Cornell University Library PA 3002.L88 A history of Greek and Roman classical I 3 1924 022 688 877 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924022688877 A HISTORY GREEK AND ROMAN CLASSICAL LITEEATUEE. BT REV. A. LOUAGE, C. S. C, PBOFBBSOB OF A170IENT CLAfiSIOAL LITEBATUBE AT NOTBE-DAME inTIVEBSnT, INDIANA. NEW YORK: D. APPLETON AND COMPANY, 649 AHD 551 BROADWAY. isjra. Entered, aceordiBg to Act of GongresB, in the year 1878, By p. APPLETON & CO., In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Waehingtou. PEEFAO E. Having to teach the class of ancient literature at the University of Notre-Dame, I in vain looked for a text-book for my pupils and for myself, and could not find any thing which would answer either my purpose, or the programme, such as I had conceived it. I found, among the books composing the classical department of the library, two volumes, in octavo, by K. "W. Browne, on Greek and Koman classical literature. This work, which is deserving of much praise, was too extensive, and not systematic enough, in order to be given as a text-book. The " Classical Dictionary " of Anthon, and the one of Lempriere, both works of much eru- dition, would not answer my purpose either. I then set to work, and, taking the divisions of Browne, I collected information from the three writers named above, and also from some bibliographical articles found at the head of some editions of classical books, accepted as text-books in all the colleges of this coun- try, and composed the present compendium, which I 4 PREFACE. give as a "Manual," and which contains the history of ancient Greek and Eoman classical literature. The quality whicli I hope will be found in this work, and which, in my estimation, is the most im- portant, is exactness. The indulgence of the reader is requested for many deficiencies in the style. Our main desire is to be useful, and to secure for our eflEbrts the blessing of God. S. BT. D. B. CONTENTS, PART I. GKEEK CLASSICAL LITEKATUKE. PASS Preliminaries, 11 BOOK I. FIRST PERIOD OF THE mSTORT OF TBE OLASSIOAL_ LITERATURE OF GREECE. Chapter I. — Greek Pobtbt before Homer. Orpheus, Eumolphus, Thamyris, Olen, Chryaothemis, Fhilammon —The Muses 16 Ceapter n. — ^Epic Poetrt. Homer — Is he the author of the " Hiad " and the " Odyssey ? " . 17 Chapter m. Argument of the "Hiad," 20 Chapter IV. — ^Didactic Poetry. Hesiod, Arctinus of l^etus, Lesches of Lesbos, Agiaa of Troezen, Eumelus of Corinth, Strasinus of Cyprus, .... 26 Chapter V. — Elegiac and Iambic Poetry. Callinus of Epheaus, Tyrtseus, Archiloohus of Paros, Simonides of Amorgos, Mimnermus of Smyrna, Theognia, Xenophanes of .^lea, Phocylidea of Miletus, Hipponax of Ephesus, .^sop— Music at that Period in Greece — Terpander, , , , ,28 6 ■ CONTENTS. Chapter VI. — ^Lyrio Poetry. Piei, EumeluB, Alcman, Arion, Alcseus, Sappho, Erinna, Stesichorus, Ibycns, Anacreon, Simonides, Bacchylides, Corinna, Pindar, . 31 Chapter VII. — Prose Writers : Laws, History. Periander, Pittacus, Thales, Solon, Cleobulus, Bias, Chilo, Cad- mus, Acusilaus, Hecateus, 89 Chapter VIII. — ^Pkosb, Philosophy. Pherecydes of Syros, Thales, Anaximander, Anaxlmenes, Diogenes, Anaxagoras, Heraelitus, Archelaus, Pythagoras, Xenophanea, 42 BOOK n. SECOND PERIOD OF TBB BISTORT Of TEE CLASSICAL LITEBA- TURE OF GREECE. Chapter I. — ^Dramatic Style: its Infancy. The Age of Plsistratus — The Drama — Nature of Dramatic Poetry — Thespis, Phrynicus, Chserilus, Pratinas, .... 48 Chapter II. — ^Dramatic Style: its Perfection. JSschylus, Sophocles — Their compositions, 61 Chapter III. — Edripides and the Last Tragic Writers of This Period — The Theatre. Euripides, Ion, Achseus, Agathon, Chseremon, Theodectes — The Theatre in Greece, . . .67 Chapter IV. — Comedy. Susarion, Epicharmus, Posidippus, Phormis, Dinolochus, Chionides, Cratinus, Eupolia, Crates, Aristophanes, .... 64 Chapter V. — Prose, History. Pherecydes of Leros, Charon, HellanieuB, Xanthus, Herodotus, . 1% Chapter VI. — Prose, History. Thucydides, Xenophon, Ctesias, Philistus, Theopompus, Ephorus the historian of Alexander 78 CONTENTS. >i Chapter VII. — ^Prose, ELOttUENCE. p^qj, Corax, Tisias, Gorgias, Antiphon, Andocides, Lysias, Isocrates, laseus, ^schinea, Lycurgus, Demosthenes, Hyperides, Dinar- chus, Semades 86 Chapter VIII. — ^Pbose, Philosophy. The Sophists — Diogenes of Apollonia, Anaxagoras, Farmeiiides, Zeno, Melissus, Empedooles, Socrates — The Cyrenaio School : Aristippus — The Meqario School: Euclid of Megara — The Cynic School : Antisthenes, and Diogenes the Cynic — The Old Academy : Plato, Spensippus, Xenocrates, Polemo — The Peri- patetic School : Aristotle, Theophrastus — The Stoic School : Zeno — The Skeptical School : Pyrrho — The Epicurean School : Epicurus, 99 PART II. ROMAN CLASSICAL LITBRATUKE. Preliminaries, 109 BOOK I. TME FIRST MBA. Chapter I. — Prose and Poetry. First Essays in Prose and Poetry before Livius Andronicus — ^First Songs — Satumian Verse — Historical Records — " Fescennine Songs"— "The LudiOsoii," lU Chapter II. — Dramatic Style in the First Era. Livius Andronicus, Cneius Nsevius, Ennius, 117 Chapter III. — Comedy. T. Maccius Plautus, Csecilius Statins, P. Terentius Afer, L. Afra- nius, P. Licinius Tegula, Lavinius Luscius, Q. Trabea, S. Turpilius, 122 Chapter IV. — Saiibio Draua, Satibe. M. Facuvius, L. Attius, C. Lucilius, . ... . . .130 8 CONTENTS. Chapter V. — ^Pbose, Histokt. p^aa Q. Fabius Fictor, L. Cincius Alimentus, Acilius Glubrio, M. Forcius Cato Censorinus, Hemina, Fabius Masimua Servilianus, Fau- nius, Vennonius, F. Sempronius Asellio, C. Julias Gracchanus, S. Fabius Fictor, Calpumius Fiso Censorius, ^milius Scaurus, Rutilius Rufus, SuUa, Maoer, C. Quadrigarius, Valerius Antlas, Cornelius Sisenna, ^lius Tubero, 134 Chapieb YI. — Fbose, Floquekce, Gbaidiabiaiib. M. Antonius Crassus, L. Liciniua Crassus, Q. Hortensius, Lenseus, Servius Clodius, .^lius Stilo, Valerius Cato 138 BOOK n. TBH GOLDEN AGE— ERA OF OIOEBO AND AUOmTUS. ChAPTEB I. — ^FOETET. Section I. — Writers of Mimes : Decius Laberius, C. Matius, Publius Syrus, . . .143 n. — Elegiac Poetry: C. Valerius Catullus, Albiua TibuUus, S. Aurelius Fropertius, C. Cornelius Gallus, . . 144 III. — E^rammaiic and Didactic Poetry : C. Cilnius Maece- nas, 0. Valgius Rufus, L. Varius Rufus, iEmilius Ma- cer, Ovidius Naso, Gratius Falisous, Pedo Albinova- nus, A. Sabinus, H. Manilius, .... 149 IV. — Epic Poetry: Lucretius Carus, P. VirgUius Maro, . 164 \.-rDidaclic and Lyric Poetry : Horatius Flaocus, . . 163 Chaptee n. — ^Frose, Eloquence. M. Tullius Cieero, Asinius FoUio, Terentius Varro, . . . 169 Chapter HI. — Frose, History. L. Lucceius, L. Licinius LucuUus, Cornelius Nepos, C. Julius Caesar, C. Sallustius Crispus, Trogius Pompeius, T. Livius Fatavinus, tt. Nitruvius FoUio, Atteius Fhilologus, Staberius Eros, Q. Cse- ciliuB Epirota, C. Julius Hyginus, Verrius Flaccus, Q. Corni- fioius, P. Nigidius Figulus, 1V6 CONTENTS. 9 BOOK m. THE SILVER ABE. Chapter I. — Poktrt. pAes Section I. — Fables : Phsedrus, 188 11. — Satires: Aulus Persius Flaccus, Decius Junius Juvenal, 190 III. — Hpic Style: M. Annaeus Lucanus, C. Silius Italicus, 0. Valerius Flaccus, P. Papinius Statins, Domitian, . 192 rV. — Epigrams: M. Valerius Martialis, .... 19? Chapter II. — ^Prose, History. Velleius Paterculus, Valerius Maximus, C. Cornelius Tacitus, Sue- tonius Tranquillus, Q. Curtius Kufus, L. Annaeus Floras, . 199 Chapter III. — ^Prose, Philosophers and Grammarians. M. Annseus Seneca, L. Anneeus Seneca, C. Plinius Secundus (the Elder), C. Plinius Caecllius Secundus (the Younger), M. Fabius Quintilianus, Aurelius Cornelius Celsus, Scribonius Largus De- signatianus, Fomponius Mela, L. Junius Moderatus Columella, Sextus Julius Frontinus, Aulus Gellius, Appuleius, Petronius, Lactantius, 204 APPENDIX. Theocritus, Lucian, Plutarch, St. John Chrysostom, . . . 21? PART I. GKEEK CLASSICAL LITEEATUEE. PRELIMINA BIES. The classical literature of Greece first engages at- tention because it is the oldest in Europe, and has been the source from which Eome derived its mental cul- ture. Greece must be viewed in two different aspects : first, in its oneness as a nation ; second, in its siibdi- visions into different races. In every thing which re- lates to Greece, we find a tendency to union, and an insurmountable principle of disunion and division of races. Each writer has common sympathies, but each one also exhibits in his productions the character of his race. Differences are found between the loni- ans, -iEolians, Dorians, and Sicilians. The lonians show a refined and energetic mind, and reach perfec- tion in every department of literature but the lyric. The Dorians and the .^olians show more disposition to enthusiasm, and among them poets are found who will win the crown in lyric poetry, and in the dithy- rambic chorus ; but perfection in the chorus has been attained only by the Attic or Ionian dramatists. Greek literature has been imitated but not equalled. Greek literature is admirable, not only as presenting a 12 GREEK CLASSICAL LITERATURE. picture of the human intellect in its highest state of perfection, but also for its moral value. Each writer writes not for personal glory, but in the discharge of a duty, in the performance of a mission — ^that of stirring the religious and national feelings of the Greeks. The. history of the classical literature of Greece should comprise only the history of the period when that literature reached its perfection, and consequently the period of the Pisistratidse ; but we will here con- sider also the period of the infancy of that literature, and divide this study into two books. In the first book we will examine the history of the infancy of the Greek literature, until the period of the Pisistratidse, about 650 years b. o. ; and, in the second book, we will consider the period which is called that of the Pisistra- tidse, which extends itself until the supremacy of Mace- don completes the destruction of the autonomy of Greece, about 300 years b. o. Language being the material of literature, it will be necessary to say something about the formation of the Greek language. Two families separated in the plains of Armenia : the Semitic occupied the south of Asia and the north of Africa ; the Indo-European spread itself in the west- ern part of Asia, and along the shores of the Black and Caspian Seas, penetrating into the northern part of Europe. To the Indo-European race we are in- debted for the vocabulary and grammatical structure of the languages of civilized Europe ; to the Semitic we owe the alphabet, and the means of committing ideas to writing. But while the Semitic race possessed, far earlier than the Indo-European, a phonetic alphabet PKELIMINAEIES. 13 of such power and perfection as to satisfy the require- ments of both races, and to be capable of expressing and representing every sound, its comparative supe- riority ends here. The varied structure of the Indo- European languages, the power of combination in their elements, the perfection of their grammatical prin- ciples, endow them with greater capacity for forming a widely-diffused and extended literature. In the Semitic languages the roots are few in num- ber, and composed of only two or three letters, and the formation of words, by means of prefixes and affixes, is simple and in most cases similar ; hence, although there are weight and dignity, there is an absence of that variety of sound, which, in the classical languages, falls so agreeably on the ear. Doubtless the Greeks were distinguished by a vast amount of mental energy and subtlety of discrimina- tion ; but it is clear that the accommodating structure of the Indo-European languages was a powerful instru- ment to mould and educate their mental powers. The ear, even of the uninitiated, is struck with the harmonious variety perceptible in the Greek language, and its fitness at once for the loftiest strains of heroic and dithyrambic poetry, the sweet pathos of the lyric muse, the rhythmical character of oratorical prose composition, and the simple familiarity and elegant perspicuity of narrative and conversation. The Pelasgi were the tribes which settled earliest in Greece. They were allied to the Iranian tribes in the north of India, and consequently that element in the Greek language which exhibits an affinity for the Sanscrit, is the Pelasgic, and hence the numerous re- ]4 GREEK CLASSICAL LITEEATURE. semblances in words and inflections which are found to exist between the two languages. The Hellenes, who occupied, according to the testimony of several writers, and especially of Herodotus, a portion of Thes- saly, penetrated farther into Greece, and mixed them- selves with the inhabitants of the country ; and the Hellenic element, being added to the other, caused the older Pelasgian language to be looked upon as bar- barous, when the Hellenes, who were an Ionian race, became the possessors of Attica. This element of the Greek language is said to have had an affinity to the Persian. The names given to the differMit tribes of Greece have been differently explained; probably the way of explaining their origin, by making them come from the appellations of the chiefs, is not an accurate one. We may find a more plausible explanation, drawing them from circumstances of place, etc. : thus, the word Dorian comes from Tor, or Taurus, which signifies mountain. The Dorians were the inhabitants of the mountainous districts ; that race emigrated afterward into Peloponnesus. The word Ionian comes from 'Hmp (shore). The lonians settled along the sea-shore, and the word ^olians comes from AloKeii (mixture) — the ^olian being composed of the Hellenic and Pelasgic element. Some authors pretend that the Semitic races had a written language long before the Indo-European races, and attribute to that circumstance the absence of liter- ature, at least of poetry, among them. It might, with as much plausibility, be attributed to the soft nature .of those people. BOOK I. FmST PERIOD OF THE HISTORY OF THE GLASSICAi LITERATURE OF GREECE. CHAPTEE I. GEEEK POETEY BEFOEE HOMEE. PoETET is the earliest species of literature ; it is the natural outpouring of the heart. Prose requires more intellectual development. In grief or joy we like to sing. The first verses were hymns to the divinity. Poetry, at the beginning, realized the definition of Strabo : 'H •jToirjTUcij watra vfivrjnie^. The first developments of Greek poetry were im- mediately connected with religion ; and that worship, the enthusiastic devotion of which was embodied in poetry, was the worship of If ature. The Greeks were inhabiting a land well suited to nurture and foster the fancy and imagination. The legend of Linus, which is found in the " Lam- entations of the Bards," nnder the heading of "At Alve" symbolized the withering and perishing of Na- ture's life and vigor. Hesiod says of Linus : 16 6BEEK CLASSICAL LITERATURE. IIdvre<; fiev 0p7)vov apuTTov dvBpl BvarS) • Aexnepov he, koCKov <^vav yeveadab To rplrov Se, irXovreiv aS6\(o6K\eeaSepocro(j>la, or soaring wisdom, which disdains the common concerns of life. The comedy of " The Banqueters," which is spoken of first, does not exist any more, but we have many 72 GREEK CLASSICAL LITERATURE. quotations and fragments from it. It is to be regretted that some of the comedies of Aristophanes are so lewd that we cannot with decency read them. CHAPTEE V, PEOSE — HISTOEY HEEODOTUS. While the Greets were cultivating poetry, the Se- mitic races — Egyptian, Assyrian, Hebrew — had histor- ical records. The reason is that they were constituted generally in large monarchies, and their rulers had an interest in keeping the records of their glorious deeds. Greece had really no history before Herodotus, who has been called the Father of History. Four historians, who came before him, havef mixed history with legend. Many fragments remain from those historians, which have been collected by several German Hellenists, such as Clausen, Sturz, and Creuzer. Fherecydes, of Leros, a small island near Miletus, flourished during the Persian "War, and lived eighty- five years. He gave ten boots of family records of Athens. He wa8«auch consulted by the later mythog- raphers, and his numerous fragments must still serve as the basis of many mythological inquiries. Charon was bom at Lampsacus, a Milesian colony. He wrote a history of the Persian War, but he was a chronicler rather than an historian. Those early histo- rians have been called also Horographers (flpoypd^oi), as it were, giving an account hour by hour. PROSE— HISTORY— HEE0D0TU3. V3 HellanicTis, of ilitylene, in the iilaiid of Lesbos, was almost a contemporary of Herodotus. He wrote nu- merous works in the way of chronicles, but nothing complete remains. According to Thucydides, and sev- eral writers who do not belong to the classical pjeriod, il rt'a pas de critique. Some, however, pretend that he was a learned and diligent compiler, and that, so far as his sources went, he was a trustworthy one. He lived eighty-five years. Xanthus was a native of Sardis (Lydia). This point, however, is a doubtful one, as also the period when he flourished. Xanthus wrote a history of Lydia, of wjjich some considerable fragments have come down to us. nZEODOTTS. Herodotus was bom at Halicarnassus. in 4S4. His family, which was one of the most distinguished in the 1i GREEK CLASSICAL LITERATURE. city, was exposed to the persecution of the tyrant Lyg- damis. Herodotus, at a very early age, had to fly to Samos. There he cultivated the Ionic dialect, and there, too, imbibed the Ionic spirit which pervades his history. He joined in an attempt which was made in order to free Samos from the tyranny of Lygdamis.^' The at- tempt proved successful, but soon after Herodotus again left his country and settled in Magna Grsecia, at Thurii. It is there, very likely, that he wrote his work, that he died at a very old age, and was buried, Herodotus presents himself to our consideration in three points of view — as a traveller, an observer, and an historian. The extent of his travels may be ascertained pretty clearly from his history ; but the order in which he visited each place, and the time of visiting, cannot be determined. His travels, however, must have occu- pied a considerable period of his life, and he would seem to have first entered upon them in the full strength of body and mind, and after having been completely educated. The history of his reading his work at the Olympic games, which has found its way into most modem nar- ratives, has been ably discussed, and, it may be said, has been disproved. With a simplicity which characterizes his whole work, Herodotus makes no display of the great extent of his travels ; and he is so free from the ordinary vanity of travellers, that, instead of acting a prominent part in his narrative, he very seldom appears at all in it. Hence, it is impossible to give any thing like an accu- rate chronological succession of his travels. In Greece proper, or on the coasts of Asia Minor, there is scarcely PROSE— HISTORY— HERODOTUa 15 any place of importance with which he is not perfectly ■familiar from his own observation, and where he did not make inquiries respecting this or that particnlar point ; we may mention more especially the oracular places, such as Dodona and Delphi. He also visited most of the Greek islands. As for his travels in foreign countries, we know that he sailed through the Hellespont, the Fropontis, and crossed the Euxine in both directions. With the Palus Maeotis he was imperfectly acquainted. He far- ther visited Thrace and Scythia. The interior of Asia Minor was well known to him, especially Lydia, and so was also Phoenicia. He visited Tyre for the special purpose of obtaining information respecting the worship of Hercules. Previous to this he had been in I^ypt, for it was in Egypt that his curiosity respecting Her- cules had been excited. A second source from which Herodotus drew his information was the literature of his country, especially the poetical portion, for prose had not yet been culti- vated very extensively, as we have just had occasion to observe. With the poems of Homer and Hesiod he was perfectly familiar, though he attributed less his- torical importance to them than might have been ex- pected. He was also acquainted with the poetry of Alcaens, Sappho, Simonides, Pindar, and ^schylus. The object of the work of Herodotus is to give an account of the struggles between the Greeks and Per- sians, from which the former, with the help of the lonians, came off victorious. He traces the enmity between Europe and Asia to the mythical times. But he rapidly passes over the mythical ages to come to ^6 GREEK CLASSICAL LITERAT0KE. Croesus, King of Lydia, who was known to have com- mitted acts of hostility against the Greeks ; this in- duces him to give a full history of Croesus and the kingdom of Lydia. The conquest of Lydia by the' Persians, under Cyrus, then leads him to relate the rise of the Persian monarchy, and the subjugation of Asia Minor and Babylon. The history of Cambyses, and his expedition into Egypt, induce him to enter into the details of Egyptian history. The expedition of Darius against the Scythians, causes him to speak of Scythia and the north of Europe. The kingdom of Persia now extended from Scythia to Cyrene, and, an army being called in by the Cyreneans against the Persians, Herodotus proceeds to give an account of Cyrene and Libya. In the mean time the revolt of the lonians broke out, which eventually brings the contest between Persia and Greece to an end. An account of this insurrection, and of the rise of Athens after the expulsion of the Pisistratidse, is followed by what prop- erly constitutes the principal part of the work, and the history of the Persian "War now runs on in a regular channel until the taking of Sestos. The great structure of the history thus bears a strong resemblance to a grand epic poem. The work, how- ever, has an abrupt termination, and is probably in- complete. The division of the history into nine books, each bearing the name of a muse, was made by some grammarian, for there is no indication in the whole com- position of the divisions having been made by the author himself. The entire work is pervaded by a profoundly religious idea, which distinguishes Herodotus from all other Greek historians. Li order to form a fair judg- PEOSE—HISTOEY— HERODOTUS. 77 ment of the historical value of the work of Herodotus, we must distinguish those parts in which he speaks from his own observation, or gives the results of his own investigations, from those in which he merely re- peats what he was told by priests, interpreters, guides, and the like. In the latter case, he was undoubtedly often deceived ; but he never intrudes such reports as any thing more than they really are, and, under the in- fluence of his natural good sense, he frequently cautions his reader by some such remarks as — "I know this only from hearsay ; " or, " I have been told so, but do not believe it." But, whenever he speaks from his own observation, Herodotus is a real model of truth- fulness and accuracy, and the more those countries of which he speaks have been explored by modern travellers, the more firmly has his authority been es- tablished. The dialect in which Herodotus wrote is the Ionic, intermixed with epic or poetical expressions, and some- times even with Attic and Doric forms. This pecu- liarity of his language called forth a number of lexi- cographical words of learned grammarians, all of which are lost, with the exception of a few remnants in the Homeric glosses. The excellences of his style do not consist in any artistic or melodious structiu-e of his sen- tences, but in the antique and epic coloring, the trans- parent clearness, the lively flow of his narrative, and his natural and unaffected gracefulness. There is, per- haps, no work in the whole range of ancient literature which so closely resembles a familiar and homely oral narration as that of Herodotus. Its reader cannot help feeling as though he were listening to an old man, who. V8 GEEEK CLASSICAL LITEEATTTBE. from the inexhaustible stores of his knowledge and ex- perience, tells his stories with that single-hearted sim- plicity and naivete, which are the marks and indica- tions of a truthful spirit. OHAPTEE VI. HISTOET THUCTDIDES XENOPHON CTESIAS. Thucydides is the inventor of philosophical history. He was bom at Halimus, near Athens, in 471, and was the son of Olonus and Hegesipyle. Lucian says that Thucydides was present when, at the Olympian games, Herodotus read his history before the assembled Greeks, and that he shed tears ; but this is a fable, very likely, as well as the incident of Herodotus reading his history under such circumstances. It is said that Thucydides was instructed in oratory by Antiphon, and in philos- ophy by Anaxagoras. "We have no trustworthy evi- dence of Thucydides having distinguished himself as an orator, though from his speeches we may conclude that he possessed an oratorical talent. He was, how- ever, employed in a military capacity, and was in com- mand of the Athenian fleet at Thasos, in 424, when he was sent to Amphipolis in order to protect that city against Brasidas, a Spartan general. He arrived too late, and was on that account exiled. It is not known where he went to, but evidently he did not go to any place which was under Athenian dominion. It is very likely that, during the time of his exile, he collected HISTORY— THUCTDIDES—XENOPHON—CTESIAS. ■79 materials and wrote his work. The exile of Thucydides lasted twenty years. He may have returned to Athens, in 403, and, according to some very reliable accounts, he was assassinated. With Thucydides history is solid instruction ; its incidents convey lessons for statesmen, as well as for individuals in any state of life. The example of Thu- cydides has been followed in modern times, but it is a TIITJCTl>rDES. question whether there has been any who has surpassed him, for thonghtfulness and suggestiveness. Thucyd- ides wrote " The Peloponnesian War ; " he gave only twenty-one years of that war. It has been thought that the eighth book was not from him, because there is no speech in it. This reason is a weak one ; the slight difference which exists between that book and the other ones, allows us only to conclude that Thueyd- 80 OKEEE CLASSICAL LITERATURE. ides had no time to revise it. For that book cannot be the work of the continnators of Thucydides; neither is it by Xenophonj who took other divisions in his nar- ration ; nor by Theopompus, whose style is quite dif- ferent from that of Thucydides. This writer opens his work with a beautiful sketch of Greek history. The war was a war of races — a contest between the Dorian and the Ionian races. Thucydides, though an Ionian, is impartial. It was also a contest between aristocratic Athens and demagogic Sparta. Thucydides was a par- tisan of aristocracy. He knew by experience whither the mob could lead a government. The authority of Thucydides was, of course, very great. The speeches form the most prominent part of the work. Cicero crit- icises them for their diflSculty and obscurity, but Aris- totle praises them, saying, with reason, that Thucyd- ides did not write his book in order to satisfy the curi- osity of the present age, but for the instruction of pos- terity ; besides, there was as yet no treatise on the art of speaking (oratory). The speeches were character- istic: laconic on the side of the fcjpartans, poetic on the side of the Athenians. Throughout the whole work there is a strict love of truth ; descriptions are avoided. The qualities in which Thucydides has sel- dom been equalled are moral wisdom and political sagacity. The episode of the Corcyrian War, in which he points out the causes of the sedition, is very good. Thucydides confined himself strictly to his subject. In recapitulation these two historians are \eiy good. Xenophon, the son of Gryllus, was born at Athens, in 444. He was a soldier in his youth, and saved by Socrates at the battle of Delium (424). At the insti- HISTOEY— THUCYDID^— XENOPHON— CTESIAS. 81 gation of Proxenns, lie joined the expedition of Gyms the Younger against Artaxerxea Mnemon. After the defeat of Cyrus in the plain of Canaxa, he retreated, with ten thotisand Greeks, and, after fifteen months, they arrived at Trapezus (Trehizond), being eight thou- sand five hundred in number. Xenophon could never return to Athens; a decree had been issued against him, and he was banished for two reasons — ^he was a friend of Socrates, and a friend of Sparta. Agesilaus was with Xenophon during the Asiatic expedition ; he was recalled to Greece, and Xenophon accompanied him to Sparta, and accepted from that Mng a country- seat, near Scyllus, where he spent a long time, hunt- ing, entertaining his friends, writing some of his works — in one word, living Kke a gentleman. It is not knoflm how, when, or where he died. The extant works of Xenophon may be divided into four classes : 1. Historical, comprising " The Anabasis," "The HeUenica," "The Cyropaedia," and "The Life of Agesilaus ; " 2. Didactic, comprising " The Hip- parchicus," the " Treatise on Horsemanship," and that on " Hunting ; " 3. Political, comprising the works on the republics of Sparta and Athens, and " The Reve- nues of Athens ; " 4. Philosophical, comprising " The Memorabilia of Socrates," " The (Economicus," " The Symposium, or Banquet," " The Hiero," and " The Apology of Socrates." There are also extant certain letters attributed to Xenophon, but, like many other ancient productions of the same class, they are not genuine. 1. HJSTOHicAL "WoEKS. — " The Anabasis " QAvd^or o-ts), in seven books, is the work by which Xenophon 82 GREEK CLASSICAL LITEEATDRE. is best known. The first book gives the inarch of Cyrus to the neighborhood of Babylon, and ends with his death. The last six books contain the account of the retreat of the ten thousand. The work is written in an easy, agreeable style, and gives a great deal of curious information respecting the country traversed by the Greeks, and the manners of the people. It is full of interest also as being a minute detail by an eye- witness of the hazards and adventures of the army in their difficult march through an unknown and hostile country. " The Hellenica " (EXKtjviko) is a Greek history, divided into seven books, and comprising the space of forty-eight years, from the time when the history of Thucydides ends to the battle of Mantinea (862). This book has little merit as a history, for Xenophon does not give the philosophy of the events which he relates like Thucydides. It is in general a dry narration, and contains little to move or affect, with the exception of a few incidents better narrated. " The Cyropsedia " (Kvpov TraiSeCa), in eight books, is a kind of political romance, in which the ethical element prevails ; but, since it is based upon the his- tory of Cyrus the Elder, it is commonly ranked among the historical works of Xenophon. Its object is to show how citizens can be formed to be virtuous and brave, and to exhibit also a model of a wise and good governor. It is an agreeable exposition of principles under the form of a history. The dying speech of Cyrus is worthy of a pupil of Socrates. " The Agesilaus " (^Aynv. — PiNDAB, Fragment). "Jam te premet moXjfabnlseqne Manes." —Odet i., 4, 16. KarOavoiffa Be KeK, oiSeTrore fiva/juxrvva credev eaa-er ovSiiroT et? Harepov, ov yhp weSjj^ets ^poBpmv T&v eic Ilieplcwi. A)OC d6ev ' d/i/ie^ S* dv to pAaaov vdi. ^prjfieOa trvv fieKaivn, ■XeifiStvb iur)(6evvT€iKy €tKvfiipova<;. — Hesiod, 'Epy., 66. 'AdavdroK efuy(dev. — PiNDAH, IstJim., 2, 42. AaXbv vSap. KaTai^dTT}a)voldio ad mortem irrevocabili constantia de- cucurrit: usque ad supreraum diem beatus et felix, nisi quod rainorem ex liberis duobus amisit; sed majorem melioremque, florentem atque etiam consularem reliquit. La?serat famam suam sub Nerone ; credebatur sponte accusasse. Sed in ViteDii ami- citia sapienter se et comiter gesserat; ox proconsulatu Asiaa gloriam reportaverat : maculara veteris industriaj laudabili otio 210 ROMAN CLASSICAL LITERA.TUBB. abluerat. Fuit inter prinoipes oivitatis sine potentia, sine invidia. Salutabatur, oolebatnr, multumque in lectnlo jaoens, cubiculo sem- per non ex fortuna frecjuenti. Dootissimis sermonibus dies trans- igebat, quum a scribendo vaoaret. Soribebat carmina majore oura quam ingenio : nonnunquam judicia hominum reoitationibus experiebatur. Novissime, ita suadentibns annis, ab urbe seoessit, seque in Campania tenuit ; ac ne adventu qtddem novi prinoipis inde commotus est. Magna Csesaris laus, sub quo hoc liberum fuit ; magna Ulius qui hac libertate ausus est uti. Erat fMrnTioc* usque ad emacitatis reprehension em. Plures iisdem in loois villas possidebat, adamatisque novis, priores negligebat. Multum ubique librorum, multum statuarum, multum imaginum, quas non habe- bat modo, verum etiam venerabatur ; Virgilii ante omnes, cujus natalem religioslus quam suum celebrabat, Neapoli maxime, ubi monumentum ejus adire, ut templum, solebat. In hac tranquiHi- tate annum quintum et septnagesimnm exoessit, delicato magis corpore quam infirmo. TJtque novissimus a Kerone factus est consul, ita postremus ex omnibus quos Nero consules fecerat, de- cessit. Illud etiam notabile ; ultimus ex Neronianis consularibus obiit, quo consule Kero periit. Quod me recordantem, fragilitatis humansB miseratio subit. Quid enim tarn circumcisum, tarn breve, quam hominis vita longissima ? An non videtur tibi Nero modo fuisse, quum interim ex iis qui sub illo gesserant oonsulatum, nemo jam superest? Quanquam quid hoc miror? Nuper Lucius Piso, pater Pisonis illius qui a Valerio Festo per summum facinus in Africa occisus est, dicere solebat, Neminem se videre in senatu, quern, consul ipse sententiam rogavisset. Tarn angustis terminis tantffl multitudinis vivacitas ipsa concluditur, ut mihi non venia solum dign£e, verum etiam laude videantur illse regise lacrymse. Nam ferunt Xerxem, quum immensum exercitum ocnlis obiisset, illacrymasse, quod tot millibus tam brevis immineret occasus. Sed tanto magis hoc, qnidquid est temporis futilis et caduoi, si non datur factis (nam horum materia in aliena manu), nos certe studiis proferamus ; et, quatenns nobis denegatur diu vivere, re- linquamua aliquid, quo nos vixisse testemur. Scio te stimulis non egere ; me tamen tui charitas evocat, ut currentem quoque in- * Serum pulohrarum cupidus. PROSE— PHILOSOPHERS AND GRAMMARIANS. 211 stigem, sicut tu soles me. 'XyaS^ d" epig * quum invicem se mu- tuis exhortationibus amici ad amorem immortalitatis eyacuunt. Vale." The tenth book is the most important, containing the letters of Pliny to Trajan, and several answers of that prince. Pliny died in 110, at the age of forty- nine years. M. Fabius QaintUianTis was born in Spain in 42, and died at Home in 118. He went there early, and was twenty years a teacher of grammar and rhetoric. He had Pliny the Younger as a pupil, and also two grand- nephews of the Emperor Domitian. Quintilian was paid by the state ; he was in good circumstances, al- though he could not at that time be called a rich man. He married twice. His countryman Martial, speaking of him as the glory of the Eoman bar, and the head of his profession as an instructor, says : " Quintiliane, vagse moderator summe juventse, Gloria Bomanae, Quintiliane, togos." Quintilian's great work is entitled " Institutiones Oratorise," in twelve books. It is a complete treatise on the rhetorical art, which embraces a plan of study for the orator from the first elements of grammar. Quintilian here states the results of long experience and deep reflection. He gives signal proofs in it of an excellent judgment, of a refined, critical spirit, of a pure taste, and of extensive and varied reading. This work is preferable to all that we have from Cicero respect- * Bona autem oonoertatio, hseo mortalibus. — ^Hesiodus. 212 ROMAN CLASSICAL LITEBATUKE. ing the theory of eloquence. Quintilian has formed his style upon that of Cicero, and he writes with an elegance which would entitle him to rank by the side of the present models of the Augustan age, if certain obscure expressions, and some specimens of affected phraseology, did not betray a later writer. His tenth book contains a very precious " History of Ancient Lit- erature." The declamations ascribed to him do not, certainly, belong to Quintilian. The disposition of Quintilian was as affectionate and tender as his genius was brilliant and his taste pure. Few passages, throughout the whole range of Latin literature, can be compared to that in which he mourns the loss^of his wife and children. We may judge by the following translation : " I had a son," says he, " whose eminent genius deserved a father's anxious diligence. I thought that if — which I might fairly have expected and wished for — if death had removed me from him, I could have left him, as the best inheritance, a father's instructions. But by a second blow, a second bereavement, I have lost the object of my highest hopes, the only comfort of my declining years. What shall I do now? Of what use can I suppose myself to be, as the gods have cast me off? It happened that when I commenced my book on the causes of corrupt eloquence, I was stricken by a similar blow. It would have been best then to have flung myself upon the funeral-pile — which was destined, prematurely to consume all that bound me to life — my unlucky work, and the ill-starred fruits of all my toils, and not to have wearied with new cares a life to which I so unnaturally clung. For what ten- PROSE— PHILOSOPHERS AND GRAMMARIANS. 213 der parent would pardon me if I were able to study any longer, and not hate my firmness of mind, if I, who survived all my dear ones, could find any employ- ment for my tongiie, except to accuse the gods, and to protest that no Providence looks down upon the affairs of men ? " Their mother had before been torn from me, who had given birth to two sons before she had completed her nineteenth year ; and, though her death was a cruel blow to me, to her it was a happy one. To me the affliction was so crushing that Fortune could no longer restore me to happiness. For not only did the exercise of every feminine virtue render her husband's grief in- curable, but, compared with my own age, she was but a girl, and therefore her loss may be accounted as that of a child. Still my children survived, and were my joy and comfort, and she, since I survived, escaped by a precipitate flight the agonies of grief. In my younger son, who died at five years old, I lost one light of my eyes. I have no ambition to make much of my mis- fortunes, or to exaggerate the reasons which I have for sorrow ; would that I had means of assuaging it ! But how can I conceal his lovely countenance, his endear- ing talk, hia sparkling wit, and (what I feel can scarcely be believed) his calm and deep solidity of mind ? Had he been another's child, he would have won my love. But insidious Fortune, in order to inflict on me severer anguish, made him more affectionate to me than to his nurses, his grandmother, who brought him up, and all who generally gain the attachment of children of that age. " Thankful, therefore, do I feel for that sorrow in 214 ROMAN CLASSICAL LITERATURE. which but a few months before I was plunged by the loss of his matchless, his inestimable mother; one only hope, support, and consolation, had remained in my Quintilian. He had not, like my younger son, just put forth his early blossoms, but, entering on his tenth year, had shown mature and well-set fruit. In him 1 dis- cerned such vigor of intellect, such a zeal for study, which never required pressing, but also such upright- ness, filial affection, refinement, and generosity, as fur- nished grounds for apprehending the thunder-stroke which has fallen. He possessed also those gifts which are accidental: — a clear and melodious voice, a sweet pronunciation, a correct enunciation of every letter both in Greek and Latin; he possessed also the far higher qualities of constancy, earnestness, and firmness to bear sorrow and to resist fear. O dearest object of my disappointed hopes! could I behold thy glazing eyes, thy fleeting, when life began to fail! could I embrace thy cold and lifeless form, and live to drink again the common air ! "Well do I deserve these ago- nizing thoughts, these tortures which I endure ! " It is the touching eloquence of one who could not write otherwise than gracefully. AureliuB Cornelias Celsus, a physician, who lived probably under the reign of Tiberius, The only work extant from him is a treatise, in eight books, on medi- cine, written in a beautiful Augustan style, and show- ing the learning of Celsus as a physician. The best evidence of the merit of the book of this writer is tha,t, in our days, it is yet a text-book found in the hands of many pupils of medicine. He has been called the Cicero Medicorum. PROSE— PHILOSOPHERS AND GRAMMARUNS. 215 Another physician, ScElBONnis Laegus Designati- ANUS, was the author of several works, one of which, a large collection of prescriptions, is extant. Fomponius Mela wrote, under the reign of Claudius, a geographical book, " De Situ Orbis Libri III." The book is systematic and learned. The simplicity of the style, and almost Augustan purity of the Latinity, pre- vent so bare a skeleton and list of facts from being dry and uninteresting. L. Junius Moderatus Columella wrote a didactic work, " De Ke Eustica," in twelve books, the tenth of which is written in verse; it is rather metrical prose than poetry, but the versification is correct, and the whole work, which is well composed, shows great fluency. Nothing is known of his life. Sextus Julius Frontinus deserves a place among the Roman classical writers for his two books now extant. The first is on military tactics, and entitled " Strate- gematica Libri TV." It is a good composition, and a very valuable work to the antiquarian, although of no practical utility to the tactician. Tjjk,e other work, which we have complete, is a descriptive architectural treatise, in two books. Besides those two works, we have fragments of other writings, one of which is on surveying — " Agri Mensores," or " Eei Agrarise Scrip- tores." They were scientific and jurisprudential at the same time. Frontinus occupied several offices in the city, un- der the Emperor Vespasian. He was even sent to succeed Cerialis, as governor of Britain, by this same emperor. He died in. the year 106. With Frontinus ends the list of the classical writers 216 ROMAN CLASSICAL LITERATURE. in the Latin language. After him we have many au- thctrs, but few of them could imitate the literature of the Augustan age. The brightest stars which illumi- nated the darkness were Aulus Gellius, Appuleius, Pe- tronius, Lactantius, and the first Christian writers. APPENDIX. Although in the body of our work we have given the names of the principal writers who belong to the period of Oreeh clas- sical literature, still we have deemed it well to insert, by way of appendix, a short notice of a few authors of a much later era, but whose works nevertheless are, on account of their intrinsic merit, justly numbered among the classics, and, as such, read in many schools and colleges. As the first of this number we may mention Theocritus, the most celebrate'd of bucolic poets, who flourished at Syracuse, in Sicily, B. 0. 27-0. In his youth he received instructions under able masters. Subsequently he became a friend of Aratus, a Greek poet of Cihoia, and lived part of his time at Alexandria, and the rest at Syracuse. The circumstances of his death are not pre- cisely known, but it has been supposed, without sufficient rea- son, however, that he was strangled by order of Hiero, King of Sicily, in revenge for some pieces of a satirical nature which the poet had written against him. Theocritus is distinguished chiefly for his bucolic poems, all of which were written in the Dorian dialect. Fifty-one poems are attributed to him, thirty of which — be- longing to the bucoUc order — are entitled " Idyls," and the re- mainder "Epigrams." Theocritus has had many imitators, both among the ancients and moderns, but in grace and naUmeti of dic- tion he stands yet unrivalled. He is sometimes indeUcate in his expressions, but otherwise his works are faithful copies of nature, 10 218 ROMAN CLASSICAL LITEKATUKE. characterized by a picturesque description of scenery, and a rich- ness and delicacy of fancy rarely to be met with in any other author. Lucian, a distinguished writer, born at Samosata, in Syria, lived several centuries later than Theocritus, but is notwithstand- ing justly entitled to a prominent place among the classic authors of Greek literature. The age in which he flourished is not known, but it is generally believed that he lived about the time of Trajan, although many are of opinion that he was of a much later date. He was at first an advocate at Antioch, but, having relinquished this profession, he devoted himself to literary pursuits, in which he soon attained great celebrity. He had a particular love for travel, and at an early age visited Greece, Asia, and Gaul, and in this last-mentioned country he remained in the capacity of teacher of rhetoric, until he was about forty years of age. After leaving Gaul he visited Italy, and many other countries, particularly the provinces of Greece and Asia Minor, He lived, however, a greater part of his time in Athens, where he died, at a very advanced age. He wrote numerous works on various subjects, the greater part of which were in the form of dialogue. They were nearly all of a satirical nature, and were directed against the prevailing vices and follies of the day. That Lucian was endowed with the true spirit of satire, and a fund of humor rarely possessed by any other writer, is fully evinced by his works; and, were we to judge from his style, which was formed upon that of the beat models of Greek genius, we would be led to believe that he flourished in the classic era of Greek literature. Plutarch, a native of Cheronea, in Boeotia, was born about the middle of the first century ; the exact period of his birth is unknown. He commenced his studies when quite young, and, as he enjoyed the instructions of excellent teachers, he made rapid progress in the various departments of belles-lettres and mathematics. At a very early age he was employed by his fel- low-citizens in negotiations with the neighboring cities, and this was subsequently the motive of his visiting Bome, where, when his public business did not interfere, he gave lecthres in philos- ophy and eloquence. He did not, however, remain at Bome for APPENDIX. 219 any length of time, but returned to Ms native land, where he was incessantly engaged in the services of his countrymen. The works of Plutarch are very voluminous, hut the one for which he is most celebrated is " The ParaUel Lives." This contains short biograph- ical notices of forty-four individuals — the most iDustrious of the ancient Greeks and Romans — in such a manner that a Greek is always compared with a Roman. Besides these he wrote five isolated biographies, and twelve or fourteen others which are lost. These works are no less interesting than instructive, and for the historian they are invaluable, as they contain many facta which cannot bo found in any other history. He is, however, in PLUTAEOn. these works chargeable with one great defect, viz., an entire neg- lect of all chronological order — a fault which occasions in the mind of the reader only a confused impression of what he has gone over. Besides these, Plutarch was the author of several other works, some of which were of an historical and others of a philosophical nature ; but, as they are comparatively only of minor importance, we shall pass them by without further com- ment. St. John Chrysostom.— " The Homily " which St. John pro- nounced in favor of Eutropius is translated in many colleges, and may surely be considered as a masterpiece of eloquence. How- 220 SOMAN CLASSICAL LITERATUEB. ever, some passages show bad taste, wMoh we always find in the works of Greek writers who do not belong to the classical period of literature. Many names might be added, but we had to confine ourselves, as we have said, within the limits of what may be strictly called classical literature. THE END. D. APPLETON & go: 8 PUBLICATIONS. Germania and Agricola of Caius Cornelius Tacitus : With Notes for Colleges. By W. S. TYLER, Professor of the Greek and Latin Languages in Amherst College. 12mo, 193 pages. Tacitii8'8 account of Germany and life of Agricola are among the most fascinating and instructive Latin classics. The present edition has been prepared expressly for college classes, by one who knows what they need. In it will be found: 1. A Latin text, approved by all the more recent editors. 2. A copious illustration of the gram- matical constructions, as well as of the rhetorical and poetical usages peculiar to Taci- tus. In a writer so concise it has been deemed necessary to pay particular regard to the connection of thought, and to the particles as the hinges of that connection. 8. Constant comparisons of the writer with the authors of the Augustan age, for the pur- pose of indicating the changes which had aheady been wrought in the language of the Boman people. 4. An embodiment in small compass of the most valuable labors of such recent German critics as Grimm, Gilnther, Gruber, Kiessling, Dronke, Both, Buperti, and Walther. From Pnop. LnrooLH, of Brown VmlnereUiy. "I have found the book in daily use with my class of very great service, very practi- cal, and well suited to the wants of students. I am very much pleased with the Life of Tacitus and the Introduction, and Indeed with the literary character of the book throughout. We shall make the book a part of our Latin course." The History of Tacitus : By W. S. TYLER. With Notes for Colleges. 12mo, 453 pages. The text of Tacitus is here presented in a form as correct as a comparison of the best editions can make it Notes are appended for the student's use, which contain not only the grammatical, but likewise all the geographical, archseological, and historical illustra- tions that are necessioy to render the author intelligible. It has been the constant aim of the editor to carry students beyond the dry details of grammar and lexicography, and introduce them to a femiliar acquaintance and lively sympathy with the author and his times. Indexes to the notes, and to the names of persons and places, render refer' «nce easy. JB¥ eree. Quintus Curtius : Life and Exploits of Alexander the Great. Edited and illustrated with English Notes. By WILLIAM HENRY CROSBY. 12mo, S85 pages. Curtius'a History of Alexander the Great, fhongi little nsed in the schools of this eountry, in England and on the Continent holds a high place in the estimation of classi- cal instnictora. The interesttog character of its snbjeot, the elegance of its style, and the purity of its moral sentiments, ought to place it at least on a par with OsBsar's Commen- taries or SaDust's Histories. The present edition, by the late Professor of Latin in But- gers CoDegc, is unexceptionable in typography, convenient in form, scholarly and prac- tical in its notes, and altogether an admirable textbook for classes preparing for crf- lega. Prmn PEpr. Owen, i^fOie Mw Tarh Free Aammny. "It gives me great pleasure to add my testimonial to the many you are receiving in fevor of the beauttfU and well-edited edition of Quintus Curtius, by Prof Wm. Henry Crosljy. It is seldom that a classical book is sntmttted to me for examination, to which I can give so hearty a recommendation as to this. The external appearance is attractive ; the paper, type, and btading, being just what a text-book should be, neat, clear and du- rable. The notes are briei; pertinent, scholar-like, neither too exubermt nor too meagre, but happily exemplUJing the golden mean ao desirable and yet so very dlfflcnlt of at- tainment.*' D. APPLETON