-^ I'l* iiiniTiri Mriimr- The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029199565 Cornell University Library BJ1481 .E42 olin 3 1924 029 199 565 Booklets in \ew k Fancy Bindings. BLESSING OF CHEERFULNESS (THE). By the Rev. J. R. Miller, D.D. CHILDREN'S WING (THE). By Elizabeth Glover. CONFLICTING DUTIES. By E. S. Elliott. CULTURE AND REFORM. By Anna Robertson Brown. DO WE BELIEVE IT ? By E. S. Elliott. EXPECTATION CORNER. By E. S. Elliott. FAMILY MANNERS. By author of "Talks about a Fine GIRLS: 'faults AND IDEALS. By the Rev. J. R. Miller, D.D. HAPPY LIFE (THE). By Charles W. Eliot, L.L.D. JESSICA'S FIRST PRAYER. By Hesba Stretton. KING OF THE GOLDEN RIVER (THE). By John Ruskin. LADDIE. By the author of " Miss Toosey's Mission." LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP. By Ralph Waldo Emerson. MASTER AND MAN. By Count Lyof N. Tolstoi. MISS TOOSEY'S MISSION. By the author of "Laddie." PATHS OF DUTY (THE): Counsels to Young Men. By Dean Farrar. REAL HAPPENINGS. By Mrs. Mary B. Claflin. SECRETS OF HAPPY HOME LIFE. By the Rev. J. R. Miller, D.D. STILLNESS AND SERVICE. By E. S. Elliott. SWEETNESS AND LIGHT. By Matthew Arnold. TALKS ABOUT A FINE ART. By Elizabeth Glover. TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. Bv E. S. Elliott TWO PILGRIMS (THE). By Count Lyof N. Tolstoi. VICTORY OF OUR FAITH (THE). By Anna Robert- son Brown, Ph.D. WHAT IS WORTH WHILE. By Anna Robertson Brown, Ph.D. WHAT MEN LIVE BY. By Count Lyof N. Tolstoi. WHEN THE KING COMES TO HIS OWN. By E. S. Elliott. WHERE LOVE IS, THERE GOD IS ALSO. By Count Lyof N. Tolstoi. YOUNG MEN : FAULTS AND IDEALS. By the Rev. J. R. MUler, D.D. For sale by alt booksellers, or sent, postpaid, by the publishers, on receipt of 35c. Thomas Y, Crowell & Co,, NewYork & Boston, THE HAPPY LIFE BY CHARLES W. ELIOT, LL.D., President of Harvard University NEW YORK: 46 East Fourteenth Street THOMAS Y. CROWELL & CO. BOSTON; loo Purchase Street Copyright 1896, By Thomas Y. Crowell & Co. THE HAPPY LIFE By CHARLES W. ELIOT, LL. D. Mt subject is " The Happy Life." I address here ' especially young people who have passed the period of childhood, with its unreflecting gayety, fleeting shad- ows, gusty griefs, and brief despairs, and have entered, under conditions of singular privilege, upon rational and responsible living. For you happiness must be conscious, considerate, and consistent with habits of observing, reading and reflecting. Now reflecting has always been a grave business, " Where but to think is to be full of sorrow And leaden-eyed despairs " ; and it must be confessed that our times present some new obstacles to a life of thoughtful happiness. Until this century the masses of mankind were almost dumb ; but now their moans and complaints have become audi- ble through telephone, telegraph and rotary press. The millions are now saying what the moody poets have always said : s b TSE HAPPY LIFE. " The flower that smiles to-day To-morrow dies, All that we wish to stay- Tempts and then flies. What is this world's delight ? Lightning that mocks the night, Brief even as bright." The gloomy moralist is still repeating : " I have seen all the works that are done under the sun, and behold ! all is vanity and vexation of spirit." The manual laborers of to-day, who are much better off than the same classes of laborers have been in any eaiiier times, are saying just what Shelley said to the men of England in 1819 : " The seed ye sow another reaps, The wealth ye find another keeps, The robes ye weave another wears. The arms ye forge another bears." They would adopt without change the words in which that eminent moralist, Robinson Crusoe, a century ear- lier, described the condition of the laboring classes : "The men of labor spent their strength in daily struggling for bread to maintain the vital strength they labored with; so living in a daily circulation of sorrow, living but to work, and working but to live, as if daily bread were the only end of wearisome life, and a wearisome life the only occasion of daily bread." Matthew Arnold calls his love to come to the window and listen to the "melancholy, long-withdrawing roar" of the sea upon the moonlit beach at Dover ; and these are his dismal words to her : "Ah, love, let us be true To one another ! for the world, which seems To lie before us like a land of dreams. So various, so beautiful, so new. Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light. THE MORAL PURPOSE OF THE UNIVERSE. 7 Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain ; And we are here as on a darkling plain Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight. Where ignorant armies clash by night." The poets are by no means the only offenders ; the novelists and scientists take their turn. The fiction of this century deals much with the lives of the wretched, dissolute, and vicious, and with the most unjust and dis- astrous conditions of modern society. A fresh diificulty in the way of natural happiness is the highly speculative opinion, lately put forward by men of science and promptly popularized, to the effect that external nature offsets every good with an evil, and that the visible uni- verse is unmoral, or indifferent as regards right and wrong, revealing no high purpose or intelligent trend. This is, indeed a melancholy notion ; but that it should find acceptance at this day, and really make people miserable, only illustrates the curious liability of the human intelligence to sudden collapse. The great solid conviction, which science, within the past three centuries, has enabled thinking men and women to settle down on, is that all discovered and systematized knowledge is as nothing compared with the undiscovered, and that a boundless universe of unimagined facts and forces inter- penetrates and encompasses what seems the universe to us. In spite of this impregnable conviction people dis- tress themselves because, forsooth, they cannot discern the moral purpose or complete spiritual intent of this dimly seen, fractional universe which is all we know. Why should they discern it? It is, then, in spite of many old and some new dis- couragements that we are all seeking the happy life. 8 THE HAPPY LIFE. We know that education spreads, knowledge grows, and public liberty develops ; but can we be sui-e that public and private happiness increase ? What the means and sources of happiness are in this actual world, with our present surroundings, and with no reference to joys or sorrows in any other world, is a natural, timely and wholesome inquiry. We may be sure that one principle will hold throughout the whole pursuit of thoughtful happiness — the principle that the best way to secure future happiness is to be as happy as is rightfully pos- sible to-day. To secure any desirable capacity for the future, near or remote, cultivate it to-day. What would be the use of immortality for a person who cannot use well half an hour ? asks Emerson. In trying to enumerate the positive satisfactions which an average man may reasonably expect to enjoy in this world, I, of course, take no account of those too common objects of human pursuit, wealth, power, and fame; first, because they do not as a rule contribute to happiness ; and secondly, because they are unattainable by mankind in general. I invite you to consider only those means of happiness which the humble and obscure mUlions may possess. The rich and famous are too few to affect ap- preciably the sum of human happiness. I begin with satisfactions of sense. Sensuous pleasures, like eating and drinking, are sometimes described as animal, and therefore unworthy. It must be confessed, however, that men are, in this life, animals all through ■ — whatever else they may be — and that they have a right to enjoy without reproach those pleasures of animal existence which maintain health, strength^ and life itself. Familiar ascetic and LOWER AND HIGHEB PLEASURES. » pessimistic dogmas to the contrary notwithstanding, these pleasures, taken naturally and in moderation, are all pure, honorable and wholesome. Moreover, all at- tempts to draw a line between bodily satisfactions on the one hand, and mental or spiritual satisfactions on the other, and to distinguish the first as beastly indul- gences, and the second as the only pleasures worthy of a rational being, have failed and must fail ; for it is manifestly impossible to draw a sharp line of division between pleasures, and to say that these are bodily, and those intellectual or moral. Are the pleasures of sight and hearing bodily or mental? Is delight in harmony, or in color, a pleasure of the sense, or of the imagination ? What sort of a joy is a thing of beauty ? Is it an animal or a spiritual joy ? Is the delight of a mother in fondling her smiling baby a physical or a moral delight? But though we cannot divide pleasures into animal and moral, unworthy and worthy, we can, nevertheless, divide them into lower and higher pleas- ures ; the lower, those which, like eating and drinking, prompt to the maintenance and reproduction of life, and which can be impaired or destroyed by prolonga- tion or repetition ; the higher, those which, like the pleasures of the eye or ear, seem to be ends in them- selves; in the lower there