■nMNMW iOMM iiwriimwuiiwiiiiinMni BEING'WELL^BORN MICHAEL • f • GUYER HlllMlHMllllilllllllWlllW I CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH SERIES Va 7 S3 LIBRARY OF THE NEW YORK STATE COLLEGE OF HOME ECONOMICS CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA, NEW YORK "O 753.08°'"^" ''"'"^rsityu, Libran ^^-^,K':t'orn;an eugen Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924014036721 BEING WELL-BORN BEING WELL-BORN AN INTRODUCTION TO EUGENICS By MICHAEL F. GUYER, Ph. D. Professor of Zoology, The University of Wisconsin Childhood and Youth Series Edited by yi--^- O'SHEA Professor of Education, The University of Wisconsin INDIANAPOLIS THE BOBBS-MERRILL COMPANY PUBLISHERS Copyright 1916 The Bobbs-Merrill Company Printed in tlie United States of America TO MY WIFE HELEN M. GUYER EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION The writer recalls that when he was a young boy, he heard the grown-up people in the community earn- estly and incessantly debating the question: Does heredity play a greater part in shaping one's mind and body than does his environment? From that day to this he has listened to men and women in every walk of life discussing the relation of heredity to environ- ment in determining human traits. Teachers and par- ents are constantly asking: "Are such and such char- acteristics in my children due to their inheritance or to the way they have been trained?" Students of juve- nile delinquency and of mental defect and deficiency are searching everywhere for light on this matter. It is not to be wondered at that practically all people are peculiarly interested in this problem, since it con- cerns intimately one's personal traits, and it con- stantly confronts any one who is responsible for the care and culture of the young. It is suggestive to note how people differ in their views regarding the extent to which a child's physical and mental qualities and capacities are fixed definitely by his inheritance. The writer has often heard stu- dents in university classes discuss the subject; and their handling of the problem has shown how superficially and even superstitiously most persons regard the mechanism and functions of heredity. It is significant also to observe what extreme views many people hold EDITORS INTRODUCTION regarding the possibility of affecting a child's traits and abilities by subjecting him to specific influences during his prenatal life. In any group of one hundred persons chosen at randojn, probably seventy-five will believe in specific prenatal influence. Many of them will believe in birthmarks due to peculiar experiences of the mother. A popular book recently published as- serts among other things that if a mother will'look upon beautiful pictures and listen to good music during the prenatal period of her child, the latter will pos- sess esthetic traits and interests in high degree. On the other hand, people generally do not seem to think that degenerate parents beget only degenerate chil- dren. Alcoholics, feeble-minded persons and the like are permitted to bring children into the world. Very few people have any precise knowledge of the mechanism of heredity. The whole thing is inscrutable to them, and is shrouded in mystery. Superstition flourishes among even intelligent persons in respect to heredity, and errors due to education, and tragedies resulting from vicious social organization are all alike ascribed to its uncontrollable forces. Most people are none the wiser because they do not know to what, extent the physical and mental defects and deviations of individuals are due to inheritance or to the malign influences of the individual's environment and training. Professor Guyer, who has studied the whole prob- lem in a thoroughgoing, scientific way, has prepared this book with a view to illuminating some of the mysteries that surround the subject of heredity, and EDITOR S INTRODUCTION to dispelling the illusions that persist regarding it. He shows the method which nature follows in the development of the individual. He presents the laws which have become established respecting the extent to which and the manner in which immediate and remote ancestors contribute to the child's physical and mental organism. He answers many questions which those who are engaged in social work or in education in the home or the school are asking to- day. He discusses subjects upon which every serious- minded person wishes to be informed. He has thus made a book which is both of theoretical and of prac- tical interest. He has written in a style which should make his book attractive to the parent and the teacher as well as to the student of the complicated mechanism of in- heritance. Only a few special terms are used, and these should not give any reader trouble, because the treatment throughout is so concrete that the meaning of the terms will be easily grasped. Further, the book is illustrated with many attractive and instructive il- lustrations which will show at a glance the working of the principles of inheritance which are developed in the text. This book may be heartily commended to all who are interested in questions of human nature, education and social reform. It should enable the parent, the teacher and the legislator to understand more clearly than most of them now do in how far children's traits EDITOR S INTRODUCTION and possibilities are or can be fixed by inheritance as contrasted with environmental conditions and nurture in home, school, church and institutional life. Madison, Wisconsin. M. V. O'Shea. PREFACE One of the most significant processes at work in society to-day is the awakening of the civiHzed world to the rights of the child ; and it is coming to be real- ized that its right of rights is that of being well-born. Any series of publications, therefore, dealing primarily with the problems of child nature may very fittingly be initiated by a discussion of the factor of well-nigh supreme importance in determining this nature, he« redity. No principles have more direct bearing on the wel- fare of man than those of heredity, and yet on scarcely any subject does as wide-spread ignorance prevail. This is due in part to the complexity of the subject, but more to the fact that in the past no clear-cut methods of attacking the manifold problems involved had been devised. Happily this difficulty has at least in part been overcome. It is no exaggeration to say that during the last fifteen years we have made more progress in measur- ing the extent of inheritance and in determining its elemental factors than in all previous time. Instead of dealing wholly now with vague general impressions and speculations, certain definite principles of genetic transmission have been disclosed. And since it is be- coming more and more apparent that these hold for man as well as for plants and animals in general, we can no longer ignore the social responsibilities which the new facts thrust upon us. PREFACE Since what a child becomes is determined so largely by its inborn capacities it is of the greatest importance that teachers and parents realize something of the nature of such aptitudes before they begin to awaken them. For education consists in large measure in ap- plying the stimuli necessary to set going these poten- tialities and of affording opportunity for their expres- sion. Of the good propensities, some will require merely the start, others will need to be fostered and coaxed into permanence through the stereotyping ef- fects of proper habits ; of the dangerous or bad, some must be kept dormant by preventing improper stimu- lation, others repressed by the cultivation of inhibitive tendencies, and yet others smothered or excluded by filling their place with desirable traits before they themselves come into expression. We must see clearly, furthermore, that even the best of pedagogy and parental training has obvious limits. Once grasp the truth that a child's fate in life is fre- quently decided long before birth, and that no amount of food or hospital service or culture or tears will ever wholly make good the deficiencies of bad "blood," or in the language of the biologist, a faulty germ- plasm, and the conviction must surely be borne home to the intelligent members of society that one thing of superlative importance in life is the making of a wise choice of a marriage mate on the one hand, and the prevention of parenthood to the obviously unfit ' on the other. In the present volume it is intended to examine into PREFACE the natural endowment of the child. And since full comprehension of it requires some understanding of the nature of the physical mechanism by which heredi- tary traits are handed on from generation to genera- tion, a small amount of space is given to this phase. Then, that the reader may appreciate to their fullest extent the facts gathered concerning man, a review of the more significant principles of genetics as re- vealed through experiments in breeding plants and animals has been undertaken. The main applications of these principles to man is pointed out in a general discussion of human heredity. Finally, inasmuch as all available data indicate that the fate of our very civ- ilization hangs on the issue, the work concludes with an account of the new science of eugenics which is striving for the betterment of the race by determining and promulgating the laws of human inheritance so that mankind may intelligently go about conserving good and repressing bad human stocks. In order to eliminate as many errors as possible and to avoid oversights I have submitted various chapters to certain of my colleagues and friends who are au- thorities in the special field treated therein. While these gentlemen are in no way responsible for the ma- terial of any chapter they have added greatly to the value of the whole by their suggestions and comments. Thus I am indebted to Professor Leon J. Cole for reading the entire manuscript; to Professors A. S. Pearse and F. C. Sharp for reading Chapter VII; to Professor C. R. Bardeen for 'reading special parts ; PREFACE to Doctor J. S. Evans for reading Chapter VI and part of V; to Doctor W. F. Lorenz, of the Mendota Hos- pital, for reading Chapter VIII; to Judge E. Ray Stevens for reading Chapter IX, and to Helen M. Guyer for several readings of the entire manuscript. Grateful acknowledgment is made to all of these readers, to various publishers and periodicals for the use of certain of the illustrations, to the authors of the numerous books and papers from which much of the material in such a work as this must necessarily be selected, and to my artist. Miss H. J. Wakeman, for her painstaking endeavors to make her work con- form to my ideas of what each diagram should show. M. F. G. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I Heredity 1 Blood heritage — Kind determined by origin — Ancestry a network — Ancestry in royalty — Off- spring derived from one parent only — Dual an-- cestry an aid in studying heredity — Reversion — Telegony — Prenatal influences apart from he- redity — Parent body and germ not identical — A hereditary character defined — Hereditary mingling a mosaic rather than a blend — De- terminers of characters, not characters them- selves, transmitted — Our knowledge of hered- ity derived along three lines — The method of experimental breeding — The statistical method • — Galton's law of regression — Correlations be- tween parents and offspring — The bioraetrical method, statistical, not physiological — Mental as well as physical qualities inheritable. 11 The Bearers of the Heritage 20 The cell the unit of structure — ^Unicellular or- ganisms — Importance of cell-theory — Heredity in unicellular forms — Reproduction and hered- ity in colonial protozoa — Conjugation — Spe- cialization of sex-cells — The fertilized ovum — Advancement seen in the Volvox colony — Nat- ural death — Specialization in higher organisms — Sexual phenomena in higher forms — Cell-di- vision — Chromosomes constant in number and appearance — Significance of the chromosomes^ Cleavage of the egg — Chief processes operative in building the body — The origin of the new germ-cells — Significance of the early setting apart of the germ-cells — Individuality of chro- CONTENTS— Con^tnM^d CHAPTER PAGE mosomes — Pairs of chromosomes — Reduction of the number of chromosomes by one-half — Maturation of the sperm-cell— Maturation of the egg-cell— Parallel between the two proc- esses — Fertilization — Significance of the be- havior of the chromosomes — A single set of chromosomes sufficient for the production of an organism— The duality of the body and the sin- gleness of the germ — The cytoplasm in inherit- ance — Chromosomes possibly responsible for the distinctiveness of given characters — Sex and heredity — Many theories of sex determina- tion — The sex-chromosome — Sex-linked char- acters in man — In lower forms. Ill Mendelism (>1 New discoveries in the field of heredity — Men- del — Rediscovery of Mendelian principles — In- dependence of inheritable characters — Illustra- tion in the Andalusian fowl — The cause of the ratio — ^Verification of the hypothesis — Dominant and recessive — Segregation in the next genera- tion — Illustrated in guinea-pigs — Terminology — The theory of presence and absence — Addi- tional terminology — Dominance not always complete — Modifications of dominance — Men- del's own work — Dihybrids — Getting new com- binations of characters — Segregations of the de- •terminers — Four kinds of gametes in each sex — The 9:3:3:1 ratio — Phenotype and genotype — The question of blended inheritance — Nils- son-Ehle's discoveries — Such cases easily mis- taken for true blends — Skin-color in man — Questionable if real blends exist — The place of the Mendelian factors in the germ-cell— Parallel between the behavior of Mendelian CONTENTS— Co;!hH«<7i HAPTER PACE factors and chromosomes — A single chromo- some not restricted to carrying a single deter- miner. IV Mendelism in Man 97 Probably applicable to many characters in man — Difficult to get correct data — A generalized presence-absence formula — Indications of in- complete dominance — Why after the first gen- eration only half the children may show the dominant character — Eye-color in man — Hair- color — Hair-shape — Irregularities — Digital mal- formations — Eye defects — Other defects inher- ited as dominants — Recessive conditions more difficult to deal with — Albinism — Other reces- sive conditions in man — Breeding out defects — Other inheritable conditions in man. V Are Modifications Acquired Directly by the Body Inherited? 121 Which new characters are inherited? — Exam- ples of somatic modifications — Use and disuse — The problem stated — Special conditions in mammals — Three fundamental questions — Ex- ternal influences may directly affect the germ- cells — Such effects improbable in warm- blooded animals — Poisons may affect the germ-plasm — How can somatic modifications be registered in germ-cells? — Persistence of Men- delian factors argues against such a mode of inheritance — Experiments on insects — On plants — On vertebrates — Epilepsy in guinea-pigs — Ef- fects of mutilations not inherited — Transplanta- tion of gonads — Effects of body on germ, general not specific — Certain characters inex- plicable as inherited somatic acquirements — CONTENTS— Continued CHAPTER PAGE Neuter insects— Origin of new characters in germinal variation— Sexual reproduction in re- lation to new characters— Many features of an organism characterized by utility — Germinal va- riation a simpler and more inclusive explana- tion — Analysis of cases — Effects of training — Instincts — Disease — Reappearance not necessa- rily inheritance — Prenatal infection not inher- itance — Inheritance of a predisposition not in- heritance of a disease — Tuberculosis — Two indi- viduals of tubercular stock should not marry — Special susceptibility less of a factor in many diseases — Deaf-mutism — Gout — Nervous and mental diseases — Other disorders which have hereditary aspects — Induced immunity not in- herited — Social, ethical and educational signifi- cance of non-inheritance of somatic modifica- tions — No cause for discouragement — Improved environment will help conserve superior strains when they do appear. VI Prenatal Influences IS! All that a child possesses at birth not necessa- rily hereditary — The myth of maternal impres- sions — Injurious prenatal influences — Lead poisoning — The expectant mother should have rest — Too short intervals between children — Expectant mothers neglected — Alcoholism — Un- reliability of most data — Alcohol a germinal and fetal poison — Various views of specialists on the effects of alcoholism on progeny — The affinity of alcohol for germinal tissue — Innate degeneracy versus the effects of alcohol— Ex- perimental alcoholism in lower animals — Fur- ther remarks on the situation in man— Much inebriety in man due to defective nervous con- COi^TEnrS— Continued CHAPTER PAGE stitution — Factors to be reckoned with in the study of alcohohsm — Venereal diseases — The seriousness of the situation — Infantile blind- ness — Syphilis — Some of the effects — ^A blood test — Many syphilitics married — ^Why permit existing conditions to continue? — Ante-nuptial medical inspection — The perils of venereal dis- ease must be prevented at any cost — Bad en- vironment can wreck good germ-plasm. VII Responsibility for Conduct 195 All mental process accompanied by neural process — Gradations in nervous response from lower organisms to man — Behavior of many animals often an automatic adjustment to sim- ple external agents — Tropisms — Certain appar- ently complex volitions probably only tropisms — Complicating factors — Many tropic responses apparently purposeful — Tropisms grade into re- flex actions and instincts — Adjustability of in- stincts opens the way for intelligent behavior — Modification of habits possible in lower an- imals — Some lower vertebrates profit by experience — Rational behavior — Conceptual thought probably an outgrowth of simpler psychic states — The capacity for alternative ac- tion in higher animals — The elemental units of the nervous system are the same in lower and higher animals — Neuron theory — Establishment of pathways through the nervous system^ Characteristic arrangements of nerve cells sub- ject to inheritance — Different parts of the cor- tex yield different reactions — Skill acquired in one branch of learning probably not transferred to another branch — Preponderance of cortex in highest animals — Special fiber tracts in the CONTENTS— Con/wM^i CHAPTER PAGE spinal cord of man and higher apes — Great complexity in associations and more neurons in the brain of man— The nervous system in the main already staged at the time of birth- Many pathways of conduction not yet estab- lished—The extent of the modifiable zone un- known — Various possibilities of reaction in the child — Probable origin of altruistic human con- duct — Training in motive necessary — Actual practise in carrying out projects important — Interest and difficulty both essential — The reali- zation of certain possibiHties of the germ rather than others is subject to control — We must af- ford the opportunity and provide the proper stimuli for the development of good traits — Moral responsibility. VIII Mental and Nervous Defects 228 Prevalence of insanity — Imperfect adjustments of the brain mechanism inheritable — Many mental defectives married — Disproportionate increase in number of mental defectives — Pro- tests voiced by alienists — Examples of hered- itary feeble-mindedness — Difficult to secure ac- curate data — Feeble-mindedness and insanity not the same — Many types of insanity — Not all insanities of the same eugenical significance — ■ Difficulties of getting genealogies of specific forms of insanity — Certain forms of insanity seem to behave as Mendelian recessives — Grades of feeble-mindedness — About two-thirds of feeble-mindedness inherited — Some results of non-restraint of the feeble-minded — Not all cases of mental deficiency inherited — Epileptics — Feeble-mindedness probably a recessive- Many apparently normal people are carriers of CONTENTS— ConhnM^i CHAPTER PAGE neuropathic defects— Tests for mental defi- ciency — The backward child in school — The ex- ceptionally able child — Cost of caring for our mentally disordered — Importance of rigid seg- regation of the feeble-minded — Importance of early diagnosis of insanity — Opinion of com- petent psychiatrists essential — Some insanities not hereditary — Importance of heredity in in- sanity not appreciated. IX Crime and Delinquency 263 Heredity add environment in this field — Feeble- mindedness often a factor — Many delinquent girls mentally deficient — Institutional figures misleading — Many prisoners mentally subnor- mal — Inhibitions necessary to social welfare — The high-grade moron a difficult problem — De- generate strains— Intensification of defects by inbreedinjf — Vicious surroundings not a suffi- cient explanation in degenerate stocks — Not all delinquents defectives — No special inheritable crime-factor — What is a born criminal? — Epileptic criminal especially dangerous — The mental disorders most frequently associated with crime — Bearing of immigration on crime and delinquency — Sexual vice — School instruc- tion in sex-hygiene — Mere knowledge not the crux of the sex problem — Early training in self-restraint an important preventive of crime and delinquency — Multiplication of delinquent defectives must be prevented. X Race Betterment Through Heredity . . . 289 Questionable charity — Past protests — An in- creasing flood of defectives — Natural elimina- tion of defectives done away with — ^Why not CONTENT S— Co n tinued CHAPTER TAGS prevent our social maladies ?— Eugenics defined — Improved environment alone will not cure racial degeneracy— Heredity and environment — Inter-racial marriage— Human conservation- Kindness in the long run- The problem has two phases— Constructive eugenics must be based on education — Inferior increasing more rapidly than superior stocks— An unselected population may contain much valuable material — The lack of criteria for judging fitness — The college graduate — Native ability, independence and energy eugenically desirable — Four chil- dren to each marriage required to maintain a stock — Factors contributing to low birth-rate in desirable strains — The educated public must be made to realize the situation — Utilization of family pride as a basis for constructive eu- genics — The tendency for like to marry like — Public opinion as an incentive to action — Choosing a marriage mate means choosing a parent — The best eugenic marriage also a love match — The elimination of the gro'ssly unfit ur- gent — Suggested remedies — Inefficacy of laws which forbid marriage of mental defectives — Systems of mating; impracticable in the,main — Corrective mating presupposes knowledge of eugenics — Segregation has many advocates — • Sterilization as a eugenic measure — To what conditions applicable — In insanity — In feeble- mindedness — In cases of epilepsy — Sterilization laws — Social dangers in vasectomy — Our pres- ent knowledge insufficient — Sterilization laws on trial — Aa educated public sentiment the, most valuable edgtnk agent — The question bf personal liberty — Educatiori ci women in eu- genics needed — Much yet to be done — A work- ing program — Which shall it be? Glossary . 343 References for Further Reading and Study . 355 Index 361 BEING WELL-BORN BEING WELL-BORN CHAPTER I HEREDITY It is a commonplace fact that offspring tend to re- semble their parents. So commonplace, ilideed, that few stop to wonder at it. No one misunderstands us when we say that such and such a young man is "a chip off the old block," for that is simply an emphatic way of stating that he resembles one or the other of his parents. The same is true of such familiar ex- pressions as "what's bred in the bone," "blood will tell," and kindred catch phrases. All are but recog- nitions of the same common fact that offspring exhibit various characteristics similar to those of their pro- genitors. Blood Heritage. — To this phenomenon of re- semblance in successive generations based on ancestry the term heredity is applied. In man, for instance, there is a marked tendency toward the reappear- ance in offspring of structures, habifs, features, and even personal mannerisms, minute physical defects, and intimate mental peculiarities like those pos- sessed by their parents or more remote forebears. These personal characteristics based on descent from a common source are what we may call the blood her- itage of the child to discriminate it from a wholly 1 2 BEING WELL-BORN different kind of inheritance, namely, the passing on from one generation to the next of such material things as personal property or real estate. Kind Determined by Origin. — It is inheritance in the sense of community of origin that determines whether a given living creature shall be man, beast, bird, fish, or what not. A given individual is human because his ancestors were human. In addition to this stock supply of human qualities he has certain well- marked features which we recognize as characteristics of race. That is, if he is of Anglo-Saxon or Italian or Mongolian parentage, naturally his various qual- ities will be Anglo-Saxon, Italian, or Mongolian. Still further, he has many distinctive features of mind and body that we recognize as family traits and lastly, his personal characteristics such as designate him to us as Tom, Harry, or James must be added. The latter would include such minutias as size and shape of ears, nose or hands ; complexion ; perhaps even cer- tain defects ; voice ; color of eyes ; and a thousand other particulars. Although we designate these man- ifold items as individual, they are in reality largely more or less duplicates of similar features that occur in one or the other of his progenitors, features which he would not have in their existing form but for the hereditary relation between him and them. "O Damsel Dorothy ! Dorothy Q. ! Strange is the gift that I owe to you ; What if a hundred years ago Those close-shut lips had answered 'No,' HEREDITY 3 Should I be I, or would it be One-tenth another, to nine-tenths me?" "Soft is the breath of a maiden's yes ; Not the light gossamer stirs with less ; But never a cable that holds so fast Through all the battles of wave and blast, And never an echo of speech or song That lives in the babbling air so long ! There were tones in the voice that whispered then You may hear to-day in a hundred men." When life steps into the world of matter there comes with it a sort of physical immortality, so to speak ; not of the individual, it is true, but of the race. But the important thing to note is that the race is made up, not of a succession of wholly unrelated forms, but a continuation of the same kind of living organ- isms, and this sameness is due to the actual physical descent of each new individual from a predecessor. In other words, any living organism is the kind of organism it is in virtue of its hereditary relation to its ancestors. It is part of the biologist's task to seek a material basis, a continuity of actual substance, for this con- tinuity of life and form between an organism and its offspring. Moreover, inasmuch as the offspring is never precisely similar to its progenitors he must de- termine also what qualities are susceptible of trans- mission and in what measure. Ancestry a Network. — From the fact that each child has all of the ancestors of its mother as well as of its father, arises the great complications which are met with in determining the lineage of an individual. 4 BEING WELL-BORN A person has two parents, four grandparents, eight great grandparents, and thus following out pedigree it is plain to be seen that through this process of doubling in each generation, in the course of a few centuries one's ancestry is apparently enormous. By actual computation, according to Professor D. S. Jor- dan, if we count thirty generations back to the Norman invasion of England in 1066, at this ratio of duplica- tion, the child of to-day would have had at that tijne an ancestry of 8,598,094,592 persons. But we know that the total number of inhabitants in England dur- ing the time of William the Conqueror was but a small fraction of this enormous aggregate. This means that we shall have to modify our inference that a child has twice as many ancestors as its parents ; a condition which at first sight seems evident, but which is not literally true. The fact is that the parents of the child, in all probability, have many ancestors in common — a state of affairs which is brought about through the intermarriage of relatives, and this is especially frequent among remoter descendants of common progenitors. Time after time in genealogy strains of blood have crossed and recrossed until it is not improbable that a man of to-day who is of Eng- lish origin has the blood in his veins from eveiy in- habitant of England who lived during the time of William the Conqueror and left fruitful descendants. Instead of conceiving of ancestry as an ever branch- ing and widening tree-like system as it recedes into the past, it is more accurate, therefore, to regard it in the light of an elaborate meshwork. The "family tree" in reality becomes the family net. HEREDITY 5 Ancestry in Royalty. — The pedigrees of royal families have proved to be of much importance in the study of human inheritance, not that royal traits are any more heritable than any other, but simply because the records have been carefully kept so that they are the most comprehensive and easily followed pedigrees available. The netlike weave of ancestry is particu- larly well exemplified in some of these families because of much close intermarriage. Their heritage typifies on an intensified scale the heritage of the mass of mankind. For example, if we go six generations back in the ancestry of Frederick the Great instead of the expected sixty-four individual ancestors we find only forty ; or in a still more closely woven stock, in the Spanish royal line of Don Carlos we find in six gen- erations instead of sixty-four individual ancestors, only twenty-eight. While the present German em- peror might have had four thousand ninety-six an- cestors in the twelfth generation back, it is estimated that owing to intermarriage he probably had only five hundred thirty-three. Offspring Derived from One Parent Only. — So far in our reckoning of heredity we have counted elements from both father and mother, and the com- plications which arise from such a double ancestry are manifestly very perplexing ones. If we could do away with the elements of sex and find offspring that are derived from one parent only, it would seemingly simplify our problem very much for we should thus have a direct line of descent, free from intermingling. This, in fact, occurs to a greater or less extent among lower animals in a number of instances, There may 6 BEING WELL-BORN be only female forms for a number of generations and the eggs which they produce develop directly into new individuals. Moreover, many of the simpler or- ganisms have the power of dividing their bodies into two and thus giving rise to two new forms, each of which resembles the parent. This shows plainly that we may have inheritance without the appearance of any male ancestor at all, hence sex is not always a necessary factor in reproduction or heredity. The de- velopment of eggs asexually, that is, without uniting first with a male cognate, is termed parthenogenesis. The ordinary plant louse or aphid which is frequently found upon geraniums is a familiar example of an animal which reproduces largely in this way. During the summer only the females exist and they are so astonishingly fertile that one such aphid and her progeny, supposing none dies, will produce one hun- dred million in the course of five generations. In the last broods of the fall, males and females appear and fertile eggs are produced which lie dormant through the winter to start the cycle of the next year. Again, the eggs of some kinds of animals which normally have to unite with a male germ before they develop, can be made to develop by merely treating them with chemical solutions. The difference between an ofif- spring derived in such a manner, and one which has developed from an egg fertilized by the male is that it is made up of characteristics from only one source, the maternal. Dual Ancestry an Aid in Studying Heredity. — Although we have the factors of heredity in a more simplified form in the case of asexual transmission. HEREDITY 7 as a matter of fact most of our insight into the prob- lems of heredity has been attained from a study of sexually reproducing forms, because the very exist- ence of two sets of more or less parallel features offers a kind of checking up system by which-we can follow a given characteristic. Reversion. — Occasionally, however, plants and animals do not develop the complete individuality we might expect, but stop short at or re-attain some an- cestral stage along the line of descent, and thus come to resemble some progenitor perhaps many genera- tions back of their own time. Thus it is well known that as regards one or more characteristics a child may resemble a grandparent or often some remote ancestor much more closely than it does its immediate parent. The reappearance of such ancestral traits the student of heredity designates as Reversion or Atavism. Reversion may occur apparently in any class of plants or animals. It is especially pronounced among domesticated forms, which through man's selection have been produced under more or less artificial con- ditions. For example, among fancy breeds of pigeons, there may be an occasional return to the old slaty blue color of the ancestral rock-pigeon, with two dark cross-bars on the wings, from which all modern breeds have been derived. This is almost sure to happen if the fancy varieties are inter-crossed for two or three generations. Another example of re- version frequently cited is the occasional reappeajance in domestic poultry of the reddish or brownish color pattern of the ancestral jungle-fowl to which, among 2 8 BEING WELL-BORN modern forms, the Indian game seems most nearly related in color. Still another example is the cross- bars or stripes occasionally to be seen on the forelegs of colts, particularly mules, reminiscent of the extinct wild progenitors which were supposedly striped. Fig. 1, p. 9, is a picture of a hybrid between the common fowl and the guinea-fowl. The chevron- like markings on certain feathers show a reversion to a type of color pattern that is prevalent among both the primitive pheasants (the domestic chicken is a pheasant) and the primitive guinea-fowls. Although the common spotted guinea-fowl may be crossed with a black chicken which shows no trace of barring, nevertheless the hybrid offspring are likely to bear a chevron-like pattern such as that shown in the pic- ture. There has been much quibbling over the relative meanings of reversion and atavism. The general idea, whichever term we use, is that there is a "throwing back" in a noticeable degree through inheritance to some ancestral condition beyond the immediate par- ents. A few recent authors have taken the term atavism in a restricted sense and use it to signify spe- cifically those not uncommon cases in which a par- ticular character of an offspring resembles the corre- sponding character of a grandparent instead of a parent. Such, for example, as the blue eye-color of a child with brown-eyed parents, each of whom in turn has had a blue-eyed parent. The tendency of other authors is to abandon the term entirely because of the diversity of meaning that has been attached to it in the past. HEREDITY 9 Certain classes of so-called reversions, such as the case of the eye-color just cited, are readily explicable on Mendelian principles as we shall see in a later FiG.l -Hybrid between the guinea-fowl and the comnion fowl, showing in many feathers reversion to a primitive chevron- like barring. chapter, but probably not all kinds of phenomena de- scribed as reversion can be so explained. For ex- ample, some seem to be cases of suppressed develop- ment. The word reversion, indeed, must be looked on 10 BEING WELL-BORN as a convenient descriptive term rather than as the name of a single specific condition. Telegony. — There is yet a wide-spread belief in the supposed influence of an earlier sire on ofif spring born by the same mother to a later and different sire. This alleged phenomenon is termed telegony. For example, many dog-breeders assert that if a thorough- bred bitch has ever had pups by a mongrel father, her later offspring, although sired by a thoroughbred, will show taints of the former mongrel mating. In such cases the female is believed to be ruined for breeding purposes. Other supposed instances of such in- fluences have been cited among horses, cattle, sheep, pigs, cats, birds, pets of various kinds and even men. The historic case most frequently quoted is that of Lord Morton's mare which bore a hybrid colt when bred to a quagga, a striped zebra-like animal now extinct. In later years the same mare bore two colts, sired by a black Arabian horse. Both colts showed stripes on the neck and other parts of the body, par- ticularly on the legs. It was inferred that this striping was a sort of after effect of the earlier breeding \Yith the quagga. In recent times, however, Professor Ewart has repeated the experiment a number of times with different piares using a Burchell zebra as the test sire. Although his experiments have been devised so as to conduce in every way possible to telegony his re- sults have been negative. Moreover, it has been pointed out that the stripes on the legs of the two foals alleged to show telegony could not have been derived from the quagga sire for, unlike zebras, quaggas did not have their legs striped. Further- HEREDITY 11 more it is known that the occurrence of dark brown stripes on the neck, withers and legs of ordinary colts is not uncommon, some cases of which have exhibited more zebra-Hke markings than those of the colts from Lord Morton's mare. It seems much more probable, therefore, that the alleged instances are merely cases of ordinary reversion to the striped ancestral color pattern which probably characterized the wild pro- genitors of the domesticated horse. Various experiments on guinea-pigs, horses, mice and other forms, especially devised to test out this al- leged after-influence of an earlier sire, have all proved negative and the general belief of the biologist to- day is that telegony is a myth. Prenatal Influences Apart from Heredity. — In discussing the problems of heredity it is necessary to consider also the possibilities of external influences apart from lineage which may affect offspring through either parent. Although modifications derived directly hy the parent, and prenatal influences in general, are of extremely doubtful value as of permanent inherita- ble significance, nevertheless they must be reckoned with in any inventory of a child's endowment at birth. Impaired vitality on the part of the mother, bad nu- trition and physical vicissitudes of various kinds all enter as factors in the birthright of the child, who, moreover, may bear in its veins slumbering poisons from some progenitor who has handed on blood taints not properly attributable to heredity. Of such im- portance is this kind of influence to the welfare of the immediate child that it will be necessary to discuss it in considerable detail in a later chapter. \?. BEING WELL-BORN Parent Body and Germ Not Identical. — Inasmuch as each new individual appears to arise from material derived from its parent, taking the evidence at its face value one might suppose that any peculiarity of or- ganization called forth in the living substance of the parent vi^ould naturally be repeated in the offspring, but a closer study of the developing organism from its first inception to maturity shows this to be probably a wrong conclusion. The parent-body and the repro- ductive substance contained in that body are by no means identical. It becomes an important question to decide, in fact, how much effect, if any, either per- manent or temporary, the parent-body really has on the germ. A given fertile germ (Fig. 2, p. 13) gives rise by a succession of divisions to a body which we call the in- dividual, but such a germ also gives rise to a series of new germ-cells which reside in that individual, and it is these germ-cells, not something derived from the body, that pass on the determiners of distinguishing features or qualities from generation to generation. It is only by grasping the significance of this fact that we can understand how in certain cases a totally dif- ferent set of characters may appear in an offspring than those manifested in either parent. An Hereditary Character Defined. — By a charac- ter, in discussions in heredity, is meant simply a trait, feature or other characteristic of an organism. Where we can pick out a single definable characteristic which acts as a unit in heredity, for greater accuracy we term it a unit-character. Many traits are known to be inherited on a unit basis or are capable of being HEREDITY 13 analyzed into factors which are so inherited. These unit-characters are in large measure inherited inde- pendently of one another apparently, although cases of characters inherited as a unit along with other characters are known. Hereditary Mingling a Mosaic Rather Than a Blend. — The independence of unit-characters in in- heritance leads us to the important conclusion that the mingling of two lines of ancestry into a new indi- vidual is in no sense bringing them into the "melting isssa ■Body Fig. 2 Diagram illustrating germinal continuity. Through a series of divisions a germ-cell gives rise to a body or a soma and to new germ-cells. The latter, not the body, give rise in turn to the next generation. pot," as it has been picturesquely expressed, but it is rather to be regarded as the mingling of two mosaics, each particle of which retains its own individuality, and which, even if overshadowed in a given genera- tion, may nevertheless manifest its qualities undimmed in later generations when conditions favorable to its expression transpire. Determiners of Characters, Not Characters Them- selves, Transmitted. — The fact should be thoroughly understood that the actual thing which is transmitted by means of the germ in inheritance is not the charac- ter itself, but something which will determine the 14 BEING WELL-BORN character in the offspring. It is important to remem- ber this, for often these determiners, as they are called, may lie unexpressed for one or more genera- tions and may become manifest only in later descend- ants. The truth of the matter is, the child does not inherit its characters from corresponding characters in the parent-body, but parent and child are alike be- cause they are both products of the same line of germ-plasm, both are chips from the same old block. METHODS OF STUDYING HEREDITY Before entering into details it will be well to get some idea of the methods which are commonly em- ployed in arriving at conclusions in the field of he- redity. Some of these are extremely complex and all that we can do in an elementary presentation is to get a glimpse of the procedures. Our Knowledge of Heredity Derived Along Three Lines. — Our modern conceptions of heredity have been derived mainly from three distinct lines of investigation: First, from the study of embryology, in which the biologist concerns himself with the gen- esis of the various parts of the individual, and the mechanism of the germs which convey the actual ma- terials from which these parts spring ; second, through experimental breeding of plants and animals to com- pare particular traits or features in successive genera- tions; and third, through the statistical treatment of observations or measurements of a large number of parents and their offspring with reference to a given characteristic in order to determine the average ex- HEREDITY IS tent of resemblance between parents and children in that particular respect. The Method of Experimental Breeding. — A tre- mendous impetus was given to the method of experi- mental breeding when it was realized that we can itemize many of the parts or traits of an organism into entities which are inherited independently one of another. Such traits, or as we have already termed them, unit-characters, may be not only independently heritable but independently variable as well. The ex- perimental method seeks to isolate and trace through successive generations the separate factors which de- termine the individual unit-characters of the organism. In this attempt cross-breeding is resorted to. Forms which differ in one or more respects are mated and the progeny studied. Next these -off spring are mated with others of their own kind or mated back with the respective parent types. In this way the behavior of a particular character may often be followed and the germinal constitutions of the individuals concerned can be formulated with reference to it. Inasmuch as we shall give much consideration to this method in the chapter on Mendelism we need not consider it further here. The Statistical Method. — The statistical method seeks to obtain large bodies of facts and to deal with evidence as it appears through mathematical analysis of these facts. The attempt of its followers is to treat quantitatively all biological processes with which it is concerned. Historically Sir Francis Galton was the first to make any considerable application of statistical methods to the problems of heredity and variation. In 16 BEING WELL-BORN his attempts to determine the extent of resemblance between relatives of different degree as regards bod- ily, mental and temperamental traits, he devised new methods of statistical analysis which constitute the basis of modern statistical biology, or biometry as it is termed by its votaries. Professor Karl Pearson in particular has extended and perfected the mathemat- ical methods of this field and stands to-day as per- haps its most representative exponent. The system is in the main based on the calculus of probability. The methods often are highly specialized, requiring the use of higher mathematics, and are therefore only at the command of specially trained workers. Just as insurance companies can tell us the probable length of human life in a given social group, since al- though uncertain in any particular case, it is reducible in mass to a predictable constant, so the biometrician with even greater precision because of his improved rriethods can often, when a large number of cases are concerned, give us the intensity of ancestral influence with reference to particular characters. For example, it is clear that by measuring a large number of adult human beings one can compute the average height or determine the height which will fit the greatest number. There will be some individuals below and some above it, but the greater the diver- gence from this standard height the fewer will be the individuals concerned. Galton compared the heights of 204 normal English parents and their 928 adult offspring. In order to equalize the measurements of men and women he found he had to multiply each female height by 1.08. HEREDITY 17 Then, to take both parents into account when compar- ing height of parents to that of children he added the height of the father to the proportionately augmented height of the mother and divided by two, thus secur- ing the height of what he termed the "mid-parent." He found that the mid-parental heights of his subjects ranged from 64.5 to 72.5 inches, and that the general mode was about 68.5 inches. It should be mentioned that the mode, in a given population, represents the group containing the largest number of individuals of one kind ; it may or may not coincide with the average. The children of all mid-parents having a given height were measured next and tabulated with reference to these mid-parents. The results of Galton's measure- ments may be expressed simply as follows : MODE Height of mid-par- ent in inches Average height of offspring 64.5 B5.8 65.5 66.7 66.5 67.2 67.5 67.6 68.5 68.3 69.5 68.9 70.5 69.5 71.5 72.5 .972.2 The Law of Regression. — It is plain from this table that the offspring of short mid-parents tend to be under average or modal height though not so far be- low as their parents. Likewise children of tall parents tend to be tall but less tall than their parents. This fact illustrates what is known as Galton's law of re- gression; namely, that if parents in a given popula- tion diverge a certain amount from the mode of the population as a whole, their children, while tending to 18 BEING WELL-BORN resemble them, will diverge less from this mode. It is clear that the extent of regression is an inverse meas- ure of the intensity of inheritance from the immediate parents; if the deviation of the offspring from the general mode w^ere nearly as great as that of their parents then the intensity of the inheritance must be high ; if but slight— that is, if the offspring regressed nearly to the mode — then the intensity of the inheri- tance must be ranked as low. In the example in question it must be ranked as relatively high. Com- putations show that as regards stature the fraction two-thirds represents approximately the amount of resemblance between the two generations where both parents are considered. Correlations Between Parents and Offspring. — In modern researches the conception of mid-parent and mid-grandparent as utilized by Galton has been largely abandoned. It has been found more convenient as well as more accurate to keep the measurements of the two parents separate and to deal with correlations between fathers and sons, fathers and daughters, mothers and sons, mothers and daughters, brother and brother, etc. Professor Pearson and his pupils have found for a number of characters that the correlation between either parent and children, whether sons or daughters, is relatively close. The correlation between brother and brother, sister and sister, and brother and sister, usually ranges a little higher than the corre- sponding relation between parents and children. The Biometrical Method, Statistical, Not Physio- logical. — While biometry may in certain cases go far toward showing us the average intensity of the HEREDITY 19 inheritance of certain characters it can not replace the method of the experimental breeder which deals with particular characters in individual pedigrees. It must be borne in mind that the biometrical method is a statistical and not a physiological one and that it is applicable only when large numbers of individuals are considered in mass. It is most valuable in cases where we are unable sharply to define single characters, due probably to the concurrent action of a number of in- dependent causes, or where experiment is impossible so that we have to depend solely on numerical data gained by observation. Mental Qualities Inheritable. — Galton showed by this method long ago, and Pearson and his school have extended and more clearly established the work, that exceptional mental qualities tend to be inherited. While on the average the children of exceptional par- ents tend to be less exceptional than their parents, still they are far more likely to be exceptional than are the children of average parents. By this method Professor Pearson has shown that such mental and tempera- mental attributes as ability, vivacity, conscientiousness, temper, popularity, handwriting, etc., are as essen- tially determined as are physical features through the hereditary endowment. CHAPTER II THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE Before we can make any detailed analysis of the in- heritance of characters we should have some general idea of the physical structure of animals and par- ticularly some familiarity with the development of an individual from the egg, as well as some knowledge of the nature of the germ-cells. The Cell the Unit of Structure. — If we examine one of the higher animals, as, for example, the horse, the dog, or man, we find that it is made up of a large number of constituents, such as bones, muscles, nerv- ous elements, blood and other tissues. Each kind of tissue is composed of a number of living units, or- dinarily microscopic in size, which are known as cells. A careful examination of various cells reveals that al- though they may differ greatly in size, shape and minor details, they all alike possess certain well-marked char- acteristics. Each when reduced to its fundamental form is seen to consist of a small mass of living matter termed protoplasm in which may usually be distin- guished two regions — the cell-body or cytoplasm, and the nucleus (Fig. 3, p. 21). Any cell, whether it be of the brain, of the liver, or from any organ of an ani- mal or plant, has this same fundamental structure. In addition, a limiting membrane or wall of some kind is generally present, although it is not a necessary con- stituent of all cells. 20 THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 21 Unicellular Organisms. — While such a structure as a tree or a horse is composed of countless millions f # .a -a o of cells, on the other hand numerous organisms, both plant and animal, exist which consist of only one cell. Yet this cell is just as characteristically a cell as are 22 BEING WELL-BORN the components of a complex animal or plant. It has the necessary parts, the cell body and the nucleus. Moreover it exhibits all of the fundamental activities of life, though in a simplified form, that a complex higher organism does. Importance of Cell-Theory.— This discovery that every living thing is a single cell or an aggregation of cooperating cells and cell-products is one of our most important biological generalizations because it has brought such a wide range of phenomena under a common point of view. In the first place, the struc- ture of both plants and animals is reducible to a com- mon fundamental unit of organization. Moreover, both physiological and pathological phenomena are more readily understood since we recognize that the functions of the body in health or disease are in large measure the result of the activities of the individual cells of the functioning part. Then again, the prob- lems of embryological development have become much more sharply defined since it could be shown that the egg is a single cell and that it is through a series of divisions of this cell and subsequent changes in the new cells thus formed that the new organism is built up. And lastly, the problem of hereditary transmis- sion has been rendered more definite and approachable by the discovery that the male germ is likewise a sin- gle cell, that fertilization of the egg is therefore the union of two cells, and that in consequence the mech- anism of inheritance must be stowed away somehow in these two cells. Heredity in Unicellular Forms. — In unicellular animals one can readily see how it is possible for an THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 23 individual always to give rise to its own kind. One of the simplest of the single-celled animals is the Ameba (Fig. 4, p. 24). The ameba eats and grows as do other animals. Sooner or later it reaches a size beyond which it can not increase advantageously, yet it is con- tinuously taking in new food material which stim- ulates it to further growth. Here then is a prob- lem. The ameba solves this difficulty by dividing to form two amebae. Such a division is illustrated in Fig. 4, p. 24. First the nucleus divides, then the cell- body. When the two new amebae separate com- pletely each renews the occupation of eating and growing. But what has become of the parent? Here, where once existed a large adult ameba are two young amebae. The parent individual as such has disap- peared, yet there has been no death, for we have simply two bits of living jelly in place of one. They will in turn repeat the same process, so will their off- spring, and thus, barring accident, this growth and re- production, or overgrowth as we may regard it, may go on forever, as far as we know. Here the problem of heredity, or the resemblance of offspring to parent, is not a very complicated one. The substance of the cell-body and cell-nucleus divides into two similar halves, so that each descendant has the substance of the parent in its own body, only it has but half as much. It differs from the parent, not in quality or kind, but in size. Reproduction, and Heredity in Colonial Protozoa. — There are enormous numbers of these single-celled animals existing in all parts of the world. Some are 24 BEING WELL-BORN simple like the ameba, others are very complex in structure. Many, after division, move apart and pur- Fig. 4 Six successive stages in the division of Ameba polypodia (after Schulze). The nucleus is seen as a dark spot in tlie interior. sue wholly independent courses of existence. On the other hand we find a modification appearing in some which is of the greatest importance. After division instead of moving apart the two cells may remain side THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 25 by side and divide further to form two more, these in turn may divide and thus the process goes on until there is formed what is known as a colony. Each cell of such a colony resembles the original ancestral cell because each is a part of the actual substance of that cell. As in the ameba, the first two cells are the an- cestral cell done up in two separate packets, and thus finally the full quota of cells must be so many separate packets of the same kind of material. Inasmuch as each is but a repetition of its original ancestor, it can, and at times does, produce a colony of the same kind as that ancestor produced. Conjugation. — At longer or shorter intervals, how- ever, we find that two individuals, on the disrup- tion of the old colony, instead of continuing the routine of establishing new colonies through a series of cell divisions, very radically alter their behavior. They unite and fuse into a single larger individual. This process is called conjugation. We find it occur- ring even in some species of ameba. The conjugating cells in some colonies are alike in size and appearance, in others different. Specialization of Sex-Cells. — A beautiful sphere- shaped colony known as Volvox is to be found occa- sionally in roadside pools. Depending on the species of Volvox to which it belongs, the colony may be made up of from a few hundred to several thousand individuals arranged in a single layer about the fluid- filled center of the sphere and bound together by a clear jelly-like inter-cellular substance. Each indi- vidual cell also connects with its neighbors by means of thin threads of living matter. One of the largest 26 BEING WELL-BORN species is Volvox globator, one edge of which is rep- resented in Fig. 5, p. 27. Mutual pressure of the cells gives them a. polygonal shape when viewed from the surface. Each cell, with a few exceptions to be noted immediately, bears two long flagella, whip-like struc- tures which project out into the water. The lashing of these flagella gives the ball a rotary motion and thus it moves about. When the colony has reached its adult condition and is ready to reproduce itself, cer- tain cells without flagella and somewhat larger than the ordinary cells become more rounded in outline and increase considerably in size through the acquisition of food materials. They are then known as egg cells or ova. Each ovum finally enters on a series of cell- divisions forming a mass of smaller and smaller cells which gradually assumes the form of a hollow sphere like the parent colony. The young colonies thus formed drop into the interior of the parent colony to escape later to the outside as independent swimming organisms when the old colony dies and disintegrates. The Fertilized Ovum Termed a Zygote. — After a number of generations of such asexual reproduc- tion, sexual reproduction occurs. The ova arise as usual. Certain members of the colony, on the other hand, go to the other extreme and divide up into bun- dles of from sixty-four to one hundred twenty-eight minute slender cells, each provided with flagella for locomotion. When mature these small flagellate cells, now known as spermatozoa, escape into the interior of the parent colony and swim about actively. Ultimately each ovum is penetrated by a spermatozoon, the two cells fuse completely and thus form the single fertil- THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 27 ized ovum or zygote. The body-cells of the mother colony finally disintegrate. After a period of rest each zygote, through a series of cell-divisions, develops into an adult Volvox. In some species of Volvox a still further advance is seen, in that instead of both kinds of gametes being produced in the same colony, the ova -may be produced by one colony and the spermatozoa Fig. S Volvox glohator (from Hegner after Oltmanns). Half of a sexually reproducing colony : o, eggs ; s, spermatozoa. by another. Here, then, -we. have the foreshadowings of two sexes as separate individuals, a: phenomenon of universal occurrence among the highest forms of ani- mal life. Advancement Seen in the Volvox Colony. — In the Volvox colony there is a distinct advance over the conditions met with in various lower protozoan col- onies in that only certain individuals of the colony 28 BEING WELL-BORN take part in the process of reproduction and these in- dividuals are of two distinct types ; one is a larger, food-laden cell or egg and the other a small, active, fertilizing cell. The motile forms are produced in much greater numbers than the eggs, plainly because they have to seek the egg and many will doubtless perish before this can be accomplished. This dis- parity in number is only a means of insuring fertiliza- tion of the egg. The remaining cells of the body carry on the ordinary activities of the colony such as loco- motion and nutrition and have ceased to take any part in the production of new colonies. Natural Death Appears With the Establishment of a Body Distinct from the Germ. — Volvox is an organism of unusual interest because in it we see a prophecy of what is to come. Although still regarded as a colony of single-celled individuals, it represents in reality a transition between the whole group of uni- cellular animals termed protozoa and the many celled animals characterized by the possession of distinct tis- sues, known as Metazoa. Moreover, it shows an in- teresting stage in the establishment of a body or soma distinct from special reproductive cells which have taken on the function of reproducing the colony. In such colonial forms natural death is found appearing for the first time, the reproductive cells alone con- tinuing to perpetuate the species. Then again Volvox represents an important step in the establishment of sex in the animal kingdom for in its sexual reproduc- tion the conjugating cells known as gametes are no longer alike in appearance but have become dififerenti- ated into definite ova and spermatozoa. THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 29 In Volvox as in the other organisms which we have studied we find that all of the cells including the germ-cells are produced by the repeated division of a parent cell, and consequently each must contain the characteristic living substance of that parent. Many other forms might be cited to illustrate reproduction in single-celled animals, whether free or in colonies, but all such cases would be practically but repetitions or modifications of those we have already examined. Specialization in Higher Organisms. — If we pass on to the higher animals and plants which are not sin- gle cells or colonies of similar cells but organisms made up of many different kinds of cells, we' find a pro- nounced extension of the phenomenon met with in Volvox. Instead of each cell executing indeperfd- ently all of the life relations, certain ones are set apart for the performance of certain functions to the exclu- sion of other functions which are carried on by other members of the aggregation. Thus the organism as a whole has all the life relations carried on, but, as it were, by specialists. Sexual Phenomena in Higher Forms. — In the re- production of multicellular organisms, one sees like- wise but a continuation of the phenomena exhibited in Volvox. Ordinarily, each new form is produced by the successive divisions of a single germ-cell which in the vast majority of cases has conjugated with another germ-cell. In the development of the egg, as the di- visions proceed, groups of cells become modified for their particular work until the entire organism is com- pleted. During development certain cells are set apart for reproduction of the form just as they were in 30 BEING WELL-BORN Volvox. These two kinds of reproductive cells in multicellular organisms are derived ordinarily from two separate individuals known as male and female, though there are some exceptions. The main differ- ence between these cells which will have to unite to form a single fertile germ-cell, is that they have spe- cialized in different directions ; one is small and active, the other large, food-laden and passive. But with two such germ-cells coming as they do from two indi- viduals, one the male, the other the female, it is ob- vious that the actual living substance of which each germ is composed will be distinctive of its own parental line and that when the germs unite these distinctive factors commingle, hence the complications of double ancestry arise. Structure of the Cell. — Before we can understand certain necessary details of the physical mechanism of inheritance we must inquire a little further into the finer structure of the cell and into the nature of cell division. A typical cell, as it would appear after treat- ment with various stains which bring out the different parts more distinctly, is shown in Fig. 3, p. 21. Typical, not that any particular kind of living cell resembles it very closely in appearance, but because it shows in a diagrammatic way the essential parts of a cell. In the diagram, there are two well-marked regions ; a central nucleus and a peripheral cell-body or cytoplasm. Other structures are pictured but only a few of them need command our attention at present. At one side of the nucleus one observes a small (lot or granule surrounded by a denser area of cytoplasm. This body is called the THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 31 centrosomc. The nucleus in this instance is bounded by a well-marked nuclear membrane and within it are several substances. What appear to be threads of a faintly staining material, the linin, traverse it in every direction and form an apparent network. The parts on which we wish particularly to rivet our attention are the densely stained substances scattered along or embedded in the strands of this network in irregular granules and patches. This substance is called chro- matiii. It takes its name from the fact that it shows great affinity for certain stains and becomes intensely colored by them. This deeply colored portion of the cell, the chromatin, is by most biologists regarded as of great importance from the standpoint of heredity. One or more larger masses of chromatin or chromatin- like material, known as chromatin nucleoli, are often present, and not infrequently a small spheroidal body, differing in its staining reactions from the chromatin- nucleolus and sometimes called the true nucleolus, exists. Cell-Division. — In the simplest type of cell-divi- sion the nucleus first constricts in the middle, and finally the two halves separate. This separation is fol- lowed by a similar constriction and final division of the entire cell-body, which results in the production of two new cells. This form of cell-division is known as simple or direct division. Such a simple division, while found in higher animals, is less frequent and appar- ently much less significant than another type of divi- sion which involves profound changes and rearrange- ments of the nuclear contents. The latter is termed 32 BEING WELL-BORN mitotic or indirect cell-division. Fig. 6, p. 33, illus- trates some of the stages which are passed through in indirect cell-division. The centrosome which lies pas- sively at the side of the nucleus in the typical cell (Fig. 6a, p. 33) awakens to activity, divides and the two components come to lie at the ends of a fibrous spindle. In the meantime, the interior of the nucleus is under- going a transformation. The granules and patches of chromatin begin to flow together along the nuclear net- work and become more and more crowded until they take on the appearance of one or more long deeply- stained threads wound back and forth in a loose skein in the nucleus (Fig. 6b, p. 33). If we examine this thread closely, in some forms it may be seen to consist of a series of deeply-stained chromatin granules packed closely together intermingled with the sub- stance of the original nuclear network. As the preparations for division go on the coil in the nucleus breaks up into a number of segments which are designated as chromosomes (Fig. 6c, p. 33). The nuclear membrane disappears. The chromosomes and the spindle-fibers ultimately become related in such a way that the chromosomes come to lie at the equator of the spindle as shown in Fig 6d, p. 33. Each chromo- some splits lengthwise to form two daughter chromo- somes which then diverge to pass to the poles of the spindle (Figs. 6e and /, p. 33). Thus each end of the spindle comes ultimately to be occupied by a set of chromosomes. Moreover each set is a duplicate of the other, because the substance of any individual chromo- some in one group has its counterpart in the other. In fact this whole complicated system of indirect division THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 33 iaktm«Jt Fig. 6 Diagram showing representative stages in mitotic or indi- rect cell-division : a, resting cell with reticular nucleus and single centrosome; b, the 'two new centrosomes formed by division of the old one are separating and the nucleus is in the spireme stage; c, the nuclear wall has disappeared, the spireme has broken up into six separate chromosomes, and the spindle is forming between the two centrosomes ; d, equa- torial plate stage in which the chromosomes occupy the equa- tor of the spindle; e, f, each chromosome splits lengthwise, and the daughter chromosomes thus formed approach their respective poles ; g, reconstruction of the new nuclei and divi- sion of the cell body; h, cell-division completed. 34 . BEING WELL-BORN is regarded by most biologists as a mechanism for bringing about the precise halving of the chromosomes. The chromosomes of each group at the poles finally fuse and two new nuclei, each similar to the original one, are constructed (Figs. 6g and h, p. 33). In the meantime a division of the cell-body is in progress which, when completed, results in the formation of two complete new cells. As all living matter if given suitable food, can con- vert it into living matter of its own kind, there is no difficulty in conceiving how the new cell or the chro- matin material finally attains to the same bulk that was characteristic of the parent cell. In the case of the chromatin, indeed, it seems that there is at times a precocious doubling of the ordinary amount of ma- terial before the actual division occurs. Chromosomes Constant in Number and Appear- ance. — With some minor exceptions, to be noted later, which increase rather than detract from the sig- nificance of the facts, the chromosomes are always the same in number and appearance in all individuals of a given species of plants or animals. That is, every species has a fixed number which regularly recurs in all of its cell-divisions. Thus the ordinary cells of the rat, when preparing to divide, each display, sixteen chromosomes, the frog or the mouse, twenty-four, the lily twenty-four, and the maw-worm of the horse only four. The chromosomes of different kinds of animals or plants may differ very much in appearance. In some they are spherical, in others rod-like, filamentous or perhaps of other forms. In some organisms the chromosomes of the same nucleus may differ from one THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 35 another in size, shape and proportions, but if such differences appear at one division they appear at others, thus showing that in such cases the differences are constant from one generation to the next. Significance of the Chromosomes. — The question naturally arises as to what is the significance of the chromosomes. Why is the accurate adjustment which we have noted for their division necessary ? The very existence of an elaborate mechanism so admirably adapted to their precise halving, predisposes one to- ward the belief that the chromosomes have an impor- tant function which necessitates the retention of their individuality and their equal division. Many biologists accept this along with other evidence as indicating that in chromatin we have a substance which is not the same throughout, that different regions of the same chromosome have different physiological values. When the cell prepares for divisions, the granules, as we have seen, arrange themselves serially into a definite number of strands which we have termed chromosomes. Judging from all available evidence, the granules are self-propagating units ; that is, they can grow and reproduce themselves. So that what really happens in mitosis in the splitting of the chromosomes is a precise halving of the series of individual granules of which each chromosome is constituted, or in other words each granule has reproduced itself. Thus each of the two daughter cells presumably gets a sample of every kind of chromosomal particle, hence, the two cells are qualitatively alike. To use a homely illustra- tion we may picture the individual chromosomes to ourselves as so many separate trains of freight cars, 36 BEING WELL-BORN each car of which is loaded with different merchan- dise. Now, if every one of the trains could split along its entire length and the resulting halves each grow into a train similar to the original, so that instead of one there would exist two identical trains, we should have a phenomenon analogous to that of a dividing chromosome. Cleavage of the Egg. — It is through a series of such divisions as these that the zygote or fertilized egg-cell builds up the tissues and organs of the new organism. The process is technically spoken of as cleavage. Cleavage generally begins very shortly after fertilization. The fertile egg-cell divides into two, the resulting cells divide again and thus the process con- tinues, with an ever-increasing number of cells. Chief Processes Operative in Building the Body. — Although of much interest, space will not permit of a discussion in detail of the building up of the special organs and tissues of the body. It must suffice merely to mention the four chief processes which are opera- tive. These are, (1) infoldings and outfoldings of the various cell complexes; (2) multiplication of the com- ponent cells; (3) special changes {histological differ- entiation) in groups of cells ; and (4) occasionally re- sorption of certain areas of parts. The Origin of the New Germ-Cells. — On account of the unusual importance from the standpoint of in- heritance, which attaches to the germ-cells, a final word must be said about their origin in the embryo. While the evidence is conflicting in some cases, in others it has been well established that the germ-cells are set apart very early from the cells which are to THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE Z7 differentiate into the ordinary body tissues. Fig. 7 A, p. 38, shows a section through the eight-celled stage of Miastor, a fly, in which a single large, primordial germ-cell (p. g. c.) has already been set apart at one end of the developing embryo. The nuclei of the rest of the embryo still lie in a continuous protoplasmic mass which has not yet divided up into separate cells. The densely stained nuclei at the opposite end of the section are the remnants of nurse-cells which origi- nally nourished the t.g%. Fig. 7B, p. 38, is a longitudinal section through a later stage in the development of Miastor; the primitive germ-cells (oog) are plainly visible. Still other striking examples might be cited. Even in vertebrates the germ-cells may often be de- tected at a very early period. Significance of the Early Setting Apart of the Germ-Cells. — It is of great importance for the reader to grasp the significance of this early setting apart of the germ-cells because so much in our future dis- cussion hinges on this fact. The truth of the statement made in a previous chapter that the body of an indi- vidual and the reproductive substance in that body are not identical now becomes obvious. For in such cases as those just cited one sees the germinal sub- stance which is to carry on the race set aside at an early period in a given individual; it takes no part in the formation of that individual's body, but remains a slumbering mass of potentialities which must bide its time to awaken into expression in a subsequent gener- ation. Thus an egg does not develop into a body which in turn makes new germ-cells, but body and germ- cells are established at the same time, the body 38 BEING WELL-BORN harboring and nourishing the germ-cells, but not generating them (Fig. 2, p. 13). The same must be true also in many cases where the earliest his- o'6 g Fig. 7 A — Germ-cell (p. g. c) set apart in the eight-celled stage of cleavage in Miastor americana (after Hegner). The walls of the remaining seven somatic cells have not yet formed though the resting or the dividing (M p) nuclei may be seen ; c R, chromatin fragments cast off from the somatic cells. B — Section lengthwise of a later embryo of Miastor; the primordial egg-cells (oogs) are conspicuous (after Hegner). tory ■ of the germ-cells can not be visibly followed, because in any event, in all higher _ animals, they THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 39 appear long before the embr)'o is mature and must therefore be descendants of the original egg-cell and not of the functioning tissues of the mature individual. This need not necessarily mean that the germ-cells have remained wholly unmodified or that they con- tinue uninfluenced by the conditions which prevail in the body, especially in the nutritive blood and lymph stream, although as a matter of fact most biologists are extremely skeptical as to the probability that in- fluences from the body beyond such general indefinite effects as might result from under-nutrition or from poisons carried in the blood, modify the intrinsic na- ture of the germinal substances to any measurable ex- tent. Germinal Continuity. — The germ-cells are col- lectively termed the germinal protoplasm and it is obvious that as long as any race continues to exist, al- though successive individuals die, some germinal pro- toplasm is handed on from generation to generation without interruption. This is known as the theory of germinal continuity. When the organism is ready to reproduce its kind the germ-cells awaken to activity, usually undergoing a period of multiplication to form more germ-cells before finally passing through a proc- ess of what is known at maturation, which makes them, ready for fertilization. The maturation process proper, which consists typically af two rapidly suc- ceeding divisions, is preceded by a marked growth in size of the individual cells. Individuality of Chromosomes. — Before we can understand fully the significance of the changes which go on during maturation we shall have to know more 40 BEING WELL-BORN about the conditions which prevail among the chromo- somes of cells. As already noted each kind of animal or plant has its own characteristic number and types of chromosomes when these appear for division by mitosis. In many organisms the chromosomes are so nearly of one size as to make it difficult or impossible to be sure of the identity of each individual chromo- some, but on the other hand, there are some organ- isms known in which the chromosomes of a single nucleus are not of the same size and form (Fig. 8, p. 41). These latter cases enable us to determine some very significant facts. Where such differences of shape and proportion occur they are constant in each suc- ceeding division so that similar chromosomes may be identified each time. Moreover, in all ordinary mitotic divisions where the conditions are accurately known, these chromosomes of different types are found to be present as pairs of similar elements; that is, there are two of each form or size. Pairs of Similar Chromosomes in the Nucleus Be- cause One Chromosome Comes from Each Parent. — When we recall that the original fertilized egg from which the individual develops is really formed by the union of two gametes, ovum and spermatozoon, and that each gamete, being a true cell, must carry its own set of chromosomes, the significance of the pairs of similar chromosomes becomes evident; one of each kind has probably been contributed by each gamete. This means that the zygote or fertile ovum contains double the number of chromosomes possessed by either gamete, and that, moreover, each tissue-cell of the new individual will contain this dual number. For, as we THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 41 j-iave seen, the number of chromosomes is, with pos- sibly a few exceptions, constant in the tissue-cells and early germ-cells in successive generations of indi- viduals. For this to be true it is obvious that in some way the nuclei of the conjugating gametes have come to contain only half the usual number. Technically the tissue-cells are said to contain the diploid number of chromosomes, the gametes the reduced or haploid number. ^ -^ >.* Fig. 8 A — Chromosomes of the mosquito (Culex) after Stevens. B — Chromosomes of the fruit-fly (Drosophila) after Metz. Both of these forms have an unusually small number of chromosomes. In Maturation the Number of Chromosomes Is Reduced by One-Half. — ^This halving, or as it is known, reduction in the number of chromosomes is the essential feature of the process of maturation. It is accomplished by a modification in the mitotic divi- sion in which instead of each chromosome splitting lengthwise, as in ordinary mitosis, the chromosomes unite in pairs (Fig. 9b, p. 42), a process known tech- nically as synapsis, and then apparently one member of each pair passes entire into one new daughter cell, 42 BEING WELL-BORN the other member going to the other daughter cell (Fig. 9c, p. 42). In the pairing preliminary to this reduction division, leaving out of account certain spe- cial cases to be considered later, according to the Fig. 9 Diagram to illustrate spermatogenesis : a, showing th» diploid number of chromosomes (six is arbitrarily chosen) as they occur in divisions of ordinary cells and spermatogonia; b, the pairing (synapsis) of corresponding mates in the pri- mary spermatocyte preparatory to reduction ; c, each second- ary spermatocyte receives three, the haploid number of chro- mosomes ; d, division of the secondary spermatocytes to form e, spermatids, which transform into /, spermatozoa. best evidence at our command the union always takes place between two chromosomes which match each other in size and appearance. Since one of these is THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 43 believed to be of maternal and the other of paternal origin, the ensuing division separates corresponding mates and insures that each gamete gets one of each . kind of chromosome although it appears to be a mat- ter of mere chance whether or not a given cell gets the paternal or the maternal representative of that kind. Maturation of the Sperm-Cell. — In the maturation of the male gamete the germ-cell, now known as a spermatogonium, increases greatly in size to become a primary spermatocyte. In each primary spermato- cyte the pairing of the chromosomes already alluded to occurs as indicated in Fig. 9b, p. 42, where six is taken arbitrarily to indicate the ordinary or diploid number of chromosomes, and three the reduced or haploid number. The division of the primary sperma- tocyte gives rise to two secondary spermatocytes (c),- the paired chromosomes separating in such a way that a member of each pair goes to each secondary sperma- tocyte. Each secondary spermatocyte (d) soon di- vides again into two spermatids (e), but in this second division the chromosomes each split lengthwise as in an ordinary division so that there is no further reduc- tion. In some forms the reduction division occurs in the secondary spermatocytes instead of the primary. Each spermatid transforms into a mature spermato- zoon (f). The spermatozoa of most animals are of linear form, each with a head, a middle-piece and a long vibratile tail which is used for locomotion. The head consists for the most part of the transformed nucleus and is consequently the part which bears the chromosomes. 44 BEING WELL-BORN Maturation of the Egg-Cell.— As regards the be- havior of the chromosomes the maturation of the ovum parallels that of the sperm-cell. There are not so many primordial germ-cells formed and only one out of four of the ultimate cells becomes a functional egg. As in maturation of the sperm-cell there is a growth period in which oogonia enlarge to become primary oocytes (Fig. 10&, p. 45). In each primary oocyte as in the primary spermatocyte the chromosomes pair and two rapidly succeeding divisions follow in one of which the typical numerical reduction in the chromo- somes occurs. A peculiarity in the maturation of the ovum is that there is a very unequal division of the cytoplasm in cell division so that three of the result- ing cells usually termed polar bodies are very small and appear like minute buds on the side of the fourth or egg-cell proper. The scheme of this formation of the polar bodies is indicated in Fig. 10, p. 45. In Fig. \Qh the chromosomes are seen paired and ready for the first division; that is, for the formation of the first polar body. Figs. 10c, d, p. 45, show the giving of? of this body. Note that while only a small proportion of the cytoplasm passes into this tiny cell, its chromatin content is as great as that of the ovum. A second polar body (Figs. lOe, f, p. 45) is formed by the egg, but in this case each chromosome splits lengthwise, as in ordinary mi- tosis, and there is no further numerical reduction. In the meantime, typically, a third polar body is formed by division of the first. (Stages e, f, g.) Parallel Between the Maturation of Sperm- and Egg-Cell. — This rather complex procedure of the THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 45 germ-cells will be rendered more intelligible through a careful study of Figs. 9 and 10, pp. 42 and 45, and Fig. 11, p. 46, which indicates the parallel conditions in spermotogenesis and oogenesis. The view now generally held regarding the polar Fig. 10 Diagram to illustrate oogenesis : a, showing the diploid number of chromosomes (six is arbitrarily chosen) as they occur in ordinary cells and oogonia; b, the pairing of corre- sponding mates preparatory to reduction ; c, d, reduction di- vision, giving off of first polar body; e, egg preparing to give off second polar body, first polar body ready for division ; /, g, second polar body given off, division of first polar body completed. The egg nucleus, now known as the female pro- nucleus, and each body contain the reduced or haploid number of chromosomes. bodies is that they are really abortive eggs. They later disappear, taking no part in embryo- formation. It can readily be seen how such an unequal division is advantageous to the large cell, for it receives all of the 46 BEING WELL-BORN rich store of food material that would be distributed among the four cells if all were of equal size. This increased amount of food is a favorable provision for Spermatogenesis 1 gan'o V^'-v Multiplication Period Croh/tli Period Oogenesis I m k) Pr/rrlort/ f.dlT^] I Pairing of Chromosames Spermoceci/te V \Zj/y J I /' \ j Reciucing division / Primary oUcyLe \ I / \^ Sec ondar^ occyle ^'ipywn ana first "polar boc/if) \ /Mature ovum full number 0/ I ^ 'T \ Zuqou t Chromoiomei \ - ' I ferfihz restored \ l"ni-^ Fig. 11 Diagram showing the parallel between maturation of the sperm-cell and maturation of the ovum. the forthcoming offspring whose nourishment is tnus more thoroughly insured. THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 47 On the other hand, all of the sperm-cells develop into complete active forms, which, as aforesaid, usu- ally become very much elongated and develop a motile organ of some kind. In such cells an accumulation of food to any large extent would hinder rather than help them, because it would seriously interfere with their activity. Fertilization. — In fertilization (Fig. 12, p. 48) the spermatozoon penetrates the wall of the ovum and after undergoing considerable alteration its nucleus fuses with the nucleus of the egg. In some forms only the head (nucleus) and middle-piece enter, the tail being cut off by a so-called fertilization membrane which forms at the surface of the egg and effectually blocks the entrance of other spermatozoa. Thus nor- mally only one spermatozoon unites with an egg. In some forms while several may enter the egg only one becomes functional. As soon as the nucleus of the spermatozoon, now known as the male pronucleus, reaches the interior of the egg, it enlarges and be- comes similar in appearance to the female pronucleus. It swings around in such a way (Fig. \2b, p. 48) that the middle piece, now transformed into a centrosome, lies between it and the female pronucleus. The two pronuclei (c, d, c). each containing the reduced num- ber of chromosomes, approach, the centrosome di- vides, the nuclear walls disappear, the typical division spindle forms, and the chromosomes of paternal and maternal origin respectively come to lie side by side at the equator of the spindle ready for the first division or cleavage (f, g). It will be noted that the individual chromosomes do not intermingle their substance at this 48 BEING WELL-BORN time, but that each apparently retains its own individ- uaHty. There is considerable evidence which indi- cates that throughout life the chromosomes contrib- Diagram to illustrate fertilization; $, male pronucleus; 9, female pronucleus ; observe that the chromosomes of ma- ternal and paternal origin respectively do not fuse. used by the male parent remain distinct from those of the female parent. Inasmuch as each germ-cell, after THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 49 maturation, contains only half the characteristic num- ber of chromosomes, the original number is restored in fertilization. Significance of the Behavior of the Chromosomes. — The question confronts us as to what is the signifi- cance of this elaborate system which keeps the chro- mosomes of constant size, shape and number ; which partitions them so accurately in ordinary cell-divi- sions; and which provides for a reduction of their numbers by half in the germ-cell while yet securing that each mature gamete gets one of each kind of chromosome. Most biologists look on these facts as indicating that the chromosomes are specifically con- cerned in inheritance. In the first place it is recognized that as regards the definable characters which separate individuals of the same species, ofifspring may inherit equally from either parent. And it is a very significant fact that while the ovum and spermatozoon are very unequal in size them- selves, the chromosomes of the two germ-cells are of the same size and number. This parity in chromo- somal contribution points clearly to the means by which an equal number of character-determiners might be conveyed from each parent. Moreover it is mainly the nucleus of the sperm-cell in some organisms which enters the egg, hence the determiners from the male line must exist wholly or largely somewhere in the nucleus. And the bulk of the nucleus in the sperma- tozoon consists of the chromosomes or their products. A Single Set of Chromosomes Derived from One Parent Only Is Sufficient for the Production of a Complete Organism. — That a single or haploid set 50 BEING WELL-BORN of chromosomes as seen in the gametes is sufficient contribution of chromatin for the production of a complete organism is proved by the fact that the un- fertilized eggs of various animals (many echinoderms, worms, mollusks, and even the frog) may be artifi- cially stimulated to development without uniting at all with a spermatozoon. The resulting individual is normal in every respect except that instead of the usual diploid number it has only the single or haploid number of chromosomes. Its inheritance of course is wholly of maternal origin. The converse experiment in echinoderms in which a nucleus of male origin (that is, a spermatozoon) has been introduced into an egg from which the original nucleus has been removed shows that the single set of chromosomes carried by the male gamete is also sufficient to cooperate with the egg-cytoplasm in developing a complete individual. The Duality of the Body and the Singleness of the Germ. — Since every maternal chromosome in the ordinary cell has an equivalent mate derived from the male parent, it follows therefore, supposing the chromosomes do have the significance in inheritance attributed to them, that as regards the measurable in- heritable differences between two individuals, the ordinary organism produced through the union of the two germ-cells is, potentially at least, dual in nature. On the other hand through the process of reduction the gametes are provided with only a single set of such representatives. This duality of the body and singleness of the mature germ is one of the most strik- ing facts that come to light in embryology. How well the facts fit in with the behavior of certain heredi- THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 51 tary characters will be seen later in our discussions of Mendelism. The Cytoplasm Not Negligible in Inheritance. — Just what part is played by the cytoplasm in inheri- tance is not clear, but it is probably by no means a negligible one. The cytoplasm of a given organism is just as distinctive of the species or of the individual of which it forms a part as are the chromosomes. It is well established that neither nucleus nor cytoplasm can fuUy function or even exist long without the other, and neither can alone produce the other. They un- doubtedly must cooperate in building up the new indi- vidual, and the cytoplasm of the new individual is predominantly of maternal origin. It is obvious that all of the more fundamental characters which make up an organism, such, for instance, as make it an animal of a certain order or family, as a human being or a dog or a horse, are common to both parents, and there is no way of measuring how much of this fundamental constitution comes from either parent, since only closely related forms will interbreed. In some forms, moreover, the broader fundamental features of em- bryogeny are already established before the entrance of the spermatozoon. It is probable therefore that in- stead of asserting that the entire quota of characters which go to make up a complete individual are inher- ited from each parent equally, we are justified only in maintaining that this equality is restricted to those measurable differences which veneer or top off, as it were, the individual. We may infer that in the devel- opment of the new being the chromosomes of the egg together with those derived from the male work 52 BEING WELL-BORN jointly on or with the other germinal contents which are mostly cytoplasmic materials of maternal origin. The Chromosomes Possibly Responsible for the Distinctiveness of Given Characters. — It seems probable that in the establishment of certain basic fea- tures of the organism the cooperation of the cyto- plasm with chromatin of either maternal or paternal origin might accomplish the same end, but that cer- tain distinctive touches are added or come cumula- tively into expression through influences carried, pre- dominantly at least, in the chromatin from one as against the other parent. These last distinctive char- acters of the plant or animal constitute the individual differences of such organisms. In this connection it is a significant fact that in young hybrids between two distinct species the early stages of development, espe- cially as regards symmetry and regional specifications, are exclusively or predominantly maternal in charac- ter, but the male influence becomes more and more apparent as development progresses until the final degree of intermediacy is attained. From the evidence at hand this much seems sure, that the paternal and maternal chromosomes respect- ively carry substances, be they ferments, nutritive materials or what not, that are instrumental in giving the final parity of personal characters which we ob- serve to be equally heritable from either line of ances- try. It is clear that most of the characters of an adult organism can not be merely the outcome of any unitary substance of the germ. Each is the product of many cooperating factors and for the final outcome any one THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 53 cooperant is probably just as important in its way as any other. The individual characters which we juggle to and fro in our breeding experiments seem apexed, as it were, on more fundamental features of organic chemical constitution, polarity, regional differentiation, and physiological balance, but since such individual characters parallel so closely the visible segregations and associations which go on among the chromosomes of the germ-cells it would seem that they, at least, are represented in the chromosomes by distinctive coop- erants which give the final touch of specificity to those hereditary characters which can be shifted about as units of inheritance. Sex and Heredity. — Whatever the origin of fer- tilization may have been in the world of life, or what- ever its earliest significance, the important fact re- mains that to-day it is unquestionably of very great significance in relation to the phenomena of heredity. For in all higher animals, at least, offspring may pos- sess some of the characteristics originally present in either of two lines of ancestry, and this commingling of such possessions is possible only through sexual re- production. As has already been seen, in the pairing of chromosomes previous to reduction, the correspond- ing members of a pair always come together so that in the final segregation each gamete is sure to have one of each kind although whether a given chromosome of the haploid set is of maternal or paternal origin seems to be merely a matter of chance. Thus, for instance, if we arbitrarily represent the chromosomes of a given individual by ABC abc, and regard A, B 54 BEING WELL-BORN and C as of paternal and a, b and c as of maternal, origin, then in synapsis only A and a can pair together, B and b and C and c, but each pair operates inde- pendently of the other so that in the ensuing reduction division either member of a pair may get into a cell with either member of the other pairs. That is, the line up for division at a given reduction might be any one of the following, ^bc abc Abe Abc -p^js would ^' abc abC aBCaBc" yield the following eight kinds of gametes, ABC, abc, ABc, abC, Abc, aBC, AbC, aBc, each bearing one of each kind of chromosome required to cover the entire field of characters necessaiy to a com- plete organism. And since each sex would be equally likely to have these eight types of gametes and any one of the eight in one individual might meet any one of the eight of the other, the possible number of combinations in the production of a new individual from such germ-cells would be 8x8, or 64. With the larger numbers of chromosomes which exist in most animals it is readily seen that the num- ber of possible combinations becomes very great. Thus any individual of a species with twenty chromosomes — and many animals, including man, have more — • would have ten pairs at the reduction period and could therefore form (2)^°, or 1,024 different gametes in each sex. And since any one of these in one sex would have an equal chance of meeting with any one in the opposite sex, the total number of possible different zygotes that might be produced would be ( 1,024) ^ or 1,048,576. Sex therefore, through recombinations of ancestral materials, undoubtedly means, among other things, the production of great diversity in offspring. THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 55 DETERMINATION OF SEX Many Theories. — From earliest times the prob- lem of sex determination has been one of keen inter- est, and needless to say hundreds of theories have been propounded to explain it. Geddes and Thomson say that Drelincourt recorded two hundred sixty-two so-called theories of sex production and remark that since his time the number has at least been doubled. The desirability of controlling sex has naturally ap- pealed strongly to breeders of domesticated animals. A study of animals born in litters, or of twins, is enough in itself to make us skeptical of theories of sex-determination based on nutritional or external fac- tors. In a litter of puppies, for example, there are usually both males and females, although in their pre- natal existence they have all been subject to the same nutritional and environmental conditions. Likewise in ordinary human twins one may be a boy, the other a girl, whereas if the nutritional condition of the mother were the fact determining sex, both should be boys or both girls. However, there are twins known as identical twins who are remarkably alike and who are always of the same sex. But there is reason to 'suppose that identical twins in reality come from the same zygote. Presumably in early embryogeny, probably at the two- celled stage of cleavage, the two blastomeres become separated and each gives rise to a complete individual instead of only the half of one it would have produced had the two blastomeres remained together. Such twins are monochorial ; that is, they grow inside the same fetal membrane, whereas each ordinary twin has 56' BEING WELL-BORN its own fetal membrane and has obviously originated from a separate ovum. It has been established experi- mentally in several kinds of animals that early cleavage blastomeres when isolated can each develop into a com- plete individual. In man, ordinary twins are no more alike than ordinary brothers and sisters, but identical twins are strikingly similar in structure, appearance, habits, tastes, and even susceptibility to various mal- adies. The fact that they are invariably of the same sex is a strong reason for believing that sex was al- ready developed in the fertile ovum and consequently in the resulting blastomeres from that ovum. The young of the nine-banded armadillo in a given litter are invariably of the same sex and are closely similar in all features. Newman and Patterson have shown that all the members of a litter come from the same egg. Patterson has established the fact that cleavage of the egg takes place in the usual manner, but later separate centers of development appear in the early embryonic mass and give rise to the separate young individuals. Again in certain insects where one egg indirectly gives rise to a chain of embryos, or to a number of separate larvas, possibly as many as a thousand, all of the latter are of the same sex. Even in some plants researches have shown that sex is already determined at the beginning of development. Then, too, much evi- dence has come to light recently showing that sex-char- acters in certain cases behave as heritable characters and are independent of external conditions. Lastly there is visible and convincing evidence obtainable through microscopical observations that sex is deter- THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 57 mined by a mechanism in the germ-cells themselves. It is chiefly to these latter facts that I wish to direct attention for the present. The Sex Chromosome. — The evidence centers about a special chromosome or chromosome-group commonly designated as the sex-chromosome or X- element, which has been found in various species of animals, including man. In the males of such animals this chromosome is present in addition to the regular number of pairs, thus giving rise to an uneven instead of the conventional even number of chromosomes. This element remains undivided in one of the matura- tion divisions of the spermatocytes, in some forms in the first in others in the second, and passes entire to one pole of the spindle (Fig. 13, p. 58). This re- sults in the production of two classes of cells, one containing the X-element and one not. The outcome is that two corresponding classes of spermatozoa are produced. The phenomena involved are diagrammati- cally represented in Fig. 13. It has been clearly dem- onstrated in several cases that eggs fertilized by sper- matozoa which possess this X-element, always become females, those fertilized by spermatozoa which do not possess it always develop into males. It has been found, furthermore, that in species in which the males possess this extra element the fe- males have two of them. That is, if the original num- ber in the somatic cells of the male were twenty-three, twenty-two ordinary and one X-element, the number in the somatic cells of the fernale would be twenty- four, or twenty-two ordinary and two X-elements. It has been found that when the chromosomes of the fe- 58 BEING WELL-BORN male pair for the reduction division, each chromosome uniting with its corresponding fellow, the two X-ele- FiG. 13 Diagram illustrating the behavior of the ;t:-element or sex- chromosome in the maturation of the sperm-cell. In one oi the two maturation divisions (represented here as in the first) it passes undivided to one pole (a, b, c), in the other it divides. Since the cell without the x-element also divides the result is that ultimately from the original primary spermatocyte (a) four cells are formed (f), two with the jr-element and two without it. Half of the spermatozoa therefore will bear an ;t--element, half will be without it. In o the ordinary chromo- somes, arbitrarily indicated as 10, are supposed to have already paired for reduction so that the original diploid num- ber in spermatogonia and body-cells of the male would be 20 plus the ;f -chromosome. ments in the female pair in the usual way so that every egg-cell possesses an X-element. Thus every ma- THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 59 I lure egg has an X-element, while only half of the spermatozoa have one. That is, if we assume twenty- three as the diploid number present originally in the somatic cells of the male and twenty-four as the number in the female, then one-half the spermatozoa of the male would contain the haploid number eleven, and the other half, the number twelve, whereas every mature ovum would contain twelve. Since there are equal numbers of the spermatozoa with the X-element and without it, and inasmuch as presumably under ordinary conditions one kind is as likely to fertilize the egg as the other, then there are equal chances at fer- tilization of producing a zygote with two X-elements or with but one. Thus, Spermatozoon -)- X by Ovum -|- Jr= Zygote -\- XX. Spermatozoon (no X) by Ovum -\- X = Zygote -|- X. We have already seen that the former is always fe- male, the latter male. It thus becomes possible to distinguish the sex of an embryo by counting the chromosomes of its cells. This has been accomplished in several cases. In some instances* the conditions may be much * The reader desiring more detailed information will find fuller discussions in the following: Wilson, E. B. : Recent Researches on the Determination and Heredity of Sex. Science, January 8, 1909. Wilson, E. B. : The Chromosomes in Relation to the Determi- nation of Sex. Science Progress, April, 1910. Guyer, M. F. : Recent Progress in Some Lines of Cytology. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, April, 1911. Morgan, T. H. : Heredity and Sex. Columbia University Press, 1913. 60 BEING WELL-BORN more complex than the ones indicated — too complex in fact to warrant detailed discussion in an elemen- tary exposition — but the principle remains the same throughout, the very complexity when thoroughly un- derstood, strengthening rather than weakening the evidence. In a few forms an interesting reversal of conditions has been found in that the eggs instead of the spermatozoa show the characteristic dimorphism. Just what the exact relationship between sex-differ- entiation and the Z-element is has never been clearly established. It is possible that this element is an actual sex-determinant, in the ordinary cases one X-element determining the male condition and two X-elements producing the female condition. On the other hand it might be argued that it is not the deter- mining factor but the expression of other cell activi- ties which do determine sex ; that is, a sex accompani- ment. Or again, it may be one of several essential factors which must cooperate to determine sex. SEX-LINKED CHARACTERS The discovery of the remarkable behavior of certain characters in heredity which can only be plausibly ex- plained by supposing that they are linked with a sex- determining factor still further strengthens our belief in the existence of such a definite factor. Such char- acters are commonly termed sex-linked characters. Sex-Linked Characters in Man. — Since there are a number of them in man we may choose one of these, such as color-blindness, for illustration. The common form of color-bHndness known as Daltonism THE BEARERS OP THE HERITAGE 61 in which the subject can not distinguish reds from greens, a condition which seems to be due to the ab- sence of something which is present in individuals of normal color vision, is far commoner in men than in women. Its type of inheritance, sometimes termed "crisscross" heredity, has been likened to the knight moves in a game of chess. The condition is trans- mitted from a color-blind man through his daughter to half of her sons. Or, to go more into detail, a color- blind father and normal mother have only normal children whether sons or daughters. The sons con- tinue to have normal children but the daughters, although of normal vision themselves, transmit color- blindness to one-half of their own sons. If such a woman marries a color-blind man, as might easily hap- pen in a marriage between cousins, then as a rule one- half her daughters as well as one-half her sons will be color-blind. In such cases what appears to be a mysterious pro- cedure becomes very simple if we assume that the de- fective character is associated with the sex-determin- ing factor, or to make it concrete let us say with the X-element. The chart shown in Fig. 14, p. 62, indicates what the germinal condition would be under the cir- cumstances. The column to the right represents the ma- ternal, the one to the left the paternal line. Since two X means female and one X male, and inasmuch as we have assumed that the physical basis of the defect to which color-blindness is due is conveyed by the X- element, we may represent the defective single X of the male in outline only (see first row). It is obvious that after the reduction divisions (second row) the 02 BEING WELL-BORN Body-cells of grand- children Fig. 14 Diagram illustrating the inheritance of a sex-limited char- acter such as color-blindness in man on the assumption that the factor in question is located in the sex-chromosome (from Loeb after Wilson). The normal se:>i:-chromosome is indi- cated by a black X, the one lacking the factor for color per- ception, by a light X. It is assumed that a normal female is mated with a color-blind male. THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 63 mature sex-cells of the female will each contain a sin- gle normal X, the corresponding sex cells of the male will contain either no X or a defective X. Since if any member of the class of spermatozoa containing no X, fertilizes an egg the resulting zygote (row three) will have but one A' and that a normal one, the indi- vidual which develops from the zygote will be normal as regards color vision and moreover will be male be- cause the condition one X always means maleness. On the other hand, if any member of the class of sperma- tozoa containing the defective X fertilizes an egg two Z-elements are brought together and this of itself means femaleness. In this case one of the X-elements is defective but the single normal X is sufficient in itself to produce normal color vision. But when it comes to the maturation of the sex-cells of this female, the pair of X-elements are separated in the usual way with the result that half of the mature ova contain a normal X and half a defective X (row four). Since in a normal male, however, the mature reproductive cells will contain either a normal X or no X (fourth row), any one of four different kinds of matings may result. A sex-cell carrying normal X of the male may combine with an ovum containing normal X producing a normal female (row five). Or such a cell may com- bine with an ovum carrying the defective A', also pro- ducing a female but one who although of normal color vision herself, like her mother, is a carrier of the de- fect. On the other hand, any one of the spermatozoa without an X may combine with an ovum containing the normal X, in which case a normal male is pro- duced and, moreover, one who, like his mother's broth- 64 BEING WELL-BGRN ers, is incapable of transmitting the defect. However, the sperm-cell devoid of an X is just as likely to fer- tilize an ovum carrying the defective X, in which event the resulting individual, a male, must be color-blind because he contains the defective X alone. In other words, the chances are that one-half the sons of a woman whose father was color-blind will be color- blind, the other half perfectly normal; and that all of the daughters will be of normal color vision al- though one-half of them will probably transmit the de- fect to one-half of their sons. From a glance at the diagram it is readily seen also that a color-blind female could result from the union of a color-blind man (see first row) and the daughter of a color-blind man (see third row) . For half of the gametes of such a female would bear the defect as would also that half of the gametes of the male which carry X, hence the expecta- tion would be that half of the daughters of such a union would be color-blind and half would be carriers of color-blindness ; and that half of the sons would be color-blind and half normal. All the sons of a color- blind woman would be color-blind because she has only defective X-elements to pass on. The inheritance of various other conditions in man follows more or less accurately the same course as color-blindness. Among these may be mentioned : hemophilia, a serious condition in which the blood will not 'clot properly, thus rendering the afifected indi- vidual constantly liable to severe or fatal hemorrhage ; near-sightedness (myopia) in some cases ; a degenera- tive disease of the spinal cord known as multiple sclerosis; progressive atrophy of the optic nerve (neu- THE BEARERS OF THE HERITAGE 65 ritis optica); Gower's muscular atrophy; some forms of night-blindness; in some cases ichthyosis, a peculiar scaly condition of the skin. In one of my own tabula- tions of a case of inheritance of "webbed" digits or syndactyly, a condition in which two or more fingers or toes are more or less united, a sex-linked inheritance is clearly indicated (Fig. 15), although from the pedi- ■o □ J n-r<) i □ Fig. 15 ^ -o Chart showing the inheritance of a case of syndactyly after the manner of a sex-linked character. The affected in- dividuals are represented in black ; squares indicate males, circles females. The condition is seen to be inherited by males through unaffected females. grees recorded by other investigators this condition usually appears in some of both the sons and daugh- ters of an affected individual. The Occurrence of Sex-Linkage in Lower Forms Renders Experiments Possible. — The course fol- lowed by such characters in man can be inferred only from the pedigrees we can obtain from family his- 66 BEING WELL-BORN tories. Fortunately, however, such sex-linkage also occurs in lower animals and we are able therefore to verify and extend our observations by direct experi- ments in breeding. Several sex-linked characters have been found to exist in a small fruit-fly known as Drosophila. Extensive breeding experiments with this fly by Professor T. H. Morgan and his pupils have borne out remarkably the interpretation that the char- acters in question are really linked with a sex-deter- mining factor. CHAPTER III MENDELISM New Discoveries in the Field of Heredity. — Writ- ing in 1899, one of America's well-known zoologists asserts that, "It is easier to weigh an invisible planet than to measure the force of heredity in a single grain of corn." And yet only two or three years later we find another prominent naturalist saying regarding heredity that, "The experiments which led to this ad- vance in knowledge are worthy to rank with those that laid the foundation of the atomic laws of chemistry.'' Again, "The breeding pen is to us what the test-tube is to the chemist — an instrument whereby we examine the nature of our organisms and determine em- pirically their genetic properties." Here is a decided contrast of statement and yet both were justifiable at the time of utterance. For even at the writing of the first statement the investigations were in progress which, together with the rediscovery of certain older work, were to transfer our knowledge of heredity from the realm of speculation to that of experiment and disclose certain definite principles of genetic trans- mission. Through a knowledge of these principles in fact, the shifting of certain characters is reducible to a series of definitely predictable proportions and the skilled breeder may proceed to the building up of new and 67 68 BEING WELL-BORN permanent combinations of- desirable characters ac- cording to mathematical ratios and, what is of equal importance, he can secure the elimination of unde- sirable qualities. While there are many limitations in the application of these principles and while new facts and modifications are constantly being discovered con- cerning them, nevertheless they represent the first ap- proximations to definite laws of hereditary transmis- sion that we have ever been able to make, and the practical fact confronts us that whatever our theoreti- cal interpretations may be, the principles are so definite that through their application important improvements of crops and domesticated animals have already ac- tually been secured and one may confidently expect still others to follow. Mendel. — The principles involved are called the Mendelian principles after their discoverer, Gregor Johann Mendel, abbot of a monastery at Briinn, Aus- tria. After eight years of patient experimenting in his cloister garden with plants, chiefly edible peas, he published his resillts and conclusions in 1866, in the Proceedings of the Natural History Society of Briinn. While known to a few botanists of that day, the full importance of the contribution was not recognized, and in the excitement of the post-Darwinian controversy, the facts were lost sight of and ultimately forgotten. Rediscovery of Mendelian. Principles. — In 1900 three men, Correns, De Vries and Tschermak, work- ing independently — in different countries, in fact — re- discovered the principles and called attention anew to the long-forgotten work of Mendel which they had come upon in looking over the older literature on plant MENDELISM 69 breeding. These investigators added other examples from their own experiments. Since their rediscovery the principles have been confirmed in essential features and extended by numerous experimentalists with re- gard to a wide range of hereditary characters in both animals and plants. Independence of Inheritable Characters. — It has been found that many truly heritable characteristics or traits of an individual, whether plant or animal, are comparatively independent of one another and may be inherited independently. Where there are contrasted characters in father and mother, such as white plumage and black plumage in fowls, smooth coat and wrinkled coat in seed, horns and hornlessness in cattle, long fur and short fur in rabbits, beard and beardlessness in wheat, albino condition and normal condition, etc., there is obviously a bringing together of the deter- miners of the two traits in the resulting offspring. In the third generation, however, in the progeny of these offspring, the two distinct characters may be set apart again, thus showing that in the second generation while perhaps one only was visible, the factors which determine both were nevertheless present, and more- over, they were present in a separable condition. Illustration of Mendelism in the Andalusian Fowl. — Let us take as a simple example the case of the An- dalusian fowl. Although it is not a case established by Mendel it illustrates certain of the essential condi- tions underlying Mendelism in a more obvious way than the cases worked out by Mendel himself. The so- called blue Andalusian fowl results from a cross of a color variety of the fowl which is black with one which 70 BEING WELL-BORN is white with black-splashed feathers. The result is the same irrespective of which parent is black. When bred with their like, whether from the same parents or different parents, these blue fowls produce three kinds of progeny, approximately one-fourth of which are black like the one grandparent, one-fourth white like >^ X^ y X ^ X X ^ f yy #f'¥ Fig. 16 Diagram showing ttie scheme of inheritance in the blue Andalusian fowl. the other grandparent, and the remaining half, blue like the parents (Fig. 16). Moreover, the black fowls obtained in this way will, when interbred, produce only black offspring and the same is true of the white fowls. To all appearances as far as color is concerned they are of as pure type as the original grandparents. With the blue fowls, however, the case is different, for when bred together they will produce the same three MENDELISM 71 kinds of progeny that their parents produced and in the same proportions. Again the white and the black are true to type but the blue will always yield the three classes of offspring and this through generation after generation. These facts may be illustrated graphically as fol- lows where the word "black" indicates the original black parent, "white" the original white (black splashed) parent and "blue" the hybrid offspring. Parental Generation (P) First Filial Generation (F I ) Black X White Black X White Blue X I Blu Second Filial Black Generation (Fj) {25%) Blue (50%) White (25%) Third Filial Generation (F3) I Black Black (25%) I Blue (50%) White White (25%) I I i I I , Fourth Filial Black Black Black Blue White White White Generation (F J (25%) (50%) (25%) The Cause of the Mendelian Ratio. — Concerning the cause of this peculiar ratio of inheritance in crossed forms Mendel suggested a simple explana- tion. Animals or plants that can be cross-bred, obvi- ously must be forms that produce a new individual from the union of two germ-cells, one of which is provided by each parent. Mendel's idea was that there must be some process of segregation going on in the developing germ-cells of each hybrid whereby the factors for the two qualities are set apart in differ- 72 BEING WELL-BORN ent cells with the result that half of the germ-cells of a given individual will contain the determiner of one character and half, the determiner of the other. That is, a given germ-cell carries a factor for one or the other of the two alternate characters but not the fac- tors for both. In a plant, for example, in the male line, half of the pollen grains would bear germ-cells carrying the determiner of one character and half, that of the other. Similarly, in the female line, half of the ovules would contain the determiner of the one character and half, that of the other. Likewise in an- imals as regards such pairs of characters there would be two classes of germ-cells in the male and two in the female. In the case of the blue Andalusian fowls under discussion this would mean that half of the mature germ-cells of the male carry the black-produc- ing factor, and half carry the white-producing factor, and the same is true of the germ-cells of the female. Thus when two such crossed forms are mated, there are, by the laws of chance, four possible combinations, namely : ( 1 ) white-determining sperm-cells and white- determining ovum ; (2) white-determining sperm-cells and black-determining ovum; (3) black-determining sperm-cells and white-determining ovum; and (4) black-determining sperm-cells and black-determining ovum. Manifestly, the first combination can only give white offspring; the second, white and black, gives blue (by such a cross the original blues were estab- lished) ; likewise, the third, black and white, gives blue; and the fourth combination can only give black offspring. This matter may be graphically represented by the following formulae in which B indicates the MENDELISM 73 determiner of Black in the germ-cell and W the de- terminer of White: $ signifies male; 9 female. IN THE ORIGINAL PARENTS W X B = WB = Blue IN THE HYBRIDS 3 9 WX W = WW = White W X B == W B = Blue B XW=BW = Blue B X B = B B = Black Thus of the four possible combinations one only can produce white fowls, two (WB or BW) can pro- duce blue fowls, and one black fowls. That is, the ratio is 1 :2:1 or the 25, SO and 25 per cent., respect- ively, of our diagram. The black fowls or the white fowls will breed true in subsequent generations when mated with those of their own color because the de- terminer of the alternative character has been per- manently eliminated from their germ-plasm ; but the blue fowls will always yield three types of offspring because they still possess the two classes of germ- cells. Verification of the Hypothesis. — The hypothesis that germ-cells of crossed forms are of two classes with respect to a given pair of Mendelian characters is further substantiated by the following facts. If in the case of the fowls under discussion one of the blue fowls is mated with an individual of the white variety, 74- BEING WELL-BORN half of the progeny will be blue and half white. For the hybrid has two kinds of germ-cells, black pro- ducing, which we have designated by the letter B, and white producing (or W) in equal number while the white parent has only one kind, white producing. It is obvious that if half the germ-cells of the hybrid form are of the type B then half the progeny will be of the BW type, which is blue, and the other half will be of the WW type, which is white. In the same way if we mate a hybrid and a black fowl, half of the progeny will be black and half will be blue, that is, there could only be WB and BB types. The fact must not be lost sight of that since the pairings are wholly determined by the laws of chance the proportions are likely to be only approximate. It is obvious that the greater the number of individuals, the nearer the results will approach the expected ratio. DOMINANT AND RECESSIVE One Character May Mask the Other. — In a large number of cases, however, the actual condition of af- fairs is not so evident as in the Andalusian fowl, for instead of being intermediate or different in appear- ance, the generation produced by crossing resemble? one parent to the exclusion of the other. Such an overshadowing is spoken of as dominance, and the two characters are termed dominant and recessive. Thus when brown ring-doves and white ring-doves are mated the progeny are all brown, or if wild gray mice are mated to white mice the progeny are all gray. So black is dominant to white in rose-comb bantams ; brown eyes to blue eyes in man ; beardless- MENDELISM 75 ness to beard in wheat, and likewise rough chaff to smooth, and thick stem to thin; tallness to dwarfness in various plants; normal condition to the peculiar waltzing condition in the Japanese waltzing mouse. Numerous other cases might be cited but these are sufficient to illustrate the condition. Segregation in. the Next Generation. — But now the question arises, what do such crosses as show dom- :>< o m^ X ay X X ciixl^Gy Fig. 17 Diagram showing the scheme of inheritance in guinea- pigs when black and albino forms are crossed. inance transmit to the next generation ? Experi- ments show regarding any given pair of these alternate characters that they are set apart again in the suc- ceeding generation, returning in a definite percentage to the respective grandparental types. Dominance Illustrated in Guinea-Pigs. — In guinea- pigs for example (Fig. 17), when an individual (either male or female) of a black variety, is crossed with 76 BEING WELL-BORN one of a white variety, the F^ generation are all black like the black parent. When these are interbred or bred with other blacks which have had one black and one white parent, only two visible types of progeny appear, viz., black and white, and these approximately in the ratio of three to one. Analysis by further breeding shows, however, that there are in reality three types, but since dominance is complete the pure extracted dominant and the mixed dominant-and-recessive type are indistinguishable to our eye. That is, while the blacks are three times as numerous as the whites, two out of every three of these blacks are really hybrid and correspond to the blue fowls of our former example. The condition is readily comprehended when ex- pressed diagrammatically thus : Generation P Black X White Black X White Generation Fj Black (White) X Black (White) \ . I ■ I 1 Generation F 2 1 Black 2 Black (White) 1 White In other words, the germ-cells of the one original parent (Gen. P) would contain only determiners for black and that of the other parent would contain only determiners for white. The condition of the individ- uals produced by the cross would be represented by the formula B(W). But these determiners segregate in the germ-cells of the crossed form, whether it be male or female, into B and W. Hence half the sper- matozoa of the male hybrid (generation Fj) would carry the B determiners and half the W determiners. MENDELISM n The same is true of the mature ova of the female hybrid. Consequently, in mating there are always four equally possible combinations, viz., BB, B(W), (W)B, and WW. Since B is always dominant three out of the four matings would yield black individuals, or in other Virords the ratio would be 3 :1. The pure blacks when mated together will breed true in subsequent generations, likewise the whites, but the blacks carrying white as a recessive will yield when interbred the same ratio of whites and black as did their hybrid parents (Fig. 17, p. 75). Terminology. — As work in the study of Men- delian inheritance has progressed and expanded the need of a more precise terminology has become evident and such is gradually being established. Thus Pro- fessor Bateson has coined the term "allelomorph" (Gk. one another, and form) to express more exactly what we have thus far been calling a pair of alternate or opposite characters. In the blue Andalusian fowls discussed, the white condition in the one parent is the allelomorph of the black condition in the other. The term generally means one of the pair of Mendelian characters themselves as expressed in the individual plants or animals but when the germinal basis of such phenomena is under discussion, it is sometimes used to refer to the determiners of such characters. And by determiner is meant simply the condition which is necessary in the germ to bring about the occurrence of a definite character. For example, when we are studying a cross between a red flower and a white flower with reference to the color factors, the differ- ence between the two plants may lie in the fact that 78 BEING WELL-BORN one produces a red coloring matter and the other does not. That is, the determiner for red is absent from the white variety. What the exact relation of color production is to the parts of the germ-cell we do not know. It could be the function of a single definite body or the resultant of several cooperating bodies. The latter is far more likely to be the case. We may suppose that a group of cooperating substances func- tion to produce red in the red flower but that in the white flowers one of these bodies is absent or fails to perform its red-producing function. It is customary where practicable to refer to the determiner of a character by the initial letter of the name of the character. The letter when written as a capital indicates the determiner but when written as a small letter the absence of the determiner. Thus R may be taken to represent the determiner for red col- oring matter and r its absence. It is convenient also to have a brief symbol to denote a given generation and for this purpose Bateson has introduced the sym- bol Fj for the hybrid progeny of the first cross, the initial letter of the word "filial." Fg would indicate the next generation, F3 the third and so on. Likewise P denotes the original parent generation. The Theory of Presence and Absence. — Many, if not all, allelomorphs consist of the presence and ab- sence respectively of a given determiner. In such cases the character represented' by the presence of the deter- miner is dominant over the character represented by the absence of a determiner. Thus in the crosses from the wild gray mice and albino mice the progeny are all gray mice since one parent had the determiner or MENDELISM. 79 group of determiners for grayness and the hybrid off- spring must also possess it. Likewise the presence of black in black guinea-pigs is dominant to its absence in albino guinea-pigs and the resulting progeny are all black. However, it has already been mentioned that beard- lessness in wheat is dominant to beard and that the ab- sence of horns in cattle is dominant to their presence, that is, the progeny of hornless by horned cattle are without horns except for occasional traces of imper- fect horns. Facts like these would seem at first sight to contradict the assertion just made that presence is dominant to absence, but it is fairly well established that in such cases one is not dealing with true ab- sences but with suppressions. The polled breeds of cattle, for example, are hornless not because of the absence of determiners for horns but because of the presence of an additional inhibiting factor which pre- vents these determiners from functioning. The horned breeds are without this inhibitor. When horned and hornless individuals are crossed the presence of the inhibitor from one line of ancestry is sufficient to sup- press the development of horns in the progeny. A similar explanation would, of course, apply to beard- lessness in wheat. In writing double-lettered formulae to denote the de- terminers of characters in hybrids the condition is represented merely by the capital and small letter. Thus Rr indicates that red is dominant to its absence. Additional Terminology. — In pure breeds where the determiners are alike as BB in black or bb in al- bino guinea-pigs, the individual is said to be a homo- 80 BEING WELL-BORN zygote (like things united) with reference to that character, while in those in which the determiners are unlike, as Bb, the individual is termed a heterosygote (unlike things united) with reference to the character.. Or to use the adjective forms, a pure black guinea-pig is homozygous for black pigment, an albino guinea- pig is homozygous for absence of pigment, while a cross between the two is heterozygous for pigment. Also, where the determiner of a given character is present in double quantity, that is, from both lines of ancestry, the individual is said to be duplex, where represented in only the single form as in heterozygous individuals, simplex, and where the determiner is ab- sent entirely, nulliplex, with reference to the charac- ter in question. Thus black guinea-pigs of formula BB are duplex with regard to the determiner for black color, individuals of formula Bb are simplex with reference to this determiner, and those of formula bb are nulliplex. A heterozygote in which dominance prevails can be identified with certainty by breeding to a known recessive and noting the kind of offspring produced. If the individual was really a heterozygote, approx;- mately fifty per cent, of the offspring should be of the recessive type. Dominance Not Always Complete.-^As a matter of fact close inspection shows that in numerous in- PP> ^°<^ PP' °^ one-fourth p,--^ p duplex brown, one-half simplex brown, and one-fourth blue or gray. If both parents have blue or gray eyes they can not have children with black or brown eyes, since the re- cessive condition in each parent means total absence of brown pigment in both. If one pair is duplex brown and the other blue, then all children will have brown eyes but of sirnplex type. If one parent has simplex brown eyes (type Pp) and one blue (pp) then one-half of the children will have broA^n eyes of simplex type and one-half will have blv ; eyes. Occa onal objections have been raised against the Mende' tn interpretation of inheritance in eye-color, but th , cases cited in evidence against the theory usually narrow down to those in which the color is so diluted as to render classification uncertain. For ex- ample, hazel eyes are sometimes called gray; they be- long however to the melanic pigmented type although the brown pigment may be much diluted and occur mainly around the pupil. So-called green eyes are due to yellow pigment on a blue background. In the rare cases where in the same individual one eye is brown and the other blue, the individual should prob- ably be rated as brown-eyed on the supposition that in the one eye the development of brown pigment has in some way been suppressed. MENDELISM IN MAN 105 Hair-Color. — The inheritance of hair-color has also been the subject of considerable study and while the conditions are not so simple as in the case of eye-color, there is little doubt that it belongs in the Mendelian category. In human hair, color has as its founda- tion apparently two pigments, black and red. Ab- sence of one or both or various combinations or dilutions of these seemingly account for the prevailing colors in human hair. In general dark hair is dominant to light, although because of the delay sometimes in the darkening of the hair in children this fact is often obscured. Black is dominant to red. People with glossy black hair, according to Davenport, are prob- ably simplex for black, the glossiness being due usually to recessive red. The expectation would be for some of the children of such a pair to have red hair. In man occasionally a congenital white lock contrast- ing strikingly with the remaining normally pigmented hair occurs. It behaves as a simple dominant in he- redity. Hair-Shape. — Again, straight and curly hair seem to be distinct inheritable characters. Curly is incom- pletely dominant to straight, the simplex condition yielding wavy hair. Not to enter into details of the matings, statistics gathered by Mr. and Mrs. Davenport show that, two- flaxen-haired parents have flaxen-haired children ; two golden-haired parents have only golden-haired chil- dren ; two parents with light brown hair have children with hair of that color or lighter, but never darker; two parents each with dark brown or black hair may have children with all the varieties of hair-color. Sum- 106 BEING WELL-BORN ming together a series of recessives Davenport points out that two blue-eyed, flaxen or golden and straight- haired parents will have only children like themselves. Irregularities. — If a dominant trait or defect de- pends on more than a single factor, as is sometimes the case, or if it is modified by sex or other condi- tions, as is true of certain characters, some of which, such as color-blindness, have already been examined, then we shall find some apparently non-affected indi- viduals having affected offspring. Certain diseases. I n III IV I _J_ J._L__Li Li _L_L Fig. 21 Diagram showing descent of brachydactyly through five generations ; black symbols indicate affected individuals ; $, male; S, female (after Farabee). for example, are generally transmitted by affected members of the family to their children in the ex- pected Mendelian ratio for a dominant, yet an occa- sional skip of a generation may appear in which an apparently perfectly normal individual transmits to his children what, except for the omission in his own case, appears to be an ordinary dominant character. MENDELISM IN MAN 107 This occasional lapse in the appearance of a character when theoretically it should appear is doubtless due in some instances to the fact that what is really in- herited is a tendency, and although this is present in the apparently normal individual, for some reason the condition itself has not appeared. This might espe- cially be true in the case of a disease which does not manifest itself until late in life. In other cases there are undoubtedly complicating accessory conditions which modify the behavior of the trait somewhat. OTHER CASES OF DOMINANCE IN MAN Among other normal characters in man, as far as available evidence goes, dark skin is dominant to light skin ; normally pigmented condition to albino ; and nervous temperament to phlegmatic. Digital Malformations. — An interesting and easily followed defect is a condition known as brachydacty- lism, in which the digits are shortened because of the absence or rudimentary condition of one segment. The fingers, therefore, appear to be only two- jointed like the thumb. Several families showing this defect have been charted and it appears to behave as a typi- cal dominant. In looking over such a chart (Fig. 21, p. 106) one is struck by the fact that only half of the children from most of the matings show the defect, but when we recall that the affected parent, after the first generation, probably carried the condition in only the simplex form and married a normal individual, such a result is just what would be expected (sec for- mula 2). 108 BEING WELL-BORN Polydactylism (Figs. 22, 23, pp. 109, 110) is a con- dition in which there are extra digits on hands or feet. The character, with apparently slight exceptions in a few records, behaves as a typical dominant. Among other digital defects which are inherited as a dominant is a condition known as syndactylism (Fig. 24, p. Ill), in which two or more digits are fused side by side. For an example of syndactyly which seems to be in the class of sex-linked characters, see Fig. 15, p. 65. Eye Defects. — Congenital cataract is another not uncommon defect in man which is transmitted as a dominant (Fig. 25, p. 112) with occasional irregulari- ties. It is a condition of opacity of the lens of the eye which produces partial or total blindness. In a paper on Hereditary Blindness and Its Prevention, Clarence Loeb (1909) mentions 304 families of which pedigrees have been published. Of the 1,012 children in these families 589, or 58 per cent., were affected. It is obvious that this is near the expected percentage in the case of a dominant trait where matings of af- fected with normal individuals prevailed. An unfor- tunate circumstance about this malady from the eu- genic standpoint is the fact that it is frequently of the presenile form which comes on late in life so that it is usually impossible to predict whether an individual of marriageable age is immune or will later become affected. Another defect of the eye following the course of a dominant in heredity is a pigmentary degeneration of the retina known as retinitis pigmentosa. Atrophy of the optic nerve is also involved and the final result is blindness. Still another example frequently cited is MENDELISM IN MAN 109 Fig. 22 Radiograph (Courtesy of Dr. W. B. Helm) showing Poly- dactyly in a child's hand. For genealogy of this see t\g. i.i, p. 110. no BEING WELL-BORN that of hereditary night bhndness (hemeralopia), a disease in which the affected person can not see by any but the brightest hght. In most affected famihes the final outcome is usually total blindness. One of the I n m GZ" Y Fig. 23 Chart showing a history of polydactylism tlirough five gen- erations in the B family. The individual whose hand is pictured in Fig. 22, p. 109, is of the fifth generation. Squares represent males, circles females. most remarkable pedigrees of defects in man ever collected is one of this disease published by Nettleship. He succeeded in tracing the defect through nine gen- erations, back to the seventeenth century. The gene- alogy includes 2,116 persons. The character behaves as a single dominant in males, but frequently, though MENDELISM IN MAN 111 Fig. 24 Radiograph (Courtesy of Dr. W. B. Helm) showing a partial syndactyly in each hand of an individual. Some de- gree of webbing between the more distal portions of the af- fected parts is usilal. 112 BEING WELL-BORN not always, females may be carriers of the defect in transmissible form though not exhibiting it them- selves. That is, males in which the condition is sim- plex (Aa) develop the defect but females of similar simplex constitution (Aa) frequently do not. It fol- lows, therefore, that normal males of such strains will A '■f?f»$fff!l