PA CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY PA6518.N6L7r"'™""'"-"'"''' Nonius Marcellus' dictionary of Repubiic 3 1924 008 300 919 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924008300919 NONIUS MARCELLUS' DICTIONARY OF REPUBLICAN LATIN. BY W. M. LINDSAY, M.A. Professor of Humanity in the University of St. Andrews. OXFORD : Ifam^a IPark^r antr ©o. 27 BROAD STREET; AND 3I BEDFORD STREET, STRAND, LONDON. I9OI. H(.Li4- A.^l\^'5-'^^ NONIUS MARCELLUS' DICTIONARY OF REPUBLICAN LATIN. i. The ^ De Cotnpendiosa Dodrina.' Of the three large Latin Dictionaries or Encyclopaedias which have been transmitted from ancient to modern times, (i) Festus' Epitome of Verrius Flaccus ' De Verborum Significatu,' (2) Nonius Marcellus ' de Compendiosa Doctrina,' (3) the ' Etymologiae ' of Isidore, the second excels in its wealth of quotations from the literature of the Republic. Most of what has been preserved of the lost Republican writers, such as Accius the tragedian, Lucilius the satirist, Sisenna the historian, we owe to the quotations with which Nonius has illustrated the words of his Dictionary. Of Nonius himself little is known. From various indications it has been inferred that he lived in the fourth or fifth century A.D., and was a dignitary in the small town of Thubursicum in North Africa. He published a volume of letters ' On the Neglect of Study,' from which he quotes a pompous sentence in illustration of the word meridies^ (page 451 of Mercier's edition). Some of his modern critics accuse him of an amount of ignorance that is hardly conceivable ^. Without going so far, we may safely regard him as a man of very limited learning, a compiler rather than a researcher. His dictionary can hardly have belonged to any- thing but the ' scissors and paste ' class. In accordance with the fashion which regulated Latin lexico- graphical works °, Nonius divided his ' De Compendiosa Doc- ^ Meridiem . . . nos in Epistulis quae inscribuntur ' De Peregrinando a Doc- trinis ' : "exvigila igitur aliquando et moracium cogitationum, priusquam aetas in meridie est, torpedinem pelle." '' Because he quotes from some works of Cicero under the name ' M. Tullius ' and from others under the name ' Cicero,' he has been charged with the absurd error of supposing 'M. Tullius' and 'Cicero' to be two different persons (Riese, '.Symbol. Bonnens.' p. 484«.). This charge is surely unfair. Nonius is merely reproducing with mechanical fidelity the title-headings of the editions which he used, ° The ' Noctes Atticae ' of Aulus Gellius, a series of gossiping disquisitions B 2 Nonius Marcellus' trina ' into twenty books. The materials which he had collected did not lend themselves readily to this division, so that the books are awkwardly uneven in size. Book IV, the part which most exactly corresponds to the modern notion of a dictionary, is slightly larger than Books I and II together, and a good de^l larger than the remainder of the work. The arrangement of the words in the several books is not alphabetical. Books II, III, and IV are indeed in our MSS. broken up into alphabetical sections, the first section comprising words beginning with the letter A, the second words beginning with B, and so on, yet the words comprised in each section do not follow the alphabetical order; and it is possible that these books owe even this slightly alphabetical arrangement to a mediaeval editor. On the contrary. Nonius seems to have set down the words in his pages in the same order as he took them from his various sources. Almost at the beginning of Book I, for example, comes a series of words taken from the Comedies of Plautus : hostimentum from the Asinaria, V. 172, tolutim from v. 706 of the same play, capulum from v. 892, temulenta from the Aulularia, v. 355, cinaedi from v. 422 of the same play, and so on. When the Plautus-series is finished, a series of words from Lucretius follows : austra from Lucr. V, 515, veterina from Lucr. V, 862, crepera from Lucr. V, 1294, etc. This arrangement has often been remarked by writers on Nonius '', and is indeed so patent as to be beyond possibility of doubt. But whether owing to incompleteness of treatment ", or defectiveness of method' on the part of these writers, the full significance of this arrangement has not been presented with adequate result, and neither the recent editions of lost Republican writings, such as Ribbeck's 'Fragments of Roman Dramatic Poetry,' nor the last edition of Nonius' Dictionary (by Lucian Mueller, Leipzig [Teub- ner], 1888) are sufficiently regulated by the knowledge that can on various points of lexicographical, literary and historical interest, and the ' Etymologiae ' of Isidore, are likewise divided into twenty books. So were some other works of this description that have not been preserved. ■J Especially by A. Schottmiiller ' Die Bestandtheile des ersten Capitels des Nonius' (in 'Symbol. Bonnens.' pp. 807— 832), and P. Schmidt ' De Nonii Marcelli auctoribus grammaticis,' Leipzig (Teubner), i858. " Schottmiiller has treated only the first book of Nonius. ' Schmidt attempted, but without success, to refer to ancient commentaries on Plautus and other authors Nonius' account of words taken from these authors. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 3 be gained from a close study of Nonius' manner of compi- lation. If we can satisfy ourselves that we really possess the key to the composition of the ' De Compendiosa Doctrina,' the benefit td the textual criticism of Nonius will, of course, be enormous. But there will be another benefit of greater importance and reach- ing a wider circle of students. It is from the ' De Compendiosa Doctrina' that most of the fragments of the lost Republican literature come. No editor of these fragments has yet found any certain plan of arranging them in proper order. All that an editor could do hitherto, in arranging, let us say, the fragments of a tragedy of Accius or of the History of Sisenna, was to guess from the nature of each passage the incident to which it referred, and roughly assign to it this or that place in the sequence. But if it can be established that Nonius' quotations from authors, whose whole works we possess, follow a definite and unvarying order in his pages, corresponding to the order in which the passages quoted occur in these authors' works, we may surely infer ' from the known to the unknown ' that his citations from these lost authors observe a similar sequence. We thus get a clue to the place occupied by each passage quoted from Accius or Sisenna in the particular tragedy or book of history in which Nonius found it. The theory which I hope to establish in the following pages is briefly this, that Nonius collected the materials for the twenty books of his Dictionary partly from Glossaries or lexicographical works (e.g. the ' Noctes Atticae ' of Aulus Gellius), partly from texts, apparently annotated texts, of certain authors (Plautus, Lucretius, Accius, Sisenna, Cicero, etc.) ; further, a point of main importance, that the order in which each item appears in each book is also the order in which it appeared in the pages of the authors used. Nonius evolved each book in the same mechanical fashion. He went through the lists of notable words compiled by him from the various sources which he used, Gellius' ' Noctes Atticae,' Plautus, Lucretius, etc., and selected from these lists the words suitable for the purpose of this particular book, setting them down in the order in which they came to hand. In Book I, for example, he took from his Gellius-Hst the three items (or 'lemmas,' as they are technically called), infestus (from Gell. IX, 12), maturare (from Gell. X, 11), lictor (from Gell. XII, 3), etc.; from B 2 4 Nonius Marcellus' the list extracted from Cicero ' de Officiis' he took stigmatias (Off. II, 2S), reserare{Oi(. II, 55), etc. : and these items or lemmas appear in his pages in the order in which they occur in the pages of the author from whom he culled them, that is to say, in the order in which he had entered them in his rough lists. When he found in this or that list a word which he remembered to have already entered from a previous list, extracted from another author who had been used by him earlier in the book, he added to the quotation, with which the lemma was already provided, the new quotation supplied by the new source. For in- stance, from his list excerpted from Cicero ' de Republica ' he had entered the •word portitores (p. 24 M.) with the sentence of Cicero in vvhich it occurred, and with a parallel passage, supplied, I fancy, by a marginal note in his copy of Cicero, from the Menaechmi of Plautus. Later, when going through his ' De Officiis ' list, he appears to have found the same word, and, turning back to the lemma ' portitores,' to have appended the quotation from Off. I, 150 to the Plautus- quotation. A perusal of the following pages will, I hope, produce conviction that this is no mere possible or probable account of Nonius' method of procedure in the composition of his twenty books of the ' De Compendiosa Doctrina,' but is the statement of what actually occurred. It is quite in keeping with what we know of ancient glossaries, which often shew 'author-sequences' of words, that is a batch of words taken from one author followed by a batch of words taken from another author. In parts of Festus' epitome of the great dictionary of Verrius Flaccus we can see Cato- sequences, followed by Plautus-sequences, and so on, though in other parts an alphabetic order (by AB — or ABC — ) is followed ^, But before I can hope to demonstrate the mechanical regularity with which Nonius has followed this method of compilation, there are strong i priori objections to be overcome. Is it likely, one asks oneself, that in the twentieth century there should be a possibility of following with precision each step taken by a lexico- grapher of the fourth century in compiling his dictionary, of getting a sight of him, so to speak, in his study, as he took up his rough lists of materials, one by one, and entered the items from them on his pages? Are there not a thousand chances of his having e See Reitzenstein ' Verrianische Forschungen ' (vol. I of Breslauer Philolo- gische Abhandlungen), Breslau, 1887. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 5 departed from an order of procedure so repellently mechanical? Would he not be likely to bring words culled from one list into proximity with words, cognate in meaning or in form, which he had taken from another list? Even if his first draft of a book had been prepared in this inert fashion, would he not, before committing it to the criticism of others, have taken pains effectually to conceal all traces of its composition ? The only way of overcoming these very natural objections is to present in all completeness the actual facts, to give an analysis of the 'De Compendiosa Doctrina,' book by book'', exhibiting the words in the order in which Nonius has placed them, and stating the source from which each batch of words has come. Before the reader has gone very far he will be surprised with the precision with which the method I have mentioned has been followed, and will find that the batches of words from the various authors follow each other with so monotonous regularity that after one citation he can guess with a degree of accuracy what author or what book of what author will be cited next. When he has finished, he will, I trust, have no doubt that the arrangement of the words in this ancient dictionary followed a method that is clearly recognizable to-day. The only question will be to what extent any deviation from the normal procedure ever actually occurred. This mechanical regularity is not inconsistent with what we can infer of Nonius' type of mind. We can see from his use of Aulus Gellius' how little trouble he gave himself with the com- pilation of his materials ; and various defects in composition, such as the recurrence of identical lemmas'' in the same book, shew us that his Dictionary was not revised by the author before pubhcation. For surely the correction of- repetitions like these would be the first result of any revision. There is indeed one form of departure from the normal arrangement that occasionally 1> Books II— IV, owing to the suspicion that they incur of re-editing (see above, p. 2), must, for the present, be omitted. i See M. Hertz ' Opuscula Gelliana,' pp. 85 sqq., a revised and improved version of his earlier treatise on the subject. is If Nonius forgot that a word which he [found in one of his lists had already been entered by him in his Dictionary from a previous list, the result was a recurrence of the identical lemma. An example in Book I is occatio (42. 1 1 and 61. 24). 6 Nonius Marceilus' shews itself, but it is of a nature to confirm, rather than to weaken, the impression of Nonius' mechanical method of work. Now and then an extra-quotation supplied from a later list, which exhibited a word that had been already entered from an earlier list, has brought in its train a lemma or two taken from the later list. Nonius, after entering the extra-quotation, went on mechanically copying what was before him, instead of turning to the right page. (For examples, see the following analysis.) Transpositions of this kind (they are very rare) are clearly due to Nonius himself. For others, we have to balance the possibility of Nonius having departed from his normal procedure against the possibility of a corruption in the text. Our MSS. of Nonius come, all of them, from one archetype, an archetype written apparently in minuscule script ', and therefore of no great antiquity. If it did not abound in transpositions, insertions, and omissions, it would be strangely unlike the other MSS. of its time ; for the 'Compendiosa Doctrina,' being in dictionary form, offers unusual temptation to a scribe to overlook a lemma or to take it in its wrong order of sequence. We know of one loose leaf in this archetype (containing 406, 12 — 409, 15) which was wrongly inserted after the first leaf (ending with 3, 13) of the whole MS., and which our extant MSS. have all copied in its wrong place. They have also added errors of their own, not merely in the form of miscopyings and omissions, but in the more harmful form of insertions. Nonius' work was the Latin Dictionary of many a monastic library ; and a studious abbot would have no scruple in adding in the margin or at the end of a chapter some word which he found in another part of the work. We can detect these errors by the help of e>?tant MSS. which do not share them. But if similar liberties were taken with our archetype (and we have every reason to suppose that they were), the corrupt readings are of necessity reproduced in all MSS. of our author. Now and then these intruding quotations bear upon them evidence of their own spuriousness. For instance, we find in all our MSS. at 520, 15, under the lemma lateres, after a quotation from Varro, Vit. Pop. Rom. Ill, this insertion : et in alio idem ' later quod conquadravit regius.' Here the phrase ' et in alio idem ' convicts the entry of spuriousness, for it is not one of Nonius' phrases. ' See Philologus, Iv, 168. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 7 The quotation occurs in proper form in another part of the Compendiosa Doctrina, viz. 131, 10, where the same word, later, is discussed, and has clearly been inserted at 520, 15, at some later time. Again, when we find in Book I (a book concerned with the use of words in their literal sense) a quite unsuitable extra- quotation in the lemma privus, and on turning to Book II (a book dealing with peculiar uses of words) find the same quotation suitably used to illustrate a peculiar sense oi privus, we can hardly doubt that some reader, possessed of that proverbially dangerous thing, a 'little knowledge,' had noticed the quotation in Book II and entered it in the margin at the place where the same lemma stood in Book I. ii. The sources of Nonius^ rough lists of words. I . A glossary, taken mainly from the plays of Titinius and other RepubUcan Dramatists (including Plautus) ; also from Varro. The symbol for it in my Analysis of Contents will be Gloss, i. z. The 2 1 ' Varronian ' plays of Plautus in this order ■" ; Amphi- truo, Asinaria, Aulularia, Bacchides, Vidularia, Cistellaria, Casina, Captivi, Curculio, Epidicus, Miles Gloriosus, Menaechmi, Mercator, Mostellaria, Persa, Pseudolus, Poenulus, Rudens, Stichus, Tri- nummus, Truculentus. The symbol for this Ust will be Plautus i. 3. Lucretius, all. 4. The Lycurgus of Naevius. Symbol, Naev. Lye. 5. A volume of Accius, containing the Eurysaces, ' Erisaces,' Armorum Judicium, Astyanax, Oenomaus, Tereus, Alphesiboea, Amphitryo, Melanippus, Epinausimache, Pelopidae, Phoenissae, Medea, Philoctetes, Alcmeo and Telephus, in this order or some- thing like it. Symbol, Accius i. 6. Pomponius, the volume containing the P-plays : Pictores, Prostibulum, Pannuceati, Pappus agricola, Piscatores, Pistor, Praeco posterior, fairly in this order ; possibly also the Petitor and Porcus. 7. Novius, a volume containing apparently these plays (order very uncertain) : Fullones feriati, Paedium, Agricola, Zona ; also perhaps the Decuma, Galhnaria, Ficitor, Tabellaria, Sanniones, m The relative positions of Merc, and Most, are quite uncertain. For details of the arrangement of the several works of Plautus and the other authors used by Nonius, see the Appendix. $ Nonius MarctUu^ Maccus, Maccus exul, Milites Pometinenses, Pappus praeteritus, Praeco posterior, ' Eurysaces.' 8. A second volume of Accius, containing (more or less in this order) : Epigoni, Meleager, Aeneadae aut Decius, Stasiastae vel Tropaeum Liberi, Athamas, Clytaemestra, Bacchae, Neoptole- mus, Erigona, Nyctegresia, Andromeda, Atreus, Phinidae, Aga- memnonidae. Symbol, Accius ii. (The Antigona, and possibly the Chrysippus, were included either in this volume or in the other.) 9. Lucilius' Satires, Books I — XX. The title ' Saturae ' is always cited in this series. Symbol, " Lucilius i." 10. Ennius, a volume containing the Hectoris Lytra and Telephus (in this order) ; possibly also others of his tragedies. 11. Turpilius, a volume with these plays, in this order: Boethuntes, Demetrius, Canephorus, Demiurgus, Epiclerus, Thrasy- leo, Paedium, Philopator, Leucadia, Lindia, Lemniae, Paraterusa, Hetaera. 12. Pacuvius, these four plays, in this order : Atalanta, Peri- boea, Dulorestes, Hermiona ; possibly also the Iliona and Medus. 13. Cicero de RepubUca. The title of this volume gave the author's name as ' M. Tullius,' not as ' Cicero.' Symbol, Cicero i. (?) 14. A Glossary (?). Symbol, "Gloss, ii." 15. A volume of Varro's Menippean Satires, containing those whose Latin titles began with P, or whose Greek titles began with TTtpi: (l) Elpev f) \o7ras to irajia, irepl yeyafirjuoToiv, (2) "E;(o> o-f, Trepi ruxijs, (3) TlepX c^ayayTJs, (4) Mutuum muli SCabunt, rrcpl i/^-mpto-zioi), (5) 'AyBpaTioiroXis, rrepi yevt&KiaKrjs, (6) MarcOpoUs, jrepi dpx^s, (7) Cygnus, jrepi Ta(l>fis, (8) Sciamachia, nepl riitfiov, (9) Synephebus, Trepi ipfiovris, (lo) To eVl TJi ipaKji pipov, wepl evKmplas, (ll) 'aXX' ou /xevfir, Trepi (piXapyvpias, (12) Papia papae, nepl eyKiopicov, (13) Pseu- dulus Apollo, irepi Sfav Siayvairems, (14) CosmotOryne, mpl (jiBopas Kotrpov, (15) Gloria, mpt (pOomv, (i6) Flaxtabula, rrepl eVapx'Si/, (17) Testamentum, ircpl StaeriKav, (18) 'EKarop^r], nfp\ BvtriSiv, (19) Periplus I, Periplus II, wspi i^iXoo-oc^ias, (20) Octogesis, wcpi vopia-pd- TpS>v, (23) Desultorius, ■nepi roi ypaffyeif, (24) Devicti, nepl (jaXoviKias, (25) Prome- theus Liber, (26) wepi Kepavmv, (27) Tithonus, mpl yrjpms, (28) Est modus matulae, irepl pt6r)s, (29) Epitaphiones, Trtpi Td(j>a>v, (30) Triho- dites Tripylius, irepi dper^s KTriaias, and possibly others, e.g. nepi alpiatav and Vinalia, mpX dcfipobitrlav. Symbol, Varro i. Dictionary of Repubticati Latin. 9 16. Cicero (styled ' M. Tullius') de Deorum Natura, Book II. Symbol, Cicero ii. ? 17. A third volume of Accius, fcontaining the Myrmidones and Diomedes. Symbol, Accius iii. 18. Sallust : Jugurtha (with title 'J ugurthae bellum,' or merely ' Jugurtha '), Histories (with title ' Historiae '), and Catiline (with title ' Catilinae bellum '), in this order. 19. Afranius, a volume containing the Vopiscus, Privignus, Fratriae and Exceptus, in this order ; possibly also the Divortium and Suspecta. 20. Cicero (styled ' M. Tullius') de Officiis, Book I. Symbol, Cicero iii. 21. The Danae of Naevius. Symbol, Naev. Dan. 22. Virgil. 23. Terence. 24. A volume of Cicero (styled ' M. Tullius '), containing the letters 'ad Caesarem iuniorem' (with this forai of title), followed by the Verrine and Philippic orations. Symbol, Cicero iv. 25. Lucilius Satires, Books XXVI. — XXX. Curiously enough, the list compiled from these books began with Book XXX and ended with Book XXVI, presumably because Nonius had begun his task of excerpting with the last book of the Satires. The title ' Saturae ' is never cited in this series. Symbol, Lucilius ii. 26. A Glossary (?). Symbol, Gloss, iii. 27. A Glossary of Verbs arranged in strict alphabetical order. Symbol, Alph. Verb. 28. A Glossary of Adverbs, arranged in strict alphabetical order. Symbol, Alph. Adverb. 29. A volume of Cicero (styled ' M. Tullius'), containing: de Officiis II — III, Hortensius, de Senectute, in this order. Symbol, Cicero v. 30. A volume of Plautus, with the A-plays : Amphitruo, Asinaria, Aulularia, in this order. Symbol, Plautus ii. 31. A second volume of Varro's Menippean Satires, containing these Satires, in this order : Marcipor, Andabatae, Lex Maenia, Mysteria, Agatho, Quinquatrus, Endymiones, Virgula divina, Gerontodidascalus, Parmeno, Hercules tuam fidem, Meleagri, Tac/))) MeKiTTTTov, Sesqueulixes, Hercules Socraticus, Sexagesis, Vvu>6i ueavrov, Eumenides. Symbol, Varro ii. 32. Gellius Noctes Atticae. ta Nonius Marcellus' 33. A third volume of Varro's Menippean Satires, with the Bimarcus, Manius, Modius, "Okos \ipas, in this order. Symbol, Varro iii. 34. Cicero (styled 'M. TuUius') de Finibus. Symbol, Cicero vi. 3SA. The first part of a Glossary (?), mainly from Varro, not alphabetical. This first part included Varro's Epistles. Symbol, Gloss, iv. 36. Sisenna, Historiae, Bks. Ill, IV. 3SB. The second part of the Varro-Glossary (?) mentioned above. This second part included Varro Rerum Humanarum lib. XX. Symbol, Gloss, iv. 37. Cicero (styled 'Cicero') Orator and de Oratore (in this order). Symbol, Cicero vii. 38A. Part of a Glossary in rough alphabetical order. Symbol, Gloss. V. 39. Cicero (styled ' Cicero ') Academica and Tusculanae dis- putationes (in this order). Symbol, Cicero viii. 40. Varro de Re Rustica, Bk. I. Symbol, Varro iv. 38B. The other part of the Glossary in rough alphabetical order. Symbol, Gloss, v. 41. Varro (i) de Vita popuH Romani, (2) Catus vel de liberis educandis (in this order). Symbol, Varro v, iii. Analysis of Contents'^ of the ' Compend. Docir.', Books I, V—XX. Book I, de Proprietate Sermonum, i.e. the Etymology of Words, and Words used in the older literature in their etymological sense. Gloss, i. I senium Titin. Velit., Nov. Gallin., (?)Caecil.Ephes. (aetas mala Plaut. Men. 756 ; bona aetas M. Tull. Sen.) 3 velitatio Plaut. Asin. 307 " I give the lemmas of each book of the ' Compendiosa Doctrina,' arranged in their order of sequence. After each lemma I give the reference to the passage of the author from which Nonius obtained it ; but, for the sake of saving space, I omit the references to the extra-quotations. The quotation that stands first in Nonius' paragraph is almost invariably the source from wfhich the lemma came. Where however this practice is departed from, or where there is any reasonable doubt about the exact source, I give more than one reference. In the case of Glossaries all the quotations cited in the Glossary are given. At the head of each batch of lemmas I indicate by means of the symbols, already explained, the rough list from which Nonius took them. The numbers on the left give Mercier's paging. Dictionary of Republican Latin. II phrygiones Titin. Barbat. lurcones Plaut. Pers. 421 Virg. Aen. IX concenturiare Plaut. Pseud. finitores Plaut. Poen. 48 Plautus i. passum [Plaut. Stich. hostimentum Plaut. Asin. 1 7 2, 369] Poen. 312 377 Plaut. Asin. 706 12 expes' Ace. Eurys. 4 tolutim exules ' Virg. G. Ill capulum Plaut. Asin. 892 vestispici Plaut. Trin. 5 temulenta Plaut. Aul. 355 suppilare Plaut. True. cinaedi Plaut. Aul. 422 6 exercitus Sail." Jugurt. Lucretius. bell. 71, Plaut. 13 austra Lucr. V 516 Bacch. (frag.) veterina Lucr. V 865 tenus Plaut. Bacch. crepera Lucr. V 1296 792 14 Avernus Lucr. VI 740 inlicire »• Naev. Lycurg. pelices (quotation, pro- Naev . Lye. bably Plaut. vitulantes Naev. Lycurg. Cist. 37, omit- ted) Accius i. calvitur Plaut. Gas. 169 extorris Ace. Eurys. 7 frigere Plaut. Gas. 267 15 enoda Ace. Eurys. defloccare Plaut. Gas. 967 grummus Ace. Oenom. depexum 1 Ter. Heaut. torrus Ace. Melan. sartores Plaut. Gapt. 16 expectorare Ace. Phoen. 8 nautea Plaut. Gurc. 99 extispices Ace. Medea tricae Plaut. Cure. 613 lactare Ace. Medea caperrare Plaut. Epid. succussare Ace. Philoet. 9 examussim Plaut. Men. 50 (amussim, Pomponius. Amph. 843 ; 17 strena Pomp. Pietores emussitata, Mil. adulatio M. Tull. Deor. 632) Nat. II mutus ' Naev. Lycurg. manducones Pomp. Pietores dispennere Plaut. Mil. 1407 senica Pomp. Pietores 10 focula Plaut. Pers. 104 gradarius Lueil.Sat.XIV bardum Plaut. Pers. 169 exdorsuare " Plaut. Aul. 398 inlexetexlex^Plaut. Pers. 407 1 18 delirare Pomp. Prostib. " Inserted from 295. 5? P Either from a note on ienus or from Plaut. Bacch. 1151. 1 From a note on defloccare. Cf. 62. 23 ' delibratum,' decorticatum, ut ' dear- tuatum,' per artus discissum. ■^ From a note on examussim (cf. Paul. Fest. 54 Th. quidam ' amusshn' esse dicunt non tacite, quod muttire interdum dicitur loqui) or possibly from Plaut. Mil. 664 mutum mare. ' The proper place of the lemma toralium, which the MSS. wrongly insert in the middle of this lemma is uncertain. Possibly it belongs to the ' Gloss, i ' series. Cf. 537. 19. * These two lemmas should, I fancy, stand beside extorris (p. 14 M.). ™ Perhaps inserted from 95. 12. u Nonius Marcellus^ centuriatim Pomp. Prostib. rumen Pomp. Prostib. rudus Lucil. Sat. XI rutrum Pomp. Pannuc. nebulones Pomp. Pannuc. 19 truam Pomp. Pannuc. evannetur Pomp. Pannuc. vafrum Pomp. Praec. Post. 20 particulones Pomp. Praec. Post. Novius (this list in Book I has supplied only extra-quota- tions, e.g. to the lemma tolutim, p. 4 M. See section v.) Accius ii. clepere Ace. Epig. corporare Enn. Androm., Ace. Stas. vel Trop. circus Ace. Androm. medicina Ace. Phin. Lucilius i. Lucil. Sat. Ill Virg. VIII ^ Lucil. Sat. Ill Lucil. Sat. VI Lucil. Sat. VII Lucil. Sat. VII Lucil. Sat. VII Lucil. Sat. XV Turpil. Philop., Ace. Aeneadae Lucil. Sat. XV Lucil. Sat. XI Ennius (only extra -quota- tions, e.g. to enoda, p. 15). cernuus 21 stricturae quiritare caries virosae 2 2 capronae cerebrosi gliscit prostomis tricones *" Turpilius. sagae Lucil. Sat. VII, Turpil. Boeth. 23 lapit moenes Pacuvius. Pacuv. Perib. Pacuv. Dulor. Cicero i. 24 25 petulantia procacitas Kalendarum consulura et praetorum ignominia fidei portitores seditionis M.Tull.Rep.IV M.Tull.Rep.IV Varro V.P.R. I VarroV.P.R II M.Tull.Rep.IV M.Tull.Rep.IV M.Tull.Rep.IV M.TulLRep.VI Gloss, ii. 26 hamiotas valgum vatax catax silones bronci eompernes vari Varro Bimarc. Nov. Mil. Po- met. Lucil. XXVIII Lucil. Sat. II Varro Tva>6i ae Lucil. Sat. Ill Lucil. Sat.XVII Lucil. Sat.XVII Varro i. lingulacae Varr. Pap. pap. Varr. Pap. pap. Cic. Tusc. Ill Varr. Pap. pap. Varr. Flaxt. rabulae ebullire ^ rapones 27 strabones extermina tum* exodium putus Lucil. XXIX Varr. He cat. Plaut. Pseud. 989, Varr. He- eat. Varr. Prom. Varr. mp\ Kep. Varr. Est Mod. Accius iii (not 28 compedes fulgura coagulum Cicero ii, used). Sallust (only extra-quota- tions, e.g. to calvitur, p. 6 M.). ' Possibly inserted from 524. 2. 1 Possibly inserted from 338. 10. ^ From note on rabulae^ Varr. Papj pap. ? " From note on exodium Varr. HeCat. ? ' Dictionary of Republican Latin. 13 Afranius. mulierosi Afran. Vopisc. flagriones Afran. Vopisc. edulia Afran. Privign. merenda Afran. Fratr. Cicero iii. 29 pedetemp- M. Tull. Off. I tim calces '' subligaclum mediocritas 30 modestiam 120 Virg. V M. Tull. Off. I 129 M. Tull. Off. I 130 M. Tull. Off. I 142 Naev. Dan. (not used). Virgil. antes Virg. G. II camurum Virg. G. III. 55 immune Virg. G. IV dirum^ Virg. G. Ill 468 exordium Virg. A. IV 284 inops Virg. VIII 100 Terence. 31 defrudare Ter. Pliorm. 44 sudum"* inritare ablegare 32 arcanum ° tormines monumenti ri vales gestire involare 33 propinare Virg. VIII 529 Lucil. Sat. I, Ter.Phorm.932 Ter. Hec. 414 Virg. A. IV 422 Cic. Tusc. II M. Tull. ad Caes. Epist. II f Ter. Eun. 353 Ter. Eun. 558 Ter. Eun. 648 Ter. Eun. 1087 [pedetemp- tim Cic. Verrinae actio I] Cicero iv. insulsum ignavum calamito- sum serium 34 interpolare everriculum divaricari vacillare M. Tull. ad Caes. iun. Epist. II Virg. G. IV 168, III. 428, M. Tull. ad Caes. iun. II M.Tull.Verrin. Divinat. Afran. Privign. M.TulLinVerr. act. II (II, i) M. TulI.Verrin. V de signis (II, iv, S3) M. Tull. de sig- nis (Verr. II, iv, 86) M. Tull. Phil. Ill Lucilius ii. praestrin- gere'' 35 angina arquatus privum nugator foramina ' discernicu- lum fratrum 36 subplantare coniungere fenestrae ^ emungi Plaut.Mil.glor., Lucil. XXX Lucil. XXX ? (Lucil. XXX) Lucil. XXX Lucil. XXX Cic. Tusc. I 47 Lucil. XXX Nigidius Lucil. XXIX Lucil. XXIX Cic. Tusc. I 46 Lucil. XXIX !> Possibly inserted from 415. 2; 257. 51 ; 406. 35. '^ That this lemma originally preceded the lemma immune is suggested by the apparently designed alphabetical order of these Virgil-lemmas. ^ This and the preceding lemma have, I fancy, been transposed. « Possibly taken from a note on Ter. Hec. 431 in arcem. Cf. Paul. Fest. 12. 5 Arcani sermonis significatio trahitur ab arce, etc. ' See p. 9, above. i Possibly inserted from 460. 6 ; 386. 38. li Possibly belongs to preceding series. Cf. 373. 26. ' a. fenestrae, below. ^ Cf. foramina, above. Are both lemmas the result of one marginal insertion ? 14 Nonius Marcellus' adglomerare coUare depilati excuriari pensum 37 aqua intercus maltas monogram- mi portorium impertire sedulum scripturarios 38 versipelles conbibones capital clandestino idiotas expirare Virg. Aen. II Lucil. XXIX Lucil. XXIX Varr. Hippoc. Lucil. XXVIII Lucil. XXVIII Lucil. XXVII Lucil. II, XXVII Lucil. XXVII Lucil. XXVII Lucil. XXVII Lucil. XXVI Lucil. XXVI Lucil. XXVI Plaut. Men., Lucil. XXVI Lucil. XXVI Lucil. XXVI Lucil. Ill', XXVI. Gloss, iii (Alph. Verb. ?) eliminare 39 mcoxare condepsere vituperare (vitiodare?)Ter. Andr, Pacuv. Dulor, Pomp. Concha, Enn. Med. ex.. Ace. Meleag. Pomp. Pann. Pomp. Nupt. Alph. Verb. ordire pilare populare 40 rabere supersedere Ace. Amph., Afran. Susp. Afran. Comp., Nov. Exod. Pacuv. Chrys., Ter. Phorm. Varro Idem Atti, Caecil. Hyp. Rostr. Turpil. Paed., Plaut. Epid. titinnire Afran. Vopisc, Nigidius XVIII verminari Pomp. Him. Papp. Alph. canatim cossim infabre saepiunt™ Adverb. NigidiusComm. Gramm. Pomp. Pore. Pac. Niptr. Afran. Matert. Cicero v. stigmatias reserare abundare tergiversari prudentiam 42 adpendix convivii occationem coagmenta verniliter " pecuniosi et locupletes 43 viritim ° Off. Off. M. Tull. II 25 M. Tull. II 55 Virg. G. IV M.Tull. Off. Ill M. Tull. Hort. M. Tull. Hort. M.Tull. Sen. 45 M.Tull. Sen. 5 1 M.Tull. Sen. 72 Caecil. Fenerat. M. Tull. Rep. II 16 M. Tull. Rep. II 26 Plautus ii. coneinnare paupertas 44 pandere blatis percontari prodigia Plaut. Amph. 179 Plaut. Amph. 529 Varro V.P.R. I Varro V.P.R. I Plaut. Amph. 626 Plaut. 7 10 Plaut. 739 Amph. Amph. 1 Possibly inserted from 279. 35. m Probably from a discussion of the Adverb saepi. " These lemmas look like the conclusion of the Alph. Adverb, series above. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 15 cerriti calcitrones 45 votitum verberare cassum croccitum sublevit investes Plaut. Amph. (frag.) Plaut. Asin. 391 Plaut. Asin. 789 Plaut. Aul. 42 Plaut. Aul. 191 Plaut. Aul. 625 Plaut. Aul. 667 Virg. A. VIII Varro ii. inferum 46 Syrus evirare ludibria febris vulpinari sufflatum vespertilio 47 exporrectum iugatum prodius granaria torculum cingillum Tutilina Tutanus 48 silicemium suffundatum edones elixum parochos 49 Trossuli proboscis cetari tonimus dierecti praesepia 50 subrigere lingulacae Varr. Marcip. Varr. Marcip. Varr. Marcip. Virg. VI 74 Varr. Andab. Varr. Myst. Varr. Agath. Varr. Agath. Varr. Endym. Cic.Tusc.IIIi7 Varr. Virg. Div. Varr. Gerontod. Varr. Gerontod. Varr. Gerontod. Varr. Here. t. f. Varr. Here. t. f. Ter. Adelph., Varr. Meleag. Varr. Ta^. Men. Varr. Ta<^. Men. Varr. Ta^. Men. Varr. Sesqueul. Varr. Sesqueul. Varr. Sexag. Varr. VvSi6l Cf. iii. 35 %.s . famulanter . " Inserted from 302. 10 ? Dictionary of Republican Latin. 23 465 grundire insania elegantes amarus Caecil., Laber. Sedig., Claud. Ann. XVI Virg. Buc. IX M.Tull.inClod. et Cur., Cato Carm. de Mor. Virg. A. X Varro v. multitudo Varr. V.P.R.II sanguinu- lentus Varr.V.P.R.IV 466 pondus Varr.V.P.R.IV carere " Turpil. Demetr. audiendum Virg. G. I cavus lavare ^ animae ' Virg. A. VIP X636 Virg. G. Ill, A. X 727, etc. Virg. A. XI 24 Book VII, De Contrariis Generibus Verborum, i.e. Abnormal Verb-forms. (i) Active Voice Section. Gloss, i. 467 aucupavi Titin. Velit., Plaut. True, Plaut. Men., Enn. Medea, Pac. Chrys. Plautus i. vagas Plaut. Mil. suiifragant Pomp. Mace. Praet. njeret Plaut.Men.359, 707 auspicavi Plaut. Pers. deluctavi Plaut. Trin. 469 scruto * Plaut. Aul. Accius i. auguro adsensit cunctant accinge contempla 470 altercas arbitrabunt amplexa criminat Ace. Oenom. Ace. Neopt. Ace. Alphes. Pomp. Mace. Gem. Ace. Philoct. Pacuv. Iliona Plaut. Stich. Ace. Alcm. Enn. Sat. Ill Accius ii. dignavi Ace. Meleag. miserarent Ace. Athamas largi Lueil. XIV Turpilius. intuietcon- tici Turpil. Paed. proficisceret Turpil. Hetaera Pacuvius. moderant Pacuv. Periboea 471 sortirent' Varr.Rer. Hum. XX Varro i. polliceres Varr. Anthrop. (?) Sallust. populat Virg. G. I Cicero iii. punitur M. Tujl. Off. I 88 ruminat Virg. Buc. VI fabrieantur M. Tull. Off. I. 147 Lucilius ii. 472 palpatur Lucil. XXIX luctant Enn. (Ann.) IX bellantur Virg. XI partiret Lueil. XXIX inpertit Lueil. XXVII " Inserted from 497. 21 ? P Inserted from 419. 25 ? 9 Inserted from 503. 39? ' Inserted from 464. 25 ? From this point I omit to notice non-use of lists. ' Inserted from 317. 31 ? ' A marginal adscript ? See section vi, below. 24 Nonius Marcellus' Gloss, iii. cohorta- Quadrig. Ann. rent V moderant Ace. Epig. conmisere- scimus Virg. A. II proeliant Enn. Achilles conplectite Pomp. Fullones 473 expergis- Pomp. Agam. ceret Supp. labasco Accius congredias Plaut. Epid. certatur Pacuv. Arm. Jud. frustro Pomp. Maial. imitat Varr. Epist. Lat. II execrare Afran. Incend. progredi NoviusVindem. consolare Varr. Oedipoth. minitas Liv. Danae 474 mutuet Caecil. Asotus percontare Novius Male- voli ominas Pomp. Cret. vel Pet. savies Pomp. Munda, Novius Quaes- tio paciscunt Naev. Bell. Poen. VII convivant Pomp. Munda mirabis Pomp. Patruus urinantur Cic. Acad. II miserete Enn. Hec. opino Plaut. Bacch. 475 promeres Plaut. Trin. opitula Liv. Eq. Troi. fite Cato de Praed. Mil., Crassus II. XVI, Liv. Odyss. paenitebunt Pacuv. Arm. Jud. partiret Afran. Divert, recordavit Quadrig.Ann.V Alph. Verb. poti Pacuv. Iliona praestolat Turpil. Paed. 476 revortit Pomp. Maial. rhetoricasti Novius Asinus tutant Plaut. Merc. (II) Passive Voice Section. Plautus i. patitor Plaut. Asin. copulantur Plaut. Aul. praesagitur Plaut. Bacch. expalpabi- tur Plaut. Vid. reddibo Plaut. Cas. ludificata ero (Plaut. Mil.) osculavi Titin. Insubra ' expedibo Plaut. True. Pomponius. 477 manduca- Pomp. Papp. tur Agric. Turpilius. miseretur Turpil. Epicl. muneratur Turpil. Thrasyl. rixat Varr. Arm. Jud. Pacuvius. adiutatur Pacuv. Dulor. Cicero i. pigneraretur M. Tull. Rep. I Varro i. 478 murmurari Varr.Eipcw ^Xow. excalceatur Varr. Pseud. ApoU. nutritur et nutricatur Varr. Testam. Cicero ii (supplies extra-quo- tation to nutritur et nutricatur). Lucilius ii. volam Lucil. XXVIII Dictionary of Republican Latin. 25 Gloss, iii. comman- ducatur Lucil. IV 479 esuribo Pomp. Augur fatiscuntur Ace. Epinaus. conscreabor Plaut. Pers. fruticari Cic. Att. XV exugebo Plaut. Epid. Alph. copulantur invenibo poeniuntur 480 sacrifican- tur discrepuit " spolor Verb. Plaut. Aul. Pomp. Bucc. Adopt. M. Tull. Tusc. I Varr. Her. Div. XIV Cic. de Or. Ill Afran. Crimen Cicero v. verecunda- tur M. Tull. Hort. Plautus ii. convertitur Plaut. Amph. Varro ii. ruminatur Varr. Sexag. precant miras Varr. Eum. Varr. Eum. Sisenna. 481 nolitote Sis. Hist. Ill Gloss. V. gliscitur Sempr. Asellio Hist. IV ignescitur Laber. Colax. luxuriabat Tubero Hist. XIV, Virg. G. HI Varro v. focilatur Varr. V.P.R. emunge- rentur Varr. Catus II (III) Appended Section. Gloss, i. libertatem uti Titin. Quintus potior il- 1am rem Ter. Adelph. Plautus i. 482 opus est il- 1am rem Plaut. Cist. Pomponius. callet illam rem Pomp. Pictor. Book VIII, De Mutatis De- CLiNATioNiBUS, i.e. Abnormal Noun-Stems. Gloss, i. apncatio itiner festinem 483 lacte M. Tull. Sen. Varro Prans. Par. Titin. Quintus Enn. (Ann.) X, Hemina Ann. IV Plautus i. mansuem quaesti tumulti 484 victi aesti senati vas 485 sumpti "^ iteris exerciti aspecti scriptio Plaut. Asin. Titin. Full., Plaut. Aul. Plaut. Cas. Plaut. Capt. Pacuv. Chrys. Plaut. Epid. M. Tull. Off. 11145 Plaut. Trin. 250 Naev. Lycurg. Ace. Arm. Jud. Ace. Astyan. Cic. de Or. II ° Transposed from p. 481 M. ? Or is it not rather an interpolation ? ^ The lemmas sumpti— farti appear to be in reality extra-quotations to senati, above. Nonius Marcellus' salti Ace. Melanip- Novius. pus vulgariam Novius Zona lucti Ace. Pelop. pannibus *■ Pomp. Mace. 486 parti Paeuv. Atal. Gem. frons y Virg. G. II, Varr. Farm. Accius 11. ibus Titin. Gem., indecoris Ace. Atham. Plaut. Mil. 489 fetis Ace. Bacch. excelsitas M. TuU. Off. Ill 24 sublima Ace. Phin. Campans Plaut. Trin. 545 Luci ius i. pernicii M. Tull. pro S. labosum Lueil. Sat. Ill Rose., Sis. Hist. nefantia Lucil. Sat. Ill VI( = Gell.IX, gracila Lucil. Sat. VIII xiv, 8) bacchana- herem Naev. Gymn. ^ liorum ■= Sallust. Lucretius. Ennius. 487 gelu Lucr. V. 205 tumulti Enn. Hee. Lytr. vapos Lucr. VI 952 490 progenii Pacuv. Paulus Accius i. strepiti admirabi- Enn. Hee. Lytr. M. Tull. Off. pervico Ace. Arm. Jud. litas II 38 loni Plaut. Aul. 556 itiner Enn. Teleph. antistitam Aee. Astyan. ferocia Pacuv. Teuc. gemiti Plaut. Aul. 722 deleritas Laber. specis Ace. Alcm. holerorum i Lucil. Sat. XV gallum Varr. Eum. mixtura et generibus Aee. Alem. modera- Argus * Plaut. Amph. tura* Varr. V.P.R. I 488 augura Ace. Tel. guberna ^ Lucil. Sat. XX humu Varr. Prans. Par. flucti Aee. Tel. Turpilius. . 491 singularia Turpil Demetr. Pomponius. lubidinitas Laber. Scylax piscati Pomp. Pisca- fructi Turp. Caneph., tores Turp. Het. poematis M. Tull. Off. Ill mansio Cic. Orat. 177 15 volutabun- cultio M. Tull. Sen. 56 dus M.TuU. Rep.II y Belonged to the ' Varro ii ' series and was entered here by Nonius in suite of the extra-quotation to parii {rorxi Varr. Andab. (See above, p. 6.) 2 See section vii, below. » Probably from a note on some line of Accius, e.g. 682 R. 1= Possibly inserted from 154. 21, as a parallel to/ttis, below. « Cf. hohroruvi^ below. d These lemmas form the conclusion of the ' Lucilius i ' series, and should stand after bacchanalioruin, p. 489. Dictionary of ttepublican Latin. 27 porti domuis Turpil. Demi. Var. Ta(^. Mfv. Pacuvius soniti glutino Pacuv. Dulor. Lucil. XXVI Cicero i. cautio 492 ferocia Cic. de Or. II M.Tull. Rep.VI Varro i. gelo cestis fructuis quaesti senecta • Varr. Sesqueul. Varr. Devicti Varr. Meleag. Varr. Prom. Lib. Virg. A. VI Sallust. inermis Galliae Sail. Sail. Jug. bell. Hist. IV Afranius. 493 effigi Afran. Vopisc. intemperia ^ Gell. I 1 7 poemato- rum Afran. Privign. Terence. 497 Ace. pro Abl. (Ace. vel Nom. pro Titin. Gemina cautio Ter. Andr. Abl. Turp. Demetr.) acritas Ace. Neopt. largitas Ter. Adelph. dextrabus Liv. Odyss. curatura Ter. Eun. 498 499 Gen. pro Abl. Dat. pro Ace. Plaut. Trin., Cic. Tusc. IV Titin. Barbat. Lucilius ii. inberbi Lucil. XXX Ace. pro Gen. M. Tull. Off. II, Virg. Buc. VII sescentum Lucil. XXX(bis) Plautus i. Alph. Verb. 494 pauperiess Enn. Hecuba 500 Abl. pro Gen. Plaut. Pseud. Varro v. Pomponius. aedis Varr. V.P.R. I Ace. pro Pomp. Praec. victuis Varr. V.P.R. I Nora. post. graduis Varr. V.P.R. II puerilitas Varr. Catus anuis Varr. Catus praecantrix Varr. Catus rituis Varr. Catus pronis *" Varr. Farm. 495 teneritas Cie. Fin. V Book IX, De Numeris et Casibus, i.e. Irregularities of Syntax. Gloss, i. Ace. Sing Sis. Hist. IV, pro Gen. Titin. Velit., Plur. Titin. Gemin. 496 Ace. pro Plaut. Amph. Dat.* 257 Gen. pro Ace. Titin. Psalt. (veretur illam rem Afran. Compit., Afran. Simul., Afran. Susp.) Cf. inventus et iuventa, p. 433. ' Perhaps in reality an extra-quotation to effigi- e Cf. 507. 18, s.v. evenat. '' Inserted from 178. 31? i Possibly some of the lemmas in this series are really of the nature of extra- quotations, e.g. 'Ace. vel Nom. pro Abl.' ISfonitis Marcellus' Novius. Nom. pro Dat. Nov. Agric. Accius ii. SOI Gen. pro Dat. Ace. Neopt. Turpilius. Nom. pro Gen. Turp. Epicl. Abl. pro Dat. Lucil. Cicero i. Gen. pro Nom. M.Tull.Rep.VI (?) Gloss, ii. Abl. pro Ace. Virg. A. V. Varro i (supplies extra-quota- tions, e.g. to ' Ace. pro Abl.', p. 497). Accius iii. Sallust. 502 Ace. pro Gen. Ace. Myrm., Sail. Hist. Ill Afranius. Lucil. ii. Aec. pro Lucil. XXVI, Dat. Afr. Vop. Sisenna. Dat. pro Abl. Sis. Hist. Ill Nom. pro Abl. Sis. Hist. Ill Book X, De Mutatis Conju- gation ibus. Gloss, i. fervit Lucil. IX, Aec. Nyct, Titin. Setina (fervere Afran. Epist. Lucil. Sat. IX, Virg. A. IV) (fervat Pomp. Full.) Plautus i. 503 lavit Virg. G. HIS A. XS Plant. Pseud, (lavere Naev. Danae, Enn. Telam., Enn. Hecuba) (lavite Titin. Psalt.) Lucretius. 504 sonere Lucr. Ill Accius ii. 505 expedibo Pacuv. Atal., Ace. Nyctegr. Pacuvius. nolito ' Lucil. XXX axim Pacuv. Perib. Afranius. ' fervitur pro fer- vetur ' (503. 34) Afran. Vopisc. Gloss, iii. mantat Caecil. Hypo- bol Rastr. artivit Nov. Dotata audibo Enn. Telam., etc. 506 fulgit Lucil. Sat. VII, etc. (fulgere Lucr. V, etc.) es Lucil. XXIX, Pomp. Mace, gem. Alph. Verb. amplant Pacuv. Teucer aperibo Pomp. Verni- ones ^ Inserted from 466. 20 ? 1 Perhaps has been transposed with following lemma. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 29 cupiret 507 dicebo edim facitur evenat faxim moneris nivit oboedibo operibo 508 paribit perveni- bunt reddibo reperibitur possetur ™ sapivi venibo poteratur ■ potestur soluerit 509 vivebo Lucr. I Novius Dapat. Caecil. Asot., Novius Buccul., Pomp. Condic, Plaut. Poen. Nigid. Comm. Gramm. XIX Enn. Hecuba Enn. Phoen. Pacuv. Arm. Jud., Pacuv. Chrys. Pacuv. Paulus Afran. Mariti Pomp. Praef. Mor. Pomp. Bucc. Auct. Pomp. Pyth. Gorg. Plaut. Vid. Pomp. Anul. Poster., Plaut. Epid., Caecil. Obolost Quadrig. Ann. I Novius Virg. Praegn. Pomp. Mace. Gem. Caelius Ann. I, Pacuv. Chrys., Quadrig. Ann. Ill Caelius Ann. VII Novius Dapat. Plautus ii. deplora- bundus Plaut. Aul. 317 coctum Plaut. Aul. 325 macet Plaut. Aul. 564 Book XI, De Indiscretis Adverbiis. Gloss, i. humaniter diserte disertim insaniter severiter 5x0 communi- tus blanditer celere benigniter festiviter ad M. Tull Pans. I Afran. Divort. Titin. Velit. Pompon. Auc- toratus Titin. Prilia Varro Rer. Div. Titin. Gemina Pacuv. Paulus Titin. Gemina Nov. Gemini Plautus i. avariter amiciter probiter munditer saeviter 511 maestiter Plaut. Cure. Plaut. Pers. Varr. Octog. Plaut.P0en.235 Plaut. Poen.33S Plaut. Rud. Lucretius. propritim Lucr. II S12 arapliter ' aliquan- tisper duriter Lucil. XIII, Pomp.Her.Pet., Plaut. Stich. Quadrig. Ann. VI Ter. Andr. Accius i. cautim Ace. Alphes. stnctim Cic. de Or. I Lucilius i. 513 firmiter fidele aequiter publicitus proterviter ignaviter Lucil. Sat. X Plaut. Capt. Pacuv. Atal. Lucil. Sat. XII Enn. Pancrat. Lucil. Sat. XVI "> Cf. poteratur, below. " Cf. possetur, above. ° Should stand, I fancy, after maestiter. 3° Nonius Marcellus' Varro i. mutuiter Varr. Octog. (?) Afranius. perspicace Afran. Divert. Alph. Adverb. Sueius PuUi Ace. Antenori- dae Pompon. Rus- ticus Varro Aiax Stram. M. TuU. de Or. (Ill), Afran. Privignus Pompon. Asina Caecil. Fallacia Quadrig. Ann. II Enn. Phoen. Turpil. Paed., Cass. Hem. Hist. IV, Afran. Repudiatus Ace. Didasc. I Pompon. Philo- sophia inmortalitus Turpil. Hetaera largitus Afran. Mater- terae iracunditer Caecil. Subdi tivus Lucil. V Pompon. Ver- res Salvus Afran. Purga- mentum, Naev. Bell. Poen. VI longinque Enn. Andr. Aechm. perplexim Plaut. Stich. saniter Afran. Megal. rarenter Caecil. Pausim. perspicace Afran. Divort. aspriter celeranter dapsile exquisitim hilare 514 festinatim pugnitus P ignaviter futtile humanitus inimiciter memore 515 mmutim parciter superbiter 516 contemtim temeriter restrictim praeclariter torviter puriter reverecun- diter Naev. Bell. Poen. Ace. Amphitr. Afran. Thais Quadrig. Ann. Ill Pompon. Auc- toratus Pompon. Arus- pex vel Pexor Rusticus Pompon. Mac- cus Virgo Sisenna. certatim abunde Virg. A. HI, Sis. Hist. Ill Sis. Hist. IV Gloss. V. 517 miseriter properiter ■ Laberius Serenus Book XII, De Doctorum In- DAGiNE, i.e. Various Pecu- liarities of Republican Latin. Gloss, i. desubito 518 derepente Picumnus 519 pauei et multi Titin. Prilia, Enn. Pancrat., Afran. Emanc, Caecil. Asot., Quadrig. Ann. II,Nov.Tripert. Turpil. Boeth., Enn. Phoen., Afran. Incend., Afran. Omen. Aem. Macer Ornithogon. I, Hyginus, Fab. Pictor Rer. Gest. I Ter. Eun. P Perhaps from a note onfunditus. 1 See below, section vii. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 31 censere et arbitrari affici decuriones lateres modestia, moderatio 521 proventus Varr.Rer.Hum. XX, PlautRud. M. Tull. Off. I Varr.V.P.R.III Varr.V.P.R.III Varr. Catus Lucil. XXVI Accius i. inbuere Ace. Arm. Jud. Accius ii. compos Ace. Clyt. Lucilius i. mira et miracula Lucil. Sat, I Turpilius. 522 dies victor ver sacrum SisennaHist.IV Turpil. Paed. Virg. G. II apud 523 pro Lucil. XXX, Ace. Eurys., Turpil. Leucad. Virg. A. VIII (?) Afranius. operari Pomp. Praec. Post., Afran. Except, (bis) sexagenarios per pon- tem Varr. V. P. R. II (?) Virgil, stricturae Virg. A 524 proximum memini turba et turbae ' 525 demensum superva- cuum caecus VIII Virg. A, V Virg. Buc. IX Ace Atham. Ter. Phorm. Varr.V.P.R.IV Varr.V.P.R. IV annos, dies° Virg. G. II, etc. 526 impotentia Sisenna Hist. Ill dona Virg. Buc. VI quando Virg. A. VI Lucilius ii. vel M. Tull. Epist. ad Brut. VIII, Lucil. XXIX 528 de Lucil. XXVI Pilumnus et Picumnus Varr. V. P. R. II caduceus Varr. V.P.R. II Plautus ii. calvi Plaut. Amph. lucis Varr. Hebdo- mades opera Virg. A. IV, Plaut. Asin. Varro ii. 529 vile Varr. Virg. Div. praeter Varr. Eum. faetiales Varr. V.P.R. II, III 6ellius. 530 atque ( = Gell. X29) intra ( = Gell.XIIi3) Varro iii. negativas duas Varr. Bimarc. Varro v. glabri, lydii deinsuper 531 sifilare nubentes secundum fornum et fornaces aere diruti negativae duae 53- Varr. V.P.R. I Sail. Hist. I Virg. G. I 31. Varr. V.P.R. I Varr. V.P.R. I Virg. A. VIII, Varr. V.P.R. I Varr. V.P.R. II Varr. V.P.R. II Should this stand beside compos, p. 521 M. ? Does the first part of this lemma belong to ' Gloss. 1 ? 32 Nonius Marce/lus' tabemae Van. V.P.R. II Statilinus, etc. Varr. Catus Book XIII, De Genere Navi- GIORUM. Plautus i. celox Plaut. Asin. 533 corbita Plaut. Poen. (bis) horia Plaut. Rud. (bis) cercyrus Plaut. Stich. Turpilius. 534 letnbus Ace. Deiph., Turpil. Leuca- dia Cicero i. myoparo M.TuU.Rep.III Varro i. faselus Varr. Desultor. Sallust. lenunculus Sail. Hist. II Book XIV, De Genere Vestimentorum, 535 actuanae lintres scaphae codicariae pristis Sail. Hist. II Virg. G. I Sail. Hist. II Sail. Hist. IV Clodius Rer. Hum. XII Afranius. cumba Afran.Exceptus (?) Sisenna. 536 onerariae Sis. Hist. Ill (?) Gloss. V. anquinae Lucil. (inc.) prosumia Caecil. Meretr., Caecil. Aethrio Gloss, i. tunica 537 calautica paenula aulaea plagae stola palla ' 538 strofium abolla sagum paluda- mentum 539 chlamys Titin. Velit, Cic. Catil.,Virg. (Aen.), Titin. Quintus M.TuU.in Clod. Pomp. Pannuc. Varr.V.P.R.III Varr. V.P.R. Ill Enn. Telephus (bis) Plaut. Men. 469 Turpil. Philop. Varr. Cosm. Sail. Hist. II Sail. Hist. Ill Virg. A. IV 137 regilla ralla Plautus i. Plaut. Plaut. Epid.223 Epid.230 rica Plaut. Epid.232 caesicium Plaut. Epid.230 indusium Plaut. Epid.231 540 patagium Plaut. Epid.231 supparum Plant. Epid.232 exoticum Plaut. Epid.232 plumatile Plaut. Epid.233 Novius. mollicina NoviusPaedium Lucilius i. amphitapoe Lucil. Sat. I Turpilius, Varro i, Sallust. (See note or\ palla in " Gloss, i" sequence.) Afranius. toga Afran. Fratr. 541 laena Virg. A. IV" ' In Book I likewise (p. 3 M. ) this Plautus-quotation may belong to ' Gloss, i.' But the remaining lemmas strofium — chlamys seem lo have been entered here in suite of the extra-quotation to palla from the Lucilius i list. 1^ Inserted from 240. 25, 549. 16? Dictionary of Republican Latin. 33 meretricum Afran. Excep- vestis tus Virgil. Cicero iv. carbasus Virg. A. VIII, XI, M. Tull. in Verr. de Suppl. (11, V, 30) toga prae- M. Tull. de texta Suppl. (Verr. n, V, 36) Plautus ii. limbus^ Plaut. Aul. 519 flammeus^ Plaut. Aul. 510 Varro ii. 542 ricinium Varr. Ta^. Mew. reticulum Varr. Sesqueul. tapete Varr. Here. Socr Cicero viii. culcita Cic. Tusc. Ill Varro v. subucula Varr. V.P.R. I capitia Varr. V.P.R. I encombo- mata Varr. Catus Book XV, De Genere Vaso- RUM. Plautus ii. 43 aula Plaut. (frag.) Amph. matella Plaut. (frag.) Amph. mortarium Plaut. Aul. 95 pelvis Laber. Virgo fidelia Plaut. Aul. 622 Varro ii. patella Varr. Eum. Gloss, iv. cupae et tinae Varr. V.P.R. I urnula Varr. V.P.R. I cadi Lucil. XVIII urnarium Varr. Tac^. Mfi/. polybrum simpuium lenis Liv. (Odyss.) Varr. Est. Mod. Afran. Fratr. obba Varr. Est. Mod. cantharus Virg. Buc. VII dolia Varr. Est. Mod Cicero viii. alabaster Cic. Acad. II scyfus batiola Virg. (A. VIII) Plaut. Colax. calices Varr.Est.Mod.y, Cic. Tusc. Ill cymbia crateres Virg. A. V Virg. A. VII Varro iv. 546 orcae Varr. R.R. I 13 nassiterna Varr. R.R. I 22 catinus Varr. R.R. I 63 Gloss, v. calamistrum Cic. Orat. carchesia Virg. A. V 77, G. IV 380, Lucil., Catullus Veronensis hirnea Plaut. Amph. mixtarium Lucil. V Varro v. calpar 547 truUeura armillum sinum et galeola Varr. V.P.R. I Varr. V.P.R. I Varr. V.P.R. I Virg. Buc. VII, Varr. V.P.R. I "^ Have these lemmas been transposed ? ... y Inserted from 545, 2? For the intruding Virgil lemmas see section vu. 34 Nonius Marcellus' lepistae Varr. V.P.R. I creterra Naev. Lycurg., Varr. V.P.R. Ill Book XVI, De Genere Calcia- mentorum (lost). Book XVII, De Coloribus Vestimentorum. Gloss, i. cumatilis Titin. Setina molochi- num Caecil. Pausim. Plautus i. impluviatus Plaut. Epid.224 caltula et Virg. Buc. II, crocotula Plaut. Epid. 231 cerinum Plaut. Epid.233 549 ferrugi- Virg. G. IV, neum Plaut. Mil. Turpilius. ostrinam Turpil. Hetaera Virgil. murex Virg. Buc. IV43 luteus Virg. Buc. IV44 Plautus ii. crocota^ Plaut. Aul. 521 violacia" Plaut. Aul. 510 Varro v. pullus Varr. V.P.R. Ill 550 anthracinus Varr. V.P.R. Ill Book XVIII, De Genere ClBORUM. Varro ii. asparagos Varr. Virg. Div. blitum Varr. ]?um. Varro iii. lapatium Varr. Modius Cicero vi. menae M. Tull. Fin. II Cicero viii. acipenser Cic. Tusc. Ill nasturcium Cic. Tusc. V Varro iv. mariscae Varr. R.R. I 6 ocinum Varr. R.R. I 31 Gloss. V. lopades Plaut. Paras. Med. murrina Varr. Anthro- pop. portulaca Varr. Discipl. VIII Varro v. lora Varr. V.P.R. I sapa Varr. V.P.R. I passum Varr. V.P.R. I moriola Varr. V.P.R. I 552 turunda Varr. Catus Book XIX, De Genere Ar- MORUM. Gloss, i. catapulta Plaut. Cure, Titin. Setina velites Titin. Barbatus Lucilius i. rorarii Lucil. Sat. VII Varro i. 553 antesignani Varr. 'AXX' 'osXupa5 Cicero vi. mancum M.Tull.Fin.III Gloss, iv A. minutum Varr Epist. Lat. Sisenna. maceriae Sis. Hist. Ill manipula- tim Sis. Hist. Ill multifariam Sis. Hist. Ill marsup- pium Varr. Catus molimen- tum Sis. Hist. IV Gloss iv. B. modimpe- Varr.Rer.Hum, ratores XX Cicero vii. magnilo- quentia Cic. Orat. ministra- trix Cic. de Or. I male au- diam Cic. de Or. II multitude Cic. de Or. Ill (bis) Cicero viii. mulierositas Cic. Tusc. IV Dictionary of Republican Latin. SI Gloss. V. memoria Pacuv. Chrys. murmuril- Plaut. Rud., lum Plaut. (inc.) 143 mediastri- LuciLXV,Cato nos Praec. ad fil. Varro v. cf. marstippium, above, p. 141. N-Section. Plautus i. nuperum Plaut.Capt. 718 neminis Plaut.Capt. 764 Accius i. noxitudo Ace. Arm. Jud. Pomponius. nubere Pompon. Pan- nuc. Accius ii. nitiditatem Ace. Bacch. Virgil. numen Virg. A. II Lucilius ii. noenum Lucil. XXX Alph. Verb. 144 nevult Titin. Setina, Plaut. Trin. nigret Pacuv. Chrys., Ace. Baech. nitidant Enn. Cresph., Ace. Theb. nixurire Nigidius Comm.Gramm. XXV notificem Ace. Atreus Plautus ii. numellae Plaut. Asin. nugivendos Plaut. Aul. Varro ii. 145 nidus Varr. Quin- quatr. Gellius. nidulantur ( = Gell. IIIio) nescium ( = Gell. IX12) noctescere ( = Gell. XVIII ") (?) Cicero vi. nepam Plaut. Cas. (Enn. trag.), M. Tull. Fin. V Sisenna. nex Sis. Hist. IV Varro v. nenia Varr.V.P.R. IV 0-Section. Plautus i. 146 obscaevavit Plaut. Asin. 266 opimitas Plaut. Asin. 282 obba P Varr. Est. Mod. opulentitas Plaut. Mil. glor. Accius i. orbitudinis Aee. Amph. Pomponius. ocquini- scere Pomp. Prostib. Accius ii. oblitterare Ace. Agam. Afranius. offendo Afran. Vopisc. 147 olat Afran. Fratr. Alph. Verb. obsorduit Caecil. Hypob. Rastr. obstrigillare Enn. Sat. II obvarare Enn. Aeh. P Inseited from 545. E 2 5t Nonius Marcdlus" Alph. Adverb. obsecun- Nigidius de Dis danter I oculitus Plaut. Comic, ossiculatim Caecil. Fallacia Cicero v. officere M.Tull. Off. Ill 148 olivitatem Varr. Gloria Plautus ii. occepso Plaut. Amph. 673 osa sum Plaut. Amph. 900 Varro ii. orbitum Varr. VvaQi Gellius. opuliscere ( = Cell. XVIII lO Cicero vii. occule Cic. de Or. II Cicero viii. opinabilern Cic. Acad. I P-Section. paenu- larium 149 plebitatem (?) Gloss, iii. Novius Fulloni- cum Cato pro Ve- turio Lucil. XXII Varr.V.P.R.III petilum paces pondo mille octingen tum panus Varr.V.P.R.III Lucil.IX,Afran. Matert., Nov. Oratio pellicula- Enn. XI Ann., mentum Lucil. XIX, Caecil. Fenera- tor 150 prognariter Plaut. Persa perperos Ace. Pragm. (bis) praecox Enn. Ann. VIII, Lucil. Ill, (Var- ro Syneph.), Novius populatim Pompon. Mac- cus praemiatores nocturni Naev. Agrypn. populacia Laber. Late Loq. possestrix Afran. Libertus perpetuassit Enn, Ann. IX 151 praecisum et omasum Naev. Nervol. pisculentum Cato Orig. V, VII pasceolus Plaut. Rud. Plautus ii. piem Plaut. Asin. 506 portisculus Plaut. Asin. 5 15 perplexabile Plaut. Asin. 792 praesegmina Plaut. Aul. 312 152 pipulo Plaut. Aul. 445 picos Plaut. Aul. 701 Varro ii. percellere pinsere porcas putidum paenitu- dinem 1 praebitio 153 pueros paxillus Varr. Parm. Varr. Ta^. Mfi/. Varr. Ta(jb. Mev. Varr. Ta0. Mex. Pacuv. Teuc. Varr. Eura. Varr. Eum. Varr. Eum. Gellius. proxumi ( = Gell. X 24) 1 Inserted from 169. 28; 185. 2 ; 243. 5? Dictionary of Repiibhaiii Latin. 53 properatim' ( = Gell.XIIi5) permities ^ Lucil. XXIX Alph. parcuit perbitere pigrare Quad- 154 provigere Verb. Naev. rigem. Pacuv. Perib., Titin. Fullon., Liv. Tereus, Enn. Hec. Ace. Epig.,Acc. Chrysippus Pacuv. Teuc. puellascere Varr. Baiae Alph. Adverb. palaestricos Afran.Exceptus populatim praesente primiter Caecil.Oboiost. Pompon. Syr., Ace. Melan., FenestellaAnn. II, Nov. Minta med. Pompon. Mace. Gem., Lucil. Y prognariter Plaut. Pers. properatim Quadrig. Ann. II,Pomp.Bucc. adopt., Caecil. Ploc., Pae. Teuc., Aec. Teleph. Cicero v. 15s praefractum M.Tull. Off. Ill Gloss, i. pulcritas Caecil. Harpaz. proletarii Enn. Ann. prospica Naev. Astiologa pollentia Plaut. Rud. propitiabilis Enn. Caupun- cula pauxillisper Plaut. True. 156 ponderi- tatem Aee. Pragm. I puritia Varr.Rer.Div. I praelum- Novius Vin- bare dem. puerae Varr. Devicti pupae Varr. Aborig. pipare Varr. Aborig. procudere Varr. To eVi rf, ^. praecox Varr. Syneph. 157 pauperat Plaut. Mil.glor, Plaut. Aeharist, Titin. Privigna, Titin. Varus potus Lucil. XXX pauciens Titin. Gemina (bis) Plautus i. pollictores Varr.Mut. Mul., Cosmot., Plaut. Asin. putamina Plaut. Capt. LfUcretius. r58 pestilitas Luer. VI Accius i. paeniturura Ace. Epinaus. Accius ii. Ace. Epigon. pausa prosperari Lucil. XXVI puellos * Varr. Testam. pecus Plaut. Rud. 159 percitum Plaut. Amph. pecua Naev. Gymn. putret Pacuv. Teuc, Ace. Erig. Lucilius i. protollere Lucil. Sat. I priva Lucil. Sat. I prodigitas Lucil. Sat. VI Pacuvius. 160 porcet Pacuv. Atal. prolixitu- din em Pacuv. Dulor. >• The quotation from Caecilius may come from the ' Gloss, v ' list. See below, section vii. ^ Cf. projligare, p. 160 M. * Ought this, with the three succeeding lemmas, to follow ;>2iiiilka>i Latin. 55 redhostit repueras- cere retorissat raraites ^ ruspari regredere ruminari Ace. Amph., Ace. Didasc. II Novius Agric. Pompon. Medi- cus Plaut. Merc., Plaut. Poen., Varr. Trihod., Lucil. Sat. IX Acc.Nyct.,Acc. Meleag. Enn. Ach. Varr. Tanaquil, Liv. Aegisth. Alph. Adverb. rusticatim Pompon. Aleo- nes Plautus ii. 167 rumiferare Plaut. Amph. Varro ii. returare Varr. Agath. rutuba Varr. Sexag. revoeare Varr. Sexag. Gellius. recentari ( = Gell. X V 2 5 ) Varro iii. rapinatores Varr. Bimarc. (?) Gloss, iv. reda "^ Varr. Epist. ad Varr. Cicero vi. reeentiorum M. Tull. Fin. II Varro v. rumam Varr. Catus 168 reiculas Varr. Catus S-Section. Gloss, i. saltuatim'i Sis. Hist. VI (cf. Gell. XII, xv) Varr. Bimarc. Varr. Here. Socr. Varr. Manius Masur. Sab. XVII (cf. Gell. IV, XX, 11) suspiciosum Cato deReFlor. (cf. Gell. IX, xii, 7) Enn. Ach. (cf. Gell. IV, xvii, 14) Plaut. Nervol. (cf. Gell. Ill, lii, 6) Varr. Ta0. Mcv. Varr. TvUBi Virg. A. I Enn. Androm. Virg. A. VII, Propert. Eleg. IV Lucil. VII Cie. de Or. II Ace. Aegisth. NoviusDecuma Enn. Medea superstitent Enn. Melan. septuose^ Pacuv. Antiopa sempiterne Pacuv. Medus septemfa- Santra Verb, riam Antiq. Ill simulter Plaut. Pseud. scripta'' M. Tull. Hort. suceidiam'' M. Tull. Sen. scapum sutrinas scabre strigosus 169 subiees ' scraptas, etc. sabulum suctu super scabres ' secundare simat 170 scurrile sordet sublabrare sublimare * Perhaps s.v. rumpere (ramites). " Or is this lemma inserted from 26. 10? * Possibly inserted from 187. 32 (in a ' Gellius sequence '). " Cf. subiecere (p. 387 M.), in a 'Gloss, i' sequence. ' This and the seven following lemmas seem to belong to the Alph. Verb, series. e This and the three following lemmas seem to belong to the Alph. Adverb. series. '' These two lemmas seem to belong to Cicero v. S6 Nonius Marcellus' 171 signatam superbos suggillare satullem singulura sperem scalpurrire 172 somnurnas satias squalam socienno scaturrex somnicu- losus Lucil. XXIX Plaut. Amph. Varr. Lex. Maen. Varr. Trepl aXp. Plaut. Cist. Varr. Aborig. Plaut. Aul. 467 Varr. Prom. lib. Ace. Astyan. Enn. Telam. Plaut. Aul. 659 Varr. Est. Mod. Laber. Sorores Plautus i. saevitudo Plaut. Bacch. 2 173 suavitudo Plaut.Bacch. 27 severitudine Plaut. Epid. sorditudine Plaut. Poen. Lucretius sententia speciem sodalis Lucr Lucil Cic. . IV . XXX de Or. II Accius i. solitate subiti sanctitudo 174 satu scriptione Ace. Ace. Ace. Ace. Varr Erys. Arm. Jud Tereus Pelopid. Anthrop. Accius ii. segnitas Ace. Aen. aut. Dee. Lucilius i. scelerosi Lueil. Sat. I Afranius. speratum Afran. (bis) Fratr. Terence. 175 screare Ter. Heaut. serescit Luer. I, Virg. G. I, III Lucilius ii. sueerdae Lueil. XXX simitu Lucil. XXX subsicivum Lucil. XXVIII supplosio- nem ' superbilo- quentia' sarcinator Cic. de Or. Ill Cie. Tusc. IV Lucil. XXVIII Alph. Verb. I' 176 sospitent Enn. Melan. Pac. Medus. Alph. Adverb.' singulatim Caeeil. Hypob. Rastr., Caelius Ann. I, Lucil. XIX sollemnitus Liv. Aegisth. Varro iii. seenatilis Varr. Modius saperdae Varr. Modius surditatem Cic. Tusc. V simplicitus Plaut. Merc. suscitabulumVarr. "Oi/os XOpas similitas Caeeil. Syracus. Cicero vi. 177 salebras M. Tull. Fin. (II) Gloss, iv. sublestum Plaut. (Pers.) Cicero vii. supelleetilis Cic. Orat. 79 scurrile Cic. Orat. 88 sportas Sail. Hist. II sodes Cie. Orat. 154 ' Inserted here in suite of extra-quotation to subsicivum from ' Cicero vii ' list. '^ See note on scabres, p. 169 M. It is wortli mention that sospitare occurs in a line of Lucil. XXVII (472 M. 13). ' See note on septuose, p. 170 M. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 57 17! scopas sciuntur Cic. Orat. 235 Cic. de Or. II T-Section. Alph. Verb. taetret tetinerit tetulit Pacuv. Perib. Pacuv. Medus, Ace. Clyt., Pa- cuv. Hermiona Ace. Androm., (i'jCaeeil.Hypo- bol. Alph. Adverb. taxim Pompon. Bucc. Adopt, temerius Aeeius Didasc. II testatim Pompon. Verr. Aegr. tractim Plaut. Amph. 313 Varro ii. tudieulare Varr. Mareip. traps Varr. Parm. 179 tegillum Varr. Sesqueul. (?) Gloss, iv. " terta Varr."Ex> Cf. 449. 13 s.v, labra. The lemma came from a note on Sisenna Hist, IV fr. 103 P. Dictionary of Repnhlicaii Latin. 63 N-Section. Lucilius ii. nundinae Lucil. XXVI Gloss, iii. 215 nasus Lucil. nepos nuntius VII, Lucil. XXII Enn. (Ann.) nervi novalia Varro iii. Varr.''Oj'ojXi;/3as Virg. G. I 0-Section. Plautus i. obsequium Plaut. Asin. Lucilius i. 216 ostrea Lucil. Sat. IX, XIII and III (?) Gloss, iii — V. oves Varr. Rer.Hum. XXII (et alibi) obsidio Enn. (Ann.) 217 putei piscatio pulvis posticam P-Section. Gloss, i. Varr. Gallus vel Fund. Cic. Fin. II Enn. VIII Ann. Titin. Velit,, Titin. Fullones, Lucil. VIII Plautus i. partus 218 praesepia panis Plaut. Aul. 75, 276, and True. Plaut. Cure. 228 Plaut. Cure. 367 pingue esf Nov. Tripert. perdix Varr. Admi- rand. Lucretius. palpebrum Lucr. IV (?) Novius pannus Nov. Tabellaria purpurissumNov. Sanniones (?) Accius i. permities'* Ace. Melan. 219 palumbes Lueil. XIV, Plaut. Baceh., Pomp. Dives Lucilius i. pigror (pigret Lucil. Sat. X Enn. (Ann.) XVI, Accius Clytaem.) Varro i. pali Varr. Flaxt. Cicero ii. periculum M. Tull. Deor. Nat. II Afranius. paratio Afran. Privig. Lucilius ii. penus " 220 polypus Gloss. paupertas papaver pilleus prosecta Lueil. Lucil. XXIX iii — V. Caecil. Ploc. Varr. Admi- rand., Plaut. (Trin.) Plaut. Comic. Lucil. XIV, Varr. Rer. Div. XIV = From note on Plaut. Cure. 367 ? d Should this lemma follow palpebrum, above ? Or does it come from the note on servitiPi.cc. Clytaem. ap. Non. 226. lo? e Possibly from a note on Virg. A. I 703. 64 Nonius Marcdbis^ pedis Plant. Vid. simile est Titin. Fullones, pluvia Laber. Late Naevius Gym- Loq. nast. 221 pistillus Munatius propago ' Enn. (Ann.) Plautus i. patibulum Licin. Rer. schema Plaut. Amph. Rom. XXI, 117 Plaut. Carbon. 225 scrobes Plaut. Amph, (frag.) R-Section. syngraphas Plaut. Asin. Lucretius. Lucretius. rictus Lucr. V and silex Lucr. I Titin. spicae M. Tull. Sen. (?) Afranius. Accius i. ii. rogus Afran. Epist. 226 squalor Ace. Eurys. suasiones ? Virgil. servitus Ace. Clyt. rudens Virg. A. Ill, Plaut. Rud. Turpilius. reticulus Claudius I scutum Turpil. Demi- 2 22 ramentum Plaut. (Bacch.) urg. rastros Corn. Cels. Varro i. Terence. seplasium Varr. Syneph. raptus Ter, Adelph. and Anthrop. Cicero iv. Cicero iii. reditus M. Tull. Phil. I stupor s Ace. Erigona statura M. Tull. Off, I S-Section. 126 Gloss, i. (?) Gloss, iii. sexus Sail. Hist. II stirpem Enn. Ann. V, specus Enn.Ann.XVII Pacuv. Atal., 223 strigilim Varr. Bimarc. Virg. A. XII sortes Virg. (Aen.) Ill ; salis Varro Cicero v. socrus Naev. Pellex 227 satio M. Tull. Sen. salum Enn. Hec. sibilum Virg. Buc. V T-Section. sagum Enn. (Ann.) 1 224 spari Lucil. Gloss, i. sanguis Enn. Hec. tactus Cic. Tusc. IV subcubonemTitin. Psaltria tale Titin. Setina ' Recurs in Gloss, v series in Book I, p. 64 M. e From note on Cic. Off. I 126? Dictionary of Republican Latin. 65 Plautus i. tonitrus Plaut. Amph. tergum Plaut. Asin. and Pseud. Lucretius. te.xtus Lucr. V Accius i. terriculae Ace. Epinaus. Lucilius i. 228 torquem Lucil. Sat. XI Pacuvius. timor Pacuv. Perib. Varro i. tractus Varr. Mut. Mul. Virgil. tribulae Virg. G. I 229 torpor ii Sail. Hist. I tapete Virg. (A. IX) Gloss, iii. tributum Cato Orig. testa Varro ii. turdi Varr. Quinq. Varro iii. tarditas Varr. Bimarc. tibia Varr. Modius Tartara Virg. VI U-Section. Plautus i. uterus Plaut. Aul. 230 venatus Plaut. Mil. glor. Lucretius. vultus Lucr. IV Accius i. vulgus Sis. Hist. Ill, Virg. A. II, Ace. Eurys. usus Plaut. Amph , Ace. Oenom. Lucilius i. 231 vectis' Lucil. Sat. IV Pomponius. vepres' Pomp. Porens Sallust. vadum Sail. Hist. I Virgil. vespera Plaut. Amph , Virg. G. Ill (?) Lucilius ii. utres Lucil. Varro ii. 232 vigiliae Varr. Eiidym Cicero vi. victus M. Tull. Fin. V Book IV, De Varia Signifi- CATiONE Sermonum, i.e. a Latin Lexicon. A-Section. Gloss, i. advorsum Titin. Gemina anima (?) Titin. Fu'- lones Accius i. 233 aptam (?) Aec. Melan. and ' Demer.' Lucilius i. 23s aequales (?) Lucil. Sat. V" "^ Perhaps comes from the ' Sallust ' list and should precede tribulae, i Have these two lemmas been transposed ? 66 Nonius Marcellus' Turpilius. ?36 apertum (?) Turpi! . miurg. Pacuvius. De- 237 autumare Pacuv. Perib. and Dulor. altum ^ (?) Ace. Arm. Jud. aditus'' Ace. Medea Accius iii. 238 adtendere Ace. Diomed. . (bis) appellarei M.Tull.Off.IH (appellere Afran. Except.) Sallust. (Cicero i ?) aemulus (?) Sail. Hist. Ill, M. Tull. Rep. I Virg., etc. Virg., etc. Virg. Cicero iii. (?) M. Tull. Off. I (bis) Virgil. 241 aer Virg. G. II 123 amarum Virg. A. IV 15 242 admonere™ Virg. A. X 586 239 argutum accipere 240 ardere acre ambire agerere " audacia (?)Virg. A. IV 283 Varr. Bimarc. Virg. A. V • atrum alumnos (?) Virg. A. VI 576 (?)Virg. A. VI 243 agere 595 and 876 (?) Virg. A. VII 199 244 asperum aequare (?) Virg. A. IX 263 Virg. A. IX 337 Cice ro iv. accommo- datum M. Tull. in Verr. act. II (i) and in Verr. frument, (iii) Lucilius ii. 245 aridum Virg., Plaut. anceps Lucil. XXIX (bis) Gloss, iii. aura Virg .Varr, Eum. Alph. Verb. argutari Enn. Phoen,, Nov. Exod. Titin. Fullonia Virg. A. Ill, Pacuv. Medus, Pacuv. Arm. Jud. Pacuv. Chrys., Afran. Sim., Priv., Enn. Me- lan., Caecil. Symb., Pomp. Asina Cicero v. adducere (?) M.Tull. Sen. aequor Virg. Plautus ii. 247 advenire Plaut. Amph. aestus (?) Plaut. Asin. Varro ii. acerbum Varr. Agath. 246 attoUere auscultare album Varr. Sesq. •^ Should these lemmas follow aplam, p. 233 M. ? ' Inserted here from Cicero v list in suite of extra-quotation from that list to adtendere ? ™ Perhaps inserted here along with extra-quotation to ambire from Virg. A. X 243. n cf. gerere, p. 316 M, Dictionary of Reptiblican Latin. 67 Gloss, iv. Accius. adolere " Virg. 260 cernere Ace. Chrysipp., (?) Gloss. V. Epinaus. 248 alescere Lucr. II, Laber. Sorer. Lucil. i. 261 circumferre Lucil. Sat. II B-Section. (?) Lucilius ii. Turpilius. bellum Lucil. XXIX 262 confidentia Pacuv. Atal. (bis), Turpil. C-Section. Leucad. and Hetaera Gloss. 1. committere (?)Pacuv. Nip- Pacuvius. 249 confutare condere tra Titin. Setina (?)Sall. Catil. bell. Virg., etc. 263 consternari Pacuv. Perib. and Dulor. curriculus Varr. Epist. ad colere Jul. Caes. cedere 251 cursus Virg., etc. Virg. Cicero i. castigare Virg. calumnia M. Tull. Rep. 252 carpere Virg. Ill cunctari Virg., etc. capere Lucr. II, Virg.. Varro i. etc. calidum Varr. Trepl Kcp. 254 corripere Virg. quassatum Virg. Cicero ii. certare Virg. caelum M. Tull. Deor 255 crepare (?)Horat.Carm. Nat. II I contentus Virg., etc. comparare Ter. Eun , Ten Andr., Titin. Gemina 264 265 cogere Virg., etc. claudere Virg. 257 componere Virg., etc. Sallust. calx Lucil. Sat. VII, Virg. A. V citum Virg.Aen.VIII, callet Caecil. Asot., Ace. Aegisth., Sail. Cat. bell. Afran.Abducta, Cicero ill. Pacuv. Atal., citare (?) M.TuU.Off.I Serenus Opusc. 258 contendere Plaut.Vid., Cic. Epist. Cass., Virgil. Virg. A. V, 266 cadere (?) Virg. G. I Licin. Macer capessere (?) Virg. A. I This lemma recuis in Book I in the Gloss iv series, F 2 68 Nonius Marcellus' commo- Lucil., Plaut. dum P Asin. candet Virg. A. IV 267 castum Virg. A. VI censere ' Varr. Capr. Proel., Ace. Eurys., Naev. Poen. bell. VI, Cass. Hem. Hist. II, Quad- rig. Ann. VI coicere ' Virg. A. II 544, Afran. Sim. (bis), Matert. and Incend. 268 contingerei Virg. A. II 239, M.Tull. (Tusc.) V, Enn. Thyest. conferre (?) Virg. A. IX 44 and 690 confectum (?) Virg. A. XI 85 and 823 Terence. 269 concedere (?) Ter. Phorm., Hec. and Adelph. 270 consequi M. Tull. Epist. ad Caes. I (et alibi) "■ conserere Virg. convenire (?) Ter. Eun. and Phorm. 271 caedere (?) Ter. Andr. 272 quatere (?) Ter. Eun. Cicero iv. constat (?) M. Tull. ad Caes. iun. II 273 constituere (?) M. Tull. in Verr. act. II i colligere (?) M. Tull. in Verr. act. II ii and Phil. VI continens M. Tull. ad M. Cat., Epist. ad Sen. LfUcilius ii. 274 curatum Lucil. XXX conducere Lucil. XXX, and XXIX concele- brare Lucil. XXX 275 credere Lucil. XXVIII (bis) commodare (?)Lucil.XXVII captare Lucil. XXVII cognoscere (?) Lucil. XXVI (?) Gloss, iii-v. 276 competere Sail. Hist. I D-Section. Gloss, i. damnare (?) Titin. Velit, 277 delicere Titin. Quint, defendere Virg. Buc. VII, Enn. Ach. delica Titin. Quint. Plautus i. 278 delenitus M. Tull. ad Cass. I and Plaut. Amph. degere Plaut, Aul. 165 and Epid. dare Virg., etc. 279 deponere (?) Plaut. Aul, 575 destitui Naev. Gymnast. Accius i. 280 dedicare Ace. Alphes. Pomponius. dicere (?) Pomp. ' Pis- tores ' 1' Possibly inserted here in suite of extra-quotations to capessere from Plautus u list. ^ 9 Do these lemmas come from the ' Alph. Verb.' list ? '■ See below, section vii. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 69 Accius ii. 281 dignatus Ace. Neopt. Lucilius i. dominus Lucil. Sat. VI Turpilius. 282 deliberare Turp. Philop. Sallust. discrimen (?) Sail. Hist. I Virgil. duci (?) Virg. Buc. IX 284 differre (?) Virg. G. Ill durum (?) Virg. G. IV decernere Virg., etc. 286 dimissum (?)Virg. A. Ill 320 dignari Virg. A. Ill 475 discere Virg. A. V 287 defunctum Virg. A. VI 83 and 306 Terence. distrahere (?) Ter. Phorm. and Virg. A.VII dicare M. TuU. Epist. ad Caes. I detrahere (?) Ter. Heaut. Cicero iv. 288 despicere M.Tull. inVerr. act. Hi. deicere M.Tull. in Verr. act. I, Phil. I and ad Caes. iun. II Lucilius ii. 289 deductum ' Lucil.XXX and XXVII deferre Lucil. XXIX destinare Lucil. XXIX docere Lucil. XXIX (?)Alph. Verb. 290 deligere Plaut. Cure, Titin. Prilia (?)Alph. Adverb. dextrum Virg. Gellius. deprecor ( = Gell. VII, xvi) Cicero vii. divortium Virg. A. IX, Cic. de Or. Ill E-Section. Plautus i. (? Gloss, i.) exigere (?) Plaut. Aul. and Capt. 291 elidere (?) Plaut. Rud. 292 exanclare (?) Plaut. Stich. Accius i. and ii. (? Gloss, i.) eliminari Enn.Med. exul, Acc.Phoen.and Meleag. Cicero i. elidere M.Tull. Rep. II 293 excipere (?)M.Tull. Rep. IV Sallust. evadere (?)Sall.Jug.bell. 56 2 94 explorare ' (?) Virg. G. 1 1 7 5 exercere (?)Sall.Jug.bell. 7 1 and M.Tull. Off. I Virgil. 295 equitem Virg. G. HI 116 exterritum Virg. G. Ill 434 experiri (?) Virg. A. I 8 The example from Cic. Rep. I may be inserted from 85. 17. t Should this lemma follow exercere ? 70 Nonius Marcellus 296 exire expedire 297 enixa efFerre 298 explere educere excutere (?) Virg. A. II 496 (?) Virg. A. Ill 378 and II 632 Virg. A. Ill 327 and 391 (?) Virg. A. V 424 and 443 (?) Virg. A. VI (?) Virg. A. X (?) Virg. A. XI Terence. 299 exponere (?) Tar. Heaut. 629 exornare (?) Ter. Heaut. 950 and Eun. Cicero iv. explicare M .Tull. in Verr. act. (Div.) Lucilius ii. 300 exui excidere " eiectum exultare " 301 eligere excludere ' excidere, dissentire (300. 18) (?)Lucil. XXIX (?)M.Tull.Phil. XII Lucil. XXIX Lucil.XXX,M. Tull. Rep. II and frag. inc. Lucil. XXIX Lucil. XXVII Lucil. XXVII Cicero v. expectare M. Tull. Off. II Plautus ii. expetere Plaut. Amph. 174 and 495 F-Section. Gloss, i. felix 302 fastigium ferre 303 fluere fatum 304 fatigare foeduni factio ferox 305 fama 306 fortis faces sere Virg. Virg.G.II.Varr. R.R. I Virg. etc. Virg. A. Virg. 293 Virg. Virg. VII VII A. 618, Ter. Eun. Titin. Setina Titin. Fullon. Virg. A. IV, Ter. Adelph. (?) Plaut. Mil. Enn. Ann. I, Enn. Eum., Titin. Gemina Accius i. ii. 307 fatiscere ferus fuga 308 frigit Ace. Epinaus. (?) Ace. Medea (?)Acc. Teleph. Ace. Meleag. (bis) (friguttire Plaut. Cas.) Lucilius i. fingere (?) (Lucil. Sat.) VIII Sallust. 309 facinus 310 furtum fiducia fatigare Sail. Cat. bell. 2 and 23 (?)Sall.(Hist.)I Sail. (Hist.) II M.Tull.Off.III, Virg. A. I 280 frigus Virgil. (?) Virg. VIII Buc. " Should this lemma follow explicare? Perhaps from note on insultare Lucil. XXIX. (ap. Non. 330. 2d). Dictionary of Mepul>lican Latin. 71 311 ferire (?) Virg. Buc. IX fovere (?) Virg. A. I 18 312 fetum (?)Virg. A. 151 fasces (?) Virg. G. Ill fundere (?)Virg. A.I 192 Lucilius ii. 313 filum Virg. A. X and Lucil. XXIX flagitium Lucil. XXIX Cicero v. fides M. Tull. Hort. Plautus ii. facere Plaut. Aul. G-Section. Gloss, i. grave (?) Titin. Psalt. (graviter,Caecil. Ploc.) Sallust. hiare Sail. Hist. IV, Virg. G. II 508 Virgil. 319 horrendum (?) Virg. G. II 387 haurire (?) Virg. G. Ill and IV 426 320 honor (?) Virg. G. IV 326 I-Section. Gloss, i (or Plautus i?) invitare (?) Virg. G. I 302, Plaut. Am ph. 321 iuxta (?) Sail. Jug. bell., Plaut. Trin. 322 insolens" (?) Ter. Andr., Pac. Atal. 316 grassari Titin. Velit. garrulae Varr. Peripl. I Naev. Lye. ingenium Naev. Lye. Pacuvius. Accius i. gemini Virg., Pacuv. Herm. 323 immane Ace. Medea gerere y Virg. Pomponius. Cicero iii. intestatus Pomp. Pictores gradus M. Tull. Off. I Accius ii. Lucilius ii. invadere Aee. Atham. 317 gestire Virg. G.I, Lucil. XXX Lucilius i. 324 iubere Lucil. Sat. VI H-Section. Gloss, i. Cicero i. impurus M. Tull. Rep. Ill herba Virg. habere Virg. etc. 318 habitare Varr. Serm. Lat. Ill Varro i. imbuere Varr. Syneph., Ace. Philoct. y Possibly belongs to Virgil series and should follow gradus. 2 Cf. insolum, ' insolituin' in 'Gloss, i' series, 124. 19. Nonius Marceiius' ilico " 325 ignoscite iter Pacuv. Medus, Caecil. Noth. Nicas., Turpil Leuc. Naev. Bell. Poen. VI, Ace. Eurys., Hemina Hist. I Varr. Gloria Ter. Hec. Sallust. innocens Sail. Jug. Virgil. indulgere (?) Virg. G. II 276 and 344 326 inane (?) Virg. G. Ill 170 iacet (?) Virg. G. Ill 354 and 343 327 improbum (?) Virg. G. Ill 430 iacere (?) Virg. G. IV 294 iactari (?) Virg. A. I 227 and 29 328 involvere (?) Virg. A. II interpres Virg. A. III359 and IV 608 imponere Virg. A. IV 453 and 639 intentum Virg. A. V 136 and 137 329 imago Virg. A. VII 179 increpat (?)Virg. A. VIII 527 Cicero iv. invehi M. Tull. ad Caes. iun. Ill intendere M. Tull. de suppl. (Verr. II, V) Lucilius ii. 330 immittere Lucil. XXX inducere Lucil. XXIX, XXX, XXVII and XXVI insultare Lucil. XXIX interficere Lucil. XXIX and XXVIII interpellare Lucil. XXVIII 331 ire Lucil. XXVIII insigne Lucil. XXVII Plautus ii. inpedire Plant. Amph. L-Section. Gloss, i. laevum Virg. lac Titin. Psalt. legere (?) Titin. Velit. Plautus i. 333 lustra Plant. Asin. linguere Virg. limare Plant. Bacch. 334 liquidum (?) Plaut. Cas. 335 laudare Plant. Capt. lustrare (?)Plaut. Pseud. Novius. 336 liraen Nov. Mace, exul Accius ii. levare (?) Ace.Meleag., 337 lautum (?) Ace. Stas. vel Trop. Lucilius i, Cicero i. lentum (?) Lucil. Sat. I, and M. Tull. Rep. V Accius iii. ' locum, de- cus'(34i- 16) Ace. Diom. " Has this lemma been inserted here from the ' Alph. Adverb.' list in suite ■jl the extra-quotation to imiuere from Ace. Philoct. (taken ftom the 'Alph. Verb. ' list) ? ' iDictwnary of Republican Latin. n Cicero iii. languor'' M. Tull. Off. I 123 339 longum (?) M. Tull. Off. I 69 luxuria M. Tull. Off. I 106 340 laxum M. Tull. Off. I 139 Virgil. locandum (?) Virg.A.1427 laetum (?) Virg.A.I 590 341 lassum Virg. A. IX (?) Gloss, iii. locus Ace. Eurys., Ace. Diom. M-Section. (?) Gloss, i. (macte Virg.A. IX, Cie. Tusc. I) Plautus i. maetare Plaut. Amph. 342 modicum 343 mitis mater Plaut. Bacch. Plaut. Mil. Plaut. Men. Pomponius. 344 merum Pomp. Piseato- Lucilius i. meret (?) Lucil. XV Sat. 345 346 Varro i. mediea- mentum Varr. Trepi J|ay. minutum Cie. Fin. I malignum Virg. (?) Cicero iii. molin (?)M.Tull.OffiI molle 347 mirari micare 348 mittere mandare 349 maturum metus manere 350 monstrum Virgil. (?)Virg. G. Ill 41 and II 470 Virg. G. Ill 49 and IV 215 Virg. G. Ill 84 and A. I 90 (?) Virg. G. Ill 323andA.I 202 (?) Virg. A. Ill 50 (?) Virg. A. V Virg. A. VII 60 and VI 276 (?)Virg. A.VII 596 Virg. A. Ill 59 and 658 Cicero iv, Lucilius ii. rnaculosum M. Tull. Verr. act. I, de suppl. Verr. (II v) and Lucil. XXX Lucilius ii. metiri Lucil. XXX manieae Lucil. XXX maestum Lucil. XXIX (bis) 351 rautare Lucil. XXVI (ter) Cicero v. movere M.Tull. Off. Ill Plautus ii. meditari Ter. Plaut. Andr. Amph. N-Section. (?) Gloss, i. nobile (nobilitarent, Titin. Prilia) ^ Has this lemma been transposed from its proper place after hixuria, below, through a scribe's confusion of languor with longum > ° Should this lemma follow mandare, above? Nonius MarccUus^ Accius i. 352 numero (?J Ace. Oenom. Pacuvius. 353 niti (?)Pacuv.Perib. (?) Gloss, ii. nare Virg. Sallust. necessitudo Sail. Jug. bell, and Cat Virgil. 354 nomen Virg. A. II nota Virg. A. V 87 nudum Virg. A. V 871 and 13s 0-Section. Gloss, i, Plautus i. occupatus Plant. Amph. and Cic. Tusc. V, Titin. Velit. Accius. 356 opinio (?)Varr.Eum.'^, Ace. Eurys. obscenum Ace. Oenom. and Astyan. 357 obitus Ace. Antig. omen Virg. Lucilius i. dim Virg.A.I,Lucil. Sat. XIX 358 optare Lucil. Sat. XIX Turpilius, Pacuvius. offendere Turp. Parater, and Pacuv. II- iona Cicero iii. 359 obscurum M. Tull. Off. I 116 observare (?) M. Tull. Off. I 149 ■* Possibly insert " Have these two lem (?) Virgil. 360 oratores Virg. A XI Cicero iv. occurrere M. Tull. de suppl. (Verr.II, Lucilius ii. offerre Lucil. XXIX and XXVI obducere Lucil. XXIX Cicero v, 361 orare M. Tull. Off III Plautus ii. oppido Plant. Amph. oppetere Plaut. Asin. (?) Gloss, iii. obesum Laevius Carm. P-Section. (?) Gloss, i. proprium Sis. Hist. IV, Plaut. Cist. (Most.), Virg., Ter. Andr. Plautus i. 362 praevertere Plaut. Amph. 527 and 1068 promittere Plaut. Rud. Turpilius. 363 protelare'' (?) Turp. Lemn. Lucilius i. prodere'= (?) Lucil. Sat. V Cicero i. 364 periculum (?) Sis. Hist. IV, M. Tull. Rep. Ill ed from 242, 30. mas been transposed? Dictionary of Repuhiican Latin. 75 Sallust. pressum Virg. 365 pretium Liv. Ach., Sail. Jug. bell. 366 patibulum Sail. Hist. Ill, Titin. Fullon. Virgil. petere (?) Virg.Buc.III 367 propter (?) Virg. G. Ill 13 ponere (?)Virg. G. Ill 13 and 403 368 pernix Virg. G. Ill 230 and 92 pullum (?)Virg. G. Ill 389 and 75 plagae (?) Virg. A. I and IV 369 putare (?)Virg. A. VI 332 370 piare Virg. A. VI 379, 153 and 569 passum ' Virg. parcere (?) Virg. A. VI 853 pax (?) Virg. A. VII 371 praestare Virg. M. Tull. Off. Ill 65 and 66 piums Virg.G.III 513, A. VI 662 372 praecipere Virg. A. XI 491 and 328 pulsatum Virg. A. XII Terence. 373 producere Ter. Adelph. 314, 402, and Heaut. 144 proluvies Ter. Adelph. 985 and Heaut. 294 Cicero iv. proiectum M. Tull. design, and Phil. IV (Verr. II iv, 21) E Possibly from a note on Aen. VI 42 h Cf. rogare, p. 383 M. ' 374 praestrin- M.Tull. de sign, gere and Phil II (Verr.IIiv,io5) poscere ' Varr. Virg. Parm.. Lucilius ii. proferre M. Tull. Rep. III, Lucil. XXVII Alph. Verb. penetrare Plant. Trin. Alph. Adverb. pariter Novius Dec., Titin. Prilia, Afran. Omen, Afran. Abducta, Pacuv. Niptr. Plautus ii. 375 posterius Plaut. Asin. 63 postulare Plaut. Asin. 506 (?) Gloss, iv. paret Virg. Cicero viii. portenta Cic. Tusc. I Gloss. V. 376 protinus Afran. Epist., Plaut. Astraba, Plaut. Cure, Naev. Colax, Varr. L.L. VII, Virg. G. IV, etc., Sisenna ' Hist. I, IV, Tu- bero Hist. I, Virg. Aen. X, etc. 378 plaga Virg. A. VII, IV, Pacuv. Atal. Varr. Prom., Afran. (inc.) I or 740. B Cf. piare, above. Possibly from the ' Sisenna ' list. 76 Nonius Marceilus' parumper Virg. A. VI, (?) Gloss, iii-v. Enn. Ann. I 38s rumor Sail. Hist. II, (bis) Virg. A. VIII, Fenestella Ann. R-Section. XXII, Enn. Ann. VII Gloss, i. restare Ter.Andr.,Virg. S-Section. A. IV. religio Varr. Anthrop. (?) Gloss, i. 379 rarum Virg. sublatum Virg. ruere Virg. 386 sufficit Virg., etc. 380 rigidum Virg. relatum Virg. A. XI suspensum M.Tull. inVerr. (pro Rabirio) Plautus i. species segne (?) Liv. Aegisth. Virg. 381 reddere (?) Plaut. Aul. 387 saltus Virg. and Most. subiecere Virg. rami, ' na- servare Virg. vales pe- 388 supremum Virg. des ' ^ Virg. A. V saevum Virg. Lucretius. superare Virg., etc. 389 stratum Virg. Virg. referre (?) Lucr. I secundum Pacuvius, Virgil. 39° submissum (?) M. Tull. Off. I 124 Virg., etc. Virg., etc. 382 rimari Virg. Pacuv. severum Atal. and lliona solvere Terence. 391 superbum Virg. rumpere (?) Ter. Hec. and Eun. 392 stare spissum (?) Titin. Velit. Caecil.Dardan., Titin. Gemina, Cicero iv. Afran. Incend., 383 rogare M. Tull.Verrin. Afran. Matert. divin., ad Caes. Plautus i. iun. I and Phil. II 393 statim (?) Plaut.Amph. 239 and 276 Lucilius ii. superstites (?) Plaut. Asin. remissum (?) Lucil.XXIX 16 recipere (?) Lucil.XXIX spurcum Afran. Divert, 384 redundare Lucil. XXVIII Plaut. Asin. 80 7 redire Lucil. XXVII 394 siccum Plaut. Asin. 857 395 seges (?) Plaut.Aul.4S (?)Alph. Adverb'. 396 sumere (?) Plaut. Aul. rursus (?) Enn. An- 674 drom. sufferre Plaut. Cas. ■^ From note on Plaut. Men. 350. Cf. 461. 31. ' Possibly still Lucilius ii. Cf. 165. 9 s.v. reciproca. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 77 397 surgere Virg. G. I, Sail. Hist. V sacrum (?) Plaut. Poen. Accius i. 398 saucii Ace. Phoen. Accius ii. supplicium (?) Ace. Epig. Lucilius i. Samium Lucil. Sat. VII and XIII Ennius. 399 spernere Enn. Hect. lytr. Turpilius. subducere Turp. Lind. and Parater. Varro i. 400 stupidus Varr. -ntpi l^ay. Sallust. suspicere Sail. Jug. Virgil. subigere (?) Virg.A.I 266 401 summum (?) Virg. A. II 402 spectare Virg. G. I 158, etc. stringere (?) Virg. A. VIII 62 403 succedere Virg. A. VIII 123 subit (?)Virg.A.VIII 362 and IX 344 404 secare Virg. A. X 107 and IX 102 squalidum Virg. A. X 314 Terence, scitum Ter. Andr. sedet Virg. A. V 418 Cicero iv. sustulit M. TuU. Phil. X Lucilius ii. spargere Lucil. XXIX 405 signare Lucil. XXIX (bis) Varro ii. solidi Varr. Sesq. Gellius. subnixum ( = Gell. XVII ii. 4"") T-Section. Gloss, i. tandem Titin. Gemina 406 tamen toga Plaut. Rud. Titin. Gemina and Fullon Plautus i. tollere (?) Plaut. Poen. Ennius. 407 tenacia Enn. Hect. lytr. tempestas Sail. Jug. 408 trepidare" Virg. A. IX 114 and 418 Turpilius. tangere (?) Turpil. Be- rn etr. Varro i. 409 triste (?)Varr.Trihod. Tripyl. Cicero ii. 410 trahere (?)M.Tull.Deor. Nat. II Virgil. tardum (?) Virg. G. II 126 tendere Ter. Phorm., Virg. m The two (one ?) Virgil quotations are added by Nonius, n Perliaps inserted here from the 'Virgil' list along with extra-quotations to tangere from A. IX. 78 Nonius Marcellus 411 turpe tenerum tenue 412 tenet tremere trahere temptare 413 taetrum (?) Virg. G. Ill 51 and 299 Virg. G. Ill 326 (?)Virg. G. Ill 33S (?)'Virg. G. IV ^21 and 483 Virg. A. II 199 Virg. A. II 508 and II 550 (?) Virg. A. VIII (?) Virg. A. X Terence. torquere (?) Ter. Eun. Cicero iv. tueri M. TuU. Epist. adCaes. I, Virg. Lucilius ii. 414 tergora (?)LuciI. XXVIII transmittereLucil. XXVIII Plautus ii. temerarium Plant. Asin. tegetes taleas Varro ii. Varr. R.R. I 22 Varr. R.R. I 40 U-Section. Gloss, i. volare Ter. Hec. 415 vastum° (?) Cic. de Or. (I) Plautus i. ventus Plant. Cist, virtus Plant. Mil. 676 and 728 Lucretius. vesci (?) Lucr. V Pomponius. 4t6 velare Pomp. Pannuc. vola Varr. Epitapti. Cicero i. vanum (?) M. TuU.) Rep. V Varro i. 417 vastitas Varr.Prora.Lib. Cicero iii. nltimum (?) M.Tull.Off.I Virgil. 418 urguere (?) Virg. G. II vincere (?) Virg. G. Ill 289 and 17 vertere (?) Virg A. II 419 vindicare • (?)Virg. A. IV usus (?) Virg. A. VIII vita Virg. A. VI venire Virg. A. VII 420 verrere (?) Virg. A. Ill via Virg. A. X vestigium Virg. A. V Lucilius ii. volutari Lucil.XXX(bis) vis Lucil. XXVI (?) Alph. Adverb. vix (?)Virg. (Aen.) II Results of Analysis of Books II — IV. It is plain from the foregoing analysis that the 're-arranged' books retain the characteristic features of the others, and that their evidence must not be neglected in determining the proper Cf. vastitas, below. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 79 sequence of the fragments of lost Republican literature ; although some sections of Book III especially are too small to be of service, and in Book IV the attainment of certainty in our analysis is hindered by a good many things. One of these hindrances however may be something of a help. I refer to the way in which a lemma is occasionally broken up in our MSS. For example, the concluding part (256. 36-41) of the lemma comparare (255. 30- 256. 41) appears in our MSS. in three portions, separated from the rest of the lemma : viz. vv. 36-37 after 257. 10, vv. 38-39 after 258. 16, vv. 39-41 after 262. 36. The last editor of Nonius, Prof. Lucian Mueller, has made a practice of treating almost every caseP of the kind in Book IV as a mere scribal error, and has reunited all these straggling portions with the main body of the lemma. Undoubtedly there was every temptation for a scribe to omit part of the lemmas in this book, for they consist of a number of clauses, each beginning with the same word, e.g. Comparare est sociare, adiungere .... Comparare, adaequare .... Comparare, componere, machinari, and so on. A scribe's eye would readily wander from the word comparare in one line to the same word a few lines below, with the result that the intervening portion would be omitted. The reviser of the MS. would add the omitted portion in the top or bottom margin of the page; and when the MS. came to be copied, the reviser's addition would be written in a wrong part of the text. In the case of 257- 36-37 Comparare iteruni aestimare, etc., the word iterum shews us that these lines must have originally formed part of the whole lemma and could not have been set down by Nonius in the place in which our MSS. offer them, viz. in the middle of the lemma Componere. The text presented by our MSS. is clearly wrong: Componere, lenire. VergiHus Aen. lib. I Sed motos praestat componere fluctus. Comparare iterum aestimare. Accius Epinausimache Proin tu id cui fiat, non qui facias, compara. Componere, disponere, constituere, etc. At the same time it is rash to assume that Nonius never made the mistake of entering one or two meanings of a word from one of his lists in oblivion of the fact that he had entered other meanings of the same word from a previous list. We have already found instances in the P Not, e.g., elidere p. 291 and 292, dignatus p. 281 and dignari p. 286, plague p. 368 and plaga p. 378, trahere p. 410 and p. 412. In other books he tolerates these repetitions, e.g. (Book \) fora etfori-p- 428 and p. 447. 8o Nonius Marcellus' other books of the same word being entered from different Hsts at different parts of the book ; for, as we have seen, there is practi- cally no indication of Nonius' dictionary having been subjected to any process of revision before publication. And in point of fact one or two of these isolated portions of lemmas in Book IV give clear indication of having been set down by Nonius himself in the place which they occupy in our MSS., for their ' leading-quotation ' comes from a list which is precisely the list that should follow in order of sequence at this particular point. Some clear cases of genuine repetitions of this kind I have indicated in the analysis above. Unfortunately it is not possible in each and every case of repetition to obtain clear evidence of genuineness or the reverse. This leads to another question. How far can we posit a regular order of sequence in Nonius' employment of his various lists, and use this as a means of detecting transpositions and omissions in our MSS. ? At first sight there would seem to be no reason why Nonius should not have varied the order in the different books, taking up one list or another as his fancy directed him. But when we look at the actual analysis of the whole work, we are struck with the great regularity with which the lists follow each other ; first the ' Gloss, i.' list, with its characteristic quotations from Titinius, &c., then the ' Plautus i' Hst, then the 'Lucretius' list, then the others in the order in which I have enumerated them on pp. 7 sqq., and finally the 'Varro v' list with quotations from Varro's ' Vita Populi Romani ' and ' Catus.' That Nonius should have omitted occasionally to consult one or more of his lists is also likely enough on a priori considerations. But how far do the facts attest this ? It would of course be absurd to regard every case of absence of representatives of this or that list from this or that book as a proof that something had been omitted in the archetype of our MSS. In Book X, De Mutatis Conju- gationibus, there is hardly opportunity for the use of list no. 28 (from a Glossary of Adverbs) ; in Book XI, De Indiscretis Adver- biis, no. 27 (from a Glossary of Verbs) could not well be repre- sented. We cannot be surprised that in this or that book (e.g. Book XVIII, de Genere Ciborum, Book XIII, de Genere Navigiorum) Nonius found nothing available in certain of his lists ; and indeed we can see from his use of Gellius' ' Noctes Atticae ' how capricious and superficial was his selection even from ample materials. We need not wonder if in Book I he seems to take from Virgil a word Dictionary of Republican Latin. 8i here and a word there so as to make a small alphabetical sequence, or if in Book II, S-Section (172-3), the use of Plautus (i.e. 'Plautusi') is limited to a few words ending in -tudo. Often indeed the absence of a list is more apparent than real. Nos. 2 (' Plautus i ') and 41 (' Varro v '), which generally shew themselves near the beginning and at the end of a book, are not really absent from Book XIX, de Genere Armorum. From the first Nonius took catapulta (Plaut. Capt.), from the second, rorarii (Varro V.P.R. Ill), but finding these lemmas already entered, the first from list no. i, the second from list no. 9, he merely appended the quotation from Plaut. Capt. and the quotation from Varro V.P.R. Ill to the quotations which he had already entered from Hst no. i (Plaut. Cure, Titinius Setina) and no. 9 (Lucil. VII, Lucil. X). The extra-quotations in a book thus attest the use of a list which has failed to supply the leading - quotation of any- lemma. That these extra-quotations were accumulated as Nonius went through his various lists, is certain. For they follow the same order as the lists themselves. Suppose the first extra-quotation to be from hst no. 2 (' Plautus i '), the next will be from list no. 3 (' Lucretius '), or, if Lucretius fails to supply a suitable quotation, from the next Hst, and so on. Now this method of procedure seems to help us to judge rightly the cases of abnormal sequence of the lists. If in any particular book the order of the lemmas with their primary quotations violates the normal sequence observed by Nonius in his use of his lists, and if the order in which the extra-quotations present themselves shews precisely the same deviation, then we can rest assured that the deviation i sdue to Nonius himself, who, for some reason or other, took up one list before, instead of after, another. But if the extra- quotations in the book follow the normal order, then we must examine whether the order of the lemmas has not been transposed by some accident in the transmission of the text, such as tlie detachment of a leaf or the omission (and subsequent insertion at a wrong place) of the contents of a page. This new clue to the textual criticism of the ' Compendiosa Doctrina' must therefore be made available before we attempt to apply the knowledge we have already gained by the examination of the leading quotations of the lemmas. We must examine the extra-quotations too. To go through the extra-quotations of all the books would take too much space. I shall content myself with giving as a specimen the analysis of the extra-quo- G 82 Nonius Marcellus' tations of Book I and of the other Books (excluding II-IV) where the number of extra- quotations is sufficiently large to make an analysis profitable. The exira-qvotations "^ in Books 7, V-X. Book I. I senmm 3 velitatio phrygiones 4 tolutim capulum 5 temulenta (S) Ace. Epi- naus., (6) Pomp. Praec. post., (9) Lucil. Sat. XV, (ii)Turp.Dem., (12) Pac. Perib. (aetas mala (5) Acc.Amph.,(ii) Turp. Philop., (i2)Pac.Perib., (19) Afran. Vop.) (2) Plant. Men., (11) Turp. Lind., (19) Afran. Priv., (27 ?) Caecil. Pausim. (2?) Plaut. Men ,(is)Varr. Cosm. (7)Nov.Gallin., Mace. ex.. (9) Lucil. SatVIII, (iS)Varr.Trih. trip., (28?) Pomp. Dec. full., (31) Varr. Agath. (7) Nov. Papp. praet.,(9)Lucil. Sat. II, (is) Varr. Cosm. (13) M. Tull. cinaedi 6 exercitus pelicis calvitur ' 7 frigere tricae 9 mutus Rep. IV, (15) Varr. Est mod., (33) Varr. Mo- dius (9)Lucil. Sat. I, (33) Varr. "Oras Xupas (3) Lucr. II, (19) Afran. Susp.,(22)Virg. Ill (this word re- curred in no. 32 and Nonius re-wrote the paragraph with the help of Cell, IV iii. 3) (5) Ace. Eurys., (9) Lucil. Sat, XVII,(i2)Pac. Dulor., (18) Sail. Hist. Ill (31) Varr. Virg, div., (33) Varr. 'Ovos \vpas (9) Lucil. Sat. XI, (11) Turp. Demiurg.,(i9?) Afran. Epist., (31) Varr. Ge- ront. (5) Ace. Epi- naus. 10 inlexetexlex (9) Lucil. Sat. 1 To save space I indicate by numerals, not by the titles hitherto used, the lists from which the extra-quotations have come. Thus the number '(i)' represents ' Gloss, i ' ; the number '(2)' represents ' Plautus i,' etc. See the table of lists on p. 7. I do not take account of single extra-quotations, where these may have come from a note on the line which forms the leading-quotation. ■■ The two quotations from Pac- Medus come from the note on Plaut. Cas. 169. Diction.iiy of RtpubUcan Litin. lurcones 12 vestispici suppilare 13 crepera 14 extorns 15 enoda 16 lactare succussare II, (is) Varr. Sciam., (25) Lu- cil. XXX, (26?) Caec. Harpaz., (36) SisennalV, (38?) M. Tull. pro Clu. (9) Lucil. Sat. V, (31) Varr. Eum. (lurcare (9) Lucil. Sat. II, (27?) Pom- pon. Syr.) (i9)Afran.'Vop., (35 ?) Varr. Papp. (27?) Caecil. Naucl., Pomp. Sarc. (5)Acc.Phoen., Teleph.,(9) Lu- cil. Sat. V, (12) Pac.Dulor.,(3o) Plaut. Asin., (31) Varr. Myst. (ii)Turp.Lemn., (18) Sail. Jug. bell., (22) Virg. Aen. IV (lo) Enn. Teleph., (11) Turp. Demetr., (r2) Pacuv. Perib., (34) M. Tull. Fin. V, (4i)Varr.V.P.R. I (12?) Pacuv. Iliona, (27?) Caec. Hyp. Rastr., Ace. Alcm.,(33)Varr. "Oms'Kvpas, (39) Cic. Tusc. IV (9) Lucil. IV, XV 17 adulatio manducones 18 delirare rutrum nebulones 19 evannetur vafrum 20 clepere cernuus 21 caries 22 gliscit 23 moenes 83 (20) Cic. Off. I, (2 7?)Lucr.,Acc. Prom. (2S?)Lucil.,(33) Varr. Bimarc. (25) Lucil. XXVI, (30) Plaut. Amph. (9) Lucil. Sat. IX, (is) Varr. Marcop. (9) Lucil. Sat. XIV,XX, (14?) Afran. Epist., (is) Varr. Pap. pap., (31) Varr. Geront. (9) Lucil. Sat. VII, IX, (40) Varr. R.R. I (13) M. Tull. Rep. Ill, (19) Afran. Divort. Plaut. Pseud. % (13) M. Tull. Rep. IV, (12) Pac. * Herm., (is) Varr. Oc- tog. (22) Virg. X, (2s) Lucil. Sat. XXVII, (41) Varr. V.P.R. I (11) Turp. Leuc, (19) Afran. Priv. Acc.Aeneadae", (i2)Pac.Perib., (18) Sail. Hist. Ill, (22) Virg. (Aen.)XII,(29) M. Tull. Hort., (3o)Plaut.Asin. (18) (Sail. Jug. bell.), (25) Lu- cil. XXVI s From a note on the line of Acciut ? ' Should this precede the Cicero- quotation? ^ From note on Turpil. Philop., the leading-quotation. G 3 84 Nonius Marcellus' procacitas 24 portitores 27 exodium 28 compedes 29 pedetetnptim mediocritas 30 dirum 30 exordium inops 31 sudum irritare (2 3)Ter. Hec, (27?) Liv. Aegisth. Plaut. Men. ", (2o)M.Tull.0ff. I, (23) Ter. Phorm., (30) Plaut. Asin., Virg. VI^ (31) Varr. Myst. (31) Varr. Ta(^. Mev. Varr. Flaxt. % (3i)Varr.Parm., Varr. Sesq. (25) Lucil. XXVII, (28?) Quadrig. Ann., Caelius.Ann.VI (25) Lucil. XXVII, (28?) Ter. Andr. (39) Cic. Tusc. Ill (29) M. Tull. Sen. M.Tull. Hort. % (25) Lucil. XXIX, (26?) Cic. Tim., (33) Varn'Oras Xipas Virg.G. I''(23) Ter. Adelph., (29) M. Tull. Off. II Plaut. Mil. <=, (25) Lucil. XXIX Virg. Xd, Sail. Hist. I-i, (25) Lucil. XXVIII, (30) Plaut. Amph., (31) Varr. Sesq. 34 praestringere 37 impertire 40 supersedere 43 viritim concinnare 51 laevum 53 vestibula bidentes 54 recepticium 55 arcera colinam 56 infans 66 politiones praeficae 67 proletarii (29) M. Tull. Sen., (31) Varr. Andab., (34) Cic. Fin. IV (2 7?)Nov. De- cuma, M. Tull. Rep.V, M.Tull, ad Hirt. V (36) Sis. Hist. IV (30) Plaut. Aul., (41) Varr. V.P.R. I (34) M. Tull. Fin. IV, (39) id. Acad. I (26) or (38) Enn. Ann. Ill (37) Cic. Orat. (38 ?) Laber. Paupert. (37) Cic. de Or. II (35 ?) Varr. Geront. Plaut. Most. ", (41) Varr. V.P.R. I Ace. Atham ', (37) Cic. de Or. Ill (41 ?) Varr. (41) Varr. V.P.R. IV (41) Varr. V.P.R. I Book V. 422 horrendum (5) Ace. Medea, et horri- (9) Lucil. Sat. dum XVI, (13) M. Tull. Rep. I, ^ From a note on the Cic. Rep. passage ? J From a note on the line Plaut. Asin. ? ^ From a note on the leading-quotation ? * From a note on Viig. Aen. IV 284? ^ From a note on Virg. Aen. VIII 100? " From a note on the leading-quotation? ^ From a note on the line of Ter. Phorm. ? " From a note on the line of Varr. Modius, the leading- quotation ? ' Possibly inserted from 416. 14. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 8S 423 pudet et piget 425 fors et for- tuna IV,(3sA)Varr. Epist. ad Caes., (36) Sisenna Hist. IV (8)Acc.Neopt., Ace. Androm., (11) Turp. De- metr., (12) Pac. Dulor.,(i8)Sall. Jug. bell., (31) Varr. Parm. (9) Lucil. Sat. XIII, (35. A) Varr. Epist. ad Fuf. ferusetferox(i8) Sail. Jug. bell., (22) Virg. Aen. 11, III (13) M. TuU. Rep. I, (24) M. Tull. ad Caes. iun. Ill (11) Turp. De- metr.s, (?)Varr. Arm. iud. s, Lu- cil. Sat. XX, (i9)Afran.Vop., (29) M. Tull. Hort., (37) id. de Or. (12) Pacuv. Atal, (13) M. Tull. Rep. I, II, (36) Sisenna (31) Varr. Sexag., (?) Se- renus Opusc ^ (39) Cic. Tusc. V, (38 ?) et de Off. (22) Virg. G. III, Varr. Ti- thon. ' (29) M. Tull. Sen.,(3o)Plaut. Aul. anticus et antiquior 427 pnores et primores 429 urbs et civitas 431 merx et mercatura 433 luventus et iuventa morata et morosa 441 festinare et Virg. IV, id. properare Aen. II '^ Book VI. 455 rostrum rictum 457 catuli (7) Nov. Pae- dium, (9) Lucil. Sat.V, IX, (is) Varr. Peripl. II, Varr. Serr. (6) Pomp. Pros- tib., (9) Lucil. Sat. Ill, (is) Varr. Pap. pap. (3) Lucr. V, (9) Lucil. Sat. IV, VII Book VII (I) Active Voice Section. 467 aucupavi vagas 468 meret auspicavi 469 auguro (S) Ace. Asty., Ace. Medea SerenusOpusc ', (?) Pacuv. Me- dus,Acc.Bacch., Turp. Leue.,(s) Ace. Tereus, Ace. Medea, (lo)Enn.Hect. lytr.,(i2)Pacuv. Perib., (is) Varr. Pseud. Apoll., (31) Varr. Here. t. f. (11) Turp. Phi- lop., Turp. Het. (27 ?) Atta Lu- cubr., Caeeil. Ploc, Naev. Bell. Poen. IV (27?) Enn.Me- lan., Pacuv. Chrys., Cic. ad Calvum, Virg. A.VII, M. Tull. Rep. IV i Perhaps from notes on the two Lucilius passages. "^ See section vii. ' Inserted from 123. 6? ^ These Virgil-quotations may have been added by Nonius himself. See section vii. ' See section vii. &6 jVo/n'i/s Marcellui' cunctant contempla Enn. Ambr. ", (lo)Enn. Hect. lytr. (2t) Danae, Titin. Enn. Naev. (27?) Fullon. Medea, 471 populat (3o)Plaut.Asin. (27?) Caecil. Asot., Enn. Ambr., Quad- rig., Ace. As- tyan., (36) Sis. Hist. IV (II) Passive Voice Section. 477 manduca- (9) Lucil. Sat. tur rixat adiutatur 478 nutritur et 480 sacrifican tur IV, XIV, (19) Afran. Fratr. (15) Varr. Serr., (4o)Varr. R.R. I (19) Afran. Inim., (25) Lucil. XXVII (16) M. Tull. nutricatur Deer. Nat. II, (19) Afran. Vop., (25) Lucil. XXX (33) Varr. Ma- nius, (41) Varr. Catus (III) Appended Section. 481 libertatem (7) Nov. Zona, uti (9) Lucil. XIV potior il- (3) Lucr. Ill, lam rem (4) Naev. Ly- curg., (s) Ace. Phoen., (11) Turp.Lind.(?)", (i2)Pacuv.Atal. Book VIII. 482 itiner (2)Plaut.Merc., (3) Lucr. VI, 483 lacte mansuetem quaesti turaulti 484 senati sumpti 485 iteris exerciti 486 ibus 487 vapos (S) Aec. Oe- nom., (8) Ace. Meleag., (11) Turp. Thrasyl. (26?; Caecil. Titthe, (31) Varr. Andab. (8) Ace. Me- leag., (33) Varr. "OvQS \vpas Novius", Ter. Hec.°, _ (6) Pomp. Piston, (ii)Turp.Dem- iurg., Turp. Het., (26) or (38) Caecil. Faener., (41) Varr. Catus Ter.Andr.P, (6) Pomp. Piscat., (8) Ace. Aen. vel Dec., Ace. Nyct. (18) Sail. Catil, bell., (36) Sis. Hist. Ill (bis), (41) Varr. V.P.R. I (11) Turp. Phi- lop., (25) Lucil. XXX, (26 ?) Caecil. Ploc, (33) Varr. Bi- marc. (S) Aec. Oe- nom., Teleph., (i5)Varr.Cygn. (5) Ace. £pi- naus.,(4i)Varr. V.P.R. II (6)Pomp.Papp. agr (4) Naev, Ly- curg., iS) Ace. Androm., (33) Varr. Manius ^1 From note on Ace. Alplies., the leading-quotation. ^ See p. 95* below. " From a note on the line ol Plant. Aul. , the leading-quotation? P Possibly from a note on the line of Plaut. Cas. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 87 488 vulgariam (ii)Turp.Thra- syl., (19) Afran. Privignus 489 nefantia (25) (Lucil.) XXIX, (26) or (35) Varr. Sciam. tumulti (11) Turp. Paed.,(i8)Sall. Catil. bell., (19) Afran. Vop. 490 itiner (12) Pacuv. AtaL, Pacuv. Dulor. 491 soniti et (26?) Caecil. sonu Chalc, (36) Sis. Hist. Ill Book IX. 495 Ace. Sing. (2) Plaut. Pers., pro Gen. (3) Lucr. VI, Plur. Ter. Hec. \ (5) Ace. Eurys., Ace. Epinaus., (7) Nov. Eu- rys., (11) Turp. Epicl., (12) Pacuv. Perib., (15) Varr. Pap. pap., Varr. V.P.R. ^ (Lu- cil.) XVIII \ (18) Sail. Hist. I, (19) Afran. Vop., (29) M. Tull. ©ff. Ill 496 Gen. pro (2) Plaut. AuL, Ace. (9) Lucil. Sat. VII, (11) Turp. Leuc, (25) Lu- cil. XXVIII, (30) Plaut. Aul. (veretur illam rem(i2)Pacuv. Herm., (27) or (38) Atta Gra- tul., Varr. Sard. Venal., Ace. Alphes.) 497 Ace. pro (2) Plaut. Men., Abl. Plaut.Trin.,(9) Lucil. Sat. I, V, (11) Turp. Epicl., Paed., (12) Pacuv. Dulor. Ace. vel (13) M. Tull. Nom. pro Rep. V., (15) Abl. Varr. Cygn., Varr. Prom. Lib., (18) Sail. Hist. II., (19) Afran. Vop., Afran. Fratr., (25) Lucil. XXVI Gen. pro (2)Plaut.Amph., Abl. (6)Pomp.Papp. Agr., (8) Ace. Erigona. (9) Lucil. Sat. VI, VIII, IX, (12) Pac. Perib. ,(13) M. Tull. Rep. Ill, (19) Afran. Except., (41) Varr. V.P.R. II ((2)Plaut.Capt., (18) Sail. Jug. bell., (20) M. Tull. Off 1,(22) Virg. A. I, (29) M. Tull. Hort., (3T)Varr.Eum.) ((2) Plaut. Epid., Plaut. Mil.) 499 Dat. pro (2) Plaut. True, Ace. (8) Ace. Me- leag., (13) M. Tull. Rep. IV, (i8) Sail. Catil bell.,(25)Lucil. "J From a note on the line of Lucr. VI.? "■ Inserted from 544. 9? 88 Nonius Marcellui Ace. pro Gen. 500 Abl. pro Gen. Norei. pro Dat. 501 Gen. pro Dat. 502 Ace. pro Dat. Dat pro Abl. XXVI, (26) or (38)Ter. Andr., (4i)Varr.V.P.R. IV (2) Plaut. Cist., Plaut. Men., (5) Ace. Eurys., Ace. Epinaus., (8)Ace,Atham., Ace. Nyet.,(ii) Turp. Paed., (13) M. Tull. Rep. IV, (is) Varr. Devicti ((S)Aec.Melan., (7) Nov. Paed.) (9) Lucil. Sat. I, VI, (11) Turp. Paed.,(2 2)Virg. G. II (30) Plaut.Aul., (39)Cie.Tusc.I, (4o)Varr.R.R. I (11) Turp. Paed., (22) Virg. Aen. I, (3o)Plaut.Asin., (32) ( = Gell. XX, vi, 9), (37) Cic. de Or. II, (41) Varr. V.P.R. IV (26) or (27) Caecil. Ploc., (30) Plaut. Amph., (35 ?) Virg. A. Ill, (37) Cie.de Or. II (40) Varr. R.R. I, (41) Varr. Catus Book X. fervit (8) Ace. Me- leag., Pomp. Agr. », (19) Af- ran. Priv., (31) Varr. Sexag. (fervere(3)Luer.II, (4) Naev. Ly- curg., (s) Ace. Teleph., (is) Varr. Desult.) 504 lavit (3) Lucr. II, (8) Ace. Phi- nid., (is) Varr. Cosm., (18) Sail. Hist. II (lavere (3) Lucr. V, (5) Aec. Medea, (15) Varr. Anthrop., Varr. Heeat., (19) Afran. Susp.) (laverent (io?)Enn. Androm., (19) Afran. Fra- tr., (30) Plaut. Amph.) sonit (8) Aec. Aen. aut Dec, Ace. Phinid., (10) Enn.Heet.lytr., (i2)Pac.Dulor. 505 sonere (8)Acc.Neopt., Ace. Atreus , (sonunt (10?) Enn. Andr. Aeehm., (12) Pae. Ili- ona) expedibo (27?) Pomp. Vernion., Enn. Eumen. This specimen-analysis of the extra-quotations shews clearly that they follow the order of Nonius' lists and that they were accumu- lated in the manner described on pp. 4, 81. That is why the size ' Inserted from 498. 5 ? Dictionary of Republican Latin. 89 of the lemmas so often gradually diminishes as we proceed through a book. The opening lemmas of a book have a number of lists to draw from, while the closing lemmas have at the most one or two. If several extra-quotations are taken from any particular list, they follow the order of the passages in the text from which Nonius compiled his list ; so that in determining the order of the fragments of a lost author, the evidence of the extra-quotations must not be neglected. This gives us a test to apply to our analysis of the compKcated lemmas of Book IV, in which it is so often hard to pick out the 'leading quotation.' If the quo- tations which we characterize as ' extra-quotations ' belong in- variably to lists that come later in order of sequence than the list which has furnished the ' leading quotation,' then our analysis will stand the test. The question proposed on p. 81 may now be answered. In no case do the extra-quotations confirm an abnormal arrangement of the author-sequences, such as that in the A-Section, and other sections, of Book II. The theory that Nonius in these abnormally arranged sections capriciously departed from his usual order of consulting his lists receives no support from an examination of the order in which the extra-quotations occur. In this respect as in others the extra-quotations tell the same tale of a mechanical uniformity of procedure, which we should associate rather with a merchant's compilation of his ledger than with a scholar's com- position of a learned work. vi. Application of these results to the textual criticism of Nonius. We have now obtained the key to the composition of the Com- pendiosa Doctrina. We have seen with what mechanical regularity Nonius went through his lists one by one in a fixed sequence and set down in the order in which they came to hand the words suitable for the particular book on which he was engaged. To each word he appended the quotation of the sentence from which he had taken it, adding any parallel passage which he might find in the marginal note in his edition of the author. These leading quotations were gradually increased in number by the accessions they received from other lists ; and the accessory quotations ioo were set down in the order in which Nonius came across them. It remains to enquire how far this or that deviation from the go Nonius Marcellns' normal course of procedure entitles us to pronounce a passage to be corrupt, or its airangement to have been accidentally altered in the course of the transmission of the text, and how far passages in our MSS. which are obviously corrupt, or out of place, can be restored by means of our new knowledge of the structure of Nonius' dictionary. The most important question for the textual criticism of the Compendiosa Doctrina is whether Books II— IV took their present arrangement in alphabetical sections from Nonius himself or first received it at a later, say the mediaeval, period. In some of our MSS. we find the whole of the Compendiosa Doctrina re-arranged in alphabetical sequence, and thus made more suitable for use as a dictionary. Was the same process applied some time earlier to the archetype of our MSS. ? The answer to this question will determine whether the title-heading Per Litteras in Books II — IV is as spurious as it seems to be in Book I. I do not know that we have the means of answering the question with certainty. That there has been a re-arrangement of these books can hardly be doubted, for their contents must have been at some time or other un-alphabetical ', unless we are to suppose that Nonius took the pains to go through his forty-one (or forty- three) lists for each of the eighteen sections of all the three books; but I cannot see any clear proof that they were not originally published in their present form. It is true that there is more departure from the normal order of the ' author-sequences ' in the first of the three books than in any other book " of the Compendiosa Doctrina, and it would be a natural result of the interference of a mediaeval editor that at the outset of his re-arrangement the existing order of the lemmas was somewhat violently disturbed. Of course it might be argued that Nonius himself might on occasion have departed from the usual order of consultation of t In a chapter of the ' Noctes Atticae,' XVIII, xi, Gellius defends certain coinages of the poet Furius : lutescere, noctescere, virescere, purpurare, opulesceri, and quotes the lines in which they occur. Nonius has taken as suitable for Book II from his 'Gellius' list the lemmas lutescit (p. 132 M.), noctescere (p. 145 M.), mrescit{p. 188 M.), optiHscere (p. 148 M.). Before the re-arrange- ment of Book II, these lemmas must have stood side by side. The ' Lucilius i' list "supplied hulga, the ' Varro ii' list the same word with different spelling, vulga. The two words are now widely separated, bulga p. 78, vulga p. 187. » In Book VI there is a similar departure, on which see p. 92, below. Dictionary of Repicblican Latin. 91 his lists ; although the striking regularity in this respect in the rest of his Dictionary speaks against this theory. But it seems to me that the facts point rather to the disturbance having been a mere accident in the transmission of the text and not the de- liberate work, either of Nonius himself or of a mediaeval abbot. Section A, for example, of Book II begins at p. 68 M. apparently with a Sisenna-sequence {apud. Sis. Hist. IV ; apisci, Sis. Hist. IV), and is followed by sequences from the later lists, while the list, which Nonius elsewhere uses first, does not come into play until p. 71. The evidence however, such as it is, that is furnished by the extra-quotations in the Book does not favour the view that Nonius really used his Sisenna-list first in compiling this section ; for the extra-quotation from Sisenna to the lemma anwliinini (p. 73) suggests that the Sisenna-list was consulted not at the beginning but later in the series of lists, presumably at its usual place in the series. The Sisenna-list is usually brought under contribution immediately before the list compiled from Cicero Orat. and de Or, (' Cicero vii '). The lemmas taken from that list appear in this section at p. 71 {adtendere, Cic. de Or. I; adcommodat, Cic. de Or. II) and are immediately preceded by the lemma adesum from Sis. Hist. Ill, while the Sisenna-sequence at the beginning of the section is followed by the lemma adipatum from Cic. Orat. Clearly the opening lemmas of the section have been torn away from their proper position at the end of p. 70; and the most natural way to account for the occurrence is to suppose that, after some scribe had omitted them at their proper place, a reviser of the MS. inserted them at the beginning of the section. The clear evidence of accidental disturbance at this part of the MS. makes one inclined to believe that the following sequences too (' Cicero viii ', ' Varro ii ', ' Gellius ', ' Varro iii '), which precede the usual opening sequence (Gloss, i '), owe their place to the same accident, although there are no 'ragged ends' of sequences to shew where the text of the section has been rent. The I-Section of the same book begins (p. 122) with the lemma incurviscere, which is followed by a 'Cicero viii' sequence, after which the usual opening sequence ('Gloss, i') puts in an appearance (p. 123). Now the lemma itrcurviscere (Cic. de Or. Ill) is the ' ragged end ' of the 'Cicero vii' sequence, which appears at p. 130 : iactuosac, Cic. Orat. 125; incisim, Cic. Orat. 213; inportatum, Cic. de Or. I 38 i infitiatores, Cic. de Or. I 168; insigfiite, Cic. de Or. II 3493 Q2 Nonius Marullus^ invitius, Cic. de Or. II 364. Here again we have clear traces that the lemmas with which our MSS. begin the section, had been omitted by some scribe and afterwards inserted by a reviser. The abnormal order of the author-sequences in the P- section perhaps admits of similar explanation \ Our archetype, apparently an early minuscule MS., say of the eighth century, cannot have failed to exhibit more than one instance of transposition on a large scale, the result, let us suppose, of a scribe having accidentally passed over a page or a leaf, the contents of which were afterwards inserted by a reviser either at the beginning of the book or alpha- betical section, or at some other place, or of a loose leaf having been either reversed (so that page i became page 2 and vice versa) or fastened in at a wrong part of the book ''. Minor transpositions of single lines or single lemmas are so common an occurrence in MSS. of this kind that we need have no scruple in resorting to this explanation of an apparent violation ^ The opening lemmas of the S-section are suspiciously like 'Gellius', ' Varro iii', 'Varro ii ', 'Alph. Verb.', ' Alph. Adverb.', 'Cicero iv ' and ' Plaut. ii (i ?) ' lemmas, thrown all together without much trace of arrangement. But see below, section vii. y The traditional arrangement of the lemmas in Book VI lends itself readily to an explanation of this kind. It would be the natural result of a common kind of displacement of the leaves in that archetype, a detached leaf of which in the part containing Book IV has already been mentioned (p. 6). Each leaf of that archetype contained about three pages of Mercier's edition, each page therefore contained about a page and a half of the same. Suppose the fourth, or interior, broadsheet (i.e. 2 leaves, i.e. 4 pages) of a quaternion to have con- tained on its four pages (i) bibere (p. 453 M.) — bicipitem (p. 454), (2) defecata (P- 454)— /«'«« (P- 455)1 (3) equisones (p. 450)— £■&•« et ieiuni (p. 451), (4) ebrii et iehiiii (p. 451) — trans^essus (p. 452); and suppose this broadsheet, after having become loose, to have been inserted before page i of the quaternion and to have been turned inside out previous to this insertion. The order of its pages would then be : (3), {4), (i), (2), producing the order of these lemmas in our MSS. Suppose further the sixth leaf of the quaternion, con- taining on its first page edolarc (p. 448) — interfici el occidi (p. 449), and on its second, interfici et occidi — abdicare (p. 450), to have become loose, to have dropped out, and to have been re-inserted before the inserted broadsheet. Tliese two re-arrangements of the quaternion, which would not be at all unusual occurrences for a mediaeval IMS., would produce exactly the present abnormal arrangement of the lemmas in Book VI. Bibere and libido, the two ' ownerless ' lemmas at the end of the ' Gellius ' sequence, would then belong to the ' Cicero iv' sequence. They are the 'ragged end,' which gives indication of a rent in the original texture of the book. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 93 of the sequence observed by the lemmas of Nonius. The necessity of caution, however, is enforced by instances like the lemma fasti- diliter in the F-Section of Book II (p. 112). It comes at the end of a batch of adverbs taken from the ' Alph. Adverb.' list, a list which Nonius seems to have compiled from a Glossary of Adverbs arranged in true alphabetical sequence. The lemmas taken from this list for this section are : facul, J-amulanter, fliictuatim, foriunatim, frustatim, fastidiliter. The true place of fastidiliter (with quotation of a line of Varro's Menippean Satire ' Cras Credo, Hodie Nihil ') would at first sight seem to be between famulanter and. fltcctuatim. But a reference to 139. 29 suggests that Nonius had entered the quotation on his rough list under the heading mu- tatiliter, an adverb which is found in the same passage of Varro : quibus instabilis animus ardens miitatiliter havet habere et non habere fastidiliter inconstanti pectore, so that it really stood further down on his list than the other adverbs beginning with the letter F. On the other hand no hesi- tation is required in applying our newly discovered tests in defence of the traditional text. For instance the lemma prognariter in the P-Section of the same book (154. 25) has been changed by the last German editor of Nonius, Prof. Lucian Mueller, to praegna- viter, in spite of the fact that the lemma recurs at 150. 5 in the same form, the form likewise exhibited by the MSS. of Plautus in the Hne quoted by Nonius (Persa 588). We now know from the above analysis of contents of Book II that the lemma was taken by Nonius from this 'Alph. Adverb.' Hst. The batch of lemmas from this source is : palaesfricos, populatim, praesente, primiter, prognariter, properatim. The change ol prognariter X.Q praegnaviter would disturb the alphabetical order. A cautious editor will not alter the traditional text of Book XIX, 555. 5-8, with this Virgil- sequence; cetra (Aen. Yll), peltae (Aen. I), gaesa (Aen. VIII), but will content himself with calling attention to the fact that the true place of the lemma peltae may be before, and not after, the lemma cetra. For Nonius may have found the word peltae and its quota- tion from Aen. I in a note on the word cetra in the line quoted from Aen. VII. (Cf. the Plaut. Aul. quotations on p. 541 and p. 549.) These minor cases of transposition, which, after all, are more the concern of an editor of Nonius than of the general student, have been, for a great part, indicated in the notes to the above 94 Nonius Afarcelhis' analyses of contents. I will mention here only one or two illus- trative examples. The lemma toralium in Book I, with quotation from Varr. V.P.R. I, is printed by editors of Nonius at ii. ii, in the middle of a ' Plautus i ' series : . . . inlex et exlex, Persa 407 ; lurcones, Persa 421 ; toralium Varr. V.P.R. I ; conceniuriare, Plaut. Pseud., etc. But in our MSS. it stands in the middle of the lemma inlex et exlex thus : INLEX et EXLEX est qui sine lege vivat. Plautus Persa : inpure, inhoneste, iniure, inlex [torialim et toralium designator est Varro de Vita Populi Romani lib. I, etc.], labes popli. That it stood in the margin of some archetype is clear from the way it has intruded into the text. (The same holds of the lemma fora et fori at p. 428 M.) If two lemmas were written in the margin in the usual straggling fashion of early minuscule, we should expect to find them intruding into the text not merely side by side, as we find paupertas and pandere in the ' Plautus ii ' sequence in Book I (p. 43); vernas, Amph. 179, concinnare, Amph. 529 ; paupertas, Varr. V.P.R. I ; pandere, Varr. V.P.R. I; blatis, Amph. 626 ; percontari, Amph. 710; prodigia, Amph. 739, etc., but also at an interval of one or more lemmas, as we find ador and iu- ^eri in the ' Gellius ' series in the same book (pp. 52-3) : humanifatem, Gell. XIII 17; ador, Varr. R.R. I g;faciem. Cell. XIII 30; vesti- bula, Gell. XVI 5 ; Udentes, Gell. XVI 6 ; iugeri, Varr. R.R. I 10; faenus, Gell. XVI 12, etc. A passage omitted on a page by a scribe would, when the page was revised by the ' corrector ' or by the scribe himself, be entered usually on the bottom margin (or the top margin) of the same page, and the next copyist of the MS., when he had copied the last lines of the actual page, would go on naturally to copy the lines which stood immediately beneath them in the bottom margin. If in the D-Section of Book II a page of some archetype ended with the lemma deletile and the next page began with the lemma deletio, we can understand how it has come about that the lemmas datatim, dividia, dulcitas, dis- corditas, whose proper place is higher up, after the lemma deartuare, stand in our MSS. between deletile and deletio. The sequence here is a ' Lucilius ii " sequence. First comes deblaterare (Lucil. XXX), then deletile (Varr, Modius), then the four intruding lemmas, then deletio (Lucil. XXIX), and depeculasscre (Lucil. XXIX). The lemma deletile came in all appearance from a note on deletio in Dictionary of Republican Latin. 95 the line of Lucil. XXIX ; and we can hardly imagine two cognate lemmas like deletile and deletio being separated from each other by anything but an accident '■. I will now enumerate as briefly as possible some instances in which our new knowledge seems to throw light on textual ques- tions. Near the end of Book VII a part of the lemma potior illam rem, containing an extra-quotation from Turpilius' ' Lindia ' : me VIS potiri ? fac, ego potiar qu6d vole, was omitted by the scribe of some archetype and appears in our MSS. at the end of the following lemma opus est illam rem. Editors, not knowing its exact place in its proper lemma, print it at the end, after the Pacuvius quotation. Our new knowledge of the order in which Nonius' lists contributed both lemnias and extra-quotations, enables us to assign it with certainty a place between the extra-quotation from the ' Accius i ' list and that from the ' Pacuvius ' list. In Book IV p. 393 the extra-quotation from Varro Eum. to the lemma spurcum is taken by Mueller from the place it occupies in the MSS. and put before the quotation from Plautus Asin. This would disturb the proper order, for the lemma belongs to a 'Plautus i' series and the line of Plaut. Asin. is the leading quotation. The same editor brackets two lemmas on p. 414, tegetes, Varr. R.R. I 22 ; taleas, Varr. R.R. I 40, in spite of the fact that they form a quite regular ' Varro iv ' sequence and occupy the place proper to this sequence. At 222. 13 Mueller cannot be right in transposing and bracket- ing the quotation from Cicero (' M. Tullius ') Phil. I, for it holds its proper place as a quotation from the ' Cicero iv ' list. At 419. 10 Mueller deletes a sub-heading (vindicare, revocare) of the lemma vindicare. Its removal would disturb the natural order of the lists and make an extra -quotation from the 'Cicero iii ' list (no. 20) follow extra-quotations from later lists. (Mueller's treatment of 333. 15 J 344. 39-40; 401. 3-5 and many similar passages is open to the same criticism.) At 483. 23 (s.v. quaesti) the MSS. offer : Novius : per deam sanctam Lavernara, quae cultrix f quaestuisit. Mueller ingeniously supposes the name of the play (in the Abl. Case) Paedio to have dropped out before per deam, and argues that 2 The omission of the three concluding lemmas of the ' Lucilius i ' series in Book VIII (p. 489 M.) has similarly divorced bacchanaliorum from holerorum, the former word having apparently come from a marginal note on the latter. 96 Nonius Marcelltis' the omission of any mention of the play is suspicious. But the addition of the titles of Novius' plays is the rule only in the quotations from the ' Novius ' list. This quotation, as we may infer from its position among the extra-quotations (see p. 86), came from a note on the line of Plant. Aul. (the leading quotation), and there is no reason for supposing that the commentator in Nonius' copy of Plautus cited Novius in the same manner. (Similarly in 378. g Varro Prometheo need not be changed to V.P. libera.) Among the lemmas furnished by the 'Alph. Verb.' list, a hst which exhibits strict alphabetical arrangement, in the A-Section of Book II two are spelt in our MSS. affedare and abscondidit. But their position, the first between adaxint and adiugare, the second between albi- catur and atiigat, suggests that at least in the Glossary from which Nonius took them, if not in Nonius' original text, the spelling must have been adfectare and apscojididit. (Similarly commetare p. 89, taetret p. 178.) The lemmas from the same list in the B-Section of Book II are bacchari, blaterare, bount ; but between blaterare and bount editors insert a supposed lemma blandities on the strength of a quotation from Caecilius' ' Hymnis ' which contains the noun blandities but not the verb blatero. A noun however is out of place in a verb-series ; and it seems more likely that the quotation originally exhibited the verb blatero''. In the U-Section the ' Cicero vii ' list (from Cic. ' Orator ' and ' de Oratore,' in this order) has as its first lemma vidtuosum (Cic. Orat, 60), and as its second vermiculatiim with quotation of a line of Lucilius which occurs both in the ' Orator ' (§ 149) and in the third book of the ' de Oratore' (§ 171). Since lemmas from a later part of the 'Orator' and from earlier parts of the 'de Oratore' follow, viz. venalicii, Orat. 232, vocare, de Or. I; vere- cundari, de Or. Ill 36; versutiloquas, de Or. Ill 154, the refer- ence for the Lucilius quotation should properly be 'Cicero in Oratore et (or idem) de Oratore lib. III.' What the MSS. actually shew is ' in Oratore lib. III.' In the scanty G-Section of Book III the MSS. offer as a leading quotation for the lemma gladius a line ' In the American Journal of Philology, vol. XXII, p. 37, I have tried to shew that the lemma- word, when it recurred in a quotation, was often indicated in the archetype by the first letter merely, a practice which has often resulted in the loss of the word from the quotation. Here the words sine blande blatercm may have been written sine blande ble, which was miscopied sine blanditie Dictionary of Republican Latin, 97 of Lucilius, but without indication of the book from which it comes. Since the 'Lucilius i' series shews itself earlier in the section and the lemma gladius is followed by a lemma from the 'Varro ii' list, it would appear to be the 'Lucilius ii' list which has furnished gladius. There is therefore a probability that the quo- tation comes from the last five books of the Satires (so also 165, 9). In the S-Section of Book III (p. 226) the illustrative quotation for suasiones has been lost through homoeoteleuton. It appears to have come from a play of Accius, Pomponius or Novius, for the preceding lemma, squalor, comes from Ace. Eurys. (' Accius i ') and the following, servitus, from Ace. Clyt. ('Accius ii'). In the A-Section of Book IV (235. i) the name of the play of Accius, from which comes a quotation for the lemma aptam, appears in the MSS. in the corrupt form ' Demer.' We have seen that the suggestion of a lemma in this book often came to Nonius from finding in the same list, or in two neighbouring or approximate lists, the same word exhibiting two different senses. On his ' Accius i ' list he found aptus in the sense of adeptus, (Ace. Melan. : obviam ensi it, quern ^.dvorsum aptus alter in promtu 6ccupat), and the other Accius quotation (later in the lemma) with aptus in the sense of conexus et conligatus would seem to have come either from the same list or from the ' Accius ii ' list. Since the number of Accius' plays used for the compilation of these two lists was limited, the possibilities of conjectural emendation of the corrupt ^Demer' are narrowed too. The true title may be Medea, for the Medea comes later in the ' Accius i ' list than the Melanippa. In 552, 15, the Novius paceuo of the MSS. should probably be Novius Paedio. A Pacuvius quotation would be out of place. That the position of Q-lemmas among the C-lemmas is due to Nonius himself is indicated by the correct arrangement, e.g. of the lemma quatere (p. 272) in the C-section of Book IV at the end of a Terence-sequence. The line from which Nonius got the suggestion of the lemma was apparently Ter. Eun. 358 : homo quatietur certe cum done foras, where quatere appeared as the equivalent of excludere. This position of the Q-lemmas does not however imply that Nonius used the spelling cuatere, etc. ; for it may have been a mere matter of convenience, designed to reduce the number of sections in the book. Similarly there is no separate section for K-lemmas. In Book X 'fervitur aeque pro fervetur' with its quotation from Afranius 'Vopiscus' stands H ng Nonius Manellu^ after a Pacuvius sequence: expedibo 'pro expediam,' nolito 'pro noli,' axim, ' egerim,' quite at the proper place for the use of the Afranius list. Mueller should not transpose it to the end of the lemma/ewzV, the opening lemma of the book. His arrange- ment is the more convenient one, no doubt, but it was not the arrangement made by Nonius. Similarly in Book XII the lemma negativae duae has been carelessly repeated by Nonius, who took the first lemma from his 'Varro iii' list (p. 530, with quotation from Varro ' Bimarcus '), and the second from his ' Varro v ' hst (p. 532, with quotation from Varro ' Vita Populi Romani ' II). Nonius' manner of building up his paragraphs by the addition of fresh material in the shape of extra-quotations, as they came to hand from the lists which he took up, one after another, explains to us, when we remember that his compilation was apparently published without revision of any kind, the awkward arrangement of lemmas like concinnare (43 M. 17) from the ' Plautus ii ' list in Book I. From an entry on this list (Plant. Amph. 529) Nonius got the word concinnare with its etymology from cinnus. From the same Hst (Asin. 216) he got the same word, apparently with another etymology, from cano. Later, from the ' Cicero vi ' and 'Cicero viii' lists he got examples oiconcino, and deemed this lemma a suitable place for them, so that the whole reads thus : . Concinnare est facere ; ut Plautus Amphitryone ; ' lacrimantem ex abitu concinnas tu tuam uxorem ' : sed proprietas verbi haec est, quod apud veteres cinnus potionis genus ex multis liquoribus confectum did solet. Recte autem concinnare et consentire intellegi potest, quasi concennare, ut multis diverse canentibus unus efficitur modus. Plautus Asinaria : ' auceps quando concinnavit aream, obfundit cibum.' M. TuUius de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum hb. IV : ' cum is, cum quibus re concinebat, verbis discrepare.' Idem in Academicis lib. I : ' qui cum similitudine verbi concinere maxime sibi videretur.' Paragraphs like these have been a stumbling-block to editors, who have insisted on re-casting them as they would undoubtedly have been re-cast, had Nonius' dictionary been properly revised before publication. But our new knowledge of Nonius' method of work shews us the correctness of the traditional arrangement. Dictionary of Republican Latin. gc) An instructive example is found in the paragraph on cernere (p. 260 M.). At V. 7 of Mueller's page, we have: 'Cernere, amittere,' with a sentence from a Menippean satire of Varro, who quotes the famous line of Ennius Medea : ter sub armis malim vitam cernere quam semel modo parere. At another part of the paragraph we find ' Cernere rursum dimicare vel contendere,' with the same line quoted from Ennius' tragedy, but with vita (Abl.), not vitam (Ace). We need not re-cast the paragraph nor bracket as spurious one or other of the quotations, nor even adapt the second to the first by the change of vita to vitam. We must picture to ourselves Nonius mechani- cally plodding through his lists and selecting from his ' Varro ii ' list the Gerontodidascalus quotation, with its explanation of cernere as amittere, and from his ' Ennius ' list the Medea quotation, as he found it in his copy of Ennius, with its explanation of cernere as dimicare. In the paragraph on tollere (p. 406 M.) editors take offence at the repetition of the sub-heading 'tollere, occidere' (406, 22 and 407, 10). But this repetition of the same sub-heading within a paragraph is of a piece with the repetition of the same lemma within a book. Both are the result of Nonius' dictionary having been published without any attempt at revision. In the paragraph on siccum (p. 395 M.) Mueller's transposition of vv. 4-6 improves the sense, but it runs counter to Nonius' order of sequence. The same editor has not justification for his theory (and frequent practice) in Book IV of transposing the sub-heading that contains the normal sense of the word to the beginning of the paragraph (e.g. occupatus, p. 355 M.; pretium, p. 365 M. ; ducere, p. 282 M.), and in ruling out all paragraphs which contain only one meaning of a word (e.g. agerere, p. 242 M. ; captare, 275 M.; trasmittere 414 M. ; tegetes 414 M. ; taleas 414 M.). The paragraph religio (p. 379 M.) should be left in its traditional arrangement. Nonius took the lemma religio, with the quotation from Varro Anthrop. from the 'Gloss, i' list and added extra- quotations from the 'Lucretius,' 'Virgil,' 'Terence,' 'Lucilius ii' and 'Cicero v' lists, and after all this got a new sub-heading religiosi dies from his 'Gellius' list. (Cf. specula et speculum, p. 434 M.) The paragraph dolitum (p. 99 M.) need not be altered. H 2 loo Nonius Marcellus' These examples of the applcation of our discoveries to the textual criticism of the Compendiosa Dodrina might easily be greatly multiplied ; but I pass to a more interesting subject, namely the information which may be gleaned from Nonius' use of his various sources regarding the state of the text of these authors in Nonius' time, and regarding other points of literary history. vii. Nonius' sources : their nature and the manner in which he used them. The attempt *> to co|;inect Nonius' explanations of words and illustrative quotations with this or that ancient commentary on this or that author has been a failure. Indeed it may be questioned whether Nonius' lemmas in author-sequences imply the use of a copius commentary, such as Servius' commentary on Virgil or Donatus' commentary on Terence. It is the exception, and not the rule, for the leading-quotation to a lemma to be accompanied by a parallel passage taken from a note on the line which furnished the leading-quotation, or for one lemma to be followed hy another lemma which has come from a note on the line containing the first. All that we usually ■= find in the case of author-sequences (as contrasted with glossary or grammarian-sequences) is the ex- planation of the word and a single leading-quotation, namely of the line from which Nonius derived his lemma. The extra- quotations come of course, not from the list which furnished the leading-quotation, but from the other lists successively consulted by Nonius. This suggests rather a form of text such as we find in more than one extant MS. that dates from Nonius' own time, that is to say, a text provided with a number of brief marginal notes. And that Nonius derived his lemmas from actual texts and not from mere commentaries is indicated by his habit of quoting the whole line or sentence in which the word occurs, while it is the practice of ancient commentaries, e.g. of Servius, Donatus, Asconius, to prefix to a note merely two or three words of text. '' By P. Schmidt, 'De Nonii Marcelli auctoribus grammaticis. ' I^eipzig (Teubner), 1868. " The tedious discussion of Virgil's phrase ante diem, ' before the day of her doom' (Aen. IV 697), in Boole XII (p. 526 M.) is an exception. It might pass for a lucubration of Nonius himself, were it not that we have in Servius' com- mentary and in Gellius Noct. Att. XIII, i equally diffuse discussions of the same kind, so that it would seem to have been a theme for grammarians, Dictionary of Republican Latin. loi Further, that Nonius himself read through the texts or at least the marginal annotations of the texts we learn from the curious arrangement of the 'Lucilius ii' list, by which the books of Lucilius' Satires are put under contribution in the reverse order ; first Book XXX, then XXIX, then XXVIII, XXVII, XXVI. This can hardly be anything else than a caprice of Nonius in compiling his list. To suppose however the explanations and parallel passages to be due to Nonius' own researches and not to informa- tion supplied in marginal notes is contrary to the impression which the Compendiosa Doctrina gives us of Nonius' mental attainments. And it is not favoured by the occurrence of two separate Plautus lists, one containing all the 21 plays, the other only Amph., Asin., Aul. The forty-one lists, we may take it, represent the com- pilations from forty-one separate volumes of Nonius' private library or of the library of the town in which he lived. Most of these volumes were texts of authors, but some were glossaries or gram- matical works, such as Aulus Gellius' .' Noctes Atticae.' To distinguish a glossary from a grammatical work by means of the lemmas furnished is not an easy task. Had we not possessed the actual source of list no. 32, viz. the ' Noctes Atticae,' we might have supposed the lemmas which it furnishes to have come from the pages of a glossary. It is possible that nos. 26, 27, 28 ('Gloss, iii,' 'Alph. Verb.,' ' Alph. Adverb.') really represent one source, some large grammatical work'^ of the kind, with one chapter reserved for a treatment of Verbs, another for a treatment of Adverbs. The 'Gloss, v' lemmas shew some striking resem- blances to Festus' epitome of Verrius Flaccus; although what we possess of Festus is a mere fragment, and Paulus Diaconus' epitome of Festus affords only a scanty and distorted representation of the original. In the L-section of Book II of Nonius (p. 13s) tl^e three last lemmas of this series are : L-uculentitatem, a luculento. Caecilius Hymnide : ' vide luculen- titatem eius et magnificentiam.' Laberius Tusca : ' dominus noster tua luculentitate captus.' d How far the occasional references to Nigidius of words from these three lists is significant, I do not know. The viox&facitiir, quoted from a sentence of Nigidius himself, interrupts the alphabetical order of the ' Alph. Verb.' batch of lemmas in Book X (p. 507) = • • • 'ii"''0' Nonius Dapat. ; edim, Caecil. Asot. ; facitur, Nigidius Commentationes Grammaticae, lib. XIX ; evmat, Enn, Hecuba, and so on. 102 Nonius Marcdlus' Lustratus, luxuriogus : a lustris, abditis locis. Plautus Casina : ' unde es, nihili ? ubi lustratu's ? ubi bibisti ? ' Lusciosi, qui ad lucernam non vident et /luourft vocantur a Graecis. Varro Disciplinarum lib. VIII : ' vesperi non videre, quos appel- lant lusciosos.' Idem Andabatis : ' edepol idem caecus, non lus- ciosus est' In Paulus' epitome we have on page 86 of Thewrewk's edition : Luculentus, a luce appellatus. Lustra significant lacunas lutosas, quae sunt in silvis aprorum cubilia. A qua similitudine hi, qui in locis abditis et sordidis ventri et desidi^ operam dant, dicuntur in lustris vitam agere. Et cum eiusdem vocabuli prima syllaba producitur, significat nunc tempus quinquennale, nunc populi lustrationem. Luscitio, vitium oculorum, quod clarius vesperi quam meridie cernit. In Book V of Nonius the same list furnishes these lemmas : Legere et Eligere non sub eadem significatione intellegi vult Varro de Rusticatione lib. I . . . ut sit ' legitur ' colligitur, ut plerumque ; ' eligitur ' melior quaeque de plurimis. Miserari et Misereri veteres his sensibus esse voluerunt, ut sit 'miserari' flere et lamentari ; 'misereri' miserationem alienis casibus exhibere ; et active ad primum effectum, passive ad secun- dum. Accius Eurysace . . . et multi similia, sad aliquando variata generibus. Acerosum et Aceratum, utrumque nove positum, sed distant! proprietate signatum. ' Acerosum ' namque panem farre minus purgato nee sordibus a candido separatis dicendum veteres puta- verunt. Lucilius lib. XV . . . Hunc Graeci avToirvpov vocant. ' Aceratum ' vero est lutum paleis mixtum, ut laterariis usus est. Lucilius lib. IX . . . Here acerosum et aceratum disturbs the usual (rough) alphabetical arrangement of the lemmas taken from the ' Gloss, v ' list. In Paulus' epitome of Festus we have in the L-section (82 Th. 22) : Legimus aut scriptum aut oleam glandemve et alia quaedamj et addita praepositione dicimus ' colligimus,' ' deligimus ' ; and in the M-Section (88 Th. 27) : Miseratur is qui conqueritur ahena incommoda : ' miseretur ' Dictionary of Republican Latin. 103 is qui miserum sublevat. ' Miseret me ' eadem forma dicitur qua piget, paenitet, taedet ; while in the 0-Section we find (209 Th. 11) : Obacerare, obloqui atque alterius sermonem moleste impedire ; quod sumptum videtur a paleis, quas Graeci ax^pa vocant. Itaque et frumentum et panis non sine paleis ' acerosus ' dicitur ; item lutum 'aceratum ' paleis mixtum. On the other hand ' Gloss, iv ' seems to be separated from Festus by the difference in the quotation illustrative of the word sublestus. In the S-Section of Book II Nonius has entered from his ' Gloss, iv ' list this lemma : Sublestum est leve, frivolum. Plautus : ' nam ubi ad pauper- tatem accessit infamia, paupertas gravior fit, fides sublestior.' The corresponding lemma in Festus has been in great part preserved (416 Th. 33) : * * * dicebant infir * * * Plautus in Persa : ' ad paupertatem si immigrant infamiae, Gravior paupertas fit, fides sublestior.' Id est infirmior. Item in Nervolaria vinum ait ' sublestissimum,' quia infirmos faciat vel corpore vel animo. In Paulus' epitome of Festus the lemma is reduced to : Sublesta infirma et tenuia. Plautus : ' gravior paupertas fit, fides sublestior.' Id est infirmior. Idem vinum ait 'sublestissi- mum,' quia infirmos faciat vel corpore vel animo. It is well known that there were two (possibly more) rival ancient editions of Plautus. The quotation in the source of Nonius' ' Gloss, iv ' list follows one edition, with the reading si accessit infamia ; the quotation in Festus takes the other version si immigrant infamiae "- Since Nonius' lemmas from ' glossary ' lists often shew a wealth of quotations that contrasts markedly with the usual single quotation (i.e. leading-quotation) to lemmas in ' author ' sequences, we must suppose the sources from which these 'glossarj*' lists were compiled to have been something different from the typical mediaeval glossary with its scanty treatment of each word, usually without any illustrative quotation. It is indeed a kind fortune which has preserved for us entire the source of one of these lists, Aulus Gellius' ' Noctes Atticae' ; for we thus get a sight of Nonius' » The first version is probably what Plautus actually wrote, the other being a later re-casting of the line to avoid the obsolete scansion accessit. 104 Nonius Marcellus' method of compiling. We see exactly how much (or rather how little) he took from the materials that were in this case available to him^. Occasionally Nonius adds a Virgil quotation to the materials sup- plied by Gellius (e.g. 87, 5). This cannot come from the ' Virgil ' list, for that list was always consulted by Nonius at an earlier stage in his compilation of a book than the ' Gellius ' list. The use of Virgil to illustrate the commoner meanings of words in Book IV has already (p. 37) suggested to us the possibility that many Virgil- quotations in the ' Compendiosa Doctrina ' come from Nonius him- self. The Virgilian lemmas and quotations in the ' Gloss, v ' series may therefore not belong to the actual glossary used by Nonius. Other quotations which one would be inclined to regard as Nonius' own contributions are those from late authors like Serenus, GadulUus Gallicanus, Apuleius. Since ' Gloss, v ' comes at the end of Nonius' lists, it is easy to assign to it with certainty its own extra-quotations b, whereas in the case of other ' glossary ' sources there is often considerable dif- ficulty in deciding whether an extra-quotation has come from the list which furnishes the lemma and leading quotation or from a list consulted later by Nonius. Often we get a clue from an exami- nation of the citations of authors in the different ' glossaries ''.' ' That Nonius actually borrowed from Gellius is, I take it, put beyond question by the foregoing exposition of Nonius' method in constructing the Compendiosa Doctrina. If a lemma taken from the Gellius-Iist occasionally shews extra-quotations, which are not found in Gellius, that is of course the result of Nonius having met with the same word in some other list which he consulted later. In some cases the text of Nonius enables us to restore the true text of Gellius, e.g. at the lacuna in the Gellius MSS. in Noct. Att. V. 4. If we were to put together all the notes which Nonius seems to have taken from his copy of this or that author (e.g. Plautus), so as to get a picture of the complete commentary in the edition he used of the author, the picture would probably be wholly inadequate. Prof. Hertz has put together Nonius' borrow- ings from the ' Noctes Atticae.' But they give us no real idea of what the work of Gellius was like. B So that Nonius' remark s.v. conticinium (p. 62 M. 21), a word furnished by this list in Book I : auctores multi sunt mihi, sed auctoritate deficiunt, must- refer to the quotations supplied by this glossary. '^ Thus it is the Epic of Ennius, not his dramas, which is drawn upon by ' Gloss, v ', and the number of the book is as often omitted as not. In citations from CaeciUus by 'Gloss, v' the name of the play is often not mentioned. Laberius furnishes a large number of quotations in this glossary. The quotations from Catullus seem to be peculiar to it. Dictionary of Republican Latin. 105 Of all the ' glossary ' sources the most doubtful is ' Gloss, ii.' Even its existence is doubtful ; for it is most in evidence in Book I, and the lemma-series there assigned to it {valgus, vatrax, vaiax, silo, broncus, compernis, varus) may be in reality a collection made from all his lists by Nonius himself. Possibly he had the intention of making a separate book on 'Adjectives denoting physical pecu- liarities,' but changed his mind on finding their number insufificient for his purpose ' ; although, so far as that goes, Book XX has equally slender material. And the source of Book XX is equally obscure, for in this book, and in no other, illustrative quotations are wholly lacking. There is only a vague reference to Afranius and the early Jurists : de quibus exempla multa sunt in antiquis auctoribus, et maxime in Afranio et iuris vetustissimis scriptoribus. But Prof. Lucian Mueller has ingeniously argued that this list of words of relationship must come from some writer of the Augustan Age, since it begins with the two words caesares,zxi6. agrippae. Nonius may have taken his materials for the book from one of his ' Glossary ' lists, e.g. ' Gloss. V.' On the other hand, ' Gloss, i ' stands out very clearly. It is almost as definitely a Titinius-glossary as ' Gloss, iv ' is a Varro- glossary, although Varro is largely quoted in ' Gloss, i ' also. And since no alphabetical arrangement is recognizable, it may well be The close connexion of ' Gloss, iii ', ' Alph. Verb.' and ' Alph. Adverb. ' is seen in the similarity of their citations. Both the dramas and the Epic of Ennius are cited, the latter with statement of the number of the book, e.g. 'Ennius Annal. IX.' Caecilius is widely used (especially the Hyp. Rastr., Fall., Asot.), the name of the play being always mentioned. Laberius is less, and Livius Andronicus more used than in ' Gloss, v.' While ' Gloss, v ' draws only from the plays of Naevius, there three cognate sources cite both his plays and his ' Bellum Poenicum ' (with mention of the number of the book). They use freely both Pomponius and Novius, of which authors there is scarcely a mention in ' Gloss, v. ' The quotations from Sueius ' PuUi ' seem to be peculiar to them. ' Hamiotae, which may be the first lemma of this sequence, occurs in Plaut. Rud. 310 ; and in the following lines of this play there is a string of Adjectives (including silanus) descriptive of personal appearance. Does the sequence really originate from the ' Plautus i ' list ? We must not fail to notice that the Lucilius citations follow Nonius' own distinction (see pp. 8-9), e.g. 'Lucil. Sat, lib. II ' : but ' Lucil. lib. XXVIII ' ; whereas in Lucilius' citations from some other sources, such as ' Gloss, iii ', the title ' Satyrae ' is omitted in the case of the earlier, as of the later, books. These sources quote also Books XXI — XXV. xo6 Noniits Marcel Ins' that the order in which the Titinius-quotations come coincides with their actual order of occurrence in the text of the dramatist ''. The plays cited are the Veliterna, Prilia, Psaltria, Gemina, Setina, Quintus, Varus, Fullones and Barbatus, and they seem to come in something like this order. There is therefore some possibility that in the Gemina, frag, xiv (ap. Non. 510. 4) in the small Teubner text of the fragments should precede frag, ix (Non. 510. 12); in the Quintus, frag, iii (ap. Non. 277. 17) should precede frag, v (ap. Non. 277. 29); and again in the Gemina, frag, xv (ap. Non. 406. i) should precede frag, v (ap. Non. 406. 19), and frag, iii (ap. Non. 157. 15) should precede frag, iv (ap. Non. 157. 18). Titinius is seldom cited in the other 'glossaries.' They all quote freely from Plautus, not only the 'Varronian' plays, but also (except ' Gloss, i ') the others too, e.g. the Cornicula, Astraba, Nervolaria. It is extremely interesting to find that the text quoted in a ' glos- sary '-sequence occasionally represents a different edition from the text quoted in the ' Plautus-sequences.' Thus Epid. 188 is quoted from the 'Gloss, iii' hst in Book VII. (p. 479) with exugebo san- gvinem, but from the 'Plautus i' list in Book II (p. 102) with exorbebo sanguinem ; Cist. 382 (in the small Teubner edition) in Book I (p. 64) occurs in the ' Gloss, v ' series with mustulentus aestus, but in Book IV (p. 415) in the 'Plautus i' series with musttileiitus ventus '. We see occasionally a marked difference in the citation of other authors too, when taken by Nonius from different sources. Cic. Rep. III. 40 (Teubn.) appears very differently as quoted from Nonius' copy of Cicero in Book XII (p. 522) and as quoted from a note on a passage of Sisenna in Book II (p. 68), the reason of the difference, no doubt, being that the commentator had quoted inexactly from memory ■". An editor of Nonius must ^ Author-sequences are, as was mentioned before (p. 4), a common feature of Latin glossaries. An example from the glossaries used by Nonius is found on p. 267 M. ('Alph. Verb.') Afranius Simulans, Afran. Matertera, Afran. In- cendium ; cf. p. 78 ('Alph. Verb.') s.v. blaterare ; p. 392 ('Gloss, i') s.v. coicere ; p. 517 ('Gloss, i') s.v. derepente ; p. 124 ('Gloss, i') s.vv. insolum, inibi. We must be on our guard against confusing these cases where an author is quoted from a ' Glossary ' list with the cases where an author is quoted from the list compiled by Nonius himself from his own copy of the author. 1 The monographs of Reblin (' de Non. Marcelli locis Plautinis ') and Caesar ('de Plauti memoria apud Nonium servata.' Strassburg, 1886) require to be re-written from this new point of view, for they do not distinguish between Plautus-quotations from the ' Plautus i ', ' Plautus ii ' and the other lists. ™ Notice that the so-styled fragment of the 'Captivi' of Plautus, to which Dictionary oj Republican Latin. 107 therefore be on his guard against assimilating one quotation to another of the same passage, if the two quotations come from different sources" (e.g. 279. 27 and 38. 25, a Lucilius passage); and editors of the author quoted by Nonius must give greater weight to quotations taken by Nonius from his own reading than to those taken from .commentaries on authors. We see from Servius' notes on Virgil how careless commentators can be in the matter of quotations. In the ' Compendiosa Doctrina ' a line of Virgil (G. Ill 143) is cited incorrectly from a note in Nonius' copy of Varro Vit. Pop. Rom. (531 M. 22), but correctly elsewhere (at 387, 6 and 389, 25). The passage from the Hermiona of Pacuvius (393 M. 2), which editors have laboured to restore to metrical form, does not come from the Pacuvius' list. The quotation from Plant. Amph. 775 at 261 M. 32, comes not from Nonius' copies of Plautus, but from a note in his copy of Lucilius I— XX. It should be left in editions of Nonius in its traditional form (cf. 24. 19; 308. 12). So should the quotation from Cic. de Div. II, 5 at 265 M. 29, which comes from a note in Nonius' copy of Cicero Off. I. The citations from Varro's Menippean Satire Evpti/, etc., are too few to shew whether wepi KaerjKovTtov (399 M. 24) is an admissible variation of the title. It is possible that the quotation comes from a note in Nonius' copy of Turpilius. The quotation of a line of Afranius at 483 M. 30 comes from the ' Afranius ' hst, and has greater claim to accuracy than the quotation of the same line at 529 M. 6 (from a note in Nonius' smaller copy of Plautus). The volume which Nonius used, containing the twenty -one 'Varronian' plays of Plautus, exhibited a text which often dis- agrees with the 'Ambrosian' and the 'Palatine' texts. (So the two recensions of Plautus are styled, which have been transmitted to us in our MSS.) That is only to be expected, since the order of the plays in, that volume was different from the ' Ambrosian ' and the 'Palatine' order. Here is a scheme of the three ar- rangements : editors find difficulty in assigning any place in the known text of the play (220 M. II, s.v. filleus), does not come from Nonius' ' Plautus i ' list. Nor do the mis- quotations of Men. 94 (108 M. 21), Cas. 245 (13S, 7), Men. 195 (138, 20). ° Another point to remember with regard to repetitions of the same pas- sage, is that where the repetition is the work of some mediaeval student (see ahove, p. 6), the ' consensus ' of reading goes for very little. loS Nonius Manellus' Ambrosian ' recension. ' Palatine ' recension. Recension used by Nonius. Amph. — Asin. — Aul. Amph. Amph. Asin. Asin. Aul. Aul. Bacch. ? Bacch. Bacch. Capt. Capt. Cist. Cure. Cure. Cas. Cas. Cas. Capt. Cist. Cist. Cure. Epid. Epid. Epid. Merc. Most. " Most. Men, Mil. ^ Mil. Mil. Men." :Mere. — Most Men. Merc. Poen. Pseud. Pers. Pers. Poen. Pseud. Pseud. Pers. Poen. ■Rud. Rud. Rud. Stich, Stich. Stich. ? Trin. Trin. Trin. ? True. True. True. PVidul. Vidul. The position of the Vidularia in the recension used by Nonius is not quite certain, but the balance of probability inclines to a place after the Baeehides. Sinee the arrangement is alphabetical, the title of the play would seem in that case to have been spelt Bidularia. Still less certain is the priority of the Cistellaria to the Casina. Since the arrangement in Nonius' copies of the text of Plautus and of the other authors used by him is of interest, and may throw light on their literary history, it will be best to give in detail in an Appendix the evidence which Nonius' citations supply on this head. Here it only remains to enquire what light our new knowledge of Nonius' method of compilation throws upon the titles and editions of the Republican writings from which he quotes. One has merely to turn over the pages of books like TeufFel's ' Roman Literature ' or Ribbeck's ' Poetry of the Republic ' to discover how greatly we are dependent upon Nonius for the literary history of Repub- Dictionary of Republican Latin. 109 lican Rome. In many cases it is a single citation in this dictionary which has preserved for us the knowledge of a lost work. We have already seen that Nonius adheres mechanically to one system of citing the authors whom he read for himself (e.g. 'Lucilius Satyrarum lib. II' but 'Lucilius lib. XXVIII'; 'Cicero de Oratore ' but ' M. Tullius de Finibus'), and that a peculiar- ity in the form of citation often enables us to pronounce that Nonius is here drawing from a ' Glossary ' list and not from an ' author ' list ; further, that the different ' Glossary ' lists occasionally provide criteria of the same kind. That ancient books were, like modern, liable to changes of titles is an acknowledged fact. The best-known examples are some plays of Plautus which at the Plautine revival in the last century of the Republic were re-christened by stage-managers, the ' Mostel- laria,' becoming the ' Phasma ' and so on. A striking example of ' one form with many names ' is that work of Varro's which is cited only five times by Nonius, but under four (perhaps really three) different appellations, viz. (i) Varro [pro] Gallo vel Fundanio de admirandis reius {"]!, 21 ; from the 'Gloss, i ' list), (2) Varro Gallo vel ° Fundanio de miris (217, i ; from the same list) ; (3) Varro Gallo aut Fundanio {-ia MSS.) (205, 33); (4) Varro in Admirandis (218, 16 and 220, 9 ; from a note in Varro's copy of Plautus and from ' Gloss, iii-v ' respectively). Another example is that play of Accius which in quotations taken from the ' Accius ii ' list is always cited as Aeneadae aut Decius (cf. Stasiastae vel Tropaeum Libert, another play of Accius), but in quotations from the ' Alph. Verb.' ' Alph. Adverb' lists, etc., merely as Aeneadae'^. Editors assign to a play of Titinius the title Psaltria sive Ferentinatis, because the same line is referred to the Psaltria by Nonius (331, 26) and to the Feren- tinaiis by Priscian. Similarly the line quoted by Nonius (421, 19) from the Omen of Afranius is by Servius (ad Aen. IV 194) referred to the Cinerarius ^. " The word vel is confirmed by the valuable corrections (F') in the Lauren - tian MS. P Therefore 123, 11-12 should not be bracketed as a scribe's anticipation, (through 'skipping' a leaf) of 126, 16-17. * These differences of title often throw a light on the form and succession of editions of an author's works. I add two examples from other authors cited by Nonius. A passage of Serenus is referred at 431, 16 to the Opuscula, but at 212, 25 to the Ruralia. A passage of Cicero is cited at 239, i from M. Tullius fro Marco Marcello (from the ' Cicero i' list apparently), but at 437, 9 no Nonius Marcdlus' Editors of these lost Republican authors have made hypothetical identifications of various titles, of the Fenerator and the Obolostates of Caecilius, for example ; but hypothesis has seldom passed into certainty. Our analysis of the ' Compendiosa Doctrina ' gives us a sure test in many cases. Where Nonius cites, let us say, Accius, from one of his ' Accius ' lists and employs different titles, these cannot be titles of the same play. The monographs on Accius, Pacuviiis, Afranius and all these authors require to be re-written from this new point of view. To discuss all these literary questions would require more space than is at my disposal. I content myself with mentioning a few considerations that should guide our investigations. Nonius' mechanical, undeviating regularity in the citation of the authors whose works he himself consulted is an undoubted fact, but it must not be unduly pressed. Prof Mueller has argued that Nonius must have used two copies of Cicero's speeches (as he used two copies of Plautus, one containing only the first three plays), because in certain cases this uniformity is not observed, notably in his citations from the fourth and fifth Verrines. Since these belong mainly to Book, IV, where there is often great diffi- culty in assigning the ' extra-quotations ' to their actual sources, it is difficult to obtain clear assurance. But it seems as though Nonius' unusual variety in this particular Cicero-citation were due to the unwieldy title which he found in his edition. His first use of the fourth speech is in Book I, where the ' Cicero iv ' list comes into play, at 34 M. 10 ; and there he gives the long title, M. Tullius Verrinarum lib V de Signis. But his very next citation from the same list (at 34 M. 14) appears as M. Tullius de Signis, an alteration that is surely due to desire of brevity. The title in his edition was, I fancy, M. Tullius Verrinarum (or in Verrein) lib V de Signis ; and in Book IV, where are found nearly all of the quotations, the shortened title is employed in all which can be definitely referred to the 'Cicero iv' list. The fifth speech is not cited in Book I ; but in Book IV, when cited from the ' Cicero iv ' list, it appears variously as M. Tullius de Suppliciis and M. Tullis in Verrem de Suppliciis. It is perhaps safer to regard this isolated instance of want of uniformity as an ' exception that from M. Tullius in Caesarianis . This citation comes either from the ' Lucilius ii' list or from a note on Virg. Aen. VI 173. Servius in his note on Aen. V 1S7 cites the same passage from Cicero in Caesarianis. Dictionary of Republican Latin. Ill proves the rule.' Similarly Miles and not Miles Gloriosus is the normal form of citation from the ' Plautus i ' list ; but it would be difficult to rule out every case of the fuller citation (e.g. 103, 4 ; 120, 24; 146, II ; 230, 8). Nonius has two reference-formulas to letters of Cicero (now lost), M. Tiill. ad Caes.jun. and M. Tull. Epist. ad Caes. The question has recently been raised whether two publications are referred to or only one''- Can we solve it by the new means at our disposal? The facts seem to be these. The formula M. Tull. ad Caes. jun., with the addition of the number of the book, seems well-established for the ' Cicero iv ' series. The citations M. Tull. {Epist.) ad Caes., with or without the word Epist. and with or without a book-number, appear, when they can be located with any confidence, in the middle of the Terence-sequence (e.g. 32, 15 ; 270, 22 ; 287, 26), the sequence immediately preceding 'Cicero iv.' All this means either that the 'Terence' list of Nonius was in- terrupted (like the ' Accius ' lists) by a list from ' M. Tull. Epist. ad Caes.' (which would in that case be probably a different work from ' M. Tull. ad Caes. jun.') or that the author of the marginal notes in Nonius' copy of Terence quoted frequently from this book. The latter explanation seems the more likely, but further light is required. Similarly Nonius' use of quotations from the Gymnasticus of Naevius, between the ' Plautus i ' and ' Lucretius ' lists, is not quite sufficient to convince us that he actually excerpted this play. It has been frequently remarked that several titles of books quoted by Nonius were written in abbreviated form in some early archetype or even in the first edition of the dictionary, and that these contractions have often been wrongly expanded by scribes. Varro de Re Rustica sometimes appeared as Varro de Re R'., of which scribes have made de Re Populi Roniani, or as Varro de Re Ru., which has become de Rerum Natura or de Repuhlica. At 70 M. 16 the title Cicero de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum has in our MSS. the addition et Marcus, which seems to be a scribe's first attempt to expand the contraction Md for Malorum (cf 35. M. 5). Numerous instances might be added. Our best MSS. (Z. and Gen.) shew in book IV the actual contraction used in the archetype for de suppliciis, viz. de supl. What then is "■ By Gurlitt, ' Nonius Marcellus und die Cicero-Briefe ', Steglitz 1888, and by Luc. Mueller, ad Non. 528 M. 26. 112 Nonius Marcellus'. Dictionary of Republican Latin. more natural than that the slight variation in the title of a play of Titinius, as cited by Nonius (in the Ablative case), Fullonia and Fullonibus, should be ascribed to a mere error in transcribing a contraction'. And yet, if we examine the occasions on which the play is cited, we find a regularity that cannot be accidental. The citations with Fullonia come from the ' Alph. Verb.' list (in, lo; 153, 25; 245, 36; 470, 2); those with Fullonibus come all, or nearly all, from the 'Gloss, i' list'. Clearly it will not do to allow the possibility of scribal errors to make us too regardless of even minute differences in the form of citations. On the rare occasions when Varro's work on Husbandry is cited outside of the ' Varro iv' sequence, it appears as Rusticae Res or Res Rusticae. It is doubtful therefore whether Mueller is right in changing Varro de Rusticatione lib. /(444 M. 23) into Varro de Re Rustica lib. I. Some other questions regarding the titles of books are discussed in the Appendix. ' See Havet 'M^l. Graux' p. 811 «., who argues that the true form is Fullonia. ' In 470, 2, fullonia specta was the reading of the archetype, as is proved by the consensus of L. and the Extract MSS. APPENDIX. The arrangement of authors' 7vorks in the editions tised by Nonius "■. Plautus i. Amphitruo (III A, III S, IV S, VI, etc.). Asinaria, after Amph. (Ill S, III T, IV S). Aulularia, after Asin. (I, IV S, VII Pass., VIII). Bacchides, after Aul. (I, VII Pass.). Cistellaria, after Bacch. (II E. Cf II R, II A). Casina, after Cist. (? I), after Bacch. (? IV L, VII Pass.). Captivi, after Cas. (I, IV L, VIII), after Cist. (II A ; 482. 3). Curculio, after Capt. (I. Cf. 421. 16 ; II H, III P). Epidicus, after Cure. (I; 8. 15. Cf. II E, VIII). Miles Gloriosus, after Epid. (II E, VI, XVII). Menaechmi, after Mil. glor. (IV M, VII Act.). Mercator (II G, III A, etc.), after Capt. (Ill A. Cf 233. 9). Mostellaria (?IV R, ? 81. 17). Persa, after Men. (VII Act. Cf. I). (In 342, 28 the word Miiite seems to be corrupt). Pseudolus, after Pers. (I. Cf V). Poenulus, after Pseud. (I, V. Cf. XI; 258. 15). Rudens, after Poen. (XI, XIII). Stichus, after Rud. (IV E, XIII). Trinummus, after Stich (III A. Cf. I, XI). Truculentus, after Trin. (I. Cf. VI, VII Pass.). Vidularia, stands between Bacch. and Cas. (VII Pass,). (The citation at 123. 34 seems to come from ' Gloss i '.) Accius i. Eurysaces " (I ; 495. 19; 517- 25). Erisaces''(IIS). ^ A 'leading-quotation' is indicated by reference to the book, or section of the book, in which it occurs ; an ' extra-quotation,' by reference to the page and line. A reference which immediately follows the title of the work indicates a quotation which proves that the work belongs to the series in question. i> Whether the difference of spelling in the MSS. is sufficient evidence of I 114 Nonius Marcellus' Dictionary of Republican Latin. Armorum Judicium (II N), after Eris. (II S). Astyanax (II M, V ; 518. 13), after Arm. iud. (VIII. Cf. IV O). Oenomaus (I, III F), after Arm. iud. (II H. Cf. I, III U, IV 0). Tereus (519. 5), after Astyan. (V. Cf. ? II D, II S). Alphesiboea (IV D. But cf. VII Act.), after Tereus (279. 35), after Oenom. (? 73. 27). (Ct. 136. 16; 485. 26). Amphitryo (II O), after Oenom. (469. 5. But cf. 292. 13). Melanippus (I; 233. 22; ?499, 17. But cf. Ill P), after Oenom. (I. Cf.48s. 31; 521- 7)- Epinausimache (233. 24; 495. 21), after Melan. (233. 24 Cf 519. 8; 485. 16; 495. 21). Pelopidae, after Melan. (485. 33. Cf. II S). Phoenissae (I), after Melan. (I. Cf. V; 174. 2). Medea (I, IV I), after Phoen. (I), after Epinaus. (IV F). (Cf. 467- 37)- Philocteta (I), after Medea (I, 323. 16. Cf. VII Act, \ 512. 16). Alcmeo, after Philoct. (VII Act. Cf. ?II G, VIII). Telephus, after Alcm. (VIII. Cf. IV F, V; 13. 17; 174. 14; 227. 29). ?? Paris (??2o6. 15). Accius ii. Epigoni-^ (III C; 342. 15), after Teleph. (V. Cf. 16. 4; II P; 192- S)- Meleager (IV L. But cf. 503. 7), after Teleph. (IV F. Cf. VII Act.). Aeneadae aut Decius (III C, 484. 6), after Epig. (II U, III C). a difference of plays is matter of opinion. The two are apparently discriminated by Nonius iiimself in a lemma from the ' Gloss, v ' series in Book V (p. 445 M.) : Miserari et misereri . . . Accius Eurysace : ' ei mihi, ut etiam haec aerumna mihi luctum addit luctibus ! ', alia persona : ' quid miserare ? ', idem Erysace (id me erysacem MSS.): ' tuam solitatem memoras, formidas tibi. Te con- miserabar magis quam miserebar mei.' (Compare however 316. 5-7 : Novius Paedio . . . idem, where some MSS. have 'idem Paedio '. Also 394. 21; 526. 9). = The similarity of Efigoni and Erigona has caused mistakes in the MSS. ; e.g. 'Cae.\t\axa& clepere in the 'Accius ii' series, in Book I (20 M. 9) has a leading- quotation from a play which the MSS. give as Epigone. Quicherat reads Erigone (Abl,), Mercier Epigonis (Abl.). Unfortunately the exact position of the Erigona is not certain, though it was probably a good deal lower on the 'Accius ii' list than the Epigoni. In 20. 9, where the play cited heads the list, we should read Epigonis (Abl.), but in 398. 20, where only one play of the list is cited (Efigono, -na MSS.), there is nothing to guide our selection. Appendix. 115 Stasiastae vel Tropaeum Liberi (I), after Meleag. (IV L), after Epig. (v.l. Erig.) (I). Athamas (IV I, VIII), after Meleag. (VII Act.). Clytaemestra, after Meleag. (125. 3. Cf. 488. 12). Bacchae (II N, VIII), after Atham. (VIII. Cf. II M). Neoptolemus (IV D, IX. But cf. VII Act.), after Aen. aut Dec. (? 258. 6). Erigona (II P ; 498. 5. But cf. Ill S), after Neopt. (? 469- 21), after Epig. (? IIP). Nyctegresia (336. 31 ; 484. 8), after Atham. (500. 6. Cf. 336. 31), after Aen. vel Dec. (484. 8). Andromeda (I, ? II F), after Neopt. (424. 3), after Stas. vel Trop. (I). Phinidae (I, III C, VIII), after Androm. (I. Cf. Ill C ; 504. 32), after Bacch. (VIII). Atreus (281. 5), after Neopt. (281. 5 ; 505. 8). Agamemnonidae (II O). ??Diomedes, after Atham. (? VII Act.). Accius i-ii. Antigona (IV O ; 352. 19), after Oenom. (IV O; 352. 19). PChrysippus (?IV C). ?? Deiphobus (? XIII). Pomponius*'. Pictores (I, ? IV D, IV I). Prostibulum (I, II O), after Pictores (I). Pannuceati (I, II N), after Prostib. (I). Pappus agricola (VII Pass. ; 498. 5 ; 517. 28). Pistor (81. 22 j 517. 30), after Papp. agr. (517. 30), after Prostib. (146. 25). Praeco posterior (I ; 342. 14; IX, etc.), after Pannuc. (I). Piscatores (VIII ; 484. 4). PPetitor (?III F). (Cited in the 'Gloss, iii' sequence in VII Act. as Cretula vel Petitory ^ That the Pompqnius-list preceded the Novius-list in Nonius' order of con- sultation seems probable (see Bk. VIII and 81. 22 sqq.), but is not free from doubt (see 342. 11 sqq., where however the best MS. {Gen.) has vv. 11 (Gallin.) —14 (Pomp.) in the margin, perhaps exactly reproducing the archetype and pointing to a transposition of the two quotations). In 518. 17 sqq. the quotation from Pomp. Praec. post, appears to come from the ' Alph. Adverb.' list. 1 16 Nonius Marcellus' Dictionary of Republican Latin. PPorcus (?III U). (Cited in the 'Alph. Adverb.' sequence in I as Forcaria,') Novius ''■ ? Decuma (II F). FuUones feriati (8i. 24; 233. 26). ? Gallinaria (4. 3 ; ? 342. 11). Paedium (XIV; 316. 5, 7 ; 539- 21 ; ?S4o. n)- ?? Tabellaria (? Ill P). ? Ficitor (II F), after Dec. (II F). Agricola (IX), after Full. far. (81. 26). PMaccus (III C; ?Si8. 17). ? Maccus exul. (? IV L, 4. 5 ; 210. 26), after Gall. (4. 5). ? Milites Pometinenses (? 212. 29). ? Pappus praeteritus (? 4. 25). ?? Sanniones (? Ill P), after Tabell. (Ill P). Zona (VIII J 481. 18). ? Praeco posterior (210. 29), after Mace. ex. (210. 29). In 495. 24 'Eurysace', the reading of the MSS., is thought^ to have been substituted for the title of some other play of Novius. The quotation belongs to this series. Ennius. Hectoris lytra (VIII; 355. 16; 467. 39; 504. 35. etc.). Telephus (V, VIII, 15. 8; 342. 18), after Hect. lytr. (VIII). ??Andromacha aechmalot. (? 503. 12). (The contraction Aechmalo. is found in two citations, perhaps both from the ' Alph. Adverb.' list, 402. 3 and 515. 12. Aechmalotus is apparently the form used in 292. 7, Aechmalotis in 505. 12). ?? Andromacha (? 504. 17). ?? Ambracia (? 469. 28). ?? Medea (??467. 13). Turpilius. Boethuntes (I, V; 342. i, etc.). Demetrius (15. 8; 216. 7; 352. 21; 424. 5; PVIII). PCanephorus (? VIII), after Demetr. (PVIII). ^ The number of Novius' play.s is large and the quotations from them few, so that there is seldom unimpeachable evidence that this or that play belonged to the volume used by Nonius. ' There is however a ' Phoenissae ' of Novius, so why may there not have been a ' Eurysaces ' ? Appendix. 1 1 7 Demiurgus (IV A, III S; 8. 19, etc.), after Caneph. (?VIII). Epiclerus (VII Pass., IX ; 84. 21, etc.). Thrasyleo (VII Pass.), after Epicl. (215. 29 ; VII Pass.). Paedium (VII Act.; 489. 30; 497. 16; 306. 36), after Epicl. (497- 16). Philopator (IV D, II L ; 358. 6 ; 484. 26), after Thras. (321. 12), after Boeth. (429. 19). Leucadia (IV C, XIII; 21. 27; 496. 22), after Paed. (XII. Cf. 321. 23; 322. 22), after Demetr. (408. 34; 322. 23). Lindia (II U, 343. 16, etc.), after Demetr. (352. 23 ; 397, 39). Lemniae (14. 23 ; 256. 25 ; ?IV P), after Leuc. (534. 6). Paraterusa (II U, IV O, etc.), after Lind. (II U), after Philop. . (II L). Hetaera (IV C, VII Act., XVII ; 539. 25), after Parater. (186. lo. Cf. IV C, VII Act.; 468. 18; 526. 2), after Leuc. (262. 13. Cf. 47°- 37). after Demiurg. (483. 31). The order of the plays suggests an original alphabetical arrange- ment, according to the Greek alphabet, which has been to some extent abandoned. Pacuvius. Atalanta (II P, 355. 29 ; 429. 7 ; 495. 29). Periboea (I, II M, etc.), after Atal. (495. 31). Dulorestes (I, II M, etc.), after Perib. (I, II M. Cf II P, 490. 15). Hermiona (II D, 234. 24), after Perib. (237. 5). Plliona (?IV O), after Atal. (?IV R). PPNiptra (? 77. 19). ?? Medus (? II A), after Niptra (? 77. 19). PPChryses (?467. 13; P469. 10). PP Armorum Judicium (? 261. 23). PP Antiopa, after Herm, (P 73. 14). Varro i. Eu/jei/ 17 Xoiray to jrm/ia, Trepi y^yajjLtjKoToiv (VII PaSS., 399. 34). 'E^o) (7f, irepi Tvxvs (343- I- But cf II T). Uipl i^aytoyijs, (IV M, IV S, VI ; 352. 26). Mutuum muU scabunt, wepl ■^aipi.a-ixov (III T; 235. 9). 'Av^pfflTroTToXif, Trepi yeve6\iaK^s (III S, VII Act.; 504. 12). (In 551. 7, where this piece is cited from the ' Gloss, v' list, its title Anik. is given in Latin characters and the alternative title is wanting.) ii8 Nonim Marcellus' Dictionary of Repuhlican Latin, Marcopolis, wepi ap^s (234. 4). Cygnus, TTfpi To^^s (497. 25). Sciamachia, n-epl tuc^ou (io. 15 ; 131. 22 ; III C). Synephebus, mpi e/z/noi/^f (III S, IV I). To eVl Ty aKlj /lupov, Trepl evKaipias (2 ID. 9). 'AXX' ou fiEi/fi trc, jTCpi i\apyvpias (XIX. But CI. II T). Papia papae, jrepl iyK6i (I. Cf. II C, VI, VII Pass.). Varro iii. Bimarcus (I, II A, II D, etc.). Manius (II F, II L, II P, etc.), after Bimarc. (VI). 120 Nonius Marcellus" Dictionary of Republican Latin. Modius (I, II A, II G, etc.), after Man. (VI. Cf. I, II A, etc. But cf. II T). -Ocof Xvpas (I, n D, II M, etc. But cf 49- 32), after Mod. (I, II M, IIS). Afranius. Vopiscus (I, II O, V, VIII, etc.). Privignus (I, II I, V), after Vop. (I, V, VIII). Fratriae (I, II A, V, etc.), after Priv. (I, V. Cf II O; 280. 31 ; 497- 32)- Exceptus (II M, II P, ? XII, ? XIII, ? XIV), after Fratr. (? XIV). ? Divortium (?XI), after Fratr. (?394. i). PSuspecta (? II E; ?5o4. 16). PEpistola (?III G, Fill R; ?S4o. 13). PPInimici (P477. 28). Terence. Andria (IV S, VIII). Adelphi (VIII, II D, IV C), after Andr. (VIII. But cf IV C). Phormio (II E, II G, IV C), after Adelph. (? IV C). Hecyra (I, IV C), after Phorm. (I). Heautontimorumenos (II ,S, IV D), after Phorm. (IV D). Eunuchus (I, II R, etc.), after Hec. (I), after Heaut. (IV E) (cf. II R), after Adelph. (VIII ; 190. 12). Is this an alphabetical arrangement with the spelling Formio i IPtinteft bi8 Jamea Iparfter anb Co., Crown Kav6, ®j{or6.