o/^f aiatmll Httiocraita ffitbrarg 3tl)aca. Kem gark BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF HENRY W. SAGE 1891 Date Due r:>c - ■>*- ( . l': """' iM^-ii l^iiO .i ■' m I. asHSSB^KSS^?^^ W&-n 9-^98^- 3 CORNE 92' LL UNivERsrry 1 X 092 - LIE 5 JRA Y II 9 258 CANON BARNETT VOL. I ^UaT^ S yl.%ayrncU. urhc^ ho i/coa^mc "^^ardcrv of SToifnb-oc tHkil ^^A^Ju\V\UMJ\i (■^UiUrHt ''^^^■■ry pJurUrip-ufJu ■■■.n^.r^aklk^rpk-^ CANON BARNETT HIS LIFE, WORK, AND FRIENDS BY HIS WIFE ' Feae not to Sow bboausk op the Birds ' In Two Volumes, with Thirty-nine Illustrations VOL. I WITH SIXTEEN ILLUSTRATIONS LONDON JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET, W, 1918 t- '^/> Aix Bights Resketed PREFACE BY THE ARCHBISHOP OF YORK A RECORD of the life of Canon Barnett has been eagerly looked for not only by his friends but by the large number of naen and women whom his words and example have stimulated and inspired. There was only one person who could write this record. For the life which it presents was not a single life. It was, with a singularly beautiful com- munity of mind and spirit, shared, understood, interpreted, and sustained by his wife. Indeed Canon Barnett used to say, with a characteristic touch of humility, that he was but the mouthpiece of his wife and had the courage of her opinions. The words which he used in the introduction to one of their joint volumes on Practicable Socialism are true not only of that book but of the whole life of its authors. " Each essay is signed by the writer, but in every case they represent our common thought as all that has been done represents our common work." Yet this very fact has imposed upon Mrs, Barnett a task of very exceptional delicacy and difficulty. When she undertook to write the Life of her husband her intention was to follow the usual method, and give an account of his life, of his teach- ing, and of his public work. But the friends who saw the plan of the book counselled her to give frankly and fully the only picture which could be true to the reality, the picture of two lives united in efforts, principles, and aims. AH who knew Canon Barnett knew that this advice was right. But it is only due to the wider public^whom this vi PREFACE book will reach that it should understand why it must need be the presentation of a " marriage of true minds " and of an exceptionally perfect and fruitful comradeship. As one who owes to Canon Barnett the first impulse to the service of his fellow-men and who enjoyed his stimu- lating friendship for many years, I deem it a privilege to be allowed to write these words of preface and explanation. Times have changed since he died. We stand on the threshold of a new age. But the lessons in this book of single-hearted service for God and man are of abiding value. " Even now abideth faith, hope, and love ; but the greatest of these is love." Cosmo Ebor : THE PLAN OF THE BOOK By Mrs. S. A. Babnbtt, C.B.E. It is very difficult to write a biography, and especially if the writer loves the character that is to be shown to the world. What is to be given, what withheld ? Is the best to be revealed ? Is it too good ? Are faults to be told ? Mis- takes chronicled ? All through the time that this book has taken me to write, I have striven to bear in mind the standard of the greatest biographers of the Greatest Life. Those simple Galileans, in their eagerness to explain their Master, thought nothing too sacred to reveal, not even the fear of death nor the agony in the garden. They reported many a characteristic conversation, even if they got it from a suspected source, such as the woman of Samaria. They told of the depres- sions of fatigue, the mistaken judgment in a disciple's character, and of the error concerning a fact of natural history. But it is hard to follow this lofty standard when the hfe and the love are so closely bound up with oneself. Many times have I been tempted to keep his best only for myself ; but I have given of my gems, reahsing that it is not what a man does so much as what he is that helpa forward striving souls, and my husband's tenderest depths could only be known to his wife. I have therefore endeavoured to treat myself as a dramatist would, and, costly though it has been, to consider his wife as if she had not been myself. And when one is near the end of life, one feels that whatever the pain of publicity, it will soon be over, and then there will be left the evidences of the deep noble affection of a deep and noble character for his comrade, friend, and wife. Fearlessly therefore I have depicted him amid his father's dourness, his mother's love, his family's bourgeois ways and petty interests. With inten- tion I have dwelt on his early manhood, and given in full viii THE PLAN OF THE BOOK many of the letters of that period, because they show the young man as nothing else can do, and because from them can be gathered the capacity for growth which was so dis- tinctive a feature in my husband's nature. To him it was of no consequence by what channel the suggestion came, be it lovingly by the voice of a friend, or rudely from the impersonal press. As soon as he was shown a more excellent way, he immediately adopted it. Thus he grew more than anyone I have ever known, and this capacity for a changing sequence makes his biography very interesting. It could be said of him : " Rejoice that man is hurled From change to change unceasingly. His soul's wings never furled." The evidences of this power of growing are scattered aU over the book. It was the same man who at twenty-seven laid the poor drunken wretch on the floor of the van to travel for hours at the feet of the girl he loved, who became the courteous gentleman who never let his wife open the door for herself, and of whom one who had lived in Toynbee Hall for many years wrote that he had " unfailing beautiful manners." It was the same man who in early life disap- proved of illness and showed it by severity, whose presence in later years was eagerly looked for by the sick and dying. It was the same man who began his work among the poor with the sternest tenets of repressive rehef , who yet became the advocate for free breakfasts for all school children, gratuitous medical relief, and universal pensions. This power of growth made him provocatively puzzling, and also apparently inconsistent, an estimation which his enjoyment of paradoxes and epigrams accentuated. His temper was naturally of the sweetest, yet he was often surprisingly censorious. His sympathy was both imagina- tive and subtle, and yet he would harden his heart against the most piteous evidences of poverty, if his economic principles were involved. His generosity in big matters was sometimes reckless, and yet his parsimony in small ones could be both comic and annoying. His patience was part of his religious dependence on God, and yet it was united to rest- less ruthless energy for reform. His trust in human nature was all-embracing, yet no one investigated the statements of applicants more searchingly. His humility was one of the centres of his nature, and yet he assumed responsibilities and THE PLAN OP THE BOOK ix accepted positions which were hardly compatible with self-depreciation. His admiration for people was often exaggerated — and this must be remembered when his letters to me are read — yet it was joined to the most rigid criticism, and the refusal to be satisfied for everyone with any standard less than that of his " Christed self." He shrank from and disliked any dealings with occultism, but he possessed, and recognised, a rare capacity for pre- vision — for instance, I remember a walk at Antibes in the early seventies when he said: " The next health campaign will be an open-air cure. Night and day, winter and summer, patients will be kept with only roof shelter." At least twenty years ago, when war was far from men's thoughts, he said : " England will have to awake to an understanding of what her faith in Christianity means and then to fight for it." Many years before Marconi staggered the world by his discovery, my husband wrote : " Prayer may permeate an invisible medium and influence action, just as it may be found that electricity can permeate invisible ether and produce results." All these traits make a very interesting character, all the more because his whole being was dominated by Religion. He talked very little about it, and positively disliked abstract discussions on the unknowable ; but his normal attitude was one of worship of God, and Christ he felt to be his contem- porary. This was the key-note of his hfe ; and among the multitude of notes that went to make his music, it could always be heard by all who hstened, though its influence was more often felt than recognised. A very full life is difficult to depict because of the large quantity of material. To select, when all is interesting, needs the sympathy which tells not only what people want to know, but what they don't know they want. I have been helped by much kind advice. Bishop' Ryle hoped the story would be told as much as possible in my husband's " own words, for they were unstereotyped and often pregnant with thought." Mr. Alfred Spender bade me " soak " myself in Canon Barnett's writings, for " only thus could his biographer catch the unexpected originality of his ideas." Earl Grey, Dean Fremantle, Sir Edward Cook and many other friends begged that the Memoir should be a joint one of both our lives. The advice of all has been taken as far as it X THE PLAN OF THE BOOK has been possible. Indeed it has been the conscientious examination of the enormous masses of papers which has been partly responsible for the delay in the issue of these volumes. Unlike most biographies, Canon Barnett's life has been dealt with in subjects and not chronologically. I thought it would be uninteresting frequently to refer to matters, such as the Exhibition which occurred every year, or the Worship Hour which took place every week ; so I have gathered my husband's thought and action together, and tell each story straight through. The drawback to this pla,n is that when the history covers many years it has compelled events to be referred to before they have been mentioned. For instance, the Residents' work in connection with elementary education — chapter xxiii — is described before the initiation of Toynbee Hall is recorded — chapter xxiv ; and my husband's feeling on poverty problems when living among the rich — chapter xlvi — is related before his removal to Westminster is chronicled — chapter li. The plan has also necessitated chapters on the same subject in different parts of the book. The reUef of the degraded among our neighbours in Whitechapel, which is described in the first volume, was an entirely different matter from the charity questions that occupied Canon Barnett's thought thirty years later, and which have to be dealt with towards the end of the book. Of aU the subjects I found those on Relief and the Poor Law the most difficult to compress. The work itself was hard, intricate, and imceasing. Indeed there was rarely a day in our forty years' work together, when the claims of the poor or the hopes for the children did not take time and demand output of thought and feeling. The pens of neither of us were idle, and it is the exceptional number of Canon Barnett's articles that has made the selection so perplexing ; all the more as his methods of expression and terse state- ment of principles are worth reproducing. In the earUer part of the book, the chapter on Housing teUs of the destruction of the main part of St. Jude's parish during 1873-83. In the second volume, the chapters on the same subject include larger building schemes, and the story of the Hampstead Garden Suburb. The first Pension Committee was fomided the year we went to Whitechapel, to deal with the old in the parish. The second met the needs of those who had paid rates all their lives in the belief that they would receive out-rehef , THE PLAN OF THE BOOK xi and then found the system was abohshed. Later in my husband's life, as experience taught him, he urged that pensions should be given to everyone. Neither in 1873 nor 1877 was he ready for the conclusion he finally came to. Thus it has been necessary to mention pensions in two separate chapters, vui and xlvii. The two chapters on Entertainment might seem like repetition ; but the St. Jude's parties to teach self-respect to the degraded, and the Toynbee parties to break down class barriers, were quite different, even if both were aspects of the same principle. The descriptions of the life, first in the small Orphan Home, and later in the larger training and Convalescent Home, may seem redundant ; but these Homes made much of the backgroimd of our lives, and part of every week we lived in them. It is not my hope that all our friends will read the whole of this book. I caimot imagine, for instance, a learned judge, however deep his friendship for Canon Barnett, reading the girl chapters ; nor an erudite professor perusing those about school parties ; neither would even a friendly political economist tolerate the sketchiness of the chapters on relief or local government. But they may all like to see my husband's early efforts to obtain higher education ; and yet perhaps those chapters will be dull reading for the people who care only for housing reform, hbraries, art exhibitions, or holidays for town children. One of the advantages of the group method is the opportunity it gives for selection. The contents, index, and page headings have all been prepared to enable the reader to concentrate on those aspects of thought and action which specially appeal to him, or to skip those in which he finds no interest ; but in every chapter the personality of the Canon is revealed. I have made no effort to determine the relative import- ance of my husband's work. If he had done nothing else but what he accomplished in democratising higher teaching, or idealising elementary education, it would have been enough to stamp him as a leading educationalist ; but that branch of progressive endeavour was only one of his labours, and he could have taken a similar position in almost all the causes for which he worked. It has not been without design that some of the word- pictures are painted in the pre-Raphaelite style and others by the impressionist method. For example, I have written of xii THE PLAN OF THE BOOK the Toynbee Travellers' Club fully, and described the water famine in detail, not because the first was more important than kindred Toynbee Societies, or the second of special interest ; but because the reader is thus enabled to under- stand the work behind the other Tojnabee Societies, and can reaUse the strength of the union of the Warden, the Residents, and Associates in any of the other pubhc contests in which they were engaged. Behind the impressionist sketches he can supply the precision of the pre-Raphaelite details. Many tales are told of our parishioners, and I could tell very many more. Indeed I have had to be stern with myself or I should have written too much of the noble actions, the delicate honour, and the fine consideration of our Whitechapel neighbours. But I have forborne, because the object of this book is to try to tell of the char- acter and life of one man, and so the tales are only put in to paint the backgroimd of his life, or to illustrate some quality in his nature. The same principle has been acted on in relation to friends who made the joy and strength of our hves. Many are not mentioned at all, others only cursorily, even if their work deserved a whole book to describe it. The principle of selection has been to speak of those who abode to the end, showing by their steadfastness that their gift of friend- ship has not been transient. As we travelled a good deal, a short account of even the annual journeys would have absorbed too many pages, while to have printed all his. letters from abroad, unstereo- typed and attractive as they are, would have monopolised the book. So what I have done is to describe a few journeys at length and leave the others unmentioned. The Canon's letters, when not inserted in the chapters, have been collected into batches and pubUshed with no relation except that of date sequence. My husband was a prolific letter-writer, writing rapidly and rarely changing a word. His correspondence, which, besides those to other friends, includes fifty-two letters a year to Mr. and Mrs. Frank Barnett for thirty years, is very large ; and after many weeks spent in selecting which should be inserted, I am left with the sense that, I need not have spent so much labour, for those included are no better than the many hundreds that are perforce excluded. The interest in the mottoes consists in each one being THE PLAN OF THE BOOK xui written by Canon Barnett, and all of them contain the germ of the thought set out in the chapter. It has taken me four years to write this book, years'broken by sadness and frequent ill-health, occupied by much public work, and dimmed by the canopy of war. It has been written for my husband's friends, not only for those who are learned and have cultivated minds, but also for the uncounted number of humble people who loved and followed him. I hope I have depicted him truthfully, and not made him appear too good. Sometimes when I read biographies I put them down at the end, grateful that I have not known anyone quite so exemplary as the subject of the volume. In one of Canon Barnett's letters to me he said : " God be with you, God be in all who come near you to make them help you in what you want to do." It was a large blessing carrying with it great responsibihty for what I " want to do." For the production of these volumes the prayerful blessing has been obtained, and from the patient labours of Miss Marion Paterson, Mrs. Leon, and Miss Doris Davies real help has come. To them aU my thanks are joyfully rendered, and especially to the Rev. V. A. Boyle, who has devoted much thought to affectionate criticism, and many hours to verifying reports and clarifying memories. Indeed without his restraining encouragement the task would have seemed too big for me, and the fire secured my efforts. His service to the memoirs is but another evidence of the generous devotion he rendered to my husband during the eight years they worked together in Whitechapel : 1884-92. To all who care for progress I offer my book, fully con- scious that it is but an inadequate picture of one of God's servants, whose whole being was permeated by the sense of His Presence, and who, convinced that " God had made man in His own image," realised that the main duty of humanity was to raise itself to its birthright. Who by to love do apprehend to be." — E. B. BROwTsriNG. CONTENTS VOL. I CHAPTER I Birth of Samuel Augustus Bamett — His father, mother, brother, grand- father — Return of rents — Public apple trees — Great-great-grandfather — Action on slave labour — S. A. Bamett's childhood — Colour- blindness — Love of scenery — ^Move into Chfton — Pleasures of the grandparents' house — A scrap-book — Practical jokes — ^Mrs. T. H. Green — Education — The Rev. T. Hulme .... pp. 1-8 CHAPTER n Entered Wadham College, Oxford — View from his rooms — Worked toohard — Companions and pleasures — Bare sense of locaUty — ReUgious influence — Schools and degree — Tutored for two years — Visited America — Took Holy Orders — Mrs. F. A. Bamett — ^Mr. F. A. Bamett — Indolence a sin — Canon Rawnsley'a friendship .... pp. 0-17 CHAPTER in Social conditions in 1866 — High death-rate — ^Insanitary housing — Beggars — SuSering children — Inadequate doles — Charitable societies — St. Mary's, Bryanston Square — ^Dean Fremantle — Rev. A. S. W. Young ■ — ^Mr. Polyblank — Mr. Bamett's work in the Church — ^The schools — The club — The first C.O.S. Committee — Mrs. Bosanquet — Miss Octavia Hill — ^Mrs. Hill and her daughters . . pp. 18-33 CHAPTER IV Miss Octavia Hill's party- — ^Miss H. O. Rowland — St. Mary's parish organisation — ^Mr. Bamett's letters — Misleading mannerisms — Letters — Shyness of preaching — Importance of " being " — ^Parish visiting — ■ Mrs. Nassau Senior — An evening with the Comtists— -Conflicting duties — Unstinted trustfulness — ^The "future must begood " pp. 34-48 XV xvi CONTENTS CHAPTER V Mr. Bamett's letters — Exercise on the pronoun " I " — Christ fought alone — Betrothal — Respect for plans — Hohday in Switzerland — Deep reverent joy — Roughing it — " Shocking leveUers are the mists " — The Italian Lakes — Problems of helpfulness — The organ and its message ......... pp. 49-60 CHAPTER VI Miss Octavia's congratulations — Visits to picture-galleries — Mr. George Maodonald's party — Light-hearted teasing — Letters to Nottingham — Pet dogs — Refusal of an Oxfordshire incumbency — Views on iU- health — OiSer of St. Jude's — Acceptance of the charge — Hopes for the new life ........ pp. 61-70 CHAPTER Vn Wedding day — Visiting west-country cathedrals — Lodgings in Eldon Street — St. Jude's parish — Re-opening of the Church — Parish organisations — The spirit behind the actions — One aim, many methods ■ — Attendance at church — St. Jude's open all day — Small congrega- tions — Possible uses of the building — Sermons . . pp. 71-80 CHAPTER VIII St. Jude's Vicarage — A hohday in Switzerland — Visiting the parishioners — Relief of the poor — Angry applicants — Pain of refusing their demands — Injustice of careless relief — Call for service — Offer of friendship — Mr. and Mrs. James Stuart — Mr. and Mrs. Marshall — Pensions — Rev. Brooke Lambert — Proposal to live in Crown Court — Mr. Bamett's illness — ^Rev. Miles Atkinson . . . pp. 81-91 CHAPTER IX A Swiss walking tour — Oratorios in St. Jude's — Generosity of musicians — Musical services and their influence — Indignant remonstrance — Sunday concerts — Birth of the People's Concert Society — Lectures in Church — Failure to attract congregations — Children's religion — Mr. Edward Leonard — Gift of a policeman — Relations with the Force — Opening of the Imperial Institute — Parish machinery — ^Mothers' meetings — ^Miss Harriet Gardiner — Girls' night schools — Five parish agencies ...... pp. 92-103 CHAPTER X Co-operation of friends — Miss Marion Paterson — Miss Pauline Towusend — Miss Kate Potter — ^Mr. A. G. Crowder — ^Rev. S. A. Thompson Yates — Encouragement meetings — The Communicants' Society — Subjects for meditation — ^Thoughts on Holy Communion — Advent Sunday services — Invitations — Advent Sunday sermons — " My wife's tea- table" — ^The depth and dignity of friendship . . pp. 104-115 CONTENTS xvii CHAPTER XI Rough uncontrolled girls — Pages from the "Girl- Book" — Mr. Bamett's opinion of the work — Miss Townsend joined us — The Whitechapel Branch of the M.A.B.Y.S. — Methods of meeting — Evidences of gratitude — Parish organisations for young women — Girls' clubs — ■ Feeble-minded girls — Harrow Cottage — Mrs. Moore "Old Nurse" — First places — Letters from girls — Mr. Bamett's letters about, and to girls — Emigration to Australia .... pp. 116-128 CHAPTER XII Insanitary houses — Description of courts and alleys — Miss Octavia Hill's letters — Purchase of a court — A tenement block built — Choice of tenants — Acquisition of bad property — Lady rent-collectors — Necessity of re-building — Press assistance — Delay of municipal action — East London Dwellings Company — Visit of the Princess Alice — Inspection by Sir Richard Cross — Our daring purchase — New dwellings erected — Co-operative housing — Students' residences pp. 129-140 CHAPTER XIII Open spaces — The people throw stones — Baker's Row playground- Anonymous letters — Mr. Bamett's depression — Visits to his family — Friendship with his mother — Holidays in Scotland and Switzerland — Mr. Ernest Hart — Mrs. Alice M. Hart — Mr. B. F. C. Costelloe — Good talk — Descriptive letters . . . pp. 141-151 CHAPTER XIV Expenditure on parties justified — Parties in the Vicarage — Guests of all classes — Scanty set entertainment — Congregational parties — Religion underhes entertainment — Tenants' parties — Difficulties — Hosts' varied ideas — Article in The Cornhill — Danger of patronage — Value of courtesy — Invitations — Parties of the staff — Parties in the West End — Speeches to the guests — ^Wooden wedding . pp. 152-163 LETTERS, 1883—1885 pp. 164-176 CHAPTER XV Locum tenency in Cornwall — Genesis of the Children's Country Holiday Fund — Rapid growth of the plan — Miss Ruth Verney — Able secretaries — Large body of workers — Miss Finlay — Conferences — Annual Meet- ings — Out-of-sight helpers — Children's individuality — Miss Beatrice Chamberlaiu — Canon Bamett's hopes for C.C.H.F. — Chairmanship — Resignation — Nature Study scheme — Children's letters — Mr. F. Morris —Mrs. Harold Spender pp. 177-192 1—2 xviii CONTENTS CHAPTER XVI Fighting the " Angel " public-house — St. Augustine's, Stepney — The dust- deatructor — Fighting for free publication — Against Petticoat Lane Sunday Fair — Free marriages — Aldgate slaughter-houses — Unloving theology — The Liberal Association — Corporal punishment — Faith in mankind — The best for the lowest .... pp. 193-200 CHAPTER XVII Abolition of out-reUef — Difficulty of judging character — Bad effect of out-reUef — The care of the charitable — Intimate knowledge of the poor — After twenty years' experience — Valued friendships with appli- cants — Results of the abolition of out-reUef — Action much mis- understood — Young women in the worlihouse — Official recognition of voluntary efforts — Unwanted babies — " An incorrigible pauper " — Evidences of repentance — " The woman who was a sinner " pp. 201-213 CHAPTER XVIII Week-end visits — Dining-out — Dinner parties at home — Monday even- ings — Mr. William Morris's colour scheme for St. Jude's — Pictures in church — Need of beauty — A drin king-fountain — The new organ — The Shoeblacks' Brigade — The panel doctor plan anticipated — Flower shows — Mr. Leonard Monteflore — Rev. Brooke Lambert — Rev. and Mrs. Harry Jones — Bishop ElUcott — Holidays with friends ■ — Decision to winter in Egypt .... pp. 214-225 CHAPTER XIX Six months' holiday — First impressions of the East — Dancing Dervishes — A Reader in the Mosque — Mr. Herbert Spencer — Hotel du Nil — The Nile — Excursions — The Arab crew — Painting the cook — The Temple of Kamak — Letters to his mother — Mr. Spencer leaves us — Returns to us — Ascent of the Cataract Friendly teasing — Athletics at Philae — Mr. Spencer in Whitechapel . pp. 226-243 CHAPTER XX Quiet days — Efforts to share pleasures with his mother — The Second Cataract — Aboo Simbel — Our seventh wedding anniversary — Pur- chasing native handicraft — The Temple of Abydos — Professor Robertson Smith — Mr. and Mrs. Ernest Hart — The Pyramids — The Sphinx — Visit to All's house — Judge and Mrs. John Scott — The journey home — Co-operative educational travel . pp. 244-256 CONTENTS xix CHAPTER XXI Death of Mr. Bamett's mother — Letters to and about her — Illness of Mr. Bamett's father — Letters — Death of Mr. Bamett's father — Letters to friends who mourned — To one near the end — To some in difficulties — To a recluse — To a thief — About a confirmation candidate — Deep personal relations — " Took pains " for others — The morally deranged — The fraudulent — The dying — 1 he religiously perplexed pp. 257-271 CHAPTER XXII poster on " The Buried Life " — Services badly attended — Reason for the Church's failure — Bishop Walsham How — The Worship Hour — The thought underlying the services — The order of service papers — The prayers — The effect of the Worship Hour — Mr. Bamett's letters on the services — Opinions of others — New HjTnn-book — Worship Hours copied elsewhere — St. Jude-on-the-Hill, Hampstead Garden Suburb pp. 272-283 CHAPTER XXIII St. Jude's school buildings — Co-education — Schoolrooms decorated with pictures — Co-operation of parents — Parents assessed their own fees — Parents elect themselves as managers — Clay-modelling and carpenter- ing introduced — In consequence the grant withheld — Heading taught without books — Value of educational experiments — Church schools should be pioneers — Establishment of play class — Volunteers teach special subjects — Rambles — Evening classes in the afternoon — Religious teaching — Holy Communion with teachers — Teaching the Bible — Relations with School Board — Local managers — Education Reform League — Continuation schools — Continual school session — School journeys — Interchange of visits with continental children — Monster day treats — Camps for boys — Feeding school children — Technical education ...... pp. 284^301 CHAPTER XXIV Hard East London problems — Our first visit to Oxford — Friends at Oxford — Mr. Jowett — Letters about meetings — Mr. Arnold Toynbee — Oxford men visited Vv'hitechapel — Mr. Sidney Ball — " Barnett House," Oxford — Letter suggesting Settlements — Awakening of public conscience — Canon Scott Holland — Mr. Alfred Spender — The Archbishop of York — The founding of the Settlement — Decision to accept the Vv'ardenship — Objects of the Settlement — Naming the Settlement — Succession of Residents . . . piJ. 302-313 XX CONTENTS CHAPTER XXV Turchase of premises for the Settlement — Control by the Residents — "Grand" Committee — TaUcs in the Warden's study — Some criti- cisms on him — Growth of various activities — Mr. Charles Booth on one week's worli — Spirit underneath the work — The weight of responsibility — Residents on their work — Toynbee Hall a social laboratory — The "go" of Toynbee Hall — A day's work by the Warden — A week's work by the Warden . . . PP- 314-325 CHAPTER XXVI Adult classes — Toynbee Residents on classes — Diffictiltyof accommodation — Enthusiasm of teachers and taught — Voluntary teachers — Element- ary evening classes — ^University Extension — Co-ordination needed — Students fixed their fees — Examinations — Democratising the local centre — Technical education — Sunday morning lectures — Numbers decline — Tutorial classes started — Government inspection — Dr. R. D. Roberts and Mr. J. E. Monk — Hope for an East London University ... . ■ • ■ PP- 326-341 CHAPTER XXVII First pupil - teacher centre — Debates — Athletics — Mr. E. B. Sargant — Scholarships for pupil teachers — Honours gained by the scholars — Girl Pupil Teachers' Association — Twelve centres — Visits to the Universities — Termis tournaments — The Abbey and St. Paul's — Musical parties — The Magazine — Mr. BamettontheL.P.T. Association — The last of its meetings — Mr. Bamett's relations with teachers — ' — Elementary school masters in Oxford — Mr. J. Murray Macdonald — The Teachers' University Association — Toynbee HaU welcomes teachers — Canon Bamett's religious teaching . . pp. 342-355 CHAPTER XXVIII The Toynbee Societies — A list — The Natural History Society — ^The Anti- quarian Society — The Musical Societies — Self-government — Public service by the societies — The TojTibee Travellers' Club A week in Florence — Members' occupations — Mr. Bamett's letter on the journey — Subsequent tours of the T.T.C. — Dissolution of the club — • Workmen's Travelling Club — Saturday and Sunday public lectures — Mr. Preece first showed Marconi's wireless telegraphy — Smoking debates — Three typical evenings — Speakers and subjects — Students' Union — Lord Milner at its birth — Mrs. Winkworth' s party — TheGuild of Compassion — Some of its labours — The guests at the Hampstead Garden Suburb pp. 356-376 LETTERS, 1885—1889 pp. 377-392 CHIEF EVENTS IN THE LIFE OF SAMUEL AUGUSTUS BAENETT, M.A., D.C.L. BIETH . . . . OXFORD — WADHAM COLLEGE WINCHESTEE . February 8th, 1844. . 1862-1865. . 1866. VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1867. CURATE AT ST. MARY's, BRYANSTON SQUARE 1867-1873. MARRIAGE ..... VICAR OF ST. JUDE'S, WHITECHAPEL VISIT TO EGYPT .... WARDEN OF TOYNBEE HALL TOUR ROUND THE WORLD . CANON OF BRISTOL CURATE OF ST. JUDE'S, WHITECHAPEL CANON OF WESTMINSTBE SUB-DEAN OF WESTMINSTER DEATH ..... January 28th, 1873. 1873-1894. 1879-1880. 1884-1906. 1890-1891. 1893-1906. 1895-1898. 1906-1913. 1913. Juno 17th, 1913 LIST OF ILLUSTEATIONS VOL. I Rev. S. a. Baenett when he became Waeden of ToYNBEE Hall Frontispiece PAcma PAGE The view feom the window of Samttel A. Baenett's EOOMS IN WaDHAM COLLEGE, OXFORD ... 10 Rev. S. a. and Mrs. Baenett at the time of their Maeeiage, 1873 62 The windows of the homes of five families . . 68 A couET IN Whitbchapel and some of its childeen inhabitants . . . . . . .68 The Mosaic and Fountain on the west wall of St. Jude's Chuech, Commeecial Steeet, E. . .74 St. Jude's Chuech and Vicaeage, Commeecial St., Whitbchapel, 1873 74 The DEAwrNG-EOOM of St. Jude's Vicaeage . .110 Haeeow Cottage, Hampstbad 124 New Couet, Whitbchapel, 1873 .... 132 A GEOUP OF St. Jude's paeish woekees, 1892. . . 160 St. Jude's Chuech, Commeecial Steeet, Whitbchapel, AFTEE its EBN ovation . . . . .278 xxiv LIST OF ELLUSTBATIONS FACING PAGE Rev. S. a. and Mes. Baenett 304 ToYNBEE Hall, Whitechapel 316 > The east end oe the Toynbee Quad . . • 368 The Toynbee Libeaby ...... 368 CANON BARNETT HIS LIFE, WORK, AND FRIENDS CHAPTER I " Human nature is too big for its surroundings." A SMALL household was very happy on February 8th, 1844, for on the morning of that day to ]\ir. and Mrs. Francis Augustus Barnett a httle son had been born. He had been greatly desired and long waited for, and at last had come with an unusually big head and tiny hands and feet. A fidgety child with restless ways, and sweet smiles rapidly given in response to those who served or amused him. Many a time has his mother told me of her first-born child, and her fears that she would not rear him. But she did, thank God. He was christened Samuel Augustus, because for more than a hundred years there had been a Samuel Augustus in the Barnett famdy. He was born at 5, Port- land Square, Bristol, where the first few years of his fife were spent. The house, which stiU stands, is large and square, the windows overlooking the greenery of the central garden. The neighbourhood is now given over to business purposes, but it was then the heart of the residential quarter of the town. The father of the baby, Mr. Francis Augustus Barnett, had started a foundry which became specially noted for iron bedsteads, he having been the first person so to use iron. He was m. a large way of business, and when my duty as a member of the Departmental Committee on the Poor Law schools — 1894-5 — took me to workhouses and infirmaries, I often saw "Barnett" on the head of the old-fashioned massive iron bedsteads. Mr. F. A. Barnett's father, Mr. Samuel Augustus Barnett, was a timber merchant whose firm had existed for many generations. Mary, the glad mother of the baby, was the third daughter of Mr. and Mrs. 1 2 S. A. BAENETT'S GRANDFATHER Gilmore. She had been five years married, and was thirty- five years old when my husband was born. On July 3rd, 1846, another son was given to Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Barnett, called Francis after his father and Gilmore after his mother. From their earliest days the two brothers were bound together by the strong bonds of trust and affection, and all through their fives, until they were parted by death in March 1908, they wrote to each other every week, Saturday being the day for my husband's letter to Frank, and Monday's post rarely failing to bring his brother's reply. Mrs. Francis Barnett's father, Mr. Gilmore, was a ship- owner, his many vessels trading aU over the world, but chiefly to and from Austrafia. He was a rare and beautiful char- acter, and pleasant tales are told of his actions and per- sonafity. The family lived in a comfortable rambling house at the Hot WeUs, Cfifton, a gable of which stOl stands and can be seen from the balcony of Judge EUicott's house in Royal York Crescent. The garden was very large and was the scene of the happiest hours of Canon Barnett's child- hood. There, with the two dear old grandparents and the three maiden aunts who worshipped " Mary's boys," in the paddock and the orchard which ran almost to the edge of the river Avon were endless joys, from that of unstinted fruit-eating, to seeing " grandfather's ships " come up the river and through the basin into dock. The old gentleman was not only a kind large-hearted man, but evidently strong and self-contained, carrying out his own ideas before they were weakened by family discussions. More than once I have heard my husband tell how he, as a lad of nine, was present when his grandfather, entering the house, announced that he had had a most interesting afternoon. Questions as to the nature of its interest brought forth the statement that after making up the accounts of his house-property and ascertaining that he had made more than five per cent., he had determined to return all profits beyond that sum to his tenants, and had that afternoon personally undertaken the duty — an individual anticipation of co-partnership principles. Such a novel business procedure not un- naturaUy awakened discussion, but only one of the aunts, Aunt Anne, offered opposition as to the future adoption of the plan, for the whole family lived in an atmosphere of generosity and welcomed fresh methods of extencfing kind- nesses. Another tale of that period depi^cted the family ME. GILMORE AND SLAVERY 3 sitting in the garden at Ambrose House, and the two boys tearing off to the orchard on hearing unusual sounds. " What was the matter 1 " asked the grandfather on their return. " Some boys after the apples," the lads repUed. " Did they get any ? " " No ! we drove them away." " Then let us go and give them some," said the old gentleman. What a lesson in sharing, so simply given ! I think it lay behind my husband's understanding of the attitude of the boy who stole some apples during the fortnight's hoHday provided for him by the Children's Country Holiday Fund, alid who, on being rebuked, said he was sorry he had stolen but could he be told where the pubhc apple-trees were to be found ? Of my husband's great-great-grandfather on his 'mother's side it is told that he was engaged in a large and profitable c&TTjmg trade with the West Indies, but it being borne in on his conscience that slavery was wrong, he declined to benefit by the results of slave labour and refused his ships to convey the goods. He knew when he acted that his decision would not stop slavery nor prevent others from shipping the sugar, but his conscience was a matter between him and his God. So he took the step he counted right and saw the business sink and dwindle, instead of growing until it took its place among the millionaire shipping firms of great seaports, as his capital, capabihties, and integrity would have warranted. This decision is aU the more interesting because it was acted on before Wilberforce had aroused the pubhc conscience against slavery, and before Mrs. Harriet Beecher Stowe had — 1850 — in Uncle Tom's Cabin touched the hearts of all Enghsh-speaking people by the sorrows of our coloured relations. From their mother came aU the knowledge I have of the childhood of her sons. She told how they never quarrelled, that " Sarm," as she usually called him, with more than a suspicion of the Somerset di-awl, was dehcate, retiring, and tractable, but took both pride and dehght in his brother's love of mischief and greater physical vitality. They went together to a Httle boys' school, and my peaceable husband bore in his manhood's memory his secret joy at Frank's first school fight, and his thriUing interest in all the arrange- 4 COLOUR BLINDNESS ments for the surreptitious contest. Another of their childish escapades could never be forgotten, for the depleted Worcester and Crown Derby china sets still bear witness to a certain party afternoon when, told to be quiet, they both withdrew into an unusual and deUghtful " cubby-hole " made by the flap-table on which the tea and coffee cups had been set ready for the guests. To combine gently to push the two flaps back to the wall was a dehghtful game, tiU suddenly all the crockery fell off, and the account that " Father was very angry, but Mother seemed only frightened in case we were hurt," sums up a whole reahn of childish memories, from which the enwrapping and absorbing love of " Mother " was never absent. She also told me a story of having arranged that " the boys " should meet her after her drive to go to visit some fastidious relation, and her aimoyance at seeing her first- born in clothes none of which were in order or matched, from his socks to his untidy tie. She was vexed as she could not take him with her, but her rebuke brought out the fact that he was colour- bhnd and could not see the difference of tint or tone over which she was worried. Years of experience taught him more what to expect in colours, and that it was red in all its variations which he could not see. A regiment of scarlet-coated soldiers and the field they were crossing appeared to him all aUke, and his best tribute to my healthy appearance was — " You do look well, with lots of blue in your cheeks," or — • " You are jolly to-day ; your eyes and your cheeks match," words which conjure up a picture of a ■svife, to Hve cheer- fully with whom must have required on his part much spiritual affection. With his inability to see colour, it is strange that from his boyhood he was enthusiastic in his admiration of beautiful scenery. The family's walks and drives, the seaside resorts, and the journeys, were aU settled in accord- ance with what " the boys " wanted. Frank claimed some amusement and his brother demanded scenery, and so, Tenby, IKracombe, Lynton, Shanklin, Jersey, became weU known during the holiday weeks, and the horses took them to all the most beautiful spots round Clifton, Brockley Coombe, Portishead, Almondsbury, the woods above Weston, Dundry, and the hiUs and dales of the Mendips. Frank did not care for riding, for he was too near-sighted to make it safe, but my husband rode well and vigorously. CHILDISH RECOLLECTIONS 5 and one of the happiest memories of my engagement was the long rides we had together when he took me to see the lovely backgrounds of his bojdsh days. When the boys were respectively abont six and eight years old their father built two houses in Whiteladies Road, Chfton, then only a road leading into the country, now a busy tram-hned thoroughfare. These houses were called " Samber " and " Frankau," and into Samber House the family moved, thus enabhng the boys to enjoy, close to their own home, a real garden, the dehghts of which had only hitherto been known by visits to their grandfather's house. On March 8th, 1859, Mr. Gilmore died, aged 86, and soon after his old home was broken up. Of it one of the family wrote : It seems as though all the childish joys and experiences were focussed in that surrounding, always a background of indulgent aunts, "Uncle John " going to sea, " Uncle George " sending the tirst gold quartz from Austraha, the fruit picking, the birthday treats, the early daguerreotype photographs in which are shown grandparents, aunts, and grandchildren, aU give the impression of a happy and serene existence. — L. G. B. When Mr. Barnett was Vicar of St. Jude's, Whitechapel, he referred to these childish days : To F. G. B.— January 29th, 1881.— Last night— our wedding day — we had a Christmas tree in the schools, and we all made fools of ourselves for the children's pleasure. It was a grand party and you never saw such a tree ! I thought of our joy round the trees at grandfather's and wondered what and why it was, and if children had the same delight now. To F. O. 5.— Sunderland, April 15th, 1883.— Yesterday morning we went over a large ship-building yard. The noise on the hill above called up days long ago when we used to play in the field above grandfather's yard. What one would give for such days of simple pleasure now. The influence left by this household on thehves of the two lads was not only happy, but deep and permanent. " It used to be so in my grandfather's house " were words often on my husband's hps in reference to some generous or quixotic suggestion, and the tales of the sea-going ships, their captains, their crews, their warmly welcomed home- coming, and their prayerful outsending were evidences of the union of heart and labour that old Mr. Gilmore infused into his business relations, and that aU through their hves 6 BOYISH ESCAPADES affected the attitude that both brothers adopted concerning employer and employed. Among my valued possessions is an old scrap-book made by very small fingers and treasured by the mother. For my husband it was a rich storehouse of childish memories revived by quaint old prints of the favourite holiday haunts, wonderful valentines, and crude drawings. Of one bare page Ms mother told how it contained a picture which both the boys greatly admired. Frank frequently demanded that it should be coloured, a demand the elder brother steadily resisted, until one day when Frank was ill with some nursery complaint, the step was taken, the picture torn out, the finer shading and dehcate outlines smothered in greens and reds and blues and pinks, put on in a jumble by self- sacrificing fingers guided by colour-bhnd eyes, and the picture carried in dehght to Frank's bedside. Here the child was father to the man ; he always so enjoyed offering his sacrifices. Another tale of their early days shows the characters of both brothers, Frank's infectious dehght in boyish pranks and his brother's sympathetic co-operation. In one of their walks they met a donkey-cart on which sat an old market- woman fast asleep. Quietly to turn the patient beast and to set him on the way towards liis stable instead of tOT»-ards the town, was easily accomphshed amid the hushed laughter of both. But the continuation of the tale is that the joke perpetrated and enjoyed, my husband ran after the cart and once more set the sleeping dame on the road towards the market. All his hfe he appreciated practical jokes and mischief-loving boys, and enjoyed repeating stories such as the above even when they had no such kindly conclusion. Among them there was one when Frank, assisted by his mother, dressed up as an elderly lady and called as a patient on a doctor friend who had lately set up a practice at Chfton, and as he, Frank, was a very good actor and mimic, both the interview and the account of it became rich veins in the family mine of laughter. The first person whom my husband was ever conscious of admiring was Mrs. T. H. Green — then Charlotte Symonds — an admiration which continued to the end of his life. She was two or three years older than he was, and the elders had no acquaintance, but both famihes worshipped at the same church. Mr. Barnett has told me how he used to be allowed to stand on the seat so as to look over the high EDUCATION 7 pew and see the little girl. Mi-s. Green remembers those childish clays, for she wrote : The services were long, and I — the youngest of my family — used to watch those boys with great interest, and it was a pleasant surprise to me years after, in Mr. Jowett's house at BaUiol,to be introduced to Mr. Barnett and to recognise in this honoured person one of the " boys " I remembered seeing in Church. That the children were " spoilt," as the word is used, there can be no doubt, if to have every desire lovingly gratified is to spoil human character. The extraordinary prominence given by both parents to nice food and fruit could not have been a wholesome influence, but this was of less importance than their yielding to " the boys' " childish cUshke of going to school. That he had not been wisely educated was my husband's bitterest regret, and made him give much ungrudged time to consider the best means of education for individual characters. He had not even the advantage of being turned loose in a large library, for his father was mentally indolent, and though he had considerable intellectual capacity he would not exert himself either to read or select books for others to read. Thus until he was sixteen my husband hved at home, and studied intermittently under tutors. He passed the Cambridge Junior Local examination in December 1858, when he was nearly fifteen years old, and took the Senior papers two years later. He was often out of health, and being never free from doctors and the anxious care of his devoted mother, the ground was ploughed for the sowing of those seeds of nervousness which in later life we had to fight so strenuously or he would have become hypochondriacal . It was always his intention to take Holy Orders, and though he had very definite inchnations towards business, and was not indifferent to the claims of his father's iron- works as they grew in size and wealth, he never seriously re-considered his boyish plans. At sixteen he went as a weekly boarder to a crammer, and of that experience he had only painful memories. His fellow-students were young men who had either been expelled from school or had failed in one way or another, and from them the sensitive lad learned of evil from which he had hitherto been protected. Gentle as he was, I have heard him speak with disgust of the boys, and indignation at the highly paid tutor for his neglect of them, at the same time 8 AWAKENING BRAEN expressing regret that the methods of his own education had left him so capable of suffering by the talk of brutal and bullying boys. It was perhaps tiiis experience at the crammer's which may have caused his shrinking from any talk, however pure or necessary, on sex questions. At seventeen he went in preparation for Oxford for a year to the Rev. T. Hulme, in whom he found a strong and guiding mind, and in whose home hfe he joined and formed friendships which bore the wear of many years. Mr. Hulme' s influence on his pupil was intellectually stimulating, and his method the wise one of asking questions on facts and suggesting problems for thought. My husband always gave him the thanks due to one who had shown him how to work his brain, and had taught him that thinking was a pleasure. CHAPTER II " The mother with her gift of love lives longer than the father with his gift of bread, and her picture is the greatest picture in the world." On June 18th, 1862, Samuel Augustus Barnett's name was entered at Wadham College, and in the foUo^^ing September he went into residence. Of his three years at Oxford he always spoke with appreciation, though he regretted that for want of sympathetic guidance he had not used its opportunities to the full. It was only after much per- suasion that Mr. Francis Augustus Barnett allowed his son to go to the University, for he dreaded influences of which he had heard but vaguely, not being on terms of intimacy with the class whose sons unquestioningly go to College. To mitigate the horrors of free- thinking, he selected Wadham, because its Warden, Dr. Simmonds, was an unbending Tory and a rigid evangehcal, virtues which were not calculated to appeal to a young man who, mentally awakened, was questioning aU things. For Wadham College my husband felt a great affection, and much appreciated Miss Harrison's gift of a water-colour sketch showing the view from the windows of his attic rooms, which were on the northern side of the quadrangle looking north. The drawing is accurate, and from its minor details the present Warden of Wadham, Mr. Wells, our friend of many years, was able to locate which of the pair of rooms on that staircase had been occupied by my husband. The rooms themselves were furnished as nine out of every ten college diggings are furnished, with the remnants of the possessions of past occupants, but the pictures and embeUishments which generally speak of the taste and individuahty of the present tenant were in the case of my husband but few, though those few give illustrations of the dearth of his knowledge of, or interest in art, a side of life which afterwards became deeply important to him. His 1—3 9 10 "' ENTERED WADHAM COLLEGE pictures were some family portrait groups, two small prints of Landseer's stags, the College arms represented in appalling bead needlework, a photograph of the outside of Wadham College, and another of himself in uniform with other members of the Volunteer Rifle Corps. Of his work within those rooms I have not much written evidence, for my husband did not keep early papers and the few he did preserve throw but Uttle Ught on his mind. Of the life within those rooms I have often heard him say : " I made the mistake of using my time at Oxford to grind at books rather than to know men." " Culture comes by contact " was a favourite epigram, and probably his labours to bring men together, to found " Students' Unions," and to organise occasions for social intercourse, were the result of the reahsation of what he had lost from the lack of companionship of many minds at a time when his own was seeking the intellectual food that is best assimilated by the stimulus of talk. Just before my husband entered Wadham, there had been a set of distinguished undergraduates, Mr. Frederic Harrison, Dr. Bridges, and Mr. Richard Congreve, but the men who were in residence when he joined the college have made no mark on their time. Those with wliom he came into touch vv^ere either genuinely reUgious, holding prayer- meetings in each other's rooms, relating experiences of their inner life, and urging freshmen to accept their tenets and find salvation ; or else they had been reared in that school of thought and were eager to throw it off and escape from its trammels on their conduct ; while a third set were mediocre persons who neither thought, said, nor did any- thing of consequence. My husband had a great power of steadfast friendship, and for many years after our marriage we kept up relations with those uncongenial friends, but Whitechapel was not attractive to them. Face to face with our chosen life, they showed understanding neither of his character nor ideals, and one could only conclude that he had given them friendship out of the goodness of his heart, and that they followed him, partly as men do follow those they do not understand and yet wsh they did, and partly for the loaves and the fishes of his kindness and his mother's exuberant hospitahty. When my husband's father had agreed to his entering the University, it had been tacitly understood that his allowance of £200 a year should not be exceeded, and that The view tbom the windows of Samuel A. Baenett's rooms in Wadham College, Oxeord. r. 10] WALKS ROUND OXFORD 11 the period of three yeai's should not be extended. To keep these conditions the docile son, whose health was always weakly, cut down his expenditure to the injury of his digestion, and crammed the work for the Honour schools into three years instead of the usual four. He used to laugh in after-years, when we spent so much time at Oxford, di-awing word-pictures of himself with his head wrapped in wet towels, cups of strong and long-made tea standing by his side, his oak sported, wholly given up to examination work. " I was," he said, " what we in those days called a smug ! " He rowed a Uttle, being pleased when he was put in the " Torpids," an event which happened only, as he used to hasten to say, when the boat was in a bad way. His style was certainly both graceful and forcible, and one had mth him a feehng of enjoyable safetj^ because of his dex- terous handhng of the boat. He played fives, as later he played tennis, with a certain " ghb astuteness " which made up for strength, but his chief relaxation was walking. Early in the afternoon after a wickedly austere and indigestible lunch, he would start off for a walk, often alone but some- times with a friend, both wearing, if on a Sunday, their tall chimneypot hats, until the turnpike was reached, where they were left to be called for on the return journey. Very long and varied were these walks, fuU of minor adventures, the young undergraduate then utihsing a povv^er which he possessed of an innate consciousness of the points of the compass regardless of sun or stars. So unerring was this sixth sense that he unhesitatingly rehed on it, and part of the pleasure of those walks was to go far afield by the roads and then return across country to Oxford. In later years Professor Galton was greatly interested in this mental possession of my husband's. He tested it carefully and said he had only met one other man — Herschell — who had a similar well-defined capacity. He pressed my husband to explain if he arrived at his assurance by deduc- tion from data, but Mr. Barnett was unable to satisfy him, only asserting that he always knew by day or night which was north, south, east, or west, and that he guided his ways by that conviction. For daily purposes this faculty was not of much value, but in walking tours we always depended on it, and once when we were on the Nile, it was of use to the wider world. 12 SCHOOLS AND DEGREE Mr. Herbert Spencer, who was travelling with us, had gone for a soUtary walk and had struck out into the desert. We were sitting on deck chatting and sketching, when old Ali our dragoman came with frightened face and pointed out that the sun had become invisible because of a grey mist, and that the elderly gentleman had not come back, and that it would soon be dark. No time was lost in calling some of the men, saddling two asses, and following the direction taken by the truant philosopher. After a long search and much shouting, he was found, thoroughly fright- ened and greatly annoyed with himself, but tired enough grudgingly to accept the assistance of the ass. How grateful we were when, guided by this rare sense of location, my husband brought them all safely back to the dahabeeh out of the foggy desert and the danger of hyenas. Of the rehgious hfe of Mr. Barnett while he was at the University I have but httle information, but I know that he greatly dishked the undergraduates' prayer-meetings, feeUng that it was neither healthy nor modest to examine other people's souls nor to expose his own. That his faith was ahve and practical there is a proof in what one of the men who Uved on his staircase told me of my husband's tenderness to him when he was sore stricken by the suicide of his brother, and of the consolation he gave by the assur- ance of his behef in the immortahty and undying progress of the soul. Three years were soon over and in 1865 Samuel Augustus Barnett took his B.A. Degree, having obtained Second-class Honours in law and history, a School since abohshed. If ever he spoke of his Honours, it was with regretful contempt, saying he could have done so much better, had his tutors understood how to use his powers. He also thought that his attempt to put so much work into so short a time had prevented him from feehng the indirect and vitalising influences of the University, and that for want of wise guidance he had probably missed Oxford's greatest gift. Be that as it may, he was no doubt helped by his place in the Schools to obtain pupils, and for the next year he lived on at Oxford and supported himself, greatly enjoying the time for wider reading. Indeed, the experience of that year made him a persistent advocate of the provision of post-graduate courses, when individuahty had had time to assert itself and to recognise what it wanted to study. The following year was spent in Winchester as a master AMERICA— ORDINATION 13 at the College, where he was indeUbly impressed with the advantages and disadvantages of the Pubhc-school system, and with the strength of opinion in the boyish world, which strangled some characters and sustained others. The object of giving two years to teacliing was to save enough money to visit America, a hope that was reaUsed in 1867. He roughly mapped out his journey so as to include New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, Baltimore, Richmond, Charleston, Georgia, and New Orleans, and obtained some introductions, mainly to business people. The civil war was but recently over, and he came across many instances of the intense feehng which had been aroused by it. His own sympathies were with the north, but in spite of his inherited principles against slavery, he had always an apologetic appreciation of the dignified generous- hearted free-living ex-slave-owners of the Southern States. He WTote constantly to his mother — who unfor- tunately did not keep his letters — and spoke in later years ■fldth admiration of the silence with which she bore her anxiety when parting from him for so long and distant a journey, understanding, with the quickened sympathy of his manhood, what it must have meant to her who had hitherto kept him under her enshrouding wings. The net resiilt of his American experiences is summarised by Mr. W. Francis Aitkon, who in his book on Canon BarncH quotes him as saying — " Born and nurtured in an atmosphere of Toryism, what I saw and heard there knocked all the Toryism out of me." He returned to Bristol in 1867, and on December 22nd Samuel Augustus Barnett was ordained Deacon and entered on his work as Curate of St. Mary's, Bryanston Square, then under the charge of the Rev. W. H. Fremantle. The following year he took Priest's Orders at a service to which his mother's presence added a quiet joy. This seems a fitting time to describe my husband's father and mother, though as what is written includes my obser- vation of them, it is not hmited to this period of their lives. From her portraits, Mrs. Barnett could not have altered much, for her early ones show the lady I was introduced to when she was sixty years old, a short somewhat thickly made woman, with small twinkhng eyes, a long sallow face, a loosely set jaw, black hair, and a sweet firm mouth. She was undoubtedly plain in feature and form, untidy in 14 HIS MOTHER her dress, and homely in her ways, but all this one instantly forgot when she smiled. She seemed to radiate love and kindliness, generosity and hopefulness. She was shrewd in judgment and conjecture, rather positive in opinion, and persistent in pursuit of her plans, which were generally plans for helpfuhiess to be silently rendered to some seedy individual. She held with deUghtful inconsequence all sorts of inconsistent rehgious and social views, but they all had the same source, the deep well of her charity. " They may be wrong but they mean right," was her summing-up of many questions touching the family, the sociaJ circle, or the political world. She read the news- papers and followed the affairs of the day with keen interest, usually siding with the weak. She talked ineffectively and uninterestingly, but often made short suggestive remarks, and was a patient and sympathetic Ustener. She had a keen sense of a joke, but her stories were rarely successful because she laughed so much in the telling. She had no ambitions for anyone, least of aU for herseK, but she enjoyed pouring out lavish hospitahty on anyone who appreciated her boys. She was kind to her servants, Vv^ho never left her except to be married, and who received with other gifts one silver spoon for each year of service. She was a devoted daughter and a patient wife, but her heart's love was showered on her boys, and her lirst-born was the centre of her existence. For him she thought and planned and feared and prayed, her faith in him never faihng. Of my husband's father it is difficult to WTite. He was tall, well-made, and more than usually good-looking, with large and beautifully shaped eyes and regular features. He was extremely pleasant to look at, but was not easy to hve ^vith.. His assumption of his right to the best of everj^thing, be it food, the easiest seat in the carriage, or the only umbrella, and of its being the first, if not the sole duty of his wife, to serve him, was very trying to -witness, and I have often seeir my young husband turn away with a gesture of impatient self-control. " Why do you allow him to be so selfish ? " I indignantly said to Mrs. Barnett one daj' when he had kept her aird my husband, who was unwell, sitting in the carriage waiting in the noisiest city thoroughfare until he chose to come. " Ah ! my dear," she said, " it does not do to vex him, for it's what comes after," and I slowly learnt that what " came after " were long days of unbroken sulkiness, which HIS FATHER 15 hung like a pall over the household, stifling the very hfe out of the finer natures of his wife and sons. On the other hand, he had valuable virtues. He was a pure-minded and clean-hving man, punctihous in all financial matters, just to his Avork-people, but so cautious that he trusted no one and thus obtained the bad service given by the untrusted. He was also too perversely honourable to make improve- ments. For instance, he had always made the legs of the iron bedsteads soUd. When other manufacturers in- vented hollow legs Mr. Barnett refused to adopt them, thinking that it was not accorchng to the honourable con- duct of his business that legs should look sohd and be hollow. He Avas mentally clever enough to create a considerable business, but not morally clever enough to retain it, and during the last two decades of his hfe it slowly dwindled till it died away. He was supposed to be a staunch Conserva- tive, but his Conservatism consisted of gibes at the Liberals, whom he usually termed " those Radical fellows." He had no conception that his son held his pohtical views with any earnestness, or had left the party faith of his family as a duty and with regret, and generally treated his opinions as a subject for jokes. My husband always held indolence to be a moral sin of deep significance, and I have heard him both in private and in public speech use strong Avords on idleness, especially mental sloth : " Indolence is the devil," was an oft-repeated sentence of his. Probably his father's character helped him to this view, for Mr. F. A. Barnett was a transfigured person when he was interested enough to bestir himseK. During journeys this was particularly noticeable, and my husband's tales of what " Father " cUd and said when he took him as a boy of twelve to Ireland and they jaunted in cars from place to place were always pleasant and surprising. A journey to Paris when he was about seventeen with both parents, his brother, and two of his aunts, also provided occasions for remembrances of his father as an interested and pleasant companion ; and I recall long drives to Weston or Cheddar when the interest of the inns, the weather, the staying-power of the horses, or the obtaining of the best possible food, kept his inteUigence awake and amiable. It was the same thing with books. If he came across a book which took his fancy he would master it with self-forgetting thoroughness. Indeed, we have often used 16 HIS FATHER his knowledge of Dickens to try to rouse him from his dour gloom, and never in the tiniest incident was he found in error. He did not care for the pathetic part of the great noveUst's works, but every page of The Pickwick Papers and each joke of even the most subordinate character was known, enjoyed, and remembered. One could not wish his wife to have been less unselfish or less eager in her gifts of affectionate service, but had she made more demands on what was best in his nature, or not permitted unkindness to go unrebuked, different results might have been produced. Who can teU. ? But I think this belief was at the bottom of a quaint remark my husband made to many brides, " It is a wife's first duty to make her husband uncomfortable," leaving it where it was if no inquiry were made, but explaining to those who asked his meaning that the best wife was she who cared for the higher hfe of the dear one, which would probably result in making him uncomfortable. It would have been much better for old Mr. Barnett if people had had the courage to stand up to him, but no one did, except Canon Rawnsley, then an energetic pubhc- spirited dancing hard- working laughter-loving curate at St. Barnabas', Bristol. He was devoted to Mrs. Barnett, who made him welcome at aU hours of the day and night with a latchkey homeliness. One day at dessert Mr. Kawnsley had prepared an orange in an ingenious cuplike shape, and passed it round the table for distribution and admiration. " Ugh," grunted old Mr. Barnett, when it came to him, but too indolent to reach out his hand to pass it. " Won't you have some, sir ? " asked Mr. Rawnsley. " Ugh," was the only reply. " Well, sir ! put your bad temper in it and then pass it on," said Mr. Rawnsley, which so surprised his host that he obeyed! I dehghted in the audacious guest and his brightly given Christian message, and I have dehghted in him ever since. Of Mr. Barnett' s affection for his children I have no doubt, but he was content to allow it to be taken for granted, giving evidence of it only Avhen iUness threatened, or when their success aroused paternal pride. When I remember the old man's forbidding ways, and the frequent occasion of annoyance which he caused his family, I am moved by a discovery of his love for my husband. In a copy-book now lying before me, in his clear business hand is ^vlitten out his son's first sermon, the date, February 9th, 1867, FIRST SERMON 17 and the place, St. Mary's, Bryanston Square, where it was preached. How his father got it, my husband never knew. We found it among his papers after his death, and from various signs conckided it must have been written out from memory. In any case it e^dnced an affection and a capacity for devotion which, had it been known or shown, would have made the wife, the boys, and the father all happier and stronger to endure and progress. CHAPTER III " At every great crisis of history the most notable circumstance is the rise oj the human spirit — the coming of Christ." Without a clear recognition of the social conditions of 1866, Mr. Barnett's work or his ideals for those to whose service he then dedicated his Ufa cannot be understood. In 1851-60 the death-rate in England and Wales was :20-2 per 1,000 ; forty years later in 1891-1900 it was reduced to 18-2 ; figures which gain in significance when compared with 13-7 in 1914 and 6-68 in the Hampstead Garden Suburb. Among infants the mortahty had reached the enormous proportion of 154 per 1,000,^ and all observers agreed that the defective housing of the wage-earning class was the main cause. The Archdeacon of Coventry wrote : 1868. — The Sanitary Acts are only permissive and partial in their ad- ministration ; owners of wretched house-property defy interference and the o,uthorities are supine. . . Englishmen and Cliristian men tolerate schemes of festering corruption for both body and soul, where everj'thing tends to crush seK-respect, engender and facilitate vice, and to make a night's repose hideous and unholy ; where decency is outraged, shame unknown, and chastity impossible.^ Lord Shaftesbury, giving evidence before the Housing Commission of 1884, speaking of London in the sixties, said in reference to a district in Bermondsey : 1884. — It was a large swamp where a number of people lived, as they do in Holland, in houses built upon piles. . . So bad was the supply of water there that I have positively seen the women drop their buckets into the water over which they were living, and in which was deposited all the filth of the place, that being the only T\ater they had for every purpose of washing and drinking.^ 1 111 1914 the figure was 108 per 1,000, and in the Hampstead Garden Suburb the corresponding figure was 31 per 1,000. ' Social Work in London, by Helen Bosanquet, LL.D, 18 SOCIAL CONDITIONS IN 1866 19 March 2Srd, 1870. — Prom these mockeries of homes, wrote the " Parochial Critic," tens of thousands of mendicants march forth every morning — not to work or to seek work — but to beg ; not to contribute, by their industry, but to prey upon those who do. Nor were these beggars only the weak and incapable. The practice of transporting criminals had ceased some twenty years before the decade which is under our con- sideration, and Dr. Hawkesley stated the consequences : The number of depredators, offenders, and suspected persons at large in the Metropolis, including only those known to the police during the year 18G7, amounted to 8,964, while in 1868 they have mcreased to 10,343. In consequence of the discontinuance of transportation, 2,000 convicts are now annually turned loose on the community from our convict establish- ments, in addition to 100,000 criminals of all sorts from our gaols. No wonder that the police have found it necessary to circulate printed warnings to householders against the attempts of burglars.^ In a pamphlet entitled The Curse of Beggars Dr. Guy said : At every crossing an impudent urchin trails a dirty broom before us, and would fain lay upon us a tax. . . At short intervals we encounter the whining interruptions of the sturdy Irishman who is always starving, or of that odious girl who is for ever taking God's name in vain. . . Before our walk is halt finished we have run the gauntlet of ever}' form of pretended distress, and borne, as best we may, the fretting interruptions of every variety of ragged and dirty falsehood. ^ This is a shocking picture and its reverse side is even more painful, for to quote Mrs. Bosanquet : It cannot be doubted that beliind this mass of chronic pauperism, beggary and crime, there was an appalling amount of genuine misfortune and suffering. Not only the "widows and orphans needed help, but men and women broken down by sickness or unemploj'ment found their real needs overlooked in the clamour of mendicancy. . . The very existence of the degraded class was a standing insult and injury to the genuine worker, who shared its reputation for idleness and inefficiency, and was deprived by it of the succour which should have come to him in times of misfortune. On the effect of this confusion of ideas and acts on the hves of the normal unskilled worker Miss Octavia Hill wrote : February nth, 18G7. — It is the greediness of the recipient that is the anrful result at present ; and the helpless indolence of expectant selfish- ness. . . Let us give better things ; sympathy, friendship, intercourse, and then we can give with comparative impunity. For the hearts of people always feel the spiritual gift to be the greater if it be genuine at all. Social Work in Londo,-., by Helen Bosanquet, LL.D, 20 SUFFERING CHILDREN Where a material gift comes as a witness of real love, it is the love that is the all-absorbing thought, not the gift, be it ever so much needed. . . I cry out to myself in the courts every day, " What a frightful confusion of chances as to how or whether there is to be food or not ! " A man accepts underpaid work ; a little is scraped up by one child, a little begged by another ; a gigantic machinery of complicated charities relieves a man of half his responsibilities, not once and for all clearly and definitely, but help here and there. There is no certainty, no quiet, no order in his way of subsisting. And he has an innate sense that his most natural wants ought to be supplied if he works ; so he takes our gifts thanklessly ; and then we blame him or despise him for his alternate servility and ingratitude. And how, reared amid the smells of insanitary homes, surrounded by the roughs, the beggars, the workless, and the weakly, did the children fare in those days of fifty years ago ? Badly, very badly, and it was the sufi^ering of the children which provoked the deepest indignation among reformers and ultimately led to some remedies. " A little child shall lead them " became true. Dr. Stallard said : 1868. — The masters and mistresses of ragged schools declare that the children continually cry with hunger, and frequently fall exhausted from their seats for want of food, and that it is impossible to teach them in such a state. The out-rehef given by the Guardians was cruellj' inade- quate — as it stiU is — and though it is not possible at this distance of time to compute what numbers of metropoUtan children were " destitute of proper guardianship and exposed for the most part to the training of beggars and thieves," yet the Poor Law statistics show that " on January 1st, 1868, no less than 68,435 children under sixteen were on the books, and in the course of the half-year the number would be nearly treble.^ To remedy such evils, a few people were giving thought and time, and many people were giving doles, doles which insulted the receiver as well as condemned the giver, whose charity cost him nothing, not even the self-control of a passing emotion. Indeed so serious had become the action of " the frivolous pubUo . . . which supported the great army of beggars and made laziness and imposture more profitable than work," thereby creating pauperism, that in 1870 a Special Committee of the Social Science Association issued a report which urged the Government to take eog- 1 At that time the London School Board had not been created, and such education as existed was given by religious denominations, and by the philanthropic organisations which provided the schools so unfor- tunately called " Ragged," SOCIETIES FOR RELIEF 21 nisance of all relief to the poor. Dr. Guy went a step further and ^vrote : What educationalists have to do is to instruct (if they can be taught) the large dole-giving community, and to get them punished, as did our ancestors some centuries ago ; but, above all, to purge the nation ot the hj^ocrisy which sends the mendicant to prison, while for the great central vice of dole-giving it has only mild reproofs, or even gentle commendation.^ Added to the indiscriminate giving of individuals was the injurious and corrupting rehef provided by the Poor Law authorities, and charitable societies, offered with httle consideration for the effect on the character, or the future of the recipient. " Thieves' suppers " and " Prostitutes' meetings " were then considered as desirable and useful, and Sir Charles Trevelyan's wise words were resented as showing want of sympathy on his part. He wrote : We are doing aU we can to form the thieves and prostitutes into a class. Without such help they could not consist as a class, but must be brought face to face with the Poor Law and the police, and then there would be an end of them ^ — an optimistic opinion which has, alas ! not yet been justified. In a spirit of helpfulness many societies and agencies were estabhshed, among the most prominent being " The Society for the Rehef of Distress," founded in 1860 ; " The Metro- pohtan Visiting and Rehef Association," 1843; "The Strangers' Friend Society," 1785; "The Society for the Suppression of Mendicity," 1818 ; " The Parochial Mission Women Fund," 1860 ; " The Society for Improving the Con- dition of the Labouring Classes," 1844. Added to these large organisations, there arose many others connected with churches, chapels, and preaching centres, which in their turn distributed coal and bread tickets, and estab- lished soup kitchens, boot funds, shelters, and other channels of irregular rehef. All these societies pursued their respec- tive labours, sometimes obtained funds by exaggerated statements, and often relieved the same cases in ignorance of each other's action. The whole system, if it could be called a " system," was wasteful and ineffective, but its worst result was its evil influence on the poor, who were taught to beg, to prevaricate and to He about their circumstances, to avoid work as less profitable than cadging, and to count ' Social Worlc in London, by Helen Bosanquet, LL.D. 22 CURACY AT ST. MARY'S, BRYANSTON SQUARE the picking of the pockets of riclier people or societies as fair game, provided it was done, not by sMm fingers, but by words and whines which were not punishable offences. Incomplete as is this description of the social conditions of the time, it may yet indicate some of the problems which the new Curate had to face in St. Mary's, Bryanston Square, a parish whose residents were mainly the rich and the well-to-do, though there were quarters of it in- habited by casual labourers and the feckless, as well as streets occupied by the self-respecting industrial classes. Ml'. Barnett's hfe for the next five years is best told in the v/ords of three of his contemporaries who have remained our faithful friends even until now. His Rector, the Rev. the Hon. W. H. Fremantle — later the Dean of Ripon — the Rev. A. S. W. Young, his colleague at St. Mary's — now the Vicar of Kingston — and Mr. W. Poly blank, then the second master of St. Mary's schools — laow enjoying his well- deserved repose in Devonshire. Their reminiscences of his work group themselves under four heads : (1) The Church, (2) The Schools, {'.i) The Rehef Committee, (4) The Club. The Rector wrote : Barnett came to me by the advice of a liberally minded clergyman in his native Bristol . . . and asked to have a sort of apprenticeship in my parish in preparation for ordination. I gladly offered to let him come as a lay helper and promised to give him help in his studies. . . He prepared the books which were the subjects for examination for ordination very carefuUy and with equal reverence and criticism. He was very diligent and dutiful in all ways, but had not at that time developed the special and original gifts which afterwards produced such wide-reaching fruits. He was always Uberal in thought and act, his heart was with the poor, and he sought their good, but his larger activities which made him famous were at most in an inchoate condition. . . He used to say in a humorous manner that I had made him a Radical by taking him into the company of some advanced Liberals, but I do not laiow precisely to what he alluded. We rarely, if at all, spoke of the politics of the day, but I was very early convinced that the Church of England meant the whole nation uniting in aU its parts as a Christian body, and that the attempts to narrow it must be combated. If this is Radicalism, then both he and I were Radicals to the core. Mr. Young wrote : My acquaintance with your husband began in October 1868. . . We came together at once. I soon found that he had more to give to me than I to him ; but I may say I believe, without presumption, that to find in .me, as he did, an interested and sympathetic listener to the ideas which REV. A. S. W. YOUNG 23 "were stirring and seetliing in his brain, was a real help to him. We were differently moulded ; his thoughts ran more upon Sociology, mine uj^on Theology ; but we were both alive to the connection and later- dependence of the two. I do not think either of us had read much at that time. liohertsoii' s Sermons was the first book mentioned between us. They had taken great hold on me, and I was glad to find that he thought there were none like them. He was also greatly attracted by Carlyle. . . One frequently met men in Barnett's rooms. This dropping in upon him, without notice and often for a long talk, was a practice that I have thought since he must often have felt an inconvenient one. But he never gave any sign of it : one seemed always welcome, no matter what he was about. I am afraid I was most unscrupulous in the use I made of the privilege. He knew my knock and almost always opened the door himself. Another only less frequent visitor was the Vicar of St. Luke's, Nutford Place, the Rev. T. W. Fowle. He was some years older than either of us, but not too old to assort well ; a very able thinker and expresser of his thoughts ; of sparkhng wit and eager temperament ; as high-spirited as a boy, but withal, rather easily cast down. He threw himself eagerly upon our friendship, and made us feel that he dehghted in it, as we did in his. He was full of the thoughts of the day, Darwin and evolution, Huxley, Herbert Spencer. He proposed to read Philosophy together, and we took up Descartes, and then Locke, meeting in 34, Upper Montague Street, your husband's rooms, and constantly sitting into the small hours a.m. A most happy trio we were, our types of mind very ditlerent, but on the broad common basis of hberal thought and earnest inquiry into the truth of things we formed a really good combination. nodes caenaeque Deum. Those symposia will always be among my most cherished memories. Alas ! that they remain now with me alone. Nor should I forget the Sunday evening suppers with our Rector, and the opportunities they gave for talking over the parochial machinery and the broaching of new ideas ; when, whether reviewing what had been or sug- gesting what would be done, Bamett was sure to have something interesting to say. But neither then nor at any other time did he ever obtrude himself, or say anythmg but with the modesty that became his position as junior curate. He spoke always as one who would rather have his thoughts drawn from him than volunteered. Mr. Fremantle liked nothing better than getting people together to talk, and he held a meeting for Bible study at his house once a month for the clergy of all the chstrict of which St. Jlary's was the Mother Church — Francis, HoUand of Quebec Chapel ; Fowle of St. Luke's; Geary of St. Thomas', Portman Square, with their curates ; and I may say for myself and for my colleague I think, that we owed much of the clearance of our ideas to those meetings. One morning our Rector asked us to meet the Master of BaUiol. To an Oxford man, as your husband was, he would have been already a familiar figure, but I believe this was his first real introduction to him. Of the fruitful intercourse that sprang up afterwards between them, I need say nothing at all to you, but as I am dealing with the beginnings of the great things in his life, it would be an omission not to mention that httle breakfast party. Something of what my husband felt for Mr. Young will 24 DEAN FREMANTLE be gathered from the following words written fifteen years after they had ceased to be fellow-curates : December 22nd, 1888. — We go down to Kingston to-night, and to-morrow I preach for Young. It will be pleasant to see him. He is one of the best of men and his friendship means rest. Mr. Polyblank was an assistant master in the church schools, and the gUmpses he gives of the personality of the young Curate add touches to the character we are considering. He wrote : It was the charm and warmth with which he received and introduced me at St. Mary's Boys' School that inspired me . . . and it was out of respect and love for him that my first class of fifty troublesome London boys received me (a very young raw countryman) with submission and obedience. . . . He used to say, "The best thing to give is your heart." He keenly felt the unkindness of anyone who deceived or failed him, and that he met many of these human failures goes without saying, yet his largeness of heart would not allow him to drop or condemn any as utterly bad. One of two such human failures that 1 knew at St. Slary's, remarked on Mr. Bamett, that he was " humanity personified." The impressions of these friends who saw my husband's first service in the Church are to me very interesting, for people rarely reahse his love for, and faith in, the work of the Church. His efforts for social reform in Whitechapel were brought more prominently before the pubhc than his rehgious work, but rehgion held the main place in his heart's core, though his acceptance of Miss Octavia Hill's dictum of " the nearer, the dearer, the severer " made him very conscious, and often impatient, of the faults of organised rehgion and ever anxious to reform the Church. Dean Fremantle wrote : Bamett took much pains in his Church work, though he was not a great preacher. . . I remember in a conversation which we had about preach- ing, an expression of his that the ordmary religious teaching was too much " a religion of death," and that what was needed was " a religion of life." Mr. Young's memories were more personal : I wiU speak now of your husband as I remember him in the Church. As the curates, the burden of preaching that was laid upon us was a very light one, one sermon a fortnight being our regular portion. Thus we had ample time to prepare, and we both took conscientious pains. He expressed himself in the pulpit vigorously, in emphatic, short sentences, never with- out real thought of his own. If there were some who found him difficult to foUow, it was not from any obscurity in the language he used, for that was most simple, but from the thought not corresponding to what they had SERMONS 25 in their minds, and from, I should say, a little want of the art, on his part, of throwing himself into their thoughts and translating them into his. The sermons were always fully written out. He could not at that time speak fluently. He gained help ui this, I think, from the institution by our Rector of a short daily service at S a.m. As a formally composed address would have been inappropriate to the occasion, it was understood that we should confine ourselves to simple comments upon one of the Lessons for the day. Thus we got some practice in extemporaneous expression, at the expense only of the faithful few who were minded to attend at that early hour. My own recollections bear out Mr. Yomig's words, for I was among those who found his sermons out of touch with life and " difficult to follow," and I remember — long before our engagement — making a vigorous protest to him against wasting liis opportunities of speaking to the people whose Kves he knew so well, and of whose need for spiritual food he was aware. The patient meekness with which he took my criticism is still in my memory, as well as his explanation that his sermons represented the line of thought he was then considering, which brought the obvious retort that it would be more useful to the congregation for their minister to talk about the hne of thought which they were then considering, and to bring it to the test of Christ's standard. It was strange that, desirous as he was of uniting men through the Church, his sermons should be so often academic and impersonal, for even in his curate days he held that the Church sho\ild be the centre of life, that all men should be counted as belonging to it, and that its teaching should permeate every department of action. In his recollections Dean Fremantle said : I know that Bamett agreed with me in considering each person in the parish as a member of the Church of England and as a feUow-worker in the carrying out of the high ideal for which the Church exists. Mrs. Barnett's excellent little book Worship and Work shows this in every page. Of Mr. Barnett's work in the schools Mr. Young wrote : He made a deep impression by his vi'ork in the school. The boys were his province ; the girls mine. He might well have been content with giving Scripture lessons, but he must needs take up some other subject with the boys as well ; and his history class became a noted feature. The teachers were all devoted to him and were always delighted to see him come in. His presence was an inspiration, and thrilled all the school with life and zeal. At his instance we held an amateur inspection of our own once a year, with the hearty goodwill of the teachers, who might have resented it, an examination to test the children's powers of thought and to bring out what was in their minds. 1—4 26 MR. W. POLYBLANK The preparation of the boys for Confirmation fell to his share ; and it was not Umited to teaching them. It was a matter of close personal inter- course, and I often found one or two in his rooms. With raany of them he was the object of an abiding attachment, and I remember hearing from them that they had looked him up in Whitechapel, and what a pleasure it had been to both.^ To this account the Dean added his testimony : Bamett took a great interest in the schools, and being a History Scholar at Oxford, interested the older boys in that subject. I was present at a class of his on the History of England in the time of James II. and the Revolution, and remarked how much more interesting and more religious it was than a class on Old Testament History at which I had assisted. This is interesting, for it tells indirectly of the beautiful relation existing between the Rector and the Curate, a relation which grew into a friendship both warm and deep. In Mr. Polyblank's memory, the recollections of Mr. Bar- nett's opinions on school matters and of his influence on the children are both vivid and detailed : As an educational progressive Mr. Barnett was very dissatisfied with the Government restrictions and the teaclimg. The children learnt, but were not educated, their powers of reasoning were cramped. . . The Evening Schools for older boys were uninteresting and the teaching of the three R's failed to attract and hold the lads. The lessons were arranged for grant-earning purposes and the textbooks were patchy and only short cuts to facts. . . But Mr. Barnett was fearless in attacking faults. Tlie want of power to alter or get remedied much of the above was very vexatious to him, and led to many argumentarj' and almost angry discussions with H.M. Inspectors. Mr. Young wrote : Barnett had a Club P^oom for working men in a squahd slum, and it became a notable centre of his work. It was situated in Walmer Street, which turned out of a narrow thoroughfare and ended in a cul-de-sac. ' Up to the end of his life some of the St. Mary's boys remained my husband's friends, bringing their children to see us, and rarely missing the Abbey services when he preached. Sometimes gifts would arrive with notes such as the following : December 31, 1884. — From three of your " old boys," who often think of you and pray God bless you. C. W. HoNYCHUKCH, George S. Hunt, J. Phillips. Twenty-seven years after Canon Bamett had left St. Mary's, he wrote : Whitechapel, October I4th, 1899. — I preached last Sunday at Bryanston Square. It was good to be back in the old memories, and to shalie liands with some who had not forgotten. THE MEN'S CLUB 27 , . . The houses were badly built and badly kept, the people of the poorest sort. A house was taken there and the two rooms on the lower floor thrown into one. This formed the L'lub Room. It held about twenty men and there were no conditions of membership. Subject to the limita- tions of space it was open to anj'one every evening. Just a place where thej' could sit and talk, with a table or two for draughts, dominoes, or chess if they hked to learn it. That was all, no cards, no drink. Here he was to be found on the greater number of evenings every week, tlie centre of attraction to those who gathered there to hear him talk and to be drawn out by him. . . One was pretty sure to see a group, whatever evening one dropped in, in close intercourse with the master mind. Some characters amongst them 1 shall never now forget. One, older than the rest, held a kind of authority which all seemed to own, of sober judgment and the power of quiet utterance ; another, a keen, irrepressible young Irishman, made no secret of his anti-English sentiments ; a third, of the same blood as he, silent and broochng, probably one of tire dynamite conspirators. Both these two were certainly Fenians. The talk was never frivolous ; it was turned naturally upon the political, social, and industrial topics of the day. V7e lieard much of the Hyde Park riots — hov/ easy it liad been to pull the raihngs down — of Gladstone, Bright, Beales, Odger ; of the Gas Stokers' strike, etc., etc. One evening was set apart for a regular discussion — a " ba.te " [debate] as they were pleased to call it ; sometimes he would read or lecture to them ; now and then would introduce others to talk to them, or to gain information for their own minds about those of working-men. To trace the beginnings of great movements is always difficult, but as St. Mary's parish was the home of the first Charity Organisation Committee and as Miss Octavia Hill, Mr. Fremantle, and my husband were closely con- cerned with its inception, it seems necessary to give a short account of the existing parochial machinery for rehef previous to its advent. Mr. Young's account is : Before the C.O.S. came upon the scene, the admuiistration of Charity consisted of Uttle else than the distribution of doles. In our parish there was an attempt at organisation made by the mstitution of a paid Almoner, and there were weekly meetings held, but practically the administration came into Earnett's hands, and the meeting did little but endorse his actions and recommendations. The notable meeting which led to the formation of the first local Committee of the C.O.S. Miss Octavia Hill re- ferred to in these words : 18G9. — We are having a large meeting m the parish this week to try to organise the rehef given ; very opposite creeds will be represented — Archbishop Manning, Mr. Llewellyn jOavies, Mr. Fremantle, Mr. Eardley WUmot, and others. . . Mr. Fremantle, the Rector of our district, and the main mover in the matter, is to call on me to-day. May some power inspire me with intellect and speech ! I have hardly a hope that they wUl 28 THE FIRST C.O.S. COMMITTEE place me on the Committee. 1 shall try boldly, but I thiak no ladies will be admitted. But this last fear was not justified, for to the Committee was added Miss Octa via— October 1869 — who in her turn proposed me, and thus I had tlie privilege of working almost daily with her and knowing the Charity Organisation Society from its very birth. The desperate need of such an organ- isation is so admirably summed up by Mrs. Bosanquet that I cannot do better than quote the paragraph intact : This was the situation in London at the end of the sixties. On the one hand a confused mass of poverty, crime and mendicancy, living side by side with the independent wage-earners under conditions of overcrowding and insanitation, and baffling all the eiiorts of authority and benevolence, " The magistrates of the metropolis, one after another, expressed despair and hopelessness in presence of the clamorous crowds that beset their offices from day to day." On the other hand, a Poor Law administered so as to aggravate the evil, and a host of philanthropic societies and individuals confused and helpless before the magnitude of the demands made upon them. Those actually engaged in relief work were unable " to see the wood for the trees " ; absorbed in the importunate claims upon their own time and resources, they knew and cared little for what otliers were doing ; and while a united effort might have checked the rising tide of pauperism and mendicancy, there was no one to marshal their forces and bring order into their campaign. To those who were studying the question the need was clear, the means of meeting it less obvious. The associations before which they expressed their convictions had not the organisation which would have enabled them to give effect to their ideas ; they were not in touch with the thousand and one agencies to be iniiuenced, they had no standing in the poorer quarters where, if at all, the evils must be met and overcome. Some new agency was needed to bring together the thinkers and the workers, to show how principles might be applied in action, to give effect to theories, and to turn schemes into working plans. That "new agency" was the Charity Organisation Society, usually called the C.O.S. Of it Mr. Young wrote : From the first Barnett took a most active part in this reform, and it was in connection with it that his friendship with Miss Octa via Hill began. She offered herself as a worker to Mr. Fremantle, who very cordially accepted her ideas. She soon discovered where they would be most appreciated, and in your husband found a thoroughly congenial mind. Upon him the effect of her coming was to cause him partially to throw off the reserve which his modesty had imposed upon him, and together they became the driving wheels of Charity Reform in our parish. About the same time our Rector established a Parish Council, elected by popular vote, which he entrusted with a large control over the arrangements both of Church and parish. . . The plan of procedure, which took a great deal of time and thought, was entirely the work of the two brains whose authority on the subject of relief we all instinctively recognised. . . But it was not aU plain saibng. There was a great deal of prejudice to be overcome, and nothing was more difficult to deal with MISS OCTAVIA HILL 29 than the soft-hearteduess which could see nothing but hard-heartedneas ill the refusals to give. One old gentleman I remember who sat at the end of the table, and therefore next to the appUcants, slipped a sixpence under the corner of it into a poor woman's hand, as Miss Hill was pointing out to her the reasons why we could not give her monej', and offering her the soundest advice. The old gentleman was afterwards called to account by your husband and melted into tears for his own delinquency ! This will serve to illustrate the relations between him and the old-fashioned people of whom there were a great many in the parish. They did not understand the working of his mind, and showed Little sympathy with his ideals. They did not, I think, particularly like his preaching. But there was no one who was not strucls; by his obvious sincerity and earnestness, and who did not admire his intense devotion to his work. If there ■n'ere not many who sought his intimate friendship, there were none with whom he was not on perfectly friendly terms. The profotind influence which Miss Octavia Hill had on Mr. Barnett it is impossible to describe. She came to him as a new revelation of womanly potentiahties, for which his dear mother and the women he had known at Bristol had given him no indication. The Archdeacon of Durham, himself a friend of my husband in those early days, has written : I knew Bamett's father, mother, and brother, and doubt whether they contributed much to his work. Truth to say it was the Octavia HQl circle and you, to him the chief factor in it, who made the man, touching him with a new and higher life. And who, kno-s^ing Miss Octavia, could wonder that her noble influence awakened minds and hearts ? For others who did not know her, it will be helpful to recall the temper of those who flung coppers to beggars and complained that their presence spoiled the pleasure of their walks, and to reahse the wooden thought of the official which treated sufferers as " cases " to be reheved at the minimum expen- diture of time and money ; and then to contrast both with the words and thoughts put forth in a paper read by Miss Octavia before the Social Science Association in 1869. She said : Alleviation of distress may be systematically arranged by a society ; but I am satisfied that, without strong personal influence, no radical cure of those who have fallen low can be effected. Gifts may be pretty fairly distributed by a Committee, though they lose halt their graciousness ; but, if we are to place our people in permanently self-supporting positions, it wiU depend on the various courses of action suitable to various people and circumstances, the ground of which can be perceived only by sweet subtle human sympathy, and power of human love. . . By knowledge of character more is meant than whether a man is a drunkard or a woman ii? dishonest ; it means knowledge of the passions , 30 MISS OCTAVIA HILL hopes, and history of people ; where the temptation will touch them, what is the little scheme they have made of their own lives, or would make, if they had encouragement ; what training long-past phases of their lives may have afforded ; how to move, touch, teach them. Our memories and our hopes are more truly factors of our lives than we often remember. It was not only what Miss Octavia said and did which influenced others. It was herself ; her deep heart, stead- fast mind, and dauntless spirit which fed and stimulated those who Kved within the reach of her influence. Not that she was A^dthout faults. No, she had quite real ones, but they were her own, not a few taken out of a popular cata- logue. When I read obituary notices of her, crediting her ■\vith the commonplace virtues of kindness and unselfishness and gentleness, it annoyed me because those were not her virtues, and enumerating them gave the wrong impression of her character. She was strong-Avilled — some thought self-willed — but the strong will was never used for self. She was impatient in httle things, persistent with long- suffering in big ones ; often dictatorial in manner but humble to self-effacement before those she loved or admired. She had high standards for everyone, for herself ruthlessly exalted ones, and she dealt out disapprobation and often scorn to those who fell below her standards for them, but she somewhat erred in sympathy by urging them to attain her standards for them, instead of their own for themselves. " His standard is only getting drunk once a week instead of every day. Let us begin on that," I once said to her of one of the tenants of Barrett's Court, where I was the volun- teer and inefficient rent-collector ; whereupon she scorned me. On the other hand, I thought that her demands for the surroundings of the tenants were not high enough. She expected the degraded people to Live in disreputable con- ditions, uvtil they proved themselves worthy of better ones, whereas it can be argued that, for most folk, decent environ- ment is essential to the promotion of decent hfe. She had very httle sense of her own humour, and none at all of other people's, and I have seen with amusement my husband's best stories break before her close but irresponsive attention, especially if it occurred to him in the middle that the tale would not be up to her moral standard, for she expected high ethics even in jokes. She loved beauty to quite an unusual degree, and constantly found loveHness in small unobtrusive details, both in nature and art, but she resented being shown a view or having het ^-l^tention drawn MISS OCTAVIA HILL 31 to pictures or china, and usually disMked other people's arrangement of flowers or furniture. She took enormous pains with her workers and hked explaining herself and her principles to them, but she would brook no interference with her plans even in details ; and they were strong and brave persons who ventured to push their arguments against her views. She evoked more admiration than love, but she loved love ; and it was a trait in her character, which we never could understand, that she snubbed and stamped out the loves of some of the noble women who were ready to pour out their best at her feet. She had a remarkable power of obtaining help. Yoking her visions to her actions, she lived to see many of them reaUsed. Her enthusiasm was frank and infectious, and she painted even the skeletons of her organisations until they became interesting. Among her rare and most attractive quahties was a disregard of cold, hunger, or other physical discomforts. Indeed she seemed to dehght in bearing with joy what other people complained of. Of her Mrs. HiU wi'ote : Ootavia's mumps at present are nothing but a subject of joy to her ; for she stays at home and gets through quantities of work with the most gladsome spirit. It was this habit of mind which enabled her frequently to disregard the normal sufferings of the poor, and to expect them to feel the same indifference that she felt to petty hardships. She wrote to Miss Mayo : Somehow personal poverty is a help to me. It keeps me more simple and energetic, and somewhat low and humble and hardy in the midst of a somewhat intoxicating power. It pleases me too, to have considerable difficulty and effort in my life, when what I do seems hard to the people — though they never know it. She was small in stature with a long body and short legs. She did not dress, she only wore clothes, which were often unnecessarily unbecoming ; she had soft and abundant hair and regular features, but the beauty of her face lay in her brown and very luminous eyes, which quite unconsciously she Ufted upwards as she spoke on any matter for which she cared. Her mouth was large and mobile, but not improved by laughter. Indeed Miss Octavia was nicest when she was made passionate by her earnestness. She lived with her mother and three sisters, all five supporting themselves by keeping a girls' school at 14, Nottingham Place, Marylebone. 32 MRS. HILL AKD HER DAUGHTERS They were remarkable women, each with well-defined individuaUties, good and pubhc-spirited, devoting them- selves to the service of their pupils, and the poor. Their pupils honoured them and worshipped, as schoolgirls will, either Mrs. Hill, Miranda, Florence, Emily, or Octavia, as their tastes dictated. I was never at their school, but when I joined Miss Octavia's group of workers I was young enough — eighteen — to be admitted to mix with the pupils, and then reahsed the marvellous powers possessed by Miss Miranda, who still fives in my memory as the most beautiful of human characters. Into this uruque family of five fine women Mr. Barnett was introduced when he was twenty-four, and introduced by the best of chaimels, common work for a common aim. Miss Octavia was six or seven years older than he was, and having clearly thought out her principles on refief and how they would affect and remedy some of the social economic evils of the time, she took him \vithout effort or fuss as a pupil, and poured out both her ideals and methods for their attainment. As the districts were mapped out for refief, she gave her workers charge of them, and discussed the case of every appficant with Mr. Barnett, whose ecclesiastical position gave him the opportunity of forming a judgment on the workers' powers, as weU as the requirements and characters of those who soirght assistance. She was very good to him, took trouble to bring him into touch with interesting people, but they met as working comrades mainly and he never introduced her to his faixuly or friends. His feefing for her was deep, strong, and very beautiful, founded on admiration which reached veneration, and in those days it included unquestioning obedience, uncritical agreement, and fervent chivalry. They respectively worked each other hard without pity, while counseUing moderation and rest to others. To old Mrs. Barnett, who had only heard of her, she was a source of continual fear, and I attributed part of her warm welcome to me, after our engagement, as due to refief of mind. Though no names were mentioned, her inabifity to understand such a friendship was evidenced in her con- gratulations on my youth, and her strongly expressed opinion that men should marry women younger than them- selves, and not older ladies whose views were aU settled, and who liked the work they had given themselves to do better than taking care of their husbands and their homes. MES. BARNETT AND MISS OCTAVIA HILL 33 This libellous view of Miss Ootavia, the old mother, even when they were personally acquainted, never altered, for though the bogey she had conjured up was innocent of the attributed faults, the noble lady had the faults which caused her to take httle trouble about those humdrum people whom she did not find interesting or useful for her aims. CHAPTER IV " Qod is love, and they that love dwell in Ood, they understand the life of God, and to them the world seems very good and people kind and true." On December ;>rd, 1870, Air. Barnett and I first met. It Ai^as at the birthday party of Miss Octavia HiU. In inviting Miss F. Davenport Hill she wrote : i-Jaturdajf evcnuig December 3rd is our party for our old tenants here. Oh ! do come if you possibly can. I remember going early to help Miss Octavia with the arrangements, and doing her beautiful hair in a more becoming way than in the tight twist at the back, which was where she usually carried it on her shapely head. I recaU the guests coming in shyly by the back entrance, and the rather exaggerated cordiahty of Miss Octavia' s greeting in the effort to make them feel welcome; and Miss Miranda's bright tender way of speaking to everyone exactly alike, were they rich or poor ; and old Mrs. Hill's curious voice Avith its rather rasping purr of pride and pleasure and large-heartedness, as she surveyed her motley groups of friends ; and the two Miss Harrisons, those beautiful and generous artistic souls, the one so fat and short and the other so tall and thin, and their duet, purposely wrongly rendered to provoke the communion of laughter, ending with the invitation to ever3'one to say " quack, quack," as loudly as each was able, if only to prove they were aU " ducks." Miss F. Davenport Hill was there, and Mr. E. C. Maurice and Miss Emma Cons and Miss Emily Hill and Mr. Barnett. He and I were never introduced, but sat next to each other at the abundant homely meal to which all the guests, still in their out-door garments, sat down together — not the poor sitting and the rich waiting — and we talked ; I, knowing that he was " the Curate " and thinking half contemptuously of him as a member of that fraternity ; he, as he told me long afterwards, wondering what this 34 MISS H. 0. ROWLAND 35 " child " with bro^vn curls down her back, handsome furs, and a Tyrolese hat — then the fashion — could be doing among this set of pioneer philanthropists and their low, and often coarse, tenant protegees. I seem to have confided to him that I felt the people to be so painfully ugly, not in their clothes but in their faces and figures, and no doubt he improved the occasion, for in those days he was not wholly free from the sententiousness of the curate mind. To this " child " of nineteen summers had been given a part, a very small part, in one of Miss Octavia's pioneer schemes. These schemes were based on principles which we aU three lived to see revolutionise charity and change the tenor of pubhc thought. Cormting that the only method of improving social conditions was by raising inchviduals, she held that it 'vi'as impertinent to the poor and injurious to their char- acters to offer them doles. They should be hfted out of pauperism by being expected to be self-dependent, and, in evidence of respect, be offered work instead of doles, even if work had to be created artificially. To this end, and mth the support of the Rector, Miss Octavia Hill had recently started a workroom for women, and created an odd-job de- partment for the houses she managed. As St. Mary's parish was mapped out into rehef districts, each was placed under the care of a visitor, and all apphcants were offered work as a test of their needs and capabihties. It was my privilege to be one of these visitors, and the efforts to assist the heroine of my Ufe brought me into working relations -with Mr. Barnett. In 1871 he began to write to me on parochial matters, and, Avith no care for him and no conception of his feeling for me, I yet had such a conviction of the im- portance of his character that I kept his letters. They are duU reading, but give evidence of his intimate knowledge of the parishioners, and his steadfast adherence to the principles on which the experiment was based. 34, Upper Montagu Stbbet, August 1871. 1 Deab Miss Rowland, — Mrs. T has a letter ; she overcame me by her anxiety to see another doctor, though I thought her wish unwise. . . I will watch J,Irs. Mac . Old W has as much from us as he can expect, within the last two months 4s. a week have been added to his income. I leave the soothing of his bitterness to you with perfect confidence in your success. . . Will you let me know where Ivlrs. Q is to go at Ventnor, and when ? in fact, tell me all I have 1 This type is used only for Canon Bamett's words. 36 PARISH WORK to do. Rhoda got safely to the Home, but beyond this her parents have as yet heard nothing. . . S came on Mon- day ; 1 sent him to the Organisation Society. We shall, I sup- pose, grant him the £3.0.0. . . When I saw T a week ago he was still living at Paradise Place, but his boy had gone to live at his place in the Edgware Road. . . C has not come back, but the son is coming out of hospital. . . Some of the expense of R should be borne by us — I have your £1.3.5 towards it. To-morrow I shall not be at the C.O.S. I am going to luncheon with the Governors of the Fever Hospital, following, you see, your advice by making friends. . . I gave your message that you wanted to see S and your messenger was free, I think, from jealousy though not from envy. . . I went to see Mrs. N . I wanted to make acquaintance with your particular old woman. I did not fall in love with her ; an old woman of mine at No. 10 opposite, is, I think, much nicer. To H. 0. R., December 31 si, 1871.— Will you let me have the letter from Lord ? I think I know a woman who would like to go to America. ... I saw Miss Hill in Clifton, where she is as usual creating life and love. I was very pleased to hear from her that you are going to be one of her party at Ruskia's lecture. King Edward's Refuge, Spitalfields, can take in Emily W . 1 will refer her to you. Mrs. S ■ will, I think, under your influence send one child with Miss Rye. . . I know that you are always at home on Thursday and the knowledge does not add to the pleasure I usually find on those nights in Walmer Street Club. . . During the week I have been most interested by a young compositor who is d3ring. He says I have done him good ; perhaps I have. He talks quite sensibly and without any cant of trust in the love, or he says he likes better to say, the " mercy of God." Do you know it is the first time I have felt my re- ligion or theology to be strong enough to help the dying ? I could tell you more about him, but not now. I love the body and the body's life so much that few things really pain me more than to see a young man die. I hope that I shall see you next Friday ; it seems an age since we met, long enough to make one fancy that you really did " take the veil " as you threatened when I left you at that mysterious door. Thank you for your good wishes ; I can use no words so fitting as yours. You have your own hopes for your future work, and I have my own hopes about that future which I wish to be realised. Your words though are the best, may you have in the New Year " all God's good gifts and suc- cess — the highest." . . How the last hour of the year stirs up one's memories and one's hopes ! MISLEADING MANNERISMS 37 To H. 0. R., January lUh, 1872. — I was very disappointed last night that you were not with us. Perhaps though this, as other disappointments, ends in better things, and you will have more strength for other days. My faith however is so weak as to plan particular pleasures and to grieve when hopes are broken. Ruskin was very good and the lecture was charac- teristic. The bird of calm is the halcyon, the kingfisher, who for love became a bird, and for whom the Gods give days of calm. We are to aim at making for ourselves nests of calm, and he told us how. On February 4th, 1872, Mr. Barnett wrote to ask me to marry him. The letter surprised me very much, as I had taken his many communications as representing his anxiety for the success of Miss Hill's social experiment, and the consecj[uent frequent supervision of one of her young workers. Moreover, he looked so very much older than his age — twenty-seven — that I had accepted his interest as that of a Idndly elderly gentleman, with small sensitive hands, a bald head, and shaggy beard. Indeed, both in appearance and manner, he was far removed from a girhsh idea of a lover. Years after our marriage, when we had been to see The Private Secretary, he, amid his laughter, declared that in his early curate days he had closely re- sembled the caricature of the worthy ecclesiastic in the play. We of course contradicted the modest assertion, but it was not whoUy without truth. ^ He dressed very badly, generally obtaining his clothes by employing out-of-work tailors in the district. He always wore a tall silk hat which, as he had purchased by post, never fitted, and so was usually tilted over his forehead or rammed on at the back of his head. His umbrella was a byword, and he always bought his black cotton gloves two or three sizes too large. He approved of wearing a flannel shirt and united it to a white collar with a black silk ready-made tie. The beautiful humiUty of his nature made his manners diffident and uneasy ; indeed he was often at the same time both shy and aggres- 1 Lady Courtney, in response to a request for some remembrances of those days, wrote : It was in the winter of 1875 when I first met Canon Bamett. I was living and working with Octavia Hill when the Vicar of St. Jude's and his young wife called in Nottingham Place. I was not attracted, and shall I confess what my first impression was of one who in after-years became my dear and honoured friend ? Well, the young man — for he was young then, though he never looked it — struck me as plain and insignificant and with no easily read expression. In fact, what in my old hunting days I should have classed as a " poor thing." 38 NOBILITY OF NATURE sive, defects which he covered by a frequent nervous laugh. His active sympathy made him almost servile in his anxiety to aid, and yet the absence of the instinct of sex protection produced difficult incidents. For instance, I recall his astonishment at my indignation when, at one of Miss Octavia's tenants' parties, he and Mr. Young carried a drunken man and laid him at the bottom of the van to travel home, under my and the other women's feet. He carried his money in a cheap purse, doled out stamps as if they were priceless, and was punctihous almost to parsimony on petty financial matters, small habits which were entirely contrary to his real generosity of heart. Insignificant as wexe these externals, they happened to be peculiarly un- attractive to a girl who had been reared in a luxurious home, accustomed to lavish living and entertaining, who revelled in hunting and gardening and outdoor hfe, and whose beau ideal of a man was her vigorous happy chivalrous father, whose loss she was then deeply mourning. He was a man who, with all his sterhng virtues, only " considered the poor " by the medium of his purse, being occupied in enjoy- ing every aspect of life with his children and his worldly art-loving friends, taking his pleasures with a careless generosity which may have been reprehensible but which was very endearing. Mr. Barnett's wish troubled me very much. He was entirely different from any of the men I had known, and in the plans I had formed for spending my life at Bethnal Green I could see no place for marriage with its obedience and its ties. My inclination was to give a decisive " No " to his beautiful letter, but I knew that, if I did so, either he or I would have to give up Miss Octavia's work ; and to injure her schemes at that juncture was an impossible con- ception, worth the demand of any sacrifice on the part of either of us. I therefore wrote to tell him that my feehng for him was only that of respect, and suggested that we should go on with our work for six months and not refer to the matter during that period. The letter was quickly answered in these words : Thank you ; let all things be as 3'ou say. I am sure you will do whtt is right. . . Six months seems a long time, but perhaps the end will come sooner. Anyhow I trust you now as I woiild trust yon always, and I am yours in love and life. — S. A. B. I said nothing to anybody about his wishes, but the DECISION TO PUBLISH EARLY LETTERS 39 knowledge of Mr. Barnett's affection caused him to take a larger place in my thoughts, as I endeavouied to look behind the irritating mannerisms to tind his nature, tastes, and faiths, an endeavour that Iiis frequent and illuminating letters made more easy. Every letter contained information or questions about the work we were doing togetliei', but all these passages have been excluded, the extracts selected being chosen to illustrate his personahty, and to explain the influence of his love on his life and work. The decision to give them to the world has been made with a great effort and has involved to me a sense of irre- trievable sacrifice. But as I recognise the interest of the thoughts, the lofty ideahsm of the principles, the noble patience of his unconcjuerable love, and the humble hope- fulness they express ; and when I compare them with the trivial personaUties of most so-called '' love-letters," I feel it is my duty to share with kindred spirits, and especiaUy with the young for whom he cared so sympathetically, a knowledge of the divine in human relations. I do not feel that contact with the world will suUy my treasured letters, for with deep understanding he ever taught that faith in what was best in man produced it. Never for a moment did he doubt Lowell's words — " Be noble ! and the nobleness that lies In other men, sleepmg, but never dead, Will rise in majesty to meet thine own." So I surrender my letters, certain they will evoke if not sympathy at least the silence of respect. 34, Uppee Montagu Street, ^¥., March 3Gtli, 1872. Deab SIiss E,owla]Sid, — I don't think our words in the least carried our thoughts to one another yesterday. Such failure makes one long for other means of knowing and being kno"Rai, and does it not also show that not by words but by slow- working acts is it possible to bring souls to God ? I won't say that I was sorry not to see you this morning, I am more glad that you should take care of yourself than give me the chance of meeting you. You see, 1 want 3'ou to live even though you dislike the body and its requirements so much, and though 1 know that life cannot die with the body. I don'fc tlunk however my wish is wrong ; after all it is only through our bodies that we are able to be ourselves or know others. I have just answered Iwiss Jj ill's letter. I can't think why you and she should consider me so able to do -without service. Perhaps people never do see their own work and power. I know 40 LETTERS, 1872 though what has been done and what might be done. I am sure there is no man who needs more what you can give than i do. Alone, there is some chance of my becoming cold, politic, rational. I need as Caponsacchi did, " To have to do with nothing but the true. The good, the eternal — and these, not alone In the main current of the general life, But small experience of every day. Concerns of the particular hearth and home : To learn not only by a comet's rush But a rose's birth — not by the grandeur, God, But by the comfort, Christ." Please don't you mistake me by thinking that I by myself can do God's work. 1 don't think I could alone. April 1th, 1872. — To write to you is the next best thing to talking to you. As I have told you I cannot work alone, and preaching is lonely work ; to-night, therefore, I seem to crave for sympathy and can find it only in writing to you. I saw you in the churchyard and turned back with the intention of join- ing you, but when I saw others with you I felt shy and went on. I like showing myself to you, but I am, you know, " re- served " and don't like showing myself to others. Preaching as I did, I felt as if I had been dragged out into the light and shunned meeting those who had seen me. Perhaps my dislike arises from the great need I feel for fellow-workers to fill out my work. Preaching I put myself and only myself forward. . . Since church. Young and I have been discussing things in general with Mr. Fowle. On one subject we were for once agreed, viz. the very slight reference our Lord ever makes to a state hereafter. The parables read with the thought that thej' refer to a present state become easy to luiderstand. You can imagine how I back up such views. Christ gives joy not by promising a future good, but by making us able to enjoy the present. I intend to try j\Ir. Fowle with your argument about spiritualism.! He will say, as I gathered to-night, that it is impossible to believe a miracle which has no moral purpose. I have been thinking about you and Lucy T and my conclusion is that you must see her alone. We both agreed last night that to shield one we love from what might be un- pleasant if it be right, is neither brave nor kind. You must, however, find out more certainly where she is, and about doing this we may settle when we meet.^ 1 I was deeply interested in spiritualism, and had evidence that I possessed whatever the power is which made tables move, knocks supply the unknown answers to questions, and " Planchette " to write. 2 Lucy T was a girl in my district who had left her home and gone to live with a disreputable companion. It was to seek her in those haunts of vice that he now agreed. LETTERS, 1872 41 April IQth, 1872.— Last night I erred in thinking and speak- ing hard things about myself. I forgot, you see, the passage you showed me in Aurora Leigh and anything you said I richly deserved. 1 don't thinly that men are only props for women to lean upon. Surely God very very often speaks through women to men. I have reason to know this, and if it is depend- ing to look to Jliss Hill for inspiration to enable me to work, then I depend. In fact, as I said the other day, I want, as Caponsacchi did, God near me, and I don't think the want unmanly. Is it not woman's work " to guide, to comfort and command ? " The preaching question is a long one. I want very much to hear everything you can say about it; it never can be " pre- sumptuous " for you to do what you are able to do. I know that God's truths must be given, the question is how, by life or by words ? Did you ever think why it was our Lord was not transfigured before many but only before those Ke specially loved ? This is too long a subject for a letter. I am anxious about Kate D } I heard wretched things about her yesterday. April 15th, 1872. — Letters are a long way behind conversation, and are a very poor substitute for a talk with you. I seem hardly to have seen you at all last week, and now Miss Hill wants me to do the books next Saturday. I must get off this in a way to satisfy my conscience and yet have the afternoon with you on the river or somewhere equally pleasant. Can your sister go on Saturday ? I am so afraid of giving up any actual duty ; as it is I give up for myself so much thought. Here, though, I can satisfy my conscience, if it is so much more im- portant to be than to do, and the thoughts that are so pleasant help me to be more and feel more. You don't mind this kind of dependence, do you ? I am almost sure that it is the right kind ; when I read things which stir my mind I long to be able to talk them out with you, and I am sure I should be better for such talk and come to much truer conclusions. Have you ever noticed how much women's influence has been wanting in history ? It is hard to mark the mighty work it doubtless has done because it works secretly ; but in many great characters we may see the want. How many have been Lydgates, making women the companions of their holidays, 1 I smile when I recall the dismay of my conventional aunt, when, on going after Kate T> , I found that she was in bad hands, and that the only way of saving her was by then and there taking her home with me as an " assistant parlourmaid." " What ! a girl with no training and a bad character, out of a low court, to handle oui cut glass and Spode ! " She broke some, it is true, but her strong affection lifted her out of tempta- tion and she strove to do rightly. We ultimately sent her out of the reach of her evil relations to Australia, where she happily married and wrote often of my far-off god-child. 1—5 42 LETTERS, 1872 how many have sought in them a " semi-servile and feebly in- teUigent solicitude," how many, like Voltaire, have looked to find in them the friendship they might have found in men ? The philosopher's meeting with Blumine is but a by-play. Women have been playmates or despots. Spurgeon tried to teach us that the key to effective life is unity of life, and unity of life surely means that all human relations must be part of one whole. Every man in his own little way must thus depend, and I am sure I must. April I9th, 1872. — It seems that I must again to-day satisfy myself with a letter. Yesterday the people's minds were so full of this murder ^ that visiting them was not cheering. I therefore especially want your company. I mean that the murders made visiting sad because the strength of the sym- pathy seemed to make the people more selfish. " This is the help we are likely to get, our only friend is in our own pockets." " We may starve for all that you or anyone else care." They did feel for the poor ^vretch, and when they railed at the absence of all kindness, I saw in their words signs of much kiadness. Still, the utter want of faith in God or man, the powerlessness to see a care which goes deeper than the care for bodily comforts, the bitterness which raged against all in power, were very pain- ful. I felt as if I were face to face with the forces which destroy and ruin nations, faithless, ignorant, selfish. God knows I don't wonder at the indignation. Ought we not to be indignant, with a -svise indignation, that on God's earth where Englishmen teach and Englishmen rule, a father should choose that his children should die rather than live ? Does not the fact mock the bright sunshine of this spring beauty ? Well for those whose indignation finds vent in quiet hopeful work among God's children. I am sure it is neither right nor useful for you to devote yourself so much to the night schools. It is not right because our bodies are members of Christ, part, that is, of the self which has its place in the figure of perfect humanity. It is not useful because your martyrdom will do less for the cause of ediication than your life. I am not altogether selfish therefore when I complain that the night school hides you from me. . . It must not be forgotten that the London School Board has been established too late to touch the children who, then aged thirteen to fifteen, gathered into night schools. I had taken the responsibility for three evenings a week, one for boys in an underground cellar, two for girls in a smaU ground-floor room, in a terrible court, which had recently come into Miss Octavia's hands. The people were very ' A father haJ mm'dei'cJ his children who were starving and neglected. LETTERS, 1872 43 rough, and many lights and quarrels took place, for the settlement of which I was not infrequently called upon as umpire. One evening Mrs. Nassau Senior was in our school, when a specially noisy fight resulted in all the girls tearing out to watch or join in it. " What shall we do ? " I asked, as she and I stood alone in the deserted heavy- aired room. " I vnR sing to them," she rephed, and standing on the raised step at the doorway, the shouting angry fighting crowd just below her, she lifted up her beautiful voice and sang — "Angels, ever bright and fair, Take, oh ! take me to your care." The people heard, found something more interesting than the fight, and gathered round her to Ksten, and as she stood in the dark court with a background of flaring gas hght which turned her flaxen hair into a halo, she seemed to some of us to be one of the angels of whom she sang. April 2lst, 1872. — It was good of you to write to me to-day. I was longing to see you or hear from. you. There is much in your letter to talk about. God knows I see that the world has wants and that a prophet might satisfy them, but every man who can speak is not a prophet. I believe that the work of " ordinary people," the work of meeting individuals and satis- fying them, is very great."- I quite think with you that the " inner feelings " are God's. Might this not be one reason why one should dislike to show them publicly ? They are God's, what right have I to use them and draw attention to m.yself ? They are the forces which are to carry me through life and make all life's acts good, they are not to be spent themselves. The steam which is to drive the engine must not be spent in whistling. Perhaps though all my difficulty comes from my own shortcoming, from that incom- pleteness I so bitterly feel. Miss Hill is back by this time, is not that a pleasant thought ? Do you think there is any external standard of beauty ? It seems to me that form can only really be beautiful as it repre- sents life. But lazy generations have fixed the opinions of those who have gone before them into a law. Men therefore now run after forms which fall under this law. Just in the 1 This letter refers to one of our many talks on preaching, for his sermons were then academic, not to say drear, while at the same time the spiritual needs of individuals was his pervacling thought. I urged that congre- gations were only individuals combined, and should have their needs met from the pulpit by the living words of one whose " inner feelings " told him of God. 44 LETTERS, 1872 same way they adopt forms of worship which expressed the religious life of their fathers, and think the forms perfect, as they are like the old forms. I am inclined to thinli there is no such external standard. To each one that form is beautiful which represents life to him. I know that the face which shows me most of God, which tells of truth and faith, is beautiful, to me the most beautiful. April 2Uh, 1872. — I am just back from an evening with the Comtists. They have a large comfortable room in Lamb Court. Around are heads and engravings of the great men of the past and some humanity motto. Dr. Congreve and the disciples were standing before the fire when we entered. He is a fine tall man with a head that means benevolence rather than anything else. He received us very kindly and we entered on rather a mild chat. Soon some more came in and at last thirteen men gathered round the fire. Among them were Beesley, Harrison, Morison and Proudhon. Then conversation began. Eirst they talked generally of Comte's writings. Morison said he thought Comte aimed at being obscure — 1 daresay this is true, great leaders have spoken in parables for wise reasons — then others went on to remark on the perfection of his writings and how there never seemed to be a word too much or too little. Beesley complained of a want of clearness, instancing as an example Comte's way of speaking of " our fundamental law " when really he would challenge anyone to say what that fundamental law is. Congreve answered that this law is the taking of things as they really are. The conversation on the point made me feel as if I were with a lot of parsons. The contempt for the outside world, the worship of the letter rather than the spirit of the master's books, the attitude of attack were " theological." Then the talk came down to politics, but nothing new or striking was said. They showed a strong feeling for Erance and held interference to be higher poHcy than " non-interference." They were in favour of Eawcett's Bill, and seemed to think that Gladstone needed to be " dipped in the cold waters of opposition " to rouse him to action. I was very disappointed with Beesley ; he is younger than I expected and he seemed to let rather crude thoughts run out at once into words. Harrison i is one of those mysterious-look- ing people who may be either fast or enthusiastic. He did not say much but I should be ready for much from him. Morison spoke well and seemed a careful thinker. Altogether the evening was dull and not at all what I ex- pected. I have pleased myself, though, now by telling you all about the evening. Can't you imagine that I must like writing 1 Mr. Frederic Harrison in later years became our stalwart friend. LETTERS, 1872 45 to you, and can't you imagine, too, that I must like hearing from you ? It is good after the day's work to open heart and mind to one whom we may trust, so good that I don't know how I am going to give up the doing it. In order to understand some of the most beautiful passages in the follo-\ving letters it is necessary to mention that though I was young I was bearing difficult responsibilities. A relation whom I loved was faUing into grievous sin which my presence might remedy. An earnest inquirer into spirituahsm who had seen me across the room at a large party, sought an introduction so as to tell me that I pos- sessed occult powers which it was wicked not to use. I feared that one who was very dear to me was wrecking her Ufe by a mistaken judgment ; and my perplexities kept ahve the grief for the loss of my kind father. I longed to hve as well as to work among the East End people, and my sister, who was studying art, often advised me not to neglect such talent as I possessed. It was hard to see what "vvas right amid conflicting duties, and I was not at hberty, even had I wanted to do so, to tell Mr. Barnett all the facts. His care for me had not waned, though I had done my best to alienate his affections, and this added to my unhappiness. I needed to be alone to try to see Life's duties in their true relation, and therefore had decided to sacrifice my work and to go to read in Germany. A'pril 28th, 1872. — I was very disappointed at not seeing you to-day, not because I wanted, as I often do, to talk things over with you ; but because I felt so dull and stupid. Thoroughly selfish am I not ? I suppose when people are ill they care only to be with those to whom they don't mind showing themselves as they are. It is a great strain to be cheerful and sympathetic when one's head is like a lump of lead ; this must be my excuse for wanting to see you to-day. My cold makes me so stupid, and it would have been a great relief to have shown myself in my stupidity after straining to talk to discontented women and apathetic candidates as if I were a superior being. Our " Retreat " last night produced no results ; we were not equal to mastering Descartes. We had therefore a desultory talk. Mr. Fowle made himself merry at the expense of meta- physicians, and we all came nearer to an agreement on the subject of paid and voluntary work. I do hold that spiritual work should be voluntary, but it is a difficult subject. Too hard to talk out last night, too hard to talk out now with a small boy standing behind my chair anxious that I should fence wth 46 LETTERS, 1872 him, and who breaks the monotony of waiting by bursting out into patriotic songs. Yes, the last three months have made you much dearer to me and I can't conceive how there can be another woman in the world who will so meet my wants and stimulate my powers. To bear the loss of you will strain mj' faith in God as no other loss has ever strained it. But 1 won't think of this, the present is good and nothing can over take that away from either of us. I suppose on Satiu'daj^ we shall have one more quiet talk and then you will be out of sight for a time. I vi-ondcr if you ever guess what a storm of passionate words and acts a man has to hold back as he talks calmly to the one he loves. Hay 1st, 1872. — I am driven to write to you, simply to write to you, for I do not know what to say. I can't tell you how ^^Tetched you made me. To plead with you is what I won't do ; to argue with 3rou is I know of no use. Just see how theories fly at the touch of truth. I tried to teach you that we make our own troubles, and here is a trouble which I dare not face. Let me, however, as I have all along, trust you. If A'ou do think it best, think it in yoiu' own heart best, to decide against me before going away, do so. I was weak and stupid when I asked you to let me live in a kind of fool's paradise for the next two months. I can't face the thought of an " ever- lasting l\o," it sent a shudder through me to-day, but I can hope that God will give me strength. I am sure I shall not regret the last few months, if I am not to know you all through life, it is good that I have kno\\ai you so long. The time has been blessed and its effect won't be to make me tired of hfe and weary of my kind. You say I have helped you. I hope I have ; sometimes I think I could help you more. It is hard to understand half confidences, and it is not well to trust to im- agination. You majr be sure God means us here to walk in green pastures and sit beside the waters of comfort. We shall do so when we are not alone, when we are guided, when we conquer temptation. ^\'ould to God that we might together rest in a cj[uiet home, helping and strengthening one another ; it not, God help me, and preserve you. May 5th, 1872. — Since Srmday I have learnt to be with you even though I don't see you. I am not therefore going to write a "grumbling" letter. It is very strange, that sense of God between us. I feel you with me as I feel Him. I draw near to you as I draw near to Him. The sense is good and throws light on the Bible, on religion and on life. I begin to see that the words of the most trustful Psalms might be my words. Yes, whatever the future is, the Lord watches over us and the future must be good. 1 pray that the struggle which I left j'ou fight- LETTERS, 1872 47 ing has ended, I did so wish to lielp you and I do so long not to be selfish. It would not though have been right for me to have said I would give you up, would it ? Tvesday. — I went through the Academy. . . I hope you will teach me about pictures and their meanmg. We may hope, though we don't form plans, and I hope you will help me to see pictures. \\'e had the Confirmation this morning, it is a solemn form, but somehow seems to fall grievously short of what it might be. I wonder if I shall ever cease to attack whatever does not seem the very best ! 3Iay 8th, 1872. — I think I understand your sorrow and I am sure I cannot blame it. We must grieve when our dear ones are dead and our love and care are no longer needed, but the grief can't last long. Soon we feel that the dear ones are in heaven and know that our love and care glow again through them to brighten other lives. You will be happy, you will feel that the Lord is your Shepherd and the Shepherd of those you love, neither j'our fears nor your hopes mil disturb you, and you will rest by the still waters. Do not be anxious about P . Where God has given a true pure heart the power to love, it will not love badly nor in vain. Why fear ? Trust God who guides all lives and asks of us only obedience. Why let your hopes disturb you ? You will work for the people, you cannot tell how. God must guide. He gives us our work, and some of us have to do that which seems to us not to be work. Don't then think that you can discover a plan of your life and steer for an end which, good and beautiful though it be, may not be your haven of rest. I am talking to j^ou as I talk to mj'self. I don't want in this letter to bring my own cares forward, but since you know how I see an end before me which is very good and beautiful, but which may not be for me, I try to help you as I help myseK to trust in God. Would that I could give you better help ! I don't think I say this selfishly. I love you so much that I would help you at any price. In this quiet hour perhaps you are praying, and our spirits meet at God's throne and we strengthen one another. About going away, you know best. I can imagine that it will be good for you to be away. For me it can make no difference. God has given it to me to love now, and love I will in all joy and trust. May 9th, 1872. — I burnt your letter last night and to-day I feel as one who has had a troubled dream. I think of you in a great passion of sorrow, tried and worn by the forms of hopes and fears. The fancies of the night stand on the same level with the facts in the letter. Imagination is my master and 48 LETTERS, 1872 surrounds you with sorrow just as it will. I see you so. Some voice says, " Go and find her," but another says, " You are one more cause of sorrow, keep away." I remain alone and the loneliness of unhelpfulness is worse than the loneliness of help- fulness. I do though believe in your future, for God will help you and make you happy and sure. May lOth, 1872. — The unexpected joy of meeting you was too much for my old used-up nerves. I quite forget what you said about Mrs. Q and Mrs. T . To whom and when does Mrs. L pay her money ? I can't tell you how glad I was to find you " gooder " and happier. I daresay there is a good deal of selfishness in the gladness, but some of it is pure. I am selfishly glad because now I feel that I can again take a place in your thoughts. I do trust you not to forget me. I hope and i^ray you may get all good while you are away and so soon come back. If nothing inclines you to write and if you come back to send me away, God help me to remember that for you and for me He is for ever on His watch-tower. Goodbye, and believe me to be, Yours for ever, S. A. B." CHAPTER V " The Worship of the Highest is the bond of union betioeen man and woman, between the members of a society, between the citizens of a nation, between the nations of the loorld." It was with a sad heart and puzzled mind that I started for the Continent. My sister and I had been enthusiastic about the Franco- Prussian War and were much disappointed that our offer to nurse the wounded had been refused on account of our youth. Among the interests of the journey were the visits to the battlefields about which I had written to Mr. Barnett. After a few weeks my aunt and sister returned to London, and I went to a school at Boppart where, helped by the beauty of the stimulating Rhine, I tried to see what was right. May 2lst, 1872. — I envy you on your way to the mountains ; to us townsfolk God's voice in nature comes so fresh and strong. I never have the least doubt but that you on earth will hear and follow His voice. He won't at once make you "good" and restful. He never does anj'thing quickly. The mountains are the work of ages and a human soul is a greater work than they. Have patience then and soon you will be able to rejoice that His will is being done. Do you find an absence of fierceness in St. John ? In his Epistle you will find he felt very passionately and could use very stern words. In reading the Gospel I somehow forget St. John, his individuality seems lost in the individuality of Christ. I can imagine how the Gospel has comforted people, it shows how very close man might be to God. Now and then as I read it at night a flash of such comfort comes to myself and I feel that I have a guide on whom I can depend and that the highest work is within my reach. But soon earth's cares grow large again, and as I read, critical questions arise and difficulties suggest themselves — then I feel that I want j'ou to help me and make me more able to hear God's voice. You could do this, you have helped me to do so already. This is something to be thankful for, if I have helped you that is more to be thankful for. 40 r>0 LETTERS, 1872 I suppose I shall hear more certainly of your plans by and bye. Hiy half-formed intention is at present to go away for two or three weeks early in June. When I think how you are wanted here and how you must want to be here, I feel almost mad TOth myself for driving you awaj^ I fancy myself selfishly enjoying the joy of loving while you suffer. It must however be for me right to go on, and the most painful course is not always the most loving, the most unselfish. June 2nd, iS7:'. — This is to be an exercise on the pronoun " I." Somehow I never do lil-ce talking to other people about myself, perhaps it is because I don't think the subject would interest them. I know I do talk about myself to my mother because I know she is interested in the smallest thing which concerns me. I can't think it is the same with you. Sometimes indeed I feel that your life is part of mine and that the love which binds me to you can never perish, but then your words of refusal come in, and to them feelings have to give place. However here is the exercise. Verb "to like." I don't like Paris at all, only its noise and show impressed me. The sight of people on pleasure bent, the noise of their talking, the loudness of their dress, the tawdry churches, the paint and gilt ornamentation, all wearied and disgusted me. Then for art you know I have no real taste. The century ex- pects every man to understand and worship art, so we all talk a little about it. I am conscious of failure really to value it. It is men and women I delight in, their beauties, their folhes, their ugliness all interest me. The battlefields I don't think I should care to see. I do not know enough about the plans of the battle to be able to trace it out on the ground ; then I do hate war, so 1 certainly shall not study its details or try to find interest in them. The gambling tables I did like seeing, princi- pally for the reason you give, the people have forgotten them- selves, one can see them as they are. A rare sight in rich people, they are generally so wrapped up in the clothes of propriety. The gamblers are therefore not all ugly, it is possible to see some bits of true humanity. What you say about the girl is horrible, though I don't wish " kidnapping " were in fashion. The means are generally more important than the end. Your school life must be very pleasant ; you don't say what yovi read. I shall be afraid of you when you come back ; I am almost tempted to go to some quiet spot and read myself. . . You say you are not religious, neither am I. It is in your nature to be much more so than I am. Self in a thousand forms hides God from me, and it is only very seldom that I feel at one with Him. The words of the Psalms are far, so far out of my reach. . , LETTERS, 1872 51 Do you really think it good for you to be away from home ? ■ I hope it is. What you say of its loneliness and quiet makes me think it may be, but then I know how you long to be with your sister and the people. . . Verb " to do." Saturday I took the Walmer Street boys to Erith. We wont by rail and came back by steamer. Mr. M met me and helped amuse the boys. I think they enjoyed themselves. I do like boys, they are so open, so ready to the call on their honour. The scene on board the boat was very horrid. A great many drunken men were partly jolly, partly quarrelsome. The boys got mixed up with them, and when I called them off the men were angry and abused Mr. M for being religious. If I had been admiring the boys all day, I admired the women now who so bravelj^ wisely, and tenderly managed their drunken husbands. Verb " to think." I have been writing my sermons. One has been on the value of the body. I tried to show how the body individualises the soul and how he who dies with hands unmarked by the print of the nails, wounds won in the conflict with evil, dies without the marks of the greatest glory. . . At our discussions we have been talking about the relation of authority to opinion, and about angels. As to the first, I don't think authority should have any influence on opinion. We must think for ourselves, and the fact that the Church or public opinion thinks differently must not make us alter our views. If I take the opinion of another person, it is because I have first formed an opinion of him. Then as to angels, I have been arguing that they may be the spirits of the dead doing God's work, bearing His mes- sages to men. My friends hold against me that angels are " subjective." Will the beautiful sound of that word win you to their side ? iliss Hill is getting on with the school work, working, I fear, too hard. She does throw me into despair ; I do so httle and feel so worn out ; but I could fill pages in praise of her and then not say all you think about her. Besides I think I had better end this long exercise on "I" or you will never have time or patience to read it. . . I hope you will find time to write to me soon, and in my next letter I will do the verb " go." As for the verb " hope," when shall I dare do it ? June 8th, 1872. — Your letter came in about the moment when I was thinking how soon it would be possible to hear from you. I don't think I need tell you of the joy it gave ; it bore to me the brightness of the flowers of which it spoke and sent me down to "V^'almer Street as if I had seen them on my table. Now let me read it again and answer it bit|by bit. 52 LETTERS, 1872 I should like to know the Germans. I admire and respect their soHd strength, but I am wrongly impatient of slowness ; it would do me good to know them and make me more thorough. . . Yes, I ixnderstand your reason for wishing to study. . . I am not going to be ill, and as I have so often told you, you have done me nothing but good, oh ! so much good that you will never know it. I am going on Tuesday to Chfton to spend a few days with my mother. I don't feel much disposed for the quiet, I am too unsettled, but I must give her some of my holiday. . . I think Christ chose to fight alone, every son of man must fight alone, for the heart knoweth its own bitterness. It weakens us if we try to carry our friends into the fight, if we learn to use weapons which are not our own, and life becomes unreal. We have our own trials, we must meet them with our own strength and learn that we have weapons which can kill all foes. To those who thus fight, God will send His angels and tell of victory now and victory for ever. While the fight is going on, it is the part of friends to watch and pray. The thought of the struggle in the garden should help us all. Don't call me strong. I let all kinds of sin and meanness get into my citadel ; if I keep out the greater sins it is often only by throwing myself into work. . . About the body I am right. The crown of thorns is man's noblest crown and we wear it because we have bodies. The marks we win in our fight with sin will be our eternal distinc- tion. The body may suck one down, but it is that we may rise again in victorious strength. You do know this and you do bless God for your creation, bless Him for the difficulties which have made you find yourself, bless Him that through you He is giving a message to men which none other has borne or can bear. . . About the dinner parties. I grant you I am wrong to turn away from the rich, but we must have our own likings and I don't feel a call to go to them as I am called to go to the poor. I agree that to those who could look into their heart, they would be beautiful, but not more beautiful than other human hearts, would they ? It is their affectation, their unreahty which wearies me. The children, the little girls, arouse in me all kinds of bitter thoughts and wishes. I stand in the potato plot, where there is plenty to do and enjoy. I leave it to others, men or circumstances, to go to the richer plots and bring their beauties to me. Sometimes I think nothing but hard words and cruel cuttings will save the rich, and I am too fond of giving hard words to trust myself to teach them in this way. In the past week I have done little, my time has gone in doing small acts. I have read nothing but the June Middle- march and a French play — of the former we will talk when you have read it. I have had some discussion about the right of BETROTHAL 53 lyiag. I feel lying can never be right, but where is the line to be drawn. Is disguise right ? is reserve right ? I am driven by such arguments into a corner. I am inclined to say — but tell me what you think. Do write when you feel inclined. The mere fact of receiv- ing a letter from you won't add to my hopes or fears. It is five weeks to-day since we really parted, and I am sure your absence has not decreased my love. It is a treasure laid up in heaven which moth can't corrupt and sometimes I think that not even words from you could destroy it. If you say " No," still I shall feel that you can't tear yourself from me, and I shall look on to a more distant future. Please write soon, for your letters are so good to me. I grant I read them through hoping to find grounds for a better hope, but if I find none I can and do rejoice in the present. Now goodbye. You know Without my saying how dear you are to me, and you told me once I had no right to call you " mine." Believe then that I have not learnt to care the least bit less and am now and always, your Samuel Babnett. The peace Mr. Barnett hoped for me was given to me at Boppart, but not for long, for on Tuesday, June 18th, my sister wrote to tell me that her engagement to Mr. Ernest Hart was to be very short, and to ask me to return home immediately for her marriage, and to remain with my aunt afterwards. I travelled back at once and reached home on June 24th. On the following day Mr. Barnett and I pHghted our troth, for I had reaUsed that his gift of love was too holy to refuse. Together we spent a long sunny Wednesday on the river at Cookham ; and the next morning he started with his brother for a holiday on the Continent. It seemed a strange action after he had just obtained what he had so longed and patiently waited for, but Mr. Barnett had both perfect self-control and too great a respect for plans to allow them to be broken. He had arranged with the Rector to take his holiday, he had arranged with his brother to go on the Continent, and they were both expecting him to keep his engagements. An incident in his own life — even so great a one as his betrothal — was not to be allowed to interfere with carefuUy-made plans, so he pimctuaUy departed by the very train that had been arranged weeks before. Whether he was right or wrong I do not know, for during aU our glad years together this reverence for punctuality was a frequent small trial to me, and the complete mastery of liis thoughts a cause of envious bewilderment. He would break off the most sacred of confidences 54 LETTERS, 1872 or the most important of committees if the clock com- manded him to stop, and so wholly was his mind under his control that on one occasion when I was so iU that death seemed imminent, in spite of his deep love and agony of anxiety, he surprised the nurses and wounded my sister by steadily reading Ivanhoe. During this hohday Mr. Barnett wrote long and descrip- tive letters, some of which tell of conditions of Continental traveUing very different from what now prevails, but those portions are given which show his character when stirred to its depths. Something also can be gathered of what the obedience to his plans cost us both, for my troubles and per- plexities were increased by his absence. Zurich, June '28th, 1872. — I feel like a man who has taken a very deep plunge to avoid breaking his resolution to bathe. I have travelled for thirty hours so as to give myself no chance of turning back, we have pushed on and on and I am now here dog-tired, too tired to do anything but think of you and write to you. As I came through the country and everything seemed to remind me of you and connect itself with you, my thoughts went back to the time when you were travelling through France and everything seemed to remmd you of me. My spirit was persecuting you and wearing you down, your spirit followed me to bless and cheer me. Switzerland is very charming. God's work is so grand and man's work is so modest. The mountains tower up one above another, the houses hide away and seem to blush imder the large roofs. This is as it ought to be, is it not ? Men must work, and their work must be seen, but it should be hke a Swiss chalet, modest and hiding, while God's work, the king- dom of right, must stand out grandly like a Swiss mountain. But we must come here together some day, when you have taught me to see things more, when my fuller, my new life is older. Once I saw all scenery with a kind of despair, now with a kind of hope, because its hidden beauties are linked with you and you are mine. ZxmiCH, Ju7ie 2Qth, 1872. — Three days are gone of the dark three weeks. I hope that while God gives us bodies, we shall not be often so separated. Thought and letter-writing do something to bring you to me, but now they cannot supply the face and the voice. Then the joy of Wednesday was so new, the fruit of a hope so long held hopeless that now it almost seems a dream and I am ready to start back to make sure of it. I think I am learning here the good of a past, for in the hours of rest I find myself living again Tuesday morning (June 26th), LETTERS, 1872 55 and di-awing in its strength and comfort. Jlow everything of that day is printed on my soul ! If I could live always as earnestly as then, my sight would be keen and my memory strong for the troubles and wants of the world. I have sometimes thought that your earnestness of purpose might make care for little things impossible, now I see that if the mind and heart are roused, they are roused not for one end only but for all. So Christ, eager to convince the Pharisees, could notice the children's trouble, and bent on death could hear the blmd beggar's cry. I hope now that my life will be more earnest and more full. I think it will. You say sometimes you don't see how you are going to help me. Is not this one way ? There are many many others and I shall take all my life to tell you them. . . I hope to find a letter at Coire to-morrow just to feel and know that you are well. Do you know I shrink more from losing j^ou through death than from any other cause ? I always have felt this, I don't know why, so please take care of your- self, take extra care, foolish care. We will read Fifine together, and Browning shall plead the body's cause. . . CoiEE, June 30th, 1872. — Here I am writing to you, and I think I want to hear from you much more than you want to hear from me. I have been to the post-office in vain, your letter for me has not arrived, and there is no other comfort but to write to you. . . The memory of last week has not lost all its power to keep me happy. Frank says he knows that I give money away slyly in the greatness of my joy, and that there will be a large deficit in my accounts. Very sad, wo\ild it not be ? were you to make me forget " the principles." He will tell you himself his experience of a travelling companion in my condition. I try not to bore him, and he only makes merry with my supreme content. . . I am going to read something with you — Philosophy or Poetry, whichever you like. What a happy good time I have before me ! PoNTEESiNA, July 3rd, 1872. — If letters are not at the poste restante I don't know what I shall do. It will be a week since I have heard. When I think what a pleasure I found and gave away again, I am inclined to complain. How wonderful is the power which the spuit has over the body. I am better in health than I have been for many months, and I think the change is more due to you than to the Swiss climate, and now, wearied with heat and work, I can restore myself by writing to you. . . Frank is stretched out on a sofa opposite me, sending all kinds of messages to you, how that it is his bnthday, how that he has been taking care of me, how that he is grateful for your mention of him. I am sure you will like Frank, he has even less of art and imagination than I have, but he is just straight- 56 LETTERS, 1872 forward and good. He is a little too much inclined to turn to the funny side of life, and make his fellows act for his amuse- ment — a result, I imagine, of L'ickens infiuenoe. You will have to help him as you will help me, help him to love beauty and work with heart and mind. . . I wonder if we shall ever come here together. I don't think you will be able to rough it as much as is necessary. I was plarming yesterday how dihgenoe travelling would suit you. I thought at first I should not hke to put you into such close quarters with such strange companions, but I was wrong. I am not going to spoil you. I once promised you that you should have room for self-sacrifice. You will see life as it is, find out its real beauties through its real ughnesses. Oh ! it is horrible how men shut women up in a false, glittering, smiling world, and how women love to have it so. Better far that they should know how ugly, how terrible life is, and yet find, as they alone can find, how good is human nature. There, that is a little burst against society, the first for a long time. I am so contented, you see. . . SiLVAPLANA, July 4th, 1872. — What you say has made me restless. The whole matter is so important and I wonder if I could help you if I were with you. Erank has just been pro- posing a plan by which I should be home on Sunday. I won't agree to it though. I think you would write for me if I could help you. I shall go on therefore. Besides, what could I do ? Your love and truth must be your guide. . . But I won't go into particulars when I am at such a distance ; all I can say is — Be true, and don't wish your truth-telling eyes anywhere but above your truth-telling lips. I believe that somehow things will be right, but I am anxious to hear, anxious, yet happy that your troubles are now my troubles. . . We will indeed always live in a town. I hope in London. Like you I feel that life is but beginning, it is a good life and must bear good fruit. In a little time I shall look on to the future better and see what our work vnW be ; now I can't help simply rejoicing that you are going to work with me. You will be strong to help me. We will depend on one another. There is a true dependence of women on men and men on women. I do know you through and through, and as you love me, I can and will depend on you ; by our dependence we will make one another strong. . . That cotton gown question is not settled. I thinlv two would be enough for a trial of will. I am quite equal to letting the whole lot fall overboard, and sacrificing my stinginess to ob- stinacy. . . As to what you say about one's past, I have not thought much of mine. The past seems to have contrary effects. On the Greek and Italian, the effect is to make them dreamy and contemplative, feeders on the shadows of past LETTERS, 1872 57 glories ; on the English the effect is to rouse them to equal their fathers' deeds and keep their good name before the world. What is the cause of these different effects ? I tliink it is their different relation to the present. If men feel in them the strength and joy of life, the past is a spur to them, if not it is a soothing drug. Kow liitherto i don't think I have felt all the force of life. I have been afraid of resting under the shadow of work done and have turned away from the past. Now I can feel my life, I can see how God has guided me and the past will be a spur and a help. . . I shrLoli from seeing a wasted life, but I don't think I should mind dying or, what would be worse, seeing you suffer and die for right and good. . . CoMO, July 6th, 1872. — I read your letter as we travelled here. It did indeed bring its cloud upon a very fair scene. I am anxious, very anxious to hear more. . . My poor child. I wish I were with you to face this trouble with you. It would not be all pain, for the pleasure of helping you would be so great. On Thursday at Pontresina we had proposed to start at 4 and go up a mountain, but a mist hung over everything and we remained in bed. Shocking levellers are the mists, they go up from earth and settle upon the hills. Every peak is cut off, and all strange shapes are liid. Something like the spirit of fashionable society, which rises from men's selfish hearts and then settles on their characters, hiding all individuahty and dwarfing the lives God has made. Frank and I started, however, at 8 for a walk, and in about three hours we found ourselves in one of the most lovely places I was ever in. All around were the bleak and snowy moimtains, there was no sound save the sound of the water, and once we heard a marmot screech and saw the little creature fly away into the distance. I like sometimes being in lonely places, one feels so entirely oneself, and it is well that we should remember that however much our lives may be bound together, we must still be alone. Was it not Pascal who was in the habit of saying to himself, " I must die alone " ? Soon the snow began to fall on us in our valley, and we tried in vain to walk ourselves warm ; then it was most wonderful to notice the beauty of the flowers which grew on the hard ground and amid the barren rocks. There were yellow and pink anemones, pinks, crocuses, rhodo- dendrons, and many others whose names I don't know. We have picked a lot but have tried in vain to keep them. It is very good to know how even in this barren desolate corner God makes the earth beautiful. He does His best when there are no men to see and applaud, or does He make those places beautiful that those who have no longer mortal bodies, but who still keep their old tastes, might come and see them and find joy ? . . X— 6 58 LETTERS, 1872 After describing tlie drive from Switzerland into Italy, Mr. Bamett wrote : The scenery seemed to mock and protest against the system which established by the stream a frowning guard-house and suspicious watchmen. The earth was made for the Parliament of man and the Confederation of the world. The mountains say so. . . Vv^omen are at work ui rnost of the Italian fields. I think they seemed to work better than the men, but very often all together were lying under the shade. Why is it one does not like to see women at work m the fields ? is it an absurd prejudice, or is it a right instmct ? One is of coiu'se taclined to say that women should only make beauty, but then we know some women who are eminently fitted for hard work. . . In Switzerland we had not seen one beggar or been plagued by one porter. liere in Italy they swarmed, about our baggage. Big palaces line the lake and beggars appear in crowds. I wonder if wealth must always mean poverty behind. J\Ir. Fowle argues it is better to have a few very rich than a great many moderately so. He says the mequahty is good, and when hard-pressed confesses he thinks that for the sake of this, a few ought to be sacrificed to riches. I confess to a belief that God does not require such sacrifice. He loves each individual too well, and I hke the idea of fairly divided wealth. . . Lugano, July 9th, 1872. — These lakes are very beautiful. Bellagio on Lake Como had a view like a scene in fahy-land. We stopped at an hotel which was on a high wooded hill jutting out into and dividing the lake. As we walked around this hill by paths shaded with olive trees, magnolias, lemon trees, etc., we came on a succession of views taking in all the arms of the lake. We learnt now what it takes to make a summer, how fresh scents, blue skies, soft sounds of bu'ds and insects must all unite. We learnt too sometlung about rest ; there was no need of effort for eye or ear. The mountains stood out clear against the deep blue sky and the slightest sound caught us from any distance. It was very tempting just to sit down and gaze. " One day shalt thou rest." Rest, cessation of effort, is good sometimes. . . The law of rest, I hope I have found it now. As I have told you, my life has been restless, I have worried and wearied myself till I feel thed. iNow I think hand in hand with you, I shall be able to stand still and see all things plainly, see the present standing on the past and made sharp and clear by the deep future. I shall hear God's voice coming softly and gently as it came from the Garden of Eden. So to rest, as we rested at Bellagio, before going out to work. . . We went into the cathedral, a large cruciform building in the Italian style. It is of course disfigured by a lot of tawdry altars and some ugly warm painting, but the place was impressive. LETTERS, 1872 59 Many men and women were kneeling there, anu we iult that this cool quiet spot next to the busy market did answer a deep true want in men's hearts, iiut as we saw the dozens of fat, coarse priests bustling about, we felt that they were wrong and would have to go. Will the true for a time sink with them, or will mankind shake themselves free of the creatures and worship God as they want to ^ Imagine men building a system out of our love of natme, forcing us to look at God s beauty through their miserable httle spy-glasses, and making them- selves fat on our substance ; such and worse are these priests. There, I have made myself angry by looking at the one blot on the scene. You would have gone, have worshipped and re- turned thanking God because our fathers built these churches. Just as the unreaUty of the rich makes me angry, while you see much to be thankful for in them. Poor women ! here their sub- jection brings them into hard work, but perhaps this is not so bad as bringing them into the position of dolls and ornaments. iVIiss Florence Hill told me she had been reading a book of Mazzini's on The Duties of Man which deals with this subject. If it is translated, we will read it when 1 get home. You see i look forward to yom- reading whatever 1 read. We will talk the books over together, and in Queen's Gardens revel among King's Treasuries. . . LucEBNE, July 11th, 1872. — As I read the account of your day of difficulty, I feel angiy with myself that i was not by you to help you. There was so much for you to decide, and for you to bear. God helped you tiurough and the trial v/ill make you stronger, but it does seem selfish for me to sit here and write this. A difficult question, this of helping. I was sitting on a wall the other day waiting for the diligence to go on. A woman was trying to undo the door of the maciune, and the door had a pecuHar fastening. l\iy tirst impulse was to go and help her, my second thought was that if i left her alone she would discover the secret of the lock and be wiser for ever, my third was that had I gone, she would have learnt to believe in a bit of human kindness, and perhaps this would have been a better knowledge than that of the lock. This, however, is a difficult question, and I don't feel happy at letting you grow strong on your troubles all by yourself. I shall wait for to- morrow's letter and then decide about coming home. . . I am very glad you called on Mrs. Piggott ^ ; she has been very good to me, one of the best as one of the oldest of my London Mends. She has her faults, but is true as steel at bottom, and her temper as often blazes out rightly as wrongly. I like people with temper. I am glad you saw her, for you know it is not 1 The landlady of Mr. Bamett's lodgings, who remained our friend, and later our pensioner, until her death in 1911. 60 LETTERS, 1872 only young stockbrokers' hearts that j'ou win. I shall have a museum whereui to put the hearts my wife captures. I hope the museum may be my heart and that all those who love her will love me. . . Lucerne, Jv.ly Vlili, 1872. — The great treat of yesterday was an hour of the organ in the cathedral. The organ is very splen- did, and it is played for visitors who pay a franc a head. There is no instrument I. like so well as the organ. The church is unsuitable, a wretched white-washed place with tawdry gilt altars, so we shut our eyes and listened. My poor imagination went halting after the sounds and into all the fancies you came. Once he commenced by playing a kind of humdrum tune, a kind of slow plodding beating ; gradually music gathered around these prosaic sounds, they never ceased, but more and more blended with poetry ; so I thought my prosaic earthlj^ life would now gather round it music and joy. Then again I heard two voices, both low and gently sad, one was a man's and one a woman's, each seemed to be working and praying alone ; then came a sound of merry-making ; the organ laughed for glee, but soon in the midst of the merry shouts a crj' of pain seemed to rise, the cry grew louder and deeper. I longed for the first voices to answer. At last thej' did, and a sudden crash ended all. The crash was strange, but may not the joy of union and the power of answering the world's cry be ours, my darling ? Yes, I enjoyed the music ; till I knew you, I don't think I found so much pleasure in the world. I am glad, oh so glad that your troubles have ended as they have, but I am bitterly sorry that my absence has added to your trials. . . I feel inclined to start at once and have already told Frank that if the weather does not clear we will start home to-morrow. . . I have thought it well that I should have taken this trip, something says "It was good for Alice and good for Frank," but then again something says "It was selfish, very selfish to leave Y alone in her trials, and unfair to yourself." I don't know, but it shall not be so again. This resolution was kept, and for the rest of his life we together met our difficulties and shared our sorrows ; until thirty-eight years later the condition of his health compelled me to keep the greatest of coming changes from his know- ledge. CHAPTER VI " We can hope to see this man and this woman growing daily by one another's strength. We can by ho'pe see them in their home, drawing all men to the ways oj love, and by their work making the world gladder and holier." Our betrothal gave unqualified pleasure to Mr. Barnett's parents and family, and Miss Octavia's letter written on the day after our engagement expresses her beautiful mind, and her deep friendship for us both : 14, Nottingham Place, June 25th, 1872. Deae Mk. Baenbtt, — How can we ever any of us thank God enough ? He gathers us all in the hoUow of His hand and takes care of us. How one seems to see in this an earnest of the mighty blessings He will pour upon you both in the long glad years to come, which one seems to see before one in a vision. Not their exact form, of course — for how little that matters ? — but something of their spuit, something of their power, something of their growth. You will imagine how I have been praying for you both, all day long, first that what was really right might be, that all that was unreal might be subdued, and the strong great truth alone prevail. At first I dare not pray or hope for anything that might seem to me best, but after a time I seemed to know that I was not mistaken about what was best, and that it was all safe and sure of fulfilment, and I hardlji- seemed to need to open your letter, it aU seemed so sure. What it did most for me, therefore, was to make me feel your kindness in letting me in to share a little of your jo}' ; it is very good of you both. Henceforward one may feel that what you do she does, and what she does you do. And this letter in the same way is for you both. I should like to have been " kind and helpful " to you both, but I have felt on the contrary, as everyone must at such times, so utterly helpless ; iu fact, one is terrified to say or not to say, to do or not to do anything ; no human power, no human love seems great enough to meddle, it can even at its best only stand aside in reverent sympathy and prayer, trusting that God's mighty truth will prevail in its own good time. But the days may come when a friend may be able to be more, and then you may both know that while I live I never could fail you. What your help has been to me no one will ever know. I believe it will be even more in the years to come, for whatever makes you both better — — as your love must — will make me richer. So, you see, my joy in the evening's news becomes real selfish joy after all. And now I can but say once more, God bless you both, — I am sure He will and does abundantly. I am, yours ever faithfully, Octavia Hill. 61 62 GEORGE MACDONALD After my sister's marriage and Mr. Barnett's return from his hoKday, Miss Octavia went away, leaving us responsible for much of her organisation. It was the season when everyone was out of town, and, therefore, without inter- ruptions, we carried on the work, and in quietness saw much of each other. We visited all sorts of places together, spent long days on the river, and hung about museums ; but what is still vividly in my memory is his interest in seeing the works of the old masters, hitherto to him an unknown source of joy. His family neither knew nor cared about art, and he, imagining that his colour-bUndness would put pictures outside his powers of appreciation, had paid but scant attention to them. To me, therefore, fell the privilege of introducing him to the masterpieces in our national collec- tions, and of hearing his fresh thoughts on them. Stripped of the subtle and distracting influences of colour, he went direct into the spirit of the artist, and was starthng in his discernment and interpretation. During the forty years of our married life we saw together the greatest pictures of aU nations, both ancient and modern, and though, with the humility of his nature which no success ever tarnished, he continued to assert that I was his teacher in art, he yet never failed, by his words, his questions, or his silences, to throw illumination on to the subject or to discern ideas below the surface of the form. We did not announce our engagement in The Times, or talk much about it. I think we both felt that it had been reached through too much pain to bear the stereotyped hopes and congratulations of acquaintances, but the omission gave rise to a dehcious incident. We were guests at one of Mr. and Mrs. George Macdonald's large parties ; one of those unique parties given by that unique family, where they acted for their guests in the garden, and by their play unaffectedly taught the people to pray and praise. It was a gay, glad party ; and the Scotch poet, looking old even then, welcomed us all with the courtesy of a large heart. Suddenly he caught sight of me, and, be- lieving in matrimony for weal or woe, he conceived one of those ideas which all of us, who are proud to have been maiTiage-makers, hold to be inspirations. He would make a match ! he knew the very man ! So, laboriously he sought for Mr. Barnett in the crowd, convoyed him across the lawns, and Avith graceful words presented us to each other. Mr Barnett was a shockingly bad actor, but he ■i MISS OCTAVIA HILL 63 caught the cue, and we ceremomously bowed and let the dear old man enjoy the thought, when later he heard of our marriage, that he had played an important part in our hfe's drama. To us both. Miss Octavia was an exhaustless fount of interest and inspiration. Mr. Barnett felt it an honour to serve her, though his inabihty to recognise his own power made him bhnd as to its value to her. The following letter will explain what is meant ; August 1872. — I liave just left Miss Hill, and write to you because I feel so utterly helpless. She told me of all the troubles of the moment, makmg no attempt to hide or check her tears, and I had to listen, imable to help, unable even to comfort. . . Save that I listened while she talked herself out, I gave no help. . . I wonder if when more of you is in me, whether 1 shall be better able to say what "will strengthen Miss Hill. At present I feel that she is so much higher than I, that it would be absurd for me to do any more than let her feel that there is nothing I would not do for her. I could not say firmly which course I thought rights — I could only cheer her by telling her that God would care for her either way. No, it is a time when one can just pray and wait. . . Her rehance on his character is shown by the following extracts from letters which she wrote to friends — the first just after our marriage. 1873. — Mr. Young and I are like the people in the parable, he said the parish and he would go to the dogs together, T,hen Mr. Barnett left, and yet he is doing his best manfully. I was so brave to begin with, and now I have a hard fight for hope enough to get through a day. Mr. and Mrs. Barnett return on Tuesday, but I would not for the world that they saw it, for it would darken their bright entrance into their new life. July 8th, 1873. — Mr. Barnett was kind enough to come last night to do the Vv'almer Street books. It was the first time I had really had any talk to him since I came back ; it did me a great deal of good, as it always does. 1883. — I am trying to build twenty-two more cottages opening from little open square, and the Metropolitan Board call it a new street ! Mr. Barnett piloted me so splendidly through my last dQemma. I look on him rather like a wizard, and would like to ask him about a new spell ! As those ever do, who are born to lead, this wonderful lady took infinite pains with her workers and spurred them by generous recognition to still fresh efforts. On receipt of a report of some work for which Miss Octavia had left me responsible, she wrote to me as follows in September : 64 LETTERS, 1872 September, 1872. — ^Deaeest Yetta, — What a charming letter ! and, in spite of the notes of interrogation, it does not seem to me to want much answering. That is something like working to have found out the needs of the work, planned it all, written down the plan ! But you have gone a step beyond it and told me of the people, of their thoughts and characters. Oh ! when I see you doing work like this, it fills me with hope and thankfulness. The detads of the plan seem to me admirable ; this settlement of them is just what the work wanted. I wonder if there is the smallest hope of anyone taking the work up as entirely as you have done when I return, instead of my doing it. AU you say about the many ladies you have workiiig with you is full of interest to me. What a winter I look forward to among them all ! . . . I have written to ask Miss Cons about your health. I think she is more sure to speak clearly about it. I do trust that you are indeed better now. In October I went on a visit at Nottingham to my valued friends, Mr. and Mrs. Frederick Bradley. Mr. Barnett's daily letters to me during that happy period were chiefly on work, but through some of them ghmpses can be seen of his deep and tender nature. October 4iih, 1872. — I am having another such a busy day, hardly time to think of anything. There is now ten minutes for refreshment, and I take it with you. . . I don't dare to expect a letter every morning, but my heart gives a little jump if Sarah brings one in. . . Don't let writing interfere with your pleasures. I won't look onwards for to-morrow's letter, but just be content with to-day's. Enjoy yourself. . . Later. — I am home agam and it is 5.20. I am tired, dog tired, and very envious of the sleepy little animal who is one day to sit on our hearthrug and be petted by you. I just now wish you were here, and then I would lie on the rug and listen to you. There is a selfish hope, a hope for a time when I am to sit still and bask in love. I have been thinking that the bachelor's life makes one very selfish, very little considerate for the little wants of others. October 8t7i, 1872. — Your problem is a difficult one. If your dislike of the man depends only on knowledge of what was wrong in his past, it must, I think, be wrong. . . Yes, it cer- tainly would have an effect if women made themselves judges, but who is vdthout sin to cast the first stone ? We can't set ourselves up as judges, we can't make ourselves gods, we can't refuse to have mercy when we expect mercy. No, it is the present we must hate ; but when the wicked man turneth awajr from his wickedness, we dare not refuse to forgive. Here again I shall learn more when my life is filled up by your hfe, when for us both God is our home. . . LETTERS, 1872 65 There is no fear of our wanting questions to discuss, only please don't expect me to be Mr. Casaubon and know all about the rights of war, etc. I ■will only be a constitutional king and represent joui opinions and my ov.-n. . . Your description of the four daj^s' tour in the Peak district makes one's mouth water. I must get away now and then for such a time, or my work won't be valuable. Life m nature and life in humanity must be our stimulus. This dull romid of work is depressing, and I miss you — miss the talks and miss the thoughts. October lOth, 1872. — Your letter came so sweetly this morn- ing. I was feeling desperately cross and bad-tempered, when I opened it and met the love of which it was full. I was self- convinced of ingratitude and am penitent. I have cut school, and am crating to you before the bother of the day begins. I envy you your Sunday ; mine did not much help me. The noise of the children at service, the repose of the afternoon congregation, the deadness of the evening, simply wearied me. . . I have been thinking of what you said of life in country to'U'ns. Truly that is the best form of life ; in such close inter- course Avith nature we ought to live, j'et against such form there is a strong feeUng. Young men fly to London, so that they may be alone, freed from the criticism and scandal of neigh- bours ; they come here and forget that the family is, and must be, the unit of society. I don't like pet dogs. First, they take up love which belongs to higher creatures ; second, they take up food which would feed a child ; third, they carry iieas ; fourth, they smell ; fifth, they bite visitors' legs ; sixth, thej' are in the wrong place as pets. A dog to do work I admire ; a dog to be petted I hate. I don't wonder at the deep cmses of the poor when they see them ; they are signs of careless cruelty. Do you think love, tender feeling should ever take expression verj' quickly ? I am inclined to think that feeling and thought should be re- strained till it gains power or dies. This is d propos of pets, ^'^'omen feel their hearts soften towards some little animal, at once they take it ; so doing, don't you think they weaken the power of love, make it less strong to do great work ? October lAth, 1872. — Christ, you say, never gave a command about the marriage state. Christ did not come to give com- mands, but to infuse a spirit. From Him comes the life which alone makes marriage possible. He is the source of loving service. We know marriage, to Him, was a good and holy thing, for did He not speak of Himself as a bridegroom and His people as the bride ? Thank you for the flowers which came yesterday. How often signs say more than words. Flowers picked and sent by 66 REFUSAL OF COUNTRY LIVING you had their own tale of care and love. Words won't carry the spu-it's thoughts. That is why angels have not forms and voices. October I8th, 1872. — It is no good for you to remain ill. Get well at once and be content with the old ugly face, and crooked legs. What do you mean by saying it is a good thing I am thrown back on the old lot ? as if I had not deliberately and joyously chosen the new lot mth the little woman. Now in revenge I am going to make you jealous. Someone has sent me something, something beautiful and sweet, which whispers of loving care. I think I know who it is : it is a woman, young, pretty, and clever. There, what do you think of that, " sly boots " ? Well, I will tell you something more. I am very fond of that young woman, and I wish I could tell her so, but I can't — a million pounds of sweets, chocolates, and brandy balls would not express it. Flowers would not tell it, onlj' one thing can and will tell, tell of love, and that is a life. This told the world of God's love. Oh, child, I do hope my life will tell of my love. I will try that it may — now I often think I am old, dull and morose, and I feel I pain you. Let it not be, but believe through languid looks and stupid words that I am j'ours, all yours. Now good night. I have had another bachelor's dinner. Good-bye to them ; they have been quiet and pleasant. Good- bye, though, my eyes are fixed on other dinners, quieter and pleasanter, when my wife and I shall eat together. In the autumn of that year Mr. Barnett had the offer of a living near Oxford. He was tempted, for he dearly loved Oxford, and his frequent attacks of unaccountable fatigue made him turn with longing to the quiet regularity of a country life. In one of his earlier letters to me he had writte : August 9th, 187L — How delightful it must be near the sea in this weather ! One feels the temptation to country life very strong. The same sun which makes the coimtry so bright, makes London more unlovely ; the people are bad-tempered, and very often drunk — living as they do, who can wonder ? The temptation to run away must be resisted. Under the strain of sorrows and anxieties I had become stubbornly weak, and my family, strongly opposing the idea we had each cherished so long of going to East London, were unanimous in advocating the acceptance of this oppor- tunity of our living in the country. But we agreed to refuse the offer, and Miss Octavia wrote : VIEWS ON ILL HEALTH G7 14:, NoTTrNQHAM Plaob, W., September 25th, 1872. Dear Mr. Barnett, — Yetta has just written to tell me of the offer of the living near Oxford, and 3 our refusal of it. She asks me to write to you about it, and she must linow best ; but I cannot think tliat any words of mine could be of the least value to you who see so clearly and judge so rightly. . . But indeed I should have been strongly tempted to rush iato warm congratulations on your refusal. I feel so proudly thankful of and for you both for your decision. It seems to me so wholly right. And it is so very difficult to decide against a definite proposal of this kind. Many would be quite right to take the easier course ; but for one to whom the greater work had become once distinctly visible the choice of the lesser would be, to my mind, simply fatal. And yet I know how the mere fact of its possibility seems to make it look as if it were permitted and intended. I am so very thankful 3'ou both stood firm. Of course I knew it would be so with both of you ; still, it seems to have given your purpose such a groundwork to stand on. You have now done something more than picture it ; you have paved the way on which you will tread, . , As to dear Yetta's health and strength. I believe its future wiU be very much in her own hands and yours. I do not think that the East End is at all necessarily unhealthy. I do not think there is anj' parish so small, or any hfe so narrow, but that, with her nature and heart, she might easily spend, yes, even readily exhaust, all the strength she has. Her safeguard wiU. be by no means in seeking remote places — passion and pain enough are found everywhere ; it wiU lie in noble self-control. She must gain this by infinite trust that God doth not need man's works, though He lets us help Him to the extent of the power He gives ; and, secondly, in the added sense of preciousness which her otto life and vigour wiU gain, the more she is surrounded by love. She will feel that all external work, whether material or spiritual, must be done, and done well ; but that what human beings can be is often aU the best thing they can do. So your love, and all your practical -iidsdom too, and deliberate choice of what is worth while, will be her great protection, and though you wiU, I know, never selfishly spare her when the need is greatest, you will never let her waste herself in hopelessly gigantic labours. I am, faithfully yours, O OTA VIA HnxL. Is an apology owed for inserting this letter ? I think not, for it not only illustrates the wealth of that great woman's friendship, but it describes with prophetic insight the nature of my husband's protection over me. All my life I have had uncertain health, so good, so bad ; like a child rapidly very Ul, and, as he used to say, Kke "Mother Hubbard's dog " so unexpectedly recovering ; and these quick disorders alternated as I grew into middle hfe, with severe and prolonged periods of nerve failm^e, and many attacks of pneumonia. In his younger days Mr. Barnett both dishked and dis- approved of illness. He held the view of the author of 68 OFFER OF ST. JUDE'S, WHITECHAPEL Erewhon, that it was something of which to be ashamed, arising chiefly from some form of ignorance or neglect of law. So, during our early married life, I was made to feel I was naughty if I had a cold, and had aimoyed him if feminine latigue prevented plans being carried out. But as years went on and his own illnesses taught him that AviU could not always triumph, his penetrating sympathy enabled him to see deeper than the symptoms, and to tend and advise vnth the judgment that commands and the hope that heals. One adage he hked quoting : " When ill, tuck up ; when better, buck up." It was not Miss Octavia's method only to advise, and so, as Mr. Barnett had refused the Oxford hving, and we were determined to go to East London, she set to work to get us there. She wrote to Mr. Edmund HoUond who had followed the steps of Mr. Edward Denison, who in 1869 had gone to live as a layman in Stepney. Dr. Jackson was then Bishop of London, and when the hving of St. Jude's, White- chapel, fell vacant, Mr. Edmund HoUond asked that it should be offered to Mr. Barnett, who would then marry a lady who had long wished to take up work inEast London. The Bishop's letter to Mr. Barnett was kind and fatherly, the letter of a general sending a young captain to a difficult outpost. Do not hurrj' in your decision — he wrote, — it is the worst parish in my diocese, mhabited mainly by a criminal population, and one which has, I fear, been much corrupted b}- doles. We did not hurry, but made careful inquiries before deciding. The census returns of 1871 showed that the population of the parish was 6,270 (of whom the majority were males) inhabiting 675 houses, many of which were common lodging-houses. Through the parish ran one large street ; and behind it, both east and west, lay croAvded and insanitary courts and alleys. The church was a brick building with stone copings. The bricks were common and begrimed with dirt ; the stone copings were crumbling and some had fallen. Inside, huge galleries blocked the Avindows and extended half across the chu.rch, A\'hich Avas not only dark and dirty, but unAvarmed. It was a cheap structure, built by cheap thought and in cheap material, and Avas insured for only £5,300. The Vicarage stood close to the road. It was small The windows of the homes of five families. A couKT IN Whitechapel and some of its CHILDREN INHABITANTS. I. 68] ACCEPTANCE OF THE CHARGE 69 and dark, with an underground kitchen, but no area steps, and had neither pantry nor bath-room. Frank Barnett wrote : I often think of you going to that Vicarage, which, according to the Governor's account, must be very unattractive. . . I am afraid you wil] miss your friends, and there will be no neighbours to take their place. The parish organisation was non-existent, having been allowed to di'op into ruin during the long illness of the vicar, and the accounts, such as they were, showed more deficits than balances. When Mr. Barnett and I went to see our proposed home, it was one of those warm \vlnter days when drizzle seems to magnify the noise and make sunsliine a distant memory. It was market day, and the main street was filled with hay- carts, entangled among which were droves of frightened cattle being chiven to the slaughter-houses — then and now sights to shock the sensitive and encourage vegetarianism. The people were dirty and bedraggled, the children neg- lected, the streets littered and ill-kept, the beer-shops full, the schools shut up. I can recall the realisation of the immensity of our task, the fear of failure to reach or help those crowds of people, with vice and woe and lawlessness written across their faces, and how, when we got outside the vicarage and were alone in the street, standing opposite the church, came his touch on my hand and his question, " Well, which way shall we decide 1 " adding his special pet name, and my reply, as I linked my arm into his, " Let us try it ; but we may fail." At Christmas we went to stay at Mr. Barnett's home at Clifton. His uncle George was there, one of the sons of the old grandfather whose ships he had commanded for many voyages to and from Australia. He was an amusing com- panion and an excellent actor, and the Christmastide was a gay glad one, with its family gatherings, long country rides and drives, charades and dances, feasting and frohc ; my weary fiance taking physical rest in his mother's home as he did nowhere else. On our return to town, we both had much to do to con- clude our work in St. Mary's, to pay farewells to the many people we had worked with or for, and to receive good wishes of all sorts. Above them all stands out a letter from Miss Octavia, which is here given so that other yormg folk begin- ning hfe Avita love can take her words unto themselves. 70 HOPES FOR THE NEW LIFE 14, NoTTiNaHAM Place, W., January 3rd, 1873. Deabest Yetta, — I seem somehow never to have told you, though the thought never leaves me hardly, how earnestly and hopefully I long for all blessings for you in this wonderful opening year. . . But, oh ! dear, how poor all words seem to convey even any fraction of the love and hope that gather round the thought of you. One feels as if some words of blessing and of prophecy, such as the old utter sometimes for the young, would be the fittest words that go bej'ond the individual sight to what must be — by the eternal laws of God — in store for you in the time to come. . . Life seems as if it were opening out for you, with such capacities for mighty good, for so much suiiering for others to be borne, such a foundation of love and strength to support and guide you through it. It aU looks so mysterious in its infinity of joy and pain, but all lighted into clearest certainty by the consciousness that, as it was in the beginning, is now, and so it ever shall be in the years to come. . . Oh ! Yetta dear, what vistas of joy seem to be opening before you in that new home which, without associations, seems alread}' home-like, so has it grown out of all which makes a home — and the might of such a love as unites you two would make home anywhere. Work seems very beauti- ful ; but, after all, its real end would be best achieved if it could make such homes, such families as yours will be, holy and happy in themselves, but satisfied with no holiness of joy for itself, but subordinatmg aU to the service of Christ's children. It is one more of those marvellous sacrifices which have to be made continually, but which have to be made only in will, for God's best service demands that, though we are ready to resign the good thing, it should after all be retained for Him and His children to rejoice in. Thus it is for all of us with joy, with power, with many a precious thing. We give it up, and when years, perhaps, are gone, we find itself or some more precious gift our own for ever. Hold, Yetta dear, all joy thus ever as a solemn trust to be your crown for others to glory in, to bless them all with. . . Joy is indeed His great gift. Held from Him it is quite eternal and never changes or grows dim. . . It may indeed run side by side with sorrow ; yours will have even now to do this in that terrible East End ; but darling, I trust that all you have of human blessing and of heavenly hope rany so help you to pass through the shows of things as to grasp the peace, if not the joy, which passeth all understanding. I am, ever your faithful friend, OcTAViA Hill. CHAPTER VII When a man and a looman made one, hound logcthe.r by perject love strong in the strenc/th ivhich each supplies, devote their common lije to the service of all men, then doubt will grow iveaher, joy come nearer the earth, and evil lose some of its power." Tuesday, January 28th, 1873, was our wedding day. The weather was cold, but the sun shone. Mr. Barnett's two close friends, the Rector and Mr. Young, and my brother conducted the service in St. Mary's Church. In spite of my family's remonstrances, I neither had bridesmaids, jewels, nor the conventional bouquet, but as we left the church a tiny child toddled out of a group of httle scholars from a school in Walmer Street which my husband had carried on, and gave me a beautiful bunch of flowers bought by their pennies, a tender tribute to his work. Of our marriage Miss Miranda HiU wrote : Did I tell you that Mr. Barnett, the curate who has worked with Octavia so admirably in St. Mary's, has just married Siiss Henrietta Rowland, one of Octavia's best workers '! And nov/ they are going to live and work in the East End ! Octavia thinks it is such a splendid thing to have such a ma.n at work do-mi there — she thinks it quite a nucleus of fresh life ; and Mrs. Barnett, of whom Octavia is very fond, is admirably fitted for the work too. The wedding was very touching — the Church was crowded with poor people ; even the galleries were filled with them. The wedding was from the house of my sister and Mr. Ernest Hart, who with their usual generosity welcomed Mr. Barnett's friends as well as his and my famiUes. Of it Mrs. Hill wrote to her daughter Mrs. Maurice : The Bametts' wedding was a very beautiful one. The Church was full. All Walmer Street,^ Circus Street, and Barrett's Court were there. The presents were shown in the drawing-room, aU beautiful and touching. Mr. Fremantle made a most deUghtful speech at the breakfast. The 1 Vv'ahner Street was where Mr. Barnett held his club and the little school. Circus Street was my district, and it was in Barrett's Court that I had spent three nights a week in night schools. 71 72 WEDDING DAY breakfast was, Octavia says, " magnificent, regardless of expense, but beautiful." They drank from the loving-cup — rthich was an immense gilt bowl. Whoever drinks, chrinks standing and those on each side stand also while he drinks ; the custom arose, they say, to guard from assassina- tion. The bride looked lovely in magnificent white silk or satin, Ocky does not know which, rich but simple, and a long white lace veil. She was pale, with a flush added, kept up throughout in the best spirits, and was very sweet. Mr. Bamett kept introducing people to Ocky, and on leaving, he andMrs.Bamett gave her a present,! don't know what.'- Ocky looked her handsomest and best self. She wore her blaek silk and a half-mourning bonnet, remarkably becoming. She was bright, and on her return amused us much at dinner by anecdotes. She sat at breakfast next to Mr. Fremantle. The bridal two left town at half-past four and were to stop at Winchester en route for the Isle of Wight. Mr. Young has given a desk exactly like that in his own room as " a reminder of old days," and the presents are all of that sort shomng genuine feeling. Miss Octavia' s gift was a picture of primroses in a bare spring wood, painted by ]\Irs. Harrison of the old Water- Colour Society. In sending it she wrote : 14, Nottingham Place, W,, January 24d,h, 1873. Deakest Yetta, — I send a small gift for the new house for you both. I thought it would bring thoughts of life and spring-time to the East End. But all that makes spring blessed, life and loveliness, sense of growth, and of sunlight from above, and all the mystery of the future Ufe hidden in the folded buds of the present — all this you take with you in yourselves to that dear and wonderful new home. May spring in this sense be with you both, not only now in the opening life, but on and on eternally, lighting 3'ou through the long years and beyond them. I am, ever faithfully yours, Octavia Hill. We had five weeks away and spent most of it visiting carefully the cathedrals of Winchester, Sahsbury, and Exeter. We rode a good deal, but the weather was iDitterly cold, and I recall many days indoors at the hotels when my husband read aloud to me Maurice's lectures on the Epistles, Lecky's History of Rationalism, and — note-book in hand — stiff treatises on Pohtical Economy, for his mind was so constituted that he was not happy unless he gave it daily gymnastic effort. After a Aveek spent at Chfton with his parents, and carrying away a hundred reminders of his mother's love, we returned to London and entered into work at St. Jude's, Whitechapel, on March 6th, 1873. Entered into work, but not into the Vicarage, for, owing to a long iUness, the previous Vicar had not vacated the 1 It interests ma very much that Miss Octavia did not tell her family of our wedding gift to her. It was a diamond ring, one of those I had inherited, and rich with associations. She never wore it, and I fear disapproved of it, as she did not mention it to her family. ST. JUDE'S PAEISH 73 house. Until it was ready we lived in small and frugal lodgings in Eldon Street, Finsbury, then dominated by the unceasing noise of the Goods station of the Great Eastern Railway. Day after day, evening after evening, we traversed the terrible courts lying between the parish and our rooms, returning exhausted by the work, but even more by fresh knowledge of the degradation of the people. Those dingy lodgings were, however, the background of a smaU incident which illustrates my husband's nature. His bad digestion had made him particular, not to say faddy, over his diet, but rice pudding he both hked and felt to be wholesome, and so rice pudding was specially ordered for his sole supper dish after a long Sunday's work. " I am sorry, sir," said the grim landlady, " but a mouse has drowned itself in your i-ice pudding. We have such a lot of 'em." " Poor little mouse," was ah. the hungry young Vicar said, while I felt angry with the incompetent woman who had neglected to set traps or put a cover on her lodger's pudding. But the annoyance had to be choked down, for he would say : " I would rather bear any discomfort than have you vexed." StUl, one knew that righteousness often demanded some- thing stronger than the meek acquiescence with which he bore every dehnquency when it aiJected himself. It has required a great effort of memory, besides talks with those who knew St. Jude's parish in 1873, to enable me to describe it as it then was. Its area was but a few acres, bounded on the west by the city and on the south by Whitechapel High Street, where some forty keepers of small shops Uved with their famihes. They were his parishioners, as were also the lessees of the large ware- houses which stood on both sides of Commercial Street. There were two or three narrow streets hned with fairly decent cottages occupied entirely by Jews, but, with these exceptions, the whole parish was covered with a network of courts and alleys. None of these courts had roads. In some the houses were three storeys high and hardly six feet apart, the sanitary accommodation being pits in the cellars ; in other courts the houses were lower, wooden and dilapidated, a standpipe at the end providing the only water. Each chamber was the home of a family who sometimes owned their indescribable furniture, but 1—7 74 RE-OPENING OF THE CHURCH in most cases the rooms were let out furnished for eight- pence a night, a bad system which lent itself to every form of evil. In many instances broken windows had been repaired with paper and rags, the banisters had been used for firewood, and the paper hung from the walls which were the residence of countless vermin. In these homes people lived in whom it was hard to see the hkeness of the Divine. If the men worked at aU it was as casual dock labourers, enjoying the sense of gambhng which the uncertainty of obtaining work gave. But usually they did not work ; thej^ stole or received stolen goods, they hawked, begged, cadged, hved on each other with generous indiscrimination, drank, gambled, fought, and when they became too well laiown to the pohce, moved on to another neighbourhood. In the report of an estate agent, who was employed the following year by Miss Octavia to visit some of the property with a view to purchase, occur these words : Angel Alley is in a very dilapidated condition, quite wrecks of houses. It had been sometime a den of wild Irish, but a part of it now is used as stables, and the rest the deputy landlord farms out in what he terms " furnished rooms." He complains of a neighbouring court as being the very dens of the worst of characters which injures him in letting to a better class of people, those who are either a little above the common lodging- house class or who don't like the lodging-house restrictions. He told me of another alley where the people had lived many years without paying rent, for the landlord had deserted them through fear and never being able to get any money. Such was the danger and difficulty of collecting that his wife was then suffering from an Irish attack of poker and broom- stick. I saw some of the people, and a more hideous collection of heads and more horrible-looking rooms it would be impossible to conceive. In the centre of this population stood St. Jude's Church and schools, both empty and unused. To create the machinery through which the knowledge of God and the ordering of human hfe could reach those for whose " cure of souls " my husband was responsible, was the first duty, and we lost no time. Now, after years of experience, I think it would have been better to have had the Church warmed, Ut, and cleaned before recalling the people to worship, but then we thought differently, and well do I remember the first Sunday. Six or seven old women, aU expecting doles for attending, made the congregation. The newly-engaged organist played on the damp-damaged organ, and I, who never could sing a note in tune, had to lead the singing ! The work was difficult and hard and the progress was o 5 H « 1 rrj P5 5 ,^ ,fe H STARTING PARISH MACHINERY 75 slow, but at the end of the first year — March 1874 — it was possible to report that : The congregation has risen to about thhty in the mornings, and fifty to one hundred in the evenings ; that a children's service has been started, and that a mixed choir is under training ; that the schools have been opened for boys and girls together, of whom 14i are on the register ; that adult classes have been started in French, German, Latin, arithmetic, composition, and drawing which have attracted fifty students ; that a mothers' meeting has been begun, a nurse and a mission- woman engaged, a girls' night school carried on, a maternity society initiated, a penny bank opened, a lending librarj' organised, a pension scheme inaugurated, a flower show held, concerts and entertainments given, oratorios rendered in Church, lady visitors set to work, and last but not least, a system of relief for the poor thought out and established. It sounds a dull catalogue of duU deeds, but behind each cog of the machinery was a hving principle, regulated by the flywheel of passionate desire that men should know they are " brothers and loved children of God." Fre- quently the parish machinery mU be spoken of, and so it is well to set down in my husband's words the ideas which were the " very pulse of the machine." In the first parish report he said : 1S74. — The end we have in view is that everyone may know God as a Father. . . Everj^ new scheme we propose, every plan we carry out, does its work if it throws one gleam of light on this truth. . . By those who, knowing something of the life of Christ, know what human life ought to be, the state of the people is hardly to be borne. Vv^hy must their sympathies remain torpid, while questions affecting thousands of their fellows are burning for solution ? Why must existence be so dull when in every soul a fight is raging over which God and the angels watch ? Why must pleasures be the gross ones of eating and drinking, or the degrading ones which involve in ruin the life of a fellow- creature ? All around us are such lives being led by men and women whose homes are places for sleep and not for recreation, who go out wearily to work or as wearily to watch till some street entertainment stirs their worn-out senses. A few years' experience did not lower my husband's ideals, for in 1877 he wrote : If one sentence could explain the principle of our work, it is that we aim at decreasing, not suffering, but sin. Too often has the East End been described as if its inhabitants were 76 ONE AIM AND MANY METHODS pressed down by poverty, and every spiritual effort for its reformation has been supported by means which aim only at reducing aviffering. In mj^ eyes the pain which belongs to the winter cold is not so terrible as the drmikenness ■with which the summer heat seems to fill our streets, and the want of clothes does not so loudly call for remedy as the want of raterest and culture. It is sin, therefore, in its widest sense against which we are here to fight. Sin in the sense of missing the best. . . Sin must be recognised as manifold, and anything which mars the grandeur of human life must be brought under a converting influence. Such influences are the culture which opens to men's minds the enjoyment of art and literature ; the knowledge which makes the whole world alive and binds together the human family by ties of common interest ; the religion which raises men to " the Immanuel's land," whence they see the lives of those who on earth have done the will of their Father in heaven." That all such power may be brought to bear on our people, the organisation of the parish has been started. It has been difficult to select the extracts which best convey Mr. Barnett's dominating thought. In the minds of many people he lives as a social reformer, as an active Poor Law administrator, as an ardent educationalist, but he was aU these things and many more, because his one never- sleeping desire was to help people to live their lives in relation with God. Had we not made the, to us, momen- tous decision, standing opposite St. Jude's Church that day in the rain, and had his work lain in a parish where conditions were normal, I doubt if his mind would have turned in the directions it did. He Avould then have followed the inclination of his spirit, and taught the people rehgious truths. It was because they were living under circumstances which precluded them from receiving such truths, that he poured his whole Hfe's force into improving conditions. The walls of degrading and crippUng environ- ment hid from many the hght of truth. " Throw down the walls," he cried. And there were some who, amioyed by the dust and noise of the falling masonry, accused him with hard words of being indifferent to the light, and eager only to destroy boundaries. This confusion of his aims for the people with his methods to obtain them grieved him much, and though he never replied to attacks in the Press, he took pains to explain his position to those who entrusted him with money or who joined in the work. 1876 — Jlen must live on the words which proceed from the mouth of God ; the words are many, and come tlirough many ATTENDANCE AT PUBLIC WORSHIP 77 channels. We have devoted our lives to the making kno^'sai of those words which He seems to have tanght us. The means chosen may be unusual ; we claim that they are the best fitted to the end in view. . . 1879. — The Concerts and Entertainments which have given so many an hour's amusement have at the same time lifted the cloud of care from our neighbours' lives and sho^vn them the face of One who is glad because they are glad. The Schools and Classes have given to others a glimpse of the knowledge of One who is perfect as they may be perfect. The Oratorio, as it lifted our thoughts above the petty things of life, taught us our high calling as children of a Father in heaven. Every meeting which has brought two or three together and tanght them to know one another has done something to break the barrier which prevents all men from being brothers. Mr. Barnett had many tilings to say about going to Church, and about staying away from public worship. He never asked people to come to St. Jude's, indeed liis con- versation often tended to discourage them from so doing, for it was so taken for granted that " the parson chap wanted a feller to have a look in at his shop " that it seemed advisable to state clearly that such was not his view. If the Vicar called on a family, the call was returned by an attendance at a service, and any action to reheve distress was similarly acknowledged. To teach the people that to worship was a privilege, and that prayers and praises were personal actions for which men were only responsible to their Maker was the first step towards reality in religious Ufe. But when the parishioners understood that they were not expected to go to Church to please the parson, they followed their inclinations and stayed away. 1879. — Many around us suffer from the want of knowing God. The difficulty of attracting such to Church haunts me. I wish the law would allow me more freedom m the use of prayers, and also in the use of the pulpit. . . No way seems to exist by which the spu'itual side of people can be reached. We meet as friends, but that within us which reaches out to find the good, of which all other good is but the shadow, is asham.ed to make itself kno'svn, and so, being forgotten, often sleeps. How can people be helped to love God and to trust Him ; to realise the good wfuch is not far from anyone of them, and to rest in such knowledge ? In the belief that in the crowded homes and noisy streets our neighbours had no opportunity of communing with 78 SMALL CONGREGATIONS God or possessing their souls, Mr. Barnett arranged to open the church every day for some hours, including the dinner hour, so that " those v/ho wish to read or think or pray in quietness " might come in and find peace. Over all his work there ever brooded a patience that was almost a passion. " He that beheveth shall not make haste " was the text that he most often repeated to himself and to others. To our workers he wrote : A Gospel which makes present and future depend on good- ness must by its very nature advance slowly. It is only by sad experience that men can find that rest and joy have no other foundations than right and love ; it is only gradually that they are able to fight down the temptations which beset them, and hunt every trace of selfislmess from their lives ; it is only by degrees that they can gain the sense that One is near them, waiting to help them, who is their Father. Within the first two or three years of his cure at St. Jude's its ugly galleries were removed, a warming apparatus fixed, and the Chancel re-painted, the latter by the artistic fingers of the two Miss Harrisons, who designed great panels of growing corn and vines emblematic of the Holy Com- munion. A Church Committee had been established, the music greatly improved, the west front thoroughly repaired, but the Yicar wrote : 1877. — And yet, now that all is done to the Church that I hoped to do, at the Simday services it is comparatively empty. . . . AVhy do the people not come ? I'.ianj' reasons are sug- gested : the refusal of relief, the absence of anj' terrorism in our theology, the large number of Chm-ches in comparison Mdth the Gentile population are, some would say, suflfioient causes for the emptiness of this Church. None of these causes, however, satisfy me. Few of the East End places of worship have a congregation, and we may as well face the fact that our forms of service have ceased to express the religious wants of the people. There is no fashion in the East as ui the West to induce tlie inhabitants to appear Siuiday after Sunday in the parish Church ; there is no want of occupation to make them want to turn for interest to the details of Church decoration ; they are therefore careless about the whole matter. I don't think the neglect of Church attendance implies an absence of religious feelings ; the feelings exist, but they find neither support nor expression in the means of worship which have been provided. This is a sad report to read, but it was sadder to Live through those years of disappointment. Sometimes on POSSIBLE USES OF CHURCH 79 Sunday moriaings we went together to visit places of worship in the hope of finding what both attracted and fed sick souls, and in this way we came into touch with the first efforts of the Salvation Army, and the many street preachers and exponents of strange faiths or anti-faiths in Victoria Park. We hstened to Canon Liddon and the forcible voices of the Established Church, to Mr. Stopford Brooke from liis lonely pulpit, to the great preachers of the Free Churches, and heard much that was uphfting, but nothing that seemed capable of transplanting into AVhitechapel for the awakening and satisfaction of the spiritual natures of our neighbours. 1878. — YVe must wait and watch with open eyes and open ears for the coming of the Spirit which will guide us to new ways. And wliile we waited and watched, we endured the grief of impotency : 1879. — It would be hard to exaggerate the pain which we suffer by reason of our faihu'e to use the Church ; whether we look at the building mth its capacities, or at the people with their wants. The building might be so useful, a place of rest by the wajrside of life, a school whereui forgotten lessons might be learnt again, a gate of Heaven in the midst of the earth. The people want so much rest in their anxiety, a voice for their hopes, the knowledge of themselves. It is inexpressively pain- ful to the man, placed as I am, that he cannot use such a build- ing for the help of such wants. Yet it is so. And what about the sermons preached at St. Jude's, preached often to empty bro^^'n benches, and rarely to more than 100 to 150 people ? Always thoughtful, unhackneyed, and pious, the sermons were yet hardly such as would ap- peal to uncultivated minds. Mr. Barnett usually settled on his subject on Mondays, and jotted down notes on it aU the week. Together we discussed the sermon, and I was called to hear and to criticise it in aU. the stages of its making. " On Mondays," I used to say, " it is simple, fit for a coster ; on Saturday only a philosopher could understand it." Again and again, with his awe-inspiring humihty his week's work would go into the fire, and he would begin all over again. In these early days he invariably wrote his sermons, but after a few years' experience and some evidence of appreciation, he got more courage and spoke from his notes. Sermons, however, did not seem to him to be of paramount importance. 80 INFLUENCE OF HIS FAITH " We go to church to worship God and sit with our Christed selves," Avas his teaching, and when he was present, no one could fail to feel the influence of his fervent faith. A friend wrote : March 1915. — I like best to recall the Vicar in Church. Arms some- times folded, eyes fixed and steadfast ; himself in the very presence of his God, such a sure rock to him. One felt anew the inspiration of the old prayers ; the something in his sermons to be applied to " the daily roimd and the common tasks " of our lives ; the beautifully spoken blessing — the whole of it — not half, plus two fingers — and then the quiet minutes for silent prayer. Refreshing moments near to God. Perhaps some of my readers will sympathise with, and others forgive, the following outburst written by one who, herself one of his workers since her pupil-teacher days, feels passionately the loss of Mr. Barnett's wisdom, especi- ally now when our nation is in tribulation. Well ! it is gone ! Instead of piety we get religious observances and Church mUlinery. We ask for bread and get only stones. " Ye are idle, ye are idle ; work, fight, die, and be patriotic," that is all the workers get. A Church apathetic to modern needs, that has never lifted up its corporate voice in protest against oppression and injustice by the stronger to the weaker, that has never dared to point out their duties to the rich. Is it any wonder that the average congregation is a conglomeration of self- satisfied ignorance and bigotry ? When the poor are goaded to make a reconstruction of values, as please God they will some day, then the Church may find out it has overslept itself. How often Canon Barnett's soul must have felt sorely wounded ! CHAPTER VIII " / want for the poor a love which will arouse love, and burn out the sus- picion which gifts often create. I want for them a respect ivhich will go softly before the tender flame of their faith, and cherish that sense of righteousness which pity often destroys.^' Otjr move into St. Jude's Vicarage was made in time to celebrate my birthday, May 4th, in the tiny house that was to be our home for twenty years, and there we were joined by my sister and my nurse and foster-mother, Mrs. Moore. She had always hved in my home, devoting herself to the care of my sister for whom a pre-natal accident had rendered devotion necessary. When Mr. Barnett had agreed that we should take care of them, and I had thanked him out of the fullness of my heart — for though they were both very dear to me, they were a great responsibihty — he had written : I am sure I deserve no praise. Little Fannjr will be no trouble, and we shall have the happiness of pleasing her. Nurse, as I told you, will be required to take care of you. . . Both will make the firelight of our home. All through that summer — 1873 — amid noise, smells, and degradation we worked, and then came hohday time, and we went off to Switzerland. Can any pen do justice to the first visit paid together to Switzerland of two young people who, hitherto accustomed to the surroundings of beauty and refinement, had hved for five months in the Whitechapel of that day ? We went to Lucerne, walked up the Rigi,and by G6schenen,over the Furka, to the Grimsel, across to Meiringen, on to Lauterbrunnen, and by the Wengem Alp towards home. What a good three weeks we had ! We usually started at six o'clock and walked till ten, then ate, rested, and walked again from four to six — doing about fifteen miles a day. Oh ! the glory of those morning hours, and the revelation of the hght in the valleys and the shadows on the snows. My delight was that which is only to be obtained at the introduction to the 81 82 VISITING THE PARISHIONERS everlasting hills, my husband's pleasure being, with his sympathetic nature, the even greater one of showing to his beloved the beauties in which he had so often revelled. Then our talks ! Every single thing we had not agreed on during all the past busy weeks we had saved up to discuss on our holidays, and discuss we did, he the Pegasus, ever taking wings, and I, harness in hand, trying to yoke him to earthly coaches to carry travellers onward. It was a lovely time, but it had to be cut short to give old Mrs. Barnett her annual change at Ilfracombe, after which work again claimed us and we returned to face the problems of our first winter, and among them the great one of the relief of the poor. Social conditions and thought on them have changed so much since 1873-9 that the subjects of the next few pages may seem to be too far-off for biography and too near-by for history, but as reUef and its direct and indirect influ- ences occupied so much of Mr. Barnett's mind and heart, his early thoughts on it should not be omitted. During our first year in Whitechapel we both visited the parishioners a great deal and many were the adventures we enjoyed relating to each other, interesting, amusing, pathetic, or tragic. Mr. Barnett, anxious to know and be known without the cloak of his position, unearthed some ancient mufti clothes, obtained lay headgear and, though I burnt the blue tie, went forth as unlike a parson as he could weU appear. Dehghtful were some of the tales of his reception, and touching was the readiness of even the poorest to share what they had with their unknown visitor, whom they often took for an insurance agent, though sometimes he was received otherwise if they thought he was sent by the landlord, that universal terror of the weekly tenant. Usually the people talked to him with the utmost freedom of their affairs, responding to my husband's virile though often unspoken sympathy. They rarely asked him who he was, though once when his name came out, after he had been pressed to join in the much appreciated pleasure of the black bottle, the face of his host fell. " Crikey," he said, " there's bust my old gel's chance of getting grub out of the Church," a sentence that acted as a warning if ever we were tempted to forsake our principles and unite reUef and rehgion. There were three principles underlying my husband's plans for the relief of the poor. RELIEF OF TPIE POOR 83 The equal capacity of all to enjoj^ the best, the superiority of quiet ways over those of striving and crjang, character as the one thing needful, are the truths on which we take our stand.' In explanation of how these principles were carried out, he wrote : 1874. — The relief of the poor is a matter which I hold to be of the greatest importance. Indiscriminate charity is among the curses of London. To put the result of our observation in the strongest form, I would say that " the j)oor starve because of the alms they receive." The people of this parish live in rooms the state of which is a disgrace to us as a nation. Living such a life, they are constantly brought into contact with soft-hearted people. Alms are given them — a shilling by one, a sixpence by another, a dinner here and some clothing there ; the gift is not sufficient if they are really struggling, the care is not suffi- cient if they are thriftless or wicked. The effect of this charity is that a state of things to make one's heart bleed is perpetuated. The people never learn to work or to save, out-relief from the House, or the dole of the charitable, has stood in the way of providence, which God their Father would have taught them. Our experience has this j^ear been terrible. Young men and women who have spent their lives in these courts have come begging ; they have never been taught to read and write, or encouraged to believe that it is their duty to support them- selves. When sickness overtook them it has found them un- prepared ; and this is stUl going on, for kind-hearted people by gifts of food and clothing are now educating another genera- tion to lead this terrible life. I wOl tell you our plan. When someone comes begging, I myself see him, talk to him and send him to the Charity Organisa- tion Societj', who investigate the case, not so much with a view of finding out the applicant's deserts as to show us, from his past life, the best means of helping him in the present. A committee, composed of ilr. liicks, ilrs. Barnett, j.ii. Rowland, Mr. Polj^blank, and mj^self , meet on Friday evenings, before which the man is summoned to appear. Perhaps it proves to be the best plan to give him efficient assistance in the shape of a sub- stantial gift, or a loan ; perhaps the most hopeful way of helping him wiU be by a stern refusal. In neither case does our watch- ful care cease. V/hen there was been no interference we have seen success attend out efforts — the family has commenced to save ; the children sent to school ; the girls to service ; but when visitors, no less kind, but less wise, have come hi with their doles of sixpences, or their promise of help, we have seen the chains of idleness, carelessness, and despair fall again aroimd ^ Introduction to the second edition of Practicable Socialism (ilessrs, Longmans, Green & Co.). 84 ANGRY APPLICANTS the family. . . Money pauperises the people ; time, given as a child of God to those who, if degraded, are still our brothers, ■will ennoble and strengthen them. It seems superfluous to describe such a simple scheme as this for readers to whom " case-papers," " investigations," " personal service," " societies," are the recognised A.B.C. of philanthropic effort, but in those days, forty-five years ago, it was new and aroused a great deal of anger. The people considered that alms were their right and came at all hours to the Vicarage to demand money or tickets, sup- porting their appeals with hes, noise, and threatened violence. Sometimes after they had been refused, they would teU their grievances to the passers-by, who, collecting into an indignant crowd, would thunder at the door and throw things at the windows, occasionally breaking even the thick glass provided in the Ecclesiastical Commissioners' buildings. At first there was no choice but to stand the siege until the crowd dispersed, but later a door was cut from our house into the Church through which the Vicar could slip out to fetch the poUce. What horrible ten minutes those were to me, in case he should be caught and roughly handled by the poor low creatures who, many of them being only nightly tenants of the " furnished rooms," knew nothing of him except that he refused to give what he had and they wanted. For each and all he had confident hope of their ultimate righteousness, and wrote : 1875. — By actions as by words we tell men that the King- dom of Heaven is within them, that all they can want will be found when they have become good and pure and loving ; and we tell them, too, that God who loves them is working to make them all they ought to be. Lest we should interfere with that working, we give nothing to those who should have provided for themselves ; lest we should seem to put the body's wants above those of the soul, we let no suffering tempt us so to act as to make the sufferer forget that sin is terrible. It sounds a clear principle, but living up to it was a source of much pain ; the pain of seeing suffering and knowing the sufferers were angry and had hearts full of hatred for us ; the pain of being thought hard and callous by others who, also caring for our neighbours, were working for their good ; the pain of uncertainty as to the value of the virtues we were trying to inculcate at the expense of kindliness and gratitude ; and the pain of doubt which comes to all humble- minded reformers, as to whether they, the few, can be INJUSTICE OF CARELESS RELIEF 85 right, and those, the many who differ from them, all wrong. Two years after Mi-. Barnett had described the plan he wrote : 1876. — ^Ye have abided by our tried plans, and our mode of working is having a slight eifect on others who work in our neighbourhood, but it is still very trying to see the terrible spiritual and temporal harm which follows on unwise gifts. A very few pence tempt the poor to make a pretence of religion, and to linger on in their \vretched rooms till death overtakes their hah-starved bodies. There are children who seem to have been starved, because their parents have been led to trust in casual help which proved to be inadequate to their needs. . . . Careless gifts have been a source both of suffering and of sin. Abhorrent as was the sin of injustice to Mr. Barnett, it was specially so when it affected class relations, and was brought into existence by the action of wealth on poverty. 1878. — I wish charitable people could become more sensible of the injustice done by unwise reUef. It is often said, it is best to err on the side of giving ; seeing what I see I am disposed to say it is best to err on the side of refusing. The damage to the body of the applicant is less real and more distant than the damage to his spirit. We cannot, however, expect to welcome a charity fitting the knowledge of the present day, till money gifts cease to be an insurance against the discontent of the poor, a pro- pitiation for the enjoyment of luxuries, or a relief to the giver. Gifts must be the expression of real and intelligent interest. Far then from wishing to stand in the way of relief, I appeal for more relief. . . If this East End is to be helped, it must be by those Christ-like enough to give their best to those that ask. And from the apphcants also he demanded their best. If a man who was able-bodied begged, it made him indignant, and if lying was added to the begging, anger was added to the indignation. I recaU my surprise when one evening, a conversation with an apphcant being unusuaUy prolonged, I came out of the drawing-room just in time to see my small hthe husband seize a much bigger man by the collar, and with a firmly placed knee in his back violently eject him from the house. I was shocked, perhaps as much at the deadly pallor which the exertion had caused as at the loss of temper, but Mr. Barnett only said, " He lied as well as begged and deserved what he got." Slowly, sternly, and with much sacrifice, the principles were worked out, and by degrees the people began to 86 MR. AND MES. JAMES STUART understand something of the friendship which had prompted the refusals that to them had seemed so cruel. In the report of 1870 Mr. Barnett wrote to our workers : We. would urge you very strongly never to give unless you are certain that your gift will thoroughly meet the needs of the applicants. It was those words translated into action and affecting the Uves of the few famiUes who were ready to make efforts which acted as object-lessons, and both explained the Vicar's views and stimulated by example the efforts of others towards worthier attainments. Before my memory's eye I can see James Stuart, a tall gaunt man, " earning his starving," as he called it, by hawking broken quartz on a barrow. He came before the little Committee. " I'm stony broke, sir, as stony and as broke as my stock. People is too poor to buy mantel ornaments." " Will you hme- whiten the cellars ? " asked my husband. " Lime-whiten the Heavens or t'other place, if I had a brush and a pail and was paid for it." The materials were suppUed and the job executed. The wife, miserably frail from semi- starvation, was about to be coirfined. For her suitable arrangements were made and later she was sent with the sweet httle baby for a change in the country. Clothes for the two children on whom attendance at school \\'as enforced were provided, and a loan enabled the family to move out of their " furnished rooms." Thus " thoroughly " aided, the family by its industry, resourcefulness, and sohdity of character was kept independent and something more. To us they became real friends and trusted fellow-workers, though to some Stuart's satisfaction at his independence was an offence. One lady, writing of her memories of those days, said : To create a sturdy self-helpful independence was to the Vicar a supreme essential. I remember that at the death of a. Mr. Stuart, a carpenter, Mr. Barnett in the pulpit the following Sunday paid a definite tribute " to the man's sturdy independence." Why ! he was positively rude, but the Canon could forgive that. After Stuart's death the family left Whitechapel, the daughters grew up and married, and the mother went to share their homes, keeping in friendly touch with us, and we visited her whenever we were near her. After her death her daughter continued the correspondence, and in her last MR. AND MRS. MARSHALL 87 letter, after telling me in detail of her three sons who are serving in the navy and army, and thanldng me for the gift of Worship and Work, said : 1914. — What a true jihoto of our dear Canon, but I think he looks rather sad. . . I can remember him so well when he first came to Whiteohapel. How bright and hopeful he was, and what a great work he has done for the East End of London ! Do jo\i remember now those early days ? God bless you, dear, and give you strength to continue the great Fight here below, and fit us all for that glorious Inheritance that is the right of the Children of God. To the old it was possible to give thoroughly so as to meet their needs, and among the masterpieces in the por- trait gaUery of my memory's heroes stand out some of those old Whitechapel people, verily the moral aristocracy of the poor. No one could be much uglier than old Mi's. Marshall, short, fat, shapeless, with smaU sunken eyes, coarse features, and scanty hair, and yet old Marshall loved her with his youth's and his manhood's love. " The rats they're getting that cheeky. There's no scaring of 'em," he said one day as I was standing in the filthy court just outside his one-roomed home. " Last night they corned on our bed. My missus, she'd been sadly- hke all day, and had just dropped off, when up comes one and runs about quite frisky." " What did you do ? " I asked. " Do ? Why, just nothink. What could I do ? If I'd moved I should have woke 'er up — but I watched a bit." I seemed to see the halo round his dirty head, and smeU the holy aroma of sacrifice amid the odour of his iinwashed clothes. He hawked groundsel, and, though Mving amid such dreadful conditions, had thought it his duty to adopt no less than four orphans, one after another, and " bring them up respectable though humble," he said with pride. To the question "Were they your relations?" he repMed quite simply : " No, we knew nothing of their belongings. They were just deserted, poor things ! by that low lot round at the ' Dosshouses,' and we couldn't let them go to the ' 'Ouse.' " To meet the Marshalls' simple wants and aid them " thor- oughly " were not beyond the powers of charity, and they were delighted in being accepted as tenants in the first block of new dweUings. Mrs. Johnson was shrewd, hard-featured, shriU-voiced, 88 PENSIONS TO THE OLD thin, clean, frugal, rich in prolific descendants and proud of their respectability. She had no halo, but it was a cruelty that she could only obtain the help she needed by begging for doles or tickets, and so she was " thoroughly " aided by a regular gift ' or pension. Indeed it was our friendship with a few of these admirable men and women which re- sulted in the formation of the first Pension Committee, the forerunner of the national scheme which prevails to-day. My husband, writing about the money expended on pensions in 1873, said : The old people are thus enabled to live without begging and without anxiety. . . By this means we may give rest to the anxious longings of some old men and women to finish their days amid the surroundings of home, and we may spread among the young that reverent tenderness called out by an old age spent in their midst and found in the way of righteousness. The world loses more than it knows when such fives are left in our workhouses to wear away in sorrowful uselessness. And they loved us so truly, those East London friends. Harriet Smith was a folder at a wholesale stationer's, but her money troubles brought out so sensitive a nature and so high a sense of duty that we advised our friend. Miss Teape, to employ her as a mission woman. For years she generously spent herself as she rendered, alike to good and bad, clean and dirty, self-forgetful service. Once I gave her a handsome ancestral jet brooch, and of course forgot all about it. A few weeks after I was left alone — June 1913 — she came to see me at the Cloisters and brought the brooch reverently treasured in wool. " I want you to take it," she said, " in memory of our Canon; it's the best thing I've got," and she added, "you can wear it now." After she was too old to continue her work Miss Teape pensioned her, and though I wooed her to live in idylhc surroundings in the Garden Suburb she would not leave her " mothers." Last night she died in her sleep — July 19th, 1916. She had no illness, "only troubled by incommoding breathlessness," as she had written me. As the district visitor who tended her left her, she said : " I should hke Mrs. Barnett to know that I am not very well to-night, but not to trouble her, please, with my best respects." Could last words be more faithful and humble ? REV. BROOKE LAMBERT 89 The following is from a Whitechapel friend : June 16t.h, 1915. Deae Mks. Baenett, — I want you to get this letter on Thursday in memory of Canon Bamett's passing. I am sure I shall never forget his kindness. May God rest his dear soul in peace. Amen. But the comparatively few who were " thoroughly helped" did not compensate the hundreds who were refused the doles they sought. Before we went to St. Jude's £.500 a year had been supphed by a West-end parish and had been distributed without S3'stem. Of that period the Rev. Brooke Lambert, who in the winter of 1879 took charge of our parish to allow us to go to Egypt, wrote : 1880. — I thank God I have lived to see the parish of St. .Jude's in a different condition from that in which I once knew it, when every winter day a crowd of from 60 to 100 might be seen outside the Church door waiting for those fatal tickets, which are like a rotten rope thrown to a drowning man, because they create a hope, which no ticket system can ever realise, and make the person who gives them think he is satisfying the needs of the poor, whilst he is only increasmg their shiftless dependence. Let any one follow a few cases out, instead of giving broadcast, and he will soon see what it means. Let it not be thought that it is easy work to conduct charity on this reformed system. It is heart-breaking work. Once this winter I thought I must give it up, but, thanks to the Charity Organisation without and the band of hearty workers withm, we pulled through. And it is satisfactory to know that in a wmter unusually severe, and at a time when depression in trade had left the poor in a very bad condition to meet it {the pa^vnshops were all, I fear, f uU), there has been no case of starvation in St. Jude's, Whitechapel. It is more satisfactory to know that in the opinion of those best capable of judging, holiday times are much better spent, and that Christmas and Easter have passed over our heads with fewer of the orgies which generaUj' attend these celebrations. It was the sense of impotency, caused by hving in the midst of people whose needs, spiritual, mental, and physical, ever cried for remedy, it was the knowledge that we could neither woo them to worsliip God nor break down their suspicion of man, that made us ready to take any step that would bring us nearer to them. Among the possible steps we considered that of leaving the Vicarage and hving in a few rooms in Crown Court, where Mr. and Mrs. Marshall hved, one of the worst of the courts where the inhabitants used their OTvn furniture, but not so bad an alley as those wliich were occupied only by nightly tenants. We argued to each other that perhaps we should learn more of our neighbours if we shared their sufferings, and that, servant- less, we should reahse the disadvantages of no copper, no oven, no sink, no water-tap, no lavatory, no cupboards, no 1—8 90 PLAN TO LIVE IN CROWN COURT coal-ceUar, no bath ; drunken neighbours, noisy children, a common staircase, a boltless front entrance, windows which could not open, doors which would not shut, and partitions which admitted every sound. I was very keen to do it, but with what I now recognise to have been deeper wisdom, Mr. Barnett felt that, however steadfastly we kept to our self-imposed hmited income, the conditions would not bear with the same force on us as they cUd on those who could not escape them, for we, conscious of possessions, would be conscious also that we could step out of the cripphng environment at any time. Moreover, we should not have the fear of old-age poverty ever before our eyes. But the vivid planning for our own hves under the same circumstances as prevailed over the hves of our neighbours brought those circumstances into daily thought and made for housing reform. Whether we should ever have taken the step 1 cannot say, for just before the attempt might have been made, Mr. Barnett became ill with phlebitis and complications which puzzled the doctors. On this iUness Mrs. Hill wrote to her daughter, Mrs. Maurice : We are anxious about Mr. Barnett. Mrs. Barnett wrote last night to Ockey saying he had nearly fainted again, and he " did not see the good of lying there " — they " wanted Miss Octavia to write them one of her own letters." In short the doubt he has always had about himself seems beginning to depress her in spite of that well of joy and love which Mrs. Barnett has in herself. Ockej' saw him on Saturday. He has to lie with his arm supported by piUows at right angles with his body and never to move it. Ockey says he looks grand — almost supernatural. One can fancy what a young, strong, ardent man like him must be going through mentally. The pam he says is not much, only discomfort. Dr. Ernest Hart is extremely hopeful ; the other doctors are silent, they say they never saw a case quite like it, and do not hazard an opuiion. His mother is with them, and the wife and mother work most afiectionately and harmoniously together. Mr. Barnett is of course anxious that all should go on as much as possible as if he were about, and as he is well except for this local matter, the parish business is directed by him through BIrs. Barnett. Ockey went off this morning before breakfast to ask Mr. Young to go down to them to-daj'. They had a long talk about Mr. Barnett. Mr. Young is very grave about it. They attribute the mischief to a blow from a ball while playing at rackets. I think the general impression is that he wiU recover, but I fear it will be a tedious affair. Many are the incidents during that illness — the ridiculous frolics indulged in with my husband's mother to amuse our patient ; the wearying search for " guinea-pigs " to take the services on Sunday, who when found were a curious REV. MILES ATKINSON 91 set of perfunctory Christians ; the encUess dirty apphcants for charity, who, knowing the Vicar was ill, were for ever knocking at the door to claim the promises Avhich they invented he had made. But he recovered, which was just all that mattered to both mother and wife, though the long illness had made a curate necessary. When the Rev. Miles Atkinson and his sister Mary joined us, his advent was announced in words which not an action in his aU too short life behed : He is devoting himself to work which is not attractive. He believes in God and duty, and looks to find in you helpers and fellow-workers. CHAPTER IX " In the richest country of the world the great mass of our countrymen live without the knowledge, the character, and the fullness of life which together make the best gift of this age." Holidays always played a large part in our lives. The strenuous conditions in which we hved made it necessary frequently to leave Whitechapel, and as we both liked traveUing, we arranged hohdays which fed us with beauty and enriching memories. The year after my husband's long illness we again went to Switzerland, but he had a recurrence of the same trouble just before we left England, and so the hohday was clouded with anxiety about his health. He was also consumed with nervous restlessness, so that no sooner had we arrived at one place than he began to plan to leave it, while the magnitude of the walks he arranged kept us both unrested. One from Chamonix to Courmayeur over the Col du Geant was never forgotten, for we accom- phshed it in three days in spite of heat and %Adnd. After that I was ill with fatigue, and so we had to drive down the beautiful Aosta Valley and pause amidst the mtching charm of the Italian lakes. But not for long, and the beauties of Monte Generoso and Monte Motterone Lugano and Orta are blurred and entwined with recoUections of painful exhaustion, for " walk for walking's sake " had become a fetish. But as my husband got better he rested more, and on our return we were both able to do the winter's work of ] 87-1-5. One of its pleasant duties was laying down the Hnes by which for many years we obtained good music for our neighbours. In the first Parish Report Mr. Barnett -wrote : 1874. — The oratorio of the "Messiah " was performed during Advent in the Church by a large choir ; the effect was very grand, and in the solemn silence which followed each burst of glorious sound, we felt that the people were iudeed worshipping God. 92 GENEROSITY OF MUSICIANS 93 In the following years more Oratorio Services are recorded : 1875. — The foiir musical services during the spring were got up by friends in the West End, and gave immense dehght to the large congregations which assembled each week. The experi- ence confirms my belief as to their spiritual value. Grand music, heard in a Church with which many associations of a higher life are connected, seems to have the power of expressing the aspirations and holding the attention of those whose lives are for the most part low and uncontrolled. . . The music would, I think, help many, whom sermons fail to touch, to possess their souls. It might be possible to have such musical services at fortnightly intervals, and in the intervening weeks to have lectiures. The oratorios will reach the emotions, the lectures the reason of the people, and both may, perhaps, be brought into religion instead of bemg let run to waste in impure excite- ment and godless speculations. The generosity of musical people, whether professional or amateur, was wonderful. Never was a request made to them in vain. The value of their talents to the poor had but to be assured, and they were offered unstintingly, regardless of bad weather outside, or hot air laden with smoke or smells inside. How they arise — those singers and players — and file before my memory as I write, including among them the eager imperfect service of unknown Mr. Smiths and Miss Joneses up to talent which has earned fame for names such as Miss Fanny Davies, Miss Anna WilHams, Lady Cohn Campbell, Madame Clara Butt, Mr. Heathcote Statham, Miss Susie Lushington. Widely different, both in capacity and reputation, as were these musicians, they aU sang the same note of desire to " hurry to be helpers and prove the kinship of mankind." And it was not only the leaders who were thus generous. Every winter for many years the large choirs of musical societies, West-end churches, and schools of music came " to make a joyful noise " for our people, and in those days the gift was larger, because the means of transit were fewer. The Underground only extended as far as Moorgate Street ; the omnibuses were slow and rattled noisUy down Oxford Street, then paved "with iU-fitting stones. But they journeyed East- wards, those helpful men and women, and after their music had swept our weary and often degraded neighbours " away from the wearing pettiness of life," they came for refresh- ment into the little Vicarage, and there many friendships were born and fresh fellow- workers yoked together. 94 ORATORIOS IN ST. JUDE'S CHURCH "It is years ago, and you wiU have forgotten me," is said often to me stiU, " but I came to your house after we had sung in the Church," and then is sometimes added, " I can never forget that service or that congregation." Neither can I. As long as memory lasts, I shaU see those long brown pews crowded with people ; I shall smell the sickening odour of their clothes and persons ; I shall recall the yearning expressions of their uphfted faces as they were caught up by the music beyond their carking cares ; I shall hear their sobs, as, moved out of their normal dumbness, they bowed their heads with "no language but a cry" ; I shall hear the mighty wave of sound as all rose and sang together " God, our help in ages past," and after the thunder, thank God, I can still recall " the still small voice " as, in absolute silence, my husband blessed us, and his blessing made men pray. After what has been said of the generosity of musical people, the simple entry in the 1877 report wiU not be unexpected : Musical services and lectures have been given at fortnightly intervals during the winter months. The following is a hst : Nov. 1. Harvest Festival. Jau. 25. Oratorio, "Messiah." „ 8. Lecture, " Eastern Politics." ,, 31. Lecture, "Egypt." „ 15. Oratorio, " St. PauL" Eeb. 7. Oratorio, "HymnofPraise." „ 22. Lecture, " Socrates." ,, 14. Lecture, " Mazzini." „ 29. Oratorio, " Elijah." ,, 21. Oratorio, "Elijah." Dec. 6. Lecture, " Fair Play." ,, 28. Lecture, "Buddha." „ 13. Oratorio, " Crusaders." Mar. 7. Oratorio, "Creation." ,, 20. Christmas Carols. „ 14. Lecture, " Democracy." Jan. 11. Carol Service. ,, 21. Oratorio, "Messiah." „ 18. Selections from Oratorios. The quahty of active imagination for the hunger and thirst of starving spirits is not a common one, and still rarer is it to select for their food a form of sustenance which does not appeal to a personal taste, but this is what took place when my husband started oratorio services in Church. Of how music might express, and, by expressing, create the deeper yearnings of dumb humanity, he wrote : A moving picture might be drawn of those who wanting much can express nothing. Here are men and women, bone of our bone, flesh of our flesh ; who have that within them which raises them above all created things, powers by which they are allied to all whom the world honours, faculties by which they might find unfaihng joy. But they have no form of irUSIC IS A PARABLE 95 expression, and so thej^ live a lower life, walking by sight, not by faith, giving rein to powers which find their satisfaction near at hand, and developing faculties in the use of which there is more pain than joy. . . 3.1usic would seem fitted to be in tliis age the expression of that 'v^'hich men in their inmost hearts most reverence. Creeds have ceased to express this and have become symbols of divi- sion rather than of unitJ^ Music is a parable, telling in sounds which will not change of that 'wliich is worthy of worship, tell- ing it to each hearer just in so far as he by nature and circum- stances is able to understand it, but giving to all that feeling of common life and assurance of sympathy which has in old times been the strength of the Church. By music, men may be helped to find God who is not far from any one of us, and be brought again -within reach of that tangible sympathy, the sympathy of their fellow-creatures. ^ Of the effect of music on himself he spoke in one of his letters to me from Clifton in 1883 : Here I am in Frank's drawing-room. Yly ears full of the music Loulou has been making. Great is the power of music, but I don't think it would find me if I had not a certain intellectual power of living with the sounds in a life which they create. I wonder if our people less educated rejoice simply in the sensation, or feel that music opens the view of a life ia wliich they them- selves live or might live. It was strange that Mr. Barnett should feel as he did the influence of music, for he had neither taste for nor training in it. He could not sing, and had ilo ear either for time or tune. Indeed, neither he nor I were ever quite sure of " God save the Queen " until the other people stood up. This, during our visit to India, led to some embarrassing moments, when one's native friends, anxious to show their loyalty to our Queen, started in unexpected keys and on unknown instruments the honoured tune, and were met with no corresponding change of posture in us. In those days it was not the practice to have any but the ordinary Church services usually dully rendered, and the oratorios in St. Jude's raised much opposition among those who scented " Rome " in every innovation. Indig- nant righteous men sent by indignant righteous organisa- tions stood outside the Church and rebuked those who went in, offering in violent words their opinion of the future climate to be endured by the Vicar and all who 1 Practicable Socialism (new series). Published by Messrs. Longraans, Green & Co., 1914. 96 BIRTH OF THE PEOPLE'S CONCERT SOCIETY aided Mm. So angry were they, and so angry did they make the large and rough congregations, that the aid of the pohce had to be obtained to prevent breaches of the peace. People holding other opinions saw in the services signs of budding ecclesiasticism in Mr. Barnett, only to be disappointed when his reforms included a choir of men and women, evening Communion, and the offer of the Sacra- ment to all who " truly and earnestly repent." But there were some people who would not enter a church, and to them the saving grace of fine music had to be offered. Of the winter of 1877-8 Mr. Barnett wrote : 1878. — On two Sunday evenings in December Herr Franke gave classical concerts in our schoolroom. I tried to find a room better suited to the purpose, but theological or legal obstacles stood in the way. There was a large demand for tickets which were freely given, and it need hardly be said that the music was perfect of its kind, very unlike any commonly heard in these parts. It seemed, though, entirely to capture the minds of the audience, and during some of the difficult pieces there was not a movement in the room. I explained that I was introducing the music in no irreligious spirit, but simply because I believed such music would in the truest sense help the people to be religious. We shall, I hope, have some more of such concerts. Somehow Sunday must be rescued from its present degrada- tion, saved from being a day of sleep, feasting, and working, to become a day of learning, enjoyment, and rest. Somehow the people must be brought within the refining influence such as that which comes from knowledge of the best things within men's reach. . . Holding as I do the perfect lite to be the result of all good influences, I try to blend with the other good influences of Sunday, the good influence of music, so that all may work together to give to the people fullness of hfe." The next winter there were sis concerts, and then it is reported : 1879. — Very much as the result of the concerts held in our schoolroom, the People's Concert Society has been formed, its object being to spread the taste for high-class music ; that such music would find a response in the minds of those for whom it is not often performed has been justified by our experience . . . — an experience which the splendid work of the People's Concert Society has now made an article of commonly accepted social faith. During the first year at St. Jude's my husband had invited weU-known clergymen to give lectures in Church LECTURES IN ST. JUDE'S CHURCH 97 on subjects of daily life such as marriage, education, and politics. The foUomng year he wrote : 1874. — It seems useless in a neighbom-hood in which Churches are so numerous, that the same service should be provided in each for a very few attendants. If in our Chiu'ch we could have a lecture on a subject of common interest, we might possibly afford a means of worship and education to those who make no use of existing means. . . It is bj^ knowing grand lives, by feeling their hearts bow before the men who have been heroes in daily life, that men now living will themselves live higher lives and find out God. . . If by our lectmes we are able to show them how true human greatness depends on reasonable religion, though we ourselves are unable to provide those means of worship which will give strength to their longmgs for life and fuller life, and satisfaction to their wants to know the imlinown God, we may yet feel that we are doing something in our day to prepare the way for such worship of the future. After sis years' experience the Vicar chronicled the failure of his hopes : 1879. — During the last winter we have had lectures on Car- lyle, Milton, Spinoza, Chaucer, John Broivn, Howard, Sir T. Moore, Savonarola, Wesley, i'ilarcus Aurelius, Epictetus, Sir Harry Vane, and Jerome. . . I hoped that interest in great lives would have drawn those to Chiuoh who, not being great, are yet brothers of the great. The result has not justified my hope. The lectures have been good, but there have been at most 100, and sometimes as few as twenty listeners. . . SJy one object is to make the Church serve the needs of the soul, the need which all have for the wider, fuller life, which is called " eternal " life. . . What will be the worship of the future none can say. We only know that it will grow out of the effort of those who, in the present, strive to approach the highest. Such effort must take various forms. At that time, forty-five years ago, it was usual for the children of Church schools to attend the ordinary services. They were allotted a place apart where they fidgeted, coughed, played surreptitiously, and hated the services with the Uvely intensity of youthful hatred. With my husband's sympathy with children, and his desire that everyone should think rationally, he arranged with Mr. Leonard to start a children's service. He wrote — 1874 : It is better for children to attend a service which they under- stand than to go through forms intended to express the wants 98 MR. EDWARD LEONARD and hopes of those who know and feel the sin and sorrow of the world. The children came in goodly numbers to the schools, where they were tenderly taught interesting religion. Three years after the services began the Vicar reported : During Mr. Leonard's absence, through illness, I had the opportunity of taking his service. I have never been more delighted than by the evident interest and devotion shoAvn by the children. When people are alive, it is not usual to write about them, but as Mr. Edward Leonard held a unique position in our Uves, I am going to tell how at twenty-four he gave up a promising career to go to Whitechapel, where he lived on his small private means in order, hand in hand with us, to face the wrongs and woes of the poor. When liis weakly health compelled him to leave East London, my husband wrote : The poor to whom he so freely gave himself, the children to whom he was a brother as well as a teacher, the fellow- workers to whom his unfailing patience often encouraged, have all sadly missed him. Though his name is little knoAvn among East-end workers, there is not one of those whose names are emblazoned in books or pamphlets who did better work than he did. A life such as his is rich in good, and those who enjoy the good, fail- ing to discover the doer, thank only the God he served. It was great comfort to have a man who, from the very beginning of our work, had not only love for us but faith in our methods, so often blamed or despised ; indeed he was the first of our settlers, and when we had to name the first Settlement — 1884 — we felt that it would have been more appropriate to call it " Leonard " Hall, instead of after Arnold To3Tibee, who had been a loved and welcome visitor, but in no sense an East London settler. My husband's gift to me on one of the first of the many birthdays we spent together should be recorded. As I disUked luxuries, and had inherited most things which brought legitimate comfort, he found it difficult to select presents, and so some weeks before this particular May 4th, he had asked me what I would hke to have. " A policeman," said I promptly, " to stand at the corner of the Wentworth Street group of courts and alleys and stop the fights." " I never heard of such a present," was his surprised GIFT OF A POLICEMAN 99 reply, " but I will try." And when the day came, on my plate amid the flo\\'ers lay the letter from the poUce authorities saying that an officer should be put upon the district indicated. With the pohce Mr. Barnett was always on excellent terms, and he frequently testified to the splendid quahties which their disagreeable and difficult duties called forth. " I stood aside and watched the pohce handle the matter, and marvelled at their patience under really almost unendur- able provocation," I recall him saying when a certain Mrs. Odell, herseK only half sober, was fighting with her tipsy husband, and who, having been parted by the constalale, again united to turn their angry lists and ugly tongues on him. The attitude of the httle crowd is on such occasions a subtle influence, and one never to be reckoned on. It appears only to judge from the surface, but often the judg- ment is not superficial, for when aU hve so closely together, the character of everyone is known intimately, and not infrequently the intervention of the pohce in a street row seems to be an interference with justice, meted out at last. My husband put high value on the influence of the poHce ; and instead of complaining to headquarters when things were not quite aU they ought to be, he invited the district officers to come and talk over the difficulty. Those who came to these informal taUis have borne testimony to the encouragement they obtained in their work — so often unrecognised and unappreciated ; of the suggestions which seemed to lift duU routine into a possible mission ; and of the courtesy, which while stimulating greater effort for virtue and keener scent for wrong, yet never forgot that the speaker was an outsider talking to an official, whose hfe's work was under discussion, and M^ho had to bear " the burden and heat of the day." Years spent in East London brought us iato friendly contact with large numbers of the Force, and this relation- ship stood us in good stead when we went to the opening of the Imperial Institute by the Queen in May 1893. My brother-in-law had lent us his victoria, and after White- chapel bareness, it was pleasant driving through the Park ia its spring dress, and seeing the crowds of expectant people eager to catch sight of their Queen. We were late, and found ourselves being turned back in spite of the fullest credentials. Suddenly Mr. Barnett was recognised by some friend among the pohce, and all was changed, for we 100 MEETINGS FOR MOTHERS were not only allowed to go on, but received many salutes and evidences of welcome. " Who are they ? " we heard people standing in the crov/d ask, but no one could reply. We were just two genuine East-enders " known to the pohce," but later my husband was amused at being told, " It took us some time to spot you, sir, in such a smart turn-out." This is a digression from parish machinery, a di'ear subject, were it not for the spirit of the man who founded temporary helpfulnesses on deathless principles. Through all the organisations ran the same thought. Each indi- vidual, being a child of God, must be honoured, and no action taken which allowed him to forget his high caUing, or tempted him to accept himself to be " like a beast with lower pleasures, like a beast with lower pains ! " In the days when the parson was expected to reward his parishioners for attending the church or parish organisa- tions, our Mothers' Jieeting was exceptional : 1874. — No money advantage is gained by the members ; they simply meet, save pence for clothing, enjoy a chat, and hear some reading ; the meeting is generally closed by a short talk on the deeper sides of life, either by mj^self or Mrs. Barnett. If a gift of clothing or money were added, I should despair of seeing the growth of friendship or any spiritual good ; the members would learn to thuik only of gain, and grudge if they were not satisfied. That the meetings created friendship, there is no doubt, for in front of me — December 1914 — He fourteen letters of old " mothers " who have written to wish me blessings for this sad Christmas time ; and yet it is forty years after the meeting was estabhshed, and twenty-one years after Mr. Barnett had ceased to be Vicar of St. Jude's. For the reacUng of the usual goody-goody books we sub- stituted talks on matters which were or ought to be of interest to these important women, and. in iSSl the Vicar reported action which was but an anticipation of the schools for mothers now subsidised by the Government. Mrs. Ernest Eart gave the mothers a series of lectiu'es on " Bodies and Babies." Some intelligent interest was aroused, and the lectures were evidently popular. The teacliing though is not yet reduced to practice. The belief in the danger of water and the need of physic is too dee2ily rooted. While the mothers were but few, I used to take the MISS HARRIET GARDINER 101 illustrated papers and explain public events, an early begin- ning of the now popular newspapef class. Slowly the numbers grew, and when we left the parish in 1893 there were three flourishing Mothers' Meetings, the register of the evening one showing 120 on the books and 90 in regular attendance. The advantage of Mothers' Meetings, I believe, consists not so much in the actual teaching which is given, nor in the habit of saving which is encouraged, as in the sense of fellowship which is fostered. Women especially need some whole, bigger than the famUy, of which thej' can think, and whose needs they serve. To be a member of a meeting may be very far from being a member of a Church, of a Kingdom, but such mem- bership may be a preparation for the highest of all memberships in the body of Christ. Very devoted Vi'ere the ladies ^vho gave themselves to this work, and happy are the memories which gather round the gracious personahties of Mrs. Thurston Holland, IVIis. Godwin — sister-in-law of George Macdonald — and Miss Murray Smith — sister of the great pubUsher — while the strenuous work of Miss Gardiner can never be forgotten. To F. O. B., October ISth, 1889.— On Monday after the usual seeing people all day long, Lyulph Stanley and Gell came to dinner and then there was a great meeting of mothers gathered to m.ake a presentation to liiiss Gardiner. One hundred and fifty of them had kept the secret since last June. My wife made a pretty speech and the whole lot cheered as if they had never in their lives been so glad. With some of the mothers I held conferences on matters of pubhc morals or family ethics. The remark of one of them was instructive, though not conclusive. We were discussing the wisdom of permitting the girls in their teens to mingle freely with the boys of the same age, and regret was expressed at the loss of maidenly reserve resultmg from the street " larking ''' g.nd horse-play. " What we've got to remember," said one mother, herself a woman of native refinement, " is that there are worse girls always waiting for the boys. I'll agree to my girl losing something I'd rather she keep, if other mothers will let their girls keep my boys straight. There wiU be some ' larking,' say what you may, but why bad girls is allowed at all beats me. The pohce are sharp enough over 102 INFANT WELFARE pickpockets, but these sort of girls steal what's worth raore than a boy's money." One of our fellow-workers has sent her remembrances : I remember a Conference Meeting of the mothers at the Vicarage. I was asked to go to read aloud, and I went promptly, for I did love being with them both. It was the time of the Whitechapel murders, and the discussion turned on the drunkenness among men — the Vicaress declaring her conviction that men were what women made them ; that every married woman could stop the drink, if she would have nothing further to do with a drunken husband. My word ! the indignation that ensued and we all talked, and then a little mother with a big family asked what about the example to the children if she refused to speak to her husband, when all the home-life had to be lived in one room ? Nobody could offer a satis- factory solution. And so I read a Uttle gem of Oscar's WUde's, I think it Vv'as "The House of Pomegranates," and notwithstanding there was no final conclusion to our little debate, we all enjoyed ourselves. From the Mothers' Meetmgs grew the Maternity Society, based on the demand for seK-respect without which virtue cannot grow. Maternity Societies are only too common in London ; most of them offer premiums, more or less large, on improvidence. We have tried to make an improvement by requiring a sub- scription of three shillings before the usual gifts are made. The nurse collected the three shillings in twelve weekly visits, which gave opportunity for talks on the duty of cleanhness, sobriety, and industry, because they were in- fluences on the unborn child, an anticipation of the health- visiting now undertaken by municipal authorities. In writing the St. Jude's Reports it had always to be remembered that some for whom the parish machinery existed might read them, so to avoid hurting them, mitch was omitted which would have been enhghtening to the West-end people who mainly supported the organisations. The reports of the night schools said : Some very wild girls have, at any rate, learned order, and many have been introduced to places where they are doing well. I look back on this as good work. It would be well if many of those who work in the East End would be content with getting one or two girls thoroughly settled in places rather than trying to influence many. The desire for large and visible spiritual results is the curse of much missionary effort. But no mention is made of the extraordinary scenes that some of us went through with those dear dirty girls. I NIGHT SCHOOLS FOR GIRLS 103 recaU one evening when the gas was suddenly turned off, the heads of teachers wrapped in tablecloths, and the whole class, with mid whoops, tore down the stairs into the street. Fights between the girls were frequent, and enjoj^ed by both combatants and on-lookers. The Ip.nguage they used is best forgotten ; their unconquerable and communicable dirt led the way to the Verminous Persons Bill ; their way of looldng at things was a continual surprise ; their de- ficiency in seK-control made teaching almost hopeless ; but their hearts were good, fuU of tenderness, quick to respond to what was kind, and they were ready — until they forgot — to be responsible for any and every thing they were trusted ^\ith. What friendships grew out of that rough stony soil, and how we laughed at and mth them ! One of their deUghts was to see me mimic their maimers, and years after the trivial incidents were forgotten, it was not infrequent during a pleasant afternoon in the country for married women to call on me to show how " Lizzie " or " PoUy " had " carried on," " in the night school, you know, mum, top of the old schools." It was the knovi'ledge of the pure gold in those untaught wayward natures that provided the impetus for Mr. Barnett's incessant demand for better education, or to quote his words : Looking on, I see, in imagination, some, of whom we now almost despair, joyful in the pursuit of goodness, growing dailj- in purity and gentleness, daily discovering the life of man to consist in love and self-devotion ... as those taught of God, each seeking good and doing good according to his gift. CHAPTER X '" The true love of our neighbour depends on the love of God. Moses dis- covered Ood first, then helped his brethren. Isaiah met Him in the Temple, then told his neighbours to ' be just and relieve the oppressed.'' " The hard and exhausting work, amid neighbours of whose Hves it was often a pain and a shame to know, was Hghtened by the co-operation in service of many noble men and women who gave generously of their best to the people, and of their heart's affection to us. As our plans evolved, the Rev. H. R. Haweis made it his duty to tell his congre- gation that they could offer their work to Mr. Barnett, who would find something for everyone to do, and it was through his intervention that many willing helpers found their way to St. Jude's. The exact occasion of the advent of most of them I forget, but the coming of two ladies, Mss Marion Paterson and Miss Pauhne Douglas Townsend, still holds a place in my memory. It was after the evening service, when one was longing for supper and peace, that I got a message to say a new worker. Miss Paterson, was in the vestry with my husband who wanted me to see her. " Oh, bother ! " was, I fear, my thought, but I went back, up the north aisle to the vestry — then enclosed only by curtains — and standing between them was a girl of nineteen, whose childish face and violet eyes spoke of innocency. " How foolish of Mr. Haweis to send such a baby as this to Whitechapel," was my thought; " I can't let those eyes see evil'' ; and then, "Well, she can anyhow keep the clothes-cupboard tidy," was my practical decision, as I arranged with her to come down on a week-day and begin. Begin what 1 A hfe of ser\'ice that has lasted from 1876 even to this day ; a contribution to moral forces that has uplifted ideals ; an offering of sympathy to the hidden depths of all and sundry ; a self-surrender that was so complete in its unconsciousness as often to be unrecognised ; 104 Miss douglas townsend M and a gift of devotion to us both that " passeth under- standing." ^ Miss ToAvnsend came to us a year later. Of the work that she joined me to do my husband wrote : 1874. — The girls who Hve in these courts are of the roughest description ; 'wdth no home - training and only the very in- adequate education of a Ragged School, they have hved and learned in the streets. Their parents are for the most part beggars, or something worse, and unless they be removed from these terrible surroundings, there would seem to be little chance of saving them from ruin. And then four years later occurred the passage : 1878. — The work of seeking and placing out in service the little girls has this year increased to such an extent as to be beyond the power of Mrs. Barnett and her friends in this neigh- bourhood. . . We have therefore been happy in securing the services of Miss Douglas Townsend as Secretary, and Math her aid a branch of the Metropolitan Association for Befriending , Yoimg Servants has been opened. . . A well-selected place, the sense of friendship, the consciousness of care, make all the difference to the little servant in the strange house among new surroundings ; a difference which in the end will make her either a " curse " or a " blessing " to all generations. It is not often one engages a responsible worker and lays the foundation of a hfe's friendship in haK an hour, and yet that was all the time it took for Miss Townsend and me to arrange to unite our forces. With his almost unerring penetration Mr. Barnett had felt sure that she, the highly cultivated lady and accomphshed musician, was the woman needed to give affectionate and efficient help to the many young lives ever " knocking at the door," and so it proved. 1 To a girl-friend Misa Paterson wrote : June 2nd, 1876. — It was so nice at Mr. Haweis's tiiis morning. He brought in a clergyman from the East End who talked to us about all the poor sinners in the wretched courts and alleys of his parish, for he says they are more sinners than sufferers and want our friendship more than our money. I want to go and be their friend : I know they are drunkards and a worse class of people than I have ever seen, but I would try so hard to help them if only Papa and Mamma will let me. Mr. Barnett does not want us to be district visitors or preach to them or anything like that, but be really a friend to them, and so perhaps lead them to God without their knowing. The lessons he wants us to teach them are, " Love one another " and " Obedience to God." I feel I must go to them. I know it will be hard work and most likely seem a failure and their lives will seem so dreadful to mix with, still I feel I can and ought to do it. 1—9 106 MISS KATE POTTER For twenty-two years she spent four days of every week in Whitechapel, and when events had hindered so much active service she still watched, guided, and inspired her successors with the unique power she possesses. In 1875 Miss Kate Potter was sent to us by Miss Octavia, who wrote of her : She is very bright and happy, extremely capable, and has been through a good deal in her life though she is young. Of her work as rent-collector Mr. Barnett reported : 1878. — I have often had occasion to mention the common lodgings and nightly lodging-houses which abomid in this parish. They are filled with people of the lowest description, who, herd- ing together, are beyond the reach of any influence, and treat the words cast to them by the street preachers as the swine would treat the pearls. Fourteen of these houses have this year come into the possession of a friend of iiiss Octavia HiU's. It was dehghtful to enter the places of which one has such sad memories, to order the removal of dirt, the renovation of the broken doors and plaster, the admission of hght through new windows. It is more delightful to know that in these houses respectable people are now living, visited weekly by a lady who is not only the rent-collector, but a friend to help by wise coiuisel before the time of need, and with sympathy for them as creatures capable of the fullest life. For eight years Miss Potter worked with us, bringing in her wake her hosts of friends, as well as two sisters — Miss Theresa,' so beautiful in her stately body, and still more beautiful in her inquiring soul, daring in her quest for Truth to assault Heaven and face HeU ; Miss Beatrice,^ so strong in mind, graceful in hmb, and noble in feature, yet fearlessly, in her search for facts, working in sweating-shops and living as a lone girl in block dweUings. Miss Potter's friends were not of the "goody" sort, but were people holding the world's plums, of wealth, high social position, and posts of national responsibihty, but she brought them aU to tender their meed of service to the poor, and compelled them to face conditions usually hidden from the comfortable. In 1882 Mr. Leonard Courtney, M.P., won her for his wife, and of her departure Mr. Barnett wrote : 1 Later Mrs. Alfred Cripps, and now, alas ! no longer in this world. 2 Later Mrs. Sidney Webb, and still thinking and working to promote national well-being. MR. A, G. CROWDER 107 1883. — This year we lose Miss Potter. She has been a rent- collector since 1876, and has found here so many friends that, desiring on her wedding day to bo among lier " oa\ii people," she could only be among her friends at St. Judo's. March 1.5th, 1883, win be long remembered by tlie many who, on that day, followed their friend with kindly thoughts into her new life, and shared the first meal which she took with her husband. We shall not forget her, and she, I know, will not forget us. No ! indeed, that wedding is not forgotten — the dignified happiness of the bridegroom, the beauty of the bride's gown, the palms and the flowers in the Church, the Vicar's address, the height of the Buszard's cake, how Mr. Herbert Spencer behaved during the service, why Mr. John Morley looked so grave, the ladies' dresses, the number of carriages, the daintj' breakfast served in the big schoolroom, all so carefully arranged, that without fuss or patronage the coster sat side by side with the Member of ParUament, and the overworked mother enjoyed food she had not cooked, while she talked and listened to the " quahty " who had handed her to her seat. Was it bizarre, forced and fanciful ? No ! for all the guests, however far apart in mental and social degree, were united by their love and respect for the bride, whose thoughts and acts for everyone spelt friendship in imperish- able letters. " The Canon's ladies " was a family joke, for he had more women friends than any man I know. His mantel- shelf was dedicated to their photographs, and among them for nearly forty years stood those of Marion Paterson, Pauline Townsend, and Kate Courtney — a trinity of faithful friends. It seems almost ungracious to tell only of three of the many friends who joined us to serve the poor and who made the background of my husband's Mfe and work, and it is very tempting to write of the early associations with those for whom I care so much, but space is limited. Perhaps it \vill be permitted to mention Mr. A. G. Crowder, who, while hving in Portland Place, gave to East London most of his time and thoughts. I do not recall who intro- duced him, but I find his name recorded as a Sunday-school teacher in 1874, as a trustee of the playground in 1878, as a Guardian in 1 87 6, and it was his wealth which enabled the first block of model dwellings — now BaUiol House — to be built on land from which a group of " festering courts " was cleared. How my husband loved that man ! Tall, erect, weU-dressed, 108 REV. S. A. THOMPSON YATES cultivated, devout, his every action based on principle, Mr. Crowder was to him a rock on which to rest, while of my husband his friend wrote : I owe him a never-to-be-forgotten debt for all he taught me when I first turned my steps to East London. In 1877 our circle was enriched by the advent of the Rev. S. A. Thompson Yates. He was then about thirty- two, and, having left an easy parish, felt it his duty to do hard work. This we were able to offe^ him. He took a bouse in Commercial Road and brought his footman, his maid, his china, his Chippendale furniture, his pictures, and his cellar, to share with us all. " I refuse to be too busy in improving other people's Hves to Hve my own properly," he would say when demands on his time were too encroaching, and thus at Mr. Yates's house one always had the refreshment of the newest books, the freshest theories, and the last pohtical and hterary gossip. His work, done in regulated hours, was admirable. Strong, kind, clear-sighted, and generous, he carried heaUng in his hands, and when after twelve years' residence in East London he moved westwards, he left a great gap in the hves of many dull clergymen, duller curates, and over- worked municipal and C.O.S. officials. One by one they gathered round us, those kindred spirits, and to introduce them to each other and to those among our neighbours who were fellow- worshippers, invitation meetings were held, at which ethical problems were dis- cussed and ideals unashamedly set forth. It was the response that noble thoughts aroused in un- expected quarters that made my husband start the Com- municants' Society, a small effort on which he set a large value. 1878. — As a means of developing the soul's life, which is to the mind what the mind is to the body, we have instituted a Society of Communicants. . . Its object is to enable its members to rise nearer to God, within sight of those high and holy visions which haunt our lives. Talking about the Holy Communion will enable us to break down some of the superstitions which have hitherto sur- rounded it, and prevented people from using a means, which, by its simplicity, its social character, and its universality of love, seem fitting an age which thinks that " he prayeth best who loveth best." . . . Life is more depressing than it need be because the people THE COMMUNICANTS' SOCIETY 109 we meet interest us so little. All seem so much alike, moved by the same selfish fears and by the same narrow hopes. It is as we becam.e conscious that we have deeper feeling and wider hopes, have not onlj? bodies and minds but also spirits, that interest grows and communion deepens. The meetings were always held in the Vicarage, for it was not possible to obtain the necessary quiet in the crowded schools, but the ordeal of facing the parlour-maid, so trying to some simple folk, was avoided, for every last comer opened the door for the next arrival, and when the big dramng-room was built in 1884 it was planned so aa to admit the parish friends without the ceremony of ringing. 1881. — The Communicants' Meetings tend more to rest than to activity ; the quiet of the Vicarage dra"wing-room, the sober talk, the solemn thoughts, make those present feel as if it were enough " to be," and as most people are anxious " to do," the numbers present every month are not large. . . "\A'e have learned to know one another as those v/ho are not ashamed of having souls, and we have learned to recognise more of the real power of the Holy Communion. The superstition which at present keeps some away, and draws others, robs life of the possibility of a unity after which men dimly strive. . . As each sacred season set apart by the Church came round, Mr. Barnett specially prepared subjects for medita- tion and prayer. These were written out and given to each member of the society. One is here appended ; HOLY WEEK, 1888 The Holy Communion is sometimes not real because our Lord is not to us a real Person. We are unable to feel His presence as we feel the presence of a dear absent friend, whose thoughts, whose opinions, whose life we know. I would therefore suggest that during Holy Week you should dwell on some special features in our Lord's character. Monday. His patience. He endured opposition — Luke ix. 55, 56. He bore His sorrow alone — Mark xiv. 37. " When He was reviled. He reviled not again ; when He suffered, He threatened not." Tuesday. His courage. He faced a host — Mark xiv. 42-8. He despised cowardice — Mark viii. 38. He dared to touch the leper.-^Luke v. 13. " Be strong, and of good courage." no SUBJECTS FOR MEDITATION Wednesday. Hie generosity. Party spirit could not make Him unfair — Mark ix. 39. He saw good in the Roman Conqueror — Luke vii. 10. " Tlie liberal man deviseth liberal things." Thursday. His indignation. He felt in Himself the wounds man gave to God — Mark vii. 8. He resented wrong as wrong and not as injury to Himself — Mark viii. 33. " Be ye angry and sin not." Friday. His seK-sacrifioe. He loved to serve — Mark x. 45. His enemies saw His purpose to be others' good — Mark xv. 31. " I am among you as one that serveth." Saturday. His hopefulness. He saw life beyond death — Mark x. 34. Rest beyond work — JIatt. xi. 29. Glory beyond shame — Mark xiv. 62. " Abound in hope." Samuel A. Baenett. Mr. Barnett's constant effort was to show how, to the man in the street of to-day, rehgion was a vital matter. He had httle sympathy with those who felt that the Church needed no new clothes, but he had too strong an historic sense not to wish to use the ancient forms, and to read into them the modern spirit. The foUowing passage illus- trates what is meant : 1887. — In the studj^ of the Communion SerAace we have been anew struck bj' its fitness to modern needs. The soul of the worshipper, after being presented to the terrible God whose will is made known in law and Gospel, rises to declare its belief in this God. Then entering, as it were, into that great Society which in all times and places has fought for right, the soul con- fesses its shortcomings, hears that the God of power is also a God of love, and catches an echo of the song " which angels sing." In the strength of this knowledge the soul can humbly ask even a crumb from God's table, and it hears once more of the gift of Christ which proclaims God's infinite Love. All creation seems now to exist for the individual ; it seems as if for the one eating and drinking, God's will had been proclaimed and God's gift made ; for the moment, the man is alone, and his perfection is the absorbing project of Omnipotence. But if it be a great matter to be an individual, it is a greater matter to be part of a whole, so at once in common praj'er the soul which has been face to face with God is called to remember its place in the Christian body and its work as a member of that body. The service ends with the hymn of praise fitting to those who by humility have conquered sin, and who being alone have found their place in God's company. . . THOUGHTS ON HOLY COMMUlSnON 111 In 1885 Mr. Barnett wrote : 1885. — The Commimicants' Society has not developed accord- ing to onr hopes. Its work may be deeper than is seen, and some may by its means be living a closer life with God, but evi- dence of such life would be welcome. As one gets older, one learns that there is no other satisfaction for human nature than communion with the Divine nature. One turns, therefore, from evidence of greater comfort and greater knowledge to see if one's neighbours live with a greater sense of an indwelling God. The search is vara, and the Communicants' Society seems to exist to no purpose. Very deep was my husband's disappointment over the failure of his efforts to make the people care for the Holy Communion. To some few, the preparation meetings repre- sented the high-water mark of spiritual experience, but for the majority of those who came only occasionally the teach- ing was too elusive, too impersonal, too ethereal, to grip their thought. One who was present on these evenings told me that many years afterwards in speaking to a brother- clergyman of what he owed to St. Jude's and to Mr. Barnett, his friend broke in vd.th : " Yes, and his addresses to the communicants ! Can you ever forget them ? They were the highest and most spiritual I ever heard. They really seemed ' to lift up our hearts unto the Lord.' " , For fourteen years, once a month, Mr. Barnett gathered the little group together and spoke to them of humanity's deepest needs and highest hopes, and because, in the great- ness of his ideals for all men, he used fathom-Knes where yard-measures would suffice, or pointed out the stars to those who only wished to see fire-balloons, at least he fol- lowed His Master's example Who gave the law-ridden world the spiritual precepts of the Sermon on the Mount. I quite understood those who said " they were not good enough " to assume even by their presence that they could reach so lofty a standard of aspiration, but I also felt that there were many among our fellow- workers who would be greatly helped if they could be made aware of the spiritual basis of the Vicar's work. I therefore persuaded him to allow them to join the Communicants' Society annual meeting on Advent Sunday. At first the West-end friends were invited by personal letters, but, as the number grew, the invitations had to be printed. One is printed here ; ®oniiK£r:iaI i5lTS£t, ^U. ahtffLScJj2 js^ /^' ikc^Jtu^e, <3i /u.aa.cQ' i -fat. yoikmi . hou. (k (>m.tL^ L ducL at L ijoooLCt^A^ dee. cUIJ-cjumJ-^l U^e^TScd. , itiLcJ}-^ J- u ffz&C ^ iA^U wJjL Jou- dazitc Cm^£ aii. JacLdLisu, Tlou. 2.7 . Io<lic is wishing us out of Egypt. Courtney sees great danger m this conference, which will leave us bound. He has his prinoiiDle, — and a principle, be it right or wrong, simplifies thought, — " Let all stew in their own juice." July \-lh, 1884. — I contemn this agitation against the Lords. Let Government bring in a proposition to reform the Lords, but it is despicable to attempt to govern by threats. It was a good rule of the Kavy to admit no excuse. If a captain lost a ship, he lost his place. The Government has not governed ; it has lost control of the House, let it go. August 1884. — I have been reading Maurice's letters. It is gentle, soothing reading, suggesting peace and patience while it shows the fire beneath. He felt the need of men knowmg men and of the intermingling of rich and poor. November \st, 1884. — Politics seem in a sad condition. Some- times one feels that all efforts are built on a hollow while statesmen behave as they do. Party spirit is overwhelming all principles and all clear thinking. It seems impossible that our people should learn to think except in exile and captivity. If only men would study Jewish History, what a guide they might have to politics. Stadeu Faem, nb. Buxton, Juhj 1884. My deae Feank, We started on Tuesday with our pony and trap, getting to Derby in the evening. There at the station we harnessed and loaded and drove off through the rain. At 8 we reached a little village and begged in vain for shelter at the inns. At last a widow grocer took us in, and, having made up the fire, we got tea in her kitchen. The next day the rain continued and we stuck to our widow grocer. Thursday we, by forced marches through the showers, reached Bakewell. We passed Matlock when we had two hours of sunshine, a to'^vn crowded into a narrow gorge. In idea it is a striking place and people would talk if a town were settled in Cheddar cliffs. In fact, such a town is close and oppressive ; the advantage is found in the continual impulse to go up. Bakewell we liked as a centre. On Friday with fairer weather we left for H! addon Hall, a country house of the time when Englishmen had learnt to live in quiet luxury and had not learnt vulgarity. The rooms are 172 LETTERS, 1884 beautiful with oak panels, and large generous windows. The grounds are quaint and quiet. We were charmed and pictured the place restored to use as a kind of retreat, a convalescent home for tired minds. A man like Maurice could have presided over such a place. Chatsworth, to which we went afterwards, is alto- gether different. Wealth had ransacked the world to make great rooms, buy Italian art, frame the biggest conservatories, and plan rocks into wild forms. The eff'ect was after all very small, and I can't imagine Chatsworth filling any place in the time to be. It is not a house to represent a home, and its things had better be in a Museum nearer town. Then we drove on here by one of the most beautiful drives I have ever been, over hill and through dale, taking in the essence of English beauty. Here we were welcomed by the dear Horsf alls and here we shall stay. With love for ever, S. A. B. Whitechapel, August 1884. To F. G. B. In the evening of Thursdaj^ we left for York and got the last room in the hotel and enjoyed the Minster service. What a house that Minster is for worship. I think we want different forms of building for different moods of feeling. It is not true to say that Gothic is more religious than classical. In some moods St. Paul's finds me as \¥estminster cannot. All parts, as Rabbi Ben Ezra says, are good. The best is in their union. . . Our last days at Whitby went as the others. The sea was as fresh as on the first. Sailors will take their place among the highest. They alone confess the substance in which they work to be above themselves, and so they alone learn reverence as they work. Perhaps, as in the old days the sun was the commonest type or image of God, in these days the sea might be. Francis Henry might work out this thought and preach the revelation of the sea, the Gospel according to the waves. Whitechapel, Ajml 1885. To F. G. B. What about Afghanistan ? The Government has, I suppose, been shilly-shallying as usual. Tilings so big must have had a beginning. Seeley told me Rosebery is for fighting Russia, so I suppose we shall soon be in for bad times. What a loss ! The hands of progress will be put back, there will be no reform of the sort we want, while thoughts of men are hardened by tales of war. The real reason is political inactivity. The mass of LETTERS, 1885 173 men love their own work better than the nation's, so its concerns are left to rogues or fools. The creed to be preached is " I believe in principle which underlies all action, and I believe in equality which consolidates all relationship." After all this is only a modern dress for the two commandments which are greatest of all. Wi-iiTMOHArai., J/.:-7 Olh, 1S85. To F. G. B. The Soudan business is disgraceful, and in satisfaction at the escape from Russia, its wickedness is being forgotten. I should like to stir up public opinion, and wanted a meeting for Courtney or someone of that sort. The worst sign of the time is the exhaustion of feeling. These sentiments of pity and rage have been so often worked that now men are not moved by even shocking tales of massacre and sickness. The need is good honest thought, and reason. Feeling may be the steam, but it must be shut in the boiler of reason. St. Jude's Vicarage, August dth, 1SS5. My deab Fkank, The event of the week was a visit to Whitechapel of the Artisans Dwelling Committee. They called for me and J guided them round and filled their minds with sound doctrine. Cross dubbed me his "chaplain" and refused to go a step without me. I hope some good may come. The Committee is evidently in earnest and some of them are nice. I dislUied A and he disliked me. He was anxious to shut me up, but I am to go before the Committee. As they go on to coimtry work, I will see that Hollond has your letter. We had a pleasant party at the Rathbones' last night and met there many M.Ps. with whom I again discussed dwellings. In the afternoon I had been to a drafldng-room meeting re young servants. Dull things are drawing-room meetings, and I could not get a response though I did made a special effort. To-day there has been a good meeting at the Mansion House. Thursday I was interviewed by a man who wants to start gymnasiums for boys on a paying basis. How men worship this paying basis ; they think it an infallible test. Because we don't want the foolish gifts, they think there is no room for wise ones. By the bye, a man has just offered mo £100 to send out women to the country after their confinements. A good thing, isn't it 1 On Thursday too, I did something about Boys' Clubs for East London. That I should like to set up before I leave the East. 174 LETTERS, 1885 There are one or hvo things still left to conquer in this world ! ! In the evening we had a party at Bond's by the light of C hinese lanterns. It was pleasant. Wednesday was a people's party, so was Monday. Dearest love, S. A. B. Keblb Cottaqb, Lyme Regis, Aujust 1385. My dbab Miss Townsend, We are very sorry that you cannot come and share our pleasure. Ours now is very real pleasure, the country is our preacher and our poet, the sea does our work, and we ourselves, like iiealthy children, play and laugh careless. There is no such good place as a lovely slope by the sea for a holiday. Somehow the loveliness saves one the burden of thinlving to find out what is good. Through the silence, the beauty, and the grace, the knowledge of good comes while we are passive. Somehow, too, the sea by its ceaseless, untiring toil saves us from the burden of idleness and we work by substitution. The strange doctrine expressed by this last word gets a meaning and I get a glimmering of the satisfaction of those who say Christ suffered instead of them and that they are saved by substitution. This though is a bit of a sermon, and not the letter of people who, blooming with health, pass the day laughing and chatting, who eat their dinner on the gi-ass and forage for tea in farm houses, who forget there is anyone in the world who would scorn their freedom and jo3^ Yes, I wish you were here to see us and join in our gladness. Every morning sees us start at 11.30 with our baskets and a book, and we do not return until 7.30. The day seems to fly, and at its end we have only one memory which it is impossible to analyse. Yesterday we drove to Ford Abbey, finding our way there over the hills and returning by the vales ; the hills are high and stern, the valleys gentle and clothed in peace. The Abbey is one of the old houses rescued by modern trade and made to serve the pur- jDoses of a dwellmg- house. We went over the place and some glorious tapestries of the Raphael cartoons. Perhaps these things, so well known, pleased us most of all we saw in the house. To-day is Sunday and the hush has come over tlfings which is so fit for the day. I don't know what we shall do. Chui-ch with its crowd is not in harmony ; we shall probably go to the lander- cliff and get our quiet time there. Would that we could shed some ofjthe good and quiet over you. I don't dare say you are having it because we have it, yet in my heart I hope you may find even that doctrine to be true. '■ With^love, S. A. B. LETTERS, 1885 175 September 1885. Deab Miss Townsend, My wife is still in bed in the prostrate stage which follows her attacks. To me it has not been hard to do the nursing, I have rather enjoyed the power of doing so with a quiet mind. The hard part has been the duty of walking and taking my pleasure with the thought that she is missing her holiday. I am very well and enjoy the cool breeze, but she would do better in warmer weather. Our next move is not clear. We may leave this on Friday and then go on to the New Forest or to Clifton. I shrink some- what from a driving tour with its chances of wet, and damp beds. How good of you to work at our Prayer Book idea. I have read your work with delight. I think now we can bring your and my efforts together and make a good whole. I quite agree with you about altering the rubric. In fact, I had come to the conclusion that it was not possible to do so. Your plan of explaining it is much better. I will now see if I can get it published. We have a great deal to talk about, and often wish for your clear head and loving heart to help us see plainly. To-day we were saying to each other how you have always stood by us. I do wish you were having a holiday too. With love, S. A. B. Dartmook, September 8th, 1885. Dbah Miss Townsbnd, We are enjojong our little jaunt and I am glad we started. It was an effort to shake clear of the comforts of Lyme Regis and risk the dangers of cold, discomfort, and strange places. It is good, though, I beheve, on hohdays to make such efforts, and so I am coming to think that travelling is necessary to a re- creating holiday. One must make efforts under all the pleasant conditions of air and scenery and with fresh stimuli, to enable one to make efforts in Whitechapel. . . We like Dartmoor for its grandeur. The hills sweep in bold curves and are worthy of their granite ribs, the dales between are full of moss, ferns, and trees. As one travels, one passes at once from stermiess to gentleness. Here, as in the greatest, force and love are one. Our great pleasure, though, has been in watching the clouds. Never did I see them as I saw them yesterday. Eng- land is the home of clouds, and we yesterday had sunshine, thunder, and Scotch mist. On a lonely point it was possible to watch the play of giants, to look around a storm, to see the comparative smallness of the thunder shower under which some city perhaps was quailing. A stay here makes a good interlude in a holiday. 176 LETTERS, 1885 Yes ! I hope the wife will do the National Gallery penny catalogue some day. It is a big work but it waits to he done, and the doing may be one of those things which tend to the growth of good. You see it is only by growth that any real good can come, so it is better to do what promotes growth rather than aims at the good. And as to promoting growth, we have I suppose to do more with the soil than with the seed, and a good catalogue might prepare the soil of many hearts to receive good which we cannot sow. However, I am chatting on and ought to be packing. With love, S. A. B. Hastings, December 8th, 1885. My dbae Feank, We are just off to go home with a burden of pleasant memories and a glow of health. It has been a good time and we have enjoyed the bright sunshine, the rest, the talks, and some work. I have done four newspaper articles on Chiirch Reform. You will see one in the P.llI.G. I hope it may stir you to action. . . Like other parties we have too many policies, and have not learnt submission. Sometimes I wonder if any- thing less than fire can pm-ge the world. I suppose, though, if some of us don't try, the fire will burn everything and there will be nothing to purge. . . My wife has also done her share of work. She has put one article in order, \\Titten another, kept up the correspondence, organised parties, and planned good for a host of folk whom she carries in her heart. The power of thinking of people according to their characters, of bearing not only their demands but their being is rare and precious. . . On the whole the election will chasten both parties and both need it. They who win, lose. The people to be pitied are the Irish who, in the hour of victory, mil lose the qualities which made them win. The " rich hardly enter." The successful hardly win. Happy are the poor and beaten. Wo have greatly enjoyed Edna Lyall's We Two, a novel without a villain and in which love is strong by being silent. The authoress has the art of making silence speak and she saj^s more than she tells. In a strange way she makes the reader feel the force of Christianity. . . I have been reading Morlcy's Rousseau, and am not pleased. One cannot see the man for the analysis, and one longs that Blorley may be less eloquent. . . Love of the deepest to you all. S. A. B. CHAPTER XV " Children should he taught to enjoy leisure . , . which should not he a vacation, an empty time.'^ Towards the end of the winter of 1876-7 Mr. Barnett again became ill, and as the doctors said he required prolonged rest, we did not plan as usual to travel, but arranged to go to Cornwall, where he took Church duty for Canon Shuttle- worth at Wadebridge. We hved in the dehghtful, if some- what tumble-do^vn Vicarage of Egloshayle, and had a wonderful holiday. Every morning after an early breakfast we had three hours' steady reading — it was Jowett's Plato that year — and then, having loaded the tiny two-wheeled chaise with provision basket, oats-bag, sketching things, and bathing gowns, we trotted off to spend the day out-of-doors, returning to the evening meal with old Nurse and httle Faimy. Because we went slowly we were able to go far, and as the weeks went on, we learnt with more than a casual acquaintance the beauties of that fierce smiling rugged coast from St. Mawgan to Boscastle. My husband specially loved the sea, but sometimes we cbove inland and rejoiced in the great woods round Bodmin, the wild sweet- scented moors, or the tantalising idiosyncrasies of " Brown WiUy." Miss Octavia, then both ill and unhappy, came to stay with us, and in spite of our reverence for her we made her sit " bodldn " in the little chaise, and compelled her to join in our most frivolous pleasures. Later my sister and Mr. Hart came, bringing their horses and larger carriage to add to the carrying-power of the Vicarage, and then more and more guests, rich and poor, gentle and simple, until fl'e were both weary. But out of that weariness grew a movement which has not stopped growing yet. It shall be told by a writer in The Child, who, after speaking of my husband's sympathetic understanding of the child nature, referred to tiae Children's Country Holiday Fund, and wrote : 177 178 GENESIS OF THE C.C.H.F. In Mrs. Barnett's words the genesis of the movement can be given. " Honestly," she said, " we had both got tired of the Buccession of our guests ; they were all dear and delightful people working so hard in drear Whitechapel, the children pining for all that brighter air meant, and the joys of the sand and rocks, but it was our lioliday too, and the uncontrolled laughter, and lawlessness of habits and customs, so innocent for them, but so trying for us, had become unduly jarring to our tired nerves. ' But there is stiU so and so and so to mvite,' we reminded each other, ' and they do so need a change.' Just then we were walking up a hill, the road winding between an undulating down on the right-hand side, and fields stretching to the sandy bay and laughing sea on the left-hand side. A little way back off the road stood a cottage, its tiny garden and open windows speaking both of air and care — a comely woman standing by the door. Like a flash from Heaven came the idea to me : " ' Why should they not go there instead of to us ? They would Hke it better, relieved from the restrictions of continual best maimers, and we should get the quiet we need. We could meet them on the sands every day and give them a " good time " and a tea picnic' " ' What a good idea,' said the Vicar ; ' but they need not come quite so far. The home counties would be cheaper for fares, and then we could afford to send more of them.' " ' But what about the people to give them a "good time" ? They find the country so duU, if they are not shown its beauties,' I said. " ' That will be all right,' my husband replied. ' The right people will arise, when the need is shown. I wiU write to The Guardian and ask the country clergy to take it up and suggest cottagers.' " The summer was nearly over when that useful idea was vouchsafed to us, but so effective were the rephes to the letter in The Ouardian that nine ailing children were sent that year to the homes of country cottagers for a fortnight's hohday, and thirty-three the foUomng summer — 1878. — Thereby obtaining not only health, but that interest in country life which is so wanted to form real national feeling. . . . For children who, not recovering from any severe illness, but only want change of air, the varied life of a cottage home, the freedom from the restraint of rules, the possibility of form- ing country friendships, are much greater advantages than the presence of a doctor or nurse. And if we seek for a deeper intent, it can be taken from one of Mr. Barnett's addresses to those who were sending the children away : The ideal which I would place before all j'ou workers is the salvation of the children, the elevation not just of their capacity to be happy and strong, but the development of the power to know God and love their neighbours. During the summer of 1879, 173 children were sent away. The next year — 1880 — Mr. Atkinson, Mr. Barnett's colleague RAPID GROWTH OP THE PLAN 179 to whom the work had been referred, reported that 433 chikken had had a radiantly good time. On his leaving us in 1881 to become Vicar of St. Mary's, Huntingdon, the inevitable Committee was formed and called " The Children's Hohday Committee (East London)." Later — 1884 — it en- larged its borders and changed its name to " The Children's Country HoUday Fund," and since then has done the work, collected the money, issued literature, and not only sent 956,253 London children to gain health and gladness among fields and flowers and on sea-shores, but has been the pioneer of similar societies in England, on the Continent, and in America. As the work of the Society grew, its problems grew too, and organisations had to be created to avoid difficulties. A constitution was evolved, and District Committees, Sub- committees, Finance Committees, Advisory Committees created ; regulations drafted ; forms A, B, C, D, and up to R, instituted ; country correspondents discovered ; hsts of approved village centres made ; a scale of parents' contribu- tions set up ; principles for the selection of children laid donm ; machinery for their cleanhness estabhshed ; rules for country hostesses engaged ; and undue naughtiness, illness, or accident provided for. All this machinery had to be kept oiled and ruiming, as well as the money collected and fresh workers enhsted, who had to be brought into touch -with each other and pro^/ided with the necessary Hterature. To the C.C.H.F. Mr. Barnett brought as secretaries men who were usually hving with us in Toynbee Hall, and v/ho have since made their mark. Thus Sir Cyril Jackson, Mr. Charles F. G. Masterman, Mr. R. H. Tawney, Mr. G. E. C41adstone, Professor E. J. Urwick, Mr. W. R. L. Blakiston, all began their official lives in the service of the children ; while the names of Mi-. Reginald Bray, Mr. Austen Chamber- lain, Mr. Clement Scott, Miss M. Sewell, who wrote for the Society, will show what able minds served their cause. Mr. " Punch " has ever been the friend of children, and charming have been Mr. F. Anstey's whimsical sketches of small people pining for a large sky. Miss Ruth Verney's article is too good not to be quoted, for it shows vividly the spirit of the ladies who gathered the town children round thek country homes, and taught them to enjoy simpler and higher pleasures than had been their' wont. 180 MISS RUTH VERNE Y On a certain Thursday towards the end of July the London platforms swarm with excited cliildren starting for a country holiday. At the other end of the journey certain of the rural folk, and especially the farmers, are shivering at the prospect of invasion by a horde of fence-breaking, apjile- eating barbarians. Now, the sucoessof the fortnight depends, to some extent, on the children, but it depends much more upon the country correspondent. It is lamentable that here and there villages are closed to the children because one year they were insufficiently shepherded and got into mischief. We have boys and girls between the ages of seven and thirteen every year down in Buckinghamshire ; they say they enjoy themselves, and they seem very happy, but their pleasure is as nothmg compared with ours. To begin with the boys, my sister makes herself responsible for about thirty. She goes from cottage to cottage in three tiny villages, finding room for one here, and two there, and (in a few cases) three somewhere else. On the eventful day the children arrive at our nearest station ; the compartments are locked, but the boys caimot wait the pleasure of phleg- matic country porters, and they empty themselves through the window. Then, after much burrowing under the seats for brown-paper parcels, and incessant happy shouting, we pack ourselves, a party of thirty-five, into a brake to hold eighteen. The village population gathers in the road to welcome us ; at each garden gate we drop the allotted boys, and a beaming cottage-mother takes them inside for a hearty tea. Early the next mornmg the park is alive with little boys, all clamouring for my sister and a cricket pitch ; those who are down for the first time occasionally forget their manners and show oS their cockney independence, but they are mstantly cuiYcd into submission by our friends " the old boys," who know and trust us. After that, the fortnight is one joyous turmoil. From nme m the morning (when several little heads peer round the open door to sec if they may joui in the hymn at prayers) till dusk, my sister is sur- rounded by boys, big and little, healthy and sickly, noisy and (rarely) quiet. About twice a week a formal cricket match is organised against a village team, and London always wins. After seven days the treasurer sends down a cheque, and every mother is paid 5s., 10«., or £1 accordmg to the number of boys she is housing. Sometimes a woman can cook and " do " for them, but has no spare bed, in which case Neighbour So-and-so arranges to " sleep " them. The weekly visits on pay-day take some time, as every mother is encouraged to talk about the boys and to report on their conduct. Jim and Tommy Holland will play with the pump, little Garrett took some plums, Scott fought a village urchin, and so on. A rebuke from my sister generally puts an end to unpleasantness of this kind, and most mothers have notliiiig but good to say of the boj's. They come everj' year from the same school, and they know that six years back two really bad boys were sent home during the first week, so there is a wholesome sub- stratum of fear below their great affection for my sister. Every encouragement is given to nature-study, and this year six boys found a large snake. They subscribed for spirits of wine and kept it in a large pickle-bottle for the school museum. Even the big boys make odd mistakes ; spying two baby colts in a field, they shouted greetings to them : " We remember you last year." Our hammock-stand puzzled them a good deal ; " I expect it's a sparrer-perch " v/as the final verdict. Boy Judd took a paternal interest in a WTCn's nest, and was disgusted when the wren abandoned it after his twelfth friendly visit. Little Dawson was extremely pretty, particularly in his best clothes. One Sunday he CHILDREN AND VILLAGERS 181 appeared in week-day garments. We said, " Why don't you wear j'our white suit ? " " Please, miss, it's green," said the child, who had found a grassy bank down which to roll. One morning a dead mole was found. " What did you do with it 1 " " Please, miss, wo put it in the lottcr-box." We looked shocked. " Please, miss, j'osterday we put four live frogs in." We tried to expostulate, " How cruel ! " " Oh ! please, miss, we put plenty of grass and stuff in, too, for 'em to eat." The girls are every whit as quaint as their brothers. The same pro- cedure is followed when they arrive, and special friends feci Providence has indeed been kind when a wish to be together, expressed months ago to governess, lands them in the same cottage " as each other." I appoint my girls to meet me every morning at a given time m front of the public Ubrarj', and the librarian is good enough to attend speciallj' three times a week that they may have a succession of story-books. Country lasses take a week, at least, to read anything, but the London child tears the heart out of a story in one day. We then adjourn to a garden that is lent us, and I give out notices of tea-parties, church services, etc., with ecclesiastical sonorousness. If possible, we play rowdy games for half an hour, during which the children are unconsciously revealing themselves to an observant and amused " shepherdess." Then they are all dismissed except two, with whom I indulge m a more intimate talk, hearing about their home-life and making friends with them ; there is also the opportunity of reproof, though this is seldom necessary. This year Annie and Hetty made a fuss at country hours, and wanted to stay up tiU eleven ; Janet and Mary gobbled down their food before the scandalised cottage-mother could " ask a blessing" ; and one poor little mite of seven used naughty words. It is, however, touching to find that in every case a few gentle words are enough to stop the evU. The tirst Sunday was our only wet daj', and Patt}' graphically described cottage doings durmg a severe thunderstorm. " We aU got together ; there was me and Mrs. Hodge and 'er 'usbing and 'er two ants and the three children, and four from next door, and we sang 'ims, ' 'Ushed was the hevenmg 'im,' ' Once a David's,' and lots more." We met a small girl one day with a large paper bag of gooseberries. " Have you been buying those at the shop ? " we asked. A little voice of immense scorn piped out, " There ain't no gooseberry shops do^vn 'ere," and we retired abashed. The same child was heard apostrophising a nettle. " Well, I are a silly ! First I pinches me finger in the scullery door, and then I catches 'old of you ! " Frances came down with two skirts — a white muslin, which she tore to shreds the first days, and a blue satin, in which she lived happily ever after. Amy brought one hat only — a common rush hat, value perhaps 2|rf. She is seven, but when the big thirteen-year-olds made disparaging remarks on it she said loftily, " Don't you know it's Arley straw ? " which reduced them to awed silence. I found afterwards that this name was invented on the spur of the moment. We have a catalpa tree, which was at its best, in fuU flower, when the children were here. Cockney imaginativeness soon re-christened it more conveniently the " cat '11 purr." We notice every year that the presence of the children calls out much kindness and hospitality. Not only do the cottage-mothers " wash and mend them " up to the last moment, but they go back laden with fruit, flowers, and vegetables which they have certainly not bought. Our richer neighbours invite the elder ones to tea, or give leave for a romp in a pretty garden, or help with a picnic. I once drove a deUcate little girl to a 182 APTITUDE FOR ORGANISING rendezvous, and asked if she had ever driven in a carriage before. She said " No. Yes, but I 'ave though, at me father's funeral." This year the summit of our pleasure was reached when an M.P. and his wife gave two guineas towards extra joys. The boys had a long chive in a brake, then buns and gmger beer in the woods. The ghis had shiUhig and ninexjenny books — old favourites of one's own childhood. A small person of eight said ecstatically, " Nobody 'as ever giv' mo a book in my life before." An older one said, " Father always gave me a book on my birthday, but since 'e's died I've never 'ad one." Lamb's Tales proved extremely popular and several of the girls asked breathlessly if the books were " really to keep," though every one had the child's name in it. There was quite a gloom in the place when the last day came ; the quiet station was full of children with flowers, bundles, rhubarb, potatoes, cabbages, and small, precious parcels of fresh eggs. One boy felt the occasion hardly justified such flowers and suggested how nicely they would come in for burying. A benevolent lady had hot buns in a basket, and so laden were the girls with packages of all shapes that the buns had per- force to travel as " inside passengers." We got them all off at last, after endless hand-shakings and many promises of writing constantly. I know that already there are a large number of country correspondents, but if more of us realised the great pleasure of the work I feel sure the C.C.H.F. would no longer have so many children on their hands waiting for country homes and kindly shepherds. The amount one sees of the boys and girls depends entirely on one's own inclinations, but to those who love children the responsiveness of these merry, grubby little creatures is most satisfying and wholly delightful. Letters pour in after their departure full of gratitude and fond messages — " Mother do think me wonderful brown " ; "I am so sorrowful without you " ; " Hoping we might be able to come next year again " ; " With the greatest of love, so good-bye for the present." My husband had a natural aptitude for organising, and greatly enjoyed using effectively the different qualities of the various sorts of people who were ready to serve. He was ingenious in suggestions and generally found employ- ment for the most able or the most eccentric of his followers. He had a clear and retentive memory, not only of people he had seen but of those of whom he had only been told. He was unfailingly optimistic, so much so that he was apt to postpone facing difficulties, being quite sure that a con- venient ram would be found in some handy thicket. He gave a high place to advertisement, and produced some original methods of popularising facts or stating needs, though, unlike some philanthropists, he was scrupulous in avoiding exaggeration or immodest exposure of private pain. He affirmed that a line quahty of imaginative sympathy was required for advertisement which should be used to awaken — not to satisfy — pubhc interest, to remind people of their privileges of helpfulness but not to plead EMINENT SUPPORTERS 183 with them to do their duties. His business acumen often surprised men who thought he was only a tame parson, and though he had had no commercial training, his active sympathy showed him what " the other fellow " would hke to have and what he would be prepared to give for it. Such quahties are valuable in any large undertaking, and not any the less so when the workers are partly permanent officials and party transient volunteers. At the head of the former stands Miss Finlay, who since 1885 has given not only unstinted time and thought to the care of thousands of children she has never seen, but has preserved by her lovely influence that tradition of devotion which is the ruhng spirit in the office of the C.C.H.F. Mr. Barnett's conviction that the strength of a society lay in the unity of its members resulted in many meetings, when difficult problems were freely handled, he as Chairman never allowing the practical points to smother the principles affecting character, be it of the children, the villagers, or the workers. Beautiful and historic houses were lent for the annual meetings, when distinguished people, holding aU sorts of opinions, sank their differences and muted to aid the children. Among the speakers or Chairmen were : The Prince of Wales The Princess Henry of Battenburg The Duchess of Albany Princess Mary Adelaide, Duchess of Princess Louise Teck The Rev. Dr. Adler Mr. George Lansbury Sir George Alexander Sir Oliver Lodge The Rt. Rev. Peter Amigo Miss Violet Markham Miss Lena AshweU Mr Gerald Du Maurier Mr. H. H. Asquith Sir Frederick MUner Lord Avebury (the late) Mrs. Pember Reeves Canon Bamett The Rt. Rev. the Bishop of Ripon Mrs. S. A. Bamett Mr. Herbert Samuel, M.P. Sir James Crichton Browne Lord Sandhurst Sir William BuU, M.P. Mrs. Scharheb, M.D. Lord Hugh Cecil, M.P. Canon Shuttleworth {the late) Mr. WiU Crooks Earl Spencer Sir A. Conan Doyle Lord Edmund Talbot Earl of ErroU Professor E. J. Urwick Lord George Hamilton Miss Violet Vanbrugh Lord Hartington Duke of Westminster Dean Hensley Henson Mrs. Humphry Ward Rev. Sylvester Home Mr. I. ZangwiU Of some of these meetings Mr. Barnett wrote to his brother : 184 OUT-OF-SIGHT WORKERS This afternoon I have to preside over the Princess Louise, who is going to attend a Country HoHday meeting. To what low uses is Royalty put. She is coming to advertise us just as Millais's " Bubbles " advertises soap. 1886. — On Thursday after a heavy Whitechapel day we went to a drawing-room meeting about Country Holidays. There were some good speeches, a woman spoke best and urged the value of silence for children, a time which they should remember as a time without the noise which ever in town hurtles in their ears. 1897. — On Monday we went to a C.C.H.F. meeting at Lord Hartington's. My wife greatly liked him. He did his work well, taking up and putting all the points simply and strongly. I spoke with my usual inability and the meeting broke out into tea within forty-five minutes. It is only possible to chronicle those who came forward in these organisations, but behind the figure-heads one sees the splendid body of workers — town visitors, country correspondents, members of local committees, the number ever growing as the years passed, until in 1914 it stood at 2,872 ^ ; and beyond them again the unnumbered crowd, teachers, cottagers, village neighbours, railway guards, fellow-passengers, all united by serving the children ; generous service, sacrificing service, effective service given by those who " scorn to blot it with a name." Through aU this growing organisation my husband ever tried to instil one of the deepest principles of our work, which, summed up in three words, embroidered by one friend and framed by another, always faced us in our big drawing-room : ®ne bg ®ne That the remiiider was necessary, aU who deal with large numbers of people will recognise, for subtle and persistent is the temptation to ignore the individual in the mass. To him the individuality of each human being was worthy of reverence. To develop it was a duty, and any step was deprecated which tended to hinder personal relations, even if it simplified machinery, reduced effort, or made it possible 1 The figvires ai-e taken from 1914 Report because it was the last normal year before the war. MISS BEATRICE CHAMBERLAIN 185 to benefit large numbers. He held that the humljlest family's home was better than the most highly organised camp. How he influenced the workers is told by one of them and reported in The East London Observer : At a large gathering of women held in Toynbee Hall on Jane 11th, 1914, to promote a Memorial Fellowship, Miss Beatrice Chamberlain said that in Canon Barnett they found qualities which made him insjiiring as a leader, fertile as an orginator, competent as an organiser ; a man courageous, wise, unselfish, helpful, as full of zeal as of understanding, of charm as of strength. She had the privilege of watching his ways of working for about twenty years in the C.C.H.P. She sometimes asked herself how Canon Barnett managed to fill the workers with so much enthusiasm, and so high a sense of privilege in being allowed to serve. The first thing was that he himself was unselfishly devoted to the cause he had in hand. She could not imagine telling Canon Barnett that she could not do some- thing that was required because she was bored or because she wanted to do something else. He made everything so interesting, that they did not feel there was anything else to do but what he had suggested. Then, how receptive he was of new ideas. It was not with him as with so many who say " This won't do ; that is not what we have done." He was always ready to say, " That is a better idea." There was something about him of the hero of old who went out to fight the dragon, or of Generals who led armies against the foes of humanity. Then his manner of leading was so unassuming. He had so much the appearance of waiting for you to lead and to suggest, so little the attitude of the commander that she did not know whether at the time they all realised how much they were being guided and helped to take the best way, make the most of their own ideas, and to put their strength into them. But afterwards, on reflection, they knew where the real leadership was. He was a great organiser of practical schemes, with rules and methods and the necessary minimum of red tape ; but he never failed to realise that every institution consisted of a number of human beings ; and if any of them were in danger of forgetting that, his vivid sense of it brought them back from the mechanical to the human action. He had knowledge and judgment as well as faith and enthusiasm. But best of all was his power of keeping ideals before himself and his workers. He fixed their attention, because his own eyes were fixed on the beauty of the work to be done and the beauty of service. In 1904 Canon Barnett wrote a pamphlet on Experiences and Hopes for the C.C.H.F., which was, is, and wiU be, interesting. The Children's Country Holiday Fund was born a pimy child and grew slowly. Twenty-seven years ago (1877) nine chil- dren were, at Mrs. Barnett's inspiration, sent from St. Jude's, Whitechapel, to spend a fortnight's holiday with country cot- tagers.^ 1 The number of children who have been sent out is 970,058, and the amount of money expended £699,487, of which the parents contributed £225,571 (1910). 1—14 186 CANON BARNETT'S SURVEY OF 27 YEARS This plan of holiday-giving was begun not only for the sake of health and pleasure. There is truth in the old evangelical teaching that the chief object is salvation of souls, but " salva- tion " must be understood to mean the full development of human nature. It is worth some sacrifice to make children happy and healthy ; it is worth great sacrifice to bring out their powers of thinking, of feeling, and of walking humbly. The plan of giving holidays in cottagers' homes was started with this object ; it placed children in family circles where they might have new experiences of the meaning of family life — " Oh, do send me there to hve," pleaded one child; "there's no fighting and swearing, not even on Sundays " — it furnished their imaginations with the memory of country pursuits and pleasures ; it brought them into contact with Nature as in their freedom they met it in its freedom. Above all, it developed their powers of forming friendship with man and with God. . . The work which was begun in this small way commended itself to all sorts of philanthropic minds. It was economical ; it was something which could be begun and finished ; it had a measurable result in children's pleasure and health. It thus satisfied good people in a hurry, as well as those who believed in the slow development of character. Many individuals "■ adopted the plan, and so some kind of organisation became necessary to prevent that competition in good doing which so often makes charity harmful. The history of the twenty-seven years has, on the whole, been happy. There has been a continuity of pohcy unbroken by any catastrophe, and there has been growth. A survey over the past, as Chairman, shows that there has been constant rivalry between what I may call the forces of freedom and the forces of order. On the side of freedom it has been felt that the chief things are (1) the development of the child's body, mind, heart, and reverence ; (2) the fostering of goodwill between individuals ; and (3) the formation of friend- ships. On the side of order it has been thought all-important (1) that parents' pa3Tnents should be sufficient ; (2) that disease should be prevented ; and (3) that imposture should be checked. It is a great matter to secure the freedom in which a child's character may strengthen itself, and it is also a great matter to secure the order which prevents loss and disease, but obviously the two may clash. My experience is that the cause of free- dom suifers. The disposition to require fixed pajmients from parents grows stronger, parties of children tend to get larger and organised, organising superintendents are more generally ' Among the most active of those early workers for the C.C.H.F. was the Rev. J. Bayfield Clark, who was ever the loyal friend and efficient supporter of my husband. THE FORCES OP FREEDOM AND ORDER 187 advocated in villages, and the way of camps for the many is frequently prefeiTed to that of cottages for the few. There are, doubtless, good argiunents to su]iport such pro- posals. Unscrupulous parents do take advantage to give as pocket-money to their children what they ought to have sub- scribed to the fund. Country correspondents are souietiuies neglectful hosts, and elder boys are often troublesome visitors. There is reason, therefore, in those who ask that parents should pay a fixed amount, that men and women should be employed as superintendents, and that for the unruly the discipline of camps should be substituted for the freedom of the cottages. But it is not always reason, so much as love of ease, wliich desires to put restriction on freedom. It requires time and patience really to interest parents and show them that their meanness will be another child's loss. It involves much exer- cise of thought to rouse up country people to take their share of the town people's burden, and it takes many visits to schools and teachers before children are fitted to go to the country ready to watch Nature and care to listen to her voice. It may bo more expensive, but it is much easier, to pay for camp organisation than to choose cottages carefully and surround the children with influences which, like angels, keep them safe without the check of rules and regulations. It is less trouble to raise money by reports of orderly conduct, and by a show of well-behaved children, than by asking the public to believe in the hidden growth of goodwill, in the increased play of minds, and in the budding of new affections. Reason may require some check on abuses, but reason does not say that more rules are necessary, when time and patience and sympathy would be as effective. Wealth tempts to luxury, and wealthy charities often adopt the luxury of institutions. Institutions are not the glory, they are often the shame of Christian charity. . . What are the hopes of the Children's Country Holiday Fund ? Hope has a far view and a near view. Every charity must hope to make itself unnecessary ; a healthy charity exists to destroy itself. As St. John says, there is no Church in Heaven. The Children's Country Holiday Fund must therefore hope that some day the necessity of a country holiday will be xnd- versally recognised, and that every child out of the resources of its own parents and friends mil enjoy such a holiday. But this end is far off, and the workers, while keeping it in view, must have many nearer hopes on which to rest. Those hopes may b^- First, an extension of the holiday season. The crowding of all holidays into one month is tending to destroy country peace and drown the voices of Nature. The habit of day-treats spreads a wrong idea of pleasure ; it involves the vulgarity of advertise- ISS CANON BARNETT'S HOPES FOR C.C.H.F. ment and dependence on excitement ; it leads children to think there is no enjoyment but that which is made by shouting, by donkey-rides, and by wild play at some popular resort, made as like as possible to a London playground. Our energies sliould go, therefore, to getting schools to take holidays in other moxiths between May and Septemljer, and to discrediting day- treats. Plam speaking among friends is, perhaps, out of fashion, but there is room for some straight, plain speaking, to people who, in the face of knowledge, persist in advertising their churches or schools by monster day-treats. Our second hope should be a closer alliance with other funds. This would prevent competition among charities and over- crowding in cottages. . . Oiu- third hope may be further delegation of the Central Authority. The promise of a wider system of education in London has caused a thrill of expectation, and it now seems fairly certain that under one Educational Authority responsible Committees will be established in defined areas. It would be possible for each of such Committees to appoint a " Cliildrcn Committee,' ' composed of its own members and other interested persons. This Committee should be a permanent body and have under its care all the interests of children when out of school hours. It would, for instance, arrange for their play- hours, for Saturday outings and visits, for provision of neces- sary meals, breakfasts or dinners, and for the management of vacation schools. Its members should know the children and their parents in an intimate way : thus in the summer they would be qualified to arrange the summer holiday with an efficiency born of knowledge. . . These hopes, as they are realised, would allow room for the action of personal care and for the enthusiasm wliich comes of originality. If, as it seems to me, there are now fewer signs of personal care and of enthusiasm than in the earlier days, it is, 1 believe, because there is less room for original action. My hope, therefore, is that with the old ideal of the salvation of the child, more room may be given for new developments, for change, for original advice, which may even frighten some of us who are familiar with the ways of twenty-seven years. Of one thing I am certain, and with this I conclude. If the Children's Country Holiday Fund does not draw to itself the patience, the devotion, the sacrifice, and the enthusiasm of indi- viduals, it can never succeed in making itself unnecessary. Few things gratined and touched Canon Barnett more than the refusal of the Council to accept liis resignation of the Chairmanship tendered in 1912, because the weak condition of his heart made it undesirable to walk up the steep stairs to the office at 18, Bucldngham Street. NATURE STUDY FOR CHILDREN 189 " As you cannot come to us, the Executive means to come to you," wrote our friend Mss Beatrice Chamberlain ; and so after that decision the C.C.H.F. Committee met in the dining-room of our house in the Westminster Cloisters. Later, however, advancing ill-health made it necessary for liim to reserve what strength he had for his Abbey duties, and on January 16th, 1913, he felt it to be fair to write as follows : My dbae Viob-Chaieman, — The time has come when I feel I must say "Goodbye" to the Committee. It is hard to do so, but when weak health prevents work, the clear duty is resignation. I feel greatly the severance of such an old tie, and as I write I am conscious of all I have gained for heart and mind at the meetings. There has been a wonderful succession of members, and the Committee has never been satisfied just to walk in the steps of its predecessors. I am proud and grateful, and as I say " Goodbye," I offer such service in the future as I can possibly give, though T am confident that the Committee has in itself strength which will more than outweigh my absence. To yourself, who have so long and so generously covered my deficiencies, I am specially grateful. Ever yom's, Samuel A. Baenbtt. To Feancis Moeeis, Esq.^ In 1898 my husband and I took part of our hohday bicycling to visit the children in the country. We were charmed but not surprised at their dehght in their freedom, the kindness of the cottage hostesses, the interest of the village residents, from the squire and the parson to the farm hand who mounted adventurous boys on the huge bare- backed horses ; but we were also sorry because the amazing ignorance of the childi-en deprived them of the pleasures they could have had by inteUigent interest in the sights and sounds of the country, and because they played, amid all its wonders, only their often degraded to^vn games. llr. Barnett did not hke the study of Natural History. I have never known any man who revelled as he did in Nature's beauties, yet for what he called dissecting them he had no sympathy. But I felt that the curiosity inherent ' Now the Chairman, with patient enthusiasm keeping the Society up to its full working capacity. 190 THEIR 6,745 LETTERS in children, if turned on to the facts in the world of Nature, would provide for them the best of present and future country joys. So on returning home I started, with one of the Toynbee Residents, Mr. R. E. S. Hart,^ a small effort in the hope of interesting children sent from East London to — observe the bixds and flowers, the sky and animals, for we believe that in so doing they may find pleasure and profit, and that by degrees observa- tion will develop both reverence and care.^ We asked the children questions and they wrote letters ; and to the best we awarded prizes of flower-pictures and books on ants, bees, birds, and animals, and it was great fun. Then in 1903 the Children's Country Holiday Fund adopted my baby, and we were turned into a Committee, of which I am still the Chairman, and Mrs. Douglas Wilson the wonderful Hon. Secretary ; and now we have rules and regulations, rambles, lantern- talks, trophies, great prize-givings, and dehghtful co-operatively written printed letters, to wliich in 1914 no less than 6,745 children wrote replies — precious documents, some full of patient observa- tion, others shomng flashes of poetic insight or subtle sym- pathy with our brothers the beasts, some humorous in their gay unconsciousness, some shocking in their sordid out- look, and all pathetic in the enjoyment of regular meals, rehef from responsibihties, and the surprise of better health. Some of the remarks are worth quoting : " The grass-hopper is a very lightsome insect." " One of the sheep was named Lord Kitchener. Wherever it went the other sheep would follow it." " The cow has large thoughtful ej'es, and is an oblong animal." " I have heard of a small bird Ti'hich had a very large appetite. In one day it ate one hundred and forty-four insects, assorted, twelve grasshoppers, twelve meal worms, one caterpillar, and fifteen flies." " The poppy loves to intrude amongst the corn." " I went every mornmg to the mflk factory to get some milk and cream." " The pig whose body is made of pork, bacon and dripping." " The stream in the vQlage was very happy, jump- ing from ledge to ledge." " The lady did our hairs and said ' Good-night,' and we went upstairs to bed. The sheets were lovely and white." " The most unhappy day of that lovely fortnight was when we had to pack our boxes and prepare for home." " We sang in the train coming home to keep ourselves from crying because we were so sorry to leave the nice country." " My little brother was glad to see me back again. He looked as white as snow and I looked brown." ' Of the Board of Education. '^ Town Ghildren and Country Interests, by Mrs. S. A. Bamett. MR. F. MORRIS 191 How pathetic are the last three entries, for it was not only the conclusion of the hohday that made the writers sad. Some town children have a genuine love for the country. I enjoyed myself very much, I cannot explain how much. Please God next year I will come again. As I sit at school I always imagine myself roaming in the fields and watching the golden com, and when I think of it, it makes me cry. And those tears wiU find companions in the hearts which ache for the joyless hves of our town children, weighted by responsibiUties, crippled by poverty, robbed of their birth- right of innocent fun. The ecstatic joy of children in re- sponse to such simple pleasures tells volumes about their drab existence, as their appreciation of adequate food and their warm recognition of kindness represent privation and surprise. In a deeper sense than Wordsworth used it, " Their gratitude has left me mourning." I know, and no one better, the countless servants of the people who are toiling to relieve the sorrows of the poor and their children, but until the conditions of labour, of education, and housing, are fearlessly faced and radically dealt with, their labour can only be paUiative and their efforts barren of the best fruit. Perhaps one of the flowers that wiU grow from the blood-soaked roots of war will be the estabUshment of more people on the land. This chapter can close with an extract from the Annual Report of the C.C.H.F. and a letter signed by Mr. F. Morris, for whom my husband had so great an appreciation. Until the last few months of his long and eventful life Canon Bamett remained the Chairman of the Children's Country Holiday Fund, inspiring his fellow-workers, welcoming fresh suggestions arising from any source, realising with prophetic instinct what was valuable and desirable to make permanent, or what was merely effervescent, or an eddy in the main stream. As Chairman he was both firm and patient, helping every member of the Committee, even amid conflicting interests, to realise the other person's point of view, and through all seeking and maintaining peace ; creating as it were a large canopy of peace under which individual roots of effort, stimulus, restraint, and individuahty grew and brought forth varied flowers of service for childhood. That his influence did not end with his life the following touching letter indicates : 192 MRS. HAROLD SPENDER'S POEM CHILDREN'S COUNTRY HOLIDAY FUND To the Editor oj " The Times" July 14th, 1913 Sir, — It was Canon Bamett's wish, written in a letter dated July 1st, 1909, and left to be opened after his death, that flowers should not " spend themselves on my dead body, but in giving joy and comfort to living people." This wish a small group of his friends, led by Mrs. Harold Spender, endeavoured to carry out by suggesting in the letter signed by the Bishop of London (and others) which you, Sir, were good enough to publish, that all " those who would have Liked to send some floral tribute should give such assistance to this fund as to enable more children to go into the country to learn lessons from the flowers." As Chairman of the Pund I have just received the sum of £160 8s. lOd., and the accompanying pathetic poem addressed to Mrs. Bamett from Mrs. Harold Spender, who adds the money was " given lovingly and coUeoted lovingly." To Mrs. Bamett This little token we have brought To show our love and grateful thought Of you and him, who helped us ever To raise our minds to high endeavour. He wished that summer's blossoms brave Should live — not die upon his grave ; So we'U take children from the street And let them play in meadows sweet. And resting in the hedgerow's shade Feel God is good and all He made. For you and he together cared To make God's gifts and treasures shared. Just as God wills, by every one, Not all for some, for others none. You and your loved one sowed the seed Of many a noble thought and deed ; And your good thought by God's good grace Shall make each solitary place And wilderness rejoice with singing Till all the desert shall be ringing With joy ; and where now nothing grows Shall bloom abundantly the rose. Violet Spender, Thus, by this personal effort, unorganised and unadvertised, some 320 more children will go into the country for two weeks this year than other- wise could have been sent, a " floral tribute " in accord with our late Chairman's spirit, and one that will " give joy to living (little) people." The names of the donors will be published m the Annual Report of the Children's Country Holiday Fund, which will be sent to each in due course. I am. Sir, yours truly, Francis Morris. CHAPTER XVI " A man may be a Christian and a soldier. . . The least self-assertive individual may fight to destroy tyranny." During the early years of our Whitechapel life, 1873 to 1880, Mr. Barnett liked fighting. Most young men do, and he fought with passion for the pubhc good. Among the conflicts in which he engaged was one against a tripe- boihng estabhshment, " the effluvia of which pours into your neighbours' windows." Another resulted in a sum- mons against the proprietor of the " Angel " pubhc- house. The local press reported : 1878. — Police-Constable 218H deposed that on the evening of the 3rd inst. he heard screams proceeding from the defendant's house, and going to the door saw two women on the floor in front of the bar. They were fighting and tearing each other's hair. He separated them, and one went out. Both were drunk, and the defendant's attention was called to the woman who remained. He said she was not drunk and refused to put her out. . . Mr. Bushby dismissed the summons. It was this criminal indifference of the magistrates to the standards of conduct in such pubhc-houses that added to the difficulty of teaching the people self-respect, and made the Vicar anxious to fight the iniquities of small badly- hghted half-hidden beer-houses, " sing-songs " in gin palaces, and " friendly leads " in pubhc-houses. 1877. — We ought to make a direct effort agaiast these evils ; fights between the drunken are of daily occurrence, and the gutters of the streets are sometimes lined with drunken women. This could not be if the law were observed and the publicans refused to serve those who were already intoxicated. The police have failed to check this abuse, and we want, therefore, the help of those who, watching, will be able to give such evidence as will justify the magistrates in punishing . the drunken, and in reducing the ntimber of licensed houses by refusing licences to those who conduct their business badly, liouses arranged for the comfort rather than for the dazzling of the guests, and 193 1»4 DIVISION OE PAEISHES the law strictly administered, would, I think, be more powerful in diminishing drunkenness than either legislation or a teetotal crusade. . . As the last sentence shows, Mr. Barnett recognised the value of counter-attractions and supported the Cafe Com- pany which owed its inception to Miss Emma Cons and Mr. and Mrs. Ernest Hart. With Bishop Jackson my husband had a lively alterca- tion, which the Rev. V. A. Boyle summarised as follows : The Mission District of St. Augustine's was carved out of St. Philip's, Stepney, and supported by the Bishop's Fund. The district wanted to be a separate parish. The promise had been made of help to buEd a Church if a site could be secured. The Bishop was prepared to redeem the promise when, led by Sir. Barnett, the neighbouring parsons, among whom were the Rev. Harry Jones, the Rev. J. Kitto, and the Rev. Dr. Alexander Ross, produced an influentiaUy signed petition against building the Church on seven grounds, three of which were that : " Any increase in the number of nearly empty or only haU-fiUed Churches is not likely to advance the cause of true religion." " If a new Church is built it should occupy a prominent position in a main thoroughfare, and not be thrust into a back street." " We should greatly grieve to have amongst us yet one more monument to spread the fact that the Church of England has failed to gain the masses of the working-classes to the Lord." The Bishop's contention was that, whether Bishop Blomfield's policy of multiplying Churches until there was one for every 4,000 or so of popula- tion was right or wrong, the Bishop of London's Fund was committed to it untQ the policy was altered, and as regards St. Augustine's he was com- pelled to redeem the pledge given. From his letters may be gathered the good Bishop's annoyed surprise at receiving from " his esteemed clergy " a bombshell like their petition ! " What can be gained," he wrote, — " when the matter is so far advanced that I could not draw back even it I wished to do so — by placing me in a position of antagonism with some of my clergy, I cannot understand." For those who do not know East London, it is well to add that St. Augustine's was built, and — ■ Draws as large and indeed a larger congregation than most of the neigh- bourmg Churches. Its ritual is that of the extreme High-church party. So perhaps my husband was wrong, but he never failed to protest against the division of big parishes, arguing that there ought to be more scope in the Church for men with powers of organisation and force of personality. " There are no adequate places for the best men unless they consent to become Bishops," he used to say, " and then they are apt to be strangled by their own gaiters." With the help of Mr. James Bonar, then an undergraduate lodging in Arbour Square, Mr. Barnett arranged a public THE " DUST DISTRIBUTOR " 195 meeting to protest against the war vote during the " Jingo " agitation against Russia — 1876. The bills for the expenses of the meeting include one for " the repair of broken plat- form, tables, seats, desks, and various furniture " ; for the audience showed their disapproval of peace talk by war- like action, and wielded chair backs and table legs to enforce their opinions. The dust-destructor, which we renamed the " dust- distributor," was a matter of contention with the authorities : first, because the dust from the houses of the rich was brought to be consumed amid the homes of the poor — aU day long uncovered carts filled with rubbish, often smeUing offensively, passed under the windows of the peoples' one- roomed homes, the dust flying freely ; and secondly because the refuse was so inadequately consumed that — ■ 1889.— The destructor in Wentworth Street vomits fortli its clouds of dust, chokes the drains, and makes harder that fight with dirt in which so many of the poor show heroic quaUties, and in which so many give up, letting in on their homes drink, gambling, and sloth. After one of Mr. Barnett's pubUc complaints, we were officially invited to view the destructor and its apphances, with which we were duly impressed, but the practice did not support the theory, and the additional cost of clearing gutters, cleaning windows, and washing curtains was con- siderable in our large estabhshment, a minor evil compared mth the permeating dust in the homes of the thousands who Uved under the smoke-shadow of that giant chimney. My husband joined in the fight which Mr. Charles Brad- laugh and Mrs. Besant made for the right of free publica- tion in 1877, for though he deplored their views on birth- control — holding aU methods wrong except self-control — and foresaw the significance to the nation if their teaching was obeyed, he yet felt the dangers of a gagged press to be so grave that he advocated freedom. But then in aU matters he trusted in God^ — good — more than he feared the Devil — evil — and so was fearless of spreading opinion. 1890. — It is the old tale — as soon as man learns to speak, he learns also to he ; but then it is good to learn to speak. Very early in our Whitechapel life Mr. Bamett began his fight against the Sunday Fair in Petticoat Lane : 196 PETTICOAT LANE 1882. — On Sunday mornings, Middlesex Street is the resort of some thousands of men from all parts of London. They gather for pleasures which are generally thought to be the curse of a race-course — card-sharpers, thimble-riggers, and swindlers of all sorts pursue their callings unchecked. . . What was once a market of old clothes established by the Jews on their first day of the week is now a noisy fair to which idlers and gamblers are drawn from all parts of London . . . A few years later he made a serious demand that the evil should be faced. 1889. — The Sunday fair in Petticoat Lane increases in size, and the adjoining streets are now filled with loafers from all parts of London, dra-vsii together by the attractions of cheap- jacks, cordials, and the excitement of a crowd. The local public opinion, which ought to condemn such things, has become de- moralised, . . . and has allowed the habit of Sunday trading to increase. . . Shops of all sort are opened and contempt for law is encouraged. If it be that some buying must take place on Sundajr, better would it be to make such buying legal within certain hours, and after these hours strictly to enforce the closing of the shops. The policy of " drift " which of late years has become fashionable is disastrous when drift takes people from their firm anchorage in principle and bears them on to a raging storm of conflicting interests. Sunday observance is a duty or it is not a duty. If it is a duty, it must be protected by the appreciation of a principle recognised as obligatory by the rich who use the day for pleasure, and by the poor who use the day for gain. How useless were all Mr. Barnett's efforts can be seen by anyone who wiU take the train to Aldgate station any Sunday at noon. Perhaps he would still bid us hope for reform, for to quote him again : 1890. — "When the tale of bricks is doubled, then Moses comes," and when the streets are quite impassable and the corruption of character is evident in active vice, then, perhaps, some strong arm will drive out the cheap-jacks, the gamblers, and the sellers of stolen property. Anyone who went to what was called " the Red Church " in the Bethnal Green Road could be married free. Against this practice Mr. Barnctt protested, for the couples had to say they lived in the parish, " thus beginning their new life by a he," and the unseemly scenes amid the crowds who gathered were common gossip. Regarding the parishioners of St. Jude's, Mr. Polyblank wrote : SLAUGHTER-HOUSES 107 Many couples in the parish were then living in sin because they said they could not aitord the cost of marriage in the Church. " I can make no charge for God's blcssuig," Mr. Jiarnott said, so the people who were legally entitled to do so came, and ho trusted them to pay what they could alt ord. Mr. Barnett felt strongly that the services connected with birth, marriage, and death should be conducted not only with reverence to God, but with reverence to humanity however fallen, though it was often diflficult to quiet the ribald excitement engendered by the occasion. At these times the hearts of those present are specially open to emotion, and on the rare occasion of their coming to C'hiu-ch it must he disappointing to them to find themselves treated with business-like dispatch. . . It is altogether good that the Church building in the parish should be associated with the thoughts roused at the solemn crises in hfe, and there are many hundreds to whom St. Jude's will now suggest memories which may have hopes. The cemetery chapel, with its cold formal service, has damped many a feeling kindled by the Angel of Death when he comes to teach the poor the poetry of life. Against the retention of the slaughter-houses in Aldgate Mr. Barnett persistently fought, and indeed it was a homble sight to see the herds of cattle driven through the White- chapel streets, followed by troops of cruel boys who goaded the frightened beasts with pin-pointed sticks and hideous cries. Sometimes the poor creatures would entangle their great horns in the spokes of moving wheels, and the cries of inarticulate pain from dumb fellow-creatures are not easily forgotten. Sometimes in their fear they would rush on to the pavement, scattering the pedestrians whether they were hale and young, or pregnant women and frail folk. Around the slaughter-houses, where the sheep were dragged in backwards by their legs, the buUoeks hounded in by dogs and blows, the children would stand eager for fresh sights of blood, excited by the horror and danger of the scenes. In vain Mr. Barnett protested to the authorities and attacked the abuse in the Press, urging pubhe abattoirs. The landlords, the trade, and the conservatism of the people were too strong to get anything done. Mr. Polyblank wrote : Mr. Barnett received the most scurrilous and cruel letters that could possibly be written, when he questioned and attacked the sanitary condi- tions of the slaughter-houses in Butcher's Row, Aldgate. . . Indcoil in many of his eSorts to get things better, every hand was against him. 198 UNLOVING THEOLOGY Among the papers kept is a correspondence with the Rector of Spitahields, whom in my fearless youth I attacked because, after being pressed, I had taken our Sunday-school children to a united service in his Church. I wrote to him : Believing in the Almighty as a source of love, ... I heaid, and deeply regret that our children heard, God spoken of as a harsh tyrant, the children urged " to know Jesus " for fear that God should soon " summon them " and " turn them into everlasting fire where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth." Apart from the question of the truth ; apart from the wrong of teaching children to fear punishment and not sin ; apart from the lowness of the motive which places pain as the only deterrent, I appeal to you whether you think it courteous or right to invite the school children of the clergy of all opinions, and then to provide them with a teacher of strong party views. The Rector's reply was very angry and written " in haste," and so best forgotten, except two sentences ; The preacher was invited . . . because of his acknowledged ability to preach to children. . . What was said in our Church last Sunday would be uttered in substance by nine out of ten of the clergy of the various schools of thought in the Church. And yet the clergy wondered that people did not worship their God. I can still see that terrible parson, tall, gaunt, clothed wholly in black, Ufting up his arms till his gown looked like huge wings, and descending the first few steps of the lofty pulpit, saying " Do\vn, doown, doowwnnn," as a suit- able illustration of the fate of unconverted children. As President of the Whitechapel and District Liberal Association, Mr. Barnett fought for years difficult battles connected with the organisation of what was knoAvn as the Liberal Three Hundred. The chief offenders are dead and it is better not to give pain to those they have left behind, but the papers and accounts indicate how conscientiously my husband fought, writing down for his ovsm guidance the points in favour of the defaulters, and the excuses that could be made for their wrong- doing. I did not sympathise with Mr. Barnett's holding so pro- minent a position in a pohtical caucus, for parsons are usually not helped to lead their parisliioners towards spiritual fife by vexing their political opponents ; but the sitting member, Mr. James Bryce,^ and my husband were knit together by deep friendship, and he felt that through pohtical 1 Now Viscount Bryce. CORPORAL PUNISHMENT 199 associations he came into contact with a body of men who cared for progress, but whom he touched through no other channel. Perhaps too I was somewhat influenced by the ■wish to save the Vicar work. In one account twenty- six meetings and two entertainments are shown as having taken place in a httle over a year, and as the administra- tion was aU done from St. Jude's School-house, it meant constant reference to and responsibihty for him. Neither in those days was Mr. Barnett adverse to using corporal punishment or physical force. At Egloshayle, where he had taken hohday duty, the house-boy repeatedly played truant, returning with ingenious hes. All higher arguments having failed, my husband determined to thrash him, which he personally did tiU the walking-stick broke ! On another occasion his father's coachman — later our pen- sioner — who had come to fetch us at the station after a long day's excursion, soon showed that he was drunk. In a moment my husband, fearful that his mother would be alarmed, had leapt over the back of the carriage, seized William, and deposited him in the road, where he left him. With the first secretary of the central office of the C.O.S. Mr. Barnett also contended, beheving that his spirit of suspicion of the poor was injurious to the Society. He was a vigorous forcible person from whom my sensitive husband instinctively shrank, but after he, in conjunction with Miss Octavia Hill and other members of the Society, had decided that the services of their secretary had better be dispensed with, Mr. Barnett thought it right to tell him that the httle group meant, if they could, to dislodge him. He dreaded the difficult interview, and I went with him to encourage him, and walked up and down Buckingham Street — where the office then was — until he came out. " WeU," I said, " what did he say ? " " I had hoped he would see," replied my husband, " that for the good of the Society he had better retire, but he does not, and so now we shall have to fight him." It v/as that unvanquishable behef that men would be always ready to subordinate their private welfare to the public good that made many of those he called leave all and follow him into fresh fields of service. And alongside of these incidental fights was waged the 200 THE BEST FOR THE LOWEST continual war against the housing conditions, the struggle to prevent relief under the Poor Law demoraUsing the people, and the contest with the authorities for wider education. Fighter as he was, Mr. Barnett always fought with good temper, absence of personal feeling, and a steadfast faith in the conquest of what was right. He used to grieve to stick his knife into his opponent, but he stuck it in all the same, and struck hard. With me it was different. For this he rebuked me : " You are ready to fight the wrongs and you hke preparing for the battle, but you cry when the enemy bleeds, and that weakens me." Still, he fought on, demanding ever the best for the lowest. Mrs. VViUiam Blyt-h, one of our earliest fellow- workers, writing her remmiscences, said : To those who-se idea of the work of a parish was at all conventional, that at St. Jude's was a revelation. " Nothing short of the best " was the motto of whatever was attempted. . . No one who was associated, even for a short time, and who entered into the spirit of its Vicar and his wife, could ever return to conventional ideas of Church life and Church work, or could fail to realise that all good social work is religious, and should be undertaken as part of God's service. CHAPTER XVII " The sense that something must be done against poverty, ignorance, and sin is a divine heritage in humanity. If the stronger members of society left the weaker alone . . . the strong would lose more than the weak.'" As soon as he was qualified as a ratepayer, Mx. Barnett became a Guardian of tlie Whitechapel Union, having been nominated by the Local Government Board. He held the position for twenty-nine years, and for part of that time was Chairman. In 1869 Mr. Goschen, who was then Presi- dent of the Poor Law Board, circulated a memorandum advocating the restriction of out-door rehef which was in full force, no less than 3,931 Whitechapel persons being in receipt of out- rehef on January 1st, 1870. Under the dominating influence of Mr. T. Brushfield, the Board had determined to reduce the out-rehef, and on the correspond- ing date three years later — when my husband joined — the figures had fallen to 1,165, a reduction of nearly 70 per cent., and the decrease continued. On January 1st, 1876, only 420 apphcants were so reheved, and on the same day in 1877 the figure was but 122. The pursuit of tliis policy involved great suffering ; and though the Union was so pauperised that strong decisive action had to be taken, yet most of those concerned hved to wish it had been done with more courtesy of manner, consideration of individual circumstances, and the recognition of the need of reform of the social conditions which had degraded the people. The Board-room was large and furnished with the horse- shoe table usually occupying such offices. At the top sat the Chairman, the apphcants approaching him by walking up the room between the two arms of the horseshoe table. " The House " was the decision usuaUy snapped out by the Chairman, often before the appUcant had stated his case, or the Guardians had had any opportunity of giving their opinions. 1—15 201 202 ABOLITION OF OUT-REIIEF " The House 1 " would whine some poor wdowed creature who preferred to starve herself and to see her children starve than be separated from them, " can't your honour ? " "I said 'the House,'" would repeat the Chairman in no gentle tone, and sign to the reheving officer that he was ready for the next case. " The House, is it ? " said one burly buUy : " I'll give yer the House," and before anyone saw his intention he had whipped out a bottle from beneath his rags and raised it to hurl a blow which, had it fallen, must have kiUed Mr. Brushfield. The upUfted arm was caught in time and the Guardians were properly shocked at the occurrence, but I felt that half-fed paupers were not usually brave men, and that the poor creature must have sorely suffered before he had resorted to action so desperate. Mr. Barnett warmly supported the pohcy of abohshing oui^rehef , and many a discussion did we hold on it ; for I thought then, and I think now, that with their mother, even in a poor home, children are best reared ; and the decision, given almost without exception to a widow, that the Guar- dians would take most of her children into the pauper schools and leave her one or two to support, seemed to me a cruel pohcy. It gave her an impossible task, which could only result in half-starving the children, double-working the mother ; and by keeping her incessantly absent at labour, it rendered the word " home" a mockery. I used to argue that women were paid to tend the children of the rich, therefore why not pay women to tend the children of the poor, and what women could be so suitable as their mothers ? ^ Pharaoh's daughter had found that out.. But my husband thought that the pauper spirit which poisoned the masses of the indigent was a national evil which would become M'orse, and that, Uke wise physicians, we must bear to inflict suffering if it were necessary to effect a cure. He also felt very strongly the impertinence of judging who was " deserving " of rehef. Who is to be the judge of character ? Who is to say that A. shall have out-relief and B. go into the Infirmary, that C. is to be treated as if he were an honoured guest and D. as if he were a cruninal ? It may be that B. has fought temptations, 1 This principle is now being advocated by Judge Neil as " Mother's Pensions," and is supported by the State Children's Association and also at the Trades Union Conference, January 1918. DIFFICULTY OF JUDGING CHARACTER 203 and had trials which have never come near to A., and that D, has done kindnesses and helped others as C. never dreamed of doing. There is no way in which strangers can judge charac- ter ; the good and the evil must be let grow together ; and he who attempts to separate them will destroy the good with the evil. Beyond this there is something humiliating, a loss of self- respect, which is entailed in submitting to such judgment. The secrets and sorrows of a man's life are his own ; his efforts to save, his charities to children or to friends, his afflictions, the sins of his youth, are not for public use, and he who is called on to expose them suffers irreparably in character. There is a necessary modesty for the character as there is for the person.^ Of the bad effect of out-reKef on the characters of the applicants Mr. Barnett had no doubt, holding that — The weekly dole, or " out-relief," administered by a relieving officer bound to suspect every assertion, brings out the gi'eed of the. applicant, destroys his self-respect, checks his energies, and has had a distinct effect in keeping down wages. The 420,057 who receive out-relief are not in the real sense relieved. They have to go hat in hand to the relieving officer. They have to submit to his questions, and at last receive what must be grudgingly given. . . They may not show signs of the wound their natm-e bears . . . but human nature deeply feels sever- ance from its kind.^ In 1878 he reported that the abolition had been persisted in " with manifest advantage to the ratepayers and to the poor," and twenty years after out- relief had been abohshed in Whitechapel, and while we w^ere still living there and able to see results, Canon Barnett wrote in The Nineteeiith Century : 1891. — Under the new system the first result has been that the poor receive more nearly enough. I am not prepared to say that they receive enough — I have a standard of life which cannot be reached by the income which just keeps body and soul together — but 1 do say that in 1890 the poor have got more nearly enough than in 1870, and they have got it in a way which was impossible by an out-relief system. They now receive their gifts after a patient consideration of their needs and with a friendliness for their human character which no busy relieving officer could afford. . . The second result has been a distinct growth in habits of self- rehance. Men and women who, in the old time of parish doles, were tempted to hang about ui the hope of something, have set to work. . . The action of the Guardians, even where it is 1 Practicable Socialism, Becond series, published by Messrs. Longmans, Green & Co. 204 ASSISTANCE THROUGH FRIENDSHIP not approved, is understood, and regular action is always the best to work with. One temptation to beg has been removed, and with fewer disappointed applicants there is less ill-will. Whitechapel people — I do not speak of the large crowd of casuals and loafers attracted to the neighbourhood by shelters, com- mon lodgings, and free meals — are more independent, better off, and happier than in old times. . . It is only those who have known the district many years who can judge the improvement. The " new system " referred to was the method adopted for those to whom the Guardians had refused out-relief. First, they were sent to the Charity Organisation Society, where, after investigation under the kindly eye of Mr. Leonard, who was acting as the Secretary of the Whitechapel C.O.S., adequate help in various ways was organised for their benefit. Very thoroughly was each case investigated, not to find deserts or deUnquencies, but to ascertain the characters, tastes, and potentialities of " the neighbour who had fallen by the way." Neither were the applicants for- gotten after they had received the initial help, for the large body of workers, who were attracted by the social experiment, enabled regular visits to be paid to all. Mr. Barnett described the effect of such friendship on one family : James and Mary M are old people. They are both delicate, and owing to failing eyesight the man has had to give up his employment and keep a street stall during the summer. In the winter an allowance was granted sufficient for their daily needs, and in the spring money to stock the stall was supplied. The landlord, who lived in a distant part of London, was visited, and was induced to defer immediate pressure for back rent. When the summer came and the stall was bruiging m a fair return they were not forgotten. The friend who every week had brought them their allowance continued her visits. Her words and acts of kindness had secured their confidence, and she was trusted ^\'ith the care of the profits which remained after all outgoings and all debts had been paid. At the end of the summer there were eight pounds in hand. . . Here is an example of relief, adequate, given with time, thought, and friendliness, which no busy relieving officer could command. Out-relief, ec[ual perhaps in amoimt but drawn from rates, grudgingly given, would have provoked a sullen and rm- helpful disposition. Charity drawn from contributions willingly given, not only put money into the pockets of the old people, but courage into their hearts. Perhaps it was the work which Mr. Barnett undertook in relation to the abolition of out-relief which gave him his INTIMATE KNOWLEDGE OP THE POOR 205 extraordinary knowledge of the lives of the poor. Every Board day when rehef cases came on the agenda, he went and stood behind the Chairman, read the application forms, and observed with his keen brown eyes the poor creatures, who timidly or sullenly awaited sentences affecting their whole hves from the unfriendly voices of strangers. As ]Mr. Brushfield got to trust him, the Vicar would whisper suggestions of further inquiry, or put searching questions to the reheving officer, or advise the apphcant what to do. In every instance he took down the names and addresses, and then he or I or one of our workers would go to the poor home or shelter, regardless of parochial boundaries, not to interfere with the work of neighbouring parsons, but as a Guardian visiting an apphcant. Very close in friendship became some of those famihes whose acquaintance we made when crushed into hope- lessness by the refusal of the parish pittance — a refusal \^'hich if they had formerly been ratepayers they felt mth the bitterness of a denied right. Neither did the friendships wane when the period of helplessness was over. It is Ijut a few months ago that I was presented with a garment, every stitch of which was sewn by the trembling old fingers of one who is now the nation's pensioner, but then, thirty- eight years ago, was a young widow with five chikken. " The House for aU, or the Schools for three and you can support two," she was told. " I cannot part with them. IMinnie is so fond of home, and Phihp is so dehcate — I cannot," she said, and I agreed with her. So one room was made to suffice, and into that the new mangle was crowded. The children were half- fed, but clean, happy, and affectionate. Once when the mother fell iU, they were sent into the pauper schools, only to be fetched out after the first visiting day, one with ringworm, one with ophthalmia, all five cowed by the di-eary duUing disciphne necessary when hundi-eds of children are gathered together. Dear brave httle widow ! How she slaved, and starved, and loved, and made those of us who hved easily, feel ashamed. It would take too long to teU how the splendid sturdiness of her character gradually won for her more responsible work and consec[uently better pay, but all the children survived, and though they are still handicapped in hfe's race by being under-sized, their hearts are fuU of love and reverence for their mother, whose latter days they are tending with comforts and consideration. 206 AFTER TWENTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE Of another family whose circumstances made adequate assistance very difficult, my husband, eighteen years after he had first met the mother in the Board-room, wrote : 1894. — Mi's. A was a Mddow with four girls. She had no trade, and so tried to get a living by selling songs in the streets — another name for begging. She applied for out-relief in 1876. It was refused, but according to the Guardians' custom she was referred to the care of some charitable people. She now met a friend instead of an official, one who was glad to consider all the circumstances and ready to share heart as well as purse. She was helped to a decent room and was found regular work as a scrubber, and subsequently as an office-keeper. Her chil- dren were sent to school, and ultimately to places of service. Every week, year after year, she was kept in touch with her hopes, as the same friend visited her, encouraged her, helped her over obstacles, and gave her the pleasure of change. The children have all done well, and the woman herseh is now — 1894 — living as an honoured and respected guest in the comfortable home of her eldest daughter. If she had received out-relief, she would have met at the pay - table persons with whom association must have been degradation, she would have had to uncover her circumstances to strangers' gaze, she would have been conscious that the relieving officer was regarding her with suspicion, she would probably have resented the in- justice of her treatment when compared with that of less worthy neighbours. Her children, growing up in the atmo- sphere of dependence and resentment, might not have developed the qualities of industry and self-reliance which have now raised them to good positions ; they would have missed the glow of friendly care which has warmed their hearts into corresponding friendliness and goodwill. This is no imaginary case. AH through these forty years we have kept in friendly touch with Mrs. A , her children and grandchildren, who now — 1916 — no longer living in Whitechapel, but occupying the position of the seK-depen- dent and seK-respecting industrial classes, maintain the friendship by the usual channels of social communication, and never fail to visit us when in town. My husband held that the refusal of out-rehef was the root from which grew redeeming effort and goodwill, and when some fifteen years ago there was a widespread demand to return to the system of loosely given inadequate out- rehef, he wrote strongly : The system adopted by the Whitechapel Guardians had good results, measured by an observer whose standard is " the best RESULTS OF ABOLITION OF OUT-RELIEF 207 for the poor, who as men and women are kin to the highest." The Board oiiered day by day an object-lesson in justice and kindness, and a Board's effect on conceptions of social duty is often more important than its direct action. Its education of opinion reaches further than its deeds. A new generation has now become the critic of a system which tliirty years ago was new. This generation does not know what an improvement the present is on the past, and has not taken pains to trace the causes of the improvement. It sees the poverty of the present ; out-relief is the simplest way of meeting poverty, and so it incUnes to reintroduce out-reliof. I would, however, enter two cautions out of my own experi- ence. The first is that there is no royal road by which the poor can be made rich. The improvement must come by growth from within, and not by accretions from without. The efiective help is that which strengthens character. My second caution is against a too hasty contempt of past practices. The practice of out-relief and the practice of no out-relief have been tried. It is wiser to study each, to find out what has really happened under each administration, than it is to argue from theory, or without thought to swing from one system to another. The danger of many of our critics, who are ahve to the suSermgs of poverty, is hurry. They feel what their neighbours endure ; they have not been trained to think ; they have never learnt history ; they have control of the rates ; and the simplest course is to give out-relief. Human nature inchnes to resent trouble, especially the trouble of study ; but they who would act helpfully in this matter must restrain their emotions and conquer their indolence, while they take the trouble to consider experience. Those who criticise the present must study the past. It may be that society ought to be reorganised — that is matter for another argument ; but while society is on its pre- sent basis there is abundant proof that the poor are better off when Guardians refuse out-relief, and bring to their service the goodwill of charity. If the opposite policy be adopted and out-relief be again given, the out-relief must be adequate — not the insufficient dole of old days, but enough to relieve the apphcant both from starvation and the necessity of further begging. It must also be very widely given. If it be refused, except on grounds ap- proved by the common opinion, the refusal will excite general discontent. But if it be widely given, habits of self-reliance will be weakened, the thoughts of many will be unsettled, wages will be reduced, and the rates will be raised. Imagine for a moment how a system of out-rehef must work out in practice. A. applies and makes out a case which justifies relief, and receives an adequate amount. B. apphes, and hig 208 ACTION MISUNDERSTOOD case, although not so good as that of A., is still near enough to make refusal impossible. C. apphes, who again is very like B., and so on through the whole alphabet, till Z. can justify his claim although he is so far from A. If the relieving officer at any point attempts to draw a line, there is complaining and unrest which no argument can meet, so like are the cases refused to the cases accepted. If, on the other hand, the relieving officer gives to every applicant, the burden on the rates becomes intolerable ; the fountains of charity are dried up ; the thought and the friendship and the family love which have so much softened and straightened human relations are weakened ; the goodwill which has raised the demand for better houses, better education, and better wages is paralysed ; the self-reliance which has enabled workmen to form unions and take independent action is relaxed, and depths of need are opened which no relief can fill. Out-relief is a sort of monster which destroys its own parent, the local rates from which it is drawn. The foundations on which Mr. Barnett based his actions relating to out-relief had to be firmly established to enable him to bear the unpopularity and misunderstanding which were the results. Some persons accusd him of sacrificing the people to his fads, others voted him a dreamer, while the poor who suffered by the change of pohcy bore him unstinted ill-will. All this he found very hard to bear, and yet in those early days he did not explain his motives and aims, either on the platform or by the Press. " Have you written all that ? " asked Dr. Ernest Hart after a conversation on Poor Law reform, and on receiving " No " as a reply, burst out with the rapid utterance of indignation at the folly of missing opportunities of sympathy and helpfulness by neglect of the Press. Even then, except for Parish Reports and for sermons, my husband did not use his pen, and it was left to me to lead the way in magazine literature by an article " Young Women in the Workhouse" in Macmillan in August 1879.^ It is fitting that that work should be mentioned here, for, though it was essentially woman's woi-k, it grew out of Mr. Barnett's position as Guardian. During his visits to " the House" and Infirmary, he saw young women in undesirable propinquity to vicious characters, some of whom were suffering from the consequences of their shameless lives. The existence of these girls was brutalising hj dreariness and made barren of effort by hopelessness. Helped hj the matron, Mrs. Mayor, who was always delighted to assist 1 Practicable Socialism, published by Messrs. Longmans, Green & Co. YOUNG WOMEN IN THE WORKHOUSE 209 the inmates, I began to visit them, first to gain their confid- ence and then to restart them in the difficult world, at least made easier to them by the possession of a friend who cared about what they did. At that time the Lock wards were underground, and no classification other than that demanded on medical grounds was attempted. Into these I plunged with the ignorance and enthusiasm of twenty-four years, dominated by the faith that no girls hked being wicked, that they had only adopted evil ways inadvertently or under compulsion, and that they would gladly suffer hardship and enjoj? disciphne so as to become good. Slowly I learnt the truth. I had arrived at woman's estate in a condition of almost incredible innocence, and sins, now known, alas ! to all plaj^goers and novel-readers of any age, were to me unimagined. To learn the facts of sex lawlessness through the channel of the rude words and impure minds of the women in the underground Look wards of the Whitechapel Infirmary made me ill, but I was absorbingly interested in the individual girls and never missed my weekly visit. For the first year or two the work was done without official recognition, but later Mr. Vallance, the Clerk to the Board, thought it desirable that the Guardians should know of it, and so records were rendered. The first one, March 1877,^ states that in the preceding twelve months eighty- one women and girls had been seen, and sixty placed out, of whom twelve were supporting their childi'en who were formerly on the rates. As I read the report of work long since forgotten I recall many of the Sarahs and the Margarets and the Kates, there denoted only by initials, and some of the events that those short official sentences cover. Drink has been this young woman's failing. She solemnly took the pledge and has kept it. And behind the words I can see Agnes G , aged twenty- six, in the rough workhouse uniform, kneehng in the httle dining-room at the Vicarage, and I can hear my husband's beautiful voice leading us in prayer. I remember her scribbled signature all blurred with her tears, and can feel her kiss of gratitude when, the httle ceremony ended, ■ I took her out to the hall, where sat the poor old pauper man sent to convoy her back to the workhouse. " Here ye be, my lassie," he said, anxious to comfort her, 1 Later it was agreed that the Reports should not be printed. 210 UNWANTED BABIES " it'll be all right now," and I recall my sense of indignation that such a dear old father-man, so ready with his sympathy, should be condemned to be cast away, out of sight and often out of mind, on the sad rubbish-heap of humanity. The babies were difficult joys, and often died in spite of all the care lavished on them by their foster-mothers, but the regular visiting which they necessitated gave us the privilege of knowing many noble women and their patient husbands, whose devotion to the care of nameless children was an object-lesson in Christian hfe, though usually Church-going was not their habit. Last night — February 20th, 1916 — I received a letter from a man in America who, after apologising for not -waiting for twenty years, sent word of his prosperity and the assurance of his grateful memory of all that had been done for him. He was one of those weakly unwanted babies, loved into hfe and self-respect by his foster-parents. And how that woman talked ! We used to fly from her, or take it in turns to bear the torrent of her words ; but hstening to her was the only renumeration she exacted; for, the baby's mother having returned to her evil ways, the nurse continued to keep him without payment, jealously guarding him against his mother, " who might harm him when in dxmk." Many people are the recipients of many sorts of love, but nothing can exceed the power and depth of the love which can be lavished by an unloved " incorrigible pauper." Ellen Mather was brought to me with that character, and her haK-closed eyes, sullen expression, set mouth, and general " don't-care " attitude brought despair into my heart. Nothing I said made any difference to her, she would not answer, probably thinking that as she had been to prison for workhouse insubordination, the future could hold no good for her. " It is my birthday on Tuesday," I said. No reply. " Don't you want to give me a present ? " Long silence and then — " I ain't got nothing to give nobody," was grunted out. " You have something you can give me which I want very much," I said. Silence. " Won't you give it me ? " Silence. Then curiosity awoke, and she sulkily asked, " What is it ? " " You can give me your promise that if I take you out of here, you ■will never enter the workhouse again.' Silence, AN "INCORRIGIBLE PAUPER" 211 this time unbroken until I had to go, but on Tuesday the eagerly looked-for letter was there, and the given promise was faithfuUy kept. I could write a book on Ellen, her experiences, her temper, her clumsiness, her sense of humour, her intelUgence, her incompetence, her scorn of most of her mistresses, ancl her appreciation of some, her shrewdness and stupidity, and through it all her great and permeating love. Every birthday I received a gift and a letter, and when once, presents having become too much the fashion, I decreed in an Eastern potentate style that I should refuse to receive them, I got ten shillings from EUen to help another girl. " I thought I'd make you take mine whosesoever you refused," she said, chorthng at having got the best of it. She was very naughty and very dear, learning hfe's lessons but slowly. When she was about thirty- five she went as under-servant to Mi-. F. C. Mills, one of the pre-Toynbee Hall settlers, who was then hving in Arbour Square, good Mrs. Batchelor being his housekeeper. While there, Ellen's con- sumptive tendency, which had been kept in abeyance by the aid of the Ventnor Hospital and much care, became active, and death was not far off. The outlook was difficult, for the promise about the workhouse had to be kept, ancl yet no hospital would take her. So the story was told to Mr. Mills, who at once accepted the burden and had the "incorrigible pauper" nursed in his house with every comfort until the end came. " What is that ? " I asked her one day, pointing to a beautiful Brett seascape standing on an easel at the bottom of the bed. " Mr. Mills brought it," she said. " He thought it would be company for me." "Nursed with every comfort" I have written, but such consideration was holier than any comfort ! If the girls left the infirmary and flung themselves back into their ungodly hves, I went after them, to woo them to take the hard self-restraining path which leads to righteous- ness. Sometimes they would refuse, sometimes respond, and occasionally tell me of some other girl perhaps younger or less hardened " who had better go along with you, ma'am." To each was given something difficult to do in evidence of the reahty of the desire to reform, for to make the way easy and attractive is not to call forth the characteristics on which alone reformation can be built. 212 THE WOMAN WHO WAS A SINNER " You must go into the infirmary first, then I will help you," was the decision given to one girl who, dirty, hatless, and almost shoeless, was hving in one of the furnished rooms or " dossing with her pals." " Come this evening, when it shall be all arranged." The evening went by, and bedtime came, but no Sehna. "She won't come now," said my husband; "you must give her up and go to rest." " I shall sit up for her ; she must not come and find the fights out," was my reply. He was vexed with me, for I was weak, too weak to sit hour after hour in the fittle draughty passage-hall waiting, hoping, fearing — fearing that the condition had been too stiff — fearing I had erred in not taking her myseK — fearing that opportunity of sin had come, and that her repentance was too weak to resist it. The people surged up and down the street shouting drunken songs, quarreUing, laughing, screaming, making hideous human noises provoca- tive to hopelessness. At last the knocker gave the single rap, which is what the poor give, and Sehna was won, stronger for ever by her conquest and the knowledge that someone cared whom she must not disappoint. For nine years I did this work, at first alone, then Lady Monteagle, Mi's. John Rodger, and Mrs. Frederick Greene joined me ; we formed the inevitable Committee, and the plan was extended to the St. George's-in-the-East and other Unions. It was painful work, for, to quote from the article already referred to : There are many failures : women whose resolution deserts them before the old temptations, whose promises are as lightly broken as they are earnestly made ; girls whose ill companions olfer them bright if lawless lives, and who leave the new hard ways for the weU-kno^vn aimless, care- less life. » But in spite of many failures, the work is hopefully continued in the belief, founded on experience, that the idle can be induced to work and learn through daily labour the gospel which work teaches ; that the eoarse- minded can yet see the beauty of holiness if it is shown greatly and plainly ; that the ignorant can j'et be taught, if patience be given ; that the careless may yet be circumspect if cared for. Failures and disappomtments are mevitable when the aim is not to make a temporary improvement, but to raise the ideas and radically change the habits of a class to help whom there has hitherto been so little effort made. And through all the labour, the disappointments, and the successes, my husband stood by, ready to help, to condole, or to congratulate. His subtle sympathy, his unerring dis- COMMERCIALISED VICE 213 cernment, his unfathomable hope, his extensive experience, his unlimited resourcefulness were all brought into use for the service of those who were striving to regenerate " the woman who was a sinner." His view of the subject shall he told in his own words in an article he wrote on " Com- merciahsed Vice." 1912. — What, then, may it be asked, is the action of the Christian towards her ? If, I suppose, you try to put into a sentence the change brought by Christ into human relations, you might saj' that from Him dates a new value in human beings. They who really see Jesus, cannot help but respect Him, and they who see His likeness in the despised, cannot help but respect them. Christ inspired not just kindness, or interest, or toleration, but respect for every human soul as something of incomparable, inestimable value. He Himself was courteous to the outcast and the child. . . The attitude, therefore, of the Christian towards the woman who is a sinner should be one of respect. She must be treated not as an inferior with lower needs, not by methods of exclusion as if she were imworthy of our comtesy, nor by excuses as if she were incapable of knowing better ; she must be helped not by the cold machinery of an organisation dealing with a fallen class, nor by the sentiment which makes light of her sin. She must be regarded as a human being in whom is Christ, with a divine capacity for being good, generous, loving, and therefore also with the noble human capacity for repentance. She must receive a respect which will remind her of her inheritance, and a warmth of human feeling which she will recognise as coming not from pity but from hope. Repression and sentiment alike have failed. Respect such as that shown by our Lord in Simon's house to the " woman who was a sinner " has yet to be tried. How this sense of respect will afiect the words and acts of individuals must be left to each other's conscience. CHAPTER XVIII " The Holy Spirit and the world spirit alike breathe in the spirit of the times." We were not always at work. Neither did our life consist of creating organisations for the benefit of the poor, nor fighting abuses which hindered their growth. We dehber- ately decided it should not be so, and thus kept times for each other, dined out frequently, paid many visits, and took splendid hohdays. Mr. Barnett wrote to his brother of some of these visits : Hampstead, March 1884. — We are spending our Sabbath with these soldiers of the nineteenth century. That is what the Miss Davenport Hills are, obedient servants of the will of the age. They are not poets to see the future nor leaders like Moses who go on Pisgah, but they are doers of the hard dull duty which a hard dull age imposes. It is good to be with them, to feel around one the breath of truth, the breezes of duty. Kensington, May 29th, 1886. — Here I am with the Potters by myself. My wife and I had both promised to spend our Sabbath here, but she was thed, so I came alone. I have had as pleasant a time as is possible when there is less than half myself to enjoy it. Last night Miss Chamberlain dined here, a frank, clever girl, devoted to her father and keen for his honour. Evidently she feels strongly against Gladstone and Morley, but the Bill will pass. . . March 28th, 1896. — Yesterday we went to stay vith Mr. and Mrs. Watts at their country house near Guildford. We found them established on a hillside amid the fir trees with peeps towards Hindhead. Their house just teems with art and ideas. The ceiling is worked in. plaster, each panel sjrmboUcal of some religion — the walls varied with oak and drapery, pictiues, chairs, everything is suggestive. He and she were, as ever, humble, inspired, and devoted. We talked and were refreshed to return to Whiteohapel to find our pictures in the picture-rooms and 214 WEEK-END VISITS 215 our duties waiting. A fine collection — Burne-Jones in great force. I have been trying to describe him for the catalogue, but have not got my hand or heart in. September 1th, 1907. — Here we are in a great rich house. . . Our hostess is a sweet person whose conscience is always troubling her about her wealth. She comes to us with cases ten times a day. . . Last night there was a dinner party of neighbours. Oh ! it is fun to note the horror of Sociahsm and their absolute ignorance of everything except horses and sport. Their cry is the commg ruin of the country. I attacked them for want of patriotism. It is really the worst sort of treason which cries out and retreats. My husband no longer rode, but I often went with my brother-in-law, and as from Wimpole Street the country to the north was the most accessible, I learnt well its rural beauties. The immediate result was that we rented a cottage in Palmer's Green to rest in, and the ultimate result was the creation of the Hampstead Garden Suburb. Every Friday we set aside for a tete-a-tete workless " Sabbath," taking long walks through Surrey or Kent, or seeing picture- galleries in town. These were days of great gladness to us and rarely sacrificed on duty altars. Dining out was also often a pleasure, but it had to be limited, for locomotion thirty to forty years ago was expensive and tiring, but one had to go to the West End to remind it of the East End. 1884. — ^We have dined out twice this week but with no par- ticular pleasure. One lady boasted of being an anarchist. How people use anything for excitement ! There is no sin so often committed as that of taking the Sacrament unworthily. Eternities are dressed up for the banquet of an hour. Crime, I expect, is a Sacrament — a kind of Sacrifice Avith Calvary behind — and so crime should not be talked of lightly, lest the Sacra- ment be taken unworthily. 1886. — On Tuesday evening we dined with the Toynbees ; I talked to Baden Powell about India, and enjoyed a chat with Miss Swan wick, who is one of the rare old ladies who keep youth and age together. Afterwards we went on to the Stebbings' and met, as Du Maurier said, "A lot of mind." We did not meet new people as we knew so many old friends. These parties seem weary waste of time, but they do serve to keep friends in touch. 1886. — Wednesday I had a heavy day and bore it easily, ending it up with a talk on " Charity," and later a ball at Knowles'. A tent was put up in the garden, and the garden lighted with Chinese lanterns. The sight was pretty, suggestive 216 DINNER PARTIES of the theatre rather than of Hfe, helpful to the fancy rather than to the imagination. The contemplation of West London was instructive. On Friday we went out to a big West London " At Home ' ' and both felt its waste and unreality. What a maze the threads of life are in — from one point of view such meetings have their use, but from another they seem nothing but false. I don't wonder at Ben Tillett's attacks, but I wish he would not. The habit of meeting extravagance with extravagance has been in vain tried. We must not feel less, but he must speak less. 1885. — Last night we dined at the . They are awfully and terribly rich. The table was supposed to be a work of art by which coarseness was hidden by flowers. At such dinners, where one sitfe with hosts one has known for many years, one understands why charities lack supi^ort. The money has gone into show which is approved because it is elegant. The dinner was not interesting . . . and doesn't bear thought. It was ^vrong, a wasteful use of time, money, brain-tissue, and possi- bilities of heart-work. Protest, protest against such extrava- gance and shams. . . We then drove to the " Inventories." The place was filled with folk in full dress, the lights were bril- liant, and the fountains played their tune in colom% ending by a note which seemed to take its rise m the stars. It made a fairy sight — fairy, not heavenly, because it was wanting in repose. 1889. — On Wednesday evenmg we dined M-ith the Bradleys and enjoyed the high-bred Christianity of the English gentle- Our own dinner parties were always interesting, and the Vicarage dining-room witnessed some daring social blending of East and West. Mr. Jowett, James RusseU Lowell, Henry Ward, H. M. Stanley, Rev. Mark Wilkes, Walter Besant, Mr. Asquith, Dr. Abbott, the Duke of Devonshire, Tom Mann, Herbert Spencer, William Morris, Ernest Hart, Ben Tillett, Lady Battersea, John Burns, Lord Goschen, Frederick Rogers, Lord Bryce, Octavia HiU, Emma Cons, and my sister made some interesting combinations and produced live talk. 1884. — On Monday we had a dirmer party when East and West met. Monteagle came in the evening, having heard Glad- stone's speech which much depressed him. The evening was hot and I was glad when they all went. The women were a better lot than the men. "AT HOME" TO OUR FRIENDS 217 May 28th, 1886. — On Tuesday we had a pleasant dinner, when my wife drew a brilHant conversation about Homo Rule from Corrie Grant and C'ostelloe. I enjoyed a fresh young girl whom 1 was allowed to have instead of a dignified dowager. 3Iay 21th, 1896. — We have had two dinner jDarties. At one we had Cook, Verney, Gorst. There was no specially interest- ing talk, though Gorst did say a few things born of disappoint- ment at the Cabinet Council. At the other we had Spender, Costelloe, Sidney Lee, and Crackanthorpe. Mrs. Crackanthorpe is a very clever woman, able to dare and to express her darings. She is emancipated and has not made herself a slave to new- ness. The talk was interesting on Manning. His ambition and double-dealing were allowed. But was he anxious in directing the publication of his letters to put on the white sheet, or was he to the end all unconscious of the wrong he was doing ? Of one dinner Mrs. Hill and Miss Octavia both wrote : 1874. — 'Mt. and Mrs. Tom Hughes sent Ockey a pressing invitation, but the Barnetts won. . . She had a very interesting time. 1888. — I dined at the Barnetts' last night, met Dr. Bridges (the Comtist), the Rev. Dr. Abbott, Mr. and Mrs. Courtney, etc. Mr. Bamett is trjring to get four acres of land, which is full of lodging-houses. . . It was great fun " hosting " so various an assortment of friends and my husband did it well, drawing out the charac- teristics of individuals to produce either sympathy or argu- ment. We dared to give only simple, not to say frugal fare, so that none should be emljarrassed. On every Monday evening and Wednesday afternoon we were " At Home " to all sorts of folk, and many, very many people came. 1880. — Yesterday we had a great press of visitors. My poor little woman was hemmed in on all sides, and everyone wanted to talk to her. People come more on Wednesday afternoons than on Monday evenings. I am sorry, as I can be at home on Mondays and not on Wednesdays. 1384. — ^\Vednesda'y my wife was ill, so I entertained her visitors. Men turned up from Oxford who were anxious to hear of work. They are good fellows, but what a lot they will learn ! Monday we had a dinner party and some forty folk came during the evening ; Oxford men again rather invaded us. 1—16 218 MR. W. MORRIS DECORATES ST. JUDE'S Of one of the Monday evenings Miss Harriett Harrison wrote : 1884. — Dear Mks. Baenett, — What a wonderful party ! Even that there could be such a thing and that it was a reality, is enough to make one a proud woman for having seen the immensity of the family we all belong to. It was like Botticelli's picture of the Nativity come true, with the pilgrims bemg received at the door by angels with palms, and a loving kiss-like greeting, with a sort of mixed-up merry-go-round of the angels above. Do you remember the picture in the National Gallery ? And the " mixed-up- merry- go- round angels " were all yoked to St. Jude's omnibus, to do or get done something for the public weal. In the St. Jude's Report Mr. Barnett wrote : 1879. — There is room for every character and occupation for every power. There is no one who can be in the way who brings the will to be helpful. He who has learnt in an office some business knowledge, he who from books and men has learnt the secret of art and culture, as well as he who having learnt of God knows the depth of man's being, may find their places. All can bring a life with the interests which surround it, and it is the life Avhich will teach the people. . . All can do such a simple thing as make friends. I only ask that such friend-making may be done in faith that it is one means of reaching the deepest needs. . . Of what some of the friends did I wiU now tell, beginning with Mr. WiUiam Morris, whose powers served our people. His colour-scheme for the Church lies before me : East End : ajjple green stencilled in darker shade ; curtains red and gold ; pillars scarlet ; dado for aisle walls of stronger tone ; walls above stone ; apple green around clerestory windows ; abolish cornfield and hedge frieze. It sounds gaudy, but it was not so when carried out, and on the scarlet pillars and the organ screen we placed fine photographs of Itahan and Spanish masterpieces. Above the string course were hung, in the earher years, enormous drawings of angels lent by Mr. HoUday, and later — 1889 — four of Mr. Watts's pictures.' The description of one of these is here given ^ : "The Messenqek of Death" The man lying dying on his chair represents the heir to the treasures and experiences of the ages. Around him are the emblems of his knowledge 1 Three of these are now in the hall of the Institute, Hampstead Garden Suburb, and one, " The Good Samaritan," I have lent to my friends the Bev. Sidney and Mrs. Vatoher, for St. Philip's, Stepney — the London Hosj>ital Church. " The Record, by Mrs. S. A. Barnett. PICTURES AND STATUARY IN CHURCH 219 and of his attainments: a written book, a read book, a violin, a globe, a maDet, and a palette, emblematic respectively of history, literature, music, astronomy, handicraft, and art. In the distance faintly delineated are a pyramid, a Greek temple, and a Christian cupola, symbolising some of the great religions in the world. The heir to Nature's conquests and man's triumphs is dying. The great God's sexless Messenger is touching his hand in summons. The background behind him is brown, the brown of the earth ; the background behind the Messenger is blue, the blue of the heavens; and " So much larger is the world behind the veil, that, great as is the man here, he will be but as the little embryo babe carried in the Messenger's arms, when he has passed from brown to blue." These were the artist's words as he told me the meaning of his picture. For the east end over the altar Mr. Wilson and Mr. Page of the Slade School depicted, on a background of gold, eight noble heads of men " di'yine by grace, human by grief." " Whose are the heads ? " Mrs. Butcher was asked. She was the dear old pensioner who sat in the Church during the houi-s it was open for " those who care to think or pray in quietness." " No one ever told me, sir," she said, " but I think they must be meant for the seven Churches of Asia ayid St. Jude's." On the pictures in Church Mr. Barnett set a high value : 1879. — The unconscious influence of pictures in a place of worship is not to be despised. In days when we cannot boast that we have found in words a means of worship or rehgious teaching, it may be well to trust somewhat to those influences which will develop rather than provide thought and suggest rather than define God. In his letter to his brother he forges one of those hnks between his family and his work which increased his care for both. The Chm'ch decoration is effective, and the gildmg which is done out of the father's gold is a lesson of brightness. , . The Vicar had confidently surrendered the Church and its management into the hands of an elected Church Council, and his faith in democratic government was justi- fied when it permitted such innovations as statuary in Church, and accepted Mr. Roscoe MuUins's loan of his great statue of Isaac and Esau. Strangely through its silence it spoke of the despair of the disinherited — a fit emblem of the dumb pain of East London. Mr. Barnett wrote : 1875. — The great want of this East End of London is beauty ; the streets are ugly, and few signs of taste are anywhere apparent ; it is therefore well that it should be possible for both 220 THE DOULTON DRINKING-FODTSITAIN inhabitants and passers-by to enter a building which, by its grace and beauty, should remind them of a world made beautiful by God's Hand. 1885. — With the help of a neighbour who sells flowers in the streets, we have now fresh plants in the Church every Sunday. He is glad of the place in which they may live during that day, and we are glad of the help they give us in our worship. . . On Simday we had a big congregation and a Church decorated with 104 arum lilies. On weekdays as well as Sundays the Church was rarely empty of flowers, which were arranged, not in conventional ecclesiastical patterns, but freely as they grew. Usually we received thanks, but sometimes surprised remon- strance ; as for instance when I banked the altar with furze bushes, which the docile Vicar had cut and carried home from a Surrey common ; or when the great sprays of wild roses or honeysuckle were allowed to toss out their beauty in their lawful lawlessness. Many foolish and cruel things were said about Barnett's work — wrote the Rev. the Hon. J. G. Adderley, in his Reminiscences, 1916 — and the very remembrance of them makes us see how much we have learnt since then. For instance, when a fountain was erected — outside the west wall of the Church — it was supposed to be "unspiritual " and people sneered at what they called " Christianity assisting at its own funeral." And yet the designing and erection of that fountain gave us great pleasure. The bright colour breaks the weary dullness of the street, as the rainbow colours break the desolation of a flooded world. Its cost, £46, was paid by my earnings, for I was writing a good deal at that time, and so gave to the " sad, bad, mad " ones of Whitechapel what knowledge of their pain had enabled me to gain. The illustration will show the words we chose, in the hope that some of those who stopped to drink would gi'ope after their meaning. Many who used our fountain were sorry specimens of the human family. The Ishmaels of civihsation, the do^vntrodden women, the haK-witted wanderer, the homeless " rotter," used the same cup as the mischievous splashing boys, or the thirsty country carter bringing in his load of hay for the market, still held in the open street. Sometimes the tramps would wash their clothes and utensils as well as their bodies. Once from his dressing-room window my husband — who always got up at 5.30 — saw a woman tramp undress her baby and THE SHOEBLACKS' HOTEL 221 bathe it tenderly in the Doulton basin. He slipped down- stairs, brought her in to breakfast, and called me to hear her tale, which was a rare one of undeserved misfortune. But it concluded with that tenderly given cold bath, for she was helped to rejoin her husband, and has made a home in Canada, cherishing gratitude, for fear that long years should slay it. But friends are the keynote of this chapter, and from them came the new organ, long waited for, but a beauty when it arrived, built by Messrs. Wilhs, under Mr. Heath- cote Statham's directions. By others Whitechapel was given further facihties for washing. 1874. — To the persistent exertions of the Rev. 11. M. Clifiord, a friend to all of us, the debt on the baths and wash-houses in Goulston Street has been paid ofi, and the buildings handed over to the Vestry. In those days the Committees of Boys' Homes obtained from the Home Office the right to hold shoeblacking stations in the London streets, to which the boys were sent, to return in the evening and state what they had earned. In the Mansell Street Home Mr. Barnett — most efficiently sup- ported by our dear friend Mr. Tourell, the superintendent — turned the Home into a seK-governing hotel, and by putting the stations up to auction arrived at their economic value to the boys. Thus there was no temptation to he about earnings, and independence was encouraged. The boys bought from the kitchen buffet such food as they fancied and could afford, and the rent of the stations enabled helpful influences such as a band, books, classes, camp holidays, and Sunday rambles to be provided. In short, " pianos, pictures, and parties " were once more used for the saving of souls. Ig74. — Aided by friends I have been enabled to give many boys another start in life. . . After some training — for discip- line and attendance at night school are conditions of residence — in the Shoeblacks Brigade, they have passed out into work either on land or sea. Helped by Mr. Ernest Hart and other friendly doctors, a Medical Club was formed, on a plan which was a forecast in principle of the present panel system : 1877. — By the payment of about one penny a week arrange- ments have been made by which anyone may obtain attend- 222 FLOWER SHOWS ance and medicine from any of the doctors living in the neigh- bourhood. This plan obviates the difficulty of providing dis- penser and medicines which hampers jDrovident dispensaries. . . We have had to deal with all those difficulties which surround an untried scheme, and some special difficulties which seem to mock our efforts. Some day success must come, the hospitals will recognise the mischief of their indiscriminate relief, and the poor will welcome the opportunity of being independent. It was the friends, also, who took small groups of children to ramble in the parks and to play on the Tower Wharf. To many these Saturday afternoons were a revelation, for the very ignorant rarely move beyond their own streets. Unaware of what to seek or in which direction to seek it, their powers of effort and imagination both fail. It was to our friends that our neighbours owed the sight of flowers, for then none were sold in the streets. Every week thousands of dainty bunches arrived at the Vicarage, and were taken by the lady rent-collectors to the healthy, and by the parish nurse to the sick. We also promoted every kind of Flower Show, from the exhibition of the poor sickly seedHngs reared by the children, to the gorgeous displays of hot-house plants lent by the Horticultural and Botanical Societies, or sent from the conservatories of the richest of East London's well-wishers. Whatever the form, the motive was always the same. 1874. — The Flower Show in the summer helped those who live in our terrible courts to know that there is One whose will is that beauty should cover the earth. In the years under review — 1873-80 — the intention was to induce people themselves to grow flowers. Seeds, plants, pots, and instructions were given, and a lively interest shown and encouraged. Mr. Leonard Montefiore, that man of rare gifts and fascinating personality, appeared every summer, as he said of himself, as a " hardy annual," and gave up weeks of the long vacation to visit the exhibitors, label the plants, invent the rules, and organise the important day. Then, amid the crowds of eager people, noisy children, discontented plant-owners, he kept the peace, and rained the sunshine of his happy laughter on all alike, Jew or Gentile, old or young. The Flower Shows brought — 1876. — Many expressions of gratification that those divided by their creeds had found so pleasant a bond of imion. REV. HARRY AND MRS. JONES 223 A few years later the flowers created another union between the Church, the Jews, and the Ragged School organisation in George Yard, but — the Vicar wrote — 1879. — The dissatisfaction expressed at the prize-giving, the discovery that notwithstanding many precautious much cheating existed, the sense that the spirit encouraged is not a good spirit, convince me that for us a Flower Show is not advisable. Some other plan of encouragmg the growth of flowers must be adopted. We discontinued the shows of home-grown flowers with much regret, for to some of the least controlled of the people the tending of plants had been an uphfting influence, but the extraordinary ingenuity of those who had cheated — and they were not few — to try to obtain prizes, and the anger and suspicion aroused in the virtuous, as well as the festering quarrels the subject produced, made the decision to abandon them necessary. Among the friends made in those days was Mr. Brooke Lambert, who had spent four years as Vicar of St. Mark's, Whitechapel, and was then Vicar of Tamworth. I am sorry to hear that Barnett means to marry before he goes to East London — wrote Mr. Lambert to Miss Octavia Hill. — The work is onerous and continuous, and a wife can only be an incumbrance. This letter amused Miss Octavia, who sent it to us. About a year after, during Mr. Barnett's severe illness, Mr. Lam- bert called ; and with his letter in my memory, I went into the dra-wing-room to receive him, pretending gauoherie. ' " Well, Missy," he said, " and who are you ? " ', " Please, sir," I said, dropping him a mocking curtsey, " I am the incumbrance." " God bless my soul, are you ? " he exclaimed in some confusion, and then we shook hands and became real friends until he left this earth on January 25th, 1901. He and my husband were united by many ties of intellectual sympathy and common Work, but the closest bond was Mr. Barnett's admiration for Mr. Lambert's character. Even when we seriously differed from him on matters connected with the Departmental Committee on Poor Law Children — 1896 — my husband's faith in him never faltered, and our triangular friendship survived the shock of opposing action. The Rector of St. George' s-in-the-East, Harry Jones, was also our very good friend ; large and hilarious, strong and pugihstic, rich and racy, he seemed an odd sort of exponent of the teaching of the meek Nazarene carpenter, untd you reached his generous heart where loyalty and truth dwelt 224 BISHOP ELLICOTT supreme. He keenly enjoyed giving large dinner parties, when Mrs. Jones and her dogs would welcome the guests amid her stiff old-world furniture. When dinner was announced, Mr. Harry Jones would seize his lady, and hastening to the top of the table would commence to say grace in stentorian tones, Mrs. Jones — at the end of the tail of couples — starthng us all by her unexpected " Amen " pronounced loudly in wifely chorus, sometimes even before she had left the drawing-room. It was very funny, and we both enjoyed watching for it and observing the shock it caused on the uninitiated. One of Mr. Jones's letters is characteristic of his boisterous, whimsical, tender nature. Rectory, St. Geobge-in-the-East, E., May 20th, 1879. My dear Barnett, — Sympathy is sweet. I go mourning all ye day long ; the odour of your words is grateful to my soul. . . There are some bits of standing ground, and thank God there is a pathetically grotesque side to many of our situations and disappointments. The perverse way in which ye tenderest efforts are sometimes twisted into channels of crooked impulse is perhaps most sickening, as when ye people " cheated " at your Flower Show. . . Much, however, depends on ye way we look at things. I recall ye view of consolation taken by a sick soldier through whose hospital ye Duke of Cambridge walked. He was shortly afterwards found bubbling over with gratification. " Something pleased you, Tom, eh ? " says a visitor. " Yes, sir, the Dook ; he have been by, and he was so kind. He spoke to me, sir ; oh, he was so kind." " And what did he say, Tom ? " " Why, sir, he stopped, and he looked at me and said, ' Is that you, Tom, you blackguard ? I thought you had gone to the devil long ago.' " Our united kiad regards to your good wife. Ever, thine sincerely, Harry Jones. With Bishop EUicott our relationship began with a comic incident, for, with aU his learning and refinement, he looked shrivelled and unkempt. Old Nurse, who opened the door to him and who had an experienced horror of the pretenders who stole coats, did not approve of his appearance nor of that of his strange bag, and so, refusing to admit him, advised him to walk up and down the street tiU the Vicar came, adding : " You will recognise him if you know him, as you say you do," advice which he uncomplainingly followed. It was our friends, too, who gladdened our holidays. We always started alone and for two or three weeks revelled in our recurrent honeymoons. Then we were often joined either by old friends or men whom Mr. Barnett wanted to see quietly. To the party a few girls were added, who found a young and most indulgent chaperon. Cornwall, DECISION TO WINTER IN EGYPT 225 the Channel Isles, the Yorkshire Moors, and South Wales are beautiful backgrounds for good talk, and when into hohday relationships are brought such people as Arnold Toynbee and his wife, C. Harrison Townsend, Sir Gregory and Lady Foster, Graham Wallas, Ernest Hart, Rev. Ronald Bayne, Octavia Hill, Dr. Gregory, and B. P. C. CosteUoe, interesting conversation must ensue, specially when guided by the subtle sympathy and fearless brain of my husband. We often prepared a menu of conversation and commandeered the memory-stores of the party. My husband was very fond of reading aloud, which he did well. To him it made no difference whether the book was in English or French, for if in the latter he translated it so rapidly that the reading proceeded uninterruptedly. I remember Miss Octavia refusing to beUeve that he was not reading English, and those long books of George Sand, Balzac, and Dumas, as well as Browning, Robertson, and Matthew Arnold, are interwoven in my mind with his voice, and the sea, and rocks, and cornfields of Georgeham, Newlyn, Pendine, at all of which places we took hohdays, Mr. Barnett earning the rent of the Vicarages which we filled with guests . In March 1879 I was very iU, and came quite close to the Great Gates. A long trying summer spent in Whitechapel left results which made it desirable to spend the next winter in the sunshine. We therefore decided to go to Egypt ; Mr. Brooke Lambert making it possible by generously under- taking to Uve in the httle Vicarage and serve the parish. Mr. Barnett wrote to his parishioners on our proposed absence : 1880. — Even though had there been no ill-health to force us away, I am inclined to think that after seven years' Hfe ia the East End a long spell amid other scenes is desirable on every ground. I have often told you how I believe that the Gospel of the higher life is not to be conveyed in any set phrase or by any one means. It now reaches men through the thousand influences of literature, art, society, which have been touched by the spirit of Christ. A man must, it seems to me, go to the people of the East End not as to heathens, not as to people morally worse than the rich, but as to those who are out of reach of many influences powerful to make life fuller and higher. He can only meet their real needs by making himself the channel of such influences by keeping his own mind open and his own hopes firm. He must refresh himself with new scenes so that he may realise the needs which exist around his home, so that he may gather thoughts to spend on others, so that he may obtain strength to work where he will see no result of his labour. CHAPTER XIX EGYPT " Each nation grows in strength as it enters more deeply into the life of other nations^ We were away from home for six months, and during that time Mr. Barnett wrote seventy-five long letters to his mother. They are all written in his small clear handwriting, and usually occupy eight sheets of large-sized foreign-letter paper. They are rich in suggestive thought, and perhaps some day it would be well to pubhsh them for the use of travellers to the Nile ; but for this book a few selections only can be given. Our party included JVIiss Kate Potter, her sister Margaret, and Mr. Herbert Spencer. The two latter joined us in Cairo, but Kate, my husband, and I started from Liverpool, the only passengers in one of Mr. Holt's ships, and had a slow restful sea-jom-ney. Mr. Barnett's first impression of the East are expressed vividly : Poet Said, November 2\st, 1879. — ^\Vhen we dropped our anchor, a scene opened of which one has often dreamt. Boats hke bees swarmed romid the ship. Bum-boats loaded with beads, corals, and bright things to attract sailors; official boats with officials of small stature and large personality ; business boats with business men busy with their own importance ; coaling boats loaded with tall dark figures looking like shades crossing the Styx ; boats for hire "with Arab boys tempting pas- sengers with broken English. Each boat roused a new interest, and the time fled as we watched things strange and new. It is worth a sea- journey thus to enter a new port to feel how by a sudden spring one's mind is enlarged. The Agent came on board full of anxiety to be friendly. . . His well-appointed four-oared boat with sailors in English cos- tume bore us ashore and he set himseK to be our guide. We were on Egj^ptian land, a wretched spit on which no house would have stood except for the canal. Wooden shanties have been run up in rows ; there is no road, but passengers walk on the sand between the shanties. The place suggests one of the towns 226 FIEST IMPEESSIONS OF THE EAST 227 around gold diggings, or one of the annexes wliich surrounded the Great Exhibition. The shanties, which are open in front, show all kinds of goods, and on the sand paths one meets men of all nations. The Arabs were to us the most interesting, but it was amusing to see a fat Frenchman on a very small donkey, just keeping his heels above the ground, and protecting himself from the sun by an umbrella. The Arabs moved about with dignity, looking, even when poor and ill-treated, most like the masters of the land. The Sheiks wore gorgeous clothing, silk surplices of many colours. The poor had scanty clothing which showed their long bare legs, but not one had the wretchedness which belongs in England to clothing as scanty. The women show only their eyes, a narrow cloth hung on a bit of wire is fastened over their noses, and hangs to their waist; their eyes thus shine out very bril- liantly, and perhaps the charms thus half-revealed are most attractive. The sad sight was the prevalence of ophthalmia, and blindness, due to the flies, and the want of water. We went direct to Cairo and stayed in the Hotel du Nil. We were delighted to find that our hotel is in the old thoroughfare down a narrow passage, and in the centre of Arab life. Once inside we were even more delighted. The house is built around a garden, where palms with hanging clusters of dates, and trees laden with oranges, wave above roses, banana trees, flowers and shrubs unseen at home save in hot-houses. Over this garden our room looks, and I am writing this at the open window, through which amid the palm branches the moon- light streams. Of some of the wonders of that semi- Eastern town Mr. Barnett's letters speak. They aU begin " My dearest Mother," so those words need not be repeated. Hotel du Nil, November 2Sth, 1879. — Riding on donkeys we went to the Mosque of the Dancing Dervishes. The place was desolate and looked hke Hengler's Circus after a year's disuse. In the arena were eight or ten figures with conical hats, stiff petticoats like pleated note-paper, and bare feet. They stood motionless, barbaric music sounded, and then the figures com- menced to whirl like teetotums. Their eyes were closed, their arms extended, and their motion regular as a machine. From one point of view the performance was ridiculous, but from an- other it was solemn. These men were utterly impassive, and it seemed as if their aim was to get rid of the upstart self which is so often impertinent before God. We get rid, or ought to get rid, of the same self ia devotion to others' needs ; in as far as we fail we must respect those who ia their way succeed. We heard that these men sometimes work themselves into a 228 A READER IN THE MOSQUE state of frenzy and are hardly restrained from killing themselves with cuts and blows. They, that is to say, lose themselves, and feel their bodies as foreign substances with which they have nothing to do. Caibo, November 30th, 1879. — Yesterday we rode to the Tombs of the Princes, a poor sight of French gilding and trumpery hangings, but a ride through strange surroundings. Across deep sand, under high walls on which the sun struck without a shadow, we passed, and everywhere stood unguarded tombs. Here death seemed to have no sadness but only desolation. I beheve that Abraham bought a field, a piece of brighter ground, because he could not put his dead in such unloving surroundings. It is enough that life's walk should be so often through garish day ; death wants softness and colour, and suggestions of hght greater than that of the sun. In the mosque a crowd of men and women — about fifty — had gathered, squatting around a man who was reading the law. He was a chance-comer, unpaid, who was thus teaching his fellows. As he ended, all quietly got up, and each one went forward in turn to kiss his hand in token of thanks. So I sup- pose did Christ enter the synagogues and read to the people. Such simple forms are very beautiful. One curses the law which forces the sacrifice of so much that is good in the old to make way for the new. I expect it is the flaw in our civihsation. To obtain use, we have given up beautif3dng as our ancestors did, and we scorn as " barbaric " achievements out of our power. The West needs to hear every day the text, " He that believeth shall not make haste." Who knows in this old country, where beauty is still as much thought of as use, where they still use a bow for a turning lathe, Avhere they blow a smith's fire with a rush fan, and eat vegetables instead of meat, there may not be more progress ? They have been passed by Persians, Greeks, and Romans, and the race has not yet been to the swift. . . Before we left England it had not been planned that Mr. Spencer should be included in our party, but after we had started Mr. and Mrs. Potter suggested that as he was much out of health he should take their younger daughter Margaret, and join us for the Nile journey, in the hope that it would do him good. We were somewhat dismayed to have so celebrated a personage, and one we had only met once, added to our trio, but it evidently never occurred to Mr. Spencer that he might not be welcome, and so there was nothing else to do but to fall in with the plan. My husband thought he might be a real acquisition, all the more as one of the anticipated pleasures of the holiday was the opportunity of discussing subjects other than those OUR DAHABEEH THE " HEDWIG " 229 connected with social reform. After a few days' acquaint- ance he wrote : Hotel du Nil, Cairo, November 29th, 1879.— This morning I went for a walk with Herbert Spencer through Cairo. He is not the companion with whom to see such places. I am more conscious of him than of what is around. He is not the big man I expected, whose opinions, if distasteful, would yet have overwhelming force to keep a person like me in subjection. He is distinctly a little man, one to awaken neither reverence nor respect. He is small in character, which he shows by his suspicion of his fellows, his incapacity to trust anyone, and his constant consideration of himself and of all small things. He is small, too, in thought ; his vision is limited to see only what his theories allow him to see. He has no sense of the great- ness of the unknown, no modesty about his own knowledge. Pie has considered all things. He knows the past and the future ; and behold, Herbert Spencer is greater than either ! Otherwise he is not a bad companion. We had hardly been a week at Cairo when Mr. Barnett became ill with dysentery. Hotel du Nil, Caieo, December 8th, 1879. — It has been wretched to be seedy. The inner eye has blinded the outer. Cairo ceased to be beautiful, the composition of our party be- came unbearable. The streets became narrow, and we protested against the indolence which left them without stones or pitch- ing, mere dust passages, uncleansed and unswept. The people seemed dirty, and we forgot their picturesque costumes as we saw them catching fleas about their persons, and became con- scious of smells which suggested other abominations. The noise of the water-carriers jingling their cups or the outrunners warning the passengers wearied us, and we thought with envy of the quiet of Clifton under the newly organised police. Then the nights, which had seemed so marvellous in their starlit beauty, now became hideous with the cries of dervishes who would howl themselves into self-forgetfulness, of mourners who would wake the dead, of dogs who, leaving the tombs and hiding-places, fought with one another over the garbage of the streets, of cats meeting as they meet in England, to express in louder tones the sormds which admit of so many interpretations. My ■wife was made nervous by all these noises. Fimerals and horrors surrounded us, and she wished the dogs would eat the cats and die of indigestion. In Cairo we hired the " Hedwig," the largest dahabeeh we could find, a delightful old dragoman called AJi who was always gorgeously arrayed, and a troupe of twenty many- 230 MR. HERBERT SPENCER hued and blue-robed sailors and servants. After being ceremoniously welcomed by them aU, and having paid cor- responding courtesies, we started on Dec. 10th, 1879, to spend three months sailing with the wind against the stream, in the hope of gaining strength and reaching Wadi-Halfah. We sailed up the Nile rather more rapidly than is usual, for the wind was strong and persistent, and the weather being very cold made us unanimous in wishing to hasten south- ward. Every member of our party devoted much time and thought to I'lr. Spencer, and, shocking as it may appear to his disciples, it may be worth while to give Mr. Barnett's summing-up of his theories. December 2\st, 1879. — As you know, Herbert Spencer has a world-wide reputation and is looked up to by some clever people as their great light. I have not read his books., I found them alien and dull. Here is what I make of his philosophy from his talk. He applies the principle of DarA^in to social Ufe, and by examples from present primitive races shows how complex customs and institutions have been evolved. His greatest ex- ample is religion. "Savages," he says, "dream of their dead ancestors. These ancestors seem to them to be aUve, inhabit- ing the original seat of the race. They make offerings to these ancestors, the ancestors become to them gods, and hence the whole religious fabric." The ancestral ghost is thus the origin of rehgions. This principle he apphes about everything. Shak- ing hands is a compromise between two people, each one of whom would kiss the hand of the other. The force which makes customs to evolve is the working of seU-mterest. Such, very meagrely stated, seems to be his philosophy. Its effect on him is, first of all, to make him narrowly hard on all customs of primitive races. He dishkes their simplicity, their love of ornament, their want of ambition, because all are marks of the savage state. Secondly, it makes liim disbelieve in any other than a selfish motive, and excludes from life, imagination, poetry, and love. Everyone has rights and ought to insist on theh- recognition. Thirdly, it provides him with a theory into which he would force all evidence. Ho is strangely ignorant of history and literature ; so I should be shy of taking any of his facts. Hence his theory does not appeal to me. He has a great reputation. Sometimes I think it due to the happy accident that in a scientific age he has found a scientific formula to explain the mysteries of social life. The scientific men cro^vn him, the silly world worships him, just as in old times when a man discovered a pagan formula for Cliristian truths, the writers in love with Homer and Virgil crowned him and the world worshipped. THE PHILOSOPHER PERPLEXING 231 Of course this is only my view, a view of an ignorant person after a sliort experience. Such as it is, you will see how his presence affects us. First of all, he drives us into the conservative camp. We are led to take the conservative side, to defend the simple, luiambitious, improgressive life of the Arabs, and to protest in favour of the originality of the religious idea. Secondly, you will see, he is not interesting. There are few matters which he knows enough of, or is mterested enough in, to discuss. He likes gossip or chaff. Lastly, being suspicious and only satisfied when he discovers that others' interests coincide with his plea- sure, he jars on our anxiety to be happy. With all this he is courteous and anxious to please. W^e might have had many worse companions, and he causes many a laugh as he is " drawn " by the young women. Mr. Spencer was both a surprise and a puzzle to us. He enjoyed the society of ladies, though he was much vexed if he were suspected of so doing, and he would hsten with amusement to empty smoking-room conversation, but what really annoyed him was being asked questions by admirers of his books. He shied violently from young men who wanted his opinion, and refused to attend to any talk on debatable subjects. " Do you not think, sir ? " in a male voice drove him from the room, and I never remember his asking any one of the interesting and charming people we met on that journey, for information or experience, though they were often the experts on their own subjects. While we were in Cairo, the savants of every nation who were there sought to see Mr. Spencer, bringing him letters of introduction and making great efforts to suit his con- venience. To them all he was most distant and forbidding. One such visitor, a professor of world-wide reputation, came into the sitting-room evidently anticipating the privilege and pleasure of a conversation, but the gaunt philosopher received him standing, did not ask him to sit do^vn, and after an awful pause — for Mr. Spencer had the power of shrivelling people up — he said : " Monsieur, je n'aime pas les introductions qui ne viennent a rien. Bon jour." My hu.sband endeavoured to smooth the feehngs of the wounded admirer, but unavaihngly. The tombs and the temples, and our interest in them, vexed Mi. Spencer very much, and I find it chronicled in my diary that to please him the ever-unseliish Kate hurried us through the immortal tomb of Tii, the philosopher standing impatiently outside having announced that we had better come away, for " when anyone has seen the class 232 SAILING UP THE NILE of thing it was quite as efficacious, less fatiguing, and more convenient to study the facts from books and pictures." Of our first sight of the Nile I wrote : 1879. — At last we stood on the bank of the old Nile. A hundred thoughts and pictures of the lives, joys, pains of the multitudes who had lived by it, on it, for it, chased each other through our minds. We stood silenced by its historic beauty, till Mr. Spencer broke the pause with : " The colour of the water hardly vouches for its hygienic properties." " I think there should be some punishment for people who lead one to these places by false representations," he frequently said, and this indeed was his constant attitude of mind towards everything of fascinating beauty or interest on the Nile. Spencer tries to be nice, and he is always a " gentleman." Privately we call him a " mummy." That's just it, he has lived his hfe in a tomb, and having walked all round it and with some pains discovered its secrets, presumes to shout out to the world that he knows its secrets also. There's nothing hke personal contact with a philosopher for showing one the strength of one's opposition to his views. One runs from Spencer's arms to admire the Arab or the English peasant, who, though bar- barians to him, dimly feel an Unknown before which they bow. For those who are not prepared to find their pleasures in looking, reading, or sketching, a journey up the Nile by sail is often a mistake. It never bored Mr. Barnett, but Mr. Spencer found himself not only bored but irritated. Perhaps his annoyance was partly due to his inabihty to make the facts aromid him harmonise with his theories on Egypt. He would propound an hypothesis, and give in support of his view sundry bits of evidence which he had picked up from Ah or the guides. But his French was very imperfect, and we, thinking he was seeking truth, would tell him how he had misunderstood Ah's language or bring forth fresh facts which modified, if they did not contradict, his assertions. When, however, we found that these innocent and perfectly genuine efforts to assist him only made him angry,' we of course desisted, but the ehmination of so many subjects of conversation made entertaining him more difficult. We had with us a great box full of books chiefly on Egypt, though there were some on Turkey, Greece, and Italy as we had planned to return through Europe. On some days Mr. Barnett sat on deck for hours reading — often aloud ; at other times we took long excursions. 1 Huxley noted this same trait in Mr. Spencer's character, saying, " Tragedy for Spencer was a deduction killed by a fact." THE TOMBS OP THE KINGS 233 1879. — On Saturday morning the sun rose in his might, and at 8 o'clock we were all oli to the Tombs of the Kings. It was a three-hours ride. I like the physical pleasure of a good gallop on a willing donkey. I enjoyed the ride thi'ough the blazing barrenness of the valley. Gloom is so often associated with what is dark that it startles one to be in a scene when the very briUiance creates gloom. The rocks seem to mock the life- giving sun and to assert themselves as fit companions for the dead. We went into the tomb ; and felt our brains whirl as we saw the myriad figures of gods, men, and beasts. We could admire the bright colouring, the grace of the drawing, the tenderness of the feeling, but what does it mean ? Had these Egyptians a deep spiritual faith, a superstition, or a science ? One thing is clear, their prayer was that they might be calm and still ; their belief was that fife went on for ever. Perhaps underneath outward forms they saw those eternal forces which have been revealed more clearly in the life of Christ ; perhaps they saw in these outward forms footprints of old times which made them holy. We came from the tomb utterly dazed, but at the same time deeply conscious we had been amid things that speak. Every day brought its pleasures, its gift of beauty, glimpses into the lives of the people, and further under- standing of our crew, who under All's influence served us with efficiency and devotion. After the experience of the degradation of our Whitechapel neighbours, it was delightful to Uve in daily relationship with twenty men so industrious, frugal, self-respecting, and considerate. My husband's letters tell many tales about them, and though only one — — the house servant — talked English, we managed to obtain a considerable insight into their circumstances, thoughts, and hopes. The sailors squabbled as to who should accompany us on the long land excursions, a pure gift of service, as we never gave them tips, and they eagerly seized every occasion to amuse us. On hoard the " Hedwig," December 2lst, 1879. — Our serving-man we call Pharaoh, as that is our nearest approach to his Arab name. We feel as he waits on us that we take vengeance for the Israehtes. He is a good fellow who knows a httle Enghsh. He speaks of his " factory " for coffee, and of " young " bread. He has no sense of class difference, making certain relations impossible. Miss Potter's collar was not straight, and he put up his hand and smoothed it. Such equahty is remarkable, connected as it is with caste and despotism. . . This morning I heard him say to Spencer, " You wash to-day ? " meaning, were 1—17 234 THE ARAB CREW his clothes ready for the wash ? He talks about the backbone of a chicken as a " fowl's box." While my wife was ill he came to me and said he would get tilings all day long, and then when she came to breakfast and he stood behind her chair waving off the flies, he said at frequent intervals, "I'se glad you better." Did I tell you how she found a neat little gilt cross nailed above her bed ? Now, he said, she would " never be sick again." It was nice of him to use the Christian symbol. It showed hberaUty, though, as he told her, a bit of the Koran would be better. The " Hedwig," December 1879. — -These Arab sailors give us no end of interest. They are children with the dignity of gentle- men. If we look as if we wanted something, one rushes forward to get it. They do their work solemnly. When I go early on deck I see piles of what seems clothing about the deck. Silently obeying some instinct rather than an order, like flowers in a field, these heaps rise and, one after another, prove to be men and go about their work. After breakfast we wish them " Good morning," which causes a great sensation, they touch heads and hearts, smiling their joy. At stmset most of them pray. Facing the east, with a bit of carpet before them, they seem to be xmconscious of all things as they bow, kneel, and prostrate themselves. I expect the habit is very good. The mind has a way of keeping in tune with the body, and when the body is thus humbled the mind too becomes humble. With cuts and bruises they come to Y • for doctoring, and she, beheving only in cold water with a great appearance of bandaging, has been successful. The " Hedwig," December 29th, 1879. — My wife has painted the cook ! ! That's the greatest event since my last letter. He is such a cook ; his costume represents a survival of the unfittest. English boots whose rotten elastic sides reveal his bare feet, cahco drawers, an Enghsh shooting-coat over a sky-blue Arab waistcoat, all covered by a surtout which may have belonged to a Russian noble. His costume, his occupation, or his nature gives him a shrinking look. This morning he has been standing far from Y encouraged by her words "good cook" to abstain from sinking through the floor while she painted himj She has got something like him, at any rate when we look at the picture we shall think of fowls, pigeons, and onions. . . On Christmas Day we prepared a grand snapdragon for our crew. They had never seen such a sight. It was amusing. They cheered, and with every cheer in regular rhythm, they put their hands in the flames and pulled out raisins which they at once dropped. The object to them seemed to be to empty the tray. At last like the Chinaman and roast pig one sucked his fingers. Then all began to pick up those on the ground and to NEW YEAR'S DAY FANTASIA 235 say " good, good." I hope they won't think other things as good require tire, or we may be having a tlare-up. On New Year's Day we got up to find tho deck and the saloon decorated with pahn branches and hung with apples and oranges. A cake of fanciful structure and many sweet- meats adorned the table ; Ah was magnificently dressed and all the men wore bright clothes and glad faces. After breakfast we were summoned on deck by music and found Ismailla dressed up in an old Enghsh coat with a false beard and the skin of one of the consumed sheep converted into a head-dress of dignified appearance. Then a panto- mimic display was begun for our amusement. First he took off the bumptious Enghshman, self-assertive and important. Then the Enghsh sportsman, robust and merry. He was followed by a funny representation of the Enghsh fine lady mincing as she walked. Lastly, he mimicked the Turkish tax-collector sitting cross-legged with a long pipe. Before him all the crew was brought to pay their dues, the sad beautiful-faced Hassein pretending to read the amounts off an old envelope from Mr. Atkinson from St. Jude's. The Rais, refusing to pay, was bastinadoed amid shouts of laughter ; old AK paid up handsomely, the cook comically pleaded for time, the second Rais was dragged uproariously to prison, and all joined in the fun, the solemn Abdoor alone excepted. At last Mr. Barnett was summoned, but as he could not pantomime and as they were shy of asking him, he handed over his £1 without further ado, and the scene ended with the beard of the tax-gatherer going off in a flame, an Arab- Enghsh " Hurrah," and the holy communion of common laughter. And all this while our boat, her sail bellying out peacefully, pushed against the stream, with the deep blue sky above, and the red, blue, yellow, violet, maddening-coloured water below. The rest of our New Year's iJay was spent in the great temple of Karnak, of which Mr. Barnett' s letter to Miss Paterson gives some impression. LuxoB, January 2nd, 1880. — Mrs. Barnett wanted to write to you to-night, but I did not let her, and I know you would not wish her to do so. She has been out all day, sketching the temple of Karnak, with her mind alive to all its voices and wonders, and if she were to write to-night, I know she would not sleep. Meeting here other Enghsh, we find how fortunate we are in Ali, our crew and boat. In some boats there has been 236 THE TEMPLE OF KARNAK such rolling that pianos and old ladies have pursued one another across the cabin floors. We have never been more than six inches out of the level. 1 wish 1 could 1 2. ~0 (/) ^ " Vouchsafe, O Lord, to keep us this day with- <" 'n °ut sin. O Lord, have mercy upon us ; let Thy o" ^ mercy hghten upon us as our trust is in Thee." ,* £ i" = 1Rea6ing " Janet's repentance," ^ by " George Eliot." « ■D SacreD /IBusic . Violin and Organ ... | ^ pragcr . That we may feel sorrow at sin . . g « 2lntbcm50. " If with all your hearts ye truly seek Me." 2, « Elijah (Mendelssohn) o I DBmnlSS. " Sinful, sighing to be blest " . . I ^ to be sung by the congregation kneeling § c " IReaaing . " Desire," by Matthew Arnold . . " ~ Psalm li. g. I Solo " God, have mercy " St. Paul {Mendelssohn) E c p" xs " O God, have mercy upon me, and blot out my _ ^ transgressions, according to Thy loving kindness ; 2. yea, even for Thy mercy's sake, deny me not ; c "^ cast me not a"way from Thy presence, and take not " c Thy Spirit from me. Lord, a broken and contrite S- •- heart is offered before Thee. I will speak of Thy 5- salvation, I will teach transgressors, that all the g > simiers shall be converted unto Thee. Then open "* .c Thou my lips, O Lord, and my mouth shall show 3 — forth Thy glorious praise." 2. pause for silent Prayer o ■©gmn 224 " Sweet Saviour, bless us ere we go " Sntbcm "Comfort ye My people". Messiah (Handel) 3 asene&tctton "/ am a sinner, full of doubts and fears, Make me a thing of love and tears." H. Coleridge. a 1 The story was told and extracts read. 277 278 THE READINGS From the day the " Worship Hour " was started, until the day the services were abandoned, the whole of the work they entailed was given voluntarily. The choir and organist were unpaid, the professional singers sang without fees, the bell-ringer, the door-keepers, the organ-blower, one and all united in joyful co-operation. The result was the im- portation, into a corner of the EstabUshed Church, of some of that deep and noble spirit which has flourished most among the influences of the Free Churches. It will be seen from the order of service that the readmgs from the Bible and the modern writers express the same thought, that the sequence of the service leads from the idea in the first motto to that expressed at the bottom of the page, and that the words at the sides of the paper support the main theme. When the readings were difficult or likely to be of per- manent value, we printed them with easy explanations,, and before me now lie many dainty coloured leaflets — for colour was ever refreshing in drab East London — the subjects ranguig from Browning's Abt Vogler to simple poetry such as Bishop C. W. Stubbs's / sat alone with my Conscience. The two aisles of the Church were always kept dark, so that the saddest and dirtiest should not fear observation ; the chancel was brilliantly lighted and the font laden with flowers, which Miss Paterson and I gave to all who cared for them as they left the church. The clergy officiated unrobed. My husband rarely conducted the " Worship Hour," for after four services and a Sunday-school teachers' training- class, he was often unduly weary, but I sometimes permitted him to come in by the back way just to take the extempore prayer. Was it because he did it better than Mr. Boyle, or Air. Wragge, or Mr. Aitken ? No ! and yet they, as well as I, often begged him to come. Perhaps it was the humflity that unconsciously escaped from him that constrained us to pray. The following prayer was taken down in shorthand. How surprised and helped Canon Barnett would have been that anyone thought it worth while. The subject of the service had been " Growth from sorrow for sm to confidence in God in Christ Who can make us triumph over it " ; and the reading was from Kingsley's It is not the will of God and- Mazzini's Duties of Man. St. Jude's Church, Commercial Street, Whitechapel, after its renovation. 278] THE PRAYERS 279 1885. — God, in Whom we live and move and have our being, we are here to-night with a confession of failm-e and sin. It is Thy purpose that we should be strong and free. We confess that we have been weak and slavish. We have simied agauist Thee in thought, word, and deed. In our private life we have followed om- lower nature, yielded to base desires, failed in our endeavours after good. Because we have not trusted in Thee, therefore we have been base and indolent, thoughtless and mean, faithless and forgetful. In our public life we have sinned against Thee, we have shrunli from responsibility, from our duty to oirr brother man. We have preferred our own ease to doing justice. We have looked on at oppression, passed by on the other side, and given no help to misery. We have sinned agauist Thee in our national life. As a nation we are in trouble, poverty, want. It is because we have not trusted in Thee that we are in trouble. God, as a nation and as individuals, forgive us our negligences and ignorances, our levity and thoughtlessness. Give us time to tliink. Father, the giver of life and health and order. Who manifested Thy Son that He might destroy the works of the devil, order our unruly wills and fitful affections, give hf e to our failing aspirations ; strengthen us with Thy strength, purify us with Thy purity, make sin more imjDossible for us. Here followed a reference to the elections, and the aspira- tion was expressed that we might elect the pure man, the meek man, so as to give victory to love. As an example of the union of my husband's and my work, the following prayer has a double interest. It is in my handwriting, and kept as few such things were treasured, but whether I Avrote it for him to use, or from memory after the service was over, it is not possible to say. Holy Father, we know we are not worthy to come to Thee. With the people we meet, we do not half what we might. We neither act, speak, think, feel, nor pray as we should do. Amid our repentance it comes to us that Thou hast called Thyself Our Father and said that we are Thy children, inheritors of all that is holy and eternal. Holy Father, in the search for principles, help us to see and hold on to some of Thy eternal truths, and to shape our life on them. Help us to teach that, and that only, which is true to us. Forbid that we should teach in words what our Uves contradict ; forbid that we blaspheme in dehvering Thy great message. Father, we long to teach, and our gratitude makes our hearts leap in determination to declare that God He is Lord. . . Bum out all that is wrong. Crush out all that hinders us. 280 THE WORSHIPPERS Awaken our souls till they shrink at the approach of sin. Create in us a fierce hatred of the false, and let us be Thy children, Thy pure messengers, fit to serve Thee, and worthy to render Thee thanks for Thy great mercy to us. In the name of Christ. Amen. Of the effect of the service after it had been established seven years Mr. Barnett wrote : 1888. — The changes which mean growth in righteousness can- not be marked. All that can be done is continually to examine how the means provided — the forms of worship — may best help the man of the nineteenth century. The old forms are helpful, they are loaded with memories, they seem in some way to express the many moods of mind through which we have passed, to be at once the fullest expression of what is inexpressible, and to be the link which binds us to those who are separated from us by time or character. The worshippers who feel the charm of the old forms have need to remind themselves that their feeling is not shared by the majority. The demand of the time is for accurate expression, for change upon change, and men are too hurried to look for a meaning which is not on the surface. Scholars and artisans do not therefore, as a rule, use the old forms of worship, and it is for us to find other means by which they may be helped. Worship in which they may themselves take part — prayers in the language of daOy life and weighted with the thoughts of the day — music to express aspiration or sorrow not to be put into words — lessons from those scriptures which the Holy Spirit has never ceased to write for our learning, these arc the means by which men of the nineteenth century may be helped to bind their failure with God's success, their weakness with His strength, and these are the means we have tried in our Worship Hour. That service is now seven years old, it is evidently valued, and it is hard not to believe that some in that silent crowd of those who listen and pray have found themselves in that Presence where they may learn to be good and find peace for their souls. When I had to be away, from ill-health, Mr. Barnett always wrote to me about the " Worship Hour." 1886. — Your Worship Hour service was very nice and well attended. Levitus sings well and caught the people. . . Miss Beavis' singers were strong and Statham was delighted with the anthem. Boyle read beautifully. Rabbi Ben Ezra always carries the whole lot along. . . Everything went well and everyone did his duty. One solo from The Elijah was very fine, lifting me right out of myself. The people listened intently. OPINIONS OF OTHERS . 281 May 4th, 1889. — At the evening service my sermon went better, but the congregation was unusually poor. At your service the congregation was better and the choir singing was good. Rossetti, Clough, and Carlyle made the readings. Whitechapel, January 1st, 1883. — The day is over, your service was good and well- attended. Whitechapel did it all. Miss Hale sang, our choir chorussed, and Fred Rogers " chucked- in." . . . I have seen and talked to many people. It is slow work to build up a spiritual house " one by one." It is no wonder that you want to do it to the sound of perfect music. Whichever way it is done, the model of Solomon is good, that the house should grow in silence. The following extracts will show what three other men thought of the Worship Hour. Canon Horsley wrote : St. Michael's Clergy House, Finsbuhy. My dbab Sm, — Permit me, though a stranger to you, to bear my testi- Diony to the value of the work that was being carried on in your church last night. I knew notliing of it till I was attracted like other passers-by by the open doors, but once entered the sight was very striking. I was in a position where I could observe all the congregation, and I was most pleased and edified by the reverential demeanour of all. The men, as far as I could count, exceeded the women in the proportion of three to one, and were chiefly of the costermonger and low labouring class. But observ- ing them not only in their seats but as they went out one by one, no one could fail to observe the air of solemnity and decorum with which they behaved. Such a work is one from which visible results are least likely to be traced, but I am sure that the majority would have gone away much mfluenced for good. May you find it to have been so. I am, yours faithfully, J. W. Hoesley. One who had often officiated at the services and who knew the people well reported : 1891. — The inner life can be stirred. , . A few simple words, a well- known hymn, the sight of flowers, the sound of music, above all the solemn prayer, draw the soul into the eyes of men and women in whom the life of the lodging-house and the street would seem to have killed down all capacity for deeper feeling. . . At the Worship Hour, instead of choosing a text only for the sermon, a text is chosen for the whole service, and thus prayers and hymns, solos and reacUng, fall into their natural place, and feeling and intellect are together called into play to drive home the truth, now of God's greatness, now of Christ's love, now of the place which faith, or hope, or prayer, or forgiveness plays in the Christian life. . . It is encouraging to hear from one and another, and especially from some who have left East London to work in other parts of England, how real has been 1—20 282 HYMNS RATIONAL AND REVERENT the help which they have found in the stern struggle of life from coming Sunday by Sunday to the Worship Hour at St. Jude's. The following is from a man who did much to make the services what they were, but who prefers to be anonymous : 1902. — One of the congregation, speaking of the help the service had been to him, said, much as he appreciated the readings and the music, there was nothing equal to the time of silent prayer. When the people had been solemnised by music, Mr. Barnett would say, " While the church is silent, let us draw near to God in prayer," and in the silence that followed " souls became still enough to hear God speak." At the close of the period for silence the Vicar gathered up the aspirations and petitions by reciting the Lord's Prayer, in which by his emphasis on one clause or another he brought out the intention of the service. It was a very great pleasure to me to prepare the services, to select the governing thought, find suggestive mottoes, choose the readings, and invite the singers. Mr. H. Heath- cote Statham gave generous help in all that concerned the music. Sometimes he added severe criticism, but he had a high standard, and our deathless principle of " the best for the lowest " demanded fhie music. When Mr. Boyle jomed St. Jude's in 1885 his well-furnished brain enlarged my literary horizon, and a book which he kept, numbering no fewer than 334 pages, on each of which is the record of a separate service, makes interesting readmg. It was essential for the " Worship Hour " that hymns should be both rational and reverent, but no such collection seemed to exist, until Miss Townsend made one and presented it in manuscript to Mr. Barnett — following her Cliristmas gift to him by a birthday gift to me of 500 copies subscribed by many friends. 1886. — The new hymn-book ref)resents the thought of one friend whose sympathy has been proved through many years, and the publication represents the generous good-will of many friends. The very presence of the books in the pews is thus an evidence of the Unseen Sjairit of Love wliich broods over all, and the book contains words which must be helpful to those who would think as well as sing. The words of hymns are answerable for many of the misconceptions which lie at the root both of superstition and infidelity. For the sake of tune, false sentiment and morbid fancy have been allowed a place in worsliip. It is no light gain that St. Jude's has now a book of poems which the thinker may study and which all may sing with understanding. ST. JUDE-ON-THE-HILL 283 After Mr. Barnett became Canon of Bristol — 1893 — and the Rev. Ronald Bayne Vicar of St. Jude's, the " Worship Hour " still continued, Miss Paterson and Mr. Bartholomew giving the time its preparation entailed ; but as the suc- ceedmg incumbent, the Rev. E. C. Carter, did not recognise the value of the service, its standard dropped and the large and earnest congregation gradually faded away. But the seed of the idea took root both in the provinces and in America, and we have learnt from many correspondents of helpful services started on the lines of the St. Jude's Worship Hour. It was only last night, March 8th, 1916, that the Vicar of St. Jude-on-the-HiU, Hampstead Garden Suburb, the Rev. B. G. Bourchier, announced that after a year spent with His Majesty's Forces teaching eternal verities to men facing the perils of war, he felt convinced not only that the Church must become more "simple in its worship and real in its devotion," but also that some of the " great thoughts which had been accorded by God to His present-day servants " should be used in the services. He had decided therefore, with the Bishop's consent, to say Evensong in the afternoon, and to start on Sunday evenings a service which he intended to conduct on the same lines as those of our old Whitecliapel Worship Hour. Thus the new St. Jude's, called after the old one, will walk thirty-five years afterwards along the same path, even though her footsteps will be of different shapes, for it is one of the advantages of such a service that it enables individu- ality to have play and gives to those who have been so happy as to find Almighty Power, the opportunity of pointing out the path. CHAPTER XXIII " A mind is kept clean not by being swept and garnished, but by being kept full of thoughts about things which are lovely, virtuous, and of good report. It would not be waste of their school life, if children accumulated fewer facts, and, instead, learnt the secret of admiration, and found in themselves the way of enjoyment." Edttoation occupied much of JVIi-. Barnett's thoughts, and one of his first actions — 1873 — at St. Jude's was to open the schools in the ill-designed derelict buildings. One of the then young teachers has described it : The school was no better and not much worse than most Church schools of that time. Small rooms, each containing a whole department, and one tiny dark cloak-room, and the smell in there was simply horrible ! One inadequate door and one narrow staircase, from top to bottom of the building, did duty for admittance and exit both for girls and boys and infants. . . Close to the school was the Vicarage, an oasis in the desert. At the end of the small hall was a tiny sanctum where it was always Sunday — to me at any rate. The house was backed by filthj', festering courts and aUej's, and the houses in them were indescribably wretched. I know, because it was the custom to send the pupil teachers every Monday dinner-time to beat up the morning's absentees from lessons. . . The schools were gradually transformed. We began with soap, towels, and looking-glasses (unheard-of luxury) for the cloak-room ; bunches of flowers were distributed to all the children through the summer months, and by degrees all sorts of nice things were added. Our schools wore started with boys and girls together, because the Vicar held that : 1874. — A fruitful cause of evil in the present day is the inferior education of women. When girls are taught with boys, they will learn much from which they are shut out in " girls' " schools; they will learn also to respect themselves ; the boys, too, meeting girls as equals and competitors, will cease to scorn and tease them, while they will themselves learn to be more quiet and gentle. It must be some time, though, before such schools become popular. 2Si CO-OPERATION OP PARENTS 285 So far from becoming " popular," the next year co- education had to be abandoned, for the girls objected, and their parents for them, to the roughness of the boys, and the size of the small yard which did duty as a play-ground made wholesome recreation impossible. But even in such build- ings my husband had high ideals : 1877. — If the Church is to act its part in making the schools of the future, it must now show that the children under its care are not only instructed, but also well cultured and imbued with the spirit of generosity and self-sacrifice. Ours must be the first school in the neighbourhood, and every detail of the manage- ment must show signs of thoughtful care. 1878. — Children should be educated, by their surroimdings in the schoolroom, to recognise beauty and to love order ; educated by intercourse with many minds to find interest elsewhere than in exciting scenes and vulgar talk ; educated, to be religious in the sense which unplies submission to the righteous God and respect for their fellow-men. In 1876 the schoolrooms were decorated by using Mr. Walter Crane's coloured illustrations of ^sop's Fables as a dado. This would not be worth mentioning had it not brought us the friendship of Mr. Walter Crane and been the means of starting the Art for Schools Association, whose work has adorned many schoolrooms and raised the standard of pictures provided for the unconscious education of pliant minds. Forty years ago, be it remembered, school walls were left bare for fear that the children should be distracted from their lessons, the only decorations being maps and charts of animals, where the duck was depicted as big as the elephant, and the colour of all was a universal grey. The co-operation of parents Mr . Barnett felt to be essential ; so to arouse their interest, they were invited to breakmg-up parties, when little shows of work were arranged and the children entertained their elders. Meetings were also held between the parents and school managers to evoke mutual understanding. 1879. — The meetings give us the opportunity of pressing upon the parents our plans of educating their children, our efforts to teach them method, to cultivate their intelUgence, and develop their reverence. 1888. — The parents' Conference ought to make the teachers' work ^deeper. It is part of an efiort to consoUdate all the work 286 HANDICRAFTS TAUGHT and the interests connected with the schools, so that parents and teachers, clergy and children, visitors and voluntary teachers, may know themselves as members of one another. It was these parents' meetings which enabled the govern- ment of the school to become more democratic. 1888. — The cost of such schools as ours is large, and this year the repair of the drains amounted to over £50. It occurred to us that it might be well if we took the parents into counsel as to the amount of fee which should be charged. A conference of fathers was summoned, and it Avas pleasant to hear the approval expressed of our methods. After a long talk, it was agreed that every parent should be left to fix the fee he thought he ought to pay. Papers were sent round, and four assessed themselves at 6d., fourteen at id., and forty at 3rf. a week, instead of the old 2d. fee. If this plan be persistently pursued, it may be that the deficiency of income will be met. 1888. — To F. G. B. — On Thursday we had a meeting of school parents whom we asked to elect two managers. Our mistake was in asking them to tea, or perhaps in asking the women. A good many of the baser sort came whose one idea is " getting," and their presence was not helpful. With the system of teaching then prevailing in elementary schools my husband was unreservedly dissatisfied. 1886. — The system by which children are every year crammed with facts they do not understand, and by which teachers are led to set more value on results measiwed by an Inspector than on the growth of the children's minds, is very unsatisfactory. The nation's future is founded on the national education, and such education hardly exists. The first thing essential in teach- ing is to interest the child's mind, to engage its attention so that its powers of observation, reasoning, and feeling may be developed. One of our plans is to introduce clay-modelhng and carpentering on two afternoons in each week. We beheve that as the children get interested in doing something, they may be trained to habits of method, induced to reason and even to invent. We believe, indeed, that the time spent in handicraft will better fit them for head work. Their minds during the time, being in a kind of mental gymnasium, will be stretched, become supple, and so they will be more inclined to ask the why and the wherefore. The cost of the experiment will be large, but such an experiment must be tried under the best conditions. Mr. Magnus,' Principal of the Guilds' Institute, is most kindly overlooking what is done. * Now SiriBhilip Magnus, M,P. GOVERNMENT GRANT REFUSED 287 The enthusiasm of the children and the teachers for the new classes was undoubted, but disappointment awaited them : 1887. — H.M. Inspector gave us the greatest blow : he came expecting to find exceptional intelligence, and inspected in a way which was in itself a lesson, but which was entirely unexpected by the teachers. The children did not do well, and then, to crown our troubles, the Department refused the grant because the introduction of technical subjects into the time-table had been illegal. Doubtless the children will do better, and the refusal of the Department will be got over, but meantime the school is a martyr to a sense of duty. The next year things looked brighter. 1888. — The schools have won from the Inspector a good report. They are, though, still far below the standard we aspire to reach, a standard much higher than that of the Board Schools. We believe that, even under the cruel oppression of the Code, it might be possible to make learning attractive, and to develop intelli- gence, and we are determined not to think of passing 100 per cent, if we can succeed in putting life into school work. . . New methods of teaching have been introduced into the lower standards of the boys, reading is taught without books, and the attempt is made to evolve rather than to impose a care for order. Special lessons are still given by voluntary teachers in such subjects as geography, physiology, and French, and the scripture lessons are taken by the clergy. Indeed it was the freedom to make experiments that was an important factor in my husband's decision to maintain Church schools on voluntary gifts, after the nation had assumed the responsibility of education. 1876. — The examination by outsiders, not Government officials, the intercourse which grows up between ourselves and the children's parents, the opportunities we have of teaching (Mrs. Barnett, my colleagues, or myself give a Bible or special subject lesson every day), are some of the ends for which I think it worth while to keep the school in our own hands, though I do so in no antagonism to the School Board. Neither did the many disappointments which marked nine years of work quench his ardour to base our schools on a system of co-operation — co-operation between managers, parents, and teachers, and co-operation between teachers 288 A PLAY-CLASS and children. The latter was obtained by enlisting their interest in their own education, and by giving them a certain amouiit of selection of their work. Behmd the plan lay the hope that they would learn to enjoy using their brains. 1885. — Our schools should be model schools, and by example point to the blot on national education. Acts of Parliament and certified teachers are not making the people intelligent, much less dutiful. . . There is something rotten in the system on which we are resting our national hope. St. Jude's Schools ought, at any rate, to be an experiment in another system. We might try the effect of releasing ourselves from the domination of the Code, and trust simply to intelligent teaching. . . We might give to children teaching which would interest them, tell them of history rather than make them learn dates, reveal to them the life of a country rather than teach them names of towns, and let them enjoy the thought of poetry rather than spell its long words. When there was no education, Church schools led the way till the nation followed ; now that there is bad education, it is for the Church schools again to lead. In the St. Jude's Report of 1886 Mr. Barnett speaks of our night schools at " which boys and girls, whose licence is their shame, are besieged by methods representing the ingenuity of patient love," and then tells of the starting of " what may be called a Play-class." 1886. — The children from homes in which there is no room to play, and whose play-ground is the streets, have few traditional games, and those few are noisy. They are ignorant of the pleasures to be found in quiet, in silence, and seH-imposed restraint. Play-classes have, therefore, been started from 5 o'clock to 7 o'clock. Parties of ladies and gentlemen come regularly to act as playmates, to suggest games, and to inspire, if not to dictate, order. Their duty is by no means easy. The tendency of the children to make a wild rush and to change the game every few minutes is difficult to check without the force which would destroy the charm of a play-hour. The playmates may think that, compared with the work of State schools, orphanages, leagues, etc., their efforts are contemptible, but without such "despised and rejected" efforts, other may be Everyone knows how, under Mrs. Humphry Ward's inspiriting energy, there now exists, in all parts of London, a great network of play-centres, with their troops of salaried and volunteer workers. EVENING CLASSES IN THE AFTERNOON 289 Of the other experiments, that of getting volunteer teachers for special subjects, which included physiology, geography, Shakespeare, history and literature, was perhaps the most fruitful ; for it not only resulted in the creation of friendship between the children and cultivated men and women, but in many walks to the Parks — always in small parties never exceeding twelve — excursions to picture galleries, and visits to the Zoo ; thus beginnmg — 1876 — a series of " pleasures with educational objects " which stUl grows, and grows to some purpose. As two little groups of hot happy East London children gathered round the tea-table in my garden on Saturday, July 9fch, 1916, their hands full of treasures — for they were a nature-study party — I contrasted them with gratitude with the thm faces, lawless ways, and animal habits that the same sort of small people would have shown in those early rambles forty years ago. But the pathos of town- homes for nature-lovers dwells m the hearts of even these well-behaved little mortals. " Please, ma'am, need we go home ? 'Tis the far-ofi I want to look at," was politely whispered to me, and the glories of the sunset over my great view made it hard to say, " I am afraid you must, dear, for it will be ten o'clock now before you reach Wappmg." Among the experiments tried was one of evening classes in the afternoon. At that time the rule was for children to leave school on their reaching thirteen years of age or passing the fourth standard. The girls refused to remain beyond the usual age, and yet careful mothers of the small tradesmen or upper mechanic classes did not wish their daughters to go to factories or take service while they were so young. The result was that they hung about at home " helping mother " in the morning, but idling for the rest of the day. For these girls my husband ^started afternoon continuation classes under the regulations for evening teaching. Miss Buss, of the North London Collegiate School, superintended them, and the teachers were both professional and volunteer. 1886. — If the plan is approved, our girls will have a great opportunity. They will be able to acquire the knowledge which will make them better able to enjoy both solitude and company, and they will be helped to preserve for the time of womanhood the habits of regularity which they have acquired in school. 290 TEACHING OF RELIGION To give reality to tlio religious teaching in the schools was of deep importance to Mr. Barnett. 1890. — The justification most often put forward for voluntary schools is that by their means religious education is secured. It is a claim to be urged with humility. Far be it from me to say that religious education is impossible in Board Schools. Wherever a teacher lives in the fear of God, there must be religious teaching in his school, and there are, I know, many such teachers in whose presence children learn to know of the God Whose Will must be done. At the same time, it is fair to say that in the Board system there is no care to appoint such teachers. In our school, while we strive to secure that children are instructed in the facts of Bible history, we aim also at gettmg them taught by those who themselves feel the nearness of God to their own history. For tills reason the teachers often meet to strengthen one another by common study of the Bible, and to get strength from God in the Holy Communion. Of these opportunities, one who was then teaching in St. Jude's wrote : I love to recall the " family prayers " held in the Vicarage every Monday morning before school began, for clergy and teachers ; and the practice also for these same workers to meet in the Church for Holy Communion after every school hoUday at 8.15 on the morning of reopening school. I often did not appreciate it then. I would now. After many years' experience of work begun with prayer, the Vicar wrote as f oUows : 1886. — The teachers have tried to carry through each term the spirit of the Holy Communion with which it began, they have tried to act as members of a greater whole, and to consider the children as individuals born of God. To the actual teaching of the Bible he devoted much attention, himself giving the lesson four mornings in every week, to the teachers as well as to the children, but of religious examination he was critical : 1878. — I am sure an examination of rehgious knowledge is unhealthy, and I am not convinced that an examination of subjects connected with rehgion is good. . . The visit of the Inspector, though, tends to give a certain order and importance to work which otherwise might seem to deserve less attention. THE SPLENDID STAFF 291 One lady, now holding a responsible position under the London County Council, who was then a pupil teacher under the old system of joint training and teaching, wrote of his lessons on religion : It was our Vicar's broad grand way of reading the Bible that made us feel it to be true, and he taught us cleverly by asking for our ideas. How we strove to come up to the mark bj' giving thoughtful, and sometimes to us original ( ? ) answers ! I can see his face now all kindled up with affection- ate kindness, if we did say anything worth the breath spent upon it. Only once did we see him angry. One of us gave a foolish, thoughtless answer, and the Vicar burst out, " Oh ! you donkey, you donkey." We returned to work submissive and deeply chastened, because of so unusual an occur- rence. To think of it afterwards was to contract frost-bite on our imagination ! I delight in that donkey tale. I never liked my husband quite so much as when I had seen him angry. During the twenty-one years that he kept the school going there were often times of doubt and difficulty, both financial and otherwise, but the staff was splendid. Mr. Polyblank, who has already contributed to this book, left St. Mary's to help Mr. Barnett to start St. Jude's Schools, and he remained with us tni the end. Miss Thomas — a member of the house- hold of my gu'lhood's home — was trained as a teacher on purpose to come to East London with us ; and later Miss Jenkins and Miss Davies joined the staff. Of them my husband -wrote : 1888. — 1 have spent an hour in the schools. I believe my two women will vanish like Elijah in chariots of fire. Their sacrifice is unearthly, and I don't know how to make them take adequate pay or limit their work. That he had done something to promote their " un- earthly " attitude the following letter wUl show : December Mth, 1887. Deab Mb. Baknett, — I cannot let to-day pass without tellmg you how I thank you, not for your justice only, but for the calmness you instilled into me. Seeing you, and thinking how often I fail in my duty, I could not but realise that the best way to keep from failure was to help someone else, and I DOW feel that I can help Jessie as her friend to conquer her sullen- ness. I am more thankful than I can express that my three years' inter- course and friendship with you have helped me to come to this conclusion. If I had not seen true religion at St. Jude's now I believe these softened feelings would not have come. I have written to Jessie. 292 RELATIONS WITH SCHOOL BOARD Whatever happens, I am happy to-night, because with God's help and your example I am able now to feel, that though as Mistress I must, when necessary, insist on obedience, yet at the same time as her friend I can help her to do right. I remain, yours respectfully, A. B. C. And it was not only the heads of the departments who served with such inspiring sacrifice, the younger members of the staff shared their spirit, often refusing higher salaried posts to stay on in dear, dirty St. Jude's. In 1893, the year Mr. Barnett resigned the parish, he reported ; 1892. — More satisfactory even than a good report which we have gaiaed, was the pleasure expressed by the Inspector at the tone of the school and at the manners of the children. Indeed, no one can visit the departments without being struck by the open human look of the children and by the evident interest they take in their lessons. Mr. Barnett's relations with the School Board were always cordial. He canvassed to get Dr. Elizabeth Garrett [Anderson] on to the first School Board in 1870, and on the first Board school being opened in our parish — 1874 — he attended the function and gave it a sincere welcome. Both he and I became local managers, and it was the realisation of the limitation of their powers, in conjunction with the magnitude of their opportunities, that caused my husband to lead so persistent and determined a fight to obtain for them ofiicial permission to render efficient service. After the Local Managers' Association was formed, he wrote : 1883. — The result has been that both directly and indirectly the managers have more control over the schools. This must be good, if the managers use their powers well, and, by study, qualify themselves for their duties. An adequate system of local management would enable the Board to dispense with some of its officials — its inspectors of inspectors — to manage the schools on a more economical plan, and, above all, to keep up in the schools the sense of the personal supervision and interest of those living in the neighbourhood. The Managers' Association meets monthly under the chairmanship of Mr. Sydney Buxton ; it ought not only to protect the position of managers, but fit them to use their great powers in extending^and deepening Hhe education of the children. The story is too long and too technical to write, but the movement, under the devoted service of Mr. W. H. Pyddoke, has gathered both force and influence, and from the seed of DELIGHT IN CHILDREN 293 its labours can be traced the great tree of Care Committees with its many sheltering and sustaining branches. More than once in our long working life, wo have both been invited to stand for the School Board or the County Council, and at all times Mr. Barnett has been the friend of the officials and the candid critic of their work, employing either pen, platform, or pulpit to rebuke, stimulate, or insphe. In 1896, supported by Mi\ Kittle, he attacked the School Board for wastmg public money, and repeatedly protested against the multiplication of officials, the perfunctory nature of inspections, the limitations of teachers' traming, the inelasticity of the Code, and the large size of classes. He did not often wi-ite about children, whom he gaily loved, especially boys, but from Worship and Work these two extracts are taken : The bright spots in darkest London are the children. Their laiighter breaks in on the harsh notes of the street traffic, their freedom lifts for a moment the clouds of care from burdened brows. Their seriousness in play often opens to passers-by visions of a more satisfying pursuit than that of money or pleasure. Children are still images of the greatest in the kingdom of heaven ; they are still apostles of truth. Children have many God-given capacities, powers of doing, of thinking, and of loving. These, for earth's sake and for heaven's sake, must be drawn out. As gold lies hidden in the mine, so qualities lie hidden in the children. It is on working these qualities, on making the children all that is possible, that wealth and happiness depend. As soon as ToynbeeHalP was occupied, Mi-. Barnett formed the Education Reform League — 1884. In the early Toynbee Reports its programme is given : 1886. — The object of the Education Reform League is to enlist the co-operation of the working classes in the eifort to infuse more life into the dry bones of State-aided Elementary Education. Its aims include — 1. University education for teachers in primary schools. 2. Equal opportunities for all children to attain their highest 1 This is one of the instances referred to in the introductory chapter on The Plan of the Book. Although no mention has yet been made of Toynbee Hall, it is necessary to introduce it here, for in this chapter aU Canon Barnett's work in relation to elementary education is dealt with. 294 EDUCATION REFORM LEAGUE capability by continuity of training — technical, physical, and intellectual. 3. Improvements in the system of inspection. 4. The more general employment of school buildings and play- grounds for the people's benefit. The poHcy thus adumbrated is a wide one, and those who have set their hands to the plough are conscious that it will be a long and arduous task to give eif ect to any considerable portion of the desired reforms. They will be little likely to be attained until the parents are themselves educated to be in earnest to demand them. Mention will be made of the methods the Warden adopted to help Toynbee Hall to realise itself as a whole, and of these the Education Reform League was the most important. To consider its course of action, not only was every Resident invited, but he was asked to bring his friends among the artisans, tradesmen, and teachers, and thus a splendid body of working reformers were gathered together. The League had sub-committees in Stepney, Whitechapel, Mile End, Limehouse, Bow and Poplar, but its house of call was Toynbee Hall. Deeply interesting were the meetings, and apart from its work, it served, if I may so put it, as a class on education for University graduates, its teacher being the Warden. To it every new Resident came, and got some glimpses into this vast subject of national import- ance. It is not often that my husband allowed, even to himself, the credit of success. So the following extract from his paper in the University Review, published twenty-one years after the Education Reform League was established, may be pardoned : June 1905. — Twenty years ago primary education was much as it had been left by Mr. Lowe. Some University men living in a Settlement became conscious of the loss involved in the system, they talked with neighbours, who by themselves were uncon- scious of the loss, till inspired and inspiring they formed an Education Reform League. There were committees, meetings, and public addresses. The League was a small affair, and seemed to be little among the forces of the time. But every one of its proposals has been carried out. Some of its members in high official positions have wielded with effect the principles which were elaborated in the forge at which they and working men sweated together. Other of its members on local authorities or as citizens have never forgotten the inner meaning of education as they learnt it from their University friends. COMPULSORY CONTINUATION SCHOOLS 295 In pursuance of No. 2 of the aims of the Education Reform League, Canon Barnett demanded that — The children should be kept in school until the age of fifteen or sixteen, and maintenance he provided. A universal free education with necessary hoard need ho no more dogi'ading than is the provision of the scholarships now enjoyed by only a few.^ He also urged that — There should be a chain of continuation schools at which attendance should be compulsory up to the age of eighteen or nineteen. These schools would aim at the further development of the children's tastes as well as capacities, always remembering Lord Goschen's dictum that education should prepare people not only to earn a livelihood, but also to enjoy life.^ It would have been a joy to him to Vi^elcomo Mr. Fisher's Bill. One has to live in a densely populated neighbourhood to realise that holidays are certainly not happy daj'S nor holy- days. To remedy the evils of long summer days spent idly in crowded streets, my husband advocated the extension of the holiday months. In 1901 he vrrote to his brother : November 2,Qth, 1901 . — Yesterday I went to interview the School Board authorities about extension of holidays. It is quite reasonable but opposed to the interest of officials whom it would disturb. We shall see. But the realisation of his hope has not yet come. Nearly eleven years after that first interview he wrote : May 1912. — It is assumed that holidays must fall in the month of August. Now there are many parents whose occupation keeps them in town durmg that month, and who cannot therefore take their children to the country. August, too, is the period when all health resorts are most crowded and expensive. And lastly, if holidays are taken only in this autumn season the country of the spring and summer, with its haymaking, its flowers and its birds, remains unknown to the children. The obvious change — so obvious that one wonders why it has not long ago been adopted — is to let some schools take their holidays in the months of June and July. But I myself would suggest the best plan would be to keep all, or most, of the school in session during the whole summer, establishing for the three months a summer 1 The Daily News, January 21st, 1913. 296 NO HOLIDAYS curriculum, on the lines of those adopted in the Vacation Schools. The children would then be able to go with their friends, or through the Children's Country Holiday Fund for their country holiday, without any interference with the regular school regime ; and all, while they were at home, would have those resources in the school hours which have proved to be powerful to attract them from the streets. The teachers, free at last to take some of their hohdays in June or July, would be able to benefit by the lower charges, to get, perhaps, a recreative hohday in the Alps instead of one at the English seaside in the somewhat stale companionship of a party of fellow-teachers. The proposal to keep the schools in session during the whole summer was one which met with scant encourage- ment. The Press admitted Canon Barnett's articles, but they were usually followed by angry protests. Each year, however, ho repeated the proposal, arguing it not only for the children's sake, but from the point of view of the teachers and parents. In the meantime, Mrs. Humphry Ward had carried out her scheme of Vacation Schools, and in them there was always a splendid object-lesson. In The Daily Telegraph my husband wrote : July ISth, 1911. — During the three summer months the curri- culum might be like that of the Vacation Schools, in. which the children, hearing about natvire, paying visits to " sights," and vising their hands, find a new pleasure in school. The buildings — often the only pleasant space in a crowded neighbourhood — ■ would thus be in continuous use, while the children and teachers could get away for their country or foreign hohday without breaking into anj^ school routine. . . The teachers could have not four, but six weeks' vacation, in which there would be time for a foreign visit when the hotels were least crowded. The children, at the end of their fortnight in the country, would return, not just to loaf about the streets amid the dirt and the noise and the degrading temptation, but to take their places in the open and pleasant surroundings of the school, with its manifold interests. Among the advantages to be gained by the longer period available for holidays was that of school journeys, to the first of which Canon Barnett gave much help. Perhaps few early documents of movements can possess more interest than the first journey's Album, which showed not only most careful preparation of the district to be visited, geologically, geographically, historically, and botanically, but also the MONSTER DAY -TREATS CONDEMNED 297 art of stixnulatiiig intellectual curiosity by leaving much to be added by the boys' efforts. My husband also advocated the interchange of visits between English and foreign children, and urged that the advantages were not only those of learning each other's languages, but those of enlarged horizons and increased sympathy between nations. Side by side with these reforms, he waged continual war against the sin of prostitution of holidays, the monster day-treats falling specially under his clear-sighted con- demnation. At such treats the pleasure, such aa it is, is that which is given by drink. The children lose their self-control, they shout and scream, they quarrel and fight for the best places in the carriages, they ill-treat the donkeys, the frogs, and the crabs, and they return home dishevelled, cross, and ashamed. They do not by their day in the country accumulate memories which will draw them to a country life, and they do not get pleasures which will furnish their imagination with new scenes in which to act.i On the results of these " happy days " he was equally severe. Children's monster day-treats are, I believe, harmful charity. These " days in the country" do not, as their supporters imagine, promote either health or real enjoyment. The long day in the hot sun, the noisy journey, the unwholesome food of pies, cakes, ices, and sweets, the air laden with the breaths of a thousand children huddled together in the comer of a field or beach, the excitement of the day, and the prostration of weariness so affect health that many children are ill for two or three subsequent days, and all are made more liable to disease. The teachers of schools in this neighbourhood give a record of results which, if it could be realised by parents, would soOn put a stop to the practice.'' It was one of his gracious habits never to condemn without indicating a more excellent way, and therefore entwined in the condemnatory letters there were suggestions for various methods of helping children in small groups " to wander in the fields and woods, make friends with strange playfellows, ob- taui excitement by new revelations of country ways, dare the elements, and learn to understand the beasts." Every year the storm broke from aggrieved parsons, who asserted that ' The Church Times, July 31st, 1896. » The Times, July 1896, 1—21 298 FEEDING CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Mr. Barnett's letters prevented the opening of purses ; from sentimental journalists, or from people who can imagine nothing to be better than what is ; but he was supported by Mr. Brooke Lambert and a few others who really cared for child character, and so he continued to protest agamst monster day-treats to the end of his life. He also realised that the problem of fruitful holidays is not confined to the children in the elementary schools. At conferences and by articles he faced the difficulties in secondary and public schools, holding that the vacations were too long both for scholars and teachers. For the latter he advocated a closer adherence to duty with a year's vacation and a travelling scholarship every seven years. For the boys he hoped to see organised educational travel- ling, or camps with agricultural duties, a system which during the last few years has come to effective realisation under the able leadership of Mr. J. Howard Whitehouse, M.P. On the feeding of the children in the elementary schools my husband held strong opinions. In one of his articles, after summing up the disadvantages of giving dinners to selected children, he wrote : 1914. — May I submit a more excellent and a more simple way ? Let an ample breakfast of porridge, milk, and treacle — the food which experts declare and which experience has proved to be the best for children — be provided at 8 a.m. every morning in some central school hall, and let all children be free to come. There would be no need of investigation with its expense and its heart-burning. The meal could be served without making the school unfit for use, the children of careless parents who are now sent to school with a bit of dry bread or a penny with which to buy something, which is generally unwholesome, would get the early morning support for which their bodies crave, the children with good homes would not come, and on the mothers would remain the obligation of preparing some dinner. This obliga- tion is a tradition of family life, and many mothers who will not get up in the morning to give their children breakfast often do manage to give them a dinner. The obUgation would not be weakened by the provision of a milk breakfast, in the value of which the average mother would not believe. A further advantage of the breakfast system is that when children are found by the doctor to be underfed and have not come to the breakfast freely provided, there would be a ■prima facie case for charging the parents with neglect. The children TECHNICAL EDUCATION 299 might then, if it seemed advisable, be adopted and, either in this country or in the Colonies, be placed in a family where they would have — not just a meal a day — but the continual care they need. The public breakfast would, in a word, put within the reach of every child, without any loss of self-respect or any fear of re- proach from fellow-pupils, the nourishment necessary to enable him to learn his lessons and play his games. There would still be private funds which could provide dinners for exceptional cases ; but under a reformed poor-law when widows have their children boarded out to themselves and when seasons of un- employment are met with greater foresight, it may be hoped that such exceptional cases will be few. It has already been shown that St. Jude's schools lost then- grant in 1887 because of Mr. Barnett's desire to teach handi- craft, an incident which merely whetted his determination. In this matter he was not isolated, and the National Associa- tion for the Promotion of Technical Education was sup- ported by many leading brains. June nth, 1887. — Yesterday I went to a meeting at Devon- shire House about promoting technical education. Oh these houses ! there, within a stone's throw of crowded courts, was a park like a desert, a palace which was desolate. I was shown through pillared halls, up a sweeping marble staircase into a gilded silken room. The meeting contained Huxley, Roscoe, Lubbock, Samuelson, Playfair, and a half-dozen more well- known people under Lord Hartington. He is an honest piece of wood, too honest even to be humble, too wooden to take in any new idea. I saw why he is popular, he is what Englishmen used to think themselves. The meeting was strangely ineffective and made one feel that cabinets are no better than other committees. A small committee of five — none aristocrats — was appointed to do everything. Of this I am one. Many years after this meeting, when Lord Rosebery's persistency had achieved its object, he wrote one of his one- sentenced letters to my husband, whom he hailed as " the parent of this Charlottenburg." No mention has been made on his views on, or work for, the various Education BUls which were conceived, amended, rejected, or passed during the fifty years of his working life. The omission is made, partly because the subject is too technical to bo of general interest, and partly because merely 300 "EDUCATE, EDUCATE, EDUCATE" to record the facts of his work would take too much space. It was dull and laborious too at the time, aud would be duller and more laborious to read now that the interest of personal dealing has gone by. After we left Toynbee Hall in 1906 Canon Barnett had no executive relation with schools, but his interest was unabated and his pen very active. Indeed, the great amount of his output on educational matters is what necessitates this abridged summary of those labours. Many of his articles have been reprinted in the three volumes of Practicable Socialism (Longmans, Green & Co.) and Towards Social Reform (Fisher Unwin), while others were on current educa- tional topics, written always in the hope of awakening the public to care for the subject. As I re-read those articles, recall meetings, speeches, conferences, debates, I realise with gratitude how many of the early reforms Mr. Barnett demanded have been accomplished. But his ideals widened as his years increased, though they were all based on the words we had adopted as a guiding principle and often quoted to each other — " The best for the lowest." In the Toynbee Council Report the following words occured : 1892. — The past year has been signalised by the return in July of Mr. and Mrs. Barnett from their journey round the world, and the Warden sounded at once the dominant note of the impressions that he had gained in travel. " Educate, educate, educate, is the voice which the traveller hears as he travels round the world. The spirit of the age is too strong for the minds through which it has to work. . . All of us have our ideals, we dream of a perfect city, a perfect state, a perfect life. Whatever be those ideals, they are impossible until people have both knowledge and intelUgence, until by some means human character is raised to the level of that of the Son of Man. With all the energy roused by the sight of the world, and with all the love kindled by the return home, I would enlist old and new workers in the cause of education." That he held the end of education to be the fuller know- ledge of God is clearly put in an article written in 1907 : For thirty-four years my wife and I have been engaged in social experiments. Many ways have been tried, and always the recognised object has been the religion of the people — religion, that is, in the sense which I have defined as that faith ta the Highest which is the impulse of human progress, man's spur to loving action, man's rest in the midst of sorrow, man's hope in death. RELIGION ADVANCED BY EDUCATION 301 With the object of preparing the way to this reHgion, schools have been improved, houses have been built and oj)en spaces secured. Hobdays have been made more healthy, and the best in art has been made more common. But, viewing all these efforts of many reformers, I am prepared to say that the most pressing need is for higher education. . . There is no activity which more surely advances religion than the teaching which gives insight, far sight, and wide sight. The people, for want of religion, are unstable in their policy, joyless in their amusements, and uninspired by any sure and certain hope. They have not the sense of sin — in modern language, none of that consciousness of unreached ideals which makes men humble and earnest. They have not the grace of humility nor the force of a faith stronger than death. It may seem a far cry from a teacher's class-room to the peace and power of a Psahnist or of a St. Paul ; but,' as Archbishop Benson said, " Christ is a present Christ, and all of us are His contemporaries." And my own behef is that the eye opened by higher education is on the way to find in the present the form of the Christ Who will satisfy the human longing for the Higher-than-self. CHAPTER XXIV " The ideal leader of the day is a mystic who can be practical." Two years after our marriage we paid out fii'st visit together to Oxford, a visit never to be forgotten, not only for the great pleasure which it gave my husband to introduce me to his beloved University, but also for the many consequences that followed that spring visit. In our parish, we were confronted by some of the hardest problems of life. The housing of the people, the superfluity of unskilled labour, the enforcement of resented education, the liberty of the criminal classes to congregate and create a low public opinion, the administration of the Poor Law, the amusements of the ignorant, the hindrances to local government (in a neighbourhood devoid of the leisured and cultured), the difficulty of uniting the unskilled men and women in trade unions, the necessity for stricter Factory Acts, the joylessness of the masses, the hopelessness of the young — all represented difficult problems, each waiting for a solution and made more complicated by the apathy of the poor, who were content with an unrighteous contentment and patient with a godless patience. In those days these difficulties were being dealt with mainly by good women, generally elderly ; few men, with the exception of the clergy and noted philanthropists, as Lord Shaftesbury, were interested in the welfare of the poor, and economists rarely joined close experience with their theories. " If men, cultivated young thinking men, could only know of those things they would be altered," I used to say, with girlish faith in human goodness — a faith which years have not shaken ; and in the spring of 1875 we went to Oxford, partly to tell about the poor, partly to enjoy " Eights Week" with a group of young friends. Our party was planned by Miss Toynbee, whom I had met when at school, and whose brother Arnold was then an undergraduate at Pembroke. Our days were filled by the hos- pitality with which Oxford still rejoices its guests ; but in the evenings we used to drop quietly down the river with two or three earnest men, or sit long and late in our lodgings in the Turl, and discuss the mighty problems of poverty and the people. How vividly my husband and 1 can recall each and all of that first group of " thinlting men," so ready to take up enthusiasms in their bo3rish strength — Arnold Toynbee, Sidney Ball, W. [I. Forbes, Arthur Hoare, Leonard Montefiore, Alfred Milner, Phihp Gell, John Falk, G. E. Underbill, Ralph Whitehead, Lewis Nettleship ! Some of these are still here and caring for the people, but others have passed behind the veil, where perhaps earth's suffering are explicable.^ 1 "The Beginnings of ToynbeeHall," by Mrs. S. A. Bamett : Practicable Socialiam. 302 VISIT TO OXFORD 303 We used to ask each undergraduate as he developed interest to come and stay in Whitechapel, and see for himself. And they came, some to spend a few weeks, some for the Long Vacation, while others, as they left the University and began their life's work, took lodgings in East London, and felt all the fascination of its strong pulse of life, hearing, as those who listen always may, the hushed, unceasing moans underlying the cry which ever and anon makes itself heard by an unheeding public. What the friendship of that first group of undergraduate friends meant to us both it is impossible to exaggerate. They were "so young, so strong, so sure of God," and caring for us, they again and again swept us out of the darkness and pain of Whitechapel when it tlireatened to paralyse our powers, whUe we swept them out of the sunlight of the happier world, when it thi-eatened to blind them to the sins and sorrows of those who too silently suffered. Incidents of that first visit are still fresh in my memory, Grertrude Toynbee, so pretty in her white gowns and lUac ribbons, and alertly interested in all things "lovely and of good report " ; her sister Rachel, with her masses of black hair, provocative smiles, and wilful mischievous ways, so discomposing to her young chaperon ; her brother Arnold with his earnest eyes and strong face, eloquent silences, scorn of trivialities and passionate interest in war, its tactics and traditions ; Alfred MUner,' tall, dignified, and grave beyond his years, weighing evidence on every subject, anxious for the maintenance of absolute justice, eager to organise rather than to influence, and fearful to give generous impulses free rem; Arthur Hoare,' with his blue eyes, flaxen hair, laconic utterances, dogmatic certainty, and glorious capacity for unstinted service ; Lewis Nettleship, that dauntless brave soul with his shy manners, deceptive exterior, and jerky utterance, so great in his humility and humble in his greatness, asking questions which seemed almost foolish until replies had to be attempted — What could one say to such a query as " Why are the poor poor ? " but it left one thinking !— John Falk, glad, laughter-lovuig youth, eager for social schemes and ready to worship as heroes or heroines those who propounded them — I can see him now leap out of the boat into the river to fetch the rose that Rachel, now his wife, threw in and dared him to get out — A. L. Smith,' Fellow of Trinity, the almost unique figure 1 ViscountjMilner.JG.C.B., G.C.M.G., LL.D. ' House.Maater at Haileybury College, ' faster of Balliol. 304 INTRODUCTION TO MR. JOWETT in those days at Oxford of a learned man surrounded by children, joining his wife in tending them as she joined him in wider interests ; a man with a rare persistency of pene- trating spiritual vision, with humour to win the under- graduates and earnestness to hold them, with a humility that both retarded and exalted him, an inconsistency born of frequent additions to his information, and forgivable un- dependableness resulting from too many interests ; Leonard Montefiore, whose complicated character delighted while it mystified his friends, and indeed his brilliant intellect, his mad escapades, his passion for the beautiful, his devo- tion to children, his nonsense talk, his tenderness for the weak, his scorn for and acceptance of wealth, his dominant demand for social equality, made up a personality that was fascinating, lovable, and yet annoying ; W. H. Forbes, the tall spare diffident man, whose shyness hid both his learning and his public spirit, whose dainty tastes made him shrink from the degraded, whose sense of duty drove him to pay them many visits, and whose personal financial habits were parsimonious and public gifts munificent. We were all young together, Mr. Barnett being only seven years my senior, and I only two years older than the under- graduates, all young enough to face truth fearlessly and hold the social faith of the mountain-removing quality. From that visit in the " Eights Week " of 1875 date many visits to both the Universities. Rarely a term passed without our going to Oxford. Sometimes we stayed with Blr. Jowett, sometimes we were the guests of the undergraduates, who got up meetings in their rooms, and organised innumerable breakfasts, teas, river exovirsions, and other opportunities for introducing the duty of the cultured to the poor and degraded. Our introduction to the great Mr. Jowett lives in my memory. It was I think in 1 875, when our friends in Oxford had arranged a meeting in one of the Balliol common-rooms. During the day the numbers of those who were intending to come increased so largely that from Mr. A. L. Smith and Mr. T. W. Green and Mr. H. W. Forbes permission was obtained to use the haU. The Master was away, but the speeches had hardly begun when he unexpectedly returned, walked tlu'ough the crowd of boyish supporters, and sat down by the Chairman. Would he object ? Would he scatter their infant enthusiasm by a few incisive critical words ? Would he think that the duty of undergraduates was to study aiid not to consider social problems ? Would he .^:^^. f-t ■^ ,o ^i P5 ";£ < > ffi _ M M M S ^ s P ^ H <5 pel MEETING AT MERTON COLLEGE 305 be vexed at the use of the hall for a propagaDdist cause ? We felt like conspirators or children caught out in their naughtiness ; but after listening to the speeches, the Master rose and with a warmth that surprised even those who knew him best, supported our aims, touched on the need of im- proving the conditions of the people, and advised each of his listeners to " make some of his friends among the poor." When the meeting was over, Mr. Jowett invited us to drink coffee in the Lodge, and as we crossed the quad, I asked him a question, the audacity of which appals mo still, but which so delighted him that from that hour he gave me a deep and priceless friendship. As usually I went to Oxford with my husband, there are but few letters about his visits, but here is one: Mbbton Colleoh, Oxford, December 7th, 1881. I have looked at Jupiter, confided to the Warden my idea that you were looking at him too, but I did not get any sympathy from his bachelor heart,i and I am now sent to my room to prepare my speech. I can't do that better than by writing to you, loving you and thinking of you. So here goes. . . I found the Warden alone in a great house, with galleries, passages, and halls. I have two staircases to my room and everything else in proportion. Such a room, but without you it looks empty. We dined in Fall — a party of dull men sat round the table. I talked to the Warden on Church Reform and Egypt. He had met Spencer on his way home from Egypt. We retired after dimier to the common-room, a place to en- courage port -wane and ghost stories. Again talk was dull, marked with Oxford satisfaction, but without Oxford brilliancy. The Land Bill is condemned all round. At 7.30 we walked across the quad and here I am. Later the letter goes on in pencil : My speech is over. It was a bit too eloquent and had not quite the coolness of Oxford thought and language. However it went — though I had to look atTnotes. Brooke Lambert was diffuse and wanting in point. T. ¥/. Green's was halting, full of doubts with drops of real thought floating in its midst. It is a mistake at a public meeting to show all your mind and suggest vour doubts. T. C. Horsfall followed " rather " Kyrleish." Advocated Boards on which all are to unite. He wants us to go to Jlanchester on the 2nd. We will go if you like. I have said 1 This of course was chaff. He was never sentimental. 306 MR. ARNOLD TOYNBEE " I'll ask at home." You have to say. I do nothing you don't like. Stubbs is now going on. He is speaking like a scholar and a gentleman, but he has not " got " the men. He is too good style. We must all cultivate the fiarcourt style ! It is hard to judge of the meeting. There are about a hundred young fellows, inclined I should say to liberalism, possible curates. Later still : Alfred Robinson is now up and about to give his personal ex- periences. He is dull and very good. Now good night. I shall see soon what is to be done to-morrow. Married men get spoiled ; they get to think no one so good to talk to as their wives. From Oxford the men came to us, and we put them to such work as was possible during the vacations. Leonard Montefiore did the flower shows, B. P. C. Costelloe talked in men's clubs, Arthur Hoare boxed with boys, and all helped at the parish parties, or visited for the C.O.S. or the C.C.H.P. Arnold Toynbee stayed with us rather oftener than the other men, and once for a few weeks during the " Long " he took rooms over the C.O.S. office in Commercial Road, but his health was too fragile to bear the pain and strain of residence in East London, and the experiment soon ended. Usually he would persuade us to go away with him ; and the cliffs of Fanlight, the cornfields round Margate, and certain Surrey lanes still seem redolent of our talks. With him our friendship ever deepened and sweetened, and for him we had high hopes. His letter about his engagement is too beautiful and characteristic to be unshared : Oxford, December \st, 1878. My dbak Mes. Babnett, — Congratvilations are generally hollow enough, but yours had a reality about them that touched me. I did not mean to deceive you in my letter by that prose version of my love. Now I will be plain with you and hint a little of the poetry of my love. That silent, unnoticed little lady about whom you could learn nothing is the wisest and most lovable human being it has ever been my lot to know ; I love her with all mj' heart .and soul ; without her I know not how my life would end ; with her I know all will be well with me. May I thank you for your atlection to me ? I shall alwaj's strive to be worthy of it. 1 do not think 1 will say that you have too high expecta- tions of me — that would be treason to my love. Please give my love to your husband and tell him I thought his sermon the best I have ever heard from him. The man he asks about is a good fellow — not very clever or very well educated, and easily excited, but he UNDERGRADUATES VISIT WHITECHAPEL 307 has, I fancy, been thinking of these subjects for some time now, and counsel from your husband would be of great service to him. My reckoning has all gone wrong. Is it Wednesday the 11th or Thurs- day the 12th that I dine with you ? Will you let me have a postcard to make sure ? Please take care of yourself. Ever yours affectionately, A. Toynbeb. After their marriage we often stayed with them in their tiny damty home, and once they joined us in South Wales durmg one of our holidays, and we had a glorious time. Sadly short, however, was Arnold Toynbee's relations with East London, for he married early in 1879 — three years after his first visit to Whitechapel— and on March lOtli, 1883, left us all sadder by succumbing to the results of his efforts to give lectures in opposition to Henry George's Poverty and Progress, to unsympathetic audiences. It was in Oxford that his influence was chiefly felt, " where with his subtle force of personality he attracted orighaal or earnest mmds of all degrees, and turned their thoughts and faces towards the East End and its problems." Very varied were the men who came to us, but that spirit was the same — the spirit of learning not teaching, the spirit of comradeship not patronage. Indeed among the happy chaffing catchwords which spring up wherever young people get together, was one of warning often laughingly given, " You are not to do him good, you know." This may be misunderstood, so I will give some of my husband's words to his undergraduate friends. 1883. — Inquiries into social conditions lead generally to one conclusion. They show that little can be done jor, which is not done with the people. It is the poverty of their own life which mal?;es the poor content to inhabit " uninhabitable " houses, and content also to allow improved dwellings to become almost equally uninhabitable. It is the same poverty of life which makes so many careless of cleanliness, listless about the un- healthy condition of their workshops, and heedless of anything beyond the enjoyment of a moment's excitement. Such poverty of life can best be removed by contact with those who possess the means of higher life. Friendship is the channel by which the knowledge — the joys — the faith — the hope which belong to one class may pass to all classes. It is distance that makes friendship between classes almost impossible, and, therefore, residence among the poor is suggested as a simple way in which Oxford men may serve their generation. By sharing their fuller Uvea and riper thoughts with the poor they wUl 308 MR. SIDNEY BALL destroy the worst evil of poverty. They will also learn the thoiTght of the majority — the opinion of the English nation — and they will do something to weld Classes into Society. After they had graduated, some of the men who had visited us came to reside in East London. They lived together ui twos and threes in lodgings or in the model dwellings ; and under the sunny government of the Rev. T. G. Gardiner, who was then curate of St. Jude's, one group of five took a disused beer-shop in Leman Street, where they established a delightful bachelor household and termed it " The Friary." Often these men — among whom were Mr. B. F. C. Costelloe, Mr. James Bonar, the Rev. Charles Marson, Mr. Ronald Bayne, Mr. F. C. MUls, Mr. Dick Francis — went to Oxford to tell the undergraduates " that the wealth of England means only wealth in England," and that "the masses of the people live without knowledge, without hope, and often without health." Much fresh interest was awakened, and new recruits gathered round Arnold Toynbee, Mr. A. L. Smith, Mr. Phelps, Mr. Arthur Sidgwick, and the Rev. H. Scott Holland. But it was to Mr. Sidney Ball, whose alert mind, wide sympathies, powers of organisation, and fervent practical idealism made him then, as ever since, a strong force for progress, that my husband increasingly turned to intro- duce thoughtful men. It was his discernment which dis- covered powers in undergraduates worthy of being put to public uses. It was his energy that organised imiumerablo meetiiTigs, among them a memorable one at the Union when the abolition of the poor-law was debated, March 8th, 1877. And therefore it naturally followed that it was in his rooms that the meeting was held on November 17th, 1883, when Toynbee Hall was born. It was by his invitation thirty years afterwards, November 17th, 1913, that Oxford friends who mourned my husband, met and founded Barnett House, for the advancement " of economics and social studies," " of the work of University Settlements," and " of the higher education of the industrial classes." It is a worthy memorial, and the friendship which ir.spired it a sacred offering. In .June 1883 we were told by Mr. Moore Smith that some men at St. John's College, Cambridge, wished to serve the poor, but were not prepared to start an ordinary College Mission. Mr. Barnett was asked to suggest some more excellent way. The letter came as we were leaving for Oxford CANON SCOTT HOLLAND 309 and was slipped with others into my husband's pocket. Soon something went wrong with the engine and delayed the traia so long that the pas- sengers were allowed to get out. We seated ourselves on the railway bank, just then glorified by masses of ox-eye daisies, and there he wrote a letter suggesting that men might hire a house, where they could come for short or long periods, and,livmg in an industrial c[uarter, learn to "sup sorrow with the poor." ^ Just at this time public opinion was much stirred by the Avritings of Mr. Henry Greorge, a series of newspaper articles by G. R. Sims on " How the Poor Live," and a tract by Mr. Mearns called "The Bitter Cry of Outcast London." "It was then," said Mr. T. Hancock Nunn, " that those of us who had been stirred to shame and pity by these pictures of poverty, became aware of a gentle and a powerful spirit that came among us." Of the influence on Oxford of that " gentle and powerful spirit " who for eight years had been preaching " communion between the cultivated and ignorant" until he was laughingly called "the unpaid professor of social philosophy," Canon Scott Holland' wrote : Barnett came down and preached in our College Halls, and the whole University laid hold of his idea and understood. He came as a prophet just when it was wanted, and men saw in his Settlement proposal exactly the opportunity which their gathering interest in the problems of poverty demanded for its exercise and fulfilment. He surprised us by his quiet common sense. He had nothing about him that excited us. He some- times spoke with awe and bated breath about things that seemed to us commonplace enough. Once for instance in BaUiol Hall he had described to breathless undergraduates all that might be possible to them if they came to work for the poor m East London, and then he mentioned as a culmination to their dreams and aspirations that possibly at last they might become poor-law guardians ! There was rather a sudden fall ia the excitement for the moment, at this vision of the East End, but we saw gradually that this meant that you would have got to the very heart of things in a way that reaUy touched the Ufe and needs of the poor.' It is difficult, records Mr. Alfred Spender,* after thirty years to realise the shock of novelty with which revelations of the condition of the poor came to comfortable people in the seventies and eighties, or the sensation which such a pamphlet as The Bitter Cry of Outcast London made when it was first produced. The separateness of the poor life and the rich life had hardened to a point at which mutual ignorance and repudiation of responsi- bilities threatened to become fixed in Enghsh thought. Social legislation was declared to be outside the sphere of Parhament, and most phUan- " The Beginnings of Toynbee Hall," by Mrs. S. A. Barnett. ■ Canon of Christ Church, and Begins Professor of Divinity at Oxford, ' The Commonwealth, July IdlS. Editor of The Westminster Gazette, June 19th, 1913. 310 THE ARCHBISHOP OF YORK thropic schemes were denounced as pauperising the poor. :' Barnett's effort was to break down this separation of classes and enlarge the idea of social responsibility. He had a prophetic zeal which kindled his fellow-workers. The Archbishop of York, in his reminiscences of Canon Bar nett, referred to the meeting in Mr. Sidney Ball's room, and said : Our conscience felt the rebuke of the contrast between the wealth of inheritance and opportunity stored up in Oxford and the poverty of the life lived amid the mean streets and monotonous labour of East London. In a vague way we felt the claim of that poverty on our wealth. Could anything practical be done to meet it ? The answer to that question was important. If it had not come, the movement might have drifted into mere vague sentiment or academic talk. It came that November evening. The Vicar of St. Jude's, Whitechapel, Mr. Barnett, then in the prime of his life, in his fortieth 5'ear, read a paper in which he sketched the plan of a " University Settlement in East London." " Something," he said, " must be done to share with the poor the best gifts." Let University men become the neighbours of the working poor, sharing their hfe, thinking out their problems, learning from them the lessons of patience, fellowship, self- sacrifice, and offering in response the help of their own education and friendship. " This," he said, " will alleviate the sorrow and misery born of class division and indifference. It will bring classes into relation ; it will lead them to know and learn of one another, and those to whom it is given wdl give." I well remember the effect of those words, or rather of his personaUty. There was no gush, no exaggeration, no claim to provide a solution of the social problem. There was simply the quiet and earnest appeal of an Oxford man busy in the service of the people to other Oxford men to " come and see," to learn the needs by sharing the life of that, to us, strange and dim outer world of East London.' It was in the rooms of Mr. Cosmo Lang ' that the under- graduates first gathered to support the foundmg of a Settle- ment to " enable men to live with the poor," and among the undergraduates who pledged their aid were Mr. Bolton Kmg,' Mr. P. Lyttelton GeU, Mr. J. E. KelsaU,* m. F. S. Marvin," Mr. J. A. Spender, Mr. E. T. Cook'— men whose generous hearts rose to meet the call, and whose gifts of years of patient service have laid the foundations of the Settlement movement all over the world. The committee 1 Stepney Welfare, July 1913. ^ Archbishop o£ York. 3 Author of History of Italy; Director of Education, Warwickshire County Council. * Rector of New Milton, Hants. ' His Majesty's Inspector of Schools. • Sir Edward Cook, author of The Life of Riialcin and Mi^s Florence Nightingale. ACCEPTANCE OF WARDENSHIP 311 formed out of Mr. Bali's and Mr. Cosmo Lang's meetings soon grew in size and importance ; an Association ' was formed, money was invested, and a Head sought who would turn the ideal into tlie real. Here was the difficulty. Such men as had been ijictured m Mr. Barnett's article in The Nineteenth Century Review of l^ebruary 1 884 are not met with every day ; and no inquiries seemed to discover the wanted man who would be called upon to give all and expect nothing. Mr. Barnett and 1 had spent eleven j'ears of hfe and work in Whitechapel. We were weary. My health-stores were limited and often exhausted, and family circumstances had given us larger means and opportunities for travel. We were therefore desirous to tvtrn our backs on the passion and poverty of East London, at least for a year, and take repose after work which had aged and weakened us. But no other man was to be found who would do the work ; and, if this child-thought was not to die, we must undertake to try to rear it. We went to the Mediterranean to consider the matter, and solemnly, on a Sunday morning, made our decision. How well I recall the scene as we sat at the end of the quaint harbour pier at Mentone, the blue waves dancing at our feet, everything around scintUlating with light and move- ment in contrast to the dull and dulling squalor of Whitechapel, which our new decision would make our home for an indefinite spell of labour and effort. ■" God help us," we said to each other ; and then we wired home to obtain the refusal of the big Industrial School next to St. Jude's Vicarage, which had recently been vacated, and which we thought to be a good site for the first Settlement, and returned to try to hve up to the standard which we had unwittingly set for ourselves in describing in the article the unknown man who was wanted for Warden.^ Neither was Cambridge behind Oxford in taking up the new movement, and fche splendid work of the men she sent to Whitechapel is told in Chapter xxxi. My husband wrote a great deal on the future Settlement, and we both lectured often on it, for it was difficult to explain what we meant. In the Memorandum of Association its objects are stated as follows : To provide education and the means of recreation and enj oy ment for the people of the poorer districts of London and other great cities ; to inquire into the condition of the poor and to consider and advance plans calculated to promote their welfare. To acquire by purchase or otherwise and to maintain a house or houses for the residence of persons engaged in or con- nected with philanthropic or educational work. This sounds prosaic, and perhaps it is better explained as — An association of persons, with different opinions and different tastes ; its unity is that of variety ; its methods are spiritual 1 Incorporated under Section 23 of the Companies Act, 1867. ' " The Beginnings of Toynbee Hall," by Mrs. S. A. Barnett. 312 WHAT A SETTLEMENT IS rather than material ; it aims at permeation rather than con- version ; and its trust is in friends linked to friends rather than in organisation. . . On another occasion Mr. Barnett wrote ^ : The men who settle may either take rooms by themselves, or they may associate themselves in a Settlement. There is some- thing to be said for each plan. The advantage of a Settlement is that a body of University men living together keep up the distinctive characteristics of their training, they better resist the tendency to put on the universal drab, and they bring a variety into their neighbourhood. They are helped, too, by the com- panionship of their fellows, to take larger views of what is wanted their enthusiasm for progress is kept alive, and at the same time well i^runed by friendly and severe criticism. But whether men hve in lodgings or in Settlements, there is one necessary condition besides that of social interest if they are to be successful in uniting knowledge and industry in social reform. They must live their own life. There must be no affectation of asceticism, and no consciousness of superiority. They must show forth the taste, the mind, and the faith that is in them. They have not come as " mission ers," they have come to settle, that is, to learn as much as to teach, to receive as much as to give. There is nothing like contact for giving or getting understanding. There is no Lecture and no book so effective as life. Culture spreads by contact. University men who are known as neighbours, who are met in the streets, in the clubs, and on committees, who can be visited in their own rooms, amid their own books and pictures, commend what the University stands for as it cannot otherwise be commended. On the other hand, workmen who are casually and frequently met, whose idle words become familiar, whose homes are known, reveal the workman mind as it is not revealed by clever essayists or by orators of their own class. The friendship of one man of knowledge and one man of industry may go but a small way to bring together the Universities and the working classes, but it is such friendship which prepares the way for the understanding which underlies co-operation. If misunderstanding is war, understanding is peace. The manifold nature of the new Settlement made it all the more difficult to find a name for it — one that would suggest thought and yet not designate a policy. My article tells why we decided to call it Toynbee Hall : '■ The University Review, 1905. TOYNBEE HALL NAMED 313 The 10th of March, 1884, was a Sunday, and Balliol Chapel was filled with a splendid body of men who had come in loving memory of Arnold Toynbee, on the anniversary of his death. Mr. Jowett had asked my liusband to preach to tliem, and they listened intently, soparatmg almost silently at the chapel porch, iiUed by the aspiration to copy Arnold in carhig much, if not doing much, for those who had fallen by the way or were " vacant of our glorious gains." . . . As 1 sat on that Sunday afternoon in the chapel, one of the few women among the crowd of strong- brained, clean-living men, the thought flashed to me, " Let us call the Settlement Toynbee Hall." To Mr. Bolton King, the honorary secretary of the committee, had come the same idea, and it findmg favour with the committee, our new Settlement received its name before a brick was laid or the plans concluded. On the first day of July, 1884, the workmen began to pull down the old Industrial School, and to adapt such of it as was possible for the new uses ; and on Christmas Eve, 1884, the first settlers, Mr. H. D. Leigh of Corpus, and Mr. C. H. Grinling of Hertford, slept in Toynbee Hall, quickly foUowed by thirteen residents, some of whom had been living in the neighbourhood of Whitechapel. From that day until the duties of war scattered the Residents it is true that — The succession has never failed. Men of varied opinions and many views, both poUtical and religious, have lived harmoniously together, some staying as long as fifteen years, others remaining shorter periods. All have left behind them marks of their residence ; sometimes in the pohcy of the local Boards, of wliich they have become members ; or in relation to the Student residences ; or the Antiquarian, Natural History, or Travelling Clubs which individuals among them have founded ; or by busying them- selves with classes, debates, conferences, discussions. Their activities have been unceasing and manifold, but looking over many years and many men it seems to my womanly mind that the best work has been done by those men who have cared most deeply for indi- viduals among the poor. Out of such deep care has grown intimate know- ledge of their fives and industrial position, and from knowledge has come improvement in laws, conditions, or administration. It is such care that has awakened ui the people the desire to seek what is best. It is the care of those who, loving God, have taught others to know Him. It is the care of those who, pursuing knowledge and rejoicing in learning, have spread it among the ignorant more effectively than books, classes, or lectures could have done. It is the care for the degraded which alone rouses them to care for themselves. It is the care for the sickly, the weak, the oppressed, the rich, the powerful, the happy, the teacher and taught, the employed and the employer, which enables introduction to be made and interpreta- tion of each other to be offered and accepted. From this seed of deep individual care has grown a large crop of friendship, and many flowers of graceful acts. -22 CHAPTER XXV " When two or three meet together and, in the presence of the higher ideal which appears in their midst, see the ignorance or the suffering or the sin which is round, they cannot help starting the machinery by which that goodwill may become effective." In March 1884 Mr. Barnett wrote to his brother : The event of the week has been the settlement of the Settle- ment. The premises have been bought for £6,250, a committee has been formed, and one Oxford Fellow has given £1,000. . . We shall have rooms for 16 men, a class-room for 300 students, large dining-room, conversation-room, and drawing-room. It will be fvui doing the architect work. I inherit the father's delight in building. . . Hoole's plans are attractive, and we shall have put up a manorial residence in Whitechapel. . . Do not be anxious. The Settlement will not add to the hardness of life — in some ways it is hkely to bring ease. We shall hve in space, comfort, and quiet, and we shall have about us the salt of the earth in the shape of Oxford men. I am not at all frightened for myself and go at it eagerly. I am more anxious about my wife, on whom the burden of housekeeping will fall, and more enter- taining, and whose sjrmpathies will be strauied by a still larger circle of those making demands on her. More and more I think depends on her. In Miss Townsend's reminiscences she said : Perhaps the most memorable holiday I ever spent was with Canon, and Mrs. Barnett in Yorlishire in 1884 — for it was during our long walks on the moors round Ilkley that they planned the future of Toynbee HaU. In the intervals of this epoch-making converse, we went picnics in their quaint httle two-wheeled carriage drawn by Miss Shaw Lefevre's fat pony " Tommy." As far as I remember we walked up the hills and down the hULs, and Tommy drew us (also walking) along the few stretches of level road. . . Such simple pleasures as these " seasoned by sweet converse " were the best relief from the toil and weariness of Whitechapel, and make happy memories for old age. Indeed we had many subjects for hard talk as well as "sweet converse." My husband believed whole-heartedly 314 GOVERNMENT BY RESIDENTS 315 in democratic control, and meant that Toynbee Hall should manage itself ; but in a pioneer scheme the direction of the lines had to be indicated, the goal visualised, and so the standard of furnishing and staffing, the uses of the rooms, and many practical matters had to be decided. As soon as the thirteen Residents came in, they and the Warden formed what was called in irony the " Grand " Committee, and to it every subject was referred, from the acceptance of Residents to the taking of Punch. By its members " with power to add to their number," separate committees were formed for entertamment and finance, while the old education committee of St. Jude's got fresh life and was added to the Toynbeo organisation. Very odd were some of the decisions of " Grand " Com- mittee. No one was to have soup who did not appear at dinner while it was being served, and I have seen learned professors and " double honour " men run up the long dming-room, and the Warden linger over the ladling with mischief in his eyes, to enable them to scramble into their seats before the tall parlour-maid whisked the tureen off the table. Three breakfasts were served hot at stated hours, and then a comic flag was solemnly hoisted, after which no one was allowed breakfast except on payment of a pro- hibitive fine. Dinners and luncheons were taken at a long table, but " Grand " decided no one was good enough to breakfast together and so small separate tables were used for the first meal. The arrangements were often altered. Spartan rules were occasionally issued on early tennis, hours for lights out, or limitation of service, and then " Grand " would be leavened by a more lenient spirit, and votes were passed for greater laxity, and another course added at dinner. Through all the twenty -two years, 1884- 1906, that my husband presided over " Grand," there were, however, two matters on which the decisions were never reversed. One was dancing and the other was Sunday lawn tennis. Every year the latter came up and every year it was vetoed — a curious decision by a body of men who duruig those years included Churchmen, Roman Catholics, Nonconformists, Jews, Quakers, and Agnostics. The planning of the Residents' work was greatly enjoyed by Mr. Barnett, whose powers for discernment of character and organisation of capacities and effort had full play. Once a week every Resident came for half an hour's " talk " with the Warden in his study, half-hours in which ideals 316 TALKS IN THE STUDY were conceived and schemes born. How some of the men thought about those " talks " can be best told by themselves. Mr. Alfred Spender wrote : 1 look back on years spent in Toynbee Hall in the early days, and think with admiration of his wisdom, kindness, and good sense in dealing with young men. How easUy in imwise hands the thing might have become priggery and absurdity 1 But Bamett had qualities of simplicity and directness which made the life natural and neighbourly, and banished all self-consciousness and superiority. You were encom'aged to go on with your profession, if you had one, and to give what time you could to the work of the Settlement. It was somehow made impossible for you to think that you were doing anything out of the common or conferring any obliga- tion by living in the Bast End. The Warden, with his ripe experience and wide iufluence, treated you as an equal, never preached or scolded, listened tolerantly to the crudest ideas, and found unsuspected cores of wisdom in them. He dropped little aphorisms which penetrated, but never ham- mered them into commonplace. . . Bamett encouraged his young men to see for themselves, and, having seen, to form positive ideas of what was to be done. Positive ideas were always his demand. . . His talk was often mystical and sometimes it seemed nebulous ; he believed that the need was to " spiritualise life," and " spiritual things," as he conceived them, were beyond definition though within reach of feeling. But always he came back to the practical. . . . The good feehng must materialise in something which it needed a cool brain to think out. There was no better critic living of schemes in the air, and I can see him still in my mind's eye applying that gentle Socratio method — so oarefiil not to hurt your feelings, but so obviously wise and experienced — to the well-meant impracticable notions in which generous youth abounds. How often in coniidential talks at the Warden's Lodge one's eyes strayed to the legend which was written over the fireplace — " Fear not to sow because of the Birds " ! I can see it now, as I still see the room, and Bamett in his characteristic attitude, leaning forward and clasping his knee. He was a vaUant sower, and scattered his seed with a fine sweep over a wide stretch of country. He had none of the sectarian feelings of the professional philanthropist. He was at peace with Church and Salvation Army, with Socialist and Charity Organisationist. He looked for the right spirit and had faith that the right method would follow. . .' Mr. T. Harvey Darton adds his testimony : November 23rd, 1917. — I remember so well the mixture of enthusiasm and clearheadedness with which one left his study at Toynbee, I felt myself that the whole world ought to be conquered, and could be conquered, and yet — what was most surprising to a young man as I was then — that common sense and tolerance were at least as necessary as enthusiasm. But it was the enthusiasm that really mattered. . . Everyone, but most of all the newer generations, need that wonderful sanity of the Canon's, which you have so well brought out in Vision and Service. I The Westminster Gazette, June 19th, 1913. • OPINIONS OF RESIDENTS 317 Mr. T. Edmund Harvey, who lived in Toynbeo nearly eight years, during five of which he was the Warden, wrote : There was something which touched the heart of youth m Canon Barnett'a humility of spirit which made him eager to share a young man's thoughts and hopes, to talk and plan with him side by side in the true spirit of comradeship. . . The Idndly name by which he was long familiar to the inner circle of Residents at Toynbee Hall was no idle one ; he was " the prophet " for us, and for a far wider world, in his vision of individual and national needs, of the sundered lives of rich and poor, selfishness and ignorance keeping them apart, of the way of reconciliation through mutual knowledge, sacri- fice, and co-operation, in his interpretation of the life and spirit of the Master Whom he served. Professor E. J. Urwick, who acted as Sub-Warden and lived with us many years, has said : Men and women of any age and class went to him for counsel. He was their equal comrade always, however raw and crude and siUy they might be. And his very powers of mind helped, and did not hinder, this sympathy. Perhaps the greatest of his powers was that of crystallising in a phrase the feeling and thought which most of us spend pages to express. . . But this power he used most to help the thoughts of others. We went to him in a tangle, hardly knowing what we felt or meant. We came away clear, our decisions focussed by his simple yet profound suggestions. Another characteristic added both to his power and to his lovableness. He was always young, and met every change of condition, every new combination of circumstances, with the vigour, freshness, and elasticity of youth. He was not afraid, therefore, to be inconsistent. His social and political views were not fixed, except in their normal foundations ; he was a progressive as naturally as some people are conservatives. My husband's methods of dealing with individuals may be illustrated by a talk between two Toynbee men. " Is Barnett sincere ? " asked the elder, a man about thirty years old, who had recently come into residence. " He seemed to flatter one." " Did he ? '- was the reply of the Resident who knew my husband intimately. "If you think, you will see his ' flattery ' consisted in expecting great things from you." In June 1913, when the news that my husband had left this world was flashed to all parts of it, that man wrote from a distant colony telling me of his grief, and added, ' ' He seemed to re-discover all sorts of my abandoned hopes and forgotten ideals and constrain me to work for them." The critics of my husband sometimes accused him of want of directness, and said he was "all things to all men," astutely perceiving and usmg the weakness of human 318 OTHER PEOPLE'S POINT OF VIEW character to further the ends he had in view. It was one of the little greatnesses of his daily life, that whenever and by whomsoever he had a fault pointed out to him, whether in the Press or privately, and however rudely or unsym- pathetically, he always said, " Now let us see what truth there is in that." His example I will follow, and recognise that there was a certain truth in his critics' statements. When we were in Japan we saw in the Temple at Naygoya the portrait of some great man — I forget who it was — m which the artist had, as an act of homage, depicted the sur- roundings as the great man would see them and not as the spectator of the portrait. This was specially noticeable in the floor-cloth, where the lines reversed all the rules of perspective. " Husband," I said, "that's how you see things, always from the other person's point of view." At the time he only laughed, for our object then was to arrive at the Japanese point of view, but the picture was often referred to. In his early manhood he deliberately and with effort of imagination put himself in other people's places when they sought his advice ; but later, as more and more people came around us, it became a habit of mind, and very tiresome I have found it. If difficulties arose with the household staff — and during the Toynbee days those for whom I was responsible numbered twenty-seven — he would argue vividly in defence of their delinquencies, and he so absolutely identified me with himself that I used laughingly to tell him that if any one struck Ma right cheek he promptly turned my left one — an action which in staff management did not always tend towards the upholding of discipline. But if he had to rebuke the wrong-doer — which he always did alone — the effect was remarkable. To convict a soul of sin was, he thought, the best help one human being could give to another, and believing, as he did, that the core of every heart turned towards righteousness, and with the trained capacity of understanding another's outlook, he was able to grip then- very beings, reveal to themselves their aspirations, and set them in repentance on the road to the attainment thereof. " How did you manage it ? " " What did you do ? " I used to ask when subsequent conduct showed a chastened offender. " Only dealt faithfully with!^him," was his summary, often followed by a detailed account of all that had passed, with INDIFFERENCE TO CREDIT 319 unexpected illumination in dark corners, enabling the ex- ternal stumbling-blocks to be removed. Truth compels me to add that the effect was not always permanent. My hus- band had, by the force of his longing for the fulfilment of the best in everybody, not only the power of probing, but a stimulatmg and controlling influence. This was so strong that often, when people were with Canon Barnett, they really were what he wanted them to be, and which he there- fore believed them to be. " You do not know him as he is ; you have never seen him when you are not there," I would say, and sometimes he would be startled into reconsideration of the character, but usually he returned to trust in his own insight of potentiali- ties, and would remind me that " He that belie veth doth not make haste." If it is understood that these characteristics were also active when he was dealing with his peers in their joint pursuit of public good, it may do somethmg to explain the objections of his critics. Mr. Barnett never stated what he wanted until he had seen the goal of the other men, and then he usually guided them, often by interjected questions, until someone proposed what he aimed at. "So-and-so proposed it; he thought it was his own idea," he would tell me. " But it was not true," I would say. " That man could not have conceived that idea." " He has got it now, anyhow," he would reply, " and will work for its realisation more, if he thinks he originated it." Again, he was entirely free from jealousy, and quite indifferent as to who obtained the credit for his good deeds or original thoughts. This did not lessen the di£6.culty, because when the Toynbee Hall work became well known, to him was offered the appreciation due to the work of many men. This also did not trouble him, not because he wanted the honour and glory tendered to accomplishment, but because he felt them to be of no consequence. More than once, when smaller people have remonstrated on not being recognised, he has striven to tender to them public thanks, but sometimes so clumsily that his words evoked suspicion. He was offering what he himself felt to be valueless. This may be elucidated by some words in the Survey of Mr. Robert A. Woods, who lived in Toynbee before he began his work as Director of the South End House, Boston, U.S.A. : 320 "ONE BY ONE" All that Toynbee Hall has achieved and suggested was the clear result of the ever-pervasive influence of a character placid, almost artless ; far- sighted, clearly convinced, soundly discriminating ; forgetful of self to the extent of forgetting that he had forgotten, but seeing the dignity of all his work in the largest bearing upon the nation and, almost from moment to moment, in its meaning to men as sons of God. Many organisations grew from those " talks in the study " with Residents. Indeed the hundreds of Journals and Records that stand on my book-shelves but very in- adequately report their conception, growth, development, success, or failure. The purposes of them all were the same — to increase knowledge and to create friendship ; in short, to learn about God and to love men. The methods were diverse, so much so that the purposes were sometimes hidden ; but Mr. Barnett did not believe in frontal attacks, and people had been so preached at, that direct teaching was shunned. In the 1889 Report it is stated : In the recently published work on the Labour and Life of the People of East London, Mr. Charles Booth illustrates the " amount of life set and kept in motion at Toynbee Hall" by giving the actual " bill of fare " for a single week " taken haphazard." It occupies nearly two pages in his volume, and includes ten Lectures (of which four were connected with the University Extension Society), nine Reading Parties, the meetings of two Literary Societies, 35 Classes of various kinds, a concert, a party to Boy Foresters, another party to those attending Recreative Everung Classes, the Annual Meeting of the Pupil Teachers' Association, and, as a standing dish, the Library. Prom October until Easter " something of the kind goes on every week." The character of the engagements changes some- what during the summer months ; out-door excursions, for instance, are more frequent, the open-air concerts m the Quadrangle take the place of concerts in the Lecture Hall. Some words of the Warden show what he felt to be more important than work which could be tabulated : If, however, a list could be given of all that has been done, a very inadequate idea of the work of the Residents would be left. " One by one" is the phrase wliich best expresses our method, and the " raising of the buried life " is that which best expresses our end. Of method and end it is as yet too soon to judge, but I would ask that no one should either ]oraise or blame us on account of what is seen. Our real work lies below these classes, systems, and entertainments, as our real object is far beyond the success which is measured by numbers and comfort. The Residents have all alike felt it to be a privilege to come in MANY RESPONSIBILITIES 321 close contact with those they have been able to serve, and they have been humbled by the welcome they have met. . . A man teaches what he himself knows. Of those who use the same means some have breathed the spirit which rouses the spirit of others to know and love God. . . And through all his work ran the permeating thought — '"Tis just the many mindless mass That most needs helping." The magnitude of the responsibility which was borne by one man will be better realised, when it is remembered that to Mr. Booth's summary must be added the Warden's interest in all sorts of educational activities, the work involved by the Art Exhibitions, his position as a Guardian in the Poor Law administration, the Children's Country Holiday Fund, and housing reform, as well as the ever- ramifying machinery of the parish, with its degraded population. That he felt not only its weight but his inability to do justice to all the branches of the work, some extracts from his letters to his brother wiU show : October 6th, 1888. — A very busy week is over and we are both well. . . All things are going fairly, none of them climbing. Some more workers were yoked on, but none, I fear, with the wings which assist bodies along the upward plane. On Wednes- day we received people all day long ; we are going to revive oiu- Weekly " At Homes." As it is, many come on everj' day, and often neither of us get out. As we look back on this week we are conscious that any one thing which has taken one-hundredth part of us might have absorbed the whole. Schools, institutions, the indi^aduals, want all our thought and time to make them even what we see they might be. Heigho ! ToYiTBBB Hall, Whttbohapel, October 3rd, 1896. To F. O. B. — Here we are settled down as if we had never tossed on the sea or walked about Moscow. It is pleasant to come home, but even friendship's weight is heavy. Y is again better to-day and so far ready to receive our 1 ,500 guests. Lord Peel, and Sir Charles and Lady Elliott from India, dine with us. It is tiring to come home and try to get one's shoulder under all things while they move. One feels as if the burden were not all on, and one expects to hear of losses. However, I thinlc all seems right. I had a long pull with all the Committees on Monday. . . Strange is the weariness which follows home-coming. I don't know if it is the different air or the sense of endless affairs^which seems to be attached to 322 WHAT MEN DID AT TOYNBEE everyone we interview ; anyhow, we have felt very tired and my wife's good looks have gone ! . . . It was the Warden's plan to arrange that the men, as they joined us, should see many branches of the Tojnibee and St. Jude's organisation, before they decided where they would be most useful, by sjntnpathy as weU as by service, and as they told of their experiences he was able to appraise qualities, tastes, and powers. Some records of their work, written by three early Residents for the 1886 Report at the request of the Chairman of the Council, Mr. Philip L3^telton Gell, are interesting, but as the writers wished to preserve their anonymity, I cannot add to the interest by giving their names, some of them now both great and celebrated. 1 . The first week at Toynbee Hall is always, I imagine, attended by a feel- ing that one is out of regular work and reduced to jobs. Such at any rate was my experience when I arrived last October, and was sent to play whist at the " Whittington " Club, to canvass for the School Board election, and then handed over to the " Sanitary Aid " to learn the nature of beU-traps and dust-bins. When, however, I began to feel my feet, my energies were transferred to the Charity Organisation Societj', and my weekly programme began to shape itself into definite form. 2. My mornings were devoted to reading and private coaching, but my afternoons till Friday were spent in visitmg in Limehouse. Monday evening was first set down for a class at the " Whittington." This was at 9 o'clock, but I generally spent some time beforehand in chat with the boys. Afterwards came Mrs. Bamett's weekly " At Home," at which we have had many most enj oyable discussions. When the Whittington classes were reconstituted I relinquished my elementary class for a share in a dramatic class on Wednesday. Tuesday was nominally my free evening, but actually was spent usually in assisting at the entertainments, con- versaziones, at Toynbee HaU, whenever my services either at the piano or otherwise might be required. On Wednesday I have a literature class for pupQ teachers, and my Thiirsday evening is pleasantly spent in assisting at the Boys' Club. 3. What do we do at Tojoibee 7 I should say that we see Ufe under vary- ing conditions and new aspects, and attempt to partake in the life we see. We learn much ; we unlearn more. We have too — and this is the most important of all — we have the opportunity not merely of enlarging our sympathies, of gaining broader views and a more catholic standpoint, but of building up a new system of relationship side by side with our old, of forming round the Hall a new world of student-friends and guest-friends, acting and reacting on one another, by whose means refinement and know- ledge may pass electrically as from friend to friend, and not professionally as from tutor to pupil. As years went on and increased numbers of those who cared for social well-being joined us, the performance of ONE OF THE WARDEN'S DAYS 323 specific acts of charity took a secondary place, in proportion to the value of accumulated experience and its consequent birth of fresh intentions. The Toynbee Hall Report said : The Prime Minister ^ in later days spoke of Toynbee Hall as a social laboratory, and under Canon Barnett's guidance it performed that office supremely well for a large number of young men who were going into pubUc or official life or into journalism, or who were presently to make careers in new countries. They saw and realised at first hand a great many things which other people only know from books and hearsay. A man whose experience it has been to visit and take precise notes of a thousand slum houses condemned as uninhabitable by medical officers, will think or write of the housing question very differently from the man who has only read the details in Blue-books. As I write, I feel how impossible it is to represent the " go " of the place, the sense of alert, pregnant life, the hopes that glorified mundane action, the scintillating activity that kept all sweet. It is not easy even to convey the facts, but when I was away fil, my husband always told me all he had done, and perhaps one of his letters will give some idea of his daily output : As to yesterday : 1 . Buckland ; talk re his own work and entertainment policy. 2. Fagan ; talk re work with C.O.S. and his reading. 3. Bullock ; talk re a friend in distress — his work. 4. A French Abbe about a friend who would go into Balliol House. 5. Kemp Welch ; re a defaulter in Balliol House and county court proceeduigs, also re Exhibition. 6. Peppin ; letters re Settlements' Conference, scheme for Rathbone. 7. Courtney Kenny ; re Kittle. 8. Courtneys ; re young Lionel Curtis — New Coll. — as their possible Secretary. D. Ball ; re Sanitary Council and Whitechapel authorities. 10. Miss Coker ; re pictures and gas fights. 11. Budgett — a new Resident. Right sort — comes on Monday. 12. Hart and Mrs. Lobb ; re class for former in afternoon school. 13. Miss Turriff ; re house for Cheltenham ladies. The afternoon went in seeing : 1 . Pond of Chicago. I gave him tea and he drank my cocoa ! 2. Jackson, to say good-bye which is put off now till to- morrow. Sorry to miss you. 1 Mr. H. H. Asquith. 324 ONE OF THE WARDEN'S WEEKS 3. Richards, to say he had passed first class and got his cer- tificate. 4. Important and confidential talk with Mr. Rathbone re scheme for Liverpool. 5. Harvey, doing well as cab-driver, earned 10s. a day last week — disease no better. Good fellow. In the evening : 1. I went into Toynbee and dined with Air. and Mrs. Fresh- field. Twenty-three men to dinner — settled plans with Haw re George Yard and Biden re his scheme. 2. Received Howard Bliss, who has come to stay for a week. 3. Antiquarian party — fifty people, interested in their work. 4. I went into Exhibition and conducted a party round three rooms, and 5. Returned to find your Worship Hour choir ia operation. All well. 6. Interviewed Miss Z. It is £200 deficit. She is, I think, getting more conscious that she is wrong. 7. Saw Tourell, who came with news of a legacy of £100 to the Shoeblacks. 8. Saw X., who squeezed my brain until I was tired. 9. Went to bed and slept admirably. . . I am just going into church, and would, before I go, have a moment's communion with you. . . I feel your love, your truth, your honesty. You are very dear, and I am glad to sit and think of J^ou. Now take care of your body, cultivate stupidity, and oh ! I do hope to get good news by Annie. And now I must stop or I shall be late. . . S. A. B. From Mr. Barnett's letters to his brother can also be gathered some idea of our interesting if sometimes too strenuous lives : On Sunday I preached for Price Hughes at St. James's Hall. I liked it in a way, and Hughes was paternal in the strength of the fact that when lie preaches they turn thousands away. On Monday the Liberal Three Hundred met, a good-looking lot of fellows, more eager about names than about tilings, lovers of a fight more than of a principle. There is something hollow about politics, and I don't believe myself in this agitation against the House of Lords. A moral agitation is like a war without bullets. When people agitate they mean blows, and when they go to war they mean killing. Lord Salisbury is so far right, but he is making the House the object of blows when the day for blows does come. The Three Hundred put me on all their committees. On Tuesday Toynbee was very full. V/e had twenty Cam- bridge men to dinner — two overflowing concerts — the dockers' THE ATMOSPHERE OF THE PLACE 325 meeting— a Co-operative Conference— and Z holding forth on cruelty to cliildren. He is most efiective as a speaker, but leaves one asking, " Is it true ? " The relation of Art to Truth is still misolved. Truth without Art is not comprehended— Truth with Art too often is lying. There must be a means by which it is possible to convey the truth whicli is bigger than \vords. We started all, and then went olF to a dull party in the West End, in the vain hope of getting pictures. On Wednesday we dined at the J-1 arts', met Mrs. A A of Chicago — a beauty in jewels who took philantluropy in vain and " drew " me to tell her that her sort would never help the poor because of the beam which prevent them seeing the poor. A plague on schemes and policies and institutions. If a dozen people live rightly and neighbourly they are worth more than many organisations. Harry Furniss was there and we had some talk about America. He is going to make merry in his sketches over their weaknesses. Frederic Harrison was also there and we heard how he is disappomted in the Labour members and the County Coimcil. Of course you have seen the Trades Union debate. Oh for backbone somewhere on either side ! We went on to Lord Brassey's and met Lord Cross, Lord Aberdeen, Sir H. Cunning- ham, and some other interesting folk. Thursday went in daily duty, and as Toynbee is full all my long mornings go in seeing men. The wife went to her Board of Guardians in the afternoon, and in the evening we had two big parties as well as the smoking debate and the usual classes. Sir Harry Verney, who is nearly ninety, came to the debate. Mac- namara was also with us. We hke him. He is rough, vigorous, uncultured, but he is human. On Friday we had a choir party and enjoyed the simple pleasure of entertaining our own simple folk, and got late up here [Hampstead]. To-day we have had a four hours' drive in the spring sunsliine which did us good. We talked round our plans. And in order to realise the atmosphere of the place, to the Warden's work must be added that of the eighteen Residents, the ever-increasing group of Associates, and later the fifty- nine inhabitants of VVadham and BaUiol Houses, to all of whom my husband gave, not only sympathy but detailed direction and large-visioned inspiration. CHAPTER XXVI " The 'problem which is haunting this generation is how to spiritualise the forces which are shaping the future . . . how to open channels between eternal sources and every days need.^' When I recall the degradation of the majority of the popula- tion of our parish in 1873 I marvel at my husband's faith which compelled him to provide opportunities for higher education in our schools. Before me lie handbills, brown with age, which set out that classes in singing, violin, litera- ture, drawing, carpentering, modelling, French, German, shorthand, book-keeping for women, musical driU, Latin, arithmetic, and English composition, wiU be held in the schools, and that " teaching on physiology " will be given by Mrs. Ernest Hart. They were very trying, some of those early students : young ladies whose affectations when " seeking crdtiva- tion " made one long to shake them ; prigs who quoted Browning on aU occasions ; excellent persons whose little learning made them mad- — with conceit ; pretentious youths who patronised all who had not read the few books they had perused, and who kUled by bad manners the belief that education made equality. Oh ! how difficult they were, and with them aU Mr. Barnett was patient, pointing out the heroic determination which made them turn to mental work after perhaps ten hours in the factory or behind the counter, or still longer days of domestic drudgery ; and discovering in each qualities which would live longer than the attendant irritations. And he was right, for I count still among my valued friends some of the most annoying ; and others recovering their mtellectual balance saw themselves in their right perspective, when the Toynbee men unconsciously taught them nobler standards. Soon after Toynbee HaU was built, the classes were trans- ferred to its care. 326 CLASSES IN ST. JUDE'S 327 1887. — If it be true that men learn more indirectly tlian directly, that they pick up more than they are taught, then it must be wise to group together various good and elevating iirfluences. It may be that the student who comes to learn carpentering will pick up from the history teacher or a fellow- student the knowledge which will rouse Ms sleeping energies, or that one coming " to grind " may stop to enjoy, as he finds in the companionship of books, or in the presence of the cultured, the better reasons which make life worth hving. Of these classes two of the Toynbee men gave accounts : 1886. — My Political Economy class consists of about a dozen of the best sort of working men, steady, thrifty, interested in the improvement of their order. They bring to discussions a good practical knowledge and common sense, and I my book-knowledge of the subject. Between my ounce of theory and their pound of practice we have some very interesting talks. I suppose my wider range is some small contribution to the subject, at any rate we are always open to discuss " any point at any distance from that point." At present the class is going through Marshall's Economics of Industry. These men have formed the nucleus of a considerably larger body of working men whom I am interesting in Relief and Education. In both of these lines they have done this year plenty of good sohd work that has filled me with admiration, 1886. — As I was engaged all day reading in chambers, my leisure time was the evening. Before leaving Oxford 1 had arranged to take two reading parties at Toynbee Hall, one in Latin, and another in English Literature. . . . Soon some of the Latin class expressed a wish to learn Greek, so I added a third class. AU three classes went on till well into the summer. Of the Latin and Greek class the majority were of the lower middle class — but one was a pupil teacher and one a foreman at the docks. In the Tennyson class I had a journeyman woodcarver, who also joined the "Hume and Herbert Spencer " reading party which I formed somewhat later. . . It is stiU flourishing with a majority of the same members with whom it started, and is at present in the throes of a final grapple with " Transfigured Bealism," and hopes soon to emerge into the humaner sphere of the ethical speculation. The number of classes increased rapidly, and how to find room for them was a continual puzzle over which my husband, the Sub- Warden, the secretary, and the housekeeper and I " continually did cry." Some of the men solved the problem by taking their classes into their bedrooms, but two chairs were insufficient, and to the weekly washmg of counterpanes and the presence of uninvited and wandering guests the housekeeper objected. Then the noises of the respective classes was a real difficulty which could not be ignored, and it was a proud hour when we unanimously voted the Warden " king of domestic organisations " because he thought of 328 CLASSES IN TOYNBEE HALL sandwiching the deaf and dumb class between those for the violin and musical drill. 1886. — Among other classes is that for the deaf and dumb. It would be helj^ful if those who possess pictures would lend them, and thus send the best message through the eyes to those who camiot hear. These people need specially to be taught the joy of miseltishness ; it is one of the privileges of the " hearing " that they can feel more easily for others. For one term the exigencies of space compelled the band to practise in the church tower, and it was great fun to watch the people in the street. Some passed too sodden with indifference to notice anythmg, but the expression of others who looked upward with surprised and sceptical wonder seeking the genesis of those heavenly strains was delicious. And some stopped to enjoy it ! On certain occasions our comparatively limited accommo- dation — and must I add the looseness of our discipline of organisations ? — resulted in offence ; as for instance when the same room had been lent to two sets of classes, and one group had to retue ; or when a party of hilarious children had been unthinkingly allotted the room next to a meeting which needed quiet ; but the atmosphere of the whole place was so friendly and hospitable that usually such contretemps only elicited good feelmg. I could write many stories of these classes : of the in- genuity of these " untrained " teachers who used their wider knowledge to awaken dull brains, who stirred sleeping public spirit by visions of ideal conditions, who killed self-content by the modesty of real proficiency. I could tell of friendship which transcended all barriers, and human relations too deep to die ; I could speak of a hundred acts of kindly neighbour- liness betwen class members, and also of some tragedies ; an undue influence and financial dishonesty, a quarrel and the alienation of half the class, an elopement born of broken confidence. Silly and wilful girls sometimes made difficulty, but such behaviour was not confined to one sex among the students. The enamoured youths, the swains who refused to be snubbed, and the appropriated men who allowed themselves too much freedom, had also to be dealt with. To them my husband gave higher standards and nobler goals as they talked alone in his little study. But speaking broadly with an experience of twenty-two years of Toynbee HaU life, I am able to state that there was very little of this class of VOLUNTARY TEACHERS 329 trouble. The whole tone of the place was too strenuous to permit it to take root, and the constant demand for more volunteer help gave outlets for energy. That all the workers and teachers were voluntary had its debit as well as its credit side. To the former had to be placed some hregularity, and the occasional dropping of a class from inability to find another volunteer to carry it on ; but on the credit side must be given the asset of enthusiasm so infectious that it reached to the humblest member of the class, and resulted in a large body of men and women, already over-worked, offering additional evening labour to make the advantages they enjoyed known by a wider chcle. Mr. T. Hancock Nunn wrote : We have a stafE of volunteers who at the beginning of each term " bill " adjoining blocks of dwellings, places of business, public offices. . . 1902. — It must always be borne in mind that Whitechapel is not peopled by students or would-be students. The ordinary inhabitant has httle or no interest in any world outside his daily life. To arouse such interest is not the least of the Education Committee's duties. When Polytechnics and other centres of teaching arose, my husband and I visited them and were struck with envy at their appliances and facilities, but only to return with renewed admiration of our volunteers who could contrive with so little machinery to achieve so much result. 1899. — Personal and voluntary service has, of course, its weak side, but it is no small matter that by such service it has been possible to organise a system of education with the names of 1,600 students on the register, and a set of reading parties where the attendance has been 90 per cent. . . The volunteers are those who, like the men of Gideon's band, have the zeal which can restrain itself, which can, if need be, begin with a reading party of two persons, and remain faithful tiU the two bring in ten others, or which will be content to serve on a committee, or act as a secretary, hopkig for nothing but to keep up fainting hearts, or strengthen weak wills to regular attendance, and make every- one conscious of his membership. . . When the place hums with activity, as it often does on a winter's evening, the believers in humanity may glow at the reflection that the work is almost entirely voluntary, and that of the very few — not more than five or six all told — who can be called officials, their service is out of proportion to the pay they receive. Receipt of payment indeed is proof neither for nor against a voluntary spirit. It is a test fit 1—23 330 SUBJECTS TAUGHT only for use by " the world's coarse thumb." But anyhow, it is personal service — the life of individuals — which feeds Toynbee Hall, and its one demand is for more lives. No list can be complete, but the following were among the classes which made the place hum with the activity of which the Warden speaks : Ambulance. Ancient History. Architecture. Arithmetic. Astronomy. Bandaging. Band of White and Gold. Basket Work. Bible Study. Biology. Book-keeping. Botany. Boys' Brigade. Brass Band. Browning's Works. Browning's Teaching in Music. Building Construction. Cadet Corps. Carpentering. Carving. Chaucer. Chemical Analysis. Chemistry. Child Study. Choral Class. Citizenship. Clay Modelling. Composition. Cookery. Deaf and Dumb Class. Decoration. Dickens's Works. Domestic Economy. Drawing. Dressmaking. Economics. Electricity. Electric Power and Lighting. Elizabethan Literature. Elocution. Elementary Science. Embryology. English History. English Literature. English Novels. English Poets. Entomology. Ethics. First Aid. French. French Literature. Geogi-aphy. Geology. German. German Literature. Greek. Greek Literature. Guild of Good Endeavour. Guild of Hope and Pity. Handicraft. Health in the House. Hebrew. Hebrew Literature. Herbert Spencer's Works. History of Enghsh Rocks. Home Hygiene. Home Nursing. Human Anatomy. Hygiene. Ideal Commonwealth. Italian. Italian Literature. Kingsley's Works. Latin. Latin Literature. Life Saving. Literature of the 19th Century, Literature for Boys. Literature of Victorian Epoch. Marlowe's Works. Mathematics. Mazzini's Works. Microscopy. Modelling. Musical Analysis. Musical Drill. Music in the Home. Music, Early History of. Napoleon. National Gallery. ELEMENTARY CLASSES FOR MEN 331 Natural History. Needlework. Orchestral Class. Pbdlosophy. Physical Geography. Physical Geology. Physics. Physiology. Play-hour for Boys. Play-hour for Girls. Political Economy. PoUtics (Present-day). Popular Ballad Choral Class. Plato's Republic. Practical Histology. Psychology. Races ancl People of Europe. Reading Clubs. Recitation. Repousse Metal Work. Rights of Enghshmen. Ruskin's Works. St. Jude's Guild. Science. Scott's Novels. Sewing. Shakespeare. Shorthand. Sight-singuig. Singing. Sketching. Social and Industrial Questions, Sound, Light, and Heat. Spanish Literature. Stretcher Drill. Swedish Drill. Swimming. Temperance League. Tennyson's Poems. Violin. Wood-carving. Wordsworth's Poems. Writing. Zoology. No mention has been made of clubs, and yet it was the work of Residents in clubs which caused a further development on the educational side. " We hated school work and chucked it when we left, and now we have forgotten," was what, in effect, many men in the clubs said. So when Mr. Wilfred Blakiston arranged classes in reading, writing, arithmetic, and geography, one hundred and fifty working men immediately joined, and for three nights a week labori- ously took up dull discipline with the goal of interesting study beyond. It was an interlacing influence, because it was the intellectual curiosity awakened by the Thursday debates and Saturday lectures which had made the men desire to take advantage of the classes and courses. For these, however, they found themselves too ignorant, and so had to begin again with elementary subjects. Great success attended this effort — in which Mr. Patrick Duncan joined with enthusiasm in 1903 — though the laborious work in which most of the students were employed often made punctual attendance difficult. Seven years after the classes were begun it was reported : 1905. — The number of men enrolled during 1904-5 was 253, of whom 125 qualified for the grant. . . The work done is of good quality and wiU lead up to work of a slightly advanced character in 1905-6. Two clubs were opened in connection with the classes in the summer — a Camera Club and a Swimming Club. Both justified their existence, and will be continued in 1906. 332 UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SOCIETY Li course of time the plan was copied by the Education Authority, and of this the Toynbee Report spoke. The London School Board declined to take up our classes for Elemen- tary Education for men only, or for Domestic Education for girls only. As both of these experiments, however, have proved successful, the Board was induced last winter to give a trial to a repetition of our scheme for Elementary evening classes for men at the Glengall Road Board School in the Isle of Dogs. At these classes, open to men only, the most elementary education is given, and is eagerly sought. This is the first school of the kind that the Board has opened. Side by side with the classes ran the courses of the Uni- versity Extension Society, in the work of which Canon Barnett had a great faith. Lideed it occupied so much of his thought that it is necessary to trace his connection with it from our first year in East London. 1874. — About fifty pupils joined the course, and we had a pleasant term's work. This year I hope to be able to take a house somewhat further East, where such classes might be opened on a larger scale. The teachers would be men of know- ledge and culture ; they would thus give their pupils something better worth having than mere information. In 1877 a room in Cambridge Road was hired, in which a course was given on " Light," the students paying a five- shilling fee. In 1878 the dissecting-theatre of the London Hospital was the only obtainable accommodation, and ninety-nine men joined for courses of lectures on Physiology, Political Economy, History, and Magnetism, given by " Honour men of the English Universities, who alone are employed by our Committee." The following year, 1879, Professor Huxley gave the openmg address, and A conversazione of the students was held in St. Jude's School, at which Mr. Goschen' was present. Pie asserted the aim of the University Extension Society to be " to provide people with the means of life rather than of livelihood," and he m-ged students not to look so much to the end as to the means of acquiring knowledge. . . We mvist bring about wider intercourse between those variously educated that the best system may be recognised. If some common room in connection with the classes could be established, the intercourse would be more possible. ' Later Viscount Goaehen. MR. ALFRED MILNER AND MR. FRED ROGERS 333 In this sentence — 1879^ — lies the seed from which sprang Toynbee Hall— 1884. In practice the intercourse so ardently desired between the East End and West End had already begun, for the Hon. Secretaries were Mr. Fred Rogers, a working book-binder of MileEnd,E., and Mr. Alfred MUner, of Claverton Street, S.W. As an outcome of theu* fruitful co-operation more students had joined and my husband's anxiety was to hold them together. 1881. — •Professor Henry Morley gave the opening address in our schools and about 200 students joined, a nucleus of earnest workers. One sign of their earnestness is the formation of an Adam Smith Club, which now meets regularly for the study and discussion of questions of Political Economy. Another sign is the readiness with which a plan for visiting museums, etc., on Saturdays has been taken up. It will be a pity if this beginning is left to perish. I see great difficulty in carrying it on. The difficulties are not mentioned, for in the Reports care was taken not to wound the parishioners, but the miserable accommodation in the school-rooms, and the rough conduct ia the streets, seriously affected the regular attendances of the 200 students. However, nothing daunted the courage of that group of early educationalists, and the next year the Committee decided to reduce the fee to one shilling per course of ten lectures. The effect made a deep and lasting impres- sion on us both. It is so difficult when one has never felt poverty to believe that two shillings can make so much difference, especially when it is to obtain an advantage spread over a whole three months, and the enlightenment saddened us. 1884. — The reduction of the fee to one shilling operated so as to bring over 300 students to the classes, of whom 50 offered themselves for examination. The result is most encouraging to a Committee, which, in the face of disappointment, refused to beheve that the highest education was amfitting to God's children because they were poor. If it be the difference between one shilling and three shillings which has kept them so long out of their inlieritance, the fact is one to be remembered bj' those who waste much on what profits no one. In 1884 Toynbee Hall was opened and the University Extension Society welcomed within its walls. My husband 334 GOD REVEALED THROUGH KNOWLEDGE had real pleasure in at last piloting the faithful students, whose demand for education had enabled them for ten years to bear so many inconveniences, to more suitable premises. In St. Jude's Report he spoke of his faith in the evangelismg force of wider knowledge : 1885. — The University Extension Societj' has this year carried on its classes in Toynbee Hall. The number of students has risen to 455, a Library of over 2,500 volumes has been formed, and frequent conversaziones have been held, at which the Bishop of Bedford, Mr. Goschen, Professor Bryce, Professor Morley, and Professor Seeley have been present. . . Ahhough the Committee is encouraged to nourish great hopes, no one is foolish enough to think that any movement can give the nostrum by which all the evils of the time may be cured, but, for my part, I believe that this Society is taking the line of success. If years ago, when the evils were as great, a remedy was found in the mission of those who took the news of the best to the worst, and carried light to the darkest places ; if the Revelation of God has been the glory of the Church, a like glory is now within the reach of the University teachers. It is they who may make common the Word of God, the Word which comes through His latest gifts of knowledge, and it is they who preach the Gospel, the means by which those enslaved by toil may move in higher and wider sjiheres of life. If as yet their work wants the Divine impulse, the touch which would give it power, we may surely wait, seeing what they already do, and knowing that the ways of God are slow. The advantages of moving into Toynbee Hall included the sharing by the students of its full and pulsating life. One of the early students wrote : At last we were able to leave the Schools and go mto the new Toynbee Hall, where everybody who liked had fresh opportunities. Incidentally I recall a little scene that happened once in the Lecture Hall. Lord Wolseley had dmed at Toynbee Hall and was to give a talk to the students after- wards. The corridor doors communicating with the lecture-room were open, and when the Warden and Lord Wolseley reached them there stood old Mr. Stockham as straight as a poker at the salute. To see the Field Marshal acknowledge the salute and then, recognising a former old fighter under him — in the Red River Expedition — wring his hand in hearty greeting and pleasure, did one good, and the Warden seemed lighted up with pleasure too. From that year to 1906, when Ave left Whitechapel, every session marks some advance, some disappointment, some fresh scheme, some change, the only unchangeable factor being Mr. Barnett's faith. STUDENTS FIX THEIR FEES 335 In 1887 the need of co-ordination is faced, for " tit-bits of knowledge are fatal to real mental training." After speaking of increased numbers he indicated the idea on which the AVorkers' Educational Association is founded : 1887. — It remains now for the University Extension Society to co-ordinate its teaching, to give not only isolated lectures, but to guide students in the choice of courses, and to provide for any- one willing to trust to its care adequate training in Science, Art, or Literature. In hospitals the sick owe as much to nursing as to the doctor's directions, and in our centres of education the students must have not only the direction of the professor, but the constant care of the tutor. In 1888 the students were invited to fix their own fees. One shiUtng was charged for registration, and beyond that sum each member decided what he or she should pay. This plan was admirable, for while the lesson learnt by the large addition of the students when the fee was reduced to one shilluig per term was not ignored, to those who had more money or desire for self-sacrifice, the opportunity was given to pay towards the expenses of the teaching they valued. On this Mr. T. Hancock Nunn wrote in the Toynbee Record : 1888. — It is noticeable that though the number of working men at the lectures has increased, considerably more persons than before have taken higher priced tickets ; one-third of the total number have paid either 5s. or guinea fees. In 1890 a note of congratulation is sounded on " the growing solidity of the work," no less than 11 per cent, of the whole number of students having entered for the examin- ation, of whom 98 per cent, had passed and 36 per cent, gained distinction. The following extract is from the report of the examiner in Hygiene : 1890. — It must be very gratifjrLng to find that the patient teaching of science in this centre is bearing fruit in such a solid and comprehensible subject. . . Of those who have acquired marks of distinction, each one i.'; quite fitted to deal with the problems of public health and sanitary science, either as inspectors under the supervision of medical officers of health or as holding situations (such as matrons and masters of public institutions, workhouses, etc., nurses, school masters, school mistresses) in which ques- tions of hygiene would come under their consideration. . . The paper sent in by one of the candidates obtained the highest number of marks I Ijave ever given in any examination for this society; and it does the 336 STUDENTS ELECT COMMITTEE writer of it the highest credit, not only for the accuracy with which she states her facts, but also for the concise and vivid manner in which she puts them down.^ Many of us, having attained to that height after seventeen years of work, would have rested, but not so Mr. Barnett. The same year we find him democratising the society. " In the future," he wrote, " the Committee wiH be elected by the students." He made also the further suggestion that it should become the parent of other centres. 1890. — The 600 students, and the many societies attached to them, set one thiriking whether the time for a forward movement has not arrived. It might be possible for this centre to become the mother of other centres, to relate the classes to one another, and so put within the reach of each student the means, not of getting a glimpse of a subject through twelve or twenty-four lectures, but of a thorough mental training. . . To achieve this, courses of lectures would have to follow one another, and a stafE of tutors would have to be appointed. This missionary plan was carried out, and centres started in Limehouse and Poplar with four courses, which were attended " by nearly 400 students drawn from the artisan classes." In 1892 Mr. Barnett reported : The Committee hope to help in doing something which will want doing, even when Trades Unions have raised wages and County Councils have given technical education. Men must have knowledge ; and the means which furnish the present with memories of the past, which develop taste, draw out reverence and aid the powers of expression, are as important as those which increase wages. The Toynbee Record supplied more detaUs : 1892. — University Extension has made rapid strides this autumn, with eight courses on hand. Professor Gardiner's lectures are the best attended in Whitechapel, the average attendance being 124. Dr. Fison's Advanced Electricity comprises a select 35, who, to judge from their papers, appear to be working hard. Mr. Budler's most mteresting course attracts an average of 07 students. Of our two Literature courses, Mr. GoUancz's class, on the Development of the Elizabethan Drama, meets in TojTibee Hall to the number of .'!0 ; the Rev. Ronald Bayne's, on Shakespeare, meets in the Lolesworth flub, and is attended exclusively by members of work- 1 The lecturers were Dr. S. R. Gardiner, on " English and European History " ; Mr. Walter Pye, on " Hygiene " ; Professor V. B. Lewea, on " Chemistry" j and Kev. P. H. Wicksteed, on " Sociology." SUNDAY MORNING LECTURES 337 men's clubi?. The average attendance is 58, and all stay to an informal sort of class at which questions are put to the lecturer. Of the courses farther east, Mr. Harold Spender's at Poplar on England, India, and the Colonies, and in Limehouse on the French Revolution, have attracted 150 each, mostly workmen ; whilst Dr. Fison's lectures in Lime- house on Electricity are listened to by an audience of some 210 students. To these courses, illustrated by limelight — then an inno- vation for adults — the fees were sixpence for a course ticket, or one penny for a single lecture. At the inaugural meeting the Duke of Devonshire took the chair, and among our amusing memories is his amazement when, after dining with us, we took him to the Town Hall in a cheap, convenient, but public conveyance. But he liked it, for he came again to distribute certificates. In that same year- — ^1892- — conferences were held on " how to provide technical education that should have for its object the scientific principles underlying technical pro- cesses " ; the consequence being the formation of the Electrical and Chemical Societies. A year after this prolific session, Sunday morning lectures in History and Science were started — a step which again raised angry protests ; but Mr. Barnett argued that for real study men needed brains untired by a long day's work. In 1894 not only were there eight courses running — five at Toynbee, three at Limehouse and Poplar — ^but a summer pioneer course at MfilwaU attracted 280 men. Indeed that year their zeal carried the students through three summer courses, a still larger percentage entered for examination, " and there were no failures." Three years afterwards the Toynbee Report stated : 1897. — The total average weekly attendance at the University Extension lectures and the various classes during the winter and spring was 916 . . . and during the summer 517 students were in regular weekly attendance. It sounds delightful and was so, and I can stUl recall the excitement of first nights, when Mr. Bolton King and Mr. Monk and their train of willing helpers sat by the long im- provised table under the stahs and booked students. I can see Bolton running up the stairs to teU us the numbers, what subjects had been taken up, and what had been a " frost," and I can still feel the glow of sympathy with my husband's pleasure when he saw the great body of students welcomed in the splendid Hall of the Drapers' Company, for I knew that he was remembering that little band of fifty earnest souls who had sought higher education in a small 338 TUTORIAL CLASSES STARTED room up a dark passage in 1873. Fifteen years afterwards he was able to write to his fellow- workers : 1888. — The University Extension Society has now established itself in London, and we must always be proud that one of its earliest centres was in this parish. But in the zenith of its success those who watched saw a change. It shall be given in the words of Mr. E. J. Urwick, then actmg as Sub- Warden : 1899. — There can be no doubt that the conditions with which our educa- tional system has to deal are changing gradually — the centre of attraction has shifted ; it is no longer to be found in the lecture-haU so much as in the meetings of reading-parties, societies, and classes. A few years ago a good University Extension Society's course was sure to attract an audience ; now the attendance mil not be more than two-thirds of what it was. . . Fortunately, there is no correspondmg diminution of interest in the other departments of the work. The attendance at the classes has been better than usual ; the short courses of lectures have been very successful ; and the vigour of the many societies and educational clubs has been more than maintained. . . Paced with these facts, Mr. Barnett revived the idea he had outlined in 1887, of tutorial classes, by which he hoped, in small numbers in co-operative study, and by personally directed home reading, to enlist each student's initiation and powers of selection in the development of his own intellectual life. These hopes he had often expressed, but it was not until thirteen years after he had urged the provision of pro- fessional tutorial classes that the To5rnbee Council reported : 1900. — Important is the experiment of providing tutorial classes . . . which, at the Warden's suggestion, has now been sanctioned by the Uni- versity Extension Society. Three of these classes have been arranged for the coming year, in Literature, History, and Chemistry. They will be limited as to numbers, but they will provide far more thorough and systematic teaching than is possible in a course of lectures. How that scheme has grown and become a mighty force in the nation is told in the reports of the \Vorkers' Educational Association, but no one can report on the multitude of deep and wonderful friendships which have arisen between teacher and taught, or the moulding of lives resulting from co- operation in pursuit of knowledge. In 1902 Mr. Barnett reported a fresh move by the Com- mittee : Application for a grant was made to the Board of Education for the Tutorial Class^ and on the subjects being approved, seven. DR. S. R. GARDINER 339 classes were placed under Government inspection. It is hoped that this step will have the effect of maintaining the high level of regularity already reached, as well as of easing the financial burden of the Committee. It was one of the charms of the atmosphere of Toynbee HaU that men avoided rather than sought recognition of their labours, but the determination of his students to honour their veteran lecturer could not be set aside, and indeed it was the recognition of years of devoted labour, not only on dear old Dr. Gardiner's part, but of the large body of men who served the University Extension Society m the same spirit as men serve the Church. The Toynbee Record said : 1899. — On April 22nd a crowded meeting was held in the Lecture Hall, and Dr. Gardiner was then presented with a silver bowl, as a reminder to him of the affection and respect that he had stirred among us during his twenty years' association with Whitechapel. The Warden presided, and the Bishop of London was among those who had come to do honour to the guest of the evening. In the course of his speech the Bishop expressed the significant opinion that in the annals of literature there was no more conspicuous example of a man whose life was his work and whose work was embodied in his hfe than Dr. Gardiner. " The world generally," added Dr. Creighton, "does not know what a great man Dr. Gardiner is, although some day it will make the dis- covery." To this high tribute the fitting counterpart was found in Blr. Bruce's testimony of the friendliness and the " intense simplicity " of Dr. Gardiner's teachmg. Indeed it is not possible to chronicle the gift of the mass of service rendered, but the names of two men cannot be omitted, for my husband was wont to say that to the work of Dr. R. D. Roberts and Mr. J. E. Monk the success of the Whitechapel centre was due. To both he gave warm and admiring friendship, realising that the force of intellect, continuity of purpose, and weight of character that each possessed could have obtained for them coveted positions in the world, had they not in their several ways dedicated their great powers and best years to public progress. Below all these educational organisations lay Mr. Barnett's deej) hope of establishing an East London University. We often talked of it, coveted neighbouring buildmgs, and visualised Toynbee Hall as the tutors' residence surrounded by many houses filled with students, whose course of higher education would be compatible with self-support. 340 A COLLEGE OF THE HUMANITIES 1882. — The scheme by which a kind of East London College may be estabUshed is fully shaped in my mind. . . It will demand an effort on the part of those who have faith in the power of knowledge to give means of life to working as well as to leism:ed people. . . Too often has it been said that the best is above the heads of East Londoners. The capacity for the best follows no such arbitrary lines. . . As one of the Beaumont Trustees, I hope to be able to do a little towards establishing that East London College or Athenaeum which was in our thoughts when, ten years ago, my wife and I came to live here, and began to reahse the needs of our new neighbours. To F. G. B., 1885. — Seeley, who lectured one night, has been staying here. He shows that with much shrewdness he has any amount of enthusiasm. He enters most warmly into our hopes for Tojmbee Hall, and will support it till it becomes a real centre of learning. There is no reason why it should not so become, and further than that be a centre to diffuse warmth as well as light, love as well as culture. 1902. — A scheme for establishing a College of the " Hu- manities ' ' is floating before some minds, a scheme which will show itself boldly — as boldly as colleges of science or technical teaching — and offer teaching in History, Philosophy, and Litera- ture with an assurance of their value. . . Knowledge which makes for the joy rather than the comfort of hfe. Yet lest anyone should think that Canon Barnett had altered his aim, and had put education as an end instead of a means, the following extract from The Toynhee Record is reprinted : 1893. — The social problem ia at root an educational problem, and they who have been concerned at Toynbee Hall to raise the standard of living have been driven to develop educational schemes. They found that without more knowledge, power might be a useless weapon and money only a means of degrada- tion, and that without more education, local government would hardly be for the local good. . . They reahsed that no secure position would be won until people were educated to win it for themselves, and that no happiness is satisfactory except that which comes from " the inward eye." Here then is the reason for the classes. . . Here is the reason for the schemes of study which are set forth as trustworthy guides for those who want their minds fitted to be always learn- ing ; here is the reason for all the efforts to put alongside of wage-earning subjects such mind-stretching subjects as the principles of history and of science, A DIRECTOR OF ENTHUSIASM 341 The danger is lest the development of the educational side of Toynbee Hall may lead some students to think that education is the end in view, and leave them satisfied with the joy they are finding for themselves and with their own growing power to choose the good and refuse the evil. The safeguard against this danger is the memory of the object for which all the teaching has been given. . . The object is that there may not be so many wretched, home- less people on Commercial Street doorsteps, so many unem- ployed half-fed in their single-roomed homes, so many neigh- bours full of envy, hatred, and uncharitableness ; that work may not be so destructive of mind, and that the problem of capital and labour may not be settled by bullets. The memory of this object will make students feel in honour bound to become ser- vants. The acceptance of the teaching will be to them as the acceptance of the Queen's shilling by which the receivers are pledged to be loyal fighters on her side. If a,nj man or woman asks " What can I do ? " Mrs. Bamett and I would be ill-fitted for the place we occupy if we could give no answer. The Warden of Toynbee Hall is not a head of an Educational Institute ; he is a director of enthusiasm disciplined for the service of East London. Study and service should be the watchword of those who belong to this centre of education. To me, with a thousand interwoven memories, it has been deeply interesting to give, however sketchily, the story of thirty years' efforts to obtain higher teaching in East London, the success of which justified Mr. Barnett's faith in the appreciation of the democracy for the best. But he affirmed that the best must be supplied before it could be demanded, and to supply it in such attractive forms as to create a demand he worked unremittingly. Indeed, all through our forty years of life together, the only occasions of disagreement arose from his overwork, and among its chief causes was the provision of higher education. Even in the last few years when his health was fraU and fatigue brought on a heart attack, he never deserted the committees which strove for higher education, and many anxious times have I spent sitting in the car waiting for him in the great court- yard of University College, where some of the meetings were held. CHAPTER XXVII " Humility is the lowly and true estimate of self ; it is acceptance of the place appointed by God, whether it be in the front or the rear." It gave Canon Barnett genuine satisfaction to place the Toynbee rooms at the disposal of the School Board to enable Sir Edmund Currie's idea of pupil-teacher centres to be accomplished^ — 1885. The centre, which was under Mr. and Mrs. Bannister/ did not remain long in Toynbee, though long enough to enable Mr. E. B. Sargant to found the PupU Teachers' Association for the boys, of whom Mr. P. Lyttelton Gell, the Chairman of the Toynbee Council, wrote in the Toynbee Report : 1886. — These boys, the teachers of the commg generation of Englishmen, are, in what should be the brightest and freest time of their lives, subjected to a never-ending and monotonous round of cramming and being crammed, and have little chance of seeing anything of the brighter and nobler side of learning. They greatly want the friendship of men who have been ac- customed to regard the acquisition of knowledge from a more disinterested standpoint, men who can imbue them with something of their own love for literature and science. . . I have read literature with them, first Charles Kingsley's Water Babies, which they began with thinking a sUly nursery book, and ended with finding too deep for them; then some Tennyson, and lastly More's Utopia, which pleased them very much by its anticipation of modern problems of education and politics, though they originally chose it as bearing on the period of history for their scholarship examination, in that thought of " what will pay " which is bound up with all their studies. The association existed for many years and was productive of much good. On the nights for debates, the boys met early in the Toynbee drawing-room, played whist, and ate teas the size of which left the beholders wondering, and then debated with much vigour questions like " Votes for women," " The House of Lords is useless, dangerous, and ought to be abolished," " Democracy has not failed in France " — 1888 — " Parliament should interfere to limit the hours of labour " — ■ 1889. People such as Sir William Markby, Mr. Lyulph 1 still valued friends, and now living quite close to me in Hainpstead Garden Suburb. 342 PUPIL-TEACHER CENTRES 343 Stanley, Lord Londonderry, or Mr. T. J. Macnamara, M.L.S.B.,' took the chair, and unconsciously educated by setting standards of worth. The pupil teachers did all the debatmg themselves and great nonsense they often talked, but they were m earnest and solemnly recorded their decisions. Mr. E. B. Sargant, Mr. G. L. Bruce, or one of the other Residents was always present, though intentionally unobtrusive, and sometimes Mr. Barnett went in and gave them one of his pleasant " touch-the-spot " talks, or took in the public lecturer of the evening to say a few words. I recall visits from Lord Wolseley, Lord Brassey, Lord Monks- weU, Sir Alfred LyaU, Mr. Frederic Harrison, Mr. Leslie Stephen, Mr. George Macdonald, Mr. Henry Arthij^ Jones, and Dr. Fairbairn, aU of whom were interested in the lads. Of one meeting The Toynbee Record said : 1889. — An interesting incident in the evening was the reading by Mr. J. Russell of some passages from a description, by Count Leo Tolstoi, of his village school in Russia. Exclamations of derision and incredulity were provoked by some parts of the narrative, while others were listened to with the closest interest. Besides the debates and reading parties, Mr. Sargant instituted a large athletic organisation with tournaments, and matches, and shields, and trophies, all of which the boys hugely enjoyed and which, people say, have deep moral significance. There was a rowing club too, vaingloriously called " The Argonauts," which was coached by an Oxford blue and applauded by a Cambridge stroke, but on the one occasion when Mr. Barnett and I went to Chiswick for their gala day I thought they did very badly, and wondered, as I have often done in life, how far truth should give place to encouragement. Whatever the medium, the boys could not help being up- lifted by Mr. E. B. Sargant — a nature so poetic as to be unpractical, so public-spirited as to conquer unpracticality, and all the time tenderly watchful for the sphitual potentiali- ties of every neglected chUd. He gathered leading educa- tionalists to listen to his ideals and set a new standard for some of them. The Toynbee Record reported : ]^889. — On February 12th, 1889, the annual meeting of the London Pupil Teachers' Association was held at the Portman Rooms. Although the roads were walled with snow, 300 ladies and gentlemen attended. 1 Parliamentary and Financial Secretary to the Admiralty. 344 PUPIL TEACHERS AND THE UNIVERSITIES Among the speakers were Sir E. Lyon Playfair, Dr. Montagu Butler, Mrs. S. A. Bamett, Hon. Alfred Lyttelton, Hon. E. Lyulph Stanley, Dr. Gladstone, and Mr. E. B. Sargant. Of the policy of pupil-teacher centres my husband wrote : 1886. — The plan by which the pupil teachers are taught in centres affords them better teaching, tends to give^them the sense of corporate life, and breaks the isolation in which teachers are apt to hve. In the centres, though, their interests are narrowed by their companionship and by their studies, and it is most necessary that they should come into contact with other men and other thoughts. By such contact they learn their own ignorance, and in humility become more fit to be teachers of youth. Teachers, most of all men, need to be in the attitude of learners, and at present this attitude is somewhat rare. To help them to this desirable attitude Mr. Barnett formed a Scholarship Committee to send some of the ablest of the pupil teachers to the old Universities. Its first work was to award five scholarships — £25 each- — which were provided mainly by the gifts of young graduates. The Warden issued an address to past University men, pointing out that — 1893. — Those who have reaped, perhaps carelessly enough, what pious benefactors have sown, have an opportunity, in the case of these pupil teachers, of rendering to others what has been given so freely to them. By clubbing together to provide £25 a year (this being the cost of the University hi excess of that of the Training CoUege) "for three years, groups of men may send their scholar to college, initiate and enjoy his successes, raise the whole tone of elementary education, and through their teachers help to ' educate our masters.' " The next year twelve more pupil teachers were sent, taking their places both in Oxford and Cambridge under the same conditions as other undergraduates. The men who had gained the first scholarships had worked so well that, when in 1896 they took their degrees, the greater number passed in honours. There were then eighteen men at the Universities and a very large number more anxious to go. It was the money only which stood in the way. At this juncture the Drapers' Company stepped in, and by giving £500 a year made it possible to grant facilities for thirty men to receive the coveted training, and then the Universities took it up. At Oxford, BaUiol, Lincoln, and SUCCESS OF THE SCHOLARS 345 Brazenose Colleges offered respectively £50, £30, and £42 annually, and at Cambridge, King's and Christ's Colleges each created scholarships of £25 and Emmanuel one of £40. These, held m addition to the Toynbee grant, enabled the men to live iu college while they worked for then' degrees and were tramed for teachers. The Archbishop of Canter- bury blessed the plan and from all parts of England came more applications than could be met. Year after year the success of the men was chronicled, not only at the Universities but in the high places they took in the Queen's Scholarship list. In all these students Mr. Barnett took living interest, helping many over difficulties, linancial, mteUectual, or social. The Committee, which included the Rev. Dr. Percival, the Rector of Exeter College, Mr. Oscar Browning, Mr. G. N. Richardson — the Principal of the Day Training College at Oxford- — and representatives of the National Union of Teachers, the Teachers' Guild, the Metropolitan Board Teachers' Associa- tion, and the Metropolitan Centre Teachers' Association, always met m our house, and sometimes I gave tea to the would-be scholars while they waited, feeling the indignation which so often consumes me that men ready to use their brains for the public service should have to ask for charity to enable them to do so. They worked splendidly, and in 1903 my husband wrote with pride that — Ten of the pupU-teacher scholars have gained honours, six in the first class, in the past year, and their predecessors are fast mounting the ladder of the teaching profession. If I were writing my own liEe I should want at least two chapters to tell of the Girls' Pupil Teacher Association which arose at the same time as that of the boys. Mrs. Fawcett was the first President, but during our journey round the world — 1890-91- — the governing body elected me, nolentem volentem, to that honourable post, which I held to the last hour of the Association's life, an hour passed in the Council-chamber of the L.C.C., when, sitting in that exalted chair, I was surprised into speechlessness by wonder- ful gifts with affectionate inscriptions from our 2,300 members. What good times we had in those twenty years ! Twelve centres all over London from Battersea to Poplar, from Woolwich to Chelsea. Twelve hon. secretaries with their 1—24 346 PUPIL TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION gixl Committees and network of reading parties, and tennis, h.ockey, and swimming clubs. Twelve lectures, one in each term in the centres, on some literary, historical, or scientific subject ru)t in the curriculum. Twelve rambles into glorious Surrey and among Kentish lanes ; and then the annual inter-central functions. How splendid they were for girls and ladies alike ! Deep in my memory are many of the twenty visits paid alternately to Oxford ' and Cambridge, when our hosts in- cluded the Master of BaUiol, Professor and Mrs. Max MiiUer, Sir John Gorst, Mr. Phelps of Oriel, Sir John and Lady Burden-Sanderson, Mrs. J. R. Green, Sir Wihiam and Lady Markby, Mrs. Henry Sidgwick, Professor and Mrs. Mac- Alister, Mr. and Mrs. Rackham, Miss Hughes, the Vice- Chancellor, and above them all in the girls' eyes, Miss Clough. Not to be forgotten also are the tennis tourna- ments, when we were welcomed in our hundreds to large and beautiful gardens, and Sir Spencer Wells, Sir Charles and Lady Elliott, Sir Samuel and Lady Montagu, Mr. and Mrs. Yarrow, Mr. and Mrs. Alexander, and fifteen other generous rich ones regaled girls and their large body of teachers and Associates to unlimited strawberries and cream, and humorous speeches. Then there were the twenty expeditions to St. Paul's and the Abbey ,conducted by Dean Bradley, Canon Scott HoUand, the Bishop of Stepney, and that little lady of large know- ledge, Mrs. Alick Murray Smith. And it is not possible to count the personally conducted visits to picture-galleries and museums ; but we went and saw everything, including the studios of Mr. Watts, Sir Frederick Leighton, Mr. Thornycroft, Mr. Roscoe MuUms, and Sir Hubert Herkomer. Delightful also were the annual musical parties in beautiful houses, among which were Lady Battersea's, Lord Brassey's, Sir Edwin and Lady Durning Lawrence's. So was the sight of the Queen's HaU quite full of young teachers breathlessly listening to the performances of their competing choirs, judged by no less a person than Sir Hubert Parry. Then they learnt to swim. Oh ! the noise of those swimming competitions, and the extraordinary ease with which girls learnt aquatic feats ! 1 One teacher, now the head of her staff, has written : " I have a clear recollection of a day at Oxford, and Canon Bamett, surrounded by young teachers under a tree in a college garden, reading to them that wonderful Russian story Ivan Ivanoviich." MRS. BARNETT'S READING CLUB 347 And the conferences at Toynbee Hall ! The hum of the 200 or 300 ghls can still be conjured up from the recesses where mterestmg memories live, and their bright, eager faces, as they discussed their winter plans and demanded the impossible, are not liliely to fade. Then, too, there was the hymnology competition started by Mr. Aldis, H.M. Inspector, and the honorary members' branch which Miss Townsend worked, of young teachers who, having grown beyond the pupil-teacher stage, yet refused to leave us. The foundmg of the Magazine — 1896^ — was a great event, and its veUum-bound volumes were one of the gifts that I received when sitting in the exalted L.C.C. chair. The intercentral reading club, too, was very interesting, but of it an old member wishes to report : Mrs. Bamett's Reading Club held its monthly meetings in her large artistic Whitechapel drawing-room. In the summer we were bidden to the Hampstead Cottage ; there wo conscientiously carried on the discussion under the elm trees, occasionally taking peeps at the celebrated view through the pines. The nucleus of the Club were the Stepney pupil teachers. Many of us remained members after we had taken our places in the teaching world. There were also West End friends whose education had been obtained in different environments. They were a great addition to the intellectual capital of our Club. The book was usually a novel, and was selected by votes and perused at home. At the nest meeting three papers were read on it — one by an ex- member, one by a P.T., and one by a visitor. After the papers the talk was vigorous, Mrs. Barnett had a rare capacity for bringing out the best efforts of everybody. She sometimes startled us out of conventional lines of thought and compelled us to consider questions afresh. At the end she summed up what had been said. Many of us treasure those speeches. Then ideals were faced, hopes inspired, and brave maintenance of the best insisted on. Our influence on the children was never omitted, and homely illustrations of our difficulties surprised us, but then Mrs. Barnett had taught and loved some sorts of children: If there was time we persuaded her to read poetry to us. She liked Browning, and though some asked for Longfellow, we got Browning. " Not understand him!" she would say — "you have not tried, I will introduce you," and she did. After the discussion we all had tea (out of the best cups), and cakes, and then went home. Mrs. Bannister never missed, and Miss Brooks, and Miss Penstone. We are all grateful. Some of us got a new direction to our views of our profession. Yes ! to teU of the girls' side of the L.P.T.A. would take quite two chapters, but it was my work and not my hus- band's, and is only mentioned here so that the atmosphere of our home can be understood, and to say of my work, as he so often did of his, that I could not have done it without 348 SERVICE IN THE ABBEY him. We, lilie the centres, were individual but inter- dependent. Of the work itself Mr. Barnett wrote : 1S92. — If it be remembered that the time of these pupil teachers is divided between teaching at a Board School and learning at a " centre," it will be seen how valuabh'. must be the elTort which brings them into touch with sister-women whose lives have falk-n in other surroundings and ^vhich shows them something of the art, the literature, and buildings which put a past and a future around the present. To his brother Mr. Barnett often wrote of the young teachers : March 1885. — On Wednesday we had a party of girl pupil teachers. They are better stuff than the boys, but not very hopeful as the mothers of the future — mothers in more senses than one. May 1885. — Y has just been holding forth to the P.Ts. and is impressed by their inferiority to other girls of the same age. I wish I could rouse someone to run a tilt against education which has the faults of the law which Paul condemned. July 1888. — My wife is off to Cambridge with 100 pupil teachers. She is very well and has taken great pains in organising the party. I am going with a lot of TojTibee students to Taplow, 80 we shall not meet till the evening. I have spoken of the last hour of the Association's life being that passed in the London County Council chamber, but there was yet another, for some of us felt the Association had meant so much to the lives and characters of teachers and taught, that we wished to thank God. So with Dean Robinson's co-operation, a great service was arranged in the Abbey to which our Association members — some grey- headed — came in their hundreds, and to them Canon Barnett preached, saying again in that sanctified Worship House what he had often told us in the Toynbee rooms. It is not until teachers look into the mystery which ever lies beyond the limits of what they know, that they will truly exercise their functions as guides of those who, more than any others, hold the destiny of the nation. And after the service came the handshakes and the fare- wells, and in some cases tears, and so the Association ended : but not so its friendships. They exist stiU. RELATIONS WITH TEACHERS 349 Canon Barnett's relations with teachers were deep i£ somewhat complex. Believing as he did that the revelation of God to our time came by knowledge, he paid homage to their calling, but was ia consequence severe when it had been adopted from poor motives and was carried on un- worthily. Of all the sins committed by stumbling humanity he was hardest on self-satisfaction, counting humility the greatest virtue, and conceit the dead waU which blocked progress. To this fault the teachers have special tempta- tions. For some of his teacher friends, such as Mr. Winkworth, Mr. Widdowson, Miss Hickling, Miss Wild, Miss Penstone, Miss Davies, Miss Jenkins, Mr. Levy, Miss Harris, and Mr. Polyblank, he had unstinted admiration, holding that their devotion to the dullest duty, their self-forgetting ingenuity in mitiating fresh methods of developing the characters of the children, made them worthy of every honour. But it was just because these men and women showed in them- selves the heights to which members of the teaching pro- fession could attain, that Mr. Barnett regretted the lower plane on which the majority moved and were content to move. To F. O. B., 1887. — On Thursday we had a party of ele- mentary teachers. They are a set who need culture. We had thirty conceitedly ignorant, comfortably ugly men and women, to whom is entrusted the power once held by students and priests. We broiight them face to face with Holman Hunt and other real creatures, people who know and unconsciously teach humUity. To F. O. B., 1890. — On Tuesday Dr. Abbott dined with us and addressed 120 teachers on Bible teaching. He was very good, at once free and reverent, true and tender. The teachers showed a want of earnestness and some who spoke confessed to care only for the emancipation which comes from liberaUsm. The truth is that life to most is not serious, and so they do not care for a guide-book. To F. 0. B., 1891. — On Tuesday we were overwhelmed by 300 teachers who came to an evening party in greater numbers than they had promised. They came too early and were aggressive in their gratitude. Dear me ! the teachers do want to be sent on the quest of the Holy Grail. They are so cooky and so ignorant. It was my husband's reverence for little children and his limitless faith m humanity, if it were properly educated. 350 EQUIPMENT OF TEACHERS that caused him to demand sacrifices from those who had elected to teach. Thus the appeal of teachers to the pro- tection of a trade union, when proposals were made for the good of the children, aroused him as few things did, and was among the influences which caused him to advocate the abolition of the School Boards, which he believed were too much controlled by their teaching staff. Perhaps Mr. Barnett's keenest disappointment was the limitation of teachers' interests by the requirements of their profession, and their indifference to knowledge unless it told on then- salaries. He used to make many inquiries as to how the holidays had been spent, and be both indignant and pitiful when it came out that enough money had been wasted at Margate or Blackpool in frivolous excitements to have paid for a visit to Brittany or Switzerland, or a tour to inspect castles, cathedrals, canals, or anything that meant intelligent effort. But it he was severe on the teachers' self-complacency and self-seekmg, the moment that they turned towards the land from which they could get wider views and breathe rarer moral atmosphere, it was his hand and voice which helped and cheered them as they mounted the hUl Difficulty. For them all he demanded better education and greater liberty. The first step in Education reform is improved training for teachers, and second is greater liberty for such teachers to use their own methods to reach their own end. Vain is it for anyone to think that by rules and regulations he can secrue the real education of the people. Character is the chief element in good teaching, and character is the only product worth considering. When our system is such as to establish as teachers men and women who " think clearly, feel deeply, and bear fruit well," men and women who have the power to teach with authority ; when we have such teachers, we shall have people able to choose the good and refuse the evil, taught both how to enjoy the world and also how to enjoy God. For forty-five years Mr. Barnett's desire to obtain better equipment for teachers never weakened, and when he was relieved from the strain of actual school management he used his pen from the seclusion of the Abbey Cloisters with vigorous frequency. It.' is impossible to summarise a hundred articles, but the^'desne to break down professional as well as class barriers, and to open the best to all who would take it, runs through them all. TEACHERS' VACATIONS AT OXFORD 351 Among my treasured though not beautiful possessions is a framed photograph bearing the inscription " Presented to Mr. and Mrs. Barnett by the teachers in residence at Wad- ham College, August 1889, as a token of their appreciation of the services rendered by them to the cause of education." How they came to be " in residence m Wadham College " can be told by reprinting the leaflet which announced the plan in 1885. 1885. — On the suggestion of the P^ev. S. A. Barnett, the Master and Fellows of Balliol College, Oxford, have made arrangements for receiving in College for the threeweeks from Saturday, August 1st, 1885, to Saturday, August 22nd, about twenty teachers from the London Elementary Schools. Lectures on various subjects will be given by members of the University ; they will also be ready as far as possible to give advice and information to those teachers who are preparing for examinations. The College Library will be open for several hours every day, and per- mission to use other Libraries can be had on application. There will be opportunities for boating and cricket, and for excursions to places of interest in the neighbourhood. The Visitors will be lodged and boarded in College at a weekly charge of £1 Is. ; this will cover aU items except beer, wine, or spirits. They will be expected to conform to the ordinary rules of College dis- cipline. The College gates are closed at 10 p.m. during the vacation. In 1886 Sir William Markby and Dr. W. W. Jackson wrote the Report. In it they say that thirty men were received in Balliol and eighteen ia Exeter, and that — The schoolmasters expressed a strong sense of the benefit they had derived from their stay in Oxford. They showed a keen appreciation of the lectures given to them as something different both in kind and degree from the instruction they had previously received. They had also plainly conceived a warm attachment to the University, and had gained an entirely new insight into the services which the University is capable of rendering to the general education of the country. From the inception of the plan Mr. J. Murray Macdonald '■ took the responsibility of the headship of the party. He lectured every working day, and by Mr. Jowett's desire attendance at his lectures was compulsory. Thus for eight years all the teachers came under the influence of a character which, by its simple directness, its unquestioning sub- servience of private to public aims, and its intuitive recogni- tion of the spiritual life as the only basis for conduct, could not fail to do all men good. In 1887 the mvitations came from Merton and Jesus, 1 The Bight Hon. J. Murray Macdonald. M.P., author of European Inter- national Relations and The Constitutional Reconstruction of the Empire. 352 TEACHERS' UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION and forty men went into residence for two weeks. The next year the plans were more ambitious and the period of the visit was extended to a month divided iato two terms. Fifty-two men went up, some of whom stayed the whole month, the tuition being generously given by fellows and tutors, who kindly stayed up during the tune the teachers were m Oxford. From these visits grew the Teachers' University Associa- tion, which, with Mr. Barnett as President, strove to " pro- mote the training of teachers at the Universities." The Committee included : T. H. Wakkbn, M.A., President of Magdalen College, Oxford. Rev. W. W. Jackson, M.A., Rector of Exeter College, Oxford. Rev. E. H. Brabby, D.D., formerly Head Master of Haileybiiry. Rev. J. Percival, D.D., Head Master of Rugby. Sir W. Markby, D.C.L., Fellow of BaUiol and AU Souls', Oxford. J. Murray Maodonald, Esq., 15, Thuxlow Road, Hampstead. H. Dixon, M.A., F.R.S., Professor of Chemistry, Victoria University. Rev. M. Creighton, D.C.L., Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History, Cambridge. Donald Maoalister, M.D., University Lecturer in Medicine, Cambridge. Dr. Gladstone, Vice-Chaiiman School Board for London. Rev. Mark Wilks, Member of the School Board for London. W. RosTON Bourke, F.E.I.S., Member of the School Board for London. E. B. Sargant, M.A., Secretary, Education Reform League. R. G. Scott, M.A., Fellow and Tutor, Merton College, Oxford. J. B. Btoy, M.A., FeUow of Trinity College, Dublin. Right Hon. A. J. Mdndella, M.P. Mrs. Barnett. Various means were adopted to push the scheme, and there were many deputations, one to Sir Wihiam Hart Dyke— May 2l8t, 1887— headed by Professor Stuart, M.P. ; another to the authorities at Oxford ; and a third to the National Union of Teachers ; while of conferences, meetings, etc., there was no end. To them all Mr. Barnett gave close attention and directing sympathy, even when the inability to be in several places at once hindered his presence. For years the Association continued to use its influence for obtaining the highest education for teachers, holding as its principle the words my husband wrote long before Toynbee Hall was founded : 1879. — I would repeat my belief that the education of the people will not be satisfactory till it is widened by the introduction of interesting subjects taught by more widely taught teachers. MR. R. W. KITTLE 353 Such a teacher . . . will give to the children the interest which will kindle their intelligence and ^vill teach unconsciously lessons which will make life better worth living. Only a few teachers could, however, go to Oxford, and therefore in Whitechapel opportunities of obtaining wider knowledge were offered, not only through the classes open to all comers, but by a Teachers' Association. Thus to a very large number of serious-minded men and women, Toynbee HaU became their intellectual home, and Mr. R. W. Kittle their revered godfather. Of his influence even he was not aware, but his humility, gentle courtesy, and penetrating common-sense unconsciously rebuked conceit, restrained obtrusiveness, and banished pretensions, while his dedicating religion silently convicted the easy-going. " Imagine a Toynbee gentleman wearing patched boots," the Canon overheard a young teacher say. " Why not ? It's Mr. Kittle," was the reply of one who had learnt to understand something of the character great enough to ignore conventions. It is impossible to report the meetings, conferences, lectures, rambles, excursions that grew up under Mr. Kittle's fostering care. They ranged from a course on " Board School Sore Throats" and "Thrift in Schools," to " Teaching of History to Children" and "The Ethics of the Play- ground." Men and women at the top of the profession, such as Mrs. Bryant, Canon Glazebrook, Archdeacon Wilson, Miss Beale, Dr. Percival, Dr. Abbott, Dr. Alex. HOI, and Dr. W. W. Jackson came to speak to the ele- mentary teachers and to build bridges over the gulf between different classes in the same profession. The spirit in which they were welcomed is best indicated by quotations from Toynbee publications. 1889. — In dealing with teachers, we possess peculiar advantages. Our own education has fitted us to some extent to feel with and assist them ; and the University Extension Society, as it has here developed, with first- rate lectures and a keen organic life — democratic, modest, and intelligent — offers exactly the aid which our teachers, hving for the most part in great intellectual isolation, and working under a system of all-engrossing " stan- dards," are most in need of. 1892. — About 100 teachers from the nine Limehouse and St. George's Schools met in the drawing-room on April 12th for a chat with each other. . . At ten o'clock the Warden conducted the party round the Exhibition, and expounded the pictures in his best form. N«edleas to say he thoroughly 354 STUDY OF THE BIBLE interested his audience, some of whom came up afterwards with parties of their school children, and passed on the impressions they had received in their quiet private view. . . The thought of the immense leverage of such a body of teachers, if set single-heartedly to raise our young citizens, is most uispiring. 1898. — Toynbee's connection with the schools has many attractions. Residents who are quite unfit to influence the " lowest five per cent." find their opening among teachers and chUdren. The teachers, with intellectual interests awakened by their training, find a genial sphere in the intellectual life of Toynbee Hall, and the young graduate, anxious to help, finds men and women able to make use of him. At many of the meetings for, or conferences with, teachers, the Warden either took the chair, or if he could not spare the whole evening, went in to welcome them or to bring a pithy thought to the subject under discussion. His chief contribution was given by Bible classes which he usually took himself, though for the sessions of 1886 and 1887 Canon Bradby, D.D., took a course on " The History of the Books of the Bible," and in 1890 Dr. Abbott conducted some memorable meetings. Dear to Mr. Barnett's heart was the study of the Bible. In 1881 he wrote to the parishioners : It is impossible to teach the Bible by means of sermons ; the Book must be studied and understood as other books are. Such students would not only find a new literary pleasure, but also learn that religion rests on a firmer base than men's childish memories or emotions. It is a favourite dream of mine that some day such students may meet in church, and together reverently work out the meaning of old words. The " dream " of discussing in church was never carried out, for people were shy, and it is foolish to try to get over two stiles at the same time ; but for years groups of people, chiefly teachers, met either in the Vicarage or Toynbee HaU drawing-rooms and " communed earnestly " together. In these classes difficulties were boldly faced, and though sometimes time was wasted on what people rather boastfully called " doubts " and which could be more truthfully dubbed ignorance, yet that no subject was shirked or tabooed created confidence for those who were reverently seeking light. In 1898 a course on the " Religion of the Hebrews " gave Mr. Barnett opportunity for showing how wonderful was that nation, and how essential is the understanding of the RELIGION ONLY TAUGHT BY THE RELIGIOUS 355 Old Testament to the valuing of the New. The following year lessons on The Pilgrim's Progress surprised those who heard them, as wells of spiritual fancy were opened and imagery deeper than fact explained. Further courses were taken on the Miracles, St. Mark's Gospel, St. Paul's teaching, and the importance of chronology in the evolution of re- ligion. For some of the sessions' work careful syllabuses were prepared. On other occasions Mr. Barnett shortly introduced the subject and invited immediate discussion with a freedom which shocked some good people. From his long experience of teaching religion to chUdren he was able to realise and solve many of the difficulties of teachers, whom he always counselled to teach nothing but what they believed to be true, and neither to trade on children's credulity nor to anticipate their scepticism. On the much debated subject of religious teachmg m the schools he has written : Religious education can only be undertaken by religious persons. They who themselves hear the spirit-voices will teach the children also ; they who know that right is might will be able to make others understand that " right is right, since God is God, and right the day must win ' ' ; they who through Jesus Christ have found peace and joy in union with God will alone be able to preach Him as the Way, the Truth, and the Life. . . Religious education must be trusted to religious people, and what electors should demand from candidates is not pledges about hours and books of instruction, but the assurance that they love truth and goodness, and will choose as teachers men and women who will say what they believe, and do what they know to be right. No one knows, but he and I, of the fruit of these classes, and often I have been thanked for his lessons with such words as : " It is not possible to describe the difference the class has made to me. I see now that there are bigger things than stumbling-blocks, and the children shall be told to see them too." CHAPTER XXVIII " As the workman gets more leisure — not enough to make hitn dull as leisure now makes many of the rich dull — he vnll find excitement in thinking, in beauty, and travel." "It must be clearly borne in mind that the societies are not classes. In them there is neither teacher nor taught. They are groups of men and women who, mterested in the same subjects, meet together to exchange thoughts and obtain information, and appeal especially to those minds who find their happiest exercise not along the beaten track of class lessons, but m self-guided speculation and inquiry." These words explain the Toynbee societies which elected their own officers and met their own expenses, though the Council gave them house-room and hospitality. There were a large number, the following being the most important : Adam Smith Club. Literary Association. Antiquarian Society. Literary and Discussion Society. Art Students' Club. Natural History Society. Athletic Association. Nursing Society. Camera Club. Old Students' Association. Chess Club. Orchestral Society. Economic Club. Philosophical Society. Education Reform League. Popular JIusical Union. Elizabethan Literary Society. Sanitary Aid Society. Ethical Society. Scientific Reading Society. Football Club. Shakespeare Society. Guild of Compassion. Students' LTnion. Leonardo Sketching Club. St. John /Ambulance Brigade. Life-saving Club. Society for helping women and girls. Limehouse and Poplar Students' Swimmmg Club. Union. Teachers' University Association. London Pupil Teachers' Debating Travellers' Club. Society. Vigilance Society. Library Readers' Union. Workmen's Travelling Club. Some of the societies had many members, others but few. Under the wonderful leadership of Mr. G. L. Bruce, that founded in 1886 for the study of natural history numbered 192, and had botanical, geological, and entomological sections. 366 THE TOYNBEE SOCIETIES 357 1892. — Its fortunes have fluctuated. For a time the first enthusiasm fell off, but the last two or three years have seen a great revival. Tliis summer there have been two maui excursions, one in Juno to tlio Now Forest, and one in July to Dartmoor, the former specially for Botany, the latter for Cieology. About twenty went on each excursion and lived in tents for about a week. The cost was 236-. for one and 42.5. for the other. . . Various classes have grown out of the Society, and montlily meetings are lield to liear lectures, see specimens, and foster good fellowship. . . If old members will stiU work hard themselves, and welcome all who are willing to work hard, however little they loiow, the Society will not exist in vain. Seven years later the following programme showed the life and energy of the Natural History Society to be unabated : 1899. — List of Lectures : October 3rd. — " Plant Mosaics," by A. G. Tansley, M.A., F.L.S. November Ith. — " Volcanoes," by A. M. Davies, B.Sc, F.G.S. December 5th. — Entomological paper by J. S. Sequerra, M.E.C.S. January Qth. — President's Address. February Gth. — " Some Pond Life Studies," by D. J. Scourfield. March (jih. — " Bacteria as Friends of Man," by V. H. Blackman, M.A. April lOth. — " The Geological History of Plants," by G. E. Shaw. 3Iay 1st. — " Fruits and Seeds of British Plants," by T. A. Dymes. June 5th.—" The Flora of the Tyrol," by Dr. Stapf. Excursions were arranged to the following places : Brighton Downs, Sevenoaks, Leith Hill, Hayes and Keston, Chingford, Caterham, Redhill, Burnham-on-Crouch, Reigate, Felday (four days Easter), Burnham Beeches, Aylesbury, Loughton, Limpsfield, Chorley Wood, Hayling Island (three days at Whitsuntide), Weybridge, Broxbourne, Chatham, and Switzerland (three weeks). Entrance fee. Is. Annual subscription, la. But no bald facts can express the value of the work of the society or its virile influence on the minds and characters of its members. The Antiquarian Society also was large and active, and an account of its visits to old buildings, papers on brasses, investigations into ancient lore, or enjojmient of disputed points, would fill pages. The value of the societies did not, however, depend on large numbers, and those, whose mem- bers were few, often made up for the interest of excitement, by the closer relationship that exists when " two or three are gathered together." The work of the classes and the societies became very interdependent. Members often joined a society for its social interest, and thereby finding themselves stimulated to desire more knowledge, joined classes ; or else, those who sought knowledge first by direct teaching, and later desired the companionship of others with similar interests, became members of a society. 358 SELF-GOVERNMENT OF SOCIETIES The^musical societies were very energetic and provided music for the social gatherings of other bodies. To Mrs. Aves' and Miss Rosabel Watson's generosity of service AVhitechapel owes the series of classical concerts that were given for nearly thirty years on Sunday afternoons in the lecture-hall. The self-government of the societies led to some interesting experiments, and it is tempting to teU of the work of Mr. R. E. Mitchison and his philosophical followers ; of Mr. A. P. Laurie and his group of seekers after scientific truth ; of Mr. James Bonar and his students of economics, as well as many others. But the temptation has to be resisted, for it is of Mr. Barnett's work that this book has to teU. Of several of the societies he was asked to be President, and for aU he obtained the learned among our friends to give addresses or welcome the members in interesting places. These lecturers we usually entertained at dinner at half- past six, and after coffee in the Toynbee drawing-room and talk with all and sundry, we returned at eight o'clock to the Vicarage- — later the Warden's Lodge- — locked the com- municating doors, and reaUy rested for an hour. At nine o'clock we again took up duty, and for the next hour or so went round the classes, visited the societies, looked in at parties to make short speeches or chat with the guests. We always divided between us what had to be done, and soon after ten o'clock our own drawing-room saw us both again, my little tea-table surrounded by lecturers, Residents, Associates, and old friends who knew we were to be then found. They were delightful opportunities for introductions between delightful people, and wider ever wider became friendship's circles. Public service grew from some of the societies. Thus the Nursing Society- — ninety-one members — stimulated by Mr. W. H. Winny's ceaseless labour, did valuable work, and pioneered some of the plans which have now become recog- nised municipal duties. Ailing children m schools were visited, the sick attending the out-patient dispensaries taught how to obey the doctor's instructions, and a friendly hold kept on aU the convalescents on their return from Erskine House. The Toynbee division of the St. John's Ambulance Brigade also existed to serve. It turned out on aU occasions when crowds were expected, and we felt a thrill of pride when at King Edward's Coronation they received a cheer for their PUBLIC SERVICE OP SOCIETIES 359 smart appearance. Later they carried off the Efficiency Cup presented to the best division in the Metropolitan Corps. The Art Students' Club, under the fostermg care of Mr. and Mrs. T. Hancock Nunn, discovered unexpected talent, fostered deep friendships, and provided not only many opportunities for valumg nature, but also an art-room which enabled students to do quiet work on Sundays, and humbler people to share then pleasure in beauty. The Council reported : 1902. — The Art Room was formed to carry out a hope of Mrs. Barnett, who planned to hold there a sort of picture soiree on Thursday evenings. Talks were arranged, pictures were brought, books were gathered, and some very pleasant evenings were enjoyed. Mrs. Bamett's illness took away her help, and so the plan was not kept up through the whole winter. But enough was done to show that men and women will come to look at pictures and spend quiet hours enjoying the talk of people who can tell their meaning and value. The plan lies waiting for workers. The largest of the Toynbee societies was the Travellers' Club, numbering at its zenith 234 members. It grew out of the resolve we registered in St. Peter's at Rome, to show the St. Jude's workers some of the marvels we were enjojdng. For seven years the seed lay dormant but never forgotten, and when Toynbee Hall was built and Mr. Bolton King whole-heartedly threw his life and work into East London, it became possible to bring it to fruition. Italy was our first goal, and so during the winter of 1887 the would-be travellers heard lectures, saw photographs, and read books on Italy and her history, Florence and her art, Milan and her galleries, and Antwerp and her buildings. Neither were the conditions of the countries passed en route neglected, and we were further instructed on Switzerland's government and Belgium's trade. How well I recall the last meeting of that winter's work, when everyone was bubbling with excitement and we were harangued on minimum baggage, and received one of Mr. Barnett's inimitable addresses on unselfishness in travel. On our return we heard much chaff on that sermonette, it being reported by friends who had seen us in the train crossing the Alps that we were all huddled together in the centres of the carriages, everybody being too unselfish to look out of the windows in case another's view should be intercepted ! However, though that was a fiction, it is true that there could not be a party more possessed with the spirit of helpfulness and camaraderie, or more prolific of jokes. 360 TOYKBEE TRAVELLERS' CLUB We crossed to Antwerp on Tuesday, March 27th, 1888, and after a day spent among its wonders, occupied our special train for the night, and reached Lucerne early in the mornmg. There we were met by the news that an avalanche had fallen on the summit of the St. Gothard pass and that no trains were running. What was to be done 1 Eighty- one tired and homeless travellers, hardly any of whom had left England before ! For a few moments we quailed before this breakdown in the organisation, and then the party was asked to wait, and Mr. Barnett, Mr. Bolton King, Mr. Ward, Mr. Okey, and I went off to the town to find accom- modation. Of course the big noted hotels refused us, but M. Zahringer, of the Hotel des Balances on the Reuss, considered for five minutes and then said : " I give you eighty-one beds and three good meals for seven francs a head, and breakfast can be ready in twenty miniates after the party arrive "■ — and it was ! We blessed that avalanche which enabled not only Lucerne to be enjoyed, but gave us the experience of walking over the blocking snow, and incidentally some fine snow- balling. The " Battle of Brugnasco " the fighters called it, while the gendarme, who solemnly took names and addresses, pronounced it " un incident inoroyable." After a day at Milan we reached Florence and found much welcome. To each of us a ticket was presented franking us into aU the galleries, no slight privilege as it allowed many to revisit favourite pictures or to go for short times unhindered by calculation of francs. Our days were carefully arranged. Every evening after dmner the party, which was accommodated in three hotels, met in the rooms generously lent by Dr. Coldstream, and after lectures from the Dean of Wmdsor,^ Professor Vfilari, or " Vernon Lee," the three-fold programme for the next day was announced by Mr. Bolton King, and the eighty-one asked to select where they would go. Thus all tastes were satisfied. Mr. Barnett and I often led a group, and delightful were the mornings spent in beautiful and sunny surround- ings, with those with whom we had long worked amid dirt and gloom. In the afternoons the whole party was wel- comed by Italian hosts in their charming villas, or made expeditions to see the beautiful country encirclmg Florence. The organisation went without a hitch. Great harmony prevailed among the travellers, among whom bM social classes ^ Archbishop of Canterbury. FIRST JOURNEY TO ITALY 361 were represented. In 1892, when the Toynbee Travellers' Club was fully established, it took out the following list of their members' occupations ; but to our first party more Toynbee Residents were joined ; and a few married friends such as Mr. and Mrs. Michael Sadler, my husband's brother and his wife, and Mr. and Mrs. Bartholomew, went with us and made for serenity. Civil Service : Post Office „ „ Other Departments Clerks and Salesmen Domestic : Married „ Unmarried . Miscellaneous : Architects (2) ; Basket Maker ; Book-binders (2) ; Brush Maker ; Bmlder ; Chemist's Assistant ; Hospital Nurse ; L.S.B. Kindergarten Instructor ; Journalists (2) ; Lecturers (2) ; Librarian ; Printers (2) ; Re- porter ; Sculptor ; Secretary ; Shop- keepers (4) ; SoUoitoi-s (2) ; Solicitors' Clerks (2) ; Watchmaker ; Wood-carver Teachers — London School Board . „ Others . . . . Women. Men. Total — 10 10 . — 8 8 . 3 14 17 . 13 — 13 . 5 — 5 7 23 30 45 16 61 9 — 9 82 71 153 delle Arte del Toynbee Hall di Londra. ^^k0/L^..^A... ^4--:^^ ed alha&SQ^^omponenti la Comitiva del Toynbee Hall li Londra, di visitare gratuimente le Gallerie e Musei ^^ifsnze. /^p. Vahvole fino a 12 Aprile, 1888. m%-i888. JidUi IL^^ Segntario. 1—25 362 TRAVEL TEACHES HUMILITY It was a great pleasure to invite some who could not other- wise have travelled to be our guests, one of whom shall tell her own tale : On February 14th, 1888, I had a letter from Mrs. Bariiett saying that a gentleman had handed £5 to her to help anyone who would like to go to Florence to do so. Would I like to avaU myself of the opportunity ? It would cost about £11. The letter came by the breakfast post. My acceptance was posted by 8.30 and I walked to school — Spitalfields — on air. " I want an extra week's hoUday to go to Italy at Easter," I breathed to the head master. " Italy," he fairly yeUed it, and understanding at last I was going with St. Jude's, he could only murmur very brokenly, " Why don't they take you all up in balloons ? What next ? " The party returned by Pisa, the Genoese Riviera, and Brussels, and arrived in Whitechapel eighteen days after they had started, each £10 6s. Id. the poorer in pocket and richer by iacalculable value ia the things that matter. Soon our experiment of co-operative travelling got into the newspapers, and some wild thmgs were written, to counteract which Mr. Barnett sent a letter to The Spectator, June 23rd, 1888, from which the following is taken : The reign of the industrial spirit in modern life has its glories, but under its sway beauty is destroyed, and the half-milUon of people who inhabit the Tower Hamlets hve tinder a smoke- darkened sky amid depressing surroundings. The compensation which the industrial spirit offers to men for the destruction of those things which enable them to bless God for their creation, is the possibility of travel. If our cities make a " blacker, incessanter hne," and if the calm of our fathers is gone, we have the power they never enjoyed of learning the ways, the thought, the life of other countries. The possibihty is, though, open only to a minority of people. It is only the few who have traditions of travel, and it has never occurred to a Trades-Union to strike for wages which will enable its members to spend an annual holiday abroad. Such a party, however, has a record which is of pubhc interest, and since it has been shown that the impulse which has brought to Whitechapel the best teaching of the Universities is able to carry on the teaching in Florence, it may be fairly asked — " What is the good ? " If the element of generahty be gathered from recollection, the answer might be — " A sense of humility." . . . Brought face to face in Florence with a life which expressed itself in building, in painting, in sculpture, they felt a quickening of brain as they strove to understand this new language and a widening of sympathy as they realised that success cannot FRUITFUL WEEKS 363 always be measured. Arnolfo and Brunelleschi were something else than architects who built houses and churches to make money. Giotto, Fra Angelico, and Alichelangelo were clearly moved by some other force than the desire to do a picture business. A party of EngUsh people might bo content to be ignorant of the names of artists so long as they hold artists to be mere decorators obedient to the fancies of their paymasters ; but in Florence, where art may be seen to be part of life, there can be no such content with ignorance. Questions were eagerly put as to the life of the men. It is humiUating for those who believe that all thought can be expressed by the printing-press, and all action represented by the steam-engine, to confess that men who thought as clearly as themselves and did great deeds in their day, found the expression of their thought and action in Art. it is humihating to see that a factor is left out m our system of the universe. And at Florence many of our party reahsed that in their system they had left out Art. They were humbled by the new hght, and perhaps also by the revelation that there are heights above the nineteenth century. Of the value of what Mr. Barnett said, as he told un- affectedly his thoughts of the world's masterpieces, I had an evidence the other day, when the Rev. G. Hudson Shaw, lecturing at the Hampstead Garden Suburb Institute on " Mediseval Florence," startled me by attributing his care for art to that Italian visit. " To me those three weeks were more fruitful than my four years at Oxford," sounded like exaggeration, but from others has come similar testimony, and only last week I saw a letter from Mr. J. Beck Forman who told his news- paper readers of his recollections of Orcagna's picture in the Campo Santo at Pisa as seen twenty-eight years ago with Canon Barnett " of revered memory." On several occasions Mr. Barnett and I joiaed the T.T.C. tours, and in 1892 we took responsibility for a party of thirty-nine, and had a glorious visit to Venice, Verona, Munich, and Cologne. As time went on the T.T.C. grew strong and vigorous, organised long and ambitious tours, and issued voluminous reports : 1892. — The Toynbee Travellers' Club has ventured on three excursions this year, the innovation being one at Whitsuntide to Paris, the special aim being to study objects connected with the French Revolution of 1789, and to the guidance of M. Emile Corra, who possesses an unrivalled know- ledge of the topography of the Revolution, the party was greatly indebted. Thirty-four took part in the excursion, and stayed away for nine days at an average cost of £4 93. 6d. per head. About forty-five joined the summer 3G4 DISSOLUTION OF T.T.C. Hwias party ; and at Easter 1892 a party of fifty-five went to Rome for what proved to be one of the most successful expeditions as yet organised by the Club. They were absent eighteen days at a cost of £13 8s. Id. per head. 18'J7. — Ihe Toynbee Travellers, happy ia then years of wandering, have signalised the year 189ti by an enterprismg and successful Expedition to Iceland, and Easter of 1897 by another to Spam. Our grandfathers would have rubbed their eyes on bemg told that the cost of the latter for twenty- four days was £lb 15s., and perhaps they would have been stiU more surprised at the expedition at Whitsuntide when eight days were spent ia Normandy at a cost of £4 7s. 3d, The periodic meetiags ia the Toynbee drawing-room were pleasant occasions when old friends met, heard new ex- periences, cemented friendships, and enjoyed the club's reaUy splendid trophies. For twenty-iive years the club lived, and then formally dissolved itself, at its annual general meetiQg, October 23rd, 1913. At first it kept its original intention of providing co-operative travel for those who were studying together, but later the voting decided to open the club to elected outsiders. From that time it lost its chief significance, and in spite of Mr. Thomas Okey's, Mr. A. C. Hajrward's, and Mr. F. V. Tmpia's splendid gifts of service, the progress of its barque was not without storms. Through all its vicissitudes Mr. Barnett remained the club's President and its friend, though his faithfulness forced him to action which sometimes strained the relation- ship, as, for instance, when the club claimed the right to invite to its meetings anyone it fancied, even persons of tarnished reputation, forgetful that it was itself only the guest of Toynbee HaU, which was supported by philanthropic funds ; or when it refused to welcome as club members men and women of humbler social status, or to share the collection of books, photographs, or other treasures which had accrued to it from the help of many, not always self-obtamed, friends. All these difficulties have gone and need not be remembered, except that they serve to illustrate much of Mr. Barnett's work which was not a sequence of triumphal initiations, achievements, and successes, but frequently a series of disappointments in people or failures in plans, com- peUing acceptance of an upward path strewn with barriers, often created by trivial conventions or class snobbery- — the last most active among those whose generous impulses had been warped in the struggle to raise themselves. To the end of the T.T.C. 's life the relations were harmonious and the memory of a June river excursion is f uU of pleasure : WORKIIEN'S TRAVELLING CLUB 365 To Mrs. F. G. B., June 22nd, 1909.— On Saturday we joined the Toynbee Travellers, who kept their 21st birthday at Hampton Court. There were 215, and many of the Florence party whom yoxi would remember. We wore all very happy together in renewing memories. Bolton King was there. We both felt very strongly that the advantages of travel sliould not be limited to any class, and therefore in December 1902 the Toynbee Workmen's Travelling Club was founded by Mr. H. R. Maynard and Mr. Thomas W. Glare. It was an indirect result of a Trades Union conference, and in reporting its intention the Toynbee Report said : 1903. — ^Partly because workmen have not secured holidays of periods but only holidays of days, partly because travel seems to involve too much adventure and money, they turn aside from proposals to spend a week or ten days on the Continent as something not for them. Ignorant that foreign travel is as easy as home travel, and that the expense of a visit to the Continent is probably less than that of a week at Margate. Though it aimed at foreign travel, the Workmen's Travel- ling Club did not neglect Saturday visits to places of interest in or near London, and whole-day excursions on Whit Mondays to Oxford and Cambridge. It also visited Brussels and Antwerp, Paris and Rouen ; parties of thirty to forty men leaving London on the Thursdays before Easter and returning on the following Tuesdays. In 1913 I vras honoured by being elected President of the club, and greatly hoped in 1914 to have gone to Normandy with its members, but ill-health prevented, and a long afternoon that they kindly spent with me in the Garden Suburb was but a poor substitute. It was not only for those who joined the classes or societies that higher education was provided. Every Saturday the beautifully panelled lecture-haU was freely opened to any- one who cared to listen to the distinguished men who " responded with alacrity to the invitation to come " and speak to an audience that represented no political party, no religious organisation, and whose manners and clothing gave evidence that all classes in East London were present. It was no small j)rivilege to be introduced to mysteries new and old by those who brought for our histruction the results of their life's labours. Mr. Barnett often told his brother of his pleasure in the lectures : 366 TOYNBEE LECTURES October 23rd, 1885. — Last Saturday Lubbock gave a lecture. Most interesting was it to hear of the ants. They are our brothers and sisters, and in some way have higher developments. Per- haps indeed they have another sense which understands those vibrations which he between the 1,300 which we hear and the millions which we see. February 23rd, 1897. — In the evening Haweis lectured on " Music, the Art of the Age," a lecture which in one way was a model. It held the people by making them tingle with mirth while he poured in thoughts. March IQth, 1897. — On Saturday Sir Francis Grenfell lectured on Egypt. It is always good to meet and hear men who have done brave things and he told the tale simply. On Sunday Dr. Fairbairn lectured on Luther. He is a man of whom I hold a very high opinion. He is a clear thinker and has a gift of lan- guage. Better than this he feels, and he fetched the audience while he let them into the forces which were at work behind what we call the Reformation. On Tuesday Herkomer lectured to a room full of teachers, on "Art-teaching," and made them sit up while he told how the present system failed and what system was possible. He would set children to draw, then eliminate those obviously unfit, then teach the others by letting them see their teacher work, and calling on them to do original work. Ait is, I suppose, the stimulating and the restraining of the imagination, the teaching of the sense of proportion. If this be so, how practically im- portant it is, and how good art teaching would prevent, on one side narrowness and extravagance, on the other side indifference. These are the sins of all time. December llth, 1897. — As our lecturer we had Mrs. Humphry Ward, who in exquisite EngUsh gave us a paper on the " Peasant in the Novel " — a most interesting survey of 2,000 years, in which by quotations she showed how the peasant character had been illustrated, culminating in the books of the present day, of which she put Cole's Iceland Fishers at the top. 1890. — Lord Herschell lectured and was splendid. He did not preach, but he dug round all the arguments and the manner of life they showed, till everyone was, unknown to himself, changed. That is the way to preach, but what shrewdness of thought and what self-abnegation it shows ! To-night Lord Brassey comes to dine. We get too many lords. MR. MARCONI'S INVENTION 367 The Toynbee Council also report some interesting oc- casions : 1886. — The Saturday popular lectures throughout the winter, which have been given by persons as eminent in their various spheres as Lord Wolseley, Mr. Tom Hughes, Mr. Lewis Morris, and Mr. Farmer, Sir John Lubbock, Sir Walter Beaant, Mr. Romanes, and Mrs. Fawcett, have been well attended. Professors Seeley, Norman Lockyer, Gardiner, Tylor, Burdon Sanderson, have also responded with alacrity to our invitations to instruct or entertain a Whitechapel audience, and Mr. John Farmer has delivered lectures on the teaching of music to the Board School masters of the neighbourhood. I well recall my husband's enthusiastic description of Mr. Marconi's new discovery, which was first publicly shown in our lecture-haU. " It will bring mankind together," he said, " and make for peace and goodwill." The Westminster Gazette described the occasion- — Decem- ber 12th, 1896 : Mr. W. H. Preece, the telegraphic expert of the Post Office, had a sur- prise in store for his audience at Toynbee HaU on Saturday night, when he lectured, under the presidency of Canon Barnett, on " Telegraphy without Wires." . . . Towards the close of his lecture he announced that a Mr. Marconi, a young Italian electrician, came to him recently with a system of telegraphy without wire, depending not on electro-magnetic but on electrostatic effects — that is to say, on electric waves set up of a much higher rate of vibration, 250,000,000 a second in fact. These vibrations were projected through space in straight lines, and could be reflected and refracted like light. . . Mr. Marconi was present that night, and this was the first occasion on which the apparatus had been shown, except to the Government officials. . . The apparatus was then established. What appeared to be just two ordinary boxes were stationed at each end of the room, the current was set in motion at one, and a beU was immediately rung in the other. " To show that there was no deception ' ' Mr. Marconi held the receiver and carried it about, the bell ringing whenever the vibrations at the other box were set up. Mr. Preece said he had had the greatest possible pleasure in telling Mr. Marconi that day that the Post Office had decided to spare no expense in experimenting with the apparatus, and one of the first trials would be from Penarth to an island in the Channel. He might add that he had the greatest faith in the apparatus. If the experiments were successful, it would be of inestimable value to our ships, for it would provide an easy way of communicating with lightships and lighthouses. Neither day nor night made any difference, neither rain nor snow would interfere with them, and if the invention was what he believed it to be, our mariners would have been given a new sense and a new friend which ■would make navigation infinitely easier and safer than it now was. 368 THURSDAY EVENING DEBATES We were really very grateful to aU these public-spirited and delightful people who shared their best thoughts with our neighbours, but sometimes I fear we forgot to say so. " The odd part of it is," said Canon Ainger to a mutual friend, " that the Barnetts rarely thank you, but take it for granted that you should come and give gratis what you usually receive a useful cheque for ; but then they live there, and we only go for an evening once a year. That is their pull." At the Saturday and Sunday lectures the audience were not expected to speak, but on Thursday evenings they were encouraged to debate. As long ago as 1879 Mr. Barnett and Mr. James Bryce had begun the plan in relation to their work with the Liberal Three Hundred- — in the hope of teaching the voters what they were voting about. The " Literary and Discussion Society," as it was then called, met in our small, dark, up-the-passage school- rooms ; but when Toynbee was built, it moved into the lecture-hall. From the beginning it attracted a class of men who rarely attended lectures, and the mtroduction of the soothing but hardly fragrant pipe resulted in keeping women out, and bringing in the audience for whom the debates were arranged. Of these debates the Toynbee Report said : 1898. — A reproach sometimes levelled at Toynbee Hall, that it caters rather for the " middle " than for the " working " class, does not applj^, at least, to the Debates. It is, of course, true that the " middle class " is predisposed to swallow with avidity whatever it believes to represent the culture of the upper ten thousand, while the working man allects rather a distant independence that is easily mistaken for hostility. At any rate, it is certain that at our debates we meet the genuine British working man (not merely those of the poorer class), and perhaps a large enough selection (for the weekly audience averages 200 to 250) to enable us to judge of his views and ideals, his knowledge and his prejudices. . . Though the bulk of the audience is Radical in sympathies, very few evenings have passed without the discussion having a real educational value, making it clear to those who were present that most questions are many-sided. On the whole, these evenings have been a great success ; the audiences have been large and rightly composed, the temper good, and the discussions keen ; the debates have earned a good reputation for their fairness, their interest, their value, and, on the whole, their thorough- ness. Descriptions of a few of these evenings are worth re- printing, all the more because they are dated twenty-seven years ago : o H K o VALUE OF FREE DEBATE 369 1889. — Our first debate this season took place on October 3rd, when Mr. Ben Tillett introduced " The Future of the Dockers' Union." The hall was crowded to overflowing with the " dockers," flushed by their recent victory. Great enthusiasm prevailed, and the success of the Union is assured if the men remain in their present frame of mind. 1889. — ^Mr. George Smith, of Coalville, opened a debate on " Gipsies and Tramps." Again our hall was crowded to excess. Much amusement was caused by one of the debaters, a tramp who related his experiences of many casual wards. He said it was im.possible to get a day's work after spending a night in the workhouse, as the task work to be done kept one too late on the foUowing morning. He also referred to the disheartening effect of some of the work, and related a case in point where (at Yarmouth) casuals had to shovel ballast through a hole, and when they had finished they were marched round and told to shovel it back again. Surely we might learn something of the dignity of labour from the " casual " view. 1889. — A very crowded gathering fiUed the haU to overflowing, showing the great interest which East London takes in the subject of " Sugar Bounties," which Mr. David Martineau opened. He tried very hard, with all his special knowledge, to prove that the imposition of a duty on bounty-fed sugar would not increase its price, and that this imposition was in thorough accord with the principles of free trade. . . The audience, however, would have none of this ; they would not be persuaded mto refusing the bounties which foreign nations taxed themselves to give us. The history of the debates was a chequered one. Some- tunes it seemed useless to provide a meeting-place where rank rubbish was talked by the audience, but then again there was always the three-quarters of an hour during which everyone listened to an expert, and there were the twenty minutes when in reply he again showed wisdom. Also there was the large body of silent listeners ; and the gradual development of a conscience of what was or was not ad- visable to be said. The tone of the meeting was a sensitive thermometer to public events, and my husband was more than once urged at periods of social unrest to withdraw the opportunities of meeting, but his conviction that good was stronger than evil prevailed, and he never closed the de- bates. He used to argue also that the very violence of some of the speakers' enmity towards law and right would, by the principle of opposition, result in making others defend, if only mentally, what had been attacked. The subjects of the lectures and debates and the names of those who dealt with them for two, and sometimes three, evenings a week for twenty-two years, are too many to be given; but knowing that my readers can always skip, it gives me pleasure to set out the names of some who rendered 370 LIST OF SOME WHO SERVED this service to those whose lives had little of what was best. Each person is mentioned but once, though in many cases the name covers annual visits. 1890. Ben Tillett . Earl Compton, M.P. H. H. Asquith, M.P ,, Lord Balfour of Bur leigh . ,, Lord Monteagle ,, Montague Crackan thorpe, Q.C. ,, Canon WUberforce 1891. Sir H. C. Cunning- liam R. B. Haldane, Q.C. M.P. „ SirSydneyWaterlow „ Hon. Bernard Coleridge, M.P. . „ Herbert Burrows „ Henry Cuninghame. „ Misa Beatrice Potter 1892. Hon. E. Lyulph Stanley " The Future of the Dockers' Union." " Housing of the V\''orkuig Classes." " The House of Lords." " Leasehold Enfranchisement." " Irish Land Purchase." " State Socialism." " Total Abstinence or Moderate Drinking." " Has English Government helped India ? " " The Law of Combination and Conspiracy." " Hospitals, Voluntary or State ? " " International Trades' Unions." " Socialism and the Unemployed." " London Coal Dues." " Sweating." " The School Board Election." R. T. Beid, Q.C, M.P. " Rate-supported Free Libraries.' ,, Mrs. Fawcett. „ Stepniak „ C. Howard Vincent, M.P. . „ J. A. Spender ,, H. L. W. Lawaon 1893. B.F.CosteUoe,L.C.C. „ J.Murray Macdonald, M.P. . „ Tom Maim . „ Lord Monkswell, L.C.C. Prof. Stuart, M.P. . ,, W. H. Dickinson, L.C.C. „ J. Fletcher Moulton, Q.C. . 1895. Cyril Jack son, M.L.S.B. . „ Henry Ward, L.C.C. „ J. Williams Benn, M.P., L.C.C. „ Alderman Beaoh- croft, L.C.C. 1896. T. J. Macnamara, M.L.S.B. . 1^ Herbert Samuel " Justice and Expediency." " The Russian Crisis." " United Empire Trade." "Pension Schemes for Old Age." " Ought Canada to Join the United States 7 " " London Taxation." " The Eight Hours' Day." " Docks and Dockers." " Alien Immigration." " University Teaching for Workmen." " London Government." " Our Occupation of Egypt." " Truant and Industrial Schools." " The County Council Election." " The Working Man in America." " Communications with the Suburbs." " The People's Schools." " Liberalism and Social Reform," SUBJECTS DISCUSSED 371 1896. Sir Edward Grey, Bart. . 1897. Wm. Crooks, L.C.C. Hon. W. P. Reeves „ Corrie Grant . 1898. Fred Rogers . 1899. L. A. Atherley Jones, Q.CM.P. . „ Mrs. Garrett Ander son, M.D. . ,, Earl of Portsmouth 1900. J. St. Loe Strachey „ Major Leonard Dar win . „ J. A. Simon . 1901. Hilaire Belloo ,, Dadabhai Naoroji ,, Fabian Ware . F. W. Hirst . ,, Sir W. Wedderbum Edgar Foa . 1902. J. Ramsay Mac donald „ The Bishop of Step ney . 1903. Edward R. Pease ,, Dr. Farquharson, M.P. . ,, Percy Alden . „ G. Bernard Shaw 19U4. C. R. Buxton ,, W. H. Beveridge 1905. Sir John Gorst.K.C. M.P. . „ George Lansbury " British Foreign Policy." " The Armenian Difficulty." " Labour Legislation for New Zealand." " The Secrecy of Diplomatic Negotiations is no longer Desirable." " Labour Movement, and ' The Man Out- side.' " " The Foreign Policy of England." " The History and Influence of Vaccination." " Arbitration in Labour Disputes." " The Transvaal Crisis and Future of the British Empire." " Municipal Trading." " The Price of Imperialism." " Co-operation and Collectivism." " The Condition of India." " Secondary Education." " The Budget as it Ought to be." " Indian Famines.'' " International Arbitration." " Labour Representatives in the ' House.' " " Citizenship in East Loudon." " Shall we AboKsh the London School Board ? " " Must Britain take a Back Seat ? " " Arbitration and Conciliation." " That the Working Classes are Useless, Dangerous, and Ought to be Abolished." " The Macedonian Question." " Trade Union Legislation." " The Rights of Children." " The Unemployed." St. Jude's also enjoyed similar privileges, for before Toynbee Hall existed, and when the httle schools were our only meeting-place, old lists show that in 1880 we were lectured by : Alfred MUner. Rev. C. W. Stubbs Arnold Toynbee Rev. E. C. Hawkins Professor Bryoe , " The State and the Duties of Rulers.' " The Education of Life." " The State and Religion." " Women and War." " True Democracy." 372 "MUSTER'S MERRY SPEECH" In whatever branch the students worked they were able to meet in the Students' Union, a large and living organisa- tion which iacluded them all. It was founded the year before Toynbee Hall was buUt, and has had so many children that its inception and birthday deserve to be chronicled. . . I give aU my husband's letter in which he tells me of it, because it shows the sides of his nature not usually con- nected with education, but without which the education he advocated would have been a meaner, weaker product. To H. 0. B., January IQth, 1883.— The day is over. I feel wonderfully well, vigorous, and more satisfied with myself than I have felt for a long time. Last night we had a very jolly party. About sixty University Extension students came. I addressed them. Text being " Alice Hart " and expansion being " Thoroughness." The text was insjiiring, and on the whole I believe I did well. There must be more of such meetings ; if thus we can weld the students together, the classes may go better. This morning I preached and new Hfe went into old words as I showed people what religion had to do with life. In the after- noon Gell came. His speech was too sermony. He is a Joke. He missed j^our presence by the appearance of the drawing-room. "Make it like her," said I. Then he began kicking the chairs over and putting things out of shape. Quite sure he could do it. I roared at him and said I would tell his " Gossip " his idea of her taste. He will come and dine with you on Saturday if you ^nW ask him. Mr. and J.Irs. S came to tea. He is a fair and thin-looking man, a remnant of a Stubbs. His wife loves him, so there must be something in him. He preached a simple sermon on abhorring evil. There was a very good congregation, quite 200 people I should say. A month later, I being stUl away Ul, my husband wrote : To H. 0. B., February 25th, 1883.— Milner brought his cousni to the party, so would not come to dinner. The party was a capital one ; about eighty real students came and we formed a Students' Union. Milner made one of the merriest of speeches. The people enjoyed him. Nme jrears after this " merry speech," Mr. Barnett, writing of the Students' Union, which then took in about sixty per cent, of those attending the courses, societies, and classes, said ; THE STUDENTS' UNION 373 1892. — The students of the University Extension Classes early discovered the power of Tiiiion. Long ago when they met m St. Judo's^ School they realised^ the need; of the enthusiasm which grows among those who tallc together of their aims, of the widen- ing interest which follows the contact of diherent muids, of the bond wliich holds together those who learn to know one another. A Union whose members should meet frequently at conver- saziones, and dui'ing the summer join in excm'sions, was therefore formed, with a nominal fee. it can show a good record of work. Parties in TojTibee ilall, annual excursions to either Oxford or Cambridge, visits to parks and gardens of country friends, and many rambles. There are few Saturdays when the students of the Union do not meet to encourage one another. . . By these and other means the way of the student is made easier, and a body of opinion is being created, which ought in tune to compel the careless to study. To help the Students' Union to obtain these pleasures, Mr. Bamett used aU our friends, and Mr. Boyle, who acted as his secretary for eight of the years under review, re- members hundreds of letters that were written on the subject. Cordial replies came to the requests, and the Students' Union, under the efScient management of Mr. Monk and Miss WHd, took abundant advantages of their opportunities. The leading artists invited its members to their studios, and at beautiful houses both in town and in the country they were welcomed " by request." Ever- hospitable Oxford gave them generous entertainment, and people of world-wide repute, such as Mrs. Humphry Ward, Mr. Anthony Hope, Mr. Frederic Harrison, Mr. Leslie Stephen, Sir Sidney Lee, Sir Henry Roscoe, Mr. Oscar Brownuig, Mr. William Morris, Sir A. Gonan Doyle, shared with them their literary or artistic harvests. Each year also the Students' Union went touring, sometimes for four or five days' jaunts at Easter or Whitsun in England, some- times on the Continent. To Mr. Barnett aU this was wholly good, but I was not so happy at so much hospitality being lavished on men and women just because they had jomed a class and paid Is. a year towards its social side. It was different when the members were teachers who by enriched minds imcon- sciously enriched those of their pupils; but to expend so much work and to use up so much influence to provide social eveniags and Saturday outings for clerks, shop assistants, factory foremen, and sons and daughters of "74 THE GUILD OP COMPASSION tradesmen seemed to me but a new form of pauperising, especially for a class never backward in obtaining pleasure. " If they would each do more public service it v/ould be aU right," I would argue to my husband, " but the majority accept aU and give nothing." " They wiU learn the joy of giving when they know more," he would reply. " At least m a small way luxuries are being nationalised." Perhaps he was right. He usually was, but I felt that, in any case, the opportunity of service for others should be offered to those who themselves were being served so generously. One afternoon in 1898 Mrs. Winkworth was entertaining the Union ; the apple blossom was out, and the gardens and tennis lawns were aglow with May sunshme, abetting by their lavish beauty our hostess, whose hospitality mcluded the sharing of her home treasures as well as much dainty food. As I sat in the verandah I told a few of my women friends what I thought. " Can you wait here," said Miss Wild and Miss Hicklmg, " whUe we all go and fetch some of the others, and then will you say again to them what you have just said to us ? " Each messenger brought back a few friends until a little crowd had gathered, and to them all I told of the workhouse wards where the aged sat day after day joyless, without duties or interests, waiting for death ; of the rough girls whose whole lives could be transfigured by the gift of some months' training ; of ailing little children who could be received into the country and made stronger if they could be cleaned and planned for ; of the need for service in countless ways that were not dramatic nor even interesting. Then I said, too, though it required some tact — ^for while one pleaded for those who suffered, one had to avoid causing the suffering of offence — that the Students' Union was ever receivmg hospitality without even proposmg to offer the sacrifice of time, strength, or money involved in making a return. How could any of those present give Mrs. Wink- worth pleasure ? It was not possible, but it was possible to accept her gifts and pass them on. This talk founded the"Toynbee Guild of Compassion." Its name was perhaps more fanciful than I should have selected, but from the first hour that the ladies met in the Warden's Lodge drawing-room, they governed the society, and from it many sad lives have been gladdened and ennobled. UNPRETENTIOUS LOVING LABOURS 575 The necessary funds were obtained by a large working party of the students which met every Tuesday evening, be the weather cold or hot, wet or dry, and the work under- taken by the Guild rapidly grew, until it mcluded : {a) A Training Home for Girls. (b) Clothing and preparing the inmates of a home for sick children supported by a friend, (o) Flower Shows in the Toynbee Quad. (d) Small parties of old workhouse women taken to spend afternoons in friends' houses. (e) " At Homes " to old men and women long ago cast as useless on the rubbish-heap of humanity. (/) Concerts and entertainments given in the wards of asylums or infirmaries. (g) Small groups of children taken for rambles. (h) Monthly meetings of the convalescents and girls who had been in Erskine House. All unpretentious labours, not undertaken to reorganise society, but to uplift or comfort a few who had " fallen by the way," and all salted by the sacrifice of time and force, given by those whose self-support demanded most of both. To the Guild my husband rendered the sustaining sympathy he offered to each of my duties, taking the chair when I was Ul, and always putting in an appearance and buying what no one else wanted at the sales the sewing party held. Mr. Barnett believed that every society should aim at so bettering conditions that it should extinguish itself, and he gave twenty years as the legitimate limit of a charitable society's life. The Guild of Compassion has nearly reached that limit, and it still lives its kind life. Are social conditions worse, or do I feel them more be- cause, after thirty-three years in Whitechapel, I now live alone amid the beauty of the Hampstead Garden Suburb ? I cannot teU, but never did I so realise the cruel kindness of the poor-law system than when I helped twenty-two old ladies out of the brake which had brought them from the Whitechapel workhouse to my door. Ugly and uniform clothing ; sterile and forbidding faces ; gauche and sus- picious manners ; silent and antagonistic attitude to each other — but who can wonder if love flags among those who are herded together without individual interests ? My neighbours had as usual been kind, and came each to take two guests, so that at least for one afternoon they should be addressed by their names and asked it they liked sugar: 376 THE NATION'S UNPAID TEACHERS in their tea. And in the evening they came back, arm in arm with their hostesses, whose gardens had paid toll, their faces softened, enlivened, their ways gentler, their hearts fuU of gratitude. Good God ! what a difference — and these are our nation's old folk who have been taught life's lessons by toU and sacrifice. These arc the unpaid teachers of consideration, pity, self-control, wanted by grand-children in numberless houses, and we shove them all together out of sight, and mto barrack wards. Why? Why ? Oh ! because rent is so dear. LETTERS, 1886 TO 1895 These letters have been selected from an enormous correspondence. In some cases I have united passages from more than one letter, in others only portions are printed, but the date sequence has been carefully preserved. They have all been chosen to illustrate my husband's work or to show some trait in his character. St. Jtjde's Vicaeage, Whitechapel, 1886. My deab Feai^k, We have seen a good deal of Seeley. He is good company but a bit vaia. He sums up Gladstone's character as essentially Catholic, and so considering truth to be " what is everjrwhere believed," viz. the old Catholic doctrine. When I said " the worship of the jumping cat," his answer was, " Yes, Gat hohc." Joking apart, he does suggest a key to the strength and weak- ness of G.O.M. . . AU minds are occupied by Home Rule. I keep firm to the principle, but I distrust Gladstone ; he is such a manager some- how. I should hke a Resolution carried and his Bill sent back. Days are coming when the beUevers in a future must act and speak. There are many signs of the decline of Rome in our midst, and those who see that there is a future better than any past, must grapple with it and make it understood. The sad thing of all crises is the way in which good people use their strength in trying to restore the old. . . I can't help thinking that there is a better time within reach, that now, as at the Renaissance, England might ride on the new things to greatness, but then one is so bothered by the moral cowardice. We have the weakness of wealth and the rich must always find it hard to do any good. . . On Tuesday I met Goschen and talked about University Extension. He is able and halting. The habit of halting makes him sure when he has time. In the Kingdom where weeks are months he will be first. . . On Thursday Ritchie of L.G.B. sent for me apropos of my Nincteariih Ccvlury article, " Rehef Funds and the Poor." We had a good talk, but officiahsm may be so tight that outside pressure may make for a return of out-relief. 1—26 377 378 LETTERS. 1886 A mysterious parcel came yesterday from a man on Canon's Marsh, Bristol. My wife says it is a clip for the reins and holds it to be a mark of your sweet thoughtfulness. We cannot, though, fit it on, so you must come up for the purpose of showing us ! We had a lovely drive yesterday round Stanmore and Harrow, keeping out for six hours. The day was a poem, and we took in stores of rest as we jogged alone far from cares and friends. Love for ever, S. A. ii. St. Jude's Vicarage, Whiteci-iapbl, 18S7. My deae Frank, We have been spending our Sabbath with Lord Dunsany. He is near eighty and a dear^ — intelligent, active, and liberal. He despairs of Ireland but is not bitter. As out of his experience he tells of efforts — plans which have failed, one joins in his hopelessness, but is assured that the only experiment left for trial is that of Home Rule. . . [J,: On Monday we went to Watts ; he finished my portrait and gave it to my wife. She is very pleased and the face is certainly like something in me. He was very happy ia her pleasure, and she was very happy in her possession. On Tuesday we dLned with the Courtneys, and greatly enjoyed our talk. He is a strong man and they make a beautiful home together. On Wednesday we went in the morning to the Kew Gallery. The pictures are distressing : there is hardly one with any poetry ; most of them are afiected and the voice of all is " Vanity of vanities." It is terrible to think of the passion which speaks out of the walls of Florence, and then to see pretence, the mockery of passion on our walls. The warriors are stage warriors and the lovers have got up their looks from pictures. In the after- noon we went to a garden party and heard Corney Grain. Have you heard him ? He is very clever hitting off the little weak- nesses of little people. It is strange to watch folk laughing at themselves; people seem so vain that they would rather be laughed at than not noticed. Rich people differ here from the poor, who hate notice. Vanity is a strange outcome of civilisa- tion—a result, I take it, of a free press and empty minds. . . Last night we went to the House. Y sat next to Mrs. Gladstone, a commonplace old lady, and confided to her that she did not like Harcourt's speech. " Then you are the other side ? " she said. " No," replied my wife ; " but I can't think my side perfect always." " Ah, then you must come and hear him [Mr. Gladstone] on Monday," she said. Harcourt's speech was detestable, the speech of a spendthrift politician using up to-day what will be wanted to-morrow to LETTERS, 1887 379 keep society together. We saw the row and I don't think the Speaker will last long ; he clearly was inconsistent, and should have shut up Sanderson. The latter is Irish, a man to speak more vigorously than he acts, a man loving effect, a man who would any day sacrifice truth for a joke. We came away sad that the pulse of the machine should be so frivolous, and ashamed of what other nations must think. There is no argument against coercion except Home Rule. Gladstone was in the House, a nervous irritable man, conscious of every reflection on himself. I can't think how he has hved so long, wearing himself down as he does. . . My lady's book looks very well, and is the ground- work of many of to-day's articles. She is all right and has endured well a very heavy week. With dearest love, S. A. B. St. Jude's Vioabage, Whitechapel, July 2nd, 1887. My dear Fbank, The weekly letter becomes the birthday letter. Instead of telling you about the past I have to throw myself into the future, see you growing to the dignity fit for the Abbey House, increasing in prosperity and goodness, sheltered and supported by the love of many. Dear old boy, may all good be yours, good withia and good without. My wife, as usual remembering everything, thought of you and will send you some art- worked brass plates for decoration of the Hall for your birthday. One thing will, I fear, be missing to- morrow, and that is the raspberry and currant tart along the series of which my memory leaps, and I am borne to Samber House, sea-side lodgings, and even Portland Square. We picture you in your new house — excited — a bit worried, but full of hope. The house must look its best with this sun, and to-morrow you will begin to feel you are married to the Cathedral. Did you ever read Victor Hugo's Notre Dame ? There a chOd got, weirdly, strangely, to belong to the great silent home of the living and the dead. Dear people, our thoughts will be with you all next Simday, and oh ! how we hope that your home may be blessed and how the sacrifice may bear fruit to many ! Can't you think of a motto for your hall, which shall be nothing to the blind but which to those who can see shall declare that man's work, like God's work, is to be shared, and that all honest comers will come to you ? What a lot still lies before you, and how much to be done to make yoiw gift of residence in the city among the people perfect I With dearest love, S. A. B. 380 LETTERS, 1887 Red, Norway, Jrdy Z\st, 1887. My deab Feai^k, " When it is fine we see the waterfalls, and when it is wet we see the waters fall." In fact, wet and fine alters only the posi- tion of an " s." Thus Ward describes Norway and there is more in the description than is at first apparent. Water is the making of everything ; the pleasure of the tourist and the living of the people depend on the water, and both soon get careless of wet. You would have been astonished to see us both at 5 a.m. on the deck of a steamer wrapped in waterproofs enjoying the rain ; and you would be glad to see us both blooming in health, trudging our twelve or eighteen miles, and eating and drinking whatever we can find — eggs, fish, beer. You would hke the people, the honest and just-awake look of the men, with their reserve of strength, the simple, broad- browed girls armoured in purity. You would hke their gentle- ness to animals — we have not seen a driver strike a horse — and the method of driving seems to be to let the horse follow his own taste, drink when he hkes, stop when he hkes, and run when he likes. As he hkes to run down hill and as the hUls are very steep, we descend with a flash. You would enjoy the rapid movement from place to place, the welcome at the hotels, and always the most lovely and inspiring surroundings. Sometimes a steamer bears us for a whole day in and out the windings of the fiords. The rocks shut us in on every side, and sympathy with the people who live wherever, from sea or rocks, a living can be scraped, makes us almost melancholy. We have a sense of the might of nature, of a might greater than man's, and we remember how if we did not love one another we should go mad for very weakness' sake. Sometimes during one day we pass by the side of torrents which rush and roar tUl they lose themselves in a waterfall, climb ravines where every rock is radiant with green, reach heights when we see hill rolling on hill, or stand by plains or lakes beyond which rest the snow mountains or glaciers. It is the last view which I hke best. I like the sense that earth and heaven meet, that the rough at our feet belongs to the peaceful distance, that man by going may reach the skies. My wife, I think, likes best the torrents, as they roll and rage in. volumes greater than the Avon. She likes their life, their will to achieve, their pro- gress, till in a glorious death at some fall they fill the world mth a sense of power and beauty. . . The journey so far has been a success, the necessary effort refreshes our wills and reminds us that we are not old. M^e camiot be old to enjoy riding in a coster's barrow without springs, and with no harness but a bit of rope. We cannot be old to giggle with our fellow-travellers over the difficulties to be under- stood by the people. . , LETTERS, 1887 381 Our experience of our party is very satisfactory. We two have been alone and yet not alone. In the traps called stolkjars, we drive for hours, and then when we meet our fellow-travellers we are sure of a talk, sure of thoughtful care, sure that some sign of unselfishness will be pleasant. Ward is the practical man who plans journeys, fixes times, and delights in the thing done. Shields is the mystic who sees coincidences, believes in ideas. " How many pounds avoirdupois can an angel's wings lift?" asks Ward. " A feather weight," answers Shield. " America," says M'ard, " is the last product of civilisation." " Its highest product," retorts Shields, " is the railway-station." Bartholomew is the paymaster, and he is glad when he takes as a receipt the handshake of landlord or waitress. . . To-day we are spending quietly on a lake which much reminds us of Lucerne, only here there are no visitors, no arrangement for tourists, and no heat. I am writing by an open window and the air blows from a glacier across the still shadowed waters. My wife is very well. I need not tell you that she is the life of the party, opening our eyes to see the beauty and making us think of all we see. Goodbye now, our thoughts and talk often go to you and yours. May you have a good hohday ! With love for ever, S. A. B. Whitechapel, 1887. To H. 0. B. Here is a bit of good news. There was a clerical meeting at Jerusalem Chamber, and from Kate and from Bolton I heard the same account. The meeting was more clever than earnest, the speeches below tone and frivolous. Then M spoke to a higher key, with more feeling for the people and with more practical sense of their needs. He described the " man hardened by East End life, softened to tears and lifted to hope by the music of the Worship Hour." . . So let ns hope on for him. I have been to the Communicants' Meeting. The communicants mustered fairly well and were sweet. I tried to show them how goodness walks among us, like a light surprising us ; how one day we may be at one with it, how now we may touch it. Yesterday at the Congregational Committee I loved my people more than ever, and at the Liberal ditto I hated and shrank from politicians. W'e discussed places and decided to go to Cambridge, to get up a fund for church decoration, to discuss Willis and over- haul Stewart. They were very fair to Stewart and appreciate his qualities. " He's a ruff 'un like me," says Browning, " and I ain't fit for a smooth post." They will try to get volunteers to show people to seats. I am very happy. Your note has made me so. Foolish man that I am, I live on your life, and if I feel you are gettuig well, I live. . . 382 LETTERS. 1887 Social Soibnoe Conqeess, Manchestbb, September 3rd, 1887. My dear Feaijk, Here is a letter from the centre of thought. There are 4,000 people gathered to discuss atoms, thoughts, logics, and isms — they gad about and sit in lecture-rooms and generate gases. My calm judgment is that the meeting must take its place among the big advertising agencies which distinguish progress. Men unknown in their studies, and the studies themselves are here advertised. On the whole it is good, better that the men in the street should know that atoms, " isms," and logics exist. . . About the Exhibition it is impossible to say enough. We spent the whole of yesterday among the pictures, and it did us good to note how progress was written on the fifty years' work. Clearly, too, the living artists seek their motive in more serious subjects than did the dead ones. Of course one feels as one always does that the human ideal is expressed in past rather than in present forms. Artists don't look at facts to find truth. Those who do look at facts, Hke Zola, look to find horror and sensation. We looked at the fmrdture exhibits thinking of you, and Y saw one room with a frieze which gave her a thought she will transfer. On Wednesday evening we went to Roscoe's lecture. It was not satisfactory, as it was too learned for most of us and not learned enough for the learned. On Thursday — (my wife is so naughty and is bothering me so much about the extra attrac- tion in a certain lady's figure caused by her 9 J stone, that serious writing is impossible. She has just addressed the Association on "The duty of serious living,' ' so that our common stock is used up). Good-bye, with dearest love, S. A. B. St. Jude's, Whitbchapel, March 1888. ■ My dbae, Feank, On Monday we had a quiet evening, having limched with the Forbeses and made a selection of Israel's pictures for our Exhibition. The Forbeses are pleasant, common-sensible people and the pictures are an education. Forbes evidently has a bit of tender, social sentiment, and this comes out in his love of Israel, Corot, Millet, etc. You will get a sight of our pictures. . . On Tuesday we had a long visit from Brooke Lambert. He is a very fine fellow, and represents nineteenth- century Christianity. He takes misfortune from God, and goes on as it the Best were still Governor. We greatly enjoyed 'our talk, and there is just a chance that he may join us in Florence. . . LETTERS, 1888 383 I went down to see Hart Dyke about our University Training for Teachers scheme. He was most pleasant and it looks as if the Universities and University Colleges might be recognised as Training Colleges. Might it not be a good plan to put the scheme before Bristol teachers ? . . . Thursday, a few of my young parson friends spent " a quiet day" together with Young and me at Kingston. We talked over our work and tried to reaUse where as Liberals we fail. We do fail, we do not get into our teaching something which ia good in that teaching which we know to be wrong. We need, I thinls, much more of meditation and more practices of self- control. . . :•■ I read Gladstone on Robert Elsmere in the train. He gets the better of the argument and with a power of words tramples on the inadequacy of Mrs. Ward's position. He makes so much of connection with the Church and values it not only because of its strength, but because it is the basis of authority. A queer mind, Gladstone's, which can adopt a principle in religion from which it shrinks in politics. If I were a Conservative I would write an article on him, using against him his argument against Mrs. Ward. . . Friday was our blessed " Sabbath," and we talked out Y 's new book on Physiology. She will set to work on it after we return from Italy. Love for ever, S. A. B. Naples, A-pril 23rd, 1888. My deae Feaiik, After you left us at Pisa we took a drive to a Carthusian monastery. The great place with its eleven dirty, ignorant inmates, its frescoes of bad art, its cool courts with oranges and flowers, its magnificent situation, set us thinking. Clearly its disestablishment was justified, but clearly also there is a use in any system for btuldings adapted for rest, for self-culture, and for common life. Perhaps some day the need for convalescent homes for the mind will be recognised. From Pisa we travelled to Rome, passing from the highly cultivated plots of Tuscany to the desert stretches of the Papal States. Was the cause large holdings ? We don't know, but I think if these deserts were given to the peasants who now emigrate they would find America at home. Rome we felt to be a confusion or to have a unity too great for our comprehension. . . Such study as I gave to Alichelangelo and Raphael sent the latter up very high. In Michelangelo] there is so little hope. 384 LETTEES, 1888 His prophets see nothing but woe, woe ; with all the glory of form, with the beauty of life, his people wake to sorrow. All is fine and his study opens our eyes to see the sorrow which goes to the buildiag of truth, but give me Raphael. His Christ of the Transfiguration is a man who knows sorrow and triumph, whose glory is of giving. His " Eisputa " shows us men worshipping with the devotion of Fra Angelico's men, but men with characters formed by thought and inquiry. In fact, as I looked I asked myself what more was wanted. If art be one voice through which is answered the question " What is the mystery of life ? " then what more is wanted than the voice which says " Think," " Study," " Be yourself," and " Worship." Then it came to me that there was httle in Raphael of what this age has learnt about " doing," " service," etc., etc. The painter of the future, the man who wUl put into form a later answer to the question, must be one who will tell of love in action as well as in con- templation. The greatest is yet to be and no art is in the truest sense " Christian," that is, expressive of the truth that " He who would save his life must give it." . . . From Rome we came here and have put up at a villa in the midst of a vineyard which slopes to the sea, and whence we have a view which tempts to idleness and one expects to hear singing, to see dancing, and find life a play. Naples is a town which gutters but does not glow. The colours which flit from the balconies, the bright figures in the streets, the small silver- decorated horses, the sharp sounds — all make, as I said, a glitter. We have been to the Museum to see our old love, the Listening Pan, which as my wife says should be kexJt as a com- panion to the Mercury of the Bargello to represent obedience as that represents action. By the by, don't take what I have written about art as from her. She knows so much more that I only pick up her crumbs, and it won't do to have her credited with my errors. She has been very well and is, of course, our life, bringing out in every one his best and making even the blind see. I wish we could find out how to keep her well in Whitechapel ; here she does so much and is so much. One day we started at 8.30 and were at it tOl 7.30, and she was then up for a moonlight walk. This was on Vesuvius day, which has been the event of our journey since Florence. We drove up the slopes through groves where spring was revelling in his power, over lava streams, dark, contorted like the snakes which seized Laocoon, up to the railway which is 2,000 feet above the sea. Here we turned our backs on the wonders of nature, to admire how, by an almost perpendicular road, man had made a way for cars to pass. We got in and in ten minutes were hauled up 1 ,300 feet. Then we were on the outside of the crater. We looked down on islands, sea, and land. We felt the smallness of ourselves — of man — in the presence of LETTERS, 1888 385 the world. We forgot our fears and hopes, worshipping some- thing greater — the world — in which we are but ants. Then we turned and behold a greater than the world. The earth itself was shaking, its sides were torn by a force which was rending its rocks ; with a restrained roar some mightier power was sending out breath after breath which rolled in volumes to the heavens in an eternal stream. For a moment we felt ourselves in front of Force, Power. And now the world — everything — seemed small and we understood why the first name given to God was " the Strong One." I wish I could give you some idea of the inside of the crater, its vast gloomy circurnference, its ridges of contorted lava, its veins of yellow and red, its volume upon volume of steam with every now and then a roar followed by the belcliing forth of rocks and stones. The idea which it left in my mind was of " Force," and somehow of the unity of Force with Beauty. Terrible as it was, it was also beautiful, beautiful enough for a Turner's picture. Some day, though, you will come yourself or some day a worthy person will tell what he has seen. We will bring you ourselves. Yes — and I expect a good portion of the mountain if we succeed in bringing home the specimens my wife has made us collect ! Rocks of all forms and colours did she and we gather. Once Marion was seen choking over a chasm while Bartholomew was dragging at a piece of yellow stone, pulling it, as he said, from the jaws of hell, so sulphurous and hot was it. You will see from all that we are very well, and to-day we are just basking while ever3rthing around us sleeps. Xow with love to you all. Ever yours, S. A. B. St. Judb's Vioaeaqb, Whitechapel, 2Iay 12th., 1888. My deah Fraitk, Once more we are at home. Lucerne was very beautiful, more beautiful than any place we know. Thence we travelled to Strasburg to meet Nunn, who wished to see us on his way to Switzerland. It was pleasant to meet him in his holiday costume. He has a very beautiful character, a simple heart with a strong mind. He plans to adopt the son of a peasant and to bring him up as his own brother. This hardly seems wise, or really good for the boy, but Nunn has a generous notion at bottom and generosity is never a wasted expenditure. With Strasburg after Italy we were disappointed. The Cathedral missed a something, I know not what. Those in Italy spoke of some sort of common life. That of Strasburg 386 LETTERS, 1888 was solitary — unsocial — individual. I wonder i£ the keynote of Gothic is individuahsm. The most striking thing in the town was the soldiers, who looked grand and were everywhere. From Strasburg we journeyed to Brussels . here we enjoyed 3.1ass ia the Cathedral on Ascension Day, a Mass much more beautifully sung than that in Milan, and during which the vast congregation was most reverent. I tried to feel how such a service might be translated into the realms of thought. From Brussels we came home, having again a quiet passage. Here we found everything well, the table was loaded with flowers to give us welcome, friends were everywhere. The Bartholomews had. even come to the station. We have as yet only shaken hands and looked pleased, though the wife had to go to Miss Edwards's lecture on the women of Egypt. In the eveniag we dined in. Toynbee and then went to bed. With love to all, S. A. B. KiLKEE, Ireland, September Ifh, 1888. My dbae Fbank, After a week with the Monteagles we have come on here for a few days to see the Atlantic. Our stay at JMount Trenchard was very interesting. The place stretches along the bank of the Shannon, and is surrounded with extensive woods, through which paths wind over " lynns," and the estate includes three villages. Monteagle has been a model landlord, and so the houses are good. He has developed resources and employs twenty men at a saw- mill . We went about seeing land, landlords, and people. The land is terribly neglected, and there is hardly a field which is not full of "wire" grass, weeds, and thistles. The cottages, even when well built, have no gardens nicely kept with flowers and no sign of care in furniture. To-day in one specially well-built I^saw the pig and the fowls admitted to a place at the fireside. If there be plenty there is untidiness, and if there be want the untidiness becomes squalor. With all this the people are finely grown, clean-skinned, and very intelhgent. The girls it is a pleasure to look at. The men seem "noble savages" — noble by look, by manners, by the respect they show for women, by their loyalty to one another, by their intelligence — savages by their powers for hating, by their love of passionate revenge, by their dislike of hard work, by their fondness for drama, by their simulated servility. Their landlords are like themselves — idle, proud, and incapable of sustained effort. With all the cncumstances, if I were responsible here, I would shun politics ; I would devote myself to local work, to developing better farming and local government.^ In time the people will be sick of agitation, and|then*[theyj.will turn with all theic old LETTERS, 1888 387 loyalty — this time founded on reason — to follow the men who have done right. It is worse than useless, it is almost wicked to fight for " Union." The ideal, if it be beautiful, is not possible ; representation has been accepted as a system of Government and by representation Ireland has declared its will. It must have its will, or be governed as a Crown colony, and this is impossible. Love to all, S. A. B. St. Jtjde's Vioaragb, WmTBCHAPEL, October 1888, To H. 0. B. When I got home the house smiled a welcome, shadows of my wife's smiles. The house never would have smiled so without her love and thought. The study was warm, light and full of red ! . . I sat there after dinner and finished Idolatry. It is a strong book and the man may be eager for God, though he does play suspiciously near what is beastly. It is a grand picture of broken idols, and the fair idol which attracts so many is well broken at the end. Balder found that not even his own righteousness could be a God. That's well done, so all the way through is the minghng of fact and fancy, mental and physical phenomena. . . A very httle, as you say, makes me happy. I have too large a store of hope to give up for long. . . Knowles, of The Nineteenth Caniury, to whom I sent Practicable Socialism with a stamped envelope for its return, to-day sends me the proof. My breath is a bit taken away as some of the statements are strong and roughly stated. I must see to their correctness. We will go over the proof together. . . A was with me yesterday — I put my foot down on his business arrangements and showed myself to be your disciple in the matter of accounts. He has to get out another system. I do dislike his manner and I am never more severe to anyone. I shall tell him some day I expect return in my own coin for my investment of time and brain. . . It is just nine and I shall get off this letter so that you may have a message to-night at Liverpool. What a lot there is to tell when lives are shared as are ours. Uneventful I should describe yesterday and Sunday to be, were I writing to others ; to you this quire of paper would not tell you all. . . Nmse and fanny dined with me off pheasant, Nurse feeling haK uncomfortable lest she were eating what I liked. Women spoil men. S. A. B. 388 LETTERS, 1889 Ti'.e ioll'^wing two extracts are from two letters, on February 9Mi and February 16th, 1889 : To F. G. B. On Tuesday we went vip early to the Parnell Commission. The Secretary received us and took us to good places in the body of the ooiu?t near the Judges. Soon the court filled and we were struck by the dignity of the dark, ill- shaped, and in- convenient room. Davitt was there with a face like Mazziui's, sad, earnest, and more emotional than reasoning — a good man. Webster, Russell, James, Reed, Lockwood, Atkinson, faced us. Webster — a ponderous man — most irritable and ready to snub any interference, especially Graham's. His questions showed cultm-e, experience, force, but not agility. He could not fight a losing fight. Russell is sleek, quick, and just the man to seize an advantage. James is cruel. Lockwood full of humour. The witness was Le Carron, and we were intensely interested as for hour after hour he, without a failure in date or name, gave his evidence. If a patriotic spy is justified, he is one, but somehow one can't respect the man who saves lives by sacrificing truth and honour. To F. G. B. My wife has j ust had an attack of palpitation from consternation over Piggott so I have had to break off my letter and discuss the Parnell Commission. . . I never conceived The Times could have had such a foundation and the effect will be bad. Of course there will be a general rout, as the Unionists have built so much on the unfitness of Ireland's chosen. But this is not the evil result I mean. Now there will be a sort of justification for assumiug that an opponent must be wicked, a wider disbelief in any conscientious action. Sometimes I think om: only hope is in a movement which will compel people to see that only truth and good matter. There is no leading man, politician or parson, who so teaches. They all have some platform. St. Judb's Cottage, Hampstead, 1890, My deae Frank, We have been staying at Grace Dieu Manor with the Charles Booths, and enjoyed our stay to the end. He is a noble fellow — one of the natures which seem to be grown fine and to need nothing from circumstance. At any rate by himself, by faithful obedience to his own right, he is higher than most men. If his LETTERS, 1890 389 own right could be transfigured, by say, Christ's right, how high he would be ! He reminds one of the Stoics — Seneca and Aurelius — a Christian before Christ. J le works hard and lives low. When he is in East London he dwells in a workman's home, so as to be in full touch with their life. . . We went to there from Oxford when I had preached on Sunday, staying with the J.Iarkbys. The}' are nice folk and you will hear tales of their life, her drawings, and their experience in India. They live at Headington on three acres overlooking Oxford. Yesterday ivy vvife went to the Board wlnle I stayed at home and read A Winter's Tale. We are to be taken this evening to see Miss Anderson in it. The play did not fi.nd me as do some of Shakespeare's ; there is a poverty about the plot and a want of subtletj' in the characters. It is a play made, as it were, out of the chips of the workshop. I agree though with you in wishing to put other books aside and study him. On Tuesday I went to see a church Vatoher has built in Step- ney. His father left him a lot of money and he has used it to build a magnificent structure with double aisles — mysterious corners — vaulted roof, etc. There is something great in his modesty (it is only a surmise that he has done it), which has built such a grand structure. We are both struck by the absence of advertising in his eiiorts, and in the goodness of what he and his wife have done. . . On Thursday I saw Mrs. Humphry Ward about her Settle- ment. I don't think it will go. Why should it ? It has neither the force of a sectarian movement nor the charm of a free move- ment. A few people are caught by the phantom beauty of Elsmere's character, but it cannot be grasped. She is a sweet tender woman, full of anxieties, too great anxieties, to serve others. She was meant to be religious and is fitted for the Mary service rather than the Martha busjmess of this age. We have had some good talks, and notably one on the possibility of religion for the crassly ignorant. We have a busy week before us. Mabel Bradby is to be married this morning and to-night we dine with the Courtneys. There is no end to do. St. Jude's is getting ripe for harvest and might be a centre of rehgious life. Toynbee might be extended and influence public opinion. Wadham might be developed and the beginning made of a residential University ; to do this, though, there must be a staff of teachers and tutors. I have greatly enjoyed Stevenson's Essays. They are good. One about Walt Whitman put exactly what I think about lum and confirms a shy suspicion that he is the first longo iniervallo of the poets of the twentieth century, the true developer of the truth expressed in the form of the tale I love about " gun, rust, bust, dust." Now good-bye, with dearest love for ever, S. A. B, 390 LETTERS, 1893 Whitbchapel, February 1893. My DEAB FEAiiTK, How lovely are these days ! Perfect spring day follows perfect spring day. Lough, M.P., who dined with us, spoke of the beauty of the weather in contrast with the ugliness of the " House." . . . Tuesday we went to an " At Home " at the Bryces' and saw the folk who are at the tops of things — the motes in the sunshine. We had no very thrilling talks and met no dear friends, but we enjoyed ourselves. Electric lighting helps and there were many there we knew. On Wednesday we dined with the Courtneys. Balfour, Morley, Asquith, the next Duke of Devonshire, and Hobhouse were there. It was very interesting. My wife fell in love with Balfour and I with Morley. We must tell you of their talk when we meet. It was most free, and Mr. Gladstone came in for good- tempered criticism. Morley is a better parson than politician. He has the narrow sense of right, the stiff back and the some- what sensitive organisation of a parson. Asquith is the better politician. He has the sense of what will grow, knows with how much wrong to put up, but is still wanting in ease and polish which he will gain. Balfour is charming in manner, as easy as a giant, but his greatest faith seems to be in doubt. Here you have the basis of his conservatism, and he is saved from cynicism by his sweetness of nature. How by and by he will hate the young men who follow him ! He doubts because he has a sense of responsibihty. They doubt because they are conceited. I have been to see Ibsen's Master Builder. It is long since I have seen such good acting. Ellen Terry never moves my heart, only my head. This just moved me altogether and I nearly shouted. The play itself is very stimulating. It has a message, but I doubt if the message is true. Roughly translated it is Pecca fortiter, but, like other parables, it has several interpreta- tions. One is, Go at all risks after your ideal, climb as high as you can build, live in your castles in the air. Another is, Seek your own end at all costs, get everything else out of the way. Another is. War against convention, which has given a wrong meaning to duty, which has invented a conscience, which destroys the umate goodness of human nature. My reading has been David Grieve, which Mrs. Humphry Ward sent me. The book is so honestly written and with such high purpose that one does not care to condemn it for its length, its want of interest, or its artistic defects. Honest writiug won't make up for insight, and even the most instructed cat (able to describe every ornament and gesture of her Majesty) would not see the Queen. Mrs. Ward painfully tells of all that is visible in character, but somehow does not see the man. Then the noble purpose, that of showing godliness as the end of education, is LETTERS, 1895 391 someliow not reached. The education is not touched with modern fire and remains that of all the ages. We would want someone to show the frivolity — the indifference — the emotions — and the passions of the century breaking in on the human soul — someone to give voice to the unheard messages of the hour. I have also been to see Lord Coleridge ;■<" Marlowe Memorial, which has been started by some Toj'ubee Mall students. Lord Coleridge is sleek and satisfied, better cultm-ed than sustained, more insinuating than strong, a literary rather than a legal man. He complained bitterly of Street as an architect. What do you think of the Tolstoi tales ? If you like what you have read, I will lend you some. We have been much fascinated by their delicacy and insight. Love always, S. A. B. Wakdbn's Lodge, Whitechapel, August 2nd, 1895. My dbah Maey,^ The silk is in my Bible as a book-marker and as a token of your thought about me when you were winding the silk. It is pretty work to wind silk and gives time for thinking and for singing. Ask yoiu: Mother to tell you a tale of Pippa — an Italian girl who wound sUk all day long and had one holiday. She used it — well, the tale will tell you how she used it. To-day I expect you are running over the Cornish country, making friends and plans. We expect to have a, good time with you and are going to make ourselves young before we come. I used to see a picture of a mill which turned old people into young. It was in our magic lantern. Your father will remember it. I have never seen a real null like the picture, but I have found that there are other ways of getting young, so we shall use those ways to come to you quite young. Dorothy is quite well. She went to a party yesterday. To- day we are going to Ely. It is a place which once was an island but is now dry. In old days people built on it a house for quiet living and they made it beautiful. This is now the Cathedral. We are going to stay with the Itean, and then to-morrow twenty Whitechapel people are coming to join us. We shall go into the Cathedral and listen to music in the dark so that the shadows will seem to speak. Perhaps music is the talk of shadows. With love, your Saml. A. Baenett. 8, Royal York Cresce:^t, Clifton. My deae Wife, How I wish you could find the children when you come in anxious over your invalid. Their life, their originahty, their 1 His little niece, aged nine. 392 LETTERS. 1895 sweetness are all so helpful. They have not the depth of grown- ups, but somehow they seem to mherit quahties grown-ups learn by life and losses. Would that you could see and hear them in your pretty room. They have been playing a history card game when " horrid facts " have been got into their minds without any relation. PhylHs's direct common sense and Dorothy's gentle feeling run well in couples. Dorothy fell to-day with the hoop and bruised her arm. She won't be able to cycle to-morrow, but will be right in a day or two. I tell her it is preparation against being a Lord Mayor. We have all enjoyed our dinner, laughing and telling tales. Good night, love always, S. A. B. Printed by Uazell, Watson ft Yiney, Ld., London and Aylesbury^ England.