^liamiisssssaBim fir 9 CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Gift in memory of MARY STEPHENS SHERMAN, 'n from JOHN H. SHERMAN, 'H HF5386 .P1™"lS"i'j*'-'"V Library Trade-morals, *-: \c\M TRADE-MORALS '»..,, , i :,y ', *■ , <■,. r- . -J. *„ PAGE LECTURES Published by Yale University Press. MORALS IN MODERN BUSINESS. The contents include: Intro- ductiou by Ripley Hitchcock; The Morals of Trade in the Making by Edward D. Page; Production by George W. Alger; Competition by Henry Holt ; Credit and Banking by A. Barton Hepburn ; Public Service by Edward W. Bemis ; Corporate and Other Trusts by the late James McKeen. {Second printing.) Ismo. Cloth binding. 162 pages. Syllabi. $1.50 net. EVERY-DAY ETHICS. The contents include: Journalism by Norman Hapgood; Accountancy by Joseph E. Sterrett; Lawyer and Client by John Brooks Leavitt; Transportation by Hon. Charles A. Prouty; and Speculation by Henry Crosby Emery. (Second printing.) ismo. Cloth binding. 150 pages. Index, $1.50 net. ' , ^ , INDUSTRY AND PROGRESS. By Norman Hapgood. l2mo. Cloth binding. 123 pages. Index. $1.50 net. POLITICIAN, PARTY AND PEOPLE. By Henry C. Emery. I2i,i0. Cloth binding. 183 pages. Index. $1.50 net. QUESTIONS OF PUBLIC POLICY. The contents include: The Character and Influence of Recent Immigration by J. W. Jenks ; The Essential and Unessential in Currency Legislation by A. Piatt Andrew; The Value of the Panama Canal to This Country by Emory R. ^Ijnson; Benefits and Evils of the Stock Exchange by W^illard V7 King.. l2mo. Cloth binding. 134 pages. Index. $1.50 net. TRADE-MORALS: THEIR RELATION TO THE SCIENCE OF SOCIETY. By Edward D. Page. (Second edition.) I2mo. Cloth binding. 276 pages. Index. $1.50 net. ETHICS IN SERVICE. By Vi^illiam Howard Taft. izmo. Cloth binding. lol pages. Index. $1.13 net. INDUSTRIAL LEADERSHIP. By H. L. Gantt. (Second printing.) 8 "'x^ Xk- 0-j '>v^..<^'K.,.tfJL ;t.A,. i_ <;^.X. L, v-tt.' CONTENTS CHAPTER Preface Preface to the Second Edition To THE Reader .... Definitions .... I. The Evolution of Society II. The Evolution of Nations III. The Evolution of Conduct IV. The Evolution of Morals . V. The Evolution of Humanistic Ideals VI. Moral Adjuncts — Institutions and Con science VII. The Evolution of the Will: Its Regu lation of the Impulses . -.VIIL-^SThe Economic Impulses — Business IX. Business Conditions of the Twentieth Century in the United States X. Immigration — Quick Trading XI. Moral Conditions of Success XII. Application and Conclusions Sources Index Tables: Statistical Correlation PAGE V ix XV xviii 1 17 33 50 72 91 115 136 160 188 213 242 275 283 177 221 'M ^ (I / TRADE- MORALS I THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY On the granite block which forms the corner stone of one of the largest manufactories in New Eng- land — the first mill successfully established in this country to spin and weave flax into linen cloths — there is carved in strong letters these words : " All was others, All will be others." In this rude phrasing is expressed a thought that has dominated and guided the intellectual develop- ment of the last half century. With the issue in 1859 of Darwin's Origin of Species, began the conception, The now grown to a conclusion, that everything within Doctrine of our ken, instead of being at rest or in fixed or stable Evolution equilibrium, is really in a continual state of motion or change; that what today is, is the issue of some- thing that was yesterday and Is the source of some- thing else that will be tomorrow — "All was others; All will be others." Darwin's great discovery answered the question: Are there causes In Nature for the differences which Its we observe between the many varieties of living Biological animals and plants? With additions and subtrac- application trdns^itTefrrams today the accepted doctrine account- TRADE MORALS Its extension to the Physical Sciences Evolution in Psychology ing for the development of all the different living species which exist upon the face of the Earth. Upon this doctrine is based the theory of the biological sciences, Botany, Zoology, Physiology, Geology and all their kindred branches of knowledge. More recently this doctrine of continual change and devel- opment has made its way into the physical sciences, Chemistry, Physics and Mineralogy, and we may now more than suspect that the metals themselves, once a type of stability and inertness, are like living beings subject to their own laws of orderly and sequential change. Modern study of the phenomena of radio-activity and electric conductivity has led to the conclusion that like plants they have a period of growth, and possibly of decay — measured indeed by eons instead of by years. Before long the philos- opher's stone may have become a reality. Firmly established as the interpretation of the observed sequence of facts with respect to the origin and growth of physiological structure and function, the theory of evolution is now extended to the explanation of the problems presented by the more newly observed assimilations between the mental processes of men and beasts. And so. Psychology is learning not only that the active instincts of man originate in the lower animals, but that intellectual ideas which have been classed as self-evident — axioms which Euclid or Plato used as the starting point of their logical arguments — are by no means intuitively inherent in the natural constitution of the THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 3 human mind. Rather do we now regard those fundamental notions in mathematical and logical sciences which we call axioms, aphorisms, maxims, precepts or proverbs, and with which people start their reasoning as postulates or self-evident truths, as growing out of the observation and inference of many generations over an immense period of time. It follows that two and two make four, that things equal to the same thing are equal to each other, that the whole is greater than its part, are proposi- tions universally accepted without argument, not because of any inherent incapacity of the mind to question them, but because centuries of observation have proven them to be statements of fact, whereby an unconscious and universal habit has been formed of regarding them as self-evident and necessary truths. If, then, the facts, of which we have taken a brief survey, advancing from the more elementary of inert matter to the more complex of the human body and brain, may all be generalized as nothing else than particular phases of the universal phenomena of change and growth, how is it when we come in con- tact with the yet more complex aspects of mankind Evolution in combination — the moral, economic and political in relations which they assume to each other in society? Sociology Are there the same problems of change and growth to be solved in the sphere of the mutual relations of man to man? And does the theory of evolution play the same part in the solution of these social TRADE MORALS problems as it does in the other less complex fields of inquiry? For it is plain that the relations of man to Conduct Its laws found by abstraction man in social life depgJo3l3IpBBC3te33on3ji2I5f each man toward the other, considered first as individuals, and then as bound together by some tie of associa- tion, as in a state, or as in a common employment, and that this conduct, being both intangible and diffuse, is a matter of much greater complexity than any of those previously considered. Intangible because unrecorded, except as to the infinitesimal fraction which is of contemporary interest; diffuse, because so widespread that it is beyond the power of any observer to perceive more than another small fraction of the whole. Conduct, "voluntary action adj usted to end s,"^ follows apparently the caprices of the human will, and at first blush would seem to be a subject incap- able of appraisal and classification by the scientific methods which have classified the more fixed and settled phenomena of nature, recognized their inter- relations and established the laws of their uniform sequence in action. Nevertheless, through the method of segregation or abstraction, that is to say, by considering a certain class of conduct by itself, men have made some progress in formulating the uniform correspondence and sequence of conduct, and have reached some definite scientific conceptions of common modes of human action shown In rea- soning, as in Logic or Mathematics; in the accu- 1 Herbert Spencer, Data of Ethics, p. 2. THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 5 mulation of wealth, as in Economics ; in talking, as in Linguistics ; and in the ways in which human beings live together, as in Sociology. Each of these sciences has succeeded in some degree in its quest for laws or universal ways by which men act when reasoning, when earning, when speaking or when associating in a society. Society, in the general sense in which I have here What is used it, is not the little fellowship of congenial people Society? in a neighborhood who take themselves seriously as the self-appointed guardianjs of etiquette or courte- sies, to appraise exactly the value of various styles of dress, or the strict obligations of mutual enter- tainment. On the contrary, what I refer to is the largest body of persons who feel that they are held together for the satisfactio n --of- contmon interestsr " - A..£Qnim€>n-poiiticarofganization is not of necessity the tie ; for three quarters of a century prior to the Civil War two distinct societies were united in the Federal Union, yet with such diverse interests as to eventually rend them asunder. Except by force, Ulster and Kerry can hardly be held together on their common island with their common speech and with their common king. Nor should we say that Austria and Hungary, though joined by a common rule, and contributors to a common war chest, are anything but two distinct societies. Common language is not the tie; quite different in social customs and aspirations are Canada and New Zealand. The bond that unites men into a society is TRADE MORALS Ethics the science of wrong con3uct Not all conduct is moral or immoral one of common thought and feeling, and centuries ~0"f""poTrEicar separation as with the Poles in Austria, Germany and Russia, or with the Greeks in Crete and the Archipelago, are powerless to destroy it. Ethics is the science by which we endeavor to dis- cover principles governing human conduct when appraised as either right or wrong. Its method is similar to that of its sister science of Political Economy, which has to do with the principles guiding human conduct toward gainful or wasteful ends. In the one, conduct having moral effect, purport or implication is segregated for the time being from all other conduct for study and classification; just as in the other, conduct having a bearing on the acquisi- tion of wealth is segregated for the same purpose. Not all conduct must of necessity be moral or immoral; often it has no moral. significance whatso- ever and is therefore simply tmmoral. We should "hot t^ink 6T"attaching moral consequences to ordi- nary eating or drinking, the wearing of a coat or the drawing of a check for money. And yet we must admit that under circumstances gluttony or excessive drinking of stimulants may be immoral because of its consequences to our families or business associates; we should quickly find ourselves in jail were we to venture on the street naked, and were we to draw a check on a bank in which we had no account we would subject ourselves to the charge of fraud, and to criminal prosecution. The essential difference between the acts to which we are in the habit of THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 7 attributing moral significance and those which have no implication of right and wrong lies in the fact that the former are good or bad for others than our- selves, that is to say, they affect either the feelings or welfare of our families, or of our neighbors, or maybe of the whole society in which the acts are performed and of which the actor is a part. If we could consider man as an isolated individual In isolation we can understand why it is necessarily impossible no morals for him under such circumstances to pursue an immoral course of conduct; for in his case there is no other person to be injured or benefited by his conduct. So long as Robinson Crusoe remained alone on the island of Juan Fernandez his acts con- cerned no one but himself and hence were neither wrong nor right. They might only be wise or foolish so far as they were correctly or imperfectly adjusted to his own survival in the environment by which he was surrounded. But from the moment that he found in the sand the footprints of the man Friday some part of his conduct was adjusted with reference to this other person and thus was in the way of being compared with some standard, to agree with which would be right, or to differ with would be wrong. Conduct may have a variety of qualities; it may be wise or imprudent, thrifty or wasteful, sensible or f oolishiJiealthx.orjnorbid ; and yet neither right nor wrong. Or it may be several of these and also right or wrong. Like a bargain or a quarrel, it takes two to make 8 TRADE MORALS Moral „ conduct a social matter Sociology Social traces in fossil life moral conduct . It therefore follows that the science which deals with right and wrong conduct is essen- tially one of the sciences of society. It assumes and is'-'Sepend^ent "upon that aggregation of men and women, leading a common existence, and depending to a greater or less degree upon each other for the amenities of life, which we are In the habit of calling a community, people or society. ^ Society being the fabric upon which is traced the embroidery of moral conduct. It will be necessary briefly to inquire Into its raw material and texture as shown by the researches of the biological and anthro- pological sciences. Looking backward by the aid of these departments of knowledge to the earliest known manifestations of the existence of man, we can find no conditions under which even the most primitive of mankind are devoid of some form of association. Paleontology even teaches us through fossils preserved in early geological strata that the roots of social life are to be found In the most primeval animal history. In the Paleozoic Age the compound nature of many poly- zoan fossils points clearly to the existence of societies In lower forms of life, whose individual members were dependent upon each other and upon the entire group or colony for food, propagation and protec- tion from the enemies that might otherwise have destroyed them. What little we know of the habits of living animals confirms the same general principle of a rudimentary THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 9 social or collective activity which permeates and Social traits pervades almost the entire range of animal existence, of the lower Many Polyzoa, like corals and sponges, cannot exist animals independently of others of their kind. Insects, like ants and bees, dwell together in orderly swarms. Fishes are found together in schools or shoals. Of the Birds consort in broods, coveys and flocks. Among higher the higher mammals, flocks, herds and droves of animals wild sheep, deer and cattle show a like social organi- zation ; a tendency which seems to weaken only in the case of a few carnivora and birds of prey, and even with these there is never less than a pair. What are the_ caiisps thatJUoderJie^-this. tendency to Causes of animaT" association. ? In the lower forms, scantily animal provided with motive capacity, it would seem to society arise from a need of greater self-grotection than an individual can furnish^^^a"C5^eration, so to^ speak, in building a barrier, such as a shell, against the assaults of more alert and food-seeking enemies ; and this structure by reason of its weight assists in '. the capture of sea-borne food which floats more rapidly in the current than do the heavy protective ^"'' tissues which the colony secretes. It is quite appar- ent that an Individual escaping from such a colony would have a comparatively slight chance or survival wherever foes were plentiful and food scarce. In the higher animals a flock or herd will better escape beasts of prey by the warning or even by the sacrifice of one of its outlying sentinels; and the group sur- vives where stragglers perish. A group, too, gives 10 TRADE MORALS Causes of human society Hunger Love Vanity Fear greater opportunities for s^xugj-conimerce and for the protection x)f the young, so that it can reproduce a larger number of its KinJ, in whom a habit of asso- ciation, become instinctive, will strengthen with each successive generation. Society, as Sumner points out in his Folkways, is the result of an effort to satisfy interests growing out of four motive forces common to all mankind, tersely stated as Hunger, Love, Vanity and Fear.^ These may be called the primTtrve motive?,"" because even across the vague boundaries which part humankind from animalkind we find them efficient causes of social formation, in which the brutes participate as well as our goodselves. Hunger, the need of sus- tenance; love, the need of reproduction; are biotic motives common in some form to all life, be it vegetal or animal. But only beings possessing a centralized ganglionic nervous organization are sus- ceptible to the motives of fear and vanity, important, as we shall see, to survival in the more complex environment of all higher types of organisms. No being without some form of mental devel- opment can experience them, and therefore they may be called psychic motives. For centuries they have been recognized in literature and language as per- 2 It is quite possible that this, as a classification of motives, is by no means exhaustive, for all of the instincts seem to be more or less involved in the production of folkways. On the other hand it is the essential part of a fundamentally true picture, and by its vividness will be the more easily recalled to the student's mind. I -■'<