3-R BCoS CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY From the Library of V. F. CALVERTON DATE DUE m^ ^^^F PP3=^=^^M- ffiqH: a^ Hfj^y !> 'Cl z PRINTED IN U, S t Cornell University Library BR520 .B65 I^^BSn 3 1924 029 253 908 THE f«-*i^^'»»*/V-j^ •NEWYORK- ■n<£.»TRUTH'SEEKERCo- "62 Ve«ey Street, New York US- \:.v. Copyrighted Bv THE Truth Seeker Company 1898. OAv?v\ov, ColU,e4 }^^n^ BLUE LAWS OF CONNECTICUT. The Blue Laws of Connecticut is a title given the legislation of that Commonwealth by the Rev. Samuel Peters, who parodied its laws in a volume published many years ago, and so cleverly was the parody worded that even now but few know whether the laws he quoted were or were not actual legislation by the lawmakers of Connecti- cut. They were not, but, while they were not, the bona fide laws were every whit as blue as those he alleged to have been in existence. One i o f the laws best known as a Connecticu t BlueEaw^// i s~ a pr ohi bition of ^mothersfro m kissing their || chil^r gn of Sunday, o r on that day erroneously ' called by the Puritans the Sabbath. While there never was such a statute in Connecticut, there were laws similarly tyrannical, for it is on record -, that men were fine d for kissing^ their wives pub - ^^ , .. li cly on t Hat Qay^ Alice Morse Earle, in her in- teresting volume, " The Sabbath in Puritan New England," writes of the Blue Laws: "Though these laws were worded by Dr. Peters, and though we are disgusted to hear them so often quoted as historical f ac-ts, still we must acknowledge that though in detail not correct they are in spirit true records of the old Puritan laws which were enacted to enforce the strict and decorous observance of the Sabbath, and which were valid not only in Connecticut and Massachusetts, 4 BLUE LAWS OT CONNECTICUT. but in other New England states. Even a careless glance at the historical record of any old town or church vrill give plenty of details to prove this." The laws we here quote justify this assertion, and the records of the courts prove it beyond question. These courts had wide latitude in pun- ishing offenses against religion and Puritan mor- ality, and written statutes were not necessary in order to fine, whip, and imprison those who deviated from the Puritan standard of conduct. The actual statutes of Connecticut were as blue as anything the Rev. Samuel Peters could imagine, and it is only that the people were unacquainted with these laws that they were aroused when Mr. Peters parodied them. There was then awakened in the minds of his readers undisguised contempt for the people who could enact them, and much indignation and condemnation has been wasted upon a set of laws which never existed, while most tryannical statutes which were real have gone unnoticed and their sponsors uncondemned. When the Rev. Mr. Peters wrote his volume he was in England, and he probably wrote from memory, with no copy of the Conneaticut Code by him. As a New England clergyman he knew what the practice was as to Sabbath observance, and the practice reflected the laws, or the laws the practice, as one pleases. And the practice was " blue" indeed, as were the punishments for Sab- bath breaking. Three of the most famous of the pretended statutes which Mr. Peters quoted were these: " No one shall travel, cook victuals, make beds, BLUE LAWS OF CONNECTICUT. 5 sweep house, cut hair, or shave on the Sabbath Day." " No woman shall kiss her child on the Sabbath or fasting day." " No one shall ride on the Sabbath day, or walk in his garden or elsewhere except reverently to and from meeting." Yet these rules had all the effect of legal enact- ments. As to the first, the Puritans from sunset on Saturday until Sunday night, would not shave, have rooms swept, nor beds made, nor food pre- pared, nor cooking utensils and table-ware washed. Men i n large num bers wer e fined for walking and, riding unnecessarily on Sunday, and for riding "violently to and from meeting." That is why Mr. Peters put the word "reverently" in his alleged statute. As late as 1831, a lady journey- in g to her father's house in Lebanon. Conn., wa g fined for unn ecessary traveling on the Sab bath. And Captain J<^emble of Boston, in 1656, was kept for two hours in the public stocks for his lewd and unseemly behavior in "publiquely" kissing his wife on Sunday. His wife met him upon the doorstep when he returned from a three years' voyage, and they scandalized the neighbors with the warmth of their greeting. In 1670 two lovers of New London, Conn., were accused and tried for "sitting together on the Lord's day under an apple tree in Goodman Chapman's orchard." The tithing-man could arrest any who walked or rode too fast a pace to and from meeting, and he could arrest any who "walked or rode un- necessarily on the sabbath." Great and small alike were under his control, as this notice from 6 BLUE LAWS OF CONNECTICUT. the " Columbian Centinel" of December, 1789, abundantly proves. It is entitled "The President and the Tithing-man:" "The President [George Washington], on his return to New York from his late tour through Connecticut, having missed his way on Saturday, was obliged to ride a few miles on Sunday morn- ing in order to gain the town at which he had pro- posed to have attended divine service. Before he arrived, however, he was met by a tithing-man, who, commanding him to stop, demanded the occa- sion of his riding; and it was not until the Presi- dent had informed him of every circumstance and promised to go no further than the town in- tended that the tithing-man would permit him to proceed on his journey." The following is a list of the Sabbath Day offenses taken cognizance of by the authorities, and the punishment meted out. It is compiled from "The Sabbath in Puritan New England," taken from church and court records. It was not necessary for the state legislature to make laws of the "blue " variety for these minor offenses. The town governments, which were one with church governments, looked after the people with care. In those days each person knew his neighbor's business thoroughly. The ministers ruled with