QfotneU Hmtietfiitg iCibtatg 3t^aca, Nem gntk THE GIFT OF LI vt i v" i'V s i t -y Tor o vl t" c Lit' VdV y- To renew this book copy the call No. and give to the hbrarian, ' - , HOME USE RULES yr---'^-;-^^* ii,^- All Books subject to Recall All borrowers must regis- ter in the library to borrow -I |t j books for home use. ■- All books must be re- turned at end of college year for inspection and repairs. Limited books must be re- turned within the four week limit and not renewed. Students must return all books before leaving town. Officers should arrange for the return of books wanted during their absence from town. Volumes of periodicals and of pamphlote are held in the library as much as possible. For special pur- poses they are given out for "'• a limited time. 4- Borrowers should not use their Ubrary privileges (or the benefit of other persons. Books of special value and gift books, when th« giver wishes it, are not allowed to circulate. Readers are asked to re- port all cases of booki marked or mutilated. Do not deface books by marks and writiac. Cornell University Ubrary BS2650 .P91 Studies in Pauline eschatoiogy and its b 3 1924 029 292 947 olin Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029292947 studies in Pauline Eschatology AND ITS BACKGROUND By EDWIN J. PRATT, M.A., B.D. A Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Toronto February, 19»7 TORONTO WILLIAM BRIGGS 1917 Copyright, Canada. 1917, by Edwin J. Pratt. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Introduction 5 I., Tabular Form of the Concepts: The Day of the Lord, The Messianic Age, The Resur- rection, Spirit, Soul, Body, Flesh, etc. (Charts) 10a II. Summary of Tables 11 III. Conjectural Outline of Paul's Life and the Order of the Epistles 23 IV. Paul's General Use of the Concepts: Spirit, Soul, Flesh, Body 25 V. Paul's Treatment of the Same Concepts from the Eschatological Standpoint 68 VI. Paul's Treatment of the Concepts: The Parausia, The Messianic Age, and Their Apocalyptic Accompaniments 120 VTI. Conclusions 193 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this inquiry is to investigate certain religious concepts which were fundamental in the thought of the apostle Paul. For the delimitation of the field those concepts have been chosen which, as will be later argued, formed the intellectual groundwork of his teaching, and be- long to a domain usually designated as Eschat- ology. The ripened products of Paul's thought which constitute his theology are here not ex- pounded; the inquiry rather is into those basal conceptions out of which the theology grew. Hence the attenipt is to examine that intellectual equipment, inherited largely from the past, with which he addressed himself to the pressing prob- lems of his day. For this purpose it will be neces- sary to study- the general religious outlook of his race at the time during which he wrote which, in turn, can only be properly determined by an analysis of Jewish beliefs and speculations in the centuries immediately preceding. In the treatment of any concepts that belong to the progress, of a nation's thought, an important question arises as to the selection of a timepoint in the stream of development — to use a current 5 INTEODUCTION" expression — wherewith to commence the investiga- tion. Naturally the stream cannot be traced to its original source for that would lead back to an age so distant that nothing but the merest con- jecture could be formed in view of the lack of memorials, literary, archaeological or otherwise. Indeed, as the development of the Jewish eschato- logical thought is not in itself the objective of this thesis, but rather the bearing of such a product upon the outlook of Paul, the needs of the case can be reasonably satisfied if the analysis begins with the distinct literary remains of early Hebrew prophecy represented by such names as Amos, Hosea and Isaiah. This preliminary task will be limited as far as possible to the delineation of the great outstanding hopes which gave perpetual vitality to the long line of prophetic succession, and which, when prophecy in the accepted sense had ceased, and was replaced by a new movement described as apocalyptic, still persisted in spite of the transformations conditioned by an ever-chang- ing history. It may be claimed that the attempt to discover what were the actual thought processes of people living over two thousand years ago must always remain unsatisfactory, especially when the people often resorted to allegory and pictorial symbolism to express their meaning. But this difficulty lies behind all investigation into the life of primitive peoples, and to a less or greater measure awakens any investigator handling an historical question to a sense of the seriousness of his problem. It 6 INTRODUCTION might be conceded indeed that the more allegori- cal and fanciful a writer the greater the liability that an interpreter should fail to grasp the import of his message, and that becomes a perplexing handicap when a whole system of teaching is couched in the symbols of mysticism as instanced by that of Philo. However, in this development it is a source of satisfaction that certain of the cardinal beliefs under consideration were unfolded by prophets who were too intense in their moral aims to becloud their messages by the constant use of ambiguous language, and this taken into conjunction with the fact that the more oracular utterances of the age of apocalyptic may often have their hidden meanings disclosed by the events of contemporary history, makes less difficult the treatment. Starting then with religious experiences known mainly by their records in Hebrew literature of the eighth century B.C., the attempt will be made to follow the course of eschatological develop- ment down to the time of Late Judaism when Paul appeared upon the scene. The main concepts under review will be those treated in the first chapter: — The Day of Yahweh, The Messianic Expectation, The Future Life, Pneuma and Psyche, together with those hopes and beliefs which grew out of them. It must not be sup- posed that such an analysis would exhaust the description of all the sources of influence upon the mind of Paul at the commencement of his career. The complete background is obviously not on 7 INTEODUCTION record. Moreover, it might be reasonably held that a considerable portion of eschatological mater- ial never formed a part of his education, and a great deal more he might conceivably have re- jected, but, nevertheless, to discover vi^hat was the apocalyptic teaching in currency when he was shaping the religious views of the primitive church is essential for an adequate appreciation of his own position. Following that, the main interest will consist in the analysis of the apostle^s views with regard to the future age. The heir to the accumulated inheritance of Pharisaic apocalyptic gathered mainly out of the issues which produced the Mac- cabsean times, did he tacitly accept the traditions as a finality, and then proceed to construct his theology, or did he on the other hand subject it to a rigorous examination modifying it and develop- ing it, as his intense missionary zeal brought him in vital touch with the varied religious phenomena of the G-rseco-Eoman world ? This, then, is the task of the thesis. It is not a case of what might be called " the objective truth " of the beliefs registered in the literature, not a case of the discovery of criteria by which certain religious views might be rejected as simply "subjective fancy," and others sustained because of their supposed '' absolute validity,'^ but rather a question of determining by critical analysis, how various controlling ideas which regulated and inspired the action and thought of a people emerged out of antecedent ideas into distinct- 8 INTEODUCTION ness, and how, in their turn, these again were formative in producing the thought-content of a succeeding age. The setting forth of that develop- ment is here regarded as a psychological study. Before the investigator are given language-records, really an elaborated system of synfbols which, according to their characteristics, may be desig- nated prophetic, apocalyptic, epistolary and so on. Assuming now it is possible to place fairly approximately the records in chronological succes- sion, the question is as to the nature of the inter- action between the processes of imagination, belief and reflection, and the political events of a nation or a group of individuals, as this interaction is reflected in the transmitted symbols which we call their literature. The historical investigation into the order of the books in both the Old and 'New Testaments constitutes a special problem in itself. With regard to the Old Testament many sections in Pre-exilic prophecy are by some authorities rele- gated to Post-exilic times. That, however, is not so vital to this inquiry, for wherever they are placed they long antedate the Pauline literature, and hence help to form its background. Introduc- tion, though, becomes more important when the writings of Paul are being examined, as it is precisely the development of certain phases of their content that forms this task. It will then be necessary to state briefly the generally accepted findings upon the order of the epistles. As an essential preliminary to this, there is supplied in 9 INTRODUCTION tabular form the variations in the main concepts of the historical works, in their order, of the Hebrew prophets and the writers of subsequent Jewish religious literature down to the latter part of the first Christian century. The summary of these fundamental concepts thus aSords the appropriate introduction to the analytic study of their operation in the religious thought of Paul. 10 CHAPTEE II. SUMMARY OF TABLES. The concepts classified in the foregoing chapter represent, in part, the changing religious thought of the Hebrews from the period of early prophecy down to the latter decades of the first century A.D. It has been customary to divide up this stretch of history into broad sections according to outstanding events constituting crises in the life of the nation. Such divisions may, from the standpoint of the Babylonian captivity be termed Pre-exilic and Post-exilic, or viewed from the transformation of religious outlook consequent upon exilic and Maccabsean developments be termed Prophetic and Apocalyptic. The former period, speaking generally, would embrace the two centuries antedating the exile, the exile itself, and the two centuries following. Its chief character- istics are the appeals of the great teachers for national repentance, the fundamental insistence upon the righteousness of Yahweh involving in turn the demand for the righteousness of his people, the certainty of judgment upon wrong- doers, the favor of Yahweh resulting from obedi- ence, and almost ' universally the promise of a coming era of blessedness for the kingdom of Israel contingent upon its preparation in the hearts of men — a kingdom wherein all forms of 11 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY oppression would cease whether of the character of civic injustice or of foreign despotism. The age of apocalyptic ranged from the second century B.C. to the first century A.D. The name is applied to a special body of anonymous and pseudepigraphic literature which began with the rise of the Maccabees, followed the varied fortunes of that dynasty, and continued to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. and even after. The tran- sition from the prophetic to this form of literary activity was mediated through writings which probably were produced before the second century B.C., but appear as interpolated sections in the canonical books especially in Isaiah and Zechariah. Other prophecies as Ezekiel and Joel show decided affinities with this later type and undoubtedly pre- pared the way for it. While apocalyptic does not make an absolute break with its predecessors in Jewish literature, inasmuch as the forecasts of prophecy are taken as the basis for its own inter- pretation of the future, and as the same hopes for the ultimate triumph of the nation are common to both, yet the differences are many and impor- tant. The call of the prophet to repentance ; his passionate denunciation of sin rampant within the life of his community, while present at times, was not the keynote of this new message. The attack became concentrated upon the heathen oppressor and the official priesthood — the abettors in the forced Hellenization of their own countrymen. No author placed his own signature to his work. The canon of prophecy had probably been completed 12 SUMMARY OF TABLES and the stamp of authority had to be created by the association of the message with a great name of the distant past. The form current was the vision — the machinery of Ezekiel rendered still more intricate. Attempts were made to fix pre- cisely the date of the coming judgment with the overthrow of pagan enemies and apostates within the fold. Tyrants were described under the sym- bolism of wild beasts. The history of the world became mapped out into several divisions, and the writer regarded himself as living with the end in sight. The consummation of the kingdom as taught in prophecy was gradually transformed in character until the expectation included, not the land of Israel renewed and blessed but a trans- cendent and heavenly kingdom prepared afresh by God where the national idea was completely abandoned. Angelology became a constant fea- ture. Speculation as to the nature of the soul, the life after death, the resurrection of the body, the punishment of the wicked, the reward of the righteous, grew with the progress of the literature. Behind it all was the deep-rooted conviction that the promises which Yahweh had made to his people through his servants, deferred indeed as they had been throughout many generations, yet were inviolable, and would receive their complete fruition at a time which was imminent. It is only necessary here to sum up briefly the characteristic beliefs, the development of which is traced in the foregoing classification. 13 STUDIES m PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY Whatever may have been the original meaning of the phrase, " The Day of Yahweh/^ it is evident of Yau^eh ^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^™^ i^ which Amos wrote it was con- strued by the popular imagination with favorable meaning. The reverse construction was placed upon it by the greater prophets, Amos leading the . way with a vivid description of its terrifying char- acter. It spelled disaster to Israel as well as to the other nations simply upon moral grounds. It was to be accompanied by fearful visitations in nature, by earthquake, darkness and tempest. The picture drawn in the second chapter of Isaiah seems to imply a world judgment with the vindica- tion of Yahweh alone. Later, as seen in Zephaniah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel the destruction of immense foreign hordes invading Judah was comprehended in the general catastrophe. The Post-exilic writers exhibit a tendency to direct the brunt of the desolation upon the Gentile nations, returning somewhat to the earlier view. The second century with the introduction of apocalyptic widened the sweep of the judgment to the extreme limits, so that not only the world powers but also disobedient angels and demons were to fall before its blasts. The idea of a double Judgment was developed — that which occurred at the deluge, and the final one yet to appear. The strange accompaniments seen in earlier pictures were still further elabo- rated. Eiery swords fall to the earth; cataclysms of rain and fire occur ; the sun becomes quenched, the moon turned into blood; famine and earth- quake — " The Woes of the Messiah," prelude the 14 SUMMAEY OF TABLES end when the first earth and the first heaven pass away. The age so inaugurated was universally con- ceived as one of glory and triumph for the king- dom of Yahweh. The destruction of world Messianic empire would free Israel from the bondage and oppression to which she had been continuously subjected. In the vision of the prophets the change from the old order did not involve the removal of the scene of blessedness from the present earth. The land of Palestine was still to be inhabited; the Dispersed of Israel were to be restored from their exile^ and united with the righteous remnant. Wonderful fertility would mark the soil ; poverty and misery would become a condition of the past; Israel would "'blossom as the lily and cast forth its roots like Lebanon." Even the animal world would be transformed, the peacefulness characteristic of the restored State being reflected in the harmony amongst the wild animals. National hopes centred in the political restoration and perpetuation of the Davidic line. At times the interest was focussed upon the importance of the Temple and the Priesthood as in the theoretical construction of Ezekiel; at times it was the free and unofficial worship of Yahweh with his law written on the heart as in Jeremiah which was foremost; in any case the vision was that of -a theocracy in which the devoted service that Israel rendered to her national God was rewarded, according to the terms of the original covenant with his mercy and favor. This hope underwent 15 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY considerable transformation in later thought. Early apocalyptic, it is true, placed the scene of the new kingdom upon the present earth. Homes were still to be built and inhabited, vines planted and harvests reaped, but the age of the inhabitants was to be wonderfully increased. The last chap- ters of Isaiah furnished the description which was taken over by a number of writers notably of the second century B.C. The century following intro- duced remarkable developments. The establish- ment of the kingdom took place occasionally upon the earth after an inaugural judgment, but it was merely temporary and was to be superseded by a final judgment wherein the present order of things passed away, to be followed by an exalted and heavenly Israel the citizens of which were to become like the angels. This extreme position was reached mainly by the increasing sense of the irretrievably evil character of the natural world, by the disappointment of Messianic hopes and the longing for an existence where, in the words of Second Enoch, " all corruptible things shall vanish and there shall be eternal life." The Messiah. The analysis showed that many of the prophets anticipated the coming of a king " out of the loins of David who, supremely endowed with the spirit of Yahweh, would reign in wisdom and in righteousness. The ninth chapter of Isaiah unfolds a striking delineation of his character, and the thirty-second represents him as governing his kingdom in association with princes sharing in the same functions. Jeremiah refers similarly to a 16 SUMMAEY OF TABLES righteous '"Branch raised unto David who shall reign as king and deal wisely/^ and he also refers to shepherds who shall feed the people "with knowledge and understanding." In Ezekiel, the allusion is to David the Prince^ or to a number of princes ruling in succession upon the Davidic throne. And so in the case of Zerubbabel, when the first pre-exilic prophets attempted to stimulate national enthusiasm in the early days of the Eestoration. While it is true that the hope of the future is scarcely ever expressed without relation to an ideal kingdom or commonwealth, yet a special doctrine of the Messiah is not a constant and integral constituent of the hope. If the " Servant passages " receive the construction now placed upon them by a large body of scholars, namely, that of an ideal kingdom rather than of an ideal king, the invariable presence of a Messiah-hope can be still less established. Many of the prophecies make no allusion at all to the Messiah as, for instance, Amos, Zephaniah, Joel, and the later eschatological additions in Isaiah. The great deliverance for the nation is generally the peculiar achievement of Yahweh himself. The same feature characterises the apocalyptic writ- ings. The earliest strand of Enoch refers only to the presence of God with his people upon the earth, and it is probable that the much-discussed phrase in Daniel does not possess the individual interpretation sometimes ascribed to it. The Assumption of Moses, certain portions of Enoch, the First and Second Maccabees contain no such 17 -STUDIES IK PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY references. On the other hand, prominence is given to the Messiah in the second 'section of Enoch where he appears under the symbolism of a white bull but, nevertheless, it is God who estab- lishes the kingdom. Towards the close of the second century B.C. the expectation of a Messiah sprung from the tribe of Levi is seen in the Testa- ments and in Jubilees, evidently in respect to the Maccabsean leaders. The most specific references are in the Similitudes of Enoch of the first cen- tury B.C., where he is conceived as pre-existent and possessing the high functions of Judgeship in connection with the final Judgment, but the whole scene is set in a supramundane sphere of activity. The first Christian century documents show simi- lar variations. Most of the writings are silent upon the subject, though definite allusions are found in 2 Baruch and 4 Ezra. In the earlier strands of the former work a Messiah is to reign in a temporary kingdom upon the earth. In 4 Ezra some early sections predict the coming of Enoch, Elijah, and Moses as a prelude to the end ushered in not by the Messiah, but by the " voice of God." Other passages still considered early give full descriptions of the " Son of Man " pre- existent and coming " in the clouds of heaven '' to judge the world. Another section evidently show- ing traces of Christian redaction (according to 'Charles) alludes to the death of the Messiah after a reign of four liundred years upon earth. Such passages show the tendency of eschatological thought to vindicate the prophetic forecasts of the 18 SUMMAEY OF TABLES Messianic kingdom by postulating a temporary- rule of Yahweh upon earth varying in length with the views of individual winters. They also show, in the final displacement of the earthly kingdom by a heavenly one, how firmly rooted was the pessimism, seen at its acutest in the Alexandrian literature, as to the thoroughly corruptible char- acter of the present world. The advent of " The Age " was in the thought of the prophets close at hand. Usually it was to appear at the end of a crisis in which the nation ^^® ^^^®- was at the time involved ; with the destruction of Assyria ; with the Eestoration from exile ; with the comipletion of the Temple building; or with the fall of the Persian Empire. ISTot the least change in the transition from prophecy to apocalyptic are the novel methods adopted to determine with pre- cision the date. The seventy years of Jeremiah were, in the prediction of Daniel, interpreted by the angel as seventy weeks of years from the exile, with the desecration of the Temple by Antiochus Epiphanes taking place in the last week. It was to come with the Maccabsean success, or later with the destruction of the Eoman Empire. Wherever two Judgments were declared the inter- val between constituted the Messianic age. Its duration was calculated as five hundred years, or as seventy generations, or again as three world weeks, that is, from the eighth week to the tenth inclusive, of a series of ten weeks comprising the history of the world. In II Enoch the millennial idea is expressed in that, the world already having 19 STUDIES m PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY completed the span of six thousand years, the Messianic age would stretch through another period of one thousand years before the final judgment. The attitude towards the Gentiles assumes vari- ous phases determined by the changing relation- The Gentues. gj^jp ^f ^j^g jg^ ^j^j^ ^^^ outside world, and by the character of the prophets. The rarer view is the broad cosmopolitan outlook voiced by such men as Amos, the First and Second Isaiahs, Jeremiah, Malachi and Jonah. Here the promises of the kingdom are extended far beyond Hebrew limits, and in some of the noblest utterances the outlook is not qualifi^ed by the thought of Gentile subjec- tion after conversion. With other writers the nations are to share in Israel's future, but their position is one of servility, and whatever conces- sion ' is granted, it is made to depend upon the Gentile acceptance of Jewish observances. Again, the expectation is one of their general destruction especially of hostile nations as seen in Habakkuk, Ezekiel, Haggai and Zechariah. In apocalyptic the same viewpoints are expressed, Enoch 1-36 taking the broad ground of the first, and followed by the Testaments. But the prevalent disposition is one of extreme antagonism, the Similitudes refusing to consider the conversion of the Gentiles, notwithstanding the possibility of their repent- ance. The Psalms of Solomon allow the repentant nations the chance of survival at the advent of the Messiah, but they become subject to his heavy yoke. In the latter writings of the first century 20 SUMMAEY OF TABLES A.D. the hatred has become so fierce that the judg- ment leaves nothing to them but " dust of ashes and smell of smoke/^ But one of the main dividing lines between prophecy and apocalyptic is that whereas, in the former, the doctrine of the resurrection, whether bodily or pneumatic, found practically no place, The Resur- it became, in the latter, an invariable feature. In the Messianic kingdom of the prophets, the inhabitants after living long lives departed into the abode of Sheol. Indications of an individual bodily resurrection appear first in Isaiah 24-27, where the author takes pains to state that such a privilege is restricted to righteous Israelites, and this is the general tendency throughout the second century B.C., though occasionally, and with quali- fication, the resurrection of the wicked is admitted. The first century B.C., except in one instance, denied the resurrection of the body but affirmed it of the righteous spirit. The first century A.D. follows practically the same teaching — apart from the Alexandrian literature which postulates only the immortality of the spirit — until toward the close appeared the belief in a general resurrection of the bodily form. Concurrently with this belief there grew up a body of speculation regarding the nature of Sheol. sheoi. From its being the great underworld where the dead lay practically without any of the distinctions that characterise the living, it became, in Pales- tinian thought, an intermediate state containing Soui. chambers or treasuries for the souls or spirits of 21 STUDIES m PAULIISrE ESCHATOLOGY Spirit. Angelology. the departed, from which the righteous rose either to Paradise or to Heaven. At other times it was the final abode of punishment for the wicked, and synonymous with Gehenna. The departed are designated as souls or spirits, these terms being interchangeable. Eighteous souls were to enjoy eternal felicity, the wicked, eternal anguish. A highly developed Angelology and Demonology is prevalent throughout apocalyptic. The righteous after the resurrection take on the likeness of good angels, whereas the wicked, the fallen angels and demons suffer the same ultimate condemnation. 32 CHAPTEE III. CONJECTURAL OUTLINE OF PAUL'S LIFE AND THE ORDER OF THE EPISTLES., Events. Bates. Conversion 34-36 In Arabia, three years. 35 (36)-38 (39) First visit to Jerusalem. (Visit of fifteen days with Peter). 38 (39) In Cilicia and Antioch To 45 Second visit to Jerusalem. (Collection for the Poor) , . 46 (i) Missionary Journey 47-49 (Cyprus, Pisidia, Lycaonia.) The Council at Jerusalem. (Third visit to Jerusalem) . . 50 (ii) Missionary Journey 51-53 1. Thessalonians — (At Corinth) 53 2. Thessalonians — ■ (At Corinth) 53 Fourth visit to Jerusalem. . . 53 (iii) Missionary Journey — (Asia Minor to Ephesus, thence to Macedonia and Corinth) 54-58 Galatians — (Possibly during early part of residence at Ephesus) I Corinthians — (Towards close of visit to Ephesus) II Corinthians — (Probably after departure from Ephesus) Romans — (Probably at Corinth) .... Fifth visit to Jerusalem. (Arrested in Temple) . . 58 .. 54 57 57 58 Authorities. Zahn, Turner, Weiss, Findlay, Jiilicher, Sabatier, Burton. (Harnack, Moffatt = 30.) (Ramsay = 33.) Turner, Ramsay, Bartlet. (Lightfoot ~ 45.) (Zahn = 44.) Turner, Ramsay, Lightfoot, Moffatt. Ramsay ^ 50. Lightfoot, Burton := 51. Sabatier ^ 52. Harnack ^ 47. Turner, Moffatt, Findlay, Bart- let = 49. Zahn, Ramsay, Lightfoot, Jiil- icher, Weiss, Drummond, agree in the main. (Harnack = 47-49.) (Turner ~ 49-50.) Zahn, May (1). Zahn, September (2). Ramsay, Spring of 53. Zahn, Ramsay, Lightfoot, Find- lay, Sabatier, agree in the main. (Moffatt = 52-56.) Priority of Galatians to the other three epistles generally accepted. Scheme in bracket observed by Sabatier, Jiilicher, Sanday and Headlam, Drummond, Moffatt. Some place Galatians between the Corinthian epistles and Romans; e.g., Lightfoot, Findlay, Adeney. 23 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY Imprisonment at Caesarea.. 58-60 Journey id Ronle . 61 In Roman Captivity 61-63 Imprisonment Epistles- Colossians. Philemon. Ephesians. Philippians. Zahn, Rarasay, Clemen, Light- foot, substantially in agree- ment. Zahn, Sabatier, Burton, Light- foot. (Harnack = 57.) (Findlay = 60.) (Ramsay = 60.) (Jiilicher = 62'.) (Weiss = 62.) Zahn, Sabatier, Burton, Light- foot. (Harnack = 57.) (Findlay = 60.) (Ramsay — 60.) (Jiilicher = 62.) (Weiss = 62.) Order usually assigned. ' ' Colossians is certainly to be placed before Ephesians (when the last named is taken as genuine) though priority here carries with it very little sig- nificance. Both letters were written about the same time." — Moffatt, ' ' Historical New Testament,' ' p. 131. Lightfoot placed Philippians first, though he admits that the reverse order ' ' is the prevail- ing view among the vast major- ity of recent writers." — Philippians, p. 32. Jiilicher, Harnack, O. Holtz- mann. (Turner = 64-65.) (Burton = 65.) (McGiffert rz 58.) (Lightfoot, Ramsay, Find- lay = 67.) Hypothesis of a release from imprisonment, together with that of the Pauline authorship of the Pastoral Epistles, not very Strongly supported. The following works of reference have been used amongst others as the main sources of Historical Introduction: — New Testament Introductions of Zahn, Jiilicher, Pindlay, Adeney ; L' ApGtre Paul. Sabatier ; Luke, Acts, Harnack ; Apostolic Age, McGiff ert ; St. Paul, The Traveller, Ramsay ; Epistles, Lightfoot; Article, Chronology, H. B. T>. Turner; Romans, Sanday and Headlam; Epistles, Milligan; and particularly Moffatt 's "Historical New Testament," for comparative tables of Chronology. Death of Paul 63-64 24 CHAPTEE IV. PAUL'S GENEBAL USE OF TEE CONCEPTS: SPIRIT, SOUL, FLESH, BODY, ETC. To understand the position of Paul with regard to the foregoing system of concepts known as soul i^xv), spirit (Trvev/xa), flesh (o-dpi)^ hody (ta), and others of like character, it would be well as a point of departure to review in brief the teachings of the great sources to which he had access, viz., the Old Testament and the Post- Canonical writings. This itself is a task of some difficulty as the passages in which these words occur do not always admit of clear-cut interpretation. Nephesh and Ruach (tl' B J, m "l) designating soul and spirit, are constantly being used in the Old Testament in a loose and popular -sense, the easy transition from one to the other making it almost impossible to mark out any sharp boundaries of meaning. The nephesh is ^^* Testa- described as beinff the subiect of hate and aversion nae of ^ ** Kepliesli. (Isaiah i, 14) ; of fear and trembling (His soul trembleth within him — Isaiah xv, 4) ; of delight and joy (Behold, my chosen in whom my soul delighteth — Isaiah xlii, 1 ) ; of , pity and compas- sion (That which your soul pitieth — Ezekiel xxiv, 21) ; of comfort and satisfaction (Psalm Ixxvii, 2-6); of longing and desire (Job xxiii, 13); of 25 STUDIES IlSr PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY Physical and Moral Appetites. vexation (And the Almighty who hath vexed my soul — Job xxviij 2); of loathing and disgust The emotions. (Zechariah xi^ 8). Here ostensibly the ascriptions are respecting emotional attributes of the soul, but both physical and moral appetites are predicated of it. " And it shall be as when a hungry man dreameth; and behold he eateth, but he awaketh and his soul is empty. Or as when a thirsty man dreameth, and behold he drinketh but he awaketh and behold he is faint" (Isaiah xxix, 8). See Micah vii, 1-3 ; Isaiah v, 14 ; and Jeremiah xxxi, 25 — " Por I have satiated the weary soul, and every sorrowful soul have I replenished." Also Proverbs xxv, 25 — "As cold water to a thirsty soul so is good news from a far country." The term may likewise stand for the physical life of the organism; it may indicate the life of the nation personified, and expressed by the reflexive pronoun. " Backsliding Israel hath showed her- self (n tt^ S j) more righteous than treacherous Judah" (Jeremiah iii, 11), It may broadly rep- resent a large number of individuals in a collective sense, " eight hundred and thirty persons " ( t^ £ J Jeremiah Iii, 29) ; "every living creature" (^ S J- b 5 Ezekiel xlvii, 9).^ Further, it is identified with the blood and hence with the heart and the life. "To shed blood, to destroy souls" (Ezekiel xxii, 27). But nearly all these qualities may be similarly ascribed to the ruach. The emotions of distress, Individual and CoUective * Cf, Genesis xlvi, 18 (The sixteen sons of Jacob are sixteen sonls). 26 QENEEAL TKEATMENT OF CONCEPTS fear and pity may belong indifferently to the soul, heart or spirit even in the same writer. " And every heart shall melt, . . . and every spirit shall faint " (Ezekiel xxi, 7). " That which your ^idjesta- soul pitieth" (Ezekiel xxiv, 21). "And theyj^^^^^^f shall weep for thee in bitterness of soul with bit- ter mourning^' (Ezekiel xxvii, 31). "Joy of heart and despite of soul" (Ezekiel xxxvi, 5). The ethical change from rebellion against Yahweh^s commandments to devotion to his ser- vice is expressed in the famous passage of Ezekiel xi, 19, " And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit in you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh and I will give them a heart of flesh." So Isaiah liv, 6, " Grieved in spirit " ; and the following references : — " They have quieted my spirit." " Spirit of heaviness." " For the spirit would faint before me, and the souls that I have made." " With my soul have I its general T . 1 , 1 interchange- desired thee m the ni^ht; yea, with my snirit ability with -XI ■ -m -r . Nephesh. witmn me will 1 seek thee earnestly." Zechariah vi, 8; Isaiah Ixv, 14; Isaiah Ivii, 16; xxvi, 9. Notice Job^s expression of his grief and pain: — " I will speak in the anguish of my spirit; I will complain in the bitterness of my soul" (vii, 11). Dejection, discomfort, and misery are attributed in the same way; ''A glad heart maketh a cheer- ful countenance, but by sorrow of heart the spirit is broken" (Proverbs xv, 13). "For the enemy hath persecuted my soul; He hath smitten my life down to the ground. Therefore is my spirit 37 STUDIES m PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY overwhelmed within me; My heart is desolate within me" (Psalm cxliii^ 3, 4), A further examination of the passages given in the analysis reveals the easy interchangeability of usage which, as far as the feelings are concerned, allow of no rigid dichotomy of soul and spirit. This applies also to the chronological development of the religious thought of the nation. The later writers, as well as the earlier, use the same terms with practically the same emotional content, with Stensitiesof ^^^^ difference, however, that unusual intensities St^iiliiuai* of feeling came to be regarded pre-eminently as IJk^e?^"^^''*^ the properties of the ruaeh, while the ordinary tr^ach. states manifested in the daily round of life be- longed to the nephesh, although here the distinc- tion is not absolute. It is on the intellectual and volitional side that the contrast between nephesh and ruach is best exhibited, for these belong mainly to the sphere of the ruach. The deliberate refusal of the prophet's message by his countrymen is designated as a ruach of perverseness (Isaiah xix, 14). False prophets or men guided by them are actuated by a ruach of falsehood (Micah ii, 11; Jeremiah v, 13). It is the term used for the wind, the east wind, and the ethical transference is then made to the shallow utterances of unthinking people.^ While nephesh was in common use to indicate an individual in the most complete sense, that is ^ Ezekiel xxxvii, 9. Zechariah vi, 5. Job vi, 26; ivi, 3. Eccleeiastes i, 14; ii, 2. 28 GENEEAL TEEATMENT OF CONCEPTS to say, with the significance attached to the per- sonal pronouns/ I, thou, etc., ruach is not so employed. "My ruach" was not used as an equiva- lent for "my nephesh."^ And in the case of people taken collectively, nephesh is the term. No defi- nite and unambiguous examples can be found where ruach designates the life of the organism. But there are instances where the nephesh is some- how regarded as being the result of the ruach especially the Euach of Yahweh, which, as soon as the latter departs, the human ruach becomes extinct. The nearest approximation of ruach to nephesh in this sense may perhaps be seen in such statements as Ecclesiastes iii, 19, and Psalm cxlvi, ^"cii not ' ' ' nsed Uke 4. " As the one dieth, so dieth the other ; yea, they ^®pJ®|*^ all have one breath, and man hath no pre-eminence individual. over the beast." " His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth," where man and beast were represented as having a unitary basis. But with a few apparent exceptions such as these, it may be claimed that the use of nephesh to designate the organic life of an individual in the widest sense^ forms the main basis of differentiation from that of ruach. As life then depends upon the presence of either the nephesh (occasionally neshama) or the ruach, so death, conversely, is the result of the departure of either. "And it came to pass, as her nep- hesh was departing, for she died, that she called 1 Schultz, O. T. Theol., vol. ii, p. 247. ^ Charles, Eschatology, p. 38. 3 Koeberle, Watur und Geist, p. 202 ff. 29 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY his name Benoni " (Genesis xxxv, 18). " Let this child's nephesh come unto him again" (I Kings xvii, 21); "He (God) that giveth breath (neshama) unto the people upon it (the earth), and ruach to them that walk therein" (Isaiah xlii, 5).^ Neither term is applied to the existence of the individual after death wherever such a view is held. Two conceptions are to be seen in Hebrew thought, first, an older and popular view, which attributed to the departed a certain degree of vitality and knowledge, and a later one which tended to reduce this activity to a very low ebb if it did not deny it altogether.^ Wherever the former is in evidence, such terms aso*'J'lj?1*'(the knowing ones), QtSD"! (shades) are used. In the apocalyptic literature little development in this direction is seen as far as the emotional and intellectual life is concerned. The main result has been to make the terms more synony- mous than ever. Feelings such as grief and pain as well as the qualities of wisdom and understand- ing belong to the spirit.^ The ethical sense of a '^ .spirit of righteousness " is common,** as also the identification of the soul with the blood, or with the heart, or with the strength.^ The spirit faints * Ezekiel xxxvii, 5. Job xxxiii, 4; ixxiv, 14. Ecclesiastes xii, 7. 2 Biblical World, L. B. Paton, Article, xxxv, No. 4, Ap. 1910. 3 Daniel v, 10-13; vi, 3; vii, 15. * Jubilees xxv, 14. ^ Jubilees xxi, 2 ; 2 Baruch xlvi, 5. 30 GBNEEAL TEEATMENT OF CONCEPTS and the soul is humbled.^ Either the spirit or the soul is roused to action,^ is hardened or is broken.^ The principal contributions, which this Greek period* has furnished, lie in the direction of specu- lations regarding the soul or spirit after death, or the nature of angels and demons; a phase of the discussion which will be treated later. One dis- tinction alone may be traced in the employment of the terms, namely, that spirit and never souP is the designation of angels and demons, while to f|py*^ ^^ describe the human being in his post-earthly state ^emons*^** both terms are freely interchangeable. No dichotomy of soul and spirit can be discovered, except perhaps in two or three passages** which seem to stand out in the general mass of the litera- ture as exemplifying a new current of speculative thought with which the Hebrew literature has very little in common. Turning now to the use of these concepts and their corresponding terms by Paul, the passages in which the term, psyche, occurs yield in certain cases the same meaning as already indicated. It is used as a strong expression of affection for hisf*^*^ Thessalonian converts for whose well-being Paul * Judith iv, 9; vii, 19. => Mace. XV, 10, 17. 3 Zadokite Fragment iv, 6. * For the widespread belief throughout the Greek world of the nature of the soul after its separation from the body, and its bearing upon the question of immortality in connection with Mystery ritual, see Rohde^ Psyche, i, p. 294 ff. °This does not apply to Philo's usage; see references. «Tobit iii, 6; 1 Baruch ii, 17; 2 Mace. vii. 23, 23. 31 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY would spend himself " in labor and travail, night and day." " Even so, being affectionately desirous of you, we were well pleased to impart unto you, not the gospel of God only, but also our own souls (ras iavrSiv \j/vxa.<>), because ye were become very dear to us " (I Thessalonians ii, 8). It is used to give additional weight to his affirmations when he wishes to convince his readers that his interest expression ^^ their welfare is genuine. " But I call God for emotions ^ witness upon my souP that to spare you, I for- bore to come to Corinth" (II Corinthians i, 23). Once, it is used to sum up their religious life in general. "And I will gladly spend and be spent for your souls" (II Corinthians xii, 15). It is scarcely correct to say, with Charles, that Paul "never speaks, as almost all the other writers of the New Testament do, of the salvation of the soul, save in one instance, as in his first epistle " (I Thessalonians v, 23).^ "While, indeed, the predominant usage is to regard salvation as the final goal of the pneuma, yet the distinction is not so fixed that eternal interests may not likewise belong to the psyche. It seems likely that here in this case, the phrase " for your souls " {v-n-lp twv tfn}x6opd)^ namely^ dcfyOapa-ta^ not simply adavaa-Ca. Process How the transformation takes place Paul does simply ^ assigned not answer, except in his characteristic method of to God. ^ attributing the change to God. " God giveth it a body even as it pleased him/' and in a moment it is given in exchange for the other. That is for Paul, as for Hebrew thought in general, the full explanation behind aU new forms of life in vegetable and human existence. It is one example among many of the fivari^pux of God. But this incorruptible, pneumatic soma is not indeed the exclusive inheritance of the resurrected. It is given as well to those in Christ who survive to the Parousia. The transformation affects both the living and the dead, just as in I Thessalonians the gathering together of Christians " to meet the Lord in the air " includes both classes. The further description of the new soma is based upon familiar illustration. In II Corinthians v, the present soma is likened to an earthly build- ing, a tent (ot/cta rav ovfX€Oa) into the same image (eUovaf from glory to glory (dTro Soirjs €ts Bo^av) * "And be ye not f ashionod accord- ing to this world; but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind that ye may prove what is the good and acceptable and perfect will of God."^ The opposition between the present and the future o-ttifMi given at length in I Corinthians xv, is applied to the present and future life in II 'Corinthians iv, 17, 18. The things of this world are "seen and temporal^' (ra pXeiroficva and TTpoo-Katpa ) ; the things of the future are not seen ^ Colossians iii, 4. 2 II Corinthians i, 22. ^Ephesians i, 12-14. % *II Corinthians iii, 18. ■* Romans xii, 2. 96 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTS (ra fiTj jSXcTTo/Aei/a) and are eternal (atwvto). But still, as already emphasized, the character of the present life is a preparation for the future. "For our light affliction which is for the moment, work- eth for us more and more exceedingly an eternal weight of glory." The recompense of the righteous who '%y patience in well-doing seek for glory and honour and incorruption " is eternal life.^ Jt is a ^^reign in life"^ through Jesus Christ. It is a taking on of the likeness of his resurrection, conditioned upon heing "united with him in the likeness of his death/^^ It is a glorification with him, heightened in contrast with present misery. "For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed to us-ward,"* In a word it is " the redemption of the body," which the apostle eagerly awaits. "And not only so, but ourselves also, who have the first-fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves waiting for our adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body."^ The eschatological deliverance in which nature shares we well as human beings, is expressed by the antithesis of "The bondage of corruption" with the ^^iberty of the glory of the children of God."« ' Romans ii, 6. ^ Romans v, 17. ' Romans vi. 5. * Romans viii, 17, 18. ^Romans viii, 23. * Romans viii, 21. 7 97 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY If the future life then depending as it does upon the present relation of the individual to Christ, is summed up in such phrases as: a deliverance from wrath, salvation/ an eternal weight of glory, an incorruptible crown, our inheritance, honor and incorruption, eternal life, or simply life itself, what are the characteristics of the eschatological death? It does not imply merely death in the sense of the cessation of physi- ":\\ functions though inclusive of it. Neither can it be shown that Paul's statements argue for a theory of annihilation at the dissolution of the organism. Apocalyptic speculation treated exten- sively this question and interpreted death for the wicked as their continued existence in some part of Sheol or in Gehenna. It became "an eternal dying." "Ye shall be burned with torches the live-long day throughout the age." ^ It is an "eternal punishment'^ conceived by some of the seers as a perpetual separation from God,^ as a "banishment from the face of the Lord of Spirits,"^ or as the penalty of "not being remem- bered when the righteous are visited."^ The souls of the wicked are portrayed as being slain in Sheol, yet this slaying is paraphrased as an existence of intense wretchedness. "Know ye that their souls will be made to descend into Sheol, and ^ For discussion of this in its relation to 66^a and (o>^ in Jewish Eschatology, see Volz, JUdische Eschatologie. Hei! Tind Seligkeit, par. 44. ^ Sib. Oracles, Proverbs iii, 44. 8 Testament, Pats. T. R. iv, 6 ; v. 5. * 1 Enoch, liii, 2. ^ Psalms, Solomon, iii, 13, 14. 98 SIGNIFICAISTCE OF CONCEPTS they will become wretched, and great will be their tribulation/'^ "And they shall weep and feel their pain forever."^ This is a phase of the question which Paul hesitates to discuss. He shows little of that exul- tation displayed by a Jew at a crisis of persecution over the spectacular punishment of his foes. It was regarded as one of the compensating privi- leges of the pious Jew that he might look down from his abode in Paradise upon the torment of his oppressors. Paul prefers to dwell more upon the happy lot of the righteous than upon the mis- fortunes of the wicked. But in the relatively few instances where he does describe the condi- tion of the latter, it is nevertheless one of irre- parable loss and disaster. The conception given in the Testaments of a lasting banishment from the face of the Lord is expressed in II Thessa- lonians. It consists of punitive suffering, even eternal destruction "from the face of the Lord, and from the glory of his might.'" It is a visi- tation of wrath, from which the righteous are delivered at the Parousia, as against the glory and honor of those who, by patience in well-doing, receive as their inheritance eternal life, the exis- tence of the wicked is one of " tribulation and anguish."^ Further than this the apocalyptic speculation of the apostle does not extend.* The general ^ I Enoch ciii. 8. 2 Judith xvi. 17. ^ Romans ii, 9. * See Thesis, p. 149, for theory of Restoration. 99 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY tendency is to set death as the antipodal contrast to life without drawing minute pictures of the antithesis. The phrases epitomizing the distinc- tion are in the most succinct manner placed in opposition; "The mind of the flesh, the mind of the spirit/^^ "The wages of sin, the free gift of God."^ " Dead through trespasses and sins ; being made alive together with Christ."^ "Being separate from Christ . . . having no hope and without God in the world, being made nigh in the blood of Christ."* The question now reverts again to the character of the future a-wfia. It was seen that in divesting it of flesh and blood, Paul diverged from a strong- ly marked traditional tendency, particularly Palestinian,^ while he favored in one respect the Hellenistic interpretation. But this sweeping independence is illustrated by the exclusive use of the pneuma and the pneumatic body to designate the form of the eschatological life. Although he used psyche and pneuma, together with other concepts of non-apocalyptic connotation, as large- ly interchangeable, in general conformity with past and current speculation, still the future life of the Christian is invariably that of the pneuma, and never that of the psyche. The latter concept is, in one instance, applied to the wicked in the des- ^ Romans viii, 6. 2 Romans vi, 23. ^ Ephesians ii, 1-5 ; Colossians ii, 13. * Ephesians ii, 12-14. •> See Volz, op. cit. par. Materielle and Spirituelle Anschauung, for discussion of opposition between Palestinian and Alexandrian views. 100 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTS cription of .their punishment at the Parousiaj but pneuma is never so employed, although earlier literature contains many examples of the torment of the pneumata of the wicked in Gehenna, Just as there are as many examples, on the other hand, of the use of the psyche in the same connection. Similarly in the same writings the future bliss of the righteous is ascribed either to their psyche or pneuma. And also in the New Testament, in other than the Pauline documents, the eschato- logical usage of psyche is inclusive of both the wicked and the good.^ But Paul strikes out in a new direction. In the command to the Corin- thian church to expel the culprit who is guilty of incest he hopes by the destruction of the flesh "that the pneuma may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus."^ This troublesome passage has been accorded a great variety of exegesis. Some of the early fathers construed tlie phrase "delivering to Satan" as a synonym of excommunication, "but there is no proof that such a formula of excom- munication existed either in the synagogue or the early church."^ To some it implies the belief that the excommunication in the presence of the whole church, and accompanied as it was by the solemn utterance of the formula, would issue in physical affliction or possibly death to the offen- der; that is to say the magical effect of the pro- ^ Compare Matthew x, 28; Luke xii, 19, 20; Hebrews x, 39j James i, 21; I Peter i, 9; Revelations vi, 9; xx, 4. = I Corinthians v, 5. ^ Expository Greek Testament, I Corinthians, Findlay, p. 809. 101 STUDIES IN PAULIlSrE ESCHATOLOGY nouncement of a name is connected with the operation of a curse. ^ Compare the cases of Ananias and Elymas. Acts v, xiii. But the reference to the hope of the ultimate salvation of the condemned person would involve that whatever afflictions might be visited upon him through Satan^ the effect would be of a remedial character issuing possibly in the repent- ance and salvation of the culprit. The thorn in the flesh which afflicted Paul was regarded by him in the light of a salutary agency, even though it was a messenger of Satan. ^ In any case, the point to be noted here is that the actual salvation is conceived, in accordance with the rest of the apostle^s teaching, as a property of the pneuma. Then if this is the consistent Pauline usage of pneuma as the subject of the present and eschatological a-wriqpia^ may anything further be added that would furnish us with a concrete picture of the o-w/Aa Trvev/AartKov ? With the view of a catastrophic destruction of the world by fire, so marked a feature of apocalyptic, and the intro- duction of a completely new order at the Parousia, what earthly symbolism could be employed in the delineation of the pneumatic o-w/Aa transcendent in its very nature ? Is there any description other than that indicated by such terms as incorruptible, immortal, spiritual, etc., which would suggest further delimitation? Or does the very fact of 1 Heitmuller, quoted by Clemen, Primitive Chriatianity, p. 233 E. T. -II Corinthians xii, 7. 102 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTS a catastrophic standpoint preclude such an inquiry at the outset? If the Parousia ushered in an eternal Messianic Kingdom upon the earth such as the prophets dreamed of, or even that which certain seers of the second century B.C. portrayed, then a great deal of description could still be couched in human and earthly terms. But this standpoint has in the outlook of Paul been super- seded. The account of I Thessalonians would, unless the interpretation proceeds upon an extremely figurative basis, localize the resurrected ones in the clouds with Christ. The added quali- fication that they are to meet "in the air" is one that cannot be paralleled in Jewish literature,^ though the notion of an ascent into the upper regions is quite common.- This general concep- tion is also Pauline, for the new home or building is "eternal in the heavens," the latter phrase being in frequent employment, in apocalyptic, to denote the home of the soul or the spirit after the resur- rection. Heaven is conceived as the abode of the angels, and is always pictured as above the earth, a place to which a spirit ascends in contrast to Sheol to which entrance is made by descent. Paul makes heaven the present home of Christ and the future home of Christians. "He that descended is the same also that ascended far above all the heavens that he might fill all things."^ Here ^ Expos. Greek Testament, Moffatt, I Thessalonians, p. 38. 2 Expositor, Askwith, Eschatological Section of I Thessa- lonians, January, 1911, p. 67. ^ Ephesians iv, 10. 103 STUDIES IN PAULIISrE ESCHATOLOGY indeed, Christ is pictured as being enthroned in a region even higher than the heavens; but in Philippians iii, 20 this qualification is not added. "For our citizenship is in heaven; whence also we wait for a Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ." Is it then possible to conclude from the symbols employed that when Paul spoke of the pneumatic o-w/Attj the imagery present in his imagination possessed some of the characteristics of the human body in that it had shape, localization and other spatial features ? The comparison of the souls or spirits of the righteous in the heavenly world to angels or stars is met with in other literature. ''And time cannot age them, for they shall dwell in the heights of that world, and be like the angels, and be comparable with stars."^ Cumont refers to the poems of Lucan and Statins where these writers addressing Nero and Domitian respectively ask the question as to what part of heaven will the Emperors inhabit after their apotheosis. "Will they mount on the flaming chariot of the Sun? Will they take their place as new stars among the constellations? Or even will Jupiter himself in the height of the heavens yield to them his sceptre?"^ Moreover, theo- phanies and angelophanies figured largely in ^Apac. Banicli, li, 3-10. * Astrology and Religion, p. 196. Note. — See Plato's reference to the stars as living angelic souls. Timgeus, Section 40, p. 53B (Jowett). 104 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTS current speculation/ The belief that gods could assume human shape and appear on earth is evident in Acts xiv, where the people of Lystra declare with regard to the presence of Paul and Barnabas and their work among them : "The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men." And angels ( see earlier discussion ) possess certain human functions in that they may converse with men in language understood by the latter, become visible, and are clothed in apparel, the raiment being described as effulgent light, and the appear- ance likened to that of the sun or heavenly glory. Stephen's face at his martyrdom is "as it had been the face of an angel/' An interesting illustration of this point is the statement of II Enoch xx, 1 if, where the writer characterizes the " fiery troops " of heaven as consisting of " great archangels, incorporeal forces, dominions and orders," etc., some of them possessing many eyes, and "stand- ing in stations of light," or on the "ten steps according to their range," living in " places of joy and felicity, singing songs in the boundless light." Gressmann and Bousset "believe that the white robe was originally, in the case of deities, a cultus representation of the luminous nature of their bodies." A statement in the Bundehesh runs as follows: "When through me (Ahura Mazda) the sky arose from the substance of the ruby, without columns, on the spiritual support of far-com- passed light, — when by me the sun and the moon 3 Matthew xxviii, 2 ; Luke xxiv, 4 ; John xx, 12 ; Acts vi, 15; X, 30. 105 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY and stars are conducted in the firmament of luminous bodies, etc."^ But it is one thing to claim that when Paul uses such highly pictorial language as he does, the corresponding imagery might be an angelic or pneumatic being with certain properties of shape, light, and other human lineaments, and quite another matter to argue that had he entered further into the speculative description, he would have constructed a definite replica of the human body, differing from the latter indeed by its not possessing flesh and blood, but resembling it in form, and having a habitation even though it were in some non-terrestrial sphere. The evidence is altogether too scant for the conclusion that the eschatological soma was a sort of a "wraith of light,^' or an embodied though blood- less and fleshless apparition as a shade, familiar to many Jewish and Greek writings. The pictorial analogies of the apostle are a dangerous ground for such an interpretation. It is true that angels, and stars, and righteous spirits are often regard- ed as synonymous, but some caution must be exercised in committing oneself to such a declara- tive statement as that given by Weinel: — "Evi- dently Paul thought of himself and his contem- poraries, Jew as well as Greek, dwelling in the glorious celestial bodies of the stars, call them * Quoted by Clemen, op. cit. p. 174. 106 siG]sriFicA:NrcE of concepts Helios, or Semele, Azazel or Uriel."^ The stars or the heavenly bodies- may have afforded him the best pictures available to express the hope of glory awaiting Christians in the Hereafter, but never- theless his usual method in representing the pneumatic body is to refer it to the likeness of Christ/ but when we seek for precise description of this likeness of Christ, the regressus goes still further back to what is called the form or image of God. As illustrations of this, the following instances may be cited. "For if we have become united with him in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection" ;* "If so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified with him;"^ "For whom he did foreknow, he also foreordained to be conformed to the image of his Son;"^ "Who (Christ) shall fashion anew the body of our humiliation, that it may be conformed to the body of his glory."^ But to determine the character of the body of his glory we learn that Christ is the image (etKwv) of God.® The " light of the knowledge of the glory of God" is in his face.^ He is the image 1 St. Paul, p. 26. ^ See Hibbert Journal, Article, Grilbert Murray, Oct., 1910, p. 20; for discussion of the deification of tbe sun, moon, and stars in Plato, Aristotle, and Stoics. 3 Carre, Biblical World, Oct., 1916, p. 204. * Romans vi, 5. ° Romans viii, 17. ^ Romans viii, 29. ' Philippians iii, 21. 8 II Corinthians iv, 4. ^ II Corinthians iv, 6. 107 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY of the invisible God/ and pre-existed in the form' (fioptj}!/]) * of God.^ The terms which sum up thfe description are those of glory^ radiance, power, and form etc. It is easy to see that to construct a more precise formula of definition is an impossible task. To take the instances where the phrases, " in the heavens, in the heavenly places, the image of the heavenly, above princi- palities and powers,^' and others occur, as indicat- ing definite spatial properties, is confronted by the difficulty involved in the transference of simile from human beings to Christ and thence to God. It is true that when the Old Testament prophets tried to give a description of their vision of God, imagery implying symbolic localization is employed. Isaiah pictures God as " sitting upon a throne high and lifted up,^' while his glory fills the Temple.^ Resplendent light, glowing metal and fire, thunderous noise and other awe-inspiring phenomena are the features of Ezekiel's vision. " This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of Yahweh."* The very circumlocution suggests the inadequacy of the symbols of por- traiture. The picture has to do rather with the attendant circumstances of the Theophany. God himself is not regarded as being visible. The light and fire are his " manifestations," the effects ^ Colossians i, 15. 2 Philippians ii, 6. ^ Isaiah vi, 1. *Ezekiel i, 28. ' *See note on fJ-optji^ and kindred terms at end of chapter. 108 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTS of his power. The more developed became the view which subsequently was designated as the Transcendence of God, the more insistent became the teaching that He could not be brought within the comprehension of human knowledge. " For what flesh can see visibly the heavenly and true God, the Immortal, whose abode is the Heaven ? "^ Especially is this so in the Alexandrian specula- tion. Philo's adjectives are : — " The Wise, The Divine, The Indivisible, The Undistributable."^ In the Book of Wisdom, God works through Wisdom which is " an affluence from everlasting light."^ Hence such expressions as "the invisible presence, the light encircling the throne, the Glory of the Great One, an insufferable blaze of light," are invariably the symbols to illustrate the unapproachable presence of God. Philo thus pictures heaven : — " An eternal day without night and without shadow, for it is lighted by inex- tinguishable and unalterably pure radiance."* In his description of Wisdom the very language he employs scarcely admits comparison with anything of the nature of physical light. It is true that he uses such phrases as a " vapor of the power of God, a pure emanation of the glory of the Omni- potent, a reflection of eternal light, a spotless mirror of the energy of God, and an image of his goodness." But he further adds, possibly to ^ Sib. Orac. Pro. i, x, xi. = Philo, i. 334. ^ Wisdom, vii, 26. * Works, vol. ii (De Josepho), p. 483. 109 STUDIES m PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY prevent a literal construction, that " Wisdom is more comely than the sun, and above all the ordering of the stars; compared with light she is found preferable for this is succeeded by night, but against Wisdom evil has no power."^ The Fourth Book of Ezra transcends even this. " ISTot mid-day or night or dawn, not gleam or brightness or shining, but wholly and alone the radiance of the glory of the Most High."^ In the Ascension of Isaiah,^ God and the Great Glory (17 /xcyaXT/ Sola) are synonyms. And also the pneumata of the righteous as of the angels are regarded as being clothed, though of course to a less degree, with the same effulgence. The monarchical con- ception of God had become so developed that even the highest angels are assigned positions prudently remote from the throne.* Enoch pictures God as surrounded by an impassable wall of fire and glory, so terrible that the nearest angels are not permitted to stand in his immediate presence nor even to see him,^ but nevertheless, glory is the characteristic not only of God but of the heavenly host whether of angelic or human existences. Philo will only allow human shape to angelic and heavenly beings when these pneumatic existences appear upon the earth. "But it happens every now * Drummond, Philo, vol. i, p. 217. 2 vii, 42. »x, 16; xi, 32. * "Have courage, Enoch, do not fear, and (they) showed me the Lord from afar, sitting on His very High Throne." 2 Enoch XX, 3. ** I Enoch xii-xvi. 110 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTS and then that on emergencies occnring, they have imitated the appearance of men, and transformed themselves so as to assume human shape." But in their native abode they are bodiless, " incor- poreal, as living spirits destitute of any body/^^ Now in Paul's treatment while he uses the hierarchical machinery with its allocations of positions and functions, his language is too figurative to demand a literal construction. It is true that the righteous pneumata have their homes in the heavenly places. That conception had become very prevalent in the century before Paul. It is present everywhere in the thought of Posidonius and his school. Cicero refers to it in his " Dream of Scipio.'' " The souls of those who have deserved immortality will not descend to the depths of the earth, they will rise again to the starry spheres."- Compare the Latin epitaph: — " My divine soul shall not descend to the shades ; heaven and the stars have borne me away; earth holds my body, and this stone an empty name."^ Paul certainly seizes hold of this belief, and adds that the righteous will become conformed to the ciKiLv of Christ, but this must be construed in the light of the terms applied to Christ. " If then ye were raised together with Christ seek the things that are above, where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God.''^ "Which he wroup:ht in Christ ^ Works, vol. iv, 334. ^ Bevan, Stoics and Sceptics, p. 111. ^ Quoted by Cuinont, op. cit., p. 179. * Colossians iii, 1. Ill STUDIES IJST PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY when he raised him from the dead, and made him to sit at his right hand in the heavenly places far ahove all rule etc."^ To rob the lan- guage of its metaphorical meaning, by fastening a prosaic literalism upon these clauses, collides at once with the more comprehensive Pauline expres- sions where Christ is conceived as " filling all in all/' and as the one in whom the universe is created and sustained. I^othing is more perplex- ing than to try to assign the terms which Paul employs to a place in a definite philosophical scheme. If the investigation in his use of lan- guage discloses any conclusion at all, it is the fact that the fluid and popular usage is everywhere dominant. A given concept may not only be taken to cover quite a variety of properties, but these properties themselves may be designated by just as great a variety of terms. Paul gives no hint whatever that he possesses a technical equip- ment of scientific terminology. To take any term and begin to explore its etjnnology in the philo- sophical schools of the fifth and fourth centuries B.C., and then insist upon grounding its Pauline significance upon the original content, is as hazardous as to run back a nineteenth century refinement into the thought of the middle ages. The argument of derivation must reckon with the fact that the apostle, intimate as he was with the prophetic development of his race, and versed in the procedure of Eabbinical argumentation, yet ^ Ephesians i, 20. 21. 113 SIGISTIFICAlSrCE OF CONCEPTS quotes from the Old Testament in the language of the Septuagint, and thus brings to the formula- tion of his religious thought a mode of expression unknown to the very men who shaped Hebrew theology. And it is quite probable that over a century had intervened between the period of this translation and the time when Paul was borrowing its phrases. All these terms spirit, soul, image, form, body, flesh and others had been used in a technical vocabulary, but from there they had passed into popular employment to serve distinc- tions more concrete. Deissmann remarks: — "One might write the history of religion as the history of religious terms, or more correctly, one must apprehend the history of religious terms as being a chapter in the history of religion . . . The Greek Old Testament was no longer under- stood in the Imperial period as it was in the Ptolemaic period, and again, a pagan Christian in Eome naturally read it otherwise than a man like Paul . . . The men of the New Testament resembled the Alexandrian translators in bringing with them from their " profane surroundings, the most varied biblical elements of thought and speech."^ This pointed statement of Deissmann applies just as well to the development of any literature. The numerous shadings and transitions through which language passes, not only in philosophical developments, but also through popular media are * Deissmann, Bible Studies, p. 79, E.T. 8 113 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY too well recognized to be challenged. This becomes all the more apparent when in the examination of the apostle^s thought^ the purely speculative ten- dency is seen to be a matter of merely passing consideration. It is true that; amidst so much of earthly suffering following in the wake of the new religious movement, that broke at once with Jewish prejudice and the demands of an imperial cult, Paul directed the hopes of Christians to a future painted in radiant colors, yet inasmuch as such a future was by its very nature transcendent and heavenly, the description had frankly to be clothed in the symbols of mysticism. No theolo- gical schematism in which doctrines of Sheol, Paradise, Heaven and Hell^ and of the ortafia and irvevfjLa are elaborately systematized can be dis- covered in the epistles. The apostle has none of the speculations of Stoic naturalism, where the body, for example, is defined as that which acts or is acted upon. Such categories as active, pas- sive, efficient cause, or such definitions as:^ " Body is that which is capable of extension in three dimensions,"^ are not included at all within his religious horizon. His method is not that of a theorist who wishes to construct a view of the universe that might satisfy a logical test, but that of a missionary who brought a practical ingenuity to bear upon the multifarious moral and social needs that grew in proportion to the expansion of his churches, and demanded sometimes imme- ^ Hicks, Stoic and Epicurean, p. 23. 114 SIGMFICANCE OF CONCEPTS diate adjustments. Solutions could never be given in abstracto. Tbey had to shape themselves in accordance with situations of a definitely local character, and it is quite conceivable that in mat- ters of provincial or racial concern, a Jew might readily dismiss a solution that would satisfy a Greek, or a Phrygian accept what a Eoman would summarily reject. But when the apostle having, however success- fully, done his best to meet such contingencies, applied himself to his great soteriological task of making known what he designated as the riches of God in Christ to the heterogeneous classes that made up the Gra?co-Eoman populations of his time, he stated his case with definiteness and lucidity. And to accomplish this, he adopted the customs, modes of thought and phraseology native to the peoples amongst whom he labored. His language therefore would have more in common with current vernacular than with the terms of academies and eclectic circles. The figures of speech, the striking similes, the illuminating illustrations that light up the epistles are a lasting monument to his skill in driving home a message as they reflect the range of his intellectual insight, and practical sagacity. His burning ethical exhor- tations place under tribute the whole field of Jewish, Eoman and Greek Metaphor. The insti- tution of slavery aSorded him not only the basis of an appeal for a more humane and considerate relationship between a SovXos and his master, 115 STUDIES m PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY but also helped to throw into relief the more radical serfdom of sin as opposed to that liberty which is the birthright of the heir of God and Joint heir with Christ. From the pursuit of agriculture he took the figure of sowing and reaping, of germination and increase, of careless- ness and diligence in husbandry, of the plough and the ox-goad, to set forth the law of harvest in the moral life, and the struggles involved in the old and new methods of salvation in the pro- cess of his own conversion. From the splendor of the sun, the moon and the stars, he tried to illustrate the radiance that would characterize the transcendent life of the pneuma and its organism. From the magnificent temple of Herod, from the Pantheon, and from the structures in the great Greek and Roman cities which, however costly and resplendent, would perish with the changes of time, he could direct the vision of his converts to an eternal temple not made with hands. From the stadium, the race-meet and the gymnasium he could illustrate how a Christian agon might be fought and won, how a race if well run would receive a laurel still more honorable than the fading wreath of wild olive placed on the brow of an athlete, and how in the match with the adversaries not of flesh and blood a moral mastery might be achieved. From the garrison in a Roman barracks, from the soldiers on parade, and on the battlefield he could turn to the breastplate of faith and love, to the armor of righteousness, 116 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTS to the helmet of salvation^ to the sword of the spirit, and indicate how necessary to the Christian were the watchful vigil, the martial steadfastness, and the iron discipline that he might endure hardness as a good soldier of Jesus Christ. And indeed the great spectacle which, perhaps above all others, impressed most the imagination of Rome together with that of her subject peoples, namely, the historic pageant which periodically moved along the Via Sacra in honor of a returning conqueror, became the grand allegory by which Paul described the immortal triumph of Christ over all his adversaries. No one could fail to catch the apostle's meaning when such well-known symbols were harnessed to the strong ethical messages of his life. The discussion of the terms shows that he was not employing a rigid technique of anthropology. A clearly schematised system of concepts was not essential to his propaganda any more than it was to the preach- ing of the Hebrew prophets.^ Provided that a term had sufficient distinctness in a given instance to serve in the enforcement of an appeal, a warn- ing, or a rebuke, or a message of comfort, it satisfied the needs of the case. The fact that in another situation, or in another environment, such a term might have a content seemingly opposed to a former usage, when considered as entering into a problem of abstract classification, was of little moment as long as the present ethical issue * Expositor, Kamsay, Article, The Teaching of Paul in Terms of the Present Day, July, 1912, p. 91. 117 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY was met. Difficulties would probably arise when later exegesis began to operate upon the problems of analysis. Note. — It is difficult to discover the precise significance of such terms as Paul uses, in the general Jewish and Greek literature. The word {^'tK^v) in Hebrews is contrasted with [GKid), "For the law having a shadow of the good things to come, not. the very image of the things.' '^ The word {XO-po-K-Tf/p) is used in the same epistle to shew the relation of Christ to God. "The very character of His substance" (TTJg vTroardaeog),^ It is the same term which Philo uses of the resemblance of the Logos to God. "But the great Moses has not named the species of the rational soul by a title resembling that of any created being, but has pronounced it an image of the divine and invisible being, making it a coin, as it were, of sterling metal, stamped and impressed with the seal of God, the impression of which is the eternal logos.** ^ The term {/iop(p^) together with expressions like kvdbeaBaiy riTiEio^ might, according to Clemen, "be borrowed from the language of the Mysteries." In the Hermetic literature the Primal man is called the fiop^^ of God. But Clemen adds: ' 'Only the expressions, 'Ye put on Christ,' and 'We have become united with Christ' . . . might ultimately be traced to the belief . . . that the participant in the rites is physically united with the Deity." * The term {//op^^) is the Septuagint translation for the fol- lowing italicised words in Daniel: — "Then the king's counten- ance was changed in him" ;^ in Job: — "A form was before mine eyes" ;^ in Wisdom'^: — "And the Egyptians hearing their voice, but not seeing their form, envied them because they had not suffered," and in IV Maccabees^: — "We stamp a marvellous likeness of our soul and of our shape on the tender nature of the child." Lightfoot has examined the expressions in the writings of Plato, Aristotle, and other earlier Greek writers, and found the following distinctions: 0';t^/iC[ denotes the figure, shape or fashion of a thing." It is used of "dress, costume, or some- times of attitude or demeanour." It signifies, moreover, "pomp, display, outward circumstance, and frequently sem- blance, pretence, as opposed to reality, but . . . altogether it suggests the idea of something changeable, fleeting, unsub- stantial. /'op0^ has none of "these secondary senses which attach to axVH-^t as gesture, or dress, or parade, or pretext . . . ^x, 1. 2i, 3. 3 Works, vol. i, p. 420. *0p. cit., p. 158, 232. ^v, 6. «iv, 16. "^ xviii, 1. " XV, 4. 118 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCEPTS TheffX^y"°is often an accident of the //o/30^." Again, that "great and entire change of the inner life, otherwise deacribed as being born again, being created anew, is spoken of as a conversion of f-Op^i} always, of <^XVI^<^ never." When Paul speaks of this change either in the present ethical, or in the future eschatological sense, fiopi) in its many forms is used. "Being made conformable {GVfXfzop(pi^6fiEVog) to his death." ^ "We are transformed jUsra^o/j^oi'/ieQa into the same image."- "Until Christ be formed {fiop(J>uQy) in you."^ "That it may be conformed ahfxfiopfpov to the body of his glory." ^ Re- ferring to the fiop^) might indicate the "hidden process" by which an initiate was supposed to attain immortality by becoming a god, but even here the esoteric character of such a rite with the consequent penalties imposed for violation of the vows of secrecy makes it diflicult to know what this metamorphosis implied. Paul's restraint in laying bare the details of the process of auT7)pia^ his aversion to refined theological technictue, leaves the philo- sophical meaning of the terms a matter of pure conjecture. The term (ei/c(^v) or {fiop(py)j since either was in the popular vocabulary, would do to express the moral likeness of a man renewed in Christ to his master, or again the extreme contrast between Christ's pre-existent state of glory with His earthly life of humiliation. ^ Philippians iii, 10. ^ II Corinthians iii, 18. ^ Galatians iv, 19. * Philippians, iii, 21. s Philippians, p. 127 fe. "Deissmann, Bible Studies, p. 57. 119 CHAPTEE VI. PAVL'8 TREATMENT OF THE CONCEPTS— THE PAROVBIA, THE MESSIANIC ACE, AND THEIR APOCALYPTIC ACCOMPANIMENTS. The question now to be investigated concerns the extent to which this eschatological background of Jewish thought, as summarized in the Tables, is reflected in the Pauline letters, which by general agreement represents the earliest literature of the Christian community. How much of the specula- tion of the two centuries preceding his time has been taken over as fixed tradition, how much rejected, and wherein, if at all, have advances been made upon the inherited body of apocalyptic faith, as the apostle wrestled with the complicated problems emerging throughout a history of thirty active years? It is true that many important events which must have had a critical bearing upon the thought of Paul do not find a place within the analytic scheme here presented, the most important obviously being the life and teach- ing of Jesus, but as the records in any form accessible to us, even the earliest of them, which chronicle such events are believed to have been committed to writing at a period later than the final letters of Paul, an exhaustive study of their 120 LAEGEE ESCHATOLOQICAL CONCEPTS data on the eschatological side need not be regard- ed as a necessary preliminary task. This fact is all the more evident when it is seen that it is precisely in the field of eschatology that tradition is formed and accumulated. Eeferences to the Synoptic accounts will be made as occasion requires. It has been seen that Hebrew and Judaistic literature painted in high color the crisis of the " latter days," and the inauguration of " The Kingdom.^' Speculation varied as to the role which the Messiah should perform. Often, as in Joel, the Assumption of Moses and II Enoch, he was not mentioned at all. Sometimes, as in I Enoch 83-90, he was regarded as merely intro- ducing the new Age, while the great upheavals and transformations were assigned directly to God. In the later developments he became more prominent. But the emphasis upon the startling accompaniments of the End, the changes in world- history, the nature of retribution and the future fortunes of the righteous and wicked is fairly uniform. The first epistle to the Thessalonians breaks i^ Jonians^*" upon this literature about the beginning of the second half of the first Christian century, and stands at the very threshold of Paul's literary activities. The church at Thessalonica had been founded in the second missionary Journey. Paul had moved on to Corinth and while there, Timothy, who had a little time before been sent 121 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY The Farousia and accompani- ments. to Athens to minister to the Thessalonians had now returned with the report of his work, and his message of their faith and love occasioned the epistle. Both Acts^ and this epistle indicate that at least one feature of the apostle's teaching had been eschatological. As the whole history of Judaism shows^ one of the main springs of apocalyptic was the fact of persecution. The promise of deliverance shone most brightly when faith was being keenly tested in the crucible of bitter oppression, and the Jew had learned that his only hope lay in God's decisive inter- vention at the close of this seon.^ No epistle of Paul shows so clearly as this one the kinship of view-point which he had with his race. Dis- tress and affliction had visited the new church and to establish them in their faith their hopes are directed towards the events of the End. The persecutors who had filled out "the measure of their sins" were soon to be overwhelmed by a catastrophic judgment. " The wrath is come upon them to the uttermost."^ The phrase, ^ opyrj ri ^p^oi^ivq^ ever upon the lips of a seer in troublous times is in prominent use here.* The ^ Acta xviii, 5. 2 This hope was not confined to the Jews. "The idea of a new era, of a fresh start in nniversal history, has sunk deep into the heart of mankind. Sometimes, it is presented as the return of a weary world to the happy innocence of a far- distant past, sometimes, as a deliverance from the intolerable evils of a worn-out state of society, but always as a consum- mation devoutly to be wished and heralded with eager antici- pation." Hicks, Stoic and Epicurean, p. 33. ^ I Thessalonians ii, 16. * 1, 10. 122 LARGEE ESCHATOLOGICAL CONCEPTS wicked are to be destroyed by it; the righteous are to be saved from it. The Messianic kingdom is to appear but it is to belong to the coming age (6 altov fji€\Xv ry Tzporepa irapovata). Thuc. i, 128.^ Further, certain papyri use the word in a technical sense concerning the official visit of a ruler or his ambassador. The Jewish apocrypha make very sparing use of the term, but when so used it has the same meaning as above; e.g., Judas MaccabaBUs refers to the immediate approach of Nicanor (r^v irapovaiav tov arparoTriSov II Mace, viii, 12. In the Testaments it refers to the manifestation of God upon earth (euf Trapovaia^ TOV Qeov TTJg SiKaioavv^g Judah xxii, 3). In Paul it is the usual term for the advent of Jesus at the final judgment, and thus the old term and its main content are here retained but applied to Jesus of Nazareth. ^ Milligan, Paul, Thessalonians, p. 146. 135 STUDIES IIST PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY debate — only the nature and time of the event being subject to extended discussion — so in the First Epistle to the Corinthians, it is taken for granted. No reasons are advanced in proof of parousia the Parousia. It is rather used as an accepted expected. argument to show the need of righteousness of action in view of coming judgment. It is variously characterized — " The revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ" (i, 7), "the day of the Lord (Jesus) Christ" (i, 8), "The day" (iii, 13), "The day of the Lord (Jesus) " (v, 5), "The ends of the ages" (x, 11). Its main content is that of judgment, and the thoroughness of the test to which human character is put. Fire is the symbol which is again applied. " Each man's work shall be made manifest, for the day shall declare it because it is revealed in fire " (iii, 13). "Wherefore judge nothing before the time until the Lord come, who will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and make manifest the counsels of the heart" (iv, 5).^ The judgment which is to be upon the world including men and angels is effected not only by the Messiah,^ bat also by the saints (vi, 2). This thought was a familiar one in Jewish tradition. In Daniel,^ at the appearance of the Ancient of Days, " judg- ment was given to the saints of the Most High,'' and in the Wisdom of Solomon the souls of the ^Cf. Matthew xix, 28. Luke xxii, 30. ^ Mattlie-w ixv. Acts xvii, 31. "vii, 22. 136 LAEGEE ESCHATOLOGICAL CONCEPTS righteous share in this Messianic function.^ That the apostle has practically the same view concern- ing the nearness of the Paronsia, as he had in the earlier epistles of the Thessalonians^ is evident from the seventh chapter. Persecution, ever a sign of the hastening end was afflicting his church. " I think therefore, that this is good by reason of the distress that is upon us, that it is good for a man to be as he is '' (verse 36). " But interval is this I say brethren, the time is shortened, that henceforth both those that have wives may be as though they had none, . . . and those that use the world as not using it to the full, for the fashion of this world passeth away" (29-31). It would seem that the advice was based not merely upon the shortness of the interval but also upon the nature of the new kingdom ushered in by the Parousia, a kingdom which according to certain phases of current tradition did not admit of these earthly relationships. " The sons of this world marry and are given in marriage, but they that are accounted worthy to attain to that world, . . . neither marry nor are given in marriage, . . . for they are equal to the angels." Luke xx, 34-36. Cf. also Matthew xxii, 30; Mark xii, 25. It is possible that the question may have been raised by a celibate sect in Corinth or by an ascetic party formed in reaction to the Corinthian licentious- ness.^ In any case, it seems likely that the present 1 iii, 7, 8. =* Lake, Tlie earlier epistles of Paul, p. 81 (Rivingtons.) 137 STUDIES m PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY earth with its numerous ties and cares — "The things of this "world '' (vii, 34) appeared as of secondary interest in the light of the momentous changes which were imminent. The great Eesurrection chapter reaffirms his belief that the Day will come within the life-time of many to whom he writes, and probably within his own, for in addition to the change which the dead undergo when "this corruptible shall put Time. On incorruption," a corresponding transformation takes place in the case of the living. " We shall not all sleep but we shall all be changed " (verse 51)/ This particular phase of the expectation seems, in the opinion of Charles, to go through some modification in the second epistle. The connection of the Parousia with judgment, and with Christ as Judge, together with the fact that judgment is based upon the life on earth is still invariable, but it looks as if the apostle had serious misgivings PossiDie as to his former time-view, and expected not so change in ^ the concept much the dissolution of his body before the of Parousia. '^ "manifestation of Christ/' as the immediate passage at death from this earthly condition to the resurrection life. Death is indeed in his own case a possibility. The turbulent riots at Ephesus^ narrated in the 19th chapter of Acts 1 See further discussion under ctwuo. 2 ' ' But in that hour of the peril of death at Ephesus, the apostle had been obliged to look the possibility of death straight in the face and in the Second Epistle to the Corin- thians the prospect of death occupies him very deeply.'* Weinel, Paul, p. 381. 138 LARGER ESCHATOLOGICAL CONCEPTS which probably occurred between the writing of the two epistles may have led the apostle to think that such violent persecution might at any time end fatally for him. Nevertheless, this is not the point emphasized. The expectation, as stated on page 86, rather takes on the form of an abandon- ment of the Jewish view of an intermediate state, and in place of it the hope of a "building of God " following direct upon the passing away of the earthly tabernacle.^ In any case the change of outlook is not stated with declarative certainty, as the apostle would seem to admit the possibility of the standpoint of Thessalonians towards the end of the section. " Whether also we make it our aim, whether at home or absent to be well- pleasing to him.^' The letter to the Romans lays greater stress upon the retributive character of the judgment. It is a " day of wrath and revelation of the Romans. righteous judgment of God who will render to every man according to his works, to them that by patient well-doing seek for glory and honor and incorruption, eternal life, but unto them that are factious and obey not the truth, .... wrath and indignation, tribulation and anguish" (ii, 5-9). It is a day "when God shall judge the secrets of men" (ii, 16). Whether Paul's expec- tation here refers to his lifetime or subsequent thereto is not perfectly clear. The 11th verse of the 8th chapter might be interpreted to lengthen Time. ^ Findlay, I Corinthians, Expos. Greek Testament, p. 940. 139 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY Time. Colossians. Ephesians. the interval beyond his death. " But if the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwelleth in you^ he that raised up Christ Jesus from the dead shall give life also to your mortal bodies through his spirit that dwelleth in you." The 13th chapter, 11-13 goes back to First Thessalonians : "And this, knowing the season, that already it is time for you to awake out of sleep, for now is salvation nearer to us than when we believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand." There are no data in Colossians to determine the modifications, if any, in this aspect of the apostle's conceptions since writing Eomans. The hope laid up " in the heavens "" is still held out to his readers : — " When Christ who is our life shall be manifested, then shall ye also with him be manifested in glory/' but the nearness or remoteness of its realization is not discussed. Ephesians has sometimes been cited as an instance of Paul's rejection of the Parousia hope, and of a newly arisen belief in an indefinitely long continuance of the present earth. Bruce, for example, thinks that." a trace of the concep- tion of a protracted Christian era may be dis- covered in the words of Ephesians iii, 21; ^To him be glory in the church, and in Christ Jesus unto all the generations of the age of the ages.' "^ But, on the other hand, " the idea of the Parousia may be behind all, the age (o altav) being the ^ Bruce, St. Paul's Conception of Christianity, p. 382. 140 LAKGER ESCHATOLOGICAL CONCEPTS Messianic age which opens with the Parousia, brings all other ages with the generations belong- ing to them to an end, and is itself to endure for ever. Thus as Meyer puts it, the idea is that the glory to be given to God in the church and in Christ, its head, is to endure ' not only to the Parousia but then also ever onward from generation to generation in the Messianic aeon.'"^ Philippians returns to the conception of ^^^pp^*"""' II Corinthians v, 1-10 in that the anticipation of death intervenes between the time of his writ- ing and the end. But there is nothing to indicate that The Day is to be postponed to any consider- able length. It is indeed near (Philippians iv, 5), and that fact is as ever the ground of his exhor- tation to patience, but Paul's advancing age together with the manifold dangers of persecu- tion made death a contingency quite within the limits of probability. The same thought of the Second Epistle to the Corinthians is repeated. " Christ shall be magnified in my body whether by life or by death" (i, 20). Lightfoot thus paraphrases the passage : — ^^" If I consulted my own longing I should desire to dissolve this earthly tabernacle and to go home to Christ, for this is very far better. If I consulted your interests I should wish to live and labor still ; for this your needs require."^ The later epistles ^ Salmond, Ephesians, EipoB. Greek Testament, p. 319. ^ Philippians, p. 92. 141 STUDIES IN PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY The Messianic Kingdom. Thessalon- ians. show very little tendency to work in elaborate imagery as a background to the Day of the Lord. The apostle seemed to have ignored this side of the expectation after Second Thessalonians. Even in the First Epistle to the Corinthians when the question of the Eesnrrection presented a fine field for this phase of the speculation, descriptive minutise so dear to the apocalyptist are not worked out, and in the closing letters, beyond the use of occasional phrases epitomizing the Parousia, the drama has lost practically all its setting. Turning now to another main concept of Paul we find that the term, Pao-iXcta^ although occur- ring comparatively seldom in the Pauline epistles, yet wherever ^o used includes both present and eschatological features.^ The Thessalonian letters bring out the future aspect of the kingdom which is initiated by the d-n-oKaXvij/Ls of Jesus. " To the end that ye should walk worthily of God who calleth you into his own kingdom and glory ^^ (I Thessalonians ii, 12). To be delivered from the coming wrath, and " to be for ever with the Lord " is the hope of their glorying. Parti- cipation in that kingdom is the recompense of their patient suffering. " To the end that ye may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God for which ye also suffer^' (II Thessalonians i, 5). Note the parallel in Luke xx, 35, commented on by Dalman,^ where the statement of Jesus is ^ Matthews, Messianic Hope, p. 167 ff. = Words of Jesus, p. 118 ff. E. T. 142 LAKGER ESCHATOLOGICAL COISTCEPTS regarded as distinctly eschatological. It is an inheritance into which the wicked cannot enter. Gaiatians. " As I did forewarn you that they who practise such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God" (Galatians v, 21). " Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived; neither fornicators nor idolatorsj . . . shall inherit the kingdom of God" ( I Corinthians vi, 9, 10). '''Now this Ii corintn- say brethren that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God" (I Corinthians xv, 50). Usually the thought of the future is expressed by such terms and phrases as ^(^^v, a-ayrrjpLa^ cts (TtOTrjptav^ Soga^ airoXvTpoxrtSj €ts rifxipav awoXyTpiafrews which sums up the blessings of the Messianic kingdom.^ Concurrently with the eschatological treatment ^® present runs the view of the present and earthly life of the Christian as comprising the kingdom of God. " For the kingdom is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and Joy in the Holy Spirit" (Romans xiv, 17), and probably (Colos- sians i, 13) '' Who delivered us out of the power of darkness and translated us into the kingdom of the Son of his love." The two phases are not antithetic. The kingdom is already begun in the life of the Christian, and the presence of the Spirit is the pledge of the final consummation which is realized in the new ason soon to be inaugurated." For if by the trespass of one, ^ Kennedy, St. Paul's Conception of the Last TMngs, cap. i. 143 STUDIES m PAULINE ESCHATOLOGY death reigned by one, much more shall they that receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one, even Jesus Christ" (Eomans v, 17). "And not only so, but ourselves also, who have the first-fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the Sonship, the redemption of our body" (Eomans viii, 23). "And grieve not the Holy Spirit in whom ye were sealed unto the day of redemption" (Ephesians iv, 30). In this two-fold setting of the present and the future life, where should the thought of the apostle in I Corinthians xv, 34-26 be placed? It is generally acknowledged that the eschatological ySao-tXeta or more strictly, the consummated pa