1 ' .1^, M ' . .,1,1, «' A ,A{.il fi iMi ilt ' ,1 ,Li««t, I I tiwV Hto" UMii ^ ». -I (J : (5orneU UnitierattH ffilibratg innrs.a.D.u>liite Cornell University Library PC 2271.S39 Uncle Sam and his nephews In French, or 3 1924 026 521 868 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924026521868 [PROF. C. C. SCHAEFFER'S NEW BOOK.] German, The Latin, System. FRENCH. English, French. UNCLE SAM AND HIS NEPHEWS, IN FRENCH, The FRENCH Verb AS TAUGHT WITH THE .^^Wanamafeer^ Strawbridgs &i Conarf ' SchsmG OP RETURNING STEM CHANGES AS A PASTIME TO LITTLE CHILDREN. BY % 6air^if)Sf0i|elr. (For the Children's Publishing Company, "Limited.") PHILADELPHIA: CHARLES, BROTHER & CO. 1885. COPTKIOHT, 1885, BT C. J. C. SOHAEFPER. COIUHS, Peihtee. PEEFACE. EvEBT " Dog" has his Day ; and this is Teachers' Day. The rest is "silence" as to character or kind of Contents. Let each one who uses the book find it out for himself and so judge of the fitness of the whole under the purposes of the book as the children have who made, or helped to make the book, and to whom in Love, with a number of Copies for each, it is inscribed. The Author. Philadeephia, July, 1885. (iii) MAIN CONTENTS. FIVE SESSIONS. FIEST SESSION". The subject. Incidents. Tenses and Modes. One Tense introduced. SECOND SESSION. ' The Work of the Children with the Chart. THIRD SESSION. Study on Endings. Classes of Verbs. The Eide through the Sky. FOUETH SESSION". Study on Stem-Changes. Eegular and Irregular Verbs. Straight and Jumping Changes. The Fight. FIFTH SESSION. The Tenses of all Verbs, Simple and Compound, in full. The Verb com- pleted. The Children's Rewards. New Text, abridged. CHAETS. Main Chart. The Badges. Teacher's Blackboard Copy of Cut from Chart of Irregular Verbs, containing the Eight Irregular of the Fourteen "Working Verbs, of the Children. Pen and Ink Sketch of Enlarged Copy of Small Main Chart . . . Fol. Charts i-iv The Children's Copy Book. Special Chart of the Forms of the Aux- iliaries in the " Wanamaker" Square . . Fol. Charts v-xii Children's Copy of Chart of the Irregular Verbs in full Fol. Charts xiii-xxiv ADVERTISEMENTS. given here as part of the Contents of the Book. Lecture — English; Outs — Greek, Latin; Specimen Pages — German, "High School Manual ;" Publications — " The American System ;" Diagram — Explaining System ; Papers — Old, Philadelphia ; Expenses — Public Ledger of System, (iv) FIRST SESSIOJN'. The Subject, Incidents, Tenses, and Modes. One Tense, Introduced. Teacher. Willie, do you know how to read ? Willie. Yes, sir. Te. Do you know how to write ? W. Yes, sir. Te. Do you want to learn the French verb? W. From the Large Chart, down stairs ? Te. Yes, Willie. W. Yes, sir. Te. Anita, Minnie, Nellie, Anna, Stephen, Beulah Dee, do you know how to read and write ? Children. Yes, sir. Te. Would you like to learn the French verb ? Anita. I do not know. Te. Why? Anita. It is so hard. Te. Who says so ? Anita. My sisters. Te. It used to be so, but thanks to " Wanamaker," it is now made easy. Willie. Wanamaker ? Te. " Wanamaker" & " Co." Willie. Who is the " Co." ? Te. I do not know who the " Co." is ordinarily, except Philadelphia ; yet you will presently see who they are. Anita. Oh ! if it is not too hard, I should like to learn it. Te. It is as. easy now, girl, as rope jumping. Willie. And perhaps less tiresome. Te. Not tiresome at all ; we let the verbs jump and keep quiet ourselves. Anita. Well, then, I should like to learn it. Children. And we, too, all. Te. Get your copy-books. First page, write : ''French, The Verb." What are verbs ? Children. Words which say what we do. Te. Then write : Verbs, words of action. Tenses, what are tenses ? Ch. Tenses are words that say something when an action is done. Te. Write : Tenses are forms of verbs which denote the time of an action. Times : how many kinds of times have we ? (5) ? _6 — Willie. Well, there is past time and future time. Te. Is there not also present time ? Willie. Yes, there is present time, too. Te. In what direc- tion, Willie, lies from you, for you, and so from us, for all of us. Future Time? Willie. Forward. Te. Show me by a motion of the hand, this direction Willie (pointing forward). Te. In what direction from you lies Past Time : Willie. Back, behind. Te. Show me, children, by a movement of the hand, this direction from you, of past time. Children (showing it). Te. Now, here, direction is indicated by movement of the hand, but direction as past or future time, may be indicated not alone by the movement of the hand; it may be indicated by a movement of the voice or accent, and if made so, for the past, and left as a sign or letter, we call it, in Greek, Augment. Wil. Aug- ment, what is that ? Te. A little short syllable of sound, having the accent on it put before the verb when it goes in its meaning from the present into the past ; augment meaning, increase. Wil. That is a very nice way to denote past time. Te. First this movement was made with the voice, then afterwards, when the language was written, it showed as a syllable with the accent on it. And if the verb goes to the Future, a very near future, a future sure and in earnest, then the accent vwshtu forward. Anita. Swinging like a pendulum. Te. Like a pendulum of mind, swinging time, and by the kind of swinging, showing time, in Greek, in speech. A man may say : I shall strike you, meaning at some future time ; then he points with his finger, and in the verb by a letter ; but if he means, I strike you right away, then he points not with his finger, or in the verb with a letter, but in life he doubles up his fist, holding it up to the face of the man he means at some time, but that " some- times" not very far off, to strike, and his voice in the verb, in its energy of accent, and " doubling up" — contracting the word — rushes forward — they call it the Second Future. Wil. Have we anything like it in English ? Te. Of course, we have — we have in English all what the others all, taken to- gether, have — of keys, as meaning of letters, management of words, in sentences, or singly as sounds, accent, or spelling — only abridged, because we have so much — and are always in a hurry— and so here we have the idea of time in a word, but not as an increase, in this case, only as a motion of accent on the word, either backward, or forward. When you get something presented, and the presentation is over, then you call what you got, what ? Gh. A present. Te. But when the party has yet to do it, has to make the presentation or is making it, then you call what he does ? Gh. Present. Te. When a conviction has taken place, then you call the man convicted a con- vict, but when the act is yet doing or to be done, then you call what the jury does or is to do, what ? Gh. To convict. Te. When a place has been left empty, by man and beast, nothing but sand and hot sun, you call it, what? Gh. A desert. Te. But when a man runs away from his family, his wife and children, a thing that happens now by far too often, then you say he does, what? Gh. Deserts. Te. So you see, in each case, the effect or what has taken place, is noted by a motion of the accent backward, and the im- pulse, that is the place of accent showing what is doing or yet to be done — 7 — lies where ? Ch. Forward. Te. Backward and forward on the word, as past, or future, lies backward or forward from you. But if you take not yourself, your own line of action and move the accent backward and forward, according as the motion corresponds to your meaning of past and future, but if you take the line of a word like an arrow, and move the accent backward and forward on it to indicate your meaning, as impulse or effect on this arrow of the word, on what side of that arrow or word lies then the effect, on this side of the word or arrow, the place of the notch, its side towards you, the beginning of the word, or at its other end, the point away from you, forward, the point where the arrow strikes ? Ch. At the other end, forward. Te. And the point of impulse, that is, the point that speeds the arrow or word, the notch, or the start of the word, on what side of the arrow or word lies then that point, backward or forward ? Ch. Backward. Te. Backward, as arrow or word, though still forward, when you hold the arrow or let the word fly, from you. So then you see, on your own line of action, the past or the effect, lies backward, this way (teacher showing), and the impulse, future, lies for- ward (teacher showing), but on the line of an action as word or an arrow, representing a word, the point of effect lies, where? Ch. Forward. Te. And the point of impulse, that is, your point which drives the arrow or word, lies, where ? Ch. Backward ! Te. So when you say, fare-well, and mean "well," to the party you leave or this " well" as effect, then you say, how? Ch. Farewell! Te. O queen, farewell, be still possessed Of dear remembrance, blessing still and blest. But if you were leaving in anger, or describing simply yourself as in leave- taking, with no thought on the well, only a thought on the " leave" — though I wish the first may never happen to you, children, in your young life — Willie. Does it sometimes happen to you. Professor? Professor. It does, it did, yes, it does, sometimes, with people that won't listen to facts, to help their digestion — how do you then or would you then say, farewell, or fare- well ? Children. Farewell ! Te. But farewell, king ; since thus thou wilt appear, Freedom lives hence, and banishment is here ; or, in "Milton :" If chance the radiant sun with farewell sweet Extend his ev'ning beam, the fields revive. The birds their notes renew, and bleating herds Attest their joy, that hill and valley ring. Or, Shakespeare, again : See how the morning opes her golden gates. And takes her farewell of the glorious sun ! Willie, rising in his seat : Then, farewell, king, since thus thou wilt appear. Freedom lives hence, and banishment is here ! Anita. 0, I like the other better: Farewell, queen— how does it go. 7e. O queen, farewell ; be still possest Of dear remembrance, blessing still and blest. Now, children, if I should leave you, such as you and we all are here working, and being together, how would you likely say ? Oh- Farewell, Professor. Te. And I, how would I surely say? Gh. Farewell, children! Te. So I would, and add, heartily : be still possessed of dear remembrance, blessing still and blessed ! Minnie. What queen was it. Professor ? Te. Not our May Queen, Minnie, of the late Commencement. But, whether this queen or any other, or no queen, this farewell would always be used when parting, with grief at the parting with what is or was, sometimes dear. The former, first, only indifferently, or with the purpose of delight, as leave. Now hear another, from our great master, in these things, of language, Shakespeare, the two in two lines that follow each other close together ; so you can compare, what he discriminated and separated already for you in King Henry the Eighth : So, farewell to the little good you bear me. (" Little good" are words quoted from the words just spoken by an enemy ; and then, the next line :) Farewell ! a long farewell to all my greatness ! And Shakespeare was perhaps drunk when he wrote this with needs of metre, these needs pushing him this way and that way — as the commentators seem to be with rules, which being rules of their own, are not rules of the language. Minnie. Who was Shakespeare ? Te. A thunderbolt, an earth- quake of a poet ; a clown for the clownish, but a mouthpiece, as art, of the Lord, to please and, if it need be, to shake a world. Beware of its shocks ! But if, before parting, I gave you a lesson, simply expressing by its number or kind as lesson, a " parting," what would you call such a lesson then ? Gh. A farewell lesson. Te. Now to our present. The Future, as we have seen on our line^ lies forward, the past back ; now, then, children, what lies as time with us? Gh. The present. Te. And how would we denote that? would we not, by a gentle motion of the hand downward, towards the place where we stand so as to say : Here we are and here is the action ; what line would then denote the present ? Gh. A line downward. Te. Now, to your copy-books ; write : " Times," and beneath it mark by arrows, the directions, as past, future, present. Ghildren (writing). " Times." Past. Future. < , ^> Pre sent. V Te. (examining books). Why have you made, all, the arrow of the past, going to the left, and that of the future, to the right? Gh. We don't know. — 9 — Te. Because life go&s from the left, to the right, from the heart, on the left side of the body, to the right ; the hand that follows executes the commands of the heart. Minnie. Then you would not like us to write with the left hand ? Te. No, children, I would not like you to write or do any heavy work with the left hand, so long as you have the use of the right. Now, write your tenses, first : Future. English : I shall - - (eat, drink, sleep). French, as ending : — rai. Ghildren (writing). Te. This — rai as ending, is simply put on the stem or the trunk of the verb, that is, that part, which remains, in the main, un- changed, no matter how many branches or twigs, of endings and end letters are either put on the first time or exchanged for others, according as the meaning of the verb changes as to tense, person, number, mood ; what is mood ? Stephen (after some time). The way I feel. Te. And that as a form of expression is exactly the mood or Mode, in the verb, the way you feel in using the verb as a statement of a fact, or wish, or command, or speaking its name, or lastly, conceiving it as a quality that is, this latter, in general, a form of expression stating by a special kind of word, how or what a per- son or thing is, and in the case of a verb, how a person or thing is or ap- pears by either doing the action expressed by the verb, or by being done and rendered by such an action, for instance, singing, speaking, torn, broken, as, Willie is speaking, the birds are singing, the houses, and this is now the fashion, are tumbling, or, the vessel is broken, the books are torn, these latter then being understood as passive in that form, the others active. This form of speaking a quality through the form of a verb, we call Participle, and the one, the active, expressing the doing, is the Present Par- ticiple, the other, the passive, the being done, the Past Participle. The kind of words themselves, expressing quality, we call Adjectives, and the verb in this form of the Participle, is then a kind of Adjective ; and so, in French, by ending treated as if it was one. The name of the Verb is the Infinitive, that form which reads, to eat, to drink, to strike, to sing, to sleep, to fall, or, when passive, to be eaten, to be struck. It does not say, who does or suffers what is mentioned, it simply states the fact, the name, the kind of action. And the difference between the active and the passive, called as such, voice, may go through all the tenses and moods, as : I strike, am being struck, I shall strike, I shall be struck — this as Indicative, meaning : sure, or : I may strike, or may be struck, this, making it supposed or doubtful, or expression may be merely given to the power to strike, this, then, called Potential; and this, when a condition is mentioned, may also be called Conditional, and which, when a verb is merely subjoined in its use, a servant, to another, may be called Subjunctive. In: I did not expect that I would see him here, the "expect" is the master, and the " would see him," the servant, a kind of dependence which shows in English more strongly when you use " if." : If it rain, I shall not come. _10_ 'J"he root of a verb or word is, properly speaking, that original part or form which is hidden in the depth of language, hardly seen by us, as the root is of a tree in the ground, and from, which the tree takes its life, as trunk or stem, in its branches and foliage. And so the word as we use it sprang in the same way, from a root, which learned men hunt up ; though often in Grammars, root is used instead of stem. In lovedst, lovest, to love, loving, the " lov" is the stem, because it is in all the words. In Verbs, not alone in French, but in verbs in general, you find the stem by cutting off the end- ing of the Present Infinitive, for instance, in AIM-er, to love, -er is the end- ing of the Present Infinitive, and cutting this off, leaves here AIM- as the stem ; and to the stem of verbs, so found, as a rule, you attach the different endings, except you see, on our charts, given with the verb, direction to change the stem for a given tense, mood, and person. These changes of a verb, all, you find on our charts, with directions by position, that is mode of writing the change, above or below the verb, or signs and colors, as to the particular tense, mode, or person to which the change applies. In the case of the Future, you find the change, if a change occurs, always immediately above the Verb ; and if the old stem is to be used with the change, then you find only the letter or letters of change noted and a dash before it, this dash meaning the old stem to be used with the change ; if the old stem is to be left out and only the change be used, then you find no dash before the change. Example, if you see -e- AIM-er, first, to what tense is this change of an addition of the letter -e- by its posi- tion from what I said, understood to apply ? Ch. To the Future Tense. Te. And what is the full new stem ? Gh. AIM-e-. Te. And what is the full form then, of AIM-er, in the Future? Oh. AIM-e-rai. Te. But if you see : au- AV- what is now the new stem for the Future ? Oh. au-. Te. Now give me the Future in both these verbs; the notation immediately above the verb, means " Future stem" — and the ending we have had already. Ch. (spelling.) AIM-e-rai, au- rai. Te. What these verbs mean, we shall presently see. Now repeat what you wrote, with addition of the line : Future stem change — if occurring immediately above the Verb. Gh. (writing.) Future Tense. English: I shall - - (eat, drink, sleep). French, as ending : -rai. (Future stem change, if a change of stem occurs for the Future, immedi- ately above the verb.) Te. Now, children, the charts that we use, are the large chart, down stairs — 11 — which contains all about the Verb and a few verbs — and this chart here, called the Chart of the Irregular Verbs, containing all the verbs of that kind. There is also a cut from the Chart of the Irregular Verbs, the last eight, given in the order of the a b c as they stand on the chart, which we shall work in full — and knowing how to work them, we will know how to work all the rest, the cut being handier for your work than the chart itself. I also shall make you for next time a blackboard drawing in colored chalk, of these last eight verbs, so that you can see them any way, looking down or up as it may best suit you. The English is given with them and they are, some of them, the very worst, that is, most irregular, of the French Language. The English of the verbs of the Large Chart, however, I must give you, as it is not on that Cliart. It is, in the order of these Verbs : to love, to finish, to owe, to sell, to have, to be. These last two, we call the Auxiliary, that is, helping, Verbs, because they help in French, as the same verbs do in English, to make forms of other verbs. Now let us go down, the next time and make the inner cut with the French verb. Gh. What does this mean. Professor ? Te. It means : driving the horse around the circle whilst holding it quietly by the bridle from the centre. "Would you rather make the outer circle and run with the horse? they do this in schools. Anita. But you cannot whip the horse. Te. My horses, that is, verbs, need no whipping, they are too glad to be on their own natural legs, not those of the schoolmaster — they need no whipping. They are free, chil- dren, and like as free, to run, for their own sakes and the children's. SECOJNTD SESSION The Work of the Children with the Chart. Te. Now, children, write the Future Tense of the six Verbs on the large chart, two more of the Irregular Verbs, and then six more, of the last verbs of the chart of the Irregular Verbs, commencing, with these, to write the list from the bottom, working upwards. Willie. I guess, Pi-ofessor, you do so in our case, or, with us — . Professor. Exactly, Willie ; everybody can teach, that is, make a pretension to teach, big boys and girls ; but with little ones, there is no show of teaching possible. They want substance. Now, write first the name in English of these 14 verbs, in a first column, then the Future of these 14 verbs in English : I shall love, I shall finish, etc., in a second column, then the ending -rai once for all the verbs, in t\iQ fourth aoXnian, on the right side, and then, the stem, as it is in the Infinitive, or as you may see it changed on your charts, in a third column, or the column before the ending, thus (showing on blackboard) : to love 1 I shall love | aim-e- ] rai. Then we will read what you wrote. Willie. We don't know how to read French. Te. I help you ; first write. Ch. (writing.) Te. The I of the I shall, you put in parenthesis because we have not yet the word which cor- _12 — aim-e- fin-i- dev- vend- au- se- voud- ver- viv- vet-i- viend- vaud- vainc- trai- responds to it in French. Gh. (writing, from charts, Large Chart, and "cut.") • Copy of children's writing as seen when finished : Future Tense. to love (I) shall love to finish (I) shall finish to owe (I) shall owe to sell (I) shall sell to have (I) shiall have to be (I) shall be to be willing (I) shall be willing to see (I) shall see Six more words, Irregular Verbs. to live (I) shall live to clothe (I) shall clothe to come (I) shall come to be worth (I) shall be worth to conquer (I) shall conquer to milk (I) shall milk Te. Now show me on our Large Chart where there is that Future ending -rai. Wil. Here, I see it on top — F. that means Future : rai. Can I scrib- ble the Future -rai from this, on the inside of the cover of my copybook ? there may be more of it. Te. You can, Willie, but they all come from this chart, and you have it here, with your AIM-e-rai. Wil. But I think I have them better also put separate, as theyare on this our Large Chart. Te. These endings form also a part of our large printed chart of the Irregular Verbs. You can, you see, have them from anywhere : you have them now here, on our Large Chart, you scribble them now in your copybook and have them on your printed chart of Irregular Verbs. As you use these endings always in all verbs, you cannot see them too often. The sign over the French of to clothe, children, is an accent, circumflex, making the sound of the letter over which it stands, long and broad. It is in fact a tombstone placed over a buried letter. Willie. What letter. Pro- fessor ? I'e. The s, here ; you see this from your English which, as the same word, or rather a word derived from the same Latin word, has the s — vest, vestment. I will now read you these verbs you wrote in French, and you repeat (teacher reading, children repeating). Now next step : One Verb, Future Tense, complete in Person and Numbers, I, thou, he, etc. Write the Future in English, of the verb : to love, I shall love, thou wilt love, etc., in the Singular and the Plural, putting these down with 1, 2, 3 for the Persons, as a first column ; then, opposite, to the right, in a third column, put down the endings, in French, now as I give them, afterwards you find these things yourself, from the Chart, and before the endings, in the second column put the stem of that one verb, to love, in French. Inclose again your : I, thou, he, etc., in parenthesis. Gh. (writing): — 13 — One Verb Future Tense complete in Person and Numbers. Singular 1. (I) shall love aim-e- rai 2. (thou) wilt love " ra'-s 3. (he, she, it) will love " ra Plural 1. (we) shall love " ron-s 2. (you) will love " re-z 3. (they) will love " ron-t Te. The letters'you see on the right side with the endings, separated from them, are silent end letters which you see, but you do not hear them in pro- nunciation. I call these silent end letters, " spelling-letters, " or simply the " spelling" of those endings and the list of such " spelling" for all verbs and tenses is nearly the same as the above. Where on a chart you see no dash after an ending, there is no silent end letter for this ending in all verbs. The silent end letters in full, as they commonly occur, I will give you, from this chart. They are, in the order of Persons and Numbers, as follows : Singu- lar, s, s, t ; Plur., s, z, ent. The Future then, as you see, offers an excep- tion from a form of silent end letters or " spelling," it having in the 3 Plur. only a t instead of ent. And this in the Future of all verbs. "Who can show me these spelling letters, Sing., s, s, t, etc., on our Large Chart? Steph. I see them, here under the gold line, " Sp" spelling, S, that means Singular, s, s, t. Te. But where is the Plural ? Steph. Here in the corner, "PL," that means Plural, s, z — What is that D, s, with it ? Te. That means a certain tense, called D^fini, a tense similar in meaning to the Past Tense, Imperfect — has in the 2d Plural s. Then, finish your Plur. Steph. Plural, s, z, (D^fini s), ent. Gh. Can we find that also on the printed chart of the Irregular Verbs? Te. Of course you can, under the head " Spelling," a left and right column. Wil. Can I scribble them, too, in my copybook ? Te. Of course, Willie, anything of that kind ; what you scribble or write your- self will better stick in mind. So, go ahead. But write small ; you will have your page full when you want to copy our Large 'Chart, before you are aware of it. Now I will read, first these Endings, of the Future, then the whole of the forms, each in French, and you repeat, each time, after me, looking at the words. Te. (reading, children repeating.) Now we must have the Pronouns, I, thou, he, etc., for these forms, in French. Next step: Pronouns. The Pronouns of these Verbs, and all Verbs, and Tenses, in Singular and Plural, in French. Write first your Pronouns in English, then opposite the French as I give it. Ohil. (writing.) The French has no neuter. The Pronouns of the Verbs, in French. Singular 1. 2. 3. Plur. ]. I thou he, she, it we je tu il, elle (no neuter) nous 2. 3. you they vous ils, elles (feminine) — 14 — Te. Now read the French, after me (reading, children repeating). When the je comes before a vowel, the e is dropped, and an apostrophe | used in its stead. The j' is then read with the word that has that vowel. Now give us your Future of "to love," in French, in full, with Pronouns and Endings. Make it yourself, commencing with Sing.l, I shall love, and divide between Pronouns, and Stem, and Ending, and in case of the " Spelling," as before, use a dash, heading your writing thus : One Tense, the Future Tense, in one Verb, with Pronouns in French, and Endings in full. Children (writing, and heading, as above). Sing. 1. I shall love 2. thou wilt love 3. he, she, it will love Plur. 1. we shall love 2. you will love 8. they will love Te. Now I will read the whole in French, you repeat. (Teacher reading, children repeating). Now, children, we have to prepare to get ready for a balloon ; the field extends and we see better when we look downward or see it from above. Write first your Future in AIM-er, as you had it the last time in all per- sons, with the Pronouns in French and English in full, but with the Present Infinitive or the name of the verb, in French and English added. You find the Infinitives or the name of the verb, on the Charts. As the columns are numerous, here is the scale for your columns. You write these. Infinitive, Future, Pronouns, etc., first in AIM-er, then in all the Verbs. What ap- plies to all Verbs, as the Pronouns, and the Endings, here as of the Future, you write but once for all the Verbs. I will show you how to make these, when you have written them, for that one verb, AIM-er, apply to all. Now, then, first the Future, with Pronouns and Endings, and Infinitives in full, in one Verb, AIM-er, butTnake the heading in full for all the Verbs : j' aim-e- rai tu ra-s il, elle ra nous ron-s vous re-z ils, elles ron-t — 10- One Tense, the Future Tense, in all the Verhs, with Pronouns, in French and English, in full; and the name of the Verb, as Present Infinitive, in French and English, added. This is quite a story. Now go at it, follow the scale. Children (writing). Te. Divide the English and French by a double line, and the Infinitives from the rest by a strong line. Over the " 1 shall" write : " for every Future in English ;" over the je, " for all Verbs ;" and over the endings in French, write : " for every Future in French." Children (writing) : For every Fu- ture in English. For all verbs. For every , Future in French. to love aim-er I shall, thou wilt,he,she, it will, we shall, you will,- they will love il, elle, DOUS, vous, ils, elles aim-e- rai, ra-s ra, ron-s re-z, ron-t Te. Now make a brace under the contents of the filled up columns and dots of repetition under it ; this will make the contents apply to all verbs. In the Verbs from the Charts, you have to watch now both, the Infinitive and the Future Stem. Children ( writing). ^ Y Y »- V to finish fin-ir (( finish fin-i- to owe dev-oir tt owe dev- to sell vend-re (( sell vend- to have av-oir It have au- to be li^re tt be se- to be willing voul-oir it be willing voud- to see v-oir (( see ver- to live viv-re " live viv- to clothe v6t-ir £( clothe vgti- to come ven-ir tt come viend- to be worth val-oir ti be worth vaud- to conquer vainc-re tt conquer vainc- to milk trai-re tt milk trai- Te. (examining books.) Stephen, you have forgotten circumflex in et-re. Willie, you forgot the i in the stem-change of vet-ir, vet-i- (rai). Anna, you forgot dash aftei^ stem-change in aim-e- (rai) ; the leaving away of the dash would make it in the column appear as a toII form, we want to provide for the addition of the -rai or any other of those endings of the Future. Now, children, read to me the Future of one verb of your list, the AIM-er with the Infinitives, and the Future in the persons and numbers, with the Pro- nouns in French and English, and the Endings ; repeating the " love" and " aim-e-" each time with a person. You can read the Future, first, all in English alone, and then so the French, or you can read one person at the time with the Pronouns in both English and French. We better, perhaps, try both ways, first the Future all alone in English, and then the French ; — 16 — and after that, reading one person at a time in English and French ; giving the Infinitive, of course, but once. Children (reading, both these ways). Te. Now we will take up reading, the same way, the other verbs. Mm. Oh, Professor, that would take all afternoon ; and I have to go to Wanamaker's. Te. We have to go to " Wanamaker's" too, not to-day, Minnie, but day after next. But we do not need read them all, we read only some of them. Willie, read voul-oir, to be willing, Future in French, all persons. Willie (reading). Te. Anna, read val-oir, in French, Future, all persons. Anna (reading). Te. Stephen, read etre, to be, same way. St. (reading.) Te. Anita, Nellie, Minnie, take vainc-re, to conquer. Oh. (reading.) Te. Now, for next time, learn them all by heart. Oh. Oh, Professor! Te. I am sure you know them now already, from your practice ; perhaps you might stumble on the Infinitives in French. Willie, give me vet-ir in French, by heart, I shall clothe, all through, leave the Pronouns away, the first time. Will. Vet-i-rai, vet-i-ra-s-. Te. How do you spell vetiras ? Willie (saying it and completing Tense). Te. Now add Pronouns : Je vetirai-. Willie (saying ; other children promiscuously taking other verbs, in the same way, first with- out Pronouns, then with them). Te. What is the sound of ai, ou, on, au in French, children? Children (practising sounds). Te. Oi is like wha in what. What does v, ou, 1, oi, r sound ? what v, oi, r? what v, ou, d, r, ai ? Oh. (answering, practising.) Te. Don't forget when you learn the page, to learn what each Verb means in English. Know it, or the most of it already? Nellie, what is serai ? Nellie. I shall be ? Te. Anna, what is finirai ? Anna. 1 shall finish. Te. Stephen, what is vetirai ? Stephen. I shall clothe. Te. Who knows what is vivrez ? Children. To live ? Te. I did not say vivr', I said vivrez? Oh. You will live. Te. Yes, you will live, children! that is true. Now, you are six, take, each one, for to-morrow as a specialty, one person of each verb. Nellie, 1st Sing. ; Anna, 2d ; Minnie, 3d ; Willie, Ist PI. ; Anita, 2d Plur. ; Steph., 3d Plur. ; but you are at the same time all, each, ready for the rest. And keep your eye on your copybooks, that page of to-day with the Endings of the Infinitive. It is now almost as large as France, that is, the principles which it shows are first mainly those of France. To-morrow we meet in the Balloon. Min. Will it not run off with us ? Te. Did I not say I would be at " Wanamaker's" day after next ? How could I be there if we were run ojff ? Besides, we are bound for the fracas of — the schools. Oh. What schools ? Te. All schools that don't believe in " Wan- amaker" or " Wanamaker" i&"Co." Min. Will it hurt the children? Te. Only bricks — blowing up prisons, Minnie — it will give the children room to live in schools, and to breathe. Min. Do we take our Large Chart with us? Te. No, Minnie, only our copybooks. Their contents are nearly as large already as all France, and soon I expect will be seen to extend to the size of both Europe and America. THIRD SESSION. STUDY ON ENDINGS. Classes of Verbs. — The Eide Theotjgh the Sky. In the Balloon. Te. Now, cMldren, to over page. You saw tlie endings of the In- finitive. You saw, all Infinitives liad certain endings, tliat is, an addition, each, to the stem of the verb, which constituted with the stem the name of the verb as in English the use of the " to,'.' with, for instance, the " love," constitutes the name of that verb as " to love.^ Now compare these endings, with each other. Give me some : Willie. Some verbs have — I see, one, has -er. Anita. One or several have -ir. Te. Let each child in turn, take one verb, in the order of the chart or charts, and see what ending it has ; Stephen^ iSteph. Aim -er, has -er. Beulah Dee. Fin -ir, has -ir. Anita. Dev -oir has -oir. Min. Vend -re has -re. le. Anna, next ; answer fi:om Large Chart. Anna. Av- has — ' Te. "What ? Don't you see the " 3," so it goes here like 3, dev -oir. Anna. Av-oir has^again, -oir. ' Te. Nellie, next ; look at the chart. Nellie. Et -4, §t- re has again -re, it goes like 4, vend- re. Te. Look at all the other verbs in your book, and see whether you find any ending in the Infinitive but what we had. Gh . There are none. Te, All have either — Gh. -er, -ir, -oir, or -re. Te. This difference in the endings of verbs in the Present Infini- tive, chiefly fixes their class. We divide the verbs in four classes, according to the four different kinds of endings in the Present 18 tion, those that have -ir, the second ; those that have -oir, the third; those that have -re, the fourth. All verbs must in the Infinitive Present, have one of these endings, -er, -ir, -oir, and -re. How many classes ? Ch. Four. Te. There are some other features of verbs, of a class, m which, one class may differ from another, but they don't run through the classes as features of difference, and cannot mark the classes,^ as streets that don't run through cannot count, in a city, in numberin_g the squares. They are skipped, and so we have to skip these features here, when marking classes, because they do not run through. This difference of the Infinitive, however, is a broad avenue that runs as such through all the verbs. All classes differ in the Infinitive. And there are four, and again, what are the endings ? Gh. First Class, -er. Second Class, -ir. Third Class, -oir. Fourth Class, -re. Wil. But why have they these four classes in French ; why have they not only one ? Te. (Eising and drawing knife), The answer to this is not on earth, so we have to get it from elsewhere ! Willie, you are almost too small, to ask that question, but you are not too small in this, for me, nor is the question too big not to answer it, when asked. It betokens a good scholar in the future, to ask this question. (Cutting the rope that had held the balloon floating.) Ch. (Frightened), Ah, Professor, where are we going to ! Te. To, towards the stars, the foundations of earth in the heavens, the eternal principles that founded the earth, and language and lan- guages. The French, first, have the four classes not, that I shall say, because, but I will say they have the division in number, as the Romans had them. I will explain here, in Latin. Min. How that car rocks and shakes. WiU it ever bring us back? Te. Never mind, it shoots at the rate of a thousand miles a min- ute and second, and, as of mind, is under perfect control. , Do you see that glimmer, of Rome ? That is where we float over. Gh. Eome, in Italy ? Te. Yes, children, we travel rapidly. Now hear ! The world is made of us and things or persons around us, and a verb may put its fiu' ger either on the things or persons where the action goes to or to us or things or persons where the action comes from, to explain its mean. 19 ing. I -will sliow by the word " teaching." Does it not take mind, and planning and thouglit, to teach, in the Educator ? Ch. Of course, it does ; a good deal. Te. But, is that enough ? Has he not to stand before the boys or girls to talk to them ? Min. Of course, he has. Te. But is that enough ? Has he not to set the boys and girls to work bringing his teaching that is, talking, in contact -with them, making it their own work ? Ch. Of course he has, otherwise there is no work. Te. And when he. has been teaching, in these different kinds of ways, first as his teaching, that is, the thinking over teaching by himself, the talking to them, then setting them to work, have not the boys or girls to show an effect of such teaching as a new state of their own, conveyed to them by the former state and actions of the teacher himself, as educator, teacher proper, instructor ? Anna. Of course, they have ; otherwise it could not properly be said that they were taught. Te. Now, if a verb puts its finger on the effect, here of teaching, as the new state of the boys or girls taught and so rendered erudite whilst before they were crude, to explain its meaning as teaching, such a verb, here a verb expressing teaching as effect, would be ^ verb of the fourth class, of effect left. "Would it not? Nellie. Clearly. Te. But if the verb puts its finger on the third class of work with the boys, the contact in instruction such a verb, as teaching, would be of the third class. Would it not ? Ch. Clearly. Te. And a verb putting its finger on the talking, of the teacher to the children, to explain its meaning as teaching, such a verb would be of the second class. Would it not ? Ch. It would. Te. And a verb that puts its finger on the educator to explain its meaning as teaching, as acts of thought, and planning of teaching, and application by the teacher, of methods to his own thought tp choose fi-om and so to select when his teaching comes to the other stages, of talking to the boys or girls, and setting them to work, and leave effects, such a word or verb would be a verb of the first class, explaining this part of the whole process or idea of teaching, as its meaning, not as a motion towards the boys and girls, or con- tact with them in work, or effect left, but impulse as we call it, though the act itself may and must be intended for the benefit of the boys ; but the finger of the verb is only on that part of the 20 whole work or idea of teaching as represeijted by the educator. And the first two phases or parts of the idea of teaching in general, you see on the side of the teacher, the last two on the side of the boys, phases meaning changes gradually to bring a thing from its state of thing as a part to its state of thing as a whole, like the phases, that is, stations in these changes of the moon. I wiU choose another e^mple. You can raise the hand lor yourself to give a sign; you can move, now, the hand, as before you moved the mind, to or towards a person or thing ; you can come on purpose in contact with persons or things as contact or stroke in- tended; and you can leave effects as a new state on man, things or beasts, as of being struck, stunned, fortified, fenced in ; and, even, you can feel such an effect yourself when hearing in which you are entirely passive, and express this passive state of yourself by a verb, the verb to hear. Now such verbs intending to express their mean- ings as these successive stages of some general idea of action, would then again be verbs of the four different classes, that is, verbs of im- pulse, motion, contact, or effect left; here in the form of "to strike " or as movements of the hand, as before we had them as movements of mind in " teaching;" and the first two kinds of actions we see again on the side of the actor, the last two, on the side of the thing or person acted upon, or to use now terms, the first two, as phases or features of subject notation, the last two as phases or features of object notation. All actions must however be actions of the character of one of those classes, they being the only forms of relation between subject and object in action, that is, the only forms in which a subject, or actor, can act upon an object, the thing or person acted upon. And that phase or class of action in general or idea of action where an action stops with its intent and meaning, fixes the character of that^ action, as an action of the character of that class. So here, in teaching, either as subject, the teacher and then as either teacher by himself, educator, or motion towards the boys, or as object and then as either contact of work with the boys, or effect left, on the boys and girls. To set to work boys or girls, in teaching, is what stage or phase, children ? Gh. The third. Te. To talk to children, in teaching, is what stage 7 Ch. The second. Te. So, the actions to talk as teaching, and to set to work as teach- ing, are actions of what classes? Gh. Of the second and the third classes. Te. And a verb expressing the meaning of any of these classes as its meaning, would then, as far as its action goes, be a verb of 21 these classes. And in all actions, of whatever kind, you have to leave off at one cf these stages, as, if you traveled by the Pennsylv., E. E. from Philad. to New York, and it was the only line, you have to leave off at one of its stages, called* stations, and if these places meant something and it was intended to change the places ac- cording to their meaning, as peace, to unrest, and the stations par- took of the character of the places according as they are nearer either to Philadelphia or New York, then the stage yon would leave off; would show your intent as one being nearer either to peace or un-, rest, Philadelphia or Hell-Gate, I mean New York, and this, in travel, as either a thought of or preparation for the gate, and the gate is in your head already the moment you think of travel, at home, or a motion towards it, or a contact with it, or, as effect that is, the gate,, left on you, and a bad, run-away boy will be punished by his father, if not by the police, according as the running-away to New York, is found and discovered, either as the thought and preparation of run- ning away, at home, or as motion, at the depot, or contact, with New York, or effect lefb, as New York upon him — which latter would be a hard case, as he would likely then again run away from the punishment — and a killing is judged and punished by law accord- ing as it was found either as a third phase, of intent, to hit, or, a fourth, to slay and these actions as stages of the idea of travel, of running away, or killing, may be made either all at once as on a through line of action, or as actions at different stages of time, the first time the bad boy thinks and prepares for the running, the second time or day — ^bundling of his courage — he goes to the depot — the third time he goes as far as Jersey City, but goes back — con- science-struck — but the last time — well — then he is gone — each time the same idea of action, as " a running away," though each time different actions, or actions of different character, as run- ning, either as impulse, motion, contact, or effect left. All stages you pass in an action, are merely phases of that action in which the motion of action stops, as, to move the hand, is a phase in the action to hit, whilst all phases may become actions if intended so as the stopping place, in the impulse at the start. Wil. Have we anything like these classes. Professor, in English ? Te. Classes of run-away or of running away, of boys, and killing, as by accident or intent ? Plenty of it, Willie, in America. Wil. I mean classes of verbs. Prof. Not so distinctly marked as classes of verbs, though dis- tinctly marked by us as classes of actions, and so, sometimes, as the name of an action in a verb. Stand up, Willie, in the car, and show me by motions of your hand, the classes of actions as in English . 22 It will not tip over, the car ; it lias borne stronger shakes than you can give when rising now, when it tore through the clouds, along precipices and cliffs, in examination, of doubts of the subject— now we are above them. Wil. How high, how high are we ? Te. A hundred thousand feet (aside : I make this remark for the idiots of the papers; so that they can think they can say something sensible about the book by remarking that children or any beings could not live or breathe at such a height ; there was even no atmos- phere to bear the balloon, forgetting that my children with me hve at any height ot thought, and that the lifting power is the soul that goes as easy to the sun and beyond it as their tipsy bodies go to the grogshop ; easier, at least more steady.) Now show me, by motions of your hand, the meaning of each of those four phases of stations here of this " to teach " in its general meaning, corresponding as motions exactly with any other four mo- tions that might be made with verbs going from the subject to the object, or if the verb does not go the fall length, go as far as the verb goes — as a "to hit," or "to slay," or, here, " to teach so as to talk," or, " to instruct in contact," or any other way — Wil. (Rising), Mind ye, boys — Anita. There are no boys here, only one whom you could mean. Wil. Oh, I mean the others, dowa stairs, that is down on the earth, the little ones, or myself included : I teach you, am your teacher, educator — (pointing to himself). Te. Go on, we want to see something of you in reference to the boys. Wil. (Propping himself in a posture of address). Now, I teach you, talk to you as teacher — (motion of address, with hand towards supposed pupils). That is all subject-notation, describing me, or teaching, as my work — Cleaving it to the boys to do the rest. Te. But suppose the boys won't mind you ? Wil. That is just the third phase, of contact that we come to. I set them to work, putting my finger down, on the work, and if they then would not mind it, I would give them a licking. Anna. That would shake the car. Wil. Oh, the boys are only imaginary, we are not afraid of a ghost of a fight. Anita. Not of a real one ? Wil. That depends. At any rate if we were in we would get through, or die. Te. Eight, Willie. Wil. Now comes the fourth phase or motion, showing by this 23 my motion of hand, you are propped up as men and girls, to stand on your own feet, as being taught, and showing this as effect of my teaching — ^perhaps licking in the case of the boys, included. Te. First rate, may they long prosper without the licking. So you have the classes of action of to teach, as classes of motions of the hand. And why made you these motions, or in actual life when would you make these motions ? Wil. When I am eager to show what I mean. Te. So you see the eagerness of the heart to show what you mean makes the motions and the knowing what you mean causes the kind of motion, as motion of impulse, motion proper, contact or effect left. And you make these kinds of motions often in life without being conscious at all of making any motion, though you are always conscious in that case, of what you mean. And the same kind of motions and eagerness to show what you mean transferred to two lines of motions like "Willie's motion, as of lips and tongue made with spontaneity that is, so that you hardly are aware of it and not con- scious of it at all in speech make the vowels : the rise of the tongue in phases of succession, and describing as rise, the subject, speaker, actor, making the vowels successively, of a, e, i, — ^these in continental pronunciation that is, as you know them in German — as the same line of motion in speech, as protrusion of the lips, makes in succes- sion in speech the vowels a, o, u, — which latter motion in the pro- duction of the vowels you can easily observe with yourself and others, while the former motion, of the tongue, as a gradual rise of the place of sound, to produce the a, e, i you can almost only feel with yourself — lines of sound, these two lines, which your sisters know from the " Umlaut " in German. These vowels, children, spring di- rectly from the action of the heart, as eagerness to explain its mean- ing, expressing will, whilst the consonants, children, spring directly from the action of the brain, to express thought or form. And so in Latin, with the Eomans, which were all will, will incarnate, of action, the vowels of the upper line describing as such a line the actor, come naturally into their line of action as verbs, to discrim. inate as kind of sound the kind of actions : the vowel of impulse, into the verbs of impulse, the vowel of motion, into the verbs of motion, a sound as of contact that is, no vowel or a short sound, into the verbs of contact, and the vowel of effect left, into verbs of effect left, the vowel e of the second phase or stage of vowels, serving as a long or short sound, — long or short here only measured as to its time, not as a change of sound, as in English — ^for both phases or kinds of ac- tions ; and all this as naturally and instinctively, with the Eomans, came into the thought of their verbs as Willie's motions of the hand 24 came with "Willie's tliouglits of tlie verbs, that is, the actions as ex- pressed by the verbs as either a -whipping of the boys, or a teaching by talking, or a setting of the boys to work, or as the raising of my hand to my head might come with the thought of the thirty years of work of teaching as thought of method to teach, that is educate, in the best way; this then only as a sign of a first phase, though I could put my finger also on many fourth phases of effect left, by a dozen les- sons of teaching, at Harvard and other places, ahd could show acts of teaching as of all kinds, by going and for a longer time, through all the phases. Some pupils at college just of late, have left already and taken wives. Anita. Not one, several, professor ? Te. No, Anita, I do not teach that though I practice it. Anita. Then you are a Mormon ? Te. No, Anita, one of my wives is Hail Columbia and the other Mrs. G. Wil. But why does or did this will of action come out with the Eomans just as vowels, and not so with us? Have we not will, too? Te. More than enough. You, not you alone as Willie, you all are all Will. Some say even you were a New Eome, because — your; country, that is, America, looked like a boot. If you were a new Eome, then we would have to look out for a New German to smash you to pieces when you had become like the old. If you wanted to copy then you better copy Jerusalem, and without its r's, the rulers, the rabble and the Eomans. Best you remain what you are, a new creation, through Christ. Since Christianity, will, with us, is action, and so the vowels can not discriminate with us, as a rule, will, of action, as all actions partake evenly of will, though we dis- criminate too by vowels, kinds of will as actions, by two lines — of bright stars — but don't you want to hear these classes of action in Latin? Anita. Oh, Professor, give us not any Latin, above the clouds, I am deadly afraid, we have already enough on board. Nellie. How high are we now up ? Anna. Higher than before, I see it from the stars. Wil. How can you see it from the stars ? Anna. I see more of them at the edge than I saw before. Te. Then I will give it to the others in Latin, and to you, Anita, in English, will that do? Anita. Yes, that will. Te. Then be quiet. " The Laws of Action in the Roman Verbs /" Wil. Professor, did you hear that noise ? Te. I hear no noise, Willie, [except like Wanamaker, what 1 •make. 25 " The Classes of Veebs in Latin as Classes of Actions." Wil. 0, surely, Professor, it is not your own voice ttat I hear. Te. It is surely my voice, "Willie, that makes the noise, and yet the voice that makes the noise, is not mine — " The character of the classes of actions, expressed by the CONNECTING VOWELS of the Verbs." (Getting ready to make the sign of the first class.) Wil. Oh, Professor, did you hear that crash ? What was it ? I hear it now like a distant moaning, of the sea — let us go down. Professor, a storm is surely coming — Te. No storms, Willie, at that height — we make the storms, of mind, that shake on earth. The will of man as mind when right is always in harmony, that is, in a line with what is right on earth. I know what you heard ; you shall presently see it. Beul. Dee. What can we see or how may be seen, what we heard ? Te. You will see what you hear by seeing, and hear what you see, by hearing. Wil. Commutation of senses. Te. Commutation of forces ; the signs transcribed into sounds — the sounds transcribed into signs ; the graves giving up their dead to testify against this race. Anita. Oh, that is awful ! Min. See how dark it gets. Te. It is yet daylight in America. We are several hours back in space, and so ahead in time of night. (Making sign of the first class.) ^^ Impulse I" Nell. Oh, Professor, what a shock, did you feel it ? Te. I did not feel any, I am accustomed to shocks. " Educare, to teach, impulse, as teaching, describing the Educator, to teach, to educate." Ch. What a peal and clap — ^it sounds as if pebbles were thrown against the car — it rattles like hail ! Te. It was an explosion — may be of the vowel against the sky — everything reverberates here a thousand fold — and the rattling of the English after it. Second class, motion, Willie! (making the sign of the second class) : " Docere, to teach, motion of teaching directed towards the object taught, English : simply, to teach, to talk to, to apply himself as Teacher." Anita. It rocks the car, it will upset us. Te. No harm, from mere motion, and no good, here, as in teach- ing, unless it comes to contact ; now hold on to the car. 26. An. Do you feel that cold air, it crashes and cracks as a plough- ing up of the ground from beloTV. Wil. We are too high up, we can not hear anything that is going on on the ground. Te. And yet those that are under us, hear what we say. "We stand on grounds though we are in the air. (Making the sign of the third phase.) " Contact/" Gh. Oh, where are we ? Te. We are at work, now, not merely to teach as to think and to talk, but to set to wotk, to shake, to instruct : " Instruere, to instruct ;" we mean business, children ! ■ Steph. Oh, where are you, Wilhe, Beulah Dee : I do not see you. Stop, Professor, give us no more. 2e. I can not before I am through. (Making the sign of the fourth phase ;) there will now be peace again, and not aU darkness. "Effect left: Erudire, to teach, to make erudite." Now, children, where are you? On your legs again. Why, children, you look like a bundle of Deponent verbs, verbs describing not an action, but the state of an actor in the form of an action, here, your states, all, as a bundle, of philosopher, I philosophize, vereor, I am deadly afraid, fruor, I enjoy, and finally adsentior, I consent, connive. Shall I make the signs to describe these verbs, that is, your states ? Anita. Oh, no, Professor, we feel them all over our body. Te. As a kind of goose-skin — eh? That would be indeed. a Depo- nent state when you had dropped all action, and only offered a state. And when you show that state in action as a verb, then you are a Deponent Verb. But get down again regularly to your seats, and be again an ordinary verb ready to do some action. There is a kind of a 3J or transit class, between the third and fourth class, sitting on the fence as " to flee," to " die," seeking a state, and yet having not got to it, sprigs of verbs that stand with their root in the third class, and hang with their head to the fourth —twin forms of the third, like the third finger is as to the second finger of the hand. Min. What have the fingers of the hand to do with the Latin Verb? Te. They are the classes of verbs, or words of action, as means of action, the human hand, the hand of man. Min. And woman, too ? Te. Yes, Minnie, the fingers as actions^ as the palm of the hand 27 ■ tliroTigh. wMcli run tlie roots of tlie fingers, as " Deponent," passive state, if you tiad been a Eoman Lady such as lived at the time beneath us you would have saved the life or slave put cruelly to fight, and shown this your impulse, by pressing the thumb ; if you would show me the moon now as it rises behind the Apennines, so as to say: do you see. Professor, won't we go home now? then you would make this motion, of showing, by using your first finger ; if you buy at Wanamaker's, which finger would you use to test the texture of goods ? Min. I would not use any finger — Te. How so ? Min. I would take it for granted. Te. But suppose you wanted or needed one to select. Min. I would use — the — ^middle finger. Te. Contact, Minnie; and if you would get married, at what finger or at what finger do you see people sticking engagement and marriage rings as signs of transit or effect left — at least at my time they stuck it at the third finger and little finger. Min. What time is that ? Te. Four hundred years ago. Min. Oh, Professor, you were not born then. Te. I am here, Minnie, as the country discovered, and so I was here when the country was discovered. Min. But do people know or think of all these things when they use their fingers ? Te. As little as the Eomans knew why they said a, e, i, or you, in one case, describing the filler, filling party, say fill, in the other describing the vessel, say fall, or as Minnie meaning Minnie, as pinching, says ; I pinch, and the conductor meaning the ticket, says, I pwnch, though you can see this now from the vowels here as lines. We are a harp, in language, played as to tunes, of sounds, from without, by Laws of God ; using the tunes as we use our limbs, con- scious as to purpose, unconscious as to means ; though we do inves- tigate the use of either. In French where they are very quick, they jump right from the first to the fourth class, of effect left as this is in Latin, leaving their third and fourth class to hang around this their pivot, of effect, the third in French, as a kind of state of effect as state on the actor, the fourth as means to produce effects or alter a state, somewhat like the Latin third — Anna, Beulah, Stephen, what is the matter ? Gh. Professor, do you see that white mist hanging over the ground just below us? Te. The Ghosts of the Osesars — the Eomans, children — are shaken -28 out of their graves, to bear witness to the omnipotent One God who was in their souls with his laws, and held their consciousness in the hollow of his hand, shaping their speech unconsciously to them- selves and now laid bare in these their impulses as will of deeds in speech and Hfe, by this spectrum of their souls, as language. Willie. Spectrum, what is this ? Te. A confession jisually of things, made to things not as things but of their contents, as a glass of some kind, held in the light of the sun, reveals the contents of the sun, or as if a glass of some kind if held before the murderer would reveal the contents of his soul, as murder ; the Ghost in Hamlet^of which you yet will hear — is such a spectrum shown to Hamlet revealing the guilt here, of " Denmark." If the Ghost could have been brought into court, itself, this would have settled the play. As it could not, the guilt had to unravel itself; as the Judgment Day itself is but such a spectrum of man, to man himself seen in the light of the Lord, as traces of virtue, or guilt and crime and being from this when seen in that light, already a bliss or torture, and lasting, as Day, as long as Time and as bliss or guilt, forever. Wil. Will that picture ever vanish ? Te. Ask the "physicists," they deal with forces, the indestructi- bility of matter, and so from this, in their mind, of forces. They are a tail wagged by forces, whilst they in their conceit, think they, as tail, wag the forces. It will not vanish when taken as force, as picture of crime or guilt, to the grave, though it may be dimmed by the light of the Lord which brings it out, and so, may absorb it. Wil. How do we get a good picture ? Te. By seeing, not yourself, but the Lord, in your life-time. Then you wiU get a good picture, "Wilhe. Wil. But how can we see the Lord? Te. By seeing him in his spectrum as man, the Son of Man, showing as a glass, of man, the Lord. "Would you like to see a spectrum of this seeing of the Lord, and his glass, which I trust is at the same time the glass of your souls, and so of a seeing of yoiorself, under these stars of the night? Steph. Professor, you have no glass, and no light. Te. The Holy Ghost of truth, is our light, and the laws of his stars, as the sky of our soul, is our glass. Anna, Beulah Dee. Professor, you are preaching ! Can you show it? Te. Teaching, in the right mind, is preaching, and preaching in the right way, is teaching. "We cannot cut the line of life any- 29 where. And here this line, does it not run up, straight up: to God ? Do you see that star just above us ? Gh. "We see it. Te. Now draw a line in your mind, to that star and beyond it. Nell. "We will try. Te. And do you see that star just opposite to us ? Ch. "We see it. Te. Now draw a line in your mind to that star and beyond it. "Where they meet in their right of way as two lines, what do they form ? Anna, Nellie. A right angle. Te. Now is that right angle, beyond and far beyond the stars, more a right angle than it is here with us ? Wil. It is not more a right angle beyond the stars than it is here with us; in fact, it would not be a right angle at all if it did not come to a point. Te. That point is Christ, as the will of God. The will of God be- yond the stars is not more will than it is here, at the angle, the point. Now draw as a line, beyond the stars as far in infinity as you can, or think you can, a line of a circle connecting the Hues, and call it intellect, of God, as kind of intellect, and now draw a line at the inner point between the lines, around the point, right over my hand, is there a difference in these lines, as kind of lines, from each other ? Wil. None, whatever. They are a part, each, and the same part, of a circle, running like. Te. You will say, parallel — . Wil. Parallel with each other. Te. Now call this inner line, intellect of Christ, as kind of intel- lect, is there a difference now between these intellects, as kind, the intellect of Christ and that of God, as kinds ? . Wil. I don't see any. Te. But the length of the lines, their range as lines, is there a dif-. ference? All Children. There is. Te. That is, if we could see the other,* outer Hue, there was or would be then, a difference, as time. But as we cannot seethe outer line — ^you cannot see infinity as line — there is no difference for us, in time, between that inner line which we can see and an outer line which we cannot see, whatever. The line of intellect of Christ is then, for us, our line, that is the line we see and can see as intellect of God. Now take or seek the centei', of this line as your own center for kelp and you hayefuith /now take this faith as help in your own outline of life drawn through time and eternity and you have justi-. 30 fication ; now take this justification as gained by tlie going down in blood, of this center, for us, through us, our own like with humiliation to death, and you have salvation, and which when accepted as such, and as so ordained from eternity, for us, to leave us, free as spirits, to sin and yet, though being sinners or having sinned to make us saints, with praise to God, is atonement. Now drop the Hnes we drew to the stars as parts, and take the whole circle, with Christ as center for your life and you have Christianity, explained as life. Wil. But life, in explanation, is not life. Te. It is as much as there is of the center in it, even as explanation. Wil. A center is not in pieces or parts, it is — a center or no center. Te, It is or may be a part that is, sometimes wanting, as line. The heathen drew their lines without a center and we know and you know too as you heard of it, how awkward, how painful, how uneven and unjust was their line. The Christian draws his line with the center ; there is nothing needed' but the bond of the compass and the steadiness of its application. The merit of the line is not in the line but in the center ; and where the line fails, there was no center, for that part, and so, a center in part of a line as a whole. Now drop the sight of the center with time, yet keep its line, and yoB have life in infinity with Christ forever. Wil. How can we drop this center as sight and yet keep it as a line? Te. Don't you drop the nut, as nut, and keep it as tree ? Wil. It keeps itself. Te. So does the center, through its poles, in us. Wil. "What are " poles ?" - Te. Adjusted points of good or bad in us, as life or action which where they act as good, make everything square, and where they react as bad, make everything crooked, a circle. So we live as either good or bad, straight or crooked through all eternity with Christ, that is in his presence as Christ, according that he was our center in life or no center. This is an explanation of the infinite in forms of the finite, for the benefit of those who are yet finite, children, in their infinity. Now you have heard, boys and girls, what you saw as Willie's, and have seen and see what you heard, as the dead I — But why do we want that line, of the intellect of Christ, to see God ? S'ppose we take our own? Can I make music like Mozart's? Ch. We do not know. Te. Can 1 draw hke Raphael ? Anna. I hardly suppose, for you laughed often yourself with us at the pictures you drew of the "hunters " in our lessons. 'A 1 - — 31-^ Te. Can I write like Shakespeare, like Milton ? Can I sing like Patti? Anna. I guess not. Wil. Why not? Anna. The Professor would then not he teaching, he would sing. She makes money. Te. And this, teachers do not, you are right, Anna, that teachers make no money. But then, people buy tickets to hear Patti and spend money to get a Eaphael, or hear a Mozart, why not make the music ourselves, or paint ourselves or sing ourselves ? It takes genius of some kind to do this, to sing, to draw, to paint but it takes no " genius of all kinds," to see God I Can a bushel hold more than a bushel, or a peck more than a peck ? But with those that think they need Patti, but they don't need Christ, a peck can hold a bushel. It takes of itself a good sized soul, of the size of a bushel, to hold a bushel, and eyes, as of God, to see God! But through Christ it is changed. He brought the sight and size down to the capacity of each. Those who have the size of a peck will hold it as a peck, and those who have the capacity of a bushel will hold it as a bushel,, but each time full size. Min. How did Christ effect this ? Te. By changing the size of the sight of God to the size of an image, as man. Those that are of the capacity of a peck, will now hold it as a peck, and those that are of the capacity of a bushel will hold it as a bushel, but each time, full size, because each one knows from his own knowledge of man, the size of man. Beulah Dee. But how has Christ grown for us to this power of change? Te. Through the fulfillment of time, as this rose grew on the bush and the bush as time, though the bush was already foreseen in the dust and the rose in the root : the power of will and intellect of God working here for us as time till it broke forth for us into sight, as the- sending of the bush with its rose. Could the bush have grown as rock, could the rose have grown on the root, could it have grown as stem? But it sprang from the root and it sprang from the stem but from these, as the root and the stem of a rose. And when you. want to see what a rosebush is, in its beauty and perfection, as bush,. do you look to the stem and root, or to the rose ? Ch. "We look to the rose. Te. And if you want to see what mankind is in its perfection of man, and so its intent as man, do you look to the root or the stem ? Ch. We look to Christ. 32 Te. And if you want to know what God is, do you look to God through yourself, or through Christ? Gh. We look in sense — Te. And the logic of looking — to see — Gh. Through Christ. Te. But though there was his line, and as a line for you, but your eye was scratched— can you see the stars when your eye is scratched, though they are clear and bright as stars ? Gh. We could not. Te. And so you see it takes a clear sight and sober, healthy eye to see the line of Christ though you had him as line, and seeing him as line, to see God. So you have now this spectrum of a seeing of God through his glass, as a glass, in the means of its make as pure as this night. It takes a universe, of wisdom of God, to reconcile freedom and salvation in justice. It won't do to blame the Lord, when you have done something wrong, and to praise yourself when you have done something good. Either you are a tree, then praise the Lord when you have done something good as does the tree, by its blossoms, or, you are a man, then when you have sinned dare not to try to face the Lord by laying the blame on him. These dunces of science that deal with forces and forget the first force, of logic as a justice of forces or that adjustment which holds in balance and power, aU the rest. Destroy that logic or justice, and there will be no forces. There will be but one force which eats up all the rest. What you call laws is but that adjustment of forces as foreseen lor the whole whilst each force as such acts but for itself and which as such an ad* justment for the whole, is the proof of the presence of a force as a force for the whole, that is mind, to make that adjustment. Grant right and wrong as forces and you need infinity as repair-shop or Christianity in logic. But if you grant these not, then I will make your argument fly as a kite, which is a toy of forces, but no force in itself. Why do you argue and don't go to bed — I can not be wrong, nor, either, you ever be right. Min. Oh, Professor, we get higher and higher, I feel it from 'the motion of the car. Te. Higher and higher, in faith, and deeper and deeper down in science. Is there not a point where their lines, kept on running, in infinity, and so bending as a circle may meet in Christ ? Hymn of Science on Christ. 1. I mean to stand up for the Freedom of Man, in the Sky, as on Earth. 83 2. But with. Freedom comes Sin, and with Sin, as freedom from sin, comes Christ ; 3. As the chick from the egg ; as a chick, in his case, from the egg of the thought of a world as thought by the Lord, in Time. 4. The Trees need no Christ for they are skves, to the will of the Lord, but the son, in his Freedom, aiAd Sin. 5. The Law will not do, with sin, in its will ; for it will not and cannot obey ; 6. Nor mere Grace will do it, for it pays not for sin, in its will, and its damage to Justice and Life. 7. Then here comes Christ, to save you from sin, and Freedom and Justice and Life, ■ ; 8. He pays for your sin by paying for his coming as Christ. 9. He asks, not as Law, he offers no Grace without a fair bar- gain in turn ; 10. He asks you, and asks in the name of the Lord, for he loves you, to die for forgiveness, to sin, 11. And pays for bringing this message of love, to the Law of the Lord with his Life. .12. Then you plunge to His Death, to this Current of Love which breaks your reluctance and hate, 13. And from the depth of this death, on his shoulders of love, he then lifts up your will, and the will of a world, as his own. 14. There is Freedom in this, and Justice, and Life. 15. There is now no Law ; 16. And yet there is no sin ; 17. There is Freedom from Sin, and a Unit of Love in the hate of the world, 18. And Redemption, in Freedom, from Sin. Now examine an egg, and examine a chick, of this world, and this^ egg of a world with its Hen, which calls you as chick, for their life. And though here is the lense, and here are the chick, you trace them in vain for their life. Though I showed you in faith with a lense as of mind, the presence of that Hen and its life, in an, egg, as the egg of a world, that is, the presence of God in his wisdom as God, in this egg, of this world, as Its God, Its Saviour, Its Christ. Yet this spectrum and sight of the presence of Christ in the egg of the thought of this world, is, as a spectrum and sight, not more and not more a mere spectre as sight, than the sight of the fact of the presence of God with his Laws, at the time, in the hearts of those that are now spectres, the Eomans, as a fact of their language or the 3 . 84 sight of the fact of the presence of God with us, in his word through Christ, as a fact of our souls. Now drop this message to— Rome. The creation as such of man, makes no difference in these, as to Freedom, sin, or Christ. The question is only what was the intent of the Lord. If the Lord intended to make a man and made first a monkey, I am satisfied and travel with the intent of the Lord, through the monkey. The dust I would carry with me in this as a part, as the dust of a monkey, is certainly as respectable as the dust of the field I now carry as man. But if the Lord intended to make a monkey, and the monkey by an accident of his own (accidents,^ they call it, children), became by itself, that is, in course of time, a man, then I might be happy as a Beecher or a monkey, but would be sorry as man. And you see, it takes more to make a monkey than to make a man. It took the Lord to make the monkey, but it only took the monkey to make the man-^But he never intended to make the monkey, he never made the monkey, it came irom an ox— And the ox? — From a deer — ^And the deer? — From a turtle — Have patience, my stars, and the turtle ? — From an oyster — And the oyster ? What ails you, children ? Min. 0, it is so very close. Te. Yes, it is, and it will get closer still. And the oyster ? From a tree. And the tree ? From a stone. And the stone ? From dirt. And the dirt ? From dust. And the dust ? Min. Oh, Professor, I am going to faint, if it will hold on — Te. It will not hold on — ^it can not, it will pass over. And the dust ? From something. — And that something ? — That was— /or- ever. Minnie, children, promiscuously. Oh, Ah, air, I suflbcate 1 Te. Take that sentence, the shower of it will refresh you (with raised voice): Forever, is — A long time — by this time, all ought to have reached its final stage; aU the world ought to be, either, dead, or men and monkeys 1 — Oh, then, it waa nothing, it came from nothing; the difference is so very slight, in infinity, it amounts to nothing. — Then your argument which you offer in infinity, as something, in infinity, that is, absolutely, also amounts to nothing, and I defy you not to steal my time. — Oh, it is something, as an argument, spiritually, though bodily nothing.— And that Argument, spiritually, and bodily oothing, which charged the nothing to be something, whilst preserv- ing the stages, with the last stage foreseen as Freedom, man, sin, Christ, is, or we call it — God 1 Ch. Oh, what a terrific clap ! Te. An explosion of Gases — they rose with the spectres, driven =— 35 by the wind — ^it ploughed the roots of the Apennines : Ko stage or phase can develop itself into a new stage or phase, under the idea of action, except under a new impulse; as subject, from the idea of the object. The phase to move the hand or arm as an action can never become the action to hit, so as to strike or to slay, without a new impulse or idea of the actor. The phase itself as " move," may develop and show itself in many forms, as to move or apply head and thought of thinking as teaching, heart as mourning, light as shining, these will make new species of that action to move, side- ways, crossways, upward, downward, in new features as forms or materials, but the phase will never become a new genus, a new action, the action to hit, and to strike, except this idea of the new action, as to hit and to strike, as a new genus of action, was alreadyv in the impulse, as impulse or idea of that action. Arid thus, idea, as present in the first stage, is what either keeps the stage, or moves it to another stage, creating a new action, and that idea holding the whole, and which, knowing all the stages, either keeps each or move's as to place and time, and each time meaning each of the stages, in its kind, either as a mere station, or just in this its number as stage or final phase, is thought, as God's, though a later phase or stage may pass or have to pass through previous stages, while its thought as new stage must always have been present with the start as impulse. We have four main stages of created things, and as many sub- and sub-sub-phases, and though the line of transit is sometimes close, as between night and day, still their lines are lines, and meant as lines, as night is night and day is day, and day is not night, and night is not day, for us, and as thought of the Lord who meant sleep, as night and work, as day, and so meant to separate night and day, and to keep them separate, to whatever extent they may merge and look both like night when compared with his final day, or may look like day when measured by death as death of the eye, or mental blindness^ and though it may take in counting as it took always, an " evening" and a " morning" to maike with the day, a " day"-— and thousand years are befoi'e him like a day. The rest is madness — not science —as chaos or monkeys. And there is no chaos, see these stars ! And there is no monkeys, see these children! ever present living God, I thank thee for these children — though I might thank thee sometimes for a monkey, too, as critic, but all in its place. Min. O, the stars shine now out again beautifully, they were dim for a time. ' Steph. But, Professor, with whom were you talking? Te. Perhaps you heard my thoughts, the air is so very light. /S'iepA. How can we hear your thoughts ? 36 Te. Just as you see my words— here they are ! Gh. The Ghosts! Te. The men, and women — the explosion has changed them, to men and women again— now they are sweeping by to stand forever as fixed stars, of confession of thought by the spectrum of their lan- guage, among the stars, and witnesses to the presence of the Lord with his laws, among the heathen where these heathen themselves were not present with their own consciousness — ^but we must hurry home, and overtake the night, otherwise, we will arrive too late at night time at Philadelphia, and Wanamaker has closed if we wanted to deliver the balloon — Anita. It is not his balloon- — Te. The bigger would be the suit of clothes, children — and we might indeed, mistake Smith's Island, from its glare, for Philadel- phia — And such a spectrum, for the country of its own madness, was the murder of Garfield — the Teacher-President — ^whose spirit is with us in these days of the fight — Min. Do you mean to — Te. I mean to — and that presently — and to smash — obstacles — Min. But if they will smash you — Te. They won't. They cannot, they are dead — before the fight — But let the Dead now bury the Dead, and consign their bodies to the grave — our case is the Living — their souls are with us and the Laws of the Universe, — a kind of migration of soul, in this, of this soul of the heathen — a wander and change as soiil, without leave — • from youth as mankind to manhood as mankind, from childhood as understanding to an always more perfect day — ^more perfect forms — the seeds as planted as seed by the Lord in the past, now bloom- ing as tree — more binding as mankind, more present as laws, more deeper as feeling — more shining as light — but also, more guarding as guardian, more purer as life ? And so one people goes rolling over another people — and over itself— in times of weakness — and new strength is gained from a time of delay and rest, and it leaps with a bound where it would have crawled in dejection and new blood is infused into the sluggish veins of man and mankind, and so at tliese hands of the dead, we come to the Living — and the thought of th6 Sky of the North which smashed the Eomans — Three times — that is, as a Defini as one of the Representatives of a cer- tain method of teaching told me, as a " definition," of that Defini you will yet see what this Defini is, children—" I always tell my pupils, when you can say, one, two, three, that is the Defini " — which definition is a spectrum of the substance of that method, and which as method again, itself is but a spectre of teaching as it needs for success a body of time yet wants to teach without having that body and so, floats, hke a groan or a sigh in the air, and 37 which, as a method of pupils, is again a spectrum of the gullibility of these pupils, and which gullibility of these pupils is again a spectrum of the times, the laziness of the times — so you see, children, the spectra multiply as soon as one is touched — brought about by hundred methods, affecting the public : the clown cracks its jokes to them, the minister speeches his speech to them, Patti sings for them, Wanamaker signals for them — the weather, at the store, so that the " dear creatures " have nothing left to them — or there is nothing left to them but to go for it, not the weather, but that store, and to go for them that have the money, and for them, to go for the money and they are in a hurry and want to leave — by the next steamer — for Europe — for the moon — for they are going — everywhere — except home — ^ Min. Oh ! Professor, where are you going to ? Te, To Berlin, we are off, a hundred thousand miles a minute, a second, around the world, sideways, crossways, all ways like a blast, a whirlwind in a circle, to dry up the swamps in which grows that method and to come back by that circle which is the only straight line because it is absolutely crooked, that is, any point at that line if a straight line is put opposite that point, will be found straight whilst the whole is crooked — which is the reason that here, that is, there, in Philadelphia — everything is so lovely straight — for each good Philadelphia child — and citizen — of Philadelphia because they see, each, always but one point, never two of them together, and so everything seems to them so lovingly straight whilst the whole is crooked — crooked as to the four elements : fire, water, air, and earth, and the three R'S of the schools— making^even in all, and nobody is able to keep straight unless he gets crooked to that line — unless he jumps that line — and goes straight through — with a crash, like the Bullitt Bill — or a passage^through the Public Buildings — at the time that stone fell off the Coat of Arms, of Pennsylvania — with Independence — and by magaanes where the public sits on benches, to see the fight in its leaves, and where there is no more thought to take a part in it, than as at a circus, in the ride or at fireworks to take more part than simply to see it— when the big rocket goes off, ah! — and then all is over — no joining of hands in thought, no partnership of interest— all excitement, of the moment— and to the limit of that magazine and the likes of its " Public " — show me a man who writes for magazines and I will show you a man whose soul saw an undertaker and is to be left at home when he goes to see the publisher, and when he sees the publisher, then the '■ public " Is with him and he, the publisher sees the public and not the soul — and if a woman writes — for magazines then it is double high pressure of tongue, for she has to make up in boldness "what she lacks in rights — and has to have her heart in thinking and that is horrid while if she has her thought as heart it is glorious — and the fault of fawning — Min. What is fawning, Professor ? Te. Wagging a tail where you ought to have some teeth, blacken boots where are no boots to blacken, for a penny — no fault of our or your own people, no braver people on the globe, like wax, for teaching, like steel for fighting, daring, bold, generous, ingenious, inventive, at once the vivacity of the French, the stubbornness of the Dutchman, the pluck of mind of the Ger- man, the pride of the Spaniard, the fearlessness of the Huguenot, the dogged- ness of sturdy wit and business of the English, and the Irish, with bias of creeds enough to make it savory, with pride of country enough- to hold it together, with aims lofty and sufficient to expand it over the universe— daring the devil to peep out of Hell, jumping at Heaven if it is yet miles off— riding Uke a 38 — burly boy on the topmost part of the shoulders of Time and crowing for pleasure— standing at half-cock when at rest, standing with the hair-trigger when ready for action— a fly can make it fly off— a wave of the hand can put it at rest^but the fault of the Leaders who corrupt this boy and put fleas in his ear and talk nonsense to get at his inheritance and pick his pockets whilst I tell him get down, Sir, and learn your lesson otherwise I am afraid when school time comes you will be kept in or get a licking, you are n»t yet fit for this world of ours, you belong to another, not that you had to learn America, for you have it in your bones and that is the difference between an American and a foreigner that he, the American, has it, freedom in his bones whilst the other has yet to learn it as the same kind of difference is between us and Christ, that he had God in his soul and we have to get Him through Him and that Centennial has turned his head, from what he heard his elders say to him of it, if he had seen it himself, he would have been kept sober, from .its logic — invite the Kings to celebrate a RepubUc — he would have laughed at it though they swallowed it and it was put down perhaps with a view to busi- ness that it might be wE^gged as a tail of the Republic but I am afraid the tail this time, wags the Republic as ever since that Centennial everything is a market — it is not the loss of money but a principle which makes us poor to call stealing smartness and so make it perennial — ^will not some woman take care of that boy, in his wildness for he is all left alone with himself, and God is far off, in the Churches, and he won't mind Bridget— the reason is be is an Ameiican and Bridget js Irish, though Bridget is of age and that might make a difference, but it does not, and his father is away, on 'change, left early, or at the North-pole, or the South-pole, or around Cape Horn, until we have the Canal, and then we will have the fight and the decision of the question whether we are we, or somebody else, that is, whether we are for us, or somebody else, that is, whether a piece that belongs, not to us, though it is a ' part of the world will have to be controlled by us, or by — Bridget and the fight of our households will be the fight of the world and Lord God in Heaven will fix it in his wisdom and justice, for that boy and for Bridget and our Ladies are verita:ble Queens, but that is the trouble, where is the subject? for a queen without a subject is like a " shadow without a shade," children, magnificence without giving any benefits to those that seek that shadow — and the cry goes all over the Land ; Where is the Nigger, to do our work — and is joined in by Bridget, but the nigger is nowhere, and is coming from abroiad — and they try to keep him and are corrupting already the minds of the young to keep this nigger^ — by abridgement of suffrage, eh ? — under pretext of some Big Church which is harmless without Relics and so they go and scrape the relics from all corners of history and their households to feed their own vanity and so with this, themselves as food very meet for that Church, to its big mguth — and it smagks its hps and says : well done, give us more, where is thg next corner-grogshop that will detract the living not in piety but in feasts to corpses — of the past, for I feed on corpses — and so, aiding their fear of that Church, instead of killing it — by culture of the present, and interests different from those I saw in a reply I got when I told him who is now a bishop that students could now read the New Testament in Greek, in sixteen lessons, and he told Me with a sneer that coming from within and shooting outward with a whim and zest bespoke more a future coming of horns of cattle than of the Holy Ghost's that the " Church had no interest in such things " what things ? to be able to read The Word of God in the Language he spoke it in 39 — ^ to us, in sijcteen lessons— pray what interests has then that thUrch interests in? kettledrum and hops and cries and speculations — at sea-shores? maybe you belong to that church, then I carry you as Christ's but drop that church or, its " bishop " — stop your waste and you want no nigger — • — and the new nigger that is coming over grows over night to twenty times the size of a Lady, sucking in with astonishing rapidity all that is poison in our atmos- phere, leaving away all that is wholesome and manly and womanly— though this may be the Lord's way to raise the nigger, on purpose, to lower our pride or to compel us to change methods— to change us, not freedom ! ! leave what is good and change what i? bad — and so, as the President serves to them and the alderman serves to them and the minister runs the machine for them and the choir sings for them, and the whole is merely a ques- tion of money they cannot see why the teacher can not learn for them, in twenty lessons, a language, German, Latin, Greek, French, Spanish, Italian, Dutch, Russian, anything at all except English which takes six- teen years of school and life time — but French and German — they merely need to jump at it as language to get it — and the rest, as the leaders tell them, — ^though we teach all about French, German, Greek, etc. "each in a time amounting as space of time to not more than the time between morning and sunset and have by such teaching as time and reason why ? sent students to College — as you know, children and have heard of it — and a writer once said there was no time in the world's history where a first-class nund would get such a respectful hearing and attention as now, ridiculous ! attention means, first the other and not your self, with its whims, notions, hobbies and there is no chance for any mind all over the world, to get a hear- ing except he gets it as my friend the Senator, then prefect got it when he quelled a certain little rebellion of ill will among the boys of some college by taking it for what it was, not a questiqn of intellect but of will and sailing in and taking hold of, knocked them into as many corners as there were columns around the building, and so supplied what was missing — or as Sherman went to the South, straight through it — to make them spell " United States " not, as " States — United," or as I got it in a case with a friend who always before had a good hearing, as to school reforms, but which hearing latterly seemed affected or he was embarrassed, by the tinkling of rings around him, the natural form of evolution it seems, of a union of freedom and selfishness, until I told him in a way of voice that suited his ailing : that I could not see why they should be permitted to run pay schools, for money, on untaxed property — and now he thinks me a genius with benefit undoubtedly sometimes for those schools — and that laziness of work goes all over the world, there are too few that do work and too many that do not work and merely prey on the work of others — and the cry comes from the mine and the workshop : they kill us with work — though labor given as a curse, was meant as a blessing if we understood its way to lead to blessing — and so, understanding, not fists, will change that curse — and if now a book is written and they want to say something about it without having read it, I will tell them what to say, of this book : horrid, atrocious, outrageous, unheard of, a book to quote or as they may quote and adapt to its case, the reputed words of the Old Duke, on "Schiller's Robbers," "if I had had to make the world and would have known that such a book was to be written in it, I or we would not have ma,de it " — ^let us quote the High School Primer, Manual, no, not the High School Primer, the Congregationalist on the High School Primer, — the book of the ^40 " Tropflein, " children, and of the " Staar " and the '• Kinder und der Mond." and the class book for thirty free classes in these last years for the Public Schools of Philadelphia— we can only live, and breathe, in his words : " we began to wade into its pages, but speedily got beyond our depth. As a con- spexus of the general distribution of compliments of action, reduced to objec- tive Poles (H2) and a usarius of German conjugations in "Umlaut," quack! quack ! it is square inch to the foot ; with Singular but double back action par- allelepipedon in green covers— but there, we need not go further. The author is either a geniufe, or— something else (P. S.) private, to our printer: no occa- sion for correcting proof of foregoing paragraph" — that will relieve us — and save me a " Postscript " — Sleph. Professor, the car is on fire ! Te. It shines but does not burn, we have entered the northern atmosphere where everything is charged with the electricity of thought — strike any chord and it will flash fire as an electric light hung in the sky to illumine sur- roundings and show by their shadow the size of men we have to deal with on earth below — I want to settle with that public before I give it any other book — and what will hinder when once the idea of having " fee simple " in trusts whether these be truth, or money gets into the head of clerks that they do not run away with the money of the company as this editor and editors run away with this and other books — and of that book, you will say : ot an impudence indescribable, a boldness unbearable, a directness appalling — ploughing through icebergs as if they were butter, sailing over and wiping the clouds as if they were cobwebs, riding us down and treating us as Press as what we are. Daisies sometimes, and Darlings sometimes, and generally dunces, kicking away the body of the public of to-day as if it was the carcass of a mad dog — good only to substantiate Professor Thompson's of the University of Pennsylva- nia : " the actual increase of insanity in American Society shows that we cannot go on as we have been going, unless we are prepared to reconstruct society inside of the walls of the insane hospital " — and proving this as truth — in us, and that is the worst of it — and that public is a beast, sitting on its haunches waiting to be fed, with taffy and all the windmills are at work — the people of yesterday that is dead sitting in judgment on the people of to-day we call the Public — and so no man ever but lies when he speaks to the Public and so no man ever but has to speak the truth when he speaks to the people for his own conscience as people stares him into his face whilst with the public there is the lie, the past sitting as an incubus on the present consulting its ease and so he must lie, not to disturb its ease — and of that book you say : ridiculous, absurd, preposterous, pretentious, highly dramatic, out of date — ^laying claims to new wonders of science, as of mind, as if there were any new wonders of any new science, except cookery, and as if there was a time of wonders — the old won- ders of yesterday being already stale. Telegraphy, Telephony, Steam and Elec- tricity—and they are Elephants that have absorbed, in their bulk, all that there was of science, anywhere, as we know who have gone over the whole of it, all, the whole world, and seen nothing but ourselves, and elephants and megatheriums, as a first stage, and monkeys as the last, and no mind, not a vestige of it except what little we put into it ourselves, the whole being but a huge show of matter, and if there was anything that was new and could be seen, would not we with the heads of drunkards, as logic, and bellies of glut- tons and dyspeptics, as digestion of truth, and souls as of dogs, you know, or stone, or dirt waiting for the publisher to shape it, the public to see and ex- • 41- amine it, the minister to sniff and question it whether it be found acceptable to good society, have seen it— long before ? But the question is, how to get at it — ^now, since it is out — stop it — by silence — that would only echo it, and they will think we are dead, treating it, and talking of it, in earnest, that would be horrid, nothing more horrid than to be in earnest, on anything ! ! — ' making fun of it ? then they will think we are hurt, we will catch his wires, his wire — and cut it, and if we are thundered by it — to perdition — and so they caught it, and you see, children, we are safely back to where we left off, our subject, the Northern Sky — only its other end as line of subject — the thought as Sky having been changed into Sky, by our rapid American Flight, that is, action, from Pole to Pole — as Berlin and Rome, our journey— with its classes of will as action — ^hail ! NortUand home, of men of thought and men of action — ^how the air is bracing, bracing to the fight- Tune the harp Draw your sword Trust in God Keep your powder dry ! — Min. Oh, Professor, see that beautiful bright line of stars shooting up, up, from us, towards the north, now white, now orange, now red, what can that be ? And there is another one shooting out again from us, straight out, as white, and blue, and indigo color. Do you see them? Te. Of course, I do. If I had not seen them before you could not have seen them. They are the phases of sound as you saw them beforfe with the Latin, now seen too, as phases of color, that is, light, and I can read them ? Nell. You can read them ? Te. Why not, Nellie? Are not the colors, phases of light, those phases as light which before you saw as lines and phases of vowels ? And are not the vowels and they stand here as light, simply the phases of the motion of the voice from the heart in sound, as you had them with Latin and as they stand in that natural order of phases as two lines, in the mouth ? And are not can, may, and Will, the motions, that is phases, of the heart, as will of \h.e inner man, and shall, owght, and mwst, the motions of heart, as will of an "outer man" and indicated as such phases of will as you hear by phases of sound, in spelling? So the phases and lines as you saw them with Latin, as phases of light in lines, are the white, orange and red and from these, and opposite to them, the indigo and blue ; as phases of sound, of the heart, they are as the same lines, the a, the e, the i, and then from us, the o, and the u ; and as phases of will and as the same lines they are, as will of the inner man, the words of the upper line, the can, and the may, the wiil, 42 and as will of the "outer man"— that ..''outer man," O mark it chil- dren !— the shall, the owght, themwst ! and burning as such phases of will, with the light of the phases of sound in spelling/ Keep these stars, and a copy — ^here is it — as stars for you life — ^you will never, seeing these stars in their lines and the meaning of these their two lines, get astray. Each star, therefore, a triple star, of sound, meaning and color. And so it is three things in nature, what you see, these phases as lines that you see : as light they are colors, as sound they are vowels, and as motions of the heart itself, they are will as phases of such will — and in speech they are words with phases of meaning as words, and found, when examined, to express these their phases" of meaning as words by phases of sound or their spelling as words,' in Grammar. Copy of the Constellation of the North as Classes of Will, as action, each star a triple star, of sound, meQ,ning and color. Where are the Eomans, the Greeks ? Where are these classes of words as helping words of mood, of potentials, in Greek and Latin? They are swallowed in the actions, the verbs. Look sharp at them, these words, stars, colors of will that rose with Christianity, children, and never forget them : "I Will" "Imaj/" * * * * * * "lean" » * * * * *^ "I shall" "loMght" "Imwst" Min. And here is a new line blazing out between them from the white : as yellow, green and purple. Te. No line, Minnie, only the reflex of the two lines, as eitheir and neither which where they meet and mingle as opposite stars make the German " Umlaut," — the absorption of the form of the sound of the vowels ol the lower line, by the force of those of the upper, holding as line of reflex, the meaning of both lines, lie innear and the outer man, and so, with the mystic, all absorbing comprehensive "werden," - — ^43 — " to bescoQie," in its souiifi ^^4 laeaning at tlie start being tlie pivotj hinge, children, oja whieh swings all wilfts tbouglit, of the world. Ch, How do they read ? Te. They read as middle-line — grasping both and meaning either and neither along, (Werden) kbnnen diirfen mogen miissen. Anna. I see them as yellow, green, violet— i Te. But you remember, they are not a line^-they are only a re+ flex of two lines upon each other so you must, to locate them as colors, read them with and among the colors of the other lines— Min. O, I see a rainbow ! They are a rainbow with its curve towards us — ■ Te. A rainbow of thought, at night, without the sun and without calling in the aid of that moon. Eead, the colors— Minnie and other Children. Here they are, the red, orange, yellow; green, blue, indigo and violet — all are there. All Children. AH all there, the vowels there as lines in the order of the rainbow. Te. The German sky of will as thought of action, in the colors of the rainbow, a brood of chickens of thought in the sky— catch them, here is the copy : u A) o u the mother color and sound, of white light and unbroken sound froii^ which sprang the chicken, of colors and sounds, as A, left out, In Sanscrit, an old language, children, the mother is still with all the brood. Wil. A new constellation — Te. For the hea,ds of Europe-r-And yet I know another constelr lation, or sight, more bright than this, not of fixed colors, as rainbow, of will as t^ipught, ba^ gl^ifting as Z^e, shifting and changing in colors and filling the sky. Minnie and Children, see, Professor, what happens "v^th oujp 44 Eainbow, — ^it breaks up iiJines — ^between the old first lines of tbe vowels — ^new lines — shooting up, from us — ^in all colors — ^instead of lines in colors, we have now colors as lines — shifting, quivering, vanish, ing, coming and going between our former lines— now rising, now sink- ing — a waving and vanishing — a contest of colors — ^now all lines burning as one color and now all colors running and burning as one line — a waving, a mingling, a fairy-dance in the sky ; you hear their lai^hter but you hear not their feet — and now one line stands out distinct and trembling, by itself and now it breaks and bursts into many lines, into many colors — all will — all life — all will of action, all action of life — one thing as all colors, many things as one color— Te. A Eainbow of life and colors, — ^not of thought, but of life, more varied than thought — the language of life transcribed into colors — ^the colors of life transcribed into language — Ch. A language of colors — Te. A language of life — a language in colors as Life. The Life of a Language, in the coUrs of the shy ! The English Language^- Nel. The AURORA Borealis— Te. Life as language ! The " Umlaut " of the Abe! the rainbow as Thought changed, into lines as Life — every line a meaning — Anna. ^^ Every thought a sound." Te. How can you know ? Anna. I read it in your book. Te. Then say the whole, the quotation as applied to English. Anna. " Like an angel I would be With these fleshly bonds unbound In communings heavenly — Every thought a tuneful sound." Te. And yet a reflex only, this Northern Light, of the big "I " of your grammar, as it stands in your soul, on the background of speech and as this big " I " itself, is but a reflex of that bigger " I " of Chris- tianity, that we drew between those lines, as a feature of time, to the stars, and with which big " I," when you live, you will live and of which, if you die you would die as your alleged first cousins, the Eomans, did of yore. Happy people that has in thought the Sky of the North and in Life the Will and the Clime of Italy — may you never get smaller — ^by getting larger — than yourself. And over there, that speck of light, on the Excuse of a Eiver, a streak of light now, is Berlin, the great city and home, of wisdom — and the helmet of William, the Emperor, who " takes no presents " as I know — ^fi-om letters of the Emperor's himself— then he ought to buy what is offered as presents, to keep the run of what is offered with letters, to his Academy — and this Academy too, the great light — 45 Min. They look so dim. What kind of light do they burn there ? Te. The very worst candle-grease stuck on holders of tradition. I told them plainly all about the verb as I told you, children, and much, and many things, more — and they heard it with open mouths. Anita. What did they say ? Wil. Don't you hear, they heard it with open mouth, and how can they say anything when their mouth is open ? Anita. I thought they had shut it since. Te. They haven't ; and so they still stand with open mouth, look- ing west, a monument to themselves, unless I shut it on invitation, or request of the Emperor — ^by repeating the message. Anita. They may get lock-jaw. Te. They might, and it would be a pity and as they are otherwise good men, and it would be bad if they could not say what they know, and use their mouth, we wiU relieve them — ^from risk — give them this that will enable them to shut their mouth and open it at ahy time they may have something to say on science. Eead it to them, Minnie. Steph. Will they hear it? Te. Of course, they will— they hear everything, but do not always say something — Min. In what light of reading, Professor, shall I give it ? Te. In the light of the car. Min. I mean as what message. Te. As Minnie's message, to the Academy ; it goes over Philadel- phia — ^they have direct hues. Min. For the Academy ! (reading): Copy. To the President and Vice-president of the Sections of the Great American Association for the Advancement of Science — ^presented at their yearly meet- ing, last faU, in Philadelphia — Family News ; BiETH of a New Sciekce, The Geometby op Thought, or the reduction of forms of Geo- metry to Thought; a science able to demonstrate the identity of motion and action, their laws being the same, only the one is nega- tive, the other positive in its character ; a science which will free the circle of its centre, the square of its lines, by substituting " poles;" which will give the moral value of a curve, imposing laws on beauty, and so, shooting along on these outlines, of created facts, trace brood- ing mind, hovering over dust, in its intent. This science, applied to languages, gave successive spectra of the Boman and Qreeh mind, and then, with the transfer of the material of these languages to other languages, with keys special and general. 46 successive spectra of tlie people that speak these languages, En^ish included' — "spectrum" here, as self-acting record of the psychic in- fluences at work in the mind in the moment and act of speech — fhe •" spectrum " having first been found, realized, in German. The discoveries are stated in the reverse order from that in which they were made, bringing them back in this order, to their place of origin, Speech. Collateral. — Test, definition, ^' poles:" points of related contrast on a line of action, which where they act (exchange their contrast on that line) create the square, and where .they react (assert their contrast on that line) create the circle ; where is the center, except in the poles, the idea of the poles, as center divickd? Oh, Professsor, that is what we had. Te. I know, Minnie, and coming now from you they may take what they did not want to take or took in a way that requires an oiling — ^when coming Irom me. It is coal oil from our Penmgrl- vania mines, of thought and science. It will enable them, first to lubricate their jaws, this as a first phase, to move their jaws as a second, to close them or say something as a third, and make me hear something as a fourth and final. The first two would be seen on them, the last two would be seen and felt by us. Now give it to them for a second reading, whilst we leave — Steph. It will be too dark for them to read liie paper. Te. It carries its own light, as a part of the light of the car, — And now we are off, and might face the great Luminaries, of the papers, across the sea, that hang like ignus fatui over the pool of the present, if we had the handle and not the hroom, and there is but one column yet that is firm, though it stands on crutches, and by the time this is printed and read, it may be gone, and when it is gone, the whole country will bend over it in grief and col- lapse— for he was "as one in suffering aU, that suffers nothing," "a man that fortune's buffets and rewards hath ta'en with equal thanks," and trust in duty was the sky of his soul, and as with Grant, so it was with Lincoln, and this was the greatness of their souls inborn, and so we cannot replace them, for they were reared in times when a great sorrow hung yet over the country, and this kept their minds sober, and nobody knew where it would burst, and all that man could do they knew was, trust in God and trust in one's duty, and this trust was that sky of their soul, and it was rewarded, whilst the sky of those that are reared in prosperity is a parlor papered with greenbacks, and yet this system seems the only thing yet needed by progress to complete its lines. And I will cable it into their heads as the latest "quotations" from the " clbaring house" op science, and make it click around them that from the sound they shall think it is a kind of Jews' Exchange, held at the Worlds' Croat-roads, in open markets, whilst it is a Thuwder-storm of the Holt Ghost coming down in modern Methods) and I will argue with them, like Krupp's Hammer, until from the jelly of their points, they shall cry out : Save the classic, sand their trains of thought, by new methods of teaching the dassics, you save the schools as seats of lewrning, and with this, your own methods of life and liberty ! For in all other studies we are led to facts, by mind, Irut away from the main fact, mind itself, whilst n language, literature and art, mind leads back to mind, forming angles of sur- 47— • vey and rest. And in all other studies the thing you study is always seen as one thing : there is but one Arithmetic, one Geography, one Astronomy, though there are methods of treating that one thing, whilst in language you see that one thing, language, as many things of the same kind, languages, compelling to com- ' PARE. And if Lord God spoke, and speaks, to us in three Languages, through Hebrew as Father, through Greek as Son, and here, as Holy Ghost, in English, why deprive those who may wish to learn, of the enlargement of mind following from the study of languages as with every new language a new mind comes be- fore us, and compel us to remain boors and babies in matters of mind, thinking every other boor and baby must just look like us until diiferentiation— noticing of difference, cliildren— rin this, is a first step to culture. And all what mind does now, it does as slave of the body, making it more lazy, whether inventing a spring-bed, or a parlor-car, or a telephone, these short-cuts, of means, ordering a sample of whisky as quickly as a copy of the New Old Testament, but having not the power, nor have they the will to change the whisky in a Testament, for whisky makes it " lively," and lively pats best, and they all without exception follow what pays best, and so work us downward instead of upward— whilst from those angles and nooks and corners of rest, of lihguistic studies, and art and literature, there spring the monarchs of the world of mind, great souls, great architects of new structures of mind, of new creeds, that house the millions in their agonies op soui. when they are bewitched by the wiles op the CaEUISTS AND BEWILDERED BY THE FREAKS OP THE PHYSICISTS — and hoW ridiculous, how utterly ridiculous, to boast of wastes, that is, efforts on lines where, at the \ies% we cannot equal a daisy or the chemistry op tee fields, and neglecting those things in which we can rival an angel, and we should stand at tlie head of creation ! not trying to catch its taili! and all we do catch of it now are mostly gew-giiws, of imitations, as tinsels of feathers, in caps of vanity, — and from these angles of rest spring the liberators of countries that break chains, and do not forge them, by raising issues on the conditions of the "tails of insects," to mislead the masses as to their own eondition, the discoverers of Xew Worlds, new homes, new havens for the Millions, of new means for them TO LIVE when given up by the rest, the proud egotists and "Knights of Matter," and so of ' 'Darkness' ' and this even if they were stockholders in an ' 'Electric Com- pany " — and Grant's mistakes in persons were mistakes not of his but of defects on just that line of want of practice, of mind with mind, and he was a brave man who spoke freely on matters of education also on his own behalf, in his messages — ^and which, all the rest of these proud "experts" and monks of science which want to hide the open light of revelation, as freedom, and the rights of man, and common sense under the "masteries" of a craft — called " microscope"^the Better to beguile, and claim to lead the age, by their own processes and the mode op handling them will only speed the processes which will eat up the Millions, ■ both body and soul, if not checked themselves by a thunderbolt prom HEAVEN that will THROW them back to the abeof knowledge, compelling them to learn their lessons over again, in a different light— and this admixture of light and even if it were only a drop, into the processes of the age may change the character of the whole "com,pou7id" — as a drop of blood shed at the cross- roads of Times, and absorbed into the consciences of the times, has changed, redeemed the blood op all times— and by precipitating— "seMKwfir," children- boast and barbarism, in our present "culture" and "civilization" may save culture and civilization— and men will spring from these angles of culture a .d rest that see not alone themselves and their own lines, but other lines, too, and the texture made from all and will strive to make that texture— very unlike, in this, to those wild one-horse-line men of energy who see nothing but themselves, whose works are vast, and fast, but whose errors are just as vast, and fast, and killing— aai this System will give peace to your souls, children, and everywhere from its certainties— And here is Paris — and here we will drop a rose — to the grandchild of the man that sent that message— Victor Hugo— here is the copy— let your sisters read it, at home^— the only lines here, as to French save some from Harvard : that the " excellent preparation enabled him (the writer) to take it easy for some time waiting for the class to catch up" — and the whole, "preparation," were four lessons : " Paris, le 20 Fdvrier, 1882. Monsieur, M. Victor Hugo a re^u votre travail sur les verbes fran^ais et me charge de vous adresser ses remerciements et ses felicitations. II vous est tr6s reconnaissant des sentiments que vous lui exprimez et sa sympathie vous est entifire- ment acquise. Croyez a mes meilleurs sentiments, Richard Lesclide. " Monsieur Ch. Schaeffer, 125 N. 17th St.,, Philadelphia, U. S. A." m'L Who is Victor Hugo ? Te. Who was, Willie. He is dead. WiV. Who was Victor Hugo ? Te. Who is, Willie ; for he lives ! A writer and poet of France ; a baby, as man, in character, and the rugged^ cliff that projects its preci- pices into the sea, representing at once its fury and its collapse ; a riddle, as a bundle of giants fighting themselves and the whole world ; the throb of the heart of a Titan (if you ever heard of these, strong men that stormed the heavens) under the mountain, with the mountain's that weighs on him; the fragrance of the prairie, with the hiss and the rush of the lava that devours it, singing in this its own pain; the eruption, too, with its thunder and smoke; the man of Europe that had a soul — for Freedom ! Wti. Three cheers — for him — for his memory. Te. Three guns of mourning. The ship of state of Freedom, as Europe, plunged with his death, head foremost, into the sea. Let it lie, as ship, at the bottom, and float its flag in the breeze. Three times three guns, of mourning ! Now drop the rose. They will find it in Europe and deliver it with the "care of" that last line, as address. But hasten — otherwise the rose might be miscarried as to its address, this time, and from a mistake, perhaps, of the carrier, in reading — if dropped here — near the Delaware — where — we land — Min. Oh, Professor, why did you ask us at the beginning of our lessons whether we could read and write? Didn't you know we could ? Te. I asked you to show that your age itself would be no obstacle to take up these things with you, and so would the same age not be in the case of others, provided they or you knew how to read and write, just as, knowing that Willie would ask the question when it came to the point of four classes of verbs in French against seeming only one in English, and having had to prepare the balloon for the survey of the Endings, I kept and held it ready to let it fly, at once. And now, children, don't forgetthe "Broad Avenue," of the Endings of the Present Infinitive, that here divides the Verbs. FOURTH SESSION. Study on Stem Changes. Regular and Irregular Verbs. Straight and Jumping Changes. The Fight. Te. Now, children, there is another difference in the verbs which you, perhaps, have noticed, or if you have not, you could have noticed easily. This is in the kind or character of the stem changes as to the place where they occur with the word. If I say, examine your stem changes, that is the change you wrote in your copy books, can you see any difference as to the point or place of change? Nell. Some have the change outside. Te. Which do you see? Nell. Aim-er, Fin-ir, they have outside an e and i. Te. Examine others, compare them with the form of the stem in the Inf. Wil. Voul oir has a change of the word, the stem. Te. How? Wil. The Inf. has voul- and the Fut. stem change is voud-. Anna. I see half a dozen. Te. Give them, or some of them. Anna. V-oir has only a v- as stem, and the Fut. has ver- , ven-ir has a change altogether, changes • the ven- into viend. Beulah Dee. Av-oir changes into au. Sieph. Et-re into se. Min. Val-oir changes into vaud. Wil. Some have no change. Te. Give some. Wil. Dev-oir has no change. Anna. Vend-re has no change. Steph. Trai-re has no change. Te. They may possibly have changes of the stem in other tenses or forms. Now mind, children, verbs which make the stem changes outside, by an addition to the stem as it is in the Inf , we call regular verbs, and their stem changes are the stem changes of all verbs of that class. Verbs which make the stem changes by changing the word itself, the stem of the Inf., are called the irregular verbs, and the kind of changes, as it is a change of the verb, is a question more or less with the verb itself. They all are running, each, a ticket of its own ; they are bolters, whilst the regular verbs follow the regular ticket of the change of the Conjugation to which they belong, without a scratch. But examine closely vSt-ir. Min. That has an outside change, it adds the i. Te. This, then,, would not make it an irregular verb, but it has another important change ^ in the Past Participle or Perfect Participle, children, which constitutes it an irregular verb. It is the ending of the Perf. Participle that sometimes too, determines whether a verb is regular or irregular, even if there should be no change of the stem either in the Past Participle or elsewhere in the verb. Verbs of our lists or cut, that are understood to be irregular, though they — 49 — — 50 — show no stem change in the Future tense which we treated, are made irreg- ular from changes in other tenses. Verbs called or enumerated as irregular, must have somewhere a change which deflects from the regular form, as stem, or ending of Perf. Participle, or they would be regular. There are some verbs of the first class, or conjugation, that also soipe- what change the stem by doubling a letter, or changing an accent or taking one, where before they had none, but this is rather a matter of " euphony" in cases where the former simple letter comes before a letter, an . To our lessons. I see already the badge, it stands out before me in all colors of the rainbow. Min. That is a most wonderful badge. Is it a diamond? Te. Much more precious than all the diamonds of the world. If sold for its worth, it could bring more than all the diamonds of the world if sold, could buy of life, liberty and independence for schools. Ch. Then let us go ahead, quickly, to get that badge. Te. We are getting to it now. But there is another feiture connected with these stem changes, and in which all verbs share equally, whether they are regular or irregular; namely, whether the stem changes are straight changes or crooked, jumping changes. The straight changes go straight through a tense, as we saw in the Future; the aim-e- of the stem as stem change, was the same change for all the persons, so the vaud-, ver-, se-, au-, etc. The crooked or jumping changes, jump from one place, tense or mood, person or number, into another, or are at some pla es straight and in others crooked. I will first chalk off their race or jumping ground, as tenses, moods, etc., giving the E iglish for these tenses and moods too, and then choosing signs, mark the places where alwavs the .same kind of change jumps to ; the same kind of sign, meaning always the same kind of change in a verb for the places. And as all verbs jump the same way, when you afterwards see one of the signs with a stem change on our charts, and you know that that one sign means all the places that have the same sign on the square for that change, would you not know, easily, where to apply that change, namely, to all the places having that sign on the square f Ch \ thmk we would. Te. Now the tenses or moods that belong to the square are with their English, as follows: — Present Participle {E.\\^\%\\, . . . ing, loving;) /mfierfect /mlicative (English, I loved, I sang;) Present Indicative (I love, I sing;) Imperative (love thou, sing,) and Present Subjunctive (I may love, sing.) The signs we use are star (X), ring (0)» and square (□). Now I will draw the square and put in the signs (drawing.) I abbreviate the names of the tenses in English, so that it will not take so much room. — 52 — Pres. Pakt. X Imp'f. Ind. Present Ind. Impekat. SUBJ. Sing. I,. . X o — ' D 2, . X o o D 3, • • • X o D n PI. I, . . . X X X X 2, . . . X X X X 3. • • X n D □ Tell me all the forms that have the star (X) change; tell me all the places that have the ring (O) change ; tell me all the places that have the square (□) change. How many stars? Ch. One, two, three— thirteen. Te. How many rings? Ch. Four. Te. How many squares? Ch. One, two — seven. Te. The change at one of the places must be the change for all the places having the same sign, and if one, that first star, was '' Wana- maker," what would be all the other stars? Ch. Wanamaker ! Te. And if one ring change was "Strawbridge," what would be all the other rings? Ch. Strawbridge ! Te. And if one of the squares was " Cooper and Conard," what would be all the other squares? Ch. Cooper and Conard! School- marm, Assistant (perhaps from Boston). That makes it local. Te. Like the Public Ledger and the Pennsylvania Rail Road ; they annex the rest — we are not in Boston, as they said when I was in Boston we were not in Chicago; therethe ten lessons might do, but in Boston they would "see." Anita. Well, but what did they do ? Did they see ? Te. Of course, they saw. Anita. What did they then do ? Te. Nothing, but invite me to read them — something. Anita. And when they had heard it, what did they then do? Te. Again, nothing. Anita. That is very local. Te. And we have to annex them to make them general, in their locality ; if we could make them general, in their locality in Philadelphia, that would be just the thing for us and for them, we would get local and they would get general ; that is just now the trouble with us, we are no place now, only a reflex of places, of all places, in heaven and earth, and they are a reflex on all places everywhere. It would be like a consolidation of the universe, to combine Boston and Philadelphia. But we never could get local from "Wanamaker" & "Co.," for they are general, and as long as we have Independence Hall — "we" means the rest. But, children, it is not necessary or understood that all verbs have all these changes at the same time. Some have only one, others two, others have all three, others none, but whenever there is a change, that change comes back, recurs, children, at the same places, and this in regular and irregular verbs. A few single words, in ordinary verbs — the auxiliaries ■ —53 — are very irregular at these places — fall off from the order of this line, then I give the deflection from the rule of change, on the chart with the change. But all this was the reason that no one thought there was a law at the bottom of this change, it was so covered up by the variety of its action. But now where it is known, it is all plain enough. Now write out the changes of this square in the forms of " Wanama- ker," star (x)j "Strawbridge," ring (0)j "Cooper and Conard," square (Q). Shorten the words and instead of Cooper and Conard, say only "Conard." Draw your lines and put names of tenses in columns; keep the Present Participle out of the line of the persons, ist pers. sing. The first form of Imperat. is blank (dash). Ch. (Drawing.) Pres. Part. Wan Imperf. Ind. Pres. Ind. Imperat. SUBJ. Sing. I, Wan Strawbr Con 2, Wan Strawbr Strawbr Con 3. Wan Strawbr Con Con PI. I, Wan Wan Wan Wan 2, Wan Wan Wan Wan » 3. Wan Con Con Con Te. Now change this into a verb. Suppose here is boi-re, to drink, from your chart irregular verbs; see it, in your charts, the verb's are arranged alphabetically. The stem changes belonging to this square, you see, are star change (X), buv- ; the square change (□) boiv-. The ordinary stem is'boi-. Wherever there is no change given for a place, you use the ordinary stem. Underline the star changes, and put the ordinary stem in capitals. It will show better. Ch. (Writing.) — 54 — Pres. Part. X buv- Imperf, Ind. Pres. Ind. Impekat. SUBJ. Sing. I, X buv- O Boi- Q boiv- 2> X buv- O Boi- O Boi- □ boiv. 3. X buv- O Boi- Q.boiv- Q boiv- PI. I, X '^«z'- X buv- X bup- X ^«»- 2. X i^'^'- X buv- X hiiv- X buv- 3. X buv- Q boiv- □ boiv- Q boiv- 7>. Now take another verb: Prend-re, to take, look into your charts. It happens to have the same kind of changes as this boi-re (star and square, no ring change.) I had better write it on the board, too — Q prenn- prend-re (X pren-) What are the changes? Ch. It has a star change, X pren-; a square change, □ prenn-; no ring change ; the ordinary stem is prend-. Te. Now what are all the thirteen star changes? Ch Pren-. Te. The seven square changes? Ch. Prenn-. Te. The rest, or the form in the place of the ring changes? Ch. Prend-. Te. Willie, give first person plural. Present Subj. Wil. Of course that must be pren-, all the first and second plurals are stars, pren-. Te. Anita, give 3d plural, Pres. Ind ? Anita. That is square, it must be prenn-. Te. Nellie, give 3d sing. Imperat.? Nellie. That is square, it must be prenn-. Te. Anna, give 2d sing. Imperat.? Anna. That is no change, stem— -prend-. Te. Willie, give all the stem changes of this verb in Pres. Imperat., slowly? Wil. Sing. — 'blank, =prend, ''prenn-. Plur.— 'pren-, =pren-, ^prenn-. Te. Anna, give Pres. Ind., Sing, and Plur., stem changes, slowly — spell it ? An. Prend-, prend-, prend-, pren-, pren-, prenn-. Te. Present Participle. Wil. Of course, pren-. Te. Why, Willie, again, of course? Wil. The Pres. Part, is a star change, and prend-re has a star change, and that is pren-. Te. Now, another verb; take mouv-oir, to move, children, see your charts. Here is the verb and its changes : O meu- Q meuv- MOUV-oir (to move.) What stem change of this square do you not see there? Ch. It has no star change. Te. Then, in those places of the stars you take, as you are not — 55 — ordered to change, what? Ch. The ordinary stem. Te. What is that? Ch. Mouv-. Te. Children, slowly now, what is the second plur., Pres. Subj.? Anita, Nellie. Mouv-. Te. Why? An. The first and second plural throughout are star or Wanamaker changes, which that verb has not, so it is here, noouv-, its ordinary stem. Te. What is third sing., Imperat. ? Nell. That is meuv- Te. Why? Nell. That place is a square place, and the square change here is, meuv-, so the change is here, meuv-. Te. Third sing., Pres. Ind., what is that? Ch. That is "ring" (looking at diagram of mouv-oir) that is meu-. Te. And Pres. Part. Ch. No change, mouv-. Te. Now, another verb. Take v-oir, to see. See your charts. Anita, write the verb with the stem changes that belong here, on the board. An. (Writing). O voi- Q voi- V-oir (X voy-) Te. What will be first plural, Pres. Subj.? Ch. All first and second plural, star changes, voy-. Te. Third sing., Pres. Ind. and Subj. Ch. Ring and square, it is here the same change for both, ring and square, voi-. Te. Now, once more. How many star places are on this square? Ch. Thirteen. 7>. How many ring places? Ch.Yoxa. 7>. How many square places? Ch. Seven. Te. But how many changes do I need to give or do you need to learn, for each of these kinds of changes, to have all the others of the same kind? Ch. Only one. Te. And so, three notations, one for each kind of changes, will cover how many changes? Ch. (Counting) twenty- four. Te. And if a word, or as I may add here, words, fall out of the line of the rule of changes, where is this noted ? Ch. With the change. Te. Now write the word All-er, in these changes from your chart. Observe : If a number of words or letters are given in succession in the place of a change with the verb, then this succession as such, if nothing else is said, means the persons of that place in their order. Any notation given with a place, of course, means only that place. And if no dash is given anywhere on the charts after a word, or rather the letters of a word, then the form as you see it, means always a full form. Now, Stephen, copy on the board what you see of the verb and such changes on your charts. Steph. (Copying). O Vais, vas, va Q aill — 3d plur. 2 Imperat, va Pres. Ind., vont. i- All-er Te. Write now the Wanamaker square in all-er, children, one of the worst verbs in French. What kind of change do you not see noted. Ch. It has no star change. Te. And what, therefore, do you take in the places of the star? Ch. The ordinary stem. Te. Draw your lines first and then fill out. Ch., (Drawing and writing.) Will. I am already done. Te. -56- How so quick ? Will. I wrote all the changes of a kind at once, at a time ; all thtaJ-'s, and then all the aill-'s, with that one exception, and then the vais, vas, va, etc. That goes like lightning, and you can hardly miss a thing or form, everything is absolute, sure. Te. That is good, that helps a great deal. Read me your Imperative — spell it out. IVill. Blank, va-, aill-; plur.— all-, all-, aill-, that way it is much more difficult to write quickly; it is sure too, but one has to go slower. Te. But do you use the verb this way, all five or six forms at a time, in speech? Anna. Only one at a time. Te. Now see, Willie, whether you do not know it that way. What is third plur., Pres. Subj. of all-er? Will. O, that I am sure, it is aill-. Te. Why? Will. It is "square," and that is aill-. Te. And the third sing., Imperat. Will. Oh, that is nothing, it is square, that is aill-, too. Te. And the first plur., Imperf. Will. All first and second plur. are star changes, it has none, it is all-. Te. 'And the third sing., Pres. Ind. Look at ydur writing. Will. Oh, I know it, that is va. Te. And children, you are done, I suppose, by this time; third plur., Pres. Ind. — don't look at your books. Ch. Vont ! this time, extra. Te. Good. Show me now your books. Ck. (Showing.) Prbs. Pakt. all- Impekf. Ind. Prbsent-Ind. Impbkat. Sunj. Sing, i., all- vais aill- 2, all- vas va aill- 3. all- va aill- aiU- PL i; all- all- all- all- 2, all- all- all- all- 3' all- vont aiU- aill- Te. The pronouns, you see, we leave away again in our writings. We know them from their use with the Future. And the forms that have no dash here, what are they as such forms, given without a dash and understood to be as such ? Ch. Full forms. Te. Tell me the forms given as full forms here, of this square. Ch. Vais, vas, va, va, vont. Te. Now, children, what have you to know or to learn in order to use this square with verbs? Ch. We have to know the rules of this square and stem changes as they are given with the verbs, ring, square or star, or where there is not one, of these changes, then we have to use the ordinary stem, and this, then, with its — 57 — ending and meaning in English. Te. But suppose you would not learn these stem changes with us, one square, one ring, one star, would that help you anything with the verb ? Ch. We would have to learn them with the verbs, and instead of one star change, we would have to learn thirteen, and instead of one square, sevep, etc. Anna. And then we would not know where they come in. Te. It would be a mere matter of memory to know when or where, and whether a change comes in or not. Here are some colored pencils, run them through your writings in all-er ; all stars or star places, blue ; all squares, yellow ; all rings, red. Ch. O, that looks nice ! Te. Now, whether we say blue change, star change or Wanamaker change, it means the same thing, and so with the square, yellow, and the red, ring ; and if I would write these changes each always on a given place with a verb, the ring change on left upper corner, square change right upper corner, star change after the verb, would that not be as good a notation of the change, its kind, the place it is meant for, as the signs themselves ? Wil. We could leave away all the signs with the stem changes themselves, noting only by place. Te. So it is noted on the very large printed chart of the irregular verbs, such as Victor Hugo had it, of which your copy is a photograph, photo-lithograph, with the colors maintained. On "our large Chart" of the regular verbs and the auxiliaries, you see the signs left away with the auxiliaries, their stem changes being noted only by position and color. These changes in the auxiliaries are so numerous that ihese changes, of the Wanamaker or color and sign square in the auxiliaries, you learn better ready made, in their order of persons and tenses, from an extra chart. The other forms of the auxiliaries are as straight for learning from our large chart as the rest of the verbs on that chart. And what do we learn from this Wana- maker square, and the notation of the stem changes of this square with the verbs? have we anything to do with the endings or spelling, except in cases of a special irregularity, as a full form like vais or vont, where we get stem ending and spelling at once? Ch. Only the stem changes. Te. The end- ings and spelling we get separate — from this, our large chart ; we made already a beginning with the Future ; what was the ending of all Futures ? Ch. -rai. Te. And what was the place where we noted the stem change of the Future? Ch. " Immediately above the verb. " Te. Now look at your all-er as you wrote it, or as Stephen wrote it on the board. What is the Future of all-er? Ch. I-rai. Te. Give me that Future in full, read it from the chart; the r is given but once, with the first person. The spelling you know from your writing. Ch. Irai, iras, ira, irons, irez, iront. Te. Write this on the board, Anna, mark the pieces, stem, ending and spelling, where there is any. Anna (writing on board): i-rai, i-ra-s, i-ra, i-ron-s, i-re-z, i-ron-t. Te. And what do these mean? Ch. I shall go, thou wilt go. Te. All right, but where is the I, thou, in French ? Ch. It is not in our answer, but we know it: Je, or before a vowel, j', tu, il, elle, nous, vous, ils, elles. Te. Now, I think, children, that is all very plain, both as to the Future and -58- tbe Wanamaker square. Do you think it would transgress the capacity of any one to learn and comprehend this? Ch. I think not. Te. And yet there are people who say it takes them longer time to learn the rules of that square than to learn the French verb. Wil. How long is the French verb, in the books? Te. Fifty-two pages by the yard stick, in Fasquelle's Gram- mar. Wil. Oh, Professor, I know that square now already, forward, back- ward, up or down. Te. I think you do. And don't you think it is not more than fair and meet to inflict such a terrible punishment on such stub- born ill-will as will last them forever, that is, as long as that stubbornness of ill-will lasts, and frighten evil doers and prevent a recurrence, and not by me, but through the mouth of children ? Ch. I cannot see how they can not see it. Te. Neither can I. They don't want to see it; they are afraid of it, as the tailors- were of the sewing machine, first, when they heard of it, and then when they saw what it did ; or the monks were of printing. Anna. I think that is very foolish. Te. These things have now been before the country in German, Latin, Greek, French, for many years, and yet what is the result of all of it? Nothing b'lt ridicule, disdain, indifference. Think of the agony that has been inflicted only in these years, by all these many times fifty-two pages of verbs alone, in all these different languages, on all the big boys and the small boys, the little girls and the tall girls, on all the young men eager to learn, and all the young women eager to advance, and kept back and embarrahsed in their efforts and blasted in their hopes by the toils needed to disentangle themselves from the coils of the verb alone, not to speak of the other items of the languages ; and so losing interest in their struggles, and when they are through, think they have struggled in vain and lost life for nothing. If it had been a college endowment or increase of salary, the college masters would likely' have seen it, would they not? Anna. I think they would. Te. A teacher who steals his pupil's time is a thief, and worse than a thief, because he steals what has been placed in trust with him, his pupil's time, to whom he holds in this, the matter of time, the relation of guardian, and what when once lost, he can never replace. I wish that the children, with their own mouths, would repeat this statement as their own opinion and as they understand it. All children. A teacher who steals his pupil's time is a thief, and worse than a thief, because he steals what has been placed in trust with him, and he can not replace. Te. And as they say they can not "see" it, is it not fair that we help them to see? Are you ready ? Ch. We are. Te. Then write the square as we had it, but instead of the Wanamaker, Straw bridge and Conard changes, write now the star places, dunces; the ring places, foolscaps; and the square places, ganache. Ch. What is ganache ? Te. Dunces in talk. Have you written it ? Ch. We have. Te. Then read it to me. How does it read ? Ch. (Reading) : 59 — Pres. Part. Imperf. Ind. Present Ind. Imphrat. SUBJ. dunces dunces foolscaps ganache dunces foolscaps foolscaps ganache dunces foolscaps ganache ganache dunces dunces dunces dunces dunces dunces dunces dunces dunces ganache ganache ganache Te. Now change the name of Tenses into those of cities, Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Boston, New York, in this order, and the persons, singular and plural, the single ones or those of the singular into Teachers, Professors, Headmasters, and those of the plural, in their order, into Schools, Colleges, Academies, what will you get ? Ch. (Writing). Washington. Baltimore, Philadelphia. Boston. New Vork. dunces Teachers dunces foolscaps ganache Professors, dunces foolscaps foolscaps ganache Headmasters dunces foolscaps ganache ganache Schools dunces dunces dunces dunces Colleges dunces dunces dunces dunces Academies dunces ganache ganache ganache Te. Now what are, from the diagram, the teachers of Boston ? Ch, Blank. Te. The professors of Baltimore? Ch. Dunces. Te. The pro- fessors of Philadelphia? Ch. Foolscaps. Te. The headmasters of New York? C4. Ganache. /"(t. The headmasters of Philadelphia ? C/?. Fools- caps. Te. The academies of New York? Ch. Ganache. Te. The acade- mies of Baltimore? Ch. Dunces. Te. The colleges of New York? Ch. Dunces. Te. The colleges of Baltimore and New York ? Ch. Dunces. Te. The colleges of all the cities? Ch. Dunces. Te. They, the "colleges," are first person plural, that goes all through as same change; and the schools of all the cities? Ch. Same way, dunces. Te. Dunces, all around, and the teachers of all the cities? Ch. Some are dunces, some are foolscaps, some are blank, some are ganache. Te. And the head, in front of all, at Washington? Ch. We don't see any. Te. But suppose there was one, what would it be as the head of stars here? Ch. The head of dunces. Te, That may suffice — now back to our Tenses. But suppose they would mend and change, would they not be pearls, jewels, darlings ? Now, if I give you one "star" as pearls, what will be all the stars? ' Ch. Pearls. Te. And' if I give you one "square" as darlings, what will be all the squares? Ch, Darlings. Te. And if I give you one "ring" as jewels, what will be all the rings here? Ch. Jewels. Te. Write out this square with the changes, stars, pearls ; rings, jewels ; and squares, darlings ; let the dunces become "pearls," ^& foolscaps, "jewels," and the ganache, "darlings," what do- you get ? Ch. (Writing). ■6o — pearls ALTIMORE. Philadelphia. Boston. New York pearls jewels darlings pearls jewels jewels darlings pearls jewels darlings darlings pearls- pearls pearls pearls pearls pearls pearls pearls pearls darlings darlings darlings Teachers Professors Headmasters Schools Colleges Academies Te. What will now the professors of Baltimore be ? Ch. Pearls. Te. And the professors of Boston ? Ch. Jewels. Te. And the teachers of New York? Ch. Darlings. Te. And the teachers of Philadelphia? Ch. Jewels. Te. What they are — because they are going to mend and have already mended to some extent — and the schools of New York ? Ch. Pearls. Te. And all the teachers? Ch. Some are pearls, some are jewels, some are darlings, except Boston. Te. Why? Ch. They are "blank." Te. Now change the stars into darlings, and the rings into pearls, and the squares into jewels, what will now all the schools be? Will. Oh, I can say it without writing. Te. Why? Wil. The schools are first person plural, and these are now all stars, darlings. Te. And the teachers, first person singular? Ch. Some are darlings, some are pearls, some are jewels, except Boston. Te. Why? Some children. They are blank. Little girl. Why are all the Boston teachers always b'ank? Nellie. Because they are Boston teachers. Anita. But why, then, are they, as Boston teachers, always blank? Wil. Don't you see^-as teachers they are the first person, and Boston is in the Imperative Mood, so they, as Boston teachers, are blank. Te. They are singular, first person, and can not command themselves ; and as they can not, of course, command anybody else in that mood in which Boston is, they are blank. The teachers in the other working moods, as first persons, are not blank. Ch. Are you not a teacher yourself. Professor? Te. No. Ch. What are you then. Professor ? Te. I am a grandfather, one of your uncle's, Sam. Ch. Uncle Sam? Te. "Uncle Sam" is everybody and everywhere where any good is being done for the country. Ch. Then you must have many grandchildren ? Te. So I have, and some nephews, here and abroad, and it is for them that we inflect the "dunces." Wil. That shows the action of the square. Te. To all pearls, jewels and dunces. But now, children, take all the teachers, and professors, and schools, and pearls, and jewels, and dar- lings, and dunces, and foolscaps, and Wanamaker's, and Strawbridge's, and Cooper and Conard's, and "buv's," and "boiv's," and "prend's," and ■"pren's," and "prenn's," and the endings, and the spellings, and multiply each single set of stem changes to the number of hundreds of verbs, and put them in a hat and shake it, and put a schoolmarm on one side and the children on the other, and toss the hat and draw answers, and tears, and — 6i — Te. And there is that other method that wants to learn "like a child," and a child learns ten thousand lessons, ten lessons a day for all the days of three years ; and then it knows nothing but the sounds, and no spelling, and read- ing, and writing, and they want to do this in twenty lessons, and this with pupils that have the heads full of other things than learning, and are as far from the conditions of a child as memory, and attention, and absorption of what it sees and hears, as the moon is from the earth, and yet they want to do it without the conditions, and play bootblack to a lazy times that wants to know but not to learn and is too lazy to think even what it requires to learn like a child, and think they are children when they spend money for the fun of the thing — of a few phrases or a summer time spent in pleasure — and when they have learned nothing, except they knew what they did learn not like a child — in that case they would learn with profit, and it would be just the thing for them, but otherwise such talk makes wind, but gives no knowledge, and when left alone, they are; helpless like children with their own texts they can not read, though they talk them — still they think there is the show of something, the phrase, and nobody knows how much or how little is behind it, and it sounds, as phrase, correct ; not even they in their innocence of pleasure know, for they never saw, that is heard, the language, only so much of it as the professor shows by his gestures ; whilst with us, in its full force, at once stands out before the pupil the language, but with means, too, to master it in this, its force, without a master, and be brought by ten lessons of such work as green students, to college. You don't expect me, children, to stand back and hang the head and be bashful, because they, the public, don't want to see it ; we sail in rather and blow the trumpet, and blow the trumpet, and blow the trumpet, till they have to hear it and the walls of "Jericho" go down. My students can never make a "show" of the ordinary kind, the deeper the seed is laid the less they can make that show of surface, but the harvest is secured, or they make such shows, if you will call these shows, as we had them the other day at five Commencements with green classes, that had had, each, sixteen lessons, divided between Ger- man and French; when I walked with a copy of Tel6maque into the class- room and made them read, parse, translate, with the help of a few words given, and then say by heart and sometimes write by heart, too, the first sentence, five or six lines, as much as there may be written on a blackboard, of any one page of three hundred pages they might give and which they gave from book, and they did it correctly, and one of the classes was in the Phila- delphia School of Design, if any one wants to ask ; and here, children, you have the whole of the verb from top to bottom, and when you are through, nobody can teach you anything more of the verb than what you can do yourself by practice. And it is important to free the student as quickly as we can in these times of hurry and change from the lead-string of the teacher, and to throw him upon himself — and this is with many a question, too,, of money, at least of time — and what you save at one point you can use at — 62 — another ; and so, though getting away from our square, we are getting back to it, as a means of saving time. And they stand out, these squares, in the different languages like electric lights along the roads, cheering the pupil in his efforts and shortening the work of the teacher, doing the trudgery as by electricity or steam, and freeing the soul to soar up into the beauties of the thing, the reading and talking and take rambles, too, after things — bal- loons, children, we did that in time saved, whilst saving new time by the balloon — and to come to these, the reading and talking, in almost no time, not by understanding, but with understanding, and that is all the difference. The talking as such must be learned by talk, but understanding must be secured, too, if you have not time to learn only like a parrot ; and this understanding is sped and laid deep by this kind of work. And so led and aided by similar kinds of works over the whole of the grounds, the student can say that he knows a language as far as knowing is based on a hold on its principles, and the rest presses on with this knowledge, and the certainty, .and the satisfaction, and the love of the thing as kind of work and kind of study, — but then, children, in this square, after the changes of this square, there come the "endings" and the "spelling," too. Wil. O, that is noth- ing, I see it from the chart, and the more comes here the more comes else- where, too, in books, and we had to get it there. Te. It is not much here. Wil. Professor, does that square not look like a ladies' shopping bill or memo- irandum book? One day they go only to Wanamaker's, another to Wana- maker, and Strawbridge and Clothier, or Strawbridge and Clothier, and •Cooper and Conard, and then on other days, they may coaimence with Strawbridge and Clothier, and then go to Wanamaker, and bring up with Cooper and Conard. Te. And on days where there is no change, then the square looks like a day spent at Cook's, by ladies, buying underwear ; but ■on dry-good-days, they do like the square. That is the reason they take so amazingly to it. The next step, children, in the system, is the annexation •of Boston. Not to take when seeing, invites taking. And so they are ^' taken'' from to- day ; and once they belonging to us, we shall easily belong ito them, and they, from their practice, will "see it." Now write for the next time, to keep you busy, the Future of the first six verbs in large print, on your chart of irregular verbs, and take a wilk in the "square." It looks like France — variety and unity, diversity and rule- that is beauty, that is France: Le Jardin de Versailles, the "Garden of Versailles," Versailles, near Paris, children, as I call it on your chart, meaning the principle of French gardening seen as applied by language to itself. Some ask: What has that word to do here? O nothing, for you, grave heads, only to please the children. It pleased one grandchild, I know, and it will please one more, and others, when they are grown up. FIFTH SESSION. The Tenses of all Verbs, Simple and Compound, in full. The Verb Com- pleted. The Children's Rewards. Copies of Chart. Te. Now children, we can now finish the verb in "no time." But first, show me your Futures ? Ch. (Showing). Te. Now read them, spell the words, I will sound them and you say it again ; give only the French for the pronunciation. Ch. (Reading") absoud-rai, achet-e-rai, atquerrai, i-rai, amen-e-rai, amoncell e-rai. Te. You see, some take accent or double letter in the Future, verbs of the first Conjug As to these, you con- sult afterwards, list in books, I gave some of each kind. You will see that the same feature of accent and doubling, in these same verbs, is also in their red and yellow stems. It is cauied by the spelling — this in the ordinary English sense— of these forms. Now, PRESENT PARTICIPLE ; enling—^wA. it, Willie, Pr. P., on chart. Wil. and other children. I see it, we see it — ant. Te. Full form, the t is spelling and is not heard. Stem cnange, if occurring (Pres. Part., is one of the forms of the Wanamaker square) what? Cn. Star. Te. N(jw read me the Pres. Part, in your four- teen verbs; the four regular verbs and the two Aux. on "our large chart," and the eight on your cut, or from the chart of the irregular verbs. Read, each child, three, as far as it goes, say it, \yhen you come upon a stem change. Ch. (Reading) aim-ant, (stem change) fin-iss-ant, dev-ant, vend- ant, 'Stem change) ay-ant, (stem change, in accent) et ant, voul ant, (stem change) voy ant, viv-ant, vSt ant, ven-ant, val-ant, (stem change) vairqu- ant, (stem change) tray-ant. They all mean in English . . . ing, loving, finishing, etc., as you know from the notation of the meaning of the Pres. Part., when it was given as one of the forms of the Wanamaker square. New Tense, IMPERFECT (Past) INDICATIVE; ending under the "Im. I.," of the chart, on top. Stephen read it, with "spelling." Steph. Sing., ai-. Te. With the "spelling" Steph. Ai s, ai-s, ai-t. Plur., ion s, ie-z, ai-ent. Te. Stem change, Anna? Anna. Star; it is one of the Wanamaker square. Te. Stem change the same as Pres. Part., only in the auxiliary avoir, there is a deflection. We take these auxiliaries in the Imperf., as we did in the Pres. Part., from our large chart, though for the square at large in these Aux's, you have an extra chart. Give Imperf Ind. in the 14 verbs, children ; take each three again, changing your turn ; only first -63- -64- person— the stem change of the Imperf. Ind. is one of i\ie Jumping changes, but in the Imperf. Ind. itself, as you have noticed on your squares, it is straight, there is no break. Where is a change of stem in one of your verbs, mark it again, but now, by saying only, change, we know it means, stem change. Ck. (Reading) aim-ai-s, (change) fin-iss-ai-s, dev ai-s, vend-ai-s, (change ay-, but it is said : Imperf. Ind. regular, so, av-) av-ai-s, (change of accent again) et-ai-s, voul-ai-s, (change) voy-ai-s, viv-ai-s, v&t-ai-s, ven-ai-s, val-ai-s, (change) vainqu-ai-s, (change) tray-ai-s. Te. Next Tense or Mood, CONDITIONAL; ending — "r" of the Future, with ending of Imperf. Ind., with the spelling: r-ai-s, first form in left upper corner. Stem Change ! Who can see where there is the notation that directs a stem change as for the Conditionali Nell. I see it in Key I., under the gold line. "S'M" means stem; a line above this means Future and Conditional; so its stem change is noted above the verb, and is that of the Future. Te. Read the verbs — note again where change occurs. Ch. (Reading): (change) aim-e-rai-s, (change) fin-i-rai-s, dev-rai-s, vend-rai-s, (change) au-rai-s, (change) se-rai-s, (change) voud-rai-s, (change) ver-rai-s, viv-rai-s, (change) v6t-i-rai-s, (change) viend-rai-s, (change) vaud-rai-s, vainc-rai-s, trai-rai-s. Te. The stem change, you see, is throughout that of the Future. Ch. Has that Conditional anything to do with the Future, that it is here again, the r of the Future? Te. The Conditional, "I would, if," is a suspense between the Future and the Past in meaning; put in the "if" and the Past is a Future, that is, it is not done what you talk about; take away the "if," and the Future would be a Past, it would be done or was already done. So you can not forget now its forms, ending proper, of Imperf. Ind, and helping letter r as of the Future. Wil. I think I can never forget that Conditional, a suspense, in letters. Te. Give me Conditional of etre, without the book? Wil. Se-rai-s. Te. Third plural. Conditional, v-oir; spell it. Nellie. Ver-r.ai-ent. Jir. Why did you put that dot in? Nellie. To mark that "suspense" as you called it, to show that it is made of a part of the Future and in part of the Imperfect. Te. And what is its meaning as Conditional ? Ch. I would, if — . Te. I would, should, love, eat, drink. New Tense or form : PERFECT PARTI- CIPLE, where? Buelah Dee. I see it; top line, "P. P.," that means Perf. Participle. Te. Here the classes differ in endings. Read them. Ch. I Conj., e, 2, i, 3 and 4, u. Te. If a stem change occurs, or the form is otherwise irregular, it is noted as you see in Key I., under the verb. Give me Perf. Part, in your fourteen verbs ; if a change occurs, and the form is not straight by the rule of the classes, say again "change." Ch. (Reading) aim-e, fin-i, (ch.) d-u. Te. What is the change here? Ch. It is in the stem ; the u is regular. Te. Inside change of stem, of dev- to d-, this makes it irregular. The verbs of the third conjugation are actually irregular verbs counted, as representing, each, not itself, but a certain class of verbs, with -65- would again confuse other forms, especially the Infinitives of other verbs. In some grammars, the verbs of this third conjugation are left out entirely from the list of regular verbs. The stem of the verb for us here is dev-; next verb, vend-re ; the / under it, in parenthesis, is not or has nothing to do with the Perfect Participle ; it is or refers to the vowel of the Defini, children, the next form we come to. The way to mark a change that means the Defini, children, is given in Key I : you have to see it under the verb in parenthesis, as you see that D, meaning Defini, there. Now we have seen or heard of all the Tenses that are meant by notations, explaining the meaning of stem changes as contained in Key I; what are they? Anna, Nellie. Notation above the verb, immediately, means Future and Conditional ; line below, Perfect Participle, and if a notation is given there at the side, in parenthesis, then it means Defini. Te. Now go on with your verbs, vend-re, Perf. Part.? Ch. (Reading) vend-u, (ch.)eu, (ch.) 6te; voul-u, v-u, (ch.) vec-u; (ch.) vet-u. Te. What is the change here? Ch. Ending, instead of i, — (ch.) same as in vSt-ir, ven-u, val-u; vainc-u, (ch.) trait. Te. The meaning of Perf. Part, is: loved, seen, conquered, finished, as you got the explanation of the Participles before. Now, new form, DEFINI, (Past Definite). What is the Definite ? A side form to the Imperfect. What is the difference ? Children, do you see this pencil (showing the pencil length- wise) ? Now, if you see an act in mind like this pencil as a line, showing a line of occupation or engagement in the past, that is Imperfect, but if (turn- ing the pencil and showing the point) you see an act in mind as a point, showing the kind of occupation as differing from other occupations as this lead-pencil shows its kind of pencil as point, that is the Defini, Past Definite. Now, if you say, I wrote my lesson, showing you at this lesson, and its writing, that is Imperfect; but when you say: I wrote my lesson, meaning either the writing as writing, that you wrote it and did not learn by heart, or that you wrote a lesson and did not play, that is the Defini ; or, we could say it shorter : if you want to describe yourself by a line of action in the past, that is Imperfect ; but when you want to describe the action, that is Defini. And the Perfect Tense is the efl'ect of an action on the Present : I have dined — that is not a description of the dining, but of the effect of a dining on the Present. The Perfect describes an effect; the Imperfect, yourself; the Defini, the action. The Perfect is the end of that line of the pencil, as point of effect, the Imperfect, the line. The Defini, the point only, not as line, but as point only. Now you see what that genius meant with his "definition" of the "Defini." "One, two, three;" he meant the point, but could not say it, because he did not see it, though he might have talked to his pupils for half a year to make them see the point, namely, that neither they saw, nor he either. This is an aid which this system affords, or might afford to the "talkers," to talk to the point, though, it seems, they can not see this point, either. Tih^vix, endings ("D") Minnie? Min. "Defini /- or u-," "s. P. P.," what means "s P P?" Te. "See Perfect — 66 — Participle;'— xl the Perfect Participle is in i, the Defini is i-; if it is in u, the Defini is u- ; if it is not so, the Defini is marked in parenthesis below the verb, back of the place of the Perf. Part., as you saw this in Key I. What is said under the head of the Defini, of the ist Conjugation (" i C.")? Min. It has singular, ai, a-, a. Te. What does this dash after the a- mean ? Wil. That means the spelling of the second person singular. Te. The "a" form continues, with an e, for the i Conjug. in the plural ; now give me endings of Def in full, with the "spelling;" second plural has j- instead of z, as we saw already in the "spelling. ' ' Ch. Do we add the ordinary spelling endings all through ? Te. Yes, you do ; wherever a dash shows the need of a "spelling." Don't forget or overlook the accents in the plural ; the grave accent from the left to the right, makes the sound broad. Ch. Either i-s or, u-s or, in i Conj. ai i-s u-s a-s i-t u-t a i-me-s fl-me-s a-me-s i-te-s u-me-s a-te-s i-r-ent u-r-ent e-r-ent Te. You see the difference in the three columns is only in the vowels, and the absence in the spelling of the " a " form, of the s and t in the first and third singular. Wil. That "a" form in thesingular looks just like a Future. Anna. Only the r is wanting. Te. Now, children, the Defini of your four- teen verbs. If the Perf. Part, has already an s, you do not add another in the Defini, in two verbs, the i- of the ending of the Defini sits inside the word, an n comes after it, and then the "spelling." You have here to look first, to the regular form of the Perf. Participles and to the verbs themselves, if not a change is marked, there ; and then again, if the Defini does not differ again from the Perf. Part, as given or understood ; this, the verbs, soon will show. Go ahead. Where the Def. differs from Perf. Part., and so a Defini is marked, extra, under a verb, say it. Ch. (Reading) aim-ai, fin-i-s, d-u-s ; (marked) vend-i-s. Te. Why marked ? Ch. Perf. Part, is u, but Defini is i-. Te. Go on. Ch. Eu-s, (marked, new word) fu-s, voul-u-s, (marked, same as vend-i-s) v-i-s, vec-u-s, (marked, same as vend-i-s) veti-s. Te. And yet there is a difference; in vend-u, the u of the Perf. Part, was regular, and the Def. differed from the u ; in vet-i-s the Perf. Part, in u is irregular, and the Def. takes the regular vowel of the Perf. Part, of the 2d Conj., z'-; goon. Ch. (Reading) (marked / inside) vin-s, val-u-s ; (marked) vainqu-i-s, (trai-re, no Def.) Te. The meaning of the Def. is like the Imperfect, with the difference in the kind of meaning as understood. New Tense or form: IMPERFECT SUBJUNCTIVE, meaning: I might (love, eat, drink, sleep), the straightest form of all verbs in all languages. School-marm, Assistant : Professor ! Te. The straightest, because it -67- the chart, our "Large Chart," in the right upper corner is the ''Imperfect Subj." Wil. Oh, I see it! "Im. Su." I read it already. 7>. Now direct the cook; I am the cook: "Imperf. Subj.," children, write this in your book. Willie will dictate as to the rest. Wil. "Imperfect Subjunc- tive ;" " I Sing. Defini (i S. D.) and se^ Te. Well, then, take any D6fini, for instance, fin-ir; Def., what? Ch. Fin-i-s. Te. Now write this six times, for the persons, with se. Got it ? Ch. We have it. Te. Now go on, Willie, read from the chart ; the abbreviations in English, of course, won' k trouble you. Wil. "Plural no e." Te. Cross it out, the "e," children. Go on, Willie? Wil. "i Conj. — ajse." Te. Make a note of it, children, when you come to a verb of the i Coiy., you have to change the ai, of the ending, first to 2^s, before you add the se ; what next ? Wil. "Third singular circumflex; no sse." Te. Give circumflex there, to the vowel, i, u or a, and cross out the sse. What next ? Wil. Nothing more. Te. Plenty of it — look at Endings, Jmperf. Ind., Plur., left side of chart. What do you see on the left side of the ion- and ie-, of the Imperfect Ind. ? Wil. Also "Subjunctives." Te. Now we are here in a Subjunctive, so, children, give the ion- and the ie- for first and second plural. Wil. And now? Te. Now give the " spelling " — sing the old song — except -first per- son singular, which you see on chart as se, has no dash. Have you got it, children ? Ch. We have. Te. Now run a line through your writing, down- ward, that will on the right, have all what we wrote or operated upon, as forms belonging to the formation of the Imperf. Subj., including the s of the Defini, and on the left leave untouched all what we found ready made as Defini, except the s, and put what you have on the right side, to any Defini, or the rest of Defini, as set down on the left, and you have the Imperfect Subjunctive of any verb in the French language. School-marm. How with that change of the ai, of the first Conjugation, into af. Te. That was already mentioned and it proves how strong the rule is in this Tense or Mood, tKat it changes the ai, which, as such, is an exception, back into the rule of the s, aj. Now show me your books — but before that, put under your writing what kind of piece each part is that you used. Ch. (Writing and showing) fin. fin - i - s - se s -se fin - i- fin -i- fin-i- fin - i - s-s^ s-s\ S - Si\ D^iini. Imperf. Subj. ion- le- Endings. ent 'Spelling.' — 68 — TV. (To School-marm). ^Vill you try it with awy verb? School-marm. I see it. Te. It is hardly worth while to make forms, all is so even, obvious, but we will try a few. Anna, give me Imperf. Subj. of fai-re, Def., fi s— look at your writing— spell it out. Anna. Fisse, fisses, fit, fissions, fissiez, fissent. Te. Nellie, give me same in prend-re ; D6f., as you can see on your chart, pris. Nellie. Prisse, prisses, prit, prissions, prissiez, prissent. Te. Willie, give me same in voul-oir ; make it yourself. Wil Def., voulu-s ; Imperf. Subj., voulusse, voulusses, voulftt, voulussions, voulussiez, voulussez. Te. Children, give me, all, Imperf. Subj. of mour-ir, to die; make it 3four- selves. Wil. First question : Defini, that may be made regularly from Perf. Part., or it may be irregular and given with the verb. We have to look for mour-ir. Anna. "Perf. Part., mort j Def., mourus." Nellie, Willie. Then it must be mouru-sse, mourussej, mourOt, mourussions, mourussiez, mourussent. Te. But give it to me now in et-re. Wil. O, I know it, Def., fu-s; Imperf. Subj., fusse ; fusse, fusses, fut. Te. In avoir. Anita. I know that; Perf. Part., eu ; Def., eus ; Imperf. Subj., eusse, eusses, eut. Te. But now, lastly, in ten-ir. Nellie. (Looking at chart irregular verbs). I do not know what that will sound, but it must be tin-s-se. Te. And so let it be till you know what it will sound ; but you will come very near its sound, when you first say, as in English, rang; then, as sound, "rangs," and then, the r changed into t, "tangs," then you have it. Wil. Professor, can I scribble that Tense and its formation in my book? Te. You can, Willie; it will help you a great deal to recollect, the mere writing of it. Wil. I like that Tense, everything so even and varied. Te. Like France, variety and rule, as you heard before, that is beauty ; just like the Wanamaker square. Wil. You mean his store? Te. I do not mean his store; I do not mean here Wanamaker ; do you suppose we had nothing to do but to run Wana- maker. I mean that square of our jumping changes with "Wanamaker" in it. Anna. " Wanamaker " fe' " G?. " Te. Right, Anna, that " Wanamaker " alone would not have helped us anything, not for more than his places ; how many? Ch. Thirteen. Wil. You do not mean Thirteenth street? That is his places. Anita. You do not mean the whole of Thirteenth street? Wil. No, he left something for the Public Buildings and Market street, and for some up-town and down-town people. Te. Willie and Anita, he ought to put you in his store windows, as show boys. Anita. Oh, Professor, not me. Te. If he could, he would ; he concocts always some impossibilities, which they make possible, he and his chroniclist. Anita. How so? Te. To make people read what they write. They are probably the only writers of the age whose writings are read. Min. That is, it is large print. Te. Large print or small print, they are read. Anna. Those of the others are also read, Strawbridge and Cooper and Conard. Te. They follow his style ; I have a mind, to follow it, too. Miit. He sets the fashion in French. Te. -69- itself, variety, rule and beauty ; you will like it. Min. I like it already now, though I have not yet seen much of it. Te. Much of it ! Nearly the whole of it ; the verb is three-fourths, in French, of the trouble in French. Min. But we have not yet seen much of the verb. Te. Nearly the whole of it — five years' work — in five minutes we are through. Min. Oh, Professor, I know, I have heard people say they had worked ten years at it and are puzzled. Te. And I know people, I am one of them, it took them two, three months to send a message to' Europe, now it may go in a minute, a second. Min. Yes, that is the telegraph ; that is a new thing. 71?. And here is the telegraph, too, in French, a new thing — " Wanamaker " & "Co." — and now let us go back to our square — the square on our chart, Willie, not over there on Market street or to Eighth and Ninth streets. We have yet to do some work on that square — the "e" forms of spelling on that square, also some endings — Wil. Are there many ? Te. There are no new ones that we don't know, except three letters, that is all. Wil. Is that all? Te. Tell me the forms that belong to the square, names of Tenses or forms in English. Wil. ^'Present Participle.^' Te. This we know in its ending, Willie, what is it ? Wil. -dJiX. 7>. Next. Wil. "Imperf. Indica- tive." Te. This we l^now, Nellie, what is it? Nellie. Ai-s, ai-s, ai-t, ion-s, — . Wil.'i^o^,"Pres. Indie, Imperat., Subjunc." Te. These forms are all dumb, mute ; we have come here upon the "Berlin Academy," they have no sounded endings, except the two blue star lines, or, as we met them first, "Wanamaker" Ym&s,, first and second persons plural, z.r\A. these forms, in the first two columns here, Pres. Ind. and Imperat. are : first person, on-, second person, e-, as you see them given under the square, as by a note ; but the same persons in the last column, Pres. Subj., we have had already — where? Anna. With the Imperfect Subjunctive ; you referred us to the Imperf. Ind., where it was said that the Subjunctives have ion-, ie-, in first and second per- sons plural, and so, as this is a Subjunctive, the first and second plural are, with the spelling, ion-s, ie-z. Te. So the WHOLE first and second blue line plural has, either, the first and last column, ion- and ie-, and the two tniddle columns, Pres. Ind. and Imperat., on- and e-. The .auxiliaries in these persons of the Pres. Subj. have no i ; this you see on the chart ; they sound then on- and e-. Wil. But what will become of the other forms ? How do we hear them? Te. You hear \\\s. stem, ordinary or changed. The "spelling" goes right on the stem, and the "spelling" you do not hear; so you hear only the stem — you see this note here on our "large chart :" ring (O) and square (□), mute forms, abbreviated as O D ""^ F, just above Key I., and this, as to the word "stem" (S'M), in the place where these signs are given with verbs. Wil. Then all the seven "squares" would sound the same way, and all the "rings" the same way? Te. They do; on our large chart you see triangles used instead of squares, that makes no difference, it means the same thing. Wil. Then we would be done with that square ? Te. As to the endings, yes; but there is something left, the "spelling," and — 70 — this makes some trouble, not with us. I made you a little chart, but give it to you here, too, on the board. The " e" spelling forms of the Wanamaker square occurring with ''mute" forms, in the singular. Write this on your slate, as you have the chart. Put down for Imperat., third sing., as ''spelling''' for afl verbs, e instead of "A" Now run a line to the right, to the Present Suljunctive, singular ; that line means the carrying of the "e" form to the Subjunctive singular, which is e, e-s, e, for all verbs, (in life the e came or went the other way) ; now run a line to the left, and put again the e, e-s, e in the Present Indicative for the First Conjuga- tion (and such few verbs of another Conjugation that follow it in this), that is all. The Auxiliaries, from their nature and tendency to differ and be crooked, get in the Subjunctive and third sing. Imperat., crooked or differing' from this, and so, children, become whole or in part, in these forms, again regular in "spelling," that is, take to the s, s, t, as you see on the charts. The First Conjugation and the auxiliary av-oir, have e also in the second p£rs. sing., Imperat., and mind, children, the Subjunctive'.? throughout, and the Imperative third person sing, and plur., use the particle "que" ("that"); this you see just above the gold line in the middle of the large chart. These "e" forms you see also on Our Large Chart, in the "Spelling;" as it is abbreviated, I will read it to you in full — follow the letters, after the "Spelling:" "Singular, s, s, t; Imperative, third person, e, Subjunctive Present and first Conjugation Pres. Ind., e, e-s (this s is understood from the dash as second person singular), e; second Imperative, first Conjugation, and av-oir, e." In the 3d plural there is the ordinary spelling, -ent. Wil. And all what is not given here as the exception of such "e" forms, everywhere follows the ordinary spelling ? Te. Yes, except those few four or five verbs, that in the Pres. Ind. have x, x, t, instead of s, s, t, and this, then, is given with the verbs. There is a rule of "euphony" affecting some verbs of the fourth Conjugation ; where the stem of verbs of that class ends in t, c, or d, they take in the Pres. Ind., not the / of the third pers. sing., as the Present sing, is a mute .form, and this letter t would then come directly on these letters of the stem. Now show me the drawing of your "e" forms. Ch. (Showing). Pres. Ind. Imperat. Pres. Subj. / Con^. All Verbs. e e-s e e-s ^ e e = e "Note. — Spelling for first Conj. and av-oir: also in second Imperat. sing.,.*?; auxiliaries go back in the Pres. Subj. and Im- perat.,. whole or in part, to the s, s, t." — 71 — Give me Pres. Subj. singular of any verb; observe the square change of the stem if needed, for instance, of all-er. Ch. (Looking up the verb in their list of irregular verbs, for the stem change). Wil. I could have recollected it— the stem change is aill. Ch. The form is : aill-e, aill-e-s, aill-e. Te. Give it of mouv-oir. Ch. (Looking into lists). It is meuT«-e, meuv-e-s, meuv-e. Te. Give it in et-re; this you have to see from that "Special Chart,'' or "Page,'' for these forms of the auxiliaries, though you find it also on our " large chart." Wil. Oh, that is where the auxiliaries get crooked, that is, differ from the rule of the Subjunctive Present by getting straight — here it is : soi-s, soi-s, soi-t. Te. See also third singular Impera- tive. Wil. Soi-t ; but av-oir differs not so much from the rule of the Pres. Subj., it takes its ordinary spelling only in the 3d person singular, Subj. Pres. and Imperative, ai-A Te. AND, as we are at it: examine ist and 2d plur., Pres. Ind. of St-re, where a new stem or spelling comes in — "somme-s," " Ite-s " — this comes from the Latin. And you see the av-oir gets straight to its stem in the Imperf , and Pres. Ind. plural. Anita. And is crooked in the third person plural, Pres. Ind., ont. Wil. And so is et-re, sOnt. Te. And examine the Pres. Sing. Ind. of et re, there is a mixture of stems — sui s, es, est. Anita. And I see the i in the Pres. Subj. plural, first and second per- son, is crossed out, in gt re ; and in av-oir. Wil. The Professor told us that. Anita. But here I see it. 7!?. Now children, you learn these forms of the Wanamaker square, the sign or color places in these verbs, av oir and gt-re, best straight from this your "Special Chart," adding the pronouns: J'ai, tu a-s, il or elle a, but it will be good to observe the marks I put, as lines, under the letters wherever there is anything the matter with the word or letter. This will give you the best kind of knowledge, by heart, and at the same time intelligently as to the spelling. Wil. I am pretty sure I know already most of the forms of the square in these Auxiliaries, both by heart and as to the "spelling." Te. Let us try: third sing. Imperat. of et-re ? Wil. It is one of the forms that switch back to the rule and thereby become acting differently from the rest, like an animal that broke loose from the crowd when this is kept in its lair, and when the others break loose, goes back to its lair — it is soi-t. Te. You are or will make a first rate keeper of the Zoo — you are observant. Wil. But, Professor, the salary — I forgot almost — you said you would give us a badge or badges. Te. Just wait a minute — as says my little Louis or Lewis — not my own grandchild, he is too young yet, but another little bright boy I teach, "Just wait a minute " — tell me first, all of you, what have we to do to make any form — we speak here of simple forms — of any French verb, with those means at hand, as charts, our "Large Chart," representing the main grand bulk and staple of all- that belongs to the verb, containing all the Regular verbs and the Auxiliaries, in full, and our Lists o[ Irregular Verbs, showing Stem Changes and names of verbs, also irregularities of Perf. Part., or Defini, and then, as a mere convenience, this "Special Chart." Wil. We go first — 72 — for the Endings on the upper part of that chart— I scribbled them all in my copy book, and the " Spelling," I also put that in my copy book ; and then the Stem, or changes, which we get for the Regular Verbs and Auxiliaries on "Our Large Chart," and for the Irregular Verbs, on the List of these verbs, called the chart of the Irregular Verbs. Te. Now, try, give me Defini, second plural, of fai-re. Wil. (Musing.)' Not first Conj., so i- or ii (look- ing at "Large Chart " and scribblings in copy book) second plural, i-te-s or u-te-s— Def, "see Perf. Part."— Perf. Part., irregular, Def., not like it, given,— f-i-, f-i-te-s. Te. Anna, gi\^e third plural, Pres. Subj., "square" form, of mouv-oir; spell your answer. Anna. "Square form," mute; spelling, third plural, -ent.; stem, as on chart, changed, meuv-, meuv-ent. Te. Meuv-ent, add pronouns, and "que," before vowels qu'- (like je changed to j'). Anna. Qu'ils or qu'elles meuv-ent. Te. And what does this mean? Anna. (Consulting chart for meaning of mouv-oir) : that they may move. Te. Now change this into: "that they might move," Imperf. Subj. Anna. (Looking into charts). Def., from Perf. Part,, "mu-s;" Imperfect Subj., mu-s-se, third plural, qu'ils or qu'elles mussent. Te. Now change this form into. the same of av-oir. Wil. I know it — Te. Let Anna say it, in full ; spell it out. Anna. Qu'ils- or qu'elles eu-s-s-ent. Te. And this of et-re. Wil. "Wait a minute" — says that boy — (throwing a glance at Def of et-re on Large Chart) qu'ils or qu'elles (spelling) fu-s-s-ent. Te. And the third plural Conditional of fin-ir. Wil. I don't forget that "r" and "ai" of Conditional — ending and spelling, -rai-ent ; fin-ir has a stem change for Conditional, like Future, these above the verb (spelling) fin-i-r.ai-ent. Te. (Pronouncing) finiraient ; and with pronouns? Wil. lis or elles finiraient. Te. And what does it mean? Ch. They would finish. Te. Now, Anna and Nellie, what is die, or conquer ! in French ; you had the verbs — take, Anna, the die ; Nellie, the conquer ; Imperative, second sing., "mute;" " or" is "ou" in French. Anna. Ring place, ring change, in"mour-ir;" second sing, general spelling: meur-s. Nellie. Vainc-re, no ring change ; second person sing. , general spelling, -s, vainc-s. Te. What is : to conquer or to die ? Anna and Nellie. Vainc-re, ou mour-ir. Te. Vaincre, ou mourir, pour le President (for the President); I heard it in Paris before you were born, but he got faithless to his trust, and so like all traitors to truth and trust, he was swept away, and this, by a German. And now, children, if you have any COMPOUND FORM in English, and want to have it in French, you take just the pieces as they stand and render them as pieces into French, but pronounce them as you mean them, as a whole. What is: — '■'They shall have been loved'" — in French? I will cut the pieces, and Willie, Minnie, Anna, Nellie, you take the pieces, in this, the order of your names: "They | shall have | been I loved. Wil. "They" — ils or elles. Minnie. "Shall have" — what is that, Willie? Wil. That is third — 73 — But we had so much since — that ride. JJ^tV. Then make it from the chart ; you see the Future stem of av-oir, au, don't you? And the endings of the Future {J^), third plural ; you don't see the r with the -ont, but it is meant, from the first person singular. Mtn. Au-ront? Wt7. Of course, auront. Te. Say the two words together — they shall have — in French, Willie. Wi/. lis or elles auront. Te. When a word closes with a consonant, and the next opens with a vowel, we commonly in French make that consonant heard with that vowel — ils or elle-s-auront — Anna? Anna. "Been;" Perf. Part, of et-re, ete, it is under the word, on the large chart. Nellie. "Loved;" Perf. Part., i Conj., of aim-er, aim-e. Te. But, children, Perf. Part, are sometimes like adjectives in French, as I told you once before, they show in the Passive voice, that is, when they are real adjectives, number and gender. When it is plural, they must have an s at the end, and when it is feminine, an e, for this feminine, with the ending. What will then here be the form of aim-e, with the ils, "they?" Anna. Aim-e-s. Te. And; with a feminine, singular. Nell. Aim-ee. Te. And with feminine, plural. Nellie. aim-ees. Wil. That is very exact, complete, it helps to see the form. Anna> But would not the ils or elles show it, that it is plural and feminine. Te. It would show it as fact to the understanding, but not as fancy, as a picture. If you say : they are broken, meaning six plates, how many cracks do you see? Ch. Six. Now these six show as a picture to the mind in the s of the plural. Anna. But what has the feminine to do with that ? that makes, or I think could make, no difference. Te. If six men are cracked, is it the same kind of crack as if six women were cracked ? Wil. I think it would make a difference. In the case of the men, the crack would go through the head ; in the case of the women, it would go through the whole women. Te. Why, Willie? ^//. Well, the men have more to do with their head, and when they get cracked, it affects more their head, but the women, are the whole body. Te. You are a philosopher, too good for a keeper of a Zoo ; I make you Assistant Professor. Wil. With assistaitt's salary? Te. Yes, with assistant one-half part of my salary. Anita. But you said, Professor, you had not any. Te. The bigger the chance for Willie. If I had one, it would be fixed. He would have a chance with something that is limited, but now he has a chance at something that is nothing, and so, unlimited, and so the bigger his chance. Anita. I should prefer the limited. Stephen. So should I! Rest of children. So would we! Te.' Then suppose we' go .into partnership, limited, to-day. Ch. What is that. Professor? Te. In partnership limited each partner bears before the public only a part of the responsibility; so with us and the book we write, I bear the expense of the printing, and you, for the book. Ch. But with the in- come, the salary? Te. That goes to you, limited. Now that crack, that is, that difference in gender as feminine, comes out in the "e," and in the case of a plural, with the "s" of the plural; the notation of this is given on our Large Chart in a note to the " Perf Part.," under " Key II," as— "Pa." — 74 — (Passive) "infl.," (inflected). Now give me: To have \ loved. Anna. Av-oir I aim-e ; is there an e, if feminine ? Te. No, Anna, it is not Passive ; the Passive takes that inflection because the act is shown on the actor, and shows as adjective, a quality of the actor, and as such is naturally affected to some extent by the sex — this as sex of words called gender. To have black- ened — that shows on some one else, as black ; to be blackened, shows on your- self, the party blackening; and so, to have cracked, shows on the plate, but to be cracked, shows on the man or woman, and then, as Willie had it, with a difference. Anita. Professor, you make us almost philosophers. Te. No, children, you give me a chance, unlimited, to be one, and I improve it, limi- ted ; you will read this all in the book, and you can think of it. Now say : having been loved, Nellie, — having — been — loved. Nellie. (Looking to large chart for the having) ay-ant — et6 — aim-e (masc), aim-ee (fern). Te. And as we have or had two Imperfects, Imperfect and D6fini, so we have two Plu- perfects ; the one compound with the Imperf., the other with the Defini, and they differ as Pluperfects, as the Imperf. and Defini differ themselves in meaning, consequently, Anna : I had loved, with Imperf. Anna. J'av-ai-s — aim-6. Te. Now with Defini? Anna. J'eu-s — aim-e. Te. Now, Nellie, I had been loved, with Imperf. : I had — been — loved. Nellie. J'av-ai-s — ete — aim-e (or aim-ee). Te. And with Defini ? Nellie. Y&is — ete — aim-e (or aimee). Te. The compound with the Defini is called Past Anterior; the other, with the Imperfect, is the common "Pluperfect;" and as you have Present, Past and Future time for the ordinary Tenses, so you have the Present and Past also for the Conditional : I should love, I should have loved ; and these as Passives, I should be loved, I should have been loved, no Future Conditional extra, because the "should" is already a kind of Future. Give me: I should have {Qow^xXxo'o.zS) — been — /opir^, in French ; read it off the chart (if needed), its parts. Nell. J'au-rai-s | ete | aim-e or aim- ee. Te. And so in the Subjunctive, you have Present and Past — that I may love, that I may have loved ; and these, as Passive, that I may be loved, and that I may have been loved, or, as past, not as act, but as condition, negatived by the use of the Imperfect Subjunctive, simple or compound : that I might love, that I might have loved, or in Passive, that I might be loved, and that I might have been loved. Anna, Nellie, Willie, Stephen, give me these four in French. Anna, "that — I might love," Imperf. Subj. of aim-er, i Conj., from Def. Anna. Que — j' aim-a-s-se; is it that? Te. Yes, it is. Nellie, compound "that — I might have — loved,'' Imperf Subj. of av-oir, with "loved." Nellie. Que | j' eu-s-se | aim e ; is it that? Te. It is ; Willie, Passive, "that — I might be — loved," Imperf. Subj. of fit-re. Wil. Que | je fu-s-se | aim-6; is it that? Te. It is; Stephen, the worst; take time; examine the pieces; "that — I might have \ been \ loved ;" compound form of 6t-re, with "loved ;" the compound made with av-oir, Imperf. Subj. of ^v-oir. Steph. Say it -75- Stephen. (Slowly reading and picking up forms). Que — j' eu-s-se — ete — aim-e; is that right? Te. Children, is that right ? " That "—and then go on. Ch. Que — je — eu-s-se — ^j'eusse — ete — aim-e; that is right. Te. Now say this rapidly : Que j' eusse et6 aime (saying it). Ch. (Repeating). Te. Now, Nellie, write first person plural of this, on board. Nellie. (Writing). Que — nous — eu-s-s-ion-s — ete — aim-es, or aimees. Te. Pro- nounced (children repeating) Que nous eussions ete aim6s or aimees. The Rule for making Compounds, you find at the foot of "Our Large Chart:" "Compounds, as in English," abbreviated as " Cmp a i E" — and so, children, from " Our Large Chart " and the List of verbs, called the Chart of the Irregular Verbs — you copy these all, those in large print, during the summer — any other form, simple or compound, of any verb of the French Language. Write down on your slate, under your last exercise — "End of French verb total, for children and adults. ' ' Wil. Is that all ? Te. That is all. Take up any of the forms of the fifty-two pages of Fasquelle's Gram- mar, and see whether you can not make it with your charts. It is a good book and it would pay to have a copy of it. Wil. Oh, Professor, wouldn't you give us a copy of "Our Large Chart," I scribbled its contents, the endings, spelling and verbs, in my copy book, all except the color forms of the Wanamaker square in the Auxiliaries, at the bottom of the Chart, because we had them as a Special Chart, but I should like to have it as a whole. Te. Yes, Willie, here are TWO ; the abbreviations in English explained on one, below, on the other around it ; and here is some Text, too, for your older brothers and sisters ; if they can not get on alone with it, help them out. And here are your BADGES, both in colors of the rainbow, and in gold ; wear them either way. Children. (Looking at them and examining them) : Oh, the Postage Stamp ! The Postage Stamp ! Our Large Chart ! / Thunders of collapse of colleges and schools, pieces of plastering fall from the shock, from the ceiling, and from beneath an old former sign board over the door, covered by it, appear in letters of gold, shooting like rays of lightning, and as with a golden spray and hue, over the whole length of the rooms, the words : — First National School of America! COMF-LETE CURRICULUJVE. NO OPTION. NO WASTE OE YOUTH AND TIME. FIRMNESS. DISCIPLINE, KINDNESS. THE AMERICAN SYSTEM. University and Kindergarten Combined. Principal. Manager. Chestnut Street. PHILADELPHIA, PA. (all Graduates of the Normal School) Teachers. Janitor and Keeper of the BaHoon. -76- CONTENTS-SPECIAL. Preface Main Contents First Session. The Subject — Incidents, Tenses and Modes. One Tense introduced. Page Study, introduced 5 French — "The Verb," 5 Tenses, Time. Modes of Noting Tmie... 6 Accent 6 Augment. Pres'ent and Present' 6 Fare'well and Farewell' 7 Past, Present and. Future Time : Signs.... 8 From the '\ left to the right" 8 Future Tense, "Binding," 9 Modes, some modes : Participles, Infinitive 9 Voice.; 9 Other modes 9 Root, Stem 10 Changes of Stem 10 One Change — Mode of noting it — Future. 10 One Form in Full 10 List of Charts ( WorkingCtiaAs and Verbs.) 1 1 Second Session. The Work of the Children with the Charts. One Tense, the Future Tense — One form, in the fourteen verbs II, 12 One Tense, the Future Tense, in one verb, in full, without Pronouns.... 12, 13 "Spelling" Letters (Silent end letters) introduced 13 The Pronouns of the Verbs 13 One Tense, the Future Tense, in one Verb, with Pronouns in French and English in full. 14 Preparing for the balloon 14 One Tense, the Future Tense, in all the verbs, with Pronouns in French and English in full, and the name of the Verb, as Present Infinitive, in French and English added 14, 15 Practice of this, with the Verbs 15, 16 Third Session. Study on Endings. Classes of Verbs. The Ride Through the Sky. IN THE balloon. Study on Endings 17 Classes of Verbs — " Conjugations" 17 The Ride Through the Sky. Classes of Verbs in Latin — the reasons why 18 Classes o{ Actions 18 Explained by Willie 21 Classes of Vowels 23 How the Clashes of Vowels got in Latin into the Clashes of Verbs 23 HailColumbi^! The "New Rome"... 24 Classes of Actions as seen and heard as classes of verbs 24 The Storm of the Signs : "Impulse" 25 "Motion" 25 " Contact" 26 "Effect left 26 3 4 "Deponent" Verbs 26 The Transit Class 26 The Verbs in their Classes, Oi fingers and hand. 26 Classes of Verbs, as Classes of Actions, in French 27 The Ghosts of the Ccesars shaken out of their graves 27 Vocal "Spectrum" 28 Other Spectra : — Hamlet 28 Judgment Day 28 Ho w to get a good picture 28 Quadrant of Infinity 29 The center in its poles 30 Need of Christ ; bushel and peck ; the rosebush and the rose 31 Reconciliation of Freedom with Justice through Infinity. The L ogic of Forces 32 Higher and Higher! , 32 Hymn of Science on Christ 32 Challenge to the " Physicists" ... 33 Application 33 Evolution and Logic. , 34 The Children in a plight 34 Explosion of the Gases 34 Finishing Strokes. The divisions in Nature as Phases of action 35 Fixed as intent by the Laws of Action 35 The children as children, and not as monkeys 35 The Ghosts as stars, and wit- nesses of the Presence of the Lord among the Heathen 36 Garfield 36 " Migration of Soul" ' 36 '' From the Dead to the Living".. 36 The "Northern Slcy" 36 The American Flight, Part I. "Smashed the Romans: three times" — "Defini"— Methods, Z<22z«^j-i-^ The Spectres multiply — Wana- maker and Patti — Off to Berlin ! — A hundred thousand miles a minute —Philadelphia— The Bullitt Bill— Magazines — " The fault of . the , Leaders" — "Get Down, Sir!" — Difference between American and Foreigner — The " Flea in the Ear" — Need of some women for that Boy— Bridget, and the North Pole — Where is the " Nigger " — The Big Church — Tke Bishop — Foreign " Niggers " — German, and any Language, in " Twenty Lessons ! ' ' — "Harvard" — "First Class Miml" — Means "to be heard" — lllu - trated — The Bo-'k and the Critic — ■7T — ■78- Quotation — "The Car is on fire !" — Daisies and Darlings of the Press — A deas/— The only "new Science, Cookery' — The men with • the souls of dogs, "you know " — and so they "caught it!" 36-41 Modern Spectra. The Northern Sky, with its classes of Will, as action 41 Copy of the Constellation of the North, as classes of will as action, each star a triple star of sound, meaning and color 42 "Umlaut" 42 A Rainbow Spelled 43 "Aurora Borealis" — The Rainbow of Life, the English Language... 44 Berlin — The Academy 44 Remedy against Lock-jaw ; Family News, read by Minnie 45 The American Flight, Part IL — Handle, and not broom — Grant. The New System — Its Claims — Save the Classics ! — Kinds of Study — One thing seen as two things — boors and babies — tnind as slave — evolution, or development down- ward — means to turn it upward — Study of matters of mind — Infusion of Light — Effects — Peace 46-48 Paris — Nenia. Dropping of theroj^ 48 Home Again. Explanation : The Reason Why as to the " Do you know how to read and write?" — Foresight in the Pre- paration of the Balloon. The Ave- nue that divides, here, the Verbs 48 Fourth Session. Stem Changes. Regular and Irregular Verbs. Straight and Jumping Changes. The Fight. Examining the written verbs 49 Outside and Inside Changes; Regular and Irregular Verbs 49 Additional Feature which may constitute an Irregular Verb 49 Review of the preceding 50 Review of Charts again : The Chart of the Regular, and the Chart of the Irregular Verbs 50 Notation of deflections in Compound Verbs, from the form of the Simple Verb 50 Willie and the " Zoo ; " " salary," pros- pect, and the "Badges;" 51 Other Changes : Straight and Jumping Changes. The"Wanamaker" Square. 51 Principles; the Race and Jumping Ground ; Signs ; Illustrated : Names, Verbs. Boi-re, boiv-, and buv- ; prend-re, prenn- and pren-; mouv-oir ; v-oir; all-er 51 Recapitulation 56 Use oicolorsin the square 57 The Square in Action, Fighting its way 58 Blank! 60 The Square in peace ; methods in schools 60 Other methods — learn "like a child!" 61 Ladies' " shopping and memorandum book" 62 Lessons for next time 62 " Le Jardin de Versailles " [French Gardening applied to Speech) 62 It pleased one grandchild, and it will please others 62 Fifth Session. The Tenses of all Verbs, Simple and Com- pound, in full. The Verb Completed. The Children's Reward. New Text, abridged. Formation of Present Participle 63 Imperfect Indicative 63 Conditional 64 Perfect Participle 64 The Third Conjugation considered m gen- eral. Out of line 64 Synopsis of Contents of Key 1 65 Formation of Defini ; Definitions; line, point ; Per- fect, point oi effect of line 65 Endings in full.. ^ 66 Imperfect Subjunctive ; "pepper-pot;" Willie dictating, from " Our Large Chart;" Diagram 66 Closing Work : Endings of the " Wana- maker " Square, (Key II.) ; the mute forms of that square ; the spelling of the forms of that square; the " e" forms of the'spelling of that square ; Diagram.... 69 The movements of the Auxiliaries, on the " Wanamaker" Square; to be ■ learned from " Special Chart" 71 Practice and survey of these movements, with "Special Chart" 71 Recapitulation : Construction of simple verb forms, from the Charts 71 Compound Verb Forms. Principle; illustrated 72 Carrying of Consonants 72 Perfect Participle, "inflected;" the reason why ; the "cracks," with a d'iilerence, as explained by Willie 73 Partnership, "limited" 73 French Modes and Tenses explained in English 74 The two Pluperfects 74 Formation and Practice in French, of Compound Verb Forms 74 The "Worst of All" 74 " End of French Verb total, for Chil- dren and Adults "... 75 The Children's Request, and Rewards.... 75 ■79- Contents, special, vfith. their pages 78 Index, of topics affecting the structure of the Verb 79 Text " for older brothers and sisteis "... 80 Charts. List in general See front of book, page 4 Working Charts : " Our Large Chart " Fol. Charts I Blackboard Copy of Cut from Chart Irreg- ular Verbs Fol. Charts III (Chart of Irregular Verbs, in full, used incidentally, See here Fol. Charts XHI-XXIV.) Special Chart, of forms of Auxiliaries in the "Wanamaker Square ;" also, "e" forms in general, of the "spelling" of that square Fol. Charts XII Materials. Children's Copy Book, five pages. Here, with Willie's scribblings, Fol. Charts V-XI. Advertisements, given here as ^part of the Contents of the book, see/)-o«/of book, p. 4. INDEX ON TOPICS AFFECTING THE STRUCTURE OF THE VERB. Auxiliaries, II, 12, 15, 71. Badges, $1, 71, 75, Fol. Charts II. Blackboard Copy of Cut from Chart Irreg. Verbs, 11, Fol. Charts III. "Blank," (X) ($2, 62). Carrying Consonants, 73. Chart Irreg. Verbs, II, 71, Fol. Charts XIII- XXIV. Circumflex accent, 12, 66, 67. C/aw« of Actions, in general, 18; in French, 27. Classes oiWerhs, Conjugations in French, 17. Colors applied to Wanamaker Square, 57. C(7OT/o««i/ forms, formation of, 72, 75. Conditional, 9; formation of, 64; compound, 74. Copy book. Children's, Fol. Charts V-XI. Crooked Stem Changes, see "Jumping Stem Changes." Cut from Chart, Irreg. Verbs, 8 Verbs, 11. Deflections of Compound Verb forms from Simple Verbs, 50. Defini, definition, 65 ; formation, 65 ; Endings . in full, 66. Euphonic Changes, Stem, 1st Conj., 50 ; "Spelling," 4th Conjug., 70. Endings, General, list, see "Large Chart," top, -vi'Ah. " Note," under Key II ; Children's copy-book, Fol. Charts, VI ; Special Tenses and Modes. Infinitives, 15, 17, 48; "Sub- junctives," 67, 69 ; Pres. Ind. and Imperative, 69. "e" "Spelling" forms, "Wanamaker Square," 69, 70. Future, formation, 9. Imperative, explained, 51 ; formation, 69, 70. Imperfect Ind., explained, 51 ; formation, 63. " Subj., 66. " Irreptlar Verbs, " 49 ; Chart, Fol. Charts XIII-XXIV; Blackboard copy of Cut from Cht. Irreg. Verbs, see "Blackboard." Jardin de Versailles, 62. Jumping Stem Changes, 51. Key I, referred to, 65. Key II, see " Wanamaker Square." " Large Chart," ID, 50, 57 ; Copy, Fol: Charts I. " LeamingViks: a Child," 61. Mood, explained, 9. Mute Forms (ringand square places in "Wana- maker " Square), 69. Participles, explained, 9. Partnership, "limited," 73. Perfect Participle, meaning, 9 ; formation, endings, 64 ; effect of irregularities in ending, 49 ; " inflected," 73. Pluperfects, tvi^o, 74. Present Indicative, meaning, 51 ; formation, 69. " Participle, explained, 51 ; formation, endings, 63. " Subjunctive, explained, 51; formation, 69, 70. Pronouns, personal, for verbs, 13. " Que" with Subjunctives and 3d Sing., and P!ur. Imperative, 70. " Regular Yeihs," 49. Pool, see " Stem." " Special Chart," 71; Fol. Charts XII. " Spelling," (silent end letters) general, 13 (70); "e" forms, 70; Fol.Chai'ts VI. Stem, of Verb, 10. Stem changes, 49. 5a4;»»f^zV«, explained, 9 ; Present, 69; Im- perfect, 66 ; compound, ex- plained, 74 ; formed, 74. Teaching, French Verb in Schools, 60. Third Conjugation, abnormal, 64. Voice^ explained, 9. " Wanamaker" Square, 53. "Zoo;' of Verbs, 51. TAcy^K— Correction : page 20, line 12, put "stunned" in parenthesis, as an explanation of "struck." 1 t^icjur uLuer i:>ruLn.eri> ana omtn ; All above the gold line are the sounded endings of all verbs, under their proper heads of Tenses or Modes in English, with the exception- of the Infinitives, which are given with the verbs, and a gold note under the colored square. Below the gold line are first : the spelling (" Sp.") or silent end letters, which you see but do not hear in verb forms, and, then, two keys explaining the meaning of stem changes or full forms given with the verbs ; Key I explaining this meaning by position, according as a change is written above or below the verb ; Key II, by colors or signs, the color or sign found with a change as given with a verb, referring the change to the places that have the same color or sign in the square, the same color or sign meaning always the same places, and so showing as a recurrence on the square, of signs, dX fixed places, the recurrence of changes on that square in the verb, if they once occur, dX fixed "gtXdiCes, and so a new law of the French verb; if a word singly deflects from the rule of changes, it is given with the change. The rest are the verbs themselves, given in the Present Infinitive Mood, which shows the Conjugation, with their stem changes around them ; the regular verbs through the middle, the two auxiliaries at the foot of the chart, and a few notes ; compounds, as in English — see foot of chart. Example, for making Verb Forms. — Required: Pres. Part, of FIN-ir. Process — ending (see " Endings,") -ant. " Spelling " — none needed, -ant given as full form of ending (no dash after it). Stem, FIN-, ordinary ; but you see direction to change for " Pres. Part.," in the FIN-ir (X -iss-), the star meaning, here, always, "Pres. Part." (see colored square), consequently, stem for Pres. Part., FIN-iss-, and the form — FIN-iss-ant. This FIN-iss-ant, standing here as fixed and unfailing as Pres. Part, of FIN-ir, as in any grammar. So any other form ; where a dash follows the ending, the "spelling" has to be suppHed in the place of the dash — from the lists ("Spelling.") Note.— As the reprint of "Our Large Chart," in its original size and shape, is not as distinct in the transfer on the Charts, as it can be made from type, I give it here, on these pages, without a transfer, direct from type. P.O. U.S. —^ THE FRENCH VERB ?^ (Four Reg. Conjug's, and Auxil'6) ' IN FULL FROM TYPE. CoIm[j'|PP^1.2iS4u|Z>|[m5ulS S r.pii- r-«li..-li-Cu..PP ICIDi £co (a-B|lAlM.irl.>,k..l.. P=.rioB.(o-.-.-<.»t)''(.)m^| - 1 i.-|0-i-A -i-.r ' («) (e- I P PrPi.i-|-l-r[ ^'(e)T-lno . OAmu Tl |8u>dt1«3qii»;3einau« -FiCjODloi-IPrPXrinlF- ~ /■S'Slf-lADlS — MPP(I>|3%|«T- ^f>.S>,..rIi>3.|r Jupiicj oaT»...,._, PU. t-'IITEKD-r^X I XfXt X = 2i.ici,», .pik-i-jTi^VIa; ■,iD>.tni|aui>*-|Ei]<]*oi»f*- tl ■l.»-|.l-ff |e«-l.iol.Uoi-S.=. ■u-UISl PI|ii<.U,tI>(PIwnt-& {Ii>]&t>[r^u|.u(rii. I «■•*•' I'll •a[na I'lCmp ■ iE|Bn ■oj-(Da • BY PROF. C. C. SCHAEFFER, PHILADELPHIA. BnUrtd attttdmt fo A,t of Confrr,,.. in f At f •«- 1882, U C. J. ( ikaiffr, in l\( OJfitt a/ iht Librarian » (0;ilF of Frtotl, CAart ■'. prinUi rf>>>«rlv/ram noM&It lypt an a U. S. Patlat—StatKf. t^' £ Signed, MacKbllar, BMtTni k Jordah. iDloiT-isxiOl-A .-3|«T-olrlX|0[OU« ^.S>,..rIi>3.|D|ulX|0|A Un nimmiirrri Ml ^,.Q^.^ ^ iMM'iir^- ii i iii irBriin iiiii iiMi^ -•~iiw ii ii ,^^—f 1 1 jj n i, i ii ii i i iinii' i n M iiii—iiiiin ■tt Pr? al QA mil Fl f S'us ar kTa^TTTs'A no s^e iy~z^ ^- - -Tgr- - ju;.- -■-;.^^ . -'-Tn.to '■- v^^--^^rii^i---^'xm--~-''^--i''?---'-'.^i~'-i.-*sir — "-vJi.f''^=2»s™-i;^-' — ^^^Fi'"^-^!^ — 'TEST*" Mk MP? (BM^ 'e V«o lxI X I O O A 7? AVEMIXjFelxix X X 6 .^^ au 3 PoKltriT4fet-iPI somm«. ^PI a fc lf^-~ \ ve i8 -* g^Xfjlfe^yvcd. C «vp * i t „ C^ AV:i,T-;oot lKTi»\.PI»5COE,»- PROF. C. C. SCHAF.FFER, FHILADtL'=>H1A. / \ \ / \ 1 1 ; / / PO./lDO-(io-»-oi.l> "(ilmo-l PrPk-l-l-lT '-Mr-l"^* OAmoF||6ii.AlDrv,nft|aainou* -.TJiOKbh.l-|FrPSlttlPII»3n W PPftia'il V- Jl tVs 10 1 1 A W 21.10*:., ?iB(-^-(|s;i4!i^ Bi- 1 » 1 at P[ J-- 1 ., (lof ?l.gQl S. •oli«.*80mp»lEBiaoE05-(DL.J X ^- / \ \ \ \ I B lotC VvV) OlY ^ . CW Ci -iJV. ^ . H ^' <>-V . J^-m-rv. G^ou^Xr /(^'^^^Jft •/; / I rciti ^6(. ay- V e c - 1 » I/. V € C Li / / tit ^i! -e^i I R t'*!^ Q^Y:ra-x,K,t ov^tti ¥.€ nXi.. ( f ^' t >. l^' ^ or.. C. C. SCHAEFF£|\ ^ / y' Va4^ i / ij^fEftoi ^.^ / . Ck . ^en. y _^_££__£_, / hi'^ ^i,f'^- r/\;:r*i^;Jr;t^^V fo C.vii . (C-^ldA-f!^'') (--O-pi^ fi^(nri<^ ^ ^ ^ § i (SMl^ (3 ff&-^'t'T4^yn^ > _ ffyz^ V ^^.^^^ X^^ .. =-_. 2? /E.^'^^'A. «' I '^ /^^rt au^'^^ ^ 't^e^ -^'/i -i'&'-ry-m^ ; Y\JWL'] -e^. Ye^?^W| r... J.. Jo I jh W0JOL Uv^ VJLV -t = 'I! .hf %' ^^^ /' 3 ^(_/iijE.*|lli (jrfi^ na,riL^ '\\&-'^^^Uh^ JjZAu3^ , VM J^xA^'iAJi^ t/^^i^<^ , J-'TX- -71 J . f%^ I iLe, l4 unit ,3 . ypMM UnM.' 4 if-i. (M-H-^^VV^ -€_»<» X^-^ Z6/.4r :**fef i/)'*L^ iyft£ Je^u-e^ , 4 m ^4Ai4€^cm,^. L-v*. ^vxXV- -C6. i/w. U^ f V^4^£iv QA\A^£n»V., <»».^ .. ^ £4-3 j)n-c^ Q, ^f otlx * 1 K{v.yg(lK8>| kn-cLc^ Ui^^ (XA.en/t ^tfts^^ CS 5* "5 ' AX.tfrwti "Z'^ O/mA. t^riu Cjj vv_Si) -Wt- DOLbvctv- O- ctcy tot, e i, ^ Z? a. e u uxe^ii, . yoiA d „ T^e (x A i> i oi-^- I Ana ilqa „ L/l (to cS^jJuhxft , A-) i (^CJ ucc^A/^Uue^i A.J fe^l) s a iA. s |wu9 jD'' i i iXC'4/i^Ji-A^-i QjjAy^.crlvSMjt _ D cU^CytXtll- ....e ^oi.Kty ^-o yi fj^' R lfii1>; .,!t- ' ijj {t^ aaImAl.^A:] U CUM OAcit^ 4 • B y 0L4. ^ 7^,. CI r«M, ; / i^ci {0^4 is. « .0.1 io ftswy^Joir -^^ ■rM-4,44^=>£/ •) 4i£, a^ //J Jii ~tnj foi xy ;0_'C£LMJ _ D Cil LiJiU - I to- ^yjid , A , > *i^ / |'^(a/n.C.4l -^4=, Ci>tcJii.cl-x^/)^ cut {_^ e£ri4-^, I 3 Stk,aj._ £t«Mt^P c im^a^t. ^ij^ift-y ]) Ct-tVJ-VtA-' / epyut UM^-Uh /M (jt© 6m O, / /-^ A . , See. CuL^tn^ 0X4^5 '5 \ l£/iUL.Ly 0-- ^ S- Jwi V D Caw^» J-U < Feu. ii- „ t/1, pi-fiuX-L^vy r i -f" — ' J ! 4U. lAcAjzJt.e^ j ia4i.5 X™^^»™ (tu/ilttV^ l-Tvt^liA^ ) .~Q a. . , — : _/ , a . i^-i - fj-ao^lXa^ , J/>r<>|i-4.M J LiXA. I fA^rr J? C^ . C--tU-(J C-'XA^' 6-t. hwpVvv ^ ■k:-^!. f>V€/VX^ n. Lait'i- «44 t - V./U > f&i .KX 0__Jrtefc Mel:r, •'at.AA- O 'yyuiA^iM^ VVhOA^iA, H f ORr- i/V H^wub -rr 1/0 i-.^U'i^'w' ,, c ; G'^.-* .&^~iA t G VysJlMA?"- I Co iftx-rvt, ,. A ■ , ills I tl-^-^, '') @i :Q;_L^^fei4dVa^_ ^ 04.4 y I = t -^ UaJ t ., L quiaji-zaA' I i €4.0, ^ -^ , ^ ^n #!!-■?/, XytCfuK _0| j-ataA/ c O /? cu,s i 'IP'J . P-n T^IL XXf,- 4 lUy •^-e-e. C£.<.^i :<>i- .- i-e . j^-r:tet;:a,ia?- P -U4,' ^03":^^^:!^ :0--3:S-..:|j:«Xa'-fe' ^ C./r..-4. ., ?-£• I P ri V - <; c/t (X P V^ ^"^y ' (to ^irre4 6e / i-e FoUinV-OLX^ l;iouYvoy - j U€^ ,IA^ to /tfck,, dxJl • ^1^. BfJL a to foJAKil •t'i€ ^^e^^lil '/Jj- 'A. ^£g -pl-X_. io '"iu f L ^^t ,1 f . _^ t, /I ^: R !/YLp > 1^ [ .UJm— M- B— «y— ^w —,, ■■■ .J ~~rH — _) y IX tC-8-'' lAJ't' , ~i& isp&^ ->v <^ UJLA, ( A ;^ ADVERTISEMENTS: Lecture — English. Cuts — Greek, Latin. Specimen Pages — Grerman, " High-School Manual." Publications — " The American System." Diagram — Explaining System. Papers — Old, Philadelphia. Expenses — Public Ledger of System. (X'lie folios seeu ou pages are those of tlie plates.) THE "WROUGHT" LA:NGUAGE. INTRODUCTOEY TO A COUESE OF LECTUEE8 ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE; OR, ffiwgUsIt ^xpteitted on ^xmipU m& 3t&nt«& to ^Jau'. By Peof. C. C. SCHAEFFER, LATE PEOFESSOR OF THE GERMAN LANGUAGE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA. [ABSTRACT.] Special Theme of English Pabt of Lectuee. — By what gen- eral quality does English pronunciation differ from that of any other language? MY friends, though we may not agree as to anything else, we certainly shall as to the magnitude of the task in the course before us. Yet, could you see the labors which underlie it, the Charts which have been made, large and small, then you would think if there are any results to be obtained by honest digging, they probably have been brought out here, though even then you might doubt whether they were at once in such a shape as to make them accessible to all. They were not so originally, but, thanks to the class-room, they are so now. Among these Charts, to which I have just referred, is one, the " Square Inch," or, representation of the or- dinary Latin model verbs, showing every voice, mood, tense, number, and person of each and all of the follow- ing, viz., the common model verbs, Amo, Moneo, Regn, Audio, representing the four regular conjugations; the four deponent verbs, Hortor, Tueor, Fruor, Molior ; the verb in " io " in third con- jugation, Qapio ; the verb both depo- nent and in " io," Patior, and the auxiliary "sum" — the whole being printed from type on the space of one inch square. If, on examination, the notation of any one form of any of these verba should be found wanting on the " Square Inch," I would not press any further the claims of the system. But, if the Chart is complete, as it is, then I would beg to see in the saving of time effected by simplification in this one important item, which is but a type of many others of a similar kipd, the prospect of new National schools, wherein the Classics can be taught and kept side by side, with the study of the so-called " exact " sciences. Who will plead the dropping of the " CLASSICS " from want of time, when, with a copy of the "Square Inch " en- larged, one-half of the inflectional forms of Latin can be taught and learned in an hour or two? Who will plead it, for convenience, that is money's sake, where that want is supplied? If we had the statue of Olympic Zeus, Entered according to Act of CongreBs, in the year 1875, by C. J. C. SCHAEFFER, in tlie Office of the Librariaa of Congress, at Washington. 244 2 THE "wrought" language. 245 which was made of gold and ivory, would you counsel the breaking up of the statue to enlarge with the gold pieces on the nature of gold, or to illustrate with the ivory pieces a lec- ture on ELEPHANTS ? Gold was part, and ivory was part ; but the statue of the god, made in the image of man, was a whole; and man, made in the. image of God, is a whole; and in studying language, we study that whole. Will any one fight the "classics," and with what? With the Natural Sciences ? But Language itself is a science — the chief of sciences — giving unity and a definition to all the others, and teach- ing, not the nature of stones, reptiles, insects, birds, but the nature of man. Let us, then, join in teaching the Natural Sciences with the Science of Language, as Logic incarnate, at their head. As this assertion of the scientific nature of Language is so novel that your minds naturally require some- thing more than a mere assertion to feel assured of its truth, it is my pur- pose now to show you some of the phil- osophical reasons or principles upon which all language is based, and by the use of these "keys" to unlock be- fore your eyes, vast and hitherto un- visited chambers of thought. It was as early as twelve years ago, that, in order to explain the "Umlaut," ormodification in German of the vowels a, o, w^ into a, o, u, I presented for the first time, in public, a certain little dia- gram, showing the natural position of the vowels in the mouth in the moment of utterance. The explanation was afibrded by a certain contrast of the vowels visible in this their position, such contrast consisting in the diifer- euce of the direction of two lines which we are to regard as the lines of the vowels. * Pronounced as in the English words father, open, true. A, 0, and u* were put in this order on a horizontal line ; e and if were put in this order on a line starting from the other line at the point "a", more vertical than the first and yet follow- ing it in its general direction. A curve bending around a and enclosing the lines, indicated the cavity of the mouth, the throat being at the point "a;" thus : Diagram showing the natural position of the vowels in the mouth, in the moment of utter- ance. This diiference in the direction of the lines, along which the vowels are Uttered, was explained as, caused by a corresponding difference in the direc- tion of thought when engaged in the production of vowels. The a, o, u were explained as caused by an action of thought in the direction of the idea of the object, foewaed; the e and i by an action of thought in the direction, or axis, of the idea of the subject, TJPWAKD. Just as in like case, hand and arm, to show these directions to the eye, either press forward S^'you, or rise upward ^ I, so here lips and tongue to note these directions to the ear engage in movements the effect^ of which in one case, the lips protruding and the tongue yielding, is a pushing of the sound bodily forward, a, a, u; in the other, the tongue rising to press with its back towards the wall of the mouth — the lips yielding and reced- ing — is a raising of the place and narrowing of the space of emission of t Pronounced like ay in saxi, and ee in see. 246 THE "WEOUGHT LANGUAGE. sound, and thus a rise of sound, bodily upward, first e, then i. So that the idea of the object sounded is a, o, u ; that of the subject e, and i: the "a," from its place and position at the point of deflection of the lines, being, in so far as they deflect, a neutral vowel, and as such in th^ classics neuter vowel, and in so far as they are lines, the mother vowel, and thus, in the classics again, the feminine vowel, though as far as a certain direction is a feature of the lines, it counts with the lower line. Personal pronouns of the first person singular may therefore be expected to show, as they do show, the upper vowels, those of the second person, the lower, and this is all brought about as naturally, simply, mechanically, and instinctively, as a form of notation by the muscles of the lips and tongue as is another form of notation, elsewhere, by those of the hand and arm. The a, o, u are, therefore, the objective vowels, the e and i the subjective ones. Further, as the line of the lower, ob- jective vowels a, o, u, the horizontal line, is at the same time the axis of the intent of speech, communication to others, the vowels located on that line we may consider the positive vowels, and those located on the line deflecting from this (to the exclusion therefore of the "a") the negative ones. Moreover, as the vowels of the lower line, the a, o, u, are produced by an act of inflation, or accumulation of sound, we call them, as we find them to be, the heavy, sub- stantial vowels; whilst those located on the other line, effected by a process of compression, attenuation or diminu- tion of sound, we call, as we find them to be, the light, formal, accessory vowels. The "Umlaut" is a modification of the objective, positive, heavy vowels, by the subjective, negative, light ones ; and if the principles involved in the fore- going explanation are right, must occur wherever the meaning of the word ia similarly modified. That this is actu- ally the case, we shall now proceed to demonstrate. In the first place, then, the "Um- laut," as a form of grammatical inflec- tion, takes place in the Plural of mas- culine and neuter words, wherever in the meaning Individuality is lost in plurality/ for example, But, hat, plural 3ute. As the individuality of the single hat is lost in the mass of hats, so in German the positive vowel u, as the exponent of the individuality of the hat is modified in the notation of the mass of hats as a unit, by the addition of a vowel of negation, e* But the names of objects, which, al- though we may conceive them in a plural, from natural laws exist only one at a time or place, in their plural form retain their vowel unimpaired, that is, reject the umlaut. • Take, for instance, Mond, moon, in the sense of planet or satellite. We can speak of many planets or moons as a plural, but from the laws of space they can only exist one by one. So we say Mond, plural Monde, the character of the word continuing in the sound of the word. So, Tag, day. We can speak of a thousand days, but in these thousand days there is always but one day at a time. There can be no two days together as there are two or more hats. When one day is, the other has ceased to be or has not yet come, so we say: Tag, plural Tage. So the word Thron, throne, the seat of a king; plural " Throne," without the umlaut. A political earthquake may, by shak- ing the kings off", change their seats into chairs, which then as chairs, take the umlaut, Stuhl, Stiihle, but as long as they are " thrones," seats of kings, emblems of sovereignty vested in one, they preserve their separate individu- ality. So we say Thron, plural Throne. In such feminine words, however, as in * Strictly " insertion " of e (j), into the u. THE "wrought" language. 247 the singular are generic and general, and represent the idea of mass, the um- laut is employed in the plural to negate and destroy the generality, and thereby create individuality. So Kunst, Art, plu- ral Kiinste. Art is general ; Arts are in- dividual : — so we use the umlaut. Arts are gained from art by a process of division; hats from hat by a process of multiplication. The Umlaut, then, as we see it here, is simply negation, of what IS, like the pull of the bell in the case of a street car. If the car has stopped, the pull means go ; when it goes, the pull means stop. So the um- laut applied to words, in the case of genders of opposite meaning, produces opposite effects. Applied to masculine and neuter words, the character of which is individuality, it negates and destroys individuality, and creates gen- erality; applied to feminine words, such as are generic in their meaning in the singular, it negates and destroys gener- ality and creates individuality. And the same is true in all forms of its action throughout the German gram- mar. Having seen in German what the vowels mean in their contrast, I asked myself, what do they mean in their relation, as vowels of the same line, that is, how do the a, o, u, on the one line refer to each other, and similarly how are the a, e, i on the other line related. A special and superior field for examination of such relationship was aiforded by the Latin verb, where the vowels of the subjective line, a, e, i, are employed as the connecting vowels of the verb, forming its main classes. This led, first, to the analysis of the actions expressed by the verb, and here I found that all actions expressed by one and the same class of verbs are as much of one and the same character as actions, as the verbs composing that class are of one and the same character as verbs, and that the connecting vowel of the verb, corresponds in its char- acter as a vowel with the character of the action expressed by the verb. But what are then these classes of action ? To arrive at this in the short- est way of illustration possible, let us analyze here the simple action to strikie so as to stun, the parts of which action, are: 1. The raising of the hand of A., 2. The moving of the hand of A. toward B., 3. The contact of the hand of A. with B., and • 4. The effect left on B., the first two of which we see on the side of the subject A., and may, there fore, call them phases of subject-nota- tion; and the last two we see on the side of the object B., and may, there- fore, call them phases of object-notation: finally, the character of each phase in its turn and order we may designate as follows : 1st Phase — Phase of impulse crea- ted; 2d Phase — Phase of motion directed, these two being phases of subject-nota- tion/ Sd Phase — Phase of contact effected, and Ath Phase — Phase oi effect left; these two being phases of object-notation. The character of the last of this series of phases, as the last phase in- tended, fixes the character of the whole action, to strike so as to stun, as an action of \he fourth order, or action of object-notation, effect left. But, if the party A., instead of going the full length of the phases with his intent of action, had stopped short in the third phase, then we would have an action of the third order, of contact effected — an action of object-notation; for instance here, to hit. And if he had stopped short in the second phase, with his intent of action, then we would have an action of that order, action of motion directed, but of subject-notation, for instance, simply to move hand or 248 THE "wrought" language. arm. And if the raising of the hand itself had been the action, for instance, to give a sign or warning by that mo- tion, then we would have an action of that order, an action of impulse created, and of subject-notation. So that we see : 1. In whatever phase the movement and intent of the action is arrested, the character of that phase fixes the char- acter of the whole action as an action of the character of that phase ; and 2. As ye have phases of subject-nota- tion and phases of object-notation, so we must have actions of subject-nota- tion and actions of object- notation; and 3. That all actions must partake of the character of one of these phases, because they are the only forms of rela- tion possible between subject and object in action. Actions must be either of impulse created, of motion directed, of contact effected, or of effect left, the first two kinds being actions of stibject-notation, the last two being actions of object- notation. Applying these phases of the idea of action to the action of lips and tongue in producing the voice, we find on the subjective line the " vowels of action," that is, each of the subjective vowels is an exponent of the character of a phase. — It would be too tedious a task to review the numerous Latin verbs, and show that their distribution among the four conjugations exactly corresponds with the character of the actions they express ; but there is one important ap- plication of the foregoing principles, which I now proceed to illustrate. In the case of verbs which are syn- onymous in meaning, if they belong to different conjugations, we can clearly and exactly distinguish the meanings by considering in each case the char- acter of the conjugation. Take, for in- stance, the synonymous verbs. 1, docere and erudire, to teach. 2, ardere, urere, to burn. 3, ligare, nectere, vincire, to bind. 4, lavare, lavere, to wash. Upon the following diagram Actions of SUBJECT-NOTATION 1. IMPULSE. Examples. (1) (2) (3) ligare (4) lavare 2. MOTION. docere ardere Actions of OBJECT-NOTATION. 3. EFFECT LEFT. emdire urere nectere lavere vmcire such of these words as belong to the first conjugation are placed in the first column, such, as belong to the second conjugation, in the second column, and so 'on. The headings show the character of action expressed by each conjugation in accordance with the principles al- ready announced. At a glance, the dif- ference of meaning between these syn- onyms, now becomes apparent. Thus, (1.) Docere, to teach, action of 2d class, motion directed, subject-not&tian, is to teach as far as the subject is con- cerned, motion of knowledge directed toward an object ; Erudire, to teach, to instruct, action of 4th class, of effect left, object-nota.- tion, is to teach as far as the object is- concerned, effect left by teaching on the object, party taught. (2.) Ardere, 2d class, to burn, is to burn as far as the subject is concerned, motion of fire, "flame," directed to- ward an object; the name of the act of setting fire, as a crime, concerning as such a crime the subject, is in English, therefore, derived from ardere, arson ; Urere, 3d class, to burn, is to burn as far as the object is concerned, effect of contact, of fire, with the thing burn- ing. The name of that effect, concern- ing as such the object, is in English, therefore,derived from viTeie.,combustion. (3.) Ligare, to bind, 1st class, im- pulse created, ««6/ec<-notation, is to bind aa far as the subject is con- THE "wrought" language. 248 cemed: Impulse, attitude of binding. "Ligabamus in agro," says, therefore, Joseph ; Neetere, 3d class, effect of contact, ob- /eci-notation, is to bind as far as the object is concerned, effect of contact, of binding, with the object, thing bound; Vincire, to bind, 4th class, effect left, oJ;ec<-notation, is to bind as far as the object is concerned, effect left by bind- ing, or to leave bound, and so forth. In Greek, the character of these classes of verbs is found in the " con- tract" verbs. Let us now consider, "By what general quality the pronunciation of English differs from that of any other language." I would say, that whilst all other languages are cast languages, that is, languages where each element of pro- nunciation is sounded separately, Eng- lish is a wrought language, that is, the elements of pronunciation, under the grasp of that energy which is in- herent in the English character, are not sounded singly as elements, but together as a unit of sound. The first question that presents itself here, is, whence this energy, and in such an abundance as to be a national charac- teristic? Of course it has not grown naturally on the soil of Old England. There is usually as great a variety of growth, in the crops, on the mental soil of a people as there is on the natural soil, and no such intensity of growth and excess in one particular direction as fairly to absorb or change the other. This excess of energy then was not produced organically, as growth from one people ; it was brought about mechanically, by a conflux of people. Those that, from impulses of their own, followed the current of events tending westward, and came sword in hand to England, were not the lazy ones from home. They already represented, in the fact of their coming and leaving home, an " excess " of energy over that of those who remained. These energies collected, had on the island no outlet, no way of development, by absorption externally; so they had to develop themselves, by friction, internally, the result of which process was, that men lost those qualities in which they dif- fered, and maintained those in which they agreed. Thus, energy became the principal characteristic of the race. This energy, as shown in life, we call "Individuality;'" this individuality asserted ' for all, we call "Human Sights;" these human rights enacted in history, we call "Magna Charta." And the same energy that enacted "Magna Charta" gave to the language its big, capital "I," by which I mean the spelling of the personal pronoun of the first person singular with a capital, whilst the other pronouns have none, a feature occurring only in the English tongue. Having thus accounted for the pres- ence of this energy as a characteristic of the race, I shall proceed to show some of its effects upon the language. This big "I," then, or this con- centrated energy having first created walled homes — "every man's house his own castle" — created a walled language, fortified, at home, behind the teeth — as it is the common observance of all that study English in connection with French, that English is spoken more as if the party speaking would rather keep than issue this his bond, of speech, whilst French bodily, as in a raid, breaks through and rallies out- side of the " ramparts" — this in keep- ing with the directions of the two kinds of mind, the one homeward bound, the other outward and abroad. Again, the big "I," in vindication of its impulses, crushed the "genders." For, whilst in other languages the gender is a form of*relation in action, as, for instance, in German, where what is force is masculine, what is form is ;naL 250 the' "wrought'^ LANGUA9B. feminine, and what is neither is neuter, in English all things as devoid of -will, are neuter, except where, by some gen- eral or special act of grace, in life, or poetry, they are endowed with will, when the particular kind of supposed will as read in the action, fixes the kind of gender, then as its notation. A horse running away and overturning in its career a lamp-post may oe desig- . nated as a "he," though otherwise, un- der ordinary circumstances, it might appear in print as a "she," or an "it." The sun as the "ruler" of stars, thus, may be made masculine (though in German it is feminine), and the " moon," from the softness of its light, may be made feminine, "she" (though in German it is masculine, "he"). To confound gender and sex, and say that in English, "simply" there is gender where there is sex, were to confuse the language, if languages ever could be confused from waut of knowledge of their proper treatment, and to compel it to use, or introduce, "gender" deep down among the remotest things of creation to the lowest plants and an- imals, of which the language denies gender, although they certainly possess sex. Again, the big "I," in defence of its motion, broke up the sentences. For whilst in other, transmitted and mon- archical, tongues the place of the part is fixed by the idea of the whole, in republican English the form of the whole is dependent upon the movements of the parts. The English, simple, "rcT publican" sentence: (1) I shall recon- sider the matter, (2) after having read the letters (3) which I have received, changed into a monarchical or military form, as in German, reads thus : (1) I shall the matter, (2) after I the letters (3) which I received (2) read have, (1) once more consider. And last, to prove its effects, this "capital" I, in its efibrts of pronun- ciation, CRUSHED THE WORDS; that is, the elements, as has been said, are not sounded singly, but are changed under the grasp of mind into a unit of sound, the \yord. Take an example : here is the word "Sir." Put these letters before any people that ever lived, and see whether in pronouncing they will get what you get. They will pronounce the s, the i, the r. Whatever they may get, they will never get your sound. Why? Theirs are cast languages. They pro- nounce the individual letters. Their sound of the word would be the sum of the sound of the letters, not their product, as in English. But now put these letters sir under the rollers of mind, sound them not as in a cast language, but as in a wrought lan- guage, and what happens? The liquid strong r is driven through the trans- parent feeble i; the word is sounded as if spelled SV. Now, put tins before any people that ever lived, and see whether, when they sound it, it will be anything but your English Sir, the vowel sound supposed to exist here as an independent sound, being but the clash of the consonants in the energy of the pronunciation of the word as a unit. So it makes no material diflference whether we have Sir, bird, turn, beard, work, herd, worth, her, or burn, all have the same sound, the same cause, producing the same efiFect, a language, cast in its spelling for the eye, being changed for the ear, into a language "wrought." You will now see, that in English pronunciation everything depends; Firstly, upon the character of the let- THE "wrought" language. 251 ters, and not only upon their individual but also upon their social qualities, as in a wrought language a letter which might get along very well with another, might not get along at all with a third, or might show as neighbor of one let- ter qualities different from those it shows as the neighbor of another: and further, not only upon their open and obvious, but also upon their hidden or recondite qualities. Take for instance the sound of "all" in English. Whence this touch of an o sound in all? I found that the vocal element in the sound of the liquid letters corresponds in the case of each liquid to one particular vowel sound. In the case of the I this is 0. This "o" in the case of two I's, or an 1 backed by a consonant, able to resist the loss of sound, in a wrought language is evolved in suflScient force or volume to be slightly audible, so that the letters all are pronounced as if spelled with the part of an "o," which " o " sound, as a representative of the word "all," is maintained where all is meant, as in "always;" though spelled with but a single 1. Secondly, upon the degree of energy of pronunciation involved, which may change with the meaning, use, or der- ivation of the word or its combination with other words or parts of words, etc., etc. Take, as an example, the word court, pronounced court when meaning the thing court itself, pronounced shorter in court'ier, when meaning court, not for its own sake, but as the notation of the character or office of a party living at court ; and pronounced very short in coMr^'eous, when not court as form, but court as force is meant, meaning, in general, civil, and in the manner of courts, whether inside or outside of the thing court itself. And Thirdly, on the fact that in English a letter does not spend its force on its place in the word, but that the mode of uttering one particular letter may affect all the others, as in a piece of wrought iron every part of the mass affects every other part (whilst in cast iron the force of every part is spent in its place as a part), so that in English a letter at the beginning may affect the pronunciation of a letter even at the end. The details of all this belong to the course. But enough has been said to show that English is a language unique in itself, that it has not its like, and probably never will have, as the con- ditions which produced it are not likely to occur again; that it swings as a language on its own axis, can be cut like diamond only by its own dust, measured as a language only by its own laws; how it must baffle and deride any efforts to catch it with "classical" rules, not made for English: how it will slip through here like an eel, or dash through there like a whale ; how truly cosmopolitan this language is in its power of naturalization of words by simply "stamping" them, and indelibly thereby changing their character ; that every English word has more specific gravity than a word of any other lan- guage, because in a smaller compass of sound it holds a greater meaning ; and finally, that this "English" tongue re- sembles more than any other known language that kind of speech of which the poet says : " Wie ein Engel moolit' ich sein, Ohne Korpershranke, Deren Unterredung ein Tonender Gedanke." " Like an angel I would be With these fleshly bonds unbound: In communings heavenly — Every thought a tuneful sound I " 9 V I, The Verb complete in the VOICES. ACTIVE. MIDDLE. PASSIVE. II. The Voices complete in the TENSES. TENSES. (Indlcatire Mode, 1 Sing.). ACTIVE. MIDDLE. PASSIVE. Pres. Imperf. Perf. 1. Plup'f. 1. Perf. 2. Plup'f. 2. "blank"' tfs- -ov like Passive a eiv "} i -oiiat -OflYlV -(/.ai, Fut. 1. Aor. 1. Fut. 2. Aor, 2. Fut. 3 (Perf.) (0 a -ov -. ofiau -. dfiriv -ovfiai ■^ t." -ao(iat * Like Perf. 1 and Plup'f. 1 respectively, only that the stem usually is short- ened and the radical vowel changed, commonly into o. Notes. — t; sign of reduplication. The dash in the tables, means the st^n. The dots in front or after the dash, indicate the Tense signs: Ex. Aor. 1, Middle . . d/ajv = i [blank] a J d/iTjv. The stem, as far as the placing of the Accent — in some cases nere on Augment or Beduplication — is concerned, is understood as a monosyllable. Accent, where not noted otherwise, on stem. KEYS: Or, the origin and meaning of the Conjugations— Classes of Verbs — illustrated and explained. ECONOMY OF VERB: 1. Redundancy of Forms. 2. FaralleliBm of Forms. 3. Derivation of Verbs. 4. Composition of Terb. 6. Changes by Composition : CONJUGATIONS. I. 11. TTT. IV. V V cresc t (grow) s j f i • u 1 ! 1 P s ■ lX aug ct (increase) Rednpl. • Lengthening of Stem Vowel No Change. - Changes other than the above. d find 86 (cleave) No Perfect. , Perfect Deponent Neutr. Pass. Inverted; Neutral. Pass. ' Irregular Verbs. Defective Verbs. Impersonal Verbs. tkf in Preposition, b, in Verb. Act. l.-at 2. -it S-w-t 4.-it Put. . Pass. zu. t. n. i aea ^ urua, a, um i ae a III., (Supine in. order to . , to be . . d having been . . d lPerf.Part. ' ' ' / Fat. Inf. to be about to be . . d Fat. P. aboat to , . ApTpendlK (to 1st group.) \ one tbat mnst be . . d Fat. P. i-Geniiid from, by res.; P. of. of. . ing to " ■ . ing . '•'a Sa gPH l«^ J - re to** tor** to tor te tote mini nto ntor 2d Sing. ImperaJ^plnr 3d " |lrf>n ^^.^, aSL j^Z.-^^^ ^^_ ^^.^^ «r- _,. L— ■^^r^-r*-*-*-*--^^^- 't^-x,^ ■^tC-g-^-^t^-^^ •*^~'f-r*.'^-^^nuuon) Noun (Sing.) Uom. who? Gen. whose ? J)at. I^to] yihtn ' Acq. who»n ? Sina. m. n. f. I (Endings of) Definite Article. s s m n[ s PlwxU, for all. r I n luniverscd] . .e Stem, de-; Spec, change before — c, die ; before neuter s (Nom. and Aoo.) das. DECLINED like Bff. Art., as to tbe endings: 1) Sdai. & Bern. Pron., dies-er, e, es, etc. 2) Indef. & Possets, Pron., ein (f. — e), kein, mein, dein. etc. (Aisohde: ein-er, e, es, etc.) 3) Adjective, in the place of the Def. Article. Ace, fem. & n., by rule, like Nom. B. CONJUGATION. 1. "VERBS". Teniv forms: Pres. Inf. Jmperf. Past Part. Pres. Ind. Imperf. Past Part. a. Classes ofVerbs: 1- REGULAR. (Conson. outside.) 2. IRREGULAR. (Vocal change, inside.) live : leh-en — d: — te — d: ge — t sing : stng-e« sang: sang sung: ge-sung-en 3. Both Changes: . . can kann . . could. konn-te ge-konn-t b. Endings: 1. GENERAL. Sing. 1— I 2-St [e«. Impert-e] 1 3— Plur. 1 — en 2—et 3 — en 2. SPECIAL Pres. Ind. -t [engl.:— a] Pres. Inf.-en Pres.Part.-eni 1. S. Pres.-e c. Subjunctive, takes e immediately after the stem if there was not one there, in the Indicative ; Irreg. verbs in Imperf. also change (modify) vowel, of Indicative. Verbs of Both cJumges, that share in the latter, refuse the former (the-e-) (konn-te, Subj. kpnn-te). Special changes additional, to those noted in the "Subjunctive": "Second •change," otiireg. Verbs [sprech-e, Bprich-«<, etc] ; "Local change", or the ■dropping of the "ge-" of Past Part., in all kinds of Verbs under certain circum- stances ; Euphonic change, depending for its kind, upon the kind of the verb ; mostly, use of euphonic e between d and t. 2. THE AUXILIARY VERBS (Forms irregular). hab-en sein werdr-eA ' TTse of "werde". (lo have) (tnbe) (to become) I become, am going to he Prea, Ind. Sing. 1. bin to strike ' struck, or, bav- 2. ha-st bist wirst ( A OT. ) ^ ing been struck 3. ha-t ist wird (P.P.,PA8SITE) Pk I. . . sind Future Act. Pres. Pass. 2. . . seid I shall strike. I am (Imp. was) 3. . sind being struck. Jmperf. Ind. . hatte war ward, wurde 3* wcrbt f*la» 3^ wcrbe (tuart '• Subj. . hatte ware wiirde gen. or wurbe) ge- last Part ■ . gewesen worden(-|e..«'',) f($Iii3en. l>re3. Inf. • • sein "I should have been loved" Imperat. A Pres. Subj. lerf. Pluperf , etc. . • • sei I should II loved become be.. 3d) reiirbe geliefit Jootben f«in. ■ Auxiliary: to be. — 44 — 4. In Gender, in this, that vhilst in English all things are nea- ter, " it's," as being void of will, in German, what is force, is mas- culine; what is /orm, is feminine; and what is neither of these, is neater. So chair, Stuhl, is masculine, force, as support ; so hat, sloak, shoe, boot, are masculine, force, as -protection ; so will is mas- culine, force, as direction ; so looking-glass is masculine, force, as reflection. " Bench," however, the original element in the idea of which is not force of support, but form as hold, plurality of chairs or supports, is feminine. And sofa, the idea of which as sofa, is neither force as support, nor form as hold, bat the modification of the action of either, in the cushions, passive, is : neuter, sofa, das Sofa. Here they are : the arrows mean force. 1. Der Stuhl, masc./oree, the chair: torce,BiB gravitation ; force, as cliair : force against force, der Stuhl^ masculine, the chair. 2. The bench, feminine : brm as hold, a plurality of chairs, of supports, the bench die Banky feminine ; and, 3. The sofa : As cushions, being passive, as rest, comfort, neuter, Der Stuhl, die Bank, das Sofa. 47 — From this combination or association of force and form, in the idea o: the feminine, it follows that Instruments are feminine. What is an instrument ? A combination for mechanics ends, of /orce &nd form; a force to be modified in its action hy form A clock is an instrument. Where is the force ? Tlie weight or th springs. Where is the form ? The wheels. Wliere are the ends ? Th regulated motion of the hands. That they move at all is due to forct in the clock ; that they move regulated is due to form. We see, here force and form combined, form modifying force by regulating it. A cloci therefore, is an instrument made to modify action by regulating it. Here is the saw, an instrument made to modify action, how ? B; multiplying it. Where is the /orce ? The blade, the stroke. Where i the form ? The teeth of the saw. Where are the ends ? The cuts ; tha is, the one stroke multiplied into the number of the teeth of the sa\i Instead of making one cut, by one stroke, the saw makes as many singl cuts as there are teeth. A saw is an instrument made to modify actio by multiplying it. Here is a staircase, an instrument, here, of ascent. Where is th force? The ascent. Where is the form? The single wooden steps dividing force, as ascent. A staircase is an instrument of ascent, mad( to modify action by dividing it. Instead of one long step oi leap we make many small steps, one at a time. So it divides the force. And what is the difference in kind., that is, "genus" between these clock, saw, staircase ? None, except the difference in the verbs defin ing their action : to regulate, to multiply, to divide. Here they are : 1. CTocA, "instrument," 2. Saw, "instrument," 3. Staircase, "instrument," made /o modify ac- made to modify ac- made to modify action by tion by "regulating" tion by ^'multiply- ^'dividing" it. it. ing" it. Ubr, clock, " die VhT," fern. e, saw, "die Sage," /S7». Treppe, staircase, •' die Treppe, fem. 98 II. PRONUNCIATION. BLACKBOARD (Cut): The Little Drop, First, oral, from picture, in Eng- lish; Then, oral Ger- rtian; Then, read. Teacher. ( Little drop . must . to the . earth . fall \ Trop^ein - musz - zur - Erde — fallen, S£i%Petn XMX% gur (1) (£rbe fatten, Teacher. Must the delicate little flower moisten; Musz das zarte Bliimohen netzen; Blumchen - netzen 9Jiu§ bag garte (2) S3 1 it m c^ e n nc^cn ; Teacher. Must with springs further flow, Musz mit Quellen welter wallen, welter . wallen, 2)iuf mit Quellen (3) tceiter iDaflen, Teacher. Must the little fish also delight, Musz das Fischlein auch ergotzen, auch - eigotzen, Musz - das - Fischlein — auch — ergotzen, SWup bag Stfi^letn (4) auc^ crgC^en, Teacher. Must in the brook the mill heat, Musz im Bach die Miihle schlagen, Miihle - schlagen, Miih-le schla-gen, 2)^up tm a3ad& bie (5} 5I«u|le ft^lagen, . Teacher. Must in the river the ships carry; Musz im Flusz die Schiffe tragen die Schiffe tragen ; ajiuf im ?5l«f bie (6) ©d^iffe tragen; Teacher. And where remained then the seas, Und wo blieben denn die Meere denn - die - Meere, Unb wo Wieben benn bie (7) Tie eve, Teacher. If not first the little drop were. Wenn nicht erst das Tropflein ware. 2Benn nid^t erft bag 1. StrC^jflein tuave. Read: todve, Siopftein, TliWt, S3Iumi^en. — Sound: d, p, u; «*. Read: Sro^jflein, fallen, erbe, 83Iflm(^en, SWfl^Ie, mit6, SKeere, fctflaflen, 93ad^, Duelte, glug, tragen, bitcien, bie (ie = ee); gildjlcin, Jociter (ei = i), ttatten, wo, ctgBljen. Say the „S£r8))f(ein" by heart, first with the picture, then without. SEroljfen (drop), S r B ^ { tctn: spacing letters, German mode of italicizing. 147 S. (springs) Quelcn bei Soni fl,. 23ac^, 23 a d^ bie 155 Compare: <>D t B, and •v3» V; the first has two chambers, the latter but one. Compare: vC» N, and i/V» R- The one is open, all through, the other is divided. Compare, the JJ\,f M, and the r^JJ m W, Notice the wavelike motions and bend of lines, in the SDB, connected, and flowing as it were, one into the other; compare with this the stiffer forms of the SDJ, open, not closed all through, like the SB. Distinguish: % % ^, W, 3B, ^. Again: % S?, % % ^, 9}^, % % SB. The same, in smaller type : 9?, ^, 3?^ 9^, ^f 2B^ '^f ^* Still smaller: Sa(|, Stum^en, SBogel (bird), SaUr (father), SRad^t (night), 3flec^t (right), SSSagen (wagon), SWftgen (stomach). And smaller still : 2», SR, SB, SB, 3t, SR, 3J, iR, 8, S, SJ. Basis, English, curve German, aagle a, ^, c, . . a, b, c, b, e, . . 1. o. ©aa Xropflein fadt. ©aa Iroijflein fattt jur Srbc : 156 5. „» a e^»" Cttt !Bad) itt Slrttlt— The Brook of Labour.V Der 99ad) tier Srteit treibt bie SDiiible bei (Sefiitiii^i. (The brook of laboui drives the mill of speech, in conTeisation.) (Sacks of grain, "Words,', waiting outside, for the work of the mill.) ■^roipflein mug jur @rbe fatten — little drop must to the earth fall S)ae IriJpflein ijl runt (is round). S)ie Srbe ift runt). ■Die Srbe ifl runb. X)a« runbe (round) Sropflein. DicrunteSrbe. ''PROLOG IM HIMMEL." ■DIE DREl ERZENOEL TRETEN FOR, I. ^ap^ael. Die Sonne font nach alter Weise in Brudersphdren Wettgesang, Und ihre vorgeschrieb'ne Reise Vollendet sie mit Donnergang. Ihr Anblick giebt den Engeln Starke, Wenn keiner sie ergrunden mag ; Die unhegreiflich hohen Werke Sind herrlieh wie am ersten Tag.* Unb f(^ncll unb unfiegrciflic^ f(ftnelle ©rc^t H(^ um^er bet Srbe ^Jrodjt} di mecfefcit 5>arabtefc«=J^eIIc 9Jlit tiefer, fc^auenooUet 9la(^t; • The first four lines, indeed the fli-st two lines, already introduce and fix the idea of the universe, in its fullness and completeness, both, as to time and space ; in its harmony, dependence, and perfect trust. How? Analyze them. Note 3. The poet first starts upon drawing effects and these in their fullest extent: the sun in motion, with other suns. ("Tont," allusion to the "Har- mony of the Spheres"). Then, passing to the earth, first to the motions of th© earth, itself, then the great and obvious natural motions on its surface, he- gradually, by this process of descent and individualization, brings his description "lose to man, whose sphere he points at and leaves at tlie same time in " tfie clasp ■ of thunder." At that same moment, and with the disappearance of these kinds of effects which, as such, are beyond man's sphere of action, the impulse discloses itself; Vie material world makes room for a spiritual, the unit of the world hitherto presented as a physical unit, ohano;es into a moral unit, maintained as such, as it is understood, by the "messengers of the Lord." 8 • LIST OF PUBLICATIONS Belonging to and Representing the American System of Teaching. CHARLES, BROTHER & CO, PHILADELPHIA, PUBLISHERS. l.-BOSTON EARTHQUAKES. (Lectures and Monographs.) a.— HAMLET.— Essay, with Diagram. An Earthquake of Critic ar Criticisms. ?).— UMLAUT, Centennial Sketch. Origin and Meaning of tl Vowels. Explanation of the instances of the application of tl " Umlaut " in German. c— THE KEYS TO EOME.— Origin and Meaning of the Conjugatioi of the Latin Verb ; Discovery of the Laios of Action. ^S~ The great Essay that has dumbfounded the Royal Academy of Sciences, Berii Prussia. d.— THE GREAT INTRODUCTORY.-This being the Introductoi to German, but at the same time the General Introductory to a courses : Greek, Latin, French. Lines into English. ^S- All these, b, c, d, with Diagrams. e.— THE FRENCH VERB (Four Regular Con.tugations an THE Two Auxiliaries), printed in full directly from type on U. S. Postage Stamp; partial copy of "27ie French Verb Total, chart endorsed by Victor Hugo ; enlarged, with Text. The French Verb with this Chart is taught by the author in Ten Minutes. 2. — BOOKS, WITH Charts, and Charts Proper, with Text. a.— GERMAN BY STEAM. I. High School Manual, formerly High School Primer. Thrj books in one (Gramwiar proper. Child's Story Book, with Di( tionary, and Reader for Adults). Third Revised Edition, 251 pi All the puzzles In German, Gender, Style, Umlaut, Philosophy of the Formi tion of the Plural in German Nouns, e#cplained; with Diagrams. "The Great Introductory" forms part of this book. II. Analytical Chart.— (Diagrams of Grammar, with Explanf tory Text, and Parsing of Texts of Beading Matter, by means c lAnes.) This Chart is the main Contents of the above book abridged, and is valnabl as a chart even for those who have the book. 6.-GREEK BY STEAM.— Diagrams with Text. c.-LATIN. I. Latin by Steam.— Charts with Text. II. Latin.— TAe Verb, The Regular Verb. Charts with Text. Par of the above, sold extra. d.— FEENCH. I. French (the main parts of French— Pronunciation, Etymology, Verb in full, Syntax) by Steam. Charts with Text. II. "The Feench Verb Total."— Chart endorsed by Victor Hugo ; with Explanatory Text. Size of Chart, 33 x 34 inches. y^' The Explanatory Text of the Verb in the case of either Chart or Charts, is the same as that used with the Chart of the Verb as printed on the "Postage Stamp." e.— ENGLISH BY STEAM— in preparation. 3.— GLEANINGS. a.— FEEE TRADE, and PROTECTION.— Questions, decided on Logic ; Lecture. 6.— "SQUARE INCH."— This being the Paradigms of the Latin Verb, eleven verbs— thirty pages in Andrew's First Lessons— simplified so that the whole of them, with room to spare, is printed in full directly from type on the space of one inch square. Both, original size, and enlarged. The copy enlarged, is the Chart used for instruction in the subject of the Verb, in the book (see above). Square inch as such alone, of no use except with those who have the book. The Explanatory Text of Charts is printed from type. Diagrams or Charts, taking all as one whole, are partly printed from type, partly autograph, or photo-lithograph or photo- type print-work. Of these works, none are without some beginning, at this date, Aug., '83. Persons who may wish copies, please send word, and as soon as the books are out they will be informed. Address Prof. C. C. Schaeffer, 125 N. 17th St., Philadelphia, Pa., or order through Trade. Note. — " The Philadelphia Dorfzeitwng " is a news sheet published or intended to be published in a free or unrestrained issue of numbers, to give in its supplements the latest and most important discoveries and inventions, in the contents of Prof. Schaeffer' s New Sys- tem. This present publication is a supplement to its first number, appearing before this first number itself and intended to open the way for it, and so for the issuing within the space of about six months' time, in the shape of supplements to the paper, of the whole of the System. Orders may be sent for the paper, or a special supplement. The supplements are sold extra, by themselves, and of the paper, only the single numbers as they may come out. The contents of the paper are devoted to the interests of the System, and of Education in general. The price of a single number of the paper is ten cents, and the price of a sup- plement varying from twenty cents to $2. Each supplement is a whole or a unit of the subject treated in itself, .either as a language or any other subject. Charts or Diagrams accompany the supplements. Address for either paperor supplement, Prof. C. C. Schaefifer, 125 N. 17th St., Philadelphia, Pa. THE GREAT BOSTON DIAGRAM, EXPLAINING THE SYSTEM. The following diagram drawn in explanation of the systen it having pleased our friends in Boston, we give here as it ma please others, too, and may help theiii to understand as regard the system what otherwise they could realize only wit difficulty. A B is the segment of a circle. On the line of this segmen lie the, we will say, sixteen pages of Fasquelle's French Gram mar, of the Paradigms of the Four Regular Conjugations witi Auxiliaries, printed in full. The teaching of the facts of these Paradigms cannot wel be reduced in time, if they are taught as ready facts, it onlj may be changed as time of teaching ; instead of being learned al in one strain, they may be distributed among other matter, oi mixed with that matter in systems designed specially for prao tice, but they have, as facts, to be learned some time, anyhow The time to learn them straight through may require six days, six weeks, six months or sixteen months, according to the kind of pupil or teachei;. And then, their knowledge hangs simplj suspended on memory, and when applied in reading or foi speaking, as a guide for the treatment of other similar verbs,, greatly fails by being not fixed, that is, not based on a knowledge of the elements which underlie the forms, and which would help in the treatment of other verbs of the same kind. We do not teach these facts as of Paradigms at all, we changed the subject to he taught ; that is the key to the teaching in an incredibly short time. We teach the principles which underlie those facts, making the iymer cut, seen in the Diagram, as C D, and making this in the case of the French Verb as above, our- selves with chart large enough to see it readily, in three times five minutes, going three times over the subject, instead of once in ten minutes — ^so that the student needs no further teaching, but only practice by himself of what he knows. And so in Greek, German, and Latin. These principles are not the facts; what you use for practice are the facts, not the principles, but you make these facts yourselves,' from the principles. The Dia- gram, we think, fairly shows the merits of each line. It took THIRTY years to dig down from the line of facts ta the line of principles, in these four languages, German, Latin^ Greek, French, the time spent in these all" counted as one. Students led on that inner line of principles, were prepared! in twelve lessons in each, German, Latinj Greek, to prepare themselves, in a few months, of reading, to enter Harvard and other colleges, without having had any previous knowledge of the subjects. The same simplification which effects these wonders in Ett/r mology, works still greater ones in Syntax. This system is the system of future studies in these lan- guages — English, if we succeed, may be included. We con- fess that we should like to see its efforts and efficiency supple- mented by other systems, in living tongues by the so called oral systems, but only as trains are by hacks. We, ourselves, keep such lines of assistance connected with our Depots. The above diagram explaining the systems, seems very insignifi- cant in itself, as lines, yet it is the most sweeping of the system, as it explains not parts, or mere contents of the systems, but the systems themselves, including all their contents, that is, the mode of treatment in each, of all the material that belongs to them. It gives a good idea of the lucidity and teaching-force of other Diagrams employed in the system. CURIOSITY SHOP. PAPERS : Here are some of them. As the public did not want them with the names, we give them without them: Divinity School, , December 23d, 1868. "At the close of a series of lectures de- livered by Prof. C. C. Schaeffer before the First Class in this Institution, it gives me great pleasure to make the following statement of simple facts, going to establish the practical value of a system whose scientific beauty and consis- tency must appear plain on inspection. The class had reached, in Latin, the Verb, but had not begun its study. At this point the Professor took them, ■and in eight lessons he had familiarized them with the system of Latin inflec- tions—verbs, adjectives, and nouns— to a degree which surprised and delighted me. I now consider them capable, in point of familiarity with the inflections •of reading a simple Latin author. In Greek, although the close of the term forbade the completion of the course, the results were even more striking. It is difficult to express my gratification at this result. I must say, however, that as a remarkable economy of toil, as a philosophic yet lucid exposition of its subject-matter, I look on this system as one meriting universal support and adoption. , Head of Preparatory Department." Here is a paper from ■one of the late Presidents of Girard College : August 13th, 1866. " So complete •und concise a conspectus of the whole structure of the language is displayed, and rendered easy of mastery, that in order to possess the whole field of Latin literature, very little labor is required beyond that necessary for the acquisition of the vocabulary. , President." The next (from 1870) is a curi- osity in itself. " The undersigned, in order to aid his system in Latin, abkoad, and with the view (ultimately) to organize schools on the plan of the ' Kin- DERGAKTEN ' (German Infant School), will sell Five Hundred Course Tickets for a series of German Courses (two months courses each) extending over three years, each single course complete, as a course of instruction, jret each ticket admitting to bach and all of these courses— at the rate of $6.00 each ticket, if taken now. The foUo-wing offices and private gentlemen, have kindly volunteered to take charge of the sale, to a limited extent each, of these tickets, at their respective counters or individually." Now follow^ six newspapers, among them North American and United States Ga- zette, and five names of prominent gentlemen of high standing in the com- munity. The advertisement went for three weeks, through the entire Philadel- phia Press. We got by it one pupil for these classes. Here are some Notes BY the papers : " It is a matter of astonishment that the system evolved by Professor Schaeffer has not attracted more universal attention. It is designed to revolutionize the threadbare and vexatious methods of classical teaching,, and it will do so. If it is not voluntarily recognized by those who ought to be appreciative and in the vanguard of academic teachers, circumstances are so. shaping themselves as to force its introduction. * * If the chart (Latin) be valuable as a specialty, it is more so when it becomes a part of a scheme for general classical instruction."— Forney's Press, Nov. 16, 1869. "The author claims that within the time of two hours any person familiar with the rudiments of English grammar, can learn the verb by heart from this chart (Latin) and the blank form published *with it. If this claim were ten times, what could be granted, what a saving of time would be effected ! If such a rate of speed in teaching be really attainable — and a mere glance at the chart suggests its possibility — it is evident that the classical studies can easily hold their place, and march side by side with the other branches of study in our modern and more practical schools. * * The author of the chart, Prof. Schaeffer (for many years connected with the University of Pennsylvania),, complains of the apathy with which his system has been received outside of Philadelphia by those who should be foremost in maintaining the classics irk their high position as part of a liberal education." — Daily Evening Bulle- tin, Jan. 10th, 1870. Here is one also concerning the Latin Chart which we take special pleasure in reprinting : " ' The Magic Chart." — "We have received from Charles, Brother & Co., Philadelphia, Professor C. C. Schaefler's ' Magic Chart ' for the teaching of the Latin Verb, and if by magic is meant the reduction of a difficult and intricate process to one at once clear and concise, we think the term is well merited. All that the chart con- tains may easily be learned by heart by any pupil of ordinary intelligence in two or three hours, and once having done this, he knows all that can be taught concerning the Latin regular verb. The system is entirely new, and has met ' Former title of Chart of the Latin Beg. Verb. with the most astonishing success wherever it has been introduced^ and its merits are so apparent that it is only necessary for it to become better known to be universally adopted. , How much time and study Prof. SchaefEer has de- voted to the subject it is hard to -say, but we should judge many years must have been spent in ceaseless study to have brought it to its present perfection of simplicity."— Geo. W. Childs' Am. Lit. Gaz. and Pub. Cieculak, Nov. 15th, 1869. Here is a paper from a State Superintendent of Schools: " Your charts came and I was so busy I had not time even to thank you. I have not been able to examine them yet, nor do I deem myself competent to pronounce judgment upon them. Apply to some of our learned professors who are at work in that line, I will accept their opinion." And when I sent the charts and book to one of our "learned professors," see what the learned pro-, fessor says : " I thank you very much for the beautiful chart of the Latin Verb which you have been kind enough to send me. As it is now twenty-five years since I had anything to do with teaching the elements of Latin, I feel hardly competent to judge of its value as a means of instruction."— Senior Professor of Greek, in, I do not want to say what Eastern College, but one of the very, very first ones, and forgot, it seems, his Latin, etc., etc. ROLL Of HONOUR. CoNTRiBiTTiONS, from friends from 1857 — 1883, given approximately $5,000 Cash, applied 10,000 Stealings (money borrowed from friends and not returned yet) 5,000 Professor's Work, 30 years, 15 hours per day, at principals' rates, viz. : 5 hours a day for 6 days a week, counting 6 to balance overwork on other days and including holidays as work, at a salary say of only |1500 a year, yielding them |5 each working day, the work of the system including during the last years. Free Courses of Instruction in more than one-half of the 31 Sections of the Public Schools, Phila- delphia, to try and test the system, by permis- sion of the Board of Public Education 1 35,000 Total, money value invested ., $155,000 If the Board of Public Education, Philadelphia, will pay the INTEREST of this amount as a salary for me and aids, they may have the service of the system in these languages applied o' organized by me personally, for their schools. A city that pays 15 millions for an office place of its Public Business, can or ought to be able to afford to pay $8 or $10,- 000 a year to supply to such of its children in the Public Schools as may want it, instruction in either Germ.an, Latin, GreeJc or French, one or all of these in the case of a child, and this instruction, given, as it is given by the system, by Thanks to my friends^ as far as they stand forth in the above, and to the Board of Education. Only a minister can afford to be such a " fool " as I from all this, have proved to be. Address, Kev. Prof. C. C. Schaeffer, 125 K 17th St., Philadelphia. I should likely not have found the same support and kind of support, as kind support that is, support based solely on kindness, any- where else. All honour in this, to Philadelphia. But let us change it in some certain- things, to make it per- fect. I am. as my friends see, in for it. Let us see. The Author. i>4 ! JWtWW^i^K^ "^^^IrtBiW