T7^ HIZlfr CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF tSlE SAGE ENDOWMENT- FUND GIVEN IN 1 891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE PR 2955.H7B74T896'"'' '■"'™'^ 3 1924 013 155 126 Date Due lA i;0V>0rfii 68 „ili. ... 71 „iv. ... 72 V. v.— vii. . 73 Sich. II. I. i 77 >• II ii 84 II II iii 86 „iv.. . . . 89 „ II. i 91 „ „ ii. . . . 97 ,, „ iii. . . . 100 „ iv. . . . 102 III. i. . . . 104 „ ii. . . .106 „ „ iiL . . . 107 „ iv. . . . 110 ,1 IV. i. V. i. ... 120 „ „ ii.— iii. . . I, „ „ IT.— V, . . 124 „ Ti. ... 126 lBm.ir.l.i 130 „ iii. ... 133 lMm.IV.ll.m. . •I iv. ■ III. L . •I ii. . IV. i. . II ii- ■ II iii. • V. i. . „ ii.— iv. I, y. . 2ffen.IF.I.i. . . II iii. • II. iii. . Ill.i. . IV. i.— ii. II iii- - II iv- - ., V. . V. ii. . iiV. . aen. V. I. Prol. . i.i- II ii. - II. Chorus II ii. - II. iv. . III. Chorus „ i. . II iJ- . „ iii. . II V. . II VI. . „ vii. . IV. Chorus II i. . II ii- - 1 1 iii- • II iv. - » VI. . „ vii. . PAGE . 136 • fl . 137 . 139 . 142 , 143 144 147 148 149 150 II 155 156 158 161 164 165 167 168 173 II 177 179 M 180 n 182 183 185 186 187 188 189 191 192 Ben. r. IV. viii. . ,, V. Chorus II II ii- lSm.VI.lA. .. ii. 2 Hen. •I iii. Ill , iv. , — vi, II V. II. i, II ii- II iii- I, iv. II V. III. i. II ii- II Ml. „ iv. IV. i. II ii-— V. i. I. ii- •I iii- „iv. II V. ri.l.L . „ii. II iii- I. iv. II. i. II ii- II iii' „ iv. III. i. „ iL •I iii- IV. i. II ii- II iii- II iv. II V. -vii. PAGB ix xvii zziii . 195 . 197 . 199 . 205 . 209 . 212 . 213 . 215 . 216 . 217 . 218 . 219 . 220 . 224 . 226 . 228 . 230 . 234 . 236 . 237 . 238 . 241 . 242 . 248 • »l . 252 . 253 . 255 . 258 . 261 . 262 . 266 . 269 . 270 . 271 . 272 . 273 . 275 VIU PAGE 2 Sen. VI. W.yi. . . 275 „ ,, vii. . . . 276 „ „ yiii. . . 279 )> ), ix. . . 281 )) )) ^' . 283 „ V. i. . . 284 „ „ ii.— iii. . 288 3 Hen. VI. I.i. . . 289 J) )J ^' • . 295 „ „ iu. . . 297 „ iv. . . 298 „ II. i. . . 300 „ ii. . . 303 „ „ iii. . . 305 ! ) ) J V. . 306 >> >, vi. . . 307 III. i. . . 308 „ ii. . . 309 „ i". . . 312 „ IV. i. . . 318 ■ „ ii.— iii. . 322 „ iv. . . 324 )) )) V. . )) 11 ,, vi. . . . 326 ■ „ „ vii. . . 330 CONTENTS. FAOE PAOE Z Ben. VI.IY. Ym. . . . 332 Bich. III. IV. iii. . . . 394 „ V. i. . . . 333 II II iv. . . . 397 i> )> ii. . 337 J J )) '" • . . 406 » » iii. . )» „ V. L . . . 409 „ iv. . . 338 .. ii. • . 410 ,< .. V. . )J „iii. . ii )i 1. vi. . . 340 „ IV. . . 418 „ „ vii . . . 341 >> )) "^^ • J» Rich. in. I. i. . 343 Hen.VIII.l. i. . . . 424 .) >. ii. . 345 „ „ ii. . 431 „ „ iii. . 346 II iii. . . 439 ,. ,. iv. . 348 II II iv. . . 440 „ II. i. . * JJ II. i. . . 446 >> ii- . . 350 » ii. . . 454 „ iii. . . 353 „ iii. . . 455 ,. IV. . )» II iv. . Ii III. i. . . 356 III. i. . . 466 J) )J II' • . 362 ,1 ii. . . 469 „ „ iii. • . 368 „ IV. i. . . 482 ,, » iv. . >) II ii. • . 487 j> )) ^; • . 373 II V. i. . . 493 )j )) vi« • . 376 ,1 ii. • . 498 ,, vii.. . 377 ji ., iii. ■ . 499 „ IV. i. . . , 386 >4 . 91 V. . . .505 ) ) ) J ^. . ■ . 387 PREFACE. AboTTT the compiler of the chronicles whence most of the historical excerpts in this book have been taken, w6 know nothing save what his will reveals. He there described himself as "Raphael HoUynshed of Bromecote [Bramcott] in the County of "Warr[wick] " ; and bequeathed all his property to "Thomas Burdett of Bromecote aforesaid Esq.," whom he calls "my Master." The will was made on October 1, 1578, and proved on April 24, 1582.^ The first edition of Holinshed's Chronicles appeared in 1577. John Hooker alias Vowell, Abraham Fleming, Francis Thynne, and others, produced a second edition, bringing down the English annals to January, 1587. In this second edition the text was altered or modernized,^ and many new passages were added. The historical authority used for some of the plays (when other works were not consulted) was apparently the second edition of Holinshed. In the subjoined parallel columns certain different readings of the two editions are collated, and a few enlargements of the second edition are noted. The left-hand column's references indicate the pages of this book, where the later readings or fresh matter will be found. The right-hand column gives references to the plays which have readings identical with or like the readings presented by the text of the second edition, or which embody matter added to that edition. 1 Caxaien's Antuds, I. cxlix, cl. For conjectures touching Holinshed's kindred, see the Dictiona/ry of National Biography, under his name. 2 In the story of Lear more than a dozen textual changes were made. I give two examples: that you ha/ue dlvxms borne towwds me] ed. 2 (p. 3 helow). that tovnrds me you haue aVways home ed. 1. — acmslie\ ed. 2 (p. 4 below), vnneth ed. 1. PREFACE. HOLINSHBD, ed. 2. wUd] p. 23. In this years . . . imhnowne euenf] p. 103. picM?ianks] p. 140. In this years . . , to be seene.'\ p. 158. alledge easr against the Icings of Englamd in larre of their iust title] p. 169. dishonest] p. 169. who vsurped] p. 170. Numbers] p. 171. should shake the wailes of the best court in France, p. 173. desolatioTC] p. 177. offenses] p. 177. die yowr tawnis ground viUh your red blond.] p. 185. In time of this siege . . . here- after followeth.] pp. 210- 212. forhi/r pranks . . . and vritches.] pp. 238, 239. Edward the third . . .his grand- sire; . . .] p. 256. Zionell tlie third . . . died with- out issue.] p. 257. And the said . . . same Edward.] p. 258. a taper in hir hand.] p. 261. created the lord Thomas. . .saint Edwards dmrriber.] p. 347. wishing and . . , casting away.] p. 410. The oration . , . his armie.] p. 414. The oration . . . his armie.] p. 416. moothers meanes, . . .] p. 417. HOLINSHED, ed. 1. ferly Not in ed. 1. alledge to defeate the Kyngs of Engla/nd of their iust . . . title mihonest which vsurped Nwmeri shoulde brealce amd batter downe the roofes of his houses about I7ot in ed. 1. make red your tawny ground with the effusion of christian bloud. Not in ed. 1. brothers meanes Play. wilde] Maeb. I. iii. 40. Rich. II., II. iv. 8. 1 Hen. IV., III. ii. 25. 2 Hen. IV., IV. iv. 125. There is no barre To make against ymi/r High- nesse claime] Hen. V., I. ii. 34, 35. dishonest] Hen. V., I. ii. 49. who vswpt] Hen. V., I. ii. 69. Numbers] Hen. V., I. ii. 98. That all the Cov/rts of France will be distwb'd] Hen. V., I. ii. 265. desolation] Hen. V., II. ii. 173. offenses] Hen. V., II. ii. 181. We shall your tawny grovmd with your red blood Discolour: . . .] Hen. V., III. vi. 170, 171. 1 Hen. VI., I. ii. 1 Hen. VI., V. iv. 2 Hen. VI., II. ii. 10-20. 2 Hen. VI., II. ii. 34-38. 2 Hen. VI., II. ii. 44-52. 2 Hen. VI., II. iv. 16 (S. D.). Rich. III., I. iii. 255, 256. Rich. IIL.V. ii. 20, 21. Rich. III., V. iii. 236 (S. D.). Rich. III., V. iii. 313 (S. D. inQq.). MotJiers cost}] Rich. III., V, iii. 324. The second edition of Holinshed must have been employed for those parts of ffewy VIII. which are based on Cavendish's Life of Wolsey ; if the dramatist did not resort directly to Stow, in whose Chronicles of Englavd (1580) selections from this biography were first published. With regard to the wider question of sources, the reader will find that, in Lear, Gymheline, and the historical plays preceding 1 Henry VI., most of the borrowed action and dialogue can be illustrated by excerpts from Holinshed, Passages in the following plays — not traceable to Holinshed — are compared with other likely sources at the references given below: John (pp. 48-51); Richard II. (p. 118); 1 Ren. IV. (pp. PREFACE. xi 139 n. 2, 141 n. 2) ; 2 Sen. IV. (p. 163) ; mn. V. (pp. 172, 173 n. 1, 185 n. 3, 186, 188). As most of the quotations from Holinshed, illustrating the three Parts of Henry VI., are paraphrases of Halle, it is generally impossible to determine which of these authorities was used, and I have therefore in such cases added a reference to the latter chronicler. But, when Halle alone is cited, the reader will understand that the subsequent excerpt is not paraphrased or copied in the second edition of Holinshed.^ It is clear that the dramatist of The First Part of Henry VI. availed himself of accounts of Jeanne Dare, given by Holmshed (see pp. 210-212, 238, 239), which are not in Halle ; and we may conjecture that Holinshed's paraphrase of Halle was the source of 1 Hen. VI., V. i. 5, 6. In the passage illustrating these lines (p. 234 below), both editions of Holinshed read peace for concorde. Holinshed has : " exhorting them ... to conforme themselues to reason, ... so that, in concluding a godlie peace, they might receiue profit and quietnesse heere in this world," &c. The equivalent words of Halle are : "exhorting . . . them, . . . that they would . . . conforme themselfes to reason, and to Godly concorde, by the whiche they should receaue honor, profite, and continuall quietnesse in the worlde," &c. LI. 83 and 95, 96, Act III. sc. ii. (pp. 225, 226), were probably derived from Holinshed. Fabyan may have yielded some details in Act I. sc. iii. (p. 213), Act III. sc. i. (p. 221), and Act III. sc. ii. (p. 225). LI. 61-71, Act IV. sc. vii. (p. 233), were copied from an epitaph published by Crompton and Brooke in 1599 and 1619, respectively.^ The reviser who turned The Contention into The Second Part of Henry VI. was indebted to Holinshed or Stow for York's full pedigree ^ (pp. 256- 268). Amalgamated with the dramatic version of Cade's revolt are many particulars — recorded by these chroniclers — of the villeins' outbreak in the reign of Richard IL (pp. 271, 272, 272 n. 2, 273 n. 4, 277, 278). Eecourse to Holinshed (p. 251) is indicated by 11. 163, 164, Act I. sc. iii. ; and a hint for the Entry at Act II. sc. iv. 1. 16, was probably taken from his chronicle (p. 261). The excerpts from Holinshed (pp. 246-249, 281), and from Stow (pp. 253, 261), may be regarded as possible sources of the play both in its » IToZJfi, 256 ("This deadly," &c., p. 306), the last clause of SaJie, 293 (p. 334) — including the words "periured duke," — and B. The original black-letter sidenotes liave been set in italic. A few words — for example, Beqvdem (p. 128 below) — ^have been left in the original italic. Italic has been substituted for the Boman type which, in copies of Holinshed, distinguish writers' names — for example, Galfrid (p. 14) — ^from the black-letter text. AUTHORITIES REFERRED TO IN THIS BOOK. An asterisk (*) indicates that an authority is contemporaneous or nearly contemporaneous with the event related below. A dash (— ) precedes the last date of an authority, when the first year IS not given. * Arm. Bwrton. Annales de Burton. 1004—1263. H. R. Luard. (Chronicles and Memorials of Great Britain and Ireland during the Middle Ages. Annales Monastici. Vol. 1.) * Arm. Ihmelm. Annales Dunelmenses. 995—1199. G. H. Pertz. (Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Vol. 19.) * Ann. Mwrg. Annales de Margan. 1066—1232. H. R. Luard. (Ohron. and Mem. Annales Monastici. Vol. 1.) * Arm. B. II. — S. IV. Annales Ricardi Secundi et Heniici Quarti. 1392 — 1406. H. T. Riley. (Chron. and Mem. Chronica Monasterii S. Albani. Vol. 4.) * Arm. Theok. Annales de Theokesberia. 1066—1263. H. R. Luard. (Chron. and Mem. Annales Monastici. Vol. 1.) * Arm. Wmerl. Annales de jWaverleia. 1—1291. H. R. Luard. (Ohron. and Mem. Annales Monastici. Vol. 2.) Ansdme. Anselme de la Vierge Marie [P. de Gibours]. Histoire g^n^alogique et chronologique de la Maison Royale dcrFrance, &e., continuSe par M. Du Foumy. 1726—1733. Arehaeol. Archaeologia ; or, Miscellaneous Tracts relating to Antiquity, published by the Society of Antiquaries of London. Vol. 20. Arnold. Chronicle of the Customs of London. R. Arnold. (?) 1502. F. Douce. 1811. * Arrived,. Historie of the Arrival! of Edward IV. in England and the finall recouerye of his kingdomes from Henry VI. a.D. M.CCCC.LXXI. J. Bruce. (Camden Society, No. 1.) * AS. Chron. (M. H. B.). The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. 1—1154. H. Petrie and J. Sharpe. (Monumenta Historica Britannica. — 1066.) * Aveshury. Roberti de Avesbury Historia de MirabUibus Gestis Edwardi III. 1308—1356. T. Heame. 1720. BaeovbS Mervry VII. The History of the Reign of King Henry the Seventh, F. Bacon. 1622. J. R. Lumby. 1889. (Cambridge University Press.) Cited by page and first line. Bartholomew. Gazetteer of the British Isles. J. Bartholomew. 1887. * Beehington's Embassy. Journal of Bishop Beckington's Embassy in 1442. N. H. Nicolas. 1828. h Xviii AUTHOEITIES EEFEEREt) TO IN THIS BOOK. * Benedict. Gesta Eegis Henrioi Secundi Benedicti Abbatis. 1169—1192. W. Stubbs. (Chion. and Mem.) Boece. Scotorum Historiae. —1460. H. Boece. 1575. Continued by Giovanni Ferrerio, in this 2nd ed., to the year 1488. Brewer. The Reign of Henry VIII. J. S. Brewer. 1884. * Calenda/r (Hen. VIIL). Calendar of State Papers of the Reign of Henry VIII. J. S. Brewer and J. Gairdner. (Chron. and Mem.) Cited by volume, part, and numbered document. When p. precedes numerals, the reference is to the page. * Galend. RB. PP. Calendarium Rotulorum Patentium. 1201—1483. (Record Commissioners' Publications.) Camden's Amials. Guilielmi Camdeni Annales Rerum Anglicarum et Hibemicarum regnante Elizabetha. T. Heame. 1717. * GcmendAsh. The Life of Cardinal Wolsey. G. Cavendish. S. W. Singer. 1825. Cavendish was Wolsey's gentleman usher. * Gh/i'on. AiMt. Ign. Chronioon Eerum Gestarum in Monasterio S. Albani, (a.d. 1422—1431,) a quodam auctore ignoto compilatum. R. T. Eiley. (Chron. and Mem. Annales Monasterii S. Albani, a Johanne Amundesham, Monacho, ut videtur, consoripti. Vol. 1.) * Chron. de la Piwdle. Chronique de la Pucelle. 1422 — 1429. G. Cousinot de Montreuil. J. A. Buchon. (Collection des Chroniques Nationales Fran9oises.) * Chron. Giles. Incerti Scriptoris Chronicon Angliae. 1399 — 1455. J. A. Giles. 1848. Cited by paginal references to the three Parts, which contain the respective reigns of Henry IV., V., and VI. * Chron. Land. A Chronicle of London. 1089—1483. N. H. Nicolas. 1827. * Chron. Normamde. Chronique de la Pucelle . . . suivie de la Chronique Normande de P. Cochon. 1403—1430. Vallet de Viriville. 1859. * Chron. Rich. II. — Hen. VI. A Chronicle of the Reigns of Richard II., Henry IV., v., and VI. 1377—1461. J. S. Davies. (Camden Society, No. 64.) * Goggeshall. Radulphi de Coggeshall Chronioon Anglicanum. 1066 — 1225. J. Stevenson. (Chron. and Mem.) The last event recorded by Coggeshall (the banishment of Fawkes de Breautd) took place in 1225. — M. Paris {Wendover^, iii. 94. Collins. The Peerage of England. A. Collins. 1714. * Oont. Croyl. Alia Historiae Croylandensis Continuatio. 1459—1485. T. Gale and W. Fulman. 1684. (Scriptores Rerum Anglicarum. Vol. 1.) Contention. The First part of the Contention betwixt the two famous Houses of Yorke and Lancaster. 1594. F. J. Furnivall. 1889. (Shakspere Quarto Fac-similes.) * Creton. {Archaeol.). 1399 — 1401. Archaeologia, vol. xx. (references to French text and translation), contains the narrative of Creton, a Frenchman, who accompanied Richard II. to Ireland in 1399, and returned with him. Creton gives an account (from hearsay) of Isabelle's return to France in 1401. — Archaeol. xx. 226 ; 416. D. K. Bep. 3. Third Report of the Deputy Keeper of the Records. * De Coussy. Chroniques de Mathieu de Coussy (d'Escouchy). 1444 — 1461. J. A. Buchon. (Collection des Chroniques Nationales Fran9oises.) * Diceto. Radulphi de Diceto Decani Lundoniensis Opera Historica. Ymagines Historiarum. 1148—1202. W. Stubbs. (Chron. and Mem.) Doyle. The Ofacial Baronage of England. J. E. Doyle. 1886. * Du Olercq. M^moires de Jacques du Clercq. 1448—1467. J. A. Buchon.' (Collection des Chroniques Nationales Frangoises.) Diigdale. The Baronage of England. W. Dugdale. 1675—1676. AUTHORITIES REPEBRED TO IN THIS BOOK. xix Edward III. King EdwaJd III. Doubtful Plays of William Shakespeare. Max Moltke. 1869. Tauohnitz. Vol. 1041. Siton (p. .154 below). Thomas Otterbourne. See OU. * Ellis. Original Letters illustrative of English History, H. Ellis. 1825—1846. Cited by series, volume, and page. * Mmham. Thomas de Elmham Vita et Gesta Henrici Quinti, Anglorum Begis. 1388—1422. T. Heame. 1727. Escouohy, Mathieu d'. See De Goussy. * Eidog. Eulogium Historiarum. Vol. III. 1364—1413. F. S. Haydon. (Chron. and Mem.) * Eves. Monaehi de Evesham Historia Vitae et Regni Bicardi II. 1377 — 1402. T. Heame. 1729. * Excerpta Historica. Excerpta Historica, or, Illustrations of English History. S. Bentley. 1831. * Exchequer Issiies. Issues of the Exchequer. F. Devon. 1837. (Record Commissioners' Publications.) Fah. The New Chronicles of England and France. —1495. B. Fabyan. 1516. H. EUis. 1811. (Read with the ed. of 1516. The irregular capital letters have as far as possible been retained.) Fabyan's will was proved on July 12, 1513. Famovs Victories. The Famovs Victories of Henry the fifth. 1598. P. A. Daniel. 1887. (Shakspere Quarto Fae-simUes.) Fordnm. Joannis de Fordun Scotichronioon. W. Goodall. 1759. Fordun wrote after 1377 j see Scotichronioon, ed. Goodall, XI. xiv. 151, note. (Cited by book, chapter, and page.) Foxe. Actes and Monumentes of the Churche. J. Foxe. 1576. Cited by page and column. Frendi. Shakspeareana Genealogica. G. R. French. 1869. * Frois. Chroniques de Jean Froissart. 1327 — 1400. J. A. Buchon. (Collection des Chroniques Nationales Frangoises.) Gent. Mag. Gentleman's Magazine. First issued in 1731. * Oesta. Henrici Quinti, Angliae Regis, Gesta. 1413 — 1416. B. Williams. (English Historical Society.) Written by a chaplain of Henry V., about 1418 ; see Gesta, 5. The work was continued to 1422. GodAJoin. A Catalogue of the Bishops of England. F. Godwin. 1615. Grafton. A Chronicle at large, and meere history of the affayres of Englande, &c. —1568. B. Grafton. Ed. 1809. (Read with the ed. of 1569.) * Grafts. Grants from the Crown temp. Edward V. J. G. Nichols. (Camden Society, No. 60.) * Greg. Gregory's Chronicle. 1189 — 1469. Historical Collections of a Citizen of London in the Fifteenth Century. J. Gairdner. (Camden Society, N. S. No. 17.) W. Gregory's will was proved on Jan. 23, 1467. Another chronicler recorded events down to 1469, in which year the work ends abruptly. EaXle. The Vnion of the two noble and illustre famelies of Lancastre and Yorke, &c. — 1398 — 1547. E. Halle. 1550. (I have quoted the text of 1550, and given paginal references to the ed. of HaUe's Chronicle published in 1809.) Hard/yng. The Chronicle of lohn Hardyng. —1461. H. Ellis. 1812. (Read with the ed. of 1543, entitled : " The chronicle of lohn Hardyng in metre," &c.) Hardyng was bom in 1378 (Hard/yng 351), and was writing in 1463 {lb. 410). Ha/rd/yng-Grafton. A Continnacion of the Chronicle of England, begynnyng wher XX AUTHORITIES EBFERRED TO IN THIS BOOK. John Hardyng left, &c. 1461—1543. R. Grafton. 1543. H. Ellis. 1812. (Read with the continuation of " The chronicle of John Hardyng in metre," &c.) Eenr. Hunt. (M. H. B.). Henrici Aichidiaconi Huntendunensis Historiae Anglorum Libri Octo. — 1154. (Monumenta Historica Britannica. — 1066.) Hist. Britt. Galfredi Monumetensis Historia Britonum. J. A. Gilea. (Caxton Society.) Geoffrey's dedication of Hist. Britt. was written before 1147. * Hoveden. Chronica Magistri Rogeri de Houedene. 732 — 1201. W. Stubbs. (Chron. and Mem.) * Iti/nerariwrn. Itineraria Symonis Simeonis et Willelmi de Worcester. J. Nasmith. 1778. * Itinera/ry. Itinerary of King John. T. D. Hardy. 1835. (With Hardy's Description of the Patent Rolls, one of the Record Commissioners' Publications.) * Jecm de Troyes. Chronique de Jean de Troyes. 1460 — 1483. C. B. Petitot. (Collection Complete des M^moires relatifs a I'Histoire de France. Premifere S6rie. Tome 14.) * Journal. Journal d'un Bourgeois de Paris. 1409 — 1449. J. A. Buchon. (Col- lection des Chronique Nationales Frangoises.) * Juv. Histoire de Charles VI. 1380 — 1422. Jean Juvenal des Ursins. D. Godefroy. 1653. Lewis. A Topographical Dictionary of England. S. Lewis. 1833. * Livius. Titi Livii Foro-Juliensis Vita Henrici Quinti, Regis Angliae. 1388 — 1422. T. Heame. 1716. The closing words of this life (95) show that Livius wrote after Gloucester's resignation of the Protectorate in 1429, and before the Duke's death in 1447. Lords' Jowmals. Calendar of the Journals of the House of Lords. M. H. B. Monumenta Historica Britannica. H. Petrie and J. Sharpe. 1848. * M. Paris (Wendover). Matthaei Parisiensis, Monachi Sancti Albani, Chronica Majora. Vol. IL 1067—1216. H. R. Luard. (Chron. and Mem.) Roger of Wend- over's chronicles were revised and augmented by Matthew Paris, and continued by the latter from 1235 to 1259. * M. Scottus (Pei-fe). Mariani Scotti Chronicon. 1 — 1082. G. Waitz. (Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Vol. 5. G. H. Pertz was the general editor of M. G. H.) Marianus Scottus was born in 1028 and died in 1082. * Mans. Chroniques d'Enguerrand de Monstrelet. 1400 — 1444. J. A. Buchon. (Collection des Chroniques Nationales Frangoises.) More. The history of King Richard the thirde. T. More. 1513. J. R. Lumby. 1883. (Cambridge University Press.) Cited by page and first line in the ed. of 1883. Read with the text printed in More's Workes, 1557. From the title we learn that More wrote this book about 1513, but its authorship has been attributed to Cardinal Morton, who died iu 1500. * OU. Duo Rerum Anglicarum Seriptores Veteres, viz. Thomas Otterboume et Johannes Whethamstede. Ott. —1420. * Wheth. 1455—1461. T. Heame. 1732. * Page. Poem on the siege of Rouen. J. Page. Historical Collections of a Citizen of London in the Fifteenth Century. J. Gairdner. (Camden Society, N. S. No. 17.) Page was present at the siege (1). * Paston. The Paston Letters. 1422—1509. J. Gairdner. 1872—1875. (Arber's Annotated Reprints.) * Pol. Poems. Political Poems and Songs relating to English History. T. Wright. (Chron. and Mem.) Polyd. Verg. Polydori Vergilii Anglicae Historiae Libri XXVII. (a.c. 55— a.d. AUTHORITIES EEPERRED TO IN THIS BOOK. XXI 1537.) Basileae. 1555. Cited by page and first line. His first work, Proverhiorum Lihdlus, was published in 1498. He died before 1555. * Procfe. Ohronique et Proofes de la Pucelle d'Orl^ans. J. A. Biichon. (Collection des Clironiques Nationales Frangoises.) * Proc. Priv. Co. Proceedings and Ordinances of the Privy Council of England. N. H. Nicolas. 1834 — 1837. (Record Commissioners' Publications.) Qwieherat. Procfes de Condamnation et de Rehabilitation de Jeanne d'Arc. Jules Quieherat. 1841—1849. (Soci6t6 de I'Histoire de France.) Bedman. Vita Henrici V. Roberto Redmanno auctore. 1413 — 1422. C. A. Cole. (Chron. and Mem.) "Written between 1536 and 1544. Beg. Sacr. Angl. Registrum Sacrum Anglicanum. An attempt to exhibit the course of Episcopal Succession in England. W. Stubbs. 1858. * Bot. Pa/rl. Rotuli Parliamentorum. Vols. III. — VI. Cited by page, and column or section. (Record Commissioners' Publications.) * Bous. Jonnnis Rossi Antiquarii Warwicensis Historia Regum Angliae. — 1485. T. Heame. 1745 (ed. 2). Rous died in 1491. Bows Bol. The Roll of the "Warwick Family. J. Rows. W. Courthope. 1845. * Bymer. Foedera, Conventiones, Literae, et alia Acta Publica inter Reges Angliae et alios Principes. T. Rymer. 1704^-1735. * St. Dem/s. Chronique du Religieux de Saint-Denys. 1380 — 1422. M. L. Bellagnet. (Collection de Documents In^dits sur I'Histoire de France.) * Saint-Bemy. M^moires de Jean Lefevre, Seigneur de Saint-Remy. 1407 — 1435. J. A. Buohon. (Collection des Chroniques Nationales Frangoises.) Sandford. A Genealogical History of the Kings and Queens of England, . . . From the Conquest ... to the year 1707. F. Sandford. S. Stebbins. 1707. * S&mces du GonseU de Charles VIII. Procfes-Verbaux des stances du Conseil de Rdgence du Roi Charles VIII. pendant les mois d'aoftt 1484 li Janvier 1485. A. Bernier. (Collection de Documents InMita sur I'Histoire de France.) Solly-Flood. The Story of Prince Henry of Monmouth and Chief-Justice Gascoign. F. Solly-Flood. 1886. CTransactions of the Royal Historical Society. Vol. 3. Part 1.) * Statutes. The Statutes of the Realm, . . . from Magna Charta to the end of the reign of Queen Anne. 1810—1828. * Stevenson. Letters and Papers illustrative of the "Wars of the English in France during the Reign of Henry the Sixth, King of England. J. Stevenson. (Chron. and Mem.) Stow. The Annales of England . . . vntUl this present yeare 1605. J. Stow. Strype^s Grommer. Memorials of . . . Thomas Cranmer, . . . Archbishop of Canter- bury. J. Strype. P. E. Barnes. 1840. T.-A. Time- Analysis of the Plots of Shakspere's Plays. P. A. Daniel. (The New Shakspere Society's Transactions. 1877—1879.) * Three Chronides. Three Fifteenth-Century Chronicles. J. Gairdner. (Camden Society, N. S. No. 28.) Two of these chronicles are cited thus : S. E. C. = A Short English Chronicle, and B. L. 0. = A Brief Latin Chronicle. The former ends in 1465, the latter embraces the period 1422 — 1471. * Tighernac (Skene). Annals of Tighernao. —1088. Chronicles of the Picts, . . . and other early Memorials of Scottish History. "W. F. Skene. (Ohroniolea and Memorials of Scotland.) T. B. The Troublesome Raigne of lohn King of England. Two Parts. 1591. F. J. Furnivall. 1888. (Shakspere Quarto Fac-similes.) xxii AUTHORITIES RBPBERED TO IN THIS BOOK. * Trots. Chronique de la Traison et la Mort de Elehard Deux. 1398 — 1400. B. Williams. (English Historical Society.) Eeferences to French text and translation. T. T. The True Tragedie of Richard Duke of Yorke, and the death of good King Henrie the Sixt. 1595. T. Tyler. 1891. (Shakspere Quarto Fac-similes.) *Usk. Chronioon Adae de Usk. 1377—1404. E.M.Thompson. 1876. References to Latin text and translation. Few. j8?i. The Plays and Poems of William Shakspeare. E. Malone and J. Boswell. 1821. * Few. State PP. Calendar of State Papers relating to English Affairs in the Archives of Venice. Eawdon Brown. (Ohron. and Mem.) Wake. State of the Church and Clergy of England. W. Wake. 1703. * Wals. Thomae Walsingham Historia Anglicana. 1272—1422. H. T. Riley. (Chron. and Mem. Chronica Monasterii S. Albani.) * Watrkw. A Chronicle of the first thirteen years of King Edward the Fourth. 1461—1474. J. Warkworth. J. 0. Halliwell. (Camden Society, No. 10.) * Wwwrin. Recueil des Croniques . . . de la Grant Bretaigne, . . . par lehan de Waurin. — a.d. 1471. W. Hardy and E. L. Hardy. (Chron. and Mem.) Cited by volume, book, and page. TFeewr. Ancient Funeral Monuments of Great Britain, Ireland, and the Islands. J. Weever. 1767. Wheth. See Ott. Whole Gontention. The Whole Contention betweene the two Famous Houses, Lancaster and Yorke. Two Parts. Q 3. 1619. F. J. FumivaU. 1886. (Shakspere Quarto Fac-similes.) Wylie. History of England under Henry the Fourth. J. H. Wylie. 1884 — 1896. Wyntown. The Orygynale Cronykil of Scotland. A. Wyntown. —1420. D. Macpherson. 1795. * Wyrc. Wilhelmi Worcestrii Annales Rernm Angliearum. 1324 — 1468. T. Heame. 1774. (Liber Niger Scaccarii, &c. Vol. 2.) * York Becords. Extracts from the Municipal Records of the City of York, during the reigns of Edward IV., Edward V., and Richard III. R. Davies. 1843. CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS. Page 15, line 18, for Loncart retwi Loncarty „ 29, „ 4 from foot, for Loncart read Loncarty „ 41, „ 2fromfoot,/or 1092 read 1093 „ 85, „ 1, for same read fame „ 90, „ 6, /or lohn Bagot retwJ William Bagot „ 118,last line but one. "Kichard, King of the Majoroas"(ilf(iyoi'«!antm) is unknown in history. Kichard II.'s godfather was James, titular King of Majorca. — Froisswrt, ed. Buchon (Pantheon Litt4raire), i. 521. This James, son of James II. King of Majorca, was the third husband of Joanna I., Queen of Naples. Page 122, line 3 from foot, for Hugh read Thomas „ 135, „ 20, for brother read cousin. See pedigree of Scrope in Wylie, ii. 197. Page 150, line 3, for Dauid lord Flepiing read Sir Dauid Fleming „ 159, „ 17, delete as Fabyan asserts. See his words at 160 n 1 below. „ 176, „ 3of note 1, /or 1584 read 1585 „ 182, „ 19, vnfought withaU. Cp. Hen. V. III. v. 2, 12. „ 186, „ 2 of note 1, for qu6d read quod „ 210, „ 14. Glansdale. So Fi. Glasdale may be the right form. In a list of captains of Norman towns (dated 1417) occurs the name of " William Glasdall Esquier."— above all others ; the two elder sware deeply they would j the youaft^t, but the wisest, told her Father, without flattery, ' That albeit she did fi)fe honour, and reverence him, and so would whilst she lived, as mu&h as duty and daughterly love at the uttermost could expeet^ yet she did think that one I. KING LEAK. 3 Gonorilla the eldest, how well she loued him: who calling hir Atnaiiof gods to record, protested that she loTied him more than hir owne [The answer of the eldest life, which by right and reason should be most deere vnto hir. "laoBiite'-' With which answer the father being weU pleased, turned to the second, and demanded of hir how well she loued him: who answered (confirmiDg hir saiengs with great othea) that she loued Ke'JeS him more ihan toong could expresse, and ferre aboue all other '^*'^""' creatures of the world. Then called he his yoongest daughter Cordeilla before him, ^''^e""""" and asked of hir what account she made of him, vnto whome she £^^. made this answer as foUoweth: "Knowing tiie great loue and "fatherlie zeale that you haue alwaies borne towards me (for the " which I male not answere you otherwise than I thinke> and as " my conscience leadeth me) I protest vnto you, that I haue loued "you ever, and will Gooitinuallie (while I liue) loud you as my " naturall father, ^d if you would more vnderstand of the loue "that I beare you, assertaine your selfe, that so much as you " haue, so much you are worth, and so jcnuch I l^ue you, and no "more." The father being nothing ccmtent with this answer, f^^' married his two eldest daughters* the one vnto Henninus the duke ^^^^ of Comewall, and the other vnto Maglanus the duke of Albania,^ ^wSedto" betwixt whome he willed and ordeined that his laud should be damrutrt. diuided after his death, and the one halfe tiiereof immedia.tlie should be assigned to them in hand : but for the third daughter XDordeilla he rescued nothing. Keuertheless it fortuned that one of the princes of Gallia day it would come to pass that she should aflfect another more fervently,' meanmg her Husband, ' when she was mamed, who, being made one flesh wiji^ her, as God by commandement had told, and nature had taught her, she was to cleave fast to, forsaking Father and Mother, kiffe and kin.'" — Camden's Bemains eoMCefwma MHtmn, 1674, ander "Wise Speeches" (Library of Old Authors, pp. 254, ^5). * " The third and last part of the Hand he [Brute] allotted vnto Albanaei his yoongest sonne. . . . Thie laiter pareell at the first, tooke the name of Albanactus, who called it Albania. But now a small portion anelie of the region (being vnder the regiment af a duke) reteineth me said denomination, the rest being called Scotland, of celteine Soots that came ouer from Ireland to inhabit in those quarters. It is diuided from Lhoegres pingland] also by the Solue and the Firth, yet some doo note the Humber ; so that Albania (as Brute left it) conteined aU the north part of the Hand that is to be found beyond the aforesaid streame, vnto the point of Cathnesse.^' — Harrieon's DescrijpUon ^Britmn (in Mol. L II6/2/4). 4 I. KING LEAR. fA^pp^s (which now is called France) whose name was Aganippus, hearing deS'^Leir of the bcautie, womanhood, and good conditions of the said her no*'™ Cordcilla, desired to haue hir in manage, and sent ouer to hir father, requiring that he might haue hir to wife : to whome answer was made, that he might haue his daughter, but as for anie dower he could haue none, for all was promised and assured to hir other ^fedhCT] sis*6''s alreadie. Aganippus notwithstanding this answer of deniall to receiue anie thing by way of dower with Cordeilla, tooke hir to wife, onlie moued thereto (I sale) for respect of hir person and mm^ amiable vertues. This Aganippus was one of the twelue kings oM^as that ruled Gallia in those dales, as in the British historic it is laith. recorded. But to proceed. fLeir-s sons- After that Lcir was fallen into age, the two dukes that had in-law rebel ° ^"^Is^" mS'^ried his two eldest daughters, thinking it long yer the gouern- wmto^uve ™ent of the land did come to their hands, arose against him in ""■^ armour, and reft from him the gouernance of the land, vpon conditions to be continued for terme of life : by the which he was put to his portion, that is, to line after a rate assigned to him for the maintenance of his estate, which in processe of time was tThennkind- diminished as well by Maglanus as by Henninus. But the wh°n"e" greatest griefe that Leir tooke, was to see the vnkindnesse of Sem.*They ^ daughters, which seemed to thinke that all was too much ^oTum which their father had, the same being neuer so little : in so much at last] that going from the one to the other, he was brought to that miserie, that scarslie they would allow him one seruant to wait vpon him.i In the end, such was the vnkindnesse, or (as I male sale) the vnnaturalnesse which he found in his two daughters, notwithstand- 1 We learn from Hist. Britt. II. xii. 31 that, after the duke's revolt, Albany maintained Lear and a retinue of sixty knights. But, when two years had elapsed, "indignata est Qonorilla fiUa ob muUil/udme'm rrvUiUvm ejiis, qv/i eoTwicia mmisbris mfereba/nt, quia eis profusior epinomla non praebebatvir '' (cp. Lear, I. iv. 220-224; 262-267). Albany reduced ' Lear's attendance 'to thirty knights. Lear then went to live with Cornwall, but strife broke out between the retainers of the several households, and Regan dismissed all save five of Lear's knights. He returned to Gonorilla, who allowed him one knight. This last wrong caused Lear's departure to France. The Mirowr for Magistrates mentions the successive reductions of Lear's followers ; but none of the sources which I have enumerated above has aught to say about the dissensions between Lear's knights and his son?-in-laws' households, I. KING LEAR, 5 ing their faire and pleasant words vttered in time past, that Being [He fiees to . • in ..iniiiin , Cordeilla,in constreined of necessitie, he fled the land, & sailed into Gallia, Qaiua, and _ .' IS kindly there to seeke some comfort of his yongest daughter Cordeilla, ""«'™''-J whom before time he hated. The ladie Cordeilla hearing that he was arriued in poore estate, she first sent to him priuilie a certeine summe of monie to apparell himselfe withaU, and to reteine a certeine number of seruants that might attend vpon him in honorable wise, as apperteined to the estate which he had borne : and then so accompanied, she appointed him to come to the court, which he did, and was so ioifullie, honorablie, and louinglie receiued, both by his sonne in law Aganippus, and also by his daughter Cordeilla, that his hart was ^eatlie comforted : for he was no lesse honored, than if he had beene king of the whole countrie himselfe. I f Now when he had informed his sonne in la\^ and his daughter [Aganippus ^ ° prepared a in what sort he had beene vsed by his other daughters, Aganippus SJI^a™^ caused a mightie armie to be put in a readiaesse, and likewise ^S'to''"*' a great nauie of ships to be rigged, to passe ouer into Britaine to us'king-'^ with Leir his father in law, to see him againe restored to his kingdome. It was accorded, that Cordeilla should also go with him to take possession of the land, the which he promised to [Leir makes ^ _ _ '^ Cordeilla his leane vnto hir, as the rightftdl inheritour after his decesse, not- sole heiress.] withstanding any former grant made to hir sisters or to their husbands in anie maner of wise. Herevpon, when this armie and nauie of ships were readie, [Leir and .1,11111 Cordeilla Leir and his daughter Cordeilla with hir husband tooke the sea, ^?^ ?,''*"'' and arriuing in Britaine, fought with their enimies, and dis- ^'^^ comfited them in battell, in the which Maglanus and Henninus state!* 'Leir were slaine : and then was Leir restored to his kingdome, which yews Jut Ills 1!'Gfi1fnT'~ he ruled after this by the space of two yeeres, and then died, ation, and ■' -^ ' ' ' then died.] fortie yeeres after he first began to reigne.i 1 Shakspere was perhaps indebted to Holinshed for SQinething more than the story of Lear : a There being (according to Hoi. i. H. E. 12/2/S5) a "temple of Apollo, which stood in the citie of Troinouant" (London), may explain why Lear swears by that deity (Lewr, I. i. 162). Holinshed also says S. E. 14/1/37) that Lear's grandson, Cnnedag, built a temple "to Apollo in CornewaU." /3 Lear's comparison of himself to a Jragon {Lear, I. i. 123, 124) may have been suggested by the fact that a later British king "was sumamed Pendragon, ... for that Marline the great prophet likened him to a dragons n. CYMBELINE. Cordeilla succeeded Lear, and reigned for five years^ Quiring wMch time lier husband died. At the close pf this period, the rebellion of Margan the son of Gronorilla and Cunedag the son of Segan ended with her imprisonment by her nephews. Havimg no hope of release, and being "a, woman of a manUe courage," she slew herseM.— ^SW. i. R. E. 13/2I4S- II. CYMBELINE. Holinshed's Chronicles contain all the historical or pseudo-historical matter which appears in Shakspere's Tragedie of GymbeUne. The historic Cunobelinus, son of Tasciovanus,'^ was a King of the Britons,^ whose capital was Camulodunum ^ (Colchester). In a.d. ift Cunobelin's son Adminius, whom he had banished, made a submission to Caligula which the Emperor affected to regard as equivalent to a surrender of the whole island, but nothing was them done to assert the imperial authority.* Cunobelin was dead when, in a.d, 43, Aulus. Plautius was sent by Claudius to subdue Britain ; and the Romans were opposed by the late king's sons 'Dsgodumnus and the renowned Caractaeus.^ These are the sole authentic particulars relating to Cunobelin, beside the evidence derived from his coins. Act HI. se. i. — In the following passages Holinshed has given an untrustworthy account of Cymbelme, mixed with genuine information head, that at the time of his ixatiuite maTuelonslie appeared in the firmament at the comer of a blazing star, as is reported. But others suppose he was so caUed of his wisdome and serpentine sabtiltie, or for that he gane the dragons head in his banner" {Sol. i. if. E. 87/2/7). 1 In 1844 Mr. Birch eommunicated a paper to the Numismatic Society (Nmm. Gh/ron. voL vii. p. 78), showing that the reverse legends of some of Cunobeline's coins should be read : tasciovani. F.; that is, Tasciovani 'Silivs. — See Evans's Coiiis of the Ancient Britons, pp. 221, 327. Other reverses read TASc. F., and lAscnovAMi. f. — EmM&, pp. 308, 328. Of the latter form it may be necessary to remark that tascii— is probably equivalent to tasce — ; the double I being often used, on British coins, for K {Emmi, pp. 203, 206, 258, 372). The termination — vanii gives a variant nominative Tasdovanius. Mr. Birch compared these legends with avqvstvs dtvt f., on coins of Augustus. * So styled by Suetonius, in his biography of Caligul% cap. xliv. Cunobe- line's capital was Camulodunum, which we learn from Ptolemy (Geographioy lib. II. cap. iiL) was the town (sroXte) of the Triaobantes ; a people who «m«e Inhabited Middlesex and Essex. The obverse of a copper coin ol Cunobeline bears the legend cvnobelinvs rex. See Evans's Ooim of ifce Aneieni Britons, p. 332. 5 '^To KafunAoSmivov rb tov Evvo^eXXivov fiairtXnev." — Dion Cassiiis, ed. Reimar, Ix. 21. A copper coin of Cunobeline, found at Colchester, has the obverse legend camvl-odvno. — Evans's Covng of the Aneient Britons, p. 337. * Suet. Calig. xliv. ^ Di/m Gassius, Ix. 20. Claudius followed PJautins, and was present at the capture of Camulodunum by the Bomans. II. OYMBELINE. 7 toqching tbe ci^eumstances of the Empire and Britain during the reign of Augustus. [Ifol. i. H. M. S2/2/3.] Kymbeline or Cimbeline the sonne of ^m>>aine. Theonaantius ^ was of the Britaina made king after the deceasse of his father, in the yeare of the world 3944, after the Building of Rome 728, and before the birth of our Sauiour 33. This man ^o»«»n »«« ofOmdodx (iBS some write) was brought vp at Rome, and there made knight ^^^Aiae by At^stus Cesar,' vnder whome he serued in the -vrarres, and ^^^^ was in such fauour with him, that he was at liberie to pay his SSug"? to tribute OP not. . . . Touching the continuance of the yeares of Kymbelines reigne, some writers doo varie, but the best approoued [CymiMipo affirme, that he reigned 35 years and then died, & was buried yearfesn* at London, leaning behind him two sonnes, Gruiderius and ^> ^*' Aruiragus.3 A^wnl IT But here is to be noted, that although our histories doo affirme, that as well this Kymbeline, as also his father Theomantius lined in quiet with the Romans, and continuallie to them paied the tributes whieh the Britains had couenanted with Julius Cesar [Roman to pay, yet we find in the Romane writers, that after Julius Cesars that the ^ •" ■' _' , Britons le- death, when Augustus had taken ypon him the rule of the empire, J^k'^J^'^ the Britakis refused to paie that tribute: whereat as Cornelius cmf'rSf, Tamtm reporteth, Augustus (being otherwise occupied) was con- ^j^'"^' tented to winke ; howbeit, through earnest calling vpon to recouer his right by such as were desirous to see the vttermost of the British kingdome ; at length, to wit, in the tenth yeare after the death of Julius Cesar, which was about the thirteenth yeare of the said Theomantius, Augustus made prouision to passe with an [Angustus T. ■ . o o ji 1 • • • prepares armie ouer mto Britaina, & was come forward vpon his lournie to invade Bntain.] 1 "Tenantius" (the' spellipg in Cynib. I. i. 31) oecurs as a variant form ia Hoi. L^M. E. 32/l/|^ above. Shaispere seems to have adopted Fah.'s con- jecture (reported in Bol. i. B. E, 31/2/2?) that Caasihelan, ^ndrogeus, and Tenantius were sons of Lud, lOyi^be^we's grandfather j for Cymbelme ia reminded by Lucius that tribute was imposed by Julii^s Caesar on " Oassibulan, thine Unkle" {Oywh. III. i. 6). Holuishsid preferred tjie supposition that Cassibelan was Lud's brother (Wol. i. M. H. 23/?/! 2). 2 Cp. Cymb. III. i. 70 : " Thy Csesar Knighted me ; my yoijth I spent Much vnder him " ; . ■ . s We learn from Juvenal (Sat. IV. 124-127) that a British prince named Arviragus was a contemporary of Dpmitian. 8 11. CYMBELINE. Dimcaitiut. into Gallia Celtica: or as we maie saie, into these hither parts of France. Snedby a But here receiuing aduertisements that the Pannonians, which tt^pinnoni- inhabited the countrie now called Hungarie, and the Dalmatians mitdans.] whome now we call Slauons had rebelled, he thought it best first to subdue those rebells neere home,^ rather than to seeke new countries, and leaue such in hazard whereof he had present possession, and so turning his power against the Pannonians and Dalmatians, he left off for a time the warres of Britain. . . . S^hm"°* But whether this controuersie which appeareth to fall forth OT^me ^ betwixt the Britans and Augustus, was occasioned by Kymbeline, prince rafuB- or some othcr prince of the Britains, I haue not to auouch : for ed tribute, i . i i but cym- that by our writers it is reported, that Kymbeline bemg brought ttlB^m^, ^ ^ Rome, & knighted in the court of Augustus, euer shewed tte BWMi himselfe a friend to the Bomans, & chieflie was loth to breake bronghtnp with them, because the youth of the Britaine nation should not them.] be depriued of the benefit to be trained and brought vp among the Romans, whereby they might leame both to behaue them- selues like ciuiU men, and to atteine to the knowledge of feats of warre.* S'lSSi"' But whether for this respect, or for that it pleased the wS?^ almightie God so to dispose the minds of men at that present, ruled.] not oulie the Britains, but in manner all other nations were contented to be obedient to the Romane empire. That this was * Cymbeline replies to Lucius (Gymh. III. L 73-75): . . . " I am perfect, That the Pannonians and Dalmatians for Their Liberties are now in Armes " : ... 2 Cp. Posthumus's words ^Oynib. II. iv. 20-26) : ..." Our Countrymen Are men more order'd then when Julius Caesar Smil'd at their Zocfee of shUl, but found their courage Worthy his frowning at : Their discipline (Now mingled [wing-led F] with their courages) will make tnowne To their Approuers, they are People such That mend vpon the world." As to the military strength of Britain at the time of Caesar's invasion. Hoi. says (ii., The first mhabitation of Ireland, 61/1/14): . . . "the British nation was then vnskilfull, and not trained to feats of war, for the Britons then being onelie vsed to the Picts and Irish enimies, people halfe naked, through lacke of skill easilie gaue place to the Bomans force," . , , II. CYMBELINE. 9 true in the Britains, it is euident enough by Strdbos words, which ««»■«*• «'«'<'• are in effect as folio weth. "At this present (saith he") certeine [Kespeot ,. . J, i \ / shown to princes of Britaine, procuring by ambassadors and dutifuU 4^ritish' "demeanors the amitie of the emperour Augustus, haue offered p'""™'-' " in the capitoU vnto the gods presents or gifts, and haue ordeined " the whole He in a manner to be appertinent, proper, and familiar "to the Eomans. They are burdened with sore customs which t^"™?'' * importeu by "they paie for wares, either to be sent foorth into Gallia, or B"*»'"-3 "brought from thence, which are commonlie yuorie vessels, " sheeres, ouches, or earerings, and other conceits made of amber "& glasses, and such like manner of merchandize." Holinshed {Hoi. ii. ff, S. 45/1/55) records an embassy from Augustus to Cymbeline, which may have given Shakspere a hint for the less peaceful mission of Caius Lucius. [Hoi. ii. S. S. 45/1/55.1 About the same time r?25 n.c.1 Kimbaiine also there came vnto Kimbaiine king of the Britains an Bntam». o [An ambas- ambassador from Augustus the emperor, with thanks, for that "^.^^ entring into the gouernement of the British state, he had kept fOT^'io;^!. his allegiance toward the Romane empire: exhorting him to Eomam] keepe his subiects in peace with all their neighbors, sith the whole world, through meanes of the same Augustus, was now in quiet, without all warres or troublesome tumults. Caius Lucius demands a yearly tribute of three thousand pounds, which had been imposed on Cassibelan and " his Succession " ^ by Julius Caesar, but had been " lately . . . left vntender'd " by Cym- beline, Cassibelan's nephew {Cywh. III. i. 2 — 10). This pretension to tribute arose when Caesar, after defeating Cassibelan,^ blockaded the residue of the British levies, so that — [Casaibeian ' agrees to pay \Hol. i. E. E. 30/2/73.] Cassibellane in the end was forced tofbSe.] ... • • 1. ., So saith to fall to a composition, in couenantmg to paie a yearue tribute f^f^^^ of three thousand pounds. fimolZ^'^ ^ Tenantius, whom Cymbeline succeeded, "paid the tribute to the Bomans which Cassibellane [Tenantius's immediate predecessor] had granted." — Hoi. i. H.E.32/1I73. . 2 Holinshed's authorities are Hist. Britt. IV. x. 67, and Matthew of West- minster (ed. 1601, p. 38). According to them this success was the restilt of a third invasion by Caesar. The authentic account is that the Komans' second invasion of Britain closed with the submission of Cassivellaunus (or Cassi- belan) ; and that Caesar,, before leaving Britain for the last time, " obsides imperat, et, quid in annos singulos vectigalis populo Bomano Britannia penderet, constituit " (De Bdlo Qallico, V. 22). 10 II. CYMBELINE. Shakspere forsook Ids authori'ty in makicg CJymbeline refuse tribute.^ The refusal came from Guiderius, as the foUowiag exeerpt shows. cuiSritt^ ^ffoi I ff E 33/1/63.] Guiderius the first sonne of Kymbeline (of whom ffarison saieth nothing) began his reigne in the seuen- SS'^'to. ^^^ yeere after th' Incarnation of Christ, This Guiderius being Eo^ms!}* a man of stout courage, gaue occasion of breach of peace betwixt the Britains and Bomans, denieng to paie them tribute, and procuring the people to new insurrections, which by one mean© or other made open rebellion, as Gyldas saith.^ In Holinshed's second volume, Guiderius's rebellion is thus narrated. u^Z \fio^- "■ ^- ^- 45/2/42.] . . . Kimbaline king of the Britains A^^tjM ^YS^ -n^ho for that he had beene brought vp in Rome, obserued his promised obedience towards the empire ; but Guiderius suc- ceeding, disdained to see the libertie of his countrie oppressed m^m\ ^y ^^ Romans, and therefore procuring the Britains to assist ^mS** him, assembled a power, and inuaded the Romans with such somami. yiolence, that none escaped with life, but such as saued themselues within castels & fortresses. The next point to be noticed is Cloten'a rejection of tribute, because "Britaine's a world by it selfe" {Gywh, III. i, 12, 13); a view which Shakspere may have gathered from one or all of the following passages. Unto what [Hol. i. Description of Britaine, 3/1/30.] And whereas by portion j. i / i ^ j j fS^^ Vi]^l[,who] — speaking of our Hand — saith; Btpenit'diS toto dimsos orhe Britannos^ And some other authors not vnwoorthie to be read and perused, it is not certeine vnto which portion of the earth our Hands, and Thule, with sundrie the like scattered in the north seas should be ascribed, bicause they excluded them (as you see) from the rest of the whole earth: I haue thought good, for facilitie sake * In The Faerie Queens, II. x. 50, the Romans are said to have made war on Cymbeline because " their tribute he ref usd to let be payd." " Soone after " the birth of Christ this war began. In the next stanza Arviragus is spoken of as Cymbeline's brother. * Grildas records Boadicea's revolt (Mistoria GMae, IV.). His book contains no mention of Guiderius. 3 Ed. I. 67. II. CYMBELINE. 1 1 bf diuisiOTi, to refer them all which lie within the first miuute of longitude, set downe by Fiotome, to Europa. [HoL i. H. M. 34/1/10.] The souldiers [of Aulus Plantius] hearing of this Toiage [to BritaiH], were loth to go with him, as men not willing to make warre in another worM. Holinshed's Chronicles include a panegyric by Claudius Maniertinus, whose congratulations were offered to the EttipeKW Maximian I., upon the reunion of Britain to the Empire, after the fall (a.d. 296)' of the British Emperor AUectus, the panegyrist calling to mind how Caesar {Sal. l H. E. 57/2/60.1 writ that he had found an other ^^^^ world, supposing it to be so big, that it was not compassed with, ^^° the sea, but that rather by resemblance the great Ocean was ^"''*' compassed with it. Subsequently Maximian is thus addressed : {Hd. i. E. E. mM59-] Glorie you therefore, inumcibfo P^Jg**,™"- emperour, for that you haue as it were got an other world, & S^nn in restoring to the Bomane puissance the glory of conquest by mothe? ^'^ sea, haue added to the Eomane empire an element greater than all the compasse of the earth, that is, the mightie maine ocean. Cloten havilig renounced tribute, the Queen — seornf ully appraising the value of that " kinde of conquest " which " Caesar made heere " — ■ declares (III. i. 26—29) how his Shipping (Poore ignorant baubles !) on our terrible Seas, Like Egge^shels mou'd vpon their Surges, ccack'd As easily 'gainst our Kockes. Caesar, when he first invaded Britain, landed without his camtlrj ; the eighteen transports conveying those troops not having, pursuant to his orders, followed the fleet which bore him and the foot-soHiers. Failing in their attempt to prevent his disembarkation, the Britons sued for peace, and complied with his demand for hostages (De Bella GaUicQ, IV. 23-31). \Hol. i H. M. 25/3/60.] Peace being thus established after ^^f ^^^ the fourth day of the Romans arriuall in Britain, the 18 ships ^I'^'JSSt"^, which (as ye haue heard) were appointed to conuey the horssemea ^"*»'°J ouer, loosed from the further hauen with a soft wind. Which when they approched so neere the shore of Britain^ that the Romans which were in Cesars campe might see them, suddenlie there arose so great a tempest, that none of them was able to 12 n. CYMBELINE. [They are kcepc Us couFse, SO that they Were not onelie driuen in sunder a tempest.] (gome being caried againe into Gallia, and some ■westward) but also the other ships that lay at anchor, and had brought ouer [The ships at the armic, were so pitifullie beaten, tossed and shaken, that a anchor are '^ ,., i-xii-uj.! i^to^' great number of them did not onehe lose their tackle, but also to\l^out were caried by force of wind into the high sea ; the rest being M,^^ likewise so filled with water, that they were in danger by sinking ing.] to perish and to be quite lost.^ The same misfortune befell Caesar on his second expedition to Britain. He landed unopposed, and, marching inland with the bulk of his forces, drove the Britons f ronr a stronghold where they awaited his attack (Be Bello GaUioo, Y. 8, 9). [cassar [Hol. i. H. H. 28/2/2.1 The next day, as he had sent foorth hearsthathis ■■ ,,Tr... i-j- ships have guch as should hauo pursued the Britams, word came to mm irom been mach ^ SpMt.^'Ld Quintus Atrius,2 that his nauie by rigour of a sore and hideous ttodiore"i tempest was greeuouslie molested, and throwne vpon the shore, so that the cabels and tackle being broken and destroied with force of the vnmercifuU rage of wind, the maisters and mariners were not able to helpe the matter. The Queen's assertion (1. 26), that Caesar was " twice beaten " by the Britons, rests on the authority of chroniclers whose truthfulness was perhaps doubted even in Shakspere's day, though he found their narratives quoted along with the Cormnentaries upon the Gallic War. Caesar's account of his first expedition to these shores having been set forth by Holinshed, there follows what professes to be the British version of the events of this campaign. camrde [Hol. 1. R. K 27li/i5.] IT Thus writeth Cesar touching his lib. i. ' first ioumie made into Britaine. But the British historie (which 1 Below we read that " not hauing other stuffe to repairs his ships, he [Caesar] caused 12 of those that were vtterlie past reoouerie by the hurts receiued through violence of the tempest, to be broken, wherewith the other (in which some recouerie was perceiueo.) might be repaired and amended." — Hol. i. H. E. 26/1/31. (The famous words, " Veni, Vidi, Vioi," are translated " I came, I saw, I ouercame," in the life of Julius Caesar in North's Flutwrch, ed. 1579, p. 787.) It is possible that, before writing the Queen's harangue, — the aim of which is to show how Caesar's prosperity deserted him in Britain, — ■ Shakspere glanced at Caesar's remark upon the unforeseen lack of cavalry to pursue the retreating Britons, after the legionaries had effected their landing : " And this one thing seemed onelie to disappoint the luckie fortune that was accustomed to follow Cesar in all his other enterprises." — flbJ. i. H. E. 25/2/28 (fi. O. IV. 26). ' Whom Caesar had left in charge of the fleet. II. CYMBELINE. 13 Polydor calletli the new historie) ^ declareth that Cesar in a pitcht £^JS)5,"Je!'' bistorsr de- clares that Caesai was beaten in a field was vanquished at the first encounter, and so withdrew backe into France. pitched battle, and Caesar's account of his second invasion was also contradicted, Qaui.] another victory being claimed by the Britons. \Hol. i. H. E. 30/2/9.] Thus according to that which Cesar himselfe and other autentike authors haue written, was Britaine made tributarie to the Romans by the conduct of the same Cesar. IT But our histor[i]es farre differ from this, affirming that Cesar ^^^y^^ comming the second time, was by the Britains with valiancie and martiall prowesse beaten and repelled, as he was at the first, and speoiallie by meanes that Cassibellane had pight in the Thames [i^e British great piles of trees piked with yron, through which his ships being SbS™ that entred the riuer, were perished and lost. And after his comming second inva- sion was a land, he was vanquished in battell, and constrained to flee into he^fl"! V* Gallia with those ships that remained. <='*'^) The Queen also says that Cassibelan " was once at point ... to master Caesars Sword "^ {GyTnb, III. i. 30, 31). According , to the Historia Britomu/m — referred to below as " The same historie " — Caesar actually lost his sword during the battle in which he met with the first of those defeats whereof the Queen reminds Caius Lucius. \Hol. i. H. E. 27hl40.'] The same historic also maketh [Caesarioses *■ I IT J ^ ^ hisswoid.] inention of . . . Nenius brother to Cassibellane, who in fight happened to get Cesars' swoord fastened in his shield by a blow vhich Cesar stroke at him. 1 The " new historie," as Polydore Vergil calls it, is, I believe, the Historia Britonum; which contains (IV. iii. 58, 69) particulars of the "pitcht field." There is more about this victory, taken from Boece (3I/40-80), in Hoi, i, H E. 2111/72, &o. Posthumus's father SioDius (Cym6. 1, i. 29, 30),— " who did ioyne his House Against the Bomanes with Cassibulan " , — ^no doubt took part in this battle, where also, as Hoi. records, Tenantius was present, from whom Sicilius "had his Titles" (1. 31). 2 The Queen's expression — "at point to master Caesar's Sword" — ^implies that his sword was nearly wrested from him by force, not caught by accident ; and she has, it will be observed, attributed to Cassibelan the honour of this partial success. Caesar's sword was placed by Cassibelan in a sarcophagus, with the body of Nennius, who died fifteen days after the battle from a wound inflicted by this weapon, which was named " Crocea mors, quia nullus evadebat vivus qui eo vulnerabatur" {Hist, Britt, IV, iv. 60). 14 II. CYMBELINE. [The BritiBh retjoicing&for their secotid victory.] The name of Troirumant cJutiiged and. calUd Zondon. Caesar's second defeat was attended by rejoicings which the Queen connects with the Britons' first victory, when he lost his sword. [Hoi. i. H. H. 30/2/22.J For ioy of this second victorie (saith Gal/rid) Cassibellane made a great feast at London, and there did sacrifice to the gods. The scene of these rejoicings was " Luds-Towne," (Cymh, III. i. S2), known as Troinovant until it became the special care of Lud, Gassibd&n's elder brother. [Hoi. i. H. E. 23/1/S9.] By reason that king Lud so mu«h esteemed that citie^ before all other of his realme, inlar^ng it so greatlie as he did, and continuallie in manner remained there, the name was changed, so that it was called Caerlud, that is to sale, Luds towne : and after by corruption of speech it was named London. Courteously, but firmly, Cymbeline rejects the Koman demand, and bids Lucius say to Augustus (III. i. 55 — 62) : Our Ancestor was that Mulmutius, which Ordain'd our Lawes, .... Who was the first of Britaine, which did put 60 His browes within a golden Ci"owne, and call'd Himselfe a king. Holinshed relates how, after the deatiis of Terrex and Pffiprex.^ the last acknowledged descendants of Brutus, Britain was plunged into civil war, then became subject to a penteirchy of kings, and was finally reunited under one sceptre by Mulmucius Dunwallon, son of Cloton King of Cornwall. Among the great deeds of Mulmucius these are recorded : ^ Matth. Wast. [Hol. \. H. E. 15/2/34.J He also made manie good lawes, Laioes made i.. i »» ini-nri .i [byMuimn- -ffhich wcrc loug after vsed, called Mulmucms lawes, turned out cius, and * Ltid built there "a faire temple neere to his . . . palace, which temple (atf some take it) was after turned to a, churah, and at this dale called Paules." — Bol. i. H. E. 23/1/59. Perhaps the temple in « Luds-Towne,"— assigned by Shakspere to "great luplter," — where Cymbeline ratified peace with the Eomans {Cymb. V. v. 481-483). 2 Sons of Gorbodue, King of Britain. Their history is dramatized in our earliest tragedy, written by Thomas SackviUe and Thomas Norton, and acted on January 18, 1561. * The chapter containing these passages (bk. III. chap. 1. p. 15) is headed : " Of Mulmucius the first king / of Britame, who was crowned / with a golden crowne, his lawes, / his foundations, with other / his acts and deeds." Mulmu- cius "began his reigne ouer the whole monarchie of Britaine, in the yeere of the world 3529, after the building of Rome 314, and after the deliuerance of the Israelites out of captinitie 97, and about the 26 yeere of Darius Artaxerxes Longimanus, the flft king of the Persians." — Ibid. II. CYMBELINE, 1 5 of the British speedi into the Latine by Oildas Priscus,^ and long time after translated out of latine into english by Alfred king ^^^®*''y of England, and mingled in his statutes. . . . After he had established his land, and set his Britains in good jK'^*^"' and oonuenient order, he ordeined him by the adiidse of his lords o^Sm"^'* a crowne of gold, & caused himselfe with great solemnitie to be ""'^'• crowned, according to the custom of the pagan lawes then in tse : & bicause he was the first that l^ife a crowne heere in Bidtaine, after the opinion of some writers, he is named the fir^t king of Britaine, and all the other before rehearsed are named rulers, dukes, or gouernois. V. iii. — Another part of Cymbelme for which Holinshed furnished aaatter is the description given by Posthnmus {V. iii. 3 — 58) of the means whereby victory was transf^ifi«d from the Eomans to the Britons. The prowess of Belarius, and his adopted children, Guiderius and ArnragUB, has a parallei in an exploit attributed to a Scottish husbandman named Hay, who, with his two sons' help, routed the X^nes at the battle of Loncart, fought a.d. 976. Before quoting the passages of Holinshed which relate to this event, I must premise that, -while the issue of the battle was douhtiful, the Scots embarraersed themselves by beheading those Danes who had fallen.^ [Etol ii. S. S. 155/1/48.] Which manet being noted of the ^^^g^ Danes, and perceiuing that there was no hope of life but in f^^, victorie, they rushed foorth with such violence vpon their aduet- ■™"^'' saries, that first the right, and then after the leift wing of the Scots, was constreined to retire and flee backe, the middle-'ward stoutly yet keeping their ground: but the same stood in such danger, being now left naked on the sides, that the victorie must 1 Generally known as Gildas Sapiens, bom -about A.D. 516. s Two more pbSBiblfe traces of ShakBpeTe*s Holinshed-readiiig may be ntftioed. a In Oj/wift. III. v. 23, the lung spfeaks of fthariots as a British arm. Shakspere would find their use in warfare described hj Mol. (i. H. M. 26/2/11), who took his account from Caesar (De Bdlo -GeM-lco, If. 3S). j3 When Aulus Plautius was ssdling to invade Britain, "the marrinerB and men of warre" were encouraged by seeing. "a fierie leame [light] to shoot out of the east toward the west, which way their course lay," . . . <(flbJ. i. S. iE, 34/2/9). Cp. Philarmonus's answer to Oaius Lucius, who asked for the soothsayer's dream "of this warres purpose" (Vymh. IV. u. 348-352) : "I saw loues Bird, the Roman Eagle, "ffing'cl From the spungy South to this paiSt of me West, Then vaniah'd in the Sun-beames_: which portends (Vnlesse my sinnes abuse my ditsinatiDn) Suceesse to th' Beman hoaEft." 16 II. CYMBELINE. Bail miili hit tvfo sonrua [hasted to aid the King, who was fighting in the middle- ward]. [Kear the l)attle-field was a long lane, where the Danes slew the Scots in heaps (cp. Oirm)>. IV. iii. 6—14).] Sate BtaUd the Scots frQ running avjay [' and spared . . . reach.* Cp. (^/mb. - IV. iii. 25— 28]. The Scots were driuen to fhtir iattelt affaine. The Dana JledUmards their fellowes in great dis- order. needes haue remained with the Danes, had not a renewer of the battell come in time, by the appointment (as is to be thought) of almightie God. For as it chanced, there was in the next field at the same time an husbandman, with two of his sons busie about his worke, named Haie, a man strong and stifFe in making and shape of bodie, but indued with a valiant courage. This Haie beholding the king with the most part of the nobles, fighting with great valiancie in the middle ward, now destitute of the wings, and in great danger to be oppressed by the great violence of his enimies, caught a plow-beame in his hand, and with the same exhorting his sonnes to doo the like, hasted towards the battell, there to die rather amongest other in defense of his countrie, than to remaine aliue after the discomfiture in miserable thraldome and bondage of the cruell and most vnmercifull enimies. There was neere to the place of the battell, a long lane fensed on the sides with ditches and walles made of turfe, through the which the Scots which fled were beaten downe by the enimies on heapes. Here Haie with his sonnes, supposing they might best stale the flight, placed themselues ouerthwart the lane, beat them backe whome they met fleeing, and spared neithey friend nor fo : but downe they went all such as came within their reach, wherewith diuerse hardie personages cried vnto their fellowes to returne backe vnto the battell, for there was a new power of Scotishmen come to their succours, by whose aid the victorie might be easilie obteined of their most cruell aduersaries the Danes : therefore might they choose whether they would be slaine of their owne feUowes comming to their aid, or to returne againe to fight with the enimies. The Danes being here staled in the lane by the great valiancie of the father and the sonnes, thought verely there had beene some great succors of Scots come to the aid of their king, and therevpon ceassing from further pursute, fled backe in great disorder vnto the other of their fellowes fighting with the middle ward of the Scots. The Scots also that before was chased, being incouraged here- with, pursued the Danes vnto the place of the battell right fiercelie. Wherevpon Kenneth perceiuing his people to be thus II. CYMBELINE. 17 recomforted, and his enimies partlie abashed, called rpon his men ^^!^g'^ to remember their duties, and now sith their aduersaries hearts ^^^^ began (as they might perceiue) to faint, he willed them to follow **«*'• '""^'• vpon them manfully, which if they did, he assured them that the victorie Tndoubtedlie should be theirs. The Scots incouraged with the kings words, laid about them so earnestlie, that in the end the Danes were constreined to forsake the field, and the Scots The Danea forsake the egerlie pursuing in the chase, made great slaughter of them as ^^'^'• they fled. This victorie turned highlie to the praise of the Scotish nobilitie, the which fighting in the middle ward, bare still the brunt of the battell, continuing manfiillie therein euen to the end. But Haie, who in such wise (as is before mentioned) staled them cihe victory wfts won that fled, causing them to returne againe to the field, deserued though immortall fame and commendation: for by his meanes chieflie ^ma.] was the yictorie atchiued. I conclude with a list of personal names found in Cymbeline, which Shakspere may have picked up here and there from the pages of Holinshed's Chronicles. C^ADWAiiL, pseudonym of Arviragus {GyTnb. III. iii. 95). Cadwallo King of Britain ; began to reign a.d. 635 {Hoi. i. H. E. 112/i/6s). Glosten (Gymh, I. ii.). Cloton,^ a king of Cornwall, father of Mtdmucius Duhwallon {Hoi. i. E. E. I5/2/21). GoBNEi/ius, a physician {Gymh. I. v.). The name <^ CoBNELitrs Tacitus, the historian, occurs in HqI. L H. E. 51/1/60, et passim,. Helenb or Helen, Imogen's woman {GymA. it. ii. 1). Helen, daughter of Coell King of Britain, and mother of Gonstanline the Great {Hoi i. S. E. 62/1/57), Imogen {Gyvftb. I. i-)- Innogen,^ wife of Brute, first ruler of Britain {Hoi. i. H. E. 8/2/48). LtJOius, ambassador from Augustus {Gymh. III. i.). Lucius King of Britain, who began to reign a.d. 124 {Hoi. i. H. E. 5I/2/40). Also Lucius, a Boman " capteine " in Gaul, vanquished by Arthur King of Britain {Hoi. i. H. E. 91/x/39). MoEGAN or MJBBGAN,* pseudonym of Belarius {Gyn^. III. iii. 106 ; V. V. 332), Masgan, joint king of Britain, son c£ Henninus Duke of Gornwall, and Gonorilla eldest daughter of King Leir {Hoi. i. H- E. 13/2/56). PpLjpoBB or Paladoue (the^ latter spelling in Gymb. III. iii. 86), 1 On the same page his name appears as "Clotenus." As "Clotyn Buke of Comewall " he is a character in Gorbodmc Ost ed., 1&65). * «'Inn(^6n," the wife of Leonatus, is in the first Entiy of Much Ado (Qi, 1600). Oiflnheline was probably written about 1610. 3 Spelt" Moigan " in Holinshed's " second table for the Hstorie of Britaine and England." In the old Leir, Kagan's husband is Morgan King of Cambria. 18 III. MACBETH. pseudonym of Guiderius. The name of Polydor Virgil, the historian, occurs in Hoi. i. H. E. 85/1/34, et passim. PosTHUMUs {Cymh. I. i.). PosTHUMUS,a son of Aeneas and Lavinia, born after his father's death {Hoi. i. H. E. l/il^o). SiciLLius, father of Posthumus (Cymi. I. i. 29). Sicilius King of Britain, began to reign B.C. 430 {Sol, i. H, E. 1 9/2/46). III. MACBETH. The historic time embraced by The Tragedie of Macbeth begins in 1040, when Duncan was slain, and ends with Macbeth's defeat by Siward on July 27, 1054. The historic Macbeth, however, escaped from the battle, and was killed in August, 1057. Act I. sc. ii. — ^The following excerpts contain the materials for this scene. Shakspere was perhaps induced to make " the Norweyan lord " an ally of Macdonwald because Holinshed says that Sueno invaded Scotland 1 "immediately" after the suppres»on of the rebellion. Steevens conjectured that the mere official title (" sergeant at armes ") of the messenger, who was sent to command the rebels' presence at Court, gave Shakspere a hint for introducing a sergeant, from whom Duncan learns the latest news of the revolt (I. ii. 2, 3). D^ZlTun t^"^- "• ^- ^- I68/2/12.] After Malcolme succeeded hia of Scotland nephuc Duncane the sonne of his daughter Beatrice : for Malcome had two daughters, the one which was this Beatrice, being giuen in mariage vnto one Abbanath Crinen, a man of great nobilitie, and thane of the lies and west parts of Scotland, bare of that mariage the foresaid Duncane; the other called Doada, was [cousin to maried vnto Sinell ^ the thane of Glammis, by whom she had issue Macbeth], ' •' Makbeth ouc Makbeth a valiant gentleman, and one that if he had not [valiant, but somewhat becue somcwhat cruell of nature, might haue beene thought most woorthie the gouernement of a realme. On the other part, Duncane Duncan of was SO soft and gentle of nature,* that the people wished the tooeofta ° '^ '^ natnre. inclinations and manors of these two cousins to haue beene so tempered and interchangeablie bestowed betwixt them, that where 1 These fictitious invasions of Sueno and Canute are, I believe, mentioned by no writer earlier than Boece, 247/55 !•> &". 2 This name is variously spelt. Pordv/n's spelling is " Finele " (IV. xlix. 233), whence perhaps came Boece's " Synel " (246/64 b). 8 With this description compare Macbeth's epithet, " the gracious Duncan " (III. i. 66). III. MACBETH. 19 the one had too much of clemencie, and the other of crueltie, the meane vertue betwixt these two extremities might haue reigned by indifferent partition in them both, so should Duncane haue proued a woorthie king, and Makbeth an excellent capteine. The beginning of Duncans re^e was verie quiet and peaceable, without anie notable trouble; but after it was perceiued how negligent he was in punishing offendors, manie misruled persons £Sg{Sg™tta* tooke occasion thereof to trouble the peace and quiet state of the Sffenderej common-wealth, by seditious commotions which first had their beginnings in this wise. Banquho the thane of Lochquhaber, of whom the house of the ^^^ " Stewards is descended, the which by order of linage hath now for ■'^"^s"*"*"'- *' " The home of a long time inioied the crowne of Scotland, euen till these our thestewardi. daies, as he gathered the finances due to the king, and further punished somewhat sharpelie such as were notorious offendors, being assailed by a number of rebels inhabiting in that countrie, ^^g^'fj^^ and spoiled of the monie and all other things, had much a doo i^^aier. to get awaie with life, after he had receiued sundrie grieuous wounds amongst them. Yet escaping their hands, after hee was somewhat recouered of his hurts, and was able to ride, he repaired to the court, where making his complaiat to the king in most earnest wise, he purchased at length that the offendors were sent for by a sergeant at armes, to appeare to make answer vnto such matters as should be laid to their charge : but they augmenting their mischiefous act with a more wicked deed, after they had misused the messenger with sundrie kinds of reproches, they ^,^^/^* finaUie slue him also. tTZ'rda.! Then doubting not but for such contemptuous demeanor against the kings regall authoritie, they should be inuaded with all the power the kiug could make, Makdowald one of great ^^^^. estimation among them, making first a confederacie with his J^^?^'„^ neerest friends and kinsmen, tooke ypon him to be chiefe capteine of all such rebels as would stand against the king, in maintenance of their grieuous offenses latelie committed against him. Manie slanderous words also, and railing tants this Makdowald Tttered ^e oaiis ' ° Duncan a against his prince, calling him a faint-hearted milkesop, more meet S^^*^^'* to gouerne a sort of idle moonks in some cloister, than to haue the 20 III. MACBETH. [People from tbe western isles, and kerns and gallow- glasses from Ireland, helii him. Cp. Macb. 1. i. 12, IS.] ifakdowald diicon^fiUih the kings poteer. The smal tkilofthe 3n7tg in tsar- like affaires. MaJcbetht offer [to subdue the rebels, in concei't with Banquo]. Hakbeth and Sanqufut are sent xtgainst the rebels. The rebels forsake their cajpteine. Mahd&icaZd slaieth his wife and children^ & lastlie him- telfe. rule of such valiant and bardie men of warre as the Scots were. He Tsed also such subtill persuasions and forged allurements, that in a small time he had gotten togithef a mightie power of men : for out of the westerne lies there came vnto him a great multitude of people, oflFering themselues to assist him in that rebellious quarell, and out of Ireland in hope of the spoile came no small number of Kernes and Galloglasses, offering gladlie to serue vnder him, whither it should please him to lead them. Makdowald thus hauing a mightie puissance about him, incoun- tered with such of the kings people as were sent against him into Loohquhfiber, and discomfiting them, by mere force tooke their capteine Malcolme, and after the end of the battell smote off his head. This ouerthrow being notified to the king, did put him in woonderfuU feare, by reason of his small skill in warlike affaires. Calling therefore his nobles to a councell, he asked of them their best aduise for the subduing of Makdowald & other the rebels. Here, in sundrie heads (as euer it happeneth) were sundrie opinions, which they Tttered adcording to euerie man his skill. At length Makbeth speaking much against the kings softnes, and ouermuch slacknesse in punishing offendoiB, whereby they had such time to assemble togither, he promised notwithstanding, if the charge were committed vnto him and vnto Banquho, so to order the matter, that the rebels should be shortly vanquished & quite put downe, and that not so much as one of them should be found to make resistance within the countrie. And euen so it came to passe : for being sent foorth with a new power, at his entring into Lochquhaber, the fame of his comming put the enimies in such feare, that a great number of them stale secretlie awaie from their capteine Makdowald, who neuerthelesse inforced thereto, gaue battell vnto Makbeth, with the residue which remained with him : but being ouercome, and fleeing for refuge into a castell (within the which his wife & children were inclosed) at length when he saw how he could neither defend the hold anie longer against his enimies, nor yet vpOn surrender be suffered to depart with life saued, hee first slue his wife and children, and lastlie himselfe, least if he had yeelded simplie, he should haue beene executed in most cruell wise for an example law Tatmed. Ill, MACBETH. 21 to other. Makbett entring into the castell by the gates, as then set open, found the carcaspe of Makdowald lieng dead there amongst the residue of the slaine bodies, which when he beheld, renaittijQg no peece of his eruell nature with that pitiful! sight, he caused the head to be cut off, and set vpon a poles end, and so MaMawauc, ^ * head sent to sent it as a present to the king, who as then laie at Bertha.^ The ^^S. headlesse ia-ui^e he commanded to bee hoong yp vpon an high '''^'^■ paire of gaUows. . . . Thus was iustice and law restored againe jutue, to the old accustomed course, by the diligent means of Makbeth. Immediatlie wherevpion woord came that Sueno king of Norway ««««« **«» . o J of Norway was amued lu Fife with a puissant armie, to subdue the whole ^''•" realme of Scotland. The ?xiiiy ijaised to resist Sueno was divided into iiiree " battels " j the van and rear feeing assigned to Macbeth ajid Banquho respectively, — »-- while Duncan commanded the main body. The events of the sub- sequent eampaiga-^^wkLeh ended with an avierwhelming defeat of the Danes ^ — are not dram^tiz^ed. Smeno; ^ccpm|)Eviiied by 3, few survivor? of the ejcpedition, esc3,ped to |forw»y. — ffol. ii. ff. S. I69/2/61—1 70/2/4. [ffol. ii. H. S. 170/2/21.] lihe Scots hauing woone so nptable f^^^^"- a victorie, after they had gathered & diuided the spojle of the ^^ ii^d, caused solemne proeessions to be made In all pla^e? qS the realme, and thanks to be giueato almightie God, tiiat had sent them so faire a daj * ouer their enimies. But whilest the people were tiljus at their processions, woord was brought that a new fleet iSai^w ©f Danes was arriued at Kingeorne,* sent thither by Canute king fyf^^^ pf JBnglaju}, jin reuenge of his brother Suenos puerthrow. To '^^' * According to Boece {il^l^S h) the site of this town was near the modem Peprth, jfpunded by William tjb.e Jaom to ^eplape Sertha, which was ^e^troyed by an inundation in 1210. * The Scots worn the -vaotory by drmggiQg the Bajoes, who incautiojigly accepted from Duncan a present of ale and bread, compounded with " the iuice of mekilwoort Jber!rie8."m-fly Makbeth and Ban' qu7u>. resist these enimies, which were alreadie landed, and busie in spoiling the countrie, Makbeth and Banquho were sent with the kings authoritie, who hauing with them a conuenient power, incountred the enimies, slue part of them, and chased the other to their ships. They that escaped and got once to their ships, obteined of Makbeth for a great summe of gold, that such of their Danet imrUd fricnds as wcrc slaiue at this last bickering, might be buried in in S. Colmes . , ^^ i x i i Inch. samt Colmes Inch.^ Act I. sc. iii. — n. iii. — It is possible that some passages in Holinslied, describing the bewitchment of Duff King of Scots, were in Shakspere's mind when he wrote the couplets detailing the First Witch's projects of revenge upon the sea-captain whose wife had insulted her (11. 18—25). DufE could Mtsiee'^at t"^"^' "" -^^ '^- 1 49/2/2.] not slccpc in the night time by anie ™gj,^[*°y prouocations that could be deuised,^ but still fell into exceeding sweats, which by no means might be restreined. . . . But about that present time there was a murmuring amongst the people, how the king was vexed with no naturall sicknesse, but by sorcerie and magicall art, practised by a sort of witches dwelling in a towne of Murrey land, called Fores.' Becoming aware of this rumour, DufE sent certain trustworthy agents to the castle of Forres, which was held by his lieutenant Donwald, of whom we shall hear again. It chanced that a soldier in the garrison of the castle had a mistress by whom he was made acquainted with the practices and designs of her mother, who was one of the suspected witches, leagued with others for the destruction of Duff. Donwald being informed of these revelations, examined the witch's daughter, who acknowledged that what he had been told was true. Wiicha in Fora. Thewk£ha arefouTiA 03U. [Rol. ii. H. S. 149/2/S9.J Wherevpon learning by hir confes- sion in what house in the towne it was where they wrought their 1 lucheolm (S. Columba's Island), Firth of Forth. Cp. Moteheth, I. ii. 62-65 : " Sweno, the Norwayes King cranes composition ; Nor would we deigne him l)uriaU of his men, Till he disbursed, at Saint Colmes ynch. Ten thousand dollars to our general! vse." « Cp. Macheih, I. iiL 19, 20 : " Sleepe shall neyther Night nor Day Hang vpon his Pent-house Lid ; " &c. * Forres is about half way between Elgin and Nairn, and not far from the Moray Firth. did his flesh.} III. MACBETH. 23 mischiefous mysterie, he sent foorth souldiers about the middest of the night, who breaking into the house, found one of the witches rosting vpon a woodden broeh an image of wax at the fier, resem- ^« »»«»»« 0/ * " ' wax roBtmg bling in each feature the kings person, made and deuised (as is to "* '^fl"- be thought) by craft and art of the diuell : an other of them sat reciting certeine words of inchantment, and still basted the image with a certeine liquor verie busilie. The souldiers finding them occupied in this wise, tooke them i"** viiteha were ex- togither with the image, and led them into the castell, where "mined. being streictlie examined for what purpose they went about such manner of inchantment, they answered, to the end to make away y*« "^"^ ^ matter it the king : for as the image did waste afore the fire, so did the «>»/"»«*■ bodie of the king breake foorth in sweat. And as for the words [The opeu ** _ kept the of the inchantment, they serued to keepe him still waking from ^"g^^^as sleepe, so that as the wax euer melted, so did the kings flesh : by meitedTi the which meanes it should haue come to passe, that when the wax was once cleane consumed, the death of the king should immediatlie follow. I now resume the thread of Macbeth's fortunes, from the time when, according to Holinshed (Hoi. ii. H. S. I7O/2/45), a perpetual peace was established with the Danes. [JSol. ii. H. S. 170/2/52.] Shortlie after happened a strange and vncouth woonder, which afterward was the cause of much trouble in the realme of Scotland, as ye shall after heare. It fortuned as Makbeth and Banquho iournied towards Fores, where the king '^^''^J^'' then laie, they went sporting by the waie togither without other ?h°e"*®* companie, saue onelie themselues, passing thorough the woods and S^'and fields, when suddenlie in the middest of a laund,^ there met them pareiTcp. . -I .1 1 n " 11. Macb. I. iii. three women m strange and wild apparell, resemblmg creatures «.] of elder world, whome when they attentiuelie beheld, woondering much at the sight, the first of them spake and said: "All haile, mepro- " Makbeth, thane of Glammis ! " ^ (for he had latelie entered into '*™ '2»«fj that dignitie and office by the death of his father Sinell). The J^^^^f* second of them said: "Haile, Makbeth, thane of Cawderl" •'^"'•• 1 "Medio repente campo" (Boece, p. 249/42). » Glamis is five and a half miles STW. of Forfar.— BcwtMomew. 3 Cawdor Castle is five and a half miles S.W. of Nairn.— Bar*/ioJo«iew. 24 III. MACBETH. But the third said: "All haile, Makbeth, that heereafter shalt "be king of Scotland !" ^ Then Banqnho : " What manner of women " (saith he) " are you, "that seeme so little fauourable vnto me; whereas to my fellow " heere, besides high of&ces, ye assigne also the kingdome, appoint- " ing foorth nothing for me at all ? " "Yes" (saith the first of them) "we promise greater benefits vnto thee, than vnto him, for he "shall reigne in deed, but with an vnluckie end: neither shall " he leaue anie issue behind him to succeed in his place, where " contrarilie thou in deed shalt not reigne at all, but of thee those "shall be borne which shall gouerne the Scotish kingdome by long "order of continuall descent." Herewith the foresaid women A thing to vanished immediatlie out of their sight. This was reputed at wtmder at. o ^ the first but some vaine fantasticall illusion by Mackbeth and Banquho, insomuch that Banquho would call Mackbeth in iest, jMQ cSd° king of Scotland ; and Mackbeth againe would call him in sport i^S^toi] likewise, the father of manie kings. But afterwards the common fSrof ' opinion was, that these women were either the weird sisters, that manie kings. , i»i.. [The women ig (as ye would Say) the goddesses of destuue, or else some lesttSr' °' nymphs or feiries, indued with knowledge of prophesie by their fa^e^r " necromanticall science, bicause euerie thing came to passe as they o^T^^m- had spoken. For shortlie after, the thane of Cawder being con- tTtajmn. demucd at Fores of treason against the king committed : his lands, ^^ca^r" ^i'^ii'gS' ^^^ offices were giuen of the kings liberalitie to Mackbeth.^ 1 The following passage in Wyntown (VI. xviii. 13-26) gives the earliest known form of this story (about 1424) : A nycht he [Macbeth] thowcht in hys dremyng, Dat syttand he wes besyd fie Kyng [Dmican] At aSete in hwntyng ; swd 15 In-til his Leiisch had Grewhundys twi. He thowcht, auhile he wes swd syttandj He sawe threWemen by gangOnd ; And jjai Wemen r)ian thowcht he Thre Werd Systrys mdst lyk to be. 20 De fyrst he hard 'say gangand by, " Lo, yhondyr-Jje Thayne of Crwmbawchty", [Cromarty]. De to^ir Woman sayd agayne, "Of Morave [Moray] yhondyre I se.|)e Thayne." De thryd )jan sayd, " I se )je Kyng." 25 AH J)is he herd in hys dremyng. These thanedoms were afterwards conferred upon Macbeth by Duncan (U. 27, 28). 2 Cp. Macbeth, I. ii. 63-67 ; iii. 105-116. ni. MACBETH. 25 The same night after, at supper, Banquho iested with him and said : "Now Mackbeth thou hast obteined those things which the " two former sisters prophesied, there remaineth onelie for thee to " purchase that which the third said should come to passe." Where- ^«»««\ vpon Mackbeth reuduing the thing in his mind, began euen then ^t^^^^e to deuise how he might atteine to the kingdoms : but yet he *'"'''°™- thought with himselfe that he must tarie a time, which should aduance him thereto (by the diuine prouidence) as it had come to passe in his former preferment. But shortlie after it chanced Tkedmghter that king Duncane, hauing two sonnes by his wife which was the ^^j^. daughter of Siward earle of Northumberland, he made the elder ^hJi^'* of them, called Malcolme, prince of Cumberland, as it were thereby [wSm is to appoint him his successor in the kingdome, immediatlie after otcnmber- '■ '■ o ' land, and his deceasse. Mackbeth sore troubled herewith, for that he saw Macieth's ' eucceBsion by this means his hope sore hindered (where, by the old lawes of JiJthus'"'"'* the realme, the ordinance was, that if he that should succeed were ™'*°"8*" ' not (rf able age to take the charge vpon himselfe, he that was next of blood vnto him should be admitted) he began to take counsell how he might vsurpe the kingdome by force, hauing a iust quarell SI'l* so to doo (as he tooke the matter) for that Duncano did what in S^*J7t,« him lay to defraud him of all maner of title and claime, which pm. " he might in time to come, pretend Tuto the crowne.^ The woords of the three weird sisters also (of whom before ^^^^ ye haue beard) ^eatlie incouraged him herevnto, but speciallie his ^tS^t" wife lay sore vpon him to attempt the thing, as she that was verie ambitious, burnmg in vnquenchable desire to beare the name of ^^^f^^ a aueene. At length therefore, communicating his puJ^osed "*«'«■ " *^ T» 1 1 Mackbeth intent with his trustie friends, amongst whome Banquho was the f^l^'^ chiefest, vpon confidence of their promised aid, he slue the king ^^^^„^: at Enuern8,2 Qp (as some say) at Botgosuane, in the sixt yeare of "''*""*'• 1 Cp. Macbeth, I. iv. 37 ; 48 : " Kmg. ... We will eatabliah our Estate vpon Our eldest, Mdoolme ; whom we name herealteT, The Prince of Cumberland " : . . . . . . Maeb.[(mde]. The Prince of Oumberland !— that is a step On which I must fall downe, or else o?er-leape. For in my way it lyes." ' "Enuern[e]s" = Inverness. y 26 III. MACBETH. Maekbeth viurpeth the crovme. Suncanet buriall. 1046. H. B. his reigne. Then hauing a companie about him of such as he had made priuie to his enterprise, he caused himselfe to be proclamed king, and foorthwith went vnto Scone, where (by common consent) he receiued the inuesture of the kingdome according to the accustomed maner.^ The bodie of Duncane was first conueied vnto Elgine, & there buried in kinglie wise ; but afterwards it was remoued and conueied vnto Colmekill,^ and there laid in a sepulture amongst his predecessors, in the yeare after the birth of our Sauiour, 1046.* On comparing the foregoing passages with the play, the reader will observe how closely Shakspere agrees with Holiushed in regard to (1) the weird sisters' apparition and predictions ; (2) the effect on Macbeth's mind of Malcolm's recognition as Prince of Cumberland, or heir apparent ; and (3) Lady Macbeth's urgency in prompting her husband to attempt Duncan's murder. Shakspere assumed that Cawdor's treason — the nature of which is not specified by Holinshed — consisted in secretly aiding the Norwegians. Banquo's fate could not have moved our pity, if the Chronicles had been followed in making him know of, perhaps even share, Macbeth's crime ; and adherence to authority in this respect must have caused Macbeth to appear less " sinful by comparison with his old associate, who, as Shakspere repre- sents the matter, strenuously resisted those " cursed thoughts " (II, i. 8) which the weird sisters' prophecies had suggested. No particulars of Duncan's murder are given. For these Shakspere turned to the murder of King Duff by Donwald. DufE (as we have seen) suffered from the effects of witchcraft. Eegaining his former health after the witches' charm had been broken, he put to death the instigators of the sorcery practised against him. Among those thus executed were some kinsmen of Donwald, who, having vainly craved their pardon, [Hoi. ii. H. S. 150/ 1/39. J conceiued such an inward malice towards the king (though he shewed it not outwardlie at the first) that 1 Cp. Macbeth, II. iv. 31, 32 : "Sosse. . . . Then 'tis most like The Soueiaignty will fall vpon Macbeth. Macd. He is already nam'd, and gone to Scone To be inuested." ' lona. Cp. Macbeth, II. iv. 32-35 : "Basse. Where is Duncan's body 1 Macd. Carried to Colmekill, The Sacred Store-house of his Predecessors And Guardian of their Bones." ' H[ectorl B[oece's] date is wrong. Duncan was slain in 1040.— Jif. Scottus (Fertz, V. 557). III. MACBETH. 27 the same continued still boiling in his stomach, and ceased not, Dmwaid till through setting on of his wife, and in reuenffe of such '«"'«* ° ° against the vnthankeiulnesse, hee found meanes to murther the king within *'"'■ the foresaid castell of Fores where he vsed to soiourne. For the king being in that countrie, was accustomed to lie most commonlie within the same castell, hauing a speciall trust in Donwald, as a man whom he neuer suspected. But Donwald, not forgetting the reproch which his linage had susteined by the execution of those his kinsmen, whome the king for a spectacle to the people had caused to be hanged, could not but shew manifest tokens of great griefe at home amongst his familie: which his wife perceiuing, ceassed not to trauell with i>onwaid» ■^ ^' w\fe coun- him, till she vnderstood what the cause was of his displeasure. JS^a^^^^ Which at length when she had learned by his owne relation, she '^"'' as one that bare no lesse malice in hir heart towards the king, for the like cause on hir behalfe, than hir husband did for his friends, counselled him (sith the king oftentimes Tsed to lodge in his [She showed house without anie gard about him, other than the garrison of the how the , , king might castell, which was wholie at his commaiidement) to make him ^hl^iodg. awaie, and shewed him the meanes wherby he might soonest c^ae!]°™° accomplish it. Donwald thus being the more kindled in wrath by the words Sj^Sj of his wife, determined to follow hir aduise in the execution of "■'''''°""'- BO heinous an act. Whervpon deuising with himselfe for a while, which way hee might best accomplish his curssed intent, at length gat opportunitie, and sped his purpose as foUoweth. It chanced that the king vpon the dale before he purposed to depart foorth of the castell, was long in his oratorie at his praiers, and there [The night ' " jr ' before the continued till it was late in the night. At the last, comming ^'iSito' foorth, he called such afore him as had faithfuUie serued him rt^ye^ute"* in pursute and apprehension of the rebels, and giuing them heartie prayers.] thanks, he bestowed sundrie honorable gifts amongst them, of the The ung rewarded hit which number Donwald was one, as he that had beene euer f™<^- accounted a most faithfuil seruant to the king. At length, hauing talked with them a long time, he got him ^^j**^^ into his priuie chamber, onelie with two of his chamberlains, who hauing brought him to bed, came foorth againe, and then fell to 28 III. MACBETH. Hadumbn^ banketting with Donwald and his wife, who had prepared diuerse Uim mmt to i <■ i ■ banketang. dclicate dishes, and suudrie sorts of drinks for their reare supper or collation, wherat they sate vp so long, till they had charged their stomachs with such full gorges, that their heads were no sooner got to the pillow, but asleepe they were so fast, that a man might haue remooued the chamber ouer them, sooner than to haue awaked them out of their droonken sleepe. by ws^fe '^heix Donwald, though he abhorred the act greatlie in heart, ^°Tfour™f yet through instigation of his wife hee called foure of his seruants to"'SS** vnto him (whome he had made priuie to his wicked intent before, and framed to his purpose with large gifts) and now declaring Tnto them, after what sort they should worke the feat, they gladlie obeied his instructions, & speedilie going about the murther, they enter the chamber (in which the king laie) a little before ^o»«r2S* ''ocks crow, where they secretlie cut his throte as he lay sleeping, ttJoteT without anie buskling ^ at all : and immediatlie by a posterne gate they caried foorth the dead bodie into the fields, and throwing it Tpon an horsse there prouided readie for that purpose, they conuey it ynto a place, about two miles distant from the castell, where they staled, and gat certeine labourers to helpe them to turne the course of a little' riuer running through the fields there, and buriM^ *« digging a deepe hole in the chanell, they burie the bodie in the same, ramming it yp with stones and grauell so closelie, that setting the water in the right course againe, no man could perceiue that anie thing had beene newlie digged there. This they did by order appointed them by Donwald as is reported, for that the //1)odie should not be foimd, & b y bleedin g (when Donwald should be present) declare him to be guiltie of the murther. f For such an opinion men haue, that the dead corps of anie man being skine, will bleed abundantlie if the murtherer be present. But for what consideration soeuer they buried him there, they had no Thepoore sooucr finished the worke, but that they slue them whose helpe laborers are i i . i . i . i steiiw. they vsed herem, and streightwaies therevpon fied into Orknie. ^t°uLdf Donwald, about the time that the murther was in dooing, got MoSm?" Wm amongst them that kept the watch, and so continued in 1 Bustling, noise. "Nullo prope strepitu" (Boece, 222/40). III. MACBETH. 29 companie with them all the residue of the night. But in the morning when the noise was raised in the kings chamber how the king was slaine, his bodie conueied awaie, and the bed all beraied with bloud; he with the watch ran thither, as though he had knowne nothing of the matter, and breaking into the chamber, and finding cakes of bloud in the bed, and on the floore about the Drnwaid ° averie sides of it, he foorthwith slue the chamberleins, as guiltie of that f^T^- heinous murther, and then like a mad man running to and fro, he c^l? oftS ransacked euerie corner within the castell, as though it had beene the ung-s to haue scene if he might haue found either the bodie, or anie slew the two chomher- of the murtherers hid in anie priuie place : but at length oomming ^JJv rf the to the posterne gate, and finding it open, he burdened the ™"^"J- chamberleins, whome he had slaine, with all the fault, they hauing the keies of the gates committed to their keeping all the night, and therefore it could not be otherwise (said he) but that they were of counsell in committing of that most detestable murther. Finallie, such was his ouer earnest diligence in the seuere f?me^ ' ^ tTian other, inquisition and triall of the oflfendors heerein, that some of the ^^^' lords began to mislike the matter, and to smell foorth shrewd tokens, that he should not be altogither clears himselfe. But for so much as they were in that countrie, where he had the whole rule, what by reason of his friends and authoritie togither, they doubted to vtter what they thought, till time and place should better seme therevuto, and heere ypon got them awaie euerie man to his home. The circumstances of Duff's murder, related above, have their dra- matic parallels in (1) Duncan's presence as a guest in Macbeth's castle ; (2) the part taken by Lady Macbeth in urging and planning the murder ; (3) the drunken sleep of Duncan's chamberlains on the night of the murder ; (4) Macbeth's precautionary slaughter of the chamber- lains; (5) the suspicion caused by his over-acted horror when the murder was discovered. We have seen how, in Gymbelme, Shakspere used a tradition of the three Hays' prowess at the battle of Loncart, fought in the reign of Kenneth III., King of Scots. A story told of this Kenneth furnished, it has been conjectured,^ a hint for some words of Macbeth (II. ii. 35 ; 41 — 43), uttered in the first agony of remorse for Duncan's murder : 1 By Dr. Furness. See his variorum MaebeiJi, p. 359. 30 III. MACBETH. Tfu M/ng had a giliie conscience. A voUe heard by the Icing, [After hear- ing this voice the King passed a sleepless night.] Me thought I heard a voyce cry, " Sleep no more ! " , . . Still it cry'd " Sleepe no more ! " to all the House : " Glamis hath murther'd Sleepe, and therefore Cawdor " Shall sleepe no more ; Macbeth shall sleepe no more ! " In order to obtain his son's succession Kenneth had secretly poisoned his nephew Malcolm, — son of the late King Duff, — who, by Scottish law, was the rightful heir to the throne. Kenneth ruled well ; and his sole guilty deed remained undiscovered. [Hoi. ii. H. S. I58/1/9.J Thus might he seeme happie to all man, hauing the loue both of his lords and commons : but yet to himselfe he seemed most vnhappie, as he that could not but still line in continuall feare, least his wicked practise concerning the death of Malcolme Dufie should come to light and knowledge of the world. For so commeth it to passe, that such as are pricked in conscience for anie secret offense committed, haue euer an vnquiet mind. And (as the fame goeth) it chanced that a voice was heard as he was in bed in the night time to take his rest, vttering vnto him these or the like woords in effect : " Thinke "not Kenneth that the wicked slaughter of Malcolme Duffe by "thee contriued, is kept secret from the knowledge of the eternall " God : thou art he that didst conspire the innocents death, enter- " prising by traitorous meanes to doo that to thy neighbour, which "thou wouldest haue reuenged by cruell punishment in anie of " thy subiects, if it had beene offered to thy selfe. It shall there- "fore come to passe, that both thou thy selfe, and thy issue, "through the iust vengeance of almightie God, shall suffer "woorthie punishment, to the infamie of thy house and familie "for euermore. For euen at this present are there in hand secret "practises to dispatch both thee and thy issue out of the waie, " that other male inioy this kingdome which thou doost indeuour "to assure vnto thine issue." The king with this voice being striken into great dread and terror, passed that night without anie sleepe comming in his eies. All now leave the stage except Duncan's sons, Malcolm and Donalbain, who, after a brief colloquy, resolve to fly from Scotland (II. iii. 141 — 152). Holinshed says that [Hoi. ii. H. S. 171/1/73.J Malcolme Cammore and Donald III. MACBETH, 31 Bane the sons of king Duncane, for feare of their lines (which MaUoime , ^ Common they might well know that Mackbeth would seeke to bring to ^^^^ end for his more sure confirmation in the estate) fled into Cumber- SS^" land, where Malcolme remained, till time that saint Edward the fSS\ Sonne of Ethelred recouered the dominion of England from the ^mitiand!' Danish power, the which Edward receiued Malcolme by way of most friendlie enterteinment : but Donald passed ouer into Ireland, where he was tenderlie cherished by the king of that land.i Act II. sc. iv. — Boss and an old man enter and talk of certain portents connected with Duncan's murder (1 — 20). Similar occurrences attended the murder of Duff, as my next excerpt shows. [Hoi. ii. JET. S. 151/I/I2.] For the space of six moneths ^^°^ togither, after this heinous murther thus committed, there J^'o^reen appeered no sunne by day, nor moone by night in anie part of SonSs, the realme, but still was the skie couered with eontinuall clouds, So."' "" ' and sometimes such outragious winds ^ arose, with lightenings and tempests, that the people were in great feare of present destruction. . . . [Hoi. ii. H. S. 152/1/9.] Monstrous sights also that were seene within the Scotish kingdome that yeere were these : horsses ^"^^ in Louthian, being of singular beautie and swiftnesse, did eate their owne flesh, and would in no wise taste anie other meate. . . . There was a sparhawke also strangled by an Ji-'^S* owle. Neither was it anie lesse woonder that the sunne, as before is said, was continuallie couered with clouds for six moneths 1 Malcolm says : " He to England." Donalbain determines otherwise : " To Ireland, I ; our seperated fortune Shall keeps ,.vs both the safer : where we are. There's daggers in men's Smiles : the neere in blood, The neerer bloody." II. iii. 143-147. By "England" and "Ireland" the kings of those countries are, I suppose, meant. Shakspere several times uses "England" in this sense: see, for example, Macbeth, IV. iii. 43, and John, III. iv. 8. 2 Compare what Lennox says (II. iii. 59, 60), just before Duncan's murder is discovered: " The Night ha's been vnruly : where we lay, Our Chimneys were blowne downe " ; . . . fitsh. an irttU. 32 III, MACBETH. Mackbeths liberalitie. Mackbeth studUth to aduance iustice. A hinglU tncUuour. [If Macbeth had heen a lawftil king, and if he had not proved a tyrant at last, he might have been ac- counted one of the best of princes.] Makbetkg counterfeit zeale and tguitie. space. But all men vnderstood that the abhominable murther of king DuflFe was the cause heereof. . . ?■ Two months — ^the utmost dramatic time, including intervals,^ which can fairly be assigned to this play — left Shakspere no room to set forth Duncan's murderer as other than a graceless tyrant, led rapidly on from crime to crime. But the following passages witness that ten of the seventeen years of Macbeth's reign were distinguished by a just though rigorous government, harmful to none save lawbreakers and oppressors of the weak. \Hol. ii. H. S. 171/2/9.] Mackbeth, after the departure thus of Dnncanes sonnes, vsed great liberalitie towards the nobles of the realme, thereby to win their fauour, and when he saw that no man went about to trouble him, he set his whole intention to mainteine iustice, and to punish all enormities and abuses, which had chanced through the feeble and slouthfull administration of Duncane. . . . Mackbeth shewing himselfe thus a most diligent punisher of all iniuries and wrongs attempted by anie disordered persons within his realme, was accounted the sure defense and buckler of innocent people ; and hereto he also applied his whole indeuor, to cause yoong men to exercise themselues in vertuous maners, and men of the church to attend their diuine seruice according to their vocations. . . . To be briefe, such were the woorthie dooings and princelie acts of this Mackbeth in the administration of the realme, that if he had atteined therevnto by rightfull means, and continued in vprightnesse of iustice as he began, till the end of his reigne, he might well haue beene numbred amongest the most noble princes that anie where had reigned. He made manie holesome laws and statutes for the publike weale of his subiects. . . . These and the like commendable lawes ^ Makbeth caused to be put as then in vse, gouerning the realme for the space of ten yeares in equall iustice. 1 An account of the execution of Duff's murdereTS is followed by these •words : " This dreadfull end had Donwald and his wife, before he saw anie sunne after the murther was committed, and that by the appointment of the most righteous God, the creator of that heauenlieplanet and all other things, who siuFereth no crime to be vnreuenged." — Mol. ii if. 8. I5I/2/43. Cp. Macbeth, II. iv. 5-7. 2 T-A., 207, 208. ' Given in Sol. ii. H. 8. pp. 171, 172, under this heading : " Lawes made by king Makbeth set / foorth according to Hector / Boetius." • in. MACBETH. 33 Act III. sc. iii. — ^These words conclude all that is recorded in Macbeth's praise ; and we then enter -upon the second period of his reign, which is said to have begun " shortlie after " the close of his ten years of good rule. [Hoi. ii. H. iS. 172/2/24. J But this was but a counterfet zeale of equitie shewed by him, partlie against his naturall inclination, to purchase thereby the fauour of the people. Shortlie after, he began to shew what he was, in stead of equitie practising crueltie. For the pricke of conscience (as it chanceth euer in tyrants, and Makbethi such as atteine to anie estate by vnrighteous means) caused him m^dmce. euer to feare, least he should be serued of the same cup, as he had ministred to his predecessor. The woords also of the three [Heremem- weird sisters would not out of his mind, which as they promised thf wo^ls of him the kingdome, so likewise did they promise it at the same risto"* time vnto the posteritie of Banquho. He willed therefore the same Banquho, with his sonne named Fleance, to come to a supper that he had prepared for them ; which was in deed, as he had ^"JJ/'^j,j„ deuised, present death at the hands of certeine murderers, whom Sa^ he hired to execute that deed ; appointing them to meete with the 'iwLnee]. same Banquho and his sonne without the palace, as they returned to bemur- to their lodgings, and there to slea them, so that he would not |J*™'"*'^ haue his house slandered, but that in time to come he might cleare the pSaoe, himselfe, if anie thing were laid to his charge vpon anie suspicion Macbeth . , .I might be that might anse.^ heiagnut- It chanced yet, by the benefit of the darke night, that, though ^„„^„<, the father were slaine, the sonne yet, by the helpe of almightie God 'i^'^^* reseruing him to better fortune, escaped that danger ; and after- "'"^«'*- wards hauing some inkeling (by the admonition of some friends which he had in the court) how his life was sought no lesse than his fathers, who was slaine not by chancemedlie (as by the handling of the matter Makbeth woould haue had it to appeare) but euen Tpon a prepensed deuise : wherevpon to auoid further perill he ^^^^„, fled into Wales. IZj&t 1 Macbeth tells the men (III. i. 131-133), who had undertaken to slay Banquo and Fleance, that the murder " must be done to-Night, And something from the Pallace ; alwayes thought, That I require a clearenesse " : . , . D 34 III. MACBETH. [Nothing prospered with Mac- beth after Bangno's murder.] . Jifakbetha dread. SUcrueltie caused throgh feare. When the guests have retired from the supper to which Banquo had been invited, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth converse (III. iv. 128-130) : Macb. How say'st thou, that Macduff denies his person At our great bidding 1 Lady M. Did you send to him, Sir % Maeb. I heare it by the way ; but I will send : . . . Act m. sc. vi.i — Lennox enquires the issue of Macbeth's summons (11. 40-43): "Sent he to MacdufE?" And the Lord, with whom. Lennox talks, replies : He did : and with an absolute " Sir, not I," The clowdy Messenger turnes me his backe. And hums, as who should say, " You'l rue the time " That clogges me with this Answer." Macduff's refusal to personally superintend the building of Dunsinane Castle may be held to stand for the afEront which the dramatic Macbeth receives from the answer brought him by his "clowdy Messenger." This is the sole point of comparison with the following excerpt. \Hol. ii. H. S. 174/1/26.] But to returne vnto Makbeth, in continuing the historic, and to begin where I left, ye shall vnder- stand that, after the contriued slaughter of Banquho, nothing prospered with the foresaid Makbeth: for in maner euerie man began to doubt his owne life, and durst vnneth appeare in the kings presence ; and euen as there were manie that stood in feare of him, so likewise stood he in feare of manie, in such sort that he began to make those awaie by one surmized cauillation or other, whome he thought most able to worke him anie displeasure. At length he found such sweetnesse by putting his nobles thus to death, that his earnest thirst after blond in this behalfe might in no wise be satisfied : for ye must consider he wan double profit (as hee thought) hereby : for first they were rid out of the way whome he feared, and then againe his coflFers were inriched by their goods which were forfeited to his vse, whereby he might better mainteine a gard of armed men about him to defend his person from iniurie of them whom he had in anie suspicion. Further, to the end he might the more cmellie oppresse his Bubiects with all tyrantlike wrongs, he builded a strong castell 1 As to the impossibility of fixing the time of this scene, see T-A., 205. III. MACBETH. 35 on the top of an hie hill called Dunsinane, situate in Gowrie, ten rhe casuu of ., „ -11. Duntincme imles irom Perth, on such a proud height, that, standing there 6«'»''««'- aloft, a man might behold well neere all the countries of Angus, Fife, Stermond, and Ernedale,^ as it were lieng vnderneath him. This casteU, then, being founded on the top of that high hill, put the realme to great charges before it was finished, for all the stuffe necessarie to the building could not be brought yp without [Macbeth much toile and businesse. But Makbeth, being once determined ti»anes come to to haue the worte go forward, caused the thanes of each shire Dtmsmane, ^ ' ana overlools within the realme, to come and helpe towards that building, each ome"""® man his course about. castie.]. At the last, when the turne fell vnto MakduflTe, thane of Fife, to MaJcduffe ,.,,,. , . tltane of Wift build his part, he sent workemen with all needfuU prouision, and ^|°\„t*' commanded them to shew such diligence in euerie behalfe, that no comi wm- occasion might bee giuen for the king to find fault with him, in htttd"'' that he came not himselfe as other had doone, which he refused w^l seize to doo, for doubt least the king, bearing him (as he partlie vnder- stood) no great good will, would laie Tiolent hands vpon him, as he had doone vpon diuerse other. Shortlie after, Makbeth comming to behold how the worke went forward, and bicause he found not Makdufie there, he was sore ofiended, and said : MaM>ah i» offended with " I perceiue this man will neuer obeie my commandements, till he ^«*<*'«r«- " be ridden with a snaffle ; but I shall prouide well inough for him." Act rV". sc. i. — ^In the columns immediately preceding the excerpt which begins with the words " But to returne," Shakspere would find James TI.'s descent traced from Banquo.^ Part of this genealogy may have suggested the stage direction, "A shew of eight Kings" (IV. i. 111). Banquo's chief descendants, in successive generations, were : Fleance ; "Walter, " who was made lord steward of Scotland " j Alan ;■ Alexander ; John ; and Walter, who " marled Margerie Bruce daughter to king Robert Bruce, by whome he had issue king Robert the second." The lineal successors of Robert II. — first of the Stewards who wore the crown, and first in the " shew of eight Kings " — were : Robert III. (2) ; James I. (3) ; James II. (4) ; James III. (5) ; James IV. (6) ; James V. (7) ; Mary ; and James VI. (8), who, ere this play was acted, had become the first King of Great Britain and Ireland. 1 "Stermond and Emedale" are Stormont and Strathem, districts of Perthshire. 2 This descent is fictitious. Chalmers {Caledonia, i. 572-574) has deduced the Fitz-Alans and the Stewards from a common ancestor, Alan, who was a contemporary of our Henry I. 36 III. MACBETH. Makhelhs coTttfideTiee in vtizzardi [, who told nimto beware of MacduS]. [A witch told him that no man born of woman should slay him, nor should he be vanquished till Bimam Wood came to Dunsi- nane Castle.] tMaeduff resolves upon going to England, and inviting Malcolm to claita the Scottish crown, Macbeth hears of this.] ■ tynxs eies and Midas- eaves. [Macbeth had spies in every nobleman's house.] Angered by the Thane of Fife's refusal to assist personally at the building of Dunsinane Castle, Macbeth could not \Hol. ii. H. S. 174/2/4.J afterwards abide to looke vpon the said MakduiFe, either for that he thought his puissance ouer great ; either else for that he had learned of certeine wizzards, in whose words he put great confidence, (for that the prophesie had hap- pened so right, which the three faries or weird sisters had declared Tnto him,) how that he ought to take heed of Makdufie, who in time to come should seeke to destroie him. And suerlie herevpon had he put Makduffe to death, but that a certeine witch, whome hee had in great trust, had told that he should neuer be slaine with man borne of anie woman, nor ran- quished till the wood of Bernane came to the castell of Dunsinane. By this prophesie Makbeth put all feare out of his heart, supposing he might doo what he would, without anie feare to be punished for the same, for by the one prophesie he beleeued it was vnpos- sible for anie man to vanquish him, and by the other vnpossible to slea him. This Taine hope caused him to doo manie outragious things, to the greeuous oppression of his subiects. At length Makduffe, to auoid perill of life, purposed with himselfe to passe into England, to procure Malcolme Cammore to claime the crowne of Scotland. But this was not so secretlie deuised by Makduffe, but that Makbeth had knowledge giuen him thereof: for kings (as is said) haue sharpe sight like vnto Lynx, and long ears like vnto Midas. For Makbeth had, in euerie noble mans house, one slie fellow or other in fee with him, to reueale all that was said or doone within the same, by which slight he oppressed the most part of the nobles of his realme.^ Act IV. sc. ii. — Macduff's flight to England is reported to Lennox by a Lord, who enters in a previous scene (III. vi. 29-31). As soon as the witches vanish, Macbeth hears the same news from Lennox, and thereupon forms this resolve (IV. i. 150-153) : The Castle of Macduff, I will surprize ; Seize vpon Kfe ; giue to th' edge o' th' Sword His Wife, his Babes, and all vnfortunate Soules That trace him in his Line. 1 Cp. Macbeth, III. iv. 131, 132: " There's not a one of them but in his house I keepe a Seruant Feed." III. MACBETH. 37 On comparing the following passage with Act IV. sc. ii. 11. 80-85, it will be noticed that Shakspere did not allow Macbeth to personally direct the slaughter. [Hoi. ii. H. S. 174/2/37.] Imraediatlie then, being aduertised ^^^^^ whereabout Makduffe went, he came hastily with a great power ralae^but into Fife, and foorthwith besieged the castell where Makduffe lrith™t*°* dwelled, trusting to haue found him therein. They that kept the house, without anie resistance opened the gates, and suffered him to enter, mistrusting none euill. But neuerthelesse Makbeth most ^rammt crueltievaed cnieUie caused the wife and children of Makduffe, with all other Tf^L whom he found in that castell, to be slaine. Also he confiscated •''»"'''"'• the goods of Makduffe, proclamed him traitor, and confined him out of all the parts of his realme ; but Makduffe was alreadie a^Ainu, escaped out of danger, and gotten into England vnto Malcolme mtt"^ Cammore, to trie what purchase hee might make by means of his ammore. support, to reuenge the slaughter so crueUie executed on his wife, his children, and other friends. Act IV. sc. iii. — ^The dialogue which succeeds the account (quoted below) of MacdufE's meeting with Malcolm is freely paraphrased in this scene. In Holinshed the dialogue contains four clauses, namely : Malcolm's confessions of (1) incontinence, (2) avarice, (3) faithlessness, — each clause including Macduff's answers, — and (4) Malcolm's dis- avowal of his self-detraction. With these clauses compare the lines in Act rV. sc. iii., indicated by the following references : (1) 11. 57-76, (2) 76-90, (3) 91-114, (4) 114-132. \Hol. ii. H. S. 174/2/53.1 At his comming vnto Malcolme, he MaMuffes declared into what great miserie the estate of Scotland was brought, ^l^^H^ by the detestable cruelties exercised by the tyrant Makbeth, hauing ^neity?^ committed manie horrible slaughters and murders, both as well of the nobles as commons ; for the which he was hated right mortallie of all his liege people, desiring nothing more than to be deliuered of that intoUerable and most heauie yoke of thraldome, which they susteined at such a caitifes hands. Malcolme, hearing Makdnffes woords, which he vttered in verie Maimime lamentable sort, for meere compassion and verie ruth that pearsed [.whereupon his sorowfiill hart, bewailing the miserable state of his countrie, he JJf** J^* fetched a deepe sigh; which Makduffe perceiuing, began to fall ^^/"^ most eamestlie in hand with him, to enterprise the deliuering of iSms 38 III, MACBETH. title was good, and the people hated Macbeth.] [Bat, though Malcolm was Sony for his countrymen, he dissem- bled, fearing that Macdutf might be an emissary from Macbeth.] MaXcolitie Ca/mrnore hit answer. [His vices : 1. Lust.] Makdttiffes amwer. [Malcolm's 2nd vice : Avarice.] the Scotish people out of the hands of so cruell and bloudie a tyrant, as Makbeth by too manie plaine experiments did shew himselfe to be : which was an easie matter for him to bring to passe, considering not onelie the good title he had, but also the earnest desire of the people to haue some occasion ministred, whereby they might be reuenged of those notable iniuries, which they dailie susteined by the outragious crueltie of Makbeths mis- gouernance. Though Malcolme was verie sorowfuU for the oppres- sion of his countriemen the Scots, in manor as MakduflFe had declared ; yet doubting whether he were come as one that ment vnfeinedlie as he spake, or else as sent from Makbeth to betraie him, he thought to haue some further triall, and therevpon, dissembling his mind at the first, he answered as foUoweth : " I am trulie verie sorie for the miserie chanced to my countrie ' of Scotland, but though I haue neuer so great affection to relieue 'the same, yet, by reason of certeine incurable vices, which reigne ' in me, I am nothing meet thereto. First, such immoderate lust 'and voluptuous sensualitie (the abhominable founteine of all ' vices) followeth me, that, if I were made king of Scots, I should 'seeke to defloure your maids and matrones, in such wise that 'mine intemperancie should be more importable vnto you, than ' the bloudie tyrannic of Makbeth now is." Heerevnto Makduffe answered: "This suerlie is a verie euill fault, for manie noble 'princes and kings haue lost both liues and kingdomes for the 'same; neuerthelesse there are women enow in Scotland, and ' therefore follow my counsell. Make thy selfe king, and I shall 'conueie the matter so wiselie, that thou shalt be so satisfied ' at thy pleasure, in such secret wise that no man shall be aware 'thereof" Then said Malcolme, " I am also the most auaritious creature ' on the earth, so that, if I were king, I should seeke so manie ' waies to get lands and goods, that I would slea the most part ' of all the nobles of Scotland by surmized accusations, to the end ' I might inioy their lands, goods, and possessions ; . . . There- ' fore " saith Malcolme, " suffer me to remaine where I am, least, ' if I atteine to the regiment of your realme, mine vnquenchable 'auarice may prooue such that yfe would thinke the displeasures^ III. MACBETH. 39 "which nowgrieue you, should seeme easie in respectof the vnmeasur- "able outrage, which might insue through my comming amongst you." Makduffe to this made answer, how it was a far woorse fault [Maodurs than the other : " for auarice is the root of all mischiefe, and for ^^«^. tnat crime the most part of our kmgs haue beene slaine and ™?«o/on "brought to their finall end. Yet notwithstanding follow my "counsell, and take vpon thee the crowne. There is gold and "riches inough in Scotland to satisfie thy greedie desire." Then said Malcolme againe, " I am furthermore inclined to dissimula- [Malcolm's vices of) "tion, telling of leasings, and all other kinds of deceit, so that I ^'^'^ "naturallie reioise in nothing so much, as to betraie & deceiue ^*"''''» "such as put anie trust or confidence in my woords. Then sith " there is nothing that more becommeth a prince than constancie, "veritie, truth, and iustice, with the other laudable fellowship of " those faire and noble vertues which are comprehended onelie in "soothfastnesse, and that lieng vtterlie ouerthroweth the same; "you see how Tnable I am to gouerne anie prouince or region: "and therefore, sith you haue remedies to cloke and hide all the " rest of my other vices, I praie you find shift to cloke this vice "amongst the residue." Then said Makdufie : "This yet is the woorst of all, and there MaMvjra " I leaue thee, and therefore sale : Oh ye vnhappie and miserable " Scotishmen, which are thus scourged with so manie and sundrie "calamities, ech one aboue other ! Ye haue one curssed and " wicked tyrant that now reigneth ouer you, without anie right or " title, oppressing you with his most bloudie crueltie. This other, " that hath the right to the crowne,^ is so replet with the inconstant 1 In n. 108-111, Macduflf refers to the saintly parents of Malcolm, vrho was " the truest Issue " of the Scottish throne. Perhaps Shakspere transferred to Malcolm's father, and to his mother, — of whom we know nothing, — ^the virtues which Malcolm himself possessed, and which were shared with him, in larger measure, by his wife Margaret. Sol. says (ii. M. S. 178/2/44) : . . . "king Malcolme (speoiallie by the good admonishment and exhortation ^. of his wife queene Margaret, a woman of great zeale vnto the religion of Malcolme, that time) gaue himselfe m maner altogither vnto much deuotion, and workes through of mercie ; as in dooing of almes deeds, by prouiding for the poore, and such o/^^^" like godlie exercises : so that in true vertue he was thought to excel! all other gimth princes of his time. To be brief, herein there seemed to be in maner a cer- ^^^*° tejne strife betwixt him and that vertuous queene his wife, which of them ^ ^odiw" should be most feruent in the loue of God, so that manie people by the itrifi. imitation of them were brought vnto a better lifeJ' 40 III. MACBETH. MaUcdviffe weepeth. Malcolme comfortith Makdujffe^ Matcdufft & MalcolTiie inibrace ech other. [Eodward's gin of prophecy, and power of healing the king's evi].] " behauiour and manifest vices of Englishmen, that he is nothing " woorthie to inioy it ; for by his owne confession he is not onelie "auaritious, and giuen to vnsatiable lust, but so false a traitor " withall, that no trust is to be had vnto anie woord he speaketh. "Adieu, Scotland, for now I account my selfe a banished man for " euer, without comfort or consolation : " and with those woords the brackish teares trickled downe his cheekes verie abundantlie. At the last, when he was readie to depart, Malcolme tooke him by the sleeue, and said: "Be of good comfort, Makdufife, for I "haue none of these vices before remembred, but haue iested " with thee in this manner, onelie to prooue thy mind ; for diuerse "times heeretofore hath Makbeth sought by this manner of " meanes to bring me into his hands, but the more slow I haue " shewed my selfe to condescend to thy motion and request, the "more diligence shall I vse in accomplishing the same." Incon- tinentlie heerevpon they imbraced ech other, and, promising to be faithful! the one to the other, they fell in consultation how they might prouide for all their businesse, to bring the same to good effect. For the matter of the loyal digression (IV. iii. 140-159) which precedes Boss's entrance, Shakspere might have turned to Holinshed's first volume, where the subjoined account of Eadward the Confessor's miraculous gifts is to be found. [Hoi. i. K E. I95/1/50.J As hath beene thought, he was inspired with the gift of prophesie, and also to haue had the gift of healing infirmities and diseases. He vsed to helpe those that were vexed with the disease, commonlie called the kings euill, and left that vertue as it were a portion of inheritance vnto his successors the kings of this realme. The latter part of sc. iii., Act IV., from Ross's entrance, is wholly of Shakspere's invention, for, according to Holinshed, the slaughter of Lady Macduff and her children was known to MacdufE before he joined Malcolm. Act V. sec. ii.-viii. — The following excerpts illustrate the last Act of Macbeth. [Hoi. ii. H. S. 175/2/35.] Soone after, Makduffe, repairing to the borders of Scotland, addressed his letters with secret dispatch vnto the nobles of the realme, declaring how Malcolme was con- III. MACBETH. 41 federat with him, to come hastilie into Scotland to claime the crowne, and therefore he required them, sith he was right inheritor thereto, to assist him with their powers to recouer the same out of the hands of the wrongfull vsurper. In the meane time, Malcolme purchased such fauor at king ^X4kS.'' Edwards hands, that old Siward earle of Northumberland was ll^l^fb. appointed vdth ten thousand men to go with him into Scotland, to to'supp^rt' support him in this enterprise, for recouerie of his right.^ After gainst" these newes were spread abroad in Scotland, the nobles drew into The wue, 0/ two seuerall factions, the one taking part with Makbeth, and the dZiJed. other with Malcolme. Heerevpon insued oftentimes sundrie bickerings, & diuerse light skirmishes ; for those that were of Malcolmes side would not ieopard to ioine with their enimies in a pight field, till his comming out of England to their support. But after that Makbeth perceiued his enimies power to increase, by such aid as came to them foorth of England with his aduersarie Malcolme, he recoiled backe into Fife, there purposing to abide in juaibeth campe fortified, at the castell of Dunsinane, and to fight with his cSieT"* enimies, if they ment to pursue him ; howbeit some of his friends aduised him, that it should be best for him, either to make some agreement with Malcolme, or else to flee with all speed into the Makbeth u lies, and to take his treasure with him, to the end he might wage ^ ^"> «*« sundrie great princes of the realme to take his part, & reteine strangers, in whome he might better trust than in his owne subiects, which stale dailie from him ; but he had such confidence in his prophesies, that he beleeued he should neuer be ranquished, fa^iem till Birnane wood were brought to Dunsinane ; nor yet to be slaine 2'"!2'*«««»- with anie man, that should be or was born of anie woman. It has been conjectured th^t Shakspere was thinking of a later passage in the Chronicles when he made Macbeth caU Malcolm's English allies "Epicures" (T. iii. 8). Malcolm III. (Canmore), Macbeth's successor, offended his Gaelic subjects by his partiality to English ideas and manners. On his death, in 1092, his brother Donalbain — who had lived under very different conditions — came 1 Malcolm tells Macduff (IV. iu. 133-135) : ..." before thy [they F.] heere approach, Old Seyward, vnth ten thousamd warlike men, Already at a point, was setting foorth." 42 III. MACBETH. The retpeci tliat the people had to receiue Donald Sane for their king [was, that they hoped he would put down English gormandiz- ing and riotous manners]. [Malcolm comes to Bimam Wood.] Branches of trees [borne by Mal- colm's soldiers as they advance against Dunsinane]. [Macbeth remembers the pro- phecy about Birnam Wood.] Macbeth setteth his men in order iffbattell. Makbeth fijeetht A is pwrsuedqf Makdvffe. forward as the representative of the old Scottish nation, and was chosen king, in exclusion of Malcolm's sons. To a people of few wants the standard of living adopted by a more luxurious society might appear to be mere sensual indulgence ; and Donalbain owed some of his success to this feeling. [ffol. ii. E. S. I8O/1/61.] For manie of the people, abhorring the riotous maners and superfluous gormandizing brought in among them by the Englishmen, were willing inough to receiue this Donald for their king, trusting (bicause he had beene brought vp in the lies with the old customes and maners of their ancient nation, without tast of the English likerous delicats) they should by his seuere order in gouernement recouer againe the former temperance of their old progenitors. I resume the illustrative excerpts from the point where we are told of Macbeth's trust in a prophecy that he could not be slain by any man who " was borne of anie woman." [Hoi. ii. S. S. 176/i/i.J Malcolme, following hastilie after Makbeth, came the night before the battell vnto Birnane wood ; and, when his armie had rested a while there to refresh them, he commanded euerie man to get a bough of some tree or other of that wood in his hand, as big as he might beare, and to march foorth therewith in such wise, that on the next morrow they might come closelie and without sight in this manner within view of his enimies. On the morrow when Makbeth beheld them comming in this sort, he first maruelled what the matter ment, but in the end remembred himselfe that the prophesie which he had heard long before that time, of the comming of Birnane wood to Dunsinane castell, was likelie to be now fulfilled. ^ Neuerthelesse, he brought his men in order of battell, and exhorted them to doo valiantlie ; howbeit his enimies had scarselie cast from them their boughs, when Makbeth, perceiuing their numbers, betooke him streict to flight ; whom MakduflFe pursued with great hatred euen till he came 1 There are stories, belonging to other times and places, of armies bearing leafy boughs while advancing upon the forces opposed to them. See Furness's ed. of Macbeth, pp. 379-381. The removal of Bimam Wood seems, however, to have been a tradition in Wyntoim's age (fourteenth century), for he says (VI. xviii. 379, 380) : " De flyttand Wod Jjai callyd ay Dat [Bimam Wood] lang tyme eftyrehend Jiat day.'' III. MACBETH. 43 vnto Lunfannaine, where Makbeth, peroeiuing that Makduffe was J,^^°Jt*A hard at his backe, leapt beside his horsse, saieng: " Thou traitor, Ma^uff)be "what meaneth it that thou shouldest thus ia vaine follow me onibom™'^ " that am not appointed to be slaine by anie creature that is borne * '"""*°'? " of a woman 1 come on therefore, and receiue thy reward which " thou hast deserued for thy paines ! " and therwithall he lifted vp his swoord, thinking to haue slaine him. But MakdufiFe, quicklie auoiding from his horsse, yer he came at him, answered (with his naked swoord in his hand) saieng : " It an^e^that " is true, Makbeth, and now shall thine insatiable crueltie haue an bom rfMs "end, for I am euen he that thy wizzards haue told thee of: who rippedintot ' her womb.] " was neuer borne of my mother, but ripped out of her wombe : " therewithall he stept vnto him, and slue him in the place. Then ^^^^^ cutting his head from his shoulders, he set it vpon a pole, and brought it vnto Malcolme. This was the end of Makbeth, after he had reigned 17 yeeres ouer the Scotishmen. In the beginning of his reigne he accomplished manie woorthie acts, verie profitable to the common-wealth (as ye haue heard) but afterward, by illusion of the diueU, he defamed the same with most terrible crueltie. He mbt. iq. m.i was slaine in the yeere of the incarnation, 1057, and in the 16 yeere of king Edwards reigne ouer the Englishmen. 1061. H.B. i.S.B. When Earl Siward hears of his son's death, he asks : " Had he his hurts before ? " And on Eoss answering, " I, on the Front," the old warrior exclaims (Y. viii. 46-50) : Why, then Gods Soldier be he 1 Had I as many Sonnes as I haue haires, I would not wish them to a fairer death : And so, his Knell is knoll'd. This event was derived from another account of the war with Macbeth, given in Holinshed's first volume. \Hol. i. E. E. 192/1/27.] About the thirteenth yeare of king nM^wat. Edward his reigne * (as some write) or rather about the nineteenth ;^-j^7;^ or twentieth yeare, as should appeare by the Scotish writers, 1 John Mair or Major, a Scottish divine and historian, whose Historia Gentis Scotorum appeared in 1521. He died about 1549. His date (1057) for V Macbeth's death is confirmed by M. Seottus (PeHz, v. 558). 2 Eadward was crowned on Easter Day (April 3), lOiS.— AS. Chron. {M. H. B.), 434. 44 III. MACBETH. Siward the noble earle of Northumberland with a great power of horssemen went into Scotland, and in battell put to flight Mackbeth ^ that had vsurped the crowne of Scotland, and, that doone, placed Malcolme sumamed Camoir, the sonne of Duncane, sometime king of Scotland, in the gouernement of that realme, who afterward slue the said Mackbeth, and then reigned in quiet. ,. . . It is recorded also, that, in the foresaid battell, in which earle Siward vanquished the Scots, one of Siwards sonnes chanced to be slaine, whereof although the father had good cause to be sorowfull, yet, when he heard that he died of a wound which he had receiued in fighting stoutlie, in the forepart of his bodie, and that with his face towards the enimie, he greatlie reioised thereat, to heare that he died so manfuUie. But here is to be noted, that not now, but a little before (as Henrie Hunt, saith) ^ that earle Siward went into Scotland himselfe in person, he sent his sonne with an armie to conquere the land, whose hap was there to be slaine : and when his father heard the newes, he demanded whether he receiued the wound whereof he died, in the forepart of the bodie, or in the hinder part : and when it was told him that he receiued it in the forepart : " I reioise (saith he) euen with all " my heart, for I would not wish either to my sonne nor to my "selfe any other kind of death." Malcolm's closing speech (V. viii. 60-75) is illustrated by the subsequent passage, which comprises the names of several characters who appear in Macbeth. [Hoi. ii. H S. 176/1/47.] Malcolme Cammore thus recouering the relme (as ye haue heard) by support of king Edward, in the scomH* »* 16 yeere of the same Edwards reigne, he was crowned at Scone * 1 Macbeth was defeated by Siward on July 27, 1054. — AS. Ch/ron, {M. H. B., 453). Macbeth's escape from the battle is recorded in the Cottonian MS. (Tiberius, B. 1.) of the AS. Ghron. 2 Eenr. Hrnvt {M- -H"- B., 760 B) : " Circa hoc tempus [1052] Siwardus Consul fortissimus Nordhumbre . . . misit filium suum in Scotiam con- quirendam." The passage given in my excerpt from Holinshed (" whose hap was . . . kind of death ' ) is taken from Henry, who proceeds thus : " Siwardus jgitur in Scotiam proficiseens, regem beUo vioit, regnum totum destruxit, destructum sibi subjugavit." 3 Cp. the closing lines of Macbeth : " So thankes to all at once, and to each one Whom we inuite to see vs Crown'd at Scone.'' [Siward went into Scotland with an army, defeated Macbetli, and placed Malcolm on the Scottish throne.] Simon. Dun. M. Wat. [In this battle with Macbeth, a son of Siward was slain, bnt Siward re- joiced when to^d that his son's death- wound was in front.] [It is also reported that Si- ward's son invaded Scotland before this battle, and was slain, whereupon his father (hearing of the death- wound in front) said that neither of them would wish any other kind of death.] Malcolme. IV. JOHN. 45 , the 25 day of Aprill, in the yeere of ouv Lord 1057. Immediatlie ^tpZ^* after his coronation he called a parlement at Forfair, in the which he rewarded them with lands and liuings that had assisted him against Makbeth, aduancing them to fees and offices as he saw cause, & commanded that speciallie those, that bare the surname of anie offices or lands, should haue and inioy the same. He created manie earles, lords, barons, and knights. Manie of them, S^ into that before were thanes, were at this time made earles, as Fife, """'"■ Menteth, . . . Leuenox, . . . Gathnes, Rosse, and Angus. These were the first earles that haue beene heard of amongst the Scotishmen^ (as their histories doo make mention.) Manie new *»»''"»»«»• surnames were taken Tp at this time amongst them, as Cauder, . . . Seiton, . . . with manie other that had possessions giuen them, which gaue names to the owners for the time. IV. JOHN. The Shaksperian play entitled 77te M/e and death of Kmg lohn opens shortly after the King's first coronation, on Ascension Diay - (May- 27), 1199 ; and closes with his death on October 19,^ 1216. This is also the time embraced by an anonymous writer's Troubhsorm Baigne qf John King oj" England, 1591 ; a play which Shakspere has closely followed, without making any independent use of historical sources. The author of The Trovblesome Eaigne probably derived most of his historical matter from Holinshed ; from whose Chronicles the larger part of the succeeding excerpts is taken. Act I. sc. i. — ^I begin with the excerpts which form the sources of the opening scene. [Hoi. iii. 157/I/II.] lohn the yoongest son of Henrie the ■^rmoxeg.i. second was proclaimed king of England, beginning his reigne the sixt daie of April,' in the yeare of our Lord 1199. . . . This '^s- ^oued. * "Mai. . . . My Thanes and Kinsmen,. Hencefortli be Earles, the first that euer Scotland In such an Honor nam'd." ^ Or October 18. The words in M. Paris (Wendover), ii. 668, are : " Qui [Johannes] postea, in nocte quae diem sancti Lucae Evangelistae proxime secuta est, ex hac vita migravit." Coggeshale (184) says that John died about mid- night, "in festo Sancti Lucae evangelistae." ' The date of Kichard I.'s death. But John's regnal years are computed from his coronation on Ascension Day (May 27), 1199. 46 IV. JOHN. Maith. Paris. Chitum [de* livered to John by] Robert de Tumeham I, and] Saiomer. Bog. Railed. Thomaede Fumes [delivered Angiers to Artliur. Arthur ac- knowle^d in Aqjon, Maine, and looraine.] Strife amongst the English sub- iects on tJte other side of the sea. [Arthur son to Geoflfrey, elder brother to John.] [Eleanor Bti*ove to make the English swear fealty to John.] [John owed his crown chiefly to Eleanor.] man, so soone as his brother Richard was deceassed, sent Hubert archbishop of Canturburie, and William Marshall earle of Striguill (otherwise called Chepstow) into England, both to proclaime him king, and also to see his peace kept ; togither with Geflrey Fitz Peter lord cheefe iustice, and diuerse other barons of the realme ; whilest he himselfe went to Chinon where his brothers treasure laie, which was foorthwith deliuered rnto him by Robert de Turneham: and therewithall the castell of Chinon and Sawmer and diuerse other places, which were in the custodie of the fore- said Robert. But Thomas de Fumes nephue to the said Robert de Turneham deliuered the citie and castell of Angiers vnto Arthur duke of Britaine. For, by generall consent of the nobles and peeres of the countries of Anion, Maine, and Touraine, Arthur was receiued as the liege and souereigne lord of the same countries. For euen at this present, and so soone as it was knowne that king Richard was deceased, diuerse cities and townes, on that side of the sea belonging to the said Richard whilest he liued, fell at ods among themselues, some of them indeuouring to preferre king lohn, other labouring rather to be vnder the gouernance of Arthur duke of Britaine : considering that he seemed by most right to be their cheefe lord, forsomuch as he was sonne to Geffrey elder brother to lohn. And thus began the broile in those quarters, whereof in processe of time insued great iuconuenience, and finallie the death of the said Arthur, as shall be shewed hereafter. Now whilest king lohn was thus occupied in recouering his brothers treasure, and traueling with his subiects to reduce them to his obedience, queene Elianor his mother, by the helpe of Hubert archbishop of Canturburie and other of the noble men and barons of the land, trauelled as diligentlie to procure the English people to receiue their oth of allegiance to be true to king lohn. . . . [Rol. iii. 158/1/42.] And all this was doone cheeflie by the working of the kings mother, whom the nobilitie much honoured and loued. For she, being bent to prefer hir sonne lohn, left no stone vnturned to establish him in the throne, com- IV. JOHN. 47 paring oftentimes the difference of goueraement betweene a king that is a man, and a king that is but a child. For as lohn was 32 yeares old, so Arthur duke of Britaine was but a babe to speake of. . . . Surelie queene Elianor the kings mother was sore against hir nephue Arthur, rather mooued thereto by enuie conceiued against his mother, than vpon any lust occasion giuen in the behalfe of the child, for that she saw, if he were king, how his mother Constance would looke to beare most rule within the realme of England, till hir Sonne should come to lawfuU age, to gouerne of himselfe \ . . . When this dooing of the queene was signified vnto the said Constance, she, doubting the suertie of hir sonne, committed him to the trust of the French king, who, receiuing him into his tuition, promised to defend him from all his enimies, and foorthwith furnished the holds in Britaine with French souldiers. There is no historical authority for Chatillon's embassage ; nor did Philip demand that England and Ireland should be yielded to Arthur. Immediately after Richard I.'s death, Anjou, Maine, and Touraine acknowledged, as we have seen, Arthur's right, while England passed without question under the dominion of John. Such was the position of affairs at the coronation of John, shortly after which event the action of both plays begins with Chatillon's embassy. Chatillon having departed, John says (I. i. 48, 49) : Our Abbies and our Priories shall pay This expeditions charge. Faulconbridge is commissioned to wring from "hoording Abbots" the money needed (III. iii. 6-11), and afterwards we hear that he is in England, "ransacking the Church" (III. iv. 171,172). Shakspere merely tells us what the older dramatist brings on the stage, in a scene when the Bastard visits a Franciscan friary, to collect money for John. Perhaps Shakspere's precursor embellished a case recorded by Holinshed, which gave the regular clergy special ground to complain of John's harshness. In 1200 * he ordered that horses and cattle belonging to " the white moonks" (Cistercians), and left by them in his forests after October 13, should be forfeited to him. [She urged that John waBS2, Arthur hut a babe to speak of.] Queent JBlia/nors vniKTA agaimt Arthur, Oongta/ncet dutchesae ctf Britaine [would rule in England, If Arthur were king]. [Arthur entrusted by Constance to Philip's care.] 1 Eleanor to Constance (II. i. 122, 123) : « Out, insolent ! thy bastard shall be King, That thou maist be a Queen, and cheoke the world ! " 2 In 1210, after his return from an expedition rato Ireland, John extorted J100,000 from the regular clerffy and military orders. " The moonks of the Cisteaux order, otherwise called white moonks, were constreined to paie 40 thousand pounds of siluer at this time, all their priuileges to the contrarie notwithstanding."— flbl. iii. 174/2/6i (Jf. Paris, ii. 530, 531). 48 IV. JOHN. [The Cister- cians would give John nothing towards the payment of the jeso.ooo ' (30,000 marks. — CoffgeshaUt 101, 103) which he had promised Philip,] Philip king JSichards boitard son tlue the vicount of Limogei. l^Hol. iii. 162/ 1/44.] The cause that mooued the king to deale so hardlie with them was, for that they refused to helpe him with monie, when before his last going ouer into Normandie, he demanded it of them towards the paiment of the thirtie thousand pounds which he had couenanted to pay the French king. King John is then required to hear the appeal of Eobert Faulcon- bridge, who claims his paternal inheritance, on the ground that his elder brother, Philip, is illegitimate. Concerning Philip (or Eichard) Paulconbridge's historic original, Holinshed records that, in the year 1199, \Eol. iii. I6O/2/69.J Philip, bastard sonne to king Eichard,^ to whome his father had giuen the castell and honor of Coinacke, killed the vicount of Limoges, in reuenge of his fathers death, who was slaine (as yee haue heard) in besieging the castell of Chalus Cheuerell, Faulconbridge's choice is the chief subject of the scene in which he is first presented to us, and he is best remembered in connexion with this supreme moment of his life. A like choice was made by the renowned Dunois, the Bastard of Orleans, whom we meet with in the Fvrst Part of Henry VI. It is possible that the earlier dramatist (whose Faulconbridge was inherited by Shakspere) availed himself of the main situation in Dunois's case ; to which more effect was given by bringing on the stage a legitimate younger brother, who vehemently urges his right, and is supported by his mother, who is anxious to conceal her shame. These additions are, as the reader will perceive, the most important modifications in the following story, which is narrated by Halle (6th of Hen. VI., pp. 144, 145). Lewes Duke of Orleance (murthered in Paris ^ by Ihon Duke of Burgoyne) . . . was owner of the Castle of Coucy, on the Frontiers of Fraunce toward Arthoys ; whereof he made Constable the lord of Cauni, a man not so wise as his wyfe was fayre ; and 1 Mr. Watkiss Lloyd (Essays on Shdk^ere, ed. 1875, p. 196) saw a re- semblance both in name and character between Faulconbridge and Faico de Brenta or Faukes de Breautd, whom Hoi. calls Foukes de Brent. Hoi. relates how Faukes served John in the barons' war (1215-16), and afterwards aided the royalists in their struggle with Lewis. Another bastard Fauconbridge — " a man of no lesse corage then audacitie " (see illustration of 3 Hen, VI., I. i. 239), "a stoute harted manne" {Hardyng-OH'afton, 459) — was a contemporary of Edward IV. 2 In 1407. Lewis Duke of Orleans was brother to Charles VI. John Duke of Burgundy, their first cousin, is present— but does not speak — ^in Henry V. III. V. IV. JOHN. 49 yet she was not so faire, but she was aswell beloued of the duke {J^j,"^* °/ of Orleance, as of her husband. Betwene the diike and her S^^ea'ty husbande (I cannot tell who was father) she concerned a child, ofori^J*. and brought fiirth a prety boye called Ihon ; whiche chylde beynge foithrbly, of the age of one yere, the Duke disceased, and not longe after L^b^d? the mother and the lorde of Cawny ended their lyues. The next aueg^to" of kynne to the lord Oawny chalenged the enheritaunce, which bastard.) was worth four thousand crownes a yere, alledgyng that the boye was a bastard : and the kynred of the mothers syde, for to sane her honesty, it plainly denyed. In conclusion, this matter was in ffili^y' contention before the Presiderates of the parliament of Paris, and bSb™ th^ there hanged in controuersie tyll the child came to the age of .Tiij. of the™ Teres old. At whiche tyme it was demaunded of him openly of Paris, " " J. « jjj j^ when [p. 145] whose sonne he was : his frends 'of his mothers syde ^^ ™ ^ aduertised him to requyre a day, to be aduised of so great an ^^^^ answere ; whiche he asked, & to hym it was graunted. In the whwe^s™^ meane season his sayed fremdes persuaded him to claime his * ^°^' inheritauwce, as sonne to the lord of Cawni, which was an honorable liuinge, and an aimcient patrimony ; affirming that, if he said contrary, he not onely slaundered hys mother, shamed himself, & stayned hys bloud, but also should haue no lyuyng, nor any thynge to take to. The scolemaister, thinking that hys dis- ciple had well learned his lesson, & woulde reherse it according to hys instruccion, brought hym before the ludges at the daye assigned; and, when the question was repeted to him again, he boldly answered, "my harte geueth me, and my noble corage ^^l^ " telleth me, that I am the sonne of the noble Duke of Orleaunce ; ^^^ "more glad to be his Bastarde, wyth a meane liuyng, then the cSm "lawful sonne of that coward cuckolde Cauny, with hys foure lawful son, . . but the "thousande crounes [a year]. The lustices muche merueyled JJ^^®"* at his bolde answere, and his mothers cosyns detested him for shamynge of his mother; and his fathers supposed^ kinne reioysed in gayninge the patrimony & possessions. Charles, Duke of Orleance, hearynge of thys iudgement, toke hym into his family and gaue him great offices & fees, which he wel deserued, for 1 supposed father's. 50 IV. JOHN. D^of (duryag his [the Duke's] captiuitie) ^ he [Dimois] defended his "dlTfOTtte [*^® Duke's] landes, expulsed thenglishmen, & in conclusion l^v^^a procured his deliueraunce. Duke good Stow (256) has a similar story : semce,] Morgan, Prouost of Beuerley, brother to K lohn, was elected ^^. « byshop of Durham, but he comming to Borne to be consecrated, ii.f S 'ising the aduise of one William of Lane his Clarke, aunswered, tt^E^a that, for no worldly promotion^ he would deny the kings blood. Mood.] "King Kichard, says the younger Faulconbridge (I. i. 99-101), took advantage of Sir Biobert's absence in an Embassie To Germany, there, with the Emperor To treat of high affiairs touching that time. Perhaps Sir Bobert Faulconbridge usurped the mission of William Longchamp, !3ishop pf Ely and Chancellor j sent by Richard, in 1196, to confer with the Emperor Henry VI., who was anxious, to prevent, peace being made between the King and Philip of France {ffol. iii. 148/1/25), Or we may imagine that Sir Robert was one of the " diuerse Boble men " who represente.d Richard at the coronation of the Emperor Otto IV., in 1198 (ffol iii. I52/2/69). The objection, that neither of these dates is consistent with l^aulconbridge's dramatic age, need not trouble us, for Rich^ird — who, s^nt ^ Robert to Germany-r. began to reign in 1189, and Faulconbridge coqld not therefore have numbered more than ten historic years at the opening of Act I. in 1199. The Bastard would not have his mother sorrow for her w^JbiQSS> because (I. i. 268,. 269), He, that perforce r^b^ ^pns of their hearts, May easily winne a womans. A reference to a well-known story, which FSibyan thus notices (304) : It is red of this Rycharde, that, durynge y* tyme of his Inprysone- ment [in Germany], he shuld sle a lyon, & tere y' Hiarte out of his tore m'u hody, where through he shuld deserue y" name of Rycharde Cure lioa-she«rt.] ^j^ j^y^^^a _ _ 1 la Engl^odi from 1415, when he was taken prisoner at, AgiAcourt, to his. release in 1440. ^ Hoi. (iii. i56/i/6o)> gives, another reason for this name : EU ditpoii- " As he was comelie of personage, so was he of stomach more coiu-t^ous and Jj^"-^ fierce, so that, not without cause,, he obteined the surname of Oueur de lum, that is to saie, ' The lions hart.'" IV. JOHN. 61 Acts II. -III. —The historic time ftf Acts II. and III. Extends to nearly three years ; begiitiung at the inteirview of John and Philip " on the morrow after the feast of the Assumption of our ladie" (August 16), 1199, and ending "on latnioas daie" (Angtist 1), 1202, wheii Arthtif was tsikeni prisoner by John. Since these Acts contain so much warfare for the possession of Angers, I quote here Holinshed's mention of the winning of this place by Eleanor in 1199 ; and also his account of its capture by John ht 1266. iSol iii. 158/i/2S.] In [liS'S] ... his iftdthfer ^ueene Elianor, togither with capteine Marchades, entred into Anion, and wasted the salne, bicans^ ikef of that cduntfie liad receiued Arthur for th^ir sduereigue lord aiid goiteriidtii'. Aiid, amongst other townes aiid foitrdsses, they tooke the citie of Aiigiers, slue ^^TiOTf"^ inanie of the dtizens, kad conlmitted the rest to prisoti. *'''^' [Hoi. iiL 170/1/27.] [In 1206 John] entred into Anion, ^J^^'_ and, cOBlming to the citie of Afigiers, appointed certeine bands ■''"'s'*^- of bis fdotnien, & all hid light horssemen to compasse the towne about, whilest he, trith the residue of the footmen, & all the men of armes, did go to assault the gated. tVbich enterprise with fire ^^'^ and sword he so ffianfollie executed, that the gates being in a "JJ^'^ moment broken open, the citie was entered and deliiiered to the Bouldiers for a pteie. So that of the citizens some were taken, some killed, and the ii^als of the dtie beaten flat to the ground. Holinshed records nothing which warrants Constance's aspersion of Queen 'Eis&a6i'a fair fame (IL i. 129-131) : My boy a baetard' ! bjr my sbule, I thihke His fattb^r neuer was so true begot : It cannot be, and if thou wert his mother. In 1151 Eleanor was divorced by Lewis VII. of Prance, and was soon afterwards married to Henry II., — then Count of Anjou, — " contrary " (says Fabyan) " t» the e. 171] after the pope was fuUie f^^ informed of the manner of their elections, he disanuUed tliem j^*^^'*" both, and procured by his papall authoritie tbe rtioonks of Cantur- jH^m ' burie (of whome manie trere then come to Rome about that S.'"' matter) to choose one Stephan Langton the cardinal! of S. Chrysogon, an Englishman borne, and of good estimation and learning in the court of Home, to be their archbishop. . . . The king, sore oflFended in his mind tha,t the bishop of Norwich was thus put beside that dignitie, to the which he had aduahced him, . . . wrote his letters rnto the pope, giuing him to tnder- ^«»«' ^ r 1- > o o lohnwnteth stand for answer, that he would neuer consent that Stephan, which *"«■ f' ^ r r pope [, rexuB- had beene brought vp & alwaies conuersant with his enimies the ifn^n™^* Frenchmen, should now inioy the rule of the bishopiike and dioccs of Canturburie. Moreouer, he declared in the same letters, that he maruelled not a little what the pope ment, in that he did not consider how necessarie the freendship of the king of England was ^(SStJ to the see of Rome, sith there came more gains to the Romane ^a^"*"' church out of that kingdome, than out of any other realine on this side the mountaines. He added hereto, that for the liberties of Se torTh?*^ his crowne he would stand to the death, if the matter so required, the^crovn.] In 1208 Innocent, [Sol. iii. 171/2/67.] perceiuing that king lohn continued still in i^os- his former mind (which he called obstinacie), sent ouer his bulles ^^^ ^t into England, directed to William bishop of London, to Eustace cT'^mand- bishop of Mie, and to Mauger bishop of Worcester, commanding iaf jo^snd them that, vnlesse king lohn would suffer peaceablie thd ai'chbishop ^^JJ.^ ^ of Canturburie to occupie his see, and his moonks their abbie, they ^^^^ shodd put both him and [p. 172} his land vnder the sentence omupy'the of interdiction, denouncii^ him and Ms land pMnelie accufssed. ctmierbtiTy]. The bishops then had an audience of jTohn, Wh6m they warned of the charge which they had received, but he refused to obey Innocent 56 IV. JOHN. and dismissed them with threats. The interdict haying been imposed, John foresaw that Innocent might tothiaTv [ffoL iii. 172/1/65.] proceed further, and absolue all his Ire absolved subiects of theiT allegiance which they owght to him, and that his jnegianoeby lords would happiUe reuolt and forsake him in this his trouble. Innocent.] ^ '■ In the summer of the year 1211,^ ^m^'a/ \.^°^- "i- 175/1/8.] the pope sent two « legats into England, the ??^d^r"' one named Pandulph ' a lawler, and the other Durant a templer, exhorted who, commiug vuto king John, exhorted him with manie terrible manie words to leauc his stubborne disobedience to the church, and to terrible obe'H'ke*° reforme his misdooings. The king for his part quietlie heard SS^hbe"'' tbem, and, bringing them to Northampton, being not farre distant "^e^e" from the place where he met them vpon his returne foorth of yfdd!] Wales, had much conference with them ; but at length, when they perceiued that they could not haue their purpose, neither for restitution of the goods belonging to preests which he had seized vpon, neither of those that apperteined to certeine other persons, which the king had gotten also into his hands, by meanes of the controuersie betwixt him and the pope, the legats departed, i^^rad** leaning him accursed, and the land interdicted, as they found it his land j. xi. ■ • „ accursed.] at tbeu* commmg. The following passages should be compared with two speeches of Fandulph (III. i. 172-179 ; 191-194), in which he pronounces a subject " blessed" who forswears " Allegeance to aa heretique" ; and exhorts Philip, if John continue obstinate, to " raise the power of France vpon his head." poinaor. [JIol. iii. 175/2/ 17. J In the meane time pope Innocent, after the returne of his legats out of England, perceiuing that king lohn would not be ordered by him, determined, with the consent * John met the legates at Northampton, on August 30, 1211. — Arm. Waverl., 268 (cp. Ann. Burton, 209, and Itinerary, an, 13). ^ Fab. says (318) : " y" Pope sent ii. Legattys ; or, after some wryters, one Legat, named Pandulphus," . . . ' In answer to Pandulph, John, speaking with the mouth of Henry VIII., claims spiritual supremacy (III. i. 155-158). Perhaps the parallel speech in T. B. was an anachronistic development of an opinion held by a contemporary of John, a theologian named Alexander the Mason, who asserted "that it apperteined not to the pope, to haue to doo concerning the temporall possessions of any kings or other potentats touching the rule and gouernment of their subiects" (Hoi. iii. 174/i/7). IV. JOHN. * 57 of his cardinals and other councellours, and also at the instant suit w^w''* of the English bishops and other prelats being there with him, to inno™ent depriue king lohn of his kinglie state ; and so first absolued all his John, ana , exhorted subiects and vassals of their oths of allegiance made vnto the same i*"ip ""^ ° other king, and after depriued him by solemne protestation of his kinglie p^'e'X administration and dignitie, and lastlie signified that his depriua- S?^"l[|^™ tion vnto the French king and other christian princes ; admonishing eSe to i.Tii-ii'iz-i 1 Godandhig them to pursue kmg lohn, bemg thus deprmed, forsaken, and con- church."] demned, as a common enimie to God and his church. He ordeined (inoooent ' alBO con- furthermore, that whosoeuer imploied goods or other aid to van- 'tose^who quish and ouercome that disobedient prince, should remaine in o™?^ow assured peace of the church, as well as those which went to visit same the sepulchre of our Lord, not onlie in their goods and persons, were enjoyed but also in suffrages for sauing of their soules. sepuicteJ] But yet, that it might appeare to all men, that nothing could be more ioifuU vnto his holinesse, than to haue king lohn to repent his trespasses committed, and to aske forgiuenesse for the same, he appointed Pandulph, which latelie before was returned podMiph to Rome, with a great number of English exiles, to go into France, ^^^f,^ togither with Stephan the archbishop of Canturbufie, and the other JKn^r^ritiiti? English bishops ; gluing him in commandement that, repairing vnto SSo». the French king, he should communicate with him all that which he had appointed to be doone against king lohn, and to exhort the French king to make warre vpon him, as a person for his wickednesse excommunicated. Pursuing the course of history we have now reached 1212,^ but the action of the play brings us back to August 1, 1202.^ In the latter year ^ war again broke out between Prance and England, and Arthur, * The year in which John was deposed. * In a letter addressed " omnibus baronibus suis," John says that he reached Mirabeau " ad festum beati Petri ad Vinoula " (August 1), and there took Arthur prisoner. This letter, preserved by Coggeshale (137, 138), was englished by mi. (iii. 165/1/9, &cO- * Hoi. (iii. 164/1/49, &0.), citing M. Paris (ii. 477), says : " In the yeare 1202 king lohn held his Christmasse at Argenton in Normandie, and in the Lent following he and the French king met togither, neere vnto the castell of Gulleton [le Qoulet], and there in talke had betweene, he commanded king lohn with no small arroganoie, and contrarie to his former promise, to restore vnto his nephue Arthur duke of Britaine, all those lands now in his possession on that side the sea, which king lohn earnestlie denied to doo, wherevpon the French king immediatlie after began war against him," . . . )8 IV. JOHN. with the help of two hundred knights (milites) supplied him by Philip, was enabled to reduce Poitou, Touraine, and Anjou. Queen Eleanor's narrow escape from the enemies who "assayled " her in John's "Tent," and Arthur's capture (III. ii. 5-7), are dramatic versions illustrated by my next excerpts, which give the issue of Arthur's temporary success. Nens [Hoi. iii. 164/2/1 3.] Queene Elianor, that was regent in VianoT [gat _ t i» i * ™tato^ those parties, being put in great feare with the newes of this ndsentto gulden sturre, got hir into Mirabeau, a strong towne situat in the S^Jr]. countrie of Anion, and foorthwith dispatched a messenger with letters vnto king lohn, requiring him of speedie succour in this hir iithmfas present danger. In the meane time, Arthur following the victorie, 00k h^ shortlie after followed hir, and woone Mirabeau, where he tooke risoner.] y^ grandmother within the same ; whom he yet intreated verie honorablie, and with great reuerence (as some haue reported). te«j.por&>^ But other write far more trulie, that she was not taken, but IfacEA. West I ' ' 1^ that she escaped into a tower, within the which she was straitlie besieged. rtaraier]. Thither came also to aid Arthur all the Nobles and men of armes in Poictou, and namelie the . . . earle of March,^ according to appointment betwixt them : so that by this meanes Arthur had a great armie togither in the field. King lohn, in the meane time, hauing receiued his mothers letters, and vnderstanding thereby in what danger she stood, was •oiydor. maruellousUe troubled with the strangenesse of the newes, and with manie bitter words accused the French king as an vntrue prince, and a fraudulent league-breaker ; and in all possible hast gpeedeth him foorth, continuing his ioumie for the most part both r. lohn ^*y ^^'^ night to come to the succour of his people. To be briefe, ^^fc^ he vsed such diligence, that he was vpon his enimies necks yer KkedM. they could vnderstand any thing of his comming, or gesse what the matter meant, when they saw such a companie of souldiers as he brought with him to approch so neere the citie. . . . irthur'3 And hauing . . . put them [the Poitevins] all to flight, they J flilht, md [the English] pursued the chase towards the towne of Mu-abeau, aptnred.] into whidi the enimies made verie great hast to enter ; but such speed was vsed \yj the English souldiers at that present, that they 1 Hugh le Brun, Count of La Marehe. His hostility was caused by John's marriage with Isabella of AngoulSme^ who had been betrothed to Hugh. — Coggeshcde, 135. IV. JOHN. 59 entred and wan the said towne before their enimies could come neere to get into it. Great slaughter was made within Mirabeau it selfe, and Arthur, with the residue of the armie that escaped ^f^lJ^ with life from the first bickering, was taken ; who, being herevpon ^S»»«-. committed to prison, first at Falais, and after within the citie of j^^^^^ Rouen, lined not long after, as you shall heare. . . . ^'"^■ \Hol. iii. 165/ 1/3 1.] The French king, at the same time lieng in siege before Arques, immediatlie vpon the newes of this ouerthrow, raised from thence, and returned homewards, destroieng all that returned ' ° to his own came in his waie, till he was entred into his owne countrie. country.] Act IV. — The sources of Act lY. sc. i., and IV. ii., as far as I. 105, are contained in the following excerpts. The reader will observe how much the historical Arthur l difEered from the gentle, unambitious boy of the play. {Hoi. iii. I65/1/3S.] It is said that king lohn caused his Annonep.i. nephue Arthur to be brought before him at Falais, and there went to ^w *^ ° Arthur away about to persuade him all that he could to forsake his freendship fromPhmp,] and aliance with the French king, and to leane and sticke to him, being his naturall vncle. But Arthur, like one that wanted good [Arthur counsell, and abounding too much in his owne wilfuU opinion, listen, hut ' ° demanded made a presumptuous answer ; not onelie denieng so to doo, but ^jJ^J^^ also commanding king lohn to restore vnto him the realme of ^- ^'"'•'"d.i England, with all those other lands and possessions which king Richard had in his hand at the houre of his death. For, sith the same apperteined to him by right of inheritance, he assured him, except restitution were made the sooner, he should not long con- tinue quiet, King lohn, being sore mooned with such words thus ^^^^^^^ vttered by his nephue, appointed (as before is said) that he should ^^^^ be straitlie kept in prison, as first in Falais, and after at Roan i^p^'o-'^'i.] within the new castell there. Thus by means of this good successe, the countries of Poictou, Towraine, and Anion were recouered. ^^^^^ Sbortlie after, king lohn, comming ouer into England, caused |?^y^^^ himselfe to be crowned againe at Canturburie by the hands of ^g^l 1 Hei was then more than fifteen years old, havtog he#io bom 00 March 29, n%'J.—Bmediet, i. 361. The Arthur of T. M. was a jwth, if one may judge from his speeches in the scene which is the source of /owi, I V. i. ) IV. JOHN. Hubert the archbishop there, on the fourteenth day of Aprill,^ and then went backe againe into Normandie, where, immediatlie vpon fe Cog. his arriuall, a rumour was spred through all France, of the death of his nephue Arthur. True it is that great suit was made to haue Arthur set at libertie, as well by the French king, as by ivers William de Riches a valiant baron of Poictou, and diuerse other rons made ' aiae'h^ Noble men of the Britains, who when they could not preuaile in eMe"° their suit, they banded themselues togither, and, ioining in con- federacie with Robert earle of Alanson, the vicount Beaumont, William de Fulgiers, and other, they began to leuie sharpe wars against king lohn in diuerse places, insomuch (as it was thought) that, so long as Arthur lined, there would be no quiet in those parts : wherevpon it was reported that king lohn, through persua- sion of his councellors, appointed certeine persons to go Tuto sedtoput Falais, where Arthur was kept in prison, vnder the charge of 38.] Hubert de Burgh, and there to put out the yoong gentlemans eies. at Arthur But through such resistance as he made against one of the ibert'de toimeutors that came to execute the kings commandement (for uvered the Other ^ rather forsooke their prince and countrie, than they would consent to obeie the kings authoritie heerein) and such lamentable words as he vttered, Hubert de Burgh did preserue him from that iniurie ; not doubting but rather to haue thanks than displeasure at the kings hands, for deliuering him of such infamie as would haue redounded ynto his highnesse, if the yoong gentle- man had beene so cruellie dealt withall. For he considered, that king lohn had resolued vpon this point onelie in his heat and furie (which moueth men to vndertake manie an inconuenient enterprise, vnbeseeming the person of a common man, much more reprochfuU to a prince, all men in that mood being meere foolish and furious, and prone to accomplish the peruerse conceits of their ill possessed heart ; . . .) and that afterwards, ypon better aduise- 1 This must be the ceremony which John calls his " double Oorronation " (IV. ii. 40). But we leam from his Itinerary that, on April 14, 1202, he was at Orival near Bouen. John's second coronation took place on October 8, 1200. — Hoveden, iv. 139. On March 25, 1201, he was crowned for the third and last time. — Soveden, iv. 160. 2 John bade three of his sergeants (" prsecepit . . . tribus suis servienti- bus ") go to Falaise, and carry out this order. But two of the men fled his Court rather than obey him. — Coggeshale, 139. n.] IV. JOHN. 61 ment, he would both repeat himselfe so to haue commanded, and th^gMthat giue them small thanke that should see it put in execution. Ibeyed""" Howbeit, to satisfie his mind for the time, and to stale the rage orto would of the Britains, he caused it to be bruted abroad through the thanks countrie, that the kings commandement was fulfilled; and that Arthur also through sorrow and greefe was departed out of this SSJur's life. For the space of fifteene dales this rumour incessantlie ran anMunced, through both the realmes of England and France, and there was ramoi» ringing for him through townes and villages, as it had beene for ^"j^^ his funerals. France.] Historic time vanishes when, after John's barons have departed, he is informed by a messenger that the French " are all arriu'd " (IV, ii. 115) : news which transports us from 1202 to 1216. But when, after brief question, John is apprized of his mother's death on " the first of Aprill " (U. 119-121), we are borne back to 1204,^ in which year [Hbl. iii. I67/2/73.] queene Elianor the mother of king lohn [Q-Bieanor-s departed this life, consumed [p. 168] rather through sorow and anguish of mind, than of any other naturall infirmitie. The entry of Faulconbridge with Peter of Pomfret makes 1212 the historic date of 11. 132-157. [Eol. iii. I8O/1/28.] There was in this season an heremit, ^^"^ whose name was Peter, dwelling about Yorke ; a man in great f/wJ&id reputation with the common people, bicause that, either inspired wriShaue. with some spirit of prophesie, as the people beleeued, or else tomefirJ,"' hauing some notable skill in art magike, he was accustomed to 1 Eleanor died on'April 1, 1204. — Arm. Wa/verl., 256. Perhaps Shakspere chose April 1 for the day because a celestial appearance — of such sort as was believedT to forebode the departure of great persons — is mentioned under the same year, and on the same page, which contains the record of her decease. Mol. says (iii. I67/1/40): "This yeare [1204] the aire toward the north and east parts seemed to be on a bright fire1[1 the cmrora borealis, sometimes seen in our latitudes] for the space of six houres togither. It began about the first watch of the night, on the first of Aprill." The date of Constance's death — rumoured to have happened "three dayes before" (1. 123) Eleanor's — ^is not given by Hoi. According to Moveden (iv. 174) she died in 1201. Hol.'s authority for the following passage (iii. I66/1/12), from which we learn that she survived Arthur, was probably PoVyd. Verg., 267/6. " But king PhUip, after he was aduertised of Arthur's death, tooke the matter verie greeuouslie, and, vpon occasion thereof, cited king lohn to appeare before him at a certeine day, to answer such obiections as Constance the onutanee, duches of Britaine, mother to the said Arthur, should lay to his charge, touch- tu mother ing the murther of hir sonne. And bicause king lohn appeared not, he was %^^ condemned in the action, and adiudged to forfeit all that he held within the aecmetk precinct of France, as well Normandie as all his other lands and dominions." *'"«' **»■ 2 IV. JOHN. tell yrhsA should follow after. And for so much as oftentimes his saiengs prooued trae, great credit was giuen to him as to a verie )im (80 prophet : , . . This Peter, about the first of laauMie^ la&t past, had tertold '■ "^etto^ told the king that^ at the feast of the AscensioUi it should come to "eMion passe, that he should be cast out of his kingdome. And (whether, '"'^ to the intent that his words should be the better beleeued, or feredto whether vpon too much trust of his owne cunning) he oflFered him- ffier death ^^^^ ^^ Buffcr dcatii for it, if his prophesie prooued not true. led.]"^ Herevpon being committed to prison within the casteH of Coff, rilb^fei when the day by him prefixed came, without any other notable itd°ay.] damage vnto king lohn, he was, by the kings commandement, ^ htmrut drawne from the said castell vnto the towne of Warham, & there, dkisionne "8'^ hanged, togither with his sonne. Having heard Faulcofibridge's account of Petet's doings, John bids Hubert " away with " the prophet to prison. During Hubart's' absence on this business, 1216 becomes again the historic date, but when, at his return, he speaks of the five moons, time runs back to the year 1200, for under the latter date Holinshed records that [Hot. iii. I63/1/44.] About the moneth of December, there M moona. Were secue in the prouince of Yorke fine moones, one in the east, the second in the west, the third in the north, the fourth in the south, and the fift as it were set in the middest of the other ; hailing manie stars about it, and went fiue or six times incom- passii^ the other, as it were the space of one houfe, and sfaortlie after vanished awaie. I£ speeches referring to the Dauphin be excluded, the rest of Act IV. may bear the historiisal date of April, 1203^ about which tim6 Arthur disappeared. Omitting a sentence- which does not illustrate' the play, I resume ray opiotations at the point whero, in it& Idst excerpt relating to Arthur, the bell-ringing " for his funerals " is mentioned (p. 61 abov^j. [JEol. m, I65/2/43.] But when the Britains were nothing, pacified, but rather kindled more vehementKe to worke all the 1 " Sub Hfl . . . diebus,?' in the year 1212j was the time when,, according to M. Paris, Peter flourished as, a prophet; "et ^uhlice asserebat^ quod nou foret [JohaimesJ. rex in die Domiiiioee Ascensionis. piosimo secruentis nee deinceps ; sed die ilia coronam AngUse ad alium transferri piseaixit."-^M, Paris {Wendowr), ii 535. Peter's prediction must have been made after Ascension Day (May 9X 1212, and was fulfilled on the Vigil of Ascension Day (May 22), 1213, on which day John surrendered his crown to Pandulph. IV. JOHN. 63 mischeefe they could deuise, in reuenge of their souereignes death, [,^'f ^J",?^' there was no remedie but to signifie abroad againe, that Arthur crafaaT" •was as yet liuing and in health. Now when the king heard the ori&'° truth of all this matter, he was nothing displeased for that his ^^J^^ commandement was not executed, sith there were diuerse of his not dis- capteins which vttered in plaine words, that he should not find ||^g|^^ knights to keepe his castels, if he dealt so cruellie with his nephue. c™iiS^* ^^ For if it chanced any of them to be taken by the king of France v "^tm^ta or other their aduersaries, they should be sure to tast of the like tj^e^^ castles.] cup. IF But now touching the manor in verie deed of the end of this Arthur, writers make aundrie reports. Neuerthelesse certeine [Ko one it is, that, in the yeare next insuing, he was remooued from Falais Aithnr lUed, but some say vnto the casteU or tower of Rouen, out of the which there was not that, in ' attempting any that would confesse that euer he saw him go aliue. Some ^.JJj^J*''^ haue written, that, as he assaied to haue escaped out of prison, and ^^ ^^ proouing to clime ouer the wals of the castell, he fell into the tL seine, riuer of Saine, and so was drowned. Other write, that through drowned.] verie greefe and languor he pined awaie, and died of naturall sicknesse. But some afiSrme, that king lohn secretlie caused him to be murthered and made awaie, so as it is not throughlie agreed vpon, in what sort he finished his dales ; but Tcrelie king lohn was had in great suspicion,, whether worthilie or not, the lord knoweth.^ Act V. sc. i.^-Act V. opens on the Vigil of Ascension Day ^ (May 22, 1213). In the preceding year John had been deposed by !binocent, and Pandulpb was commissioned to request Philip^s armed help in effecting the dethronement (see p. 57 above). Philip [Hbl. iii. 176/2/20.] was easilie persuaded thereto of an inward hatred that he bare vnto our king, and therevpon with all diligence xuFrenei made his prouision of men, ship», munition and vittell, in purpose ?«^^«» to passe ouer into England : . . . ^^'"'■ John assembled a large fleet and army, and, in the sping of 1213, he was awaiting the French at Barham Down, Kent.* 1 Aeooxdi^g to Ann. Marg. (27) John, slew Arthur at Eouen, on April 3, 1203. 2 This date must be accepted with a reservation of dramatic time, for the words of Papdulph and John (V. i 22, 25-27 ; cp. IV. ii. 151-157) show that Act V. opena on ii«sension Day. * M. Paris (Wendover), ii. 539. John's preparations must have begun soon 64 IV. JOHN. poiydore. ^jj^j jjj 176/2/6$.] But as he lay thus readie, neere to the coast, to withstand and beat backe his enimies, there arriued Twohnighu at Douer two Templeis, who, comming before the king, declared t^reeS™ ^^^^ ^™ *^** ^^^y yifeve sent from Pandulph the popes legat, who ^oltad"^ for Ws profit coueted to talke with him ; for he had (as they propose"] affirmed) meanes to propone, whereby he might be reconciled both to God and his church, although he were adiudged, in the court of Rome, to haue forfeited all the right which he had to his kingdome. T^n'd'fh ^' ^'^'^^ '^^ l^^iDg. vnderstanding the meaning of the messengers, ™™* sent them backe againe to bring oner the legat, who incontinentlie came ouer to Douer ; of whose arriuall when the king was aduer- tised, he went thither, and receiued him with all due honour and reuerence. Now after they had talked togither a little, and cour- teouslie saluted each other (as the course of humanitie required) the legat (as it is reported) vttered these words following. I omit " The sawcie speecli of proud Pandulph, the popes lewd legat, to king lohn, in the presumptuous popes behalfe," since it was not used by either dramatist. Matthew Paris, Holinshed's authority here, enumerates four reasons ^ which moved John to submit. One, which probably had much weight, was Pandulph' s assertion — in the course of his " sawcie speech " — that Philip TheEngiish \Hol. ill. l77/i/43.] hath (as he sticketh not to protest openlie opds ofRsrsd ,— teaitjrto to the world) a charter made by all the cheefest lords of England touching their fealtie and obedience assured to him. The result of Pandulph's threats I give in my next excerpt, which should be compared with V. i. 1-4. [J5bZ. iii. 177/1/60.] These words being thus spoken by the legat, king lohn, as then vtterlie despairing in his matters, when he saw himselfe constreined to obeie, was in a great per- plexitie of mind, and as one full of thought, looked about him with a frowning countenance ; waieng with himselfe what counsell after March 3, 1213, when he issued writs for the assembly of a fleet at Ports- mouth in Mid-Lent (Mid-Lent Sunday fell on March 24). — M. P «*« no meanes would be turned from the execution of his purpose ; ^^'°- alledging that king lohn was not the lawfuU king of England, hauina first vsurped and taken it awaie from his nephue Arthur the [John an or i usurper, and lawfuU inheritour, and that now sithens, as an enimie to his owne ^^^^unV roiall dignitie, he had giuen the right of his kingdome awaie to the ^jSiuL pope (which he could not doo without consent of his nobles) and "'*"■ therefore through his owne fault he was worthilie depriued of all his kinglie honor. . . . Lewes, on the morrow following, being the 26 of Aprilli [1216], ^»^*- by his fathers procurement, came into the councell chamber, and |™*^'*« with frowning looke beheld the legat ; where by his procurator he SSS defended the cause that moued him to take vpon him this iournie miTX^ into England, disprouing not onelie the right which king lohn had Sn^ianl M. Paris (Wendover), ii. 651, 652. 70 IV. JOHN. [Failure of Lewis's pro- curators.] Cardinall Gualo commeth oner into Bnglatid, The points wherewith king lohn was charged [: John having been declared by the French peers guilty of Arthur's death, had forfeited his dominions, to which Lewis had succeeded.] to the crowne, but also alledging his owne interest, not onelie by his new election of the barons, but also in the title of his wife, whose mother the queene of Castile remained onelie aliue of all the brethren and sisters of Henrie the second, late king of England. In further illustration of V. ii. 69-102 I quote passages relating to a time not long after Lewis's arrival, and beginning when he and his English allies hoped to make their cause good through the arguments of those ambassadors who had been sent " in all hast vnto the court of Rome." [Hoi. iii. 192/i/iS.] But this auailed them not, neither tooke his excuse any such effect as he did hope it should ; for those ambassadors, that king lohn had sent thither, replied against their assertions, so that there was hard hold about it in that court : albeit that the pope would decree nothing till he hard further from his legat Gualo, who, the same time, (being aduertised of the pro- ceedings of Lewes in his iournie,) with all diligence, hasted ouer into England, and, passing through the middle of his aduersaries, came vnto king lohn, then soiourning at Glocester ; of whome he was most ioifuUie receiued, for in him king lohn reposed all his hope of victorie. Before Midsummer,^ 1216, \Hol. iii. 192/1/73.] letters came also vnto Lewes from his procurators, whom he had sent to the pope. . . . The cheefest points (as we find) that were laid by Lewes his procurators against king lohn were these : that, by the murther committed in the person of his nephue Arthur, he had beene con- demned in the parlement chamber, before the French king, by the peeres of France ; and that, being summoned to appeare, he had obstinatelie refused so to doo, and therefore had by good right forfeited not onelie his lands within the precinct of France, but also the realme of England, which was now due vnto the said Lewes, as they alledged, in right of the ladie Blanch his wife, daughter to Elianor queene of Spaine. But the pope refelled all 1 The letter from Lewis's procurators was written on or about May 10, 1216. — M. Paris (Wendover), ii. 656, 657. Lewis, "instante nativitate sancti Johannis Baptistae " (the next date given), began the siege of Dover Castle. — M. Paris {Wendover), ii. 664. IV. John, 71 such allegations as they produced for proofe hereof, & seemed to [Jfj"^"™* defend king lohns cause Terie pithilie ; but namelie, in that he was ^^^^^ vnder the protection of him as supreme lord of England. tfonT**"^ Act V. so. iii. — " Alarums " may possibly represent the decisive battle of Lincoln, fought on May 20, 1217,^ when the French and their English allies were defeated by William Marshal Earl of Pembroke, who commanded the army of the boy-king Henry III. If the general disregard of historic time in this play be remembered, such a conjec- ture is not affected by the qualification that it involves John's entry some seven months after the date which historians fix for his death. Before John leaves the field, a messenger has bidden him (V. iii. 9-11): Be of good comfort ; for the great supply, That was expected by the Dolphin heere, Are wrack'd three nights ago on Goodwin sands. Allowing for altered circumstance and antedating, we may suppose this " great supply " to be the reinforcements sent by Philip of France, about three months after the battle of Lincoln. These needful succours never reached Lewis, for [Rol. iii. 201/1/36.] the earle of Penbroke, and other the lords f^^- that tooke part with king Henrie, hauing aduertisement, that a new supplie of men was readie to come and aid Lewes, they appointed Philip de Albenie and lohn Marshall to associat with them the power of the cinque ports, and to watch for the comming ^/^^ ^^^^ of the aduersaries, that they might keepe them from landing ; who fl^f^ on saint Bartholomews ^ day set forth fro?n. Caleis, in purpose to arriue in the Thames, and so to come vp the riuer to London. Howbeit Hubert de Burgh, capiteine of the castell of Douer, togither with the said Philip de Albenie and lohn Marshall; with other such power as they could get togither of the cinque ports, hauiug not yet aboue the number of 40 ships great & small, vpon the discouering of the French fleet, (which consisted of 80 great ships, besides other lesser vessels well appointed and trimmed,) made foorth to the sea. And, first coasting aloofe from them, till f"^**;' * they had got the wind on their backs, came finallie with their '^S!fiLu maine force to assaile the Frenchmen, and, with helpe of their crossebowes and archers at the first ioining, made great slaughter of their enimies ; and so, grapling togither, in the end the English- 1 Coggeshale, 185. * August 24, 1217. — M. Paris {Wendover), iii. 26, 2 IV. JOHN. he French '■etit inquUhed, tatOu 'arii. Tuvicount fMdwM i$ameretk hApurpou TheviemaU UeOi. The EngUik wMUUe ieginfuthto ttaUIceefOie notch which Ihegkad node with Lewa. men bare themselues so manfdllie, that they vanquished the whole French fleet, and obteined a famous victorie. Act V. sc. iv. — Meltm's confession, and its result in detaching the English barons from Lewis, form the subject of this scene. The date — referred to in the following excerpt by the words " About the same tune" — is probably August, 1216.^ [Hoi. iii 193/2/6.] About the same time, or rather in the yeare last past as some hold, it fortuned that the Ticount of Melune, a French man, fell sicke at London, and, perceiuing that death was at ^hand, he called vnto him certeine of the English barons, which remained in the citie, vpon safegard thereof, and to them made this protestation : " I lament " (saith he) " your destruc- " tion and desolation at hand, bicause ye are ignorant of the perils " hanging oner your heads. For this Tnderstand, that Lewes, and "with him 16 earles and barons of France, haue secretlie swome " (if it shall fortune him to conquere this realme of England, & to " be crowned king) that he will kUl, banish, and confine all those " of the English nobilitie (which now doo serue vnder him, and "persecute theb owne king) as traitours and rebels ; and further- " more will dispossesse all their linage of such inheritances as they " now hold in England. And bicause " (saith he) " you shall not " haue doubt hereof, I, which lie here at the point of death, doo "now aflirme ynto yon, and take it on the perill of my soule, "that I am one of those sixteen that haue swome to performe "this thing: wherefore I aduise you to prpuide for your owne " safeties, and your realmes which you now destroie ; and keepe "this thing secret which I haue vttered vnto you." After this 8X>eech was vttered he streightwaies died. When these words of the lord of Melune were opened vnto the barons, they were, and not without cause, in great doubt of them- selues, for they saw how Lewes had alredie placed and set French- men in most of such castels and townes as he had gotten, the right whereof indeed belonged to them. And againe, it greened them much to vnderstand, how, besides the hatred of their prince, they were euerie sundaie and holiedaie openlie accursed in euerie 1 After recording the homage of Alexander IL King of Scote to Lewis, in August, 1216, Wendov&r (M. Paris, iL 666) dates Melun's illness as having happened "hac tempestate." IV. JOHN. 73 chnrch, so that manie of them inwardlie relented, and could haue bin contented to haue returned to king lohn, if they had thought that they should thankfuUie haue beene receined. Subsequently Holinslied observes : [Sol. iiL 197/2/40. J It is reported by writers, that amongst other things, as there were diuerse, which withdrew the hearts of ff?"*»' '-' ' Melon 8 the Englishmen from Lewes, the consideration of the confession «™'*8"^i which the * vicount of Melune made at the houre of his death, l^^^i was the principal! Act "V. sec. V. — viL — With sc. v., Act Y., the excerpts given in relation to sc. iii., Act V., should be compared. The rest of the play (save V. vii. 82-95; 101-118) is illustrated by my next quotations, which date £rom October, 1216, when John, according to Holinshed, was marching northwards, after spoiling Feterborongh and Crowland. [Hoi. iii 194/1/45.] Thus, the countrie being wasted on each hand, the king hasted forward tUl he came to Wellestreme sands, where passing the washes he lost a great part of his armie, with horsses and carriages ; so that it was iudged to be a punish- ^J^,'^ ment appointed by God, that the spoile, which had beene gotten "'■™»* and taken out of churches, abbeies, and other religious houses, should perish, and be lost by such means togither with the spoilers. Yet the king himselfe, and a few other, escaped the violence of «««. the waters, by following a good guide. But, as some haue written, i^lingbroke i ■■ i i i i i manded yf]xo auswercd : "Right deere lord, they are my woords; and ^* J "hereof I require right, and the battell against him." There was a knight also that asked licence to speake for the iStesmSf duke of Norfolke, and, obteining it, began to answer thus : "Right itBrttog- "deere souereigne lord, here is Thomas Mowbraie, duke of f;°^ "Norfolke, who answereth and saith, and I for him, that all which V. RICHARD II. 81 " Henrie of Lancaster hath said and declared (sauine the reuerence was a traitor ^ ° to Richard "due to the king and his councell) is a lie ; and the said Henri« ^ifSiii] "of Lancaster hath falselie and viokedlie lied as a false and "disloiall knight, and both hath beene, and is, a traitor against "youj your crowne, roiall maiestie, & realme. This will I proue "and defend as becommeth a loiall knight to ddo with rny bbdie " against his : right deere lord, I beseech you therefore, and your "councell, that it maie please you, in your roiall discretion, to " consider and marke, what Henrie of Lancaster, duke of Hereford, " such a one as he is, hath said." The king then demanded of the duke of Norfolke, if these were his woords; and whether he had anie more to saie. The duke of Norfolke then answered for himselfe : " Right deere sir, ^fif^e^l " true it is, that I haue receiued so much gold to paie your people Sey/r "of the towne of Calls; which I haue doone, and I doo auouch had paid the r 1-1 J' • 11 1 -1 soldiers of "that your towne of Calls is as well kept at your commandemeut caiais their *' r ,1 wages^and " as euer it was' at anie time before, and that there neuer hath ^ gooaltete "beene by anie of Calls anie complaint made vnto you of me. SolnhS- " Bight deere and my souereigne lord, for the Toiage that I made compi^nfd "mto France, about your marriage, I neuer receiued either gold he had n^ " or siluer of you, nor yet for the voiage that the duke of Aumarle JS^Bj^'^^g* " & I made into Almane, where we spent great treasure. Marie, (|) that' he "true it is, that once I laid an ambush to haue slaine the duke of ambnshfor" "Lancaster, that there sitteth; but neuerthelesse he hath par- Lancaster, " doned me thereof, and there was good peace made betwixt vs, ^JH^^ "for the which I yeeld him hartie thankes. This is- that which """J " I haue to answer, and I am readie to defend my selfe against " mine aduersarie ; I beseech you therefore of right, and to haue " the battell against him in vpright iudgement." After tills, when the king had communed with his councell a little, he commanded the two dukes to stand foorth, that their ^^gP,^^'^*. answers fflight be^ heard. The E. then caused them once againe ^^^'Xd to be asked, if they would agree and make peace togither, but S^p'S^e* they both flatlie answered that they would not : and withall the Boungbroke duke of Hereford cast downe his gage, and the duke of Norfolke WBgjgcand tooke it vp. The king, perceiuing this demeanor betwijct than, ^^,;^p„: Bware by saint lohn Baptist, that he would neuer seeke to make *'"''"* a RICHARD II. ire that peacc bctwixt them againe. And therfore sir lohn Bushie in Tt""" name of the king & his councell declared, that the king and his m.]"'® councell had commanded and ordeined, that they should haue a "oiTud*to ^^^^^ of battell appointed them at Couentrie. IT Here writers ^^f disagree about the dale that was appointed : for some sale, it was mpiM. vpon a mondaie in August ; other vpon saint Lamberts dale, TuJiT' being the seuenteenth of September ; other on the eleuenth of September : but true it is, that the king assigned them not onelie the dale, but also appointed them listes and place for the combat, and therevpon great preparation was made, as to such a matter apperteined. Nothing in this scene needs further historical illustration except Mowbray's rather equivocal answer to the charge of having been. Gloucester's murderer (I. i. 132-134) : For Glocesters death, I slewe him not 5 but (to my owne disgrace) Neglected my "sworne duety in that case. To explain these words a reference to some events in the preceding year is necessary. Towards the end of June, 1397, Gloucester, Derby (Henry Bolingbroke), Nottingham (Thomas Mowbray), and others, met at Arundel Castle, and there agreed that, on a day in the following August, they would seize and imprison the King and his uncles the Dukes of Lancaster and York, and would put to death the rest of the Bang's Council. Nottingham revealed this plot to Richard, and after- wards, by the King's order, arrested Gloucester and brought him to Calais.^ Hearing that Gloucester's guilt was proved, Richard lered [Hol iii. 489/i/64.] sent vnto Thomas Mowbraie, earle >wbray to Bpatoh marshall and of Notingham, to make the duke secrethe awaie. sretiyj rfjjg earlc prolonged time for the executing of the kings com- 'owbray sitated, maudement, though the king would haue had it doone with all lereupon ' ° ° SSmed expedition, wherby the king "conceiued no small displeasure, and n with ^ ___^ ith.] 1 September 16.— iJoi. Pari, iii. 383/ 1. " The French pami)hlet," referred to, in the sidenote, as an authority for the date, " a mondaie in August," is Trais. (17 ; 149). It belonged to John Stow. The date in Eves., 146, is St. Lambert's day. September 11. — Fab., ii. 544. Bolingbroke and Norfolk were ordered to leave the realm "dedeins le jour de.le oeptas de Seint Edward le Confessour [October 20] prochein venant." — Bot. Pari., iii. 383/2. The bur- gesses of Lowestoft informed Richard that Norfolk embarked "le Samady S October 19] proschein apres la fest de Seynt Edward, I'an de vos^re regne vynt z secounde. — Bot.Parl.,ni. 384/i. It seems (Usfc, 35 ; 149) that Bolingbroke went into exile on the feast (October 13). ^ In Trais. (3 ; 121) there is a full account of this plot to imprison Richard. V. RICHARD II. 83 sware that it should cost the earle his life if he quickly obeied not his commandement. The earle thus, as it seemed, in maner inforced, called out the duke at midnight, as if he should haue taken ship to passe ouer into England, and there in the lodging called the princes In, he caused his seruants to cast featherbeds 5Sl?dered°f Tpon him, and so smoother him to death ; or otherwise to strangle him with towiels (as some write.) This was the end of that * noble Ji^^aeter ] man, fierce of nature, hastie, wilfull, and giuen more to war than * ^m u wos to peace : and in this greatlie to be discommended, that he was J^'^s'j J^"^ euer repining against the king in all things, whatsoeuer he wished **"*■ to haue forward. . . . His bodie was afterwards with all funerall pompe conueied into England, and buried at his owne manor of Plashie within the church thwe ; in a sepulchre which he in his life P^.^'"^ ' '■ buried at time had caused to be made, and there erected. pieshey.] In October, 1399, after Richard had been deposed, and Bolingbroke had ascended the throne, Sir William Bagot, one of the late King's favourites, " disclosed manie secrets ^ vnto the which he was priuie ; and being brought on a dale to the barre [of the Commons], a bill was read in English which he had made, conteining certeine euill practises of king Richard " ; . . . The following clause formed part of Bagot's revelations : \Hol. iii. 6II/2/S9.] It was further conteined in that bill, that as the same Bagot rode on a dale behind the duke of Norfolke in the Sauoy street toward Westminster, the duke asked him what he knew of the manner of the duke of Glocester his death, and he answered that he knew nothing at all : " but the people " (quoth J^„™S" he) " doo sale that you haue murthered him." Wherevnto the duke SSSd"* sware great othes that it was vntrue, and that he had saued his ^o^X™' life contrarie to the will of the king, and certeine other lords, by he^*"*** the space of three weeks, and more ; afSrming withall, that he own*ufe^ was neuer in all his life time more affraid of death, than he was at Gloucester.] his comming home againe from Calls at that time, to the kings presence, by reason he had not put the duke to death. "And ^^°^ted " then " (said he) " the king appointed one of his owne seruants, t"put*^ "and certeine other that Fp. 5121 were seruants to other lords to to death in Norfolk's "go with him to see the said duke of Glocester put to death;" presence.] 1 See pp. 110, 111 below. , 4 V, EICHARD II. swearing that, as he should answer afore God, it was neuer his mind that he should haue died in that sort,^ but onelie for feare of the king and sauing of his owne life. ^JBtLsoii. — Gaunt, on his way to Coventry (1. 56), has visited the Ducnes^TTrloiicester. As they enter he says to her (11. 1-3) : Alas, the part I had in Woodstockes blond Doth more soUioite me than your exclaimes, To stirre against the butchers of his life ! Tn February, 1397, Richard was alarmed and angered by a rough censure from Gloucester because Brest had been surrendered to John Duke of Brittany, on the repayment of the money for which the town was a pledge. [Sol. iii. 488/i/8.] Upon this multiplieng of woords in such presumptuous maner by the duke against the, king, there kindeled such displeasure betwixt them, that it neuer ceassed to increase into flames, till the duke was brought to his end. . . . [Afterwards Richard] determined to suppresse both the duke and other of his complices, and tooke more diligent regard to the saiengs & dooings of the duke than before he had doone. And as it commeth to passe that those, which suspect anie euill, doo euer Richard decmc the worst ; so he tooke euerie thing in euill part, insomuch omplained "louceater-s ^^^^ ^® complaincd of the duke vnto his brethren the dukes of hf S's^ Lancaster and Yorke, in that he should stand against him in all mM^r things and seeke his destruction, the death of his counsellors, and ouer throw of his realme. S^Mte? °I '^^ *^o dukes of Lancaster and Yorke, to deliuer the kings hTdtk!^" mind of suspicion, made answer, that they were not ignorant, how Sn^*" their brother of Glocester, as a man sometime rash in woords, would speake oftentimes more than he could or would bring to eflect, and the same proceeded of a faithful! hart, which he bare towards the king; for that it grieued him to vnderstand, that the confines of the English dominions should in anie wise be diminished : therefore his grace ought not to regard his woords, sith he should take no hurt thereby. These persuasions quieted the king for a time, till he was informed of the practise which the 1 that soH] Hoi. ed. 1. the fort Hoi. ed. 2. V. EIOHAED II. 85 duke of Glocester had contriued (as the same went among diuerse persons) to imprison the king. For then the duke of Lancaster ^JS"* ""^ and Yorke, first reprouing the duke of Glocester for his too ^fiSer liberall talking, . . . and, perceuing that he set nothing by their ™h!ies8.] woords, were in doubt least, if they should remaine in the court ^^^ still, he would, vpon a presumptuous mind, in trust to be borne rmM(?ened out by them, attempt some outragious enterprise. Wherefore presence, they thought best to depart for a time into their countries, that court.] by their absence he might the sooner learne to stale himselfe for doubt of further displeasure. But it came to passe, that their departing from the court was the casting awaie of the duke of [Their Glocester. For after that they were gone, there ceassed not such as causes Gloucester's bare him euill will, to procure the K. to dispatch him out of the way. ™n.] The Duchess of Gloucester's reproaches (I. ii. 9-34) have more weight if, as would seem from the following excerpt, Gaunt and York were at first disposed to avenge their brother's death. [^0^. iii. 489/2/68.] The parlement was summoned to begin The lords at Westminster the 17 of September,^ and writs therevpon directed com m war- like ma/nner to euerie of the lords to appeare, and to bring with them a ^''[^f^^'^i, sufficient number of armed men and archers in their best arraie ; '^^'^^'i- for it was not knowen how the dukes of Lancaster and Yorke [a doubt ■ ■'*" '■ "' ■■ ■ .' ■ ■ ■ II I as to how would take the death of their brother, . . . Suerlie the two dukes g*""* ™« ' York would when they heard that their brother was so suddenlie made awaie, ^othw^i' they wist not what to sale to the matter, and began both to be pT^r. sorowfuU for his death, and doubtfuU of their owne states : for [They grieved fot sith they saw how the king (abused by the counsell of euill men) "^/^^"J-^ absteined not from such an heinous act, they thought he would 'orthem- lieved for isdeoth, and feared for them selves.] afterwards attempt greater misorders from time to time. There- l^'*'^^ fore they assembled in all hast great numbers of their seruants, ^^^^ freends, and tenants, and, comming to London, were receiued into *uS7hii the citie. For the Londoners were right sorie for the death of dSngi. the duke of Glocester, who had euer sought their fauour; in 'bdS**' somuch that now they would haue beene contented to haue ioined Londoners.] with the dukes in seeking reuenge of so noble a mans death, . . . 1 This Parliament was adjourned on September 29, 1397, and reassembled at Shrewsbury on January 27, 1398.— Eveg., 141, 142 ; Usk, 17 ; 123. / RICHARD II. counsel Here the dukes and other fell in counsell, and manie things l^^j. -were proponed. Some would that they should by force reuenge renge^^ t^^ duke of Glocesters death ; other thought it meet that the earles ■Mow-' Marshall and Huntington, and certeine others, as cheefe authours rs-bnt of all the mischeefe, should be pursued and punished for .their iTO^tMr belouedof \ and comfort of the commonwealth was vaded and gone. mpayaie. Dismissing all thought of Bolingbroke, Greene advises Richard to take prompt measures for the subjugation of " the rebels which stand out in Ireland " (I. iv. 37-41). Holinshed says : [Rol. iii. 496/2/70.J In this meane time 1 the king being aduer- Poit/dm-. tised that the wild Irish dailie wasted and destroied the townes 1^^"/'^ and Tillages within the English pale, and had slaine manie of the ^^^^^^^ Bouldiers which laie there in garison for defense of that [p. 497] ^'e^edi" countrie, determined to make eftsoones a voiage thither, & prepared ^oand in all things necessarie for his passage now against the spring. » Bqger fourth Earl of March was slain by the Irish on July 20, 1398.— Ujtjfc, 19; 136. "Ciyus morte cognita, Rex statuit vindicaifi personaliter mortem f jus, Hibemiensesque domare." — Wdk. ii. 229. Roger was Richard's tiieutenant in Ulster, Cpnnaught, and Meath.— (Mend. B M. P P., 19 Ric. II., 230/2/7. y V. KICHARD II. Holinshed mentions the farming of England by Eichard (1. iv. 45 ; and cp. II. i. 57-64, 109-113, 256) : [Hoi. iii. 496/1/64.] The common brute ran, that the king had 1^^ set to farme the realme of England vnto sir William Scroope, earle *'""• of Wiltshire, and then treasurer of England, to sir lohn Bushie, sir lohn Bagot, and sir Henrie Greene, knights.^ Of "blanke charters" (I. iv. 48-51) as sources of revenue, we have the following account. In 1398 a reconciliation was effected between Bichard and the Londoners,^ with whom he had been deeply offended. ;e \Hol. iii. 496/ 1 /i i.l But yet to content the kings mind, manie jrs. blanke charters were deuised, and brought into the citie, which manie of the substantial! and wealthie citizens were faine to scale, to their great charge, as in the end appeared. And the like charters were sent abroad into all shires within the realme, whereby great grudge and murmuring arose among the people : for, when they were so sealed, the kings officers wrote in the same what liked them, as well for charging the parties with paiment of monie, as otherwise. In April, 1399,' large fines were exacted from the inhabitants of seventeen counties, who had aided the Duke of Gloucester in the coup d'etat of 1387, and a new oath of allegiance was required. k [Hal. iii. 496/2/30. J Moreouer, they were compelled to put their hands and scales to certeine blankes,* wherof ye haue heard before ; in the which, when it pleased him, he might write what he thought good. Holinshed does not name the object to which the money thus raised was applied. Shakspere inferred (I. iv. 43-52) that the cost of the Irish war obliged Eichard to farm the revenues and issue blank charters. That Eichard was accused of extorting money for such a 1 Fah. (545), Mol.'s authority, says that this rumour was current in the 22nd year of Kichard's reign (June 21, 1398— June 20, 1399). ^ According to Fai. (545) this reconciliation was effected after the adjourn- ment of Parliament on September 29, 1397. Richard's ire was moved by the Londoners' opposition to " certeyne actys " of that Parliament. 3 " cito post Pascha" (March 30).— OW., 199. Cp. Wals., ii. 230, 231. * It appears from Ott, 200, and W(ds., 231, that these blank charters {alhas chartas) were contemporaneous with the fines imposed upon the counties. But according to Eves. (146, 147) these fines and blank charters were in operation, about Michaelmas, 1398. V. RICHARD II. 91 purpose"' appears from one of the articles exhibited against him in the Parliament by which he was depoBed. [-ffoZ. iii. 502/2/56.] 19 Item, the spiritualitie alledged against iTheciergy him, that he, at his going into Ireland, exacted mania notable ^'^jf^.g summes of monie, beside plate and iewels, without law or custome, ifeS!']*'' contrarie to his oth taken at his coronation. Act II. so. i.r— While Richard devised means to pay for his IrishN expedition he was entreated to visit John of Gaunt, who lay at Ely ) House, " grieuous sicke " (I. iv. 54-58). Gaunt's death is thus briefly^ recorded by Holinshed. [Sol. iii. 496/1/22.] In this meane time [Feb. 3, 1399],^ the '^^f„f duke of Lancaster departed out of this life at the bishop of Elies ^«'«»»""'- place in Holborne. The particulars of Gaunt's death (II. i. 1-138) were imagined by Shakspere, but_fQr the rest of this scea(i.i he found' some material in Holinshed. The ensuing excerpt illustrates 11. 160-162 ; 201-208. \Eol. iii. 496/1/26.] The death of this duke gaue occasion of }iat?S''of • • 11.1 ini'i 11 Bichardia mcreasme more hatred m the people of this realme toward the increased ^ * ^ because he king, for he seized into his hands all the goods that belonged to th^|^^* him, and also receiued all the rents and reuenues of his lands wMch^M which ought to haue descended vnto the duke of Hereford by ia^^xil lawfuU inheritance ; in reuoking his letters patents, which he had aiiow granted to him before, by vertue wherof he might make his t'^to^*'^ attorneis generall to sue liuerie for him, of any maner of inherit- Sli^*™* * ances or possessions that might from thencefoorth fall vnto him ; ^ ^'^- "^"^ and that his homage might be respited, with making reasonable fine : whereby it was euident, that the king meant his vtter vndooing. Shakspere had Holinshed's authority for York's resentment of such injustice, and consequent departure from Court (II. i. 163-214). [Hoi. iii. 496/1/40.] This hard dealing was much misliked of all the nobilitie, and cried out against of the meaner sort; but 1 OU. (197) says that during Lent, 1399, Richard exacted money, &c., for the Irish expedition. 2 "in crastino Purificationis beatse Maries" (Feb. Z).—Ott., 198. "in crastino Sancti Blassii" (Feb. 4).— Usfc) 23 ; 132. 8 See p. 102 below. V. EICHARD II. namelie the duke of Yorke was therewith sore mooued ; who, before ^^ this time, had borne things with so patient a mind as he could, ester's though the same touched him verie neere, as the death of his P brother the duke of Glocester, the banishment of his nephue the timent, said duke of Hereford, and other mo iniuries in great number ; as sore ° ^y which, for the slipperie youth of the king, he passed ouer for the Mtion tjmg^ ajj^ ^j(j forget aswell as he might. But now perceiuing that tence.] neither law, iustice, nor equitie could take place, where the kings wilful! will was bent vpon any wrongful! purpose, ... he thought it the part of a wise man to get him in time to a resting place, . . . •^eof Herevpon he with the duke of Aumarle his sonne went to his mis- ■■■ Zoeth house at Langlie. One of the wrongs which York had borne patiently was (II. i. 167, 168) . . . the preuention of poors BuUingbrooke About his mariadge, . . . What York refers to is thus narrated by Holinshed : [Hoi. iii. 495/2/31.] At his [Bolingbroke's] comming into France, king Charles [VI.], hearing the cause of his banishment >rdu (which he esteemed to be verie light), receiued him gentlie, and dned him houorablie interteined, in so much that he had by fauour flight obteined in mariage the onelie daughter of the duke of Berrie, ^^t Tncle to the French king, if king Richard had not beene a let in iter, if that matter ; who, being thereof certified, sent the earle of Salisburie^ re- with all speed into France ; both to surmize, by vntrue suggestion, d the ''•' heinous offences against him, and also to require the French king that in no wise he would suffer his cousine to be matched in mariage with him that was so manifest an offendor. As Eichard leaves the stage he announces his intention of sailing for Ireland ' to morrow next ' ; and appoints York " Lord gouernour of England" (II. i. 217-220). The "iusts" performed at Windsor "a little before " Richard's embarkation {Hoi. iii. 497/i/3) may be alluded to in II. i. 223 : ' > The date of Salisbury's mission was, perhaps, March, 1399. Soon after (" assez t6t apres ") his return to England, a royal proclamation directed that a tournanient should be held at Windsor. After this tournament Richard made preparations for going (" oidonna aller ") to Ireland. He left the Queen at Windsor, and went thence to Bristol (Frqis., xiv. 163, 164). V. RICfiAHD II. 93 [Hoi. iii. 497/1/8.] When these iusts were finished, the king TiuHng departed toward Bristow, from thence to passe into Ireland • »"*> ^"^bij , , ^ ' icith a great leaning the queene with hir traine still at Windesor : he appointed ""*• for his lieutenant generall in his absence his vncle the duke of caxum. Yorke : and so in the moneth of Aprill,^ as diuerse authors write, ^ork' he set forward from Windesor, and finallie tooke shipping at gt^^Tc^f Milford, and from thence, with two hundred ships, and a puissant '*f **'?«' ' power of men of armes and archers, he sailed into Ireland. Ireland. Three passages in Holinshed may have suggested to Shakspene the conversation of Northumberland, Eoss, and Willoughby (jll. 241-248), who remain on the stage after Richard's exit. Northumberland seems to glance at (11. 241-245) an act of the subservient Parliament of 1397 ; which Holinshed thus records : [Hoi. iii. 4&3/1/40.] Finallie, a generall pardon was granted ! for all offenses to all the kings subiects (fiftie onelie excepted) P^'*^ whose names he would not by anie meanes expresse, but resemed exciptea them to his owne knowledge, that when anie of the nobilitie pardon.i offended him, he might at his plesure name him to be one of the number excepted, and so keepe them still within his danger. . . . Manie other things were doone in this parfement, to the dis- pleasure of no small number of people ; namelie, for that diuerse rightfiill heires were disherited of their lands and liuings, by ^^ef"" authoritie oi the same parlement : with which wrongfuU dooings "*"*«"*«<*• the people were much offended ; so that the king, and those that were about him, and cheefe in cojuncell, came into great infamie and slander. Largo grants had been obtained from his Parliaments by Richard II. ; and the oppressive poll-tar — to which we may suppose Ross refers- — caused the commons' rebellion in 1381. Of that impost Holinshed [Hoi. iii. 428/2/36.] There was a new and strange subsidie or Agreeumi, taske granted to be leuied for the kings vse, and towards the charges of this armie that went oner into France with tiie earle of Buckingham ; to wit^ of euerie preest secular or regular, six 1 "riost Pentecosten proximo sequens" [read sequentim or understand festumj^—Eves., 148. "circa festum Pentecostes."— Ott., 200. WaTs., 231. In 1399 Whit Sunday fell on May 18. Fab. (549)— quoted by Sol. in the marginal note — gives "y" moneth of Aprell" as t&e date. UTax V. RICHARD II. shillings eight pence, and as much of euerie nunne, and of euerie man & woman married or not married, being 16 yeares of age, ,'j"' (beggers certenlie knowne onlie excepted,) foure pence for euerie iLe one. Great grudging & manie a bitter cursse followed about the leuieng of this monie, & much mischeefe rose thereof, as after it appeared. In illustration of 11. 247, 248, I quote the passage noticed above (p. 90) concerning the fines levied from seventeen shires. [Hoi. iii. 496/2/9.] Moreouer, this yeare [1399] he caused seuenteene shires of the realme, by waie of putting them to their fines, to paie no small summes of monie, for redeeming their offenses, that they had aided the duke of Glocester, the earles of Aru&dell, and Warwike, when they rose in armor against him. Mimmt The nobles, gentlemen, and commons of those shires were inforced ailed a a,lso to Tcceiue a new oth to assure the king of their fidelitie in nee as o sthe K, t™e to come ; and withall certeine prelats and other honorable M *"" personages were sent into the same shires to persuade men to this e that paiment, and to see things ordered at the pleasure of the prince : reimd and sucrlie the fines which the nobles, and other the meaner le ' M( their estates of those shires were constreined to paie, were not small,, but exceeding great, to the offense of manie. After "blanckes,"' Willoughby mentions " beneuolences " as one of the " new exactions " devised by Kichard (II. i. 250). A " benevo- lence " was — in name, at least — the conception of a later king.^ In 1473 Edward IV. was meditating an expedition to France : [Hoi. iii. 694/1/43.] But bicause he wanted monie, and could not well charge his commons with a new subsidie, for that he had receiued the last yeare great summes of monie granted to him by Vt to parlement, he deuised this shift, — to call afore him a great number ' of the wealthiest sort of people in his realme ; and to them declar- ing his need, and the requisite causes thereof, he demanded of euerie of them some portion of monie, which they sticked not to 1 Of those inhabitants of seventeen counties who paid fines to Richard in 1399, Wal$. says (ii 230, 231) : " coacti sunt Regi concedere . . . importabiles summas pecuniae, pro benevolentia sua recuperanda." Ott. says (199) : " Vocab- antur itaque tales summae, sic levatse de singulis comitatibus, h pleasawice." Cp. Hol.'s sidenote, " The paiment," &c. V. RICHARD II. 95 giue. And therefore the king, willing to shew that this their liberalitie was verie acceptable to him, he called this grant of ^J^J^jy monie, " A beneuolence " : notwithstanding that manie with grudge ?benevo- gaue great sums toward that new found aid, which of them might ^™''*' ' be called, " A maleuolence." When Willoughby demands what has become of the money thus exacted by Richard, Northumberland answers (11. 252-254) : Wars hath not wasted it, for warrde he hath not. But basely yeelded vpon compromise That which his noble auncestors atchiued with blowes. Shakspere may have been thinking of Richard's cession of Brest to John Duke of Brittany (see p. 84 above) ; a step which was censured i by Gloucester, who bluntly said to the King : [Hoi. iii. 487/2/6S.] Sir, your grace ought to put your bodie io^na®''* in paine to win a strong hold or towne by feats of war, yer you ; Ire^ylSi take vpon you to sell or deliuer anie towne or strong hold gotten rncestora' with great aduenture by the manhood and policie of your noble progenitours. Northumberland hints that deliverance is near, and, being urged to speak out, says ; I haue from le Port Blan A Bay in Brittaine receiude intelligence, That Harry duke of Herford, Rainold L. Cobham That late broke from the Duke of Exeter His brother,! archbishop late of Canterburie, Sir Thomas Erpingham, Sir John Ramston, Sir John Norbery, Sir Robert Waterton, and Francis Coines ; 284 All these well furnished by the Duke of Brittaine With eight tall shippes, three thousand men of warre, Are making hither with all due expedience. And shortly meane to touch our Northerne shore : 288 Perhaps they had ere this, but that they stay The first departing of the King for Ireland. During Richard's sojourn in Ireland, [Ebl. iii. 497/2/57.] . . . diuerse of the nobilitie, aswell prelats as other, and likewise manie of the magistrats and rulers of the cities, townes, and communaltie, here in England, perceiuing dailie how the realme drew to vtter ruine, not like to be recouered to the 1 " His brother," i. e. Eichard Earl of Arundel's brother. Ritson suggested that the missing line was taken almost literally from Hoi, 'and ran thus : "The son and heir of the late earl of Arundel."— Far. Sh. xvi. 65. 96 V. RICHAKD II. ZiSr"^ former state of wealth ^rMlest king Biebard liued and reigned, (as 7^%^ they tooke it,) deuised with great deliberation, and considerate fof^i^ aduise, to send and signifie by letters vnto duke Henriej whome r^mmt. they now called (as he was in deed) duke of Lancaster and Hereford, requiring him with all conuenient speed to conueie himselfe into England ; promising him all their aid, power, and assistance, if he, expelling K. Eichard, as a man not meet for the office he bare, would take vpon him the scepter, rule, and diademe of his natiue land and region. He, therefore, being thus called vpon by messengers and letters from his freends, and cheeflie through the earnest persuasion of Thomas Arundell,^ late archbishop of Canturburie, who . . . had beene remooued from his see, and banished the realme by king The dnke of Richards mcaus, got him downe to Britaine, togither with the said to'tt/dS' archbishop ; where he was ioifullie receiued of the duke and ofLmtcMter. ^xickeasG, and found such freendship at the dukes hands, that there were certeine ships rigged, and made readie for him, at a The dyjce of placc iu basc Britaiue ^ called Le port blanc, as we find in the his adherents chrouicles of Britaiuc ; and, when all his prouision was made gaile into i i i i. Eagimtd rcadic, he tooke the sea, togither with the said archbishop of [, starting ' 70 * himtC ^""^ Canturburie, and his nephue Thomas Arundeli, sonne and heire to the late earle of Arundeli, . . . There were also with him, Additions to Reginald lord Cobham, sir Thomas Erpingham, and sir Thomas [, giving tiie Ramston, knights, lohn Norburie, Robert Waterton^ & Francis names of ' ° Srents] Coint, csquircs : few else were there, for (as- some write) he had [Various uot past fiftcene lances, as they tearmed them in those dales, that accounts of^ iii-iii Boiing- ig to sale, men of armes, furnished and appointed as the vse then broke s ' ' ^ '■ forces.] ^g^g ^ Yet other write, that the duke of Britaine deliuered vnto Thorn. Wals. [reSSt li™ t^i'ce thousand men of warre, to attend him, and that he had £d3ooo°^° eight ships well furnished for the warre, where Fwissard yet men^ands gpgg,]j,gjUj jjyj gf thrcc. MorcoueT, wherc FMssard and also the Froissard. c^jQnides of Britaine auouch, that he should land at Plimmouth, by our English writers it seemeth otherwise : for it appearetb by waiHng. t^eir assured report, that he, approching to the shore, did not 1 Thomas Arnndel (or Fitz-Alan), was exiled on September 24, 1307.— Eves., 139. 2 La Basse Bxetagne ; lower, or western, Brittany. V. RICHAED II. 97 streight take land, but lay houering aloofe, and shewed hims^l^e {f °^|:^ now in this place, and now in that, to see what countenance was "°*e*but'* made by the people, whether they meant enuiouslie to reisist him, b^'jS?,''™' or freendlie to receiue him. pia|e8,°tiiat he might In my excerpt from the play I retain the line-order and punotu»- j^e^^^Jije tion, as well as the text, of Qi. In none of the original texts of leceiveij Richa/rd II. is mention made of " Thomas Arundell, sonne and heire to the late earle of Arundell." But the ipUowing passage shows that Thomas Arundel must have been named in a preceding line as having " late broke from the Duke of Exeter." \Hol. iii. 496/ 1/68.] About the same time, the earle of Arundels sonne, named Thomas, which was kept in tlie duke of Exeters house, escaped out of the realme, by meanes of one William Scot, mercer ; and went to his vncle Thomas Arundell, late archbishop of Canturburie, as then soiourning at CuUeu^ [Cologne]. The reader will also note tha,t Bolingbroke delayed his landing in order " to see what countenance was made by the people " ; not because he awaited, as Northumberland conjectured (II. i. 290), The first departing of the King for Ireland. This deviation from his authority accords with Shakspere's annihi- lation of time in the present, and the preceding, scene. As one day only can be allowed for both scenes, — cp. the opening of the last scene of Act I., with its close, connecting it with the first scene of Act II., — Bolingbroke could not have left England ; yet,, at the close of the present scene, we learn that he is returning from exile. Kichard's absence from England, which lasted about two months, is ignored. For it is evident that, when this scene ends, Richard had not even em- barked j and, moreover, in the next scene — between which and the present one we may admit an interval of a day or two — Greene hopes " the King is not yet shipt for Ireland " {II. ii. 42).^ Act II. sn. ii^ — The Queen enters jgotLJBughy and Bagbt. They are jomed by Greene (ITID), anT York (1. 72). When Northumber- land had told his news, he, accompanied by B«ss' and Willoughby, set forth to meet Bolingbroke (H. i. 296-300). Greene announces their flight and Bolingbroke's landing at Eavenspur (11. 49-55). Scene iL j is, in general, a dramatic version of the useless, though, doubtless,,' more formal, deliberations of the council to which' York smmnoned j Richard's favourites. [Hol. iii. 498/1/36.] When the lord gouernor, Edmimd duke of Yorke, was aduertised, that the duke of Lancaster kept still the » From Fab. 545 (an. 22 Rio. II.). " T-A., 265. H "1 98 V. EICHARB II. [When York heard that Bolingbioke might land anywhere, he called a council of war, to which the Earl of Wiltshire, Bushy, Bagot, and Greene were summoned.] [Their use- less advice to collect an army at St. Albans.] The commos denU to resist the d/yjce of lanct^ster. The duhe of Lansaster Iddeth [at Bavens- pnr] in Yorkshire, Additixms to Polychron, [Among the first who came to him Willoughby, Bos, and Beaumont.] sea, and was readie to arriue, (but where he ment first to set foot on land, there was not any that vnderstood the certeintie,) he sent for the lord chancellor, Edmund Stafford, bishop of Excester, and for the lord treasuror, William Scroope, earle of Wiltshire, and other of the kings priuie councell, as lohn Bushie, William Bagot, Henrie Greene, and lohn Russell, knights : of these he required to know what they thought good to be doone in this matter, concern- ing the duke of Lancaster, being on the seas. Their aduise was, to depart from London vnto S. Albons, and there to gather an armie to resist the duke in his landing ; but, to how small purpose their counsell serued, the conclusion thereof plainlie declared, for the most part that were called, when they came thither, boldlie protested, that they would not fight against the duke of Lancaster, whome they knew to be euill dealt withall. . . . The duke of Lancaster, after that he had coasted alongst the shore a certeine time, & had got some intelligence how the peoples minds were affected towards him, landed about the beginning of lulie ^ in Yorkshire, at a place sometime called Rauenspur, betwixt Hull and Bridlington ; and with him not past threescore persons, as some write : but he was so ioifuUie receiued of the lords, knights, and gentlemen of those parts, that he found means (by their helpe) forthwith to assemble a great number of people, that were willing to take his part. The first that came to him were the lords of Lincolneshire, and other countries adioining ; as the lords Willoughbie, Ros, Darcie, and Beaumont. The defection, or resignation, of the Earl of Worcester, which Greene next announces (11. 58-61), occurred soon after Richard's return to Wales, late in July, 1399.2 Holinshed says : [Hoi. iii. 499/2/74. J Sir Thomas Persie, earle of Worcester,* 1 On June 28, according to Usk, 24; 134. "circa festum [June 24] S. Johannis Baptistse." — Eves., 151. " circa festum [July 4] translationis sancti Martini."— Oii,, 203. 2 Eichard landed in Wales on July 22, according to Usk, 27 ; 137. Hves.'s (149) date -is July 25. In Trais. (46 ; 194) the date assigned to Richard's landing is August 13. , t,. , •. 3 We learn from one chronicle (Ott, 206, 207) that when Richard, soon after landing, withdrew to Flint,— in Eulog., iii. 381, Conway is, with more probahility, the place named,— he left his household in Worcester's care. Worcester, weeping most bitterly, broke his staff, and dismissed the royal V. RICHARD II. 99 lord [p. 500] steward of the kingS hou^e, either being so com- "^f^^^"^ manded by the king, or else vpon displeasure (as some write) for ^'^^*^th that the king had proclaimed his brother the earle of Northumber- *" «*«*'*''• land, traitor, brake his white staffe, (which is the representing signe and token of his office,) and without delaie went to duke Henrie. When the kings seruants of [the] houshold saw this (for it was doone before them all) they dispersed themselues, some into one Countrie, and some into an other. A servingman enters, and says to York : " My Lord, your son was gone [to Ireland] before I came " (II. ii. 86). When Richard was at Dublin,! [-ffoZ. iii. 497/2/29.] the duke of Aumarle, with an hundred 2%edukeof - Aumarle saile, arriued, of whose comming the king was right ioifuU ; and, ^l™*^•t^ although he had vsed no small negligence in that he came no mente]?'" sooner according to order before appointed, yet the king (as he was of a gentle nature) courteouslie accepted his excuse. Whether [His good he was in fault or not, I haue not to sale; but verelie he was doubted. greatlie suspected, that he dealt not well in tarieng so long after his time assigned. This servingman, whom York would send to Pleshey, to borrow ' 1 money from the Duchess of Gloucester, answers : " An houre before I came the Dutchesse died " (II. ii. 97). Holinshed (514/2/3) records her j death.2 _-' " What, are there no Posts dispatcht for Ireland ? " exclaims York (II. ii. 103). So Qi (1597). Q2 (1598) reads "two Posts," and Fi has " What, are there postes dispatcht for Ireland 1 " The reading of Q2 is at variance with the following excerpt from Holinshed, which shows that but one opportunity occurred of sending news to Ireland of servants. Wals. (ii. 233) says that Worcester was authorized by Richard to release them from their duties till better times should come. Frois. (xiv. 167) has a, story — to which, I suppose, Hoi. refers — that Richard, before going to Ireland, published a sentence of banishment against Northumberland and Henry Percy, and thereby angered Worcester ; who is not, however, said by Frois. to have done anything to revenge the injury. Cp. Rich, II., II. iii. 26-30. * I cannot reconcile the date when, according to Creton (Archaeol. xx. 27, 298), the campaign began, — which, after a few days, became a march to Dublin, — with the dates subsequently given by him. Hoi. (497/2/ sidenote 2), on the authority of Annales Hihemiae, a MS. printed in Pamden's Britanma, ed. 1607, p. 832, gives June 28 as the date of Richard's arrival at Dublin, and Creton says {Ibid. 45, 309) that Aumerle arrived on the same day ; a date quite irreconeilablie with Creton's subsequent scheme of time. ' The inscription on her tomb in Westminster Abbey shows that the Duchess died on October 3, 1399. 100 V. EICHARB II, Bolingbroke's landing, As Bushy soon afterwards (1. 123) remarks that " the ■winde sits faire for newes to go to Ireland," the reading " no Posts " conveys a rebuke for tardiness. \Hol. iii. 499/1/14.] But here you shall note, that it fortuned outos at the same time in which the duke of Hereford or Lancaster Frmch (whether ye list to call him) arriued thus in England, the seas were KCreton's so troubled by tempests, and the winds blew so contrarie for anie D&positvm of 1/ i. r Eiehard passagc to comc ouer foorth of England to the king, remaining TPorsix still in Ireland, that, for the space of six weeks, he receiued no weeks no to Ric^d aduertisements from thence : yet at length, when the seas became ES^iand.] calme, and the wind once turned anie thing fauourable, there came ouer a ship ; whereby the king vnderstood the manner of the dukes rwhen at arriuall, and all his proceedings till that dale in which the ship tiddn'^sS'^ departed from the coast of England : wherevpon he meant foorth- trows with to haue returned ouer into England, to make resistance would have agaiust the duke ; but through persuasion of the duke of Aumarle returned to ° ' or. bufS'erie ^^ ^^^ thought) he staied, till he might haue all his ships, and KtS^t.] other prouision, fullie readie for his passage. My next excerpt shows how, after attending the fruitless council mentioned above (p, 98), Richard's evil counsellors took to flight. (Cp. II. ii. 135— 14;1.) [Hoi. iii. 498/i/s6.] The lord treasurer, Bushie, Bagot, and [Perceiving Grceue, pcrceiuiug that the commons would cleaue vnto, and take mona' njnd, part With, the dukc, slippcd awaie ; leaning the lord gouernour of escap^to the realme, and the lord chancellor, to make what shift they could Greme'tOTk fo"" themselues. Bagot got him to Chester, and so escaped into Bri^atoi™ Ireland ; the other fled to the castell of Bristow,^ in hope there to Castle,] , . n ,. be m satetie. Act II. sc. iii. — The scene is laid near Berkeley Castle (11. 51-53) ; andTaTtneexc^t given below proves, can be dated Sunday, July, 27,, 1399, St. James's Day (July 25) having, in that year, fallen on a Friday.2 [Hoi. iii. 498/2/3. J At his [Bolingbroke's] comming vnto Doncaster, the earle of Northumberland, and his sonne, sir Henrie 1 The swift action of the play establishes the Lord Treasurer (Earl of Wiltshire) in Bristol Castle before Eichard's favourites separate. Cp. II. ii. 135, 136. 2 The authority for this date is Eves., 152. V, RICHARD II. lOl Persie, wardens of the marches against Scotland, with the earle of The duke »/ Westmerland, came vnto him; where he sware vrtto those Idrds «thtam ' Uyrdt that that he would demand no more, but the lands that were to him "'tilS— descended by inheritance from his father,^ and in right of his wife. T^pr^™ Moreouer, he mdertooke to cause the paiinent of taxes and fJSeritanoe. tallages to be laid downe, & to bring the king to good g6uefnment, promised & to remooue from him the Cheshire men, which were enuied of !^"?.* ' taxation ; manie ; for that the king esteemed of theiin more than of anie BicfeiS°*' other; happilie, bicause they were more faithful! to him than ffi™ other, readie in all respects to obeift his commandements and disband the 1 T-i T-v 1 ■ Cheshire- pleasure. £ rom Doncaster, haumg now got a mightie armie about ™™J him, he marched foorth with all speed through the countries, [He marched , T-. 1 fromDon- commmg by Eu«sham viito Berkelie : within the space of three ^^^ *<> dales, all the kings castels in those parts were surrendred vnto him. The duke of Yorke, whome king Richard had left as gouernour of the realme in his absence, hejiring that his nephue the duke of Lancaster was thus arriued, and had gathered an armie, he also assembled a puissant power of men of armes and archers ; (as tu hmu of ,, ihecommont before yee haue heard ;) but all was m VElme, for there was not a ^^ouebent ■' ;', ' to the duke of man that wilUuglie would thrust out one arrow against the duke of f?'^'"'' Lancaster, or his partakers, or in anie wise offend him or his Sdtera freends. The duke of Yorke, therefore, passing foorth towards %ht with Wales to meet the king, at his commiilg' foorth of Ireland, was reoeiued into the castell of Berkelie, and' there remained, till the ?"*■"* ' ' Berkeley comming thither of the duke of Lancaster, [to] whom (when he <^"^*'®J perceiued that he was not able to resist, on the sundaie, after the feast of saint lames, which, as that yeare came about, fell vpon the fridaie) he came foorth into the church that stood without the ' Cp. Northumberland's words (II. iii. 148, 149) : " The noble Duke hath swome his comming is But for his owne ; " . . . Cp. also what Hotspur (1 Hen. IV., IV. iii. 60-65), and Worcester (1 Em. IV.,_ V. i. 41-46), afterwards said about Bolingbroke's oath. The charge of having transgressed this liniitation, ratified by oath at Doncaster, is'coiitMned in the first article of the Pereies' "quarell" ; a document presented td Henry IV. on the day before the battle of' Shrewsbury. — Hard., 352. But it' appears frbm the excerpt quoted in! the text that Shakspere wronged Bolingbroke, who undertook national reformation also. flock to Boling- broke.] 102 V. RICHARD 11. [Meeting of castell, and there communed with the duke of Lancaster. With BolmgbroKe and York.] the duke of T?orke were the bishop of Norwich, the lord Berkelie, [Names of l * i those who the lord Seimour, and other: with the duke of Lancaster were were with ' York.] these: Thomas Arundell, archbishop of Canturburie, (that had those who bccne banished.) the abbat of Leicester, the earles of Northumber- werewlth B. ' a o ^ which the duke of Lancaster had got togither agamst him ; Thorn. Wall, wherewith he was maruellouslie amazed, knowing certeinelie that those, which were thus in armes with the duke of Lancaster against him, would rather die than giue place, as well for the \^lg hatred as feare which they had conceiued at him. Neuerthe- he went to' Icssc he, departing from Barclowlie, hasted with all speed towards Conwaie, where he vnderstoode the earle of Salisburie to be Additumato gtiU remaining. Polychron. ° He therefore taking with him such Cheshire men as he had with him at that present (in whom all his trust was reposed) he doubted not to reuenge himselfe of his aduersaries, & so at the [News came first he passed with a good courage ; but when he vnderstood, thl^oft'of ^^ ^® went thus forward, that all the castels, euen from the commorS,* bordcrs of Scotland Tuto Bristow, were deliuered vnto the duke of behe^lngof Lancaster; and that likewise the nobles and commons, as well ciiiorsat of the south parts, as the north, were fuUie bent to take part Bristol.] . . . . with the same duke against him ; and further, hearing how his K. RiciMTd, trustie councellors had lost their heads at Bristow, he became so dLlaire, greatlic discomforted, that sorowfullie lamenting his miserable Boidierato state, he vtterlie despaired of his owne safetie, and calling his return to ' _ » o theirhomes.] armic togithcr, which was not small, licenced euerie man to depart to his home. ' " Castrum de Hertlowli in Wallia."— JJws., 149. Williams {Trms. 188, note) supposed this place to be Harlech Castle, Merionethshire. According to Usk (27 ; 137), and the text of Trms. (41 ; 188), Eichaxd landed at Pembroke. The Lebaud and Ambassade MSS. of Trais. (Trais. 41, note 6), Creton (Archaeol.xx.lS ; 321), and Ott. (206) have Milford as Eichard's landing-place. V. EICHAED II. 107 The souldiers, being well bent to fight in his defense, besought [Though mm to be of good cheere, promising with an oth to stand with him 1"^^,*^ against the duke, and all his partakers vnto death ; but this could ^'^^i^^ard not incourage him at all, so that, in the night next insuing, he amaufnm stole from his armie, and, with the dukes of Excester and emdtSih Surrie, the bishop of Carleill, and sir Stephan Scroope, and about J«»«. halfe a score others, he got him to the castell of Conwaie,^ where he found the earle of Salisburie ; determining there to hold himseUe, till he might see the world at some better stale ; for what counsell to take to remedie the mischeefe thus pressing vpon him he wist not. Act III, sc. iii. — The scene is laid before Flint Castle. After relating tJtie cause ot Richard's departure from Conway, and describing the ambush on the journey (see note 1), Holinshed proceeds : [Sol. iii. 6OO/2/71.J King Richard being thus come vnto the castell of Flint, on the mondaie, the eighteenth of August, and the j^nf castie duke of Hereford being still aduertised from houre to houre by im)]^*' posts, [p. 501] how the earle of Northumberland sped, ther morow following being tuesdaie, and the nineteenth of August,* he came thither, & mustered his armie before the kings presence ; which [Boiing- , broke vndoubtedlie made a passing faire shew, being verie well ordered g"^®* by the lord Henrie Persie, that was appointed generall, or rather ^J™*^ (as we male call him) master of the campe, vnder the duke, ■*°s-^®-J of the whole armie. . . . * In a sidenote against this passage Richard is said to have withdrawn to " the castell of Flint," after deserting his army ; and at the close of sc. ii., Act III., he exclaims: " Go to Flint Castle, there He pine away ; . . . That power I haue, discharge," . . . We learn from Creton (ArchMeol. xx. 129-149 ; 349-366), whom Hoi. sub- sequently follows, that Northumberland decoyed Richard from Conway Castle to a part of the road between Conway and Flint, where an ambush was laid. On reaching this spot the Kins was obliged to proceed to Flint, which was in the possession of Northumbenand's troops. Tra/is. (47-52 ; 196-201) has the same story, with less detail. These authorities place the meeting of Richard and Bolingbroke at Flint Castle. Usk (27 ; 138, 139), Ott. (207, 208), and Weds. (ii. 233, 234), agree that Richard left Conway and met Bolingbroke at Flint Castle. But, according to JSves., Richard, forsaking his army, betook himself to Flint Castle (150), whence, after some negotiation, be departed to Conway Castle, where Bolingbroke met him (154, 155). * This date is derived from Eves., 155. 108 V. EICHARD II. ™teS "^^^ ^"*S • • " ^*® walking aloft on the braies i of the wals, to of the!S^m|.) t»ehold the comming of the duke a farre off. I Shakspere altered the time, place, and purpose of Northumberland's mission. That mission had for its object the beguilement of Eichard ' from Conway to Flint, where he would be in Bolingbroke's power. I (begin the following excerpt — ^which contains the outline of III. iii. 31-126 — at the time when Northumberland — entrusted with the difficult task of persuading Richard to leave Conway Castle — [Hoi. iii. 500/2/14.] came before the towne, and then sending an herald to the king, requested a safe conduct from the king, that he might come and talke with him ; which the king granted, and so ifi^thu'^er- the earle of N^orthumberland, passing the water, entred the castell, lamU mat- , , 1 ■§ < 11 ■• 1. 1 ' n * "i i TOffe to the and comming to the king, declared to him, that, it it might please would* ^^ grace to vndertake, that there should be a parlement assembled, ISo^a ^ *^^ which iustice might be had against such as were enimies to i^'^"*' the common-wealth, and had procured the destruction of the duke aMi^ of Glocester, and other noblemen, and herewith pardon the duke pardon, Boiingiroke of Hereford of all things wherin he had offended him, the duke would ^ Ei^hSd's would be readie to come to him on Ms knees,^ to craue of him su^ct.*] forgiuenesse, and, as an humble subiect, to obeie him in all dutifuU seruices. The excerpt illustrating the rest of the scene is an account of what happened at Flint, on a later date. When Bolingbroke approached the castle, he \Hol. iii. 501/1/62.] compassed it round about,- euen^ downe to- tlie sea, with his people ranged in good and seemelie order at the [Again foot of the mounteius : and then the earle of Northumberland,, ascending to ffiotod^'saw P^'Ssing foorth of the castell to the duke, talked with him a while ibr^e^aarmy i^ sight of the king, being againe got vp to the walles, to take theMBtie, better view of the armie, being now aduanced within two bowe ' Creton — Bbl.'s authority for this passage — says that Richard " monta sur les murs dudit chastel [of Flint], g^ui sont grans: & larges par dedens" {Ardiaml. xx. 370). Cp, the stage- direction (1.61): "The trumpets sound, Richard (Mmeareth on the avails." 2 Cp. m. iii. 112,&c.: " His comming hither hath no further scope Theji for his lineall roialties, and to beg: Infranchisement immediate onhis.knees." V. RICHARD II. 109 shootes of the castell, to the small reioising (ye may be sure") of and NoHh- o w ■; / umberland the sorowfull king. The earle of Northumberland, returning to ^"s '"*'' the castell, appointed the king to be set to dinner (for he was fasting till then) and, after he had dined, the duke came downe to the castell himselfe, and entred the same all armed, his rwithinthe ' ' flrst gate of bassenet onelie excepted ; and being within the first gate, he Boitagbroke staled there, till the king came foorth of the inner part of the mc£i castell Tuto him. The king, accompanied with the bishop of Carleill, the earle of Salisburie, and sir Stephan Scroope, knighfc,^-(who bare the sword before him,) and a few other, came foorth into the vtter tTiieyineet ' ' ' in the outer ward, and sate downe in a place prepared for him. Foorthwith, ""^^ as the duke got sight of the king, he shewed a reuerend dutie ^heduke$ o o o> behauwur to as -became him^ in bowing his knee,^ and, comming forward, did J^*™""' so likewise the second and third time, till the king tooke him '"'"'"»• by the hand, and lift him yp, saieng: "Deere cousine, ye are " welcome." The duke, humblie thanking him, said : " My soue- y''« <2«*e» ' o I J demand " reigne lord and king, the cause of my comming at this present, J];^™* ^"3 " is (your honor saued) to haue againe restitution of my person, fands^knd " my lands and heritage, through your fauourable licence." The wM^^t^d king herynto answered : " Deere cousine, I am readie to accom- ^ "plish your will, so that ye may inioy all that is yours, without "exception." Meeting thus togither, they came foorth of the castell, and the king there called for wine, and, after they had dronke, they mounted aiA tuduu on horssebacke, and rode [ — halting at eleyen places on the way — ^1 toguh^r to London : . . . london. 1 Yorkj wliom Shakspere brings into this scene, was not at Flint. He was then, perhaps, at Bristol. — Hoi. 500/i/i2 ; Eves. 153. Before the date of this scene, Amnerle — who is named amongst Richard's friends in III. ii. 27 — went over to Bolingbroke.— Cp. Eol. 6OO/1/57, &c. : Trais. 46; 194: Eves.- 154. Anmerle was present at a meeting between Richard and - Archbishop Arundel, which took place after Richard had been " walking aloft on the IwaieSj" and; before. Bolingbroke drew near and surrounded Flint Castle. When the con- ference was ended, Aumerle returned with Arundel to Bolingbroke.— BToJ. 501/1/8, &c.: Arehaeoi. xx. 157-159; 370, 371. 2 Cp. III. iii. 190, 191 : " Faire coosen, you debase your princdy knee, To make the base earth proud with kissing it : " . . . 110 V, RICHARD II. p — Act II|I p sp. iy.— - This scene — which is wholly of Shakspere's in- vention — has been laid by editors at King's Langley (Herts.), the seat of York, to whom Bolingbroke says (III. i. 36) : " Vncle, you say the \ Queene is at your house." The gardener's words (III. iv. 68-70) show ] that the historic time is shortly before September 30, 1399, the day of I Richard's deposition. Queen Isabelle was then, perhaps, at Wallingford L. Castle, Berks.i Act IV..^c^ .'.i~ " J^nter BuUingbfooke with the Lords to parlia- ment," is the stage direction which heads the Eourth Act. A Parliament, simimoned in Richard's name, met at "Westminster on September 30, 1399, deposed the King, elected Bolingbroke as his successor, and dissolved on the same day. On October 13, Henry IV. was crowned, and, on the following day, a new Parliament, summoned in his name, assembled at Westminster. ^ If we regard Act IV., sc. i., 11. 1-90, from a historical point of view, the latter Parliament was sitting when Bolingbroke enters, and, calling for Sir William Bagot, thus addresses him ; Now, Bagot, freely speake thy mind ; What thou doest know of noble Gloucesters death, Who wrought it with the King, and who performde 4 > The bloudy office of his timeles end. We lost sight of Bagot on the eve of his flight to Ireland (II. ii. 141). Thence he had been brought fettered to London, and im- prisoned.3 On Thursday, October 16, 1399, the Commons " rehearsed all the errors of the last parlement holden in the one and twentith yeare of king Richard [1397-98], & namelie in certeine fiue of them." Of these "errors" the third was that "the duke of Glocester was murthered, and after foreiudged" (Hoi. 5II/2/14). On the same day Bagot was placed at the bar of the House, and a statement,* drawn up by him, was read, from which I quote two clauses illustrating IV. i. 10-19 ; adding thereto the sources of 11. 33-90. [Sol. iii. 512/1/6.] . . . there was no man in the realme to whom king Eichard was so much beholden, as to the duke of 1 On July 12, 1399, the Queen was at Wallingford Castle, Berks. — Bymer, viii. 83. On January 6, 1400, she was at Sonning, Berks.— OM., 225. 2 Uves., 156, 157, 160, 161. Parliament was summoned, in Henry's name, to meet on October 6, but no business was done on that day. — Bot Pari iii. 415/1-2. 2 Usk, 28 ; 140. Fab. (565) says that Bagot was a prisoner in the Tower- at this time. * The excerpts relating to Bagot's charges, and the subsequent appeals, are in MS. Bodl. 2376. f. ccvii. b. & seq., translated in Archaeol. xx. 275, &c. That part of the MS. which contained the charges themselves is missing, but the portion embracing my excerpt beginning with the words " On the satur- daie," is perfect. Comparison of what is left shows that Sol. followed this authority. Fab.'s account (565-567) of the Bagot incident, though varying in details, is substantially the same as Hol.'s. V. RICHARD II. Ill Aumarle : for he was the man that, to fulfill his mind, had set him ^JiS^"^^ in hand -with all that was doone against the said duke, and the betajoon' other lords. . . . There was also conteined in the said bill, that camoestor-s Bagot had heard the duke of Aumarle say, that he had rather than [and of J twentie thousand pounds that the duke of Hereford were dead ; not h*^ for anie feare he had of him, but for the trouble and mischeefe 20,000 pounds that that he was like to procure within the realme. weJ?lS* After that the bill had beene read aad heard, the duke of The duke of Auma/rle hia Aumarle rose vp and said, that as touching the points conteined ^"^^J^f" in the bill concerning him, they were vtterlie false and vntrue ; which he would proue with his bodie, in what manner soeuer it should be thought requisit. . . . On the saturdaie next insuing [Oct. 18], sir William Bagot and ^"f"j^^, the said John Hall ^ were brought both to the barre, and Bagot was *" '** ''""''• examined of certeine points, and sent againe to prison. The lord Fitzwater herewith rose vp, and said to the king, that where the duke of Aumarle excuseth himselfe of the duke of Glocester's Theim-d Fitzwater death, "I say" (quoth he) "that he was the verie cause of his "^^feo/ "death" ; and so he appealed him of treason, offering by throwing jteS'f.ta downe his hood as a gage to proue it with his bodie. There were Gimeestel-s twentie other lords also that threw downe their hoods, as pledges throws down a gage of to proue the like matter against the duke of Aumarle. The duke tattie.] of Aumarle threw downe his hood to trie it against the lord other lorfs did the Fitzwater, as against him that lied falselie, in that he had charged ^^• him with, by that his appeale. These gages were deliiiered to the l^tJ^*"^**^ constable and marshall of England, and the parties put vnder SSilngeby , throwing arrest. down a The duke of Surrie stood vp also against the lord Fitzwater, auouching that where he had said that the appellants were causers of the duke of Glocesters death, it was false, for they were con- gtirrey said * that Fitz- strained to sue the same appeale, in like manner as the said lord ^i^°^^^ Fitzwater was compelled to giue iudgement against the duke of ftoewdo^ Glocester, and the earle of Arundell; so that the suing of the *^*°*-' appeale was doone by constraint, and if he said contrarie he lied : » A former valet of Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk. Hall was, by his own confession, present at the murder of Gloucester. — Bot Pari., iii. 453/i. 112 RICHARD II. [Amnerle threw' down a borrowed gage of battle against Norfolk, who accused him of sending two servants to murder Gloucester.] [Norfolk was licensed to return, that he might arraign his appeale.] and therewith he threw downe his hood. The lord Fitzwater answered herevnto, that he was not present in the parlement house, when iudgement was giuen against them, and all the lords bare witnesse thereof. Moreouer, where it was alledged that the duke of Aumarle should send two of his seruants to Calls, to murther the duke of Glocester, the said duke of Aumarle said, that if the duke of Norfolke aflBrme it, he lied falselie, and that he would proue with his bodie ; throwing downe an other hood which he had borowed. The same was likewise deliuered to the constable and marshall of England,^ and the king licenced the duke of Norfolke to returne, that he might arraigne his appeale. In agreement with the last sentence of these excerpts, Shakspere makes Bolingbroke promise that Norfolk shall be recalled from exile, to answer Aumerle's challenge. Carlisle says that Norfolk is dead (IV. i. 86-102). Norfolk's death is thus noticed by Holinshed : ^ [Hcl. iii. 514/1/73.] This yeare [1399] Thomas Mowbraie, duke of Norffolke, died in exile at Venice ; whose death might haue beene worthilie bewailed of all the realme, if he had not beene consenting to the death of the duke of Glocester. Holinshed does not tell us that Norfolk joined crusades Against black Pagans, Turkes, and Saracens ; but Shakspere may have transferred to Bolingbroke's foe the honour, which Bolingbroke had himself acquired through warfare with ; "miscreants." In 1390 a small corps of Englishmen formed part of an army-^commanded by Lewis Duke of Bourbon, uncle of Charles VI. — which besieged Africa, a fortress seventy miles distant from Tunis. [Poiydore [Sol. iii. i7S/i/6g.] Where, by Polydm' Virgil it may seeme, t^fBoung- that the lord Henrie of Lancaster, earle of Derbie,* should be mandedthe captcinc of the English men, that (as before ye haue heard) went *n'lS-^'*r into Barbaric with the Frenchmen, and Genowais. It should oiAmca.] ' The death of the duke of NorJ^olke. 1 Northumberland was Constable. — Dugdale, i. 2'78/i. The Marshal was Ralph Neville, Earl of Westmoreland. — Dugdale, i. 298/i. 2 Norfolk died on September 22, 1399.-1^2. p. m. 1 H. IV— 71 (O. B.). 3 Polyd: Verg. has the support of St. Denys (i. 652), — written by a contem- porary of Bolingbroke, — which records that a small band of Englishmen went to the siege of Africa "cum comite Delby (sic) anglico. Alio duels Lencastrie." Frois. (xii. 255) — whom Hoi. had previously cited — does not mention Boling- broke's presence, but says that "messire Jean, dit Beaufort, flls bS,tard au duo de Lancastre " was at the siege of Africa iii 1390. V. RICHARD il. 113 otherwise appeare by other writers, who afflrftie that the said earle ■^imuot made a iournie in deed the same time against the miscreants ; not ^M*to into Barbarie, but into Prutzenland, where he shewed good proofe os/aiMt «»« 01 nis noble and vahant courage : pntfem- The appeals of battle having been adjourned (11. 104-106), York enters with the news that Eichard has abdicated. On August 31 0), 1399, the day after his arrival in London, Eichard was conveyed to the Tower,^ where \Hol. iii. 503/1/47.] diuerse of the kings seruants, which by licence had accesse to his person, comforted him (being with sorrow almost consumed, and in manner halfe dead) in the best wise they could, exhorting him to regard his health, andTsaue his life. And first, they aduised him willinglie to sufifer himselfe to be The. ung u deposed, and to resigne his right of his owne accord, so that the ««««« «*« ° ° ' CT'OOTie to the duke of Lancaster might without murther or battell obteine the '*'''*'• scepter and diademe, after which (they well perceiued) he gaped : by meane whereof they thought he might be in perfect assurance of his life long to continue. Whether this their persuasion pro- ceeded by the suborning of the duke of Lancaster and his fauourers, or of a sincere aflFection which they bare to the king, as supposing it most sure in such an extremitie, it is vncerteine ; but yet the effect followed not, howsoeuer their meaning was : notwith- standing, the king,, ifiing now in the hands of his enimies, and vtterlie des^airjngjof^all comfort, was easilie persuaded to renounce his'crowne and ^princelie preEemmencer so that^in^Hope of life onelie^Iie-agreed^_to_all tHngs that were of him demanded. And so (as it should seeme by the copie of an liistrument hereafter following) he renounced and voluntarilie was deposed from his roiall crowne and kinglie dignitie ; the mondaie being the nine and twentith dale of September, and feast of S. Michaell the archangell, [Richard . abdicated on in the yeare of our Lord 1399, and m the three and twentith yeare st.MiohaeVs •' ' •' Day, 1399.] of his reigne. The news, that Eichard has yielded his sceptre to Bolingbroke (U. 107-110), should be compared with the testimony of witnesses present at Jhe abdication, as to what followed the King's reading aloud of the instrument mentioned in the preceding excerpt. » Eves., 155, 156. 114 EICHARD II. [Bicliaid wished to be succeeded by Boling- broke.] tBoling-' broke stood up, and crossed himself.] [Hol. iii. 504/2/39.] Not foorthwith, in our presences and others, he subscribed the same, and after deliuered it vnto the < archbishop of Canturburie, saieng that if it were in his power, or at his assignement, he would that the duke of Lancaster there present should be his successour, and king after him . . .: desiring and requiring the archbishop of Yorke, & the bishop of Hereford, to shew and make report vnto the lords of the parlement of his Toluntarie resignation, and also of his intent and good mind that he bare towards his cousin the duke of Lancaster, to haue him his successour and their king after him.^ ^ When York has announced Richard's abdication, Bolingbroke says (1. 112) : > -^ In Gods name He ascend tlie regcM throne. With reference to these words I quote the following passages, showing how, on September 30, after hearing the sentence of Richard's deposition read, Parliament elected Bolingbroke as his successor. \Hol. iii. 505/2/28.] Immediatlie as the sentence was in this wise passed, and that by reason thereof the realme stood void without head or gouernour for the time, the duke of Lancaster, rising from the place where before he sate, and standing where all those in the house might behold him, in reuerend manner made a signe of the crosse on his forh^ad, and likewise on his brest, and, after silence by an officer commanded, said vnto the people, there being present, these words following. The duke of Lancaster laieth challenge or cla/ime to the crovme. " In the name of the Father, and of the Sonne, & of the Holie- ' Bichard and the commissioneTs appointed to receive his abdication met in the forenoon of September 29, — the abdication took place in the afternoon of the same day, — " where was rehearsed vnto the king by the mouth of the foresaid earle of Northumberland, that, before time at (jonwaie [? Flint] in Northwales, the king being there at his pleasure and libertie, promised vnto the archbishop of Canterburie, then Thomas Arundell, and vnto the said earle of Northumberland, that he, for insufflciencie which he knew himselfe to be of to occupie so great a charge as to goueme the realme of England, he would gladlie leaue of and renounce his right and title, as well of that as of his title to the crowne of France, and his maiestie roiall, vnto Henrie Duke of Here- ford ; and that to doo in such conuenient wise, as by the learned men of this land it should most sufiScientlie be deuised and ordained." — Hoi. 608/2/46 (Hot. Pari, iii. 416/2). V. RICHARD II. 115 "ghost. I Henrie of Lancaster claime the realme of England and " the crowne, with all the appurtenances, as I that am descended by " right line of the blood comming from that good lord king Henrie - "the third ; and through the right that God of his grace hath sent ' "me, with the helpe of my kin, and of my freends, to recouer the "same, which" was in point to be vndoone for default of good "gouernance and due iustice." After these words thus hy him vttered, he returned and sate Ijim downe in the place where before he had sitten. Then the SS^°"* lords hauing heard and well perceiued this claime thus made by SStaiin'of this noble man, ech of them asked of other what they thought **°'''*™^ therein. At length, after a little pausing or stale made, the arch- 2j« *!mam tfie throne.! lined, might be restored to libertie, and haue his former estate & dignitie. It was further appointed, who should assemble the people ; the number and persons which should accomplish and put in execution their deuised enterprise. Hervpon was an indenture ^» «»*»>- ^ ^ fwre sexti- sextipartite made, sealed with their scales, and signed with their 3"»-«*««- hands, in the which each stood bound to other, to do their whole indeuour for the accomplishing of their purposed exploit More- ouer, they sware on the holie euangelists to be true and secret each to other, euen to the houre and point of death. When all things were thus appointed, the earle of Huntington came to the king vnto Windsore, earnestlie requiring him, that he Be is desired to come and would vouchsafe to be at Oxenford on the daie appointed of their »«« «*« »'«"'• iustes; both to behold the same, and to be the discouerer and indifferent iudge (if anie ambiguitie should rise) of their couragious acts and dooings. The king, being [p. 515] thus instantlie required of his brother in law,^ and nothing lesse imagining than that which was pretended, gentlie granted to fulfill his request. Which thing obteined, all the lords of the conspiracie departed home to their [Theconr '^ -^ spirators' houses, as they noised it, to set armorers on worke about the g^^j"*" trimming of their armour against the iusts, and to prepare all other furniture and things readie, as to such an high & solemne 1 " Our trusty brother in law " {Bich. II., V. iii. 137), John Earl of Hunt- ingdon, married Elizabeth, sister german of Bolingbroke. 124 RICHARD II. [They all mot at Oxford, except Butland. (Butland liad the indenture in his bosom.] The dvJce of Twke taketh Vieiltdenture from his son. [York reviled his son, — for whom he had become surety, — and rode off to Windsor, to wamBoling- broke.] [Butland outstripped York.] Th£ ecurle of Rvtland vttreth y whoU con- spiracie to the king, [Aflerwaids came York with the indenture.] triumph apperteined. The earle of Huntington came to his house and raised men on euerie side, and prepared horsse and harnesse for his compassed purpose ; and, when he had all things readie, he departed towards Oxenford, and, at his comming thither, he found all his mates and confederates there, well appointed for their purpose, except the earle of Rutland, by whose follie their practised conspiracie was brought to light and disclosed to king Henrie. For this earle of Eutland, departing before from Westminster to see his father the duke of Yorke, as he sat at dinner, had his counterpane of the indenture of the confederacie in his bosome. The father, espieng it, would needs see what it was ; and, though the Sonne humblie denied to shew it, the father, being more earnest to see it, by force tooke it out of his bosome ; and peroeiuing the contents therof, in a great rage caused his horsses to be sadled out of hand, and spitefuUie reproouing his sonne of treason, for whome he was become suertie and mainpernour for his good abearing in open parlement,^ he incontinentlie mounted on horssebacke to ride towards Windsore to the king, to declare vnto him the malicious intent of his complices. The earle of Butland, seeing in what danger he stood, tooke his horsse,^ and rode another waie to Windsore in post, so that he got thither before his father, and, when he was alighted at the castell gate, he caused the gates to be shut, saieng that he must needs deliuer the keies to the king. When he came before the kings presence, he kneeled downe on his knees, beseeching him of mercie and forgiuenesse, and, declaring the whole matter vnto him in order as euerie thing had passed, obteined pardon. Therewith came his father, and, being let in, deliuered the indenture, which he had taken from his sonne, vnto the king, who thereby perceiuing his sonnes words to be true, changed his purpose for his going to Oxenford. Act V. sec. iv. and v. — Scene iv.. Act V., and the latter part ' (11. » Cp. JtHch. IL, V. ii. 44, 45. 2 Shakspere has made Aumerle take York's horse ; for, according to all the texts of Rich. IL, V. ii. Ill, the Duchess exclaims : " After, Aumeue ! mount the vpon his horse." ' What a groom, who had once served Richard, says about " Roane Bar- barie " (11. 76-80X and the fallen King's comment thereon (11. 84-86), may possibly have been suggested to Shakspere by a story of a greyhound named V. RICHAKD II. 125 95-117) of the next scene, faitMully represent one of the several accounts of Richard's death. [ITol. iii. 517/1/7. J One writer,^ which seemeth to haue great sirPiertde knowledge of king Richards dooings, saith, that king Henri^ m^'mctafd sitting on a daie at his table, sore sighing, said: "Haue I no ^Xwweh " faithful! freend which will deliuer me of him, whose life will be /SoStoote " my death, and whose death will be the preseruation of my life 1" \ This saieng was much noted of them which were present, and-J especiallie of one called sir Piers of Exton. This knight incontin- entlie departed from the court, with eight strong persons in his [Bernei's Froiasart, ed. 1 (1623- 26), vol. ii. fol. cccxii.] Mathe ; though the dog's abandonment of his old master was deliberately cruel, while Barbary was, as Richard admits, "created to be awed by man," and "borne to beare." And, as it was enformed me, kynge Richarde had a grayhounde called Mathe, who alwayes wayted vpon the kynge, and wolde knowe no man els. For, whansouer the kyng dyde ryde, he that kept the grayhounde dyde lette hym lose, and he wolde streight rynne to the kynge and fawne vpon hym, and leape with his fore fete vpon the kynges shulders. And as the kynge & the erle of Derby talked togyder in the courte [of Flint Castle], the grayhounde, who was wont to lepe vpon the kyng, left the kynge & came to the erle of Derby, duke of Lancastre, and made to hym the same frendly couwtiaaunce & chere as he was wonte to do to the kyng. The duke, who knewe nat the grayhounde, demaunded of the kyng what the grayhounde wolde do. " Cosyn," quod the kyng, "it is a gret good token to you, and an yuyll "sygae to me." "Sir, howe knowe you that?" quod the duke. " I knowe it well," quod the kyng : " The grayhounde maketh " you chere this day as k3mge of Englande : (as ye shalbe, and I "shalbe deposed:) the grayhounde hath this knowledge natur- " ally, therfore take hym to you ; he wyll folowe you & forsake "me." The duke vnderstode well those wordes, and cherisshed the grayhounde, who wolde neuer after folowe kyng Richarde, but folowed the duke of Lancastre. Usk says (39, 40 ; 155) that the dog once belonged to Thomas Holland Earl of Kent, on whose deaih it came to Richard, whom it had never before seen. After leaving Richard it went to Shrewsbury, and there Usk saw it fawn upon Henry. » The writer, I suppose, of Trais. (93-96 ; 248-250). Eol. had a MS. of Trais., which he cites as " The French pamphlet " (see p. 82, note 1, above). But Mr. Williams pointed out (Trais,, 1., note 3) that a MS. of Froissart's fourth book (No. 8323 Regius, Biblioth^ue du Roi) has an addition containing the familiar story of Richard's murder by Exton, the writer of which addition says that he was informed of its truth "par homme digne de foy, nomm6 Creton " (li.). The only important difference between Hd.'s version, and the original story as narrated by Creton and the writer of Trais. is that, according to the latter authorities, Bolingbroke expresshr ordered Exton to slay Richard : the aside which gave Exton his cue (" Haue I no . . . of my life ") first occur- ring, I believe, in Halle (20), whose account of Richard's murder agrees in other particulars with what Hbl. relates. [Richard had a greyhound called Mathe, who would follow no one else.] [At Flint Castle, Mathe left Bichard, and fawned on Boling- broke.] [This was an omen that Bolinehroka should he King of England.] [Mathe would never after follow Richard.] 126 V. RICHARD II. [Exton went to Fom&et vith eight followers ; and ordei«d tbe sewer not to taste Bichanl's rood.] [When the sewer refused to taste the food, Bichaid. struck him, and bade the devil take him and Boling- broke. Then the murderers entered.] The degpernt •mavhood of fcing Bichard. K. RicJiard murthnrecL [Exton's remorse.] companie, and came to Pomfret, commanding the esquier, that was accustomed to sew^ and take the assaie before king Richard, to doo so no more, saieng: "Let him eat now, for he shall not long eat." King Richard sat downe to dinner, and was serued without courtesie or assaie ; wherevpon, much maruelling at the sudden change, he demanded of the esquier whie he did not his dutie : "Sir" (said he) "I am otherwise commanded by sir Piers of "Exton, which is newlie come from K. Henrie." When king Richard heard that word, he tooke the keruing knife in his hand, and strake the esquier on the head, saieng: "The diuell take " Henrie of Lancaster and thee togither ! " And with that word, sir Piers entred the chamber, well armed, with eight tall men likewise armed, euerie of them hauing a bill in his hand. King Richard, perceiuing this, put the table from him, &, steping to the formost man, wrung the bill out of his hands, & so valiantlie defended himselfe, that he slue foure of those that thus came to assaile him. Sir Piers, being half dismaied herewith, lept into the chaire where king Richard was woont to sit, while the other foure persons fought with him, and chased him about the chamber. And in conclusion, as king Richard trauersed his ground, from one side of the chamber to an other, & comming by the chaire, where sir Piers stood, he was felled with a stroke of a pollax which sir Piers gaue him vpon the head, and therewith rid him out of life ; ^ without giuing him respit once to call to God for mercie of his passed oflFenses. It is said, that sir Piers of Exton, after he had thus slaine him, wept right bitterlie, as one striken with the pricke of a giltie conscience, for murthering him, whome he had so long time obeied as king. sc. VI. — This- scene.,^ postdsiigd, for the revolt was sup- pressed before Kichard's death, l^en sc. vi. opens, " the latest newes " which Bolingbroke has heard is that the rebels have burnt ' " sew . . . assaie " = serve and remove the dishes, and taste the food in them. 2 February 14, 1400, is the usually accepted date of Richard's death (see Eves., 169) ; but, on January 29, 1400, Charles VI. referred to him as Richard late King of England, whom God pardon. — Bymer, viii. 124. Wylie (i. 114, 115) cites documentary evidence from which he infers that Richard was murdered about the middle of January, 1400. V. KICHAED II. 127 Cirencester; but whether they had been "tane or alaine" was un- known. As Holinshed's account of the rebellion was not dramatized, an epitome of the chief facts recorded by contemporary chroniclers will suffice. The rebel lords marched to Windsor, hoping to sur- prise Henry. Warned in time, he fled by night (Jan. 4-5) to Loudon, and raised forces to oppose them. The rebels retreated, and arrived at Cirencester on January 6. At midnight, the townsmen attacked them in their lodgings, and, after a struggle which lasted for many hours, obliged them to surrender. The lords were then confined in the abbey. About vespers a chaplain attached to them set fire to some houses in Cirencester, in order that the prisoners might escape while the townsmen were extinguishing the flames. But the men of Cirencester, paying no heed to the fire, brought the rebels out of the abbey, and beheaded the Earls of Salisbury and Kent about sunset, on January 7, liOO.— Usk, 40, 41; 156. Trdison, 80-82; 233-235. Ann. R. II.— H. 17., 323-326. Holinshed's narration of what befell the other conspirators should be compared with 11. 7-29. [Hoi. iii. 5I6/2/16.] The lord * Hugh Spenser,^ otherwise called • Thoma _ _^_ Spenser earle of Glocester, as he would haue fled into Wales, was taken ««»'* "'«'• <'' ' ' others. and carried to Bristow, where (according to the earnest desires of the commons) he was beheaded. . . , Manie other that were jSpenser '' beheaded.] priuie to this conspiracie, were taken, and put to death, some at naii. Oxford, as sir Thomas Blunt, sir Beuet Cilie, knight, . . . but sir ^^Ufjj^'^ Leonard Brokas, and [others] . . . , were drawne, hanged, and Broras,and beheaded at London. There were nineteene in all executed in xh^^^' one place and other, and the heads of the cheefe conspirators were S'""' set on polles oner London bridge, to the terror of others. Shortlie conspSi^' after, the abbat of Westminster, in whose house the conspiracie set on' , . London was begun, (as is said.) goomg betweene his monasterie & mansion. Bridge.] ° '^ >/ & o 1 » The abbat of for thought fell into a sudden palsie, and shortlie after, without westmimter speech, ended his life.^ The bishop of Carleill was impeached, and »»*««'«• condemned of the same conspiracie ; but the king, of his merciful! ' Qq. I, 2, 3, 4, read : " The heades of Oxford, Salisbury, Blunt and Kent" (V. vi. 8). Fi has : "The heads of Salsbury, Spencer, Blunt, and Kent." As Aubrey de Vers, Earl of Oxford, had no share in the rebellion, the reading o^f Fi should be preferred. 2 William Colchester, Abbot of Westminster, was a prisoner in the Castle of Reigate on January 25, 1400.— OJous ; 1 H. IV. pars i. m. 19 (0. B.). He must have soon regained his freedom. — Arm. B. II. — H. IV., 330 ; and CZous, 1 H. IV. pars ii. m. 6 (0. B.). He was probably the William Abbot of West- minster present at Pisa in 1408. — Marline's Thesav/rus Novvs Anecdotorum, ii. 1395 C. According to Dugdale (Monasticon, ed. 1817-30, i 275, 276) Colchester was Abbot of Westminster until some date in October, 1420. 128 V. RICHARD II. after, ^ more through feare than force of sicknesse, as some haue Tt',^}^ "{ clemencie, pardoned him of that offense ; although he died shortlie through fearet or t^,K written. greefe of "h^' 'id" '^^^ excerpt quoted above (pp. 125, 126) contains all that Holinshed protperashfi^s recorded touching Exton. From the subjoined description of ' Richard's funeral, it appears that Bolingbroke paid as much respect to tooke it. Hall. the late King's memory as may warrant the closing lines of this scene. [Sol. iii. 517/1/49.] After he was thus dead, his bodie was imbalmed, and seered, and couered with lead, all saue the face, to the intent that all men might see him, and perceiue that he was departed this life : for as the corps was conueied from Pomfret to London, in all the townes and places where those that had the conueiance of it did stale with it all night, they caused dirige to be soong in the euening, and masse of Bequiem in the morning ; and as well after the one seruice as the other, his face discouered, was shewed to all that coueted to behold it. Thus was the corps first brought to the Tower, and after through the citie, to the cathedrall church of saint Paule, bare faced ; where it laie three daies togither, that all men might behold it. There was a solemne obsequie doone for him, both at Paules, and after at Westminster, at which time, both at dirige ouernight, Westminster and in the morning at the masse of Bequiem, the king and the Pauls.] citizens of London were present. When the same was ended, the corps was commanded to be had vnto Langlie, there to be buried in the church of the friers preachers. The following excerpts bear upon the characters of Richard II., Edmund Duke of York, and Sir John Bushy. In summing up the general aspect of society in Richard's time, Holinshed says, with regard to the King : HUperion- [Hoi. iii. 507/2/68.] He was seemelie of shape and fauor, & of ""'■ ' nature good inough, if the wickednesse & naughtie demeanor of such as were about him had not altered it. His chance verelie was greatlie infortunate, which fell into such calamitie, that he tooke it for the best waie he could deuise to renounce his kingdome, for the which mortall men are accustomed [Richard's body con- veyed from Pomfret to London.] TliecUad bodie of K, Aicfia/rd brought to y Tovjtr. [Funeral rites at * He lived several years after this time. See Wylie (i. 109, 110) for an account of Carlisle's fortunes subsequent to the rebellion. V. RICHAED II. 129 to hazard [39. 508] all they haue to aAteiae thetevuto. But such mis- fortune (or the like) oftentimes falleth vnto those princes, which, when they are aloft, cast no doubt for perils that male follow, [He was Tx procUga.1, He was prodigall, ambitious, and much giuen to the pleasure 'mii>^ioo3. of the bodie. . . • i"*®i [Rol. iiL 5O8/1/32.] Furthermore, there reigned abundantUe [He was an adulterer,] the filthie sinne of leacherie and fornication, with abhominable adulterie, speciallie in the king.^ York, sfiys H0UApl>$d, [ffol. iii. 464/2/49. J being verelie a man of a gentle n&bare, i|»fkj» wished that the state of the common-wealth might haue beene "»*""•] redressed without losse of any mans life, or other cwell dealing. He [Sol. iii 485/2/25. J was a man rather coueting to liue in [York was pleasure, than to deale with much businesse, and the weightie a™wtipuB.j aflFaires of the realme.^ When John of Gaunt married Katharine Swinford, the Duke of Gloucester, /^'[IIol. iii. 486/ 1/20. J being a man of an high mind and stout [Gloucester ^bmach, misliked his brothers matcliing so meanlie, but the duke toierltek of Yorke bare it well inough. Satoh!? The Speaker of the " Great Parliament " (Septemher, 1397) was ^ [Hoi. iii. 490/2/28.] sir lohn Bushie, a knight of JJineolneshire, ^^{^" Taccompted to be an exceeding cruell man, ambitious, and couetous ^«"*«''- (beyond measure. While discharging the oflSce of Speaker at this Parliament, 1 Bolindbroke ohargea Bushy and Greene with tempting Bichard to commit this sin (in. i. 11-15). 2 Wfwiyng thus describes Mm (340, 341) : . . . Edmonde hyght of Langley of good chere, Glad and mery and of his owne ay lyued, Without itrionge, as ehronicles hane l>reii^(J, When all the lordes to councell and parlyatnent Went, he wolde to hunte and also to hawefcyng, All gentyll disporte as to a lorde appent; He vsed aye, and to the pore ^upportyng Where euer he was in any place bidyng, Without suppryse, or any extoroyon Of the porayle, or any oppiesayon. K 130 VI. FIRST PART OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH. ^ - -[Hoi. iii. 49O/2/S7.] Sir lohn Bushie, in all his talke, when he / proponed any matter vnto the king, did not attribute to him titles \ of honour, due and accustomed ; but inuented vnused termes, and such strange names as were rather agreeable to the diuine Impudent \ maicstie of God, than to any earthlie potentate. The prince, Busto'uk d ! "^^^S desirous inough of all honour, and more ambitious than was by Bichard] /requisite, seemed to like well of his speech, and gaue good eare to his talke. Richard was very unfortunate in his choice of favourites, for [ffol. iii. 492/2/72.] such as were cheefe of his councell were i^ns°hSd esteemed of the commons to be the woorst creatures that might NorfoSfand ^® > ^^ \.P- ^93] the dukcs of Aumarle, Norfolke, and Excester, the te'th^Ji^irat earle of Wiltshire, sir lohn Bushie, sir William Bagot, and sir greatly iiated Hcurie ^ Grceue : which three last remembred were knights of the GreeneTc ■^^*^» ^gaiust whom the commons vndoubtedlie bare great and JlV-m)]"- P™ie hatred. VI. FIEST PAET OF KING HENKY THE FOUETH. Act I. sc. i. — A more precise date than the year 1402 ^ cannot be assigned to the opening scene in The Historie of Henry the /oti/rth ; * because, though but "yesternight" (1. 36) a post had brought tidings of Sir Edmund Mortimer's capture by Glendower, on June 22, 1402,* Sir Walter Blunt has since arrived with news of the Scots' defeat at Homildon (11. 67-73) ; which happened on September 14, 1402.^ The last historic event of the play is the battle of Shrewsbury ; fought on July 21, 1403.6 Of Mortimer's capture Holinshed gives the following account : {Rol. iii. 520/1/64.] Owen Glendouer, according to his accus- tomed manner, robbing and spoiling within the English borders, caused all the forces of the shire of Hereford to assefnble togither against them, vnder the conduct of Edmund Mortimer, earle of 1 Hen/rie'] Thomas Hoi. ^ For an excerpt relating to the proposed crusade, of which Henry speaks in this scene (U. 18-29), see p. 159 below. 3 I quote the text of Ql (1598). * Usk, 75 I 200. s Ott, 233. « U$k, 80 ; 206. VI. FIRST PART OP KING HENRY THE FOURTH. 131 March. ^ But, cowimiag to trie the matter by battell, whether by Theearuof •' ' >i March [Sir treason or otherwise, so it fortuned, that the English power was gJ^^^L discomfited, the earle taken prisoner, and aboue a thousand of his '^Znm- m people slaine in the place. The shamefuU villanie ^ vsed by the o»m *" Welshwomen towards the dead carcasses, was such as honest [t^^^u. eares would be ashamed to heare, and continent toongs to speake ^"ny.f thereof. The dead bodies might not be buried, without great summes of monie giuen for libertie to conueie them awaie. A Scottish army having been defeated on June 22, 1402,^ while returning from a border foray, \Hol. iii. 520/2/40.] Archembald, earle Dowglas, sore displeased in his mind for this ouerthrow, procured a commission to inuade England, and that to his cost, as ye may likewise read iu the Scotish histories. For, at a place called Homildon, they were so bcou van- quUhM at nercelie assailed by the Englishmen, vnder the leading of the lord Bomndon. Persie, surnamed Henrie Hotspur,* and George earle of March,^ that with violence of the English shot they were quite vanquished and 1 In 1402, Edmund Mortimer, fifth Earl of March, being a minor, was Henry's ward. — Usk, 21 ; 127. Glendower's prisoner was Sir Edmund Mor- timer, brother to Roger Mortimer, fourth Earl of March (see p. 134, note 4, below), and uncle to the fifth Earl. HoVs mistake misled Shakspere (1 Hen. IV., I. iii. 8^. On December 13, 1402, Sir Edmund Mortimer wrote to his tenants, informing them that he had joined in a quarrel raised by Owen Glendower, " of which the object is, if King Richard be alive, to restore him to his Crown, and if not, that my honoured nephew, who is the right heir to the said Crown, shall be King of JEngland (la quelle est tielle, qe si le Roy Richard soit en vie de luy restorer a sa coronne, et sinoun qe mon honore Neuewe q'est droit heir al dit coronne seroit Roy d'Engleterre)."— ^Hts, II. i. 24. 2 I shall imitate Shakspere's reticence (I. i. 43-46) in regard to the Welsh- women's " villanie." Bol. (528/1/36-48) gives full details. 3 Hd. bWj'ZJ'ii^. They were defeated at Nisbet, Roxburghshire. " Nesbit- more in Marchia." — FordAm, ii. 433. Hoi. does not mention the date of Mortimer's capture, which, as the reader will perceive, coincides with the overthrow of the Scots in the summer of 1402. If it were possible that Shak- spere could have known the former date, we might conjecture tliat he rolled into one the defeats at Nisbet and Homildon, in order that the post bringing tidings of Glendower's victory should reach London about the same time as Sir Walter Blunt arrived with the consoling news of Scottish disaster. * The Earl of Northumberland had two sons, " the one named Henrie, and the other Rafe ; verie forward and lustie gentlemen. This Henrie, being the elder, was surnamed, for his often pricking, Henrie Hotspur, as one that seldome times rested, if there were anie seruice to be doone abroad." — Hoi. H. 8. 249/1/30. According to Dugdale (i. 278/3) Northumberland had three sons, named Henry, Thomas, and Ralph. 6 Shakspere's " Lord Mortimer of Scotland" (1 Hen. IV., III. ii. 164). See p. 142 below. 132 VI. FIRST PART OF KING HE^iTRY THE FOURTH. The number slaine. PrUonei'8 tah&n. ■/ Avch^mbaXd Doieglas iv-uadeth England, The nobles of Scotland in this armie. Henrie Hotspur and the earle of March assaile the Scots at Homildon, put to flight, on the Rood daie in haruest, with a great slaughter made by the Englishmen. . . . There were slaine . . . three and twentie knights, besides ten thousand of the commons ; and of prisoners among other wef e these : Mordacke earle of Fife, son to the gouernour, Archembald earle Dowglas,^ (which in the fight lost one of his eies,) Thomas erle of Murrey, George ^ earle of Ang-us, and (as some writers haue) the earles of AthoU & Menteith ; * with fine hundred other of meaner degrees. I supplement my last excerpt by quoting from Holinahed's Historie of Sootlcmd another account of the battle of Homildon. [Hoi. ii. H. S. 254/1/57.] Archembald, earle of Dowglaese, sore displeased, and woonderfulUe wroth in his mind for this ouerthrow [at Msbet], got commission to inuade England with an armie of ten thousand men ; and, hauingthe same once readie with all things necessarie for his voiage, he set forward, and entering into England, burnt and harried the countrie, mat staieng till he came as farre as Newcastell. In this armie thers'was with the Dowglasse, Murdocke (eldest Sonne to duke Robert Jearle of Fife, Thomas erle of Murrey, George earle of Angus ; with manie other lords and nobles of Scotland. At the last, when they were returning homewards with a preie of infinit goods and riches, Henrie Hotspur, and George earle of March, with a great power of men, met them, and assailed 1 In the origmal text of Hoi. (ed. 2) thia sentence stands thus : " Mordacke earle of Fife, son to the gouernour Archembald earle Dowglas " ; and in the 1st ed. of Hoi. also the words " gouernour Arohembalde " are unpunctnated. The corresponding lines (70-72) of 1 Hen. IV. (ed. 1), I. i. are : " .... of prisoners. Hotspur tooke Mordake [the] Earle of Fue, and eldest sonne To beaten Ponglas ; " . . . and subsequent editions have the same reading. Steevens believed (Far, Sh. xvi. 187) that the omission of a comma after " gouernour " misled Shakspere ; because the "gouernour," or Regent, of Scotland was Robert Steward, Duke of Albany, whose eldest son was " Mordacke earle of Fife." But, as in the play Murtlach Steward is called " ddest sonne," it would seem that Shakspere must have known one or both of the excerpts relating to the battle of Uomildon, which I quote from Holinahed's Histot'ie of Scotland. 2 George] Bobert Hoi. ' Hol.'s slip has misled Shakspere (op. I. i. 73). " Menteith " was another title of Murdoch Steward, who, in Hoi. (ii. H. S. 259/2/65, is called " Mordo Steward earle of Fife and Menteith " ; a description confirmed by Hoi. ii. H. 8. 262/2/54, and H. S. 419/1/32. VI. FIRST PART OP KING HENRY THE FOURTH. 133 them so with such incessant shot of arrowes, that where the earle tuscou, of Dowglas with his armie had the aduantage of an hill, called Mo^pthe Homildon, he was constreined to forsake the same ; and, comming '^\^"'^ downe vpon the Englishmen, was neuerthelesse put to the woorsse, the most part of his people being either taken or slaine. . . . Archembald earle of Dowglas, Murdocke Steward, eldest sonne pnsomn to duke Eobert the gouernour, George erle of Angus, ... with the most part of all the barons of Fife and Louthian ,,,„,, Bueh. 1401. were taken prisoners. This battell was fought on the Rood "H^^^X" day in haruest, in the yeere 1403 [1402], vpon a Tuesday. — " Act I. sc. iii.— This scene and 11. 91-99, so. i. Act I, are illustrated by my next excerpts. [Sol. iii. 621/1/1. 1.] Henrie, earle of Northumberland, with [Northum- his brother Thomas, earle of Worcester, and his sonne the lord Hottpur™ Henne Persie, surnamed Hotspur, which were to king Henrie, in S^Seaii the beginning of his reigne, both faithfully frgends^ and earnest Stisn - aiders, began now to enuie his wealth and felicitie ; and especiallie wereoSmed they were greeued, bicause the king demanded of the earle and to'^wiiom't'ife i_. 1 n • 1 . Earl of Fife Bis Sonne such Scotish prisoners as were taken at Homeldon and heetf*^ Nesbityfor, of all the captiues which were taken in the conflicts '*«"^^^«i-l foughten in those two places, there was deliuered to the kings possession onelie Mordake earle of Fife, the duke of Albanies Sonne ; though the king did diners and sundrie times require deliuerance of the residue, and that with great threatnings : wherewith the Persies being sore offended, (for that they claimed them as their owne proper prisoners, and their peculiar preies^)^ the counsell of the lord Thomas Persie, earle of Worcester, whose [Worcester a studie was euer (as some write) to procure malice, and set things "'*''''•'*'«•] in a broile, came to the king ynto Windsore, (vpon a purpose to prooue him,) and there required of him, that either by ransome or ^"^ «?«<«« .0/ the Persies otherwise, he would cause to be deliuered out of prison Edmund ^*]jj^°''"'y Mortimer earle of March, their cousine germane,^ whom (as they SoSer]. ^ Henry IV. and Hotspur were cousins, Henry's grandfethep, Henry Planta- genet Duke of Lancaster, being brother german to Mary, Hotspur's grandmother. Perhaps Halle (Hol.'s authority) alluded to the common descent of the two Percies, and Edmund fifth Earl of March, from Henry III. 134 VI. FIEST PART OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH. reported) Owen Glendouer kept in filthie prison, shakled with irons ; onelie for that he tooke his part, and was to him faithful! and true. (Henij^ The king began not a little to muse at this request, and not request]'' without cause : for in deed it touched him somewhat neere, sith this Edmund was sonne to Roger earle of March, sonne to the ladie Philip, daughter of Lionell duke of Clarence, th(3 third sonne Ereh hid ^ of king Edward the third ; which Edmund, at king Richards going Si?dheir- ^^^ Ireland, was proclamed heire apparant to the crowne and mS*]''^ realme ; ^ whose aunt, called Elianor,^ the lord Henrie Persie had married ; and therefore king Henrie could not well beare,* that anie man should be earnest about the aduancement of that linage. Ls^^ed The king, when he had studied on the matter, made answer, that would not the earle of March was not taken prisoner for his cause, nor in his Tansom Morto^r, seruice, but willinglie suffered himselfe to be taken, bicause he would ^j^Ji^ not withstand the attempts of Owen Glendouer, and his complices ; ^^teke^] & therefore he would neither ransome him, nor releeue him.* The Persies with this answer and fraudulent excuse were not a Thttaimgof little fumcd, iusomuch that Henrie Hotspur said openlie : "Behold, the L. Perne. ' e r > " the heire of the relme is robbed of his right, and yet the robber "with his owne will not redeeme him!"* So in this furie the 1 Hoi. has, I believe, copied a mistake of Halle (27). On August 6, 1385, Parliament recognized Edmund's father— Roger fourth Earl of March — as heir-presumptive to the crown. — Eidog., iii. 361. 2 Elizabeth. — Rymer, viiL 334. She was the sister of Sir Edmund Mortimer, and the wife of Hotspur. — Miilog., iii. 396. ^ beare] hea/re Hoi. edd. 1, 2. * In the last article of their " quareU " the Percies, addressing Henry IV., said that " Edmundus Mortymere, frater Rogeri Mortymere nuper comitis Marchie et Ultonie, fuit captus per Owinum Glendore in mortal! bello cam- pestri, et in prisona ac vinculis ferreis adhuc crudeliter tentus, in causa tua, quem tu proclamasti captum ex dolo, et noluisti pati deliberacionem suam per Be nee per nos consanguineos suos et amicos." — Hardyng, 353. Cp. p. 131, n. 1, above, where a letter is quoted in which Edmund Mortimer speaks of his nephew. As to Roger, fourth Earl of March, and father of Edmund, fifth Earl, see p. 89, n. 1, above. Halle's version of this article (30) has " Edmond Mortimer earle of Marche and Ulster," to represent " Edmundus Mortymere, frater Rogeri Mortymere nuper comitis . . . Ultonie." * We learn from Eulog. (iii. 395, 396) that, in 1403, Hotspur desired Henry IV. to ransom Sir Edmund Mortimer. An altercation ensued, and the King drew his dagger. " ' Non hie,' dixit Henricus [Percy], ' sed in campo.' Et recessit." This open quarrel can hardly be assigned to an earlier date than June, for on June 26, 1403, Northumberland wrote a friendly letter to Henry. — Proc. Priv. Co. i. 204. Vr. FIRST PART OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH. 135 Persies departed, minding nothing more than to depose king Henrie from the high type of his roialtie, and to place in his seat their cousine Edmund earle of March, whom they did not onelie deliuer '^ «?>' out of captiuitie, but also (to the high displeasure of kine Henrie") **« ^'^'^ entered m league with the foresaid Owen Glendouer. . . , Qu^nixyvM. King Henrie, not knowing of [«. 6221 this new confederacie i^™''' ™» w i-.t J > unaware of and nothmg lesse minding than that which after happened, ^oto*""™ gathered a great armie to go againe into Wales ; whereof the earle of Northumberland and his sonne were aduertised by the earle of Worcester, and with all diligence raised all the power they could tu pema. make, and sent to the Scots, which before were taken prisoners at !«"««•«• Homeldon, for aid of men : promising to the earle of Dowglas the They eraue towne of Berwike, and a part of Northumberland, and, to other Scotish lords, great lordships and seigniories, if they obteined the vpper hand. The Scots, in hope of gaine, and desirous to be reuenged of their old greefes, came to the earle with a great companie well appointed. The Persies, to make their part seeme good, deuised certeine ^*« "^«*- a > bwliap of articles, by the aduise of Eichard Scroope, archbishop of Yorke, co^al^un, brother to the lord Scroope, whome king Henrie had caused to be S^S" beheaded at Bristow. The Chronicles contain this notice of the marriage of Sir Edmund Mortimer ; whom Shakspere, misled by Holinshed, makes Henry call " that Earle of March " (I. iii. 84) : [Eol. iii. 52I/1/21.] Edmund Mortimer, earle of March, prisoner with Owen Glendouer, whether for irkesomnesse of cruell captiuitie, or feare of death, or for what other cause, it is vncerteine, ^^'^ "•'' agreed to take part with Owen against the king of England ; and S^S-'o/- tooke to wife the daughter of the said Owen.^ eSower. Believing that Glendower's prisoner was Edmund Earl of March^ Holinshed thus comments upon Henry's unwillingness to ransom a dangerous rival (Cp. 1 ffen. IV., I. iii. 158, 159) : [Hol. iii. 520/2/5.] The king was not hastie to purchase the 1 " Eodem anno [1402] Dominus EdmunduB Mortimer, . . . circa festuro S. Andreae Apostoli [Nov. 30], flliam prsedicti Owyni Glyndore desponsavit maxima cum solemnitate, & (sicut vulgariter dioitur) conversus est totaliter ad Wallicos."— .B«es., 182. 136 VI. FIRST PART OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH, The sm- deliuerance of the earle March, bicause his title to the crowne was picum of ^ ' ^oSd ^®^ inough kndwen, and therefore suffered him to remaine in '^^cSa!* miserable prison j wishing both the said earle, and all other of his linage, out of this life, with God and his saincts in heaueo, so they had beeue out of the waie, for then all had beene well inough as he thought. Act II. 8c. iii. — The Lord, whose temporizing letter roused Hot- Bpur's scorn (II. iii. 1-38), was, no doubt, one of the " noblemen " or " states of the reahne " to whom the Percies' articles were submitted. \Hol. iii, 522/1/19.] These articles being shewed to diuerse Tiunn. Wall, noblemeo, and other states of the realnae, mooued them to fauour their purpose, in so much that manie of them did not onelie promise to the Persies aid and succour by words, but also by their writings and seales^ confirmed the same. Howbeit, when the [The percios matter Came to triall, the most part of the confederates abandoned were aban- doned by them, and at the daie of the conflict left them alone. Thus, after nobles who ' ' aid thl^]*° *^** *^^ conspirators had discouered themselues, the lord Henrie Persie, desirous to proceed in the enterprise, vpon trust to be assisted by Owen Glendouer, the earle of March [i. e. Sir Edmund Mortimer], & other, assembled an armie of men of armes and archers foorth of Cheshire and Wales. Act II. sc, iv. — The Prince of Wales- was at a tavern in Easbcheap when FalstafE — ^reporting to him the news of the rebellion, brought by / a nobleman of the Court — says : " Worcester is stolne away to night '* ^ (1. 392). We learn from Holinshed that, as soon as Hotspur had made the first move, by assembling " an armie of men of armes and arehers," ^Z^f [Bol. iii. 522/1/32.] his vncle Thomas Persie, earle of m^^l, " Worcester, that had the gouemement of the prince of Wales, Mm. who as then laie at London, in secret manner conueied ^ himselfe Sail. , * Hardyng tells us (351, prose addition ; 361) that he saw the sealed letters by which these noblemen bound themselves to join the Percies' revolt. The Lord, whose letter is read in II. iii., was "well contented to bee" at the gathering-place, "in respect of the loue " he bore the Percies' house, but what followed was a tacit refusal of help. " "the prince . . . manner conueied." I have altered the punctuation here by placing a comma after " London," and removing a comma which stood after " 'manner. "^ Hol.'s punctuation — which is the same in both editions of his ChroBicles— rmight lead one to infer that the Prince had come to town to enjoy himself clandestinely, and Shakspere perhaps so understood the sentence. Comparison with Ott. (240) shows that the words " in secret manner " apply to Worcester. VI. FIRST PART OP KING HENRY THE FOURTH. 137 out of the princes house ; and comming to Stafford (where he met his nephue) they increased their power by all waies and meanes they could deuise. Act III. sc. i. — The first scene of Act III. is laid at the Archdeacon of Bangor's house, where Hotspur, Mortimer, and Glendower have met to partition between them King Henry's realm. Before going to business, Hotspur and Glendower talk of certahiportents attending the lattei^s nativity (U. 13-40). I do not find in Holinshed any birth recorded which was marked by such signs, but it is possible that a horrible prodigy associated with Mortimer's entrance into the world set Shakspere's imagination working to devise marvels suited to the fairer fortunes of lie Welsh prince, [Hoi. iii. 521/1/27.] Strange wonders happened (as men reported) at the natiuitie of this man, for, the same night he was borne, all his fathers horsses in the stable were found to stand in ff'S^'^J* Mortimers blond vp to the bellies.^ "^^^^ Malone conjectured that Shakspere transferred to the time of Glendower's birth a portent recorded in the ensuing excerpt : 1402 [Hoi. iii. 519/2/59.] In the moneth of March [1402] appeared a biasing starre, first betweene the east part of the firmament and , ^, . the north, flashing foorth fire and flames round about it, and, '^^^g"^' lastlie, shooting foorth fierie beams towards the north j foreshewing mi^md" (as was thought) the great eflusion of blond that fojlowed, about teriand™ the parts of Wales and Northumberland./ Por much about the same time, Owen Glendouer (with his Welshmen) fought with the lord Greie of Ruthen, comming foorth to defend his possessions, which the same Owen wasted and destroied ; and, as the fortune of that dales worke fell out, the lord Greie was taken prisoner, Tfte lord and manie of his men were slaine. This hap lifted the Welshmen ^™« "f ■*- Ruthen into high pride, and increased meruelouslie their wicked and ^ui^om presumptuous attempts. eundou^. » Accordiug to Ev^. (179), Ch/rm. CHies (Bin. IV. 11), and Mvlog. (398), Mortimer's birth was thus signalized. But, as in Eol., the paragraph immedi- ately preceding — which records Mortimer's marriage, and is quoted by me at p. 135 above — ends with the words "the said Owen,'' "this man" might be understood to mean Glendower. VFals. (ii. 253, 254) — from whom Hoi. derived both paragraphs — meant, perhaps, that Glendower was the man at whose nativity horses "were found to stand in blond vp to the bellies." 138 VI. FIRST PART OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH. Glendower claims to have thrice sent Henry "weather beaten backe " to England (III. i. 64-67). The first of these luckless expedi- tions was made in 1400 (see an account of it at p. 104 above). Henry's second failure was ascribed to the " art magike," in which Glendower professes to be so deeply skilled (III. i. 46-49). Holinshed says : [Hoi. iii. 520/2/19.] About mid of August [1402]/ the king, to chastise the presumptuous attempts of the Welshmen, went with a great power of men into Wales, to pursue the capteine of the Welsh rebels,^ Owen Glendouer; but in effect he lost his labor, for Owen coueied himselfe out of the waie into his knowen lurking places, and (as was thought) through art magike, he caused such intemperat foulc wcather of wiuds, tcmpest, raine, snow, and haile to be [caused by raiscd, for the annoiance of the kings armie, that the like had not Glendower's ■, 1 o • iii. --i sorcery]. bccne heard of : m such sort, that the kmg was constremed to returne home, hauing caused his people yet to spoile and burne first a great part of the countrie. The third expedition has been antedated. It was undertaken in 1405,^ after the suppression of Archbishop Scrope's revolt, when Henry TheK. \Hol. iii. 530/2/70.1 tooke his iournie directlie into Wales, patiethinto '- i ii J waiet. where he found fortune nothing fauourable vnto him, for all his seioosethUs attempts had euill successe ; in somuch that, losing fiftie of his cartages. a ' o Heretumeth. cariagcs through abundance of rame and waters, he returned. Waiving further discussion of supernatural matters, Glendower draws Hotspur's attention to a map, upon which Mortimer points out the intended partition of England and Wales between the confederates (11. 70-77). According to Holinshed, Northumberland, Hotspur, and Glendower, [Hoi. iii. 621/2/57.] by their deputies, in the house of the archdeacon of Bangor, diuided the realme amongst them ; causing dtniHin a tripartite indenture to be made and sealed with their seales, by tripartite. ^^^ coucnauts whcreof, all England from Seuerne and Trent, south A diuisum 0/ and eastward, was assigned to the earle of March : all Wales, & that which ' " they had not. ^jjg lands beyoud Seuerne westward, were appointed to Owen 1 Wals. ii. 250. Usk, 76 ; 201. Ott. 235. 2 rebels] Hoi. ed. 1. rebdl Hoi. ed. 2. 3 Wals. n. 271. VI. FIRST PAET OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH. 139 Glendouer : and all the remnant from Trent northward, to the lord Persie.^ Hotspur scoffs at a prophecy (11. 149-155) which seems to have had ^ much weight ; for Holinshed, speaking of the partition described in my last excerpt, says : \E.ol. iii. 621/2/67.] This was doone (as some haue said) through a foolish credit giuen to a vaine prophesie,^ as though king a. vatm Henrie was the moldwarpe, curssed of Gods owne mouth, and they ^ three were the dragon, the lion, and the woolfe, which should diuide this realme betweene them. Act III. so. ii. — In this scene Prince Henry is reproached by his father for devotion to ignoble pleasures and base associates. The Prince answers (11. 18-28) : So please your Maiestie, I would I could Quit all offences with as clear excuse. As well as (I am doubtlesse) I can purge 20 My selfe of many I am chargd withall : Yet such extenuation let me beg, As, in reproofe of many tales deuisde (Which oft the eare of greatnes needs must heare) 24 By smiling picktha/nks, and base newesmongers, I may, for some things true, wherein my youth Hath faulty wandred and irregular, Find pardon on my true submission. 28 1 This alliance was made after Hotspur's death. On February 28, 1405, " Henricus, comes Northumbriae, fecit legiam et confoederationem et amioitiam cum Owino Glendore, et Edmundo de Mortuomari, filio quondam Edmundi comitis Marchiae [the third Earl], in certis articulis continentibus formam quae sequitnr et tenorem." — Gwon. Giles {Hen. IV. 39). In the following pages of Chron. GUes (40, 41) the tripartite division of England and Wales is set forth. * This prophecy is in MSS. Bodl. 1787 (printed in Archaeol., xx. 258). The " talpa ore Dei maledicta " was to suflfer for her past misdeeds ; and " terra rever- tetur ad asinum [Richard II.], vel aprum, vel draconem, vel leonem." Hotspur was angered by hearing from Glendower "... of the Moldwa/rp and the Ant, Of the dreamer Merlm and his prophecies, . . . And of a Dragon . . . A couching Lion, &e.'' Halle says (28) : " a certayne writer writeth that this earle of Marche, the Lorde Percy and Owen Glendor wer vnwysely made beleue by a, Welsh Pro- phecier, that king Henry was the Moldwarpe, ... by the deuiacion and not deuinaciora of that mawmet Merlyn." A clause in the indenture between Northumberland, Mortimer and Glendower runs thus : " Item, si disponente Deo, appareat praefatis dominis ex processu temporis, quod ipsi sint eaedem personae, de quibus propheta loquitur, inter quos regimen Britanniae majoris divididebeatetpaTtiri,:tuncipsi laborabunt, et quilibet ipsorum laborabit juxta posse, quod id ad eflfectum efficaciter perducatur,"— OArow. Giles {Hen. IV., 40). 140 VI, FIRST PART OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH. The Prince's reference to the slanders of certain " pickthanks," who accused him of a more serious transgression than that of keeping loose company, seems to anticipate a misunderstanding which arose between the father and son towards the end of Henry IV.'s reign. In 1412, the ofwS'' {Sol. iii. 539/1/ 1. J lord Heiirie, prince of Wales, eldest Sonne to^tfJ?. *° ^"'S Henrie, got knowledge that certeine of his fathers seruants were busie to giue informations against him, whereby discord lohnsum. might arise betwixt him and his father: for they put into the kings head, not onelie what euiU rule (according to the course of youth) the prince kept to the offense of manie, but also what great resort of people came to his house ; so that the court was nothing furnished with such a traine as dailie followed the prince. The «M- These tales brought no small suspicion into the kings head, least picious ^ , 11. geumsie of his souue would presumc to vsurpe the crowne, he being yet aliue ; toward /.is through wMch suspicious gelousie, it was perceiued that he 8on. fauoured not his sonne, as in times past he had doone. The Prince (sore offended with such persons as, by slanderous reports, sought not onelie to spot his good name abrode in the realme, but to sowe discord also betwixt him and his father) wrote his letters into euerie part of the realme, to reprooue all such slanderous deuises of those that sought his discredit. And to cleare himselfe the better, (that the world might vnderstand what wrong he had to be slandered in such wise,) about the feast of Tiupnwe Peter and Paule, to wit, the nine and twentith daie of June, he goeth to the court with a came to the court with such a number of noble men and other his great traine. freends that wished him well, as the like traine had beene sildome scene repairing to the court at any one time in those dales. At Westminster Prince Henry made his peace with the King, by whom "he was dismissed with great loue and siglies of fatherlie affection." • I give the passage following these words, because it contains the epithet " pickthanks," which occurs in the lines quoted above ; and also elucidates the Prince's avowal that " some things " were " true," wherein his youth had " faulty wandred." ["Pick- \E6h iii. 539/2/28.1 Thus were the father and the sonne thanks" ■■ . di^lfon reconciled, betwixt whom the said picMhcmks had sowne diuision, Knl''and*''° iusomuch that the sonne, vpon a vehement conceit of vnkindnesse H^Sy] sproong in the father, was in the waie to be worne out of fauour. VI. FIRST PART OP KING HENRY THE FOURTH. 141 Which was the more likelie to come to passe, by their informations that priuilie charged him with riot ^ and other vnciuill demeanor [Prince , „ Henry's vaseemelie for a prince. Indeed he was youthfuUie giuen, growne tehavionr.i to audacitie, and had chosen him companions agreeable to his age ; o/^V- "" with whome he spent the time in such recreations,^ exercises, and ^^°^ , '■ ' ' against delights as he fansied. But yet (it should seeme by the report of diSn'in some writers) that his behauiour was not offensiue or at least *'"^'' tending to the damage of anie bodie ; sith he had a care to auoid dooing of wrong, and to tedder his aflFections within the tract of Tertue ; whereby he opened vnto himselfe a redie passage of good liking among the prudent sort, and was beloued of such as could discerne his disposition, which was in no degree so excessiue, as that he deserued in such vehement maner to be suspected. Continuing to rebuke his son, the King says (11. 32, 33) : Thy place in counsell thou hast rudely lost, Which by thy yonger brother is supplide. Holinshed briefly mentions the well-known story ^ that Prince Henry once struck Chief -Justice Gascoign ; and adds : {Hoi. iii. 543/2/17.] The king after expelled him out of his [ciarence priuie councell, banisht him the court, and made the duke of S'fc^^o?/ Clarence (his yoonger brother) president of counceU in his steed. Mnaf "' Henry. * I find nothing to warrant this charge, but it is said that Eastcheap — the Shaksperian Prince Hal's old haunt^^waa once disturbed by a riot in connexion with which Prince John — Falstaff's "yong sober blouded boy" (2 Hen. IV., IV. iii. 94) — is mentioned. Under 1410, Stow writes (550) : " Vpon the eenen of Saint lohn Baptist [June 33], Thomas and John, the kings sonnes, being in East-cheap at London, at supper, after midnight, a great debate hapned betweene their men, and men of the court, lasting an honre, till the Maior and Sheriflfes with other Citizens ceased the same." The riot is thus chronicled by Ch'eg. (106) : "And the same tyme [1410] was the hurlynge in Estechepe by the lorde Thomas and the lorde John, the kyngys sone, &c." 2 One of these "recreations" is thus described by Stow (557) : 'He [Prince Henry] liued somewhat insolently, insomuch that, whilest his father liued, ^ y^ being accompanied with some of his yong Lords and gentlemen, he would waite in disguised aray for his owne receiuers, and distresse them of their money ; and sometimes at such enterprises both he and his company were surely beaten ; and when his receiuers made to him their complaints how they were robbed in their comming vnto him, hee would giAie them discharge of so much money as they had lost ; and, besides that, tliey should not depart from him withmit great rewg/rdsfor their trouble and vexation ; especially they should be rewarded that best had resisted him and his company, and of whom he had reeeiued the greatest and most strokes.' With the words italicized cp. what Prince Henry says in regard to the booty taken from the travellers on Gadshill : " The money shall bee paid backe againe with aduantage " (1 Sen. IV., XL iv. 599). ? See p. 161, below. 142 VI. FIRST PART OP KING HENRY THE FOURTH. / Shakspere has used a dramatist's freedom in making Henry IV. speak of Hotspur as "being no more in debt to yeares" than the Prince (1. 103). Whether Shakspere was ignorant of, or chose to disregard, the chronological aspect of this matter, I know not, but from a comparison of two passages in his authority {Hoi. ii. H. S. 249/ 2/7, &c., and iii. 5II/2/9, &c.) he could have learnt that in 1388 Harry Percy was old enough to command the English forces at Otterburne, while in 1399 Harry Monmouth was only twelve years of age. Indeed it is probable that Hotspur was older than the King. Henry IV. was born on April 3, 1367 (Gmnpotus Hugonia de Waterton, cited in Notes & Queries, 4th S. xi. 162) ; and Walsingham tells us (i. 388) that, on November 25, 1378, Hotspur displayed his pennon for the first time (" primo . . . suum vexillum displicuit ") at the siege of Berwick Castle. When the Prince has succeeded in gaining his father's confidence, and has been promised a command in the royal army. Sir Walter Blunt enters and announces that news of the rebels' gathering at Shrewsbury has been sent by " Lord Mortimer of Scotland " (1. 164). In the following excerpt George of Dunbar, Earl of the March of / Scotland,! jg galled " the Scot, the earle of March " ; an appellation / which might have led Shakspere to believe that the Scottish Earls of March were akin to the English Mortimers, Earls of March. [^Hol. iii. 522/2/39.] King Henrie, aduertised of the proceedings of the Persies, foorthwith gathered about him such power as he might make, and, being earnestlie called vpon by the Scot, the earle of March, to make hast and giue battell to his enimies, before their power by delaieng of time should still too much increase, he The ung» passcd forward with such speed, that he was in sight of his enimies, duigmce. lieng iu campc neere to Shrewesburie, before they were in doubt of anie such thing ; for the Persies thought that he would haue staled at Burton vpon Trent, till his councell had come thither to him to giue their aduise what he were best to doo. But herein the enimie was deceiued of his expectation, sith the king had great regard of expedition and making speed for the safetie of his owne person ; wherevnto the earle of March incited him, considering that in delaie is danger, & losse in lingering. Act IV. sc. i. — A messenger brings Hotspur news that Northum- berland " is grieuous sicke " (1. 16), and delivers a letter containing the Earl's excuses for not coming himself or sending the expected rein- forcements. After speaking of the efforts made by Hotspur and Worcester to increase their strength (p. 137 above), Holinshed says;^ » He is called " George de Dnnbarre, Erie of the Marche of Scotland," in the indenture (dated July 25, 1400) by which he engages to transfer his allegi- ance from Robert III. to Henry IV.—Bymer, viii. 153. VI. FIRST PART OP KING HENRY THE FOURTH. 143 [Hoi. iii. 522/1/39.] The earle of Northumberland himselfe was [North- ^ not with them, but, being sicke, had promised vpon his amende- pre^nted ment to repaire vnto them (as some write) with all conuenient Hoto w^iSd speed. Worcester.] Act rV". sc. ii. — ^If, in Shakspere's day, there were some captains J who "misused the kinges presse damnablie " (1. 13), contemporaries of Sir John FalstafE had also enriched themselves by a like practice. In 1387, Richard Earl of Arundel, — to whom the command of an English fleet had been given, — [Hoi. iii. 454/1 /S 3.] vnderstanding that the duke of Glocester, and manie other noblemen would see the muster of his men, vsed all diligence, and spared for no costs, to haue the most choisest and pikedst fellowes that might be gotten ; not following the euill example of others in times past, which receiued tag and rag to fill vp their numbers, whom they hired for small wages, and reserued a great _ . , abuse in the residue to their pursses. o*""* »/ *■ louliiurt. Act IV. sc. iii. — Shakspere assigned to Sir Thomas Blunt the w mission ^1. 41-51) which, as my next excerpt shows, was entrusted to the Abbot of Shrewsbury and a clerk of the Privy Seal. [Hoi. iii. 523/1/35.] The next daie in the morning earlie, being the euen of Marie Magdalene [July 21, 1403], they set their battels in order on both sides, and now, whilest the warriors looked when the token of battell should be giuen, the abbat of Shrewes- burie, and one of the clearks of the priuie scale, were sent from The ung offereth to the king vnto the Persies, to offer them pardon, if they would Pfdmhu come to any reasonable agreement. By their persuasions, the lord Henrie Persic began to giue care vnto the kings ofiers, & so sent with them his vncle the earle of Worcester, to declare vnto the king the causes of those troubles, and to require some efiectuall reformation in the same. Act V. sc. i. — ^Holinshed's epitome of the Percies' charges is inter- woven with the speeches of Hotspur (IV. iii. 60-62 ; 90-96) and Worcester (V. i. 41-58). I have transposed the order of the passages . in Holinshed concerning the Abbot of Shrewsbury's mission, and the j/ delivery of the Percies' articles to Henry. " The next daie " — when, ^ as appearsfrom the preceding excerpt, the Abbot offered Henry's terms to the rebels — was the day after that on which Hotspur's esquires were sent to the royal camp with these articles, [Hoi. iii. 623/1/8.] Now when the two armies were incamped, 144 VI. FIRST PART OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH. ThePerHea the One against the other, the earle of Worcester and the lord sent their _ ° th^uV P^''sie with their complices sent the articles (whereof I spake before), by Thomas Caiton, and Roger ^ Saluain, esquiers, to king King Bmrie Henric, vndcr their hands and scales ; which articles in eiFect charged with ' ' iieriMTO. charged him with manifest periurie, in that (contrarie to his oth receiued vpon the euangolists at Doncaster, when he first entred the realme after his exile) he had taken vpon him the crowne and roiall dignitie, imprisoned king Richard, caused him to resigne his title, and finallie to be murthered, Diuerse other matters they laid to his charge, as leuieng of taxes and tallages, contrarie to his promise, infringing of lawes & customes of the realme, and suffering the earle of March to remaine in prison, without tranelling to haue Frocurors i: him dcliucred.^ All which things they, asprocurors & protectors of protectors of ' muT™" ^^^ common-wealth, toote vpon them to prooue against him, as they protested vnto the whole world. King Henrie, after he had read their articles, with the defiance The Hngs which they annexed to the same, answered the esquiers, that be messmgers was Tcadic with dlut of sword and fierce battell to prooue their that brought the articles. quarrcU false, and nothing else than a forged matter ; not doubting, but that God would aid and assist him in his righteous cause, against the disloiall and false forsworne traitors. Act V. sc. ii. — On tlje day of battle (July 21), Hotspur, after hearing Henry's proposals, sent back their bearer, the Abbot of Shrewsbury, accompanied by Worcester, to the King (see p. 143 above). Holinshed left Worcester's treachery unexplained, but Shakspere has supplied a motive for it (11. 4-23), [Hoi. iii. 523/1/48.] It was reported for a truth, that now 1 Boger] Thomas Hoi. 2 All these charges are made in Hotspur's or Worcester's speech. (They are contaiaed in the Percies' " quarell," cited at p. 134, n. 4, above.) Hotspur says that Henry "taskt the whole state" (IV. iii. 92), and reformed "certaine edicts " and " streight decrees " (IV. iii. 79) ; words which embody the accusa- tions of having levied " taxes and tallages,'' and infringed " lawes and customes of the realme.'' Worcester's complaint that they were in danger of their lives from Henry's jealousy (V. i. 59-64)— cp. what Hotspur says (IV. iii. 98) — occurs in some letters which, besides the articles, were sent abroad by the Percies, wherein they affirmed that " where through the slanderous reports of their enimies, the king had taken a ^eeuous displeasure with them, they durst not appeare personalUe in the kings presence, vntill the prelats and barona of the realme had obteined of the king licence for them to come and purge themselues before him, by lawfuU triall of their peeres, whose iudgement (as they pretended) they would in no wise refuse.^' — Sol. iii. 522/1/52. VI. FIRST PART OF KING HENRY THE FOURTH. 145 when the king had condescended vnto all that was resonable at his hands to be required, and seemed to humble himselfe more than was meet for his estate, the earle of Worcester (vpon his ThemrUof Worcatert returne to his nephue) made relation cleane contrarie to that the *«*^ ^^ king had said, in such sort that he set his nephues hart more in ™™%„^ tiu displeasure towards the king,~lhan euer it was before ; driuing him **""' """'^" by that meanes to fight whether he would or not. The armies are on the point of joining battle when Hotspur thus encourages his followers (V. ii. 82-89) : Gentlemen, the time of life is short ! To spend that shortness basely were too long, If life did ride vpon a dials point, 84 Still ending at the arriual of an houre. And if we liue, we liue to tread on kings. If die, braue death, when princes die with vs ! Now, for our consciences, the armes are faire, 88 When the intent of bearing them is iust. The ensuing excerpt contains a speech attributed to Hotspur, which has less martial ardour than is displayed in these lines. Henry's rapid advance obliged the rebels to desist \Hol. iii. 522/2/60.] from assaulting the towne of Shrewesburie, trrinee The princc, his Sonne, being hereof aduertised, entered into the iaketh atuaie Wmhu^ chamber, tooke awaie the crowne, and departed. The father, being fM^r was suddenlie reuiued out of that trance, quicklie perceiued the lacke of his crowne ; and, hauing knowledge that the prince his sonne He is uarned had taken it awaie, caused him to come before his presence, requiring of him what he meant so to misuse himselfe. The His answer, prfnce, With a good audacitie, answered: "Sir, to mine and all "mens iudgements you seemed dead in this world ; wherefore I, as "your next heire apparant, tooke that as mine owne, and not as Agmitit "yours." "Well, faire sonne" (said the king with a great sigh), SS? "'^ " ^^^* "S^* ^ ^^^ *° ^*' ^^^ knoweth." " Well " (said the prince), iBTMftefft « jf yo^ ^jg ^jjg^ J ^iii haxLG the garland, and trust to keepe it "with the sword against all mine enimies, as you haue doone." 1 Recorded by Fah. (.576) under the 13th year of Henry IV. Clarence speaks of a threefold tide which occnrred " a little time before" Edward III.'s death, and Gloucester is alarmed by " vnfather'd heires, and lothly births of nature" (IV. iv. 121-128), lately observed. I find no records of these latter portents. There may be an allusion to the wet summer of 1594 — cp. Mids. N. D., II. i. 82-114— in Gloucester's remark that "the seasons change their manners," &c. (11. 123, 124). ^ Mons. (ii. 435), who was, I suppose, Halle's authority for the following story, says that, " comme il est accoutum^ de faire au pays," the crown was placed "sur une couche assez prfes de lui" [Henry]. VII. THE SECOND PART OF KING HENRY IV. 159 Then said the king, " I commit all to God, and remember you to "doo well." With that he turned himselfe in his bed, and shortlie vu death of Ilenrie the after departed to God in a chamber of the abbats of Westminster /■»"■«*■ called lerusalem, the twentith daie of March, in the yeare 1413, and in the yeare of his age 46 : when he had reigned thirteene yeares, fiue moneths, and od dales, in great perplexitie and little pleasure. . . . The King's "very latest counsaile" (1. 183) to Prince Henry is illustrated by two passages from Holinshed. Advising engagement in " f orraine quarrells " as an expedient for occupying the " giddie mindes " of unfaithful subjects, Henry says (11. 210-213) that he had a purpose now To leade out manie to the Holy Land, Lest rest and lying stil might make them looke 212 Too neare vnto my state. Holinshed thus describes the warlike preparations which were made — as Fabyan asserts^ — with the design of reconquering Jerusalem : [ffol. iii. 540/2/60.] In this fourteenth and last yeare of king FaHan. Henries reigne, a councell was holden in the white friers in London ; u, ha^J^oe -, 11" 1 r n 1 • 1** iournie at the which, among other things, order was taken for ships and agamst the gallies to be builded and made readie, and all other things neces- sarie to be prouided for a voiage which he meant to make into the holie land, there to recouer the citie of lerusalem from the Infidels. . . . [Sol. iii. 541/1/5.] The morrow after Candlemas daie began a uis parlement, which he had called at London, but he departed this ^pariemmt. life before the same parlement was ended : for now that his pro- uisions were readie, and that he was furnished with sufficient treasure, soldiers, capteins, tittels, munitions, tall ships, strong gallies, and all things necessarie for such a roiall iournie as he 1 These preparations have perhaps been postdated, and their object (an expedition against France) misunderstood. On April 18, 1412, a patent {Bymer, viii. 730) was issued to press sailors "ad Deserviendum nobis in quodam Viagio snpra Mare infra breve faciendo " ; and on July 12, 1412, Henry acknowledges the loan of a thousand marks from the Archbishop of Canterbury, for the expenses which " Nos, pro communi Oommodo, circa Proseoutionem & Adeptionem Juris nostri (Deo dante) in partibus Aquitannisfe, ac alibi, in partibus Transmarinis, infra breve facere oportebit."— jRj/mer, viii. 760. In August, 1412, the Duke of Clarfence was sent with a strong force ("manu valida") to the assistance of the Armagnae faction.— IFok., ii. 288. On August 10 he landed at la Hogue-Saint- Vast.— OAron. NorrnaMe, 418. 160 VII. THE SECOND PART OF KING HENRY IV. The K. tick of an apopUxie. Ball. Fabian. [Henry swooned while pray- ing at the slu'ine of Edwanl the Confessor.] [A prophecy that Henry should depart this life in Jeru- salem.] pretended to take into the holie land, he was eftsoones taken with a sore sicknesse, which was not a leprosie, striken by the hand of God (saith maister Sail) as foolish friers imagined ; but a verie apoplexie, of the which he languished till his appointed houre, and had none other greefe nor maladie. As the scene ends Henry recognizes the fulfilment of a prophecy that he " should not die but in Jerusalem " (1. 238). Holinshed relates how this prediction was accomplished : [Hoi. iii. 541/1/63.] We find, that he was taken with his last sickenesse, while he was making his praiers at saint Edwards shrine, there as it were to take his leaue, and so to proceed foorth on his iournie : he was so suddenlie and greeuouslie taken, that such as were about him, feared lest he would haue died presentlie ; wherfore to releeue him (if it were possible) they bare him into a chamber that was next at hand, belonging to the abbat of West- minster, where they laid him on a pallet before the fire, and vsed all remedies to reuiue him. At length, he recouered his speech, and, vnderstanding and perceiuing himselfe in a strange place which he knew not, he willed to know if the chamber had anie particular name ; wherevnto answer was made, that it was called lerusalem. Then said the king : "Lauds be giuen to the father of "heauen, for now I know that I shall die heere in this chamber; "according to the prophesie of me declared, that I should depart "this life in lerusalem." ^ 1 Fab. (576) says that, by a council beld at White Friars on November 20, 1412, it was "concluded, that for the kynges great lournaye that he entendyd to take, in vysytynge of the holy Sepulcre of our Lord, certayne Galeys of warre shuld he made, & other purueaunce concemynge the same lournay." Fah then tells the story — which I quote from Hoi. — of Henry's death in the Jeru- salem Chamber. There can hardly be a doubt, however, that Henry accom- plished a pilgrimage to Jerusalem before he ascended the throne. On November 18, 1392, the Venetian Senate granted the request of " Lord Henry of Lancaster, Earl of Derby, Hereford, and Northampton, . . . the eldest son of the Duke of Aquitaine " [John of Gaunt], that he might have " the hull of a galley, with all necessary tackle, to visit the holy places." — Ven. State PP., i. 33/107. On November 30, 1392, the Senate decreed the expenditure of a sum of public money to honour the Earl of Derby, the eldest son of the Duke of Lancaster, " the intimate friend of our Signory, on this his coming to Venice, bound for the Holy Sepulchre."— Jtid., 33/io8. And on March 31, 1393, the Grand Council ordained that one hundred golden ducats of public money should be expended to " honour the Earl of Derby, son of the Duke of Lancaster, on this his return." — Ibid., Ziji 10. VII. THE SECOND PART OF KING HENRY IV. 161 Act V. sc. ii. — ^The new King hears a vindicatory speech of the Lord Ohief-Juetice (II. 73-101), by whom, in time past, he had been com- mitted to prison for a gross act of lawlessness. I have mentioned above (p. 141) an insult offered by Prince Henry to the Chief- Justice, and 1 here quote the account which Holinshed gives of this matter. After his coronation Henry V. is said to have dismissed his unworthy associates, [Sol. iii. 543/2/10.] and in their places he chose men of ^^en grauitie, wit, and high policie, by whose wise counsell he might tSnehi'"' at aU times rule to his honour and dignitie ; calling to mind how ooSeu^™. once, to hie oflFense of the king his father, he had with his fist [Onoe, when striken ^ the cheefe iustice for sending one of his minions (vpon Princes ho struck tliQ desert) to prison : when the iustice stoutlie commanded himselfe J^®?-^ also streict to ward, & he (then prince) obeied. In his answer to the Chief-Justice the King repeats Henry IV. 's words (11. 108-112) : Happie am I that haue a man so bold. That dares do iustice on my proper sonne ; And no lesse happie, hauing such a sonne, That would deliuer vp his greatnesse so. Into the hands of Iustice ! The story of Prince Henry's rudeness to the Chief-Justice made its earliest known appearance in Sir Thomas Blyot's Gow&mowr, 1531 ^ (ff. 122-123 verso). Stow copied Elyot (557, 558). I quote Tha Gotiemour because it contains the remark attributed to Henry IV., which Holinshed omitted. ^ The following passage in Redman (11) is the earliest known authority for the blow given by Prince Henry to the Chief- Justice, and the consequent supersession of the Prince in the Couneil by the Duke of Clarence : " Senatu movebatur, nee in curiam aditus ei patebat ; et illitis faiaa hsBsit ad metas, quod summum judicem, litibus dirimendis et causarnm oognitionibus prae- positum, manu percuteret, cum is unum in cnstodiam tradidisset ex cnjus familiaritate voluptatem mirifloam Henricus perciperet. Bam dignitatem, quam is amisit, Thomas illitis frater, Dux Clarensis, est consecutus." Mr. Cole proves that Redman's Vita Sen. V. was " composed between 1536 . . . and 1544." — Ibid., pp. ix., x. 8 Sir N. H. Nicolas pointed out {Haeitorvm AbbrewaUo, pp. 256, 257) a likely source for this fiction ; and in an exhaustive pa]^8T entitled " The Story of Prince Henry of Monmouth and Chief-Justice Qaseoigii," Mr. F. Solly-Flood has given details from which it appears that, on account of a judgment delivered towards the close of Edward I.'s reign, in the case of Roger de Hengham versus William de Brews, the Chief-Justice of the King's Benui was reviled in open court by the defendant. The record (Rot. coram Bege, m. 33, 34 Ed. I., m. 75) of the Court's judgmait against De Brews for his mis- behaviour contains the following passage : "Quse quidem, videlicet eontemptus et inobedientia [cp. the words-"" contempt and disobedience " — attributed by Elyot to the Ohiel-Justice] tam ministris ipsius Domini Regis quam sibi ipsi aut curiae suae facta valde sunt odiosa et hoc nuper apparuit cum idem Dominus Kex filinm suum primogenitum et carissimum Edwardum Principem Walliae M 162 VII. THE SECOND PART OP KING HENRY IV. [One of Prince Henr5''s servants was arraigned at tlie King's Bench for felony.] [The Prince came to the bar and demanded the release of his servant.] [The Chief- Justice admonished the Prince to let the law take its course, or obtain a pardon from the King.] [The Prince endeavoured to take away his servant, [and, being commanded to desist, [went up to the Chief- Justice in a menacing manner.] (But the Chief- Justice, without blenching, asserted his authority as the King's represent- ative. The moste renomed prince kinge Henry the fifte, late kynge of Englande, durynge the life of his father was noted to be fierce [fol. 122 veTso\ and of wanton courage: it hapned that one of his seruawtes, whom he well fauored, for felony by hym committed was arrayned at the Kynges benche, wherof he being aduertised, and incensed by light persones aboute hym, in furious rage came hastily to the barre, where his seruant stode as a prisoner, and commaunded hym to be vngyued and sette at libertie ; where at all men were abasshed, reserued the chiefe iustice, who humbly exhorted the prince to be contented that his seruaunt mought be ordred accordyng to the auncient lawes of this realme, or, if he wolde haue hym saued from the rigour of the lawes, that he shuld optaine, if he moughte, of the kynge his father his gracious pardon, wherby no lawe or iustice shulde be derogate. With whiche answere the prince nothynge appeased, but rather more inflamed, endeuored hym selfe to take away his seruaunt. The iuge (consideringe the perilous example and incowuenience that moughte therby ensue) with a valiant spirite and courage com- maunded the prince, vpon his alegeance, to leue the prisoner and departe his way. With whiche commandemewt the prince being set all in a fury, all chafed & in a terrible maner, came vp to the place of [fol. 123] iugemewt ; (men thinkyng that he wolde haue slayne the iuge or haue done to hym some damage ;) but the iuge, sittyng styll without mouynge, declarynge the maiestie of the kynges place of iugement, and with an assured and bolde countenance, hadde to the prince these wordes folowyng : " Sir, remembre your selfe : I kepe here the place of the king pro eo quod qusedam verba grossa et acerba cuidam ministrp bud dixerat et hospicio sue fere per dimidium annum amovit nee ipsum filium suum in con- spectu sue venire permisit quousque predioto ministro de prediota transgres- sione satisfeceiat." — Solly-Mood, 106. Here we have evidence ol verbal abuse bestowed on a royal ofScer by the iirst Prince of Wales, whose punishment resembles that which, according to Redman, Prince Henry suflfered for striking the Chief-Justice. (Cp. " nee in curiam aditus ei patebat," p. 161, note 1, above.) Mr. Solly-Flood informs us that the Rotuli coram Rege and the Oon- trolment rolls embrace every commitment by the King's Bench either ad respondendmn, or m penam. He carefully examined all the entries made during the reign of Henry IV. on these rolls, — which are perfect throughout this reign, — and found no record of Prince Henna's commitment for any offence, or of the commitment of any one during Henry IV. 's reign for the .offences attributed to the Prince by Elyot and Redman. — Sotty-Flood, 102. Vir. THE SECOND PART OP KING HENRY IV. 163 "your Boneraigne lorde and father,^ to whom ye owe double " obedience ; wherfore eftsones in his name I charge you desiste " of your wilfiilnes and vnlaufuU entreprise, & from hewsforth gyue "good example to those whiche hereafter shall be your propre [and bade "subiects. And nowe for your contempt and disobedience go you ^Jij^nolt^a "to the prisone of the kynges benche, where vnto I committe you ; finch.] " and remayne ye there prisoner vntill the pleasiu"e of the kyng " your father be further knowew." With whiche wordes beinge abasshed, and also wondrynge at [,^^®g'j!°*'® the meruailous grauitie of that worshipful lustice, the noble prince, ^rvaS"^ layinge his waipon aparte, doinge reuerewce, departed, and wente ?nmiiant, to the kynges benche as he was commaunded, Wherat his wtoie* seruawtes, disdainyng, came and shewed to the kynge all the hole before t^ aflFaire. Whereat he a whiles studienge, after, as a man all ^^^J^^ rauisshed with [fol. 123 verso] gladnesse, holdyng his eien and *** handes vp towarde heuen, abrayded, sayinge with a loude voice : £^?e a^dee "0 mercifuU god, how moche am I, aboue all other men, miSstered "bounde to your infinite goodnes! specially for that ye haue iMSyfaMa "gyuen me a luge who feareth nat to ministre iustice, and also obeyed justice.] " a Sonne who can suflFre semblably and obey iustice ! " Before leaving the stage Henry says (1. 134 ; 141, 142) : Now call we our high court of parliament : . . , Our coronation done, we wil accite (As I before remembred) all our state. Holinshed briefly notices the first Parliament of Henry V. [Sol. iii. 543/2/44.] Immediatlie after Easter he called a ^^^^"^ parlement, in which diuerse good statutes, and wholesome ordin- 1 I then did vse the person of your father ; The image of his power lay then in me : . . . Your Highnesse meased to forget my place, The maiestie and power of law and iustice, The image of the King whom I presented, And strooke me in my very seate of iudgement ; . . . 80 The writer of Uie Famovs Victories of Henry the fifth, 1598, made the Judge — to whom Prince Henry had given " a boxe on the eare " — say (so. iv. 11. 99-102, f. 14) : "in striking me in this place, you greatly abuse me, and not me onely, ut also your father : whose liuely person here in this place 1 doo represent." This assertion has — accidentally, no doubt — the same scope as the doctrine laid down by the Court of King's Bench in regard to William de Brews's contempt: " Et quia sicut honor et reverentia qui ministris ipsius Domini Regis ratione of&cii sui [fiunt] ipsi Regi attribuimtur, sic dedeeus et contemptus ministrlB suis facta eidem Begi attribuuntur." — SoUy-Mood, 106, Henry V.]. 164 Til. THE SECOND PART OP KING HENRY IV. ances, for the preseruation and aduancement of the common- wealth were deuised and established. Act V. so. V. — ^Falstaff interrupts the royal procession on its return after Hetlry's coronation, and is sent by the King into banishment ■with Henry's other " misleaders " ; all of whom have been forbidden to come within " ten rnile " of ' our person ' ; though they are to receive pensions now for " competence of life," and " aduancement " in future, if they reform themselves (11. 67-74). Holinshed thus records Henry's coronation and altered behaviour : The day of [Hol. Hi. 543/i/54.] He was crowned the ninth of Aprill, king Benriel j . -r, • i-i-i • i, , coronation Dcmg Jf assion sundaie, which was a sore, ruggie, and tempestuous o very ^ ^ tempeituoua day, with wiud, snow, and sleet; that men greatlie maruelled thereat, making diuerse interpretations what the same might signifie. But this king euen at first appointing with himselfe, to shew that in his person priucelie honors should change publike manners, he determined to put on him the shape of a new man. txal^'tf ^or whereas aforetime he had made himselfe a companion vnto ^^'*'° misrulie mates of dissolute order and life, he now banished them he tecame all from his prcsencc (but not vnrewarded, or else vnpreferred) ; King, banished Ms inhibiting them vpon a great paine, not once to approch, lodge, or mates]. soioumc withiu ten miles, of his court or presence : . . . The foUowiag sketch of Henry IV. 's character and circumstances may have afforded Shakspere some hints. His stature. [Hol. iii. 541/2/20.] This king was of a meane stature, well proportioned, and formallie compact ; quicke and liuelie, and of a chi^aoter.] stout courage. In his latter dales he shewed himselfe so gentle, that he gat more loue amongst the nobles and people of this realme, than he had purchased malice and euill will in the beginning. But yet to speake a truth, by his proceedings, after he had atteined to the crowne, what with such taxes, tallages, subsidies, and exactions as he was constreined to charge the people with ; and what by punishing such as, mooued with disdeine to see him vsurpe the crowne (contrarie to the oth taken at his entring into this land, vpon his returne from exile), did at sundrie times rebell against him ; he wan himselfe more hatred, than in all his life time (if it had beene longer by manie yeares than it was) had beene possible for him to haue weeded out & remooued. VIII. HENRY y, 165^- VIII. HENKY V. Hbnky V. appears to have received the Dauphin Lewis's^ gift of tennis-balls in Lent, 1414.^ This date marks the commencement of historic time in The Life qf Emmy the Fift ; and the play ends with Katharine of Valois's betrpthal in May, 1420. Act I. Prologue. — for a Muse of Fire, that would ascend The brightest Heauen of Inuentibn, A Ejngdome for a Stage, Princes to Act, And Monarchs to behold the sweUing Scene I 4 Then should the Warlike Harry, like himselfe. Assume the Port of Mars ; and at his heeles (Leasht in, like Hounds) should Famine, Sword, and Fire Crouch for employment. 8 A speech ^ attributed to the " "Warlike Harry " contains a parable which may have suggested the picture of these crouching hounds of Famine, Sword, and Fire. On Jantmry 2, 1419, E.ouen, despairing of succour, after five months' siege,* yielded to the pressure of famine so far as to open communication with Henry through ambassadors. Aim- \Hol. iii. 667/1/39.] One of them, scene in the cijiill lawes, was appointed to declare the message in all their names ; who, shewing himselfe more rash than wise, more aFrog^^t than learned, ™^™'" first tooke vpon him to shew wherhi the glorie of vietorie consisted ; aduising the king not to shew his manhood in famishing a multi- ^ Lewis was a contenipprary of the events dTamatized in Men. V., Acts I. -IV. He died on December 18, 1415. — Mons., iii. 366 ; Jovmcd, xv. 210. His brother, &e Dauphin John, died on April 3 (ffownaH,, 216) or 4 {Mom., iii. 408), 1417. During the historic time embraced by Apt V. the Dauphin was Charles, who afterwards reigned as Oharles VII., and is a character in 1 Hm. VL 2 " Eodem anno [1414] in Quadragesima rege existente apud KenUworth, Karolus [se. Ludovicus], regis Francorum filius, Dalphinus vqcatus, misit pilas Parisianas ad ludenduni cum pueris." — Ott, 274. In 1414 Ash Wedn«igday fell on February 21. * A speech, similar in outline, is attributed to Heniy by Bedmcm (55). I quote from it a pass^e which has some resemblance to that in which Henry takes credit to himself for employing the "meekest maid" to punish Eouen: " Benigne et clementer omnia me adiainistrare nemo est qui non intelligat, cum fame potius quam ilamma, ferro, aut sanguine, Eotomagum ad deditionem perpello." * The forces blockading Eouen were ordered to take up their positions on August 1, 1418. — Page, 6. On January 2^ 1419, Henry gave audience to the ambassadors from Eouen. — Page, 26-28. Eoumi opened her gates on January 19, 1419.— Pagfe, 41, 42. Page was present at the mge.—Pfige, 1. 166 VIII. HENRY V. [Henry tu > ^"eiiS" tyrants had put them out of the towne, to the intent he should BoM^must slaie them; and yet had he saued their Hues, so that, if anie btaie J* lacke of charitie was, it rested in them, and not in him. But to their cloked request, he meant not to gratifie them within so much ; but they should keepe them still to helpe to spend their vittels. And as 'to assault the towne, he told them that he [He will would they should know, he was both able and willing thereto, course to as he should see occasion: but the choise was in his hand, to city.] tame them either with blood, fire, or famine, or with them all; VIII. HENRY V. 167 ■whereof he would take the choise at his pleasure, and not at theirs. Act I. sc. i. — Henry Ohichele Archbishop of Canterbury tells John Fordham Bishop of Ely ^ that a bill for disendowing the Church, -which nearly passed in the eleventh year of Henry IV. 's reign, has been revived. If this bUl were carried, the clergy must lose "the better halfe " of their " Possession" : For all the TemporaU Lcmds, which men deuout By Testament haue giu&n to the Church, "Would they strip from vs ; being valu'd thus : As much as would mai/ntame, to the Kings honor, 12 'ExiW. ffteene Earles, And Jifteene htmdred Knights, Six thxmsamd and two hwnd/red good Esquires ; And, to relief e of Lazars, and weake age Of indigent faint Soules, past corporall toyle, 16 A hv/nd/red Ahnes-hovses, right well supply'd ; And to the Goffers of the King, beside, A thousand povmds by th'yeere. Thus runs the Bill. Holinshed took from Halle (49) the following account of the renewal of this bill : [Hoi. iii. 545/2/6.] In the second yeare of his reigne, king Annoseg.% Henrie called his high court of parlement, the last dale of Aprill, 1414 in the towne of Leicester ; in which parlement manie profitable at^ioester. lawes were concluded, and manie petitions mooued were for that time deferred. Amongst which, one was, that a bill exhibited in the parlement holden at Westminster, in the eleuenth yeare of king Henrie the fourth (which by reason the king was then troubled with ciuill discord, came to none effect), might now with good deliberation be pondered, and brought to some good conclusion. The effect of which supplication was, that the temporall lands auu ,,.,.,■ , ,. . ■, 1 exhibited to (deuoutue g%'mn, and disordinathe spent by religious, and other theparUmM spirituall persons) should be seized into the kings hands ; sith the "^ii^- same might suflElce to mainteine, to the honor of the king, and defense of the realme, fifteene earles, ffteene hundred knights, six thousand and two hundred esquiers, and a hundred almesse-houses, for relief e onelie of the poore, impotent, and needie persons ; and the hing to haue cleerelie to his coffers twentie thousand pounds: with manie other prouisions and values of religious houses, which I passe ouer. » Bishop of Ely from 1388 to l^f>,—Qodwm, 274 168 VIII. HENEY V. [The clergy resolved to divert Henry's attention from the die- endowment hiU.] The arch- hUlwpof Canturburies oration in the parle- ment house. My next excerpt shows how the danger was averted : [Hoi. iii. 545/2/29.] This bill was much noted, and more feared, among the religious sort, whom suerlie it touched verie neere ; and therefore to find remedie against it, they determined to assaie all waies to put by and ouerthrow this bill : wherein they thought best to trie if they might mooue the kings mood with some sharpe inuention, that he should not regard the importunate petitions of the commons.^ Wherevpon, on a dale in the parlement, Henrie Chichelie archbishop of Canturburie made a pithie oration, wherein he declared, how not onelie the duchies of Normandie and Aqui- taine, with the counties of Aniou and Maine, and the countrie of Gascoigne, were by vndoubted title apperteiuing to the king, as to the lawfull and onelie heire of the same ; but also the whole realme of France, as heire to his great grandfather king Edward the third.2 Act I. sc. ii. — In presence of the assembled English peers, Henry calls upon Chichele to show whether the Salic law " or should or should not" bar the King's claim to Prance. I exhibit in parallel columns Holinshed's version ^ of the Archbishop's speech and Shakspere's paraphrase of it. Chichele inveighed Farliamet ofLei/ceter. At'whiche parliarht woi put vp ye Sylle whiche was put vp at ye in ye xi. yere ofkyng Henry the. '^ And this yere [1414] the kyng helde his Pariyamejit at Leyceter, where, amonge other thynges, the foresayd Bylle [Psh., 575, 576] put vp hy the Commons of the lande, for the Temporalties beynge in the Churche, as it is before [towchid in the xi yere of the iiiith Henry], was agayne mynded. In fere wherof, lest the kynge wolde therunto gyue any Comfortable Audy- ence, as testyfye some wryters, certayne Bysshoppes and other hede men of the Churche put y« kyng in mynde to clayme his ryght in Fraunce ; & for the eiployte therof they offrede vnto hym great & notable summes. By reason whereof y" sayd byll was agayne put by, and the kynge sette his mynde for the Eeoouery of the same ; . . .-^Fab., 578. When I said {Mervry V., revised ed.. New Sh. Soo,, p. viii) that " Hall seems to be the sole authority for the revivalof the confiscation scheme in Henry the Fifth's reign," this passage in Fab. was unknown to me. 2 There is not so much as an allusion to these claims of Henry in the accounts of the Leicester Parliament's proceedings given by Bot. Pari, and Mmham (cap. xvii.). When Parliament met at Westminster, on November 19, 1414, the Chancellor (Henry Beaufort) opened the session by a sermon in which he announced that the King had determined to resort to war with France, and therefore needed a large suhsidy. — Pot. Pari., iv. 34. It does not appear from Bot. Pari. (iv. I6/1) that Chichele was one of the triers of petitions in the Leicester Parliament, but we learn from the same authority {Bot. Pa/rl. iv. 35/i) that he held the oflSce of trier in the Parliament of West- minster. He was translated from S. David's to Canterbury. — Godwin, 512. The Pope's confirmation of Chichele's election was requested by Henry in a letter dated on March 23, 1414. — Bymer, ix. 119. The temporalities were restored on May 30, lil4.— Ibid. 131., ' Sol. abridged and turned into the third person a speech which Halle VIII. HENRY V, 169 [Hoi. iii. 545/2/46.] against the Burmised and false fained law Salike, which the Frenchmen alledge euer agmnst the kings of England in baare of their iust title to the crowne of France. The verie words of that supposed law are these : ' In terram Salicam ' mulieres ne succedamt ; ' that is to saie, 'Into the Salike land let •not women suceeed.' Which the French glossers expound to he the real/me of France, a/ad that this law was made by king PJmrmwnd ; whereas yet thevr owne authors aff/rme, that the land Salike is in Germanie, ietweene the riuers ^ Flbe and Sola; and that when Cha/rles the great had ouercome the Saxons, he placed there certevM Frenohvaeia, which hauing in dis- deine the dishonest mcmers of the Germa/ne women, made a law, that the females, should not succeed to any inheritance withm that land, which at this dam is called Meisen : so that, if this be true, this law was not made for the realme Salike Lww Was not deuised for the Bealme of France; Nor did the French possesse the Salike Land Yntillfou/re hundredone and twentie yeeres After defunetion of King Phara- mond, (Idly suppos'd the founder of this Law^ 40 44 [Though the French 8»7 that Phara- mond made the law for France, the Balic land is in Germany, where Charles the Oreat placed certain Frenchmen, J o long after *° Phara- mond's death.] Meama, [Misena, Meissen]. 52 56 assigns to Chiohele (50-52). On his deathbed Henry protested that neither ambition nor the desire of fame prompted him to undertake war with ^France ; " but onelie that, in prosecuting his lust title [to the French crown, through Edward III.], he might ia the end atteiije to a perfect peace, and come to enioie those peeces of his inheritance [from Henry II.], which to him of right belonged : and that, before the be^nning of the same waires, he was fullie persuaded by men both wise and of great holinesse of life, that vpon such intent he might and ought both begin the same warres, and follow them," &c. This last clause has the following sidenote : " Cheeflie Chichelie archb. of Cantur. for dashing y' bUl against the cleargie," &c. Cp. Henry's appeal' to Chichele (I. ii 13-32 ; 96). 170 Vm. HENEY V, [Pippin traced his title to t]]6 French crown through the female line, and so also did Hugh CapetJ [Therefore the king of England cannot be barred from claiming France the yecure 426, amd Cha/rUs the great subdued the Saxons, amd placed the Frenchmen, in those parts beyond the riuer of Sala, im the yea/re 805. Moreouer, it appearetli by thevr owne writers, that kmg Pepme, which deposed ChUderike, claimed the crowne of France, as - heire generaU, for that he was descended of Blithild, doMghter to leimg Clo- ihavr \jp. 546] the first. Hugh Capet also, {who vsurped the crowne vpon Charles duke of Loraine, the sole hevre male of the lime amd stocke of Charles the great,) to make his title seeme true, and appeare good, {though in deed it was starke na/ught^ conueied hvm- selfe as heire to the ladie Lvnga/rd, daughter to king Cha/rlemaine, sonne to Lewes the emperour, that was son to Cha/rles the great. King Lewes also, the tenth,^ (otherwise called saint Lewes,) being verie heire to the said vsurper Hugh Capet, could neuer be satisfied in his conscience how he might iustlie keepe and possesse the crowne of France, tiU he was persuaded and fuUie in- structed, that queerne IsdbeU his gramdmiotherwas lineallie descended of the ladie Frmengard, da/ughter and heire to the aboue named Charles duke of Loraine; by the which marriage, the bloud and line of Charles the great was againe vnited and restored to the crowne & scepter of France ; so that more cleere than the sunme it openlie appeareth, that the title of king Who died ■within the yeere of our 60 Bedemption Foure hundred twentie six ; and Charles the Great Subdu'd the Saxons, and did seat the French Beyond the Riuer Sala, in the yeere Eight hundred flue. Besides, their 64 Writers say, KiTig Pepin, which deposed CHI- Did, as Eeire GeneraU, (being descended Of Blithild, which was Daughter to King Olothair,) Make Clayme and Title to the 68 Crowne of France. Bugh Capet also, {who iisurpt the Of Charles the Duke of L&raine, sole Heire male Of the true Line and Stock of Charles the Qreat,) To find his Title with some shewes 72 of truth, (Though, in pure truth, it was corrupt and naught,) Conuey'd himselfe as Hk' Scire to th' Lady Lingare, Daughter to Charlemaine, who was the Sonne To Lewes the Emperour, and Lewes, 76 the Sonne Of Charles the Qreat. Also King Lewes the Tenth, "Who was sole Heire to the Vsvrper Could not keepe quiet in his conscience, Wearing the Crowne of France, 'till 80 That faire Queene Isabel, his Grand- mother, Was Lineall of the Lady Ermengare, Daughter to Charles the foresaid Duke of L&raine : By the which Marriage, the Lyne of 84 Charles the Great Was Te-vnited to the Crowns of France. So that, as cleare as is the Summers King Pepins Title, and Hugh Capets Clayme. King Lewes his satisfaction, all 88 appeare To hold in Right and Title of the * flbJ.'s slip misled Shakspere. ninth" (51). Halle has : " Kyng Lewes also the VIII. HENRY V. 171 Pepin, the clairm of Hugh Capet, the possession of Lewes; yea, and the French Mngs to this dme, are deriued and conueied from the heire female ; though they would, vnder the colour of such a fained law, harre the kings and princes of this reakne of England of their right and lawfull inheritance. The archbishop further alledged out of the hoohe of Nwmbers this saieng : ' When a man dieth. with- 'out a Sonne, let the inheritance ' descend to his daughter.' through the same line of descent.] So doe the Kings of France vnto this clay; Howbeit fhey would hold vp this Salique Law To bcMrre your Highnesse olayming 92 from the Female ; And rather chuse to hide them in a Net, Then amply to imbarre their crooked Titles Vsurpt from you and your Pro- genitors. King. May I, with right and 96 conscience, make this claim ? [The book of Cant. The sinne vpon my head, Numbers.! dread Soueraigne ! For in the Booke of Nwmbers is it writ, " When the num dyes, Id the In- heriianee ' ' Descend vnto the Daughter. " 100 Chichele then reminds Henry how Edward III., "on a HiU, stood "; watching the Black Prince defeat "the full Power of France," with but half of the English army (I. ii. 105-110). Holinshed records (iii. 372/2/27) how a knight, sent to ask Edward for reinforcements, came "where" the King "stood aloft on a windmill hill," surveying the battle.1 When Westmoreland says that the hearts of the English nobles are in France, Chichele exclaims : O let their bodyes follow, my deare Liege, With Blood and Sword and Fire, to win your Bight ! In &jde whereai, -we of the Spiritttaltie 132 Will rayse your ffighnesse such a mightie Svmrm, As neuer did the Clergie at one time Bring in to any of your Ancestors. Chichele, [Hoi. iii. 646/ 1/30.] hauing said sufficientlie for the proofe of the kings iust and lawfull title to the crowne of France, he exhorted him to aduance foorth his banner to fight for his righi, to conquer his inheritance, to spare neither iloud, sword, not fire; sith his warre was iust, his cause good, and his claime true. And to the intent his louing chapleins and obedient subiects of the spwituaUie might shew themselues willing and desirous to aid his maiestie, for the recouerie of his ancient right and true inheritance, the archbishop declared that, in their spirituall conuocation, they [Chichele urged Henry to make war, and promised him a larger sum of money than the clergy had ever paid to any prince.] * An incident which Charles VI. reminds his nobles of {Ren. V., II. iv. 53-62). 172 Vlir. HENRY V. The earle of Westmer- landper- iuadeiky^ hing to the conquest of ScoHaitd. had granted to his highnesse such a summe of inonie, as neuer by no spirituall persona was to any prince before those daies giuen or aduanced.^ CMchele answers Henry's fear, that the Scot might pour down upon defenceless England, by recalling the day (October 17, 1346) when David n. was vanquished and taken prisoner, during Edward III.'s absence in France. — Aveshury, 145, 146. For the unhistorical assertion that David was sent to France (1. 161), Shakspere was perhaps indebted to the play of Kimg Edwa/rd III., where (Act IV. sc. ii. p. 53) we find Edward resolving to summon Copeland, David's captor, hither out of hand, And with him he shall bring his prisoner king. In the last scene (Act V. sc. i. p. 71), which is laid at Calais, Copeland enters, " and King David." To Chichele's instance Westmoreland replies (11. 166-168) : But there's a saying very old and true : " If that you will Framce win, " Then with Scotland first begin." After recording Chichele's speech, and offer of a subsidy, Holinshed adds: [Hoi. iii. 546/1/44.] When the archbishop had ended his pre- pared tale, Rafe Neuill, earle of Westmerland, and as then lord Warden of the marches against Scotland, vnderstanding that the king, vpon a couragious desire to recouer his right in France, would suerlie take the wars in hand, thought good to mooue the king to begin first with Scotland; and therevpon declared how easie a matter it should be to make a conquest there, and how greatlie the same should further his wished purpose for the subduing of the Frenchmen ; concluding the summe of his tale with this old saieng : that, " Who so will France win, must with Scotland first War with France being resolved on, audience is given to ambas- sadors from the Dauphin. They present to the King a " Tun ^ of 1 The Convocation of Canterbury met on October 1, 1414, and broke up on October 20, 1414, after granting Henry two whole tenths. — Wahe, 350, 351. This convocation was summoned for the settlement of matters relating to church discipline, as the mandate {Wake, Appendix, 87) shows. 2 Perhaps "Tunne" = a cwp. Higins {Nomenolator, 1585, p. 233, col. 1) defined "Ooseyphium '' as "a twn, or nut to drinke in." In The Famovs Victories, sc. ix., p. 29, the ambassador's action is described by this stage direction : " He deliuereth a Tunne of Tennis Balles." Henry says : " What, a guilded Tunne ? I pray you, my Lord of Yorke, looke what is in it." York answers: " Here is a Carpet and a Tunne of Tennis balles." VIII. HENRY V, IT'S Treasure " (1. 255), containing tennis-balls (1. 258) ; a gift which their master deems "meeter for" Henry's "spirit" than French dukedoms. Of this incident Holinshed gives the following account : [Rol. iii. 545/1/1.] Whilest in the Lent season the king laie at f*""' . Killingworth, there came to him from Charles [sc. Lewis] Dolphin ^amiaiaaae of France certeine ambassadors, that brought with them a barrell [The of Paris balles ; which from their maister they presented to him for '^l.^ a token that was taken in verie ill part, as sent in scorne, to signifie, that it was more meet for the king to passe the time with such childish exercise, than to attempt any worthie exploit. Part of Henry's answer (11. 264-266) to the ambassadors — Tell him, " he hath made a match with such a Wrangler, " That all ihe Gowrta of Frcmce will be disturb'd " With Chaces " — may be derived from the concluding portion of this excerpt : \Hol. iii. 545/1/9.] Wherfore the K. wrote to him, that yer ought long, he would tosse him some London balles that perchance IloS^'d should shake the walles of the best court in France} baiies.'] Act II. Chorus. — ^When Shakspere Wrote 11. 8-10, — For now sits Expectation in the Ayre ; And hides a Sword, from Hilts vnto the Point, With Crownes Imperiall, Crownes, and Coronets , — he may have been thinking of a woodcut-portrait of Edward III.,^ — engraved on page 174, — which appeared in the first edition of Holinshed (1577, vol. iii. p. 885). Act II. sc. ii. — This scene is laid at Southampton, in August, 1415.^ 1 Cp. the rest of the passage in Ott. (cited above, p. 165) : " Cui rex Anglorum reecripsit, dicens, se in brevi pilaa missurum Londoniarum quibus terreret [tereret] & confiinderet sua tecta." Henry's threat that the Dauphiu's balls shall become " Qun-stones " (I. ii. 282) may be Shakspere's reminiscence of Caxton {Chronicle, ed. 1482, sign. t. 5), who says that Henry " lete make tenys balles for the dolphyn in al the hast that they myjt be made, and they were grete gorme stmies for the Dolphyn to playe with all." But a cannon- shot was called a gunstone in Shakspere's time. See examples in the revised ed. of Henry V. (New Sh. Soc), p. 162. In a contemporary poem, ascribed to Lydgate, Henry speaks of a * game at tynes " which Ms guns " shall play with Harflete."— C9w/ it was called Agincourt, he said, "Then shall this conflict be called " the battell of Agincourt." " Fought on the day of Crispin Crispianus ! " adds Henry, when he has named the battle, After telling us how the English behaved on the night of October 24 (see p. 187 above), Holinshed continues : 1 According to Mons. (iii. 346) both these replies were given on the day of the battle. He does not say that Montjoy asked leave to bury the dead. The French dead were left unhuried till Henry quitted Agincourt, on October 26.— Mons., iii. 357. VIII. HENRY V. 195 [Sol. iii. 552/2/90.1 The daie following was the flue and Thebattaio/ ^ II'-' " Agincourtf twentith of October in the yeare 1415 ; being then fridaie, and the o 'ike a graue and sober personage, and as one remem- bring from whom all victories are sent, seemed little to regard such vaine pompe and shewes as were in triumphant sort deuised for modatu: of his wclcomming home from so prosperous a iournie : in so much the king. ^ '■ ^ [He wotdd that he would not suffer his helmet to be caried with him, whereby Tint sufffiir his helmet might hauc appeared to the people the blowes and dints that were with him.] to be seeue in the same ; neither would he suffer anie ditties to be made and soong by minstrels of his glorious victorie, for that he would wholie haue the praise and thanks altogither giuen to God. The last occurrence of the Interim is^ that (11, 38, 39) The Emperour's comming ^ in behalf e of France, To order peace betweene them ; . . . 1 On November 23.— Ge^ta, 61. 2 "Emperour's cominuig"="Er(iperour is cojnining" : assuming "As yet . . . between them " (11. 36-39) to be a parenthesis. VIII. HENRY V. 199 On or about May 1, 1416,^ [ffol. iii. 556/2/27.] the emperour Sigismund . . . came into i^e^^ England, to the intent that he might make an attonement S£JS'i««o betweene king Henrie and the French king: . . . Mgiano. Act Y. sc. ii. — ^This scene eiids with Eathariiie of Talois's betrothal to Henry V. (11. 376-397), on May 21, 1420. The Duke of Burgundy who speaks in this scene, and who, as appears from my next excerpt, sent " ambassadours ... to mooue " Henry " to p6ace," was Philip the Good, son of John the Fearless, whom Charles VI. addresses in III. v. 42.2 jjj September (i),^ 1419, while Henry was at Eouen, [Hoi. iii. 572/1/ 1 8.] there came fo him eitsoones ambassadours from the French king and the duke of Burgognie to mooue him to peace. The king, minding not to be reputed for a destroier of the countrie, ivhich he coueted to preseme, or for a causer of christian King umrui bloud still to be spilt in his quarell, began so to incline and giue eth to a eare vnto their sute and humble request, that at length, (after often p"^'- sending to and fro,) and that the bishop of Arras, and other men of honor had beene with him, and likewise the earle of Warwike, and the bishop of Rochester had beene with the duke of tiurgognie, they both finallie agreed vpon certeine articles ; so that the French king and his commons would thereto assent. Now was the French king and the queene with their daughter Katharine at Trois in Champaigne ; gouerned and ordered by them, which so much fauoured the duke of Burgognie, that they would not, for anie earthlie good, once hinder or pull backe one iot of such articles as the same duke should seeke to preferre. And therefore what needeth manie words 1 a truce tripartite was accorded £.<™f. betweene the two kings and the duke, and their countries ; and order taken that the king of England should send, in the companie of the duke of Burgognie, his ambassadours vnto Trois in Champaigne ; sufficientlie authorised to treat and conclude of so great matter. The king of England, being in good hope that all his ad'au'es should take good successe as he could wish or desire, 1 Ac66Jding to Chrcm. Land. (103)' : "the flrfete day of Maij, at nyght, he [Sigismimd] landed at Dovorr." ^ Philip was then (October, 1415) Coimt of Charolois. He is addressed by Charles VI. (III. v. 45). 3 Mons., iv. 203-207. The murder of John the Fearless, on September 10, 1419 (Mom., iv. 179), caused his son to take this step. 200 VIII. HENRY V. fi^^T^' ^®°* *° *'^^ ^^^ "f Burgognie, his vncle the duke of Excester, the ^hHng. earle of Salisburie, the bishop of Elie, the lord Fanhope, the lord Fitz Hugh, sir lohn Robsert, and sir Philip Hall, with diuerse doctors, to the number of fiue hundred horsse; which in the' companie of the duke of Burgognie came to the citie of Trois the eleuenth of March. The king, the queene, and the ladie Katharine them receiued, and hartUie welcomed ; shewing great signes and tokens of loue and amitie. The articiK After a few dales they fell to councell. in which at length it was "conciS' concluded, that king Henrie of England should come to Trois, and betweene hiTig Bmrie ami marie the ladie Katharine ; and the king hir father after his death the French ... *»"«'• should make him heire of his realme, crowne, and dignitie. It was also agreed, that king Henrie, during his father in lawes life, should in his steed haue the whole gouernement of the realme of France, as regent thereof : with manie other couenants and articles, as after shall appeere. Burgundy begins an appeal for peace by reminding the sovereigns of England and France (11. 24-28) how he has laboured to bring them Vnto this Barre and E,oyall enterview, . . . Perhaps Shakspere supposed that the same course was taken at Troyes as had been adopted at Meulan, where, on May 29, 1419,^ Henry, Queen Isabelle, the Princess Katharine, and John Duke of Burgundy, met to hold a personal conference which, it was hoped, might lead to a peace between England and France. Henry then had his ground [Henry's [Hol. iu. 569/2/2.] barred about and ported, wherin his tents ?S^ed were pight in a princelie maner. about."] ^ ° ^ Burgundy winds up his speech by desiring to know " the Let " (1. 65) which hinders the return of Peace to Fiance. Henry answers (U. 68-71) : If, Duke of Burgonie, you would the Peace, Whose want giues growth to th'imperfections Which you haue cited, you must buy that Peace With fuU accord to aM our iust demands, . . . Shakspere may have been thinking of the unsuccessful close of the conference at Meulan, when Henry, [The Met' to [Sol. ui. 569/2/43.] mistrustuig that the duke of Burgognie deliiresf] was the veric let and stop of his desires, said vnto him before his departm-e : " Coosine, we will haue your kings daughter, and all * Bymer, ix. 759. VIII. HENRY V. 201 " things that we demand with hir, or we will driue your king and "you out of his realme." Charles VI. then retires to scrutinize the treaty of peace j and is attended by some members of the English Council, whom Henry thus names (11. 83-85) : Goe, Vnckle Exeter, And Brother Clarence, and you, Brother Gloucester, Warwick, and Huntington, goe with the King ; . . . Henry went to Troyes, [Sol. iii. 572/2/8.] accompanied with his brethren the dukes [The English T)6fiFS who of Clarence and Glocester, the earles of Warwike, Salisburie, ^^^^ Huntington, . . .^ ^»y''-i A revision of the treaty, after Henry's arrival at Troyes, is noticed by Holinshed, who says that [Rol. iii. 572/2/32.] the two kings and their councell assembled togither diuerse dales ; wherein the first concluded agreement was rrhe treaty , reviBed] in diuerse points altered and brought to a certeinetie, according to the effect aboue mentioned.^ Queen Isabelle desires to have a voice in discussing the treaty ; whereupon Henry asks that the Princess Katharine may remain with him : She is our capitall Demand, compris'd Within the fore-ranke of our Articles. — ^11. 96, 97. The first article of the treaty of Troyes runs thus : [Hoi. iii. 573/ 1/6 1.] 1 First, it is accorded betweene our father and TS, that forsomuch as by the bond of matrimonie made for the good of the peace betweene vs and our most deere beloued Katharine,^ daughter of our said father, & of our most deere 1 Charles {St. Bervys, vi. 410), IsabeUe, and Clarence (Jw., 480), were at Troyes when Henry married Katharine. On December 30, 1419, Gloucester was appointed Warden of England because Bedford had been summoned to join Heniy. — Symer, ix. 830. Gloucester was to hold office during the King's absence. — Ibid. From what Exeter says in a letter written at Troyes, on May 23, 1420, I infer that he was present at the convention and betrothal. — Rymer, ix. 907, 908. On June 4, 1420, Henry resumed bis campaign (Gesta, 142) ; and, in July, 1420, he had with him, at the siege of Melun, Clarence, Bedford, Exeter, Huntingdon, and Warwick. — Gesta, 144. Weds., ii. 335. '■^ See excerpt at p. 200 above. 8 In May, 1419, Katharine was at Meulan (p. 200 above), having been brought thither " by hir mother onelie to the intent that the king of England, beholding hir excellent beautie, should be so inflamed and rapt in hir loue, that he, to obteine hir to his wife, should the sooner agree to a gentle peace 202 VIII. HENRY V. [Filial reverence due ttoTn Henry to Katharine's parents.] (Henry to be styled heir of fVance.] King Hinrie etymmeth to Trois to thA JFreTich king. King Henrie Oijgkth the French kings daughter. moother Isabel! his wife, the same Charles and Isabell beene made our father and moother : therefore them as our father and moother vre shall bane and worship, as it fitteth and seemeth so worthie a prince and princesse to be worshipped, principallie before all other temporal! persons of the world. Soon after the re-entry of Charles, Isabelle, Biirgundy, and the rest, Exeter points out that an article of the treaty has not yet been subscribed (11. 364-370) : " Where your Maiestie demands, ' That the King of France, hauing any occasion to write ior matter of Graunt,^ shall name your Highnesse in this forme, and with this addition, in French: Nostre tresoher filz Henry, Roy d'Anghterre, Heretere de Frounce ; and thus in Latvne : Prceela/rissvmus Filiics noster Henricus, Bex AnglicB, & Heres Francim.' " This article appears in Holinshed with the same mistranslation of treschier ^ as is found in Shakspere's text. [Sol. iii. 574/2/69.] 25 Also that our said father, during his life, shall Tiame, call, and write vs in French in this maner : Nostre treschier fih Henry roy d'Engleterre heretm'e de France. And in Latine in this maner: Frceclarissimus filius noster Henricus rex AnglicB & hmres Franctce. Isabelle having invoked God's blessing on the wedlock which is to bring with it the union of England and France (II. 387-396), Henry says (11. 398-400) : Prepare we for our Marriage ! on which day, My Lord of Burgundy, wee'le take your Oath, And all the Peeres, for suretie of our Leagties. On reaching Troyes, Henry rested a while, and then [Hoi, iii. 572/2/26.] Went to visit the French king, the queene^ and the ladie Katharine, whome he found in saint Peters chilrch, where was a verie ioious meeting betwixt them ; (and this was on the twentith daie of Maie ;) ^ and there the king of England and the ladie Katharine were affianced. and louing concord."— BbJ. iii 569/2/1 1. The conferences at Meulan led to no result, " saue onlie that a certeine sparke of Mming lone was kindled in the kings heart by the sight of the ladle Katharine." — Hoi. iii. 669/2/38; 1 By article 23 it is stipulated that, as a rule, " grants of offices and gifts . . . shall be written and proceed vmdei the name and seale of " Charles VI. —Hoi. 574/2/51. ^ Prceda/rissimtis] Hoi. edd. 1 and 2. PreeUmssimus Halle (ed. 1-550). PreeharissimuSf Halle (edd. of 1548). 5 May 21. In a letter written at Troyes on May 22j 1420, and addressed to the Duke of Gloucester, Warden of Ei^land, Henry says : " Upon Moneday, the XX. day of this present Moneth of May, wee arrived ia this Towne of VIII. HENRY V, 203 When the terms of the treaty were finally settled, [Hoi. iii. 572/2/37.J the kings sware for their parts to obserae all the couenants of this league and agreement. Likewise the duke of Burgognie, and a great number of other princes and nobles which were present, receiued an oth, . . . I close the excerpts illustrating this play with the panegjrric of Henry, which Holinshed derived from Halle. [Sol. iii. 583/i/S9.] This Henrie was a king, of life without spot ; ^^ nom- a prince whome aU men loued, and of none disdained ; a capteine "^^^(^^ against whome fortune neuer frowned, nor mischance once spurned ; ■^Vm.S ty whose people him so seuere a iusticer both loued and obeied, ^«*ii2]. (and so humane withall,) that he left no offense vnpunished, nor freendship vnre warded; a terrour to rebels, and suppressour of sedition ; his vertues notable, his qualities most praise^wortbie. In strength and nimblenesse of bodie from his youth few to tHen^s him comparable ; for in wrestling, leaping,^ and running, no man ^j^^™* well able to compare. In casting of great iron barres and heauie stones he excelled commonlie all men ; neuer shrinking at cold, nor slothfoll for heat ; and, when he most laboured, his head commonlie vncouered ; no more wearie of harnesse than a light cloake ; verie Taliantlie abiding at needs both hunger and thirst ; so manfull of mind as neuer scene to quinch at a wound, or to smart at the paine ; to turne his nose from euil sauour, or to close ^ his eies from smoke or dust ; no man more moderate in eating and drinking, with diet not delicate, but rather more meet for men of warre, than Troyes ; And on the Morowe hadden a OonTention betwix our Moder the Queene of France, and our Brother the Due of Burgoigne (as Commissairs of the 'K^iT'g of France our Fader for his Party) and Us in our own Personne, for our Partie : And th' Accorde of the . . . Pees Perpetuell was there Swome by both the sayde Commissaires, yn name of our foresaid Fader ; And semblably by Us in, cure owne Name : . . . Also at the saide Convention was Mariage betrowthed betwixt Us and oure Wyf, Doghter of our forsaid Fader the King of France."-^JS!/TOer, ix. 906, 907. The date of the marriage is given in a private letter written at Sens by " Johan Ofort," on June 6, 1420 : " And, as touchyng Tydynges, The Kyng owre Sovereyn Loord was Weddid, with greet Solempnitee, in the Oathedrale Ohirche of Treys, abowte Myd day on Tnnite Sunday " [June 2]. — Rymer, ix. 910. ^ In his wooing of Katharine, Henry says (V. ii. 142-145) : " If I could winne a Lady at Leape-frogge, or by vawting into my Saddle with my Armour on my backe, (vnder the correction of bragging be it spoken,) I should quickly leape into a Wife." ' to turne . . . or to dose] not to i/wrne . . . nor close Hoi. 204 VIII. HENRY -^. [Any honest person migbt speak to him at mealtimes, and he would gladly hear causes himself.] [He slept little, hut very soundly.] [His great abilily in warfare.] [Freedom from wantonness and avarice.] [Equanimity in good or evil fortune.] [Bountiful- ness.] for princes or tender stomachs. Euerie honest person vras per- mitted to come to him, sitting at meale ; where either secretlie or ppenlie to declare his mind. High and weightie causes, as well betweene men of warre and other, he would gladlie heare ; and either determined them himselfe, or else for end committed them to others. He slept verie little, but that verie soundlie, in so much that when his soldiers soong at nights, or minstrels plaied, he then slept fastest ; of courage inuincible, of purpose vnmutable ; so wisehardie alwaies, as feare was banisht from him ; at euerie alarum he first in armor, and formost in ordering. In time of warre such was his prouidence, bountie and hap, as he had true intelligence, not onelie what his enimies did, but what they said and intended : of his deuises and purposes, few, before the thing was at the point to be done, should be made priuie. He had such knowledge in ordering and guiding an armie, with such a gift to incourage his people, that the Frenchmen had constant opinion he could neuer be Tanquished in battell. Such wit, such prudence, and such policie withall, that he neuer enter- prised any thing, before he had fullie debated and forecast all the maine chances that might happen ; which doone, with all diligence and courage, he set his purpose forward. What policie he had in finding present remedies for sudden mischeeues, and what engines in sailing himselfe and his people in sharpe distresses, were it not that by his acts they did plainlie appeare, hard were it by words to make them credible. Wantonnesse of life and thirst in auarice had he quite quenched in him ^ ; vertues in deed in such an estate of souereigntie, youth, and powet, as verie rare, so right commend- able in the highest degree. So staled of mind and countenance beside, that neuer iolie or triumphant for victorie, nor sad or damped for losse or misfortune. For bountifulnesse and liberalitie, no man more free, gentle, and franke, in bestowing rewards to all persons, according to their deserts; for his saieng was, that he neuer desired monie to keepe, but to giiie and spend. Although that storie properlie serues not for theme of praise or dispraise, yet what in breuitie may well be remembred, in truth 1 Sd. (ed. 1) and Halle read: "he . . . didde continually absteyne from lasciuious lyuing and blynde auarice.'' IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 205 •would not be forgotten by sloth ; were it but onlie to remaine as a spectacle for magnanimitie to haue alwaies in eie, and for incour- agement to nobles in honourable enterprises. Knowen be it there- fore, of person and forme was this prince rightlie representing his ^„^'g^eeX] heroicall affects ; of stature and proportion tall and manlie, rather leane than grose, somewhat long necked, and blacke haired, of countenance amiable ; eloquent and graue was his speech, and of great grace and power to persuade : for conclusion, a maiestie was he that both liued & died a paterne in princehood, a lode-starre ^ in [^^^d honour, and mirrour^ of magnificence ; the more highlie exalted in to'^thw""^ his life, the more deepelie lamented at his death, and famous to p™"^'! the world alwaie. IX. HENRY YI. PART I. If the range of The first Pmrt of Hewry the Sixt ' were measured by historic dates, not by the order in which occurrences are dramatized, it might be said that the time embraced by the action extended from Henry V.'s funeral, on November 7, 1422,* to Talbot's death on July 17, 1453. But the dramatist has made the latter event precede Jeanne Dare's capture in 1430 ; as well as the despatch of Suffolk to Tours in 1444, for the purpose of espousing Margaret and conducting her to England. Act I. sc. i. — The funeral of Henry V. is disturbed by the entrance of a messenger who announces a series of calamities (11. 57-61), some of Which are fictitious, while others are antedated.^ Orleans and Poitiers 1 In the Epilogue {Hen. V., 1. 6) he is called ' This Starre of England.' 2 The Chorus of Act II. (1. 6) styles Henry " the Mirror of all Christian Kings." The original, which Hoi. paraphrased, is " the mirror of Christen- dome."— fliiMe, 113. ' 3 In quoting the three Parts of Eenry VI., I follow the text of Fi (1623). * This date is given in Fab. (592), and Wyrc. (ii. 454). The F. entry is : " Enter the Funerall of Bang Henry the Fift, attended on by the Duke of Bedford, Regent of France ; the Duke of Gloster, Protector ; the Duke of Exeter, Warwicke, the Bishop of Winchester, and the Duke of Somerset." The corresponding personages in Hoi. iii. 584/i/i9 {Halle, 114) are : " Thomas duke of Excester, Richard [Beauchamp] earle of Warwike, ... the earle of Mortaigne, Edmund Beaufort [afterwards Duke of Somerset], ..." s The 1st Mess, anticipates the loss of Rheims (1. 60) and Gisors (1. 61). Charles VII. received the keys of the former place in 1429 {Wawrim,, V. iv. 315) ; the latter was surrendered to the French in 1449 {^ievenson, II. ii. 622). Paris opened her gates to them in 1436. To the series of calamities Gloucester prophetically adds Rouen (1. 65), which we lost in 1449. 206 IX. HEURY VI. PART I. were not in our possession at Henry V.'s death ; and Guienne — the last left of our continental dominions save Calais — was not lost till 1451. Perhaps the messenger's report is an embellishment of the succeeding excerpt : ^ vrfdMth t-^"'- '"• 585/2/13. Halle, 15.] And suerlie the death of this &'chto*''* king Charles caused alterations in France. For a great manie of reToit.] |.jjg nobilitie, which before, either for feare of the English puissance, or for the loue of this king Charles, (whose authoritie they followed,) held on the English part, did now reuolt to the Dolphin ; with all indeuour to driue the English nation out of the French territories. Whereto they were the more earnestlie bent, and thought it a thing of greater facUitie, because of king Henries yoong yeares ; whome (because he was a child) they esteemed not, but with one consent reuolted from their sworne fealtie : . . . His assertion, that these reverses were caused by " want of Men and Money " (1. 69) and " Factions " (1. 71) among the English nobles, seems to embody a remark of Holinsbed on the loss of Paris in 1436. Snsion^ t-^"^- "^ 612/2/65. Salle, 179.] But heere is one cheefe Bn^?sh'*''' point to be noted, that either the disdeine amongest the cheefe coundi's*''* peeres of the realme of England, (as yee haue heard,) or the seld^rein- ncgligeuce of the kings councell, (which did not foresee dangers forcements, ,, „, iii.. «t-i caused the to come.) was the losse 01 the whole dommion of France, betweene loss of ' ' France.] tbe riucrs of Sommc 2 and Marne ; and, in especiaU, of the noble citie of Paris. For where before, there were sent ouer thousands for defense of the holds and fortresses, now were sent hundreds, yea, and scores ; some rascals, and some not [p. 613] able to draw a bowe, or carrie a bill : . . . A second messenger brings tidings (1. 92) that The Dolphin Charles is crowned King in Rheimes. 1 If so, the dramatist ignores what Hoi. adds (585/2/3o) : " The duke of Bedford, being greatlie mooued with these sudden changes, fortified his townes- both with garrisons of men, munition, and vittels ; assembled also a great armie of Englishmen and Normans ; and so eflfectuotislie exhorted them to continue faithful! to their liege and lawful! lord yoong king Henrie, that manie of the French capteins wulinglie sware to king Henrie fealtie and obedience ; by whose example the communaltie did the same. Thus the people qmeted, and the countrie established in order, nothing was minded but warre, and nothing spoken of but conquest." Their defeat at Vemeuil— related by Hqli — in 1424 was nearly as disastrous to the French as Agincourt had been ; and the tide of our success did not turn till we besieged Orleans in 1428-29, ^ /Scujime] Halle. Sy the English.] [The bul- wark and hridge-tower entrusted to ■William Glansdale.] W.F. Jehd de Tillet. Zes chronic. deBretaigne, Ze Rosier ealleth him Robert. Jonc de Are Piuell de diffii. the bridge, and fought with the Englishmen; but they receiued him with so fierce and terrible strokes, that he was with all his companie compelled to retire and flee backe into the citie. But the Englishmen followed so fast, in killing and taking of their enimies, that they entered with them. IT The bulworke of the bridge, with a great tower standing at the end of the same, was taken incontinentlie by the Englishmen, who behaued themselues right valiantlie vnder the conduct of their couragious capteine, as at this assault, so in diuerse skirmishes against the French ; partlie to keepe possession of that which Henrie the fift had by his mag- nanimitie & puissance atchiued, as also to inlarge the same. . . . In this conflict, manie Frenchmen were taken, but more were slaine ; and the keeping of the tower and bulworke was committed to William Gla[n]sdale esquier. By the taking of this bridge the passage was stopped, that neither men nor vittels could go or come by that waie. The siege of Orleans, begun by Salisbury on October 12, 1428, wag raised on May 8, 1429 ;i and he was mortally wounded (Act I. sc. iv.) about four months prior to Joan's first meeting with Charles ; ^ the event which is dramatized in this scene. I quote the account given of her by Holinshed : [Rol. iii. 6OO/2/2.] In time of this siege at Orleance (French stories saie), the first weeke of March 1428[-29], vnto Charles the Dolphin, at Chinon, as he was in verie great care and studie how to wrestle against the English nation, by one Robert* Ba[u]dricourt, capteine of Va[u]couleur[s], (made after marshall of France by the Dolphins creation,*) was caried a yoong wench of an eighteene yeeres old, called lone Are,^ by name of hir father (a sorie captured on October 24, 1428, and the attack was made by the English. — Ghron. de Ja Pucdle, ix. 284. The siege began on October 12, 1428. — Ibid., ix. 281. ^ The siege was raised on May 8, 1429. — Ghron. de la Pucdle, ix. 321. ^ Joan reached Chinon on March 6, 1429. — Continuation of Guillaume de Nangis {Qmcherat, iv. 313). Her first audience of Charles was deferred until the third day (March 9) after her arrivaL — Letter of De Boulainvilliers to Pilippo Maria Visconti {Qtdcherat, v. 118 ; cp. iii. 4). ^ Boberf] Peter Hoi. . . * An error. Robert's son (Jean de Baudricourt) was made a marshal of France by Charles VIII. — Ansdme, vii. 113. 5 The earliest instance of "d'Arc" occurs in 1576. — Ncmmelles recherches sur la fa/mUle et swr le nom de Jeam/ne Dare, par M. Vallet de Viriville, p. 30. M. de Viriville cites letters of ennoblement, dated December, 1429, and addressed " Puellae Joannae Dare de Dompremeyo." — Ibid. p. 16. In this document her father is called " Jacobum Dare." IX. HENRY VI. PAET I,- 211 sheepheard) lames of Are, and Isabell hir mother ; brought vp poorelie in their trade of keeping cattell; borne at Domprin invua (therefore reported by Bale, lone Domprin) vpon Meuse in Lorraine, within the diocesse of Thoule. Of fauour was she P"™'' aspect, counted hkesome, of person stronglie made and manlie, of courage "'o^™^™! great, bardie, and stout withall : an vnderstander of counsels though "^^'^"■^ she were not at them ; great semblance of chastitie both of bodie and behauiour; the name of lesus in hir mouth about all hir businesses ; humble, obedient ; and fasting diuerse dales in the weeke. A person (as their bookes make hir) raised vp by power diuine, onelie for succour to the French estate then deepelie in distresse ; in whome, for planting a credit the rather, first the companie that toward the Dolphin did conduct hir, through places t^^J all dangerous, as holden by the English, (where she neuer was i?SIs° afore,) all the waie and by nightertale safelie did she lead : then at ''""^^ the Dolphins sending by hir assignement, from saint Katharins [Her sword church of Fierbois in Touraine, (where she neuer had beene and ^^""e on iron at St. knew not,) m a secret place there among old iron, appointed she ^f^JllSat'^ hir sword to be sought out and brought hir, (that with fine floure IS'cftro. delices was grauen on both sides, ^) wherewith she fought and did *' manie slaughters by hir owne hands. On warfar rode she in • Prom umi jL .0 1 1 » «o/ooJ[wa3 armour *cap a pie & mustered as a man; before hir an ensigne all sheciadm white, wherin was lesus Christ painted with a floure delice in his ^^g^.] hand. Unto the Dolphin into his gallerie when first she was brought ; [^aa^'l^ms and he, shadowing himselfe lehind, setting other gaie lords before ^anl before him to trie hir cunning, from all the companie, with a salutation, piSed"hta° (that indeed marz all the matter,) she pickt him out alone ; ^ who thu aaiuta. thereypon had hir to the end of the gallerie, where she held him la'i^S"''^' an houre in secret and priuate talke, that of his priuie chamber p- asb, was thought verie long,^ and therefore would haue broken it oflF; [His but he made them a signe to let hir saie on. In which (among thought that other), as likelie it was, she set out vnto him the singular feats (for ^'tf^Y™^ sooth) giuen hir to vnderstand by reuelation diuine, that in vertue ^< grand chronic, » Cp. 1 Hen. VI., I. ii. 98-101. « Cp, l Hen. VI., I. ii. 60-67. * "Iteigneir. My Lord, me thinkes, is wry Imig m talhe." — 1 Hen. VI., I. ii. 118. 212 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. of that sword shee should atchiue ; which were, how with honor and promised ^ictorie shee would raise the siege at Orleance, set him in state of orieraTand t^e crowue of France, and driue the English out of the countries Bngush* thereby he to inioie the kingdome alone. Heerevpon he hartened France.] at full, appointed hir a sufficient armie with absolute power to lead gavfiier an them, and they obedientlie to doo as she bad them. Then fell she she relieved to workc, and first defeated, indeed, the siege at Orleance ; by and Orleans, and ' ' > s 'J caused iiim by iucouragcd him to crowne himselfe king of Fi-ance at Reims, eSV* *^^* * ^i**l^ before from the English she had woone. Thus after pursued she manie bold enterprises to our great displeasure a two yeare togither : for the time she kept in state Tutill she were taken and for heresie and witcherie burned ; as in particularities hereafter foUoweth. Act I. sc. iii. — I preface this scene by quoting what Holinshed say^ about the open dissension of Gloucester and Winchester. In 1425 [Rol. iii. 590/2/60. Halle, 130.] fell a great diuision in the realme of England ; which of a sparkle was like to haue grown to a D«Mm«o» great flame. For whether the bishop of Winchester, called Henrie duke of Beaufort, (sonne to lohn duke of Lancaster by his third wifcl *win^h^'^ enuied the authoritie of Humfreie duke of Glocester, protectour of the realme ; or whether the duke disdained at the riches and pompous estate of the bishop ; sure it is that the whole realme was troubled with them and their partakers : . . . The action was partly developed from the first article in a series of five charges against Winchester, preferred by Gloucester at some time after February 18, and before March 7, 1426.1 [Rol. iii. 591/1/68. Salle, 130.] 1 First, whereas he, being protectour, and defendour of this land, desired the Tower to be [Rioiard opcncd to him, and to lodge him therein, Richard Wooduile^ WoodTile . r, • 1 ■, A cie8te?s esquier (hauing at that time the charge of the keeping of the 1 Parliament met at Leicester on February 18, 1426. — Bot. Pari., iv. 295/i. On March 7, 1426, Gloucester and Winchester agreed to submit their differ- ences to the arbitration of a committee of the Upper House. ^-JJot. Pa/th, iv. 297/2. Gloucester's five articles are not in Bot. Pari., but Wiuchester's answers to articles 4 and 5 appear there (298/i-2). " Created Earl Rivers on May 24, 1466.— DugrifosZe, iii. 231/i. Father of •Elizabeth Woodvile, who married Sir John Grey, and .(secondly) Edward IV. WoodvUe's son Anthony is Earl Rivers in Bich. III. IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 213 Tower) refused his desite ; and kept the same Tower against him J^^^ato vndulie and against reason, by the commandement of my said lord oiSJcester of Winchester; .. . Ji^?.^ Winchester styles Gloucester a "most vsurping Proditor" (1. 31). Gloucester retorts (11. 33, 34) ; Stand back, thou manifest Conspirator, Thou that contriued'st to murther our dead Lord ; . . . The fourth article of Gloucester's charges contains this accusation : [Hoi. m. 591/2/33. Halle, 131.] 4 Item, my said lord of Glocester saith and afflrmeth, that our souereigne lord, his brother, that was king Henrie the fift, told him on a tinqie, (when our souereigne lord, being prince, was lodged in the palace of West- minster, in the great chamber,) by the noise of a spaniell, there was on a night a man spied and taken behind a * tapet of the said * or hang- ing. chamjbgr ; the which man was deliuered to the earle of Afundell to [Winchester be examined rpon the cause of his being there at that time ; the man to° which so examined, at that time confessed that he was there by ^°<:e of ' •' Wales, the stirring and procuring of my said lord of Winchester ; ordeined g^^f to haue slaine the said prince there in his bed : wherefore the said earle of Arundell let sacke him ^ foorthwith, and drowned him in j^^tS fa the Thames. ^^^ Obeying their master's command (1. 54), " Glosters men beat out the CardinaUs men, and enter in the hurly-burly the Maior of London and his Officers." The Mayor directs an officer to make " open Proclama- tion " against rioting, and threatens also to " call for Olubs " (11. 71, 84). Gloucester and Winchester then retire. After describing (ii. 595) how, on October 30, 1425, possession of London Bridge was contested by the followers of Gloucester and Winchester, Fabyan says (ii. 596) : And lykely it was to haue ensued great Effucyon of blode shortly P^^^sror therupon, ne had ben the discressyon of the Mayre and his ggol^^.] Brether, that exorted the people, by all Polytike meane, to kepe the kynges peas. Act I. sc. iv. — Lords Salisbury, and Talbot, Sir William Glan^dale^ Sir Thomas Gargrave, and others enter "on the Turrets " of the bridge- tower captured by the English (see p. 210 above), whence, through " a secret Grate," they can " ouer-peere the Citie " (1^. 10, 11). Talbpt's narrative of his captivity and ransom (11. 27-56) contains nothing authentic save the exchange by which he obtained his freedom. But 214 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. Thelord Talbot ran- a(ymed by txchange^ [Talljot at the siege of Orleans.] he was not released until 1433 ^ (Holinshed was wrong in saying that Talbot was ransomed " with out delaie "), and the historic date of this scene is 1428. In 1431 an English force defeated some French troops at Beauvais.2 Many of the Frenchmen were taken. [Hoi. iii. 6O6/2/34. Halle, 164.] Amongst other of the cheefest prisoners, that valiant capteine, Poton * de Santrails, was one ; who without delaie was exchanged for the lord Talbot, before taken prisoner at the batteU of Pataie. But Talbot's association with Salisbury, in the siege of Orleans, is unhistorical. Salisbury was dead, and the 'battle of Patay — which deprived Talbot of his liberty — had not been fought, when Bedford [Hoi. iii. 599/2/48. Halle, 146.] appointed the earle of Suflfolke to be his lieutenant and capteine of the siege ; and ioined with him the lord Scales, the lord Talbot,* sir lohn Fastolfe, and diuerse other right valiant capteins. The following excerpt shows that the circumstances of Salisbury's and Gargrave's deaths (11. 1-22 ; 60-88) are faithfully presented : [Hoi. iii. 599/2/5. Halle, 145.] In the tower that was taken r^^ English at the bridge end (as before you haue heard) there was an high chamber, hauing a grate full of barres of iron, by the which a man might looke all the length of the bridge into the citie ; at which grate manie of the cheefe capteins stood manie times, viewing the citie, and deuising in what place it was best to giue the assault. They within the citie well perceiued this tooting hole, and laid a peece of ordinance directlie against the window. It so chanced, that the nine and fiftith dale ^ after the siege was laid, the earle of Salisburie, sir Thomas Gargraue, and William Gla[n]sdale, with diuerse other went into the said tower, and so into the high chamber, and looked out at the grate ; and, within a short space, the sonne of the maister-gunner, perceiuing men looking out at the window, tooke his match, (as his father had taught him ; who was gone downe to dinner,) and fired the gun ; the shot whereof brake and shiuered the iron barres of the grate, so that one of the same bars strake the earle so violentlie on the head, that it stroke used to view Orleans from a window in the bridge- tower. The hesieged pointed a guji against this tooting hole (spy- hole).] [One day, when Salisbnry, Gargrave and Glans- dale were looking out at the window, the master- gunner's son fired, and mortally wounded Salisbury and Gargrave.] Th£ earle of Saliiburie 1 Rymer, x. 536. ' Potori] Pouton Hoi. * Talbot and the others left Chron. de la FucdU, ix. 287. 2 Journal, xv. 427, 428. for Orleans on December 29, 1428.- 6 See p. 209, n. 2, above. IX. HBXRY VI. PART I. 215 awaie one of his eies, and the side of his cheeke.^ Sir Thomas [and sir Gargraue was likewise striken, and died within two daies. Gaigrav^ After a messenger bi?irigsnews that Charles and Joan are coming to raise the siege (11. 100-103), and during the two remaining scenes o£ Act I., historic time must be supposed to have advanced from October, 1428 — its position in sc. iv. 11. 1-97 — ^to April 29-May 8, 1429. When Joan had received " a sufficient armie " (p. 212 above), she [ffol. iii. 600/2/68. Halle, 148.] roade from Poictiers to Blois, and there fovmd men of warre, vittels, and munition, readie to be conueied to Orleance. Heere was it knowne that the Englishmen kept not so diligent watch as they had been accustomed to doo, and therefore this maid (with other French capteins) comming forward in the dead time of the [p. 601] night, and in a great raine and thunder, [Joan enters [Cp. I. iv. 97] entred into the citie ^ with all their vittels, artillerie, and other necessarie prouisions. The next dale the Englishmen boldlie assaulted the towne, but the Frenchmen defended the walles, so as no great feat worthie of memorie chanced that dale [The English ^ assanit betwixt them, though the Frenchmen were amazed at the valiant ori««°«-3 attempt of the Englishmen: whervpon the bastard of Orleance gaue knowledge to the duke of Alanson, in what danger the towne stood without his present helpe ; who, comming within two leagues * Mons. (v. 194) says that Salisbury "ainsi blessd, . . . v^quit I'espace de huit jours." He died at Meung, " au bout de huit jours de eadite blessure." — . JMd. If this limit of time be accepted, we must suppose that Salisbury was mortally wounded on or about October 27, for it appears from various inquisi- tions post mortem dated in January, 1429, — whien were examined by Mr. Oswald Barron, — that the Earl died on November 3, 1428. The date Nov. 3 agrees with the following record of a contemporary chronicler : " le regent de France . . . partist de Paris . . . le mercredi, veille de Saint-Martin d'yver [Nov. 10] mil quatre cent vingt^huit. Et le comte de Salcebry estoit mort la sepmaine devant." — Journal, xv, 379. The date Oct. 27 is not, however, reconcUeable with Mons.'s assertion (v. 194) that Salisbury was wounded on the third day of the siege. According to the more exact Chron. de la Pucdle the siege began on October 12 (ix. 281, 282) ; the bridge-tower was taken by the English on October 24 (ix. 284, 285) ; and, on October 25, the French fortified their end of the bridge and planted guns to batter the tower (ix. 285, 286). After October 25 "advint un jour" on which Salisbury was mortally wounded (ix. 286). It does not necessarily follow that, because Mons. gave a wrong prior date, — the third day of the siege, — ^he was therefore mistaken in regard to the length of time during which Salisbury lingered between life and death. The begmning of the siege is vaguely dated by Mons. "environ le mois d'octobre." — v. 192. ' ' On 4pril 29, 1429.— Chron. de la Fucdle, ix, 309. 216 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. of the citie, gaue knowledge to them within, that they should be readie the next daie to receiue him. muIt™ J This accordinglie was accomplished : . . . The relief of OrleanB was speedily followed by the recapture of the tower at the bridge-foot. But, when the French assailed Talbot's bastile, he " issued foorth a,gainst them, and gaue them so sharpe an incounter, that they, not able to withstand his puissance, fled (like sheepe before the woolfe) againe into the citie, with great losse of men and small artillerie." — Hoi iii. 601/ 1/34. This may be represented by the entry (so. v.) : " Here an 4-larum againe, and Talbot pursueth the Dolphin, and driueth him" ; if we allow for a transposition of the French victory at the bridge-foot (denoted by " Then enter loane de Puzel, driuing Englishmen before her") and subsequent repulse. After Talbot's successful defence, the English vainly ofEered battle on open grounds and retired "in good order" from Orleans {Hoi. iii. 6OI/1/22-53). Their departure is indicated by " Alarum, Retreat, Flourish " ; but the preceding alarums and skirmish (11. 26, 32) are mere stage business. Act II. so. i. — Talbot's recapture of Orleans is fictitious, but, on May 28, 1428,^ Le Mans was regained under circumstances somewhat like those dramatized in this scene. We learn that " diuers of the cheefe rulers " of Le Mans agreed with Charles VII. to adinit the French into their city. The enterprise proved successful, and the English [Sol. iii. 598/1/70. Salk, 143.] withdrew without any tarri- ance into the caatell, which standeth at the gate of saint Vincent, whereof was constable Thomas Gower esquier ; whither also fled manie Englishmen ; so as for vrging of the enimie, prease of the [Suffolk number, and lacke of yittels, they could not haue indured long : tie castle, whcrforo they priuilie sent a messenger to the lord Talbot, which messenger then laie at Alanscm, certifieng him in how hard a case they were. to Talbot, ' ° •' a^ing for rj^g ^Q^d Talbot, hearing these newes, like a carefull capteine, in all hast assembled togither about seuen hundred men ; & in the euening departed from Alanson, so as in the morning he came to a castell called Guierch, two miles &om Mans, and ther^ staled a eo^™'^*^ while, till he had sent out Matthew * Gough,^ as an espiall, to vnderstand how the Frenchmen demeaned themselues. • ooche. Matthew * Gough so well sped his businesse, that priuilie in the night he came into the castell, where he learned that the Frenchmen verie neghgentlie vsed themselues, without taking heed 1 My authority for this date is Jqumfd, xv. 3Y4, 375. Ghrenique de la PvmUb (ix. S7S-274) contains details given in my excerpt, and not 'mentioned in Jovvnal. 2 Slain by Jack Cade's followere. See tlie entry of 2 Em. VI., IV. vii. IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 317 to their watch, as though they had beeme out of all danger : which f^l^^^J^^ well vnderstood, he returned againe, and within a mile of the citie ^^^^^'' met the lord Talbot, and the lord Scales, and opened vnto them tS^ all things, according to his credence. The lords then, to make k^ewofus hast in the matter, (bioause the dale approched,) with all speed issued tWre- possible came to the posterne gate ; and, alighting from their tije^i"gonig horsses, about six of the clocke in the morning, they issued out of ^^^Ih the castell, crieng, " saint George ! Talbot ! " th?^°a'" The Frenchmen, being thus suddenlie taken, were sore amazed ; Bhuts.] in so much that some of them, being not out of their beds, got vp rwouwed. in their shirts, and lept o^ler the walles} Other ran naked out of the naked, leandng gates to saue their lines, leaning all their apparell, horsses, armour, <^ t^ey and riches behind them : none was hurt but such asresisted. ^™J The scene closes with the entry of " a Souldier, crying ' a Talbot, a Talbot ! ' " Charles, Joan, Juteafsn, Beso6, and Piinois, " flye, leauing their Clothes hehind." The soldier remarks (11. 78-81) : lie be so bold to take what they haue left. The Cry of Talbot serues m« for a Sword ; For I haue loaden me with many Spoylea, Vsing no other Weapon but his Name. Holinshed says that [Eol. iii. 597/2/14. Salle, 141.] lord Talbot, being both of Boble birth, and of haultie courage, after his comming into France, obteined so manie glorious victories of his enimies, that his onelie name was & yet is dreadfuU to the French nation ; and much '^i^fa renowmed amongst all other people. copS. Act II. SQ. ii. — On the tomb which Salisbury is to have in Orleans shall be engraved, says Talbot, " Wliat a terror he had beene to France " (1. 17). Salisbury's martial ability was thus extolled by Halle, whose words Holinshed copied : [Hoi. iii. 598/2/58. Halle, 144.] This earle was the man at that time, by whose wit, strength, and policie, the English name was much fearefoll and terrible to the French nation; which ©f himselfe might both appoint, command, and doo all things in manmer at his pleasure ; in whose power (as it appeared after his 1 Cp. the stage direetions (1. 38) : _ " Cry : ' S. George I' 'A Talhat!' The French leape ore the waiks in their §hirts,'' 218 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. ^te'^r*' death) a great part of the conquest consisted : for, siierlie, he was ^t^J^nd * ™*° ^^^^ painefull, diligent, and readie to withstand all valiant man. (Jangerous chanccs that were at hand, prompt in counsell, and of courage inuincible ;"so that in no one man, men put more trust; nor any singular person wan the harts so much of all men. Act II. sc. iii. — No source for this scene has yet been discovered. The Countess of Auvergne's surprise at the mean aspect (11. 19-24) of " the Scourge of France " (1. 15), with whose " Name the Mothers still their Babes " (1. 17), does not accord with Halle's description of Talbot. tTalbot a 8Gouj;ge and terror to the French.] [The name of Talhot employed to score children,] [Halle, 230.] This man was to the French people a very scorge and a daily terror ; ^ in so muche that as his person was fearfuU and terrible to his aduersaries present, so his name and fame was spitefull and dreadfiiU to the common people absent ; in so much that women in Fraunce, to feare their yong children, would crye, " the Talbot commeth, the Talbot commeth ! " Act II. sc. iv.' — No one has pointed out a source for this scene and its sequel (III. iv. 28-45 ; IV. i. 78-161). From the next scene we ascertain (cp. II. v. 45-50, 111-114) that Richard Plantagenet and " Somerset " must have quarrelled on January 19, 1425, the historic date of Mortimer's death. ^ John Beaufort, then Earl of Somerset, was older than Richard, who calls Viim " Boy " (1. 76) ; the former being at that time nearly twenty-one,^ while the latter was about thirteen.* The subsequent action, however, shows that " Somerset " is John's brother, Edmund Beaufort, whom Richard, in 1452, openly accused of treason.^ Edmund Beaufort was about six years older than Richard.* According to Halle, these nobles were foes in 1436, when Richard, who had been appointed to the chief command in France, was embarrassed 1 Cp. the address of the French general, summoned by Talbot to surrender Bordeaux (1 Hen. VI., IV. ii. 15, 16) : " Thou ominous and fearefull Owle of death, Onr Nations ierror, and their bloody scourge I " « Esch. 3 Hen. VI. No. 32 {Proc. Priv. Co., iii. 169, note). 3 John Beaufort completed his twenty-first year on March 25, 1425. — Inq. prob. etatis. 4 H. VI. No. 53 (O.B.). * On December 12, 1415, Richard Plantagenet was of the age of three years and iipwards. — Inq. p. m. 3 H. V. No. 45 (O.B.). 6 See p. 287 below. * An Inq. p. m., taken at Bedford, shows that John Beaufort Duke of Somerset died on May 27, 1444.— Jng. p. m. 22 H. VI. 19 (O.B.). On that day — as appears from an Inq. p. m. teken at Whitechapel, Middlesex, on August 21, 1444 — his heir male, Edmund Beaufort Marquis of Dorset, was of the age of thirty-eight years and upwards. — Inq. p. m. 22 H. VI. 19 (O.B.). IX. HENKY VI. PART I. 219 by Edmund Beaufort's opposition. TJpon this matter Halle made the following comment, the paraphrase of which by Holinshed I quote : ^ [Sol. iii. 6I2/2/22. Halle, 179.] The duke of Yorke, perceiuing [Enmity of his euill will, openlie dissembled that which he inwardlie minded, puntagenet and Edmund either of them working things to the others displeasure ; till, through Beaufort] malice and diuision betweene them, at length by mortall warre they were both consumed, with almost all their whole lines and ofspring. Act II. so. V. — The historical Edmund Mortimer, fifth Earl of March, was, in his youth, under the care and control of Henry Prince of Wales.^ He was not imprisoned when Henry succeeded to the throne, — as was the dramatic Mortimer (11. 23-25), — but served in France, and bore offices of trust.^ On April 27, 1423,* he was appointed Lieutenant in Ireland, and held that post until his death on January 19, 1425. The "Nestor-like aged" Mortimer, with "Feet, whose strength-lesse stay is numme " (11. 6, 13), was taken from a brief obituary notice of him, under the year 1424. [Hoi. iii. 589/2/73. Halle, 128.] During the same season, Edmund Mortimer, the last earle of March [p. 590] of that name, [The last ' L^ J > Mortimer (which long time had beene restreined from his libertie, and finaUie ^aroh'died waxed lame,^) deceassed without issue ; whose inheritance descended ^^^ek wm 1 The passage immediately preceding this quotation is given at p. 252 below. 2 In 1409 the " custodia et gubernatio " — i. e. the jailorship, as the context shows — of March was transferred from Sir John Pelham to Heniy Prince of Wales. — Bymer, viii. 608 ; cp. viii. 639. 8 The muster-roll of the army which went to France in 1417 shows that March was followed by 93 lances and 302 archers. — Gesta, App. 266. In the same year he was captain of Mantes. — Ibid., 277. At Katharine's coronation (February 21, 1421) he was "knelyng on the hye deys on the ryght syde of the queue and held a cepture in hys bond of the quenys." — Cfreg., 139. To the same effect ^"06., 586. During the year 1423 March's presence in the Council is often recorded. — Proc. Priv. Co., ui. 21, et passim. * Proe. Priv. Co., iii. 68. His patent is dated May 9, 1423. — Bymer, x. 282-285. He died at Trim Castle, Co. M.ea,th.— Greg., 158. March was a dangerous possible rival of the House of Lancaster on account of his inherited title to the throne ; and we find that Henry V. did not suffer him " comitivam regiam excedere." When, therefore, March attended the Parliament of 1423-24 with a very large retinue, the Council had misgivings, and sent him into honourable bani^ment as Lieutenant of Ireland. — Chron. Giles {Hen. VI.), 6. He had been appointed to this post in 1423, but it appears from Bymer (x. 319) that ships for his transport to Ireland were not ordered until February 14, 1424. s I suspect that Edmund Mortimer, Earl of March, has been confounded with Sir John Mortimer, who, according to Halle (128) was the Earl's cousin. Sir John Mortimer had been imprisoned in the Tower, whence, about April, 1422, he escaped. Having been soon captured, he was committed to Pevensey 220 IX. HENRy VI. PART I. Bichard Flantage- net] [Richard Flantagenet heir to Darl Edmund.] to the lord Richard Plantagenet, sonne aad heire to Richard earle of Cambridge, beheaded (as before yee haue heard) at the towne of Southampton. Mortimer says to Richard (1. 96) ; Thou art my Seire ; the rest I wish thee gather. Halle-^who was Holinshed's authority for Mortimer's imprisonment — ^adds a few words touching Richard's subsequent course : \HallR, 128.] Whiche Richard, within lease then .xxx. yeres, as Imire, to this erle Edmowd, in open parliament claimed the croune and scepter of this realme, as hereafter shall more manifestly appere.^ Act III. sc. i.— I have quoted above (pp. 209, 212, 213) three of the articles exhibited against Winchester by Gloucester j which, in the opening lines of this scene, the former calls " deepe premeditated Lines," and "written Pamphlets studiously deuis'd." Gloucester brands his rival with sundry vices ^ (11. 14-20), and then makes a specific charge (11. 21-23) : And for thy Trecherie, what's more manifest % In that thou layd'st a Trap to take my Life, As well at London Bridge as at the Tower. "Winchester, as we have seen (p. 209 above), had been accused in the second article of a design to remove the King from Eltham ; and the third article contained the charge in 11. 21-23, arising out of the purposed abduction of Henry VI. \Hol. iii. 591/2/12. Salh, 131.J 3 Item, that where my said Castle, and was afterwards sent again to the Tower. — feoAeguer Issviies, 373, 377, 384, 389. From a petition, addressed by him to the Comraoiis of the Parliament which assembled at Westminster on Dec. 1, 1421, we learn that he was heavily ironed diirmg his confinement in the Tower.^-JJot. Pari., iv, I6O/2. Another petition-^oonjecturally assigned by Niepl^s to the year 1421 — was preferred by his wife Ele^npr to the Duke of Bedford and the Conncil, "istating that her husband was imprisoned underground in the Tower, where he had neither light nor air, and could not long exist ; praying that he might be removed to the prison above-ground, in custody, as he was on his first committal, whence he would not attempt to escape. "r—Proe. Prio. Co., ii., pp. xxxLii., 311, 312. In February, 1424, hp was charged with having asserted "that the erle of Marche shulde be kyng, by ryghl of Enherytajmce, and that he hymselfe was nexte rygbtfull heyre to the aay4 (Browne, after the sayde Erie of Marche ; wherfore, if thp sayd Erie wold nat take vpon hym the Growne, & rule of the Lande, he sayd that he ellys wpldj^.'^ — Fab., ii. 5^3. On Feb. 26, 1424, judgment was delivered against $ir John. ^-Bot. Pari., iv. 202/2. On the same day, apparently, he was belie£»ded. — Ch/ron. Aue. Ign., 6, 7. Halle records (128) the execution, but says nothing about the imprisonment, of Sir John Mortimer. ^ See p. 255 below. 2 Halle's character of Winchester is given in an excerpt illustrating 2 Hen. VI., III. iii. (p. 269 below). IX. HENRY TL PART I. 221 lord of Glocester, (to whome of all persons that should be in the land, by the waie of nature afld birth, it belongeth to see the gouemance of the kings person,) informed of the said vndue purpose of my said lord of Winchester, (declared in the article next {Winchester u6S6u abouesaid,) and, in letting thereof, determining to haue gone to Brito"with Eltham vnto the king to haue prouided as the cause required ; my p,S|^osS^°' said lord of Winchester, vntrulie, and against the kings peace, to aStirof*''* the intent to trouble my said lord of Glocester going to the king, who was ' purposing his death, in case that he had gone that iraie, set men ^J*'^^*° of armes and archers at the end of London bridge next Suthworke ; re^Jj'' and, in forebarrmg of the kings high waie, let draw the chaine of the stoupes there, and set vp pipes and hurdles in manner and forme of bulworks ; and set men in chambers, cellars, & windowes, with bowes and arrowes and other weapons, to the intent to bring finall destruction to my said lord of Glocester's person, as well as of those that then should come with him. While Heiiry preaches peace to his unruly uncles, a " noyse within, ' Down with the Tawny-Coats ! ' ", is heard ; followed by a " noyse lagaine, ' Stones ! Stones ! ' " The Mayor of London entering announces (U. 78-83) that The Bishop and the Duke of Glosters men, Forbidden late to carry any Weapon, Haue fill'd their Pockets full of peeble stones, 80 And, banding themselues in contrary parts, Doe pelt so fast at one anothers Pate, That many haue their giddy braynes knockt out : . . . I'abyan says (596) that the Parliament which witnessed the reconciliation of Gloucester and Winchester was clepyd of the Comon people the Parlyame^t of Battes : the cause was, for Proclamacyons were made, that men shulde leue theyr Swerdes & other wepeyns in theyr Innys,^ the people toke [When other great battes & stauys in theyr neckes, and so folowed theyr lordes were fmbid- and maisters vnto the Parlyament. And whan that wepyn was retimerekt Inhybyted theym, then they toke stonys & plummettes of lede, & ^4°them- trussyd them secretely in theyr sleuys & bosomys. rtonaLT'*^ 1 When Gloucester's and Winchester's servants " skirmish againe," the Mayor is obliged " to make open Proclamation," whereby they are forbidden " to weare, handle, or vse any Sword, Weapon, Or bagger hence-folwatd, vpon pame of death."— 1 Sen. VI., I. iii. 71, &c, Cp. p. 213 above. 223 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. [The Londoners obliged to shnt their Eftiopa.] fWinehes- ter's excul- pation.] (Glonces- tert answer.] [Then they were to take ^each other hy the hand.] The Mayor complains also that Our Windowes are broke downe in euery Street, 84 And wey/or/eare, compell'd to shut our Shops. In 1425, when Grloucester and Winchester were at open strife, [Hoi. iii. 590/2/69. Halle, 130.] the citizens of London were faine to keeps dailie and nightlie watches, arid to shut vp their shops, forfeare of that which was doubted to haue insued of their [Gloucester's and Winchester's] assembling of people about them. Several columns of Holinshed are filled with the formal documents ^ pertaining to the reconciliation of Gloucester and "Winchester (II. 106- 143). The quarrel was submitted to the arbitration of a committee of the Upper House, which wound up the matter by a decree [Rol. iii. 595/1/64. Halle, 137.] that the said lord of Win- chester should haue these words that follow Tnto my said lord of Glocester : " My lord of Glocester, I haue conceiued to my great "heauinesse, that yee should haue receiued by diuerse reports, " that I should haue purposed and imagined against your person, " honor, and estate, in diuers maners ; for the which yee haue " taken against me great displeasure : Sir, I take God to my " witnesse, that what reports so euer haue beene to you of me, " (peraduenture of such as haue had no great affection to me, God " forgiue it them !) I neuer imagined, ne purposed anie thing that "might be hindering or preiudice to your person, honor, or estate ; " and therefore I praie you, that yee be vnto me good lord from "this time foorth : for, by my will, I gaue neuer other occasion, nor "purpose not to doo hereafter, by the grace of God." The which words so by him said, it was decreed by the same arbitrators, that my lord of Glocester should answer and sale : " Faire Tncle, sith " yee declare you such a man as yee sale, I am right glad that it "is so, and for such a man I take you." And when this was doone, it was decreed by the same arbitrators, that euerie each of my lord of Glocester, and Winchester, should take either other by the hand, in the presence of the king and all the parlement, in signe and token of good lone & accord ; the which was doone, and the parlement adiorned till after Easter. 1 The reconciliation of Gloucester and Winchester took place on March 12, U26.-Bot. Farl., iv. 297/i. Tork.1 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 223 GlouoestOT and Winchester having made a truce, Henry wills that " Richard be restored to his Blood " (1. 159), and therefore creates him "Princely Duke of Yorke" (1. 173). Passing from the subject of Gloucester's reconciliation with Winchester, HoUnshed proceeds thus : [Hoi. iii 695/2/30. Halle, 138.] But, when the great fier of this dissention, betweene these two noble personages, was thus by the arbitrators (to their knowledge and iudgement) vtterlie quenched out, and laid vnder boord, all other controuersies betweene other lords, (taking part with the bne partie or the other,) were appeased, and brought to concord ; so that for ioy ^ the king caused a solemne fest to be kept on Whitsundaie ; on which daie he created Richard Plantagenet, sonne and heire to the erle of ^^„et Cambridge, (whome his father at Southhampton had put to death, JJ^^of as before yee haue heard,) duke of Yorke ; ^ not foreseeing that this preferment should be his destruction, nor that his seed should of his generation be the extreame end and finall conclusion. Having reinstated Richard Plantagenet, Henry accepts Gloucester's advice " to be Crown'd in France " (1. 180) without delay ; and hears that the ships which form the royal fleet " alreadie are in readinesse " (1. 186). Gloucester and Winchester were reconciled during the session of a Parliament which met at Leicester on February 18, 1426, and Henry was crowned at Paris on December 16, 1431.* AU now depart except Exeter, who stays to anticipate the renewal of dissension, and the fulfilment of a "fatall Prophecie" (11. 195-199), Which, in the time of Henry nam'd the Fift, Was in the mouth of euery sucking Babe ; That Henry home at Monmouth should winne all, And Hewry horns at Windsor loose all. The prophecy is thus recorded : [Hal. iii. 581/i/68. Halle, 108.] This yeare [1421], at Windsore, 1 Henry was then about five years old. The dramatist did not much exceed his authority by ma^ng the King mediate so eloquently between Winchester and Gloucester. 2 That Richard was not created Duke of York at the Parliament of Leicester — which met on February 18, 1426 — appears from a patent dated February 26, 1425, whereby the King grants to Queen Katharine a house in London formerly belonging to Edmund Earl of March, "in manibus nostris ratione Minoris aetatis carissimi Consanguinei nostri Duels Eborum ezistens, Habendum & Tenendum eidem Matri nostrsa Hospitium prsedictum, durante Miaori setate praedicti Ducis," . . .—Bymer, x. 342. Eapin suggested {Hist. Eng., ed. Tindal, 1732, voL i. p. 545, col. 1) that the mistake arose from Richard having been made a knight at Leicester, in May, 1426 {Bymer, x. 356 cp. X. 358). ' Jovmwl, xv. 433, 434. 224 rX. HENRY VI. PART L Windsore, The birth of king Henrie the sixt. King ffenrie Tprophesieth qfhis i(mne. An excellent finesse in loan'e [ ; a castle taken by means of six men disguised as peasants, and an ambush]. on the dale of saint Nicholas [Dec. 6], in Decembei*, the queene was deliuered of a sonne named Henrie ; whose godfathers were lohn duke of Bedford, and Henrie bishop of Winchester, and laquet, or (as the Frenchmen called hir) laqueline, of Bauier, countesse of Holland, was his godmother. The king, being certified hereof, as he laie at siege before Meaux, gaue God thanks ; in that it had pleased his diuine prouidence to send him a sonne, which might succeed in his crowne and scepter. But, when he heard reported the place of his natiuitie, were it that he Piad been] warned by some prophesie, or had some foreknowledge, or else iudged himselfe of his soimes fortune, he said vnto the lord Fitz Hugh, his trustie chamberleine, these words : " My lord, I Hmrie, " home at Monmouth, shall small time reigne, & much get ; amd " Senrie, borne at Windsore, shall long reigne, and all loose ; but, as "Godwin, so be it." Act III. so. ii. — No date can be assigned to this scene. Chronology and facts are ntterly scorned. Eouen was not surprised and recovered, but willingly received Charles VII. within its walls on October 19, 1449.^ Joan, by whom the dramatic capture of Kouen is effected, was burnt there on May 30, 1431 ;2 and on December 16 of the same year took place the coronation of Henry at Paris, which Talbot proposes; aittending (11. 128, 129). If 1431 be accepted as the time of this scene, — the real circumstances attending our loss of the Norman capital being ignored, — Bedford's death at Eouen (U. 110-114) is antedated, for that event happened on September 14, 1435.^ The fictitious capture of Eouen was, perhaps, an adaptation of a story told by Holinshed, upon Halle's (197) authority. In 1441 * [Hoi. iii. 6I9/2/69. Salle, 197.] Sir Francis the Arragonois, hearing of that chance [the loss of Evreux], apparelled six strong fellowes, like men of the countrie, with sacks and baskets, as cariers of corne and vittels ; and sent them to the castell of Cornill, in the which diuerse Englishmen were kept as prisoners ; and he, [p. 620] with an ambush of Englishmen, laie in a vallie nigh to the fortresse. The six counterfet husbandmen entered the castell ynsuspected, » Jowrnal, xv. 550. ^ Pnch, ix. 186-188. ■ 3 JovA-nal, XV. 465. Or between 2 and 3 a.m. on the 16th..— Ch-eg., 177. * It appears from Halle (197) that not much time had elapsed between the suirender of Evreux to the French and the surprise of this castle by the English. Evreux was yielded by us OH September 14, 1441.— /owrtwrf, XV. 518. IX. HENKY VI, PART I. 225 and streight came to the chamber of the capteine, & laieng hands on him, gaue knowledge to them that laie in ambush to come to their aid. The which suddenlie made foorth, and entered the castell, slue and tooke all the Frenchmen, and set the Englishmen at libertie : . . . Fabyan's account of this stratagem (615) may also have been con- sulted. He says that Sir Francis sette a Busshement nere vnto y* sayd Castell, and in the Dawnynge [a oastie of the mornynge arayed .iiii.^ of his Sowdyours in Husbandemewnes ^^^gli^g™' Aray, and sent theym with Sakkes fylled with dyuers Frutes to oflFer men^^cmr- to sell to the Occupyers of the Castell, The whiche, whan they ami^sp°eiai- _ were comyn to the Gate, and by the langage taken for Frenshmen, anone withoute Susspicion were taken in, and seynge that fewe folkes were stirrynge, helde the Porter muet whyle one gaue the foresayd Busshment knowlege, . . . An incident of the betrayal of Le Mans to the French (see p. 216 above) may have suggested the means employed by Joan to apprize Charles that the gates of Rouen were open. Compare, with the closing words of my next excerpt, the stage direction after 1. 25 (" Enter Pucell on the top, thrusting out a Torch hwrnvng "), and 11, 21-30, The French \Hol. iii. 598/1/46. Halle, 142.] in the night season approched towards the walles, making a little fire on an hill, in sight of the j^nj^^ towne, to signifie their comming ; which perceiued by the citizens ^*°^-^ that neere to the great church were watching for the same, a hu/ming cresset was shewed md of the steeple ; which suddenlie was put out and quenched. Talbot swears to recover Rouen or die, As sure as in this late betrayed Towne, Great Cordelions Heart was buryed (U. 82, 83). Richard I. {Hoi. iii. 156/1/11.] willed his heart to be conueied vnto uatth. Rouen, and there buried ; in testimonie of the loue which he had [Hohard i/s euer borne vnto that citie for the stedfast faith and tried loialtie at Eouen.] at all times found in the citizens there. 1 In Act III., sc. ii., Joan enters " with/oure Souldiers." She anawers the watchman's challenge with a few words spoken in French (1. 13). 226 IX. HENRY VI. PABT I. Bedford, who has been " brought in sicke in a Chayre " (1. 40), determines to "sit before the Walls of Eoan" (1. 91), awaiting the issue of an attempt to regain the city, for he has " read " That stout Pendragon, in his Litter, sick, Came to the field, and vanquished his foes : Me thinkes I should reuiue the Souldiers hearts Because I euer found them as my selfe. — 11. 95-98. Geoffrey of Monmouth (VIII. xxii. 154, &o.) attributes this heroic deed to TJter Pendragon, but Boece's version (152/49 b, &c.) of the story — which Holinshed followed — is that Pendragon's brother, Aurelius Ambrosius, d^oi?r" [Sol. ii. H. S. 99/1/67.] euen sicJee as he was, caused himselfe ea?riefsiok to bc caried forth in a Utter; with whose presence his people were tattle.]'' " so incouraged, that, incountring with the Saxons, they wan thQ victorie, . . . Act III. sc. iii. — ^In August, 1435, representatives of England and Prance met at Arras to discuss terms of peace. When this negotiation failed, Burgundy, whose attachment to his English allies had long been cooling, abandoned their cause, and soon afterwards turned his arms against them.i September 21, 1435, is the date ^ of the instrument by which he made peace with Charles VII. Joan — who is the dramatic agent of their reconciliation — died on May 30, 1431. ^ Joan proposes inducing Burgundy to forsake Talbot (11. 17-20). Charles answers (11. 21-24) : I, marry. Sweeting, if we could doe that. Prance were no place for Henryes Warriors ; Nor should that Nation boast it so with vs, But be extirped from our Prouinces. Alenfon adds : For euer should they be expuls'd from France, . . . Perhaps these lines echo part of a speech which Halle — translating Polydore Vergil (485/16-24) — ^makes Charles address — ^in or about 1435 — to Burgundy, whom the King complimented by saying that now there could be no question S^'^Jheip [Salle, 177.] hit by your helpe and aide, we shall expell, cleane shLfbf"''' pull vp hy the notes, and put out, all the Englyshe nacion, out of S " our realmes, territories, and dominions. Fiance.] Joan's appeal to Burgundy's patriotism shakes him, and he yields when she uses the following argument as a proof that the English paid no regard to his interests (11. 69-73). 1 He besieged Calais in 1436.— -Mms., vi. 285-310. " Mons., VI. 221. ' See p. 224 above. IX. HENfiY VI. PART I. 227 Was not the Duke of Orleance thy Foe? And was he not in England Prisoner t But, when they heard he was thine Enemie, They set him free without his Eansome pay'd, In spight of Burgonie and all his friends. My next excerpt shows that these lines are at variance with historic facts: [Hoi. iii. 6I8/2/11. Halle, 192.] Philip, duke of Burgognie, partlie mooued in conscience to make amends to Charles duke of Orleance (as yet prisoner in England) for the death of duke Lewes [Burgundy his father, whome duke lohn, father to this duke Philip, cruellie Sse*° murthered in the citie of Paris ; and partlie intending the aduance- t">m. ° captivity.] ment of his neece, the ladie Marie, daughter to Adolfe duke of Cleue, (by the which aliance, he trusted, that all old rancor should ceasse,) contriued waies to haue the said duke of Orleance set at libertie, vpon promise by him made to take the said ladie Marie vnto wife. This duke had beene prisoner in England euer since [Orleans had the battell was fought at Agincourt, vpon the dale of Crispine and ^\a Crispinian, in the yeare 1415, and was set now at libertie in the ^^"'^ moneth of Nouember, in the yeare 1440;^ paieng for his ransome foure hundred thousand crownes, though other saie but three hundred thousand. The cause whie he was deteined so long in captiuitie, was to (He wa» ° '^ detained pleasure thereby the duke of Burgognie : for, so long as the duke b^^*"^!- ] of Burgognie continued faithfiill to the king of England, it was not thought necessarie to suffer the duke of Orleance to be ransomed, least vpon his deliuerance he would not ceasse to seeke meanes to be reuenged vpon the duke of Burgognie, for the old grudge and displeasure betwixt their two families ; and therefore such ransome was demanded for him as he was neuer able to pay. But, after the [To punish Burgundy duke of Burgognie had broken his promise, and was turned to the forhis French part, the councell of the king of England deuised how to pro^gf^'* deliuer the duke of Orleance, that thereby they might displeasure ^^n^so the duke of Buigognie.^ Which thing the duke of Burgognie per- p^^ * Orleans was released from custody on October 28, 1440, at "Westminster. —Bymer, x. 823. He was out of England (ep. 1 Men. VI., III. iii. 70) on November 12, Um—Ibid., 829. * MaUe, 194. I know not Salle's authority for attributing this design to 228 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. Orleans's ransom,] lohn lord Talbot created earle of Shrews- burie. [Names of those present when Henry was crowned at Paris.] King_ Hertrie th£ 8ixt crowned in Paris. ceiuing, doubted what might follow if he were deliuered without his knowledge, and therefore to his great cost practised his deliuer- ance, paid his ransome, and ioined with him amitie and aliance by mariage of his neece. Act III. so. iv. — Talbot presents himself before his sovereign, who rewards his services by creating him Earl of Shrewsbury (11. 25, 26). The new Earl is bidden to Henry's coronation (1. 27), though that ceremony took place in 1431, and Talbot's advancement — ^recorded in the passage quoted below — is placed by Holinshed among the events of 1442. \Hol. iii. 623/2/9. Halle, 202.] About this season, lohn, the valiant lord Talbot, for his approued prowesse and wisdome, aswell in England as in France, both in peace & warre so well tried, was created earle of Shrewesburie ; ^ and with a companie of three thousand men sent againe into Normandie, for the better defense of the same. Act lY. sc. i. — " Enter King, Glocester, Winchester, Yorke, Suffolke, Somerset, Warwicke, Talbot, Exeter, and Gouernor of Paris." 2 This entry should be compared with the list given by Holinshed of those present at Henry's coronation in Paris.^ \Hol. iii. 6O6/1/20. Halle, 160.] There were in his companie of his owne nation, his vncle the cardinall of Winchester, the cardinall and archbishop of Yorke, the dukes of Bedford, Yorke, and Norffolke, the carles of Warwike, Salisburie, Oxenford, Huntington, Ormond, Mortaigne, and Suffolke. [Hoi. iii. 6O6/1/44. Halle, 161. J he was crowned king of France, in our ladie church of Paris, by the cardinall of Winchester : the bishop of Paris not being contented that the cardinall should doo such an high ceremonie in his church and iurisdiction. the Council. Burgundy did not discharge Orleans's ransom, but merely authorized the Duchess of Burgundy to make herself responsible for the pay- ment of 30,000 crowns, — which formed part of the ransom, — if the Dauphin Lewis failed to become Orleans's pledge for the acquittance of that amount. — Bymer, x. 788. 1 On May 20, IU2.— Charter-roll, 1-20 H. VI. (0. B.). 2 Exeter, and Gouefrnor of Parisi] and Oouemor Exeter. Fi. 3 Gloucester was in England when Henry was crowned at Paris. He was appointed Lieutenant of England during the King's absence from the realm. — Froe. Priv. Co., iv. 40. " Somerset " was Edmund Beaufort, then Earl of Mortain. Talbot was a prisoner of war in 1431 (see pp. 213, 214 above). Thomas Beaufort, Duke of Exeter, died about five years before Henry's corona- tion at Paris (see p. 235 below). The French Governor of Paris (11. 3-8) is a fictitious personage. IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 229 Opinion was converted into very vigorous action when Talbot tore the Garter from the leg of " Falstaffe " (so spelt in the entry, 1. 8). Holinshed merely says that, " for doubt of misdealing " at the battle of Patay (see pp. 207, 208 above), Bedford took from Sir John Pastolfe [Rol. iii. 6OI/2/50. Ralle, 150.] the image of saint George, [.^t^^a'to'' and his garter; though afterward, by meanes of freends, and *'^*°if''i apparant causes of good excuse, the same were to him againe deliuered against the mind of the lord Talbot.^ Falstaffe had brought with him a letter from Burgundy ; " plaine and bluntly " addressed " To the King," whom the Duke does not call " his Soueraigne" (11. 51, 52). Gloucester reads the letter, which runs thus (11. 55-60) : I haue, vpon especiall cause, Mou'd with compassion of my Countries wracke. Together with the pittifuU complaints Of such as your oppression feedes vpon. Forsaken your pernitious Faction, And ioyn'd with Charles, the rightful! king of France. Having made peace with Charles, [Eol. iii. 6II/2/SS. Halle, 177.] the duke of Burgognie, to £J™«°°/°' set a veile before the king of Englands eies, sent Thoison Dore his ^^7* cheefe herald to king Henrie with letters ; excusing the matter by ITi^d^s way of information, that he was constreined to enter in this league ma^ ™ with K. Charles, by the dailie outcries, complaints, and lamenta- ch»ries.] tions of his people, alledging against him that he was the onlie cause of the long continuance of the wars, to the vtter impouerish- ing of his owne people, and the whole nation of France. . . . . . . Thesuperscriptionofthisletter was thus: 'Tb^Ae high and [ihesuper- ■^ * , Bcnption of " mightie prince, Henrie, by the grace of God, king of England, his ^^ ''""•' " welbeloued cousine." Neither naming him king of France, nor his souereigne lord, according as (euer before that time) he was accus- tomed to doo. This letter was much maruelled at of the councell, after they had throughlie considered all the contents thereof, & they could not but be much disquieted ; so far foorth that diuerse ingeTof *"'* of them stomaked so muche the vntruth^ of the duke, that cSn.] they could not temper their passions, but openlie called him traitor. 1 The restoration of the Garter to Fastolfe caused "grand d^bat" between him and Talbot, after the latter's release from captivity in 1433. — Mans., v. 230. 2 them stomaked so nmche the vntruth] Hoi. ed. 1. them offended so much tvith the imtruth Hoi. ed. 2. 230 IX. HENEY VI. PAET I. When the letter has been read, Henry bids Talbot march against Burgundy " straight," and make him feel " what offence it is to flout his Friends " (1. 75). Toison d'Or was sent back to his master with the verbal message that, " what a new reconciled enimie was in respect of an old tried freend," Burgundy " might shortlie find" {Eol. iii. 6I2/1/30). After playing the part of umpire in the strife of the Eoses, Henry says (11. 162-168): Cosin of Yorke, we institute your Grace To be our Regent in these parts of France : And, good my Lord of Somerset, vnite Your Troopes of horsemen with his Bands of f oote ; Go cheerefully together, and digest Your angry OhoUer on your Enemies. There is some historical warrant for this speech. In 1443, John Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, received military commands in France and Guienne, without prejudice to the authority of York, who was then Lieutenant-General and Governor of France and Normandy. An invasion of Normandy by the French was apprehended, and York was desired to assist Somerset. ^ I give excerpts wherein mention is made of a joint campaign conducted by York and Somerset ; premising that the date (20th of Henry VI.) is too early, and that Halle — ^whom Holinshed followed — wrongly attributed to Edmund Beaufort (the dramatic " Somerset ") operations which were carried out by Edmund's brother, John Beaufort. [Invasion of \H.ol. iii. 619/1/2. SolU, 194] In the beginning of this Ai^ou by ^ ■ somCTMti t^sntith [xix. — E.all6\ yeare, Richard duke of Yorke, regent of France, and gouemour of Normandie, determined to inuade the territories of his enimies both by sundrie armies, and in seuerall places, and therevpon without delaie of time he sent the lord of Willoughbie with a great crue of soldiers to destroie the countrie of Amiens ; and lohn lord, Talbot was appointed to besiege the towne of Diepe; and the regent himselfe, accompanied with Edmund duke of Summerset, set forward into the duchie of Aniou. . . . [Anjouand The dukcs of Yorke and Summerset . . . entered into Aniou Maine Yo^lnd'^ and Maine, and there destroied townes, and spoiled the people, and Somerset] ^jtij grgat prclcs and prisoners repaired agaiue into Normandie, . . . Act IV. sec. ii.-vii. — Since the historical time of the last scene ranges from 1431 to 1443, it is impossible to determine the historic ' Frm. Priv. Co., v. 255 ; 259-261. Cp. Cont. Croyl, 519. IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 231 interval between sc. i., Act IV., and the scenes in which Talbot's expedition to Guienne is dramatized. The dramatic interval being of uncertain length, an audience might suppose that, after chastising Burgundy, as the King bade (see p. 230 above), Talbot rashly undertook to widen the circle of English conquest by the reduction of Bordeaux. But Bordeaux had belonged to us for nearly three centuries before it was annexed by the Erench in 1451.1 The leaders of an English party asked us to return, and, their offer having been accepted, Talbot was sent to win back Guienne. Bordeaux opened its gates to him : the larger portion of the Bordelois was speedily recovered, together with Castillon in Perigord.^ Talbot was at Bordeaux when he heard that a French army was besieging Castillon, and on July 17, 1453, he brought relief to the garrison.* At his approach, the French [Sol. iii. 640/2/46. Halle, 229.] left the siege, and retired in good order into the place which they had trenched, diched, and fortified with ordinance. The earle, aduertised how the siege was remoued, hasted forward towards his enimies, doubting most least they would haue beene quite fled and gone before his comming. But they, fearing the displeasure of the French king (who was not far ofi) if they should haue fled, abode the earles comming, and so The valiant receiued him : who though he first with manful! courage, and sore f^""*,"^ fighting wan the entrie of their campe, yet at length they com- XS"" passed him about, and shooting him through the thigh with an handgun, slue his horsse, and finallie killed him lieng on the ground ; whome they durst neuer looke in the face, while he stood on his feet. Scenes ii.-iv. are imaginary. The story of young Talbot's devotion to his father — dramatized in scenes v., vi. — is thus related : [ffol. iii. 640/2/61. Halle, 229.] It was said, that after he perceiued there was no remedie, but present losse of the battel], he counselled his sonne, the lord Lisle, to sane himselfe by flight, sith the same could not redound to anie great reproch in him, this being the first iournie in which he had beene present. Manie words he Tsed to persuade him to haue saued his life ; but nature J™^°*^a so wrought in the son, that neither deske of life, nor feare of hSi.t'*"^ 1 A campaign which lasted about three months closed with the surrender of Bayonne to the French in August, 1451.— Dit Glercq, xiL 89, 112. 2 D« aercq, xiii. 5-7. De Coussy, xi. 2, 3. „. ,, , .., 3 This date is confirmed by a letter written two days alter the battle. — BibliotMque de VJ^cole des Chartes, 2nd series, vol. iii. pp. 246, 247. 232 [Talbot advised his son to flee.] A worthy aaieing of a wise prince. IX. HENRY VI. PART I. death, could either cause him to shrinke, or conueie himselfe out of the danger, and so there manfuUie ended his life with his said father. A few lines of old Talbot's appeal to his son (Act IV., sec. v., vi.) have parallels in a speech attributed to the former by Halle (229). Thou neuer hadst Eenowne, nor canst not lose it (v. 40). And leaue my followers here to fight and dye ? My Age was neuer tainted with such shame (v. 45, 46). Flye, to reuenge my death, if I he slaine (v. 18). My Deaths Eeuenge, thy Youth, and Englands Fame : All these are sau'd, if thou wilt flye away (vi. 39, 41). In the quasi-historical speech, Talbot urges that he — " the terror and scourge of the French people " (cp. p. 218 above) — cannot die " without great laude," or flee " without perpetuall shame " ; and he then thus counsels his son ; "But because this is thy first iourney and enterprise, neither "thi flyeng shall redounde to thy shame, nor thy death to thy "glory ; for as hardy a man wisely flieth as a temerarious person " folishely abidethe : therfore y° fleyng of me shalbe y* dishonor "not only of me & my progewie, but also a discomfiture of all my ''company; thy departure shal saue thy lyfe, and make the able "another tyme, if I he slayn, to reuenge my death, and to do honor "to thy Prince and profjt to his Realme." Dunois would hew to pieces the bodies, and hack asunder the bones, of Talbot and young John (vii. 47). Charles's dissent from this savage proposal, Oh, no, forbeare ! For that which we haue fled During the life, let vs not wrong it dead, resembles an answer made by Lewis XI. to " oerteine vndiscreet persons " who advised the defacement of Bedford's tomb at Rouen. [Hoi. iii. 6I2/1/S4. Halle, 178.] "What honour shall it be to "vs, or to you, to breake this monument, and to pull out of the "ground the dead bones of him, whome in his life neither my "father nor your progenitours, with all their power, puissance, and " freends were once able to make flee one foot backward ; but by "his strength, wit, and policie, kept them all out of the principall IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 233 "dominions of the realme of France, and out of this noble and " famous duchie of Normandie 1 Wherefore I saie, first, God haue "his soule ! and let his bodie now lie in rest ; which, when he was "aliue, would haue disquieted the proudest of vs all." The " silly stately stile " — as Joan calls it — of Talbot's dignities, enumerated by Sir William Lucy when asking for " the great Alcides of the field," agrees almost literally with an epitaph on Talbot in Bichard Crompton's Momsion of Magnamvmitie, 1599, sign, E 4.^ I give the epitaph and 11. 60-71 in parallel columns. Here lieth the right noble knight, But where's the great Alcides of the 60 jmaipUon lohn Talbott Earh of Shrewshwry, VaUant Lord r»»o^ .^aW« ./ ^W«. Tfl^nXt Washford, Waterford, amd Valence, bury? SArcwrttt™ Lord Talbot of Good^ige, and ^""^^^ ^°'' ^^ '^''^ '""""'"^ ^° Vrchengfield, Lord Stramge of the Great Earle of Washford, Waterfiyrd, hlacke Meere, Lord Verdon of . *^/f/?'''' ^ . ^ rr . • «. ' „ ,. TTT- Zord lalbot of Goodrtg and Vrmin- 64 Alton, Lord Crumwell of Wing- field, feld. Lord Louetoft of Worsop, ■^o'"'' Stramge of Blmkmere, Lord Lord FvjrniuaU of Sheffield, Lord Lot^ Cromwell of Wingefieid, Lord FaMlconbri[d'}ge, knight of the most Furniuallof Sheffeild, 17 J j: ct n a -nr- i 77 The thrice victorious Lord of Falcon- noble order oj S. George, S. MichaeU, iridqe ■ and the Golden fleece, Great Ma/r- Knight of the Noble Order of S. 68 shzll to king ffewy the sixt of his ^^^^^^ '^ ^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^^^^ realme of France : who died in the Fleece ; battell of Burdeaux in the yeare Great Ma,rshall to Henry the si^ T 1 -licrn Q/^ all fcs Warres Within the iJeaime oi our Lord 1453. „/ Frarmi 1 In his Catalogtie. and Succession of the Kings, Princes, Dukes, Mourquesses, Earles, and Viscmmts of this Realme of England, ed. 1619, p. 196, Balph Brooke says of Talbot : " This lohn being slaine ... his body was buried in a Toombe at Roane in Normandy, whereon this Epitaphe is written." The epitaph which these words preface is the same as that given by Crompton ; with three slight exceptions. After " Earle of Shrewsbury " Brooke has "Marie of Weshford, Waterford and Valence." Brooke also omits "the" before " Blakmere," and " most " before " Noble Order of S. George." From Leland {Itinerary, ed. Heame, 1744, vol. iv., pt. 1, p. 23, fol. 40) we learn the follow- ing particulars concerning the first interment of Talbot's body, and its sub- sequent removal to England : " This John [3rd Earl of Shrewsbury] had emong his Brethern one cauUid Gilbert Talbot, after a Knight of Fame, the which buried the Erie his Grandfathers Bones browght out of Fraunce at Whitechirche in a fair Chapelle, wher he is also buried hymself." Leland adds {Itin., vol. vii., pt. 1, p. 8, fol. 15): " Talbot Erie of Shrobbesbyri and his Sonne Lord Lisle slayne in Fraunce. This Erles Bones were browght out of Nor- mandy to Whitchurche in Shrobbeshire." On April 9, 1874, the bones of Talbot were discovered by some workmen engaged in repairing his monument at Whitchurch. These remains were solemnly re-interred on April 17, 1874. — Notes dk Queries, 5th S. I. 399 ; cp. 258. Crompton is the earliest known authority for the epitaph I have quoted in my text. He cites in a preceding 234 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. [The Emperor and other Chrifitiaii Princes desired mediation between England and France.] {The Cardinal's exhortation to' peace."] Act V. sc. i. — Letters have arrived from the Pope (Eugenius IV.) and the Emperor (Sigismund), whereby Henry is entreated (11. 5, 6) : To haue » godly peace concluded of Betweene the Eealmes of England and of France. In 1435, during the session of the Council of Basle, \Hol. iii. 6II/1/7. Halle, 174] motion was made among Sigis- mmid the emperour and other christen kings . . . that, sith such horror of bloudshed betweene the two nations continuallie so lament- ablie raged in France, some mediation might be made for accord : . . . The impiety of war between " Professors of one Faith" (L 14) is ex- pressed in a speech which forms my next quotation ; and this speech also contains the words " a godlie peace," occurring in the lines quoted above. The English, French, and Burgundian plenipotentiaries having met at Arras in August, 1435,^ " the cardinall of S. Crosse," who represented Eugenius IV., [Hoi. iii. 6II/1/40. Halle, 175.] declared to the three parties the innumerable mischeefes, that had followed to the whole stata of the christian common-wealth by their continuall dissention and dailie discord ; exhorting them, for the honour of God, & for the loue which they ought to beare towards the aduancement of his faith and true religion, to conforme themselues to reason, and to laie aside all rancor, malice and displeasure ; so that, in concluding a godlie peace, they might receiue profit and quietnesse heere in this world, and of God an euerlasting reward in heauen. Gloucester informs Henry that, "the sooner to effect and surer binde " a peace between England and France, the Earl of Armagnac Proffers his onely daughter to your Grace In marriage, with a large and sumptuous Dowrie. — 11. 19, 20. The proffer here announced was made in 1442,^ — not 1435, our last marginal note " Camden 462." The reference shows that he used the ed. of Camden's Britwrmia which was published in 1594, because no previous ed. contains any mention of Talbot at p. 462, and the next ed. did not appear till 1600. But at p. 462 of the ed. of 1594 Camden merely notices Talbot's tomb at Whitchurch, and does not even quote another epitaph on Talbot once exist- ing at Whitchurch, and having much less resemblance to the lines in 1 Henry VI. thaa is displayed by the Rouen inscription. 1 Mons., vi. 178. Mons. says (vi. 161) : " de par notre Saint-Pfere le pape, le cardinal de Saint-Croix." 2 On May 28, 1442, Robert Roos, Knight, Master Thomas Bekyngton, and Edward HuU, Gentleman, were empowered to choose one of the daughters of the Count of Armagnac, and espouse her to Henry. — Bymer, xi. 7. Bekyngton and the other ambassadors embarked at Plymouth on July 10, 1442. — Beck- ington's Embassy, 10. He returned in the following year; landing at Falmouth on February 10, 1443. — BecMngton's Embassy, 89. IX. HENRY VL PART I. 235 historical date, — and John Count of Armagnac had, as the following excerpt shows, a very different motive for desiring an alliance with Henry.i [Sol. iii. 623/2/S7. Kalle, 202.] In this yeare ^ died in Guien the countesse of Comings, to whome the French king and also the earle of Arminacke pretended to he heire, in so much that the earle entred into all the lands of the said ladie. And bicause he knew the French king would not take the matter well, to haue a Rouland for an Oliuer he sent solemne ambassadours to the king tjhe Eaii of o Armagnac of England, oflFering him his daughter in mariage, with promise to a^oguto in be bound (beside great summes of monie, which he would giue HeS^vrith with hir) to deliuer into the king of Englands hands all such dower, and contingent castels and townes, as he or his ancestors deteined from him advantages.] within anie part of the duchie of Aquitaine, either by conquest of his progenitors, or by gift and deliuerie of anie French king ; and further to aid the same king with monie for the recouerie of other cities, within the same duchie, from the French king ; or from anie other person that against king Henrie [p. 624] vniustlie kept, and wrongfiillie withheld ^ them. This offer seemed so profitable and also honorable to king Henrie and the realme, that the ambassadours were well heard, honourablie receiued, and with rewards sent home into their countrie. After whome were sent, for the conclusion of the ^^^tf marriage, into Guien, sir Edward Hull, sir Eobert Eos, and lohn ^f^„ Grafton,* deane of S. Seuerines ; the which (as all the chronographers ^■^^Btmrie. agree) both concluded the mariage, and by proxie affled the yoong ladie. Though Winchester was a Cardinal when sc. iii.. Act I., was before the audience, Exeter is surprised at finding him " install'd " in that dignity, and recollects a prophecy of Henry V. about the Bishop (11. 32, 33) : If once he come to be a Cardinall, Hee'l make his cap coequaU with the Crowne. Exeter died in 1426 {Hoi iii. 595/2/73), t>^t Winchester was not made a Cardinal until 1427.^ " Whyche degree," says Halle (139), 1 But what HalU says about Armagnac's proffer is inaccurate See Bech- ington's Embassy, pp. xxxvii-xli. 2 The Countess of Oominges died in 1443.— jirweZme, ii. 637. 3 withheld] withholden Hoi. * G^a/tonJ Halle. OraUon Hoi. 5 He received his hat on March 26, 14:21 .—Chron. Lmd., 115. 236 IX. HENRY VI. PART I. [Henry V. Kynge Henry the fifth, knowynge the haute corage, and the miffer "° ambicious mynde of the man [Winchester], prohibited hym on hys hats to be allegeaunce once either to sue for or to take i meanynge that p™<»sm Cardinalles Hattes shoulde not presume to bee egall with Princes.^ Holinshed copied from Halle a second series of articles containing charges against Winchester, which were preferred by Gloucester in 1440.^ The first article was ; ^m& i^°^- "^- 620/1/62. Ealle, 197.] 2 First, the cardinal!, then wnchester being bishop of Winchester, tooke Tpon him the state of cardinall, ca^S,i!]°' which was naied and denaied him by the king of most noble memorie, my lord your father (whome God assoile) ; saieng that he had as leefe set his crowne beside him, as see him weare a cardinals hat, he being a cardinall. For he knew full well, the pride and ambition that was in his person, then being but a bishop, should haue so greatlie extolled him into more intollerable pride, when that he were a cardinall : . . . There is, I believe, no authority for representing Winchester as having obtained a cardinalate by bribing the Pope (11. 51-54) ; but perhaps the Bishop's subsequent wealth led to the inference that a large sum must have been asked for the Theuowpof [Hol. m. 696/2/r. Halle, 139.] habit, hat, and dignitie of a made a cardinall, with all ceremonies to it apperteininar : which promotion, V- ^- the late K. (right deeplie persing into the vnrestrainable ambitious mind of the man, that euenfrom his youth was euer [wont] to checke at the highest ; and [having] also right well ascerteined with what intollerable pride his head should soone be swollen vnder such a hat) did therefore all his life long keepe this prelat backe from that presumptuous estate. But now, the king being yoong and the regent his freend, he obteined his purpose, to his great profit, and [Winchester the impouerfshing of the spiritualtie of this realme. For by a bull treasure by legatinc ^, which he purchased fi-om Rome, he gathered so much legatine.] trcasurc, that no man in maner had monie but he : so that he was called the rich cardinall of Winchester. Act V. sc. ii. — Charles has heard that " the stout Parisians do 1 Henry " would not that Cardinals hats shoulde in anye wise presume to bee egwoZf wiih, regall crownes." — S.ol. ed. I. 2 Arnold, (279-286) contains the earliest printed text of these articles. ' legatine] legcmtine Hol. IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 237 reuoU " (1. 2) ; and Alengon thereupon advises a march to Paris. Paris was lost by the English before the play began (I. i. 61), but the Fourth Act opened with Henry's coronation there. A sentence which concludes Holinshed's account of the loss of the city in 1436 may be compared with Charles's words. [Eol. iii. 6I3/1/73. Salle, 180.] Thus was the citie of Paris S?,,-^, brought into possession of Charles the French king,i through the 5?^^ the vntrue demeanour of the citizens, who, contrarie to their oths, and ^"^'^'^^ promised allegiance, like false and inconstant people, so reuolted from the English. Act V. sc. iii. — The action of this scene passes in Anjou (1. 147), near the "Castle walles" of Ren^ (1. 129), assumed by editors to be those girdling Angers. May 23, 1430, is the historic date of Joan's capture. On that day she accompanied a sally from Compi6gne, — then besieged by the English and Burgundians, — and was taken before she could re-enter the town.^ Bedford was " Eegent " (1. 1) at the time, but the dramatist killed him in Act III. sc. ii. York — whose prisoner she becomes in this scene — held no such post \mtil 1436, when he received the chief command in France. ^ Suffolk's proxy-wooing of Margaret (11. 45-186) is, of course, fictitious, but he arranged the marriage between her and Henry. In 1444, [Rol. iii 624/i/6i. Ralle, 203.] England was vnquieted, . . . and France by spoile, slaughter, and burning sore defaced ; (a mischeefe in all places much lamented;) therefore, to agree the two puissant kings, all the princes of christendome trauelled so j^^,„,„j eflfectuouslie by their oratours and ambassadours, that a diet was ap- ^'iTtt pointed to be kept at the citie of Tours in Touraine ; where for the XiS""' king of England appeared William de la Poole earle of Suffolke, . and France. 1 On April 13, 1436.— Jowrma?, xv. 471. ^ In a letter to Henry VI., the Duke of Burgundy announces her capture on May 23. — Chron. Land., 170. 3 In the address of a letter from Henry, dated on May 12 (1436, wrongly placed under 1433), York is styled " oure lieutenant of cure reume of France and duchie of Normandie." — Stevenson, II., part 1, Ixxiii. In this letter York is urged to assume his government without longer delay. The issue roll (cited in Eamsay's York and Lancaster, i. 484, note 5) shows that he must have sailed soon after May 24, 1436. On April 7, 1437, the indentures, by which York agreed to undertake the lieutenancy of France and Normandy, had nearly expired, but he was asked to remain at his post until a successor should be appointed. — Proc. Priv. Co., v. 6, 7. The appointment of his successor, Kichard Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, is dated July 16, 1437. — Rymer, x. 674. War- wick died in office on April 30, 1439 {Ohron. Land., 124); and, on July 2, 1440, York was made Lieutenant-General and Governor of France, Normandy, &c., for a term of five years ending at Michaelmas, 1445. — Bymer, x. 736. 238 IX, HENRY VI. . PART I. railing to agree upon the terms of a peace, the commissioners negotiated a truce. [Eol. iii. 624/2/18. Ealle, 203.] In treating of this truce, the earle of Suffolke, aduenturing somewhat vpon his commission, with- out the assent of his associats, imagined that the next waie to M^ged a come to a perfect peace was to contriue a mariage betweene the tetoeaf French kings kinsewoman,^ the ladie Margaret, daughter to Reiner andS^liTy.] dukc of Aniou, and his souereigne lord king Henrie. Act V. sc. iv. — Entering fully into the spirit of the following passages, the dramatist was not satisfied to avail himself of the worst charges which they contain, but taxed his invention to make Joan deny her father (11. 2-33). About five months after her capture, she was delivered to the English,^ and [Eol. iii. 6O4/2/23.] for hir pranks so vncouth and suspicious, the lord regent, by Peter Chauchon bishop of Beauuois, (in whose diocesse she was taken,) caused hir life and beleefe, after order of tjom law, to be inquired vpon and examined. Wherein found though a found guilty virgin, yet first, shamefullie reiecting hir sex abominablie in acts craft, and and apparcU, to haue counterfeit mankind, and then, all damnablie condemned x i. ' » / impriMn-"*' faithlcssc, to bc a pernicious instrument to hostilitie and bloudshed ment] j^ diuclish witchcraft and sorcerie,* sentence accordinglie was pro- nounced against hir. Howbeit, vpon humble confession of hir iniquities with a counterfeit contrition pretending a carefull sorow for the same, execution spared and all mollified into this, that from thencefoorth she should cast oflF hir vnnaturall wearing of mans abilliments, and keepe hir to garments of hir owne kind, abiure hir pernicious practises of sorcerie and witcherie, and haue life and leasure in perpetuall prison to bewaile hir misdeeds. Which to performe (according to the maner of abiuration) a solemne oth verie gladlie she tooke. But herein (God helpe vs! ) she fuUie afore possest of the feend, 1 Niece to Mary of Anjou, Queen of France, who was Rent's sister. ^ Proeis (Dissertation), ix. 217, n 1. 3 In 1434, Bedford, defending Ms conduct as Regent of Prance, said that the loss of territory, which hefel the English after Salisbury was slain at the siege of Orleans, was " causedde in greete partye as I trowe of lak of sadrfe be leve and of unlieful doubte Jiat bei hadde of a disciple and leme of J)« fende caVLeAde ]>' Pucelle Jjat usedcJe fals enchantementes and sorcerie." — Proe, Priv. Co., iv. 223. IX. HENRY VI. PART I. 239 not able to hold her in anie towardnesse of grace, falling streight Poiydo. 23, waie into hir former abominations, (and yet seeking to eetch out [Haying life as long as she might,) stake not (though the shift were shame- sou|m to° * J. 1|, „ 1 . To 1 prolong life tull; to coniesse hir selfe a strumpet, and (vnmaried as she was) to ^^rf^f t^^ be with child.^ For triall, the lord regents lenitie gaue hir nine ^^'''''i^i moneths stale, at the end wherof she (found herein as false as wicked in the rest, an eight dales after, vpon a further definitiue sentence declared against hir to be relapse and a renouncer of hir oth and repentance) was therevpon^ deliuered ouer to secular ^^ite^sJe power, and so executed by consumption of fire in the old market S^e'ST'*"* place at Rone, in the selfe same steed where now saint Michaels cXT^ church stands : hir ashes afterward without the towne wals shaken into the wind. Now recounting altogither, hir pastorall bringing vp, rude, without any vertuous instruction, hir campestrall conuersation ^" emndes with wicked spirits,* whome, in hir first salutation to Charles the Dol- "»"• phin, she vttered to be our Ladie, saint Katharine, and saint Anne, spirits gave that m this behalfe came and gaue hir commandements from "an^s y^'* ^ sne kept her God hir maker, as she kept hir fathers lambs in the fields * . . . ^^^^.1 [p. 605, col. l.J These matters may verie rightfuUie denounce Tnto all the world hir execrable abhominations, and well iustifie the iudgement she had, and the execution she was put to for the same. A thing yet (God wot) verie smallie shadowed and lesse K«^ holpen by the verie trauell of the Dolphin, whose dignitie abroad ^'S him- [was] foulie spotted in this point, that, contrarie to the holie degree soroenesj of a right christen prince (as he called himselfe), for maintenance of his quarels in warre would not reuerence to prophane his sacred estate, as dealing in diuelish practises with misbeleeuers and witches. When Joan has been led out to execution, Winchester enters and greets York (1. 95) 1 This lie •was the source of 1 Hen. VI., V. iv. 60-85. 2 was therevpon] was she therevpon Hoi. 3 This sentence may have given the dramatist a hint for V. iii. 1-23, where his Joan entreats the help of certain " Fiends,' ' whom she has summoned. 4 Cp. I. ii. 76, &c. : " Loe, whilest I wayted on my tender Lambes, . . . Gods Mother deigned to appeare to me, And, in a Vision full of Maiestie, Will'd me to leaue my base Vocation, And free my Countrey from Calamitie." Christian- istimm rex. 240 IX. HENRY VI. PAET L With Letters of Commission from the King ; which embody those "conditions of a friendly peace" between England and Erance, drawn up by Henry's order (v. i. 37-40), in response to an appeal from " the States of Christendome " (V. iv. 96-99). Charles then enters, accompanied by his lords, and says (11. 116-119) : Since, Lords of England, it is thus agreed That peacef ull truce shall be proclaim'd in France, We come to be informed by your selues. What the conditions of that league must be. Winchester answers (11. 123-132) : Charles, and the rest, it is enacted thus : That, in regard King Henry giues consent, 124 Of meere compassion and of lenity, To ease your Countrie of distressefull Warre, And suffer you to breath in fruitfuU peace, You shall become true Liegemen to his Crowne : 128 And, Charles, vpon condition thou wilt sweare To pay him tribute, and submit thy selfe. Thou shaltbe plac'd as Viceroy vnder him. And still enioy thy Regall dignity. 132 The terms of peace here announced were, according to Halle, Holinshed's authority, offered at the conference of Arras, in 1435. [The [Hoi. iii. 611/i/ss. Halle, 175.] The Englishmen would that terms.] king Charles should haue nothing but what it pleased the king of England, and that not as dutie, but as a benefit ^ by him of his [The French ™eere llberalltie giuen and distributed. The Frenchmen, on the ™^' ' other part, would that K. Charles should haue the kingdome franklie and freelie, and that the king of England should leaue the name, armes, and title of the king of France, and to be content with the dukedomes of Aquitaine and Normandie, and to forsake Paris, and all the townes which they possessed in France, betweene the riuers of Some and Loire ; being no parcell of the duchie of Normandie. To be breefe, the demands of all parts were betweene them so farre out of square, as hope of concord there was none at all. ' If " benefit " = heneficiMm, flef, the English terms were as extravagant as those dictated by Winchester to Charles (V. iv. 124-132). But M by reason of the exceedmg houshold which he dailie j^jJJ^''" kept in all countries where euer he soioumed or laie : and when *"*• he came to London, he held such an house, that six oxen were eaten at a breakefast, and enerie tauerne was fiill of his meat, for who that had anie acquaintance in that house, he should haue had as much sod and rost as he might carrie vpon a long dagger. . . . Addressing the Duke, Salisbury says (II. 194-198) : And, Brother Yorke, thy Acts in Ireland, In bringing them to ciuill Discipline, Haue made thee fear'd and honor'd of the people : 1 Richard Neville, bom on November 22, 1428 {Bows Bol., 57), was made Earl of Warwick in 1449 {Dugdale, i. 304/ 1). What the dramatic Warwick says touchiag his share in the French war (I. i. 119, 120 ; iii. 176, 177) shows that — so far as these allusions apply — he is for a moment confounded with Kichard Beauchamp, who was appointed Lieutenant-Geueral and Governor of France, &o., on July 16, 1437 {Bymer, x. 674, 675) ; and died at Rouen on April 30, 1439 (Chron. Lortd., 124). But, despite this fleeting identification with Richard Beauchamp, we can hardly doubt that the " Warwicke" who takes Richard Plantagenet's part in the Temple Garden scene (1 Hen.' VI., II. iv.) is the same Warwick who is a character in the 2nd and 3rd Parts of Henry VI. ("Warwick's" assertion that he conquered Anjou and Maine is a dramatic embellishment). 2 Warwick's other virtues are recorded by Halle (231, 232) : " This Rycharde was not onely a man of maruelous qualities, and facundious facions, but also from his youth, by a certayn practise or natural! inclinacion, so set them forward, with witte and gentle demeanour, to all persones of high and of lowe degre, that emong all sortes of people he obteyned great loue, muche fauour, and more credence : which e tninges daily more increased by his abundant liberalitie and plentyfuU house kepynge, then by hys ryches, aucthoritie, or hygh parentage. By reason of whiche doynges he was in suche fauour and estimacion emongest the common people, that they iudged hym able to do all thinges, and that, without hym, nothing to be well done. For whiche causes his aucthoritie shortly so fast increased that whiche waie he bowed, that waye ranne the streame, and what part he auaunced, that syde gat the superioritie." 2ia X. HENRY VI. PART II. A rebellion in IrelaTid [appealed by York]. [The armourer's servant,] Salisbury, speaking in the historical year 1445, anticipates York's successful administration of Ireland in 1448-50.^ Afterwards (Act III., so. i., 11. 282-284) "a Poste" announces the rebellion which caused the goyeriunent of Ireland to be conferred on York. Holinshed records that, about the year 1448, [Hoi. iii. 629/2/26. Halle, 213.] began a new rebellion in Ireland ; but Richard duke of Yorke, being sent thither to appease the same, so asswaged the furie of the wild and sauage people there, that he wan him such fauour amongst them, as could neuer be separated from him and his linage ; which in the sequele of this historic may more plainelie appeare.^ Act I. so. ii. — We here find that Eleanor Cobham, Gloucester's second wife, looks forward to a day when she and her husband shall reign instead of Henry and Margaret. The historic Queen Margaret was not troubled by any ambitious hopes which the Duchess may hare cherished j for Eleanor Cobham did penance in November, 1441, and Margaret was, as we have seen, crowned on May 30, 1445. Act I. sc. iii. — The Queen enters with Suffolk. Peter, an " Armorers Man," presents a petition (11. 28, 30) against his " Master, Thomas Horner, for saying, That the Duke of Yorke was rightfuU Heire to the Crowne." Holinshed merely records that, in 1446, [Hoi. iii. 626/2/19.J a certeine armourer was appeached of treason by a seruant of his owne.* The petitioners having retired, Margaret tells Suffolk (11. 53-57) that, when he ran a tilt at Tours in honour of her love, — doubtless a reminiscence of those " iusts " which Holinshed says (iii. 625/1/30) were held to celebrate her proxy-marriage, — she thought her husband had resembled her champion. But all King Henry's mind is bent to Holinesse, To number Aue-Maries on his Beades ; His Champions are the Prophets and Apostles, His Weapons holy Sawes of sacred Writ, His Studie is his Tilt-yard, and his Loues Are brazen Images of Can6nized Saints. — 11. 58-63. 1 According to Halle (213), HoVs authority, York went to Ireland in the 27th year of Henry VI. (Sept. 1, 1448— Aug. 31, 1449). A warrant,— dated February 10, 1449, — for the payment of York's salary as Lieutenant in Ireland, shows that his ten years' term of office was to begin on September 29, 1447. — Stevenson, I. 487, 488. He returned to England in 1450. See p. 282 below. 2 See p. 282, n. 1, and p. 296 (below). 3 Stow (635) gives these particulars : " lohn Dauid [Davy] appeached Ms master William [John] Catur, an armorer dwelling in S. Dunstons parish in Fleetstreet, of treason." The year was 1447. Cp. Exchequer Issiies, 458, 459, The dramatic servant's name is Peter Thumpe ^2 Hen. VI., II. iii. 82-84). The surname of one of the sheriffs of the year (25 Hen, VI., 1446-47) was B-ome.— Fab., 618. X. HENRY VI. PART II. 249 Henry is thus described by Holinshed : [ffol. iii. 69I/1/69.J He was plaine, vpright, farre fi-om fraud, [Henry's ■ffholie giuen to praier, reading of scriptures, and almesdeeds ; . . , Halle (303) says : Kyng Henry was of stature goodly, of body slender, to which The damp- proporcion al other members wer correspondent : his face beautiful, Bmry the in y" which continually was resydent the bountie of mynde wyth [His boduy whych he was inwardly endued. He dyd abhorre of hys owne [HoUness.] nature al the vices, as wel of the body as of the soule ; and, from hys verye infancye, he was of honest conuersacion and pure integritie; no knower of euil, and a keper of all goodues; a dispiser of al thynges whych were wonte to cause the myndes of mortall menne ^o slyde, or appaire. Besyde thys, pacyence was so [Patience.] radicate in his harte that of all the iniuries to him commytted (which were no smal nombre) he neuer asked vengeaunce nor punishement, but for that rendered to almightie God, his creator, hartie thankes, thinking that by this trouble and aduersitie his sinnes wer to him forgotten and forgeuen. Henry and his Court enter, debating whether York or Somerset shall be appointed Regent of France ; a question which gives Margaret, and the four nobles who made an alliance in Act I., sc. i., an opportu- nity of attacking Gloucester. Cardinal Beaufort accuses him of having "rackf'the "Commons" (1. 131); and Somerset adds (11. 133, 134) that the Protector's " sumptuous Buildings" and " Wiues Attyre" Haue cost a masse of pubUque Treasurie. In 1446-47, according to Halle (208, 209), Gloucester's enemies perswaded, incensed, and exhorted the Queue, to loke wel vpon the expenses and reuenues of the realme, and thereof to call an accompt: afltanyng playnly that she should euidently perceiue that the Duke of Gloucester had not so muche aduanced & pre- f,^J°^ef Jf ferred the commonwealth and publique vtilitie as his awne priuate ^w?^^^"^ thiuges & peculiar estate. mmey. Buckingham thus assails Gloucester (11. 135, 136 ; op. III. i. 58, 59; 121-123): Thy Crueltie in execution Vpon Offenders hath exceeded Law, . . . Under- the same date (1446-47) we find that Gloucester was charged with this transgression. 250 X. HENRY VI. PART II. [Hol. iii. 627/1/4. Salle, 209.] Diuerse articles were laid The faint agaittst hiiti in open councell, and in especiall one : ^ That he guarell ^kaitotht had caused men, adiudged to die, to be put to other execution, CbUnS Oj eiocester. than the law of the land assigned. Suerlie the duke, verie well tiuegai learned in the law ciuill, detesting malefactors, and punishing crimSi^s!]'' oflFenses in seueritie of iustice, gat him hatred of such as feared condign reward ^ for their wicked dooings. Lastly, Margaret imputes to him (1. 138) the "sale of Offices and Townes in France." Perhaps Gloucester has been made to change places with Cardinal Beaufort, whom, in 1440, he accused of this misconduct. A long series of criminatory articles (referred to above, p. 236) were then exhibited by Gloucester against Beaufort. In the 22nd article Henry was asked [Sol. iii. 622/2/17. Salle, 201.] to consider the . . . lucre of the . . . cardinall, and the great deceipts that you be deceiued ' in by the labour of him & of the archbishop [of York, John Kempe], aswell in this your realme as in your realme of France and duchie of Normandie, where neither office, liuelode, nor capteine may be had, without too great good giuen vnto him ; wherby a great part of all the losse that is lost, they haue beene the causers of; for who that would giue most, his was the price, not considering the merits, seruice, nor sufficiance of persons. Making no reply to his adversaries, Gloucester withdraws a while, and, on his return, delivers his opinion in regard to the B.egency (11. 163, 164) : I say, my Soueraigne, Yorke is meetest mem To be your Regent in the Kealme of France. Suffolk — who had previously (I. iii. 36-39) sent for Horner — ^now seizes a chance of opposing Gloucester and thwarting York through the accusation of treason brought against the armourer. Holinshed copied from Halle (206) a passage which records that, in 1446, {Sol. iii. 625/2/29.] a parlement* was called, in the which it was especiallie concluded, that by good foresight Normandie might be so furnished for defense before the end of the truce, that the 1 in especiall one^ Halle, in especially one Hol. 2 In 2 Hen. Vl., III. i. 128-130, Gloucester says that he never gave 'condigne punishment' to any one, save a murderer or a highway robber. * deceiued] Halle, receiiied Hol. * This must have been the Parliament which began on February 25, 1445 (JBo<. Pa/rl., V. 66/1) ; and was sitting on June 4, 1445, and April 9, 1446 (see p. 241, n. 1, and p. 246, n. 1, above). [Cardinal Beaufort's sale of offices.] Anno Reg. 34. U46 X. HENRY VI. PART II. 251 French king should take no aduantage through want of timelie prouision : for it was knowne, that, if a peace were not concluded, the French king did prepare to imploie his whole puissance to The duke of make open warre. Heerevpon monie was granted, an armie Sl^^t leuied, and the duke of Summerset appointed to be regent of amdtheduti Normandie,^ and the duke of Yorke thereof discharged. dUcharged. From a chronicler ^ who wrote in. Henry VI. 's reign, Holinshed derived the information that Suffolk aided Somerset to obtain the Regency. [Rol. iii. 625/2/41.] I haue scene in a register booke belonging sometime to the abbeie of saint Albons, that the duke of York was established regent of France, after the deceasse of the duke of [y„,^ Bedford, to continue in that office for the tearme of fine yeares ; i^raMfor which being expired, he returned home, and was ioifuUie receiued ™ ^™"' of the king with thanks for his good seruice, as he had full well deserued in time of that his gouernement : and, further, that now, when a new regent was to be chosen and sent ouer, to abide vpon safegard of the countries beyond the seas as yet subiect to the English dominion, the said duke of Yorke was eftsoones (as a man ^heduixof most meet to supplie that roome) appointed to go ouer againe, as a^olnud to regent of France, with all his former allowances. But the duke of Summerset, still maligning the duke of Yorkes aduancement, as he had sought to hinder his dispatch at the first when he was sent ouer to be regent, (as before yee haue heard,*) he toC"*™*"* likewise now wrought so, that the king reuoked his grant made to ^^a^nt. the duke of Yorke for enioieng of that office the terme of other '"^^ud, fiue yeeres, and, with helpe of William marquesse of Suffolke, "t^^^iht p 1 . in 'mjarqyam of obtemed that grant for himseiie. sv^tooa. ^ On November 12, 1446, the government of France and Normandy was in commission, York being absent. — JReport on Foedera, App. D. 523. On November 11, 1447, he is styled Lieutenant-General and Governor of France and Normandy. — Ibid., 535. By December 20, 1447, Somerset had been appointed " to goo oure lieutenaunt into oure duohie of Normandie." — Stevenson, I. 477, 478. On Jamiary 31, 1448, he is styled " oure lievetenaunt in our reame of Fraunce, duchees of Normandie and Guyenne." — Stevetismi, I. 479, 480. The latter appointment should be regarded as the historical parallel of Gloucester's " doome " on the dramatic second day : " Let Somerset be Regent o're the French."— 2 Hen. VI., I. iii. 209. 2 John de Whethamstede (ed. Heame, pp. 345, 346). 3 See next page. y charge [Somerset caused York's 252 HENRY VI. PART II, [Paris lost liecause Edmund Beaafort hindered York's despatch.] [Covert attacks made upon Gloucester.] tEleanor Cobham accused of Intending york says (U. 170-175) : ... if I be appointed for the Place, My Lord of Somerset will keepe me here, Without Discharge, Money, or Furniture, Till France be wonne into the Dolphins hands : Last time, I danc't attendance on his will Till Paris was besieg'd, famisht, and lost. Holinshed, paraphrasing Halle (179), illustrates this complaint of Edmund Beaufort's malice in 1436, when York was appointed to succeed Bedford (see p. 219 above). [Hoi. Hi. 612/2/ 14. Halle, 179.] Although the duke of Yorke was worthie (both for birth and courage) of this honor and prefer- ment, yet so disdeined of Edmund duke of Summerset, (being cousme to the king,) that by all meanes possible he sought his hinderance, as one glad of his losse, and sorie of his well dooing : by reason whereof, yer the duke of Yorke could get his dispatch, Paris and diuerse other of the cheefest places in France were gotten by the French king. Act I. sc. iv. — In this scene the Duchess of Gloucester causes a spirit to be raised, from whom she learns the future fates of Henry, Suffolk, and Somerset.^ Examination of the charges brought against Cardinal Beaufort by Gloucester in 1440 (see pp. 236, 250 above) was committed to Henry's [Hoi. iii. 622/2/58. Halle, 202.] councell, whereof the more part were spirituall persons ; so that, what for feare, and what for fauour, the matter was winked at, and nothing said to it : onelie faire countenance was made to the duke, as though no malice had beene conceiued against him. But venem will breake out, & inward grudge will soone appeare, which was this yeare to all men apparant : for diuers secret attempts were aduanced forward this season, against this noble man Humfreie duke of Glocester, a far off, which, in conclusion, came so neere, that they beereft him both of life and land ; as shall hereafter more plainelie appeere. For, first, this yeare, dame Eleanor Cobham, wife to the said duke, was accused of treason ; ^ for that she by sorcerie and inchant- ' For the prophecies concerning the deaths of Suflfolk and Somerset see p. 270, n. 2, and p. 289. '^ She was arrested in the latter part of July, 1441. — Ghron. Rich. II. — Men. VI., 57, 58. Wyrc, 460. The discrepancy of these authorities, and the inaccuracy of Chron. Rich. II. — Sen. VI. with regard to the days of the week, do not allow a more precise date to be given. X. HENEY VI. PART II. 253 ment intended to destroie the king, to the intent to aduance hir to destroy 11,, _ Henry by husband vnto the crowne. ... [p. 623, eol. l.J At the same sorcery.] season were arrested, arreigned, and adiudged giltie, as aiders to the duchesse, Thomas Southwell priest, and canon of S. Stephans f^erwSs!] at Westminster, lohn Hun priest, Roger Bolingbrooke a cunning ^K<«»/oii» necromancer (as it was said), and Margerie lordeine, surnamed the witch of Eie. [A waxen image of The matter laid against them was, for that they (at the request ^^ST "^^^ of the said duchesse) had deuised an image of wax, representing '""'°"™' ' the king, which by their sorcerie by little and little consumed; intending thereby in conclusion to waste and destroie the kings person. There is not even an allusion in the play to the ofEence for which, according to Halle, the Duchess and her confederates were arraigned. But Stow (627) says that ^^^ broke Roger Bolingbroke was examined before the Bangs Counsaile, ™^^'^ where he confessed that he wrought the said Negromancie at the ciwwm to stirring and procurement of the said Dame Elianor, to knowe what futSL]*' should befall of hir, and to what estate she should come, . . . Act II. sc. i. — Sir Thomas More's dyodoge . . . Wheryn he treatyd dyuers mate/rs as of tlie veriercbcyon & worshyp of ymagys & relyqiies , prayng to sayntis & goynge on pylgrymage (2nd ed.,^ 1530, bk. I. chap, xiv. leaf 25) contains the earliest account of the sham miracle at St. Albans. The dramatic version of this story presents no important change save that the rogue is made to feign lameness as well as blindness ; a variation which leads . up to his being whipped ofE the stage. The following excerpt from More's Dialogue should be compared with Act II., sc. i., 11. 60-160: ... I remember me that I haue herde my father tell of a begger that, in kynge Henry his dayes the syxte, came wyth hys wyfe to saynt Albonys. And there was walkynge about the towne 1 So in Halle (202) and in The Contention. Though the name rymes to "Mum" in 2 Men. VI., I. ii. 88, the spelling is "Hume" throughout scenes ii. and iv., Act I. In Fab. (614) and Stow (628) the name is spelt " Hum." 2 "Newly ouersene" by More. More's story of the sham miracle was oopied by Grafton (i. 630) and Foace (i. 679/2). Foxe—I know not on whose authority— says that the cheat was discovered in Henry VI.'s "young dayes," when the King was "yet vnder the gouemaunce of this Duke Humfrey his protector." Weever (321, 322) gives an epitaph " penciled" on the wall near Gloucester's tomb in St. Alban's Abbey ; recording the Duke's detection of the man who feigned blindness. 254 X. HENRY VI. PART II. and his wife ^^SSJ^S ^ ft^^ OF syxe daycs before the kyngys commynge thyther; 6rt!"lii«m3 saynge that he was borne blynde, and neuer saw in his lyfe. And when Henry ^^^ wamod in his dreame that he shold come out of Berwyke there") (where he sayd he had euer dwelled) to seke saynt Albon ; and that Ktehe ^6 t^'d ten at his shryne, and had not bene holpen. And therfore bUnd^aSd, he woId go sekc hym at some other place ; for he had herde some dream, had sayc, syns he came, that saynt Albonys body sholde be at Colon : journeyed B?J?rickto ^^^ ^^ ^^^^ suche a contencyon hath there bene. But of trouth, St. Albans.] ^s I am suTcly informed, he lyeth here at saynt Albonys ; sauyng [But. not Jetog some relyques of hym, whiche they there shew shryned. But to coioiS?^*" tell you forth: when the kyng was comen, and the towne full, MiOTed""* sodaynly this blynde man, at saynt albonys shryne, had his syght bi^'i^.f agayne : and a myracle solemply rongen and te deum songen ; so g^en King ^jjg^j nothyuge was talked of in all j" towne but this myracle. So ^Teggar happened it than that duke Humfry of gloucester, a great wyse and people man and very well lerned, hauynge greate loy to se such a myracle, that a called y° pore man vnto hym. And fyrst shewynge hym selfe TOo^ht ] loyouse of goddys glory, so shewed in the gettynge of his syght ; [Gloucester and cxortyng hym to mekenes, and to none ascrybyng of any parte humble*" ^^ *^® worssyp to hym selfe ; nor to be proude of the peoples prayse, whiche wolde call hym a good and a godly man therby. At last tandasited he loked wcl Tpou his eyen, and-asked whyther he coulde neuer se could ever nothvuge at all in all his lyfe before. And, whara as well his wyfe see anything jo j > .; before.] 3,8 hymselfe afifermed fastely "no," than he loked aduysedly vpon and his wife his cycu agayu, & sayd : "I byleue you very well, for me thynketh "no"; yet, "that yc can not se well yet." "Yes, syr," quod he, "I thanke "god and his holy marter, I can se nowe as well as any man." [when "Ye can," quod the duke, "what colour is my gowne?" Than ^to^oouu ' anone the begger, tolde hym. "What colour," quod he, "is this raSura' ^^ " mawnys gowne ? " He tolde hym also ; and so forth, without any (Th™ styckynge, he tolde hym the names of all the colours that could be oauerMm shewcd hym.^ And, whan my lord saw that, he bad ^ hym, " walke, setSin" " faytoure ! " and made hym be set openly in the stockys. For, though he coulde haue sene sodenly by myracle y° dyfference > With " I byleue . . . shewed hym," cp. 2 Hen. VI., II. i. 106-112. " bad] ed. 1. had ed. 2. X. HENRY VI. PART II. 255 bytwene dyuers colours, yet coulde he not by y' syght so sodenly [For, if the tell the names of all these colours, but yf he hadde knowen them ^^om 1 « Duna, he betore, no more than the names of all the men y' he shold sodenly S2,yJ°,^^ed se. [Lfxxv.sign.fi.] ^^^ midit have Act II. sc. ii.— At the close of sc. iv., Act I., after the Duchess of ^Jj Gloucester and her confederates had been arrested, York sent Salisbury them.i and Warwick an invitation to sup with him " to morrow Night " ; that is, the night of the day on which Gloucester exposed the sham miracle. Supper ended, York desires to have his guests' opinion of his title to " Englands Crowne" (II. ii. 1-5). Warwick says (11. 7, 8) : Sweet Yorke, begin : and if thy clayme be good, The Neuills are thy Subiects to command. The dramatic time of sc. ii., Act II., is brought into close relation with Eleanor Cobham's arrest in 1441, but Holinshed's authority Halle records (210) among the events of 1447-48 that [ffol. iii. 627/2/37.J Richard, duke of Yorke, (being greatlie alied by his wife to the chiefe peeres and potentates of the realme, beside his owne progenie,) perceiuing the king to be no ruler, but the whole burthen of the realme to rest in direction of the queene, & the duke of Suffolke, began secretlie to allure his friends of the The duke of nobilitie ; ^ and priuilie declared vnto them his title and right to the tmpmng crowne, and likewise did he to certeme wise gouemours of diuerse **"« *» '*« cities and townes. Which attempt was so politikelie handled, and so secretlie kept, that prouision to his purpose was readie, before his purpose was openlie published ; and his friends opened them- selues, yer the contrarie part could them espie : for in conclusion all shortlie in mischiefe burst out, as ye may hereafter heare. On October 16, 1460, "a writyng,* conteignyng the clayme and title of the right " which York laid " unto the Corones of Englond and of Praunce, and Lordship of Ireland," was read before the Lords Spiritual and Temporal assembled in Parliament at Westminster. This document, or a similar one, was printed by Stow in his Annmles (679, 680) ; and from Stow it was transferred to the pages of Holinshed.* It sets forth York's pedigree. I quote in parallel columns II. ii. 10-20, and the corresponding passage in Holinshed. York thus prefaces his claim : 1 For passages in which Salisbury and Warwick are spoken of as York's friends, see pp. 283, 288 below. 2 Printed in Bot. Pa/rl, v. 375. * A prefatory sidenote thus describes Hoi's repript of this document : « Abr[aham] Fl[eming] ex I.S [John Stow], pag. 700, 701, &c. in Quart." 256 X. HENRY VI. PART II. lEdward \Hol. iii. 657/2/47.1 Edward Edward the third, my Lords, had III.'s sons.) , , . , , , . -rin i ■ seuen Sonnea : the thvrd had issue, Edwwrd pnnce The first, Edward the Black-Prince, of Wales; William of Eatfield, his Prince of Wales ; ^ „ ^ , ,„ •' , 7-. 77 7 w J The second, William of Eatfield; 12 second, sonne ; Lionell the third, ^^^^ ^^^ third duke of Clarence; lohn of Gant, Lionel Duke of Clarence: next to ioxxrth,duke of Lancaster; Edmwnd ^^s^Xam of Gaunt, the JMke of of Langleie, fft, duke of Torke; Lancaster; Thmms of Woodstoke, sixt, duke of The^« was Edmond Langley, Duke J- TIT- J of Torke; Glocester; and William, of Windsor, The sixt was Thomas of Woodstock, 16 sea/uenth Luke of Gloster ; _, ' . - „ , , . . William of Windsor was the seucTith The said Mdwa/rd prince ot ^nd last. Wales, which died in the life time Edward the Black-Prince dyed before (Richard II.] of his father, had issue Richmd, ^niTleft hlhinde him Eichavd, his which succeeded Edward the third onely ' Sonne, his OT-andsirp • ^^°' ^^^^ Edward the thirds death, 20 nis granasire , . . . laign'd as King : . . I now quote four lines immediately following my last excerpt from York's statement of his title : Till Hemry Bullinghrooke, Duke of Lancaster, The eldest Sonne and Heire of lohn of Gaunt, Crown'd by the Name of Henry the fourth, Seiz'd on the Reahne, depos'd the rightfull King, ... 24 Though these lines contain matter of common knowledge, they may have been prompted by the ensuing fragments of a speech which, according to Halle (245, 246), York delivered from the throne to the Peers assembled at Westminster in 1460 : [Richard II. \Hol. ill. 656/i/i.] Which king Richard, of that name the king.] second, was lawfuUie & iustlie possessed of the crowne and diadem of this realme and region, till Henrie of Derbie duke of Lancaster [Henry duke ^"^^ Hereford, Sonne to lohn of Gant . . . wrongftdlie Tsurped rf Lancas er ^^^ intruded vpon the roiall power, and high estate of this realme and region ; taking vpon him the name, stile, and authoritie of king and gouernour of the same. Salisbury interjects (1. 33) : But WiUiam, of Eatfield dyed without an Heire. * The corresponding passage in the 3rd (1619) ed. of The Contention stands thus (23) : " Now Edward the blaoke Prince dyed before his Father, leauing behinde him two sennas, Edward borne at Angolesme, who died young, and Richard that was after crowned King," . . . flbi. (iii. 397/ 1/5 6) says: "In the nine and thirtith yeere of king Edwards reigne, and in the monetb of Februarie [1365], in the citie of Angolesme, was borne the first sonne of prince Edward, and was named after his father, but he departed this life the seuenth yeare of his age." usurper.] X. HENRY VI. PART 11. 257 In my last quotation from the pedigree printed by Holinshed the line is carried down to Richard II., who " succeeded Edward the third his grandsire." The next words are : [Eol. iii. 657/2/56.] Richard died without issue ; William of ^Seu.f Hatfield, the second sonne of Edward the third, died without issue ; . . . The continuation of York's speech (11. 34-38) I place beside the parallel passage in Holinshed : \Hol. iii. 657/2/58.] Lionell the The third Sonne, Duke of Clarenee, [York's third Sonne of Edward the third, from whose Line Lione°*dukr duke of Ghm-ence, had issue Philip i dayme the Crowne, had Isme, otcv>x