-jiSpi Vfc2 A 55 Cotege of Architecture Library Cornell University Cornell University Library NB 163.V62A55 The Altoviti Aphrodite. 3 1924 020 506 493 m 'M Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924020506493 \y\v\i)\v^\v\y\v^\y\u\v\yyuyy\sj\ij^\v\i)\i)yi)^\y\y^^^^vj\u H E^A LTOVIT A f H ^ O D I T E* I PRIVATELY PIIINTED MCMXX COPYRIGHT 1920 BY WELLES BOSWORTH A 41 A ^ •% M A •;• w^^^ w V JT- •;• jr •!• j^ ^.» ir ^» FOREWORD THIS monograph on the Altoviti Aphrodite, which adorns the marble temple in the gardens of Mr. John D. Rockefeller at his country seat "Kijkuit" on the Hudson, has been compiled and edited from information and notes furnished by Mr. Charles de Kay of New York City, who was the first to point out the artistic merit of the Aphrodite and through whose efforts the statue was brought to the attention of critics in Europe and America. Welles Bosworth. THE APHRODITE IN THE MARBLE TEMPLE AT "KIJKUIT" THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE TWO statues had long stood^ how long we do not know, in the courtyard^of the^ famous j^^^^ Mggatv ^Alt oviti on the Borgo d'Albizzi in Flor- ence. One of them, the Aphrodite which is the subject of this monograph, was esteemed by its owner as of little worth, while the other, attributed to Jan di Bologna, was highly prized. In 1892 Signor Gustavo Volterra, a dealer in antiques, walking down the street, noticed the two statues through the carriage archway. The Aphrodite stood at the rear of the courtyard against a stable wall, which had been decorated with frescoed fruits and flowers as a background by some sympathetic person who may have dimly realized the statue's beauty through the many coats of thick, rough paint with which it had long before been ignorantly and thoughtlessly covered. Signor .Volterra bought the statue for an insignificant sum, for neither he nor its owner, the Marchesa Matteucci, a descendant of the Montalvos, had a true appreciation of its beauty and value. With soap and water he removed the covering of paint from its surface. The Director of the Uffizi Gallery now wished to buy the statue, but for so low a sum that Signor Volterra, declining the offer, sent the marble to London. Thereupon it came into the posses- THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE ii sion of Mr. Frederick Linton, who subsequently brought it to New York City with a collection of old paintings. At that time the National Arts Club, then on West Thirty-fourth Street, was arranging a loan exhibition of old paintings. Hearing that there might be some objects worth exhibiting in Mr. Linton's collection, Mr. Charles de Kay went with him to the warehouse in which they were stored and after looking over the canvases learned that he possessed an old marble which some connoisseurs had pronounced a veritable antique. Mr. de Kay thus describes the impression the statue made upon him: "A glance at the figure made me think it was an old copy of the Medici Venus at Florence, but when the dim light gave place to full daylight I was immediately impressed by its extraordinary beauty. On examination I found that its arms, unlike the Medici's, were an integral part of the marble. It also had a base, which bore marks of extreme antiquity; then, one of its hands, the. right hand lightly touching the left breast, had upon it the remains of a strap decorated with reliefs to represent gold studs, bosses and cabuchon jewels, absolutely unknown to any of the marble statues of Venus which have come down to us. Aside then from the exquisite beauty of the face and figure, aside from the extraordinary perfection of the dolphin which rears itself as a support beside the legs, here was a statue which could not have been derived from any origmarsa far, discovered, and least of all from the"Venus de Medici. Rather would it be mo£e reasonable to believe that here was the qj-iglnal by Praxit- eles from which Kleomeries of Athens made the iamous Venus de Medici about 250 b. c, a century later." Mr. Linton did not appreciate the value of his possession. Indeed, he had prized it so little that in 1893 he sent it by THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE 15 freight to the World's Columbian Exposition at Chicago, consigned to the Greek Department. The statue arrived long after the exhibition had opened. Hearing nothing of his loan, Mr. Linton requested a relative who was about to visit Chicago to inquire at the Greek Department whether it had arrived. There was no such department and the investigator by the merest chance learned that in the Japa- nese section there was an unaccounted-for case containing a marble statue. This proved to be the Aphrodite. Later Mr. de Kay arranged to have the statue exhibited by th^ National Arts Club, and published an article in the JSTeWT'dr^ Time ly of jwhich. he was art critic, attributing the statue- to_Praxiteles. Considerable controversy and great public interest followed this publication. Throngs of art lovers came again and again to see the Aphrodite. Flowers were laid at its feet and poets were moved to verse. The late John La Farge suggested that it might be the work of Skopas. The Sunday papers dedicated special supple- ments to the subject. New York was enjoying a veritable art sensation. Meanwhile it became known that the statue might be purchased, though for reasons of his own the owner would not at that time divulge where he had obtained it. Those disposed to recommend its purchase to private or public galleries were naturally mystified and made skeptical by this attitude. Had Mr. Linton frankly given the name of the dealer in Florence who had discovered the statue in the Palazzo Altoviti these suspicions would have been allayed. In 1908 the Aphrodite became the property of two Eng- THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE 17 lish gentlemen. Sir Algernon Firth, Bart, and Mr. William Henry Aykroyd, who took it to London. At their request Mr. de Kay showed it to various artists, archaeologists and connoisseurs in order to procure their opinion of its origin. Professor. Xanteri of the South Kensington Schools con- firmed Mr. deKay'5. opinion that the statue was the work of the same hand which had modeled the Hermes at By special favor the statue was then placed in the British Museum beside a cast of the Medici Venus, in order that the differences between them might be readily observed. Many authorities agreed that the Montalvo-Altoviti might be the orj^inal^Jram^which "Kleomenes," if the name on the plinth can be accepted, had copied the Medici. The British owners, now wishing to ascertain the judg- ment of French authorities, sent the Aphrodite to Paris where several archaeologists came to view it. Auguste Rodin was profoundly stirred by its beauty, but, protesting that he was not an archaeologist, declined to decide on its age or its authorship. Others were more explicit. M. Pottier, head of the department of antique terra cottas of the Louvre, thought it belonged to the first century before Christ; none considered it modern or Renaissance or Graeco-Roman; there appeared to be a general consensus of opinion how- ever thatTFwas Greek, antedating the Christian era. "FihaTly Mr. de Kay went to Florence, where, without disclosing his interest in the statue, he learned from Signor Volterra the details of his discovery and purchase of the Aphrodite. FRONT VIEW OF ALTOVITI APHRODITE THE VENUS DE MEDICI II ^AN the marble from which the Aphrodite was carvedlje iHentifi Was it cut from a block taken from the old quarries^ on Mount Pentelikos within sight of Athens, quarries long ago exhausted, from which came the material to build the Parthenon, or was it made from marble from the Island of Paxos,^ also much used by Praxiteles and other Athenian sculptors ? It is cKracteHsficjQfLPentelikan marble that its warm, yel- lowish tone when freshly quarried disappears to some degree provided the block is not exposed to the weather. Where the sun and rain beat upon its surface, as in parts of the ruined Parthenon, the yellow tone increases. This is due to the presence of iron, which at some points in the surface becomes visible in fine metallic spicules. Upon examining this statue one finds a^eneral warm hue in the color of the marblcj, and curiously enough, in several places the riietallic spicules are clearly visible. When the statue was exhibited at the National Arts Club there happened to be in New York certain quarrymen from Athens engaged in work on an altar in the Greek Church. They unhesitatingly expressed the opinion that the marble of the Aphrodite was from the ancient but now exhausted Pentelikan quarries which had been used in building the Parthenon. The statue is clearly not of Parian marble. Although this is richer in tone than Carrara, it is whiter than THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE 25 Pentelikan and has a sharper, whiter glitter when fractured. The two materials have been much confused. Parian mar- ble had attained such a reputation after the great age of sculpture that writers were prone to assume it without discrimination. Records of the time of Pliny and Pau- sanias often speak, of Parian when the statue described, if an old one, was really Pentelikan, Indeed they can hardly be blamed for ignorance concerning a matter known only to quarry masters and sculptors. Even today in such collections as the Louvre and Vatican, one often comes across an old bit described in the catalogue as Parian which on close examination proves to be from the old quarry on Mount Pentelikos. Injthe old statueSi„objects such as the trunk of a tree or a large jar or dolphin, which we find in the Altoviti marble and in the Venus de Medici^ are generally placed neaTfnthi^fieure. Their use is often misunderstood and falsely interpreted. Such treatment of the old marbles was practical in its origin, being intended to obviate the danger lest the heavy mass of the torso break the marble at the ankles of the figure. As a familiar instance we have the Lykian Apollo in the Louvre, probably a Graeco-FToman copy^the of igihal by Praxitel^^ mentioned by, Lucian as an ornament of the gymnasium at Athens. The figure rests one elbow on a tfee~ffuhkr from which, half way down, juts a strong branch as a support to the left thigh. The sculptor has used the trunk and branch not only for strengthening the statue but to accentuate the relaxed pose of the god. VIEW OF RIGHT SIDE OF ALTOVITI APHRODITE VIEW OF LEFT SIDE OF ALTOVITI APHRODITE THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE 31 Another statue in the Louvre, the famous Apollo the Lizard-killer, has two, if iibt three; branches ^pringing^ from the trunk, all serving as firm supports for the marble figure. The Hermes at Olympia also has such a branch from the tree trunk, on the top of w^hich reposes his left arm; the branch also helps support the infant Bacchus and the gathered mass of drapery, In-vieffi^of jJie jieed-0£&uppQrtjdue,Jt.o the inhsrejit fra- gility of marble, sculptors are accustomed to place a block uhTier"fhe"hee^l^^7 C fpot jvhich is partially raised in the attitude: of suspended movement. This is often seen in statues after the manner of Praxiteles. We find it before his day in The Athlete by Polykleitos as well as in his Satyr Pouring Wine in the Buoncampagni Museum at Rome; als6~in'the Farnese Eros^ of the Louvre; and we must suppose it to have been used in the Hermes at Olympia, for the movement of the legs demands that one of the feet, which has been lost, should rest on the toes. This_supporting.block,under the heel of one foot is found in the Montalvo-Altoviti AphroditeT^ is also the other and~principal support, which takes the form of a~ dolphin coanectedwith-the figure of the Goddess, its tail touching at another point, giving still further strength to the lower portion of the statue. Praxiteles also considered_carefully_the character of the settingj.n which a work was to stand. A part which remained out of sight was notjfinished with the pains lavished upon theother parts. One notes for example the unfinished back of the Hermes with the infant Bacchus on his arm, which THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE 33 P^sanias, traveling in Greece in the second century after Christ, sgw ijn_the^^JHemon at Olyn^^ Evidently that masterpiece was originally intended for a niche, having been subsequently transferred to the Heraion when that temple became a museum. The Venus de Milo is another example of a niche statue with unfinished back. Very different is the Altoviti Aphro- dite, in which the back is a marvel of beautjr. Here was a^joddess to be admired from all sides, like the far-famed KnidianT'^phrodite by Praxiteles. " THE HERMES BY PRAXITELES PRAXITELES' "MARBLE FAUN w III HEN this statue was chiseled from the block, the artist was hot disturbed by the fact that the color of the marble did not rjan evenly and that a lighter tone appeared obliquely across and down the torso. The modern sculptor, precluded fro^P?^intyig_his statues, regards such a defect as prohibi- tive^ndje^eks a flawless block. The Renaissance as a rule pursued the same course, making, however, an occasional exception in the case of a portrait bust or religious statue of coarser stone and terra cotta. But the ancients felt the hard cold stone to be unsympathetic and therefore covered it with what the Greeks called yovSw and the Latins circumlitio, a varnish or polish of colored wax and oil rubbed into the marble, which took on the appearance of flesh or ivory. To cite one or two examples : There is in the British Museum a bust which has retained some of its original coloring, a rosy hue of lips and cheeks, a blue tone of the iris. And when the Hermes was first found at Olympia it had faint traces of color in the hair and drapery, while on the sandal the color was very distinct. Colors have survived better on many Tanagra figurines, perhaps because of the roughness of the terra cotta surfaces. The painting of sculpture was also common during the middle ages, and this method of treatment still persists in THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE 41 the painted images of the Roman Catholic churches today. Ancient statues were further prnament^^^ actual gol^narmrets (in our Ap-hrodits the Je^^^ depressi^nto Jiold_^ armlet in .p.kce).i with golden gemj|^et_piendants_in the^ears (the ears of this statue are bored for this purpose}; and in other ways by realistic touches, such as the placing of a golden fillet across the hair and the sprinkling of the tinted locks with powdered gold. At the time when statues of gods and goddesses were carved by the greatest sculptors the world has produced, the painter who added the finishing touches of color had to be an artist of consummate skill. It was his task to consider the light which was to illumine the figure, the background against which it was to stand, the distance from which it was to be seen by the worshippers at the outer gates. He must consider too the decorations to be added in drapery, gold, ivory or jewels. Goldsmiths as well as painters were employed to make the ornaments with which the statues were to be adorned. No artist was held too great to render such services, not even the proud Parrhasios, who, on losing a competition to paint a picture of Ajax, remarked that he cared very little for his own defeat, but was sorry for Ajax who was thus doomed to be defeated a second time. DETAIL OF THE ALTOVITI APHRODITE THE VENUS DE MILO h rv^?e^7Ns3?<2>Tv.3e(§^/T>3t