(Horn? II IGaui i>rl|oal Bbtarg uw cco,i*;2['2^."„""'™™"y Library HV 6534.W4A6 1881 Mi?i!iiMiiiH!rii)C.!l'jI!,1J,. ,S?. J.!!Ti.. pity / 3 1924 024 892 824 CJnrtifU ICaui irljool IGibtarg HV 6534.W4A6 1881 Beautiful victim of Eim city / 3 1924 024 892 824 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/cletails/cu31924024892824 Oil' THE ELM CITY TRAGEDY. Containing a Full and Complete Account of the Life and Deatli of JENNIE E. CRAMER. GIVlNd ALL THE EVIDENCE THAT LED THE JUUY TO HOLD JAMES 'MALLEY, Jr., AS HER MURDERER, AND TO DENOUNCE WALTER E. MALLEY AND BLANCHE DOUGLASS AS AIDERS AND ABETTORS. CO., P*xiblisl:iers, -eet. New York. THE BEAUTIFUL VICTIM The Elm City. Fl/LL, FAIR, AND IMPARTIAL NARRATIVE OF ALL THAT IS KNOWN OF THE TERRIBLE FATE OF THE TRUSTING AND UNFORTUNATE JENNIE E. CRAMER, GIVING ALL THE PARTICULARS THAT CAN BE ASCERTAINED ABOUT MISS ANNIE BLANCHE DOUGLASS, WALTER MALLEY, AND JAMES MALLEY, Jr., AS ALLEGED PARTICIPANTS IN THIS TERRIBLE SOCIAL TRAGEDY. NEW YORK: M. J. IVERS & CO., Publishers. Copyrighted, 1881. PREFACE. Had a thunderbolt from a cloudless sky dashed to fragments the noblest elm in the City of New Haven, it could not have so startled the inhabi- tants as did the announcement that a young lady of their own acquaintance had probably been cruelly outraged, and either done to death in a most fiendish manner, or else driven to take her own life to drown the recollec- tion of the barbaroVis treatment she had received from two reputed respect- able citizens. It has been for long the custom of the dwellers in quiet country towns to talk with pious horror of the " dangerous classes," and shudder at any allusion to the horrid roughs of large cities ; but it is time to call a truce and inquire if there is not spreading through the so-called Upper Ten in rural places a dissolute style of life that spares no woman in its lust, and spares no life if it interferes with their social position. While our noble President is lying on a bed of pain, barely holding on to existence by a slender thread, from a wound basely and causelessly inflicted by a wretch who was but lately the pet of people who affect superior piety, comes the announcement that a most fiendish outrage, and probable murder has been committed right in the heart of " a land of steady habits." In this book we shall tell " the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth ;" believing fully in the majestic motto, " Let justice be done, though the heavens fall. " t i i lUI THE BEAUTIF S w o H a w a w > n > a > w ered will show in what direction this discrepancy is likely to lead. In the first place, the two Malleys testified that they did not see Jennie Cramer alive after Thursday morning, and Miss Douglass testified that she only saw her once, and that was in a street car going toward the New Havtn depot. Walter Malley testified that when he learned from Miss Douglass of this fact he started at once for New York, supposing that Jennie had gone thither, but when he got as far as Stamford, he got a dispatch from his cousin Tames stating that Jennie was all right, and telling him to come back here, which he did. He made no explanation of why he followed Jennie or of how James knew that she was all right if he had not seen her, nor did James explain the matter, but both insisted that they did not see Jennie alive after Thursday morning. This latter declaration is undoubtedly false ; as I wrote yesterday, the clerk of Kedcliff's restaurant says, and there is documentary evidence of his assertion, that Walter Malley took supper with the two girls on Thursday night at the restaurant. The check for the sup- per is now in the possession of C. F. BoUman, who is acting as counsel for the coroner's jury. After the discovery had been made by a New Haven newspaper man that Redclifi's clerk was ready to give this evidence Wal- ter Malley, with his counsel, visited the restaurant and demanded the checks be given to him. THE THEORY OF SUICIDE NOT BELIEVED. As to any other of Jennie Cramer's movements during Thursday and Friday, nothing is known by the public. That a girl so well known as she was should have been around New Haven for two days and a night and not be recognized seems unlikely, and it is therefore generally believed that she was in retirement somewhere and very probably in company, at least part of the time, with the people who falsely swore that they had not seen her. It is true that there were a number of people who were reported to have said that they saw her on the West Shore on Friday evening, but only two of them now stick to the story, and it is thought she did not spend the evening there. It has been thought that she realized her shame when it was too late and committed suicide, but the suicide theory is not generally adopted. It is argued that if she were alive when she went into the water, and had died by drowning, there would be water found in the body, and if she had killed herself by poison she would not have been found in the water, and even if it be supposed that she died on the shore and staggered or fell into the water the laceration of her face (for there was a cut on the forehead and another on the hip) remain unexplained. This laceration, it is believed, was caused by her being dragged over the sand or shells by the tide. It is thought possible that she may have killed herself with poison and that some person may have carried her body to the shore and thrown it in. Differ- ent stories of wagons being heard near the beach on Friday night have been told, but none of them bear investigation any more than the stories of persons who claimed to have seen her on the beach on Friday evening. Popular opinion here points to the theory that she was murdered, and sus- picion is naturally directed toward the three persons last known to be in her company, though no strong case has yet been made out against them, nor, indeed, any case at all, excepting by their own contradiction. No further exposition of the domestic arrangements of the Malley house- hold has been made public than the evidence in relation to this visit of the 19 two girls to the two young men. This, to say the least, was peculiar. Walter Malley received his cousin and the young ladies in his father's house, where his father's family all live., The party was in a room apart from all the other inmates of the house, and care was taken to prevent the servants from knowing of the presence of the two girls, or at least from seeing them. They were entertained with a light supper of cakes and wines. None of them drank very heavily, according to their own testimony, none other being available, but before the evening was over Blanche Douglass complained of not being well, and said that she felt unable to return to her hotel. Jennie Cramer, although she had previously refused to remain away from home overnight, was induced to stay on this occasion. What passed during the night is only known by conjecture and from the testimony of the two Malley boys and the Douglass woman. They testify that the girls slept together in a room by themselves, and that no impro- priety marked the occasion. The young men both corroborated this, say- ing that they both slept in another room, and that they knew nothing of the girls' departure early next morning. To keep the reader fully apprised of all the facts and opinions in this mysterious case, we will now furnish a re'sum/ in which a running com- mentary will be given along with them. The respective dates will show exactly how the investigation progressed, and also what was thought of the developments from time to time. This summary is mainly taken from the New York Herald telegraphic reports. New Haven, Conn., August ii, i88t. The mystery attending the death of Jennie Cramer, which has been growing deeper and deeper as time goes by, was by no means cleared up to-day by the developments which have been made by the eijterprise of the press. Nothing so far has been learned in any official way in regard to the crime, and the adjournment of the inquest for a week was apparently for the purpose of allowing the public to collect what evidence was obtain- able, and so save expense to the taxpayers and trouble to the officers of the law. The developments spoken of are mainly the discovery of testi- mony that goes far to contradict the evidence given by the persons origi- nally suspected by reason of their being in company with the unfortunate girl only a short time before her death and by reason of the suspicious cir- cumstances of the association. It will be remembered that Jennie Cramer's body was found on Saturday morning last about five o'clock and that she had not been home after Thursday morning, at which time she received a scolding from her mother for having stayed away the previous night in company with a woman who passed by the name of Douglass ; and with Walter and James Malley she left home with the Douglass woman and was not seen again alive by her relatives. Of course the three persons men- tioned were first questioned. Even such officials as have charge of this case could scarcely fail to perceive the necessity for that, although, as one of the lawyers in the case said to-day, " all they have done so far is to pre- pare a case for the defence." At the inquest the Douglass woman and the two " Malley boys," as they are called here, swore that they had not seen Jennie Cramer after Thursday morning. This, if it were true, would leave two days and a night unaccounted for in the girl's life, for on Friday night she was certainly seen alive by a number of persons near the place where her body was found on Saturday morning. 20 POSITIVE TESTIMONY. But although the testimony now obtained is not yet sworn to there is no doubt it will be, and it directly contradicts Jennie Cramer's three com- panions. The Douglass woman testified that she spent Friday night at the Elliott House, at which hotel she was a guest. It was shown that she was registered at the Branford Point Hotel ten miles away, but she swore that she returned from there to the Elliott House and entered the hotel through the office entrance about eleven o'clock, and did so because the ladies' entrance was locked. Passing through the office she went to her room, and remained there until the next day. When the two chambermaids went to Miss Douglass' room on Saturday morning she was out and her bed had not been disturbed. One of the domestics remarked that Miss Douglass had made her own bed and thought it rather a strange proceed- ing. It was some time after the room had been put in order that Miss Douglass had returned to the hotel. The hotel authorities flatly contradict the woman's statement about entering the hotel through the office. If she had done so, such an unusual proceeding would have attracted the attention of the clerk, who is positive that Miss Douglass did not enter the hotel at the hour she says — eleven o'clock — or any other hour of the night. To say she entered through the office because the ladies' entrance was locked is looked upon as sheer nonsense, because the ladies' entrance is kept locked both day and night. While stopping at the hotel she was out many nights much later than eleven o'clock, and was always admitted at the ladies' en- trance after ringing the bell. "What do you think of Miss Douglass' statement about this ?" was asked of a gentleman connected with the hotel. " I think she lies : yes, I know she lies. She never stayed here Friday night. She did not get in until about nine Saturday morning, and she could never have entered through the office, or she would have been seen." " How many nights was she away from the hotel ?" " Two, Wednesday and Friday." ANOTHER CONTRADICTION. Another important contradiction, which can and doubtless will be laid before the jury, is that of a clerk in a restaurant in this city, who says that instead of it being true that the Malleys did not see Jennie Cramer after Thursday morning, his record shows that on Thursday night, about half- past ten o'clock, Walter Malley came in with two ladies and had supper. He is positive about it, and is certain one of the females was Miss Blanche Douglass, whom he had frequently seen with Walter Malley, and the other he identifies as Jennie Cramer, after seeing her picture take i by Bowman. But this is not the only reason that he is positive of the identity of the two girls. He remembers distinctly when Miss Douglass, accompanied by a lady, came in Thursday morning for breakfast, and he is positive the two ladies that were accompanied by Walter Malley in the evening were the same two that had breakfast together in the morning. James Malley was not with the party. It was late when they left, eleven o'clock or after, and they were the last custom&rs served that night. The check for the supper is on file, and was shown, together with that for the breakfast of the two women, to a reporter this afternoon. The plot has thickened, and by to- morrow it is confidently expected that a consecutive story of all the cir- cumstances can be told which will serve to indicate what the cause of Jennie Cramer's death was. 21 New Haven, August 13, 1881. After an entire week of masterly inactivity the authorities of this city and the amiable gentlemen who run the few public affairs of the little ham- let of West Haven came to the conclusion that something ought to be done in regard to the death of Jennie Cramer, and took steps to secure the arrest of Blanche Douglass, the woman who was associated with the story of the unfortunate girl's last days. It will be remembered that this witness, after telling a story that has been since shown to be false in several particu- lars, and after having acknowledged being with Jennie overnight on Wed- nesday in the Malley house, and denied seeing her after Thursday morn- ing, was allowed to walk quietly away and leave the State. Such a thing was at once denounced by the public, and the neglect of the authorities to keep her at least within reach was denounced as stupidity or worse. The peculiar machinery of the law was set up by the officials as a defence, and after they had proclaimed for four days that they had no power or right to arrest the woman they did exactly that. After they determined, however, to do this, they only accomplished it with the aid of a Herald reporter, who had two days before ascertained from Captain Williams that he knew Blanche Douglass and had his eye on her. When the authorities here ex- pressed a doubt whether they would be able to find her in case they thought best to arrest her, the reporter informed them that he would give them the assurance that she could be found if officially sought. On Friday night they sent to him in great haste, saying that a warrant was issued for her arrest, and that her counsel had learned of it and had started for New York, and asking him (the reporter) to make sure of her arrest, which he did by telegraphing to Captain Williams. The warrant that was issued was for perjury. Police Commissioner Catlin, of this city, said to-day that a number of things were being done that ought to have been done a week ago. The Douglass woman, he said, ought to have been arrested at once and not allowed to see any one. Yesterday," said he, " I came to the conclusion that it was time New Haven did something, so I went to the Chief of Police and asked him what had been done by him. He said he had not made any very active move for the reason that it was not a New Haven case. I told him it was time we did something, and if any expense was incurred it would be made right by the Police Commissioners. It was then decided to arrest the woman, and a detective was sent to New York to arrest her and bring her to New Haven." STRANGE CONNECTICUT LAWS. Police Commissioner BoUman, who agreed, after almost a week, that it was time to arrest a woman suspected of complicity in the murder of a New Haven girl, says in his capacity as counsel to the coroner's jury, that the New Haven police had no right to arrest anybody on suspicion of com- mitting a murder in West Haven without a warrant from West Haven ; and further, that the justice of the peace who acts as coroner has no right to arrest anybody on suspicion of murder, nor had the coroner's jury any right to order such an arrest. The arrest, however, was made, as was said, by Captain Williams, in New York, and the woman making no objection to being taken from one State to another, she was brought here this afternoon. 22 \ Blanche's statement to the police. Blanche Douglass arrived in New Haven at ten minutes past six p.m. in charge of the detective who went to New York after her. She was dressed in a plain travelling suit and brought no baggage excepting a valise. She appeared troubled and distressed, and as she passed through a crowd of by- standers to the carriage that was in waiting she put up her hand in such a way as to hide her face from the too curious gaze of those who recognized her. She was driven directly to Police Headquarters, where she was questioned by Chief of Police Webster. His interview with her was pri- vate, and the only knowledge the public have of her statements is from the chief's report. According to this she said : "I will tell you all I know about the case ; I told a wrong story about the Wednesday night we were at the Malley house ; was there in one room with Walter Malley, and Jen- nie Cramer was in another room with James Malley ; I do not want to see any of the Malleys. I do not want to be locked up in a cell such as I was locked up in to-day. I want to go where it is comfortable. If you will treat me well I will tell you all I know about the matter." " Is it true that you left Jennie Cramer's house with her last week, Thurs- day morning ?" asked the chief. " No, I did not, and I never saw her again after I saw her on the car bound for West Haven, as I supposed." To other officials who questioned her she told substantially the same story, giving a little more detail. Her counsel advises her, naturally enough, not to talk to any one but the authorities, and she has been subjected to no cross-examination. The only action that was taken was in relation to the prisoner's custody. She was arraigned almost immediately before Justice of the Peace Booth in West Haven, and charged with perjury in having sworn that she slept in the Elliott House on Friday night and that she did not see Jennie Cramer alive after Thursday morning. Her counsel, Mr. Blydenburgh, asked that she be admitted to bail, and Mr. Bush, counsel for the Grand Jury in this case, asked that the bail be fixed at $3000. Mr. Blydenburgh claimed that this was excessive, and it was fixed at $1000. As she was unable to furnish bonds for that amount she was remanded to the care of Deputy Sheriff Peck, and with the consent of the justice was taken to the deputy sheriff's house for the night. She had begged that she should not be locked in a cell, and as no one desired to have her locked up, it is likely that she will be kept in nominal custody only. Bail will probably be given soon. After she had been arraigned and relieved by not being locked up she exclaimed : " Oh, I am so happy ! I have told the truth now, and I am sorry I ever did anything else." Naturally the Malleys refuse to say a word to any one, but keep their own counsel in regard to the case, and what their line of action will be in the present juncture can only be guessed. The fact of their having testified to having spent the night where the two women were in the Malley's house in a separate room from them, and having testified that they did not see Jennie Cramer after Thursday morning, seems to make the case as strong against them as against the women. To-night they are both in con- sultation with their counsel, and with hers. But, of course, no particulars of tlieir talk or plans have been obtained. 23 The popular feeling in regard to the arrest is shown very clearly by the editorial utterance of the New Haven Union this afternoon. It is exactly what one hears said on almost any street corner at almost any hour in the day. The Union s»ys : " From the confession of Blanche Douglass yesterday in regard to what transpired at the Malley residence on Wednesday night, it is clear that James Malley, Jr., is an important witness. He was the close companion or lover of the dead girl. He cohabited with her on Wednesday night, even if he did not assault her. The case has reached that stage now where the strong arm of the law must be exerted to get at the bottom facts. This is not a time for dilly dallying." The question of expense alluded to above has been an important con- sideration, in the estimation of the people charged with the solution of the mystery. As a detective said to me yesterday, " Every time I go out to look at anything about this case I have to pay my own expenses and I can't afford to do that." One of the coroner's jury, with true Yankee thrift, suggested the other day that some of the expenses of the investigation might be defrayed by putting the pictures of Jennie Cramer on sale, but the suggestion was not adopted. It is perhaps fair to suppose, now that something has really been done which shows an intention to work up the case, something more will be done, but so far there is no particular reason to suspect the West Haven authorities of being in earnest. As an example of the manner in which the investigation is not being pursued City Attorney Pickett's statement to-day is of interest. He said : "I am in a quandary. I don't know what to do. I would give a great deal to discover the result of that autopsy, but I cannot. Dr. Prudden is in New York, bat even if I saw him I am assured that he would tell me nothing, all present at the autopsy having been pledged by the jury of inquest to say nothing about its result until the time comes for them to testify before the jury, which is next Tuesday." One result of the delay has undoubtedly been good. It is certain that a good deal of testimony has been discovered by the enterprise of the press that the coroner's jury would never have been likely to get at unaided. Several persons have volunteered the information that they saw Jennie Cramer in company with some man on Friday. None of these stories ap- pear to be entirely reliable, excepting that told by two young men, William Twining and George Audley, who met her walking in company with James Malley, Jr., at the junction of Temple Street and Whitney Avenue in the afternoon of Friday. Twining knew her perfectly well, having been a schoolmate of hers, and Audley knew Malley. Audley did not know the girl, and asked his companion who she was. Unless the arrest of the two Malleys shall be decided on it does not seem likely to-night that any further important developments will be made before the meeting of the coroner's jury next Tuesday. Dr. Prudden, who reached this city at nine o'clock yesterdav morning on his return from New Haven, says that a microscopical examination of the remains has yielded no evidence of the presence of any preparation of opium. He cannot give the pubhc all the results of his investigations, as the coroner's jury have pledged him to silence. He intimates, however, that the medical branch of the inquiry is to be yet further prosecuted. H New Haven, Conn., August i4i 1881. There is no longer any reason to doubt that there is actually a desire on the part of the town authorities of West Haven to find out something in re- lation to the terrible tragedy that is now a stain on the fair name of the town. I would be guilty of great exaggeration if I should report that they are determined to find out Jennie Cramer's murderer or murderers, if she was indeed murdered, but that there is a disposition to do something was shown to-day. After eight days it has been determined to have a chemical analy- sis made of the girl's internal organs, as there is excellent reason to be- lieve, as was reported two days ago, ihat there were drugs in her body when she was found dead. This is beyond question a laudable move. It would have been well to make it, even if eight weeks had elapsed, if it had not been done before. It had been supposed by the public until to-day that such an analysis had been made already, but the marvellous expert employed to make the examination says, with the utmost sang f void, that things may undoubtedly be learned by chemistry, but that he is a microscopist, not a chemist, and when he was instructed to make a thorough investigation he did not consider it his duty to cause any analysis to be made, as that was not in his line. This is the same gentleman who withholds all information about the autopsy from the city authorities of New Haven, on the ground that it is not proper for him to say anything until the coroner's jury meet again, which is on Tuesday. He thus leaves the city attorney entirely in doubt as to his dutv, but he acts according to his ideas of propriety, as he ex- presses it. The arrest of Blanche Douglass, as she is commonly called here, and the preparations made to-day by Counsellor Bollraann on behalf of the jury, are indications that, so far as they go, are accepted with satis- faction by the jury, but there is no doubt that the verdict of the people is that the Malley boys should also be taken into custody. It is argued that if a woman who is young, poor, and a fallen woman — one of the defenceless classes —is arrested, the two young men who employed her for the purpose of inveigling another young woman of respectable parentage and fair posi- tion into a night's debauch should not be allowed to go at large, not even watched closely by detectives, as is believed, simply because they are rich. EVENHANDED JUSTICE NEEDED. The Union here calls emphatically for evenhanded justice, and claims that it is not being administered. Counsellor Bollmann smiles and denies flatly that there is any dispostion on the part of the authorities to favor the Malleys. " They are here," be says, " and are not likely to run away. At least they are no more likely to run away now than they would be after an ar- rest, for the bail would not be fixed at any larger si;m than it was for Blanche Douglass, $1000, and that would be no inducement to them. They will be more likely to talk if they are free than they will be if put under arrest. We would rather not have arrested the girl if we had been certain of her appearing when she was wanted." In the meantime the week's adjournment has proved to be an ill-advised step. That some delay was perhaps wise for the purpose of allowing the public to talk over the facts and to give witnesses an opportunity to volun- teer their testimony. People do not deny but that a recess of a week should be taken, although it was undoubtedly a favor done, of course, unwittingly 25 to the murderers if the girl was murdered. It will be remembered that no testimony was elicited at the inquest in relation to the unfortunate girl's last two da}s of life — from Thursday noon until Saturday morning. Very little is known about where she was or how she spent her time. The re- pentant Magdalen who tried to shield the partners of her folly by perjury does not even yet acknowledge that she litd in sajing that she was not with Jennie Cramer after Thursday morning. Yet the one thing that has been developed since the jury's adjournement is that they were together on Thursday night. It is probable that some of the stories told by different persons about her having been seen on Friday with James Malley are mis- takes, and no one here expects that it will be proved that she was seen aHve THE MALLEY MANSION. on Friday in any public place. But that she supped at Redcliff's restaurant on Thursday night is, as already stated, perfectly established. To-day another bit of evidence is brought to light in the statement made by William Arfmann, one of the proprietors of the South End House, a reputable restaurant on the east shore half a dozen miles from the city. He says that on Thursday evening the two Malleys, accompanied by two ladies, stopped at his hotel for supper. One of the ladies was Jennie Cramer, who, together with the Malleys, was well known to Air. Arfmann. The other lady he did not know, but she answers closely to the description of Blanche Douglass. A supper for four, consisting of several courses, was ordered and partaken of. The party was jolly, and made things lively with songs and laughter. His attention was particularly called to Miss Cramer by the fact that she expressed dissatisfaction with some of the table ware, 26 and it was changed at her request. Four bottles of claret wine were order- ed and drunk by the party, though toward the last Miss Cramer protested that she would not drink any more. Notwithstanding her protest, she was urged, almost to the point ot forcing it upon her, to continue drinking. If there is no mistake about the date this story supplies an all important gap in the testimony. So far as the evidence went before the coroner's jury, there was no positive evidence as to Miss Cramer's whereabouts from Thursday noon till Saturday morning, when she was found dead. The facts above recited carry the case one step farther. It is proven that the quartet were together Wednesday night, and that the two girls breakfasted together Thursday morning. Mr. Aifmann's story brings the whole four together again Thursday night. Those stories about eating and drinking of the party have given rise to a theory of the case, which, however wide of the truth it may eventually prove to be, certainly fits all the facts known, and is the only theory yet advanced which does not contain palpable inconsis- tencies. It is conceded that the girl was extremely unlikely to have com- mitted suicide, and if she killed herself it was probably unwittingly. On the other hand there seems to be no motive apparent which would induce the Malleys to kill her, and certainly none that would induce Blanche Douglass to have any hand iij her death. Yet she died, and the testimony of one credible witness is that there was a very unusual offensive odor about her when she was found. Moreover, he (Mr. Marsden) positively says that he distinguished the smell of laudanum mingled with other strange smells. Now, on Wednesday night, at the time when Jennie Cramer is first known to have submitted herself to James Malley, Jr., there was a supper of cakes, bananas, and sauterne. The next morning she ate porterhouse steak and mushrooms and drank milk for her breakfast. It is not known what dinner she ate, but according to Arf- mann's story she ate a supper of several courses anda liberal supply of claret. Later, Thursday evening, she was in the Redcliff restaurant and drank milk. Huckleberries were also found in her stomach. Late Thurs- day evening one witness is ready to testify that he saw two women go into the Malley house. It is generally believed they were Jennie and Blanche Douglass. Little doubt exists that Jennie Cramer spent Thursday night again in company with James Malley, Jr. It is not at all unlikely, considering her experiences for two days past, that she was taken ill. It is not to be expected that the Malleys would call a physician unless they were really obliged to do so, since they would thereby expose themselves to scandal, as well as the woman, what would be more natural than they should give her doses of medicine, such as lauda- num, and what would be more natural than that she should fall into a sleep that would hst for a long time and end in death ? With a dead body on their hands under such circumstances what would the Malley boys nat- urally do ? The simple fact that two witnesses testify to a beach wagon being seen on Friday night after midnight in the very locality where the body was found on Saturday morning is a sufficient answer to this ques- tion. Of course no proof of this theory has been elicited, but it seems to be the only one that is not in any respect improbable and which is not in some way contradicted either by the testimony of witnesses or of known facts. To be sure, the testimony of Blanche Douglass contradicts it in a few particulars, but her testimony, as she is said to give it now, is certainly false in m^ny particulars. She is still trying to shield the Malleys from something, in spite of her declarations to the contrary. She is kept closely 2; by Sheriff Peck, and allowed to see nobody but her counsel, unless it is true, as generally supposed, that the counsel for the Malley bo)s is also al- lowed to see her and consult with her. Certainly she is jealously guarded from the press for some reason, and no such questions as an intelligent re- porter would put to her have been asked, so far as can be learned. It is equally impossible to obtain any statement of the Malleys, who refuse to talk to any journalist about the case. New Haven, Conn., August 15, 1881. It is now certain that the efforts of the press to arouse public officials to some sense of their responsibility in the matter of investigating the causes of Jennie Cramer's death have been at least partially successful. There seems to be little doubt that the wealth and presumed social position of the Malleys have to some extent operated to delay a move which was made this morning, and which was called for by the newspapers and the public three days ago. The Malley boys were arrested early this morning. It is true that the authorities have contended by their counsel for the last week that they had neither the right nor any reason to make such an arrest. They had said that it was not well to arrest them ; that such a move would be calculated to prevent the Malleys from telling anything that they knew in the case ; that even if it was desirable it was not possible under the law. In short, any excuse that could be thought of for not arresting two rich young men has been put forth. But public opinion was too strong, and yesterday the two boys were arrested. There is no doubt that there was ample ground for the issue of a war- rant. Aside from the fact that they committed perjury, which is now be- yond a doubt, the very facts regarding their association with the dead girl, and the story of the last days of her life, so far as it was brought out in the beginning of the inquest, were enough to direct public suspicion to them, and at least in the tribunal of public opinion, throw the onus of explain- ing the circumstances directly upon them. She was a girl devoted to pleas- ure. Whether she had preserved the purity of her person or not is a doubtful question in the minds of many who knew her well. Hawthorne compares a woman's chastity to an onion, saying that layer after layer may be removed without much apparent damage, but when the last is taken off there is nothing left. Whether or not James Malley removed the last bar- riers of her sell-respect on Wednesday night, it is sure that he induced her to break over a rule she generally observed, and to stay with him at his cousin's house overnight in company with a professional strumpet. The next morning she went home, and, being severely upbraided by her mother, left the house either in fear or in anger. That night she was again in com- pany with the two Malley boys and the woman Blanche Douglass, and, so far as is now definitely known, was never again seen alive, but on Saturday morning she was found dead on the shore. SCANDALOUS INACTIVITY. It seems as if the first move of an energetic prosecutor would have been to lock up her three companions until they had separately explained the circumstances ; but, instead of that, they were allowed to plan a scheme of perjury, by which they thought they would be able to hide the scandal. In this they failed. It has been known for a number of days that they had failed, but the same easy-going disposition that made it seem advisable to 28 wait eight days before ordering a chemical analysis of the girl's internal organs induced the authorities to put off arresting the Malleys until the > ninth day following the discovery of the body. However, they were ar- rested this morning. It was not by the motion of the coroner's jury or- the Justice of the Peace, Metcalf, who acts as coroner, but an entirely inde- pendent move made by Grand Juror Hull, of West Haven. The peculiar machinery of the law in Connecticut towns has already been spoken of in connection with this case, and it will bear a little explanation. In West Haven, or rather Orange, for West Haven is a hamlet in the town of Orange, there is a selectman, as in other towns. He is supposed to be the chief official of the town, and he has gone to Saratoga. His name is Kelsey. Then there are two grand jurors, who are not members ' of the grand jury, but are elected by the people as prosecuting attorneys. These are Messrs. Hull and Wood. Mr. Wood has taken no action in the Cramer case, but Mr. Hull has employed Lawyer Bush as counsel, and it . was on his complaint that the Malley boys were arrested. There is no such • officer under Connecticut laws as coroner, but a justice of the peace em- panels a jury of inquest in cases where death has occurred from unknown causes. This jury is supposed to inquire into the cause of the death, and write down in a verdict what they think about it. That is all they can do. Neither justice nor jury has any authority to do anything else. Then there is a deputy sheriff, one Peck, who acts as the police department of the town, and is an influential adviser of everybody in general. Everybody excepting Peck has retained counsel. There is the counsel of the coro- ner's jury, counsel of each of the prisoners, and counsel of the grand juror. The warrants for the arrest of the Malley boys were made by Justice Booth, of West Haven, on complaint of Grand Juror Hull, are just alike and read as follows : " That they ' did at said town of Orange, on the jjth day of August, r88i, with force of arms, wilfully and of malice aforethought, feloniously kill and murder Jennie Cramer, of the town of New Haven, by drowning the said Jennie Cramer, by reason of which drowning she immediately expired. Against the peace, contrary to the statute in such case provided, and of evil example.' " The warrants also recite in similar language that they administered lauda- num to said Jennie Cramer, by reason of which poison so administered she immediately expired. These warrants were placed in the hands of Deputy Sheriff Peck. He found James Malley in bed, having arrived at his house before seven o'clock. James Malley, being told that he was under arrest on a charge of murder, was greatly agitated and asked to see the warrant. This was read to him, and he was allowed to eat his breakfast. He then accompanied the officer to the house of his uncle Edward Malley, the father of Walter. Walter was found in the barn, and asked to see the warrant, and also inquired if James was under arrest. Neither man seemed sur- prised, and Walter calling a hack the party drove to Judge Blydenburgh's office, where he found his own counsel. Lawyer Fox, who went with his clients to West Haven. ARRAIGNED IN COURT. After some delay court was opened by Justice Booth, and Lawyer Bush as prosecuting attorney recited the contents of the warrants. " I ask for a continuance for one week," said he, " and I do this for several reasons. We believe we have evidence enough to warrant this arrest and we pro- 29 pose to ascertain definitely who is connected with this murder. It may be a hardship to lock these young men up, but the position they have talien and their conduct in this matter have certainly occasioned grave suspicion of their guilt." Mr. Fox said his clients desired the fullest investigation, but he thought that the State ought to go on in a day or two and not ask for a week. He believed that it could be shown that his clients were innocent of these charges and claimed to be as anxious as the officers of the State to find out the manner of Jennie Cramer's death. In this connection he referred to the reward of $1000 offered by Edward Malley for evidence that will con- vict the guilty parties, and said that detectives had been employed by the Malleys to aid the State authorities in their search. Mr. Bush replied that he could not divulge the facts which he possessed, consistently with his duty as prosecuting officer, but that he had important evidence. It was necessary for him to have sufficient time to investigate the case. Mr. Fox said that he thought the public press had urged Mr. Bush to the arrest, and Judge Blydenburgh asked Mr. Bush if he could say in good faith that he had any evidence of a crime having been committed. Mr. Bush said that he would not answer any further than he had already done, and that while he did not wish to inflict any hardship upon the young men, their conduct was very much against them, whether guilty or innocent. Judge Blydenburgh argued that the accused had a right to ask the State whether they had any evidence of crime. Unless the prose- cution could show that a murder or homicide had been committed, the pris- oners ought to be discharged. Mr. Bush refused to say anything further, and Justice Booth postponed the case for one week. No request was made that the prisoners should be admitted to bail, as their counsel admitted that it was not a bailable case, but it was asked that ihey should be placed in custody of officers and not confined in jail. Judge Blydenburgh offered in their behalf to assume any extra expense that would be incurred. Justice Booth said that the expense was not considered and Mr. Bush opposed the granting of Judge Blyden- burgh's request. After some further argument Justice Booth committed the prisoners to jail until next Monday morning at nine o'clock. They were then placed in Sheriff Peck's custody and taken in a hack to New Haven, after they had had a private interview with Blanche Douglass' counsel. IN JAIL. When the Malley boys were brought to the jail they were delivered at once to the custody of Jailer Stevens, who took their " pedigree" in the regulation manner. As they stood covered before the jailer, evidently un- used to the etiquette of the place, an officer said, " Hats off," and they doffed their headgear. Walter E. Malley said he was twenty-four years old, born in Connecticut, could read and write, was unmarried, was never in jail before and was a clerk. James Malley, Jr., said he was twenty-three years old, and gave the same answers that Walter did to all the other ques- tions. They were then searched carefully, but nothing of importance was found on them, and they were taken at once to their cells. The bearing of the two men from the time they were first arrested differed in a marked degree. Walter Malley was cool and seemed unconcerned and even amused at some things which happened ; but James was considerably agitated. 30 The mortification of his position was evidently very painful. Even after he was in his cell he refused to say anything to the reporters or to the jailer. Walter Malley, however, talked a little to the reporters for the first time in days. He said that he was satisfied, and that the arrest ought to have been made long ago. " I'm afraid it is too late now," he said enigmatically. To a jail official he said : " I feel all right and I guess I can stand this. I hope they will make a thorough investigation. 1 have nothing to fear. I can account for all my time that Friday night. Neither of us has any knowledge of how the girl met her death, and the more thorough the inves- tigation the more plainly this will appear." " But how do you know but that James" — " I am convinced that he knows no more about the matter than I do." " You know public opinion is strongly against you," said Mr. Stevens, " and nothing but a complete investigation will satisfy the people." " I know that," Walter answered, " and I am satisfied," adding with a smile, " but after it is over some one will have to pay for this." " I wouldn't talk that way till it is all over," the jailer said. They asked if they could have better quarters than the ordinary cells, and were told they could not, and that they could not smoke, but that they could have what they liked to eat if they chose to buy it. They then set- tled themselves in their cells, each with one of Scott's novels, which Wal- ter had brought from home. NEW EVIDENCE. Mr. Bush, the prosecuting attorney in fact, said to the Jlerald corrt- spondent that he certainly had newly discovered evidence, and that it had been found in part from Blanche Douglass' talk with Sheriff Peck since her imprisonment. What the nature of the evidence was he utterly and dis- tinctly refused to tell, nor would he allow the correspondent to talk with the girl. As the matter is now managed nobody has access to her excepting her counsel, and through him the Malley boys and their counsel, who have been constantly in consultation with Judge Blydenburgh for the past week. This course of action on the part of the authorities has been keenly criti- cised. No reason has been advanced, aside from the girl's own wish, why she should not be locked up. It is certain that she perjured herself, and equally certain that she still lies in her statements regarding the way in which she spent the time on Thursday and Friday. There is certainly nothing in her conduct which calls for any special indulgence, and it is difficult to believe that she would be favored as she is if she were not young and pretty. Mr. Bush says that he is restrained by professional courtesy from talking with her, yet her counsel is also de facto of counsel for the Malley boys. There seems to have been nothing done, excepting the bare fact of the arrests, which has not been directly or indirectly an assistance to the defence. THE AUTOPSY. In regard to the autopsy, the delay has been, to say the least, unfortu- nate. While there is now no doubt that a thorough examination will be made, there is no reason why it should not have been done a week sooner. Dr. Painter says — and he is a member of the coroner's jury — that the delay was because the jury did not feel like incurring the expense of an examina- tion. To employ a single expert costs them $25 a day, and they believed 31 that the State would only allow $30 for an autopsy. They did authorize the expert tu go down to New York and work one day, knowing that he could determine at least one point by looking for a certain fluid. This fluid was not found and that, Dr. Painter says, is all that has been done. The remains have been carefully preserved and will doubtless be in fair condi- tion for the chemical examination that is now to be made by Professor Chittenden of the Sheffield Scientific School. Mr. Bush says that the authorities are satisfied that the girl's death did not result from drowning. They are also satisfied that the trace of poisonous drugs will be found by the chemical analysis. 1 send you the statement of Juryman Marsden, upon which this conviction rests. Beyond these two facts nothing of im- portance seems to have been found out by the coroner's jury. The con- tradictions of the testimony given before that jury have been discovered by outside workers. If the testimony that Mr. Bush says he now has shall prove to be as important as some that the press has discovered, the case against the two accused is likely to be a strong one. As to the many stories that are extant about Jennie Cramer having been seen on the Thursday and Friday immediately preceding her death, it is now likely that some of them will be substantiated by reliable testimony before the coroner's jury. It is almost impossible to learn things here that would easily be found out in New York. There seems to be an official pride in reticence and a system of legal machinery which gives every one the opportunity to plead etiquette as a reason for not answering simple questions. It can be readily understood why the Malleys, with the suspicion of murder resting upon them, should refuse to talk, and even why Blanche Douglass, who is still holding back facts that she unquestionably knows, should refuse to see re- porters. There is no doubt that a clever reporter used to criminal work in a great city could elicit facts in an informal talk with her that would be of immense importance to the prosecution, even if he did not arrive at the whole truth, but the officials of West Haven are too unused to handling serious questions to accomplish tMs result themselves, and they refuse to allow the privilege (o others. Common rumor and gossip have been relied upon to develop testimony. Counsellor Bollman has said in so many words that the jury relied upon this when they adjourned for a week. It is somewhat singular that no more facts have been developed in this way, seeing that the Malley boys and Jennie Cramer are so well known about town, but enough has been proved to show that they were together on Thursday night, and there is now no doubt, according to the statements of those who have been working in the case, that witnesses will be ready to prove that they were together on Friday night. If this is so, and the au- thorities are confident about i(, there can belittle question that the Mal- leys are able-to tell enough about the unfortunate girl's movements to rob the case of all its mystery. If they knew her condition and whereabouts on Friday evening, it will not be hard to construct a theory, at least, of the girl's death which will leave no doubt in the minds of any as to its sound- ness. The theory in the Herald \.\i\s morning is the first one advanced in which all the circumstances are considered. It is copied in the papers heie to-day and has attracted attention from all the officials, who, without exception, declare it to be the most plausible of any theory advanced. Hardly any one here believes that Jennie Cramer committed suicide ; still less is it thought that the Malleys intentionally killed her. No motive for such a crime has been suggested, neither does it seem possible that Blanche Douglass could have had even a wish to put Jennie out of the way, and uo 32 other person is supposed to have been with her. That hers was an acci- dental death seems most probable, although it is also very probable that it was produced by unlawful means. No one is willing to commit himself to a real belief in any theory. The excitement in New Haven in regard to the case increases daily. New Haven, August 16, 1881. The proceedings to-day in the Cramer mystery have been at once excit- ing and unsatisfactory. The excitement in the town is fairly at red heat. Out of town papers that have given attention to the case are sold almost before the carriers can get them to the centre of the city, and the local papers are Hterally unable to print enough copies to satisfy the demand for them. The feeling of curiosity as to the details of the story that cannot yet be told in full is stronger even than the interest in the president's condition. The newsboys between their hours of selling the morning and evening papers drive an excellent trade in selling the unhappy girl's pictures and the details of the case. Even those which are unsavory in the extreme are talked over with the utmost freedom everywhere. No substantial advance in the case has been made to-day, the develop- ments expected at the meeting of the jury of inquest having been de- ferred, probably by agreement of counsel, in consequence of the arrests made in the last three days. As has been explained, the proceedings of this jury have no legal force whatever, and the prosecuting authorities do not now depend upon them for developing facts. The arrests have been made in consequence of evidence (it is claimed) which has been obtained independently of the inquest. What this evidence is is very doubtful. Prosecuting Attorney Bush claims that he has discovered important facts, some of which have been learned from Blanche Douglass. Where any other facts have come from he refuses to say. As a matter of fact it is believed that little has been. learned excepting from the girl's self-contradictions and the clews which she has given, wittingly or unwittingly, and the authorities positively refuse to allow any reporters to talk with her. It is now a matter of sworn testimony that on the night after Jennie Cramer was lost forever to her home and her parents she was in Redcliff's restaurant with Walter Malley and the abandoned woman he had visiting him at his father's house. It is also asserted on every hand that she was at the West Shore on Friday night (the night she died) in company with James Malley. Whether this will be proved by competent testimony or not I am unable to say, as I have investigated half a dozen stories to that effect without finding any positive statement that seemed worthy of notice. It would be impossible to deny it, however, without seeing everybody who was there that night, and, as it is claimed by the authorities that they can prove it, it may be shown. On Friday afternoon, however, she was in James Malley's company in New Haven, beyond any reasonable doubt, as is shown by the evidence below. THE JURY OF INQUEST. The only ofificial proceedings of the day were those of the jury of in- quest, which met in Thompson's Hall, in West Haven, this morning. The hour for meeting had been fixed at nine a.m., but as only a week had elapsed since the former session, nobody had determined, apparently, what was to be done. So, although everybody who was likely to be present was on hand promptly, an hour was consumed in consultations between counsel held on the corners of the country roads, and the audience which filled the 33 little hall to overflowing sat patiently talking over the tragedy and looking at some pictures of the dead girl, which were handed from one to another. L have already explained that the proceedings of the jury of inquest are not regarded as of much importance. This jury is the nearest approach to a coroner's jury that is known under Connecticut law, but as it has no power to commit any one or to do any- thing more than write down an opinion on paper and call it a verdict, it only serves to give color to subsequent proceedings. As proceedings have already been begun by the prosecuting authorities, by the arrest of Blanche Douglass and the Malley boys, the object of any further action by the jury of inquest does not appear. The proceedings began at ten o'clock by the swearing of Charles Raw- lings, the manager of Redcliff's restaurant, in New Haven. He testified that he was in the restaurant on the morning and evening of August 4th, tlie Thursday preceding Jennie Cramer's death ; he saw two young girls REDCLIFFE S SALOON. breakfast in the restaurant that morning ; they had been in the restaurant frequently before, but knew them only by sight ; he thought they were both in light dresses on that occasion ; they were waited on by John Henry, a colored waiter, and had a double porterhouse steak, mushrooms, and three glasses of milk. He identified the check paid, which was produced in court, and testified that Blanche Douglass wrote the order for the breakfast on the blank check ; he had given all the checks for the day's business to Counsellor Bollman, who brought them to court ; he (witness) saw Blanche Douglass again about half-past ten p.m. ; Walter Malley was with her, and a lady who, he thought, was the same one who was with her in the morning ; her dress was the same, and he was tolerably sure that it was the same lady ; he did not scan her features, but he saw Walter Malley enter with two ladies ; he believed they were the same two who were there in the morning ; he would not swear positively to the second one (Jennie Cramer), but he knew that one was Miss Douglass ; he did not see James Malley, Jr., that evening ; he did not come in or go out with the party. • , 34 SEEING THE WITNESSES PROMPTLY. After he gave the checks to the counsel James and Walter Malley called at the restaurant ; he could not say positively when it was, but after the newspapers had published the fact that he remembered the party who came in the evening Walter Malley called on him and tried to convince him that he was mistaken in his recollection, and that he and James and Blanche Douglass constituted the party. That evening James Malley called with Walter and Mr. Fox (their lawyer), and another gentleman called, and James tried to convince him that he was mistaken, but he could not be convinced, being positive that he remembered aright ; in the evening the party ate lamb chops, fried potatoes, and drank six glasses of milk ; they were the last customers, and went out at thirteen minutes past eleven p.m.; the witness had no doubt that the second lady was the one who was with, Miss Douglass in the morning until he heard it contradicted, but as it had been contradicted he could not swear positively to her identity. John W. Henry, the waiter, was next sworn. He had been a waiter, he testified, in Redcli£E's restaurant for about four weeks ; he waited on the two girls in the morning ; he could not remember seeing them before that ; he could not say positively that he saw the same two ladies together again ; the last party that came in on Thursday, August 4th, consisted of two ladies and one gentleman ; he was " not in the habit of gazing at ladies' apparel" and could not say how these two were dressed ; he did not know any of the parties personally, being comparatively a stranger in the town, but he iden- tified the same order or check that Rawlings had identified ; he did not notice the time, but the party was the last in the restaurant that evening ; the taller of the two Malleys (Walter) had called since then and tried to re- call to his mind that he (the witness) had stepped on his hat, it being on the floor ; witness could not remember any such thing, as gentlemen were in the habit often of throwing their hats on the floor, and he often stepped on them accidentally, and then picked them up, and told the gentlemen that there were plenty of chairs to put them on ; Malley said, " My God, that point must be sustained or I am a ruined man !" Later, the other Malley called on him, and tried to recall to his mind the circumstance of the hat, but he could not remember any such circumstance ; witness said probably he was mistaken, but he did not think he was ; was positive that the party of the restaurant in the evening was composed of two ladies and one gentleman. JENNIE CRAMER SEEN ON THE STREET. William Twining, of New Haven, testified that he stood at the comer of Whitney Avenue and Trumbull Street, on Friday afternoon, August 5th, early in the afternoon, he thought before three o'clock ; he knew Jennie Cramer ; had known her, he thought, for eight years ; was in the habit of buying stuff in her father's store and she had waited on him ; and she was in the habit of calling on his " folks ;" he saw her near the end of Temple Street, near where he stood ; a gentleman was with her ; he wore a white straw hat, with a polka dot band ; the couple were walking toward Whitney- ville ; he was thirty or forty yards away from them ; was positive the girl was Jennie Cramer ; was certain of the day as it was the day that George Audley was moving some trunks ; he did not know the Malleys ; Jennie Cramer had a white dress on George T. Audley testified that he knew James Malley, Jr.; had known him eight or nine years ; was a classmate of his at school, and had seen him often since ; probably once a w^eek ; saw 35 him on Friday, August 5th, in the afternoon, about three o'clock ; witness was sitting in front of his father's livery stable, near where Twining was sitting ; Malley was on Trumbull Street, near Whitney Avenue ; a young lady was with him, but witness did not know her ; she had on a round hat with a broad brim ; he could not describe her dress, but noticed that she had four rings on ; the couple passed from five to eight feet from where he sat on the wagon, having just driven up. Mr. James Cramer, the father of the girl, was next sworn. He testified that his daughter was twenty years old ; she always had lived at home ; he had never had occasion to strike his daughter for five years past, or punish her in any similar way ; he never severely punished her ; perhaps he had slapped her for some trifling offence when she was a school girl ; never threatened her with severe punishment ; never said anything that would lead her to fear such punishment ; never knew her to be afraid of anything more than a scolding ; she had always been treated very well, very kindly ; she was not in good health and was rather spoiled on that account. Witness had been ill for five years and had left the family management to his wife ; he knew that notes came for her from the Malleys, but never knew Malley to call at his house and knew nothing of the contents of the notes ; the last time he ever saw her alive was on Wednesday afternoon, when she went to the depot with her sister and another young girl ; he knew that Jennie was out all Wednesday night, for his wife sat up all night looking for her ; he made no threats ; his wife may have said that if Jennie carried on like that she would have no home, and he may have said that was right, but he would have received her, of course, if she had come back and never said anything different ; she was always at home before that Wednesday night excepting when she had been out of town on a visit ; she had been to New York on visits ; on Thursday he went to the Elliott House to look for his daughter, as his wife thought she might be there with Miss Douglass; the clerk told him that a young girl was there with Miss Douglass, and he sent a porter upstairs fur her ; the porter came down with word from Miss Douglass that Jennie had gone out and had started for New York to see her brother. THE mother's story. Mrs. Cramer, Jennie's mother, then testified that she did not remember that Mr. Cramer had ever touched his daughter or threatened to do so ; certainly he never dragged her about by the hair or threatened ; the girl was always humored and had her own way as she was not very healthy ; neither the witness nor her husband ever made any threats ; on Thursday | morning Mr. Cramer said when he learned that Jennie had been out over- night, " Then she is lost for us ;" but she had no intention of refusing to receive her and she thought her husband had none ; when Jennie came in on Thursday morning witness said, " Why didn't you come home ?" She replied, " I couldn't come home ; they wouldn't let me." Witness said, " You could have come if you wanted to ; it is not the first time the Malleys have tried to keep you out ;" a week before that, she added, they tried to keep her out and she came back at four o'clock in the morning ; she said again, " 1 couldn't come," and I said, " Don't you know that you are disgracing yourself and disgracing your parents by staying out over- night ? If the neighbors knew it you would lose your good name." She said she did not think the neighbors knew it, and I told her I thought they did know it. I was very much excited and I cried. I asked her why she did not keep her promise. She had agreed not to go out again with that 36 party, as they had tried a week before to keep her out overnight. She said nothing to this. Miss Douglass then said that she wanted to have Jennie stay with her at the Elliott House ; I told her that she had no right to keep Jennie ; that it did not look well for a respectable young girl to stay out overnight ; Miss Douglass said that there were no gentlemen coming to the hotel ; I told her that she needn't say that, for it was known all over the United States that a gentleman can go to a hotel with a lady whenever he likes ; I said to Jennie, " If you go on that way staying out overnight it will never do for you to come home ; if you carry on like that we must find a place for you to stay when your little sister comes home ; we can't have you here;" I was crying and was very much excited ; I said, "James Malley has no right to keep you out, and if he does he will hear from your father and from me ;" she said nothing, and I left the room ; I did not mean really that she must leave the house ; I could not get along without her nor she without me, and she knew I didn't mean it. I know that James Malley has been at my house, but I did not see him when he came ; on Thursday I called at the Malleys' store between five and six o'clock in the afternoon ; I told James Malley then that he had got Jennie into bad company ; 1 meant Miss Douglass ; he said it was good company ; Miss Douglass was a perfect lady ; I asked him to see her home that evening, and he said he did not know about that, as they had made an engagement to go to the shore that night ; I asked him why he had kept her out overnight, and he said she had stopped with Miss Doug- lass at the Elliott House. He said he thought she was all right at home when I called on him. This was on Thursday afternoon. He promised that he would either come himself or bring Jennie, or send a message. No message came until Friday. (This message is supposed to have been a verbal one — " All right" — which James Malley sent by a boy on Friday, and which the parents then understood to mean that Jennie was all right.) Jennie was very lively (continued the witness), and was always sing- ing around the house. I do not believe she would commit suicide. She had been under the doctor's care for two years, but for the last four years she had not been doctoring at all. At this point the jury took a recess for the purpose of consulting as to whether they desired to continue their investigation or to adjourn. After a little time Justice Metcalf returned to the hall and said that the jury had adjourned subject to the call of the coroner, and that no further proceed- ings would be taken to-day. ORANGE OFFERS A REWARD. The town meeting of the township of Orange, in which the borough of West Haven is located, was held in the afternoon, pursuant to the call of which I wrote some days ago. Only about twenty voters were present, and the business to be transacted was fully understood beforehand. Accord- ingly a motion was at once made that a reward be offered for the convic- tion of the murderers of Jennie Cramer. Mr. Thompson moved that the reward be of $1000, and a more thrifty voter moved as an amendment that it be $500. After considerable discussion the following resolution was passed : " Voted^ That the freemen of the town of Orange do hereby authorize the Selectmen of Orange to offer a reward of $1000 to be paid to the per- 37 son or persons who furnish evidence that shall secure the conviction of the party or persons who murdered Miss Jennie E. Cramer, whose body was found on West Haven shore, on the morning of August 6, 1881. Said reward to be paid upon the conviction of the guilty parties." If it shall prove, as seems now most probable, that the killing of Jennie Cramer was manslaughter and not murder, the town will by the wording of this resolution be able to save its money ; and that this is a desideratum with the Orange citizens they have already declared by their words and their acts. Lawyer Bush, who seems to be overpowered by the weight of the facts he claims to know, says that he is not desirous of having any more facts brought out before the jury of inquest, and that he is doubtful if he will try to develop anything at the examination of Blanche Douglass for perjury on Thursday. It is evident enough that he is not yet ready to proceed with the case in the charge of murder, and he says he did not care to let the defence know what his case is. He has forbidden the Deputy Sheriff to allow anybody to see Blanche Douglass excepting her counsel and such public officials as have a right to see her, and refuses to give any inkling of the course he is likely to pursue. He advises against examining Dr. Prudden, and from what has been shown concerning that expert's work it is not thought that anything is lost to the world in that way. The exami- nation of the girl's remains, however, is going on at last. Professor Rus- sel H. Chittenden, of the Sheffield Scientific School, has received them, and reported to-day that he had begun his work. He was reluctant to say anything regarding it, but in reply to direct questions he said that it might take several weeks for him to conclude his investigations. At present he could give no definite idea of when he would be able to report to the jury. He had been instructed to make a complete and exhaustive examination, and would do so. If arsenic has been administered (it is said that traces of arsenic were found by the microscope) it could be shown in three days, but if chloroform or opium were administered it would take longer. At the jail, where the Malley boys are confined, nothing of importance has occurred. They have signified their wish to see no one excepting their relations and no one else has been admitted to see them. New Haven, Conn., August 17 — 12.30 a.m. To-night a secret session of the jury of inquest is being held at Sheriff Peck's house, in West Haven. It was deemed advisable to see what new story could be elicited from Blanche Douglass, and for this purpose she was again subjected to examination in the presence of the jury. With the utmost readiness she obliged her investigators with a story entirely different in every respect from her original one, and from the several confessions which she had afterward made when she was protesting mightily she was determined to tell the truth. Her latest story, as told to-night, is one that certainly puts a blacker look on the whole mystery than any previous explanation has done. She says that on the Friday night, when Jennie Cramer died, she (the witness) was with Walter Malley in a room over Redcliff' s restaurant. There are furnished rooms in that building, which it is said are kept by some of the Malleys and occupied occasionally, but the girl's previous story that she was in the Malley mansion on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday nights has been so corroborated by other witnesses of a less fanciful turn of mind 38 that there is little doubt of its truth. However, this latest confession as it filters out through the closed doors of the jury room, is to the effect that while she was thus engaged on Friday night, James Malley, Jr., came up- stairs from the street dragging Jennie Cramer with him. She was pleading and crying, and making such shrieks and outcry that Walter Malley left the room and went out to stop the disturbance. He was unable to do this, and after making the effort, he called Blanche Douglass to his assist- ance. She managed to quiet things somewhat, and Jennie retired with James Malley, Jr. The story thus melodramatically begun is left in this unfinished state for to-night. The jurymen, one and all, refuse to say anything more, and the girl cannot be seen. It is probable by to-morrow, when the jury have been able to think about the story awhile and somebody else shall have extorted still another story from the girl, they will see how worthless her testimony is. At present they are as much excited about it as the whole town was a few hours ago over a story that was circulated to the effect that James Mal- ley, Jr., had shot himself in his cell. Of course he had not, but the story was believed for a time by almost everybody who heard it, for the town is growing wild with excitement over the affair. New Haven, Conn., August 17, i88r. The excitement in the Cramer case has been heightened to-day by the prevalence of rumors. As a matter of fact, there have been rumors with- out number ever since the discovery of the remains on the West Shore beach, but there has been to-day a new occasion for the starting of stories in the proceedings of the jury of inquest last night, of which a brief account is in this morning's Herald. As we said in that account the session of the jury was a secret one, held in Sheriff Peck's house, where Blanche Doug- lass has been confined for some days. At this session the girl was exam- ined at length, having signified her intention once more to tell the truth. The arrival in New Haven yesterday of a New York bartender, who was not ashamed to speak of his relations with the woman in the case whose reputation has been so definitely fixed, has been made the subject of talk ad nauseam, and the influence he is said to have been able to exert on the woman has been defined with great nicety. Neither has it escaped com- ment that she herself was discovered on her knees and overheard saying a prayer — circumstance strange enough, doubtless, and laudable enough, but hardly to be considered as of thrilling interest to the public. A letter written to the woman by one of her associates in New York has also been printed in full, and is supposed to have aided in the development of the case by inducing Blanche Douglass to make one more effort to tell the truth. Whether it was the power of prayer, the epistle from the inmate of the disreputable house, the pleadings of the bartender, or the fear of the penitentiary as a penalty for perjury that brought out the story, it is cer- tain that one has come. Undoubtedly the interest thus shown in all the details of the actions of this woman springs from a genuine desire to arrive at a solution attending Jennie Cramer's death, but it has grown into a strong appetite for facts that seem unworthy of notice, considering the character and position in the case of Blanche Douglass. That a story was told to the jury last night is certain. The sitting continued until half-past one o'clock this morn- ing, and the girl was questioned by the jury, by Justice Metcalf, by Law- yer Bollroan, the counsel for the jury, and by Lawyer Bush, the real prose- 39 cuting attorney, until she had satisfied them that she had told all she knew about Jennie Cramer and a'bout the last few days of her life. Juryman Painter, who has worked as hard as man could in the case, while he re- fused point blank to tell anything about what she had said, declared that he believed she had told the whole truth substantially. He argued that her perjury when she was on the stand the first time was natural, as she said herself she was in the employ of the Malleys, and she was obliged to do what she could to shield them. She afterward, he continued, determined to cut loose from the influence of the Malleys, had discharged her counsel. Judge Blydenburgh, who is also counsel for the Malleys, and had thrown „ herself on the State for protection — turning State's evidence. New Haven, August i8, 1881. The proceedings to-day of the authorities of West Haven in the investi- gation of the cause of Jennie Cramer's death, or, as it is called locally, the "Cramer Murder Case," were to have begun with the examination of Blanche Douglass on the charge of perjury. This examination, for some secret reason was postponed for one week. The next proceeding — and this proved really important — was the adjourned session of the jury of in- quest. The session was appointed for two p.m., and before that hour the little hall in which the jury meets was filled with curious spectators. Sev- eral of these were ladies, some of whom came from New Haven, and, singu- larly enough, many were old men. Counsellor Bollman conducted the investigation, which resulted in developing very important testimony. Jus- tice Metcalf and the jury sat listening quietly, the justice saying nothing, except for the purpose of quelling laughter or keeping order, and the jury only asking an occasional question. The testimony, which was consider- ably more in volume than had been expected, was also considerably more interesting. HEARING WITNESSES. Frank Keenan, a hack driver of New Haven, was the first witness. He testified that he knew Jennie Cramer, and had known her about a year. Being asked to tell when he last saw her alive, he said it was about the time the Boston train comes in. Explaining further, he said that it was about twenty-five minutes past three p.m. on the day before she was found (meaning August 5th) ; he was at the New Haven depot, on the sidewalk, and having his attention drawn to a horse car that had just come from the centre of the city and which was going toward West Haven, he looked at it and saw Jennie Cramer sitting on the forward end of one of the seats ; some driver near him asked who that girl with a light suit on was, and he replied, "It is the Cramer girl down in Grand Street ;" he thought it was Mr. Keefe he was talking to ; Keefe is a hack driver ; he fixed the day _Jjy having heard of the finding of the body the next day ; he was standing at the ladies' entrance to the depot and the car was in front of the depot, and far away ; he could not say whether she was with anybody or not, or whether a lady or gentleman sat next her, or whether she was talking or laughing with any one ; all in the car seemed to be laughing, as the car had just been jostled by a stone. Joseph W. Brunt, a clerk in the wholesale department of Edward Mal- ley's dry goods store, testified that he was Walter Malley's first cousin, and that he was in the store on the afternoon of Friday, August 5th, and that between half-past five and a quarter to six that afternoon James Malley, 40 Jr., asked him to go out driving to the shore with him after the store closed ; witness had been out driving with the Malleys some five weeks before; he refused the invitation just spoken of, saying that he had an engagement that he could not break ; James Malley asked him if he could not put off his engagement, and he replied that he could not ; James' prop- osition was that they should go to Buell's hotel ; after he declined James turned away and went downstairs ; at his boarding house the next morning witness had said that he was glad he had not gone with James, as if he had gone he would have " got into this thing" himself ; James had said noth- ing about going to Savin Rock ; witness was late at supper this evening at his boarding house, but he said nothing about his invitation until the next morning ; made the remark about being glad because he thought that if he had gone his name would have been concerned in the case in some way ; in the absence of Edward Malley, James Malley, Sr., had charge of the store ; witness did not know whether James Malley took precedence in the management over Walter Malley, but he knew that the latter had charge of his father's real estate business ; he did not know that James Malley, Jr., had any special privileges in the store ; witness was not at the West Shore on Saturday last, and had heard Michael Malley say nothing about being there ; he did not know Jennie Cramer, and did not know that he had ever seen her ; when he first heard of the tragedy it was at about ten o'clock in the morning, and he heard at the same time that the" Malley boys" were in some way connected with the case. At this point the witness failed to ex- actly understand a question that was put, and was subjected to a somewhat roundabout course of questioning by Counsellor Bollman, and at length explained his meaning as it is given above. He was clear and positive in his statement and was not the least confused by his examination. James Malley, he said, had not mentioned any other place as that to which they should go, and had not mentioned that any one else would go on the ride, but got the impression that James Malley meant that they two should go alone. The reason the witness had said that he was glad that he did not go driving was that he heard that James had been going with Jennie Cramer ; he did not hear this until after he heard that the body had been found ; he had known nothing about James going with Jennie Cramer until he had heard the stories connected with the tragedy, and even then knew nothing about Jennie Cramer excepting what he had learned from the stories of the tragedy. " Has there been any change in your salary lately ?" asked Mr. Bollman. " No, indeed,'" said the witness, laughing, " I wish there had been." " Was James very tired when you saw him ?" "No." ' ' Was there any reason why he should have been particularly tired ?' ' " No, unless he went at extra work in the evening." This was undoubtedly in reference to an interview with James Malley, Sr., which was published in the New Haven Courier some time ago, in which that gentleman is reported to have said that his son James was at home on the Friday evening in question and was particularly tired ; that he spent the early part of the evening with his family and took a bath and went to bed at eight o'clock. Brady's testimony. Benjamin F. Brady, the next witness, claims to be a nephew of the New York lawyer, James T. Brady, and who is employed by Charles Ball to attend 41 a small tent in Railroad Grove, the little pleasure ground near where Jennie Cramer's body was found. In the tent is carried on a £;ame similar to that which has recently become popular on Coney Island and at walking watches. It is a simple game, and consists of throwing base balls at a row of dolls at the other end of a short alley. Mr. Brady has an enormous mustache, the ends of which were carefully waxed. He has also a pronounced brogue. He had previously to his appearance to-day denied that his name was " Ben" or that he knew anything about Jennie Cramer being in Railroad Grove on the night of Friday, August 5 th. He testified to-day that he saw the body of Jennie Cramer on the morn- ing of Saturday, August 6th, and identified it at once as that of a young girl who had stopped in front of the tent in which he was employed. She was with another " lady," and stopped and asked, " What is this ?" " She came," said the witness, " as many ladies do, and asked about the game, and I explained it to her." " Which girl was it that did the talking ?" " The girl I saw drowned on the shore. After I explained that we allowed three balls to be thrown for five cents, they asked about the coon's head on the chimney." " What's that ?" asked a juryman. " It's a coon's head. We allow balls to be thrown at that." When the laughter that was caused by this had somewhat subsided Jus- tice Metcalf solemnly requested that it cease, and it did. " I soon saw that I couldn't make anything out of her," continued the witness, " and I turned away." Then there was more laughter, and the wit- ness started into a further explanation of the kind of balls that were used in his employer's game. He was cut short in this, and the audience thnt was beginning to enjoy itself greatly was brought to order by the grave jus- tice who rose to his feet (he is over six feet high) and said, " Gentlemen must not smoke in the court-room. Those who wish to smoke can go out doors." About one half the audience took cigars out of their mouths and busi- ness proceeded. "I couldn't say exactly what time it was," said the witness, " but it was about fifteen or twenty minutes before eight o'clock. The girls stood in front of the tent about five minutes." " How did you identify the girl who talked with you as the one whose body you saw ?" asked Lawyer Bollman. "I knowed her by her dress, " said the witness ; "she had on alight dress, cut short at the top, and she had glass beads on her neck and in her hair ; then she had on some mittens that didn't come down far enough to cover her rings.'' " What kind of mittens ? '* They were knit mittens ; I noticed her hand because she pointed around a good deal with it when she was talking ; when they left my place they went on toward the flying horses and then toward the swings ; that is the last I saw of them till the next morning." " Have you any doubt about the giil you saw being the same one whose body you saw next morning ?" " No," said the witness decidedly. ' The next person that came along, about fifteen minutes later, was a gentleman ; he stood in front of the tent and leaned back on his cane, and I explained the game to him. (Then the witness explained the game again to the patient jury.) He didn't speak till I g')t all through, and then he walked away toward the flying horses ; he 42 was a kind of round-featured, good-looking sort of man, with a little mus- tache, about twenty-three to twenty- five years old ; I would know him again." " Can't you describe him better ?" asked a juryman. " He was a kind of thick-set, close-built man." " What did he say to you ?" " He never said nothing. That's what made me mad. He went in the same direction the girls did." " Did you ever see him again ?" " Yes, he came to the tent about two days afterward alone ; there was a number of men there ; Lawyer Hayes was there and Keefe, the constable, and others ; Keefe asked me if I knew that New York drummer, and I look- ed and saw the man ; I says, ' How do you do ? come over here,' and put out my hand, and he came over and put out his hand, and we shook ; then I turned to Charley Ball, and says, ' Why, that's the m^n that came next after these two girls ;' Charley asked me if I didn't know who it was, and I said no, and he said, ' Why, that's Malley.' " " Do you know the Malleys ?" asked Mr, Bollmann. " No." " Have you seen them since ?" "No." " What time was it ?" " About eight o'clock." " Then how did you see the girls ?" " I have eight torches burning around the tent, so there was no difficulty in seeing features." " How came you to notice the girls ?" " Well, I like to look at pretty women better than I do homely ones." The witness then said he had never been asked to tell any different story. CORROBORATING BRADY. Harry Dorsey, a boy who tends the same game with Brady, testified that he saw the same two girls that Brady saw. Jennie Cramer, he said, wore a very light dress and mittens — (the witness meant lace mitts). " I remember particularly the rings she wore," he continued ; " one of them had some- thing dangling that was hitched to it ; I saw the girls afterward riding the flying horses, and I thought 1 recognized them by their dress ; then after- ward I saw the two coming from the swings, and again I thought I recog- nized them by their dress as the same who had come to our tent ; next morning I saw the body ; I didn't recognize it at first ; I looked closely and thought the face looked familiar, but I couldn't place it ; afterward I saw her hand with the rings on it, and then I remembered the face ; I saw no gentleman with the two girls ; I couldn't swear positively that the girls I saw at the flying horses and the swings were the same two that came down to our tent, but I thought so." Charles Maltby, a New Haven clerk, testified that he knew Jennie Cra- mer ; he was on the West Shore on Friday evening, August 5th, and met her there, on the path between the Sea View House and the grove ; she was walking from the grove ; it was about eight or half-past eight o'clock ; there was a gentleman on one side of her and a lady on the other ; I didn't know either of them ; I do not remember how any of them were dressed : I was within four or five feet of them as they passed, and I know it was 43 Jennie Cramer that I saw ; it was dusk but there was light enough to see them plainly and distinguish her features." " Did anything special serve to fix the occurrence in your mind ?" asked Mr. Bollmann. "Well, ] expected a bow from her; I have known her for about two years, for she was round the centre of the town the most of the time and I saw her a great deal, but I hadn't known her to speak to her but a very short time ; I thought she would bow, but she only looked at me and after one glance looked away ; she did not turn her head away, only her eyes." Joseph Marvin, who works on the flying horses, testified that he knew Jennie Cramer : he saw her body on Saturday morning, August 6th, and ■was positive that she rode on the flying horses in Railroad Grove the night before about eight o'clock ; perhaps it was a little later. Being asked how she was dressed he said she had on an " open lightish dress ;" another girl was with her, sitting on a horse behind her, and a gentleman, also with her, sat on a horse beside her ; he did not know the man, but described him as being of medium size ; after riding on the horses the party walked over toward the swing, where there was another party of two women and one man, and the witness thought they joined this party. " Describe the man you saw," said a juror. " Well, he was a slimish man of medium size, with a light mustache, and he wore a white straw hat ; I don't remember what kind of a band there was on the hat." This is in reference to the fact that the Malley boys both wear white straw hats with blue bands, the bands with white polka dots ; and a great deal has been said about such hats in the rumors with which the air has been laden for two weeks. " I heard nothing of any conversation between the parties on the flying horses," continued the witness. " Since then the two Malleys have been pointed out to me, and I thought one of them looked like the man in that party, but I couldn't say he was the one." Mr. Bollman then put several questions to the witness of a kind that would be termed leading in a New York court room, trying to extort from the witness the statement that he thought one of the Malleys was the man in the party of three, but the witness would say no more than that he looked like the man. He saw no peculiar actions on the part of any of the three, and no indication that any of them had been drinking. Howard C. Payne, who keeps a bowling alley and a beer saloon near the West Shore, testified that he knew Jennie Cramer by sight, but that he did not know her name particularly well until after she died ; he also knew one of the Malleys by sight and knew the other to speak to, but did not know which one that was. It turned out that the one he knew by sight was Edward Malley, the father of Walter ; the one he knew by sight was in his place on the eventful Friday night and drank a glass of beer and took one out to a friend. Witness thought the friend was a gentleman, but was not sure. Charles Ball, Brady's employer, denied that he had said that the man referred to by Constable Keefe as the New York drummer was one of the Malleys ; he had said, " Why, it must be one of the Malleys," and he had said this on account of what had been said in connection with the case, not because he knew Malley ; he did not know as a matter of fact whether it was Malley or not. James 1. Haye^ a New Haven lawyer, testified next that he was not 44 present at any such scene as Brady had described ; it was true that he had spoken of the correspondent of the New York Sun as a New York drum- mer, but that was to assist him in getting the news, and was not intended as a reflection on that gentleman. This left Brady's testimony in a badly damaged and mixed condition, but on private inquiry outside the court room it was proved that the drum- mer incident did occur, but on a different occasion from the one when Mr. Hayes was present. HIGHLY IMPORTANT STATEMENTS. The next witness proved to be the most interesting one of the day, and his testimony was beyond a question a surprise to most of those who heard it. For although it had been generally supposed for two or three days or longer that it would be proved that Jennie Cramer and James Malley were at the West Shore together on the Friday night of the story, yet the testi- mony that had been obtained, although some of it was positive enough, was hardly convincing. John J. Gilchrist, who keeps a livery stable on the West Shore, was, however positive enough and clear enough to satisfy everybody that unless his testimony shall be impeached there is no longer room for doubt that the whole quartet were together on the Friday night near where Jennie Cramer's body was found next morning. He testified that he had known Jennie Cramer well for a long time, having lived in the same street with her, and having often spoken to her ; he also knew James Malley, Jr., having worked for his uncle, Edward Malley, at the time when James was still a schoolboy, and used to run into the store on his way home from school ; since he left the Malley store he had kept up his acquaintance with James Malley and with Walter. " When did you last see Jennie Cramer alive ?" asked Mr. Bollman. " I saw her on Friday night, August 5th," said the witness ; and being desired to tell the circumstances, he said that he went on that evening from his barn to the Railroad Grove, and then down a private road toward Payne's place. On this road he met her, with another lady, walking to- ward the grove ; she was a little in advance of the other and the two were laughing and joking ; just after them came three men who seemed to be "kind o' quarrelling," the one in the middle had a black mustache and the witness did not know him ; the one on his right was James Malley, Jr. ; witness passed nearest to him in going by ; the one on the other side he thought was Walter Malley ; just as the witness passed them in the path the man in the middle said : " I'll have it or else somebody '11 die." Witness was about five feet from the three men when this was said ; he could not say whether the girls heard the remark or not, but should sup- pose they did ; he heard no more of the conversation, although he stopped for a second and looked back ; he thought the remark was made in ear- nest, not in jest ; he was sure he would know the man with a black mus- tache if he should see him again ; this meeting was at about a quarter past eight o'clock ; about half or three quarters of an hour later he saw the same party again coming down off the platform at one of the bathing houses ; the two girls were again in the lead and the men were following ; of the men James Malley came first, and the second was the one [he thought was Walter ; the man with the black mustache was the next ; as the party came down Jennie Cramer said, " Good evening" to this witness and bowed, and he returned the salutation ; at this meeting he heard noth- 45 ing said excepting those words of greeting, but he did not think the party was sober ; they walked straight enough, and when he was asked why he thought they had been drinking the only thing the witness specified was thaj; one of the men ran into James, when the latter stopped and they dodged from one side to the other of one another. The man with the black mustache was dressed, the witness thought, in a short cutaway coat, straw hat, a black tie and had a big stud in his shirt bosom ; James Mal- ley had on a straw hat. Witness was positive that he was not mistaken as to having seen Jennie Cramer both times ; he knew, also, that he saw James Malley, as he recognized his face, but did not hear him say any- thing ; he fixed the time in the evening by its having been soon after he heard the whistle of the Newport boat. Reinhart Muentzner, who owns the flying horses, testified that he knew Jennie Cramer by sight, and that when he saw her body on the morning that it was found he said right off that it was the girl that rode on his fly- ing horses the night before ; he saw her a little after eight o'clock ; a man sat near her on the machine, and the man paid for her ride ; he did not know the man and could not describe his dress. The jury then went into secret session for the purpose of deciding on their verdict, announcing that they would in all probability listen to no more testimony. After half an hour, however, they adjourned at the re- quest of City Attorney Pickett, and are to hold their next session at the call of the coroner. New Haven, August 19, 1881. The talk of New Haven to-day, failing the probability of any develop- ments in the Cramer case, consists mainly of discussions about the way that it has been worked at by the authorities. " Have you any clew that leads you to think that the man with a black mustache who figured in the testimony yesterday was young Duff, of New York?" I asked Mr. Bush. " No, we do not think it was he," he replied. " Do you think it was Higgins ?" I asked. " Higgins" was formerly a clerk in New Haven, and has since, it is said, gone to New York and engaged in some business there. When he lived in New Haven he was one of many who paid attention to Jennie Cramer, and is said to have been a favored admirer of hers. Since the man with the black mustache has been talked of in connection with the Cramer case many persons have surmised that he was that shadowy individual, but so far as I can learn there is no foundation for any such opinion. Mr. Bush, however, was rather non-committal, and only said that no steps had been taken toward Higgins' arrest.* JENNIE CRAMER AND HER MOTHER. Gossip continues to run wildly on in regard to Jennie Cramer and her mother. A prominent city official here told me that he was surprised some time ago by a visit from a very pretty married lady, who asked him ab- ruptly if he knew her very well. He said, in some confusion, that he did not, and asked why he should be honored with such a question. " Well," said the lady, " Mrs. Cramer has been making remarks about us, and I wish you would let her know from me that if I hear any more of it she will hear from me." My informant adds that he was obliged to go and see Mrs. Cramer and tell her to stop talking, and that he believed that • As Jennie is dead, and her people poor, there will be no lack of " gossip " about the poor girl. 46 others had had similar experience. Jennie herself was fairly to be called a " hoodlum." She was remarkably pretty, as is known, and dressed as handsomely as almost any one in New Haven, but she was fond of what might fairly be called low society, and fraternized readily with strangers in strange places. Not seldom she had adventures in consequence that were by no means of a kind that a modest young woman would be likely to have, but which it is proper to say never were known to have any disas- trous end for her. Nothing worse is said of her here than that she was a hoodlum, although naturally enough many persons refuse to believe that she was a virtuous girl, even up to the time she made James Malley's acquaintance by flirting with him on the Green, which is the Mall of New Haven. Edward Malley, the father of Walter and the uncle of James, is a thin, well-barbered man, with a sandy mustache and shrewd face. He is hail- fellow-well-met, and talks right along. He said in his store to-day that he had no fears for Walter and James. He goes to see them twice a day at the jail. " Boys will be boys," said Mr. Malley, " and that is the whole of the story. As for Walter, he was at Branford Point on Friday night, August 5th. He went over with my coach and came back in it. He was at home by ten or eleven o'clock. He had a woman with him— I don't know who. He was met by a milkman on the way out, and the milkman laughed to see the boy with a woman. The truth is that Walter has always been a wondei fully quiet boy. He plays on the piano, and at home he has always hung about the house. He was too solemn and quiet to suit me. I often urged him to get out of the house and drive the horses, or do something. Often when I have been away he has managed all my busi- ness, signing checks, and all that, and he did it faithfully. James, his cousin, is a lively boy ; but he is a nice boy. I don't know where he was that Friday night. I haven't read a word of the testimony in the case. When I read a newspaper and come to that, I fling the newspaper away. That is all moonshine about Walter going down to New York frequently on Saturday night and staying over Sunday. The fact will be clearly es- tablished that neither of the boys had anything to do with the Cramer girl's death, you may depend upon it. That is all moonshine, too, about my putting money into this case. I haven't spent a cent except in the em- ployment of counsel, and if any man will prove to the contrary I will give him a deed of all the property I own. No detective has been employed by me. I was in New York when I heard of the trouble that the boys had got into, and when I came back, I found that Walter had a detective in his employ. I asked the boy what in the world he wanted of a detective, and why he threw away five dollars a day for nothing. He said that he would spend all he had in the world, and would work for a dollar a week for a hundred years, to get at the facts in this case. Of course I had nothing to say to that, and he keeps his detective still." JOHN DUFF JR.'S ACCOUNT OF AN INTERVIEW WITH THE MALLEYG AND THEIR COUNSEL. John Duff, Jr., said to a reporter of the New York Sun, at the residence of his father, ^t, West Tenth Street : " I first knew Walter Malley at Seton College. We were in the same grade, and became warm friends. I often visited him at his father's house in New Haven. " On July 2d, I went to visit him for the first time this summer. I re- mained until July 8th, when I returned to this city in company with Walter Malley. On landing Walter went at once to the house in West Thirty-first 47 Street to see Blanche Douglass. At half-past four o'clock on the following afternoon I received a letter from him asking me to meet him that night on Starin's New Haven boat at the foot of Cortlandt Street. I got there a few minutes before nine o'clock. He was sitting on the deck. Blanche Douglass was with him. He introduced me to her. It was the first time I had ever met her. Walter and his companion occupied the stateroom next to mine. We arrived in New Haven on the following morning. Walter told me that he was so well known that he did not care to be seen with Blanche Douglass. We left her on board the boat which stopped at New Haven until evening, and drove to the house of Edward Malley, Walter's father. After breakfast we then went to the store. Walter here left me, and going to the boat, took Blanche for a drive. Previously he had asked me to meet them at half-past ten o'clock that morning on the east side of the College Green. I did so. Walter left Blanche with me and drove off. At his request I took her to the Tremont House, where I engaged for her a room, and registered her as Miss Douglass. I then returned to the store and told both Walter and James Malley what I had done. They at once ■went to the hotel. James Malley was at this time well acquainted with Blanche Douglass, having met her in New York, and visited Coney Island in her company. "On the next day, Tuesday, July nth, Edward Malley went to New York, to be gone several days. Walter and James then proposed that we should go for a drive with some ladies. It was decided that we should visit Buell's, on the East Haven shore. At seven o'clock on Wednesday evening Walter took Blanche in his buggy and started for that place. James and I engaged a four-seated beach wagon. My companion was a lady liv- ing in New Haven. James's friend at the last moment disappointed him. He then sent a letter by a messenger to Miss Jennie Cramer, asking her to be one of the party. The boy brought a reply that she would be pleased to go. At half-past eight o'clock we drove up to her house. James went in- side, and soon returned w'ith Miss Cramer. It was the first time I had ever seen her. She struck me as being remarkably pretty. She appeared to be a very lively girl, but nothing worse. When we reached Buell's Miss Cra- mer was introduced to Blanche Douglass, who in manner and appearance is very quiet and ladylike. Walter and Blanche, who, when we arrived, were partaking of refreshment, soon after left in the buggy. After supper our party also started for home. We drove slowly and reached New Haven at midnight. " We dropped my companion at her residence, and James took Miss Cra- mer home. I went to my room in Foote's Hotel, opposite Malley's store, and James soon after found me. He said that he was not very intimately acquainted with Miss Cramer. The next time I saw Miss Cramer was on Thursday evening. She carae into the store after six o'clock to buy some lace. The clerks were gone, and she said that she would come again on Friday. I did not go to the store on Friday and never again saw Jennie Cramer. On Friday evening Walter told me that Blanche Douglass had left New Haven. On Saturday night I came to New York. On the fol- lowing Wednesday I met Walter in this city. He told me that his father had gone to the White Mountains and that he would probably follow him the next day. " I had no further communication with or from Walter until Sunday, August 7th, when I read in the papers of the finding of the body of Miss Cramer, and that the Malleys were mixed up in the matter. I at once sent Walter the following telegram : 48 " ■ Can I help you in this trouble ?' " A few hours later I received an answer. It read as follows : " ' Thanks for yours to hand. Come up in tonight's boat.' " I went to New Haven on the ] p.m. train on Monday. 1 saw Walter, and with him called on Blanche Douglass, who was stopping at the Austin House. In my presence they rehearsed the story that Blanche was to tell. In effect it was that she was the sister of an agent for a patent car coupler, whose name was J. J. Douglass ; that he travelled all over the United States ; and that he had sent her to New Haven for her health, while he went off on a business trip. She was to say that the last time she heard from him was through a letter written from Scranton, Pa. I was to have known the brother for three years, and to vouch for the truth of the story. Walter told me that his sole object was to shield Blanche Douglass, for whom he had a great infatuation. I said that I thought the story was very weak and did not think that it would be believed. I suggested that I should tell it that night to Walter's lawyer and see what he thought of it. That evening I told the story in the office of ex-Judge Blydenburg, and in the presence of the judge, Lasvyer Fox, and James and Walter Malley. James, Mr. Blydenburg, and I then left the room, leaving Walter with Mr. Fox, who was his counsel. Mr. Fox also told him that he did not believe the story. It was weak and would not be credited. He said that my tes- timony would do more for the prosecution than the defence if that story was told at the inquest. He said that as I knew the true facts about Blanche Douglass, I had beter leave New Haven at once. Walter told me this as he drove me down to the midnight boat, on which I left for this city. He told me at the same time that he had not seen Jennie Cramer after the Thursday morning on which she left his father's house in com- pany with Blanche Douglass. He said that Blanche and Jennie Cramer had slept together in one room on the Wednesday night, and that he and James had occupied another." WHAT NEXT ? The reader is now as well able as we are to deliver a verdict upon the question, " Who killed Jennie E. Cramer?" For that killed she was is only too certain. Everything goes to show that it was no suicide. Even those persons who are trying to prove that the unfortunate girl was of a light and frivolous disposition, by that very allegation do away with the supposition that she was so frightened at her parents' chiding that she took her own life. Much has been said about the supineness of the people of West Haven and its vicinage — and, indeed, their apathy has been remarka- ble ; especially if we contrast their behavior with that of another New England community, when Squire White, of Salem — a rich old gentleman — was cruelly murdered. On that occasion Boston and Salem joined in a vast vigilance committee, large rewards were offered, pardon was assured to any accomplice who would give testimony, and Daniel Webster was employed to bring the guilty to the scaffold. Although the hand of sus- picion is pointed unerringly at the Malleys — it may be that they are inno- cent, if so, may God give them a good deliverance ! One thing is certain, the crime, or crimes, have been committed at places too much frequented for a veil to be drawn over the hideous tragedy and its precedent events — unless money is poured out like water to buy silence or perjury. Every father and brother in Connecticut should make it their own cause to hunt the criminals to the death — be the criminals either tramps or millionaires. Don't let this be another Mary Rogers and Mary Stannard case. THE END. 49 JAMES MALLEY, JR, so i New Haven, August 22. The Malleys were again brought before Justice Booth, in Thompson's Hall, West Haven, this morning at nine o'clock. Walter and James, Jr., were quiet in demeanor, and listened quietly to the arguments of counsel. Both wore red roses in their button-holes. James was the paler of the two. Counsellor Bush requested a continuance of the hearing for two weeks, and . read a letter from Professor R. H. Chittenden, stating that the chemical ^ analysis of Jennie Cramer's remains would not be completed before Sep- tember 5th, two weeks from to-day. Justice Booth granted a continuance on the ground that he believed the State was honest in its statement, and that circumstances warranted it. Mr. Fox then moved that his clients be released on bail, but after a recess to 3 P.M. for consideration, the Justice denied the motion for bail. The inquest upon the death of Jennie Cramer was resumed to-day. The Malley boys occupied raised seats facing the spectators, and bore their scru^ tiny with composure. Their appearance had greatly improved since their arraignment a week before ; they listened closely to the testimony and smiled occasionally at laughable incidents in the proceeding. James still continues the more reserved of the two, and follows the testimony more closely. The testi- mony was upon the whereabouts of James Malley, Jr., during business hours on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, and especially on Thursday and Friday nights. The testimony of his sister and father was to the effect that he was at home all Friday evening and night. The first witness, John V. Hallenbeck, who resides at Savin Rock, testi- fied that he saw the girl whose body was found on the beach, on Friday, August sth, about half .past 5 p.m., as she was passing his premises in Grove Street, with another lady. He noticed them as they were hand- somely dressed. Edward H. Smith, who keeps a bowling alley and bar next door to John V. Hallenbeck, testified that he was strolling on the beach about midnight on Friday, August 5th, he heard voices apparently coming from the beach ; he was in doubt as to the exact locality they came from. He heard a girl's and a man's voice, the girl talked most and loudest ; it was a quarrel. It was then about 12.15 Saturday morning. James Bohn, Edward Malley's coachman, testified that Walter Malley had the new-topped buggy that night and a dark bay mare. Walter came home about II P.M., as far as witness could remember. Witness then went to bed. The counsel questioned witness closely concerning his having been at Lutz's Saturday morning about 11 o'clock to get a drink, and having stated to Charles Wilson there that he had been up until 3 or 4 o'clock that morning waiting for the horses. The witness denied having said so ; he remembered having been there. Joseph H. Marvin, the man at the flying- horses, who testified Thursday last to having seen Jennie Cramer. driving on Friday evening, August 5 th, was called on to state whether he saw in the room the man who was riding by the side of Jennie Cramer. He pointed out James Malley and said his general appearance corresponded with that of the man with Jennie, but he was not certain that the two were identical. James Mallay showed perfect composure during this incident. Benjamin F. Brady, who testified also on Thursday last, pointed out James Malley as being the one in his opinion who came to his tent on the Friday evening in question.' The next witness was Miss Theresa A. Kennedy, who is em- ployed in the Malley store, and keeps the time-book there. She examined 51 the book and gave the following results from James Malley's time record on Friday : Came, 7.45 ; left ii.20 ; returned, 2.15. Saturday : 7.45 ; i ; 2.10. A recess was then taken for one hour. The inquest was resumed at 2 o'clock. Patrick F. Carroll, who is employed in Edward Malley's store, testified that he worked at the same counter with James Malley, Jr. He saw him come into the store Friday morning. James requested witness about 6 o'clock to get a saddle-horse for him. James Malley had ordered the saddle-horse on Friday for himself ; witness had never seen James ride a horse ; he fixed the date by the finding of the body next day. He saw James Malley last that night outside at the Temple Street entrance. James then said he would see about the saddle-horse himself. Witness next saw James Saturday morning outside the door at about 10 minutes to 8. Wit- ness heard of the death of Jennie Cramer while in the store on Saturday morning ; he went to James and told him of it ; James heard it then for the first time, and appeared very much surprised William C. Mountain, employed as clerk in Edward Malley's store, cor- roborated the statements of others that James Malley, Jr., had no unusual privileges in the store. A lady came into the store, about 4 o'clock on Thursday and talked with James Malley ; witness thought he heard James say he (James) had not seen her that day, but that if he did he would say that her mother wanted her. He saw James covering the goods at 6 o'clock. Witness saw James in front of the store Friday at a little after 5 P.M. with his hat on ; he saw him next at 6 o'clock. Robert Taylor testified that he had a touch of cholera morbus, and so proposed the purchase of liquor. James Malley did not drink a drop of it. Witness had told Counsellor BoUman before that he could not remember whether James was in the store on Friday afternoon or not. Witness went yesterday with James Malley,' Sr., to see James at the jail, and make sure about whether James was in the store on Friday afternoon or not. He had not mentioned the liquor question at the jail. Mrs. Katie C.Mains, who is employed at Edward Malley's store, said she first saw James Malley, Jr., Saturday morning between 7.45 and 8 o'clock. She had never told anyone James looked strange that morning. Miss Louisa C. Malley, sister of James Malley, Jr., testified that while she was watering the flowers in the yard, her brother James was in the dining- room sitting with "his shoes off ; he came home at 7 o'clock ; supper was served between 7 and 8 o'clock ; she was in the yard when James came home. James took a bath immediately, after supper. Witness went into the yard to pick up apples while James was bathing. She saw James when he came home from the bath-room ; she was then in her bedroom. Her father was in his room writing. James Ihen shaved in the witness's room and went to bed about 9 o'clock. The witness then went to the sitting-room and stayed for about half an hour ; she then went upstairs and saw James in bed, as his door was open. The witness retired at 11 p.m. After she had been in bed a short time she rose to get a pillow, as the three, herself and two sisters, occupied one room. She went to James's room and got a pillow from James. He was in bed. She rose at half-past 6 the next morning and saw James in bed then. The witness first heard of Jennie Cramer's death Saturday noon. James did not come home for dinner. The witness was not certain where she was when James canie home Saturday ni^ht ; she was not positive about his being in. for supper. "" How is it that you know all about James' whereabouts on Friday night and do not on the other nights ?" Counsellor Bollman asked. , 52 The witness did not say ; she had made her first statement to Messrs. Fox and Blydenburgh last week ; she had had no doubts as to whether James stayed at home on Thursday or Friday night. James Malley, Sr., was then sworn. He testified he was superintendent at his brother's store, and gave a detailed account of what took place Fri- day night ; he asked Louisa why she did not have James water the plants ; James had his shoes off when he came in and he gave this as the reason. Louisa had generally watered the plants ; James had done it occasionally. Later in the night he heard the girls talking about the pillow, and said they might have one of his, but they took it from James's room ; later in the ■ night the dogs were barking, somewhere from 12 to 2 o'clock, and he heard James get up and stop them ; the witness retired at about 10 o'clock ; James was in his room, and the witness was in bed, when James said to one of his sisters, who was asking for a pillow, ' ' You can have my pillow. The witness, James Malley, Sr., gave a minute account of the transac- tions at his house Friday night, and corroborated the story told by his daughter. To account for his being awake, he said his daughters were quarrelling in their, room over a towel, and this awakened him, and had afterward come for a pillow. He had asked his son on Thursday morning, " Where were you last night ?" The expression, " It was lucky you were home last night, ' ' referred to Friday night, and was used on Saturday even- ing, when James said a Union reporter had connected his name with Jen- nie's death. He could not tell whether James had Walter's horse on Wednesday or Thursday night. After this testimony the jury held a short consultation and adjourned until Friday at 9 a.m. New Haven, August 23. While the people are discussing the legal aspects of the case, the father and mother of the dead girl are patiently waiting for some light upon the cause of her mysterious death. Jacob Cramer's house is united with his cigar-store, the whole being a plain brick dwelling of two stories. The lower story front is a cigar-store and shoe-shop combined ; the rear of this story is used as kitchen and dining-room ; above are the -parlor and the bed- rooms. The parlor, where Jennie Cramer was last seen by her mother in the company of Blanche Douglass, is a small room tastily furnished ; its walls are hung with many pictures in pretty frames. There is a piano and books aiid numerous parlor ornaments, all indicating good taste and a love of the beautiful. Mrs. Cramer sat to-day where she stood when she last saw Jennie, and talked about her daughter. She spoke in a low tone of voice. Mrs. Cramer said of Jennie : " She was always a good, kind girl, and confided everything to me. §he used to go to Sunday-school and church at the old North Church until she was fifteen. Then she gave it up when [ went to Europe. She was sickly and in poor health until within a few years ; yet she was even then deli- cate, and her peculiar white complexion was mainly the result of her weak physical state. She made a confident of me in everything ; it had become a custom with her. If she had had any trouble or had done anything wrong I should have known it; She told me all about her relatix)ns to George Higgins, a former clerk in the Malley store, and said that he was always gentlemanly toward her. He came here last fall and remained some three evenings in all, remaining until about 10 o'clock. Jennie said she could not say the same of JameS Malley, Jr., and that she did not know what to do ; she wished to get away from him. She deceived him often in order to avoid going with him. The note she wrote to him saying she was S3 going to Bristol when he asked her to go with Walter and Blanche and him- self was untrue. Yet she said to me once, ' I won't deceive him, mother, for he cross-examines me until he finds out the truth. ' " Mrs. Cramer said, in concluding, that she did not believe Jennie Cramer left the house alone on Thursday, August 4th. " I c;annot but believe she went with Blanche Douglass," she said earnestly. One statement was made by Mr;,^. Cramer which points to the implication of James Malley. In the meshes of the trimming of Jennie's hat she had found a peculiar pin which did not belong to Jennie. It will be rernembered that Mrs. Cramer had called on James Malley Thursday afternoon, at the store, to make in- quiries about Jennie. Mrs. Cramer said : " I am positive I saw that same pin on James Malley's tie that afternoon." She described it minutely, and the tie that James wore. Counsellor Bollman had taken the pin in charge. A cloak was also found on the beach Saturday morning near the body. This is supposed to belong to Blanche Douglass, as she gave her cloak to Jennie before at the beach, and Jennie had no heavy covering for Friday evening. , Thursday morning about 10 o clock George Morris, of No. 328 Grand Street, of this city, was riding in a horse-car with William P. Keegan, clerk of C. R. Converse's drug-store at the corner of Grand and Franklin Streets. Morris said : " At the corner of State and Chapel Streets two girls got on the car on Thursday morning. One of them was Jennie Cramer. I have known her for five or six years. I bowed to her, and she recognized me. Mr. Morris and J. talked together about the two girls, and commented on Jennie when she rose to pull the strap to stop the car. The girls came as if from the Elliott House, which is a short distance south of the corner of State and Chapel Streets. They got out at Hugo's grocery store, just at the comer a few doors north of the Cramer cigar-store and walked down toward Jennie's home. The other one must have been Miss Douglass, as it is agreed the two went to Jennie's home at this time. As near as I can cal- culate it was about half-past ten. " I was sitting in front of the drug-store, which is at the next corner south of Hugo's and a few doors south of the Cramer store, about i o'clock, reading, when I saw Jennie get on a Fairhaven and Westville car going up toward the centre of the town. It must have been about i, as Mr. Converse had been gone to dinner some time; In fact he came back in a short time afterward, and I spoke to him about seeing Jennie. I know it was Jennie, for this is the drug-store she patronized, and where it was claimed she got the arsenic that made her fair complexion." " Where was she when you first saw her the last time ?" " Just stepping on the car. She cut across the corner of the road on the side of the lamp-post toward her house, as if she had just come from that direction. ' ' "Was she alone?" " No ; at least it appeared so. Another girl got on at the same time just before her, and was standing on the platform apparently waiting for her. I did not see her face. I thought it was the same pprson I saw come down with Jennie and go home with her. She had on apparently the same dress, and was of the same form. This was nearly, if not quite i o'clock, I am positive." , . Mr. C. R. Converse, the proprietor, corroborated this story so far as he was concerned. He said he never went to dinner before 1 2 and returned about I. The account, as thus given, shows that Blanche's statement is 54 not correct that Jennie was on the Savin Rock car between n and 12 o'clock. From the corner of Grand and Chapel, where Jennie Cramer got on the car about i o'clock, to Church and Chapel, where the Savin Jlock cars start, is three quarters of a mile. The questiori then naturally arises whether Jennie did not accompany Blanche after leaving home that Thurs- day morning. New Haven, August 24. The statement regarding the pin found on Jennie Cramer's hat by her. mother has produced considerable commotion here to-day. The article as described by Mrs. Cramer is a jet pin set in gold, a horseshoe inform, with a bell-shaped or tulip-shaped attachment. This pin, Mrs. Cramer said, she was sure she saw on James Malley's tie when she called on him at the store on Thursday, August 7th. Attention was called to the pin at the undertak- ing e'stablishment of Stahl & Hegel, where the body of Jennie was taken. The pin fell to the floor from the hat, and no special notice was taken of it. Co,roner Bollman and Dr. Painter learned from Mrs. Cramer that the pin did not belong to Jennie. James Malley, Jr', denies ever having worn such a pin. He said to-day the only pin he had had for years was the one he now wears at the jail — a mosaic stone mounted in yellow gold attached to a long pin. The authorities are also investigating certain carriage or wagon tracks found on Savin Rock Beach a day or two after the discovery of the body. They are still partially visible and lie near the Malley bathing and boat- house. Edward Malley has a cottage on Beach Street, which skirts the shore ; this season it is rented to William K. Townsend, a lawyer of New Haven ; it lies some forty rods east of the spot where Jennie's body was found. New Haven, August 25. The hearing of the charge against Blanche Douglass was postponed to-day. Mr. Cramer and his son, who lives in New York, have recently received letters denouncing them for not wreaking vengeance on the Malleys. Sheriff Peck has also received letters and postal cards on the subject. The stories concerning those who saw Jennie at Savin Rock on Friday, August 5th, still keep coming in. The last one is that of a Mr. Weisner and wife, of Meriden, who noticed a beautiful girl in a white dress with beads around her neck, about 6 o'clock that afternoon. There are many reports to-day as to what Mr. Bollman, Detective Reilley, and the locksmith found in the Malley bathing-houses night before last. An evening paper says a small phial, such as druggists use, was one thing found ; that there was nothing in it, but that a pungent odor came from it ; the cork was new. A juryman said to-day he thought this to be a mislead- ing clew. New Haven, August 26. While the hearing was in progress. Lawyer Fox rose to make a request. He said that in fairness the two accused young men should be allowed to come down from New Haven jail and hear what was going on, The county sheriff has explained that this strict seclusion of his prisoners is made neces- sary by the niggardly provision for the employment of keepers, there being only two to attend to the nearly 200 persons in confinement. An intelligent and lady-like witness, by name Mrs. Charles H. Miller, told the jury to-day that she had known Jenjiie Cramer 14 years, and had been intimate with her. She saw her pass the city market in Chapel Street 55 just before 3 o'clock the Thursday afternoon before the Saturday when her body was taken from the water. There was a lady with her whose face she did not see. They were talking and- walking fast in the direction of the Elliott House. The dress of Jennie's companion was minutely described by Mrs. Miller — a dark skirt with a gold-brocaded basque, white hat with a blue feather. This gold-brocaded basque has been a principal object in the minds of the detectives who have worked on the case. It was an un- usually pretentious and gorgeous article of attire, and the identification of the basque was tantamount to an identification of the woman as nobody else than Blanche Douglass. Now Blanche in all her stories has insisted that the last she saw of Jennie Cramer was about 11 o'clock Thursday forenoon, when she saw her on a West Haven car. The witness further fixes the fact that Jennie and Blanche were together Thursday by testifying that the woman with the remarkable basque was the same with whom she had sat at the Austin House table, and who then called herself Miss Clements. Said Mrs. Miller : ■" While at the Austin House"myself and a friend were talking of the Cramer case, and she (Blanche Douglass) seemed deeply interested. She looked at me with those terrible big eyes of hers." The same witness told how she had met the two girls Wednesday evening, when the Douglass girl was wear- ing that bg^sque and Jennie Cramer was dressed in white. These things the witness had voluntarily told to Jennie's mother. The witness knew she had seen the two together Thursday, as stated, because she had not risen from bed until 12 o'clock, her usual bed-time being 2 o'clock in the morning. Mrs. Miller's husband keeps a saloon and billiard-room at Chapel and Union Streets, and the family lives in the building, which accounts for Mrs. Miller's unseasonable hours for retiring. An important witness, named Samuel J. Mattoon, testified in proof that the Douglass girl lied when she said she had not seen Jennie Cramer since II o'clock Thursday forenoon. He said that he was a clerk in the drug- store under the Elliott House, and had known Jennie for years. He saw her alive Thursday evening, August 4th, with a lady who had been since shown to him as Miss Douglass. Mr, Mattoon was positive that one of the girls was Jennie, for he saw a mole on her neck, her dress being cut low. Miss Bertha Williamson testified that she did chamber-work for Mr. Neu: man, the janitor of the Foote Building, at No. 400-^ Chapel Street. The building was the home of the late Admiral Alexander H. Foote, and was purchased years ago by Edward Malley and remodelled, the lower story be- ing converted into stores, and the upper part into lodging-rooms, of which there are many. It is at Temple and Chapel Streets, being the building next north of Malley's store. Across Chapel Street is Trinity Church. On the first floor is Redcliffe's restaurant, which has been frequently mentioned in the case. The chambermaid said that Walter Malley carried the key to Room No. 26, and she had known him to stay over night, but, as far as she knew, without company. On Thursday morning, two days before the find- ing of Jennie Cramer's body in the water, Walter Malley came to Miss Wil- liamson and told her to fix up No. 29 and put in water and towels. 'She followed his directions, putting in bed sheets and pillow-cases, as well as water and towels. Walter took the key of the room with him. The next morning the chambermaid tried the door of the room and found it locked. Looking through the keyhole she saw the forms of two persons beneath the bed-clothing. One of them was a man. The back of. his head was turned toward her. The hair was dark. " From what you saw there that 56 . morning, and what you know of James Malley, what would you say ?' asked Coroner BoUman. " I should say it was James Malley' s head," was the emphatic reply. Between 8 and 9 o'clock the witness saw Walter and James Malley come out of the room, and soon after she wenfinto it, and also into No. 26. The beds in both rooms were mussed and soiled — that in No. 29 the most so. The witness said that when she told Mr. and Mrs. Neuman of what she had seen they told her to say nothing about it. Re- porters of the local papers say they have questioned Mr. Neuman about the matter and he has denied that the Malley boys occupied rooms there just previous to the tragedy. The jurors and detectives regard this testimony as of much importance. The theory is that Walter and Blanche Douglass slept that night at the Malley house. This is in accordance with the so- called confession of the Douglass woman, that James Malley, Jr., and Jen- nie Cramer slept in Room No. 29, Foote's Building, and that the bed in room No. 26 was tumbled some time Thursday afternoon. William E. Hunter, of Southington, was at Savin Rock at the time of the death of Jennie Cramer, and saw the body soon after it was taken from the water. He told the jury of inquest that the evening previous he was in Rail- road Grove, and about 9 o'clock he saw the same girl riding with another .young woman and two young men on the flying-horses. A young man, evi- dently under the influence of drink, dressed in a blue suit and having a black mustache, got on to the horse by the side of Jennie. The girl ap- peared to be sick and dizzy, and begged them to stop the horses. This was done, and the party moved off in the direction of the swings. The young man who had rode beside Jennie got off also and followed them. He spoke with a strong Irish brogue, and appeared to have ' ' roped ' ' himself into the party. Near Hale's' restaurant the witness saw the young man speak to an older man, with a full beard, who appeared to belong about the grounds. The man spoken to seemed to wish to avoid an encounter and moved away. Mr. Hunter's wife testified to the same effect. She saw that Jennie was overcome with dizziness, and she saw her head fall upon the black-mus- tached man's shoulder, but she did not think he was one of her party. Jennie Kendrick, of Auburn, N. Y., was with Mr. and Mrs. Hunter, and saw the incident at the grove. She thought Jennie was intoxicated and feared she would fall off. As she alighted from the horses Miss Kendrick heard her say, " My God, I'm paralyzed." • Much of the time of the jury to-day was taken up by a discussion of the right of the jury to compel W. A. Harris, manager of the Western Union Telegraph Company, to produce all the telegrams which are believed (but not certainly known) to have passed between the Malleys, Mr. Duff, and the Douglass girl between the 4th and 9th of August, inclusive. Mr. Harris was threatened with a capias unless he should produce them during the afternoon. His counsel, Mr. H. A. Newton, denied the right of the cor- oner's jury to have them, and Harris positively refused to produce them. New Haven, August 28. The New Haven Union, a paper that has taken great pains to ferret out , and publish all the facts in this dreadful case, gives the following, and there is the best reason for believing that it is accurately what it purports to be, the theory of the jury in the Cramer case : " In the first place, the jury are known to be satisfied that the girl died a violent death. The shallow water in which the body was found, the ab- sence of water in the stomach and lungs, show that death did not come to her through drowning. They are also satisfied that there was no suicide. 57 Then arises the consideration of who was with Jennie Cramer last, who was familiar with her, and who had a motive to get rid of her. The Malleys have told stories which the jury consider demonstrably false on the strength of what testimony has been received. They learn first that Jennie Cramer had talked with her mother on several occasions about marrying James Mal- ley, Jr. Then they come to the Wednesday night at the Malley house, and they have more than an intimation that James Malley, Jr., then accomplished his purpose of seducing her under the promise of marriage. The next morning they find Jennie Cramer at her home. She talks with her mother and then goes away. Now comes an inference. She had purposely for- saken her home, thinking that now she had the best possible plea to make James Malley, Jr., marry her. She is known to have been seen opposite the Malley store. Then she is known to have got on a car for Savin Rock and looked about to see if some one was not coming.. Then she got off the car and got on again, the car having been stopped at her request. The in- ference or supposition oft this point is this : She had sent word to James Malley, Jr., that she would go to Savin Rock, and had named the time. James Malley, Jr., had no desire to marry her, and was trying to avoid her. It was therefore, not reasonable to suppose that he would meet her on this car, and he didn't. The testimony is to the effect that James Malley, Jr., was away from the store only a short time on the afternoon of the fatal Friday. He is known in this time to have taken a walk up in Trumbull Street with Jennie Cramer. The jury think that then she was urging him to marry her, and that he then put her off until later, saying in substance, ' It will not do for me to be away from the store long now.' Then Jennie Cramer is seen on the car by Frank Keenan in the afternoon going down to Savin Rock. James Malley, Jr., and family testify that when James came home on Friday evening his feet troubled him and pained him, yet at 6 o'clock he was pro- posing to Brunt to go and take a carriage ride. Then he talked about a horseback ride. Then he is seen at 7.40 or 7.50 stroking the neck of a horse in Temple Street, near Redcliffe's. Then he is recognized positively by Gilchrist at Savin Rock, where Jennie had gone previously. About the identification of James and Jennie Cramer Gilchrist is certain. He had lived opposite Jennie Cramer's home for a long time, and he had worked in Malley's store. Now the jury think that the conference concerning James Malley, Jr., marrying Jennie Cramer was at Savin Rock on Friday evening, after being broken off in the afternoon. They think that the girl had by this time become importunate, and had realized that this was the only chance to extract further pledges from James Malley, Jr." , MR. Allen's testimony. New Haven, August 29. " I have resided in New Haven since May i, 1881 ; lived in Northford town for about nine 3'ears previous to my coming to New' Haven, and was born in Brooklyn, New York. I have known Jennie Cramer by sight for some time ; she used to visit in Northford and was spoken of to me as ' Miss Crimer, ' of New Haven. I was told her father had a cigar-store in Grand Street, New Haven ; she was visiting a family in Northford ; I saw her at Northford a number of times in the village store and on the street •, her complexion attracted particular attention ; I don't remember having seen her in New Haven biit once, and that was the Friday before the finding of her body ; I was then riding up Chapel Street on a horse car, standing on the left hand side of the rear platform ; as the car passed the Redcliffe 58 restaurant, at Chapel and Temple Streets, ;a earriage, I think a buggy, with red running gear, came down Chapel Street and passed between the car and the restaurant ; I can't say whether the buggy had a top or not ; it wasa one-horse team, with a dark-colored horse, I think, but I am not sure ; I did not notice the team so much, my attention being particularly attracted by the lady in the buggy ; it was Jennie Cramer, the same girl I had seen sev- eral times in Northford, according to my best belief ; this large picture (a cabinet photograph of Jennie Cramer was here shown to the witness) is the photograph of Jennie Cramer, the girl I saw in Northford and Chapel Street that Friday night ; after I first saw her in the buggy I turned and looked at her again and was then sure and am now sure she was Jennie Cramer ; as to her dress I think she had on a light dress and a light hat with a broad brim, but am not sure ; with her in the same buggy was a young man appar- ently about twenty-two years of age, with a small white straw hat on, whom I had met in Chapel Street a good many times and also in Malley's store, where I had bought a necktie of him — I think the day before — and he put the necktie on my collar. POSITIVE RECOGNITION OF JAMES MALLEY. " Since that Friday I have seen that young man only once, and that was in the barber-shop of the New Haven County Jail. He was in the barber's chair ; the only man beside him in that room was the barber ; I stood in the doorway, and an official of the jail was with me ; he was not pointed out to me in any way ; before going to the barber-shop I went down the whole length of the jail and looked at all the-men I had a chance to look at ; I am sure the man who was then in the barber's chair and turned around and looked me square' in the face was the same man whom I saw in the buggy with Jennie Cramer near the corner of Chapel and Temple Streets on the Friday night previous to the finding of Jennie Cramer's body. The time I saw them in the buggy was between 6 and 8 o'clock in the even- ing, and my opinion is that it was a little after 7 o'clock, judging from the fact that I was on my way home the second time that evening. My impression is I saw them turn around the Redcliffe corner into Temple Street, but I am not sure as to that. When they were passing me I think they walked their horse and the car was also going slow ; I know it was that Friday because when I heard of Jennie Cramer's death for the first time the next day, Saturday, I said at once in the presence of my wife and brother that I had seen Jennie ' Cramer the night before ; I have no doubt the couple in that buggy were Jennie Cramer and the young man I saw at the jail to-day in the barber's chair, and am positive the young man I saw in the barber's chair at the jail to-day is the same young man who sold me a necktie and put it on my collar at Malley's store ; the counter at which he sold me the tie was on the right hand as you enter and near the Chapel Street door in Edward Malley's store." THE LADY IN LIMBO. The popular clamor for the imprisonment of Blanche Douglass has to-day resulted in the incarceration of the woman in the county jail. Mr. Peck left West Haven with the woman just after the session of the jury spoken of above, and drove at once to the county jail, arriving there at about 8 o'clock. She was very plainly clad in a dress of some light texture and dark color, and wore a hat with a veil coming half way down her face. Her face when she arrived at the jail showed traces of weeping, and Sheriff Peck said afterward that she cried bitterly during the ride, but she was ap' 59 parently calm as the buggy was driven up to the jail door. She sprang out and walked up the steps into the office of the jail unassisted and sat down in a chair, while her custodian handed to Jailer Stevens the mittimus which ■was his warrant for transferring her from his own charge to that of another. Very few words were spoken, and the woman was presently taken into a private room and searched, but nothing of importance was found on her person. Her baggage, consisting of a single valise, was given into the charge of the jailer, and she was at once taken to the women's quarter of ' the jail and locked in a cell. New Haven, August 30. John H. Dillon Keeps a grocery store at No. 333 Congress Avenue. In his employment is a boy about 17 years old named Patrick Lynch. He is a bright, clever young fellow. He told Mr. Dillon, very soon after the trag- ^edy occurred, that he saw James Malley and Jennie Cramer on Friday ride past the store in a buggy, proceeding in the direction of the city. He thought they turned the corner of Howard Avenue, which would be the way that they would take if going toward Savin Rock. There is good rea- son to believe that this young man knows James Malley, and there is no question that he knew Jennie Cramer sufficiently well for a full identifica- tion. Two of the sisters of the Lynch boy are clerks in Edward Malley's store. One of them keeps the time-book which was made use of to prove that James was at the store during business hours. Miss Lynch is not the regular time-keeper, but acts as substitute for Mrs. Theresa Kennedy on occasions when that lady is otherwise engaged. It is natural that the boy should now be chary of saying anything to jeopardize his sister's welfare. Michael Malley was known to have been to the beach, on the Friday ■ evening preceding the finding of the body. He did not appear to-day — although his testimony was needed. He was seen, it is said, on the above occasion with a very white-faced lady — not his wife. Harry Ford's deposition was taken. He is not supposed to have any guilty knowledge of the fatal event. He gave a fair explanation of his whereabouts. New Haven, August 31. To-day has furnished no exception to the rule that has been exemplified every day since the investigation began. For example, James Malley ex- plicitly denied yesterday that he had ever driven in Walter Malley's red- wheeled buggy, although Mr. Allen had testified that he saw James Malley and Jennie Cramer in such a buggy on the fatal Friday evening. James said that he had ridden in the buggy with Walter, but had never driven in it and had never hired such a vehicle in his life. Yet James Malley, Sr., has testified in court that his son brought Walter Malley's buggy home and afterward went out with Walter Malley. The Douglass woman says that her maiden name was Annie Kearns, not Annie Hines. She refused to say whether she married a Zimmerman or a Fitzpatrick, or to go into any further particulars of her personal history, excepting to declare that the house in Thirty-first Street, where she was arrested, is the first and only one of the kind of which she has ever been an inmate. In this particular she is contradicted by those who knew her in New York. She says that when she heard of Jennie Cramer's death she felt so badly that she thought she would go crazy. She at once went up to the Malley store and sent in for Walter and he and James came out, and the three walked and talked together on the streets. The two Malleys told her, when she inquired if Jennie was dead, that they had heard it in the store. She says that she was much excited and told Walter that she wanted to go back to New York 6o at once, as she did not want to stay and be mixed up in the affair, but the two men advised her to stay, saying that it would only be worse for her to run away then, and she yielded. Neither of them, she declares, said a word then or at any other time which would give her any idea of how Jen- nie Cramer came to her death. Nor had she ever heard anything from any- body which gave her any such idea. BLANCHE Douglass's complaint. The woman complains bitterly that she has not been treated as she was promised since she voluntarily came back to New Haven, without waiting for a requisition. Being questioned about the testimony th#t had been given in reference to her being seen with Jennie Cramer on Thursday afternoon, she said she believed that the witnesses»were mistaken (they positively identified her last week before the jury), and added, " I am pretty certain I can explain the whole thing and show just where I was that afternoon, but I won't do it now ; not now. I am not going to tell anything more till the right time comes in court. Then I will tell it, and will prove that I did not see Jen- nie that Thursday afternoon. It must remain a secret now, and no one can get it out of me." ^ " And you told all the lies you did in the beginning on account of Wal- ter Malley ?" " Yes. He said on no account must the Bundy name come out. He told them all in the store, he said, that I was a respectable girl, who lived in New York, and who was supported by my brother." James Riley, the alleged New York bartender, who has claimed to be the Douglass woman's lover, is now said to be a detective. He figures in the case almost as mysteriously as ' ' the man with the black mustache. ' ' ' New Haven, September 3. The proceedings of the coroner's jury of inquest to-day have been of the greatest moment to the young men, James and Walter Malley, wTio on Monday are to be brought before Justice Booth on the charge of murder. Since their incarceration both the prisoners havei somewhat failed in per- sonal appearance. Walter has lost flesh, and James is suffering from a severe attack of nervous disease, which has taken the form of neuralgia. This morning, so great were his sufferings that the keeper of the jail, Mr. Isbell, was obliged to assist him to arise from bed. The jury assembled at about ten o'clock this forenoon in Thompson's Hall. James W. Brunt, an employ? at E. Malley's store, told the jury that he had refused an invitation from James Malley to ride to West Haven Friday evening, the night before the finding of the body. He met James at 6.30, and afterward went to his boarding-house, where he stayed until eight o'clock, and did not hire any carriage or saddle-horse for James. He said that the store was lively with rats. There was a livery stable near, and he thought the rats came from the stable. Michael J. Kelley testified that he was an employe at Deibel's restaurant, in Chapel Street, where he attended to tables on the evening of Thursday, August 4th. He remembered a party of three coming in the place that Thursday night, and asking for a chicken salad and lamb chops. They did not get waited on and went away. Since then he had been called upon by a person who told him that the party who called that night were the Malley boys and Blanche Douglass. This witness gave some details of the matter, and said he thought he could now point out the three persons. Mrs. Minnie Klippstein, wife of Charles Klippstein, the barber, residing 6.1 ^l ^°i ^^^ Chapel Street, third Mot, opposite the Elliott House, testified that she had known Jennie Cramer from girlhood to nearly the time of her death. She did not know James Malley or Blanche Douglass. The Fri- day evening before the Saturday that the body of Jennie Cramer was found, this witness saw a buggy in front of the Elliott House. A lady and gentleman entered the carriage. Mrs. Crofut, who also lives opposite the hotel and saw the same occurrence, told her that the persons in the buggy were Walter Malley and Blanche Douglass. There was ancther.young man with them, and she told her friend Mrs. Crofut that she thought him no gentleman, because he allowed the lady to get into the carriage without as- sistance. At this time the other young man was pointed out to her as James Malley. Walter and Blanche drove down Chapel Street and the gentleman went up the street. This was about seven o'clock, the witness being positive that it was Friday evening. The day before the witness had seen Miss Cramer. and Miss Douglass in company in front of the Elliott House. One of them rang the bell at the ladies' entrance. Jennie Cramer was dressed in white, and Miss Douglass in dark clothing. The witness saw Jennie's face, and thought they had just got off a horse-car. It was three o'clock in the afternoon. In the evening the witness saw Miss Cramer in her room ; she was standing ; the room was over the hotel office. It should be explained- that the window of Mrs. Klippstein's apartment overlooks the window of the room tjien occupied by Blanche Douglass. Miss Cramer was fixing her dress, and there was a lady with her, the same lady the witness saw with Walter Malley Friday, as related. About seven o'clock two gen- tlemen and a lady passed out of the hotel and up the street. She saw the same lady with Miss Cramer the Wednesday before this Thursday. Miss Douglass was near the window and Jennie was watching the people passing in the street. It was after six o'clock in the evening. Half of the blind of the room was open and the slats of the other were turned. The lace curtains were not covering the windows. Jennie, who was behind the blind, at one time dodged backward as though to avoid being seen. A little later the witness saw a gentleman in the room. Jenilie was preparing to go away. Mrs. William S. Crofut was questioned, and her statements were in cor- roboration of those of Mrs. Klippstein. She knew Jennie by sight. Saw her Wednesday. Saw the two women Thursday in front of the hotel about seven o'clock, and never saw Miss Cramer again. She saw Miss Douglass get into the buggy Friday evening and drive away with a gentleman. At this stage of the examination Walter and James Malley, who had been brought down from the jail, were sitting in front of the witness. She looked at Walter, and, without any hesitation, said, ' ' That is the man there. ' ' John B. Hubbellj living at Brewery and Chapel Streets, saw Jennie alive Thursday evening, August 4th, She was dressed in white, and the lady with her wore an old-gold basque. They were on the east side of Academy Street, by the lower Greene or Wooster Square, between Chapel Street and Home Place. The witness went to the drug-store of H. J. Sperry, at Chapel and Olive Streets, where Samuel JVIattoon is a clerk, and while talk- ing with a gentleman at the door saw Jennie and the other woman enter the store and have soda-water. The witness saw them go out and down Chapel Street. They turned and looked back, and then went on again. This was August 4th, before 6.30 or seven o'clock in the evening. The witness sup- posed, from descriptions, that the woman with Jennie was Miss Douglass. The testimony of Patrick Lynch is of special importance, as it is con- firmatory of the evidence given by Sanford and H. C, Allen heretofore given. This Lynch lives at No. 17 York Street and is a clerk for John H. 62 Dillon, a grocer at'Vernon Street and Congress Avenue. On Friday, August 5th, he was in Dillon's store until nine P.ii. He knew Jennie by sight, and was sure he saw her between three and six o'clock that Friday afternoon in a carriage with a man. He could not see much of the man except his hat, for he was on the off side ; the hat was a flat straw hat, with a blue ribbon. The witness caught a glimpse of the face of the man, but did not remember whether he had side whiskers. The witness said he had told that' he had seen* Jennie Cramer, and that he supposed James Malley was with her. He could not tell whether the man was old or young ; the carriage had red wheels. [This matter about the color of the wheels is interesting, because it is claimed that the buggy which Walter had was one with red running gear.] The horse was dark and medium-sized. They were driv- ing up Congress Avenue and turned into Howard Avenue, in the direction of the shore. The witness had only seen James Malley once and was not on speaking terms with Jennie Cramer, but saw her several times last win- ter. The witness was asked if, since he had first told what he had seen, he had received a postal card. He said he had, and produced it from his pocket. It was immediately captured by Coroner Bollman, and is believed to have written on it threats or other arguments' to prevent the witness from telling a straight story. The coroner had not seen this postal card before, and appeared to think he had secured a prize. The witness was asked if the Malley clerks had a picnic at his house on this Friday night, and the witness said that if they did he did not know it. He had one or two sisters employed in the Malley's store. " This," said Mr. Bollman, " may ex- plain the card." The witness now identified the hat worn by the prisoner, James Malley, as being like the one worn by the man he had seen in the carriage. David Evans, Jr., a printer, residing at No. 34 Kensington Street, said he knew James Malley by sight, but did not know Jennie Cramer. This witness was at the shore. West Haven, the Friday night before the body was found, He was there, also, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. On Friday night he was in the grove near the flying-horses. He saw a man whose face he thought he recognized, but was not sure until afterward, and thought it was Walter Malley. He wore a white straw hat and a polka dot band, and was standing near the flying-horses. The witness did not see him or any one he knew on the horses. The man had on a dark suit. The witness, after he had read about the finding of the body in the papers, was positive about the man. No one had ever pointed out Walter to him. Said the witness : " I suppose this one to be James [pointing to Walter] ; don't think I know that man [pointing to Jan^es] ; that is the man pointed out to me as James [indicating Walter]. I may be mistaken as to names." The witness ,said he had seen that man [James] up-stairs in the store be- hind a counter, but was not positive. In the grove a lady was near the man ; several ladies were there dressed in white. The witness did not know Michael W. Malley. The time of seeing the lady and man at the flying-horses was 8 or 8.30 o'clock in the evening. The witness would not positively say that this man [Walter] was the one at the flying-horses. Coroner Bollman called the name of Walter Malley and he took the stand with a composed air. ' ' Do you wish to say anything further or to correct any previous state- ments ?" asked Mr. Bollman. " I don't wish to say anything at present— no," was the deliberate answer. " What ?" said Mr. Bollman. The reply was the same as before. 63 " Mr. James Malley, Jr.," said Mr. Bollman. James took the stand without manifesting any signs (jf nervousness. " Do you desire to add anything to your testimony already given at this hearing on the Tuesday after the finding of the body, or to malie any changes !" " Don't know as I do at present." "That's all." ' John Hauser, the driver of a lager-beer wagon, told the jury that he had known James Malley a long time. Friday, August 5th, about 12:15 o'clock he was driving down Chapel Street ; his cousin, Charles Fleck, of New York, was with him on the front seat of the wagon. Coming through Tem- ple Street, across the green, he saw James Malley and a young lady dressed in white. He remarked to his cousin that there was James Malley, whose uncle was the proprietor of the store on the corner. The young lady he did not know, but he noticed the sickly look upon her face ; there was no " blush" on it — no red on the cheeks. Hauser positively identified James Malley as the man he saw, and described his clothing as other witnesses have described it before. His description of the attire of the young lady also corresponded with that given by others who have told what Jennie Cramer wore while with the Malley boys and the Douglass woman the week of her death. He admitted he had once refused to' answer Coroner Boll- man's questions about what he saw on that Friday. The reason was that he was busy and bothered. " There is nothing more now," said the coroner, " but the reports of the experts. Shall I read them ?" The jury was prepared to hear the written statements of Prof. Chitten- den and Dr. Prudden, and Mr. Bollman read them as follows : Sheffield Scientific School of Yale College, ) New Haven, September i, 1881. f To the Coroner's Jury, West Haven : I have made a careful chemical examination of various organs from the body of Jennie Cramer, and find, as the subjoined summary shows, consid- erable quantities of arsenic : Grains Arsenic. Stomach and esophagus 1580 Liver logo Kidneys 0290 Grains Arsenic. Heart 0280 Lungs 1146 Intestines 3140 Brain 0250 Total 7776 It is evident from these results that arsenic is contained in all parts of the body, and in such quantities as, under ordinary circumstances, would indicate a probably fatal dose. Respectfully yours, R. H. CHITTENDEN. Dr. Prudden's statement was as follows : At the post-mortem examination of the body of Jennie Cramer, August 8th, 1881, the following facts were discovered : There were no marks of violence over the general surface of the body. There were numerous small abrasions and scratches over the face and two- irregular wounds on the ^ lower lip, all of them probably made after or about the time of death. There was considerable congestion of the membranes of the brain ; brain otherwise normal. The lungs were healthy, contained no water, and were fairly well filled with air. . Heart healthy and contained but little blood. Small quantity of reddish fluid in both pleural cavities. The stomach was 64 healthy and contained a small quantity of partially digested food (huckle- berries, lean and fat meat, and mushrooms). The intestines were healthy. The uterus was bent forward and to one side. There was a small cystic tumor of the right ovary. The kidneys and spleen were healthy. There was at the time of the autopsy no marks of violence about the generative organs Concerning which definite conclusions could be drawn, owing to the advanced stage of decomposition in these parts. The blood was dark colored and but little clotted. . . . The post-mortem examination did not reveal the cause or manner of death. The appearance of the food in' the stomach would indicate that it had been taken within about eight hours of the time of death. T. MITCHELL PRUDDEN. The jury then went into executive session, and ^fter a deliberation of three hours and a half, decided upon the following verdict : The undersigned jurors, being duly impanelled and sworn to inquire of the cause and manner of the death of Jennie E. Cramer, late of New Haven, Conn., whose deaj:h was sudden and untimely, and the cause and manner of which was unknown, having viewed the body of said deceased and considered the evidence given us, do on our oaths say : That said Jennie E. Cramer came to her death by poison and violence and that James Malley,- Jr., of New Haven, Conn., is criminally responsible for her death. We also find that Walter E. Malley, of New Haven, Conn., and Blanche Douglass, of New York City, are morally responsible for the same. Whereof we subscribe our names. DURELL SHEPARD, M.D., Foreman. GEORGE R. KELSEY. HENRY W. PAINTER, M.D. ASAHEL CURTISS. S'. L. MARSDEN. JAMES H. PECK. The jury has held ten sessions and examined fifty witnesses. Prof. Chittenden declines to make any statement to the press. Other physicians say his report of finding nearly eight tenths of a grain dissemi- nated through the girl's system indicates that one, two, or more grains were swallowed. From one to four grains will cause death, according to the person taking the dose ; two or three grains is regarded as a very heavy, and almost invariably a fatal, dose. The large amount found in the intes- tines shows that the drug was taken not more than three or four hours pre- vious to death. Dr. Prudden's report shows the girl had recently eaten, and detectives for the State are trying to find out where the meal was had, but fruitlessly so far. The idea that the death of Jennie Cramer might have been due to a habit of eating arsenic is discredited by the authorities, who say that, in the first place, there was nothing but street rumor to indicate that she used the ar- ticle, while her family physician emphatically declares that she never had the habit ; and, in the second place, even if she used arsenic, with the be- lief it wotild improve her complexion, she would never have taken so large a dose as indicated by the report of the chemist of her own will. Said one of the officers engaged in the investigation : " The finding of eight tenths of a grain of arsenic in the organs examined means that there were two grains in her system absorbed by the tissues, etc. Suppose the boys knew of these rumors. One of them had been a scientific school student. Is it not possible that this particular poison was given to conceal a great crime ?" HV 653^ W5 a6 1881 Author The beautifiol victim of the Vol. Elm Title city. Copy