l l» M f CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 189I BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE Cornell University Library PR 4238.C97 Browning and the dramatic monologue; 3 1924 013 444 736 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tlie Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924013444736 WORKS OF S, S. CURRY, Ph.D., Litt.D. Of eminent value. — De. Ltuan Abbott. Both method and s^airitpracticaZly withovi precedent. — J, M. liEVEQUB, Editor Mommg World, New Orleans. PROVINCE OF EXPRESSION. A atudy of the general problems regarding delivery and. the principles underly- ing its development. $1.50 ; to teachers, $1.20. The work of a highly intellectual man who thinks and feels deeply, who is in earnest and whose words are entitled to the most thoughtful consideration. — Wii>LUJi 'Wibtsb. LESSONS IN VOCAL B:M»RESSI0N. Study of the modu- lations of the voice as caused by action of Uie mind. It Is the beat book on expression I ever read, far ahead of any- thing published. —Prof. Geoeoe A. Vditon, Chicago. IMAGINATION AND DRAMATIC INSTINCT. Creative action of the mind, insight, sympathy, and assimilation in vocal expression. The best book ever published on elocution. — A prominent teacher and public reader. VOCAL AND LITERARY INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLE. Deserves the attention of everyone. — The Scotsman^ Edinboro. Will serve to abolish "hardshell" reading where "hardshell** preaching is no longer tolerated. — Db. Lthak Abbott. FOUNDATIONS OF EXPRESSION. Principles and funda- mental steps in the training of the mind, body, and voice in speaking. " By its aid I have accomplished double the usual results. *' BROWNING AND THE DRAMATIC MONOLOGUE. In- troduction to Browning's poetry and dramatic platform art. Studies of some later phases of dramatic ezpreaaion. $1.25; to teachers, $1.10 postpaid. CLASSICS FOR VOCAL EXPRESSION. $1.25; to teachers, $1.10 postpaid. OTS£R BOOKS m PREPARATION. Join the Expression League b^ sending the names of three persons interested, and information will be sent you regarding all these books. Address THE EXPRESSION LEAGUE Room 308, Pierce Building, Copley Set. Boston, Mass. BROWNING AND THE DRAMATIC MONOLOGUE NATURE AND INTERPRETATION OF AN OVERLOOKED FORM OF LITERATURE S. S. CURRY, Ph.D., LITT.D. President of the School of Expression BOSTON EXPRESSION COMPANY Pierce Buildino, Copley Square coptbight, 1908 By S. S. Curby THB UNIVERSITY PKBSS, OAUBBIDOB, V. S. A. CONTENTS Part I THE MONOLOGUE AS A DRAMATIC FORM Page I. A New Literary Form 1 II. The Speaker 12 III. The Hearer 30 IV. Place or Situation 64 V. Time and Connection 78- VI. Argument 86 VII. The Monologue as a Form of Literature . 100 VIII. History of the Monologue 113 Part II DRAMATIC RENDERING OF THE MONOLOGUE IX. Necessity of Oral Rendition 133 X. Actions of Mind and Voice 147 XI. Actions of Mind and Body 172 XII. The Monologue and Metre 195 XIII. Dialect 222 XIV. Properties 230 XV. Faults in Rendering a Monologue . . . 241 XVI. Importance of the Monologue 248% XVII. Some Typical Monologues from Browning . 265 Index 305 PART I THE MONOLOGUE AS A DRAMATIC FORM I. A NEW LITERARY FORM Why were the poems of Robert Browning so long unread ? Why was his real message or spirit under- stood by few forty years after he began to write ? The story is told that Douglas Jerrold, when recovering from a serious illness, opened a copy of "Sordello, " which was among some new books sent to him by a friend. Sentence after sentence brought no consecutive thought, and at last it dawned upon him that perhaps his sickness had wrecked his mental faculties, and he sank back on the sofa, overwhelmed with dismay. Just then his wife and sister entered and, thrusting the book into their hands, he eagerly demanded what they thought of it. He watched them intently, and when at last Mrs. Jerrold exclaimed, "I do not understand what this man means," Jerrold uttered a cry of relief, "Thank God, I am not an idiot!" Browning, while protesting that he was not obscure, used to tell this story with great enjoyment. What was the chief cause of the almost universal failure to understand Browning ? Many reasons are assigned. His themes were such as had never before been found in poetry, his allusions and il- lustrations so unfamiliar as to presuppose wide knowledge on the part of the reader; he had a very concise and abrupt way of stating things. 2 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Yet, after all, were these the chief causes ? Was he not obscure because he had chosen a new or unusual dramatic form ? Nearly every one of his poems is written in the form of a monologue, which, according to Professor Johnson, "may be termed a novelty of invention in Browning." Hence, to the average man of a generation ago, Browning's poems were written in almost a new language. This secret of the difficulty of appreciating Browning is not even yet fully realized. There are many "Introductions" to his poems and some valuable works on his life, yet nowhere can we find an adequate discussion of his dramatic form, its nature, and the influence it has exerted upon modern poetry. Let us endeavor to take the point of view of the average man who opened one of Browning's vol- umes when first published; or let us imagine the feeling of an ordinary reader to-day on first chanc- ing upon such a poem as "The Patriot." The average man beginning to read, "It was roses, roses," fancies he is reading a mere story and waits for the unfolding of events, but very soon becomes confused. Where is he ? Nothing hap- pens. Somebody is talking, but about what.? One who looks for mere effects and not for causes, for facts and not for experiences, for a mere sequence of events, and not for the laying bare of the motives and struggles of the human heart, will be apt soon to throwT;he book down and turn to his daily paper to read the accounts of stocks, fires, or murders, disgusted with the very name of Browning, if not with poetry. If he look more closely, he will find a subtitle, "An Old Story," but this confuses him still more. A New Literary Form 3 "Story" is evidently used in some peculiar sense, and "old" may be used in the sense of ancient, familiar, or of t- repeated ; it may imply that certain results always follow certain conditions. If a care- THE PATRIOT AN OLD STOET It was roses, roses, all the way, With myrtle mixed in my path like mad: The house-roofs seemed to heave and sway, The church-spires flamed, such flags they had, A year ago on this very day. The air broke into a mist with bells, The old walls rocked with the crowd and cries. Had I said, " Good folk, mere noise repels — But give me your sun from yonder skies ! " They had answered "And afterward, what else?" Alack, it was I who leaped at the sun To give it my loving friends to keep ! Naught man could do, have I left undone : And you see my harvest, what I reap This very day, now a year is run. There 's nobody on the house-tops now — Just a palsied few at the windows set; For the best of the sight is, all allow. At the Shambles' Gate — or, better yet. By the very scaffold's foot, I trow. I go in the rain, and-, more than needs, A rope cuts both my wrists behind; And I think, by the feel, my forehead bleeds, For they fling, whoever has a mind. Stones at me for my year's misdeeds. Thus I entered, and thus I go ! In triumphs, people have dropped down dead. "Paid by the world, what dost thou owe Me ? " — God might question; now instead, 'T is God shall repay : I am safer so. 4 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue ful student glance through the poem, he will find that the Patriot is one who entered the city a year before, and who during this time has done his best to secure reforms, but at the end of the year is led forth to the scaffold. The poem pictures to us the thoughts that stir his mind on the way to his death. He recognizes the same street, he remembers the roses, the myrtle, the house-roofs so crowded that they seem to heave and sway, the flags on the church spires, the bells, the wilhngness of the mul- titude to give him even the sun; but he it is who aimed at the impossible — to give his friends the sun. Having done all he could, now comes his reward. There is nobody on the house-tops, and only a few too old to go to the scaffold have crept to the windows. The great crowd is at the gate or at the scaffold's foot. He goes in the rain, his hands tied behind him, his forehead bleeding from the stones that are hurled at him. The closing thought, so abruptly expressed, the most difficult one in the poem, is a mere hint of what might have happened had he triumphed in the world's sense of the word. He might have fallen dead, — dead in a deeper sense than the loss of life ; his soul might have be- come dead to truth, to noble ideals, and to aspira- tion. Had he done what men wanted him to do, he would have been paid by the world. He has certainly not done the world's bidding, and in a few short words he reveals his resignation, his heroism, and his sublime triumph. "Now instead, 'T is God shall repay : I am safer so." The first line of the last stanza in the first edition of the poem contained the word "Brescia," sug- A New Literary Form 5 gesting a reference to the reformer Arnold. But Browning later omitted "Brescia," because the poem was not meant to be in any sense historical, but rather to represent the reformer of every age whose ideals are misunderstood and whose noblest work is rewarded by death. "History," said Aris- totle, "tells what Alcibiades did, poetry what he ought to have done." "The Patriot" is not a matter-of-fact narrative, but a revelation of human experience. The reader must approach such a poem as a work of art. Sympathetic and contemplative at- tention must be given to it as an entirety. Then point after point, idea after idea, will become clear and vivid, and at last the whole will be intensely realized. For another example of Browning's short poems take "A Woman's Last Word." Suppose one tries to read this as if it were an ordinary lyric. One is sure to be greatly confused as to its meaning. What is it all about? The words are simple enough, and while the ordinary man recognizes this, he is all the more perplexed. Perceiving certain merits, he exclaims, "If a man can write such beautiful individual lines, why does he not make his whole story clear and simple.''" K, however, one will meditate over the whole, take hints here and there and put them together, a distinct picture is slowly formed in the mind. A wife, whose husband demands that she explain to him something in her past life, is speaking. She has perhaps loved some one before him, and his curiosity or jealousy is aroused. The poem really constitutes her appeal to his higher nature and her insistence upon the sacredness of their present re- 6 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue lation, which she fears words may profane. She does not even fully understand the past herself. To explain would be false to him, hence with love and tenderness she pleads for delay. Yet she promises to speak his "speech," but "to-morrow, not to-night.' Perhaps she hopes that his mood will change;' possibly she feels that he is not now in the right attitude of mind to understand sympathize with her experiences. or A WOMAN'S LAST WORD Let 'b contend no more, Love, Strive nor weep: All be as before, Love, — Only sleep ! What so wild as words are ? I and thou In debate, as birds are. Hawk on bough ! See the creature stalking While we speak ! Hush and hide the talking, Cheek on cheek. What so false as truth is, False to thee ? Where the serpent's tooth is, Shun the tree — • Where the apple reddens. Never pry — Lest we lose our Edens, Eve and I. Be a god and hold me With a charm ! Be a man and fold me With thine arm ! Teach me, only teach, Love ! As I ought I will speak thy speech, Love, Think thy thought — Meet, if thou require it, Both demands Laying flesh and spirit In thy hands. , That shall be to-morrow, Not to-night: I must bury sorrow Out of sight: — Must a little weep, Love, (Foolish me !) And so fall asleep. Love, Loved by thee. In this poem a most dehcate relation between two human beings is interpreted. Short though it is, it yet goes deeper into motives, concentrates atten- tion more energetically upon one point of view, A New Literary Form 7 and is possibly more impressive than if the theme had been unfolded in a play or novel. It turns the listener or reader within himself, and he feels in his own breast the response to her words. All great art discharges its function by evoking imagination and feeling, but it is not always the intellectual meaning which first appears. However far apart these two poems may be in spirit or subject, there are certain characteristics common to them; they are both monologues. The monologue, as Browning has exemplified it, is one end of a conversation. A definite speaker is conceived in a definite, dramatic situation. Usu- ally we find also a well-defined listener, though his character is understood entirely from the impres- sion he produces upon the speaker. We feel that this Ustener has said something and that his pres- ence and character influence the speaker's thought, words, and manner. The conversation does not consist of abstract remarks, but takes place in a definite situation as a part of human life. We must realize the situation, the speaker, the hearer, before the meaning can become clear ; and it is the failure to do this which has caused many to find Browning obscure.^ For example, observe Browning's "Confessions." CONFESSIONS What is he buzzing in my ears ? "Now that I come to die, Do I view the world as a vale of tears ? " Ah, reverend sir, not I ! What I viewed there once, what I view again Where the physic bottles stand On the table's edge, — is a suburb lane. With a wall to my bedside hand. 8 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue That lane sloped, much as the bottles do. From a house you could descry O'er the garden-wall: is the curtain blue Or green to a healthy eye ? To mine, it serves for the old June weather Blue above lane and wall; And that farthest bottle labelled "Ether" Is the house o'er-topping all. At a terrace, somewhere near the stopper. There watched for me, one June, A girl : I know, sir, it 's improper. My poor mind 's out of tune. Only, there was a way . . . you crept Close by the side, to dodge . Eyes in the house, two eyes except: They styled their house "The Lodge." What right had a lounger up their lane ? But, by creeping very close. With the good wall's help, — their eyes might strain And stretch themselves to Oes, Yet never catch her and me together. As she left the attic, there. By the rim of the bottle labelled "Ether," And stole from stair to stair, And stood by the rose-wreathed gate. Alas, We loved, sir — used to meet : How sad and bad and mad it was — But then, how it was sweet ! Here, evidently, the speaker, who has "come, to die," has been aroused by some "reverend sir," who has been expostulating with him and uttering conventional phrases about the vanity of human life. Such superficial pessimism awakens protest, and the dying man remonstrates in the words of the poem. A New Literary Form 9 The speaker is apparently in bed and hardly believes himself fully possessed of his senses. He even asks if the curtain is "green or blue to a healthy eye," as if he feared to trust his judgment, lest it be perverted by disease. An abrupt beginning is very characteristic of a monologue, and when given properly, the first words arrest attention and suggest the situation. After the speaker's bewildered repetition of the visitor's words and his blunt answer "not I," which says such views are not his own, he talks of his "bedside hand," turns a row of bottles into a street, and tells of the sweetest experience of his life. He refuses to say that it was not sweet; he will not allow an abnormal condition such as his sickness to determine his views of life. The result is an in- trospection of the deeper hope found in the heart of man. The poem is not an essay or a sermon, it is not the lyric expression of a mood ; it portrays the conflict of individual with individual and reveals the deep- est motives of a character. It is not a dialogue, but only one end of a conversation, and for this reason it more intensely and definitely focuses attention. We see deeper into the speaker's spirit and view of life, while we recognize the superficiality of the creed of his visitor. The monologue thus is dramatic.^ [Ht interprets human experience and charact^ •» No one who intelligently reads Browning can fail to realize that he was a dramatic poet ; in fact he was the first, if not the only, English dramatic poet of the nineteenth century. With his deep in- sight into the life of his age, as well as his grasp of character, he was the one master whose writing lo Browning and the Dramatic Monologue was needed for the drama of that century ; yet he early came into conflict with the modern stage and ceased to write plays before he had mastered the play as a work of art. He was, however, by nature so dramatic in his point of view that he could never be anything else than a dramatic poet. Hence, he was led to in- vent, or adopt, a dramatic form different-frOm the play. ' From the midst of the conflict between poet and stage, between writer and stage artist, the monologue was evolved, or at least recognized and completed as an objective dramatic form. Any study of the monologue must thus centre attention upon Browning. 'As Shakespeare reigns the supreme master of the play, so Browning has_ no peer in the monologue. ^Others have followed him in its use, but his monologues remain the most numerous, varied, and expressive.' The development of the monologue, in some sense, is connected with the struggles of the modern stage to express the conditions of modern life. A great change has taken place in human experience. In modern civilization the conflicts and complex struggles of human character are usually hidden. Men and women now conceal their emotions. Self-control and repression form a part of the civi- lized ideal. Men no longer shed tears in pubhc as did Homer's heroes. In our day, a man who is injured does not avenge himself, or if he does he rarely retains the sympathy of his fellow-men. On the contrary, the person wronged now turns over his wronger to the law ; conflicts of man with man are fought out in the courts, and a well-ordered gov- ernment inflicts punishment and rights wrongs. All modern life and experience have become more A New Literary Form ii subjective; hence, it is natural that dramatic art should change its form. Let no one suppose, how- ever, that this change marks the death of dramatic representation. Dramatic art in some shape is nec- essary as a means of expression in every age. It has become more subtle and suggestive, but it is none the less dramatic. An important phase of the changes in the char- acter of dramatic art is the recognition of the monologue. The adoption of this form shows the tendency of dramatic art to adapt itself to modern times. The dramatic monologue, however, did not arise in opposition to the play, but as a new and parallel aspect of dramatic art. It has not the same theme as the play, does not deal with the expression of human life in movement or the complex struggles of human beings with each other, but it reveals the struggle in the depths of the soul. It exhibits the dramatic attitude of mind or the point of view. It is more subjective, more intense, and also more sug- gestive than the play. It reveals motives and char- acter by a flash to an awakened imagination. However this new dramatic form may be ex- plained, whatever may be its character, there is hardly a book of poetry that has appeared in re- cent years that does not contain examples. Many popular writers, it may be unconsciously, employ this form almost to the exclusion of all others. The name itself occurs rarely in English books ; but the name is nothing, — the monologue is there. The presence of the form of the monologue before its full recognition is a proof that it is natural and important. ^Forms of art are not invented ; they are rather discovered-:^ They are direct languages ; 12 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue each expresses something no other can say. If the monologue is a distinct literary form, then it pos- sesses certain possibiUties in expressing the human spirit which are peculiar to itself. It must say something that nothing else can say so well, lis use by Browning, and the greater and greater fre- quency of its adoption among recent writers, seems to prove the necessity of a careful study of its pecu- liarities, possibilities, and rendition. II. THE SPEAKER What is there peculiar about the monologue ? Can its nature or structure be so explained that a seemingly diflScult poem, such as a monologue by Browning, may be made clear and forcible ? In the first place, one should note that the mono- logue gets_ its, unity from_thR rhgT-f^rW of the spgaJii@{^ It is not merelyan impersonal thought, but the expression of one individual to another. It was Hegel, I think, who said that all art implies the expression of a truth, of a thought or feeling, to a person. In nature we find everywhere a spontaneous un- folding, as in the blooming of a flower. There is no direct presentation of a truth to the apprehen- sion of some particular mind ; no modification of it by the character, the prejudice, or the feeling of the speaker. The lily unfolds its loveliness, but does not adapt the time or the direction of its bloom- ing to dominate the attention of some indifferent observer, or express its message so definitely and pointedly as to be more easily understood. The Speaker 13 Man, however, rarely, if ever, expresses a truth without a personal coloring due to his own char- acter and the character of the listener. The same truth uttered by diflferent persons appears differ- ent. Occasionally a little child, or a man with a childlike nature, may think in a blind, natural way without adapting truth to other minds ; but such direct, spontaneous, and truthful expression is ex- tremely rare. iJt is one of the most important func- tions of art to teach us the f act_that there is always "an intervention of personality," which needs to be reahzed in its specific interpretation. ' The monologue is a study of the effect of mind upon mind, of the adaptation of the ideas of one individual to another, and of the revelation this makes of the characters of speaker and listener. The nature of the monologue will be best under- stood by comparing it with some of the literary forms which it resembles, or with which it is often unconsciously confused. On account of the ,fact that there is but one speaker, it has been confused with oratory. A monologue is often conceived as a kind of stilted conversational oration; and the word monologue is apt to call to mind some talker, like Coleridge, who monopohzed the whole conversation. A monologue, however, is not a speech. An oration is the presentation of truth to an audience by a personality. There is some purpose at stake ; the speaker must strengthen convictions and cause decisions on some point at issue. ' But a mono- logue is not an address to an audience; it is a study of character^ of the processes of thinking in one individuaras moulded by the presence of some other personahty.i Its theme is not merely the 14 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue thought uttered, but primarily the character of the speaker, who consciously or unconsciously unfolds himseK."^ Again, the monologue has been confused with the lyric poem. Browning called one of his vol- umes "Dramatic Lyrics"; another, "Dramatic Idyls"; and another, "Dramatic Romances and Lyrics." Though many monologues are lyric in spirit, they are more frequently dramatic. A lyric is the utterance of an individual intensely realizing a specific situation, and implies deep feel- ing. But the monologue may or may not be emo- tional. No doubt it may result from as intense a realization as the lyric poem. It resembles a lyric in being simple and in being usually short, but is unlike it in that its theme is chiefly dramatic, its interest indirect, and that it lays bare to a far greater degree human motives in certain situa- tions and under the ruling forces of a hfe. The monologue is like a lyric also in that it must be recognized as a complete whole. Each clause must be understood in relation to others as a part of the whole. An essay can be understood sen- tence after sentence. A story gives a sequence of events for their own sake. A discussion may con- sist of a mere recital or succession of facts. In all these the whole is built up part by part. But the monologue differs from all these in that the whole must be felt from the beginning. Further, in the monologue ideas are not given directly, as in the story or essay, but usually the more important points are suggested indirectly. The attention of the reader or hearer is focussed upon a living human being. ^C^hat is said is not necessarily a universal and impersonal truth, it is The Speaker 15 the opinion of a certain type of man. We judge what is said by the character of the speaker, by the person to whom he speaks, and by the occasion. Mr. Furnivall may prefer to have every man speak directly from the shoulder and may write slightingly of such an indirect way of stating a truth as we find in the monologue. We may all prefer, or think we do, the direct way of speaking, — a sermon or lecture, for example, — and disUke what Edmund Spenser called a "dark conceit"; but soon or late we shall agree with Spenser, the master of allegory, that the artistic method is "more interesting," and that example is better than precept. The monologue is one of the examples of the indir ect method common to all art — a method which is necessary on account of the peculiarities of human nature. One person finds it difficult to explain a truth directly to another. Nine-tenths of every picture is the product, not of perception, but of apperception. Hence, without the aid of art, we express in words only half truths. The monologue makes human expression more ade- quate. It is hke a nut; the shell must be pene- trated before we can find the kernel. The real truth of the monologue comes only after compre- hension of the whole.' It reserves its truth until the thought has slowly grown in the mind of the hearer. It holds back something until all parts are co-ordinated and "does the thing shall breed the thought." Accordingly, there are many things to settle in a monologue before the truth it con- tains can possibly be reahzed.' In the first place, we must decide who the speaker is, what is his character, and the specific attitude 1 6 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue of his mind. It is not merely the thought uttered that makes the impression. As a picture is some- thing between a thought and a thing, not an idea on the one hand nor an object on the other, but a union of the two, so the monologue unites a truth or idea with the personality that utters it. An idea, a fact, may be valuable, but it becomes clear and impressive to some human consciousness only by being united with a human soul, and stated from one point of view and with the force of an individual life. The story of Count Gismond, for example, is told by the woman he saved from disgrace, who loves him of all men, and who is now his wife. We feel the whole story colored by her gratitude, de- votion, and tenderness .'C^lie reader must conceive/ the character of the speaker, and enter into the depths of her motives, before understanding the thought; but after he has done so, he receives a clearer and more forcible impression than is other- wise possible>»> The stories of Sam Lawson by Mrs. Harriet Beecher Stowe are essentially monologues. In Professor Churchill's rendering of them the pe- culiarities of this Yankee were truly shown to be the chief centre of interest. As we realize the spirit of these stories, we easily imagine ourselves on the "shady side of a blueberry pasture," listen- ing to Sam talking to a group of boys, or possibly to only one boy, and our interest centres in the reve- lation of the working of his mind. His repose, his indifference to work, his insight into human nature, his quaint humor and sympathy, are the chief causes of the pleasure given by these stories. Possibly the letter is the literary form nearest to The Speaker 17 the monologue. We can easily see why. A good letter writer is dominated by his attention to one individual. The peculiar character of that indi- vidual is ever before him. The intimacy and abandon of the writer in pouring out his deepest thoughts is due to the sympathetic, confidential, conversational attitude of one human being to another. ^^ "Blessed be letters !" said Donald G. Mitchell. "They are the monitors, they are also the com- forters, they are the only true heart- talkers." There is, however, a great diflFerence between letters and conversation. In conversation "your truest thought is modified during its utterance by a look, a sign, a smile, or a sneer. It is not individ- ual ; it is not integral ; it is social, and marks half of you and half of others. It bends, it sways, it multiplies, it retires, it advances, as the talk of others presses, relaxes, or quickens." This effect of others upon the speaker is espe- cially expressed in the monologue, particularly in examples of a popular and humorous character. While the monologue is the accentuation of some specific attitude of one human being as modi- fied by contact with another, in a letter the attitude toward the other person is usually prolonged, due to past relationship; is more subjective, and ex- pressed without any change caused by the presence of the person addressed. In some very animated letters, however, the attitude of the future reader's mind is anticipated or realized by the writer, and there is more or less of an approximation to the monologue. At any rate, this realization of what the other will think colors the composition. Letters are animated in proportion as they possess this 2 1 8 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue dramatic character, and are at times practically monologues. The skilful writer of a monologue omits obscure references in words to the sneers and looks of the hearer, except those which directly change the current of the speaker's thought. All must centre in the impression made upon the character speak- ing. In conversation, at times, a talker becomes more or less obhvious of his companion, yet the presence of his listener all the time aflFects the atti- tude of his mind. If we render a letter artistically to a company of people, we necessarily turn it into a monologue. We read the letter with the person in our mind, as a listener, to whom it is directed. We do not give its deeper ideas and personal or dramatic sug- gestions to a company as a speech. It is not surprising to find many monologues in epistolary form. Browning's "Cleon," in which is so truly presented the spirit of the Greeks, — to whom Paul spoke and wrote and among whom he worked, — is a letter written by Cleon, a Greek poet, to King Protus, his friend. Protus has written to Cleon concerning the opinions held by one Paulus, a rumor of whose preaching of the doctrine of immortality has reached him. "An epistle containing the strange Medical Experi- ments of Karshish, the Arab Physician," is a letter from Karshish to his old teacher describing the strange case of Lazarus with an account of an in- terview with him after he had risen from the dead. This poem illustrates also the fact that a mono- logue may not be on the personal plane. Brown- ing is seemingly the only writer in English who has been able to present a character completely nega- The Speaker ig tive, or one without personal relations to the events. The character in this poem has a purely scientific attribute of mind and looks upon this event from a purely neutral point of view. It is only to him a curious case. By this method, the deeper signifi- cance may be given to the events while at the same time accentuating a peculiar type of mind, or it may be a rare moment in the life of nearly every individual. This poem is accordingly very inter- esting from a psychological point of view. It illus- trates the scientific temper. The French have many examples of such writers, but Browning gives the best, — in fact almost the only illustration in English literature. "The Biglow Papers," by Lowell, though in the form of letters, are really dramatic monologues. Each character is made to speak dramatically or in his own peculiar way. The chief interest of every one of these poems centres in the character speak- ing. The mental action is sustained consistently; the dramatic completeness, the definite point of view, and the dialect, enable us to picture the pe- culiar characters who think and feel, live and move, talk and act for our enjoyment. The monologue, accordingly, is nearer to the dialogue than to a letter. The differences between the dialogue and the monologue are the chief dif- ferences between the monologue and the play. In a dialogue there is a constant and immediate effect of another personality upon the speaker. The same is true of the monologue. The speaker of the monologue must accentuate the effect of his inter- locutor as flexibly and freely as in the case of the dialogue. In the dialogue, however, the speaker and the listener change places ; the monologue has 20 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue but one speaker, and can only suggest the views or character of a listener by revealing some impres- sion produced upon the speaker while in the act of speaking. This makes pauses and expressive modulations of the voice even more necessary in the monologue than in the dialogue. Yet the mere fact that a poem or literary work has but one speaker does not make it a monologue ; it may be a speech. Burns 's " For A' That and A' That" is a speech. Matthew Arnold may not be quite fair when he says that it is mere preaching, that Burns was not sincere, and that we find the real Burns in "The Jolly Beggars." Still, all must feel in reading it that Burns is exhorting others and railing a little at the world, but not revealing a character unconsciously or indirectly, through contact with either a man of another type, or through the exigencies of a given situation. Burns is boasting a little and asserting his independence. The monologue demands not only a speaker, but a speaker in such a situation as will cause him to reveal himself unconsciously and indirectly, and such a moment as will lay bare his deepest motives. He must speak also in a natural, lifelike way. There must be no suggestion of a platform, no conscious presentation of truth for a definite end, as with the orator. It is a peculiar fact that the most difficult of all things, is to tell the truth. Every man "knows a good many things that are not so." For every affirmation of importance, we demand witnesses. Whenever a man speaks, we look into his character, into the living, natural languages which are uncon- scious witnesses of the depth of his earnestness and sincerity. Even in every-day life men judge of The Speaker 21 truth by character. What a man is, always colors, if it does not determine, what he says. ' But the essence of the monologue is to bring what a man says and what he is into harmony. The interpreter of a monologue must be true to the character of the speaker. He must faithfully portray, not his own, but the attitude and bearing, feelings and impression, of this character. Every normal person would greatly admire the beauties of "the villa," but the "Italian person of qual- ity," in Browning's monologue, feels for it great contempt. In Browning's "Youth and Art" we feel con- tinually the point of view, the feehng, and the character of the speaker. / YOUTH AND ART It once might have been, once only: We lodged in a street together, You, a sparrow on the housetop lonely, I, a lone she-bird of his feather. Your trade was with* sticks and clay, You thumbed, thrust, patted, and polished. Then laughed, "They will see, some day. Smith made, and Gibson demolished." My business was song, song, song; I chirped, cheeped, trilled, and twittered, "Kate Brown 's on the boards ere long, And Grisi's existence imbittered!" I earned no more by a warble Than you by a sketch in plaster: You wanted a piece of marble, I needed a music-master. 22 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue We studied hard in our styles, Chipped each at a crast like Hindoos, For air, looked out on the tiles. For fun, watched each other's windows. You lounged, like a boy of the South, Cap and blouse — nay, a bit of beard, too ; Or you got it, rubbing your mouth With fingers the clay adhered to. And I — soon managed to find Weak points in the flower-fence facing. Was forced to put up a blind And be safe in my corset-lacing. No harm ! It was not my fault If you never turned your eye's tail up As I shook upon E in alt., Or ran the chromatic scale up; For spring bade the sparrows pair, And the boys and girls gave guesses. And stalls in our street looked rare With bulrush and water-cresses. Why did not you pinch a flower In a pellet of clay and fling it ? Why did not I put a power Of thanks in a look, or sing it ? I did look, sharp as a lynx (And yet the memory rankles) When models arrived, some minx Tripped up stairs, she and her ankles. But I think I gave you as good ! "That foreign fellow — who can know How she pays, in a playful mood, For his tuning her that piano ? " Could you say so, and never say, "Suppose we join hands and fortunes. And I fetch her from over the way, Her, piano, and long tunes and short tunes ? The Speaker 23 No, no; you would not be rash, Nor I rasher and something over: You 've to settle yet Gibson's hash. And Grisi yet hves in clover. But you meet the Prince at the Board. I 'm queen myself at bals-par^s, I Ve married a rich old lord. And you 're dubbed knight and an R. A. Each life 's unfulfilled, you see ; It hangs still patchy and scrappy; We have not sighed deep, laughed free. Starved, feasted, despaired, — been happy. And nobody calls you a dunce. And people suppose me clever; This could but have happened once. And we missed it, lost it forever. The theme is the dream and experience of two lovers. The speaker is married to a rich old lord, and her lover of other days, a sculptor, is "dubbed knight and an R. A." Stirred by her youthful dreams, or it may be by the meeting of her lover in society, or possibly in imagination, — as a queen of "bals-pares" would hardly talk to a "knight and an R. A." in this frank manner, — it is the woman who breaks forth suddenly with the dream of her old love — "It once might have been, once only," — and relates the story of the days when they were both young students, she of singing and he of sculp- ture, and describes, or lightly caricatures, their ex- perience. Is her laughter, as she goes on in such a playful mood describing the different events of their lives, an endeavor to conceal a hidden pain ? Has she grown worldly minded, sneering at every 24 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue youthful dream, even her own, or is she awakening from this worldly point of view to a realization at last of "life unfulfilled"? Browning, instead of an abstract discussion, presents in an artistic form an important truth, that he who lives for the world does not live at all. By introducing this woman to us in a serious atti- tude of mind, reflecting on the one hand a worldly mood, on the other the deep, abiding love of a true woman, he makes the desired impression. The last line throbs with deep emotion, and we feel how slowly and sadly she would acknowledge the failure of life: "And we missed it, lost it forever." Browning's "Caliban upon Setebos" furnishes a. forcible illustration of the importance of the speaker and the necessity of preserving his character and point of view in the monologue. "'Will sprawl" begins a long parenthesis which implies the first intention of Caliban to lie flat in "the pit's much mire." He describes definitely the position he likes "in the cool slush." The words express Cali- ban's feehngs at his noonday rest and the position he takes for enjoyment. He has not yet risen to the dignity of the consciousness of the ego. He does not use the pronoun "I" or the possessive "my." His verbs are impersonal, — "'Will sprawl," not "I will sprawl," — and he "Talks to his own self, howe'er he please, Touchmg that other whom his dam called God." He lies down in this position to have a good " think " regarding his "dam's God, Setebos." Notice the continual recurrence of the impersonal "thinketh" The Speaker 25 without any subject. Here we have a most humor- ous but really profound meditation of such a crea- ture with all the elements of " natural theology in the island." The subheading before the mono- logue, "Thou thoughtest that I was altogether such an one as thyself," indicates the current of Browning's ideas. When we have once pictured Caliban definitely in our minds with his "saith" and "thinketh," we perceive the analogy which he establishes after the manner of men between his own low nature and that of deity. To read such a work without a definite concep- tion of the character talking, makes utter nonsense of the reading. Every sentiment and feeling in the poem regarding God is dramatic. However deep or profound the lesson conveyed, it is entirely indirect. How diflferent is the story of the glove and King Francis, as treated by Leigh Hunt, from its inter- pretation by Browning ! Leigh Hunt centres every- thing in the sequence of events and the simple statement of facts. "King Francis was a hearty king, and loved a royal sport, And one day as his lions fought, sat looking on the court." But Browning! He chooses a, distinct character, Peter Ronsard, a poet, to tell the story, and adopts a totally different point of view, centring all in the speaker's justification of the woman who threw the glove. Practically the same facts are told ; even the King's words are almost identical with those given by Hunt: " 'T was mere vanity, Not love, set that task to humanity ! " 26 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue and he gives the ordinary point of view: "Lords and ladies alike turned with loathing From such a provpd wolf in sheep's clothing." But human character and motive is given a deeper interpretation and the poet does not accept their views : "Not so, I; for I caught the expression In her brow's undisturbed self-possession Amid the court's scoffing and merriment; — As if from no pleasing experiment, She rose, yet of pain not much heedful So long as the process was needful." The poet'foUowed her and asked what it all meant, and if she did not wish to recall her rash deed. "For I, so I spoke, am a poet, Human nature, — behooves that I know it ! " So he tells you she explained that he had vowed and boasted what he would do, and she felt that she would put him to the test. Browning represents her as rejecting Delorge, whose admiration was shown by this incident to be superficial, and as marrying a humble but true-hearted lover. "The Ring and the Book" illustrates possibly more amply than any other poem the peculiar dramatic force of the monologue. The story, out of which is built a poem twice as long as "Paradise Lost," can be told in a few words. Guido, a nobleman of Arezzo, poor, but of noble family, has sought advancement at the Papal Court. Embittered by failure, he resolves to es- tablish himself by marriage with an heiress, and makes an offer for Pompilia, an innocent girl of sixteen, the only child of parents supposed to be The Speaker 27 wealthy. The father, Pietro, refuses the offer, but the mother arranges a secret marriage, and Pietro accepts the situation. The old couple put all their property into the hands of the son-in-law and go with him to Arezzo. The marriage proves un- happy, and Guido robs and persecutes the old people until they return poor to Rome. The mother then makes the unexpected revelation that Pompiha is not her child. She had bought her, and Pietro and the world believe that she was her own. On this account they seek to recover Pom- pilia's dowry. Pompiha suffers outrageous treat- ment from her husband, who wishes to be rid of her and yet keep her property, and lays all kinds of snares in the endeavor to drive her away. She at length flees, and is aided in so doing by a noble- hearted priest. On the road they are overtaken by the husband, who starts proceedings for a divorce at Rome. The divorce is refused, but the wife is placed in mild imprisonment, though later she is allowed to return to her so-called parents, in whose home she gives birth to a son. Guido now tries to get possession of the child, as, by this means he secures all rights to the property. With some hirelings he goes to the lonely house, and murders Pompilia and her parents. Pompilia does not die immediately, but lives to give her testimony against her husband. Guido flees, is arrested on Roman territory, and is tried and condemned to death. An appeal is made to the Pope, who confirms the sentence. This story is told ten or twelve times, all interest centring in the characters of the speakers, in their points of view and attitudes of mind. More fully, perhaps, than any other poem, "The Ring and the 28 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Book" shows that every one in relating the simplest events or facts gives a coloring to the truth of his character. In Book I Browning speaks in his own char- acter, an^ states the facts and how the story came into his hands. In Book II, called "Half- Rome," a Roman, more or less in sympathy with the husband, tells the story. In Book III, styled "The Other Half- Rome," one in sympathy with the wife tells the story. In Book IV, called "Ter- tium Quid," a society gentleman, who prides him- self on his critical acumen, tells the story in a drawing-room. Each speaker in these monologues has a character of his own, and * the facts are strongly colored according to his nature and point of view. In Book V Guido makes his defence be- fore the judges. He is a criminal defending him- self, and puts facts in such a way as to justify his actions. In Book VI the priest who assisted Pom- pilia to escape passionately proclaims the lofty motives which actuated Pompilia and himself. In Book VII Pompilia, on her deathbed, gives her testimony, telling the story with intense pathos. In Book VIII a lawyer, with all the ingenuity of his profession, speaks in defence of Guido, but with- out touching upon the merits of the case. In Book IX Pompilia's advocate, endeavoring to display his fine culture,d style, gives a legal justification of her course. In Book X the Pope decides against Guido, and gives the reasons for this decision. Book XI is Guido 's last confession as a condemned man ; here his character is still more definitely un- folded. He tries to bribe his guards ; though still defiant, he shows his base, cowardly nature at the close, and ends his final weak and chaotic appeal The Speaker 29 by calling on Pompilia, thus giving the highest testimony possible to the purity and sweetness of the woman he murdered: "Don't open ! Hold me from them ! I am yours, I am the Granduke's — no, I am the Pope 's ! Abate, — Cardinal, — Christ, — Maria, — God, . . . Pompilia, will you let them murder me ? " In his defence he was conceaKng his real deeds and character, and justifying himself. In this book he reveals himself with great frankness. In Book XII the case is given as it fades into history, and the poem closes with a lesson regarding the function or necessity of art in teUing truth. "The Ring and the Book "affords perhaps the highest example of the value of the monologue as a form of art. Men who have only one point of view are always "cranks," — able, that is, to turn only one way. A preacher who can appreciMe only the point of view of his own denomination will never 'get very near the truth. The statesman who de- clares "there is but one side to a question" may sometime by his narrowness assist in plunging his country into a great war. No man can help his fellows if unable to see things from their point of view. "The Ring and the Book" shows every speaker coloring the truth unconsciously by his own character, and Browning, by putting the same facts in the mouths of different persons, enables us to discover the personal element. This is the specific function of the monologue. It artistically interprets truth by interpreting the soul that realizes it. This excites interest in the speaker and shows its dramatic character. Browning, by its aid, interprets pecuharities of 30 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue human nature before unnoticed. Dramatic in- stinct is given a new hterary form and expression. Human nature receives a profounder interpreta- tion. We are made more teachable and sym- pathetic. The monologue exhibits one person drawing quick conclusions, another meeting doubt with counter- doubt, or still another calmly weighing evidences ; it occupies many points of view, thus giving a clearer perception of truth through the mirror of human character. III. THE HEARER To comprehend the spirit of the monologue de- mands a clear conception, not only of the character of the speaker, but also of the person addressed. The hearer is often of as great importance to the meaning of a monologue as is the person speaking. It is a common blunder to consider dramatic in- stinct as concerned only with a speaker. Nearly every one regards it as the ability to "act a char- acter," to imitate the action or the speech of some particular individual. But this conception is far too narrow. The dramatic instinct is primarily concerned with insight into character, with prob- lems of imagination, and with sympathy. By it we realize another's point of view or attitude of mind towards a truth or situation, and identify ourselves sympathetically with character. Dramatic instinct is necessary to all human en- deavor. It is as necessary for the orator as it is for the actor. While it is true that the speaker must be himself and must succeed by the vigor of his The Hearer 31 own personality, and that the actor must succeed through "fideUty of portraiture," still the orator must be able not only to say the right word, but to know when he says it, and this abihty results only from dramatic instinct. The actor needs more of the personating instinct or insight into motives of character ; the speaker, more insight into the con- ditions of human thought and feeling. While one function of dramatic instinct is the ability to identify one's self with another, it is much easier to identify one's self with the speaker than with the listener. Even on the stage the most dif- ficult task for the actor is to listen in character; that is, to receive impressions from the standpoint of the character he is representing. Possibly the fundamental element in dramatic instinct is the ability to occupy a point of view, to see a truth as another sees it. This shows why dramatic instinct is the foundation of success. It enables a teache;i' to know whether his student is at the right point of view to apprehend a truth, or in the proper attitude of mind towards a subject. It tells him when he has made a truth understood. It gives the speaker power to adapt and to illustrate his truth to others, and to see things from his hearers' point of view. It gives the writer power to impress his reader. Even the business man must intuitively perceive the point of view and the mental attitude of those with whom he deals. Dramatic instinct as applied to listening on the stage, and everywhere, is apt to be overlooked. It is comparatively easy when quoting some one to stand at his point of view and to imitate his man- ner, or to contrast the differences between a number of speakers ; but a higher type of dramatic power 32 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue is exhibited in the ability to put ourselves in the place and receive the impressions of some specific type of listener. The speeches of different characters are given formally and successively in a drama. Hence, the writer of a play, or the actor, is apt to centre at- tention, when speaking, upon the character, with- out reference to the shape his thought takes from what the other character has said, and eSipeciaUy from those attitudes or actions of the other charac- ter which are not revealed by words. The same is true in the novel, and even in epic poetry. True dramatic instinct in any form demands that the speaker show not only his own thought and mo- tive by his words, but that of the character he is portraying, and the influence produced upon him at the instant by the thought and character of the listener. While the dialogue is not the only form of dra- matic art, still its study is required for the under- standing of the monologue, or almost any aspect of dramatic expression. The very name "dialogue" implies a listener and a speaker who are continually changing places. The listener indicates by his face and by actions of the body his impression, his at- tention, the effect upon him of the words of the speaker, his objection or approval. Thus he influ- ences the speaker in shaping his ideas and choosing his words. In the monologue the speaker must suggest the character of both speaker and listener and interpret the relation of one human being to another. He must show, as he speaks, the impression he receives from the manner in which his listener is affected by what he is saying. A pubhc reader, or imper- The Hearer 33 senator, of all the characters of a play must per- form a similar feat ; he must represent each char- acter not only as speaker, but show that he has just been a listener and received an impression or stimulus from another; otherwise he cannot sug- gest any true dramatic action. In the monologue, as in all true dramatic repre- sentation, the listener as well as the speaker must be realized as continuously living and thinking. The listener, though he utters not a word, must be conceived from the effect he makes upon the speaker, in order to perceive the argument as well as the situation and point of view. The necessity of realizing a listener is one of the most important points to be noted in the study of the monologue. Take, as an illustration. Brown- ing's "Incident of the French Camp." INCIDENT OF THE FRENCH CAMP You know, we French stormed Ratisbon : A mile or so away. On a little mound. Napoleon Stood on our storming day ; With neck out-thrust, you fancy how, Legs wide, arms locked behind. As if to balance the prone brow Oppressive with its mind. Just as perhaps he mused, "My plans That soar, to earth may fall. Let once my army-leader Lannes Waver at yonder wall," — Out 'twixt the battery smokes there flew A rider, -bound on bound Full galloping; nor bridle drew Until he reached the mound. 34 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Then off there flung in smiling joy, And held himself erect By just his horse's mane, a boy: You hardly could suspect — (So tight he kept his lips compressed, Scarce any blood came through) You looked twice ere you saw his breast Was all but shot in two. "Well," cried he, "Emperor, by God's grace We 've got you Ratisbon ! The Marshal's in the market-place, And you '11 be there anon To see your flag-bird flap his wings Where I, to heart's desire. Perched him ! " The Chief's eye flashed ; his plans Soared up again like fire. The Chief's eye flashed ; but presently Softened itself, as sheathes A film the mother-eagle's eye When her bruised eaglet breathes: "You're wounded!" "Nay," his soldier's pride Touched to the quick, he said : "I 'm killed. Sire ! " And, his Chief beside. Smiling the boy fell dead. I have heard prominent pubHc readers give this as a mere story without affording any definite con- ception of either speaker or hstener. In the first reading over of the poem, one may find no hint of either. But the student catches the phrase "we French," and at once sees that a Frenchman must be speaking. He soon discovers that the whole poem is colored by the feeling of some old soldier of Napoleon who was either an eye-witness of the scene or who knew Napoleon's bearing so well that he could easily picture it to his imagination. The poem now becomes a living thing, and its inter- pretation by voice and action is rendered possible. The Hearer 35 But is this all ? To whom does the soldier speak ? The listener seems entirely in the background. This is wise, because the other in telling his story would naturally lose himself in his memories and grow more or less oblivious of his hearer. But the conception of a sympathetic auditor is needed to quicken the fervor and animation of the speaker. Does not the phrase "we French" imply that the listener is another Frenchman whose patriotic en- thusiasm responds to the story .'' The short phrases, and suggestive hints through the poem, are thus explained. The speaker seems to imply that Na- poleon's bearing is well known to his listener. Cer- tainly upon the conception of such a speaker and such a hearer depends the spirit, dramatic force, and even thought of the poem. I have chosen this illustration purposely, because, of all monologues, this lays possibly the least em- phasis on a listener; yet it cannot be adequately rendered by the voice, or even properly conceived in thought, without a distinct realization of such a person. In Browning's "Rabbi Ben Ezra," the speaker is an old man. "Grow old along with me !" indi- cates this, and we feel his age and experience all through the poem. But without the presence of this youth, who must have expressed pity for the loneliness and gloom of age, the old man would never have broken forth so suddenly and so forci- bly in the portrayal of his noble philosophy of life. He expands with joy, love for his race, and rever- ence for Providence. " Grow old along with me ! " "Trust God: see all, nor be afraid !" His enthu- siasm, his exalted realization of hfe, are due to his own nobiUty of character. But his earnestness, his 36 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue vivid illustrations, his emphasis and action, spring from his efforts to expound the philosophy of life to his youthful listener and to correct the young man's one-sided views. The characters of both speaker and listener are necessary in order that one may receive an understanding of the argument. RABBI BEN EZRA Grow old along with me ! the best is yet to be, The last of life, for which the first was made : Our times are in His hand who saith, "A whole I planned, Youth shows but half; trust God: see all, nor be afraid!" Not that, amassing flowers, youth sighed, "Which rose make ours, Which lily leave and then as best recall ! " Not that, admiring stars, it yearned, "Nor Jove, nor Mars; Mine be some figured flame which blends, transcends them all ! " Not for such hopes and fears, annulling youth's brief years. Do I remonstrate ; folly wide the mark ! Rather I prize the doubt low kinds exist without. Finished and finite clods, untroubled by a spark. Poor vaunt of life indeed, were man but formed to feed On joy, to solely seek and find and feast: Such feasting ended, then as sure an end to men ; Irks care the crop-full bird? Frets doubt the maw-crammed beast ? Rejoice we are allied to That which doth provide And not partake, effect and not receive ! A spark disturbs our clod ; nearer we hold of God Who gives, than of His tribes that take, I must believe. Then, welcome each rebuff that turns earth's smoothness rough, Each sting that bids nor sit nor stand but go ! Be our joys three parts pain ! strive and hold cheap the strain ; Learn, nor account the pang ; dare, never grudge the throe ! For thence — a paradox which comforts while it mocks — Shall life succeed in that it seems to fail : What I aspired to be, and was not, comforts me; A brute I might have been, but would not sink i' the scale. The Hearer 57 What is he but a brute whose flesh hath soul to suit, Whose spirit works lest arms and legs want play ? To man, propose this test — thy body at its best. How far can that project thy soul on its lone way ? Yet gifts should prove their use : I own the past profuse Of power each side, perfection every turn : Eyes, ears took in their dole, brain treasured up the whole ; Should not the heart beat once "How good to live and learn"? Not once beat "Praise be thine ! I see the whole design, I, who saw power, see now love perfect too: Perfect I call Thy plan : thanks that I was a man ! Maker, remake, complete, — I trust what Thou shalt do ! " For pleasant is this flesh: our soul, in its rose-mesh Pulled ever to the earth, still yearns for rest : Would we some prize might hold to match those manifold Possessions of the brute, — gain most, as we did best ! Let us not always say, "Spite of this flesh to-day I strove, made head, gained ground upon the whole!" As the bird wings and sings, let us cry, "All good things Are ours, nor soul helps flesh more, now, than flesh helps soul ! " Therefore I summon age to grant youth's heritage, Life's struggle having so far reached its term : Thence shall I pass, approved a man, for aye removed From the developed brute; a God though in the germ. And I shall thereupon take rest, ere I be gone Once more on my adventure brave and new; Fearless and unperplexed, when I wage battle next. What weapons to select, what armor to indue. Youth ended, I shall try my gain or loss thereby; Leave the fire ashes, what survives is gold: And I shall weigh the same, give life its praise or blame: Young, all lay in dispute ; I shall know, being old. For note, when evening shuts, a certain moment cuts The deed off, calls the glory from the gray: A whisper from the west shoots, "Add this to the rest. Take it and try its worth : here dies another day." 38 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue So, still within this life, though lifted o'er its strife, Let me discern, compare, pronounce at last, "This rage was right ' the main, that acquiescence vain: The Future I may face now I have proved the Past." For more is not reserved to man, with soul just nerved To act to-morrow what he learns to-day ; Here, work enough to watch the Master work, and catch Hints of the proper craft, tricks of the tool's true play. As it was better, youth should strive, through acts uncouth. Toward making, than repose on aught found made; So, better, age, exempt from strife, should know, than tempt Further. Thou waitedst age ; wait death nor be afraid ! Enough now, if the Right and Good and Infinite Be named here, as thou call'st thy hand thine own. With knowledge absolute, subject to no dispute From fools that crowded youth, nor let thee feel alone. Be there, for once and all, severed great minds from small. Announced to each his station in the Past ! Was I the world arraigned, were they my soul disdained. Right ? Let age speak the truth and give us peace at last ! Now, who shall arbitrate ? Ten men love what I hate, Shun what I follow, slight what I receive ; Ten, who in ears and eyes match me: we all surmise. They this thing, and I that ; whom shall my soul believe ? Not on the vulgar mass called "work" must sentence pass, Things done, that took the eye and had the price; O'er which, from level stand, the low world laid its hand. Found straightway to its mind, could value in a trice: But all, the world's coarse thumb and finger failed to plumb. So passed in making up the main account; All instincts immature, all purposes unsure, That weighed not as his work, yet swelled the man's amount; Thoughts hardly to be packed into a narrow act. Fancies that broke through language and escaped; All I could never be, all men ignored in me. This I was worth to God, whose wheel the pitcher shaped. The Hearer 39 Ay, note that Potter's wheel, that metaphor ! and feel Why time spins fast, why passive lies our clay, — Thou, to whom fools propound, when the wine makes its round, "Since life fleets, all is change; the Past gone, seize to-day!" Fool ! All that is at all lasts ever, past recall ; Earth changes, but thy soul and God stand sure: What entered into thee, that was, is, and shall be : Time's wheel runs back or stops; potter and clay endure. He fixed thee mid this dance of plastic circumstance. This Present, thou, forsooth, wouldst fain arrest Machinery just meant to give thy soul its bent, Try thee and turn thee forth, sufficiently impressed. What though the earlier grooves which ran the laughing loves Around thy base, no longer pause and press ? What though, about thy rim, skull-things in order grim Grow out, in graver mood, obey the sterner stress? Look thou not down but up ! to uses of a cup, The festal board, lamp's flash and trumpet's peal, The new wine's foaming flow, the Master's lips a-glow ! Thou, Heaven's consummate cup, what needst thou with earth's wheel ? But I need, now as then, Thee, God, who mouldest men ; And since, not even while the whirl was worst. Did I — to the wheel of life, with shapes and colors rife. Bound dizzily — mistake my end, to slake Thy thirst ; So take and use Thy work, amend what flaws may lurk, What strain o' the stuff, what warpings past the aim ! My times be in Thy hand ! perfect the cup as planned ! Let age approve of youth, and death complete the same ! Even when the words are the same, the dehvery changes according to the peculiarities of the hearer. No one tells a story in the same way to different persons. When it is narrated to a little child, greater emphasis is placed on points ; we make longer pauses and more salient, definite pictures ; but if it is told to an educated man, the thought is 40 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue sketched more in outUne. To one who is ignorant of the circumstances many details are carefully suggested. Even the figures and illustrations are consciously or unconsciously so chosen by one with the dramatic instinct as to adapt the truth to the hstener. In "The Englishman in Italy," the story is told to a child. After the quotation, "such trifles," the Englishman speaking would no doubt laugh. The spirit of the poem is shown by the fact that it is spoken by an Englishman to a little child that is an Italian. A monologue shows the eflfect of character upon character, and hence nearly always implies the direct speaking of one person to another. In this it differs from a speech. Still, the principle applies even to the speaker. He cannot present a subject in the same way to an educated and to an unedu- cated audience, but instinctively chooses words common to him and to his iearers and finds such illustrations as make his meaning obvious to them. All language is imperfect. Truth is not made clear by being made superficial, but by the careful choos- ing of words and illustrations understood by the hearer. The speaker, accordingly, must feel his audience. The imperfection of ordinary teaching and speaking is thus explained by a form of dra- matic art. Browning says at the close of "The Ring and the Book": "Why take the artistic way to prove so much? Because, it is the glory and good of Art, That Art remains the one way possible Of speaking truth, to mouths like mine, at least. How look a brother in the face and say 'Thy right is wrong, eyes hast thou, yet art blind, The Hearer 41 Thine ears are stuffed and stopped, despite their length. And, oh, the foolishness thoU countest faith ! ' Say this as silvery as tongue can troll — The anger of the man may be endured, The shrug, the disappointed eyes of him Are not so bad to bear — but here 's the plague. That aU this trouble comes of telling truth. Which truth, by when it reaches him, looks false, Seems to be just the thing it would supplant. Nor recognizable by whom it left; JWhile falsehood would have done the work of truth. But Art, — wherein man nowise speaks to men, Only to mankind, — Art may tell a truth Obliquely, do the thing shall breed the thought, Nor wrong the thought, missing the mediate word." In "A Woman's Last Word," already explained (p. 6), the listening husband, his attitude towards his wife, his jealousy and suspicion, all serve to call forth her love and nobility of character. He is the cause of the monologue, and must be as defi- nitely conceived as the speaker. Without a clear conception of his character, her words cannot re- ceive the right interpretation. In "Bishop Blougram's Apology," the listener, Mr. Gigadibs, is definitely, though indirectly, por- trayed. He is a young man of thirty, impulsive, ideal, but has not yet struggled with the problems of life. His criticisms of Blougram are answered by that worldly-minded ecclesiastic, who can de- clare most truly the fact that an absolute faith is not possible, and then assume — and thus contra- dict himself — that to ignorant people he must preach an absolute faith. The character of the Bishop is strongly conceived, and his perception of the highest possibility of hfe, as well as his failure to carry it out, are portrayed with marvellous com- 42 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue plexity and full recognition of the diflSculties of reconciling idealism with realism. But the char- acter of his young, enthusiastic, and earnest critic, who lacks his experience and who may be par- tially silenced, is as important as the apology of Blougram. The poem is a debate between an idealist and a realist, the speech of the realist alone being given. We catch the weakness and the strength of both points of view, and thus enter into the comprehension of a most subtle struggle for self- justification. It is some distance from Bishop Blougram to Mr. Dooley, but the necessity for a listener in the mono- logue, a listener of definite character, is shown in both cases. Dooley's talks are a departure from the regular form of the monologue, in the fact that Hennessey now and then speaks a word directly ; but this partial introduction of dialogue does not change the fact that all of these talks are monologues. Such in- terruptions are not the only types of departure from the strict form of the monologue. Browning gives a narrative conclusion to " Pheidippides " and "Bishop Blougram's Apology," and many varia- tions are found among different authors. Hen- nessey's remarks may be introduced as a way of arousing in the imagination of ordinary people a conception of the listener. The relationship of the two characters is thus possibly more easily pictured to the ordinary imagination. Of the necessity of Hennessey there can be no doubt. Mr. Dooley would never speak in this way but for the sympathetic and reverently attentive Hennessey. The two are complemental and necessary to each other. The Hearer 43 Mrs. Caudle's Curtain Lectures were very pop- ular, perhaps partly because of the silence express- ing the patience of Caudle, though there were appendices that indicated remarks written down by Mr. Caudle, but long afterwards and when alone. There are some advantages in the pure form; the mind is kept more concentrated. So without Hennessey's direct remarks the picture of Dooley might have been even better sustained. The form of a monologue, however, must not be expected to remain rigid. The point here to be apprehended is the necessity of recognizing a listener as well as a speaker. Every Dooley demands a listener. He must have appreciation. These monologues are a humorous, possibly unconscious, presentation of this principle. The audience or the reader is turned by the author into a contemplative spectator of a simple situation. A play demands a struggle, but here we have all the restfulness, ease, and repose of life itself. We all like to sit back and observe, especially when a character is unfolding itseK. In the monologue as well as in the play there is no direct teaching. Things happen as in life, and we see the action of a thought upon a certain mind and do our own exhorting or preaching. The monologue adapts itself to all kinds of char- acters and to every species of theme. It does not require a plot, or even a great struggle, as in the case of the play. Attention is fixed upon one indi- vidual ; we are led into the midst of the natural situations of every- day life, and receive with great force the impressions which events, ideas, or other characters make upon a specific type of man. Eugene Field often makes children talk in mono- 44 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue logues. Some persons have criticized Field's chil- dren's poems and said they were not for children at all. This is true, and Field no doubt intended it so. He made his children talk naturally and freely, as if to each other, but not as they would talk to older people. " Jes' 'Fore Christmas " is true to a boy's charac- ter, but we must be careful in choosing a hstener. The boy would not speak in this way to an audi- ence, to the family at the dinner table, nor to any one but a confidant. He must have, in fact, a Hennessey, — possibly some other boy, or, more likely, some hired man. It is a mistake, unfortunately a common one, to give such a poem as a speech to an audience. It is not a speech, but only one end of a conversation. It is almost lyric in its portrayal of feeling, but still it concerns human action and the relations of persons to each other. Therefore, it is primarily dramatic, and a monologue. The words must be considered as spoken to some confidential listener. A proper conception of the monologue produces a higher appreciation of the work of Field. As monologues, his poems are always consistent and beautiful. When considered as mere stories for children, their artistic form has been misconceived, and interpreters of them with this conception have often failed. Even "Little Boy Blue," a decided lyric, has a definite speaker, and the objects described and the events indicated are intensely as well as dramati- cally realized. Notice the abrupt transitions, the sudden changes in feeling. It is more easily ren- dered with a slight suggestion of a sympathetic listener. The Hearer 45 Many persons regard James Whitcomb Riley's "Knee-deep in June" as a lyric; but has it enough unconsciousness for this ? To me it is far more flexible and spontaneous when considered as a monologue. The interpreter of the poem can make longer pauses. He can so identify himself with the character as to give genial and hearty laughter, and thus indicate dramatically the sudden arrival of ideas. To reveal the awakening of an idea is the very soul of spontaneous expression, and such awak- ening is nearly always dramatic. So in the follow- ing conception, what a sudden, joyous discovery can be made of "Mr. Blue Jay full o' sass. In them base-ball does o' hisn." Notice also the sudden breaks in transition that can be indicated in "Blue birds' nests tucked up there Conveniently for the boy 'at 's apt to be Up some other apple tree." Notice after "to be" how he suddenly enjoys the birds' cunning and laughs for the moment at the boys' failure. You can accentuate, too, his dra- matic feehng for May and "'bominate its prom- ises" with more decision and point. The "you" in this poem and the frequent im- peratives indicate the conception in the author's mind of a speaker and a sympathetic companion out in the fields in June. It certainly detracte from the simplicity, dramatic intensity, naturalness, and spontaneity to make of it a kind of address to an audience. The same is true of the "Liztown Humorist," "Kingsby's Mill," " Joney," and many others which are usually considered and rendered 46 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue as stories. They are monologues. Possibly a com- pleter title for them would be lyric monologues. While the interpreter of these monologues can easily turn his auditors into a sympathetic and fa- miliar group who might stand for his hstener, he can transport them in imagination to the right situ- ation; and while this is often done by interpreters with good effect, to my mind this does not change their character as monologues. Granting, however, that some of Riley's poems are more or less speeches, it must be admitted that he has written some definite and formal poems which cannot be so conceived. "Nothin' to Say," for example, is one of the most decided and formal monologues found anywhere. In this the listener NOTHIN' TO SAY Nothin' to say, my daughter ! Nothin' at all to say ! — Gyrls that 's in love, I 've noticed, ginerly has their way ! Yer mother did afore you, when her folks objected to me — Yit here I am, and here you air; and yer mother — where is she? You look lots like yer mother: Purty much same in size; And about the same complected ; and favor about the eyes : Like her, too, about her limn' here, — because she could n't stay: It '11 'most seem like you was dead — like her ! — But I hain't got nothin' to say ! She left you her little Bible — writ yer name acrost the page — And left her ear-bobs fer you, ef ever you come of age. I 've alius kep' 'em and gyuarded 'em, but ef yer goin' away — Nothin' to say, my daughter ! Nothin' at all to say ! You don't rikoUect her, I reckon ? No ; you was n't a year old then ! And now yer — how old air you? W'y, child, not "twenty I" When ? And yer nex' birthday 's in Aprile ? and you want to git married that day? ... I wisht yer mother was livin' ! — But — I hain't got nothin' to say! The Hearer 47 Twenty year ! and as good a gyrl as parent ever found . There 's a straw ketched onto yer dress there — I '11 bresh it off — turn round. (Her mother was jes' twenty when us two run away !) Nothin' to say, my daughter ! Nothin' at all to say ! can be as definitely located as the speaker. To conceal his own tears, the speaker turns or stops and pretends to brush off a straw caught on his daughter's dress. We have here in this monologue also something unusual, but very suggestive and strictly dramatic, — an aside wherein he evidently turns away from his daughter — (" Her mother was jes' twenty when us two run away.") Since the daughter is definitely located as listener and the other speeches are spoken to her, this can be given easily as a contrast, as an aside to himself, and a slight turn of the body will serve to empha- size, even as an aside often does in a play, the loca- tion of the daughter, and the speaker's relation to her. The sentiment also serves to emphasize the character of the speaker. In " Griggsby's Station " we have a most decided monologue. Who is speaking, and to whom is the monologue addressed ? Is the speaker the daugh- ter in a family suddenly grown rich, talking to her mother ? The character of the speaker and of the listener must be definitely conceived and carefully suggested in order to give truth to the rendering or even to realize its meaning. The same is true regarding many of Holman Day's stories in his "Up in Maine," and other books. With hardly any exception these are best rendered as monologues. 48 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Many of the poems of Sam Walter Foss and other popular writers of the present are mono- logues. The homelike characters demand sympa- thetic listeners, who are, by implication, of the same general type and character as the speaker. Even "The House by the Side of the Road" is better given with the spirit of the monologue. It is too personal, too dramatic, to be turned into a speech. Again, notice Mrs. Piatt's "Sometime," and a dozen examples in Webb's " Vagrom Verse" ; also "With Lead and Line along Varying Shores "; and in Oscar Fay Adams's "Sicut Patribus," where you would hardly expect monologues, you find that "At Bay " and " Conrad's Choir " have the form of monologues. Many monologues in our popular writers seem at first simple and without the formal and definite construction of those employed by Browning, yet after careful examination we feel that the concep- tion of the monologue has slowly taken possession of our writers, it may be unconsciously, and that the true interpretation of many of the most popu- lar poems demands from the reader a dramatic conception. For the comprehension of any monologue, those points where the speaker is directly affected by the hearer need especial attention. The speaker occasionally echoes the words of his hearer. Mrs. Caudle, for instance, often quotes the words of her spouse, and these were printed by Douglas Jerrold in italics and even in separate paragraphs. "For the love of mercy let you sleep ? " for example, was thus printed to emphasize the interruption by Caudle. These words would be echoed by her with affected surprise. Then she would pour out her sar- The Hearer 49 casm : " Mercy indeed ; I wish you would show a httle of it to other people." In most authors these echoed speeches are indicated by quotation marks. Browning sometimes has words in parentheses. Note "(What 'cicada'.? Pooh!)" in "A Tale." "Cicada" was certainly spoken by the listener, but the other words in the parentheses and other paren- theses in this monologue are more personal remarks by the speaker. They have reference, however, to the listener's attitude. In some cases Browning gives no indication by even quotation marks that the speaker is echoing words of the hearer. The attitude of the listener must be varied by the dramatic instinct of the reader. The grasp of the situation greatly depends upon this. It is one of the most important aspects of the dramatic instinct. ("Up at a Villa — Down in the City," see p. 65.) "Why" and "What of a Villa" certainly refers to the words, or at least the attitude, of the listener, which is realized from the manner of the speaker. In the same poem the question "Is it ever hot in the square.''" may be the echo of a word or a thought of the listener. In this case the speaker would answer it more abruptly and positively when he says, "There is a fountain to spout and splash." If, on the contrary, the thought is his own, and comes up naturally in his mind as one of the points in his description or as a result of living over his experience down in the city, he would give it less abruptly, with less force or emphasis. In general, a quotation or the echo of the words of a listener are given by the speaker with a different manner. Tennyson, though the fact is often overlooked, has written many monologues. 4 50 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Some readers give "Lady Clara Vere de Vere" as a mere story. Is there, then, no thought of the character of the yeoman who is talking with burn- ing indignation at the death of his friend ? LADY CLARA VERE DE VERE Lady Clara Vere de Vere, Of me you shall not win renown: You thought to break a country heart For pastime, ere you went to town. At me you smiled, but unbeguiled I saw the snare, and I retired : The daughter of a hundred earls. You are not one to be desired. Lady Clara Vere de Vere, I know you proud to bear your name, Your pride is yet no mate for mine. Too proud to care from whence I came. Nor would I break for your sweet sake A heart that doats on truer charms. A simple maiden in her flower Is worth a hundred coats of arms. Lady Clara Vere de Vere, Some meeker pupil you must find. For were you queen of all that is, I could not stoop to such a mind. You sought to prove how I could love. And my disdain is my reply. The lion on your old stone gates Is not more cold to you than I. Lady Clara Vere de Vere, You put strange memories in my head; Nor thrice your branching limes have blown Since I beheld young Laurence dead. Oh, your sweet eyes, your low replies : A great enchantress you may be: But there was that across his throat Which you had hardly cared to see. The Hearer 51 Lady Clara Vere de Vere, When thus he met his mother's view, She had the passions of her kind. She spake some certain truths of you. Indeed I heard one bitter word That scarce is fit for you to hear: Her manners had not that repose Which stamps the caste of Vere de Vera. Lady Clara Vere de Vere, There stands a spectre in your hall : The guilt of blood is at your door: You changed a wholesome heart to gall. You held your course without remorse. To make him trust his modest worth. And, last, you fixed a vacant stare. And slew him with your noble birth. Trust me, Clara Vere de Vere, From yon blue heavens above us bent The gardener Adam and his wife Smile at the claims of long descent. Howe'er it be, it seems to me, 'T is only noble to be good. Kind hearts are more than coronets. And simple faith than Norman blood. I know you, Clara Vere de Vere, You pine among your halls and towers : The languid light of your proud eyes Is wearied of the rolling hours. In glowing health, with boundless wealth, But sickening of a vague disease. You know so ill to deal with time, You needs must play such pranks as these. Clara, Clara Vera de Vere, If Time be heavy on your hands. Are there no beggars at your gate, Nor any poor about your lands ? Oh ! teach the orphan-boy to read, Or teach the orphan-girl to sew. Pray Heaven for a human heart, And let the foolish yeoman go. 52 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue The character of the speaker must be realized from first to last. But there is something more. Did the yeoman win or lose his case ? Does Ten- nyson give us no sign of the effect of his words upon the lady to whom his rebuke was directed ? All whom I have heard read it, cause one to think that she remains stolid, unresponsive, and cold, or else she was not really present, and the poem is a kind of lyric. But you will notice that in the last stanza the speaker drops the "Lady," and says "Clara, Clara," which certainly shows a change in feeling. There are also other indications that she was af- fected by his words, and that the speaker saw it. In the line, "You know so ill to deal with time," he may be excusing her conduct, while in the last lines he suggests how she should live to atone for the past: "Oh ! teach the orphan-boy to read, Or teach the orphan-girl to sew." He certainly would not have spoken thus if she had not by word or look shown indications of repent- ance. Truth must accomphsh its results. Art must reflect the victory of truth. We perceive the signs of victory in the very words of the poem, and the character of the speaker's expression must reflect the response in her. The reader who dra- matically or truly interprets the poem, feeling this, will show a change in feeling and movement, and give tender coloring to the closing words. Of course there is much moralizing in this and a smoother movement than in a monologue by Browning. Tennyson is not a master of the mono- logue. Some may think that Clara would never have endured this long lecture, and that it is un- natural for us to conceive of her as being really The Hearer 53 present; but, though poetry usually takes fewer words to say something than would be used in hfe, sometimes — and here possibly — it takes more. Certainly Tennyson often takes more, and this is one reason why he is not a dramatic poet. The poem, however, can be effectively rendered as a monologue, and thus receive a more adequate interpretation. There is frequently more than one listener. In "The Bishop orders his Tomb at Saint Praxed's Church," the Bishop speaks to many "sons," though he calls out Anselm especially, his chief heir, perhaps. In " The Ring and the Book " some of the speakers address the court and almost make speeches, as do the lawyers in their pleas, for in- stance. But the Pope, who acts, it will be remem- bered, as the judge, is in many cases the person addressed. The principle is the same, though the situations may diner. In every case, such a situa- tion, listener, or hsteners are chosen as will best express the character of the speaker. Notice, for example, that Pompilia tells her story on her dying bed to the sympathetic nuns, who would best call forth the points in her story. The listener is sometimes changed, or may change, positions. In Riley's "There, Little Girl, Don't Cry," the three great periods in a woman's life are portrayed, and the location of the listener must be changed to show the different situations and changes of time and place as well as the character of the listener. Long pauses and extreme varia- tions in the modulations of the voice are also neces- sary in such a transition. This poem also affords an example of the age and experience of the listener affecting expression. 54 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue In many monologues the person about whom the speaker talks is of great importance. In " The Flight of the Duchess" we almost entirely lose sight of the speaker and of the hearer, and our thought successively centres upon the Duke, on his mother, on the old crone, and, above all, on the Duchess. These characters are made to live before us, and we see the impressions they produce upon a simple, loyal heart. The beauty of this wonder- ful monologue lies in the portrayal of the honest nature of the speaker and the revelation of the im- pressions made upon him by those who have played parts in his life. The series of monologues or soliloquies styled by Browning "James Lee's Wife" were called "James Lee" in his first edition, and many feel that Browning made a mistake in changing the title; for the theme in these is the character, not of the woman who speaks so much as of the man about whom she speaks. In Browning's "CHve," the speaker, who "is by no means a Clive," according to Professor Dowden, "has to betray something of his own character and at the same time to set forth the character of the hero of his tale." Here, of course, both speaker and listener are subordinated to Clive, the person spoken of. Hence some may be tempted to think that "Clive" is a mere story. Dowden, Chesterton, and others speak of it as a story, but it has the movement, the dramatic action, the unity and spirit of a monologue. The fact that the chief character is the one about whom the speaker talks makes the poem none the less dramatic. The more "Clive" is studied, the more will the student feel that its chief theme is the contact and conflict of The Hearer 55 characters, and the more, too, will he perceive that its atmosphere and peculiarities are caused by the sense of a speaker and a listener, each of a distinct This indirect narration or suggestion is often important, but in every case it is the speaker who reflects as from a mirror impressions produced upon him by the characters of those about whom he speaks. The study of the relations of speaker and hearer requires discrimination to be made between the soliloquy and the monologue. Shakespeare's soliloquies may be thought to be unnatural. No man ever talked to his fellows as Hamlet talks when alone, and Juliet at the window is made to reveal her deepest feelings. But all love songs express what the words of the ordinary man can never reveal. All art, and especially all litera- ture, is a kind of objective embodiment of feeling or the processes of thinking. While Shakespeare's soliloquies may not seem as natural as conversa- tion, in one sense they are more natural expressions of thinking and feeling. The highest poetry may be as natural as prose, or even more natural; all depends upon the mood or theme. In all art and literature, naturalness is due not to mere external accidents, but to the truthfulness of the expression of deeper emotions of the human heart. Many feel that any representation in words of a mood or feehng is a lyric; hence they regard most monologues as lyrics. But are not Shake- speare's sohloquies dramatic? The lyric spirit gives objective form to feeling, but dramatic poetry does this in a way to show character and motives as well as moods. 56 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue To a certain extent, the lyric spirit and the dra- matic can never be completely separated. There has never been a good play that was not lyric as well as dramatic. There has never been a true lyric poem that has not revealed some trait of human character and implied certain relations of human beings to each other. It is only the pre- dominance of feeling and mood that makes a poem lyric, or the predominance of relations or conflicts of human beings that makes a passage dramatic. All the elements of poetry are inseparably united because they express living aspects of the human heart. Shakespeare's soliloquies deserve careful study as the best introduction to the deep nature of the monologue. They are objective embodiments in words of feelings and moods of which the speaker himself is only partly conscious. This is the very climax of literature, — to word what no individual ever words. In a sense, this is true of a lyric, which may interpret in the many words of a song what in life is a mere look or the hardly revealed attitude of a soul. The deepest feelings of love can never be expressed in the prose of conversation. They can be suggested only in the exalted language of poetry. These principles apply especially to the appre- ciation of a sohloquy. Of this phase of dramatic or literary art there has been but one master, and that was Shakespeare. He could make Hamlet think and feel before us without relation to another human being. He is the only author, practically, who has ever been able to portray a character entirely alone. In the great climaxes of his plays, we feel that he is dealing with the interpretation of the deepest moods and motives of life. The Hearer 61 The exclamation, "Oh, that this too, too sohd flesh would melt," after the departure of the King and the Court, reveals to us Hamlet's real condi- tion, his impression or premonition that something is wrong. We are thus prepared for the effect of the news brought by Horatio and Marcellus, be- cause his attitude has been first revealed to us by Shakespeare. Shakespeare alone could perform this marvellous feat. Again, one of the most im- portant acts closes with a soliloquy which reveals Hamlet's spirit more definitely than could be done in any other way. This soliloquy comes naturally. Hamlet drives all from him, that he may arrange the dozen lines which he wishes to add to the play. This plan has come to him while he was hstening to the actor, and must be shown by his action dur- ing the actor's speech. Hamlet, in a proper stage arrangement, is so placed as to occupy the atten- tion of the audience while the actor is reciting. The impressions produced upon him, and not the player's rehearsal, form the centre of interest. By turning away while listening to the actor, he can indicate his agitation and the action of his mind in deciding upon the plan which is definitely stated in the soliloquy and forms the culmination of the act. Notice, too, how Shakespeare makes this soHlo- quy come naturally between his dismissal of the two emissaries of the King and the writing of the addition to thg play. Hamlet's soul is laid bare. He is roused to a pitch of great excitement over the grief of the actor and his own indifference to his father's murder. Then, taking up the play, he begins to prepare his extra lines, and with this closes the most passionate of all sohloquies. 58 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Strictly speaking, a soliloquy is only a revelation of the thinking of a person entirely alone and uninfluenced by another; but a monologue im- plies thinking influenced by some peculiar type of hearer. Browning's soliloquies are practically mono- logues. We feel that the character almost " others " itself and talks to itself as if to another person. This is also natural. We know it by observing children. But it is very different from the lonely soul revealing itself in Shakespeare's soliloquies. In fact, the monologue has taken such hold upon Browning that even Pippa's soliloquies in "Pippa Passes" are practically monologues. In the "SoUloquy of the Spanish Cloister," the monk talks to himself almost as to another person, and his every idea is influenced by Brother Law- rence, whom he sees in the garden below him, but to whom he does not speak and who does not see him. SOLILOQIIX, OF THE SPANISH CLOISTER Gr-h-r — there go, my heart's abhorrence ! Water your damned flower-pots, do ! If hate killed men, Brother Lawrence, God's blood, would not mine kiU you ! What? your myrtle-bush wants trimming? Oh, that rose has prior claims — Needs its leaden vase filled brimming? Hell dry you up with its flames !«i At the meal we sit together: Solve tibi! I must hear Wise talk of the kind of weather. Sort of season, time of year: The Hearer Not a plenteous eork-erop: scarcely Dare we hope oak-galls, I doubt: What's the Latin name for "parsley" ? What 's the Greek name for Swine's Snout ? Whew ! We 'II have our platter burnished. Laid with care on our own shelf ! With a fire-new spoon we 're furnished, And a goblet for ourself , Rinsed like something sacrificial Ere 't is fit to touch our chaps — Marked with L for our initial ! (He-he ! There his lily snaps !) Saint, forsooth ! While brown Dolores Squats outside the Convent bank With Sanchicha, telling stories, Steeping tresses in the tank, Blue-black, lustrous, thick like horsehairs, — Can't I see his dead eye glow. Bright as 't were a Barbary corsair's ? ^hat is, if he 'd let it show !) When he finishes refection, Knife and fork he never lays Cross-wise, (o my recollection, As do I, in Jesu's praise. I the Trinity illustrate. Drinking watered orange-pulp — In three sips the Arian frustrate; While he drains his at one gulp. Oh, those melons ? If he 's able We 're to have a feast : so nice ! One goes'^o the Abbot's table. All of us get each a slice. How go on your flowers ? None double ? Not one fruit-sort can you spy ? Strange ! — And I, too, at such trouble Keep them close-nipped on the sly ! 59 6o Browning and the Dramatic Monologue There 's a great text in Galatians, Once you trip on it, entails Twenty-nine distinct damnations. One sure, if another fails : If I trip him just a-dying. Sure of heaven as sure can be. Spin him round and send him flying Off to hell, a Manichee ? Or, my scrofulous French novel On gray paper with blunt type ! Simply glance at it, you grovel Hand and foot in^Belial's gripe: If I double down its pages At the woeful sixteenth print. When he gathers his greengages. Ope a sieve and slip it in't? Or, there 's Satan ! — one might venture Pledge one's soul to him, yet leave Such a flaw in the indenture As he 'd miss, till, past retrieve. Blasted lay that rose-acacia We 're so proud of ! Hy, Zy, Hine . . . 'St, there 's Vespers ! Plena gratid Ave, Virgol Gr-r-r — you swine ! In this "soUloquy" we have, in a few lines, possibly the strongest interpretation of hypocrisy in literature. The soliloquy begins with the speaker's accidental discovery of the kindly-hearted monk, Brother Lawrence, attending to his flowers in the court below, and the sight causes an explo- sion of rage. So intense is his feeling that, in his imagination, he talks directly to Brother Lawrence. Note, for example, such suggestions as, " How go on your flowers.-^" Of course. Brother Lawrence knows nothing of the speaker's presence; that worthy, with gusto, answers his own questions to himself. The Hearer 6i Notice also the abrupt transitions. Browning, even in his soliloquies, often introduces events. "There his lily snaps !" is given with sudden glee as the speaker discovers the accident. The difference between Browning and Shake- speare may be still more clearly conceived. " Shake- speare," says some one, "makes his characters live; Browning makes histbink." Shakespeare reveals character by making a man think alone, or, in contact with others, act. '^^tOHning fixes- our at- tention upon an individual, and shows us what he is by making him think, and usually he sug- gests the cause of the thinkine in some relation to objects, events, or characters^' The situation in every case is most favorable t<5 the expression of thought and feeling, and of deeper motives^ The chief difference between Shakespeare and'Brown- ing is the difference between a play and a mono- logue. The point of view of the two men is not the same, and we must appreciate that of both. Browning's "Saul" may be regarded as a soUlo- quy. David is alone. Browning's words here help us to an appreciation of his peculiar kind of soliloquy. "Let me tell out my tale to its ending — my voice to my heart Which can scarce dare believe in what marvels last night I took part. As this morning I gather the fragments, alone with my sheep. And still fear lest the terrible glory evanish like sleep ! " "My voice to my heart" is very suggestive. JBlg wning always made his spe aker,^ jwheo— alcJn e, talkto himself. He divides the personality of the -4ftdividutdr much more than did Shakespeare. Shakespeare simply makes a man think aloud, while Browning almost makes consciousness dual. 62 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Some one may ask, — Why not take any story or lyric and give it directly to an imaginary hstener, and only indirectly to the audience ? This is exactly what should be done in some cases. Who can declaim as a speech or as if to an audience "John Anderson, my Jo," or "The Lover's Appeal," and not feel the situation to be ludicrous ? Some of the tenderest lyric poems should be given as though to an imaginary auditor somewhat to one side. As the lyric is subjective, the turning to one side is a help to the subjective sympathetic condition, especially in cases where the words of the lyric are supposed to be addressed to some in- dividual character. It is very diflBcult for readers to speak to an audience directly and not pass into the oratorio attitude of mind. A little turn to the side, when simple, suggests the indirect nature of a poem. It gives power to change atten- tion and suggests degrees of subjectivity, and thus tends to prevent the true spirit of the poem from being destroyed by oratorical or declamatory effects. Perhaps Charles Lamb's famous saying, that recitation perverts a beautiful poem, would have been qualified had some poem been read to him with full recognition of its artistic character. The poem is not a speech, but a work of art, and the speaker must be clearly conceived, his emotion sym- pathetically realized, and given, not to an audience, but to an imaginary listener ; thus all the delicacy and tenderness may be truthfully revealed and declamation and unnaturalness avoided. In general, every kind of literature can be ade- quately rendered aloud. The true spirit of those The Hearer 63 poems that have been considered unadapted to such rendering can possibly be shown by the voice if we find the real situation, and do not try to give the words the directness of an oration or a lesson, or the objectivity of a play. When a story or a poem can be made more nat- ural and more effective by being conceived as spoken by a character of a definite type to a definite type of hearer, it should usually be regarded as a monologue. Readers who picture not only the peculiar character speaking, but the person to whom he speaks, will receive and give a more ade- quate impression, one more dramatic, more simple, and far more expressive of character than those who confuse it with a lyric or a story. Dramatic art, in fact all art, is indirect, except in some forms of speaking. The true orator or speaker, however, while having a direct purpose, never directly commands or dominates his audi- ence. Every true artist, painter, musician, or even orator, simply awakens the faculties and powers of others, and leads men to decide for themselves. The true speaker should appeal to imagination and reason, and not attempt to force men to accept his ideals and convictions. That would be domina- tion, not oratory. True art is on the rational basis of kinship of nature. Faculty awakens faculty, vision quickens vision. No hard and fast line can be drawn between the arts, even between the oration and the monologue. But the oration is more direct, more conscious ; speaker and listener understand, as a rule, exactly the purpose and the intention. The monologue, on the contrary, is indirect. Its interpreter en- deavors faithfully to portray human nature. He 64 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue reveals the impressions produced upon him instead of endeavoring directly to produce a specific im- pression upon an audience. The conception of the listener in the monologue is different from that of the listener in the oration. In every monologue, the interpreter shows the con- tact of a speaker with a hstener and conveys a definite impression made upon him by each. He especially conveys, not only his identification with the character speaking, but that character's mental or conversational attitude towards another human being and the unconscious variation of mental action resulting from such a relationship. IV. PLACE OR SITUATION Whether or not we agree with the ancient rules of the unities regarding place, time, and action as laws of the drama, every one must recognize the fact that all three conceptions are in some sense necessary to an illusion. A dramatic action or position implies not only character, but specific location and circumstance. The situation helps to reveal the character and shows its relation to human life. Therefore, dramatic effect implies more than contact of different characters. It is concerned with such a placing of the characters as will reveal something of motives. Two men may meet continually in society or in the ordinary and conventional relations of business and the peculiar characteristics of neither may ever be revealed. Steel and flint may lie passively side by side or may be frozen in the same ice without Place or Situation 65 any suggestion of heat. The steel must strike the flint suddenly to bring forth a spark of fire. In the same way, character must collide with character in such a situation, such a conflict of interests, such opposite determinations or ambitions, as will cause a revelation of motives and dispositions. Steel and flint illustrate character. The stroke is the situation, the spark the dramatic result. Place, accordingly, is often of great importance in dra- matic art. The monologue is no exception to this. The reader must definitely imagine not only a speaker and a listener, but also a location or situation. From a dramatic point of view, situation is perhaps more necessary to a monologue than to a play. Without a situation, nothing can be dramatic. In Browning's "Up at a Villa — Down in the City," is the speaker located in the city, at the villa, or at some point between the two ? UP AT A VILLA — DOWN IN THE CITY (as DISTINGTJISHED by an ITALIAN PERSON OP QUALITt) Had I but plenty of money, money enough and to spare, The house for me, no doubt, were a house in the city-square; Ah, such a life, such a life, as one leads at the window there ! Something to see, by Bacchus, something to hear, at least ! There, the whole day long, one's life is a perfect feast; While up at a villa one lives, I maintain it, no more than a beast. Well now, look at our villa ! stuck like the horn of a bull Just on a mountain's edge as bare as the creature's skull, Save a mere shag of a bush with hardly a leaf to pull ! — I scratch my owii, sometimes, to see if the hair 's turned wool. But the city, oh the city — the square with the houses ! '^y ? They are stone-faced, white as a curd, there 's something to take the eye! 6 66 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Houses in four straight lines, not a single front awry ! You watch who crosses and gossips, who saunters, who hurries by: Green blinds, as a matter of course, to draw when the sun gets high ; And the shops with fanciful signs which 3,re painted properly. What of a villa ? Though winter be over in March by rights, 'T is May perhaps ere the snow shall have withered well off the heights. You 've the brown ploughed land before, where the oxen steam and wheeze, And the hills over-smoked behind by the faint gray olive-trees. Is it better in May, I ask you ? you 've summer all at once ; In a day he leaps complete with a few strong April suns ! 'Mid the sharp short emerald wheat, scarce risen three fingers well, The wild tulip, at end of its tube, blows out its great red bell Like a thin clear bubble of blood,'for the children to pick and sell. Is it ever hot in the square ? There 's a fountain to spout and splash ! In the shade it sings and springs ; in the shine such foam-bows flash On the horses with curling fish-tails, that prance and paddle and Round the lady atop in the conch — fifty gazers do not abash. Though all that she wears is some weeds round her waist in a sort of sash ! All the year long at the villa, nothing's to see though you linger. Except yon cypress that points like Death's lean lifted forefinger. Some think fireflies pretty, when, they mix in the corn and mingle Or thrid the stinking hemp till the stalks of it seem a-tingle. Late August or early September, the stunning cicala is shrill. And the bees keep their tiresome whine round the resinous firs on the hill. Enough of the seasons, — I spare you the months of the fever and chill. Ere you open your eyes in the city, the blessed church-beUs begin: No sooner the bells leave off, than the diligence rattles in : You get the pick of the news, and it costs you never a pin. By and by there 's the travelling doctor gives pills, lets blood, draws teeth ; Or the Pulcinello-trumpet breaks up the market beneath. At the post-office such a scene-picture — , the new play, piping hot ! And a notice how, oidy this morning, three liberal thieves were shot. Place or Situation 67 Above it, behold the Archbishop's most fatherly of rebukes, And beneath, with his crown and his lion, some little new law of the Duke's ! Or a sonnet with flowery marge, to the Reverend Don So-and-so" Who is Dante, Boccaccio, Petrarca, Saint Jerome, and Cicero, "And moreover," (the sonnet goes rhyming,) "the skirts of Saint Paul has reached. Having preached us those six Lent-lectures more unctuous than ever he preached." Noon strikes, — here sweeps the procession ! our Lady borne smil- ing and smart With a pink gauze gown all spangles, and seven swords stuck in her heart! Bang, whang, whang, goes the drum, tootle-te-tootle the fife; No keeping one's haunches still : it 's the greatest pleasure in life. But bless you, it 's dear — it 's dear ! fowls, wine, at double the rate. They have clapped a new tax upon salt, and what oil pays passing the gate It 's a horror to think of. And so, the villa for me, not the city ! Beggars can scarcely be choosers : but still — ah, the pity, the pity ! Look, two and two go the priests, then the monks with cowls and sandals. And the penitents dressed in white shirts, a-holding the yellow candles. One, he carries a flag up straight, and another a cross with handles. And the Duke's guard brings up the rear, for the better prevention of scandals. Bang, whang, whang, goes the drum, tootle-te-tootle the fife. Oh, a day in the city-square, there is no such pleasure in life ! Of course, there are arguments in favor of plac- ing the "person of quality" in the city near his beloved objects. One of the last lines, beginning "Look, two and two go the priests," seems to imply the discovery and actual presence of the proces- sion. But if Browning had located the speaker in the city, would he not say "here" and not "there," as he does at the end of the third line ? 68 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue If at the villa, why does he say to his listener, " Well, now, look at our villa! " The fact that he points to it and says, "stuck like the horn of a bull Just on a mountain's edge," seems to imply, though in plain sight of it, that he is some distance away. Again, if at the viUa, how can he discover the procession? Was the monologue spoken during a walk ? We can easily imagine the "person of quahty " and his companion starting from the villa and talking while coming down into the city. But this is hardly pos- sible, because when Browning changes his situation in this way, he always suggests definitely the stages of the journey. He never makes a mistake regard- ing the location or situation of his characters. His conceptions are so dramatic that he is always con- sistent regarding his characters and the situations or points of view they occupy. However obscure he may be in other points, he never confuses time and place or dramatic situation. Is it not best to imagine him as having walked out with a friend to some point where the villa above and the city below are both clearly visible? And as the humor of the monologue consists in the impressions which the two places make upon the speaker, the contrasts are sharp and sudden. In such a position we can distinctly realize him now looking with longing towards the city that he loves and then turning with disgust and contempt towards the villa he despises. Possibly his listener is located on the side towards the villa, as that unknown and almost unnoticed personage seems once or twice, at least, to make a Place or Situation 69 mild defence. That his listener does not wholly agree with him, is indicated by "Why ?" at the end of the eleventh line, to which he replies, heaping encomiums upon the city, careless of the fact that his arguments would make any lover of beauty smile : " Houses in four straight lines." "And the shops with fanciful signs which are painted properly." "What of a villa?" may also be an echo of the listener's question or remark, or apply to a look ex- pressive of his attitude of mind. "Is it ever hot in the square ? " suggests some satire on his part. The listener, however, is barely noticed, as the speaker seems to scorn the slightest opposition or expression of opinion. In such a position, we can easily imagine him with the whole city at his feet in sufficiently plain view to allow him to discover enough of the pro- cession to waken memory and enthusiasm, and bring all up as a present reality. The procession can be easily imagined as starting from some con- vent outside the walls and appearing below them on its way to town. All the facts of the procession need not be discovered. It is a scene he has often observed and delighted in, and distance would lend enchantment to the speaker and serve as the climax of his Enthusiasm, as he portrayed to his less re- sponsive^ friend the details of the procession. Some of his references to both villa and city are certainly from memory. For example, the different sights and sounds that he has seen and heard from time to time in the city, such as the "diligence," the "scene-picture at the post- office." The spirit of the monologue, the enthusiasm and 70 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue exultation over what gives anything but pleasure to others, requires such a character as will enjoy "the travelling doctor " who "gives pills, lets blood, draws teeth." Notice Browning's touch for the reformers, he makes such a man rejoice at the news, "only this morning three liberal thieves were shot." The "liberal thieves" are doubtless three Italian reformers who had been trying to deliver their country. It is possible to imagine the pro- cession as wholly from memory, and " noon strikes " to be simply a part of his imagination and ex- ultation. How gaily he skips as our Lady, the Madonna, is "borne smiliDg and smart, With a pink gauze gown all spangles, and seven swords stuck in her heart!" He has no conception of the symbol of the seven deadly sins, but dances away at the music, " No keeping one's haunches still." Later, however, when he exclaims to his hstener, "Look," he seems to make an actual discovery. Does he start as he actually sees a procession in the distance? A real one coming before him would give life and variety to the monologue. Browning intentionally leaves the conceptions gradually to dawn in the imagination. The doubts, and the questions which may be asked, have been dwelt upon in order to emphasize the point that the speaker must be con- ceived in a definite situation. When once a situ- ation is located, this will modify some of the shades of feeling and expression. The point, then, is, that a reader or interpreter must conceive the speaker as occupying a definite place, and when this is done, the position will de- termine somewhat the feeling and the expression. Place or Situation 71 Diflference in situation causes many diflPerences in action and in voice modulations. Whatever loca- tion, therefore, the reader decides upon, every- thing else must be consistent with it. One point in this monologue may be especially obscure, where reference is made to the city being "dear !" "fowls, wine, at double the rate." I was one of three in a carriage who were once stopped at a gate in Florence and examined to see whether we carried any "salt," "oil," or anything on which there was a tax, which, according to the owner of the villa, "is a horror to think of." Some Italian cities do not have free trade with the surrounding country; food stuffs are taxed upon "passing the gate," thus making life in the city more expen- sive. And here is the reason why this man sadly mourns : "And so, the villa for me, not the city ! Beggars can scarcely be choosers: but still — ah, the pity, the pity ! " Whatever may be said regarding Browning's obscurity, however far he may have gone into the most technical knowledge of science in any depart- ment of life, however remote his allusions to events or objects or lines of knowledge which are unfamil- iar to the world, there is one thing about which he is always definite, possibly more definite than any other writer. In every monologue we can find an indication of the place or situation in which the monologue is located. Browning has given us one monologue which takes place during a walk, "A Grammarian's Funeral." The speaker is one of the band carry- ing the body of his master from the "common crofts," and so he is represented as looking up to 72 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue the top of the hill and talking about the appro- priateness of burying the master on the hilltop. Browning's intimate knowledge of Greek was shown by the phrase "gave us the doctrine of the enclitic De." The London " Times " criticized this severely when the poem was published, saying that with all respect to Mr. Browning, there was no such enclitic. Browning answered in a note that proved his fine scholarship, and called attenton to the fact that this was the point in dispute which the gram- marian had tried to settle. Even the stages of the journey are shown, "Here's the town-gate reached: there's the market-place Gaping before us." In another place he says, "Caution redoubled, Step two abreast, the way winds narrowly ! " while all the time he pours out his tribute to his master : "Oh, if we draw a circle premature Heedless of far gain. Greedy for quick returns of profit, sure Bad is our bargain ! . . . That low man seeks a little thing to do, Sees it and does it: This high man, with a great thing to pursue, Dies ere he knows it. That low man goes on adding one to one, His hundred 's soon hit : This high man, aiming at a million. Misses an unit. That, has the world here — should he need the next, Let the world mind him ! This, throws himself on God, and unperplexed Seeking, shall find him." Place or Situation 73 Then, when they arrive at the top, he says, "Well, here's the platform, here's the proper place," and addressing the birds, "All ye highfliers of the feathered race," he continues, giving his thoughts, as suggested by the very situation: "This man decided not to Live but KJaow — Bury this man there ? Here, here 's his place, where meteors shoot, clouds form, Lightnings are loosened, Stars come and go ! Let joy break with the storm. Peace let the dew send ! Lofty designs must close in like effects: _ Loftily lying. Leave him, still loftier than the world suspects. Living and dying." Browning's "At the 'Mermaid'" reproduces a scene of historic interest. The inn where Shake- speare, Ben Jonson, and other sympathetic friends used to meet, is presented to the imagination, and Shakespeare is the speaker. Some one has pro- posed a toast to him as the next poet. Shakespeare protests, and the poem is his answer. Here are shown his modesty, his optimism, his reverence, and his noble views of life. He smilingly points to his works and talks about them to these his friends in a simple, frank way. "Look and tell me! Written, spoken. Here 's my lifelong work : and where — Where 's your warrant or my token I 'm the dead king's son and heir ? "Here's my work: does work discover — What was rest from work — my life ? Did I live man's hater, lover ? Leave the world at peace, at strife ? . . . 74 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue "Blank of such a record, truly, Here 's the work I hand, this scroll. Yours to take or leave; as duly, , Mine remains the unproffered soul. So much, no whit more, my debtors — How should one like me lay claim To that largest elders, betters Sell you cheap their souls for — fame ? . . . "Have you found your life distasteful? My life did, and does, smack sweet. Was your youth of pleasure wasteful ? Mine I saved and hold complete. Do your joys with age diminish ? When mine fail me, I '11 complain. Must in death your daylight finish ? My sun sets to rise again. . . . "My experience being other. How should I contribute verse Worthy of your king and brother ? Balaam-like I bless, not curse. I find earth not gray, but rosy. Heaven not grim, but fair of hue. Do I stoop ? I pluck a posy. Do I stand and stare ? AH 's blue. . . . "Meanwhile greet me — 'friend, good fellow. Gentle Will,' my merry men ! As for making Envy yellow With 'Next Poet'— (Manners. Ben!)" It is difficult to imagine any other situation, any other place, any other group of friends, chosen by Browning, that would have been more favorable to the frank unfolding by Shakespeare of the motives which underlie his work and his character. This any one may recognize, whatever his opinions may be regarding the success of this monologue. The poem is meaningless without a grasp of the situation. "Manners, Ben !" at the close is a pro- Place or Situation 75 test against Ben's drinking too soon. Is this a delicate hint at Ben's habits ? Or was his beginning to drink a method by which Browning suggests a comment of Ben's to the effect that Shakespeare talked too much ? Browning here brings out the true Shakespeare spirit, not, of course, to the satisfaction of those who have their hobbies and systems and consider Shakespeare the only poet, but to others who wish to comprehend the real man. Douglas Jerrold has indicated the situation of his series of monologues in the title, " Mrs. Caudle's Curtain Lectures." The mind easily pictures an old-fashioned bed, the draperies drawn around it, with Mr. and Mrs. Caudle retired to rest. Mrs. Caudle seizes this moment when she has her busy spouse at her mercy. Before she falls asleep, she refers to his various shortcomings and fully dis- cusses future contingencies or consequences of his evil deeds as a kind of slumber song for poor Caudle. The imagination distinctly sees Caudle holding himself still, trying to go to sleep. No word can reheve the tension of his mind, and Mrs. Caudle monopolizes all the conversation. Caudle is exercising those powers which Epictetus says that " God has given us by which we can keep ourselves calm and reposeful, as Socrates did, without change of face under the most trying circumstances." A study of any monologue will furnish an illustra- tion of situation, but we are naturally, in the study of the subject, led back again to Browning. In his "Andrea del Sarto," we are introduced to a scene common in the lives of artists. It has grown too dark to paint, and, dropping his brush, the painter sits in the gray twilight and talks with 76 Browning and the Dramatic Monoi his wife, who serves him as a model, and muses over his work and his Hfe. No one can fully appreciate the poem who has not been in a studio at some such moment when the artist stopped work and came out of his absorption to talk to those dear to him. At such a time the artist will be personal, will criti- cize himself severely, and throw out hints of what he has tried to do, of his higher aims, visions, and possibiUties, and, while showing appreciation of what other artists have said of him, will recognize, also, the mistakes and failures of his art or life. It is the Unfolding of a sensitive soul, a transition from a world of ideals, imaginations, and visions, to one of reality. Nowhere else in poetry has any author so fully caught the essence of such an hour. Nowhere else can there be found art criticism equal to this self- revelation of the artist who is called "the faultless Eainter." What a revelation ! What might he ave done ! What has he been ! What a woman is beside him, his greatest curse, but one whose willing slave he recognizes himself to be ! What a weak acquiescence, and what a fall ! Notice also the abrupt beginning: "But do not let us quarrel any more." She is asking ostensibly for money for her "cousin," but really, to pay the gambling debts of one of her lovers. He grants her request, but pleads that she stay with him in his loneliness and promises to work harder, and again and again in his criticism of himself, of his very perfection, even while he shows Raphael's weak- ness in drawing, he hints that there is something in the others not in him. In fact, he recognizes one of the deepest principles of life, as well as art, and exclaims. Place or Situation 77 "Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp, Or what 's heaven for ? All is silver-gray. Placid and perfect with my art : the worse ! " He reveals his deep grief, how he dare not venture abroad all day lest the French nobles in the city should recognize him and deal with him for having used for himself — or rather for his wife, to build her a house, at her entreaty — the money which had been given by Francis for the purchase of pic- tures and for his return to Paris. And yet we find a weak soul's acquiescence in fate — "All is as God o'errules." How sympathetically does Browning reproduce the painter's point of view in — "... why, there's my picture ready made. There 's what we painters call our harmony ! A common grayness silvers everything, — All in a twilight." Or again: "... let me sit The gray remainder of the evening out." While this poem is recognized as a great art criticism, its spirit can be realized only by one recognizing the dramatic situation and appreciat- ing the delicate suggestions of the atmosphere of a studio and of time and place in relation to an artist's life. One of the finest situations in Browning's verse is that in "La Saisiaz." The poet has an appoint- ment to chmb a mountain with one of his friends, a Miss Smith, daughter of one of the firm of Smith, Elder & Co., but when the time comes, she is dead. The other, himself, keeps the appointment, walks 78 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue up alone, and pausing on the height, utters aloud his reflections upon the immortahty of the soul. The poem is none the less a monologue because it is Browning himself that speaks, and because the friend of whom and to whom he speaks has just passed to the unseen world. She whom he had ex- pected as his companion in this chmb is so near to him as to be almost hterally reahzed as a Ustener. The poem fulfils the conditions of a monologue: a living soul intensely reaUzing a thought and situa- tion with relation to another soul. It is hardly possible to exaggerate the importance of situation in art. It is the situation that gives us the background. An isolated object can hardly be made the subject of a work of art. Art is relation, and shows the kinship of things. "It is where the bird is," said Hunt, "that makes the bird." V. TIME AND CONNECTION The monologue touches only indirectly the pro- gressive development of character as regards time. It deals with only one instant, the present, which reflects the past and the future. But for this very reason its aspect differs from that of the drama, since it focuses attention upon the instant and re- veals motives, possibilities, and even results. The monologue is not "still-life" in any sense of the word. In an instant's flash it may show the turn- ing point of a life. The most important words in the study of a mon- ologue are usually the first. As a monologue is a sudden vision of a life, it of course breaks into the Time and Connection 79 continuity of thought or discussion. The first words are nearly always spoken in answer to some- thing previously said or in reference to some event or circumstance which is only suggested, yet which must be definitely imagined. One of the most im- portant questions for the student to settle is the connection of what is printed with what is not printed. When does a character begin to speak, that is, in answer to what, — as a result of what event, act, or word ? For this reason the first words of a monologue must usually be delivered slowly and emphatically, if auditors are to be given a clue to the processes of the thought. The inflections and other modula- tions pf the voice in uttering the first words must always directly suggest the connection with what precedes. "Ralbbi Ben Ezra" begins abruptly : " Grow old along with me ! " This poem has already been dis- cussed with reference to the necessity of conceiv- ing the listener, but we must also apprehend the thought which the listener has uttered before we can get the speaker's point of view. The young man has, no doubt, expressed pity or regret for the old man's isolation, for the loss of all his friends, and must have remarked something about how gloomy a thing it is to grow old. This is the cause of the older man's outburst of joyous expostulation amounting almost to a rebuke. Now the reader must realize this, must make it appear in the em- phasis which he gives to the first words of the Rabbi : that is, he must so render these words as to bring the ideas of the Rabbi in opposition to those of the young man. The antithesis to what has been said or implied gives the keynote of the poem, whether 8o Browning and the Dramatic Monologue we are mterpreting it to another or^endfia Eoring t o linderstaiid it for ourselves. / ^^^--v.,^ We perceive here a striking contrast between the dramatic monologue and the story. The story may begin, "Once upon a time," but the monologue as a part of real Ut'e must suggest a direct continuity of thought and also of contact with human beings. Even a play may introduce characters, gradually lead up to a collision, and make emphatic an out- break of passion, but the monologue must, as a rule, break in at once with the specific answer of a defi- nite character in a living situation to a definite thought which has been uttered by another. The reader must receive an impression of the character at the moment, but in relation to a continuous succession of ideas. Accordingly, the right starting of the monologue is of vital importance. In a story we often wait a long while for it to unfold. But except in the first preliminary reading, one cannot read on in the monologue, hoping that the meaning will gradually become clear. When a reader fully understands the meaning, he must turn and express this at the very beginning. The very first phrase must be colored by the whole. Frequently the settling of the connection of the thought is the most difficult part in the study of a monologue, yet, on account of the unique difference of this type of literature from a story and other literary forms, the study of the beginning is apt to be overlooked. The reader must first find out where he is. I was once in search of Bishopsgate Street in London, and meeting, in a very narrow part of a narrow street a unique old man, who re- minded me of Ralph Nickleby, I asked him to tell Time and Connection 8i me the way. He looked me straight in the eye and said, "Where are you now ? " I told him I thought I was in Threadneedle Street. "Right," and then he pointed out the street, which was only a few steps away, but which I had been seeking for some time in vain. He was wise, for unless I knew where I was, he could not direct me. In the study of a monologue, if we will find ex- actly where we are, many difficult questions will be settled at once ; and the interpreter by pausing and using care can make clear, through the emphatic interpretation of the first sentences, a vast num- ber of points which would otherwise be of great difficulty. Mr. Macf adyen has well said, " Much of the ap- parent obscurity of Browning is due to his habit of climbing up a precipice of thought, and then kicking away the ladder by which he climbed." The opening of Browning's "Fra Lippo Lippi" requires a conception of night and a sudden sur- prise — "I am poor brother Lippo, by your leave! You need not clap your torches to my face. Zooks, what 's to blame ? you think you see a monk ! " These words cannot be given excitedly or dra- matically without reahzing the role the police are playing, their rough handling of Lippo, and their discovery that they have seized a monk at an un- seemly hour of the night and not in a respectable Eart of the city. We must identify ourselves with lippo and feel the torches of the police in the face, and the hand " fiddling " on his throat. This whole situation must be as definitely conceived as if a part of a play. The reference to "Cosimo of the 82 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Medici" should be spoken very suggestively, and we should feel with Lippo the consequent relief that resulted, and the dismay also of the police on find- ing they have in hand an artist friend of the greatest man in Florence. "Boh ! you were best !" means that the hands of the policeman have been released from his throat. All this dramatic action, however, must be sec- ondary to the conception of the character of the monk-painter. Almost immediately, in the very midst of the excitement, possibly with reference to the very fellow who had grasped his throat, the artist, with the true spirit of a painter, exclaims, "He's Judas to a tittle, that man is! Just such a face ! " and as the chief of the squad of police sends his watchmen away, the painter's heart once more awakes and discovers a picture, and he says, almost to himself: " I'd like his face — His, elbowing on his comrade in the door With the pike and lantern, — for the slave that holds John Baptist's head a-dangle by the hair With one hand ('Look you, now,' as who should say) And his weapon in the other, yet unwiped ! It's not your chance to have a bit of chalk, A wood-coal or the like ? or you should see ! Yes, I 'm the painter, since you style me so. What, brother Lippo's doings, up and down. You know them, and they take you ? like enough ! I saw the proper twinkle in your eye — 'Tell you, I liked your looks at very first. Let's sit and set things straight now, hip to haunch." Thus the monologue is introduced, and with a cap- tain of a night-watch in Florence as listener, this Time and Connection 83 great painter, who tried to paint things truly, pours out his critical reflections, — "A fine way to paint soul, by painting body So ill, the eye can't stop there, must go further And can't fare worse ! " This great reformer in art is made by Browning to declare why men should paint "God's works — paint anyone, and count it crime To let a truth slip by," for according to this man, who initiated a new movement in art, "Art was given for that; God uses us to help each other so, Lending our minds out. . . . This world 's no blot for us Nor blank; it means intensely, andtneans good: To find its meaning is my meat and drink." This monologue, while only a fragment of sim- ple conversation, touches those profound moments which only an artist can realize, and unfolds the real essence of a character. Abrupt beginnings are very common in mono- logues, but the student will find that these are often the easiest to master. They can be easily inter- preted by dramatic instinct. There is always a situation, dramatic in proportion to the abruptness of the beginning, and a few glances will fasten at- tention upon the real theme. The monologue will never stir one who desires long preliminary chapters of descriptions before the real story is opened, but one with true dramatic imagination can easily make a sudden plunge into the very midst of life and action. 84 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue The unity of time on account of the momentary character of a monologue needs no discussion. And yet we find in one otherwise strong monologue, "Before Sedan," by Austin Dobson, a strange violation of the principle of time. BEFORE SEDAN "the dead hand clasped a lettek." Hehe, in this leafy place, Quiet he lies, Cold, with his sightless face Turned to the skies; 'T is but another dead ; All you can say is said. Carry his body hence, — Kings must have slaves; Kings climb to eminence Over men's graves: So this man's eye is dim ; — Throw the earth over him. What was the white you touched. There, at his side ? Paper his hand had clutched Tight ere he died ; — Message or wish, maybe ; — Smooth the folds out and see. Hardly the worst of us Here could have smiled : — Only the tremulous Words of a child; — Prattle, that has for stops Just a few ruddy drops. Look. She is sad to miss. Morning and night, His — her dead father's — kiss ; Tries to be bright. Time and Connection 85 Good to mamma, and sweet, That is all. " Marguerite." Ah, if beside the dead Slumbered the pain ! Ah, if the hearts that bled Slept with the slain ! If the grief died ; — but no ; — Death wUl not have it so. The title of this monologue suggests something of the situation, and from the first sentence we gather that it is spoken by one searching for the dead in remote nooks of the battle-field. From the remarks against war, the speaker seems to be one of the citizens searching their farms for any who, wounded, have crawled away for water, or have died in an obscure corner. A body is found, and something white, a paper, in the soldier's hand, is discovered ; the leader, who is the speaker, asks another to smooth out the folds, as it may express some dying wish. It is found to be a letter from his child, which the dying man has taken out and kissed. All this is in the true spirit of the monologue. But now we come to a blem- ish, — "could have smiled." So far, all has been in the present tense, dramatically discovered and represented as a living, passing scene; but here there is a relapse into mere narration, and the speaker appears to be telling the story long afterwards. We never have such a blemish in a production of Browning's. In his hands the monologue is always a present, living, moving thing. It is not a narra- tive of some past action. All dramatic art is related to time^^but the only time in which we can act is the present. This fact 86 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue is a help to the understanding of the monologue, for we must bring a living character into immediate action and contact with some other, or with many other, human beings. VI. ARGUMENT To comprehend the meaning of a monologue, it is necessary to grasp, fully and clearly, the relation of the ideas, or the continuity of thought. In an essay or speech, the argument is everything, and even a story depends upon a sequence of events. Many persons object to the monologue because the full^omprehension of the me anin g^can only c^m F last, and seem to thinlnhatTHe^characters and situ- ations should be mere accidents. Mr. Chesterton has well said: "If a man comes to tell us that he has discovered perpetual motion, or been swallowed by the sea-serpent, there will yet be some point in the story where he will tell us about himself almost all that we require to know." Not only is this true, but the impression of every event or truth, which is all any man can tell, is de- pendent upon the character of the man, and while the monologue seems to reverse the natural method in requiring us to conceive of character and situa- tion before the thought, it thus presents a deeper truth and causes a more adequate impression. Both the person talking and the scene must be apprehended by the imagination; then the mean- ing is no longer abstract; it is presented with the living witnesses. Persons who want only the mean- ing usually ignore all situation or environment. The co-ordination of many elements is the secret of the peculiar power and force of the monologue. Argument 87 The monologue is not unnatural. Life is com- plex, and elements in nature are not found in isola- tion. The colors of nature are always found in combination, and primary colors are rare. Art is composed of a very few elements, but how rarely do we find one of these separated from the others. So an emphatically demonstrated abstract truth is rarely found. Truth gives reality to truth. Thought implies a thinking soul. No thought is completed until expressed ; art is ever necessary to show rela- tions. In every age the parable, or some other indirect method, has been employed for the sim- plest lessons. Words can only hint at truth. An abstraction verges toward an untruth. A mere rule, even an abstract statement of law, is worth little except as obeyed or its working seen among men. Men or women of the finest type rarely discuss their fellow-beings, for the smallest remark quoted from another may produce a false impression. What was the occasion ? What was the spirit with which it was spoken ? What was the smile upon the face ? What was the tenderness in the voice ? The exact words may be quoted, yet without the tone and action these may be falsified. Even facts may convey an utterly false impression. Everything in nature is related. An interpre- tation of truth, accordingly, demands the presenta- tion of right relations. The flower that is cut and placed in a vase has lost the bower of green leaves, the glimmer of the sunlight, the sparkle of the dew, and the blue sky "full of light and deity." In the monologue we must pass from "the letter that killeth" to ^'the spirit that giveth life." The primary meaning hides itself, that we may take 88 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue account of the witnesses first, for in the mouth of "two or three witnesses every word may be es- tabhshed." "The word that he speaks is the man himself." But how rarely do we realize this. It is impossible to do so without a conception of the~voice. ^The smile and the actions of the body^ aifd natural modulations of the voice reveal the fulness of the impression and the life that is merely suggested by a word. The monologue, implying all these, makes men realize a truth more vividly by showing the feeling and attitude toward truth of a living, thinking man. It is not to superficialize the truth that the mono- logue adopts an indirect method. It does not con- cern itself with situations and characters for mere amusement or adornment. It does not introduce scenery to atone for lack of thought, but seeks to awaken the right powers to realize it. A profound theme may be discussed dramatically as well, and at times much better than in an essay or a speech. To receive a right impression from "Abt Vogler," for example, the reader must con- sciously or unconsciously reahze the point of view, and also the philosophic arguments for the highest idealism of the age. We must know the depth of meaning in the hne : "On the earth the broken arcs; in the heaven, a perfect round." We must perceive, too, the philosophy beneath such words as these : "All we have willed or hoped or dreamed of good shall exist," and even the argument that makes " Our failure here but a triumph's evidence." Argument 8g "Sorrow is hard to bear, and doubt is slow to clear,. Each sufferer says his say, his scheme of the weal and woe: But God has a few of us whom he whispers in the ear; The rest may reason and welcome; 't is we musicians know." "Musicians" is used in a suggestive sense to indicate mystics and idealists. The argument of the monologue, accordingly, is found in dramatic sequence of natural thinking. It is not a logical or systematic arrangement of points, but the association of ideas as they spring up in the mind. As has been shown, the start is everything, since it indicates the connection of the speaker with the unwritten situation or preceding thought of his hstener. . The argument then follows naturally. The argument of "A Death in the Desert" is one of the most complex and difficult to follow. Brown- ing opens and closes the poem with a bracketed passage, and inserts one also in another place. These bracketed lines are written or said by another than Pamphylax, the speaker in the main part of the monologue. They refer to the old fragments and parchments with their methods of enumeration by Greek letters. This gives the impression and feehng of the ancient documents and the peculiar difficulties in the criticism of the texts of the New Testament, upon which so much of the evidence of Christianity depends. Pamphylax gives in the monologue an account of the death of John, the beloved disciple, who was supposed to have been the last man who had actually seen the Christ Avith his own eyes. It occurs in the midst of the perse- cution which came about this time. The dying John is in the cave, near Ephesus, with a boy out- side pretending to care for the sheep, but ready to 90 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue give warning of the approach of Roman soldiers. The speaker, who was present, describes all that happened, and repeats the words of the dying apostle. Browning makes John foresee that the evidences of Christianity would no longer depend upon simply "I saw," as there would be no one left when John was dead who could say it. He thus makes him foresee all the critical difficulties of modern times in relation to the evidences of Christianity, and, in the spirit of John's gospel and of the whole philosophy of that time, as well as with a profound understanding of the needs of the nine- teenth century, he makes John unfold a solution of the difficulties. This profoundly significant poem will tax to the very utmost any method of explaining the mono- logue. But Browning anticipates this difficulty in part, and gives the atmosphere of the ancient man- uscripts, introducing to us details about the rolls, the situation, the spectators, and the appearance of John. In fact, a monologue is found within a monologue, the words of John himself constituting the essence or spirit of the passage; and thus Browning is enabled to present the deepest thought through the words of the beloved disciple. The difficulties are thus brought into relation with the philosophy of that age, and at the same time the strongest critical and philosophical thought of the poet's time is expounded. One special difficulty in tracing the argument of a monologue will be found in the suddenlind abrupt transitions. ThesCj however, are perfeciry^tuf^r in fact, they are the peculiar characterjstics of all good monologues, and express the dramatic spirTC Since the monologue is the direct revelation of this Argument gi spirit in human thinking rather than in human acting, which is shown by the play, these sudden changes of mood or feehng are necessary to the monologue as the drama of the thinking mind. The person who reads a monologue aloud will find that its abrupt transitions are a great help, and not a hindrance. When proj)erly emphasized and accentuated by vdice^nd action, they become the cMefTmeansot making the thought luminous and jor^ble. One of the best examples of what we may call the dramatic argument of a monologue is found in Browning's "The Bishop orders his Tomb at Saint Praxed's Church," one of the ablest criti- cisms ever offered upon both the moral and the artistic spirit of the Renaissance. Notice that "Rome, 15 — " is a subtitle. The Bishop begins with the conventional lament, "Taiiity 7 "saith the~ preacher, vanity ! " He is dying, and has called his nephews, — now owned as sons, for he has been unfaithful to his priestly vow of chastity, — about his bed TorTiis farewell instructions. His greatest anxiety is regarding his monument, and as he thinks of this purpose of his life, his whole char- acter reveals itself. We perceive his oldjeaLousy and envy of a former bishop, and the very thought of this predecessor causes sudden transitions and agitations in the dying man's mind. We discover tnat his seeming^love of the beautiful is only a sen- suous admiration~eritifely different from thatjtrue Tove^ of "aft which Browning endeavored to inter- pfeL To his sons he speaks frankly of his sins. His pompous and egotistical liMngs are shown in his caAising^his sons fo'inafcE m and out in a stately CKremonial. This adds color to the poem and helps 92 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue to concentrate attention upon the character of the^ speaker. Ruskin has some important words in his "Mod- ern Painters" upon this poem: "I know no other piece of modern EngUsh, prose or poetry, in which there is so much told as in these lines, of the Re- naissance spirit, — its worldliness, inconsistency, pride, hypocrisy, ignorance of itself, love of art, of luxury, and of good Latin. It is nearly all I said of the central Renaissance in thirty pages in 'The Stones of Venice,' put into as many lines. Brown- ing's being also the antecedent work. The worst of it is that this kind of concentrated writing needs so much solution before the reader can fairly get the good of it, that people's patience fails them, and they give the thing up as insoluble." [ In studying the argument the reader should note the many suHden changes in almost every phrase, ^specially atSfgtr For example^ / "Nephews — sons mine ... ah God, I know not!" And so he continues : " She is dead beside," and "Saint Praxed's ever was the church for peace." Note his break into business : "And so, about this tomb of mine. . . ." This must be given with much saliency in order to show that it is the chief point he has in mind and the purpose of his bringing them together. Most of the other sayings are only dramatic asides, which, however, must be strongly emphasized as indica- tiye of his character. Note the expression of his hate in " Old Gandolf cozened me," though he fought tooth and nail to Argument 93 save his niche. But still, his enemy had secured the south corner : "He graced his carrion with, God curse the same!" \ Yet he accepts the result, and feels that his niche is not so bad : "One sees the pulpit o' the epistle-side." "Onion-stone" and "true peach" are, of course, in direct opposition. Then he tells the great secret of ' his Ufe, how he has hidden a great lump of "... lapis lazuli, Big as a Jew's head cut off at the nape," ! and where it can be found to place between his 1 knees on the monument. And in this he shall have * a great triumph over his enemy — "For Gandolf shall not choose but see and burst!" / After this outbreak of selfishness and envy he re- [ sumes the conventional whine: "Swift as a weaver's shuttle fleet our years." j Suddenly, with a totally different inflection, he re- \ turns to the thought of his tomb : "Did I say basalt for my slab, sons? Black — 'T was ever antique-black I meant !." This is said suddenly, and with the most positive and abrupt inflections . Notice that amid the gloom he will even laugh over the bad Latin of old Gandolf ithe "elucescebat" of his inscription, and abruptly ; demands of his sons that his epitaph be "Choice Latin, picked phrase, TuUy's every word." 94 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Observe his sudden transition from "Nay, boys, ye love me — all of jasper, then ! " to his appeal to their superstition because he has "... Saint Praxed's ear to pray Horses for ye. . . . " and his sudden threat : "Else I give the Pope My villas ! " If we reahze his character, this kind of "con- centrated writing" will not need "so much solu- tion" before the reader can "get the good of it." Certainly people's patience should not fail them, nor should they "give the thing up as insoluble." On the contrary, one who follows the suggestions indicated, understands the natural languages, and "^ has any appreciation of the dramatic spirit, will feel that Browning's form is the best means of giving with a few strokes a thorough understanding of the character of a great movement and era in human history. This is one of Browning's "difficult" poems. Why difficult ? Because most " concentrated " ; be- cause it gives the fundamental spirit of a certain era of the world ; because the poet uses in every case the exact word, however unusual it may be, to express the idea. He should not be blamed if he send the reader to the dictionary to correct his ignorance. Why should not art be as accurate as science? Why should it perpetuate ignorance ? To understand a monologue according to these suggestions the student must first answer such Argument 95 questions as, Who speaks ? What kind of a man says this ? To whom does he speak ? Of whom is he talking? Where is he? At what point in the conversation do we break in upon him in the un- conscious utterance of his hfe and motives ? Then, last of all, — What is the argument ? The general subject and thought will gradually become plain from the first question and the argument may be pretty clear before all the points are presented. When the points are taken up in this order, the meaning of a monologue will unfold as naturally as that of an essay or a simple story, and at the same time afford greater enjoyment and express deeper truth in fewer words. All of these questions are not applicable to every monologue. Sometimes one has greater force than the others. Some monologues are given without any necessity of conceiving a distinct place; some require no definite time in the conversation; in a few the hstener may be almost any one ; but in some monologues every one of these questions will have force. The application of these points, however, is easy, and will be spontaneous to one with dramatic instinct. Only at first do they demand special at- tention and care. The apphcation of all the points suggested or auestions to be answered will be shown best by an lustration, — a short monologue which exempli- fies them all. Let us choose for this purpose Brown- ing's "My L ast Duc hess." The spealcer is the TJuEe, and the meaning of the whole is dependent upon the right conception of his character. He stands before us puffed up with pride, one who chooses "Never to stoop." The person spoken of, the Duchess, and her 96 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue i character form the real theme of the poem, and the I character of the Duke is made to look blacker by contrast. How her youth, beauty, and loveliness shine through his sneers ! " She liked whatever she looked on, and her looks went everywhere," and he was offended that she recognized "anybody's gift" on a plane with his gift of a " nine-hundred-year- old name." This grew, and he "gave commands, then all smiles stopped together." MY LAST DUCHESS FEKEARA That 's my last Duchess painted on the wall, Looking as if she were alive. I call That piece a wonder, now: Fra Pandolf's hands Worked busily a day, and there she stands. Will 't please you sit and look at her ? I said "Fra PandoH " by design, for never read Strangers like you that pictured countenance, * The depth and passion of its earnest glance, But to myself they turned (since none puts by The curtain I have drawn for you, but I) And seemed as they would ask me, if they durst. How such a glance came there; so, not the first Are you to turn and ask thus. Sir, 't was not Her husband's presence only called that spot Of joy into the Duchess' cheek: perhaps Fr4 PandoU chanced to say, "Her mantle laps 1 Over my lady's wrist too much," or, "Paint , Must never hope to reproduce the faint Half-flush that dies along her throat : " such stuff Was courtesy, she thought, and cause enough For calling up that spot of joy. She had A heart — how shall I say ? — too soon made glad, Too easily impressed; she liked whate'er She looked on, and her looks went everywhere. Sir, 't was all one ! My favour at her breast, The dropping of the daylight in the West, The bough of cherries some officious fool Argument 97 Broke in the orchard for her, the white mule She rode with round the terrace, — all and each Would draw from her alike the approving speech, Or blush at least. She thanked men, — good ! but thanked Somehow — I know not how — as if she ranked My gift of a nine-hundred-years-old name With anybody's gift. Who 'd stoop to blame This sort of trifling ? Even had you skill In speech — (which I have not) — to niake your will Quite clear to such an one, and say, "Just this Or that in you disgusts me ; here you miss, Or there exceed the mark " — and if she let Herself be lessoned so, nor plainly set Her wits to yours, forsooth, and made excuse. E'en then would be some stooping; and I choose Never to stoop. Oh sir, she smiled, no doubt, When'er I passed her; but who passed without Much the same smile ? This grew ; I gave commands ; Then all smiles stopped together. There she stands As if alive. WiU 't please you rise ? We '11 meet The company below, then. I repeat. The Count your master's known munificence Is ample warrant that no just pretence Of mine for dowry will be disallowed ; Though his fair daughter's self, as I avowed At starting, is my object. Nay, we'll go Together down, sir. Notice Neptune, though, Taming a sea-horse, thought a rarity, Which Claus of Innsbruck cast in bronze for me ! To whom is the Duke speaking? From the phrase, "The Count your master," and other hints, we infer that the listener is the legal agent of the Count who is father of the next victim, the new Duchess, and that this legal agent has stepped aside to talk with the Duke about the "dowry." The Duke has led the agent upstairs, drawn aside the curtain from the portrait of his last Duchess, and monopolizes the conversation. The situation is marvell0ualy.-suggestive. He 98 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue draws the curtain which "none puts by" but him- self, and assumes an attitude of a connoisseur of art, and calls the portrait "a wonder." Does this admiring of art for art's sake suggest the degen- eracy of his soul? He asks the other to "sit and look at her." The subject in hand is shown by the word "last." How suggestive is the emphasis upon the word, for they have been talking about the new Duchess. In a few lines, as dramatically suggest- ive as any in literature, his character and motives are all revealed, as he intimates to his hearer what is expected from him. Why did he say all this to such a person? To overawe him, to show him what kind of man he had to deal with, and the necessity of accepting the Duke's terms lest " commands " might also be given regarding him, and his "smiles " stop, hke those of the lovely Duchess. It is only an insinuation, but in keeping with the Duke's character. The rising at the end shows that he takes it for granted that everything is settled as he wished it. Notice that the agent falls behind, hke an obedient lackey, but as this would not appear well to the "company below," the Duke says : — "Nay, we'll go Together down." By the time the reader has answered these ques- tions the whole argument becomes luminous. A company has gathered at the Duke's palace to ar- range the final settlement for a marriage between the Duke and the daughter of a count. The Duke and the steward of the Count, or some person act- ing as agent, have stepped aside to consult regard- ing the dowry. The place is chosen by the Duke; Argument 99 in_draw Hig the curtain in front of th e pictureofhis last Duchess, Jie unfolds tus character and alsoT he story, and forcibly portrays the character of insja gl;. yicjun.. CShe was one who loved every body ~and everything in life with true human sympathy. She "thanked" him for every gift, but that was not enough. She smiled at others. She was a flower he had plucked for himself alone, and she must not shbw love or tenderness, or blush at "The bough of cherries some officious fool Broke in the orchard for her, ..." £lt is doubtful whether she died of a broken heart or was deliberately murdered His commands, of course, would not be given to her, but to his lack- eys. Many think she was murdered. Browning leaves it artistically suggestive and uncertain. These questions, of course, will not be answered in any regular order. One point will suggest an- other. The meaning will be partially apparent from the first; but usually the points will be dis- covered in this sequence. When completed, the whole is as simple as a story. The pompous, con - tgrpptnnns air pf thp Pukp, the insinuating way in which he speaks^ the hint afforded by his voice that he will have no trifling, that he had made his de- mands, and that was the end of it; all these details slowly unfold until the whole story, nay, even the deepest motives of his life and character, are clearly perceived. What a wonderful portrayal in fifty -six lines ! Many a long novel does not say so much, nor give such insight into human beings. Many a play does not reveal processes so deep, so profound as this. Browning hints in bis subtitle, "Ferrara," the 100 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue part of the world and the age in which such a piece of villany would have been possible. If the reader will examine some of the most diflfi- cult monologues of Browning, or any of the more popular monologues, by the questions given, he will see at once the peculiar character of the mono- logue as a form of dramatic poetry. Such work must be at first conscious, but when it has been thoroughly done, the rendering or reading of a monologue will be as easy as that of a play. The enjoyment awakened by a good monologue, and the insight it gives into human nature, will well repay the study necessary to realize the artistic peculiari- ties of this form of poetry. VII. THE MONOLOGUE AS A FORM OF LITERATURE The nature of the monologue will be seen more clearly and forcibly if compared with other forms of literature. Forms of literature have not been invented or evolved suddenly. They have been in every case slowly recognized; in fact, one of the last, if not most difficult phases of literary education and cul- ture is the definite conception of the difference between the various forms of poetry. To many persons the word lyric and the word epic are loose terms, the one standing for a short poem and the other for a long one. The real spirit and character of the most elemental forms of poetry are often indefinitely and inadequately realized. If this is true of the oldest and most fundamental forms of poetry, it is still more true of the mono- The Monologue as a Form of Literature loi logue. The word awakens in most minds only the vaguest conceptions. If the monologue be discriminated at all from other forms of Uterature, it is apt to be regarded as an accidental, if not an unnecessary or unnatural, phase of literary creation. Even in books on Browning, nine-tenths of whose work is in this form, the monologue is often spoken of as if it were a speech. It is sometimes treated as if it were simply a long monotonous harangue of some talker like Coleridge, the outflow of whose ideas and words subordinates or puts to silence a whole com- pany. But unless the peculiar nature of the mono- logue is understood, much modern verse will fail to produce an adequate impression. Like the speech, the monologue implies one speaker. But an oration implies an audience, a platform, conscious preparation, and a direct and deliberate purpose. The monologue, on the con- trary, implies merely a conversation on the street, in the shop, or in the home. Usually, only one listener is found, and rarely is there an assembled audience or the formal occasion implied by a speech. The occasion is some natural situation in life capable of causing spontaneous outflow of thought and feeling and an involuntary revelation of motive. The monologue is not a poetic interpretation of an oration, though the latter is frequently found in poetry. Burns 's poem on the speech of Bruce at Bannockburn was called by Carlyle "the finest war-ode in any language," and it is none the less noble because it suggests a speaker. It is a poetic realization of an address to an army. Burns gives the situation and the chief actor speaking as the 102 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue artistic means of awakening a realization of the event. But it is the poetic interpretation of oratory, a lyric, and not a monologue. Dr. Holmes's "Our Boys" is an after dinner speech in metric form, full of good-natured allu- sions to members of the class who were well-known men, but even such a definite situation does not make his work a monologue. ^ "Anything may be poetic by being intensely realized." Poetry may have as its theme any phase of human life or endeavor, and the spirit of oratory has often been interpreted by poetry. Oratory has a direct, conscious purpose. It implies a human being earnestly presenting arguments to move and persuade men to a course of action. The monologue reflects the unconscious and spontaneous effect of one human being upon an- other, but it does not express the poet's own feel- ings, convictions, or motives, except indirectly. We must not take the words of any one of Browning's characters as an echo of the poet's personal con- victions. The monologue expresses the impres- sions which a certain character receives from events or from other people.^ Epic poetry, from its apphcation to an individ- ual case or situation, is made to suggest the ideals, aspirations, or characteristics of the race. The epic makes events or characters more typical or universal, and hence more suggestive and expres- sive. Its personations embody universal ideals. Odysseus is not simply a man, but the representa- tive of every patient, long-suffering Hellenic hero, persevering and enduring trials with fortitude. Achilles is not merely a youth full of anger, but a type of the passionate, liberty-loving and aspiring The Monologue as a Form of Literature 103 Greek. Both Achilles and Odysseus a^'e not so much individual characters as typical Greeks. They express noble emotions breathed into the hearts of mortals by Athena. Odysseus embodies the virtue of temperance and patience symbolized by the cloudless sky, represented by Athena's robe, and of perseverance shown by her unstooping helmet. Achilles with his "destructive wrath,"- embodies the spirit of youth and eager passion cor- responding to the lightning and the storm which are shown by the serpents on Athena's breast. We are apt to regard the epic as simply differing in form from the drama ; the drama being adapted to stage representation, while the epic is not. But there are deeper differences. Though the drama may portray a character as noble as the suffering Prometheus, a representative of the race, or one as low as Nick Bottom; and though the epic may portray by the side of the swift-footed Achilles and the wise Ulysses the physical and rough Ajax, still at the heart of every form of poetry is found a dif- ferent spirit. Even when the same subject is intro- duced, a different aspect will be suggested. Every form of human art expresses something which can be adequately expressed in no other way. Dramatic art is recognized as being complex. From the following definition of the term "dra- matic" by Freytag in his "Technique of the Drama," many points may be inferred regarding its unique character: "The term dramatic is appUcable to two classes of emotions : those which are sufficiently vigorous to crystallize into will and act, and those which are aroused by an act. It accordingly includes the psychical processes which go on within the human 104 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue soul from the initiation of a feeling up to passionate desire and activity, and also the influences exerted upon the soul by the acts of oneself or of others. In other words, it includes the outward movement of the will from the depths of the nature toward the external world, and the inward movement of im- pression from the external world which influence the inner nature: or, in fine, the coming into ex- istence of an act ; and its consequences for the soul. Neither action in itself nor passionate emotion in itself is dramatic. The function of dramatic art is not the representation of passion in itself, but of passion leading to action ; it is not the representa- tion of an event in itself, but of its reflections in the human soul. The representation of passionate emotion in itseh, as such, is the function of the lyric; the depicting of interesting events, as such, is the business of the epic." ^ This explanation of dramatic art at first seems very thorough and complete. It certainly includes more than the play, although worked out with special reference to the play. But any true study of dramatic art must recognize the fact that the play, important as it is, is only one of its aspects. This definition, fine as it is, needs careful con- sideration, and possibly may be found, after all, inadequate. If it refers at all to some of the most important aspects, the reference is vague. Dra- matic art must also include points of view, insight into motives, the nature and necessity of situation, and especially the discovery by one man of an- other's attitude of mind. The definition is notable because it does not * Freytag, Technik des Dramas, chap, i, sec. 2, p. 16 (Leipzig, 1881). Translation by Prof. H. B. Lathrcp. The Monologue as a Form of Literature 105 define dramatic art, as is so apt to be the case, by hmitation. When any form of art is defined by hmitation, the next great artist that arises will break the shackles of such a rule, and show its utter inadequacy. When Sir Joshua Reynolds said blue could not be used as the general color scheme of a picture, Gainsborough responded with the now famous painting, "The Blue Boy." Dramatic art is especially difficult to define be- cause it is the very essence of poetry, and deals with that most difficult of all subjects, the human soul. Accordingly, illustrations of dramatic art are not only safer than definitions, but more sug- gestive of its true nature. Definitions are especially inadequate in our endeavors to perceive the differ- ences between the dramatic elements of a play and those of a monologue. To realize more completely the general nature of dramatic art, let us note how a play differs from a story. A certain noble and his wife slew their king while he was their guest, and usurped the crown. In order to conceal their crime and keep themselves on the throne, the new king slew other persons, and even murdered the wife and children of a noble who had fled to England and espoused the cause of the rightful heir to the throne, the son of the mur- dered king. The usurper was finally overthrown and killed in battle by the knight whose family he had slain. Such are the bare items of the story of " Mac- beth." When these facts were fashioned into a play, the interest was transferred from the events to the characters of the principal individuals con- cerned. Their ambitious motives, their resolu- io6 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue tion or hesitation to perform the murder, and the effects of this crime upon them were not only por- trayed by Shakespeare, but to Lady Macbeth is given a different type of conscience from that of her husband. While at first, or before Macbeth committed his first crime, he hesitated long, his conscience afterward became "seared as with a hot iron." Although he hesitated greatly over the murder of Duncan, he later pursued his purpose without faltering for a moment. The conscience of Lady Macbeth, on the contrary, is awakened by crime. These two types of conscience are often found in life, but have never been so truly repre- sented as in Shakespeare's interpretation of them. Possibly no other art except dramatic art could have portrayed this experience and interpreted such deep differences between human beings. Now note the peculiarities of the monologue. A man must part from a woman he loves. He has been rejected, or for other reasons it is necessary for him to speak the parting word ; they may meet as friends, but never again can they meet as lovers. There are not enough events here to make a story, and the mere statement of them awakens- little in- terest. But Browning writes a monologue upon this slender theme which is so short that it can be printed here entire. THE LOST MISTRESS All 's over, then : does truth sound bitter As one at first believes ? Hark, 't is the sparrows' good-night twitter About your cottage eaves ! And the leaf-buds on the vine are woolly, I noticed that, to-day; One day more bursts them open fuUy: You know the red turns gray. The Monologue as a Form of Literature 107 To-morrow we meet the same then, dearest? May I take your hand in mine ? Mere friends are we, — well, friends the merest Keep much that I resign: For each glance of the eye so bright and black, Tho' I keep with heart's endeavor, — Your voice, when you wish the snowdrops back, Tho' it stay in my soul for ever ! — Yet I will but say what mere friends say. Or only a thought stronger ; I will hold your hand but as long as all may, Or so very little longer ! Here we have as speaker a distinct type of man, and the precise moment is chosen when he is bid- ding good-bye. Attention is focussed upon him for a single moment during a single speech. Ob- serve the naturalness of the reference to insignifi- cant objects in stanzas one and two. In the hour of bitterest experience, every one remembers some leaf or tree or spot of sunshine that seems burnt into the mind forever. Note the speaker's hesita- tion, and how in the struggle for self-control he makes seemingly careless remarks. How true to human nature ! Here we have presented an instant in the Ufe of a soul; a trying moment, when, if ever, weakness will be shown; when refuge is taken in little things to stem the tide of feeling, as the man gives up the supreme hope of his life. This is dramatic, and the disclosure of character is unconscious, spontaneous, involuntary. Again, take as an illustration a longer mono- logue. A certain young duke has been taken away by his mother to foreign parts and there educated, and has come back proud and conventional. He io8 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue must marry ; and a beautiful woman, chosen from a convent, is elevated to his exalted sphere. But, regarded as a mere flower cut from the woods and brought to adorn his room, she is not allowed to exercise any influence over her supposed home. Desiring to revive the medieval customs, the Duke arranges a ceremonious hunt, with costumes of the period, and the Duchess is given the part of presid- ing at the killing of the victim. This part she re- fuses. As the angry Duke rides away to the hunt, he meets an old gypsy, and, to punish the Duchess, instructs this old crone to give his wife a fright, promising her money for the service. When the Duke returns, Duchess and gypsy have fled. This is the story of "The Flight of the Duchess." Browning chooses a family servant who was wit- ness to the whole transaction to tell the story, when long after the event he comes in contact with a friend, a sympathetic foreigner, who will not betray him, and to whom he can safely confide the real facts. The speaker starts out with a sudden reference to his being beckoned by the Duke to lead the gypsy back to his mistress. He describes the place, the character of the Duke, — born on the same day with himself, — "... the pertest little ape That ever aSronted human shape; " his feducation, his return, his marriage with the Duchess, and gives, not a mere story, but his own point of view, his impressions, while the complex effect of the actions and character of the Duke, the Duchess, and the rest upon himself are meanwhile suggested. The Monologue as a Form of Literature 109 Vividly he describes the first entrance of the Duchess into the old castle and her desire to trans- figure it all, as was her right, into the beauty and loveUness of a home; and how she was shut up, entirely idle. As a participant in the hunting scene, he de- scribes the bringing out of ancestral articles of clothing, the tugging on of old jack-boots, and the putting on of discarded articles of medieval dress. What a touch regarding the experiences of the Duke's tailor ! Then follows the long study as to the role the Duchess should play, — she, of course, being supposed to sit idly awaiting it, whatever it might be. When, to the a^stonishment of the Duke, she refuses the part, his cruelty and that of his mother is shown in the fearful description of the latter's tongue. At last they leave the Duchess alone to become aware of her sins. What pictures does the servant paint ! The old gypsy crone sidles up to the Duke as he is riding off to the hunt. He gives no response until she says she has come to pay her respects to the new Duchess. Then his face lights up, and he whispers in her ear and tells her of the fright she is to give the Duchess ; and beckoning a servant, — the speaker in the monologue, sends him as her guide. This man, as he guides the old woman toward the castle, sees her become transfigured before him. Later he, with Jacinth, his sweetheart, waits out- side on the balcony until, awakened by her croon- ing song, he becomes aware that the gypsy is bewitching the Duchess. Yet, when his mistress issues forth, a changed woman, with transfigured face and a look of determination, he obeys her least motion, brings her palfrey, and thus aids in no Browning and the Dramatic Monologue her escape. Browning gives a characteristic final touch, and we see this man gazing into the distance and expressing his determination soon to leave aU and go forth into the wide world to find the lost Duchess. The theme of all art is to interpret impressions or to produce upon the human heart an adequate impression of events and of truth. Dramatic art has always led the other arts in its power to present the motives of different characters, show the vari- ous processes of passion passing into action, the consequences of action, or the working of the com- plex elements of a human character. Professor Dowden in his recent life of Browning, in endeavoring to explain the peculiarities of Brown- ing's plays, makes an important point, which is still more apphcable to the dramatic form which he calls "the short monodrama," but which I call the monologue. "Dramatic, in the sense that he (Browning) created and studied minds and hearts other than his own, he pre-eminently was ; if he desired to set forth or to vindicate his most intimate ideas or impulses, he effected this indirectly, by detaching them from his own personahly and giving them a brain and a heart other than his own in which to live and move and have their being. There is a kind of dramatic art which we may term static, and another kind which we may term dynamic. The former deals especially with characters in posi- tion, the latter with characters in movement. Pas- sion and thought may be exhibited and interpreted by dramatic genius of either type; to represent passion and , thought and action — action incar- nating and developing thought and passion — the dynamic power is required. And by action we are The Monologue as a Form of Literature 1 1 1 to understand not merely a visible deed, but also a word, a feeling, an idea, which has in it a direct operative 'force. The dramatic genius of Brown- ing was in the main of the static kind ; it studies with extraordinary skill and subtlety character in position; it attains only an imperfect or labored success with character in movement" ("Brown- ing," by Edward Dowden, p. 53). The expression "static dramatic" is more appli- cable to Browning's plays, paradoxical as it may seem, than to his monologues. The monologues are full of dynamic force. Even Dowden himself speaks in another place of "Muleykeh," and calls it "one of the most delightful of Browning's later poems, uniting as it does the poetry of swift motion with the poetry of high-hearted passion." Brown- ing certainly does in many of his monologues sug- gest most decided action. The expression "static" must be understood as referring to the dramatic elements or manifestations of character, which result from situation and thinking rather than through action and plot. If the scope of dramatic art be confined to a formal play with its unity of action among many characters, with its introduction, slow develop- ment, explosion, and catastrophe, then the mono- logue must have a very subordinate place. The dramatic element, however, is in reality much broader than this. It is not a mere invention of a poet, but the expression of a phase of life. This may be open, the result of a conflict on the street, or concealed, the result of deep emotions and mo- tives. It may be the outward and direct effect of one human being upon another, or the result of unconscious influence. 112 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Nor is it mere external action, mere conflicts of men in opposition to each other that reveal char- acter. Its fundamental revelations are found in thinking and feeling. Whatever method or literary form can reveal or interpret the thought, emotion, motive, or bearing of a soul in a specific situation, is dramatic. The essence of the dramatic spirit is seen when Shakespeare presents Macbeth think- ing alone, after speaking to a servant : — "Go, bid thy mistress, when my drink is ready. She strike upon the bell. Get thee to bed." While waiting for this signal that all is ready, Shakespeare uncovers the conflicts of a soul about to commit a crime. The inner excitement, the roused imagination and feeling, the chaotic whirl of thoughts and passions reveal the nature of the human conscience. What would Macbeth be to us without the soliloquies ? What would the play of "Hamlet" be without the uncoverings of Ham- let's inmost thought when alone ? Nay, what is the essence of the spirit of Shakespeare, the most dra- matic of all poets ? Not the plots, frequently bor- rowed and always very simple, but the uncovering of souls. He makes men think and feel before us. The unities of time, place, and action are all tran- scended by a higher unity of character. It is because Shakespeare reveals the thinking and feeling heart that he is the supreme dramatic poet. No spectacular show, no mere plot, however involved, no mere record of events, however thrill- ing, interprets human character. Nor does dra- matic art centre in any stage or formal play, nor is the play dramatic unless it centres in thinking and reveals the attitude of the mind. TRe dra- History of the Monologue 113 matic element in art shows the result of soul in conflict with soul; and more than this, it implies the revelation of a soul only half conscious of its motives and the meaning of life, reveahng indirectly its fiercest battles, its truest nature. Vm. HISTORY OF THE MONOLOGUE A GLANCE over Enghsh literature shows us the fact that the monologue was no sudden invention of Browning's, but that it has been gradually devel- oped, and is a natural form, as natural as the play. A genuine form of poetry is never invented. It is a mode of expressing the fundamental life of man, and while authors may develop it, bring it to per- fection, and make it a means for their " criticism of life," we can always find hints of the same form in the works of other authors, nations, and ages. If we examine the monologue carefully, compar- ing it with various poems, ancient and modern, we shall find that the form has been long since antici- pated, and was simply carried to perfection by Browning. It is not artificial nor mechanical, but natural and necessary for the presentation of certain phases of experience. The monologue, as has already been shown, is closely akin to the lyric ; hence, among lyric poems we find in all ages some which are monologues in spirit. If criticism is to appreciate this form and its function in literary expression, and show that it is the outcome of advancement in culture and of the necessity for a broader realization of human nature, some attention should be given to its early examples. 114 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue If we go no farther back than EngUsh poetry, and in this only to Sir Thomas Wyatt (b. 1503) we find that "The Lover's Appeal" has some of the char- acteristics of a monologue. The words are spoken by. a distinct character directly to a specific hearer. "And wilt thou leave me thus ? Say nay ! say nay ! for shame, To save thee from the blame Of all my grief and shame. And wilt thou leave me thus ? Say nay! say nay!" Marlowe's "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love," beginning — "Come live with me and be my love," also represents a lover talking to his beloved. In reading it we should picture their relations to each other. The poem may be spoilt by introducing a transcendence of the dramatic element. It is a simple lyric. The shepherd is idealized, and ex- presses the universal love of the human heart. Still it is not the kind of love that one would directly express to an audience. The reader will instinc- tively imagine his character and his hearer, and, if reading to ;6thers, will unconsciously place her a little to the side. This objective element aids lyric expression. To address it to an audience, as some public readers do, implies that the loving youth is a Mormon. Both these poems imply two characters, one speaking, one hstening, and an adequate interpre- tation of each poem must suggest a feeUng be- tween two human beings. In Sir Walter Raleigh's "Reply to Marlowe's Shepherd," the positions of the listener and the speaker are simply reversed. History of the Monologue 115 These poems are, of course, lyrics. They may be said by any lover. The emotion is everything. The situation or idea is simple. The expression of intense personal feeling predominates, and the im- petuous, spontaneous movement of passion subor- dinates or eliminates all conception of character. Still, though primarily lyrics, in form these poems are monologues. In each there is one person directly addressing another. In the expression of these lyrics, we find the naturalness of the situation represented by a monologue. While "The Passionate Shepherd to his Love" is one of the distinctive lyrics in the language, yet the intense realization of the object loved will cause the sympathetic interpreter to turn a little away from the audience. The subjective and per- sonal elements in the poem awaken emotion so exalted in its nature that the speaker is uncon- scious of all except his beloved. Still there is a slight objective element. The words are spoken by a shepherd in love and are addressed directly, at least in imagination, to his laeloved. But when not carried too far or made dramatic and other than lyric, this monologue ele- ment may be an aid, not a hindrance ; it may in- tensify the expression of the lyric feehng. Such poems, which are very common, may be called monologue lyrics or lyrical monologues. They show the naturalness of the form of the mon- ologue, its unconscious use, its gradual recognition, and completion. Forms of poetry are complemental to each other, and one who tries to be merely dramatic without appreciating the lyric spijkbecomes theatric. In rendering sut^lTlyriS, the turning aside de- ii6 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue mands greater intensity of lyric feeling, otherwise it is better that they be given with simple directness to the audience. "Why so pale and wan, fond lover? Prythee, why so pale ? Will, if looking well can't move her. Looking Ul prevail ? Prythee, why so pale ? "Why so dull and mute, young sinner? Prythee, why so mute ? Will, when speaking well can't win her. Saying nothing do't ? Prythee, why so mute ? "Quit, quit, for shame ! this will not move, This cannot take her; If of herself she will not love, Nothing can make her: The D— 1 take her ! " This poem implies a speaker who is laughing at a lover, and both speaker and hstener remain dis- tinct. Its rendering seems dramatic. Its jolhty and good nature must be strongly emphasized and it must be directly addressed to the lover. It is still lyric, however, because the ideas and feehngs are more pronounced than any distinct type of character, in either the speaker or the listener. The same is true of Michael Drayton's "Come, let us kiss and part." This implies a situation still more dramatic. The characters of the speaker and the listener seem to be brought in immediate con- tact, revealing not only intense feeling, but some- thing of their peculiarities. "Since there's no help, come, let us kiss and part; Nay, I have done, yo^^et no more of me; And I am glad, yea, g^Hp^ith all my heart That thus so cleanly Tmyself can free ; History of the Monologue 117 Shake hands for ever, cancel all our vows; And when we meet at any time again, Be it not seen in either of our brows That we one jot of former love retain. — Now at the last gasp of Love's latest breath. When his pulse failing, passion speechless lies. When Faith is kneeling by his bed of death. And Innocence is closing up his eyes. Now, if thou wouldst, when all have given him over, From death to life thou might'st him yet recover." Burns 's "John Anderson, my Jo" has possibly more of the elements of a monologue. We must conceive the character of an old Scottish wife, enter into sympathy with her love for her " Jo," and fully express this to him. Her love is the theme. Yet it is not the feeling of any lover, but instead, that of an aged wife, a noble, a faithful and loving character of a specific type. Still, though the poem can be rendered dramati- cally, in dialect, and with the conception of a specific type of woman, the poet realized the emotion as universal, and the specific picture is furnished only as a kind of objective means of showing the noble- ness of love. Some persons, in rendering it, make it so subjective that they represent the woman as talking to a mental picture of her husband, rather than to his actual presence. But it would seem that some dramatic interpretation is necessary. We do not identify ourselves completely with the thought and feeling, but rather with her situation or point of view as the source of the feehng, and certainly it may be rendered with the interest centred in her character. Many other poems of Burns 's have a dramatic element. The failure ^ recognize some of his poems as monologues has possibly been the cause Ii8 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue of some of the adverse criticism upon him. He was not insincere in "Afton Water." It is not a personal love poem. In fact, it expresses admira- tion for nature more than any other emotion. The Mary in this poem is an imaginary being. Dr. Currie was no doubt correct when he said the poem was written in honor of Mrs. Stewart of Stair. It may also be in honor of Highland Mary, as the poet's brother, Gilbert, thought. The two views will not seem inconsistent to one who knows Burns 's custom in writing his poems. Burns frequently used this indirect or dramatic method. In situations calling only for the expres- sion of simple friendship, he adopted the manner of a lover pouring out his feelings to his beloved, and many poems which are nothing more than celebrations of friendly and kindly relations are yet conceived as uttered by a lover. ' One of his last poems, written, in fact, when he was on his death-bed, was addressed to Jessie Lewars, the sister of a brother exciseman, a young girl who took care of the poet and of his sick wife and family during his last illness, and without whose kindness the dying poet would have lacked many comforts. In writing this poem, however, his man- ner still clung to him, and he expresses his gratitude in the tone of a lover. 'Oh, wert thou in the cauld blast On yonder lea, on yonder lea, My plaidie to the angry airt, I 'd shelter thee, I 'd shelter thee : Or did misfortune's bitter storms Around thee blaw, around thee blaw, Thy bield shoul^ be my bosom, To share it a', to share it a'. History of the Monologue 119 "Or were I in the wildest waste, Of earth and air, of earth and air. The desert were a paradise If thou wert there, if thou wert there. Or were I monarch o' the globe, Wi' thee to reign, wi' thee to reign, The brightest jewel in my crown Wad be my queen, wad be my queen." Of course, this is lyric. Though not the lover of Jessie, in imagination he became such^ and hence the lover's feeUng, though the result of an im- aginary situation, completely predominates. The point, however, here is that it has a monologue form, and that we make a mistake in conceiving that every poem which Burns wrote is purely personal. The monologue situation was so intensely real- ized by his imagination that his poetry, while lyric in form, cannot be adequately understood unless we perceive the species of dramatic element which a true understanding of the monologue should enable us to realize. Burns 's poems often contain dramatic elements peculiar to the monologue and must be rendered with an imaginary speaker and an imaginary hstener. Little conception of character is given, and, of course, the lyric element greatly predomi- nates over all else. Those poems in which he speaks directly out of his own heart in a purely lyric spirit, such as "Highland Mary," are more highly prized. But if we did not constantly overlook the peculiar dramatic element in some of his other poems we should doubtless appreciate them more highly- Even "To a Mountain Daisy" and "To a Field Mouse" are monologues in form. Coming to the consideration of more recent lit- 120 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue erature, we find in lyric poems an increasing preva- lence of the objective or dramatic element. Whit- man's "Oh, Captain, my Captain," seems to be the direct unburdening of the writer's overweighted heart. He does not materially differ in his feehng for Lincoln from his fellow-citizens, and every one, in reading the poem aloud, adopts the emotion as his own. There is certainly no dramatic emotion in the heart of the speaker in the poem. But there is a definite figurative situation and representation of the Ship of State, coming in from its long voyage, — that is, the Civil War, — and a picture of Lincoln, the captain, lying upon the deck. This objective element enables us to grasp the situation and more delicately suggests Lincoln, whose name does not occur in the poem. It is almost impossible to separate the different forms of poetry. We can discern differences, but they are not "separable entities." The monologue is possibly as much the outgrowth of the lyric as of the dramatic spirit. It is, in fact, a union of the two. Notice the title of some of Browning's books : "Dramatic Idyls," "Dramatic Lyrics," "Dra- matic Romances." Mr. Palgrave calls "Sally in our Alley," by Carey, " a little masterpiece in a very difficult style ; Catullus himseh could hardly have bettered it. In grace, tenderness, simplicity, and humor it is worthy of the ancients, and even more so from the unity and completeness of the picture presented." He neglects, however, to add that its "unity and com- pleteness" are due to the fact that it is inform a monologue. The person addressed is indefinitely conceived, but we can hardly imagine the poem to be a speech to a company. It must therefore be History of the Monologue 121 imagined as spoken to some sympathetic friend. The necessity of a right conception of the person addressed was not definitely included in the mono- logue until Browning wrote. The character of the speaker in this poem, however, is most definitely drawn, and is the centre of interest. We must ade- quately conceive this before understanding the spirit of the poem. Then we shall be able to agree with what Mr. Palgrave says, not only regarding the pic- ture presented, but the direct relationship of every figure, wbrd, and turn of phrase as consistent with the character. SALLY IN OUR ALLEY Of all the girls that are so smart There 's none like pretty Sally ; She is the darling of my heart, And she lives in our alley. There is no lady in the land Is half so sweet as Sally; She is the darling of my heart, And she lives in our alley. Her father he makes cabbage-nets And through the streets does cry 'em; Her mother she sells laces long To such as please to buy 'em: But sure such folks could ne'er beget So sweet a girl as Sally ! She is the darling of my heart, And she lives in our alley. When she is by, I leave my work, I love her so sincerely; My master comes like any Turk, And bangs me most severely — But let him bang his bellyful, I'llbear it all for Sally; She is the darling of my heart, And she lives in our alley. 122 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Of all the days that 's in the week I dearly love but one day — And that 's the day that comes betwixt A Saturday and Monday; For then I 'm drest all in my best To walk abroad with Sally; She is the darling of my heart, And she lives in our alley. My master carries me to church, And often am I blamed Because I leave him in the lurch As soon as text is named; I leave the church in sermon-time And slink away to Sally; She is the darling of my heart. And she lives in our alley. When Christmas comes about again then I shall have money; I '11 hoard it up, and box it all, 1 '11 give it to my honey : I would it were ten thousand pound, I 'd give it all to Sally ; She is the darling of my heart. And she lives in our alley. My master and the neighbors all Make game of me and Sally, And, but for her, I 'd better be A slave and row a galley; But when my seven long years are out O then I '11 marry Sally, — O then we 'U wed, and then we 'U bed. But not in our alley ! All these poems show the necessity for classifica- tion as lyric monologues ; that is, poems lyric in every sense of the word, which yet have a certain dramatic or objective form peculiar to the mono- logue to give definiteness and point. The reader, however, must be very careful not to turn lyrics into monologues. The pure lyric History of the Monologue 123 should be rendered subjectively, neither as dra- matic, on the one hand, nor as oratoric on the other. To render a lyric as a dramatic monologue is as bad as to give it as a speech. The discussion of the peculiar differences between the lyric and the monologue, and the discrimination of lyric mono- logues as a special class, should suggest the great variety of lyrics and monologues, how nearly they approach and how widely they differ from each other. Whether a poem is a lyric or a monologue must be decided without regard to types or classi- fications, except in so far as comparison may throw light upon the general nature and spirit of the poetry. Different forms are often used to interpret each other, and the spirit of nearly all may be com- bined in one poem. A peculiar type of the monologue, found occa- sionally in recent literature, may be called the epic monologue. Tennyson's "Ulysses" seems at first, in form at least, a monologue. Ulysses speaks throughout in character, and addresses his com- panions. But we presently find that Ulysses stands for the spirit of the race. He is not an individual, but a type, as he was in Homer, though he is a dif- ferent type in Tennyson ; and the poem typifies the human spirit advancing from its achievements in the art and philosophy of Greece into a newer world. Western civilization is prefigured in this poem, and Ulysses meeting again the great Achilles symbohzes the spirit of mankind once more entering upon new endeavors, these being represented by Achilles. " Ulysses " is thus allegoric or epic. The monologue elements are but a part of the objective form that gives it unity and character. The same is true of "Sir Galahad," While Sir 124 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Galahad is the speaker, and the poem is in form a monologue, yet to regard him as a mere literal char- acter would make him appear egotistic and boast- ful, and this would totally pervert the poem. The knight stands for an ideal human soul. Every person identifies himself with Sir Galahad, but not in the dramatic sense. While in the form of a mono- logue, it is, nevertheless, allegoric or epic, and the search for the Holy Grail is given in its most sug- gestive and spiritual significance. If the monologue is a true literary form, it has not been invented. If it is only a mechanism, such as the rondeau, it is unworthy of prolonged discus- sion ; but that it is a true literary form is proven by the fact that it necessarily co-ordinates with the lyric, epic, and dramatic forms of literature. These show that it is not mechanical or isolated, but as natural as any poetic or literary form. That the monologue is fundamental, no one can doubt who has listened to a little child talking to an imaginary listener, or telephoning in imagination to Santa Claus. That the monologue can reveal profound depths of human nature, no one familiar with Browning can deny. That the form and the spirit of the monologue are almost universal, no one who has looked into Enghsh literature can fail to see. This power of the monologue to unite and enrich other phases or forms of Uterature proves that it is an essential dramatic form, and that its use by recent authors cannot be regarded as a mere desire to be odd. The fact that a story is told by a «ifigle speaker does not necessarily make _a poem a monologue. Longfellow^s "Paul-RevSe's J&ide" is told by the old innkeeper, but the only indication of this History of the Monologue 125 is in the opening clause, "Listen, my children." There is hardly another word in the story that takes color from his individual character. The poem is simply a narrative, and the same is true of all "The Tales of a Wayside Inn." Mr. Chesterton calls "Muleykeh" and "Clive," by Browning, "possibly the two best stories in poetry told in the best manner of story-telUng." Now, are these poems stories or monologues ? They are b oth of them m onologues. The chief iSterestris'not in the eyenH7^bnt4n-the^;^haxa^ pertrayedrr' Every event, every word, and every phrase" has the coloring of human motives and experience. The events of "Muleykeh" from the narrative point of view are few. Muleykeh, or Pearl, is the name of a beautiful horse belonging to Hoseyn, a poor Arab. The rich Duhl offers the price of a thousand camels for Muleykeh, but his offer is re- jected. He steals Pearl by night. Hoseyn is awak- ened and pursues on another horse. He sees that " dog, Duhl," does not know how to ride Muleykeh, and shouts to the fellow what to do to get better speed. The thief takes the hint, and touching the "right ear" and pressing with the foot Pearl's "left flank," escapes. His neighbors "jeered him" for not holding his tongue, when he might easily have had her. "'And beaten in speed!' wept Hdseyn: 'You never have loved my Pearl.' " This poem is in the form of a story, but it is colored not only by the character of the Arab and his well-known love of a horse, but by a narrator who can reveal the character and the pecuhar love of the weeping Hoseyn. 126 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Any one reading the poem aloud must feel that though Browning may have intended it as a story, he was so affected by the dramatic point of view, that it is in spirit, though not in form, essentially a monologue. If there is any doubt about "Mul6ykeh," there can be none that "Clive" is a monologue. " Clive " may seem to some to be involved. Why did not Browning make his hero tell his own story ? Because it was better to take another person, one not so strong, and thus to reveal the impressions which Clive's deed makes upon the average man. Such a man's quotation of Clive's words can be made more exciting and dramatic in its expression. It is difficul t at' time s t o decide wheth er a story is a mcmologue or a _mere narrative. But, in gen- eral, when a story receiyes^a. distinct coloring from a peculiar type^of character, even though in the form of a "narrative, it mayi_be_g.LYfin. with advan- tage as a monologue. Ite general spirit is best in- terpreted by this conception. "Herve Riel," for example, seems at first a mere story, but it has a certain spirited and dramatic movement, and though there is no hint of who the speaker is, it yet possesses the unity of conversa- tion and of the utterance of some specific admirer of "Herve Riel." This may be Browning himself. He wrote the poem and gave it to a magazine, — a rare thing with Browning, — and sent the proceeds to the sufferers in the French Commune ; hence, its French subject and its French spirit. The narrator appears to be a Frenchman; at least he is per- meated with admiration for the noble qualities in the French character at a time when part of the world was criticizing France, if not sneering at it on History of the Monologue 127 account of the victory of the Germans and the chaos of the Commune. One who compares its rendition as an impersonal story with a rendering when conceived by a definite character, by one who realizes the greatness of the forgotten hero of France, will perceive at once the spirit and importance of the monologue. One must look below mere phrases or verbal forms to understand the nature or spirit of the monologue. The monologue is primarily dramatic, and the word "dramatic ' need hardly be added to it any more than to a play, because the idea is implied. Whatever may be said regarding the monologue, certainly the number has constantly increased of those who appreciate the importance of this form in art, which, if Browning did not discover, he ex- tended and elevated. We can hardly open a book of modern poetry which is not full of monologues. Kipling's "Bar- rack-Room Ballads" are all monologues. There is a rollicking, grotesque humor in " Fuzzy- Wuzzy " that makes it at first resemble a ballad, as it is called by the author, but it interests because of its truthful portrayal of the character of a generous soldier. Kipling is dramatic in every fibre. He even portrays the characters of animals, and cer- tain of his animal stories are practically monologues. What a conception of the camel is awakened by "Oonts!" " Rikki-tikki-tavi " awakens a feeling of sympathy for the little mongoose. In his por- trayal of animals, Kipling even reproduces the rhythm of their movements. The very words they are supposed to utter are given in the character of the army mule, the army bullock, and the elephants. 128 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue All Kipling's sketches and so-called ditties, or " Barrack- Room Ballads," are practically dramatic monologues. To render vocally or even to under- stand Kipling requires some appreciation of the peculiarities of the monologue. The Duke of Con- naught asked Kipling what he would like to do. The author replied, ' I should like to live with the army on the frontier and write up Tommy Atkins." Monologue after monologue has appeared with Tommy Atkins as a character type. The mono- logue was almost the only form of art possible for "ballads" or "ditties" or studies of unique types of character in such situations. All poetry, according to Aristotle, expresses the universal element in human nature. Lyric, epic, and dramatic writing alike must become poetic by such an intense realization of an idea, situation, or character that the soul is Ufted into a reahzation of the emotions of the race. Some forget this in studying the differences between lyric and dra- matic poetry. It is not the lyric alone that ideaHzes human experience and umversahzes emotion. The study of Kipling's "Mandalay" especially illustrates the diflEerences between the lyric and the dramatic spirit, and their necessary union in the portrayal of human experience. This is both a lyric and a monologue. It has a dramatic char- acter. A British soldier in a specific place, Lon- don, is talking to some one who can appreciate his feehng, and every word is true to the character speaking and to the situation. But this dramatic element does not interfere with, but on the con- trary aids, the realization and expression of a profoundly lyric feeling and spirit. The soldier re- veals his love, — love deeper than racial prejudices. History of the Monologue 129 — and though "there aren't no Ten Command- ments " in the land of his beloved, he feels the uni- versal emotion in the human heart, a profound love that is superior to any national bound or racial limit. In the poem this love dominates every- thing, — the rhythm, the color of the voice. He even turns from his hearer, and sees far away the vision of the old Moulmein Pagoda, and the sud- denness of the dawn, coming up "... like thunder outer China 'crost the Bay ! " The fact that poetry expresses the "universal element in human nature " is true not only of lyric poetry, but also of dramatic poetry; and in the noblest exaltation of emotion, lyric, dramatic, and epic elements coalesce. It is the aflSnity of the monologue with lyric and epic poetry that proves its own specific character. The fact that there can be a lyric, epic, and narra- tive monologue, proves its naturalness. Many of America's most popular writers have adopted the monologue as their chief mode of ex- pression. James Whitcomb Riley's sketches in the Hoosier dialect present the Hoosier point of view with a homely and sympathetic character as speaker. Even his dialect is but an aspect of the types of character conceived.- The centre of in- terest is not always in the emotion or the ideas, but in the type of person that is the subject of a monologue. The same is true of the poems by the late Dr. Drummond of Montreal. The peculiar French- Canadian dialect was never so well portrayed ; but this is only accidental. The chief interest lies in his creation or reahzation of ijo Browning and the Dramatic Monologue types of character. The artistic form is the mono- logue, however conscious or unconscious may have been the author's adoption of the form. A recent popular book, "The Second Mrs. Jim," uses a series of monologues as the means of inter- preting a new kind of heroine, the mother-in-law. The centre of interest being in this character, the author adopted a series of eight monologues with the same hstener, a friend to whom Mrs. Jim un- folds her inmost heart. With this person she can "come and talk without its bein' spread all over the township." She remarks once that she took something she wanted to be told to a neighbor who was a "good spreader, just as you're the other All the conditions of the monologue are com- plied with ; the situation changes, sometimes being in Mrs. Jim's house, but four or five times in that of her friend. Speaker and listener are always the same. The author wishes to centre attention upon the character of the speaker, her common-sense, her insight into human nature, her skill in manag- ing Jim, and especially the boys ; hence a listener is chosen who will be discreet and say but little, and who is in full sympathy with the speaker. There is little if any plot; but while Mrs. Jim narrates what has happened in the meantime, it is her character, her insight, her humor, her point of view and mode of expression, in which the chief interest centres. This book might be called a narrative monologue, but the narrative is of sec- ondary importance; the centre of interest lies in the portrayal of a character. The use of the monologue as a literary form has grown every year, and no reason can be seen why History of the Monologue 131 its adoption or application may not go on increas- ing until it becomes as truly a recognized literary form as the play. The varieties that can be found from the epic monologue " Ulysses " of Tennyson to such a popular poem as "Griggsby's Station" by James Whitcomb Riley, indicate the uses to which the monologue can be turned and its im- portance as a form of poetry. The fact that we meet a number of monologues before Browning's time shows the naturalness and the necessity of this dramatic form ; yet it is only in Browning that the monologue becomes pro- foundly significant. Browning remains the su- preme master of the monologue. Here we find the deepest interpretation of the problems of existence, and the expression of the depths of human character. So strongly did this form fit his great personality and conception of art that his plays cannot com- pare with his monologues. It was by means of the monologue that he made his deepest revelations. It is safe to say that, without his adoption of the monologue, the best of his poetry would never have been written; and where else in literature can we find such interpretation of hypocrisy .? Where else can we find a more adequate suggestion of the true nature of human love, especially the interpretation of the love of a true man, except in Browning .'* \¥ho can thoroughly comprehend the spirit of the middle part of the nineteenth century, and get a key to the later spiritual unfolding, without study- ing this great poet's interpretation of the burden of his time? Who can contemplate, even for a few moments, some good example of this dramatic form, espe- cially one of Browning's great monologues, and 132 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue not feel that this overlooked form is capable of revealing and interpreting phases of character which cannot be interpreted even by the play or the novel? One form of art should never be compared with another. No form of art can ever be substituted for the play in revealing human action and motive, or even for the novel, with its deep and suggestive interpretation of human life. While the mono- logue will never displace any other form of art, the fact that it can interpret phases of human life and character which no other mode of art can express, proves it to be a distinct form and worthy of critical investigation. Its recognition constitutes one of the phases of the development of art in the nine- teenth century, and it is safe to say that it will re- main and occupy a permanent place as a literary form. We must not, however, exaggerate its im- portance on the one hand, nor on the other too readily pronounce it to be a mere incident and passing oddity. Its instinctive employment by leading authors, those with a message and philos- ophy of life, proves that its true nature and possi- bilities deserve study. PART II DRAMATIC RENDERING OF THE MONOLOGUE IX. NECESSITY OF ORAL RENDITION The monologue, in common with all forms of literature, but especially with the drama, implies something more than words, — only its verbal shell can be printed. As the expression of a living character, it necessarily requires the natural signs of feeling, the modulations of the voice, and the actions of the body. After all questions regarding speaker, hearer, person spoken of, place, connection, subject, and meaning have been settled, the real problem of interpretation begins. The result of the reader's study of these questions must be revealed in the first word or phrase he utters as speaker. Since the poem may be unknown to his auditors, each point must be made clear to them, each question answered, by the suggestive modulations of his voice and the expressive action of his body. This is the real problem of the dramatic artist, and without its solution he can give no interpreta- tion. The long meditation over a monologue, the serious questionings and comparisons, are not enough. He must have a complete comprehension of all the points enumerated, — but this is only the beginning. He must next discover the bearings of the supposed speaker, the attitude of his mind, his feelings and motives. 134 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue To do this, the reader must carefully study those things which the writer could only suggest or imply in words. The poem must be re- created in his imagination. His feeling must be more awake, if possible, than that of the author. In one sense, the terms "vocal expression" and "vocal interpretation of literature," are a misuse of words. The histrionic presentation of a play is not, strictly speaking, a vocal interpretation, nor an interpretation by action. Vocal modulations, mo- tions, and attitudes, the movements of living men and women, are all implied in the very conception of a drama. The voice and action are only the completion of the play. The same is true of the monologue. The ren- dering of it is not an adjunctive performance, not a mere extraneous decoration. It is more than a personal comment; to render a monologue is to make it complete. "Words," said Emerson, "are fossilized poetry." If a monologue is fossilized poetry, its true rendering should restore the original being to life. The written or printed monologue is like an empty garment, to be understood only as it is worn. A living man inside the garment will show the adaptation of all its parts at once. The presentation of a play or of a monologue is its fulfilment, its completion, expressing more fully the conceptions which were in the mind of the writer himself, though with the individuality and the true personal realization of another artist. No two Hamlets have ever been alike, nor ever can be alike, unless one of the two is an imitation of the other. Dramatic art implies two artists, — the writer, who gives broad outlines and suggestions; and the living, sympathetic dramatic interpreter. Necessity of Oral Rendition 135 who realizes and completes the creation. The author creates a poem and puts it into words, and the vocal interpreter then gives it life. A true vocal interpretation of the monologue, as of the play, does not require the changing of one word or syllable used by the author. It is the supplying of the hving languages. Words and actions are complemental languages. Verbal expression is more or less intellectual. It can be recorded. It names ideas and pictures. It is composed of conventional symbols, and only when the words are understood by another mind can it suggest a true sequence of ideas and events. Vocal expression, however, shows the attitude of the mind of the man towards these ideas. Words are objective symbols of ideas. The modulations of the voice reveal the process of thinking and feehng. The word, then, in all cases, implies the living voice. It is but an external form ; the voice reveals the life. Action shows, possibly, even more than tones do, the character of the man, his rela- tions, his "bearings," his impressions or points of view. These three languages are, accordingly, living witnesses. One of them is not complete, strictly speaking, without the others, and the artistic ren- dering of a monologue is simply taking the ob- jective third which the author gives, and which can be printed, and supplying the subjective two-thirds which the imagination of the reader must create and reaUze from the author's suggestion. All printed language is but a part of one of these three languages, which belong together in an or- ganic unity. In the very nature of the case, the better the writing, the greater the suggestion of 136 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue the modulations of voice and body. The highest literature is that which suggests life itseK, and a living man has a beaming eye, a smiling face, a moving body, and a voice that modulates with every change in idea and feeUng. No process has ever been able to record the complexity of these natural languages. Their co-ordination depends upon dramatic instinct. As the play always implies dramatic action, as the mind must picture a real scene and the charac- ters must move and speak as animated beings be- fore there can be the least appreciation of its nature as a play, so the monologue also implies and sug- gests a real scene or moment of human life. The monologue is an artistic whole, and must be understood as a whole. Each part must be felt to be like the hmb of a tree, a part of an organism. As each leaf on the tree quivers with the life hidden in trunk and root, so each word of the monologue must vibrate with the thought and feeling of the whole. Hence, the interpreter of the monologue must command all the natural, expressive modulations of voice and body. He must have imagination and insight into human motives, and his voice and body must respond to this insight and understanding. He must know the language of pause, of touch, of change of pitch, of inflection, of the modulation of resonance, of changes in movement. He must reaUze, consciously or subconsciously, the impor- tance of a look, of a turn of the head, of a smile, of a transition of the body, of a motion of the hand; in brief, throughout all the complex parts consti- tuting the bodily organism he should be master of natural action, which appeals directly to the eye and precedes all speech. Necessity of Oral Rendition 137 Every inflection must be natural; every varia- tion of pitch must be spontaneous ; every emotion must modulate the color of the voice; every atti- tude of the interpreter must be simple and sus- tained. He must have what is known as the "mercurial temperament" to assume every point of view and assimilate every feeling. The first great law of art is consistency, hence all the parts of a higher work of art must inhere, as do all parts of a plant or flower; but this unity and consistency should not be mechanical or arti- ficial. Delivery can never be built; it must grow. True expression must be spontaneous and free. One must enjoy a monologue; one must live it. Every act or inflection must suggest a dozen others that might be given. The fulness of the life within, in thinking and feeling, must be delicately sug- gested. The most important point to be con- sidered is a suggestion of the reality of life and the intensity of feeling. The interpreter must study nature. He must speak as the bird sings, not mechanically, but out of a full heart, yet not cha- otically or from random impulses. All his move- ments must come, like the blooming of the rose, from within outward; but this can only result from meditation and command of mind, body, and voice. "Everything in nature," said Carlyle, "has an index finger pointing to something beyond it"; so every phrase, every word, action, or pause, every voice modulation, must have a relation to every other modulation. In the art of interpreting the monologue, which is a different art from the writing of one, all must be as much like nature as possible. Yet this like- ness is secured, not by imitation or by reproducing 138 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue external experiences, but by sympathetic identifi- cation and imaginative realization. Every art has a technique. The modulations of the voice and the actions of the body must be directly studied, or there can be no naturalness. Meaningless movements and modulations lead to mannerisms. The reader must know the value of every action of voice or body, and so master them that he can bring them all into a kind of sub- conscious unity for the expression of the hving realization of a thought or situation. The interpreter must use no artificial methods, but must study the fundamental principles of the expressive modulations of voice and body and supplement these by a sympathetic observation of nature. The questions to be settled by the reader have been shown by the analysis of the structure of the monologue. He must first consider the character which he is to impersonate, and his conception of it must be definite and clear as that of any actor in a play. In one sense, conception of character is more important in the monologue than in the play, on account of the fact that the speaker stands alone, and the monologue is only one end of a conversa- tion. In a play the actor is always associated with others ; has some peculiarity of dress ; has freedom of movement, and his character is shown by others. He is only one of many persons in a moving scene, and often fills a subordinate place. But in the mon- ologue, the interpreter is never subordinate, and has few accessories, or none. He must not only reveal the character that is speaking, but also in- dicate the character of the supposed listener. He must suggest by simple sounds and movements, not Necessity of Oral Rendition 139 by make-up or artificial properties. Thus the interpretation of a monologue is more diflScult than that of a play. The actor has long periods of listening when another is speaking, so that he has better opportunities to show the impression pro- duced upon him by each idea. The interpreter of a monologue must often show that he, too, is lis- tening, and express the impression received from another. To illustrate the necessity of the vocal rendering of a monologue and the peculiar character of the interpretation needed, take one of the simplest examples, a humorous monologue of Douglas Jer- rold's, one of "Mrs. Caudle's Curtain Lectures." Take, for example, the lecture she gives after Mr. Caudle has lent an umbrella: MR. CAXJDLE HAS LENT AN ACQUAINTANCE THE FAMILY UMBRELLA Bah! That's the third umbrella gone since Christmas. "What were you to do ? " Why, let him go home in the rain, to be sure. I 'm very certain there was nothing about him that could spoil. Take cold, indeed ! He does n't look like one of the sort to take cold. Besides, he 'd have better taken cold than taken our only umbrella. Do you hear the rain, Mr. Caudle ? I say, do you hear the rain ? And as I 'm alive, if it is n't St. Swithin's day ! Do you hear it against the windows? Nonsense; you don't impose upon me. You can't be asleep with such a shower as that ! Do you hear it, I say ? Oh, you do hear it ! Well, that 's a pretty flood, I think, to last for six weeks ; and no stirring all the time out of the house. Pooh ! don't think me a fool, Mr. Caudle. Don't insult me. He return the um- brella ! Anybody would think you were bom yesterday. As if any- body ever did return an umbrella ! There — do you hear it ! Worse and worse ! Cats and dogs, and for six weeks, always six weeks. And no umbrella ! I should like to know how the children are to go to school to- morrow? They shan't go through such weather, I'm determined. 140 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue No ; they shall stop at home and never learn anything — the blessed creatures ! — sooner than go and get wet. And when they grow up, I wonder who they 'U have to thank for knowing nothing — who, indeed, but their father ? People who can't feel for their own chil- dren ought never to be fathers. But I know why you lent the umbrella. Oh, yes, I know very well. I was going out to tea at dear mother's to-morrow — you knew that ; and you did it on purpose. Don't tell me ; you hate me to go there, and take every mean advantage to hinder me. But don't you think it, Mr. Caudle. No, sir ; if it comes down in buckets-full, I 'U go all the more. No ; and I won't have a cab. Where do you think the money 's to come from ? You 've got nice high notions at that club of yours. A cab, Indeed ! Cost me sixteenpence at least — sixteenpence, two-and-eight-pence, for there's back again. Cabs, indeed ! I should like to know who's to pay for 'em; I can't pay for 'em, and I'm sure you can't, if you go on as you do; throwing away your property, and beggaring your children — buying um- brellas ! Do you hear the rain, Mr. Caudle ? I say, do you hear it ? But I don't care — I'U go to mother's to-morrow; I will; and what's more, I '11 walk evfery step of the way, — and you know that will give me my death. Don't call me a foolish woman, it 's you that 's the foolish man. You know I can't wear clogs ; and with no umbrella, the wet 's sure to give me a cold — it always does. But what do you care for that ? Nothing at all. I may be laid up, for what you care, as I daresay I shall — and a pretty doctor's bill there '11 be. I hope there will ! I should n't wonder if I caught my death ; yes : and that's what you lent the umbrella for. Of course ! . . . Men, indeed ! — call themselves lords of the creation ! — pretty lords, when they can't even take care of an umbrella ! I know that walk to-morrow will be the death of me. But that 's what you want — then you may go to your club and do as you like — and then, nicely my poor dear children will be used — but then, sir, you 'U be happy. Oh, don't tell me ! I know you will. Else you 'd never have lent the umbrella ! . . . The children, too! Dear things! They'll be sopping wet; for they shan't stop at home — they shan't lose their learning; it's all their father will leave 'em, I 'm sure. But they shall go to school. Don't tell me I said they should n't : • you are so aggravating. Caudle ; you 'd spoil the temper of an angel. They shall go to school ; mark that. And if they get their deaths of cold, it 's not my fault — I did n't lend the umbrella. Necessity of Oral Rendition 141 The peculiar character of Mrs. Caudle must be definitely conceived, and the interpreter must ex- press her feelings and reveal with great emphasis the impressions produced upon her, for these are the very soul of tne rendering. The sudden awak- ening of ideas in her mind, or the way she receives an impression, must be definitely shown, for such manifestations are the chief characteristics of a monologue. Such mental action is the one element that makes the delivery of a monologue differ from that of other forms of literature. The fact that one end of the conversation is omitted, or only echoed, concentrates our attention upon the workings of Mrs. Caudle's mind. The interpreter must vividly portray the arrival of every idea, the horrors with which she contemplates every successive conjecture. The reader must express Mrs. Caudle's aston- ishment after she has found out Mr. Caudle's oflfence. " ' What were you to do .? ' " is no doubt an echo of the question made by Mr. Caudle. Sar- castic surprise possesses her at the very thought of his asking such a question. "Let him go home in the rain, to be sure," is given with positiveness, as if it settled the whole matter. " Take cold, indeed ! " is also, no doubt, a sarcastic echo of Mr. Caudle's words. The abrupt explosion and extreme change from the preceding indicates clearly her repetition of Mr. Caudle's words. The pun: "He d have better taken cold than taken our umbrella," may sound hke a jest, but with Mrs. Caudle it is too sarcastic for a smile. Mrs. Caudle must "hear the rain" and appear startled. The thought of the following day causes sudden and extreme change of feeling, face, and 142 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue voice. Her wrath is aroused to a high pitch when Caudle snores or gives some evidence that he is asleep, and she is most abrupt and bitter in : " Non- sense; you don't impose upon me; you can't be asleep with such a shower as that." She repeats her question with emphasis. Then there must have been some groan or assent from poor Caudle, which is shown by a change of pitch and a sarcastic acceptance of his answer, "Oh, you do hear it!" Presently, Mr. Caudle causes another explosion by evidently suggesting that the borrower would re- turn the umbrella, "as if anybody ever did return an umbrella !" A dramatic imagination can easily realize the continuity of thought in Mrs. Caudle's mind, her expression of profound grief over the poor children, the sudden thought of " poor mother " that awakens in her the reason for his doing the terrible deed, and her self-pity. Every change must be expressed decidedly, to show the working of her mind. Such a monologue is decidedly dramatic, and to interpret it requires vivid imagination, quick perceptions, a realization of the relation of a spe- cific type of character to a distinct situation and the interaction of situation and character upon each other. The interpreter must have a very flexible voice and responsive body. He must have com- mand of the technique of expression and be able to suggest depth of meaning. It is easy enough to study a monologue super- ficially, and find its meaning for ourselves in a vague way, sufficient to satisfy us for the moment, but there is necessity for more study when we attempt to make the monologue clear and forcible to others. Necessity of Oral Rendition 143 The interpreter will discover, when he tries to read the monologue aloud, that his subjective studies were crude and inconclusive. He will find diflSculties in most unexpected places ; but as he contemplates the work with dramatic instinct, or im- aginative and sympathetic attention to each point, new light will dawn upon him. There is need al- ways for great power of accentuation. Discoveries should be sudden, and the connections vigorously sustained. The modulations of the voice must often be extreme, while yet suggesting the utmost naturalness. The length and abruptness of the inflections must change very suddenly. There must be breaks in the thought, with a startled discovery of many points, and extreme changes in pitch to show these. Some parts should go very slowly, while others should have great quickness of movement. Any serious monologue will serve to illustrate the necessity of vocal expression for its interpreta- tion. Take, for example. Browning's "Tray, ' and express the strong contrasts by the voice. TRAY Sing me a hero ! Quench my thirst Of soul, ye bards! Quoth Bard the first : "Sir Olaf, the good knight, did don His hekn and eke his habergeon ..." Sir Olaf and his bard. — ! "That sin-scathed brow" (quoth Bard the second), "That eye wide ope as though Fate beckoned My hero to some steep, beneath Which precipice smiled tempting Death. ..." You too without your host have reckoned ! 144 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue "A beggar-child" (let's hear this third!) "Sat on a quay's edge: like a bird Sang to herself at careless play, And fell into the stream. 'Dismay ! Help, you the stander-by ! ' None stirred. "Bystanders reason, think of wives And children ere they risk their lives. Over the balustrade has bounced A mere instinctive dog, and pounced Plumb on his prize. 'How well he dives ! "'Up he comes with the child, see, tight In mouth, alive too, clutched from quite A depth of ten feet — twelve, I bet ! Good dog ! What, off again ? There 's yet Another child to save ? All right ! "'How strange we saw no other fall ! It 's instinct in the animal. Good dog ! But he 's a long while under : If he got drowned I should not wonder — Strong current, that against the wall ! "'Here he comes, holds in mouth this time — What may the thing be ? Well, that 's prime ! Now, did you ever ? Reason reigns In man alone, since all Tray's pains Have fished — the child's doU from the slime ! ' "And so, amid the laughter gay, Trotted my hero off, — old Tray, — Till somebody, prerogatived With reason, reasoned: 'Why he dived, His brain would show us, I should say. "'John, go and catch — or, if needs be. Purchase that animal for me ! By vivisection, at expense Of haff-an-hour and eighteen pence, How brain secretes dog's soul, we '11 see ! '" This short poem well illustrates Browning's pecu- liar spirit and earnestness, and also the strong hold Necessity of Oral Rendition 145 which his chosen dramatic form had upon him. It was written as a protest against vivisection. Browning represents the speaker as one seeking for an expression among the poets of the true heroic spirit. "Bard the first" opens with the traditions and spirit of knighthood, but the speaker interrupts him suddenly in the midst of his first sentence, implying by his tone of disgust that such views of heroism are out of date. The second bard begins in the spirit of a later age, '"That sin-scathed brow . . . That eye wide ope, . . .' " and starts to portray a hero facing death on some precipice, but the speaker again interrupts. He is equally dissatisfied with this type of hero found in the pages of Byron or Bret Harte. When the third begins — "A beggar child," — the speaker indicates a sudden interest, "let's hear this third! " The speech of the third bard must be given with greater interest and simplicity, and in accordance with the spirit of the age, — the change from the extravagant to the perfectly simple and true, from the giant in his mail, or the desperado, to just a little child and a dog. Approval and tenderness should be shown by the modulations of the voice. Long, abrupt inflections express the excitement resulting from the discovery that the child has fallen into the stream, "Dismay ! Help." Then observe the sarcastic reference to human selfishness, and, in tender contrast to the action of the bystanders, old Tray is introduced, followed by the remarks of the on-lookers and their patronizing description of the dog's conduct. Notice that the quotation is long, and that the point 10 146 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue of view of the careless bystanders is preserved. The spirit of these bystanders is given in their own words until they laugh at old Tray's pains and blind instinct in fishing up the child's doll from the stream. Now follows the real spirit of bard the third, who portrays the sympathetic admiration for the dog. "'And so, amid tie laughter gay,' " requires a sudden change of key and tone-color to express the intensity of feeling and the general appreciation of the mystery of "a mere instinctive dog." The poem closes with an example of the cold, analytic spirit of the age, that hopes to settle the deepest problems merely by experiment. "'By vivisection, at expense. Of half-an-hour and eighteen pence. How brain secretes dog's soul, we 'U see ! "" The student will soon discover that the mono- logue is not only a new literary or poetic form, but that it demands a new histrionic method of repre- sentation. The monologue should be taken seriously. It is not an accidental form, the odd freak of some pe- culiar writer. Browning has said that he never intended his poetry to be a substitute for an after- dinner cigar. A similar statement is true of all great monologues. A few so-called monologues on a low plane can be understood and rendered by any one. Every form of dramatic art has its cari- cature and perversion. Burlesque seems necessary as a caricature of all forms of dramatic art and so there are burlesques of monologues. These, how- ever, must not blind the eyes to the existence of Actions of Mind and Voice 147 monologues on the highest plane. Many mono- logues, though short and seemingly simple, probe the profoundest depths of the human soul. Such require patient study; imagination, sympathetic insight, and passion are all necessary in their interpretation. X. ACTIONS OF MIND AND VOICE The complex and difficult language of vocal ex- pression cannot, of course, be explained in such a book as this, but there are a few points which are of especial moment in considering the monologue. Ail vocal expression is the revelation of the proc- esses of thinking or the elemental actions of the mind. The meaning of the expressive modulations of the voice must be gained from a study of the actions of the mind and their expression in common conversation. While words are conventional sym- bols, modulations of the voice are natural signs, which accompany the pronunciation of words, and are necessary elements of natural speech. Such expressive modulations of the voice as in- flections are developed in the child before words. Hence, vocal expression can never be acquired from mechanical rules or by imitation. As the mono- logue reveals primarily the thinking and feehng of a living character, it affords a very important means of studying vocal expression. In all dramatic work there is a temptation to assume merely outward bearings and characteris- tics, attitudes, and tones without making the char- acter think. The monologue is a direct revelation of the mind and can be interpreted only by natu- rally expressing the thought. 148 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue The interpreter of the monologue must reveal the point of view of his character, and must show the awakening or arrival of every idea. All changes in point of view, the simplest transitions in feeling and impressions produced by an idea, must be sug- gested. The mental hfe, in short, must be genu- inely and definitely revealed by the actions of voice and body. The first sign or expression of life is rhythm. All hfe begins and ends in rhythm, and accordingly, rhythm is the basis of all naturalness. In vocal expression the rhythmic process of thinking, the successive focussing and leaping of the mind from idea to idea, must be revealed by the rhythmic alter- nation in speech of pause and touch. Without these, genuine thinking cannot be ex- pressed in speaking. The pause indicates the stay of attention ; the touch locates or aflfirms the centre of concentration. The mind receives an impression in silence, and speech follows as a natural result. The interpretation of a poem or any work of hter- ature demands an intensifying of the processes of thinking, and the pause and touch constitute the language by which this increase of thinking is ex- pressed. A language is always necessary to the completion or, at least, to the accentuation of, any mental action. The impression received from each successive idea must be so vivid as to dominate the rhythm of breathing, and the expansion and other actions of the body. The progressive movement of mind from idea to idea implies consequent variation and discrimina- tion more or less vigorous. This is revealed by change of pitch in passing from idea to idea or phrase to phrase, and the extent of this variation is Actions of Mind and Voice 149 due, as a rule, to the degree of discrimination in thinking. In the employment of these three modulations, pause, touch, and change of pitch, each implies the others. The degree of change in pitch and the vigor of touch justify the length of pause. Length- ening the pause without increasing the touch suggests tameness, sluggishness, or dullness of thought. Notice the long pauses, the intense strokes of the voice, and the decided changes of pitch harmoni- ously accentuated, which are employed to indicate the depth of passion in rendering "In a Year" (p. 201). Pauses are of special importance in a monologue. This woman shows by long pauses and abrupt changes her struggle to comprehend the real meaning of the coldness of the man whom she loves, — to whom she has given all. The touch and the changes of pitch show the abruptness and the intensity of her passion. The careful student will further perceive an in- flection in conversation, or change of pitch, during the utterance of the central vowel of each word, and a longer inflection in the word standing for a central idea. Inflections show the relations of ideas to each other, the logical method, the relative value of centres of attention, and the like. Marked changes of topics, for example, will be indicated by a long inflection upon the key-word. In rendering Browning's "One Way of Love," the word "rose" in the first line is given sahency. It is the centre of his first effort. Note the long pause followed by decided rising inflections on the words : "She will not turn aside? . . ." 150 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue succeeded by a pause with a firm fall, — "Alas ! Let them lie. . . ." In the second stanza, note the falling inflection upon "lute," which introduces a new theme, a new endeavor to win her love. Then follows another disappointment with suspensive or rising inflections denoting surprise with agitation, and then new real- ONE WAY OF LOVE All June I bound the rose in sheaves. Now, rose by rose, I strip the leaves And strow them where Pauline may pass. She will not turn aside ? Alas ! Let them lie. Suppose they die ? The chance was they might take her eye. How many a month I strove to suit These stubborn fingers to the lute ! To-day I venture all I know. She will not hear my music ? So ! Break the string; fold music's wing: Suppose Pauline had bade me sing ! My whole life long I learn 'd to love. This hour my utmost art I prove And speak my passion — heaven or hell ? She will not give me heaven ? 'T is well ! Lose who may — I still can say, Those who win heaven, bless'd are they ! ization of failure with a falling inflection indicating submission. The same is true of the word "love" in the last stanza which brings one to the climax of the poem. This has a long, firm falling inflection. Note the suspensive intense rise upon "heaven" and the falling on "hell." The question: "She will not give me heaven? . . ." Actions of Mind and Voice 151 reiterates the earlier questions, only with greater grief and intensity. The character of his "love," which a poor reader may slight, neglect, or wholly pervert, must suggest the nobility of the man, and the last words must reveal his intensity, tenderness, and, especially, his self-control and hopeful dignity. Note in Browning's "Confessions' (p. 7) that the rising inflections on the first words indicate doubt or uncertainty, and seem to say, "Did I hear aright?" But the firm falling inflection in the answer, "Ah, reverend sir, not I!" indicates that the speaker has settled the doubt and now expresses his protest against such a view of life. The inflections after this become more colloquial. There is, however, still a suggestion of earnestness as the description continues until at the last a de- cided inflection on the word "sweet" expresses his real conviction. Though life may appear but vanity to his listener, such is not his experience. The modulations of the voice in speaking "sad and bad and mad" can show that they embody his hearers' opinions and convictions, not his own, and "it was sweet!" can be given to show that they are his own. Inflection, especially in union with pause, serves an important function in indicating the saliency of specific ideas or words. Note, for example, in Browning's "The Italian in England" that in the phrase " That second time they hunted me," there is a specific emphasis on "second." This word shows that he is talking of his many trials when in Italy and the narrowness of his escape, while also indicating some other time when he was hunted by 152 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue the Austrians. This sentence, and especially this word "second," should be given the pointedness of conversation, and then wul naturally follow the account of his escape. In this poem, Browning suggests what diflSculties were encountered by the Italian patriots who labored to free their country from Austrian rule. It is a strange and unique story told in London to some one who is planning with the speaker for Itahan hberty. THE ITALIAN IN ENGLAND That second time they hunted me From hill to plain, from shore to sea. And Austria, hounding far and wide Her blood-hounds thro' the country-side. Breathed hot an instant on my trace, — I made, six days, a hiding-place Of that dry green old aqueduct Where I and Charles, when boys, have plucked The fire-flies from the roof above. Bright creeping thro' the moss they love: — How long it seems since Charles was lost ! Six days the soldiers crossed and crossed The country in my very sight; And when that peril ceased at night. The sky broke out in red dismay With signal-fires. Well, there I lay Close covered o'er in my recess, Up to the neck in ferns and cress, Thinking on Mettemich our friend. And Charles's miserable end, And much beside, two days; the third. Hunger o'ercame me when I heard The peasants from the village go To work among the maize; you know. With us in Lombardy, they bring Provisions packed on mules, a string With little bells that cheer their task. And casks, and boughs on every cask Actions of Mind and Voice 1 53 To keep the sun's heat from the wine; These I let pass in jingling line, And, close on them, dear, noisy crew. The peasants from the village, too; For at the very rear would troop Their wives and sisters in a group To help, I knew. When these had passed, I threw my glove to strike the last. Taking the chance : she did not start. Much less cry out, but stooped apart, One instant rapidly glanced round. And saw me beckon from the ground. A wild bush grows and hides my crypt; She picked my glove up while she stripped A branch off, then rejoined the rest With that; my glove lay in her breast. Then I drew breath; they disappeared: It was for Italy I feared. An hour, and she returned alone Exactly where my glove was thrown. Meanwhile came many thoughts: on me Rested the hopes of Italy. I had devised a certain tale Which, when 't was told her, could not fail Persuade a peasant of its truth; • I meant to call a freak of youth This hiding, and give hopes of pay. And no temptation to betray. But when I saw that woman's face. Its calm simplicity of grace. Our Italy's own attitude In which she walked thus far, and stood, Planting each naked foot so firm. To crush the snake and spare the worm — At first sight of her eyes, I said, "I am that man upon whose head They fix the price, because I hate The Austrians over us; the State Will give you gold — oh, gold so much ! — If you betray me to their clutch. And be your death, for aught I know. 154 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue If once they find you saved their foe. Now, you must bring me food and drink, And also paper, pen and ink, And carry safe what I shall write To Padua, which you '11 reach at night Before the duomo shuts; go in. And wait till Tenebrse begin; Walk to the third confessional. Between the pillar and the wall, And kneeling whisper, 'Whence comes peace? ' Say it a second time, then cease ; And if the voice inside returns, 'From Christ and Freedom; what concerns The cause of Peace? " for answer, slip My letter where you placed your lip; Then come back happy we have done Our mother service — I, the son. As you the daughter of our land ! " Three mornings more, she took her stand In the same place, with the same eyes: I was no surer of sun-rise Than of her coming. We conferred Of her own prospects, and I heard She had a lover — stout and tall, She said ■•— then let her eyelids fall, "He could do much " — as if some doubt Entered her heart, — then, passing out, "She could not speak for others; who Had other thoughts; herself she knew:" And so she brought me drink and food. After four days, the scouts pursued Another path ; at last arrived The help my Paduan friends contrived To furnish me : she brought the news. For the first time I could not choose But kiss her hand, and lay my own Upon her head — "This faith was shown To Italy, our mother, she Uses my hand and blesses thee." She followed down to the sea-shore; I left and never saw her more. Actions of Mind and Voice 155 How very long since I have thought Concerning — ^ much less wished for — aught Beside the good of Italy. For which I live and mean to die ! I never was in love; and since Charles proved false, what shall now convince My inmost heart I have a friend ? However, if I pleased to spend Real wishes on myself — say, three — I know at least what one should be I would grasp Metternich until I felt his red wet throat distil In blood thro' these two hands. And next, — Nor much for that am I perplexed — Charles, perjured traitor, for his part, Should die slow of a broken heart Under his new employers. Last — Ah, there, what should I wish ? For fast Do I grow old and out of strength. If I resolved to seek at length My father's house again, how scared They all would look, and unprepared ! My brothers live in Austria's pay — Disowned me long ago, men say ; And all my early mates who used To praise me so — perhaps induced More than one early step of mine — Are turning wise: while some opine "Freedom grows license," some suspect "Haste breeds delay," and recollect They always said, such premature Beginnings never could endure ! So, with a sullen "All's for best," The land seems settling to its rest. I think then, I should wish to stand This evening in that dear, lost land. Over the sea the thousand miles And know if yet that woman smiles With the calm smile ; some little farm She lives in there, no doubt: what harm If I sat on the door-side bench. And while her spindle made a trench 156 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Fantastically in the dust, Inquired of all her fortunes — just Her children's ages and their names, And what may be the husband's aims For each of them. I 'd talk this out. And sit there, for an hour about. Then kiss her hand once more, and lay Mine on her head, and go my way. So much for idle wishing — how It steals the time ! To business now. The conversation takes place prehrninary "to business." It is a fine example of the monologue for many reasons. It takes simply a single moment in life, a moment in this case when a turn is made from serious business into personal experiences. The speaker is probably waiting for other reformers to take active measures for the Uberation of his country. In this moment, seemingly wasted, light is thrown upon the inner life of this patriot. This beautiful example of Browning's best work will serve as a good illustration of the force and power of a monologue to interpret life and char- acter and also the elements necessary to its delivery. The student will do well to thoroughly master it, noting every emphatic word and the necessity of long pauses and salient inflections to make manifest the inner thought and feeling of this man. From such a theme some may infer that the mon- ologue portrays accidental parts of human life, but Browning in this poem has given deep insight into a great struggle for liberty. Such irrelevant words spoken even on the verge of what seems to us the greater business of hfe may more definitely indicate character, and on account of the fact that they spring up spontaneously may reveal men more com- pletely than when they proceed "to business." Actions of Mind and Voice ^51 Note the importance of inflection in "Wanting is — what ? " In giving " Wanting is — " there is a suspensive action of the voice with an abrupt pause, as if the speaker were going to continue with "every- where" or something of the kind. The dash helps to indicate this. The idea is still incomplete, when the attitude of the mind totally changes, and he gives a very strong and abrupt rise in "what," as if to say : " Will you, Browning, with your opti- mistic beliefs, utter a note of despair.?" The un- derstanding of the whole poem, of the passing from one point of view to another, depends upon the way in which this abrupt change of thought in the first short line is given by the voice. WANTING IS — WHAT? Wanting is — what ? Summer redundant, Blueness abundant, — Where is the blot ? Beamy the world, yet a blank all the same, — Framework which waits for a picture to frame: What of the leafage, what of the flower ? Roses embowering with naught they embower ! Come then, complete incompletion, O Comer, Pant through the blueness, perfect the summer ! Breathe but one breath Rose-beauty above, And all that was death Grows life, grows love, Grows love ! Change of point of view, situation, or emotion is revealed by a change in the modulation of the resonance of the voice, or tone-color. In this poem, note the joyous, confident feeling in the short lines, beginning with the word "what," then after a long pause, the change in key and resonance to the re- 158 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue gret and despair expressed in the first of the long lines. Then there is a passing to a point of view above both the optimistic and pessimistic attitudes which have been contrasted. This truer attitude accepts the dark facts, but sees deeper than the external, and prays for the "Comer" and the trans- figuring of all despair and death into life and love. Note also the importance of pause after a long falling inflection on the word "roses " to indicate an answer to the previous question. The first two words of the poem, this word, and the contrast of the three moods by tone- color are the chief points in the interpretation. Read over again also "One Way of Love" (p. 150), and note that there are not merely changes in inflection in passing from the successive ques- tions and from disappointment to acquiescence, but change also in the texture or tone-color of the voice. This contrast in tone- color becomes still more marked in the last stanza between the vigorous suspense and disappointment in "She will not give me heaven? . . ." and the heroic resignation of "'Tis well!" with a change of key still more marked. Between these clauses there is a long pause and an extreme change of pitch which are suggestive of the intensity of his sorrow as well as of the nobility and dignity of his character. He does not exclaim contemptuously, that "the grapes are green." Everywhere we find that changes in situation, dramatic points of view, imaginative relations, sympathetic attitudes of mind, or feeling resulting from whatever cause, are expressed by correspond- ing changes in the modulations of the texture or Actions of Mind and Voice 1 59 resonance of the tone, which may here be called tone- color. One of the most elemental characteristics of con- versation is the flexible variation of the successive rhythmic pulsations, that is to say, the movement. This variation is especially necessary in all dra- matic expression. One clause will move very slowly, and show deliberative thinking, impor- tance, weight, a more dignified point of view or firm control ; another will be given rapidly, as indicative of triviality, mere formality, uncontrollable excite- ment, lack of weight and sympathy, or of subordi- nation and disparagement. A slow movement indicates what is weighty and important; a rapid one excitement or what is unimportant. These are the elements of naturalness or the expressive modulations of the voice in every-day conversation. For the rendering of no other form of literature is the study and mastery of these ele- ments so necessary as in that of the monologue. Monologues are so infinitely varied in character, they reproduce so definitely all the elements of con- versation, even requiring them to be accentuated; they embody such sudden transitions in thought and feeling, such contrasts in the attitude of the mind, that a thorough command of the voice is necessary for their interpretation. Not only must the modulations of the voice be studied to render the monologue, but a thorough study of the monologue becomes a great help in developing power in vocal expression. Because of the necessary accentuation of otherwise overlooked points in vocal expression, the orator or the teacher, the reader or the actor, can be led to understand and realize more adequately those expressive mod- i6o Browning and the Dramatic Monologue ulations upon the mastery of which all naturalness in speaking depends. Not only must we appreciate the distinct mean- ing of each of these modulations, but also that of their combination and degrees of accentuation, which indicate marked transitions in feeling and situation. In fact, no voice modulation is ever perceived in isolation. They may not all be found in a sentence, but some of them cannot be present without others. For example, touch is meaningless without pause, and a pause is justified by change of pitch. Inflection and change of pitch constitute the elements of vocal form which reveal thought, and all combine with tone- color and movement, which reveal feeling and experience. Naturalness is the right union and combination of all the modulations. MEMORABILIA Ah, did you once see Shelley plain. And did he stop and speak to you. And did you speak to him again ? How strange it seems, and new ! But you were living before that. And also you are living after; And the memory I started at — My starting moves your laughter ! I crossed a moor, with a name of its own And a certain use in the wo'rld, no doubt. Yet a hand's-breadth of it shines alone 'Mid the blank miles round about: For there I picked up on the heather And there I put inside my breast A moulted feather, an eagle-feather ! Well, I forget the rest. Read over any short monologue several times and satisfactorily locate and define the meaning Actions of Mind and Voice i6i of each of these modulations. Observe also the great variety of changes among these modulations and their necessary union for right interpretation. Take for example " Memorabilia," one of Brown- ing's shortest monologues, and observe in every phrase the nature and necessity of these modula- tions of the voice. The reading of a volume of Shelley is said to have greatly influenced Browning when a boy, and this monologue is a tribute to that poet. Some lover of Shelley, possibly Browning himself, meets one who has seen Shelley face to face. He is agitated at the thought of facing one who had been in the presence of that marvellous man. Note the abrupt inflec- tions, the quick movement indicating excitement, the decided touches, and animated changes of pitch. At the seventh Une a great break is indicated by a dash. The speaker seems to be going on to say : "The memory I started at must have been the greatest event of your life." But as he notes the action of the other, the contemptuous smile at his enthusiasm, perhaps a sarcastic remark about Shelley, there is a sudden, abrupt pause after "started at" which is given with a rising or sus- pensive inflection. "My starting" has extreme change in pitch, color, and movement. Astonish- ment is mingled with disappointment and grief. Then follows a still greater transition. In the last eight lines of the poem, the speaker, after a long pause, possibly turning slightly away from the other and becoming more subjective, in a slow move- ment and a total change of tone-color, pays a noble, poetic, and grateful tribute to the object of his admiration. He carefully weighs every word, 11 1 62 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue and accentuates his thought with long pauses, and decided touches upon the words . He gives " moor ' ' a long falling inflection, pausing after it to suggest that he meant more than a moor, possibly all modern or EngUsh literature or poetry. He adds "... with a name of its own And a certain use in the world, no doubt," as a reference to English poetry or literature and to show that he was not ignorant of its beauties and glories. Still stronger emphasis should be given to " hand's-breadth," with a pause after it, subordi- nating the next words, for he is trying to bring his listener indirectly up to the thought of Shelley. "Miles" may also receive an accent in contrast to " hand's-breadth." Then there is great tenderness : "For there I picked up . . ." Note the change in the resonance of the voice and the low and dignified movement. There is a long inflection, followed by a pause on the word "feather" and a still longer one on the word "eagle." Now follows another extreme transition. Thought and feeling change. He comes back to the familiarity of conversation. He shows uncer- tainty or hesitation by inflection and a long pause after the word "Well." He has no word of dispar- agement of other writers, but simply adds, "Well, I forget the rest." All else is forgotten in contemplating that one precious "feather" which is, of course, Shelley's poetry. It is impossible to indicate in words all the mental and emotional actions, or the modulations of the Actions of Mind and Voice 163 voice necessary to express them. The more com- plex the imaginative conditions, the more all these modulations are combined. Notice that change of movement, of key, and also of tone- color combine to express extreme changes in situation, feeling, or direction of attention. When there is a very strong emphatic inflection, there is usually an emphatic pause after it. Wherever there is a long pause there is always a salient change of pitch or some variation in the expression to justify it. After an emphatic pause when words are closely connected, there is always a decided subordination, and thus a whole sentence, or, by a series of such changes, an entire poem, is given unity of atmosphere, coloring, and form. No rules can be laid down for such artistic ren- dering; for the higher the poetry and the deeper the feeling, the less applicable is any so-called rule. Only the deepest principles can be of lasting use. Take, for example, Browning's epilogue to " The Two Poets of Croisic," printed also by him in his book of selections under the title of "A Tale:" A TALE What a pretty tale you told me Once upon a time — Said you found it somewhere (scold me !) Was it prose or was it rhyme, Greek or Latin ? Greek, you said, While your shoulder propped my head. Anyhow there 's no forgetting This much if no more. That a poet (pray, no petting !) Yes, a bard, sir, famed of yore. Went where suchlike used to go. Singing for a prize, you know. 164 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue Well, he had to sing, nor merely Sing but play the lyre; Playing was important clearly Quite as singing: I desire, Sir, you keep the fact in mind For a purpose that 's behind. There stood he, while deep attention Held the judges round, — Judges able, I should mention. To detect the slightest sound Sung or played amiss: such ears Had old judges, it appears ! None the less he sang out boldly, Played in time and tune. Till the judges, weighing coldly Each note's worth, seemed, late or soon, Sure to smUe "In vain one tries Picking faults out : take the prize ! " When, a mischief ! Were they seven Strings the lyre possessed ? Oh, and afterwards eleven. Thank you ! Well, sir, — who had guessed Such iU luck in store ? — it happed One of those same seven strings snapped. All was lost, then ! No ! a cricket (What "cicada"? Pooh!) — Some mad thing that left its thicket For mere love of music — flew With its little heart on fire. Lighted on the crippled lyre. So that when (Ah joy!) our singer For his truant string Feels with disconcerted finger. What does cricket else but fling Fiery heart forth, sound the note Wanted by the throbbing throat ? Actions of Mind and Voice 165 Ay and, ever to the ending, Cricket chirps at need. Executes the hand's intending, Promptly, perfectly, — indeed Saves the singer from defeat With her chirrup low and sweet. TiU, at ending, all the judges Cry with one assent "Take the prize — a prize who grudges Such a voice and instrument? Why, we took your lyre for harp. So it shrilled us forth F sharp ! " Did the conqueror spurn the creature. Once its service done ? That 's no such uncommon feature In the case when Music's son Finds his Lotte's power too spent For aiding soul-development. No ! This other, on returning Homeward, prize in hand, Satisfied his bosom's yearning: (Sir, I hope you understand !) — Said "Some record there must be Of this cricket's help to me ! " So, he made himself a statue: Marble stood, life-size; On the lyre, he pointed at you. Perched his partner in the prize; Never more apart you found Her, he throned, from him, she crowned. That 's the tale : its application ? Somebody I know Hopes one day for reputation Thro' his poetry that 's — Oh, All so learned and so wise And deserving of a prize ! 1 66 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue If he gains one, will some ticket, When his statue 's built. Tell the gazer "'T was a cricket Helped my crippled lyre, whose lilt Sweet and low, when strength usurped Softness' place i' the scale, she chirped ? "For as victory was nighest, While I sang and played, — With my l)Te at lowest, highest. Right alike, — one string that made 'Love' sound soft was snapt in twain. Never to be heard again, — "Had not a kind cricket fluttered, Perched upon the place Vacant left, and duly uttered 'Love, Love, Love,' whene'er the bass Asked the treble to atone For its somewhat sombre drone." But you don't know music ! Wherefore Keep on casting pearls To a — poet ? AH I care for Is — to tell him that a girl's "Love" comes aptly in when gruff Grows his singing. (There, enough !) We have a suggestion of the position of the speaker, a woman upon the arm of the chair of her lover or husband. How pointed and simple is the first statement: "Scold me!" an apology for not remembering or for not having given more atten- tion. The humorous or pretended effort to remem- ber whether it was prose or rhyme, Greek or Latin, is given by slow, gradual inflections followed by a marked, abrupt inflection upon the word " Greek," as if she were absolutely sure of that point and her memory of it definite. Again, note toward the last, how the impression of his pretending not to Actions of Mind and Voice 167 understand causes her to give a humorous- and abrupt emphasis to the point of her story. The flexibihty and great variety in the modu- lations of the voice requisite in the interpretation of a monologue will be made clear by comparing such a monologue with some short poem which suggests a speech. Byron's "To Tom Moore," though there is one speaker, is not a monologue. "My boat is on the shore, And my bark is on the sea; But before I go, Tom Moore, Here's a double health to thee." It is a kind of after-dinner speech, or lyric full of feeling, an imaginative proposal by Byron of a health to Tom Moore. But Moore is not expected to say anything. Byron is dominated entirely by his own mood. It is therefore quite lyric and not at all dramatic. Note how intense but regular are the rhythmic pulsations, the pause and the touch. While there are changes of pitch and in- flection, variety of movement and tone-color, yet all of these are used in a very simple and ordi- nary sense. There is none of that extreme use of inflection, pause or tone- color found in Brown- ing's "Memorabilia." The difference between the modulations of the voice in a monologue and in a play should be noted. Take, for example, the words of the Archbishop in "Henry V" regarding the character of the King. They are addressed to friends in conversation and are almost a speech. They have the force of a judicial decision and are given with a great deal of emphasis as well as with logical continuity of ideas. But this emphasis is regular and simple. It can be 1 68 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue noted in any animated or emphatic conversation, and the argument of the speech may be studied to advantage by speakers on account of the few and sahent or emphatic ideas. In rendering some monologues, however, which embody the same ideas, such as the "Memora- bilia " (see p. 160), which has been made the central illustration of this chapter, greater range, greater abruptness in transitions, more and greater com- plexity of the modulations of the voice as well as sudden and strong impressions are required of the reader. He should read both passages in contrast, and note the difference in delivery. One distinct pecuharity of the monologue is the fact that it can give a past event from a dramatic point of view. Note, for example, that in Jean Ingelow's familiar poem, "The High Tide on the Coast of Lincolnshire," the first stanza gives us the spirit or movement of the whole poem. The first line, "The old mayor climbed the belfiy tower," emphasizes the excitement. A definite situation is set before us, and we can see, too, why the events are given as belonging to the past. A vivid impression of the high tide along the whole coast of Lincolnshire is afforded by its relation to one humble cottage and family. An old grandmother tells the story long after the events have blended in her mind into one lasting tragic impression. This brings the whole poem into unity, makes a distinct, concrete picture and a most impressive poetic, not to say dramatic, interpretation of the event. The author by presenting this old mother talk- Actions of Mind and Voice 169 ing about her beloved daughter-in-law, Elizabeth, with "her two bairns," and the excited race of the son to reach home before she went for the cows, appeals to sympathy and feeling, awakens imagina- tion, and presents not only a vivid and specific picture, but such distinct types of character as to make the event real. The poem is a fine example of the union of lyric and dramatic imagination. The speaker becomes more and more excited and animated as she gives her memories of the suc- cessive events, but in the midst of each event re- lapses into grief. Again and again at the close of stanzas, a single clause or line indicates her emo- tion, rather than her memory of the exciting events. The event is portrayed dramatically, but these last lines are decidedly lyric. After the excited calling of "Elizabeth! Elizabeth!" by her son the very name seems to awaken tenderness in her heart, and she utters this deep lyric conviction : — "A sweeter woman n'er drew breath Than my Sonne's wife, Elizabeth." The son, when he reaches home after his excited chase to save his wife, looks across the grassy lea, — "To right, to left," and cries "Ho.Enderby!" For at that moment he hears the bells ring "En- derby !" which seem to be the knell of his hopes. The next hne, "They rang 'The Brides of Enderby,'" expresses the emotion of the grandmother as she recalls the effect of the bells upon her son, and possibly her own awakening to the meaning of the 170 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue tune which has taken such deep hold of her imagi- nation, and becomes naturally the central point of the calamity in her memory. The poem brings into direct contrast the excited realization of each event and her feehng over the disaster as a whole. The first is dramatic; the second, lyric. The mother realizes dramatically her son's exclamations and feelings, but the hne "They rang 'The Brides of Enderby '" is purely lyric and expressive of her own feeling in remembrance of the danger. The climax of the dramatic movement of the story comes in the intense realization of the per- sonal danger to herself and her son when they saw the mighty tidal wave rolling up the river Lindis, which "Sobbed in the grasses at our feet: The feet had hardly time to flee Before it brake against the knee." Then the poet does not mention the son's efforts in her behalf, the flight to the roof of their dwelhng in the midst of the waves, and makes a sudden transi- tion again from the dramatic situation to the lyric spirit as she moans with no thought of herself: "And all the world was in the sea." Another sudden transition in the poem is in- dicated by a mere dash after "And I — " Starting to relate her own experience with a loving mother's instinct she turns instead to the grief of her son, — "... my Sonne was at my side, And yet he moaned beneath his breath." This is followed by another passionate dramatic climax, — Actions of Mind and Voice 171 "And didst thou visit him no more ? Thou didst, thou didst, my daughter deare, The waters laid thee at his doore. Ere yet the early dawn was clear. Thy pretty bairns in fast embrace. The lifted sun shone on thy face, Down drifted to thy dwelling-place." Here feeling is deepest in the speaker, and in the listener, and, of course, in the reader. The rest of the poem is a sweet and mournful lyric: "I shall never hear her more Where the reeds and rushes quiver." The poem closes with a crooning over Elizabeth's song as the aged woman heard it for the last time. Many public readers centre their whole interest in the imitation or mere representation of this song, and all the fervor of the piece is made accidental to this. But such a method centres all attention in mere vocal skill, to the loss, if not to the perversion of its spirit. This song must not be given literally, but in the character of the aged speaker. It lives in the old mother's mind as a heart-breaking memory, and any artificial or literal rendering of it destroys the illusion or the true impression of the poem. It should be given in a very subdued tone with the least possible suggestion, if any at all, of the music of the song. The first stanza is apt also to be given out of character. It is a burst of passionate remembrance and must be given carefully as the overture em- bodying the spirit of the whole. When the grand- mother is asked by the interlocutor regarding the story, she breaks into sudden excitement, and then gradually passes into the quieter mood of reminiscence. After that, the poem is rhythmic 1 72 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue alternation between her memory of the exciting events, and her own experiences ; in short, a co- ordination of the lyric and the dramatic spirit. The study of this poem affords a fine illustration of movement, — similar to that of a great sym- phony. The long pauses, sudden transitions in pitch and color, and especially the pulsations of feeling, when given in harmony illustrate the marvellous power of the human voice. XI. ACTIONS OF MIND AND BODY As the monologue is a form of dramatic expression, it necessarily implies action, — the most dramatic of all languages. Dramatic expression, in its very nature, implies life, and life is shown by movement. For this reason action is in some sense the primary or most necessary language required for dramatic interpretation. Action is a language that belongs to the whole body. As light moves quickest in the outer world, so action, — the language that appeals to the eye — is the first appeal to consciousness. Life expands, — the gleaming eye, the elevated and gravitating body, the lifted hand, — all these show character and a living or present realization of ideas, and are most important in the monologue. On account of the abrupt opening of most mono- logues, the first clause requires salient and decided action. The speaker must locate his hearer, and must often indicate, by some decided movement, the effect produced upon him by some previous speech which has to be imagined. As the words Actions of Mind and Body 173 of the listener are not given but must be suggested, it is necessary that the action be decided. Though action or pantomime always precedes speech, this precedence is especially pronounced in monologues. Notice, for example, in Bret Harte's "In a Tunnel," the look of surprise and astonishment followed by the words given with long rising inflections : " Did n't know Flynn ?" "Didn't know Flynn — Flynn of Virginia — -long as he's been 'yar ? Look 'ee here, stranger, whar hev you been ? "Here in this tunnel, — he was my pardner, that same Tom Flynn — working together, in wind and weather, day out and in. "Did n't know Fljmn! Well, that is queer. Why, it's a sin to think of Tom Fljrnn — Tom with his cheer, Tom without fear, — stranger, look 'yar ! "Thar in the drift back to the wall he held the timbers ready to fall; then in the darkness I heard him call — 'Run for your life, Jake ! Run for your wife's sake ! Don't wait for me.' And that was all, heard in the din, heard of Tom Flynn, — Flynn of Virginia. "That 's all about Flynn of Virginia — that lets me out here in the damp — out of the sun — that ar' dern'd lamp makes my eyes run. "Well, there — I'm done! But, sir, when you'll hear the next fool asking of Flynn — Flynn of Virginia — just you chip in, say you knew Flynn ; say that you 've been 'yar." The look of wonder is sustained until there is a change to an intense, pointed inquiry : " Whar hev you been.''" The intense surprise reveals the rough character of the speaker, a miner in a mining camp, and his admiration for Flynn, who has saved his life. Then note the sudden transition as he begins his story. His character must be main- tained, and expressed by action through all the many transitions ; but in the first clause especially there must be a pause with a long continued atti- tude of astonishment. Action is required to present this vivid scene which is suggested by only a few words, the admira- 174 Browning and the Dramatic Monologue tion of the speaker for Flynn, who in the depths of the mine, with but a moment to decide, gives his hf e for another. The hero calls out " Run for your wife's sake," the heart of the speaker warms with admiration and the tears come; then the rough Westerner is seen brushing away his tears and at- tributing the water in his eyes to the "dern'd lamp." Truth in depicting human nature, depth of feeling, action, character, in short, the whole meaning, is dependent upon the decided actions of the body and the inflections of the voice directly associated with, these. In "The Itahan in England " (p. 152), the word "second" not only needs emphasis by the voice, as has been shown, to indicate that the speaker has already given an account of another experience, but he may possibly throw up his hands to indicate something unusual, something beyond words in the experience he is about to relate. It is especially necessary in the monologue that action should show the discovery, arrival, or initia- tion of ideas. A change in the direction *of atten- tion, a new subject or current of ideas, cannot be indicated wholly by vocal expression. The mental conjectures of Mrs. Caudle, for example, are very pronounced, and cannot be fully expressed by the voice without action. Notice how definitely action, in union with vocal expression, shows whether Mrs. Caudle's new im- pressions are due to the natural association of ideas in her mind, or to the words or conduct of Caudle. The last mentioned give rise to her explosiveness, withering sarcasm, and anger. Such discrimina- tions produce the illusion of the scene. In "Up at a Villa — Down in the City " (p. 65), Actions of Mind and Body 1 75 notice how necessary it is for the interpreter to show the direction of his attention, whether he is speaking regarding his villa or the city. Note the disgust and attitude of gloom in his face and bear- ing as he gazes towards his villa. " Over-smoked behind by the faint gray olive-trees," suggests a picture calling for admiration from us, but not from him. To him the tulip is a great "bubble of blood." All this receives a definite tone-color, and it must be borne in mind that with- out action of the body, the quality of the voice will not change. The emotion diffuses itself through the whole organism of the impersonator of the "person of quality," and even hands, feet, and face are given a certain attitude by this emotion. Con- tempt for the villa will depress his whole body and thus color his tone. On the contrary, when the speaker turns to the city, his face hghts up. The "fountain — to splash," the "houses in four straight lines," the "fanciful signs which are painted prop- erly," — all these are apparently contemplated by him with such an expansion and elevation of his body as almost to cause laughter. This contrast, which is sustained through the whole monologue, can