5; ^'3V. BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF 1891 .ff.2^26'yM 3-a\mio.'^.: PR5263.C77S9l"^ro""'^"'"^ ^'u^es in Ruskin; some The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924013542661 STUDIES IN RUSKIN SOME ASPECTS WORK AND TEACHING OF JOHN RUSKIN, WITH REPRODUCTIONS OF DRAIVINGS BY MR. RUSKIN IN THE RUSKIN DRAjyiNG SCHOOL, OA'FORD. BUST BY SIR J. E. BOEHM. R.A. (In the Kuskin Drawing School, Oxford). STUDIES IN RUSKIN: SOME ASPECTS WORK AND TEACHING OF JOHN RUSKIN. EDWARD T. COOK, M.A., AUTHOR OF ' A POPULAR HANDBOOK TO THE NATIONAL GALLERY.' WITH REPRODUCTIONS OF DRAWINGS BY MR. RUSKIN IN THE RUSKIN DRAWING SCHOOL, OXFORD. GEORGE ALLEN, SUNNYSIDE, ORPINGTON, AND BELL YARD, TEMPLE BAR, LONDON. 1890. {All rights reserved.'] PRINTED BY HAZELL, WATSON, AND VINEY, LD., LONDON AND AYLESBURY. PREFACE. The object of the First Part of this Httle book is not, it will be seen, critical or controversial, but expository. My desire has been to discuss not how, but what, Ruskin has written. For several reasons, such definition seemed to me a thing worth attempting at this time. Mr. Ruskin has of late years written so voluminously, and on subjects so multifarious, that the accidental and the temporary have been like to overlay what is essential and permanent in his teaching. His writings open a vista into a great forest, but there has been some danger of not seeing the forest for the trees. This danger, which always exists when an author spreads himself over a large area, has probably been increased by the increasing popularity of Mr. Ruskin's PREFACE. works, and by the cult which has grown up around his personaHty. The most ardent are not always the most discriminating of readers. "The fact is," Mr. Ruskin somewhere says, " that I have always had three different ways of writing — one, with the single view of making myself understood, in which I necessarily omit a great deal of what comes into my head ; another, in which I say what I think ought to be said ; and my third way of writing is to say all that comes into my head, for my own pleasure." Amongst the things that come most freely into Mr. Ruskin's head, and that give him most pleasure, are somewhat wilful paradoxes, uttered often, it would seem, with the single view of making himself misun- derstood. On the other hand, what sel- dom comes into Mr. Ruskin's head, or what, if it does come, is generally dismissed as giving him no pleasure, is the desirability of saving clauses and qualifying statements. The consequence is that nothing is easier for a captious critic than to convict Mr. Ruskin of inconsistencies, and for a superficial reader than to fall into bewilderment. It has seemed PREFACE. Vll to me, therefore, that I might be doing a real service, in these days of Ruskin Societies and Ruskin Reading Guilds, by attempting to set forth what appeared to me to be the main and essential drift of his teaching. The pages devoted to this object were originally written to form part of a series of articles on " Modern Gospels," contributed by different hands to a daily periodical. Having decided to republish the " Gospel according to Ruskin," I thought it might be well to carry the design of the " Gospel " chapters a step farther, by appending some account of Mr. Ruskin's Acts. Mr. Ruskin, like his master, Carlyle, has loudly proclaimed him- self a Moral Teacher, and in the case of moral teachers one has a right to inquire how far they have practised what they preach. I have not, however, attempted any estimate of Mr. Ruskin's life and character, a task for which the time has happily not arrived. My object has only been to show such aspects of Mr. Ruskin's public work as are in themselves of pubHc interest, and inci- dentally throw light on his teaching. The Vlll PREFACE. best claim, indeed, to honour consists, in Mr. Ruskin's case, as in that of all great teachers, not so much in what he has himself done, as in what he has enabled others to think, and feel, and do. The highest tribute to Mr. Rus- kin's Gospel is to be found in the thoughts he has inspired and in the characters he has helped to mould. Nevertheless, many of Mr. Ruskin's own schemes have in themselves a positive value in their generation. They may serve as sign-posts, pointing the way to social progress, and they have shown how practical realization may be given to what the late Prince Leopold truly and eloquently described as the last and greatest precept in Mr. Ruskin's Gospel — the precept, namely, that "the highest wisdom and the highest treasure need not be costly or exclusive ; that the greatness of a nation must be measured, not alone by its wealth and ap- parent power, but by the degree in which its people have learned together, in the great world of books, of art, and of nature, pure and enno- bling joys." December T,lst, iB8g. CONTENTS. PART I. ■' THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO RUSKIN." CHAPTER I. PRINCIPLES OF ART CHAPTER II. APPLICATIONS TO LIFE .... . . ; PART II. SOME ASPECTS OF MR. RUSKIN'S WORK. CHAPTER I. MR. RUSKIN AND OXFORD ...... 38 X CONTENTS. CHAPTER II. PAGE THE RUSKIN DRAWING SCHOOL . . . . .62 CHAPTER III. MR. RUSKIN AND THE WORKING MEN's COLLEGE . . 122 CHAPTER IV. MR. RUSKIN's "may QUEENS " .... 12? CHAPTER V. THE ST. George's guild {with some account of the " Ruskin Museum" at Sheffield) . . . .140 CHAPTER VI. SOME industrial EXPERIMENTS . . l6l § I. The Langdale Linen Industry . . . 164 § 2. " St. George's " Cloth . . . 173 § 3. "George Thomson & Co." . . . 17S CHAPTER VII. MR. RUSKIN AND THE BOOKSELLERS .... 184 APPENDICES. NOTES ON MR. RUSKIN'S OXFORD LECTURES. I. " readings in ' MODERN PAINTERS ' " . . . 2O5 CONTENTS. II. " THE PLEASURES OF ENGLAND " III. A LECTURE ON PATIENCE . IV. " BIRDS, AND HOW TO PAINT THEM ' V. A LECTURE ON LANDSCAPE 211 264 272 283 REPRODUCTIONS OF DRAWINGS BY MR. RUSKIN. I. MARKET PLACE, ABBEVILLE . . . 3OO II. PINE FOREST, MONT CENIS 302 III. LUCERNE 304 IV. OLD BRIDGE AT LUCERNE . , . 306 V. FRIBOURG, SWITZERLAND 308 VI. GLACIER DES BOSSONS, CHAMONIX . . 3 10 VII. GRAND CANAL, VENICE . . . 312 VIII. CASTLE OF HAPSEURG 3I4 IX. KINGFISHER . . . . . . . 3'^ A. PLANE LEAVES . . . . -3'^ XI. SAN MICHELE, LUCCA 320 XII. AGRIMONY LEAVES ..... • 3^^ XIII. GLEN FINLAS . . 324 325 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. I. John Ruskin. From a bust by Sir J. E. Boehm, R.A. . . . Frontispiece II. The Ruskin Drawing School : Interior To face page 73 III. The May Queen's Gold Cross. After a 1 by Arthur Severn . To face page 129 IV. The May Queen's Procession. From a drawing by Edith Capper .... Page 132 V. The St. George's Museum, Walkley : Ex- terior .... To face page 146 VI. The St. George's Museum, Walkley : In- terior .... To face page 148 VII. The Ruskin Museum, Meersbrook Park : Ex- terior . . . To face page 158 XIV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. VIII. The "Bishop's House," Meepsbrook Park To face page 159 IX. The Ruskin Museum, Meepsbrook Park : In- terior of Picture-gallery To face page 160 X. Peasant-woman Spinning. From a drawing by Edith Capper . . . Page 1 66 XI. "St. Martin's,'' Langdale. Front a drawing by Edith Capper Page 168 XII. "Old John," the Weaver. From a drawing by Edith Capper . Page 171 XIII. St. George's Mill, Laxey, Isle of Man (with fac-simile of Mr. Ruskin's Inscription) To face page 175 NOTE. Several chapters in this boolc originally appeared in the Pall Mall Gazelle. To the proprietors of that journal I am indebted for kind permission to reprint them here. For the chapter on "The Langdale Linen Industry" I am indebted to my friend Mr. Albert Fleming. The Illustrations of the Walkley Museum, Meersbrook Park, etc., are from photographs kindly taken for me by Mr. B. Carr and" Mr. C. Bradshaw, under the supervision of Mr. William White, the Curator of the Ruskin Museum. For permission to engrave Sir J. E. Boehm's bust of Mr. Ruskin and the Interior of the Ruskin Drawing School I am indebted to Mr. A. Macdonald, the Master of the School. Permission to reproduce a selection from Mr. Ruskin's Drawings in the Ruskin Drawing School has been kindly accorded to me by the Curators of the University Galleries, and by Mr. Macdonald, the Master of the School. To Mr. Macdonald I am greatly indebted for much help in this matter, as well as for other kind offices. PART I. "THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO H US KIN." CHAPTER I. PRINCIPLES OF ART. Is there a Gospel according to Ruskin at all ? is there a ^ ° ;■ Ruskin- The very genius of Mr. Ruskin as a writer '^^^j'^"^- makes the question necessary. Darwin * was no orator as Mr. Ruskin is. There was no gla- mour of fine writing, no film of ingenious rhe- toric, to lend factitious importance or interest to the " Origin of Species." Darwin was the deliverer of a gospel, or he was nothing. But Mr. Ruskin may be a giant of prose writing, and yet have no gospel to deliver. All is not * The preceding article in the series of which this paper formed part was on "The Gospel according to Darwin." I 2 " THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO RUSKIN." gold in thought that glisters in words. It is with fine words as Mr. Ruskin says of painted drapery, " As long as they are in their due service and subjection — while their folds are formed by the motion of men, and their lustre adorns the nobleness of men — so long the lustre and folds are lovely. But cast them from the human hmbs — golden circlet and silken tissue are withered; the dead leaves of autumn are more precious than they.'' How, then, is it with the golden circlets of Mr. Ruskin's periods and the silken tissues of his phrases ? He has shown us a new instrument of expression, but has he opened any new field of thought or touched any fresh spring of action ? Is it possible to speak of a "Gospel according to Ruskin" in anything approaching the same sense as that in which we speak of a " Gospel according to Darwin " ? Are there Ruskinians as well as Darwinians ? Mr. Ruskin's own answer to the question, when put in that form, is a decided negative. Many men, he says, have " hope of being remembered as the discoverers of some important truth, or the founders of some exclusive system called after their own names. But I have never applied PRINCIPLES OF ART. 3 myself to discover anything, being content to praise what had already been discovered ; so that no true disciple of mine will ever be a Ruskinian." But now hear some other opinions. " Do you look out," wrote George Eliot to her friend Miss Sarah Hennell, " for Ruskin's books whenever they appear ? . . . I venerate him as one of the great teachers of the age. . . . He teaches with the inspiration of a Hebrew prophet." " Do you read Ruskin's ' Fors Cla- vigera ' ? " Carlyle asked of Emerson. " If you don't, do, I advise you. Also . . . whatever else he is now writing. There is nothing going on among us as notable to me." These estimates of Mr. Ruskin himself on An oHGos- pel with the one side, and of his admirers on the other, "atTonff''' are not contradictory. The Gospel according to Ruskin is one of glad tidings, but not of " news." What George Eliot admired was his teaching of " Truth, Sincerity, and Nobleness." This is an " old, old story." But every age requires the old story to be applied to its new interests and its new temptations. The great- ness of Mr. Ruskin depends on the degree in which he has met this twofold need. He took the Gospel of Truth, Sincerity, and Nobleness 4 " THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO RUSKIN." as he had learned it from Carlyle, and applied it to a new sphere untouched by Carlyle and of increasing importance in this time. And secondly, founding his Gospel of Art upon Principles of Life, he re-applied that Gospel in its turn to counteract the besetting materialism and commercialism of his age. In this chapter an attempt will be made to set out, as far as possible in the preacher's own words, the Ruskinian Gospel of Art; whilst in a second chapter some of its leading applications to poli- tical and social questions will be considered. The origin It has been said of Carlyle, by one of his touched" latest biographers, that his taste in art was with praise, ^^^j^ „ ^.j^^^ ^^ ^^^ Annandalc peasant." Then the Annandale peasant must have a great fac- ulty, as indeed the natural man often does have, for going to the root of the matter. " In all true Works of Art," says Carlyle in " Sartor," " if thou know a Work of Art from a Daub of Artifice, wilt thou discern Eternity looking through Time ; the Godlike rendered visible." "Art in all times," he says, in "Shooting Niagara," "is a higher synonym for God Al- mighty's Facts, — which come to us direct from Heaven, but in so abstruse a condition, PRINCIPLES OF ART. 5 and cannot be read at all till the better intellect interpret them. All real Art is definable as Fact, or say as the disimprisoned Soul of Fact." In these two passages (the latter of which, however, was of course long subsequent to "Modern Painters") is contained the germ of all Mr. Ruskin's Gospel of Art. What is Art ? From what instinct in man does it spring ? To what faculties does it appeal ? By what rules is it to be judged ? What purpose does it serve ? The Ruskinian Gospel answers these fundamental questions with no uncertain sound. " The art of man," such is the jBrst article of faith as defined in " The Laws of Fesole," "is the expression of his rational and disciplined delight in the forms and laws of the creation of which he forms a part." Mr. Ruskin's theory of the origin of Art is thus the old theory of imitation, with a " rider : " Art arises out of imitation, but of imitation touched with delight. Both are necessary. Thus " a lamb at play, rejoicing in its own life only, is not an artist." But the child who, looking at the lamb and liking it, tries to imitate it on his slate, is an artist. This is the theory which all Mr. Ruskin's historical studies in THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO RUSKIN. The facul- ties to which Art appeals : "ideas of imitation and of power." Art serve to illustrate. "All great Art is Praise." The perfection of the Art of the Greeks was the expression of their delight in God's noblest work — the disciplined beauty of the human body. The perfection of early Italian Art was its delight in " saints a-praising God." It is with architecture as with painting : those fair fronts of mouldering wall were filled with sculpture of the saints whom the cathedral builders worshipped and of the flowers they loved. Such being, on the Ruskinian theory, the origin of Art, it is easy to see to what faculties in man it appeals. " Like is known of like : " from delight in the forms and laws of God's creation Art comes ; to that delight it appeals. This is the central idea of the chief book of Ruskin's Gospel. " In the main aim and prin- ciple of ' Modern Painters,' " he says, " there is no variation from its first syllable to its last. It declares the perfectness and eternal beauty of the work of God, and tests all work of man by concurrence with or subjection to that." Thus, the greatest picture, he says, is that which conveys the greatest number of the greatest ideas. The ideas that can be received from Art PRINCIPLES OF ART. / are fivefold : ideas of power, ideas of imitation, ideas of truth, ideas of beauty, and ideas of relation (that is, everything productive of ex- pression, sentiment, and character). Of these five sets of ideas, the first two may be classed as one, and soon dismissed — not because they are unimportant, but because the recognition of their importance is included in every Gospel of Art that was ever sanely preached, and besides is felt by every one who ever looked at a picture. " How like it is ! " is always the first remark of the unsophisticated critic when he is confronted by a competent picture, and feels a perception of gentle surprise at seeing a piece of canvas covered with pigments looking like a field or a face. The idea of imitation is the first received from a picture ; the idea of power — the recognition, that is, of the painter's skill — is perhaps the last. In this aspect of pictures what artists are so The duty of ^ *^ choosing fond of saying — namely, that only artists have "ubjects. the right to criticize them — is true. In one sense it is only the chef of the Cafe Anglais who can " do justice " to a dinner at the Cafe Riche ; for it is only he who knows how much skill in composition and delicacy in handling 8 "the gospel according to Ruskm." are involved in producing the dinner But no. one has yet pretended that you have no right to discuss a good dinner unless you could yourself cook it — and why not ? Because the dinner itself is to be enjoyed, as well as the skill which produced it to be admired. And so it is with pictures : they must be like what they represent ; of course they must ; and a spectator may or may not know how difficult it is to attain even that, but the more he knows how difficult is the mastery, the more he will insist, if he be logical, upon the aim being worthy. According to Mr. Frith, Turner once said to Mr. Ruskin, " My dear sir, if you only knew how difficult it is to paint even a decent picture, you would not say the severe things you do of those who fail." As applied to Mr. Ruskin's criticism of technique, the remark may have been trenchant ; as applied to his criticism of subjects, it cuts precisely the other way. " The hfe so short," says Chaucer, " the craft so long to learne ; " then, for God's sake, do not waste your hard-won skill and scanty time in painting a boor instead of a gentleman, or an " impression " of a ballet-girl instead of a vision of angel choirs. PRINCIPLES OF ART. Q And thus we come to the other ideas which xruUi.""*^ pictures may convey — ideas of truth, of beauty, of relation. Ideas of truth need not detain us. It is a chapter of the Gospel which is indeed supremely important, but also extremely obvi- ous. It was not so when Mr. Ruskin first taught it. The man who in the pre-Ruskinian era was the High Priest among connoisseurs was Sir George Beaurnont ; and Sir George, admirable man as he was in other respects, when he looked at a landscape, asked, not whether it was true to the facts of nature, but whether it accorded with the fictions of con- vention. "But where is your brown tree?" he asked of Constable when that painter gave in his adherence to the then revolutionary course of proclaiming that trees were green. No part of Mr. Ruskin's Gospel has won wider acceptance, and in so doing effected a greater revolution in Art, than his vindication of truth in landscape. And one sees whence his success came. " Out of the fulness of the heart the mouth speaketh." To the man who has walked with nature, and seen in it " God Almighty's facts," the conventions of the ideal school are flat blasphemy. " No other man in England," 10 " THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO RUSKIN.* said Carlyle of Mr. Ruskin's political economy, " has in him the same divine rage against falsity." But false wares may be passed in pictures as well as in trade, and Mr. Rus- kin's "divine rage" was spent against both alike. " Ideas of But it must not be supposed that in preach- Beauty:" ^^ '^ Ruskinat j^g Truth in Art he ignores the function of Tpaim'e?"'^ Beauty. On the contrary, it is as an inter- preter of Beauty that Mr. Ruskin has probably attracted most readers. The peculiarities of his education have in this respect given him a unique position and insight. He is at once a — . I Puritan and a painter, an Evangelical by train- in g, a Catho lic by taste. Hence he has resisted DOth the Philistinism of Evangelical religion and the frivolity or false sentiment of popular art. To the " se^hetes " in particular he has ever be en a deadly enemyj, and there js not a li ne in his Jjooks which does not give the lie t o the principle, or a rebuke to the practice, of that school. ^SJcording - to it, the «ss€-nee ]