G67+ THE GIFT OF .&.0J\;v\ftOiJL....*^.nJi^^ Kz.S.o.Z0.h t\l:c,.l_j±^ 1357 TJ 693.067"^" ""'"^'^ Library Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924022810075 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE BY WILLIAM F. M. GOSS Dean of the College of Engineering, University of Illinois WASHINGTQ^f, D. C. ' PUBUSHED BY THB CARNBGIS INSTITUTION OP WASHINGTON I9IO SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE BY WILLIAM F. M. GOSS Dean of the College of Engineering, University of Illinois WASHINGTON, D. C. PUBUSHED BY THE CaRNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON I9IO CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON Publication No. 127 PRESS OF GIBSON BROTHERS WASHINGTON, D. C. Superheated Steam in Locomotive Service BY William F. M. Goss Dean of the College of Engineering, University of Illinois CONTENTS, Page Introduction — A Summary of Conclusions . i I. Foreign Practice in the use of Superheated Steam in Locomotive Service . . 5 II. American Attitude Toward the Use of Superheated Steam in Locomotive Service 23 III. Tests to Determine the Value of Superheating in Locomotive Service 25 IV. Performance of Boiler and Superheater 31 V. Performance of the Engine and of the Locomotive as a Whole . 5 5 VI. Locomotive Efficiency as Affected by its Running Schedule: an Account of a Series of Intermittent Tests . 65 VII. Economy Resulting from the Use of Superheated Steam . . 75 Appendix I. The Locomotive Experimented Upon .... 87 II. Tests Under Constant Conditions, Methods and Data . 95 III. Test Under Intermittent Conditions of Running, Methods and Data 129 IV. An Exhibit of Typical Indicator-Cards 139 A SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS. The results of the study concerning the value of superheated steam in loco- motive service, the details of which are presented in the succeeding pages, may be summarized as follows: 1. Foreign practice has proved that superheated steam may be successfully used in locomotive service without involving mechanism which is unduly com- plicated or difficult to maintain. 2. There is ample evidence to prove that the various details in contact with the highly heated steam, such as the superheater, piping, valves, pistons, and rod packing, as employed in German practice, give practically no trouble in maintenance; they are ordinarily not the things most in need of attention when a locomotive is held for repairs. 3. The results of tests confirm, in general terms, the statements of German engineers to the effect that superheating materially reduces the consumption of water and fuel and increases the power capacity of the locomotive. 4. The combined boiler and superheater tested contains 943 feet of water- heating surface and 193 feet of superheating surface; it delivers steam which is superheated approximately 150°. The amount of superheat diminishes when the boiler-pressure is increased, and increases when the rate of evap- poration is increased, the precise relation being T=i23— 0.265P -1-7.28 H where T represents the superheat in degrees Fahrenheit, P the boUer-pressure by gage, and H the equivalent evaporation per foot of water-heating surface per hour. 5. The evaporation efficiency of the combined boiler and superheater tested is E=ii .706 — 0.214 -^ ' where E is the equivalent evaporation per pound of fuel and H is the equiv- alent evaporation per hour per foot of water-heating and superheating surface. 6. The addition of the superheater to a boiler originally designed for satu- rated steam involved some reduction in the total area of heat-transmitting surface, but the efficiency of the combination when developing a given amount of power was not lower than that of the original boiler. 7. The ratio of the heat absorbed per foot of superheating surface to that absorbed per foot of water-heating surface ranges from o. 34 to o . 53, the value increasing as the rate of evaporation is increased. 8. When the boiler and superheater are operated at normal maximum power, and when they are served with Pennsylvania or West Virginia coal of 2 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN I.OCOMOTIVE SERVICE. good quality, the available heat supplied is accounted for approximately as follows : Per cent Absorbed by water 52 Absorbed by steam in superheater 5 Utilized 57 Lost in vaporizing moisture in coal 5 Lost in CO ■- I Lost through high temperature of escaping gases 14 Lost in the form of sparks and cinders 12 Lost through grate 4 Lost through radiation, leakage, and unaccounted for 7 9. The water consumption under normal conditions of running has been established as follows : Boiler- pressure. Corresponding steam per in- dicated horse- power hour. Pou7ids. 120 160 200 240 Pounds. 23-8 22.3 21.6 22.6 The minimum steam consumption for the several pressures is materially below the values given. The least for any test was 20.29 potmds. 10. The coal consumption under normal conditions of running has been established as follows : Boiler- pressure. Coal consumed per indicated horse-power hour. Pounds. 120 160 200 240 Pounds. 3-31 3.08 2.97 3.12 11. Neither the steam nor the coal consumption are materially affected by considerable changes in boiler-pressure, a fact which justifies the use of com- paratively low pressures in connection with superheating. 12. Contrary to the usual conception, the conditions of cut-off attending maximum cylinder efficiency are substantially the same for steam superheated 150 degrees as for saturated steam. With superheated steam, when the boiler-pressure is 120, the best cut-off is approximately 50 per cent stroke, but this value should be diminished as the pressure is raised, until at 240 pounds it becomes 20 per cent. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 3 I 13. Tests under low steam-pressures, for which the cut-off is later than half stroke, give evidence of superheat in the exhaust. 14. The saving in water consumption and in coal consumption per unit power developed which was effected by the superheating locomotive Schenec- tady No. j in comparison with the saturated-steam locomotive Schenectady No. 2 is as follows : Saving in water consumption. Saving in coal consumption. Boiler- pressure, Locomotive. Boiler- pressure. Locomotive. Saturated steam. Super- heating. Gain. Saturated steam. Super- heating. Gain. Pounds. 120 160 200 240 Pounds. 29. I 26.6 25-5 24-7 Pounds. 23-8 22,3 21.6 22.6 Per cent. 18 16 15 9 Pounds. 120 160 200 240 Pounds. 4.00 3-59 3-43 3-31 Pounds. 331 3.08 2.97 3.12 Per cent. 17 14 13 6 15. The power capacity of the superheating locomotive is greater than that of the saturated-steam locomotive. 16. Tests involving intermittent running show that the steam consumption per unit work delivered is increased when the program of operations is made to involve intervals of rest, due doubtless to the coohng of the cylinders and the connected parts. This loss increases with increase of steam-pressure. When the program of operations involves equal periods of rest and running it amounts to from 5 to 10 per cent of the consumption under constant running; adding to this the losses resulting from low efficiency when starting and the radiation and stack losses during the periods of idleness, the total loss resulting from such intermittent running, as compared with constant running, is approxi- mately 20 per cent. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 1. FOREIGN PRACTICE IN THE USE OF SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE.* 1. The Use of Superheated Steam in Locomotive Service. — In the year 1898 the first superheating locomotives, two in number, were placed in service upon the Prussian State Railway. As might have been expected in machines of new design, a number of difficulties were encountered in their operation, but one by one these were overcome. Special forms of pistons, of piston-valves, and of rod packing, designed better to withstand exposure to steam of high temperature, were introduced. In 1899 the two original superheating loco- motives were followed by two superheating express locomotives, and in 1900 by two superheating tank locomotives, the superheaters of all being of the same design. While these six trial engines were by no means perfect, they served to show that highly superheated steam might be generated and success- fully employed in locomotive service. As a result of the experience thus gained, the Prussian State Railway has since 1900 made large purchases of the new type of engine. So rapidly has their use increased that in April, 1907, there were 682 in service and 467 in the process of building, or covered by orders; while in the whole Empire of Germany there were 1,320 locomotives of the new type running or on order. The locomotive builders of Germany draw their support from many different countries. While building super- heating locomotives for the Kmpire, they have stimulated interest in and created a demand for the new type in other countries. Thus, Belgium, Russia, ♦The facts presented in this chapter are based upon personal observations during the summer of 1907 and upon information supplied by engineers who are more or less intimately associated with the development of locomotive design. Among those to whom acknowl- edgment is especially due should be mentioned Herr Wilhelm Schmidt, of Cassel, Germany, president of Schmidt's Superheating Company, Limited, London, and his representative in Berlin, Herr S. Hoffman; Herr Geheimer Baurat Robert Garbe, of the Prussian State Railways, BerUn, and his chief assistant, Herr Smeltzer; Herr Director E. Briickmann, of the Berliner Maschinenbau-Actien-Gesellschaft (Schwartzkopf works) ; Herr Director F. Bukler, of the Bossig Works, Tegel, Berlin; Herr Geheimer Baurat Schafer, of the Prussian State Railway, Hanover, and to Freiherr von Eltz Rubenacht, Regierungs baumeister, a member of his staff; Herr Buschbaum, engineer and purchasing agent of the Hanno- verschen Maschinenbau-Actien-Gesellschaft (Egestorff works) ; Herr Ober Baurat Politzsch, director-general of the Saxony State Railways, and Herr Baurat Gustav Hultsch, of Dresden; Herr President Adelbert Hauck, of the Bavarian State Railway Direction, of Munich, and Herr Ober Regienungrat Schaller and Herr Expeditor Troeger, members of his staff; Herr Ludwig Buchler, engineer; J. A. Maffei (Maffei works) ; Herr von Helmholtz, engineer, Krauss & Company, Actien Gesellschaft, Munich; M. Flame, chief of motive power, Belgium State Railways, Brussels; M. Eugene Flaman, engineer in charge of equipment. Eastern Railway of France, Paris; M. Sabouret, chief engineer in charge of equipment. Western Railway of France, Paris; and Mr. Dugald Drummond, locomotive superintendent of the London and Southwestern Railway, England. 6 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Austria, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy, France, Holland, England, Denmark, Spain, Greenland, Canada, and South America all have their German-designed and German-built superheaters, and at the time just quoted, April, 1907, the total number of superheating locomotives in service or on order for all coun- tries approached closely to 2,000. This rapid extension of a new practice expresses the degree of confidence which many engineers have in its value. In fact, the introduction of the superheater has become a world-wide move- ment, and as such it is entitled to the respect and the thoughtful attention of American engineers. Of the world's 2,000 superheating locomotives but eight are credited to the United States. 2. Leaders in the Superheating Movement. — Even a brief r6sum^ of the development of the practice of superheating in locomotive service would be incomplete did it not recognize the work of its two foremost advocates, Herr Wilhelm Schmidt, of Cassel, and Herr Robert Garbe, of Berlin. Herr Wilhelm Schmidt, as an inventor and promoter, has devoted himself for more than twenty years to problems closely related with the generation and utilization of high-temperature steam. His first successes were in sta- tionary practice. These were followed by results of greater significance in connection with locomotive service. The history of the development of loco- motive superheating is in fact hardly more than a story of his difficulties and successes. Herr Robert Garbe, Geheimer Baurat, a high official in the Prussian railway service and skilled in the problem of locomotive design and mainten- ance prior to the advent of superheating, early manifested his interest in that subject. When the Ministry of the Prussian State Railway decided to undertake experiments in superheating, Herr Garbe was put in charge of them. His position madehim thenatural ally of Herr Schmidt, and together they worked assiduously in perfecting details of design. Besides troubles arising from parts in contact with superheated steam, they found that new conditions brought added stresses to other parts of the machine, and these were one after another redesigned and brought to a new standard of excellence. From the beginning of the practice in Prussia, Herr Garbe has occupied the position of engineer in charge of superheating equipment, and under the Ministry he has been in supreme control of the design, purchase, and mainte- nance of all such equipment. The Ministry determines what proportion of an order for locomotives shall be superheating, but it does not undertake to dictate as to their design nor as to the materials to be employed in their construction. These are matters for which Herr Garbe is held responsible. Moreover, he not only determines the characteristics of new equipment, but he issues rules governing maintenance, which are to be observed in the round- houses and shops wherever the superheating locomotives go. As German railway officials are not all enthusiastic in their support of the superheating locomotive, it is conceivable that under a less rigid organization the practical Ih9 p,(j 1 — A superheated-steam express locomotive of the Prussian State Railway. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 7 difRculties encountered in perfecting them might easily have prevented any- great progress; but indifference and opposition alike have always been met by the personality of Herr Garbe, and he in turn has had the constant and unqualified support of the Ministry which appointed him. 3. Types of Superheaters. — The original Schmidt locomotive superheater was of the smoke-box type, and practically half of the superheating locomo- tives now in operation on the Prussian State Railway are of this design. The later introduction of the Schmidt fire-tube type of superheater has, however, proved so satisfactory that the manufacture of the earlier smoke-box type has in recent years been discontinued. All of the superheating locomotives of the Prussian State, now under construction, are to be equipped with this later type. Other forms of superheaters have been proposed and one of these has been used experimentally, but the practice of superheating in Europe as it exists to-day implies the use of the Schmidt fire-tube superheater. The introduction of this superheater (figs, i and 2) requires that the upper part of the boiler be fitted with from two to four rows of large smoke-tubes which are expanded into the fire-box and front tube-sheet of the boiler, in a special manner. These tubes have an inside diameter ranging from 4 to 5.25 inches, which diameter is reduced somewhat near the fire-box end. Inserted in each of these large tubes is a superheater element or section consisting of a set of pipes bent in the form of a double U and connected at the smoke-box end to a header, the whole arrangement being such as to form a continuous double-looped tube. Each particle of steam in passing from the boiler to the branch-pipes has to traverse some one of these elements, making four passes in the movement.* The ends of each element extend into the smoke-box, where they are bent slightly upward and are expanded into a common flange which is secured to a steam-collector by a single central bolt. Two slightly different methods are employed in arranging the pipe-ends in the smoke-box. By the first method the pipes are bent upward only (fig. 2) , as already described, in which case the flange-joints are horizontal, and the flanges are fastened by vertical bolts, the heads of which are movable in slots in the bottom of the collector casting. By the second method (fig. i) the pipes are carried forward and are bent upward and backward in such a manner as to connect with vertical flanges secured by horizontal studs to the steam-collector. Both methods have been extensively used, the latter being the one which has been finally selected by the Prussian State Railway. The construction of the steam- collector and the manner in which connection is made with the steam-pipes and with the branch-pipes is best shown by the figure. *In the original arrangement each element consisted of two separate single-loops, but it has been found that the double looping of the superheating pipes, by increasing the velocity at which the steam travels, results in the better protection of the tubes against overheating and in the more effective superheating of the steam. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN I,OCOMOTlVE SERVICE. 9 By the construction which was adopted the gases of combustion are divided, one part passing through the ordinary boiler-tubes and the other through the larger tubes. In the larger tubes a portion of the heat is given up to the water surrounding the tubes and a portion to the steam contained in the superheating elements inclosed. The flow of heat through the large tubes is controlled by dampers hinged or pivoted below the steam-collector in the smoke-box. As long as the throttle of the locomotive is closed these dampers are kept closed, either by a counterweight or by a spring, but as soon as the throttle is opened they are opened simultaneously by means of a piston work- ing in a small automatic steam-cyhnder. Thus, while getting up steam or while standing at stations, tmder any conditions in fact for which no steam is passing the loops of the superheater to keep them cool, no gases of com- bustion can pass through the large smoke-tubes to heat them. This arrange- ment provides against the overheating of the superheating pipes. It is only when the throttle is open and when, as a consequence, steam is passing through the superheating pipes, that the dampers which control the circulation of the heated gases open and permit them to have contact with the superheating elements. The limited number of the superheating elements and their small diameter provides a comparatively small area through which the steam must pass from the boiler to the engine-cylinders. The degree of restriction constitutes one of the important elements in the design of the Schmidt superheater. It has been found that the superheating surface is made more effective as the flow of the circulating steam is made more rapid; the statement by a German authority being that for constant-temperature differences the rate of heat transmission varies as the square root of the velocity of the steam. By maintaining high velocities through the superheating pipes, therefore, two important results are accomplished: first, a higher degree of superheat is obtained than would otherwise be possible; and, second, the protection of the superheating elements against overheating is made more complete. The degree of restriction employed in the Schmidt superheaters is such that when the engine is working at full power with the throttle wide open, the drop in pressure between the boiler and the valve-box is approximately 15 pounds. It is stated that under these conditions the velocity through the superheating tubes varies from 325 to 400 feet per second. The superheaters thus described have an abundant capacity. Locomotives fitted with them are provided with a dial thermometer showing the tempera- ture of the steam in the valve-box. After starting, this temperature steadily rises until it exceeds 300° C. (572° F.), after which the dampers controlUng the circulation of heat through the superheater-tubes are partially closed by means of mechanism which connects with a hand-wheel in the cab. This manipulation of the dampers is such as will check the rising temperature before the maximum safe limit of 350° C. (662° F.) is reached. lO SUPERHEATED STEAM IN I^: ■^"~ if li j ISO Iff t tit da i ff iii^ ''.'i' 11 1 i: t Si ffi i i"'! m^M ~ i ; j j fji^f-^ -^- -^^ H 1 fg ^' if::ii ^v ;. jJ5^ l\ ' tttt s i" --J ■T!/:--tt 11 ii 100 Wi ' ^1 ■ 1 ::.[ ^Hf yt ill : lj . f i 1 1 m i 1 ' i; S I Ml ill M 111 PmWmj II 11 ll^^ 1 |: ; a in Hi i 50 m MMmb ti tftj ft 1 ffw! 1 ip : ii^ 1 P 1 : E [ ^ ;l; si ^ j; I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 20. — Superheating as affected by rate of evaporation, boiler-pressure 120 pounds. 17. Draft. — -The draft produced in the front-end of the locomotive was measured at a point directly in front of the diaphragm. Values thus deter- mined expressed in inches of water are given in column 39, Appendix II. The rate of increase in draft values with increased rates of evaporation is 36 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. well shown by fig. 22. This figure gives the results of tests at 160 pounds only. Curves representing points obtained at other pressures are practically identical with those shown, the fact being that changes in boiler-pressure, within the limits of the experiments, have practically no influence upon draft values. As would be expected, these depend entirely upon the rate of evaporation required. 200 150 100 50 50 fOO 150 SOO 250 Fig. 21. — Degrees of superheat under all conditions of pressure when rate of evaporation is 1 1 pounds per foot of heating-surface per hour. 7 ||||||i|M ; ■ ■ r 6 : : : : 5 1 1 4 3 1 II 1 Miii 1 |: 1 2 1 ^ ^ '' ^ 1 H ii I' i f ! ij 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 22. — Draft in front of diaphragm. 18. Smoke=Box Temperatures. — The temperatures of the smoke-box gases were read by a mercurial thermometer placed midway between the diaphragm and the front tube-sheet. Values for this quantity will be found in column SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 37 40, Appendix II. These values, plotted with the rate of evaporation (figs. 23 to 26), show the effect upon the smoke-box temperature of changes in the rate of power. It will be seen that the smoke-box temperature increases as the rate of evaporation is increased, an effect the significance of which is well understood. For example, when the rate of evaporation equals 6 pounds of water per foot of heating-surface, the smoke-box temperature is approxi- mately 600° F. When the rate of evaporation is increased to 12, the tempera- ture of the smoke-box approaches 800° F. It is not far from the truth to say that a change of i pound in the rate of evaporation produces a change 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 Fig. 23. — Smoke-box temperature, boiler-pressure 240 pounds. f4 n H 1 If \4 f • ^UO finn i 1 1 500 i :: It Sj fci ^- ^ ^ xtt 400 ; ili n ffj 300 TOO 1 W H ■ 100 1 i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JO II 12 13 14 Fig. 24. — Smoke-box temperature, boiler-pressure 200 pounds. 38 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. of 20° in the temperature of the smoke-box. Comparing the results of the several diagrams, the smoke-box temperature shows a slight tendency to increase with increase of pressure, other things being the same, but the dif- ferences are too slight to be accepted as material. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 i. — Smoke-box temperature, boiier-pressure 160 pounds. Fig. 2S.- 80C j ;; ||l||l|ll|l||||]|||l|j|B i 1 ■■ rocM S ' ' ' ' 1 i 60C 1 50C 1 i : ^ IB AO' a 3DC 1 : : '^^^It 1 IOC -^ mm wmmm H# gn ImfflfflffWTM 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 26. — Smoke-box temperature, boiler-pressure 120 pounds. 19. Evaporative Efficiency of the Combined Boiler and Superheater, as expressed by the pounds of water evaporated from and at 212°, equivalent to the weight of superheated steam delivered per pound of dry coal, is given for each test by column 53, Appendix II. These values, plotted with the equivalent evaporation per square foot of surface in the boiler and super- SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 39 1 m i'" m i SCLi4t M : fflttiJi 10 9 1 lllllll ■ 11^ ■ ; 8 1 pg ^1 1 1,^ C ^1^1 1 ':\ 7 1 : 1 1 [ p'S ^JtlT^i ^"t^"^ 6 M : 5 4 HI ; 'I m ^H 2 m H i'- i n-t 1 1 i: ■' ! M ■ ; ^- I' ^ n 1 ^ 1 1 [:: : 5 j ! : J • ' i B 'i :li I 1 m 1 1 2 i ( 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 m f li I M Fig. 27. — Equivalent evaporation, combined boiler and superheater; boiler-pressure 240 pounds. 6 7 6 9 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 28.— Equivalent evaporation, combined boiler and superheater; boiler-pressure 200 pounds. 40 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. II 10 I : :: IH II HI 9 1 III 8 ^H ^H 7 9 6 5 4 ■1 ' BB fl : : 3 1 ■ ? n : : : : 1 PwWE E ' in 1 2 3 4 £ > 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 29. — Equivalent evaporation, combined boiler and superheater; boiler-pressure 160 pounds. II ■Ml ■ i ■IlllllllllilllllillllllllilillilillW 10 8 1 liiil 1 IIS' m 6 i ' 7 III ■■■ 6 6 4 H ,1 § i- 2 |: 1 11 i ifii 11 1 litilllilillilllll^^ 1 M' llllllllllllllllllly^ ' i yi ttw 1 mQiiumU 1 fflllHiilfBJHUi 8 S 10 -H 12 13 14 Fig. 30. — Equivalent evaporation, combined boiler and superheater; boiler-pressure 120 pounds. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 41 heater per hour (column 48, Appendix II), are given as figs. 27 to 30, inclusive. Through the plotted points of each diagram a mean line has been drawn, the equation of which appears on the diagram. The slope of the average lines of the diagrams, figs. 27 to 30, was determined by plotting on a single sheet the results of all 240-pound tests, 6 in number, together with those of 6 repre- sentative tests from each of the other series. These were divided into two groups, the averages of which determined two points which were assumed to define the slope required. The diagram thus developed is shown by fig. 31. The lines drawn on the diagrams, figs. 27 to 30, have this slope and pass through a derived point which is the average of all points plotted. On all diagrams the derived or average point is represented by a cross inclosed by a circle. The individual diagrams (figs. 27 to 30) show clearly the efi^ect upon boiler efficiency of changes in the output of power, while a comparison of the several diagrams, one with another, will show that, within limits covered by the experiments, the effect upon boiler efficiency of changes in boiler-pressure is slight. Basing a statement upon the facts thus presented, it appears that if the discussion is allowed to concern itself with very small differences, the highest efficiency is obtained when the boiler-pressure is lowest; conversely, the lowest efficiency results when the boiler-pressure is highest. But, except in the case of tests at 120 pounds, the results of which do not compare closely 13 14 Fig. 31. — Equivalent evaporation per pound of coal, under all conditions of pressure- combined boiler and superheater. ' 42 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. with those for other pressures, the differences are hardly more than measur- able. In a larger sense, it seems to be true that changes in boiler-pressure between the limits of 120 pounds and 240 pounds have practically no effect upon the evaporative efficiency of the boiler. It has already been shown that the temperature of the smoke-box gases is substantially the same, what- ever may be the boiler-pressure, provided, of course, the output of power remains unchanged, which may be accepted as further confirmation of this statement. These general conclusions are in agreement with those already established for locomotives using saturated steam.* Proceeding on this basis, it is clear that a general expression for the evaporative efficiency of the combined boiler and superheater may be based upon the results of all tests, regardless of the pressure at which they were run. Such expression is repre- sented by the line drawn through the plotted points of fig. 31. The equation for this line, and consequently one which defines in general terms the per- formance of the combined boiler and superheater, is E—ii .706 — 0.214 H where E is the equivalent evaporation from and at 212° F. per pound of dry coal and H is the equivalent evaporation per square foot of water and super- heating surface. 20. Evaporative Efficiency of the Boiler, Exclusive of the Superheater. — The equivalent evaporation of the boiler per pound of dry coal (column 51, Appendix II), in terms of the equivalent evaporation per square foot of water- heating surface in the boiler per hour (column 46, Appendix II), is shown in fig. 32. The equation for the mean line drawn through these points is £ = 11.105— o. 2087 H This curve is substantially of the same slope as that which represents the performance of the combined boiler and superheater (fig. 31), but it represents values which are lower, a result due to the fact that the basis of the compari- son practically assumed that the heat which is normally absorbed by the superheater is in this case lost. 21. The Division of Work between Water and Superheating Surface. — The ratio of the heat absorbed per square foot of superheating surface to that absorbed per square foot of water-heating surface (column 49, Appendix II) may be accepted as an expression of the relative efficiency of the water and superheater surface. Figs. 33 to 36 represent this quantity plotted against equivalent evaporation per square foot of water-heating surface -for the several boiler-pressures. Referring to these figures, it will be seen that as the rate of evaporation increases, there is a corresponding increase in the ratio of the heat absorbed per square foot of superheater surface to that *High Steam-Pressures in Locomotive Service, Publication No. 66, Carnegie Institution of Washington. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 43 absorbed per square foot of boiler surface. Thus, when the boiler-pressure is i6o pounds, the ratio has a value of 34 per cent when the rate of evaporation is 6 pounds of water per square foot of water-heating surface and 53 per cent when the rate of evaporation is increased to 14 pounds. Comparing the lines of the diagrams for the several different pressures, it appears that if these lines were superimposed they would very nearly coincide; that is, the value of the ratio is independent of the boiler-pressure. 1* Ji_ fi i 1 ** 1 i •1 «g 1 p § ii i 1 fc ro 1 4^ ^-= H-^ 5 S h^^P ™fi 9 ss ^f MT' M=F ^ff fe< n±t S ^ ' fll^lv^ ^ Sp ■ ■J r ^ 1 = 2lfl7 ■ WM-' i 1 s 1 'hi-' ^ gill i H^4 1 1 1 10 U 12 13 14 Fig. 32. — Equivalent evaporation per pound of coal under all conditions of pressure, exclusive of the superheater. 22. Smoke=Box Gases. — The percentage of excess air in terms of equivalent evaporation per foot of heating-surface per hour, as obtained in tests at the several different boiler-pressures, is shown by figs. 37 to 40. No attempt has been made to draw curves through the plotted points. The points serve to show, however, that the amount of excess air is in all cases small and that it distinctly tends to diminish as the rate of evaporation is increased. The reason for this is to be found in the fact that in locomotive service higher rates of evaporation necessarily involve the use of thicker fires, which offer greater resistance to the admission of air. The percentage of carbon dioxide (COj) present in the smoke-box gases ranges from 10.8 to 14.6. The significance of these results as factors in any general comparison is impaired by the variable quahty of the fuel used. Taken as they stand, they do not disclose any well-defined law governing the changes in their value with changes in the rate of combustion. The 44 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Fig. 33. — Relative efficiency of the superheating surface, that of the water-heating sur. face being 100; boiler-pressure 240 pounds. Fig. 34. — Relative efaciency of the superheating surface, that of the water-heating surface being 100; boiler-presstire 200 pounds. SUPBRHEAXeD STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 45 BOJ i : £ ^{gj^g j ^^ m 1 ;;li " i| [ 7e| ^B i 6C 1 ; j 1 1 1 : 50 ^■Mlii i ' 9e 1 AO 30 ^^B ;: ■ 1 li 'i!^ 31 ::: :|::: 2.U J M 1 il||| I ^ ^ ■- 1 ; \\ ^ N li^ii 1 Ie I § ii iji: 1 i ; 1 2 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 35. — Relative efficiency of the superheating surface, that of the water-heating surface being 100; boiler-pressure 160 pounds. MM- :: ' :; 80 lilli 70 ^™ 60 ^"f 50 1 40 i' ti'i" "H 1 i^'^^liHIli i :i . : I ^ : ■ .: i ■■/.I •»fl 1 AfcWtW p 1 : ^ B: t 1 1 i^j r ^?^ EiJiS i ■ '^ i^ [i : !, : 1 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 36. — Relative efficiency of the superheating surface, that of the water-heating surface being 100; bdiler-pressure 120 pounds. 46 SUPBRHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. highest values are, however, those which were obtained in tests under the higher pressures, the average value for all tests at 240 pounds being 14.25, while the average value for all tests at 120 pounds is but 11 .70. This may be accepted as evidence that, for some reason not defined, the fire was main- tained in a more efficient condition during the tests under high pressure than 60 1 50 1 1 40 P i i i ' ' 30 g I ■ 1 :; |:, ■ ■ ^ : : : : ;:; : : : '■'^ ■■ : ■ -\ ii :i 1 i p i 11 t 1 1^ 1 1 : ii 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 || 12 13 14 Fig. 37. — Excess air in the smoke-box; boiler-pressure 240 pounds. ^ ifl lif™ tiO i' i— 70 : ;: i i iNi:^ 60 1 ::: T j bO f ; :: ;: 40 50 lt 1 ■ ■ 20 10 ll ; QPJ^lfT I^HlK S^ul ^ i ^mpi^^ |J i| : i i: I 2 3 4 5 6 7 ~ 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 38. — Excess air in the smoke-box; boiler-pressure 200 pounds. during those at lower pressures. It is in fact well understood in the labora- tory that the development of a given power with higher-pressure steam is more exacting upon the fireman than the development of the same power with steam at a lower pressure. The percentage of carbon monoxide (CO) present in the smoke-box gases is never great (column 67, Appendix II), notwithstanding the low percent- age of excess air present. At the same time, there are no tests that do not show the presence of a trace or more than a trace of this gas. Its ten- SUPERHEATED STEAM IN I^OCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 47 dency to increase as the percentage of excess air diminishes is well shown by fig. 41- This figure shows also that under similar conditions the com- bustion of the Pocahontas coal is less perfect than that of the Youghiogheny, a result which is more hkely to be due to the presence of a greater percentage of fine coal in the Pocahontas than to difi'erences in composition. The ten- 1 60 50: f: 40 : i 30 1 1 IliPli iiiii^ ^^rp iO 1 |^|^^|||:^^j|t j|||: } 1 j^l j 10 1 Wfi 1 ■■■^■|' ; 234 5 6 7-8 9 10 II 12 13' 14 mfMffM P i I II s 80 70 ■ : 1 ■ ll ■ 60 1 ii t ; : 50 1 n ■lli ■ 1 :| 1 : #t# 1 [i 40 1 : : :: SO i III 1 1 20 Si ^ j: in 11 m 1 t'A 1 • • : 1 m yfflfy^ 1 ill 1 1 i UiS:^i^iSlK rW WSm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 Fig. 40, — Excess air in the smoke-box; boiler -pressure 120 pounds. dency of carbon monoxide to increase with increased rates of evaporation is shown by fig. 42. This tendency is doubtless due to mechanical conditions. It may be accepted also as a function of that tendency to which attention has already been called. Thus, increased rates of evaporation demand higher rates of combustion, and these in turn require more air, which must be sup- plied by an increase in the strength of the draft-action. In the presence of a stronger draft the bed of the fire must be thickened, and the thicker fire throttles the passage of air into the fire-box to such an extent that the supply 48 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. is not commensurate with the increase in the draft- action; hence a reduction in the amount of excess air, and this, as has already been shown, leads to an increase in the percentage of unconsumed gas. •tttttttttttttttl 20 1.8 1.6 :: ; ^^ L2 (.0 • 8 : .6 A VMM ' g; |i||n|||i||||||l|| .2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1^^^^^ :: : 1 1 IJ n 1 IB^ 10 20 ! SO 40 50 60 70 Fig. 41. — Carbon monoxide and excess air. liitii liltHltltttt fM Ffnc IjTT ITT ma Mf f f t:: Era pra mffl r ^ ^'^ 1 k n i 1 i 1 k It wis f- 1 f i| i iPi y 1 1 1.4 4TERMITTENT TESTS. 31. Coal Saving as Affected by Operating Conditions. — In the work which has preceded it has been the purpose to deiine the efficiency of the boiler and engines of the locomotive experimented upon, under constant conditions of operation. Tests were not started until the engine had been subjected to preliminary running and until all parts of the machine had had an opportunity to assume the temperature normal to the conditions prescribed for the test. Performance thus defined may be accepted as maximum. The conditions of service introduce avenues through which losses occur which do not appear in a test run under such conditions. In the process of starting fires, in raising steam-pressure, and in moving the locomotive from its round-house to its train, fuel is required which is not made immediately available in the movement of trains; fuel is consumed while the locomotive stands at sta- tions or upon passing tracks, and a considerable amount is in the fire-box unconsumed when the locomotive dehvers up its train at its terminal. The percentage of the total fuel supplied a locomotive which is thus accounted for depends upon local conditions and upon the character of the service. It is important to note that no improvement in the thermodynamic action of the locomotive can materially effect an economy in the use of the fuel thus accounted for. 32. An Outline of Laboratory Tests Involving Intermittent Running. — As a part of a study designed to show the value of superheated steam in locomotive service, an attempt has been made to secure an estimate of those expenditures of heat which may not be reduced or otherwise affected by the general adop- tion of superheating locomotives. To this end tests have been made in the course of which the movement of the locomotive and the amount of work done by it have been controlled in response to a fixed schedule, the observa- tions including the consumption of coal, water, etc., covering the entire period from the starting of fires to the end of the day's work. Altogether nine such tests have been run, the duration of each being 8 hours and 20 minutes. In all cases the first starting of the engine occurred 1 20 minutes after the starting of fires and the remaining 400 minutes of the test were occupied with definite periods of running and of standing. In one series of tests the nmning was made to equal one-half of the total time and these tests will hereafter be referred to as "half-time tests." In the other series the running time equaled one-quarter of the total time, and these tests will hereafter be referred to as 65 66 1 •" 1 i S 1 ! i i 1 J — ^ 1 -^i.-k "i^ - o - ' ; 1 3 1 '"' - 1 1 - 1 ] j 1 o Y — ■ Tii i' \ _ ■l-iJ. I - 1 ! 1 i 1 ■ - ii _ - F?TE i' 1 \ ^ *" g ^ lU I ! _ ■"'4 r^i '^ 1 t - ii 1 - i J — -|.:i It ^ ^ T^ o LJ „ r ° _ ! ■" 1 1 r. 1 ■* n i -J ,1 J — ^ -*:-}:k ,' K — o ' - - n 1 ■* ^ '■" _ ° o aj m 111 -; 0±OM o o c .g_ F- p-^n q33dS Tn i|3ans sasd I -2.'' t rd S t- g i M- O s C^- lO J^ -^ i-^ o _£ ^ 1 5 o pi^^iii^lly'''''******'**'^ Fig. 65. — Steam consumption under identical conditions of power, speed, etc., as deliv- ered, At by constant running tests, B, by intermittent tests. tests. The lower line (A) shows the same relation as developed by the full- time tests under constant conditions normal to the ordinary work of the locomotive. The upper curve is located from two series of points indicated by crosses in circles, one series referring to the half-time intermittent tests, the other to the quarter- time intermittent tests. It will be seen that for all pressures the steam consumption is greater as derived from the intermittent tests, and that the difference begins to increase with increase of steam-pressure beyond 160 pounds. Thus, at 120 pounds boiler-pressure, the steam consumption is approximately 5 per cent greater for the intermittent tests, and at 240 pounds it is fully 10 per cent greater. This diagram may be accepted as showing the difference in steam consump- tion under identical conditions of running, except that in the case of the lower curve the running is continuous and in the case of the upper curve it is intermittent. The difference undoubtedly results from the cooling of the SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 71 metallic parts of the engine during the time it is standing and the recurring necessity of reheating these parts after the engine has been started. The amount of steam required per indicated horse-power hour, based upon the average power developed for full-time constant condition tests and for the half-time and quarter-time tests, is shown by fig. 66. The values in this figure representing the intermittent tests are based upon the total duration of the test, including periods of idleness, acceleration, and constant running. The increased steam consumption resulting from the intervals of idleness and the intervals during which the running is at half the power amounts to 19 50 too ISO 200 250 Fig. 66. — Steam consumption as affected by schedule of running. per cent for the half-time tests and 31 per cent for the quarter- time tests, when the boiler-pressure is 1 20 pounds, these values being reduced to a min- imum for a pressure of approximately 180 pounds. Obviously, the losses resulting from intermittent running, as set forth in this diagram, include those which are defined by fig. 65, and also those which occur through the low efii- ciencyof the engine under starting conditions and such as result from radiation, leakage, etc., while standing. They are necessarily a function of the schedule and apply to conditions of practice only in so far as the schedules adopted may be regarded as typical of practice. They are also losses which can not be greatly affected by the substitution of superheated for saturated steam. No steam was lost by the safety-valve during any of the intermittent tests. 36. Coal per Draw=bar Horse=power is given in columns 53 to 55, Appendix III, and is shown graphically by fig. 67. The figure shows that at the lower boiler-pressures the difference in the amount of coal required to develop a horse-power at the draw-bar for intermittent running in comparison with that 72 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. :] :: : ; :; : ::i ::i: ; 6 5 mmi i:N ^^ 1 A 3 IB 1 (: 2 1 ... 1 il 1 1 1 IWffiWi 50 00 ipMiP ilMJ Fig. 67. — Coal consumption as affected by the schedule of running. required in running under constant conditions is considerably less than for higher pressures. A part of this difference is undoubtedly due to small leakage losses, which of course persist even during the time the engine is standing. In this connection it is again necessary to state that the relations shown by fig. 67 do not charge against the engine the amount of coal used in firing up. The extent to which the charging of this coal would affect the values is well shown by the comparison of values which appear in table 4. 37. Conclusions to be Drawn from the Results of the Intermittent Tests. — The results show: 1 . That the locomotive under test in the laboratory may be operated under any desired schedule, which schedule may be duplicated with a satisfactory degree of accuracy from day to day. 2. The boiler efficiency of a locomotive which is run intermittently is not materially lower than that of a locomotive under constant conditions of operation. 3. The steam consumption of a locomotive, the schedule of which involves standing time in excess of its running time, is increased during the time it is in motion by from 5 to 10 per cent of its normal consumption while running, due to the cooling of its cylinders and connected parts while at rest. This statement makes no allowance for losses which, in practice, may occur at the safety-valve while standing. 4. A locomotive, the schedule of which involves standing time in excess of its running time, and which in starting after its several periods of rest is required to work under conditions less efficient than those of normal running, SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 73 may consume an amount of steam lo to 20 per cent in excess of its normal consumption under constant conditions of running. 5. The steam consumption of a locomotive, the schedule of which involves intermittent running, is from 10 to 22 per cent greater than that for constant running when the idle time equals the running time, and is from 23 to 34 per cent greater when the idle time is double the running time. 6. The coal consumption of a locomotive, the schedule of which involves intermittent running, is from 11 to 30 per cent greater than that for constant running when the idle time equals the running time, and from 24 to 52 per cent greater when the idle time is double the running time. 7. The increase in the coal consumption resulting from the intermittent movement of the locomotive is least for the locomotive experimented upon for steam-pressures between 160 and 200 pounds. 8. The coal consumption of a locomotive the schedule of which involves intermittent running, will be increased by an amount which is not less than 20 per cent of the values given in paragraphs 6, 7, and 8, if the coal used in starting the fires is charged against it. VII. ECONOMY RESULTING FROM THE USE OF SUPERHEATED STEAM. 38. Comparisons Involving Boiler and Superheater. — ^The whole discussion as presented in the preceding chapters has been developed with a view to establishing in concise terms the performance of the locomotive experimented upon while operating under superheated steam. The method of expressing results and the units of measurement employed have been so chosen that a comparison may readily be made with those which have previously been derived for the same locomotive when, as Schenectady No. 2, it was operated with saturated steam. The changes in the extent of heat-transmitting surface resulting from the apphcation of the superheater are described in detail by Appendix I. Data concerning the performance under saturated steam, which are made a basis for comparison, are drawn from a previous report entitled "High Steam- Pressures in I^ocomotive Service."* Youghiogheny coal or its reduced equivalent has been used in all cases. 39. Boiler Performance. — The boiler of Schenectady No. 2, designed for delivering saturated steam, gave an efficiency expressed by the equation £=11.305—0.221 H while the boiler as equipped with a Cole superheater, Schenectady No. j, gave an efficiency expressed by the equation £■=11.706—0.214 H Obviously, on the basis of these equations, the superheating boiler has the advantage. The comparison is, however, not a fair one, since in both cases the equations are based on the extent of heat-transmitting surface, and in Schenectady No. 3 such surface was sacrificed in making room for the super- heater. To make the comparison fair, the term in the equation represent- ing equivalent pounds of water per square foot of heating surface must be expressed in terms of total power delivered by the boiler. Comparisons on this basis, showing the performance of the boiler in one case and of the boiler and superheater in the other case, expressed in terms of the equivalent evapo- ration, are shown diagrammatically by fig. 68. It will be seen that even upon this basis the efficiency of the combined boiler and superheater is superior to that of the boiler alone, the increase averaging between 3 and 4 per cent. The reason for this is not entirely apparent. An examination of related data suggests that the lines of fig. 68 ♦Publication No. 66, Carnegie Institution of Washington. 76 SUPERHEATBD ST^AM IN WCOMOTIVe SERVICE. should not be far apart. Draft values plotted in terms of the rate of evapo- ration are lower for the superheating locomotive than for the locomotive using saturated steam, but when these are reduced to equivalent values representing an equal amount of power they are identical for both locomo- tives — a condition which implies equaUty in the fuel lost in the form of cinder and spark. Similar comparisons involving smoke-box temperature lead to identical conclusions. Upon the basis of these statements the relation defined by fig. 68 is not confirmed by collateral evidence. This statement, however, does not discredit 12 HB I \ i II m:m| 10 |i| 9 8 7 6 5 lllll ]iA^^=#ltfriirtlll| fiiJil^ljiffiBM 4 5 : ; 2 1 IIIIIIB^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 100 200 300 400 Fig. 68. — ^Boiler efficiency, the record, which is in fact one of no small significance. The line of perform- ance for the superheating locomotive (fig. 68) depends upon results of 38 tests and that for the saturated-steam locomotive upon results of 40 tests. It is therefore difficult to see how either could have been affected to the extent indicated by any incidental cause or causes. Whatever the conclusion may be with reference to this matter, it is clear that the combined boiler and superheater of Schenectady No. J are not less efficient than the boiler of Schenectady No. 2, while being worked at the same rates of power, and the face value of the data shows its efficiency to be higher by 4 per cent. 40. Comparisons Involving the Performance of the Engine. — The steam consumption per indicated horse-power hour for the superheating locomotive SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 77 as determined by the results of 38 tests has been defined as the hne A B, fig. 56. A similar line based upon the results of 100 tests of the saturated-steam locomotive establishes the cylinder performance of that machine. Replotting the results upon a single sheet gives the diagram, fig. 69. This exhibit (or 50 100 150 200 250 Fig, 69. — Steam per indicated horse-power hour. better, perhaps, the numerical values given by columns 2 and 4, table 5) shows well the saving in water realized by substituting steam superheated approximately 150° F. for steam which is saturated. The saving ranges from 18 per cent when the boiler-pressure is 120 pounds to 9 per cent when the boiler-pressure is 240 pounds. It appears, also, from the diagram that with superheating the least consumption of water, 21.6 pounds per horse- power hour, is secured when the boiler-pressure is approximately 200 pounds. Table 5. — Steam per indicated horse-power hour. Boiler- pressure, (pounds). Saturated steam. Superheated steam. Pounds of steam per indicated horse-power per hour. B. t. u. per indicated horse-power per minute. Pounds of steam per indicated horse-power per hour. B. t. u. per indicated horse-power per minute. 1 3 3 4 5 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 24.7 25.1 25-5 26.0 26.6 27.7 29. 1 483 491 498 507 537 563 22.6 21.8 21.6 21.9 22.3 22 .9 23.8 474 459 455 461 468 481 497 78 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. and that variations in the consumption resulting from changes in pressure are shght (column 4, table 5). For example, the water consumption for all pressures between 160 pounds and 2 20 pounds ranges between 21.6 poimds, the minimum value obtained, and 22.3 pounds, a range of approximately 4 per cent. 600 500 400 300 200 50 100 ISO ZOO S50 Fig. 70. — ^Thermal units consumed per horse-power per minute. IttMWTkijMjjtitL J^T m w S ■ T I ::: :::: IW pilili 1 •i ■:\\ ■ ii^f-fi |l 1 % : !■■ :::: ^m M rrTTTff ^m |li;, m 1 ■ Is mff :!;;;; 1 50 100 150 200 250 Fig. 71. — Coal per indicated horse-power hour. The saving of water in locomotive service is always a matter of moment ; it diminishes the exactions of certain conditions in operation; and in some districts, where water is bad or hard to obtain, it tends to simplify difficult problems either in locomotive maintenance or in the maintenance of the water-supply. The fact, therefore, that superheating affords a material saving in the amount of water required, is not to be overlooked in estimating SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 79 the value of superheating as a practice. But the saving in heat is not pro- portional to the saving in water, for each pound of superheated steam must have more heat imparted to it than a pound of saturated steam at the same pressure. As an indication of the thermal advantage to be derived from the use of superheated steam in comparison with that of saturated steam, it is desirable to reduce the steam in each case to the same thermal basis. This has been shown graphically by fig. 70 and numerically by columns 3 and 5, table 5. Upon this basis the saving effected by the use of superheated steam is 12 per cent when the pressure is 120 pounds, and 2 per cent when the pressure is 240 poimds. Under a boiler-pressure of 180 pounds the substitution of superheated steam improves the efficiency of the engine 9. i per cent. 41. Comparisons Involving the Performance of the Locomotive as a Whole. — The performance of the locomotive as a whole, as expressed in terms of coal consumed per indicated horse-power hour, both for saturated steam and superheated steam, and the saving effected by the substitution of superheated for saturated steam, is given as table 6. These results, since they combine the performance of both engine and boiler, represent a definition of the improvement in the performance of the locomotive experimented upon as the result of the substitution of superheated for saturated steam. They show that the gain is most pronounced at the lower pressure; thus, at a pressure of 120 pounds it is 17 per cent, while at a pressure of 240 pounds it is but 6 per cent. They show also that the performance of the locomotive using superheated steam is only slightly affected by changes of pressure; for the entire range of pressure from 120 pounds to 240 pounds the difference in coal consumption from minimum to maximum is but a third of i pound, while for Table 6. — Saving in coal effected by the use of superheated steam. Pounds of coal per iudi- Saving effected by the use of superheated steam. cated horse-power per hour. Over values obtained Over values obtained Boiler- pressure (pounds). with saturated steam at same pressure. with saturated steam at 180 pounds pressure. Saturated Superheated Pounds per Pounds per steam. steam. I. H. P. per liour. Per cent. 1. H. P. per hour. Per cent. 1 % 3 4 5 6 t 240 3-31 312 0. ig 5-72 0.38 10.86 220 3 37 3.00 37 10 98 50 14.29 200 3 43 2.97 46 13 31 53 15-15 180 3 50 3.01 49 14 00 49 14.01 160 3 59 308 51 14 21 42 12.00 140 3 77 3-17 60 15 98 37 10.57 120 4 00 3-31 69 17 25 19 5-43 8o SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. pressures between 175 pounds and 225 pounds it is practically constant and always near the minimum value. The least coal consumption per indicated horse-power hour, as it appears in the summarized statement, is 2.97 pounds, and was obtained under a steam-pressure of 200 pounds. The results sustain a claim which has been put forward by advocates of the practice of superheating, to the effect that the adoption of such practice permitted the steam-pressure to be materially reduced over that now employed in locomotives using saturated steam without material sacrifice in efficiency. A detailed numerical statement showing the saving in coal resulting from a change from saturated to superheated steam is set forth by columns 4 to 7, table 6. Columns 4 and 5 present results obtained by comparisons based on equal pressures, and columns 6 and 7 those obtained by comparing values obtained with superheating under the several different pressures employed with those obtained from saturated steam at a pressure of 180 pounds. 42. Comparisons Involving the Capacity of the Locomotive. — The maximum power presented by the data derived from the locomotive using superheated steam is not to be accepted as a measure of its capacity. Except in the case of the series of tests run at 160 pounds pressure, the number of tests was insufficient to permit the establishment at each speed of a maximum cut-off 600 500 400 300 200 100 12 3^ Fig. 72. — Indicated horse-power; boiler-pressure 240 pounds. for which the boiler could be made to supply steam. But while direct evi- dence is lacking, the data contain much which goes to show that the super- heating locomotive is a more powerful machine than the locomotive using saturated steam. For example, it has been shown that for the development of equal amounts of power the combined boiler and superheater of the super- SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 8l heating locomotive have an efficiency which equals or exceeds that of the saturated-steam boiler; hence the boiler-power which it may be made to deliver as a maximum equals or exceeds that which the boiler of thesaturated- 600 500 400 300 200 100 II n m m 1 ■■ 1 ;; ■ 1 ! 1 i S ■r 1 1 Ij 'i t : ::::::: :::::: V 1 1 ; ■r ! I fci E - 1 1 i ! 1 1 4 12 3 4 Fig. 73. — Indicated horse-power; boiler-pressure 200 pounds. 600 500 400 300 200 100 n 1 1 -^-H-t- i i i -.1-' :;:rz:" 4,1* 1 i t Mtttt i H h m --H-M- ' i 1 i ■Hff 1:1 :^ 1 llll 1 1 m iSIH I i s + ± 1 ^ p 5 t^ H 3 4 J^:::::: :::::::: iffl ± T T 53 fflff ::i: m^ ±t Mww ;:;M i' ^1 X ii a^ H; : :: m : Iffi a 1 i S ^ s ,, £ :; K i 1 I 12 3 4 5 Fig. 74. — Indicated horse-power; boiler-pressure 160 pounds. Steam locomotive can be made to deliver. But each unit of power delivered from the boiler in the form of superheated steam is more effective in doing work in the cylinders than a similar unit of power delivered in the form of saturated steam; hence, at the limit, the superheating locomotive is more 82 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. powerful than the one using saturated steam, and the difference is that which measures the difference in the economy with which the cyhnders use steam. The same question may be dealt with through another series of facts, as follows: It can be shown that the power of any locomotive is limited by its capacity to burn coal, and coal-burning capacity is a function of the draft. The data show that for the development of a given cylinder power the draft 12 3 4 5 Fig. 75. — Indicated horse-power; boiler-pressure 120 pounds. values of Schenectady No. 3 (superheating) were in all cases less than those of Schenectady No. 2 (saturated). The extent of these differences is well shown by figs. 72 to 75. They are of small value for tests under high pressure, but as a rule they increase as the pressure is reduced. Tests at 160 pounds (fig. 74) show that the power developed in return for a given draft is from 10 per cent to 16 per cent greater for the superheating locomotive than for the saturated-steam locomotive. Obviously there is no reason why the draft for the former should not be increased to limits practicable with the latter, and when this is done the power developed by the superheating locomotive will exceed that which is possible with the saturated-steam locomotive. 43. The Possible Economy which May Result from the Use of Superheated Steam in Locomotive Service. — In the preceding paragraphs an attempt has been made to define with accuracy the increased efficiency resulting from the substitution in locomotive service of steam superheated to approximately 150° for steam which is saturated. The facts upon which comparisons have been based have been derived by careful processes, and the results can safely be accepted as the measure which has been sought. All discussion might well end with the presentation of the facts referred to, were it not that out of SUP^RHEATBD STBAM IN IvOCOMOTIVB SBRVICB. 83 them arises a group of questions of great practical significance. To some of these attention must be given. As a general proposition, the gain which in any service will result from the introduction of a superheater is a function of the degree of superheat employed, and this in turn is limited by the ability of the materials compos- ing the superheater and the exposed parts of the engine to withstand the temperatures which are involved. The Prussian State Railway prescribes a boiler-pressure of 180 pounds and a temperature of steam of 300° C, which temperature may rise above 300°, but must never be allowed to exceed 350°. That is, a degree of superheating of 190° F. is regarded as satisfactory, while the maximum limit never to be exceeded is fixed at 280° F. Under normal ruiming conditions the degree of superheating is considerably above 200° F. Comparing the superheating effects described by these statements with the degree of superheat obtained from the Purdue locomotive when working under a pressure of 180 poxmds (fig. 21), it appears that those of the latter may be increased by at least 33 per cent of their present value without exceeding the limit which has been proved practicable in the every-day practice of German railroads. The means to be employed in securing such a degree of superheat are of course matters of detail which concern the design and pro- portions of the superheater. The savings in water and fuel resulting from the presence of the superheater, as set forth by data already presented, would have been greater had the degree of superheat been higher. In the absence of data derived from experiments it may be assumed that the possible increase in the savings will be proportional to the increase in the degree of superheat. 200 Fig. 76. — Steam per indicated horse-power hour, showing possible gain by increasing superheating 33 per cent. 84 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. On the basis, therefore, of the experimental results already presented and of these statements, the possible gain in water and fuel which may result from the adoption of the superheater is seen by figs. 76 and 77, respectively. 1 |i M 1 ii 1 5 K a m 1 1 $ S 1 Ml i i p w ill m 1 i n f li ^ T 1 ffl 1 I jB: 1 3 M 2 ffi i 1 m 1 ^B 1 II m 1 1 50 lOQ 150 200 250 Fig. 77. — Coal per draw-bar horse-power hour, showing pos- sible gain by increasing superheating 33 per cent. In these figures the upper line A is that of saturated steam as derived from tests of locomotive Schenectady No. 2; the next below, B, is that of super- heated steam as derived from tests of locomotive Schenectady No. 3, and the dotted line C is that which is assumed to represent the performance which Schenectady No. 3 would have given had the degree of superheating been 33 per cent greater than that actually obtained. These are not maximum sav- ings, but are such as are to be expected under normal conditions of continuous full-power operation. From this exhibit it appears that for boiler-pressure of 180 pounds the substitution of superheated steam for saturated steam may result in a reduction of water consumption from 26 pounds to 20.5 pounds, a saving of 2 1 per cent, and in a reduction of coal consumption per draw-bar horse-power of from 4 pounds to 3.25 pounds, a saving of 19 per cent. These values may be accepted as representing what should reasonably be expected of superheating in American locomotive service, so far as the experiments herein described define them. It will be a mistake, however, for anyone to assume that a railway com- pany's bills for locomotive fuel may be diminished by the percentages set forth in the preceding paragraph merely by the introduction of the super- heater. It should be clear, for example, that no part of the fuel used in raising the steam of a locomotive or of its wastes which occur between the SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 85 round-house and the starting of the locomotive at the head of its train can be saved by the appHcation of a superheater to a locomotive. Assuming that the fuel thus used is 15 per cent of the total for the run, a conservative esti- mate, the amount which remains subject to the influence of the superheater is 85 per cent of 19 per cent, or 16 per cent. Again, the fuel used in maintaining a normal temperature of all parts of the machine when the locomotive is at rest at stations and at passing-points is fuel over which the superheater can exert no influence. The amount of fuel thus used is a function of the schedule of the train. The results set forth in Chapter IV show that in some classes of service upon American railways it will be so small as to be negligible, but in other classes of service it will constitute a considerable percentage of the total coal used. A review of Chapter IV will suggest the difficulty which confronts one in an attempt to fix numerical values covering fuel thus to be accounted for. Again, fuel used in generating steam which is discharged through safety-valves can not in any way be affected by the presence of a superheater. In none of the experi- mental work the results of which are recorded in the preceding chapters has there been any loss by safety-valves. This loss in practice is necessarily indefinite. In some classes of service it is so small as to be negligible, and in others it involves a considerable percentage of the total coal used. Finally, attention should be called to the fact that the question at issue involves the whole problem of maintenance. Steam leaking past valves and pistons or coming out by leaky glands or through leaky cylinder-cocks or steam-joints wherever located causes losses which remain undiminished in the presence of the superheater. Summarizing the preceding statements and making such deductions from the known performance of the superheater as will sufiice to remove from the calculations all expenditures of heat normal to the American locomotive which are beyond the influence of the superheater, the actual net reduction in the amount of fuel needed for locomotive use by a railroad having all its locomotives equipped with satisfactory superheaters over that which would be required if all employed saturated steam will be not far from 10 per cent. This value is not to be accepted as of strictly scientific import, but merely as an estimate based upon such facts as have appeared in the course of a rather careful study of the problem. APPENDIX I. THE LOCOMOTIVE EXPERIMENTED UPON. 44. Locomotive Schenectady No. 3 was developed from locomotive No. 2, wluch has been elaborately described and illustrated in connection with an earlier research conducted under the patronage of the Carnegie Institution of Washington.* The changes made were only such as were involved by the addition of a fire-tube superheater to the machine as previously con- FiG. 78. — Outline elevation of locomotive. structed. The changes were matters which concerned the construction of the boiler and the arrangement of the steam-piping; the machinery of the locomotive was not modified in any way. Figs. 78 to 86 illustrate the boiler and superheater of Schenectady No. 3 in detail. 45. The Cole Superheater as applied to the locomotive is well shown in fig. 80. It consists chiefly of a series of return-tubes extending inside of certain of the flues which make up a portion of the water-heating surface. To make room for the superheater the upper central portion of the usual flue-space is taken by sixteen 5 -inch flues, which are reduced to a diameter of 4 inches for 7 inches of their length at the fire-box end and increased to a diameter of 5tV inches at the front tube-sheet. They have a length between flue sheets of 138 inches. In each of these sixteen flues there is an upper and a lower line of superheating tubes. Each line extends from a steam-pipe header in the smoke-box back into its flue to a point near the back tube- sheet, where it meets and is screwed into a return-pipe fitting of special design. From the second of the two openings in this fitting a similar pipe extends forward through the flue and into the smoke-box to a second header, from which branch-pipes lead to the cylinders. All together, there are 32 of these ♦Appendix I, "High Steam-Pressures in Locomotive Service,' Carnegie Institution of Washington. Publication No. 66, 87 88 „s\i^^ne 5^= 89 90 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN IvOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Sec.AA Fig. 81. — Superheater tee-head. Fig. 82. — Superheater header. SUPBRHeATED STBAM IN 1,0C0M0TIVE SERVICE. 91 SEC. AA Fig. 83, — End connections for return superheater tubes. Fig. 84. — Branch-pipes. 92 SUPBRHEATBD STSAM IN LOCOMOTIVB SERVICE. loops. In 13 of the flues the lower loops are 1 16| inches long, extending into the flue within 2 feet 5 inches of the back of the tube-sheet. In the other 3 flues the loops are, respectively, 3 feet, 2 feet, and i foot shorter than the normal. The upper loop in each flue is in all cases approximately 9 inches shorter than the lower loop. The headers to which the pipes of the super- heater connect at the smoke-box end are of cast steel. They have walls three-eighths of an inch thick and are cored in such a manner that all steam passing the throttle-valve must traverse some one of the several loops. In its passage from the boiler the steam leaves the dry-pipe C, fig. 80, and Fig. 86. — Superheater damper cylinder. SUPERHBATSD STBAM IN LOCOMOTIVB SERVICE. 93 passes into the headers through the openings D in the top part of the tee- head. It then flows downward through the passage in one side of this header and passes back toward the fire-box through the 8 tubes which are joined to it. At the castings which form the return bends, its direction is reversed and it passes back through the return tubes to the passage in the other side of the header. It then passes upward into the lower half of the tee-head E, and from there into the branch steam-pipes. 46. The Principal Characteristics of Locomotive Schenectady No. 3 are as follows : Type 4-4-0 Total weight (pounds) 109,000 Weight on four drivers (pounds) 61 ,000 Valves (type, Richardson balance) : Maximum travel (inches) 6 Outside lap (inches) ij Inside lap (inches) o Ports: Length (inches) 12 Width of steam-port (inches) i J Width of exhaust-port (inches) 3 Total wheel-base (feet) 23 Rigid wheel-base (feet) SJ Cylinders: Diameter (inches) 16 Stroke (inches) 34 Drivers, diameter outside of tire (inches) 69J Boiler (type, extended wagon-top) : Diameter of front-end (inches) 52 Length of fire-box (inches) 72 rV Width of fire-box (inches) 34J Depth of fire-box (inches) 79 Number of 2-inch tubes ni Number of 5-inch tubes 16 Length of tubes (feet) 11. 5 Heating-surface in fire-box (square feet) 126 Heating-surface in tubes, water side (square feet) 897 Heating-surface in tubes, fire side (square feet) 817 Total water-heating surface, including water side of tubes (square feet) ... i ,023 Total water-heating surface, including fire side of tubes (square feet) . . . 943 Superheater; type. Cole return-tube: Outside diameter of superheater tubes (inches) i\ Number of loops 32 Average length of tube per loop (feet) 17.27 Total superheating surface based upon outside surface of tubes, surface of headers neglected (square feet) 193 Total water and superheating surface, including water side of boiler-tubes (square feet) 1,216 Total water and superheating surface, including fire side of boiler-tubes (square feet) 1,136 Total water and superheating surface, accepted for use in all computations (square feet) 1,216 Ratio of heating-surface based on water side to that based on fire side i .074 Thickness of crown-sheet (inch) /^ Thickness of tube-sheet (inch) -^^ Thickness of side and back sheet (inch) i Diameter of radial stays (inches) ij Driving-axle journals: Diameter (inches) 7J Length (inches) 8| 94 SUPeRHEATBD STBAM IN I.OCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 47. A Comparison of the Dimensions of the boiler as set forth above with those of Schenectady No. 2, follows. The exhibit shows the extent of the change brought about by the installation of the Cole superheater. Number of 2-inch flues displaced by sixteen s-inch flues, necessary to give place to the superheater 89 Reduction in water-heating surface (square feet) 299 Reduction in water-heating surface (per cent) 22 .6 Heating-surface replaced by the installation of the superheater (square feet) 193 Heating-surface replaced by the installation of the superheater (per cent of surface removed) 64.5 Reduction in total transmitting-surface (water and superheating) (square feet) .... 106 Reduction in total transmitting-surface (water and superheating) (per cent) 8 APPENDIX II. TESTS UNDER CONSTANT CONDITIONS. METHODS AND DATA. 48. The Tests. — All tests the results of which appear in this Appendix were run under a fully open throttle. Four different boiler-pressures were employed, namely, 240, 200, 160, and 120 pounds. At each of these pres- sures tests were run at a speed of 30, 40, and 50 miles per hour, respectively, and at 160 pounds pressure tests were run also at 20 miles per hour. In general, tests were run at several cut-offs for each speed, but only at the pressure of 160 pounds was the series extended throughout the entire possible range. All tests were made on the Purdue University locomotive testing- plant. The methods of testing have been so often described that repetition here seems unnecessary.* Great care was always taken to avoid all occasion for correcting observed data. Leaks, either of water or of steam, were not permitted. 49. Observed and Calculated Data are presented in detail by tables 7 to 27. In these tables each horizontal line represents a test and the several tests are grouped with respect to steam-pressure. The duplicate tests 103a and ma have been included in order to supply the boiler results which were omitted from tests 103 and iii because of inaccuracies in the observed data. The engine results of these duplicates have been omitted because the record of the steam lost from the boiler is unreliable. Heat-balances have been cal- culated for 18 of the tests. The blank spaces in the tables are due to the omis- sion of certain results necessary to the working out of the heat-balance only. An explanation of the several items comprising the tables of Appendix II is as follows : Table 7. — General Conditions. Column I. Test number. Column 2. Laboratory symbol. — The first term of this symbol represents the speed in miles per hour, the second term represents the position of the reverse- lever upon its quadrant expressed in notches from the center forward, and the third represents the steam-pressure. Column 3. Date on which the test was run. Column 4. Duration of the test in minutes. Column 5. Reverse-lever, notch from center forward. Column 6. Position of throttle. — For all tests recorded the throttle was wide open. Column 7. Barometer- pressure, pounds per square inch. ♦"Locomotive Performance.'' John Wiley & Sons, New York City. 95 96 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Column 8. Boiler-pressure by gage. — ^^''alues given in this column are the average of observations made at 5-minute intervals. Column 9. Dry-pipe pressure by gage. — Values given in this column are the average of readings taken at 5-minute intervals. Comparison of values obtained from it with those obtained from the boiler-gage should disclose the drop in pressure between the boiler and cylinder saddle. Column 10. Temperature of laboratory, degrees Fahrenheit, is the average of observations taken at lo-minute intervals. Column II. Temperature by wet-bulb thermometer is the average of readings taken at lo-minute intervals. Column 12. Temperature by dry-bulb thermometer is the average of readings taken at lo-minute intervals. Table 8. — Water and Steam. Column 13. Temperature of feed-water, in degrees Fahrenheit, is the average of readings at lo-minute intervals. Column 14. Water delivered to boiler is the total amount of water weighed, less that lost by injector overflow. A large metal tank, suitably mounted upon scales and connected to the injectors through an auxiliary storage-tank, served as the means for weighing the water. The water lost by the injector overflow was received by a small calibrated barrel upon the subfloor of the laboratory. Column 15. Water lost from boiler includes that discharged by the calori- meter and the loss arising from the circulation around the superheater ther- mometer tubes. The calorimeter loss per hour was: When boiler-pressure was 240 pounds 54 pounds. 200 pounds 43 160 pounds 32 120 pounds 20 The superheater thermometer-plug loss was measured by passing the discharge into a surface-condenser and collecting the condensate in a calibrated tank. Column 16. Steam supplied the engine = column i/^ — column 15. Column 17. Water evaporation, by boiler per hour = column 14 X 60 -r column 4. Column 18. Steam supplied theengine per hour = column 16 X 60 H- column 4. Column 19. Quality of steam in dome. — This was determined by a throttling calorimeter attached close to the dome. It was carefully insulated to prevent loss by radiation. Column 20. Temperature of steam by thermometer was measured by ther- mometers placed in the branch-pipes at the point where they join the super- heater header. The values given are the averages of readings taken at 5-minute intervals. Column 2 1 . Degrees superheat = column 20 — the temperature correspond- ing to saturated steam at the pressure shown by column 8. Table 9. — Speed and Coal. Column 22. Total revolutions is the difference between the initial and final reading of the engine register. Readings were taken as the test proceeded at 5-minute intervals. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 97 Column 23. Revolutions per minute = column 22 -7- column 4. Column 24. Miles equivalent to total revolutions = column 22 times the cir- cumference of drivers in feet -7- 5280 = column 22 -h 292.31. Column 25. Miles per hour = column 24 X 60 -i- column 4. Column 26. Kind of coal. — ^Two kinds of coal were used for the tests, Pocahontas and Youghiogheny. The chemical and physical characteristics of these coals are given elsewhere (tables 14 and 15). Column 27. Dry coal fired.— 'Ry dry coal is meant coal free from both surface and inherent moisture. The surface moisture was determined by placing a sample of the coal in an oven through which air heated 20° or 30° above the atmosphere was passed for 10 hours. The inherent moisture was determined in connection with approximate analysis for 2 1 tests, the average value for which was assumed to hold good for the remaining ones. Column 28. Refuse. — The ash and the refuse caught in the ash-pan at the end of the test results not only from firing during the test, but from the firing before as well. In order, therefore, to make the proper corrections, those values in this column for all tests involving a heat-balance were calculated in the following manner : Let o represent the weight of coal fired in raising steam-pressure and maintaining it until the locomotive was started. b, the weight of coal fired from the time the locomotive was started until the time the test started. c, the weight of coal fired during the test. d, the refuse removed from theash-pan just before the engine started. e, the refuse removed from the ash-pan during and after the test. /, the per cent of combustible in the refuse removed before the test started. g, the per cent of combustible in the refuse removed during and after the test. As no forced draft, but natural draft only, was used up to the time the locomotive started, and an examination of the smoke-box showed it to be free from cinders just before the locomotive started, the weight of refuse from coal a was calculated by the formula „. . . r r per cent chemical ash in coal a X coal a Weight of refuse = -— ; -. — -. — t—. j -. 7, per cent chemical ash in refuse (100 — /) Let h represent the value derived from this formula; then the weight of refuse in the fire-box when the locomotive is started is h — d. If the per cent of combustible in refuse / and g are the same, this weight can be subtracted from e to obtain the amount of refuse rejected during the time of the test, but since / is generally considerably greater than g, the following method of correction was adopted. Weight of refuse = (h— d) ' 100— g In addition, the weight of the refuse from coal 6 was subtracted from the weight of refuse e. This weight of refuse = b + c (. 100 98 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Or, making one formula, the final corrected weight of refuse = ( loo — g) 6 + c ( loo — g) Column 29. Combustible fired. — Column 27 X (column 75 + column 76) -T- (100 — column 74). Column 30. Combustible consumed = column 29 — the sum of the weights of the combustible in the cinders caught in the front-end, the combustible in the sparks ejected from the stack, and combustible in the refuse from the ash-pan. Column 31. Dry coal per hour = column 27 X 60 -^ column 4. Column 32. Dry coal per mile run = column 27 -r- column 24. Tablb 10. — COAI,. Column 33. Dry coal per square foot of grate-surface per hour = column 31-^17- Colum/n 34. Dry coal per square foot of water and superheating surface per hour = column 31 -=-1216. Column 35. Combustible fired per square foot of water and superheating surface per hour = column 29 X 60 -h column 4 X 1216. Column 36. Combustible consumed per square foot of water and super- heating surf ace per hour = column 30X 60-H column 4X 12 16. Column 37. Cinders caught in front-end per hour. — Since the cinders caught in the smoke-box include those deposited there before and after as well as during the test, those values in this column which involve a heat-balance were calculated as follows : Let a represent the time the engine ran before and after the test. b, the average draft during the time a. c, the duration of the test in hours. d, the average draft during the test. e, the weight of cinders removed after engine stopped. /, the weight of cinders caught during the test. Then, 0> c + (^> Tests for which heat-balances only were made were subject to the foregoing correction. Column 38. Sparks from the stack per hour were measured by the aid of a cinder-trap operated throughout the entire test. The trap consists of an inverted U-shaped tube mounted as shown in fig. 87. The cage 6 is a closed cylinder, the sides of which are constructed of wire gauze so fine that while the gases may easily escape the sparks which pass through the tube are retained. The trap may be placed in any one of the five positions shown on the diagram. In calculating the total weight of sparks ejected it was assumed that the rate of discharge, as measured at the several positions of the tube, was true only for the annular areas represented by these positions. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 99 Fig, 87. — Cinder-trap, Column 39. Draft in the smoke-box was measured in the front-end at 'a point in front of the diaphragm. It is expressed in inches of water and is the average of readings at 5-minute intervals. Column 40. Smoke-box temperature was measured by a high-grade mercury thermometer. The values given are the average of readings at lo-minute intervals. Table loa — Comparative values 0/ Pocahontas and Y oughii )ghen} coal. Bquivalent evaporation Equivalent evaporation per pound of dry coal Factor express- per pound of dry coal (Pocahontas coal). (Youghiogheny coal). Test No. Laboratory efficiency of the two quali- ties of coal. symbol. In the boiler. In the boiler and In the In the boiler and superheater. superheater. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 107 30-2-200 905 9.72 1.06 9-54 10.24 108 30-4-200 8 20 8 88 06 8 67 9 35 113 50-4-200 7 19 7 82 16 8 35 9 07 "7 20-8-160 7 96 8 ,'i6 12 8 93 9 60 118 30-2-160 9 78 10 46 03 10 23 10 46 122 40-2-160 9 99 10 65 04 10 43 10 65 126 50-2-160 9 60 10 19 04 10 03 10 19 127 50-4-160 8 33 8 98 07 8 88 9 58 131 30-10-120 7 30 7 95 19 8 66 9 42 132 30-14-120 6 38 6 98 24 8 10 8 86 133 40-4-1 20 9 64 10 24 03 9 98 10 58 134 40-8-1 20 8 25 8 95 10 9 10 9 88 135 40-12-120 6 48 7 10 25 8 II 8 89 136 50-8-120 8 38 9 10 15 9.69 10.51 lOO SUPERHBATBD STBAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. ■ While in the data of table loa, on page 99, all facts are given as observed, there are elsewhere presented certain analyses in the course of which the evaporative efficiency obtained from the Pocahontas coal has been expressed in terms of an equivalent evaporation per pound of dry Youghiogheny coal. The manner of making such changes was suggested by the study of the various heat losses included in the heat-balance. It was noticed that these were prac- tically the same for the two coals, except for the cinder-loss, which was greater for the Pocahontas coal. The diffierence in each case was added to the ratio representing the efficiency of the boiler, to give values for the efficiency such as would have resulted had Youghiogheny coal been used. The multiplier thus obtained is given in column 5 of table loa. Tabi,^ II. — Boiler Performance. Coluvin 4.1. Water evaporated per square foot of water and superheating surf ace per hour = column 17-=- 12 16. Column 42 . Water evaporated per pound of dry coal = column 1 7 -J- column 3 1 . Column 43. Equivalent evaporation per hour by boiler = column 17 X col- umn 54 -H 965.8. Column 44. Equivalent evaporation per hour by the superheater = column 17 X column 55^965.8. Column 45. Equivalent evaporation per hour by boiler and superheater — column 43 -|- column 44. Column 46. Equivalent evaporation per hour per square foot of water-heating surface = column 43-^1023. Column 47. Equivalent evaporation per hour per square foot of superheating surface = column 44^193. Column 48. Equivalent evaporation per hour per square foot of water and superheating surface = column 45 -=-12 16. Column 49. Ratio of heat absorbed per square foot of superheating surface to that absorbed per square foot of water-heating surface = column 47 -=- column 46. Column 50. Equivalent evaporation per square foot of grate-surface per hour = column 45 -M 7. Column 51. Equivalent evaporation per pound of dry coal by the boiler = column 43 -=- column 31. Column 52. Equivalent evaporation per pound of dry coal by superheater = column 44 -^ column 3 1 . Column 53. Equivalent evaporation per pound of dry coal by boiler and super- heater = column 45 -=- column 3 1 . Table 12. — Boiler Performance (Continued). Column 54. B. t. u. taken up by each pound of water in the boiler = q—q^-{-xr. Column 55. B. t. u. taken up by each pound of steam in superheater = c (t— t^} + r (i—x). The values for specific heat of steam care those recommended by Professor Carpenter.* Column 56. B. t. u. taken up by each pound of water in boiler and super- heater = column 54 -I- column 55. ♦Proceedings A. S. M. E., vol. 28, No. ^, p. 278. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. lOI Column 57. B. t. u. taken up by boiler per -minute = column 17 X column 54-=- 60. Column 58. B. t. u. taken up by superheating per minute = column 17 X column 55 -h 60. Column 59. B. t. u. taken up by boiler and superheater per m,inute = column 57 + column 58. Column 60. B.t.u. taken up by boiler and superheater per pound of dry coal = column 42 X column 56. Column 61. B. t. u. taken up by boiler and superheater per pound of com,- bustible fired = column 59 X column 4^ column 29. Column 62. B. t. u. taken up by boiler and superheater per 100 B. t. u. in dry coal = 100 (column 60 -=- column 87). Column 63. B. t. u. taken up by boiler and superheater per 100 B. t. u. in combustible consumed = 100 X column 59 X column 4 ~- column 30 X col- umn 88. Column 64. Boiler horse-power = column 45-7-34.5. Table 13. — Chemical Analysis of Smoke-Box Gases. The gas analyses were made with an Orsat apparatus, using the usual solutions of caustic potash, pyrogallol, and cuprous chloride for the absorption of CO2, O2, and CO, respectively. Fig. 88. — Smoke-box gas-sampling apparatus. The sampling-tube, located as shown in fig. 88, was a f-inch copper tube having 7 small holes, approximately 0.05-inch in diameter, spaced 4 inches apart. The end of the tube was plugged. A small steam-aspirator g was used to draw the gas from the smoke-box. The gas was first passed through 102 SUPBRHEATBD ST^AM IN I^OCOMOTIVE SERVICE. a bottle contaiijingiotton to free it from cinders and moisture; it then passed through a Hne containing two 3-way cocks, d and e, to a mercury seal, and finally through a steam-aspirator g to the atmosphere. Lead tubing was used from the sampling-tube to the mercury seal, excepting where apparatus was joined by heavy rolled-rubber tubing. Two 3-way cocks were provided in order that both instantaneous and continuous samples could be collected simultaneously. This was done for the first tests, and the results were found to check very closely. Fresh solutions were made for each test. On the longest test, of 2 hours 30 minutes duration, from 10 to 12 samples were analyzed. On the shorter tests both instantaneous and continuous samples were analyzed to insure correct results. Although the holes in the sampling-tube were very small, they did not cause any trouble by clogging up if cleaned before each test. The rate of flow in the tube was always so well controlled by the steam-aspirator that the gas samples could be drawn very readily, even though there were 5 or 6 inches of draft in the smoke-box. Column 65. CO2, per cent. Column 66. O2, per cent. Column 6j. CO, per cent. Column 68. N, per cent. Column 69. Weight of dry gas per pound of carbon consumed = iiC02 + 802 + 7(CO + N) 3(C02 + CO) Column 70. Dry gas per pound of combustible fired = per cent Cin com- bustible (based on combustible consumed) X column 69-^-Ioo. Column 71. Air per pound of carbon consumed = N-;- 0.33 (CO2 -f- CO). Column 72. Air per pound of combustible fired= per cent C in combustible (based on combustible consumed) X column 71 -7-100. Column 73. Ratio of air supplied to theoretical requirement = column 68 -r N (column 68— 3.78 X column 66) = ,-1 — :r-. JN — 3.78O2 Tabids 14. — Chemicai, Anai^ysis op Coal. During the test a shovelful of coal was taken from each wheelbarrow as a sample. At the end of the test these samples were crushed and quartered down to about 10 pounds. This was placed in a large sheet-iron tray in an oven in which air, heated about 30° or 40° above the surrounding atmosphere, was passed over it. About 8 or 10 hours were sufiScient to drive off the surface moisture. The proximate and ultimate analyses were made at the laboratory of the fuel testing plant of the United States Geological Survey at St. lyouis, Missouri. Proximate analysis of coal as fired. Column 74. Moisture, per cent. Column 75. Volatile matter, per cent. Column 76. Fixed carbon, per cent. Column 77. Ash, per cent. SUPERHBATED STEAM IN I^OCOMOTIVB SERVICE. I03 Ultimate analysis of dry coal. Column 78. Carbon, per cent. Column 79. Hydrogen, per cent. Column 80. Oxygen, per cent. Column 8 1 . Nitrogen, per cent. Column 82. Sulphur, per cent. Column 83. Ash, per cent. Table 15. — Calorific Values. A determination of the calorific value of the coal, calorific value of the front-end cinders and the percentage of ash contained in them, the calorific value of the stack cinders and the percentage of ash contained, the percentage of ash in the refuse removed before the test, and the percentage of ash in the refuse removed during the test was made from samples submitted to the fuel-testing laboratory of the United States Geological Survey at St. lyouis. A Mahler bomb calorimeter was used in the work. Column 84. Per cent of combustible in front-end cinders. Column 85. Per cent of comhustible in stack cinders. Column 86. Per cent of combustible in refuse from ash pan. Column 87. B. t. u. per pound of dry coal. Column 88. B. t. u. per pound of combustible = colutnn 87 X (100 — column 74) -^ (column 75 -1- column 76). Column 89. B. t. u. per pound of front-end cinders. Column 90. B. t. u. per pound of stack cinders. Column 91. B. t. u. per pound of refuse from ash-pan. Table 16. — Heat-Balance. Column 92. Calorific value in B. t. u. per pound of combustible. Column 93. B. t. u. absorbed per pound of combustible fired = column 59 X column 4-=- column 29. Column 94. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to water in coal = — \ (212 -—t)-\-r-\-c (T — 212) r , where 100 t = temperature of laboratory, a = per cent of moisture referred to combustible, T = temperature of smoke-box gases, r — latent heat of steam at atmospheric pressure, c = the specific heat of steam at constant pressure. Column 95. B. t. u. per pound of combustible due to water in air = per cent of moisture in the air X column 72 X 0.48 (column 40 —column 10). Column 96. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to water formed by hydrogen in the coal = per cent of hydrogen referred to combustible -=- 100 X 9X {(212 —column 10) -f 965.8 -f 0.48 X (column 40 — 212)} . Column 97. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to escaping gases = column 70 X 0.24 X (column 40 —column 10). Column 98. B. t. u. per pound of combustible due to incomplete combustion = CO X per cent C in combustible X 10 150 ,^„ „„, 100 I04 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Column 99. B. t. u. per pound of combtcstible due to front-end cinders = (column 37 X column 89 X column 4) -j- (column 29 X 60). Column 100. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to stack cinders = (column 38 X column 90 X column 4) -=- (column 29 X 60). Column loi. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to refuse in ash-pan = column 28 X column 91 -^ column 29. Column 102. B. t. u. unaccounted for = column 92 — the sum of all calcu- lated losses + heat absorbed by boiler and superheater. This item includes that due to radiation. Tabi,e 17. — Heat-Balance. Colum,n 103. Per cent of heat absorbed by boiler and superheater = 100 X column 93 -i- column 92. Column IQ4. Per cent of heat lost due to water in coal = 100 X column 94 H- column 92. Column 105. Per cent of heat lost dtw to water in air = 100 X column 95 -i- column 92. Column 106. Per cent of heat lost due to water formed by hydrogen in coal = 100 X column 96 -h column 92. Column 107. Per cent of heat lost due to escaping gases = 100 X column 97 -~ column 92. Coluinn 108. Per cent of heat lost due to incomplete combustion = 100 X column 98 H- column 92. Column 109. Per cent of heat lost due to front-end cinders = 100 X columa 99 -J- column 92. Column 1 10. Per cent of heat lost due to stack cinders = 100 X column 100 -r- column 92. Colum,n III. Per cent of heat lost due to refuse in ash-pan = 100 X column loi -T- column 92. Colunnn 112. Per cent of heat lost unaccounted for =100 X column 102-=- column 92. — Table 18. — ^EvEnts op Stroke from Indicator-cards. The indicator work received careful attention. In all cases two instru- ments were used on each cylinder. A short nipple and elbow constituted the only piping between the indicator and the cylinder. The drum motion was positive and provided a reciprocating-bar which moved just behind the drum of the indicators, permitting action from the shortest possible length of cord. All events of stroke and all pressures represent average values as determined from indicator-cards taken at lo-minute intervals. Colum,ns 113 to 117. Adm,ission. Columns 118 to 122. Cut-off. Table 19. — Events op Stroke (Continued). Columns 123 to 127. Release. Columns 128 to 132. Compression. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN U)COMOTIVB SERVICE. IO5 Table 20. — Pressures from Indicator-cards. Columns 133 to 137. Initial pressure. Columns 138 to 142. Pressure at cut-off. Table 21. — Pressures from Indicator-cards (Continued). Columns 143 to 147. Pressure at release. Columns 148 to 152. Pressure at compression. Table 22. — Pressures from Indicator-cards (Continued). Columns 153 to 157. Least hack pressure. Columns 158 to 162. Mean effective pressure. Table 23. — Engine Performance. Columns 163 fo 167. Indicated horse-power. — The power was calculated by the use of a constant based upon the accurately determined dimensions of the engine and representing the horse-power, assuming the engine to make I revolution per minute in response to i pound mean effective pressure. These horse-power constants are as follows : Right side. Left side. TT i ^ (Headend 0.01222 0.0124.'; Horse-power constants -^ i, J o^ --'.•ji^^j ^ (Crank end 01186 .01207 The power for each cylinder-end was determined by multiplying the horse- power constant by the average mean effective pressure for a test, columns 158 to 162, and by the revolution per minute, column 23. Column 168. Steam per indicated horse-power per hour by tank. This is column 1 8-=- column 167. Column 169. Steam, per indicated horse- power per hour by indicator = (column 184— column 189) X 60 X column 23-=- column 167. Column 170. Pounds of saturated steam per indicator horse-power equivalent to steam actually used = column 168 X (column 56 + g'o)-i-^. Column 171. B. t. u. supplied engine per minute = column 56 X column 18H-60. Column 172. B. t. u. supplied engine per minute, assuming temperature of feed to have been equal to temperature of exhaust = column 18 (column 56 + i — 32 — g) -=- 60, where t is the temperature of feed-water and q the heat in i pound of water at a temperature corresponding to the least back-pressure. Column 173. B. t. u. per indicated horse-power per mAnute = column 171 -^ column 167. Column 174. B. t. u. per indicated horse-power per minute on the assumption that the temperature of the feed was equal to the temperature of the exhaust = column 172 -^-167. Table 24. — Steam shown by Indicator. In determining the weight of steam present in the engine cylinder at any point in the stroke, three factors must be known, namely, the volume occupied by the steam in question, its pressure, and its weight per unit-volume. The io6 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. constants for volumes employed in determining the weight of steam shown by indicator, as determined from accurate measurements, are as follows : End. Piston displacement in cubic feet. Cylinder clear- ance, per cent of piston displacement. Right side. Left side . . Head. Crank Head. Crank 2 . 8020 2.7196 2 . 8486 2 . 7660 7-44 7.98 7-34 763 The volume for any point in the stroke was found by adding the per- centage of that portion of whole stroke which the piston had passed over to reach the point in question (columns 118 to 132), to the percentage of clearance and multiplying by the piston displacement. The pressure above atmosphere at the several points in the stroke to be investigated appears in columns 138 to 152. The weight per unit- volume corresponding to this pressure was found from Peabody's steam tables. Columns 175 to 179. Pounds of steam shown by indicator at cut-off. — The values given are the average of those obtained from indicator-cards taken at lo-minute intervals. Columns 180 to 184. Pounds of steam shown by indicator at release. — ^The values given are the average of those obtained from indicator-cards at 10- minute intervals. Table 25. — Cylinder Performance. Columns 185 to 189. Pounds of steam, shown by the indicator at the beginning of compression. — The values shown are the average of those obtained from indicator-cards taken at lo-minute intervals. Column 1 90 . Weight of steam per revolution by tank = column 1 6 -=- column 2 2 . Column 191. Weight of mixture in cylinder per revolution = column 190 + column 189. Column 192. Per cent of mixture present as steam at cut-off = 100 X column 179 -=- column 191. Column 193. Per cent of mixture present as steam, at release = (100 X column 184) -i- column 191. Column 194. Reevaporation or condensation per revolution — column 179 — column 184. Values representing the condensation are designated by the minus sign. Colum,n 195. Reevaporation or condensation per indicated horse-power per hour = column 194 X 60 X column 23 -=- column 167. Table 26. — Performance of the Locomotive as a Whole. Column 196. Draw-bar pull. — The values given are the average of observa- tions made from a traction dynamometer at 5-minute intervals. Column 197. Dynamometer horse-power. — ^To aid in calculating dynamom- eter horse-power, a constant was employed representing the horse-power which would be developed if the drivers were to revolve i revolution a minute and the locomotive were to exert i pound pull at the draw-bar. A factor in SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 107 the detennination of this constant is the circumference of the drivers, which, by accurate measurement, was found to be 18.063 feet. Upon this basis the dynamometer horse-power constant is K = 0.000547. The values in this column are, therefore, column 196 X column 23 X K. Column 198. Machine friction in terms of mean effective pressure = column 162 — M. E. P. equivalent to the pounds pull at the draw-bar, column 196. Column 199. Machine friction, per cent of indicated horse-power = (100 X column 198) -H column 162. Column 200. Machine friction horse-power = column 199 X column 167 -7- 100. Colum/n 201. Steam, per dynamometer horse-power hour = column 18 -^ column 197. Column 202. Coal per dynamometer horse-power per hour = column 31 -i- column 197. Column 203. Coal per indicated horse-power hour =^ column 31 -=-columni67. Table 27. — Performance of the Locomotive as a Whole, assuming Irregularities IN THE Results of iNcrviDUAL Tests to have been Eliminated. Column 204. Equivalent steam to engine per hour, feed-water at a temperature of 60° F. = column 18 X (column 56 + column 13 — 60) -H 965.8. Column 205. Equivalent evaporation per pound of dry coal, assuming the evaporative efficiency of the boiler to have been represented by the equation E = 11.706 — 0.214 //, where E is the equivalent evaporation per pound of coal and H is the rate of evaporation per foot of water and superheating surface per hour. For values in question, H = column 204 -;- 12 16. Column 206. Dry coal fired per hour, assuming the evaporative efficiency to be that shown by the equation = column 204 -^ column 205. Column 207. Dry coal per indicated horse-power hour = column 206-=- col- umn 167. Column 208. Equivalent steam per indicated horse-power hour= column 204 -r- column 167. Column 209. Machine friction in terms of mean effective pressure. — The purpose of this column i^ to eliminate irregularities in action due to variations in lubrication, etc. The values given are those determined by the previous experimental work upon Schenectady No. 2.* Column 2 10. Machine friction horse-power is the power equivalent, assuming the friction M. E. P. to have been that shown by column 209. Column 211. Machine friction, per cent of indicated horse-power = 100 X column 210-7- column 167. Column 212. Dynamometer horse-power = column 167 — column 210. Column 213. Draw-bar pull= 33,000 X colmnn 212 .^(18.063 X column 23). ^Column 214. Coal per dynamometer horse-power hour = coXvann 206 -h col- umn 212. Column 215. Equivalent steam per dynamometer horse-power per hour= col- umn 204 -i- column 212. *"High Steam-Pressures in Locomotive Service,'' Publication No. 66, Carnegie Institution of Washington. io8 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 7. — General conditions. Designation of tests. Laboratory symbol. « t", Sod 8 9>' £■ Q 5CJ e-5 10 3-" III a-" ^< -i +j E^'i S-oE 11 12 lOI 102 103 103a 104 105 106 30-2-240 30-4-240 30-5-240 30-5-240 40—2—240 40—4-240 50-2-240 May- June July June May May June 27, 7, 22, 6, 28, 20, 5, Min. 120 120 95 65 85 100 60 Wide open Do.. . Do... Do.. . Do., . Do... Do.. . Lbs. Lbs. 241 .0 238.9 234-3 236.6 236.4 239-7 235-8 Lbs. 237 236 225 234 231 235 231 "F. 77.80 81.80 92.30 88.10 79.10 81.50 85-40 "F. 58.4 74-2 66.2 77-8 83 80 6i 81 107 io8 109 no III IIIO 112 113 30-2-200 30-4-200 30-6-200 40-2-200 40-4-200 40-4-200 40-6-200 50-4-200 Mar. Apr. Apr. Apr. July June Apr. Apr. 150 150 150 130 95 120 150 50 .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. 200. 1 200.5 200.2 200.4 200. 1 199.4 200.0 201 . 1 196 198 199 198 193 199 198 198 72 .90 72.50 79-30 73.20 86.30 86.70 84.50 75 20 73 54 65 55 77- 78. 66, 114 115 u6 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 20-2-160 20-4-160 20-6-160 20-8-160 30-2-160 30-4-160 30-6-160 30-8-160 40-2-160 40-4-160 40-6-160 40-8-160 50-2-160 50-4-160 50-6-160 Nov. Nov. Nov. Jan. Feb. June Dec. Apr. Feb. Nov. May Dec. Feb. Feb. Dec. 15, 12, 26, II) I, 5, 3. 29. 4, 23, 3, 14, 8, II, 17, 06 180 06 150 06 150 07 150 07 150 07 i.SO 06 150 07 150 07 1,50 06 150 07 I,=iO 06 150 07 60 07 60 06 40 .Do., .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. ■ Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. 160.2 160.5 159-9 159-5 160.8 160.2 160.4 i6o. I i6i . I 159-9 160.0 160.4 161 .2 160.4 161 .4 160 159 158 160 159 159 79-30 75-13 76-13 72 .00 73-37 2 .40 8-93 73-90 75-09 73,60 72,90 83.00 70.20 69.80 68.50 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 30-4- -120 30-8- -120 30-10- -120 30-14- -120 40-4- -120 40-8- -120 40-12- -120 50-8- -120 Mar. May Feb. Feb. Mar. Mar. Feb. Mar. II. 31, 15. 18, 15. 4. 22, 150 4 150 8 120 10 120 14 150 4 150 8 90 12 60 8 .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. .Do. 120.2 120.2 119-9 120.2 120. 1 120,3 120.6 120.6 Ii8 120 119 119 120 118 117 73-50 68.40 78.40 76.90 73-00 75-50 77-10 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 109 Table 8. — Water and steam. Designation of tests. Water and steam. No. Laboratory symbol. Tem- pera- ture of feed- water. Water delivered to boiler. Water lost from boiler. Steam supplied engine. Water evaporated by boiler per hour. Steam supplied engine per hour. Quality of steam in dome. Tempera- ture of steam by ther- mometer. Degrees super- heat. 13 15 16 17 18 20 lOI 102 103 1030 104 105 106 30-2-240 30-4-240 30-5-240 30-5-240 40-2-240 40-4-240 50-2-240 61.8 60.2 71.6 62.0 60.5 59-6 59- 1 Lbs. 17,600 21,316 18,619 i3>752 13.056 20,150 10,178 Lbs. 275 238 285 1 96 560 139 Lbs. 17.325 21,078 18,334 12,860 19.590 10,038 Lbs. 8,800 10,658 11,759 12,698 9,214 12,090 10,178 Lbs. 8,662 10,539 11,580 9.078 11.758 10,038 0.989 .990 989 990 990 989 989 °F. 540 554 549 552 528 556 543 137-8 152.5 149. 1 151-3 127-3 153-9 142.7 107 30-2-200 55 I 108 30-4-200 57 6 109 30-6-200 57 2 no 40-2-200 58 2 III 40-4-200 70 I ma 40-4-200 59 9 112 40-6-200 55 3 "3 50-4-200 59 I 16,754 21,312 26,448 15.638 15,837 20,266 30.205 8,372 .677 617 682 611 251 662 234 16,077 20,695 25.766 15.027 15.586 29.543 8,138 6,702 8,525 10,579 7.217 10,002 10,133 12,082 10,038 6.431 8,278 10,306 6,938 9.844 11,817 9.766 991 519 3 131. 6 991 539 9 152. 1 992 5,'i6 8 169. 1 992 526 3 138-4 992 540 5 152-9 992 540 152.6 993 565 2 177-5 991 547 4 159 -4 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 20-2-160 20—4—160 20-6-160 20-8-160 30-2-160 30-4-160 30-6-160 30-8-160 40-2-160 40-4—160 40-6-160 40-8-160 50-2-160 50-4-160 50-6-160 59-7 60.5 55-2 55-0 56-0 62.7 54-5 56.9 56-0 54-8 57-2 62 .0 56.0 540 54-4 14,061 13.983 17,703 21,297 13.145 16,586 21,834 26,123 13.940 18,896 23.432 30.836 5.510 7.858 8,309 498 222 422 378 609 229 422 585 496 423 399 474 272 237 131 13,563 13.761 17,281 20,919 12,536 16,357 21,412 25,538 13.444 18,473 23.033 '30,362 5,238 7,621 8,178 4.687 5.594 7,082 8,519 5.258 6,634 8,733 10,449 5.576 7.558 9,372 12,334 5.510 7.858 12,463 4.521 5,504 6,913 8,367 5,014 6,543 8.565 10,214 5,378 7,389 9,213 12,145 5,238 7,621 12,267 993 993 992 993 992 995 993 996 992 993 995 993 994 992 993 495 504 524 515 495 512 533 543 494 524 535 550 489 523 585 125.0 133-4 153-8 145 -I 125.0 141.9 162 .9 172.9 123.4 154-0 164.9 180.1 118. 1 152.5 214. 1 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 30-4-1 20 30-8-1 20 30-10-120 30-14-120 40-4-1 20 40-8-120 40-12-120 50-8-120 54 6 62 9 54 1 58 55 5 59 58 58 1 1 ,604 470 19,475 160 18,415 330 23,664 320 12,231 445 21.755 430 18,483 250 9.538 170 II. 134 19.315 18,085 23.344 11,786 21,325 18,233 9.368 4,642 7,790 9,208 11,832 4,892 8,702 12,322 9.538 4.454 7.726 9.043 11,672 4.714 8,530 12,156 9,368 994 994 993 995 994 994 994 993 467 505 524 541 470 520 540 519 117. 1 156.2 174-9 191-4 120.8 170.6 190.3 169. 1 no SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 9. — Speed and coal. Besignation of tests. Speed. Coal. No, Laboratory symbol. II So . 3-° hi No, Laboratory symbol. Si ■3 a g >> St 5.8.S w w S " 0_j am II Hi m cq n Ph P-i fu n c^ ^ (1, £ ■ 1 Z 41 4a 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 so 51 BZ S3 Lbs. Lftj. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. lOI 30-2-240 7.24 7.48 10,623 849 11,472 10.39 4.40 9-43 42-55 674.9 9-03 0.72 9-15 I02 30-4-240 8 77 6.68 12,889 II18 14,007 12.60 5-79 II 52 45-95 824.0 8 .08 •71 8 ■79 103 30-5-240 103a 30-5-240 10 44 6'. 56 15.326 1322 16,648 14.98 6.85 13 69 45-72 979-4 7 88 .68 8 ■56 104 40-2-240 7 58 7.12 11,141 820 11,961 10.89 4-25 9 83 39-00 703-7 8 61 •63 9 24 105 40-4-240 9 ■94 6.59 14,620 1289 15,909 14.29 6.67 13 08 46.68 935-8 7 97 .70 8 67 106 50-2-240 8 37 7.28 12,308 1013 13.322 12.03 5-24 lio 96 43-56 783.8 8 80 ■72 _9 52 107 30-2-200 5 51 7.48 8,114 591 8.705 7-93 3-05 7 16 38.46 512. 1 9 05 -67 9 72 108 30-4-200 7 01 6.79 10,300 859 11,159 10.07 4-45 9 17 44.19 656.4 8 20 .68 8 88 109 30-6-200 8 70 6.85 12,795 I166 13,961 12.51 6.04 II 47 48.28 821.3 8 29 -75 9 04 no 40-2-200 5 93 7-65 8,721 660 9.381 8.53 3-42 7 71 40. 10 551-8 9 24 .70 9 94 III 40-4-200 ma 40-4-220 8 41 6.61 12,225 IOI5 13.240 11-95 5-26 10 89 44.02 778.9 7 89 .66 8 55 112 40-6-200 9 94 7 03 14.647 1384 16,031 14-32 7.18 13 18 50.14 943-1 8 53 .81 9 34 "3 50-4-200 8 25 596 12,114 1056 13,170 11.84 5-47 10 82 46.20 774-8 7 19 ■63 J_ 82 114 20-2-160 3 85 7.12 5.633 366 5,999 5-50 1.89 T 88 34-37 352.9 8 56 ■56 9 10 "5 20-4-160 4 60 7-44 6,719 469 7,188 6-57 2-43 5 91 36.98 422.8 8 94 .62 9 56 116 20-6-160 5 82 7. II 8,542 680 9,222 8-35 3-54 7 58 42-38 542-5 8 58 .68 9 26 "7 20-8-160 7 00 6.59 10,281 771 11,052 10.05 3-99 9 09 39-74 650.2 7 96 .60 8 56 118 30-2-160 4 32 8. II 6,337 418 6,755 6. ig 2.17 5 56 35-06 397-3 9 78 ■63 10 46 119 30-4-160 5 46 7.81 7,967 575 8,542 7-79 2.98 7 02 38-25 502.5 9 38 .68 10 06 120 30-6-160 7 18 6.43 10,544 881 11,425 10.30 4-56 9 40 44-30 672 . 1 8 30 -69 8 99 121 30-8-160 8 59 7-43 12,620 1084 13,704 12.33 5-61 II 27 45-50 806.2 8 97 ■77 9 74 122 40-2-160 4 59 8.29 6,720 462 7,162 6.57 2.29 5 89 34-85 421-3 9 99 .69 10 65 123 40-4-160 6 22 6,99 9,122 435 9,557 8.92 3-76 7 86 42.16 562.2 8 45 -40 8 85 124 40-6-160 7 71 7-31 ".309 938 12,247 11-05 4.86 10 07 44.00 720.4 8 82 -73 9 55 125 40-8-160 10 15 741 14.795 1372 16,166 14.46 7. II 13 29 49.16 951 -I 8 89 .83 9 72 126 50-2-160 4 53 7-95 6,650 407 7,057 6.50 2. II 5 80 32-47 415-0 9 60 -59 10 19 127 50-4-160 6 46 6.90 9,486 752 10,238 g.27 3-90 8 41 42.06 602.3 8 33 -65 8 98 128 50-6-160 10 25 6.81 15,049 1630 16,679 14.72 8-44 13. 71 57-30 981.2 8 22 .90 _9_ 12 129 30-4-120 3 82 8.62 5,578 335 5,913 5-45 1-73 4 86 31-75 347-8 lO 36 .62 10 98 130 30-8-120 6 41 7.88 9.295 735 10,030 9-09 3-81 8 25 41.90 590.0 9 41 ■75 10 16 131 30-10-120 7 57 6.08 11,061 975 12,036 10.81 5-05 9 90 46-72 708.1 7 30 •65 7 95 132 30-14-120 9 73 5-32 14,188 1343 15,531 13-87 6.96 12 77 50.18 913-7 6 38 ,60 6 98 133 40-4-120 4 02 8.03 5,875 363 6,238 5-74 1.88 5 12 32-75 366.9 9 64 .60 10 24 134 40-8-120 7 16 6.89 10,414 892 11,306 10.18 4.62 9 30 45-38 665.1 8 25 ■70 8 95 135 40-12-120 10. 13 5-4' 14,766 1402 16,168 14-43 7.26 13 30 50.30 951 -I 6 48 .62 7- 10 136 50-8-120 7. 84 7.00 11,421 978 12,399 II . 16 5-07 10 20 45-42 729-4 8 38 .72 9 10 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 113 Table 12. — Boiler performance. Boiler performance. Designation of tests. B. t. n. taken up by — a u ■^t! cSfe a> V S.S 0, B lU B — SS„. i°hv s p. B a as asjj a- B nd sup per 1 n combi lonsume 0.S No. Laboratory •O'S CJ3 u •a S a" 3B B * 3 H S) a ^1 B O.rt ^ 0,3 B symbol. 0.6 a u "0 3 «S8 ■3.= -a oiler a: heater comb fired. a Sj 3 ■S.a« oiler a heater B.t.u.i tible c W M M n m P3 n n pa CQ n 1 8 54 55 56 51 58 59 eo 61 6a 63 64 lOI 30-2-240 I165.8 93-17 1259.0 170,992 13.665 184,657 9.413 10,189 66.4 72.9 332.5 102 30-4-240 I168.OI 101.31 1269.3 207,477 17,996 225,473 8,485 9.252 60 I 69 4 406.0 103 30-5-240 1155.0 100. 12550 .... 1030 30-5-240 1 166.0 100 . 59 1266.6 246,697 21,283 267,980 8,271 9,040 58 7 68 3 482.5 104 40-2-240 I167.5 85.95 1253-4 179.332 13.202 192,534 8,924 346.7 105 40-4-240 1167.92 103.0 1270.9 235.336 20,752 256,088 8,373 9.136 59 3 68 4 461.2 106 50-2-240 I167.9 96.17 1264. I 198,114 16,314 214,428 9.204 386.2 107 30-2-200 1 169. 4 85.20 1254.6 130,610 9.516 140,126 9,387 10,431 65 7 74 I 252.3 108 30-4-200 1 166. 9 97.30 1264.2 165,796 13.823 179,619 8,576 3234 109 30-6-200 1 168. I 106.5 1274.6 205,963 18.775 224,738 8.731 9.552 62 3 69 7 404.7 110 40-2-200 1 167. 2 88.37 1255.6 140,401 10,630 151.031 g,6oo 69 7 271.9 III 40-4-200 II55.2 97.0 1252. I ma 40-4-200 1165.25 96.75 1262.0 196,787 16,339 213,126 8,258 9.330 61 4 70 5 383.7 112 40-6-200 II7O.8 no. 6 I281.5 235.772 22,273 258.045 9,021 9,832 63 2 71 7 464.7 "3 50-4-200 1165,5 loi .6 1267 . I 195.152 17,012 212,164 7.553 8,489 53 JL 68 2 381.7 114 20-2-160 1 160. 8 75-4 1236.2 90,678 5.890 96,568 8,805 173.8 "5 20-4-160 1 160. 1 80.96 1 241 . I 108,157 7.548 115.705 9.745 208.4 116 20-6-160 1165.0 92.79 1257.8 137.509 10,952 148,461 8.943 267.3 "7 20-8-160 1165.5 87.40 1252.9 165,482 12,409 177,891 8,267 320.3 118 30-2-160 1 164. 1 76.82 1240.9 102,012 6,734 108,746 10,069 183.4 119 30-4-160 1159.8 83.72 1243.6 128,243 9,257 137,500 9.716 10,576 69 73 8 247-6 120 30-6-160 1166.12 97.38 1263.5 169,729 14,174 183,903 8,682 72 4 331-1 121 30-8-160 1166.5 100.23 1266.7 203,141 17.455 220,596 9.407 10,209 397-2 122 40-2-160 1 164. 1 76.51 1240.6 108,175 7.110 115,289 10,280 207.7 123 40-4-160 1165.6 92.65 1258.3 146.832 7,002 153,834 8.547 277.0 124 40-6-160 "65.3 96. 61 1261.9 182,032 15.091 197,123 9.223 10,170 66 2 72 6 3550 125 40-8-160 1158.4 107.46 1265.9 238,128 22,090 260,218 9,386 468.6 126 50-2-160 1 165. 7 71.40 1237. I 107,046 6,557 113,603 9,836 204.6 127 50-4-160 1165.9 92.39 1258.3 152.697 12,100 164,797 8.673 296.8 128 50-6-160 1166.2 126.29 1292.5 242,239126,233 268,472 8,808 481.6 129 30-4-120 1 160. 7 69.61 1230.3 89.793 5,384 95,177 10,604 171-4 130 30-8-120 1152.4 91 . 10 1243-5 149,617 11,829 161,446 9.813 10,701 69 7 74 7 290.7 131 30-10-120 1160.3 102.27 1262.6 178,055 15,694 193,749 7,678 8,480 53 6 68 9 348.9 132 30-14-120 1158.1 109.61 1267.7 228,381 21,615 249,996 6.741 7,460 47 4 63 5 450.1 133 40-4-120 1159.8 71 .60 I23I.4 94.572 5.842 100,414 9,890 10,817 68 I 75 3 180.8 134 40-8-120 1155-9 99.03 1254-9 167,637 14,363 182,000 8,644 9,446 60 70 9 327.7 135 40-12-120 1157.4 109.90 1267.3 237,691 22,564 260,255 6.857 7,408 46 7 62 7 468.6 136 50-8-120 1156.5 99.10 1255.6 183,851 15,751 199,602 8,789 359-3 114 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN IvOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 13. — Chemical analysis of smoke-box gases. Designation of tests. Laboratory symbol. Gas analysis. 65 66 67 Weight of — Dry gas per pound of carbon. Dry gas per pound of com- bustible. 70 Air per pound of carbon. 71 Air per pound of com- bustible. 78 Ratio of air supplied to theoretical require- ment. lOI 102 103 103a 104 los 106 30-2-240 30-4-240 30-5-240 40-4-240 P. ct. O. 12 •77 .06 •99 Lbs. I7^63 Lbs. 13-41 12.32 II. 31 11.96 Lbs. 17.17 16.45 5^7i 6.48 Lbs. 13.06 89 II 10 1.23 '•25 .16 .22 107 108 109 no III ma 112 113 30-2-200 30-6-200 40-4-200 40-6-200 50-4-200 .01 .27 ■39 .40 . 10 80 16.95 13-52 11.36 13.09 16.64 20.94 7-73 15-32 17-54 17.96 1-53 1.28 1. 16 1 .22 I -32 114 "5 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 30-4-160 30-8-160 40-6-160 29 ■31 -35 19 15-32 14- 14- 9.27 7.82 8.59 40 37 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 30-8-120 30-10-120 30-14-120 40-4-120 40-8-120 40-12-120 -19 -15 .16 . II .04 -27 20 21 21 22 20 20 15-67 14-33 13.66 17.88 15-45 13-08 19.92 20.97 20.58 22.26 20.27 20.00 15 14 13 17 14 12 1 .40 1.50 1 .46 1. 71 1-54 1.42 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN I352 15,398 15,388 15,416 Per pound of front- end cinders. 9.245 11,673 11,239 11,113 Per pound of stack cinders. 90 7,812 8,881 9,211 9,275 Per pound of refuse from ash-pan. 91 6698 7583 7849 7160 107 108 log no III ma 112 113 30-2-200 30-6-200 40-4-200 40-6-200 50-4-200 74 73 73 76 So 74 60 70 65 80 39 45 44 48 41 14,283 14,018 13,457 14,262 14,009 15,875 15,332 15,214 15,566 15,744 10,615 10,442 10,571 10,699 11,534 10,832 8,599 9,949 9,265 11,261 5820 6677 6444 7132 6103 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 30-4-160 30-8-160 40-6-160 14,062 14,216 13,914 15,300 15,425 15,351 9,090 9,293 9,959 7,272 8,305 7,960 5730 6853 6890 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 30-8-120 30-10-120 30-14-120 40-4-120 40-8-120 40-12-120 68 80 86 74 83 87 59 75 83 70 75 82 35 54 41 37 51 41 14,070 14,305 14,215 14,507 14,421 14,690 15,348 15,799 15,714 15,872 15,752 15,857 8,640 11,534 12,337 10,546 11,875 12,627 7,349 10,875 12,000 10,115 10,903 11,980 5228 7984 6114 5490 7565 6092 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN WCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 117 Table 16. — Heat-balances. Designation of tests. lOI 102 103 1030 104 105 106 Laboratory symbol. 30-2-240 30-4-240 30-5-240 40-4-240 HO 13 S . > O 4J « 'S 15,352 I5>398 15.388 15.416 0i5 10,189 9.252 9,040 9.136 B. t. ti, loss per pound of combustible fired. 94 41 25 24 24 39 82 70 33 Oa Mb 688 633 632 625 2087 2049 1975 2057 I o B 72 451 576 565 433 886 1235 1224 100 205 137 141 147 634 933 639 537 965 950 1056 1068 107 108 109 no III ma 112 "3 30-2-200 30-6-200 40-4-200 40-6-200 50-4-200 15.875 15.332 15.214 15,566 15,744 10,430 9,552 9,330 9,832 56 23 58 47 541 637 29 28 34 75 62 55 671 649 544 2392 2297 1801 2325 2133 8 167 746 243 66 670 625 750 918 1882 243 124 206 173 284 738 785 895 588 823 739 1075 711 748 1434 114 "5 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 30-4-160 30-8-160 40-6-160 15,300 15,425 15,351 10,575 10,209 10,170 581 653 646 2160 2342 2272 194 195 229 178 561 463 152 112 205 573 570 604 802 ■716 686 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 30-8-120 30-10-120 30-14 120 40-4-120 40-8-120 40-12-120 15,348 15,799 15,714 15,872 15,752 15,857 10,701 8,480 7,456 10,817 9,446 7,408 34 43 54 55 42 45 59 43 44 46 44 55 597 547 568 486 538 556 2239 2178 2272 2145 2294 2217 130 116 122 89 30 199 270 1910 2373 400 1233 2654 132 326 817 174 320 596 439 948 446 807 665 445 747 1208 1562 853 1140 1680 ii8 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 17. — Heat-balances — Continued. Designation of tests. lOI 102 103 103a 104 105 106 Laboratory symbol. 30-2-240 30-4-240 30-5-240 40-4-240 Per cent of heat— O M 103 0.27 16 0.25 ■S3 46 q.H $>. 107 eg ■5 s a. a 1-34 89 .92 •95 ■13 06 15 iia 6.30 6.17 6.86 6.93 107 108 109 no III Ilia. 112 113 30-2-200 30-6-200 40-4-200 40-6-200 50-4-200 07 ■53 .81 ■35 II .80 65 12 6S 96 63 81 37 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 30-4-160 30-8-160 40-6-160 79 ■99 ■73 ■33 ■74 .70 ■93 .26 ■65 ■49 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 30-8-1 20 30-10-120 30-14-120 40-4-120 40-8-120 40-12-120 86 06 20 10 03 76 86 00 84 09 22 81 87 67 94 31 26 59 SUPERHEATBD STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 119 Table 18. — Events of the stroke from indicator-cards. Designation Indicator results — Events of stroke — Per cent. of tests. Admission. Cut-off. Laboratory Right side. Left side. Right side. Left side. No. symbol. Average. Average. H. E. C. E. H. E. C. E. H. E. C. E. H. E. C. E. 1 8 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 131 188 lOI 30-2-240 4.00 3.12 2-37 2.49 2.99 15.70 13-41 16.79 16.20 15-52 102 30-4-240 2 54 2 25 I 20 I 91 1 97 20.87 20.08 22.45 22.20 21 .40 103 30-5-240 I 97 I 42 I 21 I 55 I 54 25-30 23-17 25-63 27.55 25-41 103a 30-5-240 104 40-2-240 15.61 15-55 17.00 17.22 16.34 105 40-4-240 3 21 2 94 2 09 2 71 2 74 22.36 20.81 24.09 26.35 23 40 106 50-2-240 18.08 16.83 17.41 17 .00 17-32 107 30-2-200 5 33 4 37 2 96 3 13 3 95 15-53 12.93 15-46 14.80 14.68 108 30-4-200 3 50 2 60 I 87 2 43 2 60 21 .00 18.60 20.46 23.40 20.86 109 30-6-200 2 39 I 27 I 10 1 50 1 57 26.21 25 23 26.87 30.20 27.13 no 40-2-200 5 04 3 55 3 65 3 08 3 83 16.77 15.08 17-15 16.31 16-33 III 40-4-200 2 67 2 47 2 20 2 77 2 53 21 . 12 21.30 21.87 25-37 22.41 ma 40-4-200 112 .40-6-200 4 00 2 97 3 14 3 32 3 36 28.60 27-73 30.07 31-64 29-51 "3 50-4-200 3 40 2 10 2 10 2 10 2 43 22.20 22.40 22.40 24.00 22.75 114 20-2-160 4 47 5 72 3 69 3 II 4 24 16.27 12.99 14.96 13.72 14.48 "5 20-4-160 2 10 3 26 I 86 I 60 2 20 22 .07 19-56 22.96 21 .26 21 .46 116 20-6-160 60 2 60 30 I 30 I 20 28.06 24.20 25.80 30.33 27.09 "7 20-8-160 I 06 2 03 83 ± 16 I 27 36.86 30.87 34.60 39-93 35.56 n8 30-2-160 5 00 4 32 3 93 3 46 4 18 15-16 12.80 14-77 14.46 14.29 119 30-4-160 20.06 18.63 21 .61 21.57 20.47 120 30-6-160 I 93 2 23 93 I 53 I 65 26.67 24.60 26.00 31-23 27. 12 121 30-8-160 2 06 I 96 I 32 86 I 55 35-13 31-93 33-78 36.06 34-22 122 40-2-160 5 40 4 06 4 06 3 00 4 13 15.26 13-33 16.26 14-93 14.94 123 40-4-160 3 30 3 93 3 57 2 93 3 43 20.80 21 .00 20.80 22-57 21.29 124 40-6-160 27 . 20 25-71 27.80 30.66 27.83 125 40-8-160 I 33 3 00 98 I 33 I 66 36-13 34-14 35.87 41-47 36.90 126 50-2-160 5 41 4 58 5 83 4 50 5 08 16-33 14. 16 17.50 14.66 15-66 127 50-4-160 4 91 4 33 6 08 5 25 5 14 22.83 20.50 23.66 22.33 22.33 128 50-6-160 I 77 I 75 I 37 I 25 I 53 26.50 26.50 28.25 30.75 28.00 129 30-4-120 20.40 17.70 20.40 19.00 19-38 130 30-8-120 35 63 32.25 35.00 38-36 35-31 131 30-10-120 I 63 1 92 I 29 I 54 1 60 43-83 39 50 41-25 46-33 42-73 132 30-14-120 33 63 21 25 35 58.42 52-42 55-42 61.92 57-04 133 40-4-120 21 .40 18.40 21,93 20.13 20.47 134 40-8-120 3 40 3 43 3 43 4 00 3 56 36.13 31.67 35.33 38-28 35-60 135 40-12-120 2 22 2 56 I 72 I 89 2 10 52.55 47-67 49.22 55-33 51-19 136 50-8-120 36.50 32-33 35-50 37-83 35-54 SUPBRHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 19. — Events of the stroke — Continued. Designation of tests. Indicator results — Events of stroke — Per cent. No. lOI 102 103 103a 104 105 106 Laboratory symbol. Right side. H.E. % 123 30-2-240 30-4-240 30-5-240 30-5-240 40—2—240 40-4-240 50-2-240 62 .99 68.03 71.30 64.66 65-57 64- 75 62.03 66.07 70.97 C. E. 134 Left side. H.E. 125 64-15 70.08 72.80 63.96 70.00 65-41 64.94 71.66 75-57 64-J7 69-45 60.83 C. E. 126 Average. 127 63-53 68.96 72.66 63-44 67.86 62.81 Compression. Right side. H. E. 128 37.28 31-58 29.90 36-77 31-55 29.08 C.E. 129 33-24 31-33 29.27 35-27 32 .00 36.00 Left side. H. E. 130 36.12 31-75 27-45 37.22 31.09 39-08 C.E. Average. 131 34-37 29-37 28.50 36-61 33 40 35-00 132 35-25 31.01 28.78 36.46 32.01 34-79 107 108 109 no III ma 112 "3 30-2-200 30-4-200 30-6-200 40—2—200 40-4-200 40-4-200 40-6-200 50-4-200 65-13 69.00 69.21 65-23 70. 12 65.40 68.46 68.87 63.07 70.87 71.47 70.13 72.21 62.80 64.40 64.00 66.13 70.86 71.80 63.76 71.87 73 36 67.40 64 73 68 71 69 30 63 94 70 65 71 79 64.65 59 60 69 22 71 21 75 43 62 77 68 12 66 88 75 23 64.36 66 22 71 35 76 03 62 37 68 92 68 06 40.00 35-93 30.29 40-31 33 30 32-13 35-40 36 40 31 46 27 77 34 85 34 42 29 27 33 40 37-93 30.93 26.57 40.85 26.60 28.00 31.80 31.80 33-00 30.17 36.92 30.47 29.36 34.80 36.53 32-83 28.70 38-23 31.20 29.69 34-10 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 20-2-160 20-4-160 20-6-160 20-8-160 30-2-160 30-4-160 30-6-160 30-8-160 40-2-160 40-4-160 40-6-160 40-8-160 50-2-160 50-4-160 50-6-160 59 38 69 40 71 46 75 14 63 20 68 56 66 46 76 27 64 93 66 53 72 33 75 74 64 66 68 58 65 50 67 10 76 35 82 08 86 58 68 47 79 86 84 33 70 33 58.82 67-70 68.60 73-66 62 . 22 66.03 66.90 73.47 66.13 65.34 69.64 74-79 60. 16 66.80 69.00 59.22 70.00 72.40 75.47 62.83 69. 10 66.07 75-64 63.26 64.74 71 .60 75-74 63-33 70. 16 68.00 61 .00 69.80 72-40 77.47 62.83 68.79 68.10 75.54 63.13 68.28 71-93 77-87 62.33 70. 16 69-75 36-83 33-21 26.80 25.20 42. 10 37-56 30.60 26.20 46. 20 35 -80 31.80 26.67 44.16 37-16 32-75 37-55 32-13 29-40 26.20 36-64 35.80 32-17 23-66 39-93 36.00 31-50 29.22 40. 16 34-66 33-50 35-83 31-53 24-93 21.80 43.26 36-18 29.00 25.00 43.40 37-47 31-93 25-53 47.66 39-50 29-75 35-50 30.06 23.06 23.66 37-56 35.18 29.86 25.13 41 .06 35.07 31.00 23.40 42.00 36.66 31-50 36.43 31-73 26.05 24.21 39-89 36-18 30-41 24-99 42-65 36.08 31-51 26.20 43-49 36.99 33-45 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 30-4-120 30-8-120 30-10-120 30-14-120 40-4-120 40-8-120 40-12-120 50-8-120 69.70 66.80 68.40 68.00 40.00 74-07 75-58 75-94 75.48 29.23 77-25 79.92 81.33 80.14 26.33 84.08 86.33 87-67 86.17 17-75 67-53 68.66 67.20 67-97 42.07 76.26 78.20 79-67 78.50 29.80 80.67 83-33 84-78 83-28 20.89 66.50 67-33 68.50 68.16 30.33 36.90 25-90 24.00 15-50 37-73 28.27 20.44 29 -33 37.80 25-79 22.67 16.00 41.07 28.07 20.22 27.33 35-10 25-54 22.92 15.67 36.93 28.40 21 . II 27.67 37-45 26.61 23-75 16.23 39-45 28.64 20.67 28.66 SUPBRHEATBD STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 20. — Pressures from indicator-cards. Designation of tests. Indicator results — Pressure above atmosphere. No. Laboratory symbol. Initial. At cut-off. Right side. Left side. Average Right side. Left side. Average. H. E. C. E. H. E. C. E. H. E. C, E, H. E. C. E. 1 a 133 ]3 3 ^ t; u oii ■ 3 cd M S «i (J dJ "-" n S .2-2 B IP O H 3 + °&§ d S ^ aid • Pi 187 188 190 191 192 193 19S lOI 102 103 103a 104 105 106 30-2-240 30-4-240 30.5-240 30-5-240 40—2—240 40-4-240 50-2-240 ■ 0953 .0736 .0741 .0863 •0925 ■ 0731 0.0812 .0772 .0717 .0849 .0948 .0868 o . 0906 .0717 .0670 ,0858 .0783 ■0934 0.0836 .0758 .0728 .0821 .0880 .071 ■ 3507 .2983 .2856 • 3391 • 3556 ■ 3247 Lbs. 0.9814 I . 2400 1-3468 '.7817 I. 0150 ■6789 Lbs. I. 3321 1-5383 1.6324 .1208 .3686 -0036 82.76 82.15 83-13 85-69 85-83 89.20 + + + 1383 0928 0652 0851 0457 0585 + 3-30" + 1-6545 + 1-0490 + 2 + + 1 3800 9590 8645 107 108 109 no III ma 112 113 30-2-200 30-4-200 30-6-200 40-2-200 40-4-200 40-4-200 40-6-200 50-4-200 .0808 -0753 .0712 . lOIO .0746 ■ 0655 .0634 .0811 -0749 .0738 .0825 . IIOI .0799 -0847 .0719 .0663 -0615 .0867 -0635 .0731 -0941 .0586 -0655 .0683 .0808 .0614 .0788 .0818 -2859 .2726 .2644 -3496 -2736 -3143 -3707 .7296 -9439 .1605 -5945 -8333 ■0155 .2165 -4249 .9442 . 1069 . 9906 1 . 3049 90 .69291.0636 87 85.20 86.24 89.70 90.00 88.35 92 91.40 14 91.74 0922 0595 0066 0627 0461 0071 + 0490 + 1 + 2, + 1. + . + 2 + 1 8976 3611 1133 3635 1673 1439 4160 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 20-2-160 20-4-160 20-6-160 20-8-160 30-2-160 30-4-160 30-6-160 30-8-160 40-2-160 40—4—160 40-6-160 40-8-160 50-2-160 50-4-160 50-6-160 .0660 -0545 -0503 .0449 -0731 .0624 .0568 .0584 .0815 .0799 .0716 -0565 .0811 .0760 .0686 -0643 •0584 -0538 -0475 .0720 .0642 .0614 .0568 .0766 .0712 .0660 .0636 .0786 -0735 .0699 .0660 -0545 -0459 -0397 .0748 .0640 -0536 .0570 -0739 -0728 .0667 .0511 .0891 .0765 -0643 .0656 .0516 .0440 -0439 .0709 .0650 -058^ -0553 .0782 .0689 .0690 .0509 -0770 .0764 .0684 .2619 .2190 .1940 . 1760 .2908 -2556 -2304 .2275 .3102 .2928 -2733 .2221 -3258 .3024 .2712 -7755 ■9451 ,1823 ■4285 -5707 ■7497 ,9769 ■1635 .4498 .6282 .7864 .0364 -3589 .5228 -8393 -0374 .1641 -3763 .6045 -8615 .0050 .2073 .3910 .7600 .9210 -0597 -2585 .6847 -8252 .1105 22 69 32 26 62 56 91 15 46 43 39 35 10 88 91 48 79 1218 0919 0998 0063 1041 0790 0249 0042 0740 0630 0179 0359 0596 0374 0170 + 4 + 2 + 1 + + 4 + 2 + + 4 + 2 + + 4 + 256 3054 9440 1006 7760 4160 5636 7650 1840 1584 4880 7027 822 1589 4752 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 30- -4- 120 30- -8- 120 30- -I0-I20J 30-14 -120 40- -4- 120 40- -8- 120 40- -12 -120 50- -8- 120 .0671 -0522 -0507 -0407 ■ 073 .0604 .0526 .0689 -0593 -0550 .0478 .0440 .0688 .0584 -0552 .0636 .0661 -0585 .2510 .0467 .0440 .1980 .0449 .0442 .1876 -0394 ■0379 .1620 .0764 .0642 .2826 .0548 -0575 .2311 .0489 -0527 .2094 ■ 0655 -0655 -2635 -5075 -8737 -0384 -3322 -4039 -7305 .0219 .6406 -7585 .0717 .2260 .4941 .6865 .9616 -2313 .9041 76 89 95 109 82 94 107 95 93 105 90 93 104 93 0989 0026 0296 0540 0562 0086 0435 0135 + 5 + + 3 .2610 ,0686 .6291 .9151 .6740 .2622 .9276 -4797 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 127 Table 26. — Performance of the locomotive as a whole. Designation of tests. Locomotive performance. Machine friction. No. Laboratory Draw-bar Dynamom- eter horse- Steam per D. H. P. Coal per D. H. P. Coal per I. H. P. symbol. pull. power. M. E. P. Per cent I. H. P. Horse- power. per hour. per hour. per hour. 1 8 196 J 97 198 199 »00 «01 20a 203 Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. 10 1 30-2-240 3905 314.20 7.80 15.06 55-56 27-56 3-75 3-195 102 30-4-240 5258 407 . 30 10.09 14-56 69.40 25-88 3-92 3-346 103 30-5-240 5910 463 15 10. 19 13.28 70.92 26.13 1030 30-5-240 4-04 3-556 104 40-2-240 3295 348.80 705 15-97 66.30 26.03 3-71 3-130 105 40-4-240 4596 485 ■ 29 7.04 11.98 66.05 24-23 3-78 3-327 106 50-2-240 2723 367 04 8.09 20.87 96.83 27-35 3-81 3.018 107 30-2-200 2816 226.28 7-59 19-31 54-16 28.42 3-96 3-195 108 30-4-200 4154 332 . 20 7.22 13-37 51-24 24.92 3-78 3-276 109 30-6-200 5471 442.91 10.30 14-32 74-06 23-27 3-49 2.987 110 40-2-200 2396 255-38 5-74 17-52 54-20 27.16 3-70 3-052 III 40-4-200 3549 382.18 8.82 18.07 84-33 25-77 ma 40-4-200 4.04 3-482 112 40-6-200 4714 512.62 7-87 12.91 76.01 23.06 3-35 2.919 "3 50-4-200 3219 413.68 6.47 15-13 73-78 23.61 4-07 3-457 114 20-2-160 2367 12577 8.69 24-58 41 .00 35-90 5-23 3-945 "5 20-4-160 3457 18353 10.30 20.94 48.62 29.99 4. 10 3-239 116 20-6-160 4466 238.00 13-13 20.70 62.16 29.04 4.18 3-318 117 20-8-160 5836 311-57 11.63 15-04 55-14 26.85 4-15 3-523 118 30-2-160 2028 162.45 4.08 15.18 29.08 30-85 3-99 3-382 119 30-4-160 3043 242.13 6.12 15.16 43-26 27 .02 3-51 2.975 120 30-6-160 4065 324.90 8.81 16.13 62.46 26.36 3-91 3-280 121 30-8-160 5342 427-50 8.64 11.27 54-32 23.90 3-29 2.918 122 40-2-160 1291 140.71 7-31 33-46 70.75 38-18 4.78 3-183 123 40-4-160 2279 244. 16 10.41 28.87 99.12 30.26 4-43 3-150 124 40-6-160 3688 393 - 80 3-80 8.37 36.00 23-39 3-26 2.983 125 40-8-160 4577 488.85 11.58 18.35 109.85 24-85 3-40 2.780 126 50-2-160 1115 148.31 2.70 17.71 31-93 35-30 4-67 3 845 127 50-4-160 2107 279-98 5-35 18.38 63-07 27.22 4-07 3.321 128 50-6-160 3140 418.33 8.60 19-56 101.70 29-33 4.38 3.520 129 30-4-120 1715 137-15 3-68 16.01 26.15 32.48 3-93 3-297 130 30-8-120 3654 294-55 5-69 12.15 40.72 26.23 3-35 2.947 131 30-10-120 4638 368 . 20 5-86 10.08 41-32 24-56 4-12 3.698 132 30-14-120 5758 459 - 90 8.12 II. 13 57-59 25-38 4.84 4-298 133 40-4-1 20 1325 140.98 3-98 21 .07 37.60 33-44 4-32 3-412 134 40-8-120 3195 339-95 4-54 II .21 42-94 25.09 3-71 3.296 135 40-12-120 4697 500.00 5-03 8.69 47-57 24-31 4-55 4-157 136 50-8-120 ^731 364-30 4.01 11-53 47-50 25-71 3-74 3-316 128 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 27. — Comparative performance of the locomotive, assuming irregularities in the results of individual tests to have been eliminated. Designation of tests. Corrected locomotive performance. v^'fe t;-3 * s^ Ph Ih OJ ■ Machine friction. i Ai S • hOS & Tj. P,-° OS jJJ "b No. Laboratory symbol. S t! :as Hi evap. .d of dry c quation 706-0.21 •3 8.2 P,J3 ■3S a; ll a 1 Ih 01 4 So* sa.&ii "^ a a OP, ■3K p; u B 2 no •3 w '^ w" g «■ (S p Q 1 2 »04 SOS 306 307 308 309 810 ail 818 813 814 815 Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. lOI 30-2-240 11,308 9.716 1164 3.14 30-59 6.5 46.45 12.58 323-31 4020 3-60 34.97 102 30-4-240 13.853 9.268 1495 3.13 29.07 8 .5 58.49 12.27 418. 19 5396 3 58 33 13 103 30-5-240 15.187 9 034 1681 3-07 27.79 8 .9 61.95 11.33 472.12 6022 3 56 32 17 103a 30-5-240 104 40-2-240 11,786 9.632 1224 2-95 28.40 6 5 61 . 12 14.72 353-97 3343 3 46 33 30 105 40-4-240 15.467 8.984 1722 3-12 28.06 8 5 79.69 14.45 471.67 4465 3 87 34 77 106 50-2-240 13.129 9 396 1397 3.01 28.31 6 J_ 77.24 16.65 386.63 2865 _3. 61 33 96 107 30-2-200 8.312 10.242 812 2.90 29.64 6 5 46-38 16.54 234.06 2910 3 47 35 51 108 30-4-200 10,815 9.802 1103 2.88 28.21 8 5 60.37 15.74 323.07 4037 3 41 33 48 109 30-6-200 13.571 9-318 1457 2.82 26.26 9 3 66.86 12.94 450.11 5559 3 24 30 15 no 40-2-200 9,007 10. 121 890 2.87 29. 10 6 5 61.42 19.84 248.16 2331 3 59 36 30 III 40-4-260 12,865 9.442 1363 ^.92 27.58 8 5 81.29 17.43 385.22 3579 3 54 33 40 Ilia 40-4-200 112 40-6-200 15,622 8.957 1744 2.96 26.54 9 3 89.82 15.26 498.81 4584 3 50 31 33 113 50-4-200 12,803 9-453 1355 2.78 26.27 8 J_ 96.99 19.90 390.47 3039 _J_ M 32 80 114 20-2-160 5.929 10. 911 414 2.48 35.55 6 5 30.67 18-39 136.10 2559 3 04 43 56 115 20-4-160 7,070 10.462 676 2.91 30-45 8 5 40.08 17.26 192.07 3611 3 52 36 81 116 20-6-160 8,969 10. 128 885 2-95 29.88 9 3 44.02 14.66 256.14 4802 3 45 35 01 117 26-8-160 10,811 9.803 1103 3.01 29.49 8 4 39-83 10.86 326.88 6115 3 37 33 08 118 30-2-160 6,421 10.824 463 2.42 33-53 6 5 46.24 24.14 145-29 1811 3 19 44 91 119 30-4-160 8.443 10.220 826 2.89 29-58 8 5 60.06 21 .04 225-33 2830 3 67 37 47 120 30-6-160 11,156 9-743 "45 2.96 28.81 9 3 66.01 17.04 321-35 4019 3 56 34 72 121 30-8-160 13.363 9.354 1429 2-97 27-74 8 4 59-69 12.39 422.13 5272 3 39 31 66 122 40-2-160 6,886 10 . 760 500 2.36 32-56 6 5 62.72 29.66 148.74 1362 3 36 46 30 123 40-4-160 9.587 10.019 957 2.79 27-93 8 5 80.94 23.58 262.34 2447 3 65 36 54 124 40-6-160 12,011 9.592 1252 2.91 27-95 9 3 88.21 20.52 341-59 3199 3 67 35 17 125 40-8-160 15,944 8.900 1792 2-99 26.63 8 4 79-68 13-31 519-02 4857 3 45 30 72 126 50-2-160 6,688 10.784 486 2.70 37-10 6 5 76.78 42.60 103.46 778 4 70 64 62 127 50-4-160 9,882 9.967 992 2.89 28.81 8 5 100 . 30 29.24 242.75 1827 4 09 40 71 128 50-6-160 16,344 8.830 1851 3-56 31-43 9 3_ 110.04 21 . 16 409.99 3076 _1 31 39 87 129 30-4-120 5.649 10.712 527 3-23 34-60 8 5 60.37 36.97 102.93 1287 5 12 54 89 130 30-8-120 9.924 9.960 996 2.97 29.60 8 4 60.13 17-93 275.14 3412 3 62 36 07 131 30-10-120 11,766 9.637 1221 2.98 28.72 6 9 48-65 11.87 361.07 4546 3 38 32 59 132 30-14-120 15.296 g.014 1697 3-28 29.56 3 21.28 4. II 496.21 6208 3 42 30 83 133 40-4-120 5,989 10.652 562 3-15 33-54 8 5 80.32 44.97 98.26 922 5 72 60 96 134 40-8-120 11,074 9.757 "35 2.96 28.93 8 4 79-39 20.74 303-50 2851 3 74 36 49 135 J.0-I2-I20 15,925 8.904 1789 3-27 29.09 5 47-27 8.63 500.30 4698 3 58 31 83 136 50-8-120 12,159 9-566 1271 3-09 29-53 8 4 99-51 24.17 312.29 2339 4 07 38 94 APPENDIX III. TESTS UNDER INTERMITTENT CONDITIONS OF RUNNING, METHODS, AND DATA. 50. The Conditions under which Tests Were Run. — Nine intermittent tests were made, two each under a boiler-pressure of 240, 200, 160, and 120 pounds, respectively, and one duplicate. The plan of the tests involved the operation of the locomotive under each pressure, according to two definite schedules governing periods of running and periods of standing. Grouped by schedules, therefore, the tests may be arranged in two series. The schedule of the first of these series provides six periods of running and five periods of standing, the duration of the running time being one-half the duration of the test. Tests of this series will, therefore, be hereafter referred to as half-time tests. The schedule of the second series provides four periods of running and three of standing, the total duration of the running time being equal to one-fourth the total duration of the test. Tests of this series will hereafter be referred to as one-quarter time tests. A period of 120 minutes at the beginning of the test was used to start the fire and to bring the pressure of the boiler to the required standard. Graphical schedules showing the exact program of run- ning are presented as figs. 61 and 62. These give the time of occurrence and the duration of the running and standing periods. They also show the speed, the position of the reverse-lever, and the dry-pipe pressure. 51. A Summary of the Observed and Calculated Data is presented by tables 28 to 36. An explanation of the several items comprising these tables is as follows : Table 28. — Generai, Conditions. Column I . Test number. Column 2. Laboratory symbol. — The first term of this symbol defines the proportion of the running time to the total time of the test, and the last three represent the speed, the position of cut-ofF, and the boiler-pressure, respec- tively. Thus, ^(30-3-240) designates a half-time test at a boiler-pressure of 240 pounds, speed 30 miles per hour, and cut-off third notch from center forward. Column 3. Date of test. Column 4. Duration of period when engine is starting and stopping. — ^This item includes the time during which the locomotive is in the process of starting and stopping and the preliminary running at slow speed at the beginning of the test. Column 5. Duration of periods when engine is running at speed. Column 6. Duration of periods when engine is standing. Column 7. Duration of period before starting, during which fire was burning and steam-pressure was being raised. 129 I30 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Column 8. Total duration of period after starting engine.— This item includes the total time from the starting of the engine to the conclusion of the test. Column 8a. Total duration of test. — ^This item includes the total time from the time the fire was started to the conclusion of the test. Column g. Temperature of the laboratory, °F.— The values given are the average of observations taken at 20-minute intervals. Column 10. Barometer-pressure, pounds per square inch. Column II. Boiler-pressure when the engine is starting and stopping. — ^The values given are the average of observations taken at 2 -minute intervals. Column 1 2 . Boiler-pressure when the engine is running at speed. — ^The values given are the average of observations taken at 5-minute intervals. Column 13. Dry-pipe pressure when engine is starting and stopping. — ^The values given are the average of observations taken at 2 -minute intervals. Table 29. — Speed and Water. Cohunn 14. Temperature of steam, when engine is starting and stopping. — The values of this column represent the average of observations taken at 2-minute intervals. The thermometer used was placed in the left branch- pipe at a point immediately adjoining the connection to steam-header. Column 15. Temperature of steam when engine is running at speed. — ^The values in this column are averages of observations at 5-minute intervals. Column 16. Degrees superheat when engine is running at speed. — ^The values in this column are obtained by subtracting the temperature corresponding to the pressure shown in column 12, from the average observed temperature when the engine is running at speed (column 15). Column 17. Speed, revolutions per minute when engine is starting and stop- ping. — The values in this column are averages of the engine register made at 2-minute intervals. Colum,n 18. Speed, miles per hour, when engine is starting and stopping, , column 17 X 60 equals . 292.31 Colum,n 19. Revolutions per minute when engine is running under constant conditions. — The values in this column are averages of readings at 5-minute intervals. Column 20. Speed, miles per hour, when engine is running at speed, equals column 19 X 60 292.31 Column 2 1 . Miles equivalent to total revolutions equals column 17 X column 4 -|- column 19 X column 5 292 .3E Column 22. Temperature of feed-water. — ^The values of this column are averages of observations made at lo-minute intervals. Column 23. Water delivered to the boiler when engine is starting and stopping equals the total amount of water weighed to the injectors duriag conditions of starting, stopping, and standing, less the loss due to injector overflow, during this time. Column 24. Water delivered to the boiler when engine is running at speed equals the total amount of water weighed to the injectors during the time the engine is running at speed less the injector overflow during this period. Column 25. Total water delivered to the boiler equals column 23-l-column 24. SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 131 Tabi,e 30. — -Water, Coal, and Draft. Column 26. Water used by the engine when the engine is starting and stopping equals column 23 minus the steam lost by the calorimeter, the aspirator, and at the thermometer-plugs during the total time of starting, stopping, and standing. Column 27. Water used by the engine when engine is running at speed equals column 24 minus the steam lost by the calorimeter, the aspirator, and at the thermometer-plugs during the total time during which the engine is running at speed. Column 28. Total water used by the engine equals column 26 + column 27. Column 29. Dry coal fired when engine is starting and stopping. Column 30. Dry coal fired when engine is running at speed. Column 3 1 . Total dry coal used from, time of starting the engine equals column 29 -|- column 30. Column 32. Dry coal used to raise steam,- pressure. — Both coal and wood were used in "firing up." The values in this column include both coal and wood, the latter being expressed in terms of coal under the assumption that its heating value equals one-fourth that of coal. Column 33. Front-end cinders, pounds. Column 34. Stack cinders, pounds. Column 35. Dry ash, pounds. Column 36. Draft in front-end, inches of water. — ^The values in this column are averages of readings taken at 2 and 5 minute intervals. The average is based on the relative time of the two periods of running, starting, and stopping, and running at speed. Column 37. Temperature of escaping gases. — The values in this column are averages of observations at 5-minute intervals. Table 31. — Boiler and Engine Performance. Column 38. Equivalent evaporation per hour from and at 212° F. Column 39. Equivalent evaporation from, and at 212° F. per square foot of ■water and superheating surface per hour equals column 38 divided by 12 16. Column 40. Equivalent evaporation from and at 212° F. per pound of dry coal equals column 38 X column 8 -^ column 31 X 60. Column /^i. Average indicated horse-power when engine is starting and stopping. Colum,n 42. Average indicated horse-power when engine is running at speed. Column 43. Total average indicated horse-power equals column 41 X column 4 + column 42 X column 5 column 4 -|- column 5 Column 44. Draw-bar pull when engine is starting and stopping. — The values in this column are averages of observations made at 2-minute intervals. Column 45. Draw-bar pull when engine is running at speed. — The values in this column are averages of observations made at 5-minute intervals. Column 46. Draw-bar horse-power when engine is starting and stopping equals 0.000547 X column 17 X column 44. Column 47. Draw-bar horse-power when engine is running at speed equals 0.000547 X column 45 X column 19. Column 48. Average draw-bar horse-power equals column 46 X column 4 -\- column 47 X column 5 column 4 + column 5. 132 SUPBRHEATSD STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. TABI.E 32. — Engine and Locomotive Performance. Column 49. Steam per indicated horse- power per hour when engine is running at speed equals column 27 X 60 divided by column 42 X column 5. Column 50. Steam, per indicated horse-power per hour for total time equals column 28 X 60 divided by (column 4 + column 5) X column 43. Column 51. Equivalent steam from and at 212° F. per draw-bar horse-power per hour when engine is running at speed. Column 52. Equivalent steam from and at 212° F. per draw-bar horse-power per hour for total time. Column 53. Dry coal per draw-bar horse-power per hour when engine is running at speed equals column 30 X 60 divided by column 5 X column 47. Column 54. Dry coal per draw-bar horse-power for total time equals column 31 X 60 divided by column 48 X (column 4 + column 5). Column 55. Dry coal per draw-bar horse-power per hour for total time, including coal used to start fire in boiler, equals (column 31 + column 32) X 60 divided by column 48 X (column 4 + column 5). Table 33. — Chemicai, Analysis of Smoke-box Gases. Columns 56, 57, 58, and 59. Gas analysis was made with the Orsat appara- tus. The method of drawing the sample was the same as described in Appen- dix II . The values given are the average of observations taken during the time when the engine was running only. Column 60. Dry gas per pound of carbon consumed = 11CO2 + 802-F 7(C0 + N) 3(C02 -t- CO) Column 61. Dry gas per pound of combustible fired = column 60 X per cent of carbon in combustible (based on combustible consumed) -r- 100. Column 62. Air per pound of carbon consumed= ;-— ^^-^ ^ ^ ' o.33(C02 + CO) Column 63. Air per pound of combustible fired = column 62 X per cent of carbon in combustible (based on combustible consumed) -e- 100. Column 64. Ratio of air supplied to theoretical requirements = — ^r- ' ^^ ^ N-3.78XO2 Table 34. — Chemical Analysis of Coal. proximate analysis. Column 65. Moisture, per cent. Column 66. Volatile m.atter, per cent. Colum/n 67. Fixed carbon, per cent. Column 68. Ash, per cent. ultimate analysis. Column 69. Carbon, per cent. Column 70. Hydrogen, per cent. Column 7 1 . Nitrogen, per cent. Column 72. Oxygen, per cent. Column 73. Sulphur, per cent. Column 74. Ash, per cent. superheated steam in locomotive service. 133 Table 35. — Calorikc Values. The values of this table are those reported by the Fuel Testing Laboratory of the Technologic Branch of the United States Geological Survey, to which laboratory sealed samples were delivered. Column 75. Per cent of combustible in front-end cinders. Column 76. Per cent of combustible in stack cinders. Column 77. Per cent of combustible in refuse from ash-pan. Column 78. Calonfic value per pound of dry coal, B. t. u. Column 79. Calorific value per pound of combustible, B. t. u. Column 80. Calorific value per pound of front-end cinders, B. t. u. Column 81. Calorific value per pound of stack cinders, B. t. u. Column 82. Calorific value per pound of refuse from, ash-pan, B. t. u. Table 36. — Heat-Balance. Column 83. Calorific value per pound of combustible, B. t. u. Column 84. B. t. u. absorbed by boiler per pound of combustible. Column 85. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to water in coal = — < (212 — t) + r -\- c {T — 212) >■ where t = temperature of laboratory. a = per cent of moisture referred to combustible. r = 965.8. c = specific heat of steam at constant pressure. T = temperature of the smoke-box gases. Column 86. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible by water formed from hydrogen in coal = per cent of hydrogen referred to combustible -=- 100 X 9 [(212 — column 9) -}- 965.8 -f 0.48 X (column 37 — 212)]. Column 87. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to escaping gases = column 61 X 0.24 (column 37 — column 9). Column 88. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to incomplete combustion=^ _ _ per cent of carbon in combustible 10150 ^\J X 100 (CO2 + CO) Colum,n 89. B. t. u. lost per pound of comiustible due to front-end cinders = 100 X column 33 X column 80 ~- column 31 X (100 — column 74). Column 90. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to stack cinders = 100 X column 34 X column 81 -^ column 31 -^ (100 — column 74). Column 91. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible due to refuse in ash = 100 X column 35 X column 82 -r- column 31 X (100 — column 74). Column 92. B. t. u. lost per pound of combustible unaccounted for = column 83 — column 84 — column 85 — column 86 — column 87 — column 88 — col- umn 89 — column 90 — column 91. 134 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 28. — General conditions {intermittent tests). Designation of test. Duration of periods. .a Boiler-pressure by gage. •1 b a s§ bo .a c g lU u to a si No. Laboratory symbol. Date. t. " n .Sn 1 .2-S a ^ 1 ■s V c a 1 "3 1 •0 a 0, .Bg g .a-g k3 h bo a 2 u w g v." □ a r. _ S g n ^ tj •a" d a u ^ tf e c ^ P P « H t- fH pa fi p R 1 8 3 4 5 6 7 8 8a 9 10 11 18 13 Min. Min. Min. M«. Min. Min. op Lbs. 20I i(30-3-240) July 19 100 I. SO I, SO 120 400 S20 86.2 14-39 194.6 232-5 91.6 202 1(30-3-240) July 23 80 80 240 120 400 ,S20 88.1 14.42 195-0 236-7 86 7 203 i(30-5-200) July 18 100 I, SO I. SO 120 400 ,520 8,S.4 14.47 183-5 200.3 8,S 7 204 1(30-5-200) July 16 80 80 240 120 400 .S20 84.0 14.40 158.4 199.7 73 S 205 4(30-7-160) July 9 100 I, SO I, SO 120 400 ,S20 87-7 14-37 171-3 160.6 64 9 205a i(3o-7-i6o) July 10 100 I. SO I. SO 120 400 520 85.6 14-35 161 .4 160. I 70 I 206 i(30-7-i6o) July 13 80 80 240 120 400 ,S20 82.4 14.41 141. 8 159-7 65 4 207 i(30-io-i2o) July II 100 I. SO 150 120 400 520 79.6 14-31 126.5 119. 7 65 6 208 i(3O-I0-I20) July 12 80 80 240 120 400 520 81. 1 14-43 "7-9 121 . 1 64 8 Table 29. — speed and water {intermittent tests). Sff a Speed g •5-9 % 0, n when en- Speed when 3 "Water delivered to Designation of test. at ^^ «1 1) a; starting and running at speed. M ■s 3 boiler and presumably evaporated. 'o-S 3.S IS"" r^2 stopping. ■2-2 s > ° '3 ^. No. Laboratory u "0. 3 s u V p. % .a* gag, symbol. S-9 s.a II "a II V Q, "^.Q 0)-" 2 fi, B 5 ay S & 1 1 ^ s a p 1 1 8 14 16 16 17 18 10 80 81 88 83 84 85 "F. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. 20I ^(30-3-240) 477-3 535-3 135-4 67-5 13-9 146. 1 30.0 98.1 69. I 11,377 24,422 35,799 202 i(30-3-24o) 446.9 537 9 136.5 64 9 13 3 146 6 ,30.1 57-9 69 -5 9,890 13,137 23,027 203 4(30-5-200) 476.4 533 I 145-3 66 4 13 6 145 8 .30.0 97-5 70.0 9,501 24,962 34,463 204 i(30-5-2oo) 462 .0 527 4 139.8 69 5 14 3 153 6 31-6 61. 1 69-9 9,376 13,648 23,024 205 i(3o-7-i6o) 467-9 519 4 148.8 77 8 16 144 6 29.7 lOI .0 70.6 9,302 25,312 34,614 2050 4(30-7-160) 459-6 519 8 149-5 67 2 13 8 148 7 30 . 5 99-3 6g.o 9,174 24,397 33,571 206 i(3o-7-i6o) 466.2 525 5 155-3 68 2 14 147 5 ,30.3 59-1 68.1 9,088 13,548 22,636 207 4(30-10-120) 456.6 509 I 159-7 72 4 H 9 146 6 .30.1 100.3 68.0 10,196 24,146 34,342 208 1(30-10-120) 452-4 506 3 156.0 68. 14 152 9 31-4 60.5 69-9 8,878 13,450 22,328 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 135 Table 30. — Water, coal, and draft {intermittent tests). Designation of test. Water used by engine. Dry coal fired. ^ s u IS .13 bo bo a t bo ■o t c u ^r. m «'!il c a . 1Sg 2. m bi rn.S S 11 t\ i b 1 % ^ •ss No. Laboratory symbol. (U .Si .|l n ^1 S u V 1 kS g'a s-^ 0) -I « s 01 -S.S s c e: . a «* c 4-1 M 19 4.1 a $ u 4; t H a I a a H 1 a 86 aT as 29 30 31 3a 33 34 35 36 31 Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. L6j. L6i. Lbs. I.6J-. L6i. Lbs. Lbs. °F. 201 4(30-3-240) 10,980 24,120 35,100 169.S 3271 4966 659 183 62 447 2.61 666.4 202 1(30-3-240) 9,362 12,942 22,304 1461 2019 3480 661 160 35 461 2-59 725-3 203 4(30-5-200) 9,100 24,611 33,711 1.340 .3015 4355 645 159 58 331 2.70 664.5 204 1(30-5-200) 8,909 13.471 22,380 15 19 1771 3290 526 146 37 294 2.84 667.7 205 4(30-7-160) 8,891 25,022 33,913 1 162 .3427 4589 533 205 53 371 3-30 662.8 2osa 4(30-7-160) 8,798 24.113 32.911 I054 .H4I 4495 553 175 59 415 2.7b 661.2 206 1(30-7-160) 8,712 13.375 22,087 1275 1638 2913 499 115 29 339 2-43 648.5 207 4(30-10-120) 9,793 23,951 33,744 1242 3263 4505 441 208 55 410 2.73 637 -2 208 1(30-10-120) 8,450 13,345 21,795 1268 i8io|3078i 421 179 32 350 2.81 632.7 Table 31. — Boiler and engine performance (intermittent tests). Designation of test. Equivalent evaporation. ] Average indicated horse-power. CS .till a t a . .5 1 g Si a d bo C 1 e a cS 1 R 1 Average draw-bar horse-power. No. Laboratory symbol. bo .S v ^ J3 ^ 4 J •0 'o P. u Ibi (0 Pi c 0/ bo a ■5 -a-g .11 its g C bo 'i. Hi bo a a g tn'6 ." a> |l bo+J n cii a, "3 1 1 3 38 39 40 41 4a 43 44 45 46 47 48 201 202 203 204 205 2050 206 207 208 4(30-3-240) 1(30-3-240) 4(30-5-200) 1(30-5-200) 4(30-7-160) 4(30-7-160) 1(30-7-160) 4(30-10-120) 1(30-10-120) 6899 4405 6641 4410 6637 6438 4346 6577 4256 5 3 5 3 5 5 3 5 3 67 62 46 62 46 29 57 41 50 9 8 10 8 9 9 9 9 9 262 438 165 936 642 548 947 637 219 181.98 156.50 173-67 169.52 173-53 165.08 162.20 185.26 160 . 30 410.48 421 .00 446.63 455-93 437-21 426-39 425-83 391-69 406 . 80 319 288 337 312 331 321 294 309 283 08 81 44 72 74 86 01 10 60 4243 4066 4414 4243 3923 4136 4245 4470 4333 4148 4363 4736 ;6oi +670 4541 4557 4333 4406 156.70 144.36 160.30 161.23 166.88 151-83 158.40 177-05 161 .26 331-59 349-89 377-70 386.59 369.28 369.28 367.58 347-54 368.50 261 247 290 273 288 282 262 279 264 63 12 72 91 32 30 99 34 88 136 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 32. — Engine and locomotive performance {intermittent tests). Designation of test. Steam per I. H. P. per hour. Equivalent steam perD. H. P. per hour Dry coal per D. H. P. per hour. When When When Including No. Laboratory engine is For total engine is For total engine is For total coal used to symboL running time. running time. running time. raise steam- at speed. at speed. at speed. pressure. 1 » 49 50 51 53 53 54 55 201 i(3o-3-24o) 23-50 26.40 37.62 40.96 3-95 4-55 5-16 202 1(30-3-240) 23-05 28.97 35 85 42 55 4 33 5-28 6.28 203 K30-5-ZO0) 22.04 23.98 33 67 35 40 3 19 3.60 4-13 204 i(30-5-20o) 22 . 16 26.85 33 66 39 00 3 44 4-50 5-23 205 i(30-7-i6o) 22.89 24-54 34 7« 35 68 3 71 3-83 4.26 205a i(30-7-i6o) 22.63 24-55 33 59 35 39 3 73 3.82 4.29 206 i(30-7-i6o) 23-56 28.24 35 21 39 90 3 34 4-15 4.87 207 4(30-10-160) 24.47 26.21 35 40 36 68 3 76 3-87 4-25 208 i(30-io-i6o) 24.60 28.89 34 So 3« «9 3 68 4-36 4-95 Table 33. — Chemical analysis of smoke-box gases {intermittent tests). Designation of test. Gas analysis. Weight of — Ratio of air sup- Dry gas plied to per pound per Air per Air per theoreti- No. Laboratory symbol. C02. 0.. CO. N2. pound of pound of pound of com- cal re- quire- carbon. com- bustible carbon. bustible. ment. 1 8 56 57 58 69 60 61 63 63 64 P.ct. P. ct. P. ct. P. ct. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. 20I 4(30-3-240) 14.91 2.81 0.86 81.42 16. 12 11.72 15-65 11.38 I -15 202 1(30-3-240) 14.94 2.. 56 .70 81.80 16.25 10.57 15 85 10.30 I -15 203 i(30-5-200) 13-19 5-48 -45 80.88 18.53 13-34 17 97 12.93 1.32 204 i(3O-5-200) 12.48 6.00 .46 81.06 19-47 13.09 18 98 12.76 1-39 205 K30-7-I60) 12.08 6-95 -23 80.74 20.45 15.06 19 87 14-65 I-51 2050 K30-7-I60) 12.50 6.70 -15 80.65 19.94 14-50 19 32 14.06 1.46 206 : (30-7-160) 13-43 5-01 -33 81.23 18.14 11-77 17 89 II .61 1-30 207 J(30-I0-I20) 11.86 7.18 -19 80.77 20.87 15-09 20 31 14.70 1-50 208 i(30-I0-I20) 11.64 6.95 -14 81.27 21.32 13.82 20 91 13-57 1.48 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. 137 Table 34. — Clumical analysis uf coal (iiitcnniltcnl tcsls). Designation of test. Proximate analysis (coal as fired). Ultimate analysis (dry coal). No. Laboratory symbol. Moist- ure. Volatile matter. Fixed carbon. Ash. Carbon Hydro- gen. Nitro- gen. Oxy- i gen. p ul- lur. 73 92 1 Asli. 74 7.67 1 2 65 32 86 67 68 69 ■.0 71 73 6.49 201 4(30-3-240) 1.84 16 58-47 7-53 78.61 5 03 1.28 202 1(30-3-240) 1.84 32 55 58 03 7 58 78 51 5 03 61 6 14 98 7 73 203 4(30-5-200) 2.90 30 71 58 75 7 64 76 06 5 II 29 8.69 98 7 87 204 1(30-5-200) 2.19 31 96 58 73 7 12 78 41 5 13 70 6 53 94 / 28 205 4(30-7-160) I 59 32 52 56 23 9 66 77 31 4 qo 49 5 -|2 I 06 9 82 205a 4(30-7-160) 1-59 32 58 57 20 « 63 78 20 5 00 58 5 29 I 16 8 77 206 1(30-7-160) 2.56 i3' 55 58 50 |7 39 78 05 5 00 60 6 60 I 16 7 59 207 4(30-10-120) 1-65 131 53 58 21 '8 61 77 i8 5 06 54 6 34 I 13 8 75 208 i(30-io-i2o) 2.20 |3i 86 58.43 |7-5i 78 45 5 06 67 5 96 I 18 7 68 Table 35. — Calorific values {inter yniitent tests). Designation of test. Per cent combustible in — Calorific value in B. t. u. per pound of — No. Laboratory symbol. Front- end cinders. Stack cinders. Refuse from ash-pan. Dry coal. Com- bustible. Front- end cinders. Stack cinders. Refuse from ash-pan. 1 a 76 76 77 78 79 80 81 83 201 202 203 204 205 205a 206 207 208 4(30-3-240) 1(30-3-240) 4(30-5-200) 1(30-5-200) 4(30-7-160) 4(30-7-160) 1(30-7-160) 4(30-10-120) 1(30-10-120) 81 73 69 77 72 75 71 69 70 94 80 16 22 35 77 19 89 36 61 65 58 65 55 58 57 61 61 77 60 19 47 36 25 75 05 84 51 57 38 52 45 39 56 39 54 22 17 46 56 65 99 79 85 70 14,119 14,063 14,062 ■4,057 13,791 13.910 14,192 13.948 14,196 15,291 15,240 15,262 15,161 15,323 15,247 15,357 15,280 15.377 ",578 10,294 9.576 11,021 10,223 10,664 10,051 9,918 9.961 8676 9164 8127 9126 7803 8280 S113 8555 8660 7502 8374 5633 6687 5862 8318 5818 5837 8012 138 SUPURHBATBD STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE. Table 36. — Heat balance {intermittent tests). Designation of test. 3 ■SI E- h^ bS S« B'S E • E-i ^ 3 rt ^8 •-£ 8'§ 2 a; o.E •s_S si Z^ 1 0^ a '0 4,_- w •0 "2 s ^1 8 !r ii a £ ns rt fl « a tir^ 3 2 dp &| « 3 g P u §s 0, go gS g| gg •a !» oS ''o d A P,4J P."^ P