\n nVxI^ v^^ Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024756763 QH 581.f9™l878"'"^ """">' ,,&ell doctrine: 3 1924 024 756 763 ... THE CELL DOCTRINE. BY THE SAME AUTHOR. A GUIDE TO THE PRACTICAL EXAMINATION OF URINE. For the use of Physicians and Students. Illustrated. Second edition, revised and improved. Just ready. Price, ^1.25. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF PRACTICAL HIS- TOLOGY. For Beginners in Microscopy. Price, )J 1. 00; inter- leaved, Si-So- IN PREPARATION. A TREATISE ON DISEASES OF THE KIDNEYS, with especial reference to Pathology and Therapeutics. Fig. 1. Mg. S. ' Fig. 3. Youngest layer. Middle lay. Proiluction of formed material from germinal matter In Epitlieliai cells, ir ui sectioa tlirougli layer uf Epitbelium coveriug papillso oftlie tongue. X700. Fig 7. ' ' ""j Fig. 10. ^//^>f^ FORMATIOW OP PUS. To illustrate the change in germinal matter of an Enithelial cell, resulting from increased nutrition, sbowing the manaer In whioti the (fei'iuliial inacCBi- qi a normal cell, If supplied frcelv with pabulum, may give rise to pus. a, SarCOl&miua, h, Cmitraetile matter. MUSCLE. Young. Fully fonr"1. Young. Fully formtsj. TENDON. CAllTILAGE, ELASTIC TISSUE. The arrow showi the directiuii i>i which germiual niaiter io ^^pt)osed to be movmg. i Dsvalopment of Toune, dark -bordered iierve flbres, at an early ^itii-iod, ahowmg (^ermiiULl matter oud fbrmed material of eiGmentaiT parte, x 1800, fig. 17. >Ma?BA. Pure Knrmiiial matter. X5000. New centre or nudeoluH (xermiuulmaLter(nucleus)._ Olftr^t T art of formed 111 Li -lal. ^'unijeat pnrt of :^_ li "II ed maiepial. Course of pabulum. jg^^^^^T^-^ PLATE ILLUSTRATING DR. BEALE'S VIEWS. THE CELL DOCTRINE: ITS HISTORY AND PRESENT STATE. FOR THE USE OF STUDENTS IN MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY. ALSO, A COPIOUS BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE^ SUBJECT. By JAMES TYSON, M.D., PROFESSOR OF GENERAL PATHOLOGY AHD MORBID ANATOMY IN THE UNIVER- SITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ; ONE OF THE VICE-PRESIDENTS OF THE PATHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ; ONE OF THE VISITING PHYSICIANS TO THE PHILADELPHIA HOSPITAL ; FELLOW OE THE COLLEGE OP PHYSICIANS, PHILADELPHIA; ETC., ETC., ETC. SECOND EDITION, REVISED, CORRECTED, AND ENLARGED. ILLUSTRATED. PHILADELPHIA: LINDSAY & BLAKISTON. 1878. CORNELL^ UNIVERSITY LjBRAR\V Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1878, Br LINDSAY & BLAEISTON, In the Ofi&ce of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. CAXTON PRESS OP SHERMAN & CO., PHILADELPHIA. JX THE MEDICAL CLASS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, aci)i6 Cittle ibolume IS RESPECTP-ULLY INSCRIBED, BY THE AUTHOR. PEEFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. The highly favorable and quite unexpected reception accorded the first edition of this book has stimulated my interest in the subject, and in preparing a second, I have sought to improve it as much as possible. In doing so, many of the original sources of my information have been re-examined, and from them some additions made and inaccuracies corrected. The section on the Present State of the Cell Dootritie, incorporating my own views, has been entirely rewritten, as was necessitated by the very important and numerous contributions to the subject since the first edition appeared. The bibliography has been increased by the addition of over three hundred and fifty new references, mostly to papers contributed directly on the subject since the first edition was issued. To make room for these, many of the references included in the bibliography of the first edition have been omitted where there did not seem to be a sufficiently close bearing on the subject. Vlll PRKFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. The suggestion of one of the reviewers of the first edi- tion, that the bibliography should be chronologically in- stead of alphabetically arranged was carefully considered, and at one time I had concluded to adopt it, but when I attempted to do so, I found that the inconvenience resulting from the wide separation of several papers by a single author, more than oflfeet the advantages of a chronological arrangement. I therefore adhered to the original plan. For valuable assistance in collecting references and examination of papers I am greatly indebted to my as- sistant. Dr. H. F. Formad. 1506 SPBrcE Street, October 1st, 1878. PEEFACE TO THE FIEST EDITION. The author has become convinced, by several years' intimate intercourse with students of medicine, that their acquaintance with the subjects he has endeavored to in- clude in this little volume would be facilitated, if the views, which are now taught and scattered throughout the often expensive works of their authors, were collected in a convenient form for study and reference. Taking it for granted that a knowledge of this subject is of fun- . damental importance in its bearing upon the study of physiology and pathology, and stimulated by the frequent inquiries of students for an appropriate source of infor- mation, he has prepared what he now submits to them. He has sought to obtain a continuous history of the evolution of the " cell doctrine " up to its present state, without embarrassing his pages with a large number of isolated facts. He has attempted, however, to secure a completeness, and to make the work useful to physicians X PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. and others engaged in research, by careful references, and the addition of a bibliography, which he has sought to make accurate and extended. Some authors may have been overlooked; such the writer cordially invites to send him references to their own papers, or to those of others they believe to have a bearing upon the subject. ILLUSTRATIONS. Plate. — Illusteatistg Db. Bbale's Views. Figs. 1 to 7. Production of formed material from germinal matter in epithelial cells, from section through layer of epithelium covering papillae of tongue. Figs. 7 to 11. Formation of Pus. Fig. 11. a " Tendon. Fig. 12. a " Cartilage. Fig. 13. Cl " Muscle. Fig. 14. n " Elastic Tissue Fig. 15. it " Nerve. Fig. 16. Amoeba. Pig. 17. Illustrating Nutrition of Cell. Intercalated. Fig. 1. Illustrating Globular Theory. After Virchow. Fig. 2. Cellular Tissue from the Embryo Sac of Chamsedorea Schie- deana in the act of formation. After Schleiden. Fig. 3. From the Point of a Branchial Cartilage of Eana Esculenta. After Schwann. ■ Figs. 4 to 12. Formation of Nuclei and Cells from Molecules, accord- ing to Bennett. XU ILLUSTRATIONS. Fig. 12. Diagram of the Investment Theory. From Virchow. Fig. 13. Formation of Pus from subcutaneous connective tissue. From Virchow. Fig. 14. Formation of Pus from interstitial connective tissue of mus- cle. From Virchow. Fig. 15. Development of Cancer from connective tissue. From Vir- chow. Fig. f6. Connective Tissue Corpuscles anastomosing one with the other. From Virchow. Fig. 17. Formation of Elastic Tissue, according to Virchow. Fig. 18. Formation of Connective Tissue, according to Schwann and Henle. From Virchow. Fig. 19. Formation of Connective Tissue, according to Virchow. From Virchow. 1^ THE CELL DOCTRINE. The idea that animals and plants, however com- plex their organization, are really composed of a limited variety of elementary parts, constantly re- curring, was appreciated by Aristotle, who was born 384 years before Christ, while it appears to have been little more clearly conceived by the acknowl- edged father of medical science, Galen, who lived 400 years later. Aristotle distinguished as " partes ^ similares," those structures, such as bone, cartilage, fat, flesh, blood, lymph, nerve, ligament, tendon, membrane, vessels, nails, hairs, and skin, which were not confined to one part of the body, but distributed throughout it generally. He applied the term "partes dissimilares " to the regions of the head, neck, trunk, and extremities. Fallopius of Modena, 1523-1562, to whom we are indebted for our knowledge of the conceptions of Galen in regard to these " partes similares " or " simplices," has fur- ther developed the subject of general anatomy in his " Lectiones de Partibus Similaribus Humani Corpo- ris." These, however, plainly do not correspond with the " elementary parts " or " cells " of the pres- ent day. As Prof. Huxley says in his valuable essay 2 14 THE CELL DOCTRINE. on "The Cell Theory," they were ultimate to Fallo- pius, because he could go no further, " though it is, of course, a very cliflferent matter whether we are stopped by the imperfection of our instruments of analysis, as these older observers were, or by having really arrived at parts no longer analyzable."* These " partes similares " really correspond to the " tissues " of the present day, which are collections of elementary parts. The conceptions of these older writers with regard to the " vital endowment " or " independent vitality " of their similar parts or tissues, were sin- gularly correct, and correspond almost identically with those held by the majority of physiologists of the present day. Further than this, however, the anatomists of the period of Fallopius could not go — not because, as we now well know, they had arrived at parts no longer analyzable, but because of their imperfect means of analysis. It is probable that the magnifying properties of lenses were known to the Egyptians, as well as the Greeks and Romans, over 2000 years ago ; since a table of refractive powers is introduced into his "Optics" by Ptolemy, since Aristophanes, the Athenian poet (B.C. 500), speaks of "burning spheres" of glass as sold in the grocers' shops of Athens, and since both Pliny and Seneca refer to lenses and their magnifying properties ; while lenses themselves have been found in the ruins of Nineveh, * The Cell Theory— a Keview, by T. H. Huxley ; Br. and For- eign Med. Chir. Kev. for October 1853, No. xxiv. THE CELL DOCTRINE. 15 Herciilaneum, and Pompeii. But it is quite certain, also, that they did not become available as com- pound microscopes until about 1590, when the Jan- sens, father and son, of Holland, are said to have in- vented the compound microscope. Fontana, in 1646, writes that he had invented the microscope in 1618. Galileo, as early as 1612, is said to have sent a micro- scope to.King Sigismund of Poland, though whether it was his own invention, or made after the pattern of another, is not easily determined. In 1685, Stelluti published a description of the parts of a bee he had examined with the microscope, and although' George Hufnagle is said to have published in Frank- fort, in 1592, a work upon insects, illustrated by fifty copper plates, it is highly probable that these, as well as very many most important observations made after the invention of the compound microscope, were made with the simple instrument.* It is impossible to estimate the assistance the microscope has been to us in opening up the minute structure of animals and vegetables, and in thus af- fordins; a reliable basis on which to build a doctrine of organization. Prof, lluxley further says, " The influence of this mighty instrument of research upon biology, can only be compared to that of the galvanic battery, in the hands of Davy, upon chemistry. It has enabled •proximate analysis to be ultimate."\ But it is more than this. Since, as he correctly states, it * Piir Hn interesting and exhaustive history of the invention of the compound mici-oseopp, see Das Mikroskop, Theorie, Gebrauch, Geseliic'hte und gegenwartiger Zustand dessclben. Von P. Hurting. In drei Bandon. Braunschweig, 1866. Dritter Band, ss. 1-35. f Huxley, loc. citat., p. 290. 16 THE CELL DOCTEINE, has enabled proximate physical analysis to become ultimate, it corresponds, not to the galvanic battery alone, but to all the appliances made use of in ulti- mate chemical analysis. The time prior to the invention of the compound microscope may be considered as the first period in histology ; that between this date and that of the ob- servations of Schleiden and Schwann (1838), inclu- sive, the second period ; while the time subsequent to these observations becomes appropriately the third period. Notwithstanding the imperfect state of in- struments during quite two hundred years after the invention of the compound microscope, a flood of facts was added to oar knowledge of the minute structure of living things, Borellus, of Pisa, seems first to have used the mi- croscope in the examination of the higher animal structures, about the year 1656, but his observations were grossly misinterpreted in his attempt to adapt them to the prevailing idea of the day, that diseases were caused by animalculse in the blood and tissues. As a result, he describes pus-corpuscles as animalcules, and even says he has seen them delivering their eggs. According to Boerhaave, Swammerdam had recog- nized the blood-corpuscle in the frog in 1658. Malpighi,* between 1661 and 1665, had seen the blood -corpuscle in the hedge-hog, had witnessed the circulation of the blood, and had published observa- tions upon the minute structure of the lungs, which he had even compared to a racemose gland,t of the * Malpighi, Opera Omnia. London, 1686. t Fort, Anatomie et Physiologie du Poumon, considere comme THE CELL DOCTRINE. 17 kidneys, spleen, liver, and membranes of the brain, and with some of these structures his name has become inseparably associated. In 1667, Robert "i Ilooke* pointed out the cellular structure of plants, and Malpighif further elaborated the same subject with considerable accuracy in his " Anatome Planta- rnm," in 167i>. He showed that the walls of the " cells " or " vesicles," were separable, that they could be isolated, and gave to each the name " utrioulus" believing also the " cell," or " utriculus," tb be an independent entity. The latter observer;]: also recog- nized the blood corpuscle. Leeuwenhoek, in 1673,§ described these corpuscles with considerable accuracy, not only in man, but also in the lower animals. He also demonstrated the capillaries, examined most of the tissues, and made the discovery of the sperma- tozoids, which he conceived to be spermatozoa or sperm animals, and of diiJerent sexes. Theory of Sailer, 1757. — N"o attempt, however, seems to have been intelligently made at building up the tissues by an ultimate physical element, to cor- respond with the " atom " of the inorganic chemist, prior to that of Haller. He resolved the solid parts of animals and vegetables into the '■'■fibre" {fibra), un organe de Secretion. Piivis, 1867, Preface; or a notice of Dr. Fort's book, by the writer, in American Journal of Medical Sciences, October, 1869. * Hooke, Rob., Micrographia. London, 1C67. ^ f Slalpighi, Anatome Plantarura. London, 1670. X Malpighi, Opera Posthuma. London, 1697. g Leeuwenhoelj, Opera Omnia seu Arcana Naturas detecta. Tom. ii, p 421. Leyden, 1687. Vel Opera Omnia, etc., Lugd. Batav., 1722. 2* 18 THE CELL DOCTRINE. and an " organized concrete." To the former he as- signs the most important position, asserting that it is to the physiologist what the line is to the geome- trician ; that a "fibre," in general, may be con- sidered as resembling a line made up of points, having a moderate breadth, or rather as a slender cylinder.* The second elementary substance of the human ' body according to Haller, the " organized concrete," must not be lost sight of, as appears to have been the case with many eminent authorities who have attempted to give his views. This, he says, is a mere glue, evasated and concreted, not within the fibres, but in the spaces betwixt them, in illustration of which it is stated, that cartilages seem, to be scarcely anything else besides this glue concreted. But these views of Haller were clearly not based upon microscopic observation, though the microscope had been for some time in use. For Haller himself tells us that the fibre is invisible, and to be distinguished only by the "mind's eye," — invisihilis est ea Jibra, sold mentis acie distinguimus.\ No allusion, to the cell beyond the imperfect description of the blood- * Haller, Elementa Physiologise, vol. i, lib. i, sec. i. Lausan., Helvet.,1757. ■j- A singular discrepancy exists between these words of Haller and those found in both the Latin and English editions of the " elegant compend " of Haller's works printed in Edinburgh, the former in 1766, and the latter (an edition in the possession of the writer), in 1779, under the inspection of William CuUen, M.D. In the latter, we have the following : " The solid parts of animals and vegetables have this fabric in common, that their elements, or THE CELL DOCTRINE. 19 corpuscles and spermatozoids appears to have been made by Haller. Theory of Wolff, 1759-74.~Better founded, in being based upon observation, was the theory of Wolff, and it contained many of the elements of truth. For an available exposition of these views, physiologists are much indebted to Prof Huxley, who in the able review already cited, has pre- sented them as agreeing partially, also, with his own. The doctrine of Wolff, as given by Prof. Huxley, is as follows : " Every organ is composed, at first, of a mass of clear viscous, nutritive fluid, which . possesses no organization of any kind, but is at most composed of globules. In this semifluid mass, cavi- ties (Blaschen, Zellen) are now developed ; these, if they remain rounded or polygonal, become the sub- sequent cells, if they elongate, the vessels ; and the process is identically the same, whether it is ex- amined in the vegetating point of a plant, or in the young budding organs of an animal. Both cells and vessels may subsequently be thickened by deposits from the ' solidescible ' nutritive fluid. In the plant, the cells at first communicate, but subsequently be- come separated from one another ; in the animal, they always remain in communication. In each case,, they are mere cavities and not independent entities ; or- ganization is not effected by them, hut they are the visible results of the action of the organizing power inherent in the smallest parts we can see hy the finest microscope, diVe either fibres or an organized concrete.'" ' First Lines of Physiology. By the celebrated Baron Albertus Haller, M.D. Translated from the correct Latin edition, and printed under the. inspection of William Cullen, M.D. Edinburgh, 1779. 20 THE CELL DOCTRINE. the living mass, or what Wolft' calls the vis essentialis. For him, however, this vis essentialis is no Archceus, hut simply a convenient name for two facts which he takes a great deal of trouble to demonstrate ; the first, the existence in living tissues (before any pas- sages are developed in them), of currents of the nu- tritious fluid determined to particular parts by some power which is independent of all external influence ; and the second, the peculiar changes of form and composition, which take place in the same manner."* 'Two points are here particularly to be observed as cardinal, — first, the non-independence of cells, either anatomically or physiologically ; that they are effects, passive 'results, and not muses of a vitalizing or or- ganizing force ; second, that organization takes place from the " differentiation " of the homogeneous living mass in these parts, through the agency of the vis .essentialis or inherent vital force. The radical difterence between these principles of development and those generally held at the present day, will be better appreciated when these latter have been worked out. An acknowledged error may, however, be pointed out, — the probable result of the inferiority of the instruments of that day — that of supposing the cells of plants and animals in all instances to communicate when in their youngest state, and in the latter to continue thus in communication through- ,out life. It will be observed, also, that this theory involved the spontaneous origin of the cell, that is, independent of any previously existing cell. * Huxley, loo. citat., p. 293-4. Wolff, 0. P., Theoria Genera- tionis, 1769. Ed. Nova, Halae, 1774. THE CELL DOCTRINE. 21 The theory of Wolff, however, full as it was of origi- nal conception, and based on actual observation, seemed to claim little attention, and would have been still less known but for the labors of Prof. Huxley. The " fibre " theory of Haller was still further expanded, and that fibres were the groundwork of nearly all the tissues, continued the prevailing view, until the latter part of the eighteenth century, and there are few of the older Physiologies even of a later date, which do not contain an account of it. IsTaturally, it maintained itself longest in the case of the fibrous tissues, since the appearances of these tissues, when examined by the highest powers, are those of struc- tures apparently composed of fibres. Oken, 1808 .-^The first clear expression with regard to the cellular or vesicular composition of animal or- ganisms as well as vegetable, comes from the physical school in the language of Oken, who, as early as 1805, in his work on " Generation," refers to elemen-~' tary parts as " vesicles;" and who says in his " Pro- gramm fiber das Universum " in 1808, " The first transition of the inorganic to the organic is the con- version into a vesicle (Blaschen), which I, in my theory of generation, have called infusorium. Ani- mals and plants are throughout nothing else than mani- foldly divided or repeating vesicles, as I shall prove anatomically at the proper time." This most ex- plicit statement seems also to have been overlooked. The Globular Theory, 1779-1842.-.-The reaction which took place at the date referred to against the ■ " fibre " theory, culminated in the " globular '' theory,' due less to speculation than erroneous methods of ob- 22 THE CELL DOCTRINE. * servation and imperfect instruments. Leeuwenhoek* (1687) early announced the "globular" structure of the primitive tissues of the body, but the " globule" apparently attracted little notice until this period of reaction against the " fibre," when it claimed the attention of Proehaskaf (1779), Fontana:): (1778), the brothers Wenzelg (1812), Treviranus|| (1816),Eauerl (1818 and 1823), Heusinger** (1822), MM. Prevost and Dutnas,tt Milne- Ed wards ft (1823), Hodg- kin§§ (1829), Baumgartner|l|| (1830-42), Frederick * Lceuwenhoek, op. citat. f Proehaska, De Structura Nervorum. Vind., 1779. Opera min., Piirs i. J Fontana, Sur les Poisons, 1787, ii, 18; Abhandlung tiber das Viperngift, das Amerikanische Gift, u. s. w. Aus dem Italian. Berlin, 1787. § Wenzel, Joseph and Charles. De structura cerebri. Tubing., 1812. * II Treviranus, Vermischte Schriften, Anatom. und Physiolog. Inhalts Bd. i. Gottingen, 1816. T[ Bauer, Philosoph. Transac. for 1818, and SirE. Home's Lec- tures oil Comparative Anatomy, vol. iii, Lect. iii. London, 1823. ** Hi'usinger, System der Histolngie. Thl. i Eisenauh, 1822-4 ft MM. Prevost and Dumas, Bibliothdquo Universulle des Sci- ences et Arts, T. xvii. Xt Milne-Edwards, M^moire sur la Structure Elementairo des Principaiix Tissues Organiques des Animaux. Paris, 1823. Also, Eecherches Microscopiques sur la Structure Intime des Tissues Or- ganiques des Animaux, in Ann. des Sci. Nat. December, 1826. ?§ Hodgkin, in Grainger's Elemontsof General Anatomy. Lon- don, 1829. Also Hodgkin and Fisher's translation of M. Edwards " Sur les Agens Physiques." London, 1832. Hodgkin's Lectures on the Morbid Anatomy of the Serous and Mucous Membranes. London, 1836, p. 26. Am. Ed., Philadelphia, 1838, vol. i, pp. ■17-18. nil Baumgartner, K. H., Beobachtungen uber "die Nerven und das Blut in ihrem gesundcn und Krankhalten Zustande, February, THE CELL DOCTRINE. 23 Arn9ld* (1836), Dutrochett (1837), EaspailJ (1839); all except Hodgkin admitting in greater or less de- gree the importance of the globule as an ultimate phys- ical element ; while it is evident, also, that there was much confusion in the use of terms, the words globule, granule, and ynolecule,^ being often indiscrimi- nately used, and the word globule sometimes used to indicate what is now clearly recognized as the " cell." 1830. His views are further elaborated in his Beitiage zur Phy- siologic und Anatomie. Aus der Lehre von der Gegensazen in den Kraften in lebenden thierschen Korper, ein Grundriss zur Physiologie und zur allgenieinen Pathologie und Therapie, 2te Auflage, besonders abgcdruikt. Stuttgart, 1842. * Arnold, Friedreich, Lehrbuch der Phj'siologie des Menschen. Erst. Thnil, Zurich, 1836. f Dutrochet, Memoires pour servir a I'Histoire Anatomique et Physiologique des Vegetaux et des Animaux, t. ii. Atlas. Paris, 1837. J Raspail, Eechereh. sur la struct, et le developm. de la feuille et du tronc, et sur la struct., etdevel. des tissus Animale, Paris, 1837. I The German authors of this period, and even more recent times (Henle, 1841, Virchow, 1858), at least in speaking of the development of histology, seem to use indiscriminately the terms granule or molecule and globule, whereas they s.,v