of the sick-room after convalescence should be thorough and even more extensive than in the case of measles ; and to secure this it is necessary to call in the assistance of experts in the work of disinfecting. Return to School. As a rule, children may return to school about six weeks from the appearance of the rash, provided that there are no discharges from the mouth, npse, eyes, or glands. It is well, however, to keep a child strictly isolated from the children for eight or ten days after all symptoms have disappeared. Quarantine of the Exposed. This should extend to 14 days. 49 DIPHTHERIA. During the past 30 years 1,751 persons in this State have died from diphtheria. From the deaths recorded during that time, and the cases notified during the past 10 years, one sees that it is a disease that is always with us. Comjiared with scarlet fever it has a very high death rate. "Within the past 10 years the disease has greatly increased in this State as it has generally throughout the Commonwealth. The cause of this does not appear clear. The last 10-year period shows a reduction in the case mortality from the preceding 10-year period. The case mortality has been reduced from 87.7 to 43.7, but the actual deaths rose from 197 to 677 — an increase of 243.6 per cent. More than one factor may be concerned in this result ; and the subject is being investigated. An explanation is necessary here, in case the figures recording the numbers of cases and deaths should be misinterpreted. For some time it was customary for some medical practitioners to notify as cases of diphtheria all contacts who have been found to have the bacilli of diphthei-ia in their throats, whether they had any symptoms of the disease or not. But such persons, although notified, are not suffering from diphtheria, and they may not aquire the disease. Careful investigations have shown that in cities from 1 per cent, to 2 per cent, of all healthy persons among the general public have genuine diphtheria baciUi in their nose or throat, and from 8 per cent, to 50 per cent, of exposed persons in families and schools. These persons, though not themselves suffering from the disease, may infect others. They are known as "carriers." The carrier problem is a very difficult one, both scientifically and administratively, but it is one of great impor- tance in connection with the control of the disease. At the same time this should not divert attention from the spread by contact which is probably of greater importance than is imagined. A Committee on the Study and Prevention' of Communicable Diseases reported to the American Public Health Association in 1913, that "it is not practicable to isolate well persons infected with diphtheria bacilli, if such persons have not, so far as known, been recently exposed to the disease."; also that "it is not advisable as a matter of routine to isolate from the public all the well persons in infected families, schools, and institutions." Diphtheria occurs in country places as well as in towns. The disease spreads more slowly than measles or scarlet fever. Although, subject to a certain natural immunity in some persons, the disease may occur in people of any age, it is prin- cipally a disease of childhood. Most cases occur iu children between the second and seventh year of age. It is rare in early infancy, and is not common after the age of 10. It affects girls 50 and boys alike, and children with enlarged tonsils and adenoid growths in the throat are especially apt to acquire it. People living in damp houses would appear to be predisposed to it. There has not been found any immediate connection between this disease and imperfect drainage or sewer gas. Epidemics of dipht];ieria sometimes occur simultaneously with epidemics of measles, or typhoid fever, or follow epidemics of measles. A first attack of diphtheria does not confer any immunity. Infection. Infection clinging to shreds of material from the throat, nose, ear, or infected wounds, is carried usually directly by means of touch, kissing, and droplet infection ; or less commonly indirectly by contaminated clothing, handkerchiefs, books, toys, and such like. It appears to enter the system by the lining of the throat and upper air passages, and its entrance is favored by any local disease or abrasion of the lining of these parts. Sometimes shreds have been coughed into a person's eye or mouth, and so have started the disease. The infected material clings very closely to various articles, and may be conveyed to a great distance. Bad sanitary conditions may favor its spread, but do not appear to predispose people to the disease, except in so far as they lower their general vitality. The disease may be conveyed by milk and other foods. Pencils, pens, and other school apparatus will retain this infection for 24 hours. In one instance, in an orphanage in which diphtheria had occurred, a tooth-brush was found to con- tain large numbers of diphtheria bacilli. The range of infection is very linaited, apart from the conveyance by the agents men- tioned. People can be safe a few feet from the patient. It is therefore possible, with proper precautions, to treat a person safely at home. Incubation. The period of incubation varies from about 24 hours to a week. Most commonly it is from two to five days. It may be very short when the infection is inoculated directly. During this period there may be malaise and headache, and sometimes nausea and vomiting and chilly sensations, but not commonly any distinct chill. Invasion. There occur some sore throat, a slight fever, general weakness, and a feeling of soreness of the muscles. The tonsils are seen to be slightly swollen and reddened, and small greyish or yellowish spots covered by a thin membrane may be seen on the surface of one or both of the tonsils. In a few days these spots may enlarge and coalesce, and the membrane may cover the whole of the tonsils and spread to the palate and the back of the throat and to the nose. There may not be much pain, but there is usually difficulty in swallowing. The breath is fcetid. The tongue is coated and it may be swollen. Appetite disappears. There is usually swelling of the glands on each side of the lower jaw. If the membrane spreads downwards there is usually hoarseness, obstructed and noisy breathing, and a harsh ringing cough. The patient shows great distress, sits up in bed, or tosses about, gasp- ihg for breath. If pieces of the membrane are coughed up, there is a temporary relief. The disease has no definite duration, like typhoid or scarlet fever. It may last from 10 days to four weeks or longer. COMPUCATfONS. The commonest are diseases of the kidneys and paralysis. The paralysis may occur during the course of the illness or after con- valescence. Isolation. This has been referred to. If at home, the patient should be strictly isolated. All children should be sent away if possible ; if this is not possible, they should be kept away from the neighbor- hood of the sick room. • Disinfection. Everything used by the patient should be disinfected before removal from the room. The discharges should be received in gauze, or handkerchiefs, or similar cloths, which should be disin- fected or burned. The sick room and its contents should be dis- infected by officers of the board of health. Cases of diphtheria are very commonly removed to a hospital, and there is much to recommend this course when one considers how treacherous the disease is and how the necessity for surgical treatment' may arise very suddenly. Schools have been proved to play such a large part in the dis- semination of diphtheria that it is doubtful if the disease will be banished from the schools in the State until there is a complete system of general inspection by teachers, followed up by a system of special inspection of doubtful cases by medical officers and a thoroughly trained staff of disinfectors whose services will be available at the patients' homes. Eeturn to School. This will be possible after three weeks if the patient is strong enough, and if there is no discharge from the nose, eyes, or ears. Nowadays it is recommended that children should be kept from school until materials from the throat and nose, t-aken not less than 24 hours apart, show no cultures of the bacilli that cause the disease. Quarantine op the Exposed. This should extend to 12 days, or until bacilli are not found in the throat or nose. 52 Table of Principal Communicable Diseases in South Australia, 1889-1918.* Year. Whooping Cough. Measles. Scarlet Fever. Diphtheria. Cases. Deaths. Cases. Deaths. Cases. Deaths. Cases. Deaths. 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 : 2 129 42 12 121 60 44 17 112 ~ 1 . 1 261 28 2 54 — 1 3 4 2 5 35 10 4 7 15 109 174 173 106 100 97 37 21 22 38 Ten Years— 1889-1898 — 539 — 347 / 86 — 877 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 — 106 29 51 36 60 25 6 16 73 18 — 27 2 5 235 5 1 5 14 986 254 115 120 749 529 451 852 403 75 16 1 19 10 8 12 5 624 400 313 267 292 302 126 150 132 213 40 32 19 27 21 18 7 12 13 8 Ten Years— 1899-1908 — 420 — 294 4,534 76 2,819 197 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 970 1,100 2,193 672 265 1,801 781 690 16 34 32 3 64 ' 49. 2 «5 29 5 261 227 8,589 564 1,063 2,023 6,163 4,490 321 288 17 17 23 8 34 20 1 1 128 134 75 679 300 169 214 266 238 665 2 2 12 7 2 1 1 1 9 430 1,604 1,076 1,141 1,185 996 651 1,669 1,257 1,469 15 37 61 55 70 58 64 144 87 86 Ten Years— 1909-1918 ' 9,064 289 22,989 121 2,868 37 11,378 677 * Note. — During these 30 years the population of the State increased by 25 per cent. 53 "CONTACT DISEASES" OR "SCHOOL DISEASES." The diseases whooping-oough, measles, scarlet fever, and diphtheria constitute a group with certain features in common that give them a peculiar interest. They are sometimes known as contact diseases, not that they are transmitted solely by direct or indirect contact, nor that other diseases are not also transmitted in this way ; but because, on the whole, contact, either immediate from person to person, or mediate by contaminated articles, plays by far the largest part in their spread. Among all the diseases that are spread by contact these possess for us by far the greatest interest, and are the most entensive and deadly with which we have to deal in daily life. These diseases are sometimes also known as the school diseases, not that they are limited in their occurrence to infection caught in school or that they are the only communicable diseases that occur among children attending school; but because in the vast majority of cases they affect children of school age who may for the first time in their susceptible lives be exposed to them, and because even where, as in England, school conditions of living are good compared with home conditions, schools are proved to be the chief means in their spread, while in places where the home conditions are good compared with overcrowded schools these diseases are still more extensively spread through the medium of public chools and similar institutions. "Contact Diseases" or "School Diseases" in South Australia, 1889-1918.* When Not Notifiable. When Notifiable. Disease. Number of Years. Annual Average of Deaths. Number of Years. Annual Average of Deaths. Whooping Cough Measles .*^carlet Fever 20 20 10 10 47-9 320 8-6 87-7 10 10 20 20 28-9 10-1 .5-6 Diphtheria f 43-7 * Note. — During these thirty years the population of the State increased by 25 per cent. t On the subject of Diphtheria death rates see p. 49. 54 Neither the nomenclature nor the classification is strictly- scientific, for there is no exact scientific classification possible of any groups of diseases; but either of the designations, "con- tact" or "school", has the practical advantage of keeping con- stEintly before our minds the particular and prominent charac- teristics that have to be reckoned with in all our attempts to deal with these diseases. Briefly what has to be realised is that in each of these four diseases the organism, or virus, as the case may be, exists in the human body, that outside the body it does not develop or grow but only lives, and that, too, for a relatively short time, until it either dies or finds suitable soil in another susceptible human body ; further that the organism or the virus is given off in the secretions of the nose, mouth, and respiratory passages, and enters other human bodies by these channels. While schools usually form a ready field for the spread of infection, they also in many instances may be made a very helpful means in the prevention of epidemics. In Boston, Mass., in 1894, Commissioner Durgin introduced school medical inspection in order to check an epidemic of diphtheria. A few years later New York City and Philadelphia adopted the same practice. The daily visitation of every school by the school doctor or trained school nurse, the inspection of the children, the inquiries into absences, and the method of dealing with pupils from infected houses re- ported by the Department of Health, and home isolation of infected children, and the active disinfection connected with this, are measures that have combined in New York to reduce epidemics to an extent that is little short of marvellous. On an average less than 1 per cent, of children per annum have been necessarily excluded from school on account of infectious disease. Dr. Josephine Baker, the Director of the Bureau of Child Hygiene in New York, says: — "Such control may be exercised in any community, and the school, instead of being the focus for the dissemination of communicable diseases, may become, because of its very adaptability to control, one of the most valuable methods we have of limiting the spread of communicable diseases in any community." It is to be noted that in New York the medical inspection of schools is under the Department of Health, and this is generally recognised as a necessary arrangement to ensure satisfactory work. In country districts the method of control by constant and continued daily inspection of school children is seldom applicable on account of the cost it would entail. This illustrates the fact, too often forgotten or ignored, that no one plan of control wiU apply everywhere or at all times. Misconception or misrepresen- tation of any plan of action, or single act, is unfortunately easy. A classroom, for instance, is closed in a country school on account of a case of measles, and the contacts are excluded for some 55 •days. One is told that the eommittee of the Massachusetts Association of Boards of Health reported that "Schools should not be closed during an epidemic of diphtheria. ' ' The remainder ■of the sentence in the report may not be quoted. It reads: •* ' Daily inspection and culturing will achieve better results. ' ' It must never be forgotten that not only do the precautions and measures of control vary in the different diseases and in diffe- rent places, but they may have to be changed during the course •of an epidemic in one locality. A time may come, for example, in the history of an outbreak of measles when the healthy may "be excluded from school and the convalescents and the immune allowed to return. In dealing above with the spread of whooping cough, measles, ■scarlet fever, and diphtheria, repeated reference has been made to infection by direct contact with the patient and also to droplet infection.* It is difficult, however, to grasp the fact that infective material may easily pass from one person to another by means of secre- tions from the nose and mouth. Without inquiry we give a sort ■of intellectual assent to the possibility of infection by the^e means. But when we study and observe, what strikes us is not the possibility that some persons may be so infected; we are ■filled with wonder how any susceptible person can escape — if any such person actually does escape. There are other methods, however, by which infection can be •conveyed by secretions of the nose and mouth. These demand •careful consideration. In writing on the subject of infection by contact with saliva, Dr. Charles V. Chapin, Superintendent of Health, Providence, E..I., urges that if contact infection is important in diseases like typhoid fever, dysentery, and cholera, in which the infecting material is not constantly at hand, and is usually strenuously avoided, this mode of transference is of much greater importance in diseases 'in which the specific germs are found in the secretions ■of the nose and mouth or ia the sputum. The following extracts will give an idea of the position : — "Probably the chief vehicle for the conveyance of nasal and ■oral secretion from one to another is the fingers. If one takes the trouble to watch for a short time his neighbors, or even him- self, unless he has been particularly traiued in such matters, he * The subject of "droplet infection" has been mentioned above in con- nection with the spread of infection in whooping cough, measles, scarlet ^fever, and diphtheria. It is referred to at some length, with illustrative facts, in Bulletin No. 1 "On Cleansing and Disinfection in the Control of Infectious Diseases" (Adelaide: R. E. E. Rogers, Government Printer, 1917). 56 will be surprised to note the number of times that the fingers ga to the mouth and the nose. Not only is the saliva made use of for a great variety of purposes, and numberless articles are for one reason or another placed in the mouth, but for no reason whatever, and all unconsciously, the fingers are with great fre- quency raised to the lips or the nose. "Who can doubt that if the salivary glands secreted indigo the fingers would continually be stained a deep blue, and who can doubt that if the nasal and oral secretions contain the germs of disease these germs will be almost as constantly found upon the fingers? All successful commerce is reciprocal, and in this universal trade in human saliva the fingers not only bring foreign secretions to the mouth of their owner, but there exchanging them for his own, distri- bute the latter to everything that the hand touches. This- happens not once, but scores and hundreds of times during the day's round of the individual. The cook spreads his saliva on the muffins and rolls, the waitress infects the glasses and spoons, the moistened fingers of the peddler arrange his fruit, the thumb of the milkman is in his measure, the reader moistens the pages of his book, the conductor his transfer tickets, the 'lady' the fingers of her glove. Everyone is busily engaged in this dis- tribution of saliva, so that the end of each day finds this secretion freely distributed on the doors, window sills, furniture and play- things in the home, the straps of trolley cars, the rails and coun- ter and desks of shops and public buildings, and indeed upon everything that the hands of man touch. "What avails it if the pathogens do die so quickly?' A fresh supply is furnished each day Besides the moistening of the fingers with saliva and the use of the common drinking cup, the mouth is put to numberless improper uses which may result in the spread of infection. It is used to hold pins, string, pencils, paper and money. The lips are used to moisten the pencil, to point the thread for the needle, to wet postage stamps and envelopes. Chil- dren 'swap' apples, cake, and lollipops, while men exchange their pipes, and women hatpins. Sometimes the mother is seen 'cleansing' the face of her child with her saliva-moistened hand- kerchief, and perhaps the visitor is shortly after invited to kiss: the little one. ' ' Children have no instinct of cleanliness, and their faces, hands, toys, clothing, and everything that they touch must of necessity be continually daubed with the secretions of the nose and mouth. It is well known that between the ages of two and eight y6ars children are more susceptible to scarlet fever, diphtheria, measles; and whooping cough than at other ages, and it may be that one reason for this is the great opportunity that is afforded by their habits at these ages for the transfer of the secretions. Infants do not of course mingle freely with one another, and' 57 older children do not come in such close contact in their play, and they also begin to have a little idea of cleanliness. ' ' Besides the saliva there is another source and mode of infec- tion, and one that is generally overlooked in measles, scarlet fever, and diphtheria. This is the discharge from the ear that often occurs during the course of the disease, and remains after the patient is regarded as convalescent, or even as quite well. The discharge in these cases often remains virulent for a con- siderable time. One instance is recorded in which a case was discharged from hospital in the thirteenth week of the disease, and a brother of the patient died of scarlet fever before the in- fected child was a week home from the hospital. Discharges also containing pus from other parts of the body than the ear, may spread infection in these diseases. From the facts here set forth it will be abundantly evident that in schools, and especially in overcrowded schools, all the factors are present for the facile spread of infection in the case of whoop- ing cough, measles ,and scarlet fever. Diphtheria may also be included. A careful study of recent statistics of "home infec- tion" shows that the spread of infection in these diseases from a sick person to other members of the family, or from one family to another, except by actual contact with the infected person or the infective material, is a rare event compared with the rapid and wide spread of infection that occurs in schools, public institu- tions, camps, public meetings, and similar congregations. It is facts like these that are rousing educational and health authorities to take stringent measures against the spread of diseases that have now been proved to be controllable. Measles, which was for a long time regarded as beyond the scope of almost any practicable measures of control, is now receiving the con- sideration that it urgently calls for, considered as a practically universal disease with a high mortality and an extensive and varied disablement of a permanent or temporary character. In 1913 Dr. Frederick S. Crum, Statistician to the Prudential Insurance Company of America, wrote: — "Authorities have in the past been in disagreement as to the benefits of compulsory notification of measles but those opposed to notification have been so because of practical difficulties in the form of expense, lack of sufficiently large health departmental staffs, lack of hos- pital accommodation for isolation of patients, &c. Presumably, however, there is quite general agreement that notification of eases of measles must be a preliminary requirement, and a neces- sary part of any complete program for the better control of measles. The best modern practice seems to be that whereby co-operation is effected between parents, school teachers, medical inspectors of schools, visiting nurses and health departments." Evidence of a sane and sanitary campaign on these lines is 58 afforded in a recent report issued by the Local Government Board, England (1919, New Series, No. 115), dealing with "Measures for the Prevention of Mortality and Disablement due to Measles and Pneumonia in Children." When one understands (1) the possibility of an infected per- son infecting another before he himself shows symptoms of ill- ness; (2) the conditions under which the infection of measles- spreads by contact and droplet infection; and (3) the frequent serious and permanent consequences to the survivors, one sees the necessity for prompt and effective measures in dealing with every case of the disease. The following brief statement of administra- tive action in England is bound to prove encouraging. By a recent order of the Local Government Board, every local authority is empowered to provide nursing as well as medical' attendance for all necessary eases of measles in its district. Further, the visiting of children suffering from measles is alsa part of infant welfare work, and the Government Board is also to give grants to help in providing health visitors for this pur- pose; and if the arrangements are satisfactory the board allow a grant of 50 per cent, for this work and for nursing. The routine work of the nurse consists in prompt visiting, in- quiring as to other eases, taking precautions, giving directions,, instructing as to nursing, looking after clothing, ventilation, dis- infection, healthiness of the house — in short, evers^thing that has to do with the child's and family's welfare. She reports to the medical officer, and continues her visits, twice daily at first, until the child is convalescent. The board's memorandum says regard- ing nursing provision : — ' ' There can be no doubt that this is of first importance for preventing mortality and disablement result- ing from measles. The mortality among the working classes from measles is very much greater than among the middle and upper classes, mainly on account of the absence of proper care of the children during the acute stages of the disease. . . . The cleansing of the skin, and the maintaining of the mouth and throat in as aseptic a condition as possible are of the first im- portance, also the nursing of complications such as bronchitis and pneumonia." The memorandum points out that where the children are not removed to hospital, nursing must be provided at home. The most convenient ways of providing nursing in England have been the engaging the nurses of a District Nursing Asso- ciation or employing the nurses of the sanitary authorities isolation hospital staff; also by a number of adjacent local authorities combining to engage the services of a permanent nurse. In some epidemics the services of the school nurses are 59 employed; in one case the workshop inspector, a trained nurse, was engaged. Sometimes the teachers of schools that have been closed have been employed as visitors to assist. In some cases "mothers' helps" have been employed by the local authorities to assist in the home nursing of measles cases. It is laid down that every case of measles should be seen by a doctor, and that he should advise and supervise the nurse or other attendant. These and other measures of control and treatment are far from being unnecessary when the serious nature of measles is con- sidered. In the first place, measles is an almost universal disease of civilisation. It can scarcely be said that any person is immune to it. This means the vast majority of the population in present conditions of administration will suffer from the disease. The death rate from measles should cause even the most casual to think. In public institutions the fatality is high. In one epidemic in an institution affecting 294 children, nearly half being under 2 years of age, the mortality was 30 per cent. In two epidemics in an institution in New York the fatality was 35 per cent. Apart from institutions the mortality is large. A study of nine years' compulsory notification of measles in Edinburgh shows that the "case mortality" for all ages was not less than f fA per cent. The mortality in private houses varies in proportion i to the crowded condition of the rooms and the lack of facilities for isolation of healthy individuals. The mortality varies with age, as has been noted above. Desirable Remedial Measures. The memorandum of the Local Government Board says the following remedial measures stand out as likely to favor a reduction in the mortality and disablement due to measles : — 1. Efforts to prevent the risk of infection amongst the young, with a view to the postponement of the incidence of measles until after 5 years of age. 2. The special guarding of all ailing and delicate children from measles infection. 3. Precautions directed against the outbreak and spread of measles in children's institutions. 4. Measures directed towards the improvement of housing conditions with special reference to hygiene, ventilation, and the diminution of overcrowding. 5. Measures directed towards the reduction of the general infantile mortality. 6. The securing of skilled medical and nursing treatment for cases of measles in the patients' own homes. 7. The provision of efficient hospital treatment for necessitous cases of measles. 60 8. The prevention of complications of measles. 9. Medical observation and treatment of the child after the attack of measles, with a view to the prevention of sequelse. The problem of the possibility of successful scientific and administrative control of measles has been solved. Munson has the best grounds for saying that the death rate may be reduced to a practically negligible factor. In England and Wales alone during the three years 1911-13 the notifiable diseases, viz., smallpox, scarlet fever, diphtheria, typhoid fever, puerperal fever, and erysipelas caused 31,641 deaths. Measles, which is partially notifiable, killed 36,627 people, i.e., 15 per cent, more than all the others together. The people are now thinking that the problem of practical control is worth considering, from the point of view of economics, if from no other. 61 TYtHOID FEVER. Typhoid fever is one of the most widely distributed of the com- municable diseases. It ranges from the arctic regions to the tropics. It may be looked upon as essentially a disease of youth, as contrasted with whooping cough and measles, which are characteristically diseases of childhood. About four-fifths of all cases of typhoid fever occur between the fifteenth and the thirty- fifth year of age, and more than half between the fifteenth and the twenty-fifth year. After the fiftieth year and before the end of the first year it is rare. Among children more boys are attacked than girls. In England the disease occurs most commonly in the summer months. The same is true of this State. Most eases occur in February, March, and April; occasionally a large epidemic may occur in May^ and also in January. Speaking generally, filth is the origin of typhoid fever; food, flies, dust, and dirty hands are its vehicles of spread. It is a poor satisfaction for a sufferer to know that it may have been his neighbor's or somebody else's filth that gave him the disease. The community must help the individual in his endeavors to avoid this disease. The infective material leaves the human body in the evacua- tions of the bowels, in the urine, and exceptionally in materials thrown out in vomiting, coughing, spitting, and sneezing. The infection may directly, or through the medium of flies or dust, contaminate water, ice, milk, butter, shellfish, vegetables, fruit — in fact, all sorts of food and drink. When it is dried it will retain its virulence for several months, so also when it is mixed with ' boiled milk, aerated waters, distilled or sterilised drinking water. In natural drinking water, especially when it is moving and exposed to sunlight, the infective material usually loses its activity. Infection derived from the excreta may cling to house- hold articles, such as bedding, clothing, linen, and towels for a considerable time. Third persons may also be the means of conveying infection from the diseased to the healthy. Lavatory railway ears have been blamed in America for spreading typhoid fever, and the dry earth closet has been recom- mended on the cars instead of the water closet. It would prevent soiling of the road bed, and be inoffensive. In hospitals the disease sometimes spreads from patients to the nurses and other attendants through lack of attention to details of cleanliness and disinfection. It is now recognised that the frequency with which cases of typhoid • fever originate in a hospital can be taken as an index of its hygienic arrangements 62 and the organisation of the medical and nursing service. A single inexperienced or careless attendant may upset the hest regula- tions, with widespread and disastrous effects. The same remark applies to cases in private houses. Typhoid fever does not generally attack large districts at once, or a whole city, unless, of course, the general water supply should he contaminated. The disease usually shows itself in single cases or small groups, or in street epidemics. Typhoid fever occurs perhaps most commonly among well nourished young individuals living in healthy surroundings. The rich suffer quite as much as, and even more than, the poor. Once the disease has broken out in an overcrowded locality, where drainage and arrangements for the disposal of nightsoil are defective, it will spread faster than where hygienic conditions obtain ; but insanitary conditions in themselves do not predispose to the occurrence of the disease. People suffering from typhoid fever may be sufficiently well to walk about, and may show few, if any, symptoms of illness. Further, people who have passed through an attack and have quite recovered may discharge the infection from their bodies for months of even years. Only general sanitatipn will prevent an outbreak from thede "ambulatory cases" and "typhoid carriers" as they are called. , . In this State typboid fever is spread by excreta from cesspools, and leaking or overfilled privy pans percolating through the sub- soil into wells and underground tanks; from contaminated dust being blown into uncovered tanks, both under and above ground ; and by flies, especially in houses near cattle-yards, carrying infec- tion to food and drink. Predisposing causes are recognised — such as illhealth, pro- longed anxiety, lack of exercise, overwork, monotony of di^t, ^indigestion, especially gastric disorders accompanied by a loath- ing for fo&d and an absence of the natural acids of the stomach, and exposure to foul air and other insanitary conditions in sub- jects not accustomed to such. The more healthily a person has lived in sanitary surroundings the more likely he may be to suffer when he first comes into con- tact with or lives in insanitary conditions. This is often evi- denced in persons going from cities to the goldfields. One attack very often confers immunity for a lifetime, but second attacks are sometimes met with. It is not known whether the mildriess of a first attack renders one more liable to a second. Third and fourth attacks " occur, but are most exceptional. Since typhoid fever attacks persons mostly at an age when their economic value to the community is greatest, the economic loss is immense. It has been Calculated that in America the money loss through this disease is £20,000,000 annually. 63 Infection. The disease is eommunicable from the time of the first appear- ance of symptoms, sometimes even before the fever, and until the -typhoid bacilli are absent from the body discharges — ^usually, at the time of convalescence; but they may continue to be dis- charged in the faeces, the urine, and in pus from abscesses, even for years after health is restored. Persons also may be "car- riers" of the infection of typhoid fever who give no history of laving ever suffered from the disease. The disease has been produced experimentally through the medium of the bites of laed bugs. With the possible exception of infection by way of the lungs, the infective material enters the system, only by one portal — "the alimentary tract — by the agency of food and drink, by dust, and by contaminated hands. Incubation. The period of incubation is usually from 10 to 14 days. It may vary from seven to 23 days. During the incubation period there may be languor, headache, disturbed sleep, night sweats, and impaired appetite. Invasion. The stage of invasion, which is not sharply defined, is reckoned to begin with the marked appearance of fever. It may last from two or three days to two weeks. The symptoms usually appear gradually. Slight chilliness, or repeated chilliness, is often noticed; and this distinguishes typhoid fever from other infectious fevers, in which a single chill usually marks the begin- ning. Exertion causes fatigue, sleep is light and disturbed, the appetite fails, there are occasional abdominal pains, nausea, a coated tongue, which soon becomes dry, severe headache, weary aching in the limbs, and sometimes dullness of hearing, and a feeling of roaring in the ears. In children the symptoms of the ■disease may appear suddenly. The patient is listless and apathetic, and lies with eyes closed, as if asleep ; the cheeks are reddened; the skin feels hot and dry; delirium may occur at night; appetite is lost, but thirst is present; the abdomen is -usually full. Sometimes there is cough, and not infrequently Heeding from the nose occurs. Towards the end of the first week, or at the beginning of the second, the characteristic rose spots appear. They are to be seen first upon the abdomen, the back, and the lower part of the ■chest. They may also be found on the thighs and upper arms. 'They do not occur on the face. They appear in successive ■crops, and the number varies greatly and bears no relation to the intensity of the fever or the severity of the disease. Each spot is small, slightly raised, and rose-oolored, and varies in size from a pinhead to a lentil. The color disappears on pressure, but returns almost immediately. Sometimes one finds instead 64 of rose spots, blue spots about the size of a split pea. These may be seen in the situations where the rose spots usually occur. During the second week the symptoms are intensified. Torpor and somnolence become more marked. Delirium continues, the patient remains in a continuous stupor, the tongue becomes red down the middle and at the sides, it is protruded slowly and is. tremulous. The face looks drawn, it loses its former reddish appearance and becomes pale. The mouth is partly open,, exposing the upper teeth, which, like the lips, are covered with "sordes" — dry, dark crusts. The voice is weak, and may be hoarse. Dry cough is sometimes troublesome. The symptoms persist during the third week, after which a gradual improvement usually sets in. The mind clears up, the tongue becomes moist, appetite returns, and about the fifth or sixth week the patient is convalescent. Complications. Bed sores may occur and prove troublesome. Abscesses are not uncommon in some epidemics. Hsemorrrhage from the bowels may occur. Parotiditis, resembling mumps, is sometimes seen,, and then suppuration oi the glands usually occurs. Perforation of the intestines, when it occurs, is usually, though not invariably^ fatal. Isolation. In hospitals, cases of typhoid fever are often treated in the general medical wards, and there is no reason why this should not be done. The custom gives nurses and students opportunities of study that might not otherwise be available to them. If the patient is treated at home he should be isolated in a room by himself. The room should be cleared of all unnecessary furniture and furnishings. The room should be fly proof. Disinfection. Everything used by the patient should be disinfected before being removed from the room. All discharges should be received into strong disinfecting solutions. Every precaution must be taken to prevent any utensil from being used for other persons without being disinfected. No person attending the sick, in fact, no person living in the same house, should milk cows or have anything to do with dairy work. Eetuen to School. As a rule children will be able to return to school as soon as strength is recovered after convalescence, provided that no typhoid bacilli are found in the body discharges. Quarantine of the Exposed. This should extend to 28 days. 65 INFLUENZA. For many hundred years past a strange disease has from time to time appeared in various places on the habitable globe, has spread_ widely and usually rapidly, has devastated whole countries, killing multitudes, and causing much permanent iU- Ihealth among jthe survivors, and then has seemed to die out, only to re-appear, perhaps, several times in the course of the next •century. No other disease has ever been so widely diffused. So strange was it in its mode, or modes, of origin, so unaccountable in fts methods of spread, and so often associated with strange meteorological or other phenomena, that its cause was suspected io be some peculiar stellar or telluric "influence." Hence it was named "Influenza." But it had, and still has, many other names. About 40 of ihese might be enumerated. Some of these names have been given to it on account of the way in which the disease seizes its victims, e.g., La Grippe and Blitz-katarrh ; others on account of the bodily symptoms to which it gives rise, e.g., Pebris eatarrhalis (catarrhal fever) ; others because of the manner in which it has T)een supposed to spread, e.g., Catarrhus ' a contagio — catarrh from contact; others from certain peculiarities that have at- tracted attention, e.g., Schaffhusten and Huhner-weh, from the peculiar character of the cough; others from some incidental feature seen during the epidemic, e.g., Coqueluche, because the sick wore a close cap over their heads ; others from the name of the country in which it appeared or from which it spread, e.g., the Germans and Italians called it the Russian disease, a name also given to it by the English in 1889; the Russians called it €hinese catarrh ; the French call it Spanish catarrh or Spanish influenza, the last being the general name by which it is known in the present epidemic. Although epidemics have shown great variation in their origin, ■course, and minor manifestations, they have usually presented much the same broad features since the time when the disease T)ecame the subject of systematic study. No class of persons can "be said to have been exempt from the ravages of 'this disease. The very old have usually been the most severe sufferers, ■although in some epidemics the disease has proved serious to very young children. It would appear that certain types are associated with patients at particular ages. Outbreaks may occur suddenly and simultaneously in many isolated places, and have occurred even in vessels that have been at sea for from three to four weeks. The spread is usually rapid — as fast as the speed of human traffic — and often mysterious. The complications may 66 be dangerous. The mortality may be very great. The after- effects of the disease may be many, various, severe, and long con- tinuing. An attack confers no immunity on an individual; ia fact, it would sometimes appear that a person when once affected became more liable to another attack. The lower animals as well as human beings may suffer from the disease. An epidemic in any given locality usually subsides in a few weeks, but it may light up again in a few months or reappear- after a longer interval. The discovery by Pfeiffer in 1892 of a germ associated with the malady, promised to east light on many of the problems of the origin and spread of the disease that formerly were insoluble. Certain observations and investigations made during the present epidemic, however, show that the bacteriology of the disease pre- sents many difficulties. The association of Pfeiffer 's bacillus with the disease is not the simple matter it appeared to be a few years ago. It may be that Pfeiffer 's bacillus, when found in the secretions of healthy persons, may resemble the diphtheria bacillus in that it may spread the disease to others without infecting the "carrier." It may be, again, that Pfeiffer 's; bacillus, although not detectable by microscopic examination in,, or in cultures from, the secretions of diseased persons, may still be present in these secretions, but may be "masked" or "over- grown" by other micro-organisms that are commonly found tO' be present. And it may be that the germ, or virus, that causes, influenza has not yet been isolated. In a memorandum issued by the English Local Government Board the position is set forth thus : — ' ' It is still an open question whether Pfeiffer 's bacillus is the specific cause of Influenza, or- whether in relation to this disease it occupies a position analogous to that of the pneumoeoccus or streptococcus, though perhaps a more important cause than these of the secondary complications: of Influenza. In view of the above considerations, it is impossible to set up an unerring bacteriological test for Influenza, and its; clinical symptoms are so multiform as not to permit of a dif- ferential clinical diagnosis in all cases. The one distinctive feature of the disease is its occasional occurrence in epidemics: and in world--wide pandemics. It is impracticable, however, to- base a diagnosis of this characteristic ; for it would exclude cases occurring in the intervals of an epidemic, and ordinary non- influenzal cattarrhs would be included. For the present it must remain uncertain to what extent severe catarrhs' or febrile attacks without catarrh occurring in inter-epidemic J)eriods are true Influenza ; and whether when Influenza becomes widely pre- valent this occurs as the result of increased virulence of disease already prevalent or by introduction from some unkno-wn focus of a new strain of disease. Attack by Influenza enhances the virulence of pneumococci and streptococci — previously present 67 possibly as harmless saprophytes — and much of the mischief caused by Influenza is due to this. We are ignorg,nt as to the causes which lead to the occasional world-wide spread of In- fluenza. ' ' Prophylaxis.. Until the true cause of the disease is scientifically known, the employment of an;^ prophylactic would be founded on an em- pirical basis. The difficulties of logical medical investigation in any given case are' numerous and arduous, and rarely is the con- clusion scientifically justified from the premises. In reference to influenza it ought to be said that in not a few epidemics there is ground for believing that quinine in doses of 2 grains every morning has been useful in preventing people from taking the disease. Apart from this, one cannot say that any other drug has been really found useful, except in so far as the taking of it gave the taker a quiet mind, and reminded him or her to avoid infection by contact. On the subject of vaccines against influenza, it is generally acknowledged that until the true germ or virus of the disease has been scientifically established, the use of any vaccine would be altogether experimental. On this subject the Department of Public Health of the United States in November, 1918, issued the following cautionary advice : — ' ' In view of the exaggerated, and in some respects misleading, statements that have jippeared In the public press regarding the value of bacterial vaccines in the prevention and treatment of infltienza and the pneumonias which so often complicate it, the following statement is made: The evidence that has been presented thus far does not warrant the reposing of confidence in any infiuenza vaccine for either pro- phylactic or therapeutic purposes. . . At present ^t can be said that vaccines may be used in a purely experimental way, and pains should be taken to collect data on the incidence of the disease among both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. ' ' Infection. Whatever may be the particular germ, or the special association, of germs that gives rise to the disease, several facts may be deemed settled, or several suppositions may be considered as highly pro- bable regarding infection. The ipfective matter may be con- veyed from one person to another by bed clothes, towels, handkerchiefs, cups, spoons, and such-like means; by droplets of moisture in the air which are being continually thrown off in sneezing, coughing, , speaking, and singing; and by shaking hands, kipsing, or other modes of personal contact. Infection occurs most probably by way of the nose, throat, and lungs. It may be made easier if the individual exposed is suffering from an ordinary cough or cold. Persons living or 68 working in overheated and badly ventilated rooms are predis- posed to infection. The .disease is spread by actual contact with, or by the secretions of, persons who are sick, or who, though not sick, are "influenza carriers"; and it is usually caught in overheated and badly ventilated rooms, places of amusement, schools, churches, factories, railway carriages, and tramcars. Climate in itself, or season, does not appear to have much influence. Overcrowding in homes, places of amusement, schools, churches, factories, prisons, railway carriages, and tramcars is one of the most powerful factors in the spread of the disease, even where- none of the persons present may be obviously ill. In every epidemic the dangerous and unrecognisable "influenza carrier" may be everywhere about, and is all the more effective in spreading mis- chief because he is a quite unconscious agent in the process. Avoidance. The practical advice to follow is: — Avoid all crowded places. Breathe through your nose. "Within 3ft. of a person you are decidedly in the danger zone. When coughing or sneezing never, on any account, omit to turn your head aside and to put a handkerchief before your face. Do not speak directly in a person's face, or allow anyone to speak directly in yours, in case the droplets of moisture in the breath should carry infection. Wash your hands and face often, not so much to make them clean as to keep them clean. Do not use another person's towel, napkin, spoon, fork, drinking cup or glass unless it. has first been washed. Have your house and room well ventilated. Live always in fresh air, and as much as possible in the open air and sunshine.. Walk to your work if possible. Avoid fatigue. Bat good nourishing food in proper quantity. Avoid persons who may have been in a possibly infected place. Keep away from any place that may be infected. Avoid people who have ' ' a cold. ' ' Keep away from everybody if you have a cold. If you are struck by a chill, pains in the head, eyes, back or elsewhere, aching, feverishness, giddiness, nausea, or prostration — whether you have "a cold" or not, and whether or not there is influenza about — go to bed at once, send for a doctor, and until he comes f-emain as strictly isolated as possible. Incubation. The period of incubation, that is, the time between the entrance of the "germ," or of its products, into the system and the first manifestation of symptoms, is usually from three to four" days, oftenest perhaps two ; but it may be no more than one day, and 69 it may even be only an hour or two. There may be no symptoms of any sort during this stage. Invasion. The invasion of the disease, that is, the appearance of symptoms, is usually abrupt. It may be almost "apoplectic" in its suddenness. The sufferer may be struck with chill and acute frontal headache, with pains in the small of the back, or with general aching with giddiness and nausea and depression. Vomiting, diarrhoea, or abdominal pain may be present. There may be running at the nose and eyes; suffusion of the eyes, drooping of the upper eyelids, squint; cough, sore throat, high temperature, sleeplessness, prostration, or great debility. Bleed- ing from the nose may occur. In some very acute cases the symptoms may subside in about three days. In most cases, how- ever, th'ey persist for about a week, when the patient becomes convalescent. Weakness, sometimes of a profound character, may be experienced for several days after getting up. Complications. Almost every epidemic shows some peculiarities in its character or in its complications during some period in its course. Like the European epidemic of 1889, the present epidemic is charac- terised by a large amount of cases in which pneumonia occurs, and causes very serious symptoms. In some epidemics a study has been made of the influence of the disease upon patients in hospital who were under treatment for other diseases. It was found that consumption made more rapid progress; diabetes became intensified; chronic kidney disease became acute; epileptics had more fits than usual; heart disease became complicated by other conditions. The after-effects, or sequelae, of influenza have often been veiy pronounced, such as neuralgia, neuritis, heart weakness, sleep- lessness, mental disorders with suicidal tendencies. Almost every epidemic has been characterised by some dominant sort of sequelfe, which may be more serious than the original or the primary disease. One of the commonest, however, has been muscular rheumatism, which may occur for the first time after an attack of influenza, and may persist for many years. Isolation. The patient should be put to bed at once and the doctor called. Isolation should be on the same lines as for diphtheria, and should be complete. Early bed helps isolation, it means rest, and it appears to be the best preventive of a "serious" or "dangerous" form of the illness and of a relapse. The patient should be kept 70 io ,lpe(i for at least three or four days after the fever has gone. The sick room should be a warm, open room, with as much sun- light and fresh air as possible. It should be forbidden ground to everyone but the nurse and the doctor. All attendants on the sick should wear masks. Isolation, it should be noted, does not mean geographical separation so much as the establishment of barriers against the passage of infected material from the patient to other persons. Treatment in hospital is to be preferred, if obtainable. If carried out at home, the patient's bed may be out of doors, say, in a sheltered part of a verandah. Everything that has been used by the patient should be disinfected before being used by others or else destroyed. Disinfection. The directions for the management of the sick room and disin- fection laid down in the chapter on "The Sick Room and Disin- fection." Whether the patient is the "first case" in the house- hold or not, every precaution should be taken against the spread of the disease in the house and from the house. If it is the first case in the district, the responsibility of effective control is all the greater ; for in the case of an epidemic of disease of this sort he is best his own friend who is his brother's keeper. n CONSUMPTION. A Notable Subject. Consumption, or tuberculosis, has come to be known as "the great white pla^e." It "claims more victims, produces more misery, is destructive of more happiness, creates more poverty, and interferes with the public weal to a greater extent than any other disease ever known to man." But while it has been the cause of so much mental and bodily suffering, it has, at the same time, been the occasion of the display of such mental forti- tude as almost to be one of the most potent moral forces in ancient or modern times. Many of the world's most eminent men and women have been consumptives — among writers, Laurence Sterne, Smollett, Heine, J. Stuart Mill, Thoreau, Artemus Ward, Eobert Louis Stevenson; among poets, Schiller, John Keats, Henry Kirke White, Shelley, E. B. Browning, Thomas Hood; among philosophers, Descartes, Spinoza; among "stage stars," Rachel and many another ; among musicians, Chopin, Mozart, and von Weber ; among physicians, Bayle, Andrew Combe, and An- drew Clarke. When we think how much of the world's best litera- ture and art we owe to the lives— and to the sufferings — of men and women such as these, we must feel something else than pas- sive contempt for persons — ^we can't call them men or women — who would treat aU consumptives as worse than pariahs and no better than lepers, granting them a right to die, with assis- tance in the act if permissible, but denying them their right to live except in physical and moral isolation. A strong antidote is wanted to much of the fashionable medico-moral poison that is being circulated at the present time regarding the rights of consumptives. Consumption — Ancient and Modern. A disease like consumption could not avoid being the object of much careful observation and inquiry. Hippocrates, the father of medicine, who lived over 2,000 years ago, knew a great deal about consumption from careful observation. He states that the commonest age for its appearance is from 18 to 25 years. He has described the spit, the locality of the pain, the characteristic features of the breathing and the cough, the condition of the skin and nails, the sweats, diarrhoea, emaciation, and post-mortem appearances. He says it is curable if taken early. Aristotle asserted it was communicable. Aretieus gives an excellent description of the disease, and recognises two of the most potent curative factors. Celsus recognised the necessity of getting a 72 oonsumptive clear away from the surroundings in which he con- tracted the disease. Perhaps the greatest observer, however, was an Englishman, Dr. Bennet, who wrote and spoke from actual experience of the disease in his own person. His book was pub- lished in 1742. The Seed. It will thus be seen that the older writers had an extensive acquaintance with consumption. It is interesting to find that the writer of one of the newest books on the prevention of tuberculosis culls so much of the medical part of the subject from the classical works of authors who wrote more than half a century ago. In modern times the subject has been very carefully studied, and about 40 years ago almost every point in its nature, cause, dura- tion, and treatment was abreast of present-day knowledge — ^the bacillus excepted. In 1882, Robert Koch, a German physician, showed from observation and experiments that consumption is associated with and propagated by a minute bacillus ; and a great many now believe, and here we may assume, that where there is no bacillus there can be no consumption. When Koch found that a bacillus existed in eases of consumption, and that this bacillus, if suitably inoculated, could cause consumption in another, then writers came forward with the apparently scientific advice, ' ' Kill the bacillus in its lair, and so cure the disease," forgetful alto- gether of the disposition of the individual, or of the fact that there was an individual to be considered. The death of the bacillus in the lung was the summitm boiium ; the life of the person to whom, the lung belonged was a matter of secondary importance. Medical art for a time was influenced, and influenced for evil, by the hasty theorising of people whose view was somewhat less than one-sided, after the discovery of the bacillus of tuberculosis. This short road to cure proved, in many instances, a short cut to something else, and "killing the bacillus in its lair" — i.e., administering "specifics" and quack medicines or much vaunted cures — is no longer the approved method of treating consumption. The Soil. Undoubtedly too much was ascribed to the bacillus. The bacillus will not cause consumption in everybody any more than it will produce the disease in a piece of wood. A lighted match will cause fire only when there is inflammable material. A seed requires suitable conditions for its germination and suitable soil for its grovTth. The bacillus is only one of the conditions, only one factor in the cause of the disease. Where are we to look for the other ? Only in one place — the body ; and it is the body, with its varying conditions and predispositions, that determines whether any process. shall occur, and, if so, what process, and to 16 what extent. The recognition of the two factors, the soil and the seed, the susceptible body and the inoculating germ, as being necessary before consumption can lay hold on a human being, is what puts the treatment and the prevention of the disease on a rational basis. The bodily disposition to disease is to a large extent in the hands of the individual, and often before the disease has laid hold of its victim he has the choice between a long life and a short one. In 1901 a Tuberculosis Congress was held in London. The full title of the congress, which we seldom see quoted, is very signifi- cant. It was the "British Congress on Tuberculosis for the Prevention of Consumption." No doubt the treatment of this malady was discussed, as was also the cause; but in all con- siderations of the cause and treatment, the one idea constantly before the congress was prevention. In that one word is summed up the whole problem of consumption — its communicability, its curability, its heredity, its causation. Consumption a Univeesal Disease, but Preventable. Tuberculosis, geographically speaking, is a universal disease of civilisation. It may affect every human being and at any period of his life. It may show itself in any or every organ of the human body. It is a communicable disease, but it is a curable disease, especially in its early stages. The vast majority of those attacked by it recover. Further, it is a preventable disease. There is no reason nor any necessity why any particular individual should acquire the disease if proper precautions are taken. A study of the bacillus has given us the means of knowing the doors of exit from one individual, the vehicles of distribution, and the doors of entrance into another. And it is this knowledge that has given us the power to control the spread of this dire malady. Consumption not Hereditary. Many people — perhaps most people — believe that consumption is hereditary. When asked on what evidence their belief is based they will point to instances where a father or a mother, or both, may have suffered f rom^ consumption, and where the children also have been consumptives. But they have not considered whether or not all the members of the family may have acquired the disease in the same way from a common source. To call all such cases indiscriminately instanced of heredity is an abuse of terms. The question of heredity must be discussed from the point of view of observations and statistics. A very careful study of cases has yielded the following con- clusions : — ^First, the percentage of consumptives having a tuber- cular parentage is actually smaller than that having a non- tubercular parentage, and much smaller than would be accounted 74 for by the additional risk of infection to whicii the former class is subjected; and second, tuberculosis in the parents renders to no inconsiderable extent an immunity to the disease in the offspring — ^an immunity which, of course, is but relative, and not sufficiently protective, but still demonstrable, as is shown by increased resistance to the progress of the disease, and increased tendency to recover among this class. The disease is not hereditary. Further, there is nothing in medicine or in scientific observation to show that consumption in the parent predisposes the offspring to contract the disease any more than does any other general weakening cause that may affect the progeny injuriously. COMMUNICABILITY OF CONSUMPTION. I have already said that consumption has been known to be a communicable disease since the days of Aristotle. Most of the modern study of communieability centres round the exciting cause- — the bacilli or germs. Observation and experiment agree in showing that if the exciting cause, the tubercle bacilli, be im- planted in suitable soil and nourished under suitable conditions, the disease we know as consumption will result. We may here put aside the question of a non-tubercular consumption. The recognised sources of these tubercle bacilli are two — con- sumptive people and consumptive lower animals. The tubercle bacillus is not known to "breed on its own" outside an animal body. If bacilli were given off by all parts and in all secretions of the body indiscriminately, the task of combating and con- trolling the spread of this disease would be a hopeless one. What gives hopefulness and practicability to the control of the disease- is the fact that, although it is impossible to "kill the parasite in its lair," or wage war against countless nlillions of bacilli else- where, the channels of communication are accessible, and can be- controUed. The flesh and milk of the lower animals are recognised as the usual channels- of communication from them to the human being, but in Australia the danger from these sources is not great. The hximan subject gives off bacilli in the sputum. Many consump- tives, however, do not spit at all. The spit of many others — perhaps of the great majority — contains bacilli only now and then. Pprther, millions and millions of bacilli may be expec- torated, and few of them may be found virulent. Even the virulent or disease-producing have but little vitality, except in specially favorable circumstances. The one thing to fear, the chief source of danger, is dried spit in dark places. Sunlight and fresh air in certain quantity are fatal to the bacilli. The fresh germs are also destroyed without much difficulty by certain substances known as disinfectants or antiseptics. Finally, dried' sputum, discharges from the air passages, and the continued presence of bacilli in unhealthy rooms, form the chief means bf passing the disease on from man to man. Let us accept these conclusions as widely admitted, and we may discuss the riieans of prevention of the disease. Notification. If we are to deal with consumption in an effective way, we must have the means of knowing where the consumptive is, and what his physical, social, and sanitary circumstances are. This means that compulsory notification is essential. It has often been said, and widely repeated, that notification is impossible on account of the great inconvenience and hardship it would entail on con- sumptives. Such theoretical reasoning has been disproved in practice. In South Australia, where compulsory notification has been in force for upwards of 20 years, the system has worked smoothly, and has been productive of very valuable scientific and practical results. On the subject of notification one must refer to a statement by Dr. Newsholme, because it is likely to be quoted in part only. He says — "At present it would be inexpedient, unwise, and of relatively little use to advise the general adoption of com- pulsory notification of phthisis. Public opinion is not ripe for this step, and such notification would reman to a large extent a dead letter. Local authorities are not ready to utilise the in- formation thus received to the benefit of the patient and the public." This is quite true. Local authorities in Australia are much worse off in this respect than those in England. They are not only not ready, but they have not the means, and it is not possible that they will have the means for many a day. They cannot be expected to undertake the control of consumption any more than they can be expected to make and manage the railways. When ordinary cleanliness and healthy conditions and the lives and well-being of the community are put in the balance against vested interests and permissive action and a halfpenny in the pound health rate, the public weal scale kicks the beam every time. The wise, the observant, the experienced, who know the local conditions of health administration, and have considered this subject of consumption, recognise that it is a State affair, and it is with the State aspect of it that we have here to deal. With notification in force, we not only discover the consumptive, but we have the means of finding whence he comes, and we can determine where he goes or where he ought to go. Consumption and Housing. Even the slightest practical experience of the working of notification convinces one that consumption is a house disease. Dr. Flick says: — "Without the house tiiberculosis would Wot 76 exist. It depends upon the house for its implantation and pro- pagation, and for the evolution of all its phenomena. The house is the place where the tubercle bacillus lies dormant in wait for its new host ; it is the place where the new host gets his implanta- tion; it is the place where the tubercular subject gradually becomes a consumptive ; and it is the place where the consumptive dies. If man desires to free himself from the great white plague, he will have to retrace his steps from some of what he considers advanced points of civilisation. He will have to learn, among other things, that fresh air is God's greatest gift on earth, and that whoever shuts out fresh air shuts out health and happiness. ' ' We hear a great deal about the possibility of persons acquiring consumption in the streets, and the risk of taking consumption has been made a reason, if not the chief reason, for passing by-laws against spitting on the pavement. Now, spitting on the pavement is a filthy and indecent habit, and laws should be passed against it, provided they are likely to be enforced; but there is no need to tell well-meaning scientific untruths to support such legislation. It is true that one may acquire consumption in the street, just as it is true that one may acquire pneumonia from the evaporation if one should water it, or bronchitis from the dust if one should omit to water it ; but the chances of acquiring any of these diseases in this way are about equal, and, in the majority of Australian streets, are so small as to be negligible. The house, and especially the bedroom, yields the great majority of our consumptives. Formerly, builders had difficulty in keeping the breezes out, and people slept in curtained four- posters in consequence. Now, architecture has improved so much that in these days of burglar-proof windows and Tale locks the air cannot get in, not even by the keyhole. For every case of consumption acquired in the streets hundreds and thousands are contracted in houses. Damp sites, damp soils, damp vapors, damp filth, damp floors, damp walls, dark streets, dark alleys, dark houses, closely-curtained rooms, unswept floors, uncleaned walls, contaminated air, flies and vermin-infested places, over-crowded bedrooms, food exposed to contamination in dairies, milk-shops, greengrocers' stores, or in the houses of the patients themselves — these are the conditions in which the bacillus continues capable of existing, and the vehicles by which it finds entrance to a human being, so as to produce the disease should he perchance prove susceptible to it. And even then it is recognised that protracted exposure to large doses of the infection is usually required before the patient takes the disease. _ Next to the dwelling-house, as a breeding ground of consump- tives, comes the factory or the workshop, with its air kept from stagnation only by the occasional stirring up of the infected dust. Along with it comes the public-house, with its dark bar parlors, with damp walls, and unswept and much-spat-upon floors. What are we to do with the breeding ground of the disease when we have found it? If we were "heathen Chinese" we would hold a street procession of the inhabitants, with a dragon at its head, and conclude the ceremony by burning down the house and every infected article in it. But, being Christians, we, of our Christian charity, allow the owner, especially if he is a town councillor, or the father, cousin, partner, or friend of one, to go on drawing his rents from his uninhabitable house ; and then we endeavor to fan the flame of philanthropic feeling in other citizens by asking them to emulate this public-spirited man, whose name appears in the subscription list as "donating" half-a-crown to a sanatorium for consumptives! We shall never act justly to our fellow mortals, or scientifically in our attitude to the great plague, until we ensure equitable administration of the health laws of the State, through officers who are influenced neither charitably nor mercenarily, but only by the knowledge that if they do not do their work they will vacate their office promptly. The housing problem would then . solve itself. Meantime, much might be done, not by the State, not by the local authorities, not by philanthropists, but by private individuals in a business way and on an 8 per cent, basis, along the lines of the Edinburgh Social Union, by building new houses, or buying up old ones and renovating them, and letting them and looking after them in a sane, sanitary, and business fashion. Such houses never lack tenants. The Management op tAe Consumptive. What, in the next place, is to be done with the consumptive himself, the man who, through lack of knowledge, cannot inanage himself, and is a perpetual or intermittent source pf danger to his neighbors ? First of all, he does not require to be sent away to some much-advertised region, where he will spend as much money in the process of dying, or recovering to be a loafer, as would keep his family in comfort and cure himself under proper supervision at his own home. It is now recognised that climate, per se, has practically nothing to do with the matter ; that t)ie question is not where a consumptive is to live, but how he is to live ; that consumption can be successfully treated anywhere ; that it is pure air and sunshine, and not a particular climate, that is the essential factor in the treatment; and that "the cures of consumption accomplished in the home climate in which the patients remain are more lasting and more assured than when cures have been attained by temporary residence elsewhere." There are, broadly speaking, two classes of consumptives to be dealt with— the incapable, and the able to work. The consump- tive incapables are proper objects of the State's care, just as all the bodily and mentally feeble are, and all the more so since they 78 are usually in the advanced stage of consumption, and likely to be actively dangerous to their neighbors. They are to be kept under constant and effective supervision in institutions or else- where for so long and in such a manner as may be found neces- sary. The great majority, however, are those who are able to work and earn the whole or part of their living. These have to be instructed in the art of curing themselves at home, and of pre- venting their disease from spreading to others. It is being found that the most effective measures are short periods of sanatorium treatment, and the provision of medical dispensaries associated with home visitation and help of the patients. The sanatorium is to be regarded as a school for instruction in the value of pure air and cleanliness, sunlight, and suitable food, and the formation of hygienic habits. . It is doubtful if a sanatorium serves any other useful or necessary purpose. The training begun there will be carried on at home and in the workshop by the consumptive himself, under such supervision as may be required in order to render him hygienically harmless. The patient 's conscience may be appealed to, but his self-interest will form the most effective lever' in dealing with him. He must be taught that even public carriers are subject to regulations in such matters as the transit of gunpowder, and that while consumptives have legal and. moral rights, the general public, too, have theirs. Education. Tuberculosis, it has been said, is a disease of misery. It. is also a disease of ignorance. People now realise the necessity of educating the public, and especially school children, in the facts of personal hygiene and the simple principles applicable to the control of the disease. This education should not be of the alarming or panic variety. Reasonable precautions will be tajcep all the more readily if the facts concerning tuberculosis are fairly and correctly stated, and if the conclusions are logically drawn from the data. Administrative Control. In various places and very frequently, questions have been raised as to how certain administrative measures of control would be regarded by consumptives themselves, their relatives and friends, medical practitioners, local authorities, the various Governments, and the public generally. In South Australia we learned much on these points in connection with the establish- ment of a system of visiting nurse inspectors of the Central Board of Health ; and the experience of 12 years of compulsory notification of pulmonary tuberculosis in the State was set forth. ia in an address delivered before the Fifteenth International Con- gress on Hygiene and Demography at Washington, in 1912. The system of visiting nurses has proved one of the most efficient agencies of control and education. The Economic Aspects op Consumption. The machinery for all this work of dealing with consumptives should be provided by the State, and should be under the imme- diate direction of the State health authorities. The question most likely to be asked is, ' ' Can we afford to do it ; what will it cost ? ' ' The question that really demands an answer is, ' ' Can we afford not to do it ; what are we paying now for not doing it ? " Dr. Hermann Biggs estimates the total annual loss in the United States from tuberculosis at £66,000,000. He first calcu- lates the loss to New York City by putting a value of £300 upon each life at the average age at which deaths from tuberculosis occur. This gives a total of £3,000,000 for the lives lost annually. To this has to be added the loss due to the fact that for at least nine months before death these patients cannot work; and the loss of service at 4s. a day, and the cost of food, nursing, medi- cines, attendance, &c., at 6s. a day, result in a further loss of £1,600,000, making a yearly loss to the city from tuberculosis of £4,600,000. The estimated annual total of 150,000 deaths from tuberculosis in the United States thus represents a loss of £66,000,000. He shows that the £100,000 spent annually by the city of New York in the care of consumptives does not exceed 2 per cent, of the actual loss by death, &c. ; and he adds, ' ' If this annual expenditure were doubled or trebled, it would mean the saving of several thousand lives annually, to say nothing of the enormous saving in suffering. ' ' On the same basis of calculation, the loss to the Australian Commonwealth in 1917 was £1,480,160, and the total loss for 37 years ending 1917 was £54,216,800. The loss to the individual States was— New South Wales, £17,200,040; Queensland, £6,721,440; South Australia, £5,179,240; Tasmania, £1,831,720; Victoria, £21,315,360; Western Australia, £1,969,000. This refers to money alone, and takes no account of the sufferings of the victims or of tlieir friends and relatives. Ineffective Present Administration. Another view of the subject has to be presented. In 1907, in the Commonwealth, 3,858 persons died from consumption— 321 every month, 74 a week, more than 10 a day, from a single pre- ventable disease, which we take no serious measures to control; and we fold our hands and talk impiously of the will of God, or piously theorise about the birth rate. If this tale of deaths, with »u its baleful accompaniments of sickness and misery, occurred from shipwrecks, or railway accidents, or mining operations, or other similar causes that are really less subject to our control than con- sumption is, the nation would rise and demand that somebody should suffer for something; in other words, there would be a general clamor for active measures of investigation and preven- tion. At present if a medical man, for some reason or other, refrains from notifying a ease of consumption, his explanation is received, or excuses are made for him. If an officer of health condemns a consumption house as uninhabitable, the local authority wants to know first of all who the owner is. If a consumptive is found engaged in milking cows, and selling vegetables, or keeping a post office, with a public telephone in it, p'eople say, ' ' Poor fellow, he must make a living somehow. ' ' It does not follow, however, that this particular "how" is the only possibility. Do we allow regulations regarding shipping, railways, and mines to be broken with impunity ? If not, why not ? Because such breaches would involve companies in payments of pounds, shillings, and pence, with costs, while breaches of the Public Health Acts, under the present methods of administration, result only in ill health and death. We still live and act as if we regarded money, even, other people 's money, as of more value than health and lives,' even our own lives. The' Summing-up. The whole management of consumption is summed up in — (1) abolishing consumption houses and other insanitary conditions; (2) checking the dissemination of the disease by controlling the dangerous cases; (3) teaching people how to be consumption- proof. For this we Require trained health administrators, who will be adequately supervised by and held responsible to the State. Five per cent, of the money at present annually lost on account of consumption, if properly expended, would in a few years establish a complete and effective system of control, and in a few years more might banish the disease from the Common- wealth. 81 THE SICK ROOM AND DISINFECTION. The sick room should be chosen from the point of view of its natural isolation, or the possibility of its being cut olf from com- munication with 'the rest of the house. To isolate a person is so to care for that sick person or "carrier" that the infective material of the disease will not be transferred from that person to any other person either directly or indirectly. The necessary precautions will depend on the particular disease and the con- difion of the patient. Isolation is too often thought of as mere geographical separation, which may not be isolation at all in the medical sense. In this State, wooden houses with plenty of windows may easily be placed temporarily at some distance from the dwelling-houses. Tents, for infectious cases, have been used very largely in connection with ordinary general hospitals, and have proved satisfactory for emergency use. What is really required in a sick room is plenty of air and light, and means for regulating both, an open fireplace, and as little as possible for dust to lie on or infective material to adhere to. The room, if in the house, should be preferably at the end of a passage, or at the top of the house. It. should be as far as possible 'from the kitchen. The floor should be bare, although strips of carpet that can be burned afterwards, may be used. If it should be impracticable to remove the carpet it should be covered with linen. If the room is to be used for a long period, the flooring, as far as is possible,- should be made impervious by having all the cracks filled in and then stained and varnished or beeswaxed ; the wall paper should be varnished, or walls stripped and painted, or limewashed; the ceiling should be cemented or painted, or limewashed frequently. All curtains, pictures, ornaments, and unnecessary furniture should be removed. Something outside the door should warn people off. The sheet one sometimes sees soaked with carbolic acid is useless, sometimes harmful, from a hygienic point