!^'i:i^' 
 
djorttf U Ulam 0rl|ool library 
 
KF lOLZ^PsI" ""'""""' """'* 
 * TiHiii'iNlNS!iiJt'iS,,.W,?n.SeFJi!elJn...t!ie Uni 
 
The original of tliis book is in 
 tine Cornell University Library. 
 
 There are no known copyright restrictions in 
 the United States on the use of the text. 
 
 http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924022843514 
 
The Publisher asks attention to the following; letter to 
 the Author from the Chief Justice and Associate Justices 
 of the Supreme Court of the United States : 
 
 In compliance with yonr request we have examined some of tlie 
 proof-sheets of yonr forriicoming ManuaIj of the DECISIONS OF THE 
 Supreme Court of the United States, a work nndertalien by jon 
 at the suggestion of some of tlie members of the Court. We talve 
 pleasure in saying, as the result of that examination, that hi our opin- 
 ion your book will, prove to be a great time-saver as well for the 
 Courts as for the Profession. It is often desirable to trace a particnlar 
 rilling through the volumes of the Supi-eme Court Reports, and to ascer- 
 tain how often, and for what purpose, the case in which it was originally 
 Hnnouiiccd lias been r'eferred to in subsequent decisions of the Court. 
 That want will, wo think, be met by .your book. 
 YoiM'S truly, 
 
 M. R. WAITE. 
 
 SAM. F. MILLER. 
 
 STEPHEN J. FIELD. 
 
 JOSEPH P. BRADLEY. 
 
 .JOHN M. HARLAN. 
 
 W. B. WOODS. 
 
 STANLEY MATTHEWS. 
 

 tif iiiK cvsKs in<:cirn<:n iv tiik ■'^'\>y 
 
 United States Supreme Court 
 
 AMI <r Vl•■.^^ 
 
 IN OTHER CASES IN THE SAME COURT, 
 
 WITH THE POINTS Or RKFRHKNCE. 
 
 From 2 Dallas to 103 U. S. (13 Otto) Reports. 
 
 BY 
 
 W. Hallett Phillips, 
 
 ClU-NSKI.I.UIi (IF TIIK rNITKIl STATES KUPHUMK rdl'llT. 
 
 WASlItXCrTOX, D. r. : 
 
 WjLLiAJf II. Morrison, Law IJookseli.eb and I'ubltrhp^k. 
 
 lS8:i. 
 
 1605 
 
Kiitered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1882, by 
 
 W. Hallett Phillips, 
 
 In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. 
 
 pREiR OF Thouir MoOill a Co , 
 Ijw Pbistehb, 
 
 wabiiington, d. 0. 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 The Reports of the United States Supreme Court now number 
 one hundred and three volumes, containing many thousands of 
 • cases. It is the object of the present work — undertaken at the 
 suggestion of several of the Justices of the Supreme Court — 
 to aflFord the practitioner a ready means of reference to this 
 great body of authority, containing as it does the highest exposi- 
 tion of the law of the land. 
 
 The plan adopted is to give all the decisions of the Court 
 referred to in the subsequent opinions, with a brief statement of 
 the various points for which reference is made. The different 
 points are denoted by different letters. For greater convenience 
 the cases cited £tre given under both the name of plaintiff and 
 defendant. 
 
 The first column contains the cases cited and the points for 
 which they are cited. The parallel column contains in chron- 
 ological order the cases in which the citations are made. The 
 cases given do not include tho.se mentioned in dissenting opin- 
 ions. 
 
 W. HALLETT PHILLIPS. 
 
 Washington. 
 
ERRATA. 
 
 PAGE. 
 
 1 ABIEMAN V. BOOTH, same as U. S. v. Booth. 
 
 16 BANK OF U. S. v. SIMS, 6 P., should be 6 H. 
 
 16 CUKRAN V. ARKANSAS, 15 P., should be 15 H. 
 
 16 BICE V. MINN. R. R., 81 P., should be Zl H. 
 
 23 PEYTON V. STITH, 11 P., should be 5 P. 
 
 In several places, 93, 97, and 108 Wall, occur for 93, 97, and 
 108 U. S. 
 
M: A]SrTJA.L 
 
 OF THE 
 
 DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT 
 
 OP 
 
 THE UNITED STATES. 
 
 ABBOTSFOKD, THE, 98 U. S. 440. 
 
 Admiralty; finding of facts ; act a 102 U. 
 of lS7o ; (IS St. 315 ;) review by the a 102 U. 
 Supreme Conit. a. 
 
 ABBOTT, HANGER v. See Hanger v. Abbott. 
 ABEBCROMSIE v. DUPUIS, 1 Cr. 343. 
 
 201, The Clara. 
 218, The Benefactor. 
 
 U. S. couits ; jurisdiction, citi- 
 zenship, a 
 
 ABI.BMAN V. BOOTH, 21 H. 506. 
 
 TJ. S. courts; it belongs to the 
 Federal courts to determine their 
 own jurisdiction; conflict of juris- 
 diction, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; return of writ of 
 error. 6 
 
 Constitution ; States and general 
 governmerit ; powers of. c 
 
 Habeas corpus, d 
 
 a 8 P. 112, Brown v. Keene. 
 
 a 24 H. 460, Freeman v. Howe. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 196, Eiggs v. Johnson 
 Co. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 253, Mayor v. Cooper. 
 
 6 6 Wall. 360, Mussina v. Cava- 
 zos. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 403, Tarble's Case. 
 
 c 91 U. S. 372, Kohl v. U. S. 
 
 d 93 U. S. 24, Parks, ex parte. 
 
 c 93 U. S. 137, Claflin v. House- 
 man . 
 
 d 100 U. S. 375, Siebold, ex parte. 
 
 ACHISON V. HUDDIiESOX, 13 H. 893. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- I a 21 Wall, 
 tracts; exemptions from taxation. a\ 
 ADAMS, BABXARD v. See Barnard v. Adams. 
 ADAMS V. JONES, 12 P. 207. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 Contracts by letter, b 
 
 498, Erie K. K. Co. v. 
 Pennsylvania. 
 
 ADAMS V. 'L.AW, 16 H. 
 
 Supersedeas, a 
 
 148. 
 
 a 12 P. 238, White v. T(n-k. 
 a 5 H. 209, U. S. v. Briggs. 
 a 18 H. 566, Dennistoun v. Stew- 
 art. 
 b 101 U. S. 48, Nat. Bank v. Hall. 
 
 a 23 H. 1, Anson v. Blue Eidge E. 
 
 E. Co. 
 a 10 Wall. 291, Slaughter-house 
 
 a 19 Wall. 427, Tel. Co. v. Eyser. 
 a 93 U. S. 88, Kitchen v. Eandolph. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPEEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 ADAMS V. I,AW, 17 H. 419. 
 
 Wills, " grandchildren," " is- I a 1 Bl. 256, Bogers v. Law. 
 sue." a I 
 
 ADAMS, lilFE & FIRE DJS. CO, v. See Life & Fire Ins. Co. v. Adams. 
 ADAMS, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Adams. 
 ADDISON, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Addison. 
 ADEIA, THE, 6 "WaU. 366. 
 
 Captures in neutral waters, a \ alOl U. S. 42, The Florida. 
 
 ADBLrNB, THE, 9 Cr. 886. 
 
 Masters of vessels; when they 
 can act for consignees, a 
 
 Admiralty; instance court. 6 
 
 Proceedings in rem.; release of 
 property on stipulation, c 
 
 ADGBB V. ALSTON, 16 WaU. 560. 
 
 Limitations; suspension of stat- a 15 Wall. 610, Holdanes). Surauer. 
 ute dui-ing the civil war. a « 18 Wall. 106, Masterson v. Hern- 
 
 don. 
 a 19 Wall. 525, Burke v. Milten- 
 
 berger. 
 a 22 Wall. 587, Ross v. Jones. 
 a 92 U. S. 115, Harrison v. Myer. 
 
 a 11 H. 525, Speare v. Place. 
 b 5 Wall. 71, U. S. v. Weed, 
 c 99 U. S. 43, U. S. V. Ames. 
 
 ADMIBAl, THE, 3 Wall. 613. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals, i 
 Admiralty jurisdiction. 6 
 
 331. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 342, Merrill v. Petty. 
 6 99 U. S. 33, U. S. v. Ames. 
 6 101 U. S. 458, City of Panama. 
 
 ADVENXtlBE, THE, 8 Cr, 
 
 Prize; salvage., a | a 1 Wh. 123, The Astrea. 
 
 ^TNA CO., AliDKICH v. See Aldrioh v. .ffiltna Co. 
 AGAGAM CO. v. JOBDON, 1 WaU. 596. 
 
 Patent law ; practice ; defense of 
 pi'evious invention ; how made, a 
 Invention by employ^. 6 
 Use befoi-e application for pat- 
 ent, c 
 
 ALABAJMCA ASTD GAMECOCK, THE, 
 
 Collision ; damage to third party ; 
 how apportioned, a 
 
 a 8 Wall. 427, Blanchard v. Put- 
 nam. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 539, Seymours. Osborne. 
 
 6 23 Wall. 564, Collar Co. u. Van" 
 Dusen. 
 
 c 94 U. S. 94, Consolidated Fruit Jar 
 Co. V. Wright. 
 
 92 V. S. 695. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 317, The Atlas. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 317, The Virginia Ehr- 
 man. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 329, The City of Hart- 
 ford. 
 
 ALABAMA. V. GEOBGIA, 33 H. 606. 
 
 Supreme Court, original jurisdic- a 11 Wall, 
 tion ; suits between States ; bound- 
 aries, a 
 
 ALBANY CO., tABAMIE CO. v. See Laramie Go. 
 ALDBICH V. ^TNA CO., 8 WaU. 491. 
 
 55, Virginia v. 
 Virginia. 
 
 I. Albany Co. 
 
 West 
 
 Shipping; enroUmeJit and regis- 
 try of ships; power of Congress, a 
 
 AiDEIDGE V. WHitlAMS, 3 H. 33. 
 
 Eevenne laws; repeal by impli- 
 cation, a 
 
 Statutes ; construction ; history 
 of the time when passed. 6 
 
 a 21 Wall. 578, The Lottawanna. 
 
 a 22 H. 311, U. S. v. Walker. 
 
 b 91 U. S. 79, U. S. V. Pac. E. K. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 196, Fabbri v. Murphy 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 AXEGKB, KASISEY v. See Ramsey v. Alegre. 
 AlEXAJOJER V. BAXXIMOBE INS. CO., 4 Cr. 370. 
 
 Marine insurance; abandon- i a 12 P. 391, Bradlie v. Maryland 
 ment. a \ Ins. Co. 
 
 AlEXAJVDEB, CONWAY v. See Conway v. Alexander. 
 AI,EXA]ST>ER, MTTLE v. See Little v. Alexander. 
 AUEXANDEK, IXOYD v. See Lloyd v. Alexander, 
 AUEXAJTDEB, OLFVEB v. See Oliver v. Alexander. 
 AliEXANDEK'S COTTON, 3 Wall. 404. 
 
 Tlie civil war ; who are considered 
 enemies, a 
 
 Admiralty and prize jurisdic- 
 tion. 6 
 
 Natui'e of tlie war. c 
 
 Cotton ; proper subject of cap- 
 ture, d 
 
 a 5 Wall. 60, The Peterhoff. 
 
 6 5 Wall. 71, U. S. v. Weed. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 532, Ouachita Cotton. 
 
 c 7 Wall. 554, Coppell v. Hall. 
 
 d 9 Wall. 540, U. S. v. Padelford. 
 
 c 20 Wall. 395, N. O. e. Steam. Co. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 96, Hamilton v. Dillon. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 3.51, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 
 d 22 Wall. 93, Haycratt v. U. S. 
 
 d 97 Wall. 5S, Young v. U. S! 
 
 d 97 Wall. 605, Ford v. Surget. 
 ALEXANDRIA, DOWNHAM T. See Downham i). Alexandria. 
 ALEXANDRIA, EOTFLE v. See Fowle v. Alexandria, 
 ALEXANDRIA v. PATTON, 4 Cr. 317. 
 
 Application of payments, a I a 5 P. 304, Page v. Patton. 
 
 I a 7 H. 684, Jones v. U. S. 
 ALEXANDRIA CANAL CO., GEORGETOWN v. See Georgetown v. Alexan- 
 dria Canal Co. 
 
 ALEXAJSDRIA CAIfAL CO. v. SWANN, 5 H. 89. 
 
 Arbitrators; reference by court, a | a 2 Wall. 128, Heckersu. Fowler. 
 
 ALICIA, THE, 7 WaU. 573. 
 
 Supreme Court ; dismissal of case I a 9 Wall. 504, The Nonesuch, 
 transferred by consent, a \ 
 
 ALLEGHANY, AMEY v. See Amey v. Alleghany;. 
 ALLEN, HALL v. See Hall v. Allen. 
 ALLEN, LAWRENCE v. See Lawrence v. Allen. 
 ALLEN V. MASSEY, 17 WaU. 353. 
 
 U. S. courts ; when bound by the I a 91 U. S. 453, Townsend v. Todd, 
 decisions of the State courts, a \ 
 
 ALLEN V. NEWBERRY, 31 H. 345. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; contract 
 of affreightment between ports 
 within a State, a 
 
 a 21 H. 249, Maguire v. Card. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 641, The Belfast. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 545, Lord v. Steam. Co. 
 
 ALLEN, PALMER v. See Palmer v. AUen. 
 ALLEN, SCHUCHARDTS v. See Sclmohardts v. Allen. 
 ALLEN, WALLINGFORD v. See Wa^lingford v. AUen. 
 ALLING, RAILWAY CO. v. See Railway Co. v. Ailing. 
 AXLING SHERLOCK v. See Sherlock v. Ailing. 
 ALLIS V. INS. CO., 97 V. 8. 144. 
 
 Supreme Court ; will not reverse I a ICn U. S. 752, Goddard v. Or,d- 
 for immaterial error, a | way. 
 
 ALLISON, TERRILL v. See Terrill v. Allison. 
 ALMEIDA, MANRO v. See Manro v. Almeida. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPEEME COtJET DECISIONS. 
 
 AlMOJfESTER V. KENTON, d fi. I. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error 
 to State courts; how the Federal 
 question must appear, a 
 
 Opinion of Supreme Court of 
 Ijoulsiana considered as part of 
 the record, b 
 
 AIMY T. CALIFORNIA, 84 H. 173. 
 
 Constitution ; State tax on im- 
 ports; regulation of commerce. . a 
 
 19 H. 259, Bell v. Hearne. 
 
 14 Wall. 667, Delmas v. Ins. Co. 
 
 8 Wall. 122, 
 
 8 Wall. 137, 
 
 13 Wall. 34, 
 15 Wall. 280, 
 
 92 U.S. 376, 
 94U.S.541. 
 
 The 
 
 Par- 
 
 Waring V. 
 Mayoy. 
 
 Woodruff V. 
 ham. 
 
 Low V. Austin. 
 
 State Freight Tax 
 Case. 
 
 Pace V. B\irgess. 
 
 Doyle V. Continen- 
 tal Ins. Co. 
 a 100 D. S. 95. Trade-marlv Cases. 
 
 AXSTON, ADGEB v. See Adger v. Alston, 
 AXVISO V. V. S., 6 Wall. 457. 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error 
 and appeals ; docketing ; dismissal ; 
 reinstatement. _ a 
 AXVISO V. V. S., 8 Wall. 339. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; con- 
 Jirmations ; location of grants, a 
 AJWEDY, VS. S. V. See U. S. v. Amedy. ' 
 AMEMA, THE, 1 Cr. S5. 
 
 Prize ; salvage, a 
 
 Evidence ; foreign laws and ordi- 
 nances. 6 
 
 Supreme Court; review of facts, c 
 
 Seizures ; probable cause, d 
 
 AMELIE, THE, 6 WaU. SO. 
 
 Admiralty; liens on proceeds of 
 sale, a \ 
 
 AMERICAN BRIDGE CO. V. HEIDEIBACH, 94 U. S. 798, 
 
 . Kailroads; mortgage of earn- 1 a 98 U. S. 253, Fosdick w. Schall 
 ings. a 
 
 AMERICAN EUR CO. v. V. S., % P. 
 
 Agency; when act of agent is 
 act of principal, a 
 
 Evidence ; co-conspirators. 6 
 
 Indians ; rigiit of U. S. to grant 
 the fee of their lands, c 
 
 10 Wall. 426, U. S. v. Vigil. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 214, Snyder v. Sickles. 
 a 101 U. S. 807, Trenier K.Stewart. 
 
 a 2 Cr. 64, Murray v. Charming 
 
 Betsy. 
 6 14 H. 412, Ennis v. Smitli. 
 c 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 d 97 U. S. 647, Stacey u. Emery. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 221,' Lottowanna. 
 
 AMERICAN INS. CO. v. CANTER, 1 
 
 Jurisdiction of admiraltj' ; sal- 
 vage, a 
 
 Power of Congress over the Ter- 
 ritories. 6 
 
 Territorial courts, c 
 
 Supreme Ct. U. S. ; appeals from 
 decree executing mandate, d 
 
 364. 
 
 a 21 H. 165, Barreda v. Silsbee. 
 a 22 H. 82, Morrill u. Cone. 
 a 3 Wall. 140, Cliquot's Cham- 
 pagne. 
 a 13 Wall. 550, Stoekwell v. U. S. 
 6 01 U. S. 438, Nudd v. Burrows, 
 c 95 U. S. 208, Bates u. Clark. 
 
 P. 541. 
 
 o 3 P 
 al2P 
 
 307, Canter u. Ani. Ins. Co. 
 72, U. S. 0. Coombs. 
 h 14 P. 534, U. S. V. Gratiot, 
 c 9 H. 239, Benner v. Portei-. 
 d 15 H. 464, Corning v. 'J'roy Iron 
 and Nail Factory. 
 6 16 H. 181, Cross v. Harrison. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, 
 
 Judicial power of the U. S. e 
 Statutes; construction. / 
 Treaties, g 
 
 Laws of conquered countiy con- 
 tinue in force until changud. Ti 
 
 e 17 H. o31, U. S. v. Kitchie. 
 6 19 H. U->, Dred Scott v. Sand- 
 ford. 
 d 20 H. 480, Roberts v. Cooper, 
 c 1 Wall. 77, Orchard clinches. 
 / 11 Wail. 507, Stewart v. Kahn. 
 c 13 Wall. 447, Clinton v. En^le- 
 
 bricht. 
 & 16 Wall. 434, U. S. v. Hnckabee. 
 g n Wall. 247, Holden v. Joy. 
 h 9S U. S. 15, Palmer v. Low. 
 c 98 U. S. 154, Reynolds v. U. S. 
 clOl U. S. 458, City of Panama. 
 See Canter v. American Ins. Co. 
 
 See Moore v. American Trans. Co. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 397, U. S. v. 
 leans. 
 
 New Or- 
 
 AMDEKICAIf INS. CO., CANTER t. 
 AMEBICAJf TEANS. CO., MOOKE V. 
 AMEY V. AXUEGHANT, 34 H. 364. 
 
 Miuiicipal corporations ; aid to 
 railroads; limit to taxation; pro- 
 liibition to create debt witliont pro- 
 viding means for its payment, a 
 
 AMIABUE ISABEM.A, THE, 6 Wh. 1. 
 
 Treaty with Spain, 1795. a | a 15 P. 592, U. S. v. The Amlstad. 
 
 AMTABtE NANCY, THE, 3 WU. 546. 
 
 Murine torts; damages, a 
 
 AMIS V. SMITH, 16 P. 318. 
 
 U. S. courts; process; acts 1789, 
 1828. a 
 
 Misjoinder of parties ; nolle pro- 
 sequi, b 
 
 a 5 Wh. 385, La Amistad de Rues. 
 
 o 1 H. 304, Duncan v. Darst. 
 
 a 2 H. 611, McCracken v. Hay- 
 ward. 
 
 a 7 H. 714, Town.send v. Jcnnl- 
 son. 
 
 a 14 H. 337, Harris v. Hardeman. 
 
 6 17 H. 610, Griffin v. Reynolds. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 202, Gold-washing Co. 
 V. Keycs. 
 
 AMOBY V. AMOBY, 95 U. S. 186. 
 
 Removals ; wliat petition .«honld 1 
 set forth, a | 
 
 AJOKOYI), WILUAlMS v. See Williams v. Amroyd. 
 AMY, BATH CO. V. See Bath Co. v. Amy. 
 AMY, GAXENA v. See G-alena v. Amy. 
 AMY, PENDLETON CO. v. See Pendleton Oo. v. Amy. 
 ANDERSON, BOYCE v. See Boyce v. Anderson. 
 ANDERSON, HARDEMAN v. See Hardeman v. Anderson. 
 ANDERSON, HENDERSON v. See Henderson v. Anderson. 
 ANDERSON, HOOENAGLE v. See Hoolnagle v. Anderson. 
 ANDERSON, McMXLI.AN T. See McMillan v. Anderson. 
 ANDEBSON, MONTGOMEBY T. See Montgomery ». Anderson. 
 ANDERSON, TERRY v. See Terry v. Anderson. 
 ANDERSON, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Anderson. 
 ANDERSON, W^ALLACE v. See 'Wallace v. Anderson. 
 ANDREWS V. HENSI.ER, 6 Wall. 854. 
 
 Contracts; upon what law valid- I « 13 Wall. 657, Osborn v. Nichol- 
 ity of, depends, a | 
 
 ANDREWS, JONES V. See Jones ii. Andrews. 
 
 son. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 ANDREWS V. POND, 13 P. US. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; note overdue. 
 a 
 
 Usury. & 
 
 Notice, in g;eneral, a qiiestion of 
 construction for the court, c 
 
 Contracts, by What law govern- 
 ed ; as to usury, d 
 
 ANDREWS V. WAIL, 8 H. S73. 
 
 Admiralty ; supplemental suits 
 to ascei-tain ownership of proceeds 
 of sale, a 
 
 a 14 P. 318, Fowler v. Branlty. 
 6 13 H. 163, Buckingham v. Mc- 
 Lean, 
 c 20 H. 364. Goodman v. Simonds. 
 c 22 H. 108, B'k of Pittsb'g v. Neal 
 d 1 Wall. 810, Miller v. Tiffany. 
 d 91 U. S. 412, Scndder v. Union 
 
 Nat. Bank. 
 a 92 U. S. 342, Anglo v. Mut. Life 
 
 Ins. Co. 
 6 93 U. S. 347, Cockle v. Flack, 
 c 94 U. S. 758, Collins v. Gilbert. 
 c 95 U. S. 488, Brown v. Spofford. 
 a 99 U. S. 441, ParSonsu. Jackson. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 223, The Lottowanna. 
 
 ANGEIilQUE, THE, SCHUCHARDT v. See Schuchardt v. The AngeUque. 
 ANN, THE BRIG, 9 Cr. 890. 
 
 Admiralty; proceedings in rem.; I a 23 Wall. 464, The Elo Grande, 
 seizure, a | a 96 U. S. 396, Dobbins Distillery. 
 
 ANN CAROI.INE, THE, H Wall. 648. 
 
 Collision ; sailing vessels and 
 steamers, a 
 Damages. 6 
 Stipulators; liability, c 
 
 a 4 Wail, oil, Bentley ». Coyne. 
 6 8 Wall. 385, The Baltimore, 
 c 14 Wall. 418, The Webb, 
 c 95 wall. 605, The Wanata. 
 c 99 Wall. 41, U. S. v. Ames. 
 
 ANNA MARIA, THE, 8 Wh. 387. 
 
 Mai-ine torts ; damages, a 
 
 ANNE, THE, 3 Wt. 444. 
 
 Prize ; capture in neutral waters. 
 a 
 
 ANTELOPE, THE, 10 Wh. 66. 
 
 Prize; slave trade, a 
 Supreme Court U. S. ; divided 
 court. 6 
 Consuls, c 
 
 I a 3 Wh. 546, The Amiable Nancy. 
 I a 101 U. S. 42, The Florida. 
 
 a 12 Wh. 546, The Antelope, 
 
 6 3 H. 424, Washington Bridge 
 
 Co. V. Stewart, 
 c 9 H. 382, Harrison v. Vose. 
 6 7 Wall. 112, Duraut v. Essex 
 
 Co. 
 a 13 Wall. 657, Osboru v. Nichol- 
 son. 
 
 ANTELOPE, THE, 
 
 U. S. : costs, a 
 
 18 Wh. 646. 
 
 ANTHONY, HANDLEY v. 
 ANTHONY V. JASPER CO 
 
 I a 8 P. 163, IT. 
 See Handley v. Anthony. 
 ., 101 V. S. 693. 
 
 S. V. Ringold. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads; invalidity; riglit 
 to recover bad; money paid to the 
 city, a 
 
 ANTHONY MAN^ZCf, THE. See U. S. v. Grundy. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 298, Louisiana u.Wobds. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 APOU.ON, THE, 9 Wll. 368. 
 
 Suit against a State, a 
 
 Marine torts; action in perso- 
 natn. b 
 
 Prize ; captures ; probable cause. 
 c 
 
 Judicial notice, d 
 
 a 9 Wh. 870, Osboni u. U. S. Bank. 
 6 10 Wh. 473. Mann v. Almeida, 
 c 12 Wll. 1, The Palmyra. 
 d 7 P. 324, Peyroux v. Howard, 
 c 3 Wall. 162, Tlie Thompson. 
 e 17 Wall. 93, Averill c. Smith, 
 c 97 U. S. 643, Stacey v. Emery. 
 
 APPEAX TAX COURT, GORDON v. See Gordon v. Appeal Tax Court. 
 APPOMATTOX R. R. CO., POWHATAN STEAMBOAT CO. v. See Pow 
 
 hatan Steamboat Co. v. Appomattox R. R. Co. 
 ARCA5IBEL v. WTSEMAN, 3 Dall. 306. 
 
 Damages; counsel fees, a | a 15 Wall. 230, Oelriehs v. Spain. 
 
 ARGtrKLLO V. V. S., 18 H. 540. 
 
 Crux Cervan- 
 
 a 18 H. 554, U. S. v. 
 
 tes. 
 6 19 H. 345, U. S. v. Peralta. 
 c 24 H. 126, Palmer v. U. S. 
 c 24 H. 273, Greer v. Mezes. 
 d 24 H. 434, Suydam v. Williamson. 
 
 California land titles; Mexican 
 concession within "the ten littoral 
 leagues." a 
 
 Inchoate titles. 6 
 
 Definitive title, c 
 
 U. S. courts; when they will fol- 
 low decision of the State court as a 
 rule of property, d 
 
 ARGUEUDO, U. S. v. See U. S. i). Arguello. 
 ARIADNE, THE, 13 WaU. 479. 
 
 Collision; tug; liability of tow. a { a 91 U. S. 221, The Sunnj'side. 
 ARKANSAS, CURRAN v. See Curran v. Arkansas. 
 ARKANSAS, LTTTLE v. See Lyttle v. Arkansas. 
 ARMOR, PARSONS v. See Parsons v. Armor. 
 ARMOUR, BRIDGES v. See Bridges v. Armour. 
 ARMOUR, McGELI. v. See McGill v. Armour. 
 ARMSTRONG v. LEAR, 13 Wh. 175. 
 
 Wills, evidence of. a I a 9 P. 174, Tarver v. Tarver. 
 
 Legacy, action tor. 6 | 6 2 H. 640, Gaines v. Chew. 
 
 ARMSTRONG V. TOLBR, 11 Wh. 358. 
 
 Contracts, illegality, a 
 
 ARMSTRONG'S FOUNDRY, 6 WaU. 
 
 Confiscation act of 1862; proceed- 
 ings under; jiu'isdiction of District 
 Courts, a 
 
 Pardon ; effect of. b 
 
 Confiscation ; Supieme Court can 
 onlj' review by writ of error, c 
 
 Reversals by Supreme Court, d 
 
 a 13 P. 161, Ocean Ins. Co. v. Pol- 
 leys. 
 a 22 H. 269, Kira'bro v. Bullitt. 
 a 7 Wall. 559, Coppell v. Hall. 
 a 12 Wall. 348, Hannauer u.Doane. 
 a 16 Wall. 500, Planters' Bank v. 
 Union Bank. 
 
 769, 
 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 
 6 Wall. 772, U. S. v. Hart. 
 
 7 Wall. 462, Confiscation Cases. 
 7 Wall. 579, Morris & Johnson 
 
 V. U. S. 
 
 a S Wall. 511, Morris's Cotton. 
 6 9 Wall. 543, U. S. v. Padelford. 
 a 10 Wall. 543, Graham, ex parte, 
 e 11 Wall. 258, Garnett v. V. S. 
 a 11 Wall. 304, Miller w. U. S. 
 a 16 Wall. 165, Gariiharts v. U. S. 
 d 23 Wall. 164, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 6 95 U. S. 153, Knote v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 ARMSTKONG v. TREASURER ATHENS CO., 16 P. 881. 
 
 Constitution, obligation of con- a 6 H. 318, Planters' Bank v. 
 tracts, taxation of corporations ; Sharp, 
 
 when the power is implied, a 6 7 H. 590, Kennedy v. Hunt. 
 
 Writ of error to State courts ; 6 7 H. 740, Smith v. Hunter, 
 how the Federal question must ap- 6 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 pear; jurisdiction under the twenty- 6 12 H. 102, Neilson ». Lagow. 
 fifth section of judiciary act. 6 ' 6 12 H. 166, Grand OJulf R. R. & 
 
 Bank Co. v. Mar- 
 shall. 
 6 14 H. 152, Lawler v. Walker. 
 6 15 H. 305, Currant). Armstrong. 
 6 19 H. 259, Belli;. Hearne. 
 6 20 H. 27, Christ Chuich v. Phil- 
 adelphia. 
 6 21 H. 291, Lownsdale v. Parrish. 
 6 1 Wall. 143, Bridge Proprietors 
 
 u. Hoboken. 
 6 6 Wall. 128, Walkeri). Villavo.so. 
 6 14 Wall. 86, Hurley ». Street. 
 6 20 Wall. 628, Murdock v. Mem- 
 phis. 
 6 21 Wall. 638, Moore D.Mississippi. 
 6 96 U. S. 442, Miu-i'ay v. Charles- 
 ton. 
 
 ARMSTRONG v. U. S., 13 WaU. 155 
 
 Rebellion ; amnesty proclama- 
 tion, effect of. a 
 
 a 13 Wall. 157, Pargoud v. U. S. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 152, Carlisle v. U. S. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 153, Knote v. U. S. 
 ARNOED, DEL. COL. V. See Del. Ool. v. Arnold. 
 ARNOLD V. V. S; 9 Cr. 104. 
 
 a 13 P. 491, Meridith v: U. S. 
 6 17 Wall. 198, Lapeyre v. U. S. 
 6 94 U. S. 560, Dutcher v. Wright. 
 b 97 U. S. 384, Burgess v. Salmon. 
 
 Duties : time when they accrue. 
 a 
 
 Statutes; when they take eiFect ; 
 fractions of a day. 6 
 
 ARREDONDO, LEVY v. See Levy v. Arredondo. 
 ARREDONDO, V. S. v. See U. S. v. Arredondo. 
 ARTHUR, DAVIS v. See Davis v. Arthur. 
 ARTHUR, MEYER v. See Meyer v Arthur. 
 ARTHUR, MOVIUS v. See Movius v. Arthur. 
 ARTHUR v. RHEIMS, 96 U. S. 143. 
 
 Revenue; duties; designation of 1 a 97 U. S. 367, Arthur v. MoUer. 
 articles, a \ 
 
 ARTHUR V. SUSFIELD, 96 U. S. 139. 
 
 Revenue; tariff laws; designa- 1 a 97 U. S. 367, Arthurs). MoUer. 
 tion of articles, a \ 
 
 ARTHUR, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Arthur. 
 ARTHURS V. HART, 17 H. 6. 
 
 Supreme Court; appellate juris- a 18 H. 61, Graham v. Bayne. 
 diction in cases from Louisiana, a 6 20 H. 434, Suydam v. Williamson 
 Writs of error ; agreed case. 6 6 1 Wall. 103, Burr v. Des Moines' 
 
 6 4 Wall. 581, Newell v. Nixon. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 431, Flanders K. Tweed. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 ASHBY, COLUMBIA INS. CO. v. See Colnmbia Ins. Co v. Ashby. 
 
 ASHLEY, BARNAKD v. See Barnard v. Ashley. 
 
 ASHLEY, CUNNINGHAM v. See Cunningham v. Ashley. 
 
 ASHLEY, RECTOR v. See Eeotor i>, Ashley. 
 
 ASHTON, JACKSON v. See Jackson d. Ashton. 
 
 ASPDEN, BROWN v. See Brown v. Aspden. 
 
 ASPDEN V. NIXON, 4 H. 497. 
 
 Exfcutors; liabilit}- ; foreign ex- 
 ecutors, a 
 
 Admiiii^tnitioii in diftVrent Status 
 5 
 
 Estoppel by jirtlgment. c 
 
 Kes jiiilicata. d. 
 
 ASPINWALL V. DAVIESS CO., Sa H 
 
 County bonils issued in payment 
 of stoclv ill niihoad; effect of repeal 
 of riglit to subscribe ; bona-Jide 
 liolders. a 
 
 a 5 H. 2(50, Taylor v. Benliam. 
 6 6 H. 57, Stacy v. Tlirasher. 
 c 7 H. I-22, Wilkes v. Dinsnian. 
 a 13 H. 462, Hill v. Tucker. 
 d 24 H. 342, "Washington, Alex. 
 
 G. S. P. Co. 
 
 Sickles. 
 (! 7 Wall. 102, Aurora v. West. 
 
 374. 
 
 & 
 
 a 2 Bl. 724, Moran v. Miami Co. 
 a 92 U. S. 035, Moultrie v. Sav- 
 ings Bank. 
 a 102 U. S. 536, Wadsworth •«. Su- 
 pervisors. 
 
 ASPINTYALL, KNOX CO. v. See Knox Co. v. AspinwaU. 
 ASSESSORS V. OSBORNES, 9 WaU. 571. 
 
 Collectors; suits against, to re- 
 cover back taxes, a 
 
 Repeal of law conferring jurisdic- 
 tion ; pending cjises. 6 
 
 a 10 Wall. 444, Kimball v. Collect- 
 or. 
 a 10 Wall. 552, Baltimore v. Balti- 
 more K. R. Co. 
 a 12 Wall. 8, Collector v. Hub- 
 bard. 
 a 17 Wall. 307., Barnes u.Eailroads. 
 a 98 U. S. 225, Andrae v. Redlleld. 
 b 98 U. S. 401, K. K. Co. v. Grant. 
 ASSESSORS, VAN ALLEN v. See Van Allen v. Assessors, 
 ASTOR, CARVER v. See Carypr v. Jackson. 
 ASTOR, GRIGNON v. See Grignon u. Astor. 
 ATCHIXSON V. PETERSON, 80 Wall. 510. 
 
 Mining law ; 
 waters, a 
 
 right to use running 
 
 a 20 WaU. 681, Basey u. Gallagher. 
 a 101 U. S. 276, Broder v. Water 
 Co. 
 
 ATHERTON v. FOWLER, 91 U. S. 146. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error; [ a 93 U. S. 87, Kitchen u. Randolph, 
 citation, a \ 
 
 ATHERTON T. FOWLEB, 96 U. S. 513. 
 
 Public lands ; sale of. a 
 Pre-emption. 6 
 
 ATKINS V. DISINTEGRATING CO., 
 
 Statutes; construction, a 
 
 Constitution ; process by foreign 
 attachment; admiralty jurisdic- 
 tion; ratification of State legisla- 
 tion by Congres.s. b 
 
 ATLANTIC INS. CO., CONABD v. See Conard v. Atlantic Ine. Co, 
 
 a 96 U. S. 536, Moore v. Bobbins. 
 6 97 U. S. 580, Hosmer v. Wallace. 
 
 18 Wall. 301. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 380, Smythe v. Piske. 
 6 102 U. S. 575, Wilson v. McNamee. 
 
10 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 ATLAS, THE, 93 V. S. 319. 
 
 Collision ; when damages divided. 
 a 
 
 Damages foi- injuiy to innocent 
 party, o 
 
 a 94 U. S. 604, The Stephen Mor- 
 gan. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 317, The Virginia Ehr- 
 man. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 325, The City of Hart- 
 ford. 
 
 ATLEE V. PACKET CO., 81 WaU. 389. 
 
 U. S.; control over the navigable 
 rivers ; obstructions to navigation. 
 a 
 
 ATWEH,!,, BRO'WN v. See Brown u, Atwell. 
 AUGUISOIiA, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Auguisola. • 
 
 AUGUSTA, HOME INS. CO. v. See Home Ins. Co. v. Augusta. 
 AUGUSTA INS. CO., HUGG v. See Hugg v. Augusta Ins. Co. 
 AUIiD, HEPBURN v. See Hepburn v. Auld. 
 AUBOBA, THE, 1 TVh. 107. 
 
 Bottomry bonds, a 
 
 Admiralty; jurisdiction in suits 
 between foreigners. 6 
 
 Master; power to bind ship in 
 foreign port, c 
 
 U. S. 409, Boom Co. v. Pat- 
 terson. 
 
 a 18 H. 65, Carringlon v. Pratt. 
 a 9 Wall. 138, The Grapeshot. 
 6 9 Wall. 457, The Maggie Ham- 
 mond, 
 c 10 Wall. 200, The Lulu., 
 c 96 U. S. 648, Ins. Co. v. Gosszler. 
 
 AURORA, THE, v. UNITED STATES, 7 Cr. 388. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; maritime 
 causes, a 
 
 a 5 H. 459, Waring v. Clarke, 
 a 6 H. 378, New Jersey S. Nav. Co. 
 u. Mer. Bank. 
 
 AURORA CITY V. WEST, 7 Wall. 105 
 
 Judgments; when they can be 
 pleaded in bar. a 
 
 Pleading; demurrers; effect of 
 pleading to merits. 6 
 
 Conditions in acts authorizing 
 municipal aid to railroads; recitals 
 in bonds; estoppel, c. 
 
 Judgment against party first mak- 
 ing mistake in pleading, d 
 
 Coupons, e 
 
 Interest, f 
 
 a 7 Wall. 622, Beloit v. Morgan. 
 6 8 Wall. 287, Hudson Canal Co. 
 
 u. Penii Coal Co. 
 6 8 Wall. 357, Young v. Martin, 
 c 9 Wall. 414, Mayor v. Lord. 
 b 9 Wall. 762, Walking v. U. S. 
 b 10 Wall. 422, Campbell v. Wil- 
 
 .son. 
 d 12 Wall. 84, Bailroad Co. v. 
 
 Harris. 
 a 20 Wall. 143, Tioga R. R. v. 
 
 Blossburg & C. 
 
 R R 
 e 20 Wall. 589, Clark u.'lowa City. 
 a 91 U. S. 533, Gould o.EvansviUe 
 
 R. R. 
 5 93 U. S. 553, Stanton u.Embrey. 
 / 94 U. S. 441, Nat. Bankt). Mech. 
 
 Nat. Bank. 
 / 96 U. S. 62, Cromwell v. Sac 
 
 Co. 
 AURORA CITY, WEST v. See West v. Aurora City. 
 AVENDANDO v. GAY, 8 Wall. 376. 
 
 U. S. courts; waiver of jury; 
 statement of facts; how made out. 
 
 u 
 
 Supreme Court ; power of court 
 below to amend judgment after 
 writ of error. 6 
 
 a 13 Wall. 2, Bethell «. Mathews. 
 6 21 AVall. 552, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 11 
 
 AVEBY, LEGGETT -r. See Leggett v. Avery. 
 ATTLING, WEYAUWEGA v. See Weyauwega v. AyUng, 
 AYKES V. CABVEK, 17 H. 598. 
 
 Cross bills, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; where manda- 
 mus is the pr6per remedy, writ of 
 error will not lie. b 
 
 a 9 Wall. 809, Knbber Co. v. 
 Goocl}'ear. 
 
 b 16 Wall. 271, Ins. Co. v. Cora- 
 stock. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 38.5, The Dove. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 22.5, R. R. Co., ex parte. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 187, Ayres v. Chicago. 
 
 ,a 101 U. S. 640, Railway Co. v. U. S., 
 
 a 2 Wall. 432, Tobeyi). Leonards. 
 b 15 Wall. 110, Morgan v. Shinn. 
 
 AYKES V. CHICAGO, 101 V. S. 184 
 
 Cross-bill, a 
 AYKES, TJ. S. v. See U. S. o. Ayres. 
 BABBITT, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Babbitt. 
 BABBITT, WAXBKUN v. See Walbrati v. Babbitt, 
 BABIN, HIPP V. See Hipp v. Babin. 
 BABCOCK V. WYMAN, 19 H. 389. 
 
 Evidence ; interested witness ; 
 sale of interest, a 
 
 Mortgage; parol evidence to 
 prove, b 
 
 BACHEUJEK, MTNIfESOTA v. See Minnesota v. Baohelder. 
 BACON V. HAKT, 1 Bl. 38. 
 
 Supreme Court; citation, a I a o Wall. 824, Alviso v. U. S. 
 
 I a 12 Wall. 147, Bigler v. Waller. 
 BACON, OTIS V. See Otis v. Bacon. 
 
 BACON V. ROBERTSON, 18 H. 480. 
 
 Corporations; dissolution ; rights I a 6 Wall. 279, Lnm v. Robertson 
 of stockholders, a I 
 
 BADGER V. BADGER, 2 "Wall. 95. 
 
 Equity ; stale claims, a a 
 
 Within what time contract must 6 
 bo rescinded. 6 
 
 Concealed fraud ; limitations, c 
 
 c 
 
 BAGNELl V. BRODERICK, 13 P. 450, 
 
 Missouri land titles ; New Madrid 
 certificates ; notice of location ; sur- 
 veys, a 
 
 Patent; once issued, another can- 
 not issue on same certificate, b 
 
 Effect of patent as evidence that 
 all previous steps were regulai'ly 
 taken, c 
 
 Legal' title in government until 
 vested by patent in its grantee, d 
 
 Deeds ; presumptions as to val- 
 idity, e 
 
 21 AVall. 185, Marsliu.Wliitinore. 
 91 U. S. 592, Twill Lick Oil Co. 
 
 V. Marbury. 
 96 U. S. 618, Haywood v. Kat'l 
 
 Bank. 
 99 U. S. 202, Godden v. Kim- 
 
 niell. 
 101 U. S. 140, Wood!). Carpenter. 
 
 H. 51 , Barry v. Gamble. 
 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 H. 72, Lessieur v. Price. 
 H. 87, Miiiter v. Crommelin. 
 H. 488, Fen II v. Holme. 
 H. 495, Lea v. Copper Co. 
 H. 159, Hale v. Gaines. 
 H. 459, Fneiites v. U. S. ' 
 H. 248, Hooper v. Scheimer. 
 Wall. 149, Rector v. Ashley. 
 Wall. 197, Fi-isbie «. Whitney. 
 Wall. 458, Mcader v. Norton. 
 Wall. 102, Gibson r. Chouteau 
 Wall, lis. Best v. Polk. 
 U. S. 425, Clements u.Mache- 
 bouef. 
 a 92 U. S. 713, Hot Springs Cases. 
 
 d 9 
 d 11 
 d 13 
 c IS 
 e 92 
 
12 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BAGS OF COFFEE, 1960, V. S, 
 BAGS OF LINSEED, 1 Bl. lift. 
 
 Shipping; lien of sliip-owiier for 
 freight, a 
 Admiralty jurisdiction. 6 
 
 BAIGOBRY, THE, 8 ■Wall. 4T4. 
 
 The civil war; blockade of Lon- I 
 isiiina coast ; uiien terminated, a 
 
 BAIXEY V. DOZIEB, 6 H. 93. 
 
 Nogotiable ptiper ; statute of Mis- 
 sissippi as to inland bills of ex- 
 change; protest, a 
 
 Pleas in abatement, b 
 
 When waived, c 
 
 BAIXEY V. GrOVBB, »! Wall. 346. 
 
 Banlirnptey ; policy of the act; 
 speedy distribntion of the assets, a 
 Limitations. 6 
 
 See U. S. D. 1960 Bags of Coffee. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 492, Tlie Kddy. 
 a 5 Wall. 554, The Bird of Para- 
 dise. 
 6 7 Wall. 636, The Belfast. 
 a 14 Wall. 596, The Delaware. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 92, Tlie Josephine. 
 
 a 8 H. 235, Wanzer v. Tupper. 
 6 20 H. 265, Spenser v. liapsley. 
 3 Wall. 423, De Sobry v. Nichol- 
 son. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 642, Wood v. Bailey. 
 a 93 U. S. 351, Wiswall v. Camp- 
 bell. 
 6 98 U. S. 252, Gifford v. Helms. 
 
 BAILEY, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Bailey. . 
 BAILEY V. MAGUIBE, SS WaU. 226. 
 
 Constitution ; contract; exemp- i a 92 U. S. 675, Central Railroad v. 
 tions from taxation, a \ Geoi'gia. 
 
 BAILEY, POLLABD V. See:PoUard v. Bailey. 
 BAILEY, V. S. V. See U. S. i;. Bailey. 
 BAILIFF V. TIPPING, 2 Cr. 406. 
 
 Citation, a | a 6 H. 88, Villabolos v. U. S. 
 
 BAKEK, CABLE v.. See Cadle v. Baker. 
 BAKER v. GEE, 1 Wall. 333. 
 
 Gi'ants by Congress to States for 
 railroads; wlio can set up the non- 
 completion of the road, a 
 
 BAEEB V. MORTON, 18 Wall. 158. 
 
 Duress, a . 
 
 a 22 Wall. 571, Tuclcer v. Ferguson. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 432, U. S. v. Hnckabee. 
 a 17 Wall. 74, Mason v. U. S. 
 
 BAKER, MURRAY v. See Mnrray v. Ba-ker. 
 BACKER, WILLIAMS v. See Williams v. Baker. 
 BALDWIN V. BANK OF NEWBURY, 1 "Wall. 240. 
 
 Insolvent laws ; have no extra- 
 territorial operation, a 
 
 Parol evidence to show to whom 
 a loan was made. 6 
 
 BALDWIN V. ELY, 9 H. 580. 
 
 Payments; tender, a 
 
 BALDWIN V. HALE, 1 Wall. 223. 
 
 Insolvent laws; have no extra- 
 territorial operation, a 
 
 a 4 Wall. 410, Gilman v. Lockr 
 
 wood. 
 6 17 Wall. 25, Bank v. Kennedy. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 325, Talty «. Freedman's 
 Bank. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 410, Gilman v. Lock- 
 wood. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 326, State Tax Foreign- 
 Held Bonds. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 13 
 
 BAIDWEN V. PAYNE, 6 H. 338. 
 
 Constitution ; impairing oblisa- I a 12 H. 166, Gianrl GiiU R. R. and 
 tion of charter, a \ BankCo.i). Marshall. 
 
 BAIDWEN, STBASEK v. See Strader v. Baldwin. 
 BAI.es, WKIGHT v. See Wright v. Bales. 
 BAXI. V. LAJS^GLES, 103 U. S. 188. 
 
 Patent law ; reissues, a | a 102 U. S. 232, Garneauu. Dozier. 
 
 BAXLANCE v. FOKSTTH, 13 H. 18. 
 
 Ulinoislancl titles ; Peoria lots, a i a 24 H. 184, Ballanee v. Forsyth. 
 
 I a 1 Bl. 152, Gregg v. Tesson. 
 BAXIiAKD, MEAD v. See Mead v. Ballard. 
 BAXLABD V. THOMAS, 19 H. 388. 
 
 Duties; "invoice value;" pay- I a 96 U. S. 146, Artliur u. Goddard. 
 ment. a \ 
 
 BAltOU, GASSIES v. See Gassies v. BaUou. 
 BAIXiOU, HLRIART T. See Hiriart v. Ballou. 
 BAXTEVIOKE, THE, 8 WaU. 388. 
 
 Collision; Supreme Court will 
 afSrm where District and Circuit 
 Courts have concurred, unless de- 
 cree plainly wrong, a 
 
 Damages in collision cases. 6 
 
 Counsel fees, c 
 
 Total loss, d 
 
 a 11 Wall. 169, The Sapphire. 
 6 14 Wall. 278, The Cavuga. 
 c 15 Wall. 230, Oelrichs v. Spain, 
 c 15 Wall. 453, Flanders v. Tweed. 
 t« 19 Wall. 78, The Falcon. 
 a 21 Wall. 9, The Lady Pike. 
 6 93 U. S. 308, The Atlas. 
 a 97 U. S. 828, The City of Hart- 
 ford. 
 
 BAITIMOKE, BAHNET v. See Barney v. Baltimore. 
 
 B AXTIMOKE, BAKKON v. Ses Barron v. B.altimore. 
 
 BAXTIMOBE, GUT v. See Gruy v. B.^ltimore. 
 
 BAITIMOBE INS. CO., AlEXANBEK v. See Alexander v. Baltimore Ins. Co. 
 
 BAXTIMOBE INS. CO., CAZE & MCHAUD v. See Gaze & Eichaud ■d. Balti- 
 more Ins. Co. 
 
 BAXT. INS. CO., DICKEY v. Dickey v. Bait. Ins. Co. 
 
 BAIT. & OHIO K. B. CO., MARYLAND v. See Maryland v. Bait. & Ohio 
 E. E. Co. 
 
 BAXT. & OHIO B. B. CO., MABSHAXX v. See Marshall v. Bait. & Ohio 
 E. E. Co. 
 
 BAXTEVIOBE S. PACKET CO., HANEY v. See Haney v. Baltimore S. Packet 
 Co. 
 
 BAXTIMOBE & S. B. CO. v. NESBIT., 10 H. 395. 
 
 Retrospective and curative laws. I a 1 Wall. 204, Gelpckeu. Dubuque. 
 a i a 8 Wall. 603, Drehraan v. Stifle. 
 
 BAXT. & SUSQ. B. E. CO., STIMFSON v. See Stimpson u. Bait. & Susq. E. E. 
 
 Co. 
 BANK v. KENNEDY, 17 WaU. 19. 
 
 Supreme Court; assignment of 
 error; wlien objections must first 
 be taken in the court below, a 
 
 BANK V. XANIEB, 11 'Wall. 369. 
 
 National banks; lieu on stock of | as 18 Wall. 594, Bullard v. Bank, 
 their debtors, a I 
 
 BANK, POMEKOY v. See Pomeroy u. Bank. 
 BANK V. SUPEBVISOBS, 7 Wall. 88. 
 
 Constitution ; tax by State on I a 9 Wall. 589, Thompson v. Pacific 
 agency of national government. a\ R. R. 
 
 BANK OE AXABAMA, BOYD v. See Boyd i). Bank oi Alabama. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 418, Mays v. Fritton. 
 
14 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BANK OF AIAJBAMA v. DAITON, 9 H. BS9. 
 
 Statutes of limitations; excep- 1 a 6 Wall. 542, Hanger v. Abbott, 
 tions. a \ 
 
 BANK QF ALABAMLA, DAKRENGTON V. See Darrington v. Bank of Alabama. 
 BAI9K OF ALEXANDRIA v. DYER, 14 P. 144. 
 
 a 2 H. 401, Rhodes u. Bfill. 
 6 97 U. S. 637, Davie v. Briggs. 
 
 District of Columbia; laws gov- 
 erning, a 
 
 Statute of limitations; "'beyond 
 seas." b 
 
 BANK OF ALEXANDRIA T. HERBERT, 8 Cr. 36. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; assignee trustee for I a 96 U. S. 489, Casey v. Cavaroc. 
 creditors, a | 
 
 BANK OF ALEXANDRIA, PAGE V. See Page v. Bank of Alexandria. 
 
 BANK OF ALEXANDRIA v. SWANN, 9 P. 45. • 
 
 Negotiable paper; notice, a | a 10 P. 581, Dickens v. Beale. 
 BANK OF ALEXANDRIA, YEATON t. See Xeaton v. Bank of Alexandria, 
 BANK OF ALEXANDRIA, YOUNG y. See Young v. Bank of Alexandria. 
 BANK OF AUGUSTA T. EARLE, 13 P. 584. 
 
 Corporations; rights and pow- 
 ers, a 
 Riglits in other States. & 
 Power of State to tax bijinks. c 
 Comity, d 
 Franchises ; how held, e 
 
 a 14 P. 122, Kunsi-an v. Coster. 
 6 4 H. 17, Tombigbee R. K. Co. 
 
 V. Kneeland. 
 a 6 H. 318, Planters' Banli v. 
 
 Sharp, 
 c 8 H. 79, Nathan v. Louisiana, 
 a 9 H. 177, Perrine v. Chesapeake 
 
 & 0. i). Canal 
 
 Co. 
 d 9 H. 413, Townsend v. Jemison. 
 6 15 S. 4P0, McDonough v. Mur- 
 
 dock. 
 b 16 H. 325, Marshall v. Bait. & 
 
 Oliio B. B. Co. 
 b 18 H. 405, Lafayette Ins. Co. v. 
 
 French. 
 6 20 H. 231, Covington D ra w- 
 
 bridge Co. v. 
 
 Sheperd. 
 a 21 H. 442, Pearce v. Mad. & Iiid. 
 
 R. R. Co. 
 b 1 Bl. 295, Ohio & Miss. R. R. v. 
 
 Wheeler. 
 6 8 Wall. 179, Paul v. Virginia. 
 e 10 Wall. 51, People's Railr'd v. 
 
 Memphis R. R. 
 6 10 Wall. 415, Ducat v. Chicago. 
 a 10 Wall. 651, Merchants' Bank u. 
 
 State Bank. 
 b 11 Wall. 429, St. Louis v. Ferry 
 
 Co. 
 6 12 Wall. 81, Railroad Co. v. 
 
 Harris. 
 6 20 Wall. 456, Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 6 94 U. S. 540, Doyle v. Continen- 
 tal Ins. Co. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BANK OF BETHEL v. PAHQUIOQUE BANK, 14 Wall. 3S3. 
 
 National banks; receivers; powerl o 17 Wall. 21, Bank u. Ken nedj'. 
 to sue. a 1 
 
 BANK OF CINCINNATI, ESPY v. See Espy u. Bank ol Cincinnati. 
 
 BANK OF COLUMBIA, FRENCH v. See French v. Bank of Columbia. 
 
 BANK OF COLUMBIA v. LAWRENCE, 1 P. 678. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice by 
 mail; due tliligence. a 
 
 Legality of protest and notice, a 
 question of law for tlie conrt. & 
 
 ». 
 
 a 2 P. 543, Bank of tlie U. S 
 Carneal. 
 
 0! 9 P. 33, Bank of Alexandria v. 
 Swann. 
 
 a 10 P. 578, Dickens v. Beall. 
 
 a 2 H. 478, Bliett v. Poe. 
 
 a 4 H. 21G, Carpenter v. Wash- 
 ington Ins. Co. 
 
 6 18 H. 517, Watson v. Tarpley. 
 
 BANK OF COLUMBIA, MECH. BANK t. See Mech. Bank i). Bank of Col. 
 BANK OF COLUMBIA v. OAKLEY, 4 TVU. 835. 
 
 Contracts ; customs ; negotiable 
 paper; notice, a 
 
 U. S. courts; waiver of jury. 6 
 
 Laws of tlie States restricting 
 their jurisdiction under the Consti- 
 tution, void, c 
 
 Constitution ; due process of law. 
 d 
 
 Obligation of contracts ; power 
 of Congress over corporations, e 
 
 BANK OF COLUMBIA V. PATTERSON, 7 Cr. !899. 
 
 a 12 Wh. 254, Ogden v. Saunders. 
 a 4 H. 844, Harris v. Bobinson. 
 6 12 Wall. 281, Kearney v. Case, 
 c 20 Wall. 457, Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 dQ2 U. S. .554, U. S. u. Cruikshank. 
 e 98 U. S. 605, U. S. v. Union Pac. 
 E. R. Co. 
 
 Corporations ; by what law gov- 
 erned, a 
 Contracts of ; seal, b 
 Pleading ; general counts, c 
 
 S. 
 
 a 8 Wh. 347, Fleckner v. U 
 
 Bank. 
 6 9 Wh. 816, Osborn v. Bank of 
 
 the U. S. 
 6 12 Wh. 64, Bank of the U. S. v. 
 
 Danridge. 
 c 9 P. 562, Chesapeake and Ohio 
 
 Canal v. Knapp. 
 6 6 H. 318, Planters' B'k v. Sharp. 
 
 BANK OF COLUMBIA, RENNEB v. See Renner v. Banj£ of Columbia. 
 BANK OF COMMERCE v. NEW YORK, a Bl. 6aO.' 
 
 Taxation by State of capital 
 stock of banks ; exemption of U. 
 S. bonds, a 
 
 Constitutionality of State tax 
 not determined by its form, but by 
 subject on wliich burden is laid. 6 
 
 a 2 Wall. 210, Bank Tax Cases. 
 a 6 Wall. 48, Crandell U.Nevada. 
 a 6 Wall. 629, Provident Inst. v. 
 
 Massacliusetts. 
 a 7 Wall. 24, The Banks v. The 
 
 Mayor. 
 a 13 Wall. 35, Low v. Austin. 
 6 15 Wall. 272, State Freight Tax 
 
 Case. 
 6 97 Wall. 572, Cook v. Penn, 
 
 BANK OF GEORGIA, BANK OF U. S. v. 
 
 gia. 
 BANK OF GEORGIA, BBEITHAUPT v. 
 
 See Bank of U. S. v. Bank of Geor- 
 See Breithaupt v. Bank of Georgia. 
 
16 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BANK OF HAMELTON V. DUDLEY, 8 P. 498. 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatory eB'ect of 
 Stale decisions, a 
 
 a 6 Wall. 630, Proviflent Inst, v- 
 Massachusetts. 
 
 a 6 "Wall. 641, Hamilton Co. v. 
 Massachusetts. 
 
 BANK OF GEORGIA v. HIGGINBOTTAM, 9 P. 60. 
 
 MortgaKcsaiKl sales; difference, a | a 11 H. 392, Fowler v. Merrill. 
 BANK OF INDIANA, POMEROY v. See Pdmeroy v. Bank of Indiana. 
 BANK OF KENTUCKY, BRISCOE T. See Briscoe v. Bank of Kentucky. 
 BANK OF KENTUCKY v. WISTER, 3 P. 333. 
 
 (J 3 P. 431. BankConim. u. Wister. 
 
 6 11 P. 324, Briscoe v.. Bank Com- 
 monwealth. 
 
 c 12 P. 491, Sibbald, exparte. 
 
 d la P. 127, Smith v. Clapp. 
 
 d! 5 H. 2S8, Phillips v. Preston. 
 
 d 6 P. 36, Bank U. S. o. Sims. 
 
 6 1.5 P. 303, Curran v. Arl^ansas. 
 
 a 21 P. 85, Rice v. Minn. & North 
 West'nR.E.Co. 
 
 d 21 P. 576, White v. Vermont & 
 Mass. K. R. Co. 
 
 e 5 Wall. 678, Thompson «. Riggs. 
 
 d 9 Wall. 391, Biishnell.w. Kennedy. 
 
 e 92 U. S. 370, Scammon v. Kim- 
 ball. 
 
 BANK OF METROPOIilS, BRENT v. See Brent v. Bank of Metropolis. 
 BANK OF THE METROPOLIS v. GUTTSCHAXCK, 14 P. 19. 
 
 Jndo;ments ; reforming clerical 
 errors, a 
 
 Government; status as a con- 
 •tractor. 6 
 
 Power of court over its judg- 
 ments, c 
 
 Jurisdiction U. S. courts; "as- 
 signees;" judiciary act, sec 11. d. 
 
 General deposits with banks ; 
 legal tender, e 
 
 a 91 U. S. 361, Morsell v. First Nat. 
 
 Bank. 
 6 91 U. S. 418, First Unitarian Soc. 
 
 V. Faulkner. 
 
 a 3 H. 78, Henderson v. Anderson. 
 
 a 4 H. 413, Smytli v. Strader. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 173, Sweeney v. Easter. 
 
 Mortgages ; interest of mortgagor. 
 a 
 
 Evidence ; proof of authority of 
 signer of an instrument. 6 
 
 BANK METROPOLIS V. JONES, 8 P, 
 
 Negotiable paper ; party to can- 
 not discredit by his own testimony. 
 a 
 
 BANK OF METROPOLIS, MOORE v. See Moore v. Bank of Metropolis. 
 BANK OF THE METROPOLIS V. NETY ENGLAND BANK, 1 H. 334. 
 
 Agency ; sub-agents, a 
 Banks ; owners of negotiable 
 paper mutually transmitted. 6 
 
 BANK METROPOLIS T. NEYP ENGLAND BANK, 6 H. 335. 
 
 Banks ; collections, a | a 96 U. S. 3-5, U. S. v. State Bank. 
 
 BANK OF METROPOLIS, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Bank of the Metropolis. 
 BANK MT. PLEASANT, SPRIGG v. See Sprigg v. Bank Mt. Pleasants 
 BANK OF NEWBURY, BALDWIN v. See Baldwin 11. Bank of Newbury. 
 BANK OF NORTH AMERICA, TURNER v. See Turner v. Bank of North 
 
 America. 
 BANK OF PITTSBURG v. NEAL, 33 H. 96. 
 
 a 3 H. 769, Wilson v. Spiith. 
 6 6 H. 225, Bank of Metropolis v. 
 New England Bank. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; rights of bona- 
 fide holders, a 
 
 Delivery in blank; power to fill 
 up. 6. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 121, Murray v. Lardner. 
 6 4 Wall. 437, Davidson v. Lanier- 
 a 9 Wall. 550, Michigan Bank v. 
 
 Eldred. 
 b 92 Wall. 331, Angle v. Mut. Life 
 
 Ins. Co. 
 a 94 U. S. 734, Collins v. Gilbert. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 17 
 
 BAUK OF THE KBPUBLIC V. SULI^ABD, 10 WaU. 158. 
 
 forged ill- I a 94 U. S. 344, t'irist Nat. Bank v. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; 
 dorsements. a 
 
 Whitman. 
 
 BANK OF TETTNESSEE v. HORN, 17 H. 1S7. 
 
 Conflict of jnristliction ; Probate 
 Courts, a 
 
 a 23 H. 107, Green v. Creigliton. 
 a 21 Wall. 2S2, Yonley v. Laven- 
 der. 
 
 BANK OF V. S. V. BANK OF GEORGIA, 10 Wh. 348. 
 
 Pas'mouts on forged paper; re- 1 a 12 Wall. 193, Hoffman w. Banlv of 
 covery back of amount paid, a | Milwaukee. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. BEVERLEY, 1 H. 147. 
 
 Ees adjudicata. a | a 22 H. 17, Parker v. Kane. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. CARNEAX, Z P. 543. 
 
 Negotiable paper; notice; due 
 diligence, a 
 Presentment and demand. 6 
 
 a 10 P. 372, Dickens v. Beall. 
 a 4 H. 344, Harris v. Robinson. 
 6 8 Wall. 649, Cliicopee Bank v. 
 Phil. Bank. 
 
 BANK OF U. S. V. CORCORAN, 8 P. 181. 
 
 Negotiable paper; notice; due I a 10 P. 573, Dickens ». Beall. 
 diligence, a I 
 
 BANK OF THE TJ. S. v. DANDBIDGE, 18 TTh. 64. 
 
 Corporations, powers of ; offi- 
 cers, a 
 Contracts not under seal". 6 
 Bonds; presumed acceptance, c 
 Liability of corporations for acts 
 of agents, d 
 
 Official bonds; laches not impu- 
 table to tlie U. S. e 
 
 Public agents; presumptions as 
 to autliority. f 
 
 BANK OF THE U. 1 
 
 Constitution; relation of the 
 States to the gen'l government, a 
 
 Contracts ; by what law govern- 
 ed. 6 
 
 Statute of limitations; rule of 
 decision for the U. S. courts, c 
 
 Mistakes in law. d 
 
 a IP. 62, Minor v. Mech. Bank. 
 6 7 P. 30. U. S. V. Fillebrown. 
 a 13 P. 584, Bank of Aug. v. Earle. 
 a 6 H. 318, Planters' Bankk o. 
 
 Sharp. 
 a 9 H. 177, Perrine v. Chesapeake 
 
 & D. Canal Co. 
 c 15 H. 1 53, Broome v. IT. S. 
 d 18 H. 480, Bacon v. Robertson. 
 a 5 Wall. 782, Super's v. Schenk. 
 a 16 Wall. 217, Davis v. Gray, 
 c 16 Wall. 364, McNitt v. Turner. 
 d 18 Wall. 663, Jones v. U. S. 
 e 19 Wall. 146, Carpenter v. Ban- 
 
 nels. 
 e 20 Wall. 250, Coruett». Williams 
 e 92 U. S. 425, Clements u.Mache- 
 
 bouef. 
 a 99 U. S. 447, Keeley v. Sanders. 
 /lOl U. S. 192, Steam Engine Co. 
 V. Hubbard. 
 
 DANIEI-, 18 P. 48. 
 
 a 12 P. 720, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 b 1 H. 180, Bell ». Bruen. 
 
 c 6 Wall. .537, Hanger v. Abbott. 
 
 d 91 U. S. 50, Upton v. Trebilcock. 
 
18 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. V. DEVBATJX, 
 
 Citizenship; suits in U. S. courts 
 
 by coi-porations. a 
 
 Nature of corporations. 6 
 
 Act of 1839 (5 St. 32T); service in 
 
 suits brouglit to enforce liens on 
 
 land, c 
 
 BAISK or THE U. S. v. DONAII.T, 
 
 Virginia ; statute of limitations. 
 a 
 
 Contracts ; by what law govern- 
 ed. 6 
 
 Kule as to limitations, c 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. DUNN, 6 P 
 
 Negotiable paper ; party to cannot 
 discredit by his own testimony, a 
 Parol evidence. 6 
 CashiersoJbanlis; authority of. c 
 Liability on negotiable paper, d 
 
 BANK OF THE V. 
 BANK OP THE C. 
 
 ETTING V. 
 , FINLBY V. 
 
 6 Cr. 61. 
 
 a 5 Cr. 57, Hope Ins. Co. v. Board- 
 man. , 
 a 8 Wh. 464. iSociety v: New Ha- 
 ven. 
 a 9 Wh. 804, Osborn v. Bank of 
 
 the U. S. 
 a 5 P. 479, Bank of the U. S. v. 
 
 Martin. 
 a 13 P. 384, Bank of Augusta v. 
 
 Earle. 
 a 2 H. 530, Louisville B. R. Go.b. 
 
 Letson. 
 a 16 H. 325, Marshall h. Biilt. and 
 
 Ohio B. E. Co. 
 6 18 H. 480, Bacon v. Robertson. 
 a 20 H. 231, Covington Drawbridge 
 
 Co. V. Sheperd. 
 a 1 Bl. 29o, Ohio and Miss. B..R. 
 
 0. Wheeler. 
 a 8 Wall. 179, Paul v. Virginia. 
 a 18 Wall. 575, Sewing Mach. Co. 
 
 Case. 
 a 93 U. S. 135, Claflin v. Houseman. 
 c 93 U. S. 205, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 
 8 P. 361. 
 
 a 10 P. 596, Brent v. Bank of Wash- 
 ington. 
 6 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 b 13 P. 378, Wilcox v. Hunt, 
 c 9 H. 413, Townsend v. Jemison. 
 
 . SI. 
 
 a 8 P. 12, Bank of Metropolis v. 
 
 Jones, 
 a 11 P. 88, U. S. V. Lefler. 
 a 12 P. 143, Scott v. Llovd. 
 dloF. 390, U. S. M.B'k Metropolis. 
 a 3 H. 78, Henderson v. Anderson. 
 a 4 H. 413, Smyth v. Strader. 
 a 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 6 20 H. 447, Brown v. Wiley, 
 c 21 H. 360, U. S. B. City Bank. 
 a 1 Wall. 173, Sweeney v. Easter. 
 6 94 U. S. 425, Davis v. Brown. 
 6 95 U. S. 481, Brown v. Spoflfbrd. 
 
 See Ettmg ii. Bank of the U. S. 
 See Finley v. Bank of the U. S. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S., FIBCKNEB v. See Fleckner v. Bank of tjie U. S. 
 BANK OF THE U. S., FUtLEBTON t. See Fnllerton i. Bank of the U. S. 
 BANK OF THE U. S. V. GREEN, 6 P. 88. 
 
 Certificates of division, a I a 7 H. 190, U. S. u. Chicago. 
 
 I a 3 Wall. 254, Daniels v. R. E. Co. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 19 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S, 
 
 Circuit Courts XJ. S. ; iiow far 
 they adopt State practice ; process 
 acts, a 
 
 Enforcing indgments, 6 
 
 HAXSTEAD, 10 WTi. 51. 
 
 a 6 P. 648, Boyle v. Zacharie. 
 
 a 9P. 331, Beersu. Haugliton. 
 a 13 P. 57, Eoss v. Duval, 
 a 2 H. 611, McCracK-eu v. Hay- 
 ward, 
 a 6 H. 318, Plant. Bank ti. Sharp. 
 a 2 B1.440, Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 6 6 Wall. 194, Riggs u. Johnson. 
 a 6 Wall. 490, U. S. v. Eckford. 
 
 BANK OP THE V. S. v. HATCH, 6 P. 858. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; bills, notice, a | a 22 Wall. 587, Boss «. Jones. 
 
 BANK OF THE IJ. S. T. lEE, 13 P. 107. ' 
 
 Settlement legally executed and 
 recorded bj' citizen of "Virginia in 
 tliat State good as against judg- 
 ment of subsequent creditor in the 
 District of Columbia, a 
 
 When settlements valid. 6 
 
 Estoppels in pais, c 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S., MTLLS v. Se( 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. MOSS, 6 H. 
 
 Judgments; power of court over 
 
 after term, a 
 U.S. courts; rules of decision. 6 
 Suits by assignees of choses in 
 
 action; sec. 11 of judiciary act. c 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S., OSBOBNE v. 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. OWENS, a 
 
 Usury, a 
 
 a 14 H. 260, DeLane v. Moore. 
 6 IS Wall. 147, Sykesw. Chadwick. 
 c 96 U. S. 720, Morgan v. Bailroad 
 Co. 
 
 Mills V. Bank of the U. S. 
 31. 
 
 a 6 H. 274, Sheppard v. Wilson. 
 6 13 H. 186, Coffee v. Planters' 
 
 Bank, 
 c 8 Wall. 396, Bradley v. Rhines. 
 a 22 Wall. 245, French v. Hay. 
 
 See Osborne v. Bunk of the U. S. 
 P. 627. 
 a 9 P. 378, Bank of the U. S. v. 
 
 Waggener. 
 a 18 Wall. 384, Tiffany u. Boatman 
 
 Inst. 
 a 97 U. S. 23. Hotel Co. v. Wade. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. PLANTERS' BANK, 9 Wh. 904. 
 
 What is a suit against a State, a 
 Government and States ; con- 
 tracts by. 6 
 
 U. S. courts ; citizenship ; suits 
 by assignees, c 
 
 o 2 P. 318, Bank of K'yu. Wister. 
 6 11 P. 259, Briscoe w. B'k Cora'th. 
 6 2 H. 550, Louisville B.E. Co. ■«. 
 
 Letson. 
 5 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas.' 
 e 9 Wall. 393, Bushnell v. Ken- 
 nedy. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. RITCHIE, 8 P. 143. 
 
 Wills ; payment of debts ; statutes 
 of Maryland ; sale of land of minors 
 and lunatics, a 
 
 Judgments agahist administrator; 
 to what degree they bind the heir. 6 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. 
 
 Negotiable paper; presentment 
 for payment at particular place, a 
 Dennurrers to evidence. 6 
 
 a 1 H. 147, Bank U. S. v. Bevely. 
 6 7 H. 227, McLaughlin v. Bank of 
 Potomac. 
 
 SMITH, 11 Wh. 172. 
 
 a 13 P. 143, Wallace u.McCoiMiell. 
 6 20 H. 436, Suydam a. Williamson. 
 h 22 Wall. 131, Pleasants v. Fant. 
 a 100 U. S. 715, Coxv. Nat. Bank. 
 
20 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPEEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. T. THE U. 8., 8 H. 711. 
 
 a 5 H. 394, Bank of U. S. v. U. S. 
 b 96 U. S. 36, U. S. u. State Bank. 
 
 X ep;otiable paper ; Maryland stat- 
 ute, 1785, as to set-off. a 
 
 V. S. ; liability as party to nego- 
 tiable paper, b 
 
 BATOC OF THE U. S., VOOBHEES v. See Voorhees v. Bank of the U. S. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. WAGGENEK, 9 P. 378. 
 
 Usnry. a | a 97 U. S. 23, Hotel Co. v. Wade. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S. v. 'VrEISIGEB, » P. 384. 
 
 a 4 P. 366, Bank of ^he U. S. v. 
 
 Tyler. 
 
 Discharge from imprisonment of 
 debtor under the act of January, 
 1800. (2 St,,' 4.) a 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S., WHITING T. See WhiUng v. Bank of the U. S. 
 
 BANK OF THE U. S., WILtlAMS V. See Williams II. Bank of the U. S. 
 
 BANK OF THE V. S., WINSHIP v. See -Winshipu. Bank of the U. S. 
 
 BANK OF WASHINGTON, BBENT v. See Brent v. Bank of Washington. 
 
 BAJfK OF WASH., McGKUDER v. See McGrader v. Bank of Washington. 
 
 BANK OF WASHINGTON v. TKIPLETT, 1 P. !S5. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; usages ; days 
 of grace, a 
 Jury; province of as to evidence. 6 
 
 a 14 P. 318, Fowler v. Brantly. 
 
 a 4 H. 324, Cookendorfer v. Pres- 
 ton. 
 
 6 1 Bl. 49, Weightman v. Wash- 
 ington. 
 
 BAJSfK OF WASHINGTON, WAXKBB v. See Walker v. Bank of Washington. 
 
 BANK OF T^^EST TENNESSEE v. CITIZENS' BANK, 14 WaU. 9. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court ; Federal question, a 
 
 a 14 Wall. 12, Palmer ». Marston. 
 a 19 Wall. 577, Stevenson v. Will- 
 iams. 
 
 BANK FOB SAVINGS v. COLLECTOR, 3 WaU. 514. 
 
 Banks ; deposits; what is capital 
 stock, a 
 Taxation of savings banks. & 
 
 BANK TAX CASE, a Wall. 806. 
 
 Constitution ; State tax on banks; 
 investments in U. S. securities, a 
 
 Constitutionality of State tax 
 determined by the subject on whicli 
 the burden is laid, ft 
 
 "Capital stock" and "shares." c 
 
 BAiatS, CARNBAI. v. See Carneal v. Banks. 
 BAIfKS, ELDRED v. See Eldred -o. Banks. 
 BANKS, KNAPP t. See Knapp v. Banks. 
 BANKS V. MAYOR, 7 Wall. 24. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 609, Society for Savings 
 
 V. Coite. 
 a 6 Wall. 627, Prov. Inst. v. Mass. 
 6 17 Wall. 119, Oulton v. Sav. B'k. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 629, Prov. Inst. t). Mass. 
 a 7 Wall. 24, The Banks v. The 
 
 Mayor. 
 6 15 Wall. 272, St. Fr'ght Tax Cas. 
 e 95 U. S. 687, Parrington v. Tenn. 
 6 97 U. S. 572, Cook v. Penn. 
 
 Constitution; tax by State on 
 agency of Federal Government, a 
 
 a 9 Wall. 589, Thompson v. Pacific 
 
 Railroad. 
 a 11 Wall. 208, Ins. Co. v. Treas'r. 
 
 BANNING, JENKINS V. See Jenkins 1). Banning. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 21 
 
 BAPTIST ASSOCIATION v. HART, 4 Wh. 27 
 
 Cliaritable uses ; Statute 43 Eliz. 
 
 BARBER V. BARBER, 21 H. 682. 
 
 Marriage aiitl divorce ; domioil. a 
 BARBER, tWITED STATES v. See United gtates v. Barber, 
 
 a 3 P. 99, Inglis v. Trus. of Sailor's 
 
 Snug Harbor. 
 OS 2 H. 183, Vidal v. Ginird. 
 a 9 H. 76, Wlieeler v. Smitli. 
 a 17 H. 3S2, Fontain v. Ravenel. 
 a 24 H. 501, Perin v. Carv. 
 a 101 U. S. 366, Kaiii v. Gibboiiy. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 124, Clieever v. "Wilson. 
 
 BARBOUR, HOIiI.IN<JS"WORTH 
 BARCIiAY T. -HOWrELI., 6 P. 498. 
 
 Dedication to public uses, a 
 Adverse possession ; presumption 
 
 of conveyance. 6 
 Deeds ; boundaries ; monuments.; 
 
 c 
 
 See HoUrngswortli v. Barbour. 
 
 , s. 
 
 a 10 P. 662, New Orleans v. U. 
 
 6 11 P. 41, Ewing v. Burnett. 
 
 & 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 
 o 9 H. 25, Irwin v. Dixion. 
 
 c 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile. 
 
 a 14 H. 271, Vinoennes v. Indiana. 
 
 c 23 Wall. 62, St. Claira. Lov's'ston. 
 BARINGS, INS. CO. T. See Ins. Co. v. Barings. 
 BARKER, LANCSSE v. See Lanusse v. Barker. 
 BARKER, TJ. S. v. See U. S. ii. Barlcer. 
 
 BABKSDALE, TTEATHEBHEAJD f. See Weatherhead v. Barlcsdale. 
 BARNABT, BBITTAN v. See Brittan v. Barnaby. 
 BARNARD v. ADAMS, 10 H. 270. 
 
 General average, a 
 
 BARNARD t. ASHLEY, 18 H. 43. 
 
 Land office ; wlien its jurisdiction 
 is not exclusive of that of the courts. 
 a 
 
 Commissioner ; autliority over the 
 registers and receivers. 6 
 
 BARNARD V. GIBSON, 7 H. 640. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 
 a 3 Wall. 370, McAnd.c.Thatch'r. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 229, Star of Hope. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 117, Fowler v. Katli- 
 
 bones. 
 a 92 U. S. 405, Hobson v. Lord. 
 
 a 20 H. 7, Garland v. Wynn. 
 
 a 22 H. 202, Lytle v. Arkansas. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 558, Lindsay u. Hawes. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 82, Johnson v. Tows- 
 ley. 
 
 6 19 Wall. 652, Warren v. Van 
 Brunt 
 
 a 2 Wall. 110, Humiston v. 
 thorp. 
 
 BARNARD, DILLON v. See Dillon v. Barnard. 
 BARNARD v. KELLOGG, 10 WaU. 383 
 
 Stain- 
 
 Customs and usages, a 
 
 BARNES, LEAVENWORTH CO 
 
 a 13 Wall. 365, Robinson v. U. S. 
 a 14 Wall. 603, The Delaware. 
 a 100 U. S. 692, National Bank v 
 
 Burkhardt. 
 See Leavenwortli Co. v. Barnes. 
 
 BARNES V. KAILBOADS, 17 WaU. 899 
 
 Internal revenue; income tax. a 
 Tax on dividends, and interest 
 paid, b 
 
 Ins. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 329, Stockdalo v. 
 Co. 
 
 b 22 Wall. 631, Bailey u.R. E. Co. 
 
 6 94 U. S. 620, Erkwine v. Mil- 
 waukee R.R. Co. 
 
 6 100 U. S. 658, Imp. Co. v. Hack. 
 
 b 101 U. S. 550, E. B. Co. v. U. S. 
 
22 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BARNES, SAMPLE v. See Sample v. Bames. 
 BARNES, WEST v. See West v. Barnes. 
 BARNES V. WLLLIAMS, H Wh. 416. 
 
 Vei'dict; defective findings. 
 
 Mistrials, b 
 
 Keversals by Supreme Court. 
 
 a a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 
 6 20 H. 441, Suydamu. Williamson. 
 6 23 Wall. 162, Stickney v. Welt. 
 6 91 U. S. 131, Bait. &"P. K. E. v. 
 Trustees. 
 
 BARNEY V. BALTIMORE, 6 TVall. 889. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 110, Durant v. Essex 
 
 Equity ; dismissal without preju- 
 dice, a 
 
 XJ. S. courts ; parties ; citizen- 
 ship. 6 
 
 Supreme Court; reversal for 
 want of jurisdiction, c 
 
 b 14 Wall. 
 
 Co. 
 94, Traders' Bank v. 
 Campbell. 
 17 Wall. 579, Horn a. Lockhart. 
 93 U. S. 205, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 h 97 U. S. 425, Kendig v. Dean. 
 c 97 U. S. 456, Keith v. Clark. 
 a 102 U. S. 563, Goodman v. Nib- 
 lack. 
 
 BARNEY, DeKRAETT v. See DeKrafft v. Barney. 
 BARNEY V. DOLPH, 97 U. S. 658. 
 
 Land laws ; execution and deliv- 
 ery of patent; when ministerial, a 
 Oregon land titles. 5 
 
 BARNEY, HAWKINS T. See Hawkins v. Barney. 
 BARNEY V. SCHMEIDER, 9 Wall. 348. 
 
 Verdicts ; when the court can I a 95 U. S. 238, Ins. Co. u. Rodel 
 direct a verdict, a I 
 
 BARNEY V. WATSON, 93 U. S. 449. 
 
 Kevenue ; suits against collectors 
 to recover back duties, a 
 
 BARNITZ V. CASEY, 7 Cr. 468. 
 
 Wills ; effect of change of law on 
 prior wills, a 
 
 BARNUM, WHSON T. See WUson v. 
 BARNWELL, CLARK v. See Clark i) 
 BARR V. GRATZ, 4 W^h. 230. 
 
 Refusal to continue a cause or 
 grant new trial discretionary, and 
 not assignable for error, a 
 
 Seizin; possession. 6 
 
 Joint tenancy; adverse posses- 
 sion, c 
 
 Deed 30 years old evidence, d 
 
 a 101 U. S. 261, Simmons v. Wag- 
 
 nei'. 
 6 101 U. S. 507, Hall v. Russell. 
 
 I a 101 U. S. 179, Wright v. Blackes- 
 I lie. 
 
 I a 16 H. 279, Carroll v. Carroll. 
 
 Bamum. 
 . Barnwell. 
 
 1 P. 165, Wright v. Hollings- 
 worth. 
 
 P. 343, Clarke v. Courtaey. 
 
 5 P. 430, Bradstreet v. Hunt- 
 ington. 
 
 11 P. 486, Peyton v. Stith. 
 
 6 P. 124, Sicard v. Davis. 
 6 P. 706, U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 9 P. 63, Coulson v. Watson. 
 
 10 P. 200. Boon v. Chiles. 
 
 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 
 3 H. 687, Clymer v. Dawkins. 
 
 4 H. 121, Browne v. Clarke. 
 
 5 H. 223, Jones v. Van Zant. 
 
 1 Wall. 598, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 3 Wall. 105, Sparrowu. Strong. 
 
 13 Wall. 604, Ins. Co. v. Barton. 
 a 100 U. S. 81, R. Co. w.Twombly. 
 
MAKUAL OF SUPREME COURT BECISIONS. 
 
 23 
 
 BAKK V. LAPSiEY, 1 WTl. 151. 
 
 Eqnitj- ; specific performance, a 
 
 BARR£DA v. SIXSHEE, Zl H. 161. 
 
 Contracts ; construction, a 
 Wlieii question for tlie jury, b 
 
 a 99 U. S. 200, Exp. Co. i».R. B. Co. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 699, Nash v. Towne. 
 6 17 Wall. 142, Goiklartl v. Foster. 
 6 101 U. S. 270, West v. Smith. 
 
 Constitution ; fifth amendment 
 limitation on power of Federal Gov- 
 ernment, a 
 
 Retrospective legislation. 6 
 
 BABREME, LITTIE v. See Little v. Barreme. 
 BAKKETT, JOUKDAN v. See Jourdan v. Barrett. 
 BAKBETT, 'WLLMAMSON v. See WUliamson v. Barrett. 
 BABRON V. BALTIMORE, 7 P. 843. 
 
 a 14 P. 586, Holmes v. Jennison. 
 
 a 5 H. 432, Fox v. Ohio. 
 
 6 10 H. 532, East Hartford v. Hart- 
 ford Bridge Co. 
 
 a 20 H. 87, Withers v. Buckley. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 480, Pervear v. Com- 
 monwealth. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 324, Twitchell v. Com- 
 monwealth. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 278, Justices v. Murray. 
 
 o 21 Wall. 557, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 552, U. S. v. Cruikshank. 
 
 BARRON, BAILROAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Barron. 
 BAKROW, SHIELDS v. See Shields v. Barrow. 
 BARROWS T. KINDRED, 4 WaU. 399. 
 
 Ejectment ; 
 judgment, n 
 
 couclnsiveness of 
 
 a 9 Wall. 599, Merryman v. 
 
 Bourne. 
 a 13 Wall. 715, Watson v. Jones. 
 a 94 IT. S. 775, Hogan v. Ross. 
 
 BARRT, EX PARTE, 9 H. 65. 
 
 Supreme Ct.; habeas corpus 
 
 BARRY V. COOMBE, 1 P. 640. 
 
 Contracts ; statute of frauds, a 
 
 BARRY v. FOYLES.'l P. 311. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; waiver by appear- 
 ance, a. 
 Pleas iu abatement. 6. 
 
 BARRY v. GAMBLE, 3 H. 5S. 
 
 Missouri land titles; act 1824; 
 when claim barred, a 
 
 Spanish concession ; New Madrid 
 certificates, b 
 
 When land deemed appropriated, 
 c 
 
 BARRY, GUNN v. See Gunn v. Barry. 
 BARRY v. MERCEIN, 5 H. 103. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter 
 in dispute means a money value, a 
 Appellate jurisdiction. 6. 
 
 a ( a 93 U. S. 22, ex parte Parks, 
 a I a 95 U. S. 456, Williams u. Morris. 
 
 a 12 P. 300, Toland v. Sprague. 
 6 13 P. 307, Moore v. Bank of Me- 
 tropolis. 
 
 a 4 H. 456. Les Bois v. Brarael. 
 6 8 H. 301, Mills v. Stoddard. 
 6 12 H. 72, Lessienr v. Price, 
 c 6 Wall. 1.50, Rector v. Ashley, 
 c 9 Wall. 197, Frisbie v. Whitney. 
 6 19 Wall. 633, Mackay v. Easton. 
 b 92 U. S. 712, Hot Springs Cases. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 714, DeKrafft v. Barney. 
 b 1 Wall. 251, ex parte Vallandig- 
 
 ham. 
 6 3 Wall. 2.54, Daniels «. R. R. Co. 
 a 92 U. S. 361, Pottsw.Chuinasero. 
 b 94 U. S. 259, U. S. v. Young. 
 
24 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BAKTEMEYEK v. IOWA, 18 Wall. 189. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 1 a 97 U. S. 33, Beei- Co. v. Massa- 
 ti-acts ; police power, a. \ chusetts. 
 
 BABTH V. CUSE, 18 Wall. 400. 
 
 Snpi-eme, Conrt; assignnaent of I a lOlU. 3.112, Meguirep. Corwine. 
 immatei-iiil errors, a | a 101 U. S. 397, Whitney ».Wyman. 
 
 BABTLETT T. KASTE, 16 H. 263. 
 
 Revenue; collection of duties; 
 acts 1S42, 1846 ; undervaluation, a 
 Appraisers. 6 
 
 a 18 H. 524, Stairs v. Peaslee. 
 6 24 H. 522, Belcher v. Linn. 
 6 10 Wall. 453, Kimball u. Collector. 
 
 BARTI/ETT, PRINCE v. See Prince v. BarUett. 
 BAKTON, FLOBINTINB v. See Florlntine v. Barton. 
 BARTON V. POBSYTH, S Wall. 198. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error un- 1 a 10 Wall, 
 der sec. 22 of judiciary act. a \ 
 
 BARTON, HANRICK v. See Hanrick v. Barton. 
 
 BARTON, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Barton. 
 
 BASEY V. GALI.AGHEB, 80 WaU. 680. 
 
 291, Slaughter-house 
 Cases. 
 
 U. S. courts ; equity and law must 
 be preserved distinct, a 
 Issues out of chancery. 6 
 Mining ; right of possession, c. 
 
 BASSETT T. U. S., 9 Wall. 38. 
 
 Judgments ; control of court over 
 during the terra, a 
 
 Findings of facts; review of by 
 Supreme Court; bills of exception. 
 6. 
 
 BASSETT, U. S. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 381, Van Korden v. 
 
 Morton. 
 6 101 U. S. 252, Watt v. Starke. 
 c 101 U. S. 276, Broderj). Water Co. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 167, ex parte Lange. 
 6 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. u.Folsom. 
 b 19 Wall. 72, Crews ». Brewer. 
 6 21 Wall. 100, Ins. Co. v. Sea. 
 6 98 Wall. 443, The Abbotsford. 
 a 101 Wall. 752, Goddard ». Ord- 
 way. 
 
 See U. S. 1!. Basaett. 
 BATES V. COE, 98 U. S. 31. 
 
 Patent law; "first inventor." a I a 101 U. S. 660, Imhanserw.Buerk. 
 Combinations ; novelty. 6 I 6 102 U. S. 104, Parks v. Bootli. 
 
 BATES V. ELIilNOIS CEN. R. R. CO., 1 Bl. 804. 
 
 Public lands; survey and sale of I a 7 Wall. 289, E. K. Co. v. Schur- 
 <^ I mur. 
 
 BATES CO., HABSHMAN T. See Harshman v. Biites Co. 
 BATESVLLI/E INST. v. KAtTEEMAN, 18 WaU. 155. 
 
 War; suspension of the statute 
 of limitations, a 
 
 Equitable raoi'tgage ; passes by 
 assignment of the debt. 6 
 
 BATH CO. V. AMY, 13 Wall. 847. 
 
 U. S. courts ; mandamus, a 
 
 a 22 Wall. 587, Eoss v. Jones. 
 b 93 U. S. 207, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 
 BATSON, HOWARD v. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 428, Graham «. Norton. 
 a 19 Wall. 660, Heine v. Levee. 
 
 Commissioners. 
 a 102 Wall. 196, Greene County v. 
 
 Daniel. 
 See Howard v. Batson. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 25 
 
 BATTIN V. TAGGEKT, 17 H. 80. 
 
 Patent law; patents shonld be 
 construed liberally, a 
 
 Commissioner; surrender of old 
 and issuing new patent. 6 
 
 BATTON, TJ. S. v. See U. S. v. Batton. 
 
 BATTY, McNIILTY v. See McNulty v. Batty. 
 
 fl! 9 "Wall. 795, Rubber Co. u. Good- 
 year. 
 6 11 Wall. 544, Seyniour». Osborne. 
 
 BAYAKD, SCHIMMELPENNICH v. 
 BAYARD T. liOMBAKD, 9 H. 630. 
 
 Supreme Court ; practice ; how 
 regulated, a 
 
 To what judgments writ of error 
 will lie. 6 
 
 U. S. courts ; process acts ; lien 
 of judgments, c 
 
 BAYXEY V. GIIEEISI.EAJP, 7 Wh. 46. 
 
 Equitable titles ; prior in time 
 prior in right, a 
 
 Bona-fide purchasers ; latent equi- 
 ties ; choses in action. 6 
 
 See Schimmelpennicli v. Bayard. 
 
 a 18 H. 61, Graham v. Bayne. 
 6 18 H. 109, Curtis v. Petitpain. 
 c 7 Wall. 217, Brown v. Pierce. 
 
 a 10 P. 210, Boon v. Chiles. 
 
 6 17 H. 612, Judson v. Corcoran. 
 
 BAYNE, GRAHAM v. See Graham v. Bayne. 
 BAYNE V. U. S., 93 V. S. 648. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 35, U. S. v. State Bank. 
 
 U.S.; recoverybackof money il- 
 legally received from a disbursing 
 officer, a 
 
 BEALE, DICKENS v. See Dickens i). Beale. 
 BEAIX, I/ENDENBEKGEB v. See Lindenberger «. Beall. 
 BEAXS V. HALE, 4 H. 51. 
 
 Statutes; repeal by implication; I a 97 U. S. 543, Welch v. Cook. 
 I'cpugnancy. a \ 
 
 BEAN V. BECKWITH, 18 TVaU. 514. 
 
 False imprisonment, a | a 98 U. S. 266, Beckwith v. Bean. 
 
 BEAKD V. FBDEBY, 3 WaU. 493. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; pow- 
 ers of tlie commissioners under the 
 act of 1852. (9 St. 634.) a 
 
 Conflrmations; to whose benefit 
 they inure. 6 
 
 Patents on imperfect claims, c 
 
 BEAKD, LeKOY v. See LeEoy «. Beard, 
 BEASTON V. FARMERS' BANK, 18 P. 108, 
 
 Attachments; jurisdiction, a 
 U. S. ; priority of. 6 
 
 a 11 Wall. 457, Header v. Norton. 
 6 13 Wall. 496, Carpentier v. Mont- 
 gomery. 
 c 17 Wall. 265, Heushaw v. Bissell. 
 
 BEATTY T. KURTZ, » P. 566. 
 
 Dedication, a 
 Burial ground. 6 
 Devises to pious uses before there 
 is a grantee, c 
 
 a 13 P. 143, Wallace v. McConnell. 
 a 13 P. 584, B'k of Aug'ta v. Earle. 
 b 92 U. S. 621, Lewis v. D. S. 
 
 a 6 P. 431, Cincinnati v. White. 
 6 17 H. 382, Fontain v. Ravenel. 
 c 95 TJ. S. 313, Quid v. Washington 
 Hospital. 
 
20 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPEEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BBATY V. KNOWI-EB, 4 P. 165. 
 
 Corporations; powers of; con- 
 struction of ciiartei's. a 
 
 Constitution ; ri^lit of citizens of 
 different States to sue in U. S. 
 courts. 6 
 
 BBAUBIEN V. BEAUBIEN, 83 H. 190. 
 
 Eqnit3'; relief for fraud; liow it I a 16 Wall.29. VoorheesB.Bonestell. 
 must be alleged, a I a 101 U. S. 140, Wood v. Cai-penter. 
 
 BEAUKEGARD v. NEW OBtEANS, 18 H. 497. 
 
 a 11 P. 420, Charles River Bridge 
 V. Warren Bridge, 
 fls 6 H. 318, Planters' B'k v. Sliarp. 
 6 18 H. 336, Dodge v. Woolsey. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 
 U. S. courts ; when they will fol- 
 low the decisions of State courts in- 
 volving title to lands, b 
 
 BEAVER V. TAYtOB, 1 WaU. 637. 
 
 Evidence ; res gestce. a 
 Instructions. 6 
 Exceptions, c 
 
 a 22 H. 11, Parker ®. Kane. 
 
 6 24 H. 434, Suydara v. Williamson. 
 
 b 102 U. S. 655, Barrett v. Holmes. 
 
 a 8 Wall, 
 6 20 Wall. 
 6 95 U. S, 
 
 c 98 U. S. 
 b 101 U. S. 
 
 BECKWITH, BEAN v. See Bean v. Beokwith. 
 BECKWITH V. TAtBOT, 96 V. S. 889. 
 
 Statute of frauds ; memoran- I a 99 D. S. 
 dum. a I 
 
 BEDFORD, PABSONS V. See Parsons v. Bedford. 
 BEEBE, HAM.BTT T. See Hallett v. Beebe. 
 BEEBE V. EUSSBLt, 19 H. 884. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 
 408, Ins. Co. V. Mosley. 
 
 162, Ins. Co. ». Baring. 
 
 , 301, Transpoi-tation L. 
 
 V. Hope. 
 284, Beckw^itli v. Bean. 
 149, Worthington v. 
 
 Mason. 
 
 112, Grafton v. Cum- 
 mings. 
 
 BEEB CO. V. MASSACHUSETTS, 97 
 
 Police power of the States, a 
 
 BEEBS V. HAUGHTON, 9 P. 389. . 
 
 Insolvent laws ; discliarge of debt- 
 or, a 
 
 Process in U. S. courts ; authority 
 to make rules regulating, b 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; remedy, c 
 
 U. S. courts; lien of judgments; 
 when laws of the State furnish a 
 rule of decision, d 
 
 State legislation cannot control 
 judgments of Federal courts, e 
 
 a 19 H. 288, Fi),rrelly v. Woodfolk. 
 a 2 Wall. 110, Humiston v. Stain- 
 thorp. 
 a 12 Wall. 98, French K.Shoemak'r. 
 
 V. S. 85. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 504, Patterson v. Ky. 
 a 97 U. S. 669, Fertilizing Co. v. 
 
 Hyde Pai'k. 
 a 101 U. S. 818, Stone v. Miss. 
 
 a 12 P. 234, Lyon v. Anchencloss. 
 b 13 P. 57, Ross V. Duval. 
 b 14 P. 301, U. S. V. Knight. 
 1 H. 304, Duncan v. Darst, 
 c 6 H. 318, Planters' B'k v. Sharp. 
 a 2 Bl. 436, Ward v. .Chamberlain, 
 c 4 Wall. 553, Van Hoffman v. 
 
 Quincy. 
 e 6 Wall. 195, Riggs v. Johns. Co. 
 6 6 Wall. 758, Smith v. Cockrill. 
 
 BEEBS, PEOPI.E'S INS. CO. v. See People's Ins. Co. .. Beers 
 BEGGS, COLLECTOB V. See Collector ,„. Beggs. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPKEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 27 
 
 BEEN V. HEATH, 6 H. 849. 
 
 Husbanil and wife ; suit by wife, a 1 
 Equity ; fraud. 6 
 
 BELCHER V. lilTfN, 84 H. 581. 
 
 Customs; entries; appraisers, a 
 
 BEIFAST, THE, t TVaU. 684. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; naviga- 
 ble rivers, a 
 
 Maritime liens. 6 
 
 Suits in personam ; attachments ; 
 juriscUction of State courts to en- 
 force liens, c 
 
 Marine contracts and torts. A 
 
 Remedies of shipper for loss, e 
 
 BELI. V. BKUETf, 1 H. 169. 
 
 Letters of guaranty, a 
 Contracts; by what law gov- 
 erned. 6 
 Error ; waiver, c 
 
 BELT., HOPKXRK v. See Hopkirk v 
 BELL V. MOKBISON, 1 P. 351. 
 
 Statutes of limitation ; construc- 
 tion, a 
 
 U. S. courts ; when they will fol- 
 low decisions of State tribunals, h 
 
 Limitations; new promise, c 
 
 Depositions, d 
 
 Partners ;• admissions after disso- 
 lution, e 
 
 a 21 H. 583, Barber v. Barber. 
 h 19 Wall. 263, Kitchen ■e. Tlay- 
 burn. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 453, Kimball v. Collect- 
 or. 
 a 23 Wall. 402, Donovan «. U. S. 
 
 25, The Eagle. 
 
 210, The Kalorama. 
 , 29, Ins. Co. V. Dun- 
 ham. 
 
 188, Leon v. Galveran, 
 
 242, ex parte McNoel. 
 
 384, Penny wit U.Eaton 
 
 531, Steamboat Co. v. 
 Chase. 
 
 218, The Lottowana. 
 
 556, Edwards v. El- 
 liott. 
 
 316, The Atlas. 
 
 366, Norton v. Svvitzer. 
 43, U. S. V. Ames. 
 
 119, Schoonmaker v. 
 Gil mo re. 
 
 a 2 H. 445, Lawrence ». McCal- 
 
 raont. 
 6 19 H. 392, Buckley «. Honald. 
 c 97 U. S. 583, Newcomb v. Wood. 
 
 Bell. 
 
 a 
 b 
 a 
 
 8 Wall 
 
 10 Wall 
 
 11 Wall 
 
 c 
 d 
 c 
 c 
 
 11 Wall 
 13 Wall 
 
 15 Wall 
 
 16 Wall 
 
 c 
 c 
 
 20 Wall 
 
 21 Wall 
 
 e 
 c 
 c 
 a 
 
 93 U. S. 
 
 93 U. S. 
 
 99 U. S. 
 
 102 U. S 
 
 a 3 P. 45, Willison v. Watldns. 
 
 6 a P. 128, Inglis r. Sailor's Snug 
 Harbor. 
 
 c 6 P. 91, Moore v. Bank of Co- 
 lumbia. 
 
 d 11 H. 392, Fowler v. Merrill. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 256, U. S. v. Wilder. 
 
 e 91 U. S. 169, Hall v. Lanning. 
 
 BEIX V. BAILBOAB CO., 4 Wall. 601 
 
 Municipal corporations; sub- 
 scriptions to railroads ; powers, a 
 
 Demurrers; pleading over ; waiv- 
 er, b 
 
 BELI/, BAXSTON v. See Balston v. Bell. 
 BELL, SMITH v. See Smith v. Bell. 
 BELOIT V. MOBGAN, 7 WaU. 619. 
 
 Municipal aid to railroads; con- 
 ditions in acts authorizing; recitals 
 in bonds ; estoppel ; bona-flde pur- 
 chasers, ft 
 
 Kes judicata, b 
 
 When judgment a bar. c 
 
 a 11 Wall. 105, New Albany v. 
 
 Bnrke. 
 6 93 U. S. 553, Stanton u.Embrey. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 414, Mayor u. Lord. 
 
 6 20 Wall. 142, Tioga E.R. v. Bloss- 
 
 burg & C. R. E. 
 c 91 U. S. 533, Gould v. Evansville 
 
 R. R. 
 
28 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 BEIOIT, MORGAN v. See Morgan v. Belolt. i 
 
 BENBOW V. IOWA CITY, 7 Wall. 313. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 398, U. S. v. New Orleansj 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; maudamus by IT. S. courts 
 to compel levy of a tax to pay judg- 
 ment, a 
 
 BEND V. HOYT, 13 P. 863. 
 
 Duties on silk stockings, a 
 Suits against collectors ; volun- 
 tary payment; recovery bank of 
 taxes, b 
 Statutes ; construction of. c 
 Removal of suits against collect- 
 ors, d 
 
 a 13 P. 293, Hai-dy v. Hoyt. 
 6 3 H. 239, Gary v. Curtis. 
 6 4 H. 331, Bankin v. Hoyt. 
 c 7 H. 790, Lawrence v. Allen. 
 d 5 Wall. 542, Ins. Co. «. BitchieJ 
 6 5 Wall. 732, Phila. w. Collector.* 
 6 7 Wall. 128, Nicholls u. U. S. ■ 
 6 12 Wall. 209, State Tonnage Tax 
 
 b 22 Wall. 639, Bailey v'. E. R. Co, 
 6 98 U. S. 544, E.B. Co.«. Com'rs. 
 
 BENEDICT, WILXIAMB v. See WiUiams v. Benedict. 
 BENHAM, TAYLOR v. See Taylor v. Benham. 
 BBNNER V. PORTER, 9 H. 836. 
 
 Ten-itoi'ial courts ; effect of admis- 
 sion as State on suits pending, a 
 
 Constitution and laws of the 
 Union in force as soon as admission 
 takes place, b 
 
 Judicial power of the U. S. c 
 
 BENNETT v. BUTTEBWORTH, 
 
 Supreme Court; value of matter 
 in dispute, u, 
 
 BENNETT v. BUTTERWORTH, 11 H. 674 
 
 U. S. courts ; equity and common a 18 
 
 law jurisdiction must be kept dis- 6 20 
 
 tinct ; State codes, a a 20 
 
 Supreme Court ; to i-everse, error a 21 
 
 must appear on the record. 6 a 23 
 
 When bill of exceptions unneces- a 1 
 sai-y. c 6 1 
 
 a 10 H. 77, Mclfulty v. Batty. 
 6 14 H. 235, Calkin v. Cocke, 
 c 17 H. 531, U. S. V. Eiitchie. 
 a 2 Wall. 173, Freeborn v. Smith. 
 a 12 Wall. 153, Baker v. Morton. 
 a 13 Wall. 447, Clinton v. Eiigle- 
 
 brecht. 
 a 98 U. S. 154, Reynolds v. U. S. 
 
 8 H. 184. 
 
 a 20 H. 463, Stinson v. Dousman. 
 
 c 3 
 
 a 6 
 
 c 10 
 
 6 16 
 6 91 
 
 a 99 
 
 H. 01, Graham v, Bayne. 
 
 H. 433, Suydamj). Williamson 
 
 H. 525, McFaul k. 'Ramsey. 
 
 H. 482, Fenn v. Holme. 
 
 H. 486, Green v. Custard. 
 
 B1.314. Faiiii v. Tesson. 
 
 Wall. 600, Poraeroyu.Bankof 
 Indiana. 
 
 Wall. 661, Rogers v. Burling-™ 
 ton. 
 
 Wall. 137, Thompson v. R. E. 
 Go's. 
 
 Wall. 261, New Orleans R. E. 
 V. Morgan. 
 
 Wall. 386, Ins. Co. v. Piaggio. 
 
 U. S. 130, Bait. & P. R. R. », 
 Trustees. 
 
 U. S. 380, Van Norden v. Mor- 
 ton. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 29 
 
 BBITNBTT v. 
 
 Tax sales. 
 
 HUNTER, 
 
 a 
 
 9 Wall. 386. 
 
 a 18 "Wall. 550, Tacey «. Irwin. 
 a 22 Wall. 274, Hampton v. Rouse. 
 a 99 U. S. 186, Atwood ». Weems. 
 
 BENNETT, OAKEY x. See Oakey u. Bennett. 
 BENTLEY T. COYNE, 4 Wall. 518. 
 
 Collision ; rules of navigation, a | a 9 Wall. 425, The Fairbanks. 
 
 BEKBIIIDA, THE, 3 WaU, 543. 
 
 Blockade ; violation of. a | a 5 Wall. 54, The Peterlioff. 
 
 BERNAX, LYNCH V. See Lrynch v. Bernal. 
 BERRY, CLEMENTS v. See Clements v. Berry. 
 BERRY, W^IXLIAMSON v. See WilUamson v. Berry. 
 BEST, WALLER v. See Waller v. Best. 
 BETHEL V. DEaiARET, 10 Wall. 637. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of ei-ror to 
 State courts ; Federal question ; gen- 
 eral questions of public law grow- 
 ina: out of the civil war. a 
 
 BETHEL V. MATHEWS, 13 Wall. 8. 
 
 Supreme Court: review of find- 1 
 ings of facts, a \ 
 
 BETSEY, THE, GLASS v. See Glass v 
 
 BETSEY AND CHARLOTTE, THE, 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction, a 
 Trial must be by court, b 
 (But see act of 1875, 18 St. 315.) 
 
 a 13 Wall. 433, WestTenn. Banku. 
 Citizens' Bank. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 10, Bankof West Temi. 
 V. Bank of La. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 577, Stevenson v. Will- 
 iams. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 130, Rockhold v. Rock- 
 hold. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 287, N. Y. Life Ins. Co. 
 V. Heudrew. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 589, U. S. v. Thompson. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 333, Bank u. McVeigh. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 2.52, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 
 V. The Betsey. 
 4 Cr. 443. 
 
 a 7 Cr. 112, Whelen«. U. S. 
 h 8 Wh. 391, The Sarah, 
 a 6 H. .378, N. J. Steam Nav. Co. 
 V. Merch. Bank. 
 a 7 Wall. 638, The Belfast. 
 6 8 Wall. 26, The Eagle. 
 h 99 D. S. 374, U. S. v. Winchester. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 350, U. S. v. Thomas. 
 6 16 Wall. 581, Malbrun v. Babbitt. 
 6 93 U. S. 147, Hendrick v. Lind- 
 say. 
 
 BEVANS V. V. S., 13 WaU. 66. 
 
 Public officers; bonds; liability 
 of sureties ; forcible taking of money 
 by the enemy, a 
 
 When the court can direct a ver- 
 dict, b 
 
 BEVANS, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Bevans. 
 BEVEL Y, PETER v. See Peter v. Bevely. 
 
 BEVERLEY, BANK OP THE U. S. v. See Biink of the U. S. 1). Beverley. 
 BEVERLEY, MARSHALL v. See Marshall v. Beverley. 
 BLAYS V. CHES. INS. CO., 7 Cr. 416. 
 
 Marine insurance; total loss; I a 1 Wh 224 Morcau «. Ins. Co. 
 abandonment, a | a 19 Wall. 643, Ins. Co. t-. Fogarty 
 
30 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BEDDtB, GBEEN V. See fireen v. Biddle. 
 BIGEIOIV T. FORBBST, 9 Wall. 339. 
 
 U. S. coints; removal of causes ; 
 act March 3, 1863. a 
 
 Void anil voidable judgments ; 
 jurisdiction. 6 
 
 Confiscation, c 
 
 a 10 Wall. 25, McKee v. Bains. 
 a 10 Wall. 224, Bniun v. Saui-wein. 
 6 18 Wall. 175, ex parte Lange. 
 c 18 Wall. 160, Day v. Micou. 
 c 20 Wall. 115, Confiscation Cases. 
 c 91 U. S. 27, Semmes v. U. S. 
 c 92 U. S. 211, Wallach». VanEis- 
 
 wick. 
 6 93 U. S. 283, Windsor©. McVeigh^ 
 
 See Seaver v. Bigelows. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 89, Kitchen v. Bandolph.i 
 
 BIGBtOWS, SEAVER T, 
 
 BIGLBB V. WAXiEB, 19 'Wall. 149. 
 
 Supersedeas, a | 
 
 BIGI.BR V. WAI.I.BR, 14 "WaU. 308. 
 
 Mortgage with power of sale-. a \ a 97 U. S. 77, Shillaber v. Robinson. 
 BIIXINGS, PEOVIDENCB BANK V. See ProTidenoe Bank v. Billings. 
 BINDtEY, EYAN T. See Byan v. Bindley. 
 BINGHAM V. CABOT, 3 Ball. 19. 
 
 Jurisdiction U.S. courts; citizen- a 4 Dall. 7, Turner w. Enville. 
 
 ship, a a 4 Dall. 22, Course v. Stead. 
 
 Suits by assignees; sec. 11 of ju- a 1 Cr. 343, Abercrombie«>. Dupuis- 
 
 diciary act. b a 2 Cr. 1, Wood u. Wagnon. 
 
 o 8 P. 112, Brown v. Keene. 
 
 6 6H. 36, Bank of U. S. J). Moss, 
 a 19 H. 402, Dred Scott w. Sandford 
 
 a 9 Wall. 565, Hornthall v. CoUec, 
 
 a 3 Wall. 103, Spari'ow v. Strong. 
 
 BINGHAM V. MORRIS, 7 Cr. 99. 
 
 Supreme Conrt; motion to docket; I 
 motion to dismiss underEule 9. a \ 
 
 BINGHAMTON BRIDGE, 3 Wall. 71. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of eon- a 13 Wall, 
 tracts; power of State legislatures a 16 Wall, 
 over charters of corporations, a a 95 U. S. 
 
 BINNS, KINGO V. See Ringo i;. Binns. 
 BIRD, GUNNELI, v. See Gunnell v. Bird. 
 BIRD OB PARADISE, THE, 5 Wall. 545. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 
 a 9 Wall. 
 
 Shipping; lien of shippers for safe 
 transportation, u, 
 
 a 14 Wall, 
 
 BIEDSAXL V. COOLIDGE, 93 U. S. 64. 
 
 Patent law ; profits, a | a 97 U. S. 
 
 BIRTH, GREENLEAF v. See Greenleaf v. Birth. 
 BISCHOEE V. WETHERBD, 9 W^all. 814. 
 
 Patent lavv ; technical terms ; I a 11 Wall, 
 scientific witnesses ; experts, a | a 13 Wall. 
 
 BISHOP, STOCKTON v. See Stockton v. Bishop. 
 
 BISSEtt, HENSHAW v. See HensUawu. Bissell. 
 
 214, Penn. College Cases 
 249, Humphrey v. Peques 
 689, ^ai-rington v. Tenn. 
 
 642, The Belfast. 
 450, The Maggie Ham- 
 mond. 
 596, The Delaware. 
 
 360, Marsh v. Seymour. 
 
 546, Seymour «. Osborne 
 456, Tucker v. Spalding. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 31 
 
 County bonds in aid of railroad ; 
 recitals ; bona-flde holders ; estop- 
 pels, a 
 
 Corporations; contracts; estop- 
 pel. 6 
 
 Katification by legislature, c 
 
 BlSSELt V. JEFFERSONVrLlE, 84 H. 888. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 725, Mwan v. Miami Co. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 667, Rogers v. Burl. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 277, Larned v. Bnrl. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 783, Siiperv. t-. Schencl^. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 413, R.R. Co. r. Howard 
 
 b 10 Wall. 645, Merchants' Bank v. 
 State Bank. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 305, Pendleton Co. v. 
 Amy. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 296, Lexington u. Butler 
 
 c 16 Wall. 663, St. Joseph Town- 
 ship V. Rogers. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 492, Coloma v. Eaves. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 500, Venice v. Murdock. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 96, Hackett v. Ottowa. 
 
 BISSEi:.r V. PBafROSB, 8 H. 317. 
 
 Missouri land titles ; concessions ; 
 reservation of land fi'om sale, a 
 
 Title by way of estoppel and in- 
 urement. 6 
 
 When confirmee takes a title on 
 which he can maintain ejectment, c 
 
 Sale of imperfect Spanish title ; 
 when legal title passes, d 
 
 Wlien legal title passes by act of 
 Congress, e 
 
 Surveys ; locating concessions, f 
 
 BLACK, LEDOtrX v. 
 
 BXACK, TOTING T. See Young v. Black. 
 
 BI,ACK v. ZACHABIE, 3 H. 495. 
 
 a 8 H. 301, Menard t>. Massey. 
 6 10 H. 369, Landes u. Brant, 
 c 18 H. 411, Stanford v. Taylor, 
 c 19 H. 334, Bryan v. Fofsyth. 
 6 21 H. 302, Morehouse v. Phelps. 
 d 24 H. 364, Massey v. Papin. 
 e 1 Bl. 189, Carondelet v. St. Louis, 
 c 8 Wall. 661, Maguirc v. Tyler. 
 c 17 Wall. 280, 'I'yler v. Maguire. 
 6 19 Wall. 146, Carpenter v. Ran- 
 
 nels. 
 6 22 Wall. 261, Cormoyeru. Schaef- 
 
 fer. 
 / 98 U. S. 212, Snyder v. Sickles. 
 See Ledoux v. Black. 
 
 Supersedeas, u, | a 21 Wall. 30, Jerome v. McCarter. 
 
 BI.ACKBtJBN V. CBA'WrOKD, 3 WaU. 175. 
 
 Judgment ; when an estoppel 
 Instructions. 6 
 
 a 13 Wall. 474, CaujoUc v. Ferrie. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 57, Kearney v. Denn. 
 
 6 20 Wall. 162, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 BLACKrOBD, W1L.SON v. See 'Wilsoii v. Blackford. 
 BliACKLEDGE, OGDBN v. See Ogden v. Blackledge. 
 
 BliACE BXVEB IKON CO., KOEHXEE v. See Koehler v. Black River Iron Co. 
 BliACKSaHTH, FELI-OWS v. See Fellows v. Blacksmith. 
 BtACKTVEIX, THE, 10 Wall. 18. 
 
 Admiralty; salvage ; lien for. a | a 101 U. S. 387, The Sabine. 
 
 BIAINE V. THE CHARLES CARTER, 4 Dall. 88. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appellate juris- 1 a 5 Wall. 579, Jones v. La Vallette. 
 diction by writ of error, a I 
 
 BLAINE V. THE CHARLES CARTER, 4 Cr. 388. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; judgments void and I a 10 P. 469, Voorliees v. Bank U. S. 
 voidable, a 1 
 
 BLAIR V. MILLER, 4 DaU. 81. 
 
 Supreme Court U. S.; return of I a 4 Cr. 181, Wood v. Lide^ 
 writ of error. ' a I 
 
 a 99 U. S. 506, Gi'igsby v. Purcell. 
 
32 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BLAIBEAU, SHIP, MASON v. See Mason v. Ship Blaireau. 
 
 BXiAEJE:, hughes v. See Hughes v. Blake. 
 
 BI.AKE, LOUGHBOROUGH V. See Loughborough v. Blake. 
 
 BI.AUC, COUSIN V. See Cousin v. Blanc. 
 
 BtAI^^C V. LAFAYETTE, 11 H. 104. 
 
 Louisiana land titles; incomplete I a 11 H. 124, Leoompte v. U. S. 
 grants, a \ 
 
 BLANCHARD v. BROWN, 3 WaU. 845. 
 
 Ejectment ; conclusiveness of | a 4 Wall. 176, Sturdy e. Jacliaway. 
 verdicts, a 
 
 I a94 U. S. 775, Hogau v. Kurtz. 
 
 BliANCHARD, GRAY v. See Gray v. Blanehard. 
 BLANCHABD v. PUTNAM, 8 Wall. 426. 
 
 Patent law ; infringement, a 
 
 Defense of "prior invention." 
 
 Bufden of proof, c 
 BLAND, McNUTT v. See McNutt v. Bland. 
 BLATCHFORD, COAl CO. v. See Coal Co. v. Blatchford 
 BLIGHT, FISHER v. See U. S. V. Fisher. 
 BLIGHT T. ROCHESTER, 7 Wh. 500. 
 
 a 11 Wall. .559, Seymour u. Osborne. 
 6 95 U. S. 215, Koeraer v. Simon, 
 c 98 U. S. 49, Bates v. Coe. 
 
 Obligatory force of decisions of 
 State courts on U. S. courts, a 
 
 Adverse possession ; estoppel to 
 deny title. 6 
 
 Bona-fide purcliasers. c 
 
 Vendor and vendee ; relation of 
 landlord and tenant does not exist 
 between, d 
 
 a 12 Wli. 164, Jackson v. Clievv. 
 
 6 3 P. 43, AVillison v. Watkins. 
 
 6 4 P. 480, Society, &c., v. Pawlet. 
 
 6 5 P. 430, Bradstreet v. Hunting- 
 ton. 
 
 6 6 P. 369, Hughes v. Clarksville. 
 
 b 10 P. 180, Boone v. Cliiles. 
 
 6 3 H. 687, Clvmer v. Dawkins. 
 
 6 4 H. 294, Zeller v. Eckert. 
 
 c 5 Wall. 287, Croxall b. Shererd. 
 
 d 9 Wall. 293, Burnett v. Cald- 
 well. 
 
 d 9 Wall. 600, Merry man o. 
 Bourne. 
 
 b 21 Wall. 488, Grossholtz v. New- 
 man. 
 
 BLIVEN V. NEW ENGLAND SCREW CO., 83 H. 431. 
 
 Customs, a 
 
 Court and jury ; construction of 
 writings, b 
 Direction to flud a verdict, c 
 
 BLOOMER V. McQueen, 14 h. 539. 
 
 Patent law ; extension of patent ; 
 rights of licensees, a 
 Vendees. 6 
 
 a 1 Wall. 471, Ins. Co. u. Wright. 
 a 5 Wall. 679, Tliompson v. 
 
 Kiggs. 
 6 17 Wall. 142, Goddard B.Foster, 
 c 18 Wall. 251, Ins.Co. v. Folsom. 
 a 23 Wall. 503, Moran v. Pratlier. 
 a 100 U. S. 692, National Bank v. 
 
 Burkhardt. 
 
 a 20 a. 202, Dean v. Mason. 
 
 a 22 H. 223, Chaffee v. Boston 
 
 Smelting Co. 
 a 1 Wall. 351, Bloomer v. Millen- 
 
 gar. 
 a 16 Wall. 547, Mitchell o. Hawley. 
 6 17 Wall. 456, Adams v. Burke. 
 a 18 Wall. 416, Eunson v. Dodge. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 33 
 
 BrOOMER T. MTLLENGER, 1 Wall. 350. 
 
 Patent ]a\v ;■ assignments ; sale; I a 16 Wall. 547, Mitchell u.Hawley. 
 nghts of vendee, a | a 18 Wall. 416, Eunsoii v. Dodge. 
 
 BLOOMSHIBE, EDMONSON v. See Edmonson «. Bloomshii-e. 
 BLOSSBUKG B. R., TIOGA B. B. v. See Tioga R. R. v. Blossburg R. R. 
 BtOSSOM V. MILAVAUKEE R. R. CO., 1 Wall. 635. 
 
 Purchasers and bidders at judi- 
 cial sales ; how far parties to the 
 suit, a 
 
 When they can appeal to Su- 
 preme Court. 6 
 
 Final decrees, c 
 
 a 2 Wall. 634, Minnesota Co. v. 
 
 St. Paul Co. 
 6 5 Wall. 662, K.R.Co. v. Soutter. 
 h 91 U. S. 248, ButterBeld v. V. S. 
 a 94 U. S. 468, Hinkley v. Gilman. 
 c 96 U, S. 714, Sage v. R. R. Co. 
 
 BLOSSOM V. BAIXBOAD, 3 W^all. 209. 
 
 Judicial sali's; adjournments, a | a 91 U. S. 26, Semmes v. U. Si 
 BI.OUGHEB, BREWER v. See Brewer v. Blougher. 
 BltJNT V. SMITH, 7 WTi. 848. 
 
 Error; refusal to grant new trial 
 not assignable, a 
 
 a 1 Wall. 598, Pomeroy v. Bank of 
 
 Indiana. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 502, Ewing v. Howard. 
 See Hope Ins. Co. v. Boardman. 
 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 6 20 H. 265, Spenser v. Lapsley. 
 
 BOARDMAN, HOPE INS. CO. v. 
 BOARDMAN v. READ, 6 P. 348. 
 
 Land titles; when patent neces- 
 sary to give legal title, a 
 Conclusive at law. 6 
 
 BOARD OF COMMISSIONEBS v. GORMAN, 19 Wall. 661. 
 
 Supersedeas, a I a 93 U. S. 89, Kitchen v. Raudolph. 
 
 I a 94 U. S. 52, Doyle v. Wisconsin. 
 
 BOARD OF W^ABDENS, COOI.ET v. See Cooley v. Board of Waidens. 
 
 BOATMAN'S INST., TIFFANY v. See Tiffany v. Boatman's Inst. 
 
 BODI.EY V. TAYLOR, 5 Cr. 881. 
 
 Land laws; conflict of titles; 
 junior and senior grants and en- 
 tries ; equities, a 
 
 Rule of decision in U. S. courts. 6 
 
 a 5 Cr. 241, Taylor v. Brown. 
 6 6 P. 291, Green v. JSTeal. 
 a 14 P. 156, Waldeu v. Bodlev. 
 6 15 P. 104, Brush c. Ware, 
 a 9 H. 36, Walden v. Bodley. 
 
 B0DIJ;Y, walden v. see Walden «. Bodley. 
 BOGABT v. THE JOHN JAY, 17 H. 400. 
 
 Admiralty jnrisdiction ; mort- 
 gages, a 
 
 a 19 H. 240, Schuchardt v. The An- 
 
 gelique. 
 a 20 H. 399, People's Ferry Co. v. 
 
 Beers. 
 a 21 Wall. 583, The Lotowanna. 
 
 BOGERT, GRIFFITH v. See Griffith v. Bogert. 
 BOGGS V. MINING CO., 3 W^aU. 309. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 262, Millengar ». Hartn- 
 
 pee. 
 b 92 U. S. 316, River Bridge Co. v. 
 
 Kan. Pac. R. R. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State courts ; Federal question, a 
 
 Trials without jury; review of 
 the facts found, b 
 BOISDOIEB, V. S. V. See IT. S. v. Boisdoire. 
 BOLEY V. GRISWOLD, 80 Wall. 486. 
 
 Replevin, a | a 22 Wall. 213, Sweeney v. Lomme 
 
 3 
 
34 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BOttES, DOTJGtASS CO. v. See Donglass Co. v. BoUes. 
 BOtLES, ROBERTS v. See Roberts v. Bolles. 
 BOIiMAN AND SWARTOUT, EX PARTE, 4 Cr. 75. 
 
 Hiibeiis coi-pus; jiirisdictioii Su- 
 pivme Cotu-t U. S. a 
 Jurisdiction of Ciroiiit. Couit. 6 
 Treason, c 
 
 BOND V. BROWN, 12 H. 856. 
 
 Fiiiilin^ of facts; review by Su- 
 preme Court, a 
 
 a 7 Wh. 41, ex parte Kearney. 
 a 3 P. 194, exparte Watliiiis. 
 a 7 P. 568, ex parte Watkius. 
 a 5H. 188, exparte Metz^er. 
 
 6 4 Wall. 110, exparte Millegau. 
 a 6 Wall. 324, exparte McCardle. 
 a 8 Wall. 97, exparte Yerjjer. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 166, exparte Lauge. 
 
 c 97 U. S. 6.5, Yoiino; u. U. S. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 374, ex paHe Siebold. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 103, Burr v. Des Moines. 
 a 15 Wall. 438, Riclimondij. Smith. 
 a 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. «. Folsom. 
 a 98 U. S. 443, The Abbotsford. 
 
 BONDURANT, WATSON v. See Watson v. Bondnrant. 
 
 BONESTBtl-, VOORHEES, v. See Toorliees u. Bonestell. 
 
 BONNAFEE v. WrLMAMS, 3 H. 677. 
 
 a 3 H. 288, Phillips v. Pi'cston. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; suits 
 by assio;nees of notes ; sec. 11 ju- 
 diciary act of 1789. a 
 
 Nominal and real parties. 6 
 
 a 21 H. 576, White «. Vermont & 
 Mass. R. R. Co. 
 6 20 Wall. 124, Knapp v. R. R. Co. 
 
 BONNEMER, GENERES v. See Generes ■». Bonnemer. 
 BONNER V. U. S., 9 WaU. 156. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 413, U. S. v. Glllis. 
 6 102 U. S. 404. U. S. v. Soliurz. 
 
 Court of 
 claims, a 
 Jurisdiction 
 
 Claims ; equitable 
 ; land claims. 6 
 
 BOON V. CHILES, 8 P. 538. 
 
 Equity; parties; when repre- I a 7 Wall. 415, R. R. Co. u.Howard 
 senteu by trustee. » | 
 
 BOON V. CHIXES, 10 P. 811. 
 
 Bona-tide puichasers. a 
 
 Pleading; probata must corre- 
 spond with allegata. 6 
 
 Constructive trusts; when bar- 
 red, c 
 
 Equity; " Qui prior estin tempore 
 portior est in jure. ' ' d 
 
 15 P. 104, Brush «. Ware. 
 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 
 4 H. .551, Michoud v. Girod. 
 
 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 1 HI. 518. Foster v. Goddard. 
 9 Wall. 793, Rubber Co. «. 
 
 Goodyear'. 
 a 12 Wall. 338, Villa v. Rodrigues. 
 dlOO U. S. 118, Lansdalc v. Dan- 
 iels. 
 
 BOORABM, HYDE v. See Hyde v. Booraem. 
 BOOTH, ABIEMAN v. See Ableman v. Booth. 
 BOOTH V. CLARK, 17 H. 388. 
 
 ^^'''=*^'^"'^- » |«14Wall.401,BaukBctheU.Pah- 
 
 BOOTH, V. S. V. see U. S. ...Booth. ' '^'""'1"" ^^"''• 
 
 BORDEN, lUTHER v. See Luther v., Borden 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, 
 
 35 
 
 BOSTON V. liECKAU, 17 H. 436. 
 
 Kuisances; drains and sewers; | a 19 H. 266, Richardson e. Boston, 
 liability of citj\ a | a 24 H. 191, Ricliardsou v. Boston. 
 
 BOSTON, RICHAKDSON v. See Eicliardson v. Boston. 
 BOSTON BELTING CO., CHAJTEE v. See Chaffee i>. Boston Belting Co. 
 BOSTON MAK. INS. CO., GRAVES v. See Graves v. Boston Mar. Ins. Co. 
 
 BOSWEIX V. OTIS, 9 H. 360. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; notice, a 
 Notice by publication. 6 
 
 a 24 H. 203, Nations «. Johnson. 
 a 1 Wall. 233, Baldwin v. Hale. 
 a 23 Wall. 136, Ray «.Noi-sevvorthy 
 a 91 U. S. 510, Earle v. McVeigh. 
 6 95 U. S. 724, Penuoyer v. Neff. 
 
 a 13 P. 446, Bagnell v. Brodeiick. 
 & 15 P. 104, Brusli v. Wear. 
 c 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 BOHLDIN V. MASSIE, 7 Wll. 147. 
 
 Public lands; presumption as to 
 regularity of patent, a 
 
 Virginia land law ; patents. 6 
 
 When title good without patent, c 
 BOUKNE, BEEKBTMAN v. See Merryman r. Bourne. 
 BOUTTVELI., U. S. v. See U. S. v. Boutwell. 
 BOWEN V. CHASE, 94 IT. S. 818. 
 
 Jnmel Will Case, a | a 98 U. S. 257, Bowen v. Chase. 
 
 BOWEN, CI.ABK v. See Clark d. Bowen. 
 BOWEN, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Bowen. 
 BOWMAN, STEIN t. See Stein 1). Bowman. 
 BOWMAN V. WATHEN, 1 H. 189. 
 
 Equity; laches; stale demands, a I a 7 H. 255, Wagner v. Baird. 
 
 I a S H. 218, Maxwell v. Kennedy. 
 
 BOWMAB, PKESTON v. See Preston v. Bowmar. 
 
 BOTCE V. ANDERSON, 8 P. 150. 
 
 Corporations; personal injuries; | a 13 P. 190, Stokes «. Saltonstall. 
 common carriers, a \ 
 
 BOYCE V. EDWARDS, 4 P. 123. 
 
 Negotiable paper; by what law 
 governed, a. 
 
 Drafts and bills; verbal promise 
 to accept, b 
 
 BOYCE V. GBUNT)T, 3 P. 310. 
 
 Equity; no iurisdictfbn where 
 there is complete remedy at law. a 
 
 a 4 H. 273, Musson v>. Lake. 
 b 18 Wall. 620, Espy v. Bank. 
 b 91 U. S. 414, Scudder v. Union 
 Nat. Baidi. 
 
 BOTCE V. GBTJNDY, 9 P. 890. 
 
 Supreme Court ; power to reverse 
 its own judgment, a. ' 
 
 Administrators; suits against; 
 judgments; as.sets. h 
 
 a 21 H. 091, Barber v. Barber. 
 a 2 Bl. 551, Parker v. Cotton Co. 
 a 5 Wall. 78, Watson v. Suther- 
 land. 
 a 7 Wall. 430, Payne «. Hook. 
 a 7 Wall. 618, Morgan v. Beloit. 
 a 13 Wall. 621, Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 
 a 15 Wall. 228, Oelrichs v. Spain. 
 a 23 Wall. 470, Lewis v. Cocks. 
 a 94 U. S. 811, Sullivan «.R.R. Co. 
 
 a 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. u. Moss. 
 b 93 U. S. 43, Smith v. Chapman. 
 
36 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 BOYD V. AliABAMA, 94 U. S. 64S. 
 
 Police powers of the States ; can- 
 not be bargained away, a 
 
 Rules governing courts in respect 
 to their past decisions. 6 
 
 BOYD, NUGENT v. See Nugent v. Boyd. 
 BOYD, U. S. T. Sen U. S. 1). Boyd. 
 BOYEK, STURGIS v. See Sturgis v. Boyer. 
 BOYLE, 30 HOGSHEADS OF SUGAR t. 
 BOYLE V. ZACHARIB, 6 P. 348. 
 
 Constitutionality of State insol- 
 vent laws, a 
 
 BOYLE T. ZACHARIE, 6 P. 648. 
 
 Supreme Conrt; writs of error; 
 linal judgments, a 
 
 Conflict of laws; by what law 
 contracts governed. 6 
 
 U. S; courts ; vsfhen they will fol- 
 low the State decisions, c 
 
 Equity jurisdiction of U. S. courts 
 not affected by State decisions or 
 legislation, d 
 
 Execution ; stay ; supersedeas, e 
 
 a 97 U. S. 33, Beer Co. v. Mass. 
 6 101 U. S. 686, Douglass v. Pike 
 
 Co. 
 a 101 U. S. 818, Stone C.Mississippi 
 
 See 30 Hogsheads of Sugar v. Boyle. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 230, Baldwin v. Hale. 
 
 a 12 P. 327, Toland v. Sprague. 
 
 a 14 P. 1, Evans v. Gee. 
 
 6 5 H. 307, Cook v. Moffat. 
 
 a 9 H. 548, Bayard v. Lombard. 
 
 c 12 H. 145, Russell v. Soutliard. 
 
 d 13 H. 270, Neves v. Scott. 
 
 b 19 H. 391, Buckley v. Honald. 
 
 o 20 H. 555, McCargo v. Chapman. 
 
 d 2 Bl. 509, Noonan v. Lee. 
 
 e 3 Wall. 700, U. S. v. Dashiel. 
 
 d 6 Wall. 195, Eiggs v. Johnson. 
 
 d 8 Wall. 323, Clark v. Eeyburn. 
 
 d 99 U. S. 401, Smith v. E. E. Co. 
 BOYREAU, CAMPBELI, v. See Campbell v. Boyreau. 
 BBABSTON V. GIBSON, 9 H. 863. 
 
 Contracts; governed by law of I a 99 U. S. 218, Supervisors v. Gal- 
 place of performance, a \ braith. 
 BBACKETT, BROWN v. See Brown v. Braokett. 
 BRADBN, DAYIS V. See Dayls v. Braden. 
 BBADEN, DOE v. See Doe v. Braden. 
 BRADFORD v. UNION BANK OF TENN., 13 H. 67. 
 
 Equity; relief against fraud; re- 
 forming instruments; parol evi- 
 dence, a 
 
 BRADLEY, EX PARTE, 7 Wall. 364. 
 
 District of Columbia; organiza- 
 tion of courts, a 
 Attorneys; disbarment. 6 
 Mandamus, o 
 
 a 98 U. S. 89, Snell v. Ins. Co. 
 
 11 Wall. 258, Garnett v. U. S. 
 13 Wall. 345, Bradley v. Fisher. 
 19 Wall. 513, eaiparte Robinson, 
 c 100 U. S. 324, "Virginia v. Rives. 
 
 BRADLEY, CONNER v. See Conner v. Bradley. 
 BRADLEY v. FISHER, 13 WaU. 354. 
 
 Attorneys; contempt; disbar- l a 19 Wall. 513, ex parte Eobinson. 
 
 BRADLEY, NOON AN v. See Noonan •». Bradley. 
 BRADLEY v. THE PEOPLE, 4 WaU. 468. 
 
 Constitution ; taxation by States 
 of national securities, a 
 
 "Shares" of corporations and 
 "capital stock." 6 
 
 a 7 Wall. 699, Austin v. Alderm'n. 
 a 9 Wall. 590, Thompsons Pacific 
 
 Eailroad. 
 9o U. S. 687, Farringtonu.Tenn. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 37 
 
 BRADIEY, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Bradley. 
 
 BBADIET V. WASH., A. & G. PACKET CO., 13 P. 94. 
 
 Contracts ; parol evidence, a \ a 102 U. S. 65, U. S. v. Peck. 
 BRADIiETS, BArCBOAD CO. v. See Railroad Oo. v. Bradleys. 
 BBADSTBEET, EX PARTE, 4 P. 106. 
 
 Bills of exception ; at what time 
 exceptions must be taken, and 
 when drawn out and signed, a 
 
 a 6 H. 274, Sheppai-d v. Wilson. 
 u, 16 H. 2], Turner i). Yates. 
 a 102 U. S. 358, Hnnnicutt v. Pey- 
 ton. 
 
 BBADSTBEET, EX PABTE, 6 P. 774. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandamus, a 
 
 a 7 P. 647, ex parte Bradstreet. 
 a 8 P. 588, ex parte Bradstreet. 
 a 9 P. 574, Life & Fire Ins. Co. v. 
 
 Adams. 
 a 12 P. 59, Bradstreet v. Thomas. 
 a 12 P. 174, Bradstreet v. Thomas. 
 
 BBADSTBEET, EX PABTE, 7 P. 647 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter 
 in dispute; wlien it can be shown 
 at trial, a 
 
 Mandamus; power of tlie Circuit 
 Court to reinstate case, b 
 
 BBADSTBEET v. HUNTINGTON, 
 
 Estoppel ; vendor and vendee, a 
 Bona-lide purchasers, b 
 Limitations ; adverse possession ; 
 right of entry ; ejectment, c 
 
 a 3 Wall. 494, Beard v. Federy. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 442, The Grace Girdler. 
 
 6 7 Wall. 270, Litchfield <;. B. B. 
 Co. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 376, ex parte Bradley. 
 
 h 14 Wall. 166, ex parte Newman. 
 
 6 16 Wall. 270, Ins. Co. v. Corn- 
 stock. 
 
 5 P. 404. 
 
 a 16 P. 54, Watkins v. Hoi man. 
 6 5 Wall. 268, Croxall v. Shererd. 
 a 14 Wall. 146, Armstrong v. Mor- 
 i-ill. 
 a 94 U. S. 776. Hogan v. Kurtz. 
 
 BBADSTBEET v. POTTER, 16 P. 318. 
 
 Supreme Court; dismissal for I a 9 Wall. 567, Hornthall v. Collect- 
 want of jurisdiction ; costs, a I or. 
 
 BBADSTBEET V. THOMAS, 12 P. 60. 
 
 Jurisdiction of U. 
 zenship. a 
 
 S. courts; citi- a 15 P. 127, Smith v. Clapp. 
 
 a 16 P. 318, Bradstreet v. Potter. 
 a 8 H. 605, Kennedy v. State B'k 
 of Georgia. 
 
 BRAELSFORD, GEORGIA v. See Georgia u. Brailsford. 
 BBA1>IEI.I., LBS BOIS v. See Les Bois v. Bramell. 
 BRANCH V. CHABI.ESTON, 93 V. S. 677. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- a 94 U. S. 693, 
 tracts ; exemption of railroad from 
 taxation ; consolidation, a 
 
 BBANCH, TOMI.INSON v. See Tomlinson v. Branch. 
 BBANDON V. rOFTirS, 4 H. 187. 
 
 Scotland Co. 
 Thomas. 
 
 Negotiable paper; evidence of 
 notary public as to protest; valid- 
 ity of Mississippi statute on the 
 subject, a 
 
 BBANSON, WIBTH v. See Wirtli !). Branson. 
 
 a 6 H. 5, Sims v. Hundley. 
 
38 
 
 MANUAL or SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BRANTLT, FOTVXEB v. See Fowler v. Brantly. 
 V. MASON, 6 H. 108. . 
 
 to TJ. S. officials ; 
 
 a 7 H. 122, Wilkes v. Diiismaii. 
 a 11 H. 287, Reeside v. Walker. 
 a 17 H. 229, U. S. v. Seaman. 
 a 17 H. 301. U. S. v. Giitlii-ie. 
 6 6 Wall. 497, ex parte DeGroot. 
 a 9 Wall. 312, Secretary v. Mc- 
 Garrahan. 
 
 a 14 P. 53, West v. Brashear. 
 6 98 U. S. 510, Reed v. Mclntyre. 
 
 BRASHEAR 
 
 Mandamus 
 discretionary powers; jnrisdiction 
 of the courts of District of Colum- 
 bia, u, 
 
 Remedy to reverse judgment re- 
 fusing mandamus is by writ of 
 error. 6 
 
 BRASHEAR v. WEST, 7 F. 608. 
 
 Snpreme Court ; mandate, a 
 Riglit of debtor to prefer cred- 
 itors, b 
 
 BRASHEAR, "WEST v. See West v. Brashear. 
 BRASHIER V. GRATZ, 6 Wh. 588. 
 
 Equity ; relief in ; laches ; when i a 14 P. 173, Taylor v. Longworth. 
 time essence of contract, a | 
 
 BRAUN V. SAUERWEEN, 10 Wall. 218. 
 
 CoUeotors; suits against to re- I a 12 Wall. 11, Collector t>. Hubbard. 
 cover back taxes, a | a 92 U. S. 90, Clieatliam v. U. S. 
 
 BREEDLOVB, GWIN v. See Gwin v. Breedlove. 
 
 BREEDLOVE v. ICCCHOXAT, 7 P. 434. 
 
 Louisiana; insolvent law; notice | a 10 P. 283, Haydel v. Girod. 
 to creditors, a | 
 
 BREIXHATJPT T. BAKK OP GEORGIA, 1 P. 238. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction ; citi- I a 18 Wall. 575, Sewing Machine 
 zenship. a. \ Co. Case. 
 
 BREITLING, TJ. 8. v. See U. S. o. Breitling. 
 BRENT V. BANK OP METROPOLIS, 1 P. 89. 
 
 Negotiable paper; presentment; | a 300 U. S. 713, Cox v. National- 
 parol evidence of agreement, a | Bank. 
 
 BRENT V. BANK OF WASHINGTON, 10 P. 596. 
 
 U. S.; priority of. a [a 12 P. 31, Beaston v. Farmers' B'k. 
 
 BRENT V. CHAPMAN, 6 Cr. 358. 
 
 a n Wh. 361, Shelby B. Guy. 
 6 16P. 296, U. S. u.Eliason. 
 a 9 H. 413, Townsend v. Jennison. 
 b 20 H. 434, Suydam v. Williamson. 
 K Brent. 
 
 Statute of limitation ; detinue, a 
 Supreme Court; writs of error on 
 agreed case. 6 
 
 BRENT, KENNEDY v. See Kennedy 
 BBEWARD, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Breward. 
 BREWER V. BLOUGHER, 14 P. 178. 
 
 Wills: effect of change of law on 
 
 ^^■ills made prior to such change, a 
 
 Construction ; general words. 6 
 
 a 16 H. 279, Carroll v. Carroll. 
 
 b 13 Wall. 164, Reiche v. Smitli. 
 
 b 18 Wall. 302, Atkins v. Disinte- 
 grating Co. 
 
 101 U. S. 116, Market Co. v. Hoff- 
 man. 
 
 BREWER, CREWS v. See Crews v. Brewer. 
 
 BREWSTER, CHITTENDEN v. See Chittenden «. Brewster. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 39 
 
 BREWSTER v. WAKEFIEIiD, 28 H 
 
 U. S. courts in Louisiana ; equity 
 aiirl law must be kept distinct, a 
 Interest. 6 
 
 Where no interest is stipulated, c 
 Knle after maturity of note, d 
 
 lis. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 442, Wallreru. Dreville. 
 a 20 Wall. 622, Murdock v. Mem- 
 phis. 
 6 22 Wall. 176, BurnliiselDFirman 
 c 96 U. S. 61, Cromw'l v. Sao Co, 
 d 100 U. S. 74, Hoklen v. Trust Uo. 
 
 BRIDGEPORT, THE, 14 Wall. 119. 
 
 Collision witli vessel at anchor, a | a 97 U. S. 315, The Va. Ehrnian. 
 
 BRIDGE PROPRIETORS v. HOBOKEN CO., 1 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to 
 State court ; Federal question ; liow 
 to be shown, a 
 
 Constitution; exemption from 
 taxation ; when tlie U. S. courts 
 follow the decisions of the State 
 courts. 6 
 
 Wall. 116. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 384, The Victory. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 384, Knox v. Ex. Bank. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 23, Kennebec R. R. v. 
 
 Portland R. R. 
 a 14 Wall. 668, Delraas v. Ins. Co. 
 a 20 Wall. 628, MurdockuMemphis 
 a 21 Wall. 549, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 a 96 U. S. 442, Murray u.Charl't'n 
 6 97 U. S. 709, R. B. Co. v. Gaines. 
 a 99 U. S. 321, Universityu.People 
 
 a 95 U. S. 98, Good v. Martin. 
 
 BRIDGES V. ARMOUR, 5 H. 94. 
 
 Territorial courts ; aVe not courts 
 of the IT. S. under the Constitu- 
 tion, a 
 
 BRIDGES V. SPEBKT, 95 U. S. 401. 
 
 IT. S. courts; citizenship; how it I a 97 IT. S. 648, Robertson v. Cease, 
 must appear. | 
 
 BRIBN, GROVE v. See GroTe v. Brien. 
 BBIGGS, DAVIE V. See Davie v. Bnggs. 
 BRIGGS, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Briggs. 
 BRIGHATW, RANDAXI. v. See Randall v. Brigham. 
 BBIGNAKDEtLO v. GRAY, 1 Wall. 687. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 
 a 2 Wall. 641, Minnesota Co. v. St. 
 Paul Co. 
 
 BKINE V. INS. CO., 96 U. S. 68'?. 
 
 U. S. courts; how far governed 
 by practice of State coin-ts ; fore- 
 closure of moitgages; rule of prop- 
 erty, a 
 
 BRISCOE V. BANK OF KENTUCKY, 11 P. 257. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 145, Allis v. Ins. Co. 
 a 98 U. S.- 178, Orvis v. Powell. 
 a 102 U. S. 451, Swift v. Smith. 
 
 Writs of error to State courts, a 
 Powei' of States to incorporate 
 
 banks. 6 
 Constitution ; bills of credit, c 
 Government; action does not lie 
 
 against, unless by itsownconsent. d 
 State by owning stock in a bank 
 
 does not impart to the corporation 
 
 any of its privileges, e 
 Supreme Court ; when it will not 
 
 hear constitutional questions, f 
 
 BBITTAN V. BARNABY, 21 H. 532. 
 
 Affreiglitment; carriers; deliv- 
 ery, a 
 
 a 14 P. 57, Commonwealth Bank 
 V. Griffith. 
 
 6 8 H. 79, Nathan v. Louisiana. 
 
 c 10 H. 203, Woodruff v. Trapnall. 
 
 d 11 H. 287, Reeside v. Walker. 
 
 c 13 H. 13, Darrington v. State 
 Bank. 
 
 e 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas. 
 
 d 6 Wall. 488, U. S. ?}. Eckford. 
 
 / 12 Wall. 554, Legal Tender Cas. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 495, Tlie Eddy. 
 
40 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BBITTON, POLICE JURY v. See Police Jury v. Britton. 
 BBOADNAX, SUYDAM v. See Suydam v. Broadnax. 
 BROBST V. BBOBST, 2 WaU. 96. 
 
 Snpieine Coiu-t ; appeal bond ; 
 when appeiil will not be dismissed 
 for defect in. a 
 
 BBOBST V. BBOBST, 10 TFaU. 588. 
 
 Supreme Court; error; in order 
 to reverse, the error must have 
 worked an injury, a 
 
 a 5 Wall. 822, Seymour v. Freer. 
 a 12 Wall. 149, Bigler v. WiiUer. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 301, Decatur Bank v. 
 St. Louis Bank. 
 a 91 U. S. 28, McLemore v. Louis- 
 iana Bank. 
 
 BBOCKETT v. BROCKBTT, 8 H. 340. 
 
 Supreme Court; final decrees, a 
 Time within which writ of error 
 must be sued out ; supersedeas. 6 
 Citation ; when unnecessary, c 
 Kehearinfi;s. d 
 
 BBOCKETT V. BBOCKETT, 3 H. 
 
 Error ; appellate court will not 
 
 consider issues out of chancery, a 
 
 Master's report ; exceptions to. 6 
 
 a 14 H. 2, Wylie v. Coxp. 
 a 18 H. 508, McMicken v. Perin. 
 a 7 Wall. 578, K. Co. v. Bradleys. 
 b 10 Wall. 289, Slaughter- House 
 
 Cases. 
 6 93 U. S. 418, Sage v. Cent. R. E. 
 6 94 U. S. 717, Memphis v. Brown. 
 c 95 U. S. 258, Milner v. Meek. ' 
 d 95 U. S. 287, Cambuston v. U. S. 
 691. 
 
 BBOIJBRICK'S 'WXLI,, al WaU. 509. 
 
 U. S. courts ; probate of will can- 1 
 not be collaterally assailed, a \ 
 
 BBODEBICK, BAGNEI.I. v. See Bagnell v. Broderick. 
 BRODIE, CATLiETT v. See Catlett o. Brodie. 
 BBOMI.EY, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Bromley. 
 BRONSON V. KrNZIE, 1 H. 311. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; remedy, a 
 
 a 7 H. 227, McLaughlin v. Bank. 
 6 8 H. 409, West v. Smith. 
 a 92 U. S. (595, Garsed v. Beall. 
 b 100 U. S. 526, Mt. Pleasant v. 
 
 Beck with'. 
 a 101 U. S. 253, Watt v. Starke. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 21, Gaines v. Fuentes, 
 
 2 H. 611, McCracken v. Hay- 
 
 ward. 
 8 H. 713, Gantly v. Ewing. 
 6 H. 318, Plant. Banki). Sharp. 
 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas. 
 24 H. 464, Howard v. Bughee. 
 2 Wall. 21, Hawth'ne v. Calef. 
 4 Wall. 550, Van Hoffman v. 
 Quincv. 
 a 5 Wall. 300, Christmas v. Rus- 
 sell. 
 a 8 Wall. 322, Clark v. Reyburn. 
 a 8 Wall. 583, Bntz v. Muscatine. 
 a 96 U. S. 74, Term. v. Snced. 
 a 96 U. S. 603, Edwards v. Kear- 
 
 zey. 
 a 96 U. S. 637, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 a 102 U. S. 419, Daniels v. Tearney 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 41 
 
 BRONSON V. LA CROSSE R. R. CO., 1 WaU. 405. 
 
 U. S. District Courts; District 
 Courts of Wisconsin, a 
 
 BRONSON V. lA CROSSE R. R. CO. 
 
 Corporation ; wlien stocltiiolder 
 can sue in liis own name on refusal 
 of directors, a 
 Parties to suits ; liow admitted. 6 
 Railri'ad mortgages ; wiien com- 
 pany estopped from denj'ing in- 
 debtedness, c 
 
 BRONSON -v. RATLROAD CO., 8 Bl, 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals ; final 
 decrees, a 
 
 BRONSON V. BODES, 7 WaU. 345. 
 
 Constitution ; legal tender ; con- 
 tracts to pay in gold, a 
 
 BROOKLYN INS. CO. v. TJ. S., 99 U 
 
 Count}' and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads ; decrees enjoining 
 tlieir pstyraent and declaring them 
 void ; liow far binding on bond- 
 liolders not parties ; constructive 
 service, a 
 
 Recitals ; conditions ; estoppel ; 
 bona-fide holders, b 
 
 a 2 Wall. 632, Minnesota Co. v. St. 
 
 Paul Co. 
 a 5 Wall. 662, E. B. Co. v. Soutter. 
 
 8 WaU. 383. 
 
 ffl 8 Wall. 73, Memphis u. Dean. 
 b 94 U. S. 21, ex parte Cutting. 
 c 94 U. S. 736, Jerome v. McCarter. 
 
 534. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 98, French u. Shoemaker 
 a 17 Wall. 17, Marin v. Lally. 
 
 444, Bronson v. Kimpton 
 606, Hepburn v. Gris- 
 
 wold. 
 380, Dewing v. Sears. 
 
 695, Trebilcoek y.Wilson 
 672, The Emily Sender. 
 
 696, Thompson v. Butler 
 624, Gregory v. Morris. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 92, Empire v. Darling- 
 ton. 
 
 6 101 U. S. 129, Roberts v. Bolles. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 413, Livingston v. Dar- 
 lington. 
 
 a 
 
 8 Wall. 
 
 a 
 
 8 Wall. 
 
 a 
 
 11 Wall. 
 
 a 
 
 12 Wall. 
 
 a 
 
 17 Wall. 
 
 a 
 
 95 U. S. 
 
 a 
 
 96 U. S. 
 
 S 
 
 . 362. 
 
 BROOKS V. FISKE, 15 H. 319. 
 
 Patent law; infringement. 
 Combinations. 6 
 Construction of patents, c 
 
 a a 15 Wall. 194, Gould v. Eees. 
 
 6 22 Wall. 28, Gill v. Wells. 
 
 b 23 Wall. 367, Reedv v. Scott. 
 
 c 98 U. S. 38, Bates v. Coe. 
 BROOKS, LUCAS V. See Lucas v. Brooks. 
 BROOKS V. MARBURT, 11 Wh. 83. 
 
 Mortgages and sales ; difference i a 11 H. 392, Fowler v. Merrill, 
 between, a I 
 
 BROOKS, MARBURT v. See MarbnryD. Brooks. 
 BROOKS, MARSH v. See Marsh v. Brooks. 
 BROOKS V. MARTIN, 3 WaU. 70. 
 
 Contracts; illegality, a 
 Notice, b 
 
 BROOKS V. NORRIS, 11 H. 304. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of eri'or ; 
 service of. a 
 
 BROOKS V. RAILWAY CO., 101 U. 
 
 Mechanics' liens, a \ 
 
 BROOKS, U. S. V. See TJ. S. o. Brooks. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 500, Planters' Bank v. 
 
 Union Bank. 
 6 95 U. S. 579, R.R. Co. v. Durant. 
 
 I a 3 Wall. 701. U. S. v. Dashiel. 
 I a 6 Wall. 360, Mussina v. Cavazos. 
 
 S. 443. 
 
 I a 101 U. S. 730, Meyer v. Hornby. 
 
42 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BROOME T. COtliECTOK, 15 H. 14,3. 
 
 al9H. 75, U. S. u. Lo Baron. 
 6 97 U. S. 592, Gaiisseii v. U. S. 
 
 Bonds of collectors ; when deem- 
 ed to be delivered, a 
 Liability of sureties, b 
 
 BKOUGHTON v. PENSACOLA, 93 U. S. 866. 
 
 Municipal corporations ; efleet of I a 95 U. S. 654, N. Oi-leans u. Clark, 
 annexation on debts, o a 100 U.S. 52S, Mt. Pleasant v. 
 
 I Beckwitli. 
 
 BKOTVOEB, McAETHUB v. See McArthur v. Browder. 
 BKOWDER V. McABrTHUB, 7 Wh. 58. 
 
 Writ of error; mandate; second 
 appeal . a 
 
 Supreme Court ; rehearing. 6 
 
 a 12 P. 491, exparte Sibbald. 
 
 a 3 H. 424, Bridge Co. v. Stewart. 
 
 a 16 H. 102, Sizer v. Many. 
 
 6 18 H. 42, Peclf v. Sanderson. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 129, Nooiianw. Bvadley. 
 
 6 17 Wall. 283, Tyler v. Maguira. 
 BKOWTDEB, PRESTON v. See Preston v. Browder. 
 BROWN T. ASPDEN, 14 H. 88. 
 
 Judgments by divided court, a 
 Supreme Court ; rehearings. b 
 
 a 7 Wall. 112, Durant v. Essex 
 Co. 
 
 6 9 Wall. 604, Public Schools ». 
 Walker. 
 
 6 14 Wall. 22, Steincs v. Frank- 
 lin Co. 
 
 6 102 U. S. 108, Brooks B. B.K.Co. 
 
 BROWN V. ATWEI.1,, 98 U. S. 397. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error I a 98 IT. S. 142, Citizens' Bk. v. Bd. 
 to State courts ; Federal question, a \ of Liquidation. 
 
 BROWN, BLANCHARD v. S^e Blanchard ». Brown. 
 BROWN, BOND v. See Bond v. Brown. 
 BROW^N V. BRACKETT, 21 WaU. 387. 
 
 Land claims ; decrees in name of I o 97 U. S. 208,'McMiclcen v. Periu. 
 " legal representatives." a \ 
 
 BROWN V. BUENA VISXA, 9S V. S. 161. 
 
 Equity ; laches, a 
 
 BROWN, CASE V. ^ee Case v. Brown. 
 BROWN V. CtAEK, 4 H. 4. 
 
 Judgment; liens of. a 
 
 Bills of exceptions. 6 
 
 Error; refusal to grant new trial 
 not assignable, c 
 
 When error cannot he assigned 
 for the fiist time in the Supreme 
 Court, d 
 
 BROWN V. CLEMENTS, 3 H. 666. 
 
 Land laws; pre-emption; act of 
 May 29, 1830. a. 
 
 Act of May 24, 1820; surveys 
 and subdivisions of fractional sec- 
 tions, b 
 
 BR.OWN, DAVIS v. See Dayis v. Brown. 
 
 u 99 U. S. 212, Goddeii c. Kimball. 
 a 101 U. S. 568, National Bank v. 
 Carpenter. 
 
 a 13 H. 163, Biickingh'mu. McLean 
 
 6 16 H. 19, Turner b. Yates. 
 
 c 1 Wall. 598, Pomeroy v. Bank of 
 
 Indiana. 
 d 20 Wall. 418, Mays v. Fritton. i 
 
 a 9 H. 328, Lyttle v. Arkansas. 
 20 H. .374, Gazzam v. Elam. 
 6 7Wall. 289, K. R. Co.«. Schur- 
 mur. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT- DECISIONS. 
 
 43 
 
 BROTTN V. GELMAN, 4 -Wli. 877. 
 
 Validity of tlecd not reconled, in 
 Georgia, a 
 
 BROWTN V. BtlATTS, 15 'Wall. 1S3. 
 
 Limitiitions ; suspension during 
 tlw civil wai'. a 
 
 Payments lo agent in enemy's 
 countrv. 6 
 
 a 7 Wli. 237, Browi'i v. Jaclison. 
 
 a IS AYull. 155, Batosvillo Inst. v. 
 
 Kaulman. 
 a 2-2 Wall. .586, Boss v. Jones. 
 6 95 U. S. 432, Ins. Co. v. Davis. 
 a 96 U. S. 193, Williams v. Bniffy. 
 See lasigi v. Brown. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 712, Pike v. Wassail. 
 
 a 10 P. 128, Brandei- v. Phillips. 
 
 6 16 H. 21, Tui-ner v. Yates. 
 
 c 10 Wall. 149, Field v. Fai-rington. 
 
 BROWN, lASIGI T. 
 
 BROWN V. KEENE, 8 P. 115. 
 
 U. S. courts ; citizenship ; how I o 97 U. S. 649, Robertson v. Cease, 
 shown, a \ 
 
 BROWN V. KENNEDY, 15 Wall. 597. 
 
 Confiscation, a 
 
 BROWN V. McGBA'W, 14 P. 495. 
 
 Lien of factor, a 
 Contracts; by correspondence; 
 effect of the letters for the jurj'. 6 
 Eight of factors to sell, c 
 
 BROWN V. MARTLAND, 13 WTi. 419 
 
 Supreme Court ; practice ; au- 
 thentication of record, a 
 
 Constitution ; State tax on im- 
 ports ; regulation of commerce ; 
 police power. 6 
 
 Construction of Constitution ; 
 Supreme Court final arbiter of con- 
 stitutional questions, c 
 
 Concurrent powers, d 
 
 Power of State to tax means em- 
 ployed, by Congress to carrj' into 
 cxec.nlion its powerfe. e 
 
 a 6 P. 536, Worcester v. Georgia. 
 6 11 P. 102, New Yorli v Miln. 
 c 12 P. 714, Rliode Island v. Mass. 
 6 5 H. 573i, License Cases. (Opin. 
 
 of Taney, Ch. J.) 
 & 7 H. 392, Passenger Cas. (Opin. 
 
 of McLean, J.) 
 6 14 H. 572, Veazie v. Moore. 
 (ilS H. 336, Dodge v. Woolscy. 
 6 22 H. 238, Sinnot v. Davenport. 
 6 24 H. 172. AhTiy v. California. 
 d 3 Wall. 730, Gilman v. Pliila. 
 b 5 Wall. 478, Pervear v. Com'on- 
 
 wealth. 
 d 6 Wall. 47, Crandell v. Nevada 
 e 6 Wall. 605, Soc. for Sav. v. Colt. 
 6 8 Wall. 121, Waring v. Mayor. 
 6 8 Wall. 150, Hinson v. Lott. 
 6 12 Wall. 216, State Ton. Tax Cas. 
 6 12 Wall. 429, Wai'd ». Maryland. 
 6 13 Wall. 32, Low D. Austin. 
 6 15 Wall. 295, State Tax Railway 
 
 Gross Receipts. 
 e 91 U. S. 34, Nat. B'li: v. Dearing 
 h 91 U. S. 278, Welton U.Missouri. 
 6 93 U. S. 103, Slierlock v. Ailing. 
 6 94 U. S. 247, Fosters. N.Orleans 
 a 94 U. S. 542, Doyle v. Ins. Co. 
 6 96 U. S. 446, Murrayu. Charles'n 
 6 97 U. S. 33, Beer Co. v. Mass. 
 6 97 U. S. 573, Cook v. Penn. 
 e 99 U. S. 279, Tr. Co. u. Wheeling 
 6 100 U. S. 439, Guy v. Baltimore. 
 6 100 U. S. 677, Mach'e Co. v. Gage 
 h 102 U. S. 126, TiernauB.Rinker. 
 
44 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BBO'WN, MILLS v. See Mills v. Brown, 
 BKOAVN V. PIERCE, 7 Wall. »14 
 
 Duress, a 
 
 a 12 Wall. 157. Baker v. Morton. 
 al4 Wall. 333, French v. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 a 16 Wall. 432, U. S. v. Hiickabee. 
 a 17 Wall. 74, Mason v. U. S. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 198, Dnnbar v. Myers. 
 6 99 U. S. 201, Ex. Co. U.K. K. Co. 
 c 99 U. S. 593, Terhiiiie v. Pliillips. 
 a 102 U. S. 378, Densmore v. Scho- 
 
 fiekl. 
 d 102 U. S.419, Daniels v. Teariiey. 
 
 See Randell v. Brown. 
 
 BROWTf V. PIPEB, 91 TJ. S. 38. 
 
 Patent law; "invention." a 
 
 Equity ; dismissal of bill fornant 
 of equity. 6 
 
 Patents; "general use." c 
 
 Statutes; construction; sur- 
 rounilino' circumstances, d 
 
 BROWN, RAjyDEIiL, v. 
 
 BROWN V. SHANNON, 20 H. 66. 
 
 Supreme Court; value of matter I a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty, 
 in dispute, a I 
 
 BROWN V. SWAICN, 9 P. 1. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a | a 19 H. 284, Beebe v. Eussell. 
 
 BROW^N V. SWAN^N, 10 P. 497. 
 
 Usury; relief in equitj'. a | a 10 P. 521, Stanley v. Gadsby. 
 
 BBOWN V. TARKINGTON, 3 Wall. 377. 
 
 Illegal contracts ; notes given for a 4 Wall. 456, Davidson v. Lanier, 
 settlement of accounts with illegal 
 banking company, a 
 
 BROWTf , TATIOB v. See Taylor v. Brown. 
 
 BROWN V. UNION BANK OP PLOBtDA, 4 H. 4G5. 
 
 Supreme Ct. ; final judgments, a I a 18 Wall. 588, Moore v. Robbins. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 654, Panels v. Johnson. 
 
 BROWN V. U. S., 8 Cr. 181. 
 
 War; confiscation of debts ; when I a 6 Wall. 537, Hanger v. Abbott, 
 right to sue is only suspended, a | a 96 U. S. 284, Conrad v. Waples. 
 
 BR0W:N v. WILEY, 30 H. 449. 
 
 ISTegotiable paper; parol evi- | a 95 U. S. 480, Brown v. Spofford. 
 dence. a 
 
 BROWN, TVOODWARD v. See Woodward v. Brown. 
 BROWNE, LAMAR v. See Lamar v. Browne. 
 BROW^NE T. STRODE, 6 Cr. 303. 
 
 Jurisdiction Circuit Court; suits 
 by administrators; citizenship, a 
 
 U. S. courts ; enforcement of 
 State laws. 6 
 
 Formal parties, c 
 
 a 14 P. 298, Irvine v. Lowry. 
 6 2 H. 13, McNutt v. Bland. 
 a 11 Wall. 176, Coal Co. u. Blatch- 
 
 ford. 
 a 13 Wall. 67, Rice v. Houston. 
 a 20 Wall. 123, Knapp b. R. R. Co. 
 c 101 U. S. 589, Waldenc. Skinner. 
 
 BRUCE V. U. S., 17 H. 439. 
 
 U. S.; suits on official bonds ; | a 100 U. S. 11, Soule » U S 
 sureties; treasury transcripts, a | a 102 U. S. 553, U. S. v. Piuson. 
 BRUEN, BELI. v. See Bell v. Bruen. 
 BRUPPY, WILLIAMS v. See Williams v. Bruffy. 
 BRUNE, MARRIOTT v. See Marriott v. Brune. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 45 
 
 BRUSH V. ■WARE, 16 P. 106. 
 
 Land titles ; when valid without 
 patent, a 
 
 BBTAN V. FORSYTH, 19 H. 336. 
 
 Illinois land titles ; lots in Peoria ; 
 act Marcli 3, 1823 ; limitations, a 
 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 a24H. 143, Hall u. Papin. 
 
 a 24 H. 178, Meehan v. Forsyth. 
 
 a 24 H. 182, Gregg v. Forsyth. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 152, Gregs v. Tesson. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 568, Dredge v. Forsyth. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 573, Kellogg v. Forsyth. 
 BRYAN, YOUNG v. See Young v. Bryan. 
 BRYANT, VANNEVAB v. See Vannevar v. Bryant. 
 BUCHANAN, HOZEY v. See Hozey v. Buchanan. 
 BUCHANAN v. SMITH, 16 Wall. 877. 
 
 Banlirnptcy ; frandnlent prefer- 
 ences, a 
 
 Acts of bankruprcj'. 6 
 
 Distrilmtion pro rata of bank- 
 vnpt's property, main object of the 
 bankrupt act. c 
 
 a 17 Wall. 487, Wilson u. City Bank 
 a 21 Wall. 427, Michaels u. Post. 
 a 94 U. S. 557, Dntcher v. Wi-ight. 
 a 95 U. S. 346, Mer. Nat. Bank v. 
 
 Cook. 
 6 98U. S. 194, Stewart v. Sonne- 
 
 born. 
 c 98 U. S. 512, Keed v. Mclntyre. 
 
 BUCHANNON v. UPSHA^W, 1 H. 82. 
 
 Equity; rescission, a | a 15 Wall. 379, Kimball v. West 
 
 BUICK, SHERMAN v. See Sherman v. Buiok. 
 BUCK T. CHESAPEAKE INS. CO., 1 P. 160. 
 
 Insurance ; what insurer bound 
 to know, a 
 Instructions to the jury; court 
 6 
 process in 
 
 not bound to modify, 
 Admiralty; liens; 
 
 rem. c 
 Insurable Interest. 
 
 d 
 
 a 8 H. 245, Clark v.. Man. Ins. Co. 
 b 15 AVall. 674, Baffin v. Mason, 
 c 20 Wall. 163, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 d 98 U. S. 538, Hooper u.Kobinson 
 
 BUCK V. COI.BATH, 3 "Wall. 341. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction ; U. S. and 
 State courts, a 
 
 a 6 Wall. 196, Kiaasu. Johns. Co. 
 a 10 Wall. 25, MoKee v. Kains. 
 a 14 Wall. 82, Christmas t>. Kus- 
 
 sell. 
 a 20 Wall. 393, New Orleans v. 
 
 Steamship Co. 
 a 102 Wall. 262, People's Bank v. 
 
 Calhoun. 
 a 102 Wall. 689, Sliarpe v. Doyle. 
 BUCKINGHAM, COM. BANK v. See Com. Bank v. Buckingham. 
 BUCKINGHAM, SCH. FREEMAN v. See Schooner Freeman v. Buckingham. 
 BUCKINGHAM V. MctEAN, 13 H. 150. 
 
 Supreme Coui-t ; citation ; motion I a 20 H. 206, Carroll u. Dorsey. 
 to dismiss for want of. a 6 5 Wall. 412, The William Bag- 
 
 Keve.rsal; generally an appellant aley. 
 
 only can ask. b I 6 12 Wall. 135, Mail Co. u. Flanders. 
 
 BUCKLEY V. NAUMKEAG COTTON CO., 24 H. 389. 
 
 Shipping; use of lighters, a 
 "Perils;" in exceptions in bills 
 of ladings, h 
 
 a 8 Wall. 115, Waring v. Mayor. 
 6 8 Wall. 162. The Prop. Mahawk. 
 a 9 Wall. 521, The Keokuk. 
 
46 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BUCKLEY V. U. S., 4 H. 352. 
 
 Revenue laws; seizures by col- I a 3 Wall. 143, Cliqiiot's Champagne 
 lectors; pi'obable cause, a | 
 
 BTJCKtEY V. U. S., 19 ^Wa,U. 37. 
 
 Contracts ; breach j damages, a \ a 100 U. S. 507, Parish v. U. S. 
 BUCKLEY, WITHEKS v. See Withers v. Buckley. 
 BUCKNBB V. EINDIiEY, 8 P. 589. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; vvliat are for- 
 eign bills of exchange ; the States 
 are foriMgn to each other as respects 
 the regulation of contracts, a 
 
 Lis pendens. 6 
 
 BUDDICUai V. KIBK, 3 Cr. 893. 
 
 Depositions; objections to. a 
 
 a 10 P. 573, Dickens v. Beal. 
 a 12 P. 48, Bank U. S. v. Daniel. 
 a 12 P. 720. Rhode Island v, Mass. 
 a 92 U. S. 132, Phillips v. Payne. 
 6 96 U. S. 592, Ins. Co. v. Briuie. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 160, Shntte U.Thompson 
 a 21 WallT 35, Doane v. Glenn. 
 
 BitTBL,, VAN NESS v. See Van Ness v. Bael. 
 
 BUENA VISTA, BBOWN v. See IJrown v. Buena Vista. 
 
 BUFFINGTON v. HARVEY, 95 U. S. 99. 
 
 Bills of review, a I a 95 U. S. 397, Thompson v. Max- 
 
 I well. 
 
 BUFOBD, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Buford. 
 BUICK, SHERMAN V. See Sherman v. Buiolc. 
 BUM., CALDBR v. See Calder v. Bull. 
 BULL,, FRITZ v. See Fritz v. Bull. 
 BULLARD, CASTLE v. See Castle v. Bullard. 
 BULLARD, GILLETTE v. See Gillette v. Ballard. 
 BULLUS, MAUBAN v. See Mauran 1J. BuUns. 
 BUBCHAM, CREWS v. See Crews v. Burcham. 
 BURCHBLL v. MARSH, 17 H. 444. 
 
 Awards ; power of court ovei-. a | a IS H. 248, R. R. Co. v. Myers. 
 
 BUBDELL V. DENIG, 98 U. S. 716. 
 
 Patent law ; infringement ; dam- 1 a 93 U. S. 70, Birdsall v. Coolidge. 
 ages, a [ 
 
 BURDEN, CORNING v. See Corning v. Burden. 
 BURDETT, THE, U. S. v. See U. S, V. The Burdett. 
 BURFOBD, BX PARTE, 3 Cr. 448. 
 
 Snpreme Ct.; habeas corpus, a 
 
 BURGESS V. GRAY, 16 H. 48. 
 
 Land laws U. S.; when action of 
 executive officers final on facts, a 
 
 Legal title ; while in the govern- 
 ment the statute of limitations does 
 not run. 6 
 
 4 Cr. 75, ex parte Bolman. 
 3 P. 194, ex parte Watkins. 
 
 7 P. 568, ex parte Watkins. 
 
 5 H. 188, ex parte Metzger. 
 
 6 Wall. 324, exparte McCardle. 
 
 8 Wall. 98. CKjaarte Yerger. 
 a 18 Wall. 166, exparte Lange. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 343, exparte Virginia. 
 a 100 U. S. 374, exparte Siebokl. 
 
 a 18 H. 284, Murray v. Hoboken 
 Co. 
 
 6 92 U. S. 347, Oaksmith v. John- 
 son. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 47 
 
 BtJBGESS, GKEEIiET v. See Greeley v. Burgess. 
 BUKKE, NEW ALBANY v. See New Albany v. Burke. 
 BUKKE T. SMITH, 16 Wall. 390. 
 
 Corpriratioiis ; capital stock trust 1 a 17 Wall. 620, Sawyer v. Hoag. 
 for creditors, a \ 
 
 BUKKE, SWATZE v. See Sw.iyze v. Burke. 
 BTJBKHAM, 'WIGGINS v. See Wiggins v. Burkliam. 
 
 BUBKHAKDT, NATIONAI, BANK v. See National Bank v. Burkhardt. 
 BUKIINGTON, ROGERS v. See Rogers v. Bvrlington. 
 BUKNETT V. CALDW^Etl., 9 Wall. 390. 
 
 Vendor's lien, a | a 23 Wall. 127, Lewis v. Hawkins. 
 
 BURNETT, EWTNG v. See Ewlng v. Burnett. 
 BUBNHISEI. V. riRMAN, 83 WaU. 170. 
 
 Interest; nsnry. a 
 Biinkrnptc}' ; preferences. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 33, Farmers' Nat. B'k 
 
 V. Dearlng. 
 6 91 U. S. 121, Sawyer v. Turpin. 
 a 100 U. S. 74, Holden v. Trust Co. 
 
 BUBNXEY, COOK v. See Cook v. Burnley. 
 BURNXET, WHITE v. See White v. Burnley. 
 BURNS, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Bums. 
 BURR, EX PARTE, 9 'Wll. 530. 
 
 Mandamus; to restore attorney; 1 a 7 W.all. 377, ex parte Bradley, 
 discretionary powers, a I 
 
 BURR V. DES MOINES NAV. & R. R. CO., 1 Wall. 99. 
 
 Snpreme Court ; defective, state- 
 ment of facts ; dismissal of writ of 
 error, a 
 
 Jury trial ; waiver. 6 
 
 Grant by .Congress to Iowa of 
 lands on Des Moines River, c 
 
 BURR V. DURYEB, 1 WaU. 535. 
 
 Patent law; "equivalents." a 
 Combinations. 6 
 Patents for a machine; "inven- 
 tion." c 
 Keissues. d 
 
 a 1 Wall. 603, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 a 6 Wall. Ill, U. S. v. Adams. 
 a 9 Wall. 127, Norris v. Jackson. 
 a 9 Wall. 431, Flanders v. Tweed. 
 b 12 Wall. 281, Kearney v. Case. 
 a 12 Wall. 301, Miller v. L. Ins. Co. 
 c 17 Wall. 151, Williams v. Baker. 
 c 17 Wall. 162, Homestead Co. v. 
 Valley Co. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 328, Case u. Brown. 
 
 6 22 Wall. 27, Gill u. Wells. 
 
 c 94 U. S. 288, Fuller v. Yentzer. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 230. Werner v. Kino;. 
 
 d 98 D. 8. 139, Powder Co. v. Pow- 
 . der Co. 
 
 BURROWS, NUDD V. See Nudd v. Burrows. 
 BURT, MANDERTXLI/E v. See Manderrille v. Burt. 
 BURT V. PINJANB, 99 U. S. 180. 
 
 Jury; challenge, a \ a 99 U. S. 184, Atwood v. Weems. 
 
 BURTON T. SMITH, 13 P. 483. 
 
 Landlord-s liens, a | a 94 U. S. 387, Beall v. White. 
 
 BURTON V. WIXMAMS, 3 Wh. 539. 
 
 Boundaries between States, a | a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 BUKWEDL V. MANDEVILrB, 3 H. 573. 
 
 Executors; right to continue in- 1 a 101 U. S. 329, Smith v. Ayer. 
 terest in partnership, a I 
 
48 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BUSHNEIit V. KEITNEDY, 9 Wall. 387. 
 
 U. S. courts ; suits bj' assignees ; 
 sec. 11 judiciary act no application 
 to cases removed, a 
 
 a 14 Wall. 293, Lexington v. Butler 
 
 BUSSABD, WETZEtl, v. See Wetzell v. Bussard." 
 BUTtEB V. HORWIXZ, 7 Wall. 859. 
 
 Constitution; legal-tender acts; 
 contract to pay in gold, a 
 
 a 8 Wall. 445, Bronson ». Kirap on 
 a 8 Wall. 606, Hepburn v. Grisirold 
 a 11 Wall. 380, Dewing v. Sears. 
 
 BUTLER, I/EXINGTON v. See Lexington v. Butler. 
 BUTtEB V. PENTTSYIVANIA, 10 H. 414. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 559, Newton v. Com'rs. 
 
 Constitntion ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; power of the legislature 
 over offices, a 
 
 BUTLER CO., CURTIS t. See Curtis v. Butler Co. 
 
 BUTXERirrEXD V. USHER, 91 U. S. 346. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees ; I a 96 TJ. S. 714, Sage v. Kailr'd Co. 
 decree confirming sale, a \ 
 
 BUTTERWORTH, BENNETT v. See Bennett v. Butterwortli. 
 BUTTS, HODGSON v. See Hodgson v. Butts. 
 BUTZ T. MUSCATINE, 8 Wall. 575. 
 
 U. S. courts; mandamus to State 
 officers to compel levy of tax. a 
 
 When the deci.sions of the State 
 courts biiuling; county and muni- 
 cipal bonds in aid of railroads. 6 
 
 Limitation on power to contract 
 debts without providing for pay- 
 ment, c 
 
 Legislative control over muni- 
 cipal corponitions. d 
 
 BUYCK V. U. S., IS P. ai5. 
 
 Floriila land titles, a 
 Incomplete claims, b 
 Want of survey, c 
 
 9 Wall. 414, Mayor v. Loi-d. 
 
 18 Wall. 82, Supervisors w.U.S. 
 
 19 Wall. 678, Pine Grove c.Tal- 
 cott. 
 
 94 U. S. 642, Com'rs v. Tiiayer. 
 
 98 U. S. 397, U. S. e. N. Orleans 
 
 99 U. S. 628. Com'rs v. Sellew. 
 d 100 U. S. 532; Mt. Pleasant v. 
 
 Beckwith. 
 
 a 16 P. 155, U. S. V. Miranda. 
 
 a 3 H. 618, Chaires v. U. S. 
 
 6 3 H. 784, U. S. V. King. 
 
 a 5 H. 26, U. S. v. Lawton. 
 
 e 10 H. 554, Villabolos v. U. S. 
 
 6 11 H. 124, Le Compte v. U. S. 
 BYNUM, OLCOTT v. See Olcott v. Bynum. 
 BYRNE, INNERABITY v. See Innerarity v. Byrne. 
 CABOT, BINGHAM v. See Bingham v. Oabot. 
 CADLE V. BAKER, ao Wall. 650. 
 
 Corporations; proceedings to en- 
 force liability of stockholdei-s of 
 insolvent bank, a 
 
 CADY, STEVENS v. See Stevens v. Oady. 
 CAIG, DUVAIi T. See Buval v. Caig. 
 CAIG, SHIRRAS T. See Sliirras v. Caig. 
 CAI.DCLEUGH, GORDON t. See Gordon «. Oaldoleugh. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 59, Sanger v. XJpton. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 49 
 
 CAUJER T. BTJIX, 3 DaU. 386. 
 
 Retrospective laws ; when valid ; 
 what are ex post facto laws, a 
 
 Constitntion ; eleventh amend- 
 ment ; suits between States and 
 individuals. 6 
 
 Obli^tion of contractR ; validity 
 of act awarding new trials, c 
 
 Judument without hearing void, d 
 
 What are vested rights, e 
 
 CAIDEB-WOOB, N. T. & VA. S. B. CO. 
 
 Co. V. Calderwood. 
 
 CAXDWEU-'S CASE, 19 "WaU. 264, 
 
 United States ; contracts for mil- I a 91 U. S. 26! 
 itary stores, a I 
 
 CA1I>\FEIJ^ BUBNETT v. See Bnmett v. OaldweU. 
 
 CAIOJWEIi V. TAGGABT, 4 P. 190. 
 
 a 2 P. 653, Wilkinson v. Leland. 
 a 8 r. 108, W^itson v. Mei-cc'r. 
 6 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 c 10 H. 396, R. R. Co. o. Nesbit. 
 a 17 H. 461, Carpenter ». Penn. 
 a 4 Wall. 173, Locke v. New Or- 
 leans. 
 d 11 Wall. 267, McVeigh v. U. S. 
 a 13 Wall. 662. Osborii u. Nicholson 
 e 15 Wall. 623, Gunn v. Barry. 
 a 23 Wall. 149, Randell v. Kreiger. 
 
 V. See New York & Virginia S. U. 
 
 Black V. U. S. 
 
 Parties, a 
 CAXD'WEI.L V. TJ. S., 8 H. 381. 
 
 U. S. ; forfeitures ; at what time 
 they attach, a 
 Instructions; exceptions. 6 
 
 as 13 P. 359, Story c, Livingston. 
 1 a 16 Wall. 451, Ribon v. R. R. Co. 
 
 a 14 WaU. 56, Henderson's Dis- 
 tilled Spirits. 
 6 20 Wall. 162, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 
 CAirFOENIA, AXMT v. See Almy v. OaliJomia. 
 CAILAWAT CO. v. FOSTER, 93 V. S: 567. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads ; conditions ; valid- 
 ity of subscription, a 
 
 How agreement for subscription 
 affected by adoption of new Consti- 
 tution, b 
 
 Elections ; two-thirds vote, c 
 
 a 94 U, S. 638, Com'rs v. Thayer. 
 
 6 94 U. S. 689, Scotland Co. o. 
 Thomas. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 806, East Lincoln v. 
 Davenport. 
 
 b 96 U. S. 685, Ray Co. v. Van 
 Syole. 
 
 b 98 U. S. 172, SchuylerD.Thomas 
 
 c 99 U. S. 220, Sup. v. Galbraith. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 202, Pompton v. Coop- 
 er Union. 
 
 CAMANCHE, THE, 8 "WaU. 470. 
 
 Salvage ; in whose name libel I 
 should be filed, a \ 
 
 CAMBUSTON, V. S. v. See V. S. v. Cambnston. 
 CAaiDBN T. DOREMUS, 3 H. 516. 
 
 Negotiable paper; regularity of 
 notice and protest a question of 
 law for the court, a 
 
 Exception ; to admission of evi- 
 dence, b 
 
 Supreme Court ; objections must 
 first be taken in court below, c 
 
 CAMMEYEB V. NEWTON, 94 U. S. 885. 
 
 Patent law; presumption tiiat I a 94 U. S. 293, Fuller ». Tentzer. 
 patentee is the first inventor, a \ 
 4 
 
 a 10 Wall. 11, The Blackwell. 
 a 101 U. S. 390, The Sabine. 
 
 a 18 H. 517, Watson v. Tarpley. 
 a 20 Wall. 13;^, Burton v. Driggs. 
 c 20 Wall. 418, Mays v. Fritton. 
 
50 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 CAMORON V. McROBBKTS, 3 Wh. 591. 
 
 U.S. courts; jurisdiction; citi- 
 zpnsliip. a 
 
 Judgments; power to set aside 
 after term. 6 
 
 Paities. c 
 
 Eesjndicata. d 
 
 a 7 P. 252, Vattier v. Hinde. 
 
 6 12 P. 491, ex parte Sibbald. 
 
 6 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 
 c 17 H. 137, Siiilds v. Barrow. 
 
 6 18 H. .508, McMicken v. Perrin. 
 
 c 6 Wall. 285, Barney v. Balti- 
 more. 
 
 d22 Wall. 245, French v. Hay. 
 CAMPAU, LEWIS v. See Lewis v. Oampau. 
 CAMPBELL V. BOYREATJ, !S1 H. 383. 
 
 U.S. courts; trial without jnry. a 
 Waiver. 6. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 429, Flanders v. 'J'weed. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 281, Kearney v. Case. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 53, Henderson's Spirits 
 
 6 91 U. S. 614, Gilman v. Tel. Co. 
 CAMPBELL, GENEKES v. See Generes v. Campbell. 
 CAMPBELL, NEBRASKA v. See Nebraska v. Campbell. 
 CAMPBELL V. PRATT, a P. 354. 
 
 Erior ; immaterial assignment I 10 Wall. 528, Brobst v. Brock, 
 of. a I 
 
 CAMPBELL, ROBINSON v. See Eobinson v. Campbell. 
 CAMPBELL, VANCE v. See Vance v. Campbell. 
 CAMPBELL V. WILCOX, 10 W^all. 428. 
 
 Negotiable paper; validity ; I al4 Wall. 374, Pughc.McOormick. 
 
 stamps, a \ 
 
 CAMPBELL, WISWALL v. See Wiswall v. Campbell. 
 CANAL CO. V. CLABK, 13 TVall. 380. 
 
 Trade-marks. «. i a 96 U. S. 254, McLean v. Fleming. 
 
 I a 101 U. S. 54, M'f'gCo. v. Trainer. 
 
 CANAL CO. V. GORDON, 6 Wall. 661. 
 
 Mechanic's lien, a ' | a 101 U. S.452, Brooks w. R. K. Co. 
 
 CANNON V. NEW ORLEANS, 80 Wall. 677. 
 
 Constitution ; tonnage tax. 
 Wharfage, h 
 
 a 94 U. S. 245, S. S. Co. ». Tinker. 
 a 99 U. S. 284, Tr.Co.D.WIieeliiig 
 6 100 U. S. 428, Packet Co. v. St. 
 Louis. 
 
 CANTER V. AMERICAN INS. CO., 3 P. 318. 
 
 Supreme Court; error; generally 
 an appellant only can ask reversal, a 
 
 No appeal lies from a decree re- 
 specting costs. 6- 
 
 CANTER, AMERICAN INS. CO. v 
 CANTRELL, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Cantrell 
 CAPRON V. VAN ORDEN, 8 Cr. 186. 
 
 a 5 Wall . 41 2, The Wm . Bagaley. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 13.5, Mail Co. v. Flan- 
 ders. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 599, The Step. Morgan. 
 
 6 100 U. S. 112, Elastic Fabrics 
 
 Co. V. Smith. 
 See Am. Ins. Co. v. Canter. 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship; juris- 
 diction, a 
 
 When judgments are void. 6 
 CARD, MAGUIRE v. See Maguire i>. Card. 
 CAREY, PERIN V. See Perin v. Carey. 
 
 See Nelson v. Garland; 
 
 a 8 P. 115, Brown v. Keene. 
 6 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 a 19 H. 402. Dred Scott v. Sanford. 
 
 CARLAND, NELSON v. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 51 
 
 CAKLIStE V. TJ. S., 16 Wall. 151. 
 
 Pardon, a 
 
 l^euti-als residing witliin the 
 enemy's country ; duties of. 6 
 Court of Claims; suits by aliens, c 
 
 a 91 U, S. 47S. Osborn v. U. S. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 153, Knote v. U. S. 
 
 6 95 U. S. 212, Kadicli v. Hutchins. 
 
 c 97 U. S. 62, Young v. U. S. 
 
 c 99 (J. S. 307, Phelps w. McDonald 
 
 a 17 H. 137. Shields v. Barrow. 
 6 7 Wall. 110, Dnrant U.Essex, 
 c 100 U. S. 489, Hauenstein v. 
 Lynham. 
 
 CAKNEAT T. BANKS, 10 Wh. 188 
 
 Parties ; when formal, a 
 
 Equity; dismissals without prej- 
 udice. 6 
 
 Treaties; alienage, c 
 CARNEAX, BANK V. S. v. See Bank U. S. v. Carneal, 
 CARNOCHAN t. CHRISTIE, 11 Wh. 446. 
 
 Awards, a a 2 Wall. 131. Heckers v. Fowler. 
 
 Cross-bills. 6 a 5 Wall. 430, De Groot v. U. S, 
 
 b 10 Wall. 303, Washington R. R. 
 Co. V. Bradleys. 
 
 CAKOIiTNE, THE, t. TJTiTITED STATES, 7 Cr. 496. 
 
 Admiralty; Circuit Court; when 
 it may allow new allegation in an 
 information, a 
 
 Informations ; nature of. b 
 
 Slave trade ; construction of acts 
 prohibiting, c 
 
 Supreme Court ; amendments 
 and further proof, d 
 
 Reversal wliere court below was 
 without jurisdiction, e 
 
 CAKONDEIET v. ST. LOUIS, 1 Bl. 
 
 Missouri land titles ; right of Ca- 
 rondelet to commons, a t 
 
 CARPENTER v. BBXTER, 8 TVall. S13. 
 
 a 1 Wh. 264, The Edward. 
 6 9Wh. 384, The Emily and Car- 
 oline, 
 ■c 9 Wh. 409, St. Jago do Cuba. 
 c 10 Wh. 135, The Plattsbnrgh. 
 c 12 Wh. 467, U. S. v. Gooding, 
 c 2 Wall. 371, The Slavers (Sarah). 
 b 5 Wall. 68, U. S. «. Weed. 
 d 10 Wall. 420. The Mabey. 
 6 16 Wall. 431, U. S. v. Huckabee. 
 c 20 Wall. 105, Confiscation Cases. 
 e 23 Wall. 164, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 6 95 U. S. 586, U. S. v. Mann. 
 b 96 U. S. 365, U. S. v. Simmons. 
 
 179. 
 
 I a 14 Wall. 813, Dent v. Emraerger. 
 
 Deeds ; acknowledgment, a 
 
 CARPENTER v. lONGAN, 16 Wall, 
 
 Negotiable paper ; mortgage to 
 secure ; what defenses are good 
 against ; bona-fide holders, a 
 
 CARPENTER V. PROVIDENCE INS, 
 
 Insurance; concealment, a 
 
 Evidence by executors. 6 
 
 Mortgagors ; equities arising out 
 of the receipt by apparent owner of 
 the insurance-money, c 
 
 U. S. courts; when they follow 
 the decisions of the State courts, d 
 
 CARPENTER v. RANNEIS, 19 Wall. 138. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 32, Little v. Herndon. 
 
 371. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 469, Kennicott v. Super- 
 visors. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 166, Sawyer v. Prickett. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 18, New Orleans v. 
 Montgomery. 
 
 CO., 16 p. 495. 
 
 a 4 H. 216, Carpenter v. Provi- 
 dence Ins. Co. 
 6 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 c 12 H. 145, Rus.sell v. Southard. 
 d 100 U. S. 246, Gates v. Nat. Bank 
 dlOl U. S. 31, R. R. Co. V. Nat. 
 Bank. 
 
 Land titles ; Missouri ; confirma- 
 tions by Congress ; enurement ; 
 legal representatives, a 
 
 a 22 Wall. 262. Connoyeru. Schaef- 
 fer. . 
 
52 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COIHIT DECISIONS. 
 
 CARPENTER, WOOD v. See Wood v. Carpenter. 
 CABB, U. S. V. See U. S. o. Carr. 
 CABBINGTON, CtABK v. See Clark v. Carrington. 
 CAEBINOXON v. MEECHANTS' INS. CO., 8 P. 518. 
 
 Prize ; neutrals ; trade in time 
 oi war; contraband, a 
 Probable cause. & 
 
 CABBINGTON v. PBATT, 18 H. 
 
 Special verdicts ; mistrial, a 
 Bottomry bonds. 6 
 
 63. 
 
 CABBOM,, THE, 8 Wall. 303. 
 
 Collision ; rules of navigation, 
 
 a 3 Wall. 556, The Bermuda. 
 a 5 Wall. 26, The Spiribrook. 
 6 97 U. S. 643, Stacey v. Emery. 
 
 a 20 H. 441, Suydam v. Williamson. 
 6 9 Wall. 135, The Grapeshot. 
 a 23 Wall. 163, Stickney v. Wilt, 
 a 91 U. S. 131, E.R. o. Trustees. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 592, The Potomac. 
 a 15 Wall. 679, The Lucille. 
 a 94 U. S. 604, The Steph. Morgan 
 See McKinney v. Carroll. , 
 
 CABBOIili, McKINNEY v. 
 CABBOIil. V. PEAKE, 1 P. 83. 
 
 Writs of error to State courts; 
 judgment on Federal question will 
 not be reversed unless manifestly 
 wrong, a 
 
 Amendments. 6 
 
 CABEOtl., PEATT v. See Pratt v. Carroll. 
 CAEEOLl T. SAFEOBD, 3 H. 4S9. 
 
 Land laws ; right to the fee ; 
 register's certificate, a 
 
 Patents. 6 
 
 State tax on public land before 
 issue of patent, c 
 
 CABEOM., STEIXE v. See Stelle v. Carroll. 
 
 CAEBOM, V. U. S., 13 WaU. 152. 
 
 Court of Claims ; captured and i a 95 U. S. 417, U. S. v. Gillis 
 abandoned property act. a \ , . ". v^ima, 
 
 CAEB-Sl, TATLOR t. See Taylor v. Carry]. 
 CABSKAEDEN, PIERCE ^r. See Piercer. Carskarden. 
 CAESON, JENNINGS v. See Jennings „. Carson. 
 CAESON, BOBEETSON v. See Robertson v. Carson. 
 CAESON, THOENTON v. See Thornton r. Oarson. 
 CABTEE V. CUTTING, 8 Cr. 851 
 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 6 11 H. 490, Conrad v. Griflfey. 
 
 a 4 H. 19, Levi v. Thompson. 
 6 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 c 4 Wall. 219, Witherspoon v. Dun- 
 can. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appellate juris- 
 diction in cases from courts of the 
 District of Columbia, a 
 
 CARTER, AYRES v. See Ayres v. Carver, 
 CARTER, RYAN v. See Ryan n. Carter. 
 CARVER V. HYDE, 16 P, 613. 
 
 Patents; combinations, a 
 "Equivalents." b 
 
 a 19 Wall. 64, E. R. Co. v. Church. 
 
 a 10 H. 341, Stimpson v. R. R. Co. 
 15 Wall. 194, Gould v. Rees. 
 a 22 Wall. 28, Gill v. Wells. 
 a 23 Wall. 367, Reedy ii. Scott. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 53 
 
 CAB\'ER V. JACKSON, 4 P. 80. 
 
 Supreme Couit; enor ; instnic- 
 tions. a 
 
 Recital in lease ; when after lapse 
 of time evidence to establish lease, b 
 
 Prima-facie evidence, c 
 
 Recitals ; when estoppels, d 
 
 Deed ; covenants of title ; estop- 
 pels, e 
 
 Wills; estates held to vest "at 
 earliest possible period;" contin- 
 gent remainders, f 
 
 Deeds ; evidence of delivery, g 
 
 CAJBT V. CURTIS, 3 H. !836. 
 
 Collectors ; action against to re 
 cover back taxes ; protest, a 
 
 Judicial power of the U. S.; pow 
 ers of Congress. 6 
 
 a 5 P. 190, ex parte Crane. 
 
 6 6 P. 598, Crane v. Morris. 
 
 c 6 P. 622, Kelly v. Jackson. 
 
 o 7 P. 389, Majfniac v. Thompson. 
 
 d 10 P. 257, Sprigg v. Bank. 
 
 a 4 H. 123, Garrard «. Reynolds. 
 
 « 11 H. 323, Van Rensselaer r. 
 
 Kearney, 
 e 18 H. 83, Bush v. Cooper. 
 6 5 Wall. 806, Deery u. Cray. 
 f 6 Willi. 475, Doe v. Consedine. 
 g 10 Wall. 866, Hanriok v. Neeley. 
 /19 Wall. 175, Cropley ». Cooper. 
 a 99 U. S. 659, Spring Co. «. Edgar 
 
 a 4 H. 331, Rankin v. Hoyt. 
 
 6 8 H. 449, Sheldon v. Sill. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 478, Curtis v. Fiedler. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 732, Phila. v. Collector. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 129, Nichols v. U. S. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 13, Col'tor v. Hubbard. 
 
 b 18 Wall. 577, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 639, Bailey v. R. R. Co. 
 
 a 92 Wall. 452, Barney v. Watson. 
 
 a 96 Wall. 150, Davies v. Arthur. 
 CASANOVA, BOMIE v. See Eomie v. Casanova. 
 CASE V. BBO'WN, a ■WaU. 320. 
 
 ■ Patent law; infringement; com- | a 22 Wall. 27, Gill u. Wells, 
 binations. a I 
 
 CASE, KEABNET v. See Kearney d. Case. 
 CASE v. TEBBEll, 11 Wall. 301. 
 
 National banks; power of comp- I a 14 Wall. 400, Bank of Bethel r. 
 troller; right to sue. a \ Pahquioque B'k. 
 
 CASEY, BABNITZ v. See Bamitz v. Casey. 
 CASET V. CAVABOC, 96 V. S. 467. 
 
 Pledge of securities, a | a 96 U. S. 492, Casey v. Nat. Bank. 
 
 CASEY V. GAltl, 94 U. S. 673. 
 
 National banks ; assessments i a 102 U. S. 426, U. S. u. Knox, 
 against stockholders, a \ 
 
 CASKS OF SIJGAB, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Casks of Sugar. 
 CASKS OF WINE, TJ. S. v. See U. S. i). Casks of Wine. 
 CASS CO. V. JOHNSTON, 95 TJ. S. 390. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads; conditions; re- 
 citals ; estoppel ; bona-fide holders ; 
 Missouri township aid act. a 
 
 Mandamus by U. S. courts to 
 compel levy of tax to pay judg- 
 ment, b 
 CASSIUS, THE, 3 Dall. 181. 
 
 Admiralty; jurisdiction over ves- 
 sels property of foreign nations or 
 sovereigns, a 
 
 Captures in violation of neu- 
 trality. 6 
 
 U. S. 102, Daviess Co. v. 
 Huidekoper. 
 
 6 98 U. S. 398, U. S. u. New Or- 
 leans. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 679, Douglass v. Pike. 
 
 a 1 Wh. 252, L'Invincible. 
 6 7 Wh. 334, The Santissima Trini- 
 dad. 
 
54 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPEBMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 CASTANT, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Oastant. 
 CASTrtliEBO, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Castillero. 
 CASTLE T. BXILI.ARD, 83 H. 173. 
 
 Evidence; fraud; when evidence 
 of like oflTenses relevatit. a 
 Instructions to the jury, b 
 Circumstantial evidence, c 
 Nonsuits, d 
 
 a 7 Wall. 139, Lincoln v. Claflin. 
 a 13 Wall. 465, Butler v. Watkins. 
 6 16 Wall. 516, Tweed's Case, 
 c 16 Wall. 602, Wager v. Hall. 
 d 18 Wall. 250, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 6 99 U. S. 659, Spring Co. v. Edgar 
 
 CASTBO V. GOMEZ, 3 Wall. 47. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error 
 and appeal ; return day and dock- 
 eting, a 
 
 CASTKO V. HENDRICKS, as H. 438 
 
 Land laws; decrees in' favor of I 
 '•legal representatives." a \ 
 
 CASTBO v. U. S., 3 WaU. 49. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals ; allow- 
 ance ; return of i-ecord ; docket- 
 ing, a 
 
 Difference between appeals and 
 writs of error. 6 
 
 CASTRO, U. S. T. See U. S. ■!). Castro. 
 
 CASWEMi, liAWBENCE v. See La-wrence v. Caswell, 
 
 CATHCAET V. EOBINSON, 5 P. 380. 
 
 British statutes ; adoption of. a 
 
 Construction of words in the con- 
 stitution taken from English law. 6 
 
 Equity ; parol evidence ; mis- 
 take, c 
 
 CATHERINE, THE, v. DICKINSON, 17 H 
 
 a 99 U. S. 506, Grigsby ». Purcell. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 208, McMicken v. XJ. S. 
 
 o 3 Wall. 768, U. S. v. Gomez. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 824, Alviso v. U. S. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 358, Mussina u.Cavazos. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 310, Edmonson v. 
 Bloom shire. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 309, The Lucy. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 425, U. S. v. Vigil. 
 
 6 20 Wall. 625, Murdock v. Mem- 
 phis. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 506, Grigsby v. Purcell. 
 
 a 12 P. 608, Kendall v. IT. S. 
 
 6 18 H. 308, ex parte Wells. 
 
 c 101 U. S. 585, Walden v. Skinner. 
 
 Collision ; when each ship bears 
 its own loss, a 
 Damages. 6 
 Lookouts, u 
 
 CATtETT V. BRODIB, 9 Wli. 553. 
 
 Supreme Ct.; act of 1803 places 
 appeals on same footing as writs of 
 error; supersedeas, a 
 
 Approval of bond. 6 
 
 173. 
 
 a 21 H. 194, The James Gray t). The 
 
 John Eraser. 
 6 8 Wall. 386, The Baltimore. 
 a 12 Wall. 43, The Maria Martin. 
 a 14 Wall. 361, The Continental. 
 6 18 Wall. 55, The Sapphire. 
 a 91 U. S. 215, The Sunnyside. 
 c 91 U. S. 699, The Colorado. 
 a 92 U. S. 438, The America. 
 a 93 U. S. 319, The Atlas. 
 
 a 16 H. 139, Stafford v. Union B'k. 
 a 23 H. 1, Anson v. R. R. Co. 
 a 3 Wall. 701, U. S. v. Dashiel. 
 6 4 Wall. 454, Davidson v. Lanier. 
 a 12 Wall. 99, French v. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 a 12 Wall. 149, Bigler v. Waller. 
 a 21 Wall. 29, Jerome D.McCarter 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 55 
 
 CATIiETT, COIUMBIA INS. CO. v. See Columbia Ins. Co. v. Oatlett. 
 CATTS V. PHAIEN, 3 H. 388. 
 
 Instniotions to jury, a \ alo Wall. 674, Haffin v. Mason 
 
 CAVAROC, CASEY v. See Casey 11. CaTaroo. 
 CAVAZOS, MUSSINA v. See Mussina v. Oayazos. 
 CAVAZOS V. TREVINO, 6 WaU. 773. 
 
 Evidence; "snn-oundingfaots." a 
 
 CAWOOD PATENT, 94 V. S. 695. 
 
 Patent law ; damages tor in- 
 fringement ; profits, a 
 
 CAYUGA, THE, 14 Wall. 878. 
 
 Demurrage, o 
 Collision ; tugs. & 
 
 CAZE & RICHAUD v. BAIXIMOKE INS. CO., 7 Cr. 358. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 95, Grood v. Martin. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 139, Elizabeth v. Pave- 
 ment Co. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 603, Tlie Favorita. 
 6 94 U. S. 497, I'lie Margaret. 
 
 a 8 Cr. 46, Marcardieru.Ins. Co. 
 a 12 Wb. 383, Ins. Co. v. Catlett. 
 
 Marine insurance ; abandon- 
 ment ; liability of underwi'iters for 
 freight, a 
 
 CENTKAX R. R. CO., SAGE v. See Sage v. Central E. R. Co. 
 CENTRA!, R. R.," YORK CO. v. See York Co. v. Central E. E. 
 CENTRAX RAXLROAIt AND BANK CO. T. GEORGIA, 98 U. S. 665 
 
 a 94 U. S. 726, Ches. E. R. Co. v.. 
 
 Virginia. 
 a 96 U. S. 511, R. E. Co. o. Maine, 
 a 98 U. S. 362, E.E. Co. U.Georgia. 
 
 CHAFFEE T. BOSTON BEXTING CO., 88 H. 883. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; exemption of railroads from 
 taxation; consolidation, a 
 
 Patent law ; purchase for mak- 
 ing and vending article patented, 
 and purchase for the purpose of 
 using it. a 
 
 Assignees. 6. 
 
 CHAFFEE V. HAYWOOD, 80 H. 814. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 CHAFFEE V. U. S., 18 WaU. 516. 
 
 Eevenne ; action to recover pen- 
 alties. ' a 
 
 CHATRES T. U. S., 3 H. 618. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandates, a 
 
 CHAMBERLAIN, DE XA CROIX v. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 351, Bloomer v. Millin- 
 
 gar. 
 a 16 Wall. 547, Mitchell v. Hawley. 
 6 IS Wall. 416, Eunson v. Dodge. 
 
 a 20 Wall. S, Habich v. Folger. 
 a 97 U. S. 271, Lilienthal's Tobacco. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 283, Tyler v. Magvvire. 
 See De La Croix v. Chamberlain. 
 
 CHAMBERLAIN v. W^ARD, 81 H. 570. 
 
 Collision ; lookouts, a 
 
 Lights. 6 
 
 Cross-libels in admiralty, 
 
 CHAMBERLAIN, WARD v. 
 CHAMBERS, KENNBTT v. 
 
 a 22 H. 471, N. Y. & B. Tr. Co. v. 
 
 P. & S. St. N. Co. 
 a 23 H. 293, Haney v. Bait. S. P. Co 
 a 3 Wall. 273, Tlie Ottowa. 
 6 9 Wall. 510, The Gray Eagle. 
 a 13 Wall. 479, The Ariadne. 
 6 14 Wall. 358, The Continental. 
 6 91 U. S. 214, The Sunnyside. 
 c 91 U. S. 383, The Dore. 
 6 91 U. S. 698, The Colorado. 
 
 See Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 SeeKennett v. Chambers. 
 
56 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 CHAMBERS, STODDARD v. See Stoddard v. Chambers. 
 CHAUDtER T. VAIf ROKDER, 84 H. 834. 
 
 Iiistriiotioiis; province of jury, a | a 20 Wall. 162, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 CHAPMAN, BRENT v. See Brent v. Chapman. 
 CHAJPMAN, FENWICK v. See Fenwick v. Chapman: 
 CHAPMAN V. FORSYTH, 2 H. 808. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; what debts ex- I a 95 U. S. 708, Neal v. Clark, 
 empted from discharge; "fraud." ffi| 
 CHAPMAN, McCARGO v. See McOargo v. Chapman. 
 CHAPMAN, ROACH v. See Roach v. Chapman. 
 CHAPMAN, 'WOL.SEY V. See "Wolsey v. Chapman. 
 CHAPPEDELAINE v. DECHENAUX, 4 Cr. 306. 
 
 Circnit Courts U. S. ; suits by ad- 
 nministrators ; citizenship, a 
 
 a 8 Wh. 642, Childress v. Emory. 
 
 a 12 P. 164, Clarke v. Matliewson 
 
 a 2 H. 13, McNutt v. Bland. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 391, Bushnell v. Ken- 
 nedy. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 175, Coal Co. v. Blatch- 
 ford. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 67, Eice v. Houston. 
 CHARI:ES carter, the, BtAINE V. See Blaine v. The Charles Carter. 
 GHARI.es river bridge v. warren BRIDGB, 11 p. 536. 
 
 Corporations ; implied powers ; 
 obligation of contracts under the 
 Constitution ; power to authorize a 
 bridge near that allowed by the 
 charter of the corporation, a 
 
 Public grants ; construction in 
 favor of government. 6 
 
 Ferries ; police power, c 
 
 Power of State legislature to 
 bind tlie State by contract, d 
 
 Ex post facto laws, e 
 
 Statutes of U. S. ; construed by 
 the rules of the common law. f 
 
 Piivate and curative statutes, g 
 
 a 6 H. 318, Plant. Bank v. Sharp. 
 
 6 8 H. 579, Mills v. St. Clair Co. 
 
 b 9 H. 177, Peri-ine v. Canal Co. 
 
 b 10 H. 414, Butler v. Pennsylv'a. 
 
 c 10 H. 532, E. Hartford v. Hart- 
 ford Bridge Co. 
 
 b 13 H. 78, R. K. Co. ». B. R. Co. 
 
 6 16 H. 376, B'k of Ohio v. Knoop. 
 
 d 16 H. 427, Life Ins. Co. v. Debolt 
 
 e 17 H. 461, Carpenter v. Penn. 
 
 6 23 H. 88, K. R. v. Litclifleld. 
 
 c 23 H. 437, Mintuin v. Larue. 
 
 / 1 Bl. 375, Rice v. Railroad Co. 
 
 d 1 Bl. 442, Jeffeison Branch B'k 
 V. Skelly. 
 
 b S Wall. 75, Biughamton Br. 
 
 g 7 Wall. 624, Beloit v. Moi-gan. 
 
 b 15 M'all. 512, Holyoke Co. v. 
 Lyman. 
 
 6 92 U. S. 741, R. R. w. U. S. 
 
 6 100 U. S. .561, Kewtoiiu.Com'rs. 
 
 /lOl U. S. 540, R. R. Co. i;. Phila. 
 CHARLESTON, BRANCH v. See Branch v. Charleston. 
 CHARLESTON, MURRAY v. See Mnrray v. Charleston 
 CHARLESTON, WESTON T. See Weston v. Charleston. 
 
 CHARMING BETSY, THE, MURRAY T. See Mnrray -». The Charming Betsy. 
 CHASE, BOWBN v. See Bowen v. Chase. 
 CHASE, INS. CO. V. See Ine. Co. v. Chase. 
 CHASE, STEAMBOAT CO. v. See Steamboat Co. v. Chase. 
 CHASE V. VASQUBZ, 11 Wli. 489. 
 
 Supreme Ct.; final judgments. a\a 3 P. 316, Canter u. Am. Ins. Co. 
 
 I a 15 H. 464, Corning v. Factory. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 57 
 
 CHEANG-KETE v. U. S., 3 Wall. 380, 
 
 Judgments ; control of courts 
 over during the term, a 
 
 Legal-tender; payments of du- 
 ties. 5 
 
 Power to amend judgment after 
 writ of error to Supreme Court, c 
 
 CHEATHAM v. V. S., 93 V. S. 86. 
 
 Taxation ; remedies' for testing 
 invalidity of tax. a | 
 
 CHEEK, OVEKTON V. See Overton v. Cheek. 
 CHEROKEE TOBACCO, THE, 11 WaU. 619. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 40, Basset v. V. S. 
 6 12 Wall. 697, Trebilcock v. Wil- 
 son . 
 c 21 Wall. 552, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 614, State Railroad Tax 
 Cases. 
 
 Indians ; to what laws subject, a 
 Statutes; construction. 6 
 Treaties; law of the land, c 
 
 a 18 Wall. 87, Stuart v. U. S. 
 6 92 U. S. 621, Lewis v. U. S. 
 c 100 U. S. 490, Haiienstein wLyn- 
 ham. 
 
 CHEROKEE NATION v. GEORGIA, 6 P. 1 
 
 Indians; right to the lands occu- 
 pied by them, a 
 
 Jurisdiction of Supreme Court to 
 pronounce on political questions. 6 
 
 Control over the Indians by U. 
 S. Government, c 
 
 CHESAPEAKE INS. CO. 
 CHESAPEAKE INS. CO., 
 CHESAPEAKE INS. CO., 
 CHESAPEAKE INS. CO. 
 
 a 9 P. 725, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 
 & 5 H. 374, Scott V. Jones. 
 
 c 3 Wall. 420, U. S. v. Holliday. 
 
 6 6 Wall. 73, Georgia v. Stanton. 
 
 c 11 Wall. 619, Cherokee Tobacco. 
 
 c 17 Wall. 237, Hoklen v. Joy. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 593, U. S. v. Cook. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 743, Railroad v. U. S. 
 
 c 98 U. S. 193, U. S. V. 43 Gallons. 
 BIAYS V. See Biays v. Chesapeake Ins. Co. 
 BUCK V. See Buck v. Chesapeake Ins. Co. 
 MABCABDIEB v. See Marcardier v. Ches. Ins. Co. 
 V. STAKK, 6 Cr. 278. 
 
 insurance ; abandon- 
 
 a 4 P. 141, Ins. Co. v. Ashby. 
 6 8 H. 483, Prentice v. Zane. 
 
 Marine 
 ment. a 
 
 Special verdicts, h 
 CHESAPEAKE INS. CO., STARK T. See Stark v. Ches.apeake Ins. Co. 
 CHESAPEAKE R. R. v. VIBGINIA, 94 V. S. 719. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- a 96 U. S. 511, E. R. Co. ». Maine, 
 tracts ; exemption of railroad from 
 taxation ; consolidation, a 
 
 CHESAPEAKE ANB OHIO CANAL v. KNAPP, 9 P. 567. 
 
 Jury; province of as to the evi- a 95 U. S. 238, Ins. Co. u. Rodel. 
 dence. o a 3 H. 71, Walker jj. Bank. 
 
 o 10 P. 93, Tracy «. Swartout. 
 CHES. & OHIO R. B. CO., PERRINE v. See Perrine v. Ches. & Ohio R. E. Co. 
 CHEW, GAINES v. See G-aines i). Chew. 
 CHEW, GIBSON V. See Gibson v. Chew. 
 CHEW, JACKSON T. See Jackson v. Chew. 
 CHEW, MARTIN v. See Martin v. Chew. 
 CHICAGO, AYRES t. See Ayres v. Chicago. 
 CHICAGO, DOWS V. See Dows i). Chicago. 
 CHICAGO, DUCAT v. See Ducat v. Chicago. 
 CHICAGO v. ROBBINS, 2 Bl. 4»8. 
 
 U. S. courts; when bound by the I a 91 U. S. 453, Townsend v. Todd, 
 decisions of the State courts, a > 
 
58 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 CHICAGO, BOBBINS v. See Eobbins 11. Chicago. 
 CHICAGO, U. S. V. See U. S. o. Chicago. 
 CHICAGO RAILWAT v. IOWA, 94 U. S. 165. 
 
 Kailroads ; how far subject to 
 legislative control, a 
 
 a 94 U. S. 176, Peik v. Chicago R. 
 a 94 U. S. 179, B. B. v. Iowa. 
 a 94 U. S. 180, B. B. v. Blake. 
 a 95 U. S. 488, Hall v. De Cuir. 
 a 99 [J. S. 719, Sinking-Fund Cases 
 
 CHILD, TBIST V. See Trist v. Child. 
 CHILD, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Child. 
 CHIXDBESS, DOE v. See Doe v. Childress. 
 CHIXDBESS V. EMORY, 8 Wh. 643. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; citi- 
 
 zenship of administrator, a 
 Title of administrator ; 
 shown. 6 
 
 how 
 
 a 12 P. 164, Clarke v. Mathewson. 
 h 13 P. 38, Kane ». Paul, 
 a 2 H. 13, McNutt v. Bland. 
 6 9 Wall. 401, Xoonan v. Bradley. 
 a 11 Wall. 175, Coal Co. u. BlatcU- 
 
 ford. 
 a 13 Wall. 67, Bice v. Houston. 
 
 CHILES, BOON V. See Boon d. Chiles. 
 CHILES, TEXAS v. See Texas 11. Chiles. 
 CHINA, THE, 7 Wall. 58. 
 
 Collision ; liability of vessel while 
 in charge of a pilot, a 
 
 CHIRAC V. CHIRAC, 8 Wh. S59. 
 
 Alienage; treaty of 1778 between 
 France and the U. S. a 
 
 Constitution ; natnralizati9n ; ex- 
 clusive power of Congress, h 
 
 a 14 Wall. 202, The Merrimac. 
 a 91 U. S. 546, Barnes v. Dis=. of C. 
 a 93 U. S. 107, Sherlock v. Ailing. 
 
 a 10 Wh. 181, Carneal w. Banks. 
 
 6 5H. 573, License Cases. (Ta- 
 ney, Ch. J.) 
 
 a 100 U.S. 489, Hauenstein u. Lyn- 
 ham. 
 
 CHIRAC T. BEINECKER, 11 WTl. 380. 
 
 Ejectment ; when recovery evi- 
 dence in action for mesne profits, a 
 
 Entries nunc pro tunc; discre- 
 tionars'. 6 
 
 Instructions; must be founded 
 on evidence, c 
 
 Bents and profits, d • 
 
 CHISLOMN V. GEORGIA, 3 DaU. 419, 
 
 Judicial power previous to 11th 
 amendment of the Constitution ex- 
 tended to a case in which State was 
 a party defendant, a 
 
 Process against a State. 6 
 
 o 2 P. 613, Chirac v. Eeinecker. 
 6 16 H. 576, Slicer v. Bank, 
 c 20 H. 246, White «. Biu-nley. 
 d 17 Wall. 292, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 
 o 1 P. 118, Gov. of Ga. v. Madrazb 
 
 6 3 P. 461 , New Jersey u. N. York 
 
 6 5 P. 284, Same. 
 
 a 11 P. 259, Briscoe v. Bank. 
 
 6 24 H. 95, Kentucky v. Dennisou. 
 
 CHISM, DAT V. See Day v. Chism. 
 CHITTENDEN t. BREWSTER, 3 Wall 
 
 Supreme Court; party not ap- 
 pealing cannot generally assign 
 errors, a 
 
 CHOTARD V. POPE, 13 Wh. 588. 
 
 Public lands ; sales of. a 
 
 196. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 511, The Gray Eagle. 
 a 12 Wall. 135, Mail Co. i,. Flanders 
 a 94 U. S. 604, The Steph. Morgan 
 
 a 19 Wall. 196, Eldred v. Sexton. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPEEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 59 
 
 CHOUTEAU V. ECKHABT, it H. 375 
 
 Missouri land titles ; imperfect 
 titles, a 
 
 Writs of error to State court, b 
 
 Missouri land claims ; bar created 
 by the act of 1S24. c 
 
 Junior and senior confirnia- 
 tious. d 
 
 Act 13th June, 1812, as to com- 
 mons, e 
 
 Ejectment without patent, f 
 
 CHOUTEAU, GIBSON v. 
 CHOUTEAU V. U. S., 9 P 
 
 Missouri land titles ; fraud, a 
 
 Eights of holders of concessions 
 on acquisition of Louisiana, b 
 
 Concessions by lieutenant-gover- 
 nors, c 
 
 Imperfect titles, d 
 
 CHRIST CHURCH v. PHIXADBI-PHIA, 84 H< 
 
 a 3 H. 784, U. S. v. King. 
 6 4 H. 177, Jonrdon v. Barrett, 
 c 4 H. 450, Les Bois v. Bramell. 
 a 7 H. 590, Kennedy v. Hunt. 
 d 10 H. 369, Landes v. Brant. 
 e 16 H. 507, Guitard v. Stoddard.' 
 / 19 H. 334, Bryan v. Forsyth. 
 6 22 H. 202, Lytle v. Arkansas. 
 e 22 H. 341. Berthold u. McDonald. 
 e 1 Bl. 189, Carondeletu. St.Xouis 
 a 14 Wall. 313, Dent v. Emmerger. 
 See Gibson v. Chouteau. 
 148. 
 
 a 10 P. 340, Mackey v. U. S. 
 6 12 P. 427, Strotlier v. Lucas, 
 c 8 H. 301, Menard ». Massey. 
 d 97 U. S. 215, McMicken v. U. S. 
 
 301. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; exemptions of church prop- 
 erty from taxation, a 
 
 License by a State revocable. 6 
 
 Grant of privileges construed 
 against the grantee, c 
 CHRISTIE, CARNOCHAN v. See Oarnoohan v. Christie. 
 CHRISTMAS V. RUSSEXL, 6 'WaU. 303. 
 
 Demurrer; judgment; when a 
 bar. a 
 
 Constitution ; faitli and credit to 
 be given to judgments; authentica- 
 tion . b 
 
 Impeaching judgments; fraud, c 
 
 Constitution ; statutes of limita- 
 tions; power of the States to 
 d 
 
 a 22 Wall. 574, Tuckers. Ferguson 
 a 93 U. S. 598, K. B. u. Superv'rs. 
 6 94 U. S. 541, Doyle v. Ins. Co. 
 c 97 U. S. 667, Fertilizing Co. v. 
 
 Hyde Park, 
 c 100 U. S. 561, Newton v. Com'rs 
 
 CHRISTMAS v. RUSSELI-, 14 Wall. 
 
 Equitable assignments, a 
 
 CHRISTIE, EX PARTE, 3 H. 308. 
 
 Jurisdiction of District Court in 
 bankruptcy; act of 1841. a 
 
 Mortgages. 6 
 
 Appeals to Supreme Court, c 
 
 Obiter dicta, d 
 
 Supreme Court ; prohibition, e 
 
 A.ssignees in bankruptcy; power 
 to sue in the State courts. / 
 
 a 7 Wall. 100, Aurora v. West. 
 
 b 7 Wall. 148, Green v. Van Bus- 
 kirk. 
 
 6 9 Wall. 123, Cheever v. Wilson. 
 
 6 18 Wall. 467, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 7, Habich v. Folger. 
 
 c 21 Wall. 426, Michaels v. Post. 
 
 c 22 Wall. 81, Max\^^ell v. Stewart. 
 
 6 95 U. S. 422, Tnrnball v. Payson . 
 
 d 95 U- S. 633, Terry v. Anderson. 
 
 a 99'U. S. 488, Montgomery v. 
 Samory. 
 
 78. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 440, Dillon v. Barnard. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 477, Removal Cases. 
 
 a 3 H. 434, Norton v. Boyd. 
 6 6 H. 506, Houston v. City Bank, 
 c 13 H. 11, Crawford v. Points. 
 d 16 H. 279, Carroll v. Carroll. 
 e 1 Bl. 505, ex parte Gordon. 
 e 10 Wall. 543, ex parte Graliam. 
 a 11 Wall. 80, Morgan n.Thornhill 
 a 23 Wall. 134, Ray v. Nosewortliy. 
 /93 U. S. 135, Cla'flin u. Houseman 
 e 95 U. S. 72, ex parte Easton. 
 
60 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 CHUKCH, DOTTNES v. See Downes «. Churoh. 
 CHUKCH V. HTJBBABD, 8 Cr. 839. 
 
 Exceptions to charge ot court, a 
 
 Marine insurance ; insurer not 
 li.able for seizure for illicit trad- 
 ing. 6 
 
 Anthentication of foreign laws, c 
 
 CHY LUNG V. FREEMAN, 92 U. S. 
 
 Constitution ; I'egulation of com- 
 merce ; transportation, a 
 Police power. 6 
 
 CINCINNATI V. WHITE, 6 P. 431. 
 
 Dedication to public use. a 
 When and in whom title vests. 6 
 When parties holding the legal 
 
 title cannot recover against those 
 
 beneficially entitled, c 
 Ejectment; right of possession, d 
 Estoppels in pais, e 
 
 a 4 Cr. 69, Smith v. Carrington. 
 6 8 P. 49.5, Carrington v. Ins. Co. 
 c 13 P. 217, Stein v. Bowman, 
 c 14 H. 412, Ennis v. Smith. 
 
 875. 
 
 a95U. 
 6 97U. 
 
 S. 470. E. E. Co. V. Hiisen. 
 S. 34, Beer Co. v. Mass. 
 
 10 P. 710, New Orleans v. U. S. 
 9 H. 25, Irwin ». Dixion. 
 14 H. 271, Vincennes v. Ind. 
 6 Wall. 470, Doe v. Consedine. 
 96 U. S 723, Morgan v. E. E. 
 d 100 U. S. 582, Dickerson v. Col- 
 grove. 
 e 101 U. S. 499, Baker U.Humphrey 
 
 a 3 Wall. 615, The Admiral. 
 
 6 12 Wall. 134, Mail Co. ». Flanders 
 
 ». Circuit Judges. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 297, Lexington v. Butler. 
 6 16 Vfa\\. 663, St. Joseph e. Eogers. 
 a 98 U. S. 473, Amy v. Dubuqne. 
 
 CIRCASSIAN, THE, 8 Wall. 135. 
 
 Prize ; violation of blockade, a 
 
 Civil war; occupation of New 
 Orleans; rights of inhabitants. 6 
 CIRCUIT JUDGES, U. S. V. See U. S. 
 CITIZENS' BAJS-K, BANK OF WEST TENNESSEE v. See Bank of West 
 
 Tennessee v. Citizens' Bank. 
 CITY, THE, GOODRICH v. See Ooodrich «. The City. 
 CITY V. LAMSON, 9 WaU. 483. 
 
 Bonds; coupons; negotiability; 
 limitations, a. 
 
 Municipal aid to railroads ; ratifi- 
 cation by legislature, h 
 
 CITY OF WASHINGTON, THE, 98 U. S. 436. 
 
 Collision ; lookouts, a | a 92 U. S. 437, The America. 
 
 CITY BANK, HOUSTON v. See Houston v. City Bank. 
 CITY BANK, "WILSON v. See Wilson v. City Bank. 
 
 CITY BANK OF COLUMBUS, U. S. v. See U. S. v. City Bank oi Columbus. 
 ClAFtlN V. HOUSEMAN, 93 U. S. 130. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; when jurisdiction I a 95 U. S. 59, MoHenry v. La Sooi- 
 of U. S. courts not exclusive, a \ 6t^ Franpaise. 
 
 CliAFtlN, LINCOtN V. See Lincoln v. Olaflin. 
 CI-APP, PROVIDENCE v. See Providence v. Clapp. 
 CLAPP, SMITH V. See Smith v. Clapp. 
 CLARK V. BARNWELL, 18 H. 878. 
 
 Carriers by water ; 
 liability of ship, a 
 Burden of proof. 
 
 loss of goods ; 
 
 a 21 H. 29, Propeller Niagara. 
 6 7 Bl. 160, Nelson v. Woodruff^. 
 a 1 Wall. 51, Comm'r-in-Chief. 
 a 9 Wall. 459, The Maggie Ham- 
 mond. 
 6 11 Wall. 134, Tr. Co. v. Downer. 
 a 14 Wall. 597, The Delaware. 
 a 21 Wall. 13, The Lady Pike. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 61 
 
 CliABK, BOOTH v. See BooOi v. Clark. 
 CLAKK V. BOWEN, 88 H. 873. 
 
 Comproiiiises ; n o n-p e r f o r m - I a 95 U. S. 
 ance. a \ 
 
 CLAKK, BROWN V. See Brown v. Clark. 
 CI.AKK, CANAX, CO. V. See Canal Co. u. Clark. 
 
 484, Brown v. Spofforcl. 
 
 CLAKK V. CAKKINGTON, 7 Cr. 316. 
 
 GiiMi-aiitj-. a 
 
 CI.AKK V. CI.AKK, 17 H. 318. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; sale and fiaudulent 
 purchase by bankrupt of claim 
 against the Mexican GrQvernment 
 void, a 
 
 CliABK V. COURTNEY, 5 P. 354. 
 
 Seizin ; presumption that it is 
 legal ; co-extensive with right and 
 continues until ouster, a 
 
 Mode of executing a deed by an 
 attorne.v. 6 
 
 Covenants in deed, c 
 
 I a 92 U. S. 394, Smeltzer v. White. 
 
 a 17 H. 327, Booth v. Clark. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 23, Glenny v. Langdon. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 306, Phelpsj)..McDouald. 
 
 a 6 P. 706, U. S. v. Arredondo. 
 
 a 10 P. 200, Boon v. Chiles. 
 
 a 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lncas. 
 
 6 13 P. 18, Van Ness v. Bank. 
 
 a 3 H. 687, Clvmer v. Dawkins. 
 
 c 8 H. 464, Le Eoy v. Beard. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 146, Armstrong v. Mor- 
 rill. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 368, Hunnicutt v. Pey- 
 ton. 
 
 CIiARK V. GRAHAM, 6 MVTi. 577. 
 
 Lands ; title to regulated by law I a 
 of tlie place where situated, a \ 
 
 CI.ARK V. lOW^A CITY, 20 WaU. 583. 
 
 Negotiable paper; coupons; lim- 
 itations, a 
 
 1 U. S. 635, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 473, Amy v. Dnbuqiie. 
 a 102 U. S. 684, Hartmau v. Gi-een- 
 liovv. 
 
 CliARK T. ISEtlN, 81 "Wall. 368. 
 
 Bankruptcy; preferences, a 
 Pledge ; collateral securities, b 
 
 a 21 Wall. 381, Watson v. Taylor. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 121, Sawyer v. Tnrpin. 
 
 6 96 U. S. 476, Casey v. Cavaroc. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 743, Stewart v. Piatt. 
 CI.ARK, JACBKON V. See Jackson v. Clark. . 
 
 ei-ARK, MARION CO. v. See Marion Co. v. Clark. 
 CLARK, NEAIi v. See Neal v. Clarki 
 
 CLARK, PAWI.ET, TOWN OE, v. See Pawlet, Town of, d. Clark. 
 CLARK, PORTERFIEIiD T. See Porterfleld v. Clark. 
 CliARK, NEW ORLEANS v. See New Orleans v. Clark. 
 CLARK V. REYBURN,-8 Wall. 318. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- I a 96 U. S. 638, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 tract; remedy; mortgages, a \ 
 
 CLARK, RUSSELL v. See Russell v. Clark. 
 CLARK, SMITH v. See Smith v. Clark. 
 CLARK V. U. S., 6 Wall. 546. 
 
 U. S. contracts; damages, a | a 94 U. S. 217, U. 8. v. Smith. 
 CLARK, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Clark. 
 
62 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 ClARK V. 
 
 Equitj' ; 
 clence. a 
 
 VAN KIENSDYK, 9 Cr. 
 
 answers : when evi- 
 
 CtARK V. WASHINGTON, 18 Wh. 
 
 Lottery ^raiit. a 
 
 Municipal coi-porations ; how far 
 legislatni-e can delegate tlieir power 
 to. 6 
 
 Liabiiitj' for acta of agents, c 
 
 CI.ABK V. YOUNG, 1 Cr. 181. 
 
 Sale ; taking note in payment, a 
 Action on original contract; suit 
 
 on note ; production of. b 
 
 CI.ARK CO., U. S. V. See U. S. v. Clark Co, 
 
 CLARKE, DUNN v. See Dimii v. Clarke. 
 
 CI;ABKE V. MATTHEWSON, 18 P. 171. 
 
 153. 
 
 a 5 7. 107, Unron Bank v. Geary. ' ; 
 a 13 H. 163, Buck'gliam v. McLean. 
 a 2 Wall. 430, Tobey v. Leonards. 
 a 11 Wall. 233, May v. LeClaire. 
 a 16 Wall. 30, Voorhees v. Bone- 
 steel. 
 a 99 U. S. 206, Goddenu. Kimmell. 
 
 40. 
 
 a 5 P. 300, Shankland v. Wash- 
 ington. 
 
 6 10 H. 532, East Hartford u. Hart- 
 ford Bridge Co. 
 
 c 18 H. 480, Bacon v. Kobertson. 
 
 a 3 Or. 311, Harris v. Jolinston. 
 6 16 P. 320, Boacli v. HuUings. 
 
 Parties ; personal representa- 
 tives, a 
 
 U. S. cnnrts; jurisdiction having 
 once attaclied no subsequent cliange 
 will oust it. b 
 
 Writ of error; not the commence- 
 ment of a new action, c 
 
 Injunction on equity side U. S. 
 court to restrain action at law in 
 same court ancillary, d 
 
 CLARKE V. RUSSELL, 3 DaU. 415. 
 
 Statute of frauds ; subsequent 
 parol agreement, a 
 
 CLARKE V. SMITH, 13 P. 800. 
 
 Land laws ;• reservations ; loca- 
 tion of land ; Indian lands, a 
 
 Equity ; bill to quiet title ; en- 
 forcement of the Kentucky statute 
 by the Circuit Court U. S. b 
 
 Cloud on title, c 
 
 CLARKE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Clarke. 
 CLARKE, WARING v. See Waring v. Clarke 
 CLEARWATER v. MERIDITH, 1 Wall. 48, 
 
 a 2 H. 13, McNutt v. Bland. 
 6 15 H. 207, Kanouse v. Martin. 
 a 20 H. 542, Whyte v. Gibbes. 
 c 24 H. 205, Nations v. Jolmson. 
 d 24 H. 460, Freeman v. Howe. 
 d 10 Wall. 333, Jones v. Andrews. 
 d 14 Wall. 81, Christmas w Russell 
 d 22 Wall. 253, French u. Hay. 
 
 a 22 H. 42, Emerson v. Slater. 
 a 9 Wall. 272, Swain ,u. Seamens. 
 
 a 2 H. 106, Porterfleld v. Clark. 
 b 17 H. 48, Wicklefle v. Owings. 
 6 18 H. 139, Parker v. Overman. 
 6 24 H. 160, Fitch v. Creighton. 
 c 2 Bl. 445, Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 a 95 U. S. 52.5, Beecherjj.Wetherby 
 6 99 U. S. 401, Smith v. K. R. Co. 
 
 Pleading over; when waiver of 
 
 demurrer, a 
 Bailioads ; consolidation. 6 
 Judgment on demurrer ; when 
 
 a bar. c 
 
 a 7 Wall. 92, Aurora v. West. 
 a 8 Wall. 287, Can.al v. Coal Co. 
 a 8 Wall. 357, Young v. Martin. 
 a 9 Wall. 762, Watkiiis u. U. S. 
 a 10 Wall. 423, Campbell i). Wilcox 
 a 12 Wall. 84, R. R. Co. v. Harris. 
 6 19 Wall. 253, Nugent r. Superv's. 
 c 91 U. S. 534, Gould v. Ev. R. B. 
 6 92 U. S. 671, B. R. Co. v. Georgia 
 a 93 U. S. 553, Stanton v. Erabrey. 
 6 95 U. S. 324, Sliields v. Barrow. 
 6 98 U. S. 363, R. R. Co. v. Georgia 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 63 
 
 CIEAKWATEK v. BIERXDITH, 21 H. 493. 
 
 U. S. courts ; iiirisJiotioii where 
 some of the defendants cannot be 
 served ; act 2Stli February, 1839. a 
 
 Jurisdiction in suits between citi- 
 zens of different States ; parties. 6 
 
 CI-EMENTS V. BERRT, 11 H. 411. 
 
 Judgment liens in U. S. courts, a 
 
 a 1 Bl. 571, Inbnsch v. Farwell. 
 6 93 U. S. 204, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 43S, Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 
 CliEMENTS, BROWW v. See Brown v. Clements. 
 CLEMENTS V. MOORE, 6 "Wall. 310. 
 
 Supreme Conrt; objections must 
 be talien first in court below, a 
 Fraudulent conveyances, h 
 
 Cr-BMENTSON V. WrLlIAMS, 8 Cr. 78. 
 
 Statute of limitations ; reviving 
 debt barred, a 
 
 a 22 Wall. 204, Fritz v. Stover. 
 b 101 U. S. 499, Baker r.Humphr'y 
 
 a 11 Wh. 310, Wetzell v. Bnssard. 
 a 1 P. 351, Bell v. Morrison. 
 a 6 P. 86, Moore «. Bank of Col. 
 a 13 Wall. 256, U. S. u. Wilder. 
 
 CtEVEL'D & K. R. CO., ZABRISKIE v. See Zabriskie v. Cleyel'd A E. R. Co. 
 
 CMFTON V. SHEIDON, 83 H. 483. 
 
 Supreme Court; "amount in 
 controversy." a 
 
 CLIFTON M. U. S., 4 H. 348. 
 
 Customs; seizures hy collectors; 
 probable cause ; onus probandi. a 
 
 Forfeitures; at what time thej"^ 
 attach. 6 
 
 a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 143, Cliq. Champagne. 
 6 14 Wall. 57, Henderson's Dis- 
 tilled Spirits. 
 
 CMNTON BRIDGE, THE, 10 Wall. 462. 
 
 Constitution ; legislative and ju- 
 dicial functions; power of Con- 
 giess to give a construction to a 
 law. a 
 
 Regulation of commerce. 6 
 
 a 20 Wall. 332, Stockdale v. Ins. Co. 
 b 93 U. S. 13, S. Car. v. Georgia. 
 
 CMNTON V. ENGIiEBRECHT, 13 'Wall. 434. 
 
 Territorial courts, a | a 95 U. S. 98, Good v. Martin. 
 
 Whether the courts of the Dis- \a 98 U. S. 154, Eeynolds w. U. S. 
 trict of Columbia are U. S. courts, ft 1 6 102 U. S. 668, Page v. Burnsline. 
 
 CriQUOT'S CHAMPAGNE, 3 Wall. 145. 
 
 Kevenuelaws; construction. 
 Agency ; when knowledge 
 agent knowli'dge of piincipal. 
 Evidence ; entries, c 
 
 a 10 Wall. 406, U. S. v. Hodson. 
 6 13 Wall. 550, Stockwell v. U. S. 
 a 23 Wall. 380, Smythe v. Fiske. 
 c 99 U. S. 667, Evanstown uGunn 
 
 ClISE, BARTH V. See Barth v. Clise. 
 CI.OUGH, PACKET CO. v. See Packet Co. v. Clough. 
 CI/OUGH, STURGIS v. See Sturgis v. Clough. 
 CLYDE V. U. S., 13 WaU. 39. 
 
 Court of Claims ; when applica- 
 tion for payment must be made at 
 the Treasury before suing, a 
 
 a 96 U. S. 571, U. S. v. Kaufman, 
 
64 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 COAl CO. V. BliATCHFORD, 11 Wall. 17. 
 
 U. S. courts ; iurisdiction ; citi- 
 zenship ; executors and adminis- 
 trators, a 
 
 Nominal and real parties; re- 
 movals. 6 
 
 13 Wall. 67, Kice v. Houston. 
 18 Wall. o75, Sew. Ma. Co. Cas. 
 
 20 Wall. 123, Knappjj.E.K. Co. 
 
 21 Wall. 41, Gardner ». Brown 
 91 U. S. 677, Florida v. Ander- 
 son. 
 
 6 101 U. S. 589, Walden v. Skinner 
 
 COCHBAN, WEST v. See West v. Cooliraii. 
 COCKRELI,, FISHER v. See Fisher v. Cockrell. 
 CODBINGTON v. RICHARDSON, 10 W^aU. 616. 
 
 Trial witliont jury; fliiilinj^ of 
 facts; review of by Supreme Court, a 
 "The Record." 6 
 
 a 18 Wall. 248. Ins. Co. v. Folsora. 
 a 21 Wall. 161, Ins. Co. v. Sea. 
 6 91 U. S. 132, R. E. w. Trustees. 
 a 98 U. S. 443, The Abbotsford. 
 
 COE, BATES V. See Bates v. Ooe. 
 COE, PENNOCK V. See Pennock i;. Ooe. 
 eOFIELD V. McClBttAN, 16 W^all. 331. 
 
 Public lands ; town-site lands, a | a 99 U. S. 615, Stringfellow o. Cain, i 
 COEIBIO), XHTON V. See Tilton v. Oofleld. 
 COHEN, MCBI.MOT1.E v. See MoElmoyle v. Cohen. 
 COHENS V. VIRGINIA, 6 WU. 864. 
 
 Federal question j writ of error to 
 State conits. u, 
 
 Judicial power of the U. S.; ex- 
 tent of. 6 
 
 Constitution ; construction, c 
 
 Obiter dicta, d 
 
 Error; when apparent on the 
 I'ecord, it is open to revision, wheth- 
 er shown by bill of exceptions or 
 otherwise, e 
 
 Writ of error not the commence- 
 ment of a new action, f 
 
 Supreme Court ; original juris- 
 diction, g 
 
 What is a "suit." h 
 
 U. S. ; only remedy against, ex- 
 cept in Court of Claims, is by ap- 
 peal to Congress, i 
 
 Citation, j 
 
 District of Columbia; power of 
 Congress over, k 
 
 a 6 P. 536, Worcester v. Georgia. 
 6 12 P. 714, Rliode Island v. Mass. 
 c 16 P. 608, Prigg v. Penn. 
 c 12 H. 311, Coolev v. B. of Ward. 
 (£16 H. 27fi, Carroll v. Carroll. 
 e 20 H. 433, Snj'dam ^.Williamson. 
 y24H. 205, Nations v. Johnson. 
 g 1 Wall. 252, ex parte Vallaudi- 
 
 ghani. 
 e 1 Wall. 600, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 e 3 Wall. 661, Rogers v. Bui-ling- 
 
 ton. 
 
 h 4 Wall. 113, ex ^arie Millegan. 
 
 6 Wall. 253, Mayor v. Cooper. 
 
 6 Wall. 488, U. S. v. Eokford. 
 
 10 Wall. 261, R. R. V. Morgan. 
 
 10 Wall. 291, Slaughter-House 
 
 12 Wall. 533, Legal Tender Cas. 
 
 16 Wall. 386, Ins. Co. v. Piaggio. 
 
 91 TJ. S. 146, Atherton « Fowler 
 
 j 93 U. S. 87, Kitchen v. Kan- 
 
 dolph. 
 & 93 U. S. 142, Claflin v. House- 
 man. 
 a 96 U. S. 201, Gold Washing Co. 
 V. Keys. 
 S. 690, Mattingly v. Col. 
 S. 264, Tennesee U.Davis. 
 S. 140, E. R. Co. V. Miss. 
 
 k 97 U. 
 6 100 U. 
 a 102 U. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DKCISIONS. 
 
 65 
 
 COIT V. ROBrNSON, 19 WaU. 874. 
 
 Supreme Court ; bankruptcy ap- 
 peals; supei-visory jurisdiction of 
 Circuit Court, a 
 
 a 23 Wall. 160, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 a 23 Wall. 293, Saudusky v. Bank. 
 a 93 U. S. 348, Wiswall v. Camp- 
 bell. 
 
 See Society for Savings v. Coite. 
 
 COITE, SOCIETY FOR SAVINGS v. 
 COIBATH, BUCK v. See Buck v. Colbath. 
 COLEMAN V. TENNESSEE, 97 U. S. 509. 
 
 War; array; when exempt from | a 100 U. S. 164, Dow ». Johnsou. 
 the civil jurisdiction, a \ 
 
 COtESIAN, VEBDEN v. See Verden v. Coleman. 
 COIGROVE, DICKERSON v. See Dickerson v. Oolgrove. 
 COLIAK CO. V. VAN DUSEN, 83 Wall. 563. 
 
 Patent law ; use prior to applica- | a 94 U. S. 197, Dunbar v. Myers, 
 tion for patent, a I a 95 U. S. 218, Roemer u. Simon. 
 
 COLLECTOR, THE, 6 Wli. 194. 
 
 a Wall. 412, The Wm. Bagaley. 
 a 20 Wall. 225, The Lottowauna. 
 a 95 Wall. 617, The Wanata. 
 
 Piize ; when appeal lies to Cir- 
 cuit from District Court; when 
 property follows the appeal, a 
 
 COLLECTOR, BANK FOR SAVINGS v. See Bank for Savings v. Collector. 
 COLLECTOR V. BE6G8, 17 WaU. 187. 
 
 Revenue; tax on distillers, a | a20 Wall.197, Pahlmanu.CoUect'r 
 COLLECTOR, BROOME v. See Broome «. Collector. 
 COLLECTOR V. DAT, 11 Wall. 184. 
 
 Constitution; what provisions are I a 100 U. S. 348, ex par^e Virginia, 
 declaratory, a \ 
 
 COLLECTOR, GABDNER v. See Gardner v. Collector. 
 COLLECTOR, HADDEN v. See Hadden v. Collector. 
 COLLECTOR, HOIMDER v. See Homer v. Collector. 
 COLLECTOR, HORNTHALL v. See Hornthall v. Collector. 
 COLLECTOR V. HUBBARD, IS Wall. 1. 
 
 Revenue; 
 taxes, a 
 
 I'ecovery back of 
 
 a 92 U. S. 90, Cheatham ». U. S. 
 a 98 U. S. 544, R.R.Co.«. Com'rs 
 a 101 U. S. 179, Wright KBlakeslec! 
 
 COLLECTOR, BaMBALL v. See Kimball v. Collector. 
 
 COLLECTOR, PHILADELPHIA v. See PMladelpMa v. Collector. 
 
 COLLECTOR, RAILROAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. u. Collector. 
 
 COLLECTOR V. RICHARDS, 83 WaU. 846. 
 
 Duties ; value of the franc, a | a 102 U. S. 615, Cramer v. Arthur. 
 COLLECTOR, STUBGES v. See Sturges v. Collector. 
 COLLIER V. STANBBOUGH, 6 H. 14. 
 
 Supreme Court; judgment re- a 7 H. 178, Erwin p. Lowry. 
 versed or affirmed on the whole rec- 
 ord ; Federal courts ; administra- 
 tion, a 
 
 COLLINS, GARDNER v. See Gardner v. Collins. 
 COLLINS X. GILBERT, 94 U. S. 763. 
 
 Negotiable paper; indorsement a 95 U. S. 94, Good ». Martin, 
 without date; at what time pre- 6 93 U. S. 478, Brown i'. Spofford. 
 sunied to have been made, a 6 97 U. S. 24, Hotel Co. v. Wade. 
 
 Promissory notes; boua-flde 6 97 U. S. 266, Lilienthairs Tobac- 
 holders ; proof, b co. 
 
 5 
 
66 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 COIiOMA V. EAVES, 93 V. S. 486. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; conditions precedent; re- 
 citals ; bona-tide holders, a 
 
 There must be legislative author- 
 ity. 6 
 
 a 92 U. S. 499, Venice v. Murdock. 
 a 92 U. S. 639, Marcy v. Oswego. 
 a 94 U. S. 108, Comm'rs v. Bolles. 
 b 94U.S. 262, S.Ottowaw Perkins. 
 a 94 U. S. 287, Comm'rs v. Clark. 
 a 97 U. S. 104, Warren v. Marcy. 
 6 98 U. S. 102, Daviess v. Hiiide- 
 
 koper. 
 a 102 U. S. 290, Buchanan v. Litch- 
 field. 
 
 COLT, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. u. Colt, 
 CtJI-T, STANLEY V. See Stanley v. Colt. 
 COLUMBIAN INS. CO. v. ASHBT, 13 P. 331. 
 
 General average, a 
 
 a 10 H. 299, Barnard a. Adams. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 374, McxVndrews v. 
 Thatcher. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 282, Star of Hope. , 
 
 a 12 Wail. 117, Fowler v. Rath- 
 bones. 
 
 COLUMBIAN INS. CO. v. CATLETT, lH Wh. 383. 
 
 Marine insurance ; freight, a | a 7 H. 604, Hugg v. Ins. Co. 
 COLUMBIAN INS. CO., JAUNET v. See Janney v. Columbian Ins. Co. 
 COLUMBIAJf INS. CO., LAWRENCE v. See Lawrence v. Columbian Ins. Co.« 
 COLUMBIANS INS. CO. v. LA WHENCE, 10 P. 607. 
 
 Insurance ; loss through negli- 
 gence of assured, a 
 
 Insurance by mortgagor ; inter- 
 est insured ; misrepresentations. 6 
 
 Preliminary proofs, c 
 
 COLUMBIAN INS. CO. V. 
 
 a 11 P. 213, Waters v. Ins. Co, 
 6 16 P. 496, Carpenter v. Ins. Co. 
 6 8 H. 24.5, Clark v. Ins. Co. 
 c 9 H. 388, Tayloe v. Fire Ins. Co. 
 6 5 Wall. 512, Ins. Co. v. Chase. 
 6 14 Wall. 509, Ins. Co. v. Hamilton 
 b 95 U. S. 248, Ins. Co. v. Haven. 
 
 WHEELWRIGHT, 7 Wll. 634. 
 
 District of Columbia ; courts, a 
 Final judgments; peremptory 
 mandamus ; writ of error. 6 
 
 COLUMBIAN TURNPIKE CO, 
 COMBS V. HODGE, ai H. 397.' 
 
 Stocks and bonds ; sale by agent ; 
 authority, a 
 
 COMEGYS V. VASSE, 1 P. 193. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; right of assignee to 
 claims of bankrupt, a 
 
 Commissions under treaty; con- 
 clusiveness of awards. 6 
 
 Conflicting claims to amount ad- 
 judicated may be litigated in the 
 oi'dinai-y courts of justice, c 
 
 Assignment of claims, d 
 
 a 12 P. 608, Kendall v. U. S. 
 6 14 P. 561, Holmes v. Jennison. 
 b 22 H. 182, U. S. ex rel. v. Addison. 
 
 WISE V. See Wise v. Colum. Turnpike Co. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 198, Hodge v. Coombs. 
 
 a 13 P. 411, Emerson v. Hall. 
 6 14 P. 95, Frevall v. Bache. 
 a 16 P. 224j Milnor ». Metz. 
 b 17 H. 612, Judson v. Corcoran, 
 c 20 H. 7, Garland v. Wynn. 
 6 24 H. 822, Meyer v. White. 
 c 2 Bl. 558, Lindsey v. Havves. 
 d 97 U. S. 396, Erwin v. U. S. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 308, Phelps v. McDonald 
 
 COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, THE, 1 WaU. 61. 
 
 Salvage ; in whose name suit I a 10 Wall. 11, The Blackwell. 
 should be brought, a 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 67 
 
 COMraCERCE, THE, 1 Bl. 688. 
 
 Common cairiers by water ; lia- 
 bility of ship for damage to cargo 
 by collision, a 
 
 Libels ill rem,; where to be pros- 
 eciitetl. 6 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction, c 
 
 Salvage; in whose name libel 
 should be filed, d 
 
 COIVIMEKCEN, THE, 1 WTi. 38 
 
 Prize; contraband, a 
 
 COMMEBCIAl BANK v, BttCKINGHAM, S H. 348. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 51, Com'iKler-in-Chief. 
 6 2 Wall. 403, Slavers. 
 a 3 Wall. 266, ISTewell u. Norton, 
 c 7 Wall. 637, The Belfast. 
 6 9 Wall. 457, The Maggie Ham- 
 mond. 
 d 10 Wall. 11, The Blao'kwell. 
 c 16 Wall. 531, St. Co. v. Chase. 
 6 20 Wall. 163, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 6 97 U. S. 412, 4 Packages v. U. S. 
 
 I 5 Wall. 58, The Peterhoff. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; remedy, a • 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court ; how Federal question 
 must appear. h 
 
 a 6 H. 831, Bank v. Sharp. 
 b 12 H. 119, Williams v. Oliver. 
 6 14 H. 152, Lawler w. Walker. 
 6 1 Wall. 144, Bridge Prop. v. Ho- 
 
 boken. 
 6 10 Wall. .510, Masse n ge r u. Mason 
 6 92 U. S. 329, Brown v. Atwell. 
 
 COMMEKCIAl BANK v, BUCKNEB, 30 H. 113. 
 
 Demurrer; admit facts when, a | a 7 Wall. 99, Aurora v. West. 
 
 COalMEKCIAL MUT. INS. CO. T. UNION M. INS. CO., 19 H. 333. 
 
 Insurance ; premium notes, a | a 12 Wall. 304, Miller v. Ins. Co. 
 
 COMMERCIAL AND RAILROAD BANK t. SLOCOMB, 14 P. 60. 
 
 Corporation ; citizenship; juris- 
 diction Circuit Courts, a 
 
 Sec. 11 of judiciary act of 1789, 
 prohibiting suits against an inhabit- 
 ant of the U. S. except where he 
 inliabits or is found. 6 
 
 Pleading ; demurrers, c 
 
 a 14 P. 298, Irvine v. Lowry. 
 a 2 H. 550, K. K. Co. v. Letson. 
 b 21 H. 490, Clearwater w.Meridith. 
 c 23 H. 444, Bell v. Vicksburg. 
 a 18 Wall. 575, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 a 20 Wall. 8, Habich v. Polger. 
 b 93 U. S. 205, Ober «. Gallagher. 
 
 COMMISSIONER T. WHITEIJET, 4 WaU. 582. 
 
 Mandamus to heads of depart- 
 ments; ministerial duties, a 
 
 a 7 Wall. 351, Gaines v. Thomp- 
 son. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 312, Sec.u.McGarrahan 
 
 a 14 Wall. 166, ea; parte Newman. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 395, U. S. v. Schurz. 
 COMMISSIONERS, MoCOMB T. See McOomb v. Commissioners. 
 COMMISSIONERS, PEOPI.E v. See People «. Commissioners. 
 COMMISSIONERS, WORTHY v. See Wortliy i). Commissioners. 
 COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Com. Land Office. 
 COMMONWEALTH, McGUIRE v. See McGuire t>. Commonwealth. 
 COMMONTVEAXTH, NAT. BANK v. See Nat. Bank v. Commonwealth. 
 COMMONWEAXTH, PERVEAR v. See Pervear v. Commonwealth. 
 COMMONWEALTH, TWITCHELL v. See Twitohell v. Commonwealth. 
 COMMONWEAXTH BANK v. GRIFFITH, 14 P. 56. 
 
 Writs of error to State court ; I a 5 H. 67, Walker v. Taylor. 
 Supreme Court ; Federal question, a \ 
 
 COMSTOCK V. CRAWFORD, 3 Wall. 396. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a I a 101 U. S. 425, Mohr v. Manierre. 
 
 I a 102 U. S. 464, Hall v. Law. 
 
68 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 COMSTOCK, rNS. CO. v. See las. Co. v. Comstock. 
 CONABD V. ATLANTIC INS. CO., 1 P. 434. 
 
 Fraud on creditors ; retaining 
 possession of tiling sold, a 
 
 When pleading to merits admits 
 capacity to sue. 6 
 
 Pi-ioritj- of U. S. c 
 
 Mortgage; nature of estate of 
 mortgagee, d 
 
 Judgment liens, e 
 
 Sale ; constructive delivery. / 
 
 Judgments of U. S. courts ; juris- 
 diction, ff 
 
 Mortgages for future advances, h 
 
 Bills of lading ; effect of indorse- 
 ment, i 
 
 CONABD V. NICHOLL, 4 P. 891. 
 
 Prioi-ity of U. S. a 
 Fraud against creditors, 6 
 
 4 P. 147, Harris v. D'Wolf. 
 
 4 P. 291, Conard v. Nicholl. 
 
 4 P. 500, Society,&c..i).Pawlet. 
 
 6 P. 279, Conard v. Ins. Co. 
 
 6 P. 706, U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 
 8 P. 271, U. S. V. Hack. 
 - 10 P. 610, Brent v. Bank, 
 c 12 P. 131, Beaston v. Bank. 
 a 12 P. 187, Clarke v. White. 
 d IH. 311, Bronson v. Kinzie. 
 e 7 H. 764, Masslngill v. Downs. 
 / 8 H. 397, Gibson v. Stevens. 
 ff 14 H. 508, Sheppard v. Graves. 
 b 21 H. 214, R. K. Co. v. Quigley. 
 7i28H. 27, Lawrence «. Tucker. 
 e 2 Bl. 437, Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 e 7 Wall. 217, Brown v. Pierce. 
 e 12 Wall. 158, Baker v. Morton. 
 i 14 Wall. 106, The Thames. 
 /16 Wall. 623, Crape v. Kelly. 
 6 22 Wall. 101, U. S. v. Ins. Co. 
 
 a 10 P. 610, Brent v. Bank, 
 ffi 12 P. 131, Beaston «. Bank. 
 6 12 P. 178, Clarke v. White. 
 
 CONARD V. PAC. INS. CO., 6 P. 268, 
 
 Priority of U. S. a 
 
 Trespass ; measure of damages. 6 
 
 Custom-house; who can enter 
 goods, c 
 
 Bankruptcy; suits by assignees 
 to recover property of bankrupt, d 
 
 b 14 P. 344, U. S. 
 
 V. Wiggins. 
 
 a 10 P. 596, Brent v. Bank. 
 
 6 5 Wall. 78, Watson v. Suther- 
 land. 
 
 c 8 Wall. 116, Waring ». The May- 
 or. 
 
 d 21 Wall. 339, Bank v. Jones. 
 
 632, Moultrie v. 
 49, Fairfield v. 
 tin Co. 
 
 Bank. 
 Galla- 
 
 CONCOBD V. SAVINGS BANK, 92 U. S. 625 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- a 92 U. S. 
 roads; donations; effect of new con- a 100 U. s! 
 stitution. a 
 
 CONDBY, SMITH v. See Smith v. Condry. 
 CONE, MOEBIM. V. See MoirUl v. Cone 
 CONFEDEBATE NOTE CASE, 19 WaU. 666. 
 
 Confederate money, a I a 91 U. S. 4, R. R. Co. v. King. 
 
 „,„„_,^„^ « ,,T^„ I as 94 U. S. 435, Stewart v. Salamon 
 
 CONFISCATION CASES, 7 WaU. 498. 
 
 Admiralty ; no j urisdiction where 
 seizure made on land, a 
 Confiscation, b. 
 
 CONFISCATION CASES, 20 WaU. 92 
 
 a 8 Wall. 511, Morris's Cotton. 
 a 16 Wall. 165, Garnharts v. U. S. 
 6 16 Wall. 431, U. S. v. Huckabee. 
 
 Confiscation, a 
 
 Who must prosecute to recover 
 forfeitiii-es. 6 
 
 a 91 U. S. 27, Semmes v. U. S. 
 a 94 U. S. 712, Pike v. Wassell. 
 a 99 U. S. 376, U. S. v. Winchester. 
 b 99 U. S. 597, Whiskev Ca=ips! 
 
 CONNECTICUT MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. SCHAEFEk, 94 U.T 4.tT 
 
 Insurance; insurable interest; 
 assignment of policy on one's own 
 life. .. a 
 
 a 94 U. S. 564, Ins. Co. v. France. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 69 
 
 CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK v. See New York v. Connecticut. 
 CONNECTICUT V. PENNSYLVANIA, 3 Wh. 424. 
 
 Supreme Court; appeals; testi- 
 
 mony must appear in recoi'd. a 
 
 CONNEM-Y V. TAYLOR, 3 P. 556. 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship; juris- 
 diction governed by condition at 
 commencement of suit, a 
 
 a 5 P. 449, New Orleans v. U. S. 
 a 92 U. S. 4, Blease v. Garlingtou. 
 
 a 7 P. 252, Vattier v. Hinde. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 574, Sewing Macli . Case. 
 
 CONNER V. BRADLEY, 1 H. 817. 
 
 Landlord's right of re-entry, a | a 15 Wall. 476, Prout v. Roby. 
 
 CONNER V. ELLIOTT, 18 H. 593. 
 
 Constitution ; taxation by States ; 
 discrimination ; " privileges and 
 immunities." a 
 
 a 12 Wall. 430, Ward v. Marvland. 
 a 94 U. S. 395, McCready v.' Vir- 
 ginia. 
 
 CONRAD, FORGAY v. See Forgay v. Oonrad. 
 CONRAD T. GRIITEY, 11 H. 493. 
 
 Evidence; letters corroborating, a ( a 16 H. 45, Conrad v. Griffey. 
 
 CONRAD V. WAPUES, 96 U. S. 379. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 292, Burbank v. Conrad. 
 6 98 U. S. 497, Airhart v, Massieu. 
 
 Confiscation . a 
 
 Conveyances of property in ene- 
 my's country during war. 6 
 
 CONSEDENE, DOE v. See Doe v. Consedine. 
 
 CONSEDINE, POOR v. See Poor v. Consedine. 
 
 CONTINENTAL, THE, 14 WaU. 355. 
 
 Collision ; damages; when divi- I a 91 U. S. 216, The Sunnvside. 
 ded. a | a 93 U. S. 319, The Atlas. 
 
 CONTERSE V. FORT SCOTT, 93 U. S. 603. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 514, Randolph Co. v. 
 
 Post. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 342, U. S. v. Shoemaker. 
 a 91 U. S. 565, Hall v. U. S. 
 6 97 U. S. 592, Gaussen v. U. S. 
 
 Municipal aid of railroads ; reci- 
 tals; estoppel; bonds in bona-flde 
 holders, a 
 
 CONVERSE T. U. S., 31 H. 478. 
 
 Public officers ; extra compensa- 
 tion ; act of 1839. (5 St. 349.) a 
 
 Official bonds; change in duties 
 of ofHce ; sureties; liability. 6 
 
 CONWAY v. ALEXANDER, 7 Cr. 338. 
 
 Mortgages and sales; parol evi- I a 12 H. 145, Russell v. Southard, 
 dence. a I a 19 H. 293, Babcock v. Wyman. 
 
 COOK V. BURNLEY, 11 WaU. 676. 
 
 Supreme Court; final decrees, a | a 13 Wall. 188, Wells v. McGregor. 
 
 COOK, GREENXEAF v. See Greenleaf v. Cook. 
 COOK V. MOFFAT, 5 H. 316. 
 
 Constitution ; validity of State 
 insolvent laws, a 
 Contracts ; law regulating. 6 
 
 COOK V. PENTfSYLVANIA, 97 U. S. 
 
 Constitution ; tax on imports, a 
 
 a 6 H. 318, Bank v. Sharp. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 231, Baldwin «. Hale. 
 
 6 99 U. S. 218, Super, v. Galbraith. 
 
 566. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 679, Mach. Co. v. Gage. 
 
70 
 
 MANUAL OiP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 COOK v. Tn-ilS, 18 Wall. 338. 
 
 Bankruptcy; fraudulent prefer- 
 ences, a 
 Assignee takes subject to liens. 6 
 
 COOK, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Oook. 
 COOKE T. GKAHAM, 3 Cr. 889. 
 
 Demurrers; judgment given 
 against party whose pleading is 
 first defective, a 
 
 COOKE V. WOOBBOW, 5 Cr. 13. 
 
 Supreme Court; amount in con- 
 troversy ; in actions for damages, a 
 
 a 21 Wall. 369, Clark v. Isilin. 
 a 21 Wall. 4S0, Fox v. Gardner. 
 a 22 Wall. 178, Burnhisel v. Fir- 
 man. 
 a 91 U. S. 121, Sawyer v. Turpin. 
 6 95 U. S. 766, Yea'tman v. Inst. 
 b 96 U. H. 487, Casey v. Cavaroc. 
 6 101 U. S. 739, Stewart v. Piatt. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 93, Aurora v. West. 
 
 a 9 Wh. 527, Pevton v. Robertson. 
 a 3 P. 33, Gordon ». Ogden. 
 a 16 P. 327, Fresh v. Gibson. 
 a 4 Wall. 164, Walker v. XJ. S. 
 
 COOKENDOKFEK t. PKESTON, 4 H. 317. 
 
 Usages of banks; days of grace, a | a 15 H. 544, Adams ».. Otterback. 
 
 COOI.ET V. BOARD OF WARDENS, 18 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce; what laws on the subject 
 tlie States may pass, a 
 
 Pilotage. 6 
 
 Wharfage, c 
 
 H. 899. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 635, Conway v. Taylor. 
 b 2 Wall. 457, St'msliip v. Joliffo. 
 a 3 Wall. 727, Gilman v. Phila. 
 a 6 Wall. 42, Crandell v Nevada 
 a 8 Wall. 152, Hinson v. Lott. 
 a 12 Wall. 219, St. Ton. Tax Cas. 
 a 13 Wall. 242, exparte McNeil. 
 a 15 Wall. 280, St.Frg'htTaxCas. 
 a 16 Wall, 482, Osborne v. Mobile. 
 a 17 Wall. 569, E. R. Co. ». Fuller. 
 b 21 Wall. 582, The Lottowanna. 
 a 92 U. S. 272, Hend'son ». Mayor 
 c 95 U. S. 88, Packet v. Keokuk. 
 a 95 D. S. 462, Pound v. Turk. 
 6 95 U. S. 488, Hall v. DeCuir. 
 a 100 U. S. 385, exparte Siebold. 
 6 102 U. S. 575, Wilson «McNamee 
 6 102 U. S. 698, Mobile v. Kimball. 
 
 COOLEY V. O'CONNEB, 18 Wall. 391. 
 
 Tax sales by the U. S. ujidej- laws I a 98 U. S. 523, DeTreville v. Smalls- 
 levying direct taxes, a ' 
 
 COOLIDGE, BIRDSAIX v. 
 
 COOrrOGE, INGLE V. See Ingle v. Coolidge. 
 
 COOLIDGE T. PAYSON, 8 Wli. 75. 
 
 See Birdsall v. Ooolidge. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; acceptance, a 
 Collateral security ; rights of 
 holder. 6 
 
 m 4 P. Ill, Boyce v. Henry. 
 b 16 P. 14, Swift V. Tyson. 
 
 COOLEDGE, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Coolidge. 
 COOaiBB, BARRY v. See Barry v. Ooorabe. 
 COOMBS, TJ. S. V. See U. S. v. Coombs. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 71 
 
 a 5 H. 374, Scott u. Jones. 
 a 7 H. 740, Smith ». Hunter, 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 COONS V. GATiAGEK, 15 P. 18. 
 
 Writs of error to State court ; 
 how jurisdiction must appear; Fed- 
 eral question, a 
 
 See Laber v. Cooper. 
 See Mayor v. 'Cooper. 
 COOPER V. OMAHCNDKO, 19 Wall. 69. 
 
 Findings of facts ; act of 1S65. a | ft 21 Wall. 161, Ins. Co. v. Sea. 
 
 COOPER V. REYNOLDS, 10 WaU. 316. 
 
 COOPER, LABEB v. 
 COOPER, MJVYOR V, 
 
 Jurisdiction ; when judgments 
 cannot be questioned ; collateral- 
 ly, a 
 
 Judgments on pnblication. 6 
 
 a 11 Wall. 344, Tyler v. Defrees. 
 a 11 Wall. 687, Ludlow v. Ramse}-. 
 a 23 Wall. 463, The Rio Graiulc. 
 a 94 U. S. 669, Gunn v. Plant. 
 b 95 U. S. 724, Pennoyer u. Neff. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 250, Holden v. Joy. 
 
 6 95 U. S. 524, Beecheru Wetherby 
 
 COOPER V. ROBERTS, 18 H. 181. 
 
 Conditions subsequent, a 
 
 Land grants to the States ; when 
 title vests ; survey. 6 
 COOPER, ROBERTS v. See Roberts v. Cooper. 
 COOPER, SHAW V. See Shaw •!;. Cooper. 
 COOPER V. TEIFAJR, 4 Dall. 14. 
 
 Statutes; construction, a | a 4 H. 51, Beals u. Hale 
 
 COOPER, WEBSTER v. See Webster v. Cooper. 
 COPELIN V. LNS. CO., 9 WaU. 461. 
 
 Trial without jury; finding of 
 facts; review of, by Supreme 
 Court, a 
 
 COPPELI, V. HAII/, 7 WaU. 558. 
 
 Civil war ; intercourse, a 
 
 Contracts; illegality; agreements 
 for use of improper influence with 
 officers. 6 
 
 a 18 AVall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 a 21 Wall. 161, Ins. Co. v. Sea. 
 a 98 U. S. 443, The Abbotsford. 
 
 CORBETT T. NUTT, 10 W^aU. 464. 
 
 Extraterritorial effect of laws, a 
 
 Civil war; transfer of property 
 during; confiscation, b. 
 
 Tax sales ; redemption, c 
 CORCORAN, BANK TJ. S. v. See Bank U. S. a. Corcoran. 
 CORCORAN, JUDSON v. See Judson v. Corcoran. 
 COBDES, NIAGARA v. See Niagara v. Cordes. 
 CORNETT v. WILLIAMS, 80 W^aU. 350. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a. 
 
 Acts in aid of the rebellion void, b 
 
 a 17 Wall. 439, Lasere v. Eoche- 
 
 reau. 
 a 21 Wall. 96, Hamilton b. Dillon 
 a 21 Wall. 353, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 b 101 U. S. Ill, Meguireu.Corwine 
 
 a 95 U. S. 723, Pennoyer v. Neff. 
 b 96 U. S. 288, Conrad «. Waples. 
 c 102 U. S. 657, Barrett v. Holmes. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 
 6 96 U. S. 
 
 Mc- 
 
 a 100 U. S. 
 
 CORNING V. BURDEN, 15 H. 865. 
 
 Patent law ;■ specification ; con- 
 struction of. a 
 
 Evidence ; infi-ingement. 6 
 
 Patents should be construed lib- 
 erally, c 
 
 Paitents for processes, d 
 
 283, Windsor v. 
 
 Veigh. 
 195, Dewing v. Perdi- 
 
 caries. 
 23, ex parte Keed. 
 
 a 15 H. 338, Winans v. Denmead. 
 
 6 8 Wall. 425, Blanchard v. Put- 
 nam. 
 
 c 9 Wall. 795, Rubber Co. v. 
 Goodyear. 
 
 d 102 U. S. 772, Tilghman u. Proc- 
 tor. 
 
72 MANUAL OF SUPKEME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 CORNING, XROT IRON CO. v. See Troy Iron Co. o. Coming. 
 CORNING V. TROY IRON CO., 15 H. 466. 
 
 Supreme Court; mandate; sec- I a 20 H. 481, Boberts v. Cooper, 
 ond writ of error, a ) a 17 Wall. 284, Tyler v. Magwire, 
 
 COTTON V. V. S., 11 H. 239. 
 
 U. S. ; control over the public I a 19 Wall. 594, U. S. v. Cook, 
 lands; action for cutting timber, a \ 
 COTTON, WALTON v. See Walton v. Cotton. 
 COUIiSON V. "WAITON, 9 P. 68. 
 
 Equity; lapse of time, a | a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 
 COTJIiTBR, PATAPSCO INS. CO. v. See Patapsco Ins. Co. «. Coulter. 
 COUNTY COM'RS, LAMBORN v. See Lambom v. County ComTs. 
 COUPREY, DDTAU v. See Dufau v. Conprey. 
 COURSE V. STEAD, 4 DaU. 88. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter | a 21 H. 392, Richmond v. Milwaukee 
 in dispute ; affidavits, a \ 
 
 COURSE, STEAD v. See Stead v. Course. 
 COURTNEY, CLARKE v. See Clarke v. Courtney. 
 COUSIN V. BLANC, 19 H. 803. 
 
 Louisiana land titles; registers 
 and receivers, a, 
 
 Supreme Court ; opinions of Su- 
 preme Court of Louisiana parts of 
 
 a 24 H. 361, Tate v. Carney. 
 6 14 Wall. 667, Delraas v. Ins. Co. 
 6 20 Wall. 633, Murdock v. Mera- 
 pliis. 
 
 the record. 6 | 6 21 Wall. 639, Moore u. Mississippi 
 
 COVINGTON DRAWBRIDGE CO. v. SHEPHERD, 80 H. 831. 
 
 U. S. courts; corporations; citi- 
 zenship, a 
 
 Receivers; at suit of judgment 
 creditors. 6 
 
 a 21 H. 122, Bridge Co. v. Shepherd 
 6 21 H. 419, Canal Co. v. Vallette. 
 a 1 Bl. 295, R. B. Co. v. Wheeler. 
 a 8 Wall. 178, Paul v. Virginia. 
 a 18 Wall. 575, Sewing Mach. Case. 
 
 COVINGTON DRAWBRIDGE CO. v. SHEPHERD, 81 H. 188. 
 
 Railroads; sale under decree; 1 a 6 Wall. 752, B. R. Co. b. James, 
 title of purchaser, a | 
 
 COWAN, SHEPLEY v. See Shepley v. Cowan. 
 
 COWDREY, GALVESTON R. R. CO. v. See Galveston B. B. Co. v. Cowdrey. 
 
 COWELL V. SPRINGS CO., 100 U. S. 55. 
 
 Corporations; powers in State I a 101 U. S. 356, Christian Union u. 
 other than tliat where cliartered. a I Youiit. 
 
 COWLES V. MERCER CO., ■? Wall. 181. 
 
 U. S. courts ; .suits by coi'pora- | a 20 Wall. 454, Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 tions; citizensliip. a \ 
 
 cox, Mcpherson v, see McPherson 1). Cox. 
 cox, PENNINGTON v. See Pennington v. Cox. 
 COX & DICK T. U. 8., 6 P. 198. 
 
 Official bonds ; by what law gov- 
 erned, a 
 Supreme Court; writ of error; 
 
 joint judgment. 6 
 
 Treasury accounts ; riglits of 
 sureties, "c 
 ' Treasury transcripts, d • 
 
 a 7 P. 445, Duncan v. U. S. 
 a 10 P. 129, U. S. V. Hawkins. 
 6 16 P. 522, Todd v. Daniel. 
 c 17 H, 431, Bruce v. U. S. 
 a 19 H. 392, Buckley v. Honald. 
 6 20 Wall. 157, Simpson v Greeley 
 d 100 U. S. 11, Soule v. U. S. 
 cE102 U. S. 554, U. S. u. Pinson. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 73 
 
 CdXE, McHVAINB v. See Mcllvaine v. Coxe. 
 COXE, MACKEX v. See Mackey v. Coxe. 
 COXE, WHEY V. See Wiley v. Coxe. 
 COY V. MASON, 17 H. 580. 
 
 Equity ; parties, a | a 16 Wall. 451, Riboii v. R. R. Co 
 
 COYNE, BENTUEY v. See Bentley v. Coyne. 
 CRAIG v. lESLIE, S Wli. 577. 
 
 Powei's coupled with an inter 
 
 est. a 
 
 Aliens ; devise to citizen as 
 trustee of. 6 
 
 Wills; equitable conversion, c 
 
 CKAIG V. anSSOTIRI, 4 p. 410. 
 
 Supreme Court ; \\'nt of error to 
 State court ; record ; must show 
 Federal que.'Stion. a 
 Constitution ; bills of credit. 6 
 Error ; bills of exception ; effect 
 of admission of improper evidence 
 when case is tried by the court on 
 waiver of jnry. c 
 
 a 10 P. 534, Peter v. Beverly. 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 6 12 H. 102, Neilson v. Lagow. 
 c 19 Wall. 174, Cropley v. Cooper. 
 
 a 5 P. 252, Fisher v. Cockrell. 
 
 a 6 P. 47, Davis v. Packard. 
 
 6 8 P. 40, Byrne v. Missouri. 
 
 a 10 P. 368, Crovvell v. Randell. 
 
 6 11 P. 311, Briscoe v. Bank. 
 
 a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island u. Mass. 
 
 c 13 H. 195, Weems v. George. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 203, Magwire v. Tyler. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 384, Tlie Victory. 
 
 c 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 CRAIG, -WALDEN v. See Walden v. Craig. 
 CRAIGSHEAD V. WTLSON, 18 H. 199. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a \a2 Wall. 110, Huraiston o. Stain- 
 
 I thorp. 
 
 CRANDELL V. NEVADA, 6 WaU. 35. 
 
 Constitution ; State restrictions 
 on freedom of transit, a 
 
 Regulation of commerce. 6 
 
 "Privileges and immunities " of 
 citizens, c 
 
 Concurrent powers, d 
 
 CRANE, EX PARTE, 5 P. 191. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandamus, a 
 
 CRANE V. MORRIS, 6 P. 598. 
 
 When possession of deed evi- 
 dence of delivery; prima-facie evi- 
 dence ; execution of deed, a 
 
 Nonsuits. 6 
 
 Recitals in deed ; when evidence, c 
 
 Par- 
 
 8 Wall. 138, Woodruff v. 
 
 ham. 
 8 Wall. 152, Hinson v. Lott. 
 
 15 Wall. 280, St. Fr. Tax Case. 
 
 16 Wall. 79, Slaughter-Ho u s e 
 
 21 Wall. 472, R. R^ Co. v. Md. 
 92 U. S. 272, Hend'sonu. Mayor 
 94 U. S. 541, Doyle v. Ins. Co. 
 S. 463, Pound v. Turk. 
 S. 571. Cook V. Penn. 
 d 102 U. S. 701, Mobile Co. v. Kim- 
 ball. 
 
 95 U. 
 97 U. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 375, ex parte Bradley. 
 a 14 Wall. 170, ex parte Newman. 
 
 a 6 P. 622, Kelly v. Jackson. 
 b 14 H. 219, Silsby v. Foote. 
 6 23 H. 183, Castle v. Bullard. 
 b 1 Wall. 369, Sohuchardtt;. Allen 
 c 5 Wall. 805, Deery v. Cray. 
 a 97 U. S. 268, Lilienthal's Tobac- 
 co. 
 
 CRATVrORD, BliACKBURN v. See Blackburn v. Crawford, 
 CRAWFORD, COMSTOCK v. See Oomstook v. Crawford. 
 
74' 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 CEATFFOBD, KEM,Y v. See Kelly v. Crawford. 
 CRAWTOBD V. POINTS, 13 H. 11. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 
 CRAY, DEEBY v. See Deery v. Cray. 
 CBEATH V. SIMS, 5 H. 804. 
 
 Equity ; rescission ; illegality ; re- 
 lief whei-e parties are in pari de- 
 lictu. a 
 
 Jurisdiction ; i-emedy at law. 6 
 
 Enjoining judgments, c 
 
 Laches, d 
 
 a 2 "Wall. 110, Humistcm v. Stain-- 
 thorp. 
 
 CBEIGHTON, GEEBN v. See Green v. Creighton 
 CBENSHAW, EX PARTE, 15 P. 183. 
 
 Judgments; amendments, a 
 
 CEEWS V. BREWER, 19 WaU. 70. 
 
 Finding of facts ; act of 1865. a 
 
 CREWS T. BURCHAM, 1 Bi. 356. 
 
 Treaties, a 
 CROCKER, NOKRIS v. Se6 Norris v. Crocker. 
 CROCKETT V. LEE, 7 Wh. 585. 
 
 Equity ; relief must correspond 
 to frame of bill. 
 
 a 14 H. 71, Sample v. Barnes. 
 6 14 H. 584, Walker v. Bobbins. 
 e 17 H. 445, Hendrickson v. Hiiik- 
 
 iHy. 
 c 94 U. S. 658, Crim v. Handley. 
 d 95 U. S. 161, Brown v. B u e n a 
 Vista. 
 
 a 6 H. 36, Bank of U. S. v. Moss. 
 a 21 Wal'l^ 161, Ins. Co. v, Sea. 
 a 17 Wall. 247, Holden v. Joy. 
 
 a 
 
 CROCKETT V. Newton, is h. ssi. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 Collision; sailing vessels and 
 steamers, b 
 
 CROFT, MYERS v. See Myers v. Croft. 
 
 CEOMMELm, MINTURN t. See Mlnturin.. Crommelin. 
 
 CROMWELL V. SAC, 94 V. S. 3S1. 
 
 Judgment; when estoppel, a 
 Interest after maturity of obliga- 
 tion. 6 
 
 a 19 H. 126, Baker v. Kaohtrieb. 
 a 1 WalU 165, Jones v. Moreliead. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 304, Haveraeyer v. Iowa 
 6 91 U. S. 223, The Sunuvside. 
 b 91 U. S. 697, The Colorado. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 429, Davis v. Brown. 
 a 99 U.S. 263, Campbell u.Eankin 
 6 100 U. S. 74, Holden v. Trust Co. 
 al01U.S.639,Lumber Co. v. 
 Buchtel. 
 
 CROMWELL V. SAC CO., 96 V. S. 61. 
 
 Coupons ; interest on. a | « 96 U. S. 631, Brine v. Ins Co 
 
 CROSBY, UNITED STATES v. See United States .. Crosbi.. 
 CROSS V. DE VALLE, 1 WaU. 8. 
 
 Aliens ; when they can hold prop- 
 erty, a 
 Cross-bills. 6 
 
 CROSS, DRURY V. See Drury v. Cross 
 CROSS V. HARRISON, 16 H. 164. 
 
 War; eflect of military occupa- 
 tion, a - r 
 
 Powers of the President, b 
 
 a 6 Wall. 122, Osterman v. Bald- 
 win. 
 6 9 Wall. 809, Rubber Co. v. 
 t n- TT r, Goodyear. 
 
 , 1^? H- ^- ^25' e^P'^rte R. R. Co. 
 b 101 U. S. 641, E. E. Co. v. U. S. 
 
 " on ^""II- ^^^' '■^''"- Gi-apeshot. 
 a 20 Wall. 394, N. Or. v.S S Co 
 6 21 Wall. 87, Hamilton «DiUon. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 75 
 
 CROSS, liAAV V. See I^aw v. Cross. 
 CKOUDSON V. liEONARD, 4 Cr. 434. 
 
 Aclmiialtj'; sentences in rem. a | a 9 Ci-. 126, The Maiy. 
 
 CROWELL, V. McFADDEN, 8 Cr. 94. 
 
 Public officers ; suits against, a 
 
 CROWEIX V. RANDELL, 10 P. 391. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State courts ; iiow the inrisdictioii 
 must appear ; Federal question, a 
 
 a 9 Cr, 353, Otis v. Watlcins. 
 
 a 12 P. 66, McKinley v. Carroll. 
 
 a 12 P. 103, Beaston v. Banlv. 
 
 a 12 P. 507, Chouteau v Marguerite 
 
 a 13 P. 156, Reed v. Marsh. 
 
 a 14 P. 579, Holmes v. .Jennison. 
 
 a 15 P. 18, Coons v. Gallager. 
 
 a 7 H. 590, Kennedy v. Hunt. 
 
 a 7 H. 740, Smitli v. Hunter. 
 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 a 12 H. 119, Williams v. Oliver. 
 
 a 14 H. 152, Lawler v. Walker. 
 
 a 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas. 
 
 o 18 H. 512, Maxwell v. Newbold. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 142, Bridge Prop. v. Ho- 
 boken. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 384, The Victory. 
 
 o 13 Wall. 263, Klingeru. Missouri. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 21, Steins v. Franklin. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 86, Hurley v. Street. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 189, Smith v. Adsit. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 628, Murdock v. . Mem- 
 phis. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 558. Edwards v. Elliott. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 412, Murray v. Charles- 
 ton. 
 
 CROWTfCN SHTEUJ, STURGES v. See Sturges v. Crowninshield. 
 CROXAIX V. SHEREBD, 5 'WaU. »80. 
 
 Contingent remainders, a 
 
 Cui-ative and private statutes; 
 validity of. 6. 
 
 Vendor and vendee ; when there 
 is no estoppel to deny title, a 
 
 Equity; same rules in general 
 applied to equitable estates as are 
 applied at law to legal estates, d 
 
 Statute of limitations; remain- 
 dermen, e 
 
 a 6 Wall. 478, Doe v. Considine. 
 6 7 Wall. 624, Beloit v. Morgan, 
 c 9 Wall. 600, Merryman v. 
 
 Bourne, 
 c 12 Wall. 338, VillatJ.Eodriguez. 
 d 16 Wall. 229, Davis v. Gray. 
 a 23 Wall. 491, Green v. Green. 
 d 95 U. S. 18, New Orleans v. 
 Montgomery. 
 
 S. 312, Oukl V. Hospital. 
 
 S. 570, Meeks v. Olpherts . 
 
 d 95 U. 
 
 e 100 U. 
 
 CRnKSHAUK, V. S. v. See U. S. v. Oruikshank. 
 CRUSEll, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Crusell. 
 CRUZ CERVANTES, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Cruz Cervantes. 
 CUIBERTSON v. SHA-VT, 18 H. 684. 
 
 Collision; lights; watch, a I a 14 Wall. 119, The Bridgeport 
 ' ^ ' I rt 102 U. S. 203, The Clara. 
 
 CUIiliOM, OTIS V. See Otis v. Cullom. 
 CCMMINGS V. MISSOURI, 4 WaU. 316. 
 
 Constitution ; bills of attainder ; 
 ex post facto laws, a 
 Test oath . b 
 
 a 4 Wall. 377, ex parte Garland. 
 a 9 Wall. 38, Gut v. The State. 
 6 13 Wall. 261, Klingerw. Missouri. 
 a 16 Wall. 239, Pierce v. Carskadon 
 a 97 U. S. 385, Burgess v. Salmon. 
 
76 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 eUMMINGS V. NATIONAL BANK, 101 TJ. S. 153. 
 
 National banks ; State taxation ; I a 101 U. S. 148, Pelton v. Nat. B'k. 
 injunction to restrain, a I 
 
 CUNNINGHAM T. ASHLEY, 14 H. 318. 
 
 Land office; when its iurisdic- 
 
 tion is exclusive, a 
 Void cancellation of entry. & 
 Equity will enforce equities 
 
 against holder of patent, c 
 
 CUKRAN T. ABKANSAS, 15 H. 304. 
 
 Corporations; effect of dissolu- 
 tion by the legislature on its debts ; 
 power of courts of equity, a 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; assets of banks ; control of 
 legislature over; creditors. 6 
 
 Kight to sue a State, c 
 
 Capital stock trust fund for cred- 
 itors, d 
 
 CtTBKY, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Curry. 
 
 CUBTENIUS, MORGAN v. See Morgan v. Ourtenius. 
 
 CUKXIS V. BUTLEK CO., 84 H. 445. 
 
 ^ County bonds; subscription to 
 railroad ; bonds negotiable ; condi- 
 tions; bona-fldo holders, a 
 CUKXIS, CAKT V. See Curtis v. Cary. 
 CUKXIS v. FIELDLER, « Bl. 474. 
 
 Collectors; suit to recover back 
 taxes illegally exacted, a 
 
 Voluntarj- payment. 6 
 
 When the law will imply a prom- 
 ise to pay; "indebitatus assump- 
 sit." c 
 
 a 20 H. 7, Garland v. Wynn. 
 a 22 H. 202, Lytle v. Arkansas. 
 6 1 Bl. 139, O'Brien v. Perry. 
 a 2 Bl. 537, Lindsey v. Hawes. 
 c 13 Wall. 102, Gibson u. Chouteau. 
 
 a 18 H. 480, Bacon v. Kobertson. 
 b 2 Wall. 21,Hawtiiorneu.Calef 
 a 7 Wall. 410, E. R. «. Howard, 
 c 16 Wall. 221, Davis v. Gray. 
 d 17 Wall. 621, Sawyer v. Hoag. 
 6 19 Wall. 9, Barings J). Dabaey. 
 d 91 U. S. 61, Sanger v. Upton. 
 d 92 U. S. 368, Scammon v. Kim- 
 ball. 
 a 95 U. S. 324, Shields v. Ohio. 
 a 95 XT. S. 687, Farringtonc.Tenn. 
 6 100 U. S. 556, Newton v. Com'rs. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 404, Woods v. Lawrence Co. 
 
 CUKXIS V. MAKXIN, 3 H. 106. 
 
 Duties; suits against collectors, a 
 Whether article imported is 
 
 known by name given in tariff, a 
 
 question for the jury. 6 
 
 a 5 Wall. 732, Pliila. v. Collector. 
 6 7 Wall. 128, Nichols v. U. S. 
 a 12 Wall. 13, CoU'r v. Hubbard, 
 c 13 Wall. 630, U. S. v. Russell; 
 c 17 Wall. 141, Goddard v. Poster. 
 a 22 Wall. 639, Bailey v. R. R. Co. 
 a 96 U. S. 149, Davies v. Arthur. 
 
 a 4 H. 331, Rankin v. Hoyt. 
 6 7 H. 790, Lawrence v. Allen. 
 6 91 U. S. 363, Arthur v. Cumming 
 
 5 92 U. S. 470, Tyng v. Grinnell. 
 
 6 96 U. S. Ill, Arthur v. Morrison. 
 CURTIS, SIKAWBRIDGE v. See Strawbridge v. Curtis. 
 
 CURTIS V. WHITNEY, 13 Wall. 68. 
 
 Tax sales ; redemption, a | a 102 U. S. 657, Barrett u. Holmes. 
 
 CUSTARD, GREEN v. See Oreen v. Custard. 
 CUSTIS V. GEORGETOWN & ALEX. XUNRNPIKE CO., 6 Cr. SSS. 
 
 District of Columbia ; courts of. a 
 Supreme Court; appellate juris- 
 diction. 6 
 
 CUTLER, RAE V. See Eae -o. Cutler. 
 CUTNEB V. U. S., 17 Wall. 516. 
 
 Civil war ; intercourse, a 
 
 a 12 P. 608, Kendall v. U. S. 
 
 b 19 Wall. 64, R. R. Co. v. Church. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 352, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 77 
 
 a 19 H. 276, Hipp v. Babin. 
 a 2 Bl. 551, Parker v. Cotton Co. 
 a 7 Wall. 61S, Morgan v. Beloit. 
 a 15 Wall. 228, Oelriohs v. Spain. 
 
 CUTTING, CARTER v. See Carter v. Cutting. 
 CUTirSfG, tJ. S. V. See U. S. Catting. ' 
 DADE V. IRWTN, S H. 389. 
 
 Equity ; no junsdiotion wliere 
 remedy complete at law ; objection 
 to the want of iuriscliction can be 
 taken by the court, a 
 D'AGUIRKB, TJ. S. v. See U. S. v. D'Agulrre. 
 DAIR V. TJ. S., 16 Wall. 1. 
 
 U. S. ; official bonds ; sureties, a | a 21 Wall. 274, Butler v. U. S. 
 
 DAXT V. JAMES, 8 ■WTi. 535. 
 
 U. S. courts ; force of State de- I a 12 Wh. 164, Jackson v. Chew, 
 cisions. a \ 
 
 DAXTON, BANK OF AXABAMA v. See Banli of Alabama u. Dalton. 
 DANDELET v. SMITH, 18 Wall. 647. 
 
 Internal revenue ; distillers, a | a 95 U. S. 310, BergdoUw. Pollock. 
 DANDRIDGE, BANK OF THE TJ. S. v. See Banlc of the U. S. v. Dandridge. 
 DANDKIDGE v. W^ASHINGTON, 2 P. 378. 
 
 Equity ; dismissal of bill without | a 7 Wall. 110, Durant v. Essex Co. 
 prejudice, a I 
 
 DANFOKTH v. THOMAS, 1 Wh. 155. 
 
 a 9 Wh. 673, Dauforth v. Ware. 
 6 12 P. 714, Khode Island v. Mass. 
 
 a 2 P. 225, Patterson v. Jenks. 
 6 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 a 15 P. 80, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 
 Land grants ; when they must be 
 by statute, a 
 Boundaries between States. 6 
 
 DANFOBTH v. WEAR, 9 Wb. 673. 
 
 Indians ; grant of Indian land 
 void, a 
 
 Boundary between l^orth Caro- 
 lina and tlie Cherokees. 6 
 DANTEl, TODD v. See Todd v: Daniel. 
 DANIEI., TJ. S. V. See U. S. v. Daniel. 
 DANIEIi V. -WHARTENBY, 17 WaU. 640. 
 
 Contingent remainders, a | a 23 Wall. 491, Green v. Green 
 
 DANIEL, W^ELSON v. See Wilson v. Daniel. 
 DANIEI. BAXL, THE, 10 TVaU. 562. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; navigable I a 11 Wall. 415, The Montello. 
 waters, a | a 20 Wall. 439, The Montello. 
 
 DANIELS, BANK TJ. S. v. See Bank U. S. v. Daniels. 
 DANNBBY, McDONOTJGH v. See McDonough. v. Dannery. 
 DAJBBT, EDWARDS v. See Edwards i). Darby. 
 D'ABCY V. KETCHTJM, 11 H. 165. 
 
 Constitution ; judgments ; faith 
 and credit to be given to. a 
 
 U.S. courts; jurisdiction where 
 some of the parties cannot be serv- 
 ed ; act 28th February, 1839. (5 
 St. 32.) b 
 
 Judgments without notice. 
 By attachment, d 
 Extraterritorial effect, e 
 
 a 18 H. 405, Ins. Co. v. French. 
 
 6 1 Bl. 571, Inbush v. Farwell. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 300, Christmas uKussell 
 
 c 6 Wall. 239, Mason v. Eldred. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 123, Cheever v. U. S. 
 
 d 9 Wall. 810, Rubber Co. v. Good- 
 year. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 528, Pub. Works v. Col. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 464, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 428, Michaels «. Post. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 169, Hall v. Lannlng. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 661, Lamp Co. v. Brass 
 Co. 
 
 e 95 U. S. 720, Pennoyer v. Neff. 
 
78 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 DARtING, LEWIS v. See Lewis v. Darlings 
 DAKIINGTON, EMPIRE T. See Empire v. Darlington. 
 DARiyAI.1., I.AGRAND v. See Lagrand v. Darnall. 
 DARRTNGTON v. BANE OF ALABAMA, 13 H. 13. 
 
 a 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas. 
 
 State by becoming interested in 
 capital stoclcof corporation does not 
 impart to corporation any of its 
 privileges ; bills of credit, a 
 
 DARST, DUNCAN v. See Duncan v. Darst. 
 
 DARTMOUTH COLI/EGE T. WOODTVARD, 4 Wh. 518. 
 
 The Eevolntion made no change 
 in property rights, a 
 
 Constitntion ; obligation of con- 
 tracts, b 
 
 State cannot take away a fran- 
 chise, c 
 
 Power to declare a statute of the 
 State unconstitutional, d 
 
 Natni-e of corporations, and pow- 
 ers, e 
 
 Grant to corpoi-ation to be cre- 
 ated ; public and piivate corpora- 
 tions ; power of State ovei-. / 
 
 What are public corporations, g 
 
 Perpetuities, h 
 
 New 
 
 a 8 Wh. 464, Society «. 
 Haven. 
 
 6 12 Wh. 213, Ogdeii v. Saunders. 
 
 c 6 P..706, U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 
 d 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 e 13 P. 584, Bank v. Earle. 
 
 e 2 H. 5.50, E. B. Co. K.Letson. 
 
 b 6 H. 330, Plant. Bank v. Sharp. 
 
 e 9 H. 177, Perrine v. Canal Co. 
 
 c 10 H. 532, East Hartford v. Hart- 
 ford Bridge Co. 
 
 /14 H. 271, TJniversitv v. Indiana. 
 
 a 16 H. 376, Bank v. Knoop. 
 
 b 22 H. 377, Aspin wall v. Daviess. 
 
 c 3 Wall. 73, Bingliamroii Bridge 
 
 e 6 Wall. 606, Soc. forSav. v. Coit. 
 
 c 8 Wall. 437, Home of Friendless 
 V. House. 
 
 c 13 Wall. 212, Pa. College Cases. 
 
 c 15 Wall. 493, Miller v. State. 
 
 c 15 Wall. 511, Holyoke Co. v. Ly- 
 man. 
 
 c 16 Wall. 232, Davis v. Gray. 
 
 6 16 Wall. 249, Humphrey v. Pe- 
 gues. 
 
 c 18 Wall. 225, Delaw'e R. R. Tax. 
 
 7j95 U. S. 312, Ould «. Hospital. 
 
 b 95 U. S. 983, Farrington«.Teini. 
 
 6 96 U. S. 607, Edwards!;. Kearsey 
 
 6 100 U. S. 557, Newton v. Com'rs. 
 
 /lOI U. S. 539, R'y Co. v. Phil'a. 
 
 6 101 U. S. 816, Ston(; v. Mississippi 
 DASHIEL, U. S. V. See U. S. i). Dashiel. 
 DAUCHY, WISCART t. See Wiseart v. Danohr. 
 D'AUTERIVE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. D'Auterive. 
 DAVENPORT, EX PARTE, 6 P. 663. 
 
 Pleading; inconsistent and double I a 15 Wall, 
 pleas, a 
 
 DAVENPORT v. EliETCHER, 16 H. 168. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error ; 
 defects in ; dismissal, a 
 Joint decrees ; severance. 6 
 
 370, 
 
 Grand Chute 
 Winegar. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 86, The Protector. 
 
 6 20 Wall. 158, Simpson v. Greeley. 
 
 DAVENPORT, FOSTER t. See Foster v. Davenport. 
 
MANUAL OF STJPUEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 79 
 
 DAVENPORT v. I.AMB, IS 'Wall. 418. 
 
 Land titles; right of pve-emptor I a 18 Wall. 314, Lamb u. Davenport, 
 to sell before acquiring title, a | 
 DAVENPORT, LAMB v. See Lamb v. Davenport. 
 DAVEITPORX, SINNOT v. See Sinnot v. Davenport. 
 DAVENPORT, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Davenport. 
 DAVIDSON V. I.ANIER, 4 VTall. 447. 
 
 Supreme Court; appeal bonds; I a 102 U. S. 162, Seward u. Corneau. 
 security for costs ; dismissal, a I 
 DAVIDSON, UDELL v. See Udell v. Davidson. 
 DAV^E V. BRIGGS, 97 V. S. 688. 
 
 of the 
 limita- 
 
 U. S. courts; decisions 
 State courts ; force of ; 
 tions. a 
 DAVEES V. ARTHUR, 96 fr. S. 148. 
 
 Kevenue ; designation of articles 
 in iarift"la\vs. a 
 
 Recovery back of duties; pro- 
 test. 6 
 
 DAVIES, G.iRLAND v. See Garland 
 DA\T;ESS v. FAIRBAIRN, S H. 643 
 
 Statutes ; repeal by implication . a 
 
 a 98 U. S. 471, Amy v. Dubuque. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 367, Arthur v. Moller. 
 6 101 TI. 8. 37, Arthur v. Dodge. 
 6 101 U. S. 179, Wright v. Black- 
 erslee. 
 
 '. Davies. 
 
 DAVIESS CO., ASPINWAXLv 
 DAVIS, THE, 10 WaU. 15. 
 
 U. S.; moneyed judgment can- 
 not be rendered against except in 
 the Coiut of Claims, a 
 DAVIS, ARTHUR v. See Arthur v. D.^vis. 
 DAVnS V. BRADEN, 10 P. 888. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 
 a 11 Wall. 92, U. S. v. Tynen. 
 a 17 Wall. 431, State v. Stoll. 
 a 96 U. S. 158, Koldsaat u. Murphy 
 See Aspinwall v. Daviess Co. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 201, Case v. Terrell. 
 a 9S U. S. 437, Carr v. V. S. 
 
 a 24 H. 306, Wiggins v. Gray^ 
 
 a 
 
 a 
 
 DAVIS T. BROWN, 94 U. S. 483. 
 
 Judgments; estoppels; res judi- 
 cata, a 
 
 DAVIS V. GRAT, 16 WaU. 880. 
 
 U. S. courts ; parties, a 
 
 Conditions precedent, b 
 
 An unconsritntionallaw null and 
 void, c 
 
 Conditions subsequent, d 
 
 Equity; receivers, e 
 . States; contracts by. f 
 DAVIS, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Davis. 
 DAVIS, LEONARD v. See Leonard v. Davis. 
 DAVIS V. PACKARD, 6 P. 41. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State coin-t; suit against foreigu 
 consul, a 
 
 Federal question. 6 
 
 Consuls ; duties, c 
 
 3 Wall. 255, Daniels v. R. R. Co. 
 
 7 Wall. 581, U. S. v. Roseuburg. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 263, Campbell v. Rankin. 
 
 20 Wall. 124, Knapp v. R.R.Co 
 92 U. S. 173, Cai-ey v. Brown. 
 92 U. S. 541, Board v. McComb. 
 97 U. S. 696, Ruoh v. Rock Isl'd 
 99 U. S. 198, Exp. Co. u. R. R. 
 
 /lOO U. S. 557, Newton u.Com'rs. 
 
 d 102 U. S. 112, Giddingsu. Ins. Co 
 
 a 7 P. 281, Davis v. Packard, 
 a 8 P. 320, Davis v. Packard. 
 6 10 P. 391, Crowell v. Randell. 
 c 9 H. 377, Harrison v. Vose. 
 
80 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 DAVIS V. PACKARD, 8 P. 333. 
 
 Supreme Court U.S.; control over I a 6 H. 36, Bauk U. S. v. Moss, 
 its own jiidgraeiits. a \ 
 
 DAVIS, PBUGH V. See Pengh v. Darls. 
 DAVIS V. POLICE JURY, 9 H. 880. 
 
 620, U. S. V. D'Anterive. 
 50, Montaulet v. U. S. 
 
 Treaties ; construction, a a 10 H, 
 
 Louisi.inii laiiil titles; invalidity 6 12 H. 
 of Frencli grant in ceded territory. 6 
 DAVIS, SICARD V. See Sicard v. Davis. 
 DAVIS, TENNESSEE v. See Tennessee ij. D.'tvis. 
 DAVIS V. WOOD, 1 Wh. 6. 
 
 Heai-say evidence, a | a 10 ]'. 432, EUicott v. Pearl. 
 
 I a 24 H. 209, Vigel v. Kayior. 
 
 DATFSON V. GODFREY, 4 Cr. 383. 
 
 Tiie Kevolntion did not deprive 1 a 8 Wh. 480, Society v. New Haven 
 any person of civil rights, a \ ■ _ 
 
 DAWSON, U. S. V. See U. S. ■!;. Dawson. 
 DAY V. CHISM, 10 Wli. 449. 
 
 Supreme Court; reversal of judg- I a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis, 
 meat witli leave to amend, a \ 
 
 DAY, COLLECTOR v. See Collector ii. Day. 
 DAY V. GAXLDP, 3 WaU. 113. 
 
 Conflict of jiuisdiction between 
 State and Federal courts, a 
 DAY V. MICOU, i8 Wall. 160. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; void and voidable 
 judgments, a 
 Confiscation. 6 
 
 DAY, PUTNAM t. See Putnam v. Day. 
 DAY V. W^ASHBURN, 84 H. 355. 
 
 Creditor's bill; judgment and 
 execnti6n returned unsatisfied, a 
 
 DAY V. WOODWORTH, 13 H. 371. 
 
 Damages ; torts ; exemplary dam- 
 ages, a 
 
 Counsel fees. 6 
 
 DAYTON V. LASH, 94 U. S. 118. 
 
 Supreme Court ; supersedeas. 
 Citation, b 
 Dismissal of appeal, c 
 
 a 3 Wall. 342, Buck v. Colbath. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 177, ex parte Lange. 
 6 20 Wall. 115, Confiscation Oases. 
 6 91 U. S. 27, Semmes v. U. S. 
 b 92 U. S. 211, Wallaohu.Van Ris- 
 
 wick. 
 6 90 U. S. 285, Conrad v. Waples. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 195, Chittenden v. 
 
 Brewster. 
 a 101 U. S. 691, Case v Beauregard 
 
 a 21 H. 213, E. R. Co. v. Qnigley. 
 6 23 H. 9, Teese v. Huntington. 
 6 15 Wall. 231, Oelrictis v. Spain. 
 6 15 Wall. 453, Flanders v. Tweed. 
 a 91 U. S. 493, R. R. v. Armes. 
 a 98 U. S. 276, Beckwith v. Bean. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 726, O'Reilly cEdring.- 
 
 tou. 
 6 99 U. S. 609, Bank v. Bank. 
 c 100 U. S. 662, R. R. Co. v. Blair. 
 
 DEAN, KENDIG v. See Kendig v. Dean. 
 DEAN T. MASON, 80 H. 198. 
 
 Patent law ; assignees ; meaning 
 of tlie word "interested" in pat- 
 nt act. (0 St. 123.) a 
 
 Damages ; profits. 6 
 
 a 7 Wall. 522, Moore v. Marsli. 
 6 9 Wall. 802 Rubber Co. v. Good- 
 year. 
 6 93 U. S. 70, Birdsall v. Coolidge 
 
MANUAIi OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 81 
 
 DEAN V. iraXSON, 10 "WaU. 158. 
 
 Civil war; imlginciit in absonco a 11 Wall. 589, Lncllowu. Ramsey, 
 of (lofeiidant wiihiu Confederatp a 17 Wall. 4;i9, LaserouRoeliereaii 
 '"i«'s. a a 18 Wall. 110, University v. Finch 
 
 DEAN, THOMPSON v. Seo Thompson v. Dean. 
 DEANE, BANK OF THE IT. S. v. See Bank of the U. S. v. Dunn. 
 DE ARMAS, NEW ORLEANS v. See New Orleans v. De Armas. 
 DEBOLT, MECH. & TRADERS' BANK v. See Mech.. and Trad. Bank i..Debolt. 
 DEBOI.T, OHIO tIEE & TRUST CO. v. See Ohio Life & Trust Oo. i. Debolt. 
 DECATUR V. PAUUJING, 14 P. 497. 
 
 Mandamus to heads of depart- a 
 
 ments ; powers of District of Co- 6 
 
 Inntibia courts, a 6 
 
 Does not lie where the officer 
 
 exercises a discretion. 6 a 
 
 To reverse judgment refusing a 
 
 mandamus, remedy is by writ of 6 
 
 error, c c 
 
 6 
 
 6 102 U. S. 395, U. S. v. Sohurz. 
 
 DECATUR BANK v. ST. LOUIS BANK, 21 "WaU. 301. 
 
 G II. 99, Bi-ashoar v. Mason. 
 
 7 H. 12-2, Wilkes v. Dinsman. 
 
 11 H. 287, lleeside v. Walker. 
 
 16 H. 2G9, Bartlett v. Kane. 
 
 17 H. 229, U. S. V. Seaman. 
 17 H. 301, U. S. V. Gnthrie. 
 
 4 Wall. 5;i4, Com'r u.Whiteley. 
 (i Wall. 497. ex parte De G-i-oot 
 7 Wall. 350, Gaines v. Thomp- 
 son. 
 9 Wall. 312, Sec. u McGarrahan 
 
 a 91 U. S. 28, McLemore v. Bank. 
 
 Supreme Conit ; will not reverse 
 wliere plaintiff in error's case is 
 fatally defective, a 
 
 DECHEXAUX, CHAPPEDELATNE v. See Ohappedelaine v. Dechenaux. 
 DEERING, FAR. & MECH. BANK T. See Far. & Mech. Bank v. Deering. 
 DEERT M. CRAY, 5 WaU. 795. 
 
 Error; immaterial rulings, a | a 17 Wall. 639, Smith » Shoemaker 
 DEFREES, TTLER v. See Tyler v. Defrees. 
 DEGROOT V. U. S., 5 W^all. 433. 
 
 U.S.; suits against; set-offs, a 
 
 Awards by public officers; when 
 they act ministerially. 6 
 
 Court of Claims; findings of 
 facts ; review of by Sup. Court, c 
 
 DE HARO, U. S. V. See V. S. v. De Haro. 
 DELKELMAN, U. S. ^r. See U. S. v. Deikelman. 
 DE KRAFFT v. BARNEY, 8 Bl. 714. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter i a 92 U, 
 in dispute, a I 
 
 DE LA CROIX V. CHAMBERLAIN, 13 Wh. 
 
 Action at law on equitable title, a 
 Political questions. 6 
 Spanish concession in Florida af- 
 ter cession, c 
 
 a 6 Wall. 491, U. S. v. Eckfoid. 
 6 7 Wall. 194, Gordon v. U. S. 
 a 11 Wall. 201, Case v. Terrell, 
 c 98 U. S. 444, The Abbotsford. 
 
 , S. 361, Potts V. Chumasero. 
 
 699. 
 
 a 6 P. 767, Strother v. Lucas. 
 a 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 6 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 c 14 P. 360, Pollard v. Kibbe. 
 
 DE LA LANZA, DOSWELL v. See Doswell v. De La L.anzi. 
 DELASSUS V. U. S., 9 P. 118. 
 
 Missouri laud titles; Spanish 
 grants ; concession by the lieuten- 
 ant-governor, a 
 
 Power to grant ; valid execution 
 of power presumed, b 
 6 
 
 a 9 P. 137, Chouteau v. U. S. 
 a 12 P. 427, StrotJier v. Lucas. 
 a 8 H.301, Menard v. Masspy. 
 b 20 U. 60, U. S. V. Cambu.stou. 
 b 22 H. 459, Fnentes v. U. S. 
 
82 
 
 MANUAL OP STTPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 DEI/AWABB EVS. CO., MAKSHAXI. v. See Marshall v. Delaware Ins. Co. 
 DEI.AWABE BAELROAB TAX, 18 Wall. S25. 
 
 Coiiatirution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; exemption from taxation, a 
 Taxation of railroads. 5 
 Consolidation, c 
 
 a 22 Wall. 57.5, Tnolier uFergnson. 
 b 92 U. S. 611, St. R. R. Tax Case. 
 a 02 U. S. 675, R. R. d. Geoi'sia. 
 a 93 U. S. 222, Morgan v Loiiisianii 
 c 94 U. S. 726, E. E. v. Virginia, 
 c 96 U. S. 511, E. E. Co. v. Maine. 
 
 DEI.. & KAKITAN CANAL, BUNDLE v. 
 DEL COL V. ARNOLD, 3 Dall. 333. 
 
 Prize ; courts of neutral, a 
 Marino torts ; damages. 6 
 Admiralty; attachment to com- 
 pel appearance, c 
 
 DELMAS V. INS. CO., 14 Wall. 661. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error to 
 State courts ; Federal question ; 
 questions of general public law 
 growing out of the war. a 
 
 See Rundle v. Del. & Earitan Canal 
 
 a 1 Wh. 252, L'Invincible. 
 
 6 3 Wli. 546, Tlie Amiable Kancy. 
 
 c 10 Wh. 484, Manro v. Almeida. 
 
 a 15 Willi. 68, Tarver v. EeacU. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 548, Boyce v. Tabb. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 130, Eockhold v. Rock- 
 hold. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 287, Ins. Co. v. Hendren 
 
 a 93 U. S. 589, U. S. v. Thompson. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 333, Bank v. McVeigh. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 321, University v People 
 DELESPINE, U. S. V. See U. S. -u. Delespme. 
 DE LANCEY, McKEEN v. See McKeen v. De Lancey. 
 DBMAKET, BETHEL v. See Bethel v. Demaret. 
 DEN, McETVEN v. See MoEwen v. Den. 
 DEN V. NEW JERSEY CO., 16 H. 438. 
 
 Land below low-water mark bo- i a 18 H. 72, Smith v. Maryland 
 ngs to the State ; fisheries, a | a 23 Wall. 68, St. Clair v Loving 
 
 Jon, 
 
 DENEAL V. STUMP, 8 P. 686. 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error; 
 
 Lovlngston 
 
 mistakes in ; dismissal. 
 Joinder of parties. 6 
 
 a 12 P. 140, Wilson v. Ins. Co. 
 a a 12 H. 21, Smith v. Clark. 
 
 6 6 Wall. 362, Mussina w. Cavazos. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 86, The Protector. 
 
 6 20 Wall. 1.58, Simpson u, Greeley. 
 DENIG, BUBDELL T. See Burdell v. Denig. 
 DENMEAD, WINANS v. See Winans v. Denmead. 
 DENNIE, HABRIS v. See Harris v. Dennie. 
 DENNISON, KENTUCKY v. See Kentucky v. Dennison. 
 DENNISON, WASHINGTON V. See Washington s. Dennison. 
 DENNISTOWN V. STEWART, 18 H. 665. 
 
 Certificates of division, a | a 3 Wall. 254, Daniels v. R. E. Co. 
 
 DEPEAU V. HUMPHBEY, 80 H. 1. 
 
 Contracts; by what law gov-] 
 erned ; interest ; usury, a 
 
 DEBBY, PHILA. & BEAD. B. B. v. 
 DEBMOTT V. JONES, 8 Wall. 1. 
 
 Warranty, a I 
 
 DEBMOTT, JONES v. See Jones v. Dermott. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 310, Miller v. Tifflny. 
 a 91 U. S. 412, Scudder v. Bank. 
 See Phila. & Read. R. E. «. Derby. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 658, Osborn v. Nicholson 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 83 
 
 a 16 H. 442, Ins. Co. v. Debolt. 
 6 9 Wall. 391, Bushiiell v Kennedy 
 
 DESHI.KB V. DODCi;, 16 H. &%9. 
 
 Constitution ; exemption from 
 taxation ; protection afforded where 
 proceeding is under an unconstitu-, 
 tional law. a 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship; suits 
 bj' assignees ; section 11 of judiciary 
 act. b 
 
 DESMASB -r. V. S., 93 U. S. 605. 
 
 Civil war; effect of the capture 
 of New Orleans on the property of 
 the inhabitants, a 
 
 DBS MOENKS CO., WOIiCOTT v. See Wolcott v. Des Moines Co. 
 DES MOINES K. B. CO., BUKK v. See Burr v. Des Moines K. K. Co. 
 »E SOBKY V. NICHOLSON, 3 WaU. 430. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 495, Clark v. U. 8. 
 
 U. S. courts ; citizenship; as- 
 signees ; sec. 11 of judiciary act. a 
 
 DE TBEVU-IE v. SMAXIS, .98 U. S, 
 
 Tax salps for direct taxes, a 
 Constitution; due process of law.6 
 
 a 8 Wall. 396, Bradley v. Rhines. 
 a 11 Wall. 216, Ins. Co. v. Francis. 
 
 S17. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 442, Keeley v. Sandei-s. 
 a 99 U. S. 497, Sherry v. McKin- 
 
 ley. 
 6 102 U. S. 594, Springer v. U. S. 
 
 DE VAIXE, CROSS v. See Cross v. De Valle. 
 
 DEVEAtJX, BANK OF THE U. S. v. See Bank o£ tlie U. S. «. Deveaux. 
 
 BEVEKEATJX v. MAKB, 18 Wi. 812. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 
 DE VrLXEMONT v. U. S., 13 H. 866 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; incomplete i 
 Spanish grants, a 
 
 Grants on conditions. 6 ] 
 
 DETTEES, BOTHWEIX v. See Eotliwell v. Dewees, 
 DEWING T. PEKDICABIES, 96 V. S. 193. 
 
 Civil war; the Confederacy, a \a 97 U. S. 
 
 Ordinance of secession void. 6 | 6 102 U. S. 
 DE WITT, U. S. V. See U. S. i). DeWltt. 
 D'WOLF V. JOHNSON, 10 Wli. 367. 
 
 Usuiy. a 
 
 Incompetency of witness on ac- 
 count of interest. 6 
 
 Contracts; by what law gov- 
 erned, c 
 D'WOIiF V. BABATJD, 1 P. 476. 
 
 Statute of frauds; promise to 
 pay debt of another, a 
 
 Nonsuit. 6 
 
 U. S. courts; want of jurisdic- 
 tion raised by plea in abatement, c 
 
 a 7 H. 190, U. S. V. Chicago. 
 a 3 Wall. 254, Daniels u. E. E. Co. 
 
 a 17 H. 552, Fremont ». U. S. 
 a 18 H. 474, Ledoux ». Black. 
 6 23 H. 317, U. S. u. Noe. 
 
 604, Ford v. Surgett. 
 419, Daniels v. Tierney 
 
 4P, 
 13 P, 
 
 oH. 
 91 U. 
 
 •206, Lloyd v. Scott. 
 
 78, Andrews v. Pond. 
 
 94, Bridges w. Armor. 
 S. 411, Scudder B. Bank. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 250, Gates v. Bank. 
 
 DEXTER, THE, 23 WaU. 69. 
 
 Collision; lookouts, a 
 DEXTEB, CARPENTER v. See Carpenter v. Dexter. 
 
 a 2 P. 174, Townsley v. Sumrall. 
 
 6 6 P. 608, Crane v. Morris. 
 
 c 7 H. 215, Smith v. Kernochen. 
 
 6 14 H. 219, Silsby v. Foote. 
 
 c 14 H. 508, Sheppard v. Graves. 
 
 6 23 H. 183, Castle ». Bullard. 
 
 6 1 WaU. 369, Schuchardt u. Allen 
 
 a 23 Wall. 177, The Sea Gull. 
 
84 MANUAL OP SUPREME COTJKT DECISIONS. 
 
 DEXTEB, HODGSON V. See Hodgson v. Dexter. 
 DE YOUNG, KEPLINGEB v. See Keplinger v. De Young. 
 DE YOUNG, LEAGUE v. See League v. De Young. 
 DIAX V. BBYNOIiDS, 96 U. S. 340. 
 
 Eqnify ; multifariousness, a | a 98 U. S. 60, Peters v. Bowman. 
 DIALOGUE, PENNOCK v. See Pennock v. Dialogue. 
 DIANA, THE, 3 WU. 68. 
 
 Admiralty ; costs and interest, a | a 95 U. S. 618, The Wanata. 
 DICK, 1.EE V. See Lee v. Dick. 
 DICKENS V. BBAI-, 10 P. 681. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice ; due 
 diligence, a 
 
 Wlien a question for the court, b 
 
 a 4 H. 210, Carpenter v. Ins. Co. 
 a 4 H. 344, Harris v. Eobiiison. 
 6 18 H. 517, Watson v. Tarpley. 
 
 DICKENSON V. PLANTERS' BANK, 16 Wall. 850. 
 
 Trial witliout jnry ; act of 1865. cs | a 91 U. S. 614, Gilman ». Tel. Co. 
 
 DICKEESON V. COLGEOVE, 100 V. S. 678. 
 
 Ejectment ; estoppels in pais, a a 101 U: S. 499, Baker v. Humphrey 
 
 a 102 U. S. 78, Kirk v. Hamilton. 
 a 102 U. S. 570, George v. Tate. 
 
 DICKEY V. BALT. INS. CO., 7 Cr. 387. 
 
 Marine inisnrance ; construction j a 20 Wall. 497, Ins. Co.' v. Hearne. 
 of "at " and '• from " in policy, a I 
 
 DICKINSON, CATHERINE, THE, v. See The Catherine b. Dickinson. 
 
 DICKSON, U. S. V. See U. S. ■». Dickson. 
 
 DIGGES, VAN BUREN v. See Tan Bureu v. Digges. 
 
 DIGGS V. "WALCOTT, 4 Cr. 179. 
 
 TJ. S. courts; injunctions against 
 State courts, a 
 
 Injunctions by State court against 
 Federal court, b 
 
 o 7 H. 618, Peck v. Jenness. 
 
 6 6 Wall. 195, Riggs v. Johnson. 
 
 b 6 Wall. 517, U. S. v. Keokuk. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 341, Dial v. Keynolds. 
 DILL, WHITRIDGE v. See Whitridge ■o. Dill. 
 DILLON V. BARNARD, 81 WaU. 430. 
 
 Demurrers, a I a 91 U. S. 536, Gould v. R. E. 
 
 I a 09 U. S. 45, CJ. S. v. Ames. 
 DILLON, HAMILTON v. See Hamilton v. Dillon. 
 DILLON, MACKEY v. See Mackey v. Dillon. 
 DINSMAN, WILKES v. See Wilkes v. Dinsman. 
 DIRST V. MORRIS, 14 WaU. 490. 
 
 Supremo Court ; review of find- i a IS Wall. 2.52, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 mgs of facts, a | o 19 Wall. 72, Crews v. Brewer. 
 
 DISINTEGRATING CO., ATKINS V. See Atkins ,,. Disintegrating Co. 
 DISTILLED SPIRITS, 10 WaU. 364. 
 
 Internal revenue ; sale to purchas- 
 ers without payment of duties, a 
 Agency, b 
 Repeals; by implication, c 
 
 DIVINA PASTORA, THE, 4 Wli. 68. 
 
 Prize ; neutrality, a 
 Evidence limited to plea. 6 
 Political questions, c 
 
 a 14 Wall. 62, Henderson's Dis- 
 tilled Spirits. 
 6 91 U. S. 310, Hoover v. Wise, 
 c 95 U. S. 196, Pabbri v. Murphy. 
 
 a 4 Wh. 497, The JsTnestra Senora. 
 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis, 
 c 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 85 
 
 DIX, 'WEST KIVEB BRIDGE: v. See West Eiver Bridge v. Dix. 
 DIXON V. KAMSEY, 3 Cr. 319. 
 
 Administrator; suits in other | a 15 P. 4, Viuighaii u. Northup 
 States, a j o 9 Wall. 400, Noonaii v. Bradley. 
 
 DOANE, HANNAUEK v. See Hannauer v. Doane. 
 DOANE PENHAIiliOW v. See Penliallow v. Doane. 
 DOANE BICHABDSON v. See Ricliardson v. Doane. 
 DOBBINS V. EBIE CO., 16 P. 443. 
 
 Constitution ; State cannot tax I a 11 Wall. 122, Collector v. Day. 
 salary of U. S. officer, a | a 91 U. S. 34, Bank u. Dealing. 
 
 DOBBINS' DISTnXEBT v. V. S., 96 IT. S. 401. 
 
 Revenue ; t a x on distilleries ; | a 99 U. S. 397, Hartman v. Bean, 
 lien for. o I 
 
 DODDBIDGE V. THOMPSON, 9 Wli. 469. 
 
 Suits in which the government Is a 9 Wh. 
 interested, a 6 2 P. 
 
 Boundaries; rivers. 6 
 DODGE, DESHXEE v. See Deshler v. Dodge. 
 DODGE, BUSSEIX V. See Russell v. Dodge. 
 DODGE V. "WOOISEY, 18 H. 336. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- 
 tracts; exemptions; illegal taxa- 
 tion, a 
 
 Eight of dissenting stockholder 
 to sue. 6 
 
 U.S. courts; jurisdiction where 
 a State is interested in the suit; in 
 deciding who are parties, court will 
 not look beyond the record, c 
 
 816, O^born v. Bank U S. 
 4i3, Reynolds v. M Arthur 
 
 a 18 II. 383, Bank v. Debolt. 
 
 a 18 H. 385, Baijlv v. Thomas. 
 
 6 23 H. 395, Zabriskie v. R. R. Co. 
 
 a 
 
 a 
 
 a 
 
 b 
 a 
 
 DOE T. BRADBN, 16 H. 654. 
 
 Executive ; when its action 
 final, a 
 
 DOE V. CEULDEESS, 31 Wall. 648. 
 
 Bankrupt and State courts ; their I 
 respective jurisdiction, a I 
 
 DOE V. CONSEDINE, 6 Wall. 469. 
 
 Contingent remainders ; rule in 
 Shelly's case, a 
 Estates for life ; wills. 6 
 
 DOE V. ESI.AVA, 9 H. 421. 
 
 Si)anish grants; complete and 
 
 incomplete titles, a 
 Double concessions. 6 
 Registers and receivers, c 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error to 
 
 State courts; Federal question, d 
 
 1 Bl. 475, Bank v. Ohio. 
 2B1.544, Wright i>. Sill. 
 4 Wall. 554, Van Hoffmuu v. 
 
 Quiucy. 
 8 Wall. 73, Memphis v. Dean. 
 8 Wall. 438, Home of the Friend- 
 less V. Rou^e. 
 a 13 Wall. 376, Salt Co. v. East 
 
 Saginaw, 
 c 16 Wall. 220, Davis «. Gray. 
 b 16 Wall. 451, Ribont). R. R. Cos. 
 b 18 Wall. 627, Davenport v. Dow. 
 a 21 Wall. 498, Erie R. R. v. Penn. 
 a 95 U. S. 690, Farrington v. Tenn 
 b 96 U. S. 197, Dewing v. Perdica- 
 ries. 
 
 a 18 H. 285, Murray v. IToboken. 
 a 17 Wall. 242, Holden v. Joy. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 526, Eyster v. Gaff. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 491, Green v. Green. 
 6 101 U. S. 788, Young v. Bradley. 
 
 a 9 H. 4.67, Doe v. Mobile. 
 
 b 22 H. 340, Berthold v. McDonald 
 
 c 24 H. 361, Tate v. Carney. 
 
 d 4 Wall. 210, Lanfear v. Hiinley. 
 
86 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 DOE V. GBTMES. See Elmore «. Giymes, 
 DOE V. WILSOSr, 23 H. 457. 
 
 Indians; reservations, a 
 
 a 1 Bl. 356, Crews v. Biiroham. 
 h 17 Wall. 247, Holden v. Joy. 
 
 Treaties with. 6 
 
 DOGGETX V. KAIIiKOAD CO., 99 U. S. 72. 
 
 Equity ; parties, a | a 99 U. S. 199, Ex. Co. v. E. R. Co. 
 
 DOI.I.AB SATTNGS BANK v. V. S., 19 Wall. 2S». 
 
 Statutes; when the State is in- 
 clnded. a 
 Revenue; suits to recover taxes. 6 
 
 DOLFH, BABNET v. See Barney v. Dolph. 
 DONALDSON v. TAKWEIX, 93 V. S. 631 
 
 a 20 Wall. 263, U. S. v. Herron. 
 & 99 U. S. 233, King v. V. S. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; assignee takes 
 property subject to equities, a 
 
 Sav- 
 
 a 95 U. S. 766, Yeatman v. 
 ings Inst. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 739, Stewart v. Piatt. 
 DONAI/DSON, UTLET v. See Utley v. Donaldson. 
 DONEttT, BANK U. S. v. See Bank U. S. « Donelly. 
 DOOLEY T. SMITH, 13 WaU. 604. 
 
 Legal-tender; "dollars." a I a 15 Wall. 195, Railroad d Johnson 
 
 I a 96 U. S. 587, Bissell v. Heyward. 
 
 DOEEMUS, CAMDEN T. See Camden v. Doremns. 
 DOBEMUS, McAEEE -v. See McAtee v. Doremns. 
 DOOB, EX PAKTE, 3 H. 103. 
 
 U. S. Courts ; habeas corpus, a | a 20 H. 597, Taylor v. Carryl. 
 
 DOBB T. PACIFIC INS. CO., 7 ■Wll. 682. 
 
 Marine insurance ; discharge of I a 10 Wh. 416, Janney v. Ins. Co. 
 underwriters; ship unseaworthy. a | a 22 H. 116, Ins. Co. v. Mordecai. 
 
 DOBSEX T. PACKWOOD, 12 H. 126. 
 
 Equity ; specific performance, a | a 10 Wall. 170, Dean v. Nelson. 
 
 DOS HEEMANOS, 10 Wh. 311. 
 
 Supreme Court ; supersedeas, a 
 Appeal ; when a matter of right.. 6 
 When case will not be dismissed 
 for want of bond, c 
 
 Prize ; U. S. take captured prop- 
 erty jure reipublicce. d 
 
 DOSS V. TYACK, 14 H. 297. 
 
 Judgments; power of the court 
 over during the term, a 
 
 a 16 H. 146, Adams v Law. 
 a 23 H. 1, Anson v. Railroad. 
 b 6 Wall. 107, U. S. v. Adams, 
 c 7 Wall. 311, Edmonson uBloom- 
 
 shire. 
 a 12 Wall. 149, Bigler v. Waller. 
 d 13 Wall. 893, The Siren. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 752, Goddard v. Ord- 
 way. 
 
 29. 
 
 DOSWEIX, V. DE LA LANZA, 20 H. 
 
 Texas land titles ; empresario 
 grants, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; will not review 
 granting or refusing new trials, b 
 
 DOUGLAS v. DOUGLAS, 21 Wall. 98. 
 
 Replevin, a \ a 22 Wall. 214, Sweeney v. Lonime 
 
 DOUGLASS, HUIDEKOPEB v. See Huidekoper v. Douglass 
 DOUGLASS v. PIKE CO., 101 U. S. 677. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads ; recitals ; estoppel ; bona- 
 fldc holders, a i 
 
 a 20 H. 265, Spenser v. Lapsley. 
 6 3 Wall. 103, Sparrow v. Strong. 
 6 13 Wall. 604, Ins. Co. v. Barton. 
 6 93 U. S. 301, Railroadc. Horst. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 695, Anthony d. Jasper. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 87 
 
 DOUGIASS T. KEITNOLDS, 1 P, 
 
 Guaranty ; notice, a 
 
 las. 
 
 a 10 P. 491, Lee v. Dick. 
 
 a 12 P. 212, Adams v. Jones. 
 
 a 12 P. 497, Reynolds v. Douglass 
 
 a 1 H. 180, Beil v. Bi-uin. 
 
 a 2 H. 478, Rhett v. Poe. 
 
 a 10 H. 472, M'f'g Co. v. Welch. 
 DOUGIiASS, REYNOLDS v. See Reynolds d. Douglass. 
 DOUGIiASS CO. V. BOI^IiES, 94 U. S. 104. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 
 a97U. 
 a98U. 
 
 aid of railroads; conditions; reci- 
 tals ; estoppel ; bona-fide holders, a 
 
 DOWNES T. CHURCH, 13 P. 807. 
 
 Negotiable paper; either set of 
 bill of exchange may be presented 
 for acceptance, a 
 
 DOTBTSHAM v. ALEXAXDRIA, 9 WaU, 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error 
 to State courts; the "highest court 
 of a State." a 
 DOWNS, MASSLNGILIi t. See Massingill d. Downs. 
 DOWS v. CHICAGO, 11 W^aU. 109. 
 
 104, Warren Co. v Marcy 
 102, Daviess Co. v. Hui- 
 dekoper. 
 
 a 22 H. 108, Bank v. Neal. 
 
 659. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 306, Gregory v McVeigh 
 
 Equity; jurisdiction to restrain 
 collection of a tax. a 
 
 a 15 Wall. 549, Hanniwinkle c. 
 Georgetown. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 89, Clieatham v. U. S. 
 
 a 92 S. U. 613, St. R. R. Tax Cas. 
 DOWS, MTJIXER T. See MuUer v. Dows. 
 DOX V. POSTMASTER-GENERAi, 1 P. 318. 
 
 U, S.; liability for torts and acts a 8 H. 101, U. S. v. Buchanan, 
 of its oflScers. a a 8 Wall. 274, Gibbons «. (J. S. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 663, Jones v. U. S. 
 DOZIER, BAXLET V. See Bailey v. Dozier. 
 DRAKE, EDMONSTON v. See Edmonston v. Drake. 
 
 DRAKE, I.ATHROP v. See Ijatlirop v. Drake. 
 DRAKEtET v. GREGG, 8 WaU. 848. 
 
 Verdict ; when the court can di- i as 95 U. S. 266, Ins. Co. v. Rodel. 
 rect. a \ 
 
 DREDGE V. FORSYTH, 9 Bl. 564. 
 
 Illinois land titles; Peoria lots; a 2 Bl. 573, Kellogg u Forsyth, 
 limitations, a b 93 U. S. 556, Stanton vEmbrey. 
 
 Bills of exceptions, b b 102 U. S. 354, Hunnicutt v. Pey- 
 
 ton. 
 DREVILLE, W^AXKER v. See 'Walker v. Dreville. 
 DREW, TA€P V. See Taupr. Drew. 
 DROGAN, .HOBART t. See Hobart v. Drogan. 
 DROMGOOLE V. FAB. AND MER. BANK, 8 H. 843. 
 
 U. S. courts ; suits by assignees ; 
 sec. 11 of judiciary aat. a 
 Rule of decision. 6 
 
 DBUMMOND V. MAGRUDER, 9 Cr. 
 
 Evidence ; exhibits may be I 
 ■ proved by parol testimony, a | 
 
 a 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. v. 
 
 b 18 H. 517, Watson v. Tarpley. 
 
 as 6 Wli. 557, Kerr v. Watts. 
 
88 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREMLI COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 DBUMMOND T. PBESTMAN, 13 Wb. 
 
 Griiaraiity. a 
 
 Statute of frauds ; agreement to 
 pay debt of another, b 
 
 DBURY V. CROSS, 7 Wall. 299. 
 
 Corporations; directors, a 
 
 DUBOIS V. HEPBCBN, 10 P. 17. 
 
 'I'axes ; construction of act for 
 redemption of land from tax sale ; 
 offer to pay the tax. a 
 
 DUBOIS, TOME V. See Tome v. Dubois. 
 
 DUBUQUE, GEtPCKE v. See Gelpcke v. Dubuque. 
 
 DUBUQUE & PACIFIC B. B. CO., EX PABTE, 1 Wall. 73. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 272, Litchfield v. K. 
 
 LITCHFIEtD, 83 H. 83. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 687, Walcott v. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandate, a 
 
 DUBUQUE & PACIFIC E. B. CO. v. 
 
 Land grant to Iowa in aid of rail- 
 roads of tracts along the Des Moines 
 Eivor. a 
 
 Grants by the government con- 
 strued against grantee, b 
 
 DUCAT T. CHICAGO, 10 WaU. 415. 
 
 Corporations; rights in other 
 States, a 
 
 DUDLEY, BANK OF HAMILTON v. 
 DUFAU V. COUPBEY, 6 P. 170. 
 
 Pleading ; immaterial issues. 
 
 , 515. 
 
 a 7 P. 114, Douglas ». Reynolds. 
 
 6 1 H. ISO, Cell V. Bruen. 
 
 a 92 U. S. S92, Smeltzer v. White. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 589, Oil Co. v. Marbury. 
 
 a 12 P. 374, Hepburn v. Dubois. 
 a 10 Wall. 475, Corbett v. Nutt. 
 a 102 U. S. 657, Barrett v. Holmes. 
 
 E. 
 
 Des 
 
 Moines Co. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 147, Williams u. Baker. 
 
 b 92 U. S. 740, R. E. Co. v. U. S. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 763, Wolsey v. Chap- 
 man. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 774, Litchfield v. Web- 
 ster Co. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 457,. Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 a 94 U. S. 540, Doyle v. Ins. Co. 
 
 See Bank of Hamilton v. Dudley. 
 
 a i a 7 H. 714, Townsend v. Jennison. 
 
 DUGAN, EX PABTE, 3 WaU. 134. 
 
 Sup. Court ; habeas corpus, a \ 
 
 DUGAN V. UNITED STATES, 3 Wh. 
 
 U.S.; power to contract; volun- 
 tary and common-law bonds, a 
 
 Commissioner of Internal Rev- 
 enue ; subordinate officer of the 
 Treasury. 6 
 
 DULANY T. HODGSON, 6 Cr. 333. 
 
 Negotiable paper; notice ; due I 
 diligence; bankruptcy, o | 
 
 DUN, McABTHUB v. See McArthur i). Dun. 
 DUNBAB T. MYEBS, 94 U. S. 196. 
 
 Patent law; what must be 
 shown before patent can issue, a 
 
 DUNCAN V. DABST, 1 H. 301. 
 
 Sherill'; proceedings against; 
 
 U. (S'. dourts ; State practice acts, a 
 
 Independent of State control. 6 
 
 a 6 Wall. 324, ex parte McCardle. 
 
 178. 
 
 a 5 P. 125, U. S. V. Tingey. 
 a 10 P. 343, U. S. v. Bradley. 
 a 11 H. 231, Cotton v. U. S. 
 a 12 H. 102, Neilson v. Lagow. 
 a 10 Wall. 407, U. S. v. Hodson. 
 b 100 U. S. 12, Soule v. U. S. 
 
 a 3 H. 529, Camden v. Doremus. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 218, Eoemer v. Simon. 
 
 a 2 H. 13, McNutt v. Bland. 
 
 6 6 Wall. 105, Riggs v. Johnson Co. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 89 
 
 DtTNCAJS^ V. JAUDON, 15 Wall. 166. 
 
 Trustees; duty of parties to make I o 95 U. S. 579, R. R. v. Dunint. 
 inquiries as to power of trustee, a \ 
 
 DXfKDAS, MKWTS T. See Erwin v. Dundas. 
 DtrNHAM, INS. CO. v. See Ins. Co. v. Dunham. 
 DUNHAM V. B. ». CO., 1 "Wall. 86S. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 387, Beall v. White. 
 
 b 96 U. S. 671, Ketchiim v Duncan. 
 
 Conveyances of subsequently ac- 
 quired property, a 
 Assignments. 6 
 
 DUNIiAJP, HEPBURN v. See Hepburn v. Dunlap. 
 DUNLAP V. MUNROE, 7 Cr. 870. 
 
 Supreme Court ; review of find- i a 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 Ings of facts, a \ 
 
 DUNXAJP, PEPPER V. See Pepper v. Dunlap. 
 DUUN, BANK OF THE U. S. v. See Bank of the U. S. i). Dunn. 
 DUNN V. CLARKE, 8 P. 1. 
 
 U. S. courts ; citizensliip ; juris 
 
 diction once attacliing not divested 
 by subsequent events, a 
 
 I113 unction to restrain action at 
 law in tlie same court, is ancillary. & 
 
 Substituted service, c 
 
 a 12 P. 170, Clarlie v. Mattiiewson. 
 6 24 H. 460, Freeman v. Howe, 
 c 9 Wall. 811, Rubber Co. u Good- 
 year. 
 b 14 Wall. 81, CIn-istmas v Russell 
 c 16 Wall. 195, Bank v. Turnball. 
 6 22 Wall. 253, French v. Hay. 
 
 DUNN, GAINES v. See Gaines 1>. Dunn. 
 ■ DUNN, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Dunn. 
 DUNN, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Dunn. 
 DUNPHTT V. HaiiEINSMITH, 11 WaU. 610. 
 
 Territorial courts; whetlier sub- la IS Wall. 653, Hornbuckle v. 
 ject to equity rules, a | Toombs. 
 
 DUPONT, SHANKS V. See Shanks 1) . Dupont. 
 DUPONT V. VAJS'CE, 19 H. 171. 
 
 General average ; jettison, a 
 Affreightment ; lien of ship-own- 
 er, b 
 
 a 1 Bl. 113, Bags of Linseed. 
 6 5 Wall. 494, The Eddy. 
 a 9 Wall. 231, Star of Hope. 
 6 9 Wall. 450, The Maggie Ham- 
 moud. 
 
 DUPUIS, ABEBCROMBIE v. See Abercromhie v. Dupuis. 
 DUBANT T. ESSEX CO., 7 WaU. 107. 
 
 Supreme Court; judgments by 
 divided court, a 
 
 a 101 U. S. 555, Durant v. Essex. 
 a 102 U. S. 676, Ilartman v. Green- 
 how. 
 
 DURANT, SUPERVISORS v. See Supervisors v. Durant, 
 DUROUSSEAU v. U. S., 6 Cr. 314. 
 
 Supreme Court; appellate juris- 
 diction, a 
 
 Repeal of law conferring juris- 
 diction ; pending cases, b 
 
 a 1 Wall. 251, ex parte Vallandi- 
 gliam. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 254, Daniels u. R. R. Co. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 512, ex parte McCardle. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 346, Merrill v. Petty. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 620, Murdook v. Mem- 
 phis. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 2.59, U. S. v. Young. 
 
 6 98 U. S. 401, R. R. Co. e. Grant. 
 
90 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 DtJKYEE, BUKK v. Burr v. Daryee. 
 
 DtJBYEE, MILIiS v. See Mills v. Daryee. 
 
 DUTCH CHURCH, HABPEKDING v. See Harpending v. Dutch Church. 
 
 DUTTON T. STRONG, 1 Bl. 33. 
 
 Kipai-iaii proprietors ; rights of ; 
 
 wharves, a 
 
 a 7Wall. 289, K.R. B. Schiirmier. 
 a 10 Wall. 504, Yates v. Milwau- 
 kee. 
 a 21 Wall. 392, Atlee v. Packet Co 
 
 a IB.. 246, McKenna v. Fislc. 
 6 98 U. S. 59, Peters v. Bowman. 
 
 DTTVAL V. CAIG, H "WTl. 45. 
 
 Pleas iia abiLtemeiit. a 
 
 Deeds ; warranty : covenants ; 
 eviction. 6 
 DUVAIi, ROSS V. See Boss v. Duval. 
 DWIGHT, POLLARD v. See Pollard v. Dwight. 
 
 DYER, BAIf^ or ALEXANDRIA v. See Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer. 
 DYNES V. HOOVER, 30 H. 77. 
 
 Court-martials; President ; pow- 
 ers of as commander-inrchief. a 
 
 a 
 
 1 Wall. 254, ex parte Vallandi- 
 gham. 
 a 100 U. S. 21, ex parte Reed. 
 
 EAGER, McCOtliUM v. See MoCoUum v. Eager. 
 
 EAMES, GODFREY t. See Godfrey v. Eames. 
 
 EARLE, BANK OF AUGUSTA v. See Bank of Augusta v. Earle. 
 
 EARLY T. ROGERS, 16 H. 599. 
 
 Sup. Court ; final judgments, o | a 20 H. 555, McCargo v. Cliapman. 
 Accord and satisfaction, b | 6 95 U. S. 484, Brown v. Spoflford. 
 
 EARLY, POSTMASTER-GENERAL v. See Postmaster-General v. Early. 
 EAST HARTFORD v. HARTFORD BRIDGE CO., 10 H. 533. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- a 100 U. S. 55S, Newton ». Com'rs. 
 tracts ; legislative control over mu- 
 nicipal corporations, a 
 
 EAST SAGINATV", SALT CO. v. See Salt Go. v. East Saginaw. 
 EASTER, SWEENY v. See Sweeny v. Easter. 
 EASTON, MACKEY v. See Mackey v. Easton. 
 EASTON, PATTON v. See Patton v. Easton. 
 EASTON V. SALISBURY, 31 H. 438. 
 
 Missouri . titles ; Spanisli conces- 
 sion and New Madrid certificate; 
 reservation, a 
 
 Patent ; void for want of power 
 to issue. 6 
 BATON, EVANS v. See Evans v. Eaton. 
 EATON, NICHOLS V. See Nichols v. Eaton. 
 ECKERT, TELLER v. Sea Teller v. Eckert. 
 ECKFOKD, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Eckford. 
 ECKHART, CHOUTEAU v. See Chouteau i>. Eckhart 
 EDDY, THE, 5 WaU. 565. 
 
 Affreightment ; lien of sliip-own- a 5 Wall. 555, The Bird of Para- 
 er. a dise. 
 
 Delivery, b a 1 Wall. 642, The Belfast. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 450, Tlie Maggie Ham- 
 mond, 
 o 14 Wall. 596, The Delaware. 
 6 95 U. S. 75, ex parte Eastou. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 632, Mackey v. Easton. 
 6 93 U. S. 216, Sherman u. Buick, 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 91 
 
 EDMONSON V. BtOOMSHTRE, 7 "Wall. 306. 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error 
 and appeals ; docketing, a 
 
 a \0 Wall. 425, U. S. v. Vigil. 
 a 20 Wall. 574. Gillett v. Bullard. 
 a 99 U. S. 507, Grigsby v. PurceU. 
 
 EDMONSTON v. DBASE, 5 P. 684. 
 
 Guaranty, a I a 7 P. 114, Douglass v. Reynolds. 
 
 I a 12 P. 207, Adams ». Jones. 
 
 EDKINGTON, O'KETLLY v. See O'Eeilly v. Edrington. 
 EDKrVGTON, SMITH v. See Smith v. Edrington. 
 EDWABD, THE, 1 Wh. 864. 
 
 Sup. Ct.; judgments; reversal, o | a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 
 EDWABDS, BOYCB v. See Boyce v. Edwards. 
 EDWAKDS V. DAKBT, 13 Wli. 806. 
 
 Statutes ; construction ; luiiform 
 practice under, a 
 
 a 18 Wall. 301, Atkins v. Disinte- 
 grating Co. 
 a 23 Wall. 382, Smythe v. Piske. 
 a 95 U. S. 763, U. S. v. Moore. 
 a 99 U. S. 269, U. S. v. Pugh. 
 
 ED-WAUDS V. EIXIOTT, 81 WaU. 557. 
 
 Constitution ; 7th amendment ; 
 trial by jury applies only to courts 
 of the U. S. a 
 
 Error; waiver. 6. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 92, Walker «. Sauvinet 
 a 95 U. S. 296, Pearson u.Yewdall 
 6 97 U. S. 583, Nowcomb v. Wood 
 6 102 U. S. 574, Wilson uMcNamee 
 
 ED"WAKDS, HUGHES v. See Hughes v. Edwards. 
 EDWARDS T. KEABZET, 96 r. S. 695. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- \a 96 U. S. 637, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 tracts; remedy, a I a 102 U. S. 419, Danielsw. Tearney 
 
 EGEKT, LEAGUE v. See League v. Egery. 
 
 EIGHTT-EOUK BOXES OF SUGAB, U. S. v. _See U. S. v. 84 Boxes of Sugar. 
 
 EtDKED V. BANKS, 17 "Wall. 651. 
 
 Judgments ; bar of ; appearance ; I a 20 Wall. 8, Hablch v. Folger. 
 jurisdiction, a I a 20 Wall. 13, Creighton v. Kerr. 
 
 EliDBED, MASON T. See Mason v. Eldred. 
 
 ELDBED, MICHIGAN BANK. v. See Michigan Bank v. Eldred. 
 
 ELGEE COTTON CASE, 88 "Wall. 180. 
 
 Sales of personal property ; when | a 100 U. S. 136, Hatch v. Oil Co. 
 title passes, a 1 
 
 ELIASON V. HENSHA-W, 4 Wh. 885. 
 
 Sale ; conclusion of contract, a I a 14 P. 77, Can- v. Duval. 
 
 Contract by mail, b I 6 9 H. 388, Tayloe v. Ins. Co. 
 
 ELIASON, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Eliason. 
 ELMCOTT V. FEABIi, 10 P. 438. 
 
 Entry under color of title co- 
 extensive with the bounds of the 
 deed, a 
 
 Hearsay evidence ; boundaries, b 
 ELLIOTT, CONNEB v. See Conner v. Elliott. 
 ELLIOTT, EDWABDS v. See Edwards v. Elliott. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 532, Brobst v. Brock. 
 b 102 U. S. 363, Hunnicutt?; Peyton 
 
92 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 340. 
 
 EtMOTT V. PBIBSOLl, 1 P, 
 
 Jiu'isdictioii. a 
 
 Kentucky ; acknowledgment and 
 recording deeds. 6 
 
 Setting aside judgments after 
 terra, c 
 
 Evidence ; impeaching witness b}' 
 evidence of declarations made pre- 
 viously, d 
 
 "Functus officio." e 
 
 Depositions; section 30 of the 
 judiciarj' act. f 
 
 ELMOTT, PEEBSOIiL v. 
 
 ELLIOTT V. SWAKXOUT, 10 P. 137, 
 
 Eeeovery back of illegal taxes; 
 suit against collector, a 
 
 Construction of acts imposing 
 duties. 6 
 
 VVtiethcr article imported is 
 known by the name given it in the 
 tai-ill', is a question foi' the jury. 6 
 
 Removal of suits against collect- 
 ors, c 
 
 a 10 P. 469, Voorhees v. BankU. S. 
 a 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 a 13 P. 509, Wilcox v. Jackson, 
 a 2 H. 335, Grignon v. Astor. 
 b 3 H. G43, Davies v. Fairbairn. 
 a 3 H. 756, Hickey v. Stewart, 
 c 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss, 
 a 8 H. 531, Williamson v. Berry, 
 d 11 H. 490, Conrad v. Griffey. 
 e 18 H. 21, Kissell u. Pnb. Schools. 
 a 18 H. 497, Beauregard v. N. Orl. 
 /ll Wall. 669, Cook v. Burnley. 
 a 18 Wall. 467, Tliompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 See Peirsoll v. Elliott. 
 
 ELLIS, PARISH V. See Parish v. Ellis. 
 ELLISON, WBIGHT v. See Wright v. Ellison. 
 ELLZEY, HEPBUKN v. See Hepburn v. EUzey. 
 ELMENDOEJT v. TATLOE, 10 'Wh. 167. 
 
 Parties, a 
 
 a 13 P. 265, Bend v. Hoyt. 
 6 3 H. 108, Curtis k. Martin. 
 a 3 H. 239, Cary v. Curtis. 
 a 4 H. 331, Kanlcin v. Hoyt. 
 6 7 H. 790, Lawrence v. Albn. 
 c 5 Wjill. 542, Ins. Co. v. Eitdiic. 
 a 5 Wall. 732, Pliila. v. Collector. 
 a 7 Wall. 128, Nicliols v. U. S. 
 a 12 Wall. 209, State Ton. Tax Ca.5. 
 a 22 Wall. 639, Builev v. E. E. Co. 
 6 91 U. S. 363, Arthur jj. Cummin;! 
 a 92 U. S. 451, Barney v. Watson. 
 6 92 U. S. 470, Tyng v. Grinnpll. 
 b 96 U. S. Ill, Arthui' J). Morrison. 
 a 97 U. S. 186, Lamborn v. Com'is 
 a 98 U. S. 544, E. E Co. v. Com'rs 
 
 Limitations of suits in equity; 
 stale claims, b 
 
 State courts; decisions; whenU. 
 S. courts should follow, c 
 
 ELiaOBE V. 
 
 Nonsuit. 
 
 GRTMES, 1 P. 
 
 a 
 
 469. 
 
 ELlffWOOD V. MAKCY, 93 U. S. 889, 
 
 ^ U. S. courts; obligatory force of 
 State decisions, a 
 
 Municipal railroad bonds; notice 
 of election ; power to subscribe, b 
 
 a 12 Wh. 194. Mallow v. Hiude. 
 
 b 5 P. 486, Peyton v. Stith. 
 
 6 6 P. 61, Miiler v. Mclntyrc. 
 
 c 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 
 6 10 P. 180, Boon v. Cliiles. 
 
 c 4 H. 51, Beals v. Hale, 
 
 c 4 H. 370, Foxcroft v. Mallett. 
 
 a 8 H. 409, West v. Smith. 
 
 a 17 H. 137, Sliields v. Barrow. 
 c 100 U. S. 52, Fairfield v. Gallatin 
 
 a 6 P. 60S, Crane v. Morris. 
 a 14 H. 219, Silsby v. Foote. 
 a 23 H. 183, Castle v. Bullard. 
 a 1 Wall. 369, Schuchardtj). Allen 
 a 18 Wall. 250, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 257, East Oakland v. 
 
 Skinner. 
 b 101 U. S. 127, Eoberts v. BoUcs. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 93- 
 
 ELSESEHB, THE, 1 Wh. 439. 
 
 Sup. Ct. ; transcript of record, a [ a 100 U. S. 230, Craig v. Smith. 
 ELY, BAXDWTN t. See Baldwin o. Ely. 
 ELY, RUSSELL v. See Russell v. Ely. 
 EMBREY, STANXON v. See Stanton v. Embrey. 
 EMERSON V. HALL, 13 P. 409. 
 
 Insolvency ; whether claims 1 a 16 P. 224, Mihior v. Metz. 
 sisainst U. S. pass to assignee, a ' 
 
 EMERSON, HOGG v. See Hogg v. Emerson. 
 EMERSON, SLATER v. See Slater v. Emerson. 
 EMERSON V. SLATER, 33 H. 48. 
 
 Statnte o£ irauds; written con- 
 tract ; modification bj"^ subsequent 
 parol agreement, a 
 
 Consideration of contracts ; mu- 
 tual promises. 6 
 
 a 9 Wall. 271, Swain v. Seamens. 
 a 10 Wall. 383, E.R. Co. u. Trimble 
 a 14 Wall. 603, The Delaware. 
 6 94 U. S. 83, Storm v. U. S. 
 a 96 U. S. 689, Hawkins v. U. S. 
 
 EMIGRANT CO. T. "WRIGHT CO., 97 tJ. S. 339. 
 
 Swamp lands ; grants to the \a 97 U. S. 846, Martin v. Marks. 
 States, a \aWO U. S. 63, Emi. Co. v. Adams 
 
 EMILY Al<m CAROLINE, THE. See The Caroline. 
 
 EMORY, CHILDRESS v. See Childress i). Emory. 
 
 EMPIRE V. DAHLINGTON, 101 TJ. S. 87. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 413, Livingston Co. v. 
 Darlington. 
 
 Municip.al bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; bondholders not parties to 
 suit are not concluded by decree 
 pronouncing bonds void, a 
 ENGLEBRBCHT, CLINTON v. See Clinton v. Englebrecht. 
 ENGLISH V. EOXALL, 3 P. 599. 
 
 Equity; allegata and probata a 10 P. 200, Boon «. Chiles, 
 must agree, a & 17 H. 455, Stevens v. Gladding. 
 
 Prayer for general relief. 6 6 10 Wall. 86, Texas v. Harden- 
 
 berg. 
 6 96 U. S. 615, Hayward v. Bank. 
 ENREQUIST, MOREWOOD V. See Morewood v. Enrequist. 
 ERIE CO., DOBBINS v. See Dobbins u. Erie Co. 
 ERIE R. R. CO. T. PENNSYLVAJSIA, 31 WaU. 493. 
 
 Kailroads ; taxation of . a \ a 92 U. S. 611, State R.E. Tax Cas. 
 
 ERSKINE T. HOHNBACH, 14 WaU. 613. 
 
 Ministerial officers; liability as I a 15 Wall. 675, HafBn m. Mason, 
 trespassers, a \ 
 
 ERSKINE V. MILTFATIKEE R. R., 94 IT. S. 619. 
 
 Internal revenue ; t.ax on divi- | a 99 U. S. 575, Elliott v. E. E. Co. 
 dends and interest paid ; penalties, a \ 
 
 ERSKINE V. VAN ARSDALE, 15 Wall. 75. 
 
 Taxes ; recovery back of taxes, a | a 98 U. S. 545, E. E. v. Com'rs. 
 
 EEWIN V. DUNDAS, 4 H. 68. 
 
 Executions ; death of debtor, a 
 
 a 13 H. 290, Taylor v. Doe. 
 a 2 Wall. 317, Eansom «.Williaras. 
 a 4 Wall. 242, Mitchell v. St. Max- 
 ent. 
 
94 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 EBWIN V. LOWBY, 7 H. 173. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction between 
 State and Federal courts, a 
 
 Presumptions in favor of juris- 
 diction, b 
 
 .Slip. Ct. ; release of errors, c 
 
 ERWIN V. U. S., 97 U. S. 398. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; assignment ; claims 
 against U. S. a 
 
 Assignment of claims against the 
 U. S. ; act of 1853. 6 
 
 ESIiAVA, DOE V. See Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 KSIiAVA, MOBHiB v. See Mobile v. Eslava. 
 
 ESPY V. BANK OF CINCDOfATI, 18 WaU. 604. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; acceptance, o | a 94 U. S. 345, Bank o. Whitman. 
 
 ESSEX CO., DtJKANT v. See Durant r. Essex Co. 
 ESTHO V. L.EAB, 7 P. 130. 
 
 Will of General Kosciusko, a | a 8 P. 71, Armstrong o. Lear. 
 
 a 14 H. 372, Peale v. Phipps. 
 6 n Wall. 301, Miller v. U. S. 
 c 93 U. S. 154, O'Hara v. McCon- 
 uell. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 305, Phelps u. McDon- 
 ald. 
 
 6 102 U. S. 558, Goodman v. Nib- 
 lack. 
 
 I a 4 Wh. 501, The Nnestra Senora. 
 
 ESTBEIiliA, THE, 4 WU. 298. 
 
 Prize ; neutral court, a 
 
 ETXING V. BANK OF U. S., 11 Wb. 
 
 Supreme Court ; divided court, a 
 
 Error; instructions to jury. 6 
 
 Written instruments ; wlien in- 
 ferences of fact must be left to the 
 jury, c 
 
 Corporations ; liability for false 
 representation of agent, d 
 
 EVANS V. EATON, 3 Wh. 454. 
 
 Patents for hopper-boj' ; infringe- 
 ment, a 
 
 Evidence ; interested witness. 6 
 
 Error ; charge of court ; province 
 of jury, c 
 
 Speciflcations ; patents, d 
 
 Construction of patent laws, e, 
 
 EVANS V. GEE, 11 P. 81. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; blank indorse- 
 ments, a 
 
 Want of proper citizenship to sue 
 in U. S. courts ; how raised. 6 
 
 Assignees; 11th sec. of judiciary 
 net. c 
 
 Demurrers; pleading over, d 
 
 EVANS V. HETTICH, 7 Wh. 435. 
 
 Patents ; the specification, a | a 6 H. 477, Hogg v. Emerson. 
 
 EVANS V. PHILMPS, 4 Wh. 73. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a | a 11 H. 28, U. S. v. Girault. 
 
 3 H. 424, Bridge Co. v. Stewart 
 11 H. 158, U. S. V. Morgan. 
 21 H. 168, Barreda ». Silsby. 
 21 H. 211, K. R. V. Quigley. 
 
 7 Wall. 112, Durant v. Essex. 
 17 Wall. 142, Goddard v. Foster. 
 20 Wall. 162, Ins. Co.w. Baring, 
 c 101 U. S. 270, West v. Smith. 
 
 a 7 Wh. 424, Evans v. Eaton. 
 6 7 Wh. 468, Evans v. Hettich. 
 .c 4 H. 123, Gerard v. Reynolds. 
 d 6 H. 477, Hogg v. Emerson, 
 e 14 H. 547, Bloomer u.McQue wan. 
 d 15 H. 214, Brooks «. Fiske. 
 
 a 14 P. 
 a 5H. 
 & 7H. 
 c 13 H. 
 6 21H. 
 d93U. 
 
 1, Evans v. G«e. 
 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 215, Smith ». Kernoehen. 
 186, Coffee ». Bank. 
 214, R. R. Co. V. Quigley. 
 S. 653, Stanton v. Embrey. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 95 
 
 EWTNG V. BtJKNETT, 11 P. 51. 
 
 Land titles ; possession ; aban- 
 doutnent ; legal presumption of 
 rightful title ; custom and usage, a 
 
 Limitations ; possession. 6 
 
 Color of title ; adverse posses- 
 sion, c 
 
 Ouster, d 
 
 a 32' P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 
 6 16 P. 511, Watkius v. Holman. 
 
 6 15 H. 327, Anderson v. Boclv. 
 
 c IS H. 52, Wright v. Mattison. 
 
 d 2 Wall. 349, Harvey JJ. Tyler. 
 
 d 14 Wall. 146, Armstrong v. Mor- 
 rill. 
 
 c 99 U. S. 167, Harris u. McGovern 
 EWING, CrARRIXT v. See Garrltyu. Ewing, 
 
 EWING, PIEDMONT INS. CO. v. See Piedmont Ins. Co. v. Ewing. 
 EXCHANGE, THE, v. MoFADON, 7 Cr. 139. 
 
 Immunity of public property of 
 foreign sovereigns, a 
 
 Passage of foreign troops through 
 a State; cession of jurisdiction. 6 
 
 a 1 Wh. 252, The Invincible. 
 
 a 7 Wh. 334, The Santissima 
 Trinidad. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 515, Coleman v. Tenn. 
 
 6 100 y. S. 165, Dow V. Johnson. 
 EXCHANGE BANK, KNOX -v. See Knox v. Exchange Bank. 
 EXPERIMENT, tHE, 8 Wli. 861. 
 
 Blockade ; violation of. a | a 7 Wall. 360, The Diana. 
 
 EXPRESS CO. V. KOUNTZ, 8 WaU. 343. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 331, Jones v. Andrews. 
 6 16 Wall. 516, Tweed's Case, 
 c 17 Wall. 375, R. B. v. Lockwood 
 d 20 Wall. 454, Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 d 99 U. S. 198, Exp. Co. v. E. R. 
 
 U. S. courts ; how citizenship 
 must be shown, a 
 
 Instructions to the jury. 6 
 
 Common ciirriers; negligence, c 
 
 Citizenship of corporations, d 
 EXPRESS CO., VERMILYB v. See Vermilye d. Express Co. 
 ETKE V. POTTER, 15 H. 56. 
 
 Equity ; relief ; when cross-bill 
 necessary, a 
 Fraud ; how alleged. 6 
 
 ETSER, TEIiEGRAPH CO. v. 
 ETSTEB V. GAFF, 9 TJ. S. 531. 
 
 Bankruptcy; jurisdiction of the 
 State courts ; to what extent afifect- 
 ed by the bankrupt act. a 
 
 a 10 Wall. 303, R. R. v. Bradlej's. 
 b 14 Wall. 335, French v. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 6 16 Wall. 29, Voorhees v. Bone- 
 steel. 
 See Telegraph Co. v. Eyser. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 182, Burbank o.Bigelow 
 a 93 U. S. 134, Claflin v Houseman 
 a 94 U. 8. 737, Jerome v. McCarter 
 a 95 U. S. 59, McHenry v. Soci^t^. 
 
 EAIBBAIRN, DAVIESS v. See DaTiess v. Fairbairn. 
 FATRFAX V. FAIRFAX, 5 Cr. 19. 
 
 Administi-ators ; plea of plene 
 administravit. a 
 Co-executors; liability. 6 
 
 FAIRFAX V. HUNTER, 7 Cr. 603. 
 
 Construction of the treaty of 
 peace with England, 1783 ; escheat 
 and forfeiture of lands of Lord 
 Fairfax, a 
 
 Aliens ; inquest of office. 6 
 
 a 8 Wh. 675, Siglar v. Haywood. 
 h 14 P. 166, Edmunds v. Cranshaw 
 a 93 U. S. 43, Smith v. Chapman. 
 
 1 Wh. 323, Martin ». Hunter. 
 3 Wh. 594, Craig v. Radford. 
 
 8 Wh. 480, Sou. V. NewHaven. 
 3 P. 242, Shanks v. Diipont. 
 
 14 P. 128, Rnnyan v. Coster. 
 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Bcnham . 
 5 Wall. 268, U. S. v. Repctigny 
 
 9 Wall. 336, Bennett v. Hunter 
 96 U. S. 289, Conrad v. Waplcs. 
 98 U. S. 628, Bank v. Mathews. 
 
 6 100 U. S. 484, Hauenstein u Lyn- 
 ham. 
 
96 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 FATRriELD v. GAlIiATIN, 100 U. S. 47. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 686, Douglass v. Pike. 
 
 U. S. courts; when tliey will 
 not oliange their decisions in order 
 to conform to those of the State 
 courts, a 
 
 FAI.CON, THE, OtNET v. See OIney u. The Falcon. 
 FANNIE, THE, 11 "WaU. 838. 
 
 Collision ; steamers and sailing I a 15 Wall. 679, The Lucille, 
 vessels, a \ 
 
 EAirarryG v. gkbgoike, le h. 534. 
 
 Ferry grants; exclusive rights; i a 23 H. 437, Minturn u. Larue, 
 construction in favor of the public. a\a 1 Bl. 630, Conway v. Taylor. 
 FANT, PIEASANTS v. See Pleasants ■0. Fant. 
 FARMERS' BANK, BEASTON v. Beaston v. Farmers' Bank. 
 FARMERS AND MECH. BANK v. DEERrNG, 91 U. S. 81. 
 
 Constitution ; " supreme law of 
 the land." 6 
 
 States have no authority over 
 proceedings of the U. S. courts. 6 
 
 Usury, c. 
 
 a 95 U. S, 685, FarringtonwTenn. 
 6 98 U. S. 490, U. S. v. Thompson 
 c 98 U. S. 558, Barnet ». Bank, 
 c 100 U. S. 250, Gates u. Bank. 
 
 FARMERS AND MECH. BANK, DROMGOOtB v. See Dromgoole v. F and 
 
 M. Bank. 
 FARMERS AND MECH. BANK, GAIXHER v. See Gaitlier d. F. and M. Bank. 
 FARMERS AND MECH. BANK v. SMITH, 6 Wh. 131. 
 
 Constitution ; validity of State I a 6 H. 318, Bank ii. Sharp, 
 insolvent laws, a \ 
 
 FARMERS AND MER. BANK, KEAKT v. See Keary v. F. and M. Bank. 
 FARNET v. TOIVXE, 1 Bl. 351. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error i a 21 Wall. 550, Edwards v. Elliott, 
 to State courts; Federal question, a \ 
 
 FARNSWORTH v. MOT. AND PAC. R. K., 98 U. S. 49. 
 
 Land grants by Congress to rail- I o 97 U. S. 218, McMicken v. U. S. 
 roads ; forfeiture of grants, a \ 
 
 FAKRAGTJT, THE, 10, WaU. 337. 
 
 Collision ; loolwuts. a 
 Lights. 6 
 
 FARRAR X. U. S., 5 P. 373. 
 
 Official bonds ; sureties, a 
 
 a 23 Wall. 177, The Sea Gull. 
 
 h 92 U. S. 36, The City of W. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 436, The America. 
 
 a 10 P. 343, U. S. «. Bradley. 
 a 15 P. 374, U. S. u. Boyd. 
 a IH. 104, U. S. «. Linn, 
 a 12 H. 163, Ivesj). Bank. 
 
 FARRINGTON v. TENNESSEE, 95 U. S. 679. 
 
 Corporations ; shares, a | a 96 U. S. 196, Dewing v Perdicaries 
 
 FARWEM,, DONALDSON v. See Donaldson ■«. Farwell. 
 FARWELt, IMBUSCH v. See Imbusoli ■!,. FarweU. 
 FASHNACHT V. FRANK, 33 Wall. 419. 
 
 U. S. courts ; removals, a | a 94 U. S. 651, Lowe u. WiIIiam=. 
 
 FATIO, tJ. S. V. SeeU. S. o. Fatio. 
 FAW V. MARSTELLER, 3 Cr. 38. 
 
 Payments ; what an obligation to ( a 12 Wall. 548, Legal Tender Ca^. 
 p.ay money means, a " ■^'^">-"=» ^-^ 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 07 
 
 TAW V. ROBERDEAU, 3 Cr. 174. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error; 
 . agreed ease, a 
 
 Statute of limitations; "beyond 
 seas." 6 
 
 a 16 P. 296, U. S. v. Bliason. 
 a 20 H. 434, Snydam v. Williamson 
 a 18 Wall. 249. Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 6 97 U. S. 637, Davie v. Briggs. 
 
 FEAKSON, MASON v. See Mason v. Fearson. 
 FEAKSON, NTCHOI.I.S v. See NiehoUs v. Fearson. 
 FEDBBT, BEARD v. See Beard «. Federy. 
 FEI-IOWS V. BiACKSMTTH, 19 H. 366. 
 
 Indians ; removal of ; reserva- | a 21 II. 368, New York c. Dibble, 
 tions. a \a 5 Wall. 770, The N. Y. Indians. 
 
 ! a 17 Wall. 242, Holden v. Joy. 
 
 FBMON, TEAT. v. See Teal v. Felton. 
 FEIOf T. HOLME, 31 H. 483. 
 
 LT. S. conrts ; ejectment will not 
 lie on equitable title, a 
 
 Power of Congress in the dispo- 
 sition of the public land cannot be 
 obstructed by State legislation, b 
 
 a 23 H. 249, Hooper v. Scheimer. 
 a 24 H. 425, Sheerburn v. De Cor- 
 dova. 
 a 1 Bl. 346, Clagett v. Kilbourne. 
 b 13 Wall. 104, Gibsqti w. Chouteau 
 
 FENN", MYERS v. See Myers v. Fenn. 
 
 FENNO, VEAZEE BANK v. See Teazie Bank v. Fenno. 
 
 FENWTICK V. CHAPMAN, 9 P. 466. 
 
 Wills ; legacies ; executors, a 
 
 District of Columbia; decisions 
 of Maryland courts construing stat- 
 utes. ?) 
 
 FENWTtCK T. SEARS, 1 Cr. 859. 
 
 Administrator; suits in State I 
 other than where appointed, a \ 
 
 FERGUSON, TUCKER v. See Tucker v. Ferguson. 
 FERNANDEZ, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Fernandez. 
 FEBAET, U. S. v. See U. S. ■o. Ferary. 
 FERRBIRA, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Ferreira. 
 FERBY CO., ST. I/OUIS V. See St. Louis v. Ferry Co. 
 FERTILIZING CO. T. HYDE PARK, 97 U. S. 659. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; State grants ; construction 
 against grantee, a 
 
 FIEDLER, CUSTIS T. See Custis v. Fiedler. 
 FIELD V. HOLLAND, 6 Cr. S. 
 
 Application of payments, a 
 Equity ; reference to master. 
 Issues at law. c 
 
 a 1 H. 147, U. S. Bank v. Bevely. 
 6 5 H. 78, Miller v. Herbert. 
 
 a 15 P. 4, Vaughan v. Northup. 
 a 9 Wall. 400, Koonan v. Lee. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 561, Newton o. Com'rs. 
 
 a 5 P. 304, Page b. Patton. 
 6 20 Wall. 322, Memphis v. Brown, 
 c 92 U. S. 694, Garsed v. Beall. 
 a 04 U. S. 439, Bank v. Bank. 
 
 FIELD V. SEABURY, 19 H. 334. 
 
 Land titles ; patent ; how far 
 conclusive at law. a 
 
 Its effect cannot be controlled by 
 State courts. 6 
 
 a 20 H. 265, Spenser v. Lapslev. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 238, Tei-ritory v. Lock- 
 wood. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 798, Rubber Co.!). Good- 
 year. 
 
98 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 7 H. 844, U. S. v. King. 
 a 13 H. 195, Weems v. George. 
 a 17 H. 195, Arthui-s v. Hart. 
 6 9 Wall. 431, Flanders v. Tweed, 
 c 98 U. S. 490, U. S. v. Thompson. 
 
 FIELD V. U. S., 9 P. 208. 
 
 Waiver of jury ; objections to ad- 
 mission of evidence ; bill of excep- 
 tions, a 
 
 Lonisiima; writs of error from 
 Supreme Court U. S. b 
 
 Bule of decision, c 
 FIXES, POLLABD v. See Pollard v. Files. 
 FTLOB V. U. S., 9 WaU. 48. 
 
 U. S. ; liability for seizures dur- 1 a 13 Wall. 631, U. S. v. Bussell. 
 ing the civil war. a \ 
 
 EILLEBBOWN, V. S. v. See U. S. v. Fillebrown. 
 FINCH, UNIVERSITY v. See UniYersity ii. Finch. 
 FINCH, LAFAYETTE INS. CO. v. See Lafayette Ins. Go. u. Finch. 
 FINDLEY, BUCKNEB v. See Buckner v. Findley. 
 FINLAY M. KING, 3 P. 346. 
 
 Wills; conditions subsequent, a a 8 P. 326, King ». Mitchell. 
 
 Jury; province of. h 6 12 P. 374, Hepburn w. Dubois. 
 
 Estate to vest at earliest possi- a 14 H. 496, Webster v. Cooper, 
 ble moment; contingent remain- a 15 H. 400, McDonough v. Mur- 
 ders, c ' doch. 
 
 c 6 Wall. 475, Doe v. Consedine. 
 
 FINIEY V. BANK OF THE U. S., 11 Wh. 306. 
 
 Mortgages ; foreclosur'e ; par- I a 14 H. 32, Hagaii v. Walker, 
 ties, a I 
 
 FINIiEY, GAMiOWAY v. See Galloway v. Fin^^y. 
 FINI.EY V. lYNN, 6 Cr. 838. 
 
 Supreme Court ; decrees of. a 
 
 Equity ; jurisdiction ; mistakes. 6 
 
 a 19 H. 165, Dupont de Nemours v. 
 
 Vance. 
 a 11 Wall. 227, May v. Leclaire. 
 b 98 tr. S. 83, Ivinson v. Button. 
 
 FINLEY V. WHiUAMS, 9 Cr. 165. 
 
 Land titles; when courts of I a 13 Wall. 86, Johnson «. Towsley. 
 equity will go behind the patent, a \ 
 FIBMAN, BCBNHISEIi v. See Burnhisel v. Finnan. 
 
 FIBST MUNICIPAXITY, PEBMOLI v. See Pfermoli v. First Municipality. 
 FISHEB, BLIGHT v. See U. S. v. Fisher. 
 FISHEB, BEADLEY v. See Bradley v. Fisher. 
 FISHEB M. COCKEBELI., 5 P. 856. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error to a 10 P. 391, Crowell v. Eandell. 
 State courts ; how the Federal ques- a 13 P. 155, Reed u. Marsh, 
 tion must appear.^.; a a 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 Record ; what is so considered. 6 a 15 H. 2U7, Kanouse v. Martin. 
 
 6 16 Wall. 398, Burke v. Smith. 
 FISHEB, HAEDEN v. See Harden v. Fisher. 
 FISHEB, HEMMENWAY v. See Hemmenway u. Fisher. 
 FISHEB, liOCISIANA, THE v. See Loaisiana, The, v. Fisher. 
 FISHEB, BUTHBEFOED v. See Rutherford «. Fisher. 
 FISHEE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Fisher. 
 FISK, McKENNA v. See McKenna v. Fislc. 
 FISK, U. S. V. See U. S. o. I'isk. 
 FISIU5, BBOOKS T. See Brooks v. Fiske. 
 FISKE, SMYTHE v. See Smythe v. Fiske. 
 
 FITZHUGH, GENESEE CHIEF v. See Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh. 
 FITZHCGH, PBATT v. See Pratt v. Fitzhugh. 
 FITZPATBICK, LEVY v. See Levy v. Fitzpatrick. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 99 
 
 riTZSIMMONS -v. OGDEN, 7 Cr. 1. 
 
 Equity ; where equities are even, I a 10 P. 200, Boon v. Chiles, 
 the lirst in time first in riglit. a I 
 FLA>T)ERS, BIAH. CO. V. See Mail Co. u. Flanders. 
 ri-ASODEKS V. TWEED, 9 Wall. 485. 
 
 Trials without jury ; waiver of 
 jury; finding oi facts, a 
 
 Eevievv of by Supreme Court, b 
 
 Power of courts over their judg- 
 ments after writ of error, u 
 
 FLECKNEK V. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 282, Kearney v. Case. 
 a 16 AVall. 514, Tweed's Case. 
 b 17 Wall. 411, Reed v. Gardner. 
 6 18 Wall. 252, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 6 21 Wall. 160, Ins. Co. v. Sea. 
 c 21 Wall. 552, Edwards v. Elliott, 
 c 91 U. S. 251, Muller v. Ehlers. 
 6 93 U. S. 81, Ryan v. Carter. 
 
 BANK OF V. S., 8 WIl. 338. 
 
 a 9 P. 393, Bank v. Waggener. 
 
 b 14 P. 27, Bank v. Guttsclilack. 
 
 6 6 H. 318, Plant. B'k v. Sharp. 
 
 c 19 H. 318, Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. 
 
 c 21 H. 360, U. S. u. Bank of Col. 
 
 d 5 Wall. 781. Superv'sw. Schenk. 
 
 c 10 Wall. 650, Bank v. Banli. 
 
 e 92 U. S. 128, Bank v. Bank. 
 riEEGEB, POOI.E V. See Poole v. rieeger. 
 IXEaUNG V. PAGE, 9 H. 614. 
 
 Bank of the U. S.; construction 
 of its charter; usury, a 
 
 Corporations; contracts not un- 
 der seal, b 
 
 Agents; authority, c 
 
 Ratification, d 
 
 Banks ; power to deal in stocks, e 
 
 Character of the late' civil war; 
 de facto government, a 
 
 a 8 Wall. 10, ThoringtonwSmith 
 a 15 Wall. 447, Hannauer v. Wood- 
 ruff. 
 
 IXETCHEK, DATENPOKT t. See Davenport v. Fletcher. 
 
 FLETCHER V. PECK, 6 Cr. 138. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 ti-acts ; provision extends to con- 
 tracts in which a State is a party, a 
 
 A charter is a contract, b 
 
 Definition of a contract, c 
 
 Title of Indians to lands, d 
 
 Constitutionality of a law should 
 be decided in afiirmative in doubt- 
 ful case. « 
 
 Legislative powers; limits. /' 
 
 Ex post facto laws, ff 
 
 Title by grant, h 
 
 Retrospective laws, i 
 
 Supreme Court ; amendment of 
 transcript, j 
 
 a 7 Cr. 164, New Jersey D.Wilson. 
 6 4 Wh. 624, Dar. Col. v Woodward 
 c 8 Wh. 69, Green v. Biddle. 
 d 8 Wh. 571, Johnson v. Molntosli. 
 a 12 Wh. 117, Williams v. Norris. 
 e 12 Wh. 293, Ogden v. Saunders. 
 / 2 P. 407, SatterleewMatthewsou 
 6 4 P. 559, Prov. Bank v. Billings. 
 6 6 P. 691, U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 ^ 8 P. 108, Watson v. Mercer. 
 b 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 d 13 P. 200, Clark v. Smith, 
 a 6 H. 331, Bank v. Sharp. 
 h 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile. 
 i 10 H. 396, R. R. Co. v. Nesbit. 
 a 16 I-I. 376, Banku. Knoop. , 
 g 17 H. 461, Carpenter v. Penn. 
 j 18 H. 534, Hudgins v. Kemp. 
 6 1 Bl. 374, Rice v. R. E. Co. 
 g 4 Wall. 322, Cummings v. Mis'ri 
 a 4 Wall. 548, Van Hotfman v. 
 
 Quincy. 
 g 9 Wall. 38, Gut v. The State. 
 e 12 Wall. 531, Legal Tender Cas. 
 fl3 Wall. 213, Ponn. College Cas. 
 6 15 Wall. 489, Miller v. State. 
 6 16 Wall. 232, Davis v. Gray, 
 p 9/ D. S. 384, Burgess v. Salmon. 
 e 101 U. S. 410, Livingston Co. v. 
 
 Darlington. 
 
100 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKBMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 FLEPPIN, EX PAKTE, 94 TJ. S. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandamus. 
 
 3S0. 
 
 a I 
 
 FXORrDA V. GEORGIA, 17 H. 478. 
 
 Supreme Court; original jiins- 
 diotion ; political questions, a 
 
 IXOKINTINE V. BARTON, 9 Wall. 
 
 .Jnripdiot.ion ; Probate Courts, a 
 Void and voidable judgments. 6 
 
 a 08 U. S. 241, ex parte Sehwab. 
 a 102 U. S. 186, ex parte Perry. 
 
 I a 6 VV.ill. 73, Georgia v. Stanton. 
 I a 11 Wall. 54, Virginia v. West Va. 
 sio. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 406, Comstock v. Craw- 
 ford. 
 
 6 10 Wall. 316, Cooper e. Reynolds 
 
 IXOYD ACCEPTANCES, THE, 7 WaU. 676. 
 
 Negotiable paper; agents, a 
 U. S.; rights, when party to such 
 paper, b 
 
 FOLEY V. HARRISON, 15 H. 433. 
 
 Land titles from U. S.; when acts 
 of executive offlcers conclusive, a 
 
 Grants to the States ; when legal 
 title vests. 6 
 
 EOIiET, PORTER v. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 683, Marsh v. Fulton Co. 
 6 91 U. S. 390, Cooke w. U. S. 
 
 a 18 H. 284, Murray v. Hoboken Co 
 a 9 Wall. 798, Rubber Co. v Good- 
 year. 
 6 91 U. S. 333, Shepley v. Cowan. 
 See Porter v. Foley. 
 
 FOIiGER, HABICH v. See Habich «. Folger. 
 FOLSOM, INS. CO. V. See Ins, Co. v. Folsom. 
 FONTAIN V. RAVENAX, 17 H. 388. 
 
 Charities ; parens patrim. a | o 95 U. S. 310, Ould v. Hospital. 
 FOOTE, SUSBY v. See Silsby u. Foote. 
 FORBES V. GRACE, 94 U. S. 768. 
 
 Mining rights ; act of 1866. a [ a 101 U. S. 276 ; Broder v. Water. 
 FORBES, U. S. V. See U. S. i>. Forbes. 
 FORD, OEI.RICKS v. See Oelricks d. Ford. 
 FORD, STOCKTON v. See Stockton v. Ford. 
 FORD T. StJRGETT, 97 r. S. 694. 
 
 Civil war; personal liability of] 
 officers of the Confederacy, a 
 
 FORD V. "VrtLtlAJOS, 81 H. 889. 
 
 Agency ; parol evidence, a \ 
 
 a 100 U. S. 169, Dow v. Johnson. 
 
 FOKGAY V. CONRAD, 6 H. 801. 
 
 Appeals; Supreme Court; final 
 decrees, a 
 
 Defendant whose interest is sep- 
 arate need not join in appeal. 6 
 
 a 1 Wall. 241, Baldwin v. Bank. 
 a 5 Wall. 704, Nash v. Towne. 
 
 o 7 H. 656, Barnard v. Gibson. 
 
 allH. 28, U. S. jj. Giranlt. 
 
 a 18 H. 200, Craighead v. Wilson. 
 
 a 19 H. 284, Beebe v. Kussell. 
 
 b 22 H. 125, Brewster u.Wakeflold. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 531, Bronson v. R. R. Co. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 346, Thompson «. Dean. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 98, French c. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 
 6 20 Wall. l.'J7, Simpson J). Greeley. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 245, Fi-ench v. Hay. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 411, R.R. Co.t). Swasev. 
 FORREST, BIGELOW v. See Bigelow v. Forrest 
 FORSYTH, BALLANCE y. See Ballance v. Forsyth 
 FORSYTH, BARTON v. See Barton v. Forsyth 
 FORSYTH, BRYAN v. See Bryan v. Forsyth 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 101 
 
 rORSYTH. CHAPMAK v. See Chapman «. Forsyth. 
 FORSYTH, DREDGE v. See Dredge v. Forsyth. 
 FORSYTH, GREGG v. See Gregg v. Forsyth. 
 FOJISYTH V. KIMBAir, 91 U. S. 291. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; parol, a | a 95 U. S. 481, Brown v. Spofford. 
 FORSYTH, MEEHAIf t. See Meehan ». Forsyth. 
 FORSYTH T. tr. S., 9 H. 571. 
 
 Supreme Coiut; appellate juris- 1 a 1 Wall, 251, ex parte Vallandi- 
 dictiou. a \ gham. 
 
 FORT, RAIL-WAY CO. v. See Railway Co. ■;. Fort. 
 FORT SCOTT, CONVERSE v. See Converse v. Fort Scott. 
 FORTHtf A, THE, 3 Wi. 167. 
 
 Prize ; fraud o£ neutral ship-own- 1 a 5 Wli. 30, The Venus, 
 er; conceal nient of papers, a \ 
 
 FORTY-THREE GAXS. WHISKY, V. S. v. See U. S. ». 43 Gals. Whisky. 
 FOSDICK T. SCHAXX, 99 V. S. 835. 
 
 Railroads; mortgages; lieu of 
 vendor of rolling stock, a 
 
 Lease of personal property with 
 option to buy; conditional sales; 
 mortgage of future acquired prop- 
 erty, b 
 
 FOSSAT CASE, a "WaU. 649, 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; final- 
 ity of decree of District Court, a 
 
 FOSSATT, U. S. V. See U. S. ^. Fossatt. 
 FOSTER, CAIil/AWAY v. See Callaway v. Foster. 
 FOSTER V. DAYENPORT, 33 H. 345, 
 
 Constitution; tonnage tax. a | a 12 Wall. 214, St, Ton. Tax Cases 
 
 FOSTER V. GODDARD, 1 Bl. 618, 
 
 a 99 U. S. 256, Fosdick v. Car Co. 
 a 99 U. S. 260, Huidekoper v. R. 
 
 R. Co. 
 a 99 U. S. 345, Sage v. R. R. Co. 
 a 99 U. S. 392, Hale v. Frost. 
 6 102 U. S. 9, Myer v. Car Co. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 448, U. S. v. Billings. 
 a 8 Wall. 342, Alviso v. U. S. 
 
 Equity; proofs and allegations 
 must agree, a 
 
 FOSTER V. XEIXSON, 3 P. 354. 
 
 Construction of treaty with Spain 
 foracquisition of Florida ; validity of 
 grants by Spain after the cession, a 
 
 Actionof political branches of the 
 goveraraenr, ; when conclusive, b 
 
 Treaties; supreme law of the 
 land, c 
 
 a 7 Wall. 607, Agagam Co. v. Jor- 
 don. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 793, Rubber Co. v. Good- 
 year. 
 
 a 6 P. 706, U. S. v. Arredondo. 
 a 7 P. 82, U. S. V. Percheman. 
 a 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 a 12 P. 511, Garcia v. Lee. 
 a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island !). Mass. 
 6 13 P. 418, Williams u. Ins. Co. 
 a 14 P. 170, Keene v. Whittaker. 
 a 14 P. 360, Pollard v. Kibbe. 
 a 2 H. 601, Pollard v. Files. 
 a 3 H. 219, Pollard v. Hagan. 
 b 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 & 9 H. 143, V.S.v. Reynes. 
 c 19 H. 366, Fellowsu. Blacksmith 
 c 11 Wall. 621, Cherokee Tobacco. 
 a 11 Wall. 638, U. S. v. Lyude. 
 c 17 Wall. 247, Holden v. Joy. 
 6 92 U. S. 13-2, Phillips v. Payne, 
 c 93 U. S. 196, U. S, V. 43 Gallons, 
 c 100 U. S. 490, HauensteinwLyn- 
 ham. 
 
102 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 22 H. 488, Adams v. Prestan. 
 
 FOSTER, STKOUT v. Sei Strout v. Foster. 
 FOUBNIQUET, PERKEfS v. See Perlrins v. Fcramiquet. 
 FOUKNIQUET v. PERKINS, 7 H. 167. 
 
 Probate jurisdiction in Louis- I a 1(5 H. 85, Fourniquet v. Perkins, 
 iana. a \ 
 
 FOUVEKGNE T. NEW OBUELlUSrS, 18 H. 471. 
 
 Supreme Court; wiiere the law 
 of a State gives an appeal to the 
 Supreme Court of the State, this 
 court will not reverse its judgment 
 for any irregularities, a 
 
 FOWXE V. AUEXAICDEIA, 11 Wh. 390. 
 
 Evidence; demurrer to. a. a 12 Wh. 383, Ins. Co. v. Catlott. 
 
 a 20 H. 436, Suydam v. William- 
 son. 
 FOWXE, FAJBNBT v. See Famey v. Fowle. 
 
 FOWIiE T. liAWRASON, 5 P. 501. 
 
 a 19 H. 276, Hipp v. Bablii. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 618, Morgan v. Beloit. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 228, Oolrichs v. Spain. 
 
 FOWI.EB, ATHEKTOU V. See Atherton v. Fowler. 
 FOWIiEB V. BRANXLY, 14 P. 318. 
 
 Equity; no jurisdiction wiiere 
 complete remedy at law; objection 
 can be taken by the court, a 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice ; bona- 
 fide holders, a 
 
 fowi;ee, heceer v. 
 
 FOWLER V. IINDSET, 
 
 a 102 U. S, 
 See Hecker v. Fowler. 
 3 BaU. 411. 
 
 \ a 20 H. 366, Goodman v. Siraonds. 
 a 22 H. 108, Bank v-. Neal. 
 a 92 U. S. 342, Angle v. Ins. Co. 
 a. 94 U. S. 758, Collins v. Gilbert. 
 a 95 U. S. 483, Brown v. Spofford. 
 a 99 U. S. 441, Parsons v. Jackson 
 445, Swift V. Smith. 
 
 U. S. courts ; jm-isdiction where 
 a State is a party interested, a 
 
 FOWBEB V. BAPLEY, 16 Wall. 388. 
 
 District of Columbia ; landlord's I 
 lien. a. \ 
 
 FOWXER V. RATHBONE, 18 Wall. 
 
 General average, a 
 
 FOX T. OHIO, 6 H. 410. 
 
 Constitution; power of Congress 
 to coin mone}'. a 
 
 Crimes ; when punishable by 
 State as well as United States. 6 
 
 First ten amendments to the 
 Constitution do not apply to 
 States, c 
 
 FOX, U. 8. T. See U. S. v. Fox. 
 FOXCEAFT V. MAXXETT, 4 H. 370, 
 
 Evidence; recital of deed, a 
 U. S. court ; when governed by 
 State decisions. 6 
 
 a 1 P. 118, Georgia v. Madrazo. 
 a 5 P. 284, New Jersey u. N. Y. 
 a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 383, Beall v. White. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 400, Hobson v. Lord. 
 
 a 9 H. 526, U. S. v. Marigold. 
 b 14 H. 20, Moore v. Illinois, 
 c 20 H. 87, Withers v. Buckley, 
 c 7 Wall. 327, Twitchell v. Com- 
 monwealth, 
 c 21 Wall. 557, Edwards?;. Elliott 
 c 92 U. S. 552, U. S.w.Cruikshank 
 6 100 U. S. 390, expaHe Siebold. 
 
 a 8 H. 245, Clark v. Ins. Co. 
 b 12 H. 145, Eussell v. Southard. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 103 
 
 FOXAXL, ENGLISH v. See English v. Foxall. 
 FOYIiES, BARRY v. See Barry v. Foyles. 
 FRANCES, THE, 8 Cr. 418. 
 
 Prize ; capture oven-ides liens, a i a 6 Wall. 498, The Battle. 
 
 I a 7 Wall. 162, The Siren. 
 FRANK, FASHNACHT v. See Fashnaoht v. Frank. 
 FRANKLIN BANK v. OHIO, 1 Bl. 474. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- 1 o 2 Bl. 544, Wright v. Sill, 
 tracts; exemption from taxation, a \ 
 FRANKLIN CO., STEINES v. See Steines v. Franklin Co. 
 FBAZIER, GRIFFITH v. See Griffith v. Frazier. 
 FREEMAN, THE, v. BUCKINGHAM, 18 H. 188. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction; lien on 
 vessel for contract to transport 
 ciiigo; affreightment, a 
 
 Personal liability, b 
 
 a 10 H. S8, Vandewater v. Mills. 
 
 a 19 H. 165, De Nemours v. Vance. 
 
 6 20 H. 599, Taylor v. Carryl. 
 
 a 24 H. 392, Bncklev v. Cotton Co. 
 a 8 Wall. 329, Tlie Ladv Franklin 
 a 9 Wall. 519, The KeoUiik. 
 d 14 Wall. 602, Tlio Delaware. 
 
 FREEMAN, CHT LUNG v. See Chy littng u. Freeman. 
 FREEMAN v. HOWE, 84 H. 450. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction ; State and 
 Fedei'al courts, o 
 
 U. S. courts are the judges of the 
 meaning of the Constitution and 
 laws of Congress, b 
 
 Cross-bill ; ancillary and main- 
 tainable in Circuit Court independ- 
 ent of citizenship, c. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 340, Bnck v. Colbath. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 196, Iliggs v. John. Co. 
 
 6 6 Wall. 253, Mavoi' v. Cnopei-. 
 
 c 6 Wall. 750, U. U. Co. v. Cham- 
 berlain. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 716, Warson v. Jones. 
 
 c 14 Wall. 81, Christmas v. Rus- 
 sell. 
 
 c 16 Wall. 195, Bank v. Turnball. 
 
 c 16 Wall. 219, Davis v. Gray. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 393. New Or. ». S. S. Co 
 
 a 22 Wall. 2.53. Frenoli v. Hay. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 262, Bank v. Calhoun. 
 FREEMAN-, XJ. S. v. See U. S. v. Freeman. 
 FREER, SETM:oUR v. See Seymour ij. Freer. 
 FREIGHT TAX CASE. See State Freight Tax Case. 
 FREMONT, RAJXROAJD CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Fremont. 
 FREMONT V. U. S., 17 H. 543. 
 
 California ; Mexican land titles ; 
 graats on conditions, a 
 
 Failure to approve. 6 
 
 Authority to make grants, c 
 
 Proving grant, d 
 
 Survev ; when not necessary, e 
 
 How surveys made, f 
 
 Floating gi-ants. g 
 
 Judicial notice of the laws of 
 Mexico, h 
 
 There must be a grantee, i 
 
 FREMONT, U. S. v. See U. S. f. Fremont. 
 FRENCH, EX PARTE, 91 U. S. 433. 
 
 Supreme Court; tinal decrees, a | a 91 U. S. 488, Zeller v. Switzer. 
 
 18 H. 556, U. S. V. Maca. 
 18 H. 558, U. S. V. Larkin. 
 20 H. 60, U. S. V. Carabuston. 
 24 H. 351, U. S. V. Castro. 
 
 1 Wall. 404, U. S. V. Moreno. 
 
 5 Wall. 448, U. S. v. Armijo. 
 18 Wall. 267, Henshawu. Bissell 
 92 U. S. 476, Miller v. Dale. 
 97 U. S. 215, McMicken v. U. S. 
 OS U. S. 430, U. S. V. Perot. 
 
 i 101 U. S. 509, Hall u. Russell. 
 
104 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 FRENCH V. BANK OF COXUMBIA, 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice, a \ 
 
 FRENCH V. FTAN, 93 U. S. 169. 
 
 Swamp-lanil grants, a 
 
 FRENCH V. SHOEMAKER, 18 Wall, 
 
 Supersedeas, a I 
 
 FRENCH V. SHOEMAKER, 14 Wall, 
 
 Equity ; parties, a I 
 
 FRENCH V. SPENSER, 21 H. 838. 
 
 Laud titles; bounty land, a | 
 Estoppel by deed ; euuremeut. b \ 
 
 FRETZ V. BlXLl, 18 H. 466. 
 
 Admiralty; jurisdiction above 
 tide watei'. a 
 Proper parties to libel. & 
 
 FRETZ V. STOVER, 88 WaU. 198. 
 
 Agents ; eflff ct of the civil war on 
 powers, a 
 Payments in Confederate notes. 6 
 
 FRIENDSCHAFT, THE, 4 Wi. 107. 
 
 Prize ; property of commercial 
 house in enemy's country; rights 
 of neutrals, a 
 
 FRISBLE, MARQCEZ v. See Marquez v. Frlsbie. 
 FRISBIE V. WHITNEY, 9 Wall. 187. 
 
 Pre-emption ; character of title 
 acquired by mere settlement and 
 
 improvement as against the U. a 
 
 S. a 6 
 
 California land titles ; a c t of a 
 
 1851. 6 a 
 
 Wlien party is regarded as equi- c 
 
 table owner of public lands, c c 
 
 4 Cr. 141. 
 
 a 10 P. 573, Dickens v. Beal. 
 I a 97 U. S. 347, Martin v. Marks. 
 
 99. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 31, .Tei-ome v. McCarter. 
 a 93 U. S. S9, Kitchen w.Kandolpli 
 
 384. 
 
 a 04 U. S. 737, Jemmeu. McCarter. 
 
 a 22 H. 190, Maxwell «. Moore. 
 6 1 Bl. 355, Crewis v. Biircliam. 
 
 a 20 H. 297, Jackson v. Tliu Mag- 
 nolia. 
 6 1 Wall. 53, Comm'r-in-Chief. 
 a 4 Wall. 5G5, The Hino and Tre- 
 vor. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 431, Ins. Co. v. Davis. 
 6 99 U. S. 572, McBurneyu. Carson 
 
 a 3 Wall. 233, The Cheshire. 
 
 15 Wall. 86, Yosemite Case. 
 
 91 U. S. 338, Shepley v. Covvan. 
 
 92 U. S. 319, Br.Co.jj.K.E.Co. 
 S. 7Go, Newhall v. Sanger 
 S. 514, Atliertouu.Fowler 
 S. 581, Hosmer K. Wallace 
 S. 121, Wirth v. Branson. 
 S. 261, Simmon?, v. Wag- 
 ner. 
 
 92 U 
 
 96 U. 
 
 97 U. 
 
 98 U. 
 101 U. 
 
 FRITTON, MATS v. See Mays v. Trittoii. 
 FRONTIN, GUHiD v. See Guild v. Trontin. 
 FROST V. FROSTBURG COAI. CO., 84 H. 883. 
 
 Corporations : receivers ; dissolu- I a 14 Wall. 399, Bank Bethel v Bank 
 tion. a I 
 
 FRY, TEATON v. See Yeaton d . Fry. 
 FUENTES, GAINES v. See Gaines v. Fuentes. 
 FUENTES V. U. S., 88 H. 443. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles; gen- 
 
 uineness; proof of execution, a 
 Keoord evidence. & 
 
 a 24 H. 351, U. S. v. Castro. 
 a 1 Bl. 252, U. S. «. Kiiiglit. 
 a 1 Wall. 357, U. S. v. Auguisola. 
 a 1 Willi. 422, U. S. v. Yorba. 
 6 1 Wall. 745, Romero i;. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 105 
 
 FOTiliEKTON V. BAm^ OF U. S., 1 P. G04. 
 
 jSTegotiable paper ; noticu ; due 
 cliligeiice. a 
 Presentment. 6 
 
 a 2 P. 100, Williams v. Bank. 
 a 2 P. 543, Bank v. Carneal. 
 6 8 Wall. 649, Bank v. Banlv. 
 
 FITLTON, lliOYp V. See Lloyd v. Fulton. 
 FlILTON V. McAfee, 16 P. 149. 
 
 Writs of error to State court ; 
 liow Federal question must be 
 shown, a 
 
 a 7 H. 740, Smith v. Hunter. 
 a 10 H. 322, Henderson v. Tenn. 
 a 19 H. 389, Burke v. Gaines. 
 a 1 Wall. 517, Roosevelt v. Meyer 
 
 See Marine Bank v. Fnlton Bank. 
 
 FUITON BAH^K, MARINE BANK v 
 
 FtOLTON CO., MARSH v. See Marsh o. Fulton Co. 
 
 FULTON STEAMBOAT CO., SULIIVAN v. See Sullivan v. Fulton S. S, 
 
 FCRMAN V. NICHOIi, 8 WaU. 44. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- 
 tracts; agreement o£ State toaccept 
 billsof abiink in paj'mentof taxes, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs oJ error to 
 State courts ; Federal ctuestiou. 6 
 
 Co. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 382, Knox v. Bank. 
 
 b 14 Wall. 21, Steines v Franklin 
 
 6 20 Wall. 628, jVIurdock v. Mem- 
 phis. 
 
 6 21 Wall. 549, Edwards v. Ellioft 
 
 6 96 U. S. 442, Murray v. Charles- 
 ton. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 455, Keith v. Clark. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 532, Mount Pleasant v. 
 Beckwith. 
 
 FYAN, FRENCH v. See French u. Fyan. 
 GADSBT, LEVY v. See Levy v. G-adsby. 
 GADSBT, STANLEY v. See Stanley v. G-adsby. 
 GAFF, ETSTER v. See Eyster v. Gaff. 
 GAINES V. CHEW, 3 H. 619. 
 Equity; multifariousness, a 
 
 a98U. 
 6 99U. 
 
 Probate of wills; setting a.side ; 
 express trusts ; U. S. courts in Lou- 
 isiana; chancery jurisdiction. 6 
 
 U. S. courts; setting aside judg- 
 ments of State courts, c 
 GAJNES v. BUNK. See Games «. Stiles. 
 GAINES v. FCENTES, 93 V. S. 20. 
 
 Removals ; act 1875. a. 
 U. S. courts; jui'isdiction to set 
 aside judgments of State courts. 6 
 
 GAINES, HALE v. See Hale v. Gaines. 
 GAINES V. HENNEN, 34 H. 591. 
 
 Legitimacy; wills; probate, a | 
 
 GAINES V. NEW ORLEANS, 6 WaU. 
 
 U. S. courts ; probate cannot be i 
 collaterally assailed, a \ 
 
 GAINES V. NICHOLSON, 9 H. 356. 
 
 Grants by Congress to the States ; 
 when title vests; courts have no 
 power to define the land, a 
 
 Indian lands, b 
 GAINES, PATTERSON v. See Patterson v. Gaines. 
 GAINES, RAILROAB CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Gaines. 
 
 a 3 H. 396, Oliver v. Piatt. 
 6 6 H. 582, Patterson v. Gaines, 
 c 22 H. 488, Adams v. Preston. 
 6 24 H. 555, Gaines v. Hennen. 
 b 21 Wall. 512, Broderick's Will. 
 
 407, Boom Co. v. Pat- 
 terson. 
 83, Barrow v. Hunton. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 707, Gaines «. N. Orleans. 
 
 697. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 21, Gaines v. Fuentes. 
 
 a 18 H. 175, Cooper v. Roberts. 
 b 7 Wall. 247, Holden v. Joy. 
 
106 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 GAINES V. REJuV, 13 H. 473. 
 
 Will of Daniel Clai-ke {Gaines I 
 case); legitimacy; probate, a \ 
 
 GAINES V. THOMPSON, H Wall. 363 
 
 Mandamus ; 
 ers. a 
 
 a 24 H. 535, Gaines v. Hennen. 
 a G Wall. 711, Gaines w. N. Orleans 
 
 discretionary pow- 
 
 GAITHEK V. FARMERS' BANK, 
 
 Usury, a 
 
 9 Wall 
 
 9 Wall 
 
 93 U. S 
 
 a 101 U. S 
 
 1 P. 37. 
 
 la 7P, 
 I a 100 U 
 
 GAIBRAITH, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Galbraitli. 
 
 GAICERAN, lEON v. See Leon v. Galceran. 
 
 GAIENA T. AMY, S TTall. 705. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads ; mandamus by U. S. court to 
 
 compel levy of tax to i)ay. a 
 
 GAXLAGHEB, BASEY v. See Basey v. Gallagher 
 
 GALIAGHEB, COONS v. See Coons v. Gallagher. 
 
 GAU.AKD, HABCOCRT V. See Harcourt d. Gallard. 
 
 GAllATIN, FAIBEIEI,D v. See Fairfield v. Gallatin. 
 
 GAXLI, CASEY v. See Casey d. Galli. 
 
 GALLOWAY V. FESXEY, 13 P. 395. 
 
 Vendee ; disavowal of vendor's 
 title ; estoppel, a 
 
 Virginia military land warrants; 
 death at date of entry. 6 
 
 Sale of the land, c 
 
 Equity; light of purchaser to 
 good title, d 
 
 Equitj'; rescission, e 
 GALLOWAY, GALT v. See Gait v. Galloway 
 GALLUP, DAY V. See Day v. Ga,llup. 
 GAIPIN V. PAGE, 18 Wall. 369. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; notice by publica- 
 tion, a 
 
 312, Sec. uMcGarraliau 
 577, Litchfield v. Eeg'r 
 173, French v. Fyan. 
 475, Marquez v. Frisbie 
 
 103, Nichols V. Fearson. 
 S. 249, Gates w> Nat. Bank. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 483, Walkleyti. Muscatine 
 
 a 6 II. 288, Bush v. Marshall. 
 6 7 H. 206, McArthur v. Dunn, 
 c 22 H. 190, Maxwell v. Moore. 
 d 22 H. 327. Kedfield v. Woodfolk. 
 & 1 Wall. 439, Niswunger v. Sauti- 
 
 ders. 
 6 18 Wall. 427, Davenport v. Lamb 
 e 15 Wall. 379, Kimball v. West. 
 
 GAXT V. GAXIOW^AY, 4 P. 333. 
 
 Land; entry in name of dead 
 man. a 
 Evidence; records and entries, h 
 
 a 91 U. 
 a 97 U. 
 
 508, Earle v. McVeigh. 
 449, Settlemeir v. Sulli- 
 van. 
 
 a P. 261, McDonald v. Smalley. 
 a 12 P. 295, Gallowav v. Fhiley. 
 a 7 H. 266, McArthur v. Dunn. 
 a 13 Wall. 427, Davenports. Lamb 
 
 r-*T,.^=,,«^T " ^^9U. S. 067, Evanstowiiu.Guim 
 
 GALVESTON, HITCHCOCK v. See Hitclicook v. Galveston. 
 GALVESTON RAILROAD v. COWDREY, 11 Wall. 469. 
 
 Corporate officers; extraterrito- 
 rial acts, a 
 Railroad mortgages ; earnings. 6 
 
 a 16 Wall. 14, Lvnde v. Countv. 
 & 91 U. S. 617, Gilman «. Tel. Co. 
 b 99 U. S. 253. Fosdick v. Schall. 
 
 GAMACHE T. PIQUIGNOT, 16 H. 464, 
 
 Missouri land titles; act 1812 (2 | a 16 H. 507, Guitard v. Stoddard. 
 St. 748) ; town and village lots, a \ 
 
 GAMES V. STLLES, 14 P. 333. 
 
 Charge tn jury ; right of court to a 13 II. 128, Mitchell v. Harinonv 
 
 Dced-s recital of decree; whether a 91 U. S. 438, Niuld w Buito -<= 
 necessary to prove the decree. 6 a 95 U. S. 239; Ins. Co'. TlUM. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 107 
 
 GAIfTIiT V. EWING, 3 H. 709. 
 
 Execution sales; law of Indiana. 
 a 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; remetl}'. 6 
 
 GABCIA V. liEE, 13 P. 511. 
 
 U. S. Governraent ; wlien action 
 of political bi'anclies is conclusive, a 
 
 Spaiiisli grants west of Perdido 
 Kiver; grants after cession. 6 
 
 Complete grants, c 
 
 GARDNER V. COIilBCTOR, 6 Wall, 
 
 Statutes ; enactment ; how ascer- 
 tained, a 
 
 GARDNER V. COLI-INS, a P. 58. 
 
 Descent ; construction of Rhode 
 
 Island statute ; " whole blood." a 
 
 U. S. courts; rule of decision. & 
 
 GARDNER, POTTER t. See Potter v. G-arduer, 
 GARDNER, READ v. See Read v. Gardner. 
 GARXAND, EX PARTE, 4 "WaU. 378. 
 
 a 6 H. 20, Collier v. Stanborongh 
 6 24 H. 464, Howard v. Bugbee. 
 
 a 13 P. 418, Wiliiaras v. Ins. Co. 
 6 14 P. 171, Keene v. Wbittaker. 
 6 14 P. 360, Pollard v. Kibbe. 
 
 5 2 H. 601, Pollard v. Files. 
 
 6 3 H. 219, Pollard v. Hogan. 
 a 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 a 9 H. 143, U. S. v. Reynes. 
 c 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 6 11 Wall. 641, U. S. v. I.yude. 
 a 17 Wall. 243, Holden v. Joy. 
 a 92 U. S. 132, Phillips v. Payne. 
 
 511. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 269, South Ottawa v. 
 Perliins. 
 
 « 4 P. 392, Saunders v. G-ould. 
 
 6 44H. 31, Beals «. Hale. 
 
 b 14 H. 496, Webster v. Cooper. 
 
 Attorneys; admission and re- 
 moval of. a 
 
 Constitution ; bills of attainder 
 and ex post facto laws. 6 
 
 Pardon ; effect of. c 
 
 GARlAJfD V. DAVTES, 4 H. 131. 
 
 Verdicts ; what mistakes are cov- 
 ered by. a 
 
 Equity ; what defects are cured 
 by decree. 6 
 
 U. S.; no liability for torts, c 
 
 Error ; when it must appear that 
 exceptions were taken below, d 
 
 When exceptions are unnecessa- 
 ry, e 
 
 GARIiAND V. WTfNN, 30 H. 8. 
 
 Land titles; when jurisdiction 
 of land olflce noi exclusive of tlie 
 courts, a 
 
 Commissioner ; entries allowed 
 by the registers and receivers can 
 be set aside by. b 
 
 a 7 Wall. 535, Randell v. Brig- 
 ham. 
 6 8 Wall. 601, Drehman v. Stifle, 
 c 9 Wall. 542, U. S. v. Padeltord. 
 b 16 Wall. 239, Pierce v Caiskadon 
 a 19 Wall. 512, ex parte Robinson 
 c 95 U. S. 133, Knote v. U. S. 
 a 100 U. S. 198, Bank v. Ward. 
 
 a 5 H. 223, Jones v. Van Zant. 
 6 5 H. 277, Taylor v. Benham. 
 c 8 H. 101, U. S. V. Buchanan, 
 d 9 H. 370, Barrow v. Reab. 
 d 20 H. 433, Suydam v. Williamson 
 d 1 Wall. 600, Pomerov v. Bank. 
 e 3 Wall. 661, Rogers v. Bnrl'ton. 
 e 10 Wall. 261, R. R. Co. v Moi-gan 
 e 12 Wall. 403, Bank v. Clise. 
 e 16 Wall. 386, Ins. Co. v. Piaggio. 
 d 91 U. S. 130, Railroad u Trustees 
 a 91 U. S. 656, Phillips u. Seymour 
 d 94 U. S. 81, Storm v. U. S. 
 
 a 22 H. 202, Lytic v. Arlviinsas. 
 a 22 H. 339, Bjrtholdjj McDonald. 
 6 1 Bl. 325, Harknus:< v. Uuderhill 
 ffl 2 Bl. 558, Lindsey v. Hawes. 
 a 6 Wall. 418, Stark u. Starrs. 
 a 13 Wall. 85, Johnson v Towsley 
 
108 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 GAKNETT V. JENKINS, 8 P. 86. 
 
 Sup. Ct. ; writs of error to State 
 courts; Federal question, a 
 
 GARNETT v. U. S., 11 Wall. 857. 
 
 Confiscation, a 
 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 26G, McVeigh v. U. S. 
 all Wall. 344, Tyler v. Defrees. 
 
 GABRISON V. MEMPHIS INS. CO., 19 H. 318. 
 
 Subrogation, a [ aQ8 U.S. 539, Hooper ». Eobinsoi 
 
 GAKBISON, SAVIGNAC v. See Savignao v. Garrison. 
 GASIIGHI CO., KNOWXES v. See Knowles v. Gaslight Co. 
 GASSIES T. BALtOU, 6 P. 761. 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship; aver- I a IG H. 325, Mar^ihall v. K. R. Co 
 nient of. a I a 9 Wall. 565, Hornthall v. Col'r. 
 
 GAY, AVENDANDO v. See Avendando v. Gay. 
 GAT, MORGAN v. See Morgan v. Gay. 
 GAY'S GOIiD, 13 Wall. 681. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 27, Semmes v. U. S. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 521, ilonre v. Marsli. 
 a 10 Wall. 379, R. R. v. Trimble. 
 6 11 Wall. 552, Seymour v Osbonie 
 6 18 Wall. 124, U. S. v. Buzzo. 
 c 21 Wall. 225, Littlefleld v. Perry, 
 a 98 U. S. 549, HciKlrie b. Savles. 
 
 Confiscation, a 
 
 GAYIiER T. TFixDEK^ lo H. 477. 
 
 Patent law ; assignments j who 
 must bring action for infringe- 
 ment, a 
 
 Invention; desertion. 6 
 
 Recoi'dcd assignments; carry 
 the patent when issued, c 
 
 GAYLOKD V. KELSHAW, 1 Wall. 83. 
 
 Equity ; dismissal without preju- I a 7 Wall. 110, Durant v. Essex Co 
 dice, a I 
 
 GEAR, U. S. V. See U. S. ■!;. Gear. 
 GEARY, UNION BANK v. See Union Bank v. Geary 
 GEDDES, RUTHERFORD v. See Butlierford v. Geddes 
 GEE, BAKER v. See Baker v. Gee. 
 GEE, EVANS v. See Evans v. Gee. 
 GELPCKE V. DUBUQUE, 1 W^all. 175. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads ; power of legisla- 
 ture to authorize ; conditions in act ; 
 i-ecitals in tlic bonds ; authority to 
 issue ; bona-fide Iioldeis. a 
 
 Wlielher decisions of State courts 
 arc binding on U. S. courts if made 
 after issue of bonds. 6 
 
 Interest, c 
 
 Ratification by Legislature, d 
 
 Corporations; contracts; estop- 
 pel, e 
 
 a 1 Wall. 890, Me ver«. Muscatine. 
 a 3 Wall. 664, Rogers u. Burl'gton 
 b 4 Wall. 274, MitclielluBurl'gtoii 
 a 5 Wall. 784, Superv'su. Sclieiiciv 
 c 7 Wall. 105, Aurora v. We.-;t. 
 a 7 Wail. 183, Lee Co. v. Rogers. 
 d 7 Wall. 624, Beloit v. Morgan. 
 b 9 Wall. 486, Citv v. Lamson. 
 e 10 Wall. 645, Bank v. Banl<. 
 a 14 Wall. 296, Lexington u. Butler 
 al5 Wall. 373, Grand Chute v. 
 
 Winegar. 
 a 16 Wall. 465, Keunicott v. Supv. 
 a 16 Wall. 665, St. Joseph d Rogers 
 a 16 Wall. G77, R. R. Co. v. OtSe. 
 6 16 Wall. 690. Aleott v. Superv's. 
 a 17 Wall. 331, U. S. u. R. R. Co. 
 d 19 Wall. 678, Pine Grove v. Tal- 
 
 cott. 
 e 93 U. S. 514, Randolph v. Post. 
 6 94 U. S. 642, Com'rs v. Thayer. 
 c 98 U. S. 473, Amy v. Dubuque. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 109 
 
 GEISTON V. HOTT, 3 Wh. »46. 
 
 Adminilty ; proceeding in rem ; 
 decree, a 
 
 U. S.; wlien it can be repi-esented 
 in suits by agents. 6 
 
 Seizures by custom oflScers; prob- 
 able cause, c 
 
 Seizure may be bj' other per- 
 sons, d 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction, e 
 
 Wlien forfeitures to U.S. accnie.y 
 
 Sup. Ct. ; writ of error to Statu 
 coiu-t; direction of writ, g 
 
 New^States by revolutions ; recog- 
 nition belongs to political branches 
 of the government, h 
 
 Supersedeas, i 
 
 Jurisdiction, j 
 
 a 9 Wh. 362, The Appollon. 
 
 6 Wh. 738, Osborn v. Bank. 
 
 c 10 Wh. 246, U. S. V. Morris. 
 
 d 3 H. 204. Taylor v. U. S. 
 
 e 6 H. 378, Navigation Co. v Bank 
 
 / 8 H. 378, Caldwell ■«. U. S. 
 
 g 11 H. 456, Webster v. Reed. 
 
 h 14 H. 44, Kennett v. Cliambers. 
 
 g 3 Wall. 386, McGUurpuCom'w'h 
 
 'i 10 Wall. 201, Slaughter-Hoiise 
 Cases. 
 
 h 13 Wall. 049, While v. Hait. 
 
 /14Wall. 56, Henderson's Dis- 
 tilled Spirits. 
 
 c 17 Wall. 93, Averill v. Smith. 
 
 g 91 U. S. 147, Athei-ton v. Fowler 
 
 g 91 U. S. 661, Chimney Co. v. 
 Brass Co. 
 
 c 97 U. S. 643, Stacey v. Emery. 
 
 GEN. MUX. LNS. CO. v. SHERWOOD, 14 H. 351. 
 
 Marine insurance ; jettison; 
 "peril of the sea." a 
 Loss;. ''proximate cause." 6 
 
 GENEKAI, smith:. THE, 4 'Wli. 438. 
 
 Maritime contracts ; admiralty 
 jurisdiction, a 
 
 Master of ship ; hypothecation of 
 vessel in foreign port for lepairs and 
 supplies, b 
 
 Proceedings against domestic ves- 
 sel for supplies and repaii's. c 
 
 When the TJ. S. courts will en- 
 force the laws of the States, d 
 
 a 17 H. 105, Lawrence v. Minturn. 
 
 a 9 H. 684, The Portsmouth. 
 
 6 12 H. 199, Ins. Co. v. Trans. Co. 
 
 a 7 P. 324, Peyroux v. Howard, 
 a 3 H. 573, Andrews v. Wall, 
 a 5 H. 452, Waring v. Clark. ' 
 a 6 H. 378. Navigation Co. v. Bank 
 c 17 H. 599^ Hays v. Steamsliip Co. 
 6 19 H. 25, Thomas e. Osborn. 
 c 21 H. 251, Magnire v. Card, 
 c 1 Bl. 529, The St. Lawrence. 
 a 7 Wall. 643, The Belfast. 
 6 9 Wall. 136, The G-rapeshot. 
 6 10 Wall. 200, The Lulu, 
 c 10 Wall. 211, The Kaloiama. 
 d 13 Wall. 243. ex parte McNeil. 
 6 20 Wall. 163, Ins. Co. v. Baring, 
 c 20 Wall. 217, The Lottowanna. 
 c 21 Wall. 571, The Lottowanna. 
 
 GENEBES T. BONNEMEB, 7 Wall. 564. 
 
 U. S. courts ; trial without jury ; 
 statement of facts, a 
 
 Supreme Court; power of court 
 below over the case after writ of 
 error, b 
 
 Bills of exceptions, c 
 
 a 8 Wall. 376, AvendandouGray 
 a 13 Wall. 3, Bethell U.Mathews 
 a 18 Wall. 252, Ins. Co. i'. Folsom. 
 6 21 Wall. 552, Edwards v. Elliott 
 b 91 U. S. 251, MuUor v. Elilers. 
 c 97 U. S. 320. Herbert u. Butler, 
 c 102 U. S. 354, Hnnnioutt v. Pey- 
 ton. 
 
 GENEBES v. CAMPBEtL, 11 Wall. 193. 
 
 Bills of exceptions, a 
 
 a 93 U. S. 555, Stanton v. Embrey 
 a 97 U. S. 320, Herbert u. Butler. 
 
110 
 
 MANUAL 01' SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 GENESEE CHIEF V. FITZHUGH, 13 H. 450. 
 
 Admiiiilty ; iurisdiction over the a 12 H. 468, Fretz ». Bi^ill 
 lakes anil navigable rivers. 
 
 a 
 
 Collision ; stearaboats and. sailing 
 vessels. 6 
 
 Lookouts, c 
 
 Navigable streams ; when public 
 highways, d 
 
 Attachment of vessels by State 
 court ; not proceeding in admiral- 
 ty, d 
 
 6 18 H. 224, The New York v. Rae 
 a 20 H. 297, Jacks'nuThe Magnolia 
 o 21 H. 245, Allen «. Newbeny. 
 6 21 H. 385, Steam. Co. ». Rnmball 
 h 22 H. 472, Trans. Co. ». Nav. Co. 
 a 1 Bl. 379, Propeller Commerce, 
 c 3 Wall. 273, Tlie Ottowa. 
 a 4 Wall. 562, The Hine & Trevor. 
 6 7 Wall. 201, Tl)e Grace Giicller. 
 d 7 Wall. 288. R. R. v. Scliurraeir. 
 a 7 Wall. 039, The Belfast. 
 a 8 Wall. 20, Tiie Eagle. 
 6 9 Wall. 422, Tlie Fairbanks. 
 a 10 Wall. .563, The Daniel Ball. 
 a 11 Wall. 24, Ins. Co. u. Dunham 
 c 13 Wall. 479, Tlie Ari.idne. 
 d 15 Wall. 384, Pennvwit v. Eaton. 
 a 16 Wall. 531, Steamboat v. Chase 
 a 18 Wall. 304, Atkins -u. Disinte- 
 grating Co. 
 ffi 05 U. S. 72, eK^arfe Easton. 
 
 GENOA V. ■WOODRUFF, 9» U. S. 602. 
 
 Interest, a | a 94 U. S. 441, Bank «. Bank. 
 
 Bonds ; coupons. 6 | & 98 U. S. 473, Amy v. Dubuque. 
 
 GEORGE, THE, 8 Wi. 878. 
 
 Prize ; collusive captures, a | a 8 Wh. 261, The Experiment. 
 GEORGE, WEEMS v. See Weems v. G-eorge. 
 GEORGETOWN v. ALEXANDRIA CANAI. CO., 18 P. 98. 
 
 Nuisances; equity jurisdiction. a\a 9 H. 25, Irwin v. Dixion. 
 
 I a 13 H. 557, Penn. v. Bridge Co. 
 GEORGETOWN, GOSZLER v. See Goszler v. Georgetown. 
 GEORGETOWN, HANNIWINKIE v. See Hanniwlnkle v. Georgetown. 
 GEORGETOWN AND ALEX. TURN. CO., CUSTIS v. See Custis u. George. 
 
 and Alex. Turn. Oo. 
 GEORGIA, ALABAMA v. See Alabama v. Georgia. 
 GEORGIA T. BRAILSFORD, 8 Dall. 408. 
 
 Supreme Court ; jurisdiction a 1 P. 110, Georgia v. Madrazn. 
 where State is a party, a a 5 P. 284, New .Jersey u N Y 
 
 Equity; injunctions. 6 6 9 P. 25, Irwin u. Dixion. 
 
 a 24 H. 95, Kentuck'j'^ v. Dennison 
 GEORGIA, CENT. R. R. & BANK. CO. v. See Cent. E. R. & Bank. Co. v. Ga. 
 GEORGIA, CHISLOMN v. See Chislomn v. Georgia'. 
 GEORGIA, CHEROKEE NATION v. See Cherokee Nation v. Georgia. 
 GEORGIA, FLORIDA v. See Florida u. Georgia. 
 GEORGIA, MADRAZO v. See Madrazo v. Georgia. 
 GEORGIA, SOUTH CAROLINA v. See South Carolina ■«. Georgia. 
 GEORGIA, WORCESTER v. See Worcester v. Georgia. 
 
 GEORGIA STATE BA3JK, KENNEDY v. See Kennedys. Georgia State Bank. 
 GERMAIN V. MASON, 18 Wall. 861. 
 
 deer 
 
 icrees''™a ^°'""' ' ''''^^^^^* ' ^°'"' I " ^° ^''"- ^^^' Simpson v Greeley 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 Ill 
 
 GHISEL.IN, lAMBERT v. See Lambert v. Ghiselin. 
 GIBBES, MoBLAIK v. See MeBlair v. Gibbes. 
 GIBBES, "WHYTE v. See Whyte v. Gibbes. 
 GIBBES, WIXMAjMS v. See "Williams i;. Gibbes. 
 GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 6 "WTi. 448. 
 
 Sap. Com-t ; final decree, a | a 18 H. 86, Verilen v. Coleman. 
 
 GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 9 Wli. 1. 
 
 Constitution ; tonnage tax ; reg- 
 ulation of commerce ; inspection 
 laws, a 
 
 Adoption oi State law as to pilot- 
 age. 6 
 
 Police power, c 
 
 Extent of the judicial power of 
 the U. S. d 
 
 Enrollment and licensing of 
 vessels engiiged in coasting trade ; 
 act of Feb. 17, 1793. e 
 
 Power of the States to tax. / 
 
 Implied powers under the Con- 
 stitution, g ' 
 
 When powers of Congress ex- 
 clusive; commerce, h 
 
 Supreme Court ; when it will 
 enter up a judgment, i 
 
 Quarantine laws, j 
 
 Beserved powers of the States, k 
 
 GIBBONS V. tJ. S., 8 WaU. 869. 
 
 U. S.; laches, a 
 Not liable for torts- b 
 
 13 Wh. 419, Brown v. Maryland 
 
 10 P. 117, Hobart v. Drogan. 
 
 11 P. 130, New York v. Mihi. 
 
 12 P. 72, U. S. V. Coombs. 
 
 12 P. 714, Rhode Ishmd v Mass. 
 15 P. 503, Groves v. Slaughter. 
 3 H. 219, Pollard v. Hagan. 
 
 H. 573, License Cases. (Opiii. 
 
 Tanej', Ch. J.) 
 7 H. 392, Passenger Cas. (Opin. 
 McLean, J.) 
 
 14 H. 572, Veazie v. Moore. 
 21 H. 246, Allen v. Newberry. 
 
 21 H. 251, Maguire v. Card. 
 
 22 H. 238, Sinnot v. Davenport. 
 
 1 Bl. 633, Conway v. Tailor. 
 
 3 Wall. 417, U. S. v. Holliclay. 
 
 3 Wall. 570, The Mahawk. 
 
 3 Wall. 725, Gilnian v. Phila. 
 10 Wall. 565. The Daniel Ball. 
 12 Wall. 214, St. Tax. Ton. Cas 
 12 Wall. 429, Ward v Maryland. 
 12 Wall. 550, Legal Tender Cas 
 
 15 Wall. 279, Stale Freight Tax 
 
 16 Wall. 03, Slaughter -Honse 
 
 Cases. 
 
 16 Wall. 475, Morgan v Parham 
 
 17 Wall. 291, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 17 Wall. 568, K. R. v. Fnller. 
 19 Wall. 582, Peete v. Morgan. 
 92 U. S. 271, Henderson v. The 
 
 Mayor of N. Y. 
 k 92 U. S. 551, U.S. MCriiil;sli;ink 
 a 94 U. S. 247, Foster!). New Orl. 
 95 U. S. 472, R. R. v. Husen. 
 
 95 U. S. 488, Hall v. De Cuir. 
 
 96 U. S. 387, Wise. v. Diiluth. 
 
 97 U. S. 503, Patterson v. K'y. 
 99 U. S. 282, Trans. Co. v. 
 
 Wheeling. 
 S. 544, Lord v. S. S. Co. 
 S. 574, WUson v. McNa- 
 niee. 
 h 102 U. S. 698, Mobile v. Kimball. 
 
 a 102 U. 
 6 102 U. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 398, Cooke u. U. S. 
 6 93 U. S. 257, Whiteside v. U. S. 
 6 95 U. S. 318, Hart; i. U. S. 
 6 101 U. S. 346, Langford v. U. S. 
 
112 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 GIBSON, BARNAKD V. 
 GIBSON, BRABSTON v. 
 
 See Barnard v. Gibson. 
 See Brabston v. Gibson. 
 
 GIBSON V. CHEW, 16 P. 315. 
 
 Circuit Coiiit U. S.; snit.s by as- 
 signees; section 11 judiciary act. a 
 
 a 5 H. 288, Pliillips v. Preston. 
 a 19 Wall. 83, Morgan v. Gay. 
 
 GIBSON V. CHOUTEAU, 8 Wall. 317. 
 
 Snpi-eme Coni-t ; writs of error to I a 21 Wall. 639, Moore v. Mississippi. 
 State conrts; Federal question, a \ 
 
 GIBSON V. CHOUTEAU, 13 Wall. 99. 
 
 Land titles ; patent ; power of 
 Congress cannot be interfered with 
 by State legislation., a 
 
 Fictions. 6 
 
 Po.ssession of the public land 
 cannot be adverse to the govern- 
 ment, c 
 
 I-imitations ; do not bar U. S. d 
 
 GIBSON, KENNEDY T. See Kennedy v. Gibson. 
 GIBSON, MURRAY v. See Murray v. Gibson. 
 GIBSON, PENNINGTON v. See Pennington v. Gibson, 
 GIBSON V. STEVENS, 8 H. 397. 
 
 Sales of pei'sonal property ; sym- 
 
 &. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 531, Langdean v. Hanes. 
 b 92 U. S. 766, Newhall v. Sanger, 
 c 95 U. S. 557, Morrow J). Whitney. 
 d 98 U. S. 488, U. S. v. Thompson. 
 
 bolical delivery, a 
 Bills of lading; indorsement. 
 
 GIBSON T. WARDEN, 14 WaU. 844. 
 
 Bankruptcy; assignee takes sub- 
 jciA to equities, a 
 
 a 1 Bl. 483. Leonard v. Davis. 
 a 11 Wall. 564, Halliday v. Ham- 
 ilton. 
 
 6 14 Wall. 106, The Thames. 
 a 100 U. S. 128, Hatch v. Oil Co. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 576, Longstrethw. Pen- 
 nock. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 178, Burnhisel v. Fir- 
 man. 
 a 95 U. S. 766, Teatman v. Sav. 
 Inst. 
 S. 487, Casey v. Cavaroc. 
 S. 352, Ci-eswell v. Lana- 
 
 han. 
 S. 739, Stewart v. Piatt. 
 
 a 96 U. 
 a 101 U. 
 
 a 101 U. 
 GIHON, SWARTOUT v. See Swartout v. Gihon. 
 GILBERT, COLtlNS V. See Collins v. Gilbert. 
 GILBERT V. U. S., 8 Wall. 360. 
 
 U. S.; contracts under laws, a \aS Wall. 490, Parish v. U. S 
 GILES, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Giles. 
 GILL T. OLIVER, 11 H. 589. 
 
 Writs of error to State court; 
 
 Federal question, a 
 
 rt belongs to a State court to in- 
 terpret its own statutes, b 
 
 Award by commission ; rights of 
 opposing claimants to share, c 
 
 a 12 H. 119, Williams v. Oliver. 
 6 17 H. 229, McBlair v. Gibbes. 
 6 17 H. 249, Williams v. Gibbes. 
 c 20 H. 535, Williams v. Gibbes. 
 c 24 H. 320, Meyer v. White 
 a 6 Wall. 262, Millingar v. Hartu- 
 pee. 
 
MANDAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 113 
 
 GHX T. WELMS, 88 WaU. 1. 
 
 Patent law ; combinations, a a 23 Wa]l. 367, Keedy «. Scott. 
 Reissued patents. 6 6 23 Wall. 558, Collav Co. u.Van 
 
 Dnsen. 
 a 9-t U. S. 202, Dnnbar v. Myers. 
 a 94 U. S. 297, Fuller v. Yentzev. 
 a 98 U. S. 39, Bates v. Coe. 
 b 98 U. S. 139, Powder Co. ^. 
 
 Powder Co. 
 a 101 U. S. 656, Imhansero.Bnerk 
 
 GHXETTE T. BUIXARD, 80 WaU. 571. 
 
 Sureties on removal bonds ; lia- | a 101 U. S. 15, Babbitt v. Finn, 
 bility. a. \ 
 
 GUXIS, V. S. T. 
 
 i TJ. S. V. G-fflis. 
 
 GLLMAJf, BROTFIT v. See Brown i). Oilman. 
 GTT.TVTAJf T. HX. & MIS. TEX. CO., 91 U. S. 603. 
 
 Mortgagees ; right to income and 
 earnings, a 
 
 a 94 U. S. 800, Am. Bridge Co. v. 
 
 Heidelbach. 
 a 99 IT. S. 253, Fosdick v. Schall. 
 
 GLLMAN V. FHTT.ADEI.PHIA, 3 WaU. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- a 
 
 j»«rce; what legislation State may a 
 
 enact, a a 
 
 Bridges ; when obstructions to a 
 
 navigation. 6 a 
 
 Relations between the States and h 
 
 general government, c a 
 
 Police power, d a 
 
 GrLMAN V. RIVES, 10 P. 898. 
 
 Demurrers ; judgments on. a I 
 
 GH-MAN V. SHEBOYGAN, 8 Bl. 514 
 
 Taxation ; uniformity, a 
 Exemptions. 6 
 
 713. 
 
 6 Wall. 42, Crandell » Nevada 
 10 Wall. 564, The Daniel Ball. 
 13 Wall. 240, ex parte McNiel. 
 15 Wall. 279. St. Fr. Tax Case. 
 17 Wall. 569, E.R. Co. «. Fuller. 
 21 Wall. 392, Atleew. Packet Co. 
 
 91 U. S. 34, Bank ». Dearlng. 
 
 92 U. S. 272, Henderson v. The 
 Mayor. 
 
 S. 10, S. Carolina e. Ga. 
 S. 242, S.S.Co.u. Tinker. 
 S. 24S, FosteruN.Orleans 
 S. 463, Pound v. Turk. 
 S. 4S8, Hall V. De Cuir. 
 S. 387, Wisc'slnw.Duluth 
 S. 503, Patterson c. Ken'y 
 S. 701, Mobile v. Kimball. 
 
 93 U. 
 
 94 U. 
 
 94 U. 
 
 95 U. 
 
 95 U. 
 
 96 U. 
 
 97 U. 
 102 U. 
 
 7 Wall. 99, Aurora ». West. 
 91 U. S. 534, Goulds. Railroad. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 675, P. Grove v. Talcott 
 b 93 U. S. 598, R.R. v. Superv'rs. 
 b 100 U. S. 561, Newton?). Com'rs, 
 
 GILMEB v. POINBEXTEB, 10 H. 867. 
 
 Ejectment, a 
 GILMOEE, GBOVE v. See Grove v. Brian. 
 GILMOBE, V. S. V. See U. S. «. Gilmore. 
 GIBARD, VrDAX v. See Tidal v. Girard. 
 GIRAULT, V. S. V. See U. S. u. Girault. 
 GIKOD, MICHOUD v. See Michoud d. Qirod . 
 8 
 
 a 94 U. S. 775, Hogan v. Kurtz. 
 
114 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 1 Wli. 238, L'lnvincible. 
 6 8 H. 531, Williamson u. Berry 
 c 3 Wall. 162, The Tliompson. 
 c 3 Wall. 612, The Admiral. 
 d 16 Wall. 342, Merrill u. Petty. 
 c 99 U. S. 35, U. S. u. Ames, 
 c 101 U. S. 458, The City of Pana- 
 ma. 
 
 a 13 H. 266, Vilemont v. U. S. 
 h 17 H. 552, Fremont «. U. S. 
 
 GI/ADDING-, STEVENS v. See Stevens v. Gladding. 
 GLADMON, KAJDLBOAI* CO. v. See Railroad Co. ■!!. Gladmon. 
 GI/ASS X. THE BETSY, 3 Dall. 6. 
 
 Prize; aclmiralty; conrts of neu- 
 tral ; iurisdiction of captures in vio- 
 lation of its neutrality, a 
 
 Jurisdiction. 6 
 
 Of District Court in questions of 
 prize ; probable cause, c 
 
 Appeals to Supreme Court, d 
 
 GtESrN V. r. S., 13 H. 350. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; act March 
 26, 1804; (2 St. 283;) settlements 
 subsequent to December 20, 1803. a 
 
 Incomplete Spanish grants, h 
 
 GLEinST V. IjANGDON, 98 V. S. 80. 
 
 Bankruptcy; rights of assignee I a 102 U. S. 649, Trimble v. Wood- 
 to property of bankrupt, a \ head. 
 
 GLOVEB, BAILEY v. See Bailey v. Glover. 
 GODBE, YOUNG v. See Young u. Godbe. 
 GODBABD, EOSTEE v. See Foster v. Goddard. 
 GODDABD V. OBDWAY, 101 TJ. S. 746. 
 
 Supreme Court; supersedeas, a | a 102 U. S. 371, Draper v. Davis. 
 GODDABD, BICHABDSON v. See Rioliardson v. Goddard. 
 GODDADD, SAXMON EAXIS CO. v. See Salmon FaUs Co. v. Goddard. 
 GODEBEY, DAWSON v. See Dawson o. Godfrey. 
 GODFBEY V. EAMES, 1 WaU. 317. 
 
 Patent law ; application for pat- r a 93 U. S. 500, Smith v. Goodyear 
 
 Dental Co. 
 
 GOtD MINING CO. V. NAT. BANK, 96 V. S. 640. 
 
 Corporations; ultra vires; who 
 can set up invalidity of convey- 
 ances, a 
 
 I U. S. 628, National Bank ». 
 Mathews. 
 
 GOLD WASHING CO. v. KEYES, 96 U. S. 199. 
 
 Removals; "case arising under 
 the Constitution and laws ; " act of 
 1875. a 
 
 a 102 U. S. 140, Railroad Coni'y ». 
 Mississippi. 
 
 GOMEZ, CASTBO v. See Castro v. Gomez. 
 GOMEZ, r. S. V. See U. S. v. Gomez. 
 GOOD V. MABTIN, 95 XJ. S. 90. 
 
 Territorial courts ; liovv far af- 
 fected by statutes in reference to 
 conits of the U. S. ; courts of the 
 Di'^trict of Columbia, a 
 
 GOODING, U. S. V. See U. S. «. Gooding. 
 
 o 102 U. S. 668, Page v. Burnstino. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 115 
 
 GOODMAI^^ V. SmONDS, 80 H. 366. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; blanks ; im- 
 plied aiithoi-ity to fill; rights of 
 l)ona-Jide holders, a 
 
 Notice. 6 
 
 Hypothetical cliar^e. c 
 
 Negotiable paper taken as collat- 
 t>ral secnritj' ; usual eour.se of busi- 
 ness; prior equities, d 
 
 a 22 H. 108, Bank v. Neal. 
 a 2 Willi. 121, Murray w. Lard ner 
 a 5 Wall. 784, Superv. v. Schenck 
 a 7 Wall. 735, Texas v. White. 
 a 9 Wall. 551, Bank v. Eldred. 
 6 10 Wall. 202, The Lulu. 
 c 14 Wall. 448, Im. Co. v. Mtimsoii 
 c 16 Wall. 389, Ins. Co, v. Piaggio. 
 a 19 Wall. 1G6, Sawyer v. Pricketn 
 c 20 Wall. 162, Ins. Co. ©.Baring. 
 a 21 Wall. 323, Chambers y. Clews 
 a 21 Wall. 359, Hotchkiss B.Banks 
 a 22 Wall. 594, Ross w. Jones. 
 a 92 U. S. 331, Angle v. Ins. Co. 
 a 94 U. S. 286, Com'ers v. Clark. 
 a 94 U. S. 754, Collins v. Gilbert. 
 a 95 U. S. 479, Brown v. Spotlord. 
 a 97 U. S. 24, Hotel Co. v. Wade 
 d 100 U. S. 247, Gates ». Bank. 
 a 101 U. S. 564, Shaw v. K. R. Co. 
 a 102 U. S. 444, Swift v. Smitli. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 100, Aurora v. West. 
 I a 91 U. S. 533, Gould v. R. R. 
 
 GOODTllCH V. CITY, 5 WaU. 573. 
 
 Demurrer; judgment; on ; consti- 
 tutes a bar. 
 
 GOODTITLE V. EXBBE, 9 H. 477. 
 
 Riglit of the States to land below i a 13 H. 26, Doe v. Beebe. 
 tidi- water, o | a 94 U. S. 338, Barney v. Keokuk 
 
 GOODTEAK DEN. CO., SMITH T. See Smith i). Goodyear Den. Co. 
 GOODTEAK, KUBBER CO. v. See Eubber Co. v. Goodyear. 
 GOODWIN, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Goodwin. 
 GORDON V. APPEAI. TAX COURT, 3 H. 144. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; exemption from taxation, a 
 
 Power of State Legislature to 
 bind the State by contract. 6 
 
 Taxation of Corporations ; when 
 stockholders are included in exemp- 
 tion, c 
 
 a 6 H. 332, Bank v. Sharp. 
 a 16 H. 376, Bank v. Knoop. 
 6 16 H. 429, Ins. Co. v. Debolt. 
 6 1 Bl. 442, Bank v. Skelly. 
 c 4 Wall. 259, People v. Com'rs. 
 a 8 Wall. 438, Home v. Rouse. 
 a 13 Wall. 376, Salt Co. v. East 
 
 Saginaw. 
 a 21 Wall. 498, R. R. Co. v. Penu. 
 a 95 U. S. 690, Farrington v. Tenn. 
 
 GORDON V. CAXDCLEUGH, 3 Cr. 868. 
 
 Sup. Ct. : writ of error to State 1 a 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones, 
 court; Federal question, a | a 1 Wall. 517, Roosevelt v. Meyer. 
 
 GORDON, CANAI. CO. v. See Canal Co. u. Gordon. 
 GORDON V. LONGEST, 16 P. 97. 
 
 "Value of matter in dispute," 
 under the n.-moval acts, and the 
 acts regulating appeals, a 
 
 Removals. 6 
 GORDON T. OGDEN, 3 P. 33. 
 
 Value of matter in dispute; re- 
 moval ; review by Supreme Court 
 of judgment of State court refus- 
 ing to remove, a 
 
 a 15 H. 207, Kanouse v. Martin. 
 6 19 Wall. 223, Lis. Co. ». Dunn. 
 6 100 U. S. 317, Virginia v. Rives. 
 b 102 U. S. 136, R. R. Co. v. Miss. 
 
 a 15 H. 207, Kanouse v. Martin. 
 a 17 H. 21, Olneyw. Tlie Falcon. 
 a 4 Wall. 164, Walker v. U. S. 
 a 16 Wall. 344, Merrill v. Petty. 
 a 91 U. S. 366, The D. R. Martin. 
 a 95 U. S. 695, Thompson v Butler 
 
116 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKBMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 GORDON, U. S. V. See U. S. u. G-ordon. 
 GORDON T. V. S., 2 WaU. 561. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals from a 6 Wall. 576, U. S. v. Alire. 
 
 Court of Claims, a a 13 Wall. 145, U. S. v. Klein. 
 
 Organization of the Court of a 22 Wall. 647, U. S. v. O'Grady. 
 
 Claims. 6 6 101 U. S. 345, Langford v. U. S. 
 
 GORDON V. V. S., 7 WaU. 193. 
 
 U. S. contracts ; reference of i a 94 U. S. 400, Chorpenningu. U. S. 
 claims to boards ; awards, a 
 
 GORHAM CO. 
 
 Trade-marks. 
 
 . WHITE, 14 WaU. 611. 
 
 a I a 90 U. S. 256, McLean v. Fleming. 
 
 GORMAN, BOARD OF COM'KS v. See Board of Commissioners v. Gorman. 
 GORMAN V. lENOX, 15 P. 116. 
 
 a 20 H. 426, Suydam v. Williamson 
 a 3 Wall. 661, Rogers v Burlington 
 a 7 Wall. 91, Aurora », West. 
 a 91 U. S. 527, Gould v. R. R. Co. 
 
 Supreme Court; may review a 
 judgment sustaining or overruling 
 demurrer, by writ of error without 
 any bill of exceptions, a 
 
 GOSZIiER T. GEORGETOWN, 6 Wh. 696. 
 
 Municipal corporations ; power I o 10 H. 532, East Hartford v. Hart- 
 over the streets ~ ' .-_.-_ 
 
 GOULD V. REES, 16 WaU. 194 
 
 Patent law ; patent for combina- 
 tion, a 
 
 GOtILD, SAUNDERS v. See Saunders v. Gould. 
 GRACE, EORBES v. See Forbes v. Grace. 
 GRACE GIRDtER, THE, 7 WaU. 801. 
 
 ford Bridge Co. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 19, Gill v. Wells. 
 a 23 Wall. 367, Reedy v. Scott. 
 a 94 U. S. 202, Dnnbar v. Myers. 
 a 94 U. S. 297, Fuller v. Yentzer. 
 
 Collision ; steamers and sailing 
 vessels, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; to revise in col- 
 lision case, it must be clear the 
 lower court has committed error. 6 
 
 GRACIE V. PAXMER, 8 Wh. 605. 
 
 Shipping; lien on cargo for 
 freight, a 
 Master cannot destroy such lien . 6 
 Charter-parties ; affreightment, c 
 
 a 9 Wall. 639, City of Paris. 
 6 93 U. S. 339, The Juniata. 
 
 GRAHAM V. BATNE, 18 H. 60. 
 
 Sup. Ct. ; reversal; mistrial; ve- 
 nire de novo, a 
 
 Agreed statement of facts ; when 
 reviewable. 6 . 
 
 Bills of exceptions, c 
 
 a 17 H. 62, Raymond v. Tyson. 
 6 18 H. 187, Schooner Freeman v. 
 
 Buckingham. 
 a 19 H. 25, Thomas v. Osborn. 
 a 5 Wall. 561, The Bird of Paradise 
 c 11 Wall. 601, Reed v. U. S. 
 
 a 18 H. 135, Guild v. Frontin. 
 b 20 H. 434, Suydam jj.Williamson. 
 6 1 Wall. 102, Burra. Des Moines. 
 1 Wall. 602, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 6 9 Wall. 127, Norria v. Jaclffion. 
 6 9 Wall. 431, Flanders v. Tweed. 
 e 97 U. S. 320, Herbert v. Butler. 
 
 GRAHAM, CtARK v. See Clark v. Graham. 
 GRAHAM, COOKE v. See Cooke v. Graham. 
 GRAHAM, NATIONAL BANK v. See National Bank v. Graham 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 117 
 
 GRAHAM -v. NORTON, 16 'Wall. 487. 
 
 U. S. courts; mandamus, a | a 102 U. S. 1S5, Greene Co. u. Daniel 
 ORAHAM, STRABER v. See Strader v. Grraham. 
 ORAHAM V. U. S., 4 WaU. 260. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; de- 
 livery of possession, a 
 Surveys, b 
 
 GRAN PAKA, THE, 7 WTl. 471. 
 
 _ Prize made by vessels wliicli liad 
 violated the neutrality acts ; resto- 
 ration, a 
 
 GRAND CHUTE V. ■wrtfEGAR, 15 WaU. 355. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 539, U. S. v. Pico. 
 6 95 TJ. S. 35, Van Reynegan 
 Bolton. 
 
 a 10 Wh. 497, The Gran Para. 
 
 Municipal bonds ; conditions ; 
 bona-flde holders; recitals; estop- 
 pel, a 
 
 alQ Wall. 465, Kenicottu.Superv's. 
 a 21 Wall. 321, Chambers!;. Clews. 
 a93 U. S. 514, Randolph v. Post. 
 a 94 U. S. 2S5, Comm'rs v. Clark. 
 a 96 U. S. 314, San Antonio v. Ma- 
 heffy. 
 
 GRAND GULF K. K. & B. CO. v. MARSHAXL,, 18 H. 165. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error to 
 State court ; how the Federal ques- 
 tion must appear, a 
 
 GBANTTE STATE, THE, 3 Wall. 31 
 
 Collision ; damages, a 
 
 Lights. 6 
 
 Collision with ship at anchor, c 
 
 a 19 H. 259, Bell e. Hearne. 
 a 20 Wall. 633, MurdockcMemphis 
 a 21 Wall. 639, Moore v. Mississippi 
 
 a 8 Wall. 386, The Baltimore. 
 6 14 Wall. 119, The Bridgeport, 
 c 23 Wall. 14, The Clarita. 
 c 97 U. S. 315, The Virginia Ehr- 
 man. 
 
 GRANT v. NATXOK, 4 Cr. 224. 
 Contracts ; mutual assent, a 
 GRANT, RATLBOAD CO. v. See Bailroad Co. v. Grant. 
 GRANT V. RAYMOND, 6 P. 220. 
 
 Patents; public use. a 
 Patents construed in favor of 
 patentee, b 
 Certificates of division, c 
 Reissues, d 
 
 ( a 101 U. S. 51, National B'k v. Hill. 
 
 a 7 P. 292, Shaw v. Cooper, 
 a 1 H. 204, McClurgw. Kingsland. 
 6 6 H. 477, Hogg v. Emerson, 
 c 7 H. 190, U. S. V. Chicago. 
 6 15 H. 338, Winans v. Denmead. 
 6 17 H. 80, Battin v. Taggert. 
 d 2 Wall. 604, Bead v. Bowman. 
 
 GBAPESHOT, THE, 9 WalL 131. 
 
 Admiralty; liens upon foreign 
 vessels for repairs, a 
 
 The President; military com- 
 manders and governors ; powers of 
 when acting by the presumed au- 
 thorization of the executive. 6 
 
 Provisional courts in time of 
 war. c 
 
 a 9 Wall. 758, The Guy. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 201, Tlie Luln. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 212, The Kalorama. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 335, The Patapsco. 
 
 6 15 Wall. 384, Pennywit v. Eaton 
 
 a 17 Wall. 669, The Emily Souder. 
 
 c 19 Wall. 525, Burke v. Milten- 
 
 ber-ger. 
 a 20 Wall. 164, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 6 20 Wall. 394, New Orl. v S. S. Co. 
 6 21 Wall. 88, Hamilton v. Dillon, 
 c 22 Wall. 295, Bank v. Bank. 
 c 23 Wall. 469, Lewis v. Cocks. 
 
 GRATIOT, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Gratiot. 
 
118 
 
 MANUAL OF BUPEEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 GRATIOT V. U. S., 15 P. 36S. 
 
 U. S. departments ; powers as to 
 employment ; extra services, a 
 
 Suits against public officers; set- 
 offs, b 
 
 Treasury transcripts as evi- 
 dence, c 
 
 GRATIOT V. U. S., 4 H. SO. 
 
 U. S.; regulations of the navy, a \ 
 
 a 15 P. 443, Mims v. V. S. 
 
 a 8 H. 101, U. S; V. Bnclianan. 
 
 a 9 H. 489, U. S. v. Brown. 
 
 & 9 Wall. 765, Watkins v. U. S. 
 
 c 19 Wall. 213, U. S. v. Gausseii. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 564, Hall v. U. S. 
 
 6 98 U. S. 186, MoKnight v. U. S. 
 c 102 U. 8. 554, U. S. v. Pinson. 
 
 100 U. S. 22, expaHe Reed. 
 
 GRATZ, BARB v. See Barr v. Gratz. 
 GRATZ, BRASHIER v. See Brashier ■». Gratz. 
 GRATZ, PBEVOST v. See Preyost v. Gratz. 
 GRATZ, ■WAU>EN v. See Walden v. Gratz. 
 GRAVES V. BOSTON MAR. INS. CO., 2 Cr. 444. 
 
 Equity; no jurisdiction where 
 remedy at law is complete; court 
 can notice objection of want of in- 
 nsd'vitiowsua sponie. a 
 
 Mistakes; parol evidence, b 
 
 a 19 H. 27S, Hipp v. Babin. 
 a 2 Bl. 551, Parker v. Cotton Co. 
 a 13 Bl. 621, In?. Co. v. Baiiey. 
 a 15 Bl. 228. Oelriclis v. Spain. 
 6 98 U. S. 89, Snell ji. Ins. Co. 
 
 GRAVES, SHEPPARD v. See Sheppard v. Graves. 
 GRAY V. BIANCHARD, 9'? U. S. 564. 
 
 Supreme Court; value of matter I a 100 U. S. 6, Tintsman v. Bank 
 in dispute, a I a 102 U. S. 121, Bank. Co. wins. Co 
 
 GRAY, BRIGNARDEIXO v. See Brignardello v. Gray. 
 GRAY, BURGESS v. See Burgess v. Gray. 
 GRAY, DAVIES V. See Davies v. Gray. 
 GRAY, SPRING V. See Spring v. Gray. 
 GRAY EAGIJE:, THE, 9 Wall. 505. 
 
 Collision ; rules of navigation ; I a 13 Wall. 479, The Ariadne. 
 I'Sn'^s- <^ I « 14 Wall. 359, The Continental. 
 
 GRAY JACKET, THE, 5 WaU. 370. 
 
 .J^'t: ^""^ ?," ^^^^}^ °* 5 '^""^® °* I « 7 Wall. 458, Confiscation Cases, 
 the Attorney-General, u, | 
 
 GRAYSON V. VIRGINIA, 3 Dall. 380. 
 
 Suits between States ; process, a 
 
 GREELEY V. BURGESS, 18 H. 417. 
 
 Duties; suit against collector; 
 i-ecovery back of duties ; protest, a 
 
 GREELEY V. THOMPSON, 10 H. 834. 
 
 Duties; time for fixing value of 
 goods ; treasury regulations, a 
 Recovery back of duties, b 
 Appraisement ; parol evidence, c 
 
 a 3 P. 461, New Jereey v. N. Y. 
 a 5 P. 284, Same v. Same. 
 a 17 H. 490, Florida v. Georgia. 
 a 24 H. 95, Kentucky h. Denulson. 
 
 a Bl. 480, Curtis v. Fiedler. 
 
 GREELEY, TOWNSEND v. See Townsend ,,. Greeley 
 GREEN, BANK U. S. v. See Bank U. S. ^. Green. 
 
 a 10 I-I. 254, Maxwell v. Griswold. 
 18 H. 414, Greeley v. Burgess. 
 a 20 H. 578. Sampson v. Peaslee. 
 c 24 H. 525, Belcher v. Linn. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 119 
 
 GEEEN V. BEDDLE, 8 Wh. 1. 
 
 Impiovements by bona-tide piu- 
 cliaser ; equity for repayment, a 
 
 Kentucky and Virginia ; act in 
 violation o£ compact of separation 
 void. 6 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; remedy, c. 
 
 Equity; rents and profits; to 
 wliat time account will be car- 
 ried, d 
 
 Autliority to declare State law 
 violating contract void, e 
 
 Recoupment, f 
 
 GREEN V. CUSTAKD, 83 H. 484. 
 
 U.S. courts ; State codes ; law and 
 equity must be kept distinct, a 
 
 GREEN V. CKEIGHTON, 83 H. 90. 
 
 U. S. courts; equity jurisdiction 
 cannot be afifected by State legisla- 
 tion, a 
 
 Claims against administrators. 6 
 
 GREEN, JONES v. See Jones v. Green, 
 GREEN V. LITER, 8 Cr. 848. 
 
 Land titles ; seizin in deed ; writs 
 of right; when tenant may dis- 
 prove demandant's seizin, a 
 
 Constructive possession, b 
 
 Title by grant, c 
 
 Sup.Ct.; " the value of the matter 
 in dispute." d 
 
 Patent; when court of equity- 
 will go behind and adjust equi- 
 ties, e 
 
 "Suit;" what is the meaning 
 of. / 
 
 Adverse possession, g 
 
 Patents; validity of. h 
 
 GREEN, XITER v. See Liter v. Green. 
 GEEEN V. NEAIi, 6 P. 891. 
 
 U.S. courts; obligatory force of 
 State decisions, a 
 
 a 4 P. 80, Carver u. Jackson. 
 6 P. 463, Hawkins v. Barney. 
 a 12 P. 60, McKinley v. Carroll, 
 c 1 H. 311, Bronson u. Kiiizlo. 
 c 6 H. 318, Plant. Bank v. Sharp. 
 d 12 H. 14"), Kiissell v. Southard. 
 e 13 H. 5.57, Penn. v. Bridge Co. 
 c 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas. 
 6 18 H. 420, Penn. o. Bridge Co. 
 a 20 11. 535, Williams v. Gibbes. 
 / 23 H. 235, Dermott v. Jones, 
 c 4 Wall. 550, Van Hoffman v. 
 
 Quincy. 
 d 17 Wall. 293, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 c 96 U. S. 604, Edwardsu.Kearsey 
 
 a 1 Bl. 314, Farni v. Tcsson. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 430, Payne v. Hook. 
 6 9 Wall. 755, Walker v. Walker. 
 
 a 7 Wh. 28, Green v. Watkins. 
 6 2 P. 201, Hunt v. Wiclvliffi;. 
 a 3 P. 112, luglls V. Snug Harbor. 
 6 5 P. 343, Clark v. Courtney. 
 6 5 P. 486, Peyton v. Stith. 
 6 6 P. 691, U. S. V. Arrcdondo. 
 a 10 P. 199, Boon v. Chiles. 
 a 12 P. 427, Strotlier v. Lucas. 
 6 3 H. 087, Clymer v. Dawkins. 
 c 9 H. 443, Doc v. Eslava. 
 dlo H.207, Kanouse v. Martin. 
 e 13 Wall. 86, Johnson v. Towsley 
 /91 U. S. 375, Kohl v.V. S. 
 q 99 U. S. 107, Harris «.McGovern 
 'h 102 U. S. 399, U. S. v. Sohurz. 
 
 a 16 
 
 a 2 
 
 a 7 
 
 a 11 
 
 a 14 
 
 a 2 
 
 a 18 
 
 a 97 
 
 U 
 U 
 
 alOOU 
 
 a 98 
 a 98 
 
 P. 486, Harpending U.Dutch 
 
 Church. 
 H. 106, Porterfleld v. Clark. 
 H. 215, Smith v. Kirnochen. 
 H. 317, Van Rensselaer v. 
 
 Kearney. 
 H. 496, Wl'bster v. CooJDer. 
 Bl. 003, Lefliiigvvellu. Warren 
 Wall. 82, Supervisors u.U.S. 
 U. S. 0S7, Davie «. Brlggs. 
 S. 235, Andraeu.Ri'dticld 
 S. 471, Amy «;. Dubuque. 
 S. 52, Fairfleld v. Galla- 
 tin. 
 
120 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPEEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 GBEEN, POWELL v. See Powell v. Green. 
 GKEEN, RTJTHEBFOBD v. See Eutherford v. Green. 
 GREEN, SECBIST v. See Secrist v. Green. 
 GREEN V. TJ. S., 9 Wall. 658. 
 
 Official bonds; sureties ; signing | a 16 Wall. 3, Dair v. U. S. 
 
 on conditions, a i 
 
 GREEN V. VAN BUSKIRK, 3 WaU. 450. 
 
 Supreme Conrt ; supersedeas, a 
 
 Direction of writ of error; " high- 
 est court of the State." 6 
 GREEN V. VAN BUSKIRK, 6 Wall. 
 
 Constitution ; faith and credit to 
 l)e jriven to judgments, a 
 
 Situs of personal property; when 
 it follovvs tlie domicil of owner, b 
 
 Liability to sale ; by what law 
 determined, c 
 
 GREEN T. WAXKESrS, 6 Wh. 860. 
 
 Real actions; abatement, a 
 Tenant ; may ofl'er in evidence 
 title of a tliird person. 6 
 
 GREEN, WITHERS v. See Withers v. Green. 
 
 GREEN BAT CO., PUMPEI.I.Y v. See Pumpelly v. Green Bay Oo, 
 
 GREENE, MOORE v. See Moore v. Green. 
 
 GBEENDEAF, BATIET v. See Bayley v. Greenleaf. 
 
 GBEENLEAP v. BIRTH, 5 P. 138. 
 
 Ejectment; setting up title in 
 tliird person by a mere intruder, a 
 
 Juiy; province of as to suffi- 
 ciency of evidence, b 
 
 Grants; construction, c 
 
 Error ; immaterial assignment 
 
 a 10 Wall. 291, Slaughter-House 
 
 I* SI Q^Q 
 
 & 91 U. S. 148, Atherton v. Fowler 
 
 310. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 145, Green v. Van Biis- 
 
 kirlv. 
 a 16 Wall. 621, Crapo v. Kelly. 
 6 92 U. S. 607, R. K. Tax Cases, 
 c 9:i U. S. 671, Hervey v. Works, 
 c 95 U. S. 250, Fosdick v. Schall. 
 
 a 7 Wh. 530, Macker v. Thomas. 
 6 3 P. 112, Inglis v. Snug Harbor, 
 
 a 9 P. 292, Greenleaf v. Birth. 
 6 10 P. 93, 'lYaey v. Swartout. 
 c 12 P. 741, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 6 3H. 71, Walker I!. Bank. 
 d 13 H. 330, R. R. Co. v. Howard. 
 6 IBl. 49, Weightman v. Wash- 
 ington. 
 d 10 Wall. 528, Brobst v. Brock. 
 
 GREENXEAP v. COOK, 8 Wh. 13. 
 
 Sale ; vendee in possession can- 
 not dispute payment of purchase- 
 money by alleged defect of title, a 
 
 GREENWOOD, HOTCHKISS v. 
 GREER V. MEZES, 84 H. 873. 
 
 U. S. courts; ejectment, a | a 1 Bl. 344, Singleton v. Touchard. 
 GREGG, DRAKEIiY v. See Drakely v. Gregg. 
 GREGG V. FORSYTH, 24 H. 179. 
 
 a 17 H. 584, Wanzer v. Truly. 
 
 See Hotchkiss v. Greenwood. 
 
 Illinois land titles; Pcoi'ia lots, a 
 
 Jurisdiction ; only parties to the 
 
 suit can object to irregularities. & 
 
 GREGG V. SAYBE, 8 P. 844. 
 
 Deeds; fraudulently obtained, a 
 
 GEEGG V. SAYBE, 8 P. 853. 
 
 Fiaudulent convej-ances; inno- 
 pnrohasers ; " color of title ; " lim- 
 itations, a 
 
 a 1 Bl. 152, Gregg ». Tesson. 
 a 2 Bl. 568, Dredge v. Forsyth. 
 6 3 Wall. 751, Secrist v. Green. 
 
 a 19 H. 324, Field v. Seabuiy. 
 
 a 18 H. 52, Wright v. Mattison. 
 a 19 H. 324, Field v. Seabury. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 121 
 
 GKEGG T. TESSON, 1 Bl. 150. 
 
 Illinois land titles ; Peoria lots ; I 2 Bl. 568, Dredge v. Forsyth, 
 limitations, a \ 
 
 GBEGOIBE, FASTNTNG v. See Fanning v. Gregoire. 
 GREGORY -V. McVeigh, 83 'Wall. 894. 
 
 Writs of error to State courts ; I a 93 U. S. 274, Windsor v McVeigh 
 "highest court of the iState." a | 
 
 GRIFFEY, CONRAD v. See Conrad v. Griffey. 
 GRIFFIN V. THOMPSON, 8 H. 844. 
 
 Executions ; duty of marshal in | a 2 H. 261, Buchanan v. Tianin. 
 receiving- payment, a - -- . . ^ . 
 
 1 a 3 II. 719, McFarland v. Gwin. 
 
 GRIFFITH V. BOGEBT, 18 H. 
 
 Time ; terminus a quo. a 
 
 168. 
 
 GRIFFITH, COMMONTYEAXTH BANK T. 
 GRIFFITH V. FRAZIER, 8 Cr. 84. 
 
 a 22 H. 435, Thompson v. Carroll. 
 a 94 U. S. 560, Dutcher v. Wright. 
 
 See Comm. Bank v. Grifflth. 
 
 Executors ; legal title to per- 
 sonal property, a 
 Liability for each other, b 
 
 GRIGNON -V. ASTOR, 8 H. 319. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 
 Land titles ; confirmation by act 
 of Congress. 6 
 
 a 14 P. 38, Kane v. Paul. 
 
 6 14 P. 166, Edmonds v. Crenshaw 
 
 GBOIA, MAGEE v. 
 
 GRISAR V. McDOWEIit, 6 'Wall. 31 
 
 California; Mexican titles; ap- 
 peals from Board of Commissioners 
 under act of 1851. a 
 
 Public lands. 6 
 
 a 7 H. 178, Erwiii v. Lovvry. 
 
 a 8 H. 409, West v. Smith. 
 
 6 9 I-I. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 a 12 H. 378, Sargeant v. Bank. 
 
 a 18 H. IGl, Gi'ifflth v. Bogert. 
 
 a 18 H. 497, Beauregard v. "New 
 Orleans. 
 
 a 22 H. 11, Parker v. Kane. 
 
 a 24 H. 203, Nations v. Johnson. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 634, Gray v. Brignar- 
 dello. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 216, Florintine v. Bar- 
 ton. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 342, Harvey v. Tyler. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 406, Comstock v Craw- 
 ford. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 316, Cooper ^Reynolds 
 
 a 11 Wall. .300, Miller v. U. S. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 366, McNitt v. Turner. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 165, Tilton a. Cofield. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 421, Mohr v. Manierre. 
 See Mager v. Grima. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 19, Keese v. U. S. 
 b 9 Wall. 324, Lynch v. Bernal. 
 6 98 U. S. 16, Palmer v. Low. 
 b 100 U. S. 139, Brownsville v. 
 
 Cavazos. 
 6 100 U. S. 251, Trenouth v. San 
 
 Francisco. 
 
 GRISWOIiD, HEPBURN v. See Hepburn v. Griswold. 
 GKISWOIiD, BOI.EY v. See Boley v. Griswold. 
 GBISWOI.D, MAXWELIi v. See Maxwell v. Griswold. 
 
122 
 
 MANUAL 01' SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 GBOSSMAYEB, U. S. v. See U. S. v., Grossmayer, 
 GBOVB T. BBIEN, 8 H. 439. 
 
 Bills of lading; consignments; 
 cfllect. of.' a 
 
 Sales; when title to personal 
 property vests, b 
 
 GBOVES V. StAUGHTEB, 15 P. 496 
 
 Decisions of State courts; when 
 binding on Federal courts; validity 
 of notes given for purchase of 
 
 a 17 H. 105, Lawrence v. Minturn. 
 a 3 Wail. 553, The Bermuda. 
 6 11 Wall. 5G4, Hoi lidavu Hamilton 
 a 14 Wall. 266, Vanghan u.The Tel- 
 egraph. 
 
 a 5 H. 131, Rowan v. Runnels. 
 
 a 5 H. 141, Truly v. Wanzer. 
 
 a 6 H. ■ 5, Sims v. Hundley, 
 slaves, a' 6 7 U. 392, Passenger Gas. (Opin. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- of Moliean. J.) 
 
 merce. 6 a 7 H. 817, Nesmith v. Sheldon. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 657, Osborn «. Nicholson 
 
 a 100 U. S. 52, Fairfield v. Gallatin 
 
 GBUNDY & THOENBUBGH, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Grundy & Thombargh. 
 GBUNBT, irOIING v. See Young v. Grundy. 
 GBUNDY, BOYCE v. Sea Boyoe v. Grundy. 
 GBUNEB V. U. S., 11 H. 163. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter 
 in dispute, a 
 Jurisdiction. 6 
 
 GBYMBS, DOE v. See Elmore v. Grymes. 
 GBYMES, EtMOBE v. See Elmore v. Grymes. 
 GUABANTY CO., JONES v. See Jones v. Guaranty Co. 
 GUE V. TIDE WATEB CANAX CO., 84 H. 868. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty. 
 6 20 Wall. 7, Habich o. Polger. 
 
 U. S. courts ; ancillary suits, a 
 
 Railroads; sale under decree; 
 title of purchaser. & 
 
 Equity ; will protect fund for all 
 the stockholders, c 
 GUESTIEB, HUDSON v. See Hudson v. Guestier. 
 GUILBEAU, YOUNGE v. See Younge v. Guilbeau 
 GUILD V. ITBONTIN, 18 H. 135. 
 
 Supreme Court; review of judg- 
 ment in case where by agreement 
 the court below decided the facts 
 and the law. a 
 
 Judgment in such a case will be 
 affirmed. 6 
 
 Waiver of jury, c 
 
 GUITABD V. STODDARD, 16 H. 494, 
 
 a 24 H. 460, Freeman v. Howe. 
 6 6 Wall. 752, James v. R. R. Co. 
 c 21 Wall. 623, Jackson v. Ludeling 
 
 a 21 H. 86, Kelsey v. Forsyth. 
 a 21 H. 226, Campbell v. Bovreau. 
 b 1 Wall. 604, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 a 9 Wall. 429, Flanders v. Tweed, 
 c 12 Wall. 281, Kearney b. Case, 
 c 91 U. S. 614, Gilman v. Tel. Co. 
 
 Missouri land titles; act June 13, 
 1812 ; out-lots in St. Louis, a 
 
 a 18 H. 136, Savignac v. Garrison. 
 a 1 Bl. 601, Glasgow v. Hortiz. 
 
 GUNN V. BABBY, 15 Wall. 688. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- I a 96 U. S. 604, Edwards v. Keivrzey 
 tracts ; exemptions ; execution, a \ 
 
 GUNNEII, V. BIBD, 10 Wall. 307. 
 
 Equity ; bills of revivor, a 
 GUTHEIE, GOODBICH V. See Goodrich v. GutUrie. 
 GUXHBIE, SIMMS v. See Slmms v. Guthrie. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 204, Fretz v. Stover. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 123 
 
 GUTTSCHALCK, BAIflK METBOPOMS v. See Bank Met. v. Giittsclialclc. 
 GUY, THE, 9 Wall. 758. 
 
 Admiialty ; lien oa foreign ves- I a 10 Wall. 214, The Kalorama. 
 sels for repairs, a. \ 
 
 GUT V. BAXTIMOKE, 100 U. S. 434. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 raerce ; discrimination against pro- 
 ducts of ottier States, a 
 GUT, SHELBT V. See Shelby v. Guy. 
 GWIN V. BBEEDLOTE, 15 P. 884. 
 
 Supreme Court ; motion to dis- 
 miss for failure to return record, 
 and motion to docket, a 
 
 GWIN T. BREEDiOTE, S H. 89. 
 
 U. S. courts; process acts; how 
 far they adopt State practice, a 
 Auxiliary suits. 6 
 
 HABICH V. rOLGEK, 80 Wall. 6. 
 
 Jurisdiction; appearance, a 
 
 Judgments; effect and credit un- 
 der the Constitution ; act of 1790. b 
 HACKETT, MEKCEK CO. v. See Mercer Co. v. Hackett. 
 HABDEN V. COIJjECTOR, 5 Wall. 118. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 679, Machine Co. v. Gage 
 
 a 3 Wall. 103, Sparrow v. Strong. 
 
 a 6 H. 9, Gwin v. Barton. 
 
 b 16 Wall. 195, Bank v. Turnball. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 13, Creighton v. Kerr. 
 & 97 U. S. 336, Ins. Co. v. Harris. 
 
 Duties on goods imported east of 
 Cape of Good Hope, a 
 Statutes; con.struction ; title. 6 
 
 HAGAN V. LUCAS, 10 P. 400. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction ; State 
 and Federal courts, a 
 
 a 12 Wall. 29, Sturges v. CoU'r. 
 & 91 U. S. 83, U.S.M.U.P.B.R. 
 a 101 U. S. 790, Powers v. Comly. 
 
 HAGAN, POLI-AlKD v, 
 HAGAN T. WALKER, 14 H 
 
 U. S. courts; equity; parties, a 
 
 a 4H. 12, Brown ». Clark. 
 a 17 H. 474, PuUiam v. Osborne. 
 a 20 H. 591, Tavlor v. Carrvl. 
 a 3 Wall. 340, Buck v. Colbath. 
 a 6 Wall. 197, Kiggs v. Johnson. 
 a 13 Wall. 716, Watson v. Jones. 
 a 16 Wall. 371, Taylor v. Taintor. 
 a 19 Wall. 223, Ins. Co. v. Dunn. 
 a 20 Wall. 392, jSTewOrl.jj.S.S.Co. 
 a 22 Wall. 253, French v. Hay. 
 See Pollard v. Hagan. 
 36. 
 
 a 17 H. 137, Shields v. Barrow. 
 6 23 H. 106, Green v. Creighton. 
 a 93 U. S. 204, Ober v. Gallagher, 
 c 94 U. S. 736, Jerome v. McCarter. 
 
 Administration; suit in, equity 
 without taking account of testator's 
 debts. 6 
 
 Foreclosure; parties, c 
 
 HAIGHT V. KAH-KOAD CO., 6 Wall. 17. 
 
 Income tax ; tax on interest paid I a 17 Wall. 324, U. S. v. R. E. Co. 
 by corporations, a I 
 
 HAILE, MASON v. See Mason d. Haile. 
 HAILBS V. VAlN WOBMEK, 80 Wall. 363. 
 
 Patent law; "inventions." a | a92U.S. 353,EeckendorferuFaber 
 HALE, BALDWIN v. See Baldwin v. Hale. 
 HALE, BEALS v. See Beals v. Hale. 
 
124 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 114, liong v. Converse. 
 6 92 U. S. 713, Hot Springs Cases. 
 
 HAI/E V. GAINES, 88 H. 149. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State courts ; Federal qijestion. a 
 
 Missouri land titles ; New Madrid 
 locations; surveys. 6 
 
 HAXIi V. AXLEN, 18 WaU. 458. 
 
 Bankruptcy; no appeal to Su- a 15 Wall. 638, Mead W.Thompson, 
 preme Court from the Circuit Court a 19 Wall. 286, Coit u. Robinson, 
 exercising supervisory jurisdic- a 23 Wall. 160, Stickney ». Wilt. 
 tion. a a 23 Wall. 29.?, Sandusky v. Bank. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 348, Wiswall v. Camp- 
 bell. 
 HAII/, eOPPBIil. T. See Coppell v. Hall. 
 HAIil., BMEKSON v. See Emerson «. Hall. 
 HAXl, MOKSEIili V. See Morsell ii. Hall. 
 HAtli V. BUSSBILX, 101 U. S. 503. 
 
 Pre-emption ; rights of wife of I a 101 U. S. 520, Vance v. Burbank, 
 settler; donations, a | 
 
 HAI.I., WAGER V. See Wager v. Hall. 
 
 HAM. & WORTH, V. S. v. See U. S. v. Hall & Wortli. 
 
 HAXI.ECK, r. S. T. See U. S. ■». Halleok. 
 
 HAXtETT V. BEEBE, 13 H. 85. . ■ 
 
 States ; right over soil below high | a 23 Wall. 68, St. Clair ». Loving- 
 water mark, a \ ston. 
 
 HAJLLETT, MOBII.E V. See MobUe v. Hallett. 
 
 HAXIEBURTON v. V. S., 13 WaU. 63. 
 
 U. S.; suits against publicofflcers; I a 101 U. S. 549, E. R. Co. v. U. S. 
 credits, a \ 
 
 HAXtlDAT T. HAMILTON, 11 Wall. 564. 
 
 Bills of lading, a | o 93 U. S. 582, The Idaho. 
 
 HAIiSTEAB, BANK OF THE r. S. v. See Bank of the U. S. o. Halstead. 
 HAMILTON, EX PARTE. See U. S. v. Hamilton. 
 HAMILTON V. DILION, 81 WaU. 73. 
 
 Internal revenue ; duties of Com- I a 100 U. S. 12, Soule v. U. S. 
 missioner. a \ 
 
 HAMILTON, HALLIDAT v. See Halliday v. Hamilton. 
 HAMILTON V. MOORE, 3 DaU. 371. 
 
 Supreme Court ; docketing ap- I a 99 U. S. 506, Grigsby v. Pnroell. 
 peals and writs of error, a \ 
 
 HAMILTON V. BXJSSELL, 1 Cr. 310. 
 
 Fraud on creditors ; sale without 
 possession, a 
 
 a 3 Cr. 88, U. S. v. Hooe. 
 
 a 11 Wh. 78, Brooks v. Marbury. 
 
 a 20 H. 456, Warner v. Norton. 
 
 HAMILTON, SOMERVrLlE v. See Somerville v. Hamilton. 
 HAMILTON, SPAIN v. See Spain v. Hamilton. 
 HAMILTON, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Hamilton. ' 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 125 
 
 HAMILTON CO. V. MASSACHUSETTS, 6 WaU 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of errox- to 
 State courts; Feileral question, a 
 
 Constitution ; taxing power of 
 tlie States. 6 
 
 Taxation of corporations, c 
 
 636. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 21i Steines v. Franklin. 
 a 14 Wall. 237, Caperton v. Bowyer 
 b 20 Wall. 62, R. R. v. Maguire. 
 c 95 U. S. 687, Farringtonu.Tenn. 
 
 HAMPTON, THE, 5 WaU. 373. 
 
 Prize ; capture overrides, a 
 
 a 6 Wall. 498, The Battle. 
 
 HAMPTON V. MoCONNEIX, 3 'WTi. 334. 
 
 Constitution ; credit to be given 
 judgments of State courts ; jurisdic- 
 tion, a 
 
 HAMPTON V. ROUSE, 13 Wall. 187. 
 
 a 13 P. .324, McElmoyle v. Cohen. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 302, Christmas w Russell 
 
 a 18 Wall. 463, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 428, Michaels v. Post. 
 
 a 91 IT. S. 661, Lamp Co. v. Brass 
 Co. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals ; joint 1 a 20 Wall. 157, Simpson v. Greeley, 
 decrees, a I 
 
 HAMPTON V. KOUSE, 15 -WaU. 686. 
 
 Writs of error ; Supreme Court ; | as 91 U. 
 amendment, a \ 
 
 HANAUER V. DOANE, 13 WaU. 345. 
 
 Contracts in aid of the rebellion ; 
 void, a 
 
 S. 24, Semmes v. U. S. 
 
 a97U. 
 HANAUER V. WOODRUFF, 10 W^aU. 483 
 
 a 12 Wall. 357, Thomas v. Rich- 
 mond. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 444, HanaueruWoodruflf 
 
 a 16 Wall. 150, Carlisle M. U. S. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 463, Sprott v. U. S. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 170, Whitfield v. U. S. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 195, Dewing v. Perdica- 
 ries. 
 464, Keith v. Clark. 
 
 Contracts; Confederate money 
 good consideration, a 
 
 Contracts in aid of the rebellion ; 
 void. 6 
 
 HANAUER v. W^OODRUIT, 15 WaU, 
 
 War ; contracts in aid of the re- 
 bellion, a 
 
 a 14 Wall. 665, Delmas v. Ins. Co. 
 6 20 Wall. 465, Sprott v. U. S. 
 6 96 U. S. 195, Dewing v. Perdica- 
 ries. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 556, Confed. Note Case. 
 a 91 U. S. 4, Wil. R. R. v. King. 
 a 96 U. S. 195, Dewing v. Perdica- 
 ries. 
 
 HANDT, HARDING v. See Harding v. Handy. 
 HANDSET V. ANTHONY, 6 Wh. 384 
 
 Customs ; understanding of the 
 vicinage may fix construction of 
 right, a 
 
 Boundaries; rivers, b. 
 
 a 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 b 13 H. 397, Howard v. Ingcrsoll. 
 6 23 H. 514, Alabama v. Georgia. 
 6 23 Wall. 63, St. Clair v. Loving- 
 stou. 
 
 HANDLIN T. WICmLUETE, 13 WaU. 173. 
 
 Military; powers of. a \a 15 Wall. 384, Penny wit «. Eaton. 
 
126 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 HANES, lANGDEAC v. See Langdeau v. Hanes. 
 HAJVEY V. BAIT. S. PACKET CO., 83 H. 893 
 
 Collision ; lookouts, a 
 
 HANGEK V. ABBOTT, 6 Wall. 538. 
 
 Statutes of limitation ; suspension 
 
 a 3 Wall. 273, The Ottowa. 
 
 dui'ina" tlic civil war. a 
 
 a 9 Wall. 689, The Protector. 
 a 10 Wall. 222, Brann v. Saiirvvein. 
 a n Wall. 254, Levy v. Stewart. 
 a 11 Wall. 50.S, Stewart i>. Kahii. 
 a 11 Wall. 513, U. S. v. Wiley. 
 a 14 Wall. 235, Caperton u. Bowyer 
 a 15 Wall. 560, Adger v. Alston. 
 a 18 Wall. 110, University «. Finch. 
 a 22 Wall. 586, Eoss «. Jones. 
 a 92 U. S. 115, Harrison v. Myer. 
 
 HANTflBAX K. K. v. SWIFT, 18 WaU. 878. 
 
 Railroads ; common carriers ; lia- i a 100 U. S. 29, E. E. Co. v. Fraloff. 
 bility for loss of baggage, a \ 
 
 HANNING, BAELBOAD CO. v. See Eailroad Co. v. Hanning. 
 
 HANNIW^INKXB v. GEORGETOWN, 15 Wall. 648. 
 
 Equity ; enjoining collection of I a 92 U. S. 613, State Eailroad Tax 
 taxeii. a I Case. 
 
 HANEICK V. BARTON, 16 Wall. 166. 
 
 Texas titles ; extension of title ; I a 102 U. S. 360, Hunnicutt v. Pey- 
 assignment; inchoate rights, a \ ton. 
 
 HANSON, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Hanson. 
 
 HAPPEKSETT, MINOR V. See Minor v. Happersett. 
 
 HARBOR COMMISSIONERS, W^EBER v. See Weber v. Harbor Com'rs. 
 
 HAECOURT V. GAXtARD, 18 WTi. 588. 
 
 a 6 P. 706, U. S. v. Arredondo. 
 6 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas, 
 c 12 P. 714, Ehode Island u. Mass. 
 
 Land laws; British and Spanish 
 grants ; act of March 3, 1803. a 
 
 Eft'eot of acquisition of territory 
 on property. 6 
 
 Boundaries of the U. S. are the 
 States ; U. S. acquired no territory 
 by treaty 1783. c 
 
 HARDEMAN V. ANDERSON, 4 H. 640. 
 
 Supersedeas, a a 11 H. 295. Hogan «. Eoss. 
 
 a 16 H. 146, Adams m. Law. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 189, exparteB.. E. Co. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 292, Slanghter-Honse 
 Cases. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 100, French c. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 
 HARDEMAN v. HARRIS, 7 H. 787. 
 
 Equity ; admissions ; answers, a | a 7 Wall. 212, Brown v. Pierce. 
 HARDEMAN, HARRIS v. See Harris v. Hardeman. 
 HARDEN V. FISHER, 1 Wh. 300. 
 
 Treaty with Great Britain, 1794; I a9 Wh. 489, Hughes v. Edwards, 
 alienage, a \ 
 
 HARDENBERG, TEXAS v. See Texas v. Hardenberg. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 127 
 
 10 p. 200. Boon v. Chiles. 
 2 H. 416, Kaiulel v. Brown. 
 
 5 H. 149, Veazie v. Williams. 
 17 H. 137, Shields v. Bairow. 
 
 6 Wali. 285, Barney v. Balt'ie. 
 92 U. S. 695, Gai-feil v. Beall. 
 94 U. S. 511, Allore v. Jewel. 
 
 g 100 U. S. 528, Mount Pleasant v. 
 Beck with. 
 
 HARKNESS v. HYDE, 98 U. S. 476. 
 
 Jui-isdiction of Congress over pub- I a 102 U. S. 146, Langford v. Mon- 
 lic lands, a | teith. 
 
 HAKMEK, MORRIS v. See Morris v. Harmer. 
 HARMON, JOHNSON v. See Jolmson v. Harmon. 
 HARMONT, BHTCHEL,!. v. See Mitchell d. Harmony. 
 HARPENDING v. DUTCH CHURCH, 16 P. 439. 
 
 HARDING V. HANDY, 11 Wh. 103. 
 
 
 Equity ; allegata and probata 
 
 a 
 
 must agree, a 
 
 b 
 
 Liens on chattels. 6 
 
 c 
 
 Kesoission of contracts, c 
 
 d 
 
 Parties ; when proper, but not 
 
 d 
 
 necessary, d 
 
 e 
 
 Issues at law. e 
 
 f 
 
 Undue influence. / 
 
 g 
 
 Masters' reports, g 
 
 
 U. S. courts; obligatory force of 
 State decisions, a 
 
 a 2 H. 106, Porterfield v. Clark. 
 a 20 Wall. 143, K. B. v. E. R. 
 a 97 U. S. 637, Davie u. Briggs. 
 a 98 TJ. S. 235, Andrse v. RedfieUl. 
 a 98 U. S. 471, Amy v. Dubuque. 
 
 HARRIMAN, THE, 9 WaU. 161. 
 
 Contracts; impossible perform- | a 13 Wall. 22, Boyden v. U. S. 
 ance ; when excuse, a I 
 
 HARRIMAN, SCHIILENBERG v. See Schnlenberg v. Harriman. 
 BLARRIS V. DENNIE, 3 P. 399. 
 
 U. S.; lien for duties ; construc- 
 
 tion of sec. 62, act March 2, 1799. a 
 Writs of error to State court; 
 Federal question. 6 
 
 Creditor cannot by attachment 
 take goods on importation out of 
 custody of U. S.; conflict of juris- 
 diction, c 
 
 a 4 P. 147, Harris v. D'Wolf. 
 6 4 P. 410, Craig u., Missouri. 
 6 5 P. 248, Fisher v. Cookrell. 
 6 6 P. 41, Davis v. Packard, 
 c 6 P. 279, Conard v. Ins. Co'. 
 6 10 P. 368, Crowell v. Randell. 
 6 12 H. 120, Williams v. Oliver, 
 c 20 H. 596, Taylor v. Cariyl. 
 
 HARRIS, HARDEMAN' v. See Hardeman v. Harris. 
 HARRIS V. HARDEMAN, 14 H. 339. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; notice, a 
 When judgments cannot be at- 
 tacked collaterally, b 
 
 due 
 
 HARRIS, RAXLROAD CO. v, 
 HARRIS V. ROBINSON, 4 H, 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice ; 
 diligence, a 
 
 Regularity a question for the 
 court. & 
 
 HARRIS V. BUNNEI/S, 18 H. 79. 
 
 >regotiable paper ; illegality, a I a 96 U, 
 Contracts ; void by statute. 6 | 6 98 U. 
 
 a 24 H. 205, Nations v. Johnson. 
 6 18 Wall. 466, Thompson w. Wliit- 
 
 man. 
 6 20 Wall. 7, Habicli v. Folger. 
 a 23 Wall. 136, Rayu Norse worthy 
 a 91 U. S. 510, Earle «. McVeigh. 
 a 95 U. S. 732, Peanoyer v. Neff. 
 
 See EaiJroad Co. ^. Harris. 
 345. 
 
 a 9 H. 557, Lambert v. Ghiselin. 
 6 18 H. 517, Watson ». Tarpley. 
 
 S. 641, Mining Co. v. Bank 
 S. 627, Bank u. Mathews. 
 
128 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 HAKRISON, TBGE, 1 Wh. 898., 
 
 Supreme Court; prize causes. a\ao Wall. 412, The Wm. Bagaley. 
 HARRISON, CROSS T. See Gross v. Harrison. 
 HARRISON, rOI-EY v. See Foley d. Harrison. 
 HARRISON T. MYERS, 98 U. S. 111. 
 
 Landlord and tenant; rent; dis- 
 possession by military authorities, a 
 
 HARRISON V. NIXON, 9 P. 483. 
 
 Error; what errors appellate 
 court will notice sua sponte; verdict 
 must conform to issue, a 
 
 Reversal ; generally can only be 
 obtained by appellant. 6 
 
 Proofs must correspond with al- 
 legations, c 
 
 Sup. Court ; reversal with leave 
 to make new proofs, d 
 
 Parties to suits ; how made, e 
 
 HARRISON v. STBRRT, 6 Cr. 898. 
 
 Conflict of laws ; bankrupt law of 
 foreign country incapable of opera- 
 ting on property in U. S. a 
 
 Law governing contracts. & 
 
 Bankruptcy of one partner; ef- 
 fect on firm property, c 
 
 Priority of the U. S. d 
 
 HARRISON V. VOSE, 9 H. 378. 
 
 Eevenue laws ; what is an impor- I 
 tation. a \ 
 
 HARSHMAN v. BATES CO., 98 U. S. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads; subscriptions; ef- 
 fect of consolidation, a 
 
 Election by "two-thirds of the 
 qualified voters " ; Missouri town- 
 ship aid act. b 
 
 \ a 101 U. S. 616, Gates v. Goodloe. 
 
 05 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 
 6 5 Wall. 412, The Wm. Bagalev. 
 c 9 Wall. 793, Rubber Co. v Good- 
 year. 
 
 d n Wall. 227, May ». Le Claire. 
 & 12 Wall. 135, Mail Co. » Flanders 
 a 12 Wall. 403, Barth v. Clisc. 
 e 94 U. S. 21, ex parte Cutting. 
 6 94 U. S. 599, The Stephen Mor- 
 gan. 
 
 a 12 Wh. 358, Ogden v. Saunders. 
 6 5 P. 523, Smith «. Union Bank. 
 a 17 H. 337, Booth ». Clark. 
 a 16 Wall. 627, Crapo v. Kelly, 
 e 22 Wall. 406, Amsinck v. Beau. 
 d 92 U. S. 622, Lewis d. U. S. 
 
 a 9 H. 629, Marriot v. Brune. 
 a 8 Wall. 120, Waring v. Mayor. 
 
 . 669. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 691, Scotland Co. », 
 Thomas. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 806, East Lincoln v. 
 Davenport. 
 
 6 95 U. S. 365, Cass v. Johnston. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 89, Bates v. Winters. 
 
 6 99 U. S. 50-1, Wilson v. Sala- 
 manca. 
 
 6 101 U. S. 687, Douglass v. Pike. 
 HART, ARTHUR v. See Arthur v. Hart. 
 HART, BACON v. See Bacon v. Hart. 
 
 HART, BAPTIST ASSOCIATION v. See Baptist Association v. Hart. 
 HARX, PERKINS v. See Perkins v. Hart. 
 HART,' V. S. T. See U. S. v. Hart. 
 HART, WHITE v. See White v. Hart. 
 
 HARTFORD BR. CO., EAST HART. v. See East Hart. v. Hart. Bridge Co. 
 HARTFORD INS. CO., RIDDI-ESBERGER v. See Eiddlesberger v. Ins. Co. 
 HARTFORD INS. CO., SCHACKER v. See Schijcker v. Hartford Ins. Co. 
 HARTFORD INS. CO., SEMMES V. See Semmes v. Hartford Ins. Co. 
 
MANUAL or SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 129 
 
 HABTSHORN v. DAY, 19 H. 811. 
 
 Patent law; licensees, a 
 Fmiid or mistake in execution of 
 
 (leeil ; when it may be sliovvu at 
 
 law. 6 
 
 a'20 H. 217, Dav o. Rubber Co. 
 
 6 10 Wall. 383, R. R.Co. v. Trimble 
 
 HAKTWEXIi, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Hartwell. 
 HAHVEY, BUFMNGTON v. See Bufflngton v Harvey. 
 HARVEY V. TYLER, 3 Wall. 338. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; void and voidable 
 judgments, a 
 
 Suitiites ; retrospective opera- 
 lion. 6 
 
 Chaige of the court ; exceptions 
 to. c 
 
 a 10 Wall. 316, Cooper c. Reynolds 
 6 17 Wall. 599, Sobn u. Watterson. 
 a 18 Wall. 371, Galpin v. Page. 
 6 20 Wall. 187, Twenty Per-ceufc 
 
 Cases, 
 c 93 U. S. 54, Beaver v. Taylor, 
 c 93 U. S. 295, R. R.Co. v. Horst. 
 
 HARVIB, THOMAS T. See Thomas v. Harvie. 
 HABWOOD V. BAXLBOAI) CO., 17 Wall. 80. 
 
 Equity; breacli of trust ; acqui- | a 17 Wall. 349, Hume ». Beale. 
 escence ; laches, a | a 96 U. S. 618. Haywood t>. Bank. 
 
 HASKEXIi, SEVrsB v. See Sevier v. Haskell. 
 HATCH, BAUK. tr. S. v. See Bank U. S. «. Hatch. 
 HAUGHTON, BEEBS v. See Beers u. Haughton. 
 HAVEMEYEB v. IOWA CITY, 3 W^all. 894. 
 
 Municipal and county aid to rail- 
 roads ; validity of bonds ; decisions 
 of the State courts ; when not fol- 
 lowed by U. S. courts, a 
 
 a 4 Wall, 275, Mitchell v. Burling- 
 ton. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 690, Olcott v. Supervis- 
 ors. 
 
 HAWES, I.ENDSET v. See Ijndsey v. Hawes. 
 HAWBJNS V. BABNBY, 5 P. 457. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; remedy, a 
 
 Statutes of limitation ; law of 
 forura. 6 
 
 a 6 H. 331, I'lant. Bank v. Sharp. 
 6 9 H. 413, Townsend u. Jemison. 
 a 95 U. S. 633, Terry u. Anderson. 
 6 98 U. S. 471, Amy u. Dubuque. 
 
 HAWKIKS, V. S. V. See U. S. ■«. Havrkins. 
 HAWXEY, MITCHEtt v. See Mitchell v. Hawley. 
 HAYBTTBN'S CASE, 8 Dall. 409. 
 
 Judicial power of the U. S. a | a 13 H. 49, U. S. v. Ferreira. 
 
 HAYCEAET v. U. S., 83 WaU. 81. 
 
 The civil war; cotton; capture, aia^'i U. S. 194, Lamar v. Brown. 
 
 U 97 U. S. 58, Young v. U. S. 
 
 HAYDEX, SUFEOI-K CO. v. See Suffolk Co. v. Hayden. 
 
 HAYS V. PAC. MAIt S. S. CO., 17 H. 599. 
 
 Constitution ; commerce ; taxa- 
 tion by States of ships; what is 
 property within the jinisdiction of 
 taxing power, a 
 
 a 11 Wall. 432, St. Louis v. Ferry 
 
 Co. 
 a 12 Wall. 213, St. Ton. Tax Cases. 
 a 16 Wall. 477, Morgan v. Parliani. 
 a 99 U. S. 282, Tr. Co. m. Wheeling 
 
 HAYWAED, McCBACKEN v. See McOraclcen v. Hayward. 
 HAYWOOD, SIGLEB v. See Sigler v. Haywood. 
 9 
 
130 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 HAZARD T. NEW ENG. MAK. INS. CO., 8 P. 578. 
 
 Insurance; what insurer bound I a S H. 245, Clark».Miinnf. Ins. Co. 
 to know, o I 
 
 HEAD V. PBOV. INS. CO., 
 
 Corporations; powers, a 
 
 8 Cr. 187 
 
 . 
 
 a 
 
 a 12 Wli 
 
 
 a 13 P. 
 
 
 a 6H. 
 
 
 a 9H. 
 
 
 a21H. 
 
 64, U. S. V. D!indnr]j;(!. 
 584, Banl; v. Earle. 
 318, Banks). Sliarp. 
 177, Perrine v. Canal Co. 
 442, Pearce v. K. K. Co. 
 
 HEASNi: V. MAK. INS. CO., 80 WaU. 490. 
 
 Equity ; jurisdiction to reform | a 98 U. S. 83, Ivinson v. Hutton. 
 contracts; fraud; parol evidence, a | a 98 U. S. 89, Snell v. Ins. Co. 
 
 HEATH, BEIN v. See Bein v. Heath. 
 
 HECKEB V. EOWXEJJ, 1 Bl. 95. 
 
 Supreme Court; will dismiss for I a 3 Wall. 105, Sparrow v. Strong, 
 want of jurisdiction, a \ 
 
 HEDKICK V. HUGHES, 15 Wall. 183. 
 
 California ; Mexican land titles ; I a 98 IT. S. 14, Palmer v. Low. 
 evidence of grant ; entries, a I 
 
 HEIDEI.BACH, AM. BBIDGE CO. v. See Am. Bridge Co. v. Heidelbaoh. 
 
 HEINE V. I.BVEB COMMISSIONERS, 19 'Wall. 660. 
 
 U. S. coiu-ts ; authority over State I a 92 U. S. 615, Railroad Tax Cases, 
 tax officers, a | 
 
 HELEN, THE, TJ. S. v. See U. S. v. The Helen. 
 
 HEI.I.MAN, MATER v. See Meyer v. Hellman. 
 
 HEMMENWAY v. FISHER, 30 H. 858. 
 
 Admiralty ; interest, a j a 2 Wall. 550, The Ann Caroline. 
 
 HENDEBSON V. ANBEBSON, 3 H. 73. 
 
 Negotiable paper; party to can- I a 1 Wall. 173, Sweeney v. Easter. 
 not discredit by his own testimony .a | 
 
 HENDEBSON v. MATfOR N. Y.. 98 IT 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com 
 merce ; police power, a 
 Imports; tax on. b 
 Exclusive powers of Congress. ( 
 
 HENDERSON V. MOORE, 5 Cr. 11. 
 
 Error ; refusing new trial, or to 
 continue a case, not assignable for 
 error, a 
 
 S. 865. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 276, Chy Lnng ». Free- 
 man. 
 a 94 U. S. 542, Doyle v. Ins. Co. 
 a 95 U. S. 470, Ea'ih'oad u. Husen. 
 a 97 U. S. 34, Beer Co. v. Mass. 
 a 97 U. S. 503, Patterson tJ.'Ky. 
 6 97U. S. 572, Cooku. Penn. 
 a 100 U. S. 679. Mach. Co. v. Gage, 
 c 102 U. S. 702,' Mobile v. Kimball. 
 
 Hollings- 
 
 1 P. 165, Wright v. 
 wortii. 
 
 5 H. 223, Jones v. Van Zant. 
 
 7H. 190, U. S. V. Chicago. 
 
 1 Wall. 598, Poraeroy v. Bank. 
 
 3 Wall. 105, Sparrow v. Stronir. 
 
 7 Wall. 502, Ewing v. Howard. 
 a 13 Wall. 604, Ins. Co. v. Barton. 
 a 93 U. S. 301, Ind. R. R. v. Horst. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 131 
 
 iajENDEKSON v. POINDEXTEB, 18 Wll. 530. 
 
 ' actual 
 
 Cession act of Georgia ; 
 settlers." a 
 
 Eflfect of cession on property 
 rights, b 
 
 U. S. courts ; decisions on public 
 boundaries, c 
 
 Spanish grants ; wliile Spain was 
 in wrongful possession, d 
 
 Judgments ; power of court after 
 term, e 
 
 HENDERSON -r. TBNTifESSEB, 10 H. 311. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to a 20 H, 
 State court; decision mustbe against 
 the title set up or claimed 6i/ the 
 losing party for himself, a 
 
 a 1 P. 97, Hiclde ». Starlt. 
 6 6 P. 706, U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 c 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 d 3 H. 219, Pollard v. Hagan. 
 ci 3 H. 756, Ilickie ». Stewart. 
 e 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. v. Mass. 
 d 9 H. 167, LaRocho v. Jones. 
 d 10 H. 641, Robinson v. Minor. 
 
 4, Wynn v. Morris. 
 a 22 H. 160, Hale v. Gaines. 
 a 1 Bl. 473, Verden v. Coleman. 
 a 91 U. S. 114, Long v. Converse. 
 
 HENDEBSON'S TOBACCO, 11 Wall. 657. 
 
 Statutes; repugnancy; repeal, a I a 17 Wall. 431, State ». StoU. 
 
 I a 20 Wall. 617, Murdockc. Memphis 
 
 HENDBEN, N. T. LIEB INS. CO. v. See N. T. Life Ins. Co. u. Hendren. 
 HENSBICKS, CASTBO v. See Castro v. Hendricks. 
 HENDBICKSON v. HINCKLEY, 17 H. 443. 
 
 Equity ; enjoining judgments, a | a 94 U. S. 653, Crim «. Handley. 
 
 HENNEN, EX PAKTE, 13 P. 361. 
 
 Officers ; when power to appoint I a 4 Wall. 632, Ware v. U. S. 
 Includes power to remove, a \ 
 
 HENNEN, GAINES T. See Gaines v. Hennen. 
 HENBT CO. V. NICHOIiAT, 95 V. S, 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; Missouri Constitution 1865. a 
 
 Elections to authorize subscrip- 
 tion ; two-thirds vote. 6 
 
 Etfect of consolidation of roads, c 
 
 619.^ 
 
 a 96 U. S. 685, EayCo.uVansyde 
 a 97 U. S. 278, Macon Co. u Shores 
 6 99 U. S. 220, Supv. v. Galbraith. 
 b 100 U. S. 590, Cass Co. v. Gillett. 
 c 101 U. S. 91, Empire v. Darling- 
 ton. 
 
 HENSHAW V. BISSELl, 18 WaU. 267. 
 
 I.andtitles; -'floating grants." a 
 
 Estoppel. 6 
 
 Limitations ; statute does not run 
 until title is perfected, c 
 HENSBLAW, ELIASON v. See Eliason v. Hensliaw. 
 HENSLEB, ANDBEWS v. See Andrews u. Hensler, 
 HEPBTJBN v. AULD, 1 Cr. 321. 
 
 Tender of payment, a 
 HEPBUBN V. ACXD, 5 Cr. 370. 
 
 Specific performance, a 
 
 a 92 U. S. 477, Miller v. Dale. 
 6 93 U. S. 336, Brant v. Iron Co. 
 c 98 U. S. 16. Palmer v. Low. 
 
 a 1 Wh. 178, Hepburn v. Dunlap. 
 
 a I Wll. 178, Hepburn v. Dunlap. 
 a 2 Wh. 297, Morgan v. Morgan. 
 
 HEPBUBN, DUBOIS v. See Dubois v. Hepburn. 
 HEBBUBN V. DUNI-AP, % Wh. 179. 
 
 Land; legal title; when equity 
 will not take away, a 
 Jurisdiction of equity, b 
 Rescission, c 
 
 a 12 P. 294, Galloway v. Pinley. 
 6 6 H. 117, Davis v. Tiletson. 
 c 15 Wall. 379, Kimball v. West. 
 
132 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 HEPBURN V. ELIiZEY, 8 Cr. 453. 
 
 District of Columbia ; citizen of, a 5 H. 374, Scatt v. Jones, 
 not a citizen of a "State." a a 6 Wall. 286, Barney v. Baltitn'e 
 
 a 12 Wall. 86, K. K. Co. v. Harris 
 
 HEPBURN V. GRISWOU), 8 Wall. 606. 
 
 Constitution ; powers of Con- I a 12 Wall. 539, Leo;al Teiicler Gas. 
 gi-ess; legal tender, a 1 
 
 HEPBURN, MIMA QUEEN v. See Mima Queen v. Hepburn. 
 HEPBURN T. SCHOOI. DIRECTORS, 83 Wall. 483. 
 
 National banks ; assessment of I a 94 U. S. 417, People v. Com'rs. 
 sliai-es for taxation, a | a 9.5 U. S. 21, Adams u. Nashville. 
 
 HERBERT, BAJVK OP ALEXANDRIA v. See Bank otAlex. v. Herbert. 
 HERNANDEZ, MONTGOMERY v. See Montgomery i). Hernandez. 
 HERNDON V. HOWARD, 9 WaU. 664. 
 
 Supreme Court; substitution of I a 12 Wall. 382, Knox v. Bank. 
 assignee In bankruptcy as a party, a I 
 HERNDON, MASTERSON v. See Masterson v. Hemdon. 
 HERNDON V. REOGWAT, 17 H. 484. 
 
 a 20 H. 214, Chaffee v. Hayvvard. 
 6 18 Wall. 580, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 
 U. S. courts ; jurisdiction ; non 
 resident defendants ; service, a 
 
 Removal; severance, b 
 HERRON, U. S. V. See U. S. ». Herron. 
 HEBVEY V. RHODE ISLAND tOC. WORKS, 93 U. S. 664. 
 
 Chattel raoi-tgages; recordhig. a | a 99 U. S. 250, Fosdick ». Schall. 
 HETH, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Heth. 
 HETTICH, EVANS v. See Evans v. Hettioh. 
 HIATTS, BROWN v. See Brown v. Hiatts. 
 HIAWATHA, THE, 8 Bl. 67'i'. 
 
 Prize ; violation of blockade, a \a3 Wall. 615, The Admiral. 
 
 HICKEY v. STEWART, 3 H. 768. 
 
 Judgments; setting aside after 
 terjn. a 
 
 Jurisdiction. 6 
 
 Spanish grants north 81 degrees : 
 validity of. c 
 
 HICKIE V. STARKE, 1 P. 98. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court ; Federal question, a 
 
 Land titles; confirmation to 
 "actual settlers ;" how settlement 
 must be shown. 6 
 
 HICKMAN V. JONES, 9 WaU. 801. 
 
 Jury; when the judge bound to 
 leave a case to the jury, a 
 Acts in aid of the rebellion void. 6 
 
 HICKS V. KELSBY, 18 WaU. 670. 
 
 Patent law; "inventions." a 
 
 a en. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 6 8 H. 531, Williamson v. Beny. 
 c 9 H. 167, La Roche v. Jones, 
 c 10 H. 641, Robinson v. Minor. 
 b 18 Wall. 467, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 a 10 P. 369, Crowell v. Randell. 
 6 16 H. 507, Guitard v. Stoddard. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 284, Com'rs v. Clark. 
 a 95 U. S. 238, Ins. Co. v. Rodel. 
 96 U. S. 195, Dewing v. Perdic- 
 
 aries. 
 102 U. S. 419, Daniels v. Tearuey 
 
 a 92 U. S. 354, Reckendorfer v. 
 
 Faber. 
 a 94 U. S. 198, Dunbar v. Myers. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 133 
 
 HICKS, STJMNEB v. See Samner v. Hicks. 
 HIGGKSTBOTTAM, FOTVXEB v. See Fowler v. Higginbottam. 
 HIGGS, HUGH v. See Hugh v. Higgs. 
 HIGUEBAS V. U. S., S "WaU. 887. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; char- 
 acter of grants, a 
 
 Concessions; location; surveys, b 
 
 a 8 Wall. 339, Alviso v. U. S. 
 a 92 U. S. 457, Williams v. U. S. 
 6 98 U. S. 214, Snyder u. Sickles. 
 6 101 U. S. 804, Trenier U.Stewart 
 
 HHit, NELSON V. See Nelson v. Hill. 
 HIMj t. SMITH, 81 H. 885. 
 
 Guaranty; demurrer to action | 
 on. a I 
 
 a 21 H. 490. 
 
 Clearwater v. Mere- 
 dith. 
 
 HTLL T. THOMPSON, 94 TJ. S. 388. 
 
 Bankruptcy; supervisory juris- I a98 U. S. 369, Clev. Ins. Co. v. 
 diction of the Circuit Court, a \ Globe Ins. Co. 
 
 ITTT.T. T. TUCKEB, 13 H. 458. 
 
 Executors and administrators ; 
 appointment in different jurisdic- 
 tions ; judgments against, a 
 
 HUX V. V. S., 9 H. 389. 
 
 Government cannot be sued ex- 
 cept by its consent, o 
 
 HTMEIiT, BOSE v. See Eose d. Himely. 
 HIMELET V. BOSE, 5 Cr. 319. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandate ; sec- j a 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. ». Moss, 
 ond writ of error, a | a 17 Wall. 284, Tyler v. Magvvire. 
 
 HINCKXEY, HENDEICKSON v. See Hendrickson v. Hinckley. 
 HTNDE v. LONGWOBTH, 11 Wh. 199. 
 
 a 13 H. 469, Godall v. Tucker. 
 
 a 11 H. 287, Reeside v. Walker. 
 a 6 WaU. 488, U. S. v. Ecliford. 
 
 t 
 
 Conveyances in fraud of credit- 
 or.s. a 
 
 Exceptions to admission of evi- 
 dence. 6. 
 
 a 12 P. 178, Clarke v. White. 
 a 13 H. 97, Parish v. Murphree. 
 b 20 WaU. 133, Burton v. Driggs. 
 a 91 U. S. 485, Lloyd v. Pulton. 
 a 94 TJ. S. 2S, Humes v. Scruggs. 
 
 HXNDE, MJiXLON v. See Mallon v. Hinde. 
 HINDB V. TATTIEB, 5 P. 398. 
 
 Eviilence ; laws of the U.S. a | as 14 H. 412, Ennis v. Smith. 
 HINDE, VATTEEE V. See Vattier o. Hinde. 
 HINE AND TBEVOB, THE, 4 WaU. 465 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; ebb and 
 flow of tide ; navigable waters 
 
 Remedy in State courts for en- 
 forcementof maritime contracts, b 
 
 Attaclimeut of vessels not a pro- 
 ceeding ill admiralty, c 
 
 a 7 WaU. 289, R. R. Co. v. 
 
 Schurmier. 
 a 7 WaU. 641, The Belfast. 
 a 8 Wall. 20, The Eagle. 
 a 10 Wall. 563, The Daniel Ball. 
 & 11 WaU. 191, Leon v. Galceran. 
 fi 15 WaU. 384, Pennywiti) Eaton 
 b 16 WaU. 531, St. Co. v. Chase. 
 6 21 Willi. 556, Edwards v. Elliott 
 b 93 U. S. 366, Norton v. Switzer 
 a 102 U. S. 119, Schoonmaker v. 
 
 Gilmore. 
 
134 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIOIirS. 
 
 HINSON T. LOTT, S Wall. 151. 
 
 Constitution; "'privileges and 
 iramiinities." a 
 Tax on imports, b 
 
 HIPP V. BABCN, 19 H. 878. 
 
 Equity; no jurisdiction where 
 complete remedy at law. a 
 
 Objection can be raised at any 
 time, b 
 
 HIRAM, THE, 1 Wh. 440. 
 
 Judgments ; mistake ; equity ju- 
 risdiction, a 
 
 HIKIAKT T. BAULOTT, 9 P. 1S6. 
 
 Louisiana; practice of U. S. 
 courts ; act of 1824. a 
 Jury trial ; waiver of. 6 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, c 
 
 HITCHCOCK T. GAITESTON, 96 V. S. 341. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 429, Ward v. Maryland 
 6 13 Wall. 34, Low v. Austin. 
 6 97 U. S. 573, Cook v. Ponn. 
 6 100 IT. S. 438, Guy v. Baltimore. 
 6 100 U. S. 678, Macb. Co. v. Gage 
 
 a 2 Bl. 551, Parker v. Cotton Co. 
 a 1 Wall. 22, Wright v. Ellison. 
 a 7 Wall. 618, Moj'gan v. Beloit. 
 a 13 Wall. 621, Ins. Co. v. Bailey. 
 a 15 Wall. 228, Oelrichs t-. Spain. 
 a 15 Wall. 375, Gi-and Chute v. 
 
 Winegar. 
 a 16 Wall. 435, U. S. v. Hnckabee. 
 6 17 Wall. 284, Tyler v. Ma-wire. 
 a 23 Wall. 470, Lewis v. Cocks. 
 a 98 U. S. S3, Ivinson v. Hutton. 
 
 a 101 U. 8. 584, Walden v. Skinner 
 
 ffi 9 P. 652, Livingston v. Story. 
 b 12 Wall. 281, Kearney v. Case, 
 c 23 Wall. 288, 'i'homas v. Wool- 
 dridge. 
 
 Municipal corporations ; power 
 to contract, a 
 Powertoissue negotiable bonds. 6 
 
 a 98 U. S. 315, Little Eock». Bank 
 b 99 U. S. 159, U. S. v. Tort Scott. 
 
 HOAG, SATTSTEK v. See Sawyer ■c. Hoag. 
 HOBABT V. DKOGAW, 10 P. HI. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction; maritime 
 contracts; pilotage, a 
 
 Appeals in salvage cases discour- 
 aged. 6 
 
 a 6 H. 378, Nav. Co. v. Bank. 
 b 19 H. 156, Post V. Jones. 
 6 8 Wall. 479, The Comanche. 
 a 13 Wall. 243, ex parte McNeil. 
 
 HOBBY, KEI.SEY v. See Kelsey v. Hobby. 
 
 HOBOKEK CO., BRIDGE PRO. V. See Bridge Pro. v. Hoboken Co. 
 HOBOKEN LAND CO., MURRAY v. See Murray „. Hoboken Land Co. 
 HOBSOK M. McABTHDR, 16 P. 195. 
 
 Equity; general relief, a I « 17 H. 455, Stevens ». Gladdin? 
 
 Dismissal of b>ll without preju- 6 7 Wall. 110, Durant«Essex Co. 
 ^"'^- ^ I a 96 U. S. 615, Hayward v. Bank. 
 
 HODGE, COOMBS v. See Coombs v. Hodge. 
 HODGE, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Hodge. 
 HODGE V. WILHAMS, 88 H. 87. 
 
 Supreme Court ; citation ; service 
 of. a 
 Amendment of writ of error, b 
 
 HODGES. NICHOLLS v. See Nicholls v. Hodges. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 496, Washington v Den- 
 
 , nison. 
 
 b 11 Wall. 86, The Protector. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 135 
 
 HODGSON V. BUTTS, 3 Cr. 150. 
 
 Virginia ; mortotage of jjersoiial | a 13 P. 110, Bank of U. S. v. Lee. 
 proporty 
 
 a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 6 2 Wall. 1S6, Sheets v. Selden. 
 
 recording, a | 
 
 HODGSON, DTJI.ANT v. See Dulany v. Hodgson. 
 HODGSON V. DEXTER, 1 Cr. 34S. 
 
 Public agents ; liability, a 
 Wlien their ac's are tliose of tlie 
 State. 6 
 
 HODGSON, MAKINE INS, CO. v. See Marine Ins. Co. •!;. Hodgson. 
 
 HODGSON, MOCNTZ v. See Mountz v. Hodgson. 
 
 HODGSON, ORR v. See Orr v. Hodgson. 
 
 HODSON, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Hodson. 
 
 HOEY, McBRIDE v. See McBride v. Hoey. 
 
 HOFFSIAN, V. S. v. See U. S. v. Hoffman. 
 
 HOGAJS^ V. PAGE, a ■Wan. 607. 
 
 Land titles ; patents and patent 
 certiflcates; "legal representa- 
 tives;" enuremeut. a 
 
 a 19 Wall. 14-5, Carpenter »Rannels 
 a 22 Wall. 261, Connoyer v Schaffer 
 
 HOGAN V. ROSS, 11 H. 397. 
 
 Writs of error ; Supreme Court ; 
 no power in the U. S. courts to dis- 
 pense with provisions of tlie acts 
 regulating, a 
 
 Supersedeas. 6 
 
 HOGAN V. ROSS, 13 H. 181. 
 
 Pleading; where plea only an- 
 swers part of the declai-ation. a 
 
 HOGG V. EMERSON, 6 H. 437. 
 
 Patent law ; writs of error; spe- 
 cifications ; combinations, a I 
 
 HOGSHEADS OF SUGAR, BOTI.E v. See 30 Hogsheads of Sugar v. Boyle. 
 
 HOHNBACH, ERSKINE v. See Erskine v. Hohnbach. 
 
 HOI.BROOK, McNEILIi v. See McNeill v. Holbrook. 
 
 HOtCOMBE, TRACY v. See Tracy v. Holcombe. 
 
 HOtl/AND, FIELD V. See Field v. Holland. 
 
 HOLMDAY T. BATSON, 4 H. 645. 
 
 AVrits of error and appeals; all I u 12 H. 21, Smith v. Clark. 
 
 a 12 H. 389, Saltmar.sli v. Tntliill. 
 6 10 Wall. 291, Slaughter-IIoHse 
 
 Cases. 
 b 12 Wall. 100, French D Shoemaker 
 6 93 U. S. 88, Kitchen v Randolph 
 6 93 U. S.417, Sage v. II. R. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 91, Aurora v. West. 
 
 a 11 H. 603, Hogg v. Emerson. 
 
 parties must bo named, a 
 
 a 11 Wall. 87, The Protector. 
 
 HOri-IDAY, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Holliday. 
 HOLIINGSWORTH t. BABBOUR, 4 P. 466. 
 
 Jurisdiction; judgment witliout 
 notice; void and voidable judg- 
 ments, a 
 
 a 14 II. 337, Harris v. Hardeman. 
 a 24 H. 205, Nations v. Johnson, 
 a 91 U. S. 508, Earle v. McVeigh. 
 
 HOLMNGSWORTH v. VIRGINIA, 3 DaU. 378. 
 
 Sup. Ct. ; suits between States, a | a 1 P. 110, Georgia w. Madrazo. 
 HOLLINGSWORTH, WRIGHT T. See Wriglit v. HoUingsworth. 
 HOLMAN, WATKINS v. See Watkins v. Holman. 
 HOI^MX, FENN V. See Fenu v. Holme. 
 
136 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 HOLMES V. JENNISON, 14 P. 568. 
 
 Constitution ; police power, a 
 Power to regulate commerce; 
 
 when the powers of Congress are 
 
 exclusive. 6 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter 
 
 in dispute means a property valne. c 
 What is a "suit." d 
 "Treaty-maliing power." e 
 
 HOLBEES V. TKOUT, ? P. ai8. 
 
 Boundaries; monuments, a 
 HOLMES, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Folmes. 
 HOLTOKE CO. v. LYMAN, 
 
 o 5 H. 618, Liceus(! Cases. (Opin. 
 
 Woodbury, J.) 
 6 7 H. 392, Passenger Cas. (Opin. 
 
 McLean, J.) 
 c 1 Bl. 272, Pratt v. Fitzliugh. 
 d 4 Wall. 113, ex parte Millegan. 
 e 17 Wall. 243, Holden v. Joy. 
 d 91 U. S. 375, Kohl v. U. S. 
 
 a 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile. 
 
 15 "Wall. 519. 
 
 Constitution ; corporate charters ; la 99 U. S. 720, Siiiliing Fund Ca*. 
 legislative power over, a | o 101 U. S. .539, R. R. Co. v. Phila. 
 
 HOME OF THE FKIENDLESS v. ROUSE, S WaU. 430. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; exemption from taxation, a 
 
 a 13 Wall. 37G, Salt Co. v. East 
 
 Sa'.;iuaw. 
 a 15 Wall. 4.58, Toinlinson « Jessup 
 a 21 Wall. 498, R. R. v. Penn. 
 a 93 U. S. 223, Morgan j; Louisiana 
 a 95 U. S. 690, Farringtou v. Tenn 
 
 93 U. S. 116. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error to I a 102 U. S. 417, Daniels v. Tearney 
 State courts ; Federal question, a \ 
 
 HOMER T. COLLECTOR, 1 Wall. 486. 
 
 HOME INS. CO. T. ATTGirSTA, 
 
 Revenue laws ; construction ; ar- 
 ticles "ejusdem generis." a 
 
 a 13 Wall. 165, Reiche v. Smythe. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 147, Movius v. Arthur. 
 
 a 96 U. S. Ill, Arthur v. Movius. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 113, Arthur v. Lahcy. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 127, Arthurs. Stephaul. 
 
 HOMESTEAD CO. v. VALLEY CO., 17 WaJl. 163. 
 
 Grants by Congress to States for 
 railroads ; Des Moines River grant 
 to Iowa, a 
 
 a 101 U. S. 767, Wolsey v. Chap- 
 man. 
 a 101 U. S. 774, Litchfield v. Web- 
 ster Co. 
 HONEY, SMITH v. See Smith v. Honey. 
 
 HOFPNAGLE v. ANDERSON, 7 Wll. 813. 
 
 Land laws; patent is an appro- 
 
 priation of the laud, a 
 
 Patent unassailable at law by any 
 title after its emanation. 6 
 
 Warrants; when their illegality 
 can be inquired into after patent, c 
 
 a 9 Wh. 502, Stephens v. McCargo 
 o 3 P. 336, Stringer u. Young. 
 6 6 P. 672, Lindsey v. Miller, 
 c 6 P. 706, U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 c 12 P. 294, Galloway v. Finley. 
 c 15 P. 104, Brush v. Wear, 
 c 20 H. 265, Spenser v. Lapslev. 
 
 HOOE, TJ. S. V. See U. S. v Hooe. 
 HOOK, PAYNE v. See Payne v. Hook. 
 HOOPER V. SCHEIMEK, 33 H. 348. 
 
 ent^" a' ™"'^^' *'^"*^'''"^"' ' l"*'" I « 1 Bl. 346, Clagett v. Kilbourne. 
 HOOVER, DYNES v. See Dynes «. Hoover. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPKEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 137 
 
 HOOVER V. WEST, 91 V. S. 308. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; fraudulent prefer- i a 102 U. S. 268, Eogei's v. Palmer, 
 euces. a 
 
 HOPE, THE. See Columbia Ins. Co. v. Ashby. 
 HOPE rSS. CO. V. BOAKDMAN, 5 Cr. 57. 
 
 TJ. S. coui'ts ; juriscliction where 
 a corporation is a party; citizen- 
 ship, a 
 
 HOPKINS T. tEE, 6 Wll. 116. 
 
 Decrees in chancery ; conclusive- 
 ness of ; res judicata, a 
 
 HOPKIRK V. BEIX, 3 Cr. 458. 
 
 War; effect on contracts; sus- 1 
 pension of remedy ; limitations, a \ 
 
 HOPPET, THE, V. U. S., 7 Cr. 389. 
 
 Admiralty; if an act inflicts a 
 forfeiture of vessel for an imjjorta- 
 tion with knowledge of the master, 
 this knowledge must be averred in 
 libel, a 
 
 Informations. 6 
 
 a 20 H. 231, Covington Drawbridge 
 Co. V. Sheppartl. 
 a 8 Wall. 178, Paul v. Virginia. 
 
 a 12 P. 491, ex parte Sibbold. 
 a 1 H. 147, Bank U. S. v. Bevely. 
 a 7 H. 215, Smith v. Kernichen. 
 a 16 H. 74, Pennington v. Gibson. 
 a 24 H. 579, Gaines v. Hennen. 
 a 7 Wall. 101, Aurora v. West. 
 
 u, 6 Wall. 541, Hanger v. Abbott. 
 a 10 Wall. 222, Braunu. Sauerwein 
 
 a 1 Cr. 570, The Anne v. IT. S. 
 & 9 Wh. 391, The Merino. 
 6 5 Wall. 68, U. S. v. Weed. 
 6 16 Wall. '431, U. S. v. HucUabee. 
 6 20 Wall. 110, Confiscation Cases. 
 & 95 U. S. 586, U. S. v. Mann. 
 
 HOKN, BAJSK OF TENNESSEE v. See Bank of Tennessee v. Horn. 
 HOKN V. liOCKHAKT, 17 WaU. 580. 
 
 The civil war ; what acts of the 
 Confederate States valid, a 
 Acts in aid of the rebellion void . 6 
 Executors; liability for invest- 
 ments in Confederate securities, c 
 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 h 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 c 
 
 HOKNBUCKLE V. TOOMBS, 18 WaU. 
 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 
 Territorial courts; whether gov- 
 erned by equity rules, a 
 District of Columbia courts. & 
 
 22 WaU. 103, U. S. v. Ins. Co. 
 22 Wall. 491, Taylor v. Thomas. 
 91 U. S. 596, Boiling v. Lersner. 
 91 U. S. 642, Knotts v. Stearns. 
 
 96 U. S. 192, Williams v. Braffy. 
 
 97 U. S. 464, Keith v. Clark. 
 
 99 U. S. 190, Ketchum v Buckley 
 99 U. S. 571, McBurney !) Carson 
 
 6S». 
 
 18 Wall. 
 95 U. S. 
 98 U. S. 
 
 661, Davis v. Bilsland. 
 98, Good V. Martin. 
 154, Reynolds v. U. S. 
 100 U. S. 103, Hurt v. HoUings- 
 worth. 
 6 102 U. S. 068, Page v Burnstine. 
 
 HORNSBT V. U. S., 10 WaU. 338. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; im- I a 
 perfect grants ; how divested, a \ a 
 
 18 Wall. 263, HensIiawB. Bissell. 
 97 U. S. 217, McMicken v. U. S. 
 
 HOKNTHAI.! v. THE COH/ECTOK, 9 WaU. 564. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 8, Coll'r v. Hubbard. 
 b 12 Wall. 135, Mail Co. v Flanders 
 a 98 U. S. 225, Andras v. Kedtield. 
 
 HOKST, INDIANAPOIiIS B. K. v. See Indianapolis E. E. v. Horst. 
 HOBWITZ, BTJTLBB v. See Butler v. Horwitz. 
 
 Suit to recover back duties, o 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; citi- 
 zenship, b 
 
138 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 HOTCHKISS v. 
 
 Patent law ; 
 
 GKEESfWOOD, 
 
 " inventions." 
 
 11 H. »48. 
 
 HOT SPRINGS CASES, 93 U. S. 698 
 
 Pre-emption of land reserved, a 
 HOUGH, liLOYB v. See Lloyd.i!. Hougli. 
 HOUGHTON T. JONES, 1 Wall. 702. 
 
 Evidence; ci-oss-examination. a 
 
 HOUSE v. MULtEN, 2S Wall. 43. 
 
 Parties; reversals for want of 
 proper parties by Supreme Couit. a 
 
 a 18 Wall. 674, Hieks v. Kelsey. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 563, Collar Co. b. Van 
 Dusen. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 41, Brown v. Piper. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 352, Keckendorfer v Fa- 
 be r. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 492, Smith v. Dental Co 
 a 94 U. S. 197, Dunbar v. Myers. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 4, Gaines v. Hale. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 626, Wills v. Russell. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 426, Kendig ». Dean, 
 a 97 U. S. 457, Keith v. Clark. 
 a 102 U. S. 563, Goodman v. Nib- 
 lack. 
 
 HOUSEMAN, CtATMN v. See Claflin v. Houseman. 
 HOUSEMAN V. THE NOKTH CAROLINA, 15 P. 49. 
 
 Admiralty ; right of agent of ab- 
 sent owners to libel, a 
 
 Salvage ; in whose name libel 
 should l3e tiled. 6 
 
 Increase of damages; who can 
 apply for. c i 
 
 Stipulations, d 
 
 HOUSTON V. CITY BANK, 6 H. 504. 
 
 Bankrupt court ; mortgages, a 
 
 HOUSTON V. MOORE, 3 Wli. 433. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 
 HOUSTON V. MOORE, 5 Wh. 1. 
 
 Militia; calling out; "requisi- 
 tion " of the President, a 
 
 Constitution ; concurrent pow- 
 ers. 6 
 
 Rights of the States to legislate 
 on subjects delegated to the U. S., 
 in absence of action by Congress, f 
 
 a 21 H. 355, McKinlcy ». Morrish. 
 b 10 Wall. 11, The Blackwell. 
 a 14 Wall. 109, The Thame.-;, 
 a 14 Wall. 266, Vaughan v. The 
 
 Telcgriipli. 
 c 91 U. S. 36ff, Tho D. R. Martin. 
 d 95 U. S. on. The Wanata. 
 d 99 U. S. 43, U. S. v. Ames. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 134, Ray ». Nosewortliy 
 a 11 H. 28, U. 8. v. Girault. 
 
 a]2Wh. 19, M-.irtin u. Mott. 
 
 b 14 P. 561, Holmes v. Jennison. 
 
 c 16 P. 608, Piigg r.Comra. Penn. 
 
 c 5 H. 573, License Cases. (Opin. 
 Taney, Ch. J.) 
 
 c 7 H. 392, Pas'ger Cases. (Opin. 
 McLean, J.) 
 
 c 12 H. 311, Cooley v. Wardens. 
 
 b 3 Wall. 730, Gihnan v. Phila. 
 
 c 93 U. S. 141, Claflin v. House- 
 man. 
 
 HOWARD, HBRNBON t. See Herndon i>. Howard. 
 HOWARD, MASTBRSON v. See Masterson „. Howard. 
 HOWARD, PEYROUX v. See Peyroux v. Howard. 
 HOWARD, RAILROAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Howard. 
 HOWARD, RANDELL v. See Randell v. Howard. 
 HOWARD, RUBBER TIP PENCIL CO. v. See Rubber Tip Co. .. Howard. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 139 
 
 HOWAKD, SPECHT v. See Specht v. Howajd. 
 HOWE, FREEMJU* v. See Freeman v. Howard. 
 HOWEM,, BAKCLAY v. See Barclay v. Howell. 
 HOWXAND, U. S. V. See U. S. a. Howland. 
 HOTT, EX PAKTE, 13 P. 879. 
 
 Mandamus ; will not lie to direct 
 a judge as to tlie exercise of his 
 discretion, a 
 
 HOTT, BEND v. See Bend v. Hoyt. 
 HOTT, GELSTON v. See Gelstou v. Hoyt, 
 HOTT, RANKIN v. See Bankln v. Hoyt. 
 HOTT V. SHEXDON, 1 Bl. 518. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error to 
 State courts ; Federal question, a 
 
 HOTT V. V. S., 10 H. 109. 
 
 Public officers ; bonds ; sureties ; 
 Treasury transcripts, a 
 Extra compensation. 6 
 Collectors, c 
 
 a 22 H. 181, Crawford U.Addison. 
 a 14 Wall. 165, ex parte ISfewman. 
 a 101 U. S. 720, exparte Railway. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 
 a 21 Wall. 
 
 510, Messengers. Mason 
 550, Edwards ». Elliott. 
 
 13 H. 479, U. S. u. Hodge. 
 
 17 H. 438, Bruce v. U. S. 
 7 Wall. 3-12, tJ.S.M. Shoemaker. 
 
 19 Wall. 213, U. S. v. Gaussen. 
 
 23 Wall. 399, Donovan v. U. S. 
 a 100 U. S. 11, Soule v. U. 8. 
 a 102 U. S. 554, U. S. v. Piiison. 
 
 u. 8 Wall. 314. Mandelbaiun y.Tlie 
 
 People. 
 a 16 Wall. 165, Garnharts v. U. S. 
 6 21 Wall. 5.52, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 a 93 U. S. 17, Fuller v. Claflin. 
 
 HOZBT V. BUCHANAN, 16 P. 217. 
 
 Error ; striking out of an answer 
 valid defense, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; amendment of 
 judgment by court below after writ 
 of error. 6 
 
 HUBBARD, CHURCH v. See Churcli d. Hubbard. 
 HUBBARD, COUjECTOR v. See Collector v. Hubbard. 
 HUCEABEE, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Huckabee. 
 HUDDIiESON, ATCHTNSON v. 'See Atchinson v. Huddleson. 
 HUDGINS T. BJEMP, 18 H. 530. 
 
 Supreme Court appeal ; a matter 
 of right, a 
 
 Supersedeas. 6 
 
 HUDSON V. GUESTIER, 4 Cr. 293. 
 
 Prize ; sale before condemna- 1 
 tion. a ' 
 
 HUDSON V. GUESTIER, 6 Cr. 883. 
 
 Admiralty; sentences in rem. a 
 
 a 6 Wall. 107, U. S. b. Adams. 
 6 9 Wall . 291, Slaughter -House 
 
 Oq ope 
 
 6 19 Wall. 427, Tel. Co. v. Ey.«er. 
 6 93 TJ. S. 88, Kitchen u Randolph 
 
 a 13 H. 512, Jeckeri). Montgomery. 
 
 a 7 Cr. 432, Williams v. Amroyd. 
 a 12 P. 738, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 a 23 Wall. 465, The Rio Grande, 
 
 a I a 17 Wall. 283, Tvler v. Magwire. 
 I a 102 U. S. 107, Brooks y. R.R Co. 
 
 HUDSON, U. S. V. See U. S. ■a. Hudson. 
 
 HUDSON & GOODWIN, U. S. v. See U. S. a. Hudson & Goodwin. 
 
 ETUDSON RIVER BB. CO., SILI-IMAN v. See SilUman «. Hudson River Br. Co. 
 
 HUERTA8, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Huertas. 
 
 HUDSON V. GUESTIER, 7 Cr. 1. 
 
 Supreme Court ; rehearings. 
 
140 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 HUFF V. HUTCHINSON, 14 H. 587. 
 
 Jurisdiction; jiKlgmenta. a 
 U. S. courts ; citizensliip ; admin- 
 istrators, h 
 Judgments of IT. S. courts, c 
 
 a 5 Wall. 305, Christmas v. Russell 
 ft 13 Wall. 67, Rice o. Houston, 
 c 91 U, S. 661, Lamp v. Brass Co. 
 
 HUGFB V. SOUTH CAROLINA, 3 Dall. 371. 
 
 Supreme Court; suits against I a 5 P. 287, JST. Jersey u. N. York. 
 States; process, a \ 
 
 HUGG V. AUGUSTA INS. CO., 1 H. 695. 
 
 Marine insurance; insurance on | a 22 H. 116, Ins. Co. ». Mordecai 
 freight ; at what time applied, a 6 19 Wall. 643, Ins. Co. u.Foo'artv 
 Totalloss. h B }■ 
 
 HUGH T. HIGGS, 8 Wh. 697. 
 
 Equity ; action at law on a de- 
 cree, a 
 
 HUGHES T. BtAKE, 6 Wh. 468. 
 
 Equity pleading, a 
 
 When an answer is evidence. 6 
 
 HUGHES V. EDWARDS, 9 Wh. 489. 
 
 Equity; stale claims; laches; 
 when right to redeem barred, a 
 
 Presumption of grant; lapse of 
 time. 6 
 
 Aliens; right to hold property; 
 foreclosure by. c 
 
 Equity; jurisdiction to prevent 
 fraud ; parol evidence, d 
 
 Mortgage ; alienation of property 
 mortgaged; how lien enforced, e 
 
 a 16 H. 74, Pennington v. Gibson. 
 
 a 10 P. 200, Boon v. Cliilos. 
 a 14 P. 2.51. Rhode Island v. Mass 
 6 2 Wall. 430, Tobey v. Leonards 
 b 16 Wall. 30, Voorhees v. Bone- 
 steel. 
 6 99 U. S. 206, Godden v. Kiminell. 
 
 44, Willison v. WatUiiis. 
 480, Pavton v. Stitli. 
 413, Piatt V. Vat tier. 
 180, Boon V. Cliilcs. 
 189, Bowman v. Watlieii. 
 294, Zcller v. Eckert. 
 102, Neilson v. Lagow. 
 576, Slicerw. Bank. 
 S. 336, Pcugh V. Davis. 
 S, 516, Brick u. Brick. 
 S. 489, Hauensteiu!). Lyn- 
 
 hnm. 
 S. 640, Bank v. Creswell. 
 
 a 
 
 3P 
 
 a 
 
 5P 
 
 a 
 
 9 P. 
 
 a 
 
 10 P 
 
 a 
 
 IH 
 
 b 
 
 4H 
 
 c 
 
 12 H 
 
 a 
 
 16 H 
 
 d 
 
 96 U. 
 
 d 
 
 98 U 
 
 c 100 U, 
 
 e 100 U. 
 
 ). Hughes. 
 v. Hughes. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 109, Durantc.EssexCo. 
 b 96 U. S. 533, Moore v. Bobbins. 
 
 HUGHES, HEDRICK v. See Hedrick i 
 HUGHES, ORCHARD v. See Orchard 
 HUGHES v. U. S., 4 WaU. 837. 
 
 Judgments; when they can be 
 pleaded in bar. a 
 Patents ; vacating ; eq\nty. & 
 
 HUGHES, U. S. V. See U. S. „. Hughes. 
 HUIDEKOPER v. DOUGLASS, 3 Cr. 1. 
 
 Land laws Of Pennsylvania.' a | a 6 P. 691, U. S. r. Arredondo. 
 HULINGS, ROACH v. See Roach ■». Hulings. 
 HUtl,, OWINGS V. See Owingsu. Hull. 
 HUMPHREY, DEPEAU v. See Depeau v. Humphrey. 
 HUMPHREYS, LEGGETT v. See Leggett .. Humphreys. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 141 
 
 HUatPHKET V. PEGUES, 16 Wall. 847. 
 
 Constitution; contract; exemp- 
 tion from taxation, a 
 
 Licenses revocable, b 
 
 Wliether exemption transferable 
 by tlie road, c 
 
 a 20 Wall. 42, E. E. v. Maguire. 
 a 21 Wall. 498, E. E. v. Penn. 
 a 93 U. S. 224, Morgan v. La. 
 b 94 U. S. 540, Dovle v. Ins. Co. 
 a 97 U. S. 710, E. E. u. Gaines. 
 c 102 U. S. 277, E. E. v. Hamblin. 
 
 HUMPHREYS V. liEGGETT, 9 H. 311. 
 
 Sureties on sheriff's bond, a 1 a 21 H. 71, Leggett v. Hiimpfireys. 
 HtINDl.ET, SIMS V. See Sims v. Hundley. 
 HUNGEKEOKD v. SIGERSON, 80 H. 161. 
 
 Equity ; relief against judg- I a 94 U. S. 654, Crim v. Handley. 
 nients. a \ 
 
 HUNT, KENNEDT t. See Kennedy v. Hunt. 
 HUNT V. PAXAO, 4 H. 589. 
 
 Territorial covrts ; effect of ad- 
 mission as a State on writs of error 
 from Supreme Court, a 
 
 Writ of error; direction of writ. 6 
 
 a 9 H. 239, Benner v. Porter. 
 a 10 H. 77, MoNulty v. Batty. 
 a 13 Wall. 448, Clinton v. Engle- 
 
 brecht. 
 6 91 U. S. 146, Atbertonu. Fowler. 
 
 HUNT V. KOUSMAJSXEKE, 8 Wh. 174, 
 
 Powers coupled with an inter- a 
 
 est. a b 
 
 Mistakes of law. 6 c 
 
 Parol evidence, c a 
 
 Sureties ; relief in equity, d c 
 
 Equity; jurisdiction in cases of d 
 
 mistake and fraud, e d 
 
 IP. 1, Huntu.Eousmaniere. 
 12 P. 48, Bank U. S. v. Daniel. 
 
 14 P. 203, Sprigg v. Bank. 
 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 9 H. 90, U. S. V. Price. 
 
 15 Wall. 144, Pickersgill v. La- 
 hens. 
 
 6 91 U. S. 50, Upton v. Trebil- 
 
 cock. 
 6 97 U. S. 185, Lambornu County 
 c 98 U. S. 82, Iviuson v. Hutton. 
 6 98 U. S. 90, Snell v. Ins. Co. 
 6 99 U. S. 46, U. S. v. Ames. 
 e 101 U. S. 584, Walden v. Skinner 
 
 a 24 H. 206, Nations v. Johnson. 
 b 13 Wall. 86, Johnson v. Towsley. 
 
 HUNT v. -WICBXIFFE, » P. 814. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; notice ; service by 
 publication, a 
 Land titles; patent; equity, b 
 
 HUNT, "WTLCOX v. See Wilcox v. Hunt. 
 HUNTER, BENNETT v. See Bennett v. Hunter. 
 HUNTER, FAIRFAX v. See Fairfax v. Hunter. 
 HUNTER, MARTIN V. See Martin i). Hunter. 
 HUNTER, SMITH v. See Smith v. Hunter. 
 HUNTER V. U. S., 5 P. 173. 
 
 To make a coliveyance effectual I a 12 P.131,Beastoni>.Farm. Bank, 
 there must be a grantee, ti \ 
 
 HUNTER V. WARTON. See Himeley v. Eose. 
 HUNTINGTON, BRADSTREBT v. See Bradstreet v. Huntington 
 HUNTINGTON, JACKSON v. See Jackson v. Huntington. 
 HUNTINGTON, TEESE V. See Teese v. Huntington. 
 
142 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 HUNTITfGXON v. TEXAS, 16 Wall. 403. 
 
 Rebellion ; acts in aid of ; " Texas 
 indemnity bonds ; " what acts of the 
 Confederate States were valid, a 
 
 a 20 Wall . 84, Nat. Bank b. Texas. 
 a 11 Wall. 490, Taylor v. Thomas. 
 a 91 U. S. 596, Boiling v. Lersner. 
 
 HXTRI-EY T. JONES, 97 U. S. 318. 
 
 Snpreme Conrt ; Bule 16 ; ap- [ a 99 U. S. 593, Alvord v. U. S. 
 peai-ance ; hearing, a \ 
 
 HUSEN, KAILBOAI) CO. v. See Eailroad Co. v. Husen. 
 ETUSSEY V. SMITH, 99 U. S. aO. 
 
 Pnblic lands; town-site act of I a 99 TJ. S. 614, Stringfellowj). Cain 
 1867 ; (14 St. 501 ;) entries, .a \ 
 
 HUTCHINS V. tow, 15 Wall. 77. 
 
 Public lands; pre-emption, a | a 96 IT. S. 518, 'Atherton u. Fowler. 
 HUTCHINSON, HUrr V. See Huff d. Hutchinson. 
 HYATT, VAN NESS v. See Van Ness v. Hyatt. 
 HYDE V. BOOBAEM, 16 P. 169. 
 
 Error; how far the Supreme | a 8 H. 483, Prentice u. Zane. 
 Court will review evidence, a | a 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 
 HYDE, CAKVER v. See Carver v: Hyde. 
 HYDE, HABKNESS v. See Harkness v. Hyde. 
 
 HYDE PABK EEBTIMZING CO. t, 
 HYDE T. STONE, 80 H. 175. 
 
 U.S. courts; jurisdiction; can- 
 not be impaired by State laws, a 
 
 HYLTON .T. U. S., 3 DaU. 171. 
 
 Constitution ; direct taxation, a 
 
 See Fertilizing Go. o. Hyde Parle. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 430, Payne u. Hook. 
 a 13 Wall. 287, K. R. v. Whitton. 
 
 a 18 H. 336. Dodge v. Woolaey. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 444. Ins. Co. v. Soule. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 545, Bank v. Fenno. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 347, Scholey v. Rew. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 517, Springer u. U. S. 
 HYLTON, WAKE v. See "Ware v. Hylton. 
 lASIGI V. BROWN, 17 H. 188. 
 
 Pi-ovince of the jury ; inferences la 21 H. 168, Barreda v. Silsby. 
 to be drawn from letters, a I a 101 U. S. 270, West v. Smith. 
 
 ELLINOIS, MOORE v. See Moore v. Illinois. 
 
 ILI.INOIS, MDNN T. 
 
 EDLINOIS CEN. B. 
 
 See Munn v. Illinois. 
 R. CO., BATES V. See Bates v. IlUnois Gen. R. K. Co. 
 II.I.INOIS & MIS. TEL. CO., OILMAN t. See Oilman v. 111. & Mis. Tel. Co, 
 IMBUSCH V. FARWELL, 1 Bl. 566. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; par- 
 ties ; act of February 28, 1S39. (5 
 St. 321.) a 
 
 a 6 Wall. 286, Barney v. Bait, 
 a 93 U. S. 204, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 
 IMPROVEMENT CO. v. MUNSON, 14 Wall. 448. 
 
 Jury; when a case must be left 
 to jury ; power of court to direct a 
 verdict, a 
 
 a 22 Wall. 120, Pleasants v. Fant. 
 )a 94 U. S. 284, Comm'rs ». Clark. 
 a 97 U. S. 320, Herbert v. Butler. 
 a 97 U. S. 412, Packages v. U. S. 
 a 101 U. S. 18, Bowditchu Boston 
 a 101 U. S. 844, Howard v. B. R. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 143 
 
 INDIANA, VINCENNES UNIVERSITY v. See Tinoennes University v. Ind. 
 INDIANAPOMS R. R. v. HORST. 93 V. S. 895. 
 
 Instruction* to the jnvy. a 
 V. S. courts ; practice ; liow far 
 governed by State procednre. 5 
 Statutes ; directory provisions, c 
 
 INGI.EE V. COOLIDGE, 3 Wlu 363. 
 
 Supreme Conrt ; writ of error to 
 State courts; how tiie Federal ques- 
 tion mu.-t appear, a 
 
 Agreed cases. 6 
 
 What is the Record, c 
 
 Dismissal for want of jurisdiction ; 
 costs, d 
 
 a 97 U. S. 695, KuchwEook Island 
 6 98 U. S. 558, Barnet v. Bank, 
 c 99 U. S. 217, Supervisors v. Gal- 
 braith. 
 
 a 2 P. 407, Siitterlee v. Mnttlicw- 
 
 son. 
 o 10 P. 368, Crowell v. Randell. 
 « 12 P. ion, Bcaston v. Bank. 
 6 16 P. 296, U. S. J). Eliason. 
 a loH. 207, Kanouse v. Martin. 
 c 20 H. 439. Suvdnm v. Williamson 
 c 1 Wall. 603,'Pomerov v. Bank. 
 d 9 Wall. 567, Hornthall v. Col'or. 
 
 INGnS V. SArLORS' SNUG HARBOR, 3 P. 115. 
 
 Dedication to public use ; when 
 valid as an executory devise, a 
 
 Wlio became citizens on Declara- 
 tion of Independence. 6 
 Chanije of alleariance. c 
 
 INNEBITT V. BTRNE, 5 H. 895. 
 
 Supreme Court ; citation, a 
 
 a 14 H. 271, University v. Indiana, 
 fi 17H. 531, U. S. V. Ritchie. 
 6 18 H. 236, MoKinney v. Savieajo. 
 c 20 H. 17, Jones v. McMasters. 
 c 20 H. 246, White v. Burnley. 
 a 95 U. S. 313, Ould v. Hospital. 
 
 a 18 H. 534, Hudgins v. Kemp. 
 
 rNNERARITT, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Innerarity, 
 INS. CO., ALI-IS V. See Allis v. Ins. Co. 
 INS. CO. v. BAXLET, 13 'Wall. 681. 
 
 Equity ; cannot try title, a 
 
 a 16 Wall. 435, U. S. v. Huckabce. 
 a 98 U. S. 83, Ivinson v. Hutton. 
 
 INS. CO. V. BARINGS, 20 WaU. 163. 
 
 Insurance ; insurable interest, a \ a'. 
 
 1 U. S. 538, Hooper v Robinson 
 
 INS. CO. v. BARTON, 13 'Wall. 603. 
 
 " Supreme Court ; granting new i a 102 U. S. 120, R. E. Co. v. Heck, 
 trials not reviewable, a I 
 
 INS. CO 
 INS. CO. v. 
 
 Insurance 
 
 BROOKXTN V. See Brooklyn v. Ins. Co. 
 r. CHASE, 5 WaU. 509. 
 
 insurable interest, a | a 14 Wall. 509, Ins. Co. v Hamilton 
 
 INS. CO. V. COI.T, 80 "Wall. 567. 
 
 Insurance ; when concluded, a | a 94 U. S. 627, Eames v. Ins. Co. 
 
 INS. CO. V. COMSTOCK, 16 Wall. 858 
 
 Supreme Court; bankruptcy a 
 cases; supervisory jurisdiction, a a 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandamus. & 6 
 
 Writ of error on order remanding c 
 a cause to State court, c 
 
 Facts only re-examined according a 
 to the rules of the common law. d d 
 
 a 
 
 19 Wall. 284. Coit v. Robinson. 
 23 Wall. 160, Sticlcney v. Wilt. 
 23 Wall. 508, R. R. Co. v Wiswall 
 94 U. S. 5, Hoadley u. S a n 
 
 Francisco. 
 94 U. S. 323, Hill v. Tliompson. 
 94 U. S. 657, Crim v. Handley. 
 98 U. S. 369, Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. 
 
144 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 rNS. CO., COPBLIN V. See Copelia v. 
 EXS. CO. V. DAVIS, 95 U. S. 485. 
 
 Iiisiiiance ; payment of premi- 
 um, a 
 
 INS. CO., DEtMAS V. SeeDelmasi). 
 INS. CO. V. DUNHAM, 11 Wall. 89. 
 
 Admiralty jm-iscUctioii ; marine 
 contracts and torts, a 
 
 INS. CO. V. DUNN, 19 WaU. 814. 
 
 Removals ; act of 1867. a 
 Power of the State court to pro- 
 ceed aftet filing of bond, b 
 
 INS. CO. V. FOI.SOM, 18 WaU. 837. 
 
 Supreme Court ; review of find- 
 lu": of facts, a 
 
 Error; objections must first be 
 taken in tlie court below, b 
 
 INS. CO. V. LYMAN, 15 Wall. 670. 
 
 Insurance; representations; con- 
 cealment, a 
 
 INS. CO. V. MAHONE, 31 WaU. 158 
 
 Insurance ; parol evidence, a \ 
 INS. CO., MAUBAN t. ' See Mauran v. 
 INS. CO. V. MOKDECAI, 81 H. 199. 
 
 Supreme Court; return of writ 
 of error and appeals, a 
 
 INS. CO. V. MORSE, 80 Wall. 445. 
 
 U. B. courts ; parties cannot oust 
 the jurisdiction by agreement, a \ 
 INS. CO. T. MOWKT, 96 U. S. 544. 
 
 Insurance; agents; declarations 
 of. a 
 
 Ins. Co. 
 
 I a 96 U. S. 578, Ins. Co. v. Eggleston 
 
 Ins. Co. 
 
 a 13 "Wall. 242, ex parte McNeil. 
 a 18 Wall. 304, Atkins v. Disinte- 
 grating Co. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 454, Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 a 21 Wall. 43, Vannevar v. Bry- 
 ant. 
 a 99 U. S. 147, R.R. o.McKinley. 
 a 100 U. S. 317, Virginia v. Rives. 
 a 100 TJ. S. 475, Removal Cases. 
 ,6 101 U. S. 136, R. R. Co. v. Miss. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 69, Cooper v. Oiiio- 
 
 hundro. 
 a 19 Wall. 72, Crews v. Brewer. 
 6 20 Wall. 419, Mays v. Fritton. 
 a 98 U. S. 443, The Abbotsford. 
 alOOU. S. 32, R.R.Co.«.Fralofif 
 
 I a 18 Wall. 253, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 014, Ins. Co. v. Baker. 
 Ins. Oo. 
 
 a 21 H. 394, Porter v. Foley. 
 a 3 Wall. 50, Castro v. U. S. 
 a 6 Wall. 496, Washington v. 
 
 Dennison. 
 a 8 Wall. 309, The Lucy. 
 
 a 94 U. 8. 537, Doyle v. Ins. Co. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 578, Ins. Co. v. Eggleston 
 
 INS. CO., NATIONAL BANK v. See National Bank „. Ins. Oo. 
 INS. CO. V. NEWTON, 88 WaU. 38. 
 
 effectrSisri'is."'';"'^ p"°'^ ' r '•' ^- «• 3^0' i"f i;°- "• ««^''"- 
 
 I both am. 
 
 INS. CO. V. NORTON, 96 U. S. 884. 
 
 Insurance; forfeiture; waiver, a \ a 
 
 INS. CO. V. PECHNER, 95 U. S. 183. 
 
 3 U. S. 577, Ins. Co. v. Eggleston 
 
 Removals, a 
 
 a 9o U. S. 186, Amory v. Amorv. 
 a 96 U. S. 202, Gold Co. v. Keyes. 
 a 99 U. S. 546, Yulee v. Vose. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 145 
 
 INS. CO., KEEB V. See Reed v. Ins. Co. 
 
 INS. CO., RHTNELANDEK v. See Rhiaelander v. Ins. Co. 
 
 INS. CO. V. BITCBCIE, 5 Wall. 541. 
 
 Eepealiugaots; pendingsuits. a 
 
 U. S. courts; revemie oases. 6 
 Suits to recover back taxes, c 
 
 a 7 Wall. 514, ex parte McCanlle. 
 6 9 Wall. 565, IIornMial v. Coll'r. 
 c 9 Wall. 573, Assessor v. Osborn. 
 a 98 U. S. 401, E. R. Co. v. Gi-aut. 
 
 INS. CO. T. SEA, 21 Wall. 160 
 
 Trial without jury; finding of I a 94 U. S. 79S, Melemly v. Rice, 
 facts, a I o 98 U. S. 443, The Abbotsford. 
 
 INS. CO., STOCKBAIE T. See Stookdale v. Ins. Co. 
 
 INS. CO. V. TREASUBER, 11 WaU. 208, 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to I a 13 Wall. 263, Klinger v. Mo. 
 
 State court ; Federal question, a | a 15 Wall. 642, Bank v. Rochester. 
 
 INS. CO. v. TWEED, 7 Wall. 50. 
 
 Supreme Court; review of cases a 9 Wall. 128, Norris r. Jackson, 
 
 tried by the court without a jury; a 9 Wall. 431, Flanders v. Tweed, 
 
 act of 1865. a a 18 Wall. 252, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 
 Insurance; loss; "proximate 6 19 Wall, 542, Ins. Co. k. Seaver. 
 
 cause." 6 6 95 U. S. 131, Ins. Co. v. Boon. 
 
 INS. CO. V. WEBSTER, 6 WaU. 121. 
 
 Insurance ; when contract com- | a 95 U. S. 388, Ins. Co. v. Higgin- 
 plete. a I botham. 
 
 INS. CO. V. WEIDE, 9 -WaU. 677. 
 
 Evidence; copies; entries, a I a 14 Wall. 381, Ins. Co. v. Weides. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 541f Chaffee v. U. S. 
 
 INS. CO. T. WILKINSON, 13 Wall. 230. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 155, Ins. Co. «. Mahone. 
 a 94 U. S. 614, Ins. Co. v. Baker. 
 6 94 U. S. 630, Eames v. Ins. Co. 
 c 98 U. S. 89, Snell v. Ins. Co. 
 
 Insurance ; answers ; parol evi- 
 dence, a 
 
 When company concluded by ac- 
 tion of its agent, b 
 
 Equity ; mistakes, c 
 
 INS. CO. V. TOTTNG, 33 WaU. 105. 
 
 Insurance ; payment premium, a \ a 102 U. S. 112, Giddings ». Ins. Co. 
 
 INTERMTNGLED COTTON CASES, 99 P. S. 651, 
 
 Captured and abandoned prop- I a 99 U. S. 270, U. S. e. Pugh. 
 erty act. a I 
 
 INTTNCretE, THE. See L,' Invincible. 
 
 IOWA, BABTEMETER v. See Bartemeyer u. Iowa. 
 
 IOWA, CHICAGO RAILWAY v. See Chicago Railway v. Iowa. 
 
 lOW^A, MISSOURI V, See Missouri v. Iowa. 
 
 IOWA CITT, BENBOW v. See Benbow v. Iowa City. 
 
 IOWA CITT, CLARK v. See Clark «. Iowa City. 
 
 IOWA CITT, HAVEMETER v. See Hayemeyer e. Iowa City. 
 
 IRRESISTIBLE, THE, 7 Wi. 661. 
 
 Statutes; effect of repeal on pend- 1 a 9 WaU. 575, Assessor p. Osborn. 
 ing cases, a I 
 
 10 
 
146 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 IRVINE V. IRVINE, 9 Wall. 617. 
 
 Estoppel; acquiescence; si- 
 lence, a 
 
 IRVINE T. liOWRY, 14 F. 898. 
 
 Circuit Courts U. S.; citizen- 
 ship, a 
 
 IKVINE V. MABSHALI., 80 H. 658. 
 
 Povverof Congress in disposing of 
 public lands; cannot be obstructed 
 by State legislation, a 
 
 IRVINE V. SIMS, 3 DaU. 486. 
 
 Indians; right to land, a 
 Ejectment; legal title. 6 
 Title by confirmation, c 
 
 IRWIN, DADE V. See Dade v. Irwin. 
 
 IRWIN, TRACY v. See Tracy i>. Irwin. 
 
 ISEtIN, CI.ABK V. See Clark v. Iselin. 
 
 ISHAM, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Isham. 
 
 ISLAND CITY, THE, 1 Bl. 187. 
 
 Salvage, a 
 
 IVES T. MERCHANTS' BANK, 18 H. 
 
 Admiralty; stipulators, a | 
 
 JACKSON, EX PARTE, 96 U. S. 787 
 Supreme Court ; habeas corpus, a | 
 
 JACKSON V. ASHTON, 8 P. 148. 
 
 TJ. S. courts; citizenship, a 
 Judgments and verdicts; power 
 of court over. 6 
 
 JACKSON -V. ASHTON, 10 P. 480. 
 
 Amendments; .sec. 32 of judiciary I 
 act. a 
 
 JACKSON V. ASHTON, 11 P. 848. 
 
 Equity; rescission, a \ 
 
 JACKSON, CARVER v. , See Carver v. 
 JACKSON v. CHEW, 18 Wi. 153. 
 
 State decisions ; when U. S. courts 
 will follow; section 34 of judiciary 
 act. a 
 
 Contracts governed by law of 
 place of performance. 6 
 
 a 102 TT. S. 312, Sims v. Everhardt. 
 
 a 2 H. 13, McNutt v. Bland. 
 a 3 H. 577, Bounafee v. Williams. 
 a 13 Wall. 67, Eice v. Hou.ston. 
 a 18 Wall. 575, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 104, Gibson v. Chouteau. 
 
 I a 9 P. 716, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 I 6 12 P. 427. Strother v. Lucas, 
 c 9 H. 44.!, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 475, The Comanche. 
 
 163. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 617, The Wanata. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 343, ex parte Virginia. 
 
 a 10 P. 4S0, Jackson v. Ashton. 
 6 G H. 36, Bank U.S. v. Moss. 
 a 19 H. 402, Dred Scott v. Sandford 
 
 a 91 U. S. 656, Phillips Coast Co. ». 
 Seymour. 
 
 a 8 H. 149, Veazie v. Williams. 
 Jackson. 
 
 1 P. 570, Waring v. Jackson. 
 P. 151, Henderson v. Griffin. 
 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 
 11 P. 2, Marlatt v. Silk. 
 
 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 
 3 H. 471, Lane v. Vick. 
 
 4 H. 370, Foxcroft v. Mallett. 
 11 H. 317, Van Rensselaer v. 
 
 Kearney. 
 a 18 H. 497, Beauregard v. N. Orl. 
 a 24 H. 433, Suydam U.Williamson 
 a 102 U. S. 655, Barrett ». Holmes. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 147 
 
 JACKSON V. ClABK, 1 P. 628. 
 
 Land laws ; survey under act of 
 March 3, 1S07, on wan-ant pre- 
 yiously located, a 
 
 Death of grantee; rights of heirs. 6 
 
 JACKSON, KEU.T V. See KeUy v. Jackson. 
 JACKSON V. I.AMPHIRE, 3 P. 889. 
 
 Grants; construction, a 
 
 a 6 P. 672, Lindsey v. Miller. 
 6 12 P. 294, Galloway z. Finley. 
 a 7 H. 266, McArthur ». Dun. 
 
 c 13 Wall. 
 
 Land laws. 6 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; remedy; recording acts, c 
 
 Retrospective legislation, d 
 
 Writ of error to State court ; 
 Supreme Court has no authority to 
 declare a State law void because in 
 violation of the State Constitu- 
 tion, e 
 
 Statutes of limitation, f 
 
 JACKSON V. UIDELIN6, 21 Wall. 616. 
 
 Trnstee ; obligations to cestui I a 99 U 
 que trust, a | a 99 tJ, 
 
 JACKSON T. THE MAGN01.IA, 86 H. 298. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction; collision 
 within the body of a county ; ebb 
 and flow of the tide, a 
 
 Attachment of vessel by State 
 court. 6 
 
 a 11 P. 536, Charles River Bridge 
 V. Warren Bridge. 
 6 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas, 
 c 2 H. 611, MoCracken v Hay ward 
 c 6 H. 318, Bank v. Sharp. 
 d 10 H. 532, East Hartford w. Hart- 
 ford Bridge. 
 e 20 H. 87, Withers v. Buckley. 
 71, Curtis V. Whitney. 
 
 /95 U. S. 633, Terry v. Anderson. 
 
 S. 436, Parsons ». Jactoon. 
 S. 514, Jackson ». Lndeling 
 
 a 1 Bl. 580, Propeller Commerce. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 567, The Hine & Trevor 
 
 a 7 Wall. 640, The Belfast. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 20, The Eagle. 
 
 6 15 Wall. 384, Pennywit v. Eaton 
 
 JACKSON, NOBBIS T. See Norrls v. Jackson. 
 
 JACKSON, BAILKOAB CO. v. See Railroad Co. -a. Jackson. 
 
 JACKSON, "WXLCOX -V. See Wilcox v. Jackson. 
 
 JACKSON, WINCHESTEB. t. See ■Winchester o. Jackson. 
 
 JAMES, DAXT v. See Daly v. James. 
 
 JAMES, KAILKOAJD CO. t. See Railroad Co. v. James. 
 
 JAMES GBAI, THE, v. THE JOHN PBAZEK, 21 H. 184. 
 
 a 24 H. 123, Sturgis ». Boyer. 
 b 24 H. 213, S. S. Co. v. S. S. Co. 
 c 2 Wall. 556, The Morning Light 
 d 17 Wall. 568, R. R. Co. w. Fuller. 
 a 94 U. S. 497, The Margaret. 
 
 Collision ; tugs, a 
 
 Inevitable accident, h 
 
 When loss must rest where it 
 falls, c 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce ; police power, d 
 
 JAMISON, TOWNSEND v. See Townsend v. Jamison. 
 JANNEY v. COI/TJMBIAN INS. CO., 10 WU. 418. 
 
 Marine ins.; seaworthiness, a | a 22 H. 116, Ins. Co. v. Mordecai. 
 JANNEX, litrPTON V. See Lupton v. Janney. 
 JANSEN, TAXBOT v. See Talbot.i). Jansen. 
 JANTJABY, JOHNSON CO. v. See Johnson Co. v. January. 
 JANUABY, rr. S. V. See IT. S. v. January. 
 JABVIS, STEATTON v. See Stration v. Jarvis. 
 JASPEB CO., ANTHONY v. See Anthony v. Jasper Co. 
 JATJDON, DUNCAN t. See Duncan i). Jaudon. 
 
148 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIOSS. 
 
 JXICKER V. MONTGOMEBT, 13 H. 498. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction; prize; 
 
 condemnation, probable cause of 
 
 seizure, a 
 Violation of blockade. 6 
 Commercial intercourse, c 
 War ; military occupation, d 
 War: suspends right to sue. e 
 Informations; who may join in. y 
 
 a 18 H. Ill, Jecker w. Montgomery. 
 b 3 Wall. 554, The Bermuda. 
 a 5 Wall. 69, U. S. v. Weed, 
 c 5 Wall. 405, The Wra. Bagaley. 
 c 6 Wall. 535, Hanger !). Abbott. 
 d 9 Wall. 133, The Grapeshot. 
 e 11 Wall. 250, Levy v. Stewart. 
 /16 Wall. 431, U. S. v. Huckabee. 
 
 JEFFERSON, THE STEAMBOAT. See Thomas Jefferson, The. 
 JEFFERSON BRANCH BANK v. SKELI.T, 1 Bl. 443. 
 
 Constitution ; corporations ; obli- 
 gation of contracts; exemption 
 from taxation, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court ; Federal question. 6 
 
 When U. S. courts must follow 
 the decisions of the State courts, c 
 
 Jurisdiction of U. S. courts where 
 a State is interested in the suit; 
 court will not look beyond the rec- 
 ord, d 
 
 a 
 
 1 
 
 a 
 
 2 
 
 b 
 
 1 
 
 c 
 
 1 
 
 c 
 
 8 
 
 a 
 
 13 
 
 h 
 
 14 
 
 a 
 
 15 
 
 d 
 
 16 
 
 a 
 
 16 
 
 a 
 
 20 
 
 a 
 
 21 
 
 a 
 
 22 
 
 c 
 
 97 
 
 clOl 
 
 Bl. 474, Branch Bank v. Ohio. 
 
 Bl. 544, Wright v. Sill. 
 
 Wall. 145, Bridge Proprietors 
 V. Hoboken. 
 
 Wall. 393, Meyer B.Muscatine 
 
 Wall. 582, Butz v. Muscatine. 
 
 Wall. 376, Salt Co. v. E. Sagi- 
 naw. 
 
 Wall. 668, Delmas v. Ins. Co. 
 
 Wall. 458, Tomlinson v. Jes- 
 sup. 
 
 Wall. 220, Davis v. Gray. 
 
 Wall. 249, Humphrey ». Pe- 
 gues. 
 
 Wall. 61, K. R. V. Magulre. 
 
 Wall. 498, Erie E.R. v. Penn. 
 
 Wall. 575, Tucker«.Fergusoii 
 
 U. S. 709, K. R. V. Gaines. 
 
 U. S. 321, University ». Peo- 
 ple. 
 
 U. S. 794, Wright v. Nagle. 
 
 JEFFEBSONVILI.E, BISSEIil. v. See Bissell v. JeffersonTille. 
 JEFFRIES V. MFE INS. CO., 88 WaU. 47. 
 
 Insurance ; false statements, a | a 91 U. S. 512, Ins. Co. v. Prance. 
 
 JENKINS V. BANNING, 83 H. 445. 
 
 Error; matters of discretion, a | a 11 Wall. 676, Cook v. Burnley. 
 JENKINS, GAJRKETT v. See Garrett v. Jenkins. 
 
 JENKINS, NICHOLSON PAVE. CO. v. See Nicholson 
 JENKINS V. PYE, 18 P. 841. 
 
 Equity ; lapse of time, a 
 
 Pave. Co. V. Jenkins. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 211, Godden v. Kimraell. 
 
 JENNINGS T. CAKSON, 4 Cr. 80. 
 
 Admiralty; proceedings in rem. a 
 Jurisdiction of District Courts. 6 
 Prize ; on appeal to Circuit Ct.; 
 property follows the cause, c 
 
 Keeper of property seized; lia- 
 bility for negligence, d 
 
 a 20 H. 600, 
 b 3 Wall. 612, 
 c 5 Wall. 412, 
 d 17 Wall. 93, 
 a 23 Wall. 465, 
 
 Taylor v. Carryl. 
 The Admiral. 
 The Wm. Bagaley. 
 Averill v. Smith. 
 The Rio Grande. 
 
 JENKS, PATTERSON T. See Patterson v. Jenks. 
 JENNESS, PECK v. See Peck v. Jenness. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPKEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 149 
 
 JENOTNGS V. BBIG PBKSEVERAUCE, 3 Dall. 337. 
 
 Appeals to Supreme Court ; sec. 
 19 judiciary act. a 
 Review of facts. 6 
 
 a 1 Cr. 318, U. S. «. Hooe. 
 
 6 IS Wall. 249, Iiis. Co. «. Polsom. 
 
 JENTflSON, HOLMES v. See Holmes v. Jennison. 
 JENNISON V. KIBK, 98 U. S. 453. 
 
 Mining laws ; act of 1866. a ( a 101 IT. S. 276, Broder v. Water Co 
 
 JENNISONS V. lEONABD, 81 WaU. 303. 
 
 Trial without jury; act of 1865. a | a 98 U. S. 443, The Abbotsford. 
 
 JEROME T. McCAJKTEB, 31 WaU. 17. 
 
 Supersedeas, a 
 
 a 93 U. S . 302, Martin ».Po wder Co. 
 a 100 U.S. 5, ex parte French. 
 a 102 U.S. 371, Draper v. Davis. 
 
 JEROME T. McCASTER, 94 U. S. 734. 
 
 Bankruptcy; assignee takes prop- 
 erty subject to equities, a 
 
 a 95 U. S. 766, Yeatman v. Sav- 
 ings Inst. 
 a 100 U. S. 739, Stewart v. Piatt. 
 
 JESSUP, TOMLINSON v. See Tomlinson v. Jessup. 
 
 JOHN ERAZEK, THE, JAMES GRAY, THE v. See James Gray, The, 
 John Frazer. 
 
 JOHN JAY, TELE, BOGART v. See Bogart v. The John Jay. 
 
 JOHNSON, D'WOLF v. See D'Wolf v. Johnson. 
 
 JOHNSON V. HARMON, 94 IT. S. 371. 
 
 Equity ; feigned issues ; bill of | a 101 U. S. 250, Watt v. Starke, 
 exceptions does not lie. a \ 
 
 JOHNSON V. McINTOSH, 8 Wh. 543. 
 
 Indians ; right to the land they 
 occupy, a 
 
 Effect of a cession on the prop- 
 erty of the inhabitants. 6 
 
 Powers of tlie Crown before the 
 Revolution over boundaries, c 
 
 As to grants, d 
 
 Power of government over the 
 Indians, e 
 
 Conquest ; when it becomes com- 
 plete, f 
 
 05 6 P. 536, Worcester v. Georgia, 
 a 9 P. 725, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 a 10 P. 303, U. S. V. Fernandez. 
 
 6 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas, 
 c 11 P. 738, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 a 15 P. 80, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 a 16 P. 406, Martin v. Waddell. 
 a 23 H. 46), Doe v. Wilson. 
 e 11 Wall. 619, Cherokee Tobacco. 
 /16 Wall. 434, U. S. v. Huckabee. 
 a 17 Wall. 243, Holden v. Joy. 
 a 19 Wall. 593, U. S. v. Cook. 
 a 95 U. S. 525, Beecher v. Weth- 
 
 ersby. 
 JOHNSON, MISSISSIPPI v. See Mississippi v. Johnson. 
 
 JOHNSON, NATIONS v. See Nations v. Johnson. 
 
 JOHNSON v. PANNEL, 8 Wh. 307. 
 
 Land laws ; distances on the Ohio I a 11 Wh. 215, Luitepagew. Fowler. 
 River ; how measured, a | 
 
 JOHNSON, PAKCEIiS v. See Pareels v. Johnson. 
 JOHNSON, SESSIONS v. See Sessions i). Johnson. 
 
150 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 JOHNSON v. TOWSIEY, 13 WaU. SO. 
 
 Land titles ; patent ; when chan- 
 cery will enforce equities against 
 patent, a 
 
 Public lands ; sales of. 6 
 
 When decision of land oflScers 
 conclusive, c 
 
 Pre-emption, d 
 
 13 Wall. 
 
 13 Wall. 
 
 19 Wall. 
 19 WaU. 
 
 93 U. 
 96 U. 
 
 100 U. 
 
 101 U. 
 
 101 U. 
 
 102 U. S. 
 
 102, Gibson v. Chou- 
 teau. 
 
 497, Carpenters Mont- 
 gomery. 
 
 196, Eldred v. Sexton. 
 
 653, Warren v. Van 
 Brunt. 
 
 171, French v. Fyan. 
 
 516, Atherton «j Fowler 
 
 117, Iiansdale v. Dan- 
 iels. 
 
 475, Marquez w.Frisbie. 
 
 519, Vance v. Burbank. 
 
 396, U. S. V. Schui-z. 
 
 JOECNSON, IT. S. T. SeeU. S. v. Johnsoa. 
 JOHNSON CO. V. JANITAKT, 94 U. S. 803. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in I a 97 U. S. 104, Warren Co. u Marcy 
 aid of railroads ; conditions; recit- 
 als ; estoppel ; bona-fide holders, a \ 
 
 JOHNSON CO., KIGGS v. See Kiggs i). Johnson Co. 
 JOHNSON CO. V. THAYER, 94 U. S. 631. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads ; conditions ; recit- 
 als ; bona-fide holders, a 
 
 a 98 U. S. 102, Daviess Co. v. Hui- 
 
 dekoper. 
 a 99 U. S. 698, Block ». Comra'rs. 
 
 JOHNSTON, CASS CO. V. See Oass Co. v. Johnston. 
 JOHNSTON, JONES v. See Jones v. Johnston. 
 JOHNSTON V. JONES, 1 Bl. 830. 
 
 jury; excep- 
 h 
 
 Instructions t o 
 tions. a 
 Cross-examination. 
 
 JOUEPB, STEAMSHIP CO. 
 
 JOLIT, UNION BANK v. See Union Bank v. Jolly. 
 
 JONES, ADAMS V. See Adams u. Jones. 
 
 JONES V. ANDREWS, 10 WaU. 331. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 654, Eogers v. The Mai> 
 
 slial. 
 a 2 Wall. 338, Harvey v. Tyler. 
 6 17 Wall. 542, Rea v. Missouri. 
 6 19 Wall. 463, Klein v. Bussell. 
 a 93 U. S. 295, R. R. v. Horst. 
 
 See Steamship Co. i). Joliffe. 
 
 Parties in equity, a 
 Ancillary suit, h 
 U. S. courts; suits between citi- 
 zens of dififerent States; parties, c 
 
 a 14 Wall. 81, Christmas v. Russell 
 h 16 Wall. 219, Davis u. Gray, 
 c 93 U. S. 205, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 
 See Bank of Metropolis v. Jones. 
 
 JONES, BANIC OF METROPOLIS v. 
 JONES, DERMOTT v. See Derraott v. Jones. 
 JONES V. DERMOTT, 3 WaU. 1. 
 
 Building contracts ; liability of I a 21 Wall. 263, R. R. Co. v. Smith, 
 contractor, a \ 
 
 JONES, HICKMAN v. See Hickman d. Jones. 
 JONES, HOUGHTON v. See Houghton d. Jones. 
 JONES, HURLEY v. See Hurley v. Jones. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 151 
 
 JONES V. GBEEN, 1 "WaU. 330. 
 
 Creditor's bill; judgment and | a 2 Wall. 195, Chittenden i\ Brew- 
 execution, a I ster. 
 
 JONES V. GUARANTY CO., 101 U. S. 6»8. 
 
 Partnership ; antliority of part- | a 102 U. S. 569, George ». Tate, 
 ner to bind tlie firm, a \ 
 
 JONES T. JOHNSTON, 18 H. 157. 
 
 Alluvion, a I a 2 Bl. 218, Johnston v. Jones. 
 
 I a 2 Wall. 67, Banks v. Ogden. 
 
 JONES, JOHNSTON v. See Jolinston ■o. Jones. 
 JONES, liA ROCHE T. See La Eoclie v. Jones. 
 JONES V. McMASTEBS, 30 H. 8. 
 
 Texas land titles, a 
 U. S. courts ; law and equity 
 must be l<ept separate. 6 
 
 JONES T. MOREHEAD, 1 Wall. 155 
 
 Patent law; infringement; dam- 
 ages ; profits, a 
 
 Patents for manufactures; "in- 
 vention." 6 
 
 a 98 U. S. 494, Airhart v. Massieii. 
 b 99 U. S. 381, Van JCorden v. 
 Morton. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 650, Mowry v. Whitney. 
 ft 23 Wall. 563, Collar Co. h. Van 
 
 Dusen. 
 6 94 U. S. 198, Dunbar v. Myers. 
 
 JONES V. SHORE, 1 'WTi. 463. 
 
 Penalties; forfeitures under the 
 embargo act; who entitled to on 
 deatli of collector making the seiz- 
 ure, a 
 
 When right accrues. 6 
 
 a 4 Wh. 73, Van ISTp.^b. Buel. 
 a 8 Wh. 312, Buel v. Van Ness. 
 a 10 Wh. 246, U. S. u. Morris. 
 6 10 H. 132. Hoyt ». U. S. 
 a 7 Wall. 460, Confiscation Cases. 
 
 JONES, POST V. See Post v. Jones. 
 
 JONES, RAHiROAD CO. v. See Eailroad Co. v. Jones. 
 
 JONES, SCOTT V. See Scott v. Jones. 
 
 JONES V. SOUIiARD, 34 H. 63. 
 
 Missouri land titles; boundaries I a 10 Wall. 115, Schools v. Risley 
 of St. Louis, a 6 23 Wall. 64, St. Clair v. Lovin 
 
 Boundaries ; rivers. 6 j ston. 
 
 JONES, U. S. V. See U. S. a. Jones. 
 
 JONES V. V. S., 18 WaU. 663. 
 
 U. S.; laches not imputable to. a\a 95 U. S. 318, Hart v. U. S. 
 
 JONES V. VAN ZANDT, 5 H. 324. 
 
 Certificates of division, a | a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Chicago. 
 
 JONES, WATSON V. See Watson v. Jones. 
 JOBDON, AGAGAM CO. v. See Agasam Oo. v. Jordon. 
 JOSEPH, THE, 8 Cr. 451, 
 
 Prize ; what is a valid captm-e. a 
 
 Trading with enemy in time of 
 war. 6. 
 
 JOUBDAN V. BARRETT, 4 H. 169. 
 
 Public land.s; surveys, a 
 Right to back lands on Missis- 
 sippi Kiver ; private survey. 6 
 
 a 8 Cr. 460, The Grotius. 
 6 18 H. Ill, Jecker v. Montgom- 
 ery. 
 
 a 4 H. 44.5. JIaclvav v. Dillon. 
 b 8 11. 330, Bisselfi). Penrose. 
 
152 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 I a Wail. 62.% Spain v. Hamilton. 
 See Lathrop v. Judson. 
 
 JXJDSON v. CORCORAN, 17 H. 618. 
 
 Assignment.'!, a 
 
 JCDSON, liATHROP v 
 JULIA, THE, 8 Cr. 181. 
 
 Priz(! ; enemy's license ; capture I a 8 Ci'. 219, Tiie Aurora, 
 of vessel using, a I a 7 Wall. 558, Coppell v. Hall. 
 
 JUSTICE, r. S. V. See U. S. v. Justice. 
 JUSTICES V. MURRAY, 9 TTaU. 274. - 
 
 U. S. courts; removal of cause a 10 Wall. 25, McKee «. Rains, 
 after verdict, a a 19 Wall. 576, Stevenson u. Wil- 
 
 liams. 
 KAHN, STEWART v. See Stewart v. Kahn. 
 KAINE, EX PARTE, 14 H. 103. 
 
 Supreme Court; appellate juris- 
 
 diction ; habeas corpus, a 
 
 a 1 Wall. 253, ex parte Vallandi- 
 
 gbam. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 99, ea; joar/e Yerger. 
 a 12 Wall. 402, Bartli v. Clise. 
 a 18 Wall. 166, ex parte Lange. 
 a 100 U. S. 341, ex parte Virginia. 
 a 100 U. S. 402, ear parte ClarUe. 
 
 KAXORAIKLA, THE, 10 Wall. 804. 
 
 Admiralty ; lien of material-men 
 for supplies in foreign ports, a 
 KANE, BARTIETT v. See Bartlett v. Kane 
 KAIfE V. PAUI-, 14 P. 33. 
 
 District of Columbia; foreign 
 administrators, a 
 Settlement of accounts. 6 
 
 KANOUSB V. MARTIN, 14 H. 83. 
 
 Removals, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; amendments af- 
 ter writ of error. 6 
 
 KANOUSE T. MARTIN, 16 H. 887. 
 
 Supreme Court; amount in con- 
 troversy; remittitur, a 
 Removals. 6 
 
 KAN. PAC. R. R. CO., MIS. KAN. & PAC. R. K. CO 
 
 Pac. E. E. Co. V. Kan. Pac. E. E. Co. 
 KANSAS INDIANS, THE, 5 WaU. 7S1. 
 
 Indian lands ; State taxation. a\a 5 Wall. 769, NewTorlcIndiaiis, 
 
 I a 17 Wall. 247, Holden », Joy. 
 KAUTTMAN, BATESVIIX,E INST. v. See BatesviUe Inst. v. Kauffman. 
 KAUFEMAN, URE v. See Ure v. Kauffman. 
 KBACH, TARVER v. See Tarver v. Keach. 
 KEARNEY, EX PARTE, 7 Wh. 39. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 335, The Pafapsco. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 669, The Emily Souder: 
 
 a 15 P. 4. Vaughan v. Nortluip. - 
 6 5 H. 2G0, Taylor v. Benham, 
 a 9 Wall. 401, JSToouan ». Biadley. 
 
 a 15 H. 198, Kanouso v. Martin. 
 a 19 Wall. 224, Ins. Co. v. Dunn. 
 6 21 Wall. 552, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 695, Thompson?) Butler 
 6 102 U. 8. 136, R. R. Co. v. Miss. 
 
 See Mis. Kan. * 
 
 H.ibeas corpus ; power of Su- 
 preme Court, a 
 
 Fine for contempt; whether a 
 writ of error lies ; criminal jurisdic- 
 tion. 5 
 
 a 3 P. 194, ex. parte Watkins. 
 a 7 P. 568, ex parte Watliins. 
 a 5H. 188, ea; pa?-ie Metzgi-r. 
 6 9 n. 572, Forsyth v. U. S. 
 6 20 Wall. 392, N. Orl. v. S. S. Co. 
 a 93 U. S. 23, ex parte Parks, 
 a 100 U. S. 23, ex parte Reed. 
 h 102 U. S. 122, Hayes v. Fischet-. 
 
. MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 153 
 
 KEARNEY t. CASE, 13 WaU, 876. 
 
 Trial without jury; tiiiding of 
 facts, a 
 
 KEAKNET T. TATIOK, 15 H. 615. 
 
 Eetrospective laws, a 
 
 a 13 Willi. 2, Bethell u Mathews 
 a 19 Wall. 83, Morgan v. Guy. 
 a 81 U. S. 614. Gilmaii v, Tel. Co. 
 a 93 U. S. 81, Evan u. Cai-fer. 
 a 100 U. S. 213, Phillips v. Moore. 
 
 a S Wall. 603, Drehmaii v. Stifle. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 149, Eanaell v. Kreiger. 
 KEARNEY, VAN KENSAXEAK v. ' See Tan Eensalear v. Kearney. 
 KEART V. FARMERS AND MERCHANTS' BANK, 16 P. 89. 
 
 a 2 H. 242, Dromgoole v. Bank, 
 a 2 H. 611, McCrackenu Hay ward 
 a 5 H. 62, Macafee v. Doremus. 
 & 6 H. 36. Bank v. Moss. 
 c 7 H. 714, Townsentl v. Jemison. 
 d 18 H. 517, Watson v. Tarpley. 
 
 U. S. courts ; negotiable paper ; 
 rule of decision, a 
 
 Suits by assignees ; 11th section 
 of judiciary act. b 
 
 When State decisions binding on 
 U. S. courts, c 
 
 Enforcement of State laws, d 
 
 KEARZEY, EDWARDS v. See Edwards v. Kearzey. 
 KEEECLER, TJ. S. v. See U. S. v. Keehler. 
 KEELEY V. SANDERS, 99 U. S. 441. 
 
 Tax sales ; direct tax in insurrec- I a 99 TJ. S. 497, Sherry v. McKinley 
 tionary States, a j 
 
 KEENAN, MUI-BLALIi v. See Mulhall v. Keenan. 
 KEENE, BRO'\YN v. See Brown v. Keene. 
 
 BLEENE T. Mcdonough, s p. 310. 
 
 Grants; presumption .as to the I a 12 P. 427, Strother «. Lucas, 
 authority of officer to make it. a \ 
 
 KEENE T. WARREN, 13 P. 439. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, o | a 20 H. 130, McMicken ». Perin. 
 
 KEENE V. W^HIXTAKER, 13 P. 469. 
 
 Supreme Court; the transcript, a | a 18 H. 109, Curtis v. Petitpain. 
 
 KEHR V. SMITH, 20 W^aU. 35. 
 
 Voluntary conveyances, u 
 KEIXOGG, BARNARD v. See Barnard v. Kellogg. 
 KEU^OGG, MHiWAUKEE R. R. t. See Milwaukee E. E. v. Kellogg. 
 KELtY V. CRAW^FORD, 6 W^all. 790. 
 
 Error; matters of discretion, a | a 91 U. S. 418, Society u. Faulkner. 
 
 KEI.I.Y V. JACKSON, 6 P. 638. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 485, Lloyd v. Fulton. 
 
 Evidence ; prima facie, a 
 
 a 14 P. 344, U. S. v. Wiggins. 
 
 KEIiliY, r. S. T. See U. S- ■o. Kelly. 
 KEtSEY -v. FORSYTH, 81 H. 87. 
 
 Supreme Court; how the ques- 
 tion of law must be decided in or- 
 der be reviewed, a 
 
 Judgment affirmed when there is 
 no bill of exception.a. 6 
 
 Jury trial ; waiver, c 
 KEIiSEY, HICKS v. See Hicks v. Kelsey. 
 
 a 21 H. 226, Campbell v. Boyreau. 
 b 1 Wall. 604, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 a 9 Wall. 429, Flanders v. Tweed. 
 c 12 Wall. 281, Kearney v. Case. 
 a 16 Wall. 347, Merrill v. Petty, 
 c 91 U. S. 614, Gilman v. Tel. Co. 
 
154 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 KEtSET V. HOBBT, 16 P. 269. 
 
 Equity ; master's reports, a 
 
 a 22 Wall. 248, French u. Hay. 
 
 KBIiSHA'W, GATIOBD v. See Gaylord i). Kelshaw. 
 KEMP, HTJDGINS v. See Hudgins i). Kemp. 
 KEMPB V. KENNEDY, 5 Or. 185. 
 
 Jiinsdictioii ; void and voidable 
 judgments, a 
 
 KENDAIL T. STOKES, 3 H. 98. 
 
 Public ofHcers ; when liable in 
 tort, a 
 Ministerial duties. 6 
 Mandamus, c 
 Interest, d 
 
 KENDAII, V. r. S., 18 P. 637. 
 
 Miindnmus against U. S. depart- 
 mental officers by courts of District 
 of Columbia ; ministerial duties, a 
 
 Supreme Coiu't; writs of error; 
 iiual judgments. 6 
 
 Jurisdiction, c 
 
 Extent of the judicial power un- 
 der the Constitution, d 
 
 Original jurisdiction of Supreme 
 Court, e 
 
 Remedy to reverse judgment re- 
 fusing mandamus, is by writ of 
 error, f 
 
 Circuit Courts ; jurisdiction, g 
 
 U. S. courts; mandamus, h 
 
 SuUi- 
 
 KEXDAM, T. WLNSOB, 81 H. 386. 
 
 Patent law; abandonment, a 
 
 a 10 AVh.192, McCormick v. 
 
 vant. 
 a 3 P. 194, ex parte Watkins. 
 a 6 H. 36, Bank u. Morse. 
 a 8 H. G05, Kennedy v. Bank. 
 a 2 Wall. 338, Harvey v. Tjier. 
 a 10 Wall. 310, Cooper ». Reynolds 
 
 a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 6 12H. 289, Tealu. Pelton. 
 c 24 H. 95, Kent'kv v. Dennison 
 d 16 Wall. 386, rns.'Co. v. Piaggio 
 6 102 U. S. .395, U. S. v. Schurz. 
 c 102 U. S. 675, Hartmanu.Green- 
 liow. 
 
 a 14 P. 513, Decatur v. Paulding. 
 
 6 14 P. 56], Holmes u. Jennison. 
 
 c 2 H. 335, Grignon -o. Astor. 
 
 a 6 H. 99, Brashear v. Jlason. 
 
 a 7 H. 122, Wilkes v. Dinsman. 
 
 d 8 H. 449, Sheldon v. Sill. 
 
 a 11 H. 287, Reeside v. Walker. 
 
 a 17 H. 229, U. S. ». Seaman. 
 
 a 17 H. 301, U. S. ». Gutln-ie. 
 
 a 22 H. 181, U. S. «. Addison; 
 
 a 24 H. 95, Ken t'ekyj). Dennison 
 
 e 1 Wall. 252, ex -parte Vallandl- 
 gliam. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 498, Miss. v. Johnson. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 198. Riggs v. Johnson. 
 
 / 6 Wall. 407, ex parte Do Groot. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 350, Gaines v. Thomp- 
 son. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 312, Secretary ». Mc- 
 Garrahan. 
 
 g 9 Wall. 575, Ass'r v. Osborn. 
 
 h 13 Wall. 249, Bath Co. v. Amy. 
 
 h 16 Wall. 270, Ins. Co. v. Com- 
 siock. 
 
 e 17 Wall. 609, U. S. u. Boutwell. 
 
 g 18 Wall. 577, Sew. Ma. Co. Case 
 
 a 19 Wall. 660, Heine v. Cora'rs. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 392, U. S. v. Schurz. 
 
 h 102 U. S. 675, HartmauB. Green- 
 how. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 60S, Agagam Co. v. 
 
 Jordou. 
 a 101 U. S. 484, Macli. Co.«. Keith 
 
MANUAL OF SUPKEMB CO PET DECISIONS. 
 
 155 
 
 KENBIG V. DBAJf, 97 TJ. S. 4S3. 
 
 Supreme Court; veversals for a 97 U. S. 456, Keith «. Clark, 
 want of parties ; bar of judgments; a 99 U. S. 382, Van Norden v. 
 dismissal without prejudice, a Morton. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 563, Goodman v. Nib- 
 laok. 
 
 KEjnSTAKD V. MOKGAIf, 98 V. S. 480. 
 
 Constitution ; " due process of | a 96 U. S. 105, Davidson v. New 
 law." a I Orleans. 
 
 KEIOfEDT, BANK v. See Bank v. Kennedy. 
 KEINTSEDT v. BKENT, 6 Cr. 187. 
 
 Supreme Court ; agreed case, a | a 16 P. 296, U. S. v. Eliason. 
 
 KElfNEDT, BBOWI*^ v. See Brown v. Kennedy. 
 KEIWEDT, BtJSHiraiLIi v. See Bnshnell v. Kennedy. 
 KETfNEDT v. GEOBGIA STATE BANK, 8 H. 610. 
 
 Amendments; by appellate 
 court, a 
 Certificiites of division. 6 
 
 KENNEDT v. GIBSON, 8 "Wall. 506. 
 
 National banks; insolvency; div- 
 idends by comptroller, a 
 
 Suit by receiver. 6 
 
 Assessment of stockholders ; or- 
 der by comptroller, c 
 
 a 17 H. 18, Udall v. Steams'p Oliio. 
 b 2 U1.484, Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 6 3 Wall. 255, Daniels v. R. R. Co. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 398, Bank ». Bank. 
 
 6 17 Wall. 21, Banks. Kennedy, 
 
 c 91 U. S. 59, Sanger v. Upton, 
 
 c 94 U. S. 677, Casey I!. Galli. 
 
 c 102 U. S. 426, U. S. v. Knox. 
 
 KENNEDY v. HUNT, 7 H. S93. 
 
 Supreme Conrt ; writs of error to I a 20 H. 522, Moreland v. Page. 
 State courts; Federal question. a\ 
 
 KENNEDY, KEMPE t. See Kempe v. Kennedy. 
 KENNEDY, MAXWELi v. See MaxweU v. Kennedy. 
 KENNEDY v. WTLSON, 8 WaU. 506. 
 
 National banks ; how claims I a 14 Wall. 401, Bank v. Bank, 
 against proved by creditors, a \ 
 
 KENNETT v. CHAMBEBS, 14 H. 44. 
 
 Illegal contracts, a | a 21 Wall. 480, Fox «. Gardner. 
 
 Political questions. 5 
 
 BtENNICOTX V. STJPEBVISOBS, 16 WaU. 458. 
 
 6 92 U. S. 132, Phillips ». Payne. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads ; legislative authority, a 
 
 Recitals ; conditions ; estoppel ; 
 boua-fide purchasers. 6 
 
 a 94 U. S. 262, South Ottowa v. 
 Perkins. 
 
 b 102 U. S. 291, Buchanans. Litch- 
 field. 
 
 KENOSHA T. lAMSON, 9 WaU. 477, 
 
 Coupons; limitations, a \ 
 
 KENTON, ALMONESTEB v. See Almonester v. Kenton, 
 KENTUCKY V. DENNISON, 84 H. 97. 
 
 U.S. courts; mandamus, a 
 
 Constitution; fugitive slave acts ; 
 duty of governor of a State to sur- 
 render. 6 
 
 What provisions of the Constitu- 
 tion are only declaratory, c 
 
 a 20 Wall. 586, Clark v. Iowa. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 197, Riggs v. Johnson. 
 6 16 Wall. 370, Taylor v. Taintor. 
 c 100 U. S. 347, ex parte Virginia, 
 c 100 U. S. 391, ex parte SiehoXd. 
 a 102 U. S. 675, Hartmaui;. Green- 
 how. 
 
156 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 KENTUCKY, NAT. BANK T. See Nat. Bank v. Kentucky. 
 KENTUCKY, PATTERSON V. See Patterson v. Kentucky. 
 KEOKUK, PACKET CO. v. See Packet Co. V. Keokuk. 
 KEOKUK, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Keokuk. 
 KBPLINGER v. DE YOUNG, 10 Wh. 358. 
 
 Patents; liability of purchasers 
 of article; ii]fringemeiit ; dam- 
 ages, a 
 
 KBBNOCHEN, SMZTH v. See Smith v. Kemochen. 
 KEBB, MIM.ee v. See Miller v. Kerr. 
 KEBB V. MOON, 9 "WTl. 565. 
 
 a 11 H. 603, Hogg v. Eiuerr^ou 
 
 Keal property ; transfer of gov- 
 erned by lex loci sitce. a 
 Foreign administrators. 6 
 
 a 10 Wli. 192, McCorniick v. Sulli- 
 van t. 
 6 15 P. 4, Vaugbaii v. Nortbup. 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 
 KEBBISON V. STEWABT, 93 U. S. 155. 
 
 Trustees; when the cestui que I a 94 U. S. 745, Corcoran v. Canal, 
 trust bound by the decree, a \ 
 
 KETCHUM, D'ABCY v. See D'Aroy v. Ketclium. 
 KEY CITY, THE, 14 Wall. 658. 
 
 . 'Equity ; laches, a I a 17 Wall. 81, Harwood ». R. R. Co. 
 
 Rule in admiralty. 6 | 6 95 U. S. 33, Reed v. Ins. Co. 
 
 KEYES, GOLD WASHING CO. v. See Gold Washing Co. v. Keyes. 
 KIBBE, GOODTITI.E v. See Goodtitle v. Kibbe. 
 KIBBE, POLLABD v. See Pollard v. Kibbe. 
 KIMBALI,, THE, 3 Wall. 48. 
 
 Lien for freight ; waiver, a \a 5 Wall. 5.58, The Bird of Paradise 
 Payment by note. 6 | 6 17 Wall. 670, The Emily Souder. 
 
 KCVCBALI. V. COLLECTOB, 10 WaU. 436. 
 
 Duties ; importations ; permits I a 95 U. S. 193, Fabri v. Murphy, 
 to laud and discharge cargo, a \ 
 
 KIMBALIi, FOBSYTH t. See Forsyth v. Kimball. 
 
 KOIBALIi, U. S. V. See U. S. o. Kimball. 
 
 KINCAXD, WELIilAMSON v. See Williamson v. Kincaid. 
 
 KINCANNON, OWINGS v. See Owings v. Kincanuon. 
 
 KINDRED, BABBOWS v. See Barrows v. Kindred. ' 
 
 KENG, EINtAY v. See FinLay v. King. 
 
 KING, THE NEW WORID v. See New World, The, v. King. 
 
 KING T. THOMPSON, 9 P. 880. 
 
 Fraudulent conveyances, a | a 7 H. 227, McLaughlin o. Bank. 
 KING, U. S. T. See U. S. v. King. 
 
 KING, WILM. &, WELD. B. B. v. See Wilm. & Weld. E. E. u. King. 
 KINGSLAND, McCLUBG v. See McClurg v. Klngsland. 
 KINGSLEY, U. S. V. See U. S. -v. Kingsley. 
 KINZIE, BBONSON v. See Bronson v. Kinzie. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 157 
 
 KEBBT, U. S. V. See U. S. .;. Kirby. 
 KXBK, BtrDDICCM: v. See Buddicum v. Kirk. 
 KTBK, JENNISON v. See Jenniscn u. Kirk. 
 KXRK V. SMITH, 9 Wh. 888. 
 
 Limitations; adverse possession, a | a 14 'Wall. 14G, Amastroiigu MoiTill 
 KIKK, SPOFFOKD v. See Spofford v. Kirk. 
 KIRKPATBICK, TT. S. v. See U. S. v. Kirkpatrick. 
 KIBTLAXD, WELLIAMS v. See WilUams v. Kirtland. 
 KISSULI, V. ST. tOUIS PUBMC SCHOOtS, 18 H. 31. 
 
 Missouri land titles; scliool 
 lands, a 
 Certificates of survey. 6 
 
 a 24 H. 64, Jones v. Soulard. 
 
 6 9 Wall. 290, Schools v. Wallier. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 110, Schools v. Bisley. 
 
 KITCHEN V. BANDOIiPH, 93 TJ. S. 86. 
 
 Supersedeas, a | a 93 U. S. 416, Sage v. E. K. Co. 
 
 KL£IN V. BtrSSEl,!., 19 Wall. 423. 
 
 Patent law; reissues, a I a 93 U. S. 464, Russell v. Dodge. 
 
 Error; waiver. 6 | 6 97 U. S. 583, Newcomb v. Wood. 
 
 KlEEifSMITH, DtJNPHY v. See Dunphy v. Kleinsmith. 
 
 KLINGEB V. aUSSOtJia, 13 Wall. S57. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to I a 14 Wall. 26, R. K. v. K. R. 
 State coui'ts ; Federal question, a | a 98 U. S. 141, Bank v. Board Liq. 
 
 KLESfTOCK, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Klintock. 
 
 KNAPP T. BANKS, 8 H. 73. 
 
 Supreme Court ; amount in dis- 
 pute; when determined, a 
 
 a 4 Wall. 165, Walker v. U. S. 
 a 93 U. S. 567, Tel. Co. v. Rogers. 
 a 95 U. S. 695, Thompson v Butlei 
 KNAPP, CHES. & OHIO CANAL v. See Olies. & Ohio Oanal «. Knapp. 
 
 KNIGHT, U. S. V. See U. S. o. Knight. 
 
 KNOOP, PIQUA BANK v. See Piqaa Bank v. Knoop. 
 
 KNOOP, STATE BANK OF OHIO v. See State Bank of Ohio v. Knoop. 
 
 KNOWIiES, BEATYS v. See Beatys v. Knowles. 
 
 KNOWI.ES T. GASLIGHT CO., 19 Wall. 58. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; validity of judg- I a 21 Wall. 454, Hill v. Mendenhall. 
 ments : want of service, a I a 91 U. S. 165, Hall v. Lanning. 
 
 KNOX V. EXCHANGE BANK, 12 WaU. 379. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to j a 99 U. S. 320, University v. People 
 State coiuts ; Federal question, a | 
 
 KNOX V. I.EE. See Legal Tender Cases. 
 
 KNOX, MABSHALL v. See MarshaU v. Knox. 
 
 KNOX V. SMITH, 4 H. 898. 
 
 Equity; jurisdiction, a | a 23 Wall, 470, Lewis v. Cocks. 
 
 KNOX T. SUMMEBS, 3 Wall. 496. 
 
 Jurisdiction over the person; gen- I a 18 Wall. 298, Atkins v. Disinte- 
 «ral appearance, a I grating Co. 
 
158 
 
 MANUAL- OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 KNOX CO, V. ASPINWAll, 31 H. 540. 
 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 b 
 c 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 
 Municipal and county negotiable 
 bonds; subsciiption to railroad 
 stock; conditions in tlieact autlior- 
 izing ; bona-lide holders ; estoppel ; 
 recitals in bonds, a 
 
 Coupons, b 
 
 Corporations; contracts; estop- 
 pel, c 
 
 KNOX CO. T. ASMNWAlt, 84 H. 383 
 
 U. S. courts ; raandaraus against a 
 municipal officers to enforce levy of 
 tax to pay judgment on bonds, a 
 
 21 H. 547, Knox Co. v. Wallace. 
 24 H. 299, Bissell v. Jeffersonville 
 24 H. 37.5, Amey v. Allegh'y City 
 24 H. 383, Knox Co. u Aspinwall 
 
 2 Bl. 724, Moi-an v. Miami Co. 
 1 Wall. 92, Mercer ». Hackett. 
 1 Wall. 202, Gelpcke v Dubuque 
 1 Wall. 393, Meyers. Muscatine 
 
 3 Wall. 667, Kogers v. Burl'gton 
 . 4 Wall. 276, Larned u. Burl'gton 
 
 5 Wall. 7S3, Superv'su. Schenck 
 7 Wall. 105, Aurora v. West. 
 
 10 Wall. 645, Bank v. Bank. 
 
 13 Wall. 305, Pendleton v. Amj-. 
 
 14 Wall. 296, Lexington ». Butler 
 
 15 Wall. 371, Grand Chute v. 
 
 WInegai-. 
 
 16 Wall. 465, Kennicolt v. Snpv's 
 16 Wall. 665, St. Joseph u Kogers 
 20 Wall. 587, Clark v. Iowa City. 
 92 U. S. 490, Coloma ». Eavi;?. 
 92 U. S. 500, Venice v. Murdock. 
 94 U. S. 206, Com'rs v. January. 
 96 U. S. 314, San Antonio v. 
 
 MaheftV. 
 
 98 U. S. 473, Amy v. Dubuque. 
 
 99 U. S. 218, Superv. v Galbraith 
 99 U. S. 682, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 99 U. S. 686, Lyons v. Mnnson. 
 101 U. S. 204, Pompton v. Union. 
 102 U. S. 290, Buchanan v. Litch- 
 field. 
 
 6 Wall. 193, Kiggs v. Johnson. 
 
 6 Wall. 482, Walkely u. Musca- 
 tine. 
 
 7 Wall. 612, Morgan v. Clerk. 
 
 9 Wall. 417, Superv's ». Durant. 
 98 U. S. 397, U. S. D. ST. Orleans 
 
 a 2 Bl. 725, Moran v. Miami Co. 
 
 KNOX CO. V. WAltACB, 81 H. 546. 
 
 County bonds in aid of railroad ; 
 conditions ; I'ecitals ; bona-fide hold- 
 ers, a 
 
 K0I:HI.£B v. BLACK KIVEB FAILS IBON CO., 8 Bl. 71S. 
 
 Corporations; directors are trus- | a 91 U. S. 589, Oil Co. u. Marbiirv. 
 
 tees, a I 
 
 KOHL T. U. S., 91 U. S. 367. 
 
 Constitution ; U. S.; power of I a 94 U. S. 320, U. S. v. Pox 
 emnient domain, a I 
 
 KOUNTZ, EXPRESS CO. V. See Express Co. .. Kountz. 
 KURTZ, BEATXX T. See Beattyu. Kurtz. 
 LA AMISTAD, 5 Wh. 385. 
 
 Prize ; captures in neutral wa- I a 101 U. S. 42, The Florida. 
 
 L" 1 0> Qlm I 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 159 
 
 LABEB T. COOPER, 7 Wall. 565. 
 
 Instructions, a a 20 Wall. 1.S6, Burton v. Driggs. 
 
 Verdict; what is cured by ver- 6 97 U. S. 392, Nauvoo v. Kitter. 
 diet. 6 a 97 U. S. G95, Riich v. Rock Isl'd. 
 
 6 99 U. S. 371, Brooklj'n v. Ins.Co. 
 LA CKOSSE K. K., BKONSON v. See Bronson v. La Crosse R. R. Co. 
 LADD, SILVEK V. See Silver v. Ladd. 
 LADY PIKE, THE, 81 WaU. 1. 
 
 Collision, a 
 
 Snp. Court; review of collision 
 cases. 6 
 
 a 96 U. S. 4fi3, The Lady Pike. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 328, The City of Hartford. 
 
 LAFAYETTE, BLANC v. See Blaao v. Lafayette. 
 LAFAYETTE, POULTNEY v. See Poaltney, ex parte. 
 LAFAYETTE INS. CO. v. FRENCH, 18 H. 405. 
 
 U. S. courts ; jurisdiction where 
 a corporation is a party, a 
 
 Eights of corporation in other 
 States. 6 
 
 Pleading; when defect in decla- 
 ration remedied by replication, c 
 
 Judgments without notice, d 
 
 a 20 H. 231, Cov. Draw. Co. v Shep- 
 herd. 
 
 6 11 Wall. 429, St.LouisuFenyCo 
 
 b 12 Wall. 81, K. R. Co. v. Harris. 
 
 c IG Wall. 365, McNitt v. Turner. 
 
 6 20 Wall. 457, Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 445, Muller v. Dows. 
 
 6 94 U. S. 539, Dos'le v. Ins. Co. 
 
 d 95 U. S. 731, Pennoyer t>. NefT. 
 
 6 96 U. S. 376, ex parte Scholen- 
 berger. 
 
 LAGOTF, NEILSON v. See Neilson v. Lagow. 
 LAIRD, STUART v. See Stuart v. Laird. 
 LAXRD, UNION BANK v. See Union Bank v. Laird. 
 LAMAR V. BBO-WNE, 93 U. S. 187. 
 
 Civil war; capture of cotton, a 
 Exemption of oflBcers of the U. S. 
 from suits. 6 
 
 a 97 U. S. 58, Young v. U. S. 
 b 100 U. S. 169, Dow v. Johnson. 
 
 LA9IAR, REILY V. See Beily v. Lamar. 
 
 LAMB, DAVENPORT v. See Davenport v. Lamb. 
 
 LAMB T. DAVENPORT, 18 TVaU. 313. 
 
 Land titles; Oregon donation | a 94 U. S. 488, Stark u._Starrs 
 
 act. a 
 
 LAMBERT v. GHISELIN, 9 H. 558. 
 
 Negotiable paper; regularity of 
 notice and protest a question of 
 liiw for the court, a 
 
 a 101 U. S. 507, Hall v. Russell. 
 a 18 H. 517, Watson v. Tarpley. 
 
 a 10 Wh. 204, Wright v. Denn. 
 6 10 P. 180, Boon v. Chiles. 
 
 LAMBERT v. PAYNE, 3 Cr. 186. 
 
 Wills ; a devise of the fee. a 
 Bona-fide purchaser, b 
 
 LAMBERT, RICH v. See Rich v. Lambert. 
 LAMBORN V. COUNTY COM'RS, 97 U. S. 181. 
 
 Taxes ; recovery back, a | a 98 U. S. 543, E. R. Co. v. Com'rs. 
 
 LAMPHIRE, JACKSON V. See Jackson v. Lamphire. 
 LA3ISON, CITY v. See City v. Lamson. 
 LAMSON, KENOSHA v. See Kenosha v. Lamson. 
 
160 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 I.ANBES V. BBAIfT, 10 H. 348. 
 
 Missouri land titles ; gi-aiit to the 
 State ; when land selected attaches 
 to grant; surveys, a 
 
 Notice of claim ; possession. 6 
 
 Patents; relation back; enure- 
 ment; estoppel, c 
 
 Equitable title; certificates, d 
 
 Court will consider the several 
 parts constituting the title and take 
 them toffetlier as one act. e 
 
 Iniperject Spanish title, f 
 
 Where there have beeu two grants 
 under former government, g 
 
 Judgments; when tliey cannot 
 be attacked collaterally. /* 
 
 t ANE, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Lane. 
 LANE V. VICK, 3 H. 4:11. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court; law passed before the 
 Union will not be reviewed, a 
 
 liANB CO. V. OREGON, 7 WaU. 76. 
 
 Constitution ; relations between 
 the States and general govcrn- 
 ent. a 
 
 Taxing power of the govern- 
 ment, b 
 
 Of that of the States, c 
 
 liANGDEAU V. HANBS, »! WaU. 635. 
 
 Land claims under treaties ; pat- 1 a 95 U. S. 555, MorrowcWhituey. 
 ent; operation of. a \ 
 
 lANGDON, GtEimY v. See Glenny «. Langdon. 
 liANGE, EX PAKTE, 18 WaU. 163. 
 
 a 12 H. 72, Lessieur v. Price. 
 b 14 H. 521, Marsh u. Brooks, 
 c 21 H. 289, Fi-cnch v. Spenser, 
 c 21 11. 302, Morehouse v. Phelps. 
 b 21 H. 495, Lea «. Polk Copper (Jo. 
 d 22 H. 338, Bertliold v. McDonald. 
 e 23 H. 498, Yontz v. U. S. 
 /24 H. 304, Masscy v. Papin. 
 c 3 Wall. 491, Beard v. Federy. 
 c 6 Wall. 380, Grisar i-. McDowell. 
 g 8 Wall. 661, Maguire v. Tyler. 
 /17 Wall. 281, Tyler v. Maguire. 
 h 18 Wall. 464, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 a 98 U. S. 212, Snyder v. Sickles. 
 
 a 5 H, 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 725, Texas v. White. 
 6 8 Wall. 541, Bank v. Fen no. 
 b 9 Wall. 591, Tliompson v Pac. E. 
 a 11 Wall. 125, Collector v. Day. 
 c 18 Wall. 29, E. R. v. Peniston. 
 
 Judgments ; may be good in part 
 and bad in part, a 
 
 Supreme Court; habeas corpus. 6 
 
 When judgraeiits are void, c 
 
 Double sentences, d 
 
 Control of court over its judg- 
 ments, e 
 
 a 91 U. S. 27, Semmes v. U. S. 
 
 b 93 U.S. 23, ex parte Faiks. 
 
 c 93 U. S. 283, Windsor b. Mc- 
 Veigh. 
 
 d 99 U. S. 71, Lango D. Benedict. 
 
 6 100 U. S. 343, expaHe Virginia. 
 
 b 100 U. S. 375, expaHe Siebold. 
 
 e 101 U. S. 752, Goddard i; Ordwav 
 
 d 102 U. S. 611, U. S. V. Chouteau. 
 WANGLES, BAXI, v. See Ball v. Langles. 
 LANGIET, MARKET v. See Markey v. Langley. 
 liANIER, DAVTDSOIf v. See Davidson 1). Lanier. 
 LAfOJSSE V. BARKER, 3 Wli. 101. 
 
 Contracts; what law governs. a\a 6 P. 641, Boyle u. Zacharie. 
 
 U 91 U. S. 411, Seudder v. Bank. 
 I.APENE, V. S. v. See U. S. v. Lapene. 
 LAPEYRE V. V. S., 17 WaU. 191. 
 
 Statutes and p r o c 1 a m a t i o n s ; 
 when they take elfect. a 
 
 a 97 U. S. 170, U. S. v. Norton. 
 a 97 U. S. 383, Burgess w. Salmon. 
 a 102 U. S. 437, McElratli v. U. S.^ 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIOXS. 
 
 161 
 
 lAPICE, SUKGETT V. See Surgett d. Lapice. 
 LAPSiET, BABB v. See Barr v. Lapsley. 
 lAPSLET, SPENSEB v. See Spenser v. Lapsley. 
 I.ABAMIE CO. V. AXBANT CO., 98 U. S. 307. 
 
 ^lunicipal corpoi-ations; division I alOOU.S.526,Mt.PleasantuBeck- 
 anc1 annexation ; effect on debts, a with. 
 
 LA ROCHE V. JONES, 9 H. 170. 
 
 Land titles ; Spanisli grants N. 
 31° N. latitude ; invalidity of. a I 
 
 I.ABDNEB, MUBBAY v. See Murray v. Lardner. 
 tABKIIf, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Larkin. 
 LASEEE T. BOCHEBEAU, 17 TVaU. 437, 
 
 a 10 H. 641, Kobinson v. Minor. 
 
 Civil war; validity of sales of 
 property of owners absent within 
 the Confederate lines, a 
 
 a 18 Wall. 110, University ». Finch. 
 
 I.ASH, DATTTON v. See Dayton v. Lash. 
 lATHAM & DEMING'S APPEAX, 9 WaU. 145. 
 
 Supreme Court ; right of appel- 
 lant to dismiss his appeal, a 
 
 tATHBOP V. DRAKE, 91 V. S. S16. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; jurisdiction of the 
 
 Circuit Cts. in suits by assignees, a 
 
 Jurisdiction of the State courts. 6 
 
 a 94 U. S. 259, U. S. v. Young. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 182, Burback». Bigelow. 
 b 93 U. S. 133, Claflin w. Houseman 
 a 94 U. S. 559, Dutclier v. Wright. 
 6 98 U. S. 25, Glenny v. Langdon. 
 
 tATHBOP T. JUBSON, 19 H. 66. 
 
 Supreme Court ; how error must I a 20 H. 441, Suydam «.W411iamson 
 appear, a \ 
 
 liAtTB, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Laub. 
 
 I.AVENDAR, TONI.ET v. See Tonley v. Lavendar. 
 
 I,A VENGEAJfCE, U. S. v. See U. S. v. La Vengeance. 
 
 tATV, ADAMS V. See Adams v. Law. 
 
 I,AW V. CROSS, 1 Bl. 636. 
 
 Partnership ; when in suit by 
 partner all the partners need not 
 be joined, a 
 
 Instructions; exceptions, b 
 
 LAW, PRATT V. See Pratt v. Law. 
 LAW, BAY v. See Ray v. Law. 
 LAWLER V. WAXKER, 14 H. 149. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State courts; how the Federal ques- 
 tion must appear, a 
 
 a 2 Bl. 584, The Potomac. 
 & 3 Wall. 142, Cliquot's Champ'e. 
 6 10 Wall. 115, Schools v. Risley. 
 b 16 Wall. 517, Tweed's Case. 
 
 a 18 H. 512, Maxwell v. Kewbold. 
 a 4 Wall. 180, E. E. Co. v. Eock. 
 a 10 Wall. 510, Messengers. Mason 
 a 11 Wall. 38, Parmelee t>. Law- 
 rence. 
 a 92 U. S. 329, Browii v. Atwell. 
 See Fowle v. Lawrason. 
 
 LAWRASON, FOWLE v, 
 
 LAWRENCE T. ALLEN, 7 H. 797. 
 
 Duties; imports; names by which I a 92 U. S. 471, Tyug v. Grinnell. 
 articles are taxed, a | 
 
 LAWRENCE, BANK OF COLUMBIA T. See Bank of Col. v. Lawrence. 
 11 
 
162 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 LAWRENCE v. CASWEH, 13 H. 438.' 
 
 Duties; asspssment. a I « 24 H. 526, Belcher ». Linn. 
 
 Snit to recover back duties. 6 | 6 7 Wall. 127, Nicliols ». U. S. 
 
 LAWRENCE, COL. INS. CO. T. See Col. Ins. Co. d. Lawrence. 
 
 LAWRENCE v. McCALMONT, 8 H. 486. 
 
 Guaranty; notice, a | a 10 H. 472, Man'f'g Co. u. Welch. 
 
 LAWRENCE, MAILLARD v. See MaiUard u. Lawrence. 
 
 LAWRENCE V. MINTURN, 17 H. 109. 
 
 Jettison, a 
 
 Bills of lading; effect of, as re- 
 gards the con.5ignee. 6 
 
 Admiralty ; libel by agent, c 
 
 Carriers by sea; liability for 
 loss. A 
 
 a 19 H. 165, Dnpont ». Vance. 
 
 a 21 H. 345, McKinley v. Morrish. 
 
 6 3 Wall. 457, The Sally Magee. 
 
 h 3 Wall. 553, The Bermuda. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 231, Star of Hope. 
 
 a 9 AVall. 684, The Portsmouth. 
 
 c 14 Wall. 109, The Thames. 
 
 c 14 Wall. 266, Vaughan u. The 
 Telegraph. 
 
 A 14 Wall. 599, The Delaware. 
 LAWRENCE, PARMELEB v. See Parmelee v. Lawrence. 
 LAWRENCE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Lawrence. 
 
 LAWRENCE CO., WOODS v. See Woods v. Lawrence Oo. * 
 
 LAWSON, U. S. V. See U. S. i). Lawson. 
 LEAGUE V. BE TOCNG, 11 H. 800. 
 
 Texas land titles ; head-right to | a 14 H. 79, Herman v. Phalen. 
 lands; fraudulent certificates, a \ 
 
 LEAGUE V. EGERT, 24 H. 865. 
 
 InvYVh; Sm',:!".^ ^-'' ""'J'^"^ *°1- 1 « 24 H. 434, SuydaraB.William.son. 
 low the State decisions, a | a 4 Wall. 204, Christy «. Pridgeon. 
 
 LEAR, ARMSTRONG v. See Armstrong v. Lear. 
 
 LEAR, ESTHO v. See Estho i>. Lear. 
 
 LEAVENWORTH CO. T. BARNES, 94 U. S. tO. 
 
 County bonds in aid of railroads ; 
 recitals ; estoppel ; bona-fide pur- 
 chasers, a 
 
 i U. S. 102, Davies Co. v. Huide- 
 koper. 
 
 LEAVENWORTH R. R. v. U. S., 93 U. S. 733. 
 
 Grants of lands by Congress to 
 railroads; what is land 'reserved.' a 
 
 When title vests. 6 
 
 Acts making donations; pre- 
 existing rights, c 
 
 a 92 U. S. 
 h 97 U.S. 
 6 99 U.S. 
 c 101 U. S. 
 6 101 U. S. 
 
 LE BARON, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Le Baron. 
 LE BLANC, U. S. t. See U. S. v. Le Blanc. 
 LECANU, LEFTWICH t. See Leftwioh ^. Lecanu 
 LE CLAIRE, MAY t. See May •«. Le Claire. 
 LE COMPTE V. U. S., 11 H. 124. 
 
 Louisiana land titles; imperfect | a 101 U S 
 grants; location, a \ 
 
 LECRAW, BOSTON v. See Boston ^. Lecraw. 
 
 762, Newhall d. Sanger. 
 496, R. R. ». R. R.° 
 475, R. R. Co. V. Ailing. 
 277, BroderB.WaterCo. 
 509, Hall V. Russell. 
 
 707, D'Auterive«.U.S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPKEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 163 
 
 IiEDOrX T. BLACK, 18 H. 475. 
 
 Laud titles; floating grants; first I a 18 Wall. 267, Henshaw ». Bissell, 
 survey ; when belter title, a \ 
 
 tEE, BAXE OF r. S. V. See Bank of U. S. v. Lee. 
 X£E, CROCKETT v. See Crockett v. Lee. 
 TjEE t. sick, 10 p. 483. 
 
 Letters of guaranty, a 
 Statute of frauds; agreement to 
 pay debt of another. 6 
 
 a 12 P. 207, Adams v. Jones. 
 6 1 H. 180, Bell v. Bruin, 
 •a 2 H. 445, Lawrence e. McCal- 
 moat. 
 
 I.EE, GARCIA T. See Garcia v. Lee. 
 I.EE, HOPKINS V, See Hopkins v. Lee. 
 lEE, LODGE V. See Lodge ii. Lee. 
 LEE T. MONROE, 7 Cr. 368. 
 
 Equity; fraud; rescission, a 
 U. S.; when bound by acts and 
 declarations of agents, b 
 
 LEE, NOONAN v. See Noonan v. Lee. 
 
 LEE, OGLE V. See Ogle v. Lee. 
 
 LEE CO., THOMPSON v. See Thompson v. Lee Oo. 
 
 LEE T. -WATSON, 1 WaU. 337. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter 
 in dispute, a 
 
 LEE CO. V, :]^OGEBS, 7 Wall. 181. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads ; want of authority ; bona-fidc 
 holders, a 
 
 Municipal corporations; legisla- 
 tive power over; obligation of con- 
 tracts, h 
 
 LEE CO., WEBER v. See Weber v. Lee Oo. 
 LEEDS V. MARINE INS. CO., 3 Wh. 380. 
 
 Equity; proof must correspond I a 10 P. 209, Boon v. Chiles, 
 with case made in bill, a 
 
 a 8 H. 149, Veazie v. Williams. 
 6 93 U. S. 257, Whiteside v. U. S. 
 6 96 U. S. 692, HawkiaS v, U. S. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 242, Schacker «. Ins. Co. 
 a 97 U. S. 565, Gray v. Blancliard. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 104, Warren v. Marcy. 
 6 100 U. S. 532, Mt. Pleasant v. 
 Beckwith. 
 
 LBFETNGWELL v. WARREN, 3 Bl. 
 
 U. S. courts ; when they follow 
 the decisions of the State courts, a 
 Statute of limitations, b 
 
 599. 
 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 b 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 
 LEFELEB, tJ. S. v. See XT. S. v. Leffler. 
 
 2 Bl. 518, Gilman v. Sheboygan 
 2 Bl. 534, Summer ». Hicks. 
 1 Wall. 205, Gelpckew Dubuque 
 
 5 Wall. 289, Croxall v. Shercrd 
 
 6 Wall. 630, Prov. Inst. v. Mass 
 6 Wall. 641, Hamilton v. Mass. 
 
 15 Wall. 438, Bichmondv. Smith 
 18 Wall. 82, Superv'r's v. U. S. 
 94 U. S. 770, Lippincott v. Mit- 
 chell. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 637, Davie v. Briggs. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 471, Amy K. Dubuque. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 52, Fairfield v Gallatin 
 
 b 100 U. S. 583, Dickerson v. Col- 
 grove. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 677, M^ch. Co. v. Gage 
 
164 
 
 MANUAL OF STJPKEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 lEFTWICH V. LECANU, 4 Wall. 18T. 
 
 Bills of exception, a 
 
 a 17 Wall. 410, Keed v. Gardner. 
 
 I-EGAX. TENDEK CASES, 18 Wall. 497. 
 
 Constitution; legal tender, u 
 
 lEGGETT V. AVBKT, 101 V. S. 856. 
 
 Patent law ; reissues, a 
 
 a 13 Wall. 606, Dooley v. Smith. 
 a 14 Wall. 268, Vaughan v. The 
 
 . Telegraph. 
 a 14 Wall. 308, Bigler v. Waller, 
 o 15 Wall. 105, R. E. v. Johnson. 
 a 22 Wall. 112, Maryland v. K. R. 
 a 96 Wall. 587, Bissell v. Heyward. 
 
 I fli 102 U. S. 228, Goodyear ». Dayis. 
 
 I.EGGETT, BTUMPHBEYS v. See Hamphreys v. Leggett. 
 LEGGETT V. BTOMPHKEYS, SI H. 76. 
 
 Sureties, a, 1 a 2 Wall. 235, Smith v. U. S. 
 
 Eqnity; enjoining judgments. 6 I 6 94 U. S. 658, Crim v. Handley. 
 
 lEGBAITD V. DARNALI,, 8 P. 667. 
 
 Slaves; descendants of; right to l a 19 H. 423, Bred Scott r. Sandford 
 sue in U. S. courts, a \ 
 
 lEITENSDOBFBK v. WEBB, 80 H. 176. 
 
 War ; power of the President and 
 national forces in territory occu- 
 pied, a 
 
 L-ELAITD, KELSON T. See Nelson v. Leland. 
 ICELAND V. WIIiKINSON, 6 F. 317. 
 
 Sup. Court U. S. ; private laws 
 must appear in the record, a 
 
 Constitution ; " faith and credit," 
 to be given judgments, b 
 
 LEtAKD V. WIDKISrSON, lO P. 894. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 Curative legislation. 6 
 
 LEtAND, WILKINSON v. See Wlllcinson v. Leland 
 LENOX, GOBMAN v. See, Gorman i). Lenox. 
 LENOX V. PEOtTT, 3 Wh. 680. 
 
 Equity ; allegata and probata, a 
 Kegotiahle paper; endorsers; 
 When entitled to aid of equity, b 
 
 LENOX T. BOBEBTS, 8 Wh. 373. 
 
 Negotiable paper; notice; due 
 diligence, a 
 
 Equity ; will not allow a trust to 
 fail for want of trustee. 6 
 
 General assignment by the cor- 
 poration to the corporators, c 
 
 LENOX, YEATON v. See Teaton v. Lenox. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 133, The Grapeshot. 
 a 15 Wall. 384, Pennywit v. Eaton 
 a 20 Wall. 394, N. Orl. v. S. S. Co. 
 a 21 Wall. 88, Harailfon v. Dillon. 
 a 22 Wall. 296, Bank v. Bank. 
 
 a 20 H. 440, Suydam v. Williamson 
 b 16 Wall. 619, Crapo ». Kelly. 
 
 I a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Chicago. 
 I 6 7 Wall. 624, Beloit n. Morgan. 
 
 a 10 P. 209, Boon i'. Chiles. 
 a 5 H. 204, Creath v. Sims. 
 6 22 Wall. 593, Ross v. Jones. 
 
 a 10 P. 573, Dickens v. Beal. 
 b 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas, 
 c 16 H. 480, Bason v. Robertson. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 165 
 
 t:^ON V. GAXCEAAN, 11 WaU. 1S4, 
 
 Attacliment against vessel ; not 
 proceeding in aJmiral'ty. a 
 
 State cannot create maritime 
 lien. 6 
 
 Admiralty jnrisdictioii ; collision 
 on navigable waters, c 
 
 a 15 Wall. 384, Pennvwit v Eaton 
 a 16 Wall. 538, Sream. Co.!) Chase 
 & 20 Wall. 218, The Lottavvana. 
 6 93 U. S. 356, Morton a. Switzer 
 6 99 U. S. 43, U. S. u. Ames, 
 c 102 U. S. 119. Schoonmaker v. 
 Gilmore. 
 
 liEONAKD, CBOTJDSON' T. See Croudson i). Leonard. 
 I.EONABD V. BAVIS, 1 Bl. 483. 
 
 Sale; when complete, a \a 6 Wall. 554, Tome c. Dubois. 
 
 Delivery. 6 
 
 6 100 U. S. 128, Hatch v. Oil Co. 
 
 JjEONAKD, JEIOflSONS V. See Jenaisons b. Leonard, 
 IE KOT V. BEAKD, 8 H. 451. 
 
 Agency ; ambiguous powers. a\ a 13 H. 356, Very v. Levy. 
 IX. KOT, MARYLAND DfS. CO. v. See Maryland Ins. Co. v. Le Eoy. 
 1X1 KOT T. TATHAM, 14 H. 146. 
 
 Patent law; '"invention." a 
 Specification ; construction of. 6 
 
 IiEBOT, WADE v. See Wade v. Leroy. 
 liES BOIS V. BBAMELL, 4 H. 449. 
 
 Missouri land titles; commons, a 
 Complete and incomplete titles ; 
 action of political department on. b 
 Confirmed Spanish grant and 
 grant of St. Louis commons. . c 
 Confirmation by act Congress, d 
 Jnniorand senior confirmations, e 
 Ejectment may be brought after 
 survey is made, approved and re- 
 corded. ,f 
 
 a 15 H. 106, O'Reilly v. Morse. 
 b 15 H. 338, Winans v. Denmead. 
 a 22 H. 134, Le Eoy v. Tatham. 
 
 a 4 H. 445, Maekey v. Dillon. 
 6 7 H. 590, Kennedy v. Hunt, 
 c 8 H. 330, Bissell v. Penrose, 
 d 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 e 10 H. 369, Landes v. Brant. 
 a 16 H. 507, Guitard v. Stoddard. 
 6 19 H. 80, Willot V. Sandford. 
 / 19 H. 334, Brvan v. Forsyth. 
 c 22 H. 341, Be'rthold u. McDonald. 
 b 14 Wall. 313, Dent v. Emraerger. 
 
 I.ESI.rE, CBAIG V. See Oraig v. Leslie. 
 LESSXECTB V. FBICE, 13 H. 75. 
 
 Public lands; grants by Congress 
 to the States ; act of 1841 ; what 
 words import a grant in future, a 
 When legal title vests, b 
 New Madrid location, c 
 Eelation ; doctrine of. d 
 Judgments by divided court, e 
 
 a 15 H. 445, Foley ». Harrison. 
 
 b 17 H. 552, Fremont v. U. S. 
 
 c 22 H. 159, Hale v. Gaines. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 380, Kice v. Railroad Co. 
 
 b 6 Wall. 150, Rector ». Ashley. 
 
 d 13 Wall. 101, Gibsons Chouteau 
 
 c 19 Wall. 633, Maekey v. Easton. 
 
 6 21 Wall. 60, Schulenberg v. 
 Harriman. 
 
 c 92 U. S. 713, Hot Springs Cas. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 509, Hall v. Russell. 
 
 £ 102 U. S. 676, Hartmana. Green- 
 how. 
 
 lETSON, LOUISVTLIiE K. B. CO. v. See Louisville B. R. Co. v. Letson. 
 LEVEE COMMISSIONEKS, HEINE v. See Heine v. Levee Commissioners. 
 LEVY T. AKBEDOISnDO, 13 P. 318. 
 
 Supreme Court ; i-eversal with a 2 Wall. 195, Chittenden v Brew- 
 leave to produce further evidence, a ster. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 227, May v. Le Claire. 
 
166 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPEEME COURT DBCISrONS. 
 
 liEVY V. riTZPATBICK, 16 P. 110. 
 
 U. S. courts ; jurisdiction over 
 non-resident defendants ; attach- 
 ments, a 
 
 Louisiana ; executory process. 5 
 
 liEVr T. GADSBT, 3 Cr. ISO. 
 
 Usury, a 
 
 Jury; construction of written in- 
 sti'uments is for the court, b 
 
 a 20 H. 314, Chaffee v. Hayward. 
 b IT Wall. 18, Marin v. Lally. 
 
 a 7 F. 103, Nictiols v. Fearson. 
 b 17 Wall. 142, Gfoddardu. Foster. 
 a 100 U. S. 249, Gates v. Bank. 
 
 I/EVy, NICHOLS V. See Nichols v. Levy. 
 I.EVT V. STEWABT, 11 WaU. 8491. 
 
 Limitations; suspended during 
 the civil war. a 
 
 a 14 Wall. 236, Caperton k Bowyer 
 a 22 Wall. 587, Ross v. Jones. 
 a 92 U. S. 115, Harrison v. Myer. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 227, May v. Le Claire. 
 6 22 Wall. 253, French v. Hay. 
 
 LEVY, V. S. V. See V. S. v. Lery. 
 lEVT, TEBY v. See Tery v. Levy. 
 liBVT COUKT V. KLNGOLJ), 5 P. 45*. 
 
 U. S.; suits by; who must rep- I a 7 Wall. 457, Confiscation Cases, 
 resent, a \ 
 
 I-EWIS V. CAMPAr, 3 WaU. lOS. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to i a 6 Wall. 262, Millengar a; Hartnpee 
 State courts ; Federal question, a ( 
 
 LEWIS V. DARMNG, 16 H. 7. 
 
 Supreme Court; reversal with 
 leave to make new allegations, a 
 
 Equity; power to restrain acts 
 beyond territorial jurisdiction, b 
 
 LEWIS V. LEWIS, 7 H. 778. 
 
 Limitations ; effect of repeal of i a 17 Wall. 600, Sohn v. Watterson. 
 savings clause on existing rights, a \ 
 
 LEWIS T. McEAKLAIO), 9 Cr. 151. 
 
 Executors ; letters testamentaiy 
 give no power to sue out of juris- 
 diction of the court gi'anting. o 
 
 LEWIS v. MARSHALL, 6 P. 470. 
 
 Statute of limitations, a 
 
 ^ LEWIS V. V. B. 98 U. S. SIS. 
 
 U. S.; priority of. a 
 
 LEXINGTON, THE. See New Jersey S. Nay. Oo. „. Merchants' Bank. 
 LEXINGTON v. BUTLER, 14 Wall. 889. 
 
 a 9 Wh. 566, Kerr v. Moon. 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 
 I a 2 Bl. 606, Lefflngwell v. Wan-en. 
 I a 93 tr. S. 643, Bayne o. U. S. 
 
 Coupons; limitations, a 
 Mniiicipsil and county bonds in 
 aid of railroads; rights of bona- 
 iUlc holders ; conditions ; estoppel, b 
 Lis pendens, c 
 
 a 20 Wall. 587, Clarice v. Iowa. 
 b 94 U. S. 206, Comra'r v. January 
 
 S. 109, Warren e. Marcy. 
 
 S. 473, Amy v. Dubuque. 
 
 c 97 U. 
 a9SU. 
 
 LEXINGTON, McCONNELL v. See McConnell v. Lexington. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 167 
 
 IICENSE CASES, 5 H. 573. 
 
 Constitution ; commerce ; regu- 
 lation of. a 
 
 Police power. 6 
 
 Tax on imports ; when State 
 may exercise the power to tax. c 
 
 Concurrent powers, d 
 
 a 14 H. 572, Veazie u. Moore. 
 
 6 22 H. 241, Sinnot v. Davenport. 
 
 6 3 Wall. 730, Gil man v. Phila. 
 
 c 5 Wall, 479, Pervear v. Comra. 
 
 c 8 Wall. 139, Woodruff v. Par- 
 ham. 
 
 b 9 Wall. 45, U. S. v. De Witt. 
 
 c 13 Wall. 33, Low v. Austin. 
 
 6 16 Wall. 64, Slaughter -House 
 Cases. 
 
 d 16 Wall. 482, Osborne v. Mobile. 
 
 d 92 U. S. 274, Henders'nw Mayor 
 
 6 94 U. S. 125, Munn v. Illinois. 
 
 b 97 U. S. 33, Beer Co. v. Mass. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 503, Patterson v. Ken. 
 
 d 102 U, S. 701, Mobile v. Kimball. 
 
 LICENSE TAX CASES, 6 WaU. 468. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com 
 merce; imports; tax on. a 
 Police' regulations. 6 
 Direct taxes, c 
 
 a 5 Wall. 478, Pervear v. Comm. 
 6 9 Wall, 45, U. S. v. De Witt, 
 c 23 Wall. 348, Scholey v. Eew, 
 a 93 U. S. 122, Ins. Co. v. City. 
 
 lilDE, WOOD V. See Wood v. Tjde. 
 
 L,rFE ZNS. CO., JEEFKEES v. See Jeffries v. Life Ins. Oo. 
 LIFE ESS. CO., MUXEB f. See Miller v. Life Ins. Co. 
 LIFE rtfS. CO. V. TEKKT, 15 Wall. 583. 
 
 Insurance ; suicide, a I a 93 U. S. 286, Bigelow v. Ins. Co. 
 
 LIFE AITD FEBE ENS. CO. v. 
 
 . a 95 U. S; 241, 
 
 ADAJMS, 8 P. 891. 
 
 Ins. Co. V. Eodel. 
 
 Mandamus by Sup. Court will 
 not lie to direct what judgment the 
 the court below should enter, a 
 
 LEFE Aia> FERE ENS. CO. v. 
 
 a 9 P. 592, Ins. Co. v. Adams. 
 
 a 13 P. 289, ex parte Hoyt. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 166, ex parte Newman. 
 
 WILSON, 6 P. 891. 
 
 a 8 P. 306, Ins. Co. v. Adams. 
 a 11 H. 287, Eeeside u. Walker. 
 a 22 H. 181, U. S. v. Addison. 
 a 7 Wall. 376, ex parte Bradley. 
 a 14 Wall. 166, ex pa?-ie Newman. 
 6 93 U. S. 234, Yznaga del Valley 
 
 V. Harrison. 
 a 101 U. S. 720, ex paHe E. E. Co. 
 
 LEFE AND FIKE INS. CO., WILSON v. See Wilson «. Life and Fire Ins. Co. 
 LINCOLN v. CLAFLIN, 7 WaU. 136. 
 
 Supreme Court U.S.; mandamus 
 will not lie to direct a judge what 
 judgment to enter; when it lies to 
 compel him to sign a judgment; 
 ministerial duties, a 
 
 Louisiana ; judge must sign judg- 
 ment. 6 
 
 Bills of exception. 
 Evidence ; fraud. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 568, Laber v. Cooper. 
 6 13 Wall. 467, Butler v. Watkins. 
 a 17 Wall. 411, Eeed v. Gardner. 
 a 98 IT. S. 284, Beckwith v. Bean. 
 
 104. 
 
 a 10 P. 573, Dickens v. Beal. 
 
 LINDENBEBGEK v. BEALL, 6 Wh. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice, u 
 LINDSAY, MOBDECAI v. See Mordecai v. Lindsay. 
 LINDSAY, BAILBOAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. i>. Lindsay. 
 LINDSAY, BIGGS V. See Eiggs -o. Lindsay. 
 LINDSEY, FOWLEB V. See Fowler v. Llndsey. 
 
168 
 
 MANUAL OF BUPKEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 1 Willi. 115, Minn.!;. B:ichekler. 
 b 5 Wall. 565, U. S. v. Comm. 
 6 7 Wall. 224, Silver v. Ladd. 
 b 13 Wall. 85, Johnson v. Tovvsley 
 & 13 Wall. 102, Gibson v. Chouteau 
 
 a 12 P. 294, Galloway v. Finley. 
 b 13 Wall. 104, Gibson v. Chouteau 
 e 14 Wall. 145, Armstrong uMorrill 
 c 98 U. S. 488, U. S. v. Thompson. 
 
 lENUSET V. HA WES, 3 Bl. 554. 
 
 Land titles ; when jui-isdiction of 
 land oflSoeis exclusive, a 
 
 Bemedy of holder of supei-ior 
 equity; construction of pre-emp- 
 tion laws, b 
 
 LrfJDSET V. MXt.I.EK, 6 P. 666. 
 
 Patents ; military lands ; void 
 entries, a 
 
 Power of Congress over the pub- 
 lic lands cannot be obstructed by- 
 State legislation. 6 
 
 U. S. ; limitations, c 
 
 LENUSEY, WATTS v. See Watts v. Lindsey. 
 
 LUSIf, BELCHER v. See Belcher v. Linn. 
 
 LDfN, MECH. BANK OF ALEX. v. See Mechanics' Bank of Alex. v. Linn. 
 
 LrNN, U. S. V. See U. S. o. Linn. 
 
 tnSSEED, BAGS OF. See Bags of Linseed. 
 
 LINTHICUM:, LUTZ v. see Lutz v. Linthioum. 
 
 LINTON T. STANTON, 12 H. 485. 
 
 Writ of error to State court ; how I a 1 Wall. 517, Roosevelt v. Meyer, 
 the Federal question must appear, a \ 
 
 L'INTINCIBI.B, 1 Wh. 338. 
 
 Admiralty ; immunity of foreign 
 public vessels, a 
 
 LIONBEBGEB v. BOUSE, 9 WaU. 473. 
 
 National bank shares; taxation, a | a 9 Wall. 590, Thompson v. R. R. 
 LITCHFIELD, DTJB. & PAC. B. K. v. See Dubuque & Pao. B. R. ii. Litchfield. 
 LITCHFIELD v. KEGISTEK, 9 Wall. 575. 
 
 Mandamus to executive oUicers. a\a 93 U. S. 173, French v. Fyan. 
 
 a 101 XJ. S. 475, Marquez v. Frisbie 
 
 LITER V. GREEN, 8 WTi. 306. 
 
 Error; discretion cannot gen- I a 11 Wall. 676, Cook v. Burnley, 
 erally be reviewed, a \ 
 
 LITER, GREEN v. See Green v. Liter. 
 LITTLE V. ALEXANDER, 31 W^all. 500. 
 
 Bankruptcy; preferences, a \ a 102 U. S. 268, Rogers v. Palmer. 
 
 LITTLE V. BARREME, 3 Cr. 170. 
 
 Public officers ; torts, a | a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 
 LITTLEFIELD v. PERRY, 31 Wall. 305. 
 
 U. S. courts; patent rights, a | a 99 U. S. 551, Kartell «. Tilghman. 
 
 LIVINGSTON V. MARYLAND INS. CO., 7 Cr. 506. 
 
 Insurance ; representations, a | a 8 H. 245, Clark v. Ins. Co. 
 
 LIVINGSTON T. MOORE, 7 P. 551. 
 
 a 7 Wh. 284, The Santissima Trin- 
 idad. 
 
 Constitution; first ten ameiid- 
 nients do not apply to the States, a 
 Equity ; when it f ollo\vs the law. 6 
 Power of Legislature to give va- 
 lidity to past deeds, c 
 
 a 14 P. 586, Holmes v. Jennison. 
 a 9 Wall. 278, Justices v. Murray. 
 6 15 Wall. 229, Oelriclis v. Spain. 
 a 21 WaU. 557, Edwards v. Elliott, 
 c 23 Wall. 149. Randell v. Kreiger. 
 a 92 U. S. 552, U. S. v. Cruikshank 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 169 
 
 MVTNGSTON V. STORY, 9 P. 655. 
 
 Louisiana ; practice in U. S. 
 courts, a 
 
 Petitory actions ; ejectment ; re- 
 covery must be on leapal title. 6 
 
 Cliancery jurisdiction of U. S. 
 courts not controlled by State prac- 
 tice, c 
 
 LIVrNGSTON V. STORY, 11 P. 351. 
 
 U. S. courts ; citizenship, a I 
 
 a 1.5 P. 13, Gaines v. Kelt. 
 a 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 b 10 H. 264, Gilmer v. Poiudexter. 
 c 13 H. 270, Neves v. Scott. 
 6 20 H. 17. Jones v. Moilasters. 
 c 21 H. 592, Barber v. Barber, 
 c 23 H. 105, Green v. Creighton. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 423, De Sobry v. Nichol- 
 son. 
 
 LIVINGSTON, STORY v. See Story v. Livingston. 
 LIVINGSTON V. ■WOODWORTH, 15 H. 546. 
 
 Patent law ; 
 fringement. a 
 
 damages for in- 
 
 LLOYD v. ALEXANDER, 1 Cr. 365. 
 
 Citation, a 
 
 LLOYD V. EULTON, 91 U. S. 485 
 
 Voluntary conveyances, a 
 
 LLOYD T. HOUGH, 1 H. 159. 
 
 Kent ; action to i-ecover. a 
 
 LLOYD V. SCOTT, 9 P. 438. 
 
 Usury, a 
 LLOYD, SCOTT v. See Scott v. Lloyd. 
 LOAN AlSSOCIATION v. TOPEKA, 20 WaU. 658. 
 
 a 20 H. 202, Dean v. Mason. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 802, Rubber Co. v Good- 
 year. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 70, Birdsall v. Coolidge 
 
 a 97 U. S. 139, Elizabeth v. Pave- 
 ment Co. 
 
 a 5 Cr. 321, Welch u. Mandervillc. 
 a 6 H. 88, Villabolos a. U. S. 
 a 93 U. S. 87, Kitchen v Kandolph 
 a 99 U. S. 609, Bank v. Bank. 
 
 I a 101 U. S.' 229, Jones v. Clifton. 
 I a 8 H. 409, West v. Smith. 
 I a 12 P. 143. Scott v. Lloyd. 
 
 Negotiable p.aper ; liability of 
 vendors of void paper, a 
 
 Public use ; bonds issued by mu- 
 nicipal corporations. 6 
 
 a 92 U. S. 448, Otis v. Culhim. 
 6 94 U. S. 314, Burl'ton v. Beasley. 
 & 98 U. S. 394, U. S. V. N. Orleans. 
 6 99 U. S. 598, U. S. v. Macon Co. 
 
 LOCKE T. UNITED STATES, 7 Cr. 3,'!9. 
 
 Duties; construction of collection 
 law of March 2, 1799; permits to 
 land, a 
 
 Information of forfeiture, b 
 
 Probable cause, c 
 
 a 8 Cr. 109, Harford v. U. S. 
 6 3 Wh. 246, Gelston «. Hoyt. 
 b 4H. 243, Clifton u. U. S. 
 c 3 Wall. 162, The Thompson. 
 c 17 Wall. 92, Averill v. Smith, 
 c 18 Wall. 540, Chaffee v. U. S. 
 c 97 U. S. 265, Lilieutliall's To- 
 bacco. 
 
 LOCKHART, HORN v. See Horn v. Lockhart. 
 LOCKWOOD, MOREY v. See Morey v. LockWDod. 
 LOCKWOOD, RAILROAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Lookwood. 
 LODGE V. LEE, 6 Cr. 337. 
 
 Grants; construction of. a | a 6P. 739, U. S 
 
 LOETCS, BRANDON v. See Brandon v. Loftas. 
 
 Arredondo. 
 
170 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 LOGAJSr V. PATRICK, 6 Cr. 388. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; citi- 
 zentiiip; auxiliary bills, a 
 
 a 10 Wall. 333, Jones v. Andrews. 
 a 22 Wail. 2.53, French v. Hay. 
 a 24 H. 460, Freeman v. Clarke. 
 
 I.EGER'WOOD, PICKETT v. See Pickett v. Legerwood. 
 liOMBABD, BAYAKD v. See Bayard v. Lombard. 
 lOMBARD, GRAHAM v. See Graham «. Lombard. 
 liONDON PACKET, THE, a Wll. 378. 
 
 Prizi? ; evidence, a | a 3 Wall. 459, The Sally Magee. 
 
 liONGAl*', CARPENTER v. See Carpenter v. Longan. 
 LONGEST, GORDON v. See Gordon v. Longest. 
 LONGWORTH, HINDE v. See Hinde v. Longwortb. 
 LONG'WORTH, TATLOR v. See Taylor v. Longworth. 
 LORD, MAYOR v. See Mayor v. Lord. 
 LORD V. VEAZIE, 8 H. 354. 
 
 Supreme Court; fictitious suits, a I a ] Bl. 425, Clev. v. Chamberlain. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 336, Paper Co. v. Heft. 
 
 LORING, EX PARTE, 94 U. S. 418. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandamus, a \a 98 U. S. 241, ex parte Schwab. 
 
 I a 102 U. S. 186, ex parte Perry. 
 LOTT, HINSON v. See Hinson «. Lott. 
 LOTTA WANNA, THE, 30 Wall. 801. 
 
 Admiralty; jurisdiction ; notice, as | a 23 Wall. 136, Kay v, Noseworthy 
 
 LOTTA WANNA, THE, 31 Wall. 571. 
 
 Admiralty; no maritime lien for | a 93 U. S. 365, Iforton v. Switzer. 
 services lo domestic vessel, a I 
 
 LOUGHBOROUGH v. BLAKE, 5 Wh. 317. 
 
 Constitution ; direct taxation in I a 7 Wall. 446, Ins. Co. u. Soule. 
 the territories, a \ 
 
 LOUISA R. R. CO., RICH. R. R. CO. v. See Rich. E. E. Co. v. R. E. Co. 
 LOUISIANA, THE, 3 WaU. 173. 
 
 Collision ; steamer and sailing I a 3 Wall. 313, The Granite State, 
 vessel; negligence, a \ 
 
 LOUISIANA, THE, v. FISHER, 31 H. 1. 
 
 Collision ; duties of steamships, a | o 13 Wall. 479, The Ariadne. 
 LOUISIANA, MORGAN v. See Morgan v. Louisiana. 
 LOUISIANA, NATHAN v.' See Nathan v. Lonisiana. 
 
 LOUISIANA NAT. BANK, SELMA & M. R. R. v. See Selma E. E. u. Bank. 
 LOUISVILLE MAN. CO. v. W^ELCH, 10 H. 461. 
 
 Guaranty, a | a 10 H. 203, Woodruff w. Trapnall. 
 
 LOUISVILLE R. R. CO. v. LETSON, 3 H. 497. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiotion where 
 a coi-poraUon is a party; citizen- 
 ship, a 
 
 Suit to enforce liens on land ; act 
 of 1839. (5 St. 321.) 6 
 
 a 16 H. 325, Marshall v. E. E. Co. 
 a 20 H. 231, Drawbridge Co. v. 
 
 Sheppard. 
 a 1 Bl. 295. E. E. v. Wheeler. 
 a 5 Wall. 542, Ins. Co. v. Eitchle. 
 a 7 Wall. 121, Cowles v. Mercer. 
 a 8 Wall. 178, Paul v. Virginia. 
 a 11 Wall. 216, Ins. Co. v. Franci.'*. 
 a 12 Wall. 82, K. E. Co. v. Harri.^ 
 a 18 Wall. 574, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 6 93 U. S. 205, Ober v. Galla;;her. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 171 
 
 liOVEJOT V. MCKKAY, 3 WaU. 18. 
 
 Ees judicata ; conclusiveness of 
 judgments, a 
 
 Lis pendens; when it can be 
 pleaded. 6 
 
 Joint tort feasors, c 
 
 a 4 Wall. 672, Bobbins v. Chicago 
 6 10 Wall. 218, The Kalorama. 
 a 92 U. S. 394, Sraeltzer v. White, 
 c 93 U. S. 315, Tlie Atlas, 
 c 95 U. S. 349, Sessions v. Johnson 
 
 LOVINGSTON, ST. CL.AIR v. See St. Clair v. LoTingston. 
 LOW, HUTCHINS V. See Hutohlns v. Low. 
 tow, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Low. 
 LOWNSDAIiE V. PARBISH, 81 H. 890. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter I a 3 Wall. 103, Sparrow v. Strong, 
 in dispute, a I 
 
 lOWKY, ERWTN V. See Erwin v. Lowry. 
 liOWItY, mvINE V. See Irvine i>. Lowry. 
 LUCAS T. BROOKS, 18 WaU. 436. 
 
 Supreme Court; error; objec- 
 tions must first be taken in the 
 court below, a 
 
 LUCAS, HAGAN v. See Hagan v. Lucas. 
 LUCAS, STKOTHEB v. See Strother v. Lucas. 
 LUCAS, TUT ANT v. See Tiffany v. Lucas. 
 LUCILLE, THE, 15 WaU. 679. 
 
 Collision ; rules of navigation, a | a 91 U 
 
 LUCO V. U. S., as H. 543. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; evi- 
 dence of grant, a 
 
 a 20 Wall. 418, Mays v. Frittoa. 
 
 S. 214, The Sunnyside. 
 
 a 24 H. 126, Palmer v. U. S. 
 a 24l H. 351, U. S. v. Castro. 
 a 1 Wall. 745, Komero «. U. S. 
 
 LUCT, THE, 8 WaU. 307. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appellate juris- I a 20 Wall. 620, Murdock O.Memphis 
 diction, a I 
 
 LUDELING, JACKSON v. See Jackson v. Lndeling. 
 LUDLOW V. KAMSET, 11 WaU. 681. 
 
 Judgments against parties absent I a 99 U. S. 489, Montgomery v. Sa- 
 
 within Confederate lines. 
 LULU, THE, 10 W^aU. 198. 
 
 Admiralty; lien of material-men ; 
 supplies furnished on credit of ves- 
 sel in foreign port, a 
 
 LUNT, SCOTT v. See Scott 1). Lunt. 
 LUPTON V. JANNET, 13 P. 381. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 
 LUTHEB V. BOBDEN, 7 H. 1. 
 
 U. S. courts ; force of State de- 
 cisions, a 
 
 Executive power ; when its action 
 is final, b 
 
 Martial law; powers of the 
 States, c 
 
 Constitution ; republican form of 
 government, a 
 
 mory. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 333, The Patapsco. 
 a 17 Wall. 669, The Emily Souder. 
 a 20 Wall. 164, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 a 20 Wall. 218, The Lottowanna. 
 
 a 8 H. 409, West v. Smith. 
 
 a 10 H. 532, E. Hartford v. Br. Co. 
 b 18 H. 285, Murray v. Hoboken. 
 c 4 Wall. 120, ex parte Millegan. 
 d 7 Wall. 730, Texas v. White. 
 6 13 Wall. 649, White v. Hart. 
 & 92 U. S. 132, Phillips v. Payne. 
 
172 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 HITZ V. I/INTHICUM,. 8 P. 175. 
 
 Awards ; umpire, a 
 Powers of court over, b 
 Objections to. c 
 
 LYIiB V. RODGERS, 5 Wh. 894. 
 
 Awards ; against administra- 
 trators. a 
 
 When award void. & 
 LYMAN, HOIiTOKB CO. v. See Holyoke Co. v. Lyman, 
 I.TMAN, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Lyman. 
 LYMAN V. OSBORNE, 11 Wall. 616. 
 
 Patent law; "inventions." a 
 
 a 5 H. 86, Canal Co. Swann. 
 6 18 H. 248, B. R. Co. v. Myers, 
 c 2 Wall. 131, Heckers v. Fowler. 
 
 a 1 P. 225, Karthaus v. Ferrer. 
 b IS H. 248, R. R. Co. v. Myers. 
 
 LYNCH V. BERNAIi, 9 Wall. 315. 
 
 Land titles ; doctrine of rela- 
 tion, a 
 
 California; Mexican titles; pu- 
 eblo lots. 6 
 LYNDE T. COUNTY, 16 Wall. 6. 
 
 Mnnlcipal and county railroad 
 bonds; recitals; conditions; bona- 
 fide holders ; estoppel, a 
 
 When subscription to stock of 
 railroad can be paid for in bonds. 6 
 
 a 92 U. S. 3.54, Reckendorfer v. 
 Faber. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 101, Gibson v. Chouteau 
 b 97 U. S. 283, Chamboya v. Um- 
 
 barger. 
 o 99 U. S. 16 1, Harris v. McGovein 
 
 a 21 Wall. 321, Cliambersu. Clews 
 
 a 94 U. S. 206, Com'rsB. January 
 
 a 97 TJ. S. 104, Warren v. Marcy. 
 
 a 97 XJ. S. 279, Macon v. Sliores. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 683, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 
 a 99 XJ. S. 686, Lyons v. Munson. 
 
 b 102 U. S. 631, Wells v. Super'rs. 
 
 LYNDE, tr. S. V. See U. S. ■!). Lynde. 
 LYNN, FINLAY T. See Finlay v. Lynn. 
 LYNN, SHRIVER v. See Shriver v. Lynn. 
 LYNN, YEATON v. See Yeaton v. Lynn. 
 LYTLE V. ARKANSAS, 9 H. 333. 
 
 Land officers; when their action 
 is final and exclu.-iive. a 
 
 Pre-emption ; when cancellation 
 of entry void. 6 
 
 Certificates of purchase ; equity, c 
 
 What rio;hts are acquired by mere 
 settlement and improvements, d 
 
 Eqnitable owners; when laud not 
 open to location. ■ e 
 
 LYTLE V. ARKANSAS, 88 H. 208. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error 
 to State courts ; Federal question, a 
 
 Registers and receivers; wlien 
 tlieir adjudications are final. 6 
 
 18 H. 43, Barnard v. Ashley. 
 20 H. 7, Garland v. Wynu. 
 22 H. 202, Lytle v. Arkansas. 
 1 B1.139, O'Brien v. Perry. 
 Wall. .56.5, U. S. v. Comra'r. 
 15 Wall. 88, Yosemite Case. 
 e 98 U. S. 121, Wirth v. Branson. 
 e 101 U. S. 261, Simmons v. Wag- 
 ner. 
 
 a 22 H. 338, Berthold v. McDonald. 
 a 1 B1.203, Maguire v. Tyler. 
 6 2 Bl. 5.59, Lindsey v. Hawes. 
 6 13 Wall. 85, Johnson v. Towsley. 
 
 MABEY, THE, 10 Wall. 367. 
 
 Supreme Court ; admiralty ap- i a 91 U. S. 367, The Juniata, 
 poals ; further evidence, a \ 
 
 MABEY AND COOPER, THE, 14 Wall. 311. 
 
 Collision ; tng and tow ; liability | a 97 U. S. 313, The Virginia Ehr- 
 to third party, a \ man. 
 
 MACA, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Maca. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 173 
 
 M'ATEE V. DOBEJIUS, 5 H. 63. 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatorj' force of I a 13 H. 186, Coffee v. Plant. Bank. 
 State decisions, a \ 
 
 MACAFEE, FUXTON v. See Fulton v. MacAfee. 
 McAKDREWS v. THATCHER, 3 Wall. 365. 
 
 General average, a ' a 9 Wall. 228, Star of Hope. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 117, Fowler v. Eath- 
 
 bones. 
 a 02 U. S. 400, Hob.on v. Lord. 
 
 McARTH^CB v. BROWDER, 4 WTl. 488. 
 
 Land titles ; when equity will go I a 13 Wall. 86, Johnson v. Towsley. 
 behind the patent, a \ 
 
 M' ARTHUR, BROWTJER v. See Browder v. M' Arthur. 
 McARTHXTR v. DUN, 7 H. 864. 
 
 Land laws ; entrys, snrvej's, and I a 1 Wall. 439, Niswanger v. Saun- 
 patents to dead men. a \ ders. 
 
 McARTHUR, HOBSON v. See Hobson v. McArthur. 
 McARTHTJR, RETNOtDS v. See Reynolds 1). McArthur. 
 McBIiAIR T. GIBBES, 17 H. 836. 
 
 Contract ; when illegality can be 
 
 shown as a defense, a 
 Executed contracts. 6 
 Notice of illegality, c 
 
 a 18 H. 293, Kineman v. Parkhurst 
 b 18 H. 508. McMickin v. Perrin. 
 a 23 H. 503, Gridley v. Wynant. 
 6 2 Wall. 81, Brooks u. Martin. 
 a 16 Wall. 500. Bank v. Bank, 
 c 95 U. S. 573, K. R. Co. v. Eurant 
 
 McBRrOE V. HOET, 11 P. 167. 
 
 Writ of error to State court ; I as 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 Federal question, a \ 
 
 McCABE T. WORTHINGTON, 16 H. 95. 
 
 Land titles ; confirmations of I a 101 U. S. 808, Trenier v. Stewart. 
 French and Spanish claims, a | 
 
 McCAjrN, SMITH v. See Smith d. McCann. 
 McCARDIiE, EX PARTE, 6 WaU. 324. ' 
 
 Supreme Conrt ; habeascorpus. a\a 7 Wall. 514, ex parte McCardle. 
 Appellate jurisdiction. 6 I 6 18 Wall. 166, ea; parte Lange. 
 
 McCARDLE, EX PARTE, 7 Wall. 618. 
 
 Supreme Court; habeascorpus. a\a 8 Wall. 103, ex parte Yerger. 
 
 Jnrisdiction ; repeal; pending a 18 Wall. 166, esjorar^e Lange. 
 
 cases, b I 6 98 U. S. 401,. K. B. Co. v. Grant. 
 
 McCARGO V. CHAPMAN, 80 H. 555. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandamus, u. | a 94 U. S. 350, ex parte Flippin. 
 
 McCARTER, JEROME v. See Jerome v. McCarter. 
 McCarthy, rail way CO. v. see Eailway Co. v. McCarthy. 
 
 Mccarty v. roots, ai h. 438. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; holders for a 102 U. S. 24, E. E. Co. v. Bank, 
 value ; collateral security for ante- 
 cedent debt, a 
 
 McCLBLtAN, COEIEtD v. See Cofleld v. MoCleUan. 
 M'CtCNG, MEIGS v. See Meigs v. M'Olung. 
 
174 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BTCltlNG T. BOSS, 6 WIi. 116. 
 
 Adverse possession ; co-tenants, a 
 Tax titles, h 
 
 M'CltlNT T. SELMMAIf, 6 Wh. 598 
 
 Writ of error to State court ; opin- 
 ion no part of record, o 
 
 Mandamus by State court to Fed- 
 eral officer. 6 
 
 By U. S. courts generally, c 
 
 a 5 P. 430, Bradstreet v. Hnnt'toii 
 <js 3 H. 687, Clymer ». Dawkins. 
 6 16 H. 615, Early v. Doe. 
 
 6 P. 41, Davis v. Packard. 
 
 12 P. 608, Kendall v. U. S. 
 3 Wall. 238, Ter. w. Lockvrood. 
 6 Wall. 189, Rigors W.Johnson. 
 
 13 Wall. 249, Bath Co. v. Amj-. 
 19 Wall. 660, Heine v. Com'rs. 
 
 c 102 tJ. S. 393, U. S. V. Schurz. 
 
 a 9 H. 413, Townsend v. Jemisoii. 
 6 2 BI. 603. Leffingwell w. Warren. 
 6 6 Wall. 537, Hanger v. Abbott. 
 a 13 Wall. 256, U. S. v. Wilder. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 91, Bates Co. v. Winters. 
 
 McCtUNT V. SnXtMAN, 3 P. 876. 
 
 Statutes of limitations; law of 
 the forum ; construction, a 
 
 U. S. courts; obligatory force of 
 State decisions. 6 
 
 McCtUBE T. OXTOBD, 94 U. S. 489 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; want of power; bona-fide 
 holdei-s; recitals, a 
 
 McCtUBE, BAILROAI) CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. MoOlure. 
 McCtUEG V. KINGSIiAUB, 1 H. 802. 
 
 Patents; meaning of "the thing 
 patented." a 
 
 ''Invention;" "discovery." 6 
 Public use. c 
 
 Mccoi,i,um: t. eageb, a h. 64. 
 
 Louisiana ; practice of U.S. courts 
 in; distinction between law and 
 equity must be preserved, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees. 6 
 
 a 4 H. 673, Wilson u. Rousseau. 
 6 1 Wall. 568, Burr v. Duryee. 
 c 7 Wall. 607, Agagam u. jordon. 
 c 94 Wall. 94, Jar Co. ». Wright. 
 
 a 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 h 18 H. 86, Verden v. Coleman. 
 a 12 Wall. 442, Walker v. Drevllle. 
 a 20 Wall. 622, Murdock» Memphis 
 h 23 Wall. 288, Thomas v. World- 
 ridge. 
 
 McCOMB V. COMMISSIONEBS, 91 TJ. S. 1. 
 
 Supreme Court; final decrees, a la 92 U. S. 179, Baker v. White. 
 
 I a 94 U. S. 517, Davis ». Croueli. 
 McCOKTNEI,!,, HAMPTON v. See Hampton v. MoConnell 
 McCOimEIil/ T. LEXINGTON, 18 Wh. 588. 
 
 Dedication, a a G P. 433, Cincinnati u. White. 
 
 a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Chicago. 
 
 a 9 H. 25, Irwin u. Dixion. 
 McCONNEtl, WAHACE v. See Wallace d. McConnell 
 McCOOI. V. SMITH, 1 Bl. 471. 
 
 Statutes ; repeal by implication, a a 5 Wall. 708, Galena ». Amy. 
 
 Effect of acquiring title after 6 7 Wall. 272, Litchfield «. R. R. 
 commencement of action. 6 a 96 U. S. 140, Arthur ■o. Homer. 
 
 McCOEMICK, PtJGH v. See Push v. McCormiok 
 McCOKMICK, SEYMOUB v. See Seymour v. MoOormick 
 McCOBMICK V. SCIMVANT, 10 P. 803. 
 
 Disposition of real property gov- 
 erned by lex rei sites, a 
 
 Juiisdiction of inferior courts of 
 the U. S. 6 
 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor ». Benham. 
 0! H. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 6 8 H. 605, Kennedy v. Bank. 
 a 94 U. S. 320, U. S. u. Pox. 
 a 96 U. S. 635, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 175 
 
 Mccormick v. taibot, 20 h. 405. 
 
 Patent law; "equivalents." a I a 1 Wall. 573, Biu-r u. Daryee. 
 
 I a 2 Wall. 327, Case v. Brown, 
 McCOmX, SNBAD v. See Snead v. McCoull. 
 McCKACKEN V. HATWAI^D, 8 H. 608. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation ot con- 
 tracts ; remedy, a 
 
 a 6 H. 318, Biink v. Sharp. 
 a 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas. 
 a 24 H. 464, Howard v. Biigbee. 
 a 4 Wall. 550, Van Hoffman v. 
 
 Quincy. 
 a 8 Wall. 583, Butzu. Muscatine. 
 a 96 U. S. 601, Edwards v. Kear- 
 
 zey. 
 a 102 U. S. 419, Daniels D.Tearney 
 
 McCREAKT v. SOMERTUXE, 9 Wh. 354. 
 
 Alienage ; inheritable blood, a | a 18 H. 236, McKinney v. Saviego. 
 McCCE, PACKET CO. -v. See Packet Co. v. McOue. 
 
 Mcculloch v. MABTiiAMJ, 4 wii. 319. 
 
 Constitution ; power of Congress a 9 Wh. 816, Osborne. Bank U. S. 
 
 to charter the Bank of the U.S. a 
 
 Power of the States to legislate 
 
 on matters confided to the general 
 
 government, or to tax Instrument 
 
 employed by general government. 6 
 
 Taxation ; abuse of the power, c 
 
 Writs of error to State courts ; 
 
 return of the writ, d 
 
 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court 
 to declare laws unconstitutional, e 
 Power of Congress over the Ter- 
 ritories, f 
 Police power, g 
 Implied powers under the Con- 
 stitution, h 
 Taxation of corporations, i 
 Corporation; rights in other 
 States, i 
 
 b 12 Wh. 436, Brown v. Maryland. 
 6 2 P. 463, Weston v. Charleston, 
 c 4 P. 559, Bank v. Billings, 
 d 6 P. 536, Worcester v. Georgia, 
 e 6 P. 706, U. S. v. Arredondo. 
 e 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 f 14 P. 534, U. S. V. Gratiot. 
 /16 P. 443, Dobbins v. Com'rs. 
 6 5 H. 586, License Cases. (Opin. 
 
 of McLean, J.) 
 b 7 H. 392, Passenger Cas. (Opin. 
 
 of McLean, J.) 
 922 H. 243, Sinnot v. Davenport. 
 6 2 B1.628, Bank v. New York. 
 6 6 Wall. 45, Crandell v. Nevada 
 b 6 Wall. 605, Society v. Coit. 
 h 8 Wall. 614, Hepburn uGriswold 
 6 9 Wall. 360, Bank v. Comm'th. 
 b 9 Wall. 589, Thompson u. R. E. 
 6 11 Wall. 123, Collector v. Day. 
 i 11 Wall. 429, St.Louisu. Ferry Co 
 ^11 Wall. 507, Stewart v. Kahn. 
 6 12 Wall. 224, State Ton. Tax C.is, 
 6 12 Wall. 427, Ward v. Maryland. 
 h 12 Wall. 532, Legal-Tender Cas. 
 g 16 Wall. 64, .Slaughter-House 
 
 Cases. 
 6 18 Wall. 34, B. R. w. Peniston. 
 c 20 Wall. 663, Loan Ass. w.Topek;i 
 6 91 U. S. 33, Bank v. Bearing. 
 ;i91U. S. 373, Kohl «. U. S. 
 i 95 U. S. 687, Farringtonu.Tenn. 
 c 96 U. S. 602, Edwiards w Kearzey 
 c 97 U. S. 666, Pert. Co. v. Hyde. 
 6 99 U. S. 279, Tr. Co. u. Wheeling, 
 c 100 U. S. 497, Kirtland v. Hotch- 
 
 kiss. 
 6 100 U. S. 543, People v. Weaver. 
 c 102 U. S. 593, Springer v. U. S. 
 
176 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 McCUTCHEN V. MABSHAM,, 8 P. 340. 
 
 U. S. coiu-ts; obligatory force of l a Wall. 030, Prov. Inst. v. Mass. 
 State decisions, a \ 
 
 McDANIBI., V. S. T. See U. S. v. McDaniel. 
 
 McDONATD V. MAGBUDEB, 3 P. 474. 
 
 Negotiable paper; prior indorser; I a 5 H. 23S, Pliillips v. Preston, 
 contribution by co-sureties, a. | a 21 H. 437, McCarty v. Roots. 
 
 McDONAlD V. SMAI.LEY, 1 P. 680, 
 
 U. S. courts; conveyances for 
 the purpose of giving jurisdic- 
 tion, a 
 
 Equity practice of U. S. courts ; 
 rules prescribed by Sup. Court. 6 
 
 Exceptions not taken below can- 
 not be considered by Sup. Court, c i 
 
 McDonald v. smailet, 6 p. aei 
 
 Land laws; patents to dead 
 men. a 
 
 a 7 H. 215, Smith v. Kernochen. 
 6 19 H. 73, Betts v. Lewis. 
 c 3 Wall. 423, De Sobry v. Nichol- 
 son. 
 a 6 Wall. 288, Barney v Baltimore 
 a 9 Wall. 123, Cheev«r v. Wilson. 
 
 a 12 P. 294, (Jalloway v. Finley. 
 a 7 H. 266, McArthur v. Dunn. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 427, Davenport v. Lamb 
 MACDONAID, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Maodonald. 
 
 Mcdonough v. dannbet. 3 Daii. 198. 
 
 Supreme Court ; only party ap- I a 9 Wall. 511, The Gray Eagle, 
 pealing can assign errors, a \ 
 
 Mcdonough, KEENE v. see Keene 1). MoDonough. 
 
 Mcdonough v. mhiandon, 3 h. 693. 
 
 Writs of error to State court ; 
 
 Feder.il question, a 
 Citation; waiver; jurisdiction. 6 
 Louisiana land titles; Spanish 
 
 grant; boundaries, c 
 
 a 7 H. 590, Kennedv v. Hunt, 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe «. Eslava. 
 6 13 H. 150, Buckingham 1) McLean 
 c 15 H. 32, U. S. V. Boselins. 
 a 20 H. 522, Moreland v. Page. 
 a 4 Wall. 210, Lanfear v. Himley 
 6 20 Wall. 8, Habich v. Folger. 
 
 Mcdonough v. muedoch, is h. 367. 
 
 Charitable devises, a 
 
 a 24 H. 505, Perin v. Carj'. 
 
 Mcdonough, u. s. v. see u. s. v. Eoseiius. 
 
 McbOWELt, GEISAB v. See Grisar v. McDowell. 
 McELMOTTiE v. COHEN, 13 P. 318. 
 
 Limitations; when the statute 
 afifects remedy only ; lex fori, a 
 
 Constitutionality of statutes barr- 
 ing suits on judgments. 6 
 
 Judgments ; "faith and credit to 
 be given to "; notice, e 
 
 McEWEN V. DEN, 84 H. 843. 
 
 Statutes; retroactive operation, a 
 
 a 9 H. 413, Townsend v. Jemison. 
 6 9 H. 526, Bank v. Dalton. 
 c 17 H. 338, Booth v. Clark, 
 c 20 H. 23, Bacon v. Howard. 
 a 5 Wall. 300, Christmas w Russell 
 c 18 Wall. 463, Tliompson v. Whit- 
 man, 
 c 95 U. S. 729, Pennoyer v. Neff. 
 a 98 U. S. 471, Amy v. Dubuque. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 187, Twenty p. ct. Cas. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIO:^S. 
 
 177 
 
 aPFADON, CBOWEll v. See Crowell v. M'Fadon. 
 UrrADON, THE EXCHANGE v. See Exchange, The, v. M'Fadon. 
 BrFAKlAND, L.EWIS v. See Lewis v. M'Farland. 
 MTAUI. V. KAMSET, 83 H. 535. 
 
 U. S. courts ; jiu'isdictioii in eqiii- ■ a 23 H. 486, Green v. Custard, 
 ty and common lavv mu^t be kept a 1 Bl. 314, Farni v. Tesson. 
 ili.-tinct ; State codes, a I 
 
 McFEKKAN V. TAYLOR, 3 Cr. 281. 
 
 Misrepresentation, a | a 13 P. 30, Smitli v. Riciiards. 
 
 McGAKKAHAJS^ v. MINING CO., 93 U. S. 31G. 
 
 Land; patents; execution of. a \ a 101 TJ. S. G98, Antliony v. Jasper 
 
 McGAHKAHAN, SECKBTAKT v. See Secretary v. McGarrahan. 
 McGAVOCK V. ■WOODLIEF, 80 H. 885. 
 
 Louisiana ; writ of error to Su- 1 a 22 H. 72, Kock v. Emmerling. 
 preme Court ; statement'of facts, a \ 
 
 McGEE v. MATHIS, 4 TVaU. 143. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; exemption from taxation, a 
 
 a 8 Wall. 438, Home v. Kouse. 
 a 13 Wall. 376, Salt Co. v. Saginaw. 
 a 21 Wall. 498, R. R. Co. v. Penn. 
 
 McGILL V. ABMOTIB, 11 H. 151. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction between I a 18 H. 504, Bank v. Jolly. 
 State and Federal courts, a \ 
 
 McGHX V. BANK OF U. S., 18 "Wi. 614. 
 
 Appeal bond ; sureties, a 
 
 McGOON V. SCALES, 9 A¥all. 83. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; void and voidable 
 judo;ments. a 
 Appearance of corporations. 6 
 Real property; transfer regula- 
 ted by the law of the place, c 
 
 I a 12 H. 163, Ives v. Mereh. Bank. 
 
 I a 20 H. 76, Leggett v. Humpliroys 
 
 a 10 Wall. 316. Cooper u. Reynolds 
 6 20 Wall. 7, Habioh v. Folger. 
 c 96 U. S. 636, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 
 M'GBAN, BKOWN v. See Brovm v. M'Gran. 
 M'GRUDEB V. BANK. OF "WASHINGTON, 9 Wh. 598. 
 
 Negotiable paper; notice; due | a 10 P. 573, Dickens!^. Beall. 
 diligence, a I 
 
 McGUIBE V. COMMONWEALTH, 3 Wall. 385. 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error 
 to State courts ; direction, a 
 
 Within wliat tiiiie writ of error 
 must be allowed and served to ope- 
 rate as a supersdeas. 6 
 
 Federal question, c 
 
 a 3 Wall . 450;. Gtreen v. Van Bus- 
 kirk. 
 6 10 Wall.. 291, Slaughter-Ho u se 
 
 Cases. 
 a 91 U: S. 147, Atherton I) Fowler 
 c 93 U. S. 121, Ins. Co. v. Council 
 c 102 U. S. 418, Daniels v. Tearney 
 
 McILVLINE V. COXE, 4 Cr. 811. 
 
 Aliens; election on the Bevolu 
 tion. a 
 Allegiance ; change of. 6 
 
 M'INTIKE, MXLLEB v. See Miller n. M'Intire 
 12 
 
 a 3 P. 112, Inglis v. Trustees. 
 b 20 H. 1 7, Jones v. McMasters. 
 a 20 H. 246, White v. Burnley. 
 
178 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 M'INTIRE V. WOOD, 7 Cr. 604. 
 
 Miiiidamiis to Federal officers, a 
 
 Judicial power of the U. S.; pow- 
 er of Congress over. 6 
 
 Mandamus ; power of U. S. 
 courts, c 
 
 Circuit Court can exercise no ju- 
 risdiction except that conferred by 
 Congress, d 
 
 a 6 Wh. 598, McClunyw. Silliman. 
 a 12 P. 608, Kendall v. U. S. 
 b 8 H. 448, Sheldon !). Hill, 
 c 6 Wall. 189, Kiggs v. Johnson. 
 d 6 Wall. 488, U. S. v. Eckfoi-d. 
 a 7 Wall. 349, Gaines v Thompsoii 
 c 9 Wall. 311, Sec'ywMcGarrahan 
 d 9 Wall. 573, Assessor v. Osboi'ii. 
 c 13 Wall. 249, Bath Co. v. Amy. 
 d 18 Wall. 577, Sew. Ma. Co. Case: 
 c 19 Wall. 660, Heine v. Com'rs. 
 C102U. S. 392, U. S. v. Sohurz. 
 
 M'INTOSH, JOHNSON v. See Johnson v. M'Intosh, 
 M'lVEB V. BAGAN, a Wh. 25. 
 
 Boundaries, a 
 
 Statutes; where Legislature 
 makes no exceptions, courts can 
 make none, b 
 
 Adverse possession ; ouster, c 
 
 McIVER T. W^AIiKEB, 9 Cr. 173. 
 
 Land; patents; validity and ef- 
 fect, u, 
 
 a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 6 21 H. 23S, French v. Spenser. 
 b 6 Wall. 542, Hanger v. Abbott, 
 c 14 Wall. 146, Armstrong v, Mor- 
 rill. 
 
 a 4 Wh. 444, Mclver v. Walker. 
 a 3 H. 190, Croghan v. Nelson. 
 
 I a 2 Bl. 504, Noonan v. Lee. 
 
 McrVER V. WAI.KEB, 4 Wll. 445. 
 
 Deeds ; reference to plats, a 
 
 McIVEB V. WATTIES, 9 Wh. 650. 
 
 Supreme Court; costs; dismissal I a 9 Wall. 567, Hornthall v. CoU'r. 
 for want of jurisdiction, a 
 
 MLACKAY \ 
 
 Missouri ; 
 tions. a 
 
 EASTON, 19 WaU. 633. 
 
 New Madrid loea- I a 92 U. S. 713, Hot Springs Cases. 
 
 McKEE V. tr. S., 8 WaU. 163. 
 
 Civil war; status of the Confed- | a 21 Wall, 
 erate States, a \ 
 
 McKEEN T. DB LANCET, 5 Cr. 38. 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatory force of 
 State decisions, a 
 Registration of mortgages. 6 
 
 6, Hamilton v. Dillon 
 
 McKENNA V. FISK, 1 H. 846. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction where 
 trespass was committed out of the 
 United States ; action transitory, a 
 
 MACKET T. eOXE, 18 H. 103. 
 
 Indians ; authority of U. S. over, a 
 
 MACB:EY v. BZLION, 4 H. 445. 
 
 Missouri ; grant of St. Louis com- 
 mon, a 
 
 Perfect titles ; when courts bound 
 by action of political department, b 
 
 a 12 Wh. 161. Jackson v. Chew. 
 
 a 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 
 a 6 P. 706, U. S. v. Arrcdondo. 
 
 6 4 H. 51, Beals v. Hale. 
 
 a 14 H. 496, Webster v. Cooper. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 82, Supervisors v. U.S. 
 
 a 13 H. 128, Mitchell v. Harmony. 
 
 I a 11 Wall. 619, Cherokee Tobacco. 
 
 a 4 H. 456, Les Bois v. Bramel. 
 6 7 H. 590, Kennedy v. Hunt. 
 a 8 II. 330, Bissell v. Penrose. 
 a 16 H. 507, Guitard v. Stoddard. 
 14 Wall. 313, Dent v. Emmerger 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 179 
 
 McKTM: t. TOOKHEES, I Cr. 879. 
 
 U. S. courts ; iojunction by State 
 court, a 
 
 McKINUET T. MORBISH, 81 H. 343. 
 
 o 1 H. 304, Duncan v. Darst. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 194, Eiggs v. Johnson Co 
 
 a 6 Wall. 517, U. S. v. Keokuk. 
 
 Admiralty ; in whose name libel 
 should be filed, a 
 
 a 10 Wall. 11, The Blackwell. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 109, The Thames. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 266, Vaughan v. The 
 Telegraph. 
 
 McKTNXBY, SHEKKT v. See Sherry v. McKinley. 
 McKDOJET V. CARRO!.!., 13 P. 66. 
 
 Writs of error to State courts ; 
 how the Federal question must ap- 
 pear, a 
 
 McKEOfET T. SAVTEGO, 18 H. 835. 
 
 Texas land titles ; Mexican colon- 1 
 ization laws, a \ 
 
 McKKIGHT V. TATXOK, 1 H. 168. 
 
 Equity ; stale claims, a i 
 
 a 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 a 7 H. 590, Kennedy v. Hunt. 
 
 a 7 H. 740, Smith v. Hnnter. 
 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe ». Eslava. 
 
 a 15 H. 305, Currau v. Armstrong, 
 
 a 20 H. 17, Jones v. McMastefs. 
 a 98 U. S. 496, Airhart v. Massieu. 
 
 McI.A2«^AHAN V. UNIVEKSAI, INS 
 
 Insurance ; representations, a 
 Charge ; province of jui-y. 6 
 Error ; refusal to grant new trial 
 not assignable for error, c 
 
 I a 8 H. 218, Maxwell v. Kennedy. 
 I a 99 U. S. 211, Godden v. Kimmell 
 
 CO., 1 p. 185. 
 
 a 8 H. 245, Clark v. lus. Co. 
 6 13 H. 128, Mitchell v. Harmony, 
 c 1 Wall. 598, Pomeroy u. Bank. 
 6 95 U. S. 238, Ins. Co. v. Rodel. 
 
 McIiANE V. U. S., 6 P. 404. 
 
 Collectors ; penalties and forfeit- j a 10 H. 132, Hoyt v. U. S. 
 ures ; when right to accrues, a | 
 
 MctEAN, BUCKINGHAM v. See Buckingham v. McLean. 
 BIcIlEAN, MAIISTEI,I,EB T. See MarsteUer v. McLean. 
 MclEAN, V. S. V. See U. S. i;. McLean. 
 MclEMOBE V. POWEIil,, 13 Wh. 554. 
 
 t 
 
 dis- 
 
 a 6 P. 254, Bank U. S. v. Hatch. 
 a 5 H. 204, Creath v. Sims. 
 b 16 Wall. 566, Specht v. Howard. 
 a 22 Wall. 587, Boss v. Jones. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice ; 
 charge of indorser. a 
 
 Parol evidence of oral agree- 
 ment. 6 
 
 MclEMOKE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. McLemore. 
 McMASTEBS, JONES v. See Jones v. MoMasters. 
 MciraCK EN V. PEKIN, 18 H. 607. 
 
 Attorney; purchase of interest 
 in property after judgment ; when 
 he will be held a trustee, a 
 
 Master's reports : exceptions. 6 
 
 McMICKEN V. PEKIN, 30 H. 135. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandate ; exe- , 
 cution of ; second writ of error, a | 
 
 McMICKEN V. WEBB, 6 H. 396. 
 
 Sureties, a \a2 Wall. 236, Smith v. U. S. 
 
 McMillan -v. andebson, 95 u. s. 37. 
 
 Constitution ; " due process of I a 96 U. S. 105, Davidson v. N. Orl. 
 law." a 1 
 
 a 20 H. 133, McMicken v. Perin. 
 a 22 H. 283, McMicken v. Perin. 
 b 100 D. S. 527, Mt. Pleasant v. 
 Beckwith. 
 
 I a 11 Wall. 674, Cook v. Burnley. 
 
180 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 McMillan v. mcneh.!, 4 wh. ao9. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; law disoharging' debtor from 
 debts contracted previous to dis- 
 charge ; discliarge by foreign banli- 
 rupt law, when no bar. a 
 
 IttcNErLL V. HOI.BBOOK, 13 P. 85, 
 
 Evidence; State statutes; wlien 
 U. S. courts will follow decisions of 
 the State courts as a rule of decis- 
 ion, a 
 
 a 6 Wh. l.?4, Bank «. Smith. 
 
 a 12 Wh. 213, Ogden v. Saunders. 
 
 a 5 H. 307, Cook v. Moflfat. 
 
 a H. 318, Bank v. Shaip. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 228, Baldwin u. Hale, 
 
 a 11 H. 490, Conrad v. Griffey. 
 a 1 Bl. 428, Vance v. Campbell. 
 a 2 Bl. 537, Wright v. Bales. 
 a 102 U. S. 165, Potter v. Bank. 
 
 McNEILI., M:cMIL,r,AN v. See McMillan v. MeNeUl. 
 
 McNEZLl, EX PARTE, 13 TFaU. 83G. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 222, Davis v. Gray. 
 
 6 17 Wall. 568, K. E. v. Fuller, 
 
 c 21 Wall. 582, The Lottavvanna. 
 
 b 91 U. S. .34, Bank v. Dearinff. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 137, Claflin v. Houie- 
 
 man. 
 
 6 94 U. S. 242, S. S. Co. v. Tinker. 
 
 d 94 U. S. 248, Foster v. TS. Orl. 
 
 U. S. courts ; remedy given by 
 State law. a 
 
 Constitution ; concurrent pow- 
 ers, h 
 
 Pilotage, c 
 
 Inspection and quarantine laws, d 
 
 States cannot confer jurisdiction 
 on U. S. courts, e 
 
 McNITT V. TtTBNEB, 16 WaU. 366. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 Bills of exceptions. 6 
 
 McNTJXTT v. BATTY, 10 Bt. 78. 
 
 Territories ; writs of error to the 
 Supreme Court ; abatement by ad- 
 mission of as State, a 
 
 Eepeal of law; pending cases. & 
 
 McNUTT M. BI/AUrD, 8 H. 88. 
 
 Sheriffs ; suits against, a 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; suits 
 between citizens different States. 6 
 Nominal parties, c 
 
 94 U. 
 94 U. 
 96 U. 
 
 S. 377, ex parte Soholen- 
 bei'ger. 
 
 a 96 IT. S. 635, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 401, Smith v. E. E. Co. 
 
 c 102 U. S. 574, Wilson v. McSTa- 
 mee. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 250, Cornettc. Williams 
 6 98 U. S. 284, Beckwith v. Bean. 
 
 a 10 H. 82, Preston v. Bracken. 
 6 98 U. S. 401, Eailroad v. Grant. 
 
 MACON CO. V. SHORES, 
 
 County bonds in aid of railroads ; 
 '""*' "two-thirds of legal vot- 
 
 c 101 U 
 97 U. S. 873. 
 
 a99U. 
 
 21 H. 70, Le^ett v. Humphreys 
 11 Wall. 176, Coal Co. v Blatch- 
 
 ford. 
 13 Wall. 67, Eice v. Houston. 
 20 Wall. 123, Knapp v. E. E. 
 
 8. 589, Walden v Skinner 
 
 elections 
 ers." a 
 
 McPHEESON T. COX, 96 V. S. 404. 
 
 Statute of frauds; contracts not 
 to be performed within a year, a 
 McOTJEWAN, BLOOMEE v. See Bloomer v. MeQuewan 
 McBOBEETS. CAMAEON v. See Oamaron v. McRoberte. 
 McSHANE, E. E. CO. v. See E. E. Go. v. McShane. 
 McSTEA, MATTHEWS v. See Matthews v. MoStea 
 
 220, Supervisors v. Gal- 
 braith. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 427, Walker ». Johnson. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 181 
 
 McVeigh, Gregory v. see Gregory «. MoVeigU. 
 
 McVeigh t. ts. s., ii "Wau. aea. 
 
 Confiscation ; right of alien en- 
 <;vay to appear and defend ; judg- 
 nient without hearing, a 
 
 a 11 Wall. 292, Miller v. U. S. 
 a 17 Wall. 438, LasereuEoohereau 
 a 18 Wall. Ill, University v. Finch 
 a 93 U. S. 277, Windsor u McVeigh 
 
 McVeigh, Windsor v. see Windsor u. McVeigh. 
 
 MADISON, MAKBURT v. See Marbnry v. Madison. 
 
 MADISON, VAlf HOSTROP v. See Van Hostrop v. Madison. 
 
 MADRAXO V. GEORGIA, 1 P. 110. 
 
 Suit against a State ; process, a j a 24 II. 95, Kentucky v. Dennison. 
 
 MAGER V. GBIMA, 8 H. 490. 
 
 Tax by State on legacies, a I a 23 H. 447, Frederickson v. Louis- 
 
 I iana. 
 
 MAGGIE HAMMOND, THE, 9 Wall. 456. 
 
 Adrairaltj' ; liens ; process, a j a 20 Wall. 163, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 Wharfage. 6 1 6 95 U. S. 76, ex parte Easton. 
 
 MAGNIAC V. THOMPSON, 7 P. 389. 
 
 Instructions to the jury, a | a 99 U. S. 659, Spring Co. v. Edgar. 
 
 MAGNIAC V. THOMSON, 15 H. 396. 
 
 Equity ; relief ; fraud ; liow it | a 16 Wall. 29, Voorhees v. Bonesteel 
 must be alleged, a I 
 
 MAGNOtlA, THE, JACKSON v. See Jackson v. The Magnolia. 
 MAGRUDER, DRUBDIOND t. See Drummond v. Magrnder. 
 MAGKTJDER, McDONAXD v. See McDonald v. Magrnder. 
 MAGRUDER V. UNION BANK, 3 P. 87. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; demand and 
 notice, a 
 
 a 4 P. 380, Bank U. S. v. Tyler. 
 a 7 P. 287, Bank». Magruder. 
 a 10 H. 574, Dickens v. Beall. 
 a 100 U. S. 712, Cox v. Nat. Bank. 
 
 MAGRUDER, UNION BANK v. See Union Bank v. Magruder. 
 MAGUIRE T. CARD, 21 H. 349. 
 
 Admiralty; maritime contracts, o | a 7 Wall, 642, The Belfast. 
 MAGUIRE, PACIFIC R. K. v. See Pacific E. E. v. Maguire. 
 MAGUIRE, TRASK v. See Trask v. Maguire. 
 MAGWIRE, BAII/EY v. See Biilej- v. Magwire. 
 MAGWIRE, RIGGIN v. See Riggin v. Magwire. 
 MAGWIRE V. TVI/ER, 1 BL 199. 
 
 Missouri land titles ; powei- of 
 Sec. of Interior to recall patent, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court; Federal question, b 
 
 MAGWIRE V. TYtER, 8 WaU. 650. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 664, Magwire ». Tyler. 
 6 17 Wall. 280, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 263, Klingerr. Missouri. 
 b 17 Wall. 278. Tyler v. Magwire. 
 c 98 U. S. 211, Snyder v. Sickles. 
 
 Supreme Comt ; writs of error to 
 State coiu-ts ; Federal question, a 
 
 Missouri ; incomplete titles. 6 
 
 Land Office ; surveys, c 
 MAHEEEY, SAN ANTONIO v. See San Antonio v. Malieffy. 
 MAHONE, ENS. CO. v. See Ins. Co. u. Mahone. 
 
182 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPEEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 MATL CO. V. EXANDBKS, 18 Wall. 135. 
 
 Supreme Court; may reverse 
 where court below has proceeded 
 without jurisdictiou. a 
 
 MAItLAKD V. LAWKESrCE, 16 H. 256. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 162, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 
 Duties; construction of statutes 
 Imposing duties, a 
 
 MADTE, KAILBOAD CO. v. See Eailroad Co, 
 MAI.AitIN V. TJ. 8., 1 WaU. 2S». 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; de- 
 livery of possession, a 
 Appeals from District Court. 6 
 
 MAUEDK ADHEL, THE, TJ. 8. v. See U. S. 
 MAX-ET M. SHATT0CK, 3 Cr. 458. 
 
 a 96 U. S. Ill, Arthurs. Morrison. 
 a 101 U. S. 284, Greenleaf v. Good- 
 rich. 
 Maine. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 261, Graham v. U. S. 
 b 6 Wall. 37G, Grisar v. McDowell. 
 
 , The Malek Adhel. 
 
 a 10 Wh. 484, Maiiro v. Almeida. 
 h 2 Wall. 479, The Baigorry. 
 
 Admiralty; maritime torts, a 
 
 Enemy's property; attempt to 
 violate blockade, b 
 MAIIjEXT, FOXCBOFT v. See Foxcratt v. Mallett. 
 MAXIiON V. HINDE, 18 Wli. 193. 
 
 Equity ; parties, a i a 1 P. 243, FindLiy v. Hinde. 
 
 a 12 P. 359, Story u. Livingston. 
 
 a 17 H. 139, Shields v. Barrow. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 285, Barney v. Baltimore 
 MANCHBSTEB BANK v. BUCKNEB.- See Commercial Banki). Buckner. 
 MANI>EL,BAUM v.. THE PEOPLE, 8 "Wall. 513. 
 
 Error ; striking out valid an- | a 16 Wall. 165, Garnharts v. TT. S. 
 swer. a 
 
 MAJfDIEVIIXE v. BUBT, 8 P. 866. 
 
 Supreme Court; reversal with 
 
 I a 93 U. S. IG, Fuller v. Claflin. 
 
 leave to produce further proof, a 
 
 a 2 Wall. 195, Chittenden v. Brew- 
 ster. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 227. May v. Le Claire. 
 MAlNDEVILI.E, BUBWEU. v. See Burwell v. Mandeville. 
 MAISBEVIIXE V. BIDDLE, 1 Cr. 298. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; rights of liolder 1 a 5 Cr. 328, Kiddle v. Manderville. 
 of note against a remote indorser. a | a 2 P. 347, Bank v. Weisiger. 
 MANDEVUXE, KIDDnE v. See Riddle v. MandeTille. 
 MANDEVnXE v. BIGGS, 2 P. 482. 
 
 Supreme Court ; form of revei'sal 
 where, in several litigations, one 
 only has been proceeded in. a 
 
 Jurisdiction ; notice ; service by 
 publication. 6 
 
 MANDBVUiiE, SHEEHT v. See Sheehy v. MandeTiUe. 
 MANDEVrLLE v. WELCH, 5 Wll. Vtt. 
 
 a '8 P. 257, Mandeville v. Burt. 
 6 24 H. 206, Nations v. Johnson. 
 
 Contracts; power of persons 
 claiming a moiety to sue. a 
 
 Assignments of funds ; accept- 
 ance of draft. 6 
 
 U. S. conrts; when they follow 
 tlie decisions of the State courts, c 
 
 MANDEVILLE, WELCH v 
 
 a 5 P. 390, Shankland v Wash'gton 
 6 5 P. 592, Tiernan v. Jackson, 
 c 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 
 See Welch i;. Mandeville. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 183 
 
 SIANDETILIE v. WILSON, 5 Cr. 15 
 
 Error; refusal to allow amoucl- 
 mont not assignable for ei-ror. a 
 Limitations ; accounts current. 6 
 
 MAJJfET, EX P^IKTE, 14 H. 34. 
 
 Supreme Court ; maudamus 
 
 a 
 
 MJLNEO V. AiaEEEDA, 10 Wh. 473. 
 
 Admiralty jurisclictioii; suits in 
 rem ; service, a 
 Process. 6 
 
 Attachment ; of credits ; notice, c 
 Admiralty procedure, d 
 
 a 5 Cr. 357, Moss v. Riddle. 
 6 6 P. 160, Spring v. Gray. 
 a 11 Wall. 676, Cook v. Burnley. 
 
 a 14 "Wall. 166, ex parte Newman. 
 a 101 U. S. 720, ex parte R. B. Co. 
 
 MANlTACTPKraG CO. 
 MANUFACTUKrsrG CO. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 581, Propeller Commerce. 
 
 6 2 Bl. 440, Ward v. Chamberlain 
 
 a 7 Wall. 642, The Belfast. 
 
 c 11 Wall. 297, Miller v. U. S. 
 
 6 18 Wall. 303, Atkins v. Disinte- 
 grating Co. 
 
 d 95 U. S. 611, The Wanata. 
 
 d 99 U. S. 36, U. S. v. Ames. 
 K. R. CO. V. See E. K. Co. v. Manufacturing Co. 
 V. U. S., 17 "Wall. 593. 
 
 U. S.; ciintracts with ; damages, a 
 MJINT, SIZEK V. See Sizer v. Many. 
 MABBUKT V. BROOKS, 7 "VVli. SSB. 
 
 Debtors ; preferences ; deeds of 
 trust . a 
 
 Assio-[inients; when assent of 
 creditors presumed. 6 
 
 J*tARBURT, BROOKS v. See Brooks v. Marbnry. 
 MARBURT V. MADISON, 1 Cr. 153. 
 
 Supreme Court ; original and 
 appellate jurisdiction, a 
 
 Executive officers ; power 
 courts over. 6 
 
 Mandamus, c 
 
 Ministerial duties, d 
 
 a 94 U. S. 217, U. S. v. Smith. 
 
 a 11 Wh. 78, Brooks v. Marbury. 
 a 16 P. 113, Tompkins v. Wheeler 
 ^ 8 H. 438, Grove v. Brien. 
 
 of 
 
 4 Cr. 100, exparte Bolman. 
 6 Wh. 375, Cohens v. Virginia. 
 6 Wh. 598, McCluny?; Silliman 
 
 6 P. 729, "U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 
 7 P. 572, ex parte Watkins. 
 12 P. 617, Kendall v. U. S. 
 
 5 H. 186, ex parte Metzger. 
 11 H. 291, Keeside v. Walker. 
 
 1 Wall. 252, ex parte "Vallandi- 
 gham. 
 a 3 "Wall. 254, Daniels v. E. R. 
 d 4 Wall. 498, Miss. v. Johnson. 
 a 5 Wall. 412, The Wm. Bagaley 
 a 6 Wall. 188, Riggs v. Johnson. 
 6 7 Wall. 349, Gaines v. Thomp- 
 son, 
 c 8 Wall. 97, ex parte Yerger. 
 c 14 Wall. 165, ex parte Newman, 
 c 16 Wall. 270, IJis. Co. v. Corn- 
 stock. 
 c 17 Wall. 609, U. &. v. Boutwell. 
 a 100 U. S. 341, ex parte "Virginia. 
 d 102 U. S. 395, U. S. v. Schurz. 
 MARBURY, TWIN tlCK OIL CO. v. See Twin Lick Oil Co. -ii. Marbury. 
 MAKCABDIER v. CHESAPEAKE INS. CO., 8 Cr. 39. 
 
 Mai-ine insurance; total loss. 
 Charter parties. 6 
 Charterei's ; liability, c 
 
 a 1 Wh. 224, Moreau v. Ins. Co. 
 6 11 Wall. 601, Reedu. U. S. 
 b 14 Wall. 611, Leary v. U. S. 
 a 19 Wall. 643, Ins. Co. v. Fogarty 
 c 93 U. S. 241, Shaw v. U. S. 
 
184 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 204, The Grace Glrdler. 
 a 93 U. S. 339, The Juniata. 
 
 9IASCEIXTTS, THE, 1 Bl. 414. 
 
 Collision ; Sup. Court will not re- 
 verse except error clear, a 
 MABCHAirr, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Marohant. 
 MABCT, EliMWOOD v. See Elmwood v. Marcy. 
 MAKCT, TOWIf or OHIO v. See Town of OWo v. Maroy. 
 MABCT V. OSWEGO, 93 U. S. 637. 
 
 Municipal and county bonds in a 92 U. S. 644, Humboldt ». Lou^. 
 aid of railroads : conditions ; recit- a 94 U. S. 284, Comra'rs v. Clark, 
 als ; bona-flde holders, a a 99 U. S. 504, Wilson v. Sala- 
 
 manca. 
 a 102 U. S. 291, Buchanan v. Litch- 
 field. 
 MABCT, WAKBEN' CO. v. See Warren Co. v. Maroy. 
 TWATiTA MABTDf, THE, 12 TTall. 31. 
 
 Supreme Court; generally only 
 appellant can assign errors, a 
 Collision; rules of navigation. 6 
 Beversal only in clear case, c 
 
 MABIAItNA IXOBA, THE, 11 MTb.. 
 
 Piracy, a 
 
 Payments under protest; du- 
 ress, b 
 
 MABIGOI.D, IT. S. V. See U. S. o. Marigold. 
 MABINE BAUK v. FULTON BANK, 8 "Wall. 856, 
 
 Banks ; general deposits, a 
 Damages for failure of promise 
 to pay. 6 
 Eri-or; waiver, c 
 
 a 13 Wall. 741, The Mabey. 
 b 91 U. S. 214, The Sunnvside. 
 6 92 U. S. 438, The America, 
 c 97 U. S. 328, Tlie City of Hartf 'd 
 1. 
 
 a 12 Wh. 1, The Palmyra, 
 a 2 H. 229, U. S. v. Brig Malek. 
 6 10 H. 256, Maxwell v. Griswold. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 078, Thompson v. KIggs 
 a 10 Wall. 155, Bank ». Millard. 
 
 503, Bank v. Bank. 
 
 122, Oulton V. Sav. Inst. 
 
 370, Scammon v. Kim- 
 ball. 
 
 583, Newcomb U.Wood. 
 
 6 16 Wall. 
 a 17 Wall. 
 a 92 U. S. 
 
 MABINE INS. CO. 
 MABINE INS. CO. 
 
 c 97 U. S 
 
 , HEABNE V. See Heame v. Marine Ins. Co. 
 V. HODGSON, 6 Cr. 818. 
 
 Pleading ; evidence must be lim- 
 ited to plea ; venire de novo, a 
 
 Error ; refusal to continue, or 
 granting new trial, not assignable 
 for error. & 
 
 Depositions in chancery; against 
 whom admissible in evidence, c 
 
 MARINE INS. CO. V. HODGSON, 
 
 a 4 H. 148, Garland v. Davis. 
 6 6 H. 5, Sims v. Hundley. 
 b 20 H. 265, Spenser ». Lapsley. 
 a 2 Wall. 195, Chittenden «. 
 
 Brewster. 
 & 3 Wall. 105, Sparrow v. Strong, 
 c 10 Wall. 436, Tappan».Beardsley 
 7 Cr. 336. 
 
 Equity; on what terms it will 
 grant relief, a 
 Belief against judgments, b 
 
 MARINE INS. 
 MABINE INS. 
 
 Marine insurance 
 ness. o 
 
 a 8 H. 161, Veazle v. Williams. 
 b 17 H. 445, Hendrickson v. Hink- 
 
 ley. 
 h 8 Wall. 373, Mattingly v. Nye. 
 b 17 Wall. 628, Kibbe v. Benson. 
 b 94 U. S. 658, Crim v. Handley. 
 6 95 U. S. 159, Brown v. Buena 
 Vista Co. 
 CO., liEEDS T. See liOeds «. Marine Ins. Co. 
 CO. V. WILSON, 3 Cr. 187. 
 
 seavvorthi- | a 7 Wh. 610, Door v. Ins. Co. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 185 
 
 MARINE INS. CO. v. TOUNG, 1 Cr. 331. 
 
 Assumpsit; new consideration, a \ alQP. 327, French v. Gilsoii. 
 MAKEVE INS. CO. v. YOUNG, 5 Cr. 187. 
 
 Refusal to grant new trial ; not 
 assignable for error, a 
 
 a IP. 105, Wright v. Hollings- 
 
 worth. 
 a 5 H. 223, Jones v. Van Zant. 
 a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Cliicugo. 
 a 1 Wall. 59S, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 a 100 U. S. 81, R. R. v. Thombly. 
 
 MARKEY V. lANGlEY, 98 U. S. 150. 
 
 Trustees; liability, a \ a,94U. S. 750, Tate v. Norton. 
 
 MARION CO. V. CtARK, 94 V. S. 278. 
 
 County bonds in aid of internal o 96 U. S. 277, Rocli Creek u. Strong 
 improvements; township aid act of 
 Kansas 1872. a 
 
 jJIARQUEZ V. FRISBIE, 101 U. S. 473 
 
 Public land; pre-emption; wlien 
 jurisdiction of land office exclusive 
 and final ; patents ; fraud, a 
 MARR, DEVEREAUX v. See Devereaux v. Marr. 
 MARRIOTT V. BRTJNE, 9 H. 619. 
 
 Revenue; duty on sugar, a 
 
 Importers can invoke the courts, b 
 
 Brandy; duty on. c 
 
 Assessment of duties, d 
 MARS, THE. See U. 3 v. The Mars. 
 MARSH V. BROOKS, 8 H. 831. 
 
 Louisiana ; Indian hinds, a 
 
 MARSH, BURCHELI, -v. 
 MARSH V. FULTON CO 
 
 a 101 U. S. 519, Vance v. Burbank. 
 a 102 U. S. 375, U. S. v. Atherton. 
 
 a 9 H. 646, U. S. v. Southmayd. 
 b 10 H. 234, Greeley v. Thompson, 
 c 13 H. 495, Lawrence w. Caswell. 
 d 24 H. 526, Belcher v. Linn. 
 
 a 14 H. 521, Marsli v. Brooks. 
 
 See Barcliell v. Marsh. 
 , 10 Wall. 676. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 465, Kenicott v. Sup'rs. 
 6 19 Wall. 252, Nugent v. Sup'rs. 
 6 94 U. S. 806, East Lincoln v. 
 
 Davenport, 
 c 102 U. S. 299, Louisiana U.Woods 
 
 Municipal bonds ; antliority of 
 corporations to i.ssue. a 
 
 Subscriptions to railroads. 6 
 
 Right to recover consideration 
 paid for void bonds, c 
 MARSH, REED v. See Beed v. Marsh. 
 MARSH V. WHITMORE, 81 Wall. 178. 
 
 Equity; laches, a I a 96 U. S. 618, Hayward v. Bank. 
 
 I a 99 U. S. 212, Godden v. Kimmell 
 MARSHAX, ROGERS v. See Rogers v. Marshal. 
 MARSHAX, WEBB v. See Webb v. Marshal. 
 MARSHAIil V. BAtT. & OHIO R. R. CO., 16 H. 341. 
 
 Corporations ; s u i t s in U. S. 
 courts; citizensiiip. a 
 
 Contract to improperly uiflueuce 
 legislatures and public officers ; il- 
 legality. 6 
 
 a 18 H. 405, Ins. Co. v. French. 
 
 a 20 H. 231, Br. Co. u. Sheplierd. 
 
 a 21 H. 214, R. R. Co. v. Qnigley. 
 a 1 Bl. 295. R. R. Co. v. Wheeler. 
 b 2 Wall. 55, Tool Co.w.Norris 
 a 5 Wall. 542, Ins. Co. v. Ritchie 
 a 8 Wall. 178, Paul v. Virginia. 
 
 a 10 Wall. ,556, Penn. r. Qui. Co. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 8-.i. R.R. Co. 1'. Harris 
 
 a 18 Wall. 575, Sew. Ma. Co. Case 
 
 6 21 Wall. 450, Tri-st v. Child. 
 
 6 101 U. S. Ill, MegnireuCorwine 
 
186 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 MARSHAir V. BEVERLEY, 5 Wli. 313. 
 
 Parties, a | a 16 Wall. 451, Kibon v. E. E. Co. 
 
 MABSHAlt v. DELAWARE INS. CO., 4 Cr. 303. 
 
 Marine insurance ; total loss, a | ffi 12 P. 391, Bradlie v. Ins. Co. 
 MARSHALL, G. G. R. & B. CO. v. See Grand Galf R. E,. & B. Co. v. Marshall. 
 MARSHALL, IRVINE v. See Irvine v. Marshall. 
 MARSHALL v. KNOX, 16 Wall. 555. 
 
 Snprenie Court; no inrlsdietion 
 
 in bankruptcy where Circiiit Court 
 exercises supervisory jurisdiction, a 
 
 Jurisdiction of bankrupt court; 
 when exclusive of State court. 6 
 
 Suits by assignees to recover back 
 property of bankrupt, e 
 
 a 19 Wall. 286, Coit v. Eobinson 
 
 6 20 Wall. 419, Mays v. Fritton. 
 
 c 21 Wall. 339, Bank v. -Jones. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 293, Sandusky v. Bank. 
 
 b 91 U. S. 526, Evster v. Gaff. 
 
 b 92 U. S. 83, O'Brien v. Weld. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 348, Wisvvall v. Camp- 
 bell. 
 
 b 94 U. S. 737, Jerome o.MoCarter 
 MARSHALL, LEWIS v. See Lewis v. Marshall. 
 MARSHALL, McCUTCHEN v. See MoCutchen v. Marshall. 
 MARSHALL, RENNER v. See Eenner v. Marshall. 
 MARSHALL v. VICKSBDRG, 15 Wall. 15S. 
 Foi-feitures ; not favored, a I a 91 U. S. 3o, Bank v. Dearin^. 
 
 I a 101 U. S. 628, Jones v. Guar. C'o. 
 MARSTBLLER, FAW v. See Faw v. Marsteller. 
 MARSTELLER v. M'CLEAN, 7 Cr. 156. 
 
 Limitations; disabilities, a I o 2 Wh. 315, Shipp w. Miller 
 
 Must be set up by the bill. 6 | 6 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Beuhara. 
 
 MARSTON, PALMER v. See Palmer v. Marston. 
 MARTIN, BROOKS v. See Brooks v. Martin. 
 MARTIN V. CHEW, 16 P. 315. See Gibson v. Chew. 
 
 U. S. courts ; assignees; sec. 11 i a 2 H. 242, Dromgoole v. Bank 
 of jiidiciaiy act. a \ 
 
 MARTIN, CURTIS v. See Curtis v. Martin. 
 MARTIN, GOOD v. See Good v. Martin. 
 MARTIN, KANOUSE v. See Kanouse v. Martin. 
 MARTIN V. MOTT, 13 Wll. 39. 
 
 Constitution ; power of tiie Pre- 
 sid;.'nt to suppress insurrection, a 
 
 Discretionaiy powers ; when they 
 cannot be supervised. 6 
 
 What is a judicial act; due pro- 
 cess of law. c 
 
 MARTIN V. THOMAS, 34 H. 315. 
 
 Sureties; erasure, a 
 MARTIN, TOOF v. See Toof v. Martin. 
 MARTIN V. W^ADDELL, 16 P. 401. 
 
 Sovereignty of the States over 
 land below low water mark, a 
 Construction of statutes. 6 
 Fisheries, c 
 
 7 H. 34, Lutlier v. Borden. 
 
 7 II. 122, Wilkes v. Dinsman. 
 18 H. 280, Murray v Hoboken Co. 
 
 1 Wall. 254, ex parte Vallandi- 
 gham. 
 
 8 Wall. 83, U. S. v. Speed. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 236, Smitli v. U. S. 
 
 a 3 H. 219, Pollard v. Hagan. 
 b 9 II. G29, Mairiott v. Bruno, 
 c 15 II. 422, Den v. Jersey Co. 
 c 18 H. 72, Smith v. JIarvland. 
 a 3 Wall. 720, Gilman (.'.'Philad-a. 
 a 6 Wall. 436, Mumfordu.Wai'clell 
 a 23 Wall. 68, St. Clair «. Loving- 
 
 ston. 
 a 94 U. S. 338, Barney v. Keokuk 
 a 94 U. S. 394, McCready v. Va. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 187 
 
 MARTIN V. HUNTEaB, 1 MVh.. 304. 
 
 Supreme Court ; wrii, of error to 
 State courts ; extent of the jiKlieial 
 power of the United States, a 
 
 How the Federal question must 
 appear. 6 
 
 Construction of the Constitution ; 
 contemporaneous construction, c 
 
 Power of Supreme Court to re- 
 view its decrees ; mandate, d 
 
 Not necessary that all the steps 
 required to give the Supreme Court 
 jurisdiction should be on file in the 
 court below, e 
 
 Appeal bond; approval, f 
 
 State and general government; 
 relations between; jurisdiction of 
 State courts over cases arising un- 
 der the Constitution, g 
 
 Supreme Court ; dismissal of 
 writ of error ; imposing terms, h 
 
 Removals, i 
 
 a 6 Wh. 375. Cohens v. Virginia. 
 6 2 P. 245, Wilson v. Creek Co. 
 6 4 P. 425, Craig v. Missouri. 
 6 6 P. 536, Worcester v. Georgia. 
 b 10 P. 36S, Crowell v. Kandali. 
 d 12 P. 491, ex parte Sibbald. 
 a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 c 16 P. 608, Prigg v. Pennsylvania. 
 d 'in. 424, Bridge Co. v. Stewart. 
 /12 H. 119, Williams v. Oliver. 
 c 12 H. 311, Cooley v. Wardens. 
 d 15 Hi 464, Corning uNmiI Factory 
 e 18 H. 534, Hudguis v. Kemp. 
 d 20 H. 480, Roboi:ts v. Cooper. 
 & 22 H. 202, Lytic v. Arkansas. 
 a 4 Wall. 428, The Moses Taylor. 
 / 4 Wall. 454, Davidson u. Lanier. 
 b 6 Wall. 253, Mayor v. Cooper. 
 d 7 Wall. 270, Litchfield v. R. R. 
 d 12 Wall. 129, Noonan v. Bradlc^y. 
 c 12 Wall. 532, Legal-Tender Cas. 
 a 13 Wall. 289, Railway v. Whitton 
 d 17 Wall. 284, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 a 19 Wall. 227, Ins. Co. v. Dunn. 
 £^93U. S. 137, Claflin t) Houseman 
 e 94 U. S. 112, Dayton v. Lash. 
 h 96 U. S. 720, O'Reilly v. Edring- 
 
 ton. 
 i 100 U. S. 262, Tennessee v. Davis. 
 ^102 U. S. 162, Seward u. Corneau. 
 a 102 U. 8. 253, Williams v. Bruffy. 
 
 MABTIN, TOUNG v. See Young v. Martin, 
 MABT, THE, 9 Cr. 140. 
 
 Jurisdiction; notice, a 
 
 a 24 H. 205, Nations v. Johnson. 
 a 1 Wall. 52, Com'der-in-Chief. 
 a 23 Wall. 136, RayuNorseworthy 
 a 91 U. S. 510, Earle v. McVeigh. 
 
 MART ANN, THE, 8 Wh. 380. 
 
 Supreme Court ; admiralty cases ; 
 amendments and further proofs, a 
 Informations by U. S. 6 
 
 See M'Donougli v. Dannery, 
 
 a 10 Wall. 420, The Mabey. 
 
 6 10 Wall. 431, U. S. v. Huckabee. 
 
 6 95 U. S. 586, U. S. v. Mann. 
 
 MART EORD, THE, 3 DaU. 188. 
 
 a 1 Wh. 252, L'Invincible. 
 
 6 12 Wall. 135, MailCo.u.Flanders. 
 
 Prize ; neutral courts, a 
 Supreme Court; only appellant 
 can assign error, b 
 
 MARTI.ANI> V. BAITIMORE & OHIO B. R. CO., 3 H. 534, 
 
 a 10 H. 414, Butler v. Peun. 
 6 10 H. 532, E. Hartford v. Br. Co. 
 c 9 Wall. .575, Assessor v. Osborn. 
 d 11 Wall. 93, U. S. v. Tynen. 
 
 Constitution ; police power, a 
 
 Grant of forfeiture can be dis- 
 pensed with by the Legislature. 6 
 
 Statutes; repeal; pending cases, c 
 
 Penalties ; remission, d 
 MABYXAND, BROWN v. See Brown v. Maryland. 
 MARYI.ANI>, McCULXOCH v. See McOuUoch v. Maryland. 
 MAR-EXAND, PHIL. & WIXM. R. R. v. See Phil. & Wilm. E. E. v. Maryland, 
 
188 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 MAKTIiAND v. RAILKOAD CO., 22 WaU. 106. 
 
 Parol evidence; "surioundiirg | a 95 U. S. .31, Keed u. Ins. Co. 
 circumstances." a I a 102 U. S. 65, U. S. v. Peek. 
 
 MARtXAITD, SMITH v. See Smith v. Maryland. 
 
 MAETIANB, WABD v. See Ward v. Maryland. 
 
 MABYlAmD INS. CO. T. IE KOY, 7 Cr. 86. 
 
 Marine insurance ; deviation, a | a 3 WIi. 163, Hughes v. Ins. Co. 
 MAEYIAND INS. CO., MVINGSXON v. See LiTingston «. Maryland Ins. Co. 
 MJLRTI.AND INS. CO., OLIVER v. See Oliver v. Maryland Ins. Co. 
 MARYLAND INS. CO. t. RUDEN, 6 Cr. 338. 
 
 Insuianee ; concealment ; mate- 
 riality to tlie risk a question for the 
 jury, a 
 
 MASON V. THE BI.AIREAU, 3 Cr. 368. 
 
 a 1 P. 181, McLanahan v. Ins. Co. 
 a 8 H. 245, Clark ». Manf. Ins. Co. 
 
 Salvage; who can claim, a 
 U.S. courts; jurisdiction; aliens. 
 b 
 
 a 10 P. 117, Hobart v. Drogan. 
 6 16 H. 10.5, Piquignot v. K. E. Co. 
 a 8 Wall. 473, The Comanche. 
 
 MASON, BRASHEAR v. See Brasliear v. Mason. 
 MASON, COT V. See Coy v. Mason. 
 MASON, DEANE v. See Deane v. Mason. 
 MLASON -V. ELDRED, 6 WaU. 831. 
 
 Judgments ; merger of con- I a 95 U. S. 348, Sessions r. Johnson, 
 tracts, a I a 99 U. S. 45, U. S. ».-Ames. 
 
 MASON v. EBARSON, 9 H. 348. 
 
 Tax titles, a | a 22 H. 434, Thompson v. Carroll. 
 
 MASON, GERMAIN v. See Germain v. Mason. 
 MASON V. HAILE, 13 Wh. 373. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; remedy, a 
 
 a 4 Wall. 553, Van Hoffman ti. 
 Quincy. 
 
 a 9G U. S. 74, Tennessee u.Sneed. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 602, EdwardsuKearzey 
 MASON, MESSENGER v. See Messenger v. Mason. 
 MASON, SMITH V. See Smith v. Mason. 
 MASON, TATIiOR v. See Taylor v. Mason. 
 MASON V. tr. S., 17 WaU. 70. 
 
 U. S.; suits in Court of Cl.aims; a 17 Wall. 75, Sweeny v. IT. S. 
 when receipt of a certain sum bars a 22 Wall. 509, Piatt v. U. S. 
 further demand, a o 92 U. S. 388, Savage v. U. S. 
 
 MASON, WILSON V. See Wilson v. Mason. 
 
 MASSACHUSETTS, BEER CO. v. See Beer Co. v. Massachusetts. 
 MASSACHUSETTS, HAMILTON CO. v. See Hamilton Co. v. Massachusetts. 
 MASSACHUSETTS, PROV. INST. t. See Provident Inst. v. Massachusetts. 
 3IASSACHUSETTS, RHODE ISLAND v. See Rhode Island v. Massachusetts. 
 MASSEY, AILEN v. See Allen v. Massey. 
 MASSEY, MENARD v. See Menard v. Massey. 
 MASSIE, BOULDIN v. See Bouldin v. Massie. 
 
MANUAL OF STJPKEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 189 
 
 IVIASSIE T. WATTS, 6 Cr. 157. 
 
 Locations; land laws of Vir- 
 ginia ; military warrants, a 
 
 Decisions by tlie State courts; 
 when U. S. courts slioulcl follow. 6 
 
 Equity; having jurisdiction of the 
 person, it will act on real estate 
 abroad, c 
 
 Resulting trusts, d 
 MASSINGHX v. DOWKS, 7 H. 767. 
 
 Judgment liens in U. S. courts ; 
 rule of decision, a 
 
 MASTERSON v. HEBNDON, 10 "Wall, 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error ; 
 all the parties must be joined, or 
 refuse to join ; summons and sever- 
 ance, a 
 
 MASTEKSON T. HOWARD, 18 Wall. 103. 
 
 War ; right of alien enemy to a 18 Wall 
 sue. a 6 93 U. S 
 
 When commercial relations with 
 States east of the Mississippi were 
 restored in late civil war. 6 
 
 MATHESOX V. GRANT, 8 H. 863. 
 
 At what time a judgment can be 
 set aside for want of jurisdiction, a 
 
 Verdict; when court will apply 
 verdict to good count. 6 
 MATHEWS, BETHEIi v. See Bethel v. Mathews 
 MATHEWS V. McSTEA, SO WaU. 640. 
 
 a G Wh. 557. Kerr v. Watts. 
 
 6 6 P. 291, Green u. Weal. 
 
 c 15 H. 240, North Ind. E. R. Co. 
 
 V. E. R. Co. 
 d 20 H. 558, Irvine n. Marshall, 
 c 9 Wall. 121, Cheever u. Wilson, 
 c 95 U. S. 723, Pennoyer u. Neff. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 437, Ward u. Chambprlain. 
 a 2 Bl. 603, Lefflngwell ». Wiinen 
 o 7 Wall. 217, Brown ». Pierce. 
 a 12 Wall. 158, Baker v. Morton. 
 a 91 U. S. 360, Morsell v. Bank. 
 
 416. 
 
 a 12 Wall, 
 a 14 Wall. 
 a 20 Wall. 
 a 93 U. S. 
 
 261, Germain u. Mason. 
 403, O'Dowd V. Bnssell. 
 157, Simpson u. Greeley 
 419, Sasje u. R. R. Co. 
 
 110, University v. Finch 
 595, Bond v. Moore. 
 
 a 6 H. 36, Bank k. Sims, 
 a 6 H. 274, Sheppard v. Wilson. 
 & 24 H. 345, S. P. Co. v. Sickles. 
 6 95 U. S. 126, Ins. Co. v. Boon. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 287, Ins. Co. u. Hendren 
 a 98 U. S. 594, Bond v. Moore. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error 
 to State court; Federal question 
 arising out of the civil war. a 
 
 MATHEWS V. McSTEA, 91 V. S. 7. 
 
 The civil war ; when commercial | a 93 U. S. 595, Bond v. Moore, 
 relations restored, a I 
 
 MATHEWS, NATIONAL BANK v. See National Bank v. Mathews. 
 MATHEWS, SIGERSON v. See Sigerson v. Mathews. 
 MATHEWS M. ZANE, 4 Cr. 383. 
 
 Writ of error to State courts ; 
 Federal question, a 
 
 MATTHEWS v. ZANE, 5 Cr. 93. 
 
 Land titles in JTortliwest Terri- 
 toi-y ; act 3d March, 1803. a 
 
 Equitable titles, h 
 
 Court will compare conflicting 
 titles, c 
 
 Statutes ; when they take effect. d 
 
 MATTHEWSON, CLARKE v. See Clarke i). Matthewson. 
 MATTHEWSON, SATTERLEE v. See Satterlee i). Matthewson. 
 
 i a 8 P. 312, Bnel v. Van Ness. 
 I a 1 P. 662, Ross v. Barlaud. 
 
 a 1 Wh. 202, Matthews v. Zane. 
 6 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 c 18 H. 21, Kissell v. Pub. Schools 
 d 17 Wall. 198, Lapeyre v. U. S. 
 
190 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 MATHIS, McGEB v. Seo McGee v. Mathis. 
 MATTXBTGLY v. NYE, 8 WaU. 370. 
 
 Fraudulent and voluntary con- 
 veyances ; subsequent creditors, a I 
 
 MATTISON, WRIGHT v. See Wriglit i). Mattlson. 
 
 MAUBAH V. BTILIiUS, 16 P. 438. 
 
 Letters of guaranty, a 
 
 102 U. S. 153, Graham v. K. K. 
 
 MAURAN V. rVS. CO., 6 Wall. 1. 
 
 The civil war ; nature of. a 
 
 a 1 H. 180, Bell v. Bruen. 
 
 a 2 H. 445, Lawrence v MeCalmont 
 
 a 7 Wall. 554, Coppell v. Hall. 
 a 20 "Wall. 395, N. Orl. v. 8. S. Co. 
 a 21 Wall. 351, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 
 MAXWELL, V. GRISWOLD, 10 H. 348. 
 
 Penal statutes, a 
 Duties; tariff acts; "exporta- 
 tion." b 
 
 a 10 H. 234, Greeley v. Thompson. 
 & 20 IJ. 578, Sampson ». Peaslee. 
 
 MAXWELL V. KENNEDY, 8 H. 810. 
 
 Statute of limitations ; concealed I a 101 U. S. 568, Bauk v. Carpenter 
 fraud ; allegation of ; demurrer, a \ 
 
 MAXWELL V. NEWBOLD, 18 H. 616. 
 
 Supreme Court ; wi'its of error 
 to State courts ; how the Federal 
 question must appear, a 
 
 a 1 Bl. 520, Hoyt u. Sheldon. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 509, Messenger v Mason 
 
 a 21 Wall. 549, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 
 MAXWELL, SLATER v. See Slater v. Maxwell. 
 MAXWELL, STUART v. See Stuart v. Maxwell. 
 MAY V. LE CLAIRE, 11 Wall. 333. 
 
 Bona-fide purchasers, a 
 Trust fund; when cestui 
 trust can follow. 6 
 
 a 12 Wall. 339, Villa v. Rodriguez 
 que b 96 U. S. 35, U. S. v. Bank. 
 
 6 98 U. S. 245, Slaughter v Glenn 
 
 a 100 U. S. 584, Dickerson v. Col- 
 grove. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 498, Baker v. Humph- 
 rey. 
 
 MAY, SKELLEKN v. See Skilleru «. May. 
 MAYBERRY, SLOCUM v. See Slocum v. Mayberry. 
 MAYER V. HELLMAN, 91 U. S. 496. 
 
 Assignments for benefit of cred- | a 98 U. S. 510, Eeed v. Mclntyre. 
 itors ; preferences, a \ 
 
 MAYHEW v. THATCHER, 6 Wh. 139. 
 
 Jury ; inquiry as to damages, a 
 Judgments; effect and credit to 
 
 be given to judgments of State 
 
 courts ; act of 1790. . 6 
 
 MAYOR, BANKS v. See Banks v. Mayor. 
 MAYOR V. COOPER, 6 Wall. 347. 
 
 U. S. courts; judicial power nn 
 der tlie Constitution. 
 Removals. 6 
 
 MAYOR, HENDERSON v. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 
 6 97 U. S. 
 
 104, Aurora v. West. 
 336, Ins. Co. v. Hanis. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 227, Iiis. Co. v. Dunn. 
 b 100 U. S. 270, Tennessee i' Davis 
 a 102 U. S. 140, R. R. Co. v. Miss. 
 
 See Henderson v. Mayor. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 191 
 
 MAYOR V. liOKD, 9 Wall. 409. 
 
 U. S. courts; niiunlamns to com- 
 pel levj' of tax to pay iuJgment 
 against a munioipaHty. a 
 
 Corporations ; contracts ; estop- 
 pel. 6 
 
 MATOK, PHELPS V. See Phelps i>. Mayor. 
 MAYOR V. KAY, 19 "Wall. 468. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 417, Sup'v'i-s «. Durant. 
 6 10 Wall. 645, Mer. Bank v. State 
 Bank. 
 
 Municipal corporation ; power to 
 issue negotiable bonds, a 
 
 a 96 U. S. 350, Hitchcoeku. Galves- 
 ton. 
 a 98 U. S. 315, Little Rock v. Bank 
 
 MAYOR, WARrNG v. See ■Waring v. Mayor. 
 
 MAYOR or BALTIMORE, BARRON v. See Barron v. Mayor of Baltimore, 
 
 MAYS V. FRITTON, SO WaU. 414. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; snit by assignee in 
 
 State court; j urisdiotioii ; waiver, a 
 
 a 22 Wall. 59, Scott v. Kellv. 
 h 95 U. S. 526, Evster v. Gaff. 
 a 05 U. S. 59, McHenry u. Soci^tfi. 
 
 MEAB V. BAIXARD, 7 WaU. 890, 
 
 Deeds; covenants, a 
 
 MEAD V. THOMPSON, 15 'Wall. 638 
 
 Supreme Court; jurisdiction in 
 bankruptcy; supervisory jurisdic- 
 tion of Circuit Court, a 
 
 MEAD V. U. S., 9 WaU. 709. 
 
 Court of Claims; reference of I a 17 Wall. 444, ea;^ar'<e Atocha. 
 case by Congress under special act. a \ 
 
 MECHANICS' BANK v. BANK OF COLUMBIA, 5 Wh, 
 
 I a 100 U. S. 562, Newton v. Com'rs 
 
 a 19 Wall. 286, Coit v. Robinson. 
 a 23 Wall. 293, Sandusky v. Bank. 
 a 93 U. S. 348, Wiswallw Campbell 
 
 3»6. 
 
 a 8 Wh. 347, Fleckner v. Bank. 
 a 13 P. 94, Bradley v. Packet Co. 
 6 8 H. 464, LeRoy v. Beard. 
 c. 1 Wall. 241, Baldwin v. Bank. 
 
 Coiporations ; powers of; con- 
 tracts not under seal, a 
 
 Contracts ; construction of by the 
 parties themselves. & 
 
 Parol evidence, c 
 
 MECHANICS' BANK v. LYNN, 1 P. 384. 
 
 Equity; relief in. a | a 8 H. 149, Veazie v. Williams. 
 
 MECHANICS' BANK, MINOR v. See Minor v. Mechanics' Bank. 
 MECHANICS' BANK T. SETON, 1 P. 299. 
 
 Parties; when objection to want I a 19 H. 114, Coiron v. Millaudou. 
 of may be taken, a | a 18 Wall. 474, R. R. Co. v. On: 
 
 MECHANICS AND TRADERS' BANK v. DEBOLT, 18 H. 380. 
 
 Constitution ; obli;?ation of con- 
 tract; exemption from taxation, a 
 
 U.S. courts; jurisdiction where a 
 State is interested ; court will only 
 regard parties on tlie record, b 
 
 MECHANICS AND TRADERS' BANK v 
 
 a 1 Bl. 475, FranklynBanku.Ohio 
 a 2 Bl. 544, Wright v. Sill. 
 a 8 Wall. 438, Home v. Rouse. 
 b 16 Wall. 220, Davis v. Gray. 
 
 THOMAS, 18 H. 384. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; power of the State to ex- 
 empt from taxation, a 
 
 MEEHAN V. FORSYTH, 34 H. 158. 
 
 Illinois land titles; Peoria lots; 
 limitations, a 
 
 a 8 Wall. 438, Home v. Rouse. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 152, Gregg v. Tesson. 
 a 2 Bl. 568, Dredge v. Forsyth. 
 a 2 Bl. 573, Kellogg v. Forsyth. 
 
192 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 MEEKS V. OLPHEBT, 100 U. S. 504 
 
 Statute of limitations; possession | 
 of real estate by wrong-doer, a \ 
 
 MEIGS V. McCI-TING, 9 Cr. 16. 
 
 Public land; rights of Indians, a 
 
 Power of the PrcsidiMit to oonvej' 
 by ti-eaty the public land. 6 
 MEMPHIS INS. CO., GARRISON t. See Garrison v. Memphis Ins. Co, 
 MEMPHIS, MUKDOCK v. See Mnrdoek v. Memphis. 
 MENARD V. MASSEY, 8 H. 305. 
 
 Missouri land titles; manner of 
 milking concessions by Spain, a 
 
 Survey; when conclusive. 6 
 
 When the land is severed fi'om 
 the public domain, c 
 
 Reservation from sale, d 
 
 Until survey and approval, holder 
 of confirmed claim no standing, e 
 
 EtTect of transfer of Louisiana on 
 titles. / 
 
 inchoate titles, ff 
 MERCEIN, BARRY v. See Barry v. Meroein. 
 MERCER V. SELDEN, 1 H. 37. 
 
 Limitations ; disabilities, a | a 94 U. S. 779, Hogan v. Kurtz, 
 MERCER, WATSON v. See Watson v. Mercer. 
 MERCER CO., COWXES v. See Cowles v. Mercer Co. 
 MERCER CO. V. HACKEXT, 1 WaU. 83. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 649, Trimble v. Wood- 
 head. 
 
 a 13 P. 200, Clark v. Smith. 
 6 17 Wall. 247. Ilolden v. Joy. 
 
 a 1.3 H. 252, Glenn v. XJ. S. 
 6 16 H. 507, Gnitard v. Stoddard. 
 c 18 H. 474, Ledoux v. Black. 
 d 19 H. 80, Willot v. Sandford. 
 e 19 H. 210, Cousin v. Blanc. 
 e 19 H. 334, Bryan v. Forsvth. 
 /22 H. 288, V.S.v. Hartrell. 
 e 1 Bl. 189, Carondelet v St. Louis 
 ff 14 Wall. 318, Dent v. Emmerger. 
 
 Count}' and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads; negotiability, a 
 
 Recitals in bonds ; estoppel ; bona- 
 fiile purchasers. 6 
 
 Corporations ; contracts ; estop- 
 pels, c 
 
 MERCHANTS' BANK v. 
 
 Negotiable I'.aper; difference be- 
 tween bank chocks and bills, a 
 
 Tender. 6 
 
 ^Vhen the court may direct a ver- 
 dict, c 
 
 Acceptance of checks, d 
 
 Cashier; authority, e 
 
 Efjiiitable estoppels, f 
 
 Corporations; agents, g 
 
 Ultra vires, h 
 
 a 7 Wall. 105, Aurora v. West. 
 6 9 Wall. 414, Mayor v. Lord. 
 c 10 Wall. 645, Mer.BankoSt.Bank 
 a 14 Wall. 296, Lexington v. Butler 
 6 15 Wall. 371, Grand Chute v. 
 
 Winegar. 
 b 92 U. S. 491, Coloma 'v. Eaves. 
 b 92 U. S. 500, Venice v. Murdock. 
 c 93 U. S. 514. Randolph v. Post. 
 & 96 U. S. 314, San Antonio v. 
 
 Malieffy. 
 6 99 U. S. 682, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 6 99 U. S. 686, Lyons v. Munson. 
 6101U. S. 204. Pompton v. Union. 
 
 STATE BANK, 10 WaU. 647. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 020, Espy v. Bank. 
 b 93 U. S. 325, Taltv v. Bank, 
 c 94 U. S. 284, Com'rs v. Clark. 
 d 94 U. S. 345, Bank v. Wliiiniuii. 
 c 95 U. S. 443, R. R. Co. ^. Jonc.*. 
 e 96 U. S. 31, U. S. v. Bank. 
 / 96 U. 8. 721, Morgan v. R. R. 
 c 97 U. S. 278, Macon Co. rSlHiirs 
 c 99 U. S. 656, Spring v. Ednar. 
 c 99 U. S. 678, Orleans v. Platr. 
 .9100 U. S. 702, Bank v. Gi-aliaui. 
 c JOl U. S. 18, Bowditcli t) Boston 
 c 101 U. S. Ill, Meguire u Corwine 
 hWlV. S. 183, People's Dank v. 
 
 Bank. 
 /lOl U. S. 351, Creswell v. Lan- 
 
 alian. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 193 
 
 MERCHANTS' BAMK, IVES v. See Ives i). Merchants' Bank. 
 MEKCHAUTS' BANK, N. J. NAV. CO. v. See N. J. Nav. Co. v. Merch. Bank. 
 MEKCHAJJTS' INS. CO., CABRINGTON v. See Oarrington v. Merch. Ins. Co. 
 MEBCHANXS' INS. CO., TATLOE v. See Tayloe v. Merchants' Ins. Co. 
 MEKCHANTS' NAT. BANK, NAT.. BANK v. See Nat. Bank v. M. Nat. Bank. 
 MEKCHAJSfTS' NAT. BANK, TAPPAN v. See Tappan v. Merch. Nat. Bank. 
 SIEBIDITH, CI-EAK^VATEB v. See Clearwater v. Meridith. 
 MEKIDITH V. V. S., 13 P. 49*. 
 
 Revenue laws ; "importation." a, a S Wall. 120, "Wanngw.The Mayor 
 Action of debt to recover duties. 6 | 6 19 Wall. 240, Sav. Bank ». U. S. 
 
 MERINO, THE, 9 WTi. 401. 
 
 Adiniralty ; informations, a 
 
 a 20 Wall. Ill, Confiscation Cases. 
 
 MERRIIit V. PETTY, 16 WaU. 385. 
 
 Supreme Court; amount in con- I a 95 U. S. 695, Thompson v. Butler 
 troversy. a \ 
 
 MERRnX V. TOEMANS, 94 U. S. 568. 
 
 Patent law ; patentee bound by 1 a 95 U. S. 278, Keystone Br. Co. v. 
 the patent, o I Iron Co. 
 
 MERBIMAC, THE, 8 Cr. 387. 
 
 Property in goods shipped by 
 consignor to care of liis agent with 
 directions as to delivery, a 
 
 a 1 Wh. 211, St. Jose Indians. 
 
 MEBRIMAC, THE, 14 "WaU. 203. 
 
 Collision ; negligence, a 1 a 10 Wall. 54, The Wenona. 
 
 MERRTMAN t. BOURNE, 9 WaU. 600. 
 
 Estoppel by deed, a 
 California; Mexican titles; pu- 
 eblo lands, b 
 
 MESA V. V. S., a Bl. 731. 
 
 Supreme Court ; return of writs 
 of errorand appeals ; filing record, a 
 
 a 21 Wall. 48S, Grossholtz v. New- 
 man. 
 6 98 U. S. 17, Palmer v. Low. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 50, Castro v. U. S. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 310, Edmonson v Blooni- 
 
 sliire. 
 a 99 U. S. 506, Grigsby v. Purcell. 
 
 MESSENGER v. MASON, 10 Wall. 509. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to I a 21 Wall. 549, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 State courts; Federal question, a \ 
 METZ, MTLNOB v. See Milnor v. Metz. 
 METZGER, EX PARTE, 5 H. 176. 
 
 Supreme Court; appellate juris- a 1 Wall. 253, ex parte Vallandi- 
 diction ; habeas corpus, a „ „,. „ „„ gluam. 
 
 ' a 8 Wall. 99, ez^arfe Yorgcr. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 166, ex parte Langc. 
 a 100 U. S. 341, ea^arie Virginia. 
 
 METER V. ARTHDR, 91 U. S. 570. 
 
 Duties ; construction of statutes a | a 96 U. S. 133. Murphy v: Arnsoii. 
 
 13 
 
194 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 METEB V. MCSCATINE, 1 ■Wall. 385 
 
 Subscriptions in aid of railroads ; 
 validity of bonds; recitals; estop- 
 pel ; bona-fide holders, a 
 
 Contracts; construction given by 
 the parties interested, b 
 
 Taxation; what is a publiciise. c 
 
 a 3 Wall. C6o, Kon;er« v. Burling- 
 ton. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 274, Mitchell v. Burling- 
 ton. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 105, Aurora v. West. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 414, Mayor v. Lord. 
 
 a 13 Willi. 305, Pend'ii Co. v. Amy 
 
 a 15 Wall. 37], Grand Chute v. 
 Winegar. 
 
 6 16 Wall. 162, James w.Mllwiuikee 
 
 c 19 Wall. 677, P. Grove i). Talcott 
 
 a 92 U. S. 491 , Coloma v. Eaves. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 206, Com'rs v. January. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 284, Com'rs v. Clark. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 218, Sup'rs v. Galbraith 
 
 3EETEB, BOOSEVEtT v. See Eoosevelt v. Meyer. 
 MEZES, GBEEB v. See Greer v. Mezes. 
 MIAMI CO., MOEAII V. See Moran e. Miami Co. 
 MICHAELS v. POST, 21 WaU. 398. 
 
 Bankruptcy; %\lien adjudication [ a 22 Wall. 157, Sloan v. Lewis, 
 cannot be assailed collaterally. , a I 
 
 MICHIGAN BANK v. EL,I>B£D, 9 WaU. 548. 
 
 Hypothetical charge to the jury. a\a 93 U. S. 299, R. K. Co. v. Horst. 
 
 I a 101 U. S. Ill, MeguirevCorwiue 
 MICH. CEN. B. B. CO., NOBTH. IND. B. B. CO. v. See Northern Indiana 
 
 K. B. Co. V. Michigan Central E. R. Co. 
 MICHOUS T. GIBOD, 4 H. 503. 
 
 Trusts; limitations, a 
 
 Supreme Court U. S. ; final de- 
 crees. 6 
 
 Equity; stale claims; lapse of 
 time, c 
 
 When trustee cannot purchase 
 trust property, d 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees ; 
 limitations ; concealed fraud, e 
 
 MICOU, DAT V. See Day v. Micou. 
 MILBCBN, EX PABTE, 9 P. 704. 
 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benliam. 
 6 G H. 202, Forgay v. Conrad. 
 c 7 H. 826, Steavns v. Page. 
 d 8H. 149, Veazie v. Williams. 
 b 18 H. 200, Craighead v. Wilson. 
 b 19 H. 284, Bcebe v. Russell. 
 d 2 Wall. 85, Bi-ooks v. Martin, 
 c 2 Wall. 93, Badger v. Badger. 
 e 7 Wall. 346, Thompson v. Dean, 
 c 18 Wall. 506, Clarke e. Booimun. 
 /98 U. S. 238, Andrae ». Redfield. 
 
 Supreme Court ; habeas corpus ; I a 1 Wall. 253, ex parte Vallandi- 
 
 appellate jurisdiction, a 
 
 MII.ES V. CALDWBLIi, 8 W^aU. 44. 
 
 Ejectment; conclusiveness of 
 judgments, u. 
 
 When judgments can be pleaded 
 in bar; dismissals without preju- 
 dice, b 
 
 Rents and profits, c 
 
 gham. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 248, Blanchard v. Brown 
 a 4 Wall. 175, Sturdy v. Jackavvay 
 6 7 Wall. 110, Durautu.EssexCo. 
 c 17 Wall. 292, Tvler v. Magwire. 
 o 94 U. S. 354, Cromwell J). Sac. Co 
 a 94 U. S. 775, Hogaii v. Kurtz. 
 b 99 U. S. 263, Campbell u. Rankin 
 See Bank of the Republic v. Millard. 
 
 MIXI.ABI>, BANK OF THE BEP. 
 
 MIIXAtJDON, McDONOGH v. See McDonogh «. Millaudou. 
 
 MELIEDGE, MTLIEGAN v. See Millcgan v. Milledge. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, 
 
 195 
 
 MHIENGER, BtOOMER V. Sfle Bloomer v. MUlenger. 
 mnXEK, BI.AIR V. See Blair v. Miller. 
 
 ami-ER V. KERR, 7 Wh. 1. 
 
 Land laws ; when equity jjrowing 
 out of prior entry may be rebutted . a 
 
 Virginia military land warrants ; 
 eqnities, when they can be asserted 
 agaiiftt the legal title. 6 
 
 MXLIjER v. lEPE EfS. CO., 13 Wall. 
 
 Findings of facts; trial without 
 inry ; reviewof tinditigsby Supreme 
 Court, a 
 
 MILIJEIR, MUDSBT v. See lilndsey d, 
 MUXER V. MTNTCTBE, 11 Wli. 441. 
 
 Land laws ; in what time survey 
 
 must be made, a 
 Ejeetmeiit; limitations. 6 
 Laches ; equitable bar. c 
 Limitations; disabilities, d 
 Araeudraonts; when equivalent 
 
 to new suit, e 
 
 MII.I,ER T. NICHOI.S, 4 Wh. 311, 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court ; how the Federal ques- 
 tion must be shown, a 
 
 a 7 Wh. 213, Hoofnagle r. Ander- 
 son. 
 6 G P. 672, Lindsey v. Miller. 
 6 12 P. 204, Galloway v. Finley. 
 6 15 P. 104, Brush v. "Wear. 
 
 895. 
 
 a 1.5 Wall. 
 a 18 Wall. 
 a 19 Wall. 
 a 21 Wall. 
 a92U. S. 
 o 93 U. S. 
 a98U. S. 
 
 Miller. 
 
 438, Kichmond U.Smith. 
 248, Ins. Co. o. Folsom. 
 
 72, Crews v. Brewer. 
 161, Ins. Co. V. Sea. 
 469, Tyng v. Grinnell. 
 
 81, Rj'an v. Carter. 
 443, The Abbotsford. 
 
 MnXER -r. SHERRY, S WaU. 849. 
 
 Creditor's bills, a 
 
 Equity; extraterritorial jurisdic- 
 tion. 6 
 
 MILI.ER, S TTTP T* T. See SUlpp v. Miller. 
 MXLI.ER V. THE STATp, 15 WaU. 488. 
 
 a 6 P. 62, Miller v. M'Intyre, 
 6 6 P. 130, Sicard v. Davis, 
 c 9 P. 413, Piatt v. Vattier. 
 c 10 P. 180, Boon v. Chiles, 
 c 1 H. 189, Bowman v. Wathan. 
 d 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 e 22 Wall. 246, French ». Hay. 
 
 a 12 Wh. 117, Williams v. Norris. 
 a 2 P. 245, Wilson v. Creelv Co. 
 a 2 P. 380, SatterleeuMatthewson 
 a 3 P. 392, Harris v. Dennie. 
 o 4 P. 410, Craig ». Missouri. 
 « 5 P. 24S, Fisher ». Cockrell. 
 « 6 P. 41, Davis v. Packard. 
 a 10 P. 368, Crowell v. Kandell. 
 a 12 P. 103. Beaston v. Bank. 
 a 16 P. 296, U. S. v. Eliason. 
 a 12 H. 102, Neilson v. Lagow. 
 a 18 H. 5J3, Maxwell v. Newbold. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 800,' Bridge v Heidelbaoh 
 6 99 U. S. 308, Phelps v. McDonald 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; power of tlie Legislature 
 over corporate charters, a 
 MUXER V. STEWART, 9 Wh. 703. 
 
 Sureties, a 
 
 a 15 Wall. 519, Holyoke v. Lyman. 
 a 99 U. S. 720, Sinking Fund Case 
 
 a 15 P. 206, U. S. v. Boyd, 
 a 6 H. 293, McMicken v. Webb. 
 a 20 H. 76, Leggett v. Humphreys 
 a 24 H. 316, Martin v. Thomas. 
 a 2 Wall. 234, SmUh u. U. S. 
 a 2 Wall. 604, Bead v. Bowman. 
 a 21 Wall. 657, U. S. ti. Boecker. 
 a 92 U. S. 98, Magee v. Ins. Co. 
 
196 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BULtEK V. TIirrNY, 1 WaU. 310. 
 
 Contracts; by what law govern- I a 01 U. S. 411. Sciidder w. Bank, 
 ed; interest, a I o 96 U. S. 02, Cromwell y Sac. Co. 
 
 MTLI-EB V. U. S., 11 Wall. 89». 
 
 . 344, Tyler v. Defrees. 
 , 201, Pelliam v. Way. 
 . 598, Brown u Kennedy 
 . 104, Coi>fiscatioJi Cas." 
 . 27, Semmes v. U. S. 
 , 661, Lampt). Bras.s Co. 
 . 207, Wallach v. Van 
 Riswiok. 
 
 712, Pike v. Wassell. 
 
 778, Alex. v. Fairfax. 
 
 594, Springer v. U. 8. 
 
 MTLLIGAIf, EX FAKTE, 3 WaU. 107. 
 
 Supreme Court ; habeas corpus, a i a 18 Wall. 166, ex parte Lange, 
 
 I a 100 U. S. 23, ex parte Eeed. 
 
 MTLUGAjy V. MILtEDGE, 3 Cr. 83». 
 
 Equity; pleas and answers, a 1 a 14 P. 210, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 MILI.S T. BAJSTK OF THE U. S., 11 Wi. 430. 
 
 Confiscation, a 
 
 a 11 Wall 
 
 Judgments of U. S. courts ; when 
 
 a 15 Wall 
 
 they cannot be impeached collat- 
 
 a 15 Wall 
 
 erally, b 
 
 a 20 Wall 
 
 Constitution; due process of 
 
 a 91 U. S 
 
 law., c 
 
 6 91 U. S 
 
 
 a 92 U. S 
 
 
 a 94 U. S 
 
 
 a 95 U. S 
 
 
 c 102 U. S 
 
 Negotiable paper ; days of grace ; 
 custom of banks, a 
 
 Notice ; every variance not fatal 
 to. h 
 
 a 1 P. 28, Bank v. Triplett. 
 6 9 P. 45, Bank ». Swann. 
 a 14 P. 318, Fowler v. Brantly. 
 a 4 H. 324, Cookendorfer v. Pres- 
 ton. 
 a 15 H. 535, Adams v. Otterback. 
 6 17 H. 606, Dennistown v. Stewart 
 
 MTLIS V. BKOWN, 16 P. 585. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to | a 4 Wall. 180, E. R. Co. v. Rock. 
 State courts; Federal question. a\ 
 
 mnXtS T. DUBTEE, 7 Cr. 481. 
 
 Constitution ; judgments ; credit 
 and effect to be given to. a 
 
 Act May 26, 1790; authentica- 
 tion, h 
 
 MJXtS V. ST. CliAZB CO., 8 H. 569. 
 
 Ferry grant ; exclusive right to ; 
 construction in favorof the public, a 
 
 a 3 Wh. 234, Hampton v. M'Coii- 
 nell. 
 
 a 13 P. 324, M'Elmoyle v. Cohen. 
 
 6 11 H. 172, D'Arcv u. Ketchum. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 302, Christmas w Russell 
 
 6 5 Wall. 310, Green v. Van Bus- 
 kirk. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 148, Green v. Van Bus- 
 kirk. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 123, Cheever ». Wilson. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 619, Crapo v. Kellv. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 462, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 81, Maxwell u. Stewart 
 
 6 95 U. S. 422, Turnball v. Payson 
 
 a 97 U. S. 336, Ins. Co. v. Harris. 
 
 cr 23 H. 437, Minturn v. Larue. 
 a 1 Bl. 380, Rice v. Railroad Co. 
 a 1 Bl. 630, Conway v. Taylor. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPRtEME COURT DECISIONS. 197 
 
 3VIILI.S V. SMITH, 8 Wall. 87. 
 
 Instructions to jury; abstract l a 16 Wall. 516, Tweed's Case, 
 propositions, a I a 95 U. S. 166, Improv. Co. v Stead 
 
 MTLLS T. STODDAKD, 8 H. 345. 
 
 Missouri land titles; confirma- | a 15 H. 535, Delauriere ». Emison. 
 tiou by Congress ; reservations, a | a 19 Wall. 632, Macliay v. Easton. 
 MTLN, NEW YORK v. See New York v. Miln. 
 MTLNOK V. METZ, 16 P. 281. 
 
 Jurisdiction of controversy con- I a 99 U. S. 306, Philps v. McDonald 
 cerning fund in U. S. Treasury, a \ 
 MlXIiS, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Mills. 
 MII.I,S, VANDKWATEB v. See Tandewater v. Mills. 
 aHLWAUKBB, mCHMOND V. See Biohmond v. Milwaukee. 
 MHWAUKEE, TATES v. See Yates v. Milwaukee. 
 MILWATIKEE K. B. CO., EX PARTE, 5 "Wall. 188. 
 
 Supreme Court; appeals and 
 writs of eri'or ; bond, a 
 Writ of supersedeas. 6 
 
 a 7 Wall.311, Edmonson»Bloom- 
 shire. 
 
 b 10 Wall. 292, S 1 a u g 1 1 1 e r-House 
 Cases. 
 
 6 12 Wall. 100, Fi-enchB Shoemaker 
 
 MILWATJKEE R. R. CO., BLOSSOM v. See Blossom v. Milwaukee E. E. Co. 
 MHWAUKJEE R. R., ERSKINE T. See Erekine v. E. E. Co. 
 amT^AUKEE R. R. V. KELLOGG, 94 U. S. 469. 
 
 Proximate cause of loss, a | a 95 U. S. 133, Ins. Co. v. Boon. 
 
 MTLW^AUKJEE & BUNN. R. B. v. SOUTTEB, 8 WaU. 440. 
 
 Supreme Court; final decrees. a\ a7 Wall. 346, Thompsons. Dean. 
 
 TVmVTA QUEEN T. HEPBURN, 7 Cr. 390. 
 
 Hearsay evidence, a a 1 Wh. 6, Davis v. Wood. 
 
 a 5 P. 81, Scott V. Katcliflfe. 
 a 10 P. 412, Ellicott v. Pearl. 
 
 MINEB, PUBCEX.1. v. See Purcell l). Miner. 
 MINEBS' BANK v. U. S., 5 H. 813. 
 
 Quo warranto, a, | a 3 Wall. 238, Terr'y ». Lockwood. 
 
 MINING CO., BOGGS v. See Boggs v. Mining Co. 
 MINING CO., McGABRAHAN v. See McGarrahan v. Mining Co. 
 MINIS V. U. S., 15 P. 448. 
 
 Treaties with the Indians, u I a 17 Wall. 246, Holden ». Joy. 
 Public officers ; extra services. 6 j 6 91 U. S. 564, Hall K. U. S. 
 MINNESOTA V. BACHELDE3, 1 WaU. 109. 
 
 Land titles; patent enurement; I a 7 Wall. 224, Silver v. Ladd. 
 equitable title, a | a 13 Wall. 86, Johnson c.Towsley 
 
 MINNESOTA CO. v. ST. PAUL CO., 8 WaU. 631. 
 
 Kaih-oads; rolling Stock, a a 6 Wall. 742, Minn. Cow St. Paul 
 
 U. S. and State courts; conflict 6 102 U. S. 262, Bank v. Calhoun. 
 
 of jurisdiction. 6 
 
 MINN. & N. E. E. CO., BICE v. See Eice v. Minn. & N. W. E. E. Co. 
 
 MINN. & P. E. B., EAENSWOETH v. See Farnswortli v. Minn. & P. E. K. 
 
 MINOR V. HAPPERSETT, 81 Wall. 178. 
 
 Constitution ; snflrage. a | a 92 U. S. 554, U. S. v. Cruikshank. 
 
198 
 
 MANUAL OF StJPKEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SmrOK V. MECHANICS' BAI«E, 1 P. 46. 
 
 Sureties; joint and several bond, a a 
 
 Corporations ; powers ; when 6 
 
 " may " is constrned as " shall." & e 
 
 Misjoinder; nolle prosequi, c d 
 
 Agents ofcorpoi-ations; powers, d e 
 Sureties ; liability ; new duties, e 
 Ban lis ; ca8l)iers. f 
 
 MIKOK V. TIIJW>TSaN, 1 H. 888. 
 
 Supreme Court ; will not dismiss 
 for want of a bill of exceptions, bnt 
 will aflSrni. a 
 
 11 P. 91, U. S. V. Lefler. 
 9 H. 256, Mason v. Fearson. 
 17 H. 610, Griffln v. Eeynolds. 
 19 H. 318, Ins. Co. v. Ina. Co. 
 14 Wall. 501, U. S. V. Powell. 
 /lOOU. S. 454, Caseir. Bank. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 604, Pomeroy v. Bank, 
 ,a 3 Wall. 103, Sparrow v. Strouo-. 
 a 10 Wall. 260, K. K. v. Morffan.'' 
 a 11 Wall. 677, Cook e. Burnley. 
 a VI Wall. 140, The Eutaw. 
 a 91 U. S. 131, Bait. & P. R. R. v. 
 Trustees. 
 
 MINaK V. TUXOTSON, 3 H. 3»4. 
 
 Bills of exception, a 
 
 Supreme Court; error must ap- 
 pear upon the record. 6 
 
 Evidence; copies, c 
 
 Louisiana ; common law cases 
 can be reviewed only by writ of 
 error ; equity cases by appeal, d 
 
 MDfTUBN V. CROMMEMN, 18 H. 88. 
 
 a 5 H. 28S, Phillips v. Pieston. 
 a 8 H. 483, Prentice v. Zane. 
 b 20 H. 439, Snydam v. Williamson 
 c 24 H. 179, 6reg;g v. Forsyth. 
 6 2 Bl. 484, Taylor u. Morton. 
 d 12 Wall. 442, Walker ». Dreville. 
 d 20 Wall. 622, Murdocki; Memphis 
 
 Land titles; patents; presump- 
 tions as to autliority to issue, a 
 
 Pi-e-emption- ; when cancellation 
 of entry by Commissioner void, h 
 
 Patent for land previously grant- 
 ed void, c 
 
 a 22 H. 459, Fuentes v. U. S. 
 h 1 Bl. 139, O'Brien v. Perry, 
 c 21 Wall. 675, Morton « Nebraska. 
 a 92 U. S. 425, Clements v. Mache- 
 bouel. 
 
 MINTUKN, I^WKENCE v. See Lawrence i). Mintum. 
 MTBANBA, U. S. V. See U. S. ii. Miranfla. 
 
 497. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 242, Geoi'gia w. Grant. 
 b 7 Wall. 353, Gaines u. Thompson 
 
 MISSISSIPPI v. JOHNSON, 4 WaU. 
 
 Supreme Court; suit in which 
 State is a party ; leave to file bill, a 
 
 Public officers ; control of courts 
 over ; discretionary powers, b 
 
 MISSISSIPPI, MOOKE V. See Moore v. Mississippi. . 
 MISSOURI, CRAIG v. See Craig d. Missoaii. 
 MISSOURI, CUMMINGSv. See Cammings ^. Missonri. 
 MISSOURI V. IOWA, ? H. 6G0. 
 
 Supreme Court; original juris- | a 11 Wall. .54, Virginia ». West Va. 
 diction; boundaries, a \ '6 
 
 MISSOURI, KLINGER v. 
 MISSOURI, WELTON t. 
 MIS. KAN. & TEX. R. R 
 
 See Klinger v. Missoari. 
 See Welton v. Missouri. 
 CO. V. KAN. PAC. R. R. CO., 97 U. S. 491. 
 
 Land grants by Congress to rail- , a 99 U. S. 475, Railway «. Ailing. 
 loads ; location ; wlien title vests, a 1 a 101 U. S. 509, Hall w. Russell; 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 199 
 
 mTCHEIil. V. HARMONY, 13 H. 115. 
 
 Supreme Court ; damages and a 
 interest on judgments, a b 
 
 War; private property taken for c 
 public use. 6 
 
 Military power, c a 
 
 Jury; the consideration of the b 
 evidence i« for Ihe jury, d 
 
 U. S. officers ; when not liable 
 for acts committed during war. e 
 
 MITCHEEX v. HAWIET, 16 WaU. 
 
 Patent law ; assignments, a 
 
 14 H. S29, Perldns v Pourniquct 
 13 Wall. 628, U. S. v. Russell. 
 91 U. S. 716, Raymond v. 
 Thomas. 
 94 U. S. 101,R. R.B.Foley. 
 94 U. S. 234, Cammeyeru New- 
 ton. 
 S. 238, Ins. Oo.i>, Rodel. 
 S. 169, Dow V. Johnson. 
 
 95 U. 
 100 U. 
 
 d 
 e 
 
 544. 
 
 I a 17 Wall. 436, Adams v. Burke 
 
 MITCHELL V. TILGHMAN, 19 WaU. 378. 
 
 Patent law ; patent to Tilghman I a 102 U. S. 708, Tilghman v. Proc- 
 for fat acids; "processes." a \ tor. 
 
 MITCHEU., U. S. V. See U. S. 1;. Mitchell. 
 
 MITCHELL V. V. S., 9 P. 711. 
 
 Error ; appellate court cannot 
 notice a paper not used on trial, a 
 
 Indians ; in Florida ; validity of 
 a grant of Indian land, b 
 
 Laws of ceded country remain in 
 force till altered, c 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandates, d 
 
 Power of Crown ; public lands, e 
 
 Complete Spanish titles. /' 
 
 Court will ascertain specifle 
 boundaries of confirmed claim, g 
 
 protocols; testinionios. h 
 
 MITCHELI, T. U. S., IS P. 80. 
 
 Supreme Court U. S. ; power to 
 ehango its decision ; mandate, u, 
 
 MITCHELL V. U. S., HI WaU. 350. 
 
 Civil war; contracts for purchase 
 of cotton in the hostile territory ■ 
 intercourse; domicil; who were 
 enemies, a 
 MOBILB V. ESLAVA, 16 P. 234. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error; 
 Federal question; title under U. S. 
 a 
 
 Act 1824 granting water lots in 
 Mobile, b 
 
 Pai-ol proof of location and im- 
 provements, c 
 
 ■ Ri;;ht of States to land between 
 high and low water, d 
 
 MOBIIE V. HALLETT, 10 P. 261. 
 
 Land law; jirant by Congress of 
 water lots in Mobile to the city, a 
 
 MOBILE, OSBOKN v. See Osborn v. Mobile. 
 
 MOFFAT, COOK v. See Cook v. Moffat. 
 
 a 10 P. 209, Boon v. Chiles. 
 
 6 10 P. 303, U. S. V. Fernandez. 
 
 c 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 
 dl2 P. 491, ex parte Sibbakl. 
 
 e 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 b 15 P. 80, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 
 f 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 c 20 H. 173, Leitensdorfer v. Webb 
 
 g 21 H. 446, U. S. v. Fossatt. 
 
 6 17 Wall. 245, Holden v. Joy. 
 
 h 20 Wall. 284, McPhaul«.Lapsley 
 
 a 6 H. 40, Bank U. S. v. Sims. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 609, Desmare v. U. S. 
 
 a 2 H. 372, Chouteau v. Eckart. 
 6 2 H. 601, Pollard v. Files, 
 a 4 H. 177, Jourdon v. Barrett, 
 c 10 H. 507, Guitard v. Stoddard. 
 d 94 U. S. 337, Barney v. Keokuk. 
 
 a 1 H. 08, Mobile v. Emanuel. 
 
200 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 MOI-I-A:^ v. TORRANCE, 9 Wh. 537. 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship; at what a 7 B. 254, Vattier w. Hliide. 
 time the jurisdiction attaches, a a 12 P. 170, Clarke v. Matthewsou. 
 
 Assignees of choses in action ; a 5 H. 288, Pliillips v. Preston. 
 suits in U. S. courts by; sec. 11 b 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. w. Moss, 
 judiciary act. 6 " & 13 H. 186, Coffee u. Plant. Bank. 
 
 b 8 Wall. 396, Biadley v. Khines. 
 6 19 Wall. 83, Morgan v. Gay. 
 MOllISON, MONTICEI.I.O v. See Monticello v. MoUison. 
 MONTAXET V. MXTKRAT, 4 Cr. 46. 
 
 U. S. courts ; suits by assignees 
 of notes; sec. 11 judiciary act. a 
 
 Citizeusliip ; courts of the U. S. ; 
 jurisdiction. 6 
 
 Supreme Court ; dismissal for 
 want of jurisdiction ; costs, c 
 
 MONTAtTLT v. U. S., la H. 47. 
 
 Louisiana; Spanish grants after 
 Treaty of St. Ildelfonso. a I 
 
 o 5 H. 28S, Phillips v. Preston. 
 a 13 H. 186, Coffee v. Plant. Bank. 
 b 19 H. 402, Dred Scott v. Sandf'd. 
 c 9 Wall. .567, Hornthall v. Coll'r. 
 a 19 Wall. 88, Morgan v. Gay. 
 
 6 U Wall. 643, U. S. u. Lynde. 
 
 MONTE AILEGRB, THE, 7 Wh. 530. 
 
 Admiralty ; marshal's sales ; war- 1 a 9 Wli. 616, The Monte Allegro, 
 ranty. a I 
 
 MONTE AXI.EGRE, THE, 9 Wli. 616. . 
 
 Agent ; warranty by. a I 8 H. 464. Lei-ov v. Beard. 
 
 1 Wall. 369, Schuchardt v. Allen. 
 
 MONTELXO, THE, 11 WaU. 411. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; naviga- I a 20 Wall. 439, The Montello. 
 ble rivers, a \ 
 
 MONTGOMERY T. ANDERSON, 81 H. 386. 
 
 Jurisdiction; consent, a 
 Admiralty; proceeds follow the 
 cause into the Circuit Court, b 
 Supreme Court ; reversals, c 
 
 MONTGOMERY, JECKER v. See Jecker v. Montgomery, 
 MONTGOMERY v. HERNANDEZ, 13 TFli. 139. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 346, Merrill v. Petty. 
 6 20 Wall. 225, The Lottawanna. 
 c 23 Wall. 103, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 b 95 U. S. 617, The Wanata. 
 
 Wi'it of error to State courts; 
 Federal question, a 
 
 Party must claim right under the 
 Constitution for himself. 6 
 
 Statutes of limitations; excep- 
 tions not mentioned in statute, c 
 
 MONTGOMERY v. V. S., 15 Wall, 
 
 War; non-intercourse, a 
 Payments to agents in the ene- 
 my's country. 6 
 
 MOLtlSON, 
 
 insurer on 
 
 MONXICEttO, THE, l 
 
 Insurance ; lien of 
 judgment recovered by insured 
 where loss had been settled, a 
 
 Non-joinder of parties in a libel. 6 
 
 Ship; liability for collision; effect 
 of receiving insui'ancc money, c 
 
 Collision; lights, d 
 
 'a 7 H. 740, Smith m. Hunter. 
 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 6 10 H. 322, Henderson v. Tenn. 
 
 6 22 H. 160, Hale v. Gaines. 
 
 c 6 Wall. 542, Hanger v. Abbott. 
 
 6 91 U. S. 113, LongK. Converse. 
 
 395. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 603, U. S. v. Lapene. 
 a 21 Wall. 352, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 a 93 U. S. 612, Desmare v. U. S. 
 b 95 U. S. 432, Ins. Co. v. Davis. 
 
 17 H. 163. 
 
 a 19 H. 313, Garrison v. Ins. Co. 
 6 1 Wall. 53, Comm'd'r-in-Chief. 
 c 3 Wall. 266, Newell v. Norton. 
 d 6 Wall. 225, The Hypodame. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 201 
 
 MOON, KERK V. See Kerr v. Moon. 
 MOOKE V. AM. TBANS. CO., 34 H. 1. 
 
 Act of 1851 limiting liability of I a 3 Wall. 152, Walker u. Trans. Co. 
 vessels for loss from flre. a \ 
 
 MOOKE -V. BANK OV THE METKOPOLIS, 13 P. 307. 
 
 Bills of exception to admissibility I a 4 Wall. 682, U. S. v. MoMasters. 
 of evidence, a \ 
 
 MOOKE, CI/BMENTS v. See Clements v. Moore. 
 
 MOOKE V. GREENE, 19 H. 69. 
 
 Equity ; limitations ; concealed 
 fraud, a 
 How fraud must be alleired. 6 
 
 a 23 H. 208, Beanbien v. Beanbien 
 6 16 Wall. 29, Voorhees v. Bone- 
 steel. 
 a 101 U. S. 140, Wood v Carpenter 
 
 MOORE, HAMILTON v. See Hamilton v. Moore. 
 MOORE, HENDERSON v. See Henderson v. Moore, 
 MOORE, HOUSTON v. See Houston i). Moore. 
 
 MOOKE V. IXI.INOIS, 14 H. 13. 
 
 Constitution; second punishment | a 18 Wall 
 for tlie same oltense. a \ a 100 U. S 
 
 MOOKE, IIVINGSTON v. See Livingston v. Moore, 
 MOORE T. MISSISSIPPI, 31 Trail. 636. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to | a 98 U. S. 
 State courts ; Federal question, a \ 
 
 MOORE V. ROBBINS, 18 WaU. 688. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final judg- 
 ments, a 
 
 172, ex parte Lange, 
 390, ex parte Siebold. 
 
 142, Bank v. Bd. Tjiqui- 
 dation. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 628, St. Clair u. Loving- 
 
 ston. 
 a 20 Wall. 654, Parcels v. Johnson. 
 a 91 U. S. 2, McComb v. Com'rs. 
 
 MOORE V. BOBBINS, 96 U. S. 530. 
 
 Pre-emption; jurisdiction of the 
 Land Office, a 
 
 MOORE V. U. S., 91 V. S. 370. 
 
 Court of Claims; appeals; find- 
 ing of facts, a I 
 MOOKE, VEAZIE T. See Veazie d. Moore 
 MOKAN -v. MIAMI CO., 3 Bl. 735. 
 
 County bonds in aid of railroads ; 
 
 a 100 U. S. lis, Lansdale?) Daniels 
 a 101 U. S. 476, Marquez w. Frisbie. 
 a 101 U. S. 519, Vance u.Burbank. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 39, U. S. v. Clark. 
 
 conditions in act authorizing issue 
 recitals; rights of bona-fide hold- 
 ers; estoppel, a 
 
 Corporations; contracts; estop- 
 pel. 6 
 
 a 5 Wall. 
 b 10 Wall. 
 a 13 Wall. 
 a 14 Wall. 
 a 16 Wall, 
 a 92 U. S, 
 a 93 U. S 
 a 04 U. S. 
 
 a 99 V. S. 
 a 99 U. S, 
 alOlU. S, 
 
 MOBSECAI, INS. CO. v. See Ins. Co. v. Mordecai. 
 
 7S4, Supvrs. v. Schenck. 
 
 645, Mer. Bank v. Bank. 
 
 305, Pendleion v. Amy. 
 
 296, Lexington u Butler. 
 
 46.^, Kennicottw Supvrs. 
 
 491, Coloma v. Eaves. 
 
 513, Raudolpli v. Post. 
 73, Leavenwoith Co. v. 
 Barnes. 
 
 218, Supvrs.!;. Galbraitli 
 
 682, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 
 204, Pompton v. Coop- 
 er Union. 
 
202 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 MORDECAI V. irNDSAT, 19 H. 300. 
 
 District Court U. S.; final decrees 
 in admiralty; appeals to Circuit 
 Court; consent cannot give juris- 
 diction, a 
 
 Supreme Com-t ; reversals. 6 
 
 MORE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. More. 
 
 a 21 H. 386, Montgomeiyw. Ander- 
 son. 
 a 5 Wall. 490, Tlie Eddy. 
 a 16 Wall. 346, Merrill w. Petty. 
 6 23 Wall. 163, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 
 MOREAN V. C. S. INS. CO., 1 Wh. 819. 
 
 Marine insurance; total loss, a I a 7 H. 604, Hugg v. Ins. Co. 
 
 I a 19 Wall. 643, Ins. Co. ». Fogarty. 
 
 MOREHEAD, JONES v. See Jones v. Morehead. 
 
 MOREWOOD T. ENKEQUIST, 83 H. 493. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; maritime jail Wall. 28, Ins. Co. v. Dunliam 
 contracts, a | a 21 Wall. 556, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 
 MOREY V. tOCKWOOB, 8 WaU. 840. 
 
 Patent law ; i-ei>isue ; specifica- I a 93 U. S. 463, Russell b. Dodge, 
 tions. u I 
 
 MORGAN V. BEtOIT, 7 Wall. 613. 
 
 Municipal corporations ; legisla- I a 100 U. S. 528, Mt. Pleasant uBeck- 
 tive control; annexation; debts. a\ with. 
 
 MORGAN, BELOIT v. See Beloit v. Morgan. 
 MORGAN V. CBRTENIUS, 20 H. 1. 
 
 U . S. oouits ; when they will fol- | a 101 U. S. 129, Roberts v. BoUes. 
 low the decisioMsof State courts, a \ 
 
 MORGAN V. GAY, 19 WaU. 81. 
 
 U. S. courts; juriscliction; citi- 1 a 97 U. S. 650, Robertson «j. Cease, 
 zenship; liow shown, a | 
 
 MORGAN, KENNARD v. See Kennard i). Morgan. 
 MORGAN V. tOTJISIANA, 93 U. S. 817. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 711, R. R. v. Gaines. 
 a 102 U. S. 275, R. R. v. Hamblen. 
 
 a 12 P, 170, Clarke v. Matthevvsori. 
 6 15 H. 207, Kanonse v. Martin, 
 c 17 H. 137, Sliields v. Barrow. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; exemption fi-om taxation ; 
 does not pass by sale of franchise 
 of railroad company, a 
 
 MORGAN T. MORGAN, 8 Wh. 890. 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship ; at what 
 time it must appear, a 
 
 Jtirisdiction once attached, subse- 
 quent change will not oust it. 6 
 
 Parties, c 
 
 MORGAN v. PARHAM, 16 Wall. 474. 
 
 Vessels; where taxable, a | a 16 Wall. 630, Crapo u. Kelly. 
 
 MORGAN, PEETE v. See Peete i;. Morgan. 
 MORGAN V. RAILROAD CO., 9G C. S. 716. 
 
 Dedications, a | a 97 U. S. 696, Rich w.RockWand. 
 
 MORGAN V. RIENTZEL, 7 Cr. 873. 
 
 Xote ; suit on ; proUnction of. a\a 10 P. ,320. Roach v. \\\\\\\v'<. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 203 
 
 MOKGAN V. THOKNHTLI,, 11 -WaU, 
 
 Supreme Court ; bankruptcy; su- 
 pervisory jurisclictioii of Circuit 
 Court ^HaZ, a 
 Limitation of two 3-ears. 6 
 Appeals and writs of error, c 
 
 6S. 
 
 a 12 "Wall. 434, Hall v. Allen. 
 6 14 Wall. 431, Smith v. Mason. 
 a 15 Wall. 638, Meadu. Thompson, 
 c 16 Wall. 267, Ins. CouComstoek. 
 a 16 Wall. 555, Marshall v. Knox. 
 a 19 Wall. 283, Coit v. Robinson, 
 a 20 Wall. 178, Bank v. Cooper. 
 a 23 Wall. 160, Sticknev v. Wilt. 
 a 23 Wall. 293, Siuidusky w. Bank. 
 a 93 U. S. 348, WiswalluCampbell 
 a 98 U. S. 23, Glenny «. Langdon 
 a 98 U. S. 249, Giflford v. Helms. 
 
 MOKGAIir T. r. S., 14 "WaU. 531. 
 
 Chartei-parties ; marine risks; 
 liability of the U. S. in Court of 
 Claims, a 
 MORGAN, TJ. S. v. See U. S. o. Morgan. 
 MORNING UGHT, THE, 3 WaU. 557. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 206, Eeybold v. U. S. 
 
 fault : dam- 
 
 Collision ; mutual 
 ages divided, a 
 Inevitable accident. 
 Sailing vessels, c 
 Signal lights, d 
 
 morrux X. CONE, aa h. sa. 
 
 Agents ; deeds by. a 
 
 a 12 Wall. 43, The Maria Martin. 
 6 14 Wall. 215, The Mabey Cooper. 
 a 14 Wall. 361, The Continental. 
 6 21 Wall. 17, The Lady Pike, 
 a 23 Wall. 13, The Clarita. 
 a 91 U. S. 215, The Sunnyside. 
 c 91 U. S. 702, The Colorado. 
 a 92 U. S. 438, The America. 
 a 93 U. S. 313, The Atlas. 
 d 95 U. S. 610, The Wanata. 
 a 102 U. S. 203, The Clara. 
 
 I a 92 U. S. 425, Clements v. Mache- 
 bouef. 
 
 MORRIS, BINGHAM v. See Binghom v. Morris. 
 MORRIS'S COTTON, 8 WaU. 518. 
 
 Snpreme Court ; reversal where a 23 Wall. 162, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 court below was without jurisdic- 
 tion, a 
 
 MORRIS, CRANE v. See Orane v. Morris. 
 MORRIS, HIRST V. See Dirst u. Morris. 
 MORRIS V. HARMER, 7 P. 554. 
 
 Evidence; histories, a 
 
 MORRIS V. NIXON, 1 H. 136. 
 
 Mortgages and sales ; difference ; 
 extrinsic evidence to show sale in 
 reality a mortgage, a 
 MORRIS, U. S. V. See U. S. u. Morris. 
 MORRISH, McKINLEY v. See MoKinley v. Morrisli. 
 MORRISON, BELI, V. See Bell v. Morrison. 
 MORRISON, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Morrison. 
 MORROW V. WHITNEY, 95 V. S. 551. 
 
 Land titles ; act of Congress may 1 a 98 U. S. 17, Palmer «. Low 
 convey the legal title, a I 
 
 a 14 H. 412, Ennis v. Smith. 
 
 a 12 H. 145, Russell v. Southard. 
 a 19 H. 293, Babcock v. Wymaii. 
 a 12 Wall. 339, Villa u. Rodriguez. 
 
204 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 MOESE, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 MOBSE, O'EEtLIiT v. See O'Eielly v. Morse. 
 MORSEIili V. HAXIi, 13 H. 813. 
 
 EiTor; deeisioiis resting on dis- I a 11 Wall. 676, Cook v. Burnley, 
 cretiou not generally reviewable, a. | a 14 Wall. 22, Steins v. Franklin. 
 MOBTON, BAKER v. See Baker v. Morton. 
 MORTON, TAYLOR v. See T.iylor v. Morton. 
 MORTON, VAN NORDEN v. See Tan Norden v. Morton. 
 MOSES V. MAYOR, 15 TTall. 390. 
 
 Snpreine Court ; final decree, a I 
 
 MOSES TAYLOR, THE, 4 WaU. 434 
 
 Admiralty ; collision on naviga- 
 ble river; when jurisdiction exclu- 
 sive, a 
 Slaritinie liens ; State laws, b 
 Maritime contracts; carrying pas- 
 sengers, c 
 Rights to common-law remedy, d 
 U. S. conrts; jurisdiction; when 
 exclusive of State courts, e 
 
 When it cannot be affected by 
 State legislation. / 
 
 MOSS, BANK TJ. S. V. See Bank V.S.v. Moss. 
 MOSS, RIDDLE V. See Riddle v. Moss. 
 MOTT, MARTIN v. See Martin •». Mott. 
 MOULTRIE CO. V. SAVINGS BANK, 93 U. S. 631 
 
 a 2,3 Wall. 288, Thomas v. Wool- 
 dridge. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 562, TheHine&Trevor 
 b 7 Wall. 644, Tlie Belfast, 
 c 11 Wall. 28, Ins. Co.eDunham 
 d 11 Wall. 190, Loon v. Galcerau. 
 e 13 Wall. 288, R. R. v. Whittoii 
 a 16. Wall. 5,31, S. S. Co.b. Chase. 
 / 20 Wall. 453, Ins. Co. b. Morse. 
 6 21 Wall. 556, Edwards e. Elliott 
 e 92 U. S. 19, Gaines v. PnenteS. 
 « 93 U. S. 137, Claflin v. House- 
 man. 
 b 93 U. S. 366, Norton w. Switzer. 
 a 102 U. S. 119, Schoonmaker v. 
 Gilmore. 
 
 Municipal and county bonds ; re- 
 citals ; estoppel, a 
 
 Powers of municipal officers to 
 subscribe to stock of railroad. 6 
 
 MOUNTZ V. HODGSON, 4 Cr. 334. 
 
 Sup. Court; final judgments, a 
 
 MOVIUS V. ARTHUR, 95 U. S. 144. 
 
 Construction of statutes impos- 
 ing duties, a 
 
 General terms. 6 
 
 Designation of articles, c 
 MOWRY, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Mowiy. 
 MOWKY V. WHITNEY, 14 WaU. 639. 
 
 a 93 U. 8. 514, Randolpli v. Post. 
 b 9/ U. S. 89, Bates v. Winters. 
 a 99 U. S. 682, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 6 100 U. S. 594, Cass Co.«. Gillett. 
 a 101 U. S. 204, Pompton v. Union 
 a 102 U. S. 291, Buchanan v Litch- 
 field. 
 
 a 20 H. 555, McCargoB. Chapman. 
 
 a 96 U. S. Ill, Arthur v. Morrison 
 b 96 U. S. 127, Arthurs. Stepliani. 
 c 102 U. S. 212, Solomon v. Arthur 
 
 Patent law; infringement prof- 
 its, a 
 
 a 21 Wall. 228, Littlefleldu. Perry. 
 a 92 U. S. 139, Elizabeth v. Pave- 
 ment Co. 
 
 <5p» ti ur „" ^'^ ^- ^- °^0' ^- K- Co. V. Sayles. 
 
 See House v. Mullen. ^ 
 
 MULLEN, HOUSE v 
 
 MULLER V. DOWS, 94 U. S. 377. 
 
 subrZde?R"ule'20."'a''""' '° I " '"' ^^ ^- '''^ '"^'^''' ^ N^^^^^' 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 205 
 
 MXTLLHAXL V. KEENAN, 18 Wall. 343. 
 
 Supreme Conit will not review I a 101 U. S. 81, K. R. v. Twombly. 
 rulings on now trials, a \ 
 
 MTJ5EFOKD t. WAIlDEIiL, 6 Wall. 435. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; pow- 
 er to grant after occupation bj' U. 
 S. a" 
 
 Special verdicts. 6 
 
 Title to soil nnder tide water, c 
 
 MUMJIA V. POTOMAC CO., 8 P. 881. 
 
 Corporations; capital stock ; trust 
 fund for creditors ; dissolution ; 
 debts, a 
 
 Charters ; amendment of ; Con- 
 stitution ; obligation of contracts. 6 
 
 a 13 Wall. 3S8, Alexander uRoulet 
 b 16 Wall. 387, Ins. Co. v. Piaggio. 
 c 18 Wall. 66, Weber v. Harbor. 
 c 94 U; S. 394, MeCready v. Virgi- 
 nia. 
 
 MUNN T. HXINOIS, 94 V. S. 183. 
 
 Legislative control over rail- 
 loads. a 
 Mills. 6 
 Public warehouses, c 
 
 a 15 H. 305, Curran v. Arkansas, 
 a 18 H. 480, Bacon v. Robertson. 
 a 7 Wall. 410, R. R. v. Howard. 
 b 13 Wall. 214, Penn. College Cas. 
 a 21 Wall. 615, Kat. Bank v. Case. 
 a 92 U. S. 368, Scammon u. Kim- 
 ball. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 161, R. R. Co. v. Iowa. 
 a 94 U. S. 176, Peik v. R. R. Co. 
 a 94 U. S. 180, R. R. Co. v. Blake. 
 6 94 U. S. 314, Burl'ton v. Beasley. 
 c 95 U. S. 488, Hall v. De Cuir. 
 
 arCNBOE, DUNIiAP V. See Dunlap v. Munroe. 
 
 MtJNKOE, liKE v. See Lee v. Munroe. 
 
 MXTNSON, EUPKOVEMENT CO. v. See Improvement Go. v. Munson. 
 
 MUKDOCH, Mcdonough v. see MoDonougli V. Murdock. 
 
 MUBDOCK V. MEalPHIS, 20 Wall. 614. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error to 
 State courts ; Federal question ; 
 acts of 1789 and 1867. a 
 
 MXTKPHT v. STEW^ABX, » H. 363. 
 
 Error; matters lying in discre- 
 tion not assignable for error, a | 
 
 MUKPHY, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Murphy, 
 MTJBBAY V. BASER, 3 Wt. 641. 
 
 Statute of limitations; "beyond 
 
 a 20 Wall. 644, R. R. Co. v. Md. 
 a 21 Wall. 639, Moore v. Miss. 
 a 98 U. S. 142, Bank v. B'd Liq'n. 
 a 99 U. S. 297, MyrickuTlionipson 
 
 a 14 Wall. 22, Steines v. County. 
 
 MTJBBAY V. CHABiESTON, 96 U. S, 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; power of the State to deduct 
 tax on her own obligations; taxa- 
 tion of St.ate bonds, a 
 
 MCBEAY V. THE CHAKMING BETSEY, 3 Cr. 115. 
 
 a 11 Wh. 361, Shelby v. Guy. 
 a 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 a 97 U. S. 637, Davie v. Briggs. 
 
 433. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 683, Hartman v. Green- 
 how. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; marine 
 torts, a 
 Prize ; " p robable ca u se . " 6 
 
 MXTEEAY V. GIBSON, 15 H. 431. 
 
 Limitations; at what time statute 
 commences to run ; effect of repeal 
 of saving clause, a 
 
 a 10 Wli. 484, Manro v. Almeida. 
 6 3 Cr. 87, Maley v. Slialtuck. 
 b 3 Cr. 499, Sands v. Knox. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 600, Sohn v. Wattorson. 
 
206 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 MXTKBAY V. HOBOKEN tANB CO. 
 
 Constitution; due process of 
 law. a 
 
 , 18 H. 880. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 93, Wallcnor v. Sauv- 
 
 inct. 
 a 9G IT. S. 102, Davidson v. N. Or 
 a 102 U. S. 594, Springer v. U. S. 
 
 MDBBAT, JUSTICES v. See Justices v. Murray. 
 
 MUKRAT T. lABDNEE, 8 WaU. 118. 
 
 Negotiable paper; rights of bona 
 fide holders, a 
 
 a 7 Wall. 733, Texas v. 'White. 
 a 9 Wall. 550, Bank v. Eldred 
 a 21 Wall. 322, Chambers Co. o. 
 
 Clews. 
 a 21 Wall. 358, Hotchkiss v. Bank 
 a 94 U. S. 754, Collins u. Gilbert. 
 a 99 U. S. 082, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 a 101 U. S. 204, Pompton ». Union 
 a 101 U. S. 564, Shaw v. R. R. Co. 
 See Lovejoy v. Murray. 
 
 MCBBAT, LOVEJOT v 
 MUBBAY, MONTAtET v. See Montalet v. Murray. 
 aroSCAXINE, BUTZ V. See Butz v. Muscatine. 
 MUSCATINE, MEYEB v. See Meyer v. Muscatine. 
 aiUSCATINE, WAtKtEY v. See Walkley v. Muscatine. 
 MUSSINA V. CAVAZOS, 6 Wall. 357. 
 
 Supreme Court; docketing tran- 
 script of record, a 
 
 Writ of error; joinder of pai-ties. b 
 
 Writ of error and appeal; dif- 
 ferenc(! between, c 
 
 Bills of exceptions, d 
 
 a 7 Wall. 310, Edmonson ». 
 Bloomshire. 
 
 6 12 Wall. 2G1, Germain v. Mason. 
 
 c 20 Wall. 625, Murdock v. Mem- 
 phis. 
 
 d 93 U. S. 555, Stanton v. Embrey. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 506, Grigsby w. Purcell. 
 
 MUTUAX ASSUBANCE CO. v. WATTS, 1 Wh. 879. 
 
 «nM w'.T' ""•*^"''^ °* property I a6Wh.'606,Mut.Assur. Society t). 
 sold for the premium unpaid, a \ Faxon. 
 
 MUT. BEN. tlFE INS. CO. v. TISDALB, 91 U. S. 844 
 
 and"pfi™es.'' 'a ^""^ °"^^ •""'""' T ''^ ^- ^- ^^^ ^umcs v. Scruggs. 
 MYEBS, DUNBAB v. See Dunbar «. Myers. 
 MYEBS V. CROFT, 13 WaU. 891. 
 
 to^e'llbeforl'palf nt.°' J''''"™^'"'' | " '' ^""- ^^*' ^'»'»'' "• ^'^-"PO'-'- 
 
 MYEBS V. EENN, 6 Wall. 805. 
 
 Parties to suits ; how made, a | a 94 U. S. 21, ex parte Cuttin-r. 
 MYEBS, HARBISON V. See Harrison „. Myers. 
 MYEBS, TAYLOR v. See Taylor v. Myers. 
 
 MYEBS, YOBK & CUMB. B. R. v. See York & Oun.b. E. R. „. Myers. 
 NAILOR V. WIllIAMS, 8 Wall. 107. 
 
 Error; objections to question 
 asked witness; answer must be 
 shown by the bill of exceptions, a 
 
 a 101 U. S. 543, Lovell v. Davis. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 207 
 
 NATHAN V. LOUISIANA, 8 H. 73. 
 
 Coiistitiitioii ; regulation of com- a 8 VViill. 184, Paul v. Virginia, 
 mcrce. a ' 6 12 Wall. 218, St. Ton. Tax. Cas. 
 
 Power of States to tax ships. & c 12 Wall. 428, Ward v. Maryland 
 General power of taxation, c 6 99 U. 8. 279, Transportation Co 
 
 V. Wheeling. 
 a 100 U. S. 95, Trade-Mark Cases, 
 c 100 U. S. 499, Kirtland v. Hotch- 
 klss. 
 
 NATIONAL BANK v. BCBKHARDT, 100 V. S. 686. 
 
 Instrnctions to the jury, a I a 101 U. S. 200, RecUnagel v. Mtir- 
 
 I piiy- 
 
 NATIONAL BANK v. COMMONWEALTH, 9 Wall. 358. 
 
 National 
 States, a 
 Shares. 6 
 Capital stock 
 
 banks ; taxation by 
 
 a 9 Wall. 477, Lionberger v Rouse 
 a 9 Wall. 591, Thompson v. R. R. 
 a 18 Wall. 36, R. R. J). Peniston. 
 6 18 Wall. 230, Delaware R. R. Tax 
 a 94 U. S. 523, Waite v. Dowley. 
 c 95 U. 8. 687, Parrington v. Tcnn 
 b 101 U. S. 156, Cnmmings v. Bank. 
 
 NATIONAL BANK, CUMMINGS v. See Cummings v. National Bank. 
 
 NATIONAL BANK, GOLD MINING CO. v. See Gold Mining Co. 1;. Nat. Bank. 
 
 NATIONAL BAN^K v. GRAHAM, 100 V. S. 699. 
 
 Corporations; ultra vires; estop- | a 102 tl. S. 420, Daniels u. Teai-ney 
 pel. a I 
 
 NATIONAL BAIfK v. LNS. CO., 95 U. S. 6'?3. 
 
 Insurance ; answers to questions ; I a 100 U. S. 617, Ins. Co. v. Grridley 
 representations, a \ 
 
 NATIONAL BAJfK T. MATHEWS, 98 U. S. 397. 
 
 Corporations; ultra vires; who 1 a 101 U. S. 396, Whitney wWy man 
 can set up violation of charter, a | a 101 U. S. 628, .Jones v. Guar. Co. 
 
 NATIONAL BANK v. MERCHANTS' NATIONAL BANK, 94 U. S. 437. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; interest after I a 100 U. 8. 73, Holden v. Trust Co. 
 maturity, a \ 
 
 NATIONAL BANK, OATE3 v. See Dates v. National Bank. 
 NATIONAL BANK, PELTON V. See Peltqn v. National Bank. 
 NATIONAL BANK, SANDTJSKT v. See Sandusky 1). National Bank. 
 NATIONAL BANK v. TEXAS, 30 Wall. 81. 
 
 As.=igument of choses in action ; I a 90 U. S. 196, Dewingu Perdicaries 
 assignee takes subject to equities, a \ 
 
 NATIONS V. JOHNSON, 24 H. 203. 
 
 Judgment without notice; juris- a 1 Wall. 233, Baldwin v. Hale, 
 diction, a 6 7 Wall. 210, Brown v. Pierce. 
 
 Service by publication. 6 a 9 Wall. 313, Sec. u. McGarrahan 
 
 a 20 Wall. 222, The Lottawanua. 
 a 21 Wall. 428, Michaels v. Post. 
 a 23 Wall. 136, Ray v. Noseworthy 
 a 91 tf. 8. 504, Earle v. McVeigh. 
 a 91 U. S. 061, Lamp v. Brass Co. 
 a 95 U. 8. 734, Pcnnoyer v. Netf. 
 
 NACMKEAG COTTON CO., BUCKLEY v. See Bnokley 0. Naumkeag Cot. Co. 
 NAYLOB, GRANT v. See Grant v. Naylor. 
 
208 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 NEDL, BANK OF PITTSBURG v. See Bank of Pittsburg v. Neil. 
 NBAI. V. CLARK, 95 U. S. 704. 
 
 Biinkraptcy; discliai-ge ; fniud. a | o 99 U. S. 7, Wolf v. Stix. 
 NEAl, GREEN" v. See Green v. Neal. 
 NEBRASKA v. CAMPBELl, S Bl. 590. 
 
 Municival corporations; liiibility I a 91 U. S. 551, Barnes v. Dist. Col. 
 foi" negligi'ncc. a | 
 
 NEFF, CORBETT v. See Corbett v. Neff. 
 NEFF, PENNOTER v. See Pennoyer v. Neff. 
 NEH. V. OHIO, 3 H. 780. 
 
 Post-ro!ids; compact between the | a 12 H. 296, Achison v. Huddesoii. 
 U. S. and certain States, a 
 
 a 14 H. 496, Webster v. Coopei-. 
 6 G Wall. 471, Doe v. Con.sedine. 
 e 8 Wall. 665, Magwire v. 'I'yler. 
 c 13 Wall. 263, Klinger i'. Missouri. 
 c 17 Wall. 280, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 
 NEILSON T. lAGOW, IS H. 118. 
 
 Wills; trustees; when legal es- 
 tate vests in the beneficiaries, a 
 
 Naturi' of estate of trustee. 6 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to 
 State coiii-t; Federal qnestion. c 
 
 NELEIGH, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Neleigh. 
 
 NELSON T. CARLAND, 1 H. 365. 
 
 Bankrupt act of 1S41; appeals to I a 13 H. 11, Crawford v. Points. 
 Supreme Court, a \ 
 
 NELSON, DEAN V. See Dean v. Nelson. 
 NELSON, FOSTER v. See Fos-ter v. Nelson. 
 NELSON V. HILL, 5 H. 131. 
 
 ' Partnership ; creditors, a | a 92 U. S. 622, Lewis v. U. S. 
 
 NELSON V. LELAND, 88 H. 48. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; process I a 1 Bl. 581, The Commerce. 
 '» ''em. a | a 9 Wall. 457, The Maggie Ham'ond 
 
 NEREIDE, THE, 9 Cr. 388. 
 
 Prize ; liability of cargo to cap- I a S Wh. 415, The Atalanta. 
 ture as enemy's property, a \ 
 
 NESBIT, BALTIMORE & S. R. R. CO. v. See Baltimore & S. E. E. v. Nesbit. 
 NESMITH V. SHELDON, 6 H. 43. 
 
 Certificates of 
 forma, a 
 
 division ; 
 
 pro 
 
 NESMITH V. SHELDON, 7 H. 818. 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatory force of 
 State decisions, a 
 
 a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Chicago. 
 a 10 IT. 55, Webster v. Cooper. 
 a 18 H. 566, Dennistownv. Stewart 
 a 3 Wall. 256, Daniels v. R. R. Co. 
 
 a 11 H. 317, Van Rensselaer v. 
 
 Kearney. 
 a 2 Bl. 603, Lefflngwellw Warren 
 a 100 U. S. 62, Fairfield v. Gallatin 
 
 NEVADA, CRANDELL V. See Crandell d. Nevada. 
 
 NEVES V. SCOTT, 9 H. 870. 
 
 JIarriage settlements, a 
 
 a 13 H. 270, TSTeves v. Scott. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 753, Walker v. Walker. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 196, Adams v. Adams. 
 
 NEVES V. SCOTT, 13 H. 870. 
 
 U.S. courts; equity iurlsdictlon. a | a 2 Bl. 509, Noonan v. Lee 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 209 
 
 NEW AXBANY v. BUBKE, 11 Wall. 96. 
 
 Corporations; capital Steele trust I a 17 Wall. 620, Sawyer v. Hoag. 
 fund for creditors, a I 
 
 NEWAtli, NORTON v. See Norton ■». Newall. 
 NEWBE»BT, AUjEN v. See Allen v. Newberry. 
 NBWBOI.D, aiAXWEIiL v. See Maxwell v. Newbold. 
 NEWBI-Ii T. NORTON, 3 Wall. 366. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 233, The Hypotlame. 
 6 Vl Wall. 417, Thorp «. Hammond 
 
 OoUision ; appeal to Supreme 
 Court not encoinaged. a 
 
 Admiralty; tort; decree against 
 one of several respondents. 6 
 NEW ENG. BANK, BANK OF MET. v. See Bank of Met. u. NewEng. Bank. 
 NEW ENGIiAND INS. CO. v. THE SARAH ANN, 13 P. 387. 
 
 Admiralty ; petitory actions, a I o 18 H. 267, Ward v. Peck. 
 
 Master; power 'to sell his ship. 6 | 6 6 Wall. 26, The Amelie. 
 NEW ENG. INS. CO., HAZARD v. See Hazard u. New Eng. Marine Ins. Co. 
 NEW ENGLAND SCREW CO., BLIVEN v. See Bliven d. New Eng. Screw Co 
 NEWHALIi V. SANGER, 93 C S. 761. 
 
 Land grants to railroads; what | a 93 U. S. 564, Hiiffw. Doyle, 
 are " public lands." a | a 99 U. S. 387, Ryan v. R. R. Co. 
 
 NEW HAVEN, SOCIETY, &c., v. See Society, &c., u. New Haven. 
 NEW JERSEY V. NEW YORK, 5 P. 891, 
 
 Supreme Court; suits between 
 States, a 
 Original jurisdiction. 6 
 
 a 6 P. 323, New Jersey v. N. Y. 
 a 17 H. 490, Florida v. Georgia. 
 a 24 H. 95, Kentucky u. Dennison 
 6 1 Wall. 252, ex parte Vallandi- 
 gham. 
 
 NEW JERSEY T. YARD, 95 TJ. S. 104. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- I a 95 U. S. 685, Farringtonu.Tenn. 
 tracts; exemption from taxation, a | as 96 U. S. 511, R. E. Co. v. Maine. 
 NEW JERSEY CO., DEN v. See Den d. New Jersey Co. 
 NEW JERSEY STEAM NAV. CO. v. MERCHANTS' BANK, 6 H. 34*. 
 
 Ad m iralty i urisdiction . a 
 Corporations ; liability for act of 
 agents. 6 
 
 When principal can maintain an 
 action on written contract made by 
 agent without disclosing name of 
 principal, c 
 
 Carriers; liability for loss by 
 fire, d 
 Stipulations limiting liability, e 
 Burden of proof to show knowl- 
 edge of such limitations, f 
 
 a 5 H. 4.51, Waring v. Clarke. 
 
 6 18 H. 480, Bacon «. Robertson. 
 
 619 H. 313. Garrison b. Ins. Co. 
 a 21 H. 246, Allen v. ISTewberrj'. 
 c 21 H. 289, Ford v. Williams. 
 
 a 23 H. 492, Morewoodw. Enreqnist 
 d 24 H. 38, Moore v Am. Trans. Co 
 6 1 Wall. 241, Baldwin h. Bank. 
 e 3 Wall. 112, York Co. v. R. E. 
 d 3 Wall. 152, Walker u Trans. Co 
 c 5 Wall. 704, Nash u. Towne. 
 a 7 Wall. 638, The Belfast, 
 all Wall. 27, Ins. Co. v. Dunham 
 /12 Wall. 85. R. R. Co. v. Harris, 
 c 16 Wall. 329, R. R. Co. w. Mass. 
 e 17 Wall. 360, R. R. v. Lockwood 
 a 18 AVall. 304, Atkins v. Disinte- 
 grating Co. 
 e 22 Wall. 134, R. R. Co. w. Pratt. 
 e 93 U. S. 188, Bank v. Express Co 
 e 94 U. S. 130, Munn v. Illinois. 
 
 14 
 
210 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 NEW JERSEY v. WII/SON, 7 Cr. 164. 
 
 Supreme Court; original juris- a 6 P. 691, IT. S. d. Arrfdontlo. 
 
 diction ; suits between States, a a 12 P. 714, Eliode Island «. Mass. 
 
 Constitution ; exemption from 6 16 P. 284, Arnistrono; v. Alliens. 
 
 taxation ; obligation of contr.icts. 6 h 6 H. 332, Planters' B'ls u. Sliaip 
 
 Incorporations and grants by b 16 H. 376, Bank of Ohio v. Knoop 
 
 States; contracts, c h 1 Bl. 442, Jefferson Bunk uSkelly 
 
 6 4 Wall. 550, Van Hoffman v'. 
 
 Qniucv. 
 6 8 Wall. 438, Home.&c.',!;. Rouse 
 h 13 Wall. 376. Salt Co. v. East 
 
 Saginaw. 
 6 15 Wall. 458, Toralinson v Jessup 
 c 16 Wall. 232, Davis v. Gray. 
 '6 21 Wall. 498, R. R. Co. w.'Penii. 
 6 22 Wall. 573, Tucker v. Fergn?on 
 b 93 LT. S. 223, Morgan o Louisiana 
 
 NEWMAN, EX PAKTE, 14 Wall. 158. 
 
 Supreme Court: mandamus, a | a 101 U. S. 720, ex parte R. R. Co. 
 NEW ORLEANS, BEAUREGARD v. See Beauregard v. New Orleans. 
 NEW ORI-EANS, CANNON v. See Cannon «. New Orleans. 
 NEW ORLEANS T. CLARK, 95 U. S. 644. 
 
 Municipal corporations; legisla- 
 tive control ; annexation ; debts, a 
 
 NEW ORLEANS v. DE ARMAS, 9 P. 
 
 Writs of error to State courts 
 
 Federal question, a 
 
 I a 100 U. S. 534, Mt. Pleasant v. 
 \ Beckvvith. 
 
 834. 
 
 a 10 P. 391, Crowell v. Randell. 
 
 a 3 H. 704, McDonough v. Millan- 
 don. 
 
 NEW ORLEANS, EOUVERGNE v. See Fouvergne «. New Orleans. 
 NEW ORLEANS, GAINES v. See Gaines u. New Orleans. 
 NEW ORLEANS V. STEAMSHIP CO., 80 Wall. 38'?. 
 
 Supreme Court ; proceeding for I a 102 U. S. 122, Hayes v. Fischer 
 contempt ; review of. a | 
 
 NEW ORLEANS v. U. S., 10 P. 710. 
 
 Louisiana ; purchase of. a o 12 P. 427, Strotlier u. Lucas. 
 
 Trespasser ; adverse possession, b 6 16 P. 51, Watkins v. Holman. 
 Dedication to public uses, c c 9 H. 25, Irwin v Nixiou 
 
 Accretion, d c 14 H. 271, University v. Indiana. 
 
 Patents ; how far conclusive, e d 10 Wall. 116, Schools v. Risley. 
 
 e 18 Wall. 117, Best v. Polk. 
 
 d 23 Wall. 68, St. Clair «. Lov'stou 
 
 90. 
 
 I a 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 1 a 6 Wall. 287, Barney u. Baltimore. 
 
 t. See U. S. 11. New Orleans E. R. 
 
 66. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 516, Washington v. The 
 Gregory. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 319, The Atlas. 
 
 b 94 U. S. 497, The Margaret. 
 
 NEW ORLEANS v. WINTER, 1 WU, 
 
 Citizen of a Territory not a citi- 
 zen of a " State." a 
 
 NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD, U. S. 
 NEW PHILADELPHIA, THE, 1 Bl. 
 
 Carriers ; liability of both collid- 
 ing ships for injury by collision, a 
 I'ugs. 6 
 
 NBW^SOM V. PR*OB, 7 Wh. 10. 
 
 Surveys and grants; what calls 
 
 a 21 H. 321. Brown v. Hunger. 
 a 5 Wall. 836, Higueras v. U. S. 
 a 23 Wall. 02, St.ClairD.Lov'ston 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 211 
 
 NEWTON, CAMMETER v. See Oammeyer v. Newton. 
 NEWTON, INS. CO. v. See Ins. Co. v. Newton. 
 
 NEWTON V. STEBBINS, 10 H. 606. 
 
 Collision ; steam vessels ; rate of I 
 {^peed. a \ 
 
 a 18 H. 90, McCreadyt). Goldsmith- 
 a 91 U. S. 701, The Colorado. 
 
 NEW WOKID, THE, V. KING, 16 H. 469. 
 
 Admiralty; jurisdiction of collis- 
 ion on navigiible rivers, a 
 
 Common carriers ; carriage ol 
 passengers by steam ; negligence- b 
 
 a 20 H. 297, Jackson v. Magnolia. 
 6 17 Wall. 375, R. E. u. Lockwood 
 6 91 U. S. 494, MilwaukeeR.B.u. 
 
 6 93 U. S. 296, Ind. E. e! v. Horst 
 b 102 U. S. 455, Peun. Co. ». Eoy. 
 
 NEW TOBK, BANK OF COMM. v. ' See Bank of Commerce i). New York. 
 NEW YORK V. CONNECTICUT, 4 Dall. 3. 
 
 Supreme Court U. S.; suits be- 
 tween States, a 
 Judicial and political questions, b 
 
 a 1 P. 110, Georgia v. Madrazo. 
 a 5 P. 284, New Jersey v. N. Y. 
 6 6 Wall. 73, Georgia v. Stanton. 
 
 NEW YORK, IMAYOR OF, HENDERSON v. See Henderson v. Mayor. 
 NEW YORK T. aHLN, 11 P. 102. 
 
 Constitution ; _poZJce power; com- 
 merce ; regulations of. a 
 
 14 P. 561, Holmes v. Jennison. 
 
 15 P. 508, Groves v. Slaughter. 
 5H. 573, License Cases. (Opin. 
 
 Taney, Ch. J.) 
 7H. 392, Pas'ger Cases. (Opin. 
 McLean, J.) 
 14 H. 572, Veazie v. Moore. 
 3 Wall. 725, Gilmon v. Phila. 
 12 Wall. 216. St. Ton. Tax Cas. 
 
 16 Wall. 63, Slaughter-H o ii s e 
 Cases. 
 
 92 TJ. S. 265, Hend'son v Ma3-or 
 
 92 U. S. 552, tr. S.wCruikshank 
 
 a 100 U. S. 678, Mach. Co. v. Gage. 
 
 NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY v. See New Jersey v. New York. 
 NEW YORK, OSWAI/D v. See Oswald v. New York. 
 NEW YORK, THE, v. RAB, 18 H. 384. 
 
 ' Collision ; lookouts, a a 3 Wall. 273, The Ottowa, 
 
 Tugs ; liability. 6 
 
 9 Wall. 671, The Quickstep. 
 a 91 U. S. 209, The Sunnyside. 
 
 98 TJ. S. 887. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 589, V. S. v. Thomp.son. 
 a 98 U. S. 333, Bank ». McVeigh. 
 
 NEW YORK INS. CO. v. HENBREN, 
 
 Supremie Court; writ of cri-or 
 to State courts ; Federal questions 
 growing out of the civil war. a 
 
 STATHAM, 93 U. S. 84. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 428, Ins. Co. v. Davis. 
 a 96 U. S. 243, Ins. Co. v. Norton. 
 a 96 U. S. 580, Ins. Co.«Egglestou 
 
 CO. 
 
 NEW YORK LIFE INS. 
 
 War; effect on niutyal life insur- 
 ance policies; result of failure to 
 pay the premium ; forfeitures, a 
 
 NEW YORK S. S. CO., UN. S. S. CO. v. See Union S. S. Co. v. N. Y. S. S. Co. 
 NEW YORK & B. B. R., WINANS v. See Winans v. New York & Erie R. E. 
 
212 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 NEW YOKK & nv. S. S. CO. V. BUMBAU:., 21 H. 384. 
 
 Collision ; steamer and sailing 
 vessels ; rules of navigation, a 
 
 a 22 H. 472, Trans. Co. v. Phil, and 
 
 Sav. S. Nav. Co. 
 a 4 'Wall. 512, Bentley v. Coyne. 
 a 7 Wall. 201, The Grace Girdler. 
 a 7 Wall. 663, The Nicholls. 
 a 8 Wall. 306, The Carroll. 
 a 8 Wall. 592, The Potomac. 
 a 9 Wall. 153, The Johnson. 
 a 9 Wall. 422, The Fairbanks. 
 a 14 Wall. 276, The Cayuga. 
 a 19 Wall. 52, The Wenona. 
 a 23 Wall. 181, The Sea Gull. 
 a 91 U. S. 218, The Snnnyside. 
 a 94 U. S. 603. The Stephen Mor- 
 gan. 
 
 NEW TOKK AND TIBGINIA 8. B. CO. v. CAXDEBWOOD, 19 H. 245. 
 
 Admiralty ; jurisdiction of collis- 
 ion on navigable rivers, a 
 
 Collision with vessel at anchor. 6 
 NIAGARA V. CORDES, 81 H. 26. 
 
 Common carriers ; ships ; liabil- 
 ity for loss of goods, a 
 
 Perils of the sea; common car- 
 rier cannot by stipulation relieve 
 himself from loss by negligence, b 
 
 Ship-owners ; liability for injury 
 occasioned bj' collision, c 
 
 a 20 H. 297, Jackson v. Magnolia. 
 b 23 Wall. 14, The Clarita. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 51, Com'der-in-Chief. 
 a 3 Wall. 369, McAndrews v. 
 
 Thatcher. 
 a 8 Wall. 385, The Baltimore. 
 a 9 Wall. 459, The Mag. Ham'ond 
 6 9 Wall. 685, The Portsmouth. 
 a 21 Wall. 15, The Lady Pike, 
 c 95 U. S. 605, The Wanata. 
 a 98 U. S. 480, K. K. Co. » Varnell 
 
 NICHOI., rCRMAN V. See Furman v. Nichol. 
 NlCHOIiAT, BBEEDI'OVE v. See Breedlove v. Nicholay. 
 NICHOIiAT, HENBT CO. v. See Henry Co. v. Nicholay. 
 NICHOI-t, CONARD v. See Conard v. NichoU. 
 NICHOMi, U. S. V. See U. S. •». Nicholl. 
 NICHOitS V. EATON, 91 TJ. S. 716. 
 
 Bankruptc3' ; bequest of pi-operty 
 with a condition that on bankrupt- 
 cy the interest should cease, o. 
 
 NICHOIXS V. FEARSON, 7 P. 106. 
 
 Usury, a 
 
 a 94 TT. S. 526, Hyde ». Woods. 
 
 a 13 P. 350, Moncnre v. Dcrmott. 
 a 18 Wall. 886, Tiffany ». Boats- 
 man's Inst. 
 
 NICHOI.I.S T. HODGES, 1 P. 566. 
 
 Orphans' Court; allowances, a | a 8 H. 411, West v. Smith. 
 NICHOLAS, MrLlEB v. See Miller v. Nloholls. 
 NICHOIXS V. WEBB, 8 Wh. 326. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; foreign bills ; I a 10 P. 582, Dickens v. Beall. 
 evidence of demand and protest, a | a 18 Wall. 541, Chaffee v. U. S. 
 
 NICHOtS, THE, 7 Wall. 664. 
 
 Collision; sailing vessels and I a 23 Wall. 75, The Dexter. 
 
 I a 91 U. S. 204, The Free State, 
 
 steamers, a 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 213 
 
 NICHOI-S V. LEVY, 5 TVaU. 433. 
 
 U. S. courts; when they follow I a 102 U. S. 655, Barrett «. Holmes, 
 the decisions of the State courts, a | 
 
 JSICHOI-S, SMITH V. See Smltli v. Nichols. 
 NICHOI.S V. tJ. S., 7 WalL 188. 
 
 U. S. ; not responsible for laches 
 and torts of oflficers. a 
 
 Suit against collectors to recover 
 back taxes, h 
 
 a 8 Wall. 275, Gibbons c. U. S. 
 
 6 10 Wall. 444, Kimball v. CoU'r. 
 
 h 10 Wall. 552, Ballimoie u. R. R. 
 
 h 12 Wall. 15, CoU'r J). Hnbbanl. 
 
 b 92 U. S. 88, Cheatham v. U. S. 
 
 h 92 U. S. 614, State R. R. Tax 
 
 6 96 U. S. 569, U. S. v. Kaufman. 
 a. 101 U. S. 345, Langford v. U. S. 
 
 KICHOI.SON, DE SOBKT v. See De Sobry v. Nicholson. 
 NICHOLSON, GAINES t. See Gaines v. Nicholson. 
 JflCHOIiSON, OSBORNE v. See Osborne v. Nicholson. 
 NICHOI.SON", PATXON v. See Patton i). Nicholson. 
 NICHOISON PAV. CO. v. JENKINS, 14 TTaU. 453. 
 
 Patent law; assignments, a | a 98 U. t>. 553, Heiidrie ». Sayles. 
 NIXON, ASPDBN V. See Aspden v. Nixon. 
 NIXON, HAKKISON v. Sec Harrison v. Nixon. 
 NIXON, MOKKIS T. See Morris v. Nixon. 
 NIXON, PACKEK v. See Packer v. Nixon. 
 NOBLE, KOBINSON v. See Eobinson v. Noble. 
 NOE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Noe. 
 NOONAN T. BBABtEY, 9 Wall. 399. 
 
 Administrator; right in other i a 12 Wall. 126, KToonanw. Bradley. 
 States, a | 
 
 NOONAN V. BKADXEY, 13 WalL 139. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandates, a 
 Power of court below to amend 
 judgment after wiit of error. & 
 
 NOONAN T. LEE, 8 Bl. 499. 
 
 Equity practice of U. S. courts, a 
 How fraud must be alleged, h 
 Mortgages; stipulation that in 
 case of default whole debt sliall be- 
 come due. c 
 
 Deeds; covenants; warranty; 
 eviction, d 
 
 a 17 Wall. 285, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 b 21 Wall. 552, Edwards w. Elliott. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 77, Orchard v. Hughes. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 125, Noonan v. Bradley. 
 
 b 16 Wall. 29, Voorhees v. Bone- 
 steel. 
 
 c 17 Wall. 62, Olcotfc v. Bynum. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 652, Hornbuckle v. 
 Toombs. 
 
 d98 U. S. 59, Peters ». Bowman. 
 
 NOEEIS, BKOOKS v. See Brooks v. Norris. 
 
 NOKKIS V. CROCKER, 13 H. 439. 
 
 Statutes prescribing different 
 penalties; repeal by implication, a 
 
 When repeal takes away jurisdic- 
 tion; pending cases, b ■. 
 
 a 17 H. 90, U. S. v. Packages. 
 b 5 Wall, 544, Ins. Co. v. Ritchie. 
 6 7 Wall. 514, ex^arfeMcCardle. 
 b 9 Wall. 575, Assessor v. Osborii. 
 a 11 Wall. 93, U. S. v. Tynen. 
 a 97 U. S. 552, U. S. v. Claflln. 
 b 98 U. S. 401, E. R. Co. ». Grant. 
 
214 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 NORBIS V. JACKSON, » "WaU. 1S7. 
 
 U. S. courts; trial without jury; 
 fluding of facts ; review by Supreme 
 Court ; act of 1865 (13 St. 501). a 
 
 Bills of exceptions. 6 
 
 a 9 Wall. 251, Barney wSchmeider 
 a 12 Wall. 301, Miller v. Ins. Co. 
 & ir Wall. 411, Eeed i>. Gardner. 
 a 18 Wall. 248, Ins. Co. v. Folsotn. 
 a 21 Wall. 160, Ins. Co. v. Sea. 
 a 21 Wall. 307, Jennisons v. Leon- 
 ard. 
 a 92 U. S. 473, Tyng b. Grinnell. 
 a 93 U. S. 81, Eyan v. Carter. 
 a 94 U. S. 798, Melendv v. Rice. 
 a 98 U. S. 443, The Abbotsford. 
 See Tool Co. v. Norris. 
 See 'Williams ^. Norris. 
 
 See Houseman v. The N. Carolina. 
 
 NOKBIS, TOOL CO. t. 
 
 NOEBIS, TVZLLIAMS v, 
 
 NOBTH CABOLINA, THE, HOUSEMAN T 
 
 NOBTHEBN BEI.I.E, THE, 9 TTall. 586. 
 
 Wharfage; canal boats and tugs, a [ a 95 U. S. 74, exparte The Easton. 
 
 NOETHEBN IND. B. K. T. MICH. CEN. K. B. CO., 15 H. 333. 
 
 U. S. courts; absent parties, a ) a 6 Wall. 286, Barney K.Baltimore. 
 
 NOETHEBN RAILEOAD v. PEOPLE, 13 WaU. 388. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to I a 16 Wall. 352, Mai-queze v. Bloom. 
 State court; Federal question, a \ 
 
 NOBTHEBNER, THE, v. THE BESOLUTE. See Eesolute «. Nortliemer. 
 
 NOBTHUP, VAUGHAN v. See Yaughan v. Northup. 
 
 NOBTON, GBAHAM v. See Graham i>. Nortoa. 
 
 NORTON, INS. CO. v. See Ins. Co. v. Norton. 
 
 NOBTON, MEADEB v. See Meader v. Norton. 
 
 NOETON, NE"WEUL, v. See NeweU V. Norton. 
 
 NORTON, U. S. V. See U. S. ■«. Norton. 
 
 NORTON, WARNER v. See Warren v. Norton. 
 
 NORWOOD, OWENS v. See Owens v. Norwooti. 
 
 NOUBSE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Nonrse. 
 
 NUDD V. BUBROWS, 91 U. S. 441. 
 
 U.S. courts; practice and pi-o- 
 cedure to conform to that of the 
 State courts; act of 1872 (17 Stat. 
 197). a 
 
 Charge to jury. 6 
 
 NUGENT M. BOYD, 3 H. 426. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; mortgages, a 
 Jurisdiction of District Court. 6 
 Assignees; suits in State courts. <; 
 
 NUGENT T. SUPERVISORS, 19 Wall. 841, 
 
 _ Municipal and county bonds in 
 aid of railroads ; subscriptions ; ef- 
 fect of consolidation, a 
 
 a 93 U. S. 299, Ind. R. R. v. Hoi-st. 
 6 95 U. S. 166, Con. Im.Co. v. Stead 
 a 97 U. S. 584, Newcomb v. Wood; 
 b 97 U. S. 696, Ruchu. Rock Island. 
 
 a 6 H. 506, Houston v. City Bank. 
 6 23 Wall. 1.34, Rayu Nosewortliy. 
 c 93 U. S. 135, Clafliiiu Houseman 
 
 a 92 U.S. 635, Moultrie v. Sav. Bank 
 a 94 U.S. 803, E. Lincoln v. Daven- 
 port. 
 a 97 U.S. 89, Bates Co. v. Winters. 
 
 NYE, MATTINGLT v. See Mattingly „. Nye 
 
 NTE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Nye. 
 
 OAKEY V. BENNETT, 11 H. 44. 
 
 infiSoI^e!'"''^"'^"'"'"'"^"'^^^''''' I "" ^^ ^''"- ^^^' Hampton f. Rouse. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 215 
 
 OAKXEY, BAJSTK OF COLUMBIA v. See Bank of Columbia v. Oakley. 
 GATES T. XATIONAt BANK, 100 U. S. 839. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 31, R.K. Co.a.Nat.B'k 
 
 Negotiable paper; bona-flde hold- 
 ers fm- value hi usual course of trade; 
 coUatei-al security for antecedent 
 debt ; U. S. courts not bound by 
 State decisions on qitestions of gen- 
 eral law. a 
 
 O'BKIEN V. PERRY, 1 Bl. 115. 
 
 Laud olHcers ; when jurisdiction | a 1 Wall. 115, Minnesota v. Bacliel- 
 final. a \ der. 
 
 OCEAN rNS. CO. T. POltETS, 13 P. 157. 
 
 Supreme Conrt ; writ of error to I a 19 H. 376, Mich. Can. E.JJ.J3o^ v 
 State court ; Federal question, a \ 
 
 O'CONNEK, COOIiET v. See Cooley v. O'Connor, 
 OCTAVIA, THE, 1 Wh. 84. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction, a 
 
 O'DOWB V. RUSSEI-L, 14 Wall. 405 
 
 Supreme Court ; supersedeas, a 
 
 Mich. Sou. R.R. Co. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 638, The Belfast. 
 
 Writs of error; joinder of parties; 
 severance, b 
 
 OEI-BICKS V. FOKD, 23 H. 63. 
 
 Agency ; parol evidence, u. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 664, Board of Clom'rs v. 
 
 Gorman. 
 b 20 Wall. 158, Simpson u. Greeley. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 704, JTasli v. Towne. 
 a 14 Wall. 603, The Delaware. 
 
 OGDEN T. BLACKIEDGB, a Cr. 873. 
 
 State I/Cgislatures ; judicial func- i a 2 P. 407, Satterlee v. Matthewson. 
 tions. a I 
 
 OGDEN, FITZSrStMONS v. See Fitzsimmons v. Ogden. 
 OGDEX, GIBBONS V. See Gibbons v. Ogden. 
 OGDEN, GORDON v. See Gordon v. Ogden, 
 OGDEN V. PARSONS, 83 H. 168. 
 
 Evidence ; experts, a 
 
 OGDEN V. SAUNDERS, 13 Wli. 813, 
 
 State insolvent laws; constitu- 
 tionality of; obligation of con- 
 tracts, a 
 
 Ex post f icto and retrospective 
 laws, b 
 
 Police power of the States, c 
 
 Assignment under foreign bank- 
 rupt law ; will not prevail against 
 attachment in U. S. d 
 
 Negotiable paper ; indorsers. e 
 
 I a 99 U. S. 658, Spring Co. v. Edgar. 
 
 a P. 348, Boyle v. Zacharie. 
 6 8 P. 108, Watson v. Mercer, 
 ffl 9 P. 355, Beers v. Haughtou. 
 c 11 P. 130, New York v. Miln. 
 a 14 P. 72, Suydam v. Broadnax. 
 a 5 H. 307, Cook v. Moffat. 
 a 6 n. 318, Plant. Bank v. Sharp. 
 b 10 H. 396, Bait. & Susq. K. E. Co. 
 
 V. Nesbit. 
 d 17 H. 337, Booth v. Clark. 
 a ] Wall. 209, Baldwin v. Hale. 
 a 1 AVall. 239, Baldwin v. Bank. 
 a 4 Wall. 550, Van Hoffman v. 
 
 Quincy. 
 a 15 Wall. 326, State Tax Foreign 
 
 Held Bonds. 
 d 16 Wall. 627, Crapo v. Kelly. 
 e 22 Wall. .589, Koss v. Jones. 
 
 OGILVIE V. KNOX INS. CO., 18 H. 579. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 
 a 3 Wall. 256, Daniels v. R. R. Co. 
 
216 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPEBMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 OGIXVIB T. KNOX INS. CO., »» H. 
 
 Corporations; liability of stock- 
 holders for unpaid calls, a 
 Parties to suits ; how made, b 
 Personal liability of stockhold- 
 
 O6I.I: V. IBB, a Cr. 33. 
 
 Certiiieates of division, a 
 
 O'HAKA T. V. S., 15 P. 876. 
 
 Florida land titles, a 
 Incomplete titles. 6 
 
 OHIO, FOX V. See Fox v. OMo. 
 
 380. 
 
 a 2B1, 
 
 a 91 U. 
 
 6 94 U. 
 
 6 95 U. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 668, Chubb v. Upton. 
 
 c 101 U. S. 210, Hatch v. Dana. 
 
 540, Ogrilvie v. Ins. Co. 
 S. 48, Upton cTrebiloock 
 S. 21, cK^arfe Cutting. 
 S. 636, Terry v. Anderson 
 
 a 2 Bl. 434, Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 a 3 Wall. 255, Daniels v. K. E. Co. 
 
 a 16 P. 155, U. S. V. Miranda. 
 6 3 H. 784, U. S. ». Kin^. 
 6 11 H. 124, Lecompte j». U. S. 
 
 OHIO, 
 OHIO 
 
 FKANKtlN BANK v. See Franklin Bank v. Ohio. 
 F. MAKCT, 18 WaU. 553. 
 
 Sup. Court : objections must first 
 be taken in court below, a 
 
 Findings of facts; trial without 
 jury. 6 
 
 OHIO, NEIL V. See Nell v. Ohio. 
 OHIO, SHIELDS t. See Shields u. Ohio. 
 OHIO, THE, XJDALL t. See Udall v. The Ohio. 
 OHIO MFE & TKCST CO. V. DBBOLT, 16 H. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 418, Mays ». Pritton. 
 6 21 Wall. 161, Ins. Co. b. Sea. 
 
 435. 
 
 Corporations ; grants to, con- 
 strued in favor of tlie public, a 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tract ; cannot be impaired by sub- 
 sequent legislation or decisions. 6 
 
 Exemption from taxation, c 
 
 U. S. courts ; jurisdiction where 
 a State is interested in the suit; 
 court wUl not look beyond the rec- 
 ord, d 
 
 Judicial notice, e 
 
 OHIO & MISSISSIPPI B. B. CO. v. TFHBEI.EE, 1 Bl. 297. 
 
 1 Bl. 380, Eice v. E. K. Co. 
 1 Willi. 206, GelpckeuDubuque 
 8 WaU. 438, Home,&c.,»Eonse 
 13 Wall. 376, Salt Co. v. East 
 Saginaw. 
 221, Davis v. Gray. 
 61, E. E. V. Maguire. 
 43, Brown v. Piper. 
 6 101 U. S. 686, Douglas u Pike Co. 
 
 16 Wall. 
 20 Wall. 
 91 U. S. 
 
 U. S. courts ; citizenship of cor- 
 porations, a 
 
 O'KEEFE, U. S. V. See U. S. i). O'Keefe. 
 OI-COTT V. BTNTIM, 17 TTaU. 66. 
 
 U. S. courts ; when bound by the 
 decisions of the State courts, a 
 
 Mortgages ; power to sell. 6 
 
 U. S. courts ; administer the law 
 of the State, c 
 
 What the mortgage covers, d 
 
 Surplus after sale, e 
 
 Sale as an entirety, f 
 
 a 8 Wall. 178, Paul v. Virginia. 
 a 11 Wall. 216, Ins. Co. v. Francis. 
 a 12 Wall. 82, R. E. Co. v. Harris. 
 a 13 Wall. 283, E. E. v. Whitton. 
 a 18 Wall. 575, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 a 20 Wall. 454, Ills. Co. v. Morse. 
 
 a 
 
 91 U. 
 
 S 
 
 b 
 
 92 U. 
 
 S 
 
 a 
 
 94 U. 
 
 S 
 
 c 
 
 96 U. 
 
 S 
 
 a 
 
 97 U. 
 
 S 
 
 d 
 
 97 U. 
 
 S 
 
 e 
 
 98 U. 
 
 S 
 
 c 
 
 98 U. 
 
 S 
 
 d 101 U. 
 
 S 
 
 /102 U. 
 
 S 
 
 485, Lloyd v. Fulton. 
 151, Markey u.Langley 
 770, Lippincott v. Mit- 
 chell. 
 635, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 277, Macou Co. v Siiores 
 453, Hill V. Nat. Bank. 
 54, Kesner v. Trigg. 
 244, Slaughter v. Glenn 
 288, Jeffrey v. Moran. 
 594, Springer v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 217 
 
 OrCOTT V. SUPERVISORS, 16 Wall 
 
 Municiptil aid to railroads; power 
 of Legislature to autliorize. a 
 
 U. S. courts ; when bound b}' de- 
 cisions of tlif> State courts. 6 
 
 Taxation lor private object, c 
 
 Kecitals In the bonds; conditions; 
 estoppel ; bona-tide holders, d 
 
 OLIVER V. AXBXANDER, 6 P. 143. 
 
 Admiralty; joint and several de- 
 crees; appeals to Supreme Court; 
 amount in dispute, a 
 
 OUVER, GILl V. See G-ill v. Oliver. 
 
 678. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 91, Queensbiiryt;. Cul- 
 ver. 
 6 19 Wall. 678, Pine Grove v. Tal- 
 
 cott. 
 c 20 Wall. 662, Loan As. v Topeka 
 d 94 U. S. 204, Cora'rs w. January 
 b 94 U. S. 642, Com'rs v. Thayer. 
 6 100U. S. 52, Fairfield u Gallatin 
 
 a 11 H. 525, Spear ». Place. 
 a 12 H. 352, Rich u. Lambert. 
 a 17 H. 4, Sliields v. Thomas. 
 a 5 Wall. 210, Seaveru. Bigelow. 
 a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Pettv. 
 o 100 U. S. 148, Paving v. Muliord 
 
 OI.IVER V. MARTLAiTD INS. CO., 1 Cr. 487. 
 
 Marine insurance ; deviations, a | a 12 Wh. ,383, Ins. Co. v. Catlett. 
 
 OtrVTER -v. PIATT, 3 H. 333. 
 
 When iigent cannot acquire in- 
 terest in subject-matter of agency 
 adverse to hi.s principal, a 
 
 Equitable title. 6 
 
 Trust fund ; wlien it can be fol- 
 lowed, c 
 
 Bona-fide purchasers, d 
 
 a 4 H. 552, Michoud v. Girod. 
 6 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 c 6 Wall. 316, Clements v. Moore, 
 c 9 Wall. 607, ex parte Morris & 
 
 Johnson. 
 d 11 Wall. 232, May «. LeOlaii-e. 
 rf]2 Wall. 339, Villa v. Rodriguez, 
 c 98 U. S. 245, Slaughter!). Glenn. 
 
 OMVER, PIATT V. See Piatt v. Oliver. 
 OLIVER, WILLIAMS v. See Williams v. Oliver. 
 OLNEY V. THE FALCON, 17 H. 19. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter I a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill u. Petty. 
 in dispute, a I 
 
 OLPHERT, MEBKS v. See Meeks v. Olphert. 
 OMAHUNDRO, COOPER v. See Cooper v. Omahundro. 
 ORCHARD V. HUGHES, 1 Wall. 75. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a a 7 Wall. 346, Thompson w. Dean. 
 Territorial courts, b 6 13 Wall. 448, Clinton v. Engle- 
 
 brechdt. 
 6 18 Wall. 652, Hornbuoklc v. 
 
 Toomlis. 
 
 ORDWAY, GODDARD T. See G-oddard v. Ordway. 
 OREGON, LANE v. Sec Lane v. Oregon. 
 OREGON, THE, v. ROCCA, 18 H. 670. 
 
 Collision; steamers and sailing I a 21 H. 384, 8. S. Co. v. Rumball. 
 vessels, a I a 22 H. 472, Trans. Co. v. Nav. Co. 
 
 O'REILLT V. EDRINGTON, 96 U. S. 713. 
 
 Supreme Court; supersedeas, a | a 96 U. S. 738, Bank v. Omaha. 
 
218 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 0'KEIL,L,Y V. MORSE, 15 H. 106. 
 
 Patent law ; Morse's patents for 
 
 telegrapli. a 
 Disclaimers. 6 
 
 Sppcifioatioii ; what it covers, c 
 Surrender of old and issue of 
 
 new patent, d 
 What is patentable,, e • 
 Patents for processes, f 
 
 ORLEANS V. PIATT, 99 V. S. 677. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; conditions; recitals; estop- 
 pel ; bona-fide purchasers, a 
 
 a 15 H. 140, Smith v. Ely. 
 
 6 19 H. 105, Seymour u McCorraick 
 
 c 1 Wall. 576, Burr v. Dnryee. 
 
 d 11 Wall. 545, Seymour v. Os- 
 borne. 
 
 e 19 Wall. 392, Mitchell v. Tighl- 
 man. 
 S. 194, Dunbar v. Myers. 
 S. 725, Tilghman «. Proc- 
 tor. 
 
 b 94 U. 
 / 102 U. 
 
 a 99 U. 8. 684, Lyons v. Munson. 
 a 101 U. S. 204, Pompton v. Union 
 a 102 U. S. 290, Buchanan a. Litcli- 
 field. 
 
 ORLEANS, THE STEAMBOAT, v. PHOEBUS, 11 P. 175. 
 
 Maritime coniracts ; admiralty 
 juri.sdiction ; tide water, a 
 
 Liens by State laws ; when U. S. 
 courts will enforce, b 
 
 Disputes between part owners of 
 ships, c 
 
 Who have maritime liens, d 
 
 OBLEY, TUCKER v. 
 
 a 5 H. 452, Warino- v. CUivk. 
 a 6B. 37S, Navisatiou Co.v Bank 
 o 12 IL 450, Gen. Cliief uFitzhuo-h 
 a 20 H. 167, Grant v. Poillon. 
 6 21 H. 251, Maguire v. Card. 
 a 22 H. 131, Roach v. Cliapman. 
 c 22 H. 332, Ward v. Thompson. 
 6 1 Bl. 529, Tfie St. L.iwrence. 
 a 4 Wall. 562, The Hine & Trevor. 
 b 13 Wall. 243, ex paHe MciSTeill. 
 & 21 Wall. 579. Tlie Lottowanna. 
 d 93 U. S. 365, Norton v. Switzer. 
 See Tucker v. Orley. 
 
 a 8 Wli. 480, Society D.N. Haven 
 a 9 Wh. 489, Huolies ». Edwards 
 b 18 H. 236, McKinney i>. Saviego. 
 a 100 U. S. 489, Ilauenstein y Lyii- 
 Iiam. 
 
 [ a 101 U. S. 375, Phelps ». Harris. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 640, Bank «. Creswell. 
 
 ORB V. HODGSON, 4 Wh. 453. 
 
 Alienage; treaty of peace with 
 Giv.'it Britain, a 
 
 Estates of aliens ; when thej- 
 vest in the State without inquest. 6 
 
 ORTON V. SMITH, 18 H. 363. 
 
 Equity ; cloud on title, a 
 ORTEGA, U. S. V. See U. S. i,. Ortega 
 OBVIS V. POWELL, 98 U. S. 176. 
 
 U.S. coHi'ts ; foreclosure of mort- 
 gages; rule of decision ; alien.ation 
 of property; how lien enforced, a 
 
 OSBOKN, PULLIAM v. See Pulliam v. Osbom. 
 
 OSBOBN, THOMAS v. See Thomas v. Osborn. 
 
 OSBORN V. U. S., 91 U. S. 474. 
 
 P''""''""- « 1 a 95 U. S. 153, Knote t). U. S 
 
 OSBORNE, innHASi V. See Lyman v. Osborne. 
 OSBORNE V. MOBILE, 16 Wall. 479. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce ; concurrent powers, a 
 Exemption from taxation. 6 
 
 a 17 Wall. 570, R. R. Co. v. Fuller. 
 b 20 Wall. 42, Pac. R. v. Mngnirc. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 219 
 
 OSBOBN V. BANK OF THE U. S., 9 
 
 Bank of the U. S.; right to sue 
 in the U. S. courts, a 
 
 Corporation ; liow an appearance 
 must be euteretl for. b 
 
 Jurisdiction of U. S. courts ; 
 suits by Postmaster-General, c 
 
 Where jurisUiction depends on 
 the party, it is tlie party named in 
 the record, d 
 
 Powers of the State Legislatures 
 when not restrained by the Federal 
 Constitution, e 
 
 Jurisdiction in equity. / 
 
 By injunction, g 
 
 Parties ; when proper, h 
 
 When suit must be brought by 
 the corporation, i 
 
 Constitution ; powers of the gen- 
 eral government cannot be ob- 
 structed by State legislation, j 
 
 Writs of error to State court; 
 Federal question, k 
 
 State power to tax; investment 
 in Federal securities. I 
 
 U. S. courts ; suits between citi- 
 zens of different States; jurisdic- 
 tion, m 
 
 An unconstitutional law a nul- 
 lity, n 
 
 State officers enforcing such a law 
 can be sued, o 
 
 9 Wh. 904, U. S. Banlv v. Bank. 
 10 Wli. 406, Wash'gton u Young 
 12 Wh. 144, P'm.-Gen. W.Early. 
 
 1 P. 118, Georgia v. Madrazo. 
 4 P. 559, Piov. Bank v Billings 
 7 P. 252, Vattier v. Hinde. 
 
 10 P. 59G, Brent v. Bank of W. 
 
 2 H. 550, K. R. Co. v. Letson. 
 9H. 2o, Irwin D. Dixion. 
 
 17 H. 137, Shields v. Barrow. 
 
 18 H. 336, Dodge v. Wol?ey. 
 21 H. 592, Barber v. Barber. 
 
 2 Bl. 628, Bank of Com. u. N. Y. 
 6 Wall. 253, Mavor v. Cooper. 
 6 Wall. 285, Barney v. Balt'me 
 6 Wall. 607, Society v. Coit. 
 
 11 Wall. 175, Coal Co. v. Blatch- 
 ford. 
 
 m 13 Wall. 67, Rice v. Houston. 
 
 d 16 Wall. 220, Davis v. Gray. 
 
 )■ 18 Wall. 34, R. R. v. Peniston. 
 
 j 91 U. S. 33, Far. Nat. Bank v. 
 Dearing. 
 
 n 92 U. S. 541, Board u. McComb. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 135, Claflin v. House- 
 man. 
 
 m 96 U. S. 201, Gold Co. v. Keys. 
 
 c 100 U. S. 264, Tennessee v Davis 
 
 j 100 U. S. 543, People v. Weaver. 
 
 100 U. S. 560, Newton v. Com'rs 
 
 k 102 U. S. 141, R. R. Co. v. Miss. 
 
 OSBOBNE V. NICHOLSON, 13 WaU. 548. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- I a 18 Wall. 548, Boyce v. Tabb. 
 tracts ; notes for sale of slaves, a | a 92 U. S. 31, Hall v. U. S. 
 
 OSBOKNE, SETMOUB t. See Seymour v. Osborne. 
 OSBOBNES, ASSESSOR v. See Assessor v. Osbomes. 
 OSIO, XT. S. T. See U. S. v. Oslo. 
 OSWAI.D V. NEW YORK, 3 Ball. 415 
 
 Supreme Court; original jurisdic- 
 tion ; eleventh amendment Consti- 
 tution ; suits against States, a 
 
 OSWEGO, MABCT v. See Marcy v. Oswego 
 
 OTIS T. BACON, 7 Cr. 589 
 
 a 5 P. 284, New Jersey v. N. Y. 
 a 24 H. 95, Kentucky v. Dennison 
 
 Embargo acts ; what is a termi- 
 nation of a voyage, a 
 
 a 2 Wh. 21, Otis v. Walter. 
 a 6 Wh. .583, Otis v. Walter. 
 a 11 Wh. 192, Otis v. Walter. 
 
 OTIS, BOSWEIiL V. See Boswell v. Otis 
 
 OTIS V. cuLtoat 9a v. s. 447. 
 
 Negotiable paper; want of con- 
 sideration ; recovery back of money 
 paid, a 
 
 OTOE, KAHiKOAB CO. v. See Eailroad Co. v. Otoe. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 679, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 
220 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPRBiME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 OTTOWA, THE, 3 WaU. 868. 
 
 Collision ; steamers and sailing I a 6 Wall. 224, The Hypodame. 
 vessels; lookouts, a \ 
 
 OUACHITA COTTON, 6 Wall. 5)81. 
 
 Civil war: licenses to ti-ade. a I a 7 Wall. 556, Coppell u. Hall. 
 
 I a 8 Wall. 167, McKee «. U. S. 
 
 OVERMAN, FARKEB v. Sea Parker i). Orerman. 
 
 OVERTON V. CHEEK, 88 H. 46. 
 
 Sup. Court ; writof error; seal, a | a 6 H. 558, Ins. Co. b. Halloek. 
 OWENS, BANK OF THE U. S. v. See Bank of the U. S. o. Owens. 
 OWINGS V. HUr.1-, 9 P. 607. 
 
 Evidence ; certified copies of pub- 
 lic documents a 
 
 Laws of U. S. ; proof of. h 
 
 Civil law; evidence; protocols, c 
 
 Laws of the States ; judicial no- 
 tice. A 
 
 OWINGS V. KINCANNON, 7 P. 399. 
 
 Supreme Court; appeals; joint 
 decree, a 
 
 a U P. 344. IT. S. v. Wiggins. 
 b 14 H. 41;!. Ennis v. Smith. 
 a 17 I-I. 610, Gnfflii v. Reynolds. 
 c 21 H. 175, U. S. I'. Sutter. 
 d 12 Wall. 229, K. R. Co. v. Banlt. 
 c 20 Wall. 284, McPhaulu. Lapsley 
 
 a 12 P. 140, Wilson v. Ins. Co. 
 a 16 P. 522, Todd v. Daniel. 
 a 20 P. 288, Mussina v. Cavazos. 
 a 6 Wall. 362, Mussina i). Cavazos. 
 a 10 Wall. 417, Masterdon v. Herii- 
 
 doii. 
 a 11 Wall. 87, The Protector. 
 a 13 Wall. 188, Hampton v. Eoiise. 
 a 20 Wall. 157, Simpson v. Greeley 
 
 ■ a 5 P. 2.52, Fisher v. Cockrell. 
 
 a 10 P. 368, Crowell v. Randall. 
 : 6 10 H. 322, Henderson v. Tenn. 
 
 b 20 H. 4, Wynn v. Morris. 
 \b 1 Bl. 473, Verden !>. Coleman. 
 1 6 91 U. S. 113, Long v. Converse. 
 
 a 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 OWINGS V. NORWOOD, 6 Cr. 344. 
 
 Writs of error to State courts ; 
 how the Federal question must be 
 shown, a 
 
 Party must claim right under the 
 Constitution for himself. 6 
 
 OWINGS V. SPEED, 5 Wll. 480. 
 
 Writ of error to State court; 
 Federal question ; validity of law 
 of State passed before the Union 
 cannot be considered, a 
 
 OVnNGS v. TIEBNAN, 10 P. 84. 
 
 Supreme Court; practice; rule a 15 P. 285, Gwin t). Breedlove. 
 43 ; docketing and dismissing caus- a 7 H. 785, Van Rensselaer v. 
 es. a Watts. 
 
 Costs. 6 a 3 Wall. 103, Sparrow ». Strong. 
 
 b 94 U. S. 254, Selma R. R. Co.d. 
 
 Bank. 
 a 102 U. S. 576, Edwards v. U. S. 
 OWINGS V. WICKLEBTE. See Wickliffe v. Owings. 
 OWINGS, W^OODS T. See Woods v. Owings. 
 OXFORD, ]u:cCI,IIRE V. See McOlure v. Oxiord. 
 OXI.EY, TUCKER V. See Tucker D.Oxley. 
 PACABD, VAN NESS v. See Van Ness v. Pacard. 
 PACHECO, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Paoheoo. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 221 
 
 PACIFIC INS. CO., CONARD v. See Oonard v. Pacific Ins. Co. 
 PACIFIC INS. CO., DORR v. See Dorr d. Pacific Ins. Co. 
 PACIFIC INS. CO. V. SOULE, 7 Wall. 440. 
 
 Constitution ; direct taxes, a 
 
 a 8 Wall. 547, Veazie Bank v. 
 
 Penno. 
 a 23 Wall. 348, Scholey v. Reid. 
 a 102 U. S. 601, Springer v. U. S. 
 
 PACIFIC MAIX S. S. CO., HATS v. See Hays v. Pacific Mail S. S. Co. 
 PACIFIC K. K. V. MAGUIRE, !J0 WaU. 48. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 1 a 22 Wall. 226, Bailey v. Magwire. 
 tracts ; exemption from taxation, a \ 
 
 PACKARD, DATIS v. See Davis v. Packard. 
 PACKER T. NIXON, 10 P. 411. 
 
 Certificates of division, a a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Chicago. 
 
 a 24 H. 306, Wiggins v. Gray. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 581, U. S. v. Eosenburgh 
 PACKET CO., ATUEE v. See Atlee v. Paclset Oo. 
 PACKET CO. V. CtOUGH, 30 WaU. 588. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 157, Ins. Co. v. Mahone. 
 6 21 Wall. 262, K. R. Co. v. Smith. 
 
 Agents; admissions; when evi- 
 dence against principal, a 
 Exceptions to evidence. 6 
 
 PACKET CO. V. KEOKUK, 95 U. S. 80. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- I a 100 U. S. 428, Pack. Co v St Louis 
 merce ; wharfage, a \ a 100 U. S. 443, Guy v. Baltimore. 
 
 PACKET CO. T. McCHE, 17 Wall. 513. 
 
 Corporations; liability for inju- | a 17 Wall. 559, R. R. Co. v. Port, 
 ries to employees, a I 
 
 PACKET CO. V. ST. lOTJIS, 100 V. S. 423. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- i a 100 U. S. 432, Vieksburg». Tobin 
 merce ; wharfage, a \ a 100 U. S. 443, Guy v. Baltimore. 
 
 PACKET CO. T. SICKLES, S Wall. 590. 
 
 Judgments ; conclusiveness ; res l a 94 U. S. 608, Russell v. Place, 
 judicata, a \ 
 
 PACKET CO. V. SICKLES, 19 Wall. 617. 
 
 Patent law; damages; profits, o | a 92 U. S. 720, Burdell v. Denig. 
 
 I a 93 U. S. 70, Birdsall v. Coolidge 
 
 PACKWOOD, DORSET v. See Dorsey v. Paekwood. 
 PADELFORD, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Padeltord. 
 PAGE T. BANK OF AiEXAJOJRIA, 7 Wh. 35. 
 
 Negotiable paper; note evidence a 6 H. 36, Bank of U. S. v. Moss, 
 of money had and received ; suit in 
 U. S. court by assignee ; section 11 
 judiciary act. a 
 
 PAGE, FLEMING v. See Fleming v. Page. 
 PAGE, GAXPIN V. See Galpin v. Page. 
 PAGE, HOGAN v. See Hogan v. Page. 
 PAGE, PHrLUFS v. See Phillips v. Page. 
 PAGE, STEARNS v. See Stearns v. Page. 
 
 PAHQUIOQUE BANK, BANK OF BETHEL v. See Bank of Bethel v. 
 Pahquioque Bank. 
 
222 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 PAYNE, I-AMBERT v. See Lambert v. Payne. 
 PAINE, ST. JOHN V. See St, John v. Paine. 
 PAIAO, HUNT V. See Hunt 11. Palao. 
 PALMER V. ALIEN, 7 Cr. 550. 
 
 Process acts ; adoption by U. S. a 10 Wli. 1, Wyman v. Southard, 
 courts of State practice, a o 6 P. 648, Boyle v. Zacharie. 
 
 a 1 H. 304, Duncan v. Darst. 
 PAXMBK, GBACIE v. See G-raeie v. Palmer. 
 PALMEB V. MAESTON, 14 Wall. 10. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to I a 14 Wall. 666, Delmas «. Ins. Co. 
 State court; Federal question. a \ 
 
 PAIMER, V. S. V. See U. S. «. Palmer. 
 PALMER V. U. S., S4 H. 136. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; rec- I a 24 H. 351, TJ. S. v. Castro, 
 ord evidence, a | a 1 Wall. 745, Komero v. TT. 8. 
 
 PAIiMTTRA, THE, 10 Wh. 508. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals ; final 
 decrees, a 
 
 Admiralty; seizures for illegal 
 acts ; proceedings in rem ; con- 
 demnation of vessel. 6 
 
 Amendments ; power to allow at 
 subsequent term, c 
 
 Amendments in admiralty cases.d 
 
 Keinstatement of appeals by Su- 
 preme Court, e 
 
 PALMYRA, THE, 12 TTh. 1. 
 
 Admiralty; stipulators, a 
 Proceedings in rem; forfeitures. 6 
 
 a 11 Wh. 429, Cliace v. Vasquez. 
 
 a 12 Wh. 1, The Palmyra. 
 
 o 3 P. 316, Canter «. Am. Ins. Co. 
 
 a 12 P. 491, ex parte Sibbald. 
 
 6 2 H. 220, U. S. V. Brig Malek. 
 
 c 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 
 a 15 H. 464, Corn Ingu Nail Factory 
 
 b 18 H. Ill, Jeckerw. Montgomery. 
 
 a 19 H. 284, Beebe v. Lawrence. 
 
 d 21 H. 85, Rice ». Minn. & N. W. 
 E. R. Co. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 110, Humiston v. Stain- 
 thorp. 
 
 e 6 Wall. 458, Alviso v. U. S. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 611, The Wanata. 
 
 6 96 U. S. 1, Dobbins's Distillery 
 
 a 99 U. S. 36, U. S. v. Ames. 
 
 PARCELS V. JOHNSON, 80 WaU. 653. 
 
 Sup. Court; final judgments, a 
 
 PARGOUD V. V. S., 13 Wall. 157. 
 
 Pardon ; effect of. a 
 
 a 91 U. S. 2, McComb v. Cotn'rs. 
 a 92 U. S. 179, Baker v. White. 
 a 94 a. S. 517, Davis v. Crouch. 
 
 152, Carlisle «. U. S. 
 
 153, Knote v. U. S. 
 
 I a 16 Wall 
 
 I a 95 U. S 
 PARHAM, MORGAN v. See Morgan 11. Parham. 
 PARHAM, WOODRUFF v. See Woodrnff ». Parham. 
 PARISH V. ElMS, 16 P. 458. 
 
 U. S. courts ; law and equity I a 21 H. 482, Fenn v. Holme 
 must be kept separate, a \ 
 
 PARKER V. OVERMAN, 18 H. 140. 
 
 Tax titles, a 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; citi- 
 zenship ; liow it must appear. 6 
 
 PARKER V. PHETTIPLACE, 1 WaU. 684. 
 
 Equity; answer; evidence, a | a 2 Wall. 430, Tobey». Leonards. 
 
 a 21 H. 342, Thomas «. Lawson. 
 6 97 U. S. 648, Robertson v. Cease. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 223 
 
 PARKER V. RULE, 9 Cr. 64. 
 
 Tax 'iiiles. a i a 4 Wh. 78, Williams v. Poylon. 
 
 I o 16 H. 615, Early v. Doe. 
 PARKER, RUSH v. See EasVi v. Parker. 
 PARKER V. WINNIPISEOGEE CO., 2 Bl. 551. 
 
 Equity; no juiiwliction where 
 
 a 
 
 there is complete remedy at law, 
 
 Wlieu objection to wjiiit of juiis- 
 dictioii must be raised. 6 
 
 PARKS, EX PARTE, 93 U. S. 18. 
 
 Supreme Court ; habeas corpus ; i 
 void and voidable judgments, a \ 
 
 PARKS V. ROSS, 11 H. 393. 
 
 Instructions; when the court may 
 direct the jurjf to find a verdict, a 
 
 a 1 Wall. 22, Wright v. Ellison. 
 a 13 Wall. 621, Ins. Co. v. Bailey. 
 a 15 Wall. 228, Oelrichs v. Spain. 
 6 17 Wall. 284, Tyler v. Magwn-e. 
 a 94 U. 8. 811, Sullivan ». K.R.Co. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 375, ex parte Siebold. 
 
 a 19 H. 266, Eichardson v. Bo"ton. 
 a 1 Wall. 370. Schuuhardtu Allen. 
 a 18 Wall. 251, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 a 22 Wall. 121, Pleasants v. Fant. 
 a 94 U. S. 284, Com'rs v. Clark. 
 a 100 U. S. 27, E. E. Co. v. Fraloff. 
 
 a 13 H. 214, Morsell v. Smith. 
 
 PARKS V. TURNER, 12 H. 46. 
 
 Amendment of verdicts ; jeofails I 
 (1 St. at Large 91). a \ 
 
 PARMELEE v. I/ATVRENCE, 11 TFaU. 36. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to I a 16 Wall. 189, Smith v. Adsit. • 
 State court; Federal question, a | a 92 U. S. 329, Brown v. Atwell. 
 
 PARRISH, IiOWrfSDALE v. See Lownsdale v. Parrish. 
 PARSONS V. ARMOR, 3 P. 413. 
 
 a 16 P. 172, Hyde v. Booraem. 
 a 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 6 12 Wall. 281, Kearney v. Case. 
 
 a 9 P. 652, Livingston v. Story. 
 a 10 P. 610, Brent v. Bank Wash'n. 
 a 10 P. 452, Parish v. Ellis. 
 u, 2 H. 392, Minor v. Tillotson. 
 a 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 a 19 H. 276, Hipp v. Babin. 
 6 20 H. 558, Irvine v. Marshall. 
 c 21 H. 107, Barreda v. Silsby. 
 a 21 EI. 482, Fenn v. Holme. 
 d 6 Wall. 758, Smith v. Cockrell. 
 c 9 Wall. 277, Justices v. Murray, 
 c 12 Wall. 300, Miller u. L. Ins. Co. 
 c 16 Wall. 269, Ins.Co.u. Comstock 
 c 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. c. Folsom. 
 c 94 U. S. 657, Crim v. Handley. 
 c 98 U. S. 445, The Abbotsford. 
 c 100 U. S. 32, E. E. Co. v. Fraloff. 
 c 101 U. S. 808, Trenier v. Stewart. 
 
 PARSONS, OGBEN v. See Ogden v. Parsons. 
 PASCHAL, EX PARTE, 10 Wall. 483. 
 
 Attorneys' liens, a | a 96 U. S. 417, McPherson v. Cox. 
 
 Bills of exception, a 
 Jury ; waiver of trial by ; find- 
 ing of facts, b 
 
 PARSONS V. BEDFORD, 3 P. 444. 
 
 Louisiana ; practice of U. S. 
 courts; act of 1824; equity juris- 
 diction must be kept separate. a 
 
 Judicial power of the U. S.; cases 
 at common lawand cases in equitj'.ft 
 
 Facts found by jury cannot be 
 re-examined except according to 
 the rules of the common law. c 
 
 U. S. courts ; process, d 
 
224 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 PASSENGER CASES, 1 H. 398. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of oom- 
 meice ; duties on imports, a 
 Police power. 6 
 Eight of State to tax ships, c 
 
 a 3 Wall. 730, Gilmanu. Philad'a. 
 a 6 Wall. 40, Ci-andellu. Nevada. 
 b 9 Wall. 45. U. S. v. De Witt. 
 c 12 Wall. 213, State Ton. Tax Cap. 
 a 12 Wall. 432, Ward v. Maryland. 
 a 15 Wall. 275, State Fre't Tax Cas. 
 a 16 Wall. 475, Morgans. Parham. 
 a 92 U. S. 266, Hendersons Mayor 
 a 93 U. S. 102, Sherlock v. Ailing. 
 a 94 U. S. 542, DovlesCon.Ins.Co. 
 b 95 U. S. 471, K. E. Co. v. Hiisen. 
 6 97 U. S. 33, Beer Co. v. Mass. 
 a 97 U. S. 571, Cookc.Pennsylv'a. 
 c 99 U. S. 280, Tr. Co. v. Wheeling 
 
 PATAPSCO, THE, 13 Wall. 461. 
 
 Supreme Court ; amount in con- 
 troversy; interest, a 
 
 PATAPSCO, THE, 13 Wall. 339. 
 
 Admiralty; lien of material-men 
 for supplies in foreign port, a 
 
 PATAPSCO INS. CO. T. COTILTBK, 
 
 Insurance ; proximate cause of 
 loss; marine insurance; barratry, a 
 
 PATAPSCO INS. CO. T. SOUTHGATE, 5 P. 604. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 679, Machine Co. s.Gage 
 a 19 Wall. 189, The Eio Grande, 
 
 a 17 Wall. 669, The Emily Sender. 
 a 20 Wall. 164, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 
 3 P. 333. 
 
 a 10 P. 508, Ins. Co. v. Lawrence. 
 a 11 P. 218, Waters u. Mier. Ins. Co. 
 
 Marine insurance ; total loss. 
 
 Depositions. 6 
 
 Master ; power to sell his ship. 
 
 a 24 H. 555, Gaines v. Hennon. 
 6 6 Wall. 711, Gaines v. New Or- 
 leans. 
 
 a a 12 P. 391, Bradlie v. Md. Ins. Co. 
 
 6 11 H. 392, Fowler v. Merrill, 
 c c 6 Wall. 26, The Amelie. 
 a 9 Wall. 235, The Star of Hope. 
 PATRICK, I/OGAN v. See Logan v. Patrick. 
 
 PATTERSON, BANK. OP COLUMBIA T. See Bank of Columbia v. Patterson. 
 PATTERSON T. GAINES, 6 H. 550. 
 
 Will of Daniel Clarke (Mrs. 
 Gaines's case) ; legitimacy, a 
 
 Sale by executors without order 
 of court. 6 
 
 PATTERSON V. JENKS, 3 P. 316. 
 
 Indians; grant within Indian 
 land, when void, a 
 
 Jurisdiction U. S. courts in con- 
 flicts as to public boundaries. 6 
 
 PATTERSON v 
 
 Constitution ; 
 PATTERSON V. V. S., 3 Wh. 333. 
 
 Error; what errors court of its 
 own motion will notice ; jury; find- 
 ings must conform to issues, a 
 
 PATTERSON, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Patterson. 
 PATTERSON V. WINN, 11 Wh. 388. 
 
 Land ; patents; can be impeach- a 1 Bl. 375, Eice v. Eailroad Co. 
 ed for want of authority, a 6 11 Wall. 458, Meader v. Norton. 
 
 Belief against patent; equity. & c 18 Wall. 301, Atliins v. Disinte- 
 Statutes; construction, c grating Co. 
 
 c 93 U. S. 84, Eyan v. Carter. 
 
 a 9 P. 672, Winn v. Patterson. 
 b 12 P. 714, Ehode Island u. Massa- 
 
 oil imptt*^ 
 a 15 P. 80, Mitchell v.'xj. S. 
 
 KENTUCKY, 97 U. S. 601. 
 
 police power, a | a 101 U. S. 818, Stone w. Miss. 
 
 a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 a 12 Wall. 403, Earth v. Clise. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 225 
 
 PATTERSON V. WETN, 5 P. 341. 
 
 Land laws ; patents, a 
 
 Evidence of grant ; when second- 
 ary evidence adniissihie. b 
 
 jurisdiction U. S. courts in ques- 
 tions of boundaries between States, c 
 
 a 6 P. 728, U. S. v. Arredondo. 
 6 9 P. 746, Winn v. Patterson, 
 c 12 P. 714, Khode Island v. Mass. 
 6 21 H. 175, U. S. V. Suiter. 
 6 1 Bl. 555, U. S. V. Yallejo. 
 
 PATTERSON, "WINN v. See Winn v. Patterson. 
 PATTON, ALEXANDRIA V. See Alexandria v. Patton. 
 PATTON T. EASTON, 1 TVll. 476. 
 
 Statutes of limitations ; Tennes- 
 see act ; possession of seven years, a 
 
 PATTON V. NICHOISON, 3 Wh. 204. 
 
 Contracts ; illegality of consider- i a 4 P. 
 ation. a . | 
 
 PATTON V. TAIXOK, 7 H. 159. 
 
 Sale of lan<l ; quitclaim deed, a 
 Equity ; relief must correspond to 
 
 frame of bill. 6 
 Kemedy of purchaser for failure 
 
 of title, c 
 
 a 9 Wh. 541, Walker v. Turner, 
 a 2 P. 241, Powell v. Harman. 
 a 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 
 425, Craig v. Missouri. 
 
 a 11 H. 317, Van Bensselaer 
 Kearney. 
 
 b 19 H. 126. Baker v. Nachtrieb. 
 
 c 22 H. 328, Kefeld v. Woodfolk. 
 
 c 2 Bl. 508, Noonan v. Lee. 
 
 c 98 U. S. 60, Peters v. Bowman 
 PATTON, VIOLETT v. See Vlolett v. Patton. 
 PAXTX, BA.NE t. See Kane u. Paul. 
 PAUL T. VIRGINIA, 8 Wall. 168. 
 
 Constitution; power of the States; a 
 discriminations against foreign cor- a 
 porations ; "privileges and immu- a 
 ntties of citizens ; " commercial 6 
 power, a a 
 
 of State 
 
 Corporation ; citizen 
 where created, b 
 Eights in other States. 
 Eemovals by. d 
 
 10 Wall. 415, Ducat v. Chicago. 
 10 Wall. 573, Ins. Co. v. Mass. 
 
 12 Wall. 430, Ward u. Maryland. 
 
 13 Wall. 28 i, R. R. v. Wliitton. 
 16 Wall. 76, Slaughter-house 
 
 Cases. 
 
 b 20 Wall. 4.54, Ina. Co. v. Morse, 
 c 94 U. S. 539, Doyle v. Ins. Co. 
 c 96 U.S. 12, Tel. Co.u.Tel.Co. 
 a 96 U. S. 183, Williams w. Bruffv 
 d 98 U. S. 407, Boom Co. v. Pat- 
 terson. 
 S. 95, Trade-mark Cases 
 
 PAULDING, DECATUR v, 
 PAUP V. DREW, 10 H. 821. 
 
 Payments ; meaning of the word 
 dollars, a 
 
 PAWLET V. CLARK, 9 Cr. 292. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction where 
 lands are claimed under grants of 
 difterent States, a 
 
 Religions uses ; need no particular 
 grantee, b 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; revocation of grant, c 
 
 alOOU. 
 See Decatnr v. Panlding. 
 
 PAWLET, SOCIETY, &c„ T. See Society, &c. 
 15 
 
 a 12 H. 695, Trebilcock v. Wilson. 
 
 a 2 Wh. 378, Colson v. Lewis. 
 6 2 P. 578, Beatty v. Kurtz. 
 6 6 P. 433, Cincinnati v. White, 
 c 6 H. 332, Plant. Bank v. Sharp, 
 c 10 H. 532, East Hartford v. Hart- 
 ford Bridge Co. 
 c IG H. 376, State Bank v. Knoop. 
 c 1 Bl. 373, Rice v. Railroad Co. 
 6 95 U. S. 313, Ould«. Washington 
 Hospital. 
 Pawlet. 
 
226 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 PAWXING V. UNITED STATES, 4 Cr. 319. 
 
 Demurrer to evidence, a 
 Deed; evidence explaining;. 6 
 OflBcial bonds ; snreties; right to 
 sliow they signed on conditions, c 
 
 a 12 Wli. 383, Ins. Oo. v. Catlett, 
 h 13 H. 330, R. B. Co. v. Howard, 
 c IG Willi. 4, Dair v. U. S. 
 a 22 Wall. 121, Pleasants v. Fant. 
 
 PATINE, BAXDWTN v. See Baldwin v. Payne. 
 PATISE V. HOOK, 7 WaU. 435. 
 
 U. S. courts ; remedies of citizens a 13 Wall, 
 of different States cannot be limited a 20 Wall. 
 \iy State legislation, a a 21 Wall. 
 
 Eqnity; parties, h 6 94 U. S. 
 
 Administrators; suits against, c c 94 U. S. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 
 PAYITE, I/AJSTBEBT v. See Lambert r. Payne. 
 PAYNE, PHrLMPS v. See PliiUips v. Payne. 
 PATSON, COOUDGE v. See Coolldgo v. Payson. 
 PEAKE, CAKBOM, v. See Carroll v. Peake. 
 
 PEAIiE V. PHXPPS, 14 H. 368. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; dissolution of corporation, a 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction between 
 State and Federal courts. 6 
 
 287, B.R.Co.wWhitton 
 4.33, Ins. Co. ». Morse. 
 283, Yonley u.Lavender 
 736, Jerome v. MoCarter 
 749, Tate v. Iforton. 
 21, Hotel Co. w. Wade. 
 
 a 17 H. 159, Bank b. Horn. 
 h 17 H. 474, PuUiam u. Osborne. 
 h 20 H. 596, Taylor b. Carrvl. 
 h 23 H. 107, Green e. Creighton. 
 
 PEAEI,, ELXICOTT v. See EUicott v. Pearl. 
 PEASE V. PECK, 18 H. 599. 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatory force of 
 
 State decisions, a 
 
 a 1 WaU. 392, Meyer c. Musca- 
 tine. 
 a 101 U. S. 128, Roberts ». BoUes. 
 
 PEASI.BB, SAMPSON v. See Sampson v. Peaslee. 
 PEASLEE, STAIKS v. See Stairs v. Peaslee. 
 PECHNEB, ESrS. CO. v. See Ins. Co. v. Pecliner. 
 PECK, FIETCHEB v. See Fletcher «. Peck. 
 
 PECK V. JENNESS, 7 H. 613. 
 
 Obiter dicta, a 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction. 6 
 
 State courts cannot i-estraiti the 
 Federal courts, c 
 
 Baida-uptcy; rights of assign- 
 ees, d 
 
 Federal. courts cannot enjoin 
 State courts, e 
 
 PECK, PEASE V. See Pease v. Peck. 
 PECK V. SANDERSON, 17 H. 178. 
 
 Collision; duties of steamers, a 
 
 PECK V. SANDEKSON, 18 H. 43. 
 
 Supreme Court; power to re- 
 vicnv its decisions, a 
 
 Reliearing; refusal to grant by 
 lower court discretionary, b 
 
 a 16 H. 279, Carroll k. Carroll. 
 b 18 H. 263, Orton e. Smith. 
 6 20 H. 596, Taylor v. Carryl. 
 6 24 H. 457, Freeman v. Howe. 
 b 2 Bl. 588, Eandall U.Howard, 
 c 6 Wall. 195, Biggs v. Jolm. Co. 
 b 13 Wall. 716, Watson ». Jones. 
 d 14 Wall. 248, Gibson v. Warden, 
 e 96 U. S. 341, Dial u. Reynolds. 
 
 I a 21 H. 1, The Louisiana ». Fisher. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 129, Noonan v. Bradley. 
 6 14 Wall. 22, Steines v. Franklin. 
 a 17 Wall. 283, Tyler ». Magwire. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 227 
 
 PEETE V. MOKGAN", 19 TVaU. S81. 
 
 Constitution ; tonnage tax. a a 20 Wall. .581, Cannon v New Or. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 245, S. S. Co. v. Tinker 
 a 9.5 U. S. SG, Pa. Co. u. Keokiilc. 
 a 99 U. S. 284, Tr. Co. u Wheeling 
 a 100 U. S. 67S, Maoh. Co. v. Gage. 
 
 PEGGT, THE, U. S. v. See U. S. ». The Peggy. 
 
 PEGtJES, HUMPHRET v. 
 
 FEIRSOIi, EliMOTT v. 
 
 See Humphrey v. Pega«s. 
 See Elliott v. Peirsol. 
 
 PEEBSOIX T. ELLIOTT, 6 P. 100. 
 
 Equity ; difstnissal of bill without I 
 prejudice, a I 
 
 PEISCH v. WAKE, 4 Cr. 347. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction, a 
 
 PELHLiM V, ROSE, 9 Wall. 103. 
 
 Confiscation ; seizure, a 
 Duty of the marshal to preserve 
 property seized, b 
 
 a 7 Wall. 110, Durant v. Essex. 
 
 I « 15 P. 41, Houseman v. The Korth 
 I Carolina. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 201, Pelliara v. Way. . 
 a 15 Wall. 598, Brown v. Kennedy. 
 & 17 Wall. 95, Averill v. Smith, 
 a 99 U. S. 376, U. S. ». Winchester. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 598, Brown v. Keniiedv, 
 I a 94 U. S. 712, Pike v. Wassell. 
 
 PELTON V. NATIONAl BAIfK, 101 V. S. 143. 
 
 National banks; State taxation J a 101 U. S. 155, CummiugsK. Bank 
 of shares, a 
 
 FELHAItl T. WAT, 
 
 Confiscation . a 
 
 15 WaU. 200. 
 
 PENBUETON CO. V. AMY, 13 WaU. 897. 
 
 County bonds in aid of railroads ; I a 93 U. 
 recitals; estoppel, a a 94 U. 
 
 There must be legislative author- o 94 U. 
 ity to issue. 5 I 6 94 U. 
 
 PENHALLOW V. DOAITE, 3 DaU. 93. 
 
 Admiralty; restitution, a 
 Constitution ; what is a ' State.' 6 
 Supreme Court; review of facts, c 
 
 S. 513, Kandolph Co v Post 
 S. 73, Leav. Co. ». Barnes. 
 S. 206, Com'rs v. January. 
 S. 262, S. Ottawa u. Perkins 
 
 a 4 Cr. 20, Jennings v. Carson. 
 * 7 Wall. 720, Texas v. White, 
 c 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Polsom. 
 
 PENISTON, BAXLROAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Pcniston. 
 PENNXNGTON V. COX, a Cr. 50. 
 
 Statutes ; construction, a 
 
 PEKNINGTON V. GIBSON, 16 H. 65 
 
 Decrees of the same foroe as judg- 
 ments, a 
 Judicial notice, h 
 
 PEmvOCK V. COE, 83 H. 117. 
 
 Mortgage of after-acquired prop- 
 erty; injunctions; U. S, courts; 
 ancillary suit, a 
 Railroads; mortgages. 6 
 Rolling stock; sale of road; what 
 passes, c 
 
 I a 3 H. 563, U. S. i'. Freeman. 
 I a 96 U. S. 117, Arthur v. Lahey. 
 
 a 24 H. 203, Nations v. Johnson. 
 b 9 Wall. 121, Chcoveru. Wilson. 
 
 a 24 H. 460, Freeman v. Howe. 
 b 1 Wall. 267, Dunham uR.R. Co. 
 c 6 Wall. 752, James v. R. R. Co. 
 
228 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 PENTfOCK V. DIALOGUE, 8 V. 14. 
 
 Patent law; public use. a 
 Abandonment. 6 
 Bills of exception, c 
 Agreed statement of facts, d 
 
 PENNOTER V. NEIT, 95 U. S. 714. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; service by publica- 
 tion, a 
 
 a 7 I'. 310, Sliaw v. Cooper., 
 a 1 H. 204, McClnrgt). Kingsland, 
 a H. 477, Hogg v. Emerson. 
 & 21 H. 329, Kendall v. Winsor. 
 c 1 Bl. 218, Johnstone u. Jones. 
 d 1 Wall. 103, Burr ». DCS Moines. 
 6 7 Wall. 608, Agagaraw. Jordon. 
 ill Wall. 199, GuneresuCanjpbell 
 a 98 U. S. 46, Bates v. Coe. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 478, Hai-kness v. Hj'de. 
 a 99 U. S. 370, Brooklyn wins. Co. 
 a 101 U. S. 413, Livingston Co. v. 
 
 Darlington. 
 a 101 U. S. 422, Mohr v. Manierre. 
 
 PENNSITLVANIA, THE. See Union S. S. Co. v. Vn. S. S. Co. 
 PBNNSTIiVANIA, BUTI.ER v. See Bntler v. Pennsylvania. 
 PENNSYIVANIA COIXEGE CASES, IS ■Wall. 313. 
 
 Constitution ; charters ; reserved 
 power to amend or repeal. ' a 
 
 IT. S. courts ; bound by construc- 
 tion of the State courts of their 
 own statutes. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 488, Miller v. State. 
 a 15 Wall. 511, Holyoke Co. v. 
 
 Lyman. 
 6 98 U. S; 366, K. tt. v. Georgia. 
 a 101 U. S. 540, R. E. Co. v. Pliila. 
 
 PENNST1.VANIA, CONNEOTICOX v. See Conneoticut v. Pennsylvania. 
 PENNSYI-VANIA, COOK v. See Cook u. Pennsylvania. 
 PENNSYLVANIA, EKIE K. K. v. See Erie R. E. Co. v. Pennsylvania. 
 PENNSYLVANIA, PRIGG v. See Prigg v. Pennsylvania. 
 PENNSYLVANIA v. "WHEELING BRIDGE CO., IS H. 6S7. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce; bridges; concurrent pow- 
 ers, a 
 Judicial and legislative powers. 6 
 Mandamus to compel perform- 
 ance of public duty ; who can bring_ 
 such a suit. c. 
 
 a 18 H. 429, Penn. v. Bridge Co. 
 a 1 Bl. 634, Conway ». Taylor. 
 a 2B1,495, K. R. Co. «. Ward. 
 a 3 Wall. 727, Gilman (j.Phila. 
 a 10 Wall. 462, Clinton Bridge. 
 6 13 Wall. 146, U. S.B.Klein. 
 a 17 Wall. 569, R. R. Co. u. Puller, 
 c 91 U. S. 355, R. R. Co. v. Hall. 
 a 93 U. S. 102, Sherlock v. Ailing. 
 a 96 U. S. 3S7, Wisconsin v Dnluth 
 
 PENNSYLVANIA v. WHEELING BRIDGE CO., 
 
 Constitution ; legislative and ju- 
 dicial power, a 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce. 6 
 
 . 18 H. 429. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 146, C. S. v. Klein. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 332, Stockdale v Ins. Co. 
 
 6 93 U. S. 12, South Car. v. Ga. 
 
 PENN. B. K., PIQUIGNOT v. See Piquignot v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 
 PENROSE, BISSELL v. See Bissell v. Penrose. 
 PENSACOLA, BROUGHXON v. See Broughton v. Pensaoola. 
 PEOPLE, BRADLEY v. See Bradley o. People. 
 PEOPLE v. COMMISSIONERS, 4 WaU. 855. 
 
 Constitution ; no power in the 
 States to tax national securities, a 
 
 Taxation of shares national 
 banks, b 
 
 Capital stock, c 
 
 a 7 Wall. 699, Austinii Aldermen 
 a 9 Wal 1 . 590, Thompson ». R. R. 
 & 95 U. S. 20, Adams v Nashville 
 c 95 U. S. 687, Farrington v Tenn 
 b 100 U. S. 546, People v. Weaver. 
 
MAinjAL OF SUPHEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 229 
 
 PEOPUE, MAOTJIEBAUM v. See Mandlebanm v. People. 
 
 PEOPUE, NORTHERN EAILROAB v. Sf e Northern Eailroad v. People. 
 
 PEOPLE V. WEAVER, 100 U. S. 539. 
 
 Niitioiial bank shares; taxation, a ] a 101 Q. S. 145, Pulton 2; Nat. Bank 
 
 PEOPLE'S EEKRT CO. v. REEKS, 30 H. 400. 
 
 Adrairalt}' jurisdiction ; maritime 
 contiact.i. a 
 
 PEPPER V, DtnSXAP, 
 
 Supreme Court ; 
 ments. (V 
 
 a 22 H. 131, Eoarli v. Chapman. 
 a 23 H. 494, Moanvood v Enivquist 
 a 7 Wall. 646, The Belfast. 
 a 11 Wall. 28, Ins. Co. v. Dunham 
 
 6 H. 51. 
 
 fiaal judg-j a IS Wall. 58S, Moore v. Bobbins. 
 I a 20 Wall. 654, Parcels ». Johnson. 
 
 PERALTA, U, S, V, See U. a v. Peralta. 
 PEKCHEJLUf, TJ. S. T, See V. S. v. Percheman. 
 FERDICARTES, DEWING v. See Dewing v. Perdicaries. 
 PEREZ, V, S. V. See U. S. 1). Perei. 
 PERIN v. CARET, S4 H. 491. 
 
 Executory trusts; perpetuities, a | aSo U. S. 312, Ould c. University. 
 
 PERKINS V. FOURNIQUET, 6 H. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees. 
 
 ao6. 
 
 a a 8 H. 409, West v. Smith. 
 a 11 H. 28, U. S. V. Girault. 
 a 18 H. 200, Craighead v. Wilson. 
 a 2 Wall. 443, E. R. Co. v. Soutter 
 
 PERKINS T. FOCRNIQUET, 14 H. 388. 
 
 Supreme Court ; damages, a 
 
 PERKINS, POURNIQUET T. See Foumiquet «. PerMns. 
 PERKINS V. HART, 11 Wt. 3S6. 
 
 j a 94 U. S. 102, E. E. Co. v. Foley. 
 
 Accounts; impeaching, a 
 Certificates of division, b 
 
 a 1 Bl. 93, Hager v. Thompson. 
 6 2 Bl. 434, Ward v. Chamberlain 
 a 10 Wall. 132, Wiggins uBurkhani 
 
 PERMOLI V. FIRST aTCNIdPALITY, 3 H. 589. 
 
 Ordinance of 1787 ; religion, a | a 10 H. 92, Strader v. Graliam, 
 
 FERRIN, McMICKEN v. See McMicken v. Perrin. 
 PERRESB V. CHES. & OHIO R. R. CO., 9 H. 178. 
 
 a 21 H. 442, Pearce v. E. E. Co. 
 6 1 Bl. 380, Eice v. E. E. Co. 
 
 Corporations; powers, a 
 Construction in favor of the pub- 
 lic, b 
 
 PERKY, MTTLEFIELD v. See Littlefleld v. Perry. 
 
 PEKRT, O'BRIEN v. See O'Brien v. Perry. 
 
 PERSEVERANCE, BRIG, JENNINGS v. See Jennings v. Brig Perseverance. 
 
 PERVEAR V. COMMONWEALTH, 5 WaU. 479. 
 
 Constitution ; State tax on im- 
 ports, a 
 
 First ten amendments apply to 
 the Federal government. 6 
 
 PETER V. BEVELY, 10 P. 558. 
 
 Wills; payment of debts ; execu- 
 tors ; powers to sell ; devastavit, a 
 When powers survive. 6 
 Equitable conversions, c 
 
 a 8 Wall. 122, Waring «. Mayor. 
 a 15 Wall. 295, State Tax Eailway 
 
 G-ross Epccipts. 
 6 92 U. S. 552, U. S. v. CniiUshank 
 
 a I H. 147, Bank U. S. v. Bi'vi.Oy. 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Beuhani. 
 b Wall. 353, Lorlngs c. Mai-sh. 
 c 19 Wall. 174, Cropley v. Cooper. 
 
230 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 PETERS, r. S. V. See U. S. ■«. Peters. 
 PETERS T. WAKKEN INS. CO., 14 P. 109. 
 
 Insurance ; cause of loss, a | a 14 H. 361, Ins. Co. v. Sherwoocl. 
 PETERS, "WHEATON v. See Wheaton v. Peters. 
 PETERSON, ATCHINSON v. See Atchinsou v. Peterson. 
 PETTY, MERRELI, v. See Merrill v. I'etty. 
 PEUCH V. I>ATIS> 96 V. S. 336. 
 
 Equity; parol ovicfence ; appar-1 a 98U..S. 516, Bricki?. Brielc. 
 
 ent sale shown to be a mortgage, a \ 
 
 PEYROtJX V. HOWARD, 7 P. 339. 
 
 Maiitime contracts ; arlmiralty 
 jurisdiction, a 
 
 Vessels; home and foreign poit; 
 rules applicable to. 6 
 
 Hypothecation by master in for- 
 eign port, c 
 
 Jurisdiction above tide water, d 
 
 Liens given by State laws ; when 
 enforced by U. S. courts, e 
 
 a 10 P. 117, Hobart v. Drogan. 
 
 a 11 P. 17.'>, Orleans v. Plioebits. 
 
 a 3 H. 573, Andrews v. Wall. 
 
 a 5 H. 452, Waring v. Clarkp. 
 
 b 17 H. 597, Hays v. Pac. S. S. Co. 
 
 c 19 H. 25, Tliom;is v. Osbni-ne. 
 
 d 20 H. 297, Jackson v. Magnolia. 
 
 e 21 H. 251, Maguire v. Card. 
 
 1^22 H. 131, Roacli v. Chapman. 
 
 e 1 Bl. 529, The St. Lawrerree. 
 
 c 9 Wall. 136, The Grapeshot. 
 
 e 13 Wall. 243, exparte McXeit. 
 
 e 21 Wall. 579, The Lottawanna. 
 PETTON, RABTJRG v. See Eabnrg v. Peytoa. 
 PEYTON V. STITH, 6 P. 486. 
 
 Equity; lapse of time; laches, a [ a 10 P. 221, Boon v. Chfles. 
 PEYTON, WILXIAMS T. See Williams v. Peyton. 
 PHAIEN, CATTS V. See Catts v. Phalen. 
 PHALEN v. VIRGINIA, 8 H. 163. 
 
 Lotteries, a 
 
 PHELPS T. MAYER, 15 H. 360. 
 
 Bills of exception, a 
 Must be signed by the judge. 5 
 Supreme Court ; objections must 
 be taken in the court below, c 
 
 1 a 101 U. S. 818, Stone v. Miss. 
 
 a 20 H. 252, U. S. v. Breitling. 
 
 6 20 H. 438, Snydam v. Willian)son 
 
 b 2 Bl. 568, Dredge v. Poi-syth. 
 
 c 20 Wall. 418, Mays v. Fritton. 
 
 a93U. S. 555, Stanton B.Embrey. 
 PHELPS, RBICHART T. See Eeictorti). POielps. 
 PHETTIPI^CE, PARKER v. See Parker v. Phettiplaee. 
 PHILADELPHIA, CHRIST CHURCH v. See Christ Church v. Philadelphia. 
 PHILADELPHIA v. COLLECTOR, 6 Wall. 738. 
 
 U. S. courts; revenue cases, a 
 Actions against coUectore to re- 
 cover back taxes. 6 
 
 9 Wall. 565, Hornthall i>. Coll'r 
 9 Wall. 571, Assessors wOsberii 
 10 Wall. 444, Kimball !> Collect 'r 
 10 Wall. 652, Baltimoi-e v. R. B. 
 12 Wall. 8, Collec'ru Hubbard 
 17 Wall. 307, Bames v. R. R. Co 
 22 Wall. 639, Bailey v. R. B. Co 
 98 U. S. 544, R.R. Co. v Com'rs 
 
 6 101 U. S. 179, Wright uBlakeslee 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 231 
 
 PHJXADELPHIA, OILMAN v. See GUman v. Philadelphia. 
 
 PHEL., Sec, CO., PHJX., Wit. & HALT. K. K. v. See Phil., Wil. & Bait. E. 
 E. 11. Phil., &c., Co. 
 
 PHUi. & NEW ORIJEIANS, V. S. v. See U. S. i). Phil. & New Orleans. 
 
 PHIL. & BEAD. B. B. CO. t 
 
 Carriers by steam ; duties, a 
 Corporations ; liability for act of 
 agents. 6 
 Torts, c 
 
 DERBY, 14 H. 486- 
 
 16 H. 472 
 
 Stea'boat New World 
 V. King, 
 6 IS H. 480, Bac6n v. Robertson, 
 c 21 H. 210, E. R. V. Quigk'y. 
 a 17 Wall. 874, R.R.u. Lock wood 
 a 93 U. S. 296, R. R. v. Hoist. 
 c 100 U. S. 203. Sav. Banku. Ward 
 a 101 U. S. 462, City of Panama. 
 a 102 U. S. 455, Penn. Co. v. Roy. 
 
 PHIL. 
 
 : T. B. B. CO. V. STEMPSON, 14 P. 458. 
 
 .Jnrisdiction. a 
 
 Cross-examination. 6 
 
 Patent act ; notice of special mat- 
 ter. I- 
 
 Patent; effect and force of. d 
 
 Supreme Court ; error ; will not 
 interfere with general conduct of 
 trial in court below, e 
 
 a 16 P. 81, Cocke v. Halsey. 
 
 a 2 H. 335, Grignon v. Astor. 
 
 & 1 Bl. 227, Johnston u. Jones. 
 
 6 1 Wall. 705, Houghton «. Jones 
 
 a 8 Wall. 83, U. S. v. Speed. 
 
 c S Wall. 428, Blanchard v. Put- 
 nam. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 300, Miller v. U. S. 
 
 d 11 Wall. 543, Seymour v. O.s- 
 borne. 
 
 d 19 Wall. 395, Mitchell v. Tilgli- 
 man. 
 
 c 91 U. S. 41S, 1st Unitarian Soc. 
 V. Faulkner. 
 
 6 100 U. S. 626, Wills v. Russell. 
 
 PHIL. & WILM. B. B. V. MABTLAND, 10 H. 393. 
 
 Constitution ; exemption from 
 taxation never presumed to be 
 granted, a 
 
 Railroads ; right of several States 
 to unite in chartering or consoli- 
 dating. 6 
 
 How exemption is affected by 
 consolidation, c 
 
 a 6 Wall. 606, Soo. for Sav. v. Coit 
 6 12 Wall. 82, R. R. Co. v. Harris, 
 c 15 Wall. 465, Tomllnsonw Branch 
 6 18 Wall. 228, Del. R.R. Tax Case 
 a 20 Wall. 61, R. R. v. Maguire. 
 a 22 Wall. 575, Tucker j). Ferguson 
 a 92 U. S. 675, R. R. v. Georgia. 
 c 94 U. S. 690, Scot. Co. 4). Thomas 
 c 94 U. S. 725, R. R. v. Virginia. 
 
 PHIL., WIL. & HALT. B. B. v. PHIL., &c., CO., 33 H. 315. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; collision I a 1 Bl. 580, Propeller Commerce, 
 within body of a county, a \ 
 
 PHIL., WIL. & BAXT. B. B. CO. v. QUIGLBY, 31 H. 307. 
 
 Corporations; agents; -when acts 
 of, presumed in regular course of 
 business, a 
 
 Exemplary damages. & 
 
 a 7 Wall. 413, R. R. v. Howard. 
 a 10 AVall. 645, Merchants' Bank 
 
 V. State Bank. 
 6 91 U. S. 493, R. R. v. Armes. 
 a 99 U. S. 682, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 a 100 U. S. 702, Nat.B'kuGraliam 
 
 PHILLIPS, EVANS v. See Evans v. Phillips. 
 
232 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 PHnXIPS V. PAGE, 24 H. 168. 
 
 Patent act; practice; notice of 
 special matter, a 
 
 What changes in machines pat- 
 entable. 6 
 
 Depositions; objections to com- 
 petency, c 
 
 S Wall. 428, Blaiichard v. Put- 
 nam. 
 9 Wall. 740, Wise v. AUis. 
 11 Wall. 548, Scymoni- v. Os- 
 borne. 
 23 Wall. 563, Collar Co. v. Van 
 Duseu. 
 S. 198, Dunbar v. Myci-s. 
 S. 492, Planing Machine 
 Co. V. Kcnth. 
 
 6 94 U. 
 c 101 U. 
 
 I a 101 U. S. 42, The Florida. 
 
 a 8 H. 245, Clark v. Man. Ins. Co. 
 6 17 H. 11, Arthurs v. Hart, 
 c 21 H. 167, Barreda v. Silsby. 
 b 12 Wall. 282, Kearney v. Case. 
 b 91 U. S. 614, Gilman *. Tel. Co. 
 
 PHrLtrPS V. PATNE, 98 V. S. 130 
 
 Political questions, a 
 
 PHtLtrPS V. PRESTON, 5 H. 891. 
 
 Parol evidence, a 
 
 Louisiana ; waiver of jury ; ap- 
 peals; what evidence must be re- 
 turned, b 
 
 Jury ; facts found by cannot be 
 re-examined by U. S. courts, except 
 according to the rules of the com- 
 mon law. c 
 
 PHIPPS, PEALE T. See Peale v. Phipps. 
 PBUPPS V. SEDGWICK, 95 U. S. 3. 
 
 Voluntary conveyances in fraud I a 97 U. S. 309, 
 of creditors, a \ 
 
 PHISTEREB, U., S. T. See U. S. ■«. PMsterer. 
 
 PHCEBUS, THE ORLEANS v. See Orleans, The, v. Phoebus, 
 
 PIATT, OMVER V. See Oliver i>. Piatt. 
 
 PIATT V. OLIVER, 3 H. 401. 
 
 FoUowingtrust funds; election, a 
 Bona-flde purchasers, b 
 
 Trust Co. 
 wick. 
 
 Sedg- 
 
 PIATT V. VATTIER, 9 P. 406. 
 
 Bona-flde purchasers, a 
 Equity; laches. 6 
 
 a 92 U. S. 186, Smith v. Vodges. 
 6 100 U. S. 584, Dickerson v. Col- 
 ' grove. 
 
 PICKETT V. lEGBRWOOD, 7 P. 144. 
 
 a 10 P. 180, Boon v. Chiles, 
 6 1 H. 163, McKnight v. TavJor. 
 6 1 H. 189, Bowman v. Warlien. 
 b 7 H. 255, Wagner v. Baird. 
 6 8 H. 218, Maxwell v. Kennfidv. 
 6 19 H. 124, Long v. O'Falloii. 
 h 99 U. S. 211, GoddenB.Kiminell. 
 
 Supreme Court; return of writ 
 
 of error and citation, a 
 Motion to dismiss under Rule 9. 6 
 Equity; motions to vacate decree.c 
 
 PICO, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Pico. 
 
 PICO V. U. S., 5 Wall. 536. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; sur- 
 veys, a 
 
 a 6 n. 88, Villabolas v. U. S. 
 
 6 3 Wall. 103, Sparrow v. Strong. 
 
 c 22 Wall. 249, Finch v. Hay. 
 
 a, 95 U. S. 35, Van Eeynegan 
 Bolton. 
 
 PIEDMONT INS. CO. v. EWING, 98 U. S. 377. 
 
 Insurance ; when contract is I a 102 U. S. 112, Giddings b Ins. Co. 
 made; payment of premmm. a I '6 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 233 
 
 PIEKCE, BROWN v. See Brown o. Pierce, 
 PIERCE V. CARSKABEN, 16 Wall. 834. 
 
 Constitution; expostfactolaws. a | a 97 U. S. 385, Burgess v. Salmon. 
 
 PIKE T. WASSEM,, 94 V. S. 711. 
 
 Confisctuion. a \ a 102 U. S. 134, French v. Wade. 
 
 PIKE CO., DOUGLASS v. See Douglas^ v. Pike Co. 
 prLLERIN, U. S. V. See U. S. o. Pillerin. 
 pnX,OW V. ROBERTS, 13 H. 472. 
 
 Statute of limitations ; color of 
 title ; po'isessiion. a 
 'l"ax sale.«. 6 
 
 a 18 li. 52, Wright v. Mattison. 
 b 18 II. 139, Parker v. Overman. 
 b "21 H. 333, Thomas v. Lawson. 
 
 PINE GROVE V. TAXCOTT, 19 Wall. 666. 
 
 Bonds in ai<l of railroads ; fondi- I a 94 U. S. 206, Cora's v. January, 
 tions; estoppel; bona-fide holders, a \ 
 
 PINJAND, BURT v. See Burt v. Pinjand. 
 
 PINTARD, THREDGILL v. See Tliredgill v. Pintard. 
 
 PIPER, BROWN V. See Brown v. Piper. 
 
 PIQUA BANK V. KNOOP. See State Banlc v. Knoop. 
 
 PIQUIGNOT, GAMACHE v. See Gamache v. Piquignot. 
 
 PIQUIGNOT T. PENNSTTVANIA B. R. CO., 16 H. 104. 
 
 Pleadhig; abatement, a | a 11 Wall. 668, Cook v. Burnley. 
 
 PIRATES, V. S. V. See U. S. ii. Pirates. 
 PITOT, SERE V. See Sere v. Pilot. 
 PITTSBURG, SEYBERT v. See Seybert v. Pittsburg. 
 PLACE, SPEAR V. See Spear v. Place. 
 
 PLANTERS' BANK, BANK OF U. S. v. See Banlr of U. S. v. Planters' Bank. 
 PLANTERS' BANK, DICKENSON v. See Dickenson i). Planters' Bank. 
 PLANTERS' BANK v. SHARP, 6 H. 301. 
 
 Set-off; notes, a 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; impairment of charter, b 
 
 CI 6 H. 117, Davis v. Tilotson. 
 
 6 12 H. 166, Grand Gulf R. R. &" 
 
 Bank Co. u. Mar.shal]. 
 b 4 Wall. 553, Van Hoffman v. 
 
 Quincy. 
 & 13 Wall. 214, Penn. CoUesje Cas. 
 & 96 U. S. 601, Edwards u.Kearzey 
 
 PLANTERS' BANK v. UNION BANK, 19 W^aU. 495. 
 
 Civil war; povverof military com- I a 101 U. S. 618, Gates v. Goodloe. 
 manders; protection to property, a \ 
 
 PLATT, ORLEANS v. See Orleans 1). Piatt. 
 PLATTSBURGH, THE, 10 WTi. 133. 
 
 Slave-trade, acts ; .slave voya^'es ; I a 12 Wli. 468, U. S. v. Gooding, 
 "fitting out." a I a 2 Wall. 380, The Slavers. 
 
 PLEASANTS V. EANT, 32 W^aU. 180. 
 
 When the court can direct a ver- 
 dict, a 
 
 a 94 U. S. 284, Com'ers v. Clark. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 443, R. R. Co. !). Jones. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 320, Herbert v. Butler. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 27, R. R. Co. v. Fraloff 
 
 a 101 U. S. IS, BovvditchiJ.Boston 
 
 PLUMMEB, WILSON v. See Wilson v. Plummer. 
 
234 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 POE, RHBTT V. See Ehett v. Poe. 
 
 POINDEXTER, GILMER v. See Gilmer v. Pbindexter. 
 
 POINDEXTER, HENDERSON T. See Henderson v. Poindexter. 
 
 POINTS, CKA"WTOKI) v. See Crawford v Points. 
 
 POLICE JURY V. BRITTON, IS 'Wall. 666. 
 
 Louisiana ; levees, a 
 Antlioi'ily of municipality to is- 
 sue bonds. 6 
 
 a 93 U. S. 260, Barkley ». Com'ers 
 b 96 U. S. 350, Hitchcock v. Gal- 
 veston. 
 6 98 U. S. 315, L. Kock v. Nat. B"k 
 
 POLICE JURY, DAVIS v. See Bavis v. Police Jury. 
 POLK v. TVENDALL, 9 Cr. 87. 
 
 Land titles; ejectment; wlien 
 prioi- entry can be attached to junioi' 
 gnint in order to overreacli senior 
 grant, a 
 
 fnvalidating patent by evidence 
 of facts prior to issue. 6 
 
 Northwest territory; after ces- 
 sion no title could be acquired under 
 Virginia. ■ c 
 
 IJ. S. courts; decisions of State 
 courts on State ."tatutes, binding, d 
 
 Grantee can convey no more than 
 he possesses, e 
 
 Patent for land previously grant- 
 ed, void, y 
 
 Deeds; presumptions as to va- 
 lidity, g 
 
 POLK V. TFENDELL, 6 Wh. 293. 
 
 Land titles; patents; presump- 
 tions as to validitj'. a i 
 
 POLLARD V. BAILET, 80 Wall. 630. 
 
 Corporations ; liability of stock- a 
 
 holders in equity, a a 
 
 Liabilities created by statute; a 
 
 how enforced. 6 6 
 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 a 
 
 a 
 b 
 c 
 b 
 a 
 
 a 1 Wh. 482, Koss v. Beed. 
 b 5 Wh. 301, Polk v. Wendell, 
 c 7Wh. 1, Miller u. Kerr. 
 6 11 Wh. 380, Pattersons. Winn. 
 d 12 Wh. 161, Jackson v. Chew. 
 b 2 P. 225, Patterson v. Jenks. 
 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 
 6 P. 730, U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 
 7 P. 234, Sampeyreac v. U. S. 
 
 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 
 13 P. 446, Bagnellj). Broderick. 
 15 P. 104, Brush v. Wear. 
 
 4 H. 51, Beals v. Hale. 
 
 4 H. 379, Foxcroft v. Mallett. 
 d 14 H. 496, Webster v. Cooper. 
 b 18 H. 87, Minter v. Cromelin. 
 d 20 H. 87, Withers v. Buckley. 
 e 1 Bl. 375, Rice v. R. R. Co. 
 / 21 Wall. 675, Morton v. Nebr'ka 
 g 92 U. S. 425, Clements oMache- 
 
 bouef. 
 d 100 U. S. 52, Fairfield w Gallatin 
 
 I a 18 Wall. 118, Best v. Polk. 
 
 POLLARD V. DWIGHT, 4 Cr. 481. 
 
 Jurisdiction; waiver, a 
 Reversals by Supreme Court with 
 ordei- to remand, b 
 Covenants of seizin, c 
 
 POLLARD v. PILES, 8 H. 601. 
 
 Missouri land titles ; incomplete I a 
 titles, a j 
 
 92 U. S. 161, Terry v. Tubman. 
 
 92 U. S. 512, Carroll v. Green. 
 
 93 U. 8. 233, Horner u.Henuing 
 
 96 U. S. 570, M.S.v. Kaufman. 
 
 97 U. S. 177, Godfrey v. Terry. 
 99 U. S. 29, Mills v. Scott. 
 
 101 U. S. 213, Hatch v. Dana. 
 101 U. S. 218, Terry v. Little. 
 
 12 P. 327, Toland v. Sprague. 
 
 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 
 8 H. 464, Leroy v. Beard. 
 11 Wall. 215, Ins. Co. v. Francis. 
 18 Wall. 298, Atkins v. Disinte- 
 grating Co. 
 
 3 H. 51, Barry v. Gamble 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 235 
 
 POIXAKD V. HAGAN, 3 H. SIS. 
 
 Title of States to land below high- 
 water martc. a 
 Ordinance of 1787. 6 
 
 POIXAED V. KIBBE, 14 P. 353. 
 
 Land titles ; water lots in Mobile ; 
 act of 1824. a 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error 
 to State court; claim of title under 
 the V. S. 6 
 
 Spanish titles; perfect and im- 
 perfect, c 
 
 Eight of tlie State to navigable 
 waters and the soil under them, d 
 
 a 9 H. 477, Goodtitle v. Kibbe. 
 6 10 H. 92, Strader v. Graham. 
 a 13 H. 26, Doe v. Beebe. 
 a 18 H. 72, Smith v. Maryland. 
 a 20 H. 87, Withers v. Buekley. 
 a 6 Wall. 436, Mumford v Wardell 
 a IS Wall. 66. Weber v. Com'rs. 
 a 23 Wall. 68, St. Clair v Lov'gton 
 a 94 IT. S. 337, Bui'ney v. Keoliulv. 
 a 94 U. S. 394, McCready v. Virg'a 
 
 a 16 P. 242, Mobile v. Eslava. 
 b 2 H. 372, Chouteau v. Eclchart. 
 a 2 H. 601, Pollard v. Files. 
 c 3 H. 51, Barry v. Gamble. 
 6 4 H. 177, Jourdon v. Barrett. 
 6 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 c 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 c 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile. 
 6 22 H. 202, Lvtle v. Arkansas. 
 d 23 Wall. 68, St Clair v Lovingston 
 
 POIXAKD, B. K. CO. v. See R. E. Co. v. PoUard. 
 POLIETS, OCEAJS' ENS. CO. v. See Ocean Ins. Co. v. PoUeys. 
 POMEKOT V. BAJfK OF rNDIANA, 1 Wall. 608. 
 
 Bills of exception; what is the 
 "Record" in the Supreme Court, a 
 Facts ; re-examination. 6 
 
 a 5 Wall. 675, Thompson v. Riggs 
 a 6 Wall. 559, Ins. Co. v. Halloclc 
 a 91 U. S. 133, R. E. v. Trustees. 
 a 93 U. S. 555, Stanton v. Embrey. 
 a 95 U. S. 172. Ins. Co. v. Lanier. 
 b 98 U. S. 445, The Abbotsford. 
 
 POMEKOT, SliOCUM v. See Slocnm v. Pomeroy. 
 
 POND, A3SDBEWS v. See Andrews v. Pond. 
 
 POOI.E V. FI.EEGEK, 11 P. 210. 
 
 Public land; one nation cannot 
 grant territory of another, a 
 
 Boundary between Nortli Caro- 
 lina and Virginia. & 
 
 Registration of deed; may have 
 relation back, c 
 
 Bills of exceptions, d 
 
 POOR V. CONSEDINE, 6 Wall. 476. 
 
 Contingent remainders, a \ al9 Wall. 176, Cropley v. Cooper. 
 
 POPE, CHOTAKD v. See Chotard v. Pope. 
 POKTEK, BENTfEK v. See Benner v. Porter. 
 POBTEK v. EOIiBY, 31 H. 393. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error; I a 11 Wall. 86, The Protector, 
 amendment, a 
 
 a 12 P. 511, Garcia v. Lee. 
 
 6 2 H. 106. Porterfield v. Clark. 
 
 d 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benliam. 
 
 a 10 11. 641, Robinson v. Minor. 
 
 c 16 H. 19. Turner v. Yates. 
 
 6 9 Wall. 603, Merryman v Bourne 
 
 POKTEK V. EOL.BT, 84 H. 430. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error 
 to State courts ; how Federal ques- 
 tion must be shown, a 
 
 a 10 Wall. 510, Messenger «. Mason 
 
236 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 POBTEBriEI,D V. CLARK, 8 H. 185. 
 
 U. S. courts ; statutes of a State ; 
 rule of decision, a 
 Indian treaty. 6 
 
 a 6 Wall. 537, Haim;er v. Abbott 
 b 17 Wall. 246, Holden v. Joy. 
 a 9S U. S. 235, Andrae v. Redfielil. 
 
 POKTI.AND K. B. CO., SULLIVAN v. See Sullivan 1). Portland R. E. Co. 
 POET WABDENS, STEAMSHIP CO. v. See Steamship Co. v. Port Wardens. 
 POST V. JONES, 19 H. 157. 
 
 Shipping; wlien master may sell I a 6 Wall. 26, The Amelie. 
 his ship, a | 
 
 POST, MICHAELS V. See Miehaels v. Post. 
 
 POST, BANDOLPH CO. V. See Eandolpli Co. v. Post. 
 
 POSTMASTEB-GENEEAL, DOX v. See Box v. Postmaster-General. 
 
 POSTMASTEE-GENEEAL v. EAELY, 12 WJx. 136. 
 
 Suit by Postmaster-General ; Dis- 
 trict Court; jiiiUdiction. a 
 
 v. S.; power to contract ; volun- 
 tary bond.'j of public officei-s. 6 
 
 Statutes; declaratory acts, c 
 
 a 1 P. 323, Dox v. Postmaster- 
 General. 
 6 10 P. 357, U. S. V. Bradley, 
 c 97 U. S. 549, U. S. v. Claflin. 
 
 POSTMASTEB-GENEEAL v. TEIGG, 11 P. 173. 
 
 Mandamus; rnletosliowcause. a | a 14 H. 11, ex parte Taylor. 
 
 POTOMAC, THE, 8 "WaU. 590. 
 
 Collision ; steamers and sailing I a 91 U. S. 204, The Free State. 
 
 POTOMAC CO., MCMMA v. See Kumma v. Potomac Co. 
 POTTEE, BBADSTEEET v. See Bradstreet v. Potter. 
 POTTBB, EYBE v. See Eyre -o. Potter. 
 POTTEE V. GAEDNEE, 12 Wh. 499. 
 
 Devise for payment of debt; 
 purchaser from devisee; when 
 charged for the purcliase-money. a 
 
 Bona-fide purchaser ; plea of. 6 
 
 POULTNEY V. LA FAYETTE, 12 P. 474. 
 
 e^nr"tl"'"'"'''' ^^'^""^""^ °^ ^- ^^ ^3 P. 3,59, Story «. Livingston, 
 courts, a I „ i:-; t> iq n„i^ t._i/^ 
 
 POUND V. TUBK, 95 U. S. 459. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce ; wliat legislation States mav 
 pass; bridges, a 
 
 POWELL V. GREEN, 3 P. 240. 
 
 Tennessee; limitations, a I a 6 P. 291, Green k. Ifeal. 
 
 POWELL, M'LEMOBE v. See M'Lemore i,. Powell 
 POWELL, OBVIS V. See Orris y,. Powell. 
 POWELL, THATCHEE v. See Thatcher ■<, Powell 
 POWELL, U. S. V. See U. S. i). Powell. 
 POWEE, U. S. v. See U. S. «. Power. 
 POWHATAN STEAMBOAT CO. v. APPOMATTOX K. B. CO.. 24 H. 266. 
 
 Contracts on Sunday, a I a 14 Wall. 503, U. S. «. Powell 
 
 PEATT, CAMPBELL t. See Campbell ^. Pratt 
 PBATT, CABEINGTON v. See Carrington v. Pratt 
 
 a o P. 718,- Potter v. Gardner. 
 & 10 P. 212, Boon «. Chiles. 
 
 a 15 P. 13, Gaines v. Relf. 
 a 95 U. S. 488, Hall v. De Cuir. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 237 
 
 PKATT V. CAKROLL, 8 Cr. 471. 
 
 Equity ; rescission ; when time is 
 essence of coritraot. a 
 
 PBATT V. FITZHUGH, 1 Bl. SI'S. 
 
 Supreme Court; amount in con- 
 ti-oversy; means pecuniary value, a 
 
 PKATT V. LA'W, 9 Cr. 480. 
 
 Wasliington City ; sales of lots ; 
 breach of contract ; repayment of 
 purchase-money, o 
 
 Enforcing mandate. 6 
 
 Time ; essence of contract, c 
 
 Equity; damages, d 
 PRATT, BAILWAT CO. v. See Kailway Co. v. Pratt. 
 PBATT V. READ, 19 H. 369. 
 
 Admiralty ; liens of material- 1 a 9 Wall. 137, The Grapeshot. 
 men. a I a 10 Wall. 209, The Kalorama. 
 
 PRATT, WASHDfGTON T. See Washington v. Pratt. 
 PRENTICE V. ZAUE, 8 H. 484. 
 
 Special verdict ; mistrial ; venire 
 de novo, a 
 
 a 14 P. 173, Taylor v. Longvvorth. 
 ct 8 H. 149. Veazie v, Williams. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 301, Potts v. Chumasero 
 
 a 5 Wh. 429, Campbell v. Pratt. 
 6 2 P. 354, Campbell v. Pratt, 
 c 14 P. 173, Taylor v. Longvvorth. 
 c? 8 H. 160, Veazie v. Williams. 
 
 a IS H. 61, Graham v. Bayne. 
 
 a 18 H. 13,5, Guild v. Frontain. 
 
 a 20 H. 441, Suydam v. Williamson 
 
 a 23 Wall. 163, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 PRESCOTT, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Preseott. 
 PRESTMAN', DBUMMOND v. See Dmmmond v. Prestman: 
 PRESTON v. BOWMAN, 6 "Wh. 588. 
 
 Boundaries ; monuments, a 
 
 a 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 83G, Higueras v. U. S. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 62, St.Clairw. Lov'ston 
 
 115. 
 
 a 1 AVh. 156, Danforth v. Tliomas 
 a 9 Wh. 673, Danforth v. Wear. 
 6 91 U.S. 79,U.S.w.U.Pac.R.K. 
 
 PRESTON V. BBO"WT>ER, 1 "VTh, 
 
 Indians; entries in lands, a 
 
 Statutes; construction; history 
 of tiie time when passed. 6 
 PRESTON, COOKENDORFEB v. See Cookendorier v. Preston. 
 PRESTON, PBUXtrPS v. See Phillips v. Preston. 
 PKBVOST V. GRATZ, 6 "WTl. 481. 
 
 Equity ; laches ; lapse of time, a 
 When agent cannot purchase 
 property of principal, b 
 
 9 Wh. 405, Piatt v. Vattier. 
 
 1 H. 189, Bowman v. Wathen. 
 
 4 H. 552, Michoud v. Girod. 
 
 5 H. 276, Taylor v. Beiiham. 
 
 2 Wall. 92, Badger v. Badger. 
 a 18 Wall. 506, Clarlrej;. Boorman. 
 
 PRICE, liESSIEUR v. See Lessieur v. Price. 
 PRICE, tr. S. V. See TJ. S. v. Price. 
 PBIGG V. PENNSYLVANIA, 16 P. 611. 
 
 Constitution ; fugitive slave act. a 
 
 Police power. 6 
 
 Contemporaneous construction, c 
 
 Powers of the States to ari'est 
 slaves ; conflict with power of Con- 
 gress, d 
 
 Right or immunity under the 
 Constitution may be protected by 
 Congress, e 
 
 a 5 H. 223. Jones v. Van Zant. 
 6 7 H. 410, Passenger Gas. (Opin. 
 
 of Wayne, J.) 
 c 12 H. 311, Cooleyu Bd. Wardens. 
 d:4H. 17, Moore «). Ilhnois. 
 c IS I-I. 274, Murray u Hoboken Co. 
 a 13 Wall. 662, Osbornu Nicholson 
 elOOU. S. 310, Strauder v. West 
 
 Virginia. 
 
2S8 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 PKrNCE V. BABTtETT, 8 Cr. 431. 
 
 IT. S.; prioi-irj'. a 
 
 PRIZE CASES, » Bl. 665. 
 
 TliR civil war ; effect of tlie block- 
 ade on neutral commerce, a 
 
 Status of citizens and subjects of 
 belligerents. 6 
 51nemy's property, c 
 Character of the war. d 
 Commencement of the war. e 
 
 a IV. 434, Conard v. Ins. Co. 
 a 12 P. 131, Beaston » Farm. Bank. 
 
 a 2 AVall. 148, The Circassian. 
 
 b 2 Wall. 274, The Venice. 
 
 c 2 Wall. 419, Mrs. Alexander's 
 
 Cotton, 
 e 5 Wall. 60, The Petei'hofif. 
 d 7 Wall. 554, Coppell v. Hall. 
 c 11 Wall. 305, Miller v. U. S. 
 d 20 Wall. 395, N. Orl. v. S. S. Co. 
 c 21 Wall. 351, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 a 22 Wall. 423, U. S. ■». Farragut. 
 « 91 IT. S. 9, Matthews!). MoStea 
 d 96 U. S. 184, Williams ». Bruffy. 
 6 97 U. S. 604, Ford v. Surget. 
 
 PBOPKIETOBS, REED V. See Reed v. ProprietorB. 
 PROTECTOR, THE, 9 WaU. 689. 
 
 Civil war; time when it closed, a o 11 Wall. 254, Levy v. Stewart. 
 Suspension of limitations. 6 6 11 Wall. 513, U . S. m. Wiley. 
 
 h 14 Wall. 235, Caperton».Bowyer 
 
 PROTECTOR, THE, 11 Wall. 86. 
 
 Supreme Ct.;, writs of error and i a 13 Wall. 188, Hampton v Rouse, 
 appeals; joinder of proper parties, a \ a 100 U. S. 146, Moore v. Simonds. 
 
 PROTECTOR, THE, 13 TTaU. 700. 
 
 The civil war ; beginning and 
 conclusion of ; suspension of lim- 
 itations, a 
 
 a 15 Wall. 183, Brown v. Hiatts. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 560, Adger ». Alston. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 105, Masterdon v. Hern- 
 don. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 155, Batesville Inst. v. 
 Kaufman. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 525, Burke v. Miltenber- 
 ger. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 587, Ross v. Jones. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 714, Raymond K Thomas 
 
 a 92 U. S. 115, Hai-rison v. Myer. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 193, Lamar «. Brown. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 510, Carroll b. Green. 
 
 o 03 U. S. 99, Bird «. La. St. Bank 
 
 a 96 U. S. 193, Williams v. Bruffy. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 438, McElrath v. U. S. 
 PROUT, LENOX v. See Lenox v. Front. 
 PBOUT V. ROBT, 15 WaU. 478. 
 
 Sup. Court; error; objection must | a 20 Wall. 418, Mays v. Fritton. 
 first be taken in court below, a \ 
 
 PROUTY V. RUGOIiES, 16 P. 337. 
 
 Patents; infringement; combina- a 10 H. 341, Stimpson v. R. R. Co. 
 t'ons. a a \ Wall. 79, Eames v. Godfrey. 
 
 Equivalents. 6 6 11 Wall. 556. Seymour v. Osborn. 
 
 6 15 Wall. 194, Gould v. Rees. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 28, Gill v. Wells. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 367, Reedy v. Scott. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 202, Dunbar b. Myers. 
 
 a 04 U. S. 297, Fullet v. Yentzer. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 239 
 
 PKOVrDENCE V. ClAPP, 17 H. 161. 
 
 Municipal corporations; liability i a 1 Bl. 51. Weightinan v. Wasliing- 
 
 I ton. 
 
 for injuries, a 
 
 PBOVTDENCE BANK v. BILLINGS, 
 
 Public grants; nothing passes by 
 implication, a 
 
 Corporations; charters. 6 
 
 Tax on propert}' ; no implied ex- 
 emption, c 
 
 Power of the Legislature to bind 
 the State by contract, d 
 
 Corporations ; rights in other 
 State*^ € 
 
 Tax by State and U. S. / 
 
 -t P. 559. 
 
 all P. 536, Charles R. Bridge v. 
 Warron Biidgu. 
 
 6 2 H. 550, R. R. Co. v. Lctsoii. 
 
 c G H. 331, Plaiirr's Bank v. Sharp 
 
 c 8 H. 79, Natlian w. LouKiaiia. 
 
 c 16 H. 376, State Bauk v. Kiioop. 
 
 dW H. 427, Ins. Co. v. Debolt. 
 
 d 1 Bl. 442. .Icflfcr. Bank v. Ski-llv. 
 
 c 6 Wall. 606. Soc. for Sav. v. Co'it 
 
 e U Wall. 429, St. Louis v. Ferry. 
 
 c 16 Wall. 249, Humphrevi; Pcgues 
 
 c 18 Wall. 22(1, Del. R. R. Tax Cas 
 
 c 20 W.all. 61, R. R. v. MaijiMi-c. 
 
 c 22 Wall. 575, Tucki'r v. Fcri>'u?;on 
 I e 93 U. S. 222, Morgan v Louisiana 
 I « 93 U. S. 59S, R. R. Co. v. Supc^rv 
 I c 95 U. S. 688, Farriiigton v. Tcnn 
 1 c 97 U. S. 666, Fertil. Co. v. Park. 
 i/99U. S. 281,Trau.CouWlieeUng 
 
 clOOU. S.497. Kii-tland v. Hotcli- 
 klss. 
 
 PBOVIDENCE INS. 
 PKOVIDENCE INS, 
 PROVIDENT INST. 
 
 CO., CAKPENTEB v. See Carpenter v. Prov. Ins. Co. 
 CO., BCEAD V. See Head v. Providence Ins. Co. 
 V. MASSACHUSETTS! 6 WaU. 630. 
 
 U. S. courts : obligatory toi-ce of I a 7 Wall. 540, Randell v. Brlgliani 
 State decisions, a ' \ a 9 Wall. 37, Gut v. State. 
 
 Constitution; validity of State i b 15 Wall. 272. St. Fr'ght Tax Cas 
 tax not determined by tlie form, but ! c 23 Wall. 348, Scholey v. Rew. 
 by tlie subject on which laid. 6 j 6 97 U. S. 572, Cook b. Peun. 
 
 Taxation of corporations by U.S. c I 
 
 PBTOK, NEWSOM v. See Newsom i>. Pryor, 
 PUBLIC SCHOOLS V. WALKEE, 9 Wall. 603. 
 
 Error; refusing or granting re- 
 Iiearing, not reviewable, a 
 Supreme Coui-t ; rehearings. 6 
 
 a 14 Wall. 22, Steinesu. Franklin 
 6 102 U. S. 107, Brooks v. R. R. Co 
 
 PUGH v. McCOBMICE, 14 WaU. 
 
 N'egotiable paper ; stamp act. 
 
 366. 
 
 o I a 14 Wall. 669, Delmas v. Ins. Co. 
 a 21 Wall. 324, Chambers v. Clews 
 
 a 20 H. 596, Taylor v. Carryl. 
 
 ffl 99 U. S. 631, Nat. Bank v. Case. 
 
 PULLIAM V. OSBORN, 17 H. 473. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction between 
 State and Federal courts, a 
 
 PULLMAN V. UPTON, 96 U. S. 338. 
 
 Corporations ; liability of stock- 
 holders, a I 
 
 PUMPELLY V. GKEEN BAY CO., 13 Wall. 166. 
 
 Con.stitution ; eminent domain, a | a 99 U. S. 642, Trans. Co. v Chicago 
 PUECELL V. MINEE, 4 Wall. 613. 
 
 Contracts ; statute of frauds, a | a 95 U. S. 456, Williams v. Morris. 
 PUTNAM, BLANCHAED v. See Blanoliard v. Putnam. 
 
240 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 PUTNAM V. DAT, 2? Wall. 60. 
 
 Bills of review, a a 95 TJ. S. 99, Buffington uHai'vei' 
 
 a 95 U. S. 397, Thompson v. Miix- 
 weil. 
 PYE, JENKINS V. See Jenkins v. Pye. 
 
 QUICK, SPRINGFIELD t. See Springfield v. Quick. 
 QUICKSTEP, THE, 9 "Wall. 6G5 
 
 Supreme Court ; only party ap- 
 pealing can assign ei'ror. a 
 
 Admiralty ; defects in libel, b 
 
 Collision ; when Supreme Court 
 will I'everse decree, c 
 
 Collision with tug. d 
 
 a 12 Wall. 41, The Maria Martin. 
 
 6 12 Wall. 17.3, The Syracuse. 
 
 c 13 Wall. 479, The Ariadne. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 201, The Meriimac. 
 
 d 94 U. S. 497, The Margaret. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 604, The Stephen Mor- 
 gan. 
 QUIGIEY, PHU.. & BAXT. R. R. v. See Phil., "Wil. & Bait. K.E. v. Qnigley. 
 QUINCY, VAN HOFFMAN v. See Van Hoflfman v. (Juinoy. 
 QCINCY, U. S. V. See U. S. ... Quincy. 
 RABAUD, D'WOI.F v. See D'Wolf u. Eaband. 
 RABORG V. PEYTON, 8 Wli. 385. 
 
 Negotiable paper; action of debt I o 6 P. 22, Kirkman v. Hamilton 
 by indorsee agamst acceptor, a \ 
 
 RACHEL, THE, v. U. S., 6 Cr. 389. 
 
 Penalties; remission by repeal I a 3 H. 584, Maryland b. Bait. E. R 
 "* ^''^- « ' I a 9 VVall. 575, Assessor v. Osboni. 
 
 RAE V. CUTLER, 7 H. 789. 
 
 General average; jettison, a I a 19 H. 165. Dupont, v. Vance. 
 
 I a 1 Bl. 113, Bags of Linseed. 
 RAE, THE NEW YORK v. See New York, The, «. Rae. 
 RAE, STAINBACK t. See Stainback v. Eae. 
 RAGAN, M'lVER V. See M'lver v. Eagan. 
 RAILROAD, EX PARTE, 95 U. S. 881. 
 
 Cross-bills, a I o 101 U. S. 187, Ayres «. Chicago. 
 
 RAILROAD, BARNES v. See Barnes v. Eailroad. 
 RAILROAD V. BARRON, 5 WaU. 90. 
 
 Personal actions; survival of. a I a 16 Wall. 534, Steam Co » Chase 
 Damages for personal injuries. 6 U 101 U. S. 464, City^f Panama 
 
 RAILROAD, BELL v. See Bell ,;. Eailroad. 
 
 RAILROAD, BLOSSOM T. See Blossom ■^. Eailroad. 
 
 RAILROAD V. BRADLEYS, 7 WaU. 575 
 
 PaS;'^ horj.ay:^fa'Jmit- "'' ^^"^ '''^ S'-gl'ter - House 
 ^"- " & 94 U.S. 21, ea:^arte Cutting. 
 
 RAILROAD V. COLLECTOR, 100 C. S. 695 
 
 ness Of' ™i\r"ad!""a° ' '''^ °" ^"^'- | « ^'^ U. S. 550, R. R. Co. .. U. S. 
 
 RAILROAD, DUNHAM v. See Dunham .. Eailroad. 
 RAILROAD V. FORT, 17 WaU. 6S7 
 
 vantTT"""' ' '"^"""' *° ^"- I « 100 U. S. 217, Hough .. K. R. Co. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME CODRT DECISIONS. 
 
 241 
 
 RArLBOAD V. FREMONT, 9 Wall. 94. 
 
 Grants by Congress to States in | a 9 Wall. 97, K. E. Co. v. Smith, 
 aid of railroads, a I 
 
 RAILROAD T. GAINES, 97 U. S. 697. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; exemptino; from taxation, a 
 
 BAILBOAD V. GliAJDMAN, 15 Wall, 
 
 Instructions; directing verdict, a 
 Bills of exception. 6 
 Contributory negligence, c 
 Hypotiietical charge, d 
 
 BAIXROAI) V. GRAJfT, 98 U. S. 398, 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error 
 from Supreme Court D. C; amount 
 in controversy, a 
 
 Statutes; effect of repeal on ex- 
 isting rights, b 
 
 RAILROAD V. HAJSNESfG, 16 WaU. 649. 
 
 Negligence; lialiility of owner of | a 102 U. 
 land for injuries, a I 
 
 BArLROAD V. HARRIS, 7 WaU. 574. 
 
 Supreme Court ; wlien copy of 
 \Vrit of error must be lodged ; su- 
 persedeas, a 
 
 RAILROAD V. HARRIS, 13 W^aU. 65 
 
 Corporations; citizenship; rights 
 in other States, a 
 
 Corporations ; powers. 6 
 
 U. S. courts ; suits against for- 
 eign corporations; process, c 
 
 RAILROAD, HARW^OOD v. See Harwooa v. Eailroad. 
 RAILROAD V. HOWARD, 7 Wall. 407. 
 
 a 98 n. S. 563, K. R. Co. v. Loftin. 
 
 , 409. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 162, Ins. Co. ». Baring 
 6 21 Wall. .324, Chambers v Clevvs 
 c 93 U. S. 298, E. R. Co. v. Horst 
 d 94 U. S. 611, Ins. Co. v. Baker, 
 c 100 U. S. 226, Hough v. E. E. Co 
 
 a 101 U. S. 113, E. E. Co. v. Trook 
 b 101 U. S. 438, So. Car. o Gilliard. 
 
 S. 580, Bennett v. E. E. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 40.5, O'Dowd v. Eussell. 
 a 93 U.S. 88, Kitchen uEandolph 
 a 93 U. S. 417, Sage v. E. E. Co. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 284, E. E. Co. v Whitton 
 b 95 U. S. 323, Shields v. Ohio, 
 c 96 U. S. 375, ex parte SchoUen- 
 
 berger. 
 c 96 U. S. 457, E. E. Co. v. Vance. 
 
 Gnaranty. a 
 
 Corporations; stockholders; in 
 terest in tapital stock. 6 
 Estoppel, c 
 
 RAILROAD V. HUSEN, 93 V. S. 859. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- I 
 tracts ; police power, a I 
 
 RAHROAD V. JACKSON, 7 WaU. 866, 
 
 a 20 Wall. 311, Memphis c Brown. 
 b 92 U. S. 367, Scammon v. Kim- 
 
 ball, 
 c 101 U. S. 183, Bank v Nat. Bank 
 
 a 97 U. S. 34, Beer Co. v. Mass. 
 a 97 U. S. 503, Patterson v. Ken'y. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 ti-acts; taxation of property not 
 within jurisdiction, a 
 
 Income tax. b 
 
 all Wall. 432, St. Louis v. Ferry. 
 a 15 Wall. 318, Foreign Held Bonds 
 6 17 Wall. 304, Barnes v. E. E. 
 6 17 Wall. 325, U. S. v. E. E. Co. 
 
 I a 101 U. S. 845, Howard v. E. E. 
 
 RAILROAD V. JAMES, 6 Wall. 7S0. 
 
 Judgment liens, a 
 
 RAUROAD V. JONES, 95 U. S. 439. 
 
 Verdicts ; court can direct, a | a 97 U. S. 278, Macon Co. v. Shores 
 
 RAILROAD V. MNDSAT, 4 WaU. 650. 
 
 U. S. courts ; amendments, a | a 7 Wall. 503, Ewlng v. Howard. 
 16 
 
242 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 KAJXKOAD V. lOCKWOOD, 17 Wall. 357. 
 
 Common carriers ; no ri<fht to lim- 
 it liability for negligence, a 
 
 a 21 Wall. 267, Exp. Co v CaWwell 
 a 22 Wall. 1!{4. K. R. Co. v. Pratt. 
 a 93 U. S. 181, Bank v. Expr. Co. 
 a 9.S U. S. 296, E. K. Co. v. Horst. 
 a 95 U. S. 658, R. R. Co. v Stevens 
 
 RAIIiBOAO V. McCIiUBE, 10 Wall. 513. 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error to I a 12 Wall. 383, Knox » Exfh. Bank 
 State courts ;• Federal question, a a 13 Wall. 263, Klinger v. Missouri. 
 
 I a 99 U. S. 320, University v Peopio 
 
 BAIXROAB V. MAINB, 96 U. S. 499. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 354, Hoore v. R. R. Co. 
 a 99 U. S. 720. Sinking FnndCasps 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tract ; charters ; power of the Leg- 
 islature over ; exemptions from tax- 
 ation, a 
 
 RAILROAD v. MANtTF. CO., 16 Wall. 384. 
 
 Common carriers; contract to I a 22 Wall. 129, !B. E. Co. ». Pratt, 
 carry beyond terminus of road. a\ 
 
 RAILROAD, MARYIiAND v. See Maryland v. E. B. Co. 
 RAILROAD, MORGAN v. See Morgan v. Railroad. 
 RAILROAD V. OTOE, 16 Wall. 675. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 698, Olcott v. Superv's. 
 a 19 Wall. 91, Queensbury v. Cul- 
 ver. 
 6 19 Wall. 672, Chambers v. Clews. 
 c 21 Wall. 321, Chambers v. Clews. 
 
 Municipal corporations; power 
 to aid railroads, a 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatory force of 
 State decisions. 6 
 
 Municipal bonds; conditions; re- 
 citals; bona^fide purchasers, c 
 
 RAILROAD V. PBNISTON, 18 WaU. 5. 
 
 Pacific Railroad ; interest of the I a 98 U. S. 619, U. S. v. R. R. Co. 
 U. S. in. a \ 
 
 RAILROAD V. POIIiARD, 88 WaU. 350. 
 
 Common carriers; railroads; lia- I a 102 U. S. 456, Penn. Co. «. Roy. 
 bility for carriage of passengers, a \ 
 
 RAILROAD T. PRATT, 88 Wall. 183. 
 
 Railroads; contract for shipment I a 96 U. S. 266, E. R. v. McCarthy, 
 beyond own line, a 1 
 
 RAILROAD T. REEVES, 10 Wall. 176. 
 
 Carriers; negligence, a | a 12 Wall. 259, HoUiday »Keiinard 
 
 RAILROAD, RIBON t. See Elbon v. Kailroad. 
 RAILROAD, RICE v. See Eice «. Railroad. 
 RAILROAD V. BOCK, 4 Wall. 180. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State courts ; Federal question, a 
 
 a 11 Wall. 38, Parmalee u. Law- 
 rence. 
 a 12 Wall. 383, Knox v. Ex. Bank. 
 a 13 Wall. 263, KlingerK. Missouri. 
 a 21 Wall. 550, Edwards v'. Elliott. 
 a 92 U. S. 329, Brown v. Atwell, 
 a 99 U. S. 320, University u People 
 
 BAILBOAD V. BOSE, 95 U. S. 98. 
 
 Eevenue; tax on interest paid by | a 101 U. S. 649, R. E. Co. v. U. S. 
 corporations, a I 
 
 BAILBOAD, SAGE v. See Sage v. Railroad. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 243 
 
 KArLBOAD V. SCHUKMEIK, 7 Wall. 287. 
 
 lyiiiul titlos; confinnation floes 
 not enlarge the boundaries, a 
 
 When bouiitled by stream title is 
 limited to margin. 6 
 
 Riparian rights, c 
 
 a 10 Wall. 110, SrhoolsB Risley. 
 6 10 Wall. 504, Yaies v. Milwaukee 
 c 21 Wall. 392, Atlee v. Pack. Co. 
 6 23 Willi. 65. St,. Claire Lovmg- 
 pton. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 741, Leav. E. B. u. U. S. 
 6 93 U. S. 173. French v. Pyan. 
 c 97 U. S. 347, Martin v. Marks. 
 a 99 U. S. 475, R. E. Co. v. Ailing. 
 
 KALLBOAD v. SCHUTTB, 100 V. S. 644. 
 
 Snp. Court; supersedeas; Irand. a 1 a 102 TJ. S. 371, Draper v. Davis. 
 KAILROAB V. SMITH, 9 "Wall. 97. 
 
 Grants; in presenti to the States 
 of land for railroads, a 
 
 Land olflcers ; when their action 
 conclusive. 6 
 
 Swamp lands, c 
 
 RAILROAD V. TEJTNKSSKB, 101 U. S. 337. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- a 101 U. S. 834, E. E. Co. v. Ala. 
 tracts; right of the State to with- 
 draw consent to bo sued, a 
 
 EAILKO AD, THOMPSON v. See Thompson v. Railroad. 
 
 KAIIROAIJ T. TRIMBIiE, 10 Wall, 367. 
 
 Patent law; assignments, a i a 14 Wall. 457. Pav. Co. D.Jenkins. 
 
 . I a 98 U. S. 553; Headrie v. Sayles. 
 
 BAILBOAD, TURRIM, v. See Turrill v. Railroad. 
 
 BAILEOAD, V. S. v. See U.- S. 1;. Railroad. 
 
 RAILROAD V. -WISWAXI,, 23 'WaU. 608. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error j a 94 U. S. 5, Hoadley c. San Fran, 
 lies on order remanding a cause, a i 
 
 a 101 U. S. 711, expaHe E. E. Co. 
 
 RAILWAY V. AXMNG, 99 U. S. 470. 
 
 I.and grants to railroads ; when 
 grant takes etfect ; constrnction of 
 the acts of Congress of 1872, 1877 ; 
 (17 St. 399, 19 St. 405 ;) right of way 
 through'the public lands, a 
 RAIL WAT, BROOKS v. See Brooks v. Railway. 
 RAILWAY v. McCarthy, 96 C. S. 258. 
 
 Corporations ; evidence of corpo- I a 102 U. S. 420, Daniels v. Tearney. 
 rate existence ; estoppel, a I 
 
 RAILWAY T. McSHANE, 38 WaU. 460. 
 
 Public lands; exemption from 
 State taxation, a 
 
 When pre-emptor becomes the 
 equitable owner. 6 
 
 a 22 Wall. 475, Hunnewell v. Cass. 
 a 95 U. S. 265, Col. Co. v. Com'rs. 
 b 98 U. S. 121, Wirth v. Branson. 
 a 98 U. S. 545, R. R. Co. v. Com'rs. 
 
 RAILWAY V. PBESCOTT, 16 Wall. 607. 
 
 Public lands; exemption from 
 State taxation, a 
 
 a 22 Wall. 460, E. R. v. McShano. 
 a 95 U. S. 265, Col. Co.«. Com'rs. 
 a 97 U. S. 182, Lamborii v. County 
 
 BAH, WAY V. BAMSEY, 22 W^all. 
 
 U. S. courts ; removals. « 
 Citizenship, h 
 
 323. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 403, Bridges v. Sperry. 
 b 97 U. S. 648, Robertson v. Cease. 
 
244 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUBT DECISIONS. 
 
 RAILWAY V. ■WHITTON, 13 WaU. 889. 
 
 Removals, a 
 
 Jiiri=cliction of the Federal courts 
 not aftfected by State legislation, h 
 
 When jurisdiction exclusive, c 
 
 Railroads ; effect of consolidation 
 on jurisdiction of the U. S. courts; 
 citizenship, d. 
 
 Foreign corporations; suits 
 against, e 
 
 a 18 Wall. 580, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 6 20 Wall. 453, Ins. Co. v. Morse. 
 c 92 U. S. 18, Gaines v. Fuentes. 
 d 94 U. S. 447, MuUer n. Dows. 
 e 96 U. S. 376, ex parte Scholen- 
 
 a 100 U. S. 265, Tenn. v. Davis. 
 
 KAIIWAT GKOSS RECEIPTS. See State Tax on Railway Gfross Receipts. 
 RAINS, McKEE v. See McKee v. Eains. 
 RAMSAT V. AXEGBE, la Wh. 611. 
 
 Maritime contracts, a I as 3 H. 573, AndrevfS v. Wall. 
 
 Liens; waiver. 6 | & 1 Bl. 332, The St. Lawrence. 
 
 RAMSEY, DrxON v. See Dixon v. Ramsey. 
 RAMSEY, lidHiOW T. See Ludlow v. Ramsey. 
 RAMSEY, McFAtTL v. See McFaul v. Ramsey. 
 RAMSEY, RAILWAY v. See Railway v. Ramsey. 
 RANDALL v. HOWARD, 8 Bl. 686. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction, a 
 Illegal contract ; particeps crim- 
 inis. 6 
 
 a 2 Wall. 633, Minn. v. St. Paul. 
 b 21 Wall. 480, Fox v. Gardner. 
 a 101 U. S. 554, Nougue c. Clapp. 
 
 RANDELL V. BRIGHAM, t WaU. 641 
 
 a 9 Wall 
 
 U. S. courts; when bound by de- 
 cisions of State courts, a 
 Judicial officers ; liability. 6 
 
 37, Gut V. The State. 
 h 13 Wall. 350, Bradley v. Fisher. 
 a 21 Wall. 497, B. R. Co. v. Penn. 
 
 RANDELL v. BROWN, 3 H. 416, 
 
 Liens by contract, a 
 RANDELL, CROWBLL v. See Crowell v. Randell. 
 RANDOLPH, SAGE v. See Sage v. Randolph. 
 RANDOLPH CO. T. POST, 93 U. S. 503. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; recitals; conditions; estop- 
 pel ; bona-fide purcliasers. a 
 
 RANDON V. TOBY, 11 H. 617. 
 
 U. S. courts ; how far the prac- 
 tice of affected by codes of the 
 States; law and equity must be 
 kept separate, a 
 
 a 9 Wall. 382, Bank v. Nock. 
 
 a 9S U. 8. 102, Daviess v. Huide- 
 koper. 
 
 al8H. 61, Graham w. Bayne. 
 a 20 H. 525, McFaul v. Ramsey. 
 a 23 H. 486, Green v. Custard. 
 a 1 Bl. 314, Farni ». Tesson. 
 
 RANKIN V. HOYT, 4 H. 387. 
 
 Duties ; appraisers, a 
 When appraisal must be fol- 
 lowed ; parol evidence. 6 
 
 RANNELS, CARPENTER v. See Carpenter v. Rannels. 
 
 a 10 H. 234, Greeley v. Thompson. 
 b 16 H. 269, Bartlett v. Kane. 
 6 24 H. 522, Belcher v. Linn. 
 a 10 Wall. 453, Kimball v. Coll'r, 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 245 
 
 BAPED, THE, 8 Cr. 155. 
 
 Prize ; non-importation acts, a a 8 Cr. 179, The Alexander. 
 Contractsbetwoencitlzensofhos- a 8 Cr. 440, TJie St. Lawrence. 
 tile States, b t 7 P. 592, SoliolefielU v. Eicliel- 
 
 bers'er. 
 b 18 H. Ill, Jcckere. Montgomery 
 b 5 Wall. 405, The Wm. Bagaley. 
 b 6 Wall. 535, Hanger v. Abbott. 
 6 7 Wall. 557, Coppell v. Hall. 
 
 BAPtET, FOWXBB T. See Fowler v. Eapley. 
 EATHBONE, FOWXEB v. See Fowler v. Rathbone. 
 BATUFFE, SCOTT v. See Scott v. Eatliffe. 
 BAVENEl, FOUNTAIN" v. See Fountain v. BaveneL 
 BAY V. LAW, 3 Cr. 179. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 
 a 10 Wh. 502, The Palmyra. 
 al3P. 11, Whiting u. Bank U.S. 
 a 19 H. 284, Beebe v. Knssell. 
 a 2 Bl. 531, Bronson v. R. K. Co. 
 a 7 Wall. 346, Thompson v. Dean. 
 a 17 Wall. 17, Marin o. Lally. 
 a 23 Wall. 409, Railroad d. Svvasey. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 418, Mays v. Frittoii. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 682, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 a 101 U. S. 203, Pompton U.Cooper 
 Union. 
 
 BAT, MATOB V. See Mayor v. Bay. 
 EAT V. SMITH, 17 Wall. 413. 
 
 Supreme Court ; objections must 
 first be taken in the court below, a 
 
 EAT V. TAN STCKLK, 96 TJ. S. 683 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; conditions; recitals; estop- 
 pel ; boua-fide holders, a 
 EATBIONB, COOPEE v. See Cooper «. Eaymond. 
 EATMOND V. THTSON, 17 H. 59. 
 
 Affreightment; lien of shipown- j a 5 Wall. 558, The Bird of Paradise 
 er; waiver, a I 
 
 BEAD, BO AEDMAN v. See Boardman. v. Bead. 
 BEAD T. GAEDNEE, 17 Wall. 409. 
 
 Supreme Court; objections must J a 20 Wall. 419, Mays ». Fritton. 
 first be taken in the court below, a j 
 BEADING, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Beading. 
 BECTOE V. ASHXET, 6 W^aU. 148, 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error- to 
 State court; Federal question, a 
 
 Land titles unUer U. S. ; when 
 party acquires vested interpst in the 
 land; surveys, b 
 
 a 8 Wall. 317, Gibson p.Choutean. 
 b 9 Wall. 197, Prisbiei). Whitney. 
 a 14 Wall. 21, Steinesu. Franklin. 
 a 16 Wall. 189, Smith v. Adsit. 
 a 20 Wall. 628, Murdock v. Mem- 
 phis. 
 a 21 Wall. 639, Moore ». Mississippi 
 6 92 U. S. 713, Hot Springs Cases. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 65, U. S. v. Peck. 
 
 BEED T. INS. CO., 95 V. S. 83. 
 
 Contracts; subject-niattercanbe I 
 shown by parol, a j 
 
 BEED V. MAESH, 13 P. 153. . 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to I a 15 H. 207, Kaiiouse v. Martin. 
 State court ; Federal question, a I 
 
246 MANUAL OF SUPEEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BEED, FKATT v. See Pratt v. Eeed. 
 KEED v. PBOPKIETOBS, 8 H. 3»1. 
 
 Verdict without a judgment; no I a 16 Wall. 561, Smith v. McCool. 
 estoppel, a ) 
 
 BEED, BOSS V. See Eoss v. Eeed. 
 
 BEED V. U. S,, 11 Wall. 591. 
 
 U.S.; liability-ill Coiirtof Claims; I a 14 Wall. 534, Morgan v. U. S. 
 contracts ; torts. « | a 93 U. S. 239, Sliaw v. U. S. 
 
 BEES, GKJULD v. See Goald v. Eees. 
 
 BEES V. TTATEKTOTTN, 19 MVall. 1(K. 
 
 U. S. courts; no jurisdiction to 
 levy tax ; mandamus to State offi- 
 cers to levy tax; resignation, a 
 
 BEESE, V. S. V. See U. S. ■«. Eeese. 
 
 BEESIDE V. WAUKEK, 11 H. gS'J. 
 
 U.S.; contracts; credits; set- 
 offs, a 
 
 Public offlcei-s; control o£ courts 
 over. 6 
 
 BEEVES, BAILBOAD v. See Eailroad v. Eeeves. 
 BEFOEM, THE, 3 Wall. 617. 
 
 The civil war; commercial inter- 1 a 6 Wall. 531, Ouachita Cotton, 
 course ; license to trade, a \a7 Wall. 556, Coppell v. Hall. 
 
 BEGISTEE, LITCHFIELD v. See Lltchfleld v. Register. 
 
 BEICHABT V. PHELPS, 6 WaU. 160. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 658, Heine v. I^. Com'rs 
 
 a 93 U. S. 265, Barkley v- ^iiw& 
 
 Commissionei's. 
 
 a 6 WaU. 488, U. S. v. Eckford. 
 b 9 Wall. 312, Secretary v. McGar- 
 rahan. 
 
 Land titles; patent for land re- 
 served or sold void, a 
 
 When nullity can be shown in 
 action at law. b 
 
 BEICHE V. SMYTHE, 13 WaU. 168. 
 
 Revenue laws ; construction ; 
 general words, a 
 
 a 18 Wall. 117, Best v. Polk. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 675, Morton ». Nebraska 
 
 b 93 U. S. 216, Sherman v. Buick. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 147, Movius v. Artlinr. 
 a 96 U. S. Ill, Arthur v. Morrison. 
 a 96 U. S. 113, Arthur v. Lahey. 
 a 96 U. S. 127, Arthur v. Stephani. 
 BEID, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Eeid. 
 
 KEID, WEBSTEB v. See Webster v. Eeid. 
 EEID, WILM. B. E. v. See Wilm. E. E. „. Eeid. 
 EEILY V. LAMAB, 8 Cr. 34S. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals; eita- j a 2 Wh. 137, The San Pedro. 
 t'°"- " I 0! 18 H. 534, Hudgins v. Kemp. 
 
 BEIKDEEB, THE, 8 WaU. 403. 
 
 Admiralty; suits in rem; pro- | a 9 Wall. 457, The Maggie Ham- 
 cess, a I moud. 
 
 EEINECKEB, CHIBAC v. See Chirac v. Reinecker. 
 
 BEINTZEL, MOBGAN v. See Morgan v. Eeintzel. 
 
 BELF, GAINES V. See Gaines v. Eelf. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 247 
 
 KEMOVAJL CASES, 100 TJ. S. 457. 
 
 Eemovals ; act of 1875. a 
 Eight not lost by contesting case 
 in the State court. 6 
 
 KENHEB V. BANK OF COI^TTDIBIA, 
 
 Negotiable paper ; days of grace ; 
 custom, fit 
 
 Secondary evidence ; lost or de- 
 stroyed instruments. 6 
 
 a 101 U. S. 187, Ayres v. Canei-: 
 a 101 U. S. 298, R. K. «. Kt-tchnm. 
 a 101 U. S. 612, Bible Soc. v. Grove 
 a 102 U. S. 141, R. R. Co. v. Miss. 
 6 102 U. S. 179. JiJkins!). Svveetzer 
 
 9 Wli. 58^. 
 
 a 9 Wh. 598, McGnider v. Bank. 
 a 11 Wh. 431, Mills v. Bank IJ- S. 
 a 12 Wh. 297, Ogden v. Samulcrs. 
 a 1 P. 25, B'k Wash. r. Triplett. 
 a 3 P. 36, Thornton I!. B'k Wash, 
 a 6 P. .51, Bunk U. S. v. Dunn, 
 a 6 P. 691, U. S. u. Anedondo. 
 a 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 a 14 P. 318, Fowler v. Bramly. 
 a 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 a 15 H. 535, Adams v. Otterback. 
 a 23 H. 432, Bliven v. Screw Co. 
 h 20 Wall. 134, Burton v. Driggs. 
 6 20 Wall. 246, Cornett u. Williams 
 6 20 Wall. 288, McPhaulu.Lapsley 
 
 KENNER V. MABSHAlIi, 1 'WTi. 816. 
 
 Jurisdiction; attachments, a I a 13 P. 143, Wallaces. McConnell. 
 Damages; iuquiry by jury, b | 6 7 Wall. 104, Aurora v. West. 
 
 KEPITIGNT, U. S. V. See U. S. i). Bepitigny. 
 RESOI.UTE V. NOKTHEKNEB, 1 TFaU. 688. 
 
 Territorial courts; admiralty ju- | a 101 U. S. 461, City of Panama, 
 risdiction. a I 
 
 BEW, SCHOtET V. See Scholey v. Rew. 
 
 BEY V. SIMPSON, 83 H. 341. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; indorsers. a | a 95 U. S. 94, Good v. Martin. 
 BEYBCEN, CLABK v. See Clark u. Eeybum. 
 BEYNES, U. S. V. See IT. S. v. Eeynes. 
 EEYNOIiDS, COOPEB v. See Cooper v. Eeynolds. 
 EETfNOlDS, DIAX. v. See Dial v. Eeynolds. 
 BEYNOtDS, DOUGIiASS v. See DoaglasB v. Eeynolds. 
 BEYNOtDS V. McAETHUB, 8 P. 434. 
 
 Statutes ; construed prospective- | a 2 H. 588, Ladiga v. Roland. 
 ly. a I 
 
 BHEIMS, AETHUB v. See Arthur o. Eheims. 
 EHETT V. POE, 8 H. 457. 
 
 Negotiable paper; notice and pro- 
 test; regularity a question of law 
 for the court, a 
 
 EHINELANBEB v. INS. CO., 4 Cr. 89. 
 
 a 18 H. 517, Watson v. Tarpley. 
 
 Marine insurance ; total loss, a 
 
 a 4 Cr. 202, Marshall v. Ins. Co. 
 a 3 Wh. 189, Oliverau.tJn.Ins.Co. 
 a 12 P. 391, Bradlie v. Md. Ins. Co. 
 
248 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BHODE ISLAND v. MASSACHUSETTS, 18 P. 1114,. 
 
 Supreme Court ; original juris- 
 diction; practice; suits between 
 States ; boundaries, a 
 
 JurisdictloQ. b 
 
 Political questions, c 
 
 Equity; reformation of contracts. 
 d 
 
 Demurrer; limitations, e 
 
 a 12 P. 756, Khode Island v, Mass. 
 
 a 13 P. 23, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 a 14 P. 210, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 a 15 P. 269, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 b 2 H. 335, Grignon v. Astor. 
 
 a 4 H. 628, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 c 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 a 17 H. 490, Florida v. Georgia, 
 
 c 6 Wall. 71, Georgia «. Stanton 
 
 b 6 Wall. 187, Riggs v. Johnson. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 53, Virginia v. W. Va. 
 
 c 92 U. S. 133, Phillips v. Payne. 
 
 d 98 U. S. 82, Irvinson v. Hutton 
 S. 568, Bank J). Carpenter. 
 
 See Hervey v. B. I. Loo. Works. 
 
 e 101 U, 
 RHODE ISLAND LOC. WORKS, HERVEY v. 
 RIBON T. RAILROAD CO., 16 "WaU. 450. 
 
 Parties, a | a 18 Wall. 475, R. R. Co. v. Orr. 
 
 RICARD V. WILLIAMS, 1 Wh. 60. 
 
 Adverse possession; ouster; dis- 1 as 5 P. 430, Bradstreet v. Hunting- 
 
 seizui. a \ 
 
 BICE V. MINX. & N. W. R. R. CO., ai H. 85. 
 
 ton. 
 
 Sup. Court ; admiralty appeals ; 
 amendments and new proofs, a 
 
 BICBv. MENN. & N. W. B. B. CO., 
 
 Corporate privileges; construc- 
 tion most strongly against corpora- 
 tion, a 
 
 Land grants bj"^ Congress to the 
 States ; when title vests. 6 
 
 RICE, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Rice. 
 RICH V. LAMBERT, la H. 358. 
 
 Supreme Court ; amount in con- 
 troversy, a 
 
 Carriers ; bound to show that loss 
 was occasioned by peril from wliich 
 they were exempt, b 
 
 Admiralty ; jurisdiction over con- 
 tracts of affreightment c 
 
 Depositions ; objections to. d 
 
 I a 6 Wall. 442, The Grace Girdler. 
 
 1 Bl. 380. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 512, Holyoke v. Lyman 
 b 21 Wall. 62, Schulenberg v. 
 
 Harrimau. 
 a 92 U. S. 741, R. R. Co. v. U. S. 
 a 101 U. S. 540, R. R. Co. v. Phila 
 
 a 17 H. 4, Shields v. Thomas. 
 
 6 21 H. 29, Niagara v. Cordes. 
 
 c 23 H. 494, Morevvood»Enrequlst 
 
 & 1 Bl. 160, Nelson v. Woodruff. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 210, Seaver v. Bigelow. 
 
 6 9 Wall. 459, The Haggle Ham- 
 mond. 
 
 d 15 Wall. 161, Shutte v. Tliomp- 
 soii. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 148, Pav. Co. v Mnlford 
 Richard. 
 
 BICHABD, V. a. V. See U. S. 
 BICHABDS, COLLBCTOB v. See Colleotor v. Eiehards. 
 RICHARDS, SMITH v. See Smith v. Eiehards. 
 RICHARDSON V. BOSTON, 19 H. 863. 
 
 Municipal corporations; liabil- 
 
 Court can direct a verdict. 6 
 
 RICHARDSON V. BOSTON, 84 H. 188. 
 
 Judgments ; when they can be | a 
 
 a 24 H. 191, Richardson v. Boston. 
 a 100 U. S. 27, R. R. Co. v. Fraloff 
 
 pleaded in bar. a 
 
 RICHARDSON, CODDINGTON v. 
 
 7 Wall. 99, Aurora v. West. 
 a 91 U. S. 534, Gould v. R. R. Co. 
 
 See Ooddington i). Richardson. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 249 
 
 KICHARDSON T. DOANE, 3 Dall. 108. See Penhallow v. Doane. 
 
 Facts foiincl byjniy; cannot be 
 re-examined in U. S. courts, a 
 
 a 21 H. 167, Barreda v. SiUby. 
 
 a 23 H. 219. Phil. & B. R. R. Co. v. 
 
 'I'ovvboat Co. 
 b 5 Wall. 494, The Eildy. 
 
 BICHAKDSON v. GODDAKD, 33 H. 37, 
 
 Sunday laws ; violation of. a 
 Affreightment ; duty of carriers 
 as to delivery. 6 
 
 KICHMOND, THE, 9 Cr. 108. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; seizures 1 a 9 Wli. 399, The Merino, 
 under laws of the U.S. a \ 
 
 RICHMOND V. MTLWAtJKEE, 81 H. 391. 
 
 Sup. Coint ; amount in contro- I a 6 Wall. 442, The Grace Girdler, 
 versy ; aflBdavits. a \ 
 
 RICHMOND V. SMITH, 15 Wall. 437. 
 
 Supreme Conrt ; review of find- i a 18 Wall. 252, Ins. 
 ings of tacts, a | 
 
 RICH^IO^fD R. R. CO. V. iOUISA R, 
 
 Power of the Legislature to bind 
 the State by contract, a 
 
 Construction in favor of the pub- 
 lic. 6 
 
 Sup. Conrt ; writ of error to State 
 court ; highest conrt of State, c 
 
 Co. V. Folsom- 
 
 R. CO., 13 H. 71. 
 
 a 10 H. 430, Ohio Co. v. Debolt. 
 b 1 Bl. 380, Rice v. R. R. Co. 
 a 1 Bl. 442. .;eff. Bank v. Skelly. 
 c 23 Wal 1 . 306, Gi'egory v McVeigh 
 c 102 U. S. 254, Williams v. Braffy. 
 
 RIDDLE, MANDERVILIE v. See JlanderviUe v. Riddle. 
 RIDDtE V. MANDEVIIiE, 5 Cr. 338. 
 
 Equity ; follows the law as to I a 15 Wall. 229, Oelrichs v. Spain, 
 liability on contracts, a I 
 
 RIDDtE V. MOSS, 7 Cr. 800. 
 
 Evidence ; incompetency ; Inter- I a 11 P. 91, U. S. v. Lefler. 
 est. a I 
 
 BIDDI.E, TJ. S. V. See U. S. v. Riddle. 
 
 KIDDLBBERGEK v. HARTEORD INS. CO., 7 Wall. 390. 
 
 Limitations; policy of stale claims. 
 Insurance ; conditions. 6 
 
 a 
 
 a IS Wall. 70, Weber v. Com'rs. 
 6 21 Wall. 269, Exp. Co. v Caldwell 
 
 BIDGWAT, HERNDON v. See Herndon v. Eidgway. 
 RIGGIN V. MAGWrRE, 15 Wall. 549. 
 
 Bankruptcy; contingent debts, a | a 9'J U. S. 8, Wolf v. Stix. 
 
 RIGGS V. JOHNSON CO., 6 TVall. 184. 
 
 U. S. courts ; State court cannot 
 enjoin, a 
 
 Process acts ; lien of judgments 
 by State law. 6 
 
 Mandamus by U. S. courts, c 
 
 Process ; independent of the 
 State law. d 
 
 6 Wall. 
 
 7 Wall. 
 
 7 Wall. 
 
 8 Wall. 
 
 9 Wall. 
 9 Wall. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 
 b 12 Wall, 
 c 15 Wall. 
 c 19 Wall, 
 c 19 Wall. 
 d94U. S. 
 
 517, U. S. V. Keokuk. 
 217, Brown v. Pierce. 
 612, Mor-gan v. Clerk. 
 584, Butz V. Muscatine. 
 311, Sec. V. McGarrahan 
 414, Mayor v. Lord. 
 138, Amy v. Supervisbrs 
 158, Baker v. Morton. 
 428, Graham v. Norton. 
 117, Rees v. Watertovvn. 
 657, Heine v. Comni'rs. 
 350, ex parte Flippin. 
 
250 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 KIGGS V. LINDSAY, 7 Cr. 500. 
 
 Pleaduif,'; general counts; as- I a 9 P. 562,C.& O. Canalw.Knapp. 
 surapsit. a \ 
 
 BIGGS, MATJDEBVII-I.E v. See Manderville i). Elggs. 
 BIGGS, TAYI.OE v. See Tayloe d Eiggs. 
 BIGGS V. TAYIiOE, 9 Wli. 483. 
 
 Eviileiice ; to prove loss of paper ; I a IP. 594, Tayloe v. Elggs. 
 secondaiy evidence, a I a 20 Wall. 134, Burton v. Driggs. 
 
 BIGGS, THOMPSON v. See Thompson v. Biggs. 
 BINGO v. BINNS, 10 P. 69. 
 
 a 4 H. 552, Michoud v. Girod. 
 
 Agent cannot acquire an interest 
 in subject-matter of agency adverse 
 to his principal, a 
 
 BINGOI-IJ, LEVY COUBT v. See Levy Court v. Ringold. 
 
 BINGOLD, U. S. V. See U. S. o. Ringold. 
 
 BIPLEY, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Ripley. 
 
 BISLEY, THE SCHOOLS v. See Schools, The, v. Risley. 
 
 BITCHIE, BANK OF U. S. v. See Bank of U. S. v. Ritchie. 
 
 BITCHIE, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Ritchie. 
 
 BITCHIE, IT. S. V. See U. S. v. Ritchie. 
 
 BIVES, GILMAN v. See Oilman v. Rives. 
 
 BOACH V. CHAPMAN, 83 H. 139. 
 
 Admiralty inrisdiction; maritime j a 21 Wall. 555, Edwards «. Elliott, 
 contracts, a | 
 
 BOACH V. HULINGS, 16 P. 319. 
 
 What error can be noticed by 
 the court of their own motion, a 
 
 Verdict ; what defects it covers. 6 
 
 Act of 1789. sec. 32, as to ver- 
 dicts, c 
 
 a 4 H. 143, Garland ». Davis. 
 6 7 H. 714, 'I'ownsend v. Jennisoii 
 c 12 H. 42, Parks v. Turner, 
 c 13 H. 214, Morsel I v. Hall, 
 a 12 Wall. 403, Barth v. Clise. 
 
 BOBBINS V. CHICAGO, 4 WaU. 679. 
 
 Corporations ; liability for inju- i a 15 Wall. 658, Ei E. v. Haniiing. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 576, Water Co. «. Ware. 
 
 ries caused by contractors, a 
 
 Ees judicata. 6 
 
 I 6 92 U. S. 394. Sraeltzer u. White. 
 
 BOBBINS, CHICAGO v. See Chicago v. Bobbins. 
 BOBBINS, MOOEE v. See Moore v. Bobbins. 
 BOBBINS, WALKBB v. See Walker v. Bobbins. 
 BOBEBTS, EX PAETB, 15 Wall. 384. 
 
 Supreme Court; appeals; allow- I a lOlU. S. 752,Goddardu.Ordwav 
 ance of. a | 
 
 BOBEBTS V. BOLLES, 101 U. S. 119. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- a 101 U. S. 
 roads; subscription witliout prior 
 election ; power of the Illinois Leg- 
 islature under the constitution of 
 1848. a 
 
 BOBEBTS, COOPEB v. See Cooper ■». Roberts. 
 
 415, Livingston Co. v. 
 Darlington. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 251 
 
 BOBBRTS V. COOPER, ao H. 481. 
 
 Supreme Court; maadate; second a 11 Wall. 674, Cook v. Burnley, 
 writ of error, a a 17 Wall. 284, Tyler v. Magvvlre. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 462, The Lady Pike. 
 
 ROBERTS, IiENOX v. See Lenox v. Roberts. 
 ROBERTS, PILIiOW v. See Pillow ■». Roberts. 
 ROBERTSON, BACON v. See Bacon 1). Robertson. 
 ROBERTSON V. CARSON, 19 Wall. 103. 
 
 Executors ; ohargiug sureties ; 
 investment in Confederate securi- 
 ties, a 
 
 ROBERTSON, FAW v. See Faw v. Robertson 
 ROBERTSON, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Robertson 
 ROBESON, U. S. V. See U. S. i). Robeson. 
 ROBINSON V. CAMPBELL, 3 Wh. 813. 
 
 U. S. courts; common law and 
 equity jnrisdietion must be kept 
 separate, a 
 
 a 97 U. S. 567, McBurneyi). Carson 
 
 Boundaries between States. 6 
 
 Contracts ; by what law gov- 
 erned, c 
 
 U. S. courts ; when they will be 
 governed by the decisions of the 
 State courts, d 
 
 Ejectment ; the patent carries 
 the fee and is the better title, e 
 
 Judicial power of U. S. ; cases at 
 common law and in equity, f 
 
 TJ. S. courts ; enforce the laws of 
 the States, g 
 
 a 6 P. 654, Boyle v. Zacharie. 
 a 6 P. 767, Strother v. Lucas, 
 a 9 P. 632, Livingston v. Story. 
 6 12 P. 745, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 c 8 H. 464, Leroy v. Beard. 
 d 12 H. 145, Rnssell v. Southard. 
 a 13 H. 270, Neves v. Scott. 
 a 13 H. 557, Penn. v. Bridge Co. 
 e 10 H. 334, Bryan ». Forsyth. 
 a 20 H. 17, .Jones v. McMasters. 
 /20 H. 558, Irvine v. Marshall. 
 a 21 H. 482, Fenn v. Holme. 
 a 2 Bl. 509, Noonan v. Lee. 
 a G Wall. 137, Thompson v. R. B. 
 a 7 Wall. 430, Payne v. Hook. 
 a 8 Wall. 322, Clark v. Reyburn. 
 g 13 Wall. 243, ex parte McNeil. 
 a 99 U. S. 381, Van Norden v. 
 Morton. 
 
 ROBINSON, CATHCART v. See Cathoart i). Robinson. 
 BOBINSON, COIT T. See Coit v. Robinson. 
 ROBINSON, HARRIS v. See Harris v. Robinson. 
 ROBINSON V. NOBLE, 8 P. 198. 
 
 Tender of payment, a 
 
 Damages for failure to pay. 6 
 ROBY, PROOT V. See Pront d. Roby. 
 ROCCA, THE OREGON v. See Oregon, The, -o. Rocca. 
 ROCHEREAU, LASERE v. See Lasere v. Roohereau. 
 ROCHESTER, BLIGHT v. See Blight v. Rochester. 
 BOCK, RAILROAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Rook. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 678, Thompson v. Riggs 
 b 16 Wall. 502, P. Bank v. U. Bank 
 
 ROCK CREEK v. STRONG, 93 U. S. 29, 
 
 Statutes ; when directory, a 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; recitals; conditions; es- 
 toppel ; bona-iide holders. 6 
 
 a 99 U. S. 217, Sup'v'rs v Galbralth 
 6 99 U. S. 683, Ork-ans v. Piatt. 
 6 99 U. S. 686, Lyons w. Mnnson. 
 
252 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 ROCKHOtD V. ROCKHOtD, 93 V. 
 
 Supreme Convt ; writ of error 
 to State courts; Federal questions 
 arisins: out of the civil war. a 
 
 s. lao. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 287, Ins.Co.w.Hendren. 
 a 93 U. S. 589. U. S. ». Tliompson. 
 a 98 U. S. 333, Bank v. McVeigli. 
 
 BODES, BBONSON v. See Bronson v. Eodes. 
 KODGEBS, ITIiE v. See Lyle v. Rodgers. 
 BODMAN, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Rodman. 
 BODRIGUEZ V. TJ. S., 1 "Wall. 691. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; fail- 
 ure to contest survey, a 
 
 BOEMEB V. SIMON, 95 V. S. 314. 
 
 Patent law ; examination of wit- 
 nesses ; notice ; obiections, when 
 waived, a 
 
 a 18 Wall. 269, Henshaw v. Bissell. 
 
 a 101 IT. S. 492, Mach. Co. u. Keith 
 
 BOGEBS V. BtJBEINGTON, 3 Wall. 654. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads in Iowa ; powers of the Legis- 
 lature to authorize, a 
 
 Municipal corporations ; legisla- 
 tive control over. 6 
 
 a 4 Wall. 274, Mitchell c.Burl'ton. 
 a 5 Wall. 779, Sup'v'rs v. Schenlj. 
 6 10 Wall. 52, R.R.ii.Meni.E.E. 
 a 10 Wall. 663, St. Joseph w Rosers 
 a 17 Wall. 330, U. S. v. R. R. Co. 
 
 BOGEBS, EAELY v. See Early v. Rogers. 
 BOGEBS, liEE CO. V. See Lee Co. v. Rogers. 
 BOGEBS V. MABSHAX, 1 Wall. 644. 
 
 Bill of exceptions, a 
 Instructions to jui-y. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 338, Harvey v. Tyler. 
 b 16 Wall. .516, Tweed's Case. 
 a 93 U. S. 54, Beaver v. Taylor. 
 a 93 U. S. 295. R. R. Co. v. Horst. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty. 
 6 91 U. S. 701, The Colorado, 
 c 92 U. S. 438, The America. 
 
 BOGEBS v. ST. CHABLES, 19 H. 113. 
 
 Supreme Court; amount in con- 
 troversy, a 
 Collision ; rate of speed. 6 
 Apportionment of damages, c 
 
 BOGEBS, ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP v. See St. Joseph Township v. Rogers. 
 BOGEBS, SUPEBVISOBS v. See Supervisors v. Rogers. 
 BOGEBS, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Rogers. 
 BOGEBS, WAISH V. See Walsh v. Rogers. 
 BOMEEO V. V. S., 1 WaU. 743. 
 California ;_Mexican titles ; ter- 1 a 6 Wall. 435, Mumford «. Wardell. 
 
 mination of Mexican rule, a 
 
 BOMXE V. CASANOVA, 91 TJ. S. 379. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error I a 92 U. S. 724, McSteav Friedman, 
 to State court ; Federal question, a \ 
 
 BONKENDOBE v. TAYI.OB, 4 P. 358. 
 
 Tax titles, a I o 9 H. 256, Mason v. Fearson. 
 
 I a 16 H. 615, Early v. Doe. 
 
 BOOSEVELl V. MEYEB, 1 WaU. 513. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error I a 12 Wall. 692, Trebilcockw Wilson, 
 to State court; Federal question, a \ i 
 
 BOOTS, McCABTT v. See MoOarty v. Roots. 
 EOSE, HIMELEY v. See Himeley v. Rose. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 253 
 
 ROSE V. HIMELT, 4 Cr. 841. 
 
 Admiralty jurisrliction ; foreign 
 ooiKlemiiation for breach of munici- 
 pal laws, a 
 
 Political question ; recognition 
 of new States, b 
 
 Constitution ; faith and credit to 
 be given to judgments ; jurisdic- 
 tion, c 
 
 Prize ; condemnation, d 
 
 Sovereign and belligerent rights. e 
 
 a G Cr. 285, Hudson v. Gnostier. 
 6 3 Wh; 303, Gelston v. Hoyr. 
 c 3 H. 756, Hickcv v. Stewart, 
 c 6 H. 30, Bank U. S. v. Sims, 
 c 8 H. 531, Williamson v. Berry. 
 d 13 H. 512, Jecker v. Montgomery 
 6 14 H. 44, Kennett v. Chambers, 
 e 2 Bl. 673, Prize Cases. 
 e 11 "Wall. 307, Miller v. U. S. 
 b 13 Wall. 649, Wiiite v. Hart, 
 c IS Wall. 461, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 BOSE V. HnOXT, S Cr. 313. 
 
 Mandates ; second appeals. 
 
 See Himely v. Rose. 
 
 a 10 Wh. 434, The Santa Maria, 
 a 9 P. 286, Boyee v. Grundy. 
 a 12 P. 491, ex parte Sibbold. 
 a 3 H. 424, Bridge Co. v. Stewart. 
 a 15 H. 464, Corning v. Factory. 
 a 20 H. 480, Koberts v. Cooper. 
 
 EOSE, PEIHAM v. See Pelham v. Eose. 
 
 BOSE, B. B. CO. V. See Eailroad v. Rose. 
 
 EOSE, U. S. T. See V. S. v. Eose. 
 
 EOSELIO'S EXECUTOR, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Eoseliu's Executor. 
 
 BOSENBUBGH, TJ. S. v. See U. S. v. Eosenburgh. 
 
 BOSS V. BABLAUB, 1 P. 663. 
 
 Land titles ; conflicting pateijts ; 
 ejectment, a 
 
 Federal law must govern in con- 
 struction of patent, b 
 
 Doctrine of relation, c 
 
 Ejectment on imperfect titles, d 
 
 BOSS V. DUVAl, 13 P. 63. 
 
 Limitations; when statute be- 
 gins to run; repeal of saving 
 clause, a 
 
 U. S. courts ; lien of judgments ; 
 the laws of the States a rule of 
 decision. 6 
 
 BOSS, HOGAX V, See Hogan v. Eoss. 
 BOSS, M'CHnSG T. See M'Clnng d. Ross. 
 BOSS, PABKS V. See Parks v. Eoss. 
 BOSS V. BEED, 1 Wh. 488. 
 
 Jurisdiction of special boards. a\ aS Wall. 83, U. S. v. Speed. 
 BOSS, TJ. S. V. See U. S. v. Eoss, 
 BOTHWELI. V. DEWEE8, 8 Bl. 613. 
 
 Landlord and tenant; when pur- 
 chase by tenant will enure to bene- 
 fit of landlord, a 
 BOUSE, HAMPTON v. See Hampton 
 KOUSE, HOME OF FEIEND1.ESS v 
 
 a 13 P. 446, Bagnell v. Broderiok. 
 b 13 P. 509, Wilcox v. Jackson. 
 c 4 H. 456, Les Bois v. Bramell. 
 a 18 H. 21, KisseH v. Scliools. 
 d 19 H. 334, Bryan v. Forsyth, 
 c 21 H. 240, French v. Spenser. 
 
 a 7 H. 778, Lewis v. Lewis. 
 6 2 Bl. 442, Ward v. Cliamberlain. 
 6 2 Bl. 603, Leffingwell D.Warren. 
 a 17 Wall. 600, Sohn v. Watterson. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 455, Williams v. Mollis. 
 
 . Eouse. 
 See Home of Friendless v. Eouse. 
 
 BOUSE, MONBEBGEB V. See Lionberger v. Eouse. 
 
254 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 KOUSE, WASHINGTON VS. v. See Washington University v. Rouse. 
 ROUSMANIEBE, HUNT v. »See Hunt v. Eonsmaniere. 
 ROUSSEAU, WILSON v. See Wilson «. Eousseau. 
 ROWAN V. KUNNEtS, 5 H. 138. 
 
 Slavery; validity of notes for pur- a 5 H. 141, Truly ». Wanzer. 
 chase of slaves imported into Missis- a 6 H. 5, Sims ». Hundley, 
 sippi after 1833 ; construction of the 6 7 H. 817, Nesmith v. Sheldon. 
 Mississippi constitution, a b 16 H. 432, L. Ins. Co. u.Debolt. 
 
 When U. S. courts are not bound 6 IS H. 595, Rease v. Peek, 
 by decisions of the State courts, b b 1 Wall. 393, Meyer j; Muscatine 
 
 b 100 U. S. 53, Fairfield « Gallatin 
 6 101 U. S. 686, Douglass v. Pike. 
 
 RUBBER CO. V. GOODYEAR, 6 WaU. 155. 
 
 Supreme Court ; supersedeas. 
 Pinal decrees, b 
 
 a 10 Wall. 289, Slaughter-House 
 Cases. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 99, French ». Shoe- 
 maker. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 149, Bigler v. Waller. 
 
 b 13 Wall. 56, Wheeler v. Harris. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 30, Jerome ». McCarter 
 
 a 93 U. S. 88, Kitchen i>. Eaii- 
 dolph. 
 
 RUBBER CO. T. GOODTEAB, 9 Wall. 788. 
 
 Parent View; fraud in reissue; 
 how question raised, a 
 Protits; infringement. 6 
 Bills of review, c 
 Cross-bills, d 
 
 a 11 Wall. 492, Eureka Co. ». Bai- 
 ley Co. 
 a 11 Wall. 543, Seymour »Osborne 
 a 12 Wall. 64, R.E. Co. ». Dubois 
 b 97 U. S. 139, Elizabeth v. Pave- 
 ment Co. 
 c 100 U. S. 107, Kicker v. Powell. 
 d 101 U. S. 641, R. R. Co. v. U. S. 
 
 RUBBER PENCrL CO. v. HOWARD, 80 WaU. 498. 
 
 Patent law ; " inventions." a , j a 92 U. S. 353, Eeckendorfer ». Pa- 
 
 I ber. 
 
 RUDEN, MABTTLAND INS. CO. T. See Maryland Ins. Co. v. Ruden. 
 
 RUGGI.es, PROUTY v. See Prouty v. Ruggles. 
 
 RUI.B, PARKER V. See Parker v. Rule. 
 
 RUMBALl, N. T. & TJX. S. S. CO. v. See Ne-wTOrk & Liv. S. S. Ob. U.Rnmbali. 
 
 RUNDIE V. DEL. & RARITAN CANAl, 14 H. SO. 
 
 U. S. courts ; jurisdiction ; cor- I a 16 H. 325, Marshall v. Bait. & 
 porations. a | Ohio R. R. 
 
 RUNNELS, HARRIS v. See Harris v. Runnels. 
 
 RUNNELS, ROWAN v. See Rowan v. Runnels. 
 
 RUNYON V. COSTER, 14 P. 188. 
 
 a 15 H. 400, MeDonough v. Miir- 
 
 Corporations ; rights in other 
 States, a 
 
 doch. 
 a 101 U. S. 354, Chris. Un. ».Yount 
 
 RUSH V. PARKER, 5 Cr. 887. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter | a 21 H. 392, Eichm'd v. Milwaukee 
 In dispute ; affidavits showing, a | a 6 Wall. 442, The Grace Girdler. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 255 
 
 BCSSEIX, EX PARTE, 13 WaU. 664. 
 
 Court of Claims; conclusiveness 
 of its jutlgmeuts. a 
 
 Supreme Court; at what time 
 tliey will hear motions to dismiss. 6 
 
 New trials in Court of Claims; 
 ettect on pending appeals, c 
 
 a 22 Wall. 647. U. S. u. O'Giady. 
 b 23 Wall. 2SS, Thomas v. Wool- 
 
 d ridge, 
 c 94 U. S. 259, U. S. v. Young, 
 b 94 U. S. 493, Clark v. Hancock, 
 c 95 U. S. 642, Young v. U. S. 
 
 BUSSEti, BEEBE v. See Beebe v. Russell. 
 BIJSSEII., CHRISTMAS v. See Oliristmas v. Eussell. 
 RUSSELL V. CliABK, 7 Cr. 69. 
 
 Guaranty ; letters of credit, a 
 Equity t)leading ; answer. 6 
 Parties, c 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship ; formal 
 parties will not gust jurisdiction, d 
 
 Equity ; remedy complete at law ; 
 dismissal by court of its own mo- 
 tion, e 
 
 a 7 P. 117, Douglass v. Eeynolds. 
 
 a 10 P. 491, Lee«. Dick. 
 
 6 10 P. 497, Brown v. Swann. 
 
 a 12 P. 212, Adams u. Jones. 
 
 a 1 H. 180, Bell v. Briien. 
 
 c S H. 409, West o. Smith. 
 
 f 17 H. 137, Shields v. Barrow. 
 
 d 18 H. 468, Wood v. DavH. 
 
 e 19 H. 276, Hipp v. Bahin. 
 
 c 16 Wall. 450, Kiboii v. Railroad. 
 
 . Russell. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 606, Russell v. Place. . 
 a 102 U. S. 130, Ball v. Langles. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 270, Swain v. Seamens. 
 6 16 Wall. 517, Tweed's Case, 
 c 17 Wall. 411, Reed v. Gardner. 
 
 BUSSEti, CliARKE v. See Clarke 
 BUSSEIil V. DODGE, 93 V. S. 460. 
 
 Patent law; specifications; re- 
 issue, a 
 
 BUSSELI. V. ELY, a Bl. 578. 
 
 Statute of frauds ; " interest in 
 land." a 
 Instructions to the jury. 6 
 Bills of exception, c 
 
 BUSSEIX, HALL, v. See Hall v. Eussell. 
 
 RUSSELL, HAMILTON v. See Hamilton ». Russell. 
 
 BUSSELL, KLEIN v. See Klein v. Russell. 
 
 BUSSELL, O'DOWD V. See O'Dowd d. Eussell. 
 
 EUSSELL V. SOUTHARD, 18 H. 139. 
 
 U. S. courts; equityjurisdietion. a a 13 H. 270, Neves u. Scott. 
 Mortgages; when transaction sale 6 16 H. 566, Soutliardu. Rnssell. 
 or mortgage; extrinsic ovidence. 6 6 19 H. 293, Babcock w. Wyman . 
 
 Supreme Court; will not consider c 1 Bl. 489, U. S. v. Knight, 
 any evidence except that in the b 12 Wall. 339, Villa v. Rodriguez. 
 record, c b 15 Wall. 110, Morgan v. Shinn. 
 
 6 96 U. S. 336. Peugh v. Davis. 
 b 97 U. S. 627, Howland v. Blake. 
 6 98 U. S. 516, Brick v. Brick. 
 
 RUSSELL, SOUTHARD v. See Southard v. Russell . 
 
 BUSSELL, U. S. V. See U. S. e. Eussell. 
 
 BUTHEEEOED v. FISHER, 4 Dall. 83. 
 
 Supreme Court; final decrees, a | 11 H. 23, U. S. v. Girault. 
 
 RUTHERFORD v. GEDDES, 4 Wall. 880. 
 
 Depositions; against whom they I a 10 Wall. 435, Tappan u Beardsley 
 can be read, a I 
 
256 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 BUTHEKFORD v. GKEEN, 2 Wh. 303. 
 
 Legislative power; statutes ought 
 not to be, construed so sis to divest 
 riglits of property, a 
 
 Land titles by act of Congress; 
 wlien legal title vests, b 
 
 BYAIf V. BENBLEY, 1 Wall. 66. 
 
 Supreme Court; amount In con- 
 troversy, a 
 
 U. S. courts; evidence; rule of 
 decision . 6 
 
 BTAir T. CABTEB, 93 V. S. TS. 
 
 Land grants; act of Congress 
 passes the title as well as a patent. 
 a 
 
 a 6 P. 733, U. S. v. Arredondo. 
 6 12 P. 294, Galloway v. Finlcy. 
 h 12 H. 72, Lessieur b. Price. 
 h 17 H. 552, Fremont v. U. S. 
 6 21 H. 278, Dicliens ». Mahana. 
 h 21 Wall. 60, Schulenberg v. 
 
 Harriman. 
 6 21 Wall. 531, Langdeau v Haiies 
 b 91 U. S. 333, Shipley w. Cowan. 
 6 101 U. S. 509, Hall v. Eussell. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 695, Thompson j;. But- 
 ler. 
 
 6 102 U. S. 165, Potter v. National 
 Bank. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 663, Tameling «. U. S. 
 
 Freehold Co. 
 a 95 U. S. 535, Morrow v. Whitney 
 a 98 U. S. 17, Palmer v. Low. 
 
 BTAN T. THOMAS, 4 WaU. 604. 
 
 Supreme Coiut ; writ of error to I a 9 Wall. 786, Carpenter ». Wil- 
 
 liams. 
 
 State court ; Federal question, a 
 SAC CO., CBOBTWELI, v. See Cromwell v. Sao Co. 
 SAC CO., SMITH V. See Smith v. Sao Co. 
 SAFFOBD, CABBOIil. v. See Carroll v. Safford. 
 SAGE V. CENTBAl B. B. CO., 93 U. S. 41!8. 
 
 Supersedeas, a , I a 94 U. S. 718, Memphis ». BrowQ. 
 
 I a 96 U. S. 712, Sage ». E. R. Co. 
 
 SAGE T. BADLBOAD, 96 U. S. 718. 
 
 Supreme Court; appeals; cita- I a 96 U. S. 738, Bank ». Omaha, 
 tion; supersedeas, a \ 
 
 SAIIOBS' SNUG HAKBOB, INGtlS v. See Inglls v. Sailors' Snug HarUor. 
 ST. CHABIES, BOGEBS v. See Rogers v. St. Charles. 
 ST. CLAIB V. tOVINGSTON, 18 WaU. 638. 
 
 Supreme Court; final decrees, a | a 20 Wall. 654, Parcels v. Johnson. 
 
 I a 91 U. S. 2, McComb u. Com'rs. 
 ST. CLAJCB CO., MII.I.S v. See Mills v. St. Clair Co. 
 ST. JAGO DE CUBA, THE, 9 Wi. 409. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; maritime 
 contracts, a 
 
 Master ; hypothecation of ship in 
 foreign port. 6 
 
 When claims against vessel are 
 super.acded by forfoitui'e. c 
 
 Innocent purchase without notice 
 of forfeiture, d. 
 
 a 5 H. 432, Waring «. Clark, 
 a 6 H. 378, St. Nav. Co. u. Bank. 
 6 19 H. 25, Thomas v. Osborn. 
 c 7 Wall. 159, The Siren. 
 6 10 Wall. 212, The Kalorama. 
 A 11 Wall. 368, The Distilled 
 
 Spirits. 
 6 13 Wall. 335, The Patapsco. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 257 
 
 ST. JOHN V. PAINE, 10 H. 557. 
 
 Collision ; sailing vessels and 
 steamboats, a 
 Rate of speed. 6 
 Lookouts, c 
 
 a 17 H. 153, Monticello v. MoUlson. 
 a 18 H. 224, The New York v. Rue. 
 a 18 H. 571, The Oregon v. Rocca. 
 6 19 H. 109, Rogers?; The St Char's 
 a 21 H. 385, S. S. Co. w. Rumball. 
 a 22 H. 472, Trans. Co. v. Nav. Co. 
 a 2 Wall. 545, The Ann Caroline, 
 c 3 Wall. 273, The Ottawa. 
 a 4 Wall. 511, Bentley v. Coyne. 
 a 9 Wall. 153, Tlie Johnson. 
 a 9 Wall. 422, The Fairbanks. 
 
 ST. JOSEPH'S TOWNSHIP v. B06EBS, 16 WaU. 644. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads ; conditions ; recitals ; bona- 
 fide holders ; estoppel, a 
 
 There must be legislative author- 
 ity ; election by " majority of legal 
 voters." 6 
 
 ST. LAWRENCE, THE, 1 Bl. 585. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; lien for 
 repairs, a 
 
 Waiver. 6 
 
 Limits to the admiralty jurisdic- 
 tion, c 
 
 What liens the States can create 
 and the U. S. courts will enforce, d 
 
 a 92 U. S. 492, Coloma v. Eaves. 
 a 92 U. S. 499, Venice v. Murdock. 
 a 94 U. S. 206, Com'rs v. January. 
 6 94 U. S. 262, S. Ottawa?). Perkins 
 a 94 U. S. 287, Com'rs v. Clark. 
 6 95 U. S. 369, Cass Co. v Johnston 
 
 a 2 Bl. 583, The Potomac. 
 
 6 5 Wall. 561, Bird of Paradise. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 641, The Belfast. 
 
 c 11 Wall. 24, Lis. Co. v, Dunham 
 
 d 11 Wall. 192, Leon v. Galceran. 
 
 d 13 Wall. 243, ex parte McNeil. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 304, Atkins v. Disnite- 
 
 grating Co. 
 d 20 Wall. 219, The Lotta wanna. 
 a 21 Wall. 575, Tlie Lotta wanna. 
 
 ST. LOUIS, CARONDELET v. See Carondelet v. St. Louis. 
 
 ST. LOTUS V. FERRT CO., 11 WaU. 423. 
 
 Constitution ; taxing power of | a 100 U. S. 497, Kirtland v. Hotch- 
 the States, a \ kiss. 
 
 ST. LOUIS PACKET CO. v. See Packet Co. u. St. Louis. 
 
 ST. LOUIS BANK, DECATUR BANK v. See Decatur Bank v. St, Louis Bank. 
 ST. LOUIS PUB. SCHOOLS, KISSELL v. See Kissell v. St. Louis Pub. Schools. 
 ST. NICHOLAS, THE, 1 Wli. 417. 
 
 Prize; fraudulent claim, a \ab Wli. 130, The Vonus. 
 
 Confi.icatioii therefor, b I 6 8 P. 496, Carrington v. Ins. Co. 
 
 ST. PAUL CO., MINNESOTA CO. v. See Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co. 
 SALAMANCA, WILSON v. See Wilson v. Salamanca. 
 SALAMON, STEWART v. See Stewart v. Salamon. 
 SALAMON V. U. S., 19 Wall. 17. 
 
 Court of Claims; jurisdiction ; i a 101 U. S. 549, R. R. Co. v. U. S. 
 implied contracts, a I 
 
 SALISBURY, EASTON v. See Easton v. Salisbury. 
 SALLY, THE, U. S. v. See U. S. o. The Sally. 
 SALLY, THE, 8 Cr. 384. 
 
 Prize; "enemy's property." a 
 Municipal forfeiture does not dis- 
 place law of prize, h 
 17 
 
 a 2 Bl. 674, Prize Cases. 
 
 b 5 Wall. 376, The Hampton. 
 
25S 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SAXMON TAllS CO. V. GODDAKD, 
 
 Statute of frauds ; memorandum 
 of afrreement. a 
 
 14 H. 446. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 292, Beckwith v. Talbot. 
 a 99 U. S. Ill, Grafton v. Cum- 
 mings. 
 
 SAiX CO. V. EAST SAGINAW, 13 WaU. 373. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; exemption from taxation ; 
 licenses, a 
 
 SALTMAKSH v. TUTHIM,, 18 H. 389. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 542, Welch v. Cools. 
 
 Supreme Court ; supersedeas. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 292, Slaugiiter-House 
 
 a 12 Wall. 100, French "v. Shoe- 
 maiker. 
 
 SAXXMABSH v. TUTHIXI., 13 H. 839. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; party to can- I a 1 Wall. 173, Sweeney v. Easter, 
 not discredit by his own teslimony.ct | 
 SAITONSTAM., STOKES v. See Stokes v. Saltonstall. 
 SAMPLE V. BAKNES, 14 H. 73. 
 
 Equity ; defense cannot be set up 
 which has been tried' at law. a 
 Laches. 6 
 
 SAMPSON V. PEASIiEB, 80 H. 574. 
 
 Duties; appraisement; parol evi- 
 dence, a 
 
 SAMPSON V. W^EiSH, 84 H. 807. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter 
 in dispute, a 
 
 SAMUEt, THE, 1 Wl. 9. 
 
 Admiralty; informations, a 
 Supreme Court ; reversals ; form 
 of. 6 
 Admiralty jurisdiction, c 
 
 a 94 U. S. 6.58, Grim v. Handley. 
 b 95 U. S. 161, Brown v. Buena 
 Vista. 
 
 a 24 H. 525, Belcher v. Linn. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty. 
 a 95 U. S. 696, Thompson v Butler 
 
 9 Wli. 399, The Merino. 
 
 4 H. 148, Garland v. D ivls. 
 
 6 H. 378, St. Nav. Co. v. Bank. 
 
 7 Wall. 638, The Belfast. 
 
 8 Wall. 26, The Eagle. 
 a 20 Wall. 110, Confiscation Cases. 
 
 SAN ANTONIO T. MAHEFFY, 96 U. S. 312. 
 
 a 99 U. 
 a 101 U. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads; recitals; estoppel; bona- 
 fide purchasers, a • 
 
 SANDERS, KBEtEY v. See Keeley 1). Sanders. 
 SANDERSON, PECK v. See Peclc v. Sanderson, 
 SANDPORD, SCOTT v. See Scott v. Sandford. ' 
 SANDFOBD, WILSON v. See Wilson v. Sandford. 
 SANDIPORD, TAYLOE v. See Tayloe v. Sandiford. 
 SANDUSKY V. NATIONAL BANK, 83 WaU. 893. 
 
 S. 682, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 S. 204, Pompton b Cooper 
 Union. 
 
 Bankruptcy; supervisory juris- a 03 U. S. 
 diction of Circuit Court ; not re- a 94 U. S 
 viewable by Supreme Court, a a 98 U. s". 
 SANGER, NEWHALL v. See NewHall v. Sanger. 
 SANGER V. UPTON, 91 U. S. 56. 
 
 348, Wiswall v Campbell 
 322, Hill V. Thompson. 
 369, Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. 
 
 Corporations ; stockholders : 
 paid subscriptions, a 
 
 a 01 U. S. 71, Webster v. Upton. 
 a 95 U. S.'G67, Chubb v. Upton. 
 a 96 U. S. 329, Pullman v. U])ton. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 259 
 
 SAN PEDRO, THE, 2 Wll. 141. 
 
 Supreme Courts appeals; juris- 
 diction; act of 1803. a 
 
 Citation, b 
 
 Equity cases reviewed by appeal ; 
 law cases by writ of error, c 
 
 SANTA MARIA, THE, 10 WU. 431. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 Mandate; interest; when given. 6 
 Second appeal, c 
 
 a 16 P. 452, Parish v. Ellis. 
 b 6 H. 88, Villabolas u. U. S. 
 c 12 Wall. 442, Walker v. Drevillc- 
 a 16 Wall. 342, Merrill v. Petty. 
 a 20 Wall. 622, Murdock«Memphis 
 
 a 3 P. -316, Canter e. Ins. Co. 
 6 9 P. 286, Boyce v. Grundy. 
 c 12 P. 491, ex paHe Sibbald. 
 c 3 H. 424, Bridge Co. v. Stewart. 
 c 6 H. 40, Bank U. S. v. Moss, 
 ■c 15 H. 464, Corning M.Iron Pac'y. 
 c 20 H. 480, Robertas;. Cooper, 
 c 12 Wall. 129, JsToonan v. Bradley, 
 c 96 U. S. 462, The Lady Pike. 
 
 SANTISSIMA TRINIDAD, THE, 7 Wlu 337. 
 
 War; recognition of belligeren- 
 cy, a 
 
 Claims against ship forfeited to 
 the government. 6 
 
 U. S.; civil war; belligerent and 
 sovereign rights, c 
 
 Captures in neutral waters, d 
 
 SAPPHIRE, THE, 11 Wall. 164. 
 
 Collision; watch, a 
 
 SARAH, THE, 8 Wll. 391. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; seizures 
 on land; trial by jury, a 
 
 Supreme Court; reversal where 
 court below was without jurisdic- 
 tion, b 
 
 a 2 Bl. 669, Prize Cases. 
 6 7 Wall. 161, The Siren, 
 c 11 Wall. 307, Miller v. U. S. 
 a 96 U. S. 190, Williams u.Bruffy 
 d 101 U. S. 42, The Florida. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 202, The Clara. 
 
 a 1 P. 549, U. S. V. Casks of Wine 
 a 6 Wall. 764, Un. Ins. Co. «. U.S. 
 a 7 Wall. 462, Confiscation Cases. 
 a 8 Wall. 26, The Eagle. 
 a 10 Wall. .543, ex parte Graham . 
 a 16 Wall. 165, Garnharts v. U. S. 
 b 23 Wall. 1G4, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 a 99 U. S. 374, U. S.w. Winchester. 
 
 SARAH ANNE, THE, NEW ENGLAND INS. CO. v. See.New England Ins. 
 Co. «. The Sarah Anne. 
 
 SATTERtEE v. BtATTHEWSON, 8 P. 
 
 Retrospective and curative legis- 
 lation, a 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to 
 State courts; Federal question b 
 
 380. 
 
 a ,8P, 
 6 10P, 
 all P, 
 
 108, Wiitson V. Mercer. 
 
 391, Crowell v. Randell. 
 
 536, Charles Riv. Bridge v. 
 Warren Bridge. 
 a 10 H. 396, R. R. Co.u. Nesbit. 
 a 10 H. 532, E. Hart. d. Hart. 3r. 
 a I Wall. 204, GelpcUq v. Dubuque 
 a 7 Wall. 624, Beloit v. Morgan. 
 a 8 Wall. 602, Drehman v. Stifle. 
 a 23 Wall. 147, Randell u.Kreiger. 
 
 SAUERWEIN, BKAUN v. See Braun v. Sauerwein. 
 SATILET v. SHEPHERD, 4 WaU. 507. 
 
 Trial without jury; findings of 
 facts ; review of. a 
 Alluvion, b 
 
 a 15 Wall. 438, Richmond «. Smith 
 a 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 6 23 Wall. 68, St.Clairw.Lov'ston. 
 
260 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SAHNDBBS V. GOUtD, 4 P. 398. 
 
 Certificates of division, a | a 7 H. 190, U. S. ». Chicago. 
 
 I a 2 Bl. 435, Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 
 SAtTNDEBS, OGDEN v. See Ogden d. Saunders. 
 SAUVBNET, WAI-KEK v. See Walker o. Sanvenet. 
 SAVAGE, TATIiOR v. See Taylor v. Sayage. 
 SAVIEGO, McKINNET T. See McKinney v. Sarlego. 
 SATTGNAC T. GARRISON, 18 H. 136. 
 
 Missouri titles ; lots in St. Louis.a | a 10 Wall. 116, Schools ». Kisley, 
 SAVINGS BANK T. COIiLECTOB. See Bank for SaTings «. Odllector. 
 SAVINGS BANK, CONCORD v. See Conoord v. Sayings Bank. 
 SAVINGS BANK, MOULTRIE v. See Monltrie d. Savings Bank. 
 SAVINGS INST., TEATMAN v. See Yeatman v. Sayings Inst. 
 SAWTEB V. HOAG, 17 WaU. 610. 
 
 Corporations ; capital stock; 
 trnst fund for creditors, a 
 
 a 91 U. S. 48, Upton v. Trebilcock 
 a 92 U. S. 366, Soammon v. Kim- 
 ball. 
 
 SATTTTER y. TURPIN, 91 U. S. 114. 
 
 Bankruptcy; preferences, a | a 101 U. S. 743, Stewart v. Piatt. 
 SATBB, GREGG v. See Gregg i). Sayre. 
 SCALES, McGOON y. See MoGoon u. Scales. 
 
 SCHAEEBR, LIBB INS. CO. y. See Oonn. Mut. Life Ins. Go. v. Schaefer. 
 SCHALL, EOSDICK y. See Fosdick i). Schall. 
 SCHEIMER, HOOPER y. See Hooper v. Scheimer. 
 SCHENCK, SUPERVISORS y. See Superyisors v. Schenok. 
 SCHIMMELPENNICH y. BAYARD, 1 P. 884. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; acceptance, a | a 4 P. 118, Boyce v. Henry. 
 SCHMEIDER, BARNEY V. See Barney v. Schmeider. 
 SCHOLEY y. RBW, 83 WaU. 331. 
 
 Constitution ; " direct taxes ; " I a 102 TT. 8. 601, Springer v. U. S. 
 succession tax. a \ 
 
 SCHOOLS, THB, y. RISLEY, lO WaU. 115. 
 
 Instructions to jury, a I a 16 Wall. 517, Tweed's Case. 
 
 Alluvion. 6 | 6 23 Wall. 68, St.Clairc.Lov'ston. 
 
 SCHOOL DEBBCTORS, HEPBURN y. See Hepburn v. School Directors. 
 SCHUCHARDT y. ALI.EN, 1 WaU. 359. 
 
 Instructions ; province of the 
 jury to pass on evidence, a 
 
 Refusing new trial not assign- 
 able for error. 6 
 
 When the court is bound to sub- 
 mit a case to the jury, t 
 
 o 9 Wall. 202, Hickman v. Jones. 
 6 13 Wall. 604, Ins. Co. ». Barton. 
 c 14 Wall. 448, Imp. Co.»Munsoii 
 6 IS Wall. 251, Ins. Co. v. Folsoin 
 c 22 Wall. 121, Pleasants v. Fant. 
 c 91 U. S. 365, Arthur v. Cura- 
 
 ming. 
 6 93 U. S. 301, E. R. Co. v. Horst. 
 c 94 U. S. 285, Comm'rs v. Clark, 
 c 100 U. S. 27, K. B. Co. v. Fraloff 
 6 102 U. S. 120, R.R. Co.«. Heck. 
 
 SCHUCHARDT y. THE ANGELIQUE, 19 H. 841. 
 
 Admiralty; sale of the res; sur- | a 20 Wall. 223, The Lottawanna. 
 plus; distribution, a | a 21 Wall. 582, The Lottawanna. 
 
MANUAL OP SGPEEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 261 
 
 SCHXTLBNTBEBG v. HAKRIMAN, 81 
 
 Grants by Congi-ess to the States 
 for railroad purposes; conveyances 
 to the companies, a 
 
 When title vests ill the State. 6 
 
 Statutes ; words must receive 
 their usual meaning, c 
 
 Grants on conditions subsequent ; 
 office found, d 
 
 Wall. 44. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 65, Farnsworth » Min. 
 
 & Pile. R. R. 
 & 92U. S. 741, Leav.R.R.w. U.S. 
 c 93 U. S. 638, Heydenfeldt ». 
 
 Daiiev Gold Co. 
 d 97 U. S. 218, McMickeii u. U. S. 
 b 97 U. S. 496, Mo., &b., R. R. Co. 
 
 u.Pac. R.R.Co. 
 6 99 U. S. 475, R. R. Co. v Ailing. 
 6 101 U. S. 503, Hall c. Russell. 
 
 SCHUKMIER, BAJXROAD v. See Railroad v. Sohnrmier. 
 SCHtJTTE, BAJXROAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Setiutte. 
 SCHXTTLEB CO. V. THOMAS, 98 U. S. 169. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 
 a 100 U. S. 592, Cass Co. v. Gillett. 
 a 1 01 D. S. 203, Pompton v. Union 
 
 aid of railroads; coiulltions; elec- 
 tions ; recitals ; bona-flde holders, a 
 
 SCOTIA, THE, 14 Wall. 170. 
 
 Collision ; sailing vessels, and I a 91 U. S. 204, The Free State. 
 steamers, a | 
 
 SCOTtAND CO. V. THOMAS, 94 V. S. 687. 
 
 Municipal and county bonds in 
 aid of railroads ; effect of consoli- 
 dation on subscription, a 
 
 Election by two-thirds of the 
 lawful voters, b 
 
 Effect of adoption of new consti- 
 tution on subscriptions, c 
 
 SCOTT T. JOITES, 5 H. 343. 
 
 Writ of error to State court; Fed- 
 eral question, a 
 
 SCOTT, ilOTD V. See Lloyd v. Scott. 
 SCOTT V. 1,1-OirD, 12 P. 149. 
 
 Jury ; evidence ; competency ; 
 release of witness, a 
 Suffleii.'ncy of evidence. 6 
 
 a 94 U. S. 806, East Lincoln v. 
 
 Davenport 
 6 95 U. S. 624, Henry v. Nicholay 
 c 96 U. S. 685, Ray v. Missouri, 
 c 98 U. S. 173, Schuyler u Thomas 
 c 99 U. S. 220, Sup'rs v. Galbraith 
 b 99 U. S. 504, Wilson v. Sala- 
 manca. 
 a 101 U. S. 91, Empire v Darling- 
 ton. 
 a 101 U. S. 202, Pompton C.Union. 
 a 102 U. S. 95, Menasha u Hazard. 
 
 a 12 H. 4, Miner's Bank v. Iowa. 
 a 10 Wall. 510, Messenger v. Mason 
 
 a 13 P. 217. Stein ». Bowman. 
 6 3H. 71, Walker v. Bank, 
 as 4H. 413, Smythe u. Strader. 
 a 5H. 94, Bridges B. Armor. 
 
 SCOTT V. lUNT, 6 P. 349. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter j a 17 H. 21, Olney ». The Falcon, 
 in conti'oversy. a I 
 
 SCOTT, NEVES V. Neves v. Scott. 
 ;SCOTT T. EATI/UTE, 6 P. 86. 
 
 Land titles; effect of patent in- ] a 14 Wall. 143, Armstrong wMorrQl 
 eluding a prior claim, a I 
 
 SCOTT V. SANDFORD, 19 H. 393. 
 
 Jurisdiction; consent cannot I a 16 WaU. 346, Merrill ». Petty, 
 give, a I 
 
•2G2 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SCULL V. U. S., 98 U. S. 410. 
 
 Loiiiniiina ; imperfect French and 
 Spanish grants; act of 1860. a 
 
 a 101 rj. S. 706. D'Auterive«.U. S- 
 a 101 U. S. 825, U. S. v. Claymoi'- 
 gan. 
 
 SEA, INS. CO. V. see Ins. Co. v. Sea. 
 SEABUKT, ITELK- v. See Field v. Seabnry. 
 SEA I/ION, THE, 5 "WaU. 648. 
 
 The civil \vai-; ooramercial in- I a 6 Wall. 5S1, Ouachita Cotton, 
 tercom-se ; license to trade, a \ a 7 Wall. 55&, Coppell i>. Hall. 
 
 SEAMAN, U. S. V. See tJ. S. v. Seaman. 
 
 SEAMANS, SWAIN v. See Swain u. Seamans. 
 
 SEARIGHT V. STOKES, 3 H. 151. 
 
 Postmaster-General; powers over 
 
 a 3 H. 740, Neil v. Ohio. 
 
 b 1-2 H. 296, Achison i;. Haddleston 
 
 the mnil. a 
 
 Postal compact between the U. 
 S. and the States. & 
 SEABS, FENWICK v. SeeFenwioki). Sears. 
 SEAVER TT. BIGEX.OWS, 5 Wall. 208. 
 
 Supreme Court; value of matter i a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty, 
 in dispute, a \ o 100 U. S. 148, Pav'gCo. v Mulford 
 
 SEA W^IXCH, 6 'WaU. 848. 
 
 Blockade; capture for violating, a | a 7 Wall. 360,. The Diana. 
 
 SECOMBE, EX PAKTB, 19 H. 9. 
 
 Mandamus to restore attorney ; a 4 Wall. 379, ex parte Garland, 
 power of courts over attorneys, a al Wall. 377, ex parte Bradley. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 535, Randall v. Brighara. 
 
 SECOMBE V. STEELE, 80 H. lOO. 
 
 Equity ; specific performance ; I a 20 H. 463, Stinson ». Dousman. 
 time; whenof essence of contract, a \ 
 
 SECRETAKT T. McGARKAHAN, 9 WaU. 305. 
 
 U. S. courts ; mandamus against : a 9 Wall. 577, Litchfield rKegister 
 officers, a o 13 Wall. 249, Bath Co. v. Amy. 
 
 ! a 17 Wall. 609, U. S. v. Boutwetl. 
 a 19 Wall. 660, Heine u. Levee Com. 
 a 93 U. S. 173, French v. Fyan. 
 'a 101 U. S. 475, Marauez v. Frisbie. 
 
 SECBIST V. GREEN, 3 WaU. 749. 
 
 State laws; judicial notice, a j a 8 Wall. 531, Carpenter u Dexter 
 
 Acknowledgments of deeds, b I 6 10 Wall. 32, Little v. Herndon. 
 SEDGWICK, PHIPPS v. See Phipps v. Sedgwiolc. 
 SEDGWICK, W^HF.ET.ER v. See Wheeler v. Sedgwick. 
 SEGTJI, U. S. V. See U. S. ii. Seffui. 
 SEIiDEN, MERCER v. -See Mercer ». Selden. 
 SELDEN, SHEETS v. See Sheets v. Selden. 
 SELMA & M. R. R. CO. v. LOUISIANA NATIONAL BANK, 94 U. S. 858. 
 
 Supreme Court ; docketing tran- I a 102 U. S. 576, Edwards v. U. S. 
 script, a \ 
 
 SEMMES V. HARTFORD INS. CO., 13 WaU. 169. 
 
 Limitations ; suspension during I a 15 Wall. 184, Brown v. Hiatts. 
 the civil war. a | a 22 Wall. 587, Eoss v. Jones. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 263 
 
 SEMMES V. U. S., 91 U. S. 81. 
 
 Amnesty and pardon ; coiiflsca- a 92 U. S. 214, Wallacli v. V.in Ris - 
 tlon. a wick. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 140, Biirbank». Semuics 
 
 S£K£ T. PITOT, 6 Cr. 333. 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship; as- I a 9 Wall. 393, Biishnell w Kenned)' 
 signees; sec. 11 judiciary act. a | a99U. S. 400, Smitli v. R. R. Co. 
 
 SERBANO V. U. S., 5 WaU. 461. 
 
 California; Mexican land titles; | a 92 U. S. 476, Miller «. Dale, 
 •'equities'' again.st the U. S. a, | 
 SESSIONS V. JOHNSON, 95 U. S. 347. 
 
 Joint contract; judgment, a | a 99 U. S. 45, U. S. v. Ames. 
 SETON, MECHANICS' BANK v. See Mechanics' Bank u. Seton. 
 SEXON, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Seton. 
 
 SEVIER T. HASKEI.E, 14 Wall. 18. 
 
 Snpreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court; Federal question, a 
 
 a 14 Wall. 666, Delmas». Ins. Co. 
 a 93 U. S. 121, H. Ins.Co. v. Citv. 
 a 102 U. S. 418, Daniels u Tearney 
 
 SETTING MACHINE CO. CASE, 18 Wall. 563. 
 
 Removals ; act of 1867. a 
 
 SEXTON v. WHEATON, 8 W^h. 848 
 
 YoUmtary and fraudulent con- 
 veyances, a 
 Creditors' bills. 6 
 
 a 21 WaU. 43, Vannevar v. Bryant. 
 
 \ 
 
 SEXTON, WHEATON v, 
 
 SETBEKT T. PITTSBITBG, 1 Wall. S 
 
 Municipal subscriptions in aid of 
 railroads; power to issue negotia- 
 ble bonds, a 
 
 SETMOUR V. FREER, 6 WaU. 888. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeal bond, a 
 
 a 11 Wh. 199, Hindeu. Longvvorth. 
 a 12 P. 178. Clarke v. White, 
 a 7 H. 227, McLaughlin u. Bank- 
 et 13 H. 97, Parish v. Murphree. 
 a 6 Wall. 313, Clements v. Mooi-e. 
 a 8 Wall. 372, Mattinglv v. Nj'e. 
 a 20 Wall. 3">, Kehr v. Smil li. 
 a 91 U. S. 125, Jackson v. .lackson. 
 a 92 U. S. 183, Smith v. Vodges. 
 6 99 U. S. 401, Smith v. R.R. Co. 
 alOlU. S. 227, Jones v. Clifton. 
 al02U. S. 153, Graham u R.R. Co. 
 See Wieaton v. Sexton. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 666, Rogers v Burlington 
 
 a 7 Wall. 311, Edmonson v. Bloom- 
 shire. 
 
 SEYMOUR V. OSBORNE, 11 W^aU. 555. 
 
 Patent law; infringement; 
 "equivalents." a 
 
 "Original inventor." 6 
 
 Reissues; authority of tho Com- 
 missioner of Patents, c 
 
 Specifications, d 
 
 '•Prior invention," defense of. e 
 
 Combinations, f 
 
 a 15 Wall. 193, Gould u. Ree.s. 
 
 6 19 Wall. 390, Mitchell «Tighlman 
 
 a 22 Wall. 31, Gill v. Wells. 
 
 c 93 U. S. 464, Russell v. Dodge. 
 
 c 94 U. S. 226, Cammeyer v. New- 
 ton. 
 
 d 94 U. S. 288, Fuller v. Yentzer. 
 
 e 95 U. S. 215, Roemeru. Simon. 
 
 e 97 U. S. 352, Marsh w. Seymour. 
 
 / 98 U. S. 39, Bates v. Coe. 
 
 c 98 U. S. 139, Powder Co. v Pow- 
 der Ci). 
 
 c 102 U. S. 130, Ball v. Langles. 
 
264 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKBMB COtTET DECISIONS. 
 
 SETMOUK T. McCOBMICK, 16 H. 485. 
 
 Patent law ; infringement ; prof- 
 its; damages, a 
 
 Bloom- 
 
 a 23 H. 311, Edmonson v. 
 
 shire. 
 a 14 Wall. 650, Movvry v. Wiiitney, 
 a 19 Wall. 617, Pack.Co. v. Sickles. 
 o93U. S. 70, Birdsall J). Cooli(^e 
 
 SHACKEB v. HAKTFORD FIRE INS. CO., 93 V. S. 241. 
 
 Supreme Court ; value of matter I o 97 U. S. 565, Gray v. Blanchard. 
 in dispute, a I 
 
 SHANK.LIN V. WASHINGTON, 6 P. 390. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error ; 
 agreed case, a 
 
 SHANKS T. DTJPONT, 3 P. 348. 
 
 Alienage ; change of allegiance ; 
 domioil. a 
 
 War ; when conquest of territory 
 becomes complete, b 
 
 Treaties; construction, c 
 
 SHANNON, BBOWN v. See Brown v. Shannon. 
 SHABP, WEBB V. See Webb ■». Sharp. 
 SHATTtfCK, MALEY v. See Maley u. Shattuck. 
 SHAW V. COOPEB, 7 P. 313. 
 
 ^ Patents ; public use. a 
 Corrected and reissued patent 
 Abandonment, c 
 
 a 16 P. 296, U, S. v. Eliason. 
 
 a 20 H. 434, Suydam v. Williamson. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 437, Bichmond » Smith. 
 
 a 20 H. 17, Jones v. McMasters. 
 b 16 Wall. 434, U. S. u. Huckabee. 
 c 100 U. S. 487, Hauenstein»Lyn- 
 ham. 
 
 a 97 U. S, 
 clOlU. S 
 
 SHAW, CtTLBEBTSON T. Sec Calbertson v. Shaw. 
 
 SHAWHAN T. WHEBBITT, 7 H. 643. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; act 1841 ; proceed- 
 ings under; cannot be impeached 
 collaterally, a 
 
 Fraudulent preferences. 6. 
 SHEBOTGAN, OILMAN v. See Oilman v. Sheboygan, 
 SHBEHY M. MANDEEVII,I,E, 6 Cr. 353. 
 
 a 1 H. 204, McClurg v. Kingsland. 
 
 b 17 H. SO, Battin v. Taggert. 
 
 c 21 H. 329, Kendall v. Winsor. 
 
 6 2 Wall. 604, Read v. Bowman. 
 134, ElizabPth v Pav. Co 
 484, Mach. Co. v. Keith. 
 
 a 20 H. 113, Com. Bank u Buckner. 
 b 16 Wall. 307, Buchanan u. Smith. 
 a 21 Wall. 428. Michaels v. Post. 
 a 91 U. S. 661, Lamp v. Brass Co. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; joint notes ; 
 pleading, a 
 
 Note for pre-existing debt; dis- 
 charge of original cause of action, b 
 SHEEtET, SMITH v. See Smith v. Sheeley. 
 SHEETS V. SEIiDEN, 7 WaU. 480. 
 
 Landlord ; right to re-enter ; re- 
 lief in equity against forfeiture, a 
 
 SHELBY V. GUY, 11 Wh. 361. 
 
 U. S. courts ; decisions of State 
 courts ; when rules of decision, a 
 
 Limitations ; governed by law of 
 the forum. 6 
 
 "Beyond seas." c 
 
 a 8 Cr. 33, Van Ness v. Forrest. 
 6 12 P. 48, Bank of U. S. v. Daniel. 
 6 6 Wall. 236, Mason v. Eldred. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 477, Prout ». Roby. 
 
 o 6 P. 292, Green v. Neal. 
 a 4 H. 51, Beals v. Hale, 
 a 7 H. 215, Smiths). Kernochan. 
 6 9 H. 413, Townsendc. Jemisou. 
 a 14 H. 496, Webster u. Cooper. 
 a 2 Bl. 603, Leffingwell u.Warren. 
 a 4 Wall. 203, Christy u.Pridgeori 
 a 6 Wall. 640, Hamilton Co v Mass 
 c 97 U. S. 637, Davie v. Briggs. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 265 
 
 SHEtDON, CLIFTON v. See Clilton v. Sheldon. 
 SHEXDON, HOYT v. SeeHoyfo. Sheldon. 
 SHELDON, NESMITH v. See Nesmith 1I. Sheldon, 
 SHELDON T. SILL, 8 H. 441. 
 
 U. S. courts; sec. 11 judiciary 
 act ; assignees, a 
 
 Supreme Court; appellate juris- 
 diction. 6 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdictional facts 
 must be averred, c 
 
 SHEPHERD, COV. BRIDGE CO 
 
 SHEPHERD, SAULET v. See Saulet v. Shepherd. 
 
 SHEPLEY V. COWAN, 91 IT. S. 340. 
 
 Public lauds; jurisdiction of the 
 land officers, a 
 
 Wlien a person is regarded as the 
 eijuitable owner. 6 
 
 a IG H. 6.W, Deohler v. Dodge. 
 a 21 H. 576, White v. Vt. & Mass. 
 
 R.E. Co. 
 6 3 Wall. 254, Daniels v. R. R. Co. 
 c 9 Wall. 575, Assessor v. Osborn. 
 c 18 Wall. 577, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 a 93 U. S. 205, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 See Gov. Drawbridge Co. v. Shepherd. 
 
 SHEPPARD V. GRAVES, 14 H. 
 
 Pleading; abatement, a 
 
 a 96 U. S. 535, Moore v. Robbins. 
 6 98 U. S. 121, Wirth v. Branson. 
 a 100 0. S. 118, Lansdalew Daniels 
 a 101 U. S. 475, Marquez v. Frisbie 
 a 101 U. S. 519, Vance v. Burbank. 
 
 SHEPPARD T. TATLOR, 6 P. 676. 
 
 Writs of error; value of matter 
 in dispute, a 
 
 Commissions ; awards. 6 
 
 Admiralty appeals; lien attaches 
 to proceeds, c 
 
 Title to such proceeds, d 
 
 SHEPPARD V. WILSON, 6 H. 811. 
 
 Writs of error to territorial courts; 
 effect of admission as a State, a 
 
 SHEPPARD V. WILSON, 6 H. 875. 
 
 Bills of exceptions ; when excep- 
 tion must be talcen. a 
 SHERERD, CROXALL v. See Croxall v. Shererd. 
 SHERLOCK V. ALLING, 93 U. S. 103. 
 
 a 20 H. 265, Spenser v. Lapsley. 
 a S Wall. 423, Do Sobry v jSTlchol- 
 son. 
 
 a 6 P. 143, Oliver v. Alexander. 
 b 14 P. 95, Frevall v. Bache. 
 c 7 H. 730, Cutler v. Rae. 
 d 20 Wall. 221, The Lottawanna. 
 
 a en. 273, Sheppard v. Wilson. 
 
 a 15 H. 160. Phelps v. Mayer. 
 
 a 20 H. 439, Suydam v. Williamson 
 
 o 95 U. S. 487, Hall v. De Cuir. 
 
 Constitution ; regnlation of com- 
 merce, a 
 
 SHERMAN V. BUICK, 93 U. S. 809. 
 
 Grants to the States of sees. 16 
 and 30; indemnity lauds, a 
 
 When title vests. 6 
 
 California; act of 1853 for the 
 survey and sale of public lands, c 
 
 SHERMAN V. SMITH, 1 Bl. 587. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- i a 13 Wall. 216, Penn. College Cases 
 tracts, a \ 
 
 SHERRY V. McKINLEY, 99 V. S. 496. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 563, Huff v. Doyle. 
 & 96 U. S. 167, Water Co vBugbey 
 c 96 U. S. 175, Ferguson v. Mc- 
 Laughlin, 
 c 102 U. S. 173, Min.Co. wMin. Co. 
 
 Constitution ; ' 
 law;" warrants 
 debtors, a 
 
 due process of 
 against public 
 
 a 102 U. S. 594, Springer v. U. S. 
 
266 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SHEBKT, MZLI^EB v. See Miller n. Sherry. 
 
 SHERWOOD, GEN. MTJT. INS. CO.' v. See Gen. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sherwood. 
 
 SHIELDS V. BABBOW, 17 H. 137. 
 
 Cross-bills, a 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; neces- 
 sary parties; when objection to 
 want of parties may be taken. 6 
 
 Supreme Court; reversals for 
 want of proper parties, c 
 
 17 H. 592, Ayres v. Carver. 
 
 19 H. 114, Coiron v. Millaudoii, 
 6 Wall. 284, Barney v. Baltim. 
 
 11 Wall. 631, Bank v. Car. E.R. 
 
 14 Wall. 80, Christmas v. Ens- 
 sell. 
 6 16 Wall. 4-50, Ribon v. E. E. Co. 
 6 17 Wall. 579, Horn v. Lockhart. 
 b 18 Wall. 475, R. E. Co. v. On: 
 a 91 U. S. 385, The Dove, 
 b 93 U. S. 204, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 6 97 U. S. 424, Kendig «. Dean. 
 c 102 U. S. 563, Goodman ». isTib- 
 
 SHIEI,DS V. OHIO, 95 U. S. 781. 
 
 Constitution; legislative control I a 99 U. S. 721, Sinking Fund Cases 
 ovpi' charters, a I 
 
 SHIELDS T. THOMAS, 17 H. 4. 
 
 Supreme Court ; amount in con- l a 18 H. 255, Shields v. Thomas, 
 troversy. a \ 
 
 SHIPP v. MTLIEB, 8 Wi. 383. 
 
 Lands; surveys in Kentucky, a 
 Time within which made, b 
 U. S. courts; decisions of State 
 courts ; when rules of property, c 
 
 SHIBBAS V. CAIG, 7 Cr. 34. 
 
 Deed; what property passes, a 
 
 Purchase of equita,ble title, b 
 
 Mortgage for future advances; 
 constiuotion ; parol evidence, c 
 SHOEMAKEB, EEENCH v. See French v. Shoemaker. 
 SHORE, JONES V. See Jones v. Shore. 
 SHOBES, MACON CO. V. See Macon Co. v. Shores. 
 SHOBT STAPLE, THE, V. S. v. See U. S. •■,. The Short Staple. 
 SHEIVBB V. LYNN, 2 H. 59. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a a 8 H. 531, Williamson v. Berry. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 641, Minn, v St. Paul Co 
 a 18 Wall. 467, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 SHUTTE T. THOMPSON, 15 Wall. 151. 
 
 a 5 P. 487, Peyton v. Stith. 
 6 6 P. 62, Miller v, M'Intire. 
 c 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 c 4 H. 379, Poxcroft v. Mallett. 
 
 a 6 P. 740, U. S. v. Arredondo. 
 6 10 P. 212, Boon o. Chiles. 
 c 23 H. 26, Lawrence v. Tucker. 
 e 101 U. S. 631, Jones v. Guar. Co. 
 
 Supreme Court ; error ; objection 
 must first be taken in court below, a 
 Depositions ; objections to. 6 
 
 SIBBALD, EX PABTE, 18 P. 498. 
 
 Decrees; conclusiveness, a 
 Supreme Court ; power to review 
 its own decisions. 6 
 Execution of mandate, c 
 Power of a court over its judg- 
 ments, d 
 Second appeals, e 
 
 a 20 Wall. 418, Mays v. Fritton. 
 6 21 Wall. 35, Doane v. Glenn. 
 
 a 1 H. 147, Bank of U. S. v. Bevely 
 6 3 H. 424, Bridge Co. v. Stewart. 
 c 3 H. 618, Chaires v. U. S. 
 d an. 36, Bank of U. S. v. Sims. 
 6 15 H. 464, Corning u. Iron Fact'y 
 c 16 H. 102, Sizer v. Many. 
 6 20 H. 480, Eoberts v. Cooper, 
 c 1 Wall. 73, ex parte Dubuguc. 
 c 12 Wall. 129, Noonan v. Bradley. 
 a 17 Wall. 283, Tyler «. Magwire. 
 e 96 U. S. 462, The Lady Pike. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 267 
 
 SrBBAU), U. S. V. See U. S. v. Sibbald. 
 
 SICKI.es, wash, packet CO. V. See ■Washington Paolret Co. v. Sickles. 
 
 SIBYl, THE, 4 WU. 98. 
 
 Salvage ; amount will not be I a 11 H. 525, Spear v. Place, 
 changed on appeal unless maui- j 
 festly wrong. . a I 
 
 SICAKD V. DATIS, 6 P. 134. 
 
 Deeds ; recording, a | a 14 H. 260. De Lane v. Moore. 
 
 SICKLES, PACKET CO. v. See Packet Co. v. Sickles. 
 SIEBOIiD, EX PABTE, 100 V. S. STl. 
 
 Constitution; power of Congress I a 100 U. S. 400, ex parte Clarke. 
 over elections, a \ 
 
 SIGEKSON, HUNGEKFOBJB v. See Hungerford v. Sigerson. 
 SIGEBSON V. MATHEWS, 80 H. 496. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; indorsor; want 1 a 13 Wall. 13, Yeager v. Farwell. 
 oi notice, a \ 
 
 SIGI.EB V. HAYWOOD, 8 Wh. 675. 
 
 Administrators; plene adminis- I a 93 U. S. 42, Smitli v. Ciiapman. 
 travit. a \ 
 
 SlliX, SHEtDON V. See Sheldon v. Sill. 
 SIIXI»LAN V. HCDSON KIVBK BRIDGE CO., 1 Bl. 588. 
 
 Supreme Court ; divided court, a | a 10 Wall. 483, Hannauer v. Wood- 
 
 ruff. 
 
 SILLmAN, M'CLUNG v. 
 SILSBEE, BABBEDA v. 
 SII.SBT V. EOOTE, 14 H. 
 
 Nonsuit, a 
 
 Patent act; "notice o£ special 
 matter." 6 
 
 Error; matter of discretion not 
 reviewable, c 
 
 SILSBY V. FOOTB, aO H. 894. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 
 Courts may estimate damages 
 witiiout sending case to master. 6 
 
 Supersedeas, c 
 
 Patent law; infringement dam- 
 ages; profits; interest, d 
 
 SILTEB T. liADD, 7 WaU. 819. 
 
 Land ofiice; wlien jurisdiction 
 exclusive, a 
 
 SIMMS V. GUTHEIE, 9 Cr. 19. 
 
 Equity ; parties, a 
 
 Proofs and allegations must 
 agree. 6 
 
 U. S. courts ; citizenship ; ancil- 
 lary suits, c 
 
 SIMMS V. SLACUM, 3 Cr. 300. 
 
 Imprisonment for debt; fraudu- 
 lent discharge, a 
 
 See M'Olung v. Silliman. 
 See Barreda v. Silsbee. 
 888. 
 
 a 23 H. 183, Castle v. BuUard. 
 6 S Wall. 428, Blanchard v. Put- 
 nam, 
 c 11 Wall. 676, Cook v. Burnley. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 56, Wheeler «. Harris. 
 b 14 Wall. 201, The Merrimac. 
 c 19 Wall. 665, Board of Comm'rs 
 
 V. Gorman. 
 a 93 U. S. 285, Yznagai; Harrison 
 d 102 U. S. 106, Parks v. Booth. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 87, Johnson v. Towsley. 
 
 a 6 Wh. 557, Kerr v. Watts. 
 a 1 P. 243, Findlayi). Hinde. 
 b 1 Bl. 518, Foster v. Goddard. 
 c 10 Wall. 333, Jones v. Andrews, 
 c 14 Wall. 81, Christmas iJ.Bussell 
 
 a 1 Wh. 457, Ammidon v. Smith. 
 
268 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SIMMS, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Simms. 
 SIMON, BOEMEB v. See Eoemer v. Simon. . 
 SIMOKDS, GOODMAN T. See Goodman v. Simonds. 
 SIMONTON V. WINTER, 6 P. 141. 
 
 Verdicts; setting aside ; bad | a 4 H, 143, Garland v. Davis, 
 plea, a I 
 
 SIMPSON, BEY V. See Key v. Simpson. 
 SIMPSON T. WIXSON, 4 H. 709. 
 
 Patents ; renewals to exeeutoi'. a | a 9 H. 120, Wilson v. Simpsou. 
 SIMS, CKEATH V. See Creath v. Sims. 
 SIMS v. HUNDI-ET, 6 H. 1. 
 
 U.S. courts; want of proper citi- a 
 
 zcnshlp ; pleas in abatement, a a 
 
 Error ; mattei's discretionarj^ not 6 
 
 assig;nable for error, b c 
 
 ,U. S. conrts; evidence; rule in c 
 
 State court followed as a. rule of c 
 decision, c 
 
 SIMS, IBVINE T. See Irvine v. Sims. 
 SINGER, IJ. S. V. See U. S. v. Singer. 
 SINNOT V. DAVENPORT, 88 H. 338. 
 
 Constitution ; tonnage tax. a 
 Regulation of commerce. 6 
 
 7 H. 21.5, Smith v. Kernoclien.. 
 14 H. 508, Sheppard v. Graves. 
 20 H. 265, Spenser v. Lapsley. 
 
 1 Bl. 428, Vance v. Campbell. 
 
 2 Bl. 538, Wright v. Bates. 
 102 U. S. 165, Potters Nat. Bank 
 
 SIBEN, THE, 7 WaU. 158. 
 
 U, 8. ; liability for salvage. 
 Suits against U. S. 6 
 Prize, c 
 Liens against State property. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 214, St. Ton. Tax Cases. 
 b 93 U. S. 102, Sherlock v. Ailing. 
 6 99 U. S. 283, Tr. Co. B.Wheeling. 
 
 d 
 
 a 10 Wall. 18, The Davis. 
 
 6 11 Wall. 201, Case v. Terrell. 
 
 c 13 Wall. 394, Tlie Siren. 
 
 d 92 U. S. 306, Chamberlain »R.E. 
 
 6 98 U. S. 437, Carr v. U. S. 
 
 S3g. 
 
 u 6 Wall. 267, The Adela. 
 a 101 U. S. 42, The Florida. 
 
 SIK WTLtlAM PEEL, THE, 5 Wall. 
 
 Prize ; capture in neutral wa- 1 
 ters. a | 
 
 SIXTY PIPES OF BBANDY, 10 Wh. 481. 
 
 . Revenue; "probable cause of | a 97 U. S. 646, Stacey w. Emery, 
 seizure." a \ 
 
 SIXTY-SEVEN PACKS. DBY GOODS, V. S. v. See U.S. «. 67 Packs. Dry Goods. 
 SIZEB V. MANY, 16 H. 173. 
 
 Supreme Court; mandate ;" sec- I a 20 H. 480, Roberts «. Cooper, 
 ond writ of error, a | a 17 Wall. 284, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 
 SKEU.Y, JEFF. BBANCH BANK v. See Jefferson Brancli Bank u. Skelly. 
 SKELLERN v. MAY, 6 Cr. 867. 
 
 U. S. courts; are of limited juris- 
 diction, but ai-e not inferior conrts. a 
 
 Supi'eme Court mandate ; lower 
 court bound to carry into effect 
 though jurisdiction was not al- 
 leged. 6 
 
 a 10 Wh. 199, McCormicke.SuUi- 
 
 vant. 
 a 3 P. 201, ex parte Watkins. 
 6 12 P. 341, ex parte Storv. 
 b 3 H. 424, Bridge Co. B.Stewart. 
 a 6 I-I. 36. Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 b 8 H. 605, Kcnnedv v. St. Bank. 
 b n Wall. 674, Cook u. Bnniley. 
 b 12 Wall. 129, Noocian u. Bradley 
 b 17 Wall. 283, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 6 102 U. S. 255, Williams e.Bruffy. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 269 
 
 SliAClfM V. POMEKOT, 6 Cr. 281. 
 
 Error; what defects appellate a 4 H. 143, Garland u. Davis, 
 court win notice of own motion ; a 20 H. 433, Suydam v. Williamson 
 error apparent on face of record, a a 1 Wall. 601. Pomeroyu. Bank. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 661, Ro^erswBnrlington 
 
 a 10 Wall. 261, R. R. v. Morgan. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 403, Earth v. Clise. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 386, Ins. Co. «. Piaggio. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 130, R. R. v. Trustees. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 81, Storm ». U. S. 
 SI'ACTJM, SIMMS v. See Simms u. Slacnm. 
 SI.ATER V. ElVEEKSON, 19 H. 839. 
 
 Contracts ; when time is of the a 22 H. 37, Emerson v. Slater, 
 essence; quantum meruit, a a 23 H. 234, Dermott u. Jones. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 28, Jones v. U. S. 
 SLATER, EMERSON v. See Emerson v. Slater. 
 SLATER V. MAXWELL, 6 Wall. 276. 
 
 Judicial sales; equity; frand. a | a 7 Wall. 561, Cocks ». Izard. 
 SLAUGHTER, GROVES v. See Groves v. Slaughter. 
 SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES, 10 Wall. 273. 
 
 Supreme Court; supersedeas, a I a 12 Wall. 99, French ». Shoemaker 
 
 I a 93 U. S. 88, Kitchen u. Randolph 
 
 SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES, 16 Wall. 57. 
 
 Constitution; "privileges and 
 immunities" of citizens; who arc 
 "citizens of the U. S. ; " fourteenth 
 amendment, a 
 
 a 16 Wall. 139, Bradwell v. State. 
 a 18 Wall. 133, Bartemeyer^Iowa 
 a 92 U. S. 549, U. S.»Cruiksh;ink 
 a 96 U. S. 100, Davidson B.N. Orl. 
 a 100 U. S. 306, Strauder ». W.Va. 
 a 100 U. S. 345, ex parte Virginia. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 643, The Belfast. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 412, Four Packages v. 
 
 U.S. 
 
 a 6 H. 378, Nav. Co. v. Bank. 
 b 24 H. 458, Freeman v. Howe, 
 c 6 Wall. 195, Riggs v John. Co. 
 d 91 U. S. 661, Lamp v. Brass Co. 
 
 SLAVERS, THE, 2 WaU. 393. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; maritime 
 liens; suits in rem and personam, a 
 
 Seizures, b 
 
 SLOCOMB, COM. & R. R. BAMK v. See Commercial & E. E. Bank v. Slocomb. 
 SLOCUM r. MATBERRT, 2 Wh. 1. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction; seizures 
 under revenue laws, a 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction; State 
 and Federal courts. 6 
 
 State courts ; no power over judg- 
 ments of Federal courts, c 
 
 Jurisdiction, d 
 SMALtET, Mcdonald v. see McDonalds. Smalley. 
 SMALLS, DE TREVTLLE v. See De Treville v. Smalls. 
 SMITH V. ADSIT, 16 W^aU. 186. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to I a 23 Wall. 374, Smith v. Adsit. 
 State court ; Federal question. a | 
 SMITH, A3IIS T. See Amis v. Smith. 
 SMITH, BANK OF U. S. v. See Bank of U. S. v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. BELL, 6 P. 74. 
 
 Wills; bequests; life estate, a I a 93 U. S. 333, Brant v. Coal Co. 
 Interpretation. 6 | 6 98 U. S. 324, Blake v. Hawkins. 
 
270 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SMITH, BLUNT v. See Blunt v. Smith. 
 SMITH, BUCHANAN v. See Buclianau v. Smitli. 
 SMITH, BUBKX: v. See Burke v. Smith. 
 SMITH, BURTON v. See Burton v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. CLAPP, 15 P. laS. 
 
 U. S.; suits by assigneps; 11th i a 21 H. 576, White v. K. R. Co. 
 sec. judiciary act. a \ 
 
 SMITH, CI.ABK T. See Olark v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. CLAKKE, 18 H. 81. 
 
 Supreme Court; appeal; dismis- I a 11 Wall. 87, The' Protector. 
 sal for defects, a I 
 
 SMITH V. CONDKT, 1 H.,88. 
 
 Collision ; when eachparty bears 
 his own loss, a 
 Torts; by what law governed, b 
 
 SMITH, DAUDEtET v. See Daudelet v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. BDKINGTON, 8 Cr. 66. 
 
 Wills; statutes of Virginia; after- 
 acquired property ; eflect of new 
 law on existing wills, a 
 
 SMITH, FARM. AND MECH. BANK v. See Farm, and Meoh. Bank v, Smith. 
 SMITH V. GOOBTEAK DENTAX CO., 93 U. S. 486. 
 
 a 14 H. 534, Stainback v. Kae. 
 6 7 Wall. 64, The China. 
 
 a 16 H. 279, Carroll v. Carroll. 
 
 Patent law; application for pat- 
 ent; abandonment, a 
 
 Goodyear's patent for artificial 
 teeth; patents for products ; "pro- 
 cesses;" equivalents. 6 
 
 SMITH, HILI. T. See Hill v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. HONEY, 3 P. 469. 
 
 Supreme Court ; " value of mat- 
 ter in dispute." a 
 
 SMITH V. HUNTER, 7 H. 740. 
 
 Writ of error to State court ; 
 how Federal question must be 
 shown, a 
 
 a 101 U. S. 488,.Plan'g Co. v. Keith 
 b 102 U. S. 224, Goodyear ». Davis. 
 
 a 15 H. 207, Kauouse v. Martin. 
 a 4 Wall. 164, Walker v. U. S. 
 a 91 U. S. 366, The D. R. Martin. 
 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 
 a 12 H. 102, Neilson v. Lagow. 
 
 a 20 H. 27, Christ Church v. Phila. 
 SMITH, HUSSET v. See Hussey v. Smith. 
 SMITH, KEHR v. See Kehr v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. KERNOCHEN, 7 H. 198. 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship, a 
 
 Sec. 11 judiciary act ; suits by as- 
 signees. 6 
 
 Colorable transfer to give juris- 
 diction, c 
 
 a 14 H. 508, Sheppard v. Graves. 
 b 16 H. 630, Deshler ». Dodge. 
 a 3 Wall. 423, De Sobry v. Nich- 
 olson, 
 c 6 Wall. 288, Baruey v. Baltim'e. 
 
 SMITH, KIRK V. See Kirk v. Smith. 
 SMITH, KNOX V. See Knox v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. MoCANN, 24 H. 398. 
 
 Execution in District of Colum- I 
 
 bia ; equitable interests, o 
 
 SMITH, McCOOL V. See McCool v. Smith. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 361, MorseU v. Bank. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 271 
 
 SMITH V. SIARTLAND, 6 Cr. 886. 
 
 Supreme Comt ; writ of error to 
 State court; title set up uuder a 
 treaty ; Federal question, a 
 
 Alienage ; oIBce found. 6 
 
 SMITH T. MAKTIAND, 18 H. 76. 
 
 Constitution ; first ten amend- 
 ments do not apply to States, a 
 
 States; title to beds of tide 
 waters ; riparian rights. & 
 
 SMITH V. MJVSON, 14 "WaU. 419. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; liens, a 
 Supervisory jurisdiction, b 
 Bankrupt and State courts, c 
 
 ' Circuit Court ; jurisdiction under 
 
 the bankrupt act. d 
 
 SMITH, MTT.T.S V. See MUls v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. NICHOLS, 31 WaU. lia. 
 
 Patent law; "invention." a 
 Disclaimers. 6 
 
 a 1 Wh. S.oG, Martin v. Hunter. 
 a 8 Wli. 402, Society f. N. Haven, 
 a 4 P. 429, Craig v. Missouri. 
 a 10 P. 391. Crowell v. Randall. 
 a 12 H. 119, "Williams v. Oliver. 
 6 5 Wall. 268, U. S. v. Eepetigny. 
 
 a 7 Willi. 327, Twit.ohell v. Com'li 
 a 21 Willi. 557, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 a 92 U. S. 552. U. S. v. Cruikshank 
 & 94 U. S. 394, McCrciidy v. Va. 
 
 a IG Wall. 556, Marshall v. Knox. 
 6 19 Wall. 286, Colt v. Eoblnsou. 
 6 23 Wall. 160, Stirkney v. Wilt, 
 c 91 U. S. 526, Evster v. Giitt'. 
 c 92 U. S. 83, O'Brien v. Wold. 
 d98U. S. 23. GU^iinyu. I.angdon 
 6 98 U. S. 249, Gifford v. Helms. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 159, Roberts v. Ryer. 
 a 92 U. S. 355, Reokeudorfer v. 
 
 Faber. 
 6 94 U. S. 193, Dunbar v. Myers. 
 
 SMITH, OKTON V. See Orton o. Smith. 
 
 SMITH, BATLKOAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. v. Smith. 
 
 SMITH, KAT T. See Ray v. Smith. 
 
 SMITH V. MCHAKDS, 13 P. 37. 
 
 False representations; con- 
 tracts, a 
 
 a 92 U. S. 9, Blease v. Gar- 
 lington. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 637, Lumber Co. v. 
 Buchtel. 
 
 SMITH, RICHMOND v. See Richmond v. Smith. 
 
 SMITH V. SAC CO., 11 Wall. 146. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads ; bona-fide purchasers, a 
 
 SMITH V. SHEELEY, 13 Wall. 368. 
 
 Estoppel; gnintor. a 
 SMITH, SHERMAN v. See Sherman i 
 
 a 94 U. S. 663, DtiUas v. Mackenzie 
 a 94 U. S. 758, Collins v. Gilbert. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 295, Myers v. Croft. 
 
 '. Smith. 
 
 388. 
 
 SMITH V. SWORMSTEDT, 16 H, 
 
 Parties; joint interests, a 
 
 Suits in equity vviiere parties are 
 numerous, b 
 SMITH, THELIiUSON v. See TheUuson v. Smith. 
 S»IITH, THOBINGTON v. See Thoringtcn v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. TRABUE, 9 P. 4. 
 
 a 17 H. 592, Ayres v. Carver. 
 b 18 H. 480, Bacon v. Robertson. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 Writs of restitutiofi. 6 
 
 a 12 P. 327, Toland v. Sprague. 
 6 2 Wall.- 56, Gregg v. Forsyth. 
 6 5 Wall. 194, Barton v. Forsyth. 
 
272 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 5 P. 385, Farrar v. U. S. 
 6 10 P. 357, U. S. ». Bi-adley. 
 a 17 H. 438, Bruce v. U. S. 
 c 9 Wall. 703, Watkins v. U. S. 
 a 100 U. S. • 11, Soule v. U. S. 
 a 102 U. S. 552, U. S. v. Pinson. 
 
 a 10 P. 338, Wherry v. TJ. S. 
 6 12 P. 436, Strother v. Lucas. 
 6 11 Hi 86, U. S. V. Boisdore. 
 b 101 U. S. 706, D'Aaterive».U. S. 
 
 SMITH, TURNER v. See Turner ■». Smith, 
 SMITH V. V. S., 6 P. 895. 
 
 U.S.; suits against public officers; 
 transcripts from the Treasury ; au- 
 thentication of. a 
 
 Defective st.atutory boud ; when 
 good as a common-law bond. 6 
 
 Accounts of public officers, c 
 
 SMITH V. V. S., 10 P. 337. 
 
 Louisiana land titles; act of 1824; 
 imperfect grants, a 
 
 What property rights were pro- 
 tected by the treaty, b 
 SMITH, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Smith. 
 SMITH v. UNIVBRSAIi INS. CO., 6 Wi. 176. 
 
 Marine insurance ; abandon- I a 12 P. 391, Bradlie v. Ins. Co. 
 ment. a \ 
 
 SMITH, VASSB V. See Vasse v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. VAUGHAN, 10 P. 366. 
 
 Certificates of division, a I a 7 H. 190, U. S. ». Chicago. 
 
 I a 7 Wall. 581, U. S. v. Eosenburgh. 
 
 SMITH, VENTKESS v. See Tentress v. Smith. 
 SMITH, 'WARD V. See Ward v. Smith. 
 SMITH V. WASHINGTON, 80 H. 146. 
 
 Municipal corporations ; liability I a 99 U. S. G41, Trans. Co. v Chicago 
 for personal injuries, a \ 
 
 SMITH, WHEELER v. See Wheeler v. Smith. 
 SMITH, WHITE'S BANK v. See White's Bank v. Smith. 
 SMITH, WILSON v. See Wilson v. Smith. 
 SMOOT'S CASE, 16 WaU. 47. 
 
 U. S.; contracts with ; damages. a | a 94 U. S. 217, U. S. ». Smith. 
 
 SMYTHE V. FISKE, 23 WaU. 380. 
 
 Kevenue laws ; duties ; designa- | a 96 U. S. 113, Arthur u. Lahey. 
 tion of articles, a | a 102 U. S. 212, Solomon u. Arthur 
 
 SMYTHE, REICHE v. See Reiche v. Smythe. 
 SMYTH V. STRADER, 4 H. 404. 
 
 Negotiable paper; assignments; 
 delivery; bona-fide holders, a 
 
 SMYTH V. STRADER, 13 H. 337. 
 
 Supreme Court ; wrifc of error ; 
 dismissal, a 
 Joint decrees ; severance. 6 
 
 SNEAD V. McCOtTL, 13 H. 407. 
 
 Debt ; discliarge of debtor ; re- 
 viving lien, a 
 Capias ad satisfaciendam. b 
 
 SISEED, TENNESSEE v. See Tennessee i). Sueed. 
 SNEED V. WISTER, 8 Wh. 690. 
 
 Appeal bonds ; interest, a | a 95 U. S. 618, The Wanata. 
 
 a 4 H. 586, Bradford v. Williams. 
 
 a 16 H. 144, Davenport v. Fletcher, 
 o 11 Wall. 86, The Protector. 
 6 20 Wall. loS, Simpson v. Greeley. 
 
 a 15 H. 194, Kockhill v. Hanna. 
 6 15 H. 296, Magniac v. Thompson. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 273 
 
 SOCIETY, &c., V. NEW HAVEN, 8 WU. 464. 
 
 Foreign corporations; rights not la 4 P. 500, Society, &o., v. Piiwlet 
 (livestecTby the Revolution, a I a 12 P. 749, Rliode Island v. Mass. 
 
 SOCIETY, &o., v. PAWI.ET, 4 P. 480. 
 
 Adverse possession ; ouster, a 
 
 Bona-fide purchasers; hold ad- 
 versely to all the world. 6 
 
 Retrospective laws, c 
 
 Corporate existence ; plea of gen- 
 eral issue admits capacity to sue. d 
 
 a 5 P. 355, Clarke v. Courtney. 
 a 5 P. 439, Bradstreet v. HuMtliis- 
 
 ton. 
 a G P. 691, U. S. V. Arredondo. 
 a 12 P. 457, Str-other v. Lucas. 
 a 16 P. 51, Watkins v. Holman. 
 a 3 H. 687, Clymer v. Dawldna. 
 a 2 Wall. 349, Harvey v. Tvler. 
 b 5 Wall. 287, Croxall v. Shererd. 
 c 8 Wall. 603, Dreliman v. Stifle. 
 d 22 Wail. 101, U. S. v. Ins. Co. 
 d 96 U. S. 329, Pullman v. Upton. 
 
 SOCIETY FOR SAVINGS v. COITE, 6 Wall. 608. 
 
 a 6 Wall. G22, Prov. Inst. v. Mass. 
 6 12 Wall. 224, St. Ton. Tax. Cas. 
 c 15 Wall. 272, St. F'g't Tax. Cas. 
 6 20 Wall. 61, R. R. v. Maguire. 
 6 92 U. S. 603, St. R. R. Tax Cas. 
 c 97 U. S. 572, Cook v. Penn. 
 6 99 U. S. 279, Tr. Co. v. Wheeling 
 
 Constitution ; taxation by State 
 of U. S. securities; of corporate 
 property generally, a 
 
 Power of State to tax. 6 
 
 Constitutionality determined by 
 the subject on which the burden is 
 laid, c 
 
 SOHN V. WATEKSON, 17 W^all. 596. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- i a 95 U. S. 633, Terry v. Anderson, 
 tracts ; statutes of limitations, a \ 
 
 - SOMERVILI-E v. HAMILTON, 4 Wh. 330. 
 
 Certificates of division, a | a 3 Wall. 255, Daniels u. R.R. Co. 
 
 SOaiEKVII,I,E, McCKEAKY v. See McCreary v. SomerTille. 
 SOULAKD, JONES V. See Jones v. Soulard. 
 SOUtAKD V. TT. S., 4 P. 611. 
 
 Missouri land titles ; imperfect 
 Spanish title ; sale of the land by 
 the U. S. a 
 
 Efl'ect of tlie cession of Louisiana 
 on lights of inhabitants. 6 ; 
 
 Grants by lieutenant-governors, c 
 
 a 10 P. 104, Soulard u. U. S. 
 
 b 10 P. 326, Smith v. U. S. 
 
 6 12 P. 436, Strother u. Lucas. 
 
 c 8 H. 301, Menard u. Massey. 
 
 6 10 H. 242, Hornsby v. U. S. 
 
 6 19 Wall. 141, Carpenter v. Ran- 
 
 nels. 
 a 21 Wall. 672, Morton u. Nebraska 
 
 a 13 H. 252, Glenn v. U. S. 
 
 6 16 H. 96, McCabewWorthington 
 
 See Pacific Ins. CO: u. Soule. 
 
 SOUXARD V. U. S., 10 P. 100. 
 
 Missoiu-i titles; Spanish cora- 
 raandants; concessions, a 
 Relation ; docti-iiie of. 6 
 
 SOIILE, PACIFIC INS. CO 
 
 SOUTHARD, RUSSEIX v. See Knssell -i). Soule. 
 SOUTHARD v. RUSSEI.I., 16 H. 547. 
 
 Bills of review, a | a 1 Bl. 489, U. S. ». Knight. 
 
 SOUTHARD, WAYMAN v. See Waymaa u. Southard. 
 SOUTH CAROLINA v. GEORGIA, 93 U. S. 4. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce ; riglit of the States over nav- 
 igable waters, a 
 18 
 
 a 96 U. S. 387, Wisconsin v. Duluth 
 
274 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SOUTH CAROLINA, HUGEB v. See Hager v. South Oarolina. 
 SOUTHGATE, PATAPSCO INS. CO. v. See Patapsoo Ins. Oo. v. Southgate. 
 SOUTHMATD, V. S. v. See U. S. v. Southmayd. 
 
 SOUTTER, MEL. & MINN. R. R. CO. v. See Mil. & Minn. E. R. Co. •<,. Soutter. 
 SPAIN T. HAMIMON, 1 WaU. 604. 
 
 Equitable assignments, a \ al5 Wall. 226, Oelriehs v. Spain. 
 
 SPARROW T. STRONG, 3 Wall. 103. 
 
 Sup. Court ; final judgments, a 
 Pre-emptors; sale before pat- 
 ent, b 
 
 a 4 Wall. 594, Sparrow v. Strong. 
 6 18 Wall. 314, Lamb v. Davenport 
 
 SPARROW T. STRONG, 4 WaU. 584. 
 
 Sup. Court; bills of exceptions, a | a 95 U. S. 190, Kerr v. Clampitt. 
 
 SPEAKE V. tr. S., 9 Cr. aS. 
 
 Equitable estoppels, a | a 5 H. 274, Taylor v. Benham. 
 
 SPEAR T. PtACE, 11 H. 6S5. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals in ad- 
 miralty ; amount in dispute, a 
 
 a 12 H. 352, Ricii v. Lambert. 
 a 17 H. 4, Shields v. Thomas. 
 a 5 Wall. -210, Seaver v. Bigelows. 
 a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty. 
 
 SPECHT v. HOWARD, 16 Wall. 664. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; parol evi- I a 91 U. S. 294, Porsythe v. Kimball, 
 dence. a \ 
 
 SPEED, OWINGS v. Se Owings v. Speed. 
 SPENCER, ERENCH v. See French v. Spencer. 
 SPENCER T. lAPStEY, 90 H. 864. 
 
 Texas land titles under Spain, a 
 U. S. courts ; amendments ; dis- 
 cretion not reviewable. 6 
 Testimoniosi c 
 
 a 21 H. 175, U. S. «. Sutter. 
 6 24 H. 157, Eberley v. Moore. 
 b 11 Wall. 676, Cook v. Burnley, 
 c 20 Wall. 284, McPhaula. Lapsley 
 
 SPERRT, BRIDGES v. See Bridges v. Sperry. 
 SPOEPORD V. KIRK, 97 U. S. 484. 
 
 U. S.; assignments of claims ; act 
 of 1853. a 
 
 a 98 U. S. 186, McKnight v. U.S. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 558, Goodman v. Nib- 
 lack. 
 
 SPRAGUE, TOtAND v. See Toland v. Sprague. 
 SPRAXT V. 8PRATT, 1 P. 344. 
 
 Descents ; District of Columbia.a | a 94 U. S. 777, Hogan v. Kurtz. 
 
 SPRIGG V. BANK OF MOUNT PLEASANT, 10 P. as7. 
 
 Bonds; when parties bound as 
 principals, a 
 Parol evidence ; in equity, b 
 Pleading; judgmentgivcnagainst 
 party whose pleading first defect- 
 ive, c 
 
 a 14 P. 203, Sprigg v. Bank. 
 
 6 17 H. 445, Hendriokson v. Hink- 
 
 ley. 
 c 7 Wall. 93, Aurora v. West. 
 6 99 U. S. 46, U. S. v. Ames. 
 
 SPRUNG v. GRAY, 6 P. 151. 
 
 Limitations ; exceptions ; a c- I a 12 P. 327, Toland v. Sprague. 
 counts between merchants, a \ opia^ue. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPTIEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 275 
 
 SPBINGPIEUJ V. OUICK, 88 H. 56. 
 
 Land laws ; grant of sec. 16 for | a 94 U. S. 794, Davis v. Indiana, 
 school lands, a 
 
 SPRINGS CO., COAVEIX v. See Cowell v. Springs Co. 
 SPBOTT V. XT. S., 80 'WaU. 459. 
 
 The civil war ; what acts of the, 
 Confedei-ate States valid, a 
 Acts in aid of the x-ebellion. b 
 Capture of cotton, c 
 
 a 22 Wall. 102, U. S. »; Ins. Co. 
 6 92 U. S. 170, Whitfield v. U. S. 
 6 96 U. S. 195, Dewing v. Perdic- 
 
 ai-ies. 
 c 97 U. S. 58, Young v. U. S. 
 a 97 U. S. 465, Keith v. Clark. 
 a 99 U. S. 190, Ketch um v Bucliley 
 
 STACET T. THBASSER, 6 H. 44. 
 
 Administrators in dififerent juris- 
 dictions, a 
 
 When recovery against one evi- 
 dence against the other, b 
 
 STAPrOKD V. tnSTON BAUK, 16 H. 136. 
 
 a 13 H. 462, Hill v. Tucker. 
 6 18 H. 17, McLean v. Meek. 
 
 Supersedeas, a 
 
 Supreme Court; mandamus. 
 
 STATNBACH v. SA£, 14 H. 538. 
 
 Collision ; when each ship must 
 bear its own loss, a 
 
 a 17 H. 279, Stafford v. Un. Bank. 
 a 3 Wall. 701, U. S. v. Dashiel. 
 6 7 Wall. 876, eai^ctj-ie Bradlej'. 
 a 12 Wall. 99, Freneli v. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 a 21 Wall. 29, Jeromes. McCarter 
 
 a 21 H. 194, The Gray » The Fi-aser 
 a 24 H. 125, Palmer v. U. S. 
 a 24 H. 313, Un. S. S. Co. v S. S.Co. 
 a 2 Wall. 560, The Morning Liglit 
 
 STAIRS v. FI:ASI.X:JE:, is H. 588. 
 
 Duties; at what time value of im- 
 portation ascertained, a 
 
 Appraisers ; when their action 
 final, b 
 
 STAITBROUGH, COI-IilER v. See Collier v. Stanbrough. 
 STAKFORD v. TAYLOR, 18 H. 418. 
 
 Missouri land claims ; want of 
 survey; court has no authority to 
 ascertain boundary, a 
 
 STASTLEY V. COLT, 5 Wall. 163. 
 
 Statutes ; validity of private acts 
 affecting real property, a 
 
 a 19 H. 382, Ballard v. Thomas. 
 a 20 H. 578, Sampson v. Peaslee. 
 b 24 H. 522, Belcher v. Linn. 
 6 10 Wall. 452, Kimball v. Coll'r. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 661, Maguire v. Tyler. 
 a 17 Wall. 280, Tyler v. Magvvire. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 286, Croxall v. Shererd. 
 a 7 Wall. 624, Beloit v. Morgan. 
 a 95 U. S. 312, OuldwWash.Hosp'l 
 
 STANIEY V. GADSBY, 10 P. 681. 
 
 Usury ; relief in equity, a | a 1 Wall. 624, Spain v. Hamilton. 
 
 STAlfSBURY, V. S. v. See U. S. v. Stansbury. 
 STANTON V. EMBBY, 93 U. S. 548. 
 
 Bills of exceptions ; signing, a | a 102 U. S. 353, Hunnicutt v Peyton 
 STANTON, lilNTON v. See Linton v. Stanton. 
 STAR OF HOPE, THE, 9 Wall. 888. 
 
 General average, a U 12 Wall. 114, Fowler i; Rathboncs 
 
 ' a 92 U. S. 400, Hobson v. Lord. 
 
276 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 STAKK, CHES. INS. CO. v. See Chesapeake Ins. Co. v. Stark. 
 
 STABK V. CKES. INS. CO., 7 Cr. 43». 
 
 Cpi-tificates ; when evidence, a | a 91 U. S. 245 Ins. Co. v. Tisdale. 
 
 STABK V. STAKKS, 6 Wall. iOft. 
 
 Land titles ; Oregon donation 
 act. a 
 
 Wlien equity will hold possessor 
 of legal title a trustee, b 
 
 Patent ; when execution and de- 
 livery ministerial acts, c 
 
 When a party is regarded as the 
 equitable owner of public lands, d 
 
 "Cloud on title." e 
 
 a 94 
 c 97 
 d 98 
 c 101 
 e 101 
 as 101 
 
 Wall. 225, Silver v. Ladd. 
 Wall. 458, Meaderj). Norton. 
 Wall. 84, Johnson » To wsley 
 Wall. 102, GibsoQu Chouteau 
 U. S. 484, Stark v. Starrs. 
 U. S. 654, Barney v. Dolph. 
 U. S. 121, Wirth v. Branson. 
 U. S. 261, Simmons cWagn'r 
 U. S. 375, Phelps v. Harns. 
 U. S. 507, Hall v. Kussell. 
 
 STABK T. STABBS, 94 V. S. 477. 
 
 Oregon ; public lands in ; dona- \a 97 U. S. 654, Barney ». Dolpb. 
 tion act. a | a lOlU. S. 507, Hall ». Eussell. 
 
 STABKE, HICKIIT v. Sec Hiokey v. Starke. 
 
 STABBS, STABK V. See Stark v. Starrs. 
 
 STATE, BBADWEIX. v. See Bradwell v. State. 
 
 STATE, MULEB v. See Miller v. State. 
 
 STATE BANK, MBB. BANK V. See Mercftants' Bank v. State Bank. 
 
 STATE BANK OF OHIO v. KNOOP, 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; exemption from taxation, o 
 
 U. S. courts ; force of State de- 
 cisions. 6 
 
 Power of legislature over char- 
 ters, c 
 
 Jurisdiction where a State is in- 
 terested ; court will not look be- 
 yond the record, d 
 
 16 H. 376. 
 
 a 16 H. 440, O. Trust Co.B.Debolt. 
 a 18 H. 366, Dodge v. Woolsev. 
 a IS H. 383, Mech. Bank v. Debolt. 
 a 18 H. 385, Mech. Bank v. Thomas 
 a 1 B1.442, Jeff. Bank v. Kelly. 
 a 1 Bl,475, Frank. Bank v. Ohio. 
 a 2 Bl. 544, Wrights). Sill. 
 b 1 Wall. 393, Meyer v. Muscatine 
 a 4 Wall. 554, Van Hoffman v. 
 
 Quineey. 
 a 8 Wall. 438, Home v. Rouse, 
 c 13 Wall. 214, Penn. Coll. Cases. 
 a 13 Wall. 376, Salt. Co. v. East 
 
 Saginaw. 
 d 16 Wall. 220, Davis v. Grav. 
 a 21 Wall. 498, Erie R. R. s.'Penii. 
 a 95 U. S. 690, Farringtonu.Tenn. 
 
 STATE BANK NOBTH CAB., U. S. v. See U. S. v. State Bank NOTth Carolina. 
 
 STATE FBEIGHT TAX CASE, 15 WaU. 233. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 481, Osborne v. Mobile.. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 472, R. R. v. Maryland. 
 
 b 91 U. S. 282, Welton v Missouri, 
 
 c 92 U. S. 603, State R. Tax Cases 
 
 a 95 U. S. 470, R. R. Co. v. Husen 
 
 a 97 U. S. 572, Cook v. Penn. 
 6 100 U. S. 678, Maoh. Co. U.Gage. 
 
 STATE HABBOR COM'ES, WALKER v. See Walker v. State Harbor Com'rs. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce, a 
 
 Tax on imports. 6 
 
 Power of the States to tax cor- 
 porations, c 
 
MANUAL OF SUPUEMB COURT DKCISIONS. 
 
 277 
 
 STATE BATLROAD TAX CASES, 93 V. 
 
 Supreme Coiiit ; advancing 
 cases, a 
 
 Corporations ; taxation of •' cap- 
 ital stock." 6 
 
 Obligatory force of State decis- 
 ions, c 
 
 STATE TAX OU FOEEIGSf-HBLD BOBTDS, 15 Wall. 319. 
 
 S. 601. 
 a 93 U. S. 2, Hose «. R. R. Co. 
 b 96 U. S. 435, R.R.Co. tJ.Vance, 
 c 100 U. S. 53, Fairfield!). Gallatin 
 
 Taxation; extent of the power, a 
 Constitution ; impairing obliga- 
 tion of contract, b 
 
 a 19 Wall. 499. Tappan ». Bank. 
 
 b 96 U, S. 448, Murray a. Charles- 
 ton. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 497, Kirtland v. Hotch- 
 kiss, 
 
 STATE TAX BAItWAT GROSS RECEIPTS, 15 Wall. 8S4. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com 
 merce. a 
 Power of the States to tax. b 
 
 STATE TOmSr AGE TAX CASKS, 
 
 Constitution ; tonnage tax. < 
 Regulation of eonimeree. h 
 
 a IG Wall. 481, Osborne«). Mobile. 
 a 18 Wall. 232, Delaware R.K. Tax 
 i 92 U. S. 603, State R. Tax Cases 
 a 94 U. S. 135, Munn v. Illinois. 
 a 95 U. S. 487, Hall «. De Cuir. 
 b 96 U. S. 446, Murray v. Charles- 
 i ton. 
 
 18 W^all. 809. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 584, Peete v. Morgan. 
 a 20 Wall. 581, Cannon v. N. Orl. 
 6 93 U. S. 102, Sherlock v. AUhig. 
 a 94 U. S. 244, S. S. Co. ». Tinker. 
 b 99 U. S. 277, Tr. Co. ^.Wheeling. 
 
 STATHAM, IMUT. IXFE ZNS. CO. v. See N. Y. Mat. Life Ins. Co. v. Statliam. 
 STEAD, COURSE v. See Course •[■. Stead. 
 STEAD V. COURSE, 4 Cr, 403. 
 
 Tax sales, a I « 4 VA'^h. 76, Williams c. Peyton, 
 
 <i 9 H. 256, Mason v. Fearson. 
 I a 16 H. 615, Early v. Doe. 
 ! a 13 Wall. 512, French «. Edwards. 
 STEAMBOAT CO. t. CHASE, 16 Wall. 634. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 218, The Lottawanna. 
 b 93 U. S. 104, Sherlock w. Ailing. 
 c 93 XJ. S. 316, The Atlas. 
 a 99 U. S. 43, U. S. v. Ames. 
 d 102 D. S. 119, Schoonmakcr v. 
 Gil more. 
 
 Admiralty ; State Jjegislature 
 cannot create maritime lien, a 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of cora- 
 merce ; State legislation, b 
 
 Remedy for los^s of cargo, c 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction; naviga- 
 ble waters, d 
 
 STEAMSHIP CO. V. JOLIEFE, a ■Rrall. 450. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- j a 6 Wall, 34, S. S. Co. v. Wardens, 
 merce ; pilotage, a \ 
 
 STEAMSHIP CO., NEW OEtEANS v. See New Orleans v. Steamship Co. 
 STEAMSHIP CO. V. POBT WABBENS, 6 Wall. 33. 
 
 Constitution ; toiniage tax; reg- 
 ulation of commerce, a 
 
 a 12 Wall. 218, St. Ton. Tax. Cas, 
 a 16 Wall. 475, Morgan wParham. 
 a 20 Wall. 581, Cannon v. N. Orl. 
 a 94 U. S. 244, S. S. Co. v. Tinker. 
 a 94 U. S. 247, Fosters. New Orl. 
 a 95 U.S. 86, Packet Co. W.Keo- 
 kuk. 
 a 100 U. S. 677, Mach. Co. v. Gage. 
 
278 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT BECISIOITS. 
 
 STEARNS T. PAGE, 7 H. 819. 
 
 Equity ; ]imitations ; concealed a 23 H. 208, Beaubien ». Beatibien 
 fraud, a • a 21 Wall. 349, Bailey v. Glovor. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 203, Goddeii v. Kiin- 
 
 t mell. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 140, Wood t Carpenter 
 
 STEBBINS, NEWTOWN T. See Newtown v. StebbiQS. 
 
 STEELE, SECOMBE v. See Secmnbe v. Steele. 
 
 STEEXE, WOOD v. See Wood v. Steele. 
 
 STEIN V. BOWTVtAN, 13 P. 319. 
 
 Evidence ; incompetency on ae- 1 o 4 H. 413, Smyth v. Strader. 
 count of interest, a | a 5 H. 94, Bridges it. Annour. 
 
 STEINBACH V. STEWART, II WaU. 673. 
 
 War ; suspension of limitations.a | a 14 Wall. 236, Caperton v. Bowyer 
 
 STEINES V. FBANKUN CO., 14 Wall. 15. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error 
 to State court ; Federal question, a 
 Eehearings. 6 
 
 STEI.I.E V. CABBOU^ la P. 801, 
 
 Dower ; in equity of redemption.a 
 
 as 14 Wall. 26, Ken.K. K. ». B. R. 
 &95U. S. 100, Buffingtonjr Harvey 
 
 a 13 P. 296, Tan Ness v. Hyatt. 
 a 15 P. 37, Maybury v. Brien. 
 a 16 H. 599, Calvert v. Bradley. 
 
 STEPHEN MOBGAN, THE, 94 r. S. 599. 
 
 Supreme Court ; only an appel- I a 100 U. S. 527, Mt. Pleasant v. 
 lant can assign error, a \ Beckwi:th. 
 
 STEEBY, HABBISON v. See Harrison v. Sterry. 
 STETTINIUS, VIOLETT v. See Violettii. Stettinins. 
 STEVENS T. CADY, 14 H. 538. 
 
 Execution ; whether patents and 
 copyrights can be seized, a 
 
 a97U 
 
 STEVENS, GIBSON v. See Gibson v. SteTens. 
 STEVENS T. GLADDING, 17 H. 447. 
 
 Copyright, a | a 07 U. S. 506, Pattei-son r. Ky. 
 
 STEVENS V. GLADDING, 19 H. 64. 
 
 Supreme Court; error; how it 
 must appear, a 
 
 When not properly shown, judg- 
 ment will be affirmed. 6 
 
 STEVENSON V. WILLIAMS, 19 WaU. 675. 
 
 Removals, a | a 94 U. S. 651, Lowe ». Williams, 
 
 STEWAET, DENNISrOWN v. See Bennistown «. Stewart. 
 STBWAKT, HICKEY v. See Hickey «. Stewart. 
 STEWABT V. KAHN, 11 WaU. 500. 
 
 _ Statute of limitations ; suspen- 
 
 a 17 H. 450, Stevens ». Gladding. 
 a 19 H. 65, Stevens «. Gladding. 
 S. 506, Patterson d. Ky. 
 
 a 20 H. 440, Suydam v. AVilliamson 
 a 2 Bl. 484, Taylor jj. Morton. 
 6 1 Wall. 604, Pomeroy i>. Bank. 
 6 10 Wall. 260, R. R. Co. v Morgan 
 
 sion during the civil war. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to 
 State court; act of 1867; how 
 Federal question must appear. 6 
 
 Const.; reconstruction laws, c 
 
 a 11 Wall. 515, U. S. v. Wiley. 
 6 12 Wall. 694, Trebilcock » Wilson 
 c 13 Wall. 651, White v. Hart. 
 a 14 Wall. 235, Caperton v Bowyer 
 a 91 U. S. 714, Raj-mond« Thomas 
 a 92 U. S. 116, Harrison v. Myer. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 279 
 
 STEWABT, KERKISON v. See Kerrlson v. Stewart. 
 STEWART, liEVr v. See Levy «. Stewart. 
 STEWART, ]M!XLI.ER v. See Miller v. Stewart. 
 STEWABT, MURPHY v. See Murphy i). Stewart. 
 STEWAKT V. SAIAMON, 94 V. S. 434. 
 
 Confederate money, a | a 96 TJ. S. 587, Bissell ». HeyvvarJ. 
 
 STEWAKT, STEENBACH v. See Steinbacli v. Stewart. 
 
 STEWABT, WASH. BRIDGE CO. v. See Washington Bridge Co. «. Stewart. 
 STICKNEY V. WIXT, 83 WaU. 158. 
 
 Snpi'eme Court ; bankruptcy ap- 
 
 peals; supervisory jurisdiction of 
 Circuit Court, o 
 
 a 23 Wall. 292, Sandusky v. Bank. 
 a 93 XJ. S. 348, Wiawall n. Camp- 
 ball. 
 a 95 U. S. 257, Milner v. Meek. 
 a 95 U. S. 268, Nimick v. Coleman. 
 a 98 XJ. S. 369, Clev. Ins. v. Ins. Co. 
 
 STILES, GAMES v. See Games v. Stiles. 
 
 STEMPSON TT. BAXTIMORE & SUSQUEHANNA R. R. CO., 
 
 10 H. 341. 
 
 a 18 H. 61, Gi-aliam v. Bayne. 
 a 20 H. 434, Siiydam ». Williamson 
 a 1 Wall. 602,'Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 a 14 Wall. 53, Henderson's Spirits 
 b 15 Wall. 194, Gould v. Rees. 
 b 22 Wall. 28, Gill v. Wells. 
 6 23 Wall. 367, Eeedy v. Scott. 
 
 STIMPSON, PHEL. & TREN. R. R. v. See Phil, and Tren. R. E. v. Stimpson. 
 STEMPSON T. ■WnST CHESTER R. R. CO., 3 H. 555. 
 
 Special verdict ; agreed case ; Su- 
 preme Court ; review by writ of 
 error, a 
 
 Patent law; infringement; com- 
 binations. 6 
 
 Bill.s of exception, a 
 
 a 11 H. 158, U. S. V. Morgan. 
 
 STIMPSON V. WEST CHESTER R. R. CO., 4 H. 380. 
 
 Patent law; surrender of pat 
 ent and reissue. 
 Public use. 6 
 Ert'ect of the patent, c 
 
 STEMPSON V. WOODMAJS, 10 WaU. 181 
 
 Patent law; "invention." a 
 
 a 17 H. 84, Battin v. Taggert. 
 
 6 7 Wall. 607, Agagam v. Jordon. 
 
 c 11 Wall. 543, Seymour v Osborne 
 
 a 23 Wall. 563, Collar Co. v. Van 
 
 Dusen. 
 a 92 U. S. 353, Eeckendorfer v. 
 
 Faber. 
 a 94 U. S. 198, Dunbar v. Myers. 
 
 STITH, PEYTON v. See Peyton v. Stith. 
 STrX, WOLF V. See Wolf v. Stix. 
 STOCKDALE V. ENS. CO., 20 WaU. 388, 
 
 Internal revenue ; tax on divi- 
 dends of corporations and interest 
 paid, a 
 
 a 22 Wall. 633, Bailey «. E. E. Co. 
 a 94 U. S. 620, Erskine v. E. E. 
 a 95 U. S. 79, E. E. Co. v. Eose. 
 a 101 U. S. 549, E. E. Co. v. U. S. 
 
 STOCKTON V. BISHOP, 8 H. 74. 
 
 Supersedeas, a 
 
 a 11 H. 295, Hogan v. Eoss. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 292, Slaughter -House 
 
 Cases. 
 a 12 Wall. 100, French « Shoemaker 
 
280 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 STOCKTON V. BISHOP, 4 H. 167. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 Statute of jeofails. 
 
 (1 St. 91.) 6 
 
 STOCKTON V. rORD, 11 H. 838. 
 
 Louisiana; judicial mortgages, a 
 Equity; answer; insuflSciencj*. 6 
 
 STOCKWEII, T. U. S., 13 WaU. 513. 
 
 Debt ; action on a statute, a 
 Duties ; sec. 2 act of 1823 (3 St. 
 
 781) repealed by sec. 4 of the act of 
 
 1866. (14 St. 179.) 6 
 
 STODDARD V. CHAMBERS, 8 H. 317. 
 
 Missouri land titles; New Ma- a 
 drid warrants^ patent certificate ; b 
 surveys, a h 
 
 Reservation of land covered by a 
 concession, from s:ile. h c 
 
 Confirmation to legal represent- 6 
 atives ; title by estoppel, c d 
 
 Patents; how avoided, d e 
 
 Ejectment in U. S. courts may c 
 be brought when survey ha.s been 6 
 made, approved, and recorded, e f 
 
 Supreme Court ; exception not 
 taken below cannot be considered, f h 
 
 b 
 a 
 
 a 7 H. 714, Towusend v. .Tcnnisoii 
 6 13 H. 214. Morsell v. Hall. 
 b 7 Wall. 503, Ewing v. Howard. 
 6 91 U. S. 656, Phillips V. Scynioiir 
 
 a 18 H. 418. Stockton v. Ford. 
 6 7 Wall. 212, Brown «. Pierce. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 513, Carroll v. Green. 
 6 97 U. S. 549, U. S. v. Clafiin. 
 
 3 H. 51, Bei-i-y v. Gamble. 
 
 8 H. 301, Meuiird v. Massey. 
 
 8 H. 330, Bissell v. Penrose. 
 
 8 H. 361, Mills V. Stoddard. 
 • 10 H. 369, Landes v. Brant. 
 15 H. 535, DelaiiriercB. Emison. 
 19 H. 324, Field v. Seabury. 
 19 H. 334, Bryan v. Forsyth. 
 21 H. 302, Moielionse v. Phelps. 
 21 H. 428, Easton v. Salisbury. 
 
 3 Wall. 423, Di-Sobryv Nichol- 
 son. 
 
 18 Wall. 116, Bestu. Polk. 
 
 19 Wall. 032, Maokay v. Easton. 
 
 92 U. S. 713, Hot Springs Cas. 
 
 93 U. S. 216, Sherman u. Buick. 
 100 U. S. 583, Dickerson f. Col- 
 grove. 
 
 STODDARD, GUITARD v. See Guitard D. Stoddard. 
 STODDARD, MXLIiS T. See Mills v. Stoddard. 
 STOKES, GARLAND t. See Garland v. Stokes. 
 STOKES V. SALTONSTAXIi, 13 P. 181. 
 
 Carriers of passengers : liability, a 
 
 a 22 Wall . 350, E. K. Co. « Pollard 
 a 101 U. S. 463, City of Panama. 
 a 102 U. S. 455, Penu. Co. v. Koy. 
 
 STOKES, SEARIGHT v. See Seariglit v. Stokes. 
 STONE, HYDE v. See Hyde v. Stone. 
 STONE, U. S. V. See U. S. ■«. Stone. 
 STORY, EX PARTE, 18 P. 343. 
 
 Supreme Court ; rehearings. ( 
 Mandate ; execution of. 
 Chancery ; feigned issues, c 
 
 STORY, LIVINGSTON V. 
 
 6 H. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 
 11 Wall. 674, Cook v. Burnley. 
 
 17 Wall. 283, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 
 94 U. S. 372, Johnsons Harmon 
 
 6 102 U. S. 255, Williams u.Brufl'y. 
 
 See LiTingstou v. Story. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPKEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 281 
 
 STOBT V. LIVINGSTON, 13 P. 359. 
 
 Master's reports ; objections must 
 be made before the master, a 
 
 Chancery jurisdiction of U. S. 
 courts not controlled by practice of 
 State courts. 6 
 
 Parties, c 
 
 a 18 H. 508, MoMicken v. Pen-in. 
 6 20 H. 17, Jones v. McMa?t,ei-s. 
 c 7 Wall. 415, R. R. v. Howard, 
 c 16 Wall. 451, Ribon v. Railroad, 
 c 18 Wall. 474, Railroad v. On-. 
 a 20 Wall. 322, Memphis «. Brown 
 c 92 U. S. 172, Carey v. Brown. 
 a 100 U. S. 528, Mount Plciisant v. 
 Beokwith. 
 
 SXOVEB, FKEXZ v. See Fretz v. Stover. 
 STKADER V. BAI.D-WIN, 9 H. «61. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to 
 State court; Federal question, a 
 
 STBADEB V. GKAHAM, 10 H. 88. 
 
 Retrospective legislation, a 
 Slavery; by what law personal 
 status determined. 6' 
 
 a 18 H. 244, Calcote v. Stanton. 
 a 1 Wall. 517, Roosevelt u. Meyer. 
 
 a 10 H. 532, East Hartford v. Hart- 
 ford Bridge Co. 
 6 19 H. 452, Dred Scott i;. Sandford 
 
 STKADER V. GKAHAM, 18 H. 603. 
 
 Supreme Court; dismissal for I a 9 Wall. 566, Hornthalli) Collector 
 want of jurisdiction; costs, a \ 
 STKADEK, SMYTH v. See Smyth v. Strader. 
 STRATTON v. JARVIS, 8 P. 11. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals in ad- 
 miralty ; separate interests ; amount 
 in controversy, a 
 
 Only appellant can assign error. 6 
 
 11 H. 525, Spear v. Place. 
 
 12 II. 352, Eioh u. Lambert. 
 17 H. 4, Sliields v. Thomas. 
 12 Wall. 135, Mail Co.)) Flanders 
 91 U. S. 306, The D. R. Martin. 
 94 U. S. 599, Stephen Morgan. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 148, Paving u. Mulford. 
 
 STRAUDEK V. "WEST VIRGLNTA, 100 U. S. 303. 
 
 867. 
 
 Constitution ; fourteenth amend- 
 ment ; juries ; discrimination against 
 colored race ; removals, a 
 
 STRAWBBIDGE v. CURTISS, 3 Cr. 
 
 U. S. courts ; citizenship ; cor- 
 porations, a 
 
 Formal parties, b 
 
 Jurisdiction under sec. 11, judi- 
 ciary act; suits between citizens of 
 different States, c 
 
 STRINGER V. YOUNG, 3 P. 320. 
 
 Land titles; patents; force of. a 
 
 See Brown v. Strode. 
 See Dutton v. Strong. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 321, Virginia v. Rives. 
 a 100 U. S, 345, ex parte Vh-ginia. 
 
 a 2 H. 550, R. R. Co. v. Letaon. 
 
 6 18 H. 468, Wood v. Davis. 
 
 c 11 Wall. 174, Coal Co. v. Blatch- 
 
 ford. 
 c 18 Wall. 574, Sew. Ma. Co. Case, 
 c 93 U. S. 205, Ober v. Gallagher. 
 
 a 6 P. 340, Bnardman v. Reed. 
 
 STRODE, BROWN v. 
 STRONG, DUTTON v, 
 
 STRONG, ROCK CREEK v. See Rock Creek v. Strong, 
 STRONG, SPAKKOW T. See Sparrow i). Strong. 
 STROTHER v. LUCAS, 6 P. 768. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; law 
 
 and equity must be kept separate, a 
 Evidence; handwriting. 6 
 
 a 21 H. 482, Fenn v. Holme. 
 /) 12 Wall. 321, Rogers v. Ritter. 
 
282 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 STBOTHER v. LUCAS, 12 P. 487. 
 
 llisnomer. a 
 
 Missouri land tatles; grant by stat- 
 ute. 6 
 
 Complete titles; not afected by 
 cession of territory ; contirmations 
 by act of Congress, c 
 
 Enurement. d 
 
 STROUT V. rOSTBB, 1 H. 89. 
 
 Collision ; when each party must 
 bear own loss, a 
 Vessels at anchor. 6 
 
 STUARX T. I/AIRD, 1 Cr. 899. 
 
 Constitution ; contemporaneous 
 construction, a 
 
 STUART V. MAXWEIil,, 16 H. 158. 
 
 Eevenup ; tariff September 1], 
 3841, (5 St. 463,) and 1842. (5 St. 
 56.5.) a 
 
 Acts are to be read together. 6 
 
 STUMP, DEiyEALE V. See Deneale v. Stump. 
 STUBGES V. COLLECTOR, 18 WaU. 19. 
 
 Duties on goods Imported from i a 101 U. S. 790, Powers i>. Comley. 
 '•beyond Cape of Good Hope." a \ 
 
 a 14 P. 326, Games ». Stiles. 
 6 2 H. 372, Chonteau v. Ekhart. 
 c 9 H. 443, Doe v. Bslava. 
 c 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile, 
 c ]0 Wall. 242, Horiisby «. U. S. 
 c 14 Wall. 312, Dent«. Emmerger. 
 c 19 Wall. 141, Carp'nteruRannels 
 d 22 Wall. 262, Connoyerw. Schaef- 
 
 fer. 
 c 93 U. S. 84, Ryan v. Carter. 
 
 a 14 H. 534, Stalnback v. Eae. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 14, The Clarita. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 315, Virginia Ehrman. 
 
 a 16 P. 608, Prigg v. Pennsylvania. 
 a 12 H. 311, Cooley «. B'd Wardens 
 
 a 23 Wall. 881, Smythe ii. Fiske. ' 
 b 96 U. S. 73, Tenn. v. Sneed. 
 6 96 U. S. 117, Arthur v. Lahey. 
 a 96 U. S. 120, Arthur ». Unkart. 
 
 STURGBS V. CBOWNrNSHIELD, 4 
 
 Constitution ; power of States to 
 pass bankrupt laws; release of debts 
 contracted previous to discharge, 
 when void as impairing obligation 
 of contract, a 
 
 Abolition of imprisonment for 
 debt, b 
 Concurrent powers, c 
 Remedy may be changed, d 
 Statutes of limitations, e 
 
 STURGIS V. BOTER, 84 H. 117. 
 
 Admiralty ; maritime lien ; colli- 
 sion, a 
 Collision with tug or tow. 6 
 Liability of the vessels to third 
 party for injury, c 
 
 Wi. 191. 
 
 a 4 Wh. 213, McMillan !J. McNeil. 
 a 6 Wh. 1,34, Mech.Banku. Smith. 
 a 12 Wh. 254, Ogden v. Saunders. 
 h 12 Wh. 374, Mason v. Haile. 
 6 9 P. 355, Beers v. Haiighton. 
 a 14 P. 72, Suj'dam v. Broadnax. 
 c 14 P. 561, Holmes v. Jennison. 
 c 16 P. 608, Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 
 c 5 H. 307, Cook v. Moffat. 
 c 5 H. 573, License Cases. (Opip. 
 
 Taney, C. J. 
 d 6 H. 318, Plant. Bank v. Sharp, 
 c 7 H. 392, Passen. Cases. (Opin. 
 
 McLean, J.) 
 c 12 H. 311, Cooley v. Board Ward. 
 a 1 Wall. 228, Baldwin v. Hale.> 
 a 4 Wall. 551, Van Hoffman v. 
 
 Quincy. 
 d95 U. S. 170, R. R. Co. o. Hecht. 
 e 95 U. S. 633, Terry v. Anderson. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 643, The Belfast. 
 
 6 12 Wall. 44, Tlic Maria Martin. 
 
 b 14 Wall. 213, The Mabey. 
 
 6 23 Wall. 11, The Clarita. 
 
 6 92 U. S. 438, The America. 
 
 c 93 U. S. 318, The Atlas. 
 
 6 97 U. S. 313, Virginia Ehrman. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 283 
 
 STUKGIS V. CLOUGH, 1 Wall. a78. 
 
 Collision ; vessel sunk and raised; 
 damages, a 
 
 SriTOLK CO. V. HATDEN, 3 WaU. 318. 
 
 a 8 "Wall. 387, The Baltimore. 
 
 Patent law; licenses, a 
 Infringement ; damages. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 617, Packet v. Sickles. 
 I 6 93 U. S. 70, Birdsallv. Coolidge 
 
 a 100 U. S. 52, FairHeld v Gallatin 
 6 101 U. S. 627, Jones v. Guar. Co. 
 
 SUFFOUK INS. CO., "WTLtlAMS v. See Williams d. Suffolk Ins. Co. 
 StJIXrVAN V. FUITON STKAMBOAT CO., 6 Wli. 450. 
 
 U. S. courts; facts giving juris- I a 9 Wall. 565, Hornthall v. CoU'r. 
 diction must be averred, o | a 12 Wall. 135, Mail Co. «. Flanders 
 
 SUtnVAN V. POBTLAinj K. B. CO., 94 U. S. 806. 
 
 Equity; laches, a | a 95U.S.160, BrownwBuenaVista 
 
 I a 96 U. S. 257, McLean v. Fleming. 
 
 SULirVANT, SrCORMICK V. See M'Cormick v. SuUivant. 
 SUaOIEBS, KNOX V. See Knox v. Summers. 
 StnuCSEB V. HICKS, 2 Bl. 532. 
 
 .U. S. courts ; obligatory force of 
 State decisions, a 
 
 Deeds; subsequent consideration 
 will validate. 6 
 
 SUMBAIX, TOWTfSIiEY v. See Townsley v. Sumrall. 
 
 SCNNTSIDE, THE, 91 IT. S. 805. 
 
 Collision ; sailing vessels and 
 steamers, a 
 
 Wiien damages apportioned. 6 
 
 Rules of navigation, c 
 SCPEBVISOBS, BANK v. See Bank ■«. Supervisors. 
 SUPEBVISOBS V. DITEANT, 9 Wall. 415. 
 
 U. S. courts ; mandamus to com- I a 98 U. S. 398, U. S. v. N. Orleans, 
 pel levy of tax to pay judgment, a I 
 
 SCPEBVISOBS, KEmsICOTT -v. See Kennioott u. Supervisors. 
 SUPEBVISOBS, NUGENT v. See Nugent v. Supervisors. 
 SUPEBVISOBS, OICOTT v. See Olcott v. Supervisors. 
 SUPEBVISOBS V. BOGEKS, 7 Wall. 175. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 697, The Colorado. 
 6 93 U. S. 319, The Atlas. 
 c 93 U. S. 406, The Hasbrouk. 
 
 U. S. courts ; power to order levy 
 of tax to pay judgment, a 
 
 SUPEBVISOBS V. SCHENCK, 5 WaU. 784. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- a 9 Wall. 414, 
 
 roads; recitals; estoppel; bona- 6 10 Wall. 645, 
 
 flde purchasers, a a]3 Wall. 305, 
 
 Corporations ; estoppel. 6 a 14 Wall. 296, 
 
 a 16 W^ll. 666, 
 a92U. S.491. 
 o 94 U. S. 206; 
 a 96 U. S. 314, 
 
 a 19 Wall. 117, Eees v. Watertown. 
 a 93 U. S. 264, Barkley v. Comr's. 
 a 98 U. S. .398, U. S. v. IS. Orleans. 
 
 Mayor v. Lord. 
 Mel- Bank u St Bank 
 Pendleton v. Amy. 
 Lexington v Butler 
 St. Joseph jjKogers 
 Coloma V. Eaves. 
 Com'rs V. January. 
 San Antonio v. 
 Maheffy. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 278, Macon v. Shores. 
 
 h 99 U. S. 96, Hackett v. Ottovva 
 
'284 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 StTPERVISOBS V. U. S., 4 Wall. 444 
 
 Municipal bmlds in aid of rsiil- 
 roarls; levy of tax for payment; 
 mandamus, a 
 
 Power of Legislature to repeal 
 tax law. h 
 
 ■ Municipal corporations; liability 
 for negligence, c 
 SCPERVISOBS V. V. S., 18 Wall. 83 
 
 U. S. courts; obligatory force of 
 State decisions, a 
 
 STTPERVISOBS 
 SUPERVISORS, 
 
 fls 5 Wall. 708, Galena v. Amy. 
 6 6 Wall. 194, Riggs v. Johnson. 
 a U Wall. 482, WalkleyKMnsciitine 
 a 9 Wall. 417, Supv'rs v. Dnraiit. 
 a 19 Wall. 657, Heine v. Com'rs. 
 c 91 U. S. 551, Barnes v. Dist. Col. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 639, Davie v. Briggs. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 686, Douglass v. Pike. 
 WEI1I.S V. See Wells v. Supervisors. 
 WEST WIS. R. R. V. See West Wis. E. E. v. SuperTisora. 
 
 STJRGETT, EORD v. See Ford v. Surgett. 
 SUBGETT V. LAPICB, 8 H. 64. 
 
 Louisiana ; appeals and writs of 
 eri-or. u I 
 
 StrSSFIELD, ARTHUR v. See Arthur v. Sussfield. 
 SUTHERLAND, WATSON v. See Watson 11. Sutlierland. 
 SUTTER, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Sutter. 
 SUYDAM V. BBOADNAX, 14 P. 75. 
 
 Insolvent debtors ; discharge f i-om 
 prison ; act of 1800. a 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction cannot 
 be limited by State legisliition. 6 
 
 Effect of pendency of proceed- 
 ing in Pi'obate Court. 
 
 Discharge under State insolvent 
 law; debts due citizens of other 
 States, d 
 
 SUYDAM V. WTLMAMSON, 80 H. 488 
 
 Supreme Court; how errorsshould 
 be made to appear, a 
 
 Error in overruling or sustaining 
 demurrers, b 
 
 When writ of error lies, c 
 
 Special verdicts, d 
 
 Writ of error to State court; 
 dismissal for want of jurisdiction, e 
 
 Effect of writ of error, f 
 
 Error not properly appearing, 
 judgment will be afflrined. g 
 
 Jury trial ; waiver ; agreed state- 
 ment of facts, h 
 
 a 12 Wall. 442, Walker v. Dreville, 
 
 a 2 H. 13, McNnttu. Bland. 
 6 18 H. 504, Union Bank i>. Jolly, 
 6 20 H. 173, Hyde v. Stone, 
 c 23 H. 106, Green v. Crcighton. 
 d 1 Wall. 232, Baldwin ». Hale. 
 & 7 Wall. 430, Payne v. Hook. 
 b 13 Wall. 286, R.B. Co. v Whittoii 
 
 a 21 H. 87, Kelsey w. Forsyth. 
 a 21 H. 226, Campbell v. Boyreau, 
 
 2 Bl. 484, Tavlor w. Morton. 
 1 Wall. 600, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 
 3 Wall. 661, Rogers w.Burl'gton 
 
 5 Wall. 675, Thompsons. RIggs. 
 
 6 Wall. 187, Riggs v. Johnson. 
 6 Wall. 433, Miiraford u WardcU 
 6 Wall. 729, Williamson ». Siiy- 
 
 dam. 
 
 8 Wall. 356, Young v. Martin. 
 
 9 Wall. 429, Flanders v. Tweecl. 
 e 10 Wall. 261, R. R. Co. u Morgan 
 /lO Wall. 291, Slaughter -Ho use 
 
 Cases. 
 g 11 Wall. 677, Cork v. Burnley. 
 a 12 Wall. 141, The Eutaw. 
 h 12 Wall. 281, Kearney v. Case, 
 e 13 Wall. 263. Klinger w. Missomi. 
 h 14 Wall. 53, Henderson's Spirits 
 h 15 Wall. 437, Richmond v. Smith 
 6 16 Wall. 886, Ins. Co. v. Piaggio. 
 g 23 Wall. 163, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 a 91 U. S. 130, B. R. ». Trustees, 
 c 91 U. S. 527, Gould v. R. B. Co. 
 h 92 U. S. 473, Tyng v. Grinnell. 
 a 94 U. S. 77, Storm v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 285 
 
 SUYDAM V. WILIilAMSON, 34 H. 427. 
 
 U. S. courts ; when tlwy follow 
 the decisions of State courts as rules 
 of property, a 
 
 SWAIN V. SEAMANS, 9 WaU. 873. 
 
 Equitable estoppel, a 
 
 a 6 Wall. 73G, Williamson v Suj-- 
 
 dam. 
 a 18 Wall. 82, Supervisors u.U.S. 
 a 93 U. S. 207, Oberw. Gallagher. 
 a 97 U. S. 638, Davie v. Brigg:». 
 a 100 U. S. 5.5, Fairfield u Gallatin . 
 a 102 U. S. 65.5, Barrett u. Holmes. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 351. Scholey v. Kovv. 
 a 92 U. S. 85, O'Brien v. Weld. 
 a 93 TJ. S. 130. County v Em. Co. 
 a 96 U. S. 29, Jones u. U. S 
 a 98 U. S. 238, Andrae v Kedfield 
 a 100 U. S. 529, Mt. Pleasant v. 
 Beckvvith. 
 
 STVANN, ALEXANDRIA CANAL CO. v. See Alexandria Canal Co. v. Swann. . 
 SWANN, BANK OF AIiEXANDBIA v. See Bank of Alexandria v. Swann. 
 SWANN, BBOWN v. See Brown v. Swann. 
 SWABTOUT, ELLIOTT v. See Elliott v. Swartout. 
 SWABTOUT V. GIHON, 3 H. 110. 
 
 Collectors; suit to recover back 1 a 4 H. 331, EanUln v. Hoyt. 
 taxes; protest, a 1 
 
 SWAETOtJT, TRACT v. See Tracy v. Swartout. 
 SWATZE T. BUEKE, 1» P. 11. 
 
 Deeds; fraud; avoidance, a 
 
 SWEENY T. EASTER, 1 Wall. 166. 
 
 Negotiable paper; drafts with 
 
 bills of lading "for collection." a 
 SWEENY V. U. S., 17 W^all. 77. 
 U. S.; compromise of claim, a 
 
 SWIFT, HANNIBAL B. B. CO 
 
 SWIFT T. THYSON, 16 P. 1. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; due diligence ; 
 notice, a 
 
 U. S. courts; force of State de- 
 cisions; sec. 34 of act of 1789. 6 
 
 Eights of bona-fide holders of 
 negotiable paper, c 
 
 Note received as security for pre- 
 existing debt ; valuable considera- 
 tion ; usual course of trade, d 
 
 a 19 H. 324, Field v. Seabury. 
 
 a 91 II. S. 97, Nat. Bank u. Bank. 
 
 I a 92 U. S. 389, Savage v. U. S. 
 See Hannibal E. E. Co. i). Swift. 
 
 6100 
 cil02 
 
 H. 445, Lawrence v. McCal- 
 
 mbnt. 
 H. 471, Lane v. Vick. 
 H. 145, Kussell v. Southard. . 
 H. 517, Watson ». Tarpley. 
 H. 356, Goodman v. Simonds. 
 H. 108, Bank v. Neal. 
 Wall. 121, Murray v. Lardner 
 Wall. 785, Supv'rs v. Schenck 
 Wall. 584, Butz v. Muscatine, 
 Wall. 550, Bank v. Eldred. 
 Wall. 548, Boyce v. Tabb. 
 Wall. 166, Sawyer v. Prickett 
 Wall. 322, Chambers!). Clews 
 U. S. 453, Townsend v. Todd 
 U. S. 757, Collins v. Gilbert.. 
 U. S. 481, Brown v. Spofford 
 U. S. 246, Gates «. Nat. Bank 
 U. S. 23, K. E. Co. V. Bank. 
 
 SWOBMBTEDT, SMITH v. See Smith u. Swormstedt. 
 
286 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 SYRACUSE, THE, 18 Wall. 173. 
 
 Collision ; Supreme Court will i a 94 U. S. 603, The Stephen Morgan 
 only reverse in clear case, a \ 
 
 TAGGABT, CALIIWEI<I< v. See OaldweU v. Taggart. 
 
 TAGGEBT, BATTIN T. See Battin v. Taggert. 
 
 TAINTOR, TATIOB T. See Taylor v. Taiator. 
 
 TALBOT, BECKWITH v. See Becfcwitli v. Talbot. 
 
 TALBOT T. JANSEN, 3 Ball. 133. 
 
 Prize ; illegal captures ; priva- | a 1 Wh. 252, L'Invincible. 
 
 teers ; covering prize, a 
 
 TALBOT, McCOBMICK v. See McOormlok v. Talbot. 
 
 TALBOT V. SEAMAN. See Amelia, The. 
 
 TALCOTT, tiNE GBOYE v. See Pine Grove v. Talcott. 
 
 TAPPAN T. MERCHANTS' NATIONAL BANK, 19 WaU. 604. 
 
 Taxation ; uniformity, a | a 92 U. S. 612, St. E. R. Tax Cases. 
 
 TAEKINGTON, BROWN -r. See Brown i>. Tarkington. 
 TABPLEY, WATSON v. See Watson v. Tarpley. 
 TARTER V. KEACH, IS W^aU. 67. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court; Federal questions 
 growing out of the civil war. a 
 
 TARTER T. TARTER, 9 P. 180. 
 
 Wills; setting aside probate ; jii- 
 l-isdiction of U. S. courts, a 
 
 a 92 U. S. 130. Rockhold v. Rock- 
 hold. 
 a 92 IT. S. 287, Ins. Co. v. Hendren 
 a 98 U. S. 333, Bank v. McVeigh. 
 
 o 2 H. 640, Gaines v. Chew. 
 
 a 18 H. 471, Fouvergne ». N. Orl. 
 
 a 22 H. 488, Adams v. Preston. 
 
 TATHAM, LE ROT v. See Le Eoy v. Tatham. 
 TATXOE T. MERCHANTS' INS. CO., 9 H. 405. 
 
 a 17 H. 455, Stevens v. Gladding. 
 6 19 H. 318, Ins. Co. b. Un. Ins. Co. 
 c 94 U. S. 45, Utley ». Donaldson. 
 d 94 U. S. 631, Eames v. Ins. Co. 
 
 Equity ; general relief, o 
 
 Corporations; powers of agents.6 
 
 Sale of personal property ; when 
 complete, c 
 
 Insurance ; when complete, d 
 TATLOE, RIGGS v. See Eigga ■». Tayloe. 
 TATLOE V. RIGGS, 1 P. 591. 
 
 Parol testimony, a \a 5 H. 288, Phillips o. Preston. 
 
 Secondary evidence. 6 | 6 14 H. 260, De Lane v. Moore. 
 
 TAYLOE T. SANDIFORD, 7 Wh. 13. 
 
 Application of payments, a | a 5 P. 305, Page «. Patton. 
 
 TAYLOE V. THOMPSON, 5 P. 370. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a I a 10 P. 450, Voorhees «, Bank U. S. 
 
 Maryland ; judgment hens. 6 | 6 7 H. 764, MassingiU v. Downs. 
 
 TAYLOR, EX PARTE, 14 H. 3. 
 
 Supreme Court ; mandamus, a | a 101 U. S. 720, ex parte R. R. Co. 
 
 TAYIOR, BEATER v. See Beaver v. Taylor. 
 TAYLOR V. BENHAM, 6 H. )869. 
 
 Equitable conversions, a | a 19 Wall. 174, Cropley v. Cooper. 
 
 TAYLOR, BODLEY v. See Bodley v. Taylor. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 287 
 
 TAYLOR T. BROWN, 5 Cr. 834. 
 
 Virginia land laws, a 
 
 Patent ; what omissions cured 
 by. h 
 
 Obligatory force of decisions of 
 State courts, c 
 
 TATLOR V. CARRTT,, 80 H. 683. 
 
 Conflict of inrisdiction ; State i a 24 H. 454. Freeman v. Howe 
 
 a 3 Wli. 595, Craig v. Radford. 
 6 3 P. 3;ie. Stringer v. Young, 
 c 6 P. 291, Green v. Neal. 
 
 and Federal courts, a 
 
 Admiralty; jurisdiction over for- 
 eigners. 6 
 
 Attacbment of vessel by State 
 court; not a proceeding in admi- 
 ralty, c 
 
 Proceedings in rem ; seizures, d 
 
 a 2 Wall. 402, The Slavers. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 340, Burk v. Colbath. 
 
 a G Wall. 197, Eiggs v. .Johnson. 
 
 6 9 Wall. 45?, I'he M. Hammond. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 716. Watson v. Jone>. 
 
 c 15 Wall. 384, Penny wit v. Eaton. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 370, Taylor w. Taintor. 
 
 a 19 Wall. 223, Ins. Co. v. Dunn. 
 ' a 20 Wall. 392, N. Orl. v. S. S. Co. 
 : a 22 Wall. 253, French v. Hay. 
 i d 23 Wall. 464, The Rio Grande. 
 TATX.OR, CONTfElT v. See Connely ■o. Taylor. 
 TATTLOR, EtMEKDORF v. See Elmendorf v. Taylor. 
 TATLOR, KEARNEY v. See Kearney v. Taylor. 
 TAYLOR V. LONGWORTH, 14 P. 174. 
 
 Equity; specific performance; 
 when time is of the essence of con- 
 tract, a 
 
 Error; waiver of objections. & 
 
 TAYLOR, McFERRAN t. See McFerran v. Taylor. 
 TAYLOR, Mcknight v. see McKnight v. Taylor. 
 TAYLOR T. MASON, 9 'Wll. 385. 
 
 Wills ; devises on conditions I a 14 H. 496, Webster v. Cooper, 
 subsequent, a \ 
 
 TAYLOR V. MORTON, 8 Bl. 484. 
 
 Supreme Court ; will generally 
 affirm when error is not properly 
 shown, a 
 
 a 20 H. 507, Ahl v. Johnson. 
 b 22 Wall. 245, French v. Hay. 
 
 TAYLOR V. MYERS, 7 Wll. 83. 
 
 Virginia military lands; with- 
 drawal of wariaiit. a 
 
 a 1 Wall. 604, Ponieroy v. Bank. 
 a 10 Wall. 260, E. R. v. Morgan. 
 a 11 Wall. 676, Cook v. Burnley. 
 a 12 Wall. 141, The Eutaw. 
 a 91 U. S. 131, R. R. v. Trustees. 
 
 a 1 P. 632, Jackson v. Clark. 
 a 4 P. 337, Gait v. Galloway, 
 a 6 P. C72, Lindsey v. Myers. 
 a 7 H. 266, McArthur v. Dunn. 
 
 TAYLOR, PATTON v. See Pattoa v. Taylor. 
 TAYLOR, ROCKENDORF v. See Eookendorf v. Taylor. 
 TAYLOR v. SAVAGE, 1 H. 884. 
 
 Administrator de bonis non ; lia- I o 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benhara. 
 bility. a \ 
 
 TAYLOR, SHEPPARD v. See Sheppard v. Taylor. 
 TAYLOR, STANFORD v. See Stanford v. Taylor. 
 TAYLOR V. TAINTOR, 16 W^aU. 370. 
 
 U. S. courts ; conflict of jurisdic- I a 20 Wall. 392, N. Orl. v. S. S. Co. 
 tion; Slate courts, a 1 a 22 Wall. 253, French «. Hay, 
 
288 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 4 H. 243, Clifton v. U. S. 
 6 4 H. 331, Rankin v. Hoyt. 
 c 3 Wall. 143, CI iqnot Champagne 
 d 3 Wall. 148, Fennersteln Cliam.- 
 
 pagne. 
 e 23 Wall. 380, Symthe v. Fiske. 
 
 TAYIiOK, TEBKETT v. See Terrett v. Taylor. 
 TAYtOB T. tr. S., 3 H. 197. 
 
 Verdict; one good count will 
 support, a 
 
 Collectors of cnstoms; suits 
 against to recover back duties ; act 
 1845. 6 
 
 "Probable cause;" "onus pro- 
 band!." 
 
 Hearsay; invoices by other mer- 
 chants, d 
 
 Eevenue laws ; construction, e 
 
 TAYtOB, WAXKEK T. See Walker v. Taylor. 
 TATLOB, WATSON v. See Watson v. Taylor. 
 TEAIi V. EELTON, 19 H. 893. 
 
 U. S. and State courts; concur- | a 93 U. S. 142, Claflia v. Houseman 
 rent jurisdiction, a I 
 
 TEBBITTS, WBIGHT v. See Wright v. Tebbltts. 
 
 TEESE V. HUNTINGTON, 83 H. 10. 
 
 Patent liiw ; pi'acticc. a 
 " Notice of special matter." 6 
 Infringement; defense of pre- 
 vious invention, c 
 Damages ; counsel fees, d 
 Cross-examination, e 
 
 a 7 Wall. 596, Agagam v. Jordon. 
 6 8 Willi. 427, Blanchard u. Put- 
 nam; 
 6 9 Wall. 739, Wise v. Allis. 
 c 11 Wall. 539, Seymour u Oabonio 
 d 15 Wall. 230, Oelrichs v. Spain. 
 d 15 Wall. 453, Flanders v. Tweed. 
 e 17 Wall. 542, Rea v. Missouri, 
 c 95 U. S. 218, Roemer v. Simon. 
 
 TELEGKAPH, THE. See O'Reilly v. Morse. 
 TJILEGEAPH CO. v. EYSEB, 19 Wall. 435. 
 
 Supersedeas, a | a 93 U. S. 89, Kitchen ». Randolph 
 
 TELEAIE, COOPEE v. See Cooper u. Tellair. 
 TENBEOCK, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Tenbrock. 
 TENNESSEE, COLEMAN v. See Coleman d. Tennessee. 
 TENNESSEE v. DAVIS, 100 V. S. 357. 
 
 Constitution ; power of Congress 
 to autliorizo removal of case ; when 
 a defense arises under the Consti- 
 tution or laws, a 
 
 AmtMidments 13 and 14. 6 
 
 a 100 U. S. 312, Strauder v. W. Va. 
 6 100 U. S. 345, ex parte Virginia. 
 a 102 U. S. 140, R. R. Co. v. Miss. 
 
 TENNESSEE, FAEEINGTON v. See Farrington v. Tennessee. 
 TENNESSEE, HENDEESON v. See Henderson d. Tennessee. 
 TENNESSEE, EAIXBOAD CO. v. See Railroad Co. u. Tennessee. 
 
 TENNESSEE v. SNEED, 96 TJ. S. 69. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- 
 tracts; remedy, a 
 
 a 96 U. S. 637, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 a 97 U. S. 456, Keith v. Clark. 
 a 101 U. S. 438, S. Car. v. Gaillai'il. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 289 
 
 TEBKEXT V. TATL,OR, 9 Cr. 43. 
 
 Kevolntionary war ; effect on 
 civil rights, a 
 
 Vestry; powers. 6 
 
 Constitution ; grant cannot be 
 resiimt'd by Legislature ; obligation 
 of contracts, c 
 
 Title by estoppel, d 
 
 Act of Congress may vest the 
 legal title, e 
 
 Eight of Legislature to modify a 
 charter, f 
 
 a 8 Wh. 4S0, Society v. N. Haven. 
 6 9 Wli. 445. Mason v. Miincaster. 
 c 2 P. 653, Williinson v. Leland. 
 d 4 P. 80, Carver v. Jackson. 
 e 12 P. 294, Galloway v. Fhiley. 
 c 6 H. 332, Plant. Bank v. Sharp, 
 c 10 H. 536, E.Hartf'duBridgeCo. 
 c 16 H. 376, State Bank v. Knoop. 
 c 1 Bl. 373. Rice v. Railroad Co. 
 c 4 Wall. 550, Van Hoffman v. 
 
 Quincey. 
 c 13 Wall. 213, Penn. Coll. Cases. 
 /lo Wall. 4S9, Miller v. State. 
 
 TERKIIi V. AULISON, »1 'Wall. 889. 
 
 Equity ; writs of assistance, a \ a 101 U. S. 849, Howard v. R. R. 
 TEKKILIi, CASE V. See Case v. Terrill. 
 TEBKT V. ANDERSON, 95 r. S. 638. 
 
 Limitations; constitutionality of I a 98 U. S. 252, Gifford v. Helms, 
 acts passed by the Southern States a 99 U.S. 27, Mills v. Scott. 
 on the terminatiop of the war. a \ 
 TEKKT, MFE INS. CO. v. See Life Ins. Co. v. Terry. 
 TERRY V. TUBMAN, 93 U. S. 156. 
 
 Corporations; stockholders ; in- a 95 U. S. 632, Terry u. Anderson 
 dividual liability, a a 99 IT. S. 29, Mills v. Scott. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 213, Hatch v. Dana. 
 TESCHMAKER, TJ. S. v. See U. S. v. Teschmaker. 
 TESSON, GREGG v. See Gregg v. Tesson. 
 TEXAS V. CHII.es, 81 WaU. 488. 
 
 Evidence! of parties in U. S. I a 22 Wall. 350, R. R. v. Pollard, 
 courts, a I 
 
 TEXAS, HUNTINGTON v. See Huntington v. Texas. 
 TEXAS, NAT. BANK v. See Nat. Bank v. Texas. 
 TEXAS V. "WHITE, 7 WaU. 717. 
 
 Civil war ; effect of military oc- 
 cupation, a 
 
 Contracts in aid of the rebellion 
 void. 6 
 
 What acts of States in rebellion 
 valid and what void, c 
 
 Negotiable paper overdue ; pur- 
 chase of. d 
 
 19 
 
 9 Wall. 
 12 Wall. 
 
 6 12 Wall. 
 
 133, The Grapeshot. 
 
 845, Hannaner v Wood- 
 ruff. 
 
 357, Thomas v. Rich- 
 mond. 
 6 12 Wall. 534, Legal Tender Cas. 
 c 16 Wall. 225, Davis v. Gray, 
 c 16. Wall. 410, Huntington v Tex. 
 b 20iWaJl. 82, Nat. Bank «. Tex. 
 6 20 Wall. 464, Sprott v. U. S. 
 d 21 Wall. 145, Vermilyew. Adams 
 e 22 Wall.. 102, U. S. v. Ins. Co. 
 d 22^ Wall. 165, In re Chiles. 
 6, 22 Wall. 490i Taylor v. Thomas. 
 c 91iU. S. 596,. Boiling v.Lersner 
 6, 96.U..S- 195, Dewing v. Perdic- 
 
 aries. 
 \o 97 TJ. S. 460. Keith v. Clark. 
 6 99 U. S. 190; Ketchum v. Buck- 
 ley, 
 c 102 U. S. 418, Daniels u.Tearney 
 
290 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 410, HiTnt.ino;ton» Texas 
 a 20 Wall. 83, If at. Bank v. Texas. 
 
 TEXAS V. HARDENBUBG, 10 ■Wall. 
 
 State bonds ; invalidity without 
 indorsement ; acts in aid of the re- 
 bellion void, o 
 THATCECEB, McANDREWS v. See McAndrews «. Thatcher. 
 THATCHER, MATHEW T. See Mayhew v. Thatcher. 
 THATCHER T. POWEM,, 6 Wh. 187. 
 
 U. S. courts ; force of State decis- i a 12 Wh. 161, Jackson v. Chew, 
 ions, a i a 6 P. 292, Green v. Neal. 
 
 Tax titles. 6 I o 4 H. .51, Beals v. Hale. 
 
 Deeds ; when party claiming 
 under must show performance, c 
 
 6 9 H. 256, Mason v. Fearson. 
 
 6 16 H. 615, Early v. Doe. 
 
 c 2 Wall. 319, Ransom B.Williams 
 
 THATER, JOHNSON CO. v. See Johnson Oo. v. Thayer. 
 THEi:.I.rSON V. SMITH, 8 Wh. 426. 
 
 Priority of U. S. a I a 1 P. 434, Conard v. Ins. Co. 
 
 I a 92 U. S. 623, Lewis v. U. S. 
 
 THTBTT HOGSHEADS OF SUGAR v. BOYIE, 9 Cr. 195. 
 
 Maritime jurisdiction ; prize, a 
 Title to conquered territory; 
 when it vests. 6 
 
 THOMAS, BAI.I.ARD v. See Ballard v. Thomas. 
 
 THOMAS, BRADSTREET v. See Bradstreet D. Thomas. 
 
 THOMAS, DANFORTH v. See Danforth i). Thomas. 
 
 THOMAS v. HARVIE, 10 Wh. 146. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 393, The Siren. 
 
 b 16 Wall. 434, U. S. ». Hnckabee. 
 
 Equity ; limitation ^ laches, a 
 Rehearing discretionary, h 
 Bills of review, c 
 
 a 10 Wh. 157, Elmendorfi) Taylor 
 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 
 6 14 Wall. 22, Steines u. Franklin. 
 
 c 100 U. S. 107, Ricker ». Powell. 
 THOMAS, MARTIN v. See Martin v. Thomas. 
 
 THOMAS, MECH. & TRAD. BANK v. See Mech. & Trad. Bank v. Thomas. ' 
 THOMAS V. OSBORN, 19 H. 39. 
 
 Admiralty; liens of material- 
 men, a 
 
 Ships; owners '■'■pro hac vice." b 
 Hypothetication of vessel, c 
 
 a 9 Wall. 138, The Grapeshot. 
 
 o 10 Wafl. 203, The Lulu. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 209, The Kalorama. 
 
 6 12 Wall. 416, Thorp v. Hammond 
 
 a 20 Wall. 164, Ins. Co. v. Baring. 
 
 c 96 U. S. 649, Ins. Co. v. Gosszler 
 THOMAS, RTAN v. See Byan v. Thomas. 
 THOMAS, SCHTJYXER CO. T. See Schuyler Co. ». Thomas. 
 THOMAS, SCOTLAND CO. v. See Scotland Co. v. Thomas. 
 THOMAS, SHIEI.DS v. See Shields v. Thomas. 
 THOMAS V. WOODBIDGE, 83 'Wall. 888. 
 
 Supreme Court ; motions to dis- 1 a 94 U. S. 493, Clark v. Hancock, 
 miss ; when made, a \ 
 
 THOMAS GIBBONS, THE, 8 Or. 481. 
 
 Prize ; war of 1812 ; instructions I a 9 Cr. 139, The Mary, 
 of President, a 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 291 
 
 THOMAS JEFFERSON, THE, 10 'WTl, 
 
 Maritime contracts ; admiralty 
 jm'isdiction. a 
 
 Flow of ebb and tide. 5 
 
 Above case overruled, c 
 
 Navigable streams ; public high- 
 ways, d 
 
 THOMPSON V. DEAN, 7 WaU. 344, 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 
 . 4^8. 
 
 a 10 P. 108, Hobart ». Drogan. 
 a 11 P. 175, Orleans v. Phoebus, 
 a 5 H. 452, Waring ». Clarke, 
 a 6 H. 378. N. J. Nav. Co.i). Bank. 
 6 12 H. 450. Gon. Chief v. Fitzhugh 
 c 20 H. 297. Jackson v. Magnolia. 
 c 4 Wall. 562. The Hine & Trevor 
 d 7 Wall. 288, K. R. v. Schurmier. 
 a 7 Wall. 637, The Belfast.. 
 a 21 Wall. 554, Edwards ». Elliott. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 577, R. E. e. Bradleys. 
 a 12 Wall. 98, French v. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 a 22 Wall. 245, French v. Hay. 
 
 THOMPSON, DODDRIDGB V. See Doddridge ■». Thompson. 
 THOMPSON, GAINES v. See Gaines v. Thompson. 
 THOMPSON, GKEELEY-v. See Greeley ii. Thompson. 
 THOMPSON, GRIFFIN v. See Qriffln v. Thompson. 
 THOMPSON, HILI, V. See Hill v. Thompson. 
 THOMPSON T, LEE CO., 3 WaU. 330. 
 
 County and municipal subscrip- a 4 Wall, 
 tions in aid of railroads; power of 
 
 the Legislatures to authorize, a 6 5 Wall. 
 
 Bona-fide holders of bonds issued c 7 Wall, 
 
 for purpose not authorized, b d 7 Wall. 
 
 Interest; coupons, c e 12 Wall. 
 
 Ratification by Legislature, d / 14 Wall. 
 
 Municipal corporations; powers, e d 16 Wall. 
 
 Negotiability of bonds. . / c 20 Wall. 
 
 274, Mitchell ». Burling- 
 ton. 
 784, Sup'vrs v. Schenck. 
 105, Aurora v. West. 
 624, Beloit v. Morgan. 
 353, ThomasuRichmond 
 293, Lexington v Butler 
 663, Si. Joseph v Rogers 
 589, Clark v. lawa. 
 
 THOMPSON, KING v. See King v. Thompson. 
 THOMPSON, MAGNIAC v. See Magniac v. Thompson. 
 THOMPSON, MEAD V. See Mead v. Thompson. 
 THOMPSON V. RAIXROAD CO., 6 WaU. 136. 
 
 U. S. courts; law 
 must be kept distinct. 
 
 and 
 a 
 
 equity 
 
 THOMPSON V. RIGGS, 6 WaU. 678. 
 
 Banks ; general deposits, a 
 
 Damages for failure to pay ; value 
 of moneys, h 
 
 Usages, e 
 
 Courts of District of Columbia; 
 practice; appeals, d 
 
 d 93 U. S, 
 c 100 U. S, 
 
 THOMPSON, SHDTTK v. See Shutte v. Thompson. 
 THOMPSON, TATTLOE v. See Tayloe D. Thompson. 
 
 d 12 Wall. 442, Walker o. Dreville. 
 a 99 U. S. 380, Van Norden v Mor- 
 ton. 
 alOOU. S.103, Hurt«Hollirtgsw'th 
 
 6 Wall. 609, Soc.forSav.»Coito 
 10 Wall. 155, Bank ■e. Millard. 
 
 16 Wall. 503, Plan. Bank » Bank 
 
 17 Wall. 122, OultonB. Sav. Inst. 
 23 Wall. 503, Moran v. Pratlier. 
 
 91 U. S. 134, R. R. V. Trustees. 
 
 92 U. S. 370, Scammon c. Kim- 
 ball. 
 
 555, Stanton u.Embrey 
 692, Bank v. Burkhardt 
 
292 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 THOMPSON T. TOLMIE, H P. 157. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a a 6P. 730. U. S. u. Arredonclo. 
 
 a lOP. 469, VooiheesiiBankU.S. 
 
 a 16 P. 81, Cocke v. Hiilsey. 
 
 a 2 H. 3.'?5, Grignon v. Astor. 
 
 a 18 H. 497, Beauregard v K. Orl. 
 
 a 22 H. 11, Parker v. Kane. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 345. Harvey v. Tyler. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 316, Cooper w Reynolds 
 
 a 102 U. S. 464, Hall v. Law. 
 
 THOMPSON V. tnsnON PACIFIC B. B. CO., 9 Wall. 579. 
 
 Constitution; State taxation of I a 18 Wall. 32, R. B.Co.u.Peniston 
 agency of the U. S. o I 
 
 THOMPSON T. WHITMAN, 18 Wall, 
 
 Jurisdiction ; want of service, a 
 
 497. 
 
 THOBNHTLI., MOBGAN v. 
 
 THOBINGTON v. SMITH, 8 WaU. 1. 
 
 Contract; consideration; Confed- 
 erate money, a 
 
 What acts of Confederate States 
 valid. 6 
 
 Extrinsic evidence, c 
 
 Whether Confederacy was a gov- 
 ernment do facto, d 
 
 PajTuents ; meaning of the word 
 "dollars." e 
 
 a 19 Wall. 61, Kuowles v. Gus Co. 
 a 21 Wall. 454, Hill ». Mendenhall. 
 a 91 U. S. 165, Hall v. Lanning. 
 a 95 U. S. 730, Pennoyer v. STeff. 
 See Morgan r. Thomhill. 
 
 THOBNTON v. CABSON, 7 Cr. 597. 
 
 Awards ; arbitrators, a 
 Whether writ of error lies on 
 awards. 6 
 
 THOBNTON V. WENN, 1 Wh. 183. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice ; waiver 
 
 by indorser. a 
 Failure of consideration. 6 
 Warranty ; remedy of purchaser 
 
 for breach, c 
 
 665, Delmas v. Ins. Co. 
 442, Haiiauer v. Wood- 
 raff. 
 555, Confed. Note Case 
 3, Wll. R.R.J). King. 
 596, Boiling v. Lersner 
 435, Stewart v Salamon 
 
 31, Reed v. Ins. Co. 
 184, Williams ». Bruffy 
 587, Bissell v. Hayward 
 
 64, U. S. V. Peck. 
 
 a 18 H. 248, York R. R. v. Myers. 
 6 2 Wall. 130, Heckers v. Fowler. 
 
 a 12 P. 498, Reynolds v. Douglass. 
 6 9 H. 220, Withers v. Green, 
 c 20 H. 150, Lyon v. Bertram. 
 a 20 H. 173, Hyde v. Stone. 
 a 20 II. 498, Sigerson v. Mathews. 
 
 a 
 
 14 Wall 
 
 a 
 
 15 Wall. 
 
 a 
 
 19 Wall 
 
 a 
 
 91 U. S 
 
 b 
 
 91 U. S 
 
 a 
 
 94 U. S 
 
 c 
 
 95 U. S 
 
 d 
 
 96 U. S 
 
 e 
 
 96 U. S 
 
 c 
 
 102 U. S 
 
 THBASHEB, STACBY v. See Stacey v. Thrasher. 
 THEEDGrLI- V. PINTAED, 18 H. 24,. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 325. Harkriess », 
 
 Estoppel; assignee cannot dis- 
 pute title under which he iiolds. a 
 Land titles ; sale before patent, b 
 
 Underbill 
 6 18 Wall. 314, Lamb v. Davenport 
 6 99 U. S. 22, Hussey v. Smith. 
 
 THBOGMOETON, U. S. v. See U. S. v. Throgmorton. 
 
 THYSON, EA-SMOND t. See Raymond v. Thysou. 
 
 THYSON, SWIFT v. See Swiit o. Thyson. 
 
 TIDE WATEE CANAI. CO., GUB v. See Gue v. Tide Water Oanal Oo. 
 
 TIEBNAN, OWINGS v. See Owings v Tiernan. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 293 
 
 •mVTSY V. BOATMAN INST., 18 TVall. 376. 
 
 Bankruptcy; fraucluletit prefer- 
 <?aces. a 
 
 a 21 Wall. 369. Clark v. Min. 
 a 21 Wall. 480. Fox v. Gardner. 
 a 22 Wall. 178. Burnhisel « Firman 
 
 TUTINT T. LUCAS, 15 WaU. 410. 
 
 Bankruptcy; fraudulent sales, a ] a 16 Wall. 601, Wager v. Hall. 
 TrrriNT, amXEK v. see Mm«r V. Tifflny. 
 TH-aHMAN, MITCHEi:.!, T. See MitcheU v. Tilgliman. 
 TULOTSON, MINOR v. See Minor v. Tillotson. 
 TIIiTON v. COriEI,r», 93 V. S. 163. 
 
 U. S. courts; amendments, a | a 101 U. S. 406, Bank v. Shermau. 
 
 TINGET, V. S. V. See U. S. v. Tingej, 
 
 TIOGA K. B. T. BLOSSBURG R. R., 80 WaU. 137. 
 
 U. S. courts; when bound by the j a 21 Wall. 497, Erie E. R. v. Penn. 
 decisions oE tlie State courts, a \ ■ 
 
 TIPPING, BAILIIT T. See Bailiff d. Tipping. 
 
 TISDAI.E, MUT. BEN. INS. CO. v. See Mut. Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. Tlsdale. 
 
 TITUS T. U. S., ao WaU. 475. 
 
 ■riie civil war; Confederate gov- 1 a 92 U. S. 169, Whitfield o. U. S. 
 cruraent; right to contract, a \ 
 
 TOBY, RA^n>ON V. See Randon v. Toby. 
 
 TODD V. DANIEL3, 16 P. 533. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a' a 6 H. 202, Forgay v. Conrad. 
 Joint decrees, b | 6 20 H. 288, Mussina v. Cavazos. 
 
 j I) 10 Wall. 417, Masterdon »..Hern- 
 
 I don. 
 
 I b 18 WaU. 579, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 
 j b 20 WaU. 157, Simpson v. Gi'eeley 
 
 a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 «15 P. 170, Levy v. Fitzpatrick. 
 b 17 H. 425, Herndon v. Ridgway. 
 6 20 H. 214, Chaffee v. Hayward. i 
 c 20 H. 555, MoCargo v. Chapman. 
 d 1 Wall. 369, Schuehardt v. Allen 
 e 10 Wall. 133, Wiggins « Burkham 
 a 20 Wall. 7, Habich v. Folger. 
 
 TOLAND V. SPBAGUE, 18 P. 300. 
 
 Jurisdiction over the person; 
 waiver, a 
 
 Nou-resident defendants, b 
 
 Final judgments, c 
 
 Whencourtcan direct a verdict, d 
 
 "Reasonable time;" wlien a 
 question for the court, e 
 
 TOIEB, ARMSTRONG v. See Armstrong v. Toler. 
 TOUMIE, THOMPSON v. See Thompson v. Tolmie. 
 
 TOME v. DUBOIS, 6 WaU. 555. 
 
 Instructions to the jury, a 
 Sales ; when title passes. 6 
 
 TOMLINSON V. BRANCH, 15 WaU. 
 
 Constitution ; taxation ; exemp- 
 tion, a 
 
 How affected by consolidation of 
 railroads, b 
 
 I a 16 WaU. 517, Tweed's Case. 
 I 6 100 U. S. 131, Hatch v. Oil Co. 
 
 469. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 42, R.R. Co. v Maguire 
 a 21 Wall. 498, Erie R. R. v. Penn. 
 a 92 U. S. 676, R. R. v. Georgia. 
 a 92 U. S. 682, Branch c.Charl'ton 
 6 94 U. S. 690, Scotland v. Thomas 
 b 94 U. S. 726, R. R. v. Virginia. 
 
294 
 
 MASUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 TOMXINSON V. JESSIIP, 15 WaU. 454. 
 
 Constitution; obligation of con- 
 tracts; exemptions from taxation, a 
 
 Licenses ; revocable. 6 
 
 Legislative control over cliar- 
 ters. c 
 
 a 20 Wall. 42, R. K. v. Maguire. 
 h 94 U. S. 540, Doyle v. Ins. Co. 
 a 9&U. S. 511, B. R. Co. v. Maine. 
 a 99 U. S. 353, Hoge v. B. R. Co. 
 e m U. S. 720, Sinking-Fund Cases 
 
 TOMPKIKS T. WHEELER, 16 P. 106. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; assignments for 
 benefit of creditors ; presumed as- 
 sent, a 
 
 TO or T. MARTIN, 13 WaU. 40. 
 
 Bankruptcy; fraudulent prefer- 
 
 o 8 H. 438, Grove v. Brien. 
 
 TOOI. CO. V. NORRIS, S Wall. 46. 
 
 Illegal contract for Improperly 
 Influencing Legislature, a 
 
 a 16 Wall. 308, Buchanan v. Smith. 
 a 16 Wall. 601, Wager' w. Hall. 
 a 94 U. S. 557, Dtitcher v. Wright. 
 a 95 U. K. 346, Nat. Bank ». Cook. 
 
 a 21 Wall. U9, Trist v. Child. 
 a 93 U. S. 557, Stanton vEmbrey 
 a 101 U. S. Ill, Megaire II Corwine 
 
 TOOMBS, HOKNBUCKXE v. See Hambucklei). Toombs. 
 TOFEKA, XjOAJS ASS. v. See Loan Ass. u. ToiMka. 
 TOBKANCE, MOIXAN v. See MoUan i). Torrance. 
 
 TOWNSENB T. GBEEXET. 6 Wall. 336. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; pu- 
 eblo lands, a 
 
 Confirmations ; to whose benefit 
 they enure, h 
 
 XOWNSEKD V. JAMISON, 9 H. 407. 
 
 Contracts ; by what law govern- I 
 ed; limitations, a I 
 
 TOWNSLEY X. SVMBAU., 8 P. l?*. 
 
 Contracts ;. consideration, a 
 
 Negotiable paper ; rights ol hold- 
 er when taken for pre-existing 
 debt. 6 
 
 Acceptance by parol, c 
 
 TOWSI.ET, JOHNSON v. See Johnson v. Toiwsley. 
 TRABCE, SMITH v. See Smith ». Trabne. 
 TRACY V. HOI4COMBE, 24 H. 486. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 372, Grisar« McDowell 
 a 13 Wall. 388, Alex'der b. Roulct 
 h 13 Wall. 490, Carpentier»Mont- 
 
 gomery. 
 o 98 U. S. 16, Palmer v. Low. 
 alOOU. S. 139, Brownsville uCav- 
 
 azos. 
 a 100 D. S. 255., Trenouth v. San 
 
 Francisco. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 538, Hanger «. Abbott. 
 
 a 15 P. 311, U. S. V. Linn. 
 6 16 P. 14, Swift V. Tyson. 
 a 22 H. 43, Emerson ». Slater. 
 a 22 Wall. 507, Piatt v. U. S. 
 c 91 U. S. 414, Soudder u. Bank. 
 
 Supreme Court ; 
 raents. a 
 
 final judg- 
 
 TRACY V. IRWIN, 18 WaU. 650. 
 
 Tax titles, a 
 
 a IS Wall. 588, Moore ». Bobbins. 
 a 20 Wall. 654, Parcels ». Johnson. 
 a 94 U. S. 517, Davis v. Crouch. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 274, Hampton v. Rouse. 
 a 90 U. S. 1S6, Atwood v. Weems. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 295 
 
 a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 
 6 12 H. 289, Teal v. Pelton. 
 
 c 95 U. S. 238, Ins. Co. v. Rodel. 
 
 TRACT V. SWABTOUT, 10 P. 95. 
 
 Public oflScers ; torts, a 
 
 When protected. 6 
 
 Court (Min direct a verdict, c 
 
 TRANS. CO. V. HOPE, 95 U. S. 897. 
 
 Instructions to tlie jury, a l a 101 U. S. 149, WortliiiiKton v. 
 
 I Mason. 
 
 TRANS. CO., WAIKER v. See 'Walker v. Trans. Co. 
 
 TRAPNAIX,, WOODRUEF v. See Woodruff ». Trapnall. 
 
 TRASK V. MAGUIRE, 18 WaU. 401. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- I a 93 U. S. 224, Morgan v Louisiana 
 tracts ; exemption from taxation, a \ 
 
 TREASURER, ARMSTRONG v. See Armstrong v. Athens Oo. 
 
 TREASURER, INS. CO. v. See Ins. Co. v. Treasurer. 
 
 TREBrLCOCK, UPTON t. See Upton v. Trebilcock. 
 
 TREBIXCOCK V. "WnSON, 18 WaU. 687. 
 
 Payments ; contract to pay in I a 17 Wall. 672, The Emily Souder. 
 gold, a I a 22 Wall. Ill, Maryland v. E. R. 
 
 TREVINO, CAVAZOS v. See Cavazos v. Trevino. 
 
 TRIGG, POSTMASTER-GENERAX v. See Postmaster-General v. Trigg. 
 
 TRIMBI.E, RAILROAD V. See Railroad v. Trimble. 
 
 TRIPI.ETT, BAJSK OF WASH. v. See Bank o£ Washington v. Triplet!. 
 
 TRIST V. CHILD, 81 WaU. 450. 
 
 Attorneys; contingent fees; em- 
 ployment before commissions, a 
 
 Contracts for lobbying and use of 
 influence. 6 
 
 a 91 U. S. 254, Wrights. Tebbets. 
 b 93 U. S. 557, Stanton ».Embrey 
 6 95 IT. S. 682, Farrington wTenn 
 6 101 U. S. Ill, Meguire v Corwine 
 
 TROUT, HOLKEES v. See Holmes v. Trout. 
 
 TROT IRON CO., CORNING v. See Corning v. Troy Iron Oo. 
 
 TROT IRON EACTORT t. CORNING, 14 H. 808. 
 
 Patent law; invention; improve- I a 15 H. 464, Corning ». Iron Factory 
 ment in manufacture of nails, a 
 
 TRULT V. WANZBB, S H. 148. 
 
 Judgments; injunctions against.a 
 
 a 9 H. 311, Humphreys v. Leggett 
 a 17 H. 584, Wanzer v. Truly. 
 a 94 U. S. 659, Crim v. Handley. 
 
 TRULT, WANZER V. See Wanzer v. Truly. 
 TUBMAN, TERRT v. See Terry v. Tubman. 
 TUCKER V. FERGUSON, 88 WaU. 587. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts; exemption from taxation, a 
 
 Construction against tlie privi- 
 lege. 6 
 
 TUCKER, HXLIi V. See Hill v. Tucker. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 595, R, R. v. Sup'rs. 
 a 95 U. S. 686, Farrington v Tenn 
 6 97 U. S. 667, Fertilizing Co. v. 
 
 Hyde Parli. 
 a 100 U. S. 561, Newton v. Com'rs. 
 
296 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DEOISIOSrS. 
 
 TUCKER V,. OXLET, 5 Cr. 34. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of erfor; 
 agreed case, a 
 
 Bankruptcy; partners ; joint 
 creditois ; separate estate. 6 
 
 Set-offs, c 
 TtJEL, TYI.br v. See Tyler v. Tael. 
 TUXIilS, COOK V. See Cook v. Tnllis. 
 TURK, POUND T. See Pound v. Tnrk. 
 TURK, WHITE v. See White v. Turk. 
 TURNER V. BANK OF NORTH AMERICA, 4 Dall, 
 
 U. S. courts; negotiable paper; 
 suits by indorsee ; citizenship ; lltii 
 section judiciary act. a 
 
 Person bringing suit must aver 
 the facts giving the court jurisdic- 
 tion. 6 
 
 a 16 P. 296. U. S. v. Eliason. 
 b Sn.4it, Merrill k. Neill. 
 c 18 Wall. 633, Gray i\ Eollo. 
 
 8. 
 
 a 9 Wh. 538, Mollan v. Turner. 
 a 11 P. 82, Evans v. Gee. 
 a 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston, 
 a G H. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 a 8 H., 448, Sheldon J7. Hill. 
 a 13 H. 186, CoiTee v. Plant. Bank. 
 a 8 Wall. 396, Bradley v. Khines. 
 6 9 Wall. 390, Bushnell v. Ken- 
 nedy. 
 6 9 Wall. 565, Horntiiall v. CoU'r. 
 6 9 Wall. 575, Assessor v. Osborn. 
 b 18 Wall. 577, Sew.Mach.Co.Case 
 a 19 Wall. 83, Morgan v. Gay. 
 
 TURNER, McNITT v. See MoNitt v. Turner. 
 TURNER, PARKS v. See Parks v. Turner. 
 TURNER V. SMITH, 14 Wall. 553. 
 
 Tax titles, a | o 99 U. S. 445, Keeley v. Sanders. 
 
 TURNER, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Turner. 
 TURNER, WAIKER v. See "Walker v. Turner. 
 TURNER V. TATBS, 16 H. 88. 
 
 Bills of exceptions, a o 20 H. 252, U. S. v. Breitling. 
 
 Province of the jury and court; a 20 H. 438, Suydam u. Williamson, 
 proving contract. 6 a 2B1. 568, Dredge ». Forsyth. 
 
 Objection.-! cannot be first taken b 8 Wall. 268. Drakely v. Gregg, 
 in tiie Supreme Court, c c 20 Wall. 41S, Mays v. Pritton. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 555, Stanton v. Embrey. 
 TURPIN, SAWYER v. See Sawyer v. 'furpin. 
 TURRIIili V. R. R. CO., 1 Wall. 508. 
 
 Patent law ; " Cawood " patent 
 for improvement In reforming and 
 welding railroad rails, a 
 
 TUTHILL, SAIiTMARSH v. See Saltmarsh v. Tut Mil. 
 TWEED, FLANDERS v. See Flanders v. Tweed. 
 TWEED, INS. CO. V. See Ins. Co. v. Tweed. 
 TWENTY PER CENT. CASES, 13 WaU. 676. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 695, Cawood Patent. 
 
 Joint resolution of February 28, 
 1867; additional compensation to 
 persons in civil service, a 
 
 TWIN LICK OHi CO. ■ 
 
 Equity; laches, a 
 
 a 20 Wall. 184, Twenty P. Ct. Cas. 
 a 91 U. S. 306, U. S. v. Allison. 
 a 91 U. S. 319, U. S. v. Ashfleld. 
 o 95 U. S. 749, U. S. v. Meigs. 
 
 MARBURY, 91 U. S. 587. 
 
 I a 96 U. S. 618, Hayward v. Bank. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 297 
 
 TWrrCHBXI. V. COMMONWEAIiTH, 7 Wall. 331. 
 
 Constitution ; first ten amend- 
 ments ; limits power of U. S. a 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State court ; allowance. 6 
 
 a 9 Willi. 278, Justices v. Murray. 
 6 9 Willi. 783. Gleason v. Florida. 
 a 21 Wall. 557, Edwards v. Elliott. 
 a 92 U. S. 552, U. S. v. Cruikshank 
 
 TWO HUNDRED CHESTS OP TEA, TJ. S. v. See U. S. v. 200 Chests of Tea. 
 TTACK, DOSS V. See Doss v. Tyaok. 
 
 TTtEK V. DEFBEES, 11 "Wall. 831. 
 
 Confiscation, a 
 
 Constitution ; " due process ol 
 
 a 95 U. S. 778, Alexandria!). Fair- 
 fax. 
 6 102 U. S. 594, Springer v. U. S. 
 
 law." 6 
 
 TTIiER, HABVET v. See Harvey v. Tyler. 
 TYIEK, MAGWTRE v. See Magwire v. Tyler. 
 TELER V. TUEL, 6 Cr. 384. 
 
 Patent law ; assignees ; suit for | a 7 Wall. 521, Moore v. Marsh, 
 infringement, a I 
 
 TTLEB, V. S. V. See U. S. o. Tyler. 
 TTNEN, C. S. V. See U. S. <t. Tynen. 
 UDAtli V. THE OHIO, 17 H. 17. 
 
 Sup. Court; amount in dispute, a | a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill v. Petty. 
 
 TTDELI- V. DAVTDSON, 7 H. 769. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to I a 10 H. 322, Henderson u. Tenn. 
 State courts ; Federal question, a | a 15 H. 351, Walworth v. Kneeland 
 
 UNION BANK v. GEABT, 5 P. 99. 
 
 Pleadino- in equity ; answer must I a 4 H. 216, Carpenter v. Ins. Co. 
 be responsWe to the bill. u. | a 6 H. 529, Patterson v. Gaines. 
 
 UNION BANK V. JOIXT, 18 H. 503 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction cannot 
 be impaired by State legislation, a 
 Conflict of jurisdiction, b 
 
 a 20 H. 173, Hyde v. Stone. 
 6 2:J H. 107, Green v. Creighton. 
 a 7 Wall. 430, Payne v. Hook. 
 a 13 Wall. 286, B.K. Co.u Whitton 
 
 UNION BANK V. I.AIBD, 8 Wh. 390. 
 
 Stock • liens on ■ waiver, a I a 1 P. 304, Mecli. Bank v. Seton. 
 
 btock , uens on , waive. | „ lo p. 610, Brent v. Bank Wash. 
 
 UNION BANK, MAGRITDEB v. See Magruder v. Union Bank. 
 UNION BANK V. MAGRUDER, 7 P. 887. 
 
 Negotiable paper ; notice and de- a 20 P. 498, Sigerson v. Mathews. 
 mand° for payment ; discharge of 
 iadorser. a 
 
 UNION BANK OP PLA., BROWN v. See Brown v. Union Banli of Florida. 
 UNION BANK, PLANTERS' BANK v. See Planters' Bank v. Union Bank. 
 UNION BANK, STAFPOBD v. See Stafford i). Union Bank. 
 UNION BANK TENN., BRADFORD v. See Bradford v. Union Bank Tenn. 
 
298 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNION INS. CO. V. U. S., 6 WaU. 763 
 
 Confiscation act of 1862 ; iiuisdic- 
 tion o! IJ. S. District Courts, a 
 
 Supi-eme Court ; reversals where 
 court , below is without jurisdic- 
 tiou. h 
 
 a 6 Wall. 772, U. S. ». Hart. 
 a 7 Wall. 579, Morris ». U. S. 
 a 8 Wall. 511, Morris's Cotton. 
 a 10 Wall. 543, ex parte Graham, 
 a 11 Wall. 304, Miller v. U. S. 
 & 23 Wall. 164, Sticliney v. Wilt. 
 
 See Com. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Unioa Ins. Co. 
 
 See Thompson ii. Union Pao. B. E. Co. 
 R. R. CO., V. S. T. See U. S. v. Union Pac. E. E. Co. 
 R. R. CO. V. U. S., 99 U. S. 40a. 
 
 UNION INS. CO., COM. INS. CO. v. 
 UNION PAC. R. R., THOMPSON v. 
 UNION PAC, 
 UNION PAC, 
 
 Subsidies to the Pacific railroads ; 
 construction of acts of Congress, a 
 
 UNION S. S. CO. V. NEW YORK S. S, 
 
 Collision ; when loss must rest 
 where it falls, a 
 Inevitable accident. 6 
 Lights, c 
 
 a 99 U. S. 450, U. S. «. C. Pac. R. R. 
 a 99 U. S. 4.56, U. S. u. K. Pac. R. R. 
 a 99 U. S..492, U. S. k. Sioux R. R. 
 
 . CO., S4 H. 313. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 556i Tlie Morn'g Light 
 
 a 12 Wall. 43, Tlie Maria Martin, 
 
 6 14 Wall. 215, The Mabey. 
 
 6 14 Wall. 355, The Continental, 
 
 6 21 Wall. 17, The Lady Pilje. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 13, The Clarita. 
 
 a 91 tJ. S. 215, The Sunnyside. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 319, The Atlas, 
 
 c 95 U. S. 610, The Wanata. 
 a 102 U. S. 203, Tlie Clara. 
 
 UNITED STATES, EX PARTE, 16 WaU. 699. 
 
 Court of Claims ; new trials ; ef- I a 94 U. S. 259, U, S. v. Young, 
 feet on pending appeals, a , I 
 UNITED STATES v. ADAMS, 7 TTall. 463. 
 
 Suits against the government in 
 Court of Claims ; when acceptance 
 of an award bars farther suit, a 
 
 a 12 Wall. 241, U. 
 a 14 Wall. 550, U. 
 
 S. V. Child. 
 S, V. Justice. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 73, Mason v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. ADDISON, 83 H. 174. 
 
 a 6 AVall. 297, U. S. v. Ajddison. 
 ?) 10 Wall. 291, Slaughter-House 
 Cases. 
 
 Supreme Court; amount in con- 
 troversy, a 
 Snpersedeas. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES, AXTISO v. See Alviso v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. AMEDY, 11 Wh. 392. 
 
 U. S. ; priority ; corporations 
 "persons," under the acts giving 
 priority, a 
 
 a 12 P. 131, Beaston o. Farm. Bank 
 o 13 P. 584, Bank of Aug. v. Earle. 
 
 UNITED STATES, AMERICAN FUR CO. T. See American Fur Co. u, U. S. 
 UNITED. STATES v. ANDERSON, 9 Wall. 64. 
 
 Captured and abandoned prop- 
 erty act of March 12, 1863. a 
 Close of the civil war. 6 
 Cotton ; legitimate subject of cap- 
 ture. 
 
 a 
 b 
 h 
 h 
 
 9 Wall. 
 
 10 Wall. 
 
 11 Wall. 
 19 Wall. 
 
 a 
 c 
 
 •22 Wall. 
 92 U. S. 
 
 6 102 U. 8. 
 UNITED STATES, ARGUEI,I,0 v. See Axguello •». U. S. 
 
 538, U. S. V. Padelford. 
 
 25, McKee v. Rains, 
 
 253, Levy v. Stewart. 
 
 525, Burlie v. Milten- 
 
 berger. 
 
 97, Haycraft v. U. S. 
 194, liamar v. Brown. 
 438, McElrath v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 299 
 
 UNITED STATES, ARMSTRONG v. See Armstrong v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, ARNOLD v. Seo Arnold v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. ARKEDDNDO, 6 P. 
 
 Florida hiiifl titlf s ; S p a 1 1 i s ti 
 grants ; a grant made by an otiicei- 
 authorized to make it prima-facie 
 evidence that it is rightfully made ; 
 jurisdictiou. a 
 
 Grants cannot affect pre-existing 
 titles. 5 
 
 What are "grants and conces- 
 sions" nnder the treaty with Spain ; 
 construction of the treaty; grant of 
 Indian lands, c 
 
 Grants on conditions ; cypres, d 
 
 Elder legal title ; right to posses- 
 sion; nnster; adverse possession, e 
 
 Public grants; construction in 
 favor of the public. / 
 
 Fraud ; not presumed, g 
 
 Cession of territory; eflfect on 
 property, h 
 
 Politiciil branches of the govern- 
 ment; boundary line determined 
 by, must be recognized as the 
 true one by the judiciary, i 
 
 Concession void for want of loca- 
 tion and identity, j 
 
 Effect on gi-ant of want of sur- 
 vey, k 
 
 U. S.; consent to be sued. I 
 
 Treaties; supreme law of the 
 land, m 
 
 When concluded, n 
 
 When grant takes effect, o 
 
 091. 
 
 9 P. 30, D(-laspns v. U. S. 
 y P. 233, New Orl. o. Armas. 
 9P. 734, Mitchell u. U. S. 
 
 10 P. 321, U.,S. V. Fernaiidoz. 
 10 P. 321. U. S. ». Sibhald. 
 
 10 P. 4G9, Voorhees v Bank U.S. 
 
 11 P. 49, Ewing v. Burnett. 
 
 11 P. 544, Bridge v War. Bridge 
 
 12 P. 196. Clarke M. White. 
 12 P. 479, U. S. V. Kingsley. 
 12 P. 436. Strother v. Lucas. 
 12 P. 511. Garcia v. Lee. 
 
 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 
 13 P. 446, Bagnell v. Broderick. 
 
 14 P. 344, U. S. V. Wiggins. 
 
 15 P. 180, U. S. V. Forbes. 
 
 15 P. 220, Buick v. U. S. 
 
 16 P. 81, Cocke v. Halsey. 
 16 P. 155, U. S. V. Miranda. 
 16 P. 231, U. S. V. Clarke. 
 
 2 H. 335, Grignon v. Astor. 
 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile. 
 
 10 H. 554, Villabolos v. XJ. S. 
 13 H. 252, Glenn v. U. S. 
 
 16 H. 269, Bartlett v. Kane. 
 
 17 H. 564, Fremont v. U. S. 
 
 19 H. 366, Fellows v Blacksmith 
 
 20 H. 60, U. S. V. Cambuston. 
 
 21 H. 446, U. S. V. Fossatt. 
 
 22 H. 459, Fuentes v. U. S. 
 24 H. 522, Belcher v. Linn. 
 
 9 Wall. 34, Haver v. Taker. 
 
 11 Wall. 639, U. S. v. Lynde. 
 
 18 Wall. 117, Best v. Polk. 
 
 18 Wall. 467, Thompson v Whit- 
 man. 
 97 U. S. 216, McMicken v. U. S. 
 101 U. S. 509, Hall v. Russell. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. ARTHUR, 6 Cr. 861. 
 
 Pleading ; judgment will be given a 7 Wall. 93, Aurora v. West, 
 against party whose pleading is 
 first defective, a 
 
 UNITED STATES, THE AURORA t. See Aurora, The, v. V. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. AUGUISOLA, 1 WaU. 355. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; docu- I a 1 Wall. 402, U. S, v. Moreno, 
 mentary evidence, a \al Wall. 422, U. S. v. Yorba. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. ATRES, 6 Wall. 608. 
 
 Court of Claims i appeals, a I a 12 Wall. 176, U. S. v. Crusell. 
 New trial. 6 I & 94 U. S. 2.59, U. S. v. Young. 
 
300 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. BABBITT, 1 Bl 
 
 Statutes ; what is implied is as 
 mucli a part of a statute as wiiat 
 is expressed, a 
 
 61. 
 
 1 Wall. 
 
 1 Wall. 
 
 5 Willi. 
 
 8 Willi. 
 
 8 Willi. 
 
 8 Wall. 
 a 10 Wall. 
 a 11 Wall. 
 a 10 Wall, 
 a 16 Wall. 
 a 19 Wall. 
 a 19 Wall. 
 a 19 Wall. 
 a 20 Wall. 
 a 20 Wall. 
 a 22 Wall. 
 a 92 U. S, 
 a 9.3 U. 
 aOSV. 
 a 94 U. 
 a 95 U. 
 a 9.5 U. 
 alOOU. 
 alOlU. 
 
 221, Gelpcke v. Dubijqiie 
 393, Mevei-D. Muscatine. 
 283, Croxall v. Slu'rerd. 
 288, Canal Co. u. Colli Co 
 607, Kennedy u. Gibson, 
 581, Dutz V. MuscatiiK',. 
 406, U. S. V. Hod.son. [ 
 504, Stewart v. Kaliii. 
 
 13, Lyiide v. County. 
 223, Davis v. Gray. 
 
 40, Culkley v. U. S. 
 427, Tele. Co. v. Eyser. 
 676, PineGr"ve«Tiilcott 
 250, Cornelt M.Williams 
 493, Hearne v. Ins. Co. 
 176, Burnliisel u Firman 
 164, Hoffman v. Ins. Co. 
 300, Ind.E.E.s.Horst. 
 624, Supv'rs v. Iron Co. 
 400, Cliorpenning»U. S 
 834, U. S. V. Babbitt. 
 763, U. S. V. Moore. 
 703, Niit.Bk.B. Graham 
 202, Pompton v. Cooper 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BAGS OE COFFEE, 8 Cr. 393. 
 
 Revenue laws; when forfeiture 
 attaches, a 
 
 Bona-flde sale to innocent pur- 
 chasei's before seizure. 6 
 
 Proceedings in rem. c 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BALLET, 9 P. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 
 a 3 Wh. 246, Gelston v. Hoyt. 
 a 8 H. 378, Caldwell v. U. S. 
 & 7 Wall. 460, Conliscation Cases. 
 6 11 Wall. 868, Distilled Spirits. 
 a 14 Wall. 57, Henderson's Spirits 
 c 96 U. S. 404, Dobbin's Distillery 
 
 867. 
 
 a 12 P. 288, White v. Turk. 
 a 5 H. 209, V.S.v. Briggs. • 
 a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Chicago. 
 a 18 H. 566, Dennistown v Stewart 
 a 3 Widl. 255, Daniels v. R. E. Co. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BANK OF METBOPOMS, 15 P. 393. 
 
 U. S.; contracts, a 
 
 Power of U. S. olflcers to issue 
 negotiable paper, b 
 
 Failure of cohsideration ; when 
 no defense in action by payee 
 against acceptor, c 
 
 a 11 H. 231. Cotton v. U. S. 
 6 7 Wall. 078, Floyd Acceptiinoes 
 6 10 Wall. 158, Bk. Rep. v. Millard 
 c 12 Wall. 192, Hoffman v. Bank. 
 6 91 U. S. 396, Cooke v. U.S. 
 6 96 U. S. 36, U. S. v. State Bank. 
 
 UNITED STATES, BANK OF THE U. S. v. See Bank of the U. S. 'O. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. BABBLER, 3 Wh. 398. 
 
 a 12 P. 144, Sarchet ». t. S. 
 
 Circuit Courts; jurisdiction; 
 wiien final in cases removed from 
 District Courts, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BABKEB, 9 Cr. 343. 
 
 War ; what are "munitions of I a 2 Wh. 118, U. S. v. Sheldon, 
 war ; " !ict 6th July, 1813. a \ 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 301 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BASSETT, 81 H. 4ia. 
 
 CfiUfornia land titles; Mexican | a 1 Bl. 37, U. S. v. Hensley. 
 grants; "Sutter's general title." a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, BASSETT v. See Bassett v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES, BATNE v. See Bayne v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BENNITZ, 23 H. aSS. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; "Siit- | a 1 Bl. 37, U. S. v. Hensley. 
 ter's general title." a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. THE BETSEY. See Betsey and Charlotte, The. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BEVANS, S 'Wh, 
 
 Constitution ; judicial power, a 
 
 U. S. courts; can only exercise 
 jurisdiction conferred by Con- 
 gress. 6 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction; exclu- 
 sive, c 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 raerce. d 
 
 UNITED STATES, BEVANS v. See Bevans v. V. S. 
 
 a 12 P. 714, Ehode Island v. Mass. 
 b G Wall. 488, U. S. v. Eckford. 
 c 16 Wall. 531, Steam. Co. U.Chase 
 d 93 U. S. 104, Sherlock v. Ailing. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BOISDORE, 8 H. 131 
 
 Writ of error; effect of i-epeal 
 of act conferring jurisdiction on 
 pending cases, a 
 
 Titles in Louisiana ; French and 
 Spanish grants ; acts 1824 and 
 June 17, 1844 ; jurisdiction of Dis- 
 trict Court. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BOISDOKE, 11 H. 63. 
 
 a 10 H. 77, McNulty v. Batty. 
 
 b 12 H. 432, U. S. v. Porche. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 401, E. B. Co. v. Grant. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; incom- 
 plete Spanish grants, a 
 
 Acts May 26, 1824, and June 17, 
 1844; power of the District Court, b 
 
 Conditional grants, c 
 
 a 11 H. 124, Lecompte v. U. S. 
 
 6 12 H. 217, U. 8. V. Moore. 
 
 a 12 H. 434, U. S. v. Simon. 
 
 « 13 H. 252, Glenn v. U. S. 
 
 a 17 H. 552, Fremont v. U. S. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 707, D'Auterive v. U.S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BOI.TON, 83 H. 341. 
 
 California; Mexican titles ; by I a 24 H. 351, U. S. v. Castro, 
 what evidence proven, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, BONNEB v. See Bonner u. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BOOTH, 81 H. 
 
 Supreme Court; appeals; re- 
 turn of and docketing; transcript, a 
 
 U. S. courts ; interference with 
 their jurisdiction by State courts, b 
 
 613. See Ableman v. Booth, 
 a 3 Wall. 764, U. S. «. Gomez. 
 a 10 Wall. 426, U. S. v. Vigil. 
 6 13 Wall. 403, Tarble's Case. 
 a 99 U. S. 507, Grigsby v. Purcell. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. BOUTWEtl., 17 Wall. 604. 
 
 Mandamus; abatement, a | a 99 U. S. 626, Coram. «. Sellew. 
 
 Costs. 6 
 
 6 102 U. S. 408, U. S. v. Sciiurz. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. 
 
 Kevised statutes. 
 
 BOWEN, 100 U. S. 508. 
 
 a I a 101 U 
 
 S. 36, Arthur v. Dodge. 
 a 102 U. S. 11, Meyer v. Car Co. 
 
302 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BOYD, 15 P. a08. 
 
 Offlcial bonds ; sureties, a 
 U. S.; not responsible for the 
 laches or torts of officers, 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BOYD, S H. 48, 
 
 Pleading over; waiver of demnr- 
 rer. a 
 
 a 1 H. 104, U. S. «. Linn. 
 a 5 H. 48, U. S. v. Boyd. 
 
 a 11 H. 28, U. S. i>. Girault, 
 
 a 20 H. 76, LeggettB Humphreys 
 a 2 Wall. 235, Smith v. U. S. 
 
 6 18 Wall. 603. Jones u. U. S. 
 
 b 98 U. S. 489, U. S. ». Thompson 
 
 a 7 Wall. 92, Aurora v. West. 
 a 9 Wall. 762, Wafkins ». U. S. 
 a 93 U. S. 553, Stanton ». Embrey. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BKADI.EY, 10 P. 364. 
 
 Bonds; power of U. S. to con- 
 tract; when bond good as common 
 law bond, a 
 
 Contract ; when not malum in se, 
 part bad does not affect the good. 6 
 
 Liability of sureties; additional 
 duties, c 
 
 a 15 P. 311, U. S. V. Linn. 
 (1 12 H. 102, Neilson v. Lagow. 
 6 1 Wall. 222, Gelpeke » Dubuque 
 a 10 Wall. 406, U. S. v. Hodson. 
 c 14 Wall. 502, U. S. v. Powell. 
 b 22 Wall. 177. Burnhisel » Firman 
 a-97 U. S. 42i; U. S. v. Mora. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. BBEITIING, 80 H. 254. 
 
 Error ; hypothetical charge, a 
 Bills of exceptions ; time of draw- 
 ing out and signing, b 
 
 a 22 H. 224, Chaffee v. Belting Co. 
 b 2 Bl. 568, Dredge v. Forsyth. 
 6 2 Bl. 573. Kellogg v. Forsyth. 
 a 9 Wall. 5.)4, Mich.Bk.»Bldred. 
 a 14 Wall. 447, Imp. Co.wMiinsoii. 
 a 16 Wall. 389, Ins. Co. v. Piaggio. 
 a 16 Wall. 518, Tweed's Case. 
 a 20 Wall. 162, U. S. v. Baring. 
 b 91 U. S. 250, Muller v. Ehlers. 
 6 93 U. S. 555, Stanton v. Embrey. 
 6102U. S. 354, Hunnicutt K Peyton 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BBEWABD, 16 P. 147. 
 
 Florida titles; Spanish surveys. a\ a II H. 86, U. 8. v. Boisdore. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. BBlboS, 5 H. 808. 
 
 Certificates of division, a I a 18 H. 566, Dennistown v Stewart 
 
 I a 3 Wall. 255, Daniels ». K. E. Co 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BROMLEY, la H. 95. 
 
 "Revenue laws"; what are. a | a 91 U. S. 568, U. S. v. Iforton. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. BROOKS, 10 H. 445. 
 
 a 19 H. 366, Fellows v. Blacksmith 
 b 17 Wall. 247, Holden v. Joy. 
 
 'I'rcaties ; law of the land, a 
 Authority of Congress to part 
 with the public land by treaty. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES, BROWN v. See Brown v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, BRUCE v. See Bruce v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. BUCHANAN, 8 H. 83. 
 
 Departments of the government ; I 9 H. 489, U. S. v. Browa. 
 extra allowances, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES, BUCKLEY v. See Buckley v. V. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 303 
 
 UNITBa) STATES v. BUFORD, 3 P. 
 
 Suits on bonds of pnbllc offleera ; 
 Treasury transcripts and eertifl- 
 catos. a 
 
 Error ; refusal to grant new trial 
 not assignable, h 
 
 Statutes of limitations ; do not 
 bar the U. S. c 
 
 18. 
 
 a 8 P. 380, U. S. i>. Jones, 
 a 10 H. 132, Hoyti). U. S. 
 al3H. 479, U.'S.jj. Hodge. 
 al7H. 438. Bruce w. U. S. 
 6 1 Wall. 598, Pomeroy v. Bank. 
 6 11 Wall. 67G, Cook u. Burnley, 
 c 98 U. S. 488, U. S. v. Thompson. 
 al02U. S. 554, U. S.m. Phison. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. THE BURDETTE, 9 P. 683. 
 
 Kevenue ; suits for penalties ; I a 97 U. S. 272, Lllienthall's Tobacco 
 burden of proof, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BURNS, 18 'Wan. S46. 
 
 Patent law; U. S. cannot use I a 94U. S. 235, CammeyervNewton 
 patent any more than Individuals, a 1 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CAMBUSTON, 80 H. 59. 
 
 California ; Mexican land titles ; a 22 H. 460, Fuentes v. TJ. S. 
 
 recitals in grant; observance 
 preliminary steps, a 
 
 Record evidence of grant. 6 
 
 Power to grant, c 
 
 of b 23 H. 350, U. S. v. Bolton. 
 6 1 Bl. 252, U. S. V. Knight, 
 c 1 Bl. 5.52, U. S. V. Vallejo. 
 6 1 Wall. 745, Romero v. U. S. 
 6 10 Wall. 241, Hornsby v. U. S. 
 a 93 U. S. 286, Cambuston v. U. i 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CANTRDL, 4 Cr. X61. 
 
 Counterfeiting, a \ a\\ Wall. 435, U. S. v. Howell. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CARR, 8 H. 9. 
 
 Sup. Coui't ; amount in contro- 
 versy, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CASKS OF SUGAR, 8 P. 877. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 210, Seaver e. Bigelows. 
 
 Duties; whether article in com- 
 merce is known by the term used in 
 tariff act, a question for the jury, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CASES OF WINB, 1 P. 650. 
 
 a 3 H. 108, Curtis v. Martin. 
 a 7 H. 790, Lawrence v. Allen. 
 a 92 U. S. 470, Tyng v. Grinnell. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. ». Folsom . 
 6 20 Wall. 223, The Lottawanna. 
 
 Supreme Court ; review of facts, a 
 Admiralty ; sales to satisfy 
 liens; surplus. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CASTANT, 18 H. 437. 
 
 Louisiana land titles; Spanish I a 11 Wall. 643, U. S. ». Lynde 
 grant after treaty St. Ddefonso. a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CASTrLlERO, 83 H. 468. 
 
 Ciiliforiiia ; Mexican titles ; colo- 1 a 2 Bl. 164, U. S. v. Castillero. 
 nization laws ; power of alcalde, a | 
 
 UNITED STATES T. CAlSTILI/ERO, 2 Bl. 149. 
 
 California; Mexican titles ; when | a 1 Wall. 743, Romero ». U. S, 
 Mexican authority ceased, a 
 UNITED STATES v. CASTRO, 84 H, 
 
 California; Mexican titles; au- 
 thority to grant; evidence of 
 grant, a 
 
 a 6 Wall. 435, Mumford v. Wardell. 
 
 349. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 251, U. S. V. Knight. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 305, U. S. v. Naleigh. 
 a 1 Bl. 552, U. S. ». Vallejo. 
 a 1 Wall. 745, Romero v. U. S. 
 a 10 Wall. 241, Hornsby v. U. S. 
 
304 
 
 MANUAL 0¥ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. CHICAGO, 7 H. 196. 
 
 Dediiiation. a 
 Certificates of division. 
 
 a 9 H. 25, Irwin v. iN'ixion. 
 
 b 3 Wall. 255, Daniels v. R. R. Co 
 
 6 7 "Wall. 582, U. S. v. Eosenburgh. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CHILD, 13 Wall. 838. 
 
 U. S.; contracts by; when a pay- 
 ment and receipt given bai's fur- 
 ther claim, a 
 
 a 13 Wall. 37, U. S. v. Clyde. 
 a 14 Wall. 550, U. S. v. Justice. 
 a 17 Wall. 73, Mason v. U. S. 
 a 22 Wall. 509, Piatt w. U. S. 
 a 92 U. S. 388, Saviige v. U. S. 
 a 94 U. S. 404, U. S. v. Martin. 
 
 a 8 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CIRCUIT JUDGES, 3 "Wall. 674. 
 
 Constitution ; judicial power, a | a 9 "Vyall. 247, ex parte Zellner. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. CITY BANK, 19 H. 385. 
 
 Certificates of division, a I a 3 Wall . 304, Havemeyer ». Iowa, 
 
 I a 3 Wall. 255, Daniels v. E. R. Co. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CI.ABK, 94 U. S. 73. 
 
 Court of Claims; appeals; find- I a 96 U. S. 38, TJ. S. v. Clark, 
 ings of facts, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CI/ARK CO., 96 U. S. 811. 
 
 County bonds in aid of railroads; | a 99 U. S. 589, TJ. S. v. Macon Co. 
 payment by special tax. a 
 
 UNITED STATES V. CI.ABKE, 8 P. 
 
 Florida titles ; Spanish grants ; 
 construction of treaty and acts ad- 
 justing land claims in Florida, a 
 
 Jurisdiction ; grant made by ofH- 
 cer authorized to make it, presum- 
 ably valid. 6 
 
 Grants on conditions, c 
 
 What are "grants and conces- 
 sions " under the treaty, d 
 
 Surveys, e 
 
 Cession of territory ; efffect on 
 property rights. /' 
 
 Persons authorized to grant un- 
 der Spain, g 
 
 Mere possession no equity, h 
 
 Jurisdiction of Circuit Courts, i 
 
 TJ. S.; suits against, j 
 
 P. 479, U. S. B. Levi. 
 P. 488, TJ. S. V. Huertas. 
 P. 130, Delassus v. TI. S. 
 P. 168, U. S. V. Clark. 
 P. 734, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 P. 326, Smith v. U. S. 
 P. 436, Strother v. Lucas. 
 P. 135, U. S. V. Rodman. 
 P. 180, U. S. V. Forbes. 
 P. 328, TJ. S. V. Delespine. 
 H. 301, Menard v. Massey. 
 H. 4, U. S. V. Davenport. 
 H. 345, U. S. V. Peralta. 
 Wall. 461, Serrano v. U. S. 
 Wall. 488, U. S. v. Eckford. 
 Wall. 154, The Siren. 
 U. S. 489, U. S. V. Thompson. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CI.AKKE & ATKINSON, 16 P. 331. 
 
 Florida land titles, a I a 1 H. 24, TJ. S. v. Acosta. 
 
 I a 3 H. 618, Chaires v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. COMMISSIONEKS OF lAND OFFICE, SWall. 563. 
 
 Mandamus to executive oflScers. a i a 7 Wall. 352, Gaines D.Thompson 
 
 I a 9 Wall. 312, Seer, t; McGarrahan. 
 UNITED STATES v. COOK, 17 Wall. 174. 
 Indictments, a I a 92 U. S. 558, U. S. v. Cruikshank 
 
 I a 95 U. S. 584, U. S. v. Mann. 
 UNITED STATES v. COOK, 19 Wall. 591. 
 
 Indians; right of occupancy, a I o 92 U. S. 743, Leav. R.R.u.TJ.S. 
 Eight of U. S. to sell fee. 6 | 6 95 U. S. 524, Beecher u Weth'rby 
 
 a 
 
 8 
 
 b 
 
 9 
 
 c 
 
 9 
 
 d 
 
 9 
 
 e 
 
 10 
 
 f 
 
 12 
 
 c 
 
 15 
 
 c 
 
 15 
 
 9 
 
 15 
 
 !) 
 
 8 
 
 9 
 
 15 
 
 i 
 
 19 
 5 
 
 I 
 
 6 
 
 .1 
 
 7 
 
 3 
 
 98 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 305 
 
 UNITED STATES, CONTERSE v. See Converse v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. COOI.IDGE, 1 WU. 415. 
 
 Circuit Coufts; can only exer- 
 cise jurisdiction conferred by Con- 
 gress ; ofifenses. a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. COOMBS, 18 P. 73. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 488, U. S. v. Eckford. 
 a 98 U. S. 345, U. S. v. Hall. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction, a 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce. 6 
 
 a 5 H. 452, Waring v. Claike. 
 6 3 Wall. 725, Gilman v. PhUa. 
 
 UNITED STATES, COTTON v. See Cotton v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, COX v. See Cox v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. CROSBY, 7 Cr. 115. 
 
 Real property ; disposition of as 9 Wh. 566, Kerr v. Moon, 
 governed by law of State where a 10 Wh. 199, McCormick v. SuUi- 
 situated. a vant. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 635, Brine v. Ins. Co. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CRUIKSHANK, 9S U. S. 548. 
 
 Crimes; double punishment ; i a 100 CJ. S. 390, ex ^arte Siebold. 
 oflense against the State and U.S. a\ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CKUSELL, 14 WaU. 6. 
 
 Court of Claims ; captured and 
 abandoned property act. a 
 New trial. 6 
 
 a 92 U. S. 284, U. S. v. Eoss. 
 6 94 U. S. 259, U. S. v. Young, 
 a 99 U. S. 271, U. S. v. Pugb. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CRUZ CERVANTES, 18 Wall. 553. 
 
 California ; JSIexican title.^ ; ap- I a 10 Wall. 238, Hornsby v. U. S. 
 proval of grant by assembly, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. CURRY, 6 H. 113. 
 
 Supersedeas; writ of error to a 
 Supreme Court ; no power in the 6 
 U. S. courts to dispense with the a 
 provisions of the acts regulating, a c 
 
 Docketing and return of writs of 
 error and appeals ; citation. 6 
 ' Appellate jurisdiction, c 
 
 12 H. 389, Saltmarsh v. Tuthill. 
 
 19 H. 181, The Virginia v. West. 
 
 20 H. 206, Carroll jj.'Dorsey. 
 1 Wall. 251, ex parte Vallandi- 
 
 gham. 
 3 Wall. 50, Castro v. U. S. 
 6 Wall. 451, Kail v. Wetmore. 
 
 6 Wall. 496, Washington v Den- 
 
 nison.. 
 
 7 Wall. 309, Edmonson uBloom- 
 
 shire. 
 94 U. S. 112, Dayton v. Lash. 
 94 U. S. 259, U. S. v. Young. 
 
 UNITED STATES, CUTNEB v. See Cntner v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. CUTTING, 3 Wall. 441. 
 
 Revenue ; tax on bankers, a | a 91 U. S. 712, Warren v. Shook. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. D'AGUIEEE, 1 Wall. 316. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; ex- i a 5 Wall. 538, U. 8. v. Pico, 
 tent of land governor could grant, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES, DAIK v. See Dair v. V. S. 
 20 
 
306 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HAJSIEt,, 6 'Wli, 
 
 Mandamus; discretionary pow- 
 ers, a 
 
 "New trials ; relusal to grant ; cer- 
 tificates of division. 6 
 
 Mil. 
 
 a 8 P. 302, Ins. Co. v. Wilson. 
 6 10 P. 288, Davis v. Bi-aden. 
 
 6 4H. 19, Brown v. Clarke. 
 
 6 5 H. 22.3, .Tones v. Van Zant. 
 
 6 7 H. 190, U. S. V. Chicago. 
 
 6 H Wall. 254, Daniels v. R. R. 
 
 6 4 Wall. Ill, ex parte Millegan. 
 
 6 7 Wall. 581, U. S. v Rosenburgh 
 
 UNITED STATES v. DASETEEI., 4 TTall. 18S. 
 
 Public officers ; liability for I a 9 Wall. 88, U. S. v. Keehler. 
 money stolen, a | a 13 Wall. 24, Boyden v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. D'AUTEKIVB, 10 H. 609. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; invalidity a 12 H. 50, Montanlt v. U. S. 
 of French grants in territory a 12 H. 43S, U. S. v. Castant. 
 ceded, a a 13 H. 9, U. S. v. Pillarin. 
 
 a 15 H. 39, U. S. v. Ducros. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 643, U. S. v. Lynde. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. D'AUTERIVE, 15 H. 14. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; Imperfect I a 101 U. S. 701, D' Auterive v. U. S. 
 French grant, a \ 
 
 TJJSriTED STATES v. DAVENPOBT, 15 H. 1. 
 
 Secondary evidence of grant, a 
 
 Louisiana land titles: grants in 
 
 the ' neutral territory ' by Spain. & 
 
 a 21 H. 175, U. S. v. Sutter. 
 a 1 Bl. 555, U. S. v. Vallejo. 
 6 98 U. S. 429, U. S. ». Perot. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. DAWSON, 16 H. 488. 
 
 Crimes against the U. S.; where ! as 1 Bl. 486, U. S. v. Jackalow. 
 tried, u, I 
 
 UNITED STATES, DE GBOOT v. See De Groot «. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES V. DE HAKO, 88 H. 893. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; grant I a 1 Bl. 270, U. S. v. Wilson, 
 to Mission Indians, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES T. DEIKEtMAN, 98 U. S. 580. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 68, Young v. U. S. 
 
 International law ; demands 
 against governments; how prose- 
 cuted, a 
 
 UNITED STATES, DEI,ASSUS v. See Delassns v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. DELESPINE, 18 P. 665. 
 
 Spanish grants; evidence, a | a 14 P. 344, U. S. v. Wiggins. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. DEIiESPlNE, 15 P. 319. 
 
 Florida land titles, a 
 Incomplete titles, b 
 When copies evidence under the 
 Spanish law. c 
 
 a 16 P. 155, U. S. V. Miranda. 
 a 3 H. 618, Chaires v. U. S. 
 a 3 H. 623, U. S. v. Marvin. 
 6 3 H. 784, U. S. v. King. 
 6 10 H. 554, Villabolos v. U. S. 
 6 11 H. 124, Lecompte v. U. S. 
 c 15 H. 4, U. S. V. Davenport. 
 See Desmar6 r. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES, DESMAKE v. 
 
 UNITED STATES, DE VHEMONT v. See De Vilemont v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 307 
 
 ITNITED STATES v. DE -IVITT, 9 Wall. 141. 
 
 Constitution ; police power, a 
 
 a 16 Wall. 64, Slaugliter -House 
 
 Cases. 
 a 97 U. S. 504, Patterson v. Ky. 
 
 CTflTED STATES V. DICKSON, 15 P. 141. 
 
 Collectors; compensation, i 
 Statutes ; construction. 6 
 
 a 10 H. 132, Hoyt v. U. S. 
 
 6 23 Wall. 382, Smytiie v. FisUe 
 Provisos, c c 93 U. S. 83, Rj'an v. Carter. 
 
 UNITED STATES, DOBBINS'S DIST. v. See Dobbms's Distillery v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, SAVINGS BANK v. See Dollar .Savings Banlt d. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, DUGAN v. See Dugan u. U. S. 
 UNITED states; DUKOUSSEAU v. See Durousseau v. U. S. 
 UNITED states v. ECKEOBD, 1 H, 850 
 
 Application of payments, a 
 Suits on bonds of public officers ; 
 Treasury transcripts, b 
 
 a 7 H. 684, Jones v. U. S. 
 6 10 H. 132, Hoyt b. U. S. 
 b 13H. 479, U.S. U.Hodge. 
 b 19 Wall. 21 :i, U. S. v. Gaussen. 
 6 100 U. S. 11, Soule v. U. S. 
 
 UNTIED STATES v. ECKFOBD, 6 WaU. 488. 
 
 9 Wall. 765, Watkins v, U. S. 
 
 Public oflScers; suits against ; set- 
 offs ; credits, a 
 
 Moniod judgment cannot be ren- 
 dered against the U. S. except in 
 Court of Claims. 6 
 
 6 n Wall. 201, Case v. Terrell. 
 a 91 U. S. 562, Hall v. U. S. 
 a 92 U. S. 367, Scammon «. Kim 
 ball. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. EIGHTT-FOUB BOXES OP SUGAK, 7 P. 456. 
 
 Duties ; suits against importers; I a 10 H. 234, G-reeley v. Thompson 
 penalties, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. BMASON, 16 P 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error ; 
 
 391. 
 
 a 10 H. 341, Stimpson v. R. R. Co. 
 a 20 H. 434, Suydara U.Williamson. 
 b 21 H. 167, Barreda v. Silsbv. 
 a 1 Wall. 103, Burr v. Des Moines. 
 a 1 Wall. 602, Pomeroy «. Bank, 
 o 10 Wall. 261, R. R. Co. v Morgan 
 a 14 Wall. 53, Henderson's Spirits 
 c 20 Wall. 109, Confiscation Cases. 
 
 case agreed, a 
 
 When facts found by jury cannot 
 be re-examined in U. S. courts ex- 
 cept in accordance with rules of 
 common law. b 
 
 Acts of heads of departments re- 
 garded as acts of the President, c 
 UNITED STATES, ERWIN v. See Erwin v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES, TAKRAR v. See Farrar v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. PATIO, 8 P. 492. 
 
 Florida titles; British grants, a | a 8 P. 494, U. S. v. Gibson. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. FERNANDEZ, 10 P. 305. 
 
 Florida land titles; obligation of I a 12 P. 436, Strother ». Lucas, 
 the U. g. under the treaty, a | 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PBBRABT, 93 U. S. 625. 
 
 Internal revenue ; suit against I a 99 U. S. 233, King v. U. 8. 
 collector by the U. S. a | 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PERREERA, 13 H. 40. 
 
 Constitution; judicial power of 
 the U. S. a 
 
 Florida claims; treaty with Spain 
 of 1819; interest, b 
 
 al7H. 531, U. S. u. Ritchie. 
 
 a 18 H. 274, Murrayu.HobokenCo. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 253, ex parte Vallandi- 
 
 gham. 
 b 7 Wall. 193, Gordon v. U. S. 
 a 9 Wall. 247, ex parte Zellner. 
 
308 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIOJTS. 
 
 UNITED STATES, FIELD v. • See Field v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. FltLEBBOWN, 7 F. 88. 
 
 U. S. departments ; powers ; em- a 15 P. 368, Gratiot v. U. S, 
 
 ployraents by. a o 16 P. 224, Milnor ». Metz. 
 
 Set-offs ; credits, b a 4 H. 112, Gratiot v. U. S. 
 
 o 8 H. 101, U. S. V. Buchanan. 
 a 913. 489, U. S. v. Brown. 
 b 9 Wall. 765, Watkins v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, FTLOK V. See FUor «. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. FISHEB, 2 Cr. 35». 
 
 Priority of the U. S. a 
 Statutes ; constructloa. 
 
 a 2 Wh. 424, Thelusson v. Smith, 
 as 1 P. 434, Conard v. Ins. Co. 
 a 8 P. 273, U. S. v. Hack. 
 a 12 P. 131, Beaston v. Bank. 
 6 3 H. 563, U. 8. v. Freeman. 
 6 4 H. 51, Beals v. Hale. 
 a 12 Wall. 537, Legal Tender Cas. 
 6 23 Wall. 380, Smythe v. Piske. 
 a 92 U. S. 621, Lewis v. U. S. 
 6 99 U. S. 78, D(^gett v. B. R. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. EISK, S Wall. 445. 
 
 Internalrevenue; tax on banks, a [ o 91 U. S. 711, Warren v. Shook. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. FORBES, IS P. 188. 
 
 Florida land titles, a 
 
 Incomplete claims ; want of sur- 
 vey, b 
 
 if land was acquired by the 17. S. 
 as public property, the courts have 
 no jurisdiction, c 
 
 a 16 P. 155, U. S. «). Miranda. 
 
 a 3 H. 618, Chaires v. D. S. 
 
 6 3 H. 784, U. S. v. Kinp. 
 
 a 5 H. 26, U. S. v. Boyd. 
 
 b 11 H. 124, Lecompte v. V. S. 
 
 e 22 H. 280. U. S. v. Garcia. 
 
 b 8 Wall. 660, Magvvire v. Tyler, 
 
 6 17 Wall. 280, Tyler v. Mag wire. 
 b 101 U. S. 707, D'Auterive v.V. S 
 
 See rorsyth v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. FOBTT-THBEE GALLONS WHISKEY, 93 U. S. 188. 
 
 Indians ; right of the U. S. to I a 95 U. S. 209, Bates v. Clark, 
 dispose of the fee of their lands, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. FOSSAT, 80 H. 483. 
 
 UNITED STATES, FOESTTH t. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; sur- 
 veys, a 
 
 Jurisdiction of the District Court 
 under the act of Marcli 3, 1851. 6 
 
 Colonization laws ; grant bjr gov- 
 ernor; overplus, c 
 
 Boundaries of the Fossat grant, c 
 
 UNITED STATES v. FOSSAT, 81 H. 446. 
 
 Sup. Court ; advancing cases, a ) a 93 U. S. 2, Hoge v. K. K. Co. 
 UNITED STATES V. FOX, 95 U. S. 670. 
 Crimes against the U. S. a | a 98 TT. S. 357, IT. S. ». Hall. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. FREEMAN, 3 H. 565. 
 
 a 21 H. 446, U. S. v. Fossat. 
 b 23 H. 442, Castro a. Hendricks. 
 a 23 H. 500, U; S. v. Berreyesa. 
 6 1 Wall. 106, U. S. V. Supelveda. 
 c 1 Wall. 316, U. S. V. D'Aguirre. 
 6 1 Wall. 452, U. S. v. H*leck. 
 d 2 Wall. 705, Fossat Case. ' 
 
 Statutes ; construction ; inten- 
 tion, a 
 
 a 1 Bl. 61, U. 8. V. Babbitt. 
 a 11 Wall. 504, Stewart v. Kohn. 
 a 18 Wall. 301, Atkins v. Disinte- 
 grating Co. 
 a 19 Wall. 427, Tel. Co. v. Eyser. 
 
MANUAL OF STJPRBMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 309 
 
 CTNITED STATES, FREMONT v. See Fremont*. U, S. 
 
 ITNITED STATES v. PKEMONT, 17 H. 653. See Fremont v. XJ. S. 
 
 California land titles; Mexican 
 grants on <!onclition.s. a 
 Execution of mandate. 5 
 Grants; location, c 
 Abandonment of grant, d 
 Mexican laws, e 
 
 a 18 H. 3, U. S. 0. Reading. 
 
 6 18 H. 21, U. S. V. Fremont. 
 
 c 19 II. 363, U. S. V. Sutherland. 
 
 d 22 H. 460, Fuentes v. U. S. 
 
 a 23 H. 317, U. S. v. Jfoe. 
 
 e 10 Wall. 237, Hornsby v. U. S. 
 tlNITED STATES, EtJENTES v. See Faentes i;. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES t. GALBKAITH, 88 H. 89. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; proof a 2 Bl. 401, U. S. v. Galbraith. 
 of possession under the grant ; al- 
 teration of title, a 
 
 UNITED STATES V. GAUBBAITH, 8 BU 394. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; record I a 1 Wall. 745, Bomero ». U. S. 
 evidence, a | 
 
 UNITED STATES, GARNBTT v. See Garnett «. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. GEAB, 3 H. 180. 
 
 U. S. ; povvor to pursue remedies I a 11 H. 231, Cotton ». U. S. 
 same as that of private persons, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES, GIBBONS v. See Gibbons v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, GILBERT T. See Gilbert i;. TJ. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. GILES, 9 Cr. 818. 
 
 U. S.; suits against public officers 
 and sureties on tlieir bonds; cred- 
 its, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GILLIS, 95 U. S, 
 
 Assignments of claims against the 
 U. S.; act of 1853, (10 St. 170.) a 
 
 a 4 Wall. 629, Ware v. U. S. 
 a 6 Wall. 489, U. 8. v. Ecldord. 
 a 9 Wall. 764, Watkins v. U. S. 
 a 101 U. S. 549, R. B. Co. v. U. S. 
 
 . 407. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 395, Erwln v. U. S. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 489, Spofford v. Kirls. 
 a 102 U. S. 558, Goodman w. Nib^ 
 lacl:. 
 
 UNITED STATES v, GILMOBE, 7 WalU 498. 
 
 U. S.; suits against public offl- I a 9 Wall. 765, Watkins v. U. S. 
 cers; credits, a ■ \ 
 
 UNITED STATES T. GIXMORE, 8 'Wall. 330. 
 
 Statutes ; construction, a j a 23 Wall. 382, Smytlie v. Fiske. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GIRAULX, 11 H. 88. 
 
 U.S. courts; rules of decision, a 
 Texa«; pleading in ejectment, b 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, c 
 
 UNITED STATES, GLENN v. See Glenn v. V. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GOMEZ, 83 H. 330. 
 
 a 13 H. 186, Coffee ». Plant. Bank. 
 
 b 14 H. 290, Christy v. Scott. 
 
 c 20 H. 552, Holcombe v McKusiok. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; ap- 
 peals f i-om District Court ; fraud in 
 decree, a 
 
 a 1 Wall. 698, IT. S. i). Gomez. 
 a 9 Wall. 760, U. S. v. Gomez. 
 a 9 Wall. 309, Seo'y v McGarrahan. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GOMEZ, 1 WalL 698. 
 
 Supreme Court ; ap[)eals ; cita- 
 tion; filing transcript, a 
 
 a 3 Wall. 762, U. S. v. Gomez. 
 a 1 Wall. 310, Edmonson w Bloom- 
 shire. 
 a 9 Wall. 309, Sec'yi" McGarrahan 
 a 10 Wall. 426, U. S. v. Vigil. 
 a 99 U. S. 506, Grigsby i). Purcell. 
 
310 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GOMEZ, 3 Wall. 760. 
 
 Supreme Court; mandamus, a \ a7 Wall. 376, ex parte Bradley. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GOODING, 1» Wli. 460. 
 
 as 2 P. 362, Am. Fur Co. v. U. S. 
 b 19 H. 94, U. S. V. Bris Neurea. 
 a 21 H. 164, Barreda v. Silsby. 
 c 2 Wall. 380. Slavers. 
 a 13 Wall. 550, Stockwell ». U. S. 
 d 91 U. S. 438, Nudd v. Burrows. 
 b 96 U. S. 363, U. S. Simmons. 
 
 Agency ; whatever is done by 
 agent v(rithin scope of his authority 
 binding on principal, a 
 
 Indictment; for statutory of- 
 fense ; when sufficient in its descrip- 
 tions. 6 
 
 Slave trade acts; seizures uh- 
 der. c 
 
 Evidence; co-conspirators, d 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GOODWIN, 7 Cr. 108. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of eri-or 
 from Circuit Court in case carried 
 to Circuit Court from District 
 Court, a 
 
 Appeals ; sec. 22 judiciary act. & 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GORDON, 7 Cr. 387. 
 
 Circuit Court ; finality of its I a 12 P. 143, Sarchet v, U. S. 
 judgments, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES, GORDON v. See Gordon v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, GRAHAM v. See Graham v.V.S. 
 UNITED STATES v. GRATIOT, 14, P. 534. 
 
 Title by act of Congress, a I a 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile. 
 
 Territories; power of Congress. 6 | 6 16 H. 181, Cross v. Harrison. 
 UNITED STATES, GRATIOT t. See Gratiot v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. GBOSSMATER, 9 Wall. 78. 
 
 a 7 Cr. 287, U. S. v. Gordon, 
 a 6 P. 490, U. S. ». Nourse. 
 a 12 P. 143, Sarchet v. U. S. 
 b 16 Wall. 342, Merrill v. Petty. 
 
 The civil war; non-intercourse, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. GRUNDT, 3 Cr, 
 
 Shipping; registry act; false cer- 
 tificate, a 
 
 Eevenue ; collection act of 1799 ; 
 when forfeiture takes effect. 6 
 
 Purchaser without notice, c 
 
 UNITED STATES, GRUNER v. See Graner «. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. GUTHRIE, 17 H. 301. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 352, Mitchell v. U. S. 
 a 93 U. S. 612, Desmare v. U. 8. 
 
 337. 
 
 a 3 Wh. 602, The Neptune. 
 6 8 H. 378, Caldwell ». U. S. 
 c 11 Wall. 368, Distilled Spirits. 
 6 14 Wall. 56, Henderson's Spirits 
 
 ns 17 H. 229, U. S. v. Seaman. 
 6 6 Wall. 497, ex parte De Groot. 
 a 7 Wall. 352, Gaines « Thompson 
 a 9 Wall. 312, Sec. v McGarrahan. 
 
 Mandamus of officers of the gov- 
 ernment ; power of the courts of 
 District of Columbia, a 
 
 Remedy for refusal to grant man- 
 damus is by writ of error, b 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HAXl, 6 Cr. 174. 
 
 Embargo law ; violation ; inev- i a 6 Cr. 322, Duronsseau t). U. S. 
 itable necessity, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HAttECK, 1 WaU. 439. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; final- 
 ity of decree of District Court, a 
 Surveys, b 
 
 a 2 Wall. 448, U. S. v. Billing. 
 a 6 Wall. 376, Grisar v. McDowell 
 b 18 Wall. 269, HenshaweBBissell. 
 
 UNITED STATES, HAIXIBURTON V. See HaUiburton v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 311 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HAMTLTON, 3 Dall. 
 
 Habeas corpus ; jurisdiction of 
 Supreme Court. 
 
 17. 
 
 a^ 3 Cr. 448, ex parte Burford. 
 o* 4 Cr. 93, ea; parte Bolman. 
 a 3 P. 201, ex parte Watkins. 
 a 7 P. 570, ea; parte Watkins. 
 a 5 H. 188, ex parte Metzger. 
 a 8 Wall. 98, exparte Yeiger. 
 a 18 Wall. 166, ex parte Lange. 
 S. 843, ea;pa?'ie Virginia. 
 
 imiTED STATES v. HANSON, 16 P. 
 
 Florida land titles, a I 
 
 Spanish survcj's. 6 | 
 
 Incomplete titles, c I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HAKT, 6 'WaU. 
 
 Admiralty ; no jurisdiction of 
 seizures on land, a 
 
 Sup. Court; reversal vvliere court 
 below is without jurisdiction. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HABTWEtL, 6 WaU. 385. 
 
 Offices under the Constitution, a I a 95 U. S. 762, U. S. v, Moore. 
 
 I a 99 U. S. 511, U. S. v. Germaine. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HAWKINS, 10 P. 135. 
 
 alOOU 
 
 801. 
 
 a 5 H. 26, U. S. v. Lawton. 
 6 11 H. 86, U. S. V. Boisdore. 
 c 23 H. 498, Yontz v. IJ. S. 
 
 772. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 511, Morris's Cotton, 
 a 10 Wall. 543, ex parte Graham. 
 & 23 Wall. 164, Stickuey v. Wilt. 
 
 a 4 H. 143, Garland v. Davis. 
 6 8 H. 101, U. S. V. Buchanan. 
 
 Supreme Court; revereal of judg- 
 ments ; venire de novo, a 
 
 Set-offs against U. S. ; unliqui- 
 dated damages, b 
 
 UNITED STATES, HATCKAFT v. See Hayoraft v. V. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. THE HELEN, 6 Cr. 803. 
 
 Penalties; remission; repeal of I a 3 H. 584, Maryland v. K. B. Co. 
 act. a I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HERRON, 80 WaU. 853. 
 
 Bankruptcy ; priority of U. S. a I o 91 U. S. 664, Lamp v. Brass Co. 
 
 I a 92 U. S. 623, Lewis v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HETH, 3 Cr. 413. 
 
 Statutes; retrospective opera- 1 a 17 Wall. 599, Sohn v. Watterson. 
 tion. a I a 20 Wall. 187, Twenty P. Ct. Gas. 
 
 UNITED STATES, HIGUEBAS v. See Higueraa i). U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, HIIX v. See Hill v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. HODGE, 3 H. 634. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals from 
 Supreme Coui-t of the Territory of 
 Florida, a 
 
 Writs of error; return of. h 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HODGE, 6 H. 
 
 U. S.; power to contract, a 
 Suits on bonds of postmasters 
 sureties, h 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HODSON, 10 WaU, 
 
 Duress, a 
 
 Bonds; when good pro tanto 
 estoppel to deny validity, h 
 
 a 6 H. 88, Villabolos v. U. S. 
 6 3 Wall. 50, Castro v. U. S. 
 
 879. 
 
 a 12 H. 102, Neilson v. Lagow. 
 6 13 H. 479, U. S. v. Hodge. 
 
 409. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 74, Mason u. U. S. 
 6 97 U. S. 422, U. S. v. Mora. 
 b 102 U. S. 420, Daniels ti.Tearney 
 
312 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 TNITED STATES v. HOPFMAW, 4 WaU. 158. 
 
 Supreme Court; prohibition, a | a 95 U. S. 73. ex parte Easton. 
 
 triaTED STATES v. HOlIilDAT, 3 WaU. 417. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce, a 
 Indians ; power of U. S. over. 5 
 
 a 92 U. S. 270, Henderson v. Mayor 
 b 93 U. S. 194, U. S. v. 43 Gallons 
 of Whiskey. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HOIiMES, 5 Wh. 418. 
 
 Sup. Court ; jurisdiction in crim- I a 9 H. 571, Forsyth v. U. S. 
 inal cases; certificates of division, a | 
 UNITED STATES v. HOOE, 1 Cr. 318. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writs of error 
 and appeals ; act of 1803. a 
 
 Appeals fi-om Supreme Court of 
 District of Columbia. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HOOE, 3 Cr. 73, 
 
 Priority of U. S. a 
 Mortgage and sale ; difference, b 
 Mortgages for existing debts and 
 future advances, c 
 
 UNITED STATES, THE HOPPET V 
 
 UNITED STATES, HOKNSBY v. See Hornsby v. U. S 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HOWLAJHD, 4 Wi. 108. 
 
 a 2 VVh. 132, The San Pedro. 
 & 5 Wall. 677, Thompson v. Riggs 
 b 93 U. S. 555, Stanton v. Embrey. 
 
 a 2 Wli. 396, Thelusson v. Smith, 
 a 1 P. 4J4, Conard ». Ins. Co. 
 a 12 P. 131, Beaston«. Farm. Bank 
 6 11 H. 392, Fowler v. Merrill, 
 c 23 H. 27, Lawrence v. Tucker. 
 See Hoppet, The, i). U. S. 
 
 U. S. courts; remedies inequity 
 distinct from those given by State 
 laws, a 
 
 Judicial power of U. S.; " cases 
 in equity." b 
 
 Equity jurisdiction, c 
 
 fl! 6 P. 654, Boyle v. Zacharie. 
 a 9 P. 652, Livingston v. Story. 
 a 12 H. 145, Kussell v. Southard. 
 a 13 H. 270, Neves i). Scott. 
 6 20 H. 558, Irvine v. Marshall, 
 c 21 H. 591, Barber v. Barber. 
 a 7 Wall. 430, Payne v. Hook. 
 
 UNITED STATES, HOTT v. See Hoyt v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES V. HUCKAHEE, IC Wall. 434. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 481, Titus v. U. S. 
 b 23 Wall. 162, Stickney v. Wilt. 
 a 92 U. S. 169, Whitfield v. U. S. 
 
 War ; right of conqueror to pub- 
 lic property of the enemy, a 
 
 Sup. Court ; I'eversal where court 
 below was without jurisdicliou. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HUDSON, 10 WaU. 406. 
 
 Public oflicers; bonds; duties I a 14 Wall. 502, U. S. ». Powell, 
 subsequently imposed ; sureties, o | 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HUDSON &, GOODWIN, 7 Cr. 38. 
 
 U. S. courts have no jurisdiction a 1 Wh. 414, U. S. v. Coolidge, 
 
 of common-law offenses, a 6 6 Wall. 488, U. S. u. Eckford. 
 
 Have only the jurisdiction con- a 92 U. S. 216, U. S. v. Reese, 
 
 ierred by Congress. 6 6 98 U. S. 345, U. S. v. Hall. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HUEBTAS, 9 P. 171. 
 
 Florida land claims, a a 13 P. 82, U. S. w. Levy 
 
 Powers of Surveyor-General. 6 a 15 P. 180, U. S. v. Forbes. 
 Grants for raising cattle, c a 15 P. 220, Buick v. U. S. 
 
 a 3 H. 618, Chalres v. U. S. 
 
 6 10 H. 554, Villabolos o. U. S. 
 
 c 15 H. 4, U. S. ». Davenport. 
 
 UNITED STATES, HUGHES v. See Hughes 1). U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPEBME COURT DECISIONS. 318 
 
 UNITED STATES T. HUGHES, 11 H, 
 
 Land titles ; right of a State to 
 file a bill to reform a grant, a 
 Patent conveys the fee. 6 
 
 a 20 H. 246, White v. Burnley. 
 6 4 Wall. 235, Hughes v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. HUGHES, 13 H. 8. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; Spanish I a 13 H. 5, U. S. «. Hughes, 
 grant ; abandonment, a | 
 
 UNITED STATES, HUNTER v. See Hunter v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES, HITLTON v. See Hylton v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. INNERAKITY, 19 Wall. 595. 
 
 Louitiiana ; Spanish land claims ; I a 97 U. S. 223, U. S. ». Watkins. 
 act of 1860. (12 St. 85.) a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. ISHAM, 17 -Wall. 496. 
 
 Stiimps on drafts, a | a 18 Wall. 129, U. S. v. Buzzo. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. JANUARY, 7 Cr. 578. 
 
 Application of payments, a a 1 H. 257, U. S. v. Eckford. 
 
 a 7 EC. 684, Jones v. U. S. 
 a 94 U. S. 489, Nat. Bank ». Bank. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. JOHNSON, 1 WaU. 338. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 358, U. S. v. Auguisola. 
 6 10 Wall. 238, Horusby v. U. S. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; ob- 
 jections against grants, a 
 Eecitals as to preliminary steps.6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON, 17 WaU. 604. 
 
 Statutes ; repugnancy, a | a 96 U. S. 130, Arthur v. Sussfield. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. JONES, 8 P. 375. 
 
 Bonds of public oflBcers ; suits a 15 P. 368, Gratiot v. U. S. 
 against sureties ; accounts ; tran- a 10 H. 132, Hoyt v. U. S. 
 scripts from Treasury, a a 13 H. 47^ U. S. v. Hodge. 
 
 a 17 H. 438, Bruce v. U. S. 
 a 102 U. S. 554, U. S. v. Pinson. 
 
 UNITED STATES, JONES v. See Jones v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES T. JUSTICE, 14 WaU. 535. 
 
 U. S.; suits in Court of Claims; a 17 Wall. 73, Mason v. U. S. 
 when acceptance of a payment bars a 22 Wall. 509, Piatt ». U. S. 
 further claim, a a 92 U. S. 388, Savage v. U. S. 
 
 a 94 tJ. S. 404, U. S. v. Martin. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KEEHLER, 9 WaU. 83. 
 
 Public ofQcers ; liability for mon- | a 13 Wall. 24, Boyden v. U. S. 
 ey deposited ; robbery, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KEIXT, 11 W^t. 417. 
 
 Certificates of division, a | a 3 Wall. 255, Daniels v. K. E. Co. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KEtLT, 15 WaU. 34. 
 
 Army ; soldiers ; desertion ; dis- i a 92 U. S. 78, U. S. v. Landers, 
 charge; bounty, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, KENDAXI. V. See Kendall v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES, KOHL v. See Kohl v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. KEOKUK, 6 WaU. 516. 
 
 U. S. courts ; mandamus to com- I a 9 WaU. 414, Mayor v. Lord, 
 pel levy of tax to pay judgment, a | 
 
314 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. KIMBAXl, 13 TWaU. 636. 
 
 Court of Claims; liabilicy of U.S. I a 14 Wall. 534, Morgan ». U. S. 
 for acts of officers, a \al5 Wall. 207, Keybold v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KING, 3 H. 784, 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; antedated 
 grants; perfect arid imperfect con- 
 cessions, a 
 
 Supreme Court;; writs of error 
 and appeals to Louisiana courts. 6 
 
 Writ of error to State court ; Fed- 
 eral question, c 
 
 Lands of the government are 
 held and sold as lands are held by 
 individuals, d 
 
 UNITED STATES V. KING & COXE, 
 
 Bills of exceptions, a 
 
 U. S. courts; ejectment; recov- 
 ery must be on legal title. 6 
 
 Louisiana land titles; complete 
 and incomplete Spanish grants, c 
 
 Equity and common-law jin-isdic- 
 tion of ij. S. courts must be kept 
 distinct, d 
 
 Facts found by jury; mode of 
 reviewing, e 
 
 Facts found by the court, f 
 
 a 7 H. 844, U. S. v. King. 
 b 8 H. 64, Surgett v. Laplace, 
 c 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 a 9 H. 467, Doe v. Mobile. 
 
 a 11 H. 124, Lecompte v. IT. S. 
 
 d IIH. 567, U. S. M. Hughes. 
 
 a 11 H. 664, U. S. v. Turner. 
 a 8 Wall. 660, Magwire v. Tyler. 
 
 a 37 Wall. 280, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 a 100 U. S. 706, D'Auterive ». U.S. 
 
 7 H. 833. 
 
 a 
 b 
 c 
 c 
 a 
 c 
 
 8 H. 483, Prentice v. Zane. 
 
 10 H. 264, Gilmer v. Poindexter 
 
 11 H. 640, U. S. V. Phil. & N. 0. 
 11 H. 664, U. S. V. Turner. 
 13 H. 195, Weems v. George. 
 17 H. 43, U. S. V. Coxe. 
 
 c 18 H. 540, Arguello v. U. S. . 
 d 20 H. 17, Jones v. McMasters. 
 e 21 H. 167, Barreda v. Silsby. 
 e 1 Wall. 103, Burr v Des Moines 
 e 18 Wall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Folsom 
 f 98 U. S. 442, The Abbotsford. 
 c 101 U. S. 705, D'Autcrive^.U.S. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. KINGStET, 18 P. 476. 
 
 Florida land titles; Spanish grants it 12 P. 215, U. S 
 on conditions. a< 
 
 How far grants were confirmed 
 by the treaty, b 
 
 V. Mills. 
 V. Drummond. 
 V. Burgevin. 
 V. Wiggins. 
 V. Miranda. 
 V. N"oe. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. KIBBT, 7 WaU 
 
 Statutes; general terms in ; con- 
 struction, a 
 
 UNITED STATES V. KIRKPATRICK, 
 
 Official bonds; sureties; laches 
 not imputable to the government, a 
 
 When regulations directory, a 
 deviation cannot be taken advan- 
 tage of by a third person. 6 
 
 Application of payments, c 
 . Pleading; defects; reversal, d 
 
 Government; torts and acts of 
 officers, e. 
 
 Sureties ; prospective bonds. / 
 
 Acts of Commissioner of Internal 
 Revenue when acts of the Secretary 
 of the Treasury, g 
 
 a 13 P. 84; U. S 
 a 13 P. 85, U. S 
 a 14 P. 344, U. S 
 b 16 P. 155, U. S 
 a 23 H. 316, U. S, 
 
 488. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 153, Carlisle v. U. S. 
 a 100 U. S. 244, Gates v. Nat Bank 
 
 9 Wi. 780. 
 
 11 Wh. 184, U. S. V. Vanzant. 
 
 12 Wh. 81. Bank v. Dandridge. 
 12 Wh. 505, U. S. V. Nicholi. 
 
 1 P. 323, Dox V. Post.-General 
 5 P. 304, P^e V. Patton. 
 15 P. 206, U. S. V. Boyd. 
 4 H. 153, Garland v. Davis. 
 
 7 H. 684, Jones v. U. S. 
 
 8 H. 106, U. S. V. Buchiinan. 
 8 Wall. 274, Gibbons v. U. S. 
 
 14 Wall. 502, U. S. v. Powell. 
 91 U. S. 398, Cooke v. U. S. 
 
 94 U. S. 439, Fat. Bankw. Bank 
 
 95 U. S. 318, Hart v. U. S. 
 98 U. S. 489, U. S. v. Thompson 
 
 g IQO U. S. 12, SoiUe v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 315 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KLEIN, 13 Wall 
 
 Pardon ; effect of. a 
 Civil war; enemy's property; 
 captures. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KUtNTOCK, 
 
 a 13 Wall, luo, Armstrong u. TJ. S. 
 a 16 Wall. 152, Carlisle v. U. S. 
 a 22 Wall. 94, Haycraft v. U. S. 
 6 92 U. S. 194, Lamar u. Brown. 
 a 95 U. S. 153, Knote u. U. S. 
 
 5 WU. 144. 
 
 Piracy; murder and robbery on 
 tlie high seas ; jurisdiction of courts 
 of the D. S. a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KNIGHT, 14 P. 
 
 Practice; act 1789; process, a 
 
 Poor debtors; act of Congress 
 January 6, 1800. (2 St. 4.) 6 
 
 U. S. courts; enforcement of 
 State laws, c 
 
 Statutes; when the sovereign is 
 included, d 
 UNITED STATES v. KNIGHT, 1 Bl. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; va- 
 cant land ; power to grant, a 
 Wliat constitutes a title, b 
 Record evidence of. c 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KJSIGHT, 1 Bl. 
 
 Kehearings by Supreme Court, a 
 
 a 5 Wh. 193, U. S. 
 a 5 Wh. 416, U. S. 
 
 V. Pirates. 
 V. Holmes. 
 
 301. 
 
 a 1 H. 304, Duncan w. Darst. 
 6 12 H. 409, Snead «. McCouU. 
 c 13 Wall. 243, exparte McNeil. 
 d 20 Wall. 263, U. S. v. Herrou. 
 
 S43. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 163, U. S. v. Castillero. 
 6 1 Wall. 404, U. S. v. Moreno, 
 c 1 Wall. 745, Eomero v. U. S. 
 
 488. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 6U4, Walker v. Schools. 
 a 14 Wall. 22, Steines v Franklin 
 a 102 U. S. 108, Brooks v E. E. Co. 
 
 185. 
 
 60, Maddox v. U. S. 
 612, Desmare v. U. S. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 
 b 93 U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. LANE, 8 Wall. 
 
 Civil war; permits to trade; 
 pur6hase by Treasury agents, a 
 Illegal purchases of cotton, b 
 
 UNITED STATES v. LAPENB, 17 'Wall. 603. 
 
 War; intercourse, a i a 21 Wall, 
 
 I a 93 U. S 
 UNITED STATES, LAPEYKE v. See Lapeyre u. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. LABKIN, 18 H. 558. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; ap- I a 10 Wall. 238, Hornsby w. U, 
 proval of grant by assembly, a \ ' 
 
 UNIT£ID STATES v. LAUB, 13 B. 1. 
 
 Jury; judges of credibility, a i a 12 P. 427, Strother v. Lucas. 
 
 I a 14 P. 26, Bank v. Guttschliok. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. L,A VENGEANCE, 3 Dall. 397. 
 
 , 352, Mitchell i). U. S. 
 . 612, Desmare v. U. S. 
 
 S. 
 
 Admiralty ; jurisdiction over for- 
 feitures, a 
 
 Seizures on waters navigable from 
 the sea by vessels of ten or more 
 tons ; trial by jury, b 
 
 Judicial notice, c 
 
 a 2 Cr. 406, U. S. v. The Sally. 
 b 4 Cr. 443, U. S. v. The Betsy. 
 b 6 Cr. 112, Whelau k. U. S. 
 a 1 Wh. 10, The Samuel. 
 6 8 Wh. 394, The Sarah. 
 6 9 Wh. 421, The Margaret. 
 c 7 P. 339, Peyroux w. Howard. 
 a 5 H. 452, Waring v. Clarke, 
 a 6 H. 378, N. J. Nav. Co. v. Bank. 
 6 6 Wall. 766, Union Ins. Co. u U.S. 
 6 7 Wall. 638, Tlie Belfast. 
 6 8 Wall. 26, The Eagle. 
 
316 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. lAWBBNCE, 3 DaU. 4a. 
 
 Supreme Court ; tnandaruus. a \a 14 Wall. 166, ea; parte Newman. 
 
 I a 101 U. S. 720, ex parte Ealhvay, 
 
 UNITED STATES V. I-AWSON, 101 V. S. 164. 
 
 Collectors ol customs ; compensa- I a 101 U. S. 170, U. S. v. Ellsworth, 
 tion. a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, lEAVBNWOBTH R. R. v. See Leavenworth E. E. v, U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. JJE BARON, 19 H. 75. 
 
 Public oflScers ; bonds ; com- I a i Wall. 647, U. S. v. Le Baron, 
 mencement of liability; sureties, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. IE BtANC, 18* H. 436. 
 
 Louisiana titles ; Spanish grant ; I a 14 H. 190, U. S. v. Billieux. 
 evidence of heirship, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES, LECOMPTE v. See Iiecompte v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. I,EFEI.EB, 11 P. 86. 
 
 Misjoinder; nolle prosequi, a | a 17 H. 610, GriflSn ©.Reynolds. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. liEVT, 13 P. 83. 
 
 Land titles under Spain ; sur- I a 10 H. 554, Villabolos v. U. S. 
 vey:3. a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, LEWIS v. See Lewis v. United States. 
 UNITED STATES v. LINN, 15 P. 390. 
 
 U. S.; power to contract, a I a 12 H. 102, Ifeilson v. Lagow* 
 Voluntary bonds. 6 I 6 10 Wall. 408, U. S. v. Hodson. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. LINN, 1 H. 118. 
 
 Official bonds; alteration; dis- I a 2 Wall. 231, Smith ». U. S. 
 charge of surety, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, LOCKE v. See Locke v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. LOW, 16 P. 166. 
 
 Florida claims ; Spanish sur- I a 11 H. 86, U. S. v. Boisdore. 
 
 veys. a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES, LUCO V. See Luco v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. LTNDE, 11 WaU. 638. 
 
 Louisiana ; grants by Spain after ( o 97 U. S. 231, TJ. S. «. Watkins. 
 the cession ; act of 1860. a I a 98 U. S. 416, ScuU v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. MACA, 18 H. 556. 
 
 California; Mexican titles ; valid- I a 1 Wall. 404, tj. S. v. Moreno. 
 ity; survey, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MACDANIBL, 7 P. 1. 
 
 U. S.; suits against public offi- 
 cers ; credits ; set-offs ; extra servi- 
 ces, a 
 
 Powers of the departments as to 
 employment. 6 
 
 Statutes; construction by those 
 executing them, c 
 
 a 7 P. 23, U. S. «. Ripley, 
 a 8 P. 160, U. S. e. EingoM. 
 6 15 P. 368, Gratiot «. U. S. 
 a 16 P. 224, Milnor v. Metz. 
 a 4 H. 112, Gratiot v. U. S. 
 a 8 H. 101, TJ. S. ». Buchanan, 
 a 9 H. 489, U. S. 0. Brown. 
 a 7 Wall. 155, The Siren. 
 a 9 Wall. 765, Watkins v. U. S. 
 c 95 U. S. 763, U. S. v. Moore. 
 UNITED STATES v. McDONALD, 5 WaU. 656. 
 
 Collectors of revenue ; compensa- a 23 Wall. 401, Donovan v. U. S. 
 tion. a o 101 U. S. 165, U. S. v. Lawson. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 173, U. S. e. Ellsworth 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 317 
 
 UNITED STATES, McKEE v. See MoKee i'. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, MoLANE v. See McLane v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. McLEAN, 95 XT. S. 750. 
 
 U. S.; salaries, a \alOO IT. S. 685, Embry v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. McL,E]VIOKE, 4 H. 886. 
 
 U. S.; cannot be enjoined ; 
 remedy of parties for breach of 
 contract, a 
 
 a 9 H. 388, Hill v. U. S. 
 
 a 11 H. 287, Beeside v. Wallcer. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 488, U. S. v. Eckford. 
 
 UNITED STATES, McVEIGH v. See McVeigh v.V.S. 
 UNITED STATES, MAXAKIN v. See Malarin v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES t. THE MAXEK ADHEI,, 3 H. 334. 
 
 Proceedings in rem ; forfeiture 
 of oflending thing, a 
 
 Capture of vessels engaged in 
 unlawful enterprise. 6 
 
 a 18 H. 72, Smith v. Maryland. 
 6 18 H. Ill, Jecker ». Montgomery 
 a 7 Wall. 156, The Siren. 
 a 96 U. S. 400, Dobbins's Distil'ry 
 
 UNITED STATES, MANUFACTURING CO. v. See Manuf. Co. v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. MAKCHANT, 13 Wh. 483. 
 
 Jurors ; challenge ; act 1790. (1 1 a 18 H. 589, U. S. v, Shackleford. 
 St. 119.) a I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MAKIGOLD, 9 H. 560. 
 
 Supreme Court ; criminal cases ; 
 certificates of division, a 
 
 When both the State and the U. 
 S. may punish the same act. b 
 
 Constitution ; implied and result- 
 ing powers, c 
 
 UNITED STATES v. THE MAKS, 8 Cr. 417 
 
 a 9 H. 571, Forsyth v. IT. S. 
 b 14 H. 20, Moore v. Illinois, 
 c 12 Wall. 536, Legal Tender Cases 
 6 100 IT. S. 390, ex parte Siebold. 
 
 a 3 Wh. 303, Gelston v. Hoyt. 
 a 8 H. 378, Caldwell v. U. S. 
 6 7 Wall. 460, Confiscation Cases. 
 a 14 Wall. 56, Henderson's Spirits 
 
 Forfeitures for violation of reve- 
 nue laws ; when they attach, a 
 
 Sale to bona-fide purchaser be- 
 fore seizure. 6 
 UNITED STATES, MASON v. See Mason v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES, MEADE v. See Meade v. TJ. S. 
 UNITED STATES, MEKEDITH v. See Mereditli ti. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, MESA v. See Mesa v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, MILI.ER v. See Miller v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. MULS, 7 P. 143. 
 
 Indictments- a | a 92 IT. S. 558, IT. S. v. Cruikshank 
 
 I a 96 IT. S. 363, U. S. v. Simmons. 
 
 UNITED STATES, MINERS' BANK v. See Miners' Banli v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES, MINIS v. See Minis u. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES t. MEBANDA, 16 P. 153. 
 
 Florida land titles, a 
 Incomplete claims. 6 
 
 a 3 H. 618, Chaires v. U. S. 
 6 3 H. 784, U. S. v. King; 
 6 10 H. 554, Villabolos v. U. S. 
 6 11 H. 124, Lecompte v. IT. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MITCHEI.I/, 9 P. 743. See Mitchell u. U. S. 
 
 Government ; has only remedies I a 10 P. 010, Brent n. Bankol Wash, 
 of ordinary suitors, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, MONTAULT v. See Montault v. U. S. 
 
318 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 TOJITED STATES, MONTGOMERY v. See Montgomery v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MORE, 3 Cr. 169. 
 
 Supreme Court ; criminal cases, a 
 
 a 3 P. 201, ex parte Watkina. 
 
 a 9 H. 572, Forsyth v. U. S. 
 
 b 3 Wall. 254, Daniels v. R. E. Co. 
 
 »09. 
 
 a 15 H. 4, U. S. ». Davenport. 
 a 15 H. 32, U. S. v. Koselius. 
 a 15 H. 37, U. S. v. Boselias. 
 
 Appellate jurisdiction. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MOORE, 18 H. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; acts of 
 1824 and 1844; jnrisdiction of Dis- 
 trict Court of Louisiana, a 
 
 UNITED STATES, MOORE v. See Moore v. V. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MORGAN, 11 H. 158. 
 
 Public officers ; liability f o r I a 4 Wall. 185, U. S. v. Dashiel. 
 money stolen ; sureties, a \ ad Wall. 88, U. S. v. Keeliler. 
 
 UNITED STATES, MORGAN v. See MorRan v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MORIILO, 1 Wall. 709. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles; con- | a 11 Wall. 457, Header v. Norton, 
 struction of the act March 3, 1851. a | 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MORRIS, 10 Wh. 346. 
 
 Penalties ; remission of. a 
 
 a 6 P. 423, M'Lane v. U. S. 
 a 3 H. 552. Maryland v. K. R. Co. 
 a 7 Wall. 174, Dorsheimer v. U. 3. 
 a 7 Wall. 461, Confiscation Cases. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MORRIS, 14 P. 475. 
 
 Penal laws ; constrnction. a j a 6 Wall. 396, U. S. v. Hartwell. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MORRISON, 4 P. 184. 
 
 Judgment liens in U. S. courts ; 
 rules of property ; sec. 34 judiciary 
 act ; when the decisions of the 
 State courts will be followed, a 
 
 a 13 P. 477, Burton v. Smith, 
 a 7 H. 764, Massingill ». Downs. 
 a 2 Bl. 438, Ward v. Chamberlain. 
 a 2 Bl. 603, Lefflngwellu Warren. 
 a 91 U. S. 360, Morsell» Nat. Bank 
 
 .803. 
 
 I a 3 H. 204, Taylor v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. MURPHY, 16 P. 
 
 Collection of revenue ; evidence ; 
 competency ; interested party, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. NEI.EIGH, 1 Bl. 305. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; rec- I a 1 Wall. 742, Romero v. U. S. 
 ord and proof of grant, a | 
 
 UNITED STATES, NEW ORLEANS v. See New Orleans v, U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. NEW ORLEANS RATLROAD, 18 Wall. 368. 
 
 a 94 U. S. 
 6 99 U. S. 
 
 609. 
 
 387, Beall v. White. 
 351, Fosdick v. Schall. 
 
 Deeds; conveyance of property 
 subsequently acquired, a 
 
 Railroad mortgages ; what prop- 
 erty passes. 6. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. NICHOLIS, 18 Wh, 
 
 U. S. officers ; accounts, a 
 Sureties on official bonds, b 
 Laches not imputable to U. S. c 
 
 UNITED STATES, NICHOLS v. See Nichols vl U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. NOE, 83 H. 315. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; an- I a 1 Bl. 552, U. S. v. Vallejo. 
 thority to grant, a. \ 
 
 a 15 P. 206, U. S. v. Boyd. 
 6 1 Bl. 149, Bryan v. U. S. 
 c 95 U. S. 318, Hart v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 319 
 
 trtOTED STATES v. NORTON, 97 U. S. 164. 
 
 Laws and proclamations ; at I a 102 U. S. 437, McElrath v. U. S. 
 what time they take effect, a | 
 
 UNITED STATES v. NOTJKSE, 6 P. 470. 
 
 a 9 P. 8, U. S. V. Kourse. 
 a 11 P. 165, U. S. V. Cox. 
 c 18 H. 274, Murray »Hoboken Co. 
 d 1 BI. 489, U. S. V. Knight. 
 
 Treasury distress warrants, a 
 Not subject to appeal by U. S. 6 
 Contemporaneous construction of 
 a law. c 
 Jurisdiction under special acts, d 
 
 tJNITED STATES v'. NXE, 81 H. 409. 
 
 California; Mexican land titles; a 21 H. 412, U. S. v. Bassett. 
 "Sutter's general title." a a 23 H. 261, U. S. v. Bennitz. 
 
 a 23 H. 266, U. S. v. Rose. 
 a 24 H. 131, U. S. v. Ghana. 
 a 1 Bl. 37, U. S. V. Hensley, 
 
 UNITED STATES, O'HARA T. See O'Hara v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES T. O'KEEEE, 11 Wall. 188. 
 
 a 16 Wall. 156. Carlisle v. U. S. 
 a 97 U. S. 63. Young v. U. S. 
 a 99 U. S. 307, Phelps v McDonald 
 
 UNITED STATES T. ORTEGA, 11 Wh. 467. 
 
 Court of Claims ; right of aliens 
 to sue. a 
 
 Supreme Court; original juris- 
 diction ; what is " a case affecting 
 aii ambassador." a 
 UNITED STATES, OSBOBN v. See Osbom v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. OSIO, 83 H. 879. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 594, Blyew v. U. S. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; evi- 
 dence of grant, a 
 Jurisdiction of alcalde. 6 
 Departmental assembly, c 
 
 a 1 Bl. 252, U. S. v. Knight. 
 6 2 Bl. 202, U. S. V. Castillero. 
 a 1 Wall. 745, Romero v. U. S. 
 c 1 Wall. 762, U. S. v. Workman. 
 a 6 Wall. 438, Muraford w.Wardell. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PACHECO, 88 H. 885. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; con- 1 a 23 H. 498, Yontz v. U. S. 
 struction. a I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PADEtFORD, 9 Wall. 631. 
 
 Captured or abandoned property 
 act; 'acts in aid of the rebellion.' a 
 
 Pardon ; effect of. b 
 
 Cotton ; during the civil war, sub- 
 ject of capture, c 
 
 a 13 Wall. 142, U. S. v. Klein. 
 6 16 Wall. 151, Carlisle v. U. S. 
 c 22 Wall. 93, Haycraft v. U. S. 
 c 92 U. S. 192, Lamar v. Brown. 
 6 95 U. S. 153, Knote v. U. S. 
 c 97 U. S. 58, Young v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PALMER, 3 Wh. 610. 
 
 War ; recognition ; political ques- 
 tions, a 
 
 That a ship is commissioned by a 
 regular government; how shown, b 
 
 Robbery on the high seas, piracy, c 
 
 Civil war; sovereign and bellig- 
 erent rights, d 
 
 Statutes; construction, e 
 
 UNITED STATES, 
 UNITED STATES, 
 
 a 4 Wh. 63, The Divina Pastora. 
 
 b 4 Wh. 303, The Estrella. 
 
 a 4 Wh. 501, The Nuestra Senora. 
 
 c 5 Wh. 149, U. S. V. Clintock. 
 
 c 5 Wh. 184, U. S.D. Pirates. 
 
 a 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 b 6 Wall. 12, Mauran v. Ins. Co. 
 
 d 11 Wall. 307, Miller v. U. S. 
 
 e 23 Wall. 380, Smythe v. Piske. 
 
 PAtMER V. See Palmer v. U. S. 
 PARGOUD T. See Pargoud v. V. S. 
 
320 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES, PATTERSON v. See Patterson v. V. S. 
 
 a 21 H. 182, U. S. v. Sntter. 
 
 b 19 Wall. 597, U. S. v. Innerarity. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PATTERSON, IS H. 10. 
 
 Louisiana land tiMes ; Spanish 
 grant ; suit by assignee of claim, a 
 
 Eight of party claiming the land 
 to intervene ; limitations. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES, PAWUNG v. See Pawling v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. THE PEGGY, 1 Cr. 104. 
 
 Penalties; remission of. a la 3.H. 584, Maryland v. E. E. Co. 
 
 Treaties ; law of the land. 6 | & 19 H. 366, Fellows v. Blacksmith. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PERCHEMAN, 7 P. 86. 
 
 Florida land titles; effect of ces- 
 sion of territory on the rights of the 
 inhabitants, a 
 
 Construction of the treaty ; what 
 grants were confirmed. 6 
 
 When copy of Spanish grant, 
 evidence, c 
 
 Locality of grants, d 
 
 Who were anthorized to grant, e 
 
 Wlien assignee of Spanish claim 
 can employ in suit name of original 
 grantee, f 
 
 Title of the U. S. divested by 
 confirmation, g 
 
 Treaties, h 
 
 a 9 P. liiO, Delassus v. U. S. 
 a 12 P. 428, Strother v. Lucas. 
 6 12 P. 511, Garcia v. Lee. 
 c 14 P. 344, U. S. V. Wiggins. 
 d 15 P. 220, Buiek v. U. S. 
 e 15 1'. 229, U. S. v. Delesplne. 
 e 15 P. 328, U. S. v. Delespine. 
 6 16 P. 155, U. S. V. Miranda. 
 6 16 P. 231, U. S. V. Clarke, 
 a 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava, 
 c 15 H. 4, U. S. V. Davenport. 
 a 20 H. 17, Jones v. McMasters. 
 a 20 H. 173, Leiteiisdorfer».Webb. 
 /21H. 182, U. S.v. Sutter, 
 c 24 H. 175, Meelian v. Foi-syth. 
 g 1BI.341, U. S. ». Covilland. 
 a 5 Wall. 260, U. S. v. Eepentigny 
 6 11 Wall. 640, U. S. v. Lynde. 
 h 16 Wall. 434, U. S. v. Hiickabee. 
 a 21 Wall. 527, Langdeau «. Haiies. 
 6101U. S. 706, D'Auterive v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. PEKAITA, 19 H. 343. 
 
 a 20 H. 60, U. S. v. Carabustou. 
 a 22 H. 459, Fuentes v. U. S. 
 6 5 Wall. 461, Serano v. U. S. 
 c 13 Wall. 488, Carpentier v. Mont- 
 gomery. 
 
 California; Mexican title.?; au- 
 thority of oflicer to make tlie grant.a 
 
 What is an equity against the U. 
 S. b 
 
 Titles protected by the treaty, c 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PEREZ, 9 Wh. 579. 
 
 Const.; "twice in jeopardy." a | a 18 Wall. 175, ex paHe Lange. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PETERS, 3 Dall. lai. 
 
 Prohibitions, a a i Wall. 161, U. S. v. Hoffman 
 
 a 10 Wall. 543, ex parte Graliam, 
 a 95 U. S. 71, ex parte Easton. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PETERS, 5 Or. 115. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdiction; where 
 State is a party, a 
 
 Are the judges of the extent of 
 their own jurisdiction, b 
 
 Legislation of a State obstructing 
 the power* of the general govern- 
 ment, void, c 
 
 Supreme Court; mandamus, d 
 
 a 2 H. 550, E. E. Co. v. Letson. 
 6 24 H. 459, Preeman'u. Howe, 
 c 2 Bl. 628, Bank of Com. v. N. Y. 
 c 6 Wall. 195, Eiggs «. Johnson, 
 c 6 Wall. 253, Mayor ». Cooper. 
 d 14 Wall. 166, ex parte Newman. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 321 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PHII,. AND NEW ORLEANS, 11 H. 640. 
 
 a 11 H. 664, U. S. v. Turner. 
 a 18 H. 540, Arguello v. U. S. 
 6 11 Wall. 648, U. S. v. Lvnde. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; complete 
 and incomplete Spanish titles, a 
 
 Grant in disputed territory ; after 
 treaty of St. Ildelfonso. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PHISTEKBR, 94 U. S. 330. 
 
 Army; commntation. a | o 100 U. S. G70, U. S. «. Iiippitt. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. PICO, 33 H. 336. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; when | a 1 Wall. 423, U. S. v. Yorba. 
 conquest was completed, a j a 6 Wall. 590, Stearns v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES, 
 
 , PICO 
 
 See Pico v. V. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. PILtEKIN, 13 H. 9. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; acts of 1824 a 15 H. 36, U. S. v. Roselius. 
 and 1844 conferring jnrisdiotion of 
 claims for land on District Court, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PIRATES, 6 Wh. 184. 
 
 Piracy ; mnrder or. tlie liitrh | a 5 Wli. 416, U. S. ». Holmes, 
 seas; when cognizable by the U.S. l 
 courts, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PO'WBIilj, 14 Wall. 493 
 
 Official bonds; sureties; liability I a 15 Wall. 123 
 for reimbursement of money paid a 100 U. S. 11 
 by government to officer, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. POWER, 11 H. 580. 
 
 Louisiana land titles ; act of July 
 17, 1844; title by occupancy and 
 cultivation, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PRESCOTT, 3 H. 678. 
 
 , U. S. V. Singer. 
 Soule V. U. S. 
 
 a 14 H. 190, U. S. K.'Rilllenx. 
 
 Collectors ; sureties; liability on 
 bond ; paying over money, a 
 
 Liability of public depositaries 
 for money stolen. 6 
 
 a 11 H. 158, U. 
 6 4 Wall. 185, 
 6 9 Wall. 88, 
 b 13 Wall. 24, 
 b 13 Wall. G2, 
 6 15 Wall. 347, 
 
 S. ». Morgan. 
 U. S. V. Dashiel. 
 U. S. V. Keehler. 
 Boyden v. U. S. 
 Bevans v. U. S. 
 U. S. V. Thomas. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. PRICE, 9 H. 90. 
 
 a 15 H. 171, Bispham v. Price. 
 a 15 Wall. 144, Piokersgill v. La- 
 hens. 
 
 Official bonds; proceeding in 
 equity against executor of deceased 
 surety; joint and several bonds, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. QUINCY, 6 P. 466. 
 
 Intention a question for the I a 8 P. 46, Lee v. Lee. 
 
 jury, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, THE RACHEIj v. See RaoUel, The, v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. RAILROAD CO., 17 Wall. 333. 
 Internal revenue ; income tax. a | a 20 Wall. 329, Stoekdale v. Ins. Co 
 When stockholders are exempt. 6 | & 22 Wall. 6i2, Bailey v. E. K. Co. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. READING, 18 H. 1 
 
 California; Mexican land titles; 
 
 approval of grant by departmental 
 
 assembly, a 
 Expediente; definitive title. 6 
 Grants on conditions, c 
 21 
 
 a 18 n. 5.54, U.S. v Cruz Cei-vantes 
 
 6 22 H. 430, Dalton v. V. S. 
 
 a 23 H. 201, U. S. v. Bennitz. 
 
 c 23 H. 317, U. S. V. Noe. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 238, Hornsby v. U. S. 
 
322 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COUKT DECISIONS. 
 
 ■UNITED STATES, KEBD v. See Reed «. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. KEESE, 93 U. S. 816. 
 
 Constitution ; tifteentli amend- a 92 U. 
 mont ; eloctive franciiise. a b 100 U. 
 
 When act can be partly consti- c 100 U. 
 tutional. b 
 
 Eights and imrannitles under the 
 Constitution ; protection by Con- 
 gress, c 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KEID, 12 H. 361 
 
 U. S. courts; evidence; rule of 
 decision, a 
 Certificates of division. 6 
 
 S. 555, U.S.!). Cruiljslianlc 
 S. 98, Trade-mai-Ic Cases. 
 S. 311, Strauder v. W. Va. 
 
 a 1 Bl. 428, Vance ». Campbell. 
 6 7 Wall. 582, U. S.v. Bosenburgh. 
 
 S Wall. 865. 
 
 a 9 Wall. 336, Bennett v. Hunter. 
 b 21 Wall. 63, Schulenbergu.Har- 
 
 rimai). 
 6 92 U. S. 67, Farnsworth v. R.R. 
 6 97 U. S. 21S, McMicken v. V. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KEYNES, 9 H. 187. 
 
 a 9 H. 283. Davis v. Police Jury, 
 a 9 H. 477, Goodtitle ». Kibbc. 
 6 10 H. C20, U. S. V. D'Auterive. 
 c 11 H. 640. U.S.4I. Plill.&]Sr.Orl. 
 a 12 H. 50, Montault v. U. S. 
 6 12 H. 438, U. S. v. Castaiit. 
 a 13 H. 9, U. S. V. Plllerin. 
 a 15 H. 4, U. S. V. Davenport. 
 6 13 H. 32, U. S. V. Roselius. 
 6 11 Wall. 643, U. S. v. Lynde. 
 853. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 10, Thoringtonc. Smith 
 & 9 Wall. 133, The Grapeshot. 
 a 15 Wall. 446, HanaueruWoodniff 
 6 16 Wall. 434, U. S. v. Huckabee. 
 
 . 470. 
 
 a 16 P. 145, U. S. V. Breward. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KIDDIiE, 5 Cr. 313. 
 
 Revenue seizures ; "probable | a 17 Wall. 92, Averill v. Smith, 
 cause." a | a 97 U. S. 646, Stacey v. Emery. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. KINGGOIiD, 8 P. 160. 
 
 U. S.; suits by; set-oB^. a \ a7 Wall. 154, The Siren. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. KIPLEY, 7 P. 18. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. KEPENTIGNT, 
 
 Alienage; "office found." a 
 Conditions subsequent; who can 
 take advantage of non-perform- 
 ance, b 
 
 Land laws ; Spanish concessions 
 in Louisiana after treaty of St. Ildel- 
 fonso. a 
 
 Act May 26, 1824 ; June 17, 1844 ; 
 for settlement of land claims in 
 Louisiana; treaties; construction 
 of. 5 
 
 Perfect grants, c 
 
 UNITED STATES v. RICE, 4 Wh. 
 
 Character of the late civil war ; 
 de facto government, a 
 
 Military occupation ; principles 
 applicable to. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. RICHARD, 8 P 
 
 Florida land titles, a \ 
 
 U. S.; power of departments as 
 to employments ; extra services, a 
 Set-offs ; act March 3, 1797. 6 
 
 a 15 P. 368, Gratiot v. V. S. 
 a 4 H. 112, Gratiot v. V. S. 
 6 8 H. 101, U. S. V. Buchanan, 
 a 9 H. 489, U. S. v. Brown. 
 6 Wall. 765, Watkins v. U. S. 
 .a 91 U. S. 564, Hall v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. RITCHIE, 17 H. 631 
 
 California ; Mexican land titles ; 
 jurisdiction of District Court, a 
 
 Mission lands. 6. 
 
 Board of commissioners under 
 act of 1851. c 
 
 a 17 H. 552, Fremont v. U. S. 
 6 18 fl. 53, U. S. « Cruz Cervantes 
 a 6 Wall. 375, Grisar v. McDowell 
 c 9 Wall. 19, Reese v. U. S. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPEEME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 328 
 
 UNITEaD STATES v. KOBEKTSON, 6 P. 659. 
 
 Set-off; payment with notes of 1 o 6 H. 318, Plant. Bank v. Sharp, 
 creditor, a | a H. 117, Davis ». Tiletson. 
 
 UNITED STATES T. ROBESON, 9 P. 335. 
 
 U. S.; suits by ; set-offs ; torts, a 
 Assignment of claims against tlie 
 U.S. 6 
 
 a 8 H. 101. U. S. ». Buchanan. 
 
 « Wall. 491, U. S. «. Eclvford. 
 a Wall. 76.5, Watkius v. U. S. 
 a 91 U. S. 562, Hall ». U. S. 
 6 95 U. S. 412, U. S. v. Gillis. 
 
 tTNTTED STATES v. RODMAN, 15 P. 135. 
 
 Florida land grants, a | a 15 P. 229, U. S. v. Delespine. 
 
 UNITED STATES, RODRIGUEZ v. See Rodriguez v. V. S. 
 tTNIXED STATES v. ROGERS, 4 H. 573. 
 
 Indians; authority of U. S. over, ai a 11 Wall. fil9, Cherokee Tobacco. 
 
 I a 17 Wall. 242, Holden ». Joy. 
 
 UNITED STATES, ROMERO v. See Romero v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. ROSE, 33 H. 863. 
 
 California ; Mexican land titles ; i a 24 H. 131, IT. S. v. Chana. 
 "Sutter's general title." a | a 1 Bl. 37, U. S. u. Hensley. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. ROSEI.IUS, 15 H. 33. 
 
 Louisiana titles; jurisdiction of 
 the District Court of Louisiana, a 
 
 Spanish grant ; satisfied conces- 
 sion . 6 
 
 Perfect titles, c 
 
 UNITED STATES v. ROSBNBUBGH 
 
 Naturalization laws ; offenses 
 against, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; certificates of 
 division in criminal cases. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. ROSS, 93 U. S. 381 
 
 a 15 H. 4, TJ. S. v. Davenport. 
 
 6 18 H. 540, Arguello v. U. S. 
 
 c 14 Wall. 312, Dent v. Emmerger 
 
 7 Wall. 580. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 91, U. S v. Tynen. 
 6 13 Wall. 252, U. S. v. Avery. 
 
 Captured or abandoned property 
 act. a 
 Circumstantial evidence, b . 
 
 UNITED STATES v. RUSSELt, 13 Wall. 637. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 271, U. S. ». Puojh. 
 6 100 IT. S. 69S, Manning u Ins. Co 
 
 a 13 Wall. 646, U. S. u. Kimball. 
 a 94 U. S. 234, Cammeyer«. New- 
 ton. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. THE SALIY, 3 Or. 406. 
 
 U. S.; liability for seizures of 
 property during the civil war. a 
 
 a 4 Cr. 452. U. S. v. The Betsy. 
 6 8 Wh. 394, The Sarah, 
 c 5 H. 451, Waring w. Clarke. 
 6 8 Wall. 26, The Eagle. 
 
 Admiralty; jurisdiction of seiz- 
 ures on navigable waters, a 
 
 In admiralty, ti-ial is by court 
 (but sec act of 1875). h 
 
 Slave trade acts, c 
 UNITED STATES, SALAMON v. See Salamon i). U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, SCUtL v. See Scull D. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. SEAMAN, 17 H. 235. 
 
 Mandamus ; executive officers ; i a 7 Wall. 352, Gaines «. Thompson 
 discri'tionary powers, a I a 9 Wall. 312, Sec. v. McGarraliau. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. SEGUI, 10 P. 306. 
 
 Florida land title? ; grants on I a 12 P. 479, U. S. u. KJngsley. 
 conditions, a j a 15 P. 135, U. S. v. Eodman. 
 
324 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES, SEMMES v. See Semmes v. XJ. S. 
 USTITED STATES, SERRANO v. See Serrano v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. SETON, 10 P. 309. 
 
 Florida land titles, a [ a 16 P. 145, U. S. v. Breward. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. THE SHORT 8TAPX.E, 9 Cr. 56. 
 
 Embargo act. a. | a 2 Wh. 152, The King William, 
 
 UNITED STATES v. SIBBAXD, lO P. 313. 
 
 Florida land titles ; grants on 
 conditions, a 
 Supreme Court; mandates. 6 
 
 a 12 P. 479, IT. S. v. Kingsley. 
 b 12 P. 491, Sibbald v. U. S. 
 a 15 P. 220, Bnick v, V. S. 
 a 16 P. 145, U. S. V. Breward. 
 a 16 P. 198, U. S. V. Hanson. 
 a 16 P. 231, U. S. V Clarke, 
 ti 1 H. 24, U. S. V. Acosta. 
 a H. 26, U. S. v. Lawton. 
 a 97 U. S. 216, McMicken v. U. S, 
 UNITED STATES v. SIMMS, 1 Cr. 866. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeals from I a 3 Cr. 172, U. S. v. More. 
 District of Columbia, a | 
 
 UNITED STATES V. SINGER, IS Wall. 800. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 200, Pahlman u Colleet'r 
 6 100 U.S. 11, Sonle jj. U. S. 
 
 ■Revenue ; tax on distilleries, a 
 Sureties on official bonds ; lia- 
 bility, b 
 
 UNITED STATES v. 67 PACKAGES OF DRY GOODS, 17 H. 93. 
 
 Laws ; repeals by implication, a | a 22 H. 311, U. S. v. Walker, 
 
 UNITED STATES v. SMITH, 5 WU. 163. 
 
 a 5 Wh. 193, U. S. v. Pirates. 
 6 9 H. 571, Forsyth v. V. S. 
 
 Piracy, a 
 
 Criminal jurisdiction ; Supreme 
 Court. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES v. SMITH, 9 Wh. 438. 
 
 Duties ; importations ; names by i a 92 U. S. 471, Tyng v. Grinnell, 
 which classed, a \ ' 
 
 UNITED STATES, SMITH T. See Sraitli v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, SOULARD v. See Soulard v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. SOUTHMAYD, 9 H. 638. 
 
 Duties ; value of importations ; I a 24 H. 525, Belcher v. Linn, 
 how ascertained ; parol evidence, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES, SPEAKE v. See Speake i>. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES, SPROTT v. See Sprott v. V. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. STANSBURY, 1 P. 573. 
 
 Official bonds ; sureties, a 
 When release of debtor releases 
 the judgment, b 
 
 UNITED STATES v. STATE BANK OP N. C, 6 P. 89, 
 
 a 5 P. 181, Hunter w. U. S. 
 
 6 15 H. 296, Magniac v. Thompson. 
 
 a 12 P. 131, Beaston v. Par. Bank. 
 6 95 U. S. 763, U. S. v. Moore. 
 
 Priority of U. S. a 
 Construction of statutes by those 
 executing them. 6 
 
 UNITED STATES, STOCKWELI, v. See Stoekwell v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. STONE, 14 P. 624. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 
 a 6 H. 43, Nesmith v. Sheldon. 
 
 a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Chicago. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 255, Daniels v. S. K. Co. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 325 
 
 UNITED STATES v. STONE, » -Wall 
 
 Patents ; vacating ; equity, a 
 Land office ; jurisclictioii ceases 
 on Issue ol patent. 6 
 
 sss. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 440, Mowryu. Whitney 
 a 96 U. S. 533, Moore w. Kobbins. 
 6 102 U. S. 396, U. S. u. Scliiirz. 
 
 UNITED STATES, SUPERTISOBS v. See Supervisors ■!). XT. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. SUTTER, «1 H. 170. 
 
 California; Mexican land titles; 
 U. S. has no interest in contests be- 
 tween persons after the grant, a 
 
 Title of U. S.; when divested. 6 
 
 Power to grant, c 
 
 Cultivation and inhabitancy, d 
 
 Boundary of grant to Sutter, e 
 
 a 23 H. 442, Castro v. Hendricks. 
 6 1 Bl. 341, U. S. V. Covilland. 
 e 1 Bl. 552, U. S. v. Vallejo. 
 c 2 Bl. 612. U. S. u. Grimes. 
 & 1 Wall. 423, U. S. -o. Yorba. 
 e 2 Wall. 581, Sutter Case, 
 e 10 Wall. 237, Hornsby u. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES, SWEENY v. See Sweeny «.'U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, TATTLOR v. See Taylor v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. TENBROCK, % TVIl. 248, 
 
 Circuit Court ; when no appeal a 12 P. 144, Sarchet r>. U. S, 
 lies in case removed from the Dis 
 irict Court, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. TESCHMAKBR 
 
 California ; Mexican land <titles ; 
 evidence of grant ; record title, a 
 
 UNITED STATES T. THROGJVIORTON 
 
 Judgments; fraud, a 
 Fraud in land titles; relief in 
 equity. 6 
 
 UNTTED STATES V, TINOET, 5 P. 116. 
 
 .Official bonds; obtained by op- 
 pression under color of office ; sure- 
 ties, a 
 
 U.S.; power to contract ; volun- 
 tary bonds, h 
 
 When bond prospective, c 
 
 as H. 401. 
 
 a 22 H. 415, U. S. o Pico. 
 a 22 H. 421, U. S. «. Vallejo. 
 a 1 Bl. 252. U. S. e. Knight. 
 a 1 Wall. 357, U. S. «. Auguisola. 
 a 1 Wall. 422, U. S. u. Yorba. 
 a 1 Wall. 742, Komero v. IT. S. 
 
 98 U. S. 61. 
 a 101 U. S. 479, Marqucz u. Frisbie 
 6 101 U. S. 520, Vance ». Burbank. 
 
 a 10 P. 357, U. S. ». Bradley. 
 6 15 P. 311, U. S. D. Linn. 
 B 7 H. 581, Tyler v. Hand. 
 & 12 H. 102, Jfeilson u. Lagow. 
 h 10 Wall. 406, U. S. v. Hodson. 
 c 14 Wall. 502, U. S. v. Powell. 
 
 UNITED STATES, TITUS V. See Titus v. U. S. 
 
 663. 
 
 a 17 H. 43, U. S. v. Coxe. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. TURNER, 11 H. 
 
 Ixiulsiana land titles; complete I 
 and incomplete Spanish grants, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. 300 CHESTS OF TEA, 9 Wh, 438 
 
 Duties ; construction of tariff 
 acts, a 
 
 Whether the article imported is 
 known by the name given in the 
 tai'iff a question for the jury. 6 
 
 a 7 P. 404, Barlow v. U. S. 
 a 10 P. 150, Elliott «. Swartout. 
 h 7 H. 790, Lawrence v. Allen. 
 b 91 U. S. 363, Arthurs. Cumming. 
 b 96 U. S. Ill, Arthur w. Morrison. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. TTtBR, 7 Cr. a8S. 
 
 Sup. Court; criminal jurisdic- 1 a 9 H. 571, Forsyth «. U. S. 
 tion ; certificates of division, a \ 
 
326 
 
 MANUAL OF STTPKBME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. TTKEN, 11 Wall. M.. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 657, Hendei-son's To- 
 bacco. 
 
 a 17 Wall. 431, State jr. Stoll. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 617, Mnrclocktr Memphis 
 
 a96U. S. 140, Ai-thui-j). Homer. 
 
 b 98 U. S. 401, R. R. Co. v. Grant. 
 UNITED STATES, UNION ESS. CO. v. See Union Ins. Co. v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. UNION PAC. R. K. CO., 91 U. S. 7Z. 
 
 Statutes ; construction ; repug- 
 nancy ; ivpeal by Implication, a 
 
 Repeal of law conferring juris- 
 diction ; pending cases, b 
 
 Obligations of the Union Pacific 
 B. R. Co. toward tlie U. S. a 
 
 a 98 U. S. 614, U. S. v. IT. P. K. R. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 60, Piatt v. U. P. R. R. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 719, Sinliing-FnuflCases 
 UNITED STATES, UN. PAC. K. K. CO. v. See Union Pac. E. E. Co. v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. UNION PAC. K. K. CO., 9S U. S. 601. 
 
 Pacific railroads ; relation toward | a 99 U. S. 724, Sinking-Fund Cases 
 
 the U. S. a ! 
 
 UNITED STATES V. VACA, IS H. 55R. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; ap- 1 a 10 Wall. 238, Horosby v. U. S. 
 proval of grant by assembly, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. VALI^EJO, 1 Bl. S41. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; record 
 evidence, a 
 Modes of making grants, b 
 
 a 1 Wall. 745, Romero v. U. S. 
 b 1 Wall. 762, U. S. u. Workman. 
 b 13 Wall. 452, U. S. v. Vigil. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. VANZANT, 11 Wh. 184. 
 
 Directory regulations ; cannot be 
 taken advantage of by third per- 
 sons, a 
 
 Official bonds; laches not impu- 
 table to government; sureties, b 
 
 Government ; how far responsible 
 for acts of officers, c 
 
 UNITED STATES, VltLABOLOS v. 
 UNITED STATES v. VOWEIX, 6 Cr. 
 
 Duties; what constitutes an im- 
 portation, a 
 
 UNITED STATES v. WAIKER, 23 H. 
 
 Statutes; repeal by implication, a 
 Collectors; compensation under 
 act March, 1841, (5 St. 432.) 6 
 
 a 12 Wli. 81, B.ink v. Diindi-idge. 
 b 12 Wh.505, U. S. v. Niclioll. 
 b 1 P. 333, Dox V. P()si;r-Gen. 
 &15P. 20S, U. S. ». Bovd. 
 <; 8 H. 106, U. S. v. Buolianan. 
 b 18 Wall. 6&3, Jones v. V. S. 
 6 95 U. S. 318, Hart v. U. S. 
 See ViUaboloB v. U. S. 
 
 sa». 
 
 a 9 Cr. 119, Arnold v. U. S. 
 a 13 P. 494, Meredith v. U. S. 
 a 9 H. 377, Harrison v. Vosc. 
 a 8 Wall. 120, Waring u. Mayor. 
 
 311. 
 
 a 3 Wall. 633, The Reform. 
 b 5 Wall. 651, U. S. v Macdonald. 
 b 23 Wall. 400, Donovan v. U. S. 
 b 101 U. S. 165, U. S. V. Lavvson. 
 
 UNITED STATES, WAtKEK v. See W.ilker v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES, WALTON v. See Walton v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES, WARD v. See Ward u. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. WEED, 5 Wall. 62. 
 
 Admiralty ; seizure of vessel for 
 Violation of law. a 
 
 Prize court ; maritime torts. & 
 
 The civil war; permits to pur- 
 chase cotton, c 
 
 "Maritime prize;" act July 2, 
 1864, (13 St. 377.) d 
 
 a 6 Wall. 93, The Watchful. 
 6 7 Wall. 161, The Siren, 
 c 9 Wall. 778, Butler !). Maples. 
 d 10 Wall. 582, The Cotton Plant. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 327 
 
 UNITED STATES V. WEST, 33 H. 315. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; alter- | a 2 Bl. 406, U. S. v. Galbraitli. 
 atiou of grant, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES, WESTKAY v. See "Westray v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. WHITE, 83 H. 849. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; evi- I a 1 Bl. 502, "White u. U. S. 
 dence; opposing claimants, a I 
 
 UNITED STATES, WHITESIDE v. See Whltestde v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. WIGGINS, 14 P. 345 
 
 Florida land titles, a 
 What claims protected by the 
 treaty. 6 
 Complete titles, c 
 Grants on conditions, d 
 Tncoraplete titles, e 
 Prima-facie evidence, f 
 
 a 15 P. 135, U. S. V. Rodman. 
 
 a 15 P. 229, U. S. v. Dele?pine. 
 
 a 15 P. ,S2S, U. S. V. Delespine. 
 
 a 16 P. 145, U. S. V. Bievvard. 
 
 ffl 16 P. 198, U. S. V. Hanson. 
 
 a 1 H. 24, U. S. V. Aoosta. 
 
 b 2 H. 372, Cliontean v. Eckart. 
 
 a 5 H. 26, U. S. v, Lavvton. 
 
 c 9H.443, Doet). Eslava. 
 
 d 13 H. 252. Glenn v. U. S. 
 
 e 8 Wall. 652, Mao-iiire v. Tyler. 
 
 e 17 Wall. 274, Tvler v. Magwire. 
 
 / 97 U. S. 268, Lilienthall's To- 
 bacco, 
 
 c 98 U. S.,204, Snyder v. Sickles. 
 c 101 U. S. 706, D'AuterivcK.U.S. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. WILET, 11 Wall. 513. 
 
 Limitations; suspension during I a 11 Wall. 504, Stewart v. Kalni. 
 the civil war. a | a 92 U. S. 115, Harrison v. Myer. 
 
 UNITED STATES v. WXLKINS, 6 Wh. 135. 
 
 Public oIGcers ; suits against ; 
 credits and set-offs, a 
 
 Contracts; condition providing 
 for a valuation. 6 
 
 a 7 P. 23, U. S. V. Kipley. 
 a 7 P. 42, U. S. V. PiUebrown. 
 ffl 10 P. 129, U. S. V. Hawkins, 
 ffl 15 P. 368, Gratiot v. U. S. 
 a 4 H. 110, Gratiot v. U. S. 
 a 8 H. 101, U. S. V. Buchanan, 
 ffl 9 Wall. 765, Watkins v. U. S. 
 6 20 Wall. 29, HnmastonuTel.Co 
 
 UNITED STATES v. WILMAMSON, 23 Wall. 411. 
 
 Army; pay of officers while I ffl 94 U. S. 221, U. S. «. Phisterer. 
 awaiting orders, ffl I 
 
 UNITED STATES v. WIXSON, 7 P. 154 
 
 Certificates of division ; upon 
 what points granted, a 
 Pardon, h 
 
 UNITED STATES V. WILTBEKGEB; 
 
 Penal laws; construction, ffl 
 Certificates of division in criminal 
 
 cases, b 
 Constitution ; treason ; "aid and 
 
 comfort." c 
 
 ffl 10 P. 288, Davis v. Braden. 
 
 6 18 H. 308, ex parte Wells. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 582, U. S. «.Eosenbnrgh 
 
 5 Wh. 56. 
 
 a 2 P. 362. Am. Fur Co. v. U. S. 
 a 14 P. 473, U. S. v. Morris. 
 b 9 II. 571. Forsyth v. U. S. 
 a 6 Wall. 390. U. S. v. Hartwell. 
 a 11 Wall. 620, Cherokee Tobacco. 
 a 21 Wall. 491. Texas v. While 
 ffl 92 U. S. 219, U. S.v. Keesi-. 
 o92 U. S. 021, Lewis !i. U. S. 
 c 97 U. S. 62. Young v. U. S. 
 
328 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 tnSflTED STATES, WINSTON v. See Winston d. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, WITHENBURT t. See Witlienbury v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. WOOD, 14 P. 430. 
 
 Forgery, a | o 16 P. 357, Wood v. U. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES, WOOD v. See Wood v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES T. WORKMAN, 1 WaU. 745. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; Mis- | a 3 Wall, 491, Beard v. Federy. 
 sioii lands, a \ 
 
 UNITED STATES v. TATES, 6 H. 608. 
 
 Jurisdiction of person ; appear- a 20 H. 206, Carroll v. Dorsey. 
 ance ; waiver of citation, a a 20 Wall. 7, Habich v. Folger. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 12, Creighton v. Kerr. 
 UNITED STATES, TEATON v. See Yeaton v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES, TONTZ v. See Yontz v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. YOKBA, 1 Wall. 483. 
 
 California ; Mexican titles ; when I a 6 Wall. 590, Stearns v. U. S. 
 conquest became complete, a \ alO Wall. 238, Hornsby v. TJ. S. 
 
 UNITED STATES V. YOUNG, 94 U. S. 358. 
 
 Court of Claims ; new trials, a | o 95 U. S. 643, Young v. U. S. 
 UNITED STATES, YOUNG v. See See Young v. V. S. 
 UNITED STATES v. YULEE. See U. S. v. Yates. 
 
 UNITED STATES INS. CO., MOREAN v. See Morean v. V. S. Ins. Co. 
 UNIYERSAX INS. CO., McLANAHAN v. See MoLanahan v. Universal Ins. Co. 
 UNIVERSAX INS. CO., SMITH v. See Smith v. Universal Ins. Co. 
 UNIVERSITY V. PINCH, 18 WaU. 106. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; judgment against 
 parties voluntarily absenting them- 
 selves in the Confederacy, a 
 UPSHAW, BUCHANNON v. See Buoliannon v. Upshaw. 
 UPTON, PUHMAN V. See Pullman v: Upton; 
 UPTON, SANGER v. See Sanger v. Upton. 
 UPTON V. TBEBILCOCK, 91 U. S. 45. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 489, Montgomery v. 
 Samory. 
 
 Corporations ; liability of stock- 
 holder on subscription, a 
 
 a 91 U. S. 64, Sanger v. Upton. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 65, Webster v. Upton. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 667, Chubb v. Upton. 
 
 a 96 U. S. 330, Pullman v. Upton. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 316, Hawley v. Upton. 
 UPTON, WEBSTER v. See Webster u. Upton. 
 UBE V. KAUEFMAN, 19 H. 56. 
 
 Admiralty ; collisions on navi- 
 gable rivers, a 
 
 Collision with vessel at anchor. 6 
 USHER, BUTTERFIEID v. See Butterfleld v. Usher. 
 UTLEY V. DONAXDSON, 94 U. S. 39. 
 
 a 20 I-l. 297. Jackson v. Magnolia. 
 b 97 U. S. 315, Virginia Ehrmau. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 50, Nat. Bank ». Hill. 
 6 101 U. S. 396, Whitney BWyman 
 
 Contracts ; mistake, a 
 
 Can only be changed by mutual 
 assent. 6 
 VACA, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Vaca. 
 VALIANDIGHAM, EX PARTE, 1 Wall. 351. 
 
 Supreme Court; appellate juris- I a 94U. S. 259, U. S. v. Youns 
 diction, a \ 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 329 
 
 VAilEJO, tr. S. V. See U. S. v. Vallejo. 
 
 VAUETTE, CANAIi CO. v. See White Water Valley Oanal Co 
 
 . Vallette. 
 
 VAILET CO., HOMESTEAD CO 
 VAN AXI.EN V. ASSESSORS, 3 Wall 
 
 National banks ; taxation by the 
 States, a 
 
 National securities. 6 
 
 Corporations ; shares ; nature 
 of. c 
 
 See Homestead Co. v. Valley Co. 
 573. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 255, People v. Com'rs. 
 
 a 4 Wall. 4G2, Bradley v. People. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 630, Prov. Inst. v. Mass. 
 
 6 7 Wall. 698, Austin v. Alclcrnien 
 
 a a Wall . 474. Lionberger v Konse 
 
 a 9 Wall. 590, Thompw)n v. R. R 
 c 18 Wall. 230, Del. R.R. Tax Case 
 a 94 U. S. 418, People v. Com'rs. 
 c 95 U. S. 087, Farrington uTenn. 
 
 V. See Erskine v. Van Arsdale. 
 
 See Warren v. Van Brunt. 
 
 VAN ABSDAXE, EKSKINE 
 VAN BBUNT, ■WARREN v. 
 VAN BUREN v. DIGGES, 11 H. 461 
 
 Contracts; failure of cousitlera- 
 tion; equitable (lefen.ses ; mitiga- 
 tion of damages, a ' 
 VAN BUSKIRK, GREEN v. See Green v. Van Busklrk 
 VANCE V. CAMPBELl, 1 Bl. 430. 
 
 U. S. courts; rules of evidence 
 prescribed by the laws of a State ; 
 rules of decision, a 
 
 Patent law ; infi-ingement. 6 
 
 Combinations, c 
 
 a 14 H. 442, Winder v. Caldwell. 
 
 1 Wall. 68, Rj'an v. Bindley. 
 15 Wall. 194, Gould v. Rees. 
 21 Wall. 25, Gill v. Wells. 
 .23 Wall. 367, Reedy v. Scott. 
 94 U. S. 202, Dunbar v. Myer.s. 
 94 U. S. 297, Fuller v. Yentzor. 
 96 U. S. 554, Schnmaclier ». 
 Cornell, 
 a 102 U. S. 165, Potter u Nat. Bank 
 
 VANCE, DUPONT v. See Dupont v. Vance. 
 VANDEWATEB v. MrLlS, 19 H. 90. 
 
 Shipping; carriers ; lien on ves- 1 a 24 H. 392, Buckley ». Nanrakeag. 
 sel; affreightment, a \a 9 Wall. 452, Maggie Hammond. 
 
 VAN.DUSEN, COLLAR CO. v. See Collar Co. «. Van Dusen. 
 VAN HOFFMAN v. QIJINCY, 4 Wall. 535, 
 
 County and municipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads; act autliorizing 
 levying of tax in payment; power 
 of Legislature to repeal ; Constitu- 
 tion ; impairing contract, a 
 
 Mandamus by Circuit Court to 
 compel levy ol tax to pay judg- 
 ment. 6 
 
 a o Wall. 708, Galena v. Amy. 
 a Wall. 194, Riggs v. Johnson. 
 6 6 Wall. 482, Walkley v. Musca- 
 tine. 
 b 7 Wall. 012, Morgan «. Town, 
 ft 8 Wall. 584, Butz v. Muscatine. 
 b 9 Wall. 417, Superv's v. Durant. 
 a 13 Vv^all. 6.')3, White v. Hart, 
 a 13 Wall. 656, Osborn v Nicholson 
 a 1") Wall. 624, Gunn v. Barry. 
 a 16 Wall. 232. Davis v. Gray, 
 a 16 Wall. 318, Walker uWliitehead 
 6 19 Wall. 120, Reesv. Watertown. 
 b 19 Wall. 657, Heine v. Com'rs. 
 a 21 Wall. 498, Erie R. R. v. Penii. 
 o95 U. S. 683. Farrington u.Tenn. 
 a 96 U. S. 74, Tenn. v. Sneed. 
 a 96 U. S. 600, Edwards v Kearzey 
 6 98 U. S. 398, U. S. v. Now Orl. 
 a 99 U. S. 628. Com'rs v. Sellew. 
 alOOU.S. 532, MtPleasu. Beckwith 
 
330 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 VAN HOSTRUP V. MADISON, 1 Wall. 291. 
 
 County and mnnicipal bonds in 
 aid of railroads ; non-performance 
 of conditions in the act; estoppel; 
 bona-fide holders; recitals, a 
 
 VAN NESS V. BUEI,, 4 Wh. 75. 
 
 Collectors ; when right to penal- 
 ties and forfeiture accrues, a. 
 
 VAN NESS V. HYATT, 13 P. 896. 
 
 Execution ; eqnitable interests, a 
 District of Columbia; law gov- 
 erning. 6 
 
 a 1 Wall. 390, Meyer v. Muscatine 
 a 9 Wall. 414, Mayer v. Lord. 
 a 13 Wall. 305, Pendleton v. Amy. 
 a 92 U. S. 492, C'oloma v. Eaves. 
 
 a 10 Wh. 240, U. S. v. Morris. 
 
 alOH. 132, HoytB. U. S. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 461, Conflscation Cases. 
 
 a 16 H. 599, Calvert v. Bradley. 
 6 91 tr. S. 359, Morsell v. Baiik. 
 
 VAN NESS V. PACARD, 8 P. 141. 
 
 Jury; judges of the evidence, a | a 95 U. S. 239, Ins. Co. v. Rodel. 
 
 VAN NESS V. VAN NESS, 6 H. 68. 
 
 Issues from chancery ; review I a. 7 li. 227, McLauglilin v. Bank, 
 of. a I a 4 Wall. 170, Brown v. Wiley. 
 
 VANNEVAR t. BRYANT, 81 Wall. 43. 
 
 Eemovals; act of 1867. 
 "Final hearing." 6 
 
 a 94 U. S. 651, Lowe v. Williams. 
 a 99 U. S. 147, B. R. v. MoKiiilev 
 6 102 U. S. 180, Jifkinsu.Sweatzer 
 
 VAN NORBEN v. MORTON, 99 r. S. 378. 
 
 U. S. courts; enforcement of ] a 101 U. S. 157, Cummings y. Bank 
 
 State laws, a \ 
 
 VAN ORDEN, CAPKON v. See Capron v. Van Orden. 
 VAN RENSEtEAR v. WATTS, 7 H. 784. 
 
 Supreme Court ; docketing case ; I a 94 U. S. 254, R. E. v. Nat. Banlj 
 clerk's costs, a I a 102 U. S.- 576, Edwards v. U. S. 
 
 VAN RENSSEIEAR v. KEARNEY, 11 H. 388. 
 
 Estoppels by deed, a 
 U. S. courts; when bound by de- 
 cisions of the State courts. 6 
 
 a 18 H. 83, Bush v. Cooper. 
 a 21 H. 240, French v. Spenser. 
 a 1 Bl. 355, Crews v. Burcham. 
 a 2 Bl. 603, liCfflnj^well u. Warren. 
 a 22 Wall. 573, Tuclver v. Ferguson 
 
 VAN RIENSDYK, CLARK v. See Clark v. Van Eienadyk. 
 
 VAN RISWICK, WALLACE v. See Wallach v. Tan Eiswiok. 
 
 VAN ROEDER, CHANDLER v. See Chandler v. Boeder. 
 
 VAN SYCKLE, RAY v. See Eay 1). Tan Syckle. 
 
 VAN WORMER, HAILBS v. See Hailes v. Tan Worraer. 
 
 VAN ZANDT, JONES v. See Jones v. Tan Zandt. 
 
 VANZANT, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Tan Zant. 
 
 VASQUEZ, CHASE v. See Chase v. Tasquez. 
 
 VASSE, COMBYGS v. See Oomeygs v. Tasse. 
 
 VASSE V. SMITH, 6 Cr. 833. 
 
 Bills of exceptions, a I a 11 H. 158, U. S. v. Morgan. 
 
 Instructions. 6 | 6 20 Wall. 162, Ins. Co. «. Baring. 
 
 VATTIER, HINDE v. See Hinde v. Tattler. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 331 
 
 VATTIEK V. HrNBE, 7 P. 863. 
 
 Bona-fide purchaser; wliat plea 
 of. a 
 
 Parties ; formal, b 
 VATTIEK, PIATT v. See Piatt v. Vattier, 
 VAUGHAN V. NOKTHUP, 15 P. 1. 
 
 Executors; settlement of ac- 
 counts; liabilitj- of successors, a 
 
 Where to be sneO. 6 
 
 U. S.; debts due from U. S. liavo 
 no locality, c 
 VAUGHAN, SailTH v. See Smitli d. Tiiughan. 
 VEAZIE, I.OED V. See Lord v. Teazie. 
 VEAZIE V. MOOR, 14 H. 568. 
 
 Tiio Mississippi ; free naviga- 
 tion, a 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; naviga- 
 bility. 6 
 
 States no right to obstruct the 
 navigation of tlie rivers, c 
 
 Constitution ; commerce, d 
 
 VEAZIE V. WABIIEIGH, 11 P. 55. 
 
 Supreme Conrt ; appeals ; dis- 
 continuance, a 
 
 VEAZIE V. WELLIAMS, 8 H. 134. 
 
 Fraudulent sales ; i-estoration ; 
 depreciation, a 
 
 VEAZEE BAIfK v. FENTSO, 8 Wall. 
 
 Constitution ; power of govern- 
 ment to tax pieans employed bj"' 
 the States ; tax on State banks, a 
 
 Direct taxes ; income tax. 6 
 
 a 10 P. 212, Boon v. Cliiles. 
 6 17 H. 137, Shields v. Barrow. 
 
 a .5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 h 14 H. 372, Peale u. Plilpps. 
 c IS H. 100, Macl<ey v. Coxe. 
 
 a 20 H. 87, Withers v. Buckley. 
 6 20 H. 297, Jackson v. Magnolia, 
 c 15 Wall. 520, Holvoke v Lvman 
 dl02 U. S. 544, Lord v. Steain. Co. 
 
 a 18 H. 241, U. S. v. Minn. R. R. Co. 
 
 VESGEAlfCE, LA. See U. S. 
 
 VE^^eE, the, a VTau. 273. 
 
 The civil war ; effect of occupa- 
 tion by the U. S. forces of New 
 Orleans, on rights of property and 
 intercourse, a 
 
 Persons residing within Confed- 
 erate States, enemies. 6 
 
 President's proclamation of 2d 
 April. 1863. c 
 
 Eight to sue suspended, d 
 
 VENTRESS V. SanTH, 10 P. 161. 
 
 Powers coupled with a trust, a 
 Error ; Intendments in favor of 
 judgment, b 
 
 VENUS, THE, 8 Cr. 353. 
 
 Prize ; neutral goods ; domicil of 
 owner, a 
 Conflscsition. 6 
 
 I a 92 U. S. 104, Neblett v. MaoFar- 
 ) land. 
 
 536. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 127, Collector v. Day. 
 a 12 Wall. 543, Legal Tender Cases 
 h 23 Wall. 348, Scholey v. Eew. 
 a 101 U. S. 5, JSTat. Bank v. U. S. 
 6102U. S. 599, Springer v. U. S. 
 La "Vengeance. 
 
 a 2 Wall. 479, The Baigorry. 
 a 3 Wall. 632, The Reform, 
 ft 5 Wall. 60, The Pcterhott". 
 c 6 Wall. 531, Ouachita Cotton. 
 a 9 Wall. 131, The Grapeshot. 
 a 9 Wall. 541, U. S. v. Padelford. 
 d\^ Wall. 253, Levy v. Stewart. 
 a 12 Wall. 134, Mail Co. u Flanders. 
 a 16 Wall. 495, Pl.an.Bk.c.Un.Bk. 
 a 21 Wall. 94, Hamilton v. Dillon. 
 aOUU. S. 496, Clark i>. U. S. 
 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 b 7 II. 714, Townsend v. Jemison. 
 
 a 8 Cr. 371, The Fi-ances. 
 a n H. 60, U. S. u. Gnillem, 
 a 5 Wall. 408, The Wm. BugalfV. 
 & 11 Wall. 306, Miller v. U. S. 
 
332 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 VERDEX V. COLEMAN, 1 Bl. 478. 
 
 Supieine Court ; writ of error | a 91 U. 8. 114, Long v. Converse, 
 to, State court ; Federal question, a \ 
 
 VEKMTLTE T. EXPRESS COMPANY, Zl WaH. 138. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 396, Cooke v. U. S. 
 See White v. Termont R. R. 
 
 U. S. notes; commercial paper, a 
 
 VERMONT BAZLROAS, WHITE v. 
 VEBT V. liEVY, 13 H. 361. 
 
 Equity ; bill ; must be framed 
 for the relief granted, a 
 
 Deeds ; presumptions in favor of 
 validity. 6 
 VICK, IiANE V. See Lane v. Tick. 
 
 VICKSBUBG, MARSHALL v. See Marsliall v. Vioksbnrg, 
 VICTORY, THE, 6 WaU. 388. 
 
 Decision ; wliat constitutes, a 
 
 VIDAL V. GIRARD, 8 H. 187. 
 
 Corporations; may bo trustees, a 
 Charitable devises ; 43 Eliz. 6 
 
 a 19 H. 12G, Baker e. Naclitrieb. 
 a 23 H. 472, Very v. Watkins. 
 6 92 U. S. 425, Clements u. Mache- 
 boiif. 
 
 I a 8 Wall . 138, Woodruff j>. Parham 
 
 VELLABOLOS V. V. S., 6 H. 81. 
 
 Supreme Court ; docketiufj; and 
 return of appeals and writs of 
 error, a 
 
 Service of citation. 6 
 
 a G H. 318, Plant. Bank v. Sharp. 
 ft 9 H. 76, Wheeler ». Smitli. 
 6 17 H. 382, Fontain v. Eavenel. 
 ft 24 H. 501, Perin v. Cary. 
 a 7 Wall. 14, Gii-ard v. Phila. 
 6 95 U. S. 309, Onld»Wash.Hosp. 
 ft 101 U. S. 366, Kain ». Gibboiiy. 
 
 VINCENNES UNIVERSITY, V. 
 
 a 19 H. 182, The Virpnia v. West. 
 a 3 Wall. 50, Ciistro v. U. S. 
 a 6 Wall. 358, Mussina v Cavazos. 
 a 6 Wall. 451, Kail v. Wetmore. 
 a 6 Wall. 496, Washington uDen- 
 
 nison. 
 a 7 Wall. 309, Edmonson v. 
 
 Bloomsliire. 
 a 20 Wall. 624, Mnrdocku Memphis 
 6 94 U. S. 112, Dayton v. Lash. ' 
 
 INDIANA, 14 H. 873. 
 
 Power of Territoi-iiil Legislature 
 to incorporate the University, a 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; charters of corporations. 6 
 
 Grants to cliaritable uses, c 
 
 VIOLETT V. PATTON, S Cr. 150. 
 
 Contracts ; consideration, u, 
 
 Negotiable paper; due diligence; 
 notice. 6. 
 
 Acconjmodation paper 
 in blank, c 
 
 Assumpsit, d 
 
 a 3 Wall. 062, EogersrBurlingt'ii 
 ft 13 Wall. 214, Penn. Coll. Cases, 
 c 95 U. S. 313, Quid K Wash. Hosp. 
 
 signing 
 
 VTOLETT V. STETTINIUS. 
 VIRGIN, THE, 8 P. 648. 
 
 Bottomry bonds, a 
 Hypothecation of vessel by mas- 
 ter in foreign port. 6 
 
 a 15 P. 311, U. S. w. Linn. 
 6 3 H. 529, Camden v. Doremus. 
 c 20 H. 356, Goodman v. Simonds. 
 a 22 I-I. 43, Emerson v. Slater, 
 c 22 H. 108. Bank of Pitts, v. Neal 
 c 9 Wall. 552, Bank v. Eldred. 
 d 22 Wall. 507, Piatt «. U.S. 
 c 92 U. S. 338, Angle v. Ins. Co. 
 
 See Violett i;. Patton, 
 
 o 18 H. 05, Carrington v. Pratt, 
 ft 19 H. 25, Tliomas v. Osborn. 
 a 9 Wall. 140, The Grapeshot. 
 ft 10 Wall. 202, The Lulu. 
 a 96 U. S. 655, Ins. Co. K.Gosszler 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 333 
 
 VIRGINIA, CHESAPEAKE RAILROAD v. See Chesapeake B. E. ■o, Virginia, 
 
 VIRGINIA, COHENS v. See Cohens v. Virginia. 
 
 VIRGINIA, GRAYSON v. See Grayson v. Virginia. 
 
 VIRGINIA, HOM-INGSWORTH -v. See Hollingsworth v. Virginia. 
 
 VIRGINIA, PHAIEN v. See Phalen v. Virginia. 
 
 VIRGINIA, PAUIi V. See Paul v. Virginia. 
 
 VIRGINIA, THE, v. "WEST, 19 H. 182. 
 
 Supreme Court ; return of writs 
 of error and appeals, and filing rec- 
 ord, a 
 
 a 3 Wall. 50, Ca.5ti'o v. U. S. 
 a 3 Wall. 763, U. S. v. Gomez. 
 a 7 Wall. 310, Edmonson v. 
 
 Bloom.«liire. 
 a 09 U. S. 506, Grlgsby v. Purcell, 
 
 VIRGINIA EHKMAN, THE, 97 V. S. 309. 
 
 Collision; liability of vessels to I a 97 U. S. 329, The City of Hartford 
 third parties, a \ 
 
 VOORHEES V. BANK OF THE V. S. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 
 10 p. 473. 
 
 a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass, 
 
 a 16 P. 81, Cocke v. Halsey. 
 
 a 2 H. 53, Shriver v. Linn. 
 
 a 2 H. 335, Griojnon v. Astor. 
 
 a 6 H. 36, Bank IT. S. v. Moss. 
 
 a 8 H. 409, West v. Smith. 
 
 a 12 H. 378, Sargeant v. State Bk. 
 
 a 14 H. 587, Hutt'u. Hutchhison. 
 
 a 24 H. 203, Kations v. Johnson. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 634, Gray «; Brignardello 
 
 a 2 Wall. 342, Harvey v. Tyler. 
 
 a 5 Wall. 304, Christmas u Russell 
 
 a 10 Wall. 316, Cooper v Reynolds 
 
 a 16 Wall. 366, McNitt v. Turner. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 467, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 659, Lamp v. Brass Co. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 165, Tilton v. Cofield. 
 
 al02U. S. 464, Hall v. Law. 
 VOOBHEES V. BONESTEEIi, 16 WaU. 16. 
 
 Married women ; separate prop- I a 101 U. 
 nty. a I 
 
 VOOBHIES, McKIM v. See McKim v. Voorhles, 
 VOSE, HARRISON v. See Harrison v. Vose. 
 VOSE, TDI.ee v. See Tnlee v. Vose. 
 VOWEtl., IT. S. v. See U. S. v. Vowell. 
 WADDLE, WATTS v. See Watts v. Waddle. 
 WADE V. I.EROT, 80 H. 34. 
 
 Common carriers ; liability for | a 2 Bl. 592, Nebraska v. Campbell, 
 injuries ; damages, a I 
 
 WADLEIGH, VBAZIE v. See Veazie v. Wadleigh. 
 WAGER V. HAIX, 16 WaU. 487. 
 
 Bankruptcy; fraudulent prefer- I a 21 Wall. 427, Michaels v. Post, 
 ences. a I a 95 U. S. 346, Nat. Bank J). Cook. 
 
 WAGGENER, BANK OF U. S. v. See Banlc ot U. S. v. Waggener. 
 WAGNON, W^OOD V, See Wood v, Wagnon, 
 
 399, Aldridge v. Muir- 
 head. 
 
.334 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 WAKEFIEID, BBEWSTEB v. See Brewster v. Wakefleld. 
 ■WALBBtTN V. BABBITT, 16 Wall. 677. 
 
 Verdict ; court can direct, a 
 
 TFALDEN v. BODLEY, 14 P. 156. 
 
 Amendments, a 
 Equity; genei'al relief, b 
 Jndgments; when they can be 
 pleaded in bar. c 
 
 WALDEN V. CRAIG, 9 Wh. 676. 
 
 Writ of error coram nobis; 
 amendments, a 
 
 a 93 U. S. 147, Hendrick v Lindsay 
 
 a 12 H. 422, Snead v. M'CoiiU. 
 6 17 H. 455, Stevens v. Gladding, 
 c 4 Wall. 237, Hughes v. U. S. 
 c 7 Wall. 109, Durante. Essex Co. 
 
 a 7 P. 144. Pickett v. Legerwood. 
 a 14 P. 151. Walden v. Craig. 
 n en. 36, Bank U. S. v. Moss. 
 o 9 H. 36, Walden v. Bodley. 
 a 16 H. 576, Slicer v. Bank Pittsb'g 
 
 a 4 Wh. 220, Barr o, Gratz. 
 
 6 99 U. S. 168, Harris ». :Mc(Joveru. 
 
 WARDEN T. GRATZ, 1 Wh. 295. 
 
 Adverse possession, a 
 Statute of limitations ; subse- 
 quent disabilities. 6 
 
 ■rt'AI-KER V. BAI*K OE WASHINGTON, 3 H. 68. 
 
 Usury, a | a 97 U. S. 24, Hotel Co. v. Wade, 
 
 WAIKEB V. DBEVILLE, 18 Wall. 440. 
 
 Supreme Court ; appeal proper in I a 17 Wall. 18, Marin v. Lally. 
 equity case, a I 
 
 WAXEER, HAGAN v. See Hagan v. Walker. 
 
 WAtKER, liAWXER v. See Lawler v. Walker. 
 
 WALKER, McIVBR v. See Mclver v. Walker. 
 
 WAIKER, PUBLIC SCHOOLS v. See Public Schools v. Walker. 
 
 WALKER, REESIDE -r. See Eeeside r. Walker. 
 
 WALKER -v. BOBBINS, 14 H. 484. 
 
 Equity ; when it will enjoin judg- 
 ments at law. a 
 Laches. 6 
 
 a 17 H. 445, Hendr'kson o.Hinkley 
 a 94 U. S. 658, Crim v. Handley. 
 b 95 U. S. 161, Brown v. Buena 
 Vista. 
 
 WALKER V. SAUVENET, 98 V. S. 90. 
 
 Supreme Court; objections must I a 97 U. S. 583, Newcorab v. Wood, 
 first be taken in the court below, a \ 
 
 WALKER V. STATE HARBOR COMMISSIONERS, 17 Wall. 648. 
 
 IT. S. courts ; obligatory force of I o 100 U. S. 52, Fairfield v. Gallatin 
 State decisions, a \ 
 
 WALKER V, TAYLOR, 5 H. 64. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to I a o H. 374, Scott t>. Jones. 
 State court ; Federal question, a | 
 
 WALKER V. TRANSPORTATION CO., 3 Wall. 150. 
 
 Common carriers ; negligence, a | 
 
 WALKER V. TURNER, 9 Wh. 640. 
 
 Supreme Court ; venire do novo, | 
 with leave to amend, a | 
 
 WALKER v. U. S. 4 WaU. 164. 
 
 Supreme Court ; amount in con- 
 troversy, a 
 
 a 17 Wall. 375, E. R. Co. v. Lock- 
 wood. 
 
 a 4 IT. 143, Gai'land v. Davis. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 366, Tlie D. R. Martin. 
 a 93 U. S. 567, Tel. Co. v. Rogers, 
 a 95 U. S. 695, Tlionipson v. Butler 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DEOISIOKS. 
 
 335 
 
 WAI-KEB, V. S. V. See U. S. v. "Wallcer. 
 WAIKEK V. WHITEHEAD, 16 Wall. 314. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- la 96 U. S. 73, Tenn. v. Sneed. 
 tracts ; iudgrnents. a | a 101 U. S. 438, S. Car. v. Gaillard. 
 
 WAIiKLET V. MUSCATINE, 6 Wall. 481. 
 
 U. S. courts; mandamus to com- I a 19 Wall. 657, Heine v. Com'rs. 
 pel levy of a tax to pay judgment 
 on municipal bonds, a \ 
 
 WAIil., AKDKEWS V. See Andrews v. Wall. 
 WAIiL, WILSON V. See Wilsoii v. Wall. 
 WALLACE V. ANDERSON, 5 Wh. 898. 
 
 Quo warranto ; can only issue at I a 3 Wall. 238, Territory v. Lock- 
 
 instance of government, a 
 
 WALLACE, KNOX CO. v. See Knox Go. v. Wallace. 
 
 WALLACE V. McCONNELL, 13 P. 136 
 
 Negotiable paper; demand at 
 banlv. o 
 Attachment. 6 
 
 WALLACH V. KAN KISWICK, 93 U. S. 307 
 
 wood. 
 
 a 9 H. 276. Brabston v. Gribson. 
 6 20 H. 130,' Mattingly v. Boyd. 
 a 100 U. S. 714, Cox v. Nat. Bank. 
 
 Confiscation, a 
 
 WALLEN V. WILLXAMS, 7 Cr. 378. 
 
 Supersedeas, a 
 
 \a 94 U. S. 712, Pike v. Wassell. 
 1 a 102 U . S. 133, French v. Wade. 
 
 a 18 H. 146, Adams v. Law. 
 
 a 10 Wall. 292, Slaughter - House 
 Cases. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 100, French v. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 
 WALLEK V. BEST, 3 H. 111. 
 
 Liens of judgments. «. 
 WALLER, BIGLEK v. See Bigler v. Waller. 
 WALLINGFOKD v. ALLEN, 10 P. 583. 
 
 District of Columbia ; force of I a 5 H. 78, Miller v. Herbert, 
 decisions of Maryland courts, a | 
 
 WALSH V. ROGERS, 13 H. 383. 
 
 Admiialty jurisdiction, a 
 Supreme Court will not reverse in 
 collision suit unless in clear case. 6 
 
 WALTON V. COTTON, 19 H. 357. 
 
 Pensions, a 
 WALTON, COtJLSON v. See Conlson v. Walton. 
 WALTON V. V. S., 9 Wi. 651. 
 
 Bills of exceptions, a 
 Public officers ; settlement of ac- 
 counts, b 
 
 I a 7 H. 618, Peck v. Jenness. 
 
 a 20 H. 297. Jackson v. Magnolia. 
 6 7 Wall. 204, The Grace Girdler. 
 b 93 U. S. 339, The Juniata. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 357, U. S. v. Hail. 
 
 WANATA, THE, 95 U. S. 611. 
 
 Admiralty ; stipulations, a 
 
 a 4 H. 12, Brown v. Claik. 
 a 6 n. 274, Sheppard v. Wilson. 
 a 16 H. 21, Turner v. Yale's. 
 6 9 Wall. 762, Watkins v. U. S. 
 a 91 U. S. 2.51, MuUer v. Eliler.s. 
 a 102 U. S. 120, R. E. Co. d. Hock. 
 a 102 U. S. 357, HiiiinicuLt v. Pey- 
 ton. 
 
 a99U. S. 30, U.S. U.Ames. 
 
336 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 WANZEB, TKTJIiY v. See Truly i;. Wanzer. 
 WANZEK T. TKTILY, 17 H. 684. 
 
 Attachments ; defenses, a I a 18 H. 219, "McLanghlin v. Swann. 
 
 Sales; piircliase-nioney. 6 | & 19 H. 350, McCuUoiigh v. Boots. 
 
 WAPLES, CONRAD v. See Oonrad v. Waples. 
 WARD V. CHAMSEBLAIN, 8 Bl. 438. 
 
 U. S. courts; process; lien of 
 jndgments. a 
 
 Equity ; cloud on title, b 
 TTAKD, CHAMBEBIiAIN v. See Chamberlain v. Ward. 
 WARD T. MABYLANIJ, 18 Wall. 430. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 217, Brown v. Pierce. 
 6 101 U. S. 37i5, Phelps v. Harris. 
 
 Constitution ; privileges and im- 
 mnnities. a 
 
 Discrimination. 6 
 
 Kegiilation of commerce ; trans- 
 portation, c 
 
 WARD V. SMITH, 7 WaU. 451. 
 
 Payments in Confederate mon- 
 ey, a 
 
 "Payments to agents in enemy's 
 country. 6 
 
 WARD V. V. S., 14 Wall. S99. 
 
 Instructions, a 
 WARDELIi, MUMFOBD T. See Mumford v. Wardell. 
 WARDEN, GIBSON v. See Gibson u. Warden. 
 WARE, BRUSH v.. See Brush v. Ware. 
 WARE V. HYLTON, 3 DaU. 199. 
 
 a 16 "Wall. 76, Slanghter-House 
 
 6 16 Wall. 482, Osborne'??. Mobile, 
 c 95 U. S. 470, E. E. Co. v. Husen 
 a 96 U. S. 183, William.s v. Bruffy 
 c 100 U. S. 439, Guy v. Baltimore. 
 6 100 U. S. 678, Mach. Co. v. Gage. 
 
 a 22 Wall. 208, Pretz v. Stover. 
 b 95 U. S. 432, Ins. Co. v. Davis. 
 a 99 U. S. 571, McBurney b Carson 
 
 a 93 U. S..299, Indianapolis cHorst 
 
 War; confiscation of debts; right 
 of creditor to sue suspended, a 
 
 Treaty-making power. 6 
 WARE, PEISCH V. See Peisch v. Ware. 
 WARING T. CLARKE, 6 H. 451. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction; maritime 
 contracts, a 
 
 Ebb and flow of tide, b 
 
 Collision; when each party bears 
 his own loss, c 
 
 Torts on navigable water within 
 the body of a county, d 
 
 Inevitable accident, e 
 
 Collisions; lights. / 
 
 a 6 Wall. 537. Hanger v. Abbott. 
 6 100 U. S. 489, Hauensteiu v Lyn- 
 ham. 
 
 WARING V. MAYOR, 8 WaU. 119. 
 
 Eevenue; importations; permits 
 for landing, a 
 Constitution ; tax on imports. 6 
 
 a en. 378, liTew Jersey St. Nav. 
 
 Co. V. Mcr. Bank. 
 & 12 H. 450, Gen. Chief u. Pitzlmgh 
 c 14 H. 534, Steinback v. Eae. 
 d 20 H. 297, Jackson v. Magnolia. 
 d 23 H. 215, Phil.W. & B. K.E. Co. 
 
 «. Phil.&H.S.T.Co. 
 d 1 B1.580, Propeller Commerce. 
 6 4 Wall. 563, The Hine & Trevor 
 e 7 Wall. 203, The Grace Girdler. 
 a 7 Wall. 636, The Belfast. 
 d 8 Wall. 26, The Eagle. 
 6 11 Wall. 25, Ins. Co. v. Dunham 
 a 18 Wall. 304, Atkins v. Di.'iinte- 
 
 grating Co. 
 /92U. S. 36, Cityof Wasliingtoii 
 
 a 10 Wall. 449, Kimball v. Coll'r. 
 b 15 Wall. 295, St. Tax E. Rec'pts 
 ft 97 U. S. 573, Cook«. Plmim. 
 6 100 U. 8. G77, Mach. Co. v. GaRi' 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.- 337 
 
 WABNEK V. NORTON, SO H. 448. 
 
 5few trial; discretionary, a | a 95 U. S. 288, Cambuston v. U. S. 
 
 WAKKEN, KEENE t. See Keene v. Warren. 
 
 WAKBEN, I,EFFINGWEi:.]:i v. See Lefflngwell v. Warren. 
 
 WABBEN V. VAN BBCNT, 19 "WaU. 646. 
 
 Land Office; wlien jurisdiction I a 101 U. S. 519, Vance v. Burbank. 
 exclusive ; pre-emption, a I 
 
 WABBEN BBIDGE, CHARI.ES BIVEB BBIDGB v. See Charles Eiver 
 
 Bridge v. Warren Bridge. 
 WABBEN CO. V. MAKCT, 97 U. S. 96. 
 
 Negotiable paper; lis pendens, a I a 99 U. S. 683, Orleans v. Piatt. 
 
 1 a 100 U. S. 593, Cass Co. v. Gillett. 
 WABBEN INS. CO., PETEBS t. See Peters v. Warren Ins. Co. 
 WABTON, HUNTER v. See Hunter i). Warton. 
 WASHBUBN, DAY v. See Day ii. Wasliburn. 
 WASHINGTON, CI.AEK v. See Olark v. Washington. 
 WASHINGTON, DANDBIDGE v. See Dandridge v. Washington. 
 WASHINGTON T. DBNNISON, 6 WaU. 496. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error; | a 94U. S. 112, Dayton v. Lash, 
 citation, a I 
 
 WASHINGTON V. PEATT, 8 Wi. 687. 
 
 Tax sales, a | a 9 H. 256, Mason v. Fearson. 
 
 WASHINGTON, SHANKLAND v. See Shankland v. Washington. 
 WASHINGTON, SMITH v. See Smith r. Washington/ 
 WASHINGTON, W^EIGHTMAN v. See Weightman v. Washington. 
 WASHINGTON, A. & G. PACKET CO., BBABIEY v. See Bradley v. Wash- 
 ington, A. & G-. Packet Co. 
 WASHINGTON BBIDGE CO. v. STEWABT, 3 H. 413 
 
 Judgments; setting aside after 
 expiration of terra, a 
 Supreme Court ; rehearing. 6 
 Mandate, c 
 
 6 H. 36, U. S. Bank v. Moss. 
 6 18 H. 42, Peck v. Sanderson. 
 6 20 H. .542, Whytc «. Gibbcs. 
 h 12 Wall. 129, Noonanji. Bradley 
 a 17 Wall. 288, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 a 22 Wall. 246, French v. Hay. 
 c 102 U. S. 255, Williams D. Bruffy 
 
 WASHINGTON STEAM PACKET CO. v. SICKLES, 84 H. 333 
 
 Assumpsit ; parol evidence, a 
 Res judicata; estoppels; judg- 
 ments. 6 
 
 a 2 Wall. 42, Miles v. Caldwell. 
 6 5 Wall. 590, Pack. Co. ». Sickles. 
 6 7 Wall. 102, Aurora v. West. 
 6 94 U. S. 355, Cromwell ». Sac Co. 
 6 94 U. S. 608, Bussell ». Place. 
 6 99 U. S. 263, Campbell uKankin 
 WASHINGTON UNIVEBSITT v. BOUSE, 8 Wall. 439. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- I a 21 Wall. 498. Erie R. R. v. Penn. 
 tracts; exemptions from taxation, a I 
 
 WASHINGTON AND GREGORY, THE, 9 Wall. 519. 
 
 Collision ; damage done to third a 92 U. S. 698, The Alabama. 
 
 party ; form of decree against ships ; 
 moiety rule, a 
 
 o 93 U.S. 318, The Atlas. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 317, Virginia Ehrman. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 329, City of Hartford. 
 
 WASSEI.I., PIKE V. See Pike v. Wassell. 
 22 
 
338 
 
 MANUAL OF fiUPREME COUET DECISIONS. 
 
 ■WATEKSON, SOHN v. See Sohn v. 'Wateraon. 
 WATEKTOWN", KEES v. See Eees v, Watertown. 
 WATER WITCH, THE, 1 Bl. 494. 
 
 Collifioii ; Supreme Court will J a 7 Wall. 204, The Grace Girdler. 
 only i-everse in clear case, a | a 93 U. S. 339, The Juniata. 
 
 WATER AJSB MTNING CO. v. BtlGBBT, 96 C. S. 165. 
 
 Mineral lands ; pre-emption, a I a 102 U. S. 175, Mining Co. v. Con. 
 
 I Milling Co. 
 
 WATHEN, BOWMAN V. See Bowman «. Wathen. 
 
 WATKINS, EX PARTE, 3 P. 803, 
 
 Constitution; judicial power. 
 Supremo Court; jurisdietnon. 
 Hal)eas corpus, c 
 Jurisdiction in criminal cases. 
 
 WATKTNS, GREEX v, 
 WATKENS V. HOiLMAN, 16 P. 85. 
 
 Equity ; when it will act on real 
 estate iu foreign country, a 
 Evidence; copy of deed. 6 
 Bona-fide purchassers. c 
 Vendor arid vendee ; estoppel, d 
 
 a a 12 P. 714, Rhode Island v. Mass. 
 6 6 2H..335, Grignono. Astor. 
 
 c .5 H. 188, ex parte Metzger. 
 d d 9 H. .'572, Forsyth v. U. S. 
 
 6 2 Wall. 342, Harvey v. Tyler. 
 
 c IS Wall. 166, ex parte Lange. 
 
 c 93 U. S. 23, ex parte Parks. 
 
 c 100 U. S. 23, ea; ^arfe Reed. 
 
 c 100 U. S. 375, ex parte Siebold. 
 See G-reen v. Watkins. 
 
 a 15 H. 240, Ind.R. R. Co. v. Mich. 
 R. K. Co. 
 
 6 24 H. 179, Gregg v, Foi'syth. 
 
 c 5 Wall. 287, Croxall v. Sherei-d. 
 
 d 9 Wall. 293, Burnett ». Caldwell 
 
 d 9 W,all. 600, Merryman v Bonme 
 
 a 10 Wall. 475, Corbett v. Nutt. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 723, Pennoyer ». Neff. 
 WATKINS, WILMSON v. See Willison v. Watkins. 
 WATSON, BARNEY v. See Barney v. Watson. 
 WATSON T. BONDURANT, 81 Wall. 183. 
 
 Louisiana ; sales ; seizure, a ;| a 94 U. S. 10, Pilce v. Evans. 
 
 WATSON V. JONES, 13 W^aU. 679. 
 
 U.S. courts; cannot enjoin State 
 court, a 
 
 Conflict of jurlsdieHon. 6 
 WATSON, I.EE T. See Iiee IB. Watson. 
 WATSON V. MEBCEB, 8 P. IIO. 
 
 ■Constitution; obligatiom of con- 
 tracts ; retrospedive Icms. a 
 Ex post Jaeto laws. 6 
 
 a 96 U. S. 341, Dial v. Reynolds. 
 6 102 U. S. 262, Bank v. Calhoun. 
 
 ■a XI P. 540, Clrarles Rw. Bridge v. 
 
 Warren Bridge, 
 a 6 H. 331, Plant. Bank v. Sharp. 
 a 10 H. 396, Railroad Co. ». Nesbit. 
 6 17 H. 461, Carpenter v. Pcini. 
 ffl 24 H. 296, Bisseli u. JeffiersouviUe 
 a 7 Wall. 624, Beloit«. Morgau. 
 a 8 Wall. «Qa, Drehman v. Stifle, 
 ffl 16 Wall. 663, St. Joseph v Rogers 
 a 23 WaU. 147, Randell v. Kreiger. 
 
 WATSON T. Sl7THKKi:.ANB, B Wall. 7«. 
 
 Equity; jurisdiction, a 
 
 a 7 Wall. 430, Payne v. Hook. 
 a 99 U. S. 378, Van Norden v Mov- 
 tou. 
 
MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 830 
 
 ■WATSON V. TARPtEY, 18 H. 380. 
 
 U, S. eonrts ; obligatory iorce I a 18 Wall. 548, Boyce en. Tabb. 
 of State decisions, a \ a 100 U.. S. 246, Oates e. Bank. 
 
 ■WATSON V. TATLOK, 81 Wall. 378. 
 
 Bankruptcy; fraudulent prefer- I aVU U. S. 121, Sawyer ». Tmrpin. 
 ences, a 1 
 
 ■WATTUES, MdTTEK v. See Mclver v. "Wattles, 
 
 TFATTS V. MNBSKY, 7 Wli. 161. 
 
 Ej(!ctment. a I a 94 U. S. 775, Hogan v. Kurtz. 
 
 ■WATTS, MASSIB v. See Massie v. "Watts. 
 
 WATTS, MUT. ASS. SOCrETT v. See Mut. Ass. Society v. "Watts. 
 ■WATTS, VAN KENSEIKAR v. See "Van Eenselear v. Watts. 
 "WATTS T. WADDtE, 6 P. 389. 
 
 Equity, general relief, a I a 17 H. 4.55, Stevens c. Gladding. 
 
 JExtraterritorial inrisdietion. 6 6 22 Wall. 253. French v. Haj'. 
 Eeal property ; lex loci sitas. c j c 96 U. S. 635, Brine a. Ins. Co. 
 
 WAT, PEIHAM V. See Prfliam v. ■Way. 
 WAYMAN V. SOUTHARD, 10 W\l. 1. 
 
 . U. S. courts ; process, a 
 Power of Congi-ess to make laws 
 
 to carry into execution judgmeitts 
 
 of Federal courts. 6 
 
 Certificates of division, c 
 When the laws of the several 
 
 States are rules of decision, d 
 Legislatures; power to delegate 
 
 authority, e 
 
 a 10 Wh. 51, Bank v. Halstead. 
 a 6 P. 654, Boyle v. Zaoharie. 
 a 9 P. 355, Beers v. Haughton. 
 a 13 P. 57, Ross v. Duval. 
 a 14 P. 312, U. S. V. Knight. 
 a 1 H. 304, Duncan v. Davst. 
 a 2 H. 611, McCracken v Haywanl 
 a 16 H. 363. Homei- v. Brown. 
 
 5 24 H. 384, Kuox Com. Aspinwall, 
 c 2B1.435, Ward v. Cliiunberlaiu. 
 d 2B1.036, Wright b. Bales, 
 
 6 6 Wall. 187, Eiggs u. Joliusou. 
 d 6 Wall. 490, XT. S. v. Eekford. 
 e 10 Wall. 50, People's R. R. Co. 
 
 0. Mem. R. R. 
 h 94 U. S. 350, ex parte Flippin. 
 
 ■WEAR, DANTORTH v, See Danfortli v. Wear. 
 "WEATHERHEAB v. BASKERTIttE, 11 H. 356. 
 
 Wills ; parol evidence, a j a 18 H. 390, Allen v. Allen. 
 
 "WEA^VER, PEOPLE v. See People v. Weaver. 
 WEBB, THE, 14 WaU. 60S. 
 
 Admiralty ; liability of stipula- I a 95 U. S. 605, The Wanata. 
 toit. a U 99 U.S. 36, U. S. ». Am«s. 
 
 WEBB, lEITENSDOBPEB v. See Leitensdorfer v. Webb. 
 WEBB, McMICKBN v. See McMioken v. Webb. 
 WEBB, NICHOLS v. See NiehoUs D. Webb. 
 WEBB V. SHARP, 13 WaU. IS. 
 
 T indlord's lien a I a 15 Wall. 336, Fowler u. Rapley. 
 
 Landloia s l.en. a | „ 94 U. S. 383, Beall v. White. 
 
 WEBER V. HARBOR COMMISSIONERS, 18 WaU. 66. 
 
 States ; right to the bed of tide I « 94 U. S. 394, McCready v. Va. 
 Waters, a I 
 
340 
 
 MANUAL OP SUPREME COURT DECISION'S. 
 
 WEBER T. I/EE CO., 6 Wall. aiO. 
 
 U. S. courts ; mandamus to com- 
 pel levy of tax to pay judgment ou 
 municipal bonds, a 
 
 WEBSTER T. COOPER, lO H. 64. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 
 WEBSTER T. COOPER, 14 H. 604. 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatory force 
 
 of State decisions, a 
 Trustees ; chattel interest. & 
 Conditions subsequent; suit for 
 
 breach of. c 
 
 WEBSTER, INS. CO. v. See Ins. Oo. v. Webster. 
 WEBSTER V. REID, 11 H. 460. 
 
 Jurisdiction; judgments; notice 
 by publication, a , 
 
 Supreme Court; review of judg- 
 ment of Supreme Court of Terri- 
 tory after admission as a State. 6 
 
 Faith and credit to be given to 
 judgments, c 
 
 Direction of writ of error to State 
 court, d 
 
 a 9 Wall. 417, Sup'v'rs ». Durant. 
 
 a 18 H. 566, Dennistownw. Stewart 
 a 3 Wall. 255, Daniels». R. R. Co. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 603, LefflngwellB. Warren. 
 6 6 Wall. 471, Doe v. Consedine. 
 c 16 Wall. 230, Davis ». Gray, 
 c 97 U. S. 696, Rush v. Rock Isl'd. 
 
 WEBSTER V. UPTON, 91 r. S. 65. 
 
 Corporation ; liability of stock- 
 holder for unpaid subscription, a 
 
 a 24 H. 203, Nations ». Johnson. 
 
 b 2 Wall. 173, Freeborn v. Smith. 
 
 c 5 Wall. 302, Christmas v Russell 
 
 c 18 Wall. 464, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 428, Michaels v. Post. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 136, Ray w Norseworthy 
 
 d 91 U. S. 147, Atherton v. Fowler 
 
 a 91 U. S. 661, Lamp v. Bra^s Co. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 728, Pennoyer v. Neff. 
 
 a 99 U. S. 488, Montgomery v. 
 Samory. 
 
 a 95 U. S. 667, Chubb v. Upton. 
 
 a 96 U. S. .330, Pullmans. Upton. 
 
 a 102 U. S. 316, Hawley v. Upton. 
 
 WEED, U. S. T. See U. S. v. Weed, 
 WEEMS V. GEORGE, 13 H. 190. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error; ) a 1 Wall. 103, Burr j). Des Moines 
 agreed case ; statement of facts, a \ 
 
 WEIDB, INS. CO. v. See Ins. Co. ■o. Weide. 
 
 WEIGHTMAIf V. WASHINGTON, 1 Bl. 39. 
 
 Municipal corporations ; liability 
 for injuries for want of repair of 
 streets, a 
 
 WEISIGER, BANK OP THE V. S. ■« 
 
 WELCH, LOUISVILLE MAN. CO. \ 
 
 WELCH, MAJSTDEVILLE v. See Mandeville v Walch. 
 
 WELLS, EX PARTE, 18 H. 308. 
 
 Supreme Court; habeas corpus, a 
 Criminal law; accomplices; 
 State's evidence ; pardon. 6 
 
 a 2 Bl. 592, Nebraska » Campbell. 
 a 16 Wall. 574, Water Co. v. Ware. 
 a 91 U. S. 551, Barnes v. Dis. of C. 
 
 See Bank of the U. S. o. Weiseger. 
 
 See Louisville Man. Co. r. Welch. 
 
 WELLS, GILL y. See Gill i>. Wells. 
 WELLS v. SUPERVISORS, 103 U. S. 685. 
 
 a 8 Wall. 100, ex^arfeYerger. 
 a IS Wall. 166, exparte Lange. 
 a 93 U. S. 23, exparte Parks. 
 6 99 U. S. 601, Whiskey Cases. 
 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- 
 roads ; -'Missouri township aid 
 act." a 
 
 a 102 U. S. 639, Ogden v. Daviess. 
 
MANTTAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 341 
 
 WBXSH V. MANDETXLM:, 5 Cr. 
 
 Supreme Court -, citation, a 
 
 1 a 99 U; S. 609, Nat. Banlc v. Banlv. 
 
 ■WELSH, SAMPSON T. See Sampson v. -Welsli. 
 ■WEITON V. MISSOUBI, 91 V. S. 875. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- 
 merce, a 
 Exclusive power of Congress, b 
 
 WENDKIX, rOlK T. 
 
 WEST T. AtlBOKA CITY, 6 TTaU. 139. 
 
 a 93 U. S. 103, Sherlock v. Ailing. 
 a 95 U. S. 470, R. R. Co. v. Hnsen 
 a 100 U. S. 439, Guy ». Baltimore. 
 a 100 U. S. 678, Maeh. Co. u.Cage. 
 a 102 U. S. 125, Tiernan v. Rinker. 
 b 102 U. S. 702, Mobile v. Kimball. 
 
 See Polk v. 'Weiidell. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 580, Partridge v Ins. Co. 
 6 16 Wall. 195, Bank v. Turnball. 
 6 18 Wall. 575, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 
 U. S. courts; State laws as to 
 set-offs, a 
 
 RemoTalacts; what is a "suit;" 
 citizenship. 6 
 
 ■WEST, ATJKORA T. See Aurora v. West. 
 
 WEST V. BAKNES, 8 DaU. 401. 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error ; I a 6 Wall. 357, Mussina v. Cavazos. 
 issue of . a , I 
 
 WEST. BBASHEAK v. 
 
 See Brashear v. West. 
 
 WEST T. BBASHEAB, 14 P. 51. 
 
 Supreme Court; mandate, a 
 
 WEST V. COCHEAJf, W H. 403. 
 
 Missouri land titles; when title 
 attaches; survey, a 
 
 What titles Congress reserved to 
 itself the power to deal with, b 
 
 Courts have no authority to dis- 
 regard surveys and patents in ac- 
 tions of ejectment, c 
 
 1 a 11 Wall. 674, Cook v. Burnley. 
 
 a 18 H, 21, Kissell v. Pub. Schools 
 6 18 H. 197, Lafayette v. Kenton. 
 b 18 H. 411, Stanford v. Taylor. 
 C19H. 80, Willot «. Sandford. 
 a 19 H. 209, Cousin v. Blanc. 
 a 19 H. 834, BrJ^an v. Forsyth. 
 a 1 B1.189, Carondelet O.St. Louis 
 a 1 Bl. 199, Magwire v. Tyler. 
 b 8 Wall. 661, Maguirev. Tyler. 
 b 17 Wall. 280, Tyler v. Magwire. 
 c 98 U. S. 212, Snyder o. Sickles. 
 
 WEST, HOOVEE T. See Hoover v. West. 
 
 WEST, T. S. V. See U. S. i). West. 
 
 WEST, THE "VIEGINIA v. See Virginia, The, v. West. 
 
 WEST CHES. K. B» CO., STIMPSON v. See Stimpson u. West Ches. B. K. Co. 
 
 WEST BTVEB BKIBGE v. DIX, 6 H 
 
 Constitution ; charters ; obliga- 
 tion of contracts, a 
 
 Power of the States over land 
 held by U. S. Government, b 
 
 Ferries; bridges; legislative 
 power over, c 
 
 Eminent domain ; exercise of, 
 does not inteiiere with contracts, d 
 
 Early amendments to the Con- 
 stitution apply to the U. S. e 
 
 5S9. 
 
 a H. 529. Plant. Bank v. Sharp, 
 
 b 7 H. 190^ U. S. V. Chicago. 
 
 c 10 H. 532, E. Hartford u. Bridge. 
 
 d 13 H. 78, Richmond R. R. Co. v. 
 
 Louisa R. R. Co. 
 e 20 H. 87, Withers v. Buckley. 
 
342 
 
 MANTTAL OF SUPREME COVRT DECISTOKK 
 
 ■meSTON v. CHARLESTON, 8 P. 464, 
 
 Supreme, Court; Federal qnes- 
 tioii ; writ of error to State eotirt ; 
 final judgments, a 
 
 Constitution; tax by State on 
 agency of U. S. Government. 5 
 ' Supreme Court ; jurisdiction ; 
 amount in controversy means a 
 property value, c 
 
 What is a "■suit." 
 
 a 14 P. 561, Holmes v. Jennison. 
 6 IS P. 443, Dobbins v. Comm'rs. 
 c I Bl. 272, Pratt v. Fitzhugh. 
 6 2 Bl. 62S, Bank v.. New York. 
 d 4 Wall. 112, ex parte Millegan. 
 b 6 Wall. 47, Crandellw Nevada 
 6 6 Wall. 60o,. So. forSav. w.Coit 
 6 7 Wall. 23, Banks v. Mayor. 
 b 9 Wall. 589, Thompson J7.R.R. 
 6 n Wall. 123, Collector v. Day. 
 6 12 Wall. 224, St. Ton . Tax Cas. 
 d T8 Wall. 585, Sew. Ma. Co. Case 
 h 91 U. S. 34, Bank w. Dearing. 
 d 91 IT. S. 375, Kohl v. U. S. 
 a 93 TJ. S. 121, Home Ins. Co. v. 
 
 City. 
 6 99' U. S. 279, Tr. Co. » Wheeling 
 S 100 U. S. 542, People v. Weaver. 
 a 102 U. S. 4I8i Daniels. ».Teai-ney 
 
 WESTKAY V. U. S., 18 "WaU. 33». 
 
 Duties ; suit to recover back. a. f a 101 U. S. 179, Wright r.Blackslee 
 WEST VIKGINIA, STKAtTDEK v. See Strauderi). "West Virginia. 
 WEST. Wise. B. R. V. SinPBBVTSOBS, »S IT. S. 59S. 
 
 a 95 XJ. S.. 686, Farringtaii v. Tenn. 
 b 97 U. S. 66&, Fertilizing Co. v. 
 Hydie Park. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of eon- 
 tracts; exemption from taxatioa. a 
 
 Construction of exemption. 6 
 WETHCEKED, BISCHOFF v. See Bisolioff v. WetheredL 
 WETZELL T. BtrSSAKD, 11 "WTl. 309. 
 
 Statute of limitations ; acknowl- I o 1 P. 355, Bell v. Mon-iscMi. 
 edgments. a I a: 6 P. 90, Moore v. Bank of Cbl. 
 
 WEYAUWEGA v., AIXESG, 99 U. S^ Iia. 
 
 County and municipal bonds in I a 101 U. S., 699,. Anthony ». Jasper 
 aid of raih-oads ; recitals ; estop- Go. 
 
 pel ; bona-ffde pwi'chasers. a \ 
 
 WHAKTENBY, DANTEX v.. See Daniel v. Wliarteiity. 
 WHEATON v. PETEKS, S B. 65&. 
 
 U. S. courts; jurisdictiork in j a 13 H. 557, Penn. w. Wlieeliug 
 equity not affected by chancery r Bridge Co. 
 
 system of States, a • I 
 
 WHEATON V. SEXTON, 4 Wli. 506. 
 
 Jurisdiction, a l « W P. 469, Voorhees v. Bank U. S. 
 
 f 6 16 Wall. 365, McNitt v. Turner. 
 
 See Sexton v. "Wlieaton. 
 
 Judicial sales. 6 
 
 WHEATON, SEXTON v. 
 
 See Olifo and Miss. E. E. v: "Wbeeler. 
 
 TTHEEtER, OHIO AND MISS. K. R. 
 WHEELER V. SEDGWICK, 94 U. S. 1. 
 
 Supreme Court ; objections must I a 97 U. S. 583, Newcoinbtr. Wood.- 
 flrst be talsen in the court below, a j 
 
 WHEELER V. SMITH, 9 H. 56. 
 
 Charitable uses ; under laws of 
 Virginia; prerogative of the Crown; 
 wiiether vested in the U. S. a 
 
 Equity ; mistalces. 6 
 
 a 17 H. 382, Fontain u. Ravenel. 
 b 98 U. S. 92, Snell v. Ins. Co. 
 a 101 U. S. 367, Kain v. Gibboiiy. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 343 
 
 WHEEI-EB, TOMPKINS v. Soe Tompkins u. Wheeler.. 
 
 WHEELING BRIDGE CO., PENN. v. See Penn. v. Wheeling Bridge Go. 
 
 WHEKKITT, SHAWHAN v. See Shawhan v. Wherritt. 
 
 WHITE T. BUKNI-JEY, 80 H. 246. 
 
 Texas titles ; ptitents ; defects in I a 20 II. 265, Spenser v. Lapstey. 
 eatry and survey ; equity, a [all Wall. 667, Cook v. Buunley, 
 
 WHITE, CINCINNATI v. See Cincinnati v. White. 
 WHITE, GORHAM v. See Gorham v. White. 
 WHITE V. HAKT, 13 WaU. 647. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation ot con- 
 tracts ; notes for sale of slaves, a 
 Acts ill aid of the rebellion void. 6 
 Status of the Confederate States, c 
 
 a 13 Wall. 656, Osborne v. Kichol- 
 son. 
 
 a 14 Wall. 667,. Delmas v. Ins. Co. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 624, Gnnn v. Bairrv. 
 
 a T8 Wall. 548, Boyce v. Tabb. 
 
 6 22 Wall. 49&, Taylor ». Thomas. 
 
 c 97 U. S. 463, Keith v. Clark. 
 WHITE, TEXAS V. See Texas ■o.WTiite. 
 WHITE V. TURK, 12 P. 313. 
 
 Certificates of division, a a 
 
 5 H. 209, IT. S. V. Briargs. 
 a 6 H. 43, Nesuiith v. Sheldon. 
 a 7 H. 190, U. S. v. Chicago, 
 a 18 I-I. 566, Dennistowuy Stewart. 
 
 WHITE, U. S. V. See U. S. v. White. 
 
 WHITE v. VERMONT RAILROAD COMPANY. 
 
 Bailroad and municipal bonds; 
 negotiability, a 
 Coupons, b 
 
 21 H. 575. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 575, Mercer !7. Hackett. 
 a 1 Wall. 206, Gelpcke » Dubuque 
 6. 7 Wall. 1Q5, Aurora, v. West . 
 a ]4 Wall.-293, Lexington d Butler 
 7 Wall. 660. 
 
 ships; a 8 Wall. 496, Aldrichu. ^-Etna Co 
 a aid WaU. 476, Morgan M.Parhain. 
 
 a 21 Wall. 577, The Lotta wanna, 
 WHITELT, COMBHSSIONEB v. See Oomtnissioner v. Whltely. 
 WHITEHEAD, WALKER tt. See Wallter v. Whitehead. 
 WHITESIDE V. U. S., 93 tl. S. 847. 
 
 Ignoiance of th« law no excuse. a\ ok 96 U. S. 691, Hawkuis u. U.S. 
 
 WHITEWATER VALLEY CO. v. VALLETTE, 81 H. 485. 
 
 WHITE'S BANK v. SMITH, 
 
 Shipping; mortgage of 
 recording and enrollment. 
 
 Retrospective and cnrative laws.a 
 Corporations ; power to issue ne- 
 gotiable papei'. u 
 Powers generally, c 
 
 WHITING V. BANK IJ. S., 1» P. 15. 
 
 Supreme Court ; final decrees, a 
 Bills of. review. 6 
 
 a 1 Wall., 204, Gelpcke v Dnbuqae 
 6 7 Wall. 412, R. B. Co. v Howard 
 clOlU. S. 626, Jones. ». Guar. Co. 
 
 a 6 H. 202, Forgay v. Conrad. 
 
 b 8 H. 605, Kennedy jr. Grt. Bank. 
 
 a 18 H.. 200, Craighead v. Wilson. 
 
 a 19 H. 284, Beebe v. Russell.. 
 
 a 2 Bl. 531, Bronson v. R. R. Co. 
 
 a 7 Wall. 346j. Thompson w.Dean. 
 
 a 12 Wall. 98, French n. Shoe- 
 maker. 
 
 ffll7Wall. 17, Mavin «. l/ally. 
 
 b 22 Wall. 66, Putnam v. Bay. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 409, R. R. Co. w.Swasey 
 
 6 95 U. S. 99, Bnfflngton ^Harvey 
 
 6 95 U. S. 397, Thompson v. Mas- 
 well. 
 
344 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT ' DECISIONS. 
 
 ■WHITMAN, THOMPSON v. See Thompson v. Whitman. 
 WHITMOBE, MARSH v. See Marsh v. Whitmore. 
 WHITNEY, EX PARTE, 13 P. 404. 
 
 Supreme Court ;. mandat)ius ; 
 Louisiana ; practice U. S. courts, a 
 
 Will of Daniel Clarlc, (Gaines 
 case.) 6 
 
 a 102 U. S 
 
 WHITNEY, CURTIS v. See Cnrlis «. Whitney. 
 WHITNEY, FRISBIE v. See Frisbie v. Whitney. 
 WHITNEY, MORROW v. See Morrow v. Whitney. 
 WHITNEY, MOWBT v. See Mowry v. Whitney. 
 WHITBIDGE V. DIM., 83 H. 448. 
 
 Collision ; j-i'les governing a ves- 
 
 a 1.5 P. 13, Gaines v. Eelf. . 
 b 24 H. 554, Gaines v. Heaiien. 
 a 101 U. S. 720, ex paHe'R. E. Co. 
 1S6, ex parte Perry. 
 
 sel behind anotlier, 
 Lookouts, b 
 
 a 7 Wall. 202, The Grace GIrdler. 
 a a 14 Wall. 275, Tlie Cayuga. 
 
 a 23 Wall. 33, The Great Republic 
 b 91 U. S. 699, The Colorado. 
 
 WHITTAKER, KEENE v. See Keene v. Whittaker. 
 
 WHITTON, RAILWAY COMPANY v. See Railway Company v. •Whittou. 
 
 WHYTB V. GIBBS, 80 H. 548. 
 
 Supreme Court; mandate, a \ a 17 Wall. 283, Tyler «. Magwire. 
 WICKLIEFE, HANDtIN t. See Handlin v. Wiokliffe. 
 WTCKXIEEE, HUNT v. See Hunt v. Wiokliffe. 
 WICKUEEE V. OWINGS, 17 H. 47. 
 
 U. S. courts ; capacity to sue ; I a 21 H. 214, R. B. Co. c. Quigley. 
 how raised, a ' \ 
 
 WIGGINS V. BURKHAM, 10 Wall. 133. 
 
 Reasonable time ; when a ques- I a 91 U. S. 402, Cooke v. U. S. 
 tlon for the jury, a \ 
 
 WIGGINS, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Wiggins. 
 WILCOX, CAMPBELL v. See Campbell ■». Wilcox. 
 WILCOX V. HUNT, 13 P. 378. 
 
 Louisiana; practice of U. S- 
 courts. ' a 
 
 WILCOX T. JACKSON, 13 P. 498. 
 
 Land laws; pre-emption ; appro- 
 
 a 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 
 priation by U. S.; reservations, a 
 Mineral lands ; pre-emption of. b 
 Jurisdiction ; registers and re- 
 ceivers, c 
 Sale previous to patent, d 
 Judgments; setting aside after 
 term, e 
 Equitable titles. / 
 Titles derived from U. S. cannot 
 be controlled by State legislation, g 
 Authority of President through 
 the Secretary of War to reserve 
 land for forts ; when acts of heads 
 of departments are acts of the 
 President, h 
 
 a 15 P. 418, U. S. V. Fitzgerald. 
 6 3 H. 129, U. S. V. Gear. 
 c 3 H. 756, Hickey v. Stewart. 
 d 4 H. 19, Levi ». Thompson, 
 e 6 H. 36, Bank of U. S. v. Sims, 
 c 8 H. 531, Williamson v. Berry. 
 / 9 H. 443, Doe v. Eslava. 
 a 14 H. 271, University e. Indiana. 
 a 18 H. 21, Kissell v. Schools, 
 c 18 H. 43, Barnard c. Ashley. 
 a 20 H. 566, Ii-vine v. Marshall. 
 h 2 Wall. 537, U. S. v. Stone. 
 g 13 Wall. 104, Gibson v. Chouteau 
 c 18 Wall. 467, Thompson v. Whit- 
 man. 
 h 20 Wall. 109, Confiscation Cases. 
 h 99 U. S. 19, U. S. V. Farden. 
 AlOlU. S. 769, Wolsey « Chapman 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 345 
 
 WrLCOX V. PIUMMEB, 4 P. 180. 
 
 Statute of limitations ; wheu it | a 98 U. S. 474, Amy v. Dubuque, 
 commences to run. a \ 
 
 WILDEK, GATTLOB v. See Gaylor v. Wilder. 
 wrLBT, BKOWN v. See Brown i>. Wiley. 
 WHEY, U. S. V. See U. S. ■„. Wiley. 
 ■WILKES V. DINSMAN, 7 H. 89. 
 
 Jurisdiction ; presumptions, a 
 Officers ; action against for pun- 
 ishment inflicted on soldier. 6 
 
 WHKINS, V. S. V. See U. S. d. Wilkins. 
 
 WrLKTNSON, INSOKAWCE CO. v. See Insurance Co. v. WUkinson. 
 
 WTXKTNSON T. lEIiAND, 2 P. 656. 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatory force of 
 decisions of State courts, a 
 
 Statutes ; construction. 6 
 
 Retrospective and confirmatory 
 laws, c 
 
 Constitution; due process of law.d 
 
 a 7 H. 714, Townsend w. .Jennison 
 6 12 H. 401, Dinsman v. Wilkes. 
 
 a 5 P. 308, Hinde v. Vattier. 
 a 10 P. 294, Leland v. Wilkinson. 
 6 3 H. 56,3, U. S. v. Freeman, 
 c 24 H. 296, Bissell v Jeffersonville 
 c 1 Wall. 204, Gelpcke u Dubuque 
 c 7 Wall. 624, Beloit v. Morgan, 
 c 8 Wall. 603, Drehman v. Stifle. 
 d 13 Wall. 662, Osbora»Nicliolson 
 c 23 Wall. 149, Randell v. Kreiger. 
 6100U. S.244, Gates v. Nat. Bank 
 
 WILKINSON, I/ELAND v. See Leland v. Wilkinson. 
 
 WILLIAM BAGALET, THE, 5 Wall, 
 
 Civil war; commercial inter- 
 course, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; only appellants 
 can assign errors. 6 
 
 Effect of war on right to sue. c 
 
 Duty of citizens when war breaks 
 out. d 
 
 405. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 535, Hanger v. Abbott. 
 b 9 Wall. 672, The Quickstep. 
 c 11 Wall. 250. Levy v. Stewart. 
 6 12 Wall. 41, The Maria Martin. 
 b 12 Wall. 135, Mail Co m. Flanders 
 6 13 Wall. 741, The Mabey. 
 6 14 Wall. 201, The Merrimac. 
 6 94 U. S. 599, The Step'n Morgan 
 dlOlU. S. 617, Gates v. Goodloe. 
 
 WILLIAM KING, THE, 9 WIi. 148. 
 
 Statutes ; acts in fraud of. a 
 WILLIAMS, ALDKIDGE T. See Aldridge v. Williams. 
 WILLIAMS V. AMBOTD, 7 Cr. 433. 
 
 Jurisdiction IT. S. courts, a 
 Prize ; sale before condemna- 
 tion, b 
 
 WILLIAMS V. BAKEB, 17 Wall. 144. 
 
 Des Moines Eiver grant to Iowa 
 for railroads, a 
 
 Lands " reserved " from sale. 6 
 
 Acts making donations; pre- 
 existing rights, c 
 
 a 8 P. 50, Lee «. Lee. 
 
 a 3 P. 201, ex parte Watkins." 
 6 13 H. 512, Jecker v. Montgomery 
 
 a 17 Wall. 162, Homestead v. Val- 
 ley E. R. 
 
 b 92 U. S. 748, Leav. R. R. Co. v. 
 U.S. 
 
 c 101 U. S. 277, Broderi>. Wat. Co. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 766, WolseyuChapman 
 
 a 101 U. S. 774, Litchfield v. Web- 
 ster Co. 
 
346 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPKEMB COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 WILLIAMS T. BANK OF THE U. S., 11 "Wh. 415. 
 
 Supreme Court-; writ o£ eri-oi:; 
 dismissal; faiVure to join defend- 
 ants, a 
 
 WILLIAMS V. BANK OOF THE' U. S, 
 
 Ifegotiable paper f notice ; due 
 diligence, a 
 
 WILLIAMS, BARNES v. 
 WILLIAMS T. BENEDICT, 8 H. 107. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction ; State 
 iind Federal courts, a 
 
 Process in U". 8. eonrts; lien of 
 judgments. 6 
 
 a 7 P. 401. Owens v. Kincannon. 
 a 6 Wall. 362, Mussinau. Cavazos. 
 a 10 Wall. 417, Masterdon b. Hern- 
 don. 
 a 11 WailJ. 87, The Protector. 
 a 13 Wall. 188, Hampton v. Ronse. 
 a 18 Wall. 579; Sew. Macli. Co. Cas 
 a 20 Wall. 154, Siittpson». Greeley, 
 a p. xoi. 
 
 a 10 P. .573, Dickens ». Beall. 
 a 6 H. 236, Bowling^??., Harrison. 
 a 23 H. 377, Wisemanu CUeappeUa 
 See Barnes u. 'Williams. 
 
 a 14 H. 372; Fcale v. Pliipps. 
 a 17 H. 474, Pulffam v. Osbornp. 
 a 18 H. 504, Union Bank: v. .folly. 
 a 20 H. 591, Taylor ». Carry!. 
 a 23 H. 107, Green v. Crei^Fitow. 
 b 7 Wall. 217, Brown v. Pieixie. 
 &I2 WaW. 15». Baker ». Morton. 
 a 21 Wall. 280, Tonleyv Lavender. 
 
 WILLIAMS, BONNAEEE v. See Bonnafee v. wmiams. 
 W^ILLIAMS V. BBUnPT, 96 V. S. 176. 
 
 a 97 U. S. 463^ Keith ».. Clark. 
 h 97 tr. S. 602. Ford v. Snrgett. 
 a 99 U. 8. 190, Keteham » Backfey- 
 
 Civil war; legislation of tlie Con- 
 federate States; invalidity, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State courts; Federal question grow- 
 ing; out of the civil war. 6 
 
 WILLIAMS, BURTON v. See Burton. D. Williams. 
 WILLIAMS, GLEMENTSON v. See Clementson v.. -Winiams.. 
 WILLIAMS, eOKNELL -v. SeeComeUi). Williams. 
 WILLIAMS, FINLEY v. Siee Finley u. Williams. 
 WILLIAMS V. GIBBES, 17 H. 333". 
 
 Awards by foreign commission; 
 rights of opposing cLiimant. a 
 
 Fund in court; rights of cred- 
 itors to share iu. 6 
 
 Assets ; failure to present claims 
 to administrator, c 
 
 WILLIAMS, HODCitE v. See Kodge «.. Williams, 
 WILLIAMS V. KIRTLAND, 13 WaU. 306. 
 
 U. 8. courts ; obligatory force of I c* 21 Wall. 497, R. B. Co. s.Penn. 
 State decision, a i -.,, ^^ .-. — _ _ . 
 
 a 20 H. 535, Williams «. Gibbes. 
 a 24 H. 320, Meyer v. White. 
 6 9 Wall. 185, In re Howard, 
 c 17 WaU. 531, Prab. Works v. Co- 
 ■ lumbla College. 
 
 1 a 102 U. 8. 655, Barrett «. Holmes. 
 
 WILLIAMS, NATfLOK v. See Naylqr ■».. Williams. 
 WILLIAMS v.. OLIVER, 18 H. 119. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to 
 State courts; Fedbral question, a 
 
 a 6 Wall. 262, Milltngar v.. IlartUi- 
 
 pee. 
 
 a 13 Wall. 263, Klinger v. Missouri. 
 a 98 U. S. 141, Bank v. Board Liq. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 347 
 
 WrLtlAMS V. NORBIS, 18 Wli. 117, 
 
 Supreme Court ; writ of error to 
 State courts ; Federal question, a 
 \Vli8,t Gonstitutes the 'record,' 6' 
 Opinion ol court below, e 
 
 ■^y TTT.TATvr s V. PETTON, 4 TVli. 77. 
 
 Ministerial dirties, a 
 
 Powers to sell. 6 
 
 Tax titles, t 
 
 Deeds; depending on act in pais ; 
 party claiming under bound to 
 sliow performance, d 
 
 Certificates as evidence, e 
 
 WHXIAaiS, KICAKD V. See Ricard i). Williams: 
 WHXIAMS, STEVENSON v. See SteTensoa v. Williams. 
 WnLtlAMS V. SUEFOIK INS. CO., 13 P. 4a0. 
 
 Political questions, a | a 13 Wall. 649, WViite v. Hai-t. 
 
 a 2 P. 230, Wilson v. Creek Co. 
 a 2 P. 407, Sattertee v Matthe wsoo 
 a 3 P. 299, Harris v. Dennie. 
 a 4 P. 42-5, Craig v. Missouri. 
 a 6 P. 47, Davis v.. Pacliard. 
 a 10 P. 391, Crowoll v. Bandell. 
 a 5 H. 374, Scott v. Jones. 
 
 5 20 H. 440, SuydamiJ. Williamson, 
 c G Wall. 14S, Rector v. Ashley. 
 
 c 8 Wall. 317, Gibson v. Chouteau 
 
 6 8 Wall. 3.")7, Yonng v. Martin. 
 a 16 Wall. 189, Smith v. Adsit. 
 
 6 20 Wall. 633, Murdocku Memphis 
 6 21 Wall. 639, Moore ». Mississippi 
 
 a 16 P. 81, Cocfe V. Halsey. 
 6 5 H. 200, Taylor v. Benham. 
 c 9 H. 256, Mason v. Fearson. 
 c 16 H. 613, Early v. Doe. 
 d 2 Wall. 319, Ransom u.Williams 
 e 91 U. S. 245, Ins. Co. u. Tisdale. 
 
 a 92 U. S. 132, Phillips v. Payne., 
 
 WILUAMS, VEAZrE v. See Teazie v. WillSams. 
 ■WIIXIA3IS, WAXUEN v. See Walleu v. Williams. 
 
 WIXIilAMSON V. BAKBETT, 13 H. 
 
 Collision ; damages. 
 
 Rules of navigation. 
 
 ■WnXIAMSON T. BEKKT, 8 H. 531. 
 
 Contract for payment of antece- 
 dent debt ; what is a sale, a 
 
 U. S. courts ; obligatory force of 
 State decisions, b 
 
 Conveyance by authority of act 
 of the Legislature ; jurisdiction of 
 equity ; infants, c 
 
 Contingent remainders, d 
 
 106. 
 
 a 17 H. 173, Catharine u. Dickinson 
 a 8 Wall, 386, The Baltimore. 
 6 91 U. S. 206, The Free States, 
 
 a 11 H. 220, Warner ». Martin. 
 
 b 11 H. 317, Van Reiisselaei- v. 
 Kearney. 
 
 c 20 H. 431, Suydam W.Williamson. 
 
 c 24 H. 428, Suydam U.Williamson. 
 
 d 6 Wall. 478, Doe v. Consedine. 
 
 c 6 Wall. 729, Williamson v. Siiy- 
 son. 
 
 c 18 Wall. 467, Thompson u. Whit- 
 man. 
 
 WHIiAMSON T. KINCAJD, 4 Ball. 80. 
 
 Supreme Court; value of matter I a 4 Dall. 26, Course v. Stead, 
 in dispute ; affidavits, a | a 21 H. 392, Richmond v Milwaukee 
 
 WmiAMSON, SUYDAM V. See Snydam 1). WUliamson. 
 
 WIIXIAMSON, V. S. V. See U.,S.D. Williamson. 
 
348 
 
 MANUAL Oy SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 WILMSON T. TV ATKINS, 3 P. 63. 
 
 Adverse possession as to lessors, 
 mortgagors, trustees, and tenants in 
 common, a 
 
 Equity ; laches ; stale claims. 6 
 
 Whether vendee can dispute ven- 
 dor's title, c 
 
 Trustees cannot deny right of 
 stockholders to a distribution, d 
 
 WILMINGTON K. K. v. 
 
 a 5 P. 430, Bradstreet v. Hunting- 
 ton, 
 a 5 P. 486, Peyton v. Stith. 
 6 9 P. 413, Piatt v. Vattier. 
 6 10 P. 221, Boon v. Chiles. 
 a 13 P. 4, Woodward v. Brown. 
 a 14 P. 156, Walden ii. Bodley. 
 c 16 P. SI, Watkins v. Holman. 
 a ■ 4 H. 214, Zeller v. Eckert. 
 d 18 H. 480, Bacon v. Robertson, 
 c 5 Wall. 287, Croxall v. Shererd. 
 c 9 Wall. 601, Merryraan !) Bourne 
 
 BEID, 13 WaU. »66. 
 
 Constitution ; obligation of con- 
 tracts ; exemption from taxation, a 
 Taxation of corporations. 6 
 
 ■wUjMinqton and wbmkjn k. 
 
 Confederate money, a 
 
 WILSON v. BAKNUM, 8 H. 858. 
 
 Certificates of division, a 
 
 a 13 Wall. 375, Salt v. E. Saginaw. 
 a 15 Wall. 458, Tomlinson v Jessnp 
 a 16 Wall. 249, HumphreyMPegues 
 a 20 Wall. 43, R. R. Co. v. Reid. 
 a 21 Wall. 498, R. R. Co. v. Penn. 
 a 93 U. S. 223, Morgan v Louisiana 
 b 95 U. S. 687, Farrington k. Tenii. 
 
 K. V. KING, 91 IT. S. 3. 
 
 I £8 94 U. S. 435, Stewart v. Salamon 
 
 WILSON V. BLACKBIRD CBEEK CO 
 
 Supreme Comt ; writ of error to 
 State courts; Federal question, a 
 
 Constitution ; concurrent pow- 
 ers. 6 
 
 When the powers of the U. S. 
 exclusive, c 
 
 Regulation of commerce, d 
 
 Police powers, e 
 
 State jurisdiction over navigable 
 streams, f 
 
 WILSON V. CITY BANK, 17 WaU, 
 
 Bankruptcy ; suits by assignees ; 
 fraudulent preferences, a 
 
 a 18 H. 566, Dennistown v Stewart 
 a 1 Bl. 583, Silliman v. Bridge Co. 
 
 8 p. 345. 
 
 a 3 P. 299, Harris v. Dennie. 
 a 4 P. 425, Craig v. Missouri, 
 a 6 P. 47, Davis v. Packard. 
 a 10 P. 391, Crowell v. Randell. 
 6 14 P. 592, Holmes v. Jennison. 
 b 5 H. 573, License Cases. (Opin. 
 
 of Taney, Ch. J.) 
 c 7 H. 392, Pas'nger Cas. (Opin. 
 
 of McLean, J.) 
 b 12 H. 311, Cooley v. Wardens, 
 d 13 H. 557, Penn. «. Bridge Co. 
 e 22 H. 242, Sinuot v. Davenport. 
 6 3 Wall. 727, Oilman v. Phil. 
 6 16 Wall. 482, Osborne v. Mobile. 
 d 17 Wall. 509, R. R. Co. ». Fuller, 
 c 95 U. S. 463, Pound v. Turk. 
 6 95 U. S. 488, Hall v. De Cnir. 
 b 96 U. S. 387, Wisconsin uDuluth 
 / 99 U. S. 643, Tr. Co. v. Chicago; 
 C102U. S. 700, Mobile b. Kimball. 
 
 473. 
 
 o 20 Wall. 420, Mays v. Fritton. 
 a 21 Wall. 373, Clark v. Iselin. 
 a 21 Wall. 503, Little u Alexander 
 a 22 Wall. 178, Burnhisel u. Fir- 
 man. 
 a 94 U. S. 557, Dutcher «. Wright. 
 a 96 U. S. 540, Bank v. Warren. 
 a 102 U. S. 268, Rogers v. Palmer. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 349 
 
 WILSON, CRAIGSHEAD v. See Craigsliead v. Wilsoii. 
 WILSON T. DANIEL, 3 Dall. 401. 
 
 Supreme Court : value of matter I a 3 P. 34, Gordon v. Ogden. 
 in dispute, a I a 11 H. 525, Spear v. Place. 
 
 WILSON, DOE M. See Doe v. Wilson. 
 WILSON, KENNEDY v. See Kennedy v. Wilson. 
 WILSON V. MFE AND EIRE INS. CO., 13 P. 140. , 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error a 6 Wall. 362, Miftsinaw. Cavazos. 
 and appeals; joinder of parties, a a 10 Wall. 417, Masterdon «. Hern- 
 Wlien writ amendable, b don. 
 
 6 11 Wall. 86, The Protector. 
 
 a 18 Wall. 579, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 
 a 20 Wall. 158, Simpson v. Greeley. 
 
 WILSON, tIFE AND EIRE INS. CO. v. See LUe and Fire Ins. Co. u. Wilson. 
 
 WILSON, MAHDERVILIiE v. See Minderville «. Wilson. 
 
 WILSON, MARINE INS. CO. OF ALEXANDRIA v. See Marine Ins. Co. of 
 
 Alexandria v. Wilson. 
 YPILSON V. MASON, 1 Cr. 91. 
 
 Bona-fide purchasers, a 
 Compact between States; cannot 
 restrict the powers of Congress. 6 
 
 a 10 P. 312, Boon v. Chiles, 
 a 5 H. 225, Jones v. Van Zant. 
 6 18 H. 429, Penn. v. Wheeling 
 Bridge Co. 
 
 WILSON, NEW JERSEY v. See New Jersey v. Wilson. 
 WILSON V. ROUSSEAU, 4 H. 673. 
 
 Patents; assignees; renewals, a 
 
 Combination ; right to renewal 
 when the material ceases to exist. 6 
 
 Judicial notice of the persons 
 who preside over the Patent 
 Office, c 
 
 a 4 H. 711, Simpson v. Wilson, 
 a 4 H. 712, Wilson v. Turner, 
 a 4 H. 716, Woodworth v. Wilson. 
 6 9 H. 120, Wilson v. Simpson. 
 a 14 H. 547, Bloomer v. McQuewau 
 c 17 H. 38, K. B. Co. v. Winans. 
 a 22 H. 223, Chaffee u. Belting Co. 
 a 1 Wall. 351, Bloomer v. Millen- 
 
 a 14 H. 547, Bloomer v. McQnewan 
 6 99 U. S. 552, Hartell v. Tilghman 
 
 a 10 Wall. 380, E. R. Co. v Ti-irable 
 a 18 Wall. 416, Eunsoii v. Dodge. 
 
 WILSON V. SALAMANCA, 99 U. S. 499. 
 Municipal bonds in aid of rail- a 102 U. S. 95, Menasha v. Hazard. 
 
 roads ; consolidations ; effect on 
 
 subscription, a 
 
 WILSON T. SANDFORD, 10 H. 99. 
 
 Patent rights ; purchasers hold 
 under the common law. a 
 
 Jurisdiction of Circuit Court. 6 
 WTLSON, SHEPPARD v. See Sheppard v. Wilson. 
 WILSON, SIMPSON V. See Simpson v. Wilson. 
 WIUSON V. SMITH, 3 H. 770. 
 
 Banks ; collections, a I a 91 U. S. 314, Hoover v. Wise. 
 
 I a 96 U. S. 35, U. S. v. State Bank, 
 
 WILSON, TREBILCOCK V. See Trebiloooki). Wilson. 
 WILSON, U. S. V. See U. S. t). Wilson. 
 WILSON V. WAXI., 6 WaU. 89. 
 
 Ti'taty-niaking power, a | a 17 Wall. 247, HoUlen v. Joy. 
 
350 MANUAL OF SUPEEME OOUB.T DECISIONS, 
 
 WrLSON, WOODWORXH v. See Woodworth 51. Wilson. 
 WrLT, STICKNET v. See Stickney v. Wilt. 
 WrLTBEKGER, tJ. S. v. See U, S. ... Wrltberger. 
 WINANS V. DENMEAD, 15 H. 330. 
 
 PutPiit law; infringement, a | a 91 U. S. 183. Sewall ». Jones, 
 Sumo resultB. 6 • | 6 95 U. S. S69, Eddy ». Dennis. 
 
 WINANS T. NEW TOBK AND E. R. B. CO., 81 H. 98. 
 
 Evidencp ; experts, a 1 a 99 U. S. 658, Spring Co. v. Edgar 
 
 WINANS, YORK AND MD. R. R. v. See York and Md. E. E. v. Winajis. 
 WINCHESTER T. JACKSON, 8 Cr. 514. 
 
 Siipi-eme Court; dismissal for I a 4 Cr. 46, Montalet b. Murray, 
 want of juriisdiction; costs, a I a 9 Wall. 567, Hornthall v. CoU'r. 
 
 WINDSOR V. McVeigh, 93 U. S. 874. 
 
 Jiirisdiotion ; jnilgments without I a 100 IT. S. 23, ex ^arfe Eeed. 
 notioe. a I 
 
 WINEGAB, GRAND CHUTE v. See Grand Chute «, Winegar. 
 WINN, PATT3EKSON v. See Pa.t1ierson v. Winn. 
 WINN T. PATTERSON, 9 P- 676. 
 
 Evidence; copies; secoftdary ew- la 20 Wall. 246, Domett » Williams, 
 depoe ; lost iustniments. a I 
 
 WINNIPISEOGBE CO„ PARKER V. See Parker v. Winnipiseogee Go. 
 WINSHIP V. BANK OF THE TJ. S., 5 P. 589. 
 
 Partu«rsliip. a | a 22 H. 268, Kimbro ». BuUett. 
 
 WINSOR, KBNDAM. T. See Kendall v. Wlnsor. 
 WINSTON V. V. S., 3 H. 771. 
 
 SiipreiBG Court ; amonnt m -con- | a 16 Wall. 345, Merrill o. Petty, 
 troversy. a ,| 
 
 WINTER, NEW ORIEANS v. See Ne-sf Orleans v. Winter. 
 WINTER, SIMONTON v. See Simouton v. Winter. 
 WIRXH V. BRANSON, 98 U. S. 118. 
 
 Public lan<l; sale of; when it I a 101 U. S. 261, Simraor.so.Wagner 
 ceases to be subject to entry, a \ 
 
 \yiSCABT V. DAUCHrr, 3 Ball. 381. 
 
 Circuit Court; statement of facts 
 conclusive, when, a 
 
 Supreme Court ; appellate juris- 
 dJRtion. b 
 
 a 3 D. 337, Jeiiniiags e. Brig Pci'- 
 severance. 
 6 7 Wall. 512, ex parte McCardle. 
 6 16 Wall. .H42, Merrill v. Petty. 
 ■a IS Wall. 249, Ins. Co. v. Folsom. 
 ' 6 20 Wall. 620, Murdocke Memphis 
 a 98 U. S. 442, The Abbotsford. 
 WISE V. COI/TTMBIAN TURNPIKE CO., 7 Cr. 276. 
 
 Supreme Court; value of mat- 
 ter in dispute, a 
 
 WISE T. WTTHEBS, 3 Cr. 330. 
 
 Courts-martial, a 
 When the officers are personally 
 liable, b 
 
 a 31'. 33, Gordon B. Ogden. 
 a 15 H.207, Kanouse c. Martin. 
 a 4 Wall. 1G4, Walker e. U. S. 
 <j 16 Wall. 344, Merrill v. Petty. 
 
 o 3 P. 201, ex parte Watkins. 
 6 20 H. 77, Dynes ». Hoover. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 351 
 
 WISEMAN, ARCAMBEI, v. See Arcambel v. Wiseman. 
 
 WISTEK, BANK KENTUCKY v. See Bank Kentucky v. Wister. 
 
 WISTEB, SNEED T. See Sneed v. Wister. 
 
 WISWAXi V. CAMPBELt, 93 U. S. 347. 
 
 Bankruptcy; supervisory juris- 1 a 94 U. S. 323, Hill v. Thompsoa. 
 diction, a | a 94 U. S, 443, Coiiro v. Crane. 
 
 WTSWAtli, KAJXROAD CO. v. See Railroad Oo. „. Wiswall. 
 
 WISWAXL V. SAMPSON, 14 H. 61. 
 
 Conflict of jurisdiction; State 
 and Federal courts, a 
 Purchasers pendente lite. 6 
 
 a 14 H. 372, Pcsile v. Phipps. 
 a 17 H. 674, Pnlliam v. Osborne. 
 6 20 EI. 100, Secombe v. Steele. 
 ■a 20 IT. 596. Tavlor v. Ciirryl. 
 a 102 U. S. 262, Bank v. Calhonn. 
 
 WTTHENBURT v. V. S., 5 Wall. 881 
 
 Supreme Court; final decrees, a J 
 
 WTTHEKS T. BCrCKLET, 80 H. 90. 
 
 Constitution; fiif=t ten amend- 
 ments apply ro tlie U. S. a 
 
 States ; riglit to soil under navi- 
 gable waters. 5 
 
 WITHERS -v. GREEN, 9 H, 313. 
 
 Contract ; failure of considera- 
 tion, a 
 
 Mitigation of damages. 6 
 
 Warninty. c 
 WITHERS, WISE V. See Wise v. Withers. 
 WAI.COTT V. BES MOINES CO., 5 
 
 Public lands ; " reservation bj' 
 competent authority." a 
 
 Grants by Congress to States in 
 aid of railroads. 6 
 
 Des Moines Kiver grant to 
 Iowa, c 
 
 Acts making donations; pre- 
 existing rights., d 
 
 a 7 Wall. 346, Thompson v. Dean. 
 
 a 7 "Wall. 327, Twitchell v. Com. 
 6 23 Wall. 68, St. Clair v. Lovlng- 
 
 ston. 
 a 92 U. S. S52, TJ. S.».Criiikshank 
 
 a 11 H. 472, Van Buren v. Digues. 
 6 14 H. 442, Winder v. Caldwell, 
 c 20 H. 150, Lyou v. Bertram. 
 
 WaU. 688. 
 
 a 6 Wall. 
 
 381, Grisar » McDowell 
 6 9 Wall. 97, E. R. Co. v. Smith 
 c 17 Wall. 150. Williams v. Baker 
 c 17 Wall. 162, Homestead Co. v. 
 
 Valley Co. 
 a 92U. S. 747, Leav.R.R.uU.S. 
 dWl U. S. 277, Broderu Water Co 
 c 101 U. S. 766, Wolsey v. Chap- 
 man, 
 c 101 U. S. 774, Litchfield v. Web- 
 ster Co. 
 
 WAICOTT, DIGGS v. See Diggs v. Walcott. 
 WOLF T. STIX, 96 V. S. 541. 
 
 Bankruptcy; discharges, a 
 
 1 a 99 U. S. 6, Wolf «. Stix. 
 
 WOLSET T. CHAP3ttAN, 101 TT. S. 7S5. 
 
 a 101 U. S. 774, Litchfield v. Web- 
 ster Co. 
 
 Grants to the States for rail- 
 roads; Des Moines River grant to 
 Iowa, a 
 
 WOOB V. CARPENTER, 101 TJ. S. 136. 
 
 Limitations; concealed fraud, a J a 101 U. S. 567, Shaw v. R. R. Co. 
 
 WOOB, BAVIS V. See Davis v. Wood. 
 
352 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 WOOD V. LEDE, 4 Cr. 180. 
 
 Supreme Coiut ; return of writ 
 of error, a 
 Citation. 6 
 Motions to dismiss and to docket.c 
 
 a 7 P. 144, Picliet.t v. Lea:ei'woo(l. 
 b G H. 88, Villabolos v. U. S. 
 c 3 Wall. 103, Sparrow v. Strong. 
 a 99 U. S. 506, Grigsby v. Piircell. 
 
 WOOD, McINTIRE v. See Molntire d. Wood. 
 WOOD V. OWINGS, 1 Cr. 839. 
 
 Deeds; falUiie to record within 
 time prescribed, a 
 WOOD V. STEEI.!:, 6 Wall. 80. 
 
 Negotiable paper; blanks, a 
 
 WOOD V. CNDEBHUI., 5 H. 1. 
 
 Patentlavv; act of 1793; specifl' 
 cation, a 
 
 WOOD, U. S. V. See U. S. v. Wood. 
 WOOD T. U. S., 16 P. 348. 
 
 Duties; fraudulent invoices ; seiz- 
 ures, a 
 Statutes ; repeal by implication, h 
 Sec. 66 of tariff act of 1799. (1 St. 
 677.) c 
 
 " Probable cause." d 
 Forfeitures ; when they attach, e 
 Evidence; proof of autliority of 
 signer of ah instrument, f 
 
 a 14 H. 260, Do Lane v. Moore. 
 
 I a 92 U. S. 341, Angle v. Ins. Co. 
 I a 6 H^ 477, Hogg_«. Emerson. 
 
 WOOD V. WAGNON, 8 Cr.. 9. 
 
 U. S. courts; citizenship; how 
 averred, a 
 
 WOOD PAPER PATENT, 83 Wall. 
 
 Patent law ; reissues, a 
 
 3 H. 204, Taylor v. U. S. 
 8 H. 643, Da vies v. Fairbairn. 
 
 4 H. 243, Clifton v. U. 8. 
 4 H. 258, Bucklev v. U. S. 
 8 H. 378, Caldwell v. U. S. 
 
 c 17 H. 90. U. S. V. 67 Pcks. Goods 
 b 'il H. 311, U. S. v.. Walker. 
 d 3 Wall. 143, Cliq. Chumpaguo. 
 6 3 Wall. 633, The Eeform. 
 e 14 Wall. 56, Henderson's Spirits 
 /91 U. S. 418, Uni.Socu Faulkner 
 6 95 .U. S. 196, Pabbri w. Murpliv. 
 & 90 U. S. 140, Arthur v. Homer. 
 
 I a 8 P. 115, Brown v. Keene. 
 
 S66. 
 
 a 98 U. S. 139, Powder Co. b.Pow- 
 I der Works. 
 
 WOODUEE, McGAVOCK v. See MoGavock v. Woodlief . 
 WOODMAN, STIMPSON v. See Stimpson v. Woodman. 
 WOODKIDGE, THOMAS V. See Thomas d. Woodridge. 
 WOODKOW, COOK V. See Cook d. Woodrow. 
 WOODKUFF, GENOA v. See Genoa v. Woodruff. 
 WOODBDEF, HANNAUEB v. See Hannaner v. Woodruff. 
 WOODRUFF V. PARHAM, 8 Wall. 139. 
 
 Constitution ; regulation of com- a 8 Wall. 150, Hinson u. Lott. 
 merce ; tax on imports, a a 12 Wall. 429, Ward «. Maryland 
 
 Taxing power of the States. 6 a 13 Wall. 34, Low u. Austin. 
 
 a 15 Wall. 280, St.Fr't Tax Case. ' 
 a 15 Wall. 296, St. Tax B. Kec'pts 
 a 16 Wall. 482, Osborne v. Mobile. 
 a 91 U. S. 282, Welton ». Missouri 
 6 96 U. S. 446, Murray v. Charles- 
 ton. 
 a 97 U. S. 673, Cook v. Penn. 
 a 100 U. S. 437, Guy w. Baltimore. 
 a 100 U. S. 077, Mach. Co. u. Gage. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 353 
 
 WOODRUrF V. TRAPNAM-, 10 H. 190. 
 
 ConstiMitipn ; obliojatioii ot con- 
 tracts; ag'i-et'inent by Stiite to ac- 
 cept bills of bank in payment of 
 debts; gnaranty. a 
 
 U. S. conrts ; jiu'lsdiction wlicre 
 State is interested; court will only 
 regard tlie parties on the recoi-d. b 
 
 a 10 H. -221, Panp v. Drew. 
 a 2 Wall. 21, Hawtborn !). Calef 
 a S Wall. 63, Fnrnian v. NIcliol. 
 6 10 Wall. 221, Davis v. Gray. 
 a 97 U. S. 4.55, Keith v. Clark. 
 a 102 U. S. 079, Hartnian c. Green- 
 how. 
 
 a 1 Wall. 96, Mercer v. Haekett. 
 a 15 Wall. 372, Grand Chnte r. 
 Winegar. 
 
 I a IS H. 534, Hudgins v. Ivemp. 
 
 WOODS V. LAWRENCE CO.. 1 Bl. 386. 
 
 Comity bonds in aid of railroads ; 
 sale of bonds at a discoinit con- 
 trary to the act; bona-fide holders, a 
 
 WOODWARD V. BROW^N, 13 P. 1. 
 
 Certiorari, a 
 
 WOODS V. YOUNG, 4 Cr. 237. 
 
 Continnance ; discretionarj' with I a 1 P. 165, Wright v. Hollingsworth 
 court; not assignable for error, a. 
 
 WOODWARD, DART. COLLEGE v. See Dartmouth College >'. Woodward. 
 WOODWORTH, DAY v. See Day i'. Woodwcrth. 
 WOODWORTH, LIVINGSTON v. See LL-linRston v. Woodwortli. 
 WOODWORTH » . WILSON, 4 H. 713. 
 
 Patent law; infringement, a | a 7 H. 521, Moore v. Marsh. 
 WOOLSEY, DODGE v. See Dodge r. Woolsej-. 
 WORCESTER v. GEORGIA, 6 P. 515. 
 
 Indians; authority of U. S. Gov- ; a 3 Wall. 420, V. H. r. Holliday. 
 ernnient. a b a Wall. 760, Kansas Indians. 
 
 Treaties with : eonstrnction. b a 17 Wall. 237. Holden v. Joy. 
 Riglit to their lands, c , c 19 Wall. 593, IT. S. v. Cook. 
 
 ' a 93 U. S. 193, U.S. /-.Gals. Whisk 
 
 WORKMAN, V. S. v. See U. S. u. Workman. 
 WORMELY V. WORMELY, 8 Wh. 421. 
 
 Purchasers bona-flde ; notice, a i a 10 P. 199, Boon v. Chiles. 
 
 Purchasers of trnst estate. 6 
 .foiiider of formal parties will 
 
 not ou!5t jin-isdiction of U. S. 
 
 courts. I- 
 
 \ b 4 H. 5.52, Michond v. Girod. 
 
 a 11 H. 392, Fowler v. Merrill. 
 
 c 17 H. 137, Shields v. Barrow. 
 
 c IS H. 408, Wood v. Davis. 
 
 c 18 Wall. 586, Sew. Ma. Co. Case. 
 WORTHINGTON, McCABE v. See MoCiabe v. Worthington. 
 WORTHY V. COMMISSIONERS, 9 Wall. 613. 
 
 Supreme Court; writ of error to a 16 Wall. 352, Marqueze!'. Blooin. 
 State courts; Federal question. « 
 WRIGHT V. BALES, 2 Bl. 635. 
 
 U. S. courts ; evidence ; State 
 law; rule of decision, a 
 
 WRIGHT V. ELLISON, 1 Wall. 16. 
 
 Equitable assignments, a 
 
 WRIGHT V. HOLLINGSWORTH, 1 
 
 Jurisdiction, a 
 
 Pleading over ; waiver of de- 
 muirer, 5 
 
 WRIGHT V. MATTISON, 18 H. 50. 
 
 ■ Limitations ; color of title, a 
 23 
 
 I a 1 Wall. 68, Kyan v. Bindley. 
 I a 102 U. S. 165, Potter v. Banl<. 
 
 I a 21 Wall. 446, Trist v. Child. 
 
 P. 169. 
 
 a 10 P. 469, Voorheesv. Bank U. S. 
 6 7 II. 714, Towiisend v. Jennison 
 
 a 1 Wall. 641, Beaver v. Taylor. 
 
354 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 WEIGHT V. TEBiilTS, 91 U. S. 853. 
 
 Altoi'iieys; oiiiitingeiit fees, a | a 93 U. S. o.o7, Sr.iiiitoii ». Embi-ey. 
 
 "WRIGHT CO., EMIGRANT CO. v. See Emigrant Co. v. Wright Oo. 
 WYLIE V. COXE, 1.5 H. 415. 
 
 Attorneys; eoiitiiig-ent fees, a | a 93 U. S. 558, Stanton v. EQibi-ey. 
 AVYMAN, BABCOCK v. See Bahcocli: v. Wyma,n. 
 WYNN, GARLAND v. See Garland v. Wynn. 
 WYNN, THORNTON v. See Thornton v. Wynn. 
 YARD, NEAV JERSEY v. See New Jersey v. Yard. 
 YATES V. MILWAUKEE, 10 Wall. 497. 
 
 Ripai-iMii i-iglits. a I a 18 Wall. 64, Weber ». Corn'ri!. 
 
 Obsti-iictions t(i navigation, b | 6 21 Wall. 892, Atlee v. Packet Co. 
 
 YATES, TURNER v. See Turner i>. Yates. 
 
 YATES, U. S. .-. See U. S. v. Yates. 
 
 YEATMAN v. SAVINGS INSTITUTION, 95 U. S. 764. 
 
 Bankruptcy; assignee takessiib- > a 101 U. S. 738, Stevvait v. I'latt. 
 ject to equities, a 
 
 YEATON V. BANK OE ALEXANDRIA, 5 Cr. 49. 
 
 Usage, a 
 
 Negotiable paper; notice; due 
 diligence; insolvency 
 
 a 9 Wli. .582, Renner v. Bank Col. 
 a 6 P. 715, U. S. V. Arreilondo. 
 b 3 H. 529, Camden v. Doremns. 
 
 YEATON V. FRY, 5 Cr. 335. 
 
 Prize; running blockade, a 
 
 YEATON V. LENOX, 7 P. 280. 
 
 Supreme Court ; citation and writ \ a 6 H. 88, Villabolos v. U. S, 
 
 a 2 Wall. 151, The Circassian. 
 
 of eiror ; retni-n of. 
 Second appeal, b 
 
 I b H l-I. IIQ. U. S. V. Cnrry. 
 , a 18 H. 534, Hudgins v. Kemp. 
 ; a 99 U. S. 609, Nat. Bank v. Bank. 
 
 YEATON V. LYNN, 6 V. 830. 
 
 Uistrictof Col.; Orptuins' Conrt.a | a S H. 409, AVest v. Smith. 
 
 YEATON V. U. S., 5 Cr. 381. 
 
 Admiralty jurisdiction ; seizures 
 on navigal)l(^ waters, a 
 Final decrees, b 
 Penalties; reniis.-ion. c 
 RepeaU; pending cases, d 
 
 YERGER, EX I'ARTB, 8 Wall. 85. 
 
 SupreirieCoui-t ; Iiabeas corpus, a 
 
 Act of 1867.. b 
 
 Statutes ; i-epeal by implication, c 
 
 a 7 Cr. 112. Whelan v. U. S. 
 bSF. 64, U. S. V. Preston, 
 c 3 H. 548, Maryland !). B. R. Co. 
 d 9 Wall. 375, Assessor v. Osboni. 
 
 a IS Wall. 166, ex parte Lauge. 
 
 b 97 U. S. 519, Coleman v. Temi. 
 
 c 97 U. S. 543, Welch v. Cook. 
 
 a 100 tJ. S. 342, ex parte Virginia. 
 
 a 100 U. S. 374, ex parte Siebold. 
 YOEMANS, MERRILL v. See Merriil v. Y'oeraans. 
 YONLEY V. LAVENDER, 81 Wall. 876. 
 
 U. S. courts; Probate Courts; [ a 92 U. S. 121, Kittredge v. Race, 
 ad-ministi'ation. a 
 
 YONTZ V. U. S., 33 H. 499. 
 
 California; Mexican titles; snr- | a 1 Wall. 316, U. S. v. D'Aguirre. 
 plus, a I 
 
 YORBA^ -U. S. V. Sue U, S.,c.-yorba. 
 
MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 355 
 
 YORK CO. > . CENTRAL R. R. CO., 3 AVall. 111. 
 
 Deposition-;; obiectioii'? to. a 
 Carrie i-s ; rinlit to limit liability 
 by special con tract. 6 
 Jfeglisence. c 
 
 3 Wall. li)2, BlacUlmrn v. Craw- 
 ford. 
 a 15 Wall. 160, Sohuttc v. Thomp- 
 son. 
 b 16 Wall. 32S, R. U. r. M'f'o- Co. 
 17 Wall. :i7o, R. R. LocUwood. 
 a 21 Wall. lis. Doanc v. Glenn. 
 6 21 Wall. 267, Exp. Co.u Caklwell 
 c 93 U. S. 188, Bank o. Exp. Co. 
 
 YORK AND CUMBERLAND R. R. CO. v. MYERS, 18 H. 251. 
 
 Bills of exceptions, a I a 1 Wall. .598, Ponieroy v. Bank, 
 
 Exception.s to awards, b ' b '2 Wall. 128, Heckcrs v. IA>wler. 
 
 6 91 V. S. 131, R. R. Co. v. Myers. 
 
 YORK AND MARYLAND R. R. CO. v. WINANS, 17 H. 38. 
 
 Corporations ; franchise ; sale i a 101 U. S. 84, Thomas v. R. R. 
 and transfer, a 
 
 YOSEMITE VALLEY CASE, 15 Wall. 77. 
 
 Xo title acqnired by mere settle- 
 ment upon the pnblic lands as 
 against the U. S. a 
 
 When the settler regarded as the 
 equitable owner. 6 
 
 YOrNG V. BANK OF ALEXANDRIA, 4 Cv. 39G. 
 
 a 91 U. S. 338, Shepley v. Cowan. 
 a 92 U. S. 319, BriUo-e v. R. R. Co. 
 a 97 IT. S. 581, Hnsmer v. Wallace. 
 6 9S U. S. 121, Wirth v. Branson. 
 
 Supreme Court; writs of error 
 to courts of the District of Colum- 
 bia, a 
 
 Leijislatiire cainiot harg-ain away 
 the right of administering justice. 6 
 
 YOUNG V. BLACK, 7 Or. 566. 
 
 Demnrrei- to evidence, a 
 Res judieala. b 
 Judgment ; mei'ger. c 
 
 YOUNG V. BKYAJ*, 6 Wh. 146. 
 
 Negotiiible paper ; indorsees; suit 
 in the U. S. courts ; llth section of 
 judlciar}' act. a 
 
 No protest required on promis- 
 sory note. 6 
 
 a 8 Cr. 251. Carter v. Cutting-. 
 b 4 Wh. 240, Bank v. Oakley. 
 a 19 Wall. 64, R. R. r. Churcli. 
 6 98 U. S. 606, U. S. v. Pao. R. Co. 
 
 a 20 H. 436, Suydam i). Williamson. 
 6 24 H. 344, S. P. Co. v. Sickles. 
 b 24 H. 579. Gaines v. Hennen. 
 c 6 Wall. 234, Mason v. Eldred. 
 6 7 Wall. 105, Aurora v. West. 
 
 a 9 Wh. 538. Mollau v. Torrance. 
 a 11 P. 82, Evans v. Gee. 
 a 16 P. 93, Keary v. Far. Bank* 
 6 2 H. 70, Bmke v. McKay. 
 a o li. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 a 13 H. 186, Colfee v. Plant. Bank. 
 
 YOUNG, CLARK v. See Clark v. Young. 
 YOUNG V. GODBE, 16 Wall. 564. 
 
 Interest, a | a 22 Wall. 176, Burnhisel u Firman 
 
 YOUNG V. GRUNDY, 6 Cr. 51. 
 
 Equity ; pleadings ; admissions | a 16 P. 155, U. S. v. Miranda., 
 in answer, a " a 7 Wall. 211, Brown u. Pierce. 
 
 Case heard on pleadings, b | 6 17 Wall. 528, Board Pub. Works 
 
 Final decrees, c u. Col. College. 
 
 j c 23 Wall. 288, Thomas v. World- 
 ridge. 
 
 YOUNG, INS. CO. V. See Ins Co. v. Young. 
 
 YOUNG, MARINE INS. CO. v. See Marine Ins. Co. i.. Young. 
 
.356 
 
 MANUAL OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. 
 
 YOUNG V. MARTIN, 8 WaU. 354. 
 
 Pleafliiio^ ; waiver of demmrei'. a a 10 Wall. 422, Campbell ». Wilcox 
 
 Exceptions, b a 12 Wall. 84, R. R. Co. v. Hai ris. 
 
 Supreme Court ; what constitutes 6 21 Wall. 162, Ins. Co. v. Sea. 
 
 "the record." c c 91 U. S. 133, R. R. v. Trustees. 
 
 YOUNG, STRINGER v. See Stringer u. TounK. 
 
 YOUNG, U. S. V. See U. S. d. Young. 
 
 YOUNG V. V. S., 97 U. S. 39. 
 
 Civil war; capture of cotton, a | a 97 U. S. 605, Ford v. Surgett. 
 
 YOUNG, 'WOOD V. See Wood v. Young. 
 YOUNGE V. GUILBEAU, 3 -Wall. 641. 
 
 Deeds; delivery, a \ a 5 Wall. 86, Parmeleeu. Simpson. 
 
 YULEE, U. S. V. See U. S. ■v. Yulee. 
 YUIBE V. VOSE, 99 U. S. 539. 
 
 Removals, a I a 100 U. S. 474, Removal Cases. 
 
 ZABRISKIE V. CLEVEI.AND, &c., R. R. CO., 33 H. 400. 
 
 Corporations; contracts; repre- 
 sentations; estoppel, a 
 Guaranty. 6 
 
 ZACHARIE, BLACK v. 
 ZACHAKIE, BOYLE v. 
 ZANB, MATHEWS v. 
 ZANE, PRENTICE v. 
 ZELLEK V. ECKEKT, 4 H 
 
 Trusts; limitations, a 
 Bills oE exceptions. 6 
 
 a 24 H. 300, Bissell v .Jeflfersonville 
 a 24 H. 375, Amey v. Alleghany. 
 u, 2B1.722, Moran v. Miama Co. 
 a 7 Wall. 413, R. R. v. Howard. 
 6 20 Wall. 311, Memphis!). Brown. 
 a 93 U. S. 513, Randolph v. Post. 
 a 94 U. S. 73, Leavenworth Co. u. 
 
 Barnes. 
 a 99 U. S. 96, Hackett v. Ottawa. 
 See Black v. Zacharie. 
 See Boyle v. Zacharie. 
 See Mathews v. Zane. 
 See Prentice v. Zane. 
 389. 
 
 a 5 H. 260, Taylor v. Benham. 
 
 ZELLNER, EX PARTE, 9 Wall. 344. 
 
 Repealing statutes., a 
 Captured and abandoned prop- 
 erty act. 6 
 
 6 5 H. 288, Phillips v. Preston. 
 6 11 H. 158, U. S. V. Morgan. 
 6 18 H. 248, York R. R. v. Myers. 
 b 1 Bl. 220, Johnson v. Jones. 
 
 a 11 Wall. 22. Ins. Co. v. Dunham. 
 b 22 Wall. 96, Haycraft v. U. S.