■A PVS BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUN THE GIFT OF Henrg W. Sage 1891 dim^g : ]% r.ATE DUE 2 8 '88 #Sf! a l DEC 12 1958 li^ ■ "Jit' ,/> Cornell University Library HC255 .P45 Industrial history of modern Engla^^ by olin 3 1924 029 963 364 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tlie Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029963364 THE INDUSTRIAL HISTORY OF MODERN ENGLAND BY GEORGE HERBERT FERRIS AUTHOR OF ^ ' GERMANY AND THE GERMAN EMPEROR ' * A SHORT HISTORY OF WAR AND PEACE ' ' RUSSIA IN REVOLUTION * ETC. NEW YORK HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY 1514 /^ INTRODUCTION The purpose of this volume is to outline the facts and to interpret the spirit of the economic history of Great Britain in the last hundred and fifty years. The writer believed it to be a useful task to focus within such limits as these a narrative of the social transformation through which the mother- country of industrialism has passed since the invention of the steam-engine ; and, from this, he was led on to an attempt to characterise the period, and the main current of thought which the play of economic forces has provoked. With so vast a subject, and great libraries of undigested evidence challenging attention, it seemed beyond hope to escape all the pitfalls in the way of such an essay. The recent accumula- tions of statistical material, in particular, must be mastered, their essential results obtained, and the contributory detail then eliminated, like the scaffolding when a building is complete, lest the large outlines be obscured. The writer enjoyed, however, beside the interest of the task, the stimulus of contact with industry and business at several points. Trades translated themselves back out of statistics into terms of flesh and blood|. viii MODERN ENGLAOT) Machines and tools were found to be strangely associated with types of character, collective and personal, and these characteristics with certain public institutions often credited with a very different origin. The " working - classes " dis- appeared, and an infinite variety of labouring Britons emerged. Human nature constantly asserted itself against academic formulae. This experience may, or may not, be reflected in the following pages ; but, assuredly, the student is learning little of his country's past who caimot see, behind the abstractions necessary to repre- sent life in the mass, a procession of his own forebears, more or less individual beings like him- self, toiling, striving, hoping, suffering — chiefly unlike himself in that they could not look forward into those years which now lie below him like a many- coloured landscape. To these humble dead, and not alone to the conspicuous figures^ we owe what we are and have. If such susceptibility can be schooled to the scruples of sound investigation, it will contribute reality to the catalogue of events, and justice to the estimate of persons and movements. Arnold Toynbee set the example of dating the " Industrial Revolution " between 1760 and 1840, the years in which steam was brought into use in the textile and iron trades, and was applied to land and sea carriage. This treatment left the story of the extension of the factory system in the latter half of the nineteenth century, of Free INTRODUCTION ix Trade, the " rural exodus," the urban "residuum," and the new finance, to appear as a mere sequel ; and it necessarily ignored certain other results of the economic process, of which the establish- ment of political democracy, collective bargaining,^ compulsory education, old - age pensions, mini- mum wage boards, and the decline of the birth- rate are, perhaps, the most significant. Thirty changeful years have passed since Toynbee's noble spirit was quenched. Ideas for which he had to fight have become common property ; some things against which he fought are now only curious survivals. The " social problem " is not solved ; but a gentler, wiser temper prevails on every hand. The Victorian giants are dead, and already much of their noisy warfare is meaning- less, except to the student. Nobody now calls himself a disciple of Bentham or Ricardo, who exercised an almost unlimited sway over a yet earlier generation ; they are forgotten save by a few pious scholars. Old questions have a com- plexion that our fathers and grandfathers would not have recognized ; new questions have arisen. Alike in material affairs and in the world of thought, we have passed into a period of normal develop- ment. Throughout the Western world, the com- monalty enjoy to-day, in a degree heretofore unknown, the fruits of social peace. And England, if she has no longer any monopoly of the means to wealth, holds her moral primacy among the nations. Dogma is dissolved ; privi- X MODERN ENGLAND lege is limited ; prejudice is disabled in a day when navvies become poets, and farm-boys live to mould, by consent, not conquest, the destinies of a continent. The sense of " fairplay " is re- vived. Parties face each other at Westminster, for the task of government could not be fulfilled without them. But the voter does not wor- ship his party ; and, behind all the shibboleths, there is a constantly extended ground of common agreement. This is the historian's opportunity. A phase in the process of time has been completed, a cycle which we can examine, coolly, as a whole. A period has become material for history ; that is to say, something more than a day-to-day and year-to-year chronicle has become possible, and we can attempt to group its movements, ideas, personalities according to their total significance. Nothing, indeed, breaks the continuity of himaan life ; but this period of a century and a half does already reveal a unity, a prevailing character, of its own. It is one of the major epochs of dis- ruption and re-settlement which are marked as clearly upon the plane of human history as Alpine blocks upon the level crust of the globe. England has been fundamentally re-made ; and from this tiny island seismic waves have passed and are yet passing to the uttermost ends of the earth. The greatest of those governing personages with whom the historians are mainly concerned look small in the perspective of this mighty change. INTRODUCTION xi Its sheer violence overclouds most of our story. The individuals who emerge mimic the tumult of the impersonal forces that drive them on, shouting as the Wagnerian hero must shout through an orchestral whirlwind ; while, in the dim background, a multitudinous, indistinguish- able chorus cries to the gods for help. At length, a ray of light breaks upon the field of strife, worse than any war, in which genera- tions of Englishmen have been overwhelmed. In the outset a failing struggle against machines and novel forms of energy, it is seen to become a struggle increasingly successful against the anarchy of unrestrained competition. Wage statistics figure little in the following pages, be- cause it is practically impossible to construct for the whole period a ratio of the innumerable elements constituting an average real wage. But there is abundant evidence, and economists gene- rally agree, that the condition of the labouring masses was not again as prosperous as it had been in the first half of the eighteenth century until towards the end of the nineteenth. At the former point, there still remained something of an English social settlement, an accepted condition of affairs affording the humblest subject a certain security. At the latter point, industrial anarchy and the philosophy of anarchy had become hateful, and the basis had been laid of a re-organization of society which, without injuring the fortunate, will again give a certain security to the humblest xii MODERN ENGLAND subject of the realm. In the gulf between these points lies our topic. On closer examination, the industrial cycle appears to fall into three part^ — a term of dis-^ Solution, lasting from the middle of the eighteenth century to the end of the Great War ; a term of stagnation, lasting thence to the middle of the nineteenth century ; and a term of slow recon- struction, carrying us into our own time. It is not suggested that every incident and every actor in the immense drama of national develop- ment can be covered by this or any other formula. Life is not a Chinese puzzle ; and those who protest (as we must do) against the mischief of false abstractions in the past do well to walk warily in this path. It is, however, very un- likely that historical description will ever exert the influence, or its errors work the mischief, that once came of a priori philosophizing. Our aim is to state and classify facts, not to deduce eternal and immutable laws. If there be error — if we have wrongly interpreted the enclosure of the conmion lands, the mechanical inventions, the protective tariff, the system of allowances, the new Poor Law, Trade Unionism, Chartism, Free Trade, the Factory, Health, and Education Acts, the succession of trade crises and popular agita- tions, or the attitude of parties toward any of these events, correction is easy. When we pass from the movement of events to the movement of opinion, we are on more INTRODUCTION xiii debatable ground. Current thought is too valu- able an index of the spirit of a period, and too influential in its affairs, to be left out of account. To speak of the Navigation Acts without naming Adam Smith, of the triumph of Laisser Faire in 1834 without some reference to the philosophy of Bentham, Malthus, and Ricardo, of the first rising of organized labour without naming Dickens and Carlyle, of the new social movement of the end of the century without mention of TojTibee and Henry George, William Morris and the Fabian Society — this would be to waste some of the most eloquent evidence of the time. To the extent of some brief passages, the risk of bias must be run. With the earlier thinkers just named, there can be little risk; the others will be regarded as objectively as is yet possible. It is not by accident that these names fall into three groups, which, in fact, correspond with the triple division of our period just indicated. The classic or orthodox economists hastened and justified the disintegration of what remained of the medieval settlement of Enghsh life. Their sincerity is no more to be questioned than their high talents. They as well as any could plead historical necessity. But the fate of the bookish doctrinaire dogged them. No more influential school of philosophy ever existed ; yet none has been so extensively discredited in the passage of time. The reason for this remarkable change is to be found in the succession of events presently xiv MODERN ENGLAND to be traced. Their "inexorable laws" ex- pressed a widespread desire rather than a scientific synthesis ; when the needs of the nation and its temper changed, the flaws in their ingenious structure appeared plainly, and men turned else- where for help. Meanwhile, masses of the people were suffering hunger, cruelty, and neglect. Carlyle and Dickens pre-eminently represent the first puzzled revolt of conscience against these miseries. With the establishment of Free Trade, the lowest depth is passed; and, while the re- volution in manufacture and finance is fulfilling itself in one occupation after another, new pro- phets arise who, much as they differ in their prescriptions, agree in this, that unrestrained com- petition has proved a curse, not a blessing, and that, somehow, society must be organized, if the greatest good is to reach the greatest number. From this new starting-point, the characteristic work of the twentieth century is developing, with some such material assets as our appendices ex- hibit, and others not so measurable — above all, the will to learn, endure, and achieve. The lesson of nineteenth - century industrialism has been a hard one. We may easily make mistakes in interpreting it. There is only one unpardon- able mistake. Let no man doubt that the nation which had the strength to pass this test will face without fear the worst the future can reveal. London, Uay 1914. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .... CHAPTER I THE GREAT DISRUPTION I. A New Kind of Tyrant II. The Three Factors . III. The New Capitalism . IV. The Market, and the Inventors V. Labour on the Land . VI. The Transformation of Industry VII. The Victims : Speenhamland PA9B vii 1 5 8 13 20 26 33 CHAPTER II FROM THE FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO (1801-1820) I. The People are Numbered II. In the Shadow of War III. Agriculture under the Corn Laws IV. The Rise of Manufacture V. The First " Over-Production " Crisis VI. Pioneers of Reform 42 48 64 73 101 109 XVI MODERN ENGLAND CHAPTEK III THE LOWEST DEPTH (1821-1834) I. Rural England in the 'Twenties II. Degradation of the Labourer . III. Un-Natural History of the Slum IV. The Radical Reformers V. The Railway and Steamship . CHAPTER IV THE INFLUENCE OP THE ECONOMISTS 125 133 147 157 172 179 CHAPTER V ON THE VERGE OP REVOLUTION (1833-1849) I. A Late Harvest ..... 201 II. The First Factory Acts .... 206 III. The New Poor Law ..... 216 IV. The General Strike ..... 227 ~^ V. The Chartists ...... 237 ^ VI. End of the Corn Law .... 248 CHAPTER VI THE WORLD'S WORKSHOP (1850-1866) I. Employment and Education .... 262 II. Problems of Peace and War .... 272 III. The Completion of Free Trade . . . 280 IV. Round with the Factory Inspectors . . . 295 CONTENTS XMTl CHAPTER VII THE LIBERAL STATE (1867-1885) I. Toward Democracy . II. The Trade-Union Compromise III. Co-operation, Thrift, Conciliation IV. The Collapse of Agriculture . V. A Trade Crisis Analysed CHAPTER VIII THE AWAKENING (1886-1900) I. The "Residuum" Discovered II. The "Sweating System" III. At the Dock-Gates . IV. Voices of the New Spirit V. Resurrection . VI. Organization . CHAPTER IX THE NEW AGE I. Population and Wealth II. New Lamps for Old .... III. Agricultural Revival . . . • IV. Crusade of the Life-Savers . V. Unemployment, Strikes, the Minimum Wage VI. Conclusion . . . • • xviii MODERN ENGLAND APPENDICES ~ ■ PAGE I. Population and Emigration : A. Early Estimates j B. United Kingdom, 1821-1911 ; C. England and "Wales, 1801-1911 ; D. The Chief Industrial Counties ; E. The British Empire . . 549 II. Employment and Trade Unionism: A. Occupa- tions, England and Wales, 1901 ; B. Trade Union Membership, United Kingdom, 1901 . 556 III. Census oe Phoduction, 1907: A. Workers in- cluded ; B. Net Output ; C. Industrial Output by Groups of Trades ; D. Aggregate Value of United Kingdom Produce ; E. Exports and Imports ; F. Capital, Income, and Savings . 560 IV. Distribution or Income and Capital — Over- Sea Investments .... 568 V. International Commerce : A. Exports, 1854-1912; B. Exports of United Kingdom, United States, Germany, and France, 1880-1913 ; C. Britain's Best Customers, 1886-1911 . .573 CONTENTS XIX VI. "Wages and Prices : A. Prices, 1818-1910 (Sauer- beck) ; B. Purchasing Power of £1, 1895-1912 ; C. The Course of Wages, 1780-1899 (Bowley), 1879-1910 (Board of Trade, and G. H. Wood) ; D. Unemployment ; E. Wages in the Cotton Trade, 1806-1906 (Wood) . . .576 VII. Births and Deaths, Wealth and Poverty . 582 A SHORT BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . .583 INDEX 595 tl'y-VVV:>i-) ijun-:, ' :i,i.-Tii^r ,sa>ivr ./ ■; ^^^. THE INDUSTRIAL HISTORY OF MODERN ENGLAND INDUSTRIAL HISTORY OF MODERN ENGLAND CHAPTER I THE GREAT DISRUPTION I. A New Kind of Tyrant It is a very old speculation, but not yet altogether unfruitful, why the great revolt of the end of the eighteenth century took place in Paris, and not even a pale copy of it in London. Britons flattered themselves then, and flatter themselves still, on their moderation ; this is the favourite answer. " The riots which have taken place in many parts of England and Scotland on account of the high price of provisions " — so opens the Annual Register for 1801 — " were neither so violent nor so obstinate as they would have been in countries where there is less moderation of character in the people and less confidence in means of constitutional relief." The writer added that " every candid mind was less offended at the commotions of the populace than struck with their forbearance and patience." It is true that, with all its roughness, there is a quality of moderation in the British nature, which will take many blows if it can keep the sense of " fair play " and " elbow-room." The great A 1 2 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. constitutional advances which England had made had undoubtedly entered into the character of the nation. A conservative people in the heart of them, even more than their great-grandchildren are ; inured to hard labour and short commons ; very ready to follow the Squire, and to see the Calvinist Devil in the uniform of Napoleon Buonaparte, a modicum of personal independence was the thing they prized most. Outright serfdom, still existing over the greater part of Europe, had here faded out four centuries earlier. Internal peace had given, for a century and a half, a stabil- ity of social conditions unknown in any other part of the civilized world. The power of monarchy had been effectually limited. The Church was not strong enough to be seriously oppressive. In Parliament, a balance of merchant and landlord had promised some benefit to the third party, the universal worker. Outside, the infant news- paper press could not be silenced. Except in the form of government momentarily achieved, France was far behind the island kingdom in political and economic development. Nothing so old-fashioned as the French Revolution could take place in London. The flash-point of pubUc anger varies mysteri- ously ; but this much is plain. The oppressor in France was so ancient and decrepit as to have become contemptible ; and contempt for the present powers is a strong groundwork for a revolutionary faith. The British people were poor, and almost § I.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 3 voiceless in the State. They certainly could not despise their political governors ; but, if the Hanoverian Oligarchy had been as feeble as the Bourbon Court, the real enemy would have remained. It was, indeed, in an atmosphere of free thought, amid strange stirrings of new life, that men saw a titanic arm pierce the blue, take one by one of their hoary instruments and institu- tions, break them to pieces, and begin to rebuild them with clumsy magic in the huddled streets of industrial cities. This was no medieval tyrant, foul in familiar ways. Intelligence, even in its lower forms, will command the mass of men ; and this thing, the Machine, seemed marvellously to combine the wit of a living being with the inexhaustible, inexorable energy of Nature. Of successful protests there could be but little hope. In the towns, men would quickly decide to struggle for a share of the pro- digious wealth that was to come. But England was still mainly rural ; and in the shires, amid the decay of patriarchal organization, the elder peasants would dream, if they dreamed at all, in the spirit of Gray's Elegy, of a return to the " good old days " when the poor man could own his acre, and manual skill counted, and the son stepped into the father's shoes. Vain regrets ! Squire Western junior, a high-farming disciple of Arthur Young, who would not steal the goose from the common, but had no scruples about stealing the common from the poor human goose, was unconsciously recruiting 4: MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. for his hated rival, the machine-owning capitalist ; and, when the village had been emptied into the workhouse, it followed as logically as the deductions of Adam Smith, or the mechanics of his young friend Watt of Greenock, that the workhouse would be emptied into the factory. Still, this was not the sheer, senseless barbarity to which the nations had been accustomed in the olden days. The greed of the French seigneur was as stupid as cruel ; the greed of the cotton- lord was directed by lively intelligence, and could assume on occasion a philosophic garb, decorated with the saving virtues, national and personal. The machine-owners had behind them the full force of a State, showing, it is true, little of the efficiency of the steam-pump or the spinning-mule, but still the most perfect of the age. They must be favoured, for were they not to produce the millions needed to bring the Corsican usurper to his knees ? London — as preponderant, then, in the life of England as Paris in that of France, and as necessary to any proletarian rising — had been a commercial and industrial city for centuries, had tasted the wealth of the Indies before the rural upheaval began, and knew of old how to keep her lowlier citizens satisfied. It is a piteous stoiy, this of the quick, unprepared, unsoftened trans- formation of a people's life ; and yet there is in it the grandeur and significance of a forward-pointing Destiny. It is full of cruelty and heroic endurance, of adventure and debasement ; alike in the wealth § n.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 5 and glory of the few and the misery of the many, it reminds us of the Napoleonic battlefields, though the conscripts of industriahsm had no eagles to lead, or drums to cheer, them to the grave. And in the one case, as in the other, our own life is so built upon the results that we can hardly imagine history taking a different course. II. The Three Factors When George III came to the throne, England was far behind Western Europe in many of the elements of civilization. Country life was isolated and stagnant. The towns were ill-built, insanitary, and ill-governed. Transport and travel were hardly better than in the later Roman Empire. The industrial arts were little developed ; coal, iron, and steel were known, but little used. Within two generations these conditions were transformed. To understand the process of the remaking of the British nation, we must get the important ele- ments into closer outline and more logical order. In doing so, there are opposite perils to be avoided. The pre- Victorian economists translated the infi- nitely complex play of wants and wills which is our daily life into an infinitely simple play of abstract factors, wherein a thousand little mistakes cumulated at last into a fatal falsification. The Victorian hero-worshippers wove the facts into a fairy-tale, in which Kay and Arkwright, Watt and Stephenson had brave parts, and Sir Gorgius Midas 6 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. made a splendid ogre. This was as false, if less mischievous. It seemed to overstate the case ; really it understated it, save as to the inventors, who were, in fact, the servants, not the masters, of the moving forces of the industrial revolution. There is a portion of truth in both extremes, the economic and the romantic ; the task of history is to unite them. We must use abstractions, for symbols are necessary to obtain simple statements of complex developments ; but, in using them, we must bear in mind that these formulae stand not for mathematical, but for vital quantities, individuals never twice the same, groups ever changing in their composition, both groups and individuals exhibit- ing in their variation a tendency which we, in the vague optimism which we have inherited, still call progress. The conjunction of three main factors was necessary to this radical transformation — (a )surplus ; Cagjtal, (b) surplus Labour, (c) a new Market. f| Whenever these major quantities come together, .;the lesser conditions, such as Invention, better I Communications, and a favourable State Policy, I will soon appear. There is a world of diffCTence', however, between a happy wedding and a forced union of economic instruments. It is not im- possible to imagine a conjunction of the three factors which would proceed amicably, regularly, with little pain, to the general advantage. But few, if any, of the great economic changes known to history answer to that description ; and what § II.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 7 began to happen at the end of the eighteenth century in England is as far as possible from de- serving it. The experience of a hundred years has abundantly justified the expectation of the founders of the new political economy that a vast increase of national wealth would result from what they called economic " freedom " ; but it has failed to realize their prophecy that a higher social harmony would spontaneouly arise. It is a tale of expansion not along a straight, smooth path, but by violent oscillations, involving larger and larger numbers of people, bringing pure gain to few, pure loss to many, a mingling of gain and loss, in which it is hard to strike a balance, to most. Perhaps there was a deep wisdom in the Parisian trinity where- in Equality and Fraternity were linked with the idea of Liberty. A Utopian speculator would say that, had the main agents of the economic trans- formation met upon more equal terms, the gain would have been greater and the loss less grievous ; but then there would have been no such thing as the Industrial Revolution. They were no more equal than the greed of Dives and the need of Lazarus. It was their very inequality that pro- duced their conjunction ; and for long the machines which groimd out calico or iron rails may be said to have been manufacturing also new forms of inequality between Capital and Labour, and between these partners in production and the Consumer, the Market. 8 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. l. III. The New Capitalism The accumulation of mercantile and manufactur- ing profits had proceeded apace, and Avith no more than temporary checks, for two centuries. The rapidity with which London was rebuilt after the Great Fire in 1666, and the speedy recovery from the collapse of the " bubble " companies about 1721, are among many signs of the large resources of the rising merchant class. At a time when poli- tical influence rested mainly on landownership, there was a natural tendency for merchants to desire to become country gentlemen ; and this was stimulated by possibilities of profitable invest- ment which may be traced to the corn export bounty, first added in 1689 to the protective import duties. Of some of the results that followed we shall speak more fully at a later point. The era of scientific agriculture began : new implements, new crops and effective rotation, better breeds of cattle, new buildings and methods of organization, were adopted. Striking successes encouraged the movement, which became more and more capital- istic in character. It tended more and more, that is to say, to the enlargement of farms and the substitution of large managership for small owner- ship, since, in agriculture as in manufacture, enlargement of the business enables economies to be effected, crises to be weathered, the highest skill to be hired, and sales to be made at the most advantageous time and place. Undoubtedly, the § ni.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 9 advance of agricultural science in the later eighteenth century was a national asset, though one dearly bought at the cost of the Enclosure Acts and the Com Laws. But it was in trade and manufacture that the most characteristic developmeiits of capitalism occurred. Ever freer access to the Asiatic and American continents brought a multiplicity of fresh commodities, and a corresponding demand for home manufactures to exchange for them. Stimulated by the skilLof jQj:eign immigrants, it created new crafts or processes. Stimulated by foreign rivalries, it created British seamanship and a "thousand devices of the counting-house. The establishment of the Bank of England in 1694, while entrenching capitalism in the very structure of the State — ^that was the price we had to pay for the early development of parliamentary control — fostered credit, investment, and insurance, to the general benefit of the nation. In this, as in other ways, England bettered some very ancient examples (let us rather say that Britain bettered them, for the full union of England and Scotland was a most important element in the matter Ireland was long to play Cinderella to her unkind sisters). Regular trading with borrowed capital now became possible on a large scale. Joint-stock corapanies, owning no local ties or customary restrictions, sprang up for the most various commercial purposes as the eighteenth century progressed ; and, though they were not yet 10 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. organized for manufacture, the uncertainty of distant ventures in a lawless time must have directed many minds toward bolder experiment in home production. The strong localization of life, outwardly marked by the difficulty and cost of transit and transport, and the remains of guilds and other forms of quasi- medieval regulation, were among the chief obstacles which hindered the enterprising man of means. If his name had not been legion, he would have been longer powerless against this inertia. But medieval conceptions of the good social order were in the article of death. They scarcely breathed, except in the obscurity of the countryside. The British Islands were built by Nature for trade ; let there be any considerable growth of population, and the foreign commerce which is fatal to a static and regulated society must follow. The State, as it became able to protect the more usual trading routes, grew more chary of granting the charters and monopolies which had represented its utmost patronage in earlier days. To this extent, commerce was free. There remained risks, obstructions, and losses in this outreaching of national energy almost unimaginable to-day. Seizure of valuable cargoes and vessels was a daily incident of the wars with France. Shipwreck and piracy were common. Smuggling was pursued on a vast scale. Every long voyage was a dangerous adventure. But the profits were commensurate with the risks ; and the profits continued to be high when the risks fell, § m.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 11 when marine insurance became customary, and banking facilities removed the more glaring temp- tations to highway robbery and housebreaking. Of the policy of the State, it may at least be said that it was less mischievous than that of any rival country. Walpole had aimed above all to stimulate capitalist trading, and had .greatly suc- ceeded. Until the later part of the eighteenth century, in agricultural resources the country was nearly self-sufficing ; it was against the manu- facturers, not the landlords, that Adam Smith directed his sharpest shafts. " By extorting from the Legislature bounties upon the exportation of their own linen, high duties upon the importation of all foreign linen, and a total prohibition of the home consumption of some sorts of French linen, they endeavour to sell their own goods as dear as possible. By encouraging the importation of foreign linen yam, and thereby bringing it into competition with that which is made by our own people, they endeavour to buy the work of the poor spinners as cheap as possible. They are as intent to keep down the wages of their own weavers as the earnings of the poor spinners ; and it is by no means for the benefit of the work that they endeavour to raise the price of the complete work or to lower that of the rude materials. It is the industry which is carried on for the benefit of the rich and the powerful that is principally encouraged by our mercantile system. That which is carried on for the benefit of the poor and the 12 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. t. indigent is too often either neglected or oppressed." ^ The Navigation Acts and kindred legislation penalized the British people, and produced some strange anomalies — ^for instance, there was said to be, about 1790, some £70,000,000 of capital invested in the West Indian trade, and only £18,000,000 in the East Indian. Yet these laws were unquestion- ably effective in keeping large populations, during a critical period, in economic subjection to British shippers, traders, and manufacturers. When the policy of monopoly received the crushing blow of American Independence, it was its political sponsors rather than its commercial beneficiaries who suffered. The United States were to be long dependent on the island factory and money market. On the other hand, India, which was to remain politically dependent, did not very long suffer from the sort of rapacity that disgraced British traders in the eighteenth century, and received a clean and regular government nearly as soon as the new manu- facturing cities of Northern England. There is one other chief obstruction to the growth of capital to be noted. Warfare cost heavily, not only at the time, but in permanent debt. Yet England suffered less from war than Spain, Hol- land, France, or Germany. There is, perhaps, no stranger contrast in the length and breadth of history than that of Germany, under native auto- crats, ravaged by war after war — the Thirty Years War (1618-48), wars with France (1672-97), the > The Wealth of Nations, Book IV. ohap. vill. § IV.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 13 War of the Spanish Succession (1701-14), the Silesian Wars (1740-5), the Seven Years War (1756-63),\ the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars — and England, under the strictly limited Hanoverians, ) enjoying practically unbroken domestic peace. \ The Whig settlement had many ugly features ; ' this immeasurable blessing overshadows them all. By the opportunity it gave for improvement in agriculture and the industrial arts, and the assurance of social order, security, and legal development, the long maintenance of peace on British soil must be accounted an all-important factor in the accumu- lation of fluid wealth which gave England a more than military primacy among the nations. IV. The Market, and the Inventors Two factors, of which the one largely determined the early direction of capitalist industry, and the other provided its characteristic instruments, may be briefly noticed before we consider the influence of events upon Labour. For the first time, England came, in the eighteenth century, to depend, to a large extent, upon foreign countries for her markets. The full meaning of this change is not always appreciated. It meant in particular three things. (1) Since England was, by far and long, first in the Held, it meant an expansion so rapid that men were intoxicated, and often "Brutalized, by the possibili- ties of selfish gain. Customary scruples, for ages sanctified by the Church and enforced by the 14 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. State, were thrown off as mere superstition and sentimentality. The plunder of India affords a terrible illustration of this fact ; the traffic which for a century carried 20,000 negroes a year into Western slavery is another. When Holland fell out of the race, and France was beaten in India and Canada, native populations numbering hundreds of millions began to be opened to the approach of the English manufacturer ; and for many years, while Europe was riven with war, he was without any effective rival. It is this unprecedented opportunity which called the in- ventors and factory lords into being. (2) It was necessarily a capitalistic expausionj because distant foreign trade could not be effectively exploited on any other lines. A Co-operative Wholesale Society can to-day own tropical estates for the provision of raw material, lines of steamships to bring it home, and factories to work it up. Such a thing was beyond the highest dreams of eighteenth- century enlightenment. Foreign trade had bred fluid capital, because, even in a time of high risks, it gave the largest profits and promised the largest increase. Here neither law nor custom obstructed the play of crude energy in the arts of selling, and every improvement of organization yielded an immense reward. The independent craftsman could not hope to compass such an effort. (3) The character of the new machine trades was "leffgely determined by this new type of market. India, for instance, demanded cotton clothing ; it could § IV.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 15 take unlimited quantities of very cheap goods. Since cotton does not grow in England, and is of less value than wool in the English climate, it had received none of those embarrassing attentions from Parliament which were reserved for com- modities in which grower, manufacturer, and consumer had all claims to protection. This proved another great advantage for foreign trade. CoaJ-mining and iron-smelting were also recently developed, and very fre^ from restriction ; they offered the advantage of abundant native supplies, and they, also, required, in the main, only uniform routine processes to make them marketable. From the first, therefore, the Industrial Revolu- tion was mainly concerned with relatively low- grade goods, portable and durable, of which the raw material is abundant, which ask little training or' special skill in the labourers, are sure of a large and steady demand, and, in an unregulated market, require no consideration except cheapness. Although many of the inventors were working- men who created others' wealth, but themselves lived and died in poverty, it is proper to name here the chief steps, before the end of the eighteenth century, in that process of mechanical invention which, by magnifying the business unit, definitely severed the labourer from possession of the in- struments of production. These inventions were, broadly, of two kinds— improvement of old tools and the creation of new, and the application to these tools of non-human motive power, first that of running 16 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. water, then of steam. Every step must be en- visaged, not as something sensationally new, but as a link in a long chain, and as involving other far-reaching changes — improvements of communi- cations (roads, canals, shipping), of banking and market facilities, and so on. Coal was not new; iron was not new ; the idea of the steam-engine was not new ; Jack of Newbury had a clothing factory in the time of Henry VII, and employed a thousand hands, some of whom he led to Flodden. What was new and fateful was the marriage of these agents under the direction of personal wealth. Two groups of trades are of supreme importance, and react continually upon each other — the mjnera l and textile groups. The woollen manufacturenad for centuries -been the largest and most favoured of national industries ; but the chief textile inven- tions were only very slowly transferred to it from the cotton trade. This fact has usually been attributed to the very insignificance of cotton at the outset, and its consequent freedom from regulation. There is another reason. Supplies of raw wool cannot be multiplied nearly as rapidly as those of cotton, and can never be so cheap. The wool trade, therefore, offered no such possi- bility of vast and rapid development for low-grade markets. In 1733, Kay patented his fly-shuttle, and in 1738 Wyatt patented his roller-spinning machine worked by water-power ; but neither of these inventions seems to have come into use, perhaps because they were not perfected. No § IV.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 17 marked advance was made till 1764, when a Black- burn weaver, James Hargreave, made his.&mrmmg- jenny, a frame carrying a number of spindlesTeH ij^^achine, which gave ten times as much yarn as the hand-spinning wheel. Five years later — ^in the birth-year of Napoleon and Wellington — ^Arkwright perfected Wyatt's " water frame " ; and in 1775 he took out patents for carding, drawing, roving, and spinning machines. By this time, which may be considered the end of the preliminary period, the import of cotton had increased threefold in forty-five years. In the next twenty-five years, it increased nearly tenfold. In 1779, another working spinner, Samuel Crompton, produced a hybrid machine, the ",jnule," which gave a finer yarn by combining the jenny and the water-frame. Finally, in 1785, Cartwright brought the weaving up to the level of the new spinning process by his invention of the power-loom, first applied to wool yam.i ~ ~ In the same year, Arkwright's patent expired, and Watt and Boulton made their first steam- engine for a Nottingham cotton mill. It was not successfully applied to the power-loom till 1801. Watt was not the inventor of the steam-engine; indeed, very few of the inventors could hit upon an absolutely new idea. Crude appliances moved by steam had existed for centuries. Thomas Savery had made the first commercially successful steam-pump in 1693. It was very wasteful ; and 1 For a short explanation of these processes, see post, pp. 88-93- B i^ MODERN ENGLANt) [chap. i. Newcomen greatly improved it in 1705. Grandson of a teacher of mathematics, and son of an instru- ment maker, Watt was prevented from opening a scientific instrument shop in Glasgow by the Cor- poration of Hammermen, on the ground that he had not served an apprenticeship. He was, how- ever, appointed maker to the University ; and in his workshop there he was called on to repair a model of Newcomen's " fire " engine, which had been adapted about 1736 (by Jonathan Hull) for rotary motion. He soon afterwards became engineering adviser to the Carron Foundry. The essence of Watt's first invention (1769) was the condensation in a vessel separate from the steam cylinder ; and his later improvements depended on the expansive use of steam. He also invented the " indicator," and many other appliances, and discovered the composition of water, possibly earlier than Cavendish. Watt and his loyal and courageous partner, Boulton, enjoyed their patents, though they had to defend them in costly law-suits, till 1800. The first considerable use of their steam- engine was at pumping in Cornish tm-mines, which were thus given a new lease of life. We have followed the usual, but hardly the logical, order in our narrative, for the development of the new machinery and the new motive power depended upon coal and iron being brought into their service. Abraham Darby first made iron with coke in 1735 ; Benjamin Huntsman succeeded in casting steel ingots from crucibles in Sheffield in 1740 ; and § IV.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 19 iron rails were cast at the Coalbrookdale works in 1767. But it was not till the 'eighties that effective smelting was "ca^ri^d on in large blast iurnaces, using pit-coal and coke. The building of a cast- iron bridge over the Severn in 1779, and Cort's inventions for puddling and rolling in 1783, may be regarded as opening the iron era. In 1740, there were fifty-nine furnaces using charcoal, with an average annual output of about 300 tons each. Fifty years later, there were eighty-five furnaces with an average output of 800 tons. By the end of the century, the manufacture was definitely transferred to the neighbourhood of the coal beds, and timber had practically ceased to be used for fuel. Yet again, the general use of coal necessitate^d a general improvement of roads and other com- munications ; and this, in turn, favoured the new capitalist farming. The neglect of the British coal-beds, which were known to the Romans and slightly scratched in intervening centuries, affords, perhaps, the best single illustration of the inertia of medieval life, and the slowness of the awakening to modern opportunities. Early in the eighteenth century, there was an important coal trade from Newcastle by coasting vessels. But it was only when^ Newcomen's steam-pump and Watt's more perfect's engine had made possible the deepening of mines and easier haulage that it was possible to feed the new factories with steam power. So MODERN ENGLAND [csap. i. V. Labour on the Land There was surplus labour ready by the time steam-driven machinery was ready, and there were ever new stocks of surplus labour for many years afterwards, because the masses of the English j people were in process of demoralization, and because a demoralized population breeds quickly. i This demoralization arose from a number of very diverse influences, of which we must take two groups first, because of their jerermanent and far- reaching effects. These are ti^ebchanges in^agri- culture which had been pijoqeeding slowly since Elizabethan times, and t&e changes^in domestic industry, especially, but not solely, as associated with agriculture, with certain social changes involved in these. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, although agricultural enclosure and improvement had been long proceeding, a full half, perhaps more, of the cultivated area — a quarter of the whole area— of England was still held communally. Its fields were tilled, and its meadows, woodlands, and moors were enjoyed, either jointly, or in division by agreement or lot, under regulations of the unit of local government, the court of the manor. The word " common " has come to mean waste land ; but, although some of the best lands had then already been obtained in full private ownership by wealthy individuals under one form of authority or another, there was still § v.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 21 enough in common possession to give a real, if meagre security of life to the village poor. The cottagers often owned their humble homes, and small patches of land attached to or near them ; they had customary rights, including pasture, turf, and fuel — ^this last a most important benefit before the days of cheap coal. The absolutely landless man, outside the towns, was exceptional. There might be, in a typical village, say Mr. and Mrs. Hammond,^ four large, twenty-four mode- rate, twenty-four small proprietors, and sixty-six cottagers with common rights. In an open-field village, there would be few day labourers without either land or common rights ; and " the most important social fact about this system is that it provided opportunities for the humblest and poorest labourer to rise in the village." The appearance of the capitalistic landlords meant death to this ancient order. They had none of the patriarchal compunctions of the feudal noble; and, since the power of the Crown was effectually limited, they had little restraint to fear. The hand of the Tudors had been heavy upon the people ; but it had penalized the conversion of arable into pasture land, and the neglect of cottages and cottage allotments. It had established apprenticeship and a legal relation between wages and prices ; it had imposed upon every parish the duty of employing or main- taining its poor. Since 1688, the landlords were • The Village Ldbower, pp. 32-3. 22 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. supreme. Parliament, whether under Whig or Tory management, was their very willing servitor. They controlled the Crown, Church, Judiciary, and local government. Horace Walpole, George Selwyn, and other gossips of the period have left us such naive pictures of the proceedings at Westminster when Enclosure Bills were in Com- mittee, that the homilies generally accepted at the time by respectable townsfolk about the idleness and naughty insubordination of the com- moners can no longer deceive. Another recent writer. Professor E. C. K. Gonner,^ takes a more conservative view of the subject than Mr. and Mrs. Hammond, and, while admitting " the partial extinction of the yeomen and small farmers," " a temporary pressure on poor relief," a rapid diminution of small independent holders, and an increase of wage work, questions " the accusation of general arbitrary or unfair treatment of the small farmer or the poor owner." The usual conclusion of economic students has been more severe.^ Between 1700 and 1760, under 200 Acts, 287,845 acres, mainly of common field, and 74,518 acres of waste only, were compulsorily enclosed. In the next forty years, the Acts numbered 2000, and the areas enclosed 2,428,721 acres of common field, and 752,150 acres of waste. 1 Common Land and Jndosure, 1912. » Many contemporary witnesses are cited by Prof. Cunningham in chapters vil. 16, and vli. 3, of his Growth of English Industry and Commerce in Modern Times, § v.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 23 Very few of the poor villagers had any effective voice in the process. They were helpless victims. They could not follow the Commissioners through their long inquiries. Few of them had capital enough to work larger holdings. The only real excuse for the men who used their monopoly of political power so ruthlessly lies in the panic fear that famine would succeed where Napoleon could not, unless large-scale agriculture met the need. " By nineteen out of twenty Inclosure Bills, the poor are injured, and some grossly injured," said Arthur Young, in 1801, himself, in earlier years, one of the foremost advocates of the enlargement of estates. It is not denied that the allotments by which the dispossessed commoners were to be compensated were inadequate, and were so saddled with law costs, and costs of fencing and draining (especially before the Consolidating Act of 1801 eased the process), that the recipients were forced to sell out for trifling sums which enabled them to move into town or to emigrate. Dr Cunningham remarks that " the enquiries of the Board of Agriculture embodied in their 'General Report on Enclosures,' published in 1808, appear to be decisive " as to the ruin of many of the poorer inhabitants. The obstinate and violent resistance not infrequently offered to the enclosure of wastes is eloquent of popular feeling ; indeed, the whole after-course of events becomes inex- plicable if the existence of an immense and extreme grievance be questioned. 24 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. I It was not only that the humble tillers of the common field were turned into labourers, with no other resource than a daily wage, under a Settlement Law which either chained them to their parishes or forbade them any hope of social aid. The small tenant farmers felt simultaneously the rise of rents, the competition of large farms, and the pressure of increasing poor rates. They reduced labour to a minimum, demolished cottages by way of preventing pauper settlement — " that they may never become the nests, as they are called, of beggar brats," says Arthur Young — and, finally, came to rely upon the monstrous privileges of the Corn Law. Bad seasons in the latter half of the eighteenth century led to violent fluctuations of corn prices ; and, while large farmers could gain by speculation, the small men were overwhelmed. " The progress of agricultural im- provements left its mark by drawing hard and fast lines of cleavage between the classes in rural society ; the smaller farmer who succumbed in the struggle was all the more to be pitied because the labouring class in which he had been merged was entering on a terrible period of privation and degradation." ^ ' Cunningham : The Industrial Sevolulion, p. 662. Arnold Toynbee says : " By Eden's time [1795] the practice of eviction had be- come general, and the connection between eviction and pauperiam is an indisputable fact, though it has been overlooked by most writers " (Industrial Revolution, p. 80). § VI.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 25 VI. The Transformation of Industry We must retrace our steps for a moment to a point at which the new forces in agriculture and manufacture meet. The old-time village was the home of many industries. In the first place, the cottagers made clothes, furniture, farm appliances, tools, and other wares for themselves and their neighbours ; and there were regular small district trades — thatching, carpenter- ing, saddlery, and so on. Secondly, there were spinning and weaving and frame-work knitting for a wider market, under a transitional system in which the weaver, for instance, sometimes bought yarn from an independent spinner, and himself sold the cloth to a elethier ; sometimes worked up yarn belonging to a merchant, who took the cloth in payment. The merchant was the midwife of the capitalist system. In isolated villages, the cloth trade could continue on the old lines ; its very wide diffusion thraugh the country seems to have been motived in part by the desire to be independent of the moneyed employer. Where craftsmen were locally concen- trated, his control developed ; and the intro- duction of costly machinery put hard pressure upon the independent worker. In the Eastern and Western counties, there was least power of resistance. In Yorkshire, the substantial farmer- weavers were able to adopt both the fly-shuttle and the hand-jenny, and readily did so ; it was 26 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. only when, about 1794, the cloth dealers began to build factories on a large scale, and with the introduction of steam-power, that domestic industry was definitely doomed. This is the most familiar, but not, of course, the only, type of the revolution in industry. Some old manufactures, like that of iron, necessarily capitalist in character, were also revolutionized. New trades like gun-making, paper-making, and glass-making, could only be founded by wealthy employers. In other cases, expensive materials or tools were an important factor. Poor men could not easily buy raw silk ; and they bought all materials at a disadvantage. In Scotland, the linen manufacture depended upon chartered company banking. We shall see in a later chapter that, while the hosiery trade pursued a more even course than other textiles, a class of employers early rose who owed their profits and power to their ownership of machines which they let out to home workers, rather than to skill of organiza- tion or possession of materials. Some of the worst troubles of the eighteenth century occurred in this trade when the practice of apprenticing workhouse children began. The stocking-knitters, to defend their standard of pay, fought to maintain the traditional and legal limitation of apprentices. They failed, and in their despair set an evil and foolish example of machine-breaking, too often to be followed in the next half century. The principles of laisser faire have been so ably § VI.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 27 expressed and defended, they so long enjoyed authority in the national thought, that, even now, when their force is spent, it is difficult for us to regard sympathetically the effort of the artisans to maintain the customary regulations. That this effort was long and heroically supported, recent research has made clear ; and it is certain that it was based upon what had once been a universally accepted tradition. In their hey-day, the craft guilds embodied the assumption of a common interest of masters, manual workers, and consumers, as well as the interest of the State in the maintenance of social peace. There were always workers who were not embraced in this privileged sphere ; still, the guilds set the standard, and that with the full support (perhaps as the agents) of the municipality, and the full coun- tenance of the State. That a living wage should be secured to the workers was as essential to this idea as that the masters should get profit, or the consumers quality and a reasonable price. That every one might hope to become a master was as essential as that every one must first be a servant. All round, a standard of life had to be maintained. As occupations not susceptible of guild organization (transport and extractive labour, for instance) increased, and as, first, the capitalist middleman, and, then, the factory employer broke through the ring protecting the skilled crafts, a totally new conception grew up, chal- lenging the old at every point. We may date 28 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. the change, broadly, as occurring between the middle of the seventeenth and the middle of the eighteenth centuries. At first, the opposition was only vaguely realized, but gradually it defined itself — an ideal of individual profit against an ideal of social co-operation. There were good arguments on both sides ; but circumstance favoured increasingly the free initiative. The workers saw the hope of rising to be employers fade away, and independent home industry become nearly impossible. They appealed to law : they might as well have appealed to the North Wind. The magisterial assessment of wages seems to have been generally abandoned by 1750 ; but a new statute was passed for the West of England clothing trade in 1756, and an Act was adopted to enforce wage-rates among the Spital- fields weavers as late as 1773. This was an exception ; the social ideal was already defeated, and three years later Adam Smith's great work fell upon ground well prepared to receive the seeds of the doctrine of freedom of contract and laisser faire. Amid the terrible suffering of the end of the century, there was, as we shall see, a short-lived revival of the demand for a State- regulated wage, both among agricultural and industrial labourers. The Arbitration Act of 1800 authorized the enforcement of rates fixed by arbitrators for the cotton weavers, but the measure proved inoperative. In 1808, a fresh effort was made, without effect ; and in 1813, § VI.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 29 the wages clauses of the Elizabethan statute were repealed, in the teeth of working-class opposition supported by many magistrates and employers, and practically at the dictation of Ricardo and other economists. The unequal battle continued rather longer on the indirect issue of apprentices. The crafts, during the latter half of the eighteenth century, were being flooded with untrained men, women, and children, often brought by premium from the poor-house. With pathetic bravery, the opera- tives struggled against this competition. No doubt, the Statute of Apprentices was sometimes an obstruction to the improvement of trade pro- cesses. But, so long as it held, " the" country stood possessed of a great system of general training and technical instruction ; great, because whatever were its shortcomings, apprenticeship contributed annually to the wealth of the nation a large number of skilled workmen, and moulded the character of a vast number of English boys, whom it sent out into the world with the ability to keep themselves from want and unemploy- ment." 1 Time was when English life rested upon this base. Every employer had himself had to pass through the seven years' training. It was a conservative regime, unfavourable to the bold innovator, as well as to the unscrupulous and extortionate. Among other social effects, 1 English Apprenticeship and Child Labour, by 0. Jooelyn Dunlop, p. 223. 30 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. l. apprenticeship must have been an important in- fluence in postponing marriage, and, so, in limiting the increase of population. The growth of cottage manufactures shook the guild system ; the herding of workers into public mills as mere machine- tenders destroyed it. Unfortunately, there was no statesmanship equal to the work of adapting old institutions to new needs. A few exceptional craftsmen might foresee the storm that was coming, and migrate into a more fortunate occupation. The mass of them could but cry, with the sad hymn- writer, " change and decay in all around I see," and bear the suffering they could not avoid. The new machinery did not need highly trained hands to work it ; quality either became a negligible matter, or was secured by the perfection of the mechanical process. Apprenticeship continued in a modified form in the trades requiring great manual skill ; elsewhere, until the repeal of the Elizabethan Statute, in 1813, it was too often a cloak for sweat- ing and fraudulent indenture. , .....Xhis^^^'S-theJDirtkdajL-QLIrade-TTnionism. There had long been local friendly societies of ^workmen for sick and funeral benefits, and for the aid of members tramping in search of work. What created Trade Unionism proper was the transforma- tion of associated and regulated into divided and unregulated industry, and therewith the need of some means of maintaining the reward of labour. The average worker had first lost his privileges as a member of a guild, and had then lost his inde- § n.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 31 pendent position as cottage craftsman, by the loss of his common rights and the impossibility of competing with factory machines. If man was not to be a mere commodity, ever cheapening in price like iron or cotton, he must have some sort of ' defence against a class of capitalist employers who made no pretence to humanitarian scruples. The pioneers were among the West of England woollen workers and the Midland frame-work knitters. Their appeal to the Government was vain ; but every failure made the issue clearer and scattered the spirit of combination. There was a classic struggle in the Glasgow cotton trade. At a cost of £3000, the operatives succeeded in getting a wage scale fixed by the magistrates. The employers refused to accept it, and 40,000 weavers went on strike. The movement was broken by the arrest of the whole Strike Committee, and the imprison- ment of five of the leaders for terms of from five to eighteen months. ^ At length, the greed of employers was reinforced by political alarm ; and, by Acts of 1 799 and 1800, all labour combination was prohibited. "™~ The Acts of 1720-25,, .pjccMiLting_cpmMnatioM o f wor kmen, to raise wages (7 Geo. I, c. 13, among journeymen tailors in London ; 12 Geo. I, c. 34, among woollen workers ; 12 Geo. I, c. 35, among brickmakers and tilers) had given a foretaste of the ruthlessness of industrial capitalism. The researches of Prof. Thorold Rogers and others show that, 1 Webb, History oj Trade Unionism, chap. i. 32 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. t. at that time, the ordinary peasant or artisan could gain no more than a subsistence out of the current wages. By 1750, there was a distinct improvement. Agriculture was still the predomi- nant occupation ; much of the land was in the hands of the people ; and land and domestic industries together offered a citadel of personal independence, an assurance that town artisans would not be generally underbid by country paupers. Rents and prices were low ; the con- dition of the labouring classes was better than at any time in the near past, and better than it to be until quite recent years. | But, while the^ effect of enclosure was to give more employment in fencing, drainage, and building, the second and lasting effect was to reduce the amount of labour needed, and this just when domestic industry was beginning to collapse. At the same tii]^|ihe small farmer was hit by the rapid riS£-Of rents due to the progress of high farming, anra^by a succession of bad seasons. It was not altogether a base material- ism that led the governing class in this emergency to favour manufacturers by repressing labour agitation, and farmers by making bread dear. Economic ignorance was even more rife than greed for selfish gain. Dark clouds lowered on all the seas ; and everything was sacrificed for a full Treasury. War taxes and prices rose together. Thus, it was injthejnost^griesxflislyijinfavourable circurastances^ tha^the_comcidence of rural_ disruption with the collapse of industrial regulation occurred. § VII.] THE GEEAT DISRUPTION 33 VII. The Victims : Speenhamland Poverty and riches were manufactured together. Free competition was now the ideal of everyone above " the lower classes," an ideal preached fana- tically, and practised with a cold determination. It was very quickly found that, for many mechanical processes, women and children were as good as men ; and the imprisonment and torture of chil- dren in factories — ^the most characteristic form of criminality in the next generation — ^had become common before the end of the eighteenth century. The adult victims, uneducated, voteless, forbidden to combine peacefully, robbed of the old safeguards, sometimes struck out blindly in retaliation. As early as 1779, a spinning mill of Arkwright's was wrecked. The troops were brought out ; pitched battles were fought. A savage criminal code was strained to its worst ; on one day, fourteen rioters were hanged. Slowly, despair settled down on the countryside. Even the last resort of the evicted, the Poor Law, was made an engine of degradation. Its very vir- tues, in the change of time, became vices. In the great legislation completed in 1601, the duty of finding work or sustenance for the very poor had been expressed, necessarily, in the terms of a static society, a life highly localized, and governed by tradition. Poor relief was drawn from local rates, limited to local residents, and administered by the justices of the peace and parish officers. Doles were general ; but the justices could and c 34 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. did keep down prices, import supplies of corn, buy materials and tools for the destitute to work with, and force farmers and manufacturers, even at a loss, to keep their customary number of hands.^ It was, after the Civil War, a natural development of this system which, by the Act of 1662, declared that a pauper could obtain relief only from the parish where, by forty days' residence (some other conditions were added in later legislation), he had gained a " settlement." It was only when society was falling to pieces, and freedom of movement had become essential for bread-winning, that it could be said : " There is scarce a poor man in England of forty years of age who has not, in some part of his life, felt himself most cruelly oppressed by this ill-contrived law of settlements." ^ The fixing of wages by assessment of the justices in quarter-sessions was older still, having been an incidental provision of the Act of Appren- tices of 1563. Certainly, it is not to be supposed that the magistrates, themselves employers, would be at any time too generous in the scales of pay- ment they prBdaimed. All these arrangements — apprenticeship, wages assessment, and poor relief by settlement — are to be regarded as part of a paternal system of governing a stationary society based on common ownership of the land. Poverty was the lot of the masses * ; yet it did not commonly 1 The Early History of English Poor Law Relief, by E. M. Leonard. * Adam Smith : Wealth of Nations, Book I. chap. x. * King and Davenant, at the end of the seventeenth century, § VII.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 35 mean shame and barbarity ; it was greatly softened by custom and religion, and humanized by personal relations. Now, the great landslide had carried away nearly the whole of this structure. Things — money and machines — were in the saddle, and rode mankind. The land had become the land- lords', and the abundance thereof. They were not rich on the scale of their latter-day successors ; for there were few coal-mines, great cities could not yet be laid under tribute, safe and lucrative investments were rare, company directorships and stock-exchange gambling were hardly dreamed of. But they held the substance of political power ; they protected their families by strict settlement and primogeniture, and strengthened them by inter- marriage with wealthy merchants. Ancient duties sank into abeyance ; noblemen, and even the lesser gentry, spent much of their time and money in London or abroad. Estates were property, farming was a business, like any other. The poor man had no property, no business, and no protection. The King and the Privy Council, who once might have helped him, had been pushed into the background by the Cabinet and the Parliament of landlords and merchants. Apprenticeship was going. The gilds were passing away, or losing all sense of their social purpose. Only relief by settlement, estimated the number of paupers and beggars at 1,330,000 in a population of 5,500,000. But suck estimates are of little value; and Maoaulay's deduction from them is merely an instance of early Victorian smugness. 36 MODERN ENGLAliTD [chap. i. with a half-forgotten power for assessing wages, re- mained. Settlement, however, meant impossibility of moving in search of the moving work, now largely transferred from the Eastern and Western counties to the North ; or, conversely, the search for work involved the loss of the only claim upon poor relief.^ The blackest mark against the name of the younger Pitt is not that he bltmdered in his esti- mate of the power of France, or that he persisted in drinking too much port, but that he never under- stood the condition of his own people, and did not seriously attempt to grapple with the gravest problem of the day. The story goes that, during a visit to Halstead in Essex, he embarrassed his host by descanting with satisfaction on the pros- perity of the people. On the following day, they took a walk in the town ; and the statesman ex- claimed, in astonishment, that he had no conception England could in any part present such a spectacle of misery. After emptying his pockets in alms, he returned to London persuaded that something must be done. This was in 1795, when he had been twelve years in power, when financial diffi- culties were already pressing, when wheat was at 108 shDlings, and the King was being received in the streets with cries of " Bread ! " and " Peace ! " Pitt brought in a perfunctory Bill for the formation 1 In 1795 some gross abuses of the law of settlement were abolished, the removal of sick persons being forbidden, and the remoyal of any persons until they had actually become chargeable to the rates. § VII.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 37 of " schools of industry," and the supply of cows to the remaining small farmers and commoners. The meastire was ridiculed, and withdrawn. But something must be done. The first half of the eighteenth century had shown the possibilities of a severe administration of the Poor Law. Relief could be refused if applicants would not go into the workhouse, where there was one. Contractors were engaged to farm out the relief, indoor and outdoor. In many parishes the number of cottages was reduced to a minimum so that as few persons as possible might become chargeable on the rates. " There was a regular crusade against the half- vagrant, half-pauper class that subsisted on the commons ; and the tendency of the authorities was to treat their poverty as a crime." ^ Repres- sion, however, though it may disperse, does not cure social disease ; and this disease of poverty was steadily growing. The administrative reaction centring in Gilbert's Act of 1782, and in what came to be known as the S pgenhamland policv, was not mainly, as has sometimes been suggested, due to sentimentality, but grew out of the necessities of , the case, in the absence of truer remedies. Gilbert's Act enabled the parishes which adopted it to form themselves into unions for the building of work- houses ; the church-wardens and overseers were now only to raise rates, while guardians and jus- tices of the peace directed the work of relief. The Act practically removed the workhouse test, and ' Cunningham, p. 578. 38 MODERN ENGLAND [csap. t. encouraged able-bodied men to seek work by promis- ing tojjsupplement their wages by parish allowances. Ten years later, with the problem becoming more and more acute — the annual cost of relief rose in this decade from a million and a half to two mil- lion pounds — a feeling had grown up throughout Southern England in favour of a revival of the practice of fixing wages judicially in proportion to the price of corn. The Suffolk justices petitioned Parliament for legislation in this sense ; but all authoritative opinion was hostile. Samuel Whit- bread, a Radical before Radicalism was possible, introduced a Minimum Wage Bill, but to no purpose. We have seen how Pitt's tardy and inade- quate proposal failed. Fox was more sympathetic, but was powerless. Malthus scolded the " gentle- men and clergymen " who countenanced what he thought a revolutionary ideal. Burke declared that wages must be left to find their level, and that " the Squires of Norfolk had dined when they gave it as their opinion that the rate of wages might, or ought to, rise with the market of provisions." For almost the last time in English life, the country gentlemen took it into their own hands to work a great social change. Speenhamland, near Newbury, now long sunk into insignificanceTwas then a busy point on the Southampton, Bath,"and Ox- ford coach routes. More than forty coaches passed through it daily ; passengers broke their journey at its prosperous hostelries ; and in 1802 a theatre § VII.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 39 was built for their pleasure. It was at the Pehcan feSc^f which Quinn said it might well be so called "from its enormous bill" — ^that the Berkshire Magistrates held their famous meeting, on May 6th, 1795. They advised the farmers to increase labourers' wages in proportion to food prices, and, failing this, resolved themselves to make allowances out of the rates in aid of wages upon a regular scale in like proportion, namely, " when the gallon loaf of seconds flour, weighing 8 Bbs. 11 oz., shall cost Is., then every poor and industrious man shall have for his own support 3s. weekly, either pro- cured by his own or his family's labour, or an allowance from the poor-rates, and for the support of his wife and every other of his family Is. 6d. When the gallon loaf shall cost Is. 6d., then every poor and industrious man shall have 4s, weekly for his own support, and Is. lOd. for the support of every other of his family. And so in proportion as the price of bread rises or falls, (that is to say) 3d. to the man and Id. to every other of the family on every Id. which the loaf rises above Is." The example was rapidly accepted; and, in the fol- lowing year, it was partly endorsed by an extension of Gilbert's Act enabling all parishes to abolish the workhouse test, and to give out-relief to the able-bodied. Whether this wholesale imposition of pauperism on Southern England was actuated more by mis- guided pity, by fear of riot and rick-burning, or by desire to evade the insistent demand of the labourers 40 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. i. for a minimum wage,i it may never be possible to determine. TojTibee, who thought the problem " might have been solved by common justice in the matter of enclosures," calls it " Tory Socialism." If they have any meaning, the words should imply a serious political idea. There was deliberation enough afterwards, as we shall see ; but we may be sure it was crude impulse; rather than political reasoning, that ruled the deliberations at the Peli- can Inn. Probably the magistrates could not now have enforced on employers a scale of wages, even if they had wished to do so ; and the effort would have had little support at Westminster. The emergency, however, was grave ; something must be done at once. That the " dining squires " actually depressed the wages they claimed to desire to raise, that they created poverty more than any Poor Law could relieve, and deepened the degradation which the revolution in agriculture and manufacture had begun, we shall presently show. But their blunders do not justify the scoffs of Burke, the neglect of Pitt, or the pseudo-scientific scorn of the laisser-faire economists. Panic, in retrospect, is always a wretched spectacle ; and it is difficult now to do justice to the Ministers who suspended Habeas Corpus in 1794 and crushed the political societies, or to the judges who sent Palmer, Muir, and other obscure idealists to Botany ' There Is a particularly interesting manifesto by labourers of Heacham and two other Norfolk parishes demanding a Wage scale based upon prices. The attempt to organize a movement of this character broke upon the anti-combination laws. ( § vii.] THE GREAT DISRUPTION 41 Bay. To how small a class these fears were limited was shown by their one great failure, the abortive prosecution of Holcroft, Hardy, and Home Tooke. Government should be, above all, the art of social adjustment. Much as may be allowed for the anx- ieties of the external crisis on which the nineteenth century dawned, it must be said that, even in the direst emergency, external defence is but one-half of the duty of statesmanship, and that, in a just view, neglect of defence would be no more unpardon- able than neglect of domestic welfare by those who hold the seats of power. CHAPTER II FROM THE FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO, 1801-1820 I. The People are Numbered For once, the opening of a century marks a real point in the development of a people, for it was in 1801 that the first British Census was taken. In ancient times, social unity was of a quite different kind, and was attained by quite different means, from those of the modern world. It implied efficient control of obedient masses of subjects by a governing class small enough for all its parts to be familiarly acquainted ; when this personal inti- macy broke down, the State itself was in danger of breaking down. In the Middle Ages, the bond of society was found in local landownership, and its mutual obligations. Everybody knew every- body else in the village ; the King was far away, only a greater landowner ; the Holy Empire was a splendid myth, a ritual, an ideal, momentarily made fact by some rare superman. The greater dimen- sions, complexity, and vigour of modern life have called into being, where geographical and historical circumstances are favourable, a new form of social union, the nation — a body of people so large that § I.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 43 personal acquaintance even between all the impor- tant persons is impossible, and objective knowledge must be called in as an agent of conunon feeling. The workman no longer sees his master ; the spinner does not know the weaver ; the housewife may not even know when the grain is sown and garnered. The manufacturer can no longer count his own goods, there must be a more or less elabo- rate " book-keeping " ; the pack-horse has gone to grass ; the merchant does not cross the ocean, but depends on the reports of travellers and foreign agents. The Minister must take the word of his assistants, who must take the word of the county officers, who, in turn, must take the word of the justices and overseers of the parish. The Bishop has ceased to be a missionary ; he is an adminis- trator, the head of a hierarchy. Culture no longer depends upon the aggregation of students in a imiversity, but is every man's heritage in a printed book. Government, trade, education, all necessary to the growth of national life, must all now depend upon impersonal agencies ; and the basis of this impersonal relationship is exhibited in the Census. It is the tacit acknowledgment that every human being counts, that there is this much of divine in human government — ^that it cannot allow the mean- est being bom to appear or disappear without the tribute of a modest record. The men who first make it do not realize all its significance ; they are chiefly troubled by this idea of Mr Malthus that there are too many people for decency, or 44 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. by the rival idea that there are too few people to cope with Napoleon. It would, indeed, be a poor invention all whose uses appeared at first sight. Scoffers say that statistics reduce a man to a cypher ; let it be admitted that there is unavoid- able loss in the effort to comprehend a complex group of facts by means of an outline expressing an average. There is infinite possibility of their misuse ; on the other hand, statistics, truly seen, give man a new value, for, here at least, all are fellows, and all are equal. Implicit in this bureaucratic invention of the Census was the very unbureaucratic idea, slowly and painfully to be realized, that every child born on British soil has a claim upon the nation, and must in turn take, in proportion to his ability, a share of that burden, with all the rights attaching to it. It is idle to lament the passing of the city-republic and the village-community. They have passed ; and the essential thing is to procure a corresponding ex- tension of the purview of the State and the mental horizon of the citizen. Personal acquaintance within a small radius continues, too often in the form of prejudice, and is yet influential ; casual observation is encouraged to cocksureness by the example of the newspaper. At such a juncture, a spectacled gentleman in an obscure office may perform an invaluable function. What is unique in Smith, Brown, and Robinson is nothing to him ; but he shows us what is common to them. For all that is beyond individuality, that is, for all the routine § I.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 45 of social life, he supplies a test of regularity and accuracy, a means to justice. Many years had to pass ere the problems of Government could be strictly measurable ; but a beginning was made. And as the art of counting progressed, every branch of science re- ceived a stimulus.! Political economy was re-born ; the science of public health was created ; in future, history must be written with not a few respectable protagonists only, but the whole people, in view. All honour being given to John Rickman, assis- tant-clerk of the House of Commons, who managed the first three Censuses, it must be said that only a very imperfect beginning was made in 1801. Ire- land, although just united to Great Britain, was not included till 1821. The enumeration was carried out in Scotland by the parish schoolmasters, in England by the parish overseers ; the prodigality of the poor relief in this unhappy period alone gave the figures the rough accuracy they possess. A feeble attempt to count occupations yielded results of little value ; it was not till 1831 that employments were recorded on a considerable scale, and even then the classifications were very imperfect. In 1821, a record of ages was taken for the whole kingdom ; in 1841 figures of marriages 1 A. L. Bowley, Elementary Statistics : " The whole doctrine of evolution and heredity rests in reality on a statistical basis." The Statistical Department of the Board of Trade was founded in 1832, the Manchester Statistical Society in 1833, the Royal Statistical Society in 1834, and the Registrar-General's Office in 1836. But it is significant that in 1901, in publishing Ma Elements, Mr Bowley had to observe : " There seems to be no text-book in English dealing directly and completely with the common method of statistics." 46 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. and deaths were also available, and a firm basis for future calculations was laid by the working of the registration machinery. The population of Great Britain in 1801 was 10,942,000. Ireland would give rather more than five millions, making about sixteen millions for the United Kingdom. By way of comparison, it may be said that the population of France (within its old frontiers) was then about 26| miUions, and that of the United States (free whites only) about 6^ millions. The British people were in- creasing at a very rapid rate ^ ; that much is certain, though exactly how rapid a rate, or how constituted — whether chiefly by rise of births, or by fall of deaths, or by immigration — cannot be accurately determined. There are reasons for thinking that, while there must have been a slight fall of the death-rate, due to glimmerings of education and sanitation, more varied food, and better clothes, at the end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth centuries, there was probably a rise, more marked than the contemporary estimates show, in the birth-rate, due to the destruction of the old static life, the demoralizing effect of the poor-law, and the temptations of child employment. The redistribution is even more remarkable than the increase of population. London continued to hold her own pre-eminence in the national life ; otherwise, there was nothing to compare with the rise of the industrial districts of the North. • Seo Appendix I. § I.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 47 In 1820, Lancashire had a milhon people, and the West Riding of Yorkshire over three-quarters of a million. Glasgow, Edinburgh, Manchester, and Liverpool exceeded 130,000, and Birmingham 100,000. Bristol, Leeds, Sheffield, Wolverhampton, Newcastle, Nottingham, and Bradford followed. It will be noticed that, in this list of thirteen cities, there are five great ports, three of which faced, not the old Continent, but Ireland and the New World. Ireland occupied the most lamentable place in the family picture. For centuries subjected to every variety of oppression, her agriculture drained to feed absentee landlords, her industries delibe- rately crippled to appease British jealousy, the Parliamentary independence conceded in alarm in 1782 had now been withdrawn, by a procedure shockingly compounded of corruption and naked force. The break-up of the clannish organization in the Highlands after the '45 had involved misery, though on no such scale ; but, while Scotland and England suffered from the impersonal forces of social evolution, and in due time reaped large reward from the change, Ireland was the victim of sheer human hatred and tyranny. The results are marked deeply upon the history of the United Kingdom throughout the century. In 1821 the population of Ireland was 6,801,800 (more than half as large as that of England and Wales, and over three times as large as that of Scotland). For twenty years after the Union, she paid for her own costs of gbvemment and debt (the latter rose from 48 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. 2 1 millions in 1793 to 113 millions in 1817), and two-fifths of the general expenses of the United Kingdom. Between two dreadful famines in 1817 and 1847 — on the latter occasion, a million people died of starvation — ^there were many lean years. Nevertheless, the population increased up to the time of the Potato Famine. The Census of 1851 first showed a decline ; and this has continued steadily to the present day. The depopulation of Ireland, its constant poverty and intermittent rebelliousness, its melancholy share in a stream of emigration which carried overseas eleven million souls in sixty years, enriching American life while it was filling English slums, — all this constitutes a tragic factor in our subject to which no sort of justice can be done here, but which must by no means be overlooked. II. In the Shadow of War There is one occupation of the British people during the first fifteen years of the century which must take precedence of others in our consideration, not that it engaged the largest number of any, but because it and its results governed and over- shadowed all other natural activities. At the opening of the great war, in 1793, the army and navy counted together scarcely a hundred thousand men ; before its close, England was maintaining nearly a million men under arms, probably a fifth of the entire adult male population, and was carry- ing a burden of expenditure and debt for which § II.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 49 previous history could afford no parallel. We strike into the story of this titanic struggle at the lucid interval when the Peace of Amiens was negotiated, when the festival of the guillotine was a fading memory, and it seemed possible that First Consul Bonaparte might rest content with the laurels of Marengo. People prayed it might be, prayed with all the piety of exhaustion. The English are slow pupils, astonishingly loyal to incompetent masters. The Corresponding Societies' Act of 1800, the last of a series of repressive measures, had completed the suspension of all constitutional guarantees of personal liberty ; and this was not the most in- credible of the things the people had undergone at the hands of William Pitt and his sovereign. When these two fell out over Catholic Emancipation, the half-mad King obstinately refusing to fulfil the pledge of honour to the Irish by which the Union had been obtained, Addington, an admitted second-rater, was dumbly accepted. Nobody cared about the Union, except those who had been paid to vote it ; and nobody could pretend to care much for the honour of a Ministry and a Parliament built upon corruption and privilege, and now exercising a quite arbitrary power. The cession of all the conquests of the war (except Trinidad and Ceylon) went for nothing : " The Cape of Good Hope ! " — we may imagine one of the Spital- fields weavers exclaiming — " a pretty name, but give me a loaf of bread ! " Napoleon had not yet D 50 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. become the grand obsession of Europe. Nelson's exploits at Aboukir Bay and Copenhagen had wiped out the unhappy memory of the Nore and Spithead mutinies ; and the raft-lumber at Boul- ogne, while it kept a good many fussy persons occupied on the South Coast, could not produce a real national alarm. There is an anaemic sort of common sense in such a time ; but we must not look for active political intelligence. Hunger kills the political spirit, and even pales the light of patriotism. The best we can say is that, despe- rately desiring peace, London would not gag the scribblers and caricaturists who provoked the Dictator of Paris to such strange tantrums. Pitt, in his retirement, observed complacently that Jacobinism in England was checked. No one had a better right to flatter himself on this result than the man who had five times raised the taxes on spirits and tea, who had taxed glass till the windows were built up, who had taxed sugar and salt, timber, bricks, tiles, stone, and slate, hats and hair-powder, sea-insurance and convoys, horses and dogs, parcels by coach and canal, clocks and watches, newspapers and advertisements, houses and the servants in them, and who had failed only in his efforts to tax gloves and mittens, the regis- tration of births and marriages, and the modest handmaiden of the middle-class. Never have the possibilities of tax-gathering been so luridly illus- trated. " The school-boy whips his taxed top " — but we need not complete the hackneyed quotation § n] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 51 of Sydney Smith's satire. The only merit of this finance was that it hit everybody ; and Pitt's progressive income-tax covers a multitude^of sins. Only a measure of equality in sacrifice was wanting. The Earl of Warwick told his fellow Peers that farmei'S were making 200 per cent, profit, that some of them " could afford to play guinea whist, and were not contented with drinking wine only, but even mixed brandy with it." This sounds spiteful. It is certain, however, that the masses of the people had endured to the last point. In January 1801, after two bad harvests, wheat was at 187s. a quarter, and the use of unmixed wheat flour was forbidden. In March, it reached 153s. In course of debates at Westminster which often bordered upon the silly, and even the frivolous, Pitt argued that " war of itself had no evident or necessary connection with the dearness of provisions " ; to which Sheridan replied that the 800,000 men in the army and navy were consuming four or five times as much as so many men in time of peace, and that, if war were not the cause of high prices, then the outlook was, indeed, deplorable. After the proclamation of the preliminaiies of peace, in fact, the price of wheat fell till it reached 68s. in December. Could there be better reason for fire-works in Cheapside, triangles of tallow candles in the windows of Fleet Street, and illumi- nated pictures of Napoleon and George III in Pall Mall ? There had been food riots of a half- heai>ted kind in Birmingham, Nottingham, Coventry, 52 MODERN ENGLAND [chai-. it. Norwich, Sheffield, and Worcester— towns where machinery was taking away more work than it gave. Whether from ancient prejudice, or by design of men who knew better, these disturbances were nearly always directed against " forestallers and regrators " — exponents of the art, once a crime, now a virtue,! of buying cheap and selling dear. Gangs of roughs had broken windows in Mark Lane and the Borough, and had been easily dispersed (there being still no nearer approach to a Metro- politan Police than the watchmen and the Bow Street runners) by parties of Volunteers. Is there a moderation even in British hooligan- ism ? Or were the hungry cowed by thought of the frightful punishments which then took the place of a good police and a just bench ? In no other country, according to that chivalric and far- sighted lawyer. Sir Samuel Romilly, were there so many capital offences ; they numbered over two hundred varieties, including cutting down young trees, shooting rabbits, sheap-stealing, damaging Westminster Bridge, appearing disguised on a public road, and stealing property valued at five shillings. Only, perhaps, a quarter of such sentences were carried out ; but intimidation was openly held to be the best way of preventing crime, and the bench of Bishops was agreed in " It is, of course, plain that whatever tends to the husbanding of resources and to the equalization of prices is really advantageous, and that the corn factors, in carrying out the law of supply and demand, were a most useful set of men " (Bright's History of England, iii. 1229). § II.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 53 rejecting the answer that a mild but certain punish- ment would be more effective. ^ Between 1805 and 1818, there were more than two hundred executions for forgery alone. ^ Of the horrors of transporta- tion and of incarceration in gaols which were rightly called universities of crime, of the prevalence of duelling and brutal sports, it is not necessary to speak here. The reminder will suffice that we are considering a time when violence and dishon- esty were common not only in the lowest, but in all levels of society. At the bottom, they were the fruits of poverty and ignorance ; and there is evidence that they increased rapidly during the war, and slowly for some time afterward. After a year and a half of retrenchment and resumed trade with France, Addington replied to Napoleon's quarrelsome messages with a declara- tion of war, in May 1803 ; and there was no more peace till Waterloo. The income-tax was reim- posed at 5 per cent., with exemption up to £60, and abatement to £150. Large bodies of Volunteers were formed ; and Robert Emmet's boyish attempt at " insurrection " in Dublin divided with the Boulogne camp the attention of the scaremon- gers. In May 1804, Napoleon declared himself Emperor, and Pitt was recalled to office. A fifth addition was made to the wine duties ; the port duties were increased by 12j per cent. On May 24th, William Cobbett was tried, found guilty of 1 Smart : Economic Annals, 1801-20, pp. 227-31. * Melville Lee : History of Police in England, p. 201. 54 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. libelling members of the Irish Government, and fined £500. In June, the abolition of the slave-trade was voted by the Commons, but negatived in the Upper House. Pitt's last budget, in 1805, raised the income-tax to 6| per cent., added 2| per cent, to the port duties, and put new burdens on bricks, glass, coffee, cider, vinegar, and salt. In the autunm, Napoleon abandoned the Channel project ; and on October 21st the victory of Trafalgar, at the cost of Nelson's life, finally secured the safety of England. Six weeks later, Austerlitz gave Napoleon a supremacy on land equal to that of his stoutest enemy at sea. Pitt died, broken-hearted over the collapse of his Third Coalition, on January 23rd, 1806, only forty-seven years of age. The Grenville-Fox " Broad-bottomed " Ministry brought the income-tax up to 10 per cent., exemp- tions being now allowed only on earned incomes. All teas were taxed to 96 per cent, of the price; and port duties were raised for the fifth time, by 8| per cent. On the other hand, the free importation of Irish grain was at last allowed. In September, Fox died ; and a period of parliamentary mediocrities began. After completing the humiliation of Prussia at Jena, Napoleon proceeded to issue the " Berlin decrees " forbidding trade with England, and forfeiting all British property on the Continent. The year 1807 opened with the British reply — the " Orders in Council " forbidding trade with France and her conquered lands, and further restricting the rights of neutral powers. Napoleon's § n.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 55 action provoked smuggling everywhere, to the advantage of England, which had a practical monopoly of sea traffic, and stimulated patriotic resistance, especially in Spain and Germany. The Orders in Council gradually led to war with the United States, and confirmed the aggressive policy of Great Britain with regard to private property in naval war, which is maintained with modifica- tions to this day. The effect of the double blockade of Europe upon British commerce was less marked than might have been expected. The declared value of exports had risen from 36 millions in 1800 to nearly 40 millions in 1807 ; it fell to 36-3 millions in 1809. Imports also fell by about 2 millions. On March 25th, 1807, the gallant efforts of Wil- berforce, Clarkson, and Zachary Macaulay were rewarded by the vote abolishing the slave trade. No ship was to clear from any port in the British dominions with slaves on board after May 1st, and no slave was to be landed in the Colonies after March 1808. It is the one clearly glorious mark upon an unhappy and inglorious time, and shines the more for the blackness of the surrounding distresses. The spirit of the nation had sunk so low that the King was allowed to dismiss the Ministry in order to prevent a measure of justice being done to Irish Catholic officers in the army. Soon afterwards, George became permanently in- sane. Lancashire was suffering bitterly, with 60,000 looms idle, and the mobs were out in Rochdale 56 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. and Manchester. The small possibilities of new revenue were now effected chiefly by " consoli- dation " of existing taxes. Attempts to bring the iron and cotton trades under tribute failed before an unexpected resistance. In 1808 began the six years' war in aid of the independence of Spain and Portugal, a continual drain of life to be added to the continual drain of money. The ballot filled the ranks of the militia, and bounties, rising as high as £60, procured a plentiful enlistment thence into the regular army ; while the navy was supplied by the press-gang, the terror of every port. The officership of the army was wholly determined by purchase or parlia- mentary patronage. Wellington himself was no exception to the rule ; "he was enabled to move up from ensign on March 7th, 1787, to lieutenant- colonel in September 1793, five steps in seven years, during which he had been moved through as many regiments — ^two of horse and five of foot. He was only nineteen months a captain, and six months a major ; and he had seen no war service whatever when he sailed for Flanders in command of the 23rd at the age of 23. . . . Contrast with such promotion that of the poor and friend- less officer who, after 25 years of service, six Peninsular campaigns, and two wounds, found himself still a captain at the age of 43." i In an examination of the courts - martial of the war. Professor Oman finds that the two ' C. W. C. Oman : Wellington's Army, pp. 199. § 11.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 57 commonest offences were desertion and plundering of the peasantry. There were very few charges of cowardice. Whether the savagery of the rank and file made the lash necessary, or the lash made savages of men upon whom wrong after wrong had been perpetrated, has often been discussed. Probably there is an element of truth on either side. Virtues and vices are strangely distributed. Napoleon was remorseless in theft and extor- tion ; but the British use of the whip was regarded in the French army as an atrocious and incom- prehensible thing. It was apparently so well understood in England that a country editor who contrasted the British and the French practice was sent to prison for eighteen months. A respectable Guardsman at the age of sixty, on being trans- ferred into the battalion at the Tower, received 300 lashes for being absent for a day. In July 1809, there was a mutiny among the militia at Ely. German cavalry were brought in to sup- press them ; and the ringleaders were sentenced to 500 lashes each. Wm. Cobbett, for denouncing this barbarity, was sent to Newgate for two years, and fined a thousand pounds. Sentences of 500 lashes were common ; and, in 1811, there was a sentence of a thousand lashes, of which 750 were actually inflicted. Palmerston, as Secretary at War, resisted a proposal to hmit the number to a hundred ; and the motion was rejected without a division. Crime and poverty were, in fact, as typical a 58 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. manufacture in the England of a century ago as iron and cotton. Undoubtedly, the Peninsular army contained many criminals ; and of the Irish who composed a fourth or a fifth of every corps many were drunken and quarrelsome. " It was this scum," says Professor Oman, " a small pro- portion of the whole, but always swimming to the top when there was mischief to be done — ^peasants to be plundered, or churches to be pillaged — ^that provided the subject-matter for courts-martial. Officers of undoubted humanity, and men in the ranks who knew what they were talking about, unite in stating that there was a residuum in the Peninsular Army which could only be governed by the lash. This small percentage of irreconcil- ables provided the nucleus around which misconduct sometimes grew to a great scale in moments of special privation or temptation. In abominable orgies like the sack of Badajoz, or the lesser but still disgraceful riots of Ciudad Rodrigo and San Sebastian, it was the criminals who started the game, but the drunkards — a far more numerous class — ^who took it up." ^ Sir John Moore's retreat to Coruna and the disastrous expedition to Walcheren in 1809 repre- sent the lowest ebb of British military power. But Wellington was now teaching his rowdies the art of standing firm, in which they were to triumph at Hougoumont ; while Napoleon was embroiling himself in the fatal adventure that ended in the ^ C. W. C. Oman: WelUngton's Army, pp. 212-13. § II.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 59 retreat from Moscow and the dibdcle of Leipzic. We may note in passing that a Bill was passed in 1812 for the relief of insolvent debtors, and that, during the next thirteen years, no less than fifty thousand of these unfortunates were released from prison. In the following year, British India, the extent of which had been greatly enlarged by Wellesley's conquests, was thrown open to all traders. These are the years of the Luddite riots, of bad crops and famine prices, of collapse in foreign trade, and heavy depreciation of the currency. The machine-breaking mania recurred among the distressed Nottingham hosiery weavers in November 1811, and spread rapidly. Unlike the Captain Boycott of later fame, the Captain Ludd who was supposed to organize the outrages appears to have been a mythical personage. Nineteen hundred soldiers were brought into Nottingham ; but the disturbances continued for two years here and in the neighbouring counties, and were renewed in 1816. It was fitly given to Lord Byron, in a singularly fine maiden speech in the Upper House, on the Coercion Act of January 1812 (the year of Childe Harold), to anticipate the judgment of history on these events. " To enter into details of the riots," he said, " would be superfluous. The House is already aware that every outrage short of actual bloodshed has been perpetrated. During the short time I recently passed in Nottinghajnshke, not twelve hours elapsed without some fresh act 60 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. of violence. But, while these outrages must be admitted to exist to an alarming extent, it cannot be denied that they have arisen from circumstances of the most unparalleled distress. When we are told that these men are leagued together for the destruction not only of their own comfort, but of their very means of existence, can we forget that it is the bitter policy, the destructive warfare, of the last eighteen years which has destroyed their comfort, your comfort, all men's comfort, that policy which, originating with ' great statesmen now no more,' has survived the dead, to become a curse on the living unto the third and fourth genera- tion ? ... At present the country suffers from the double infliction of a useless military and a starving population. You call these men a mob, desperate, dangerous, and ignorant, and seem to think the only way to quiet it is to lop off a few of its superfluous heads. But even a mob may be better reduced to reason by a mixture of con- ciliation and firmness than by additional irritation and redoubled penalties. Are you aware of our obligations to a mob ? It is the mob which labour in your fields and serve in your houses, that man your navy and recruit your army, that have enabled you to defy all the world, and can also defy you when neglect and calamity have driven them to despair. . . . Never under the most despotic of infidel governments did I behold such squalid wretchedness as I have seen since my return in the very heart of a Christian country. How will § n.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 61 you carry this Bill into effect ? Can you commit a whole country to their own prisons ? . . . But suppose one of these men, as I have seen them, meagre with famine, sullen with despair, careless of a life which your lordships value at something less than the price of a stocking-frame, suppose this man, torn from the children for whom he is unable to procure bread, dragged into court, to be tried for this new offence by this new law, still there are two things wanting to convict and con- demn him, and these are, in my opinion, twelve butchers for a jury, and a Jeffreys for a judge." Never, perhaps, before or since, has the voice of the commonalty been echoed with such un- mitigated daring in the sanctum of privilege* The general economic crisis was reflected in a fall in imports, in 1811, of nearly 13 millions, and in exports of a rather larger sum. The depreciation of the currency had been an aggravation of every other burden since the suspension of cash payments by the Bank of England in 1797. In 1801 the average value per cent, was £91, 12s. 4d. ; in 1803, £97, 6s. lOd. ; in 1810 it was down to £86, 10s. 6d. ; in 1812, to £79, 5s. 3d. ; and in 1814 the lowest point was reached, a hundred pounds nominal being worth only £74, 17s. 6d., a depreciation of more than a quarter. Under the Resumption Act of 1819, the Bank recommenced giving coin for notes in May 1821, and the depreciation disappeared. On April 3rd, 1814, the Emperor abdicated ; and there was nearly a year's truce. Dui'ing this 62 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. interval, the Treaty of Ghent closed the discredit- able war with the United States, and closed it to such good purpose that, for a century, peace has continued between these cousin-nations, and the safety of three thousand miles of unguarded Canadian frontier has shown the possibility of disarmament. During the last years of the French war, with expenditure at £6 per head of population, no great volume of new revenue could be obtained ; save for fresh taxes on leather, glass, and tobacco in 1812, and a sixth general increase of the port duties by 25 per cent, in the following year, there was nothing for it but to borrow, and borrow again. In 1815, imposts were placed on various classes of excise traders, on brewers and soap-makers, on gold and silver plate, newspapers (the tax was now 4d. a copy), bills, and deeds. In June, the news of Waterloo raised hopes soon to be damped; and it became possible to close the accoimts of the war, and to reflect upon them. The first item of such an account should be the toll of lives lost or maimed ; but no trustworthy estimate exists under this head. Unlike human bodies and souls, golden sovereigns are made to be counted. In 1792, the national debt of Great Britain was 237 millions ; in 1815, the debt of the United Kingdom was 860 millions. " The Great War proved more costly to us than all our preceding wars taken together. The cost of the war of the Spanish Succession had been 50 millions, and that of the war of the Right of Search, 43. § II.] riRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 63 The Seven Years' War cost us 82, and the war of American Independence, 97. The cost of those wars, taken together, was, therefore, 272 millions. But the Great War cost us 831 millions." i Of this sum, 68 millions had gone in subsidies and gifts to foreign powers. Of the total cost, 622 millions were added to the national debt, and 209 millions paid out of current resources. The figures for 1815 will serve to show how the latter sum had been raised. In this year, the revenue from taxes amounted to 74| millions (32 millions being required for interest on the debt). Of this, ej millions were Ireland's contribution ; 25| mil- lions came from direct taxation in Great Britain (including 14^ millions of income-tax, and 6| millions from houses, servants, carriages, etc.), and 38 millions from indirect taxation in Great Britain (including 27 millions from food and drink, 6 millions from raw materials and coal, and 4 millions from manufactures). Even upon the face of these figures, it is evident that the bmrden fell chiefly upon the people, and only secondarily on wealth. But they are very far from representing the fulness of this result. The rich, without complaint, contributed largely, because they recouped themselves largely from that part of the indirect taxation which was of a " protective " character. Thus, the expressed intention of the Corn Law of 1815 was to raise a natural price of 61s. (the January average) to at I Stephen Dowell : History of Taxation, ii. 209. 64 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. least 80s. by prohibiting cheaper imports. Assum- ing these rates to be steady for a year, supposing the consumption of wheat to be 9,000,000 quarters (there is no exact estimate), and deducting one- third of this as being consumed by the agricul- tural population as food and for seed, we find the cost of " protection " on this article alone to the remainder of the nation to amount to no less than £57 millions. Arbitrary as such calculations neces- sarily are, because prices constantly fluctuate, and consumption varies with them, they are useful to indicate the radical difference between taxation proper, the whole product of which goes into the Exchequer, and protective or prohibitory duties, the chief or sole result of which is to make the many consumers pay higher prices for home sup- plies for the benefit of a relatively small class of producers. How came legislation of the kind to be placed and to be kept so long upon the statute-book ? To understand this and other important circum- stances of the time, we must look more closely into the position of agriculture and the classes dependent on it. III. Agriculture under the Corn Laws The three Censuses gave 35 "2 per cent, of the families of Great Britain as occupied in agriculture in 1811, 33-2 per cent, in 1821, and 28-2 per cent, in 1831. The positive increase of the agricultural class in twenty years was stated as 7-2, and of the § m.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 65 trading and manufacturing classes 27 per cent. Ireland was almost wholly, Wales was mainly, dependent on agriculture ; Scotland drew large profit from her fisheries. The estimates of national capital and income at this period are vague and uncertain.! But they concur with the other figures in marking the trend from a preponderance of rural to a preponderance of urban life, labour, and wealth. Agriculture, indeed, was doubly stimulated during the period we are dealing with. There was a genuine spirit of scientific improve- ment afoot. The King, who liked to be called " Farmer George," patronized the movement ; and the Board of Agriculture organized and ad- • In a series of estimates of English wealth from 1690 to 1800, Sir Robert GifEen arrived at a total property value in the latter year of £1500 millions ; and he thought the proportion of laud to the whole had fallen from sixty to forty per cent. Pitt, in 1798, esti- mated the taxable incomes in Great Britain as amounting to £45 millions in rents of land, houses, etc., and £40 millions in profits of trade and commerce. In a volume of Observations on Kit's income-tax proposals, in 1800, the Eev. H. Beeke calculated the total effective private capital of Great Britain at £1420 millions (£720 millions being in land, £75 millions tithes, and £125 millions farming capital) and the income at £92J millions, of which £44 millions came from the land. In 1812, Colquhoun, in his Wealth, etc., of the British Empire, reckoned the capital of the whole Kingdom at £2736 millions, and gave £1200 millions as the value of land ; but he thought that the total income from commerce, naviga- tion, and manufactures amounted to £183 millions, that from land and mines together (Ireland included) to only £107 millions. Further particulars will be found in Chap. 38 of Mr F. W. Hirst's edition of Porter's Progress of the Nation. This edition summarizes the original work — which must still be consulted by the historical student — but b very useful in bringing the statistical record down to the end of the century. 66 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. vertised it. The Board, founded in 1793, was not a Government department, but another character- istic English compromise, a sort of subsidized, quasi-official corporation. Sir John Sinclair, as its president, and Arthur Young, as its secretary, worked indefatigably to popularize better crops and a better rotation, better cattle-breeding, better implements, drainage, and organization, and the bringing into use of lands hitherto waste. Coke of Holkham, Jethro Tull, Lord Townshend, and other pioneers were held up as examples which every patriotic landlord and farmer ought to follow. Davy was induced to lecture in London from 1803 to 1813 on vegetable chemistry ; and it was at the instance of the Board that Erasmus Darwin wrote his Phytologia, or the Philosophy of Agriculture and Gardening, published in 1799, three years before his death. Darwin was a friend of Watt, Boulton, and Wedgwood ; and there were other links between the spheres of mechanical invention and rural enterprise. The threshing-machine, projected in 1758, was now in common use ; and Cartwright had installed a steam-engine for the Duke of Bedford at a cost of £700. Reaping-, mowing-, and winnowing-machines, chaff-cutters, and other implements were brought into use. Farmers' clubs and cattle-shows multiplied. The drainage of the fens of Cambridgeshire and Lincohi- shire was taken up in earnest. The Eastern counties and the Lowlands of Scotland were the most active centres of experimental cultivation; §ni.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 67 but the whole country felt the current of new life. Enlightenment in the landlord and ingenuity in the mechanician and organizer are not, however, prime factors in producing such a change as this in the most conservative part of society. Agri- cultural produce cannot be multiplied magically, like cotton cloth when steam is harnessed to the loom. It was the increase of non-agricultural population, the cutting-oft of foreign food supplies, and the consequent high prices, that awoke these imwonted energies in the farming class. England had definitely become a wheat-importing country in 1773, and had ceased to export twenty years later. During that period, the price of com did not average more than 46s., though bad seasons and interference with maritime trade led to acute fluctuations. The enclosing of less fertile lands was one of a number of influences which produced, at this time, a strong access of protectionist senti- ment. By the Act of 1791, repealing previous Corn Laws, a balance of export bounty and import duty was arranged with the purpose of keeping the price at about 54s. ; actually, from 1790 to 1799 it averaged 55s. lid. Thanks to the fact that Napoleon's economic ideas were of that peculiarly crude kind of Protectionism which sees wealth only in exports, no effort was made to cut off during the war France's food supplies to England ; it was one of the costliest blunders of the great conqueror's career. But the indirect 68 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. obstruction of commerce was sufficient, with de- ficient harvests from 1798 to 1801, to run prices up to an unprecedented figure in the latter year. The rapid fall that followed led to an outcry; and in 1804 foreign imports were practically prohibited till 63s. a quarter was quoted. In 1810-11, when the crops of Prussia, Poland, and Russia were absorbed by the hosts engaged for and against the Moscow expedition, and in 1812, during the war with the United States, the highest recorded level was reached ; the coimtry was, in fact, on the brink of famine. Again prices tumbled down ; and again, when the wars were ended, was heard the bitter cry of farmers who had been induced to sink cash and credit in wheat-growing, and now found themselves faced with American and Baltic competition. The first result was the Corn Law of 1815, prohibiting import (except of the trifling Canadian supplies) till wheat stood at 80s.,^ rye, peas, and beans at 53s., barley at 40s., and oats at 26s. Every increase of the corn duties had been 1 The fluctuations in the price of averages, may be thus shown : It s. d. Fell from 54 3 in 1783. to 40 , 1786. Rose „ 54 9 , 1790. Fell „ 43 , 1792. Eose „ 98 7 , 1796. Fell „ 51 10 , 1798. Bose „ 119 6 , 1801. Fell „ 58 10 , 1803. wheat, smoothed into annual s. d. Rose „ 89 9 „ 1805. Fell „ 75 4 „ 1807. Rose „ 106 5 „ 1810, and „ 126 6 „ 1812. Fell „ 66 7 „ 1815. Rose „ 78 6 „ 1816, and „ 96 11 „ 1817. FeU „ 67 10 „ 1820. §m.] I'IRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 69 marked by an extension of the area of tillage. In 1803, Sinclair " declared war," as he put it, on waste land ; it was not, he said, enough to liberate Egypt and subdue Malta, they must attack Finch- ley Common and conquer Hounslow Heath. The campaign against the few remaining commoners was an easy success. From 1760 to 1769, the number of Enclosure Bills was 385 ; in the next decade it was 660 ; in the 'eighties 246 ; in the 'nineties 469 ; from 1800 to 1809 it was 847 ; and in the following ten years, 858, there being 133 in the year 1812 alone. In the first twenty years of the nineteenth century, over three million acres of land were so appropriated for cultivation. This is the maximum of the enclosure movement. Although more improvable lands remained, with the existing communications they could not be profitably exploited. Many of the new farms, indeed, could only be profitably worked so long as artificial prices prevailed ; but there is ground for thinking that the average fertility of soil had been somewhat improved. The rise of rents is significant. It is thought to have amounted to 100 per cent., or even 150 per cent., in the twenty years before Waterloo. The rental of the Holkham estate rose from £2200 in 1776 to £20,000 in 1816 ; but this, of course, was a peculiar case. " With scarcely any exception," said Porter, writing in 1836, " tte revenue drawn in tie form of rent from the ownership of the soil has been at least doubled in every part of Great Britain since 1790. In the county of Essex, 70 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. farms could be pointed out which were let just before the war of the French Revolution at less than 10s. per acre, and which rose rapidly duriag the progress of that con- test, until, in 1812, the rent paid for them was from 458. to 50s. per acre. This advance has not, it is true, been maintained since the return of peace : in 1818 the rent was reduced to 35s., and at the present time is only 20s. per acre, which, however, is still more than double that which was paid in 1790. In Berkshire and Wiltshire there are farms which ia 1790 were let at 14s. per acre, and which in 1810 produced to the landlord a rent of 70s., being a fivefold advance. These farms were let in 1820 at 50s., and at this time pay 30s. per acre, being 114 per cent, advance upon the rent paid ia 1790. In StafEordshire there are several farms on one estate which were let in 1790 at 8s. per acre, and which, having in. the dearest time advanced to 35s., have siace been lowered to 20s., an advance, after all, of 150 per cent, within the half century. The rents here mentioned, as being those for which the farms are now let, are not nominal rates from which abatements are periodi- cally made by the landlord, but are regularly paid, not- withstanding the depressed prices at which some kinds of agricultural produce have of late been sold. In Norfolk, Sufiolk, and Warwickshire, the same, or nearly the same, rise has been experienced ; and it is more than probable that it has been general throughout the kingdom. During the same period the prices of most of the articles which con- stitute the landlord's expenditure have fallen mateiiaDy; and if his condition be not improved in a corresponding degree, that circumstance must arise from improvidence or miscalculation, or habits of expensive living beyond what would be warranted by the doubling of income which he has experienced and is still enjoying." Three great influences were at work modifying § m.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 71 the constitution of rural society — ^the war and war prices, enclosure, and the growth of manu- factures. Unfortunately, means are lacking for an exact estimate of their effect. England was becoming a country of large estates ; but before Waterloo there were yet many commoners and yeomen. Even in 1831, when Census figures were available, of 236,343 male occupiers of land, about two-fifths employed no labourers, while the re- mainder employed an average of only 5| labourers per farmer. In Scotland, at the same time, of about eighty thousand occupiers, more than two- thirds employed no labourers ; and in Ireland more than three-quarters of those engaged on the land were poor cottiers.' British agriculture pre- sented a marked contrast to that of France, with its three and a half million landowners, three millions of whom (with their families, two-thirds of the whole nation) farmed on the average only fourteen acres apiece. In 1831, the old race of small independent cultivators was disappearing from the countryside ; in 1815, many still remained. Some had sunk to the status of day labourers ; but the fact that the population of the agricultural counties continued to increase, and even increased more rapidly in the second than in the first decade of the century, 1 suggests that it was not only the landlords who profited by high prices and high 1 The population of Norfolk rose from 273,371 in 1801 to 292,000 in 1811 (7 per cent.), and to 344,368 in 1821 (18 per cent.). The corresponding increases in Suffolk were 11 per cent, and 15 per cent. ; Cambridgeshire, 13 per cent, and 20 per cent. ; Devon, 12 per cent. 72 MODERN ENGLAND [ohap. n. farming, although the main profits certainly went to them. But, when the inevitable crash came, it was the more disastrous because it involved a host of weaklings, and not only a limited class of substantial proprietors. Only when importation was freed, and bread, among other commodities, became comparatively cheap, were the effects of land robbery — ^for that is what enclosure had commonly been — ^fuUy manifest. If, as the great Pitt had said, the war did not make corn dear, peace should not make it cheap. Whether they believed this or no, landlords and tenants had acted as though high prices were in the natural order, and must last. Much of the new land brought into cultivation was very inferior, and was doomed to suffer the process which Ricardo crystallized in the " law of diminish- ing returns." Good pasture was ploughed up. Money was borrowed on mortgage to effect improve- ments ; the prospect shone so bright that estates were charged with annuities, jointures, and legacies. While the poor of the towns famished, the farmer forgot to grumble over his enhanced rent. The awakening was sharp. In 1814, determined opposi- tion from the towns had prevented the passage of a new Corn Law ; yet the Act of 1815 — such was the chorus of distress when sea traffic was reopened — commanded very large majorities. Lord John and 15 per cent. ; Dorset, 8 per cent, and 16 per cent. ; Essex, 11 per cent, and 15 per cent. ; Lincolnsbire, 14 per cent, and 19 per cent. ; Somerset, 12 per cent, and 17 per cent. ; Sussex, 19 per cent, and 22 per cent. ; Wilts, 5 per cent, and 15 per cent. § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 73 Russell, in one of his first speeches in Parliament, declared that land, which had been generally let on the calculation that a quarter of wheat would be worth £5, had fallen to a half of its value in the two years after the war. Farmers had to sell their crops at any price to pay their taxes. Even Malthus, who said there had never been a more disastrous year for agriculture, and Brougham, supported the demand for protection. Opinion in the towns was all against the Corn Law ; and among public men the Free Trade principle was obtaining wider acceptance. But the economic collapse that always follows a great war was on this occasion so much aggravated that the plea for exceptional treatment was irresistible. Ricardo's explanations of rent and " diminishing returns," published two years later in his Principles of Political Economy, greatly stimulated clear thinking on the whole subject. IV. The Rise of Manufacture Meanwhile, the business of manufacture was passing through a change even more remarkable than that which had overtaken agriculture. With the repeal of the magisterial power of assessing wages and of the obligation of apprenticeship, in 1814, the spirit of laisser faire and individual adventure stood triumphant upon the ruins of the ancient social order. Henceforth, the race would be for the swift, the prizes for the strong. The 74 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. era of "Heroes and Hero Worship," prelude to that of the " Struggle for Existence," was opening. The "self-made men," who were to found "the Manchester School," rose by their own force, scorning State aid or inherited advan- tage. Those who remained in the ranks admired their energy and hardihood. In the early freshness of the change, the successful were well pleased with themselves. The nouveau riche mill-owner began to claim equality in public life with the lord of many hereditary acres ; the inventor aspired to the honours of the privi- leged order which boasted such names as Chat- ham, Pitt, Burke, Fox, and Wellington. A bold idea, now first seriously mooted. " The reign of George III," said Brougham, " may, in some im- portant respects, be justly regarded as the Augustan age of modern history. The greatest statesmen, the most consummate captains, the most finished orators, the first historians, all flourished in this period." Even the comfortable reformer of the day could be thus satisfied. But a new power was rising rapidly. When Napoleon was evidently done with, men's thoughts turned to the achieve- ments of the great engineers and architects — ^Watt, Boulton, Rennie, Telford, Mylne, Jessop, Chapman, Rumford, Huddart, Brunei, Watson, Maudslay — of Crompton, Cartwi-ight, and Arkwright ; of Murdock, who first made coal gas commercially; Tennant, the Glasgow chemist and bleacher ; Ronalds of Hammersmith, who passed an electric message § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 75 through a space of eight miles; Charles, Earl Stanhope, who invented a printing-press and a stereotype process; Bramah, the inventor of the hydraulic press; Trevethick, the inventor of the first high-pressure steam-engine and the first suc- cessful railway locomotive ; Nasmyth, of the great hammer ; Miller and Symington, the first builders of a practical steam-boat, and a host of others. Near to these stood a group of brilliant scientists, some of them familiar figures at the Royal Institu- tion (founded in 1799) : Dalton, Davy, WoUaston, Faraday, William Smith, the father of English geology, Cavendish, Herschel the astronomer, and Kater, the creator of the Indian trigonometrical survey. Marvel upon marvel these men opened to the astonished eyes of their fellows, eyes not sophisti- cated, like ours, with board-schooling and journal- ism, but stretched child-like to the sudden revelation of worlds before undreamed of. What a challenge to capable brains their famed examples uttered ! " It is well known," says Porter, " that, by the consumption of one bushel of coals in the furnace of a steam-boiler, a power is produced which in a few minutes will raise 20,000 gallons of water from a depth of 350 feet, an effect which could not be produced in a shorter time than a whole day through the continuous labour of twenty men working with the common pump." Here was transmutation as miraculous as any the alchemists conceived. But it had the merit of being " well 76 MODERN ENGLAND [chat. xt. known" and common property. All ears were agog for news of still greater conquests over the powers of nature. The age of Columbus is not more wonderful than this era of domestic discovery under the alliance of science and practical skill. A generation later, when the glamour was obscured by mill smoke and dyers' pollution, and the worse smoke and pollution of greedy unbelief, our wild Carlyle must stop in his ravings to dwell upon its magic : "It now turns out that this favoured England was not only to have her Shakespeares, Bacons, Sidneys, but to have her Watts, Arkwrights, Brindleys ! We will honour greatness in all kinds. Prospero evoked the singing of Ariel : the same Prospero can send his Fire-Demons panting across all oceans, shooting with the speed of meteors on cunning highways, from end to end of kingdoms, and make Iron its missionary, preaching its evan- gel to the brute Primeval Powers, which listen and obey : neither is this small. Manchester, with its cotton-fuzz, its smoke and dust, its tumult and contentious squalor, is hideous to thee ? Think not so : a precious substance, beautiful as magic dreams, and yet no dream but a reality, lies hidden in that noisome wrappage . . . ten thousand times ten thousand spools and spindles all set spinning there — it is, perhaps, if thou knew it well, sublime as a Niagara, or more so." ^ The industry which, in the year 1911, raised 260 million tons of coal, about a sixth of it for export, • Chartism, p,82. § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 77 was, in the early days of the nineteenth century, a much swaddled infant. Up to 1820, sea-borne supplies had to bear a duty of 7s. 6d. a ton, and 4s. of this remained until 1830. An organized restric- tion of the output known 'as the " limitation of the vend " was even more effective, in the region of the Tyne, Wear, and Tees, in preventing growth ; and this early combine had the unfortunate result, characteristic of similar cartells in our own time, of benefiting foreign countries by " dumping " goods upon them at an artificially low price. " It practically resulted that the same quality of coals which, if shipped to London, were charged at 30s. 6d. per Newcastle chaldron were sold to foreigners at 18s. for that quantity, giving a prefer- ence to the foreign buyer of 40 per cent." ^ Steam- pumping had made it possible to sink deeper shafts ; but the exploitation of the pit was still very rudi- mentary. Until 1810, it was the custom to leave large pillars of coal to support the mine roof ; the substitution of wooden props effected a con- siderable saving. The year 1813 is marked by the invention of the steam boring-machine. In 1815 Sir Humphrey Davy introduced his safety -lamp ; this not only protected the miners, but enabled deeper and remoter levels to be cut. Mechanical haulage underground only began to come into use in 1820. The total quantity of coal shipped from Newcastle and Sunderland in 1801 was about two million tons ; of the land traffic there is no record. 1 Hirst's Porter, p. 220. 78 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. In 1819, the quantity of coal shipped coastwise from British ports was 4,365,000 tons. About the same time, it was estimated that over 10 million tons were distributed inland by means of canals and railways. In 1850, the total production was estimated at 56 million tons, less than seven per cent, of this being exported. In later years, export has been upon a constantly increasing scale, in considerable part to meet the needs of British ships, both as fuel and outward cargo. Probably the most degraded type of labour in the country in the dawn of the century was that of coal-mining. Far from the observation of the great cities, and often hidden away in small hovel- communities on a wild countryside, without any education, or any possibility of sane social enjoy- ment, selected for their physical strength, and mercilessly exploited, the miners oscillated between extremes of low vice and religious frenzy. The employers held a greatly privileged position — untroubled by the anxieties of elaborate machinery, uncertain markets, or financial organization, they had simply to get and sell to a steadily increasing demand. Many of them were already wealthy as landowners ; all of them could expect to amass a fortune. Yet we find hardly a trace of interest in the lives of the wretched men who slaved in their subterranean prisons for thirteen hours a day, or the women and children who crawled about this underworld, chained like beasts to their little wagons, and toiled up the long flights of § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 79 wooden stairs with loads of the " black diamond " on their backs. In Scotland, the colliers had only just emerged from legal serfdom. Through- out the North a "yearly bond" was customary. Wages often reached to double those of neighbour- ing agricultural regions ; but such a life produces a reckless and prodigal spirit. Moreover, the miners were among the worst sufferers from cheating by " truck." A thousand of them were killed yearly, and seven or eight thousand seriously injured, by colliery accidents. Forty years of experiment in factory legislation had to pass ere, by the Act of 1842, the employment of women and of boys under ten below ground was forbidden. An official witness at that time declared that " the hardest labour in the worst room in the worst conducted factory is less hard, less cruel, and less demoralising than the labour in the best coal-mine." In 1850, official inspection of the ventilation and lighting arrangements was initiated. The miner's lot is still not an easy one ; but steady progress has been made in ameliorating it since the middle of the century. It will be convenient at this point to dismiss briefly the less important mining industries of the United Kingdom. Tin and copper had been ex- tracted, especially in Cornwall, from very early times ; and the perfection of the steam-engine, first for pumping, and then for hoisting the cage and other uses, made it possible to reach immense depths (in 1830 the Treseavon mine was 1,920 feet 80 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. deep. Thus, the produce of Cornish tin increased from 2676 tons a year at the beginning of the century to 4047 tons in 1830-34. The output of white tin has since varied from four to ten thousand tons a year. A much larger quantity of tin ore is now imported ; and the average price has risen from £87 in 1880 to £143 in 1905. The produce of the copper-mines increased more rapidly, till it reached a maximum of about twenty thousand tons (£2,487,375) in 1854. Since then, it has fallen to infinitesimal proportions, while the import has grown, especially under the stimulus of demand from the electrical industries. There are no early statistics of lead-mining ; but a product of 64,000 tons in 1854 had fallen to 29,000 tons in 1907, when the import of lead, pig, and sheet ore together was over 200,000 tons, yielding goods valued at £5-7 millions. The metalliferous mine workers are much less hable to serious accident than coUiers, but much more liable to consumption and other occupational diseases. Considerable amoimts of iron-stone, oil shale, and fire-clay are quarried in the United Kingdom; and we owe a great deal to our deposits of salt. Under the heavy excise duty which continued till 1823, the production of salt averaged about ten million bushels, four-fifths of which was exported. In the twenty years fol- lowing the removal of the duties, the consumption increased fivefold ; and to-day, when every need, domestic and manufacturing, has been satisfied, there still remains a small margin for export. § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 81 We now turn to those major and fundamental departments of modern industry, the iron, steel, and derivative trades. We saw in the last chapter their modest beginning. In 1802, there wei-e still only 144 furnaces in England and Wales, and 24 in Scotland, the average production being about a thousand tons of pig-iron yeai'ly, a marked advance upon the era of wood-fuel, but a sti'ange contrast to the prodigious records of to-day. Four yeai-s later, parliamentary inquiries gave an estimated output of 250,000 tons ; and the trade was strong enough to repel Pitt's attempt to put a tax of £2 a ton on pig-iron. Porter cites a private estimate according to which the figures rose to 442,066 tons in 1828, to 581,367 tons in 1825, 702,584 tons in 1828, 1,000,000 tons in 1831, 1,500,000 tons in 1840, and, 2,000,000 tons in 1848. These totals will serve to show the rapid acceleration of the rate of progress during the first half of the century, and of the immense demand for material for the most varied kind of manu- facture, from the finest machineiy to the roughest hardwai'e. The supply was, apparently, at all times after the first years of the century, equal to the home demand ; for, after the close of the great wai", exportation increased in full proportion, rising from a tenth to a quai'ter of the output of pig and bai- iron. South Wales and South Stafford- shire were for long the most considerable centres, Scotland being a close competitor, and Shropshire and Yorkshire following far behind. Sheffield, 82 MODERN ENGLAND [chap, li, thanks to the many neighbouring water-courses, which provided power, and the abundant local coal supplies, early became prominent in the conversion of iron into steel. Most of the metal used was imported from Sweden ; and it was reckoned in 1835 that the steel furnaces of the town used a hundred thousand tons of coal a year. According to Porter, 9000 tons of steel were then made yearly, of which a sixth was exported in an unwrought form, chiefly to the United States. Much of the remainder was converted into cutlery. Birmingham, then the " toy-shop of Europe," as Burke called it, and already one of its chief small-arms factories, was, as it still is, the centre of a very various group of metal trades classed as " hardware." Babbage gives a table of Birming- ham goods to illustrate the fall of prices (varjmig from 40 to 85 per cent.) between 1812 and 1832. They include anvils and awls, candlesticks and curry-combs, chains, nails, screws, and locks of all kinds, fire-irons, spoons, and stirrups. In many of the smallware trades, a singular compromise of industry prevailed which Porter thus describes : " A building, containing a great number of rooms of various sizes, is furnished with a steam-engine, working shafts from which are placed in each apartment or workshop, which is likewise fiirnished with a lathe, benches, and such other conveniences as are suited to the various branches of manufacture for which the rooms are likely to be needed. When a workman has received an order for the supply of f IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 8§ such a quantity of goods as will occupy him a week, or a month, or any other given time for their dotnpletion, he hires one or more of these rooms, of size and with conveniences suited to his parti- cular wants, stipulating for the use of a certain amount of steam-power. He thus realizes all the advantage that would accompany the possession of a steam-engine ; and, as the buildings thus fitted up are numerous, the charges are low." Two illustrations may be given of the restrictive effect of State policy upon industry between the great war and the adoption of the Free Trade principle. The duty on gold and silver articles being remitted to foreign traders, export was encouraged, while at home plated wares took their place, and gave Sheffield a new industry. The glass manufacture afforded a more signal instance. Excessive duties brought it to a stagnant condition in the early years of the century ; and the com- plicated regulations of the excise effectively pre- vented technical improvement. Between 1801 and 1833, the population of the country increased by one-half, the amount of glass used by only one- eighth. Indeed, the quantity seems to have decidedly declined by comiparison with the years immediately preceding the French wars. This lamentable fact, so eloquent of the poverty of the time, was undoubtedly due to the tariff, which was increased in 1794 by one-half, doubled in 1812, somewhat lowered for plate glass in 1819, and finally removed only in 1845 by Peel, who truly 84 MODERN ENGLAND [cmAP. n. said that " no tax could combine more objections, or be more at variance with all sound principles of taxation." One result of its operation had been that British scientists were for long depen- dent, for instance for optical instrument glasses, on foreign imports ; another was that a considerable illicit manufacture of flint glass was carried on in attics and cellars. There was, in happy contrast to this obscurantism, one important vein of sagacity in the latter days of the Protectionist epoch. The reasons alleged in favour of prohibiting the export of new machinery and, if possible, new processes are every whit as impressive as those adduced in favour of protec- tive import duties. Nevertheless, the eighteenth century restrictions intended to create a monopoly of home invention were rapidly abandoned ; and the export of machinery has ever since been one of the largest and most lucrative departments of British business. No far-sighted statesmanship produced this result, but plain self-interest. Foreign visitors were often refused access to mills containing new machinery ; and attempts were occasionally made to prevent the emigration of specially skilled artisans. Nevertheless, the factory and railroad engineers of the Continent — especially Germany and Russia — and of America were commonly trained by Scottish and English managers. " It appears," a Commons Committee reported in 1824, " that, notwithstanding the laws enacted to prevent the seduction of artisans to go abroad, many able § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 85 and intelligent artisans have gone abroad to reside and to exercise their respective arts, and that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, by law to prevent artisans who may be so determined from going out of the country." In the following year, these laws were repealed. The export of certain kinds of machinery remained under prohibition for many years ; but there was little difficulty in most cases in getting exemption under the dis- cretionary powers of the Board of Trade. The clash of interests was more apparent than real. Since the machine-making must evidently precede in their development the machine-using trades, the would-be exporters had attained a strong influence before the would-be prohibiters could bring any pressure on Parliament. The whole business of production was too prosperous to favour such a rivalry. Manufactures in other lands were undoubtedly benefited ; at the worst, that was only a brief anticipation of the inevitable. On the other hand, there was a great immediate profit, a long start in the international race. Both the manufactures making and those using machinery were spurred on ; and it was not an evil thing that the stimulus was continued in later years by foreign competition. Meanwhile, England became known throughout the world as the home of inven- tion, and by her policy drew to herself both brains and the necessary materials which she did not herself produce. But the miracle of the time was the growth of 86 MODEEN ENGLAND [chap. ii. the textile trades, and, especially, of the cotton manufacture. In 1785, the import of raw cotton had amounted to 18 miUion Ifes., most of this being still used with linen warp ; in 1800, just before Cartwright's power-loom came into use, it was 56 million Bbs. During the war, this figure was not greatly exceeded ; but in 1817 it reached 116 million lbs. ; in another decade, it was doubled ; in 1835, it passed 333 million lbs. ; and by 1850 this prodigious volume of consumption was again doubled. There is, perhaps, no more significant phenomenon in the history of England. The wool trade is not so easily measured ; but we know that its progress, considerable as it is, has been much slower than this. The whole increase of supplies of raw material in the first third of the century is estimated at 80 per cent. ; and exports in that period increased very little. In 1840, M'Cidloch estimated the total value of woollens produced in Great Britain at £21 millions, the number of employees at 332,000 ; the value of cotton goods produced he put at £34 millions, and the number of workers at about one miUion. If it were our task here to trace the development of political-economic thought, we should have to show that the optimistic school of Robert Owen rose as naturally from the contemplation of man's power of exploiting a tropical product as the pessi- mistic school of the Rev. T. R. Malthus rose from the contemplation of the demoralized rural labourer. The true synthesis of these things was not to § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 87 come for many years. The chief feature of the miracle was not an industrial fact, the invention of machinery and power, but an agricultural fact, the necessarily greater plenty and cheapness of cotton, a Southern vegetable product, as compared with wool, a Northern animal product, or even with linen. The inventors, of course, were quite impartial ; and, as an ancient privileged industry, the wool trade would have had the preference, were that possible. But cotton rose in price during the war less than wool ; and, afterwards, the novel spectacle was presented of a trade being able to get the whole of its raw material from thousands of miles away more cheaply and regularly than a rival trade which had boasted of having at its doors the best supplies in the world. Wool at the end of the eighteenth century was more than twice as dear as it had been at the beginning. In 1814, the prices were nearly identical ; but in 1821 wool was Is. 3d., and cotton 9jd. per lb. ; in 1827 wool was 9d., and cotton 6|d. ; in 1832 wool was Is., cotton 6jd. The competition was, however, mutually advan- tageous. English sheep-farming was quickened ; the yield of native wool was improved in quality, and greatly increased in quantity. It is usually taken for granted that the general reader has a sufficient understanding of spinning and weaving and other primary industrial processes to enable him to appreciate the machine revolu- tion. This seems a rather large assumption in the twentieth century, when the old handicrafts sur- 88 MODERN ENGLAND [chap, m vive in only a few remote corners of the country, and when factory labour is so much divided that few operatives see more than one stage of produc- tion. Let us attempt very briefly to outUne the nature of the great textile transformation. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, wool, cotton, and flax were still commonly spun by the ancient means of distaff and spindle. The distaff was a stick around one end of which the raw wool, already cleaned and combed, was loosely wound ; the spindle was a second stick which received the flocculent stuff in the form of a continuous thread or yarn. This is made possible by the peculiar structure of the fibre : the surface of every hair being covered with minute scales, the hairs inter- lock when pressed together ; and, if they have' been previously reversed, they interlock so strongly that they can be drawn through a machine without breaking. Holding the distaff under one arm, the spinner coaxed out a thread, and fastened it into a notch in the top of the spindle. The right hand then set the spindle rotating (a ring of stone or clay round the upper part helping to give a steady momentum), by a half -throwing, half-turning movement ; and, while the right hand spun, the left was continually freeing from the distaff a new supply. As the yarn became sufficiently twisted and drawn out, it was notched at a farther point, and so on till the spindle was full. The first im- provement of this primitive labour was the very simple one of the spinning-wheel, the spindle being § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 89 set in a frame, and rotated by means of a hand wheel. Then a treadle was attached to the wheel ; and, toward the end of the eighteenth century, a double-spindle wheel was made, with " flyers " or twisting arms attached to the spindles. The main work was now not the actual spinning, but the feeding of the spindle. While the woman, in this nearly universal home industry, produced the yarn, the man did the heavier laboiu- of weaving it into cloth. This consisted essentially in passing one system of threads, called the woof or weft, alternately under and over a transverse system of threads, called the warp or web. Until about 1778, linen yarn was always \ised for the wai"p ; only afterwards was cotton spun strongly enough to be used alone. The loom was thus a frame holding a row of yarns (the wtu'p) in such a manner that certain threads could be raised, and others depressed, while a shuttle carried the weft-thread through them. The process was substantially the same for cloth- making, and for net- or lace-work, for the making of fabric of uniform colour, and for pattern-weaving, although the loom in the latter cases was more complicated. Double weaving (Kidderminster carpeting is an example) consisted in weaving two webs simultaneously one above the other, and interweaving the two at intervals so as to form a double cloth. After weaving, the cloth had to go through the " fulling " process, in which the fibre was beaten or pressed so that the scales 90 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. interlocked closely ; it was then washed, " tented " (stretched), dressed in various manners, and was at length ready for the dyer. We can now more easily realize what it was that Hargreaves, Arkwright, Cartwright, ('rompton, and Watt accomplished. The spinning-jenny * was a simple arrangement by which a number of spindles could be kept turning by a hand- wheel. At the outset it enabled eight threads to be spun as easily as one had been ; later, it was so much improved that a little girl could work eighty or a hundred spindles. The jenny, however, could not give yam strong enough for the longitudinal threads, or warp. This deficiency was met by Arkwright's water-frame, a radically different machine, after- wards, in improved form, known as the " throstle." This consisted essentially of two pairs of rollers, turned by water or steam power. The lower roller of each pair was furrowed or fluted, while the upper ones were covered with leather, the better to hold and draw the raw cotton. Instead of being merely compressed, therefore, as would be the case if the rollers were smooth, it was drawn through flutings, at first at a moderate speed, then, in the second pair, more rapidly ; and, while the " sliver " or " roving " was thus \>(:hifr drawn to a thread of the desired tenuity, a twist was given to it by an adaptation of the spindle and flyer arrangement. ' There wan no Jenny in the chho ; the name U probably ft cor* ruption of "engine." In thn Kftmc way, wc have Kll Wbltney'i cotton " gin," or cleaning machine. § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 91 Crompton's " mule " combined parts of the jeraiy and of the spinning-frame, and differed from the latter chiefly in the method of twisting and winding the thread. Both methods continued in use, as they gave rather different results, the throstle yam being of a closer twist, stronger and more even, and thus better for warps and for thread- making, while the " mule " gave a wider range of fineness, a softer yam, good for both twist and weft. Throstle yam cost more, but commanded a better price. The cost of hand-mule spinning led, after many efforts, to the creation of the " self-acting mule," patented about 1825 by Richard Roberts, and further improved by the " quadrant winding motion " in 1830. Meanwhile, power had been applied to the loom, the first successful experiment being carried out in 1801 with two hundred looms in Mr Monteith's weaving null at PoUockshaws, near Glasgow. There were then already thirty-two steam-engines applied to the spinning process in Manchester alone. The power-loom made only slow headway for many years. In 1813, there were believed to be 2400 in use in England and Scotland, in 1820 perhaps 15,000, and in 1833, 100,000.^ The number of the old hand-looms employed in the cotton manufacture was estimated to be between 200,000 and 250,000 in 1820; and it rather increased than diminished between then and 1834, when evidence was given, before the Commons * Balnes, History oj the Cotton Manufacture, 92 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. Committee on the condition of the weavers, that there were nearly 50,000 in Scotland alone. This is a singular fact, when we remember the demand for more weaving capacity to meet the increase of spinning, and the economy of production with the aid of power. Baines gives a manufacturer's estimate that, whereas a very good adult hand- weaver could weave two pieces of shirting of a certain kind per week, a steam-weaver only fifteen years old, attending two looms, could in 1823 weave seven similar pieces, and in 1826 twelve pieces ; while in 1833 an older man, aided by a girl of twelve years, could attend four looms, and weave eighteen or twenty pieces This was a vast economy, but not as striking as that effected on the spinning side, and the necessary improvement of the machinery was more slowly reached. The hand- weavers made a desperate fight of it. They had at first an advantage in being able to make finer cloth than machinery could produce ; and cheap yarn was a stimulus to them as well as to the power-weavers (there was never too much yam, because the surplus was promptly exported)i For the rest, it was a question of lowering their prices till the bottom point of a bare subsistence was touched. During the crisis after the war, handweavers' wages fell to pittances of from 9d. to Is. 4d. per day of 16 or 18 hours. The sudden and almost complete stoppage of hand-spinning on the introduction of machinery and steam appears, then, to have been merciful by com- § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 98 parison with the slow degradation of the hand- weaver, sinking at every moment of special pressure into indescribable misery. Nor was it only in England that this effect was produced. Weavers all over Europe welcomed the supplies of cheap British machine-made yarn ; and the consequent supersession of hand-spinning wrought no such misery as followed the slower establishment of factory weaving. As surely as the dyer's hand shows his trade does the technique of every industry, from the simplest to the most complex, reflect itself not only in the individual, but in the collective and social, character of the workers. The historian of economic development is often compelled to present labour in the lump, a disembodied spirit resembling none of the living labourers we have known in the past or present, in one place or another. Space forbids him to translate his shorthand back into the language of real experience : all he can do is to warn his readers from time to time that no symbol can do justice to the infinite variety of human beings and their affairs. We may illustrate the point by noting the difference between the poor weaver, whose lot we have just traced, and the poor hosiery knitter referred to in preceding pages as a victim of the disruption and a machine-breaker. In the last resort, it depends on the difference between a darn, and a loop or stitch. The cloth weaving-frame, or loom, is nearly as old as history, a hoary implement of household servitude. The 94 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. knitting-frame dates only from 1589^ and hand- knitting seems to be not very much older. The difficulty of mechanically reproducing the variety of movements of the housewife's fingers is evident. A young clergyman of Calverton, Notts, Wm. Lee, M.A., solved the problem, however. " He did not attempt to make a seamless stocking, but made a fiat web of the proper shape, varying in its width from calf to ankle, so that when the edges were sewn together a properly shaped stocking appeared. The machine, a contrivance of wheels and levers, required eleven distinct movements to be made by the hands and feet of the operator, but it achieved the same result as the movements of the human hand. To obtain this, each of the loops which a hand knitter gathers side by side on one or more pins, he placed upon the point of a separate needle fixed in the frame, hence the name ' frame-work knitting.' " ^ Long before the time of the great textile inventions, this ingenious machine was building up an important trade in London and Nottingham, consisting not only of stockings but brightly coloured piece-goods to be cut up for caps, waistcoats, scarves, gloves, and shirts. By 1740, there were 10,000 hand-frames at work, and the operatives could live comfortably on half-a-week's wages. At first, every frame-owner was also a worker, though he might have journeymen ; and the London trade, speaking through its livery company, » " The Hosiery Trade," by Anthony Mundella : Co-operative Wholesale Annual, 1893. § IV.] liRSf CENSUS 1^0 PETERLOO 95 exercised a certain check upon individual rapacity, even in the provinces. It was never, perhaps, a very- wise control ; and it carried less and less weight in Nottinghamshire. At the same time, many of the home-workers, already hit by the agrarian revolu- tion, were becoming dependent upon merchants and lesser middlemen for the hire of their frames, and were being subjected to the competition of pauper apprentices who, when they grew up, them- selves necessarily became frame-hirers. As early as 1710, there was frame-breaking in London, due to the surplus of apprentices, and to depression from the disuse of bright colours and fancy patterns. Merchant employment constantly increased, at the expense of individual work. With the lapse of the old control, quality deteriorated ; and the com- plaint resounded that honest workmanship had become impossible. Wages fell, and work became precarious, while bread was rising to famine prices. The London company being now powerless to help them, the workers founded, in 1776, what was, perhaps, the first modern trade union. They then obtained the introduction of a parliamentary Bill to fix and regulate pay and frame-rents. Inquiry showed that the renting system was a means of extortion, and involved a continual surplus of productive power which kept many workers at starvation point. The Bill was thrown out ; but, after the smashing of a hundred frames in Notting- ham, a scale of payments was agreed to which held till the end of the century. 78 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. And here we come to the great difference : it was comparatively easy to hitch a steam-engine to the loom; the knitting-frame remained a hand machine until the middle of the nineteenth century. Adaptations were invented : in 1758, Jedidiah Strutt patented his attachment for making ribbed hosiery; in 1764 began the modification of Lee's frame on which the machine-made lace trade is based. Silk knitting centred in Derby, woollen in Leicester, cotton in Nottingham. The number of stocking-frames did not greatly increase till after the war. In 1812, there were estimated to be 30,000 ; in 1833, 33,000, mostly for making cotton hose, engaging 73,000 workers, and a floating capital of more than a million sterling. The net- machine, rude as it was, had brought the patentees large fortunes ; when the patent expired, it was simplified and improved, so that the output was multiplied twelve-fold, and a quantity formerly valued at £5 could be sold for 2s. 6d. In 1833, it was estimated that the bobbin-net trade embraced 837 machine owners, and a capital of nearly two millions sterling. The net earnings of male opera- tives were said to average 16s,, of women 6s,, and of children 2s. 6d., a week. The hand lace-maker suffered ; but the more important occupation of stocking-knitting remained, in the main, as it had been, a domestic industry. The knitter was always poor, but he had not to wage an impossible battle against a steam-machine ; and, while it was limited to hand-labour, the § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 97 industry pursued a fairly even development. In 1804, there was an unsuccessful attempt to revive the regulative powers of the London Company. Parhament was again asked to suppress " spurious " or " cut-up " goods, and to fix a minimum wage. The Luddite outrages, because their authors com- manded general sympathy, proved rather more effective. After the repeal of the combination laws, the frame-work knitters' union gathered strength. There were still dire days before them ; but by the time a rotary action was given, and steam power was applied, to the stocking-frame, free trade was accomplishing its beneficent work ; and still many years were to pass ere the great body of the trade passed into the factory stage. That the hosiery manufacture thus escaped a degrading convulsion must be the chief reason for the preserva- tion of a high morale and intelligence in its opera- tives, a fact illustrated in their pioneering work for industrial conciliation. One other among many trades subsidiary to cheap cotton may be here mentioned. Despite heavy duties, the printing of cotton cloths in- creased tenfold in the first third of the century, thanks to the substitution of metal cylinders engraved with the pattern, in place of wooden blocks, and, at a later date, to the introduction of multi-colour printing. Something was done, and more attempted, during the first twenty years of the century to improve the now seriously inadequate means of travel, 6 98 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. communications, and the transport of goods. To modem eyes, the levying of rates at toll-bars seems a very crude way of finding money for road-building ; but in its time the turnpike system, despite un- sound finance, inequality of incidence, and various abuses, brought with it great benefits. The pack- horse, the lumbering-waggon, the migrating herd of cattle no longer received first .consideration. Fast coaches carried passengers and mails daily between the chief towns ; lighter types of waggon, cart, and carriage followed the tracks firmly laid by Telford and Macadam, and, in turn, brought a crop of comfortable hostelries in their train. The height of the coach and turnpike period was reached in 1837, when tolls yielded a revenue of a million and a half sterling. At a cost of over five millions sterling, a network of 2600 miles of canals had been created in England, with 276 miles in Ireland, and 225 miles in Scotland, during the latter half of the eighteenth century. The port of London may almost be said to have been reconstructed with the opening, in 1800-1, of the Grand Junction and Paddington canals, and in 1802-6 of the West India, London, and East India Docks. The " railroad " was already familiar, and the steam coach was an accomplished fact ; the steam locomotive was still to come. Wooden rails — narrow planks bound by " sleepers " at intervals- had long been in use at mine-heads and the water- side for the easier carriage of heavy goods. The § IV.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 99 Coalbrookdale works had begun to make iron rails in 1767 ; the first iron tramway available to the public on payment of tolls was opened between Wandsworth and Croydon in 1803. In 1811, there were 150 miles of such iron tracks in connection with the canals, collieries, and iron-works of South Wales. Trevethick's high-pressure steam loco- motive, tried at Merthyr Tydfil in 1804, proved more expensive than horses. In 1811, Blenkinsop was more successful with his cog-wheel and rack engine, at Leeds. Two years later, William Hedley's "Puffing Billy" and " Wylam Dilly " were running at a colliery near Newcastle ; and in 1814 George Stephenson's first engine, the " Blucher," drew a load of thirty tons at four miles an hour up a gradient of 1 in 450. While the experimental period was thus wearing to a close, many snorting vehicles were carrying adventurous passengers upon the high roads. In the early days of the locomotive engine, indeed, steam omnibuses were crowded ; and perhaps it was chiefly the heavy turnpike tolls and the resistance of the horse-coach proprietors that prevented them from developing as the motor-bus has done in our own time. Meantime, steam power was being more easily applied to water carriage. Robert Fulton had constructed a small steamer, which behaved very indifferently in a trial trip on the Seine in 1803. Napoleon, viewing haughty Albion from his camp at Boulogne, proved inexplicably, incrediblys blind to the American inventor's blandishments. In 100 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. 1807 Fulton's " Claremont," with an Englisfi- built engine, covered the 142 miles up the Hudson River from New York to Albany in 32 hours— the first successful long trip. A steam barge had run on the Thames in the first year of the century; but it was not until 1812 that a regular passenger service was started, Henry Bell's " Comet," a boat forty feet long and of four horse-power, running between Glasgow, Greenock, and Helensburgh, at five miles an hour. In 1815, a paddle-steamer built at Glasgow, and brought round by sea, began to ply on the Thames from London to Margate ; and we soon read that " from the costliness of these vessels, their extensive accommodations and splen- did decorations, they are universally designated ' steam yachts.' " ^ This was the great time when the China clippers could do as much as 436 sea miles in a day's sail, thanks to build and rig, and not less to the skill and daring evolved in two hundred years of maritime adventure. Science and money do not easily overcome such rivalry as this ; and in 1835 the estimable Dr Lardner could still describe as " perfectly chimerical, as much so as a voyage to the moon," the voyage from Liverpool to New York by steam which was, in fact, made three years later. The reaction after the war affected the volume of 1 Ijeigh's New Picture of London (1818), where it is estimated that there were then 10,000 steam-engines in Great Britain, doing the work of " 225,000 brewers' healthful horses," which would have needed 1,237,500 acres of land to provide them with subsistence. § v.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 101 British sea-traffic even more seriously than the war itself had done. The registered shipping belonging to Great Britain had been doubled between 1783 and the end of the century, had then risen to 2J million tons in 1816, and fell somewhat short of this figure in 1820. Except in 1810, 1814-15, and 1818, foreign trade varied little from the level of 30 millions of imports and 40 millions of exports through the two decades. V. The First " Over-Pboduction " Crisis Returning to the course of events after Waterloo, we note the alarming appearance of a phenomenon which was to become a characteristic feature of nineteenth-century industrialism, — the wave-like movement of economic life between extremes of " glut " and " boom," depression and a fever of speculative expansion. Fluctuations, of course, there had always been ; and periodic outbreaks of speculative mania had occurred ever since joint- stock-trading had risen to exploit the wealth of the newly discovered East and West. But, before the Industrial Revolution, there could be nothing like the modern " trade crisis," the special featizre of which is the trouble variously termed " over-pro- duction " or " under-consumption." Natural con- ditions, social conditions, and State policy all made it impossible. Capital, credit, labour, and com- modities were so limited in supply that there was little possibility of excess power of production, and 102 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. therefore little speculation; and the restrictive policy of the State made it still less. Widespread famine sometimes occurred, and much more often a local dearth. Nearly everything depended on the produce of the land. The failure of a harvest might mean terrible suffering, as it does among the Russian peasantry to-day. Even this sort of mischief, however, was of a different and more limited kind than it now is. The Russian peasant suffers not from a simple harvest failure, but from the coincidence of a bad crop with a burden of taxation proper only to a sound and wealthy in- dustrial State. He has to sell his com in a foreign market to pay the interest on enormous foreign loans ; and he has to sell at the international price, whatever it may be. The small subsistence farming which was the prevalent type in England until the middle of the eighteenth century offered no glorious rewards ; neither did it involve the penalties of modern agriculture, in which a general famine is impossible, but prices, credit, and taxation may at any point be factors as important as the weather. Morland's pictures and the poems of Gray and Goldsmith may idealize the old rural order ; yet the significance of this broad fact, that the sturdy yeoman and the hardy conamoner disappeared, leaving the wealthy landlord and the pauperized wage-labourer in their place, cannot be denied. In industry and trade, the transformation gradually became a much more considerable affair, and, necessarily, in its early stage, the gain was least § v.] riRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 103 and the loss greatest. It was an interval of sheer anarchy. The old economic organization was destroyed ; a new organization was not created. A magical power of multiplying commodities fell into greedy hands, without any social restraint. The local market was outgrown ; so crude were banking and transport, we can hardly speak of there being a national market before the railway era ; and foreign commerce was chiefly a disturbing factor, leaping forward and falling back according to the fortunes of the great war. There was, therefore, in the early trade crises of the century, something evil belonging to the old order, and something which we have only come to understand in recent years. We may liken the one to an injury, the other to a contagion. More depended then than now upon home agriculture, which directly engaged a third of the population, and in most years could feed the remainder also. If a crop failed, every humble table in the land immedi- ately suffered. If the harvest was abundant, prices fell and the farmer gained nothing. The impossible ideal of the landed classes who dominated in the State was to maintain scarcity prices in days of plenty. Thus, to the natural fluctuation of crops, the long irregularity of foreign supplies owing to the war, and the terrible weight of taxes, was added the artificial obstruction of the Corn Law. Reasonable enter- prise in farming was killed by this system as surely as the consumer was injured. Manufacture and trade partook no less, perhaps more, of the nature 104 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. il. of gambling. In the new machine industries; especially, the power of production was so much eiUarged that prices could fall greatly and yet profits increase. The spirit of competitive adventure was restrained, however, neither by wise calculation, nor by social pressure. The art of marketing, as we now have it, was undreamed of. All the available skill was used in cheapening processes ; the rest was left to chance. After Waterloo, shiploads of goods were hurried oft to the Continent and America ; and no one seems to have been so much surprised as the owners to find that they could not be sold except at ruinous prices. These are crucial examples of the direct economic shock or injury.^ As experience cured this kind of blunder, the second sort of mischief, which we have likened to a contagion, became more pronounced. The old static, localized life was rapidly passing away. The great mass of the people had come to depend on wages, generally on day wages. They had no other resource, no reserve power with which to resist • The following export figures illustrate the fluctuations of this period : — Brass and Copper Woollen Cotton Bar Iron Pig Iron Manufactures Cloths Goods (tons). (tons). (owts.). (pieces). (£ millions). 1814 15,468 307 73,248 *638,369 20 1816 20,870 953 128,044 467,222 16-5 1818 42,095 3048 148,490 446,872 18-7 1819 23,765 906 115,998 340,044 146 1821 34,093 4484 149,444 375,464 16-0 1825 25,613 2815 • 90.064 1816. 384,880 18-3 I v.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 105 the pressure of competition, exploitation, or fluctua- tion. Merchants and manufacturers were similarly falling subject to forces beyond their own control — ^variations of demand, price, and credit. And, in all this, there was a new sensitiveness, a quickness of reaction which carried waves of stimulus or dis- couragement, alternately, from one trade to another, from end to end, and from bottom to top, of the economic structure. Panic or elation — slow-going at first, under cover of the fourpenny newspaper stamp, then riding behind Stephenson's " Rocket," finally flashing over land and under sea by the electric cable : and never an attempt, only here and there in some heretical brain the vaguest idea of an attempt being some day made, to convert the Gk)vemment of the land into a guiding intelKgence amid the scramble for bread and wealth. We shall see trade crises succeeding one another throughout the century, developing into an irregular cyclic movement, extending in scope and complexity with the international extension of commerce and the mutual dependence of businesses, and pro- voking at length a general revision of political- economic theory. At the outset, it is a story of Homeric simplicity in which everybody seems to be fighting desperately, and nobody seems to understand why. Certainly not the " four-bottle " statesmen of the Oligarchy, now watching the arena with some vague alarm. People were astounded that peace did not bring immediate prosperity with it; they would have 106 MODERN ENGLAND [chap, ii, been still more astounded if they could have looked forward over the next thirty years. It is difficult even now to imagine the utter exhaustion and derangement produced by twenty years of warfare coinciding with radical economic change. Of such a diseased condition, there can be no sudden cure. Fifty millions of Government expenditure were suddenly cut off ; while taxation was reduced by seventeen millions — a relief urgently necessary, which must in time bring a healthy reaction. But the first result was seen in the disbandment of three hundred thousand soldiers and sailors, who swarmed over the country either competing for wages with men already in desperate straits, or falling upon the poor rates. The whole Western world was pinched. Some day harvests might grow more richly for the blood shed on the Napoleonic battlefields, but not yet. Little more than a coastal belt of America was under the plough. The very fact that England approached nearly, in normal times, to a self-sufficiency of food supply made it difficult in emergency to obtain other resources ; and the rise of prices was always much greater than the deficiency of the harvest. Thus, wheat ran up from 52s. 6d. in January 1816 to 117s. in June 1817. At the former date, rural labourers were thrown out of employment ; at the latter, the acutest distress appeared in the in- dustrial towns. The harvest of 1816 was one of the worst ever known. It was estimated that a quarter of the § v.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 107 agricultural rent of England, some nine millions sterling, had to be remitted, and that thirteen thousand persons emigrated. There was a general withdrawal of credit ; and many small banks failed. Perhaps the worst suffering was in Ire- land, where the peasants were eating mustard- seed, nettles, and potato-tops. In East Anglia, there were serious riots, with rick- and bam-buming — a new omen. In the Fens, the cultivation of the low-lying land was largely abandoned. Gangs of discharged labourers made a devastating march on Ely ; thirty-four of them were sentenced to death, and five were actually executed. In the Midlands, there was a recrudescence of the Luddite riots, many lace-frames being destroyed in the Lough- borough district. The cessation of Government orders for small arms was severely felt in Bir- mingham, where, out of a population of 84,000, about 27,500 were receiving parish relief in 1817. Brougham told the House of Commons that the average wage-rate of a thousand weavers had been 13s. 3d. a week in 1800, slightly higher in 1802, 10s. 6d. in 1806, 6s. 7d. in 1808, 5s. 2d. in 1816, and " had now reached the fearful point of 4s. 3^d., from which, when the usual expenses paid for the loom were deducted, there remained no more than 3s. 3d. to support human life for seven days. How could people sustain existence on such a sum ? He had been told that half a pound of oatmeal daily, mixed with a little salt and water, consti- tuted the whole food of many of them. Charity was 108 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. out of the question — the case was far beyond it." Iron furnaces were blown out, coal-pits closed, and factories shut. A body of unemployed colliers set out for London to present a petition and two waggons of coal, which they dragged with them, to the Regent. They were stopped by the police, and returned peacefully to their bare homes. Many families, forbidden relief for lack of a legal " settle- ment," wandered about the countryside, begging. Others were carted thither and hither among the fourteen thousand parishes of England at the cost of the rates, in a mad endeavour of each dis- trict to throw off all but its own paupers. Irish immigration was already making itself felt. In the report of the Commons Committee on mendicity and vagrancy (1816), we read of a certain court of twenty-four houses near Portman Square, London, where seven hundred Irish lived in squalor, distress, and profligacy, totally neglected by the parish, and banned by their neighbours. The tribe of Dick Tui'pin plagued the high-roads no more ; but the city was infested at this time with thieves, the police often being in league with them ; and covered places like Covent Garden were the scenes of nightly orgies, in which men and women, boys and girls, took part. There is hardly a ray of reason in the social prospect. A rural M.P., Mr Curwen, proposed the abolition of poor rates, and the substitution of a contributory insurance system administered by parochial committees. He was § VI.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 109 laughed out ; and, a generation later, Harriet Martineau thought it " scarcely necessary to dwell upon the practical absurdity of this benevolent dream." The absurd dream has been reduced to business fact in our own day. VI. Pioneers of Reform This black year, 1816, was the year of Cole- ridge's Christabel and Kuhla Khan, of the third canto of Childe Harold, of Scott's Antiquary and Old Mortality. Keats was working at Endymion, De Quincey at the new German metaphysics. It could hardly be said of these that they were "cradled into poetry by wrong." Circumstance puts its stamp even upon genius. In the light of the events of the time, the " Romantic Revival " appears mainly as an evasion of painful realities, an escape from the choice between subservience and rebelhon, by a flight into the realms of the supernatural, the supererotic, the barbarian, the medieval. In the sensuous riot of The Erl- King, my Lord Castlereagh is forgotten for a few moments. The best that can be said is that Eng- land, being less emasculated than the Continent by long warfare, does not sink to the same depth of morbidity. But everywhere the Romantic move- ment is contaminated with sex license, opium, insanity, and suicide. " My flame is still Marianna," Byron writes from Venice to Thomas Moore (Dec, 24, 1816) ; and he continues : " And now what 110 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. art thou doing ? Are you not near the Luddites ? Bv the Lord ! if there's a row, but I U be among J How go on the weavers— the breakers of frames— the Lutherans of politics— the reformers ? " As the Liberty lads o'er the sea Bought theii freedom, and cheaply, with blood, So we, boys, we Will die fighting, or Uve free, And down with all kings but King Ludd." Sojthrough two more stanzas — " an amiable chanson for you, all impromptu. I have written it princi- pally to shock your neighbour — , who is all clergy and loyalty, mirth and iimocence, milk and water." Shelley, indoctrinated by his father-in-law, Godwin, shocked his neighbours to better purpose, risking his Muse in outbursts which echo alternately the Utopian individualism of Political Jtistice and the thunders of Paine's Bights of Man and Age of Reason. In commoner soil political ideas were germinating that were to grow strong, and presently to govern British life. The propertied and ruling class, by whatever party names it called itself, was now saturated with the self-defensive instincts to which Burke had given a formal and effective, if not exactly a philosophic, expression. Yet the voice of humane sympathy was never quite silenced.^ ' The protest of Lords Lauderdale and Bosslyn against the Act of 1812 making machine-breaking a capital ofience deserves to be quoted : " We think it our duty strongly and in distinct terms to § VI.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 111 Some of the ablest of the Whigs were developing towards what was to be called Liberalism; and an independent school of Individualist Radicals was beginning to gather. In 1815, Malthus stated clearly the doctrine of rent — ^the surplus of the price of the produce of land over cost of production, this cost on the worst land regulating the price of the whole supply. In 1817, in his Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Ricardo pro- claimed the tendency of wages to fall to subsistence level, and laid the basis of the orthodox economics of the near future. We shall return to these thinkers. While they wrote, there was appear- ing in another quarter the first glimmer of a real democratic movement. It was confused in its ideas ; ignorant men played havoc with its en- thusiasm ; but it had two sources of strength. Poverty was, for these pioneers of reform, a fact of daily experience, not an abstraction for theoretical analysis. There is, too, something very British in their faith, after a lifetime of disappointment, that, with an effort, the State could be made the servant of the people. On ways and means, they were vague and instable. We see here, in fact, in germ, the mixed elements still represented in British working-class life by the trade unions and co-operative societies, the Independent Labour reprobate the unprecedented folly of attempting to enlighten the minds of men in regard to what is beneficial to themselves by in- creased severity of punishment ; whilst every sound principle of criminal legislation makes ug regard such an addition to the long list of capital offences with astonishment and disgust." 112 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ii. Party, the Fabian expert, wire-pulling for the commonweal, the "Single Tax" enthusiast, and even the " Syndicalist " advocate of " direct action." Not that there was yet any definite pre- vision of Socialism, or anything like a philosophy of justice by violence. The violence was instinctive, driven by despair, though it proved so contagious in the case of the Luddite outrages as to suggest to alarmed minds a diabolical organization. With the definite commencement of a popular demand for Parliamentary reform, violence subsided. Paine, soldier and martyr of liberty, had died in 1809 ; but his " soul was marching on." It was now that Cobbett gained his great vogue. In November 1816, he boldly reduced the price of his Weekly Political Register from Is. 0|d. for a single octavo sheet to 2d., or 12s. 6d. per hundred copies. The Register found its way wherever men could read ; it was read aloud in village taverns and town meetings, and continued to be a force till Cobbett's death in 1833. From this time, the Radical press (aided, from 1814, by steam printing) became the chief formative influence upon popular opinion. Small groups of reformers sprang up all over the country, meeting sometimes in Methodist chapels, and requiring a subscription of a penny per week from their members. The leaders were humble men who had received a little education in Sunday School, and some practice in running local friendly societies. Knowing nothing of this world, so touchingly § VI.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 113 revealed to us in the recollections of the Lancashire weaver, Sanauel Bamtord, the Government thought, or pretended to think, that there was going to be an '89 in London. Cobbett was denounced as a sedition-monger, even while he was penning his open letter against the Luddites. A House of Commons elected by some fifteen thousand persons, its majority, indeed, appointed by two hundred wealthy patrons, the chief of them members of the other House, was not likely to give a sympathetic ear to the demands of the Hampden Clubs, the Union Clubs, the Spencean Philanthropists, and other bodies of agitators for annual Parliaments and uni- versal suffrage. Rather was it concerned to extend the game laws, already very severe, by making a poacher, or even a suspect, liable to transportation for seven years. Canning thanked God that the House of Commons did not reflect the popular will. This superciliousness of the Oligarchy was not its worst fault, or the next twenty years might have passed less unhappily. There was no organized revolutionary movement; but there was almost universal discontent. Francis Place, the Informa- tion Bureau incarnate of Hume and his Radical friends, declared that the Government employed agents provocateurs. They admittedly employed spies ; on the strength of informers' reports they undoubtedly misrepresented innocent agitation, and punished it, as dire conspiracy. The Spenceans, who anticipated the agrarian doctrine of Henry George, "the poor harmless 114 MODERN ]^N(iLAND toHAP. ti. a" as Place called them, "with their UwToAsisting of an old Bible and three or four small publications, a high pnest under the name of librarian, and some forty or fifty followers," i were held up to obloquy as authors of the Spa Fields riot. This was, in fact, a mob-march from Bermondsey to Cheapside, where the demonstrators and the crazy youngster who led them were met, faced, and easily dispersed, by the Lord Mayor, two friends, and five constables. The description of the affair by a secret Parliamentary Committee as " a most formidable organization of desperate men " did not prevent the City Council, a week later, from petition- ing the Throne in favour of reform, and declaring its grievances to be " the natural effect of the rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and per- tinaceously persisted in." The strength of the reformers lay in the ill-repute of the Government, not in any capacity or organization of their own. With Bamford's aid, we can see them, the Hampden Club of London, at one of their meetings in the Crown and Anchor Tavern. There is Sir Francis Burdett, in the chair, a little higher than the rest, proudly condescending ; Major Cartwright, a veteran (bald-headed and gentle, he still sits in effigy in Cartwright Gardens, near St Pancras) ; Cobbett, jolly, obstinate, pugnacious, shrewd, the supreme type of "John Bull" as Reformer «; I «™ham Wallas, Life oj Francis Place, p. 121. and sunburnt, with a bright smile, and an air compounded of § VI.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 115 " Orator Hunt," a blustering demagogue ; and Lord Cochrane, unaffectedly cordial. There is Dr Watson, perhaps a real Jacobin; and there are almost certainly some Government agents in the group. The air is pungent with tobacco smoke; and each man has a pot of porter before him. There are motions and amendments, and points of order, very naive and harmless. i:,But when a missile was thrown at the Regent, on his return from opening Parliament, and this was followed by a foolish attempt to march a body of petitioners — the " Blanketeers," so called from the blankets and knapsacks which they carried — from Manchester to London, all reasonable counsels were swept aside. The Habeas Corpus Act was hastily suspended ; and three Coercion Acts were pressed through, for the prevention of " seditious " meetings, the punishment of attempts to tamper with the army, and the special protection of the Regent. On April 1, 1817, at the Leicester Assizes, eight men were convicted of Luddite outrages, and six were executed a fortnight later. In June, a band of men, armed with pikes and some old guns, marched from Pentridge to near Nottingham under the leadership of a framework-knitter named Brandreth, whose family had received poor relief. They were stopped and chased by a party of soldiers ; the soldier and the farmer." Bamford adds that "he was dressed in a bhie coat, yellow swansdown waistcoat, drab kersey small- clothes, and top-boota. He was a perfect representative of what he always wished to be, an English gentleman farmer." 116 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ri. ultimately, three of them were executed, eleven were transported for life, and four for fourteen years, while five were imprisoned for various terms. Lords Landsdowne, Erskine, and Holland told the Government plainly that there was no evidence of a wide revolutionary spirit, and that the real troubles were due to genuine discontent. Romilly declared his belief that the whole of this " Derby- shire insurrection " was the work of Government emissaries. Bamford was arrested on suspicion of high treason, brought to London, examined five times before the Privy Council, and then discharged. A State prosecution of twenty-four reformers at York broke down completely. But the Govern- ment scored one point : on March 28, 1818, William Cobbett fled to America. During his two years' absence, the agitation collapsed. An access of speculative excitement was now taken for a general revival of trade. Prices, both agricultural and industrial, recovered sufficiently during 1818 to stimulate enterprise. An interest- ing sign of this is to be found in a well-organized strike of Lancashire cotton-spinners, maintained, by subscriptions and levies on other trades, for ten weeks, but unsuccessful in the end. The relief was quickly reflected in Parliamentary and public discussion. Habeas Corpus was restored. Several small measures were passed to prevent the payment of wages by " truck." The evil operation of poor- law relief in lieu of wages, which we shall consider more fully in our next chapter, was mooted in § VI.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 117 reports of a Committee presided over by Sturges Bourne ; and, in the following year, a small reform was effected. Another Committee, under Brougham, exposed the scandalous lack of popular schools, and the abuse of educational charities. According to Brougham, there were in England 166,000 children in endowed schools, and 478,000 in schools dependent entirely on the casual support of the parents — a total of 644,000 scholars, or one-fourteenth of the population, as compared with one-twentieth in Wales, and one-ninth in Scotland (where every parish had at least one school)* There were also 5100 Sunday Schools, having 452,000 scholars. Out of 12,000 parishes in England, 8500 had no school of any kind. £35,000 had been spent in 1816 in purchasing the Elgin Marbles. A million pounds was voted in 1818 for building churches. The idea of spending State money on instruction for the conamon people was dismissed as foolish and dangerous. In vain a few enlightened men demanded the restitution of moneys left by " pious founders " for the education of the poor, and diverted, or merely stolen. Taxation remained inordinately heavy. The unredeemed debt stood at £791 millions in 1819, and the charges, including Sinking Fund, at £45 millions. No Budget could be squared without a fresh loan. The resumption of cash payments, inevitable as it was, and long overdue, was for long after 1819 a serious disturbing factor, since debts contracted in depreciated money had to be paid 118 MODERN ENGLAND [ohap. ii. at full value. To cap all, the trade revival suddenly ceased. Drought in the shires was followed by stagnation and a fall of wages in the towns. Parlia- ment was at once inundated with petitions for increased corn duties and poor-law reform. Robert Owen's scheme for a system of farm colonies, and his successful experiment in model industrial conditions at New Lanark, were much discussed. The agitation for parliamentary reform sprang up with new force, led at Westminster by Lord John Russell, and in the North by bodies of men who now commonly assumed the name of Radicals. For the first time, also, we find women participat- ing with men in working-class meetings. Large demonstrations were held during the summer in Yorkshire, at Glasgow, Stockport, and Birmingham. One of them, the occasion of the " Peterloo Massacre," was to become famious in history. Bamf ord, one of the lesser leaders, prints a convinc- ing account of what occurred. I\all notice had been given that a county meeting was to be held on St Peter's Field, Manchester, to demand aboh- tion of the Corn Law and a representative House of Commons. No objection was raised. In the hot, sunny morning of August 16, 1819, contingents of quiet men, decently attired in their " Sunday best," carrying flags and laurel branches " as a token of amity and peace," well marshalled, with a few bands of music, tramped up to town, and took up their position in a dense mass, be- tween fifty and eighty thousand strong, near the § VI.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 119 " hustings." There was no interference, so far. But a large military force, including horse artillery, had been gathered ; and, directly the meeting was opened, a force of mounted yeomanry (consisting chiefly, it was said, of local manufacturers) and 320 Hussars were launched upon it, the apparent aim being to arrest the speakers. Under this onslaught, and in the consequent disorder, six or eight of the de- monstrators were killed, and between four and five hundred were injured. The thing itself was not so bad as the crass stupidity of its authors, and the commendation they received in the highest circles. The news sent a wave of indignation rolling through the country. Carlyle, looking back to this and like events, spoke of "the treasury of rage burning, hidden or visible, in all hearts ever since, more or less perverting the efforts and aim of all hearts ever since." " The worst of it all is," Sydney Smith thought, " that a considerable portion of what these rascals say is so very true." Earl Fitzwilliam and the Duke of Hamilton were more sympathetic. Earl Grey, Lord Erskine, and others protested that the Peterloo meeting was perfectly legal. But the Government was deaf to all sense, and succeeded in exciting Parliamentary alarm so far that six sepa- rate "gagging" Acts were rapidly passed, effecting, as Sir James Mackintosh said, an almost complete suspension of the Constitution. The Seditious Meetings Bill Hmited the right of attending meet- ings to local residents, and required a prior notice 120 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. signed by seven householders. The Blasphemous and Seditious Libels Bill enacted severe punishment, including transportation, for second offences. The Misdemeanours Bill expedited the procedure in such cases. Another Act prohibited military training, except under authority of a magistrate ; and the Seizure of Arms Act gave powers of search and arrest. Finally, the Newspaper Act required the payment of stamp duties on all the cheap, small pamphlets which were the chief means of ventilating public opinion at the time. On his accession, early in 1820, George IV justified this Metternichian programme by reference to a " flagrant and sanguinary conspiracy lately detected." The nearest approach to such a thing of which evidence remains lay in two events far removed from each other, without any general support, and crude to the point of absurdity in design and execution. The first was the Cato Street Conspiracy, a wild project to kill the Ministry when they were at dinner together. An informer revealed the plot ; its existence was known and talked of in Ministerial circles six weeks beforehand. London, however, was duly " panic-stricken " by the " discovery." ^ Thistlewood, the leader, ' " Those who are old enough to have a distinct recolleotion of those times are astonished to think how great was the panic wliioh could esdst without any evidence at all ; how prodigious were the Radical forces which were always heard of, but never seen ; how country gentlemen, well armed, scoured the fields and lanes, and met on heaths, to fight the enemy, who never came ; and how, even in the midst of towns, young ladies carried heavy planks and ironing § VI.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 121 and four others were executed; and five persons were transported for life. Edwards, the spy, or agent provocateur, disappeared, to enjoy his pay. In the following April, placards were posted in Glasgow announcing a strike ; and forty or fifty men marched to Kilsyth with the crazy notion of seizing the Carron Iron Works. The yeomanry dispersed them in the " battle of Bonnymuir"; and three of the leaders were executed.. The fact seems to be that the plight of the working people was too desperate to leave them, any energy for revolutionary plotting. Some respectable witnesses say that the winter had been marked throughout the manufacturing districts by an awful silence. The opening of the Indian markets had greatly stimulated the cotton trade ; and it had grown with especial rapidity in Glasgow. The spinners, who were said to number a third of an artisan population of 200,000, could just make ends meet. Weavers' wages were no more than 5s. 6d. a week in 1819. Many families, thrifty and upright (there was no poor relief for the able-bodied in Scotland), were starving. Wages in Manchester and Salford ranged from 6s. to 10s. a week, for a fifteen hours' day. The Yorkshire woollen mianufacture had shrunk by one-fifth in two years. A petition from Coventiy in 1820 represented that it had become customary to use roast wheat instead of tea and boards to barricade windows in preparation for sieges from thou- sands of rebels whose footfall was Ustened for in vain through the darkness " (Harriet Martineau, History of (he Peace, i. 319). 122 MODERN ENGLAND [chap, ii, coffee, and prayed for protection from the excise ofificers. At the end of the year, there was some improvement, especially in the cotton trade. But the agricultural outlook was as black as ever. Wheat was varying between 60s. and 70s. ; and, though the Corn Law had conspicuously failed to prevent a fre- quent and acute fluctuation of prices, the most vocal demand of the farmer was still for more protection. Amid much puzzlement over these disturbing phenomena, one conviction was rising clearly and strongly in the mind of the more enlightened states- men : that commerce and production must be liberated from the thousand and one restric- tive laws by which folly and selfish interest had encumbered them. The nature of international exchange was more accurately understood than hitherto ; and Lord Lansdowne, in 1820, could appreciate as well as another Lord Lansdowne in 1913 the mechanism of foreign trade.^ The ^ Liberty of trade, he said, should be the rule, and restriction the exception. There ought to be no prohibitory duties as such. The Navigation Laws should be relaxed ; an entire freedom of transit trade would encourage the warehouse system, and make our ports a depot for foreign nations. He showed the absurdity of the pre- ference to Canadian timber, especially satirizing the argument that the longer voyage gave us the benefit in freights. " If a person were to make an offer to carry all the mails of this country, using twice the number of horses that were at present used, would that be considered as a recommendation of the new proposal ? " Nor could it be said that Russians would not take our manufactures in return for their timber. They took them indirectly, through Germany. " Whatever we received must be paid for in the produce of our land and labour, directly or cirouitously. If better and cheaper materials were imported, both manufacture and shipping would be stimulated" (Hansard for 1820, i. 565). § VI.] FIRST CENSUS TO PETERLOO 123 Commons' Committee then appointed reported that " all restriction on trade, of whatsoever nature, was an evil, only to be justified by some great political expediency ; and, where such expediency was not clear and manifest, the restriction should be removed." A simplification of the hundreds of protective statutes and a relaxation of the Navigation Laws were specifically recommended. Generally, it may be said that, from this time on. Protection rested on vested interest and fear of economic disturbance, not on any accepted theory. In the case of manufactures, which enjoyed an ad valorem tariff privilege of one-third or more, the defence was becoming very weak ; but, as yet, few leading men dared to contemplate the abolition, or even an immediate lowering, of the corn duties. With the tabling of the London, Glasgow, and Manchester petitions, in May 1820, however, the principle of Free Trade was placed effectively before the country. The petition of the London merchants, drawn up by Thomas Tooke, author of the well- known History of Prices, is a political classic, and perhaps the best of all very short statements of the case for Free Trade. Incidentally, we may note the following clauses as an answer to those who have held that the case was ever made by its advocates to depend upon the action of other countries : " That nothing would more tend to counteract the commercial hostility of foreign States than the adoption of a more enlightened and more conciliatory policy on the part of this 124 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. n. country. That although, as a matter of mere diplomacy, it may sometimes answer to hold out the removal of particular prohibitions or high duties as depending upon corresponding concessions by other States in our favour, it does not follow that we should maintain our restrictions in cases where the desired concessions on their part cannot be obtained. Our restrictions would not be the less prejudicial to our own capital and industry because other governments persisted in preserving impo- litic regulations. That, upon the whole, the most liberal would prove to be the most politic course on such occasions." CHAPTER III THE LOWEST DEPTH, 1821-1834 I, Rural England in the 'Twenties The rural life of England between the close of the great war and the Poor Law reform of 1834 was markedly different from that of either the preceding or the succeeding ages. The common lands had gone ; except in the neighbourhood of the new industrial centres, the commoners were now wage- labourers on the land, dependent upon the small share that fell to them of artificially high prices, or upon parish doles. The yeoman-farmers were disappearing under the triple pressure of rent, rates and taxes, and violent fluctuations in the value of their crops. To the superficial observer, the immanence of an agrarian crisis was not evident. The country was cultivated as it had never been before. The great estates of the aristocracy and the lesser demesnes of the business gentry stretched far and wide, with new barns, trim hedges, clean ditches, fat herds at pasture, root-crops that the irrepressible Cobbett, riding by, hailed as parables of political Radicalism,! and waving grain as 1 " Our system of husbandry is happily illustrative of our system of politics. Our lines of movement are fair and straitforward. We destroy all weeds, which, like tax-eaters, do nothing but devour 125 126 MODERN ENGLAND [oha?. m. to which the only doubt was whether there would be a ruinous abundance. This was the golden age of f ox-huntmg and game- preserving, of the hunting parson and the farming parson. On the main turnpike roads, the stage- coach and the gentleman's travelling carriage kept up a mild simmer of excitement ; but, in general, the village was still self-contained and self-sufl&c- ing. Over its three estates — parson, farmers, and labourers — the squire wielded an almost un- questioned sway. Usually, we may believe, it was a good-natured, though rarely an enlightened, despotism. The squire was a man of the past, a relic of the national settlement of a century earlier, untroubled about religion now that Popery and Puritanism were equally impossible, confirmed in his Tory instincts by youthful memories of the Paris Terrorists and Napoleon. The Oligarchy needed him, and he felt some glory reflected into his corner of the shires from the London salons and clubs. Great as the difference might be in wealth and power, he rightly felt himself to be nearer in essentials to the Duke, and even to " the King, God bless him!" than to the illiterate and de- moralized creatures who cowered in the shadow the sustenance that ought to feed the valuable plants. Our nations of swedes and cabbages present a happy uniformity of enjoyments and of bulk, and not, as in the broad-oast system of Corruption, here and there one of enormous size, surrounded by thousands of poor, little starveKng things. The Norfolk boys are, therefore, nght m calling their swedes Sadical swedes" (Sural Bides, i. § I.] TllE LOWES* DEP^a Hi of Hall and Park. His utmost adventure would be a small imitation of lordly experiments in high farming ; but there were liberal squires here and there who would try to catch something of the easy, common-sensible temper that distinguished the protagonists at Westminster, from Walpole to Palmerston. Bluff, hale, and hearty, the squire thought better of rats than poachers ; he hated, because he simply could not comprehend, any show of manly independence in the " common people." But he lived and died among his folk ; he was not tainted with the love of wealth as such ; he thought the greatness of England still depended upon the patriarchate of his own diminishing class. Pro- bably he viewed as suspiciously as roaring Cobbett himself the mansions and lodges and suburban houses of the " Squires of 'Change Alley." The country parson, thanks to the Corn Laws, was considerably risen from the lowly estate of Gold- smith's Dr Primrose. A gentleman, a magistrate, and the squire's boon companion, his position was virtually recognized even by the Nonconformists, until the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts in 1828, and the removal of Roman Catholic disabilities in the following year, made a semb* lance of equality among Christian preachers. The semblance has never become a reality on the English countryside ; and, in those days, tithe was a burden for which there was rarely any sort of compensation. When enclosure had its full effect, and rural depopulation began, the parson often 128 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. ni. became an absentee tithe-collector.^ In August- September 1826, Cobbett, on one of his rides through Wiltshire, looked down from a hill by Heytesbury into Somerset. " In looking down this vale," he wrote, " one cannot help being struck with the innumerable proofs of a decline in point of population. There are twenty-four parishes, each of which takes a little strip across the valley, and I'uns up through the arable land into the down. There are twenty-four parish churches, and there ought to be as many parsonage-houses ; but seven of these are stated to be unfit for a person to reside in. Two are gone ; there are no parsonage-houses in those two parishes ; there are the sites ; there are the glebes ; the tithes remain, and the parson sacks the amount of them. The falling down and beggary of these parsonage-houses prove beyond all question the decayed state of the population. . . . Twenty-one of the twenty-four parishes have only 4170 souls, men, women, and children. What, I ask for about the thousandth time, what were these twenty churches built for? Some of them stand within a quarter of a mile of each othei'. They are pretty near as close to each other as the churches in London and Westminster are. ... As to the produce of this valley, it must be at least ten times as great as its consumption, even if we include the three towns that belong to it. I am sure I 1 There was a certain Prebendary of Winchester who held two rectories in Kent and an advowson in Devonsliire. One set of liis parishioners became anxious as to his whereabouts, and advertised ; it was then found that he had for some time been living in Rome. § I.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 129 saw produce enough in five or six of the farm-yards, or rick-yards, to feed the whole of the population of the twenty-one parishes. But the infernal system causes it all to be carried away. Not a bit of good beef, or mutton, or veal, and scarcely a bit of bacon is left for those who raise all this food and wool. The labourers here look as if they were half- starved." 1 The farmer is the least sympathetic figure of them all. Twenty years of agricultural speculation had sapped the rough manliness of the type, pro- ducing a divorce of classes which proved in the end to be as injurious to the middlemen as to those beneath. War prices and protective duties had yielded a margin of parasitic profit, the most of which went to the landlord ; but enough was left to the farmer to encourage expectations, ambitions, and habits that were foredoomed to a bitter punish- ment. For, as his most powerful critic said : " The gay farm-houses with pianos within were not improvements. The puUing-down of 200,000 small farm-houses, and making the inhabitants paupers, was not an improvement. The gutting of the cot- tages of their clocks, and brass kettles, and brew- ing-tackle was no improvement." Above all, the reduction in the number of labourers, their wages, and the length of their hiring (now never more than eleven months — lest a " settlement " should be produced) was not the way in which the rural problem could be solved ; and the system of poor » Rides, ii. 66-70. I 130 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. hi. allowances, which had been originally chosen as a means of evading the obligation to pay a living wage, was now, in the dark days of the long peace, an insupportable burden. Market-day in the county town did not suggest any such gloomy reflections as these. Through the length of the main street, a jolly bustle broke the six-days' sleep. In the low, crowded shops, the ladies of squire and parson were laying in the week's supplies of grocery, chandlery, drapery, and quack medicine. The cobbled streets rattled with the wheels of private carriages bearing glorious crests ; and postboys tootled the arrival of the " Express " coach from the nearest city. Now shone the merry countenances of mine host of the George, the Bell, or the Swan, and of his buxom spouse, famed artist of sirloin and pasties. Sons and daughters, stableboys and maids — every hand is busy in the kitchen, or around the overflowing board. In the evening, there may be a County Ball or a Hunt dinner ; and then the ladies will share the fun. Thus the gentry kept up their spirits. They called it " keeping up the County." Once their complacency was broken, as by a volcanic eruption. The Jacquerie of the autumn of 1830 is much more significant than the town riots, following the rejection of the Reform Bill, by which it has been somewhat overshadowed. It began in Kent, perhaps provoked by an importation of Irish labourers, more certainly by the supersession of hand labour by threshing-machines. The first § I.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 131 symptom of trouble was the delivery of threaten- ing letters signed " Swing " ; then stacks were burned, and threshing-machines broken. The fever of incendiarism spread rapidly. Within two or three weeks, mobs of labourers were scouring the county, levying food, and demanding of the farmers a wage of 2s. 6d. a day. In November, the movement extended into Sussex. Except as a precedent, " the conduct of the peasantry," said the Times, " has been admirable. Each parish has, generally speaking, risen -per se ; in many places, their proceedings have been managed with astonish- ing coolness and regularity. . . . Where disorder has occurred, it has arisen from dislike of some obnoxious clergyman, or tithe-man, or assistant- overseer. The farmers universally agreed to their demands." ^ They were, indeed, to some extent sympathetic, as were other classes. There was considerable difficulty in recruiting special con- stables and yeomanry ; the troops were fully occu- pied in the large towns, and could not easily be moved from place to place, even when they could be spared. Thus, the landlords, isolated and help- less, bowed before the storm. Deputations, some- times headed by a Nonconformist minister, waited ^ In The Village. Labourer, Mr and Mrs Hammond suggest that the success of the rising in Kent and Sussex was " due partly, no doubt, to the fact that smuggling was still a common practice in those counties, and that the agricultural labourers thus found their natural leaders." It is possible, also, that an infection may have been brought from Ireland, where the peasantry were familiar with every expedient of agrarian revolt. 132 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. m. upon them, and they promised to give what was asked. Village meetings were held, at which scales of wages were fixed by agreement. By the end of November, Berkshire, Hampshire, and Wiltshire were afoot. Large mobs of labourers, often accom- panied by small farmers, went about levying contributions from householders, demanding a wage of two shillings a day, and, if refused, destroy- ing the threshing-machines. Two workhouses, those of Selborne and Headley, whose draconian regime was notorious, were burned down. When the South Midland counties, from Gloucester to Northampton and Buckingham, became affected, and the mysterious " Swing " joined hands with the equally unknown " Captain Ludd," the Government took fright. Troops were moved into the disturbed districts ; magistrates were assured of support in any coercive step they could take. Lord Melbourne issued a circular forbidding the fixing of wages ; every kind of meet- ing was prohibited. The movement collapsed as rapidly as it had arisen. Eight hundred men were tried, and many were capitally convicted. Only four were actually executed ; hundreds of others were transported or imprisoned. London recovered from its panic in time to enjoy the Christmas festivities ; but a plain word of the Times must have remained in some minds : " Let the rich be taught that Providence will not suffer them to oppress their fellow-creatures with impunity." § 11.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 133 II. Degradation of the Labourer " Oppress ? " Mere poverty, even the extremest, does not justify this hard word. But the Times and the Reformers were right : rural England lay under an oppression, deliberate and systematic, debasing to body and mind, and had so lain for thirty-flve years when the Southern labourers made their last wild fight for justice. No system of oppression is quite as simple as it seems ; and this had several contributory elements — the Corn Law, which forbade cheap food to the poor ; the Combina- tion Laws, which forbade them to unite for the protection of their only property ; the Enclosure Laws, which had made them serfs on their fathers' lands, and other works of the borough-mongers' Parhament which, with eyes blind and ears deaf to their misery, enacted such iniquities as these. But beyond all in importance was the system, the foundation of which we have traced to the Pelican Inn, Speenhamland, of substituting parish doles for a living wage. The system had become greatly elaborated when it was finally exposed and denounced by the famous Poor Law Commission of 1834 ; and we shall de- scribe it as it then stood, with the aid of the Report of the Commission, one of the most remarkable of all British State documents. Most summaries and commentaries upon it written at the time, or in the following half-century of laisser-faire liberalism. MODERN ENGLAND [chap, nu 134 ;.,^ii<,tice to its authors 1 by leaving the im- do an injustice ^^.^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^ p^^^ ^^_^ ^^ r-TaTgSous Uberality/' a " loose administration," d that the English labourer was a naturally depraved being who was, in some mysterious way, enabled during the first third of the nineteenth century to exploit the unfortunate ratepayer with the aid of tender-hearted magistrates. This is a caricature of history. Without idealizing the labourer, or defaming the other and more power- ful parties to any social arrangement of that time, mere probability would indicate, and the Report clearly proves, a very different balance of responsibilities. This, briefly, was the Poor Law System forty years after the first establishment of allowances in aid, or in lieu, of wages. Relief was given both in kind and in money. In the former case, the subsidy generally took the form of exemption from rates, or payment of rent out of the parish fund. Food and clothes were also given. But money payments were more common ; and the Report describes five varieties of allowance which were found to be in operation ; 1, relief without labour ; 2, the " allowance " method proper ; 3, the " roundsmen " method ; 4, parish employ- ment ; and, 5, the "labour-rate" method. In the first of these cases, the family received a daily ^ They were the Bishops of London (Blomeold) and Chester, and ^wl- w ?f ' .*°"™^' ^''""''" W. Senior, Henry Bishop. Henry Uawler, W. Conlson. James TraiU, and Edwin Chadvrfok. § n.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 135 or weekly sum, so long as they were in need. Some- times a small bribe was given to induce them to remove to another parish. It was " more usual to give a rather larger weekly sum, and to force the applicants to give up a certain portion of their time by confining them in a gravel-pit, or in some other enclosure, or directing them to sit at a certain spot, and do nothing." The second case is the original Speenhamland method of grants in aid of wages. In some places, it was resorted to only occasionally. Elsewhere, it was systematic, " forming the law of a whole district, sanctioned and enforced by the magistrates, and promulgated in the form of local statutes under the name of scales." The base of calculation was the price of bread — ^thus, a single woman received from the parish the price of three quartern loaves per week ; a man, his wife, and three children, the price of eleven loaves per week. Ad- ditions were made in case of sickness or other special kind of distress. The Chelmsford scale was based on the price of flour per peck ; and, as this varied from Is. 6d. to 7s., the family " make-up " or "bread-money " varied from 9s. 4d. to £l, lis. 4d. a week. It will be seen that the invitation to fraud was flagrant, and not less so the invitation to large families, legitimate or other, for " the birth of a child endows the parent with an allowance, what- ever his income." Theoretically, the allowance was reduced according to the ascertained earnings of the applicant. All the more reason why the earnings should not be ascertained. " Many of those who 136 MODERN ENGLAND [chap* m. at particular periods of the year receive wages far exceeding the average amount of the earnings of the most industrious labourer, receive also large allow- ances from the parish. The third variety of reUef, the "roundsmen" system, consisted in "the parish paying the occupiers of property to employ the ap- plicants for relief at a rate of wages fixed by the parish, and depending not on the services, but on the wants, of the applicants, the employer being repaid out of the poor rate all that he advances in wages beyond a certain sum. This is the house row, or roundsmen, or billet, or ticket, or stem system." That is, the pauper was hired to the farmer at a price, and thedifference between this price and the scalewas made up by the parish. In some places, there were regular weekly auctions of unemployed paupers ^— the nearest approach modem England has made to the slave trade. Relief by parish employment, the fourth variety, was very unusual, only accounting in 1832 for £854,000 of a total poor relief expen- diture of over seven million pounds. The reason is obvious. Not only did the demoralized men object -to steady, organized labour. Not only was there no staff equal to the task of organization. As the Commissioners plainly say : " Parish employment does not afford direct profit to any individual. Under most of the other systems of relief, the imme- diate employers of labour can throw on the parish a First Report of the Commissionera for inquiring into the Administra- tion and Operation of the Poor Laws in 1834. Reprint, 1885. P.P. 347, p. 20. § n.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 137 part of the wages of their labourers. They prefer, therefore, those modes of relief out of which they can extract profit under the mask of charity," Finally, there was the " labour-rate " system, con- sisting in " an agreement among the ratepayers that each of them shall employ and pay out of his own money a certain number of the labourers who have settlements in the parish, in proportion not to his real demand for labour, but according to his rental, or his contribution to the rates, or the number of horses that he keeps for tillage, or the num.ber of acres he occupies, or according to some other scale." Upon the relations of the Poor Law to the helpless, we need not dwell at any length. Outdoor relief of the impotent, a subject of anxiety for strict administrators at a later date, had not then given rise to any very considerable abuse. The workhouse was badly governed ; lunatics,^ invalids, prostitutes, and children were herded promiscuously ; and it is evident that the genuine poor must have suffered by the drain of funds in allowances to the able- bodied. The practice of adding to the widow's pension an addition for her children, and generally a larger addition if they were illegitimate, was de- nounced as inviting inimorality and idleness. But the Commissioners reported that " the allowances to the aged and infirm are moderate." The substantial evil was not, then, the loose, ' An Act was passed in 1828, the first ol the kind, to provide for the care of pauper lunatics. 138 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. m. sentimental charity which it is the aim of instructed philanthropists to-day to repress. It was some- thing very different, very much less innocent, something it is only possible to understand if we keep in mind the course of events traced in the preceding chapters. We saw that the " Speenham- land policy" had a negative and a positive side. The minimum wage demanded by the more intellir gent labourers was refused. Doles were established instead, not out of any overflowing generosity, but because the people — ^their common rights lost for ever, and their village industries ruined — ^were at starvation point, and they must have some trifling share in the system of loot known as the Corn Laws. But why were " allowances " maintained so long ? Why were abuses tolerated under which poor relief cost over seven millions sterling in 1832, nearly as much as inl818, when the reaction after the great war led to the extremest distress ? There is no doubt about the oppressiveness of the rates. An extreme case is cited of a parish in Bucks, where they rose from £10 in 1801 to £99 in 1816, and £367 in 1832, when they " suddenly ceased in consequence of the impossibility of continuing their collection, the landlords having given up their rents, the farmers their tenancies, and the clergyman his glebe and tithes." The good parson, in fact, proposed — strange idea ! — ^that the land should be handed over to the able-bodied paupers, who, within two years, he believed, " would be able and willing to support themselves." In many districts, farms § n.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 139 were left tenantless because the rate could not be paid. Sometimes, the small ratepayer was in a position actually less favourable than that of the subsidized pauper. The whole system put a pre- mium upon fraud, perjury, and vicious idleness. And still it was maintained — not by the votes of the men, who had none, but by their masters. A Committee of the House of Commons in 1817 pointed out the gathering evil ; and, by 59 Geo. Ill, c. 12, the power of the magistrate to order relief was somewhat restricted, and the removal of Irish and Scottish paupers, the appointment of repre- sentative vestries and paid assistant-overseers, and the rating of the owners of small tenements were authorized. The assessment diminished down to 1824^the year when peaceful combinations to raise wages were first allowed. Then it began to rise again ; and, ten years later, the situation was so grave that reform was unavoidable. Without doubt, the degradation of the labourer had become widespread by this time. How could it be other- wise ? A pauper, said the Commissioners, " has all a slave's security for subsistence, without his liability to punishment. As a single man, indeed, his income does not exceed a bare subsistence ; but he has only to marry, and it increases. Even then, it is unequal to the support of a family ; but it rises on the birth of every child. If his family is numerous, the parish becomes his principal paymaster. A man with a wife and six children, entitled according to the scale to have his wages 140 MODERN ENGLAND [chaS. irr. made up to 16s. a week, in a parish where the wages paid by individuals do not exceed 10s. or 12s., is almost an irresponsible being. All the other classes of society are exposed to the vicissitudes of hope and fear ; he alone has nothing to lose or to gain. . . . Can we wonder if the uneducated are seduced into approving a system which aims its allurements at all the weakest parts of their nature, which offers marriage to the young, security to the anxious, ease to the lazy, and impunity to the profligate ? " i There is evidence that this profhgacy was some- times confused with what we should now consider legitimate attempts at political agitation ; while it sometimes led to riot and a kind of outrage better known in Ireland under the name of " moon- lighting." The Commissioners speak of popular discontent in that terrible period being everywhere based upon a belief that all men had a right to a subsistence — ^it was, indeed, a belief grounded, not in the doctrine of the Chartists or the French Revolution, but in the ancient law and custom of the land, only recently discarded. In this connec- tion, several significant references are made to the agrarian riots of 1830. " The violence of most of the mobs seems to have arisen from the idea that all their privations arose from the cupidity or fraud of those entrusted with the management of the fund provided for the poor. . . . Wherever the objects of expectation have been made definite, ' Report, p. 37. § II.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 141 where wages upon the performance of work have been substituted for eleemosynary aid, and those wages have been allowed to remain matter of contract, employment has again produced content, and kindness become again a source of gratitude." And, referring to crime in 1830 : " Partly under the application of force, but much more under that of bribes, that paroxysm subsided ; but what must be the state of mind of those who have to calculate every winter whether they may expect to be the victims of its return ? What would each resident in a disturbed district then have given to have saved to himself and his family not merely the actual expense, but the anxiety, of that unhappy period ? " Perhaps this appeal to fear exaggerated the facts. At the darkest moment in the darkest period of the history of England, there was no reason why the governing class should stand in awe of the poor labourers of the countryside — ^until they had votes, and freedom of movement and combina- tion. At present, they had neither land, nor money, nor arms ; they were forbidden to combine ; they could not even move from their parish in search of work without losing their " settlement," the claim upon relief which might be their only escape from starvation ; they lost harvesting and other extra opportunities to Irish immigrants on this account. The sturdiest of them were drifting into the slums of the manufacturing towns, whither we shall presently follow them- What power of intimida- 142 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. m. tion was left in the ever feebler remnant of the village where Wellington's soldiers were born, ill- fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, uneducated, and now hopeless and degraded ? Yet some fear there was, and well might be. Of this the evidence leaves no possibility of doubt — ^the report of the Poor Law Conamission alone suffices to establish it : the effective cause of the ruin of the English labourer was the rank, obstinate, and widespread selfishness of the land- holding class and their dependants. Mr and Mrs Hammond say of the process of enclosiire what I should rather say of the systematic refusal of a living wage which followed, that " the governing class killed by this policy the spirit of a race." Any such disruption must work immeasurable havoc ; and, while the ablest economists have been belied by time, the passage of generations has but empha- sised the truth of the poet's warning that the destruction of " A bold peasantry, their country's pride," must be an irreparable loss to the nation.^ ' Even in 1775, Goldsmith saw to the heart of the matter. It may be recalled that. In The Deserted Village, he sings the sad fate of the emigrant, and refers pointedly to robbery by enolosuie : " Where, then, ah ! where shall poverty reside. To 'scape the pressure of contiguous pride ? If, to some common's fenceless limits stray'd, He drives his flock to pick the scanty blade. Those fenceless fields the sons of wealth divide, And even the bare- worn common is deny'd. If to the city sped — ^what waits him there f To see profusion that he must not share. To see ten thousand baneful arts combin'd To pamper luxury, and thin mankind." § n.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 143 It is conceivable that, had agriculture been re- settled upon a base of wage-labour, and rested on it exclusively as manufacture has done, the rural labourer might have climbed up to the light like the artisan in the towns. Base influences, conscious and unconscious, personal and of wider range, forbade it. " The great source of Poor Law mal- administration," say the Commissioners, "is the desire of many of those who regulate the distribu- tion of the parish fund to extract from it a profit to themselves." Thus, " the employers of paupers are attached to a system which enables them to dismiss and resume their labourers according to their daily, or even hourly, want of them, to reduce wages to the minimum, or even below the minimum, of what will support an unmarried man, and to throw upon others the payment of a part, frequently the greater part, and sometimes almost the whole, of the wages actually received by their labourers. • . . High rates, too, are a ground for demanding an abatement from rent ; high wages are not." The practice was highly infectious, very few farmers having the intelligence or courage to anticipate recent conclusions as to the " economy of good wages." Even when the farmer, being the owner of his land, had an interest in keeping the rates down, " he may be interested in introducing the allowance system into the neighbouring parishes, if he can manage, by pulling down cottages or other expedients, to keep down the number of persons having ' settlements ' in his own parish. 144 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. in. Several instances have been mentioned to us of parishes nearly depopulated, in which almost all the labour is performed by persons settled in the neighbouring villages or towns, drawing from them as allowances the greater part of their subsistence, receiving from their employer not more than half- wages even in summer, and much less in winter, and discharged whenever their services are not wanted." Most landlords, in fact, " seem to have acquired habits of thinking and feeling and acting which unfit them to originate any real or extensive amendment." Of the lesser interests involved, the owner of jerry-built cottages who found in the parish a generous and safe tenant, the petty shop- keeper and publican who attended the vestries to vote allowances to their customers and debtors, the officials who winked at jobbery and fraud, we need say nothing. It is not to be supposed that these evils were universal in rural England. On the other hand, they were not limited altogether to the countryside. " In towns," the Commissioners say, " the allowance system prevails less, probably because the manu- facturing capitalists form a small proportion of the ratepayers, and consequently have less influence in the vestries, than the farmers in country places. But even in the towns it exists to a very formidable degree." Here, as in the country, the small shop- keeper might gain more from dole-receivers than he lost as ratepayer ; and the owner of small cottage property might obtain parish tenants, and § n.] THE LOWEST? DEPTH 14S be exempted from poor-rate. As to the lower grades of manufacture, the Commissioners say : " The object of machinery is to diminish the want not only of physical, but of moral and intellectual qualities on the part of the workman. Judgment and intelligence are not required for processes which can be performed only in one mode. Honesty is not necessary where all the property is under one roof or in one enclosure, and where it is difficult of sale. Under such circumstances, it is not found that parish assistance necessarily destroys the efficiency of the manufacturing labourer. Where that assistance makes only a part of his income and the remainder is derived from piece-work, his employer insists, and sometimes successfully, that he shall not earn that remainder but by the greatest exertion. (Unlike the farmer) the manufacturer who can induce or force others to pay part of the wages of his labourers actually may be a pure gainer by it ; he really can obtain cheap labour " — of course, at the cost of other manufacturers, other owners of rateable property, and of unmarried labourers. This argument is illustrated by cases from the Leicestershire hosiery trade, ribbon- weav- ing in the villages round Coventry, the small workshops in Birmingham, the cloth trade in Devonshire, and the Nottinghamshire stocking manufacture. The Commissioners were not required to pursue the subject further than this. They could not foresee that, with two and a half times the popula- K 146 MODEliN ENGLANt) [chap. hi. tion in 1901, agriculture would maintain only about the same numiber of persons as in 1831, and a consider- ably smaller number of labourers.^ It is possible, however, that the indirect effects of village pauperiz- ation have been as grave as its direct results. The wage of every man affects the wage of every other man, and the " man at the margin " especially influences the whole process. The effect upon wages at the docks, for instance, of a new influx of unskilled labour, as after the Irish famines, is very evident. It is less often realized that the removal of an element of stability in the lowest wage-strata weakens the whole structure, that the degradation of the humblest clophopper radiates, as it were, a wave of degradation to the highest level in the world of industry. In no other way can the low- ness of wages in many departments of maniifacture be accounted for. These businesses represent, as compared with earlier methods of production, enor- mous economies. It can be statistically demon- strated that the reward of capital has increased much more considerably than the reward of labour ; doubtless, the consumer has also gained very largely. Labour in industry has been affected 1 1831. {England and Wales.) 1901. Population . . 13,897,187 Population . . 32,678,213 In agriculture . . 1,103,758 Including — Farmers andrelatives (about) 310,000 Nurserymen, etc. (about) . . 125,000 ■ Agric.labourers(about) 612,000 Occupied in agriculture . 1,075,912 Including — Occupiers employing labom-ers 1 161,188 Occupiers not employ- ing labouieis 113,849 Agrio. labourers 799,875 •I m.] teE LOWfiST^ DEPTH 1^ adversely in relation to the other factors by the large increase of population, and by the competition of nations on a lower with those on a higher level ; but a more potent influence throughout Western Europe in the nineteenth century has been the severance of the country-folk from the soil, their desperate flight to the towns, and their mad destruc- tion of one another in the struggle for bread.^ In England, this thing need never have happened. For more than half a century, British manufacturers had nothing to fear from foreign competition. Prodigious profits were made ; and the natural increase of population could be easily absorbed. Yet the almost miraculous economies of machine- production are only microscopically reflected in the wages even of skilled artisans ; and in the lower levels hunger is always a next-door neighbour. The largest single agent in this melancholy result of a century's invention and toil is rural demoraliza- tion and the unceasing rural exodus. III. Un-Natubal Histoky of the Slum The outcasts created the Slum, the worst of the disease marks of laisser-faire industrialism. The disease varies somewhat ; but there is a norm most readily to be found, perhaps, in some of the lesser Lancashire factory centres. The town was once a sleepy community built around a small market- 1 Arnold Toynbee remarks, however, that "the efficiency of English manufacturing labour is largely due to the very fact that it is not able to shift on to the land " (Industrial Revolution, p. 103). 148 MODERN ENGLAND [ohap. m. place, on a small river, surrounded by green fields and moorlands. Immigration, due to enclosure and high farming, had gone on slowly before the substitution of steam for water-power brought the factory in from the lone hillside. Henceforth, there is a ceaseless demand for workmen's cottages ; and, the movement of aggregation being driven by necessity, not choice, they are thrown up hap- hazard, as rapidly and cheaply, and as near to the factory, as possible. Water-supply, exigencies of transport, and other considerations — among which the proximity of the workers' ghetto, the labour market, comes to be one of the most important — lead to the concentration of factories within the same small area. The town grows, and grows. A rather larger type of cottage is built, with cellars which can be sub-let to the less fortunate late-comers. There is now no pretence whatever of a " garden " ; and the " yard," if not literally measured, contains a very limited number of feet. Gaps in the grimy rows of houses are filled up, what had once been open courts and tiny squares being closed to sun and air, save for covered entries. The spaces are further abbreviated; then the narrow lanes be- tween them disappear, and we have a region of back-to-back cottages, many already decayed, all poorly built, badly supplied with water, ill- drained or undrained, a ready nursery for epidemic disease. In larger towns, there is this variation — the building of factories, markets, docks, and rail- § m.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 149 way termini makes a central residence in time less desirable for the merchant class. As they move out after fresh air, the helots seize upon their discarded mansions, divide them up into one- room or two-room tenements, and " pig " there, until dilapidation can no further go. Writing in 1844, Friedrich Engels, in his Condition of the Working Class, describes a walk through the old tOAvn of Manchester : " Going from the Old Church to Long Millgate, the stroller has at once a row of old-fashioned houses at the right, of which not one has kept its original level ; these are remnants of pre-manufacturing Manchester, whose former inhabitants have left the houses, which were not good enough for them, to a population strongly mixed mth Irish blood. Here one is in an almost undisguised worldng-men's quarter, for even the shops and beer-houses hardly take the trouble to exhibit a trifling degree of cleanliness. But this is nothing in comparison with the courts and lanes which lie behind." The view from Ducie Bridge he thus describes : — "At the bottom flows, or rather stagnates, the Irk, a narrow, coal-black, foul-smelling stream, full of debris and refuse, which it deposits on the shallower right bank. In dry weather, a long stream of disgusting, blackish-green slime pools are left standing on this bank, from the depths of which bubbles of miasmatic gas constantly arise, and give forth a stench unendurable even on the bridge forty or fifty feet above the surface of the stream. Above the bridge are tanneries, bonemills, and gasworks, from which all drains and refuse find their way into the Irk, which 150 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. in. receives further the contents of all the neighbouring sewers and privies. Below the bridge, you look upon the piles of debris, the refuse, filth, and ofial from the courts on the steep left bank ; here each house is packed close behind its neighbour, and a piece of each is visible, aU black, smoky, crumbling, ancient, with broken panes and window frames. The background is furnished by old barrack-like factory buildings. On the lower right bank stands a long row of houses and mills ; the second house being a ruin without a roof, piled with debris ; the third stands so low that the lowest floor is uninhabitable, and therefore without windows or doors. Here the background embraces the pauper burial-ground, the station of the Liverpool and Leeds railway, and, in the rear of this, the Workhouse, which, like a citadel, looks threateningly down, from behind its high walls and parapets on the hiQ-top, upon the working- people's quarter below. " Above Ducie Bridge, the left bank grows more flat and the right bank steeper ; but the condition of the dwellings on both banks grows worse rather than better. He who turns to the left here from the main street, Long Millgate, is lost ; he wanders from one court to another, turns countless corners, passes nothing but narrow, filthy nooks and alleys, \mtil after a few minutes he has lost all clue, and knows not whither to turn. Everywhere halt or wholly ruined buildings, some of them actually un- inhabited, which means a great deal here ; rarely a wooden or stone floor to be seen in the houses, almost uniformly broken, ill-fitting windows and doors, and a state of filth ! Everywhere heaps of debris, refuse, and offal ; standing pools for gutters, and a stench which alone would make it impossible for a human being in any degree civilised to live in such a district. The newly-built extension of the Leeds railway, which crosses the Irk here, has swept away § ni.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 151 some of these courts and lanes, laying others completely open to view. Immediately under tte railway bridge there stands a court, the filth and horrors of which surpass all the others by far, just because it was hitherto so shut off, so secluded that the way to it could not be found without -a good deal of trouble. I should never have discovered it myself, without the breaks made by the railway, though I thought I knew this whole region thoroughly. Passing along a rough bank, among stakes and washing-lines, one penetrates into this chaos of small, one-storied, one-roomed huts, in most of which there is no artificial floor ; kitchen, living and sleeping room all in one. In such a hole, scarcely five feet long by six broad, I found two beds — and such bedsteads and beds ! — which, with a staircase and chimney- plaoe, exactly fiUed the room. In several others I found absolutely nothing, while the door stood open, and the inhabitants leaned agaiast it. Everywhere before the doors refuse and ofial ; that any sort of pavement lay underneath could not be seen but only felt, here and there, with the feet. This whole collection of cattle-sheds for human beiags was surrounded, on two sides by houses and a factory^ and on the third by the river, and beside the narrow stair up the bank, a narrow doorway alone led out into another almost equally iU-buUt, Hl-kept labyrinth of dweUiags." Throughout industrial England such object- lessons in discontent met the eye ; and we may guess how provocatively they worked in the mind of Karl Marx, vividly conveyed by his friend Engels, and confirmed by Marx's own experiences in London. This scene from old Manchester is, doubtless, an exceptionally black picture, although it would be easy to multiply illustrations as grievous, and it may be noted that, in the last twenty years 152 MODERN ENGLAND [chap, hi, of the century, there still remained in Manchester ten thousand back-to-back houses which had to b6 closed by public authority as unfit for human habitation. There are many factors in the creation of slums other than the normal and general one of concentrated industry in an unregulated commu- nity. Individual weakness and vice weigh heavily on both sides of the account : the ignorance, shift- lessnesis, and viciousness of the more degraded class of workfolk, for these are attracted to the city as well as the honest and vigorous ; the greed of rack-renting landlords and usurious money- lenders ; the indifference of Bumble and the well- to-do in general. But it is probably a safe rule to minimize all such individual faults when we find ourselves faced by a force of almost universal validity, especially when the weaknesses of the individuals appear to be very largely the fruit of this larger influence. There is abundant evidence to show that a very great part, perhaps the majority, of the working class in the large ports, factory towns, and cities lived, during the first half of the nineteenth century, in conditions of squalor and misery, and that, during that period, they received little help either from the Government or the municipalities, and not much more from private philanthropists, towards the betterment of their wretched homes. The case of London presents some special features, apart from sheer magnitude, which distinguish it from that of the northern factory towns. The § in.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 153 Metropolis was no mushroom creation of modern industry and commerce, but a growth of long centuries, proud and prosperous ages during which the city held its own against the encroaching power of the boldest national sovereigns, a veritable City-State, standing out from among the miscellany of mere towns and counties by virtue of its' wealth, strength, and self-confidence, its dominating traditions and firmly held privileges. The city government was not, at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, as efficient as it had been ; but it spoke for the most substantial body of British citizens, and not seldom it could intervene effectually in their defence. London has had slums for centuries. In the middle of the eighteenth cen- tury, grave disorders were already giving anxiety to enlightened magistrates like Sir John Fielding ; at the beginning of the nineteenth century, the population was larger than that which to-day taxes the abilities of the city councils of Manchester or Glasgow, with all the resources of modern science at their control. Yet the City Fathers might have risen to their task had it evolved normally. The pressure of the great war, the rise of London as a port, and an unceasing flood of poor immigrants created a complex of problems beyond their wit to control, or even to comprehend. As competi- tive commercialism grew, and set up its sleeping quarters all over the neighbouring hills, the old civic and communal spirit faded away, and with it the old governing capacity. 154 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. hi. The alien elements in London, though never very large in proportion to the whole population, have always been larger and more varied than those of any other British city. They have, perhaps, always justified themselves ultimately by some special contribution to the general life ; but at times they have been a serious disturbing influence, and the gain of variety has been commonly offset by a loss of social unity. The difficulties of the factory town, the port, the market-town — each on a vast scale, and with a diversity unequalled else- where — are here combined with the concentration of wealth and intelligence due to a national capital. The reasons for the trend of poverty to an East End and wealth to a West End are evident. The distinction is, however, far from being absolute ; there have been, and still are, slums, with somewhat different features, at either point of the compass. The relief, periodically necessary, of congestion in the centre has too often meant only the transference of the evil to a jerry-built suburb. The main stream of traffic has always run parallel with the river, from the Port in the east to West- minster and the residential districts in the west. With the establishment of railway communications, northward and southward traffic was much stimu- lated. Even in the time of the Great Fire, the in- adequacy of the main arteries was felt ; and the rejection of the plans of Sir Christopher Wren and Sir John Evelyn for the reconstruction of the City must be regarded as an historical calamity. Ever § ni.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 155 since, the wealthier classes have moved outward, stage by stage, followed by a swarm of poorer folk who occupied their abandoned districts. It was thus, for instance, that Soho, once a centre of fashion, became a chief settlement of poor aliens in the Metropolis. Wherever poverty obstructed the main course of traffic, or jostled too flagrantly with wealth, there was some hope of public improve- ment. In the backwaters, and in the outlying regions, slums grew up without interference. Engels quotes some pitiful instances. Of 5366 families numbering 26,830 persons, living in the Drury Lane region in 1840, three-fifths had but one room per family, and yet paid rents (4s 6d. for a second-story room, 8s. for a garret) amounting to a total of £40,000. In the aristocratic parish of St George, Hanover Square, a thousand families had but one room apiece. In Bethnal Green, at the same time, according to the Rev. G. Alston, there were 1400 houses in a space of less than four hundred yards square, and they contained 2795 families of about 12,000 persons. " It is nothing unusual to find a man, his wife, four or five children, and sometimes both grandparents, all in one single room, where they eat, sleep, and work. I believe that, before the Bishop of London called attention to this most poverty-stricken parish, people at the West End knew as little of it as of the savages of Australia or the South Sea Isles." The Times thundered against these scandals. " Let all men remember this," it^cried in 1843, " that within the most 156 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. m. courtly precincts of the richest city of God's earth, there may be found, night after night, winter after winter, women, young in years, old in sin and suffering, outcasts from society, rotting from famine, filth, and disease. Let them remember this, and learn not to theorise, but to act," There had been ten Select Conamittees between 1798 and 1821 to report on particular improvements (the Port, the rebuilding of London Bridge, the approaches to the Parliament Houses, and so on) ; and between 1832 and 1851 about a dozen more Committees were appointed for like purposes. But the work was dependent upon the revenue from the coal duties ; and, until the Metropolitan Board of Works was set up in 1855, there was no central body to attack the ever-enlarging problem. At that time " districts now connected by broad high- ways were hindered from easy and direct commu- nication with each other by labyrinths of narrow and tortuous streets and lanes." For thirty years the Board of Works continued, the meagre result of its labours being the construction of about 16 miles of thoroughfare at a net cost of £11,517,000, and the re-housing of less than eleven thousand ejected labourers.^ Terrible epidemics of cholera and typhus effected more than Christian Socialist novels. Chartist speeches, and newspaper articles — they made the first breach in the laisser-faire doctrine, and pre- ' London County Council: History of London Street Improvements, 1865-97, by Percy J. Edwards, p. 138. § IV.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 157 sented convincing arguments for a new kind of action. The feeble beginning of national schooling and factory inspection, cheaper and better food under Free Trade, railway communications, im- proved police and other miunicipal services, the rise of a national health service, the invitation of the Colonies — ^these and other indirect agencies wrought a great change. It was slow and partial, because the evil constantly grew at one point while it was being reduced at another. Even at the end of the century, it could not be said that the duty of the nation, represented by the State, in regard to the housing of the people had received more than tentative recognition. The slum is as distinctive a monument of nine- teenth-century industrialism as any other ; and no true history of the British people can be written without giving it prominence. IV. The Radical Reformers When the discredit of the Throne, now occupied by a rake, and presently by a buffoon, had become flagrant, the Oligarchy could not long evade the choice — ^reform or revolution. In such a case, popular tumult does but give the final touch to a process of disintegration. The reign of George IV was full of signs of impending change, of contra- dictory acts eloquent of distracted counsels, and an uneasy sense that to-morrow would be the day of reckoning. The great war was passing into 158 MODEBI* ENdLANB [ohas. nt. history ; the men who sustained it were men of the past, with no comprehension of the new problems and forces. Even to carry on the routine of govern- ment, it was necessary to introduce fresh blood. But the kind of resistance which men like Eldon offered to the rise of Canning, Huskisson, and Peel, shows an infatuation of class-pride most unpromising for a peaceful future. Peel could hardly be treated openly as an adventurer, as the others were, being the son of an immensely wealthy Tory who had received a title for his services, and being, besides, " quiet and modest, never forgetting or concealing the fact of his origin." But, Harriet Martineau adds, " there can be no doubt that, though Mr Peel has managed the fact with all prudence and honesty, and has long risen above the need of any adven- titious advantages, he has felt the awkwardness of being the son of a cotton-spinner innumerable times in the course of his career. There is some- thing in the way of his occasionally referring to the fact which shows this." The reluctance of the old Tories to disfranchize the rotten boroughs, their reckless resort to prosecutions for high treason, sedition, blasphemy, and libel, are less significant than this extremity of self-conceit. Huskisson's admission, as President of the Board of Trade, into the Liverpool Cabinet, in 1823, marks the first preliminary of their surrender. " Really, this is rather too much," quoth Eldon ; but rumours from the London Tavern of the effective starting of a national reform agitation, from the § iv.) d^HE LOWESi: DEp¥h 159 country of Cobbett having got the ear of the dis- contented farmers, from Ireland of rebeUion, famine, and typhus, and from Lancashire of strike riots, were more alarming then anything the Lord Chan- cellor could say. Something must be done. The debt had actually grown by 11 millions since Waterloo, and the interest by £700,000. Three millions of taxes were taken off in 1821 ; and the following three years witnessed a distinct revival of trade and mianufacture. Huskisson at once began the cutting-down of the Navigation Laws, which was only to be completed sixteen years later. The attempt to give British and Colonial ships a monopoly of trade with Asia, Africa, and America, conamenced by Cromwell, had, after the revolt of the American Colonies, led to retaliation, and the absurd spectacle of two nearly related countries sending their ships each to the other in ballast, bringing only return cargoes, and so each doubling its costs of carriage. When this anachronism was ended, after the war of 1814, by a mutual repeal of restrictions, Portugal, Holland, and Prussia de- manded the same reciprocal facilities, on pain of retaliation if refused. At the same time, the in- crease of the Atlantic trade showed how beneficia] a larger measure of freedom must be. Accordingly, in 1822 five Bills were carried relaxing the bonds on foreign commerce ; and on June 6, 1823, Huskis- son introduced his Reciprocity of Duties Bill, by which all duties were to fall equally on all ships, British or foreign, provided that the countries of 160 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. lii. their origin established a like equality. The ship- owners grumbled ; but the measure was quickly justified by the growth of British shipping. Reform petitions were presented this year from the City of London, Norfolk, and Yorkshire — ^the last containing the signatures of 17,000 freeholders, two-thirds of those in the county. Nevertheless, Lord John Russell's reform motion was rejected by a three-to-one majority in the Commons. A relative prosperity and calm continued through 1824 ; and the session was marked by three notable pieces of legislation, repealing the Spitalfields Act, the restrictions on the emigration of artisans, and, most important of all, the combination laws. The Spitalfields episode illustrates the point of view of these early Hberationists, They saw two obstacles to the growth of the silk manufacture. The greater lay in the import duties designed to protect the trade from the competition of French goods of lower price and better design. Thanks to an increased and improved production of raw silk in India, considerable progress had been made of late ; and, in 1823, the value of the manufac- tured stuffs was estimated at 10 millions. The principal silk merchants now petitioned for the removal of the duties on imported materials, oppos- ing, however, any interference with the duties on wrought silk. The second obstruction was the ancient law empowering magistrates to fix for the Spitalfields weavers a living wage — the last relic of a forgotten economic order. Huskisson said he § IV.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 161 could hardly account for the existence of such a statute ; and it is manifest that he could not understand the petition for its maintenance pre- sented by Mr T. Fowell Buxton on behalf of 11,000 jburneymen weavers. The Commons agreed to the repeal by a small majority ; but a stronger survival of paternalism in the Upper House was shown by the adoption of several hostile amendments, and the matter dropped. Amid the excitements of 1825, the repeal was quietly carried, without dis- cussion. Coincidently, the import duties both on raw and manufactured silk were greatly reduced. This approach to Free Trade had both a practical and a theoretical value. It took away an indirect bounty from a small class of capitalists, and brought a health and vigour into the business which pre- sently raised it above fear of competition, and even enabled it to export considerable quantities of silk goods to France. It had an even more important effect in helping to extinguish smuggling, which up to this time had cost the country at least a million a year in loss of revenue and in naval and coast- guard expenses.^ The repeal of the magisterial power to fix wages in East London had less practical than theoretical * But from 1827 to 1843, just before the complete abolition of the duties, half the silk goods imported from France were smuggled. The consequent loss, either to the revenue (as compared with what it would have been had all imports paid duty), or to the consumer ,(if the duty had been lowered enough to prevent smuggling), In these seventeen years, was estimated at £38,618,708. Cj. Hirst's Porter, p. 349. L 162 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. in. significance. The system was already dead ; this was its burial. It marked the complete abandon- ment by the community of any influence upon the remuneration of labour ; and this full proclamation of laisser faire may well have had a moral (or im- moral) effect upon the employing class. For, of two possibilities, one must represent the facts. Either the old magisterial power tended to keep wages up, in which case the weavers were right to defend it, and the employers were only seeking to force them to accept lower wages; or the magis- terial power was in abeyance or was ineffective, in which case the question was only one of principle, and it was untrue to say that " meddling inter- ference under an antiquated statute " was driving the trade into other districts or abroad. The magistrates of the time were not exactly revolu- tionary meddlers, nor were they omnipotent ad- ministrators. We are told that weavers' wages in Spitalfields fell from 17s. a week in 1824 to 9s. in 1829. This suggests that the judicial power had been effective ; but it could not have long remained. In any case, when it was abolished, a class of justices who had been used to exercise a sort of arbitral function between employers and em.ployed came to an end; and a new magistracy exercising little power except that of punishment arose. The weavers now knew the worst. Human labour was to be bought like horse labour, or steam-power, or any other commodity, as cheaply as possible. Ten years later, the silk trade had transferred itself to § IV.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 163 the North ; and, of 30,000 operatives who had " freely contracted " themselves into the service of 238 mills, one-third were children under thir- teen years of age, mostly girls ; another third were "young persons," mostly girls, under eighteen, and only 4114, were adult men. The manufacture had greatly expanded ; the ladies of the crinoline era co\ild wear two silk dresses where they had only been able to afford one. But what had become of the 11,000 Spitalfields journeymen ? To do the Philosophical Radicals justice, they proceeded at once to an attack upon the laws pro- hibiting labour combinations. We saw in our first chapter that, when the destruction of apprentice- ship and other remains of the gild system began, the creation of trade unionism was inevitable, unless the mass of operatives was to sink into virtual slavery. There was never any suggestion that combinations of masters should be forbidden. When paternalism was abandoned, the men also must be allowed to protect themselves in the only possible way, by union. This development was evferywhere delayed by pathetically futile efforts to recover the meagre defence of legal apprentice- ship and magisterial arbitration. It was power- fully obstructed by the Act of 1799, expressly penalizing all associations — a measure of alarm due in part to the rapid growth of trade unionism in the Lancashire and Yorkshire textile trades — and by the merciless punishment of strike committees. This is the real origin of the conspirative element 164 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. in. which marked the democratic movement of the next generation. Skilled handicraftsmen were not yet numerous enough to be lightly flouted ; but in the textile and other routine trades — where hand- workers, with their old domestic tools, were pitted against the factory machine, and women and children against men — the spirit of greed was unrestrained. Hume and his friends would hardly have been able to manoeuvre through Parliament in 1824 the repeal of the combination laws had it hot been a postulate of their own economic doctrine that neither by combination nor in any other way could labour secure a higher wage than the play of natural forces gave it. Even so, the majority repented of its good deed in the following year ; and, on Huskisson's initiative, the Act was modified so as to penalize association for any but the most peaceful kind of bargaiiiing as to wages and hours of labour. A substantial gain was left, however; and, from this point, trade unionism must be watched as one of the rising powers in the national life. The second great commercial crisis of the century, that of 1825, illustrates the economic principles of which we spoke in connection with the first ; and even more signally does it exhibit the demoralizing consequences upon the more comfortable classes of the loss of a long prevalent social faith, the breakdown of one principle of cohesion in society before another can be established in its stead. The Christian settlement of Western Europe in §!iv.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 165 the later Middle Ages embodied, however crudely, an essential principle of human government. It recognized the all-importance of economic acts and motives ; and, by its faith and its law, it set, or sought to set, bounds upon the lusts of greed and arbitrary power. Although the learned rakes of the Restoration had got men to laugh at the super- stitions of what they called the " Dark Ages," it was a gentle laugh, not yet the leer of awakened avarice. It is not the eighteenth century, but this second decade of the nineteenth — the interval between the fanatical careers of Joanna Southcott and Edward Irving, the day of the bodysnatchers and the treadmill — that witnesses the eclipse of faith, and all of morals that rests on faith, in England. What would More and Erasmus have said to a prophecy that, in three centuries, the humanism of the Reformation would have degene- rated into a doctrine that reformers should rest content while men amd women, boys and girls, are being bought in the market-place like pigs of iron or bales of cotton ? Let us stomach the un- comfortable truth that, as the days of persecution are those of deepest conviction, so the men who too easily flatter themselves upon their enlightenment and (liberalism may be ministering to license and abetting tyranny. In the Tory factory reformers and Radical Corn Law abolitionists, the twentieth- century student finds a strange confusion of tongues. The Individualists of the Chair did, indeed, reach a logical Qonsistency, by purging their voluminous 166 MODERN ENGLAND [oHAt. m. writings of all trace of the real life that throbbed around them. How did these ingenious and amiable anarchists, the most influential of all the Utopians known to history, come to wield so large an influence, to dominate the thought of the next generation ? Of their personal virtues there can be no question ; but of most of their disciples we may safely reply : For the same reason that their opponents maintained the Corn Laws and pauper allowances — ^because it paid. The Manchester men were perfectly familiar with the view from Ducie Bridge, and with worse things still. They took a very mundane view of the Utilitarian philosophy ; and they were too numerous to feel any shame. So deep and universal was the confidence that it would pay, that the havoc of 1825 was soon for- gotten ; and the very masculine Miss Martineau, telling the tale twenty years later, could shed tears over the victims of the disturbance, and yet discover not an inkling of its' real significance. Schemers and dreamers conspired to blow this gigantic bubble. Companies were formed helter- skelter for the exploitation of ideas, some sound enough, some purely fantastic. Legends of El Dorado glorified the new-won independence of South America ; and in four months ten millions sterling was shipped thither in coin or bullion. Miners were sent out to the Andes, and milkmaids to the pampas ; the Birmingham merchants, in their eagerness to be first in the market, exported skates and warming-pans to Rio de Janeiro. Such § IV.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 167 was the outer fringe of the mania of speculation. The home market was flooded with the paper money of the provincial banks ; and, up to the height of the crisis, the Bank of England continued to issue its notes freely. The lowness of the rate of interest favoured borrowing and gambling with borrowed money. From the Ministers at West- minster down to the little shopkeepers and their wives, everyone seems to have succumbed to the fever. During the year, 286 private Acts were allowed by the House of Commons for the estab- lishment of shipping, canal, mining, gas, railroad, banking, and insurance concerns. In Macclesfield, newspaper advertisements announced that there were " wanted immediately from four to five thousand persons, from seven to twenty years of age, to be employed in the throwing arid manu- facturing of silk." But the imagined gold and silver, pearls and precious stones, of the South shone more entrancingly than any industrial enter- prise ; and it was reckoned that, in 1824 and 1825, no less than 86 millions of foreign loans were floated. The crash came in December. The bankers first felt the pressure, then the merchants and manu- facturers, then the people at large, fear deepening, as failure followed failure, into widening disorder, and finally into headlong panic. In six weeks more than sixty banks failed. Credit was almost extinct ; and, in face of a glut of unsaleable goods, works of all kinds were closed. This time, the 168 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. hi. middle classes shared with the workers the suffering of broken hearts and ruined homes ; and, if they did not so often feel the pain of actual starvation, they had their own peculiar ignominies of the usurer and the bankruptcy court. The first rioting in the North occurred at Sunderland in August, when the^ soldiery were brought out against a body of seamen on strike, who had attacked what would now be called a " blackleg " crew. Five persons were killed in this mSlee. Much more serious conflicts occurred in Lancashire during the following spring. Mobs of hungry out-o'-works marched from town to town, looting bakers' shops,; destroying machinery (in one day every power- loom in the Blackburn district was smashed), firing mills, and meeting the attack of the troops with scythes, hammers, roughly made pikes, and old muskets loaded with marbles. In Glasgow and Dublin, Trowbridge, Carlisle, Norwich, and Bethnal Green, there were less serious outbreaks. The Government sat with folded arms through the main period of this social convulsion, declaring that it could do nothing. At last, influential meetings of financiers were held to procure a voluntary restoration of credit. The Mint was set to work coining sovereigns ; the small-note currency of the banks was prohibited ; and the Bank of England offered advances on deposits of merchants' goods. A quantity of corn in bond in the ports was liberated ; and, after the severe drought of 1826, free import of oats, rye, beans, and peas was § IV.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 169 allowed. The Colonial Office now began to assist emigration. In 1820, 19,000 English folk had sought happier homes oversea, in the following year 13,000 ; in the prosperity of 1824 the number fell to 8,000 ; in the despair of 1826 it rose to 14,000, and probably it would have risen much higher if shipping facilities had been adequate. It has been estimated that the crisis cost the nation a hundred millions sterling. The figure has no statistical value ; but it serves to remind us that, amid the miseries of the decade following the great war, the remissions of taxation and the growth of industry and trade had enabled the middle and upper classes to save money, as well as to enlarge their houses and shops, their factories and estates. Manchester and Liverpool, Leeds, Birmingham, and other cities expanded greatly in this period. The paving and lighting of streets began ; sub- urbajti villadom was founded ; and the fishing villages of Kent and Sussex found that the bathing-van and the lodging-house might be more lucrative than the smugglers' yawl. Even in the smaller farm-houses, a contemporary tells us, " carpets, china plates, and glasses, are to be seen, instead of stone floors, trenchers, and drinking horns." The savings-banks, opened in 1818, were making good progress. The London Mechanics' Institute, founded in 1823, had over a thousand subscribers, and was being copied by a number of northern towns. The great modem clubs were rising in London ; the parks, markets, and streets were 170 MODERN ENGLAm) [chap. m. d- and the Thames Tunnel was being ^'^P''°^^n-traps and spring-guns were still projected^_^ i^^^^^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ^ ^^^,^ ^^^^ lega (11^^ ^^^ gibbet over a cowed country-side. But London University, founded in 1835, and the Society for Promoting the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, founded in the same year by Brougham and Lord John Russell, gave happier auguries ; and voices like that of Dr Arnold began to call for a humaner order. The crisis of 1825 arrested this progress, and made of many improvements so many pledges for future redemption. But it effected a clearance, and it acted as a warning. Many a man accustomed to wealth and privilege learned in misfortune the virtue and need of reform. The liberalism of the Ministry, the disappearance of the Duke of York and of George IV, the more frequent opposition of Commons and Lords, the removal of Catholic and Nonconformist disabilities, the slight modifica- tion of the Com Law by Wellington's sliding-scale in 1828, the stir of the French Revolution, and the opening of the Liverpool-Manchester railway, to which Huskisson's death gave tragic colour, in 1830 — these appear now as so many links in a chain of preparation for the crucial struggle in which the Oligarchy was at length overthrown. Before that year was out. Lord John Russell's Reform Bill had been carried through the Commons, and its rejection by a majority of 41 Peers had led to fresh disturbance. We have already spoken of §V.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 171 the rising of the agricultural labourers in the South, and its suppression. The agitation in the towns could not be suppressed. After the destruction of Nottingham Castle, and the breaking open of the prisons in Bristol and other places, a proclamation was issued declaring the political unions illegal. It had no effect ; and the failure of the Government's action against Cobbett for inflammatory writing exhibited the impotence of law when it challenges the anger of a nation. A carnival of outrage and coercion in Ireland, and a fearful visitation of Asiatic cholera, deepened the gloom of the winter. At length, the cry, " To stop the Duke, go for gold," having resulted in £1,800,000 being withdrawn from the Bank of England in three days — and the King having consented to create Peers if necessary — ^the Bill was swallowed by the Upper House, in June 1832. It disfranchised 56 nomination boroughs, containing less than two thousand inhabitants, which had returned 111 Members, and took away one Member from 30 others, and two from Melcombe Regis and Weymouth, thus vacating 143 seats. Sixty-five Members were given to the counties, two each to Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham, and nineteen large towns, including the metropolitan districts, and one each to 21 other towns hitherto unrepresented. The reformers had demanded adult suffrage ; they got nothing of the kind. In the counties, copyholders and leaseholders for years were added as voters to the 40s. freeholders, and tenants-at-will paying £50 a year received the vote. 172 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. hi. In the towns, a £10 household franchise was estab- lished, and the voting rights of freeholders were restricted. By supplementary Acts, the Scottish representation was increased from 45 to 53 Members (30 for counties, 23 for burghs), and the Irish from 100 to 105, with franchise changes similar to the English. The power of the landed Oligarchy was broken, but it remained very influential in political, and supreme in social, life. Parliament was now dominated by the middle class ; few industrial and no agricultural labourers received the vote. A great change had been made, but so tardily that more must soon follow. V. The Railway and Steamship The opening of the Stockton and Darlington rail- way, four years after its authorization by Parlia- ment in 1821, was a very modest inauguration of a new economic era. A signalman riding on horse- back in front of the engine represents for us the fears of the time ; yet to draw a load of ninety tons in thirty-four waggons at a rate of fourteen to fifteen miles an hour was a prodigious feat. It was immediately reflected in freight charges, and indirectly in prices ; thus, the price of coals at Darlington fell from 18s, to 8s. 6d. a ton. In 1826, railway building was begun in Scotland, with the Monklands Hne. In 1829, an English-built engine was running in the United States, and, in the § v.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 173 following year, the evolution of the American locomotive commenced. The last doubts of the commercial value of the new transport-power were removed when, at the opening of the Liverpool- Manchester line in 1830, Stephenson's " Rocket " drew a load of thirteen tons a distance of thirty-five miles in forty-eight minutes. The principal feature of this, the first high-speed locomotive, was the improved steam-blast for increasing the draft in the furnace, so making a smaller boiler possible. Progress in the manufacture of steel has brought in its train many improvements in construction. But essentially the steam-engine of to-day is the steam-engine of Watt and Stephenson ; and, when the best engineers have done their best, the rail- way locomotive remains the least efficient, by waste of fuel and mechanical imperfection, of all steam- engines. The rate of extension of British railways may be thus shown : 1840 miles 1,331 1880 miles 17,935 1850 „ 6,635 1890 „ 20,073 1860 „ 10,410 1900 „ 21,855 1870 „ 15,310 1909 „ 23,264 1909— Authorised Capital, £1,403,000,000. In the United States, building proceeded with a more reckless rapidity ; the mileage in 1900 was 198,964. Railway construction began in Canada and in Asia in 1853, and at the Cape in 1860. There were in 1907, not counting tramways, 601,808 miles 174 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. m. of railways in the world, more than half being in America, and less than a third in Europe. The difference of methods and conditions of construction is indicated by the fact that the paid-up capital per mile in 1908 was £33,333 in the United Kingdom, and only £10,372 in the United States. The steamship advanced step by step with the land locomotive, and it is to their co-operation that the vast growth of world-commerce is largely due. In 1820, the " Aaron Manby " made the voyage from London up the Seine to Paris without break- ing cargo ; in 1832 the " Elburkah," an iron steamer of Liverpool, twice ascended the Niger ; and in 1838 the " Great Western " and " Sirius " crossed the Atlantic, in 18 and 15 days respectively. The earliest steam vessels, whether for river or ocean service, were fitted with paddle wheels, and com- monly with beam-engines ; some paddle-boats remain upon the cross-Channel traffic to this day. But the value of space, the disadvantages of the paddles in heavy weather, the differing depths of freeboard (there will be a difference of 20 feet in the water-line of a modern tramp loaded or light), and the ad- vances of steel machinery, which made possible a faster-running engine, soon led to the adoption of the screw-propeller. The first considerable experi- ment was the " Great Britain," built at Bristol, 320 feet long, of 3500 tons burden, and 1000 horse- power. In 1844, the number of iron vessels built was so large as to require the establishment of a special Lloyds classification. A decade later, the § v.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 175 great advances of marine engineering began. John Elder's four-cylinder engines (1854-56) introduced much higher steam-pressures, and effected an economy of 60 per cent, in fuel. Double, triple, and quadruple types of compound engine followed. At the same time, the introduction of the double- bottom, of watertight bulk-heads, water-ballast, and other structural improvements have increased both the seaworthiness and the cargo capacity of steamships. Despite the obstructions raised by human folly, the tides of economic life flow over all political boundaries, and sooner or later fertilize every land. The best that any nation can hope is, by some natural advantage, to get the earliest benefits. Some of the advantages which gave England a long start in the Industrial Revolution were natural monopolies, or were at least owned to an exceptional extent. Such were the proximity of the coal- measures and the iron-beds, and, with this, a humid climate specially favourable to the textile processes ; the raggedness of the coast-line, which gave almost every important district access to cheap water carriage, and, with this, the aptness for sea- manship natural to an insular folk. Had the new power and machinery been applied only to manu- facture, our story would have proceeded on very different lines. But no sooner had the great inventions in productive industry begun to be common property in the most advanced countries, than the railway and marine engineers gave England 176 MODERN ENGLAND [ohap. hi. the second lift into the Steam Age. Hitherto, domestic development had necessarily followed the waterway and the highroad, on which physio- graphic conditions were supreme, and speed, as we understand it, was not. Manufacture had been stultified by the smallness of the home market. Foreign commerce, depending only on sea carriage, was relatively easier, limited as were the capacities of the best of sailing-ships ; hence, perhaps, those superior foreign interests which made us masters in the councils of Europe while cruel wrongs were bringing our own people to the brink of revolu- tion. The localization and specialization of industry had gone on uninterruptedly for three-quarters of a century ; the isolation of manufactures, their remoteness from allied trades and from the cus- tomer, was the trouble. The manufacturer wanted a wider choice of situation, a readier exchange of products and of services ; the merchant wanted a larger market for commodities ; the worker needed a wider market for his labour, cheaper and better food, and generally better access to the good things which invention had brought to birth. These are the opportunities which the railway created. Steam production gave trade energy ; steam distribution gave it the no less essential quality of mobility. Time and space were again repulsed in their eternal struggle with the life- principle. It was a social as much as an industrial devolution. The whole of Western civilization received a new stimulus — a new direction. A vast § v.] THE LOWEST DEPTH 177 levelling of opportunities has followed in the wake of the iron horse. In the main, it has been a level- ling up, though lucky individuals have managed to seize by far the greater part of the spoils. Land, both rural and urban, has received, directly and indirectly, an enormous increment of value, without effort on the part of its owners. On the other hand, the masses of the people have profited by the new stimtdus to and the new economy in manufactures ; by the opening up of large districts lying away from the old highways, and the first realization of their resources ; by the development of agriculture, fisheries, and minor industries ; and by the complex distribution of ideas through daily newspaper and penny post— both children of the railway. The most momentous creation of all is, however, nothing less than the modem city, as distinguished from the centre of a single local manufacture, trade, or market. The supersession of an old high- way and the towns upon it by some improved line of communications is a very old phenomena in history ; and, with the object-lesson of the auto- mobile and electric-car before us, we already know that the steam locomotive is not the last agent of the kind to effect a wide redistribution of the centres of human life and labour. The new facilities of personal movement also aided the concentra- tion of capital, the greater division of labour, the exchange of abilities and of goods. It is easier to feed five millions of people to-day than it was to feed fifty thousand three-quarters of a century M 178 MODERN England [chap, m. ago. Finally, railway property, commanding, as it has come to do, the whole trade of the country, has gathered round it, in its vast and rapid growth, a great entourage of stock speculators, dividend owners, and professional administrators. Pro- fessor Hadley estimated some years ago that railways represented a tenth of the total wealth of the civilized nations, and a quarter, if not a third, of their invested capital. A glance at the Statistical Abstract for the United Kingdom will show that an eleventh of the whole property assessed to income tax is of this kind. But such figures do less than justice to the important place which railways have reached in the national economy ; for many trades are directly dependent upon them, and, all round, rapid and efficient commu- nications must now be regarded as the basis of industrial life. As this dependence becomes less absolute, we can review impartially the oscilla- tions between competition and monopoly which characterize the Steam Age ; and we can appreciate the prophetic affirmation of Mr Gladstone's Com- mittee in 1844 (almost verbally anticipated by Stephenson himself) that " competition would do more injury to the railway companies than good to the public," while, on the other hand, " the effect of monopoly, both on the public directly, and indirectly, on the railway companies, was to be dreaded and guarded against." CHAPTER IV THE INFLUENCE OF THE ECONOMISTS To cite the evolution of opinion without regard to the facts out of which it arose is the most sterile kind of history. There is no idealism so transcen- dental as to be really independent of the time and place of its birth ; and all philosophies, though their authors may not realize it, are somewhere marked with the stain of circumstance. If, indeed, these gifts were as purely celestial as they seem to innocent eyes, they would have little effect upon the minds of ordinary men. For desire is the great digestive, in mind or body ; and philo- sophies, like grosser goods, are subject to a law of supply and demand. The dumb, groping self- interests of a generation accumulate. They demand intellectual expression — and a David Ricardo or a Karl Marx appears. They demand political ex- pression — and a Liberal bench faces a Tory bench, while a Labour leadership gathers sullenly outside. They may demand religious expression ; and new conflicts of Church and Chapel, Kingsleys and Newmans, Maurices and Puseys, will arise. Lite- rature will respond still more readily and finely ; and you will get, in Scott, Coleridge, Shelley, Hazlitt, X79 180 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. iv. and then in Dickens, Carlyle, Ruskin, and Morris, a picture-gallery reflecting the hopes and hungers, the ideals and anxieties of an epoch. Lastly, science will feel the current of demand ; a Darwin will find his kejTiote in an essay by a country parson, which he took up to read " for amusement," and a Huxley will give back to economics what his master took therefrom. These reactions of thought and social circum- stance, though there is no more entrancing subject, have been insufficiently studied. Why, for in- stance, did what was afterwards called the orthodox political economy emerge at this particular time ; and why did so dry a system as the deductive philosophy obtain a dominating influence in English public life ? It is probably true that every new school of thought that has appeared in the his- tory of mankind may be traced to a large social change, an unsettlement, or a resettlement, which required, first, its heralds, then its guides and orga- nisers, and, finally, its faithful few in the day of failure. The new philosophy did not produce the change in social organisation ; but, by its analysis and glosses, it quickened an unconscious into a partially conscious process, and provided arguments for the growing number of those who were pre- disposed to defend it. The laisser-faire doctrine had this double strength — it was based upon the greatest economic development of the era, and it gave self-seeking the appearance of something fundamentally beneficent and inexoi-ably necessary. CHAP. IV.] INFLUENCE OF ECONOMISTS 181 No more powerful combination of appeal can be imagined ; and, gradually, literature, science, religion, and governmental authority were brought into its service. The mass of the people continued to protest ; but their chief organ, trade unionism, was deeply affected by middle-class individualism until nearly the end of the century. Then the whole theoretic structure broke down ; and it now lies like an old machine abandoned on a slag heap. This is a very remarkable phenomenon ; and, without attempting to probe it deeply, we must note briefly its character and consequences. There are three books more sacred than all others in the history of the old political economy : Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations (1776), Malthus's Essay on Population (1798, and 1803), and David Ricardo's Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817). Smith, son of a Controller of Customs, was Professor of Logic at Glasgow University, and the first patron of Watt the in- ventor. Malthus, son of a Surrey landlord, was vicar of Albury, Essex, where he saw the agri- cultural labourer at his worst, and Professor of Political Economy at Haileybury. Ricardo, son of a Jewish stockbroker, made a fortune in the same business, bought the Irish pocket-borough of Portarlington (there were only twelve constituents, and he never visited them), and acquired great influence in Parliament by his knowledge of finance, then peculiarly valued. Personal experience of the Customs, the vicarage, and the money-market. 182 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. iv. explains some differences between the three men, the lapse of time more. Smith's book was a glorified pamphlet aimed at the politician and man of business ; and, synchronizing exactly with the American Declaration of Independence, it drew an indictment of the Navigation Acts, the Protective tariff, and other obstructions to commerce, so effective that the Free Traders of the next century hardly needed further argumentative material. Individualism — the theory that self-interest, oper- ating through a perfectly free competition of specialized units of labour and capital, would automatically procure the greatest good of the greatest number — was hardly more than implicit in Smith. He welcomed Bentham's legal and political elaboration of the principle ; his own contribution was altogether concrete. The need of personal freedom was a strong instinct with Smith ; but the fact that he admitted, for instance, the need of contract between employers and work- men, because of their inequality in bargaining, and such a phrase as that in which he describes employers as being in a " tacit combination " to restrict wages,i shows that he was far from having reached a complete and consistent theory. He ^ " It is not difficult to foresee which of the two parties must in all ordinary occasions have the advantage in the dispute, and force the other into a compUance with their terms. The masters, being fewer in number, can combine much more easily. . . . Masters are always and everywhere in a sort of tacit but constant and uniform combination not to raise the wages of labour above the actual rate " ( Wealth oj Nations, p. 28). CHAP, rv.] INFLUENCE OF ECONOMISTS 183 could have no idea of the revolution his young friend Watt was to accomplish ; he did not even live to see the power-loom at work. He will always be honoured as a great liberationist, a forerunner, who, however, cannot be saddled with the errors of the priests who follow him. Twenty years brought a vast change. The Revolution, triumphant in America and France, threatened in England. Godwin was preaching the revolutionary gospel that poverty is the result of bad government, and conjuring up golden visions, more clearly outlined by Robert Owen, of what England might be tuider a co-operative commonwealth. Pitt's judges and magistrates and soldiers gave one kind of answer to these apostles of democracy, a dangerous answer, never successful in the long run. Malthus did better. He invented a dogma,! ^ formula duly compoimded of miracle and morality, truly Calvinistic in its exclusiveness and its show of relentless necessity, very comforting to the few who could marry " prudently " and save " prudently," properly excommunicative of the rebellious outcasts of the countryside who had just forced the hands of the too benevolent magistrates at Speenhamland. A dogma must be capable of short statement ; and our courageous parson did not hesitate to state the whole process of human ^ The first edition of the Essay did little more than marshal a number of quite familiar arguments against the optimism of Godwin. Malthus then concluded that his position " had not perhaps been stated with sufficient force and precision " ; the edition of 1803 assumed, therefore, a more dogmatic form, 184 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. iv. evolution in a brief mathematical formula, thus : Mankind tends to increase in geometrical, the means of subsistence only in arithmetical, ratio. The sole checks upon this poverty-producing tendency in the nature of things are (1) positive (for instance, war, pestilence, vice), or (2) prudential (for instance, late marriage) ; and, as movements savouring of democracy or communism — movements to limit competition in labour, for instance — destroy pru- dential restraint, they are (after the diabolical deity of this creed) the great causes of poverty. How did this superstition obtain its tremendous vogue ? The Malthusian formula is an ingenious falsification. It is false in its parts, and still more false as a whole. If Godwin had had the type of mind to give tabloid for tabloid, creed for creed, he would have come as near the truth as may be in a short statement of a very complex matter by simply inverting the formula. For, as mankind lives, by and large, upon the lower forms of life, and as these forms are visibly more prolific than man himself, it may be said that the power of sub- sistence always tends to outstrip the power of population — at least up to the point of the actual overcrowding of the whole earth, a contingency sufficiently remote not to concern us. But let us not exaggerate our antithesis. The "tendency" is not static ; it is a ratio of two ever-varying factors. " Population " is not always and every- where the same, nor is subsistence. These are not mathematical quantities. Population does not, CHAP. IV.] INFLUENCE OF ECONOMISTS 185 as MaJthus suggested, grow, or even " tend " to grow, everywhere and at all times at the same rate ; neither is there any single rate of increase of man's means of subsistence. A " law " which can be defeated by " prudence " is evidently no law. A law is a generalization not from some, but from all, of the facts. But if Malthus had allowed for the intelligence without which man does not deserve the name of man, he would have had to revolutionize his formula. It would then have read something like this : So long as man is free and willing to use his brains, his prudence, all the faculties which constitute his superiority, to culti- vate the fertility of nature, his subsistence is safe — and only so long. This, however, would by no means have served the purpose. To-day the facts remain, the purpose has only a historical interest. What could be said a century ago, and can be said now with much greater confidence, is that the increase of the means of subsistence depends largely upon man's control over the natural re- sources and powers of the globe, and that, so long as his knowledge and skill in exploiting this natural bounty grow in proportion to his numerical increase, there is nothing to fear. It is only when, and in proportion as, man becomes degraded, and loses intelligent power over himself and his environment, that that environment ceases to yield to him the fruit necessary to support his increase. It will be seen, then, that Malthus got his sen- sational effect by falsifying the two factors of his 186 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. iv. ratio — ^by depreciating the potentialities of natural supply, and by depreciating the intelligence of man, which can as well be used to increase that supply as, by " prudential restraint," to limit his numbers. How did he persuade his generation to accept this double misrepresentation ? Sub- stantially, by assuming the permanence of the morbid conditions of his time. We have seen that the mass of the labouring population was, indeed, demoralized, and that the art of conquering Republican France, not the art of conquering Nature, filled the minds of the educated and governing classes. To support his first premiss, Malthus invented a second — ^the " law of diminish- ing returns," according to which, at a certain point, the addition of new units of human labour to the cultivation of a given piece of land will result in proportionately smaller return. The case of inferior lands brought into cultivation under the (altogether unintelligent) stimulus of the Com Laws was the classic illustration. Arnold Toynbee, in one of his rare lapses,^ says that " this law is true." It was, indeed, for long accepted as a true summary of agricultural experience. But so very little true is it as a resum^ of all the facts within modern knowledge that later economists have invented a " law of increasing returns " to account for cases to the contrary.^ There are cases of increasing ^ Industrial Revolution, p. 87. " Mr J. A. Hobson discusses diminishing returns suggestively in his Evolution of Modem Capitalism, pp. 372-74. Prof, S. J. Chapman, CHAP. IV.] INFLUENCE OP ECONOMISTS 187 and cases of decreasing returns, the former more frequent in manufacture, and the latter in agri- culture ; but there is no " law " in either direc- tion, if we use the word " law " with any approach to its significance in physical science. For Malthus and his friends, however, the idea of universal, inexorable law was essential. If they had merely said that demoralized labourers receiving "allowances" according to the numbers of their families, tend to multiply more rapidly than any subsistence they earn, they might have got the Speenhamland policy abolished sooner ; but they would not have explained away other kinds of poverty, and they would have been producing an argument for those who wished to raise, not those who wished to depress, wages. If they had merely said that, under tariff privilege, agriculture is unprofitably extended, they might have got the Corn Laws repealed sooner, but they would have left Godwin and Owen and Cobbett in possession of the field. In neither case would they have founded a school of economics. Darwin would have carried through his researches ; but there in his Political Economy, pp. 68-73, distinguislies " abstract laws " from " realistic laws," and gives one each for decreasing, increasing, and constant returns. But he warns the reader that " there is not yet among economists complete agreement upon this matter," and that " one defect of the realistic laws is that they cannot be universally affirmed. We have to introduce such qualifying phrases as ' usually ' or ' generally.' The absolute laws attain absolute universality, but only at the sacrifice of immediate applicability." It may be sug- gested that, when so positive a word as " law " has been thus robbed of all certainty, it is better not used at aU. 188 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. iv. would have been no generation of political Dar- winians to misrepresent the natural order of society as a " struggle for existence." Malthus restricted his ambitions, in the main, to the discovery of one or two " laws " which he persuaded himself were of universal and inexorable operation. This gives him a self-consistency which abler contemporaries did not possess. Bentham possessed it in a high degree ; yet he never really reconciled his prescrip- tion of a free working of individual self-interests with his statement of the aim of legislation as " the greatest happiness of the greatest number " ; or his keenness for popular education, public health, and better communications, with his desire to limit legislation to the negative task of obtaining security for wealth, industry, and contracts. The existence to-day of a " Malthusian League " is evidence of the controversial advantage of a pro- position so exceedingly simple as to be apparently self-evident. Malthus considered his " law " established in " the first six pages " of his essay, the rest being historical illustrations. Ricardo's was a subtler and more powerful mind, and his work admits of no such summary examination. But we may refer briefly to his statement of the wage-fund theory, the so-called "iron-law" of wages. The theory was that the sum of wealth available at any given moment for the payment of wages is not indeter- minate, but is fixed by natural law ; the capitalists cannot pay less, and the labourers cannot obtain ofiAP. IV.] DnFLUENCE OF ECONOMISTS 189 more. Trade-union action, therefore, cannot at any given time effect a general rise of wages, though it may enable one set of workers to get a larger share of the product at the cost of the rest. Under the Malthusian principle of necessarily excessive population, the number of labourers increases directly wages increase ; thus, the reward of labour can rise little above what is necessary for subsist- ence. Under the Malthusian principle of neces- sarily diminishing fertility of land, rent will tend to rise as commodities become dearer ; and, since the total product is limited, profits will fall. Even if the total to be divided increased more rapidly than the number of labourers, therefore, the best to be hoped for (the rise of prices cancelling any rise of nominal wages) would be that real wages of labour would be stationary. Time has disproved the proposition ; for popula- tion has doubled, and real wages have probably doubled, since Ricardo's time. But this dogmatic elaboration of the Malthusian " laws " imposed on nearly all the ablest thinkers of the day, though, curiously enough, it did not altogether impose on Malthus himself. Ricardo's system gained, as Toynbee says, an " unbounded ascendancy" over his own and the next generation. Bentham spoke of himself as the " spiritual father " of James Mill, and of Mill as the " spiritual father " of Ricardo. John Stuart Mill spoke of the Principles as " im- mortal." Christopher North put Ricardo above Adam Smith. Torrens spoke of him as " his 190 MODERN ENGIANB Ichap. IV. " Karl Marx built his revolutionary great master.^ ^^^ conception of value as due to fabo^^alone. De Quincey naively contrasts the work of earlier economists with the astonishing achievement of Ricardo, who " deduced a 'priori, from the understanding itself, laws which first gave a ray of light into the unwieldy mass of materials, and constructed a collection of tentative discussion into a science of regular proportions, now first standing on an eternal basis." This, strange to say, appears to be the secret of the immediate and immense success of the old political economy. It was a credulous, as well as an unbelieving, time. There was neither the means, nor often the desire, of precise information as to the human elements of the industrial problem. Malthus dared to propound a universal " law " of population before the first Census had shown the numbers of the British people, and before there could be any but the vaguest idea of what the birth-rate was or had been. The general registra- tion of births, deaths, and marriages did not even exist in Ricardo's day. He carried the abstract method to a much further extreme than Malthus ; but he brought so much subtler and more logical a mind to the task that a disciple of the calibre of De Quincey could glory in his having " deduced a priori, from the understanding itself, laws . . . standmg on an eternal basis." The characteristic work of nmeteenth-century Science, based upon impaitial and tireless observation and experiment, CHAP. IV.] INFLUENCE OF ECONOMISTS 191 was only just beginning. Philosophy was still unspoiled for its imaginative flights by the earthy taint of experimental psychology. Students of theology had not dared to project a science of " comparative religion " ; and the science of history was barely adumbrated. It was, then, quite in the spirit of the era that Senior declared political economy to be " independent of facts." It must not be supposed, because it was abused a century ago, that the method of abstraction as applied to social life was useless. As J. S. Mill said of Bentham, " We have a large tolerance for one-eyed men, provided their one eye is a penetrat- ing one." The deductive method has been con- tinued, and a mathematical school of economics has arisen which, under the check of an accumulat- ing body of precise evidence, has pursued valuable lines of thought. But the method of abstract science — the extraction of general and perma- nent characteristics from particular and passing instances, with its assumption that the results can be quantitatively measured — is open to peculiar difficulties and dangers in the sphere of economics. The chief of them — apart from the fundamental error in biology which has been indicated above — are these : (1) the quantities in question are inextricably mixed with human nature, and they are, therefore, never exactly repeated ; (2) there is a fundamental inequality or unlikeness in the most important of these quantities ; (3) the observer himself, in quest of 192 MODERN ENGLAND [chap, iv, a " law " in this field, is very liable to bias. The first point is self-evident. The a 'priori philosophers met it by assuming that things averaged out, capitalists acting in the interests of capital, labourers in the interests of labour, and rent-owners in the interests of rent. This was probably true, on the whole, though every day's experience gives instances of men who do not act in the interests of them- selves or their class. But the second point found no recognition in the old political economy, and herein lay its besetting sin. We may make abstracts of the contributions of certain groups of human individuals to the total of production, and call one abstraction capital, another land, and another labour. We may make another set of abstracts to describe the rewards of these three factors of production, and call them interest, rent, and wages. Within each group, there are in- equalities of contribution and reward ; but these inequalities are not, perhaps, sufficiently gross to invalidate the deduction. When we compare the three factors as wholes, however, we meet with an inequality of a much more far-reaching kind. Labour differs from land and capital, in the first place, in being inseparable from the life of its owner. It is a faculty rather than a possession ; and, as such, it is at once more precious and more perish- able. If it become necessary, for theoretical purposes, to regard it as a mass, we must be scrupulously careful that the characteristics com- mon to the individuals in whom alone it resides CHAP. IV.] INFLUENCE OF ECONOMISTS 193 are contained in the mass-description which we adopt. Thus : (1) The labourers are many, and much divided — hence competition is almost uni- versal between them, and combination is difficult to establish and maintain. But land is scarce, capital is relatively scarce, and combination is easy both to land- and capital-owners, so that their maintenance-reward is rarely in doubt. (2) Units of capital and land vary, but in no such radical fashion as units of labour. A single worker may be a man or a woman, young or old, single or with a dependent family ; these are final inequalities, fixed in the very constitution of human society. There are many minor inequalities, due to the irregular distribution of health, strength, and intelligence, the variations of subsistence from time to time and from place to place, and so on. (3) The owner of capital and land can usually wait either to sell or buy, and so can get the best price. The labourers, except a few of the most skilled, are handicapped by the fact that they usually cannot wait. Broadly, we may say that land and capital are homogeneous, scarce, durable, easily organized, and unpressed for time ; while labour is hetero- geneous, abundant, perishable, difficult of self- organization, and always near to hunger. Now, it is clear, without carrying this analysis further, that any abstract description of the process of pro- duction which assumes a likeness or equality in the three agents is untrue to the facts, some of them alterable, some unalterable, of human society. The N 194 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. rv. old political economy was repugnant to the whole working class of the time and to many humane spirits, who denounced it as brutal and heartless. That it tended to produce callousness in the average disciple's mind seems beyond doubt. But it is not the business of science to make pleasant reading. The real faults of the Malthusian-Ricardian economics were two : (1) It pretended to the quality of science ; but it was, in the main, a work of the imagination — a peculiarly logical type of imagination, it is true. (2) Its " inexorable laws " were false ; yet they were offered to every Tom, Dick, and Harry of the market-place as working principles worthy of implicit confidence. They were generally accepted as such, not because the process of reasoning was readily understood, but because its practical implications were clear, and were altogether to the taste of the positively or comparatively wealthy folk who then monopolized the advantages of education and the power of government. Intellectually false in its foundation, and morally false in its use, the orthodox pohtical economy represented to the mass of the workers a great refusal of justice, a denial of all hope. The rich, it appeared, might become endlessly richer because they were few ; the poor were doomed by the " laws " of population and wages to eternal penury because they were many. In the name of liberty, progress was declared impossible. It is not surprising that the names of the authors of these doctrines were execrated. Francis Place, CHAP, ivj INFLUENCE OP ECONOMISTS 195 speaking of the working-men reformers of the 'twenties, says that " they denounced everyone who dissented as a political economist, under which ap- pellation was included the notion of a bitter foe of the working classes — enemies who deserved no mercy at their hands," This feeling, if unjustifi- able, is no longer inexplicable. It was, perhaps, deepened because it found no adequate intellectual expression. As an influence in the events of the Reform and Chartist period, it cannot be overlooked. But few minds can tolerate logic unadulterated ; and, when the mind has done its worst, the heart will have its word to say. Probably, the extreme believers in this cold creed were never as numerous as their influence would suggest ; certainly, few of them acted consistently upon it. Place illustrated in his own person the conflict of abstract and con- crete motive. Mr Graham Wallas observes that he " never attained, perhaps never could have attained, the intellectual force required for original and creative economic thought." He was an earnest disciple of Bentham, and a still more earnest believer in Malthus's formula. Indeed, he started as early as 1822, with great zeal, a neo- Malthusian propaganda, and suffered as Charles Bradlaugh and his friends were to suffer half-a- century later. " The rest of the inner circle of the Benthamites seem to have shared Place's opinion, though he alone faced the public scandal." i But Place knew too much of real life to be altogether 1 Wallas, Life oj Place, pp. 166-69. 196 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. iv. misled. He had no sympathy with the orthodox view of the old Poor Law. " Mr Malthus," he said, " denies to the unemployed poor man the right to eat ; but he allows the right to the unem- ployed rich man." Place vehemently defended the workers from accusations of idleness and vice, vindicated their refusal to undersell one another, and urged the trade unions in the factory districts to exclude women and children from the mills and to lower hours of labour by general action. Scorn- ful of Godwin — " prince of spongers " — and of Owen, prince of dreamers, he never ceased working in his own business-like way for political and social reform. A great variety of influence may be traced among the middle-class writers, politicians, and adminis- trators of the time. There is Edwin Chadwick, labouring with equal zest to establish the health service and the workhouse tesb. There is Nassau Senior, making quite arbitrary calculations, which are solemnly quoted in Parliament, to show that all the profit of a factory is made in the last hour of the day, and that, if this hour's work were cut off, there would be no profit.^ There are the spokesmen of the manufacturers who mix up laisser- jaire precepts with smug dissertations on the pro- sperity of the factory operatives.^ There are the ^ Senior, Letters on the Factory Acts, 1837. » Edward Bainea, in his History 0/ the Cotton Manufacture (1836), saya " it is scarcely possible for any employment to be lighter," but admits that the children " are confined for long hours and deprived of fresh air ; this makes them pale and reduces their vigour, but it CHAP. IV.] INFLUENCE OF ECONOMISTS 197 well-to-do Nonconformists, confirmed in Ben* thamite individualism by the fact that the Church still monopolizes the patronage of the State. Where, in this jtmcture, were the philosophic Tories, with their professed love of the old moral ties of society, their hatred of revolutionary for- midae ? Burke's words, flung angrily at the Jacobins of Paris, might now have been addressed to the apostles of laisser-faire : " The age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calcu- lators has succeeded. . . . All is to be changed. All the pleasing illusions which made power gentle, and obedience liberal, which harmonized the dif- ferent shades of life, and which, by a bland assimi- lation, incorporated into politics the sentiments which beautify and soften private society, are to be dissolved by this new conquering Empire of light and reason. All the decent drapery of life is to be rudely torn off. All the superadded ideas, furnished from the wardrobe of a moral imagina- tion, which the heart owns, and the understanding ratifies, as necessary to cover the defects of our naked, shivering nature, and to raise it to dignity in our own estimation, are to be exploded as a ridiculous and antiquated fashion. . . . Nothing is left which engages the affections on the part of the rarely brings on disease." He adds that, " though improvidence and misconduct too often ruin the happiness of these families, yet there are thousands of spinners who eat meat every day, wear broad- cloth on the Sunday, dress their wives and children well, furnish their houses with mahogany and carpets, subscribe to publications, and pass through life with much of humble respectability." 198 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. iv. commonwealth." No second Burke arose to vindi- cate the social principle. For this is a crucial difference : political revolution, as in Paris, chiefly injures the few rich; industrial revolution, as in Manchester, chiefly injures the many poor. Disraeli might have become a second Burke, had the circum- stances been favourable. He voted repeatedly for the repeal of the new Poor Law, voted in minori- ties for inquiry into the Birmingham riots in 1839, and for remission of the excessive sentences on the Chartist leaders in 1840 and 1846, and put into the mouths of his paper heroes such words as these : " If a spirit of rapacious covetousness, desecratirig all the hunianities of life, has been the besetting sin of England for the last century and a half, siace the passing of the Reform Act the altar of Mammon has blazed with triple worship. To acquire, to accumulate, to plunder each other by virtue of philosophic phrases, to propose a Utopia to consist only of Wealth and ToU, this has been the breathless business of enfranchised England for the last twelve years, until we are startled from our voracious strife by the wail of intolerable serfage." ^ The few independent Tories who, from the verge of the " voracious strife," hurled ill names at the manufacturers counted for little. What did gradu- ally count was the obstinate insubordination of the people themselves, and the emergence— aided by cholera epidemics and Chartist riots — of a sense of national as distinguished from, and even opposed to, purely individual interest. Hume, Bright, and » "Sybil," Book I., ohap. v., 1845. CHAP, iv.] INFLUENCE OF ECONOMISTS 199 Roebuck continued to harangue the legislature on the danger of interfering with the captains of industry. But Macaulay, in one of the flashes of perception which justify the romantic temperament, anticipated, in a speech in May 1846, the verdict of later years : " Rely en it that intense labour, beginning too early in life, continued too long every day, stunting the growth, of the mind, leaving no time for healthful exercise, no time for intellectual culture, must impair all those high qualities which have made our country great. Your overworked boys will become a feeble and ignoble race of men, the parents of a more feeble progeny ; nor will it be long before the deterioration of the labourer will injuriously affect those very interests to which his physical and moral energies have been sacrificed. . . . Never wiU I believe that what makes a population stronger and healthier, wiser and better, can ultimately make it poorer. If ever we are forced to yield the foremost place among commercial nations, we shall yield it to some people pre-eminently vigorous in body and mind." The science of political economy suffered through- out the nineteenth century from the inadequate information and the doctrinaire method of its founders. But fact at length made itself felt in the academic twilight. Economics fell back into its proper place of handmaid to Politics. From the publication of Maine's Ancient Law, in 1861, may be dated a strong influence from the side of social history. In 1869, J. S. Mill abandoned the wage- fund theory. Jevons and Bagehot, in the later 200 MODERN ENGLAND [chap, iv. 'seventies, stood for a less abstract view of State functions than that expressed by Fawcett when he said " we might as well think of regulating the tides " as of determining wages by Act of Parlia- ment. With Arnold Tonybee's Industrial Revolu- tion (1884), the whole subject began to appear in perspective, and an evolutionary view of both the events and the philosophy of the period became possible. By a curious irony, it fell to Herbert Spencer, perhaps the stiffest individualist of his day, to demolish the Malthusian principle which was the chief strength of the individualism of the earlier generation. CHAPTER V ON THE VERGE OF REVOLUTION 1833-1849 I ■, . I. A Late Harvest This, of all the periods into which the story of the century divides itself, shows most complication and obscurity of motive, and is, therefore, most difficult of summary description. There are five major quantities to be kept in view, in the general course of political and economic life : (1) the first great Factory and Mines Acts, and the commencement of serious health administration ; (2) the new Poor Law ; (3) the commercial crisis of 1839, the Irish potato famine of 1845-46, and the commercial crisis of 1847 ; (4) the commingled agitation of Trade Unionism, Owenism, and Chartism, and (5) the Free Trade movement. We shall see that, despite a great harvest of reforms, the new Parliament did not win the confidence of the masses ; that the country was brought again to the verge of revolu- tion ; and that the agitation then suddenly expired. Was it merely that the people were satisfied with cheap food and expanding trade ? How are we to account at once for the power developed by the labour organizations, and its collapse ? 201 202 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. v. A list of the chief acts of the Reform ParUament in these seventeen years (eleven years under Whig, and six under Conservative, Ministries) indicates the extent and character of the political change that had been effected. First come two great works of emancipation — ^the freeing of negro slaves in the British possessions (with a solatium of twenty miUions sterling to the slave-owners), and the abolition of the remains of the East India Company's monopoly, already cut down in 1813. Europeans were now given free access to India both for trade and residence ; equahty of status between natives and foreigners, without bar of race or religion, was also decreed. The China trade, hitherto reserved to the Company, was thrown open ; it doubled in the next decade, while British exports to India increased threefold. The session of 1833 was also marked by the tardy passage of Lord Ashley's Factory Act, the provisions of which will be ex- plained directly, of the first parliamentary grant in aid of elementary education (£20,000), and some small reforms in the Protestant Church in Ireland. In the following year, that of the new Poor Law, the last arbitrary dismissal by the Crown of a Prime Minister (Lord Melbourne) took place; and the Central Criminal Court was established. In 1835, the immense task of municipal reform, neces- sarily postponed till the House of Commons had been rescued from the influence of the borough- mongers, was taken up. The Municipal Corpora- tions Act put an end to the existing corruption, and § I.] ON THE VERGE OP REVOLUTION 203 established, in 178 cities and towns having a total population of two millions, elective councils, with power over paving, lighting, police, rating, and other local business. The Act had three limitations which have been slowly remedied : it created only a narrow franchise ; it did not touch London, which sheltered as many scandals as all the other cities put together ; and it left the counties in the hands of the justices. The year 1836 witnessed an important inquiry into the sanitary condition of the industrial districts, the establishment of the office of Registrar-General of births, deaths, and marriages — ^henceforth the chief fount of official statistics bearing on the health of the people — and the removal of the bar against Nonconformist marriages. Henceforth, marriage was a civil act, the religious ceremony optional. The next three years were a period of acute depres- sion, in which the Chartist and Free Trade move- ments emerged as organized forces. During this period, the young Princess Victoria came to the throne, with Prince Albert as her adviser ; English tithes were commuted, and the Ecclesiastical Com- missioners incorporated ; the newspaper stamp duty was reduced to one penny and penny postage established ; the principle of the new Poor Law was carried over to Ireland ; and Lord Durham was sent as Governor-General to Canada, there to initiate a noble work of pacification. In 1839, the Education grant was increased to £30,000 ; its administration was lodged in a Committee of the 204 MODERN ENGLAND [ohap. V. Privy Council ; and the inspection of assisted schools was commenced. In 1840, the transporta- tion of convicts to Australia ceased ; self-govern- ment under a responsible government was given to Canada; and the Irish municipalities were reformed. The five following years, under Peel, the last considerable period of Conservative rule for three decades, yielded only one considerable achievement in legislation, but this was sufficient to immortalize its authors. In 1842, the first Act was passed for the protection of coal-miners ; and Peel set up a new sliding-scale of corn duties, abolished many other protective duties, and revived the income- tax to compensate for the revenue lost. More duties were removed in 1844, and no less than 480 in 1845. It was in face of these measures, prophetic of still more radical change, and of the consequent agricultural outcry, that young Disraeli uttered his famous description of such " Conservative " gov- ernment as " an organized hypocrisy." The Irish potato famine of the following winter suggested wiser thoughts, and precipitated the re))eal of the Corn Laws. The year 1847 saw the passage of Fielden's " Ten Hours " Factory Act, the introduc- tion of short service in the army, another financial crisis, and a second cholera epidemic which led to the passage of the Public Health Act of 1848, the basis of administrative efforts that were to save millions of lives before the century was out. Finally, the Navigation Laws were totally repealed, and the § 1.] ON THE VERGE OF REVOLUTION 205 abolition of the com duties (save Is,, which re- mained for twenty years) came into full effect, in 1849. In the short space of eighteen years, then, the Crown had accepted its constitutional limitations, the House of Commons and the little governments of city and town had been cleansed, and the power of the Peers had been checked. A number of free Colonial democracies had been established in the Western and Southern Hemispheres; slavery had been abolished on British soil ; and the East had been thrown open to trade, with some promise of fair treatment for the natives. Henceforth, the British people might call upon all lands for food and materials of manufacture ; shipping was freed ; and taxation was in part transferred to surplus wealth. The beneficent work of factory and mine Inspection, sanitary administration, and public schooling was initiated. The world's history shows nothing to equal this record, with the possible ex- ception of the reforms with which Napoleon capped the programme of the Fi-ench Revolution. And yet the people were violently dissatisfied. Why ? There is no single answer to such questions as this ; but they help us to focus more clearly the movements of the time, and to understand better the permanent conditions of successful government and social peace. It is evident that the buying-out of the West Indian slave- owners, and the grant of responsible government to Canada, could bring no immediate relief to the hungry and voteless weaver 206 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. v. of the West Riding. In every land, domestic ques- tions are of first moment ; and, among domestic questions, the bread-and-butter problem must be solved ere other boons can be properly appreciated. In the second place, the harvest of reform does not come up in a night ; and, if the sowing has been long delayed, half the crop may be lost. Sydney Smith said of the Reform Bill, " All young ladies imagine as soon as this Bill is carried that they will be instantly married," and cjoiically dismissed the disappointed as " fools." When the fools are numbered by the million, however, their disappoint- ment becomes a matter of consequence. Viewed absolutely, in isolation, these Factory and Mines Acts, for instance, are notable achievements ; in relation to the long-suffering of the operatives, and the merits of the question as we now see it, they are beggarly instalments of common justice given a full generation too late. II. The First Factory Acts The story of the Factory Acts and of the shame of child slavery in which they originated has often been told; a slight outline of this struggle of common- sense and humanity against dogma and heartless- ness will, therefore, be sufficient in this place. The first attempt to improve the health conditions of industrial employment was the Health and Morals Act of 1802, procured by Sir Robert Peel the elder, who (this is his son's account of the matter) acted § II.] ON THE VERGE OF REVOLUTION 207 as soon as magisterial complaint brought to his notice abuses among the thousand apprentices in his own factory which the overseer had previously concealed from him. Such abuses had by that time become very common, and had been formally de- nounced by bodies of medical men in 1784 and 1796.1 With the help of a single narrative — ^that of one Robert Blincoe, published in 1828 — we may peep for a moment into this underworld. Blincoe was an orphan who drifted into the St Pancras Workhouse at the age of four years, and at seven was apprenticed for fourteen years to a Nottingham cotton-spinner. The formal consent even of chil- dren being necessary, Blincoe and eighty other little victims were told that cotton factories were palaces where roast-beef, plum-pudding, and other good things were to be had for the asking. This did not prove exactly true. The children were kept working for fourteen, and even sixteen, hours a day ; they were beaten for the slightest mistake or offence ; and sometimes they were tortured by the overlookers, who would tie them to a beam close over the whirling machines by way of teaching them to hold their feet up, or would rivet irons on their ankles and hips to teach them not to try to run > Manchester Literary and PhUosophical Society Memoirs, 1784 ; Beport on Parish Apprentices, 1815; Fielden's Curse of the Factory System, 1836. In their History of Factory Legislation, Misses B. L. Hutohins and A. Harrison, B.A., point out that " no materials exist for anything like a statistical or accurate study of child-labour in the eighteenth century " ; but there is evidence that children were often overworked and ill-treated at home by their parents. 208 MODERN ENGLAND [chap. v. away. Locked in the factory while they worked, and in neighbouring barracks while they slept, these piiiful martyrs were as absolutely abandoned by their kind as though they had been adult con- victs on the way to Botany Bay, or negro slaves on the middle passage. Peel's first Act applied only to apprentices in cotton mills ; it forbade their being worked more than twelve hours a day, and laid it down that night work should cease after a short interval, that decent clothing, lodging, and food should be pro- vided, and that all factories should be whitewashed and ventilated. It was practically inoperative, partly by reason of evasion, partly by a change of the trade conditions. Before the application of the steam-engine to textile machinery, the mills were scattered along the streams of the country-side. The irregularity of water-power favoured great irregularity in the working-day ; and there were no prying eyes in these out-of-the-way places. Steam brought the factory into town, made work more regular, and indirectly contributed to the abandonment of pauper 'prentice labour. The first effect of the Act, however, was simply to abolish the formality of apprenticeship. In June 1815, Peel again called attention to the need of a protective law. " The practice of apprenticing parish children in distant factories was," he said, " as repugnant to humanity as any which had ever been suffered to exist by the negligence of the legislature ; and it was all the worse because of the § II.] ON THE VERGE OF REVOLUTION 209 enormous abuses which existed in it. It had been known that a gang of these children had been put up to sale along with a bankrupt's effects, and trans- ferred as part of the property. A case had come to his knowledge where an agreement was made between a London parish and a Lancashire manu- facturer that for every twenty sound children one idiot should be taken." i This appeal seems to have made no impression, for the Bill proposed was withdrawn after the first reading. The employers, in fact, were no longer an uneducated class risen by force from out of the ranks of labour. They could express themselves, and buy legal or lite- rary advocates ; and, from this time on, there is obstinate resistance to every attempt to impose conditions of employment. Their most plausible argument lay in the fact that nobody then dreamed of an inspection of the domestic workshops, where, in the deepening distress of the hand-workers, the lot of the children was often worse than it would be in a factory. Robert Owen gave evidence before Peel's Committee as to his own experiments. He had no children in his mill under ten, and the general hours had been gradually reduced from fourteen to twelve, including an hour and a quar- ter off for meals. The working strength of the mill was so much improved that the loss was only one farthing in Is. 8d. This example made few converts. In February 1818, pressed forward by Owen, ^ Hansard, vol. xxx. 624. 2 10 MdDERlf ENGLAND [chap. V. the elder Peel returned to the charge. Presenting a petition from Manchester cotton-spinners for a •ten-and-a-half hours' day, he added that " he had been in communication with some of these poor men that morning ; and he declared he could nob hear their statement, or witness their appearance which confirmed that statement, without shedding tears. In rooms badly ventilated and much over- heated, they were compelled to work fourteen or fifteen hours a day. Young persons might endure such labour ; but after men attained a certain age it became intolerable." This appeal was dis- missed as sheer sentimentality ; nearly a century was to pass ere British society was prepared to recognize the hardness of life's evening in the labouring classes. A few days later. Peel reintro- duced his Bill, modified to forbid the employment of children under nine (instead of under ten) and to limit the working hours of those under sixteen years to twelve per day. It was notorious, he said, that children of a very tender age were dragged from their beds some hours before daylight, and confined in the factories for not less than fifteen hours. His son, the future Free Trade Premier, added that there was evidence of boys and girls of five and seven years being employed ; and they were often kept on Sundays from 6 a.m. to noon cleaning the machinery. Lord Stanley distinguished himself by arguing that Parliament should not, by such interference as was asked for, sow dissension be- tween parents and children ; and other noble lords § n.] ON THE VERCE OP REVOLUTION 211 upheld " the great principle of Political Economy that labour ought to be free." Again, the Bill was dropped. In 1819, after further opposition, it was carried. The Act applied only to cotton mills. Years later, the future poet of democracy, Gerald Massey, then a child of eight years, was working twelve hours a day in a silk mill for a wage of eighteen pence a week. This commencement of factory legislation proper was of very limited effect, even within its limited field, and that for a moral reason and a practical reason. The number of those who fully reahzed and admitted the evil was very small (medical witnesses in these early years were particularly pusillanimous) ; and the lack of a special body of inspectors made evasion of the law easy. On the part of the operatives themselves, there was a con- siderable obstacle in the growth of the system by which the spinners themselves, not the mill-owners, employed their child " piecers." In 1825, when Sir John Cam Hobhouse obtained an amending Act, limiting Saturday work to nine hours, and for- bidding work during meal times, the customary hours in Lancashire mills were from 5.30 or 6 a.m. to 7.30 or 8 p.m., with two intervals for meals, during which the children were commonly kept cleaning the machinery. In 1831, a further amend- ing Act brought all operatives under eighteen years of age in cotton mills within the protection of the twelve-hours day, and prohibited the night employ- ment of all under twenty-one. Richard Oastler, ^^^ to the Leeds Mercury on " Yorkshire with his le*^*^'^ Michael Sadler, Tory Member for Slavery," ^^ ^^^ p^^ themselves at the head of ■"^^^Ten Hours' Day agitation. Sadler obtained in 1832 a Commons Committee whose report is in- valuable as a collection of evidence of the industrial conditions then prevailing. He lost his seat directly after, being defeated by Macaulay ; and Lord Ashley, later Lord Shaftesbury, became leader of the move- ment in Parliament. A Royal Commission was appomted, with the hope, at least on the side of the employers, of shelving the subject. It reported, however, that the existing law was " almost en- tirely inoperative," children being commonly em- ployed as long as adults, with the result that they suffered physically and obtained no education ; and that the only way of ending these wrongs was to establish a special body of itinerant inspectors, with power to enter any factory where children v/ere employed, to order sanitary measures and the fencing of machinery, and to enforce school attendance. It is this provision, probably due to Chadwick's influence, that chiefly constitutes the importance of the Factory Act of 1833, one of the first measures of the reformed House of Commons. Hardly less important than the establishment of that gallant branch of the Civil Service, the factory inspectorate, was the extension of the Acts to woollen, worsted, thTn^oKl"^:- *°'^' ^^^"' ^