■m:^ \T- \ i v>^^^ ■ ■' ■■■4^* 1 r/*> 1 ^■|i^«E ...Jt:/ H J n48^ By ' -m-in m ^ ,:C^>.V^;y THE MARTIN P. CATHERWOOD LIBRARY OF THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY REPORT ON STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN <: AN AD a" 1901-1916 Published by the Department of Labour. OTTAWA i J.®E LABROQUERIETACHfi - ./^ PRINTER TO THE KING'S MOS+ BXCiELLENT MaI^ST-Y 1918 THE LIBRARY OF THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY REPORT ON STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA 1901-1916/ Published by the Department of Labour OTTAWA ' J. DE LABROQUERIB TACHfi PRINTER TO THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 1918 28163—1 LL. hTins'i To the Hon. T. W. OrotheeS, B.A., K.C., Minister of Labotir. Sir, — I tave tlie honour to submit a report on Strikes and Lockouts iia Canada, bringing to the close of the calendar year, 1916, the information collected and, com- piled by the Department on this subject. I have the honour to be, sir, Your obedient servant, F. A. ACLAISTD, Deputy Minister of Labour. Ottawa, August, 1917. Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924050075872 CONTENTS. Page. 1. General Summary - ^ 2. Review of the Five-year Periods, 1901-1905, 1906-1910, and 1911-1915 15 3. Important Disputes in the Period 1911-1916 19 4. Details of Industrial Disputes in the Period 1911-1915 26 a. Tables of Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915 65 I. By Provinces 66 II. By Industries 68 III. By Numbers of Employees Involved VO IV. By Time Loss '- . 72 V. By Industries and Duration 74 VI.. By Causes and Results 78 VII. By Methods of Settlement 82 6. Tables of Industrial Disputes, 1901-1915 87 VIII. By Provinces. 88 IX. By Industries 91 X. By Numbers of Employees Involved 94 XI. By Time- Loss 96 XII. By Industries and Duration 100 XIII. By Causes and Results. . . ^ 106 7. Tables of Industrial Disputes in Other Countries 113 XIV. Canada and Other Countries 114 XV. Australia 116 XVI. Austria 118 XVII. Belgium 120 I XVIII. Prance 122 XIX. Germany 123 XX. Holland 125 XXI. Italy 127 XXII, Spain 129 XXIII. Sweden 131 XXIV. United Kingdom 133 XXV. United States 138 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916. 1. GENERAL SUMMARY. This volume contains information collected in the Department of Labour to the close of the calendar year, 1916, with respect to strikes apd lockouts in Canada. In the report on this subject for the period, 1901-1912, issued in 1913, it was indicated that the department planned to issue similar reports periodically, supplementary to the statements on industrial disputes appearing in the Labour Gazette and in the Annual Eeport of the Department. The earlier report gave special attention to the quin- quennial periods, 1901-1905 and 1906-1910, and the present volume gives special tables- for the succeeding quinquennium. Comparisons are made with the statistics of indus- trial disputes for the periods 1901-1905 and 1906-1910, and in addition a brief survey is given of industrial disputes during the sixteen years covered by the departmental record. Throughout the report, unless stated otherwise, the figures as 'to the number of disputes and the employers and employees affected are those of disputes in existence in the year. As usually a few disputes are caj-ried forward each year, in the total for any period of years a small number of disputes and the numbers of employers and employees affected by them are counted more than once. The time, loss in each dispute is an estimate of the number of " men days " lost. It is ascertained by mtdtiplying the number of working days in which the industry was idle by the number of employees involved in the dispute. In the period 1901-1916 tljere were 1,594 strikes, which involved '9,430 employers, 398,391 employees and a time loss estimated at 10,920,539 working days. Perhaps the outstanding feature of the record is the comparatively slight industrial disturbance in Canada since the outbreak of the war. Disputes in progress when war began in August, 1914, were soon adjusted ; only seven disputes occurred in the period from August 1 to December 31, 1914, and less than 300 employees were affected. In 1915 there were forty-three strikes affecting 9,140 employees, and causing a time loss of 106,149 days— the smallest amount of disturbance from the standpoints of number of disputes, time loss and percentage of the total population involved ever ■ recorded. Although in 1916 the number of disputes increased to seventy-five, the year stands third in the record as to minimum of trouble. In 1911-1915, the five years with which the report deals most closely, the number of disputes — 449 — was lower than in either of the two pre- vious quinquennial periods. The number of employees affected— 12Y,959 — shows a slight increase over the figures for the two previous periods — 126,179 in 1906-1910, and 123,096 in 1901-1905— but the time loss of 4,969,739 days was muct the heaviest of the three five-year periods. DEPAETMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table 1. — Industrial Disputes, 1911-15. Industry or Occupation. Fishing.' liumbering Mining and quarrying Building trades Metal and shipbuilding trades Woodworking trades Printing and allied trades . . . Textile trades Clothing trades Food, liquors and tobacco . . . Leather trades . . . . , General transport Miscellaneous trades Unskilled labour Total Number of Disputes. 3 7 29 128 103 6 4 » 5] 15 3 39 32 20 449 Number of Firms Involved. 37 35 103 1,655 298 50 42 9 156 55 4 145 158 33 2,780 Number of Employees Affected. 2,750 2,825 26,231 26,507 13,763 690 329 2,478 21,454 1,176 80 12,553 2,019 15,104 127,959 Time Loss in Working Days. 55,000 141,570 2,570,688 557,194 237,022 31,377 4,605 27,090 587,739 31,722 2,570 212, t39 35,073 475,950 4,969,739 COMPARISON WITH PRECEDING PERIODS. From the standpoint of the number of disputes, industrial unrest in the period 1911-15, was greatest in the building, metal, clothing and transportation trades in the order named, and it is noteworthy that this order prevails throughout the three quin- quennial periods (Table II). Time loss, however, was greatest in mining, in which industry 51.7 per cent of the time loss was recorded. The clothing trade stood second with 11.8 per cent, and building third with 11-2 per cent; in each of the other two periods building took second place. The time loss in raining and lumbering shows marked increases throughout the three periods, and there is also a steady increase in time loss in the metals group, although this is probably not disproportionate to the expansion of the industries of that class. The unskilled labour group shows a decided increase in the last quinquennium, and in this period, also, the time loss in the foods and tobaccos group was much heavier than in either of the two previous periods. In the building, woodworking, printing, and miscellaneous groups the time loss in the last period was greater than in the second but less than in the first. The figures of time loss for 1911-16 in the textile, leather, and general transportation groups diminished. The mining industry has contributed a constantly increasing share of the country's industrial unrest, aboijt twenty-five per cent of the total time loss being chargeable to this industry in the first quinquennium as against approximately forty-seven per cent and fifty-one per cent in the periods 1906-10 and 1911-15, respectively. Mining apart, the volume of industrial unrest, as measured by time loss, shows a decline in the second quinquennium and the increase in the third period is greatly reduced. (See pag;e 16). Coal mining, to which, of course, is due most of the time loss in the mining industry, is also responsible for a large share of the total industrial unrest as is shown by the accompanying chart. I DISTRIBUTION BY PRWINCES. The record of the distribution of strikes or lockouts among the provinces during the period 1911-15, places Ontario, the most populous province, in the lead with 43-4: per cent of the total number (Table I). Quebec ranking , second with 16-7 per cent. Measured by working days lost, however, the economic disturbance was greatest in British Columbia, that province recording 35 per cent of the total time loss. Inter- provincial disputes caused 28-9 per cent of the time loss, and disputes in Ontario, which province' ranked third from this standpoint, caused 13-6 per cent of the time loss. ?0 ^ 0» 09 ?j 4^ a> 00 r^ y^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ISO J ( 9o;^ 1903 19 04 / (905 1906 1 907 1908 1909 /9>0 /9f 1 /9I2 1913 1914 1915 1 916 1 1 % 1 ~~ -- ■ 1 1 VOs ^ ^ - ^ 1 / 1 1 \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ 1 f \ 1 1 1 1 ^ \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 ^ L / i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 % sv ^ - i^ STfJ ^ 1 1 i 1 1 i i !^ % S ^^ z ^ iii ^ 1 1 1 1 ^ !«>■ \ \. 1 i ^ ^ ^ ^i^ JP> ^ - - " -y* 1 / / / 1 \ h— • ' JO JO ^ a> cx> o jv» .^i o> o> o 10 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table 2. — Eecord of Labour Disputes by Years. Number of Disputes. Disputes in Existence In the Year. Year. In Exist- ence in the Year. 1 Beginning in the Year. Employers Involved. Employees Involved. Time loss in working days. Per cent ratio of No. Employees involved to Total Population. 1901 104 121 146 99 89 141 149 68 69 84 99 150 113 44 43 75 104 121 146 99 88 141 144 65 ' 68 82 96 148 106 40 , 38 74 273 420 927 575 4.37 1,015 825 175 397 1,335 475 989 1,015 205 96 271 28,086 12,264 50,041 16,482 16,223 26,050 36,624 25,293 17,332 21,280 30,094 40,511 39,536 8,678 9,140 21,157 398,391 632,311 120,940 1,226,500 - 265,004 217,244 359,797 621,962 708,285 871,845 718,635 2,046,650 1,099,208 1,287,678 430,054 106,149 208,277 !>2 1902 1903 1904 1905 22 88 28 190S 1907 1908 1909 42 57 39 26 1910 1911 31 42 1912 1913 1914 1915 54 51 11 11 1916.... •m Total 1,594 1,560 9,430 10,920,539 MAGNITUDE OF DISPUTES. The great majority of the disputes concern comparatively small numbers of employees. In 61 per cent of the disputes in the period 1911-1915, less than one hun- dred employees were involved (table III). There were 10 disputes in which the time loss was 100,000 days or upwards, and these disputes accounted for almost 70 per cent of the total time- loss for the period (table IV). The majority of the disputes were also of short duration; almost 30 per cent of the disputes in the period 1911-1915 existed for less than five days and 57 per cent endured not more than twenty days (table V). Disputes, in this period were of greatest duration in building and mining, in which industries 18.7 and 17-3 per cent of the disputes, respectively continued longer than thirty days. CAUSES AND RESULTS. The majority of the disputes in the period 1911-1915 were due to questions of wages and hours, about 70^ per cent of the disputes and 63 per cent of the time loss being due to this cause. TJiree per cent of the disputes and 20-7 per cent of the time loss were due to demands for recognition of the union, and 2-2 per cent of the strikes and 5.2 per cent of the time loss were on accoxint of sympathetic strikes (table V.) As to the results of the disputes, 139 or 30 per cent resulted in favour of the employees, 164, or 36 per cent in favour of the employers, ' 79 or 17 per cent were compromised and in 67 cases the result was indefinite (table VI.) METHODS OP SETTLEMENT. Direct negotiations between the parties or their representatives ranks first as a method of settlement, 196 of the 449 disputes having, been settled in this way. (Table STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 1 1 VII). Thirty-one disputes were settled by conciliation or mediation, 3 by arbitration and 5 by reference to a board under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act; in 104 cases the employees returned to work on the employers' terms and in 40 cases the dispute was settled by replacement of the workpeople; in 70 cases the dispute was settled otherwise, or there was no settlement, or the settlement was indefinite or not reported. ' SURVEY OF THE SIXTEEN-YEAR PERIOD 1901-191G, The factors which determine the causes and duration of disputes are found in a measure in the general economic situation of the country. The accompanying chart indicates that the percentage of strikes in each year in which the demands for increased wages and shorter hours were dominant causes rises or falls, generally speak- ing, with the curve of prices. The commercial crises of 1903-1904 and 1907-1908 sfeem, however, to have retarded the demand for higher wages much more than the advance in prices, while in the period of depression which began in 1913 the downward trend of the demand for higher wages proceeded simultaneously with the movement upward of prices. On the other hand the percentage of strikes to prevent wage reductions rises perceptibly in the crises of 1903-1904 and 1907 and 1908 and during the depres- sion at the time of the outbreak of the war. In the intervening periods of expanding employment and rising prices strikes to secure higher wages increased. As to the duration of strikes, the curve showing the percentage in each year of strikes of more than thirty days duration has the same general trend as the curves of prices, demand for higher wages and union recognition. It is noteworthy that when the crest of the wave of prosperity was reached in 1911-1912 there was a strong demand for higher wages, but the percentage of strikes continuing over thirty days declined. In the depression of 1913 and 1914 the number of, prolonged strikes increased in apparent efforts to make wages conform to the cost of living and to prevent wage reductions, while in 1915 workmen opposed attempted reductions in wages, half the strikes of more than thirty days in that year being chargeable to this cause. In 1916 the steep advance in prices was concurrent with a strong demand for higher wages, but the decline in the percentage of the disputes which endured for more than thirty days indicated that in general adjustments were speedily effected. The years 1903, 1911, 1912 and 1913 are prominent in the record as years of unrest and the years 1902, 1904, 1905, 1915 and 1916 as years of comparative calm. The heavy time loss in 1903 is due chiefly to a number of strikes in the building trades and one of over 3,000 men at Toronto in particular and a strike of 5,000 shoe workers at Quebec. The year stands third highest in the record from the standpoints ot both time loss and number of disputes. ' In 1911, the year of heaviest time loss, there were prolonged strikes in the coal fields of the Crow's Nest Pass and at Springhill, Nova Scotia. In 1913 there was a strike of 6,000 railway construction workers in British Columbia and in September a strike began in the coal mines at Ladysmith, Vancouver Island, which was not terminated until August, 1914. There were strikes of some mag- nitude in gold mines in the Porcupine district, of garment workers at Montreal and of cloak makers at Toronto. The most serious dispute in 1913 was that in coal mines on Vancouver Island. A number of disputes of lesser importance in the building and clothing trades, and a strike by saw-mill hands at St. John, New Brunswick, contri- buted to the total. The years 1902, 1904 and 1905 are years of low time loss in the period of comparative industrial, peace before the era of expanding employment and advancing wages. They also show the influence of the crises of 1900-01 and 1903-04. The effect of the crisis of 1907-08 is no doubt reflected in the decline in the number of disputes. After the outbreak of the war there was a period of almost complete immunity from labour troubles and the year 1915 established a low record in time losses. The year 1916 stands third in the record as a year of low time loss. — o? (0*'0^0^-ooOO — Krt«0 ooooooo oo — -" — ""sz; Wholesale prices (1900=100) Percentage of strikes in each year / / / / For trade union principles / Against reductions in wages — O — 1 Ol mo re t\ tior lan f 1 hirt — ^ y da* / ys' d ura- ^ J / f r / \ ; / N / / \ ' / ^■^ \ / / \ / f / > \ / / / ' \ \ \ /' ^ r — \ \ \ / / I s f \ / \ J... \ / / \ / \ s 1 ^ / -V --' V ^ "'--. N/ ■/ V .1 // ,^ \ A / / V — f^ 'o v^ 1 ^ ^ \ / \ / T \ \ '--- / -'/' ^v \ / \ X 1 / ^^ \ k f / \ / / \ -r N o'' --1 \ I 1 ■ ^0 > Percentage of total disputes in each year tor each cause and of more than thirty days duration. STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 13 INDUSTRUL DISPUTES IXVESTIGATION ACT, PROCEEDINGS BY CALENDAR YEARS. From the report of procee.di,ngs under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act for the fiscal year 1916-1917 is taken also the following statement, showing proceed- ings by calendar years from the enactment of the statute on March 22, 1907, to December 31, 1916, and including figures of strikes occurring in industries which fell within the scope of the Act, but where neither party made application for a Board : — Table a.— Proceedings under Industrial Disputes Investigation Act, 1907, from March ' 22, 1907, to December 31, 1916, by Calendar Years. '1907. 1908. 1909. 1910. 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914. 1915. 1916. Total. Number of applications Number of Boards established Number of settlements after application and without ■ establishment of Board Number of differences adjust- ed while Board was in pro- 2ft 22 3 1 1 22 27 25 2 1 1 15 22 21 1 4 10 28 23 5 2 4 5 21 16 4 1 4 n 16 16 1 1 3 18 18 15 3 1 15 18 18 2 1 3 15 12 3 1 . 9 29 16 10 1 1 11 219 184 32 9 Nuuiberof cases where enquiry before Board did not avert threatened strike Number of strikes in mines and public utilities^ where neither party called for Board 21 119 'The Industrial Disputes Investigation Act became law on March 22, 1907, and the figures are tor nine months only. H-*ublic utilities have been for the purposes of this compilation, taken as including all branches of labour necesriary to'the operation of steam and electric railways, municipal work, gas, electric and power plants, and shipping. INFLUENCES OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES IXVESTIGATION ACT, 1907. The Industrial Disputes Investigation Act, 1907, administered by this Depart- ment, has an important bearing on industrial disputes, and it has been thought well to include in the report a brief record of proceedings under the Act. The following table shows the proceedings from March 22, 1907, the date of the enactment of the statute, to December 31, 1916. 14 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table 4. — Proceedings under Industrial Disputes Investigation Act, 1907, from March 22, 1907, to December 31, 1916, by Industries. Industries affected. No. of disputes referred under Act. No. of strikes not averted or ended. I. Disputes affecting Mines and Public Utilities — 1. Mines : (o) Coal [b) Metal (c) Asbestos 44 16 1 Total Mines. 61 n 2. Transportation and Communication : (a) Railways (6) Street railways (e) Shipping {d) Commercial telegraphy (e) Telephones Total Transportation and Communication 88 27 12 .3 2 3. Light and power 4. Municipal Public Utilities 132 4 10 Total 'affecting Mines and Public Utilities . II. Disputes affecting other than Mines and Public Utilities. 207 12 219 21 21 The total num,b6r of boards of conciliation and investigation established under the Act during the period was 184. The 219 cases in which application was made for the establishment of a board, of con- ciliation and investigation were disposed of as foUovlfS : — 174 were reported upon by boards, 32 were settled without the establishment of boards, nine were settled while the board was in pro- cess of constitution, one board was restrained by the Court of Review from proceeding with its investigation, two were referred to Bx>yal Commissions appointed under the Inquiries Act and one was under consideration by the Minister at the close of the year 1916. COMPARISON WITH OTHER COUNTRIES. Tables are given at the conclusion of the report dealing with strikes in the United Kingdom, Australia, France, Italy, Belgium, Spain, Holland, Sweden, Germany and Austria. Where statistics were available some attempt has been made to compare these countries wiih Canada as to industrial unrest. The only figures available for the United States are those of disputes during 1914 and 1915, and as the United States was not at war during these years no comparison is made. The ratio of the number of disputes to the total industrial population, excluding the agricultural, commercial and professional classes, would be no doubt the best basis of comparison, but statistics are frequently inadequate fdr such comparison and the number of strikes per million of the population in all gainful occupations (these figures being available) has been therefore used as a basis of comparison. The figures show that, making due allowances for the higher degree of industrialization which obtains in some of the other countries, Canada enjoys a greater degree of immunity from trade disputes than other industrial nations. In the period 1911-15 Canada had 166 trade disputes per million of the population gainfully employed. On the same basis the figures for the other countries for which the statistics were available were: United Kingdom, 246; Australia, 455; France, 219; Italy, 293; and Holland, 619. STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 Table 5. — Industrial Disputes in Canada and other Countries. 15 Country. Canada United Kingdom . Australia France Italy Holland Population in all occupations. 2,723,634 20,158,656 1,981,964 20,210,012 16,301,741 2,361,635 Total number of disputes. 449 4,962 903 4,430 4,777 1,461 No. of disputes per million' of population in all occupations . 166 246 455 219 293 B18 2. REVIEW OF THE FIVE-YEAR PERIODS, 1901-1905, 1906-1910 AND 1911-1915. While the number of disputes was lower in the period 1911-15 than in either of the five-year periods, 1906-10 and 1901-05, there was a slight increase in the number of employees affected and the time losses were much greater despite the low figures of the war years 1914 and 1915. This .is due chiefly to the high record in time loss established in the year 1911 mainly on account of a strike of 7,000 coal miners in the Crows Nest Pass and Southern Alberta coal districts and the continuance until May, 1911, of a strike of coal miners at Springhill, N.S., which began in the summer of 1909. The years 1913 and 1912 were also largely responsible as they stand third and fourth respectively in the sixteen years of the record as years of 'heavy time loss. Table 6.— Industrial Disputes, 1901-1905, 1906-1910, 1911-1915. Period. No disputes . No. establishments concerned. No. employees affected. Time loss in working days. 1901-05 1906-10 19)1-15 559 511 449 2,632 .3,747 2,780 123,096 126,179 127,959 2,461,999 3,280,524 4,969,739 Total 1,519 9,159 377,234 10,712,282 From the standpoint of the number of disputes, industrial unrest in the period 1911-15 was greatest in the building trades, there being 128 disputes' in the buildin"- trades in this period as against 123 in 1906-10, and 143 in 1901-05. The metal trades stand next to building with clothing and transportation following in order and it is noteworthy that this order prevails throughout the three quinquennial periods. In the metal trades the number of disputes in 1911-15 was 103, in 1906-10 there were seventy-five disputes and in 1901-05 the number was ninety-five. In clothing, disputes in these periods numbered fifty-one, fifty-six, and fifty-one respectively, and in trans- portation thirty-nine, fifty-four and forty-three respectively. From the standpoint of time losses, industrial unrest in 1911-15 was greatest in the mining industry the clothing trade standing second and building third. The approximate number of work- ing days lost in the mining industry in 1911-15 was 2,570,688 as compared with 1,510,- 16 DEPARTMEiSTT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 307 in 1906-10 and 64Y,172 in 1901-05. The heaviest time loss took place in mining also in the other two five-year periods with building standing second and the clothing trade third in each case. In 1911-15 the time loss in the clothing trade was 587,739 days as against 105,531 days in 1906-10 and 196,797 in 1901-05. Clothing next to the unskilled labour group shows the heaviest increase in time loss over the period 1906-10. In building, the time loss in 1911-15 was 557,194 days, in 1906-10, 474,028 days, and in 1901-05 610,586 days. The time losses in mining and lumbering show marked increases throughout the three periods, the loss of time in lumbering in 1911-15 being more than twice as great as in 1906-10. There was also a steady increase in time loss in the metals group although this is probably not disproportionate to the expansion of the industry. The time loss in the unskilled labour group was practically the same in the first two periods but in 1911-15 this group shows the heaviest increase there being a loss of 475,950 days as compared with 19,402 in the period 1906-10. The time loss in the foods and tobacco group was also much heavier in the period 1911-15, than in either of the two previous periods. In the building, wood-working, printing and miscellaneous groups, more working days were lost than in the period 1906-10, but fewer than in 1901-05. The figures of time losses in the textile, leather and general transportation groups in 1911-15 were the lowest of the three periods. It is evident that mining contributes a constantly increasing share of the country's industrial unrest, about twenty-five per cent of the total time loss being chargeable to this industry in the first quinquennium as against approximately forty-seven per cent and fifty-one per cent in the periods 1906-10 and 1911-15, respectively. Leaving min- ing out of consideration the volume of industrial unrest as measured by time losses shows a decline in the second quinquennium and the increase in the third period is greatly reduced. This is indicated in the following statement in which the figures for 1901-05 are taken as 100 in each case: — Time loss in working days — Total time loss Time loss excluding mining 1901-05. 1906-10. 1911-15 100 133-3 201-9 100 97-9 132-2 Industrial unrest in the mining industry is chargeable chiefly to coal mining, the time loss on account of labour troubles in coal mines being particularly heavy in the years 1911, 1913 and 1916. The greatest single factor in the time loss of 2,046,650 working days in 1911, the largest time loss in the sixteen years of the record, was a seven-months strike of 7,000 coal miners in the Crow's Nest Pass and Southern Alberta districts. This strike involved a time loss of 1,580,000 working days. Another important factor in the 1911 record was the continuance until :M!ay, 1911, of a twenty- two months strike of coal miners at Springhill, Nova Scotia, which had been in existence from the summer of 1909. The number of working days lost through this strike in 1911 alone was 190,000: While the number of strikes in 1912, namely, 150, was larger than in any other year of the record, coal mining disputes were relatively unimportant. There were only two disputes in this industry, one at Coleman, Alberta, where 560 men were on strike for less than a week, and one at Cumberland, and Lady- smith, on Vancouver Island, which involved a time loss of 350,500 days in 1912. This strike which began September 17, 1912, was not settled until August 19, 1914; the time loss in 1913 on account of this dispute was 588,000 days. The only other dispute in coal mining in 1913 took place at Taber, Alberta, and involved only 37 employees. The continuance of the strike on Vancouver Island until August, 1914, involved a loss of 153,750 working days in that year, and a strike of 900 coal miners at Nordegg, Alberta, brought the time loss in coal mining up to 169,200 days in a total time loss for the year of 430,000 working days. In 1915 there were five relatively unimportant strikes in the coal mining industry, two of these took place at Westville, Nova Scotia, and one at Springhill, in the same province. Strikes of coal miners at Lovettville and Drum- heller, Alberta, accounted for the remaining two. The time loss on account of these strikes was 16,794 days in a total for the year of 106,000 days. In 1916 strikes in coal mines accounted for 73,000 days in a total time loss of 208,000 days. These strikes, STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1^1-1916 17 which were of short duration, took place at Stellarton and Minto, Nova Scotia, at Bienfait and Taylorton, Saskatchewan, at Bellevue, Alberta, and South Wellin^n, British Columbia, and two in the Crow's Nest Pass and Alberta coal fields. Table 7.— Industrial Disputes by Industries, 1901-1905, 1906-1910 and 1911-1915. Class of Industry. No. Disputes. No. Establish ments eonoemed. . No.* Employees affected. Time Loss in Working Days. Fishing— 1901-05 C 4 3 13 5 37 13,300 677 2,750 189,600 8,48S 55,000 1906-10 1911-15 13 55 16,727 ^53,088 Lun'bering — 1901-05 190S-10 1911-15 13 15 7 13 22 .35 2.640 2;92l 2,825 9,490 61,587 111,670 35 70 8,,SS6 212,647- Mining— 1901-05 1906-10 1911-15 37 50 29 43 106 103 27,732 33,997 26,231 647,172 1,510,307 2,570,688 116 252 87,960 4,728,167 Building— 1901-05 143 123 128 394 1,728 2,735 1,655 22.680 27,319 26,507 610,586 474,028 , 557,194 1906-10 1911-15 6,118 76,506 1.641,808 Metal— 1901-05 95 75 103 188 369 298 10,580 8,337 13,763 208,953 218,961 237,022 1906-10 1911-15 273 855 32.680 664,936 Woodworking— 1901-05 1906-10 33 14 6 82 39 50 3,055 1,303 690 60,»13 14,472 31,377 1911-15 53 171 5,048 106,662 Printing and Publishing- 1901-05 1906-10 18 10 4 84 31 42 1,100 316 ■;^29 9,590 4,119 4,605 32 157 1,745 18,314 Textiles— 1901-05 1906-10 15 21 9 14 24 9 4,456 14,436 2,478 42,751 236,783 27,090 1911-15 45 47 21,370 306,624 51 56 51 200 106 156 8,968 6,076 21,454 196,797 105,531 587,739 1906-10 1911-15 158 462 36,498 890,067 28163—2 18 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table 7.— Industrial Disputes by Industries, etc.— Concluded. Class of Industry. No. Disputes. No. Establish- ments concerned. No. Employees affected. IHme Loss in Working Day*/ 1 Food, Liquors and Tobacco— 1901-05 41 21 15 ■S4 73 55 2,153' 1,160 1,176 16,201 1906-10 15,761 1911-15 31,722 77 222 4,4S9 63,684 Leather — 1901-05 9 11 3 14 34 4 324 548 80 3,596 1906-10 13,434 1911-15 2,570 23 52 952 19,600 General Transport— 1901-05 ; 1906-10 43 54 39 83 112 145 18,970 21,622 12,553 411,778 573,396 1911-15 212.138 136 340 53,145 1,197,313 Miscellaneous— 22 17 32 45 43 158 3,296 1,477 2,019 36,053 24,255 35,073 1905-10 ,: 71 252 6,792 95,381 Unskilled Labour — 1901-05 1906-10 1911-15 ; 33 40 20 31 42 33 3,842 5,990 15,104 18,619 19,402 475,950 93 106 24,936 513,975 Grand Total. 1,519 • 9,159 377,234 10,712,262 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 19 3. IMPOETANT DISPUTES IN THE PERIOD 1911-1916. 1911. Disputes, 99; Employees, 30,094; Time Loss, 2,046,650 Days. The year 1911 was one of unprecedented severity in industrial disputes in Canada - in So far, at least, as measured by time loss in working days although few lines of industry other than coal mining were seriously affected. The number of strikes in existence was 99, three of which were carried over from 1910, as compared with 84 in existence in the previous year, this increase being, however, in no way commensurate with the increase in time loss to over two million days. In no previous year save 1903 had the time loss reached one million days. A strike at Springhill, N.S., which began in August, 1909, and involved the employees of the Cumberland Eailway and Coal Com- pany was not terminated until May, 1911, although operations were resumed in the miuBS on a limited scale in the month of March, 1910. The trouble arose out of the employees' demand for recognition of the United Mine Workers of America and con- cerned also wages and conditions of employment. Application was made by the employees concerned for a board of conciliation and investigation under the Indus- trial Disputes Investigation Act. The Board was constituted in June, 1909, and reported in July of that year. The findings of the Board were not acceptable to the employees and a strike ensued. Settlement was finally reached by negotiation between the parties. The time loss charged against the Springhill dispute was 190,- 000 days for 1911, or 760,000 days for the twenty-two months over which the dispute extended.. — Before the strike at .Springhill ended the coal miners in the region of the Crow's Nest Pass, covering eighteen coal mining properties in Southeastern British Columbia and Southern Alberta, and numbering about 7,000 went out, a strike having started on April 1. The Crow's Nest Pass Coal Company which had escaped the strike of 1909, was less fortunate on this occasion, and the companies remained together and took common action. A worlyng agreement made in June, 1909, at the close of the strike in that year, lapsed on March 31, 1911. Efiorts to negotiate a new agreement to permit continuous work failed, after numerous conferences at Calgary, Alberta. A Board ^established under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act (but not applied for before the strike was called) .was unable to adjust the dispute. Wages and conditions were among the questions involved, but the chief difficulty arose as to the precise relations between the mining operators and the officials of the U.M.W.A., of which organization the employees were members. The crucial point, as in 1909, was the " check-off " and its precise form, whether or not, in fact, it should be given in such a form as practically to include the concession of the " closed shop." The time loss reached the relatively high figure of 1,390,000 working days, which alone was greatly in excess of the total of any preceding year. The two coal strikes caused a time loss of 1,580,000 days, more than three-quarters of the total for the year. In other industries there was no- disastrous dispute, but a number of strikes of building tradesmen at Vancouver caused time loss of about 250,000 days. A strike of railway machinists in the employ of the Grand Trunk Pacific Eailway Company occurred subsequent to the closing down of the conipany's shops at Edmonton and Rivers. At the time of the strike a hoard of conciliation and investigation was investi- gating the dispute, which involved wages, hours and conditions of employment and a demand on the part of the employees for a schedule of agreement with the company. The award of the Board was satisfactory to the men but the company declined to accept it and the strike was hot formally settled until December 13, 1912. The time loss due to this dispute during 1911 was 21,000 days. The number of disputes referred for adjustment under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act during the year was 21; in four cases the threatened strike was not averted. 28163— 2J 20 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CAlf ADA 1912. Disputes, 150; Employees, 40,5H; Time Loss, 1,099,208 Days. In 1912 the number of strikes continued to advance, but the time loss of the pre- vious year was cut in half. Two of the 150 disputes in existence during the year were carried over from 1911. There was no serious dispute in the coal mining industry until towards the close of the yiear when a strike began at Ladysmith on Vancouver island, which entailed a time loss in 1912 of 35,000 days. In metalliferous mining there was a strike of some importance in the Porcupine district, where 1,200 gold miners went out on November 15, subsequent to the report of a board of conciliation and investigation which had inquired into the proposed reduction in wages, which was the main point in dispute. The strike, which was not terminated until June, 14, 1913, involved a time loss of 46,500 days in 1912r A strike which overshadowed others as to time loss, although it did not seriously affect the industrial life of the country, was one of railway construction labourers in British Oolmnbia, who went out on April 1, the strike being called off on June 15. The men numbered about 6,000 and the time loss was estimated at 360,000. Railway construction workers at Prince Rupert also went out and caused a time loss of 81,000 days. A strike of garment work- ers at Montreal caused a loss of 143,500 days and a dispute in the cloak-making industry at Toronto caused a time loss of 120,000 days. A strike of the employees of the Canadian Pacific Eailway Company, including freight hajidlers and freight clerks, took place on November 4, on account of the com- pany's refusal to consider an application for a schedule of rules and rates and the dismissal of certain employees who refused to withdraw from the Canadian Brother- hood of Railroad Employees. Shortly after the strike occurred a board of conciliation and investigation was constituted to deal with m£ttt.ers in dispute on the Ottawa ■ division, at Fort William and Port Arthur. The board's findings, although acceptable to the employees, were not accepted by the company and a strike'resulted. This strike was not terminated until February 1, 1913. The Grand Trunk Pacific Railway mach- inists' strike mentioned above (1911), which had been continued from October, 1911, was not formally settled until December 13. The number of men concerned was not large but as the strike extended over so long a period, the time loss was 44,000 working days. This strike was one of the most difficult of the year from some points of view and thp Minister of Labour assisted in bringing the dispute to a close. The number of disputes referred for adjustment tmder fhe Industrial Disputes Investigation Act during the year was 16 ; in three cases the threatened strike was not averted. 1913. Disputes, 113; Employees., 39,536; Time Loss, 1,28'7,6'78. There was a decrease in the number of disputes in existence in 1913, 113 being reported, 7 of which were carried over from 1912, but the numbers of employers and employees affected were practically the same as in the previous year. A^ slight increase, however, took place in the number of working days lost, the figures being 1,287,-678 and 1,099,208 for 1913 and 1912 respectively. The increase in time loss is accounted for by the fact that two disputes, one of coal miners on Vancouver island, and another involving lumber mill hands at St. John were together responsible for the loss of 722,850 working days, about 56 per cent of the total time loss of the year. The most important dispute was that of coal miners on Vancouver island, which commenced some months prior to the end of 1912 at Cumberland and Extension mines operated by Canadian Collieries, Limited. The number of men idle at the commence- ment of the dispute was about 1,700, but in May all the men employed in and around the mines at Nanaimo, South Wellington and Jinglepot came out and 3,500 hands iSTRlKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 21 were idle during the summer months of 1913. A partial settlement was effected through an agreement between the Vancouver-Nanaimo Coal Company and its employees numbering about 260 men, but in other respects the trouble remained unsettled at the end of 1913, when it was estimated that about 1,000 former employees were idle at various points. In all about 588,000 working days were lost during 1913 as a result of this strike. Although the dispute fell within the scope of the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act, neither party applied for a board and the machinery of the statute could not be utilized. The dispute was made the subject of special inquiry by Mr. Samuel Price as a Eoyal commissioner during the summer of 1913, and the district affected was visited at different times by officers of the department for purposes of inquiry and conciliation. The Minister of Labour also visited the strike area in the summer of 1913. Serious disturbances of peace occurred about the middle of August, and numerous arrests resulted. A force of militia and special constables remained in the affected areas dur- ing the later months of the year. The difficulties in the lumbering industry at St. John N.B., were also serious. The saw-mills in the city were idle during the summer months on account of a lockout on the part of the millowners following a demand for increased wages made by raft- men, pondsmen and pilers. Eleven firms were involved in the dispute and some 1,500 men were thrown out of employment although only 150 were directly concerned in the demand for higher wages. Trades of all kinds were seriously affected and building operations were hampered by the lack of building materials. None of the mills were sawing until September and at the end of the month , operations were generally resumed, the men having returned to work at the former rate of wages. The time loss in this dispute was 134,850 working days. The building, metal and clothing trades were the other lines chiefly affected by strikes during the year. The number of disputes referred for adjustment under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act during the year was 18; in one case the threatened strike was not averted. 1914. Disputes^ 44; Employees, 8,678; Time Loss, 430,054 Days. The number of trade disputes in existence in Canada during the year 1914, was 44 (four of which were carried over from the previous year), the lowest number recbrded since the department began the collection of strike statistics in 1901. In all respects save in the number of establishments affected (in which the figures for 1914 were slightly in excess of those of 1908) and time loss, the record for the year showed much lower figures than during any previous year. The number of disputes actually commenced in the year 1914 was 40, there being four disputes carried over from the previous year. These strikes were those of the coal miners on Vancouver island, shoe workers at Quebec and garment workers and cigar-makers at Montreal, which accounted for more than half the number of employees •concerned, as well as half the approximate time loss in working days during the year. The strike of coal miners on Vancouver Island, which began in '1912 was not finally terminated until August, 1914. In August, 1913, a partial settlement was effected (see 1913), and in March, 1914, the Western Fuel Company made an agree- ment with its then employees on conditions involving an increase in wages approxi- mating ten per cent on those paid under the agreement in force when the strike of May 1 began at the Nanaimo, South Wellington and Jinglepot mine. The new agree- ment was made terminable on October 1, 1916. During the month of June it was announced that the Union Mine Workers' organization had found it necessary to cease supporting the'^rike on Vancouver Island, it being generally understood that the amount which had been paid out by the organization for the relief of strikers from the inception of the trouble in September, 1912, approximated one and a half million 22 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA dollars. This situation and the outbreak of the European war in August no doubt increased the disposition of the strikers to bring about a working agreement with the operators. Another important strike which began in 1913, that of shoe machine workers at Quebec, in which over 3,000 operatives were affected, was settled in February, 1914, through a conference of the parties brought about by an officer of the Department of Labour and a committee of citizens. The dispute commenced in the latter part of December, 1913, and affected about 3,000 employees in shoe manufacturing establish- ments operated by members of the Quebec Shoe Manufacturers' Association. The employees concerned were members of the Canadian Federation of Shoe Workers (leather cutters), the Federation of Boot and Shoe Workers (machinists), and the Boot and Shoe Workers' Union (shoe lasters). During October, 1918, notices were posted in various factories setting forth the conditions on which such factories would be opened. The terms of the employers were gener- ally accepted at the time by the employees. In December, however, employees in two establishments objected to the employment of a non-unionist and went on strike. The factories affected were those of the John Ritchie Company ^nd Messrs. Gale Brothers, employing about 220 hands. At the end of December all the members of the Shoe Manufacturers' Association decided to close their establishments, owing to the fact that their employeas had refused to sign individually the agreement governing conditions of employment. The effect of this decision was to cause an almost com- plete cessation of work in this industry in Quebec, the only establishments running being those operated by firms which were not members of the Shoe Manufacturers' Association. Nearly 3,000 operatives were directly affected by this dispute, which caused some loss of time in other lines, particularly among leather workers and box makers. By the terms of the agreement the men were not required to sign individual contracts, but it was arranged that a committee of three representatives from each of the unions interested should sign for them. To ensure fulfilment of the contract a monetary penalty of $600 was fixed, $200 from each union. In case of non-fulfilment of the terms of the contract the money to be confiscated for the use of the Shoe Manu- facturers' Association. Provision was also made for the hearing of individual griev- ances. Any employee having such w^as required to make a deposit of $25 before the case could be heard by the Board of Arbitration, the party in default to bear the cost^ of the hearing. Another clause provided that the unions interested should secure legal recognition by incorporation as soon as possible. Only two strikes affecting miners commenced during the year 1914 — coal miners at JNordegg,';Alta., and metal miners at Cobalt. The former dispute occurred on June 10 and affected directly 300 miners and indirectly 600 employed by the Brazeau Collierie.s, Limited. The employees were negotiating for an agreement and suspended operations pending an adjustment. The dispute was terminated by an agreement between District 18 of the United Mine Workers of America and the Brazeau Col- lieries, Limited, dated July 1, 1914, and to continue in effect until March 31, 1915. The agreement followed practically the lines of the then existing agreement between District 18 and the Western Coal" Operators' Association with some amendments. The strike of silver miners at Cobalt, in which some seventy-five miners in the. employ of the Coniagas mine were affected, arose over a dispute as to a computation of the eight-hour day which went into effect January 1, 1914, as the result of legis- lation enacted by the Ontario Legislature. The matter was adjusted a few days after the dispute occurred and the men returned to work. Of a number of strikes in the building trades may be mentioned strikes of car- penters at Montreal, Que., and at London, Ont. The strikes at Montreal arose out of the alleged unwillingness of contractors concerned to comply with an agreement made in 1912, and also in regard to questions affecting increased wages and shorter hours. A fair wage officer of the Department of Labour visited the locality and both parties to the dispute were induced to submit the matters in question to a Board of Concilia- tion under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act. The strike commenced June STMKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 23 1, and the men returned to work June 15, pending a reference to the Board, The Board was constituted on June 23 and made, its report July 17. As a result of the proceedings before the Board an agreement was reached between the parties, by which the men gained the greater part of their demands. A copy of the agreement was printed in the August, 1914, issue of the Labour Gazette. About 1,000 employees were affected by this strike. The strike of carpenters at London began on the same date as the carpenters' strike in Montreal. The objects of the strike were a minimum wage of 40 cents an hour, a nine-hour day, union recognition and re-establishment of the apprentice system. The; number of men involved was about 200. After a dispute of some six weeks' dur- ation the men returned to work on July 30 at the rate of wages which existed before the strike. A strike of garment workers at Montreal which commenced in September, 1913, and which affected about 400 employees and three firms, was settled during March, 1914. The cause of the strike in one establishment was a proposed reduction in wages; in another shop it was alleged that work had been given out to non-union hands at lower rates and in the third factory employees went out in sympathy with the other strikers. The dispute virtually ended in March, 1914, although not officially called off, the strikers securing employment in other factories. A strike which affected about 1,000 employees of a cloak company at Toronto began in March, the point at issue being apparently the introduction of the contract labour system into the women's cloak and suit trade. Efforts were made without success by the Trades and Labour Council of Toronto to effect settlement, and in May 4.') employees of another company went on strike for similar reasons. The strikers were given strike pay by the unions concerned. At the outbreak of the war the strike was closed without settlement in either establishment and a few weeks later one of the companies closed its factory on account of business depression. There was but one dispute during the year which could be said to be distinctly a lockout, that of harness makers at Gananoque, which occurred in March, some 30 employees being affected. The cause of the dispute was the formation by the employees of a labour organization affiliated with an international union. A fair wage officer of the Department of LaTjour succeeded in bringing the parties together, but no settle- ment was affected at the time. Later through the efforts of an arbitration committee of the Gananoque Board of Trade, an agreement reported to be satisfactory to both parties was arrived at and the men returned to work, without relinquishing member- ship in their union. The number of disputes referred for adjustment under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act_ during the year was 18, in one case the threatened strike was not averted. 1915. Disputes, 43; Employees, 9,140; Time Loss, 106,149 Days. There were 38 new disputes in 1915 and five carried over from 1914, making a total of 43 disputes in existence in the year. This was the lowest number of disputes recorded in the history of the Department. The number recorded in 1914, namely, 44 was the previous low record. In the 43 disputes, 96 establishments and 9,140 employees were affected, with an approximate loss of time of 106,149 working days. In, the metal' trades there were 13 strikes, the greatest number recorded for a single industry during the year. The loss of time was also heaviest in this industry, 40,812 days having been lost by 2,842 employees. Workers in the miscellaneous trades' were involved in seven disputes and while there were only six disputes in mining, the number of employees affected in this industry, 4,332, was greater than in any other. Among the more important strikes may be mentioned a strike of coal miners at Springhill, NjS. which affected about 1,125 work-people, and involved a time loss of approximately 2,625 days. Strikes of some 2,500 asbestos miners at Thetford Mines- 24 DEPARTMENT OP LABOUR^ CANADA caused a time loss of 7,500 days, and a strike of coal miners at Drumheller, Alta., of a few days' duration involved 200 men and caused a time loss of approximately 1,000 days. A strike of metal workers at New Glasgow, N.S., affected some 2,000 employees for about four days and involved a time loss of approximately 8,000 days. This whicli was the result of a misunderstanding was settled by a board of conciliatioii and arbitra- tion. Under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act. Longshoremen at Vancouver to the number of 600 were concerned in a strike which lasted about a month and involved a time loss of approximately 15,000 working days. The number of disputes referred for adjustment under the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act during the year was 15; in one case the threatened strike was not averted. 1916. Disputes, 75; Employees, 21,157; Time loss, 208,277 Days. With pronounced activity in branches of manufacturing, supplying munitions of war and other military supplies, in mining and lumbering, with the advance in the cost of living and the gradual depletion of the supply of labour the demand for higher wages was much stronger during 1916, and the number of industrial disputes increased. The number of strikes in existence rose from 43 in 1915 to 75 in 1916, (one dispute was carried over from 1915), and there was an increase in the time loss of 102,128 working days. In transportation, which was the industry most affected, 19 strikes involving 33 concerns and 2,340 workers with a time loss estimated at 27,288 working days were recorded. Fifteen strikes with a time loss of S3,133 working days and affecting 44 employees, were reported in the metals group. There were ten strikes in mining and the number of workers involved (11,814) and the time loss (88,634 days), were greater ihan in any other industry. Eleven strikes, involving l,17fi workers were reported in the clothing and garment-making industry. There was seven strikes in the building and food groups — and but one in woodworking. Two strikes occurred "in miscellaneous skilled trades and three affected unskilled labour. The most important strikes in- the transportation group, from the standxwint of numbers and time loss, affected teamsters, 500 of whom at Montreal were on strike for a week and nearly 400 at Toronto were out for two weeks. Strikes of teamsters also occurred at Winnipeg and Hamilton. A demand for increased wages was the cause in all cases and the disputes were settled by compromise. There were a number of disputes affecting freight handlers, who in nearly all instances, went out for increased wages, and for the most part were wholly or partially successful. In the mining industry in which the loss of time was greatest, more than half the loss was due to strikes in the Crow's Nest Pass district where miners were out on two occasions, during July and August for a war bonus of 10 jper cent, and for about a week at the end of November for a further war bonus of 25 per cent. In the first strike a compromise was effected by which the men went back to work for an increase of 8 per cent and in the second strike work was resumed pending an investigation by the Government into the increased cost of necessaries in the coal mining districts affected. In the metals groups, which ranked second in the number of disputes and working days lost, the most important disputes were centred at Hamilton and Esquimault. At Hamilton 385 steel workers struck for increased wages but after being out about two weeks went back to work unconditionally. Later at the same place but in different establishments about 1,100 machinists struck for the nine hour day. Some of thev strikers either returned to work or secured employment elsewhere and the number affected at the end of the year when the dispute still remained unadjusted, was about 800. Machinists, boilermakers, blacksmiths and iron shipbuilders at Esquimault to the number of 325 went out during August for the eight -hour day, which they obtained after a strike of about three weeks. About the same time employees of another ship- STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 25 yard, numbering approximately 260 struck against the employment of non-unionists, but returned to work in a few days'when the persons objected to were dismissed. The most important strikes in the clothing group occurred at Montreal where there were thJ-ee strikes affecting over 800 employees. The first of these disputes occurred in June on account of a proposed change in the piece-work system involving a reduction in earnings. The strike was settled on terms favourable to the 'employees after they had been out about a month. The question of union recognition was involved in the two other disputes, the first of which affecting 250 employees, was settled in favour of the eiiiployees ; the other strike was unsettled at the end of the year. While there were seyen strikes in the building trades the numbers involved and loss of time were comparatively unimportant. Of the seven strikes reported in the foods groups, six concerned cigarmakers, and in all cases except one (where the grievance was objection to a foreman) were for increased wages. Hamilton, London, and Montreal were the localities affected, and in every case the disputes terminated at the end of the year resulted in favour of the employees. . ^ Twenty-nine disputes were referred under the Industrial Disjhites Investigation Act and in only one case was the threatened strike not averted. 26 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA 4. DETAILS or INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1911 Occupation. Mining — Coal miners Coal miners Coal miners Coal miners Coal miners Coal miners Silver miners Building Trades — Bricklayers Bricklayers and masons Builders' labourers Builders'-labourers Builders' labourers Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters Cemerit workers and laboureis. Marble workers - Painters Plasterers and plasterers' labour- ers. Plasterers. Plasterers rx . . . . Plumbers ■. . . Plumbers and steamfitters Plumbers and steamfitters Plumbers, tinsmiths and roofers. Stone cutters Stone cutters and masons Springhill, N.S..,. Port Morien, N.S. Michel, B.C Coleman, Alta Silver Centre. Ont . Locality. Alberta and Eastern Brit ish Columbia. Cardiff, Alta Brandon, Man Calgary, Alta St. John, N.B . . . , Kitchener, Ont . Vancouver, B.C. . Vancouver, B.C. . . St. John, N.B . Hamilton, Ont Welland, Ont. Brandon, Man Calgary, Alta. Victoria, B.C.. Port Arthur, Orit'. Montreal, Que . . . Calgary, Alta. . Wingham, Ont . . Winnipeg, Man Port Arthur and William, Ont. Calgary, Alta Montreal, Que. Brandon, Man. Fort St. Catharines, Ont. Calgary, Altar Kitchener and Waterloo, Ont. Quebec, Que Calgary and Clinton, Alta. Kingston, Ont Cause or Object. For recognition of union, increase in wages and better conditions. Against rediiction in wages from summer to winter rates. For better conditions of employment For higher wages and better conditions Against withholding of union fees by company to force settlement of claims. Against reduction in wages Against employment of non-unionist . For increase in wages Against employment of a particular person.. For increase in wages For increase in wages for overtime.. For increase in wages Against reduction in wages _ For increase in wages For increase in wagesand recognition of union. For increase in wages For longer hours in winter months Against alleged violation of union rules. . . . For increase in wages Against employment of non-unionists and discharge of foreman. For higher wages and shorter hours For increase in wages Against sub- letting of work Dispute between unions STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PERIOD 1911-1916. 1911 27 Method of Settlement. Oonoiliation Work resumed without negotia- tions. Negotiations between parties concerned, Refcrencf to a board vinder I.D.I. Act, 1907. Reference to a Judge as arbi- trator. Not reported Work resumed without iiegotia- tions. Negotiations between partiel^ concerned. Work resumed without negotia- tions. iMegotiations between parties concerned Not reported Negotiations between parties concerned. Not reported Partly by negotiations, partly by places of strikers being filled. Places of strikers filled . XJnsettled at end of year Work resumed withoutnegotia- tiDns. Pla.es of strikers filled Arbitration Work resumed withoutnegotia- tipns. Negotiations between parties concerned. Conciliation . . . Not reported . Negotiations between parties concerned. Result. A compromise In favour of employer . A compromise Not reported . In favour of employees. A compromise In favour of employees., A compromise In favour of employers , A compromise [n favour of employees.. 1909. Aug. 11 . Jan. 2.. Feb. 21.. April 1 . . Nov 9.. Mar. 20.. Jan. 15.. Not reported In favour of employees . Not reported Employees partly successful In favour of employer Unsettled at end of year. . In favour of employers , . . In favour of employer. . In favour of employees A compromise Not reported Employers not involved.. S I o e3 July 7. ■lune 1 . •May 1. May 12. May 1. April 10. May 1. May 1. May 2. May 15. June 20. May 1, June - . •July 18. Nov. 16. Dec. 19 May 1. April 17 . April 3. Nov. 4. Nov. 18. 1 May •June Aug. 21. May 1. June 29. May 1. May 29. 1911. .Ian. 25. Mar, 1 . Nov. 20. Nov. 20. Mar. 24. July 10. June 10 May 5. May 19. May 19. July 25. May 5. ■June -. June 12. May 16. Sept. - . May 16. Aug. 18. Nov. May 8. April - , April 10. Nov. 7. Nov. 22. May 2. Jime 23. Aug. 22. May 15. July -. June 30. ■3S o a 22 10 .SB O B 1,000 154 950 7,000 80 550 35 9,769 87 291 40 130 116 29 300 40 10 88 80U 800 29 50 35 90 85 45 24 55 50 28 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1911 Occupation. Buildivg IVndcs— Continued. Stone cutters All building trades except bricklayers, carpenters and electrical workers. Metal Trades — Blacksmiths Boiler makers, '. .• . Car and foundry workers Electrical workers Electrical workers Electrical linemen Furnace tenders Iron moulders Iron moulders Iron moulders and coremakers . Iron moulders Labourers in iron works Machinists Sheet metal workers Shipbuilders Structural iron workers Structural iron workers Electrical workers Woodworking Trades — Billiard table makers Pattern makers Textiles — Carpet weavers Cotton spinners Cotton mill hand^ Cotton mill hands St. Catharines, Ont., Montreal, Que Montreal, Que Toronto, Ont. . . Quebec, Que .... Vancouver, B.C. Calgary, Alta Edmonton, Alta Niagara Falls, Ont. . St. Catharines, Ont, Guelph, Ont Toronto, Ont London, Ont Smith's Falls, Ont . St. John, N.B. Calgary, Alta Levis, Que.". . . . Toronto, Ont . Hamilton, Ont . . . Vancouver, B.C. . Toronto, Ont Peterborough, Ont. Toronto, Ont St. Henri, Que . . . Hochelaga, Que . Magog, Que Against alleged violation of fair wage clause. . In sympathy with striking carpenters and electrical workers. Against discharge of foreman.. Sympathy with other strikers . For increase in wages Cause or Object. Delay in payment of wages For increase in wages Against employment of a foreman and for better working conditions. Against reduction in piecework prices and for shorter hours. For increase in wages For increase in wages to make up for redno- tion in hours. For increase in wages For shorter hours For increase in wages. For increase in wages. Lockout on account of employees joining a union. Against employment of a non-unionist Against action of a foreman. For increase in wages * About 12 men continued out after July 19. No definite settlement in their case. tA.bout 13 men of one firm continued out after May 12. No definite settlement reported in their case. JSix men still receiving strike pay on November 1. STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-1916— Con^mMei. / 1911 29 Method of Settlement, Work resumed pending investi- gation by Dept. of Labour. Negotiations between parties concerned. In favour of employer Settlement made by indivi- dual unions. Work resumed afterexplanation from company. Work resumed without negotia- tions. II II II IT Negotiations between parties concerned. Places of strikers filled . Conciliation Flaces of strikers filled . Result. In favour of employer.' In favour of employees. . A compromise In favour of employees In favour of employer.. . A compromise Negotiations between parties concerned. Men procured work elsewhere . . Negotiations between parties concerned. Conciliation Work resumed without negotia- tions. II II Negotiations between parties concerned. Negotiations between parties concerned. Work resumed without negotia tions. Work resumed ; nou-uiiionist joined union. Negotiations between parties concerned. Work resumed without negotia- tions. In favour of employer . . A compromise In favour of employers . A compromise In»favour of employees.. In favour of employers. Not reported . A compromise . In favour of employer In favour of employees . . . In favour of employees In favour of employer B S o O Aug. .S. , June 5.. Feb. 6. Nov. 13. .lune 12. June 12. June 15 Aug. -. May 1, Jan. 3. May 1. May 4. June 5 . May 2. Dec. 7. June 23. July 4. May 1. May 1. June 1 . Mar. 30. Apr. 18. Mar. 24. Mar. 31. Nov. 2. Nov. 20. a E-i - Aug, 12. July 25. Feb. 8 Nov. 25 June 20 July 18* June 26 Aug. - May - Jan. 6 May May 12t Nov. -. .: May 6. Dec. 9, July 8. July 12. May 31. May 31, July 25. HP O u 1 54 248 1 1 1 18 1 1 1 1 12 3 1 1 Apr. 6. May 5. Sept. 5. Apr. 8. Nov. 6. Dec. 4. 50 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 20 5,500 8,828 100 200 1,200 100 100 100 20 250 67 270 60 200 65 ' 70 115 •200 50 3,167 42 18 60 114 109 120 600 943 30 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1911 Occupation. Clothing — Cap workers. Coat makers Fur workers . . . Garment workers. Garment workers. Garment workers. Garment workers. . Garment workers. Garment workers . Glove workers .... Shoe workers Shoe workers Tailors Food, Liquors and Tobacco— Bakers Brewery workers Cigar makers Leather — Horse collar makers . Winnipeg, Man Hamilton, Ont. . . Sandwich, Ont . . . Winnipeg, Man . Montreal, Que . . Montreal, Que . . . Toronto, Ont. . . . Montreal, Que . . Montreal, Que. . . Montreal, Que . . . Quebec, Que Toronto, Ont. . , . Ottawa, Ont . . , . General Transport — Freight hand]er.s . . . . Freight handlers Garbage qolleotors . . Longshoremen. Longshoremen Longshtiremen Railway machinists and boiler- makers. Railway yardmen Section men Teamsters. Teamsters. . Teamsters. . Locality. Vancouver and New Westminster, B.C. Winnipeg, Man London, Ont Winnipeg, Man . . . Hamilton, Out. Montreal, Que. Hamilton, Ont. Toronto, Ont. Prince Rupert, B.C Montreal, Que Westport, Ont. to Edson, Alta. Hamilton. Ont Niagara Falls to Wind- 'sor, Ont. Victoria, B.C Victoria, B.C. .. Edmonton, Alta. Cause or Object. Lockout on refusal to make caps for a com' pany which had a strike. Against introduction of piece work system .. . . For increase in wages Lockout on refusal to make clothes for com- pany which had a strike. Against employment of a particular person . . . Against employment of non-unionist Against conditions of employment NTot reported Against employment of a oertain^foreman and reduction in piece-work prices. ~ Men objected to foreman doing work cf absent employee. For higher piece-work prices Against discharge of an employee For shorter hours For higher wages, shorter hours and recogni- tion of union. Against eujployment of particular persons Alleged lockout because of refusal to sign agreement not to join a imion. For increase in wages )i tt 11 M Refusal of men to work under another com- pany. Against reduction in wages Against conditions of employment ITor higher wages, shorter horn's and changes in conditions of employment. Against employment of a non-unionist Against reduction in wages For higher wages and shorter hours For payment of wages for legal holidays For increase in wages STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 19014916 31 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-1916— Coniinued. 1911 Method of Settlwment. Work resumed . Negotiations between parties concerned. Not reported ' . Work resumed under open shop conditions. Places Of strikers filled Negotiations between parties concerned. Places of strikers filled Places of some strikers filled; others resumed work. Negotiations between parties concerned. Work resumed by some strikers places of others filled. Work resumed on reinstatement of employee. Partly by negotiations between parties concerned. Negotiations between parties concerned. Work resumed without negotia- tions. Places of strikers filled Places of strikers filled Work resumed Negotiations between parties concerned. tl M It II Conciliation Unsettled at end of year Places of strikers filled Conciliation Negotiations between parties concerned. Places of some strikers filled, work resumed by others. Negotiations between parties concerned. Result. In favour of employer. . In favour of employees. . Not reported In favour of employer . In favour of employer . . . . Not reported In favour of employer. . . . Not reported . . . A compromise. Both parties claimed settle- ment in their favour. In favour of employer In favour of employees.. Employees partially suc- cessful. A compromise In favour of employees. , In favoiir of employer. In favour of employer. . . . II 'I ... Indefinite In favour of employer In favour of employees. . . . A ccmpromise . . . . Unsettled at end of year. . . fn-favour of employer 1 n favour of employees . . . A compromise In fai'our of employers. . . In favour of employees. . Dec. 30 10 May 30,. Jan. 14,. Dec. 22 '10 Mar. 20., .June 13., June 28, , Nov. 21: Dhc. — .. .June 5 . . Mar. 17 . Mar, 3.. Mar. 27.. May 1., July 10,, Sept. 7 . . Oct. 9,, May 1, Sept. 28, June 7. May 10, Nov. 1, Nov. 17. Oct. 10. Sept. 20. May 3. May 10. •June 1 . Aug. 8. Jan. 4. May 31. Jan. 4 , Mar. 24. June 20. Oct. — . Dec. 1. Deo. 26. June 14, .Mar. 20, Apr, 8. Apr. 7. May — . July 12, Sept. 8, Oct. — , May 5 , Oct. — •fune 9 May 11, Nov. 6. Nov. 20. Sept. — , May 26, May 11, June 12, Aug. 9. . o o o 13 15* 2 1 18 10.T ft s 1=1 15 100 32 23 2j 140 35 350 150 332 8 1,285 160 53 213 15 15 2',i 200 20 40 30 2,100 300 68 1,400 225 300 275 4,987 * Number not reported, but fifteen firms signed agreement with Bakers' Union. 32 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 4. DETAILS or INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1911 Occupation. MisceUaneouST— Basket makers Gas work employees Hotel waiters Pulp beaters Pulp mill hands ~ Warehouse men Unskilled Labour:^ Kailway.construction labourers. Street labourers Street labourers . .'. Street labourers . Stoney Creek, Ont Toronto, Ont Toronto, Ont Ottawa, Ont St. George, N.B .. . Montreal, Que Toronto, Ont Prince Rupert, B.C London, Ont St. Thomas. Ont... Cause or Object. For increase in wages . For increase in wages . For shorter hours '. . For higher wages and shdrter hours . For increase in wages For increase in wages . For increase in waefes and immediate pay- ment of wages due. 1912 Fishing — Halibut fishermen Lumherififf — ■ Sawmill workers . River drivers Mill workers Scowmen Mining^ Coal miners .... Coal miners Silver miners Silver miners Gold miners Ashealm miners . . Buildiiig Trades— Bricklayers Bricklayers Vancouver and New Westminster, B.C. St. John, N.B. Maniwaki, Que Victoria, B.C.. St. John, N.B . Coleman, Alta Cumberland and Lady- smith, B.C. Cobalt, Ont Cobalt, Ont Porcupine, Ont Asbestos, Que Hamilton, Ont Gait, Hespeler and Pres- ton, Ont. For increase.in wages For increase in wages For shorter hours For higher wages and shorter hours . For increase in wages For increase in wages Against discharge of employees Against discharge of employees. . . For shorter hours Against reduction of wages For increase in wages For increase in wages For higher wages STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PERIOD Wll-ldl6— Continued. 1911 33 Method of Settlement. Result. 1 s g B 1 -s s a 1 a 1 ■3 1 1 li 1" J 1 f Negotiations between parties concerned. Work resumed '.'.... One dining room closed Work resumed Unsettled at end of year Places of strikers filled , A compromise In favour of employer Unsettled at end of year. . . In favour of employers — In favour of employer Strikers partially successful In favour of employer Grand total Feb. 16.. July 12 . Mar. 3.. July 18.. Apr. 26. . Feb. 21.. July 17.. Mar. — .. July 22., 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 60 52 73 50 150 85 120 520 292 10,000 July 31.. June 1 . . Mar. 6.. June 6. . Oct. 10.. Aug. 3. . June 3. . Apr. 8. . June 7.. Oct. 13.. 450 6 1 3 1 1 402 11,467 135 250 So 10 270 Places of strikers filled Increase granted to some strikers, places of others filled. Places of strikers filled 6,000 30 30 6 425 . 6,330 475 30,094 2,046,650 1912 Unsettled at end of year. . Negotiations between parties Strikers' places filled Work resumed without negotia- tions. Unsettled at end of year . . Work resumpd pending settle- ment. Unsettled at end of year Decision of union to call strike ofi. "Work resumed without negotia tiuns. Unsettled at end of year. . Negotiations between parties . . Negotiations between parties . . Agreement signed by some con- tractors. 28163—3 In favour of employees . . In favour of employer In favour of employers.. . Unsettled at end of year. Not reported In favour of employees . In favour of employees . In favour of employees . In favour of employees Strikers partly successful... Nov. 18. May 20. June 10. July 2. Dec. 30. July 24.. Sept. 17.. Apr. 28.. Oct. 18.. Nov. 15.. May 1.. May, 1.. May 15, . May 25. June 17. July 14 July 28. Apr. 30. Nov. 4 . iiay 'e. May May 7. 30 14 150 160 500 33 92 200 825 560 2,500 i89 175 1,200 450 5,074 150 77 34 Occupation. Building Trades — (Continued.) Bricklayers and masons Bricklayers Bricklayerii and masons Masons Carpenters and machinists. Carpenters Carpenters. . . Carpenters. . . Carpenters. . . Carpenters. . Carpenters. . Carpenters. . Carpenters. . Carpenters. Carpenters. , Carpenters. . Carpenters. Carpenters. Lathers. Lathers. . Plasterers . Plasterers . Plasterers Plasterers . Painters.. . Painters . Painters . DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTEIAL DISPUTES 1912 Regina, Sask . . . Regina, Sask . , . , Lethbridge, Alta. Oaleary, Alta . . , Mill town. N.B... Quebec, Que Sherbrooko. Que. Ottawa, Ont Kingston, Ont . . . Niagara Falls, Ont . Kitchener, Ont. Port Arthur, Ont. . Winnipeg, Man. . . . Brandon, Man . . . Regina, Sask Saskatoon, Sask. . Moosejaw, Sask. . Calgary, Alta. . Toronto, Ont . . . Saskatoon, Sask. Painters, decorators and paper- hangers. Painters Painters Plumbers and steamBtters. Plumbers. Plumbers . Plumbers . Ottawa, Ont London, Ont Winnipeg, Man. Saskatoon, Sask. Quebec, Que Kingston, Ont. St. Catharines. Eie^i_Ha,. Sask Moosejaw, Sask. ., Saskatoon, Sask. . Halifax, N.S Fredericton, N.B. Kingston, Ont. . .. Brantford, Ont . . . Against employment of unskilled labour For increase in wages For higher wages, shorter hours and pay- ment of wages in cash. Concerning classification of work For increase in wages For higher wages, shorter hours and recog- nition of union. For higher wages and shorter hours For increase in wages For increase in wages Dispute between unions. Alleged non-payinent of wages For higher wages and shorter hours For higher wages, shorter hours, and recog- nition of union. Against dismissal of some employees for refusing to itemize time slips. For higher wages and shorter hours For increase' in wages For higher wages, shorter hours and recog- nition of union. For increase in wages For increase in wages. For higher wages and weekly pay instead of fortnightly. For increase in wages Against employment of carpenters on plaster- ers' work. For higher wages and shorter hours For increase in wages For higher wages and shorter houi^. For increase in wages For higher wages and shorter hours.. For higher wages /. . . . For recognition of union, higher wages and shorter hours. ' For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages and shorter hours For higher wages and adjustment of con- ditions governing apprentices. STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 35 IN THE PERIOD 1911-1Q16— Continued. 1912 Method of Settlement. Negotiations between parties . Negotiations between parties . Particulars not reported M tl . Negotiations between parties . Majority of contractors signed agreement. Work resumed without negotia- tions. " Not reported Men found other employment. . Negotiations between parties Negotiations between men and individual contractors. Negotiations between parties Men secured employment under conditions demanded. Negotiations between parties and intervention of Provincial Labour Bureau. Negotiations between parties , Negotiations between men and individual contractors. Particulars not reported . . . Strikers resumed work at old rate. Negotiations between parties . . Men resumed work uncondi- tionally. Open shop declared Intervention of Provincial La- bour Bureau. Negotiations between parties Men secured other employment Agreement made between par- ties. Men returned to work pending negotiations. Particulars not reported .... Negotiations between parties . . Conference between contracting parties. Negotiations between parties . . II " " .. Men secured employment else where. Result. In favour of employees . In favour of employees . May IT. Sept. 26. •June 1. Not reported II In favour of employees . . . . In favour of employees . . . Strikers generally success- ful. In favour of employers Not reported In favour of employers . . . In favour of employees Strikers generally success ful. In favour of employees Employees generally suc- cessful. In favour of employees Not reported In favour of employers.. Strikers partially siiccess- ful. In favour of employers Strikers generally success- ful. In favour of employers.. In favour of employees.. Compromise.. Some employers granted demands. Compromise S a o •Tune 4. Apr. 6. July 4. June 4 . June 1 . June 1 . Nov. 1. Aug. 7. July 1. June 29. Mar. 13. Sept. 30. May 1 .' Sept. 10. July 5. June 3. June 15. Aug. 1. May 1. Jan. 27. July 15. May 1. July 2. Apr. 1 . .Tuly 22. July 1. May 1. June 6. In favi:^ur of employers.. Compromise In favour of employers.. ■Tune 3 , May 1. Aug 1. May 24 Oct. 17., June 6. July -. May — . Aug. 5 . June — . Aug. 24. June 2. Dec. — .. Sept. --. Aug. — . Aug. 10. Mar. 18. Oct. 2. May 4. Sept. 18. Aug. 13. June — . July — . Aug. 7. May 4. Feb. 3. July 22. July -. Oct. — . Apr. 22. •July 31. July 3. May 1. July 16. June 17. •June 1 . Sept. 7. 11 30 63 13 5 40 20 26 3 8 18 * 30 4 5 3 10 ^ 175 150 164 49 15 175 54 400 65 30 28 20(' 2,000 30 65 325 - 325 1,212 200 30 66 8 250 70 160 30 40 95 100 15 8 30 * Not reported. Bight employees signed agreement. 28163— 3J 36 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1912 Occupation. Cause or Object. Building Trades — (Continued.) Plumbers flumberd . Plumbers . Plumbers . Windsor and Walker- viUe, Ont. Port Arthur, Ont Saskatuon, Sask. Victoria, B.C... For higher wages, recognition of union and restriction as to apprentices. For higher wages and shorter hours To enforce rules governing apprentices . Grranite cutters , Stonecutters Marble setters' helpers . Tile layers Quebec, Que Calgary, Alta Vancouver, B.C. Montreal, Que . . , For increase in wages Classification of work For increase in wages.. ..^ For higher wages and shorter hours.. Tile layers Structural iron workers. Structural iron workers. . Toronto, Ont. Toronto, Ont. . Wipnipeg, Man. Structural iron workers. Hoist engineers Builders' labourers Builders' labourers . Builders' labourers Metal Trades- Iron moulders. Edmonton, Alta Winnipeg, Man Gait, Hespeler and Pres- ton, Ont. Brandon, Man Laggan, Alta For recognition of union Against employment of particular persons.. . . * For Saturday afternoon off during the whole year. For higher wages and shorter hours For higher wages , For higher wages Against employment of particular persons. Iron moulders. . Iron moulders . Iron moulders . Moncton, N.B. Montreal, Que. Montreal, Que. Lachine, Que . . Against reduction of wages. Iron moulders Iron moulders, machinists and ^blacksmiths. Ottawa, Ont Sault Ste-Marie, Ont . Sympathetic For increase in wages . . For increase in wages. For reduction of working hours Union alleged reduction of overtime rates and lockout in case of machinists, etc., for refusing to do unnecessary Sunday work. Iron moulders. Coremakers . . . Peterborough, Ont . . St. Catharines, Ont.. For reduction of working hours Against employment of female coremakers. . . . Iron moulders , Iron moulders knd coremakers Iron moulders . Steel workers . Steel and iron workers. Steel workers Hamilton, Ont . . . WalkerviUe, Ont Waterloo, Ont. Montreal, Que. Ottawa, Ont . . Hamilton, Ont. Machinists ISt. John, N.B . For higher wages j For shorter hours and recognition of union. For increase in wages Against reduction of wages For change of pay day and other demands.. For increase in wages For higher overtime rates . STMKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PERIOD 1911-1916— ConMnwe^. 1912 37 Method of Settlement. Men secured employment else where. Some employers signed agree- ment. Men obtained employment else- where. Unsettled at end of year Generally in favour of em- ployers. In favour of employees... In favour of employer.. Agreement reached between parties. Particulars not reported . '. . Negotiations between parties . Men returned to work on condi- tion a new agreement was made. i^reement reached Majority of strikers' places fill- ed, some returned to work. Conference between representa- tives of parties. By arbitration Particulars not reported Majority of men returned at in- creased rate, others obtained employment elsewhere. Negotiations between parties . . Strikers were replaced In favour of employer. Not reported In favour of employees Strikers partially success- ful. Not reported In favour of employer Compromise Agreement reached between parties. Not reported Strikers' places filled, accordiuer to company's statement. Agreement signed between par- ties. Men returned to work . .' Unsettled at end of year ; sev eral men, however, - had re- turned to work and about 75 were still out of employment, Agreement made between strik- ers and individual contractors. Some men returned to work others obtained employment elsewhere. Negotiations between parties. . Strikers* places filled with non- union men. Negotiations between parties . . Some men returned to work at reduced rates, others' places were filled. Negotiations between parties Conference between parties Strikers replaced Results. Particulars not reported. . , In favour of employers Compromise In favour of employees.. In favour of employer . . In favour of employees.. Not reported In favour of employer In favour of employees Strikers partially successful. Strikers partially success- ful. In favour of employer In favour of employees . In favour of employers. Compromise In favour of employer.. Compromise ;. . . Strikers partially success- ful. In favour of employer June 24. June 1. June 1 . Dec. 4. Aug. 19. June 4 . Nov. 23. Sept. 17. Oct. 2. Feb, 16. Mar. 9. Oct. 1. June 9. May 1. Aug. 15. Oct. — , July — June — Aug. 29 Dec. .15 Oct. 10 Oct. 7 .Jan. 29. Feb. 5. Aug. 12. Aug. 22. June 3. Nov. 10. May 13. May 3 May 7 July 11. Nov. 18. .Jan. 20. Mar. 16. Aug. 26. Oct. 7.,|nov. I H "S Mar. 12 Nov. 21 July 20 May 15 Aug, 21 May 30 May 17. Aug. — .. Aug. 26.. Oct. 15., ■a ji ."* * ee a BO S M S .§ o o •A May — . May — . May 13. Aug. — . Nov. 21, Jan. 29, I *! 1 a c Mar. 20, Aug. 28. 10 8 , 1 10 1 50 14 20 1 585 44 12 150 65 30 28 45 100 40 209 65 175 140 275 279 8,465 90 40 . 20 12 32 200 26 32 2? 12 180 200 210 38 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDTJSTKIAL DISPUTES 1912 Occupation, Metal Trades— {Continued.) Machinists ; . . Electrical workere. Electrical workers. Electrical workers. Electrical workers . Linemen Linemen Stovemakers . Blacl^smiths . Boilermakers . Sheet.metal workers. Sheet metal workers. Sheet metal workers. Wiredrawers Printing and Allied Trades - Printers Printers Bookbinders . Textiles- Silk weavers . Clothing— Tailors . Tailors Coat pressers Garment workers . . . Garment workers . . . Garment workers . . . Cloak makers . Cloak makers . Cloak makers Locality. Ottawa, Ont. Ottawa, Ont Moose Jaw, Sask.. Saskatoon, Sask . . . Calgary, Alta. . . Winnipeg, Man. Regina, Sask... . Hamilton, Ont. Ottawa, Ont. Halifax, N.S. Ottawa, Ont .... Saskatoon, Sask . . Edmonton, Alta. Hamilton, Ont . . Woodstock, Ont . . Edmonton, Alta. Montreal, Que. Montreal, Que. Toronto, Ont Calgary, Alta. . .,. . Hamilton, Ont Montreal, Que . . . Montreal, Que Toronto, Ont.. Montreal, Que, Toronto, Ont . . . Toronto, Ont. Cause or Object. For higher wages For higher wages and recognition of union. . . . For higher wages For higher wages and shorter hours For increase in wages For higher wages For higher wages and shorter hours Against reduction of wages For increase of wages and other changes For higher overtime rates For higher wages M . / II Objection to employment of aliens For closed shop Failure to reach agreement regarding scale of wages and recognition of union. For higher wages, shorter hours and higher overtime rates. Against employment of particular persons . Failure to reach new agreement involving in- crease in wages. For higher wages and recognition of union. . . . Misunderstanding with foreman as to overtime payment. For higher wages, shorter hours and to enforce ' other demands. Alleged unsanitary conditions of employment. Objection to employment of man at higher rate than discharged employee. Sympathetic Failure to reach agreement involving recogni- tion of union. Against discharge of employees STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 39 IN THE PERIOD 1911-1916— Continued. 1912 g i 1 s a § ■s a g 1 1 s s ra Method of Settlement. Result. S 1 J 1 _a 6 t l-g i S "o S ee d8 s d 3 » 1* ( Q a ^ IZi ^ H Men returned to work pending In favour of employees May 21.. May 23.. 1 39 78 negotiations. NeeotiationB between parties . . II II . . .July 18.. Aug. 25.. 21 120 3,360 Negotiations between parlies . . II II . . July 24.. Aug. 2. . 33 264 Men returned to work pending II II . . Nov. 1.. Nov. 3.. i 45 90 settlement through Concilia- tion Board. Negotiations between parties . . II II .. Oct..., 1.. Oct. 6.. 12 60 300 Particulars not reported II II . . June 27 . . July 3.. 1 75 375 Men resumed work pending ar- II II . . Nov. 1 . . Nov. 5. . 1 150 60 rangement of schedule. Strikers obtained employment elsewhere. Negotiations between parties. . In favour of employer Mar. 1.. Sept, -, . 1 13 2,184 Strikers partly successful . . Mar. 23.. Mar, 28,, 1 55 275 Men returned to work pending settlement by Marine Depart- In favour of employees July 6.. Tuly 13,. 1 10 60 ment. Negotiations between parties , . In favour of employers Aug. 23.. Aug. 24,. 8 100 100 Particulars not reported Strikers partially success- Sept. 3.. Sept. 13.. 17 60 540 ful. 19 118 354 Negotiations between parties . . In favour of employees Nov. 11.. Nov. 14. . Work resumed unconditionally. In favour of employer In favour of employers April 24.. July 11.. April 29.. Sept. — .. 1 640 2,560 110 2,687 32,525 Strikers' places filled 2 30 1,200 Work resumed pending formu- Not reported April 2.. Aprill2.. 9 28 252 lation of agreement by joint committee from both sides. Some firms conceded demands Strikers generally suocest- Sept. 14.. Sept. — .. 21 250 2,250 and employees of others re- turned to work without any concessions. ful. 32 308 3.702 Negotiations between parties . . Strikers partially auccess- fuU. Sept. 10.. Mar. 4.. Sept. 21.. ] 106 1,166 1 106 1.166 -Unsettled at end of year 21 550 28,450 1,500 24 Not reported Strikers partially success- April 1.. June — . . 4 30 Conference between parties ful. In favour of employees Feb. 14.. Feb. 17.. 1 8 Conference between parties. . . . Some strikers returned, others' Indefinite .Tune 10 July 27.. Dec. — ,. 12 4,500 22 143,500 660 In favour of employer Nov. 14., 1 places were filled. Men returned to work pending settlement. Strikers' places filled II II May 15.. June 15.. 1 55 1,485 In favour of employer .,-... Feb, 27., April — . . .Jan. 28— 1 64 3,328 1,080 120,000 Negotiations between parties. . . Some returned, others' places filled. Dora promise Jan, 8 , , X fin In favour of employer Feb. 14.. Aug. -.. 1 882 40 DEPARTMENT OF liABOUR^ CANADA 4. -DETAILS OF INDUSTEIAL DISPUTES 1912 Occupation. Locality. Cause or object. CTo*fej>ij/— (Continued. ) Cloak makers Cap makers Cap makers Boot and shoe workers .> Boot and shoe workers. . Boot and shoe workers . Shoe lasters Leather cutters Shirt and collar makers . Shirt ironers Food, Liquors and Tobacco — Bakers Cigarmakers . General Transport- Trackmen Freight handlers Freight handlers Freight handlers Freight handlers Freight handlers Machinists and boilermakers. Coal handlers Dock labourers . Longshoremen . . Teamsters .... Teamsters Teamsters , Teamsters.. Miscellaneous — Barbers Hotel waiters Brickmakers . Gas workers Toronto, Ont... Truro, N.S.- . Montreal, <,iue. Three Rivers, Que. Toronto, Ont For higher wages , For increase in wages For increase in wages and employment unionists only. Against employment of non-union men. . . Against employment of particular person. . of Toronto, Ont Against reduction of wa^es. . . Kitchener, Ont For better working conditions. Quebec, Que St. Johns, Que. Hamilton, Ont. Montreal, Que. Stratford, Ont. Merritton, Niagara Falls, Ont. C.P.K Montreal, Que Brantford, Ont Port McNichol, Ont.... Fort William, Ont Westport, Ont. to Edson, Alta. Port Arthur, Ont Fort William, Ont Vancouver, B.C Ottawa, Ont Windsor, Walkerville, Sandwich, Ont. Hamilton. Ont Edmonton, Alta Halifax, N.S. Montreal, Que. Hamilton, Ont. Toronto, Ont. ; testers , Montreal, Que Dispute aa to measurement of work providing for piece-work payment. For higher wages and other For increase in "wages For higher wages and to enforce other demands For higher wages For increase in wages. Refusal of Company to consider application for schedule of wages and conditions. For higher wages and better working con- ditions. For higher wages For increase in wages Failure to reach agreement as to hours, wages and conditions of employment. Alleged discrimination against union men and demand for higher wages and other changes. For higher wages Against employment of non-unionist For higher wages For higher wages Strikers complained of long hours without extra pay; and of a system of fines. For higher wages Some men were laid off and others stijpped work. For higher wages and shorter hours STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-1916— Cow^mwed 1912 41 Method of Settlement. Negotiations between parties . n II Places of some of the strikers filled. Strikers' places filled Men retumej to work uncondi- tionally. Particulars not reported Conference between parties .... Through efforts of the Bureau of Conciliation and Arbitra- tion. Places of strikers filled Not reported Result. Compromise Indefinite In favour of employer. Not reported In favour of employees.. Compromise In favour of employer , Compromise Majority of strikers returned to work under old conditions. Conference between parties . . Strikers' places filled . Unsettled at end of year Some strikers were taken back others' places were filled. Some men were taken back at old rate; others' places filled Men resumed work pending set- tlement. Men returned to work at old sc^le Conference arranged by Mm. ister of Labour. Not reported Negotiations between parties . . II 11 . . Particulars not reported Conferencd between parties Negotiations'between parties . . . Not reported Places of strikers filled. Particulars not reported . Majority returned to , work; places of others filled. No definite settlement made at the end of the year; one em- ployer granted the men's de- mands, and others filled places of strikers. In favour of employers. In favour of employees. . In favour of employer In favour of employers. , In favour of employer . . Not reported In favour of employer . . Compromise In favour of employees.. Compromise In favour'of employees , Not reported Compromise . Jan. 9. Oct. 10. Nov. 4. Oct. 21. Mar. 27. Oct. 26. Aug. 9. June 27. Strikers partially successful In favour of employer.. . . In favour of employees . In favour of employe!.. . In favour of employers . July 4. Aug. 3-6. Q Jan. Nov. Dec. Nov. Mar. Deo. Aug. July 10.. 2. I 9. 28.. 31. 12.. 3.. May 1.. May 6 Apr. Nov. July April June Aug. Oct. July Aug. Oct. Aug. April May Sept. 12.. 17. 19. 20. 10. 1911 29.. 7.. 14.. 16.. 22.. 1. 24. June 20.. Mar. 2. . May 11.. June 18.. Dec. 2. July 6 . Aug. 13-16 June May Aug. April 22 June Aug. 24 Dec. 13 Aug. 5 Aug. 13. Oct. 17. Aug. 18. May 3. Sept. 26. July Mar. 3. May 18. June 29. Dec. 65 10 63 a a 25 19 ■175 44 6,738 IS 1,000 160 30 300 1,600 300 250 250 100 40 50 60 200 4,359 36 165 30 42 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1912 Occupation^ Miscellaneous — (Continued. ) Moving picture operators . Stage employees Musiciaiis Automol^ile painters Pulpniill hands Unskilled Labour — Railway labourers Labourers Labourers . . Labourers Labourers Railway labourers Labourers Railway labourers Railway labourers Toronto, Ont. . . London, Ont , . . Toronto, Ont Walkerville, Ont St, George, N.B Richmond, Ont. Ottawa, Ont Guelph, Ont Edmonton, Alta. Saskatoon, Sask. . Prince Rupert and New Hazelton, B. C. Victoria, B.C Skeena River Crossing, B.O. Between Hope and Kara- loops, B.C. Cause or Object. For higher wages _ • Against reduction in stafiE and later the dis- missal. of a master mechanic. For higher wages For change in piece-work schedule For higher wages and shorter hours For higher wages ti II .. . ^. . ,- . H For higgler wages and better working condi- tions. For increase in wages For better conditions For higher wages 1913 Fishing — Halibut fishermen Salmon fishermen. Lumbering— Scowmen ' . . . Lumber shippers . . Mill hands Mining — Coal miners . . , . Coal miners .... Gold miners Vancouver andNew West- minster, B.C. Fraser River, B.C St. John, N.B.. Miramichi, N.B, St. John, N.B. .. Vancouver Island, B.C. Taber, Alta. ... Porcupine, Out.. For higher wages -Against reduction of wages For higher wages For higher wag;es Lookout following demand for higher wages . Alleged discrimination againet employees; later for recognition of the union. Company objected to men forming union. Against reduction of wages STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 "IN THE PEEIOD 1911-191B— Continued. 1912 43 Method of Settlement. B«sult. 1 g s 1 1 1 •s 1 1 S g s 1 ■ sl 6 S Z 1 09 ■p. bo a 1 1? / TJnsettled at end of year Oct. 26.. 70 1 '"] 1 100 14 70 15 ■ 52 t 2,700 Negotiations between parties . . Negotiations between parties.. Strikers' places filled -. . Strikers generally success- ful. Compromise In favour of employer Company claimed to be not affected. In favour of employer Strikers partially successful In favour of employer Strikers partially successful In favour of employees Not reported Oct. 31., Aug. 17 . Nov. 3.. April 6.. 1911 Aug. 22.. July 10.. .Tuly 4.. Sept. 27.. Aug. July 15.. April 12 . Jan. April 1.. Nov. i. . Sept. 2. . Nov. . . Mar. 1912 Aug. 29.. July 13.. July . . Oct. 3.. 42 910 1,500 ^ 100 589 8,028 Men secured other employment Negotiations between parties . Some men returned at old scale; others' places were filled. Negotiations between parties . . Some men left locality; others were given increase Particulars not reported Work resumed without negotia- tions. Particulars not reported Majority of men returned to work; places of others filled. 1 2 1 1 98 1,000 40 250 250 3,000 350 150 6,000 588 3,000 200 1,250 Aug. 15.. April 20. . Jan. June 15 . . 1 1 1 12 81,000 In favour of employer 2,450 750 In f avojir of employers Grand Total . . . 360,000 20 11, 138 449,238 989 40,511 1,099,208 1913 Negotiations between parties . . Strikers returned to work .... Compromise In favour of employers In favour of employees Strikers partly successful.. . In favour of employers Nov. 1-12 Aug. 3 . Dec. 30-12 April 29.. June 13.. Sept. 17-12 Oct. 15.. Nov. 15-12 Mar. Aug. Jan. May Sept. Nov. June 29.. 5.. 8 7.. 30 . 15.. 14.. 9 25 ■ 34 600 2,000 45,600 4,000 2,600 200 250 1,550 49,600 Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. Strikers returned to work 7 11 1,200 1,250 134,850 18 2,000 137,300 4 1 25 3,500 37 500 588,000 Negotiations between parties. . Strike called off by union In favour of employees In favour of employers 1,036 24,800 44 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTEIAL DISPUTES 1913 Occupation. Miming — (Contiuued.) Silver miners Metal miners Quartz miners Asbestos miners. . . . Building Trades — BricMayers and masons Bricklayers and masons Plasterers Plasterers' labourers Carpenters Carpenters Carpenters t Carpenters Carpenters and ship caulkers . . Carpenters Carpenters Carpenteis Carpenters'. Painters Painters Painters Painters Plumbers Plumbers Plumbers Plumbers Plumbers, Plumbers Plumbers Stone cutters Granite cutters Granite cutters Structural iron workers Tile layers Builders' labourers Building trades Metal Trades — Iron moulders. , Iron moulders. . Iron moulders. . Iron moulders. . Iron moulders. . Iron moulders. . Cobalt, Ont Sheep Creek and Salmo, B.C. Britannia Beach, B.C. . . Black Lake, Que Regina, Sask Calgary, Alta Ottawa, Ont Toronto, Ont Sydney, N.S Halifax, N.S St. John. N.B Quebec, Que Montreal, Que Montreal, Que Toronto, Ont . . Welland, Ont Brandon, Man .... Montreal, Que . . . Hamilton, Ont Winnipeg, Man. Victoria, B.C.... . St. Catharines, , Ont Welland, Ont. ... Moosejaw, Ont Saskatoon, Sask. Medicine Hat, Alta Calgary, Alta Victoria, B.C St. John, N.B .... Vancouver, B.C Victoria, B.C Toronto, Ont Winnipeg, Man. . . Quebec, Que Nelson, B.C Against discharge of employee. For higher wages Sackville, N.B. Montreal, Que.. Toronto,' Ont St. <'atharine8, Ont.. Hamilton, Ont Brautf ord, Ont For recognition of union. For higher wages Cause or Object. Dispute over classification of work For higher wages For higher wages and shorter hours For higher wagps For shorter hours For higher wages For shorter hours ^ For higher wages „ For higher wages' For higherwages. . . . : For higher wages For recognition of union For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages and shorter hours For higher wages Dispute as to number of apprentices to be employed. For higher wages and shorter hours For higher wages Sympathetic For higher wages and shorter hours Fof higher wages ; For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For shorter hours For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages Firms refused to cancel contract for Hamilton firm whose employees were on strike. STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-in6—0 oniinued. 1913 45 Method of Settlement. Strikers returned to work . . . Open shop declared; operations ceased for a time. Strike called oflf by union. . . Strikers returned to work . . . Work completed Negotiations between parties. . . ^feKOtiations between parties. . . Negotiations between parties. . . Negotiations between parties. . . Negotiations between parties. . . Strikers returned to work Strikers obtained work else- where. Strikers returned to work Strikers' places filled Negotiations between parties. . Some strikers returned to work; others secured employment elsewhere. Strikers' places filled Negotiations between parties. Negotiations between parties , Negotiations between parties . Negotiations between parties . Negotiations between parties . Not reported Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. . Strikers returned to work Negotiations between parties. . Strike called off by union Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. . . Increase granted to Vancouver strikers. Negotiations between parties. . Men obtained higher rate with other contractors. Strikers' places filled Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between pVirties. . . Two firms granted demands; employees of others returned to work. Negotiations between parties. . . Not reported Strike called off by Union Negotiations between parties. . . Result. In favour of employers. Indefinite In favour of employers. In favour of employers. In favour of employer. , . . In favour of employees . . Compromise Compromise Compromise Strikers partly successful . In favour of employers. . . In favour of employer In favour of employers . . . In favour of employers. , . Strikers generally successful In favour of employers. . . . In f avflur of employer . . . In favour of employees. . In favour of employers . . Compromise Compromise Compromise In favour of employees . . Compromise In favour of employers . In favour of employers . . Compromise In favour of employers. . In favour of employees . . In favour of employees . ! In favour of employees , . Compromise Indefinite In favour of employers. . Indefinite Compromise Strikers partly successful. , Compromise Increase granted In favour of employers. , In favour of employees. S o Mar. 22. Feb. 22. Feb 19. April 16. June July Aug. May May April May May April July June ■Tune Feb. April April April Mar. Feb. Aug. May June April •June Deo. 12.. 15.. 1.. 1.. 1.. 1.. 1.. 26.. 16.. 21.. 2.. 10.. 15.. 1.. 1.. 1.. 1.. 1.. 10.. 2.. 1.. 2. 4-12 July 10.. Aug. 1.. Aug. 16. . May 1 . . April 11.. July 19.. May 1 . . •lune 2. Aug. 4 . May 5. . June 25. Mar. 26., June 2. . April 3. Aug. 27. April 20. June 22. Aug. 2. Sept. 16. May 26. May 28. May 12. May 5. May 31. April 26. July 31. June 7. June 10. Feb. 20. April 17. May 1. April 2«. July 11. Mar. 27. Aug. ■Tune 15. July 5. April 21. July 7. Jan. 7 July 22 Aug. 27 Aug. 27 July April July 23 Uay 18 .Aug. 7. Sept. 17. May 7. July 9. Aug. 25. July 2. (5 35 1 41 14 30 2 50 1 1 1 1 250 1 1 25 20 100 5 661 .2 O 100 44 500 400 5,081 10 772 40 300 61 240 12 10 20 100 3,000 50 30 300 100 750 65 40 Ifi 45 98 45 250 120 10 80 55 250 33 110 300 7,222 260 250 370 34 27fi 36 46 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTEIAL DISPUTES. 1913 Occupation. Metal Trades — (Continued.) Iron moulders Iron moulders Iron moulders Iron moulders Iron moulders Coremakers Foundrymen Machinists Machinists, blacksmiths, etc. . . Electrical workers Electrical workers Electrical workers Electrical workers Electrical workers Electrical workers Electri<'al workers Electrical workers Linemen Boilermakers Boilermakers and iron ship builders. • Sheet metal workers Hnrseshoers /. Wiredrawers Woodworking Trades — Woodworkers Photo engravers Cabinet makers Textiles — Textile workers Textile workers Twine and cordage workers Clothing — Tailors Garment workers Garment workers Garment workers Locality. Guelph, Ont. Gait, Ont. . . . Gait, Ont Sault Ste Marie, Ont. Owen Sound, Ont. Hamilton, Ont. . . . St. Catharines, Ont.. Ottawa, Ont" Ottawa, Ont. . . . Toronto, Ont. . . Hamilton, Ont Hamilton, Ont Hamilton, Ont Brantford, Ont Regina, Sask Kdmonton, Alta Vancouver and Victoria, B.C. Toronto, Ont Toronto, Ont. . . Esquimau, B.C. Edmonton, Alta. Toronto, Ont. . . . Hamilton, Ont. . . St. John, N.B. Toronto, Ont. . Toronto, Ont. . Montmorency, Que. . Montreal, Que Doon, Ont . Winnipeg, Man. Montreal, Que... Montreal, Que... Toronto, Ont. . . Discharge of employee For re-arrangement of pay day For higher wages and snorter hours. For shorter hours.. For higher wages. . Cause or Object. For higher wages Men refused to do work on material for Hamil- ton firm whose employees were on strike. For higher wages Lockout. Men refused to work on Sunday, and claimed reduction of overtime rate. Refusal to employ members of Union. For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages For weekly payment of wages. For higher wages For higher wages and other changes. For higher wages and other changes. For higher wages, shorter hours and recog- nition of Union. i For higher wages and shorter hours For higher wages. . Against reduction of wages For higher wages and shorter hours. For higher wages For higher wages For reoognitibn of Union For higher wages and shorter hours. . For higher wages. For higher wages. For higher wages. , For higher wages Dismissal of employees A gainst reduction of wages Alleged discrimination against unionists . STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 'IN THE PERIOD 1911-1916— Oontmued. 1913 47 Method of Settlement. One firm granted increase. The other closed moulding shop. Strike called off when Hamilton dispute enijed. Negotiations between parties. . . Some returned to work, others secured employment else- where. Men severed connection with Union and resumed work. Strikers returned to work Negotiations between parties. . . Men returned to work pending investigation. Conferences arranged by De- partment of Labour. Negotiations between parties. . . Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. . Men returned to work Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. . •Conferences between patties . . Conferences betwfeen parties . . Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations Conference between parties .... Employers individually signed agrsemonis. Some returned to work, others' places filled. ' Strikers returned to work Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. . Mediation Some raturned to work, places of others filled. Strikers returned to work Neeotiations between parties. Strikers returned to work. Unsettled at end of year .... Company promised to allow nO discrimination by contractor Strikers partly successful . In favour of employees In favour of employees. , In favour of employers. . [n favour of employer . In favour of employer In favour of employees Strikers partly successful . . Compromise Partyincrease granted, fur- ther increase given after arbitration. Comproniise Compromise , Compromise In favour of employers. . . . Increase granted Compromise Some demands granted Compromise. Strikers partly successful . Compromise Men partly successful . . In favour of employees. In favour of employers. In favour of employers. In favour of employers. Compromise In favour of employers. In favour of employers. In favour of employers Part increase granted. . In favour of employer . In favour of employees, May May May 17 Nov. 11-12 April 4 . Feb. 27. May 2. Jan. 2. Feb. 13. May 29. April 1 . April 20 . May 1. May 30 May 26. July 7. Mar. 15. May 8. June 4. April 23. Jan. 15 . June 16. April 15. May 1. Jan. ,27. May 1. Mar. 7. May 10. Feb. 2*0. April 1 . Aug. n. Sept. 19. Feb. 10. § H o .2 i d S ^5 , O ■a. Sept. -. 2 25 Aug. 25.. 1 U Sept. 30.,. Jan, 29.. 1 1 39 60 April 14.. 1 17 Mar. 6:. May 5. , Jan. 9.. 1 1 1 50 550 40 Feb. 24.. 1 96 May 31. 1 300 April 10.. May 5. . May 9.. June 3. . May 30.. July 19.. Mar. 22.. 1 1 5 1 2 15 1 20 10 125 58 35 150 200 May 23.. Julv 10. May 12.. 2 6 1 250 4,S0 175 Mar. 1.. July 30.. ' 16 18 115 90 April 26. . May 31.. Sept. 23.. July 26.. Mar. 12.. May 17.. 1 12 109 4,084 3 4 40 70 80 400 47 550 1 1 459 821 Feb. 25.. April 22.. Aug. 16., Feb.' is!. 1 99 3 1,379 1 3 1 175 15 1,000 40 79,479 1,500 12,520 16,C00 30,020 48 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1913 Occupation. Clothing — (Continued.) Garment workers Garment workers Garment workers Garment workers Shoe machine workers Boot and Shoe workers . . . . Food, Liquors and Tobacco — Bakers Cigarmaker.s Cigarmakers Cigarmakers Cigarmakers General Transport-r- Freight clerks, etc iSectionmen Steamboat firemen Street Railway employees. Street Railway employees, Teamsters Teamsters .■ Teamsters Miscellaneous — Barbers Quarry workers Theatre employees Bill posters Glass workers Unskilled Labour — Labourers Labourers Labourers . Labourers Labourers Railway labourers Railway labourers Locality. Toronto, Ont. . . . Toronto, Ont. .. Hamilton, Ont.. . Vancouver. B.C. Quebec, Que Toront9, Ont . . . Winnipeg, Man. Montreal, Que . . Toronto, Ont. . . London, Ont Montreal, Que . C.P.R St. Thomas, Ont Charlottetown, P.E.I.. For higher wages Dismissal of employees and alleged discrimina- tion against unionists. For higher wages For shorter hours .■■■.- ■•( Refusal to work with non-unionists. Halifax, N.S Port Arthur and Fort William, Out. Montreal, Que. Belleville, Ont. Toronto, Ont. St. John, N.B Hants Co., N.S.... Peterborough, Ont. Montreal, Que Toronto, Ont. Quebec, Que Montreal, Que Peterborough, Ont . . . Hamilton, Ont . . , . Port Arthur, Ont Penticton, B,C Between Newport and Lillooett, B.C. Cause or Object. For higher wages. For recognition of union and other changes . . . For dismissal of foreman and better working conditions. Sympathetic For supervision of engagement of new em- ployees. Against reduction of wages Refusal of company to consider application for rules and rates of pay. Against reduction of wa^es For rearrangement of shifts For higher wages For reinstatement of discharged employee . F6r higher wages . For higher wages . For higher wages . For shorter hours For higher wages and shorter hours For recognition of union Difference with management over amount paid by employees into union. For higher wages .' For shorter hours For higher wages and shorter hours . . For higher wages For higher wages For higher wages FQr higher wages and other changes . Against reduction of wages STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-1916— Continued. 1913 49 Method of Settlement. Result. I ^ B 00 S . o o o o «3 Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties. Unsettled at end of year Negotiations between parties. . Negotiations between parties . . Negotiations between parties.. Increase granted . ,. . . Part increase granted. . Compromise Compromise. Strikers generally success- ful. Compromise Montreal dispute ended.. Strikers returned to work . Compromise In favour of employer. Unsettled at end of year. Men ordered by anion to return to work. Mediation Investigation by officers of Marine Department. Negotiations between parties. Some strikers returned to work others secured employment elsewhere. Mediation Strikers' places filled Negotiations between parties . . Negotiations between parties . . Negotiations between parties . . Strikers' places filled Strikers' places filled ; higher wages and shorter hours granted later. Employers individually granted demands. In favour of employers. Mar. 18 April 15.. April 16. . Aug. 9. . Dec. 19.. Apr. 25.. May 1 . . Oct. 27 . Oct. 30.. Jan. 2r.. Dec. 13.. Nov. 4-12 In favour of employers. Some were conceded de- mands; places of others filled. Part increase granted . In favour of employers In favour of employers New men were given in- crease demanded. Compromise July Jan. May 16. May 10 ApiUie. April 10. April 16. Demands granted In favour of employees In favour of employers . . . Strikers partly successful . . In favour of employees . . Negotiations between parties Strikers returned to work . . Strikers' places filled ... . Strikers returned to work . . Strikers' places filled Strikers returned to work . . Strikers returned to work . . 28163-4 In favour oi In favour of In favour of In favour of In favour of In favour of In favour of employers employers . employers . employers . employers . employers, employers . July 28.. April 21.. Feb. 14.. Feb. 27.. 1.. April 28.. Oct. 21.. April 28. . Sept. 18.. April 14. . May 3.. Nov. 5 . Grand total. Mar. 24.. June 17. . April 28.. Sept. 29.. May 6. . June 30.. Nov. 22.. Nov. 22.. Feb. 26.. Feb. 1. July 15. Jan. 5 . May 20. June 10. April 24. April 14. April 21. Aug. 8. May 7. Feb. ... April 30. June 10. May 2. Oct. 23. April 30. Sept. 21. May 9. May lO. Nov. 12. 2,200 200 2,000 21 4,000 75 56 9,726 150 290 150 50 110 16 750 500 400 18 200 85 300 14 400 11 1,917 10 514 10 54 18 596 500 600 41 250 250 400 1,500 3,541 1,015 39,536 1,287,678 50 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTEIAL DISPUTES 1914 L "Occupation. Locality. Cause or Object. Mvai-n^ — Vancouver Island, B.C. Nordegfif, Alta Alleged discrimination against employees r Operations suspended pending negotiations for Goal ]VIin()rs . . * .' . Cobalt, Ont an agreement. For reduction of working hours Building Trades — Bricklayers Bricklayers and Masons Bricklayers Edmpntoijj Alta Edmonton, Alta Montreal, Que Tjondon, Ont intendent. Failure on part of company to carry out agree- ment providing for an increase of 5c. per hour after September 15. For increased wages . . - Carpenters For increased wages and shorter hours For increased wages and recognition of union. Against reduction of wages Carpenters Carpenters Marble Settlers Banff, Altsi; Toronto, Ont Painters Brantford, Ont For increased wages For increased wages Dispute as to whether plasterers should be allowed to do special work. For increased wages For increased wages and recognition of union. Against reduction of wages Faioters St. Thomas, Ont Winnipeg, Man Plasterers Plumbers Halifax, M.S... Metal Trades: — Coremakers Brantford, Ont Electric linemen Electrical workers man. For increased wages Against reduction of wages Against reduction of wages Against redviction of wages «,.'.. Machinists Amherst. N.S. Moulders Smith's Falls, Ont Owen Sound, Ont Owen- Sound, Ont St. John, N.B Moulders ... Moulders Nail makers , Regarding bonus for efficiency HoUing mill employees Amherst, N.S Against reduction of wages Against employment of non-unioni-st Against reduction of wages Jurisdictional between carpenters and sheet metal workers. Sheet metal workers , . . Toronto, Ont Sheet metal workers i. . Amherst, N.S Sheet metal workers Toronto, Ont STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-1916— Continued. 1914 5t Method of Settlement. At a meeting of the unionB at Nanaimo, the strike was He- clare.d off. Negotiations between parties . . Strikers returned to work Men returned to work Contractors agreed to pay the increase. Men returned to work at 70c. per hour. Referred to Board of Concilia- tion under Industrial Dis- putes Investigation Act. Men returned to work Contractors agreed to pay wages as laid down by union . Men returned to work pending final' settlement at head quarters. Men gradually broke away and union decided to go back to work. Negotiations between parties Settlement, brought about by the Minister of Public Works. Negotiations between parties . . Men retumsd to work at former rate of pay. Negotiations between parties. Men returned to work Some returned to work and others were promised their places back as soon as vac- ancies occurred. Unsettled at end of year. ... . Unsettled at end of year Unsettled at end of year Men accepted out in wages Men returned to work Negotiations between parties . . Negotiations between parties . . Men returned to work at origi nal rates. Unsettled at end of year Result. In favour of employers . In favour of employees. In favour of employers. . Compromise In favour of employees . . . Compromise. Men returned to work at old terms, pending board's decision. Agreement signed later on terms favourable to employees. In favour of employers In favour of employees .... Indefinite. Strikers partly successful . . Compromise In favour of employees . . . Part increase granted Compromise Compromise In favour of employers. , . . In favour of employers . . . . In favour of employers In favour of employers.. . . Compromise Strikers returned to work. In favour of employers S i o Sept. 17 '12 May 1'13 June 10 . . Jan. 27.. Aug.19,14 July 1. . Tan. 29., Sept. 26. Sept. S2. June 16. June 1 . June 3. July 2. Sept. 29. Oct. 23. June 24, June 16. April 9. May 1. April 6. Nov. 3.- I.. June 8. . Feb. 17. Mar 9. June 27. May May Oct. Dec. June Mar April 24 M!ay 11. June 25. ^ July 30. July 3. April 25, July 6. April 7. Nov. 6. Aug. 29. July 13. Feb. 19. Mar. 16. Aug. 15. Dpc. 7. July 11. April 13, April 27. May 14 . o o i 1,000 900 7B 1,975 40 38 117 1,000 40 1 15 65 200 22 30 10 63 25 140 140 1,745 35 30 52 30 107 18 107 80 125 90 8 9U 28163— 4J 52 DEPARTMENT OP LABOUR, CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1914 Occupation. Metal trades — (Continued.) Ship builders Structural iron workers . . Riveters and car makers . Clothing — Garment workers Garment workers Garment workers Garment workers ........ Shoe machine workers Food, Liquors and Tobacco- Brewery workers Cigarmakers , Leather — Harness makers Trunk makers General Transport- Street railway men Miscellaneous — Barbers Bartenders . Stage hands Stage hands.. Victoria, B.C.. .. Quebec, Que Hamilton, Ont Montreal, Que Toronto, Ont Toronto, Ont Toronto, Ont Montreal, Que . . . . Montreal, Que . . . . Montreal, Que Gananoque, Ont . Toronto, Ont St. John, N.B.... Saskatoon, Sask . . . Fort William, Ont Montreal, Que , . . Ottawa, Ont ; Cause or Object. For higher wages For increased wages Against reduction of wages Against reduction of wages Against introduction of contract labour sys- tem. Alleged non payment of wages Agaiust introduction of contract labour sys- tem. Refusal of employees to work with non-union- ist; later objection to signing agreement governing conditions of employment. Demand for a minimum wage scale; shorter houi*s and recognition of union. Against reduction of wages Firms locked out employees who had recently formed union. Alleged discrimination against union men in laying off hands. Dismissal of members of union Against reduction of wages. . . . For recognition of union For increased wages For increased wages STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-J916 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-1916— Oontinued. 1914 53 Method of Settlement. Kesults. 1 6 "S s a § a S 1 ■s Q 1 a li ■1 o g Time Loss in Working- Days. Negotiations between parties. . Men secured work elsewhere. . . Conferences arranged by De- partment of Labour. Strikers siccepted compa- ny's terms. In favour of employers Indefinite In favour of employers .... Feb. 6.. May 23 . Mar. 27.,. Sept. 19.. 1913 Mar. 16.. April 23 . May 11.. Dec. 19.. 1913 Feb. 20.. May 27.. April 10.. Mar. 31.. 1914 Aug. 4 . . May 9.. Aug. 4.. Feb. 14,. 1914 1 1 1 175 36 80 1,925 72 800 15 938 52,373 Strikers secured work else- where. 1 1 1 1 15 350 100 30 45 3,000 26,950 -12,840 330 3,150 at outbreak of war. Strikers secured work elsewhere In favour of employers. . at outbreak war. Negotiations between parties . . Compromise . . ll7 OOO 19 3,525 160,270 1 1 18 35 3,105 7,015 Places of strikers filled In favour of employers In favour of employees In favour of employers In favour of employers In favour of employees In favour of employees In favour of employees In favour of employees Grand Total Dec. 13.. 1913 Mar. 2. . July 7.. July 22. Feb. 16.. May 1 . . Sept. 21 . Sept. 20.. Aug. 15. . 1914 April 14.. Aug. 18.. July 24.. Feb. 24.. May 2. . Oct. 31.. Oct. 31.. 2 53 10,120 2 1 30 35 1,080 1,190 3 66 2,270 All but one man returned to 1 150 300 1 - 150 300 Negotiations between parties. . Employers signed agreement. . . Part increase granted 4 l.S 2 1 12 52 25 13 70 52 875 468 Part increase granted 20 102 1,465 205 8,678 430,054 54 DEPARTMENT OF LAB( lUR, CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1915 Occupation. Mining Trades^ Coal miners.'. Ooal miners Coal miners Asbestos miners Coal miners Coal miners Building Trades — Plumbers and steamfitters Plasterers and plasterers' labourers. Plumbers and steamfitters. Plumbers and steamfitters Metal Trades — Machinists Moulders Sheet metal workers Moulders Ironworkers Ironworkers Iron moulders Labourers Boilermakers, ironworkers and helpers. Metal workers Machinists Westville, N.S. Westville, N.S. Springhill, N.S Thetford Mines, Que. Lovettville, Alta Drumheller, Alta. Victoria, B.C. Toronto, Ont Brandon, Man Port Arthur and Fort William, Ont. Amherst, N.S. Smith's Falls, Ont Toronto, Ont Owen Sound, Ont . Toronto, Ont Montreal, Que Peterborough,' Ont , Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.. . Halifax, N.S. New Glasgow and Tren- ton, N.S. New Glasgow, N.S Cause or Object. Increase in wages.. Increase in wages . Employment of particular persons. Increase in wages Increase in wages Higher pay for pushing coal cars long dis- tances. Against rf duction in wages. Employment of particular persons and for recognition of union. Reduction in wages Employers refused to sign new agreement . Reduction in wages . Reduction ia wages . Jurisdictional between carpenters and sheet metal workers. Reduction in wages Increase in wages In sympathy with members of International Brotherhood of Ironworkers on strike in United States. Reduction in wages Against reduction in wages and employment of particular persons. Demand for a minimum wage scale Result of misunderstanding Protest against emplovment of female labour and unsatisfactory shop conditions. STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PEEIOD 191U1916— Continued. 1915 55 Method of Settlement. Men returning to work on ques- tion being referred to con- ciliation. Conciliation Board under In- dustrial Disputes Investiga- tion Act agreed upon and men returned to work. Special precautions taken Conferences arranged by De- partment of Labour. •Men ajrreed to terms offered prior to strike, which meailt partial increase. Negotiations between parties Unsettled atend of year. . . . Dispute not officially "declared ott " but work where strike occurred completed. Employees accepted reduction Employers signed agreement and men returned to work. Result. Indefinite In favour of employees . In favour of employees . In favour of employees. 'No formal settlement, but number of men enlisted, others sought work else- where. , Strike-pay was dis- continued by the union. , Majority of former employees left locality and financial sup- port from union ceased. Men secured work elsewhere ; strike-pay discontinued. No agreement reached— strike dropped. -Strikers returned to work at old rates. Work completed and company not affected. -ased wages, recojfnitiou of union and better working conditions. Increased wages Increased wages ... , Increased wages ( ] . . , Increased wages STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-1916— ConimMed. 1916 61 Method of Settlement. Negotiations Negotiations -Negotiations Negotiations "Workers unconditionally re turned to work. Unsettled, December 31, 1916. Mediation !Non-unionistB dismissed . Mediation , Mediation Mediation . Mediation . Negotiations Conciliation . . Negotiations Negotiations . ., . . Negotiations... . -Negotiations Mediation Negotiations Negotiations Negotiations Unsettled December 31, 1916. , Negotiations ' 'Negotiations. Negotiations Negotiations Unsettled December 31, 1916. Unsettled December 31, 1916. Unsettled Dec. 31, 1916 In favour Of emplo.vees . In favour of eniployees . Compromise In favour of employees Compromise . Result. In favour of employers . Compromise. Compromise In favour of employers . In fsivour of employers-. Compromise . In favour of employers . . In favour of employees , . . In favour of employees. . . In favour of employees. . . In favour of employees. . . In favour of employees . . . Compromise In favour of employees . In favour of employees . Compromise ; . . . In favour of employees . In favour of employers . In favour of employees. In favour of employees S a o O Feb. 23;. Mar. 3.. April 19.. May 2. . May 22.. June 12. . Aug. 1.. Aug. 14 . . Aug. 17.. Aug. 28., Sept. 1.. April 24.. Mar. 24. April 13. June 8 Jnlv 14. Julv 17. July 20. Oct. 3. Nov. 13. Nov. IB. Dec. 1.5 Deo. 20. Mar. 15.. Apr. 17.. July 6.. Aug. 29.. Nov. 16.. Nov. 16. Nov. 16.. o Mar 31. Mar. 10. May 19. May 11. May 30. Aug. 23. Aug. 18. Aug. 23. Sept. 1. Sept. 9. April 28. Apr. 8. Apr. 25. July 12. Aug. 7. ■luly 20. July 27. Oct. 11. Dec. 4. Nov. 22. Deo. 21. Apr. 12. May 10. July 17. Sept. 6. |g O w .a a S2 s a a, I 3 C8 55 30 150 120 39 100 100 300 325 260 240 200 27 44 1 2,883 375 11 41 21 370 14 70 25 250 55 125 177 1,176 1 1 6 5 4 1 1 19 105 130 70 350 208 106 172 1,201 62 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA 4. DETAILS OF INDUSTEIAL DISPUTES 1916 Occupation, General Trwnsport — ' Freight handlers (C.N.Rly.).. Machinists, boilermakers, black- smiths and carmen. Machinists Freight handlers, (G.T.Rly.). . Conductors and brakemen Freight handlers, (G.T.Rly.). . Freight handlers, (G.T.Rly.).. Freight handlers, (C.P.Rly.).. Freight handlers, (C.P.Rly.).. Linemen and groundmen . . Teamsters Grain shovellers Teamsters Teamsters . . Teamsters Dairy drivers Dairy drivers Drivers (Can. Express Co. ) Teamsters Miscellaneous — Restaurant employees . Journeymen barbers . Unskilled Labour Labourers ... Labourers Labourers Locality. Port Arthur, Ont Hamilton, Ont Transoona, Man Stratford, Ont Sault Ste-Marie, Ont.. Niagara Falls, Ont . . London, Ont London, Ont Toronto, Ont Vancouver, B.C Toronto, Ont Port Arthur and Fort William, Ont. Montreal, Que Hamilton, Ont Winnipeg, Man Vancouver, B.C Winnipeg, Man Toronto, Ont. .... ... Saskatoon, Sask Edmonton, Alta. Montreal, Que . . . Welland Canal (Thorold, Ont.) Hamilton, Ont Hamilton, Ont Cause or Object. Increased wages Increased wages Objection to improvers doing machinists' work Increased wages Increased wages , Increased wages Increased wages Increased wages Increased wages Increased wages and recognition of union Increased wages Increased wages Increased wages Jncreased wages Increased wages \. Alleged unjust conditions of employment. Recognition of union Increased wages Reduction ot wages , Increase in wages and an eight-hour day Earlier closing of shops and minimum weekly wage. Increased wages. , Increased wages. Increased wages. STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 IN THE PEEIOD 1911-1916— Concluded. 1916 63 Method of Settlement. Places of strikers filled Unsettled Deo. 31, 1916. Negotiations Negotiations Negotiations Places of strikers filled Negotiations , Negotiations. . . . , Negotiations Mediation Mediation Negotiations Negotiations Negotiations Negotiations Places of strikers filled Negotiations Drivers returned to work un- conditionally. Negotiations Negotiations . Negotiations . Labourers unconditionally re- turned to work. I Negotiations ' liabourers unconditionally re- turned to work. Kesult. In favour of employers. In favour of employees In favour of employees In favour of employees In favour of employers Compromise Cf^m promise Compromise In favour of employees . . Compromise In favour of employers Compromise Compromise Compromise In favour of employers Compromise In favour of employers In favour of employees Employees partially suc- cessful. ^ In favour of employees . . . In favour of employers . In favour of employees . . In favour of employers . . Grand total. S i May 2. May 20. June 1 . July 1. Aug. 29. Oct. 2. Nov. 1. Nov. 4. Nov. 16. Aug. 24. Feb. 11. Apr. 28. May 8. May 10. May 5. Nov. 11. Nov. 13. Nov. 28 May 16.. Sept. 11.. May 1. July 7. . July 10.. c3 June 8.. July 8.. Sept. 2.. Oct. 25.. Nov. 10.. Nov. 9.. Nov. 21.. Sept. 19. Feb. 25. May 5. May 12. May 12. June 24. May 12. Nov. 14. Nov. 16. Dec. 2. July 14. Sept. 16. May 8. Aug. 2. July 31. « s O o £ a o a a ■S-d t- s So Bv 33 100 125 171 20 41 22 27 15 197 55 353 200 500 14 200 60 150 50 40 2,340 4 100 104 53 300 353 600 55 150 805 211 21,157 5. TABLES OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES 1911-1915. * I. By ProTinces. II. By Industries. III. By Numbers of Employees Inyolved. lY. By Time Loss. V. By Industries and Duration. VI. By Causes and Eesults. VII. By Method of Settlement. 28163—5 66 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table 1. — ^Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915, by Provinces. Year. Disputes. No. of firms involved. No. of employees affected. Time loss. Province. Number. Per- centage of total in each year. Working days. Per- centage of total in each year. Nova Scotia 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 •1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 2 4 4 4 8 22 20 20 3-5 •10 18-6 4-9 2 24 56 18 14 114 1,154 104 1,015 ■ 188 ,3,821 193,230 1,790 18,324 10,683 24,025 9-5 01 1-4,' 2-4 22-6 6,282 248,052 4-9 Prince Edward Island. . . . i". ■" 6-8' i 18 36 1 3 7 8 2 1 36 0-2 1 18 New Brunswiick 3 4 6 70 4-5 2 3 7 17 33 2 2 134 872 2,362 930 100 406 13,274 154, 136 2,780 600 - 11-9 0-2 Oo 21 19 24 18 9 5 4-7 19 1 160 15-9 20-4 11-6 61 3, 698 171, 196 3-4 Quebec 57 109 63 ?3 9 6,745 6,810 9,293 4,534 2,738 42,270 181,926 ^5, 751 167, 277 15,362 20 16 5 6-6 38-8 14-4 75 ' 16-7 ,41-4 44-6 45 1 45-4 37-2 261 30, 12t 492,586 9-9 41 67 51 20 16 137 406 519 79 34 4,503 10,970 14,093 1,269 1,123 77,243 270, 589 219,608 72,183 34, Til 3-8 24-6 170 16-7 ,32 7 195 43-4 ■1,175 31,958 674, .334 I3t Manitoba a 7 5 2 4 80 4-6 4-4 4-5 9-3 14 113 118 66 14 369 3,005 1,138 193 107 1,165 28,450 23,501 4,219 830 00 2-5 1-8 0-9 0-7 26 5-8 325 4,812 58,165 11 Saskatchewan 16 4 1 10-6 3 5 2-2 149 36 4 1,885 188 12 11,116 3,569 70 10 0-2 00 21 4'7 189 2,085 14,755 0-2 STRIKES AND T.OCKOOTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 67 Table I. — Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915, by Provinces — Concluded. Year. Disputes. / No. of firms involved. No. of employees affected. Time loss. Province. Number. Per- centage of total in each year. Working days. Per- centage of total in each year. Alberta 1911 1912 1913 lbl4 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 12 14 6 4 4 121 90 5-3 9 9-3 45 127 107 9 14 1,668 3,345 1,369 1,077 355 8,545 76,837 13,051 17,167 4,108 0-4 6 9 10 3-9 , 3-8 40 8-9 302 7,814 119,708 2-4 12 10 15 2 5 121 6 6 13-2 4-5 11-6 196 43 81 . 4 9 8,221 12,520 9,560 1,175 896 312,791 490,726 756,202 155,675 26,513 154 44-6 58-7 361 24-9 > 44 9-8 333 32,372 1,741,907 1,411,000 24, 500 13,500 350^ Interprovincial 2 1 1 20 0-6 0-8 17 1 1 7,300 1,000 500 69-8 2-2 10 I 0-9 19 8,800 1,449,000 28-9 <}rand total 449 100 2,780 127,959 4,969,739 100 28163—54 68 DEPARTMENT 01' LABOUR^ CANADA Table II.— Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915, by Industries. Years. Disputes. No. of firms involved. No. of em- afiected. Time loss. IndujBtry or Occupation. No. Per- centage of Total in each year. Working days. Per- centage of total in each year. Fishing 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1H3 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 150" 2,600 '" 5,' 466' 49,600 1 2 ■6 1-7 ■ 3 34 4 3-8 3 ■7 37 2,750 55, 000 11 Lumbering 4 3 .2-6 2;6 17 18 825 2,000 4,270 137,300 ■3 10-6 '■ " 141, 570 7 1-6 70 4 6 1 6-8 1-3 35 2,825 2 E Mining I 7 3 6 22 30 35 5 11 9,769 5,074 5,081 1,975 4,332 1,592,800 89,168 702, 726 16^9,200 . 16,794 ' 78-9 8-2 54-5 39-3 15-8 29 6-5 103 26,231 2,570,688 51-7 Building Trades 29 52 31 12 4 29-2 34-6 27-4 27 2 9 3 218 585 661 140 21 8,828 8,465 " 7,312 1,745 157 286,804 114,224 105,510 34,056 16, 600 14-2 10-3 81 7-9 15-6 128 28-5 1,655 26,507 557,194 11-2 Metal Trades . . . 18 29 29 14 13 181 . 19-3 25 6 31-8 30-2 50 110 109 14 15 3,167 2,687 4,084 983 2,842 32,6.S3 32,525 79,479 51,573 40,812 1-6 2-9 61 11-9 38-4 1 103 22-9 298 13,763 237,022 4-7 Woodworking Trades 2 20 2 60 657 •0 3 1 2-6 2 2 47 1 550 80 30,020 800 2-3 •1 6 13 50 690 31,377 ' -6 Printing and Allied Trades - 3 20 32 308 3,702 ■3 1 2-3 10 21 903 ■8 4 4 1 3 •9 42 329 4,605 ■0 Textiles 4 6 26 4 1 3 943 1U6 1,379 18,123 1,166 7,351 ■8 •1 ■5 1 2-3 1 50 450 ■4 » 9 20 9 2,478 27,090 •5 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 69 Table II. — ^Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915, by Industries — Concluded. Years. 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1311-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 • 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 19)2 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911-15 , Disputes. No. of firms involved. No. of em- ployees affected. Time loss. Industiy or Occupation. No. 13 19 10 5 4 51 3 2 5 2 3 Per- centage of total in each year. Working . days. Per- centage of total in each year. Clothing 131 10-2 88 11-3 9-3 13 63 66 19 1,285 6,738 9,726 3,525 180 11,770 306,107 107,052 ISO, 270 2,540 •5 27-8 8-3 37-2 2 3 11-4 3 1-3 4-4 4-5 6-9 156 21,454 587,739 11-8 Food, Liquors and Tobacco. 18 8 16 2 11 213 72 750 53 88 373 2,382 14,420 10,120 4,427 •0 ■2 11 2 3 4-1 15 1 3-3 10 55 1,176 31,722 300 •6 Leather 1 15 ■0 . 2 4-5 3 65 2,270 •6 3 ■7 4 80 2,570 •0 G-eneral Transport. . . ... 12 14 4 121 9-3 70 2-2 9-3 105 20 11 1 8 4,987 4,359 1,917 150 1,140 85,493 82,998 23,988 300 W,360 4-2 7-5 1-8 18-2 39 8-7 145 12,553 212,139 4-2 Miscellaneous 6 10 5 4 7 32 60 6-6 4 4 90 16 2 6 100 18 20 14 402 589 596 102 330 11,467 8,028 9,850 1,465 4,263 ■5 ■7 ■7 3 40 71 158 2,019 35,073 ■7 Unskilled Labour 4 9 7 40 60 6-1. 6 20 7 425 11,138 3,541 6,330 449,238 20,382 •3 40-8 1-5 20 4-5 33 15,104 475,950, 9-5 Grand Total 449 100 2,780 127,959 4,969,739 100 70 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUBj CANADA Table III. — ^Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915, 1911. Numbers of Eraployeea Involved. Disputes. at ■si 1-^ No. of employees affected. Time loss. 1 ll Working days. II i's 5, 000 and upwards 2,500 to 5,000 1,000 to 2,500 2 *4 5 10 22 21 14 14 7 20 70 12,500 1,631,000 79-7 40 51 10-2 22-2 21-2 14- 1 141 71 23 63 158 62 /30 33 19 17 5,700 3,700 2,918 3,118 1,427 491 240 232, 700 34,350 68,977 41,949 30, 440 5,854 1,380 11-4 500 to 1, 000 1-7 250 to 500 100 to 250 : 3-4 20 50 to 100 25 to 50 1-5 ■3 Under 25 . . Not reported Total 99 100 475 30,094 2,04f,650 100 5, 000 and upward 2,500 to 5, 000 1,000 to 2,500 500 to 1,000 250 to 500 100 to 250 50 to 100 25 to 50 Under 25 Not reported Total. 1914. 1 2 1 1 9 9 14 7 44 100 15 3 1 1 117 22 35 11 205 3,000 2,000 900 350 1,221 642 464 101 8,678 117,000 165,75(1 15,300 26,950 53, 456 20,583 26,067 4,948 430,054 27-2 38-5 3-6 6-3 12-4 4-8 61 1-1 1000 STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 by Numbers of Employees Involved. 71 1 1912. 1913. Disputes. No. of einploye- es affect- ed. rime loss. Disputes. Time loss. 1 a 3 CO §-§ •si d.S Working days. 1 ti ■sg 6.3 No. of employees affected. Working days. b s"s ^2; Ok ^ ^ ;?5 (^ ;z; h 1 •7 12 6,000 360,000 32-8 3 20 14 10,000 260,000 23 7 3 2-6 268 10,500 613,620 47-6 6 • 40 92 8,012 117,600 10-7 6 ■5-3 73 10,250 231,800 180 5 3 3 32 3,132 155,750 It 2 11 9-7 184 6,'607 200,986 15-6 15 100 133 4,504 69,233 6-2 23 20-3 189 7,335 134,804 10-5 34 22-7 354 ■ 5,379 65,882 6-0 18 160 143 2,720 45,540 3-5 30 1 20 146 2,U46 .''5,471 3-2 18 160 82 1,276 37,526 2-9 35 23-3 118 1,182 29,764 2-7 16 141 52 604 20,001 1-6 19 12-7 30 256 5,508 •5 18 160 24 244 3,501 •3 2 1-3 1000 8 989 40,511 150 1,099,208 100 113 100-0 1,015 39,536 1,287,678 1000 1915. Total. 3 •fi 82 18,500 26,000 1,991,000 998,020 401 1 2-3 5 - 3,500 7,500 ■7 8 1 3 302 20 1 2 4-6 3 3,125 13,625 12-8 20 3 9 194 29,087 761,475 15-3 1 2-3 1 600 15,000 141 23 5 281 14,939 421,386 8-5 2 4-6 2 600 2,650 2-4 61 9 6 533 15,707 302,614 61 10 23-3 16 1,420 13,454 12-6 93 18 3 692 13,858 220,281 4-4 8 18-7 23 470 18,957 17-8 86 16 9 303 5,861 142,977 2-8 ~7 16-3 22 251 25,863 23-8 86 20 5 260 2,992 107,019 2-2 12 27-9 24 174 9,600 90 70 21 5 108 1,015 24,937 ■5 9 2-4 25 43 1000 96 9,140 106, 149 100 449 100 1 2,780 127,959 4,969,739 1000 72 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUKj CANADA Table IV. — Industrial Disputes, 1911. Numbers of Working Days Lost. Disputes. Number of employees involved. Time loss. Number. Percentage of total. Number of firms involved. Working days. Percentage of total. 100,000 and upward ..... So, 000 and under 100,000. 25,000 and under 50,000. 15, 000 and under 25, 000. 10,000 and under 15,000. 5, 000 and under 10, 000. 2, 500 and under 5,000. 1,000 and under 2,500. 500 and under 1,000. 250 and under 500. 100 and under ^ 250. Under 100 3 3-1 71 13,500 il, 821, 000 88-9 2 1 3 9 7 10 13 13 13 15 10 2-0 1-0 31 9-1 7-1 10-1 13-1 13-1 13-1 15-1 10-1 51 1 51 45 91 47 12 25 42 19 20 1,700 300 966 6,274 1,260 1,783 1,615 1,210 911 390 155 55,000 21,000 31,756 61,940 21,980 16,741 10,032 4,462 1,975 764 2-7 10 ■ l.fi 3-0 1-1 ' ■% •2 .1 •0 Total 99 100 475 30,094 2,046,650 100 1914. 100, 000 and upward 50,000 and under 100,000. 26,000 and under iSO.OOO. 15,000 and under 25,000. 10,000 and under 15,000. 5,000 and under 10,000. 2, 500 and under 5, 000. 1,000 ond under 2,500. 500 and under 1,000. 250 and under 500. 100 an t under 250- Under 100 Indefinite . . . 2 i '" 1 2 2 3 8 5 3 4 8 5 4-6 2;3' 2-3 4-5 4-5 6-8 18-2 11-4 6-8 9-1 18-2 11-4 18 i' 1 1 41 81 14 12 3 4 24 5 4,000 356" 900 1,100 235 216 565 399 193 248 215 263 270,750 '" 26,950 15,300 24,840 16,615 10,985 12,673 4,046 1,098 669 405 45,723 62-9 6^3" 3-6 5-8 3-9 2-6 - 2-9 •9 •3 • 1 •1 10-6 Total ■ 44 100 205 8,678 430,054 100 i ^Includes Springhill strike, entailing a loss of 190,000 days in 1911. This strike began August 11, 1909, and terminated May 29, 1911, entailing a total loss of 759,100 days. STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 73 1911-1915, by Time Loss. _ 1912. i - 1913. Disputes. . to s ^i Time loss. Disputes. CD si Time loss. « cp > y ll 11 "S-S Working ■ f 3 h b ■ T> ■s.s si Working h ^B^^ daya. §£ s as S 0.0 days. s£ £■" a^u te ° 3 s o s c. S s ° •^ h 1^, '^ Ph z ?^ ^ f5 (S 3 2-0 25 11,382 623,500 56-7 2 1-8 15 5,050 722,850 56-1 1 •6 1 3,000 81,000 7-4 3 2-6 35 1,600 151,400 11-8 4 2-7 48 4,550 154,750 14-1 1 ■9 1 500 13,500 1-0 3 2-0 64 4,212 63,000 5-7 7 6-2 400 6,9.^6 128,835 10-0 3 12 2-6 10-6 39 123 2,480 4,058 36,120 78,599 2-8 5 3-3 124 1,000 34,180 . 3-1 6-1 16 10-7 200 5,175 55,678 5-1 11 9-7 95 4,680 39, 162 30 ''34 22-7 179 5,169 58,099 5-3 30 26-5 184 6,412 47,538 3-7 24 16-0 137 2,624 17,461 1-6 14 12-4 6e 1,988 10,336 •8 22 14-7 108 1,707 7,946 •7 6 5.3 11 2!)7 2,027 •2 IB 10-7 56 ?93 2,714 •2 15 13-3 23 417 2,230 •2 16 10-7 32 544 880 •08 7 6-2 7 118 411 •0 6 4-0 15 989 355 40, 5n 2 1-8 17 5,000 54,670 4-3 150 100 1,099,208 100 113 100 1,015 39,536 1,278,678 100 1915. Total. 10 2-2 129 33,932 3,438,100 232,400 250,200 69-2 4 •8 36 4,600 4-7 8 1-8 101 7,100 5-0 1 2-3 1 600 15,000 14-1 13 2-9 467 12,948 243,135 4-9 1 2-3 1 57 10,208 9-6 9 2-0 92 4,603 102,924 2-1 5 11-6 10 5,740 34,905 32-9 33 7-3 343 17,. W 226,239 4-5 2 4-6 2 153 5,747 5-4 39 8-7 469 11,478 133,552 2-7 11 26-6 26 1,496 16,h23 15-7. 93 20-7 450 15,425 151,674 20 7 16-3 24 451 5,195 4-9 63 14-0 251 7,107 47,070 •9 7 16-3 15 346 2,434 2-3 51 11-3 162 3,753 17,967 •4 \ 9-3 4 101 602 •5 52 11-6 128 2,470 8,190 •2 2 4-6 5 28 126 •1 48 10-7 87 1,295 2,586 ■1 3 7-0 8 168 15,309 14-4 26 5-8 65 5,941 127,959 115,702 2-3 43 100 96 9,140 106,149 100 449 100 2,780 4,967,739 100 ^Including one strike begun the previous year. 74 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table V. — Industrial Disputes, l&ll- 5 Days ob Less.- 6-10 DATS. 11-16 Days. Industry or Occupation. 1 •3 ■ d ll ■3| i —3 S| 1 ■3 i ll ■sg I O S! z M 1 1 ll II Fishing 1911 1912 ■ 1913 1 26 2,000 4,000 1915 1 25 2,000 4,000 Lumbering '. 1911 1913 1913 1914 1 1 8 7 500 250 2,500 1,260 1 1 1 33 200 198 J, 200 1 8 92 1,372 1911-15 2 15 750 3,750 2 1 233 1,398 1 8 92 1,372 Mining 1911 1912 1 3 1 1 S 1 I 1 10 550 1,199 400 75 4,218 2,200 4,418 1,000 150 15,654 2 2 1,030 7,370 1 1 175 2,460 r 1913 1 1 100 900 1914 1 1 114 1,140 1911-15 11 16 6,442 23,422 4 4 1,244 9,410 1 1 175 2,450 8 13 5 4 1 16 104 43 5 4 310 1,552 692 125 14 700 4,676 1,926 276 56 5 8 8 I 42 122 257 6 661 3,265 3,235 117 4,240 29,692 20,120 819 2 2 59 19 894 148 12,328 1912 1,784 1914 1915 2 2 1,070 12,910 1911-15 31 172 2,593 7,534 22 427 7,168 54,871 6 80 2,112 27,022 Metal Trades 1911 1912 4 14 5 4 4 4 50 17 4 5 615 1,718 1,313 169 2,405 1,930 6,904 3,339 346 9,925 4 4 9 3 20 19 14 3 1|516 306 59^ 262 11,906 2,480 4,836 2,072 3 13 -540 5,748 1913 1914 1915 2 1 17 1 400 176 5,650 1,925 1911-15 31 80 6,220 21,444 20 66 2,676 21,293 6 31 1,116 13,223 1 1 42 263 1912 1914 1 1 80 800 1915 1911-15 2 2 . 122 1,063 Printing and Allied Trades 1911 1912 1 9 28 262 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1 9 28 262 Textiles 1911 1912 1 1 120 360 1 1 109 873 1 1 1 1 600 106 7,200 1,166 2 2 568 2,426 1 1 1 1 821 60 4,926 460 1914 1915 1911-15 3 3 678 2,785 3 3 980 6,249 2 2 706 8,366 ' STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 75 1915, by Industries and Duration. / p 16-20 Days. 21-30 Days. OvEH 30 Days. Indefinite. Total. 1 DO ■■3 d d.S i i 1 d 2 It o| d.S Z i .1 If 1^ i ■3 d ,■31 1-^ 1 i. 11 O OS z 1 1 ■s d Z to > Z Is •s| d d Z .9'S i| 1 1 ll •sg d.S z .J If 1 3 150 5,400 1 2 3 34 150 2,600 6,400 1 ' 9 600 45,600 49 600 — 1 1 9 600 . 45,600 3 160 6,400 3 37 2,760 66,000 ^ t 1 200 200 4 3 17 18 826 2,000 4,270 1 11 1,550 134,850 137,300 — 1 1 2 2 1 11 1,550 134,850 200 200 7 35 2,825 141,570 1 / 1 154 3,230 2 17 8,000 1,580,000 1 26 6 35 3,700 3,544 7 6 7 3 6 22 30 35 5 11 9,769 6,074 6,081 1,975 4,332 1,592,800 89, 163 ' 82,300 593,990 1 1 37 1,036 2 1 26 3 1,000 1,000 105,800 153,750 702,726 169,200 1 1 900 15,300 16,794 2 5 5 6 7 4 2 24 5 1 . 1 900 15,300 2 191 4,266 46 10,000 1,839,550 33 7,279 676,290 29 103 26,231 2/570,688 1 76 192 140 126 12 6,506 1,893 778 395 115 261,786 31,533 26,644 19,025 8,115 8 17 3 55 111 10 557 1,149 299 7,750 36,240 20,181 29 52 31 12 4 248 585 661 140 21 8,828 8,465 7,312 1,745 157 286,804 114,224 105,510 34,056 16,600 4 4 28 72 263 1,217 4,864 9,265 2 4 1 9 139 1 205 1,191 38 ■ 5,535 27,374 1,026 1 29 4 8 1 4 2 19 5 28 8,429 7 3 1 2 9 100 1,480 14,129 149 1,434 33,935 546 9,687 347,103 181 2,033 72,600 128 1,656 26,507 557,194 7 21 3 250 120 96 6,550 3,360 2,310 6 11 2 4 3 247 422 25 245 140 6,500 8,641 2,040 42,618 6,880 18 29 29 14 13 60 110 109 14 15 3,167 2,687 4,084 983 2,842 3!2,633 32,625 79,479 51,573 2 8 2 6 18 9 54 2 6 122 1,471 132 171 12,140 58,444 4,612 21,613 2 2 185 2,960 1 1 126 2,394 40,812 6 3 3 311 5,354 31 466 12,220 71 1,896 96,809 26 1,079 66,679 103 298 13,763 237,022 1 1 18 304 2 2 60 557 1 3 70 1,500 2 44 480 28,520 3 1 47 1 560 80 30,020 800 ' 1 1 18 304 1 3 70 1,600 2 44 480 28,520 6 50 690 31,377 2 23 280 3,450 3 32 308 3,702 1 1 1 10 21 903 1 10 21 2 10 21 903 23 280 3,450 4 42 329 4,605 1 114 9,690 4 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 943 106 1,379 60 18,123 1 166 7,351 — 1 — 1 114 9,690 9 9 2,478 27,090 — — — — 76 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table V. — ^Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915, 5 Days oh Lebs. 6-10 Days. 11-15 Days. Industry or Occupation. 1 o d i o a d 11 II 1 •s d II '•s| 6. J If H Clothing 1911 1912 1913 1914 5 6 2 6 15 2 490 382 65 920 1,162 275 4 1 2 4 2 34 648 44 2,276 5,420 352 13,676 - 1 1 i 2,000 30 23,800 330 1915 2 3 128 824 1911-15 13 22 927 2,347 9 43 3,095 20,271 2 1 2,030 24,130 Food, Liquor and Tobacco 1911 912 2 1 3 1 213 12 373 12 1915 1 9 55 276 ■ ' 4 13 280 660 Leather 1911 1912 1913 1915 1911 15 6 7 5 1 1 47 8 8 1 1 2,689 2,280 932 160 200 8,025 7,070 4,378 300 600 2 1 1 52 1 1 330 260 400 27,160 1,600 4,000 1913 1914 1915 1911 1911-16 1 5 200 1,800 1 1 140 1,960 20 65 6,251 20,373 5 69 1,180 34,460 1 1 140 1,960 4 2 4 2 300 94 947 122 1912 1913 2 1 1 2 4 8 4 9 201 10 12 130 1,866 120 70 980 1 1 3 70 514 910 7,660 1914 1 2 13 2 62 35 62 175 1911-15 9 21 481 1,296 6 25 363 3,036 2 3 584 8,570 Unskilled Labour 1911 3 2 4 3 3 4 176 1,250 1,391 330 4,250 3,482 1912 2 2 2 2 448 1,900 3,038 11,400 1913 1914 1915 1911 15 9 10 2,816 8,062 4 4 2,348 14,438 Grand Total 1911 34 49 26 11 14 84 194 109 24 ^ 31 6,462 8,987 7,491 671 6,927 16,786 30,004 22,075 1,124 26,685 19 20 26 7 6 122 160 318 *15 18 4,236 4,564 9,635 621 672 67,221 39,378 61,177 4,211 4,744 6 6 4 4 1 73 29 20 4 1 2,034 591 2,914 1,275 140 26,276 1912 1913 1914 1916 7,682 37,010 15,165 1,960 1911-16 134 442 29,438 96,673 78 633 19,427 166,731 21 127 6,954 87,093 STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 77 by Industries and Duration. — Concluded. 16-20 DAYS. 21-30 DAYS. Over 30 days. Indefinite. Total. 1 •s i •S.I 1- J II 1 •3 6 Z z 1 1* |i i 1 •3 1 1 2 2 4 1 1^ IB 1> ■3| 1- 1- 1 .a -d "3 6 3 6 2 (d ^ V ■sj O 01 Z §.1 1 i (A d.a z ■S| ii S 3 1 13 3 18 1 80 4,626 221 3,495 12 2,560 144,900 11,482 159,940 996 3 29 17 67 1,606 6,000 2,870 155,648 64,670 13 19 10 5 4 13 63 56 19 5 1,285 6,738 9,726 3,525 180 11,770 1 1 1 60 175 1,080 3,150 3 3 122 2,975 306, 107 107,052 160,270 1 1 • 40 720 2,, MO 3 IT 1 1 1 1 . 3 2 276 4,950 '3 122 2,975 10 36 8,333 319,878 49 6,672 213,188 61 156 21,454 587,739 15 7 1 1 3 2 5 2 3 18 8 16 2 11 213 72 750 53 88 373 60 110 .18 2,370 1,000 3,105 2,382 1 1 160 3,000 2 2 340 7,920 1 1 2 12 •1 2 150 35 33 2,600 7,015 4,152 14,420 10,120 4,427 2 4 1 1 1 ISO 3,000 2 340 7,920 4 15 218 13,667 24 188 6,475 16 55 1,176 31,722 1 15 300 1 1 15 300 2 3 65 2,270 2 3 65 2,270 — 2 1 3 5 3 65 2,270 1 15 300 3 4 80 2,570 — 1 1,400 28,000 - 5 10 668 1,529 22,308 30,428 12 14 8 1 4 105 20 11 1 8 4,987 4,359 1,917 150 1,140 85,493 t 1 1 300 44,000 82,998- ■^ 2 2 585 15,610 23,988 300 1 3 1 600 15,000 19,360 8 2 5 I 1 1 1,400 28,000 3 1,185 30,610 1 1 300 44,000 15 2,097 62,736 39 145 12,553 212,139 1 2 94 1 102 224 10 10,620 5,130 100 6 10 6 4 7 6 100 18 20 14 402 589 596 102 330 11,467 8,028 2 2 6 3 62 38 1,970 1,343 9,850 1,465 ^ 3 165 3,i68 4,263 — 8 1 3 165 3,108 4 1 1 9 100 3,313 97 336 15,750 32 168 2,019 35,073 3 12 250 6,000 6,000 360,000 4 9 7 .6 20 7 425 11,138 3,541 6,330 1 1 1 1 3,000 250 81,000 5,500 3 2 440 950 449,238 - 20,382 2 4 7 13 1 1 26 2 10 12 26 16 12 3 23 51 10 5 3 92 2 3,250 86,500 16 6,250 366,000 2 440 950 20 33 16,104 475,950 i 5 8 1 5 9 3) 147 1 4 1,418 , 323 1,727 900 331 28,304 5,944 18,375 15,300 6,222 8 34 151 1 1 404 3,447 2,569 38 600 1,841,786 127,648 428,888 177,387 44,728 98 227 305 156 31 14,950 12,840 6,312 5,160 352 1,860,036 592,573 415,810 347,955 35,779 88 316 37 5 8 1,591 9,759 8,988 263 168 50,248 330,757 671,981 45,723 15,309 99 150 113 46 42 475 989 1,015 206 95 30,094 40,611 39,536 8,728 9,090 2,046,650 1,099,208 1,287,678 430,504 105,699 22 192 4,699 74,145 195 7,058 2,620,437 76 817 39,614 3,252,153 464 20,769 1,114,018 449 2,780 127,959 4,969,739 78 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA . Table VI, — ^Industrial Disputes, i 1 Year. In favour of employees. In favour of employers. Principal cause or object. . . S .1 ■s EC o > to 1. r. >, as 1-2 s ^ i •s d 09 7' 1. 1^ 1 For increase in wages 1911 1312 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 19U-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 19J5 1911-15 1911 1912 1913. 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 12 28 17 4 5 151 325 420 ' 24 .14 2,594 5,781 9,840 93 3,264 26,931 53,579 80,747 6,708 11,770 18 17 21 3 2 27 102 87 3 2 3,241 8,630 5, 090 263 300 40,79.'> 373,329 178, 914 4, 129 1,000 66 934 21,572 179,735 61 221 17,524 250 215 4,460 500 361 5,786 73 140 762 75 13 1,063 598,167 Against reduction in wages 2 1 1 2 2 3 1 IC 5 10 1,430 90 115 34 655 28,160 8,460 2,850 92 15, 275 3 2 5 4 6 3 2 53 4 9 4,430 3,800- 43,300 34,631 14,391 8 35 la 13 8 2,324 54, 837 20 71 100,552 1 3 1 296 10 1 3 3 1 1 1 3 9 1 1 292 V 7,023 120 1,088 10,326 150 3,087 5 36 306 7,143 9 15 14,943 For increased wages and ' "i2 5 "39,'5i8 16,239 shorter hours. 85 29 3,473 1,084 5 2 1 36 5 234 645 1,000 4,432 1,965 12,000 17 114 4,557 55,757 8 41 1,879 18,397 For recognition of union . . . 2 1 13 13 ' 190 52 2,700 52 , 5 1 8 3 657 1,000 94,006 153,750 1,657 3 26 2 1 242 196 100 2,752 6 11 247,756 s Against employmentof non- unionists. 2 1 1,047 300 1 2 1 3 68 87 408 2,910 1 1 1 1 90 40 180 720 3 3 296 1,347 5 6 8 31 1 40 285 135 340 400 200 4,218 For increase in wages and 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 3 6 1 1 2,240 12,948 2,400 9,600 other changes. 5 1 40 1 521 200 6,833 1,400 6 41 721 8,233 11 80 1,075 27,188 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 79 1911-1915, by 'Causes and Results. Compromiae. Indefinite. Total. i '■5 "S 1 o > S f. Mm *■ o 1 "o' d Z e 1^ 1. il 1 T3 "3 i s i ■h 7,235 17,704 18, 792 483 3,832 1 CO Mm 1^ 11 ,10 15 2 60 26 ,214 8 3 1,348 1,076 3, 485 127 185 20, 574 5, 713 108,135 834 1,695 4 11 3 2 14 52 2,217 377 40 42,310 11, 121 45 66 56 9 12 240 558 735 35 22 88,340 474,931 378,917 11,671 20,574 3 2 3 83 6,109 41 311 6,221 136, 951 20 124 1 26 4 4 7 2,729 59, 580 188 1,590 48,046 874,433 1 2 2 4 3 35 1,225 l,lli( 235 fiO 6 5 8 12 13 7 29 73 15 29 1,715 1,530 5,685 929 1, 186 32,590 60,460 94,300 65,741 41,053 48,200 48, 150 29,698 10,477 2 2 2 3 160 110 1,320 910 4 5 270 2,230 12 42 2,665 1.36, 525 44 153 11,045 294,144 1 1 1 4 65 200 178 130 400 3,210 O 7 7 1 1 17 17 21 1 1 138 636 950 75 13 422 1 8,511 13,656 3 \ 1. 3,087 5 6 443 3,740 19 57 1,812 295 8,449 2,419 1,000 25,826 2 2 3 26 21 59 245 125 690 245 1,570 36,500 1 1 14 50 4,617 10, 000 147,925 3 22 10 1 27 156 93 10,245 193,445 54 704 12 000 15 4,667 . 7 106 1 31 1,060 1,000 160 38,315 4 157,925 36 276 12,163 270,394 1 190, 000 1,380 1 3 ,8 2 1 31 25 16 1,000 2b0 4,347 1,052 190,000 1,780 634,706 153,802 2 1 1 4 100 3,500 400 588,000 4 6,659 404 187 4,000 3,090 40 3 32 1,160 191,380 2 4 3,600 140 588,400 14 73 1,030,288 1 1 1 1 840 5 3 1 2 1 5 4 14 16 1 ' 2,295 3,210 7,520 117,180 720 1 14 15 4,000 7,520 1 15 3,000 117,000 3,000 7,240 300 400 140 2 Ifi 117,000 2 4,140 300 3,028 ""i8 100 8,360 12 40 7,721 130,925 3 1 , 2 1 19 1 17 65 1,391,040 44,000 5,550 4,060 1 2 i 1 1 10 i 1 21,000 81,252 3405 900 7 14 4 3 1 28 82 19 106 1 7,675 4,189 1,000 358 100 1,414,280 145,033 9,350 16,765 900 8,080 7 102 1,444,650 5 13 3,446 106,257 29 23R 13,322 1,586,328 80 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUK^ CANADA Table VI. — Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915, Years. / In favour of employees. 1 In favour of employers. Principal cause or object. \ 1 .1 "o d 1. .3 60 If Eh 1 .!■ -a O is l-t CO ■■s-s =-= 1 a, i'- CD ■a .S to J| r ^ Against discbarge of em- ployees! 1911 19 L2 1913 1914 1915 1 3 1 3 8 233 80 540 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 100 1,047 165 185 200 121,650 1,325 1,490 * 1911-15 4 4 241 620 8 8 1,497 124,665 Sympathetic disputes 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1911-15 3 1 3 1 238 64 2,476 1 1 3,328 ^ 1 i 55 ' ' ' 140 550 1^960 2,510 2 2 6 i85 41655 2 2 195 6 487 9,859 Against employment of . particular persons. 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1 2 24 33 281 53 2,478 1 5 1 44 20 670 80 4,2a7 1 1 1 1 1 30 80 180 1 1 1,125 5,625 6,640 1911-15 4 26 1,439 8,'156 6.S5 62 4,566 17,f565 11,021 8 47 800 11,127 Unclassified 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 4 2 5 4 6 4 2 6 5 26 344 27 652 1,021 2,148 4,192 7 . 3 7 2 3 56 3 21 2 10 899 690 831 110 231 43,140 3,696 17,H14 2,810 10,094 , 1911-15 21 43 33,849 22 92 2,761 77,554 Grand total 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 23 57 33 11 15 177 494 494 47 52 4,605 10,802 12,146 1,200 7,332 56,906 118,793 109,172 24,417 45,651 354,939 38 46 47 17 16 101 227 18? 57 26 5,024 12,117 13,010 3,453 1,210 94,061 531,408 850,050 218,920 39,987 1911-15 139 1,264 36,085 164 698 34,814 1,234,426 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 by Causes and Eesults. — Concluded. 81 OompromiBe. Indefinite., Total. 1 "q ■s 1, Wo .! P s 1 a 03 a ■s 1 .s GO 1^ 1 1 5 "S i s e P. •a 1 ■is 35,500 10,600 2 6 4 2 2 6 5 2 108 3,780 365 185 280 1 1 i 2 2,500 200 157,690 11,925 1,490 2,700 ' ■ ■ 2 3 46,100 14 15 4,438 171,385 1 i iso 3,000 1 1 54 1 5,500 40 241,000 4 2 2 57 2 2 5,738 104 205 243,476 3,328 3,550 ■ V 3 3 325 6,015 1 1 150 3,000 2 55 1 1 5,540 88 40 241,000 11 64 6,372 256,369 2 2 400 2,350 1 1 5 8 ] 2 2 5 69 1 2 2 561 991 2911 70 1,205 3,117 2,483 6,905 6,670 260 12,265 200 1 1 1 290 40 6,670 80 1 2 128 ,932 1,609 4 4 730 9,100 2 200 IS 79 28,583 2 2 21 11 3,050 355 12,950 1,415 5 7 5 19 5,514 38,742 18 14 12 10 10 86 35 27 12 37 5,225 2,681 1,483 1,436 2,439 62,239 43,915 22,380 50,995 21,535 4 5 305 30.620 1 1 60 420 5 33 3,465 ' 13,348 2,216 5,193 3,467 355 14,785 16 29 2,846 74,876 64 197 13,264 30,094 40,511 39,536 8,678 9, HO 201,064 23 18 25 7 6 131 91 296 91 7 1,617,289 54,478 163,065 123,294 3,025 15 29 8 9 6 66 177 38 10 11 7,097 15,376 9,187 568 243 278,394 394,529 665,391 63,423 17,486 99 150 113 44 43 475 989 1,015 205 96 2,046,650 1,099,208 1,287,678 430,054 106,149 79 616 24,579 1,961,151 67 302 32,461 1,419,223 449 2,780 127,959 ' 4,969,739 28163—6 82 DEPARTMENT OF LABOtJBj CANADA I'able VII. — Industrial Disputes, Year. Negotiations between the parties. Conciliation or _ 'M 1 1/" Mediation. Industry or Occupation. i .2 Q d 125 1 i. DO > S "S 1 i'' Fishing , 1911 1912 1913 1914 1 600 1915 1911-15 1911 ..',... 1 600 Lumbering 1912 1913 1914 1 2 500 450 ■ 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 3 2 2 1 1 3 950 Mining 7,950 1,010 37 900 1,439 1 1,000 ""2 1914 1915 i'sis' , 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 9 11,336 3 3,543 Building Trades 16 28 19 8 1 72 8,205 6,524 6,756 462 35 2 3 114 286 1 53 1911-15 1911. 1912 1913 1914 1915..... 21,980 6 452 Metal Trades 8 15 17 4 2 905 1,290 2,905 425 65 2 1 4 365 10 661 1911-15 1911 46 5,590 7 1,036 Woodworking Trades 2 2 60 480 1912 1913 1914 1 80 1915 1911-15 1911 "1 4 540 1 80 Printing and Allied Trades 1912 2 278 1913 ' * * ■ / 1914 1915 1911-15... . 1 21 3 299 STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 83 1911-1915, by Methods of Settlement. Arbitration. Reference to Board under I.D.I. Act. Returned to ^^ork on Eraployers' terms. Replacement of workpeople. Otherwise (in- cluding indefinite or unsettled). Total. ! s ■■■ "S i P 1 a m s O i o' "3. S-d MS 1 s i No. of Emplpj'ees affected. 1 "S "H. 1 No. of Employees affected. 1 S d No. of Employees affected. "'i' " "2,666 1 150 1 2 150 *• • • 2,600 1 2,000 1 150 3 2,750 ' i 1 92 1,550 1 33 1 200 4 3 825 2,000 2 1,642 1 33 1 200 7 2,825 1 550 - 1 80 1 154 1 4 2 35 4,064 3,544 7 6 7 3 6 9,769 5,074 4 2 1,500 1,075 5,081 1,975 1 350 4,332 1 550 2 430 7 2,72H 7 7,643 29 26,231 1 1 85 65 3 10 7 1 2 80 558 267 200 94 2 2 3 119 319 240 5 8 2 1 1 225 714 49 30 28 29 52 31 12 4 8,828 8,465 " l' i,666 7,312 1,745 157 2 150 1 1,000 23 1,199 7 678 17 1,046 128 26,507 6 2 6 6 7' 1,810 666 473 313 ' 621 2 5 87 269 ■■■5' 2 4 3 467 45 245 156 18 29 29 14 13 3,167 1 45 2,687 4,084 "2,666' 983 1 2,842 2 2,045 ,27 3,883 7 356 14 853 103 13,763 ' 2 60 1 70 ..■'... 3 1 550 80 1 70 6 690 1 30 3 308 " ■V- ■ 1 21 1 30 ,4 329 28163— 6i 84 DEPAKTilENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table VII.— Industrial Disputes, 1911-1915, year. V Negotiations between the parties. Conciliation or Mediation. ' Industry or Occupation. i .S a 6 1 i a ■1 1 i 1 S-6 °| Textiles 1911 : 1912 1 1 120 106 / 1913 459 1914 1915 1911-15 1911 1912 1 50 3 6 4 6 1 2 276 459' Clothing .... 7.30 252 4,671 3,000 128 4,702' 1913 1914 1916 1911-15 1911 19 2 8,781 4,702 Food, Liquors and Tobacco 160 1912 12 1913 1914 2 440 1915 , 1911-15 1911 1 55 5 655 12 Leather 1912 1913 1914 , 30 1915 19lf-15 1911 1912 1913 ; 1914 . . .... 30 General Transport 5 4 2 590 850 600 2 2 3 3,500 36Q 718 1915 1911-15.... 1911 :. 2 13 ■ 800 2,840 7 4,578 Miscellaneous 1 2 3 4 5 17 84 578 102 120 1912 1!)1.S 1914 1915 1911-15 '911 15 901 Unskilled Labour 1912 2 1 1,250 500 1913 19U 1915 ,. 1911-15 1911 1912 1913 1914 . 1915 ' 3 43 61 56 18 18 1,750 Grand Total . 18,737 12,144 18,017 4,889 2,713 7 11 8 3 2 4,979 5,369 1,838 163 2,543 1 1911-15.... 196 66,500 31 14,892 , STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, '1901-1916 85 by methods of Settlement — Concluded. Arbitration. Reference to Board under I.D.I. Act. Returned to work on Employers' Terms. Replacement of workpeople . Otherwise (in- cluding indefinite or imsettled). Total. 1 a s ■ "S 6 1 =1 t 4 i .1 1 1 I 1^ 1 1 ■s d 5a i 0. fSS 1 a EO s d 00 a 1 "S 1 . ii 1^ 2 714 1 109 4 1 3 "1 943 106 ' 2 920 1,379 50 ^ 4 1,631 1 109 9 2,478 4 3 1 2 . 1 468 964 15 380 12 2 4 ""i 55 171 40 1 4 3 2 32 649 5,040 145 13 19 10 5 4 1,285 6,738 9,726 .. . 3,525 180 n 1,839 7 266 10 5,876 51 21,454 "l 1 '"2 1 53 3 2 5 2 3 213 60 50 33 72 i 2 1 260 18 750 35 53 88 4 143 1 35 4 331 15 1,176 1 15 1 ""2 15 35' 1 65 1 35 1 15 3 80 2 3 2 1 1 500 1,790 585 150 200 2 1 1 97 19 14 1 i 300 1,340 140 12 14 8 1 4 4,987 4,359 1,917 160 1,140 9 3,225 4 130 6 1,780 39 12,553 3 2 185 195 1 2 2 "■'2' 150 95 18 2i6 1 50 215 6 10 5 4 7 402 X 589 596 102 _ 330 5 380 7 463 5 265 32 2,019 ' 1 4 4 135 e,488 2,750 2 "2 260 29i' 1 3 30 3,400 4 9 7 425 11,138 3,541 9 9,. 373 4 551 4 3,430 20 16,104 635 65 700 2 1 1 1 '"i 2 80 45 '" i,'666 2,350_ 22 26 30 13 13 4,046 10,813 10,180 2,153 960 12 16 8 1 3 >783 936 563 35 250 12 34 11 8 5 . 834 11,139 8,938 438 324 99 150 li3 44 43 30,0!I4 40,511 39,536 8,678 9,140 3 5 3,475 104 28,152 40 2,567 70 21,673 449 127,959 6. TABLE OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES, 1901-1915. VIII. By Provinces. IX. By Industries. X. By Numbers of Employees Involved. XI. By Time Loss. XII. By Industries and Duration. XIII. By Causes and Results. 87 88 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table VIII.— Industrial Disputes, 1901-1915, by Provinpes. Disputes. No. of Establish mentis No. of Em- Time Loss. Province. Year. Per- Per- centage Con- ployees Working Days. centage No. of Total cerned. Aflfected. ofTrtal in each in each 5' Year. Year. Nova Scotia 1901 " 4-8 34 2,624 '28,215 4-4 1902 9 7 ■4 88 1,769 12,962 100 1903 6 4 1 39 2,6x5 10,770 •8 • 1904 9 9 •0 9 4,339 71,194 26-8 19U5 7 7 ■8 6 5,815 . 33,562 151 1906 11 ^ •8 9 4,815 31,560 8-6 1907 10 6 ■7 19 6,134 140,725 22-5 1908 3 4 •4 9 377 2,806 ■2 1909 6 8 •7 9 5,930 522,(162 59-9 191U 4 4 •7 17 1,903 361,615 50-2 ilHll-15 1901-15 22 4-8 111 6,282 248,052 4-9 92 2 61 "l-6 3,')3 42,673 1,463,523 13 7 Prince Edward Island . 1901 1902 2 47 819 ■6 - 1903 1901 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 p 1910 J-1911-15 1901-15 1901 i ' 3 3 ■2 ■2 .. .s . 2-9 1 , 18 36 3 65 855 ■0 New Brunswick ... 6 124 639 1 1902 7 5 7 6 382 5,993 41 ■ 1903 3 2 3 901 16,741 1-3 1904 2 2 5 11 1905 5 5 6 10 1,925 22,620 101 1906 9 6 4 49 823 6,948 1-6 1907 8 5 4 15 ,1,480 13,462 20 1908 6 8 8 19 1,485 29,935 40 1909 2 2 8 2 65 2,515 ■1 1910 1 ,1 2 1 150 1.050 ■1 ^1911-15 21 4-6 61 3,698 171,196 3-4 1901 15 1901 67 28 4-4 t 26 9 177 11,044 271,099 25 Quebec 36 5,749 29,818 4-5 1902 20 16- 5 102 3,338 19,655 15-8 1903 31 21 2 236 15,744 235,076 191 1904 31 31- 3 311 3,555 53,183 200 1905 21 23- 6 157 2,130 44,543 20-2 1906 24 17- 86 5,218 58,498 161 1907 30 20- 102 7,579 76,326 12-2 1908 21 30- 8 62 9,982 166,869 23-4 1909 13 18' 8 39 2,295 61,883 58- 1910 18 21- 4 530 7,237 105,504 146 11911-15 75 16-7 261 30,120 492,586 9-9 190115 312 20 5 1,912 92,947 1,333,941 12-5 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 89 Table VIII. — Industrial Disputes, 1901-1915, by Provinces. — Continued. - Disputes. Time Lost. Year. No. of Establish- ments Concerned No. of Em- ployees Affected. Province. No. Per- centage of Total Working Days. Per- centage of Total in e^ch in each Year. Year. Ontario 1901 54 520 188 3,923 50,646 8-2 1902 66 54-5 180 5,714 68,934 56 6 1903 79 541 470 14,028 439,290 35 7 1904 46 46 4 225 6,092 129,676 4 8 1905 31 34-8 134 2,113 • 26,711 11 9 1906 63 44-6 450 7,011 54,566 15 1907 73 48 9 444 12,319 236,799 3« U 1908 27 39-7 74 2,572 67,206 9 4 1909 26 37-6 116 3,239 38,099 4 3 1910 34 404 550 5,794 116,536 16 1 11911-15 195 43-4 1,175 31.958 674,334 13-5 1901-15 694 45-7 4,006 94,763 1,902,797 17-8 Manitoba 1901 3 2-8 2 472 17,744 2-6 " 1902 8 6-6 22 400 2,375 16 6 1903 2 1-3 90 900 8,200 6 5 1904 4 40 5 58 ' 489 1 1905 11 12-3 V 61 563 5,532 2 3 1906 9 6 3 344 5,035 36,796 10 1907 6 40 95 1,367 29,300 4 6 1908 1 1-4 1 16 48 1909 6 8-6 80 1,549 28,079 3 2 1910 7 8-3 33 1,061 14,472 1 9 -H911 15 2B 6-7 325 4,812 58,165 1 1 « 19U1-15 83 5-5 1,058 16,233 201,200 1-9 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1 il 1 20 1906 1907 1 •6 5 40 360 ■05 1908 1 1-4 2 200 800 1 1909 1 1-4 1 162 486 ■05 1910 1 4-7 43 297 10,622 1 3 il911-15 1901-15 21 46 1.9 189 2,085 14,755 •2 26 241 2,804 27,023 •3 Alberta 1901 1902 1 •8 13 90 1,030 8 1903 4 2-7 30 18,S 3,990 2 1901 1 10 3 28 112 04 « 1905 2 2-2 2 400 13,000 5 9 1906 12 8-5 48 1,491 127,709 35 3 1907 6 40 22 678 2,556 3 1908 3 4-4 3 669 8,599 1 1 1909 6 8-6 125 873 48,416 5 5 1910 6 7 1 91 730 13,882 1 ■8 +1911-15 ' 1901-15 40 8-9 302 7, 81 4 119,708 24 81 5-3 639 12,856 339,052 3 •2 90 ' DEPARTMENT OP LABOUR, CANADA Table VIII.— Industrial Disputes, 1901-1915> by Provinces- -Ooncluded. Disputes. Time Loss. No. of Year. Establish- ments No. of Em- Province. Per- Per- ,No. 10 centage of Total in each Year. Con- , cerned. ployees Affected. Working Days. centage of Total in each Year. British Columbia 1901 9-6 6 10,194 190,249 300 1902 8 6-6 7 524 9,122 7-5 1903 21 14-3 59 15,600 512,433 41-7 1904 4 40 15 1,199 5,150 1-8 1905 10 '11-2 64 3,157 71.276 32-7 1906 13 9-2 29 1,657 43,720 U 9 1907 13 8-: 115 3,102 69,584 9-5 1908 5 7-3 14 2,092 8,022 1-1 1909 8 11-6 14 719 18,605 2-0 1910 7 8-3 67 1,008 21,454 2-9 -11911-15 1901-15 44 9-7 333 32,372 1,741,907 350 143 9-4 723 71,624 2,681,522 250 Interprovincial 1901 1902 1903 1904 1 •9 1 5,000 315,000 49-8 ■'"a" ■'2-6" 2 1,200 ' 5,200 1-9 1905 ■190H 1907 1 11 2 100 2 1-3 8 3,525 62,850 9-9 1908 1 1-4 1 8,000 424,000 59-8 1909 1 1-4 11 2,500 ' 161,700 18-4 lalO 3 3-5 3 3,100 73,500 101 il911-15 1901-15 4 •8 19 8,800 1,449,000 28-9 15 10 47 32,225 2,491,250 23-3 Grand Total 1,519 100 9,159 377,234 . 10,712,262 1000 i For individual years see page 6. STBHiES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 91 Table IX. — Industrial Disputes, 1901-1915, by Industries. Years. Disputes. No. Establish- mentsi concerned No. Em- ployees Time Loss. Industry or Occupation. Per- centage Per- centage No. of Total in each Affected. Working Days. of Total in each Year. Year. Fishincr 1901 2 19 8,000 30 4,100 1,170 136,000 21 5 1902 1H03 1 1 •8 ■6 49,200 4,400 3'9 1904 2 2 13 1-5 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 , 1 1 •7 •6 180 125 540 1000 ■2 •2 2 2 8 5 372 6,948 ■6 1910 ' 1911-15 1901 15 1901 3 ■6 37 2,750 55,000 253,088 11 13 4 9 55 16,727 2-4 Lumbering 3-8 4 925 3,200 •4 1902 3 2-4 3 300 2,790 1-6 1903 4 2-7 3 1,200 2,500. •2 1904 2 20 3 215 1,000 ■4 1905 1906 5 3 5 10 1,290 30,490 8 3 1907 2 1-3 5 453 6,081 •9 1908 4 5-8 3 , 428 14,066 •2 1909 2 2-9 2 300 6,600 ■6 1910 2 2-3 2 450 4,350 •5 11911-15 1901-15 1901 7 1-5 35 2,825 141,570 2-8 35 •2 3 70 8,386 212,647 20 Mining 5 4-8 7 3,685 56,650 8-8 1902 3 2-4 3 510 9,720 7-5 1903 9 61 10 11,931 440,455 35-8 1904 7 7 9 3,161 24,866 90 1905 13 14 6 14 8,445 115,481 52-9 1906 14 9-9 14 6,495 187,780 520 1907 13 8-7 53 13,250 203,949 32-6 1908 9 13-2 13 3,119 30,271 4-2 1909 10 14-4 20 8,795 711,207 81-6 1910 4 4-7 6 2,338 377,100 52-5 11911-15 1901-15 1901 29 116 6-4 103 26,231 2,570,68,S 51-7 7-6 13-4 252 87,960 4,728,167 44-1 Building Trades 14 108 2,.533 02,793 9-8 1902 31 25-6 258 3,557 30,827 250 1903 44 301 653 8,783 357,563 291 1904 30 303 461 6,041 124,693 46-7 1S05 24 •26 -9 248 1,766 34,710 15-6 1906 29 20-5 716 8,454 69,472 19-2 1907 44 29'5 494 5,278 18.5,063 29-7 1908 12 17-6 94 1,561 20,957 2-8 1909 13 18-8 288 2,.580 47,100 5-4 1910 25 29 7 1,143 9,446 151,436 210 J-l 911-15 1901-15 1901 128 28-5 1,655 26,507 557,194 11-2 394 20 25-9 6,118 • 76,506 1,641,808 15-3 Metal Trades 19-2 52 1,239 11,710 1-7 1902 28. 231 33 1,963 20,488 166 1903 16 10 9 41 2,688 74,517 60 1904 17 181 26 3,181 82,796 30 1905 14 15-7 36 1,509 19,442 8-7 1906 23 16-3 147 2,515 20,821 5 5 1907 23 15-4 115 2,282 92,113 14-8- 1908 9 13 2 15 960 51,887 7-2 1909 6 7-2 17 499 2.3,883 2-6 1910 15 17-8 75 2,081 30,257 4 1 11911-15 1901-15 103 22-9 180 298 13,763 237,022 4-7 273 855 32,680 664,936 6-2 92 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table IX. — Industrial Disputes, 1901-1915 — Continued. Disputes. Time Loss. Industry or Occupation. Years. No. p„, JVo. of No. of Pfintl™ Establish- Em- ofTotoi„™«"*^ pi°y«^« in e^h Concerned Afifected. ' Working Days. Per- centaji^e of Total in each 1901 6 Year. Year. Woodworking Trades 57 21 1,141 606 17,346 14,825 2-6 11-6 1902 7 5-7 25 1903 l.f. 10-2 30 1,014 18,069 1-4 1 1904 3 30 1 3 142 1,831 3 1905 2 2 2 3 152 8,742 3-6 1906 6 4-2 20 915 5,401 1-3 1907 3 21 7 235 6,401- ■9 1908 1 1-4 1 17 1,326 2 1909 2 2 9 9 36 744 ■08 1910 2 2-3 2 100 600 08 41911-15 1901-15 1901 6 1-3 50 690 31,377 ■6 53 2 3-5 171 5,048 106,662 ■99 Printing and Allied Trades 1-9 2 24 108 ■01 1902 3 2-4 3 29 15 02 1903 3 20 23 .S24 1,231 •01 1904 1905 4 6 40 6-7 12 44 277 446 8,236 36 1906 6 4-2 18 197 3,358 ■8 1907 2 1-3 9 39 201 03 1908 1 1-4 1 40 360 •05 1909 1910 " "i 1-2 3 40 200 02 *1911-16 1901-15 1901 1902 1903 4 32 •8 42 329 4,605 •0 21 157 1,745 18,314 17 Textiles 5 I 5 4-8 •8 3-4 5 1 4 2,8.S6 6 1,346 23,232 36 17,671 13 1904 3 30 3 134 1,044 •3 1905 1 11 1 1.S4 804 "3 1906 5 3 5 6 2,234 15,124 4 1 1907 6 40 6 3,.S97 31,357 4-9 ^ 1S08 6 8-8 8 7,542 135,972 19.0 1909 2 28 2. 948 33,380 3-7 1910 *1911-15 1901-15 1901 2 9- 2 3 20 2 9 315 2,478 20,950 27,090 2-7 •5 43 30 47 21,370 306,624 2-9 Clothing , 10 9-6 32 615 2,203 •3 1902 8 6-6 24 163 392 •3 1903 11 7-5 e3 6,754 173,560 14 1 1904 11 111 21 291 1,964 3 1905 1906 11 9 12 3 6-4 60 15 1,145 560 18,678 2,465 8-2 •5 1907 17 11-4 29 2,278 33,055 5^3 1908 8 11-6 12 950 17,058 2-4 1909 11 15-9 14 736 12,538 13 ) 1910 1911-15 11 51 ISO 11-3 36 156 1,552 21,454 40,415 587,739 . 5^5 ,U8 1901-15 1901 1.58 10 10-4 9 6 462 36,498 890,067 8-4 Food, Liquors and Tobacco. . . 19 746 986 01 * 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 191J.-15 1901-15 10 6 11 4 8 2 1 2 8 15 77 ■ 8-2 41 11 1 4-4 5-6 1-3 1-4 2-8 9-5 33 51 20 ' 28 14 13 20 1 1 5 46 55 310 280 666 151 2i7 47 83 75 698 1,176 3,066 2,609 8,434 , 1,106 1,784 1,128 1,328 3,895 7,626 31,722 2-5 •1 3 ■4 •2 •2 •] ■3 - •9 ■6 222 4,489 63,684 .59 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 Table IX. — Industrial Disputes, 1901-1915 — Concluded. 93 Disputes. Time Lost. Years. No. of Estaiilish- inents No. of Em- ployees Affected. Industry or Occupation. Per- Per- No. centage of Total Concerned Working Days. centage of Total in each in each Year. Year. Leather 1901 1 ■9 1 36 72 •01 1902 3 2-4 3 85 188 01 1903 4 2-7 8 178 3,084 02 1904 1 10 2 25 252 09 1905 1906 3 2 1 3. 79 2,108 5 1907 ^908 1909 5 3-3 20 316 3,431 4 2 2-8 7 si 5,231 5 1910 1 12 4 72 2,664 2 *1911-15 1901 15 1901 3 23 •6 4 80 2,570 •0 1-5 52 952 19,600 •18 General Transport 11 10-6 9 6,466 315,804 498 1902 10 8-2 17 3,135 10,120 8 3 1903 15 10 2 46 8,851 69,341 5 6 1904 2 20 2 103 9,540 3 3 1905 5 5-6 9 1,415 6.973 2 7 1906 16 11-3 17 2,178 16,697 4 4 1907 17 11-4 54 5,637 40,212 6 4 1908 7 10-2 16 8,482 425,572 60 1909 ' 7 101 17 1,505 • 10,000 1 1 1910 7 8-0 8 3,820 80,915 11 1 *1911-15 1901-15 1901 1902 39 8-6 145 . 12,553 212,139 4-2 136 8-9 340 53,145 1,197,313 11 2 3 6 2-8 4 9 3 23 105 1,098 720 26,801 > 1 21 6 1903 4 2-7 10 297 1,870 08 1904 2 20 2 796 3,664 1 1 1905 7 7-8 7 1,000 2,992 9 1906 5 3-5 19 95 626 1 1907 7 4 6 25 834 12,421 1 9 1908 2 2 9 2 416 5,648 6 1909 2 2-8 2 112 5,520 5 1910 1 1-2 1 20 40 01 ■ *1911-15 1901-15 1901 32 71 158 2,019 35,073 •7 71 4-7 252 6,792 95,381 •89' Unskilled labour 11 10-5 10 735 1,481 •2 1902 7 5-7 7 472 1,708 8 1903 9 61 8 2,295 14,830 1 1 1904 4 4 4 280 520 1 1905 2 2-2 2 60 80 03 1906 11 7-8 10 601 3,131 8 1907 7 4-6 7^ 2,0.53 5,550 8 1908 8 11-6 9 1,695 3,840 4 1909 9 130 9 1,293 4,799 4 1910 5 5-9 7 348 2,082 2 *1911-15 1901-15 20 93 4-4 61 33 15,104 475,950 9-5 106 24,936 513,971. 4-8 Grand Total 1,519 9,159 377,234 10,712,262 ' For individual years see page 6. 34 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table X.— Industrial Disputes, 1901-1915, 1 1901. Numbers of Employees Involved. Number of Disputes. Number of Estab- lishments Con- cerned. Number of Employees Affected. Time Loss in Working Days. 5, 000 and upward . , 2 1 3 5 6 9 16 23 31 8 1 1 5 21 65 50 36 58 .32 4 13,000 2,525 3,560 3,280 2,031 1,464 1,040 783 403 451,000 2,500 to 5,000 1,000 to 2,500 . 20,200 55,740 -^ 500 to 1,000 250 to 500 100 to 250 .50 to 100 25 to 50 33,760 44,074 8,930 6,059 11,849 Under 25 , ' 1,699 Not reported Total 104 273 28,086 I 632,311 1904. 5, 000 and upward .... - 2,500 to 5,000 1,000 to 2,500 5 3 8 15 12 22 30 4 79 66 232 56 17 81 41 3 7,240 1,990 2,940 2,355 886 699 372 111,520 500 to 1, 000 n,aoo 250 to 500 100 to 250 50 to 100 52,775 36,701 16,370 25 to 50 Under 25 3,016 3,022 99 575 16,482 265,004 1907. 2 10 8 11 27 25 30 32 4 37 71 264 43 200 71 77 60 2 6,450 13,532 5,224 3,774 4,016 i,650 1,047 471 . 74,100 1,000 to 2,500 193,176 174,344 250 to 500 -. . 50 to 100 Under 25 32,255 87,462 36,586 18,785 5,254 Not reported Total ' 149 825 36,224 - 621,962 1910. 2,500 to 6,000 2 3 6 9 14 15 16 15 4 203 451 198 207 80 118 56 19 3 6,200 4,300 3,830 2,894 2,266 992 518 280 61,100 1,000 to 2,500 500 to 1,000 407,000 45,830 250 to 500 100 to 250 50 to 100 Under25 .......'. '. 94,834 69,663 21,145 15,741 3,332 Total 84 1,335 21,280 718,635 » Includes Springhill strike, involving 1,700 employees, not settled at end of 1910. called off until April, 1910. ' For individual years see page 70. ' Includes Glace STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 95 by Numbers of Employees Involved. 1902. 1903. Number of Disputes. Number i.f Estab- lishments Con- cerned. Number of Employees Affected. Time Loss in_ Working Days. Number of Disputes. Number of Estab- lishments Con- cerned. Number of EuQployees Affected. Time Loss in Working Days. 2 3 5 11 17 27 18 29 32 2 1 101 13 351 103 133 92 67 66 12,463 10,440 7,415 7,607 5,077 4,367 1,280 987 405 465,983 250,220 1 3 11 19 21 29 36 1 1 25 83 142 50 52 66 1 1,000 2,000 3,410 2,946 1,440 1,009 459 2,000 10,400 40,500 45,087 12,020 6,076 4,851 29,550 224,247 121,355 88,798 17,253 26,579 2,515 121 420 12,264 120,940 146 927 .50,041 1,226,500 1905. 1906. 1 5 ' 6 10 24 25 36 30 4 200 205 14 105 257 104 83 46 1 4,000 7,225 4,094 3,204 4,003 1,788 1,264 472 28,000 .4 4 5 20 17 18 21 4 108' 4 118 146 37 20 6,794 2,698 1,840 2,820 1,122 603 346 20,698 111,346 17,550 36,300 20,872 8,335 2,143 47,875 162,164 48,732 31,410 23,624 13,985 4,007 89 437 16,223 217,244 141 1,015 26,050 359,797 1908. 1909. •2 3 14,000 551,950 2 2 4 9 17. 8 15 I'J 12 52 4 207 48 14 39 21 25,000 12,900 2,870 2,803 2,547 532 531 149 445,400 2 3 9 13 13 8 17 1 3 32 38 18 38 8 34 1 2,325 2,220 3,139 2,126 915 281 287 9,375 12,200 64,057 42,359 22,623 2,297 3,424 221,225 48,512 73,440 56,499 15,747 8,427 2,595 68 175 25,293 708,285 69 397 17,332 871,845 '1911-1915. Total 1901-1915. 3 8 20 23 51 93 86 86 70 9 82 302 194 281 533 692 303 260 1C8 25 18,500 26,000 29,087 14,939 15,707 13,858 5,861 ' 2,992 1,015 1,991,000 998,020 761,475 421,386 302,614 220,281 142,977 107,049. 24,937 9 19 60 76 146 278 256 312 326 37 87 856 1,078 1,364 1,620 1,794 989 818 513 40 57,963 60,615 85,438 50,752 46,819 42,768 17,506 10,714 4,659 3,459,933 1,877,040 1,889,634 1,255,789 892,186 723,480 334,282 222,139 57,779 449 2,780 127,959 4,969,739- 1,519 9,159 377,234 10,712,262 Bay strike, involving 2,500 employees ; industry not affected after close of year, but strike not formally 96 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table XI. — Industrial Disputes,' 1901. Disputes. Ill Iz; t ll (5 . Time Loss. Numbers of Working Days Lost. 1 a s iz; 1 , •s 1 451,000 50,000 100,000 and upwards 2 1 1-9 10 1 13,000 1,000 71-3 ■50,000 to 100, 000 25 000 to 50 000 7-9 15,000 to 25,000 3 1 1 5 8 10 9 15 22 27 104 2-9 1-0 1-0 4-8 7-7 9-6 8-7 .14-4 21-1 25-9 100 6 50 12 14 48 26 1 16 21 47 32 273 3,625 370 350 2,609 3,140 678 80] 984 483 1,046 61,600 14,430 9,800 18,032 14,419 6,815 3,218 2,192 805 9-7 10,000 to 15,000 5,000 to 10,000 2-3 1-5 2,500 to 5,000 1,000 to 2,500 2-9 2-3 500 to 1,000 250 to 500 lOtf to 250 11 •5 •3 Under 100 •1 Total 28,086 632,311 100 > 1904. 100,000 and upwards , .. ^ 50,000 to 100, 000 25,000 to 50,000. . . 2 20 65 3,900 128,400 48-5 15,000 to 25,000 10,000 to 15,000. 3 7 7 1 4 16 12 2L 20 "" 3-6' 7-1 71 71 40 16-2 121 21-2 20-2 ""l88 98 62 17 4 26 23 48 44 "1,340 2,580 3,785 935 265 1,246 505 333 1,593 ' 37,' 950 52,225 24,370 10,031 3,44S 5,865 1,873 842 ■ ■■i^:3' 5,000 to 10,000 19-7 1,000 to 2,500 9-2 3-8 1-3 250 to 500 , Under 100 2-2 •7 •3 266,004 '99 100 575 16,482 100 ' 1907. 10p,000 and upwards 50,000 to 100, 000 25,000 to 50,000 3 2 2 7 12 16 17 16 23 24 14 13 149 21 1-3 1-3 4-7 81 10-7 11-4 10-7 15-4 lC-1 9-4 8-7 100 112 140 41 86 73 42 90 59 108 39 18 17 825 5,200 1,650 3,300 8,454 4,523 5,525 2,631 1,649 1,988 837 313 154 240,850 65,000 41,800 81,950 84,501 58,450 25,224 11,510 7,769 4,049 859 38-7 10-5 6-7 10,000 to 15,000 13-2 5,000 to 10,000 13-6 2,500 to 5,000 500 to 1,000, 250 to '500. 100 to 250 Indefinite 9-4 41 . 1-8 1-2 •7 •1 36,224 621,962 100 'Includes Springhill strike, entailing a loss of 209,100 days not settled at end of 1909. STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1&16 1901-1915, by Time Loss. 97 1902. 1903. Diuputea. e3 d ■'i|' Time Loss. Dispates. ■i: 3 ft Time Loss. »*-( »*-i J 11 •sf ill aJ5 o ll it 1 bo 1 f. 13 1 5 o III 1 ■n En; a o f. ll 'A Oh a ^ a« IZi PM 'A iz; ^ P4 3 21 101 ie,6Q3 700 663,803 70,700 172,126 104,331 54-1 1 ■ 7 1 5-8 4 2-7 71 5,725 14-0 i •8 1 300 16,800 ,13-9 6 4-1 60 3,276 8-5 6 4-1 182 1,47(1 72,725 5-9 3 2-5 63 775 19,500 161 9 6-2 147 4,239 62,762 6-1 12 9-9 118 3,198 46,711 38-6 11 7-5 54 6,688 36,449 30 15 12-4 71 3,035 23,675 19-6 20 13-7 114 4,737 ,31,115 2-5 12 9-9 .SO 1,530 8,176 6-8 8 6-E 28 714 5,991 •5 8 6-6 8 780 2,725 1-3 11 7-5 11 996 3,788 -3 13 10-7 34 529 2,067 1-7 13 8-9 47 756 2,124 •2 25 20-7 40 537 1,286 11 17 11-6 28 302 597 ■1 32 26-4 55 1,580 37 25-3 83 4,834 121 100 420 12,264 120,940 lob 146 100 927 60,041 1,226,500 100 1905. 1906. 1 ■8 1 500 - 114,500 31-8 1 1-1 1-1 i 102 600 500 65,000 27,125 29-9 12-5 1 2 1-4 201 4,900 67,600 18-7 1 •8 1 1,500 16,500 35,350 4-6 2 2-2 3 2,613 26,483 12-2 3 2-1 202 2,550 9-8 6 6-7 8 1,991 47,539 21-9 5 3-5 32 4,387 32,156 9-0 6 6-7 38 3,718 20,210 9-3 10 7'1 65 2,750 39,397 10-9 9 10-1 93 2,351 16,988 7-4 19 13-5 119 3,729 32,579 91 12 13-5 13 1,805 9,048 4-2 16 11-3 134 1,420 10,829 30 8 9-0 41 788 2,927 1-3 18 12-8 58 1-445 6,775 1-9 14 15-7 54 729 2,187 10 17 12 1 122 762 2,817 -8 15 16-9 18 306 737 •3 , 25 17-7 39 656 1,295 -4 15 16-9 66 922 24 17-0 41 1,451 89 100 437 16,223 217,244 100 141 100 1,015 26-050 359.797 100 1908. 1909. 2 2-9 3 14,000 551,^50 77-9 3 4-4 13 6,700 »664,500 76-1 1 1-5 1 458 36,724 50 2 2-9 2 1,208 68,500 6-7 1 2 1-4 2.9 101 55 400 1,370 21,200 24,825 2-4 3 4-4 6 375 40,125 . 5-7 2-9 6 8-8 65 3,091 37,433 5-3 9 • 130 28 2,373 69,282 6-8 3 4-4 3 2,385 12,675 1-8 6 S-7 86 1,547 23,629 2-7 12 17-7 22 2,393 18,475 2-6 12 17-4 46 1,983 19,721 2-8 8 11-7 15 1,157 5,576 •8 10 14-5 17 1,058 6,114 -7 11 16-2 27 827 4,427 ■6 6 8-7 .SO 213 2,217 -3 8 11-7 10 331 1,321 ■2 10 14-5 11 311 1,534 • 1 13 19- 1 22 276 579 •1 8 11-6 8 169 323 -04 ■ 1 1-5 1 175 25,293 68 100 708,285 100 69 100 397 17,332 871,845 100 28163—7 98 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CAN.4DA Table XI. — Indmstrial Disputes, -; 1910. Disputes. Number of Estab- lishments c n - !_. cerned. II H •a i,;roo Time Loss. Numbers of Working Days Lost. a 1 Percentage of ^ total. P Working days. fl Oh 100,000 and upwards 1 501 50,000 to 100, 000 25,000 to 50,000 15,000 to 25,000. . . ' 5 3 2 9 8 9 11 12 13 6 5. 84 60 3-6 2-4 10-7 9-5 10-7 13.1 14-3 15-5 7-1 6-0 100 427 353 2 90 268 49 23 78 34 6 4 5,660 5,020 381 2,587 1,788 1,065 1,825 618 600 113 23 151,550 55,780 28,650 66,316 26,791 14,634 8,036 4,402 2,308 168 21-1 7-8 10,000 to 15,000 5,000 to 10,000 2,500 to 5,000. 1,000 to 2,500 4-0 9-2 3-7 2-0 500 to 1,000 1-1 250 to 500 ■6 100 to 2S0. 3 Under loo •02 1,335 21,280 718,635 100 'Springhill strike not settled at end of 1910. STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1&16 99 1901-1915, by Time Loss — Concluded. 1911-1915. s Total 1901-1915. Disputes. i« Time Loss. Disputes. P to ta 9 A'i Time Loss. "o 1" "S "3 1 ■s SI a s Ir umber o lishment cemed. 1 3, 438, 100 t. 1 1 11 umber oi lishme fected. it 1 11 f^ pii ^ 33, 932 69-2 iz; 22 1-4 249 85,435 ^ CM 10 2-2 129 6,233,853 58-2 4 •9 36 4,600 232, 400 4-7 12 •8 215 16,000 787,350 7-4 s 1-8 101 7,100 250, 200 5-0 25 1-6 1,045 27,201 827,824 7-7 13 2-9 467 12,948 243, 135 4-9 30 20 1,030 30,369 561, 146 5-2 9 2-0 92 4,603 102,924 21 38 -2-5 866 23,426 465,412 4-3 33 7-3 343 17,307 226,239 4-6 100 61 959 44,203 697,752 6-5 39 8-7 469 11,478 133,552 2-7 123 8-1 1,213 45, 472 440,260 41 93 20-7 450 15,42.) 151,674 30 221 14-5 1,119 41,424 357,533 3-3 63 14-0 251 7,107 47, 070 ■9 170 11-2 600 19, 208 122,613 1-1 51 11-4 162 3,753 17, 967 •3 173 n-4 565 13, 355 62,078 •6 52 11-H 128 2,470 8,190 ■2 191 12-6 523 8,814 30,662 •3 48 10-7 87 1,295 2,586 •1 214 13-5 361 4,783 10,077 •1 26 5-8 65 5,941 115,702 2-3 200 1,519 13-2 100 408 17,544 115,702 1-1 449 100 2,780 127,959 4,967,759 100 9,159 377,234 10,712,262 100 'For individual years see page 72. 38163— 7i 100 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table XII. — Industrial Disputes, 1901, Year. 6 Days or Less. 6 TO 10 Days. 1 11 TO 15 Days. 16 TO Industry or Occupation. 1 P ■s d ^ 15 . i Jl .1.1 •s d If 1 Jl 1 ■s i fi i .3 . II J ■3 1 ll of Hf«H«8*( fcttUHb 1901 1902 1903 1904 1906 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-16 1 1 4,100 49,200 .... 1 12 1,100 4,400 1 25 2,000 4,000 1901-15 2 37 3,100 8,400 1 4,100 49,200 1 1901 1902 1903 1904 1906 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-15 , 2 2 800 3,200 1 1 230 2,070 a 3 1,200 2,500 1 2 200 1,000 1 1 3 1 2 3 20 228 353 40 456 1,241 1 .... 1 220 1,100 1 6 ^ 1 2 1 1 160 233 1,060 1,398 1 1 1 8 300 92 3,300 1,372 2 16 760 3,750 1901-16 12 26 3,361 11,187 6 6 1,033 1 6,618 2 9 392 4,672 1 6 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 . '1911-15 3 6 2,625 6,870 1 1 1 1 60 160 780 1,920 1 2 1 2 160 934 1,200 7,552 f 2 3 5 4 3 4 1 1 11 2 3 6 4 3 4 1 1 16 2,016 1,655 5,233 2,330 1,767 2,345 75 24 6,442 3,350 4,590 8,727 7,490 6,626 9,176 375 24 23,422 1 1 16 176 2 1 4 1 t 2 1 1 4 4 2 1 1,772 1,016 3,664 97 140 12,404 6,306 21,984 561 1,120 2 3 1 3 3 1,715 53 19,220 689 1 1 1 1 *4 4 1,244 9,410 1 1 175 2,450 1 1 1901-15 37 V46 24,411 68.549 19 19 9,016 60,626 8 10 2,179 26,235 6 9 Building Trades 1901 1902 1903 1904 1906 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 ■1911-16 4 11 10 10 10 9 8 2 6 2 31 22 17 21 36 44 124 ^62 2 3 27 180 172 1^12 i977 1211 484 680 617 533 335 ■ 479 ^715 2,693 2,248 2,601 373 743 1,028 1,477 1,624 1,340 1,703 2,860 7,634 1 6 . 4 2 2 6 4 6 3 5-40 1,13 2 1420 fcl4 24 35 532 885 87 120 6,015 100 268 280 4,079 7,470 447 1,020 40,395 808 1,996 2 6 1 2 1 4 2 1 3 2 6 3 110 3 12 "76 40 30 96 70 80 85 837 250 393 12 603 275 600 368 400 2,112 1,090 10,082 2,250 3,537 120 6,130 3,325 6,000 6,096 4,000 27,022 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 23 ■ ii 71 1 36 11 "2 9 3 22 427 168 7,168 1,100 64,871 1 100 1901-16 102 707 8,236 23,431 54 979 16,368 112,466 30 620 6,376 68,662 22 254 Metal TaadeB 1901 1902 1903 ' 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1010 '1911-16 7 7 1 7 5 6 4 3 6 8 1 7 23 79 7 3 ■s'Sis 272 40 1,271 266 424 294 279 2,188 707 40 6,364 764 1,303 702 1,080 3 4 3 3 m 6 207 409 1,280 167 1,406 2,163 11,240 980 1 6 1 9 7 200 576 400 2,400 5,970 26,800 1 2 10 2 1 1 1 1 6 5 51 18 1,611 166 10,946 1,197 1 2 2 1 1 6 1 1 2 1 6 31 33 91 85 14 26 1,116 330 910 975 168 286 13,223 1 1 1 2 20 3 66 66 164 2,676 496 1,230 21,293 6 31 6 80 1,413 6,220 1,641 21,444 ■3 '3 1901-15 76 219 11,087 35,233 47 149 6,726 60,949 20 58 2,639 61,062 9 18 STRIKES AND LOOKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 1915, by Industries and Duration. 101 20 Days. 21 10 30 Days. OvEB 30 Days. Unobetaiw. Total. ■sl 1 il Q •3 i 1^ ^1 r 1 .9 . II .|.9 •s 1 o S Z ^1 1 .S . II ■s 1 d S 1 .9 . II I' 1 •s ,1 ^1 1 ■ r 1 tl .1-9 8,000 136,000 1 1 2 1 1 2 "ii 8,000 30 4,100 1,170 136,000 30 49,200 4,400 1 1 70 1 1 iso 125 640 1,000 1 1 •■•■' 180 126 540 1,000 ^ *" 1 4 300 6,300 1 1 72 648 2 5 372 6,948 1 9 600 46,600 1 3 160 6,400 3 37 2,750 56,000 8,000 136,000 1 4 300 6,300 1 9 600 45,600 7 6 627 7,588 13 55 16,727 253,088 2 1 1 1 2 1 126 '30 4 3 4 2 4 3 3 3 925 300 1,200 216 3,200 2,790 2,500 1,000 1 40 720 1 15 • 300 4,800 2 2 750 24,660 6 2 4 2 2 7 10 5 3 2 2 36 1,290 453 428 300 460 2,826 30,490 6,081 14,066 6,600 4,350 141,670 3 226 5,625 1 75 12,825 2 2 300 6,600 1 11 1,660 i^4,8s6 1 200 200 •300 4,800 2 4 265 6,346 4 13 2,375 172,225 8 6 670 6,800 36 70 8,386 212,647 1 1,000 50,000 ♦ 6 3 9 7 13 14 13 9 10 4 29 7 3 10 9 14 14 53 13 20 6 103 3,686 510 11,931 3,161 8,446 6,496 13,260 3,119 8,795 2,338 26,231 56,660 9,720 440,455 24,866 115,481 187,780 203 949 1 3 1 3 200 8,663 6,600 425,683 1 2 216 3,870 1 1 104 740 860 20,100 860 60 3 1 1 3 1 7 620 36 3,450 9,840 665 62,100 3 2 3 2 6 2 6 2 2 32 6 15 2 46 870 1,400 4,300 641 7,150 1,934 10,000 83,660 154,100 113,650 19,933 686,760 367,966 1,839,550 1 16 36 612 6,100 30,271 711,207 377,100 2,670,688 300 1 1 2 1 3 2 712 380 191 9,412 9,120 4,266 1 418 8,460 900 16,300 5 33 7,279 676,290 2,136 41,962 10 19 5,603 99,273 26 109 35,158 3,697,882 10 40 9,557 734,740 116 262 87,960 4,728,167 2,386 3,000 6,686 10,076 760 8,960 2,010 4 1 10 4 2 1 8 1 4 8 24 66 60 276 69 103 4 253 1 161 472 646 1,490 145 4,765 629 519 62 1,941 53 1,708 2,455 9,687 66,790 3,916 312,766 20,407 27,775 5,580 136,216 2,491 40,001 87,600 347,103 2 5 14 6 5 6 12 1 29 134 181 48 42 26 52 491 1,243 1,165 285 469 283 14 31 44 30 24 29 44 12 13 26 128 108 258 653 461 248 716 494 94 288 1,143 1,656 2,633 3,667 8,783 6,041 1,766 8; 464 5,278 1,661 2,680 9,446 26,607 62,793 200 2 3 4 3 2 8 2 2 196 90 60 14 88 37 376 990 2,668 200 270 2,004 405 7,250 21,120 68,484 4,017 5,740 39,111 9,130 626 7,000 21,000 357,663 124,693 34,710 69,472 186,063 20,967 47,100 161,436 667,194 518 142 1,200 1,970 1 3 20 4 204 181 26 3,770 2,033 300 26,000 72,600 520 1,480 7,300 14,129 6 7 132 149 1,428 1,434 23,676 33,936 4,133 66,184 36 808 9,774 212,463 67 2,000 23,454 1,040,642 33 850 9,806 129,070 394 6,118 76,606 1,641,808 38 670 4,920 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 10 2 2 4 18 13 1 14 3 5 2 86 2 14 46 71 69 118 348 1,640 94 123 1,688 120 270 371 1,896 4,697 6,098 10,903 75,600 4,378 6,718 89,000 13,640 19,700 26,600 96,809 5 7 6 3 6 6 8 7 20 10 5 10 107 246 399 67 406 259 450 20 23 16 17 14 23 23 9 5 15 103 62 33 41 26 36 147 116 15 17 76 298 1,239 1,963 2,688 3,181 1,509 2,616 2,282 960 499 2,081 13,763 11,710 20,488 74,517 82,796 19,442 20,821 92,113 61,887 23,883 30,267 237,022 35 221 630 9,664 i5,8s6 952 221 13 2 6 2 4 2 7 1 16 31 741 65 32 18 160 84 466 14,079 1,624 128 468 3,520 1,600 12,220 11 176 1 1 458 35,724 1 10 1 26 23 1,079 311 6,354 66,679 737 12,193 19 67 1,822 43,823 49 266 6,737 352,943 53 88 3,033 118,733 273 866 32,680 664,936 102 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table Xll.^Industrial Disputes, 1901, Year. 5 Days ob Less. 6 TO 10 Days. 11 TO 15 Days. 16 TO Industry or Occupation. 1 •s i 1^ ■"1 i .3 . 1.1 ■s d Z i 1^ 1 .S . 1.1 1 •3 1 II I* 1 a ■s ft •sf 1^ Woodworkinp Trades. . 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-15 2 13 366 9,806 2 2 1 6 i 720 100 45 5,040 620 495 1 3 1 1 6 1 95 270 112 1,235 7,616 1,456 1 2 1 3 1 17 1 146 9 331 18 2 r 1 1 1 1 7 15 42 75 1 1 200 400 1 T 1 1 20 40 2 2 2 2 100 122 600 1,053 1 1 • 1901-16 8 33 731 10,595 11 13 1,109 7,925 . 5 8 477 10,306 6 5 Printing and Allied 1901 1902 1903 1901 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 ■1911-15 . 1 1 9 108 1 1 1 1 5 160 15 231 1 22 168 1,000 1 3 - 1 16 9 8 100 69 30 400 128 120 1 1 70 490 1 3 40 200 1 9 28 262 1901-15 8 33 384 1,094 2 > 10 98 742 2 23 177 1,108 Textiles 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-15 2 2 57 132 1 1 2,625 20,200 1 1 210 2,100 2 2 331 381 2 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 215 98 134 1,944 3,157 1,200 1,290 882 804 10,314 27,972 6,000 1 1 18 162 . 1 1 SO 450 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 35 - 18 105 90 1 1 1 12 120 3 3 678 2,785 3 3 980 6,249 2 2 706 8,366 1901-16 9 9 1,119 3,493 15 16 10,263 73,711 6 6 996 11,198 2 2 Clothing 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-16 5 3 2 5 3 19 13 11 10 3 442 83 240 135 262 858 147 655 476 558 1 3 2 1 4 2 4 2 9 46 1 4 2 7 80 43 715 34 107 60 1,162 560 246 4,490 204 810 325 8,080 1 8 3 3 1 2 4 1 3 4 25 2 7 1 453 84 100 190 446 79 6,694 862 1,100 2,140 5,692 474 1 1 .... 8 2 3 1 1 1 13 3 1 1 1 22 107 16 130 60 927 413 64 520 300 2,347 .... 2 2 9 2 1 43 186 222 3,095 1,304 1,476 20,271 2 1 2,030 24,130 3 2 1901-15 37 84 2,402 6,338 30 116 5,704 37,765 16 43 3,382 40,082 7 21 Food, LiquoTB and 1001 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-16 2 2 36 76 1 1 1 1 15 12 120 84 1 I 1 1 30 330 3 1 1 3 9 1 194 46 21 1,792 180 106 2 2 206 1,454 2 1 1 1 78 624 1 6 25 275 3 4 18 13 125 280 370 660 3 17 335 1,864 1 1 1901-15 14 46 701 3,183 8 22 646 4,146 2 7 55 60S 4 3 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1&16 103 1915, by Industries and Duration — Continued. 20 Days. 21 TO 30 Days. OvEK 30 Days. Uncbhtain. Total. i 1 H 1 "S J 3 i 1^ 1, is 1 P •3 1 "a ^ •si 1^ •sl 1^ 1 P 1 Q i 1 1 1 ■0 1^ 1 wis 1 1 2 2 1 ■ 23 1 36 305 181 2,500 12,250 9,123 1 1 4 1 1 3 30 58 335 6 7 15 3 2 6 ? 2 2 6 21 25 30 3 3 20 7 \ 2 60 1,141 606 1,014 142 162 916 236 17 36 100 690 17,346 48 720 605 367 14,825 37 18,069 1,831 31 1 1 1 1 1 2 8 5 1 8 145 80 200 17 16 8,700 4,800 5,800 1,326 704 8,742 ' 2 2 20 126 1 1 8 1 600 9 6,401 6,401 26 520 81 ' 1,326 744 600 18 304 1 3 70 1,500 2 44 480 28,520 31,377, 160 2,406 3 5 90 1,626 12 93 1,469 73,723 8 14 1,032 81 63 171 5,048 106,662 1 2 1 4 2 1 2 "12 8 16 24 6 277 160 2 3 3 4 6 6 2 1 2 3 23 12 44 18 9 1 24 29 324 277 446 197 39 40 108 15 1,231 1 1 166 2,400 2 2 19 8 96 68 6, "436 2,740 8,236 3,368 201 1 1 1 1 9 40 81 360 360 1 4 3 42 40 329 200 1 10 21 903 2 23 280 3,460 4,605 - 1 1 100 2,400 6 37 185 9,079 14 48 801 3,891 32 157 1,745 18,314 1 1 1 1 44 6 800 5 1 6 3 1 5 6 6 2 2 9 5 1 4 3 1 6 6 8 2 2 9 2,836 6 1,346 134 134 2,234 3,397 7,542 948 315 2,478 23,232 1 1 800 16,000 17,671 1 1 18 1,044 804 200 3,400 3,280 1 1 40 060 15,124 205 31,357 136,972 3 2 4 2 6,312 948 129,762 33,380 33,380 2 1 2 1 315 114 20,950 9,690 20,960 27,090 405 6,680 2 2 840 16,960 3 3 429 30,640 8 9 7,328 163,942 45 47 21,370 306,624 795 3 2 3 2 40 37 10 8 11 11 11 9 17 8 11 11 51 32 24 63 21 60 16 29 12 14 36 166 616 163 6,754 291 1,146 560 2,278 950 736 1,552 21,454 2,213 392 1 4 102 1,938 3 6,244 160,783 173,560 27 432 2,400 1 4 11 1,964 150 1 1 419 9,637 1 19 107 4,173 18,678 5 4 2 2 3 11 11 4 2 3 3 49 310 288 165 153 113 6,672 ■6,095 1,470 2,240 964 213,188 2,465 2 3 4 5 10 8 7 5 31 36 276 350 163 1,157 8,333 12,775 10,360 6,158 37,675 319,878 33,066 340 4,700 17,068 2 ■3 3 ■■■3 114 "122 2,316 ■2,' 975 12,538 276 "41950 40,416 687,739 846 13,277 7 11 767 16,866 28 106 15,619 551,792 33 81 7,789 223,967 158 462 36,498 890,077 1 1 30 750 6 5 15 6 12 666 227 207 40 10 10 6 11 4 8 2 1 2 8 16 19 20 28 14 13 20 1 1 5 46 55 746 310 280 666 151 257 47 83 76 698 1,176 986 126 3 1 3 13 15 4 62 43 162 2,856 2,279 3,136 3,066 2,609 2 6 114 2,052 8,434 61 926 3 8 45 93 1,106- 2 4 40 ■ 630 160 1,784 1 1 47 1,128 1,128 1,328 1 1 6 24 83 10 30 188 1,328 60 400 6,475 1 4 66 3,835 3,895 1 2 5 2 208 340 4,992 7,920 7,626 160 3,000 4 15 218 13,667 31,722 220 4,052 7 14 739 16.842 14 66 580 26,403 28 76 1,548 8,453 77 222 4,489 63,684 104 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table XII. — Industrial Disputes, 1901, Year. 5 Days on Liss. 6 TO 10 Days. 11 TO 15 Days. 16 TO InduBtry or Occupation. "S 1 •s 6 'A II of 1^ 11 r 1 ..a . II I* 1 •3 1 ■sf 1^ 1^ 1 1 ■3 1 si 1^ Leather 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-16 1 2 1 2 36 79 72 188 ' 2 2 90 540 ^ 1 1 28 140 , 2 17 187 674 1 1 1901-16 5 20 302 934 3 3 118 680 1 1 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 U911-15 8 a 3 1 4 7 7 6 2 3 20 7 2 16 1 6 9 17 15 2 4 65 439 1,920 3,305 8 568 1,215 926 482 300 170 6,251 480 3,040 3,410 40 1,831 3,915 1,715 1,672 700 265 20,373 1 1 2 1 ij 27 190 1,512 324 2,280 16,620 1 1 9 3 600 150 4,800 1,360 1 3 7 3 4 29 867 544 3,441 6,142 3,812 24,037 2 8 1,021 10,210 / 1 1 700 4,200 2 1 1 12 1 1 425 550 140 4,900 7,150 1,960 1 1 1 6 59 1,180 34,460 1 1901-15 64 143 15,573 37,341 19 108 7,472 77,801 10 36 3,865 43,444 2 2 Miscellaneous 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 "1911-16 1 1 1 1 16 1 36 600 22 216 4,800 110 2 40 105 1 3 1 1 1 700 880 18 400 16 2,800 1,790 36 1,400 48 1 1 96 864 1 2 2 2 2 2 68 14 637 70 1 6 40 480 1 1 10 1 9 1 21 20 481 40 1,296 6 25 353 3,036 2 3 684 8,570 3 3 1901-15 19 31 2,556 7,516 13 47 1,093 8.769 4 9 720 • 9,914 6 16 Unskilled Labour 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908' 1909 1910 •1911-15 7 6 4 2 1 7 6 8 7 1 9 6 6 3 2 1 6 6 9 7 1 10 635 437 1,336 240 40 374 2,046 1,696 993 18 2,816 1,047 973 2,131 520 80 920 6,608 3,840 3,199 18 8,062 1 1 62 434 1 1 6 36 1 1 193 2,123 1 1 1 1 1 1 96 865 1 1 7 42 2 2 4 2 3 4 300 310 2,348 1,600 1,824 14,438 1 2 20 240 1901-15 68 461 87 10,730 26,298 11 238 12 3,033 18,374 3 "l09 4 733 308 • 3,218 2 2 Grand Total 1,496 84,682 243,691 1,500 61,668 460,472 24,925 318,696 69 339 'For individual years see page 74 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 1915, by Industries and Duration — Concluded. 105 20 Dj^yb. 21 TO 30 p AYS. OvEK 30 Days. Uncebtain. TOTAI. 1^ 1 ■s 1 1' 1 ,11 ■s d 1 1^ 1 .9 . •s 1 1 "ti If 1^ 1 1 .9 . II ■s i 1. 1 Jl 1 3 4 1 1 3 8 2 36 85 178 26 72 1 3 6 35 188 1 3 53 2,644 3,084 1 2 25 252 262 2 1 2 1 51 16 1,968 880 3 6 3 20 79 316 2,108 86 1,376 1 27 601 3,431 2 1 2 7 4 3 81 72 65 6,231 2,664 2,270 2 1 3 7 4 4 81 72 80 6,231 2,664 1 16 300 2,670 86 1,376 1 2 25 252 9 20 338 15,567 6 83 801 23 52 962 19,600 1 5,000 315,000 11 10 16 2 5 16 17 7 7 7 39 9 17 46 2 9 17 54 16 17 8 145 5,466 3,136 8,851 103 1,416 2,178 5,637 8,482 1,505 3,820 12,653 315; 804 5 4 426 3,203 10,120 1 9 30 sio 3 1 661 96 47,151 9,600 69,341 '9,640 6,973 4 i 410 8,970 9 250 i.'MO 16,697 40,212 1 8,000 424,000 425,572 2 80 200 10,000 2,600 1,400 37,500 28,000 2 1 600 300 36,000 44,000 80,915 3 3 1,185 30,610 8 16 2,097 62,736 212,139 3,900 65,500 8 16 1,625 40,390 9 9 14,646 875,651 24 26 6,064 67,186 136 340 53,145 1,197,313 2 • 2 69 500 3 6 4 2 ■7 5 7 2 2 1 32 3 23 10 f 19 25 2 2 1 168 105 1,098 297 796 1,000 95 834 416 112 20 2,019 716 1 2 70 1,400 388 200 20,496 1,400 26,801 15 360 1 6 60 1,870 ' 3,664 1 35 666 1 2 3 1 16 8 17 63 168 2,992 520 1.285 626 20 340 5,600 ... 216 8,916 12,421 5,648 93 5,270 1 1 19 260 5,520 40 165 3,108 9 100 3,313 8 97 336 16,750 35,073 600 9,408 2 3 105 2,065 9 15 997 39,395 18 131 722 18,306 71 262 6,792 95,371 ~ 3 3 38 11 I 4 2 11 7 8 9 6 20 10 7 8 4 2 10 7 9 9 7 33 735 472 2,296 280 60 601 2,053 1,695 1,293 348 15,104 1,481 1 1 1 1 36 60 735 1,140 1,708 9,100 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 50 40 20 132 300 14,830 620 ' 1,'356 80 3,131 5,550 3,840 4,799 1 3 I 2,082 2 2 3,250 86,600 2 16 6,250 366,000 440 950 475,960 650 9,100 4 4 3,345 88,375 2 15 6,260 366,000 13 12 720 2,606 93 106 24,936 613,971 361,938 103 960 25,290 663,980 238 2,740 108.827 7.297,432 311 1,391 49,780 1,476,123 1,519 9,159 377,234 10,712,262 106 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table XIII. — Industrial Disputes In Favour of Employees. In Favour of Employer. .ii>S "o is «!-< Cause or Object. Year. .1 Time loss .1 i^L Time loss b (• t.j3 e: I, f. U.JS >^ a&% in |s III SI'S Working Days. |s ill Working Days. z a ^ - z ^ iC For increase in wages 1901 9f 83 10 74] 145,809 8,666 6 f 5,41C 52C .316, .537 1,770 1902 27 66 2,35£ 7 7 1903 ■17 209 6,69f 89,90^ 15 22s 7,91i 319,691 1904 IJ 45 2,747 25,035 9 71 4,57] 142,003 1905 li 65 3,78; 14,344 f IC 1,316 6,601 (1906 m 143 4,44; 24, IK U • 30 1,576 25,651 19U7 21 78 3,788 31,436 U 23 6,«8{ 122,725 1908 E 17 866 7,45J IS 14 1,932 6,525 1909 b 28 • 52!) 3,062 V 1< 1,524 16,110 1910 11 358 2,834 34,982 la 142 1,824 69,684 11911-15 1901-15 1901 6b 934 21,572 179,735 61 221 17,524 598,167 222 4 2,020 60,349 564,536 175 766 50,198 1,624,464 Against reduction in wages. . . 4 53 137 3 3 184 1,080 1902 1903 2 1 2 1 420 30 4,350 330 3 3o 1,315 21,140 1904 1905 1906 1907 4 1 4 1 87 25 797 150 "'i 1 72' 1 12 400 800 1 3 225 5,625 1908 3 32 685 9,040 10 45 7,071 150,985 1909 1 11 200 2,200 2 6 200 12,850 1910 3 3 354 8,856 3 3 178 1,140 11911-15 1901-15 1901 1902 8 35 2,324 4,578 i5 54,837 20 71 5,786 100,552 28 "l 105 " 1 81,497 43 167 15,031 293,. 372 For shorter hours 15 1 1 1903 3 16 683 18, 124 4 6 596 33,296 1904 1905 2 3 2 21 15 241 130 2 9 115 9,840 14,136 1906 5 35 145 3,315 4 12 146 4,930 1907 8 79 1,727 46,929 3 5 419 11,000 1908 1 5 200 14,200 1 7 18 468 1909 1 4 65 3,835 2 2 70 140 1910 11911-15 1901-15 1901 '"5 26 "36 '9 ""is ' 1,063 306 7,143 14,943 185 3,256 103,401 29 71 2,668 78,943 For increased wages and shorter hours. 7 17 1,629 30,182 3 14 410 10,680 1902 13 182 1,763 29,685 2 3 296 3,230 1903 lb 218 2,315 38,206 4 2 470 10,400 1904 8 70 793 12,566 1 3 15 120 1905 4 49 240 4,331 1 1 30 90 1906 2 9 116 836 1 32 175 500 1907 2 15 2 290 236 4,570 7,012 1908 1 10 22 22 2 1909 1910 1 4 3 387 9 2,025 407 ■34,550 "1 . 15 160 7,200 11911-15 1901-15 17 114 4,557 55,757 8 41 1,879 18,397 72 1,059 13,469 206,542 25 12s 3,960 62,099 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 107 1901-1915, by Causes and Eesults. Compromise. Indefinite. Total. 1 n ^1^ III (25 "o ^ 111 Time loss in Working Days. 4 wl ■ lls Time loss in Working Days. 1 •sis III Time loss in Working Days. 1 5 5 3 "is 19 2 10 46 31 7 ■■■■i70 250 i 210 47 311 170 1,232 918 1,234 ■3,'336 5,924 SI 8 1,763 438 6,221 170 12,852 3,873 5,204 36,8i6 85,106 1,290 38,000 5,450 136,951 8 8 10 7 10 8 6 18 34 30 17 178 9 6 1,891 900 627 195 1,843 411 579 51,225 6,560 620 468 44,004 5,424 17,955 40 47 47 32 28 60 62 20 29 37 188 116 153 493 140 253 352 357 33 257 552 1,590 18,212 5,007 16,153 8,747 6,940 9,758 16,379 3,316 4,188 5,659 48,046 513,741 29,848 414,088 172,710 04,949 92,001 257,222 15,268 7 8 41 2 5 20 5 124 372 563 2,729 9,924 22,090 59,680 66,096 132,206 974,433 109 1,084 21,548 325,712 84 426 10,110 217,850 590 4,296 142,205 2,732,562 1 1 1 1 800 80 3,200 160 4 4 1 2 - 5 2 3 1 2 7 1,074 96 25 1,980 244 4,240 325 3,720 3,0.59 12 7 5 6 8 3 17 6 6 44 10 6 37 6 10 "15 81 23 6 153 2,111 596 1,370 2,067 353 " 750 8,772 993 532 11,045 28,589 8,657 4,510 21,795 .4,517 1 1 12 60 3,267 1 1 3 6 125 458 593 1,000 35,724 16,770 7,425 3 3 558 5,536 201,285 31,820 9,996 4 5 270 2,230 12 42 2,665 136,525 294,144 10 11 1,720 11,186 33 64 7,260 201,363 114 347 587,418 ""1,460 1 5 8 4 6 13 1-2 4 3 19 1 6 22 5 31 394 1,291 307 376 1 1 2 1 200 200 20 6,600 i,6oc 20 3 1 1 '"4 "1 4 ""1 "i6 ""7 179 12 92 8,015 51,420 1 X 460 1,490 23,996 ""276 55 1 1 1 1,000 140 7,000 280 63 85 20 6 57 561 3,146 413 135 1,812 8,245 1 " 1,'436 64,929 16,378 3,975 5 6 12 443 3,740 25,826 10 2,003 18,640 10 28 60i< 3,290 75 296 8,435 204,274 1 1 I 1 50 75 12 600 525 180 1 4 4 1 14 125 400 495 309 400 17,600 6,350 828 12,000 12 20 24 10 5 6 11 4 2 6 36 31 190 235 198 50 45 124 13 4 402 276 2,489 2,628 3,106 1,208 270 451 5,443 274 64 2,185 12,163 58,962 39,796 49,614 24,686 4,421 1 79 1 1 140 5,043 16 55 280 90,657 48 495 1 1 3 , 30 20 110 1,616 8 1 7,700 102,927 7,082 1 1 902 41,750 7 106 1,060 38,315 4 15 4,667 157,925 270,394 23 189 6,451 131,100 16 192 6,401 202,403 136 1,568 30,281 602,144 108 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUE, CANADA Table XIIL— Industrial Disputes 1901-1915, / In Favour of Employees. In Favour of Employer, A\iy^ 1 Cause or Object. Year. A m Time Lobs ■sg. %u °N Time Loss SH-S S I. Q-S i-.fl ^■^ ^ uoS in SQ ^ll Working .SQ g;S^ •Sfl Working a-s o Days. s Days. '^ fc iz; « <5 Izi For recognition of union 1901 1 1 35 2,500 1902 1 1 16 32 1 1 40 1,820 1903 6 8 11,367 315,788 3 3 938 74,760 1904 1 11 35( 3,150 1905 1906 ' 1 200 1,800 10,800 2 2 264 3,464 1907 1 5 4C 480 1908 1909 i 4il 4i8 8,450 1910 >1911-15 1901-15 1901 3 26 242 2,752 6 n 1,657 247,756 11 235 13,425 329,372 16 35 3,742 341,840 Against employment of non- 4 4 112 798 unionists. 1902 3 3 72 384 1 1 12 84 1903 1 1 175 525 4 4 425 10,514 1904 6 22 172 1,902 3 4 103 2,086 1905 2 4 135 239 2 3 118 936 1906 '6 9 1,845 46,885 5 12 204 1,005 1907 3 3 3,600 21,600 7 13 350 17,622 1908 1 5 50 1,550 2 2 103 1,868 1909 1 1 8 576 5 6 388 4,761 \ 1910 2 230 3,780 25,750 2 4 465 13,200 '1911-15 1901-16 3 3 296 1,347 5 6 285 4,218 27 281 10,133 100.758 40 59 2,565 57,092 For increase in wages and other changes. 1901 2 60 408 15,000 1 1 20 960 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1 2 1 3 3 1 3 4 23 79 1,000 277 25 325 261 2,000 3.033 125 10,150 2,034 1 6 14 "4 11 738 5,.S73 1907 2 42 3,140 12,560 6 129 1,098 97,891 1908 1909 1 1 1 51 6 1,200 36 12,125 1 I 908 32,700 . 1910 2 2 57 1,036 2 2 146 22,100 11911-15 1901-15 6 41 421 8,233 11 80 1,075 27,188 24 307 7,420 66,331 26 230 2,924 186,212 Against discharge of employee? . 1901 1902 ' 3 1 3 1 188 160 970 1,920 3 256 4,056 1903 '> 2 42 207 8,778 1904 4 4 207 1,639 3 3 153 1905 4 8 3,947 19,804 4 4 93 1,143 1906 2 5 57 496 7 7 586 6,049 1907 2 2 53 170 6 6 197 4,416 1908 6 6 1,309 150 6,920 C,4S0 1909 1 1 75 375 1 J 1910 2 2 625 7,900 124,665 '1911-15 1901-15 4 4 241 4,836 620 8 8 1,497 20 22 27,760 43 43 5,000 168,418 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 109 by Causes and Results — Continued. , Compromise , Indefinite. Total. 1 |s 1 Soil 116 lis? Time Loss in Working 1 a s •A ^ a g III 'A Time Losb in Working Days. OD of 1 ■ssl III III |t| Time^Loss in Working Days. " 2 6 60 8 69 136 460 150 540 11,400 11,250 1 4 13 3 3 3 2 1 17 79 9 202 9 35 125 14,641 825 250 2,064 56 2,500 2 3 1 2 "l 1,852 1 8 1 2,200 25 100 4oi,948 1 1 325 2,400 14,725 2,400 14,264 4 16 "4,' 216 1,700 3,600 480 3 1 2 10 1 4 493,504 360,000 588,400 4 1 14 11 1 73 4,6.S4 1,700 , 6,659 501,954 360,000 3 32 ],160 191,380 1,030,288 6 41 3,485 194,105 15 95 10,337 1,465,094 48 406 30,989 128 136 716 370 534 2,347 4,152 183 428 4,270 7,721 2,330,411 1 4 4 2 1 6 1 1 2 1 2 1 4 6 .2 4 13 1 5 1 16 16 52 116 95 271 2a8 162 30 ' 32 25 4,140 360 9,500 813 70 4,335 l-.'O 307 1,250 8,360 5 8 9 10 5 16 18 4 8 5 12 5 8 10 , 28 7 25 30 8 12 235 40 798 468 11,399 13,488 1,988 ' "i 1 40 ■■- ""so 47,960 43,637 3,538 5,644 40,200 2 16 3,000 117,000 130,925 3 17 3,040 117,080 30 51 5,237 25,115 100 408 20,976 300,045 2 12 715 40 6,125 1 3 1 13 6 5 3 2 3 11 13 2 6 8 29 74 14 9 5 23 94 174 2 56 ,52 236 1,143 1,124 291 100 326 1,788 5,026 6 3,398 3,088 13,322 29,611 22,085 ' 1 34 928 2,928 3,033 1 / 1 75 375 500 ""2 2 10,150 2 5 2 3 1 3 42 102 754 788 ■l,'256 2,855 8,080 116,532 5,873 ' 30,500 46,670 1,444,650 35 600 124,539 116,324 1 3 •J 7 "1 1 5 1 6 13 40 30 3,446 680 400 106,267 36 76,005 70,205 .1,586,328 26 166 14,557 1,650,725 13 36 3,635 108,865 88 739 2,012,13? ' 2 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 2,550 150 667 51 20,300 1,970 64,501 252 5 7 6 9 8 10 10 6 3 2 14 5 7 5 10 7 3 10 6 3 2 15 2,738 566 709 411 4,040 ~ 677 337 1,309 270 625 4,438 21,270 8,546 64,708 10,669 20,947 1 1 1 1 34 37 5,545 1 1 50 2,900 960 8,446 6,920 1 1 45 2,475 9,300 7,900 2 3 2,700 46,100 171,385 1 1 50 2,900 10 17 6,234 136,658 80 83 16,120 335,636 110 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table XIII.— Industrial Disputes 1901-lSfl5, Year. ■ In Favour of Employees. In Favour of Employer. Cause or Object. ^1 III m at lug Time Loss in Working Days. i .Sfi s 3 a ° s S ,50 III Time Loss in Working Days. Sympathetic disputes 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 "1911-15 1901-15 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 190B 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-15 1901-15 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 '1911-18 1901-lB "3 ■■■ 2 119 418 "2 1 "i 2 1 ■" 4 64 " ' 1 6 1 250 550 17 HI 400 i,'350 i2 92 120 700 8,800 ' 1 1 ■■■'i 1,950 5,600 3 6 27 6 971 487 29,274 2 2 195 2,510 9,859 7 5 418 52 9 181 3,748 IG 3 1 2 2 109 2,766 56,83.'i Against employment of par- ticular persons. 1 1 4 1 1 3 104 63 312 3 1 2 35 40 16 43 160 320 32 28 1 2 1 1 2 1 450 39 20 900 1,421- 180 2 2 1 2 2 2 66 49 1,200 415 3,881 6,000 1 3 4 1 3 26 179 541 1,439 1,253 ],11( 8,166 4 8 47 203 800 443 11,127 18 39 2,910 13,512 25 64 2,452 291 322 43 388 129 21 227 8,355 30 308 2,761 13,185 Unclassified 3 2 6 S 6 8 2 2 3 2 27 11 6 207 2 2 42 45 1,380 304 ,1,261 6,439 77 65 50 15 9,332 3,198 15,625 51,829 315 2,503 3 2 1 3 3 2 2 5 1 2 22 3 1 15 3 5 2 2 5 1 29 92 572 16,800 2,279^ 5,684 386 105 9,048 439,926 900 3 21 17 43 882 4,192 1,666 33,849 5,800 77,554 ,58 320 14,693 118,282 46 158 12,875 559,053 Grand Total 613 4,578 135,487 1,616,739 484 1,830 104,081 3,441,511 ' For individual years see page 78. STEIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 111 by Causes and Results — Concluded. Compromiae. Indefinite. Total. J r ^1^ ■sal Iz; III Iz; Time Loss in Working Days. 1 S-Sg 29 890 866 Time Loss in Working Days. ill III 09 Time Loss in Working Days. ] 9 200 2,400 1 3 3 1 1 20 21 5,' 220 2,880 2 6 6 2 1 2 2 1 10 22 36 64 2 « 1 229 1,009 2,616 550 12 109 91 400 2,400 5,638 1 U 1,500 16,500 20,730 8,800 • 120 700 1,950 5,600 3 11 27 64 971 6,372 12,359 29,274 a 1 150 3,noo 2 55 5,540 241,000 256,369 3 21 1,850 21,900 10 97 7,325 58 249,100 36 232 331,581 4 3 22 8 2 6 7 3 6 4 1 1 8 18 7 1 4 20 3 6 4 2 1 9 79 145 49 ]97 146 517 230 99 1,200 179 964 3,117 286 383 344 1 1 14 252 4 2 1 1 17 2 1 1 89 67 40 30 114 394 900 1 1 85 425 ""i,'ii6 2,268 5,171 6,000 1,253 1 1 4 7 220 730 15,180 9,100 16,739 4 2 2 128 200 28,583 7 1,049 24,957 14 2C 412 1,446 64 136 6,843 62,321 6 5 10 6 7 3 8 7 6 15 6 13 3 7 523 245 5,851 1,059 450 1,205 441 99u 149 172,804 4,143 2,793 8,325 4,086 12 10 19 14 19 14 12 9 7 S 64 13 9 59 20 44 213 11 9 24 49 197 856 630 8,951 1,751 2,616 8,065 745 9,620 3,043 1,286 13,264 1,612 1 2 1 2 18 1,671 1,998 3,006 18,962 187,421 13,025 3 1 20 1 776 400 65,300 2,400 84,104 62,659 13,451 2 2 21 1,200 2,900 3,750 172,440 446,178 4 2 3 16 2 3 29 113 96 2,846 1,556 2,999 74,876 174,896 10,365 5 83 3,465 14,785 201,064 18 80 10,430 263,679 66 90 ■ 12,829 252,723 188 648 50,827 377,234 1,213,737 215 1,629 66,183 2,761,984 307 1,122 70,388 2,883,807 1,519 9,159 10,712,262 7. TABLES OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES IN OTHER COUNTRIES. XIV. Canada and Other Coimtries. XV. Australia. XVI. Austria. XVII. Belgium. XVIII. France. XIX. Germany. XX. Holland. XXI. Italy. XXII. Spain. XXin, Sweden. XXIV. United Kingdom. XXV. United States. 28163—8 114 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table XIV. — Industrial Disputes in Canada and Year. Canada. United Kingdom. Australia. United States. France. Italy.' Population total ul all occupa- tions 7,206,643 (1911) 2,723,634 45,370,530 (1911) 20,158,650 4,455,005 (1911) 1,981,964 91,972; 266 (1910) 38,167,336 39,601,509 (1911) 20,210,012 34,671,377 (1911) 16,301,741 NUMBER OP 1911 99 150 113 44 43 903 ■ 857 1,497 999 706 1 1 208 337 358 1 1 1,080 1,405 1,471 1,116 '1,073 672 98 1,244 1912 1,116 1913. '. . 928 1914. 2890 1915 2599 449 4,962 903 4,430 4,777 NUMBER OP EMPLOYEES 1911 1912 1913 30,094 40,511 39,636 8,678 9,140 961,980 1,463,281 688,92b 448,529 452,571 1 1 50,2S3 71,049 81,292 230,646 267,627 220.448 ■ 160;566 18,550 402,750 253,186 485,665 ^207,675 ^73,533 1914 1915 127,959 4,015,286 202,624 1 897,837 1,522,709 AGGREGATE DURATION OP 1911 2,046,650 1,099,208 1,287,678 430,054 106,149 10,319,591 40,914,635 11,630,732 10,111,337 3,038,134 I 1 623,528 1,090,395 533,225 • \ 3,595,614 1,958,.'J22 2,200,759 2,187,272 55,278 1912 1913. 1914 1915. 4,969,739 76,014,469 2,297,148 1 9,990,445 1 ' Not ava 2 Lock-ou ' Nine mi liable. ts not available yatha . ■ STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 115 the United Kingdom and Other Gonntries 1911-1915. Belgium. Spain. Holland. Sweden. Germany. Austria. 7,423,784 (1910) . 19,995,446 (1910) 6,022,452 (1911) 2,361,635 5,622,403 . (1910) ^ 64,925,993 (1910) 28,324,940 (1910) INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES. 162 146 217 98 2,798 728 206 >92 278 116 2,834 801 167 133 427 119 2,464 461 86 197 271 115 1,223 278 1 152 268 80 141 1 621 719 > 1,461 528 9,460 2,268 AFFECTED BY DISPUTES. 57,203 63,772 23,752 12,639 1 42,386 318,570 38,743 80,098 54,517 19,905 21,479 30,159 15,419 12,932 20,576 9,980 9,591 14,385 5,119 356,163 481,094 311,048 95,140 12,866 128,374 145,248 62,072 40,32M 1 157,366 234,314 90,894 59,651 1,256,311 376,023 DISPUTES IN WOKKINO DAYS. J 435,042 458,606 787,876 361,400 1 569,849 292,145 303,344 620,469 83,270 ] 2,042,924 1,869,077 1,813,496 2,333,294 1,481,269 379,945 6,008,004 28163— 8J 116 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table XV.— Industrial Disputes in the Commonwealth of Australia, 1913-1915.1 NUMBER OF DISPUTES. Group of Industries. Building Mining and quarrying Metal trader, engineering, etc Wood, sawmill, timber, etc Clothing trades food, drink, etc., manufacture »nd distribution Printing and paper trades Other manufacturing Transport trades Agriculture, etc Other Total 1913. 208 1914. 10 16 8 103 186 204 11 29 23 5 7 1 2 9 14 3 10 14 21 36 40 54 4 5 4 18 L'f 21 337 1915. 358 NUMBER OF WORKPEOPLE DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY AFFECTED BY DISPUTES. Grroup of Industries. Building. . . '. Mining and quarrpng Metal trades, engineering, etc Wood, sawmill, timber, etc Clothing trades .... Food, drink, etc., manufacture and distribution. Printing and paper trades Other manufacturing Transport tirades Agriculture, etc , Other Total 1913. 232 33,537 585 105 483 1,263 8 2,731 9,049 515 1,775 50,283 1914. 4,321 48,785 8,039 556 54 2,670 163 1,535 3,256 359 1,311 71,049 1915. 301 54,315 3,016 620 566 3,'756 ' 7,m 8,550 213 2,733 81,292 NUMBER OP WORKING DAYS LOST THROUGH DISPUTES. Croup of Industries. Building Mining and quarrying Metal trades, engineering, etc Wood, sawmill, timber, etc Clothing trades Food, drink, etc., manufacture and distribution. Printing and paper trades Other manufacturing Transport trades. , Agriculture, etc .'. Other Total. 1913. 2,303 383,335 14,845 1,712 2,352 35,070 448 21,613 110,115 840 50,895 623,628 1914. 140,881 698,725 118,679 3,086 25 48,972 2,148 13,668 55,705 6,942 6,564 1,090,395 1915. 801 357,757 35,983 14,382 8,742 31,312 38,950 60,985 1,611 32,702 583,225 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1801-1916 117 Table XV.— Industrial Disputes in the Commonwealth of Australia — Concluded. CAUSES OF DISPUTES AND NUMBER OP WORKPEOPLE DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY AFFECTED. Cause or Object. 1913. 1914. 19:15. Wages- For increase .' Against decrease : Other 8,633 563 7,163 7,362 634 15,243 18,783 1,113 11,990 16,356 23,139 31,886 Hours of Labour — 460 1,819 220 3,237 896 Other 2,643 2,279 3,457 3,539 GnxploymeDt of particular classes or persons 11,370 10,785 6,788 2,705 14,863 17,053 7,400 5,137 13,844 16,114 7,612 8,297 l^ade unionism Other Grand total 50,283 71,049 81,292 RESULTS OF DISPUTES BY PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL NUMBER OP WOREa>EOPLB DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY AFFECTED. Result. 1913. 1914. 1915. In favour of workpeople In favour of employers Compromised Indefinite Total ' 1911 and 1912 not available. p.o. 21-71 24-28 49-37 4-64 100 p.c. 2»-87 25-68 42-78 1-67 100 p.c. » 54-30 18-85 18-28 8-57 100 118 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table XVI.— Industrial Disputes in. Austria, 1911— 1914> NUMBER OP DISPUTES. Industry or Occupation. 1911. 1912. 191d. 1914. Mining 72 67 . 57 28 iStone, earth, clay and glass 56 86 51 31 Metal working. 79 83 46 24 Machinery, etc 48 64 2S( 19 Woodworking and rubber 63 77 47 15 Textile 72 71 30 33 Clothing 75 , 72 42 24 Foodstufts 36 33 17 19 Building Trades 121 l.SO ■ 65 42 Other Industries 84 68 54 25 Total 706 761 438 260 Total Lockouts 22 40 23 18 Grand Total 728 801 461 278 NUMBER OF WORKPEOPLE AFFECTED BY DISPUTES. Industry or Occupation. Mining Stone, earth, clay and glass. Metal working Machinery etc Woodworking and rubber. . Textile Clothing Foodstuffs Building Trades Other Industries Total Total Lockouts Grand Total 1911. 20,001 4,176 5,189 2,853 4,061 37,126 24,871 2,507 14,639 6,578 122,001 6,373 128,374 1912. 64,003 7,324- 6,240 7,311 3,793 20,497 6,495 1,398 8,430 6,462 120,953 24,295 145,248 1913. 16,111 2,532 4,801 1,617 2,528 2,084 1,768 378 5,023 3,072 39,814 22,258 62,072 NUMBER OP WORKING DAYS L.OST THROUGH DISPUTES. Industry or Occupation. Mining Stone, earth, clay and glass Metal working. Machinery, etc Woodworking a,nd rubber. . Textile Clothing Foodstuffs Building Trades Other Industries Total Strikes Total Lockouts Grand Total 1011. 89,506 39,861 120,420 48,622 64,637 755,870 344,663 17,702 175,042 44,964 1,701,277 112,219 1,813,496 1912. 318,623 192,111 126,317 326,879 119,888 459,618 81,465 12,423 107,286 148,628 1,862,027 471,267 2,333,294 1913. 47,354 . 61,167 94,432 23,576 34,764 21,812 2,138 1,473 71,465 51,172 409,353 1,071,916 1,481,269 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 Table XVI. — Industrial Disputes in Austria, 1911-1914 — Concluded. 119 DISPUTES BY CAUSES OR OBJECTS. \ Cause or Object . ' 1911. 1912. ' 1913. 1914. 443 113 93 59 48 77 488 117 100 62 55 77 261 47 60 49 '66 203 Hours DismisBals Working arirangements Employment of particular classes or persons . Other • 54 57 RESULTS OF DISPUTES BY PERCENTAGES OP THE TOTAL NUMBER IN BACH YEAR. Results. 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914. P.O. 180 29-2 52-8 P.O. 19-7 31 1 49-2 P.O. 20 360 440 p.c. 15-5 347 Oomproinise 498 100 100 100 100 ^ 1915 not available. ^ In disputes which have more than one cause, each cause is counted , 120 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table XVII.— Industrial Disputes in Belgium, 1911-1914 NUMBER OF DISPUTES. Industry. 1911. 1912. , 1913. 1914. > Building Mining and quarrying Mfctal trades '. 10 32 17 48 1 8" 15 8 14 3 6 11 38 29 52 1 6 4 22 8 7 8 19 ■ 1 11 18 29 52 2 1 6 10 10 4 12 12 19 12 9 Textile trades : 15 7 Transport trades 3 Printing and paper trades Wood-working and furnishing trades ... Chemical, glass and pottery trades 2 3 2 Food and tobacco trsides 2 12 Total 162 206 167 86 NUMBER OP "WORKPEOPLE DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY DISPUTES. Industry. Building Mining and quarrying Metal trades Textile trades Clothing trades Transport trades ,.. Printing and paper trades Wood-working and furnishing trades . Chemical, glass and pottery trades . . . Food and tobacco trades Leather trades Other trades Number of trades combined Total. 1911. 938 34,417 3,702, 9,089 24 1.151 1,198 2,528 669 G4 3,423 57,203 1912. 942 38,559' 5,140 5,856 120 3,133 413 3,764 444 190 377 2,334 2,500 63,772 1913. 746 3,912 3,227 10,158 230 196 202 2,334 821 86 1,449 391 23;752 1814.1 1,392 3,356 2,064 2,327 563 1,070 85 802 325 18 140 497 12,639 CAUSES OF DISPUTES BT NUMBER OP WORKPEOPLE DIRECTLY AFFECTED. Cause or Object. 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914.1 Wages— For increase 8,550 67 3.794 23,435 375 26,511 11,502 1,153 661 2,626 975 Other 4,328 12,411 60,321 13,316 7,92S Hours of Labour— For decrease Other ~. 6,932 2,080 1,672 278 108 5,932 3,752 278 108 Employment of particular claases or persons! ^^orking arrangements V 3,341 26,192 7,140 2,187 4,058 1,393 440 3;808 3,111 1,669 1,887 3,561 1,965 1,576 46 Other .~ ■ 1,017 G rand total 57,203 63,772 23,752 12,639 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 121 Table XVII. — Industrial Disputes in Bfelgium, 1911-1914 — Concluded. RESULTS OF DISPUTES BY PERCENTAGE OP TOTAL NUMBER OF -WORKPEOPLE DIRECTL-y AFFECTED. Result. 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914.1' P.O. 6-44 16-78 73-68 3-10" P.O. 42-68 22-30 33-73 1.39 ' P.O. 11 -9S 53-22 34-27 -55 P.O. 10-24 In favour of employers Compromised ... , Indefinite '. ,. 33-34 20-11 36-31 lOO- 100- 100- 100- ' 1914 available forfirst five months only; 1916 not available. 122 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table XVIII.— Industrial Disputes in France, 1911-1915. , NUMBER OF DISPUTES. Group of Industries. BuUdini; trades A^culture and fishing Mining and quarrying -. Metal trades , , Textile trades (properly so called) . , . (1) Transport and maintenance Other trades Total 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914. 1915. 468 306 267 189 6 64 50 69 '• 63 6 71 63 62 1 174 187 138 73 1 203 137 181 117 25 26 36 40 20 4 168 117 113 79 21 297 221 213 131 35 1,471 1,116 1,073 672 98 NUMBER OP WORKPEOPLiE AFFECTED BY DISPUTES. Group of Industries. 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914. 1915, Building trades ^ 9.3,619 13,519 13,560 19,415 18,956 2,073 39,176 30,328 31,460 8,364 137,602 22,486 12,398 1,926 33,.S59 20,043 25,543 7,464 87,946 23,336 17,209 3,296 32,971 22,685 21,141 1 78,422 16,009 15,679 1,351 6,934 21,030 1,238 Agriculture and fishing IMining and quarrying 618 Metal trades ^ 18 Textile trades properly so called) . . 4,403 249 Transport and maintenance 9,361 2,663 Total , 230,646 267,627 220,448 160,566 18,650 CAUSES OF DISPUTES AND NUMBER OP WORKPEOPLE AFFECTED IN EACH TEAR. Causes or Object. 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914. 1916. Wages— For increase 162,253 4,309 30,240 . 70,067 38,568 22,213 57,278 88,553 2,168 20,172 144,436 37,445 37,406 164,084 77,418 3,354 7,612 32,218 25,111 102,632 33,362 63,638 9,608 6,689 31,621 18,152 9,925 71,919 7,281 438 Oflier Hours of labour Employment of particular classes or persons 190 552 859 087 Other 454 Total 384,928 494,264 281,707 211,552 10,361 RESULTS OF DISPUTES BY PERCENTAGES OF TOTAL NUMBER OP WORK- PEOPLE DIRECTLY AFFECTED IN BACH TEAR. Results. 191). 1912. 1913. 1914. 1915. in favour of_^workpeople In favour of employers p.c. 9-02 .S6-35 54-63 P,c. 6-78 66-64 26-68 p.c. 39-31 30-99 29-70 p.c. 8-16 56-44 35-40 p.c. 21-7 28-6 Oompromise 49-8 Total 100 100 100 100 100 (1) So designated' in the source. This group comprises occupations not usually included under ' Textile Trades " such as garment making, hat making, upholstery, etc. STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 Table XIX. — Industrial Disputes in Germany, 1911-1915. NUMBER OF DISPUTES. 123 Industry or Occupation. 1911. 1912. 1913. * 1914. Building , Woodworking Engineering and machinery Metal working Stones and earths Clothing / Food and Tobacco, etc , preparation. Textiles. Transportation Leather Mining Paper Chemicals Con.merce Printing and allied trades Soaps, oils, varnishes, etc Hotels, restaurants, etc .\ Gardening : Music, theatres, etc Industrial arts Fishing and forestry Total strikes. . . Total lockouts'. Grand total . . . 587 319 299 232 214 144 174 87 132 59 71 31 30 87 19 23 19 23 5 7 4 2,666 232 2,798 569 270 246 187 152 134 177 117 134 43 27 82 30 15 39 14 5 2,510 2,834 691 199 234 146 152 95 96 70 114 45 91 23 20 81 I 13 22 21 1 4 2 2,127 337 2,464 386 114 177 120 65 44 20 57 29 16 16 14 57 1,115 108 1,223 NUMBER OF WORKPEOPLE DIRBCTL.r AFFECTED BY DISPUTES. Industry or Occupation. 1911. 1912. 1913. 45,084 8,299 61,352 8,480 8,309 8,485 5,632 10, 4B5 9,859 1,789 75,423 1,901 1,073 5,228 383 1,207 181 592 2 62 410 1914. 1915. Building . 29,642 18,189 34,669 31,722 12,057 29, 148 9,434 10,993 9,283 3,646 15,500 2,675 4,454 2,757 1,141 1,336 181 611 44 155 172 29,823 11,030 34,663 19,246 9,656 13,972 10,323 12,266 10, 203 1,448 238,835 3,285 1,377 4,335 4,062 580 641 475 67 17,504 4,768 1 10,661 6,186 2,224 1,629 1,692 7,861 1,040 1,773 1,056 400 1 1,902 1,506 Woodworking Engineering and Machinery Metalworkmg 216 f 2,125^ \ 192 260 Clothing Pood and Tobacco, etc., preparation Textiles Transportation Leather Mining . .... 35 810 331 173 51 5,327 Paper Chemicals Commerce .... 8 11 491 7 Soap, oils, varnishes, etc Hotels, restaurants, etc Gardening 43 16 27 37 217,809 138,354 406,314 74,780 254,206 56,842 5S,(i96 36,458 11,639 Total lockouts 1 ■ 1,227 Grand total 356, 163 481,094 311,048 95,154 12,866 'Classification of lockouts by industries not available. 124 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR^ CANADA Table XIX. — Industrial Disputes in Germany, 1&11-15 — Concluded. DISPUTES BY CAUSES OR OBJECTS. Cause or Object.' 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914.2 1915V Wages i,869 ' 132 398 ■2,609' 123 852 1,737' 129 825 884 21 Against reduction Other 230 83 11 657 60 1,557 792 420 1,573 570 87 1,435 10 other ... Other causes 594 ' 7 41 RESULTS OF DISPUTES BY PEROBNTAGBS OF THE TOTAIj NUMBER IN EACH TEAR. Result. 1911. 1912. 1913. 1914. 1915.' In favour of workpeople .' In favour of employers p.c. 20-4 47-7 ?20 p.c. 181 391 42-8 p.c. 16-2 35-9 47-9 p.c. 9-0 54- 1 36-4 p.c. 120 36-3 517 100 100 100 100 100 'In a dispute having more than one cause, each cause is counted. ^Strikes only. ^Causes of lockouts : Introduction of graded wages and continuance of overtime work ; reduction of wages in force at time of lockout ; refusal to grant demands of workers ; change of collective agreement ; not separately reported. STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 Tablk XX. — ^Industrial Disputes in Holland 1911-1915. NUMBER OF DISPUTES. 125 Industry or Occupation. 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 Agriculture and fishing Jfining. Pottery Diamonds and other precious stones Printing Building trades, Roadways Commerce and transport Clothing Textiles , 'Metal worlang, etc Food products . ' Other Total.. Total Lookouts Grand total 11 10 11 68 40 8 5 10 20 205 12 217 2 17 4 10 71 38 11 ,29 18 260 18 278 45 3 31 14 17 106 58 13 17 31 40 25 4U0 27 427 18 5 15 6 14 fi9 40 9 7 26 19 22 250 21 271 18 10 10 4 8 73 67 8 10 23 14 13 258 10 NUMBER OP WORKPEOPLE AFFECTED BY DISPUTES. Industry or Occupation. 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 Agriculture and fishing Mining. Pottery Diamonds and other precious stones . Printing Building trades, Roadways Commerce and transport Clothing Textiles 1 Metal working, etc Food products Other Total Total Lockouts Grand total . 275 4,974 391 727 435 2,157 8,611 206 188 269 . 10 1 119 1914. 71 4 5 J) 6 14 115 1915. 39 4 12 80 RESULTS OF DISPUTES BY PERCENTAGES OP THE TOTAL, NUMBER IN EACHTTEAR. Result. 1911. ' p.c. 22 45 33 1912. 1913. 19l4. 1915. In favour of workpeople, . . p.c. 22 42 36 P.O. 30 24 38 8 p.c. 22 29 41 8 p.c, 34 In favour of employers Compromise Indefinite. . . -. ... 21 36 9 100 100 100 100 100 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, 1901-1916 133 Table XXlV.^-JudusU-ial Disputes in the United Kingdom 1911-1915. NUMBER OP DISPUTES. Groups of Industries. 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 27 179 265 133 46 99 164 58 155 234 136 68 73 133 198 192 392 243 75 123 273 1' 1,497 177 177 235 97 48 58 207 66 Mining and quarrying. . Metal, tingineering and shipbuilding. . . Textile 85 191 - 69 40 86 Miscellaneous and employees of local authorities General dispute (one or more trades). . . . 169 857 Total 903 999 706 'This relates to the dispute at Dublin, which began in August, 1913, and endeu in B'ebruary, 1914 affecting a large number of different trades. NUMBER OF WORKPEOPLE AFFECTED BY DISPUTES. Groups of Industries. 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 Building Mining and quarrying Metal, engineering and shipbuilding . . . Textile.; Clothing Transport Miscellaneous, and employees of local authorities General dispute (one or more trades) .... 2,789 140,808 93,783 221,433 9,810 448,618 44, 739 5,634 ,106,736 82,885 56, 208 31,069 155,300 2'S, 449 40,002 214,078 152,689 93, 510 15, 227 86,225 67,194 20,000' 37,670 272, 680 50,883 22, 248 4,397 13,546 47, 105 Total . 961,980 1,463,281 688,925 448,529 15,935 298, 138 46,710 33,107 5,525 26,600 26,556 452, 571 'Dublin dispute. NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS LOST THROUGH DISPUTES.! Groups of Industries. Building , Mining and quarrying Metal, engineering and shipbuilding. . . . Textile Clothing Transport Miscellaneous and employees of local authorities ^ General disputes (one or more trades). , . Total . 1911 74,962 4,101,276 1,321,915 1,434,068 94,447 2,729,633 563,290 10,319,691 1912 106, 638 ,593,845 ,369,328 ,698,376 601,438 ,985,165 559,885 40,914,675 1913 823,829 1,655,584 2,987,695 2,028,200 173,910 1,245,092 1,016,422 n, 700, 000 11,630,732 1914 ,199,426 ,781,083 ,304,010 765,088 61,529 93, 128 707,073 10,111,337 1915 135, 204 ,656,449 365,708 373, 451 27,629 177,522 302, 171 3,0.38,134 'This is the aggregate duration of the disputes which began in the years 1911-15, respectively, and is computed on the basis of the totfil number involved directly and indirectly. ^The aggregate duration in 1914 of the general dispute at Dublin (200,000) is included in the total but not in the separate groups of trades. 134 DEPARTMENT OF IjABOUR^ CANADA Table XXIV. — Industrial Disputes in the DISPUTES BY CAUSESS . Year. Number of disputes beginning in each year, the results of which were : Total Principal Cause or Object. il "o aS P a. M Compromised or partially successful. S a number of disputes beginning in each year. Wages 1911 1912 1913 1914 2 1915 2 1911 1912 1913 1914 2 1915 2 1911 1912 1913 1914 2 1915 2 1911 1912 1913 1914 2 1915 2 1911 1912 1913 1914 2 1915 2 1911 1912 1913 1914 2 1915 2 1911 1912 1913 1914 > X915> 125 132 213 157 142 229 293 263 540 1 2 576 539 982 - 8 6 17 Hours of labour 11 7 14 12 14 18 31 27 49 42 44 10] Employment of particular classes of persons . . . 54 54 67 44 50 68 1 140 149 236 ■ 14 18 21 26 16 22 Working arrangements,— rules and discipline (otlier than above.) 25 16 30 1 66 50 73 / 37 28 68 31 27 40 Trade Unionism 11 15 26 • 79 70 133 1 5 5 SympiithetiodiBputes 7 9 5 2 1 2 10 15 12 / 2 3 I 3 f> Miscellaneous 2 4 1 7 12 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS IN CANADA, lflOl-1916 United Kingdom, 1911-1915 — Continued. AND RESULTS. 135 Number of employees directly involved in disputes, the results of which were : Total directly nvolved . Total indirect- ly involved Aggregate duration in working days of all disputes in progress in each year, the results of which were : ' Total O V It ►3 III 1 1-^ ■si a H 1 = -- ■ '3 aggregate duration in working days. ' . ■ 32,608 875, 4s9 40,616 41,363 44,973 38,028 309, 208 99,403 203,902 * 36 555 383,215 1,020,480 283,146 86,913 196,380 100, 100 404, 17S 5.367 31,121,311 1,600 932,929 14, 19^ 870,176 29,464 553,907 n,0S6 1,145,461 7,144 3,748,244 2,298,552 2,614,469 91,554 5,280,904 64,466 3,500 202,963 17,340 80,000 2b',oob 5,026,097 2,536,336 ' 34,307,027 m,iso 7,359,294 105,802 7,621 «, 796 3,210 13,161 8,961 13,688 \ 1,212 751 2,957 4,328 1,414 7,521 3,490 6,363 8,116 6,041 4,387 42,628 g,100 40,544 12,580 56i84] 214,552 112,120 05,785 5,600 261,137 129, 087 165,254 7,700 17,265 10,094 17,959 5,879 18,211 19,752 10,086 6,714 15,006 16,674 8,860 18,956 1,200 ■ 32,639 34,985 53,714 37,098 98,806 355,095 254,497 3,000 50, 113 23, Z58 122,914 1,140 112,704 159,862 20,000 202, 256 16,694 49,200 404,299 3,000 357,981 43,158 680,265 17, 834 99,633 100,189 13,110 75,371 664 3,441 7,932 ■6,669 8,112 22,352 8,200 56,186 11,784 5,290 270 68,009 42,068 20,159 15,661 4,598 6,708 21,319 138,1^8 23,727 19,010 553. 491 128,493 67,609 6,900 860 075,303 138,128 252,409 13,110 161,990 7,564 11,538 15,444 88,352 7,462 97, 375 20,040 308,588 8,105 12,078 327,588 120,924 120,470 4,505 10,903 34,969 54,262 8,760 66,005 SB6 735,308 6,750 62,826 13,000 2,748,343 7,100 1,865,826 380 1,060,614 109,606 2,514,460 268, 194 168 1,177,701 21,760 2,923,954 2,522,126 2,869,328 7,298 27 257 767 5,504 3,.684 14,496 900 18 81 6,431 3,959 15,343 2,342 . 1,580 1,228 27 2,695 7,677 69,498 127,590 190,050 2,500 600 740 72,025 130, 885 198, 467 61 214 4,657 ""i,398 1,961 61 1,699 9,517 700 1,347 3,808 1,063 5,830 3,805 2,796 30,780 3,805 87 2,899 36,90€ 13,320 ■40,758 49, 930 136 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table XXIV. — Industrial Disputes in the DISPUTES BY CAUSES Year. Number of disputes beginning in each year, the results of which were: Total Principal Cause or Object. °s ;« 1— 1 287 258 382 Compromised or partially successful. 1 "a C t-H number of disputes beginning in each year. Grand total 1911 1912 1913 1914 2 1915 2 227 235 428 387 361 687 2 3 903 857 1,497 ' 990 927 1,435 6 '3,257 ' The aggregate duration of disputes which began in the years 1911-1.5, respectively is printed in roman italics. 2 Not available. STRIKES ANi) LOCKOUTS iN CANADA, 1901-1916 137 United Kingdom, 1911-1915 — Concluded. AND RESULTS— OowcZMded. Number of employees directly Aggregate duration in working days of involved in disputes, the results of all disputes m progress in each year. vfhioh were: the results of which were:' ■ Total aggregate duratibn in working III s Total directly Total indirect- ly u-i in c C 1 = ^ i °'S, g^. S =3 * "5 involved . involved o^ 53. gisi 'S days. ii 1^ F^ •g 1 • &»§ =§ "S w 1— I M M M 54,705 76,916 699, 177 306 831,104 130,876 522, 925 152,256 1,400,977 45,464 5,692,105 2,298,552 4,360 202, 95S 7, 620, 367 2,699,224 918,171 176,726 136, 364 1,755 1,233,016 230, 265 31,317,994 2,166 3,595,517 OS, 494 3,162,050 2,626,914 66,540 38,142,101 2,772,574 162,012 108,547 245,478 516,037 172,888 2,098,477 2S,04S1 3,487,243 9,S2H 5,898,814 ■ 9S,828 »,'oo& 11,484,534 148, 198 362, 189 1,081,019 2,580,157 534,029 1,134,888 2,061 33,939,396 8,483,737 14,752,969 70,900 57,247,002 177,463 118,286 5,019,294 302, 95S 5,619,996 type. The aggregate duration of disputes which began before the years 1911-15, respectively is printed in 28163—10 138 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CANADA Table XXV.— Indiis'tidal Disputes in tbe United States 1914-1915. NUMBER OP DISPUTES. Group of Industries. Building ': Mining and quarrying (including stone-cutting). Metal trades Textile tr».des Clothing trades Transport trades Printing and paper trades Timber, wood- working and furnishing trades. . . Chemical, glass and pottery trades Food, drink and tobacco trades '. Leather trades Other trades Total. 1914. 1,0802 191.5. 275 231 67 86 129 K21 64 84 78 128 86 105 . 28 26 58 34 23 46 87 108 27 19 IBS 217 1,405 NUMBER OF DISPUTES BY CAUSES. Cause or Object. 1914. ■ 1915. Wages— 192 92 10 298 Against decrease 100 Oflier 11 Total7 294 409 48 72 63 103 109 37 , 82 ' 808 272 81 General conditions 39 Recognition of union ., W^ages, hours, conditions and recognition of union 52 226 Other trade union questions W^orking agreement . . , r62 Other 189 Total '. 1,158 247 Grand total 1,080'' 1,405 RESULTS OP DISPUTES BY PERCENTAGES 'OP THE TOTAL NUMBER. Kesnlt. In favour of workpeople. In favour of employers Compromised Employees returned, pending arbitration.. Fending Not reported . 1914. 18-33 3-43 7-50 1-85 31 11 68-89 100 1915. 12-88 10-25 21-57 2-13 12-17 6900 41 -00 100 1 1911, 1912 and 1913 not available. 2 The April 1916 Review of the United States Bureau of Labour Statistics states that during 1914 there were 1,204 disputes, but no classification is (riven of the additional 124 disputes. DATE DUE . J GAVLORD t. CRINTEOINU.S.A. r^'^'ff ; ,'V-»v