Cornell University Library Z 7164.L1U693 Select list of references on boycotts an 1 III III ill II II il li I II 111 II III III h ill 3 1924 002 386 088 N. Y. S. SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS THE LIBRARY OF THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY The original of tiiis book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/cletails/cu31924002386088 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS SELECT LIST OF REFERENCES ON BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS IN LABOR DISPUTES COMPILED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP HERMANN HENRY BERNARD MEYER CHIEF BIBLIOGBAFHEB WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFBICE For Bale by the 1911 Superintendent of Documento Price lOC OoTemment Frintlns OfSoe LIBRARY OF CONGRESS SELECT LIST OF REFERENCES ON BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS IN LABOR DISPUTES COMPILED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP HERMANN HENRY BERNARD MEYER CHIEF BIBLIOGRAPHER WASHINGTON GOVEENMENT PRINTING OPFIOE 1911 L. 0. card, ] 0-35010 PREFATORY NOTE The list here presented was originally intended to indicate litera- ture on the use and abuse of injunctions in labor disputes, but the subject was found to be so interwoven with the boycott that the scope of the list was extended to include that question also. The injunction proved to be so powerful a weapon in labor dis- putes and its abuse under certain circumstances so easy, that, almost from the start, it aroused the greatest interest and has been widely discussed in popular magazines, and the publications of labor organ- izations. These two classes of pubhcations consequently have furnished a large part of the references; and special pains have been taken to present, as completely as possible, those writings in which labor leaders have expressed their attitude toward the question. The other main source of information has proved to be the legal literature of the past twenty years; this has been freely drawn upon, though without citation of particular cases. To have included such would have been to duplicate work already well done in the "American digest." Those, therefore, who desire references to particular cases should consult that work, which extends down to 1896, and its sup- plements the "Decennial edition of the American digest," 1897-1906, and the "American digest annotated" which extends from 1906 to 1910. Complete bibliographical descriptions of these works with special page references are given on page 4 of this list. Certain cases have aroused so much interest that they have been widely discussed outside of the legal profession. Keferences to these discussions have been included and they will be found brought together under appropriate headings in the index at the end of the list. Two new features have been introduced into this list which will prove of special interest to librarians. When printed catalogue cards exist for any work entered in the list, the Library of Congress card number is printed immediately after the entry at the left. On the same line to the right the class mark, where determined in the new classification, is printed in heavier type. H. H. B. Meyek Chief Bibliographer Heebekt Putnam Librarian of Congress Washington, D. C, March 23, 1911 in PROPERTY OF LIBRARY NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL mm RELATIONS *"^mn> 'ML UNIVERSITY SELECT LIST OF REFERENCES ON BOYCOTTS AND INJUNC- TIONS IN LABOR DISPUTES Adams, Thomas S. Strikes and boycotts. (In Adams, Thomas S., and Helen L. Sumner. Labor problems, pp. 175-212. New York, 1905. 8°.) References: pp. 212-213. HD8073.A25 Allen, Charles Claflin. Injunction and organized labor. A paper read at the seventeenth annual meeting of the American bar association held at Saratoga, August 22, 1894. [n. p., 1894?] 35 pp. 8°. Reprinted from the Transactions of the Association, v. 17, pp. 299- 331. Published also in American law review, Nov.-Dec, 1894, v. 28, pp. 828-859; in Albany law journal, Sept. 1, 1894, v. 50, pp. 140-151; in Western law times, Aug.-Nov., 1894, v. 5, pp. 81-92, 103-110, 119-^135; in American lawyer, v. 2, p. 434, and in Ohio legal news, V. 1, p. 513. 8-11232 HD7819.TJ5A7 American academy of political and social science, Philadelphia. Administration of justice in the United States. Philadelphia: AToerican academy of political and social science, 1910. v, {2), 3-263 pp. 4°. (The annals of the American academy of political and social science, vol. xxxvi, no. 1.) The scope and limits of the injunction, pp. 85-141. Contents. — Introductory address, by 0. P. Neill; Use and abuse of injunc- tions in trade disputes, by J. H. Ralston, C. E. Littlefield, J. A. Emery, and A. Furuseth. 10-15614 Hl.A4,v.36 HV7405.A6 American and English decisions in equity. Being select cases decided in the appellate courts of America and England. With notes. Annual. First series. Philadelphia: M. Murphy, 1895-1905. 10 vols. 8°. No more published. Contents relating to injunctions and boycotts in labor cases: Vol. 2 (1896), pp. 364-414. Injunction — strikes — interstate com- merce — obstruction of the mails — contempt. In re Debs, peti- tioner. (Supreme court of the United States. May 27, 1895: 158 U. S., 564; 15 Sup. ct. rep., 900.) 3 4 LIBKAEY OP CONGKEfcS American and English decisions in equity — Continued. Vol. 3 (1897), pp. 530-546. Injunction — criminal acts — labor unions — conspiracy to injure business. Vegelahn v. Guntner et al. (Supreme judicial court of Massachusetts. Oct. 27, 1896; 44N.E. rep., 1077.) Vol. 7 (1901), pp. 557-566. Flaccus v. Smith et al. (Supreme court of Pennsylvania. Apr. 15, 1901; 199 Pa., 128; 48 Atl. rep., 894. Affirming 30 Pitts. L. J., N. S. (Pa.), 129.) Vol. 7 (1901), pp. 567-599. Injunction — trades unions — conspiracy to deprive non-union workmen of employment. Plant et al. v. Woods et al. (Supreme judicial court of Massachusetts. Sept. 6, 1900; 176 Mass., 492; 57 N. E. rep., 1011.) Vol. 9 (1903), pp. 285-288. Injunctions against libelous publica- tions in reference to strikes, boycotts, and other labor matters. Vol. 10 (1905), pp. 548-576. Injunction — interference with employ- ment — ^labor unions — ^rival organizations — compelling discharge of employ^ — constitutional rights. Erdman v. Mitchell. (Supreme court of Pennsylvania. Oct. 12, 1903; 207 Pa., 79; 56 Atl. rep., 327. Affirming 10 D. E., 701.) American digest ; a complete digest of all reported American cases from the earliest times to 1896. [Century ed.] St. Paul: West fublisUng co., 1897-1904. 50 vols. 4°. "Conspiracy" : v. 10, col. 1095-1200. See sect. 10, relatingto boycotts. "Injunction": v. 27, col. 1415-2391. See sect. 174 (Boycotts, strikes and other combinations); 175 (Interference with employes); 177 (Criminal conspiracies and combinations). See also under heading Monopolies. Nov. 9, 98-1* Decennial edition of the American digest; a complete digest of all reported cases from 1897 to 1906. vol. 1-19. St. Paul: West puhlisTiing CO., 1908-10. 19 vols. 4°- {Amer- ican digest system.) "Injunction": v. 10, pp. 1765-2044. See sect. 101 (Boycotts and other combinations), pp. 1881-1889. See also under heading Monopolies. 8-17767 American digest annotated; key-number series, vol. 1-8. Con- tinuing without omission or dupUcation the Century edition of the American digest, 1658 to 1896, and the Decennial edition, 1897 to 1906. A digest of all current decisions of all the American courts, as reported in the National reporter system, the oflBcial reports, and else- where, from Oct. 1, 1906, to Mar. 31, 1910. Prepared and ed. by the editorial staff of the American digest system. St. Paul, Minn.: West publishing co., 1907-10. 8 vols. 4°. See entries under Conspiracy and Injunction. AND INJUNCTIONS 5 American federation of labor. Supreme court of the United States. October term, 1910. No. 190. The Buck's stove & range company, vs. the American federation of labor, et at, appellee. No. 372 (or old no. 685). Samuel Gompers, John Mitchell and Frank Morrison, petitioners, vs. the Buck's stove & range company, respondent. Brief in reply to appellant's brief in no. 372 (or old no. 685). New York: WiUiam R. FicJce co., [1910]. 35 pp. 8°. Cover-title. Kalston, Siddons & Richardson, solicitors for appellees in no. 190; for appellants in no. 394; for petitioners in no. 372 (or old no. 685). Alton B. Parker, Jackson H. Ralston, F. L. Siddons, W. E. Rich- ardson, John T. Walker, of counsel. In the Supreme court of the United States. October term, 1910. No. 190. The Buck's stove & range company, appellant, vs. the American federation of labor et al., appellees. No. 394. The American federation of labor et al., appellants, vs. the Buck's stove & range company, appellee. Brief on behalf of the American federation of labor et al., appellees in no. 190 and appellants in no. 394. [Washington, D. C: Judd & Detweiler, inc., printers, 1910.] 54 pp. 8°. Cover-title. Jackson H. Ralston, Frederick L. Siddons, William E. Richardson, appellants' solicitors. Alton B. Parker, John T. Walker, of counsel. Supreme court of the United States. October term, 1910. No. 190. The Buck's stove & range company, appellant, vs. the American federation of labor, et al., appellee. No. 394. The American federation of labor, et al., appellants, vs. the Buck's stove & range company, appellee. No. 372. Samuel Gompers, John Mitchell and Frank Morrison, petitioners, vs. the Buck's stove & range company, respondent. Brief for appellants in no. 394 and for petitioner in no. 372. New YorTc: WiUiam R. FicTce co., [1910]. 171 pp. 8°. Cover-title. Old no. 685 changed to no. 372 on cover. Ralston, Siddons & Richardson, solicitors for appellees in no. 190; for appellants in no. 394; for petitioners in no. 685. Alton B. Parker, Jackson H. Ralston, F. L. Siddons, W. E. Richardson, John T. Walker, of counsel. Buck's stove and range company injunction suit and con- tempt proceedings. Washington, D. C: [American federation of labor], 1910. 37, (i) pp. 8°. Bibliography: p. 13. 10-6187 HD7819.U5A7 6 LIBBABY OF CONGEESS American federation, of labor. Memorial of international and national trade and labor unions, remonstrating against the inaction of Congress in the matter of legislation in the interest of organized labor and urging the necessity for im- mediate action for relief from the results to come from the literal enforcement of the Sherman antitrust law. [Washington, Government printing office, 1908.] 8 pp. 8°. {60th Congress, 1st session. Senate doc. 4OO.) 5265 Signed by the oflScers of the American federation of labor and of numerous other labor organizations. Reprinted in American federationist, Apr., 1908, v. 15, pp. 261-266. 8-35313 HD8072.A5 Report of proceedings of the annual convention, 1881-date. Cincinnati [etc.], 1882-date. The reports since 1893 include much material bearing on the ques- tions of boycotts and injunctions. 8-23471t HD8055.A5A3 Beach, Charles Fisk. Commentaries on the law of injunctions as determined by the courts and statutes of England and the United States. Albany: R. B. Parsons, 1896. 2 vols. 8°. "Relating to strikes, boycotts and monopolies": v. 1, pp. 505-528. Bell, Richard. Trade unionism. London and Edinburgh: T. C. & E. C. Jack, 1907. (4.), 108 pp. 12°. {The social problems series, ed. by Oliphant Smeaton, [no. iii].) Includes a history of the "Taff-Vale case." 8-34738 HD6664.B4 Benton, Josiah Henry, jr. What is ' 'government by injunction ?' ' Does it exist in the United States? Annual address before the Grafton and Coos bar association, January 28, 1898. Concord, N. H.: The Rumford press, 1898. 110 pp. 8°. 8-11233 HD7819.TJ5B3 Bishop, James, jr. Government by injunction. {In Georgia bar association. Report of the nineteenth annual ses-^ sion, July 3-5, 1902, pp. 283-288. Atlanta, 1902. 8°.) Bolen, George Lewis. Getting a living; the problem of wealth and poverty — of profits, wages and trade unionism. New York, London: The Macmillan company, 1903. xii, 769 pp. 8°. "The injunction in labor disputes": pp. 548-580. 3-28542 HD8072.B62 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS 7 Bryan, James Wallace. The development of the English law of conspiracy. Baltimore: The Johns EopMns press, 1909. 161 pp. 8°. {Johns HopJcins university studies in historical and political science. Series xxvii, nos. S-4-5.) "Abbreviations for authorities cited": pp. 159-161. "Combinations of labor": pp. 115-158. 9-11161 H31.J6,ser.27 Bryan, William Jennings. Speeches, revised and arranged by him- self. With a biographical introduction by Mary Baird Bryan, his wife. New York and London: Funk da WagnaUs company, 1909. 2 vols. Frontispieces (portraits). 16°. Speech discussing injunctions, delivered in Chicago, Sept. 7, 1908: V. 2, pp. 164-180. 9-30038 Buck's stove and ranger company, St. Louis, Mo. In the Supreme court of the United States. October term, 1910. No. 190. The Buck's stove and range company, appellant, vs. American federation of labor, appellees. No. 394. American federation of labor, et al., appellants, vs. the Buck's stove and range company, appellee. Brief for the Buck's stove and range company. Washington, D. C: Press ofB. S. Adams, [1910]. 96 pp. 8°. Cover-title. Daniel Davenport, J. J. Darlington, solicitors. In the Supreme court of the United States. October term, 1910. No. 372. Samuel Gompers, John Mitchell, and Frank Morrison, petitioners, vs. Buck's stove & range company, respondent. Brief for respondent. Washinffton, D. C: Press ofB. S. Adams, [1910]. 74 pp. 8°. Cover-title. Daniel Davenport, J. J. Darlington, attorneys. In the Supreme court of the United States. October term, 1910. 190. The Buck's stove & range company, appel- lant, vs. the American federation of labor, et al., appellees. 372. Samuel Gompers, John Mitchell, and Frank Morri- son, petitioners, vs. the Buck's stove & range company, respondent. 394. The American federation of labor, et al., appellants, vs. the Buck's stove & range company, appellee. Supplemental and reply brief for appellant in no. 190, respondent in no. 372, and appellee in no. 394. Washington, D. C: Press ofB. S. Adams, [1910]. 25 pp. 8°. Cover-title. Daniel Davenport, J. J. Darlington, solicitors. 8 LIBKABY OF CONGEESS Buck's stove and range company. In the Supreme court of the District of Columbia. The Buck's stove & range co. plaintiff vs. the American federation of labor, et al. defendants. In equity, no. 27,305. Copies of pleadings, preliminary injunction order, opinion of Justice Gould, and testimony on hearing for permanent injunction. J. J. Darlington, solicitor for. plaintiff. James M. Beck, Daniel Davenport, of counsel. [ WasUngton, 1908.] ii, 862 ff. 8°. Cover-title. 8-25859 — • Transcript of record. Supreme court of the United States, October term, 1910. No. 190. The Buck's stove & range company, appellant, vs. the American federation of labor, Samuel Gompers, Frank Morrison, et al. Filed April 10, 1909. No. 394. The American federation of labor, Samuel Gompers, Frank Morrison, et al., appel- lants, vs. the Buck's stove & range company. Filed December 30, 1909. Appeals from the Court of appeals of the District of Columbia. (21,593 and 21,946.) [Washington, D. C: Judd & Detweiler, (inc.), printers, 1909.] (2), vi, 677 pp. 8°. Cover-title. Title read originally: October term, 1909. No. 414 ... no. 720. Record of proceedings in the Supreme court and Court of appeals of the District of Columbia. The opinion of the court in the appeal case (pp. 635-667) will be found also in "Beports of cases adjudged in the Court of appeals of the District of Columbia," v. 33 (1910), pp. 83-132. Transcript of record. Supreme court of the United States. October term, 1910. No. 372. Samuel Gompers, John Mitchell, and Frank Morrison, petitioners, vs. the Buck's stove & range company. On writ of certiorari to the Court of appeals of the District of Columbia. Petition for certiorari filed November 27, 1909. Certiorari and return filed February 18, 1910. (21,911). [Washington, D. C: Judd & Detweiler, (inc.), printers, 1910.] Hi, 687 pp. 8°. Cover- title. Title read originally: October term, 1909. No. 685. Record of proceedings in the Supreme court and Court of appeals of the District of Columbia. Burns, W. F. The Pullman boycott. A complete history of the great R. R. strike. St. Paul: The McGiU printing co., 1894. w, 7-318 pp. Frontispiece (portrait). 12°. 7-29955.t HD5325.B12.1894.C53 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS 9 Carland, John E. "Government by injunction." {In South Dakota bar association. Report of the proceedings of the meeting held for the purpose of organizing the association, Dec. 7, 1897, pp. 23-31. Sioux Falls, [1897?]. 8°.) Charnock, Singleton. Injunctions in labor disputes and the rem- edy. ReTw: Nevada press co., [1910]. 20 pp. Portrait. 8°. 10-11555 HD7819.t75C6 » Clark, John Bates. Essentials of economic theory as appUed to modern problems of industry and public pohcy. New York: The MacmiUan company, 1907. xiv, (2), 666 pp. Diagrams. 8°. "Boycotts and the limiting of products " : pp. 503-516. 7-36896 HB171.C57 Clayton, Henry D. The President and injunctions. Speech in the House of Eepresentatives, May 30, 1908. {In Congressional record, 60th Congress, 1st session, v. 42, pt. 8, Appendix, pp. 573-587. Washington, 1908. 4°.) Jll.R5,v.42,pt.8 Cogley, Thomas Sydenham. The law of strikes, lockouts and labor organizations. Washington, D. C: W. H. LowdermiTk <& co., 1894- xiv, (2), 377 pp. 8°. Reviewed in American law review, July-Aug., 1894, v. 28, pp. * 629-638. "Strikes as conspiracies — ^boycotts, picketing, blacklisting": pp. 247-295; "Civil remedies — inequity: by iujunction " : pp. 342-346. 2-20181 HD5317.Xr4C7 Cohen, Hermann Joseph, and George Howell. Trade union law and cases, a text book relating to trade unions and to labour. London: Sweet — Injunctions in labor disputes; report read at meeting of the Social reform club, New York, May 22, 1900. — The modern use of injunctions, by F. J. Stimson — Receivership of the Northern Pacific railroad company. Report from the Committee on the judiciary, June 8, 1894. House report no. 1049, 53d Congress, 2d session. — Report of case, arguments, and decision of the court in Commonwealth [of Massachusetts] v. Hunt (4 Mete). 3-7052 57ih Congress, 2d session, 1902-1903. Senate. Petitions and remonstrances for and against the passage of the bills (S. 1118, S. 4553, and H. R. 11060) "To limit the meaning of the word 'conspiracy' and the use of 'restraining orders and injunctions* in certain cases," with a Hst of organiza- tions so petitioning. Washington: Government printing office, 1903. I4I PP- 8°. ■ {57ih Congress, 2d session. Senate doc. no. 115.) 4424 eoth Congress, 1st session, 1907-1908. Senate. Certain injunction and labor cases. Papers. [ Washington: Government printing office, 1908.] 4^ pp. 8°. (60th Congress, 1st session. Senate doc. too. 504.y 5266 a-35503 HD7819.TJ5A5 1908 Paper relating to case of Hitchman coal and coke company v. John Mitchell et al [ Washington: Government printing office, 1908.] 6 pp. 8°. (fiOih Congress, 1st session. Senate doc. no. 502.) 5269 8-35480 HD7819.TT5A5 1908a 26 LIBKABY OF CONGKESS United States. 60th Congress, 1st session, 1907-1908. Senate. Eegulfttion of injxmctions. DDebate on Senate bill 3732, regulating injunctions and the practice of the district and circuit courts of the United States. Apr. 17, 1908.] {In Congressional record, 60th Congress, 1st session, v. 42, pt. 5, pp. 4846-4859. Washington, 1908. 4°.) Jll.R5,v.42,pt. 5 Senate resolution 81. [In Congressional record, 60th Congress, 1st session, Jan. 23, 1908, V. 42, pt. 2, pp. 1009-1016. Washington, 1908. 4°.) Directs the Committee on the judiciary of the Senate or any subcom- mittee thereof "to speedily investigate and inquire into all of the circumstancea connected with the issuance of a restraiuing order in the case of Hitchman coal and coke company, plaintiff, against John Mitchell and other defendants in the United States circuit court for the northern district of West Virginia, on October 24, 1907," and "to report to the Senate whether any additional legis- lation is hecessary for the protection of the rights and privileges of workingmen; and if so, to report such legislation without delay." Various papers relating to the case are included. Jll.B5,v.42,pt.2 William H. Weber and John Haddow. Papers on the imprisonment of William H. Weber and John Had- dow for alleged contempt of court, and their pardon by the President. [ WasTiington: Government 'printing office, 1908.] 11 pp. 8°. (60th Congress, 1st session. Senate doc. no. 524-) 8266 Weber and Haddow were sent to prison by a federal court in Virginia for alleged violation of an injunction . 8-35484 HD7819.TJ5A5 1908b Congress. House. Committee on the judiciary. An act to regulate commerce, etc. Hearings on House bill 19745 before subcommittee no. 3 of the Committee on the judi- ciary. House of Representatives. 60th Congress, 1st ses- sion, [April 4-May 1, 1908]. Washington: Government printing office, 1908. 749 pp. 8°. The Hepburn amendment to the Sherman anti-trust act of 1890. Charles E. Littlefield, chairman of subcommittee. 8-35497 HD2773 1908 Argument of Mr. Samuel Gompers. Priated by order of the Committee. Washington: Government printing office, 1908. 24 pp. 8°. Kegarding the use of injunctions in labor disputes. 8-35229 HD7819.XT5A4 1908 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS 27 United States. Pongiress. House. Committee on the juiiciary. Argument of Mr. T. C. Spelling in f^vor of the so-called anti-ifljunctioiq. bilk and all labor biUs. Washin^on: Got^mmment printing office, 19Q8. 89 pp. 8°. Includes arguir •'nt of Samuel Gompers, pp. 39-62. Mr. Spelling' s argument was also {Minted as Senate document no. 525, 60tli popgress, 1st aa^ipn 8-35391 HD7819.TT5A4 1908a An.ti-in.jun,ctiou bill. Cpmplete hearings before the Committee ou the judiciary of the House of Representa- tives on the bill (H. R. 89) entitled "A bill to limit the meaning of the word 'conspiracy' and the use of 'restrain- ing orders and injunctions' in certain cases." January 13-March 22, 1904. Washington: Government printing office, 1904- (^), 714 PP- 8°. John J. Jenkins, chairman. "House report no. 1522, Fifty-seventh Congress, first session. Lim- iting the meaning of the word conspiracy " : pp. 354-391. 9-30480 HD7819.TJ5A4 1904 Contempts of court. Export from the Committee on the judiciary, Jan. 8, 1897. [ Washington: Government printing office, 1897.] 4 PP- ^°- (,54th Congress, 2d session. House report no. 2471.) 3555 Views of the minority. Jan. 11, 1897. [ Washington: Government printing office, 1897.] 2 pp. 8°. {54th Congress, 2d session. House report no. 2471, pt. 2.) 3555 Reprinted in Senate document no. 190, 57th Congress, 1st session, pp. 5-10. Hearings on the so-called anti-injunction bills and aU labor biUs. Printed by order of the Committee. Washington: Government printing office, 1908. 151 pp." 8°. John J. Jenkins, chairman. Includes arguments of T. C. Spelling and Samuel Gompers, and statement of Daniel Davenport. 9-31054 HD7819.U5A4 1908b Limiting the meaning of the word conspiracy. Report, to accompany H. R. 11060. Apr. 10, 1902. [ Washington: Government printing office, 1902.] 22 pp. 8°. (57th Congress, 1st session. House report no. 1522.) 4404 Submitted by Mr. Ray. 28 LIBEAEY OF CONGRESS United States. Congress. House. Committee on the judiciary. Views of the minority. [ Washington: Government 'printing office, 1902.] 16 pp. 8°. (67 fh Congress, 1st session. House report no. 1522, pt. 2.) 4404 Submitted by Mr. Littlefield. Meaning of the word "conspiracy," etc. Keport, to accompany H. E. 8917. June 5, 1900. [Washington: Government printing office, 1900.] 2 pp. 8°. (56th Congress, 1st session. House report no. 1987.) 4027 Submitted by Mr. Littlefield. Meaning of the word "conspiracy," etc. Report, to accompany H. E. 8917. Dec. 3, 1900. [ Washington: Government printing office, 1900.] 3 pp. 8°. (56th Congress, 2d session. House report no. 2007.) 4212 Submitted by Mr. Littlefield. Limit of meaning of the word "conspiracy." Feb. 4, o 1901. Views of the minority. [Washington: Government printing office, 1901.] 2 pp. 8 (56th Congress, 2d session. House report no. 2007, pt. 2.) 4212 Submitted by Mr. Fleming. Eeceivership of the Northern Pacific railroad com- pany. Eeport from the Committee on the judiciary. June 8, 1894. [ Washington: Government printing office, 1894.] ^^ PP- ^°- (5Sd Congress, 2d session. House report no. 1049.) 3271 An investigation and inquiry "into all the circumstances connected with the issuance of writs of injunction in the case of the Farmers' loan and trust company, complainant, against the Northern Pacific railroad company." Keprinted in Senate document no. 190, 57th Congress, Ist session, pp. 122-143. Eeport of a hearing before the Committee, March 23, 1900, on the bill "To Umit the meaning of the word 'conspiracy,' and also the use of 'restraining orders and injunctions,' as applied to disputes between employers and employees in the District of Columbia and territories, or engaged in commerce between the several states. Dis- trict of Columbia, and territories, and with foreign na- tions." December 20, 1900. — Ordered to be printed, to accompany S. 4233. Washington: Government printing office, 1900. (2), 73 pp. 8°. (56th Congress, 2d session. Senate doc. nx). 58.) 4033 Reprinted in Senate document no. 190, 57th Congress, 1st session, pp. 11-85. 2-24775 HD7819.XJ5A4 1900 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS 29 XTnited States. Coiigress. Senate. Committee on the judiciary. Federal injunctions. Hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on the judiciary, United States Senate, on the bill, S. 3724, a bill regulating injunctions and the practice of the district and circuit courts of the United States, [January 27 to February 3,1910]. Washington: Government printing office, 1910. 63 pf. 8°. 10-35202 JK1542.A5 1910 Report, to accompany S. 2984, on the subject of "contempts of court," as enforced by the federal courts. Apr. 30, 1896. [Washington: Government printing office, 1896,] 2 pp. 8°. {54th Congress, 1st session. Senate report no. 827.) 3365 Submitted by Mr. Hill. Reprinted in Senate dociiment no. 190, 57th Congress, 1st session, pp. 3-4. Courts. Federal anti-trust decisions. Cases decided in the United States courts arising under, involving, or growing out of the enforcement of the anti-trust act of July 2, 1890 (26 Stat., 209), including a few somewhat similar decisions not based upon that act, 1890-1899. Prepared and edited by James A. Finch, by direction of the attorney- general. Washington: Government printing office, 1907. 2 vols. 8°. See indexes under Combinations, conspiracies, etc., and under Labor organizations. 7-35252 HD2780.A2 Industrial commission. Final report. Prepared in accord- ance with an act of Congress approved June 18, 1898. Washington: Government printing office, 1902. xi, 1259 pp. Maps. Diagrams. 8°. {The commission's Reports, vol. xix.) "Injunctions in labor disputes": pp. 885-890. 4-18105/2 HC101.A3,v.l9 — ■ Report on labor legislation. Washington: Government printing office, 1900. (2), 308 pp. 8°. ( The commission's Reports, vol. v.) Includes digests of existing statutes of the states and territories, as follows: General labor, by Frederic Jesup Stimson. — Convict labor, by Victor H. Olmsted and William M. Steuart. — Mine labor, by Edward Dana Durand in collaboration with Eugene Willison. "As to enforcement of the labor contract by injunction or otherwise " : pp. 67-68; "Strikes, boycotts, pickets, etc.": pp. 129-140. 30 LIBBAEY OF CONGRESS TJuited states. IvdustrioH commission — Continued. For a later record pf legislation relating to injunctions, boycotts, etc., see the 22d annual report (for 1907) of the United States Bureau of labor, and the Bulletin, issued bi-monthly by the same Bureau. 4-18095/7 HC101.A3,v.5 Keports on labor organizations, labor disputes, and arbitration [by Charles E. Edgerton and E. Dana Durand] and on railway labor [by Samuel McCune Lindsay]. Washington: Government printing office, 1901. cxxxvii, 1172 pp. Map. Tables. 8°. (The commission's Reports, vol. xvii.) ' ' Laws and pourt decisions as to labor combinations " (pp. cxiv-cxxv, 547-629) including: Table of citations; General considerations; English law as to strikes and labor combinations; Legality of strikes in themselves; Enticement of employees; Combinations to procure discharge or prevent employment; Intimidation and picketing; Boycotts; Railway strikes and boycotts: (a) General principles laid down by courts; (b) Specific acts and methods of strikers held illegal by the courts; (c) Legislation as to strikes on railways; The injunction in labor disputes: (a) Court decisions as to injunctions; (b) Legal criticisms on extended use of injunc- tion; Legal position of trade unions 4-18103/8 HC101.A3,v. 17 Report on the condition of foreign legislation upon matters affecting general labor. [Prepared by Frederic Jesup Stimson]. WasTiington: Government printing office, 1901. Hi, 2^2 pp. 8°. {The commission's Reports, vol. xvi.) Strikes, boycotts, etc.: pp. 166-171 4-18102/3 HC101.A3,v.l6 Strike commission, 189^. Report on the Chicago strike of June-July, 1894, with appendices containing testimony, proceedings, and recommendations. Washington: Govemmentprinting office, f 895. liv,681pp. 8°. Pub. also as Senate exec. doc. no. 7, 53d Congress, 3d session. Commissioners: Carroll D. Wright, John D. Kernan, Nicholas E. Worthington. 8-32032 HD5325.B,13.C582 Voorliees, Daniel W. Resolution [in regard to the injunction issued by Judge Jenkins of the United States circuit court for the eastern district of Wisconsin in the case of the Farmers' loan and trust company, complainant, against the North- em Pacific railroad company] . In the Senate of the United States. Feb. 8, 1894. [Washington: Government printing office, 1894.] ^ PP- 8°. iSSd Congress, 2d session. Senate misc. doc. no. 78.) 3167 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS 31 Waring, Luther Hess. The law and the gospel of labor. New York and Washington: The Neale publishing company, 1907. 140 pp. 12°. "The law as to boycotts": pp. 49-59; "The law as to injunctions": pp. 61-70. 7-29710 HD6496.TJ4W2 Watson, Samuel. The Ann Arbor cases. {In Tennessee bar association. Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting, July 13-14, 1893, pp. 205-209. Nashville, 1894. 8°.) Willingham, Wright. Labor unions and kindred organizations from the lawyer's standpoint. {In Georgia bar association. Report of the 25th annual session, May 28-29, 1908, pp. 178-194. Macon, [1908]. 8°.) Reprinted in American legal news, Jan. 1909, v. 20, pp. 5-11. 67382°— 11 3 ARTICLES IN PERIODICALS 1884. Thompson, Seymour D. Injunctions against criminal acts. American law review, July-Aug., I884, v. 18: 699-617. 1885. Sartorius von Waltershausen, A. Boycotten, ein neues Kampfmittel der amerikanischen Gewerkvereine. Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistilc, 1885, v. 4^: 1-18. HB5.J3,v.45 1885. Interdicts against dealing with particular traders. Irish law times, Jan. 24, 1885, v. 19: 43~45- 1885. Actionable boycotting. Irish law timesy Aug. 22, 1885, v. 19: 448-444. Reprinted in Weekly law bulletin, Oct. 12, 1885, v. 14, pp. 232-234; and in Washington law reporter, Oct. 24, 1885, v. 13, pp. 669-671. 1885. Boycotting. Justice of the peace, Oct. 31, 1885, v. 49: 689-691. 1886. Hammond, William A. The evolution of the boycott. Forum, June, 1886, v. 1: 369-376. AP2.F8,v.l 1886. Mason, James M. The legal aspect of the strike and boycott. Kansas law journal, June 12, 1886, v. 3: 273-279. 1886. Thacher, Sherman D. Boycotiting. New Englander, Dec, 1886, v. 45: 1038-1042. ap3.N5,v.45 1886. Stephen, James Fitzjames. On the suppression of boycotting. Nineteenth century, Dec, 1886, v. 20: 765-784. AP4.N7,v.20 1886. Atkins, Thomas S. The criminahty of boycotting; [charge deUvered to the grand jury of the Hustings court of Richmond, Va., Sept. 28, 1886]. Virginia law journal, Dec, 1886, v. 10: 707-709. Reprinted in Irisli law times, Jan. 8, 1887, v. 21, pp. 17-18. 1887. Brigham, Chfford. Strikes and boycotts as indictable con- spiracies at common law. American law review, Jan.-Feb., 1887, v. 21: 4ir^9. Reprinted in Irisli law times, Feb. 26, Mar. 5, 12, 1887, v. 21, pp. 115-118, 131-134, 146-147. 32 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 33 1887. Dorman, Lester M. The boycott and its methods. Criminal law magazine, Jan., 1887, v. 9: 1-15. The criminality of boycotting; charge of Judge Atkins of the Rich- mond (Va.) Hustings court, Sept. 28, 1886: pp. 15-17. 1887. An American view of boycotting. Irish law times, Apr. 23, 1887, v. 21: 228-229. Reprinted from the New York chronicle. 1887. Wellford, B. K., jr. The legality of boycotting; [opinion delivered in the circuit court of Richmond, Va., Feb. 7, 1887]. " Virginia law journal, Ajpr., 1887, v. 11: 196-202. 1887. Atkins, Thomas S. The law of conspiracy: boycotting; [opinion delivered in the Hustings court of Richmond, Va., Feb. 7, 1887]. Virginia law journal, June, 1887, v. 11: 32^-831. 1887. Wigmore, John H. The boycott and kindred practices as ground for damages. American law review, July-August, 1887, v. 21: 509-532. 1888. Selfridge, Arthur James. American law of strikes and boy- cotts as crimes. American law review, Mar.-Apr., 1888, v. 22: 233-250. Reprinted in Irish law times. May 5, 19, 1888, v. 22, pp. 218-220, 242-244. 1888. Actionable boycotting. IrisJi law times, Sept. 8, 15, 1888, v. 22: 451-452, 465-466. 1889. Cheyney, E. P. Decisions of the courts in conspiracy and boycott cases. Political science quarterly, June, 1889, v. 4' 261-278. Hl.P8,v.4 1891. Burnett, John. The boycott as an element in trade disputes. Economic journal, Mar., 1891, v. 1: 163-173. HBl.E3,v.l 1892. McMurtrie, Richard C. Equity jurisdiction applied to crimes and misdemeanors. American law register and review, Jan., 1892, v. 31: 1-17. 1892. Courts of equity and intimidation by labor unions. National corporation reporter, Oct. 8, 15, 1892, v. 5: 99-100, 124. 1892. Lewis, William Draper. Injunctions to restrain libels, and courts of criminal equity. [Editorial]. American law register and review, Nov., 1892, v. 31: 782-797. 34 LIBEAEY OF CONGRESS 1893. Federal injunctions against boycotts. [Notes], American law review, May-June, 1893, v. 27: 405-410. 1893. Lewis, William Draper. The courts and striking railroad employees. The Ann Arbor cases. [Editorial note]. American law register and review, May, 1893, v. 82: 481-489. 1893. Walker, Aldace F. Kecent labor rulings by federal courts. Forum, May, 1893, v. 15: 311-322. AP2.r8,v.l5 1893. Actionable boycotting. Law times, May 6, 1893, v. 95: 5-6. 1893. Gunton, George. Economics of strikes and boycotts. Social economist. May, 1893, v. 4: 257-266. Hl.G9,v.4 1893. [Comment on recent court decisions relating to labor unions]. Yale review. May, 1893, v. 2: 8-12. Hl.Y2,v.3 1893. Mason, Norman T. Organized labor and the law. American journal of politics, Aug., 1893, v. S: 188-196. Hl.A5,v.3 1893. Dickson, Charles A. Boycotting. Central law journal, Sept. 1, 1893, v. 37: 166-169. Reprinted in Albany law journal, Sept. 30, 1893, v. 48, pp. 269-271. 1894. [Lewis, WUliam Draper.] Injunction to keep men at work. [Editorial]. American law register and review, Jan., 1894, v. 33: 81-82. 1894. Lewis, William Draper. Injunctions to restrain strikes again. [Notes and comments on recent decisions]. American law register and review, Feb., 1894, '"■ 33: 147-150. 1894. Enjoining a threatened railway strike. American law review, Mar.-Apr., 1894, '*>• ■^^•" 269-272. 1894. Pingrey, D. H. Boycotting, its legal phase. Central law journal. May 18, 1894, v. 38: 4£7-430. 1894. BuUard, Herbert S. The injunction as a remedy for the boycott. Yale law journal, June, 1894, v. 3: 211-217. 1894. The law of strikes. [Notes]. American law review, July-Aug., 1894,. v. ^8: 587-591. BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 35 1894. Reed, Chester A. Peaceable boycotting. American academy of political and social science. Annals, July, 1894, V. 5: 28^7. Hl.A4,v5. A defence of the boycott and an argument against the use of the injunction as a means of suppressing it. 1894. Selover, George H. Boycotts as conspiracies. Minnesota law journal, July, 1894, ^- ^•' 167-173. 1894. Stewart, Ardemus. The legal side of the strike question. Am^can law register and review, Sept., 1894, v. S3: 609-622. 1894. Bateman, Warner M. Injunctions against labor unions. [Letter]. Central law journal, Sept. 28, 1894, v. 39: 265-266. 1894. The Debs case. [Editorial]. Nation, Sept. 13, 1894, v. 59: 190-191. AP2.Br2,v.50 "The issue is briefly the determination of the question whether courts shall assume the function of inflicting summary punish- ment without jury trial for acts punishable by ordinary criminal proceeding." 1894. Aiken, Wilham P. Legal restraint of labor strikes. Yale law journal, Oct., 1894, '"■ 4- 13-26. 1894. Gregory, S. S. The Debs case. Chicago legal news, Nov. 3, 1894, ^- ^'^•' 82. On the question of the constitutionality of the issuance of an injxinction in this case. 1894. Lewis, W. D. A protest against administering criminal law by injunction — the Debs case. . American law register and review, Dec, 1894, 'O- 33: 879-883. 1895. Philips, John F. Strikes and injunctions. Am,erican lawyer, 1895, v. 3: 18. 1895. Heckel, Max von. Der Boykott. JahrbucTier fur NationaloJconomie und StatistiTc, 1895, v. 65: 481-510. HB5.J3,v.65 "Benutzte Quellen und Litteratur: " p. 481. 1895. Erwin, James S. Are strikes preventable by judicial action? Criminal law magazine, Jan., 1895, v. 17: 1-10. 1895. Stanton, Stephen B. The mandamus as a means of settling strikes. American law register and review, Feb., 1895, v. 34: 102-119. 36 LIBBAEY OP CONGBESS 1895. Government by injunction. [Note]. American law review, Mar. -Apr., 1895, v. 29 1895. Stimson, F. J. The modem use of injunctions. Political science quarterly, June, 1895, v. 10: 189-^ Hl.P8,v.lO Reprinted in Senate document, no. 190, 57th Congress, Ist session, pp. 114-121. 4234 1895. Upson, William H. Injunctions and strikes. Bibliotheca sacra, July, 1895, v. 52: 5^9-552. 1895. Strikes and boycotting. Irisli law times, July 13, 1895, v. 29: 839-340. 1896. Lorimer, J. C. Trade union — freedom of contract — malice — picketing. Juridical review, 1896, v. 8: 319-321. Reprinted in American law review, Sept.-Oct., 1896, v. 30, pp. 763-765. 1896. Injunction— strikes. Hamilton-Brown shoe co. v. Saxey et al. Supreme court of Missouri, Division no. 1, Nov. 26, 1895. [Annotated case]. Central law journal, Jan. 24, 1896, v. 42: 74-78. 1896. Woollen, Evans. Labor and the injunction. Yale review, May, 1896, v. 5: 39-60. Hl.Y2,v.5 1896. Government by injunction. Gunton's magazine, Oct., 1896, v. 11: 242-248. Hl.(59,v.ll 1896. Yarros, Victor. Labor's rights in the courts. American federationist, Nov., 1896, v. 3: 181-183. HD805d.A5A2,v.3 1896. Injunction — conspiracy to injure business. Vegelahn v. Guntner. Supreme judicial court of Massachusetts, Oct. 27, 1896. [Annotated case]. Central law journal, Dec. 4, 1896, v. 43: 464-466. 1896. Curtis, Leonard E. Labor riots and so-called "government by injunction." Engineering magazine, Dec., 1896, v. 12: 381-394. TAl.E59,v.l2 1896. "Picketing." Injunctions against strikers. Harvard law review, Dec. 26, 1896, v. 10: 301. BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PEBIODICALS 37 1897. Labor combinations and the law. AOtany law journal, Apr. 17, 1897, v. 56: 250-251. B«printed from the Boaton herald. 1897. Government by injunction. Arnerican federationist, June, 1897, v. 4- 82. An interview with Samuel Gompers, from the Washington post. HD8066.A5A2,v.4 1897. Barker, Wharton. Are the rights of capital superior to the rights of man ? American (PUladelpMa), Aug. 21, 1897, v. 27: 117-119. AP2.A317,v.a7 A criticism of the action of certain courts of Pennsylvania and West Virginia in enjoining striking coal miners from communicating with miners continuing at work. 1897. Sedgwick, A. G. The strike injunctions. Nation, Aug. 26, 1897, v. 65: 160-161. ap2.N2,v.66 1897. Federal injunction against strikes and lockouts in West Vir- ginia. American law review, Sept.-Oct., 1897, v. SI: 761-76 4. 1897. Gompers, Samuel. Injunctions tmrespected. As a factor in strikes they must go. [Editorial]. American federationist, Sept., 1897, v. 4: 159-160. HB8055.A5A2,v.4 1897. Injunctions ia labor disputes. Chicago times-herald, Sept. 19, 1897, v. 44, pt. 3: 25-28. The following questions were submitted by the Sunday times-herald toeminent jurists and prominent laymen: 1. What are your views on the power and practice of courts in issuing injunctions in labor disputes? 2. How is such power derived, and is it misused? 3. Do injunctions interfere with- the constitutional guarantee of trial by jury? 4. Should Congress specifically define and limit the power of courts in issuing injunctions? Among others, replies were received from P. S. Grosscup, Murray P. Tuley, James McCabe, Edward P. Dunne, and Henry M. Shepard. 1897. Sedgwick, A. G. An injunction symposium. Nation, Sept. SO, 1897, v. 65: 256-257. AP2.Kr2,v.66 1897. "Government by injimction" in America. Saturday review, Sept. 25, 1897, v. 84: 335. AP4.S3,v.84 1897. Hargis, Thomas F. Government by injunction. American federationist, Dec, 1897, v. 4: 227-228. HD8065.A5A2,v.4 38 LIBEAEY OF CONGRESS 1897. Dean, Ben S. Government by injunction. Oreen lag, Dec, 1897, v. 9: 6^0-5U. 1897. Peterkin, W. G. Government by injunction. Virginia law register, Dec., 1897, v. 3: 6^-663. 1898. Injunctions against boycotts: injunction against allowing a city council to readvertise a bid which it had refused to let to the lowest bidder at the dictation of labor leaders. American law review, Jan.-Feb., 1898, v. 32: 117-119. 1898. Injunctions against boycotting; labor association interfering with the business and freedom of action of third persons. American law review, Jan.-Feb., 1898, v. 32: 124.-127. 1898. Edwards, Percy L. Government by injunction. Albany law journal, Jan., 1898, v. 57: 8-12. 1898. Lewis, WUliam Draper. Strikes and coiirts of equity. American law register, Jan., 1898, v. Ifi: 1-12. References: pp. 1-2. 1898. Peterkin, William G. Government by injunction. American lawyer, Jan., 1898, v. 6: 5-8. A paper read at the twelfth annual meeting of the West Virginia bar association. 1898. Patteson, S. S. P. Government by injunction. Virginia law register, Jan., 1898, v. 3: 625-835. 1898. Stimson, Frederic J. The true attitude of courts and legis- latures upon labor questions. Green bag. Mar., 1898, v. 10: 103-107. 1898. Gregory, Charles Noble. Government by injunction. Harvard law review. Mar. 25, 1898, v. 11: 487-511. 1898. Stillman, James W. The misuse of injunctions. Arena, Aug., 1898, v. 20: 194-206. AP2.A6,v.30 1898. The injunction against the striking laborers of the American steel and wire company. American law review, Nov. -Dec, 1898, v. 32: 894-896. 1898. Gompers, Samuel. Injunctions and strikes. [Editorial]. American federationist, Nov., 1898, v. 5: 183-184- HD8055.A5A2,v.5 1899. Yarros, Victor. Labor and "government by injunction.' American federationist, Feb., 1899, v. 5: 231-233. HD8055.A5A2,v.6 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 39 1899. Gompers, Samuel. The boycott as a legitimate weapon. [Editorial]. American federationist, Oct., 1899, v. 6: 192-195. HD8055.A5A2,v.6 1899. Thompson, Seymour D. Injunction against boycotting. Amsrican law review, Nov.-Dec, 1899, v. 33: 885-888. 1900. Tandy, Francis D. Strikes, trusts, boycotts, and blacklists. AreiM, Feb., 1900., v. 23: 194-203. AP2.A6,v.23 1900. Thompson, Seymour D. Injunctions against boycotting. American law review, Mar.-Apr., 1900, v. 34: 161-185. 1900. Gompers, Samuel. The right of picketing. [Editorial]. American federationist, Mar., 1900, v. 7: 68-69. HD8055.A5A2,v.7 1900. Morancy, Frank W. Injunctions against boycotting. American law review, May- June, 1900, v. 34: 468-469. 1900. Gompers, Samuel. The right of picketing. [Editorial]. American federationist. May, 1900, v. 7: 136-147. HD8055.A5A2,v.7 1900. Gompers, Samuel. Judge Freedman's notorious injunction. [Editorial]. American federationist, June, 1900, v. 7: 162-164. HD8055.A5A2,v.7 1900. Gompers, Samuel. The happiness not to know. [Editorial]. American federationist, July, 1900, v. 7: 212-214- On injunctions against "picketing"; reply to an article by Ambrose Bierce in the New York journal for June 3, 1900. HD8055.A5A2,v.7 1900. Right of picketing judicially sustained. American federationist, Aug., 1900, v. 7: 240-242. HD8055.A5A2,v.7 1900. Gompers, Samuel. English hostility to injunctions. [Edi- torial]. American federationist, Nov., 1900, v. 7: 350-351. HD8055.A5A2,v.7 1901. Gompers, Samuel. Conflicting decisions on labor's rights. [Editorial]. American federationist. Mar., 1901, v. 8: 80-82. HD8055.A5A2,v.8 40 LIBBAKY OP CONGKESS 1901. Gompers, Samuel. Injunctions to prevent strikes. [Edi- torial]. American federationist, May, 1901, v. 8: 164-166. HD8055.A5A3,v.8 1901. Gompers, Samuel. More abuse of the injimction. [Editorial.]. American federationist, June, 1901, v. 8: 216-218. HD8055.A6A2,v.8 1901. Wilson, W. B. The blanket injunction. American federationist, Sept., 1901, v. 8: 340-341- Hr>8055.A5A2,v.8 1901. Gompers, Samuel. Rights achieved must be maiutained. Judicial usurpation of legislative functions. It even nau- seates the press. [Editorials]. American federationist, Sept., 1901, v. 8: 359-360. On "the recent injunction epidemic." HD8055.A5A2,v.8 1901. Gompers, Samuel. The right of "persuasion." [Editorial]. American federationist, Nov., 1901, v. 8: 474-473. HD8055.A5A2,v.8 1902. Gompers, Samuel. A worthy judicial exception. [Editorial]. American federationist. Mar., 1902, v. 9: 123-124. Favorable comment on a court decision in an injunction case in Chicago. HD8055.A5A2,v.9 1902. Gompers, Samuel. Anti-iaj unction legislation. [Editorial]. American federationist, Apr., 1902, v. 9: 180-181. HD8055.A5A2,v.9 1902. Gompers, Samuel. Conflicting judicial decisions. [Editorial]. American federationist, May, 1902, v. 9: 234-236. HD8055.A5A2,v.9 1902. Gompers, Samuel. Injunctions can't restrain free speech. [Editorial]. American federationist, June, 1902, v. 9: 299-301. HD8055.A5A2,v.9 1902. Gompers, Samuel. Cincinnati brewery bosses enjoin A. F. of L. [Editorial]. American federationist, June, 1902, v. 9: 302-304. HD8055.A5A2,v.9 1902. Protest against injunction abuse. American federationist, June, 1902, v. 9: 305-306. Address by the executive council, American federation of labor, to the wage workers of America. HD8055.A5A2,v.9 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 41 1902. Gompers, Samuel. An "anti," changed to a "pro"-injunc- tion bill. [Editorial]. American federationist, July, 1902, v. 9: S70-S72. On bill H. R. 11060, 57th Congress, Ist session. HD8066.A6A2,v.9 1902. The misuse of injunctions. Gunton's magazine, Sept., 1902, v. 23: 226-233. hi.G9,v.23 1902. Post, Louis F. The abuse of injunctions. American federationist, Oct., 1902, v. 9r 685-687. HD8055.A5A2,v.g 1902. Flower, B. O. Promoters of anarchy and social disorder. Arena, Oct., 1902, v. 28: 424-428. AP3.A6,v.28 On injunctions against strikes. 1902. Gompers, Samuel. The A. F. of L. and the "boycott." [Editorial]. American federationist, Nov., 1902, v. 9: 808-810. HD8055.A5A2,v.O 1903. Notes of recent decisions. Injunctions against intimidation. American law review, Jan.-Feh., 1903, v. 37: 148-149. 1903. Notes of recent decisions. Injunction against persuading railway employes to strike. American law review. Mar. -Apr., 1903, v. 37: 285-289. Discussion of an injunction issued by Judge Adams of the United States circuit court at St. Louis against the officers of the Brother- hood of railway trainmen and the Brotherhood of locomotive fire- men. 1903. Haldane, R. B. The labourer and the law. Contemporary review, Mar., 1903, v. S3: 362-372. AP4.C7,v.33 1903. Miller, James A. The courts on organized labor. Iron age. Mar. 5, 1903, v. 71: 19-22. Tl.l7,v.71 "Reprint from volume II, No. 1, Bulletin Corporations auxiliary company, Cleveland." 1903. White, Henry. Remedies for the boycott. Nation, Mar. 19, 1903, v. 76: 222-223. AP3.N2,v.76 1903. The Waterbury injunction. Gunton's magazine, Apr., 1903, v. 24: 283-288. hi.G9,v.24 1903. Labor injunctions. Gunton's magazine, Apr., 1903, v. 24: 348-351. hi.G9,v.24 42 LIBEAEY OF CONGEESS 1903. Steffee, John G. The Taflf Vale case. American law review, May- June, 1903, v. 37: S8S-S94- 1903. Notes of recent decisions. Injunction against persuading railway employes to strike: dissolution of injunction by Judge Adams. American law review. May- June, 1903, v. 37: Ii.61-Ji.62. 1903. Gompers, Samuel. New judicial usurpation through injunc- tions. [Editorial]. American federationist. May, 1903, v. 10: 362-364. HD8055.A5A2,v.lO 1903. Wyman, Bruce. The law as to the boycott. Green lag. May, 1903, v. 15: 208-215. 1903. Seabury, Samuel. The abuses of injunction. Arena, June, 1903, v. 29: 561-567. AP2.A6,v.29 1903. Crosby, Ernest H. The abuses of injunctions. Arena, July, 1903, v. SO: 48-51. AP2.A6,v.30 1903. Davenport, Daniel. The anti-boycott movement. Iron age, July 16, 1903, v. 72: 2. Tl.l7,v.72 1903. Davenport, Daniel. The boycott and how it can be de- stroyed. Iron age, July 23, 1903, v. 72: 54-65. Tll7,v.72 1903. Gompers, Samuel. A damage suit or prosecution to scare or intimidate us — ^well! [Editorial]. American federationist, Oct., 1903, v. 10: 1038-1039. A defense of boycotting as practiced by the American federation of labor. HD8055.A5A2,v.lO 1903. Gompers, Samuel. Some more judge-made law and labor. [Editorial]. American federationist, Oct., 1903, v. 10: 1039-1042. HD8055.A5A2,v.lO 1903. The legal status of the boycott. Iron age, Oct. 1, 1903, v. 72: 22-23. T117,v.72 1903. Notes of recent decisions. Injunction to protect labor unions. American law review, Nov.-Dec, 1903, v. 37: 932-934. Comment on the decision of the United States circuit court at St. Louis in the case of Boyer vs. the Western union telegraph com- pany. injunctions: periodicals 43 1904. Kleeberg, August. Ein Beitrag zur Revision der Begriffe Strike, Lockout und Boycott. Jahrbuchfur Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und VolkswirtscJiaft, 1904, v. 28: 105S-1090. H5J2,v.28 Bibliographical foot-notea. 1904. Gompers, Samuel. Invading labor's rights. [Editorial]. American federationist, Feb., 1904, ^- l^-' 129-130. A defense of the use of the boycott by labor organizations. HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 1904. Darling, Charles R. The law of strikes and boycotts. American law register, Feb., 1904, '"■ 52: 73-117. 1904. Gompers, Samuel. Misrepresenting the anti-injunction bill. [Editorial]. American federationist, Mar., 1904, '*^- H'- .218-220. HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 1904. Bayne, Howard R. To prevent injunctions in trade-union disputes. Railroad gazette. Mar. 18, 1904, v. 36: 212-213. TFl.B2,v.36 1904. ' President Gompers' argument on anti-injunction bill, H. R. 89, before Committee on judiciary, House of Representa- tives, Feb. 8, 1904. American federationist, Apr., 1904, v. 11, 309-312. KD8055.A5A2,v.ll 1904. Restraining injunctions. Gunton's magazine, Apr., 1904, v. 26: 291-299. hi.G9,v.26 1904. Rooker, William Velpau. A thesis on injvmctions. American federationist, May, 1904, v. 11: 381-385. HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 1904. Fxiruseth, Andrew. The essence of injunctions. American federationist. May, 1904, v. 11: 386-391. Argument in favor of the anti-injunction bill delivered before the Committee on labor of the House of Representatives, Mar. 24, 1904. HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 1904. Gompers, Samuel. The injimction mania. [Editorial]. American federationist, May, 1904, v. 11: 397-399. HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 1904. Livernash, Edward J. Why injimctions shoidd not apply. American federationist, July, 1904, v. 11: 602. Addressed to the Committee on the judiciary of the House of Rep- resentatives. HD8055.A5A2,v.ll 44 LIBBAEY OF CONGEESS 1904. Edwards, P. L. Labor strikes and injunctions. Central law journal, July 8, 1904, v. 59: 23-28. 1904. Boycotting — injunction — strikes. American architect {International ed.), Aug. 27, 1904, ''}• ^5: 70-71. NAl.A32,v.85 Case of Gray et al. v. Building trades council, et al., Supreme court of Minnesota, 97 Northwestern reporter, p. 663. 1904. Torrey, James H. Labor and the law. American lawyer, Oct., 1904, '"■ i^- 427-430. "The boycott": pp. 427^28. 1905. Elm, Adolph von. Der Boykott als Waffe im wirtschaft- lichen Kampf. Sozialistische Monatshefte, Jan., 1905, v. 11: 37-43. HX6.S6,v.ll 1905. Gompers, Samuel. A just court decision. [Editorial]. American federationist, Feb., 1905, v. 12: 76-78. HD8055.A5A2,v.l2 1905. Tempering "government by injunction." Literary digest, Feb. 18, 1905, v. 30: 232-233. AP2.L58,v.30 1905. Gompers, Samuel. Some notions on injunction legislation. [Editorial]. American federationist. Mar., 1905, v. 12: I4I-I44. HD8055.A5A2,v.l2 1905. Clark, Lindley D. The present legal status of organized labor in the United States. Journal of 'political economy. Mar., 1905, v. IS: 173-200. HBl.J7,v.l3 Injunctions: pp. 180-199. 1905. Beveridge, W. H. The reform of trade union law. Economic review, April 15, 1905, v. 15: 129-149. HBl.E4,v.l5 1905. Heise, Stephan. Schhmmer als Streikbruch. Neue Zeit, May 27, 1905, v. 23: 290-292. HX6.N6,v.23 1905. Edwards, P. L. Labor strikes and injunctions. Albany law journal, July, 1905, v. 67: 209-214. 1905. Gompers, Samuel. Jenkins on injunctions and strikes. [Edi- torial]. American federationist, July, 1905, v. 12: 443-445. HD8066.A5A2,v.l2 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 45 1905. Gompers, Samuel. No property right in labor. [Editorial]. American federationist, Nov., 1906, v. 12: 836-836. HD8055.A5A2,T.ia 1906. Gompers, Samuel. Two courts on picketing. [Editorial]. American federationist, Jan., 1906, v. 13: 28-31. "The position taken is that picketing is an invasion of property rights and as such may — nay, should — be enjoined by courts of equity." HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 1906. Freund, Ernst. Recent Illinois decisions regarding injunc- tions in the course of strikes. Journal of 'political economy, Jan., 1906, v. 14-' 43-46. HBl.J7,v.l4 1906. Bryan, James Wallace. Injunctions against strikes. American law review, Jan.-Feb., 1906, v. 40: 4^-67. 1906. Gompers, Samuel. Developments ia injunction fight. [Edi- torial]. American federationist, Feb., 1906, v. 13: 89-92. HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 1906. Bryan, James Wallace. Injunctions agaiast boycotts and similar unlawful acts. American law review, Mar.-Apr., 1906, v. 40: 196-211. 1906. Gompers, Samuel. Judge Holdom's iajtinction frenzy. [Edi- torial]. American federationist. Mar., 1906, v. 13: 156-168. HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 1906. Ashley, W. J. Trade unions and the law. National review. Mar., 1906, v. 47: 56-67. AP4.N25,v.47 An examination of the purport of recent judicial decisions in regard to trade unions. Finds evidence that "our judges [English] are now seeking to set limits to the combination of labor." 1906. Gompers, Samuel. The injunction in labor disputes must go. American federationist, Apr., 1906, v. IS: 228-230. HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 1906. Furuseth, Andrew. No property rights in man: the essen- tial principle of protest against injunctions in labor disputes. .American federationist. May, 1906, v. 13: 310-316. HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 "Argument, before Judiciary committee on anti-injunction bill, • - . -«fef; U,-.*§06." 46 LIBKAEY OF CONGKESS 1906. Gompers, Samuel. Labor legislation here and in England. [Editorial]. American federationist, May, 1906, v. 13: 320-322. HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 1906. Gompers, Samuel. A letter to President Roosevelt. American federationist, June, 1906, v. 13: 377-380. HD8055.A5A2,v.l3 In support of the Peaire anti-injunction bill (H. R. 18752). 1906. Joel, J. Edmondson. Trade disputes and the law of molesta- tion and conspiracy. Westminster review, June, 1906, v. 166: 605-615. AP4.W5,v.l65 1906. Gompers, Samuel. Injunction extended. Where next? [Editorial]. American federationist, July, 1906, v. IS: Ifi7-Jf.69. HD&055.A5A2,v.l3 1906. Die Rechtsprechung gegenuber den gewerkschaftlichen Boy- kottkampfen und Verrufserklarungen. Soziale Praxis, Aug. 23, 1906, v..l5: 1221-1223. H5.S7,v.l5 1906. Gompers, Samuel. A fair injunction decision — ^labor aims to make it the law of the land. [Editorial]. American federationist, Oct., 1906, v. 13: 816-818. HD8055.A5'A2,v.13 1906. Edwards, Clement. The government trade disputes bill. Nineteenth century and after, Oct., 1906, v. 60: 587-59^. AP4.N7,v.60 Criticises the clause of the bill entitled "Prohibition of actions of tort against trade unions." Argues that injunctions should be prohibited. "The injunction is used early in the fray. In a properly laid case upon a carefully drawn series of affidavits a union may find itself prohibited by injunction from providing the sinews of war to carry on a strike perfectly lawful in itself, but in connection with which certain unlawful acta may have been committed by individuals, over whom they have no control. An injunction under such cir- cumstances may cause the collapse of a strike, with the result that the men, angry at such a collapse, will leave the union in large numbers. This has been the experience in American strikes over and over again. There the injunction in a strike has been devel- oped as a weapon of great art and power. And unless it is pro- hibited against the unions here, it needs no wisdom to predict that its far-reaching possibilities will be exploited to the utmost under the pressiu-e of the feelings engendered by, and the great interests often involved in, our great industrial conflicts." BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 47 1906. Freund, Ernst. On the legality of a boycott in Germany. Journal of political economy, Nov., 1906, v. 14: 573-574- HBl.J7,v.l4 1906. Grant, Luke. Effects of labor injunctions. Times magazine, Dec, 1906, v. 1: 68-72. AI'2.T48,v.l 1907. Gompers, Samuel. Judicial perrersion of law against labor. [Editorial]. American federationist, Jan., 1907, v. 14: 36-38. A diflciission of certain court decisions in which sympathetic strikes were held to be boycotts. HD8065.A5A2,v.l4 1907. littlefield, Charles E. Most revolutionary of all class labor propositions, and the hottest of all campaigns over it. American industries, Jan. 1, 1907, v. 5: I-4. HD4802.A6,v.5 1907. Allen, Andrew J. Anti-injunction legislation. Open shop. Mar., 1907, v. 6: 140-144- HD6500.O5,v.6 1907. Gompers, Samuel. Congressional juggling and sophistry with the injunction issue. [Editorial]. American federationist, Apr., 1907, v. I4: 256-258. HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 1907. McWilhams, Kobert L. Evolution of the law relating to boycotts. American law review, May-June, 1907, v. 4I: 336-342. National corporation reporter, Nov. 28, 1907, v. 35: 490-491. 1907. Labor litigation — strikes and boycotts — aright to a "free market." American law review, May-June, 1907, v. 4I: 44^-451. 1907. SpeUing, T. C. "The point" in injunctions. Abuse of the injunction process in its appUcation to personal as well as to property rights. American federationist, June, 1907, v. I4: 401-407. HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 1907. Huebner, Grover G. Definitions, laws and judicial decisions regarding boycotting. Government, June, 1907, v. 1: 36-47. Hl.G7,v.l 1907. Gompers, Samuel. Van Cleave seeks injunction against A. F. of L. [Editorial]. American federationist, Oct., 19Cn^, v. I4: 784-786. Case of the boycott against the Buck's stove and range company of St. Louis. HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 67382°— 11 4 48 LIBEAEY OF CONGEESS 1907. Gompers, Samuel. Taft, the injunction standard-bearer. [Editorial]. American federationist, Oct., 1907. v. 14: 785-790. HD8055.A6A2,v.l4 1907. Gompers, Samuel. Federal injunctions jolted — ^labor's con"- tention justified. [Editorial]. American federationist, Oct., 1907, v. 1^: 790-791. Comment on the use of the injunction by federal courts in railroad rate cases in certain southern states. HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 1907. Van Cleave, James W. The boycott and the blacklist. American industries, Oct. 15, 1907, v. 6: 12-14- » HD4802.A6,v.6 1907. Gompers, Samuel. Taft, the injimction candidate. [Edi- torial]. American federationist, Nov., 1907, v. 14: 872-875. HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 1907. Gompers, Samuel. Is the boycott un-American ? [Editorial]. American federationist, Nov., 1907, v. 14: 875-880. HD8055.A5A2,v.l4 1907. Labor's attitude toward the writ of injunction. Charities and The Commons, Nov. 2, 1907, v. 19: 1016. HVl.C4,v.l9 1907. The boycott by labor declared illegal : Justice Gould's decision summarized. American industries, Dec. 15, 1907, v. 6: 22-23. HD4802.A6,v.6 1907. Seager, Henry R. The legal status of trade imions in the United Kingdom, with conclusions applicable to the United States. Political science quarterly, Dec, 1907, v. 22: 611-629. HlP8,v.22 1908. Justice Gould's decision on the boycott. Albany law journal, Jan., 1908, v. 70: 8-13. 1908. Justice Gould's decision on the boycott. American industries, Jan. 1, 1908, v. 6: 6-9. Text in full. HD4802.A6,v.6 1908. Labor's responsibility in the boycott. American industries, Jan. 15, 1908, v. 6: 5-6. HD4802.A6,v. 6 js'ij:'!f«!U!TTS AND injunctions: periodicals 49 1908. Gompers, Samuel. Free press and free speech invaded by • injunction against the A. F. of L. — a review and protest [Editorial]. American federationist, Feb., 1908, v. 15: 98-105. HD8055.A5Aa,v.l5 1908. Gould, Ashley M. Order granting injunction. Buck's stove and range co. vs. American federation of labor. American federationist, Feb., 1908, v. 15: 114-115. HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 1908. Injunction in labor cases: from an argument by James M. Beck before the Senate Judiciary committee. American industries, Feb. 15, 1908, v. 7: 20. HD4802.A6,v.7 1908. Kennedy, John C. An important labor injunction. Journal of political economy, Feb., 1908, v. 16: 102-105. HBl.J7,v.l6 Decision of Judge Gould, enjoining the American federation of labor from further boycotting the Buck's stove and range company, of St. Louis. 1908. Darling, Charles R. Recent American decisions and English legislation affecting labor unions. American law review, Mar.-Afr., 1908, v. 42: 200-228. 1908. Supreme court decision in the hatters' case. Affects all or- ganized labor — a symposium giving opinion and comment by men of affairs. American federationist. Mar., 1908, v. 15: 161—178. HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 1908. Gompers, Samuel. Labor organizations must not be out- lawed — the Supreme court's decision in the hatters' case. [Editorial]. » American federationist, Mar., 1908, v. 15: 18t§kl92. HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 1908. Supreme court decision. Dietrich Loewe et al. vs. Martin Lawlor et al. Feb. 3, 1908. American federationist, Mar., 1908, v. 15: 195-199. Text of the decision. HD8065.A5A2,v.l6 1908. Injunctions. By a member of the New Jersey bar. Exponent, St. Louis, Mar., 1908, v. 6: IS-I4. HD6500.E8,v.5 "A clear analysis of the principles of injunction law." 50 LIBBAKY OF CONGEESS 1908. The boycott perpetually enjoined. Justice Clabaugh's deci- sion. American industries, Afr. 1, 1908, v. 7: 17. Text of the deciaion. HD4802.A6,v.7 1908. Littlefield, Charles E. "Class legislation." Exponent, St. Louis, Apr., 1908, v. 5: 6-9, 15. HD6500.E8,v.5 A discussion chiefly of the subject of injunctions in labor disputes. 1908. Amend the Sherman anti-trust law — labor must exercise its political power. A symposium by men of affairs. American federationist. May, 1908, v. 15: 354-364- HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 1908. Gompers, Samuel. Labor and the anti-trust law. [Editorial]. American federationist. May, 1908, v. 15: 366-388. HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 1908. Speer, William H. Anti-injunction legislation. American industries, Junel, 1908, v. 7: 12-13. HD4802.A6,v.7 1908. Leipart, Theodor. Der Boykott als gewerkschaftliches Kampfmittel. Sozialistische Monatshefte, June, 1908, v. 14: 724-729. HX6.S6,v.l4 1908. Mahon, John. Labor and the judiciary. American law review, July-Aug., 1908, v. 42: 598-601. 1908. Silverstein, David. Injunctions in labor cases. American federationist, July, 1908, v. 15: 517-519. HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 1908. Gompers, Samuel. Judge upholds labor's injunction conten- tion. [Editorial]. Amerimn federationist, July, 1908, v. 15: 529-531. jJlHl HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 1908. Amendment to Sherman law. Argument presented by Presi- dent Samuel Gompers, of the A. F. of L., before Judiciary committee of the House, April 6, 1908, on amendment to the Sherman anti-trust law. American federationist, July, 1908, v. IS: 538-541- HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 1908. Mine workers on injunctions. American federationist, July, 1908, v. 15: 54^-543. Resolutions adopted by United mine workers of America. HD8055.A5A3,v.l5 D INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 51 1908. Littlefield, Charles E. The President and the courts. An„encan industries, July 1, 1908, v. 7: 11-1 4. HD4802.A6,v.7 1908. Emery, James A. The truth about injunctions. American industries, July 15, 1908, v. 7: 26-26. HD4802.A6,v.7 "A review of the records bearing on the question of alleged abuses of the power of injunction." 1908. Gompers, Samuel. Both parties have spoken — choose be- tween them. [Editorial]. American federationist, Aug., 1908, v. 15: 698-606. KD8065.A5A2,v.l5 On the injunction planks in the platforms of the Republican and Democratic parties. 1908. Grompers, Samuel. The essence of labor's contention on injunctions. [Editorial]. American federationist, Aug., 1908, v. 16: 611-613. HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 1908. Burdick, Francis M. Injunctions in labor disputes. North American review, Aug., 1908, v. 188: 273-284. AP2.N7,v.l88 1908. Concerning injunctions. OutlooTc, Aug. 8, 1908, v. 89: 786-789. ap2.08,v.89 1908. Dwight, Frederick. The origin and use of injunctions. Independent, Aug. IS, 1908, v. 65: 348-351. AP2.l53,v.65 1908. Trieber, Jacob. Injunctions and the judiciary. Independent, Aug. 13, 1908, v. 65: 352-364- AP2.l53,v.65 1908. Gompers, Samuel. The abuse of iaj unctions. Independent, Aug. 27, 1908, v. 65: 460-463. AP2.I53,v.65 1908. Trickett, W. The rationale of the injunction. American law review, Sept.-Oct., 1908, v. 42: 687-705. 1908. Brown, Arthur March. Labor questions in the courts of Massachusetts. American law review, Sept.-Oct., 1908, v. 42: 706-734- 1908. Petition of Buck's stove and range co. to the Supreme court of the District of Columbia for an order against Samuel Gompers, Frank Morrison, and John Mitchell, "to show cause" why they should not be punished for the court's in- junction of Dec. 18, 1907. American federationist, Sept., 1908, v. 15: 674, 678, 680, 682, 684, 686, 688, 690, 692. HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 52 LIBKAEY OF CONGRESS 1908. Gompers, Samuel. The cry for more (in)equity. American federationist, Sept., 1908, v. 15: 740-743. HD8065.A5AS,v.l5 1908. Alger, George W. Taft and labor. McOlure's magazine, Sept., 1908, v. 31: 597-602. AP2.M2,v.31 1908. White, Henry. The labor unions in the presidential cam- paign. NoHh American review, Sept., 1908, v. 188: 372-382. AP2.N7,v.l88 1908. Groat, George Gorham. The courts' view of injunction in labor disputes. Political science quarterly, Sept., 1908, v. 23: 408-4^9, Hl.P8,v.23 1908. Gompers, Samuel. Injunction contempt proceedings. American Jederationist, Oct., 1908, v. 15: 852-858. HI>8055.A5A2,v.l5 1908. Low, Seth. The writ of injunction as a party issue. A com- parison of the Republican and Democratic platforms in their treatment of the labor question. Century magazine, Oct., 1908, v. 76: 911-916. AP2.C4,v.76 1908. Chandler, William E. The labor union, the injunction, and the trust. Collier's, Oct. 10, 1908, v. 42: 24. ap2.C65,v.42 1908. Hendrick, Burton J. The battle against the Sherman law. How capital and labor combine to safeguard the trust and legalize the boycott. McOlure's magazine, Oct., 1908, v. 31: 665-680. AP2.M2,v.31 1908. Hourwich, Isaac A. Injunctions. Moody's magazine, Oct., 1908, v. 6: 270-273. HGl.M85,v.6 1908. Lewis, Henry Harrison. The peril of anti-injunction legisla- tion. North American review, Oct., 1908, v. 188: 577-583. AP2.N7,v.l88 1908. Baldwin, E. F. Government by injunction. American Jederationist, Nov., 1908, v. 15: 953-955. HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 1908. Gompers, Samuel. President Roosevelt's attack on labor answered. [Editorial]. American federationist, Nov., 1908, v. 15: 973-980. HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 53 1908. Stevens, Frederick W. Proper use of the writ of injunction — from the standpoint of legal history. Columbia law review, Nov., 1908, v. 8: 561-566. Reprinted in Virginia law register, Dec, 1908, v. 14, pp. 577-583; and in New Jersey law journal, Dec, 1908, v. 31, pp. 357-359. 1908. Turner, George Kibbe. What organized labor wants. An interview with Samuel Gompers. McGlure's magazine, Nov., 1908, v. 32: 25-31. ap2.M2,v.32 Reprinted in part in American federationist, Dec, 1908, v. 16, pp. 1057-1063. HD8055.A5A2,v.l5 A statement of Mr. Gompers' position in regard to injunctions, boy- cotts, etc. 1908. Wissell, Rudolf. Schadenersatzanspriiche aus Boykott und Sperren. Neue Zeit, Dec. 11, 18, 1908, v. 27: 4O6-4IS, 437-443. HX6.N6,v.27 1909. Judge [Alton B.] Parker's argument. In connection with the Buck's stove and range company's contempt proceedings. American Jedefationist, Jan., 1909, v. 16: 17-30. HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 1909. Gompers, Samuel. President Roosevelt's message on labor. [Editorial]. American jederationist, Jan., 1909, v. 16: 40-47. HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 Relates principally to the President's attitude on the injunction question. 1909. The contempt decision of Justice Wright. American industries, Jan. 1, 1909, v. 8: 8-18. HD4802.A6,v.8 Text of the decision in the case of Buck's stove and range company vs. American federation of labor. 1909. History of the Buck's stove and range company boycott case. American industries, Jan. 1, 1909, v. 8: 23-33. HD4802.A6,v.8 1909. Taylor, Graham. From the judges to the law makers. Charities and The Commons, Jan. 16, 1909, v. 21: 693-694. HVl.C4,v.21 1909. Cook, E. Wake. King Boycott : a new potentate. East and West, Jan., 1909, v. 8: 53-66. AP8.E2,v.8 1909. Portenar, A. J. Nemo me impune lacessit. Independent, Jan. 28, 1909, v. 66: 182-185. AP2.l53,v.66 54 LIBBABY OF CONGEESS 1909. Injunction law: boycotts: labor unions. National corporation reporter, Jan. 21, 28, 1909, v. 37: 710- 715, 746-750. "The Buck stove and range co. v. The American federation of labor, et al." 1909. The conviction of labor leaders: the principles involved. OuilooTc, Jan. 2, 1909, v. 91: 3-6. AP3.08,v.91 1909. Justice Wright's decision. American federationist, Feb., 1909, v. 16: 101-128. HD8055.A5.A2,v.l6 In the case of the Buck's stove and range company vs. the American federation of labor, et al. 1909. Gompers, Samuel. Justice Wright's denial of free speech and free press. [Editorial]. American jederationist, Feb., 1909, v. 16: 130-132. HD8055.A5.A2,v.l6 1909. Famous boycott case. American review oj reviews, Feb., 1909, v. 39: 145-146. AP2.B,4,v.39 1909. The "unfair list" and the freedom of the press. Chicago legal news, Feb. 20, 1909, v. 41: 233. 1909. The contempt of Samuel Gompers; labor unions ablaze; the boycott and the blacklist. Current literature, Feb., 1909, v. 46: 127-132. AP2.C95,v.46 1909. Speer, William H. Recent labor decisions. Exponent, St. Louis, Feb., 1909, v. 6: 6-8. HD6500.E8,v.6 An address delivered before the Citizens' industrial association of St. Louis, Jan. 19, 1909. 1909. Hale, Richard W. Injunctions and pardons. 7n re Gompers. American law review, Mar.-Apr., 1909, v. 43: 192-204. 1909. Gompers, Samuel. [Editorial comment on Justice Wright's decision]. American federationist. Mar., 1909, v. 16: 216-229. HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 1909. Right to restrain the right of free speech or a free press when necessary to make effective the terms of an injunction restraining a boycott. Central law journal. Mar. 19, 1909, v. 68: 207-208. BOYCOTTS AND INJUKCTIONS: PERIODICALS 55 1909. Martin, John. Labor unions and the boycott. Gharities and The Commons, Mar. 6, 1909, v. 21: IO46-IO48. HVl.C4,v.21 1909. Schaffner, Margaret A. Injunctions in labor disputes. Gharities and The Commons, Mar. 21, 1909, v. 21: 1236. HVl.C4,v.21 1909. Court of appeals of the District of Columbia. No. 1916. De- cided Mar. 11, 1909. The American federation of labor et al., appellants, v. the Buck's stove and range com- pany. Chicago legal news. Mar. 20, 1909, v. 4I: 265-268, 270-272. Text of court deciflion. 1909. Thomasj David Y. A year of bench labor law. Political science quarterly. Mar., 1909, v. 24: 8O-94. Hl.P8,v.24 1909. Court of appeals of the District of Columbia. The American federation of labor et al., appellants, v. the Buck's stove and range company. Decided March 11, 1909. American federationist, A'pr., 1909, v. 16: 313-335, HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 1909. Gompers, Samuel. Buck's stove and range company injunc- tion modified. [Editorial]. American federationist, Apr., 1909, v. 16: 336-345. HD8056.A5A2,v.l6 1909. MacDonald, Edward A. The right of a trade union to enforce a boycott. Michigan law review, Apr., 1909, v. 7: 499-502. 1909. Gompers, Samuel. Justice Wright's decision and sentence in the Gompers, Mitchell, and Morrison case. [Editorial]. The appeal and Judge Parker's magnificent argument. American federationist. May, 1909, v. 16: 438-456. HX>8055.A5A2,v.l6 Includes extended extracts from the argument of the attorney for the defendants. 1909. Abridging freedom of speech or of press by injunction. Law notes. May, 1909, v. 13: 21-22. 1909. Is the "black list" unlawful? Law notes, May, 1909, v. 13: 22-23. 56 LIBEAEY OP CONGRESS 1909. Veeder, Van Vechten. Absolute immunity in defamation: judicial proceedings. Columbia law review, June, 1909, v. 9: 463-491. 1909. Taft, William Howard. Judicial decisions as an issue in politics. McClure's rnagazine, June, 1909, v. 33: 201-209. AP2.M3,v.33 1909. Bope, George W. Wrongs to be righted. American federationist, July, 1909, v. 16: 593-596. HD8055.A5A3,v.l6 Chiefly on the question of injunctions in labor disputes. 1909. Lennon, John B. Unjust injunctions work for personal free- dom. [Editorial]. American federationist, Aug., 1909, v. 16: 671-672. HD8055.A5A3,v.l6 1909. Fauntleroy, Cornelius H. Government by injunction. Central law journal, Aug. 20, 1909, v. 69: 129-135. 1909. Drew, Walter. A legal discussion of the boycott. Square deal, Sept., 1909, v. 5: 100-108. HD6500.S7,v.6 1909. Earby, John, jr. Where does President Taft stand ? American industries, Oct., 1909, v. 10: 10-12. HD4802.A6,v.lO A criticism of the President's speech delivered at Chicago, Sept. 16, 1909, discussing labor unions, the question of injunctions, etc. 1909. Enjoining argument by persuasion to induce one to join a labor union. Central law journal, Oct. 29, 1909, v. 69: 315-816. 1909. The boycott and free speech. OutlooTc, Nov. 13, 20, 1909, v. 93: 562, 607-608. AP2.08,v.93 1909. Court of appeals of the District of Columbia. Samuel Gom- pers, Frank Morrison, and John Mitchell, appellants, v. the Buck's stove and range company, appellee. No. 1990. Decided Nov. 2, 1909. American federationist, Dec, 1909, v. 16: 1037-1059. HD8055.A5A2,v.l6 Text of the decision of the court. 1909. Boyle, James. Organized labor and court decisions. Forum, Dec, 1909, v. 42: 535-551. AP2.r8,v.42 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 57 1909. The Gompers-Mitchell-Morrison sentence affirmed. Court of appeals of the District of Columbia. Samuel Gompers, Frank Morrison, and John Mitchell, appellants, v. the Buck's stove and range company, appellee. Square deal, Dec, 1909, v. 5: 389-434- HD6500.S7,v.5 Text of the decision. 1910. Our test case in the U. S. Supreme court. Petition and brief [in the case of the Buck's stove and range company]. American federationist, Jan., 1910, v. 17: 17-32. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910. Gompers, Samuel. The President on injunctions. [Editorial]. American federationist, Jan., 1910, v. 17: 45-48- HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 Comment on the President's annual message to Congress. 1910. Bettman, Gilbert. Contempt procedure in equity. Am,erican federationist, Feb., 1910, v. 17: 116-118. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910. Primm, C. J. Labor miions and the anti-trust law: a review of decisions. Journal of 'political economy, Feb., 1910, v. 18: 129-138. HBl.J7,v.l8 1910. Illegal boycott: the Danbury hatters. OuUooTc, Feb. 19, 1910, v. 94: 370-371. AP2.08,v.94 1910. Union rule or ruin. Story of the Danbury boycott as told in court. Square deal, Feb., 1910, v. 6: 38-48. HD6500.S7,v.6 From the New York Sun. 1910. Gompers, Samuel. The hatters' case. The Sherman law — amend it or end it. American federationist. Mar. 1910, v. 17: 197-204. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910. Bennett, A. W. Unions may boycott; so the court decides in the case of the first injunction in a labor dispute in the new state of Oklahoma. American federationist, Mar., 1910, v. 17: 228-230. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910. Emery, James A. The administration injunction bill. American industries, Mar., 1910, v. 10: 28-29. 58 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 1910. Merritt, Walter Gordon. The significance of the Loewe decision. American industries, 1910, Mar., v. 10: 22-2S; Apr., v. 10: 25-27; May, v. 10: 28-29, Jfi. HD4802.A6,v.lO Reprinted in Square deal, Apr.-June, 1910, v. 6, pp. 227-231, 353- 359, 433^37. 1910. Gompers, Samuel. Judicial invasion of guaranteed rights. American federationist, Apr., 1910, v. 17: 297-301. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910, Gompers, Samuel. A protest against legalizing the injunc- tion abuse. American federationist, Apr., 1910, v. 17: 318-320. HD8055.A6A3,v.l7 1910. Civic federation on black and white lists. Survey, Apr. 10, 1910, v. 22: 88-89. HVl.C4,v.22 1910. CaldweU, Henry Clay. Trial by judge and jury. American federationist. May, 1910, v. 17: 385-399. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910. Bottger, Hugo. Der Boykott. Preussische Jahrbuclier, June, 1910, v. IJfi: 444-4^9. AP30.P8,v.l40 1910. Emery, James A. Injunctions practically considered. Square deal, June, 1910, v. 6: 385-394- HD6500.S7,v.6 Reprinted from Annals of the American academy of political and social science, v. 36, no. 1. 1910. Gompers, Samuel. Injunctions: human rights and property rights confused. [Editorial]. American federationist, July, 1910, v. 17: 590-593. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910. The Buck's stove and range case. The proof of conspiracy as given in Justice Wright's decision (no. 27305, equity. Dis- trict of Columbia, Dec. 23, 1908.) American industries, Aug., 1910, v. 11: 5-8. HD4802.A6,v.ll Reprinted in Square deal, Sept., 1910, v. 7, pp. 108-116. 1910. Gompers, Samuel. Free speech and the injunction order. American academy of political and social scien<;e. Annals, Sept., 1910, V. -36: 255-264. Hl.A4,v.36 1910. Merritt, Walter G. Law of the Danbury hatters' case. American academy of political and social science. Annals, Sept., 1910, V. 36: 265-276. H1.A4 v.36 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PERIODICALS 59 1910. Schaflfner, Margaret A. Effect of the recent boycott de- cisions. American academy of political and social science. Annals, Sept., 1910, V. 36: 277-287. Hl.A4,v.36 1910. Bryan, James Wallace. Proper bounds of the use of the injunction in labor disputes. American academy of political and social science. Annals, Sept., 1910, V. 36: 288-301. Hl.A4,v.36 1910. Gompers, Samuel. Buck's stove and range company's agree- ment with organized labor. [Editorial]. American federationist, Sept., 1910, v. 17: 807-812. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910. Origin of the writ of injunction. Terrester. Central law journal, Sept. 9, 1910, v. 71: 168-172. 1910. Use and abuse of injimctions. Outlook, Sept., 3, 1910, v. 96: 14-17. AP3.08,v.96 1910. Frazier, Walter S. Injunctions. OutlooTc, Oct. 1, 1910, V. 96: 288-289. AP2.08,v.96 1910. Shepard, Almond G. Principles applicable in determining the lawfulness of a boycott by a labor union. American federationist, Nov., 1910, v. 17: 976-981. HD8055.A5A2,v.l7 1910. Interference by combinations of labor with employer's business. Columbia law review, Nov., 1910, v. 10: 652-654- 1910. The secondary boycott. [Editorial]. OutlooTc, Nov. 26, 1910, v. 96: 661. AP2.08,v.96 1911. Gompers, Samuel. A specimen of wobbly thinking. American federationist, Jan. 1911, v. 18: 29-31. Reply to an editorial in the Outlook, for Nov. 26, 1910, entitled "The secondary boycott." HD8055.A5A3,v.X8 1911. Gompers, Samuel. The President's habit of mind on injimc- tions. [Editorial]. American federationist, Jan., 1911, v. 18: 32-34- KD8056.A6A2,v.l8 ADDITIONAL REFERENCES Becker, Tracy C. Boycotting : is it criminal ? (In New York state bar association. Reports, 1887, v. 10, pp. 148 and following. Albany, 1887. 8°.) Debs, Eugene Victor. Debs: his life, writings and speeches, with a department of appreciations. Girard, Kan.: The Appeal to reason, 1908. (4), ii, (^), 515 pp. Frontispiece. Illustrated. Plates. Portraits. 8°. "Life of Eugene V. Debs, by Stephen Marion Reynolds": p. 1-76; "The federal government and the Chicago strike": pp. 181-205; "Growth of the injunction": pp. 313-318. 8—28429 Devine, Thomas H. Government by injunction. {In Colorado bar association. Report, 1905, pp. 187-204. [Denver, 1905]. 8°.) Littlefield, Charles E. The Sherman anti- trust law and the proposed amendments thereto. {In Illinois state bar association. Proceedings, 32d annual meeting, 1908, pp. 23-65. Springfield, 1908. 8°.) Also printed in Chicago legal news, July 4, 1908, v. 40, pp. 373-376, 378-379. Massachusetts. Committee on relations ietween employer and em- ployee. Report. Submitted in accordance with resolve approved June 5, 1903. Boston: Wright <& Potter printing co., state printers, 1904- 118 pp. 8°. "Blacklisting; intimidation; boycotts; injunction in labor disputes": pp. 56-72. Appendix no. 11. Liability in case of a boycott: pp. 103-104; App. no. 12. Correspondence concerning injunctions in Massachusetts: pp. 104-107; App. no. 13. An act to give trial by jury and appeal in certain cases of contempt of court: pp. 107-109; App. no. 15. Judicial opinions on industrial disputes. HD8053.ia:4A5 1804 11—1817 Stern, Samuel R. The law and the laborer. {In Washington state bar association. Proceedings, 1894, pp. 107-129. [n. p.], 1894. 8°.) Stoll, R. C. Power to enjoin organized interference with property. {In Kentucky bar association. Proceedings, 1907, pp. 196-226. Louisville, [1907]. 8°.) Swayne, Wager. The legal aspect of railroad strikes — the Ann Arbor decision. {In Compendium of transportation theories, pp. 121-128. Washing- ton, 1893. 8°.) HE1031.C73 Temple, M. L. How far are labor unions liable for the acts of their members. {In Iowa state bar association. Proceedings, 1904, pp. 48-57. Tipton, 1904. 8°.) 60 ARTICLES IN PERIODICALS 1897. Greenbaum, Milton D. The power of the United States courts to enjoin persons from obstructing interstate commerce and the transportation of the mails. Chicago legal news, 1897, Aug. 28, Sept. 4, 11, 18, 25, Oct. 2, V. SO: 2-3; 13-14; 27; 34; 39-40; 46-47. Reprinted from the Baltimore Daily record. 1907. Smith, Jeremiah. Crucial issues in labor Utigation. Harvard law review, Feb.-Apr., 1907, v. 20: 253-279; 345- 362; 429-455. 1907. Government by injunction in its various aspects. Eepre- sentatives of labor and of capital discuss the conflicting issues of the day. National civic federation review. Mar. -Apr., 1907, v. 2: 2-4. Discussion by August Belmont, Seth Low, T. C. Spelling, Walter Drew, and John Mitchell. HD4802.N2,v.2 1907. Meier, W. F. The attitude of equity toward the strike and boycott — use of the injunction. Law notes. May, 1907, v. 11: 27-31. 1907. Conspiracy — ^labor unions. Jetton-Dekle lumber co. v. Ma- ther. Supreme court of Florida, Feb. 26, 1907. Central law journal, Oct. 4, 1907, v. 65: 258-261. ' 'Labor unions as monopolies imposing illegal restraints upon trade and commerce [editorial note]": pp. 261-262. 1907. Donnell, F. C. Injunctions against strikes, boycotts and similar unlawful acts.. Central law journal, Oct. 11, 1907, v. 65: 273-282. 1908. Injunctions. PEditorial.] Green hag, Jan., 1908, v. 20: 34-35. 1908. The anti-trust act and the boycott. [Editorial]. Legal intelligencer, Feb. 7, 1908, v. 65: 88. 1908. Kegulation of contempt proceedings in injunction cases. C. C. M. Law notes. Mar., 1908, v. 11: 1908. Boycotting interstate commerce. Case and comment, Apr., 1908, v. 14-' 164-155. Editorial comment on the decision of the United States Supreme court in the case Loewe v. Lawler (28 Supreme court reports, 301). 61 62 LIBEABY OF CONGKESS 1908. Shall the anti-trust act be amended? Effort to amend the Sherman act — Shearings before the House Committee on the judiciary on the Civic federation's bill — the measure explained and defended. National civic federation review, May, 1908, v. 3: 1-5, 19-24- HD4802.N2,v.3 1908. Knowlton, Jerome C. Labor organizations in legislation. Michigan law review, June, 1908, v. 6: 609-628. Comment on the decisions of the United States Supreme court in the cases Howard v. Illinois Central railway (207 U. S., 463); Adair v. United States (208 U. S., 161); and Loewe v. Lawlor (208 U. S., 274). 1908. Boycott as combination in restraint of trade under the anti- trust act. [Editorial comment]. Yale law journal, June, 1908, v. 17: 616-618. 1908. Stevens, F. W. Judge Taft's decisions affecting labor organizations. Ohio law reporter, July, 27, 1908, v. 6: 2^7-262. Address delivered before the Kalamazoo County (Mich.) bar asso- ciation, June 30, 1908. 1908. A comparison of the "injunction planks" in the present party platforms. Bench and har, Sept., 1908, v. U: 83-89. 1908. Amendment of the anti-trust act. Further hearings before the House Committee on the judiciary on the Civic federa- tion's bill — the argument of the opposition — the Commis- sioner of corporations defends the general plan. National dvic federation review, Sept., 1908, v. 3: 2-4. HD4802.N2,v.3 1908. Dwight, F. The origin and use of injunctions. New Jersey law journal, Sept., 1908, v. 31: 261-265. 1908. Trieber, Jacob. Injunctions and the judiciary. New Jersey law journal, Sept., 1908, v. 31: 266-269. 1909. Littlefield, Charles E. Legislative invasion of judicial power. Brief (Phi delta phi quarterly), Jan., 1909, v. 8: 221-247. Part of a speech upon the general subject of injunctions, delivered in the House of Representatives on May 30, 1908. 1909. Low, Seth. The contempt cases of Messrs. Gompers, Mitchell and Morrison. National civic federation review, Mar., 1909, v. 3: IS. HD4802.N2,v.3 BOYCOTTS AND INJUNCTIONS: PEBIODICALS 63 1909. Amending the Sherman anti-trust law. Committee to draft bill— vital interests involved — President Low's views — modifications must apply equally to labor and capital. National civic federation review, Mar., 1909, v. S: 14-15. HD4802.N2,v.3 1909. Sweet, Ada C. A great plea for free speech and a free press. The Court of appeals decision modifying Justice Gould's injunction in the Gompers-Mitchell-Morrison case. National civic federation review, July, 1909, v. 3: 15, 27. HD4802.N2,v.3 1910. Labor unions and contempt proceediags. [Editorial]. Law notes, Jan., 1910, v. IS: 185. 1910. Noble, Herbert. The Sherman anti-trust act and industrial combinations. American law review, Mar.-Apr., 1910, v. 44-' 177-199. 1910. Furuseth, Andrew. Government by injunction — the misuse of the equity power. Central law journal, July 8, 1910, v. 71: 5-7. 1910. Shepard, Almond G. Boycotts. Principles applicable in de- termining the lawfulness of a boycott by a labor union. Case and comment, Sept., 1910, v. 17: 159-166. 1910. Littlefield, Charles E. The use and abuse of injunctions in labor controversies. Case and comment, Sept., 1910, v. 17: 173-178. 67382°— 11 5 IN^DEX Page Adams, Thomas S 3 Aiken, William P 35 Alfaasa, Maurice 16 Alger, George W 52 Allen, Andrew J 47 Allen, Charles Claflin 3 American academy of political and social science 3, 19, 20 American and English decisions in equity 3_4 American and English encyclo- paedia of law 13, 21 American antiboycott association . . 10 American bar association 3, 23 American digest 4 American economic association 11 American federation of labor 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 40, 41, 47, 49, 53, 54, 55, 57 Ann Arbor cases 31, 34, 60 Ashley, W.J 45 Atkins, Thomas S 32,33 Baldwin, E. F 52 Barker, Wharton 37 Bateman, Warner M 35 Bayne, Howard R 43 Beach, Charles Fisk 6 Beck, James M 8,10,49 Becker, Tracy C 60 Bell, Richard 6 Belmont, August 61 Bennett, A. W 57 Benton, Josiah Henry, jr 6 Bettman, Gilbert 57 Beveridge, W. H 44 Bibliography 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 35, 38 See also Cases, Tables of Biblioth^que du Musde social 16 Bishop, James, jr 6 Blacklisting 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 24, 39, 48, 54, 55, 58, 60 Bliss, William D. P 16 Bottger, Hugo 58 Bolen, George Lewis 6 Page Bope, George W 56 Boulton, A. C. Forster '. 21 Boycotting, definitions of 47 Boyle, James 56 Brigham, Clifford 32 Brown, Arthur March 51 Bryan, James Wallace 7, 45, 59 Bryan, Mary Baird '7 Bryan, William Jennings 7 Buck's stove and range company, St. Louis 5,7,8,10, 47, 49, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 Bullard, Herbert S 34 Burdick, Francis M 51 Burnett, John 33 Burns, W. F 8 Caldwell, Henry Clay 58 California. University 11 Carland, John E 9 Carnegie, Andrew 20 Cases, Tables of 9, 14, 17, SO Chandler, William E 52 Charnock, Singleton 9 Cheyney, E. P 33 Chicago railway strike, 1894. 3,8, 30, 35, 60 Citizen's library of economics, politics, and sociology 11 Clabaugh, Harry M 50 Clark, John Bates 9 Clark, Lindley D 44 Clayton, Henry D 9 Cogley, Thomas Sydenham 9 Cohen, Arthur 12 Cohen, Hermann Joseph 9 Colby, Frank Moore 18 Columbia university 13 Commons, John Rogers 10 Compendium of transportation theories 60 Conspiracy 4, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 35, 46, 58, 61 Constitutional rights of working- men 4 65 66 INDEX Page Constitutionality of use of injunc- tions in labor cases 35, 37, 58 Contempts of court 3, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 52, 53, 54, 57, 60, 61, 62, 63 Cook,E.Wake 53 Cooke, Frederick Hale 10 Corbin, Arthur Linton 19 Courts: Attitude toward labor 12, 14, 20, 23, 38, 50 Decisions 10, 24, 30, 33, 34, 39, 40, 45, 47, 49, 51, 56, 57, 60 Courts of equity 17, 38 Crosby, Ernest H 42 Crosby, Oscar T 10 Curtis, Leonard E 36 Cyclopedia of law and procedure. . 18, 19 Danbury hatters' case: See Loewe vs. Lawlor Darling, Charles R 43,49 Darlington, Joseph James 7, 8, 10 Davenport, Daniel 7, 10, 27, 42 Dean, Ben S 38 Debs, Eugene Victor 60 Debs case: See Chicago railway strike, 1894 Democratic party 51, 52, 62 Devine, Thomas H 60 Dickson, Charles A 34 District of Columbia. Court of ap- peals 8, 55, 56, 57, 63 Supreme court 8, 50, 53, 54 Donnell, F. C 61 Dorman, Lester M 33 Drew, Walter 56, 61 Dunbar, William H 11 Dunedin, Andrew Graham Murray, 1st baron 12 Dunne, Edward F 37 Durand, Edward Dana 29, 30 Dwight, Frederick 51, 62 Eaves, Lucile 11 Eddy, Arthur Jeroirie 11 Edgerton, Charles E 30 Edgerton, John Warren 18, 19 Edwards, Alba M 11 Edwards, Clement 46 Edwards, Percy L 38, 44 Ellsbree, E. C 17 Elm, Adolph von 44 Ely, Richard Theodore 11 Page Emery; James A 3, 51, 57, 58 Encyclopaedia of pleading and practice 11, 18 Erwin, James S 35 Farmers' loan and trust company. . 28, 30 Fauntleroy, Cornelius H 56 Finch, James A 29 Fisher, S. B 11,17 Fleming, William Henry 28 Florida. Supreme court 61 Flower, Benjamin Orange 41 Frazier, Walter S 59 Freedom of speech: See Libel and slander Freedom of the press: See Liberty of the press Freund, Ernst 45, 47 Frey, Erich Max 12 Furuseth, Andrew 3, 43, 45, 63 George, Henry, jr 12 Georgia bar association 6, 31 Ghent, William James 12 Gompers, Samuel 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 23, 26, 27, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 62, 63 Gould, Ashley M 8, 48, 49, 63 Grafton and Coos bar association. . 6 Grant, Luke 47 Great Britain. Laws, statutes, etc. 9, 13, 17, 30 Parliament 12 Royal commission on trade dis- putes 12, 17 Greenbaum, Milton D 61 Gregory, Charles Noble 38 Gregory, Stephen Strong 35 Gi;oat, George Gorham 13, 52 Grosscup, Peter Stenger 37 Guide to reading in social ethics. . . 19 Gunton, George 34 Hackney, Thomas 13 Haddow, John 26 Haldane, R. B 41 Hale, Richard W 54 Hallett, Allen P 13 Hammond, William A 32 Handworterbuch der Staatswissen- schaften 13 Hargis, Thomas F 37 Harvard university 19 Hatters' case: See Loewe vs. Lawlor INDEX 67 Page Heckel, Max von 13, 35 Heidelberg. Universitat 12 Heise, Stephan 44 Hendrick, Burton J 52 Henry, Robert Lee 13 Hewitt, Edgar Percy 15 High, James Lambert 13 High, Shirley T 13 Hill, David Bennett 29 History of boycotting and injunc- tions 11, 16, 32, 53,62 Hitchman coal and coke company. 25,26 Hoar anti-injunction bill 24 Holdom, Jesse 45 HouTwich, Isaac A 52 Howell, George 9, 13, 14 Huebner, Grover Gerhard 14, 47 Hughes, William. 14 Hunt, John 19 Hunter, Wiles Robert 14 Illinois state bar association 15, 60 Independent labour party 16 Indiana. State bar association: See State bar association of In- diana Interference with employees 4 Intimidation 80,41,60 Iowa state bar association 60 Jenkins, John J 27 Jevons, Thomas Seton 14 Jewett, John N 15 Joel, J. Edmondson 46 Johns Hopkins university 13 Joyce, Howard C 15 Judson, Frederick Newton 15 Jury trial 10, 23, 35, 37, 58, 60 Kennedy, John C 49 Kentucky bar association 60 Keman, John D 30 Kerr, William Williamson 15 Kirby, John, jr 56 Kleeberg, August 43 Knaus, Henry 15 Knowlton, Jerome C 62 Labor contract 29 Labor union funds 12, 16 Labor unions aa monopolies 61 Lawlor vs. Loewe: See Loewe vs. Lawlor Laws and legislation 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 30, 31, 42, 47, 49 California H Page Laws and legislation — Continued Canada 21 Connecticut 11 Germany 47 Great Britain 7, 9, 13, 14, 16, 17, 21, 25, 30, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49 Massachusetts 17 New York 13 United States 22, 24, 29, 30, 33, 44, 46 Lawyers' reports annotated 15 Leavitt, John Brooks 16 Leipart, Theodor 50 Lennon, John B 56 Lewis, Henry Harrison 52 Lewis, Llewelyn 22 Lewis, William Draper 33,34,35,38 Libel and slander 4, 10, 33, 54, 55, 56; 58, 63 Liberty of speech: See Libel and slander Liberty of the press 4, 54, 55, 56, 63 Liechti, Eugen 16 Lindsay, Samuel McCune 30 Littlefield, Charies E 3, 16, 26,28,47,50,51,60,62,63 Livernash, Edward J 43 Lloyd, Henry Demarest 16 Lockouts. 9, 12, 16, 37, 43, 53 Loewe vs. Lawlor (the hatters' case) 49, 57,58,61,62 Lorimer, J. C 36 Low, Alfred Maurice 16, 25 Low, Seth 52, 61, 62, 63 McCabe, James 37 MacDonald, Edward A 55 MacDonald, James Ramsay 16 Mack, William 18, 19 McKenzie, Peter B 18 McKinney, William M 11 McMurtrie, Richard C 33 McWilliams, Robert L 47 Mahon, John 50 Mails, Obstruction of United States. 3,61 Mandamus 21, 35 Mantoux, Paul 16 Martin, John 55 Martin, William Alexander 17 Maryland. University 18 Mason, James M 32 Mason, Norman T 34 68 INDEX Page Massachusetts. Bureau of statistics 17 Bureau of statistics of labor 17 Committee on relations between employer and employee 60 Supreme judicial court 4, 36 Meier, W. P.: 61 Merritt, Walter Gordon 18, 58 Milburn, B. A 18 Miller, James A 41 Missouri. Supreme court 36 Mitchell, John 5, 7, 10, 18, 25, 26, 51, 55, 56, 57, 61, 62, 63 Morancy, Frank W 39 Morrison, Frank 5, 7, 8, 10, 51, 55, 56, 57, 62, 63 Moses, Jacob M 18 Mothersole, Hartley B.N 12 Murphy, Walter 18 National civic federation 58, 62, 63 Neill, Charles P 3 New encyclopedia of social reform . 16 New international encyclopaedia . . 14 New international year book 18 NichoUs, Thomas David 18 Noble, Herbert 63 Northern Pacific railroad com- pany 25, 28, 30 Oklahoma bar association 20 Olmsted, Victor H 29 Parker, Alton Brooks 5, 18, 53, 55 Paterson, John Melvin 15 Patteson, Seargent Smith Prentice. 38 Pearre anti-injunction bill 21, 46 Pearson, Paul Martin 19 Pennsylvania. Supreme court '.... 4 Peterkin, William G 38 Peters, John P 16 Phihps, John F 35 Picketing 9, 10, 12, 19, 29, 36, 39, 45 Pingrey, D. H 34 Portenar, A. J 53 Post, Louis F 41 Pres^, Liberty of: See Liberty of the press Primm, C. J 57 Public policy, Chicago 19 Pullman strike, 1894: See Chicago strike, 1894 Questions of the day 10 Ralston, Jackson H 3, 5, 19 Ralston, Siddons & Richardson ... 5 Ray, Charles A 19 Ray, George Washington 27 Reed, Chester A 35 Republican party 51, 52, 62 Reynolds, Stephen Marion 60 Richardson, William E 5 Richmond, Va. Circuit court 33 Richmond, Va. Hustings court... 32,33 Ricks, Augustus J 24 Ripley, William Z 10, 19 Rogers, Henry Wade 19 Rogers, W. P 20 Rooker, William Velpau 43 Roosevelt, Theodore 20, 51, 52, 53 Sartorius von Waltershausen, Jo- hann Georg August, /m^err 20, 32 Schaffner, Margaret Anna 20, 55, 59 Seabury, Samuel 42 Seager, Henry R 48 Sedgwick, Arthur George 37 Selections and documents in eco- nomics 10 Selfridge, Arthur James 33 Selover, George H 35 Shartel, John W 20 Shepard, Almond G 59, 63 Shepard, Henry M 37 Sherman antitrust act, 1890. . . 6, 22, 24, 26, 29, 50, 52, 57, 60, 61, 62, 63 Sherwood, Isaac R 20 Siddons, Frederick L 5 Silverstein, David 50 Simpson, John 21 Smeaton, Oliphant 6 Smith, Charles Manley 21 Smith, Ernest Manley 21 Smith, Jeremiah 61 Social problems series 6 Social reform club 21, 25 South Dakota bar association 9 Speech, Freedom of: , See Libel and slander Speer, Emory 24 Speer, William H 50, 54 Spelling, Thomas Carl 21, 27, 47, 61 Stanton, Stephen B 35 State bar association of Indiana 20 Steffee, John G 42 Stephen, James Fitzjames 32 Stern, Samuel R 60 Steuart, William M 29 Stevens, Frederick W 53 Stewart, Ardemus 35 INDEX 69 Page Stillman, James W 38 Stimson, Frederick Jesup 22, 25, 29, 30, 36, 38 StoU, R. C 60 Stote, Amos 55 Strikes, Sympathetic, as boycotts. 47 Sullivan, W. C 10 Sumner, Helen L 3 Swan, Charles Herbert 22 Swayne, Wager 60 Sweet, Ada C 63 Taff-Vale case 6, 16, 42 Taft, William Howard 15, 22, 23, 24, 48, 52, 56, 57, 59, 62 Tandy, Francis D 39 Taylor, Graham 53 Temple, M.L 60 Tennessee bar association 31 Terrester 59 Territorial bar association of Utah.. 18 Thacher, Sherman D 32 Thomas, David Y 55 Thomas, Robert Young, jr 23 Thompson, Seymour D 32, 38 Tiedeman, Christopher Gustavus. . 24 Torrey, James H 44 Trickett, W .' 51 Trieber, Jacob 51, 62 Tuley, Murray F 37 Tinner, George Kibbe 53 United mine workers of America. . 14,50 United States. Bureau of labor. . . 16, 24, 25, 30 Circuit courts 24 Congress 12, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 Courts 29 Industrial commission 29, 30 Page United States— Continued. Laws, statutes, etc 24, 30 President {Roosevelt) 20 Strike commission, 1894 30 Supreme court 3, 8, 49 Upson, William H 36 Utah. Territorial bar association: See Territorial bar association of Utah Van Cleave, James W 48 Veeder, Van Vechten 56 Voorhees, Daniel W 30 Walker, Aldace F 34 Walker, John T 5 Waring, Luther Hess 31 Washington state bar association ... 60 Watson, Samuel 31 Webb, Sidney 12 Weber, William H 26 Wellford, B.B,.,jr 33 West Virginia bar association 38 White, Henry 41, 52 Wigmore, John H 33 Williams, Sydney E 15 Willingham, Wright 31 Willison, Eugene 29 Wilson, W. B 40 Wisconsin. Free library commis- sion 14 University 14 Wissell, Rudolf 53 Woollen, Evans 36 Worthington, Nicholas E 30 Wright, Carroll D 30 Wright, Daniel Thew 53, 54, 58 Wyman, Bruce 42 Yarros, Victor 36, 38 Zurich. Universitat 16 o Cornell University Library Z 7164.L1U693 Select list of references on boycotts an 3 1924 002 386 088