The American Society : for the Extension of University Teaching Syllabi of Courses English Literature Richard G. Moulton, A. M. of Cambridge Uiiiv«rsity, England (fimmll THE GIFT OF "" "'aa^ A.3fe3UW! 1% ;?u|.iS" 7583 CorneJI University Library PR 87.M92 Syllabi of courses on English literature 3 1924 013 356 948 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924013356948 UNIVERSITY EXTENSION LECTURES UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE EXTENSION OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING FOUR STUDIES IN SHAKESPEARE BY Richard G. Moulton, A. M. of Cambridge University, England 1 ' Macbeth ' — Does Shakespeare believe in Ghosts ? 2 The Character of Lady Macbeth 3 Macbeth as a Study of Degeneracy 4 Henry V as a Study of Development No. 12 A BOOKS Any edition of Shakespeare will serve if it has numbered lines. [The references in this Syllabus are to the numbering of the Globe Edition: Macmillan, $1.25.] EXERCISES Exercises on each lecture will be found below (page 12). Any person attending the lectures is invited to send written answers [to not more than two questions each week] : they should be addressed to Mr. Moulton at the Colonnade Hotel, Phila- delphia, and should arrive a clear forty-eight hours before the following lecture. Some signature, together with the name of the lecture-centre at which the exercise is to be returned, should be given at the top of the first page. They will be returned, with marginal comments, at the ' Class,' at which further explanations will be given on the general subject. All persons attending the lectures are invited to this Class, whether they have sent in exer- cises to the lecturer or not. Copyright i8gr by The American Society for the Extension of University Teaching THE SUPERNATURAL ELEMENT IN MACBETH Shakespeare introduces into his dramas supernatural agents and phenomena of a kind not usually recognized at the present day : such as Ghosts and Witchcraft, &c. The cliief plays are Macbeth, Hamlet, Richard III, Julius Ceesar. — The two plays, The Tempest and Midsummer Night's Dream, stand in a different class, as they are wholly divorced from reality. The question arises. How is this supernatural element to be regarded by the student of Shakespeare, in accordance with sound principles of analysis ? 1. Beware of the temptation to explain away the supernatural char- acter of such portions of Shakespeare's plays out of zeal for the poet's ' rationality ' — there may be scenes in which an apparition may be resolved into an hallucination (e.g. Macbeth 3.4, where no one sees the ghost except Macbeth) — but there are cases in which the appari- tions are unquestionably objective and supernatural (e.g. Witches in Macbeth, Ghost in first act oi Hamlet') — and a single example is suffi- cient to establish the assumption by Shakespeare of such supernatural phenomena for his dramatic world. 2. Shakespeare seems to assume for any story he presents whatever was believed in by the age to which the story belongs — but the poet is himself responsible for the interpretation underlying the story, in this case for the use made of the supernatural agency — thus the true ' rationalisation ' enquires how the operation of the supernatural element in a play harmonises with reason and morals. (i) The Beings of Evil have no power over man except by his own consent. ' Compare instruments of darkness ' (1.3.124). Macbeth has long harboured treacherous designs on the crown [1.7.47-59 : this must refer to a date anterior to the opening of the play] — connect with this his start and Banquo's surprise (1.3.51). In the second interposition of the Witches he forces them to speak [3.4.132-6; 4.1.50-61, 103-5]. This is further brought out by placing alongside of Macbeth the uncorrupted Banquo, subjected to the same temptation. [Compare 1.3 ; 2.1. 1-30; 3.1.1-72], 4 (z) Similarly, what the Witches reveal as Destiny confirms or assists, not alters, the natural working of events. E.g. Macbeth's succession to the crown depends upon a train of natural events, of which the most important is the flight of Duncan's sons (2.4.21-32). Macduff is the natural leader of an insurrection against Macbeth [compare 2.3.56 &c. ; 3.4.128; 4.1.74] — and as the most deeply wronged is bound to be the slayer of the tyrant [5.7.15 : and compare 4.3.111-4 with 4.3.201-40]. Banquo was a natural rival of Macbeth (3.1.50-7). 3. The main function of the supernatural element in a play is to add dramatic force to the working of events. By the interposition of the Witches the ' working of events ' takes the form of a ' destiny ' which appears (i) irresistible : Throughout, obstacles thrown in the way of the ' destiny ' become the means by which it is worked out. E.g. proclamation of Malcolm as heir apparent [1.4.38-42 : compare 1.4.48-53 with 1.3. 143-7] — flight of Duncan's sons [compare 2.3. 141 with 2.4.24-32] — oracle about Dunsinane castle leads Macbeth to shut himself in that castle, without which 5.4 would not have taken place. (2) dark and unintelligible, till explained by fulfilment : Of the two oracles pronounced by the Witches in 1.3, one is clear, the other mysterious — ^mystery drags on Macbeth (3.1.57-72) to a deed which at once explains and fulfils it. [Compare 3.1. 134; 3.4.20-31 ; 4.1.100-124.] (3) flavoured with personal mockery. The supernatural aids up to a certain point and then deserts : seeking unholy support finds a nemesis in losing it where most wanted. Effect of the Witches vanishing [1.3.78, and compeu-e 4.1.133]. The " honest trifles " principle (l. 3.122) : prying into forbidden knowledge finds a fitting nemesis in obtaining only half truths. The gods punish men by gi-anting their prayers. [Macbeth's Vision of King's in 4. 1 . ; especially note 103. — Compare in 3.4 apparition of Banquo in response to invitations.] To sum up : Macbeth was the actor in the scene of his destiny : did the Witches do more than turn the (coloured) footlights on it ? CHARACTERS OF MACBETH AND LADY MACBETH Traditional view : that Lady Macbeth is a virago, of a coarse nature that is the ruin of her nobler husband. — View here put, the reverse: that Macbeth's is the low nature, and that he seals the ruin of both, his wife only hindering him from adding weakness to crime. She exceeds her husband in guilt only in the sense that the higher nature falls with the greater fall. How is it possible for such opposite impressions to be left by the same poem ? The difference is made by catching a certain point of view, from which the play may be so regarded that all the details are focussed into harmony. Antithesis of the Practical and Inner Life For the play of Macbeth the point of view is the Antithesis of the Practical and Inner Life. [Compare Proverbs 16.32, the oracular response Nosce Teipsum, the Stoic use of ' King,' &c.] 1. Each of us has two lives : the outer one of action and intercourse with our fel- lowmen ('Doing') — the inner life in which oiu: reflection and energies are turned inwards upon our own self (' Being '). 2. This must not be confused with other antitheses : (a) ' worldly and religious ' [the inner life is the sphere of religion, but may be dominated by its opposite] — (i) ' practical and intellectual ' [all powers and faculties apply to both outer and inner life, though different in the two : e.g. discipline, experience, knowledge, especially (active and passive) courage]. 3. It is clear that a man's relation to these two lives will be a fundamental element in his ' character.' In a simple age, like that of the play, the natural tendency would be for genius in men to find scope in the Outer and Practical world, genius in women would be restricted to the Inner Life. [The same antithesis is a point of view for plays reflecting more complex ages : Julius Ccesat* and Hamlet.'] The Antithesis applied to Macbeth Thus Macbeth is essentially the Practical Man, the Man of Action — of the highest experience, power and energy in military and political command — accustomed to the closest connection between willing and doing. *The apolication ' of the antithesis to /alius Casar and Macbeth is worked out in my Shakes- peare as a Dramatic Artist. On the other hand he has given little thought to things transcen- dental — undisciplined and common-place in mental and moral reflec- tion — a mental crisis or moral problem afflicts him with the shock of an unfamiliar situation. 1. The lofty sentiments he expresses mean no more than a virtuous education — emphasised because he has no disposition to examine them : the practical man's distrust of wandering from the beaten track— no signs in him of real love of goodness founded on a deep affection or inteUigent choice. [Especially note : his wife's analysis of him (1.5. i6) confirmed by his own confession (1.4.51) — notice eminently practical nature of his soliloquy (1.7) — and see what changes his attitude in the subsequent dialogue (1.7 from 61).] 2. His spirits seem to rise with evil deeds [dagger soliloquy 2.1.33 — ^° 3'2.4o] — but in mental conflicts he shows an almost childish simplicity [2.2.29 ^°