38130 ■iity^ 5^ '' !■ ■^^ '<: r^V*^ ^ ^ijsmi UNIVERSITY) Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924031757846 ONE YEAR OF COMPULSORY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE IN MARYLAND 1916-1917 t Every child is entitled to a common school education. \\ It is unfair to tax a man to educate his neighbor's child and then permit the neighbor to keep that child out of school. f The Attendance Law held in school all last year 5,500 children who, but for the Law, would have been absent. % Our schools cost annually $30 per child in attendance. H And these 5,500 children got $165,000 worth of school- ing. % It cost only $18,000 to hold them in school. % Was this good business for the Sta^e? If It was. It paid 800%. f This pamphlet tells why. Missing Page ONE YEAR OF COMPULSORY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF MARYLAND. The school year closing July 31, 1917, witnessed the completion of one year of compulsory school attendance throughout all the counties of Maryland. The General Assembly in its session of 1916, slightly modified the Compulsory School Attendance Law, which heretofore had applied only to Baltimore City and two counties, and made it apply to all the counties of the State. By its provisions, children seven to thirteen years of age must attend school the full term unless lawfully excused. Children of thirteen and fourteen years must attend at least one hundred days, and the entire term if not regularly and lawfully employed. Children fifteen and sixteen who have not finished the elementary school must attend at least one hundred days each year, and the entire term if not regularly and law- fully employed. As the law provides that necessary and legal absence may be excused, but does not define what constitutes lawful absence, the State Board of Education, at a meeting August 30, 1917, passed the following by-laws defining lawful absence and some other terms : LAWFUL ABSENCE. Absence shall be considered lawful only under the following conditions : 1. Death in the immediate family. 2. Illness of child. The principal shall require a physician's certificate from the parent or guar- dian of a child reported continuously absent for illness. 3. Quarantine. Quarantine shall be understood to mean isolation by order of the local or of the State Board of Health, and a physician's certificate certifying the time of absence required by the quarantine shall be secured by the principal. 4. Court summons. 5. Incapacity. (Physical.) "Physical Incapacity' shall be interpreted as meaning such a state of ill- health or physical defect as shall render the instruction of the child im- practicable in any other than a special class or school ; and the attendance officer may require of the parent a certificate to this effect, signed by a ^ repiitablp physician. " i! .S •& I flu ^ o a 0) 4-) s o •& t6 Q. U a. E 3 II s § a (2 g)0 0. H si i^^ o^ u,« z aovbo *4» iNiisev AlinJMV-wn AHM 1 Hi.NOMfilHl iNsesv AiindMv-iNn s^va ^iNasav ' ! 1 Ainn^iMVT *HM Hiwow siHi iNassv Ai-injMvi SAwa HiNO« — siHx iNasaud bavq MV3A I S IL < O Z K u i "^ < X H i < I Q z 3 1 ft Original 6x4 inches. This is Obverse Side PRINCIPAL'S REPORT OF URGENT CASES 1 i>OL No . District No PRir >iCiPAL Date 1 DI9 NOF TANCE PR< ITH S 3M SCHOOL OUTH PARINT OK GUARDIAN POSTOPFICE ACTDRESS MILES OR BLOCKS --. AlWENT CHILDREN. r NAME FIRST NAME DATE OF BIRTH ATTENDANCE RECORD | CAUSE OF ABSENCE^ e z >■ < a < h si DAYS UNLAWFULLY ABSENT SINCE ENROLLED DATE LAST IN SCHOOL GRADE u [ ■ 1 i ~ Children from this Ul. * Use Code U for Cause of Absence. Indifference of parent. U5. Poverty. UMBER are now in regular attendance. METHOE OF TREATMENT DATE FORM LETTER No. 1 FORM LETTER No 2 PERSONAL LETTER VISITED VISITED VISITED PROSECUTED RESULT U2. IndiSerence ol cbild. U6. Unlawfully employed. U3. Health of parent. U7. Truant. U4. Health of others in family, U8. Suspended. Reverse Side RECORD OF ATTENDANCE OFFICER PERSONS INTERVIEWED RESULT OF INTERVIEW SUBSEQUENT HISTORY 6 Compulsory School Attendance 6. Incapacity. (Mental.) "Mental Incapacity" shall be interpret'ed to mean feeble-mindedness or such nervous disorders as to make it either impossible for such a child to profit by the instruction given in the school, or impractical for the teacher Prop- erly to instruct the normal pupils of the school ; and the attendance officer may require of the parent a certificate to this effect, signed by a reputable physician. 7. Violent Storms. "Violent Storms" shall be interpreted to mean only such conditions of the weather as would endanger the health or safety of the child when in transit to and from school. DEFINITION OF TERMS. 1. "Being thirteen years of age, or fourteen years of age" shall' be construed to mean from the thirteenth to the fifteenth birthdays. 2. "Being fifteen years of age, or sixteen years of age" shall be construed to mean from the fifteenth to the seventeenth birthdays. 3. "Elementary School" shall be construed to mean the elementary school course of seven grades, as set forth in the State Course of Study. The State Superintendent was authorized to prepare and pre- scribe any blanks and report forms, necessary to promote an efficient and reasonably uniform administration of the law. The two forms reproduced on pages 4 and 5, prepared with the assistance of Mr. John T. Hershner, Chief Attendance Officer for Baltimore County, and Mr. George L,. Jones, General Secretary of the Henry Watson Children's Aid Society, were prescribed in September, 1916. Two letters were written to the county superintendents and at- tendance officers, explaining the blanks and interpreting the law- September 20, 1916. To the County Superintendent: ' 1. I am sending you herewith copies of some by-laws adopted by the State Board of Education to supplement the Compulsory Attendance Law. 2. I am sending, also,, two sample report forms to be used by the teacher or principal in reporting absent pupils to the attendance officer. The monthly report of absent pupils furnishes the names of pupils absent three or more days and such other information about them as will assist the attendance officer in his work. The other form is to be used for reporting urgent cases and such cases as require more immediate and special attention, and should be sent to the attendance officer as occasion demands. These two forms are prescribed by the authority of the State Board of Education, under Chapter 3, Sec. 13, of the School Law. They may be modified or expanded to include any additional information desired ; but the form finally adopted by any county should include, at least, the information called for on these forms. Reports to this office that may be called for later, can be com- piled from the reports on these forms, if they are kept on file. The report forms are offered as samples. After making such modifications as you deem necessary, you should have them duplicated in sufficient quantity to supply each school in the county. I do not expect the forms to be entirely satisfactory. In drafting them the best available experience has been drawn upon, but I am hoping that I may have suggestions for further improving them by another year. 3. Recently I had a conference with Chairman Fox, of the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, in regard to the apparent conflict between the Child Labor Law and the Compulsory Attendance Law. The Bureau of Labor and Statistics has heretofore been authorized to issue employment certificates to fourteen and fifteen-year-old children who had completed the fifth grade. The Compulsory Missing Page ■8 Compulsory School Attendance to June 1, 1916; provided such children are now regularly and lawfully employed. I am sending an extra copy of this letter for the information of your Attendance Offieer. Very truly yours, M. BATES STEPHENS, State Superintendent. On the whole the attendance officers used persuasion rather than force, but the magistrates before whom the prosecutions were brought co-operated splendidly with the attendance officers in en- forcing the law. However, some questions arose in regard to coiirt procedure in prosecuting offenders and the State Superintendent addressed a letter to the Attorney General for advice and informa- tion. THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT'S LETTER. 1 am submitting herewith some questions on Sections 160-172 of Chapter 506 of the Acts of 1916, with reference to procedure before magistrates against parents in the enforcement of the Compulsory School Attendance Law. 1. Is the teacher's daily register evidence of age when the teacher entered the age of the child as reported by the child upon his entrance in school ? Is such record of age admissible when the date of birth has been verified con- tinuously by such reports from the same child from year to year? Is the teacher's record admissible as evidence when the age was entered in the same way from the oral or written statements of the parent? 2. If the parent questions the accuracy of the teacher's record can such parent be required to establish the age of the child by birth certificate, baptismal certificate, vital records, or in any other way? 3. Does the School Attendance Officer have authority to serve the warrant in person on the accused and make the arrest? 4. Is it necessary to name the child or children unlawfully absent from school in the warrant drawn for the arrest of a parent, or may the warrant read "who has minor children unlawfully absent from school," without specifying names and ages? THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S OPINION. I beg to reply to your recent inquiries relative to prosecutions against parents under the Compulsory School Attendance Law, Bagby's Code, Art. 7T, Sees. 153-172, as amended by the Act of 1916, Chapter 506, Sees. 156, 162 and 173, which amend Sees. 156, 153A and 173 of Art. 77. 1. The teacher's daily register, which contains the age of the child as given either by the child or by the parent, is not direct legal evidence of the child's! age in a prosecution against the parent. If the statement in this register as to the child's age was given by the child, then it cannot legally be used at all against the parent. If the statement was given by the parent, then the register itself is still not direct evidence against the parent. Weaver vs. Leiman, 52 ]\4d., 708. Hall vs. Trimble, 104 Md., 323. In this latter case, however, the teacher herself could testify to what the parent told her was the child's age, and the teacher could refresh her recollec- tion on this point by referring to the register. But it is the teacher's testimony that is admissible, and not the register. ' The statement in the register as to the child's age is not made admissible as legal evidence by reason of the fact that it may have been repeatedly verified by the child. Missing Page Compulsory School Attendance All Children. White. Colored County 1914 1915 1916 1914 1915 1916 1914 1915 'l916 1915 1916 1917 1915 1916 1917 1915 1916 1917 8. 3.7 2.1 11.7 3.9 2.3 11.4 -2.0 -1.2 18.9 9. -1.3 3.8 10.6 -.6 4.0 -.6 -2.9 3.2 27.6 10. 1.9 2.7 10.4 -2.6 2.0 4.5 .4 -13.4 21.3 11. 7.6 -2.0 9.6 7.1 0.0 9.0 9.1 -8.3 U.S 12. 1.3 1.4 9.1 1.4 1.9 9.2 -.4 -8.8 7.4 13. 6.0 -8.5 8.0 9.7' -11.7 8.2 -27.1 13.2 6.3 14. -1.6 6.6 7.0 .7 3.1 6.9 -9.4 6.9 7.1 15. .1 10.4 6.8 5.4 4.1 2.9 -7.3 18.9 11.6 16. 2.2 -.4 4.6 1.6 -.3 5.2 7.1 -.7 -.8 17. 2.7 2.8 4.3 2.7 3.0 4.5 3.5 -9.2 -6.1 18. 5.3 3.2 4.2 5.1 4.4 3.6 8.0 0.0 10.6 19. 3.7 -.6 4.2 11.4 2.7 2.0 -12.7 -8.4 8.5 20. .6 1.2 4.0 .8 1.2 4.0 - - - 21. 1.4 3.2 1.8 1.8 1.8 .1 -1.5 12.2 11.9 22. 3.1 2.2 -1.1 3.7 .1 -2.8 1.6 7.1 2.4 23. -.4 1.7 -3.8 .1 2.S -2.5 -1.7 -.2 -7.3 All Countiei! — 4.0 1.4 7.5 4.3 1.7 6.0 2.6 -.1 14.7 In studing the increases in the daily attendance given below for each county during the last five years, it should be born in mind that there are several factors afiEecting the increase or decrease in any given county, and the reader is advised not to judge the enforce- ment of the law in any one county solely by the increase in attend- ance. A rapidly growing population, or a large number of children heretofore out of school would tend to make an unusual showing. Counties which already had a large percent of their children in school, which have a decreasing population, or part of the schools closed for any length of time would tend to make a poor showing. As these several factors tend to offset each other, the increase in the State as a whole can be taken as a fair measure of the influence of the School Attendance Law. TABLE SHOWING AVERAGE ATTENDANCE IN THE SEVERAL COUN- TIES BY YEARS AND THE INCREASES OVER PRECEDING YEARS. FOR THE FIVE YEARS ENDING JULY 31, 1917! County Allegany Anne Arundel Increase Per Cent. Year Average attendance for year over preceding year of increase over preceding 1917 9,521 715 year 7.5 1916 8,806 297 3.4 1915 8,509 254 3.0 1914 8,255 297 3.6 1913 7,958 1917 5,953 563 9.3 1916 S,39Q 87 1.6 191S 5,303 195 3.7 1914 5.108 381 7.5 1913 4,727 Missing Page j2 Compulsory School Attendance County Harford Howard ivent Montgomery Prince George Queen Anne's St iNIarv's Somerset Talbot Increase Per Cent. Average over of increase Year attendance preceding over for year year preceding year 1917 3,936 95 2.4 1916 3,841 41 1.1 191S 3,800 41 1.1 1914 3,759 97 2.6 1913 3,662 1917 2,497 273 11.4 1916 2,224 222 10.0 1915 2,002 168 8.4 1914 1,834 —132 —7.2 1913 1,966 1917 2,585 276 10.7 1916 2,309 —95 —4.1 1915 2,404 131 5.5 1914 2.273 —26 —1.1 1913 2,299 1917 4,326 —195 -^.5 1916 4,521 81 1.8 1915. 4,440 39 0.9 1914 4,401 195 4.5 1913 4,206 1917 5,886 36 6.1 1916 5,525 53 1.0 1915 5,472 389 7.1 1914 5,083 207 4.1 1913 4,876 s. 1917 2,463 188 7.6 1916 2,275 —140 -6.2 1915 2,415 199 8.3 1914 2.216 58 2.6 1913 2,158 1917 2,488 454 18.3 1916 2,034 —16 . —.8 1915 2,050 28 1.4 1914 2,022 —25 —1.2 1913 2,047 1917 4,211 455 10.8 1916 3,756 168 4.5 1915 3,588 245 6.9 1914 3,343 —99 -3.0 1913 3,442 1917 3,094 248 8.0 1916 2,846 -^1 —1.4 1915 2,887 50 1.7 1914 2,837 —18 —.6 1913 2,855 Missing Page Missing Page Missing Page Missing Page Maryland Public Schools 17 dustrial conditions produced by the war was also felt in all counties. Several counties reported some interesting special feature in reply to question No. 7, but very few suggestions were received for amend- ing the law, in response to question No. 8. The replies to questions Nos. 9, 10, and 11 are summarized in the foregoing table. It would seem that the variation ;n the distribution of the attendance officer's time between office and field work is hardly justifiable. In some counties the attendance officer should have spent more days in the field and visited more homes of absent children. The attendance officers who got into more homes and studied more cases at first hand developed more school sentiment and usually secured better results in enforcing the law. It is probable that inadequate means of travel, and in some counties poor roads, tended to limit the amount of traveling. The replies are of so much interest that most of them are printed in full. Each county being left during the year to meet its attend- ance problems largely in its own way, the reports show considerable variation in the methods used, as well as in the results obtained. The reader will be interested in comparing the following accounts by counties with the statistical tables of school attendance : ALLEGANY COUNTY. lOyrs. 11 yrs. 12yrs. 13yrs. 14yrs. ISyrs. 16yrs 17yrs. 1. 48 19 10 1 1 1 12 yrs. 13 yrs. 14 yrs. IS yrs. 16 yrs. 17 yrs. 2. Attending 100 days 897 862 734 370 202 92 Less than 100 days 128 116 145 87 37 IS The great majority of the pupils enumerated above who have not attended the full 100 days were boys in the rural schools, who stopped to work on their farms. Just about that time the papers began to surmise that the Legislature would possibly permit boys to work on the farms, so I found it very difficult to compel them to attend without using the drastic features of the law, and did not feel this action was advisable at that time. 3. We had about SO pupils and their parents brought before the Juvenile Court, and the magistrates of the county, who, after interpreting the law, allowed them to go on a promise that they would attend school regularly. This was done without any cost to the parents or the county, and in most cases was very effective. 4. We have done some special relief work, such as arranging through the local Charity Boards and individuals for funds to secure clothing and shoes. We also succeeded in getting friends to assist us in furnishing clothing and shoes for a few children whose parents could not afford to buy them, these cases occurring in places that had no local Charity Boards. 5. I have done considerable work among the patrons of the schools, have attended a number of public meetings, and have visited a great many lodges, in 18 Compulsory School Attendance every instance urging upon parents the necessity of complying with the law. 6. The chief difficulty I find is the indifference of the parents and guardians about the education of their children. 7. Whatever success I have had has been due, in my judgment, to the fact that I have been able to make the boys who have beefl violating the law feel that I was their friend. I thereby gained their confidence, an