425 W25 LIBRARY ANNEX ALBERT R. MAJNN LIBRARY 4 It JL CORNELL UNIVERSITY Cornell University Library TD 425.W25 Stream po lution in New York state.A pre 3 1924 003 631 995 STREAM POLLU VM T\ NEW YORK STATE HENRY f Zoology Id fVARD. Ph*I &J1L®, \LBASST STREAM POLLlfllON IN XTT? W7 VAD TZ" CHT A HPT? A Preliminary Investigation of the Problem from the Standpoint of the Biologist Made |n July and August, 1918 By HENRY B. WARD, Ph. D. Professor of Zoology in the University of Illinois STATE OF NEW YORK CONSERVATION COMMISSION GEORGE D. PRATT Commissioner ALEXANDER MACDONALD - Deputy Commissioner WARWICK S. CARPENTER Secretary MARSHALL McLEAN Counse ALBANY J. B. LYON COMPANY* PRINTERS 1919 CONTENTS PAGE Foreword 5 Importance of the Problem "7 Multiplicity and Significance of Aquatic Organisms 9 Natural and Unnatural Conditions of Aquatic Existence. 11 General Losses by Stream Pollution 18 Effects of Domestic Sewage 24 Effects of Industrial Wastes 25 Return to Natural Conditions 35 Biological Examination of Water Bodies , 37 Preliminary Survey of Stream Conditions 53 "Recommendations 72 am • <83&. ^~'l *# *fe 4 ••# ■*».<»* £ :: ** ■>& ! m % % *. Map of Stream Pollutions in New York State On this map, industrial establishments that are potential polluters of streams are indicated by pins of different colors, each class of industry being assigned a distinctive color. The heavy irregular lines indicate the boundaries of river systems. The map is thus a visual representation of conditions upon every watershed, and of the extent of pollution over the entire state. STREAM POLLUTION IN NEW YORK SIT ATP FOREWORD In June, 191 8, I was honored by an invitation from the Conseiva- tion Commission to spend the summer in studying the problem of stream pollution in New York state. In the original letter Commis- sioner George D. Pratt w^ote, " The state laws prohibit the discharge of factory waste, chemicals, etc., in quantities sufficient to kill fish. The law has been inadequate for the reason that it is difficult to prove that the discharge is the cause of the mortality." In replying I called attention to the fact that the question has various aspects, the legal, the chemical, and the biological and indicated my own lack of fitness to consider the problem from either the first or the second viewpoint ; but indicated that if the question was felt to call for biological investigation, I was both ready and interested to take it up. I felt it necessary to emphasize that fact at the outset because I was conscious that as a rule the biological side of the problem had been greatly neglected if not entirely overlooked. Personally, I was inclined to feel that this aspect was important and offered little appreciated opportunities for aiding in the solution of the questions involved ; yet I knew there were those who did not regard it as sufficiently significant to demand consideration early in any such investigation. I found that the Conservation Commission was already far advanced in the study of other phases of the problem of stream pollution and welcomed an examination and development of this phase which had not heretofore received special attention at their hands. This statement must be made at the outset in order to show clearly from what point of view the subject is attacked in the discussion that follows. I do not fail to appreciate the importance and even the essential character of other considerations even though they are not discussed in subsequent pages of this report. The time devoted to the investigation was only about two months and this is evidently inadequate even for a reconnoissance in a field 6 New York State so large and on a problem so involved. Whatever success may have been attained in securing an outline of the situation and formulating the plan submitted herewith is due in first instance to the cordial cooperation extended by the staff of the Commission. Everyone with whom I came in contact manifested a personal interest in the work and devoted time and energy enthusiastically to assisting in every possible way. IMPORTANCE OF THE PROBLEM OF STREAM POLLUTION The problem of stream pollution is undoubtedly one of the most important at present before the country. A prominent member of the United States Food Administration who was concerned with the question of fish foods and particularly the means for increas- ing the amount and facilitating the distribution thereof, in order to add to the general food supply of the country during the war, has stated that more than 60 per cent of the suggestions sent in for his assistance from all the parts of the country urged on his attention some aspect of the question of stream pollution and its correction because in the solution of this problem lay everywhere the greatest possibilities for the improvement of fisheries and the increase in fish food. Evidently the question presents itself in its most serious aspects in the oldest parts of the country and in those regions which possess the largest population and the greatest manufacturing interests. As might be expected, New York state, by virtue of all of these features, is one in which stream pollution has become marked and has exercised a powerful and unfortunate influence on the streams and their fisheries. Of course even within the limits of the Empire State, however, conditions vary quite as widely as they do between the most extreme parts of the country. In the heart of the Adirondack Mountains and amid the protected surroundings of the Forest Preserve stream pollution is so little significant that a game protector in such a place could report in perfectly good faith, " I never heard of any instance in my terri- tory." But along the valleys manufacturing interests have been concentrated until the accumulated wastes of city and factory make of the splendid rivers of the state sources of danger rather than of pleasure and profit. For years our greatest city has been justly protesting against the polluted condition of the magnificent river that has been in the past a source of pride not only to that city but to the state and the nation. And it is not merely a question of senti- ment, for those who have studied the problems of the fisheries and have seen something of the present condition of the Hudson river will not hesitate to maintain that the commercial value of the stream has been very greatly reduced by the conditions that exist in it at the present time. It is wise to note here the situation in other countries, lest some 8 Xew York: State one should be tempted to suggest that these conditions are the unavoidable results of increase in population and in manufacturing, that the old time natural conditions could only be maintained when men were scattered and manufacturing activities simple in character and limited in extent, and hence that they have disappeared for- ever — a loss which one should regret, yet must acknowledge to be inseparably connected with the development of a more effective social organization. In Europe the population is generally much denser than here, and there are many regions where manufacturing has been carried on far longer and more intensively than here. Those countries have had to meet the same problems in the disposal of wastes which confront us here, and often in more acute form. The careless, unsanitary centuries of the past had left an accumu- lated burden of wastes in city and town and along river and lake that made the solution of the question more difficult by far than it is here. Prejudice and conservatism have been obstacles there of real moment, and yet in numbers of such places the situation has been well handled. One should not claim that all problems have been solved or all waters restored to proper condition, but fishing is better in streams of the Old World than in similar regions in New York state, and the rivers of Europe are less polluted than corre- sponding streams here. This is the result of active public interest and definite work on the problem. The work which has been clone there has demonstrated that satisfactory results can be achieved and in many cases has furnished the specific methods for handling our own problems. If our indifference and inattention can be trans- formed into active concern, then even greater results can be attained here. MULTIPLICITY AND SIGNIFICANCE OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Number and Variety The life of our waters is both varied and abundant. It differs from the life of the land chiefly in that the most conspicuous and largest types of both animals and plants are lacking, but the number and variety of the smaller forms and of the microscopic species is abundant beyond all ordinary conception. One has only to glance over the pages of such a work as The Life of Inland Waters by Professor James G. Needham of Cornell and his colleague, Mr. J. T. Lloyd, to find a wealth of information and abundant illustrations of this life. In it one may become familiar with the various types of aquatic environment, the various aquatic organisms, both plant and animal forms, and with their adjustment to conditions of aquatic life. One finds that they are organized into definite aquatic societies which depend upon different conditions for their existence, and accordingly occur in different places. More intensive treatment of some of the same factors is found in the appropriate chapters of a book by Professor V. E. Shelford entitled Animal Communities in Temperate America; and, finally, if there is need to emphasize the abundance and variety of such organisms, evidence will be obtained from a recent work entitled Fresh-Water Biology which I have published with the cooperation of a series of specialists on various groups. It may indicate the wealth of the forms found in North American fresh water to say that over noo pages are re- quired to present a summary of the topic and the 1547 illustrations used do not show even all the important genera as only a few forms are figured under fishes, insects and plants. Under natural con- ditions, the aquatic species are varied and beautiful in form and extraordinarily abundant in numbers. Relation to Purity of Water Observation of any individual water body with reference to the character of the organisms in it and the abundance of these smaller types of life yields readily incontrovertible evidence with reference to the purity of its water. For the most part these minute organisms are confined to a limited area or, if distributed more widely, are 10 New Yoek State dependent upon the action of the current for transport. Further- more, while the naturalist may at times collect a few specimens for study, the abundance of the forms is, generally speaking, so great that the effect of such collecting cannot be detected immediately after it has been done, and in most cases the only way in which this fauna and flora can be eliminated is through the influence of unfavor- able conditions in the environment. If some chance fisherman has hunted certain kinds of insect larvae for bait, such as dobson and helgramites, there are still to be found normally scores and hundreds of other sorts, and their absence is clear evidence of some general influence of an unfavorable character. Furthermore, the argument does not rest upon any particular species or even upon any single group and takes into account both animals and plants, the kinds that grow fast to the stones on the bottom, those that frequent shallows, or occur only in the deeper places, the varieties that float in the water as well as those that burrow in the bed of the stream. Finally, we know in considerable measure the relation of individual organisms to water conditions. We recognize that certain species are rare and others abundant, that a given form occurs only in pure waters and other types are seen only in polluted streams. We recognize also types that are intermediate and so by the gradual appearance and disappearance of series of organisms we can trace directly the transition from an area of pure water with its character- istic organisms to a polluted region with entirely different types of life, or in the extreme instance, without any living organisms what- ever The estimate which one places on biological conditions of the land surface in any given region is based, not upon a single item but upon the general appearance of the area, and takes into account all of the features. We have come in daily contact with these so long that we take in complex factors at a glance and pass judgment almost instantaneously with regard to the condition of the lawn, or field, or garden tract. Now, the same test may be applied without difficulty to water bodies, though it is, for reasons already mentioned, not quite so easy to see the condition as in the case of a land area. We observe the sum total of appearances along the shore, in shallow waters, on bars in the stream, over the bed of the river or lake, and even in the open water itself. To be sure one is dealing here with factors which are not familiar to the ordinary individual, but they are well known to the students of such areas and data are easily accessible to the individual who desires to inform himself with re- gard to the situation. NATURAL AND UNNATURAL CONDITIONS OF AQUATIC EXISTENCE Essential Conditions It is somewhat difficult for the mind to get a clear picture of conditions existing below the surface of the water. This is doubtless due to the fact that the light is largely reflected from that surface and does not display to us clearly the objects that lie beneath. The eye takes in at most limited areas, rather than the long stretches of bottom territory. It finds them very differently constituted from the surface of the dry land. We are inclined to consider the situation more complex and difficult to understand than it really is. In truth, the essentials of existence are the same in the water as on the land. Each organism demands for its existence a certain food supply and it must have also a supply of oxygen available for respiration. A shortage of oxygen in the water has precisely the same effect upon fish that an insufficient supply of oxygen in the atmosphere has upon air breathing animals. All degrees of oxygen deficiencies may be observed in the water, as they are on the land in the atmos- phere, and among the organisms of the water all grades of effect produced may be observed that are familiar to us among air breath- ing animals under similar atmospheric conditions. A shortage of oxygen either kills or stupefies the fish, or, it may be, drives them away from the abnormal environment to seek better conditions elsewhere. Movements of Fish A shortage of food is promptly met by the migration of fish from the region. Like other animals, they are quick to react toward an approaching shortage of food, and having considerable activity may desert a region entirely and move to some distant point without attracting the attention even of those who are watching the stream day by day. Fish also carry out natural movements of their own in response to the reproductive instinct and to modifications in the temperature of the water and to the amount of silt which it carries, or, in other words, to the variation of the stream with the changing seasons and periods of drought and rainfall. It is not easy to dis- tinguish these migrations from those which are due to food shortage. 12 New Yokk State Furthermore, it is very evident that the absence of fish at a given point need not necessarily be explained by their movements at all The readiest way to account for the situation is to furnish the ever- ready excuse that the stream has been over-fished. Knowing- the situation superficially, the public is ready to accept this explanation, and there is no doubt that .t applies with full force to certain locali- ties and to many kinds of fish. There are, however, some elements in the situation which are not always considered. Effects of Catching Fish In the first place, over-catching may reduce the supply of game and food fish, but it hardly has any such distinct effect upon the numerous other kinds, especially the intermediate and smaller species that are naturally abundant in most waters. Accordingly, if the reduction in the fish population were due to over-catching, one would expect to note the absence of those species which have been followed up by anglers and commercial fishermen, and at the same time to record the presence of the other sorts. In fact, our game and food fishes are almost exclusively large forms that spend their energies preying upon the smaller species, so that if the food fishes were eliminated, the smaller forms would meet with less competition and would become more abundant, and more conspic- uous, also, for they would not be driven to sheltered places of concealment, but would have opportunities to range freely through the water, as they could not if the large types were preying upon them. Accordingly, the absence of the smaller types of fish is clearly indicative of the fact that in some respects at least the con- ditions of the environment are not satisfactory. It may be that the food supply is lacking, or that the chemical environment is preju- dicial to health and normal existence, or finally that some factor has interfered with the carrying out of the reproductive functions. Effects of Changed Environment Every one of these conditions certainly obtains in individual cases. The reproductive period is perhaps the most vulnerable point in the life history of the fish and the one at which unfavorable conditions affect its numbers most rapidly and seriously. The erection of dams not provided with fishways interposes barriers beyond which the fish cannot go in its effort to reach head waters and small tributaries where many species spawn. These dams also establish a constant level for the stretch of the stream above the barrier. In this way Stream Pollution 13 the shallows are eliminated and the beds of gravel may be covered too deeply for their utilization as spawning grounds by many fish. In case the dams are located close together, so that the water from one backs up close to the foot of the next above, this difficulty becomes very real. The construction of works for current regula- tion, such as lateral dikes, shutting off the shallow shore areas, also modifies the general character of the stream so radically as to put serious obstacles in the way of the spawning and development of many kinds of fish. Conditions of this sort may be seen between Albany and Troy and at other points along the Hudson. The elimination of shallow areas near the banks affects aquatic life more than might appear at first thought. These are the places where aquatic plants grow abundantly and where small aquatic animals are bred in multitudes. They afford spawning ground for certain of the fishes and furnish hiding places to the young fish of all sorts and to the smaller species. Finally they are the regions which hold out longest against the pollution of the water and in which suitable conditions of existence are found longer than in the open stream. A little reflection will show clearly the extent to which natural conditions have been modified within recent years. The increase in population in New York state within fifty years is the first element in the change, but the influence of this is much less conspicuous than that of other factors. During the same period the character of the state has changed somewhat rapidly. The cities have grown greater ; general farming is relatively a less conspicuous occupation of the citizens of the state. On the other hand the amount of manu- facturing has increased enormously. Increase of Chemical Wastes Even this, however, does not bring out the most conspicuous element in the situation. The manufacturing of the present day is characterized in a conspicuous way by the chemical processes involved. These lead to the production of quantities of peculiar waste materials, and while the industrial wastes of the past were small in amount, relatively simple and stable in composition, those of the present are conspicuous for their volume and for the variety and changeful character of the materials produced. Where formerly the addition of such wastes resulted at most in the destruction of life in a small stream and in poisoning or polluting a relatively limited area surrounding the outlet, at the present time the frequent addition of new and powerful poisons in large quantities has 14 New York State extended the areas in which life has been destroyed or highly modi- fied until they extend for miles along the stream and involve entire rivers. In fact, in the most densely populated portions of the state and on the greater river systems, one source of pollution overlaps the one next lower down on the watershed to such an extent that the entire stream is seriously affected. A new danger confronts us in considering modifications that have come over even the small village communities and towns in their relation to this problem. The sewage which they formerly turned out into a convenient stream was composed almost exclusively of organic wastes. It was subject to rapid transformation under natural conditions, and the stream flowing, as such streams do in most cases in this state, over a broken, stony or rocky bed, tended to accumulate oxygen and thereby to assist in the rapidity of the changes which led to the ultimate transformation of the domestic sewage into materials that could be utilized by living organisms. Modification of Domestic Wastes At the present time even in small villages it is not possible to find domestic sewage of an unmodified type. What is designated under that name is really a mixture containing often much trade waste. The existence of small factories, or at least machine shops with oil and gasoline waste that is turned into the sewer system, has transformed the original easily handled sewage material into that which resists the ordinary methods of self purification in flow- ing waters, and constitutes a lasting menace to the life that normally would be found in the streams. It is an unfortunate fact that whatever may be the average yearly run off there has been in connection with these changes a distinct and considerable reduction at certain seasons in the volume of stream flow, so that even if sewage conditions had not been changed the amount of dilution would be much less at the present time than it was formerly. Thus the process has been unfavorably modified at both ends and at present the situation is changing conspicuously for the worse, so that it is necessary to look for some means of improv- ing matters before the point is reached where all the life of our streams will have been destroyed. Canalization Lessens Purification In some regions another factor has been annmportant element in increasing the difficulties of the situation, and that is the modifica- tion of the stream itself through canalization. Water flowing over Stkeam Pollution 15 a stony or rocky bottom with falls or rapids from point to point to mix it with the air will take on oxygen very rapidly. Once, however, let the current be stopped and the water accumulated in deep, slow flowing masses, the process of purification is almost entirely inhibited so that it proceeds very slowly indeed. This is exactly the condition which has arisen as the streams have been more and more perfectly utilized for water power. The erection of a dam below a series of rapids or ripples, impounding the water to a con- siderable depth and backing it up to a point which in the ultimate development of the stream will represent approximately the base of the dam next higher up, makes of a natural water course with its rapidly flowing current only a series of ponds in which the movemen: Is almost imperceptible. Wastes delivered into the stream when the latter has reached this condition of stability will be precipitated to form a layer on the bottom, the thickness of which is regulated by the amount, and the change in which is reduced nearly to zero. Where in the original condition the stream might have endured the contamination and have been able to effect self purification within a reasonable distance, the new conditions are entirely unfavorable for changes and under them the stream is transformed into what, in these conditions, is simply a series of septic tanks. In these, the life characteristic of pure waters is entirely eliminated and the only organisms which can survive are those of putrefaction. Canalization is a necessary feature of our modern industrial development, but pollution, the evil effects of which are seriously augumented by canalization, has no such argument in its favor. Canalization thus provides a new reason for the elimination of stream contamination. Influence of Pollution on Aquatic Life Let us consider more carefully the effect of stream pollution upon fish life. At another place in the discussion I have taken up the question as to whether the absence of fish from streams is due to pollution or to other causes. In those instances in which pollution is both recognized and admitted, there certainly must have been considerable influence exerted upon the availability of those waters as areas for the existence and propagation of fish. If the substances which are discharged into the water are directly poisonous to fish and are poured out in such quantities that even the volume of the stream does not dilute them beyond the point at which the poison is fatal, the entire fish population will be killed or driven 16 New York State away and the area coming under the influence of this waste become thereby barren of fish life. Plenty of evidence can be given to prove that this occurs frequently, on streams of moderate or small size. While such areas are to be found, the absence of fish life is in fact not the most serious characteristic. In the adult condition the fish are relatively large and as little susceptible to the effects of pollution as any organisms which inhabit the water. Even though they may be lacking from a given area, it \s often the case that they have been driven away by adverse conditions, as well as directly destroyed through poisonous substances. The net result of driving fish out of water that might be made productive is quite as bad as killing them in it. Chemical substances which are of such a character as to destroy the life of the small organisms will eliminate from the territory those things on which directly or indirectly the fish feeds, and with the disappearance of its food the fish are forced to migrate or to starve. They are quick to respond to such influence, as i& well known to fishermen, for by thoroughly baiting a given area with food, fish may be readily attracted into it and are, of course, also sought in those places that are the best feeding grounds. Con- versely, an area barren of life is not a satisfactory place io go fish- ing. The absence of other forms of life is good evidence that the fish will not, in general, be found there. Evidently, then, agencies that tend to reduce a water area to a barren condition will be promptly instrumental in driving away the fish that naturally con- gregate in that territory. Pollution and Fish Propagation There is another way in which pollution of water very directly and seriously affects its fish population, and that is in the influence upon the propagation of the species. Fish deposit their eggs variously, but, in general, at selected points in the stream bottom, some species choosing one kind of environment and others selecting another. Fish seek for this purpose a clean area of bottom, or prepare it in definite fashion by brushing away the dirt from a limited space which serves as a nest. If the waters are highly polluted, the sediment which covers the bottom befouls the area and reduces the free oxygen to low terms. As a result, a satisfac- tory nest cannot be cleaned out, or, if it is, the adjacent decaying materials still affect the water so unfavorably that the eggs cannot live and the reproductive activities of the fish are seriously interfered Stream Pollution 17 with. Migrating fish, like shad or salmon, that seek definite parts of the stream system for spawning, are compelled, in the absence of satisfactory locations, to spawn on polluted areas, and the eggs have little chance to develop properly. As the organism is exceedingly susceptible in this stage of its existence, conditions which could be endured by the adult fish will often prove fatal to the eggs. These conditions prevent the species from holding its own in the face of the demands upon the supply that are made by the fishermen. Still another feature demands consideration in this connection. The state is breeding annually large quantities of young fish at considerable expense. It takes at the appropriate season the eggs of a given species, places them in a hatchery under proper conditions of development, and, after having protected them through the period of growth within the egg and perhaps, also, after having protected and fed them through the earlier stages of existence, it has a mass of fry or fingerlings to plant out for the rehabilitation of the stream. These stages are not so sensitive as the tgg stage, for the fish with every period of time that elapses from the start of its development becomes more and more immune to the dangers of existence; yet even in these free-swimming young stages, the fry and fingerlings are much more delicate than the adult fish and will succumb to conditions that would merely drive away the adult rather than destroy them. It is hardly a profitable business for the state to raise at such a considerable expense quantities of young fish in order to plant them out in waters in which the chances of existence are unfavorable. To summarize this phase of our study: The pollution of the water, especially by industrial wastes, results first, in the geath of the adults ; or second, in driving them away from polluted ?ireas. It makes the territory unfit for natural repro- duction and destroys the eggs of the fish, thus interfering with the means" for the preservation of the species. Finally, it brings to naught the efforts of the state for rehabilitating the supply of fish, since the young fish which are planted maintain a limited and precarious existence in polluted areas, if indeed they are not de- stroyed by the unfavorable environment. 2 GENERAL LOSSES BY STREAM POLLUTION The value of the individual water body is not always apparent and the significance of the destruction wrought by eliminating the life from it frequently appears only after a careful analysis of the situa- tion. It is not possible within the limits of this report to do more than indicate some phases of the argument on this question, but they will serve to suggest other particulars and to demonstrate clearly the need of careful study that the public may not suffer unrecognized losses of a serious character which it may be difficult to make good. In any case, it is expensive in time and money to restore a stream to its original condition. Individual examples of particular factors in the problem may be cited here. Value of Small Streams The small streams which empty into lakes or constitute the side branches of larger river systems are in a sense insignificant. Their area is trivial, the amount of water they carry is not large, and, from any standpoint, one might think the destruction of living conditions within them to be of little moment for the general welfare. But such places are, in the first instance, breeding grounds for the larger fish. At some period of the year, and often at several such for different species, fish migrate into the smaller and shallower waters, deposit their eggs and return to the larger environment. Unless one has studied the streams carefully, he may be entirely unacquainted with the fact of this relation, for while all know the movements of the larger fish, which, like shad or salmon, migrate in enormous schools to their spawning grounds, yet men do not recognize, gener- ally, the movements of other species which go more irregularly or in smaller groups, and traverse shorter distances* Now, whatever renders the stream barren and incapable of supporting life eliminates it from functioning as a spawning ground, and it requires little reflection to see that the destruction of spawning areas limits or ultimately terminates the reproductive activities of the species and will be followed by the extermination of the fish. Indeed, there is no doubt that the marked reduction in the numbers of adult fish in many regions is directly traceable to the destruction of spawning grounds, or to the presence of conditions which if not fatal are very unfavorable to the young in the egg or fry stage when they are so susceptible to injurious influences. Stbeam Pollution 19 Pollution in Small Streams The effects of pollution in such a small stream are not, however, summed up completely by any means in the previous paragraph. The same contamination which renders the area unfit for reproduc- tive purposes destroys the smaller organisms of the water. The insect larvae are killed, and the smaller crustaceans and the micro- scopic animals and plants suffer a similar fate. Now, these organ- isms multiply most rapidly in the shallower areas. They are pro- duced constantly in enormous numbers in such places, and are carried on in part directly and in part through the medium of smaller fish to replenish the food supply of the other parts of the river system, and thus to furnish substances ultimately for the adult fish which immediately interest man. The effect of contaminating the smaller stream is seen in a diminution of the general food supply in the water system of which it is a part. Effects on Larger Streams < These influences, however, are not confined to the smaller streams with which the discussion started. They affect equally the rivers and lakes with which these smaller streams connect. So long as the amount of pollution is small, the larger stream does not show the effect so quickly. It may be, indeed, that for a long time the amount of pollution affects the large stream merely within a limited area or only so much that the life in it does not find the opportunity for vigorous development, and the investigator examining the water has to record that various elements of the fauna and flora are scanty, that aquatic life is poorly developed or absent from some regions and confined to the more productive areas, or to portions in which the contribution from uncontaminated water in certain tributaries makes an area more favorable for the development of life. But, as the subsidiary streams become more and more affected, the main stream assumes an increasingly unfavorable condition, until the organisms of pure water are gradually but more or less completely replaced by those that characterize polluted waters. This replace- ment occurs first at the points of greatest pollution, such as near the discharge of an industrial waste or the inflow of a highly polluted side-stream. It extends down stream and over the general area of the larger water body, gradually eliminating all of the characteristics of the original river and substituting those of the open sewer. Influence of Seasonal Changes These conditions evidently vary with the seasons. When the natural flow in the stream is lowest, and the dilution of the water 20 New Yoek State less, then the greatest effect is noted, and a season of extremely low- water is accompanied by a spread of the polluted area that often is conspicuous enough to attract the attention of the ordinary observer as well as of the trained naturalist. Instances illustrating all of these cases are on record in the office of the Conservation Commis- sion, and are familiar to the public generally in statements concern- ing the conditions of streams at individual points as recorded by residents or inspectors of various kinds. It is fortunate that ordinarily the water is highest at that time when one finds the largest migration of fish for spawning purposes, that is, in the months of spring and early summer; for high water results, first, in the maximum dilution of the wastes so that they do the least possible damage, and, in the second place, in washing out the accumulated material so that the bottom is relieved in part, at least, of the accumulated wastes that have been deposited through low water periods, and of the products of decay that have come from the destruction of life by the action of the wastes during the pre- ceding seasons. Shad in the Hudson If it were not for this seasonal dilution, I imagine that the Hud- son river would have suffered even more seriously than it has in the diminution of the shad run, for the number of shad that return annually to the stream to propagate themselves is directly related to the number of young fish that have been hatched in the river pre- viously and have gone out to the ocean to feed and to grow to maturity. It is perfectly clear that the number of young shad migrat- ing into ocean waters depends upon the success of the reproductive season in which they were hatched. It is only very imperfectly cor- related with the number of eggs deposited, since the character of the bottom and of the water itself will determine pretty largely what per cent of the eggs hatch out successfully and what number of young shad-fry find food and other conditions favorable for exist- ence so that they can complete their development and carry out successfully their movement into the ocean. The shad catch is a matter of large importance to the state and to the nation, and it clearly depends directly upon the condition of the stream. One may maintain confidently that its diminution in recent years is directly connected with the growing pollution of the river, although it would be impossible to say exactly to what degree it is affected thereby. Furthermore, one may prophesy with assurance that if pollution Stbeam Pollution 21 increases as rapidly in the future as it has in the immediate past, the time is close at hand when the shad will be as great a rarity in the Hudson as the salmon is today in the Connecticut. Salmon in Atlantic Rivers It is worth while to recount briefly the history of the salmon in New England rivers as illustrated well by the record of the Con- necticut river, from which, even though the cause is not the same, is indicated clearly what will happen to the shad of the Hudson if attention is not directed to the problem promptly and energetically enough to control the unfavorable conditions that are growing up and have gone so far at the present moment that the end of the story is in sight. In his discussion of the Atlantic salmon, David Starr Jordan writes as follows : " The salmon was at one time very abundant in the Connecticut, and it probably occurred in the Housatonic and Hudson. * * * Many Connecticut people remember hearing their grandfathers say that when they went to the river to buy shad the fishermen used to stipulate that they should buy a specified number of salmon, also. But at the beginning of this century they began rapidly to diminish. Mitchill stated, in 1814, thkt in former days the supply to the New York market usually came from the Connecticut, but of late years from the Kennebec, covered with ice. Reverend David Dudley Field, writing in 181 9, states that salmon had scarcely been seen in the Connecticut for 15 or 20 years. The circumstances of their extermi- nation in the Connecticut are well known, and the same story, with names and dates changed, serves equally well for other rivers. In 1798 a corporation, known as the 'Upper Locks and Canal Company ' built a dam 16 feet high at Millers River, 100 miles from the mouth of the Connecticut. For 2 or 3 years fish were seen in great abundance , below the dam, and for perhaps 10 years they continued to appear, vainly striving to reach their spawning grounds ; but soon the work of extermination was complete. When, in 1872, a solitary salmon made its appearance, the Saybrook fisherman did not know what it was." This instance of the disappearance of a species from the aquatic fauna is definitely traceable to interference with the reproductive function. It concerns a form that had great economic value. Other cases can be cited that are equally clear and that bear directly upon the topic of this report. I shall use only one and it is almost as striking though the form concerned has only moderate economic worth. 22 New York State Example of Illinois River The effects of stream pollution on the aquatic fauna are well illustrated by the record of Forbes and Richardson (1913) of work done on the Illinois river. A simple group such as the mollusks, or particularly the river mussels, which have a restricted range of movement, furnishes the following characteristic data taken from the extended records of the river study. At Morris, 9 miles below the junction of the uncontaminatecl Kankakee and the Des Plaines, heavily polluted by the waters of the drainage canal which enter this stream 20 miles above the junction, the record states, " The search for mollusks yielded seven species of mussels, all the speci- mens dead, however, except for one collection made in Mazon slough." At the Marseilles dam, 17 miles below Morris " no living Unios were secured either above or below the dam, although the mussel-bar was diligently used in both places/' At Ottawa " diligent use of the crowfoot dredge in various situations brought to light no living mussels except a bar in Fox river water just outside the mouth of that stream. Here two species were obtained alive, and dead shells of eight other species, * * * indicative of an environ- ment still difficult for mollusks." At La Salle " thirty-six specimens, representing ten species (of mussels) included twelve living speci- mens of S species only. * * * The large proportion of dead specimens, as compared with ratios obtained farther down the stream, indicate unfavorable conditions for mussels." At Spring Valley " shells of s species of mussels were dredged from the bottom — all dead, however, except one specimen." At Hennepin "seventeen species of mussels were collected alive and five others were repre- sented only by dead shells. * * * The number of living shells as compared with dead ones is in marked contrast to the conditions found above." " This was the first station at which the life of the river may be said to have found virtually normal conditions " in 191 2. As the last point is more than 60 miles from the first record given, one can see how slowly the stream assumes normal conditions in the face of the addition of such a mass of sewage as is introduced by the Chicago drainage canal. If the data for more active species had been used, they would have shown that such forms are lacking, having been driven away by the adverse conditions, or having suc- cumbed to them. In most such cases, since the animals have not hard shells like those of the mussels to leave behind as silent witnesses of the unsuccessful struggle against an unfavorable environment, their absence would be the only evidence obtained by field observations of the unfitness of the region for life of that sort. Stream Pollution 23 The destruction of the river mujsels happens to be of direct economic significance since their shells form the basis of the important pearl button industry in the middle west. Even had the pollution of these waters not been sufficient to kill the adult mussels, yet these forms would have been wiped out by the destruction of the young fish to which the young mussels are attached during early stages of growth ; and on which they depend also for their dis- tribution in the stream. Moreover the condition of the mussels is a fair index of that of other organisms in the water. To the two examples given any number of others could be added as desired; interference with natural conditions results in the destruction of aquatic organisms of all types and the most serious influence in this destruction is stream pollution. The losses are indirect as well as direct, but all contribute to reduce and ultimately to destroy the value of the stream to the state, that is to the people in general. EFFECTS OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE Self -Purification of Streams It will aid in our understanding of the general problem if brief consideration is given to the effect of domestic sewage, and particu- larly to the purification of streams polluted with it. One sees the process carried out so commonly and often so rapidly and so well that one does not stop to wonder what becomes of all the sewage which day and night is being discharged into our streams from the rapidly increasing city population of this country. The time was for more than a century that Troy poured its sewage into the Hudson river while Albany only six miles away drew from the stream its drinking water, and indeed found it bright and clear and unobjectionable. To consider it merely a matter of dilution is to overlook the real condition. The material had been actually changed and not merely diluted, so there was no sewage in the river when the water reached Albany. But little by little the zone of pollution extended down stream until sight and smell no less than scientific study warned against the practice. The circumstances have repeated themselves a score of times or more in the course of this same stream, until now the noble river, that once ran unsullied from the mountains to the sea, shows little of its former purity and has lost much of its value to the state, if, indeed, it is not in some ways an actual menace to the welfare of the region adjacent to it. The two questions suggested for our consideration are equally interesting and important. First, how does the river get rid of the human wastes turned into its waters and become again pure and healthful; and, secondly, why does the process fail later, or what causes the loss of the power of self purification manifested at an earlier date? Pollution and purification are evidently antagonistic processes; under circumstances either may become master of the situation, and it behooves man to know what factors control the results, that he may aid the one process or restrain the other. The application of this knowledge to the Hudson in earlier times would evidently have retained this stream in its original purity and wealth of aquatic life, while adequate, intelligent treatment of the situation may even now restore the stream to its pristine condition. C E. Turner has recently made an intensive study for two years of the Stream Pollution 25 purification of a small sewage polluted stream in Massachusetts. Of one article (Turner, 1918) discussing the results of this work, a brief outline may be given to indicate the character of the changes. As the effluent from sand filter beds reaches the stream, a little creek of pure water and very moderate flow, the acquatic life is promptly changed. A gelatinous growth of Crenothrix, the iron bacterium, covers the entire bottom of the stream, which a little further down is black with a " pollution carpet " or " false bottom/' as he terms it. In this material bacteria abound and on it one finds gray woolly masses of Carchesium, while burrowing in it are seen colonies of red worms (Tublfex tubifex), a typical pollution species, and Midge larvae (Chironomus decorus), the so called "blood worm/* which is a most important factor in the removal of organic materials. At the place where the effluent enters, higher plants are lacking, but only three-quarters of a mile below they grow rankly, choking the stream and affording food and shelter to a multitude of smaller organisms, snails, isopods, daphnids, etc. Chemical changes in the stream are rapid in this short distance, the total organic nitrogen is greatly reduced, and the dissolved oxygen, which was richly present in the clear stream and nearly absent from the polluted water at the start, has been increased despite the rapid processes of oxidation which have gone on during the interval. At three-quarters of a mile from the original pollu- tion the false bottom no longer persists and the stream is nearly normal, though even one or two miles further down stream chemical tests demonstrate the existence of pollution. Turner summarizes this work thus (p. 45) : Importance of Biologic Factors " It is obvious that the biological factors of stream purification are much more important than the strictly chemical and physical factors * * * Certain organisms are characteristic of an unpol- luted stream. Others are characteristic of pollut on and by their presence and numbers indicate the intensity of biological activity. Some forms like rotifers and certain green algae may be present in either polluted or unpolluted water, and their correlation with each other and various plants and animals must be understood to appre- ciate their significance." The changes by which animal and plant wastes are transformed and utilized are universal in nature and are applied most profitably in agriculture generally. The concentrated wastes in domestic sew- 26 jNTew York State age are similarly transformed under favorable conditions in a stream and have been used in sewage forms for the enrichment of the soil with entire success from the biological standpoint, although Jhe financial returns have not been satisfactory. The rapidity with which these wastes in a stream are made into serviceable form for the support of life has suggested their utilization in fish culture. M. C. Marsh, formerly with the U. S. Bureau of Fisheries, has described (1916) a plan in successful operation at Strassburg for sewage disposal by fish culture. The sewage properly handled is made over rapidly into food for plants and small animals, which in turn serve as sustenance for small fish of various types. According to Marsh, the series of ponds and the dispoal plant present a sightly appearance, do not involve a nuisance and resemble any well-con- ducted fish culture station. As the process is delicately balanced, its successful and continuous operation depends on foresight and constant expert care. It clearly illustrates the process of nature in converting organic wastes into food materials and their appropria- tion by new living organisms. This process, even to the item of its relation to fish culture, is being carried on wherever domestic sewage is emptied into a stream. In reporting biological investigation on the Illinois river, with especial reference to " the enormous outpouring of Chicago sewage into the upper Illinois " by the drainage canal, Forbes (1910) sums up one aspect of the work in this statement : " The organic wastes thus emptied into the stream are laid hold of by bacteria and proto- zoa and passed up by successive steps to form the flesh and bone of fishes, and thus finally those of men. The same may be said of the organic wastes of the towns along the banks of the stream." As the quantity of waste materials added becomes larger, the point is reached when it exceeds the amount that can be handled promptly by the stream. This amount depends on several factors, viz., the volume of the stream, the rate of flow, and the character of shore ^nd bottom. These are features which determine the quantity of dissolved oxygen in the water and its replenishment when exhausted. They determine also the amount and development of the " pollution carpet," as it is called above, and the other organisms concerned in the process. When the stream is deep and flows slowly between steep banks there is little opportunity to take up oxygen and the processes of change proceed very slowly ; the con- taminated area spreads down stream, and gradually transforms the stream into a sewage d'tch or septic tank. This extension of the Stream Pollution 27 pollution area has been measured in the Illinois River and reaches seven miles or more annually. Such a figure indicates only the significant and serious character of the change, since its precise value depends on factors so numerous and variable that the record obtained in one place cannot be used to measure the change in another. The discussion just closed has shown that waters polluted by domestic sewage purify themselves naturally and that under favor- able conditions the process is carried out with remarkable rapidity, but that when the amount of sewage added becomes very large in proportion to the flow of the stream, the changes are greatly delayed so that the pollution persists a long distance. It indicates that, with increase in the volume of domestic wastes, a condition will be reached where it is no longer possible to discharge the material untreated and at the same time to maintain an aquatic environment suitable for fish life and the propagation thereof. EFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES The next question which demands consideration is the problem of industrial wastes. Character of Trade Wastes Industrial wastes are the by-products of manufacturing processes and are as varied in character as the industries themselves. They are relatively speaking a new factor in the relations between man and the natural environment. Starting not so very far back in history, they have risen in most recent years with startling rapidity to volumes that are proportionately large in comparison with the flow of the streams into which they are discharged. Because of their varied character, nearly every one of these industrial wastes offers a special individual problem, making it difficult to speak of them in general terms and ultimately demanding each its appropriate treatment for the correction of the evil. Furthermore, because of their very newness, their composition is unknown, as well as their action on living organisms. Nevertheless there are certain features which have been observed so often that they can be discussed as general characteristics of this type of materials. Effects of Mixing Trade and Domestic Wastes Serious difficulties have been introduced into the problem of stream pollution by the mixing of trade wastes with domestic sewage. It was never calculated that any system of city sewers should collect and discharge such wastes. Estimates of the character and significance of city sewage discharges are regularly based on the assumption that they contain the human and animal discharges produced in a community of the specified size, and the system provided for is based on these calculations. It needs only very meager and superficial observations to determine that in fact the sewage flow receives constant and not inconsiderable increments in the form of trade wastes. Small manufacturing plants, machine shops, laundries, garages and all sorts of other establishments creating oil, gasoline, alkaline, and chemical wastes have established direct connections with the sewers and pour into them without modifications all materials they desire to be rid of. As the city Stream Pollution 29 grows the practice increases, and probably also more rapidly than the growth of the city would indicate. The reality and the serious- ness of this practice has been recognized frankly, for instance by the three sanitary experts in their report to the Chicago Real Estate Board,* who say (p. 210) "A large part of the difficulty met in disposing of Chicago's sewage has been caused by trade wastes which have too freely been admitted to the sewers and open water- ways. It is not reasonable that excessive burdens of cost and incon- venience should be placed upon the public by manufacturing estab- lishments in this manner." Furthermore one cannot doubt that the difficulty is increasing as manufacturing plants become more numerous and trade wastes more varied and abundant. In the course of the brief examination I made in certain regions of New York State during the sum- mer of 1918, positive evidence was obtained that domestic sewage systems were carrying into public waterways recognizable trade wastes of various character and very considerable amount. It is important to emphasize this feature because it constitutes an indirect though very real contribution to the pollution of the streams, which may easily escape observation when the volume of these trade wastes at any point is combined with a larger volume of domestic sewage. As indicated in the comment of the Board of Sanitary Experts at Chicago, quoted above, this material interferes, and often seriously, with the process of self -purification which the stream has to undergo. From the biological view point its effects are apparent and even at times striking in the changes wrought in the aquatic fauna and flora. Aquatic life is wiped out and appar- ently does not reestablish itself readily, as It does when an excessive volume of domestic sewage is reduced. Deposits of a resistant character are laid down on the bed of the stream and deep-seated changes seem to have been brought about that make the region unsuitable for normal organisms and that endure unmodified by natural influences. Unless the unwarranted mixing of industrial and domestic wastes is checked, I am convinced that far-reaching and serious modifications will be produced in our water courses, which can be readjusted only with difficulty and after a long period of time. * A report to the Chicago Real Estate Board on the Disposal of the Sew- age and Protection of the Water Supply of Chicago, Illinois, by Messrs. George A. Soper, John D. Watson and Arthur J. Martin. 1915. 30 New York State Influence of Trade Wastes First of all, reference may be made to the reports of State Game Protectors, which are discussed further along in this report. In a questionnaire submitted to them, one inquiry was as follows: In your experience do wastes from industrial plants affect the stream more adversely than the wastes in city sewage? Nearly one-half (49%) of the protectors who replied stated positivel) that they did, another ten per cent thought they did and only five per cent said they did not. About one-third (35#) had no data on which to base an opinion. That such replies were not mere guesses or simple prejudice, but were founded on evidence, is shown by the answers to subsequent queries regarding the par- ticular wastes which in the opinion of the person reporting were most injurious to aquatic life, the places and times in which such damage had been observed, the manner in which the waste in question affected fish life, and the instances in which the treatment of wastes or their removal from the stream had proved beneficial to the fish therein. The answers contained such an amount of definite detail drawn from specific instances that no one could doubt the care with which such cases had been studied, the extended periods of time over which observations had been made, or the effort exerted to eliminate error, snap judgment, and unfair conclusions. Even though one granted that mistakes had been made, yet after all, the evidence was conclusive that such wastes exercised a powerful and baneful influence on the life of the streams. In the second place, the industrial wastes very often, if not always, produce such changes in the aspect of the water body that even the casual observer recognizes almost at once the extreme modification of natural conditions and the conspicuous destruction of things which he had been accustomed to see in such places. The change is so radical as to suggest an entirely new condition of affairs, and is as striking as the scar on the landscape produced by a fire in a forested region or by a landslide upon a mountain side. In some cases the bed of the stream appears to be cleaned out, and in others completely covered by a film of waste or by a layer of decaying material or even of some chemical products precipitated from the waste. Even though the observer is not sufficiently informed to determine the precise character of the substances that are spread over the territory, his examination of the water forces him to the conclusion that natural conditions have been eliminated and unnatural ones have taken their place. And he is right in Stueam Pollution- 31 believing that such changes interfere with the natural existence and proper reproduction of aquatic life. In the third place, many of the substances discharged in indus- trial wastes are known to be powerful poisons, so that one is forced to say in advance that their action on living organisms will be dis- tinctly unfavorable. In a given case it may be that the degree of dilution is so great that larger and more resistant species of plants and animals are not killed outright. Yet even in these instances the effects of such chemicals are injurious and the vitality of the organisms is lowered, the reproduction of the species is interfered with, or the sensitive stages of early life destroyed. Thus in one way or another the life of the stream is stunted and slowly elimi- nated until, if the process is unchecked, the stream becomes a desert. These conclusions do not rest purely on inference or even on imperfect field studies, but are supported and justified by experi- mental work in scientific laboratories, and some of the evidence secux-ed in this way will be given in a later section of this report. Industrial wastes constitute a large and increasing element in the pollution of our streams. They form a menace to the aquatic life that is most serious. There is no natural series of changes which render them inert or transform them in a short time into materials useful in the economy of nature. Each one offers in itself a problem as to, first, its exact effect on aquatic organisms, and, second, the treatment demanded to eliminate the evils it has caused. It should be noted as an exception to the general statements mada above that industrial wastes sometimes exert a mere mechanical influence on the conditions of the water-body into which they are discharged. Prejudice has long existed, undoubtedly with good reason, against the general habit of sawmills in earlier years when they were accustomed to turn loose the waste sawdust and trust to the current of a stream to dispose of it. While recent experiments have shown that the particles of sawdust floating in the water are not, as was formerly supposed, directly detrimental to fish, and do not interfere in the least with their respiratory processes, yet there remains little doubt that in other fashion the sawdust ^vaste is of ominous significance for them and the other life of the stream. The sawdust soon becomes water-logged and settles in thick masses as a loose cover on the bed of the stream. Great areas are covered over by it, all sorts of attached organisms are smothered, and the smaller animals are destroyed for lack of food and shelter v Soon the mass itself begins to decay, exhausting the oxygen from the water and 32 New Yokk State releasing poisonous products. The stream, originally characterized by an abundance of clear, pure-water animals, is so modified that it can afford existence only to those which live in a polluted environ- ment. Furthermore, the possibility of fish reproduction is very definitely interfered with, for the eggs that are deposited sink into the sawdust or are covered by it with the shifting of the bottom by the current. Those fish eggs which are abandoned and must depend upon chance for their development are unfortunately suffocated. Even those eggs which are watched by the adult fish, so that the nests are kept from being covered by the floating sawdust, find the water unfavorable for development and die off in large numbers. Finally the fry, if any hatch, seek in vain for food and shelter. Valuable fishing in both lakes and streams has been totally destroyed in this way* From the tanneries are discharged large amounts of carbonate of lime, which settles over the bottom in the form of a white film that is inimical to the smaller organisms of the water and apparently to the fish also. The wastes of steel mills are similarly deposited in characteristic form on the stones and gravel of the bottom. While here the character of the fluid wastes themselves is promptly destruc- tive to aquatic life, because o ftheir acid character, so that the deposit itself is of lesser significance, nevertheless it plays some part and is of especial sigificance in retarding the recovery of the stream. Wastes which are discharged from oil refineries are particularly inimical to aquatic life. They frequently form a firm adhesive film, covering the stones, bottom, and all other objects in the water. This covering seems to be a thin layer of tar, and is very resistant, so that even after the cause of the pollution has been removed, there remain visible signs of the pollution for a long time. These wastes are so resistant that it is difficult to find any way to purify them and no type of industrial waste is more serious to aquatic life. Such wastes come from gas plants as well as from oil refin- eries, and are unfortunately widely disseminated. The serious char- acter of their influence is vividly shown by field studies in a region where they are discharged into a stream. Many observers have seen a beautiful little brook rich in fish and other aquatic life trans- formed into a barren, unsightly, stinking stream, merely by the addi- tion of wastes from a small town gas plant. The experimental data confirm these observations fully and should be cited here in part that the matter may be clearly comprehended. Stream Pollution" 33 Toxicity of Gas House Wastes Marsh (1907) showed that tar is extremely poisonous to perch and bass. Illuminating gas is also very toxic. How small the amount actually is has been determined experimentally by Shelford (1917: 391) who states that " it may safely be said that ten to twenty parts per million of this waste [from a city gas plant] killed a 4-5 gram Lepomis humilis [the small sunfish] in an hour." Wells (1918, p. 568) , in summarizing his experiments on the two gases, says that both CO and C0 2 are poisonous to fishes, though the former is very much more deadly. So far as C0 2 is concerned, fishes are verv sensitive to small changes in the amount of it in the water and seek to avoid harmful concentrations by turning away from them. Fishes do not, however, appear to detect CO in the water and enter con- centrations of it that kill them in a few minutes. These concentra- tions are such as would follow the introduction of gas house wastes into water bodies. At the close of an extended series of experi- ments in the reactions of fishes to wastes, Shelford (1917:392) writes that " much of the danger to fishes from pollution of streams, especially when the pollution is local, is determined by the reactions of the fishes to the polluting substances. Fishes turn away from dangerous substances which are normally found in -their usual environment, but with strange or unusual substances, such as are thrown into streams by gas-works and other industrial plants, they frequently enter and follow up to points where the concentrations are fatal, or fail to recognize the dangerous substance at all and often stay in it until they are intoxicated and finally die there." In support of this conclusion he shows the results of experiments in a series of charts and graphs. Fishes are positive* in their reaction to gashouse wastes in all concentrations which Shelford used in his experiments. The complexity of the quest" ons involved is also shown by the statements of Wells, who determined that fishes vary much in power of resistance to different substances with the season. From the middle of June to the end of July resistance is least, and such fishes as the cyprinids die almost as soon as they are taken from the water. The resistance rises slowly from this time to September and then more rapidly until at the maximum in March and April all fish are very resistant. As the breeding season comes *An animal is said io react positively to a stimulus when it moves towards the source of the stimulus and negatively when it moves away from the source. The positive stimulus attracts the animal whereas the negative stimulus repels it 3 34 Nvav Yokk Stvtk the resistance falls. It was not possible to determine the effect of this factor on the breeding of the fish; but this is evidently a subject of very great importance. It would be possible to bring together data concerning the effect of other kinds of waste on aquatic life, but this would prolong the present discussion too greatly and the instances already elaborated are adequate to show the general questions involved. 1 think they are also sufficient to demonstrate the value of biological tests in securing a proper estimate of the effects of stream pollution, and the ways in which biological studies may be utilized in the solution of the problem. THE RETURN TO NATURAL CONDITIONS Slowness of Return to Normal Conditions Before passing to consider another topic, I should like to call attention specifically to the fact that a stream area from which natural life has been eliminated by pollution is extremely slow in recovery. In the questionnaire which was sent the game protectors, discussed elsewhere in this paper, they were asked, among other things, how long it took an area that had been adversely affected by pollution to become restored to normal conditions, and a number of them said in response to this question that the stream was never restored. This is the careful judgment of men trained to outdoor life and accustomed to observe stream conditions and to follow changes in them from year to year. Perhaps it would be wrong to accept this statement in an absolute and mathematical sense, but we shall not go far astray in taking it to be generally true. Once the life of a stream has been wiped out, the process of recovery demands a very long period of time, if, indeed, the stream is ever restored. Of course, no start can be made until the causes for the destruction of the aquatic life have been removed, and thereafter the restoration of normal conditions depends upon a series of factors that it is not difficult to outline in general, but impracticable to calculate in definite fashion. It is evident, without further argument, that the longer the pollution has been going on, the farther it has extended, the greater the area of the water in- volved, and the larger the amount of deleterious substances that have accumulated, the longer it will take for those changes to be carried out that will eliminate the poisonous substances and restore the bottom and the water to a condition in which life is possible again. Repopulation of the area will naturally be brought about by the migration of animals of various sorts from contiguous territory into the restored region, and, of course, also, by the planting of such organisms as may be introduced designedly in an effort to replenish the life of the water. Ordinarily, men have not attempted to do more than to plant fish, and usually have introduced them in young stages. It is, of course, worse than useless to do this until the food supply has been provided in one way or another, and any failure to consider this aspect of the question merely means that the fish which were introduced would starve to death and the experiment 36 New Yoek State be brought to an unfavorable end. Fortunateh one of the prominent elements of the water fauna replenishes it belt very rapidly. I refer to the insect larvae that in multitude-* inhabit different sorts of environment in our water bodies. First nv.d last they far exceed in variety any other group of animals found in the water. For the most part the adults live in the air, and are possessed of means of flight sufficient to distribute them over considerable areas. As soon as a bit of water becomes tenantable, there will be deposited in it by the flying adults the eggs which will yield in the appropriate time a supply of aquatic larvae. It is true, also, that the eggs of some insects will be deposited in the water even though it is not in condition to furnish them with a proper environment for develop- ment; this is an effort, as it were, to utilize all possibilities of exist- ence and to repopulate the given area before it has actually reached the condition in which existence is possible. BIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER BODIES Weed of Considering Entire Picture It seems worth while to review the general method of collecting data on stream conditions that should be pursued in actual field work. One cannot emphasize too strongly that a fair judgment concerning conditions can be obtained only by taking into considera- tion the entire picture which presents itself to the observer. Single elements of the aquatic situation may be modified by one circum- stance or another, and the student who relies upon any individual factor to determine the value and character of the water area will be frequently led astray. If one starts with the point at which the stream of waste empties into the natural water channel and follows down stream he will observe that, especially if the effluent is colored, it is easy to trace the gradual mixture of the waste with the stream water as it spreads itself towards the opposite bank as well as down stream. The bottom is often colored and the waste furnishes float- ing particles which, in addition to the color tone already mentioned, aid the observer in tracing the spread of its influence over the water body. These general appearances are readily followed at ordinary stages of water. They become very conspicuous during low water conditions, and are more or less concealed in times of high water or when the stream is turbid with the surface run off that is carried in after storms, One can follow out in the way just indicated the area brought under the influence of the effluent, and to determine the biological effect one turns next to the study of the living organ- isms within the area involved. It has been customary in the past to base conclusions upon observation of the fish themselves, but one should not and cannot place dependence upon this or any other single test object. As a means for determining the suitability of the water body for the existence of fish life and its favorableness for the multiplication of fish species, it is better to study the small organisms rather than the fish themselves. The fish are evidently less subject than are the smaller organisms to the control of the immediate environment and better able to change continuously 38 New Yobk Stvtb their position, as well as to undergo for a limited period unfavor- able conditions without really adapting themselves to the situation. For other reasons, also, study of the fish in the stream alone gives unreliable results. In response to the complaint that the pollution of streams has affected the abundance of fish life, it has often been urged that the real reason for the scarcity of the fish fauna is to be found in the multitude of fishermen and the methods that they follow, rather than in the unfavorable conditions of the aquatic environment. One hears strong arguments advanced in the effort to establish that contention, and it may well be true. In many regions the number of fishermen has increased beyond the possibility by natural methods of repro- duction to supply the draft upon the waters. Men have also caught more fish than was reasonable or legal, and have used nets, traps, dynamite and other means of obtaining fish to such an extent that the fish supply in certain waters has been reduced pretty nearly to zero. There are other factors also which tend to reduce at a given time the number of fish in a certain stream or pond. One may refer, first, to the migrations that fish carry out for reproductive purposes or in response to seasonal changes of water temperature and depth, as well as those which result from mechanical disturbances and from the addition of chemicals and wastes of various kinds. Hence to base any conclusion upon the number of fish which happen to be present in the particular region at a given point of time is evidently to run the risk of serious error. A stream may be well adapted to support fish life, and adequately supplied with the con- ditions necessary for the existence of the fish, even though it be entirely without, or nearly entirely without, a fish fauna. It is how- ever, not difficult to distinguish between those places in which the absence of fish may be due to the pollution of the stream and those other points at which the lack of a fish population is to be explained on some other basis. Natural Aquatic Life The method for distinguishing between such cases in general will be readily understood when one considers the general biological condition of the water. Each water body contains, under natural con- ditions, a varied assortment of living organisms, provided it furnishes the possibility of existence for the fish themselves. These other Streoe Poilction 39 organisms constitute the primary or secondary sources of food supply for the fish. Together they make up the biological complex of the water. Just as one would not expect to find large land animals in any region which was devoid of vegetation and smaller living organisms, and which presented to the eye nothing but an extended area of bare soil, so underneath the surface of the water one need not expect to find conditions light for fish existence if there are no other organisms present and no varied associations of living things, both plants and animals, to provide the food supply of the larger forms. And just as one can distinguish on the land between desert conditions which are primary and natural on the one hand, or secon- dary and created by untoward conditions on the other hand, so one may differentiate equally between the aquatic desert which is natural and represents a region unfitted for fish existence on one hand, and those conditions which are acquired and due to interference with natural conditions on the other hand. If the fish have all been caught off or driven away, then one would still find the smaller animals and plants, provided conditions of existence still remain favorable. But if the character of the water and the bottom have been so modified by the introduction of foreign materials that they no longer afford opportunity for the development of these smaller organisms, then by the absence of such forms of life one would demonstrate clearly and positively the fact that water has been rendered unfit for fish existence. Devastation on Land and in "Water One can furnish a ready example from the surface of the land to illustrate the point in mind. In the midst of wooded hills a forest fire has swept over a given area and reduced the land to bare soil, with perhaps fragments of half burned wood and ashes which soon disappear with the storms. The region stands out in sharp contrast with surrounding areas where the growth of plants and the presence of animals of various types indicate favorable conditions for exist- ence and the ability of the territory to support a varied population of living things. Under the surface of the water the same thing has taken place at certain points. The inflow of chemical wastes has driven away the fish, has eliminated oxygen from the water, has destroyed the smaller organisms, both the plant and animal, and has left either a waste or a highly specialized and peculiar chemical 40 Nkw Yotjk Rtvte environment in which onh certain strange types of living things can exist, namely those which have the power to perpetuate their existence tinder the unusual chemical conditions present. If we attempt to picture to ourselves similar conditions on the surface of the land, we see how imperfect would be conclusions formed in the same way that those regarding pollution are sometimes based upon observations concerning the occasional presence or the absence of fish. Jn an area devastated by forest fires one might frequently see wild* animals of \arious sorts on the land surface or flying in the air above it. Such movements might be in certain regions very common if the area involved was not large, and even where it was extensive the occurrence would be by no means peculiar. But it does not suggest to our minds that the territory itself is suited for the existence of these animals. In fact our eyes take in at once the general conditions. We note the soil stripped of vegetation, the evidences of the fire in ashes and charred fragments of wood, and despite the presence of occasional individuals of the higher types of animals, we never question the fact that the area has been devastated and its life wiped out. The situation may be duplicated very closely in the water. The fish are the largest, most powerful, and most active of all water living organisms. The larger game fish with which we are most familiar are the most active of all in their movements in search of food. Consequently, it cannot be too strongly contended that the presence or absence of these forms does not yield positive and adequate evidence with regard to the pollution of the stream or the general condition of the aquatic environment. Yet concerning streams that are under examination with reference to the quality of the waters, one frequently sees a statement to the effect that fish were seen at a given point or were swimming through a certain supposably polluted section. It is claimed, consequently, that though the appearance of the stream had been changed, the waste was not serious because fish were found in it and around it. Susceptibility of Fish In this connection it may be appropriate to call attention to the difference in susceptibility between different species of fish. While we are not in position to make an absolute statement on this point, it appears from recent published experiments by Wells and Shelforc? Stbeam Pollution 41 that fish vary widely in their resistance to pollution and in their indifference to the presence of waste materials in the water. Most of all, our valuable food fish are exceedingly sensitive, but some other fish continue to live, if not to thrive, under conditions in which certain sorts of pollution are very conspicuous. I include here a table taken from Wells (1918) which gives knowledge on this point. 42 New Yokk Stvpk TABLE OF RESISTANCE (After Wells) Indicating the relative resistance of the more common species of fishes to be taken in the waters of Northern Illinois, together with data as to the best type of ecological environment for each species. In column 2 the resistance of the least resistant species is arbitrarily taken to be unity. Species of Fish Labidesthes siceulus (Brooksilverside) ... . Etheostoma coeruleum (Rainbow darter) Moxostoma aureolum (Redhorse) Catostomus commersonii (Common sucker) .... Notropis atherinoides (Shiner) Semotilus atromaculatus (Horned dace) ....... Chrosomus erythrogaster (Red-bellied dace) Micropterus dolomieu (Small-mouthed black bass). Micropterus salmoides (Large-mouthed black bass). Pimephales notatus (Blunt-nosed minnow) Hybopsis kentuckiensis (River chub) Notropis cornutus (Common shiner) Pomoxis annularis (White crappie) Pomoxis sparoides (Black crappie, Calico bass) . . live re- sistance 2.3 i