■' :■ ■; , .■ , CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1 89 1 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE CJ833 .H C 6°4 ne " Un,vers,t * L,b rary "^^J^JSMLZm the eanies olin Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://archive.org/details/cu31924029779851 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES TO THE REIGN OF AUGUSTUS DESCRIBED BY G. F. HILL, M.A. (OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM) WITH FIFTEEN PLATES LONDON CONSTABLE & CO LTD 1909 7/3 $/£ BRADBURY, AGNEW, & CO. LD-, PRIHTERSj LONDON AND TONBRIDGE PREFACE This volume is intended as a companion to Historical Greek Coins, published three years ago. The evidence afforded by Roman coins as to the course of Roman history is of two kinds. The first, and the more valuable, is contemporary evidence ; the historian has to extract from the extant coins such information as they provide concerning the circum- stances in which they were cast or struck. But, owing to the commemorative habit, which was strong in the Roman race, a certain number of coins illustrate the history of a period which was past when they were issued. Such pieces give us evidence less trustworthy than the first kind, although not infrequently there is less opportunity of error in the interpretation of their meaning. But they are incidentally of interest as indicating the state of opinion which prevailed at the time when they were issued. A case in point is the coin, struck in the first century B.C., commemorating the mission of Lepidus to Egypt at the end of the third century. However, in the selection of coins for this volume, preference has naturally been given to pieces of the contemporary kind. The dry, matter-of-fact temperament of the Romans v PEEFACE is naturally reflected in their coinage. The artist is seldom carried away by any flight of artistic imagina- tion from his immediate purpose, which is to provide a convenient medium of exchange ; his, allegories and his symbolism tend to be crude and frigid ; his references to events are, as far as possible, direct and pointed. One cannot imagine a Greek of the fifth or fourth century proclaiming to the world, with the help of an inscription, that his coins were issued u for the purchase of corn." As for artistic conception and execution, traces of good style are here and there faintly perceptible in the earliest coinage, where it was under Greek influence. Towards the end of the Eepublic the workmanship improves, and the coins provide a certain number of striking portraits. But even the best Greek engravers employed during the Augustan age seldom succeed in producing a reverse design that has any merit as a work of art. In Eoman numismatics, therefore, the pursuit of the truth is deprived of some of the attractions which the study of Greek coins presents. But there is no lack of sport, for anyone who is interested in the interpretation of obscure types, or in the reconciliation of confused or corrupt passages in Eoman historians or antiquaries with the evidence of the coins. Until recently the history of the earliest Eoman coinage has been involved in the utmost obscurity. But the distinguished scholar and collector, Dr. E. J. vi PEEFACE Haeberlin of Frankfurt, in the most remarkable con- tribution that has been made in recent years to any branch of numismatics, has thrown a flood of light on the subject, atid shown how much in the coinage that has seemed unintelligible and chaotic is, when properly interpreted, a clear and orderly development, marching side by side with the progress of Borne as a power in Italy and in the ancient world. In the period following the introduction of the denarius, the arrangement of the coinage presents problems of a different kind, soluble rather by minute and patient comparison and classification than by the exercise of the historical imagination. In this field the work that was done by Count J. F. W. de Salis, although almost unknown even to professional numis- matists, is of extraordinary importance. The whole of the vast Roman and Byzantine collection in the British Museum was arranged by him in the light of his unrivalled knowledge and experience. Enormous quantities of coins, singly or in hoards, passed through the hands of this indefatigable collector, and his eye for fabric and style seems to have become almost infallible. The trays of the British Museum collection have long preserved, in their arrangement, almost the only record of his work ; for he seems to have been singularly averse to publication. Of late, however, his services to Byzantine numismatics have been duly acknowledged by Mr. Wroth, in the Preface vii PEEFACE to his Catalogue of the Imperial Byzantine Coins in the British Museum. And his still more important work on the Eepnblican period will be embodied in the forthcoming British. Museum Catalogue of Roman Republican Coins y by Mr. H. A. Grueber. The fact that, by Mr. Grueber' s kindness, I have been able during the preparation of this volume to consult the proof-sheets of his Catalogue, so far as it had advanced, has made my task very much less troublesome than it might have been. But this bald statement by no means expresses the amount of my debt to his unfailing kindness and readiness to place his knowledge at my disposal in difficult questions of arrangement and interpretation. Eeferences to the forthcoming Catalogue are, where possible, inserted after the descriptions of the coins. Mr. George Macdonald also, with characteristic generosity, undertook to read not merely the proofs, but the even less attractive manuscript of the book. Those who know his published work need not be told that his criticisms have been invaluable. I have also, as usual, to thank the authorities of the Berlin and Paris Cabinets, especially Dr. K. Eegling, M. A. Dieudonn^ and M. J. de Foville, for kindly providing casts of certain coins not represented in the British Museum. G. F. HILL. January^ 1909. vni GLOSSARY OF SOME TECHNICAL TERMS USED IN THE TEXT Aes grave : the early heavy circular coinage of bronze of Rome and Italy. See p. 11. Aes rude : the amorphous lumps of bronze used as currency in Italy before the introduction of coinage proper. See pp. 13, 14. Aes sign at um : a term applied to the large quadrilateral "bricks" issued by the Roman mint. See p. 13. As : a bronze coin originally corresponding in weight to the libra or pound ; afterwards reduced. See p. 6 and passim. Attic Standard : see Euboic- Attic. Aureus : a gold coin, usually equivalent to 25 denarii. See Nos. 51, 55, 56, 58, etc. Bigatus : a coin of which the type is a two-horse chariot. See p. (iO. Blank : see Flan. Campanian Standard : a standard derived from the Phoenician, the didrachm weighing 7*76 grammes (later reduced to 6*82 grammes). Canting Type or Symbol : a type or symbol which indicates, by means of a pun, the person or state to which it refers, as the flamen's cap of Flamininus. Cast Coins : see Struck. Coin : a piece of metal (or, exceptionally, some other convenient material) artificially shaped and marked with a sign or type as a guarantee of its quality and weight, and issued by some responsible authority, to serve primarily as a medium of exchange, in terms of which the value of exchangeable commodities can be expressed. Distinguished from a token by having or being supposed to have an intrinsic value more or less nearly approach- ing the value imposed upon it by the issuing authority. Countermark : a small mark impressed on a coin, usually by some person other than the issuing authority, and intended to giye the coin fresh currency. ix GLOSSARY Denarius : a silver coin equivalent originally to 10, later to 16 asses. See pp. 29, 47 and passim. Didrachm : piece of two drachms, q.v. Die : the instrument containing the design which, by being impressed, produces the type on a coin. The coin in striking was placed between the upper and lower dies. The lower die in ancient times was usually let into an anvil, its fellow inserted in the lower end of a bar of metal, the other end of which could be struck with the hammer. Drachm : a division of the stater (q.v.), usually one-half, but in some systems, as the Corinthian, one-third. Usually derived (after Plutarch Lysand. 17) from SpdTT€ " v* ■ ■ : ^c Nos. 7, 8. HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS 9. Obv. Head of Apollo r., hair bound with diadem, on raised disk ; [above, |]. Rev. Similar type 1. ; above, I. Cast bronze as. 346*02 grammes (5340 grains). B.M.C. Italy, p. 51, No. 1. 10. Obv. Head of Janus, beardless, laureate. Rev. Jupiter, with thunderbolt and sceptre, in four-horse chariot r., driven by Victory ; below, in sunk letters on a raised tablet, ROMA. Silver quadrigalus didrachm. 6*52 grammes (100*6 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 133, No. 90. 11. Obv. Similar type to No. 10 ; below, XXX. Rev. Two soldiers taking an oath over the body of a pig, held by a kneeling attendant ; below, ROMA. G-old piece of 30 asses. 4*47 grammes (69 grains). British Museum. 12. Obv. Elephant r. Rev. Sow 1. Cast bronze " brick." 1746*49 grammes (26952 grains). B.M.C Italy, p. 62, No. 1. The Samnites, whose power was broken at the battle of Sentinum in 295 B.C., continued the struggle against Eome until they were forced to conclude peace in 290. The third phase of the early Eoman coinage is probably to be dated approximately from this time. The introduction of the denarius in 269 or 268 gives us the lower limit. The first historical fact which we must bear in c2 19 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS mind is the establishment by Rome of an effectual control over the whole of Central Italy. By 283 the Sabine country had been annexed, colonies like Hatria established on the Adriatic coast, and the Kelts, who threatened from the North, decisively defeated. Secondly, this settlement was followed by a displace- ment of the forces towards the South. The bar- barians of Central Italy began to press hardly on the Greek cities of Magna Graecia. The Eomans, urged to interfere, effectively restored order, estab- lished garrisons in Locri and other cities, and drove the Tarentines, jealous of their position, into war. The success of Eome in the struggle with Tarentum and Pyrrhus left her mistress of practically the whole of Italy. This is a period, then, of transition. Out of a state, powerful indeed, but still not so powerful that other Italian states can only despair of success in a struggle with her, Eome is developing into the undisputed ruler of the peninsula. The coinage likewise passes through a transitory phase : various experiments seem to be made ; the system is complicated, half-hearted, and lacks uniformity ; and it is only after more than twenty years of this unsatisfactory state of things that Eome takes the heroic step of sweeping aside her rivals in the coinage. She issues her own silver, which henceforth— with but few exceptions — is the only silver currency of Italy. 20 PL. VI Nos. 9 — it. HISTORICAL EOMAN COINS The first innovation in the coinage of the Roman mint which attracts our notice in this period is a reduction in the weight of the as. Opinions vary much as to the degree of this reduction. The actual weights of the asses of this "older reduction" vary from 156*65 to 99*60 grammes, with an average of 131-23 grammes. The semisses vary from 89*50 to 57*96 grammes, with an average of 73*16 grammes. 1 If we are to suppose that there was throughout this period a normal weight for the as, and that the old Osco-Latin pound was still in use, we are almost hound to accept the view that the weight was 136*5 grammes, i.e., half the old libra. The new as would then be the equivalent of the scruple of silver. But, when we consider the smaller denominations of this period, from the trims down to the quarter-ww^'a, a curious fact emerges. The normal weights indicate that ? if we assume an as of 136*5 grammes normal, it was divided not duodecimally, as before, but decimally. Thus the normal uncia weighs apparently not 11*37 but 13*64 grammes (actual average 12*85 grammes), le^ ^ of the as of 136*5 grammes. How are we to explain the sudden super/ession of the duodecimal by the decimal system ? It is due to the fact 2 that the bronze coinage was 1 Eegling, ut sup., p. 495. 2 See Haeberlin, MetroL Grundlagen, pp. 104 f . ; also his Systematic, p. 39. 21 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS now regarded as subordinate to the silver ; the semi- libral as was merely the equivalent in bronze of the silver scruple. Now in the Komano-Campanian silver system the unit, or scruple, was divided decimally into ten libellae ; the actual denominations were all issued in bronze, in the shape of pieces of 4, 3, 2 Ubettae, 1 libella and ~ libella. Since the dominant unit, the silver scruple, was divided decimally, it is not sur- prising that the subordinate unit, the bronze as, was divided in the same way. Such being the relation between the two units, the reduction of the as was a matter of course ; it and the other denominations were bound in time to become a sort of token-money, although we do not know that any restriction was placed on the amount of such coin which could be tendered at a time. The reduction of the bronze has been regarded as a sign of state-bank- ruptcy ; but it was nothing of the kind, so long as the bronze was covered by the silver issues of the state. This being so, why should the government have been at pains to fix the weight of the bronze coins ? The reason was that the ordinary Roman, if he was like the ordinary modern, would never really understand the nature of token-money. A reduction in the size of the British penny would be quite enough to produce a popular outcry and shake the public confidence. In order to reassure the public, therefore, it may well be that the Eoman state pretended, from time to time, 22 PL. VII O PL. VIII HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS to regulate the weight of the as, while allowing it gradually to sink. But the evidence of the coins themselves shows that any such action can have been little more than a pretence. We must not leave the question of the first reduction of the as without mentioning Haeberlin's suggestion that it was associated with a public remission of debts. By the reduction of the weight of the as, debtors would be proportionately relieved. Now, about the beginning of our present period (288 — 286) the Plebs, after long and serious disturbances on account of debt, seceded to the Janiculum ; they returned at the instance of the dictator Q. Hortensius. 1 It is quite possible that they returned only on condition of the remission of their debts by some such measure as the halving of the as. If so, the beginning of our period must be fixed in 286 B.C. 2 The reduction in the weight, and therefore in the size, of the bronze coins brought about a technical change. The uncia No. 7, unlike the pieces of aes grave with which we have met so far, is struck, not cast. It is a difficult matter to make dies of a large size strong enough to stand the strain of striking. Thanks to the reduction, it became possible for the Bomans to produce by striking not only the uncia, ^ uncia, and J uncia, but also the sextans or piece of 1 Liv. Epit. Ubri xi. 2 Haeberlin, Sy&termtik, pp. 44 f. 23 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS 2 unciae. The higher denominations continued to be made with moulds, until the further reduction brought these also within the range of the engraver of dies. Two series of aes grave, other than the ordinary Eoman series just considered, were produced in this period. They are known as the heavy Janus-Mercurius and the heavy Apollo series, 1 from the types of the asses in each (see Nos. 8, 9). Coins of the former series are characterized by bad workmanship and rudeness of style, by comparatively low relief, by a weight based on the pound of 327'45 grammes, 2 and by a greyish granular oxide common in the district round Eome ; they also occur in the famous deposit of Vicarello in much greater quantities than the Apollo series (1109 as against 108 pieces). The coins of the Apollo series, on the other hand, are of good style — unusually good for aes grave — and in high relief, conform to a different standard (a pound of 341 grammes), 3 and have the fine smooth green or brown patina characteristic of Campania. The Apollo series is accordingly assigned to the Capuan mint, the Janus-Mercurius series to the Eoman. The head of 1 To be distinguished from the light series -with corresponding types, and symbols (sickle and vine-leaf) on their reverses ; these belong to the previous period. 2 Both Nos. 8 and 9 are above the normal weights, as is often the case with aes grave. Cp. Haeberlin, Metrolog. Qnmdlagen, p. 41. 3 See Haeberlin, Metrolog. Grundlagen, p. 21. 24 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS Janus on these coins is beardless, not bearded as on the prow series. We find the same head on the earliest Capuan silver and gold, with which we shall deal presently. 1 Thus we now see the pound of 327*45 grammes (with the scruple of 1-137 grammes as its ^-§-3- P ar ^) definitely established in Rome. At Capua, the only silver coins issued in this period are the well-known quadrigati (No. 10), struck on the same standard as their predecessors. The types, it is to be observed, are purely Roman. The Capuan mint also issued large quantities of struck bronze of smaller denominations, the libella, its multiples (up to 4) and its half. More remarkable are the gold coins (No. 11) — the first issued under Roman authority — which accom- panied the silver quadrigati. They have a similar obverse, but on the reverse is a representation of two soldiers taking an oath over the body of a sacrificed swine. There are three denominations, the didrachm weighing 6 scruples, a piece weighing 4 scruples, and the drachm of 3 scruples. On the piece of 4 scruples (No. 11) appears a mark of value, XXX, showing it to be equal to 30 asses. These are supposed to be 30 asses of Italic weight, i.e., of 273 grammes each. This may well be so, 1 The lack of a beard on this double head is not sufficient reason for assuming it to represent some deity other than Janus. 25 HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS for, although, the new pound may have now come in at Borne, there would be nothing surprising in the retention of the older pound, as a unit of reckoning at least, in Campania. 1 Of the various "bricks" which are attributed to this period, one (No. 12), is of peculiar interest, for it is impossible to deny that in some way or other it must be associated with the war with Pyrrhua. Legend says that at the battle of Ausculum in 279 B.C. the elephants of Pyrrhus were frightened by the grunting of swine on the Koman side. 2 The five elephants taken later at the battle of Beneventum were led in triumph in 273, and it was probably on this occasion, when elephants were first seen in Rome, that the piece was issued at Capua. 3 Whether the story of the swine is true, or had already been invented by that time, or was even a later growth, inspired by the types of the "brick," who shall say? 1 The extremely difficult problems connected with this early gold coinage have been discussed by Haeberlin (Zeit. f. Num. xxvi., pp. 229 f .). In particular he has rehabilitated the piece of 30 asses, which was generally supposed to be false. — The equation of 4 scruples of gold to 30 asses of bronze of the Italic weight gives a ratio of 1820 : 1 as between gold and bronze, and if silver was to bronze as 120 : 1, of 15i : i as between gold and silver. 30 X 273 = 8190 = approximately 1820 X 1-137 X 4; and 1820 = 120 X 15J. 2 Aelian de nut. anim, I. 38. 3 Haeberlin, Systematik, p. 54. 26 HISTOBICAL EOMAN COINS the inauguration op an imperial coinage. 268 b.c. 13. Obv. Head of Eoma r. in winged helmet, orna mented with griffin's head ; behind, X. Rev. The Dioscuri on horseback, charging r. ; below, on tablet, ROMA. Silver denarius. 4*32 grammes (66*7 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 15, No. 6. 14. Similar to preceding, but V instead of X on obv., and ROMA on rev. Silver quinarius. 2 - 03 grammes (31'3 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 15, No. 10. 15. Similar to No. 13, but MS instead of X, and ROMA. Silver sestertius. 1*07 grammes (16*5 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 16, No. 13. 16. Obv. Head of Janus, laureate; above, I. Rev. Prow r. ; above I ; below, ROMA. Struck bronze as. 43-16 grammes (666 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 29, No. 219. 17. Obv. Bust of Jupiter r. laureate; behind, S. Rev. Prow r. ; below, ROMA ; above, S. Struck bronze semis. 20*41 grammes (315 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 31, No. 232. 18. Obv. Head of Eoma i\, in winged helmet; behind, V. 27 HISTORICAL KOMAN COINS Rev. The Dioscuri charging r. ; below their horses, b ; in exergue, ROMA. Silver quinarius. 2*11 grammes (32*6 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 179, No. 151. 19. Obv. Head of Jupiter r. laureate. Rev. Victory crowning a trophy ; in exergue, ROMA. Silver victoriatm. 3*22 grammes (49*7 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 36, No. 296. "Imperial" is not too grand an epithet for the coinage on the new system inaugurated by Eome in 269-8 B.C. The denarius, at first intended as the standard coin of the Italian possessions, spread with the extension of the Eoman dominions beyond the seas, and eventually dominated the currency of the civilized world for more than five hundred years. Not until the end of the third century after Christ, when it had sunk, it is true, to be a pitiable reflection of the excellent money as which it began, was it finally superseded by a new silver denomination. All through the Middle Ages the name persisted, and its initial still provides the abbreviation for the English "penny." We are fortunate in knowing within a couple of years the date of the great reform. Pliny's reckoning — which is circumstantially stated — gives us 269 b.c. 1 1 N. H. 33. 13 (44) : Argentum signatum anno urbis cccclxxxv, Q. Ogulnio C. Fabio cos., quinque annis ante primum Punicum bellum. 28 HISTOEICAL ROMAN COINS The Epitome of Livy 1 places the change between the foundation of the colonies of Ariminum and Beneventum on the one hand, and the subjection of the Umbrians and Sallentines on the other. The two colonies in question were founded in 268 B.C.; the wars with the Umbrians and Sallentines seem to have gone on during 267 and 266. It may be that the rogation introducing the reform dated from 269, the coinage itself from the next year. It would take some time, when once the law was passed, to organize the Eoman mint for the production of silver. Engravers would have to be fetched from Capua, and new workshops for striking coins installed. Hitherto few but cast coins had been issued from Eome. If the law was passed late in 269, it would be surprising if the coins were issued before 268. 2 The denarius was, as its name implies, the silver equivalentof 10 bronze asses; henceits mark of value, X. Similarly the quinarius (marked V), and the sestertius or semis-tertius (marked IIS), are the equivalents of 5 and 2\ asses respectively. 3 Let us for the moment et placuit denarium pro decern librls aeris valere, quinarium pro quinque, sestertium pro dupondio ac semisse. 1 Epit. lib. xv, : Coloniae deductae ArvmiTuim in Piceno, Beneventum in Samnio. tunc primum populus Romanus argento uti coepit. Umbri et Sallentini victi, etc. 2 A certain amount of confirmation of the date 268 is to be gathered from an independent passage of Pliny relating to the coinage of 217 B.C., which we shall discuss later. 8 The dividing dot between the two units in the sestertius mark has 29 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS assume that when the denarius was introduced the weight of the as was fixed by law. The normal weight of the earliest denarius is 4*55 grammes (4 scruples). At the rate of 120 : 1, it would be equivalent to 546 grammes of bronze, or 10 pieces of 54*6 grammes. The as of the time must therefore have weighed 54-6 grammes, which is £ (the sextans) of the pound of 327*45 grammes. In other words, the as of the original denarius system was of the sextantal standard. There is, however, a certain body of opinion in favour of the view that the as had not fallen quite so low at the time of the introduction of the denarius, and that it belonged not to the sextantal but to the triental standard ; that is to say, that the denarius was the equivalent in value of 10 asses of 109 '15 grammes. Such an equation postulates a ratio between silver and bronze of no less than 240 : l. 1 We should there- fore have to assume that, when the denarius was instituted, silver was forced up in value to twice as much as it had been hardly a generation before. There is nothing incredible in this, since, as we have seen, silver was now the dominant partner in the system, and the bronze coin was little more than a token. Still, so violent a change in the ratio between been combined with them so as to give the sign H S generally used in texts for sestertitis. 1 1091-5 = 239"8 X 4'55. 30 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS the metals would probably have excited apprehension, and it is much more probable that when the denarius was introduced the bronze as had actually fallen to so low a weight that the equation was possible with the old ratio of 120 : 1. The triental system, it has been argued, must have been in force in 268, since as late as 246, when the Eoman colony of Brundusium was founded, the coinage of that place was instituted on the triental standard. Mommsen maintained that, if this Eoman colony issued coins on the triental standard at the time of its foundation, that standard must have then been in use at Eome itself. But it is impossible to insist on such an argument, in view of our scanty knowledge of the relative values of bronze and silver in Calabria at this time. On that relation partly, and not wholly on the relation in force at Eome, would depend the standard adopted for the bronze coinage in the new colony. Or, it may well be that, in order to spread the influence of the denarius, the Eomans gave it a forced value in their colonies, such as they could not afford to give to it at Eome itself. If a denarius was worth 10 triental asses in Brundusium, and only 10 sextantal asses in Eome, denarii would tend to flow towards the colony. A very doubtful support is given to Mommsen's theory by the statement of Pliny 1 that the weight of i N, E r 33. 44. 31 HISTORICAL SOMAN COINS the as was reduced during the first Punic War. Pliny indeed leads one to suppose that the libral weight had been maintained up to then, and that it was suddenly lowered to the sextantal. In view of the weights of the extant coins, this is either nonsense, or to be interpreted as meaning that the reduced weight was not legally recognized until the sextantal stage was reached. Pliny's statement is so far in favour of Mommsen's theory that it implies that the sextantal stage was first legally recognized during the first Punic War. But we have seen what a serious difficulty is caused by supposing that the legal as was more than sextantal when the denarius was introduced. It is quite likely that Pliny may have been anxious to find an honourable excuse for the reduction of the as — unnecessarily, since, as we have seen, the reduction was a natural development and not a symptom of state bankruptcy — and so hit upon the stress of the first Punic War as offering circum- stances sufficiently straitened. The probabilities, however, are all in favour of the sextantal as having been legalized when the denarius was introduced. Up till that time, since the mint at Eome issued no silver, it may not have seemed so necessary to fix the weight of the asj although the number of asses which went to the silver unit was doubtless constant. But when both silver and bronze began to be issued from Eome it would obviously be desirable not merely to define 32 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS the exchange, but also to determine by law the weight of the bronze money. We have seen that in the previous period the as was divided decimally. With the introduction of the denarius system a return was made to the duodecimal division. " From the moment when in the capital the clear principle of a parallel double standard took the place of a fluctuation between a silver standard and the expression thereof in bronze, the denarius was divided into ten asses, the as into twelve unciae. ' ' * That is to say, each metal was now coined on its natural divisional system. The head of Eoma 2 on the new silver coinage is considerably altered from the form in which the early Capuan silver showed it. The helmet is no longer " Phrygian"; it is of the ordinary round shape with visor, provided, however, with wings and with a griffin- headed crest such as decorated the old "Phrygian" helmet. This, with slight modifications, long con- tinues to be the usual head-dress of Eoma, although the Phrygian form is occasionally revived. The Dioscuri are represented charging, as the later Koman tradition conceived their epiphania at the battle of Lake Eegillus in 496 B.C. The older tradition, preserved by Livy, seems to have been merely that 1 Haeberlin, Metrol. Grundlagen, p. 105. 2 Certainly not Minerva. See Haeberlin, Der Boma-Typus, in Corolla Numismatica, pp. 135 — 155. H.R.C. D 33 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS Aulus Postumius vowed a temple to Castor. But before the denarius was introduced Pollux had become the inseparable twin-brother of Castor, in accordance with the Greek conception of the pair, and perhaps also with the legend of their intervention at the battle of the Sagra on the side of the Locrians against the Crotoniates. 1 But apart from all this the significance of the type, from a monetary point of view, lies in the fact that the Dioscuri were the tutelary divinities of the Eoman knights, i.e., of that class of the sovereign people who were especially occupied with commerce, so that their temple was in the heart of the business quarter. 2 The reduction of the as to one-sixth of the original weight, and the corresponding reduction of the smaller denominations, brought them all down to a diameter (the as measuring about an inch and a half) which made it possible to strike them with dies instead of casting them in moulds. In the previous period this had not been possible for denominations larger than the triens. Some of the latest of the cast coins, by their grotesque rudeness, offer a curious contrast to the struck pieces. What was the effect on the coinage of Italy in general of the important changes which we have 1 Justin xx. 3. Bethein Pauly-Wissowa, Reahncychp. V. 1105. The battle took place about 520 B.C. 3 Mominsen-Blacas, ii., p. 29 ; Macdonald, Coin Types, p. 183. 34 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS described ? Capua continued to issue the silver quadrigatty perhaps even as late as the Hannibalian War ; but the issue was limited, and the metal eventually adulterated. Elsewhere in Italy the local silver coinage came to an end, with one or two excep- tions. Of these the most important was the coinage of the Bruttians, which was continued down to the Hannibalian War. It is possible that Tarentum and Neapolis also continued their silver currency in a limited measure. 1 In regard to bronze, the local mints, so far as we know, were little, if at all, restricted. To compensate for the cessation of the independent coinage of silver, the Romans established mints for coinage on the denarius system in various places, such as Hatria, Croton, Luceria. Some of these issues can be identified by mint-marks : thus the quinarius No. 1 8 is attributed to Luceria on the ground of the letter h (for l), which it bears. In other cases the local coinage is distinguished merely by its somewhat ruder workmanship, and cannot be assigned to specific mints. But in addition to the local issues of coins on the denarius system, the Romans established, either about the same time or a little later, 2 a currency which is represented by the victoriatus (No. 19). The reason 1 See A. J. Evans, The " Horsemen " of Tarentum, pp. 165 f. 2 The date generally accepted is 229 B.C., when Corcyra, Apollonia, and Dyrrhachium submitted to Eome , retaining however some considerable measure of autonomy.. Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 93. D 2 35 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS for the name is clear from the type of the reverse. The normal weight of the victoriatus in the first period of its existence was § of the denarius , i.e., 3 scruples or 3-41 grammes. It was, however, regarded not as a denomination subordinate to the denarius, but as a unit by itself ; witness the fact that its half was marked with S, just as was the half as. What is more, from the purely Eoman point of view, it was not looked upon as a regular coin. It is the only piece not marked with its value. It follows that, though it had of course a commercial value, it was not legal tender. " A man who was owed 300 denarii could be forced to take 600 quinarii or 1200 sesterces, but ndX"^ 400 victoriati." 1 It was, as Pliny says, treated mercis loco. 2 Why was this ? The fact is that the victoriatus took the place of the Campanian drachm, the half of the quadrigatus didrachm, the drachm having ceased to be issued before its double, which, as we have said, lingered on until nearly the end of the century. The victoriatus weighed the same as the drachm which it succeeded, and was struck in all the local Eoman mints — Luceria, Vibo Valentia, Croton, Corcyra and the like. It also weighed the same as certain currencies of important trading cities in Illyricum, viz. , Apollonia and Dyrrhachium. Whether the victoriatus or the Illyric 1 Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 87. 2 N. H. 33. 46. 36 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS coinages on this standard came first we cannot know. In either case, the uniformity of system points to the importance of trade between Italy and the Illyric coast. But the way in which Eoman influence was, through the Eomano-Campanian coinage, pervading the Mediterranean coast is also shown by the facts that the latest Tarentine didrachms are based on a standard of 6 scruples, and that a great trading port like Massalia found it desirable to assimilate its standard to that of the Eomano-Campanian 3-scruple drachm. The victoriatus, then, was not part of the home coinage properly speaking, but a kind of feeler thrown out by Eome before she decided to make the denarius itself a world coinage. When she found herself able to do this, she abolished the victoriatus as a separate denomination, by equating it to the quinarius. This was effected by the Clodian law, about 104 B.C. 1 the crisis of the first punic war. 242 b.c. 20. Obv. Bust of Mars, r. wearing crested helmet, behind, lK Rev. Eagle r. on thunderbolt, flapping its wings ; below, ROMA. Gold. 60 sesterce piece. 3*41 grammes (52*6 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 27, No. 185. 1 On the significance of the victoriatus, as outlined above, see Haeberlin in Zeit.f. Num. xxvi., p. 238. 37 HISTOEICAL BOMAN COINS 21. Similar to preceding, but with, anchor as symbol on reverse. Gold. 60 sesterce piece. 3*34 grammes (51*5 grains). B.M.C. H., p. 155, No. 19. 22. Similar to No. 20, but with mark of value XXXX, and on reverse ROMA. Gold. 40 sesterce piece. 2*23 grammes (34*5 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 27, No. 187. 23. Similar to No. 20, but with mark of value XX, and on reverse ROMA- G-old. 20 sesterce piece. 1*12 grammes (17'2 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 27, No. 190. 24. Obv. Head of Eoma r. ; behind, X. Rev. The Dioscuri on horseback charging r. ; below horses, anchor ; on tablet, ROMA. Silver denarius. 4'06 grammes (62*7 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 155, No. 21. The date of the first issue of gold from the mint at Eome is a matter of much dispute. Pliny has a definite statement to the effect that the " gold coin was first struck 51 years after the silver, the scripulum being equivalent to 20 sestertii, and the pound there- fore amounting in value to 5760 sestertii of the time." 1 Fifty-one years from the introduction of the 1 N t H. 33. 47. His source here is probably not the same as that whence he derived the date 217 B.C. for the uncial reduction and the equation of the denarius to 16 asses (see below, Nos. 26, 27). The passage is tacked on, at the end of the section about coinage, some- what loosely, and looks like a note taken from some other authority. As regards the date, the good Bamberg MS. reads LI, the others LXIL 38 HISTORICAL KOMAN COINS denarius bring us to 218 or 217 B.C., according as we accept the Plinian or the Livian date for the earlier reform. Now it is a principle well-known to numis- matists, and evidently familiar also to ancient historians, that isolated gold coinages were usually initiated in times of monetary distress. There was no unusual strain on the Eoman finances in the year 218. 1 The Senate took no steps to raise extraordinary forces for the coming opening campaign. But after the disaster of Trasimene in April, 217, all the circum- stances were such as would justify the issue of a special gold coinage. "We have therefore here an independent confirmation 2 of the Livian (268) as against the Plinian date (269) for the introduction of the denarius. Now the date 217, to which the issue of gold coin is on this evidence assigned, has generally been accepted as correct. We have little pieces of gold of three denominations, with marks of value representing 60 (Nos. 20, 21), 40 (No. 22) and 20 (No. 23), and Willers [Corolla Numism., p. 314) corrects to LX, and makes the passage refer to the well-known gold Romano-Campanian coins with the oath-taking scene, which he assigns to 209 B.C. He has not made out his case ; see Haeberlin in Zeit. /. Num. xxvi., pp. 241 f. 1 See Mommsen, Hist, of Rome, or the passage from Neumann quoted by Willers, op. tit., p. 312. 2 The confirmation is not affected by the possibility that no such gold coinage was really struck in 217 b,o. We assume that Pliny's authority thought it was, and made his chronological reckoning accordingly. 39 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS equating them to as many sestertii respectively. The denominations weigh in scruples 3, 2 and 1 respec- tively. There is no reason to doubt that Pliny's authority had these coins in mind when he gave the value of the gold scruple in sesterces. Whether he is right in his date is quite another question. Count de Salis, in his arrangement of the British Museum collection, divided our gold pieces into two classes, (1) those of poor style, with moneyers' symbols, (2) those of good style, without symbols. The latter he assigned to Eome ; the others, with the corre- sponding denarii and bronze coins, he assigned to local mints ; and both classes, according to his chronological classification, belong to about 240 — 229 b.c. Now, what is the basis of this chronology ? If we take the gold pieces which bear symbols, and which were apparently issued at local mints, we find the following symbols : anchor, spear-head, staff, pentagon, ear of corn. The same symbols occur also on denarii and on bronze of the sextantal standard. But those who wish to maintain the later date of the gold pieces in question point out that four out of these five symbols, viz., the anchor, the spear-head, the staff, the pentagon, occur on denarii or bronze coins which must, owing to the bronze being uncial in standard, be ascribed to a later date, since the uncial standard superseded the sextantal in 217 B.C. It does not, however, follow from this that the gold coins must 40 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS belong to the later date, but only that we are free to make our choice between the two dates. The bulk of the evidence of the symbols points to the earlier, and so also does the style of the gold coins which, in the specimens assigned to the Eoman mint by de Salis, is very much better than the style of the denarii which belong to the years about 217 B.C. But if we accept de Salis's date, Pliny's statement as to the year in which gold was first struck at Eomc must be rejected. That statement may indeed well have been due to some antiquary's constructive imagination. We must not, as we have already seen, be misled by Pliny's circumstantiality. 1 There is nothing more easy than to be circumstantial in support of a conjecture. An antiquary, who had made up his mind that these gold coins were issued during the great Hannibalian crisis, would very naturally reckon back to see how many years it was since the intro- duction of the silver coinage. The fact that Pliny specifies this number of years adds no credibility to his statement. The modern archseologist bases his date, right or wrong, on the comparison between the gold coins themselves and the other objects with which they must have been contemporary, viz., the denarii 1 He is of course often demonstrably "wrong, and usually muddled ; but Mommsen (h\, p. 12) unnecessarily accuses him, or his and Festus's authority, Verrius Flaccus, of saying that the quadrigati and bigati were the most ancient denarii. The passage means no more than that the quadrigati and bigati were so called from their types. 41 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS and bronze coins, which by their weight or style are shown to belong to the period before the Hannibalian crisis. There is no other Eoman gold coinage which can reasonably be attributed to the year 217 or 218 B.C. If the theory described above is true, then either Pliny's source is untrustworlhy, or Pliny himself has mis- understood his authority, or such gold coins as were then struck have disappeared. Next let us examine de Salis's date, and see whether we can narrow its limits. His suggestion of 240 — 229 B.C. may be allowed to include a margin of a few years on either side. Now, in antiquity, such isolated gold coinages as we are discussing were, as we haye said, almost always issued during crises. A good instance is the gold coinage struck when the Arcadians seized Olympia in 365 B.C. and placed the conduct of the games in the hands of the Pisatans. 1 The exceptional gold issues of Athens dating from 407 and 338 b.c are well known. "Recently, a group of electrum coins struck by Chios and other Ionian states has been, with great probability, ascribed to the crisis of the Ionic Eevolt. 2 The types of the coins before us, be it noted, are distinctly martial. But in 240 b.c Eome had passed through her crisis. The 1 Eist. Greek Coins, p. 76. 2 P. Gardner, The Gold Coinage of Asia be/ore Alexander the Great in Proc, Brit Acad. iii. 42 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS First Punic "War was just over. The time was there- fore not apt for a special coinage. "We have, however, seen that, according to the most probable chronology, the sextantal standard was legalized as early as 268 B.C. So far, therefore, as we may argue from the sextantal bronze coins with which the local issues of gold are associated, that gold coinage may date back to 268 B.C. The denarii with symbols , on the other hand, do not seem to be of quite the earliest type. In fact, the mere appearance of the symbol is a sign that they are likely to be compara- tively late. It may be suggested, therefore, that the coinage in question belongs to the end of the First Punic War, in fact to that final crisis which imme- diately preceded the victory of Catulus at Aegusa (10 March, 241). We know that the fleet which won this battle was provided by private subscription. Two hundred ships manned by sixty thousand men : for such a force a special issue of coin must have been necessary. It is to this date then that we would conjecturally attribute the gold coins of 60, 40 and 20 sesterces, and the corresponding silver and bronze coins. Such is the argument in favour of an early date for the gold pieces of 60, 40 and 20 sesterces. The argu- ments against it, as summarized by Dr. Haeberlin, 1 1 In a private communication, for which I desire to express my indebtedness. 43 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS are: (1) if it is accepted, Pliny's evidence must be rejected ; (2) the fleet in 242 was raised by private efforts, not by the state ; (3) it is probable that a gold issue accompanied the uncial reform of 217, gold being tariffed above its real value ; and such an excessive value for gold suits no other year better than the crisis of 217 ; (4) the evidence from the symbols is not against the later date. With (1) and (4) we have already dealt. In reply to (2) it may be said that although the fleet was raised by voluntary efforts, money was necessary to pay the crews. Demarete voluntarily provided the treasure out of which the Demareteia were coined, but it was the state that coined them. 1 As regards (3), there was a crisis in 242, as there was in 217 ; though perhaps not so serious, it might easily have led to the issue of gold at a rate above its real value. the acquisition of corcyra. 229 b.c. 25. Obv. Head of Jupiter r., laureate. Rev. Victory crowning a trophy ; in exergue, ROyuvA ; in the field, monograms of KOPK and AT. Silver victoriatus. 2*77 grammes (42*7 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 197, No. 227. One of the consequences of the expedition to Scodra 1 Hist. Greek Coins, p. 38. 44 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS and the suppression of the Illyrian pirates in 229 B.C. was that Corcyra became an " ally " of Eome, under a Eoman governor. This was the first step of the Eomans across the Adriatic. Its importance is illus- trated by the fact that on, or soon after, the acquisi- tion of the island coins of distinctly Eoman character were struck there. The monograms containing the first three or four letters of the name of Corcyra, and the first two letters of the name of a Corcyraean magistrate (' Ay-qa-avhpos ?y are all that distinguish this vietoriatus and a contemporary quinarius from the victoriati and quinarii issued at Italian mints. The monogram of the name of Corcyra is of a form actually found on local coins, 2 so that there can be no doubt as to the attribution. We have already (p. 36) had to deal incidentally with the origin of the vietoriatus. It is hardly necessary to say that the existence of this particular vietoriatus, with the mint- mark of Corcyra, which could not have been issued before 229 B.C., does not prove that no victoriati were issued before that date. The actual course of events was probably that at a somewhat earlier period the Eomans began by issuing victoriati from Eome itself, although they were intended, as we have seen (p. 37), for extra-Eoman currency. Then, when 1 This was the name of a Corcyraean prytanis ; see F. Lenormant in Bev.Nwm., 1868, p. 152. 3 B.M.C. Thessaly to Aetolia, pp. 140 ff. 45 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS more mints were established in the peninsula, they issued victoriati with local mint marks, such as L, C, B, H, or VB in monogram : marks which have been assigned to Luceria, Canusium, Beneventum, Her- donea and Yibo Yalentia. The Corcyra mint-mark ranks with these. It is a general rule that of two similar series of coins, one with and the other without differentiating marks, the former is the earlier, since such differentiae are usually due to increasing com- plexity of organization. APTER TRASIMENE. 217 B.C. 26. Obv. Head of Eoma r., in winged helmet; behind, X. Rev. The Dioscuri on horseback, charging r. ; below, on tablet, ROMA ; symbol, prow r. Silver denarius. 4*02 grammes (62*0 grains). B.M.O. L, p. 54, No. 448. 27. Obv. Head of Jupiter r., laureate; behind, S. Rev. Prow r. ; below, ROMA ; above, symbol, prow r. ; to r. S- Bronze semis. 14*64 grammes (226*0 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 54, No. 454. The reduction of the bronze as from the weight of two ounces to one is by general consent dated to the crisis of the Hannibalian war. Verrius Flaccus, an 46 PL. IX Nos. 13—27. HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS antiquary of the Augustan age, is the authority l for the statement : numerum aeris perduct[um esse ad xvi in denario lege Fla]minia minus solvendi, cu[m Hannibalis bello premere]tur populus romanus. Pliny 2 is probably, though not certainly, quoting from the same source when he says : " When Hannibal was pressing the Romans hard, in the dictatorship of Q. Fabius Maximus, the as was made uncial, and it was decided that the denarius should exchange for 16 asses, the quinarius for eight, the sestertius for four. Thus the state made a gain of a half " (the as having been previously of the weight of two unciae)^ " but, in paying military wages one denarius was always given for 10 asses V On this stage in the develop- ment of the Eoman coinage some further light is thrown by a passage of Zonaras: 3 "Hieron sent many contributions, of which the Eomans accepted only the corn and a figure of Victory, although they were in such pecuniary straits that they adulterated with bronze the silver money which had hitherto been unadulterated and pure." Another passage of Pliny relating to this same year 217, and the supposed first issue of gold money, has already been discussed (above, p. 21). There is a contradiction between the passages of 1 Apud Festum, p. 347, quoted by Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 11. 2 N. H., 33. 45. 3 8.26. 47 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS Pliny and of Festus, since, as Mommsen points out, Flaminius was dead before Fabius became dictator. If the reform was due to a lex Flaminia, it must have been promulgated before the battle of Trasimene. But the dictatorship of Fabius is probably, and very naturally, used to date the whole year, although he only held office for part of it. The authorities are silent on another important change which was made in this year. The weight of the denarius was reduced by about one-sixth. It had previously weighed about 4*55 grammes (4 scruples); it henceforth weighed about 3*90 grammes (3^ scruples), 1 or -^ of a pound instead of ^. Denarii of about this weight (No. 26) are associated with the uncial as and its divisions, such as the semis (No. 27). It will be noticed that the two coins illustrated have the same differentia, a prow. Since the denarius now weighed -£% of the pound and was, as we are told, the equivalent of 16 asses of uncial weight, it follows that -^ lb. of silver was the equivalent of if lb. of bronze, so that the relation of silver to bronae was 112 : l. a The annual stipendium of the soldier was 1200 asses. For this he continued to receive 120 denarii, and not 75 only, as he would have done had he been 1 It is significant that this is the weight of the Carthaginian drachm. Haeberlin, Metrolog. Grundlagen, p. 61, note. if X 84 = 112. 48 HISTOKICAL ROMAN COINS subjected to the new rate. Later, Julius Caesar trebled the number of asses in the stipendium, giving 3600 instead of 1200 ; but he reckoned these asses at the modern rate of 16 to the denarius, so that he paid his soldiers 225 denarii a year. 1 The fact that in 217 B.C. the number of asses for which a denarius was given, in estimating the pay of the Eoman legionary, remained unchanged, is supposed to account for the retention of the mark of value X. That mark, indeed, was probably by this time regarded as denoting the name rather than the value of the coin. The numerals XVI appear for a short time on denarii which may be dated about 140 B.C. 2 Still later (about 125), the form * appears, and becomes usual. This does not mean XV I, as some have supposed, but is merely X differentiated as denominational mark by means of a horizontal stroke. The stroke was more often, in such cases, placed above the letter; but a passage of Maecianus 3 con- firms the explanation just given, for besides the form * for denarius he gives a V similarly erased as the mark of the quinarius. The quinarius was not issued again until the end of the second century; when it reappeared, it was marked with a Q . 1 Tao. Ann., i., 17. 8 Ghrueber, B.M.C., Rom. Rep., i., p. 118. 3 Hultsch, Metrol. Script., u. } p. 66. H.E.C. E 49 HISTORICAL EOMAN COINS HANNIBAL IN CAPUA. 216—215 B.C. 28. Obv. Janiform head of Persephone, wearing corn- wreath. Rev. Jupiter in quadriga r., driven by Victory ; he holds sceptre in 1. and wields thunder- bolt in r. Electrum. 2*79 grammes (43'0 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 139, No. 147. The attribution of these coins, as regards date and mint, is more or less conjectural ; but the conjecture 1 has been generally accepted. The types, on the obverse recalling, on the reverse actually repeating, the types of the quadrigati (see No. 10), identify the mint, without possibility of reasonable doubt, as Capua. But instead of the beardless head of Janus, we have a janiform head of a divinity wearing a wreath of corn-ears, in which every person acquainted with the coins of Carthage will recognize a janiform representation of the goddess Persephone, as the artists of the later Carthaginian issues conceived her. She is made janiform in order to appeal as familiar to the Campanians who had long used the quadrigati. These very Campanians had been accustomed to good honest gold, silver and bronze ; electrum now made its first appearance in Italy. The Carthaginians had for some 1 Due chiefly to Percy Gardner, Num. Chron. 1884, pp. 220 f. 50 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS time been issuing coins in this somewhat unsatisfactory- mixture, an expedient to which they had been driven by the gradual loss of their wealthy possessions in Sicily and Spain. Finally, the weight is peculiar ; the maximum seems to be 3*10 grammes (47-9 grains). Now that is very close to the weight of the Cartha- ginian electrum coins of the period 218 — 146 B.C. 1 The conclusion is irresistible that we have here Carthaginian coins struck at a Campanian mint, which is tantamount to saying that they were issued when Hannibal was in possession of Capua. They illustrate the Punic art of slily adapting the coinage of their neighbours, with slight modifications, an art which is vividly displayed in the case of the earliest Siculo- Punic coinage. 2 m. aemiutts lepidus and ptolemaetjs v. 201 b.c. 29. Obv. Head of the City of Alexandria (ALEXAN- DREA) r., wearing turreted crown. Rev. M. Aemilius Lepidus placing a wreath on the head of Ptolemaeus V., who holds a sceptre; inscription, M LEPIDVS TVTOR i L. Miiller, Num. de Vane. Afrique, ii., p. 86, Nos. 70 — 73 ; max. 3*05 grammes (47*1 grains). 2 Hill, Coins of Ancient Sicily, PL X. E 2 5] HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS REGpONPMAXSC(the NF ligatured to represent NTIF). Silver denarius. 3*98 grammes (61*5 grains). B.M.O. I., p. 449, No. 3648. This coin was struck about 65 b.c. by M. Aemilius Lepidus, a descendant of the person whom it com- memorates. Other coins of the same date and money er represent (1) the equestrian statue, granted by the Senate, of one Aemilius Lepidus, who as a boy of fifteen slew an enemy in battle and saved the life of a Roman citizen ; (2) the Basilica Aemilia. The inscription on the former is MLEPIDVS AIMXV' PRHOCS' Yalerius Maximus tells the story, and uses the phrase progressus in actem. Consequently the abbreviations have been resolved : an(norum) XV. pr(ogressus) h(ostem) o(ccisit) c(ivem) s(ervavit). But the participle progressus can hardly be used absolutely. 1 A better suggestion is praetextatus^ although his standing is sufficiently indicated by AN -XV. 2 It seems to be generally assumed, without 1 Mr. George Macdonald suggests that, in view of the extraordinary coincidence between the words of Valerius Maximus [progressus in aciem hostem interemit, civem servavit) and the inscription on the coin, progressus may after all be right ; Valerius Maximus, or his authority, may be quoting (from memory) the actual inscription of which the coin gives a shorthand version. But these abbreviated inscriptions on Homan coins show a curious conscientiousness on the part of the engravers, who represent every word of the original in some way (cf. No. 96). 2 There is no stop between the P and the R, otherwise P(opuli) R(omani), qualifying H(ostem), would be possible. 52 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS any evidence, that this youthful hero was the man who is represented on No. 29 as "tutor" of the young Egyptian King. As regards the Basilica Aemilia, that was built by the propraetor M. Aemilius Lepidus out of the plunder which he accumulated during his governorship of Sicily in 80 B.C. The moneyer was probabljr the son of this propraetor. The man with whom we are at present concerned was despatched in 201 B.C. with two others (who, though older than he, played a subordinate part throughout) to Egypt and Syria, in order to secure the support of their rulers against Philip Y. 1 At the time, Ptolemaeus V. was a minor, and two writers, not indeed of the highest authority, seem to confirm the statement of the coin that Aemilius acted as the king's guardian. Valerius Maximus 2 tells us that Ptolemaeus IV. had by his will appointed the Eoman people guardians of his son, and that the Senate despatched as its representatives three men, including M. Aemilius Lepidus, Pontifex Maximus and twice consul. 8 Further, Justin confirms the statement about 1 Polybius xvi. 27. 5 ; Liv. xxxi. 2. 3. 2 VI. 6. 1. " Niese, Gesch. d. gr. u. mak. St. ii., p. 637 note, argues that this description implies a later date, since Lepidus was not consul H. until 175 B.C. He might have added that he was not pontifex maximus until 180 B.C. It is more surprising to find that even by Mommsen-Blacas (ii., p. 501, note) Valerius is also accused of a "faute de chronologic." Obviously the titles " twice consul" and " pontifex maximus" are only used by Valerius, as by the designer 53 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS the will of Ptolemaeus IV., 1 and says that the Alex- andrians demanded a regent from the Komans, who were only too glad of this excuse for interference. 3 A third writer, who commands more respect, Tacitus, 3 also reminds his readers that "maioresM. Lepidum Ptolemaei liberis tutorem in Aegyptum miserant." There was, then, certainly a very distinct belief, as early as the period of our denarius, ue n about 65 B.C., that the mission of Aemilius to Egypt was prompted by the demand, expressed either by Ptolemaeus IV. or by the Alexandrians, for the interference of Kome. Now, modern criticism 4 has discovered that there is " no room " f or a Eoman guardian of the king at this period. Of guardians the little Ptolemaeus has first Agathokles, then Tlepolemos, and then Aristomenes. Also, Polybius and Livy say nothing about such a function being fulfilled by Aemilius. In any case, he left Egypt very soon, for we hear of him anywhere rather than in that country. It seems, however, unnecessary to conclude that the story of the guar- dianship is entirely a myth of comparatively late origin. Whether the will of Ptolemaeus IV. appointed of the coin, to distinguish this Aemilius from others, not with chronological significance. 1 XXXI. i. 2. 9 XXX. ii. 8 ; iii. 3 f. Mittitur et M. Lepidus in Aegyptum, qui tutorio nomine regnum pupilli administret. 8 Annal. ii. 67. 4 See Niese, loc. cit., and Svoronos, Munzen der Ptol., IV. 260 ff. 54 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS Borne the guardian of his son or not, we can well imagine that the Romans would take full advantage of any claim, real or invented, to such a title. It might be used diplomatically, and yet not find a place in the narrative of a Polybius or a Livy. It seems reason- able, therefore, to believe that the story of this guardianship is founded upon fact, although some elements of exaggeration may have made their way into the family tradition. Count de Salis attributed the coin with which we are dealing to the year 65 B.C., approximately. The date is based on the stylistic connexion between this moneyer's coins and the coins of Q. Pomponius Musa and M. Piso M. f . Frugi, which de Salis assigns, on different grounds, to 67 and 66 B.C. respectively. Mommsen, on the other hand, prefers the date 61, since about that time negotiations, upon which the fate of Egypt hung, were going on at Rome. There is, it is true, no reason to assume that the type must have been inspired by some event of the moment ; it was chosen primarily as an illustration of the moneyer's family history. Nevertheless, there may well have been some such connexion with current events. We know that Ptolemaeus Auletes spent the greater part of his reign and much of his fortune in attempts to obtain the support of Rome. Some circumstances in his intrigues even as early as 65 b.c may therefore well have inspired the type. 55 HISTORICAL EOMAN COINS The denarius which we have been discussing bears neither the word ROMA nor those types which were characteristic of this class of coin in its first stages. In our next section we shall see how the original character of the denarius was gradually modified during the second century. Both these modi- fications, and the disappearance, at a still later date, of the word ROMA, seem to have been due to the same ultimate cause, viz., the gradual development of the denarius into a world- currency, and the elimination of its rivals. 1 CHANGES IN THE DENARIUS. SECOND CENTURY B.C. 30. Obv. Head of Eoma r., in winged helmet ; behind, X Rev. Luna, with crescent on forehead, in chariot r. drawn by two galloping horses ; below, a prawn, and (on tablet) ROMA- Silver denarius, 3*95 grammes (60*9 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 75, No. 585. 31. Obv. Similar to No. 30. Rev. Yictory, winged, in chariot r. drawn by two galloping horses; below, VrSAVF (the VF ligatured) and ROMA (on tablet). Silver denarius. 4*06 grammes (62*7 grains). B.M.C. L, p. Ill, No. 834 1 See Macdonald, Coin Types, p. 185. 56 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS 32. Olv, Similar to No. 30, but behind the head a one-handled jug. Rev. She-wolf suckling the twins Komulus and Remus ; in the background the ruminal fig-tree with birds perched on it ; on the 1. the shepherd Faustulus leaning on staff and raising r. hand; around, SEXTOM. [FO]STLVS ; in exergue, ROMA. Silver denarius. 3*89 grammes (60'0 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 132, No. 927. These three pieces serve well to illustrate the character of the changes through which the denarius passed in the first three quarters of the second cen- tury. No. 30, according to de Salis's classification, belongs to the period 196 — 173 B.C.; No. 31 to the period 172—151 ; andNo. 32 to the period 150—125. The definitions of these periods are, it must be remembered, somewhat conjectural ; but it may be taken as certain that all three coins belong to the first 75 years of the century, and that they are arranged, relatively to each other, in chronological order. The reverse of No. 30 gives us the earliest varia- tion from the original denarius type of the Dioscuri. The goddess is generally described as Diana ; some- times as " Diana or Luna." It is, however, preferable to distinguish her as Luna. The two deities were for long kept distinct ; and Diana, as worshipped at Rome in early times, was the Latin goddess of the 57 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS type known in the famous sanctuary of Aricia. She was essentially the goddess of childbirth and the helper of women. It is doubtful whether she would be represented as the goddess is represented on our coin, although figures of the Diana Nemorensis from Nemi do represent her, owing to Greek influence, as a huntress. If we could suppose the coin-type to be meant for the Eomano- Greek Diana- Artemis, we should have an interesting historical combination, accounting for her appearance on the coins at this time. For in 187 b.c. the consul M. Aemilius Lepidus, during his campaign against the Ligurians, vowed a temple to Diana, which he dedicated during his censorship in 179. * But it is probable that the Greek Artemis would also have been represented as the huntress-goddess, even as we find her on the coins issued at Syracuse just before this period, during the democracy of 215 — 212 B.C. The goddess on our coins is so evidently characterized as Luna or the Moon that we have no justification for calling her anything else. Now this goddess was much revered at Kome. Her chief temple, said to have been founded by Servius Tullius, 2 lay on the slope of the Aventine, 1 Liv. xxxix. 2, xl. 52. This, and a temple of Iuno Regina, dedicated at the same time, were in the neighbourhood of the Circus Flaminius. 2 Ovid, Fast. iii. 883 ; Tac. Ann. xv. 41. In 182 b.c. a storm forem ex aede Lunae, quae in Aventino est, raptam tulit, et in posticis partibus Cereris templi affixit (Liv. xl. 2). 58 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS ad circum maximum. The other shrines, such as that of Noctiluca on the Palatine, 1 seem to have been less important. "Was there any historical reason for the adoption of the moon-goddess as a coin-type during the period to which these coins are attributed ? The only event which seems to suggest itself is the reform of the calendar which took place, by the provisions of the lex Acilta, in the year 191 B.C. The calendar 3 had fallen into serious confusion in the year 207 B.C., when the principle of intercalation was given up. Apparently it was thought that the sun-god Apollo was offended because the expression in the calendar of his annual course was distorted by contamination with the foreign lunar element. So the intercalary month was dropped, and it was not until the year 191 that the consul M' Acilius Glabrio effected a reform. The details of this may not be quite certain, but there is no doubt that it had to do with the restoration of something like the old system. The moon, therefore, may be regarded as having come to her own again, and it is hardly fanciful to conjecture that such a change may have been commemorated by the intro- duction of the type of Luna into the coinage. If so, we may date the first appearance of these coins to the year of the consulship of Acilius, 191 b.c. 1 Hor. Carm. iy. 6. 38. 2 For an account of this episode, see Unger, Zeitrechnung, in Iwan Mutter's Handbuch, i 2 . pp. 804 f. 59 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS The coin of L. Saufeius bears the device of Victory in a biga, another of the types which helped to break down the monopoly of the Dioscuri. It is probably to coins like this and the preceding that Tacitus refers when he alludes to the popularity among the northern barbarians of the coins bearing a biga. 1 If we seek a motive for the adoption in the period 172 — 151 of Victory as a new type for the denarius we may find it in the signal successes which in this period attended the Eoman arms. The crushing defeat of Antiochus the Great at Magnesia in 190 B.C. had placed the whole of the Levant virtually at the feet of Rome. But even more striking, because much nearer home, was the victory at Pydna in 168 — that final humiliation of the Greeks which allowed Eome to enter upon the inheritance of Alexander the Great. It is not surprising that such a change in her position should be reflected in the coinage. The type of Sex. Pompeius Fostlus, on the other hand, is one of those personal types which began to appear once it was felt that change in the reverse type of the denarius was permissible. The process is characteristic of Eoman historical development : first, complete uniformity ; then the beginnings of change, 1 Germ. 5 : pecuniam probant veterem et diu notam, aerratos higatosque. The serrati are the coins with notched or serrated edges, regarding which see No. 47. 60 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS but still without the obvious intrusion of the personal element ; finally, the domination of the individual. 1 Behind the wolf and twins stands the ficus rumimlis, which once shaded the Lupercal, or cave in which Bomulus and Eemus were suckled by the she-wolf. Of the birds, which on good specimens may be made out on the tree, one should be the picus Martis, the woodpecker sacred to Mars. 2 The type is either merely a "canting" type, referring to the cognomen of the moneyer Sex. Pompeius (or Pomponius) Fostlus, 3 or else, as is more probable, it indicates a claim on his part to be descended from Faustulus, the shepherd who rescued the twins. In any case, the reference of the type is strictly personal. The one- handled vase which occurs as a symbol on all the coins of this moneyer, irrespective of their type, has been explained, presumably in jest, as a milk-jug, because the she-wolf is giving her milk to the twins. 4 The initials of the moneyers began to be placed on the coins during the period 217 — 197 B.C. It was 1 See Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 43, and Macdonald, Coin Types, pp. 190 f. 2 On most other representations (e.g., the gems in Botticher, Baumkultus, fig. 37 ; Furtwangler, AntiJce Qemmen, PL xxviii., 58) only one bird is to be seen ; on the Bolsena mirror (Mon. delV Institute, xi., PI. 3. 1) there appear an owl and a woodpecker. 3 Eoman moneyers were very fond of "canting" types. See Macdonald, Coin Types, p. 188. 4 Babelon, Monn. de la Rip. Romaine, ii., p. 336; by Mommsen- Blacas, ii., p. 503, the vase is also described as a milk-jug. 61 HISTORICAL KOMAN COINS about this time, it would seem, that the cousuls lost the right of coiuage -within the city. Consequently the special board of magistrates, tresviri monetales^ appointed from time to time when money was needed, naturally began to leave their mark on the coinage. We find first of all only symbols, then initials, then abbreviations of a less scanty kind, and finally a full indication of the moneyer's name. C. MINUCIUS AUGURINUS. CIRCA 150 — 125 B.C. 33. Olv. Head of Eomar., wearing winged helmet; under chin, X ; behind, ROMA- Rev. Corinthian column, supporting a figure of L. Minucius Augurinus, resting on staff and holding ears of corn (?) ; from the capital hang bells ; at the base, lions' heads surmounted by ears of corn ; on r., M. Minucius Faesus standing, togate, holding a lituus; on 1., L. (or P.) Minucius Augurinus standing, togate, holding a dish and a loaf, his 1. foot resting on a corn measure ; 1 above, CAVG. Silver denarius, 3*86 grammes (59*5 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 136, No. 953. A. B. Cook, J. H. S. xxii., p. 19, describes him as clapping cymbals, with his foot on a ball. But his left hand and right hand hold the objects differently. 62 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS The popular hero of the Minucia gens was L. Minucius Augurinus, who as praefectus annonae in 439 B.C., when there was a serions famine, obtained a supply of corn from abroad, and in three market days lowered the price of corn to a maximum of one as for a modius. The grateful people erected to him a brazen statue on a column outside the Porta Trigemina, everyone subscribing an uncia} The column, with the statue on it, is represented on the coin. The two figures at the sides of the monument have been explained as other members of the family. The man on the right, holding the augur's wand, may then be M. Minucius Faesus, one of the first plebeian augurs to be elected after the passing of the lex Ogulnia in 300 B.C. 2 The man on the left may be either the praefectus annonae himself — admiring his own monument — or P. Minucius Augurinus, a still earlier public benefactor, who as consul in 492 B.C. relieved a famine by obtaining supplies from abroad. 3 But it is quite possible that the augur on the right is merely a canting allusion to the moneyer's cognomen, while the figure on the left may also have some allusive significance which escapes us. The ears of corn flanking the monument need no 1 Plin. N. E. xviii. 4 ; xxxiv. 11. This, Pliny thinks, was perhaps the first honour of the kind conferred by the people, not by the Senate. Op. Dion. Hal. Tre/ai e7rt/3ouAuiv, p. xxxvi, ed. C. Mueller. 2 Liv. x. 9. * Liv. ii. 34. 63 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS explanation. Tlie lions' heads may be either purely- ornamental or apotropaic ; less probably they were fountains. The bells are difficult to explain. It has been thought that they were used to announce the opening and closing of the corn market ; 1 but what possible market was held outside the Porta Trigemina, which led through the walls below the north-west slope of the Aventine, close to the Tiber ? Like the bells on the facade of the second temple of Jupiter Capitolinus, they were probably prophylactic, 2 though why they should be used here we cannot say. It is, however, significant that one of the most important rites performed by the augurs was augurare vineta vtrgetaque, apparently with the object of protecting the crops in general from damage by drought. 3 Bells may have played some part in this ceremony. 4 This coin is attributed to the third quarter of the second century. A certain C. Minucius Augurinus, 1 Babelon, ii,, p. 228. 2 A. B. Cook in J. H. 8., loc. eft. 3 Wissowa in Pauly- Wissowa, fiealencycl,, ii. 2329. 4 The bells and the lions' heads recall the Dipon or Diwat, a granite pillar at Mahoba in India. " Its name is derived from the practice of placing a lamp, or dip, on its summit on stated occasions. But this certainly could not have been the original purpose of the pillar, as it is crowned with a broad, flat-topped capital, and does not possess a single receptacle for a lamp. It is a single shaft 18 ft. in height . . . the uppermost (portion) is ornamented with four chains, and bells suspended from four lions' heads immediately beneath the capital." Alex. Cunningham, Archceol. Survey of India, Reports, Vol. ii. (1871), p. 443. 64 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS perhaps the moneyer's father, was tribune of the plebs in 187 B.C. The Ti. Minucius C. f. Augurinus, who a little later struck coins with a very similar representa- tion of the ancestral monument, was doubtless the son of our Caius. T. QTJINCTIUS FLAMININUS. CIRCA 124 103 B.C. 34. Obv. Head of Romar., in winged helmet; behind, flamen's apex ; under chin, X. Rev. The Dioscuri on horseback, charging r. ; below, T Q and round Macedonian shield ; in exergue, ROMA. Silver denarius. 3*88 grammes (59'8 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 155, No. 1040. The moneyer who issued this denarius — which is dated by some to a slightly earlier period — must have been a descendant of T. Quinctius Flamininus, who won the battle of Cynoscephalae in 197 B.C., since the letters T Q on the reverse, combined with the flawed $ cap on the obverse, clearly represent a person of this name, while the Macedonian shield indicates a Mace- donian victory, as on the coins of M. CaeciliusMetellus. 1 This being so, we can see a special significance in the use of the type of the Dioscuri here, for it was at this time no longer the ordinary type of the denarius^ and we know that the conqueror of Philip V. made a 1 Babelon, i., p. 269. H.R.C. y 65 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS special dedication to the Dioscuri at Delphi. The objects dedicated were silver bucklers (ao-mSas) and his own scutum (rbv kavrov flvpeoV). 1 The bucklers were doubtless Macedonian bucklers, one of which is represented on the coin under the figures of the Zyvhs Kpatirvdia-i yeyaOoTes hnTO7} Bok^os /*ev TrapaStSovs, SvXXas Be irapa\ap./3dvu)v rbv *loyop6av. Id. Mar, 10 ; Praec. ger. reip. xii. ; Plin. N. H. xxxyii. 4. 9 ; Val. Max. viii. 14. 4 (Bern.). * Plut. Mar. 32 ; Sulla, 6. 3 Veil. Paterc. ii. 25 : privileges granted after Sulla's victory over Norbanus to the shrine of Diana Tifatina near Capua. See also the inscriptions cited by Wissowa in Pauly-Wissowa, Realencycl. v. 327. i Veil. Paterc. ii. 27. 6 See supra, p. 53. 71 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS MARIUS AND THE BARBARIANS. 104—101 B.C. ( 41.) Obv. Head of Apollo r., laureate ; behind, C* EGNATVLEIC F ; below, Q (NAT and VL ligatured). Rev. Victory standing L, writing on oval shield, which is fastened to a trophy, on which are a helmet with bull's horns, cuirass and spear ; at the foot of the trophy is a war trumpet (karnyz) ; in the field, Q ; in the exergue, ROMA. Silver quinarius. 1*85 grammes (28'5 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 165, No. 1077. ( 42. Obv. Head of Jupiter r., laureate ; under chin, -B* Rev. Victory standing r., holding palm branch and wreath which she is about to place on trophy ; at foot of trophy, a seated captive and a karnyx ; in field, downwards, T* CLOVLI (VL ligatured) ; in exergue, Q. Silver quinarius. 1'83 grammes (28'3 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 168, No. 1105. The quinarius had fallen into disuse before the end of the third century ; it was revived by the lex Clodia. Pliny tells us i 1 Is qui nunc victoriatus appellator lege Clodia percussus est. antea enim hie nummus ex Illyrico advectus mercis loco habebatur. est autem 1 N. H. xxxiii. 3. 46. 72 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS signatus Victoria et inde nomen. These victoriati were not the coins originally so-called, but new quinarii with somewhat similar types. Pliny's remark about Illyricum is generally admitted to be a blunder. He confounds the Roman victoriate with the Illyrian coin of the same value. 1 The date of the lex Clodia is conjectural. Quinarii of the new sort were struck by M. Cato, who died in 91 b.c, and the similar pieces of T. Cloulius (No. 42), C. Fundanius, C. Egnatule'ius (No. 41), and P. Sabinus are older still. 2 The law is generally assigned to about 104 B.C. The coins with which we are at present concerned doubtless belong to the period immediately following the enactment, for there are none older in style. The types of the reverses evidently allude to a victory over some northern barbarians, since the horned helmet, 3 the shield, and the war trumpet are of northern, apparently Keltic, type ; the last being particularly associated with the Kelts. The barbarians in question can hardly be other than some of those defeated by Marius at Aquae Sextiae or at Vercellae. At the former battle the tribes concerned were the Teutons — generally re- garded as Germans — and the Ambrones, a Gallic tribe. The Cimbri, who were crushed at Vercellae, 1 Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 87, note 2. 2 Id. ii., p. 101. 8 See Mowat in Gazette archeohgique, 1887, p. 130. 73 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS have been claimed both as Kelts and as Germans ; among the ancients the evidence of most of the earlier writers is in favour of their Keltic origin, while later authors (who knew the Germans better) called them Germans. But even if the Cimbri were Germans, we know so little about German armour at this date that it would be rash to deny that the Cimbri may- have employed armour and trumpets such as are repre- sented on our coins. It is therefore impossible to determine whether the reference is to a victory over any one particular tribe ; and, indeed, it is most reasonable to assume that the reference is quite general to the victories over the northern barbarians ; accuracy in distinguishing the armour of the various foes of Eome is hardly to be demanded of a die engraver. De Salis assigned the coins to the years 102 and 101 ; the latter date seems on the whole the more probable. The letter Q is generally explained as a mark of value (for quinarius). The value of this coin, it must be remembered, was now 8 asses, and could no longer be strictly expressed by V, as on the earliest issue. Had the Q only occurred on the obverse, in close connexion with the name of the moneyer — as a matter of fact it is separated from the name — we should have been justified in explaining it as Quaesto?*, 1 and in supposing that Egnatuleius, for 1 So Lenormant, La Monn. dans Vant. ii, p. 293. 74 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS I instance, was one of Marius's quaestors, who struck I coins for use in the Gallic war. But the nearly, if not quite, contemporary quinarii of T. Cloulius all have Q on the reverse only, and on the obverse a series of letters differentiating the various issues. These letters are a striking proof of the enormous quantity of dies which must have been used, for it appears that each letter marks a different die. That is to say, it is not to be supposed that, after a number of coins had been struck from a die bearing the letter B, that letter was erased and another engraved on the same die. A complete new die, marked with the next letter, C, was engraved. There are three series of these letters in the coinage of Cloulius, according as the letters are placed behind, below, or in front of the neck of Jupiter ; in each series the whole alphabet is represented ; and finally, the varieties are multiplied by placing dots at the sides of, below or above the letters. In the British Museum Catalogue alone Mr. Grueber enumerates 33 varieties of this quinarius coinage. C. COELIUS CALDUS. HIS ACHIEVEMENTS, 107 94 B.C. 43. Obv. Head, r., of C. Coelius Caldus ; behind, a tablet with the letters L. D. ; inscr. C-COEL-CALDVS COS. 75 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS Rev. Head of Sol r., radiate ; in front, circular shield ; behind, oblong shield with thunderbolt device ; inscr. CALDVSi IIIVIR. Silver denarius. 3"97 grammes (61*3 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 474, No. 3833. 44. Obv. Similar head and inscription ; behind, a vexillum inscribed HIS ; in front, a standard in the form of a boar. Rev. An epulo preparing a lectisternium ; at either end of the couch, a trophy, one with circular, the other with oblong shield; inscr. LCALDVS VIIVIREPVL- OCALDVSIMPAX, and CALDVSIM VI R (various ligatures). Silver denarius. 4*15 grammes (64'1 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 475, No. 387. The descendants of C. Coelius Caldus were extremely proud of their ancestor, the homo novus to whom the honourable position of the family in the last century of the Eepublic was due. These coins were struck by C. Coelius Caldus, his grandson ; their precise date is uncertain, some (as Mommsen) giving them to about 54 B.C., while de Salis prefers 61 b.c. The moneyer, as one of the monetary triumvirate, signs his coins Caldus Illvir. The elder C. Coelius Caldus was tribune of the plebs in 106 B.C. In this capacity he impeached 76 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS C. Popilius Laenas, who, when the consul Cassius Longinus, the year before, had been defeated and killed by the Tigurini, came to terms with the enemy and brought off the army, with the loss of their baggage and their honour. In order to secure a con- viction, Coelius passed his lex tabellaria, introducing the method of voting by tablets into the court of perduelliO) from which it had hitherto been excluded — doluitque, says Cicero (de Leg. iii. 16. 36), quoad vixit se ut opprimeret C. Popilium nocuisse rei publicae. The tablet behind the head of Coelius on No. 43 bears the initials of the words Libero, Damno. Coelius was praetor in Hispania Citerior about 99, 1 and it is to his achievements in this province that the vexillum with the inscription HlS(pania) and the Keltic boar standard refer. The same reference is, according to some authorities, also intended by the shields on the reverse of No. 43 and on the trophies on the reverse of No. 44. The head of the Sun would then perhaps be used in allusion to the names of the family. 2 Still, Borghesi's sugges- tion that it refers rather to some victory won by a member of the family in the East is tempting. For we find one C. Coelius C.f. (i.e., either the founder of the family or his son) mentioned in the so-called 1 See Wiladorf in Leipziger Studien, i., p. 110. 2 As Vaillant puts it (Num. ant fam. Rom. i., p. 292; cp. Eckhel, Num. vet. v., p. 1*76) : quod sol in coelo videatur et caldus sit. 77 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS Senatus consultum Adramyttenum as a Senator of praetorian rank. 1 In the latter case, the circular shield, if not the oblong one, may well represent an Eastern enemy. The lectisternium type (No. 44) 2 commemorates L. Coelius Caldus, probably a younger son of the elder Caius, and father of the moneyer. He was septemvir epulonum, and it is probably he who is represented preparing the ledum, on which the gods were supposed to recline at the repast offered to them. A third member of the moneyer's family, probably his uncle, is the C. Caldus mentioned on the same coin as Imp(erator) A(ugur) X(vir sacris faciundis). It is to be noted that the name and titles of this member of the family are written close to the trophies, thus confirming the suggestion that the trophies (and the corresponding shields on the reverse of No. 43) refer not to the Spanish victories of the elder C. Coelius Caldus, but to some exploits of the moneyer's uncle of the same name. These exploits, as we have seen, may have been partly in the East. 1 The date of the inscription is uncertain : Mommsen (Eph. Epigr. iv., pp. 216 f. ; Staatsr. iii., 986 note), supported by Foucart (Bull. Corr. Hellen. ix. 401), gives it to 122—120 B.C.; Viereck (Sermo Oraecus, pp. 22 f.), foUowing Willems, prefers 98 — 94 B.C., on the ground of its containing thin very name, C. Coelius Caldus. 2 If the curved object attached to the trophy with the oblong shield is a karnyx, and not a lituus militaris, then this trophy must refer to a victory over Grauls or Celtiberians. But, even so, the trophy with the round shield may still be Eastern. 78 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS THE CORN LAW OP SATURNINUS. 100 B.C. 45. Obv. Head of Saturn r., laureate; behind, a ser- rated sickle; around, PISO.CAEriO.Q; below, a trident. Rev. L. Calpurnius Piso and Q. Servilius Caepio seated on a bench, at each end of which is an ear of corn ; in exergue, AD.FRV. EM[V]EXSC Silver denarius. 3'76 grammes (58*0 grains). B.M.C. I., p, 170, No. 1127. The author of the Rhetorica ad Herennium (I. xii. 21) takes as an instance of a legitimate issue arising out of a definition, the question whether Q. Caepio 1 violated the majesty of the Eoman people when he prevented the tribune Saturninus from carrying his corn law. He was quaestor urhanus at the time, and when L. Appuleius Saturninus proposed his lex fru- mentaria de semissibus et trientibus, by which the state was to let the people buy corn at a semis and a triens (i.e., % of an as) for a modius, he urged that such a dole would break the treasury. The Senate decreed that the measure proposed was unconstitutional. Satur- ninus defied the veto of his colleagues ; Caepio 1 Probably the eon of the Q. Caepio who was responsible for the disaster of Arausio in 105, and in whose condemnation Saturninus took a leading part. 79 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS thereupon broke up the comitia and for the time prevented the law being carried ; hence the charge brought against him. It appears from Appian (B. C. i. 30) that Caepio's interference was fruitless, since the Marian veterans, who swarmed in the city, in their turn drove Caepio's "viri boni" from the forum, the voting was resumed, and the Appuleian law was passed. Saturninus's proposal reduced the price of corn per bushel from 6£ asses to the nominal sum of f as. Numismatic writers have generally assumed that the lex frumentaria was not carried, but that the Senate found it necessary to soothe the populace with a dole, and that they accordingly instructed the quaestors to buy corn largely, and decreed an appropriation from the treasury to this end. It would follow that these coins were struck EX S(enatus) C(onsulto) AD FRV (mentum) EMV(ndum). As a matter of fact, we know that the Senate (with the single exception of the stalwart Metellus Numi- dicus) took the oath to observe the terms of the new law. The obvious consequence seems to be that they must have instructed the quaestors to act in accordance with the law, and procure the necessary corn. The coins must therefore have been struck in order to enable the quaestors to carry out the provisions, not of some Senatus Consultum of which we have no other record, but of the lex frumentaria of Saturninus, 80 PL. X HISTORICAL EOMAN COINS The phrase EX S C on the coins refers to the order of the Senate for their issue, not to the order for the purchase of corn; i.e., it is to be construed not with emundum, but with words meaning "coin struck" understood. 1 The head of the harvest god Saturn, with the sickle, 2 shown on the obverse, and the ears of corn on the reverse, are obviously appropriate to the occasion. But the primary reason for the use of the obverse type was that the aerarium populi Romani which, subject to the sanction of the Senate, provided the urban quaestors with the funds for this expenditure, was situated in the Temple of Saturn below the Capitol. The trident is a mark to distinguish this particular issue from others, which have an arrow, a bow, etc. Such distinguishing marks do not occur before this date. The substitution for Eoma of another deity, on the obverse, is also an innovation. Caepio's colleague appears to be L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, son of the consul of 112, and father of Cicero's enemy, the consul of 58. 1 Did it refer to the decree for the purchase of the corn, as some suppose (Mommsen-Blacas ii., p. 168), the order of the words should be AD EKV.EX. S.C. EMV. 3 The form of the sickle is interesting, inasmuch as it corresponds to the toothed form described by Hesiod (Theog. 115: /cap^apoScov) ; whereas ordinarily the attribute of the god resembles the harpa of Perseus. See Daremberg and Saglio, Diet. Ant. ii., p. 971. H.K.C. G 81 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS THE SOCIAL WAR. 90 B.C. (46. Obv. Head of Magna Mater i\, wearing turreted crown and veil ; behind, EXAPV. Rev. Yictory in a two-horse chariot r. ; before the horses, a bird ; under them, C*, and C'FABT CF- in exergue. Silver denarius. 4*01 grammes (61*9 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 223, No. 1596. (47. Obv. Head of Eoma r., helmeted ; behind, PV ; all in laurel wreath. Rev. Victory in a two-horse chariot r. ; inscr., MLVCILI.RVF. Silver denarius (edge serrated). 3*95 grammes (61*0 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 224, No. 1613. It is probable that, in the earlier period of the Eoman coinage, all new issues in Eome only took place in accordance with a special decree of the Senate. But after the constitution of the monetary magistracy of the tresviri aere argento auro flando feriundO) and even before this had become a regular magistracy, rather than a commission appointed from time to time as necessity demanded, no such special decree of the Senate was needed, the issues being made by the moneyers in virtue of their office. The definitive constitution of the magistracy is placed by Mommsen 1 between 104 and 89 b.c. It is just about 1 Mommsen-Blacas, ii., pp. 47 f. 82 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS this time that formulas like EX S.C., S.C., AEG(ento) PVB(lico), EX A(rgento) P(ublico), PV(blice), etc., occur most frequently. 1 These phrases indicate special issues which were made in accordance with special decrees either of the Senate or of the people, and not by the tresviri in ordinary course. But what exactly is meant by saying that the coins were issued ex argento publico ? Naturally, the bullion from which all coins were issued by the State must have been public property. We are, it seems, compelled to assume that a reserve of silver in bars 2 was kept in the public treasury (which continued to be known as the aerarium populi Romani long after bronze ceased to be stored there) ; 3 that this reserve was known especially as the argentum 'publicum ; and that when in an emergency this reserve had to be converted into coin the source of the metal was indicated in the manner described. The coins Nos. 46, 47, are dated by external evidence (as of hoards in which they occur) to about 90 B.C., and there can be no doubt that the special circumstances which occasioned the issue of which 1 For more exact dates, see Mommsen-Blacas, ii., pp. 168, 169. * Pliny (N. H t xxiiii. 3. 55) quoting an inventory of the treasury in . . . B.C., gives the amounts of gold and silver, and of silver cash (numeratum) separately. He also quotes an inventory of the beginning of the Social War, but the text is injured. It is possible that the occurrence on the coins of the phrase we are discussing, and Pliny's record of an inventory made about the time these coins were struck, are to be connected, and point to some special measures then taken with regard to the treasury (cp. Mommsen-Blacas, ii. p. 407 note). 3 Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 72. 02 83 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS they formed part are to be looked for in the Social "War. The denarii of C. Fabius fall into two groups, both having the same types. In one group, which is without the inscription EX A. PV., the various series are distinguished by Greek letters on the obverse ; in the other, which has the inscription just mentioned, the distinguishing letters are Latin, and are placed on the reverse. We may infer that the former group was struck first, and the latter only when it became necessary to encroach on the reserve. Nothing is known of the moneyers C. Fabius and M. Lucilius Rufus. The bird on the reverse of C. Fabius's denarii has been described as a buteo, because that word was used as a cognomen by some members of the Fabia gens ; but the buteo was prob- ably a bird of prey, whereas the creature shown on the coins resembles an ibis or some other long-legged bird. The choice of the Magna Mater for representation on the obverse has probably no historical reason, and we may assume that Fabius selected it on private grounds. The serrated edge seen on the coin of Lucilius 1 is a feature which occurs on Roman silver coins exception- ally in the second century B.C., and commonly from 92 to 70 B.C. The Romans were preceded in this fashion in the years about 200 B.C. by the Carthaginians, by Antiochus III. of Syria, and by Philip V. of Macedon ; 1 The notches are not bo clearly marked as usual on the specimen illustrated. 84 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS the last two use the fashion on bronze coins, the Carthaginians on gold and silver. No explanation of the practice presenting the slightest degree of probability has yet been offered. 1 the social war. 90—81 b.c. (.48. Obv. Head of Italia r., helmeted; behind, a wreath; below, [*] ITALIA. Rev. The Dioscuri on horseback ; in exergue, in Oscan letters, retrograde, c ■ paapi * c * Silver denarius. 4*11 grammes (63*5 grains). British Museum. ( 49. Obv. Head of a Bacchante r., wreathed with ivy; in front, in Oscan letters, retrograde, mutil • embratur. Rev. Bull goring wolf ; in exergue, in Oscan letters, retrograde, c * paapi. .—Silver denarius. 3'82 grammes (59"0 grains). British Museum. (50. Obv. Female head r., laureate; behind, ITALIA. Rev. Young man kneeling, holding a pig, which eight warriors touch with the points of their swords; in the background, a standard upright, in exergue, Q..SILO- Silver denarius. Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris. (51.) Obv. Head of a Bacchante r., wearing ivy wreath. 1 See the various theories in B.M.C., I., p. 159. 85 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS Rev. Cista mystica, with thyrsos, to which a fillet is attached, leaning against it ; on the cista, a fawn skin ; in the exergue, in Oscan letters, retrograde, mi • ieiis • mi. Aureus, 8*47 grammes (130*7 grains). Bibliotheque Nationals, l*is. \52. Obv. Helmeted female head (Italia), crowned with wreath by a small figure of Victory from behind. Rev. Two warriors clasping hands ; on the right, prow of a galley, on which are a standard, spears and shields ; in exergue, y\. Silver denarius. Berlin Museum. These five coins, of which three are unique specimens at Paris or Berlin, are selected , from the numerous varieties issued by the Allies during the Social War. The names of both the Marsian Q. Pompaedius Silo and the Samnite C. Papius Mutilus appear. The latter describes himself as u Caius Papius, son of Caius, Mutilus, Imperator." The gold coin is issued by Minius Ieius (Iegius ?), son of Minius. There was no more effective expression of the Allies' defiance of Eoman authority than the issue of a coin in gold. The weight of the piece is that of an Attic stater. Now just about this time Mithradates, with whom the Allies were in communication, was issuing gold coins on the same standard, in defiance of the Eomans, at Pergamum, Athens, and Ephesus. 86 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS The types chosen by the Allies are also significant. Thus Italia — not the country, but the city of Corfinium, which was thus named during the war as destined to be the new capital — is represented, either by a laureate female head, or by a helmeted head copied directly from the Roma on Eoman denarii. The much-desired defeat of Eome by the Allies is sym- bolized by the Italic bull goring the Eoman wolf. The alliance with Mithradates is alluded to by the type of two warriors joining hands. One of them wears a diadem, while the prow of a ship — indicating the fleet with which Mithradates was to descend upon Italy — is seen beside them ; on the obverse of this coin, the helmeted bust of Italia is crowned by Yictory with a wreath. 1 The scene of the warriors taking an oath over the body of a pig has been explained as an allusion to the treaty of the Caudine Forks. It is more probable that it represents merely the oath taken by the Allies to be faithful to each other against Eome. A similar ceremony (with only two warriors) is shown, as we 1 Cavedoni and Lenormant (La Monn. dans VAntiquite, ii., pp. 296 f) consider that this piece was struck by the remnant of the revolted Allies to celebrate the disembarkation of Marius on his return from Africa, when the democratic party in Eome had made common cause with the Allies. The type would appear to have been copied by Sulla to celebrate his disembarkation at Brundusium in 83 B.C. after conquering Mithradates ; but one would like to be sure of the authen- ticity of the Sullan coin, which was published in the eighteenth century, and of which no specimen is now known to exist. 87 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS have seen, on the earliest Eoman gold coinage (No. 11). It is also fonnd on the denarii struck by Tiberius Veturius in 92 B.C. There, because T. Yeturius Calvinus was one of the two consuls who concluded the treaty of the Caudine Forks, the type has been regarded as alluding to that disgraceful event. If so, it would be unique among the memorial types found on Eoman coins ; and it is surely singularly perverse to accept such an interpretation when the type may equally well refer to the treaty (also concluded by T. Veturius) giving the Campanians and Samnites the rights of citizenship in 334 B.C. It seems more reasonable, therefore, to regard none of these treaty types as alluding to the Caudine Forks ; although, if any of them do so allude, it is the one placed by the Allies on their coins, rather than either of the others. The significance of the Dionysiac types is obscure. But they may have been partly inspired by the fact that Mithradates posed as the "New Dionysos," the liberator ; on his own coins he uses an ivy wreath as a border. The coins with the names of Papius Mutilus and Pompaedius Silo were probably, as Mommsen points out, struck early in the war; for Mutilus seems to have disappeared from the scene after he was defeated by Sulla in 89 B.C., although he lived some time longer. Silo died in 88 B.C. "The greater number 88 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS of these coins, and especially those which bear the legend Italia or Viteliu, must have been struck during the first years of the Social "War, when the insurgents still hoped to found a capital which would rival Eome. On the other hand, the rarer coins, bearing the names of Sabine or Samnite chiefs, are of later date, and were struck when Samnium continued to bear alone the burden of the war, and was fighting simply for her own independence. nl THE LEX PAPIRIA DE ASSE SEMtJNCIALI. 89 B.C. 53. Obv. Head of Apollo r., laureate ; behind, PISO- Rev. Eiderless horse galloping r. ; below, FRVGI ; above, E.L.P. Silver sestertius. 0*95 grammes (14*7 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 280, No. 2177. 54. Obv. Head of Minerva r., helmeted; [behind, • • • «J Rev. Prow r. ; above, L.P.D-A.P- Bronze triens. 4*41 grammes (68'0 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 282, No. 2192. By the Lex Papiria (generally but without good reason called the Lex Plautia Papiria), says Pliny, 2 semunciarii asses faeti; the weight of the as was reduced to half an ounce (normally 13*64 grammes or 1 Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 424, note. 3 N. H. sxxiii. 3. 46. 89 HISTORICAL BOMAN COINS 210-5 grains). The author of the law was C. Papirius Carbo, tribune of the people in 89 B.C., who, along with M. Plautius Silvanus, carried the famous Lex Plautia Papiria extending the citizenship. This was probably passed quite early in 89 B.C., if not at the close of 90 B.C. ;* the law with which we are con- cerned was intimately connected with the policy of extending the franchise, and therefore was also doubt- less passed early in the tribunate of Papirius. In a considerable number of cities in Italy, long before the passing of this law, bronze struck on the semuncial standard was in use : e.g., in Calabria, at Brundu- sium, Orra, and Uxentum ; in Lucania, at Copia ; in Bruttium, at Vibo Valentia and Petelia. Bronze had by this time already become a mere token coinage. The money of the cities which were now incorporated in the Eoman state, and which therefore lost their right of coinage, might have been called in, or tariffed at some arbitrary rate ; but what Papirius did was to reduce the legal weight of the Boman as to the weight prevailing elsewhere. 2 Very soon afterwards 3 even the Boman mint was closed for bronze, and Italy — once the home of the bronze standard — presents the curious 4 1 Mommsen, Bom. Hist. Yol. iii., p. 247, note. 2 Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 73, note. 3 About 80 B.C. 1 Curious, that is to say, at so late a date in history ; for previous to the fourth century B.C. little bronze was coined in the ancient world. 90 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS spectacle of a country without a bronze coinage, for the few coins which Paestum was for some reason allowed to issue can have made little impression on the currency. The letters E L P on the sesterce No. 53 have been rightly expanded by Borghesi into E Lege Papiria ; and the letters LP DA P explained by Mommsen 1 as Lege Papiria de aere publico, by Graebler 2 as Lege Papiria de assis pondere. Of these explanations, Mommsen' s is more strongly supported by the analogy of other inscriptions. The sesterce was issued only twice, the quinarius only four times, in the forty \ years following the Papirian reform, so that the Eoman coinage thence- forward consisted of little but denarii. L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi himself was responsible, about 88 B.C., for an enormous series of denarii, probably the largest ever put out by any one morieyer during the Eepublic. 3 During the short period 49 — i4 B.C., small silver was once more issued in some quantities. But how the Romans and Italians can have been content for some 65 years (the bronze coinage was resumed in 15 B.C.) to dispense with the use of bronze, it is puzzling to conceive. L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi is Cicero's friend. It 1 Mommsen-Blacas, ii., p. 420, note. 2 Zeit.f. Num. 1902, p. 174, note. 8 The British Museum contains over 270 varieties. 91 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS was probably he who, after the end of the Social War, carried the law embodying two new tribes, and who was praetor with Yerres in 74 b.c. The Apollo and the horse on his coins refer to the races celebrated at the Ludi Apollinares. These were inaugurated in 212 B.C., and the annual celebration was established next year by Piso's ancestor, C. Calpurnius Piso, praetor urbanus. SULLA IN GREECE. 87—84 B.C. 55. Obv. Head of Yenus r. ; before it, Cupid standing, holding palm branch ; below, LSVLLA* Rev. Sacrificial ewer and lituus between two trophies; above and below, IMPER ITERVM Aureus. 10*72 grammes (165'4 grains). British Museum. This aureus is one of the earliest specimens of that gold coinage, issued by generals in virtue of their imperium, which eventually developed into the gold coinage of the Empire. Gold issues of this kind were at the time quite outside the province of the ordinary Roman civil moneyer. Apart from that fact, the fabric of the coin proves that it was not produced by the mint at Eome. There is general agreement among numismatists that it should be assigned to the period of Sulla's campaign against Mithradates. During this campaign his quaestor Lucullus issued^ 92 HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS money in Peloponnesus : At' heCvov Ikotty] to -nkticrrov h Tl€\07TOVV7j(T No. 3878. Aretas III., king of the Nabathaeans, interfered more than once in the affairs of Syria and Judaea. 1 Mommsen suggests that in this case it is Sextus Pompeius (first cousin once removed of the triumvir), who was born about 95 B.C. 98 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS He ruled for a time in Damascus ; defeated the Jewish king Alexander Jannaeus at Addida, and besieged king Aristobulus in Jerusalem (65 B.C.). M. Aemilius M. f. M. n. Scaurus, sent against him by Pompeius, frightened him away ; but although during his retreat he was defeated by Aristobulus, he was far from crushed, and continued to give trouble. Pompeius, unable to take the field himself, sent Scaurus once more, and in 62 B.C. Aretas made peace, obtaining good terms. That did not prevent Scaurus from representing the king as a suppliant, who has dis- mounted from his camel and kneels, proffering an olive-branch. This is the earliest instance of a Eoman moneyer commemorating on his coins his own exploits. The piece before us belongs to an issue made specially (ex Senatus consulto) on the occasion of the aedilician games celebrated by Scaurus in 58 B.C. These games were notorious for their insane extrava- gance: 150 panthers, five crocodiles, the bones (forty feet long) of the very monster to which Andromeda was said to have been exposed at Joppa in Judaea, were amongst the attractions which he provided 1 and which helped to ruin his fortunes and the morality of the populace. 2 His colleague in the aedileship was P. Plautius Hypsaeus, who had also been in the i Pliny N. H. viii. 64 ; 96 ; ix. 11. 2 Pliny N. H. xxxvi. 113. h2 99 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS service of Pompeius as quaestor. The scorpion may indeed refer to some exploit performed by Hypsaeus in the province of Commagene, of which it is the emblem. 1 The significance of the type of Jupiter fulminating is obscure ; for the suggestion that the god is meant, as Zeis v-tyiGTos, to refer to the name of the moneyer, is not very attractive. After all, the type was an old one. But the legend appears to connect it definitely in some way with the capture of Privernum by the moneyer* s ancestor, the consul C. Plautius. 2 This feat marked the final subjection of the Volscians in 329 B.C. 3 Probably 4 the type refers to the consul's triumph after his Yolscian campaign ; for it must be remembered that in a triumph the victorious general appeared in the character and guise of Jupiter. The form CAPTV (for captum) is less probably an instance of anousvara — i.e., the suppression of M in writing — than an abbreviation caused by lack of space. caesar in rome. 49 b.c. 58. Obv. Female head r., wearing wreath of oak- leaves, and jewellery; behind ±11. 1 But it occurs only on one of the two (or three) series of coins struck by Hypsaeus, so that it is more probably a differentiating mark of some kind. 2 His cognomen seems to have been Decianus, not Hypsaeus as the coin gives it. 8 Liv. viii. 20. 1 As Mom m sen (ii., p. 491 note) seems to imply. 100 HISTOKICAL ROMAN COINS Rev. Trophy of Gaulish arms (tunic, horned helmet, shield and karnyx) ; on r., an axe adorned with an animal's head ; across field, CAE SAR. Aureus, 8*50 grammes (131*2 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 505, No. 3954. 59. Obv. Similar to preceding. Rev. Similar trophy ; at its foot, figure of a prisoner, seated, with hands tied behind him ; across field, CAE SAR. Silver denarius. 3*37 grammes (52 grains). B.M.C. I., p. 506, No. 3959. 60. Obv. Head of Apollo, r., hair confined by fillet; below, star ; around, Q SICIN IVS IIIVIR. Rev. Club and lion-skin between bow and arrow ; around, CCOPON[IVS] PRSC- Silver denarius, 3*99 grammes (61*6 grains). British Museum. When Caesar entered Rome in 49, he naturally seized the state treasure in the temple of Saturn, and converted it into coin for the payment of his troops. The gold and silver coins, Nos. 58 and 59, form part of this issue, which is remarkable in many ways. Eoman commanders had previously issued a military coinage distinct from the regular urban coinage ; thus Lucullus, acting as quaestor for Sulla in the Mithra- datic war, had struck gold pieces in his commander's name (see No. 55). But here we have the general 101 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS striking a military coinage in Eome itself, "while the only approach to a regular urban coinage was being struck outside Eome ! Thus there are denarii (No. 60) issued in this year for the praetor C. Coponius, who was in command of the fleet at Ehodes, by the monetary triumvir Q. Sicinius. Con- stitutionally Q. Sicinius, as home magistrate, had no right to issue a military coinage ; he placed himself within his rights by adding the letters S.C. The inverted position of affairs, caused by Caesar's occupa- tion of the capital, could not be better illustrated. But Caesar's coinage, irregular as it seems, was none the less the foundation of the imperial gold coinage, which is, strictly speaking, an imperatorial coinage issued from the Eoman mint. The goddess represented on the obverse of Caesar's coins is generally identified with Pietas, because this name is inscribed against a somewhat similar head on a contemporary coin of Decimus Brutus. But the head on Brutus's coin has no oak-wreath, an attribute which must surely be significant. The amount of jewellery which the goddess wears (ear- ring, necklace, and pearls — apparently — on the knot in which her hair is tied behind) suggests that Eckhel 1 was right in calling her Venus, who would obviously be appropriate as the divine ancestress of the Julian family. But there appears to be no evidence that 1 Doctrina Num. Vet. vi. p. 6. 102 PL. XI Nos. 46 — 60. HISTORICAL EOMAN COINS Venus was ever represented with the oak-wreath. The identification must, therefore, for the present be regarded as uncertain. The numerals ±11 (52) 1 have been explained as an indication of Caesar's age. This is not so absurd as it may at first sight seem. The legates of M. Antonius, on coins struck in Gaul in 42 and 41 B.C., indicated the triumvir's age (see Kos. 76, 77). Caesar was probably born in 102 B.C., not in 100, as is generally supposed. 2 Thus in the year 49 he would have com- pleted his fifty-second year. The reason for stating his age would be to remind the Eomans that in the next year he would constitutionally be entitled to hold the consulship for the second time, (If the coins were distributed on Caesar's birthday the mention of his age would have additional significance.) No man, by the lex annalis, could hold the consulship before he had entered on his forty-third year. An interval of eleven years was required between two consulships. Caesar, now in his fifty-third year, would in 48 B.C. be once more eligible. The trophy, on the other hand, served to recall Caesar's exploits in Gaul, the shaggy- headed prisoner represented on the reverse of the denarius being probably no other than Yercingetorix. 3 1 For so they must be interpreted, rather than as the letters 1 1"|". 2 See the note in Mommsen's History of Rome, bk. v., chap. i. B See Babelon, Rev. Num. 1902, pp. 1 ff. On coins of Hostilius Saserna, struck about 48 B.C., we have the heads of Vercingetorix and of the oak- wreathed goddess described above. 103 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS The shield, helmet, and war-trumpet are typically Gaulish ; but it may be doubted whether the axe is not a form of sacrificial axe rather than a barbarian weapon. An axe decorated with a lion's head is represented among the sacrificial implements on denarii of P. Sulpicius Galba issued about 69 B.C. ; 1 and an actual bronze axe with a bull's head was in the Forman Collection. 2 In the present case, a wolf's head seems to have been employed as ornament. These a^m and denarii of Caesar are alike extremely rare. The aurei were struck at 38 to the Eoman pound of 327'45 grammes, evidently with the object of approximating as closely as possible to one of the many forms of the " gold-shekel M standard which had been almost universal in the Eastern Mediterranean from time immemorial. Soon afterwards the standard was lowered to 40 to the pound, or 8*18 grammes. As the gold coins continued to be worth the same number of denarii (25), the older, heavier ones were probably melted down. This would account for their rarity, but hardly for the rarity of the denarii. THE SENATORIAL PARTY IN THE PROVINCES. 49 B.C. 61 . Obv. Young male head r., hair confined with fillet ; around, L LENT-CMARCCOS (NT and MA ligatured). 1 G-rueber, B. M. C. i., p. 433, Nos. 3516 f. 2 C, Smith, Catal. of the Forman Collection, No. 160. 104 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS Rev. Jupiter standing, holding eagle and thunder- bolt ; at his feet, altar ; in field 1., star and Q. Silver denarius. 3'75 grammes (57"8 grains). British Museum. 62. Oiv. Winged Gorgon's head in the middle of the three-legged symbol (triskeles) of Sicily ; between the legs, ears of barley. Rev. Jupiter standing, holding eagle and thunder- bolt ; in field r., pruning-hook ; on r. and 1. : LENT.MAR.COS (NT and MAR ligatured). Silver denarius. 4*12 grammes (63*6 grains). British Museum. L. Lentulus Crus and C. Claudius Marcellus were chosen consuls for the year 49 B.C. Both, more espe- cially Lentulus, were declared enemies of Caesar, and fled hastily at his approach to Eome. Early in March they were sent forward by Pompeius to Epirus. During the time of Caesar's Spanish expedition, Lentulus seems to have been occupied in raising troops in the East, but he returned in time for the fighting in Epirus. Of Marcellus we hardly hear again ; in 48 B.C. he was, with Coponius, in command of the Ehodian squadron. Of the two coins bearing the names of the consuls, the first was issued by a quaestor (hence the letter q on the reverse), either at the Pompeian head- quarters, Dyrrhachium, or else at Apollonia. The latter mint is perhaps the more probable, since in the 105 HISTOKICAL ROMAN COINS obverse type we may recognize Apollo, whose head is the regular type of the silver " denarii" of Apollonia in the first century B.C. The second coin, on the other hand, bears a symbol which definitely connects it with Sicily. For, whatever may have been the original meaning of the triskeles, 1 there is no doubt that, at the time when these coins were struck, it recalled the three-cornered island of Sicily to the Eomans as clearly as the same symbol recalls to us the Isle of Man. Now of any actual visit of the consuls to Sicily in their year of office we have no record ; and as our information with regard to their movements, from the time of their leaving Eome to their departure from Brundisium, is fairly detailed, we may well doubt whether they went to Sicily at all. But Pompeius was actively employed, until he left Italy, in raising men and money from every source. 2 It is improbable that he would have neglected Sicily, especially as it was held for the Senate by Marcus Cato, until the approach of Curio drove him to join Pompeius. We may therefore not unreasonably con- jecture that these coins were struck in the name of the consuls, in connexion with the levies of men, provisions, or money, which were being made on the island by the Senatorial party. The ears of barley 1 On this see an interesting note by J. Six in Sertum Nabericum (1908), where it is suggested that the triskeles is the symbol of thunder. 2 Cass. Dio. xli. 9.7. 106 HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS attached to the triskeles remind us that Sicily was one of the great sources of corn-supply. The figure of Jupiter is common to the two issues. It is of course possible that in the one case it has some local reference, while in the other it is merely retained without any particular significance. Thus, if the Sicilian issue is the earlier, as is probable, the figure may represent some statue of Zeus in Sicily. Furtwangler, 1 accordingly, approves Havercamp's con- jecture that it is meant for the Syracusan Zeus Eleutherios. Further, he maintains that these coins need not have been struck in or for Sicily at all, but that the Sicilian types are personal to the consul Marcellus, who was descended from the conqueror of the island. It seems however improbable that the types of both sides of the coin with the triskeles should refer to Marcellus, leaving Lentulus in the cold. A satisfactory explanation of the Jupiter type has still to be discovered. caesar's fourfold triumph. 46 b.c. 63. Obv. Veiled beardless head r. ; around, C-CAESAR COSTER. Rev. Lituus, ewer and axe; below, AHIRTIVS PR. Aureus. 8*07 grammes (124*6 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 525, No. 4050. 1 Masterpieces, p. 218. 107 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS The third consulship of Julius Caesar dates this coin to the year 46 b.c. It was struck by Caesar's lieutenant A. Hirtius, 1 the continuator of the a Gallic War/' who abbreviates the name of his magistracy thus : PR. Does this mean Praetor, or Praefectus whi ? The former is the more probable, since there is no certain instance of the abbreviation PR standing alone , without the qualifying dative or genitive VRB (i) or VRB(is), being used on a coin for praefectus. When, as in the coins of C. Clovius, the qualifying word is omitted, the abbreviation is PRAEF. 2 Histori- cally, the choice before us is an even one ; for we know that in or for the year with which we are con- cerned Caesar arranged for the appointment of six praefecti of the city and ten praetors. 3 Hirtius may have been either, and as either may have issued the coin in question. On the whole, the evidence, from a linguistic standpoint, favours the interpretation of the abbreviation as Praetor. An examination of a number of these coins shows that they are hastily and carelessly struck from, as a 1 On Hirtius, see Max L. Strack in Bonner Jahrbucher, Heft 118. 9 Whether Clovius is meant to be described as praefectus urbis or praefectus chassis (or even praefectus fabrum, as Munzer suggests, in Pauly-Wissowa s.n.) does not affect the argument. The coins of Q. Oppius call him PR, but there is nothing to prove that this means praefectus. Cestius and Norbanus, also called PR, were most probably praetors. 3 Cassius Dio, xlii. 51 and xliii. 28. 108 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS rule, rather roughly executed dies. There can be little doubt that this coinage — which, it must be remembered, was not the ordinary silver coinage of the triumvirs of the mint, but a special issue of gold — was intended to serve for the enormous largesses which Caesar squandered at his triumphs in 46 B.C. He gave, for instance, to each veteran foot-soldier, 20,000 sesterces, i.e. 200 such aurei; to each of the populace, in addition to a dole of corn and oil, 400 sesterces , i.e. 4 such aurei. 1 The enormous coinage which must have been required explains the rudeness with which the coins are executed, and their compara- tive plentifulness at the present time. The types do not seem to carry any allusion to the events of the year. The head on the obverse is generally described as Pietas — a name which is somewhat indiscriminately applied by numismatists to any veiled head of some- what feminine appearance. When we remember how common a religious rite was the veiling of the head, the doubtfulness of such an identification is apparent. Nevertheless here, where the type of the reverse alludes to Caesar's position as religious head of the state, it is quite reasonable to suppose that the obverse represents Pietas, or the sense of duty towards the gods, the outward sign of which, as we know from Lucretius's protest, 2 was the veiling 1 Suetonius, Divus Iulius, 38. 2 Bk. V. 1198. 109 HISTOKICAL ROMAN COINS of the head before the sacred images of the gods : — nee pietas ullast, velatum saepe videri vertier ad lapidem atque omnia accedere ad aras. corinth refounded. 44 b.c. 64. Obv. Head of Julius Caesar r., laureate; behind, LAVSIVLICORINT (INT ligatured). Rev. Bellerophon mounted on Pegasus r., striking downwards with spear ; above and below, [L-CERTO-AEFICIO C] IVLIO iTviR (AE ligatured). Bronze. 5'27 grammes (81*4 grains). B.M.O. Corinth, p. 58, No. 48V. 65. Obv. Bellerophon, wearing petasos and chlamys, walking r., leading Pegasus by the bridle, before an arched doorway. In exergue, CORINTHVM Rev. Poseidon seated r. on rock, r. hand resting on knee, 1. holding long trident upright ; on r. [PJTADICHILO, on L C IVLI- NICEPII-VIR. Bronze. 8*34 grammes (128*7 grains). B.M.C. Corinth, p. 58, No. 484. The recolonization of Corinth and Carthage was intended by Julius Caesar at the same time as an "atonement for two of the worst crimes committed 110 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS by the old Bepublic, and as a means not only of relieving the capital of the world of starving pro- letarians, but also of vigorously enforcing the Komani- zation of the subject provinces/' * Corinth began to rise from its ruins probably one hundred and two years after Mummius sacked it — i.e., in 44 B.C. ; whether actually before the murder of the dictator or not, it is difficult to say. For the fact that the foundation is definitely ascribed by many ancient writers to Caesar merely means that he made the necessary plans before his death. It has indeed been maintained that the real foundation was only effected by the triumvirs after the battle of Philippi. The numismatic evidence, on the whole, favours an earlier date. 3 For the duoviri L. Certus Aeficius and C. Iulius, who strike coins with the head of Julius Caesar, do not represent the heads of M. Antonius or Octavian, as they might be expected to do if their term of office had fallen after the campaign of Philippi. Further, the full title of the colony, Laus Iuli(a) Corint(hus), which, on the coins certainly of the time of Antonius, Augustus and the earlier emperors down to Domitian, is replaced by the form CORIIMT or CORINTHI, would be expected on the earliest coins. 1 Hertzberg, Ge&ch. Q-riechenlands, L, pp. 460 f. ; where also the varying views as to the date of the foundation are discussed. B On the chronology of the coins, see Earle !Fox, in Journal Inter- national d y Arckeologie Numismatique, ii. (1899), pp. 94 f. in HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS The coin of the duoviri P. Tadius Chilo and C. Iulius Niceporus, which is also for various reasons placed early in the series, bears the legend Corinthum. This use of the accusative is not paralleled elsewhere, and is difficult to explain. The types are local- The standing type of the coinage of Corinth from the earliest times was Pegasus. Bellerophon himself was less commonly represented. On one of our coins he is seen leading Pegasus — having evidently but just tamed him — towards the doorway of a building of some kind ; possibly this is meant to indicate the fountain-house of Peirene. On the other, we have part of the battle with the Chimaera — without the Chimaera. It is not certain whether the figure of Poseidon reproduces an actual statue. 1 The coins are signed by the duoviri iure dicundo, the highest officials of the colony, as eponymous magistrates. THE MURDER OF CAESAR. 44 B.C. 66. Obv. Head of Julius Caesar r., laureate, veiled; in front, CAESAR; behind, DICT. PERPETVO. 1 See Tmhoof-Blumer and Gardner, Nvmwm. Comm. on Pausania8 % pp. 16 f., for the various Poseidon statues at Corinth. 112 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS Rev. Yenus standing to 1. with sceptre (at foot of which is a shield) in her 1., and a Victory in her r. ; on r., PSEPVLLIVS; on L, MACER. Silver denarius. 3-85 grammes (59'4 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 549, No. 4173. 67. Obv. Head of M. Antonius r., bearded, veiled ; in front, lituus ; behind, one-handled jng. Circular countermark. Rev. Horseman riding at a gallop and leading a second horse to r. ; behind, wreath and palm-branch ; above, P SEPVLLIVS ; below, MACER. Silver denarius. 4*28 grammes (66*0 grains). B.M.C. L, p. 550, No. 4178. The exact date of these coins has been much discussed, though the choice of years lies only between 44 and 43 B.C. The second piece, showing the head of M. Antonius with the beard which he grew in sign of mourning, must obviously have been struck after the death of Caesar, March 15th, 44 B.C. The first, on which Caesar is called " Dictator perpetuo," must accordingly date after the beginning of 44 B.C. Another denarius of Macer represents the temple which the Senate proposed, shortly before the Dicta- tor's death, to erect to his clemency ;* Clementia and Caesar were represented joining hands, and this virtue 1 Plut. Caes. 57 ; App. I.e. ii. 106 ; Cass. Dio, xliv. 6. H.R.C. I 113 HISTOEICAL BOMAN COINS thus entered the ranks of the gods publicly worshipped at Eome. Although the temple is represented on the coin of Macer, it by no means follows that it was actually completed at the time. 1 There is thus no cogent reason for postponing the magistracy of Macer until 43 B.C. ; indeed, since Antonius left Eome at the end of November, 44, and was thenceforward active against the Senate, being in fact declared a public enemy after his defeat by Hirtius in April, 43, it is difficult to see how the Senate could have allowed a moneyer of the latter year to place the head of Antonius on the coins. 2 So far, Caesar's was the only portrait of a living person that had appeared on the Eoman coinage, and that in accordance with a special decree of the Senate. 3 The privilege would not have been repeated for Antonius during the period of strained relations with the Senate ; or for him alone, without Lepidus and Octavian, during the triumvirate. Again, when the triumvirate came into being, late in the year, Caesar had been dead for 1 Any more than the Tempio Malatestiano at Rimini was completed in the form represented on Matteo de' Pasti's medal of Sigismondo Malatesta, which was cast in 1450 to show the elevation planned by the architect Leone Battista AlbertL 2 See Grueber, B.M.C. i., p. 548. 3 Cassius Dio, xliv. 4. "What Dio say sis: Uaripa T€ avrov -rifc mrpi&os c7r - fe - "H -a ,'■'" ^ - X X ' Nos. 75 x HISTOEICAL ROMAN COINS 88. Obv. Head of Augustus r; around, CAESAR AVGVSTVS. Rev. Mars, nude but for a slight cloak fastened round his waist, helmeted, walking to 1., looking back ; he holds in his right a legionary eagle, in his left the standard of a maniple ; inscription on 1. SIGN IS, on r. RECEPTIS. Silver denarius. 4*36 grammes (67*3 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 26, No. 4405. 89. Obv. Head of Augustus r. ; around, S PQR IMP CAESARI AVG COS XI TR POT VI. Rev. Triumphal arch with three openings ; above, Augustus in quadriga to front, between a Parthian (on 1.), offering a manipular standard, and another (on r.), offering a legionary eagle and holding in his 1. a bow; around, CIVIBETSIGN MIl-ITAPARTRECVP\ Aureus. 7*81 grammes (120*5 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 37, No. 4453. 90. Obv. Head of Augustus 1. ; around, CAESAR AVGVSTVS. Rev. Circular domed temple ; within, Mars to 1., holding a legionary eagle and a manipular standard ; across the field, MAR VLT- Silver denarius. 3*89 grammes (60-0 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 28, No. 4411. The stroke of diplomacy by which in 20 B.C. 139 HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS Augustus induced Phraates to return the standards which the Parthians had on three different occasions captured from Eoman armies was one of the achieve- ments of which he was most proud. u Signa militaria complur[a per] alios d[u]ces ami[ssa] devicti[s hostibus reciperavi] ex Hispania et [Gallia et a Dalmjateis. Parthos trium exercitum Eoman[o]rum spolia et signa re[ddere] mihi supplicesque amicitiam populi Eomani petere coegi. ea autem si[gn]a in penetrali, quod e[s]t in templo Martis TJltoris, reposui." 1 The standards recovered from the Dalmatians (in 33 b.c.) were those which had been lost in 48 by Gabinius and in 44 by Vatinius. Of those recovered from Spaniards and Gauls we know no more than Augustus tells us. The three armies defeated by the Parthians were those commanded by Crassus (in 53), and by the legates of M. Antonius, — L. Decidius Saxa in 40, and Oppius Statianus in 36. The Parthians, threatened by Augustus with war, handed over to Tiberius the standards which they had retained, as well as some prisoners. 2 Augustus celebrated their recovery with great pomp ; among other things, he erected the triumphal arch which is represented on the aureus No. 89. The standards themselves were placed in the temple of Mars the Avenger. By this, in the passage 1 Mm. Anc, c. 29. Cp. Cassius Dio (liv. 8) : typovei /xeya, Acywv cm to. irporepov 7rore £v rats /m^ais d-jroXop.eva olkovitl ckcko/*1(Tto. 2 Sueton. Divus Aug. 21; Tib. 9; Cass. Dio, liv. 8. 140 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS quoted from the Will of Augustus, is undoubtedly meant the Temple in the Forum of Augustus. But as that was not finished until the year 2 B.C., the standards must have been placed elsewhere in the meantime. A small shrine of the god was erected on the Capitol in 20 B.C., and it is definitely stated by Cassius Dio 1 that it was meant for the reception of the standards. Both Horace and Propertius, however, seem to imply that they were dedicated to Jupiter : Tua, Caesar, aetas . . . signa nostro restituit Iovi derepta Parthorum superbis postibus. (Hor. Carm. iv. 16. 6.) Adsuescent Latio Partha tropaea Iovi. (Prop, iii (iv.) 4. 6.) It is accordingly tempting to assume that they found a temporary resting-place in the Temple of Jupiter on the Capitol. But, on the other hand, we have the definite assertion of Dio just cited. At first sight it would appear that the passages of Horace and Propertius cannot be regarded as good evidence against the statement of the historian. But they are not really contradictory. The historian only says that Augustus decreed the erection of a temple on this occasion ; but the standards must have been kept somewhere pending its completion. Has the temple of Jupiter Feretrius more claim to consideration as the 1 LIV. 8. 141 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS temporary resting-place of the standards than the small shrine of Mars Ultor on the Capitol ? Let us examine the coins. Of the few coins chosen here, out of the many which commemorate this achievement, the first (No. 87) was struck in the East, possibly at Pergamum. 1 The second (No. 88), on the other hand, is of Eoman fabric. The war-god carries a legionary eagle in one hand, a mani- pular standard in the other. Both kinds of standards are, of course, included in the general term signum. This coin was probably struck on the return of Augustus to Eome in 19 b.c. These pieces do not assist us to decide the question of the temples. But on No. 90 (also struck in Eome at the same time as No. 88), we see a circular-domed temple of Mars Ultor. Now Borghesi 3 and Mommsen 3 regard this type as an anticipatory representation of the greater temple eventually dedicated in the Forum of Augustus. There is, of course, nothing improbable in the sug- gestion that the type should thus anticipate the completion of the temple which had been vowed during the campaign of Philippi. 4 But one thing is very clear from the remains of the temple itself, and that is that it was not circular, but an octastyle 1 E. Grabrici, Numism. di Augusto in Milani's Studi e Materiali, ii. 2 (Euvres, ii., p. 379. 3 Res gest. div. Aug. p. 126. * See supra, p. 114. n. 1. 142 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS peripteros. 1 Obviously then, either the representation, if it is meant for the temple in the Forum of Augustus, is quite imaginary, or else the original plans were completely altered when it came to building. But neither alternative is so reasonable as the supposition that in the temple on the coins of 19 B.C. we have the shrine which Augustus built on the Capitol, hard by the temple of Jupiter Feretrius, as a temporary resting- place to receive the standards until they should be transferred to a more permanent abode. 2 This being so, the references by Horace and Propertius to Jupiter must be taken in a general sense, as indicating merely that the standards were placed on the Capitol, which was especially associated with Jupiter. THE PROVINCE OF ASIA. 19 B.C. 91. Obv. Head of Augustus r. ; below, IMP IXTR rov. Rev. Fa9ade of a hexastyle temple, inscribed on architrave ROMETAVGVST; across field, COM ASIAE. Silver et cistophoric medallion." 11*92 grammes (184 grains). British Museum. The date of this piece is fixed, by the titles given to Augustus on the obverse, to 19 B.C. The coin 1 See, for instance, the plan in Lanoiani, Ruins and Excavations , p. 305. 2 So Eichter in Baumeister's Denkmciler, iii. p. 1480 ; A. Schneider, das alte Rom, PI. yiti. 12. 143 HISTOLICAL KOMAN COINS itself is one of a class 1 which corresponded in weight and purpose to the cistophori which had long been the chief silver currency of the province of Asia. 2 The old cistophoric types gradually disappeared ; thus on a piece issued in the name of M. Antonius, about 39 — 38 B.C., the ivy-wreath, snakes and cista mystica still remain, but on the obverse we have the head of M. Antonius in the wreath, while the cista is trans- ferred to the reverse, where with the head of Octavia it occupies the place of the old bow-case. On a piece of Octavian, struck in 28 B.C., the only relic of the old types is the cista, used as an adjunct in the field of the reverse. Although it was no new thing for the different cities of a province to send representatives to a common assembly for some definite purpose, Augustus is rightly credited with having first organized the Kolvov 'Ao-tas (commune Asiae) in the form which it was to maintain for nearly three centuries. The assembly met periodically, and its object was above all to celebrate the joint cult of Home and Augustus. Once their religious functions had been fulfilled, the members could proceed to deliberate on matters of politics interesting the province. In the province of Asia there was one supreme high priest of this cult, 1 On which see E. Gabrici, Numism, di Augmto, in Milani's Studi e Materialif ii. 2 Hut. Or. Coins, p. 138 f. 144 HISTORICAL EOMAN COINS known simply as apx^pevs 'Ao-iW In addition, how- ever, there were a certain number of apx*- € P& 'A 700 „1- Silver to brass ?> 28 ,,!• „ copper 5? 56 »1- Brass to „ JJ 2 »1. HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS In the case of the relations of the nobler to the baser metals, this could hardly have represented intrinsic value ; probably the sestertii and smaller denominations were minted at something like double their actual value. 1 One element of the reform of Augustus was of brief duration. The privilege which the moneyers enjoyed of placing their names on the coins was withdrawn after 3 B.C. We do not know why it was taken away, any more than we know why it was granted in the first place. It was possibly a con- cession to republican feeling. Although the types and legends usually have direct reference to Augustus, we have on some coins types which recall the good old days when moneyers commemorated their family history. Thus L. Aquillius Floras represents his ancestor M' Aquillius supporting Sicily, a fainting woman ; another type is the three-legged symbol of Sicily. Both refer to the suppression by M' Aquillius of the slave revolt in 100 B.C. Allusions of this kind, however, are excluded from the brass and copper coinage. One may regard them as concessions made by Augustus to the moneyers working under his direct control. 2 1 On this whole question see Mommsen-Blacas, iii. pp. 42 — 48. 9 Moneyers who issued gold or silver in this period very rarely issued brass or copper, and vice versa. The only exceptions are M. Sanquinius and P. Licinius Stolo. It is possible, therefore, that the triumvirs were divided into two classes, one imperial, the other senatorial. 157 HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS THE ALTAR OF LYON. 10 B.C. 101. Olv. Head of Augustus r., laureate; around, CAESAR PONT MAX. Rev. Altar, surmounted by eight objects of uncertain significance, and decorated in front with a wreath, between two small figures (?) holding laurel branches ; on either side, on a column, a Yictory holding a wreath and a palm branch ; in exergue, ROMETAVG. Bronze. 11*02 grammes (170 grains). British. Museum. 102. Olv. Head of Augustus 1., laureate ; behind, caduceus. Rev. Similar to No. 101. Bronze. 4*40 grammes (67-9 grains). Cabinet des Me'dailles, Biblioth^que Nationale, Paris. 103. Olv. Head of Augustus r., laureate ; around, CAESAR AVGVSTVS DIVI F- PATER PATRIAE. Rev. Similar to preceding. Brass. 24*76 grammes (382*2 grains). British Museum. The great altar of Lyon was inaugurated by the Gaulish chiefs, in honour of Eoma and Augustus, on 1st Aug., 10 B.C. 1 It is well kuown that Augustus allowed no cultus of himself alone, apart from Eoma ; 1 See Toutain, in Bee, des Mem. de la Soc. Nat. des Ant. de France, Centenaire, 1904, pp. 455 — 459, where the date 12 B.C. is disposed of. 158 HISTOEICAL ROMAN COINS accordingly this altar, the focus of Eomanism in Gaul, was always known as the ara Eomae et Augusti. It was associated with the concilium of the Tres Galliae, sometimes called the conventus arensis. The concilium was the earliest assembly of the kind (corresponding to the Greek koivo) to he founded in the "West. It was attended at first by representatives of 60, after- wards of 64 Gaulish civitates} The provincial priest, who presided over the concilium, held the title sacerdos Bomae et Augusti ad confluentes Araris etRhodani; and his most important function was the conduct of the festival which took place on 1st Aug., consisting of a grand procession, prayers and sacrifice for Roma and the Emperor, a banquet and athletic contests. There can be no doubt that the erection represented on the coins Nos. 101 — 103 is meant for the altar, although an attempt has been made to disprove the current interpretation. 2 The wreath (corona civica) between the laurel branches conveys an obvious allusion to Augustus (see No. 85) ; the same decora- tion is found on the altar of the Genius Augusti at Pompeii. 3 No satisfactory explanation has, however, 1 On the numbers, see Ferrero, Qrandezza e Decadenza di Boma, v. p. 71. On the organization of the Tres Galliae the latest writer is Hirschfeld in Etta, 1908. 2 Willers in Numiam, Zeitsclir. xxxiv. (1902) maintains that it is the ovarium of the circus at Lugdunum ; see the reply to his article in Rev. Numism, 1904, pp. 46 ff. by Poncet and Morel, and in Bonner Jahrbucher, 111, 112, pp. 442 f. by Max L. Strack. 8 Oyerbeck-Mau, Pompeii, 118 f. 159 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS been found for the two objects (if they are not meant for small figures) flanking the laurel branches, or for the objects on the top of the altar. In addition to the series of coins (such as No. 101) issued at the time of the inauguration of the altar, there is a second series (to which No. 103 belongs) issued after Augustus had received the title Pater Patriae, i.e., after 3 B.C. Finally, there exists a small bronze coin (No. 102) having the altar on the reverse, and a laureate head of Augustus on the obverse, with a caduceus behind it. 1 It has recently been main- tained that the festival of the three Gauls was celebrated at Lugdunum on 1st Aug., because that was the date of the festival of the Gaulish Mercurius, and Augustus had been received into the Gaulish Pantheon in the character of that god. The coin seems to give some confirmation to this view. 2 THE DEATH OP NERO DRT7SUS. 9 B.C. 104. Obv. Head of Nero Drusus 1., wearing oak wreath ; around, NERO CLAVDIVS DRVSVS GERMANICVS IMP. 1 Unfortunately much worn, so as hardly to repay reproduction. 2 See R. Mowat, Procea-verbaux de la Soc. Nat. des Ant. de France, 20 Avr. 1904 ; the theory of Augustus and the G-aulish Mercurius is Otto Hirschfeld's (Bee. des MSm. de la Soc. Nat. des Ant. de France Centenaire, 1904, pp. 211 f.). 160 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS Rev, A triumphal arch, surmounted by an equestrian statue of Drusus, charging r. with spear couched, between two trophies, each with a captive at its foot ; inscription, DE GERM. Aureus. 7*69 grammes (118-7 grains). British Museum. Nero Drusus, the younger brother of Tiberius, and the favourite stepson of Augustus, died on 14th Sept., 9 B.C., as the result of a fall from his horse on his way from the Elbe to the Rhine. His body was brought to Borne, his brother Tiberius walking all the way beside the bier, and his memory was honoured in an unpre- cedented manner. A splendid funeral was partial compensation for the triumph of which death had robbed him. A cenotaph was erected to him on the Ehine, near Moguntiacum, and a marble triumphal arch on the Yia Appia. The Senate ordered the setting up of various statues, and granted to him and to his descendants the name of Germanicus. The triumphal arch and the name Germanicus are both recorded on the aureus No. 104. This coin and all the others relating to Drusus are obviously posthumous ; the question is whether they were struck immediately after his death, or much later. Owing, presumably, to the fact that a coin with the portrait of Drusus was struck by his son Claudius after he became Emperor, it has been supposed that all the pieces referring to the German victories date from the h.r.c. m 161 HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS reign of Claudius. It is true that some of them bear a portrait, the treatment of which recalls the style of the coins of Claudius ; this is the case with the aurei inscribed DE GERMAN IS in full (on a triumphal arch or around a trophy of arms). Our aureus with the shorter inscription, however, shows a broad treatment of the head which seems earlier, and it may well have been struck under Augustus or Tiberius. THE SENATORIAL MINT AT ANTIOCH. CIRCA 7 6 B.C. 105. Obv. Head of Augustus r., laureate ; around, KAIZA[POZ ZE]BAZTOY; fillet border. Rev. The Tyche of Antioch, wearing turreted crown, seated r. on rock ; she holds palm branch ; at her feet, half -figure of the river Orontes swimming ; around, ETOYZ crK NIKHZ, andin field, Yn (in monogram) IB and monogram of ANTIOX- Silver stater. 14*88 grammes (229*6 grains). B.M.C. Galatia, p. 166, No. 131. 106. Obv. IMP-AVGVST- TR'POT. Head of Augustus r., laureate ; beneath head, /ve (in mono- gram, retrograde). Rev. S'C* within laurel wreath. Bronze. 17*43 grammes (269 grains). B.M.C. Galatia, etc., p. 166, No. 128. The policy generally adopted by the Emperors from Augustus onwards, in regard to the bronze currency 162 HISTOKICAL EOMAN COINS of the Eastern provinces, was to leave the control in local hands. The municipal coinages sufficed for all ordinary purposes. The city of Antioch, however, was one of the three great cities of the Eastern provinces in which the Emperors established mints which played a special part in producing provincial currency. At Alexandria, the capital of the Imperial province of Egypt, the control of the coinage, both bronze and silver, remained entirely in Imperial hands ; there was no municipal coinage. Augustus, in fact, simply continued the Ptolemaic system ; his first Alexandrian pieces, issued in the period 30 — 27 B.C., are merely a continuation of the coinage of Cleopatra, with the same reverse types and the same marks of value. In a province which was peculiarly Imperial, the Senate naturally would be allowed no part in the coinage. At the mint of Caesarea in Cappadocia, which supplied the silver coinage for the greater part of Eastern Asia Minor, there is again no sign of Senatorial control. But at Antioch, the political and military centre of the Syrian province, the exten- sive and varied coinage falls into two or three classes. "We have, first, an Imperial silver coinage (No. 105) with the portrait of Augustus, the date (calculated from the " Yictory," i.e., according to the Actian era, and by the Emperor's consulship 1 ), and a representa- tion of the famous figure of the Tyche of Antioch 1 The abbreviation YII is for forccrou. m2 163 HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS by Eutychides of Sicyon. Again, there is a bronze coinage commemorating the assumption by Augustus of some high priesthood (whether the office of Pontifex Maximus or some local Antiochene dignity we do not know). But this coinage has a more definitely local character than the other, on which at first the name of Antioch does not appear at all. The inscrip- tions on these two classes are in Greek. The third class of coins with the head of Augustus is illustrated by No. 106. There is yet another small class of bronze coins, without the Emperor's head, but with the names of the legates of the province, Yarus (7 — 4 b.c.) and Saturninus (4 — 5 a.d.). 1 The reverse of No. 106 tells its own tale; the coin in fact corre- sponds to the brass and copper coins introduced at the Eoman mint by Augustus in 15 B.C. At what date, however, the Senatorial mint was established at Antioch it is difficult to determine. In 14 B.C. Augustus founded the colony of Berytus, and it might be urged that the organization of the mint at Antioch dates from the same period. But the coinage itself does not, apparently, begin until later ; the first of the silver coins above mentioned is of the 26th year of the Actian era : i.e., 6 — 5 B.C. The first coin with the name of Varus is of the preceding year, 7 — 6 B.C. The coins commemorating the high priesthood of 1 On these various bronze issues, see Macdonald in Numism. Chron. 1904, pp. 105 f. 164 HISTORICAL ROMAN COINS Augustus begin in 5 — 4 B.C., that is to say in the year when Varus' s tenure of office came to an end, and some change was evidently made in the arrange- ments of the mint. These u archieratic " coins con- tinued to be issued down to year 31 of the Actian era ( = 1 b.c. — 1 a.d.), ceasing at the same time as the silver coins with the figure of Tyche. These two issues of silver and bronze were thus, as Macdonald remarks, closely connected. As the Senatorial coinage is not likely to have been permitted before the Imperial, we may date the organization of the mint about7 — 6b. c. There is nothing on the coin No. 106 itself to prove its attribution to the mint of Antioch. But the pro- venance of coins of this class is Syrian ; and a chain of numismatic evidence, which we cannot follow here, links these coins to others which are certainly Antiochene. GAIUS CAESAR. CIRCA 5 B.C. 107. Obv. Head of Gaius Csesar r. ; below, CAESAR ; all in oak wreath. Rev. An incense altar, with lion's feet and ram's heads as decoration ; around, a wreath containing flowers, paterae and bucrania ; across field, AVGVST. Aureus. 7-96 grammes (122*8 grains). B.M.C. II., p. 42, No. 4468. This aureus, with the corresponding denarius, was assigned by Count de Salis to the mint of Borne and 165 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS the year 17 B.C., in which. Augustus adopted Gaius and Lucius, the sons of Agrippa by Julia. Now as Gaius was born in 734 a.tt.c. = 20 B.C., he was only three years old at that time ; his brother Lucius was still younger, having been born a few days before the adoption. The person whose head is represented on our coin must, however, have been at least in his teens at the time when the coin was struck ; a fact which it is difficult to reconcile with the date and interpretation given to the coin by De Salis. Further, had the piece been issued to celebrate the adoption of Gaius, we should have expected to find his brother represented on the same or on an analogous coin. But this one stands alone. It seems, therefore, that we must look somewhat later in the life of Gaius for the event which the coin commemorates. Before proceeding further, however, it is well to face any doubts we may have as to the identity of the person represented. It is just possible, but hardly probable, that the word CAESAR does not refer to the portrait, but is to be read with the word AVCVST which comes on the reverse. Even so, however, the portrait must represent some youth in intimate relationship with Augustus ; and the choice lies between Gaius and Lucius. And Gaius, being the elder, is more likely to have been represented alone than his brother. In his "Will 1 Augustus says, " Gaium et Lucium 1 Mon. Anc. ch. xiv. (Mommsen, Res gest? pp. 51 ff.). 166 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS Caesares honoris mei caussa senatus populusque Eomanus annum quintum et decimum agentis consules designavit, ut [e]um magistratum inirent post quin- quennium, et ex eo die, quo deducti [s]unt in forum , ut interessent consiliis publicis decrevit sena[t]us." The deductio in forum took place early in 749 = 5 B.C. l — perhaps, as Mommsen says, on 1st January. L. Caesar did not receive the toga virilis until three years later. But the designation of Gaius as consul did not necessarily take place at the same time as the deductio in forum? Some decent interval probably elapsed. It is to this interval that we may, perhaps, without rashness, assign the coin before us, Now Dio tells us, 3 in connexion with the admission of Gaius to public affairs, that he received Upaxrvvrjv nvL In this statement we may find an explanation of our reverse type. The thymiaterium or incense altar and the wreath — the constituents of which are the ordinary decorations of Roman altars 4 — both indicate some priestly office, as surely as do the sacrificial imple- ments which are so common as reverse types on Eoman coins. So far as our information goes, there is no objection to the date here suggested for this aureus. Placed 1 Sueton. Aug. 26; Zonar. 10. 35 : 12th consulship of Augustus. *' Mommsen, Res gest. pp. 52 f. disposes of the current belief that G-aius was designated consul while still praetextatus. 3 LV. 9. 4 See Eeisch in Pauly-Wissowa, i. 1679. 167 HISTOKICAL ROMAN COINS beside the coins of 17 B.C. it cannot be said that it looks "at home," even if the portrait could possibly be meant for a boy of three years. But if we bring it down to a later date, we cannot place it after the designation of Gaius as consul in 749 ; for such an honour would surely have been mentioned. 1 On the other hand, we can hardly put it before his assump- tion of the toga virilis early in that year, since we know of no occasion which would have justified the issue of a coin with his portrait before that event. The fabric of the coin is somewhat peculiar, and is unlike the Eoman fabric of the year to which De Salis assigned it ; nor does it fit well with the Eoman coins of the last ten years of the century. It is just possible that it was struck in Gaul. But if so, we are practi- cally compelled to date it three years earlier, i.e., to 8 B.C., when Gaius accompanied Tiberius on his cam- paign against the Sugambri. In that case, some other explanation must be found for the reverse type. GAIUS AND LUCIUS CAESARES. CIRCA 2 B.C. 108. Obv. Head of Augustus r., laureate ; around, CAESAR AVGVSTVS DIVI F PATER PATRIAE. 1 A fortiori, the coin cannot commemorate his death, -which "would have been in some way alluded to. 168 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS Rev. Gaius and Lucius standing to front, each, veiled and togate, holding a spear and shield ; above, sacrificial ladle and lituus ; in exergue, CL-CAESARES ; around, AVGVSTIF-COS-DESIG-PRINC'IVVENT. Aureus. 7*79 grammes (120*2 grains). British Museum. " [Fil]ios meos, quos iuv[enes mi]hi eripuit for[tuna], Gaium et Lucium Caesares honoris mei caussa senatus populusque Komanus annum quintum et decimum agentis consules designavit, ut [e]um magistratum inirent post quinquennium . . . equites [a]utem Eomani universi principem iuventutis utrumque eorum parm[is] et hastis argenteis donatum appellaverunt." 2 Augustus received the title of pater patriae on^ Feb. 5, 2 B.C. 2 C. Caesar had already in 5 b.c. been designated consul, to enter on his consulship in the fifth ensuing year, i.e., on Jan. 1, a.d. 1. This coin, therefore, since on it Augustus is called pater patriae y and Gaius is still consul designate, must have been struck between Feb. 5, 2 b.c. and Dec. 31, 1 b.c. The date of the acclamation of the two adopted sons of Augustus as principes iuventutis is not known. Mommsen inclines to the day on which they first laid aside the toga praetexta and appeared in public among 1 Mon. Anc. ch. xiv. ; Mommsen, Bea geat. pp. 51 f. 2 Mon. Anc. ch. xxxv. 169 HISTOEICAL EOMAN COINS the equites. That is of course the most probable occasion. The aureus ', to judge from its inscription, seems to have been struck mainly to commemorate the honours heaped upon the two princes. L. Caesar assumed the toga virilis and became consul designate in 2 B.C., probably on Jan. I. 1 It is reasonable to suppose that the coin was issued in the course of the same year. It is a brief commentary on the passages from the Monumentum Ancyranum and from Cassius Dio 2 relating to the entrance of the princes on public life. They are represented wearing the toga virilis; they are veiled, and sacrificial implements are placed beside them, to indicate that they held priestly offices, such as Dio mentions in connexion with Gaius. They have the silver shields and spears which the knights bestowed on them. 3 As Mommsen has shown, the attainment of the dignity of princeps iuventutis was equivalent to nomination as successor to the reigning Emperor. These coins, then, must have served as a means of pro- claiming the choice of Augustus. They were struck in great numbers, both in gold and silver, and circu- lated widely, not only in the Eoman Empire, but far 1 Mommsen, lies gest. p. 52. 2 LIV. 18. 3 Dio (lv. 12), in describing the funeral ceremony of Gaius and Lucius says that these decorations were dedicated in the Senate house ; hut he calls them golden. 170 HISTOEICAL KOMAN COINS beyond its limits. They are frequently found in India, 1 and it is a curious fact that the denarii from that source are nearly always of base metal plated with silver. Mommsen has accordingly suggested 2 that they were purposely issued for trade with South India. However this may be, the Indians found them much to their liking, and barbarous imitations con- tinued to be made in considerable numbers for many years after the originals first appeared in India. It was not the custom of barbarians in antiquity to imitate coins of bad quality ; the two Greek currencies which were most imitated by barbarians were the excellent coinages of Athens and of Philip II. of Macedon. Here we have an exception to the general rule, which awaits explanation. THE PANNONIAN TRIUMPH OP TIBERIUS. A.D. 13. 109. Obv. Head of Augustus r., laureate; around, CAESAR AVGVST[VS] DIVI F. PATER PATRIAE. Bev. Tiberius in a triumphal quadriga to r., holding a sceptre surmounted by an eagle and a laurel branch; around, TTCAESAR AVG-F'TR'POT- XV. Silver denarius. 3*16 grammes (48*7 grains). British Museum. 1 See Num. Chron. 1898, p. 319. 2 Mommsen-Blacas, iii. p. 337. 171 HISTOEICAL ROMAN COINS The dangerous Illyrico-Pannonian revolt, which broke out in a.d. 6, provoked by the demands made upon the provincials in preparation for Tiberius' expedition against the Marcomanni, was not quelled until the autumn of a.d. 9. Cassius Dio records 1 that Augustus accepted a triumph for the conclusion of this war ; whether he is correct or not, 3 Tiberius at any rate was saluted imperator and granted a triumph and two triumphal arches in Pannonia. The titles " Panno- nicus " and " Invictus " which it was also proposed to give him were, however, disallowed by Augustus. The fearful disaster to the legions of Yarus pre- vented Tiberius from immediately enjoying the honour accorded to him. He left almost at once for the Rhine, and was occupied there until the end of a.d. 12. Not until 16 Jan., a.d. 13 did he celebrate the long-delayed triumph. The date on this denarius and on corresponding aurei (tribunicia potestate %v.) is equivalent to the year a.d. 13 — 14, and the triumph commemorated is obviously the one with which we are concerned. The event is also commemorated on the magnificent cameo at Vienna, known as the Gemma Augustea, on which Tiberius is seen alighting from his chariot to greet Augustus. 3 1 LYI. 17. 2 See Mommsen, Bes gestae, p. 19. 3 Furtwangler, Ant. Oemmen, Taf. lvi. 172 PL. XV Nos. 101— 109. HISTOKICAL KOMAN COINS This — the last u historical coin" in the present selection — has brought us well into the Imperial period. The Koman money, as we have seen (p. 121) has already borne an Imperial character for something like half a century. "We stop on the threshold of an age in which the coinage is, if possible, still fuller of historical interest than we have found it during the three and a half centuries which we have surveyed. 173 INDEX [Italicised entries represent inscriptions on covns. The numbers refer to pages of the text.] A. C, 67, 69 Actium, victory of, 134 Adfru. emu. ex S. C, 79 Adramytteum, Senatus consultum of, 78 Aegusa, battle of (241 B.C.), 43 Aemilia, Vestal, 121 Aemilius Lepidus, M., moneyer (65 B.C.), 52 Aemilius Lepidus, M., propraetor in Sicily (80 B.C.), 53 Aemilius Lepidus, M., tutor of Ptolemaeus V., his career, 51 ff. Aemilius (M.), M. f, M. n. Scaurus, his campaign agaiust Aretas, and his aedilician games, 98 Aeneas carrying Anchises, 118, 121 Aerarium populi Romani, 81, 83 Aes grave of Campania, 11, 13 ; see also As. Aes rude, 14 Aes signatum, 13 f. Africa, head of, 94 f. Africa, Pompeius in, 94 f . Agrippa : defeats Sex. Pompeius, 127 ; xvir sacris faciundis, 149 A, Hirtius Pr., 107 Alexandrea, 51 Alexandria : coinage of, 163 ; head of, 51 ; M. Antonius triumphs at, 132 Allies. See Social "War. Altar of Lugdunum, 158. See also Incense altar. Antioch in Syria, coinage of, 162 f. Antium, subjection of, 4 Anton, son of Hercules, 118, 121 Antoni. Armenia devicta, 132 Antoni. imp. a. xU.> 124 175 INDEX Antonius augur cos. des. iter, et tert., 131 Antonius, M. : portraits of, 113, 118, 120, 131 f. ; his coinage as triumvir, 118 ; his legates in Gaul, 123 ff. ; birthday coins, 124 ; uses Hon as badge (?), 125 ; his relations with Ventidius, 131 ; his Armenian expedition, 131 ff., 147 ; his expedition against Phraates, 132 ; his triumph at Alexandria, 132 ; bestows kingdoms on Cleopatra and her sons, 132 f . ; his cistophori, 144 Anvil, 154 Aplustre, alluding to naval victory, 122 Apollo : head of, 9, 19, 24, 72, 89, 101 ; " Apollo " series of aes grave, 24 Apollonia : coins issued at, 105 f. ; " victoriati " of, 36 Appian Way, completion of, 10, 13, 18 Appuleius. See Saturninus. Aquillius, M', coins commemorating exploits of, 157 Ara Romae et Augusti, 159 Arches. See Triumphal. Aretas III., subjection of, 98 f. Argentum Publicum, 83 Arg. Pub., 83 Ariminum, arch at, 151 Armenia : expedition of M. Antonius against, 131 ff. ; given to Alexander, son of Cleopatra, 132 ; recovered by Augustus, 145 f. ; Lesser, given to Polemo, 133 n. Armenia devicta, 132, 134 Armenia recepta, 145 Armenian : arms, 145, 147 ; tiara, 131 f., 145, 147 Artavasdes, king of Armenia, 132 Artaxias, king of Armenia, 146 As : earliest libral, 6 f. ; reductions in, 21 &., 30 1, 46 f. ; of Augustus, 154, 156 Asia, Commune of, organized by Augustus, 143 f . Aug. suf. p., 148 August., 165 Augustus, 136, 138, 145 Augustus (see also Octavian): portraits of, 136, 138 f., 143, 145, 148, 150, 158, 162, 168, 171 ; receives oaken crown, laurels and golden shield, 137 ; recovers lost standards, 138 ff. ; builds shrine for them, 141 f. ; his temple of Mars Ultor, 140 f. ; organizes Com- mune Asiae, 144 f. ; celebrates secular games, 148 ; restores 176 INDEX public roads, 150 ff. ; reforms coinage, 153 ff. ; cult of, 158 ff. ; his monetary policy in the East, 163 ; receives title of " pater patriae," 169; declares G-. and L. Caesares his successors, 170; will of, see Monumentum Ancyranum. Augustus tribunic, 'potest., 153 Augustus tr. pot. vbh., 150 Aurei: of Caesar, 100 f., 104; of Pompeius, 94 f. ; of Sulla, 92 f. ; of the Triumvirs, 118 ff. See also Gold. Ausculum, battle of (279 B.C.), 26 Axe, sacrificial, 101, 104 A.