t>tatt College of g[griculture a Cornell ?Hnibec£(itj> atftaca, i?. g. Htfirarj) Cornell University Library The original of tiiis bool< is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924051825671 ELMIRA FARMERS' CLUB. ^1 HH FOR THE YEAR 1874. PUBLISHED BY THE CLUB. Reported for the Elmira Daily Advertiser, and for the Husbandman. 4 ELMIRA, N. Y. ADYEBTISBR ASSOCIATION STEAM BOOK AND .JOB PB1NTBE6 1875. INTRODUCTION. HI8T0EICAL SKETCH. It has fallen upon pae to prepare an introduction to this the first published vol- ume of the reports of the Elmira Farmers' Club. The Club has been often urged to preserve its reports by putting them in conven ient form for reference and use. In compliance with this demand, which has come from its many friends in different parts of the country, the Club has provided a small edition of its reports for the year 1874, which is nearly exhau sted by the orders already received. The exacting and constant duties which now engage the attention of Secretary Armstrong, have prevented him from giving his personal attention to the publica- tion, hence no revision of the reports has been made. For the information of new acquaintances of the Club, and as relating to a career quite jemarkable, I pro- pose to give a brief review of its history. Not having been prominently connect- ed with the Club, I feel at liberty to speak concerning its growth and successful labors with some degree of freedom. The Elmira Farmers' Club was organized on the 14th day of December, 1869 . There were present at this first meeting the following farmers: Geo. W. Hoffman, W. A. Armstrong, James McCann, Charles Heller, Lewis Fitch, Samuel A. Chap- man, Seely P. Chapman, John Bridgeman, Samuel Oarr and Daniel E. Howell. These practical and thoughtful farmers did not fully measure the importance of that little meeting as they gathered about the stove in a rude wagon shop, having the light of a single tallow candle. They were agreed that they could be of great service to one another by counseling concerningfarm methods and by investigating such agricultural questions as were of interest to them. But that they were to per- form a great service for the agricultural advancement of their country, that their discussions were to be read with interest and profit throughout the length and breadth of the land, that there were in that little party men whose ability and worth would shine out brightly through the discussions and labors of their Club, they did not fuUy realize. G. W. Hoffman was elected President, W. A. Armstrong Secretary, and Seely P. Chapman Treasurer. The first discussion was held on the evening of Decem- ber 22nd. Secretary Armstrong reported the discussion and modestly submitted it to the editor of one of the city papers. Concerning this little incident, the ed- itor of that paper, Mr. C. G. Fairman, at a reunion on the third anniversary of the Club, on which occasion the Secretary was presented with a beautiful set of sil- ver, spoke as follows : "Id the fall of 1869, the Elmira Farmers' Club was organized, and very soon thereafter I was waited upon at my editorial sanctum in the Advertiser office by one Armstrong, whose first name is William A., a farmer residing just upon the brow of the West Hill. He bore in his hands a little roll of paper, which he placed upon my table and rnodestly remarked that it was a report of the discussion at the Elmira Farmers' Cluli, and requested that it might be published. After he had retired I took up the roll of manuscript and began to glance at it with no other idea than that it would soon go into the waste basket, for the faculty of reporting such a discussion with intelligence and interest is a very rare one, which many who have been drilled at it for years in the schools of journalism fail to acquire. Indeed, it can not be acquired. It may be improved. But nature implants it in the breast of him who has it, and he who has it not cannot get it. You need not be surprised, therefore, that I looked with apprehension upon the daring effort of this plain farmer man from the West Hill. You have all taken u]) articles to read, the first sentence of which has confirmed you in reading them through. Just so you have all been chilled by an opening paragraph, and have doubtless thrown much good wheat away as chaff. I began with Mr. Armstrong's report, and I was at once charmed with its beginning, I saw that a master band grew out from that farmer head, and that the Advertiser had drawn a prize in the great Agricultu- ral Lottery. The waste basket was cheated of its prey. All that went into it was the useless manuscript after it had been transformed into letters of living light and received the magic touch of the printing press. I do not say too much when I seek to impress upon you the fact, that the regular publication of your reports has been the foundation stone of your great prosperity; and I say altogether too little when I declare that no other man lives, either in the town or city of Elmira, who could have reproduced your discussions with the skill and success of Mr. Armstrong. It has not only been a work of great skill, but it has involved great industry and hard labor. " These reports were eagerly sought. They were so plain and practical, they supplied the kind of literature which is far too rare even in our best agricultural papers. The thoughts presented in these discussions, the advice, the counsel giv- en to correspondents, wereall fresh from the actual experiences of the farm. The Olub rapidly increased in membership. Progressive farmers from neighbor- ing towns, then from adjacent counties, and afterwards from other States even, sought membership in this enterprising and prosperous Club. For three years it held its meetings in a small hall belonging to one of its mem- bers. A library was started. Gen. A. S. Diven gave $250; as much more was immediately raised. A competent committee selected the books. A valuable col- lection was made of such books as were of special interest to farmers and their families, including all the standard works upon agriculture, horncukure and flori- culture in their various branches. This library has received several important additions, and includes now 2,000 valuable and much read volumes. Three years ago the Club resolved to build a hall suited to its wants. At this time there was quite an effort to get it to locate in the business pmi of the city, as it had won for itself great popularity as an important institution of Elmira. But wise counsels prevailed, and it was resolved to keep it near the scene of its na- tivity, among the farmers who had started and built it up. Though always welcoming to its meetings the " city farmers, " it realized that its plain, laboring, practical farmers would not feel that freedom to engage in tlie discussions were its hall so located that there would be a large audience of profes- sional and business men. However earnest in their sympathies, many such spec- tators would be known as accomplished speakers, and their presence would em- barrass the free and unvarnished speeches of professional workers and careful ob- servers, but not speech makers. 3 For building the hall members advanced liberally of their means. Mr. David T. BiUings presented the Olub -with a lot. A substantial and showy two-story building, adorned with a lofty tower and flag staff, was erected, having in the second story the spacious hall. The library is neatly arranged in the alcove of the tower oflf the main room. The lower story of the building had not been used except on the occasion of the Olub festivals, or as a place for exhibiting farm products and machinery brought for the inspection of the Club, until last summer, when several influential and en- terprising members of the Club organized The Husbandman Association and commenced the publication of an agricultural newspaper. To this new undertak- ing the Olub has lent the most earnest aid, furnishing its spacious and commodi- ous rooms. There, right among the farmers, in the Farmers' Hall, owned, edited and managed by farmers, is to be seen one of .the most complete and practical print- ing offices in the country. With material entirely new, supplied with a finely- working engine, with the rooms heated by steam, with the best of workmen, who take pride in their work, a paper is weekly issued which is not only a source of pride to the Olub, but which is rapidly gaining favor all over the country on ac- count of its practical and fresh farm literature, and its thorough devotion to the farmer's cause. He who has in his unselfish devotion to agricultural progress,- by his ability as a writer, by his inimitable reports placed the Elmira Farmers' Olub far in the van of all similar bodies, and has achieved merited distinction for himself, is ably conducting the editorial management of the Husbandman. I mention the character and success of the paper because it is really a Olub en- terprise, in which not only the Secretary, but President Hoffman and many of the leading men of the Olub are earnestly interested, giving it the support of their ac- tive minds and ample means. No enterprise in which the Olub has engaged has lacked a vigorous push, nor has come short of a reasonable success. The implement trials which it has conduc- ted have been among the most important of the country, calling into competition scores of machines and attracting thousands of farmers. The selection of this county by the State Agricultural Society as a permanent location for the State Fair Grounds, was mainly due to the impetus given to agricultural improvement in this section through the exertions of the Club. The President of the Olub, G. W. Hoffman, a man of vigorous thought, of quick perception and prompt action, by his practical knowledge of agriculture and his great executive and general busi- ness ability, has stood as a mountain of strength. It is but just to say that men of unusual talent and of especial fitness for the work assigned them, have constantly served as his able coadjutors. The Farmers of Chemung County and citizens of Elmira feel a just pride in the success and important work of the Club, and many intelligent farmers in far dis- tant States freely declare that the reports of these discussions are worth to them more than the cost of any agricultural journal in the country. J. S. VAN DUZBB. ELMIRA FARMERS' CLUB. COLORADO liETIEE. Sathkday Evening, January 3, 187i. The following exceedingly valuable let- ter was written by a member oi the Club •who 'desires his name withheld, but as a guarantee of its genuineness the Club vouches for the character of the writer, who is a gentleman well known in this portion of the State. The letter was writ- ten in Denver, Colorado. The writer is a close observer and a clear thinker. The observations made and the facts gleaned have the force of truth, which made its impress, on the mind of the gentleman in such a manner that to-day he has his herds on " th.e plains" lazily transmuting the scanty though rich herbage into glit- tering* and substantial wealth. He writes: W. A. Armstrong, Secretary Elmira Farm- ers' Club: I have just spent eight weeks in the far Western States and in Colorado, much of the time among the stock men of Kansas and Colorado. I have seen droves of two thousand head of Texas cattle, some of which are very good. The cows of this class mated with short horned bulls pro- duce really fine stock. Kansas has as much grass on one acre as Colorado has on twenty, yet the cattle do better on the scanty feed of the Territory, because it is very sweet and exceedingly rich and nu- tritious. I send you samples of Colorado grass, which you are to understand grows •very thin. Some cattle men permit their stock to run the whole year without even seeing them more than once, which is in the spring, when they go all over the country and gather up all that can be found, into one place called the "Round-up." There they are assorted by their respective owners, and each ani- mal receives the distinctive brand when all are again turned loose, when away they go to graze and multiply at will un- til the next annual assembly at the round- up. This, however, is not the general prac- tice. The more methodical breeders keep men with their herds all the time, and carefully keep herds of different owner- ship distinct, each having a separate range, and this is a far better way and more certain of profit. AU this country constituting the great cattle range is undulating, with no timber except on the margins of streams, in which may be found the finest water, for it comes from the pure snows melting in the mountains not far away, where it glistens in the sunlight pleasant to the view of the herdsman, in every month of the year. The mountains contain val- leys of surpassing loveliness, where the footfall sinks in a cushion of the richest herbage, the limped streams stored with delicious fish, and where every breath of air is exhilerating as the ambrosia of fa- ble. I went yesterday up to Estes Park, which is about twenty miles from the plains, (the common designation of all the lower land,) and about five thousand feet higher, and with an altitude of twelve 6 thousand feet above the sea, Long's Park is near. The Park is a valley of about thirty thousand acres in extent. It has the finest grass and water and is adorned with numerous beautiful trees so disposed as to suggest the idea that na- ture in this, her paradise, has especially desired to please the eye, while giving ad- equate protection against the fierce glare of a noonday sun, which looks in through an atmosphere so remarkably pure that the retina has pictured upon it the distant landscape as distincly clear as if it were within a stone's throw. Yet all this beauty is visited, perhaps adorned, by nightly frosts. In this valley Messrs. Brown and Southroup have eight hun- dred head of oattle. A few figures, which I obtained from Mr. G. G. Evans, will in- terest some members of the Club. Two years ago these gentlemen sent five hun- dred head into this vaUey, and a year la- ter four hundred head. The nine hundred head cost nineteen thousand doUars. — From these they have sold to the amount of eleven thousand dollars, and to be pre- cise, have now seven hundred and fifty head worth twenty-five dollars per head, and two hundred and fifty young ones worth ten doUars apiece. Remember, it costs nothing or thereabouts to keep, so let us make up the account thus : 750 head @ $25 $18,750 250 yonng, @ $10 2,500 Sales 11,000 $32,250 Deduct original investment 19,000 Leaves profit $13,250 All this in Colorado, as the result of a little capital fairly invested and left to take care of itself for two years. Nowhere in the Territory is hay or grain fed to cat- tle. Some graziers prefer mountain ranges and some plains ; but everywhere the cat- tle are fat, some of them very fat. Dro- vers are here from Iowa, buying all the steers they can get to take home and be fed with corn until spring, and then sent east, first-class beef. It is alleged that these steers when put to corn feed, take on fat much better and more profitably than the home reared. The price here ranges from three to three and a half cents per pound, live weight. My friends, McCann of Elmira, and Carpenter of Big I'lats, can get good steers here for feed- ing. Send them out. Of course you understand no cultivated crops can succeed here without irrigation — nothing but the native grasses, not a shade tree nor any kind of grain without irrigation, except the trees in favored valleys and along streams where the roots reach down to moisture. I met to-day at Greeley, G. S. Hill, from HiUsboro, thirteen miles distant. — He has been in the territory thirteen years, and has been raising cattle since 1865, when he commenced with just two thousand dollars — all the capital he had. After five years in the business, in 1870, he sold his herd for sixteen thousand two hundred and eighty-eight dollars, which, deducting his small capital, stands as the profit of his venture, for he had all the time supported his family out of the busi- ness. He began with a few American cows, (which means cows driven in from the old States, or their descendants), and used short horn and Devon bulls. The latter he likes better because hardier. — His three-year old steers have averaged eleven hundred and fifty to twelve hun- dred and fifty pounds each, and he has usually sold for three cents per pound. — He feeds no hay nor grain, and lets the calves run with the cows until their in- stincts or disagreements bring about the weaning. He thinks calves so raised make as good steers at three years old as those raised by hand at four or five years old. The cost of the three year old steer thus raised, he estimates at from three to five dollars exclusive of the interest on capi- tal invested in the mother, wliich at the high rates prevailing, may be put down at three dollars, making the average cost of the steer -when he goes to market, six to eight dollars. Mr. Hill has now on hand two hundred and thirty-sis head of cattle, forty of which are' two year old steers, for which he has already been offered twenty-eight dollars per head. He gives some atten- tion to the rearing of horses, and thinks a three year old colt costs no more than a steer of the same age, except what is due to the greater cost of the mare, than of the cow. He has now thirty horses on his farm, which embraces four hundred and thirty-six acres. His grain crop is mostly wheat, of which for the last three years he has had each year seventy -five acres, averaging thirty-seven bushels per acre, or two thousand seven hundred and seventy-five bushels for his yearly crop. The crop makes but little cost beyond labor and seed; there are no rains, and it can stand safely in shock until a con- venient season for threshing, which is usually done in the field. The seed is sown about the first of March, and the land irrigated about the first of June, with the water kept on until the tenth of July. Harvest comes in August. Oats do not succeed as well as they did five years ago. Now,thirty-five to fifty bush- els to the acre is a good crop, which is not more than a fair crop in well tilled lands in New york State. Barley yields from forty to sixty bushels to the acre. — Mr. Hill has land which he says has been cropped for eleven successive years with- out any return of fertilizing matter, ex- cept what comes through irrigation, and during aU this time there has been steady annual improvement in the yield. He says he has raised on several acres an av- erage yield of wheat to the acre, of fifty- four bushels. The cost of irrigating, which varies somewhat according to local- ities, expense of appliances, etc., is in his case about fifty cents per acre. Of course, this is quite independent of the original cost of the canal which in a general way is estimated at one dollar to every acre. — The exceeding dryness of the summer so thoroughly abstracts all moisture from the wheat berry that to insure good flour it is necessary to moisten artificially some hours before grinding. Thus treated, the wheat makes the very best quality of flour. What will seem curious to you, the moistening is done by running the bin full of water, in which the wheat soaks eight or ten hours, just previous to the grinding. You can judge somewhat of the exceeding flintiness of the berry which requires such treatment to fit it for grinding, and you may reasonably infer that the climate is intemperately dry. I propose to give you now the figures of one other herd of, cattle, that of Mr. A. B. Daniels, who has been four years in the business. He bought, to begin with, twenty-three hundred head of cattle, cost thirty-two thousand dollars. He has sold to the amount of thirty-five thous- and five hundred dollars and has now on hand cattle, estimated value, thirty-six thousand five hundred dollars. His ac- count stands : Sales in four years $35,500 Stock on hand 36,500 Total value $72,000 Deduct original investment 32,000 Profit in four years . .$iO,000 Mr. Daniels' operations are in South Western Colorado, one hundred and forty miles from Denver. He says the cost of the care of his cattle does not exceed sev- enty-five cants per head for the whole time of keeping. In other words that sum covers all expenses of herding, and that is all the care he has to give. He lives in Pennsylvania, and this over- ture is simply a httle outside speculation. Such instances, with varying degrees of profit, can be cited all over the grazing district, but lest you tire of the subject, I hasten to give you somejresults attained with sheep for which I am indebted to M. D. Potts, of Pueblo : In the summer of 1869 he bought one thousand Mexican sheep for one thousand dollars. He used twenty merino bucks. In four years he sold wool to the amount of ten thousand two hundred and eighty- six dollars, and six hundred wethers [for one thousand nine hundred and fifty dol- lars, and has now on hand three thousand seven hundred sheep, valued at nice thousand two hundred and fifty dollars. His merino bucks cost twenty dollars each, making for them four hundred dol- lars, and the whole account: Sales wool in four years $10,286 Sales 600 wethers 1,950 Stock on hand 9,250 Total proceeds 21,486 Deduct original capital 1,400 Profits 20,086 He has a man who takes all the care^of his flocks for one-half the net profits. — Shelter is provided, and some hay is fed during the month of April and a portion of May. The remainder of the year the sheep graze. I am satisfied that there is greater profit in sheep husbandry than in cattle raising, provided good care is taken of the sheep, but in this easy country men hesitate at any outlay that looks to the provision of artificial comfort for stock, and for that reason most of the graziers prefer cattle as being hardier and therefore more certain to withstand the rigor of a, climate, which in certain por- tions of the year, tells with considerable severity on the unprotected flocks. The estimate of increase is eighty calves an- nually from one hundred cows, and the table of values : 1 year old SlO 00 2 " 20 00 3 " 30 00 4 " 40 00 And this is expected above all cost of raising and keeping. I am satisfied the calculation is well based. This year half a million Texas cattle will be driven into Colorado and Kansas, where they will be sold for fattening, and to^establish herds for breeding, at about the following rates : 1 year old $ 7 2 " 10 3 " 16 4 " 20 Cows 15 I saw in Kansas not less than one hun- dred thousand of these cattle feeding on the sweet grass of which the specimen sent you is a fair sample. It stands thin on the ground and never grows taller than the tuft I send you. It dries up in the fall and cures standing, with all its nutriment retained, so that cattle* fatten on it all winter. The buffalo grass, of which you have also a sample, grows thick, but never more than about four inches in height. There is some of this in Colorado, but for the most part it is found in Western Kansas. I could give you figures relating to gen- eral farming, but there is no especial need. Wages are about twenty-five dol- lars per month, but no great degree of intelligence comes within that range. — There are certain and magnificent profits for him who puts mind intU business,and so far the terrible uncertainties of eastern farming come not to affiiot the husband- man. BEAUTIFYIKG HOMES. Friday, Jan. 10, 1874. The attendance was kss than usual, per- haps becauae the subject for discussion was suggestive of the shortcoming of several members aud therefore embarrassing to speech. Several members, who are usually 9 good talkers, remained silent during the meeting, althougti there wa8 unusual pressure to bring them out. Many of the chairs were occupied by ladies, who evinced lively interest in the remarks of those mem- bers bold enough to talk of beautifying homes. Trees, flowers, gardens and other outward adornments of home, constituted the theme which inspired many beautiful tlioughts, beautifully set forth. And some of the speakers, touching upon the moral beauties of well-ordered home life, betrayed emotion which did honor to their hearts. This report cannot do justice to the elo quence which was exhibited, not in words, but in those signs which reveal the good impulsts of warm hearts. All that was said was earnestly given, and deeper mean- ing was but half concealed. The coming spring will witness the planting of many a tree and vine and ornamental shrub, whose freshness and beauty in after years shall serve as mementoes of this meeting of plain farmers, whose most ' sacred treasures are their homes. A brief communication from S C. Taber, read by the Secretary, was the key-note of all. lie explains that absence from the city until the day of the meeting prevented his receiving notice of the demand upon him to open the discussion, and proceeds : " ' Mother' and 'Home' are two of the deareEt and most beautiful words in our language, and both are so intimately con- nected that whatever will tend to beautify the one will tend to increase the happiness of the other. L fe is short, and our oppor- tunities for happiness are limited. AVe should improve and enjoy the opportuni- ties to the fullest extent. Our homes should furnish us our greatest enjoyments. In order that they may do so they should be beauffied most beautifully. Thus we shall increase our own happiness and con- tribute to the happiness of others. Too many of us farmers are disposed to devote our energies to the cultivation of the soil rather than to a cultivation of a taste for the beautiful. This need not be so— this should not be so. We can, and we should render our homes beautiful in themselves and beautiful in their surroundings. What some would esteem beautiful, however, others would not. There is a glory of the moon, and a glory. of the stars. The glory, of the stars cannot equal the glory of the moon, and the beauty of some homes can not equal the beauty of some others. But inasmuch as the smallest star has a glory peculiar to itself, so also our smallest homes can have a beauty which for tliem cannot be surpassed. " Our houses need not be large in order to be beautiful. There is beauty in every house where love and contentment abijle, but without love beautiful palaces are by no means beautiful homes. If we would have our homes truly beautiful, we should obey the eleventh commandment, and 'love one another.' This should be no promiscuous love, but we should love our wives and our children, and no h,ome can be beautiful without a -wife and children. — As soon think of enjoying summer without sunshine, or winter without snow, (such as we are now suffering) as to have or enjoy a beautiful home without a wife and chil- dren. Any and all other adornments can be dispensed with better than these. But with these, and with such beauties as al- ways cluster around the spot where they are gathered together, will be found a beautiful home. And 'be it ever so humble there's no place like Tiome.' " But, without going into further details, Brother Armstrong, we should all so beau- tify our homes while we have homes to en- joy, and our li,ves while we have lives to live, that when we come to 'shuffle ofi^ this mortal coil,' and to turn our toes to the roots of the grass, we shall be prepared to enter into and enjoy the beauties of that beautilied home of many mansions, pre- pared before the foundations of the earth, whose builder and maker is God." G. S. McOanjn — There is much room to ta' k on this sul iject which Mr. Taber has 10 but just opened. There are a thousand ways to beautify our homes — ways that are within the reach and means of the most humble. Much, very much, can be done by planting trees, which adorn any home, and their cultivation and care serves to ele- vate our tastes for the beautiful. When we pass by houses so adorned, we are pleased by their beauty, and we should be thus reminded of our duty in this way to please others. I am greatly in favor of planting trees, and I would recommend to farmers and their families the planting and cultivation iy their own hands, as a means of pleasure and happiness which cannot in such full measure be derived from the beau- ties created by others. Plant a tree your- self, and give it your personal care, and you must feel more interest in its growth than if the labor were done by another. — By all means set trees about your homes and along the road fences. It does not require wealth to do this, a little pleasant labor and watchful care, that is all. Time and the seasons will do the rest. The poor man can always beautify his humble home with trees, which by their freshness and beauty serve to make him more happy and become also a public pleasure. I have said it does not require wealth for this species of adornment, and I may say, also, wealth does not always make beautiful homes. — Often we pass by the homes of the rich, where the outward appearance is elegant, the house handsome, and the grounds giv- ing proof of refined taste in their adorn- ments, and we are led to suppose comfort abides within. Alas, it does not always. Love, contentment and kindness must have their homes within the family, or all these outward beauties fail to give the delight of which thoy are capable. After all, with- in the house, woman has most to do to se- cure for all the greatest happiness. With- out her kindly ministrations no home can be complete, but with her delicate atten- tion to a hundred little things, home can be blessed and happy — the "dearest place on earth." Let one have such a spot, and roam the world over, he cannot forget the charms left behind. Hourly his heart will return to his home, the abo:Ie of happiness, which he can no where else find ; and more especially is this true if with that home there is associated the remembrance of a godly mother. Yet with all these good influences by which the very name of home is made sacred, man sometimes recklessly destroys all that is good, and makes home miserable. Ilia blighting influence may darken the brightest spot. He has duties within the house as well as without; But let him get refinement by the cultivation of trees and flowers, and he is better fitted for the kind offices at home. Ho can begin very cheaply. Suppose he set out and cul- tivate a Siberian crab. It is beautiful in its foliage, beautiful in its bloom and beau- tiful in its crimson fruit. No farmer is so poor that he may not have such beauties clustered around his home, and if he has, besides, thrift and cleanliness within, the children clean and tidily clad, the smiles of contentment over all, he cannot be very unhappy. I have seen log houses where the surroundings pleased the eye and true happiness found there a home. Let it once be learned that wealth is not necessary to make home beautiful and happy, and then let all begin to do something to adorn the spots where they must stay, so will homes of beauty spring up everywhere and all be made more happy. Me. S. M. Caer — I can hardly agree with Mr. McCann that so mnch of the re- sponsibility for happy homes rests with woman. She has her duties, it is true, but man has more influence for evil. He is to provide and she to care and arrange. He must see to the surroundings, but let these all be fixed — let there be trees and drives, walks and fountains, and all that is con- venient and beautiful to the eye, he, with sour looks, can effectually spoil it all. — When he comes in, if he seats himself in the library and engages himself with the paper, waiting for the bell to summon him to his meal, to which he goes with a 11 fault finding spirit, think you there is hap- piness then for him or for his family ?— Now, there are hundreds of, such homes with their beauty marred. Let him remem- ber that the wife during his absence has had the care of the children and household matters ; that she has been faithfully try- ing to minister to his comfort and may be more weary than he. It is his duty to come with pleasant words and no unselfish heart. Lst him have pleasant words to give to wife and children. Take the latter into familiar conversation, kindly asking and receiving questions. If he is too sel- fish to do this, he drives to despair. He should get down to the little wants and pleasures of his little ones, leaving what may be his burdens out of the home which it is his duty to make happy. He should tax his mind to arrange pleasures for tUose' whose happiness depends upon him. It is dreadful to live so that children fear to approach. The suiliyflit of his counte- nance should beam upon his home as the light of heaven falls upon earth, warming it into beauty and loveliness. If he chooses to live in the other way, he chooses to sink his manhood into brutiahness and is un- worthy of the pleasures which a well-or- dered home can give. A loji; house with cheerful faces and kindly words is fj,r pref- erable. It may be pleasant and even beau- tiful. In response to calls made by the ladies, Mr. D. E. Howell said : — I have been thinking my door yard is not as beautiful as I have often been invited to make it. — Facts and sentiments have been well set forth, and meet my cordial approval. It is truly said no home is beautiful without love, no matter how costly its fittings. It is pleasant, when one after absence returns to his home and is met by his children gleefully exclaiming, "Papa has come." It delights him to be the object of such affection. But suppose he is tired with his labors and finds this cheerful greeting followed by "a call for stove wood ! Will he not achieve a victory over himself if he can repress a scowl and go cheerfully to the added task ? For myself, I am always glad to go home and glad to stay there. — I wish I were there to night. There is truth in the old couplet : "Man wants but little here below, Nor wants that little long." What is needed to make home pleasant is unity of feeling and active with earnest desire to please. People overlook the humble requirement. They soar high and incline, too, to spread, out. They measure beauty by height between floors. They build big houses with lofty ceilings, and really think they have ''gone and done it ;" as if happiness can be commanded in such ways. It is all a mistake. Show and glitter cannot bring happiness. I do not condemn expenditures of great sums for houses, if they can be afforded — good comes from money so used. What I mean to say is, that great houses are by no means essential to happiness. Modest houses, decorated with taste and good judgement, are quite compatible with the highest de- gree of home enjoyment, while misery al- ways comes with vain efforts to ape the grand or to outshow our neighbors. Mr. W. S. Cabr — So far in this discuss- ion I have heard nothing about the older children — the nearly grown up young men and women. May not home be made so pleasant that they shall not feel obliged to go out to seek pleasure ? I am satisfied that our children go out too soon, and that if parents provide better for their happi- ness they' may be restrained from many evil ways. In many homes the parental notions of propriety are so strict and se - vere that the young are unduly repressed. Their amusements are often boisterous and may be so, and yet harmless. It is quite natural that they should be noisy, and even perhaps rude ; but they may be guided by sympathies rauher than by se- verities. It often happens that the few 12 books which have S3rve(l the needs of the pareats are thought to be sufficient for the youQg men and women, while they thick, and justly, too, that more are needed. — They hear of newer works, and desire to read such. Lat them be provided. The world is advancing— the old is not always the best. Aid them to the fullest extent in their endeavors to seek knowledge. Be assured if the parents are so engrossed in the pursuit of wealth that they cannot heed tlie reasonable demands of children, evil will come. Cultivate in them a taste for pure literature and provide the means for its enjoyment. Strive always to make home the dearest 6pot ou earth, so that when they must go abroad their thoughts will turn to the good old home with pleas- ure. There is another thing to consider. — Home to be beautiful must be permanent. Oar American homes are too shifting — at- tachments grow. Home to be a reality must be permanent. The trees and shrubs thus become objects of affection. We shall find that our efforts to make home beau- tiful will at last enlist the aid of our chil- dren as their growing attachments fasten upon objects with which they are long fa- miliar. Mr. James MoOann — I desire to add conflrmation to the idea that wealth is not necessary to produce the finest adornments of home. Trees and flowers and neat sur- roundings are easy to procure — within the reach of all. Ic is true, enjoyments depend upon disposition. Outward appearance is not all. But the outward adornments are easy. It needs only tbe disposition to en- sure their provision, A little time, which can easily be spared— a little care, which can easily be given. Mr. FLETcnER Carr— Upon mothers de- pends the education of the daughters, and in ray judgment they should be so brought up that they would make good wives for farmers, and not be led to suppose their chief happiness depends upon unices with city clerks. The center-table should be provided with something better than yel- low covered books. Mr. Carr proceeded to delineate character, and drew forcible contrasts between proper management and the fashionable follies of some homes. AGKICULTURAL NEW3PAPEKS. Satl'Eday, January 17, 1874. According to previous announcement ag- ricultural newspapers were discussed — it may be added — with considerable freedom. In these times of independent thought far- mers profess the ability to define their own wants. And in some instances they have made vigorous moves toward the attainment of the desired benefits. They have brought the question of cheap transportation to the front, and given it such prominence that the entire country is interested in its con- sideration. The agency through which these matters are reached is the newspaper, and latterly in these reforms the agricultural newspaper has had its part. It will be seen that the Club has given bold expression to its ideas about the duties of these papers. A fine attendance applauded the sentiments ut- tered. Mr. W. S. Carr was called to the opening and read the following paper : Intelligence has done for the farmer with- in fifty years what toil and patient labor had failed to do in the ages past; it has lifted him from a condition little better than serf- dom; it has brought him profits from his labor, whereas before it was a struggle for hfe ; socially it has made him the equal of men of any other calling ; his awakining in- telligence has brought the world to see his needs and to fill the demands. Bailroads, canals and telegraph lines have been laid ont with reference to his uses ; the markets of the world are brought to his very door. The inventive genius of the world is taxed to pro- vide for him the implements his intelli- gence demands. Educated in the principles of economy, he is everywhere regarded as 13 tKe enemy of corruption and fraud, and there is no ofSce under the government to which he may not aspire. To what does he owe this improvement in his condition ? Clearly to his , increased intelligence, and, if so, a growing intelligence will be his best surety for the future. Among the means of infor- mation the newspaper stands preeminent. At an average cost of five cents it contains more matter and information than a bound volume costing two dollars ; hence it becomes the most available means of information. Agricultural news- papers, as their name implies, are supposed to be for and devoted to the in- terest of the farmer. Their editors should be practical farmers, the better to guard against eiTor and the more able to sympa- thize with their readers ; the paper should be weekly at least, open to communication from subscribers — in fact relying on them for much of its matter. It should give full market reports and advices thereon, and give the fullest assurance that they are not in the interest of speculators. Political only so far as to fairly state the political situation and status of all parties. Politics do not usually add to a farmer's intelligence, they rather tend to make a fool of him. It should be fearless in its exposure of frauds and corruption in high places; of dishonest seedsmen and nurserymen ; of humbug patents, with a name but no merit. Belying on the farmer for its support, it should always be true to his interests. Ad- vertisements "in it should be limited, and the fact of their being admitted should be a sufficient guarantee of the responsibility of . the parties advertising. An advertisement many times is of more practical benefit to the farmer than the rest of the entire paper. It should be a family paper contain- ing much of real interest to every member of the family; in the story department, care- ful to educate the children to a love of home and the vocation unto which they were bom. It should stand at the outposts of scientific dis- coveries in this chosen field of ours, and by ex- periment and theory endeavor to establish facts. Above aU it should have a moral tone, not conservative but setting forth the accept- ed doctrines of our Christianity in purity and with power, "for what shall a man profit if he gain the whole world and lose his own soul ?" Such a paper I recommend as being of great value to us all ; the common newspaper we stand in great need of, but the agricultural newspaper is a necessity; as well might a sur- geon go forth with a carpenter's kit as for a farmer to expecK success through a common newspaper alone. • As we aim to be practi- cal, and as some have expected I would name a paper suited to our uses, I do name the Rural New Torlcer as a paper containing all the points that I have set forth. Other papers may be as good, but with them I have not so thorough an acquaintance. Mr. J. S. VanDuzee. — In closing his re- marks Mr. Carr opens out a point upon which there may be much disagreement. He recom- mends a particular paper while there are mem- bers here who take others and some members several others, which they regard as better suited to educate the public mind or to serve their personal needs. I am sure I should differ with his preference. It is a fact that all who have studied agricultural papers, have found much that is of doubtful utility. The useful must be gleaned out and the im- practical rejected. Very many agricultural writers are theoretical, and some papers which rank as agricultural are trashy in their character. Their is so much space to be filled, and matter goes in which is worse than doubtful in its tendency. If we aecept all, we shall be led astray. Since the en- largement of the paper of which our friend speaks so highly, it is less reliable than be- fore because of the necessity for filling the great space which is given more to theorists, and to weak writers who serve up trash not of an agricultural character. As far as my observation and experience go, the Country Gentleman is much beeter for the thoughtful farmer, and taking the liber- ty to recommend, as Mr. Carr has, I say to those who take a single agricultural paper, let that be the Country Gentleman. It does not deal in mere theories, and if articles are admitted whieh, by their extravagance are 14 likely to mislead, the editors are quite sure to accompany them with words of caution. A few weeks ago an instance occurred to il- lustrate this careful disposition to save read- ers from imposition. An article on the profits of dairying set forth figures and al- leged facts by which it was made to appear that the business is immensely remunera- tive, and to the unsophisticated all had the appearance of truth itself. There were so many quarts of milk as the daily yield of a cow, and the average carried along through the year, with estimates of butter and cheese to be made from all, but the trouble was the premises were wrong. There is no such yield, no such average, and of course no such result. Now the editors obviated the pernicious tendency of the article, by print- ing with it a note calling attention to the false bases of estimates. Such care is com- mendable and saves in this case perhaps many disastrous failures. Our essayist has also said that the paper shoxddbe weekly. That is well; but I have to add that there is no paper which gives me more pleasure than I have in perusing the American Agriculturist, and it is published monthly. Much of its excellence is due to that veteran writer, Joseph Harris, who Ip,- bors in the cause with the zeal of an enthu- siast and the honesty that inspires confi- dence. We shall all agree that great good is de- rived from reading agricultural papers, but I would urge farmers not to depend upon them alone for their teaching. Let farmers think for themselves. Perhaps the best use of the papers is to stimulate thought. There is no doubt in my mind that we need here an agricultaral paper, that could have a local interest, and I believe it could be well sustained. Or if the venture be too great, we do at least need an agricultural department in the weeklies already estab- lished. Do not suppose I mean a page marked "Agricultural," to tickle the fancy of the farmer who is asked to subscribe. I mean more. There is an imperative demand for agricultural matter in the weeklies that go into general circulation. It seems to me that our papers should make a department devotedj to our interests, and that there should be employed thereon talent which should be properly paid and reqxxired to prepare in every issue something calcu- lated to interest and to teach farmers. I am not speaking of these reports. We read them and are interested, but we want other original matter, and a steady effort to pro- vide it. I have just returned from the an- nual meeting of the American Dairymen's Association at Utica, where I was greatly pleased by the full reports of the proceed- ings in the columns of the TJtica Herald and Utica Observer. It is not too much to say that the great success of the dairy business in Herkimer and other counties, now famous for their products, is due to the well directed efforts o; the Herald. It started the board of trade which brings the producer and con- sumer together, and saves to the former the profits before reaped by the middleman. Purchasers from across the ocean wait upon the sellers there. Now aU this is of great importance to the manufacturers of cheese and butter. The Herald is not exclusively agricultural, but the deep interest it takes in our affairs, and the energy it displays in providing matter of interest to farmers have given it great favor among us all. Agricul- tural matter is more generally read than any other. Even the reports of our proceedings are sought after away from here. I met in Utica the _ secretary of an institution in a western county who had long been an interested reader of our reports, and who asked me to name some members of our Club upon whom his society might call for agricultural ad- dresses and essays. Mr. D. E. Howell — In regard to the Rural New Torlcer, the last speaker has expressed my views. For many years I was a subscri- ber, but I began to think it decreased in in- terest and dropped it. Of late I do not know much about it, but it is ctuite certain it fails te please me as it used to. I have been a reader of the Practical Farmer and regard it as sound and good, but when it gets along it is always overdue. If I were to express my sentiments about the Rural I should say that it feeds us on very coarse fodder, like sowed com for our cattle. There are too many 15 loose statements instead of facts. If a young inquirer after knowledge should be guided by such teachings he would be lead astray. This criticism will apply to much agricultural writing. Figures which are wild are set down as the true basis of an es- timate and they lead into trouble. There must be deductions for drouth, something knocked off for worms, and allowances for evil effects from other causes quite be- yond the farmer's power to' regulate. I don't believe in the inflammatory and elongated articles about the riches of the butter business and of grain raising. The allowances must be made. After aU the agricultural papers have done a great deal of good and have power for gi-eater good. They have helped to make farming pleasant and profita- ble. They have done much to edu- cate the young, and to adorn and beautify our homes. They go out over a wide field, hence the greater importance of their good teaching. There is one matter in which even the Rural has humbugged us amazingly — in the character of its advertisements — while it has professed to admit nothing of a deceptive character, the allurements of money have opened its columns to much that is really pernicious. Under this plea of honesty there is more capability of evil in swindling ad- vertisements. I would not so much object ta their admission if the paper needs the money and would withhold the implied en- dorsement, which is given with their pub- lished determination to admit only such as are worthy of confidence. This feature alone is capable of working infinite harm and great losses of money. Mr. James F. Bbboheb — I read the Rural New Torher, and I must object to these criti- cisms. It is a good paper, And its labors are in the interest of agriculture. There is no reason why we should not have statements of great successes with the figures that seem to look extravagant to some of our poor far- mers. Here is a man who speaks disparag- ingly of com fodder, and likens the articles of the Rural to such "coarse fodder," as he calls it, because he does not know how to raise it or cure it or use it. Other members, in pre- vious discussions, have talked without knowl- edge of this valuable crop. (Mr. Beeoher entered with warmth into the defense of the crop so much aspersed, and recommended farmers to learn of the proper management by reading the Rural New YorTcer.) Geokqe S. McCann — There is much im- provement in agricultural papers in the last few years, and of this we ought to be proud ; but in our own papers there is negligence in a certain department. I al- lude to the market reports. I object to the way these are handled by the Advekti- SBB and by the Gaiette. Look at either of them to find the market value of any pro- duct and you will not learn much. Tou are anxious about any kind of grain, and on look- ing at the market reports you find this infor- mation : "The market has declined two cents since our last report." Now you go back a week and you find nothing. Gro an- other week and there is notice of another two cents decline or advance and you have learned nothing. Now let them give us full detailed statements of all that happens in the market with statements of real transactions Let them publish more matter which directly interests the farmer. Let them teU us the history of oats, and of wheat, and where, and when tobacco originated. (The speaker was promptly referred to Mr. BilHngs.) The Horseheads Journal in these matters excels them both. If the Gaxette would spend the time and money upon agricultural matter that it gives to its Illustrated Month- ly Supplement, I have no doubt it would at- tract ten new subscribers for every one it gets by that bait. The New Tork "Weekly Tribune was one of the first to enter the field here indicated, and it obtained a great in- crease of circulation because it met a public want. And I say now, whoever reads the Tribune attentively and thoughtfully wiU become an educated man. I do not refer to its politics — it is a paper devoted to tho in- terests of mankind. It treats religion, sci- 16 enoe, commerce and art, and so elevates all its readers in knowledge. Mr. Van Duzeb — Let me add my endorse- ment to all he has said of the Tribune. It has done and is now doing a great work. Among the dairymen assembled at TJtica I found the Tribune and the Times almost without excep- tion the two papers accepted as author- ity in the price of dairy products and the transactions with customers based on their quotations. Writers in the agricul- tural department of the Tribune are employed from that class known as practical farmers, who know whereof they write. Such a man is L. B. Arnold. Utterly simple in his man- ners, conscientious to the last degree, thoughtful and earnest in all that he does. A devotee of science, he entered upon the study of chemistry almost in his old age, because such knowledge was needed to elu- cidate knotty points in his profession. I was pleased in a recent interview to learn that he is likely to enter upon a permanent engage- ment as an agricultural writer. Mr. James McCann — Agricultural writings are good for all farmers, but he who depends upon them alone to guide his practice will be but a poor farmer. Mr. S. M. Caer defended the Rwral New Yorher at length and advocated the exercise of more thought in farming. Satueday, Jan. 24tli, 1874. Vice President McCann called the meet- ing to order promptly at the hour at which time there was a very fine attendance. There had already appeared the premonitory symp- toms of a storm within the hall, while there was a shrieking gale without. But the omin- ous muttei-ings were harmless. A tilt with the newspapers, no doubt, -was thought of, because it would be a delightful way to grat- ify the pugnacity of some members. The last meeting had offered the gage of battle, at a single point, but while this was well fortified and reinforced, this meeting showed no desire to precipitate hostilities. The newspapers will stdl exist, and Club mem- bers will buy and read them, except in times of political excitement, when farmers having not the slightest interest in politics, can not of course be expected to care for what the papers say. The fact is, farmers are just ready for that blessed state when the lion and the lamb shall lie down together, and imtil that period they will see to it, that the lamb shaU hurt no one — not even a defences- less newspaper. Mr. James F. Beechee — -There have been many subjects discussed here, and no doubt some of us have some good reason to change opinions. That is necessary if we advance. When we find ourselves holding to error we must be always ready to cast loose. There are men who have condemned the raising of pumpkins, and I suppose continue that error. Practice and observation have taught me that pumpkins are good to fatten cattle, good for milch cows to increase and improve the butter, imparting a fine yeUow color, and good for aU farm stock that wUl feed on them. Much has been said here of root crops, and not all in favor. Certainly turnips, beets and carrots are all excellent to feed cattle. They improve the health, make growth and impart vigor. But here, as we are situated, in a market always calling for these crops at a good price, I cannot say it is always profit- able to feed them. It is doubtful if the value of turnips for feeding cattle is ever more than twenty cents a bushel, and forty cents is a common price paid. Better let them go and put the money in com meal or wheat shorts, or buckwheat bran, for any of these at the cost will be more profitable to feed. Corn fodder has rather fallen into disre- pute in this Club. I must insist it is because of lack of knowledge. "With an experience in raising and feeding it nearly fifty years I feel that I can not be mistaken in my esti- mate of its value. There are no such diffi- culties in its management as we hear narra- ted. My own way is to sow in drills using Southern seed because sweeter — ^rows far enough apart to permit a horse to pass — cnl- 17 tivate thoroughly until the crop has complete possession of the ground, harvest before frost, or about the time of cutting field plant- ed corn. Set up in stooks of moderate size, and bind only the tops, and draw in when cured, which, with good weath«r may be in a, week. In this way there is no trouble nor loss. I have just fed out the last of mine sweet, and fresh as at the first. I think a, cause of much trouble is that the stooks are often tightly bound about the middle by which the circulation is impeded and the inner portion is not cured when the stalks go to the barn. As to the seed I think most farmers use too much, many five or six bushels to the acre. Half that amount is plenty enough. If our friend Van Duzer wiU try the plan I have drawn, he wiU no longer mislead the pubhc by declaring sowed corn worthless. Something has been said about beautify- ing homes — all in too narrow a sense — I call my farm my home, evei-y field and tree is part and parcel of the home^I would beautify. Even the growing crops, the playful lambs skipping in their pastures, all are of my home. I would never relax effort to improve all these, because such efforts add always to the beauty of home. I would say something of the papers but they were fully discussed last week. As to the market reports we can help ourselves to what information there is to be had, and not get it two weeks behind the times. The wonder to me is that the market reports are so good, considering the difficulties. Mr. S. M. Caeb — Four years these discus- sions have been maintained, and there is quite too much to review. I remember well the first discussion, with its surroundings. We talked of timber — the best time to cut; and of fence posts — how to set to promote durability, whether top or butt downward. I well remember on that occasion when these ten men convened for a modest talk, one of them, in retiring after all had been said, de- clared himself well repaid for aU his cost and trouble by the accession of ideas. In subsequent meetings many things have transpired to interest us all, and no doubt instruction has come to many. I shall not attempt even to enumerate the topics dis- cussed, much less to review them all. Only here and there shall I touch some salient point, and then only for the purpose of pro- moting thought. In 1871 we had before us the "rotation of crops," and our secretary read an original essay full of interest to me, but if I may use the expression, he stepped on the toes of many members. He asked what would be thought of a man who should draw upon his banker untU his deposits were gone and credit exhausted, and then, when his drafts should be dishon- ored, he should berate the banker for his failure to extend unmerited favors. And to such a man he likened him who exhausts the fertility of his fields by continu- al cropping without the proper deposits and then grumbles about the hardships of farming. He advocated rotation as a means of maintaining fertility, and our friend Geo. McCann insisted that three crops of wheat might be raised in succession just as well as the three successive crops, com, oats and wheat. The proper uses of bam yard manure have made the theme for a. great deal of talk. We have all agreed upon its great value for land and we have all recognized the fact that we cannot get enough of it to maintain fertility. And so has he arisen question, what shall we use instead ? Our Secretary said clover, and most of us agree ; but here is Mr. Beeoher, who said timothy would do just as well. Of course we shall not all agree in aU matters, but to him who thinks, and from whose eyes the scales of prejudice have fallen, through these discus- sions truth shall be made to appear. Ex- travagant statements are sometimes made and possibly allowed to pass, but it is our habit to offer combat at once whenever there appears a monstrous form of wrong. Some- thing has been said informer meetings about educating our chUdreu and the best ways of interesting them in our business. I remem- ber one prominent member of this club let Jihe remark drop, that a good common school education was enough for any farmer's chil- dren. Was he in earnest ? I would give my children all the education my means 18 would permit and their capacity allow, even to passing them through the best colleges, and any other courses, which would add to the sum of their knowledge. I would sur- round their home and minds with every ob- ject of interest and of beauty. I would in every way provide the means of satisfying their inquiring minds. We talked of beautifying homes at a re- cent meeting, and I say now, whoever, hav- ing a home, shall read that discussion and fail to add some ■ beauty to his home is not worthy to be of us. That is indeed a happy subject. There is none so poor that his home cannot have some new beauty. Let all remember the more love there is within the home, the more beauty there will be. and with these there comes the reward which attends well-doing — happiness. Our last meeting more unfortunate than ever before assumed to discuss agricultural papers and strayed to papers not agricul- tural. Of course we should be particular in what we say,not as precise as in forms of law, but at least particular to treat all interests fairly. One of our city papers has seen fit to publish a pointed article relating to that discussion and incidentally to this Club. I except to the tenor of the article. There is blame with us no doubt, and it is certain there is blame with the papers, but let it be understood we do not attack our city papers. No one has said aught against the Gazette Supplement, and yet it is represented in the article, that Mr. MoCann did condemn it. — It is true the market reports were criticized. It may be we do not all understand the dif- ficulties in the way of the reporter who collects the information. Take the matter hoine : I found last season summer butter quoted twenty-five cents, and for some time sold mine at that price, because on inquiry I found that was the regular rate, but after a time a dealer who wanted it said he would give me thirty cents, but I must say nothing. Well, I| took the thirty and said nothing. How are the papers to get hold of such transactions ? And yet they are going on all the time in hay and grain and every thing else that goes to mar- ket. What we want is a Board of Trade to give authority to markets. Perhaps the transactions are not large enough but we may be assured such as they are they will con- tinue to be irregular until we have establish- ed such a board. And now there is one other matter in the Gazette article against which I must enter an emphatic protest. It is said that the success of this institution has depended on and does now depend on W. A. Armstrong. It is ab- surd. We know better. Must we admit that we are so low that but one of us all can perform his labor ? I indignantly spurn the idea. There are many who could take his place and do his work. And then if we are not reported at all, are we to die out ? Certainly not. We should continue to exist. I admit with a restricted field of useful- ness, but with us no lack of interest. We cheerfully give credit to the papers for all they have done for us but let them not for- get that there is an obligation on both sides. I know of several subscribers, who take the city papers solely on account of the reports of these discussions, and I know too, that we buy extra copies to send to our friends abroad, all of which must be of some benefit to the publishers. Let us be fair on both sides. I admit the cheapest pur- chase I make is the weekly newspaper, with its narration of events, chapters of accidents, market reports and a hundred other things, j ust what my family and I happen to want, at a cost of less than five cents. I cannot estimate their value too highly. It is per- fectly proper for us who are farmers to wish these same papers might give us more agri- cultural matter, but that would not suit all, and we do not complain. We ask only, that what they do toward us be fair, and we ex- pect also to be fair. If they cease to Tise our reports we shall not cease to exist, and we shall prove to ourselves as well as to others, that we are under no especial obligation to any reporter, and that the Gazette errs egre- giously, when it says Mr. Armstrong is so necessary to our existence, or if it supposes there are not others with us whd could do his work as well. O. S. MoCann— This club I call my home. 19 Ever since it was formed I have taken a great interest in it, and I have learned mucli tlirough. it. I think I have learned more from smaU farmers because their experience cen- tres more in single things. I have been a thousand times interested in these discus- sions, and believe noTv there is not one in ten of our farmers who may not learn some use- ful lesson here — not that we claim to be wiser than others, but here is the place where our experiences are told and views compared. ' We talk with freedom, as we should. We do not always agree, but we may disagree in terms not offensive. I do not agree with what the Gazette said of me this week. I had spoken freely of the paper, and can substantiate what I said, but I will not charge upon it as its editor did upon me — falsehood. I have been looking over the files, and I find abundant proof of the fault I named — especially in the year 1871 in quo- tation of meat, dressed hogs and barley — I hive not looked through the late yearSi It is enough to know its own columns bear out the truth of my statements. Now in regard to the "Illustrious Monthly Sup- plement" (I must be precise — that is the title by which the Gazette designates it in our last report), I never meant to say anything to its djti-iment. I never have said such a. word, and I am qmte ready to say now what I believe is true, that the "Supplement" alone is quite worth the cost of the paper — two dollars a year. I regard the "Supple- ment" as worth more than the Gazette itself, and yet in the article assailing me, the editor says I would take this "source of pleasure" from homes. Oh, no ! I don't want the "Supplement" stopped, nor do I want any home deprived of the pleasure it gives. There is one other matter — an allusion to my experience, when the editor, elegant as usup,l, speaks of "slopping over." The phrase is new to me, but I think I know what it means, and may properly style it an offensive slur. Mr. Pletchee Cakr.— In looking back over the past few years we find great im- provement in i ournalism . Not long ago none of the weekly newspapers except a few of the greatest in the great uitius gave any upaoe or attention to agricultural matter — no local paper had any notice of our business. Note nowthe change. Every town, village and hamlet has its newspaper giving more or less attention to farm mat- ters; furnishing weU prepared reports of Club meetings. Granges, or giving well written articles by farmers who have stud- ied to some purpose. All this shows that agrioultm'e is making rapid strides in im- provement and that it is already raised to a higher plane. The difficulties o£ making complete and accurate market reports are great as any of us may learn if we go into the market to en- quire prices. I think if the Elmira Farmers' Club would devise any plan to add to the completeness of the statements, the city pa- pers would be very glad to adopt the im- provement. But there is one thing of which we may justly complain — the disposition to fill their columns with blood-curdling de- tails of horrid crimes. Why not shorten their hideous proportions? I concede the right to chronicle crime, but spare us the disgusting details and save this space for matter of real utility. I am not referring to our papers alone. All over the country there is this disposition to hunt the sensa- tional and the revolting. Mr. James McCANN^With others here I say there is benefit in these discussions. I too, remember well the first one, and I re- member that it was much talked of for six months afterward and that it excited thought. So, too, another discussion of the ways of seeding to grass, wherein I recom- mended crops giving the least shade, and President Hoffman said, sow no other crop with grass seed. The idea was new, but I have become almost a convert. I have sowed grass seed in that way and I have seen it done successfully by others. So have I been benefitted by the ideas here expressed about trimming trees — the proper time and man- ner, and how to heal the wounds. The last discussion, running on newspa- pers, seems to have excited some feeling, but I think there is nobody much hurt. Readers 20 will look to see what is said on the matter this week and may perhaps be amused — I hope not hurt. There is no doubt this Club is known fa- vorably or otherwise, over a wide extent of country, and the newspapers have been the agency through which our doings are dissem- inated. I was in Albany this week with President Hoffman and had the pleasure of seeing him congratulated on every hand because of his position with us. And what was surprising, he was so well known and so often pointed out as the President of the Elmira Farmers' Club. Mr. Cake reiterated his ideas about re- porting, and declared he often arose with trembling because he knew that what he should say would be put in the papers. He believed many were deterred from speaking by the fear of appearing in print. Loud call made for "Chapman,'' aroused Dave Billings from a comfortable doze, and understanding the word " Chaplain," he sprang to his feet with a profusion of apolo- gies for not before appearing. Butevennowhe declared he could not address the chair on the questionbef ore the house,because he had given all the energies of his mind to the illustra- tion of the forttcoming volume of discus- sions, and was never more troubled than at that moment, by the effort to devise cuts to represent the grotesque attitudes of speakers who had preceded him. Certain animal profiles would do in some cases, and the bird of wisdom should stare from the opposite page on the reported remarks of some sapient members, and at last subsiding. Mr. S. A. Chapman, respondui Lo the call : Since the formation of this Club I have never ceased to have a deep interest in all its affairs. I know I have learned much. I know that I am prepared to be a better farmer through the means employt^d here. These meetings have given me much pleasure as well as profit, and I have been benefitted also by a better acquaintance with my neighbors. As to the newspapers which have come up for remarks, I can say that they are welcome visitors to my house for about nine months of the year. I read with interest both the Advebtisee and the Gazette and my family have a like interest, but in the other three months we can spare them as well as not — that is during the time of a political campaign when they wUl both tell untruths. AUusion has been made to the hesitation shown by some members, who are well able to speak. I confess to that feeling myself and must say that at the first, I could hardly overcome the reluctance caused by the fear that something might get into print to make me feel unpteasant. But that has worn off. I have learned that I wOl be taken care of, and for such care I am under a weight of obligation to the reporter. Mr. Beeohee. — I have read our city papers' for the last nineteen years and I regard the Advebtisee 'End the Gazette as both valu- able. Both are much improved within the past few J'ears. It is well to take both be- cause you thus get more full local news and other matters of interest. It has just been said that both are untruthful during politi- cal campaigns. Now, really, there has been very great improvement in their tone within three years past. They are more truthful in politics, and in fact there is no particular disagreement between the papers so far as politics are cencemed. [Dave suggests here the image of a dove.] SELECTION OF SEEDS. Satl'Iid.^y, Jan. 31, 1874. The fine moonlit evening and the interest in the subject brought out a full attendance, an unusual proportion of which came with something to say. The first matter was an inquiry from a Big Flats farmer, how to get rid of scab in his sheep, to which Mr. D. E. Howell said ; He will find it very difficult in winter, but in mild weather a strong decoc- tion of tobacco thoroughly applied wiU ef- fect a cure. Mr. Edwabd Wakd— If he has but a few, let him kill them — it is the best way. If he undertakes to cure them by a tobacco wash 21 in this weather, he must shear them, and that will kill them without the wash. An inquiry from a lady about washing with hard water unfortunately had been long overlooked, but will be submitted to farmers' wives familiar with the processes, and an- swered at the next meeting. President Hoffman having been absent at the last meeting was, according to the cus- tom, assigned to the opening of the subject — selection of seeds — and said : The proper selection of seeds I look upon as a subject of the greatest importance to the farmer. By due attention to this matter he can change the entire character of a crop within a few years. He can make vast changes in the line of improvement. The wonderful possibilities are well illustrated in the flowering annuals, which by a fewyears of careful selection, have developed plants of such different character and bloom as to look like new species. With farm seeds there is none more readily improved by selection than com. Within ten years merely by se- lection, the character of the ears may be so changed as to form a distinct variety. This is more easy than with oats, or wheat be- cause the ears having more size, extra quality is more easUy discerned, but with sufficient pains, I do not doubt as great changes may be wrought in the smaller grains. The president exhibited two ears of dent com, remarkable for their size and the per- fect development of the grains, and said : — These ears I took out of the crib in the dark, and regard them as a fair sample of the lot, and yet this com comes by selection from the small white flint com without dent, raised on the same farm since 1^36 or 1837, with the product of a single ear to establish the dent. Many years ago an ear was brought from Oliio and planted in the gar- den, and the product planted on one side of the fleld adjoining the flint the following year, and with this exception all the seed has been raised on the place since the date named. It was desired to produce the dent- ed com, and by selection this was accom- plished to such a degree as to make many of the ears too light, and that again corrected by selection, without change of seed. I do not say that changes so noticeable can bo produced in all our crops, but this principle illustrated in the com can be profitably worked in all our seeds. I met recently a gentleman from St. Law- rence county, largely engaged in the culture of beans. He expects to plant next season one hundred and twenty-five acres, and when I saw him he had the ground nearly plowed. Now, for all that planting, he told me he should have the seed selected three times — twice by caref id men, and the last time he should do it himself or entrust it to some man especially trustworthy. And after all this care he intends to- select from the whole crop. He suggested that it is not well to look for the largest seeds, whether of corn, or beans, or potatoes. In all, he regards the medium in size better. Said he, "I would not breed from monstrosities; a large horse, overgrown, is not as good as the average in size. So with the potato and so with the man." Which I thought a modest conclu- sion for him, for he must measure full six and a half feet in height. The principle is, medium size seeds are likely to have more perfect development and greater vitality. The corn I have shown you is increased in size of kernel one-half over the original white flint, but that had a cob as long as these, or even longer. We have shelled the tips and butts from the ears and used the rest for seed, with the idea that the rejected kernels were im- perfect. The main point is to get seed as nearly perfect as possible in all the require- ments, and so continue to select. I believe whoever sows ten acres or five acres of wheat will be will paid if he will take down his sheaves in the winter, and cull from them the best heads for all his seed. It would be well if he could have this done at the har- vest, but there is too much hurry. Such se- lection should be made at least every second year, and if the labor should seem too great, at least enough could be carefully selected to sow for seed, thus using the product of the selection. I believe, too, it is better to raise our own seeds than to depend upon professioned growers. Of course, we need change from 22 different localities in some of tlie crops. — Oats seem to do better on our low lands when the seed is brought from the up land, and the reverse is also advantageous. Still, care mnst be taken in changing seed pro- duced in other localities. This corn would not do to take North whei'e the season Is shorter than here, but if I were going to plant in Virginia, I would use it. We get heavy oats from Vermont, or some other northern placQ, and they grow lighter with us. I think mainly because of our careless culture. I believe if we should sow only the best kernels we could keep the quality up. It would be well to try this selection with oats by casting seed over the floor, the heav- iest going the farthest, or by an arrange- ment of the sieves in the fanning mill to get the heavieat and use them for seed. Now, in regard to garden seeds, many of us are troubled because those we buy wiU not grow. I believe the real secret, in very many instances is, their vitality is lost by age. Seedsmen, I believe, gather up the unsold of one year and mix with the new seed for the next year's sales, and there are many kinds of seeds, that when old, will not germinate. Some lose vitality after one year; some after two, while others retain it indefinitely. Especially those kinds which are worthless when old, should be produced at home and careful selections oonstaiitly made to improve quality. Get as near as you can to the standard you have fixed, and raise such from the specimens selected. If for instance you have a desire to produce cabbage of a given form and quality, find that which approaches the nearest, and from that get your seed and the heads grown from that seed, some of them at least will come nearer your standard. From them raise seed again and so continue, and you will estab- lish just the variety you seek. I confess I have not been successful in producing good cabbage seed, but it is because I have not learned how. 3Ir. James McCann — Take good sound heads in the spring and set out just as they were when pulled in the fall. Now when the seed sprouts start, one will grow right throught the middle of the head, from that save the seed. Break off all the others. The late Mr. Horning, gardener, practiced this method and I used to buy plants of him, always more vigorous than any obtained elsewhere, and of late I have attended to the raising of such for myself and such seed always came up. President Hoffman — It is notorious that many seedsmen produce seed from very infe- rior plants and put such seed on the market. The small, ill-formed beets and carrots, small potatoes, and other produce rejected in the market, but having the power to produce seed are set out by firms and we buy the seed. Can we expect with such a start to come out with the best products ? James McCann. — I find my peas deterio- rate if I undertake to use the seed I raise. It is better to send every year to Canada for the seeds if you would have early peas. Mr. John Beidgman — A great deal of the timothy seed that comes into our market is skinned or hulled und I believe it will not grow as well as soiind whole seeds. I am particular ip buying to get if possible that which is threshed by the flail. It is quite a serious matter, to be cheated out of the grass seeding when your laud is ready, and I take much pains to get seed which is sure to grow. On one occasion I took home from a dealer a sample of the pulled timothy seed, and made every effort to sprout it in the house but could not, and I say therefore it is not good. I believe it will not grow any more than will hulled buckwheat. Mr. Edward Ward — If you take a very ripe head of timothy and shell it in your hand carefully, you will find this same skin- less condition which I attribute to over ripeness. I cannot say such seed wiU grow. Mr. D. E. Howell — I bought once several bushels of old timothy seed and sowed it but it did not grow. The fault I thought was in the age. Mr. J. McCann— How old must it be to lose vitality ? Mr. Wilkes Jenkins — After ten or fift;:en 23 years kept in manure it will grow, as I can vouch from having seen it. Mr. McCann — On my wheat last fall I sowed timothy seed cut three years before, and it came up well. President Hoffman — There is no doubt that old seeds require a longer time to ger- minate. Wheat for instance a year old sowed by the side of new seed will be several days later in coming up. I believe any seed is better if not thoroughly ripe. Certainly it is quicker to grow and the plants seem to have more vigor. Mr. Geo. Conqdon — Is there any seed quite' as good to grow, and as likely to pro- duce a good crop, after it is more than a year old ? President Hoffman — No, I believe not. Mr. BiLLiNos — It is claimed by gardeners that cabbage seed improves by age within certain limits — ^tliat the heads produced from old seed are firmer and in other respects better. Mr. CoNQDON — In malting barley, I have noticed that old requii'es more time. We sometimes get a lot in which there is a mix- ture of old, which I suppose farmers put in through ignorance, but we -never fail to find it in the malting. Barley a year old wUl grow, but it will take three days longer than the new to start the spear and root, so of course they cannot be malted to- gether. ' Last year I malted fifteen hundred bushels of old barley, and after that experi- ence I say now I would not undertake to do it again and to dispose of the malt if the grain were given to me. I can't get the quality — it looks good but it won't yield. Honey is the only thing that can take the place of barley malt, but it will not keep well. I have seen old barley sowed, but it didnpt come evenly like new seed, and barley to be excellent miist be even and ripen together Five years ago I bought of 0. H. Fitch a lot of barley that weighed but forty-one pounds to the bushel, and I let it go for seed to be sown on Caton HiUs. The farm- ers who took it were influenced by its being the cleanest lot I had. I was afraid it would not do well, but in the fall those men brought me the crop raised from that seed, and I never saw prettier barley. It weighed plump forty-eight pounds and was without fault. Mr. Bbidqman — I bought oats on the bill two years ago for seed, and my crop raised from them was lighter in weight than the seed. President Hoffman — Were the oats heavier than if raised from your own seed ? Mr. Bbidgman — They were, but we cannot on our flat land keep up the character of oats raised on the hills. Mr. J. S. Hoffman — And we cannot get as good barley on these pine plains as on the hills. President Hoffman — We aU know that these flats will not produce as good barley, but will it not always be better to bring seed from the hills, thereby insuring better grain than if the seed were grown on the flats ! And may it not be better also for the hiU fariners to take their seed from the flats ? With com this would not do, because frost would interfere with the change. So with Mr. McCann' s early peas. He goes to Canada where there is a shorter season, and he finds peas acclimated and adapted to the curtailed season — he brings them here, and for a, single season they preserve something of their acquired character, but they soon begin to adapt themselves to our season, and he therefore finds it necessary to get new seed. Now if he were to go to Norfolk and get peas which are called early there, he would find them late here, but in adapting to our season they would the next year be earlier. All seeds tend to adapt their growth to the changed circumstances. Take our flint corn to the west and it will dent. J. S. Hoffman. — I have seen our yeUow com taken to the Wabash valley by a man who was going late in the spring, and so wanted our earlier corn to plant there. I saw the ci;op and it all dented the first sea- son. 24 Mr. EvEEETT — A Minnesota farmer, asked: Didn't dent corn grow near to cause the change by mixing ? It will dent though as Mr. Hoffman says. I, too, have seen it in Minnesota. Henry Matthews took there some of our small seed and that dented. Our rule in changing seed is to take seed from the timber lands to use on the open prairie and from the prairie to the timber lands. Mr. Jenkins. — I think the benefit of the change comes through the different soils rather than the localities, in our neighbor- hood changes. You get seed from the hills and it is usually raised on clay, while on these flats it is gravel or loam. Now if you should bring seed from a gravel or loam soil on the hill I think there would be not much advantage in the change. Mr. Waed enquired if any one had known wheat raised from seed continuously pro- duced on one farm as long as six years. Mr. EvEBETT. — Yes, ten or twelve years, and the quality kept good. Mr. Ward. — When I came into this vaUey I found a man who had so raised wheat six years, and his crop was one-fourth chess. Mr. McCann asked if it was advisable to cut seed potatoes ? Mr. J. S. Hoffman — They are betterplant- el whole. Mr. Fletches Cakr — I have experimented in this matter for the last five years, and I find that the whole seed comes up quicker and I think produces better potatoes. Mr. J. E. CoNKLiN — Something depends on the variety, the early rose for instance, with too much seed is not so early, besides more small potatoes are produced ; so with that variety, I prefer cut seed and small pieces in the hiU. Mr. Billings ui-ged that if we are to be- lieve the sworn statements of men, who claim to have produced all the way from three hundred to six hundred pounds from one, an argument would seem to be furnished in fa- vor of cutting. Mr. J. S. Hoffman — But how about the land planted with single eyes, as in such in- stances where the object is to propagate a variety ? The President — There is the difBculty. They make great yields according to the seed, and small yields as it regards acres planted. Mr. BiLLiNftS — The president has made his argument in favor of raising our own seed, while I have given some attention to the matter, and while I have been successful in producing good seed, I have been able to procure equally good or even better by buy- ing. He thinks the old seed is gathered in from the retail dealers and mixed with the new. It may be true, but I have for some years bought my seed from James Vick, of Eoohester, and never failed to get fresh and good. Mr. CoNGDON— Do you buy it here or send to Vick ? Mr. Billings — I send direct to him. Mr. Howell — Why not buy here cheaper ? Mj. Billings — Because I did not know his seed could be procured of our dealers and besides don't Mr. HoweU know I like to put on style by sending abroad and paying more ? Mr. S. M. Cakk— It has been my practice to raise my own garden seed until within the last few years, having grown careless I have bought, and with very poor fortune. Last year aU the seeds I bought failed. Cabbage, I obtained from three or four sources and it all failed. I had nothing to succeed except a very few beets, and I attribute the failure to the old seed, as suggested by the President. In raising we must be particular to get the best, and also to gather just at the right time. Better take aU the care than to be imposed on by dealers with worth- less seed. Mr. CoNQDON — Erom six papers of parsnip seed, which I bought and sowed last year, I had just six parsnips. Mr. Billings— I know Mr. Carr ig skillful, but I must attribute his failure to other 25 causes than poor seed. He has not closely observed his cabbage, and guarded the ten- der shoots from the depredations of insetts- The tiny plants will come up in the morning, and if the state of the atmosphere is favor- able, a little flea will light upon them and in twenty-four hours destroy all. Or if there is a long dry time just after the sowing, and then a beating rain, the earth is packed so hard the plants cannot push through. I insist that cabbage and turnip seed are both good, with unimpaired vitality, if they are kept as old as he is. Mr. HowEiiL — I saw yesterday a dealer in timothy seed with samples from Canada, and he was told by our dealers that they could do as well or better than to take his, in Chi- cago. He said he never sold his fine seed in Chicago, but he did sell them his inferior seed — what he called the tailings. Mr. Billings — I wouldn't buy his fine seed and take his promise to deliver. Discussion running on to pumpkins grew facetious and the President promptly closed it.. PLANNING FOK SPKING. Satukday Evening, Feb. 7, 1874. Strangely enough, there are men with high credit for success in farming, who visit the Club week after week and listen with appa- rent interest to all that is said, but can never be provoked to interject a word — until after the President declares discussion closed, and the meeting adjourns, when these same men at once become the most voluble Solons, from whose lips issue little rivulets, broad streams, great floods of wisdom. No presid- ing officer knows how to call them out. Per- haps there is nothing to come out until the leaven has leavened the whole lump. Cer- tainly they do not rise until after the meet- ing is closed. The attendance at this meet- ing was rather less than usual, but comprised farmers from several of the surrounding towns. The true scope of the question was apparently not perceived by all, and as usual there were disagreements, good-natured, critical and captious. The Club library continues to receive notice, especially from the younger members and from ladies, many of whom visit the Club at every session to exchange books. The librarian always opens the hall an hour in advance of the regular discussion to afford proper time and facilities for the selection of books. An inquiry by Mrs. AUen about washing with hard water was referred to a member whose wife is known to be an excellent ' house-keeper, and she replies : "Use sal soda at the rate of half a pound to the barrel of water if moderately hard, and more if very hard. The water must be drawn and the soda thrown in ten or twelve hours before using in order to give time for the lime to precipitate. When used, dip it carefully without disturbing the sediment. The same result can be attained by the use of good, strong, wood ashes, taking two quarts tied in a bag and thrown in thte water a few hours before using. Of course ley will accomplish the same change by neutralizing the lime but there is danger in its use, that if strong the hands would be likely to be made sore.'' After the usual preliminary business the President caUeil the subject and Mr. Samuel A. Chapman, who said : Farming stands at the head of all business. Upon its success depends the success of the merchant, the mechanic, and all classes and kinds of useful business. It is therefore of the first importance that the farmer should have his plans well laid to insure the successful production of food for all, and if possible a reasonable degree of profit for himself. He should know now just what fields to plow in the coming spring and where he will cut the grass for his cat- tle. Now is the time to perfect his plans, while the ground is locked by frost, and there is time for thought. Very many aids to success can now be arranged, which if left to spring, must then in the hurry and pres- sure of work be neglected. If I may men- tion some of those provisions which should be made now for the coming season, I should say first there is nothing which looks more satisfactory to the tired farmer than his shed well stored with wood prepared for burning, and I advise that such provision be made before the first of April ; otherwise there is little likelihood 26 that it be ilonu at all. We all know that it is very unpleasa-nt to have a call for wood, when we come tired from the field and get that wood, must in some way be had. It is true economy to provide it now. Another matter which should now receive attention is the putting of farm tools in effi- cient order. The harrow teeth, if not sharp, should at once Ije sharpened ready for use. It does not look vrell for the farmer to be at the shop with such a job at the very time when his harrow should be at work in the field. Another requirement is the prepara- tion of seed sra^i'i which is sure to be done better if done now, liecause there is time to use. If you have not good seed, now is the time to look about and find it, and to put what you have through the mill, making it as pure and clean as you can, ready to cast on the field. It never pays to use poor seed if good can 1 le obtained at any co-^t of labor or time. Many fai-mers make terrible mistakes in the treatment of their animals. It is the custom with some to turn their horses out to pick their living as they may, aided only by a straw stack and late in March or April, to take up the poor animals and give a little grain as a fitting for severe labor at the opening of spring. I teU you a horse taken from such keeping can not be made ready for service in one or two weeks. The true way is to use him moderately all winter that he may be hardened for the excessive strain to 1 >e put upon him in spring. We have all observed that more horses are lost in the busy spring than at any other season, and I have no doubt that the real cause is the imperfect fitting for labor, rather than the excess of labor. Good trusty helji must be sought now if at all, and having found it, I recommend pay- ino- liberal wage.-i. With help of this char- ter you can att'ord yood pay better than with careless laljorers without any pay. I have but indicated a few of the import- ant matters that demanrl attention now. AH the plans for spring must be arranged now, if thi' work is to go forward in good order. It is cheaper, easier and in every way better to enter upon the work with plans and pre- parations complete. Mr. James McCann furnished his quota of thought in the following suggestive paper, which he passed to the Secretary to read : "No time of the year is strictly a period of rest with the industrious farmer, yet the long winter coolpels a cessation of out of door work and gives time for thought and study within the warm rooms of home. Now is the time for the farmer to arrange plana for the coming year for without plans no good end can be certainly attained. Hence he should determine during these long win- ter evenings exactly what fields he shall plant with each crop, the quantity and char- acter of manure he will apply, and form an estimate of the results he hopes to attain. Some may say that all this is visionary, or building castles in the air. In my view it is prudence and good judgment. Admitting that all may not occur in exact accordance with the plan laid down ; it then becomes the farmer to show himself a good general also and to devise and adopt a new plan suited to the altered circum- stances aud this may be done all the more readily if the winter studies have been thorough and comprehensive. No good general cammences a campaign without first having made a plan with all the influ- ences that may cause him to deviate there- from, carefully studied and how such lines of deviation may lead to success. The year's work of the farmer is nothing but a campaign agaiust weeds and insects and adverse influ- ences, in the struggle to di'aw from the soil the fruits and vegetables, the grain and the grasses which furnish the necessary sub- sistance for himself and his dependants in the march thi-ough life. All this must be done in spite of drouth or insects. He must retrieve disaster and conquer disease in his cattle, it he would find profit in leading them fat to the shambles or with the fading year if he would send them into winter quarters ncreased in numbers and sound in health. — To accomplish all these ends, and to win every fight isjno easy task, and requires much care- ful preliminary thought. Now is the time for it. Soon the snow will 27 have passed away and the mellow ground be ready for the plow and the seed, and then, if no plan has been formed, the farmer will be but little better than a ship at sea without rudder or com- pass. He will be behind in the beginning and a laggard at the harvest— while his neighbor who has his plans well made will be early in sowing, early in reaping, and early in the market, thvis securing the profits of spring prices. There may seem to be, with some of us. much difiioulty in forming such plans, but really, nothing is more easy, if we give care- ful thought to the work. We must look over the fields and carefully note the differ- ent requirements, by which we shall be able to decide what seeds to sow and what fertili- zers to use. Having done all this, he will find profit, as the season advances, in jotting down performances, with such observations as he may make about weather and dates of the various operations of plowing, sowing and harvesting, together with a record of the growth and changes in his crops. This will afford him tTlfe means for better calculations in the succeeding year. — Will he refuse to do this because it is so much trouble ? Let him once begin and hs wiE be surprised to see how much interest there is in the record of facts which serve not only to guide his present work, but to lead to the use of greater intelligence in future operations." . President HoFrMAsr — I think I do too much planning, and that I carry out too few of my nicely arranged plans. My wife says I build castles in the air, and so say all who know me. I have plans now ten years old and not yet executed, but I am striving in that direction. Those plans are not written down in a brilliant volume, such as they might make, but they are stored away in memory, and I look them over often, and at least have pleasure in that.. For the last six months I have been planning ditches which are not yet dug. I have been looking after the details, and the other day I happened to speak aloud of my subject of thought, in the presence of a gentlemen who had given much attention to drainage, and he gave me a hint which wiU save me hundreds of dollars. There is profit then in thinking and laying plans for the future. The fact is the improvements in our farms and our business grow out of carefully ar- ranged plans, and I venture the remark that we cannot plan too much, unless we fail en- tirely to execute. Mr. Samuel M. Cake — One of our present needs is to see how our work can be advanced by the use of new and improved imple- ments, for the fact stands out with promi- nence that labor has advanced beyond other things since our late civil strife ; while the products of th6 farm have settled back to old values, labor costs twice as much as it did in 1861, and we must govern ourselves ac- cordingly. He who wbrks one hundred or two hiindred acres of laud must have help of some sort, but let him ask, will it pay ? I say it will not pay to employ labor at the present prices and we must therefore depend upon implements. I an thankful that 1 can get four or five days' work in one by the use of the mower and my horses, and now we want in the other departments of the farm similar aids, or our lamls must lie left in idleness. Of course at this season it is im- portant that everything be put in order for work, that there may be no delay when the busy season comes. Every possi- ble aid must be had and used, if there is to be an adequate return for farm labor. Lands must be drained and otherwise put in the best condition. And beyond all this, care of the family ib a special subject for the farm- ers' thoughts. With three or four sons able to help, he may feel sorely tempted to deny the privileges of school. Let him consider well if he has a son with the promise of use- fulness to be developed through study. He has no right to sacrifice the bright hopes of ambitious young manhood to his own good. Let him so plan his work that the young man of promise can develop his talent, for the world will want to vise it. Mr. Chapman — About seventeen years ago in a store in this place I noticed a single kernel of com which wasfarge and showy, but had something like a frosted look. Speaking of it, the proprietor told me it came from the 28 Hoffman farm. Some time after, passing by the old man's place, I called to make further inquiries about the corn, and the result of my visit was that I brought away some of that corn for seed, and I planted it on hill land and it grew enormously, and yielded as good a crop as I ever saw grow. I continued the use of that seed, always getting good crops for a few years, when it got mixed, and I .went back to the original source with like success and result, too, for that mixed from a neighbor's corn across the road. I went then to a son of the old man and got the same variety, which yielded as before. I mention this success, continiTod through many years, because it was the direct result of an attention to small matters. If I had waited until time to plant I should never have had an ear of that seed nor the profits therefrom. In the hui-ry of the season I should each year have planted from my own crib, and should not have had as many dollars as I have now. Mr. Wilkes W. Jenkins — If we keep an accurate account of all our operations I think we shall not find much profit. If such ac- counts had been kept by all the members of this body for years past, in my opinion there would be no Farmers' Club here now, for the success noted would be so small that we should long ago have been driven into other business. Charge up the labor ive do at the prices we have to pay for what we hire, and there is nothing left after paying up the bill. And then we cannot estimate results, as the merchant or the blacksmith can. There are too many elements to enter into the calculation. We may provide certain time and labor for gathering the hay, and while the calcula- tions would do for fair weather, there comes a series of rainy days and we find the cost and trouble more than double our estimates. There is no fixed criterion by which we can measure cost and residts. ■> Mr. Pletchek Cabk — Such remarks from such a source are quite sirrprisiug and at va- riance with the facts. We can keep accu- rate records at least of all that we do and by these records determine the question of profit and loss and so be better prepared to act in- telligently in future ventures. I have kept such records and can tell you now the exact cost of each crop I raised in 1873, the num- ber of day's Ijbor in each field and the re- turns therefrom. On some fields I find I have lost and on others I have made nice profit. It does pay well to keep such ac- counts, and it is a shiftless lack of method to conduct a farm without. A few days ago I called on Mr. EockweU and found him engaged in preparing seed for the coming spring, putting it through the mill and fitting it thoroughly for immediate use. I was pleased with his forethought, and I am sure he will have his reward. If he should defer that extra labor to the busy season of spring it would not be done at aU and he would have diminished crops. And there is another field in which we should all begin exploration, the great field of experi- ment. Where would be the telegraph novf but for the persistent experiments of Morse, or the ocean cable but for the continued struggles of Field ? Shame on those men who pi-ate of discouragement, where there is good hope of abundaSt reward. We may fail in some things, we shall not in all. I at- tempted improvement in the culture of strawberries, and I lost the beds, but I gained knowledge. I lost a baiTel of'apples m testing the ways of keeping, but I learned how to save an infinite number of other bar- rels. This field of experiment is open to all and if every member of this Club would spend a little of his time working it, we should surely discover new sources of profit. Ct. S. McCann. — Eight, all through his speech. And now after making two dollars, try to save it, or spend it for good pui-poses. Crockett's adage is still good "First see you're right then go ahead." Mr. Seely I. Chapman. — It is possible to go too fast, quite right to get all ready, but not to hurry always so soon as Spring opens. I have a neighbor who sowed a nine acre field ef oats last spring, and the field was capable of producing fifty bushels to the acre but he harvested a little less than five. He hurried too much, his ground was wet and he sowed because he couldn't wait, while others 29 were getting their seed in drier ground. I tried the same thing on two acres when my horses would sink at every step to the let- looks because the land was wet. I didn't get half a crop. We have to wait. Our neighbors on their gravelly soils can sow be- fore we can stir on our clay hiUs, but let us wait until the ground is ready and ourselves well prepared and we shall not come out second. MAEKETING CBOPS. Sathbdat EvENiNo, Feb. 14, 1874. Much of the session was devoted to cor- respondence, of which but a small portion is of general interest. Several inquiries re- lating to spring wheat offered by Mr. Everett of Minnesota, for seed, at a recent meeting, have reached the Club and been duly ans- wered. They suggest the propriety of briefly advertising the seed with the price, in the weekly newspapers. J. E. L., Big Flats, writes — "I notice, in the discussion bytheCoimty Agricultural Society at Breesport, a recommendation to sow buck wheat, rye and grass seed all together. I wish you would call out the experiences of the Club, as I have a low wet piece to seed dcwn which on account of the wet I can not sow until too late for good oats. If the plan is possible I would like to put the same in practice." He must remember an important paa^t of the instruction, relating to this mode;, was the necessity for repeated plowings, insisited on by "Old Jo Kice" the Breesport speaker. His statements were based on truth. There are some portions of Steuben county where the plan is often adopted. The grass-seed can be delayed until the following spring if J. K. L. is in doubt about the catch when sown as directed — or better stiU, sow a portion heavy with timothy and clover at the time of sowing the buckwheat and rye, and the remainder sow in the usual way in the next March on the rye, thus affording data for future plans. None of the members in the large attendance of the evening had tried the way proposed. Mr. Fletcher Carr re- ported an erperiment in a neighbor's field last year, the rye and buckwheat being sown together with u, satisfactory crop of buck- wheat and the rye now promising. Presi- dent Hoffman had been informed of a field in Chemung sown in the same manner with excellent results. The Club advises J. E|. L. to venture, and to re|)ort his management of the field in question from the time of start- ing the plow to final results. So good a far- mer as he will be sure to make thorough preparation by repeated stirring of the soil before the seed is sown, for therein lies much of the hope of success. C. R. Stuart, Watsonville, Maine, having noticed in thd published report of Club dis- cussidns, disparaging remarks about sowed corn, sends his experience. He writes : "The difficulty in curing fodder corn is owing to the size of the stalk. So it occurred to me late in the fall of 1871, that curing might be facilitated by crushing. Accordingly I arranged a pair of wooden rollers to operate something like a clothes wringer, but not brought so close as to squeeze the juice from the stalks. I put through a small quantity which, after crushing, I spread on the ground to dry, but it was too late in the fall — too late for drying anything. I noticed, that it dried quite as fast as some second crop which I out about the same time. I was encouraged to further experiment. So the next year, 1872, I went to the foundry and got a couple of suitable rollers, which I arranged for the work of crushing, and at- tached a horse power, and commenced putting tho stalks through. I crushed four or five tons, but owing to the ex- tremely unfavorable weather it nearly all got more or less damaged before it eoul(| be made sufficiently dry to mow away. Yet my cattle ate it well and seemed to do as well on it as on hay, and it was no small help to me in a year of scarcity, with hay at thir- ty-five to forty dollars per ton. The past year, having a great deal of other work to do, I planted only what corn I wanted to feed green, but I like the plan of crushing so well that I shall get a two-horse power and try it again soon as I am able. I think it is not ^ more expensive than the plans usually adopted, especially when 30 we coiisidur that it can be stowed away in bulk like hay. It can be run through the the machine very fast, and will dry, I should judge, in about the same time as coarse Eng- lish hay." Here is a Yankee' idea astray, for anybody engaged in raising fodder can pick it up. This is the way improved methods are at- tained. Mr. Stuart deserves commendation for his efforts to utilize a crop well nigh worthless to the average farmer, because of the difficulty in curing. "VVe are constantly learning, or at least we ought to be learning. And some of our best farmers have learned that it is more profitable to raise grass than to get enor- mously laarge crops of juicy corn stalks. President Hoffman said labor must be cheap- er in Maine than here — there is less j nice in the stalks to dry out — or the process cannot Ije profitable. There is the carrying to and from the machine, and all the increased hand- ling which can hardly be compensated by the benefit derived from crushing. The subjected selected for discussion was MARKETING CROPS, and the president called Mr. Ezra Rockwell, who said : In order to reach the market with desirable products, and to obtain the good prices which we all desire, the first requisite is the careful selection and cleansing of seed. All foul seeds must be screened out, and then to save further risk and trouble from them they should be chopped into feed (cook- ing would do) and fed out to the cattle in winter. To get the greatest profit from the sale of buckwheat it should be sown early and threshed just as early as possible, free from dirt and at once flou]-ed. If kept late the price invariably declines. Oats, too, should be carried to market early, and to do that very early sowing is necessary. If they cannot be sold early, better hold over to sell in win- ter or spring, because after the first early market is supplied, drooping prices are sure to prevail for a considerable time. My own practice is to sow mixed seed, because two or more varieties wiU yield a greater crop than any single variety. I should recom- mend holding wheat for a good price if it cannot be well sold as soon as thi'eshed. Any time of year will do, and it is a crop which will keep safely. I get my rye fioured in winter, and sell the flour-, which yields as much profit as the whole grain, and leaves the coarse parts to feed. There are proper seasons for all our products, and by observ- ing these much advantage in price is secured^ Cattle which are fed for beef should be well kept until in March or even later, when good prices can always be had, because the supply at that time is always reduced. I am some- times in doubt when to sell potatoes, but when there is a good price I think it is well to take them at once from |:he field to the purchaser. This season it has been profita- ble to hold them over, but that involves a considerable extra labor and care. Mr. Seely p. Chapman — We as producers I suppose are quite as much interested in the markets as the buyers are, and it is our business to observe the proper time and manner of delivering crops. With wheat and barly I have commonly done well by- taking the first market price, getting the thresliing done and delivery made as soon as possible. Later there are fluctuations in the price, sometimes advantageous to one side, and sometimes to the other. I had as lief take the first price, if that is fair, and be satisfied. As to buckwheat, I have usually found that in getting it floured and selling only the flour, I get about as much money as I wovild have if I sold the whole grain, and the bran is left as clean profit. If the price of potatoes is fair in the fall, I would always sell them and save all the risk of rotting, freezing and shrinking, to say nothing of the extra handling involved in keeping for a spring market. I have in past years sold considerable hay, taking it from the meadow and filling barns in the city, and have thought that there was no better way to sell, but I incline now to the belief that farmers, situated so near to market, would do better to hold hay and watch opportunities. With good roads the stables are always supplied from distant farmers, but there are times when they can not draw over long muddy roads, but with the short distance I have to 31 go, I cau take my hay in at such times fix my own pi-ice. and President Hoffman — If you can get forty cents for your potatoes in the fall, how much more should you want in the spring to pay your risk, oai-e and extra labor of handling ? Mr. Chapman— Forty cents from the field in the fall would be quite as good as fifty cents in the spring. I think it would be better. Mr. Charles Hellek — My advice is to market all crops just as soon as they are ready, if prices are fair, for in holding there is always waste from rats and mice, besides in some crops there is a great deal of shrink- age, and in all, risk. W. A. Armstrong — One of the mo^t im- portant requisites is the neat a.nd careful preparation for the market. Let everything be put in the best order, and be of the best quality, and let this become the established character of the farmers' products. Thence- forth there will be no seeking u, market, purchasers will seek the products and always pay the highest rates. Chai-acter counts for a great deal, as it should, and when once established should be vigilantly guarded, the excellent products running into the same channels year after year. Here is our friend Han-is, an excellent dairyman, who believes in character. He puts up his packages in good sweet order, and when he is ready to sell, b uyers swarm upon him and he gets five cents more per pound than other equally good dairies which lack character. He is a good judge of qvial- ity, and I have his word that other butter just as good as his — and that is strictly fine — sells five cents lower, because it has not made reputation. There are customers in New York who await the ari-ival of his dairy every fall, and from it buy their winter sup- ply at advanced rates, because they have learned to have confidence in it. Now this matter of character is scarcely less import-, ant in all the other products of the farm. The true course with a poor article is to sell it as such, or if grain, imperfect in growth or damaged by exposure, feed it to cattle or work it into pork and sell that for just what it is, and it may be excellent. Mr. G. W. HoLBEBT. — I think there is something in being known. I am reminded of an effort I made once to sell a calf in our market. It was good, but as I took it around from place to place, every dealer would blow on quality, and offer me a ridicuously low price until at last I let it go for half what it was worth and learned my lesson, I say, now, any farmer who brings his produce into our market without first having found his customer is a fool — sure to be imposed upon and to get less than the real value. I tried the same thing once with butter and I met the same fate. I said then I would get enough together and send to New Yoi-k, and I have done it ever since, and always with prompt and fair returns. I had some tubs of butter a year or two ago which I wanted to sell here, but the same difficulties arose so I sent it to New York and got eight cents a pound more than I could get offered here. If farmers would get together and send an agent down to make arrangements for the sale of their products there, they would real- ize always a handsome profit above any sales they Can make in this market, and I say so after due trial. Even the grain market here amounts to naught. Millers buy their supplies at the west, and stand quite independent of us. They all want to take the profits off from the producer, and be- tween him and the consumer there are sev- eral profits to be made. A few days ago I saw a farmer dragging a load of poultry about town, and altough it was in nice order the dealers sneered at it as they did about my calf. If he sold it all he had to take a very small price, but I think he had to draw it home again. Now I could have directed him as I can you, where to send and get full returns without any commission taken out. Mr. Billings — Have you found a man in New York who will handle your produce without commission ? How does he sustain himself? He must do a very large business to make his profits. Mr. HoLBERT — He asks a greater price of the consumer — there is the spot where he 32 gets his profit— tut he sends me prompt and full returns. Mr. Billings (an idea peering out under his eye brows)— Oh ! I see ! He don't make anything out of you. He don't want com- missions ! Mr. W. A. WakDj (a formermiller andfar- mer.) In this grain matter Ihave held both ends of the handle in my hands, and may therefore be able to speak of the trueprofits. In my judgment the proper time to sell is any time when there is a fair price and the farmer is ready. It is true, however, that there are certain seasons for some crops, as for instance barley, which has a market until malsters are supplied or have in their stock, and during that time is the proper season for selling because later the want being supplied there is no call and the odds and ends which then come must go for what is offer- ed. The disturbance last fall in the finances has made, it is true, an exception of this year but I venture to say not twice in twenty years has the late market for barley been as good as the early. So of buckwheat there is a time to sell and later prices always drop . But 11 smaller portion of the country produces or uses this grain, and the de- mand is always early and lasts not long. To some extent the time of buying wool is also restricted, but this is an article that may be safely kept over. Wheat is an article in every day demand by every person, and therefore has always a market. If the price is not satisfactory it may be held with a certainty that it will always sell. Our heme demand may make the late market for oats better. I suppose all we raise are con- sumed here, and the farmer may be left to use his own judgment about the time of sell- ing. I svippose there is not a farmer here who may Bot save the coarse parts of his buckwheat to feed his stock, getting asmuch for his flour as he would for the whole grain, and of course serving him as profit. I hear- tily second the remarks of the Secretary about the character of products. Therein is the true secret of satisfactory sales, and then as a rule get the early market, for I do assure you there is enormous waste in hold- ing. There are rats and leaks and shrink- age—perhaps I shall sui-prise you when I say my estimate of losses from all causes, taking in the interest account, will often reach twenty -five per cent, for six months holding. There is much prejudice against speculat- ors in grain, but I assure there is very little grain actually bought up to hold for a rise. Men can, and do speculate as in stocks, make prices for future delivery, but no grain is handled in the operation. It is simply gam- bling, betting on the market. Mr. D. B HovcELL — I have used the Elmi- ra markets many years, and cannot accept the statement made by Mr. Holbert. I have sold many calves, both on good and dull ' markets, on contract and on the street, and the same rule applies here which fits all markets. When there is a fuU supply, of course dealers are not anxious to purchase. Butchers engage their supplies before Thurs- day and there is no difficulty in realizing full prices while they are seeking supplies, but if Mr. Holbert takes his calf in and offers it after there are ah-eady enough on the market he must not be surprised if he has to come down. He is forcing a market. I believe in patronizing our home market, ind there is a great advantage in having such a market. A great deal of inferior products, which would not bear transportation, find a market here. The trade in wool is ticklish, and there are almost as many grades as in butter ; but it has one advantage — there is little or no shrinkage. Some men even claim that if closely packed it will gain slightly in weight by a year's keeping. But for several years past, with good opportunities for observing, I have been satisfied that those who sold immediately after shearing have generally done the best. I know now of a lot for which sixty-five cents was refused two years ago, and the next spring it had fallen to forty-five cents, and now with another clip is awaiting next spring market. As to holding potatoes, I should rather accept forty cents in the fall than sixty cents in the spring, for not to speak of shrinkage and rot, I would not carry them in and out of the cellar for ten cents a bushel. Whoever deals fairly in 33 our Elmira marke1;s will bo fairly treated himself, I have no douht, and I regret to hear disparaging remarks ahout the advan- tages presented by onr home market, for which we ought to be thankful. Mr. HoLBEBT — He is a dealer and wants us to sell our calves to him low. Why, last spring my brother sent three calves, hog- dressed, to New York, and they were only two or three weeks old — bobs. He got thir- ty-two dollars net. He could' nt have sold them to Mr. HoweU for half that. Mr. Howell — No ; I don't deal in bobs. I never have dealt in them. The Pbesident — The best lesson of the evening is in the remarks about honest deal- ing and establishing character. Mr. Geoeoe S. MoCann — Yes ; and next best let us aid the establishment of home manufactories of all kinds, for the workmen will consume our productsi and we shall thus aid ourselves. FARM WASTE. Satukdat Evening, Feb. 21, ISli. All day, the clouds hung down upon the earth and dripped out a continuous drizzle. The roads were horribly muddy and the night dark, biit all these discouragements were not enough to prevent a meeting. There were farmers who had come two miles and more, on foot, to take part in the discussion or to get useful hints tending to the prevention of waste. There was a show of statistics, to prove that the waste of seed, from its own imperfections and poorly prepared soU, and the waste in harvesting, are in this country much more than the tax upon all farms in the county. The recommendation was to dimin- ish the areas in culture without lessening the amount of labor. Thus the one hundred and fifty thousand bushels of wheat now produced annually in Chemung co,unty for which twelve thousand acres are required might as surely be raised on six thousand acres if all the labor expended on the great- er area be concentrated on the smaller area, thus saving one half the seed or "as much as ten thousand bushels in this small oounty, where wheat is not a leading article of pro- duction. And there would be in such a sow- ing a, greater gain in the release of one half the fields from tillage, and therefore a vast increase in grazing • lands and in the fertility of all. The census figures, by which it appears that the annual productions of farms in this county are but two and a quarter millions of doUars, afford plausible arguments to those who insist that farming does not pay. With- out doubt, it does not in the case of those who by their shiftless practices have reached this negative|conclusion, and who seem more anxious to fortify their misery by arguments than to find a way out. Waste does not yield any profit. This meeting yielded as- sent to the proposition, that there is an av- erage loss on the hay crop of fuUy one dollar per ton, amounting to fifty thousand dollars in the county, every year ; and this waste, resulting mostly from over ripeness, might be corrected without the least ' increase of cost or of labor. If it were generally known, that one ton of sweet, early cut hay con- tains much more nutrition than a ton of the later cut, with its greater proportion of woody fibre, a step would be taken toward the prevention of the waste. It is true that farmers look upon all innovations in their practices with suspicious concern. There is no lack of intelligence, but there is steady conservatism bred in from the begin- ning, hence change is adopted with slow caution. In the old days of hand labor it was not possible to gather the hay crop all in its season, and the habits established then are likely to last with the generation. Mr. J. S. Van Duzeh — When I commenc- ed farming I had been trained to business in New York city, where every minute detail of affairs received careful attention. In con- versation with a friend I made the remark, that if farmers gave as close watchfulness to their business, there woiild not be a handful of grass left to waste in the fence comers. It is a small waste perhaps, in the mere loss of hay, but it is common on eome farms to run the mower as near the fence as it is con- venient to drive, and to leave the comers uncut, thus losing the product of so mucll land, and making besides plaoes for the pro- 34: dviction of thistles and other pests, which work in and are left to ripen and distribute their seed. And besides there is a great waste in fences. There is no reason why an ordinary farm should be cut up in four or five acre fields. Oho half the fences in this county are waste and the cost of mainten- ance is enormous. When I commenced busi- ness, I took two adjoining farms, one of which had been poorly tilled and fenced and the other not much better, but the fences furnished plenty of material to enclose large fields for both farms, and I used them to make such fields, effecting a great saving in material, in cost of maintenance and in avail- able land and in my experience thus far, there has resulted from the change no in- covenience. It is difficult to estimate farm waste in fig- ures. There are so many conditions of waste, so many unnoticed losses, including many which in their very nature are inevitable, that we can scarcely approximate the real sum by which our receipts are annually di- minished. In the figures shown us there are the elements of truth. Enough is shown to prove the necessity for greater vigilance. I believe in better tillage as the means of in- creasing farm products. ICevertheless, most farmers do now complain of the difficulty in procuring labor for such tUlage as they give and with then- extra efforts to achieve excel, lence, they believe they do not attain ade- quate rewards. I attempted thorough tillage in a field, in preparation for wheat and I had as my reward an enormous crop, but the next year with labor lavishly applied, as be- fore, I was forced to accept a yield of but five bushels per acre. We have to meet dis- couragements quite out of our power to pre- vent. We must depend, after all our efforts are put forth iipon favorable conditions of the elements. Perhaps these very uncer- tainties are the reason why we are so careless, although they furnish no argument against better tillage. There is always more hope of success in thorough preparation. W. A, Aemsteonq. — In the second exjieri- ment, which brought Mr. VanDuzerthepoor yield of five bushels of wheat to the acre, lie may not have lost as much as the statement shows. No doubt that the field was fitted for future production, and the increase so ob- tained may yet furnish 'his full reward. I attempted a great crop of wheat a year or two smce, and to give perfect preparation, I expended two hundred and seventy-five dol- lars in well appUed labor and manure on three and a half acres. I got no harvest of wheat — not one sheaf — but I made an un- productive field fertile. Before, it was with- out value, because it returned nothing more than the cost of the labor applied, and labor will bring its price in any market. Wow the field is a safe dependence every .year. A great crop of wheat would have been very gratifying as proof of my advancement in knowledge and no doubt I should have pointed to it with an assumption of superiority, but the complete failure of my expected reward did not di- minish the value of the lesson learned. — • My neighbor, on a field near the scene of my failure, in the same year, harvested a fine crop of wheat, and the seed was put in with the most shiftless lack of preparation, as he himself declared. The explanation was that his field was uroist, low land, while mine was upland loam, and during the whole month of May not a shower of rain came. My wheat died from lack of nutrition, which was abun- dant within reach of the roots; but there was not moisture enough to release it. In a wet May his wheat would ha^-e perished from OiCess of moisture. Mr. S. M. Cark — There is very great waste in seeding to grass. My observation leads me to believe that in this county the grass crop is seriously restricted by scanty seeding. The waste is stinginess. There are farms in the back towns where an acre gets but four quarts of grass seed, and there ' are many farmers who regard six quarts to the acre as very liberal seeding. Now that is not more than half the amount I use, and I am sure that I do not irse too much. The true way is to fill the surface with grass roots at the beginning for it is an enormous waste to start here and there a stool and wait for them to spread over all the field. We waste fertility by keeping land too long under the plow before returning it to 35 grass, and wu wasto our grass and hay in feeding stock of poor grade. A miserably mean animal will eat as muoh. as one of bet- ter breed. A poor unproductive cow will consume as muoh as one that yields a full mess of milk. All that is fed to the former is thrown away and the profit from the latter must make up the loss. It is better to get rid of poor stock even if it must be killed to get it out of the way. There is improvement going on in the breeds of cattle in this county which is gratifying, but there is need of haste. I do not agree with Mr. Van Dnzer in the matter of enlarging our fields, although I know it is expensive to maintain fences. I prefer to have small fields, say four or five acres on small farms, thereby insuring fresh pastures. In large fields the con- tinued efforts of cattle to select the best, tramp the grass down, and their lying on it and dropping the excrements render all unpalatable at last. By smaller fields this matter is cor- rected in givina; to fields seasons of rest. Mr. ViN DuzEE — How small would you make fields on a farm of two hundred acres, with forty cows ? Mr. Cake — On such a farm, ten acres ; but my remarks were meant to apply to ordinary smaller farms. The discussion here took a. wide range, running over the preparations for Spring work and the general carelessness of farmers in the care of tools, and in their lack of fore- thought. The President — We do waste u, great deal, and we do not seem to know how to stop waste, nor where the eifort- shall begin. I have a forty-acre meadow which gives a crop of grass so fine that it needs a fine tooth comb to rate it. I think the land ought to be worth $150 an acre for farm purpose, but it does not pay five per cent, on fifty dollars. Now there is a waste in that field. Will some one tell me why ? and how I may prevent it ? I know I do suffer loss from the soaking of the manure pile, for the soakage escapes through the soil. How shall I prevent that ? With others here who speak of improvcil tillage, I believe in lessened areas of culture. Iiast season I had a field sown with wheat — one portion after oats and another after a hoed crop, the land highly manured last winter and the crop planted in the spring and thoroughly hoed during summer. On this portion nine-tenths of the wheat stands to-day, and it looks better than it did in the fall. The portion after oats is now without promise, and I confess should not have been sown with wheat. The argument is aU in favor of thorough preparation. If there is any profit in wheat, it must come from that direction. We all admit that in our ipan-' agement there is great waste. Now the eifort should be made to find out what are the sources of waste and then shut them off. Wo do not waste time in coming here to dis- cuss these matters if we profit by the losses, and we may go to Van Etten and to Breese- port to discuss the sam^ things there, with- out charging our time and work. / Mr. John Bsidgman — One great obstacle to success is the habit into which some farm- ers fall of beginning late. There is a time in the spring when the seed should be sown, and if it is deferred to a late period it is be- hind in growth, in yield and in profit. This is especially true with corn, and besides, the labor of attending it is greatly increased. I believe that corn planted in good season may be kept properly cultivated and clear from weeds at one-half the cost required when there is a little delay in the planting and working. Another bad habit into which some farm- ers fall is, the frequent change of employ- ment by' which the day is divided by several employments, every change producing waste of time. It is best to continue the working force upon the job first begun, if that be possible, until it is done. Mr. Van Duzek expressed his dislike to subjects of discussion which permit so wide a range. He would consider discussions more likely to result in a profitable increase of knowledge if we could narrow them more to individual experiences and observations. He did not regard the farmer's time wasted 36 when not engaged in manual labor, provided there was an exercise of brain faculties. — Those who have large operations may gener- ally do better by giving their time to thought, arranging and devising plans, giving system to the work, and keeping the force usefully employed, than by taking hold with the la- Dorers. He regarded as a good rule for such men, never to undertake a task which one of his laborers could perform as well. Mr. S. A. Chapman — Three years ago I had fifteen acres of wheat on my farm and that spring I put a tenant on with an agreement that he should cut the wheat whenever I said it was ready. When I thought it was about fit I drove out and cut a few sheaves, but it seemed a little green, so I told him to wait about three days. Then when he began he broke his cradle and lost a day, next day it ' rained, and the next he was sick, and as the result of my little delay, I lost as much as twenty bushels of wheat, and wheu I sold the crop the miller complained that I had let it get too ripe, and he was right. Mr. Fletcher Caeb — It was the motto of a famous man tliat "He who rejects time — time wiU reject," meaning of course, it is better to seize upon the moment. Mr. Carr argued in favor of larger fields by which the cost of fences is lessened, and there is less proportion of unsightly corners too often suffered to grow up to thistles and other promiscuous weeds, which adorn the farm about as a dirty shirt collar does the wearer. CULTIVATION OF EAKLET. Satdkdat Evening, Feb. 28, 1371. The first business of the evening was the exhibition of samples of spring wheat for seed, J. H. Fountain showing beautiful white seed raised in Minnesota. It is inden- tical with that shown by S. Everett a few weeks since, so Mr. Everett turns liis orders over to J. H. Fountain & Co., who have the seed in fall supply at their mill. Other samples raised in Winona, Minnesota, were shown by Samuel Hotchkin, who has also enough to meet the demand, and at low rates. His varieties are Eio Grande and Gold Drop, both red or amber and very lino for milling. All these are well worth trial and may fairly be expected to prove hardy and productive. Many inquiries for spring wheat have reached the club, and these ref- erences must be accepted as an answer to all. Mr. M. C. Baldwint, of Chemung, writes to enquire how he shall attempt to change the kind of timber on his wood lot, and what profits will attend the operation. He wants chestnut and walnut, where he now ha's pitch pine and scrub oak. Last fall he buried several bushels of the nut-i to be ready for the spring planting, and is now in doubt which is the better plan, to sprout in the garden or nursery and set after a few years growth, or to plant at first where he desires the trees to grow. There is no man in the county whose judgment is a safer guide in these matters, than Mi-. Baldwin himself. The opinion of the club, however, seemed to favor filanting in the place where the trees are desired to stand, if the land is in a suitable 'condition to receive and germinate the seed. There is not much more work than in nursery planting and all the labor of re- setting, which is much more than the origi- nal planting, is thus avoided. On the question o; profits Mr. Baldwin prdents an attractive table of estimates footing up a total of J12,800 in twenty years growth on forty acres, with such slight de- ductions for care that the whole sum might bo regarded as profits. He would expect to crop the land without detriment to the the trees, or, perhaps, with real advantage to them. On the profit silo Mr. S. Cars to whom the subject was referred to at a pre- vious meeting now presented an elaborate report, most of which, however, it was deem- ed better to reserve for a future occasion. He cites one case : "A man bought a poor farm in Delaware about twenty years ago, and planted pine seeds and chestnuts along the bank of a creek where the land was gullied. The cost was twenty dollars for the labor and seed. He now has hundreds of cords of wood foi' fuel aiil alj'.m lance of saw logs 37 for his own use as ttie growth oJ twenty years as profit on the trifling investment. Vice President McCann, who occupied the chair, called the regular subject for discus- sion at a late hour — CULTIVATION OF EAELST Mr. Charles Heller — If I might select the ground most likely to meet the require- ments of barley I should take com stubble, or ground which had been planted to pota- toes the previous year. I would cultivate it very thoroughly to get it in a fair tilth. If that could not be done by plowing once, I should plow twice. I would not be in a hur- ry to sow the seel in the early spring — bet- ter wait until the ground is dry and warm, so that growth can begin at once. Barley is a tender plant and suffers by frost almost as much as corn does. As to the seed, it should be barley, not oats and barley, nor barley and other stuff, nor even poor barley, but nice, even, plump seed all, and it should be very evenly distributed, either broadcast or drilled. The necessity for the even charac- ter of the seed and the even distribution ap- pears when the crop is offered for gale. If it is not uniform it is not only less in price but is reaUy less valuable for malting. Now this care taken in the selection of seed and even sowing all tends to insure even ripen- ing. Then comes the critical moment. It must be harvested at exactly the right time to have the greatest value, and that time i.i when the field has a white silvery color. It should be cut after the dew is off in the morning, and after it has had the sun until the middle of the afternoon] it should be rake 1 up and ab once drawn into the barn. If I ha 1 one acre of barley I would harvest it aooor ding t o this plan, be- ing careful to cut it at the precise time when it has the silvery hue, and to draw it in on the same day without a drop of dew upon it, and if I had ten acres I should try to get help enough to get it all in on one day. Barley wants good ground, and it should never fol- low oats, because there will come some of ■ the lattej seed with the barley, thus damag- ing the crop. It these conditions are all met, thero is as much profit as in any other grain crop, and the land is left in good con- dition for wheat — almcst as good as a sum- mer fallow. Mr. Geokoe Mabt — How wUl it do on a clover lea ? I have such a piece which I have thought of plowing for barley this spring. Mr. Hellbk — I never succeeded on any sod turned over for barley. It has a quick growth, and therefore needs a fine tilth, so that it can grow right forward from the be- ginning. I have harvested the crop in nine- ty days after sowing. On a clover field not long seeded, or in other words without much sod, perhaps it would do to venture. Mr. Samuel A. Chapman — Would it be safe to stow away a ten-acre crop cut in that silvery state and drawn in on the same day ? Mr. Hellek — If evenly ripened, without green heads, there would be no risk, and the grain would thresh out bright and without fault. Mr. John Bkidoman — Although of late I have not raised much barley, I used to make the crop a specialty. I preferred barley as less exhausting to the soil than oats. My mode was to turn under the rowen in the fall, getting all the growth after mowing in the proper season, for a fii'st crop of hay. This on clo- ver meadow makes a good coat of green manure to work in. On that I planted corn in the succeeding spring, and the next spring I plowed the corn stubble for barley. At that plowing the clover manuring showed plainly all throngh the furrow, and the field would be mellow like ashes. I never failed of a good crop when so managed, and as Mr. Heller has said, the land was always left by the barley in a good condition for wheat. A miller who dealt in barley, then tuld me that in a long experience he had found the best season to sell always before the close of October and advised me never to hold later, and I think he was right. I do not know about the propriety of drawing in barley on the same day it is cut. I am afraid it would not often be ripened bo evenly as to admit such stowing with safety. Of course it would 38 have to be rakod loo^e and would require a great deal of room if tlie crop was large. I have always bound it in sheaves and set up in shocks to dry. Speaking of binding I know men object because of the beards, but I would rather bind barley than oats or wheat because the straw ha3 less harshness than either. A heavy dew is as hurtful to barley as a rain for both color the grain in such a way as to lessen the price very materially. The Secretary offering his modicum of knowledge said : It wiU not always do to sow barley after corn, even when the corn crop has been very good, indicating the re- quisite fertility in the soil. I remember an experiment wherein I undertook to raise an extra crop and with that design gave most thorough fitting to one acre, which was then planted and duly attended, even to pulling by hand the few weeds that appeared after the corn was too big to allow tilling. The acre gave one hundred and fifty bushels of ears, and the stubble was as clear of weeds as a naked fallow. The next spring it was plowed and sown with barley in the expecta- tion of a great crop. The seed came up with a promising start, but soon there appeared innumerable weeds, and their vigor far sur- passed the barley, so that long before the harvest they overtopped the crop, and not waiting for ripeness I cut and raked up the stinking mass for fodder. The mistake was in not planting again with corn and by every means coaxing into growth every weed seed in order to insure destruction by thor- ough tillage, for the land which could give one such crop of corn was strong enough to give another and then raise a good crop of barley. The old sod had been used more than twenty years for pasture and occasion- ally mowed, and thus the surface held an accumulation of weed seeds which had been awaiting the proper condition for germination. When the sod was evenly tumel the first season all these seeds were safely preserved, and when brought to the surface by the subsequent plowing, then was t"ie opportune moment, and all sprang into vigorous life. Not only must the land bo rich and clean, it mvist be even in character, for Mr. Heller has well said, barley must reach that silvery state all at once to insure the best product. Hence there must be no wet spots nor dry knolls to distm-b equality of character in the different portions of the field. But in oae matter my experience does not tally with Mr. Heller's instruction. I have succeeded better when the seed has been sown early. I know the young plants will not endure heavy frosts, but I would venture a little chance of absolute safety. Mr. Seely p. Chapman — My objection to Mr. Heller's plan would be to the drawing in on the day of cutting. If bound and well set up with caps on the shocks, or if raked loose and left 1 o cure in cocks a day or so, I think there would be more safety. Mr. F. MoCoNNELL — There is very much to be said in regard to the proper cultivation of barley, as well as of the modes of produ- cing other grains. Barley is a delicate crop, and will not stand weeds, as we have just been told, but then, (with u. glance toward the Secretary) good farmers don't raise weeds. We are often told how to till our land for this crop and for that. I have in mind the recollection of one man who was ever ready to give advice as to what to raise, how and where to raise it, where to settle down to farming, untU with aU this weight of responsibility he became demented and not long ago died lamented. There is a little story which wiU serve to indicate the great need : Two neighbors, farmers, with lands sep- arated only by a division fence, raised — one fine large crops, with luxuriant growth and regular profit ; the other, poor, sickly stunted growth, and no profit — said he to the other, oneday,looking over from his sorry field to his neighbor's, "How is that you succed while I do not ? What manure do you use on your land ?" "Brain;;," said the other. Well, now, brains are the very substance; they make the very best manure ; they are good for barley, and for- all our crops. With proper preparation ant care, barley is a very productive and profitable grain, and if my friend Maby wants 39 to turn his clover field for barley lie can do it with, safety if there is not much timothy in the sod, provided he will he care- ful to get the right kind of seed. In fact clover makes a good fitting for harley. It is true that weed seeds will remain for years in the ground and yet be ready to grow when the opportunity comes. Any one may find the proof in his clover field if he will observe where a balk is made in sowing — there the weed seeds spring into life. But now in this matter of barley seed. I bought what was regarded as very superior barley, paying fourteen shillings a, bushel, and then I washed this fine seed until one- half had floated off, and the remainder had then cost twenty-eight shillings a bushel, I used for seed with this result — sixty bushels to the acre as the yield,headsallon the upper surface even, plump and bright. How did I do it ? Why, by washing. It is one of the best preparations. There will be kernels too light, some with the hull knocked, some broken and this process separates all these and leaves for use only good seed. Now roll it in plaster after the water is well drained off, and the plaster will take up the moisture, aid in sowing and is in itseK a fertilizer. I can by this process raise the straw so high, (elevating his arm to a horizontal poiition) and the only true way to take up is to bind in sheaves, then set them two and two, with the heads firmly pressed together, in which position they will not hurt even if there be some rain before drawing. I wiU. risk all the dews. Observe all these directions and you will harvest bright, heavy barley. Mb. S. a. Chapman. — Do you say rain will not stain it ? Me. MoConnell. — Yes sir. I say that barley properly bound and set up wOl take a considerable rain without appreciable injury, and if I could' nt raise it tall enough to bind I would quit the business. You effect that by taking out in the washing process the poor seeds, which, although they might grow, would not have vitality to push up where you want the crop. Me. J. F. Beechee. — Do you raise that tall barley in this county ? Mr. McCoNNELL. — Yes sir. And to prove to you that these things can be done I will take a clover lea and raise a piece the com- ing season. Mr. Chapman. — Would you drill the seed? Mr. MoConnell — That is a mere matter of taste. If the seed is evenly distributed by hand it is just as well. Mr. Hellee — I will gather mine and put it in the barn the same day without bind- ing, and it will come out brighter than his will. Mr. MoConnell — If it rains, what will you do P Mr. Hellek — If it rains mine will be"hurt and his not less hurt. Mr. W. W. Jenkins enquired if barley would not color before cutting, and was an- swered by Mr. Heller. Yes, in wet weather, and if cut with heads lying on the ground, wUl grow in twenty-four hours. Mr. Van Gokdee questioned Mr. MoCon- nell about the tall growth, and receiving as- surances that it could be produced, solicited some bundles to be used next fall in binding up his corn. Vice-President McCann — Grood clover lea may be safely used for barley without doubt. I think it would be quite as good as corn stubble or potato fields. Some years ago I remember cutting Mr. Heller's barley with a reaper, and he took it in, as he has told us, on the same day. I thought it would be in- jured, but I saw it threshed in the following winter and it was bright. Mr. J. H. Fountain — Two or three years ago I undertook farming on high priced land whihh I bought near Seneca Lake. I thought I could do something with barley and according had a piece fitted. My neigh- bors advised me to sow early. The soil was a black loam with some clay, and in the spring wet, but I had barley sowed early, in the wet as advised. Before I got through a, 40 neighbor advised me to trade horses with him because as he said it would be better for me, and being advised I acted^ by which means I had one liorse that worked and one that wouldn't. Well tlie seed came up spar- ingly — quite sparingly — and then there came drouth which didn't help it much. Soon there came beautiful pink blossoms scattered all over the field which my neighbors said were this- tles — Canada thistles, and they advised me to get a supply of gloves to bind in. "Well, be- ing advised, I sent for the gloves, but we didn't need them, because there wasn't straw enough to bind. When we got it raked up and ready to draw I found that it was very bad to load. While we built up on one side of the rigging the barley would slide off on tlie other. However, we got it to the barn where I intended to stack it. They advised me to stack it. Well, such work was very perplexing. One side of tlie stack would slip off, and when we axranged that the other side would slip, when it was done it was a very singular locking stack. My neighbors ad- vised me to thresh it which I fe^t quite inolined to do, because it stood in plain view of the road. Being advised, I did thrash and put the crop on the market. I believe I sold for about fifty cents a, bushel, and my crop showed a gain of one hundred per cent. — that is, I got two bu hels to sell for every one I sowed. Mb. McConnell. — He raised bailey under advice, and was served right. Mk. Fairbanks narrated experience thus. — I plowed an old pasture and planted to corn and p3tatoa3, which I cultivated and hoed well, making all tolerably clean of weeds, but as in other fields there were some of the little weeds left to perfect their seeds. The next spring I plowed the whole and sowed barley, aud it grew as high as my shoulder ; it was all cut by a cradle and bound :'n sheaves. There was no trouble with weeds. I think perhaps if barley can be cut when Just right it may safely be put in on the same day. Now there is much difference of opinion expressed in these discussions, as I observe by reading the reports. Why? Because men do not consider the different circum- stances. A witness, being asked which way a flight of stairs led, answered, " That de- pends on where you stand — if at the foot, it leads upward; if at the top, it leads down- ward. Now there are such differences ' to consider in farm operations. There are dif- ferences of soils and of situations. Not all soils will raise barley. Mr. Beechek. and others endeavored to draw forth statements of yield, but without effect, big stories passing at a, heavy dis- count. Mr. EvEKETT, of Minnesota, would venture one. "In my section one man planted twen- ty-seven hundred acres of white beans," and being properly vouched, the story was al- lowed to pass, although several members pronounced it windy. Mr.EvEKET^ explained — "He was the agent of a colony, who came a yea ' in advance, and used this crop to fit the land for future ope- rations." OVEKSTOCKIUa. Satuedat Evening, March 7, 1874. The membership of the Club is steadily increasing, and the interest is in no degree diminished. Although the roads have been in a horrible condition for several of the last meetings, and the difficulty of reaching the hall farther aggravated by drizzling rains, there has not been a meeting since the year began which was not well attended, and in which the discussion was not animated. A noticeable feature in the accession of names is the unusual proportion of young men who join. They attend, too, with regularity, patronize the library, and sometimes take part in the debates. In the regular order of basiness the Pres- ident calls on the members to state their wants. Stock, grain or other property to sell — what is wanted on the farm, and sug- gestions of a general nature touching the interests of the institution. This call at the last meeting brought ten horses, in teams and single, from fair to extra good, all seek- 41 ing purchasers. So there were calls for seed, for swine, and other needs. Sometimes it happens that very considerable transac- tions are made in exchanges of this charac- ter within the five minutes given. Everything being ready. President Hoff- man opened the selected subject OVBKSTOCKING. This subject is susceptible of various meanings, but the sense in which we are to consider it, is the excess of stock on our farms — beyond the profitable limit— too many in number and requirements for the feed. It needs no argument to prove that such overstocking is always wrong. Whoever does so stock his fields with whatever kind of stock commits a great evil. But what one farmer would call an excess of stock another would not. We shall not consider this mat- ter all with the same ideas of what consti- tutes the evU. Should pasture be fed down close ? I have some friends in Orange county, very successful grazers, who say old pastures should be fed down for the good of the sod, and they certainly do establish the grass firmly on their lands, but we are to note the fact that their soil is better adapted to permanent grass than ours. Now while these men keep a great many cows and feed their pasture close, they would be overstock- ed if they fed nothing more, but they feed in the stable grain every day to their cows, and they also offer hay or grass fodder of some kind. Of course we can carry a great stock on a little land if we supplement the short pasture with a proper allowance of grain, and the man who does that is not over- stocked. I have been speaking more of keeping cows than other stock. When they are required to keep pastures so close that a weed cannot spring up, and no extra feed is given them, they will not yield much profit, and under such treatment the grass in the pastures will at last die out, I think. Now if I were pasturing fattening steers, I should not want such close eating as the cows have. To judge from our friend Car- penter, who is eminently successful in feed- ing steers, I should say one-half the grass on the pasture land must be allowed to grow up and mature. Putting on so many hoofs as to prevent any of the grass from reaching fuU development he would regard as over- stocking with steers. I believe he is right, and the proof is in his great success. But his is a specialty — ^beef. Now we must not apply the same rules to other stock. We of- ten pass fields where we see large herds of cattle, and the grass grazed close to the ground and we may say hastily, that land is overstocked. Now it will not do to decide just on the appearance of the pasture ; we must first see the grain bins and ask what is fed out of them. I believe it is an advan- tage the farmer has when he keeps more stock than his pastures can carry and makes up the deficiency with grain. There are so many circumstances to consider that our rules can only be general, leaving every farmer free to modify them according to his knowledge of his own situation. And this leads me to ask : Are we overstocked in knowledge ? I believe we do not reach that condition. We do get too much knowl- edge — in our own estimation. ^But we de- ceive nobody but ourselves when we grow so wise in our own conceit. But, seriously, I believe some do get overstocked in book knowledge. Their stvidy has" filled them with much that is not useful. It certainly is possible to pursue knowledge with so much zeal as to forget the affairs of our lives de- manding every-day attention. In one particular branch of farm stock it is very easy and very common to overstock. I allude to horses, and the fact that five or six teams are offered here for sale proves that these farmers are ready to unload. Now if I were to make one general rule for aU farmers to regulate the number of all the animals to be kept, I should say keep no more than can be maintained in such aver- age condition aU the year round that one half of the number could at any time be fit to drive to the butcher. If cattle are not kept up to that standard they are not doing as well as they ought to do. Of course I do not mean that they should be finished beef, but rather in that high condition of thrift which would pass the inspection of the butcher almost as well. Whoever has more 42 animals than he can keep according' to this rule should sell off down to that point where he can improve keeping, until his stock at- tains the degree of thrift indicated. Now this rule as I have sk,id must be regarded as a, general one, but all will understand that milch cows cannot be kept fat, there are seasons when they will be poor, especially such as are of superior value as milkers. With such good feed means good products if there be not fat. Now in answer to the question how close shall we feed pasture land, I can only answer generally. With such stock as I keep — cows, I prefer to feed rather close and add feeds of grain whenever there is need. In the Spring I would turn on some fields so early that the cows should get the first green blade. There are fields when the herbage is of a, rank, coarse character — lauds a little swampy, or swales — such pasture fed early and close is much sweeter than when further matured. Of course, I would keep such closely fed, in order to make all that grows, fresh. Mr. Pitch — I give hearty assent to all that the President has said. In my experi- ence I have fallen more than once into the error of overstocking, and I have always lost by it. As I now feel I judge thirty cows enough to put on a farm of two hundred acres of good land. Some would say forty, and others, fifty ; but I would be satisfied with the thirty, and better feed, — Of course, I would not expect to feed up everything produced by the farm. My opin- ion is that cows want more grass than fat- tening cattle need. I find that I always over-estimate the carrying capacity of my pastures in the Spring. I buy what steers I want and put on, thinking they cannot con- sume half the feed, but even with that esti- mate I sometimes find the pasture overstocked along in August or September. I remember one season, when in June I turned in thirty steers and the grass was certainly big enough then to cut a ton to the acre. I couldn't get all the stock I wanted at fail' prices so I told a neighbor he might put on some of his steers, which I thought better than to let the grass waste. The result was when I went to inspect my cattle two or three weeks after, they were not as good as when I had that extra lot turnedin,so I told my neighbor to take his steers out at once. He did and mine went on improving. Now there was plenty of grass for all, in bulk, but I sup- pose it became unpalatable from the tramp- ing of so many feet and the increase of the droppings. My opinions have undergone another change in regard to the season of turning out. I would turn out as soon as the snow goes off and the first young grass appears, especially on clover pasture, which is thus kept young and fresh, and I would keep less cattle than I wotild want, in order to secure good fresh feed in the fall. Such feed saves very much of the cost of animal keeping. In open winter weather young cattle on such fields get much picking that is good for them, and the past winter, the first in years, I have been induced to let my cows run out by the apprehension that I should lack fod- der. The result is I shall have several tons of hay to sell. liiquisitive members siibjeoted Mr. Fitch to a rigid questioning in regard to the limit fixed, thirty cows to two hundred acres of land, and thereby drew out plans which ap- peared to include the raising of grain for the double purpose of securing ample supply of nutl'itious food for the cows at all sea- sons of the year, and to afford a surplus for sale. He had fixed the limit low in numbers to insure absolute plenty of feed, thereby obtaining the best guaranty of profit. Mr. S. P. Chapman — Thirty cows to two hundred acres ef land looks to me like very light stocking, it certainly is light if one ex- pects to get the profit from the cattle alone I boiight twenty-six acres of land from Mr. Fitch, so I can speak from the same balay for her entries, but soft words and discreet attention pacified and, apparently, satis- fied all. Now let us meet and -arrange everything as well as we can a day or two before the opening, and there laeed be no cause for complaint. Meantime we should keep it before the people that fair treat- ment is what we desire to give and what we will exert ourselves to offer to all. Mr. S. M, Cabk — After an extended experience in the department- man- agement of fairs, I am prepared to say, that the greatest difficulty arises i'rom the confused manner of making entries, and this in turn is caused by tlie rush and pressure of business at the last- Many entries are made in wrong classes because there is not a correct under- standing on the part of the exhibitor of the requirements, and the pressure on^ the secretary will not permit explanation. Earlier entries would obviate all tliis, but if mistakes occur there should be th e ready means of correction. There was last year a line carriage team entered in the class given to farm horses. 85 Mr. Taylor, the exhibitor, was without doubt, plain In his direction, and besides a, mere glance was sufficient to show that his were carriage horses and nothing else. I tried earnestly to have correction made, but without avail, and Mr. Taylor was cheated out of a prize, for plainly enough he had the best carriage team on the ground, by carelessness not his, entered in the farm class. There were many sim - ilar oases. , In making up the committees great care should be taken to fill the places with some who have nothing to exhibit in the classes which they judge.' I think the managers sometimes fail to meet the requirements in this respect. As to the trot I fully believe that it may be managed without the evil practices which usually attend such exhibitions, and if it can I do most heartily approve of it. Let wrong doing find its penalty; let the officers be vigilant and we shall have no trouble growing out of the trot; all gamb- ling or betting must, of course be prohib- ited, and the whole management subject to the rules of the society. Mr. Owen. — Very many of the entries are made by letter, and insufficient data are given to enable the Secretary to place animals in their proper classes. No doubt that officer does the best he can and finds embarrassment enough without being obliged to assume the blame which should fall on exhibitors themselves. Mr. Cabk. — But if there are mistakes should they be rectified .'' President MoOann. — Every means should be used to prevent mistakes, and if they do occur the best possible thing must be done. They cannot always be set right. The society distributes five thousand pamphlets with the printed rules set forth. Certainly exhibitors should nse their own intelligence. The Secretary is not required to examine every team entered to decide in what class it shall be put. Mr. Van Duzbb. — There is a great deal of hard work attending the conduct and management of a fair, and, as a rule, it is poorly paid. I insist that the men who devote their time and energies to the building up of the fair should be liberal- ly paid. Let us pay a good salary to the secretary so that he may afford to devote time to the work, and with our excellent faoihtes and central position there is no reason why we may not have shows as great as those of the State society itself- It was the design of those who encourag- ed this location of the State society that we should build u() a great institution which .should be an honor to the whole country about us. Let us hasteu to ac- complish the design. Mr. G. S. McOann. — If we do not have a successful fair the whole blame should be charged upon the Club, for there are enough of us to make a good show, if we have the proper spirit. I say then the re- sponsibility rests with us. Let every man , every woman and every child take something of excellence, as all may, and there will be no failure. But let no one look over the articles and say, " I could beat this." He should be ashamed to say it, for it is proof that he has neglected a duty. As to committee work I know it is dif- ficult. I have been obliged to award pre- miums on the statements of exhibitors who showed samples of grain and gave statements of the yield. I could not dis- pute them nor believe them. They should be required to verify by oath that more truthful men may get their just dues. Mr. HoTOHKiN. — I have had presented to me frequently the j_idea of an inter- 86 county fair on the grounds placed at our disposal. Gentlemen in the aurrownding counties hvive frequently expressed their desire for such an organization. May it not be well to consider it? Our fairs are im- proving, and we ought not to favor com- petition. We do much better than a fair of which I read not long ago — I think in a Utica paper — where the articles exhio- ited were a calf, a goose, and a pumpkin. After further remarks by several of the speakers and long after the proper hour of closing, it was resolved to continue the subject at the next meeting, which hap- pens to be the evening of the last day for taking entries of horses, cattle, sheep and swine, grain and dairy products. Presi- dent MoOann promised the attendance of a clerk for taking entries, of whose service any belated exhibitors may avail, at the Olub IrlaU at the next meeting. Saturday Eve., Sept, 19, 1874. Several of the old members appeared bearing signs of fatigue, for they had spent more or leas of the week in attend- ance at the State fair in Koohester. Pres- ident Hoffman having filled his place of executive officer in charge of a depart- meut, had given a whole week of exhaust- ive labor to the performance of duty, but at the usual hour of opening he was in his place and called the Club to the order of business. Late last fall Mr. Davis, a farmer in Keading, Schuyler county, presented to the Olub specimens of his seedling potatoe which had acquired some local celebrity, his object being to secure an impartial test of its qualities. The potatoes were at that time assigned singly to several gentlemen who engaged to plant and re- turn statements of observed facts when the products should be gathered. Mr. Davis attended this meeting in expectation of hearing full reports of the several tests, but only Mr. George S. McOann was pre- pared with a statement; the others, gen- erally, not having gathered their crops. He had planted his single potato, out to small pieces, with the design of securing the greatest yield, and to make a compar- ative test he had planted in close proxi- mity an equal number of hills of the early rose, ^vith the difference only that of the latter he used the full average amount of seed. On digging he' found the product of the Davis potato forty-five and three- quarter pounds, and that of the early rose, forty -eight pounds. This test he regard- ed as in favor of the former, taking into account the diminished seed, but as to appearance the rose was superior because the specimens were fair and smooth, while the Davis product came out rough with prongs, which might be owing to too great richness of the soil. Of the quality for the table no te.9t was reported. At a future meeting, when the other ex- perimenters shall have gathered their crops and the facts of growth, full re- ports will be submitted to the Club and reported in the proceedings. President Hofbman, in opening the subject for discussion, " The Management of Fairs," said that his duties in the ser- vice^of the State Society had so engrossed his time and attention during all the week, that he had only a few hours before been able to read the report of the last discus- sion, when the county fairs had received a very full criticism, at which meeting he had not appeared to explaiu some of the causes of complaint. He was quite will- ing that all faults should be pointed out, and he hoped that means of correction would be found. As he read the report of the former meeting the remissness of officers had been pointed out, and for whatever fell within his department he was ready to answer. Mr. Samuel Cabk — I think the report- er misapprehended some parts of my re- marks at the last meeting. It is true that 87 I spoke of entries whicli, by being assign- ed to wrong classes, made vexatious trouble, but I charged no fault on the general superintendent Hoffma,n, who certainly labored assiduously to bring or- der out of the chaos of errors. I say now if we would have successful and well or- dered fairs there must be salaries paid to the officers in charge, so that they can not only aflford to devote their personal services to the work, but may employ suit- able assistants. W. A.. ARMSTKONa. — The speakers at the last meeting pointed out faults whi(;h were charged to the account of soine of- ficers. Let us not at this meeting fear to face the responsibilities. I see tlie presi- dent, secretary, general superintendent, and many of the departraent superintend- ents, are hero, interested in all that re- lates to the manageioent of I'jiirs. I; we said things with some freedom of speech a week ago let us see uow huw much we can sustain. Allot' iis w.-tat to make the approaching fiiir suceosifiil in the mau- agement, in the display ot' products, 'and in its influence upou a.u-ic.nltiir-^. Mr. Cakb. — I spoke of errors in entries by which carriage horses were put into my class of farm horses, and when 1 tried to get correction mule, in the iaterest of the exhibitor,' I could not; so we had charges of wrong, which were true, and we made enemies where we might have made friends. I say the secretary should know the proper olas-i ia which aaimals, horses especially, should appear. The idea that I wished to enforce at the last meeting was, that it is the duty of the secretary to inform exhibitors just where their entries should appear, aud to enable him to do all this we should pay a liberal salary and provide for capable assistants. Men come with their horses to exhibit and they have no definate idea of the ar- rangement which divides them into class- es. There must be some officers to give them the information or these mistakes will certainly occur. Of course this comes within the province of the secre- tary's duties, but if mistakes do happen, after all possible care to put things X'ight, why there should even then be means of correction. There should be some com- petent body, having jurisdiction which may right errors and restore favor to those who vex themselves by many en- tries. Mr. Donald, of Veteran, made facetious remarliis about tlie carriage team ' which so deeply excited Mr. Carr's compassion by being forced into t£ie farm class. He said there was no mistake made as alleged. One of the liorses in question he raised and wi irked until h's found he was not good enough for a farm horse, and than sold him to a purohusef who procured the same day a mate, and called the pair a earriige team, but thay had no - dent. Pbesident Hoffman — I cannot regard myself as an instructor, bii t I am glad to say that the arrangements for the ap- proaching Fair are more carefully consid- ered,! believe, than ever before in the his- tory of our Society, and as far as I know, great effort is made to carry out the plans. The premium list has been arranged with great care, the light of past experience aiding in the work. It was thought that some of the annoying errors of which members have freely spoken, were due to the haste in making entries at the last moment and while the fair was in pro- gress, and there has therefore been a rule adopted by which entries are to be clos- ed a few days in advance, of the opening, thus giving time for the arrangements. The rule being new many seem to have failed to observe it. Perhaps it has not been pressed sufficiently on their notice, and the result now is that there are many desiring to enter worthy articles for ex- hibition and to-night the time expires,- thus shutting them out unless the rule be relaxed. This closing of entries in cer- tain classes some days in advance of the fair is a new feature with us. The State society closes its entries thirty days be- forehand, giving time for full prepara- tions, and the plaa seems to work well. But to meet the wants who have failed to understand the requirements which is now with us, I recommend that in the present instance the time for entries be extended to Wednesday, the opening day, at two o'clock in the afternoon. A.S to the entries that happen to be made in wrong classes there should be somebody to put them right. Perhaps this would fall within the duties of the department superintendents. As gener- al superintendent, I should not undertake to change entries. If a case should hap- pen where the entry is clearly wrong, I should appeal to the secretary's books, aud if thfrc should appear an error aris- ing from the misapprehi'nsii in or ignor- ance of the exhibitor, I think through the superintendents and the secretary it could be corrected. When the goods are properly assigned to their several depart- ments and the judges put in charge, it is the duty of the superintendents to see that every thing is brought to their notice, that nothing escapes inspection. The Judges, I believe, are, or may be, cloth- ed with sufficient power to protect them- selves against undue influences by im- portunate exhibitors. It is their right to ask any questions relating to the charac- teristics of the entries that come under their observation, and they are entitled to such information, but they need not accept extravagant statements by inter- ested parties. I hope judges at our fair will take such statements, especially of the produce of fields or dairies, only for what they are worth. I have just heard a case of this kindt where loose state- ments are put forth as facts. I was de- puted to judge farms entered for prem- iums wit)i the State society and with oth- ers visited the place in question. Certain printed questions are submitted by the Secretary requiring answers by the appli- cant, which are to be filled in the blanks. Learning that the farmer had received the form, I asked, Have you answered the questions? "No, not yet." Will you ? "Yes, yes, I guess I can aU right. " " Do you keep books of account for your fields?" "No, but then I know about how things are. " The fact was he guess- ed his potatoes were planted at such a time, He guessed the product was so much. He guessed he had sowed so 90 much seed;fin a grain field. He guessed there -was so many acres in it. Now when we make these guesses the basis of an award^we are very likely to do injustice to some more accurate and more honest competitor. In regard to gambling at fairs I am glad to say it has not been countenanced by our society, and I hope it will never be. I know it is a feature of some of our neigh- boring fairs, ranging from the grossest kind to that which attends horse racing. I regret that it has been judged best to admit trotting for horses at our approach- ing fair. I want these shows kept pure- ly agricultural, and^would be willing to accept the condition that if they cannot be sustained on that basis they should go down. But having admitted the race, for such it is, let us do the best we can with it and restrain the evil tendencies as far as possible. I do not believe we can make it reputable, but°let us do what we can [in thaf'direction. I hope the time will come when'the State appropriations to county agricultural societies shall be withheld'from all which permit the mix- ing of races with the agricultural shows, and'the sum so withheld'shall be appor- tioned to those societies which exclude these immoralities. As to the gaming tables and the scenes that surround them, I can assure our friend who sees so much to condemn in his own county fairs, he can visit our fair without having his sight oflfended in this respect, for so long as I am superintendent no such practices wiU obtain] admission to the grounds. [Applause.] Jesse Owen. — It happens often that the judges who are expected to serve do not appear. Should not authority be given to the superintendent to fill the vacancies after consulting with the ex- ecutive officers ? President .Hoffman. — That is really the duty of the executive board, and for this and other work it should be conven- ed every day of the fair, but custom has put the work on the superintendents. Secretary Cuetis. — Although deeply in- terested in the fair, I did not come here to make any remarks. I expectgd my part to be criticised, and desire to profit by criticism. As to the case of the dis- satisfied exhibitor of last year I have no knowledge, but if gentlemen will call to mind the rush and pressure at my office when so many of these entries were made after the fair had opened, they will only wonder if there were not many wrong entries. I think I may congratulate my- self on the fact that no others are report- ed here. But even this may not have been my fault Men come to make en- tries of their horses, and after looking over the classes point to that in which they desire to be placed, and the entry is so made, although it may not suit them after they iind other entries to compete with theirs by which they feel assured their chances for premiums are damaged. Sometimes in such cases they desire to go into more promising classes. I can not see that it is my duty to assign them places. They should be better able to judge of the merits of their stock than I am. Of course, if there is an error dis- covered it should he corrected, no matter who is the author, but when this is done there will always be dissatisfied exhibi- tors. The case to which allusion has been made was the main reason for changing the practice by closing the en- tries some days in advance of the open- ing, hoping thus to avoid the confusion incident to the hurry and bustle of the first day. The books have now been constantly open at my office for two weeks, and for the last four days at the Hathaway House in this city. For the first two of these days but little was done, for exhibitors would come in and ask a few questions and then say, ' ' Well, you win be here a day or two yet, I will come again. " There is always this dis- 91 position to put off until the last. Still there is the advantage in the early clos- ing of entries that it permits the Secreta- ry to transcribe the entries in a proper manner, by which he may detect and rec- tify mistakes. The Society acts in good faith to all exhibitors, and the oificers are always anxious to give fair treatment. The question of judges is one which has always given much trouble. There are delinquents, making hasty appoint- ments necessary, and when the very best that can be done, is done, there are charg- es of favor. For this reason especial care has been taken this year to appoint judg- es in some of the more important classes of horses, resident out of the county. These gentlemen so appointed have been notified by letter and some of them have given their promise to attend while others will not be able. It would relieve me very much if the executive board would meet daily and fill all vacancies. So far the entries are very satisfactory, especially in horses and cattle, and there seems to be a lively in- terst in the first. It is trae I meet once in a while a man who carries the reccoUection of a real or fancied wrong he received fifteen or twenty years ago from the society, and he informs me that he " will not exhibit un til that thing is settled," and then other men are occasionally met who say," Get me a place within the ring and I will go in. " The utter abturdity of these suspic- ions is only laughable. Mr. DoNAiD, of Veteran, asked numer- ous questions in regard to the exhibition of old productions, such as beans, buck- wheat, clover seed, etc., which seemed to demand answers, but this being a meet- ing of the Farmers' Club, nothing athori- ative could be said. The club therefore adjourned, when President McCann call- ed an executive meeting of the officers of the Chemung County Society in which these questions were discussed and it was decided that the products spoken of by Mr. Donald might be exhibited whether old or new, and it was also resolved that the time for taking entries in all the class- es be extended to two o'clock p. m., on Wednesday, the opeing day. SATtTEDAT BVB., OOT. 3, 1874. At the close of the last week the Club tendered its hall to the executive com- mittee of the County Agricultural Socie- ty, the fair having just closed and the re- ports of committees with their awards of premiums then pressing for consideration- The offer having been accepted, the Club held no meeting for discussion. So at the present meeting no speaker had been selected nor any subject assigned. Two weeks ago a partial report was made of the product of a few seedling po- tatoes given to the Club by Mr. Davis, of Beading, Schuyler county, five or six in number, each of whom was expected to give good cultivation and care, to develop the true characterictics of the seed. Mr. Gt. S. McCann made a detailed report of his potato and the product at the last meeting. His opinion of the yield was favorable, but he objected to the rough- ness of the new potatoes, there were too many nubby protuberances. At this meeting several of the experimenters were prepared, not only with their reports, but with baskets of potatoes to exhibit. The first to make his statement was Mr. Hel- ler, who said: "I planted my potato on the 27th of April, having cut it to single eyes, each of which was the seed allotted to a hiU. The situation was a calf yard, and I think the ground was too rich to produce good potatoes. The spot selected for this seed was where the trough had set for feeding the calves, and of course was very rich, which accounts for the knotty 92 appearance of the product. The yield from one potato was a half bushel, which may be counted as good. But there is something about the yield which makes it look like the product of impure seed. Here are potatoes streaked, spotted and of the original seed, looking like so many varieties. Perhaps on poorer ground, or rather on ground better suited to the growth of fair potatoes, these would have been smoother and of more even appear- ance, but with my present observation, I prefer the early rose, specimens of which I have to show in comparison. From the Davis potato I had one hun- dred and five potatoes of a suitable size for the table, and fifteen or twenty small ones, which, so far as yield and size go, were well enough, but the prongs are a serious objection if they are a character- istic of growth." Mr. David Oonklin — I received one of these Davis potatoes for trial. I cut it in pieces and planted on the 15th of May, and dug the product on the 25th of Sep- tember. The seed weighed nearly one- half a pound, and the crop was seventy- six pounds of very knotty and rough po- tatoes, and many of them small. There were but few merchantable potatoes in the lot, perhaps not more than one-third. The potato planted was a red one, but those raised from it differ very much in appearance. Some resemble the peach- blow, others the pinkeye, others the early rose, and one is a long white potato like the Prince Albert, yet generally they were red, and as knotty a lot as you would care to see. W. S. Oare. — As compared with the early rose, my preference would be for the latter. I had one of the Davis pota- toes assigned me, and the product was knotty and irregular in character, although the yield was good — about a half bushel from one small potato. It is two weeks later than the early rose, and I can not see in what respect it is better. I have not tested its cooking qualities. Now I would like to ask if this prongy character is not produced by raising the crop on too rich land ? The seed left us by Mr. Davia was smooth, but here comes all these samples covered with rough prongs. President Hoffmak. — No doubt the land was too rich, and that accounts some- what for the roughness. I have seen the early rose grow like the samples here shown, when the explanation was the richness of the soil. As to the various colors and appearances presented by these potatoes, I should say that the seedling had not been grown long enough to have its characteristics fixed. It is not thoroughly and perfectly established. It is the experience of those who raise seed- ling potatoes that not one variety in a hundred of those produced is worth propagating, and besides many that do well in the first three or four years then prove worthless. No doubt this seedling presented by Mr. Davis was good in his hands, but with us it has not proved de- sirable, and has nothing to commend it over the early rose and other varieties. — Enough having been said of these pota- toes, let us now, consider other matters. No subject having been selected for dis- cussion at this meeting, let all feel free to speak of any matters of interest. Since we last met our county society held its annual fair, at which I trust many of you have learned important lessons. For self I think I have learned several as su- perintendent. I have learned something of Agricultural horse trots. In the last race, which, however, I did not see, there were four horses entered, and to prove the honesty of the test, general rumor has it that only three of the horses were sold out. Of course there must have been one honest trotter ! But I learned more important matter touching our agricultural productions. I saw wheat taken from a field where one 93 acre produced fifty -At© bushels, fine, nice Diehl wheat. That -was quite worth see- ing. Long ago I expressed the opinion that land used for raising tobacco was thereby put in the best condition for rais- ing wheat, and now that opinion is con- firmed by the story of this crop which was raised on tobacco land. I doubt if even a summer fallow is as good fitting as the preparation given by raising good crops of tobacco. There is the necessary fertility and freedom from weeds. And then we had corn on exhibition which was gathered from a crop on Mr. Q. S. McCann's farm that gave two hundred and ten bushels of ears to the acre, or at least from the one acre which was re- ported. We are pleased by such an exhibition, but there was even a larger yield — two hundred and forty bushels of ears from one acre, produced on the farm of Mr. Owen. Here are lessons to con- sider. I would ask, if such a crop may be raised in this valley on one acre, is it not a fair inference that it can be repeat- ed on another acre ? The same fertiliz- ing and the same care would produce two acres or ten acres of such corn to be re- ported at future fairs. It may be an ex- pensive job, no doubt it is, but it shows that the capabilities are here. Mr. Mc- Cann reported a very liberal application of manure, fifty-two big loads on his acre. Very well. He is rewarded by a great yield of corn this season, and he has not yet exhausted the virtues of the manure. He will be able to note its effects on the next crop and the next, and I do not know how much further. He has made something like permanent improvement. If we can produce such crops, and not know how to keep up fertility, we should go to school and learn how. Mr. Billings — I would like to have the production of Mr. Owen's acre kept by itself and shelled when the proper time comes, to see how it would hold out. Mr. Owen — It was not kept separate, and is now fed out. Mr. Billings — Was it measured or weighed, and if weighed, how many pounds were allowed to the bushel ? Mr. Owen — It was both measured and weighed, but having had nothing to do with the raising or handling, I can not say how many pounds were called a bush- el, although I do not doubt the usual es- timate was accepted. Mr. HoTCHKiN. — At the west seventy- two pounds of ears are called a bushel from the time of husking until the first of January, when it is supposed to be dry, and about seventy pounds are the allowance thereafter. G. S. McCann. — My acre did not pay for its cost by a great deal. Fifty-two loads of fine manure were used oi; the land, and every load was well worth two dollars. Of course 210 bushels of ears will not pay that cost ; but besides that there was the labor, which was great, for everything was done that was needed, so far as we know how, to encourage growth. We really had two hundred and twelve bushels of efirs, for one pile of two bush- els was found husked and overlooked when the measure was made. Mr. HoTCHKiN. — Three or four years ago I bought about a thousand bushels of as nice gourd seed Western corn as I ever had, and it was raised on the Genes- see flats. Now, I ask, is it certain that such corn can not be raised on our flats ? G-en. DiVBN. — What advantage would it give if we could raise it ? Mr. HoTCHKiN. — It is generally under- stood that it is better than our varieties for feed, because there is more nutriment in it. It is thought to be better for all purposes. It will even make more whis- ky. 94 President Hoffman. — While I cannot inform Mr. Hotchkin about the possibility of producing the gourd seed variety here, I can state my observation of some experiments made with Ohio corn thir- ty years ago we planted it in the hope of improving the yield, and from the crop raised we planted again, when it was plainly seen it began to put on the characteristics of our corn, thus adapting itself to the situation. The stalks were re- duced in height, and the growth less lux- uriant, It was later in ripening, iiud on the whole the experiment was not deemed worth pursuing, so it was aban- doned. Mr. Owen. — The President spoke some time ago about the fitting for tobacco be- ing excellent for wheat and yet tobacco is generally considered an exhausting crop. My experience has been that it leaves the land in excellent condition for any grain which may follow, including wheat and rye. The soil is loose and free from weeds, and if good crops of tobacco have been raised there is abundant fertility for producing full grain crops. When the great yield of corn was pro- duced, which our farmers reported at the fair, no manure was used. Eight or nine years ago the field was in poor grass, not having sodded well, and was plowed well and planted with corn, giving the largest yield we had ever obtained then. After that a grain crop was raised, and on that clover and timothy were sown and a good sod made. Ever since it has been mown or pastured until this crop, when the sod was' turned over and planted, giving the largest yield we ever had. President Hoppman — I hope both Mr. Owen and Mr. McCann will, at some fu- ture meeting, give us the precise figures of the cost of production so that we may havethe' full lesson. Mr. BimjINGS — Don't Mr. Owen think tobacco is an exhausting crop. Mr. Owen — I never raised much and therefore cannot say from my own expe- rience, but I know it is so regarded. Mr. BiLMNGS— I never knew a man to plant it on his poorest field. On the con- trary, it always has the most fertile land, and this, after being stimulated by ma- nure, to enable it to produce full crops of tobacco, is left with enough fertility to produce less exacting crops, but I appre- hend that the mere fact that tobacco has been raised does not constitute any 'fit- ting for another crop. Mr. Owen — My father has been a farm- er for more than fifty years and he re- gards corn as one of the most profitable crops which he raises. Mr. Jambs McOaNN — Last spring, in discussing the average production of corn, it was estimated that thirty-five bushels to the acre was a full average for the corn lands of this valley. Since then I have conversed with many farmers upon this matter, and as many as three out of four pronounce the estimate too high. I am inclined myself to consider it so. These crops reported at the fair should not be considered in estimating the average yield. It is not fair to put them forth as anything like a possible average. So far as George McCann's crop is concerned, I know it would be unfair, for that had very costly preparation, as he has told you, and I know it had everything done to pro- mote growth. Besides all that, this has been a very fruitful year, bringing all the advantages together. I am satisfied thirty-five bushels to the acre is a full av- erage. Gen. DivEN. — And so I think. Some fields yield thirty-five bushels of wheat to the acre under favorable circumstan- ces, but the average is much less. Ac- cording to statistics gathered a few years ago the average yield of wheat in this State was estimated at twenty bushels to to the acre. In Pennsylvania it was less, while in Michigan it was only seventeen bushels to the acre. 95 Whether it is profitable to raise corn or not depends on the ground used, whether that is suitable or not. I had a piece a few years ago that produced a lit- tle over one hundred bushels of shelled corn to the acre. Before that crop the land was in meadow, but finding it diffi- cult to get a good firm sod I planted it and raised that good crop of corn. The situation was suitable. The same field is again in corn, the sod having again fail- ed. It was plowed last fall and was plant- ed in the usual season Not much care has been given to it, not what it needed, but I invite any gentleman present to visit it, and I think that he will see that it is as good as the crop which Mr. Mc- Cann has reported, raised by so great an expenditure of manure. The simple reason is that the land is suited to the crop. Oats will not do well on that field, nor will rye. They will lodge. I want the' field in grass, but I am at a loss to know the proper course to establish a good sod on it. I have raised corn on the gravely flats, but I do not regard such soils as the best for the crop. I used to prefer a good clover lea, but of late years the plants have been so much injured by worms that 1 have formed the habit of using stubble lands, which are less infested with these pests. W. A. Armstrong. Should we not ex- pect on good corn lands at least twice as many bushels to the acre as the average production of wheat in the State ? Mr. HoTOHKiN. I think as much as that, or more, might fairly be expected, and if so, there ought to be profit in rais- ing corn. I cannot see that there is much more cost to cultivate an acre of corn than to perform all the operations on an acre of wheat. Corn can be kept until paying prices come, if not enough is off- ered when it is produced. Two years ago there was little variation in price for a whole season. I had a car load arriving from the west every week in the year, and it cost me there twenty-two cents per bushel, put in the car and started. Our farmers in this portion of the State may be considered as having good business if they can produce of corn double the average of wheat, and, on suitable lands, my observation is that they exceed that. Mr. Owen and Mr. Garb presented arguments to show that Mr. McCann's cost of production was improperly esti- mated. The stalks had not been counted at all and thus it was entirely wrong to charge up the whole cost of manure, much of which must remain to augment fertility. Mr. Owen raised the query, might not ten loads of manure, applied directly to the hills, have produced just as good a crop as the whole spread over all the surface ? If so, he insisted forty- two loads should have their cost charged over to future crops. Both declared that such crops could hardly be reduced with- out profit, direct or indirect, and if a fair division of benefits were made in almost all cases direct profit would be shown. Later the discussion ran upon the pro- per means of saving winter fruits, espec- ially apples, but as the hour of closing arrived it was found that the fruit raisers had so many facts to report that the next meeting would have its time fully occu- pied in considering them and the subject was accordingly put over, with Messrs. David Conklin and Fletcher Cabr as- signed to the opening. Saturday Eve., Oct. 10, 1874. At the meeting of the club a week ago, President Hoffman put the inquiry, at a late hour, " What are the best ways of preserving fruit for winter ? " The rule being to close discussion at precisely nine o'clock, there was not sufficient time to narrate the practices of the several members who rank as successful fruit raisers, and who give careful attention to the saving ; but there were several 96 who gave brief answers, showing that it was possible to preserve ordinary winter apples to the next spring, or later. Among these, Fletcher Carr and David Conklin detailed experiments by which fruit which commonly perishes during winter, had been kept in good condition months later, and without great expense of care or labor. Mr. Conklin, speaking of the proper time to pick apples, said : ' ' My crop of apples requires about two weeks for the careful picking, for at this season there is always more or less bad weather, so in order to finish as early as I like, I usually begin on the first of October. I think the later picked apples keep better than the earlier. " Gen. DiTEN. — May not that be owing to the fact that they are better ripen- ed ? Immature fruit wiU. not keep well, and there are varieties of winter apples which, on the first of October, hardly have thorough ripening. Tl\e best suc- cess I ever had was one season when my apples were picked so late that there were fallen leaves in which to pack in the barrels. The leaves were gathered and a layer placed in the bottom of the bar- rel and on that the apples in a single layer, then leaves again and so the bar- rels were filled with alternate layers of leaves and apples. The fruit kept per- fectly until the next summer. I do not remember now whether the leaves were the fallen ones from the apple trees or not, nor do I suppose it is of any impor- tance. Cut hay or straw would probably be quite as good. The idea is that the fruit was saved from pressure and kept from contact by which the long keeping was promoted. President Hoffman. — I made a experi- ment once with Esopus Spitzenburg ap- ples, wrapped each separate one in paper and so packed in barrels and put away for winter keeping iaa cool cellar. They kept in good condition until late in May, but when the wrapping was removed I noticed the apples very soon decayed. Those not so pre'serYod rotted long before. For late keeping I should recommend wrapping each apple separately, or in some way to save them from contact and from exposure to the air. Gen. DrvBN — Yes, and keep them out of a cellar in which there is a furnace. Mr. Billings— Will not tightly headed barrels of apples keep better than open ones ? I believe so, and that they will keep even better than on racks. Mr. Conklin— I never head mine up for winter keeping. I fill the barrels and leave them in a cool place until severe weather, when they are removed to the cellar and set in tiers one on another as high as the situation will permit and the topmost barrel loosely covered. Mr. Hblleb — ^I have had better success with tight heading and stowed away in a place as cold as possible without danger of severe freezing. Even if the apples freeze a little in the barrels they are not hurt by it. Mr. Conklin— So far as the cold is con- cerned that is right, I believe. There is frequently frost adhering to the inside of my barrels, but no hurt comes to the fruit. Gen. DrvEN — Most of my winter apples are brought from Watkins, where they are kept in a cool cellar, coming out sound and fresh, but very soon after put- ting them in my cellar, where there is a furnace, they begin to decay. At this stage of the discussion it be- came evident that the evening would not suffice for all to express their views, and accordingly the subject was put over to the present meeting, with the saving of vegetables for winter use added, and Messrs. Fletcher Carr and David Conklin appointed to open the discussion. But as the hour approached the closing show- er of the rainy week set in with an ac- companiment of thunder which kept 97 timid members at ' home, by which the meeting was made very thia ia numbers Even President Hoflfraan did not a|)p«ar, but his place was well filled by George S. McCann, for whom lightniiig and thun- der, rain and mud, and even political conventions have no terrors, for with a fresh experience of all these he was promptly on hand and ready for duty, and quite unable to comprehend the rea- sons which deterred his brother farmers from attending the club. After uneasy delay in expectation of the fuller atten- dance, he called to order and announced the subject. Mr. Oonklin failed to ap pear, but his young associate, Fletcher Carr, was on hand and on him the chair- man called. PLE;rcHEE Cakr. — My experience in keeping winter fruits has not been ex- tensive, but I have made some experi- ments with apples by which I have gain- ed valuable knowledge. In the first place let me say, that much depends upon the picking. If this be not carefully per formed no efforts at long keeping will be successful. The only true way is hand picking and careful placing of the fruit in baskets, to be as carefully removed to the receptacle in which it is to be finally stored for winter keeping. Two J ears ago I picked two barrels of Nortbern Spy apple^ ou tlie tenth uf Oc- tober. All imperfect specimens were re- jected, only the^finest being packed, and these were wrapped separately in paper, and when so enveloped packed carefudy in the barrels and set away to save a- long as they would, firat in a place where the tempurature was just above freezing in fall weather, and after three or four weeks, when daager was imminent, they ■were moved without jolting or rough handling to the cellar, where the lids were a little tilted, in which condition they were left undisturbed until the tenth of May, when they were opened for ex- amination, and there were only three or symptoms of decay, doubtless imperfect specimens when packed, which my care had failed to detect. Satisfied that fur- ther preservation was possible, the sound fruit was again wrapped and repacked, and so kept until the fourth of July, at which time it was taken out for use and found to be fresh aud juiry, fully preserv- ed and with the mellowness of ripe fruit. For an )ther experiment I took one barrel of Bambos, picked in like careful man- ner, and packed in a barrel specially pre- pared by having slats fastened through the middle to supijort the fruit and leave a space for ventilation, which was sup- plied by holes bored through the staves, permitting free circulation of air through the space cut off by the slats, and of course giving a restricted circulation around the fruit. The.se apples kept well but not near as long as those ia the other ca>e wrapped so as to nearly exclude all air. I tried one other barrel of Rhode Lsland greeuings packed in dry chaff, without other means of preserv aiou, and that was an expensive experimeat for I lost the whole. Iq my j\idgraent the main requisites to late keepiug are careful picking at the right season, as careful handliug there- after, and no more thau is necessary, and .sep,a-,itiou by such means as I have indi- onted, which I believe will prove success- ful iu every case where the fruit is of the right character. As to the keeping of roots and vegeta- bles I do not feel as well prepared to speak, but I may say that in such experi- ences as I have had, beets, turnips, and other roots have kept well packed in dry sand, by which the air and light are ex- cluded. The chairman stated a case of several hundred cabbages now spoiling by the cracking of the heads, and asked if pre- vention were practicable. He had heard four apples in each barrel exhibiting it said that lifting so far as to start the 98 roots would olieck the evil, but a trial proved -wholly inefficient. Mr. Billings. — You can stop it by lift- ing them quite out of the soil and invert- ing them, in which condition they will probably keep until the proper season for making sauerkraut, which is the best thing to do with them. You have pro- bably made a mistake in setting, getting them out too early. Winter cabbage should be set so late that at this season of the year the heads shall not have reached full size, as they do before crack- ing. This month and the next are the best for the growth of heads for winter use. As to keeping apples, grapes and other fruits, I never have any trouble after they are put in the cellar. It comes be- fore that, while exposed in the orchard to thieves. If any one can tell me how to keep the accursed thieves away I shall have no trouble about winter keeping. Not a day passes but these marauders lug away bushels from the orchards in this vicinity. Even now I dare say the reason Mr. Oonklin is not here to tell what he knows about keeping apples, he is en- gaged in watching his orchard to keep some portion of the fruit for himself, for without such watching the thieves would get all. There are men, women, boys and girls every day and every night from the time his apples get big enough to use until they are all stolen or gathered, car- i-ying away immense quantities gotten by open shameless theft. Mr. HoTCHKiN. — I would suggest, as the best means of preventing these loss - es, that Mr. Billings gather these thieves into the Sunday School and give them instruction. Mr. BiiiMNGS. — No, that will not do. They are not going to be gathered for any such purpose. They make a busi- ness of gathering supplies on Sunday as long as there are nuts or fruit on the trees. Mr. HoTOHKiN. — WeU, say they have the instruction in winter then, when there are no enticements on the trees. Mr. Billings. — I must be permitted to doubt the efficacy of such influences. Mr. Owen. — If Mr. Billings is ambi- tious to become an office holder, the law makes him a deputy sheriff with power to arrest any trespassers on his orchards. Our laws have thrown every safeguard that legislation can provide around our trees and vines to preserve their fruit from such depredations, and yet I know that there are great losses sustained by those who attempt fruit culture in the vicinity of a city. A crop of nuts, es- pecially, for miles around is never left to the peaceable possession of the owner, however much he may prize them for winter use. The general testimony of the owners is that this discouragement is too great to make profitable culture pos- sible. Unless something can be done to create a wholesome public sentiment in regard to this matter, it would be as well to let all in together as freely as they please. Mr. Billings — I have hickory trees , which produce great crops of nuts amount- ing to many bushels, which I should like to have at least to supply the wants of my family and a few friends, but I rarely get a j)int. I could submit to this if it were all, but the effort to save brings up- on me the most opprobious epithets from the vile thieves against whom there is no adequate punishment, at least for the abuse ; and for the depredations, if an owner would have the penalties inflicted, he must take a great deal of trouble and this abuse which is worse. To-day I ar- rested a man in the act of gathering nuts from my trees, a full bag of which he had secured, but while fully intending to take him to the Recorder to be dealt by according to the statute, I was overcome by his plaintive pleadings and fine prom- ises to abstain from similar theft in the future, and so gave him his liberty and 99 Ms booty. We buy land and pay the taxes and are robbed by day and by niglit of the fruits which are our own. We are too tender to bring punishment upon the offenders, while they are tough to stand all the odium of theft and bold enough to heap personal abuse upon the anxious owner if he ventures to malte a feeble, modest effort to preserve some portion of his own fruits for the use of his family. S. M. Cabr. — Those charges are too true, but I think something might be done if the offender could be brought in- to our Sunday schools or otherwise under religious teachings. Certainly these are restraining influences, but those who steal do not enter the places where better practices are taught. It is a sorrowful fact that on any fine Sunday those of us who go down Walnut street to church may see two or three clubs of young men engaged in ball playing. They do not go to church — their parents do not go. The law prohibits this desecration of the holy sabbath, and yet the shameful spec- tacle, of which I have spoken, may be seen to-morrow if the day is flue. And those who go to church from this vicinity will return to flnd their trees despoiled. The day is chosen by the recldess evil ones who abound in the city, for spolia- tions through a circuit of miles around. Something must be done to check their lawlessness even if it be only in the in- terest of preservation of the peace and the quiet of the well disposed citizens who suffer long before they take the necessary steps to protect their private rights. The discussion of this matter consum- ed a great part of the session, because every one present had a grievance, the outrageous thefts of fruit reaching every one. The general sentiment seemed to favor vigorous application of the law un- til a wholesome public sentiment regard- ing private rights should prevail. The great laxity of morals in this regard was well illustrated by one gentleman, who narrated to a knot of listeners after the adjournment, a story of a minister who called to make a parochial visit at the house of a parishoner, and'flnding the doors closed and the family absent, he took a stroll about the ground^. Espy- a young pear tree with ripening Flemish beauties hanging on the branches, he plucked eighteen in number, which was all the tree bore. These he carried away, probably without a thought of wrong doing. But the truth was, they were the treasures of the owner, carefully watched and preserved with a sentiment a kin to affection, because they were the first fruit to reward years of care in the rearing of the tree, and this reward ap- propriated — yes, stolen by his spiritual guide and instructor. The keeping of grapes received brief consideration, none of the members pre- sent claiming to have much experience, and the principal speaker, a gentleman whose observation was extended, he hav- ing traveled through the finest grape dis- tricts of the world, carefully noting facts, and therefore well able to instruct, gave free expression to his opinions, but modestly requested that no report be made of his remarks, because not having personal experience, except to a limited degree, readers might be misled by his observations made during a few months of travel in a land where the practices were all new and therefore Uable to be misappreh ended. Mr. Thurston gave his experience in handling grapes for the market, in which he had been instructed by a foreign rais- er, who taught to gather the clusters without touching them, and in all the future handling to avoid removing the bloom by contact with the hand. His packing was affected by alternate layers of papers and clusters in boxes of fifteen or twenty pounds capacity, of such depth as to receive about four layers. From the clusters all immature grapes were 100 carefully removed by pointed scissors, and groat care was taken to pack witli full freshness, in wliich condition he claimed they might be kept through win- ter. He had sold many hundreds of pounds of the grapes so picked and pack- ed, and iu this market they invariably commanded from three to six cents per pound more than other equally fine fruit, more carelessly handled. An important matter he regarded the lifting the lids to allow the e.scape of evaporated moisture, and he recommended also that picking be done while the vines are quite dry. The heading of barrels of apples again coming up for consideration, the opin- ions of members were divided as to the propriety of the practice, many being in favor of complete exclusion of the air and pronouncing the so-called "sweating process" a complete delusion. But all agreed that very careful handling from the boughs to final use, was a necesijity to insure late keeping, and there was also complete agreement as to the necessity of a, low temperature almost to freezing, to preserve flavor and freshness, as well as to prolong the keeping. Saturday Eve., Oct. 17. 1874. There was again a light attendance, partly owing to the interest felt by many members in a political convention in ses- sion at Horseheads. The same influence operated to reduce the attendance at the last meeting, although the few who were iu, engaged earnestly in the discussion. In the history of the Club the fall meet- ings immediately preceding the aunual elections have been 'lightly attended, partly because of the considerable inter- est felt in the selection of men well suit- ed and qualified for the places to be fill- ed, and partly because at this season there is work to be done needing all the strength and energy of farmers. Much of the excellent corn crop is yet unhusk- ed, and thousands of bushels of potatoes are yet in the ground, besides the or- chards on many farms have yet their bur- dens of fruit. It is not wonderful that when Saturday night approaches, men who have labored diligently in their fields during the week are reluctant to go out of their way to discuss the subjects with which their physical energies have grap- pled until they are worn to the last de- gree of endurance. The farmers who are active members of the Club are them- selves vigorous laborers in their own fields. They are very sure to gather their corn and potatoes and apples before they give time to discussion of the methods. All this done, they come in to talk of the lessons they have learned, whether by success or failure, to devise plans for the future, and to develop those social quali- ties which give the chief enjoyment to farm life. A month later the chairs now Vitcant at the Club meetings will be filled, and the list of speakers will have a cor- responding increase, giving zest to the discussions and creating an interest which will extend over the wide field where these reports are read. President Hoff.m.^n called to order promptly on time and elicited from John Bridgman the first remarks which related to his perdoual want of fall pigs, which reminded the President that he himself had vacant pens to be filled when the proper stock shuidd ofler, W. A. Aemsteong suggested the pur- chase of thoroughbred Essex or Berk- shire, instancing the stock of Joseph Harris, of Rochester, and expressing the belief that more profit would be derived from the feeding of such pigs, even for home use, than from the mongrel in com- mon use. Mr. Bridgman made the objection that the first cost would be so high as to pre- vent all profit iu the feeding, to which answer was made that breeders like Mr. Harris who desire to sell only those ani- mals which approach perfection, for the 101 purpose of breeding, have always in their full pens specimens exhibiting faults in shape, lacking that symmetry which they have fixed as a standard, and these hav- ing ail the excellence for feeding of the handsome animals, because of their lack of beauty are oflfered at low rates for feeding, and if not sold for such use, are devoted to it by tlie breeders. It would be well if more attention should be paid to improvements in the breeds of pigs by which greater profits in pork, making could be made. The great necessity now apparent in this valley is for breeds which will fatten easily. Pigs which will dress tljiree huadred or more at eight months, make much cheaper pork than the course breeds which must have twenty months of feeding to reach such proportions, and the latter are as good as the average in this valley, while there is abundant proof that the crosses of the fine thoroughbreds on ordinary coarse sows, by good feeding, would easily make the weight named in the lesser time, and there was the farther argument that the pork so made is great- ly superior in quality. Instances were named of Berkshire crosses which had exceeded three hun- dred pounds weight at eight months old without a pretense of skillful feeding, and the argument was made that such success might just as well become general, if only the proper attention were given to the employment of pure bred males, looking always in the progeny to the capabilities of assimilating food rather than to color or great size. Mr. Owen — We have in our near neigh- borhood a breeder whose stock was origi- nally procured from Joseph Harris, and who could doubtless meet the wants nam- ed. Mr. Van Duzer, of whom I speak, had on exhibition at the late fair very fine specimens of Essex pigs, perhaps as good, for all purposes, as those offered by the older breeders. My farmer bought one of them, quite satisfied to pay the small extra cost. It appears to me that the farmers in this vicinity are behind in this matter. There need be no fear that all animals and articles of superior excellence will fail of a market. The truth is there is no difficulty in find- ing purchasers for whatever we have that is good. If one could see the inquiries that reach our secretary, not only from farmers within a circuit of a hundred miles, but even from distant States, for everything which belongs to better farm- ing, for better seeds, for nursery stock, and even for supplies which farmers gen- erally produce for themselves. Even now he is publishing a Vermont call for winter apples by the car load, and in his office are inquiries for steel plows and other implements. Such demands come from as far distant States as Texas. It will thus be seen that we need have no fears of a market for whatever is good. This should stimulate us to improvement. Whoever moves in this matter will be very sure of profit. Our situation is favorable. Our facilities for producing are all we could ask ; while the chances of marketing are beyond doubt far bet- ter than most of us realize. Mr. G. S. McOann, who has been for some years engaged in experimenting with the breeding of Cheshires, ven- tured the opinion that the crosses were better for feeeding than the pure bred animals. The President observing in the hall Mr. Hiram Ketchum, of Ashland, who is a large manufacturer of cider, which has an extended reputation for excellence, and Mr. C^rr, who also makes up thou- sands of bushels of apples every fall, seiz- ed the opportunity to bring out a state- ment of the processes by calling first on Mr. Ketchum, who said: ''The chief thing to be sought is a prop- er condition of the apples. To secure a good product, almost everything depends upon the quality of the fruit. First in 102 importance is ripeness. Apples must be fully matured to make good cider. With- out such maturity the cider may be suffi- cient in amount, and may present a good appearance but it will be lacking in qual- ity, and it will not keep as well. It does not have that richness, that body which is desirable and which is sure to be ncitio- ed in the cider made from fully matured apples with the other conditions of excel- lence, the most important of which is cleanliness. 1 have tried for years to stu- dy the proper requisites forthe production of good cider, and I am prepared to say after all my investigation that the chief things to be desired are full maturity in the fruit, and cleanliness in all the process of making, including, of course, the gath- ering of the apples, and this matter is one in which there is great need of reform. Farmers are very apt to be very careless in picking. The apples are often gather- ed very late, long after they have fallen, and the grass has grown up over them, or perhaps the orchards are sown to wheat, and the fall growth covers the fruit, and the blades are picked and all put together in wagons which are dirty by other uses, and in this condition the fruit is taken to the mill to be made into cider as though there was no need of care to insure a good product. It is impossible to get good cider out of fruit gathered under such conditions, unless hand picking should select from the lilthy mass the good apples free from dirt and fit to crush. It often happens that many loads of this careless- ly gathered fruit, are filled in the bms with a large proportion of rotten apples to damage farther the cider, and from these mixtures of filth and rot the manufactur- er is expected to produce a good kind of cider, when the truth is the task is im- possible. Even without the rot there can be no hope of good cider. "I have, by way of experiment, taken pains to wash and thoroughly cleanse the apples for a barrel or two of cider, using for the purpose a tub which would hold two or three bushels, stirring these around in successive waters until they were made clean. Take any ordinary apples which do not seem very dirty, and two or three bushels will make a barrel of water look very nasty. The cider made from apples so cleansed has proved to be much finer in quality than the ordinary average from carelessly picked fruit. "It would surprise many farmers to see what nice cider may be made from knotty, poor fruit, provided only these condit- ions of full ripeness and cleanliness have proper attention. It used to be claimed in days when cider was distilled for whisky, that such fruit gave the best product, and I am not sure but it did There is. no doubt they would produce more whisky than apples of mild flavor. "As to the grinding, it is important that it be done in the proper manner. I think it is better that the apples be prop- erly crushed rather than to have the flesh very much torn by graters. They are often so finely gi'ated the pomace has the consistency of stewed pumpkin, in which condition it will not release the juice. It is something like rotten apples which prevent good yield and spoil what is made. "With proper care in all the processes of making a barrel of cider, should draw down to the last just as clear as the first I have made many such barrels and I have had many returned to be filled, when I would find two or three pailsfuU of sed- iment consisting raainly of rotten pomace in the bottom of the barrel. Now that was all wasted to the purchaser besides the damage it effected to the cider." President Hoffman — When your cider is well made and put in good barrels, can you keep it during the working, if the barrels are air tight? Mr. Ketohdm — Of rourse not in ordi- nary barrels. They would burst if tightly bunged. I have heard of a man who had barrels made of staves an inch and a half in thickness, and well hooped, who put 103 in his cider and bunged it tight, the bar- rels being stoat enough to resist the pres- sure. He said his cider kept sweet and fresh through two years when so confin- ed. President Hoffman — Do you crush or grate? Mr. Ketchum — I have crushed and grated. My first experiments were with the old Hiokok mill, run by horse power. I could not set it fine enough to suit my ideas of the proper grinding, so I dressed down the grater and filed down the cogs in the effort to get something like crushing. I found better and better work followed my efforts. I then took the grater out and made a smooth cylin- der which did not permit the apples to enter fast enough without a pressure from above. I provided tor tliat, and now use one smooth iron cylinder and another smooth one of wood covered with zinc, in which tacks are driven thickly providing for grating. These run so clo.sely that a small apple seed must be squeezed by the passage through. Witli tliese I can grind fifty bushels, and the groiiad pro- duct piles up below instead of spreading out in the vat. I have seen Mr. Low- man's mill, which is provide 1 with a small cylinder, arranged to run at a high rate of speed, and it reduces the apples to pulp, by which I regard the yield as di- minished, and the prodact is also infer- ior. I learned by experiment with a small hand machine that too fine pomace would not yield the juice. Take a hand- ful of fine pomace from a cheese which has been pressed and watered until it will yield no more, and hand squeezing will show that it is still saturated. Besides the palp mixes with the cider and injures the keeping properties. The great secret of keeping is in the cleanliness and free- dom from pomace. President Hoffman — If the ground apples are immediately pressed, is the ci- der as fine as when they are kept a few hours ? Mr. Kbtohum — No, I think it is better to let them lie a few hours. There is certainly better color and less of raw ap- ple flavor. President Hoffman — Have you ever tried Harrison apples, so that you can de- cide whether they are better for cider than the common kinds ? Mr. Ketchum — Not exclusively. I have used them, but always in connection with others, so that I cannot say how desira- ble they are. Mr. Oaee — .Ifter a long experience in cider making, I feel prepared to say that the methods indicated by Mr. Ketchum are correct. Especially in the matter of cleanliness he has not enforced,tlie lesson too much. Farmers are very careless about the picking. They do not seem to understand that good cider cannot be made from rotten fruit mixed with other filth. I remember one who brought his apples to my mill in such a condition that I could not receive them, and I therefore told him he could unload them for my hogs or draw them home again. One half or more of the fruit was rotten, and from that he expected good cider, which was simply impossible. Much of the difficulty in keeping cider is chargeable to the pomace which passes into the barrels. Keep that out by any process and you can keep the cider sweet. If much of it gets in it tends to spoil the cider, besides the room it takes in the barrel. I can take cider after it begins to work and by rectifying in such a manner as to remove all the pomace, arrest fer. mentation. In one instance I did this in December and kept the cider fresh until the tenth of the next May. There is, however, a serious difficulty in the way of producing first-class cider. It is in the fact that not enough is paid for it' to recompense all the care required in the making. Mr. WiNraENSHAn, of New York— I have observed in Dutchess county the old 104 cider makers "had a process by which they produced a very flnearbicle. Issao Hayt, a noted maaiifaotiirer, made cider that kept well for years. I know he was very pai'tieular about the apples, and he ground them by much the same process as the gentleman who first spoke on this subject has described — one smooth'cylin- der of iron and another of wood. The cider weat into large vats that would hold, say three hogsheads each. There it was suffered to I'emain until the pomace and other impurities had settled, and a seum risen also to the top, which latter would be the thickness of one's linger. — When this scum began to crack, the cider was drawn oil into barrels or hogsheads, and so taken to New York, where it was racked olf and bottled. In this condition I know of an instance in which it was sent to San Francisco and kept for ten years, at the end of which time it was not very hard. Mr. [lOTCHKiN — I have not much ex- perience in making cider, but I can nar- rate what was told me by a Catholic bish- op who was a fellow voyager, and with whom I had the pleasure of drinking a bot tie which he said was made in Bordeaux. He described the process. The apples of which it was made were not ground They were crushed by hydraulic pressure and the cider left in large vats uutil it reached the proper condition, when it was filtered, and after that rectified and put up in casks or bottles ; I suppose fit, benefitted by setting largely of them for the sole purpose of producing cider apples. They are not large, but yield abundantly and make the fioest cider. Mr. HoTOHKiN — Will Mr. Ketchum say which is the better process, crushing or grinding the apples? Mr. Ketchum— I should certainly pre- fer crushing if I had any means to effect it. I remember one season I had some nice white apples picked in the fall, to make up the last cheese, and I had aa order for cider for family use from a gen- tleman in the city. The product of those clean, white apples was so colorless I disliked offering it to him. It looked like water, but it was the last of the sea- .son and I could not do better, so I ex- plained the matter to him and he took the cider. The next fall I was invited to his house to dine, and a bottle of that ci- der, previously opened, was brought out and proved very fine. He insisted, how- ever, that another bottle not before opened be brought, which was done, and I never tasted any better. It proves only that color is not needed to make cider good. Another matter which I should not neglect to meutioain speaking of the com- mon packages, is the common fault of mu8ty barrels, or must anywhere in the process, even musty straiv brought in the wagons with the apples. A very little must will spoil the cider made from a hundred bushels of apples — there is no -Will you give his bishop of for use. The bottle I consumed with him j help for it. It may make up right in aU other respects and may look well but the must will spoil the taste entirely. President Hoffm:a.n — Is there no pro- cess t ) cleanse musty barrels? Mr. Ketohcm — I have tried various ways but .so far without satisfactory results. Potcish having been recommended I have been giving that a trial, but I cannot say how it has succeeded. I think it may be set down as a hard matter to cleanse mus- ty barrels and I should prefer not to use them. was remarkably fine, President Hoffman- address? Mr. lIoTOHKiN — He was tin New Mexico. Mr. Carr— The President inquired about the product of Harrison apples and was not definitely answered. While I have never made a whole cheese of this variety I have used enough to know that it is greatly superior to the ordinary kinds. Our farmers, I am sure, would be much 105 Mr. HoTCHKiN — The Prencb. use carlooys which are more easily kept clean and are as cheap as barrels. Mr. Ketchum — I have read lately that small packages willnot keep as wellas larger ones.and it is true so far as wooden packages are concernedj the reason being that there is more contact with the air. Wood admits air through its pores, as may he proved by drawing from a cask without vent until it ceases to run, and the next day a trial will succeed again, showing that air has entered through the wood. Now the exclusion of air is an essential condition to the preserva- tion of cider and glass may therg tore be con- sidered better than wood for saving it. The main thing for us to look after, how- ever, is greater cleanliness to which our far- mers mast be educated before we can have first-class cider. President Hoffman — The lessons to be derived from this discussion are, first that which has just been stated — cleanliness. And then the experience of these cider inakers points also to the excellence of Harrison ap- ples for cider. I have made some effort to produce this variety for the purpose of using for cider. The cultivation of Harri- son apples will, to some extent, prevent the depredations of fruit thieves, for they are not enticing to the taste, and they are smaU, but for the purpose named, they are easy to gather, good yielders and vigorous growers. I recommend orohardists to lop the branches of those trees which bring no profit, whether .because of valueless fruit or barrenness and graft in Harrisons which are sure to bring profit. The cider made from them is worth much more per barrel than the product of the common va- rieties. The discussion here ran upon wine mak- ing and was very interesting, but being chiefly the observations father than _ the practical experience of the members, it is withheld. One matter, however, was noticed and had entire concurrence of all who were present, which is worthy of mention. It was hearty earnest condemnation of all the com- pounds made from currants, elder berries and other berries and miscalled wine. There is in them nothing of the vinous principle, although enough of alcohol, which is not wine. The addition of sugar converts into alcohol, thus bringing intoxicating poison to the mixtures which' is really the only incen- tive to their manufacture. The subject for the next meeting is "Fall Plowing." S vTUBDAX Eve., Oct. 24, 1874. In the history of the Club, the few weeks immediately preceding the general election have always sho wn a thin attendance, which is due to the fact that other attractions en- tice even steady farmers, who always work up some partisan feelings or who delight to put themselves in the way of political influ- ences. The power which they exert through their votes makes them worth propitiating, and accordingly fine entertainments are pro- vided in the way of speeches by famous ora- tors, at the expense of the patriots who hold office or desire. This evening, with a flood of moonlight and a delicious October air, farmers prated of their corn fields and their husking while they marched to the Opera House, where free seats invited them to lis- ten to the finished oratory of a famous man. Only votes were required to reward all the eloquence. It is well. There is a time for every purpose under the sun. The first enquiry at the Club was by Mr. Fred. Mills, who wanted to know the chek,p- est and best way of conducting water fraom spring to his buildings, a distance of forty rods, with a fall of not more than ten feet . Permanance of the water course he regarded as an important matter, and he suggested also that the exposed situation would require especial safeguards against freezing. The soil through which the course must be cut is principally clay. "Wooden pipe would no doubt work well for a time, but decay sooner or later ipakes removal necessary. W. A. Aemstkong. — Good cement pipe, well laid below frost is the cheapest way in which the water may be safely carried. But, to make it sure, it must be put down so deep that the expense of making the ditch will be a material item of cost . Three feet in that clay soil wUl be very safe. Possibly two and 106 a half feet would answer against frost, but the possible injury to the pipe by wagon wheels passing over when the ground is wet and soft, or tbe pressure of horses feet when plowing over the pipe makes the greater depth safer. And besides if the water is to be used for drinking, it is kept at a lower temperature. In making cement pipe no greater degree of skill is required than for the efficient use ' of our common farm machinery, although a little experimenting for the purpose of ac- quiring an acquaintance with the require- ments would be necessary before venturing upon the real work. After obtaining the proper material the tools needed are very simple, being simply a long narrow box to serve as a mold for the prepared cement, and a round stick the size of the desired ori- fice. The stick should have a very slight taper. The work is done by laying the ce- ment in the box placed in the bottom of the ditch where the pipe is to be, the stick occu- pying the place of the proposed conduit, and of course surrounded by cement. As soonas all is properly packed and the cement has set sufficiently to prevent closing, the stick is drawn forward, not quite away from the section laid, and then the box moved for- ward, when the operation is repeated, mak- ing a second section of pipe united to the first with the orifice continued by the stick which had not quite left the first. This operation is repeated until the whole length is completed. It is easy to see that no great degree of skill is necessary to perform the work. The main thing is to get material of the right kind and to mix the cement and gravel in the right proportions and the proper consistency. AU this is learned by the preliminary trials. Such pipe well laid is practicably indestructable when placed below the reach of frost and injuries which come from passing vehicles or from the tread of animals. President Hoffman — I know good success has been attained in the use of such pipe, but I think it is very important that the best material be used. I made a trial once with what was called the best Syracuse water lime, and the work failed because the mix- ture aid not set properly. "When the stick was drawn forward the cement would settle and close up the orifice. After repeated attempts to make pipe of that material I was obliged to abandon it. I would recom- mend Mr. Mills to procure the best Rosen- dale. James MoCann — My mind has been occu- pied by this subject for some time. I have a spring sixty rods from my barns, from which the water is brought in wooden pipes laid about seventeen years ago. Part of the way is through gravel soil, and part through clay. In the latter the pipe has remained good, unless it be now decayed, but in the gravel in has been once replaced and now the course has broken by some means so that while the water enters the pipe at the source it does not pass through to the barns. I have been planning to lay the whole over with wooden pipe, but I should be glad to find something better without greatly in- creased expense. Perhaps this cement will do, but I have been discouraged by a man who told me a few days ago that he had tried it and found the difficulty named by the President, ^he settling of the cement filled in the pipe so that his work was lost. Mr. BiLLiNas — I saw some men engaged in laying Rosendale cement for the Water Works Company a few days ago, and it set as fast as they could use it. I think that with good material there need be no appre- hension of trouble on this score, and with poor material failure ought to come. President Hoffman — No doubt much of the trouble comes from the use of common bank sand. The better way is to go to some gravel bar along the river and get clean, washed sand and gravel, which, with good Eosendale cement, would insure Setting and no doubt, very hard, firm pipe. W. A. Abmstbong — Certainly, common sand, having considerable loam intermixed, is wholly unsuited to this work. Clean gravel is the proper material with which to mix the cement — nut coarse, but rather fine stones with sharp angles. With this, set- 107 ting is quick, and when thoroughly hardened the work is like rock. On the farm which I now occupy there is a pipe made of such material, put down more than twenty years ago, and still efficient, . except that it has been injured by pressure from above, which would not have happened if it had been put down to a sufficient depth. The lower por- tion taken up because of such injury broke up like stone and when exposed for a whole year to the action of the elements still had the firmness of rock. Mr. Mills — I have been told that such pipe would not bear the pressure necessary to raise a head of water. W. A. AaMSTEONG-pOf course no great head should be put upon it until it is firmly set, nor even then, but there is no difficulty whatever with a head of ten or fif- teen feet if the work be properly done and if a greater head is needed, the pipe should be reinforced with a surrounding layer of cement. As to the cost it need not be half that of wood, with the further advantage that it will never rot, whether laid in clay or gravel soil. If Mr. Mills desires to attem pt its use, he can find in the American Agricul- turist, for November 1874, puts of all the tools used in the work, and very full direc- tions about the manner. A few cents expen- ded for that number wiU return him many dollars of saving in the laying of his forty rods of pipe, and he need take no trouble to find a skillful workman for he can do it all himself. Mr. McCann — My ai-rangements being made I think I shall lay wooden pipe again. Now I would Uke to ask if duiabUity would be promoted by coating the wood with gas tar. President Hoffman— I think not. I have .tried in it in setting fence posts and I have set posts without it. So far as I can see there is no difference in the lasting. They all rot whether, sap or heart posts, and whether coated with tar or not, in my ex- perience without appreciable difference of time. In Mr. McCann's case I would suggest iron pipe, inasmuch as he desires a lasting conduit and has proved the unreliability of wood. Mr Mills — I ascertained the cost of iron to-day. For three-eights pipe eight cents per foot, or if lined with enamel nine cents per foot. President Hoffman — ^No such pipe should be used. The bore is too small. One inch pipe is as small as should be used to con- duct water. It is a very common mistake and the cause of many failures, that pipes of insufficient calibre is used. Such work is expensive at the best, but it should not be spoiled by stinting the expense to the use of improper means. Perhaps iron would not be the best material, but I am very sure that the small iron pipe named would not be reliable. On the subject of fall plowing, selected for this meeting. President Hoffman called Mr. Ezra Koekwell, who said ; "The practice of plowing land iu the fall for crops the next season does not meet my approval, except under special conditions. Sod land of rather heavy character may sometimes be profitably plowed iu the fall, but as a rule I do not think it is the best time for even such land. I have tried it and have tried fall plowing of stubble lands, generally without good result. In my experience grass seed has not taken so well as on similar lands plowed in the spring. This experience has been on hUl lands. Perhaps fall plowing on the gravelly fiats might do better. I have lately learned of a farmer near Horseheads, who plowed a field last fall and a portion of it he crossed in the spring and sowed all with oats. On the part crossed his crop was almost worth- less, while on the portion not crossed he had a moderate crop and the grass seed showed a like difference in favor of the piece not crossed. He thought the failure both of the oats and the grass on the cross-plowed land was due to the dryness of the soil, and that it was made to dry out more quickly by the crossing. I conclude that fall plowed land 108 should not be crossed iu tlie spring, t>ut it should "be well harrowed before sowing the seed. Two years ago I plowed part of a field in the fall and the remainder in the spring, when all was sowed to spring wheat. The spring plowed portion yielded the bet- ter crop without any reason that I could dis- cern, except the time of plowing. The seed- ing of grass was also better on the spring plowed portion. Land having roots and bushes, of which to dispose, I should always plow in the fall, be- cause there is more time to spend in J irking them out, and because the freezing which they get is excellent to kill them. Any time is good for sroh land but late fall is the best of all. So also might foul land be profitably fall-plowed, by which tue weeds and foul seeds would stand some chance of being frozen to death." President Hoffman — Have you ever ob- served the effect of fall plowing on the sec- ond crop ? Any loss of fertility ? Mr. Rockwell — 1 have not, although I have in mind a piece which was plowed in the fall to get rid of a troublesome growth of m.ustard, and the next season it raised a fine crop of buckwheat, after which it was again fall plowed, and the following spring s owed to oats, which proved a failure. There might be other causes, however, than the fall plowing. Mr. Feed Mills — My experience has been very different, and I must say in favor of fall plowing for hill lands. Last fall I had a fourteen acre field which I began on and did not finish until spring. Nearly all the field, including the fall plowed portion, was sowed to oats, and the crop was certainly better on the fall plowed. As the land lay it was convenient to plow around it, which I did, so giving a fair test as to quality of soil. I do not think there was any material difference in thenumberof bushels to the acre raised on the two portions, but it was plain that the oats raised on the fall pi owad ground were heavier and brighter, and li.tie is also now a plain difference in the seeding of grass in favor of the fall plowed. On this the clover shows well and the timothy is promising, while on the former there is no clover to be seen and but little timothy. One great reason why fall plowing proves so unsatisfactory to some farmers is, that it is done too early. I think that explains one failure of which Mr. Rockwell spoke, for I remember he plowed in September with some thought as he told me, of sowing rye. Nov land plowed at that season gets afterward all the fall rains and is beaten down hard. I would prefer to have the work done as late as possible, so that the furrows may lie losely when winter sets in and they will come out loose in the spring. Mr. James McGann. — Which part ripened the oats earlier, on the field partly fall plowed or partly spring plowed ? Mr. Mills. — I do not think there was any difference in the ripening between parts of each sowed on the same day. The oats were ripe so that we cut through both at the same time. There is another reason why fall plowing is unsatisfactory to some farmers, and that is in the imperfect preparation they give the surface for the seed in the spring. It needs more work to fit for the seed, but there are- many who drag over lightly and then sow. Of course the seerl cannot take hold of the hard ground, and the crop proves a failure when the fault is in not doing the work re- quired in the spring. My neighbor, Mr. Harrington, plows a great deal in the fall and I have watched his operations several years. In the spring he harrows the fall plowed land at almost the expense of time that would be required to plow, and he gets no failures. President Hoefman. — Did you ever ob- serve the second and third crops on fall plowed land to note loss of fertility ? Mr. Mills— 7I never noticed that land was made poorer by th e process except by very early plowing. I think the soil is materially injured by September plowing for a crop to be put in the following spring. Now, in the last of October is a good time to begin and m November is the best of tlie montlis for fall plowing. Mr. J. F. Beecheb — My experience proves the correctness of Mr. Mills theories. In eighteen years of tilling of hill lands I have fall plowed a great dealj always having tried to get as much of the work done in the fall as possible and invariably my crops, whether oats, spring wheat or grass,have proved bet- ter on the fall plowed than on the spring plowed. It has often happened that the test has been made in the same field by portions left in the fall unfinished, which were plow- ed in the spring, giving Eilways inferior yields. One season a twenty-five acre field which I tried to plow in the fall proved to big a, job for the time allotted, so I had a portion left over. The fall plowed I got into wheat and oats in March, and then plowed and put in the remainder. The yield of each kind of grain was nearly twice as great on the fall plowed as on the spring plowed. For grass seeding also I have great pre- ference for fall plowed land, because it takes better, and I think it holds better. In my experience I have often found several days difference in the ripening of oats sowed on the same day on land plowed part in fall and part in spring, always in favor of the fall plowed. And I never saw any injurious ef- fects to the land — no loss of fertility or hurt- ful chang3 of condition. My soil is clay and loatn with 'but little that is gravely. As to crossing in the spring, I have made some experiments without beneficial results and I would set it down as a rule that fall plowed land should not be again plowed in the spring. Mr. McCann. — My observation and experi- ence are in accord with these gentlemen who favor fall plowing of such lands as they have. I think nearly all the hill lands may be safely and profitably plowed in the fall, but such soils as mine, gravely plains, are not at all benefitted, they are perhaps even injured by fall plowing. Loose enough at the best they do not not need to be stirred in the fall. Such lands admit early work in the spring, so there is no argument for fall plowing. Mr. EocKWBLL — I plowed last faU a por- tion of a five acre field and finished in the spring. The crop on the spring plowed was very much the better. I felt sure that I harrowed the fall plowed very well. Mr. Mills — I thinir I can account for the difference.. The fall plowed portion has never before been plowed and it did not turn up suitable soil for the growth of the crop. It was new and raw and would not have brought a good crop if plowed in the spring Mr. EooKWBLL — There is truth in that, but not all the fall plowed was of that char- acter. President HofebA-N — I add my testimony to that offered by Messrs. Mills, Beecher and others who favor fall plowing for land com- posed largely of clay or, in other words, for heavy soils, and such is the character of nearly all our hill lands. I have had some doubt about the influence of such plowing on the crops in after years, for there ar- farmers who contend that it is, in the end, ruinous to land. No evidence to prove it has come to mj notice, but I have fancied there might be some truth in it, and have therefore tried to bring out such evidence, if there were any here. Pall plowing on my heavy land has cer- tainly brought better results than spring plowing, and the comparative test has been made in the same field under like conditions in other respects. On one occasion I plowed a strip in the fall in the ordinary manner, one rod wide, around a five acre field. Then with a double Michigan plow plowed three acres twelve inches deep, 1 eaving two acres in the middle for spring plowing. One acre of this was plowed twelve inches deep, and one acre to the ordinary depth, when all was sown to barley. I could see no difference i;i the crop in favor of the d eep plowing, but all the fall plowed gave more satisfactory results than the spring plowed. On the former the barli^y ^tood up well on strong straw, making the gathering nearly as easy as oats, while on the latter it crinkled badly, and of course did not give as fine grain. 110 Mr. EoOKWELL — On our hill lands I have noticed that the raw soil turned wo in the fall runs together during the spring thaw- ing until at last it is as tight and compact as if it had never been plowed. President Hoffman — On such land make furrows about two and a half feet deep at such intervals as may be needed, and lay in them drain tile, by which the surplus water which causes that running together will be drawn off. Mr. Beeoher — That is his want. I have laid pipe in such soils and found the condi- tion so improved that I could go on early in the spring to work where before I had to wait beyond the season, and so, of course, failed of good crops. The next meeting will discuss the breeds of pigs, with especial reference to the wants of small farmers and those engaged in mixed husbandry. Satuhday Evening, Oct. 31, 1874. Several members who have not heretofore attended the fall meetings came in, although the evening was unpropitious. Interest is mahifestly increasing. "When the political excitement incident to the annual election shall have passed, the hall will be well filled at every meeting, no doubt, as in previous years. One of the first rules established by the Club was that "No political discussion shall ever be permitted at the meetings." No single infraction of this rule has ever been made, nor would one be possible under the stern presidency of the present executive ofBcer. Even the merits of candidates for office are never presented in any casual way during the session. The rule is wholesome, no doubt, but there are times when many of the enthusiastic partisan workers stay away rather than place themselves under the in- hibition. They must have fields where the ebullition of party spirit can work without restraint, and where they can cultivate ora- tory v/ithout the difiiculties which usually beset plain truth tilling. As the season for social festivities ap- proaches the Club begins to consider its an- nual public reunion, and to receive invita- tions to the similar pleasant parties arranged by kindred societies. The first matter pre- sented at this meeting was the following formal invitation from Genesee county : "The members of the Elmira Farmers' Club are respectfully invited to meet with the Genesee County Farmers' Association on Saturday, November fourteenth, at one o'clock p. M., at the Court House in Batavia. [Signed] J. G. Faego, Secy. Unfortunately the day selected is the reg- ular Club day, these 'meetings being held every Saturday, but so strong was the dis- position to attend that a division of forces will probably be effected, giving a delegation to Batavia without suspending the regular order of meeting. The question assigned to this meeting be- ing "Pigs, with especial reference to the wants of small farmers and those engaged in mixed husbandry.'' The following letter from Joseph Juliand of Terrace Hill stock farm, Bainbridge, Chenango county, N. Y., was quite opportune. It must be premised that the letter was written partly as an an- swer to questions considered by the Club at one of its recent meetings, when some of the speakers advocated the use of pure breeds and recommended especially the Essex or the Berkshire, both breeds noted for their early maturity and the excellent quality of their meat, but both being objectionable to common farmers who have an unaccountable prejudice against all the breeds which arc blacK. Here is the letter : "About thirty years ago, the hog of the country vas a long nose, flat-sided, long- legged, long-bodied 'races.' I can call them nothing else. An animal that was turned by the dozen, as shoats, each fell iutj the woods, living upon nuts and tender roots, and in a good 'slack' year, would in fall and early winter become, if not fat, almost dou- ble in size, many of them wintering without a mouthful of extra feed, these, although good breeders, were most ravenous creatures of great power of lungs, but could be made of great size. One, years ago, was skinned, stuffed and remained thus in its true shape a long while in ,the Agricultural rooms at Albany, on exhibition. Its live weight was over 1,200 pounds. About that time Mr. Ill Erotoli, of Morris, Otsego county, N. T., im- ported the Berkshire from England. A few years later, Mr. Washburn, of Butternuts, N. Y., also made an importation. My father and myself purchased from that importation two sows and one boar. There was a preju- dice against black hogs. We sold a few. The half-bloods were scattered through the country, still there was no great demand for them. Asking a farmer why he did not pat- ronize the new breed, he says : "Your pigs make good halns and shoulders, and it costs little to keep them, but we board all our own hired men and we want good, solid, 'broad- side pork,' that , as they say 'will stick to their ribs and they can work on.' " "The new breed ran out but left its im- press, the noses were shortened, there was not quite so much music back of the house about feeding time. This was thirty years ago. From ten to fiifteeu years later, the report came up that certain Dutchmen in Chester county had most superior hogs. These were tried by many of our best farm- ers with good results. About this time Col. Morris, of Pordham, New York, imported some very choice Berkshires. Later, Mr. Crozier, of Northport, made extensive im- portations. From these gentlemen we re- newed our stock. The demand for them is increasing every year. These later importa- tions show the perfection to which an animal can be brought by careful and judicious breeding." "A debatable point is whether the large hogs for which Jefferson county and other counties in the western part of the State are so famous, are Jthe most desirable, or the finer Essex and Berkshire, whether one thousand pounds of pork can be made more cheaply and of Setter quality from two pigs, or from three. With us the dairy districts of Chenango, Otsego and Delaware, away from large centres of business, demand be- ing the home market only, nicely cured hams and shoulders meet a ready sale. These, the smaller Berkshires, and their grades supply in perfection. There is a great change in our modes of living. The dish of baked pork and beans, or huge pieces of boiled pork, is now seen upon our tables. So cer- tain am I, that the pure Berkshire boar, used upon our common sows, makes an un- equaled cross ; that in my report as execu- tive officer in charge of sheep and swine at our State Fair, I have recommended a spe- cial prize for the best pen of pigs — grades, the cross of a pure boar on different breeds, not bred for breeding purposes, but for the butcher only," "Within the past year I have filled several orders from parties in Chester County, Pa., sending to one gentleman there two sows in pig, to my imported boar "King William," the first prize boar in Albany in 1873. Mr. Frank L. Sellers, of Franklin County, Pa., writes me under date of October 12, 1874 : "The piejudice against black hogs is fast wearing away. The large Cheaters are dis- appearing, the pure Berkshires with its rich marking, short dished face, deep carcass, thick hams and shoulders, are taking its place. The pair of Berkshires you sent me ■ the Far- mer's Club that some of the members are in want of pigs. I am breeding and shipping Chester Whites, Berkshire, and Essex pigs, and I send out but those of my own stock. I would be glad to ship some to your sec- tion and I do not want any fancy prices as you will see by my price lists. I would like to ship a Chester white to you, and if you have any in your vicinity that are superior to him as regards ears, nose and general points I will not charge anything for him. "My Berkshires are perfect and my Essex good. If you can send me an order for five or six pairs at a time, I will make a deduc- 112 tion from the regular rates. My stock is ad- vertised in the Husiandman and I give refe- rence if desired. "Prices — Chester Whites, eight to ten weeks old, weight fifty to sixty pounds each, singly $12.00, in pairs, $20.00.— Twelve to sixteen weeks old, per pairs, $25.00. "Berkshire eight to ten weeks old, weight forty to fifty pounds each, ,^18.00." Edward Walter, Kennett Square, Chester Co., Pa. President Hoitman — Without any doubt very great improvement can be made by our farmers in their pigs if they will send to some of these pains taking breeders and get pure bred stock of the most improved varieties. If a, few should venture a small expense for this purpose, through their liberality they would have profit, and besides all the pigs in this vicinity would be soon improved in character. In my own pens 1 have now several of un- known breeds that eat voraciously, but do not fatten. They grow in frame without putting on fat. They are unprofitable, be- cause they have to be fed too long before they mature into good pork, and it may even be a question if they ever become as good a,nd fine in the quality of the meat they will make as the. pigs that mature earlier. — But at the best they have to be fed several months too long, by which they diminish the profits of pork making materially, if they do not render profit impossible. Viewing the matter in the light of profitable feeding, I might better kill them as they are, al- though' they would need another full year to reach full devirlopment. E. B. Beckwith, of Bradford county. Pa. — The great need of common farmers is a breed that will become fit for the barrel at seven to nine months age. Quiet, docile animals that will make growth and fat rap- idly enough to reach early maturity, thus relieving the farmer of the necessity of car- rying them through the winter before they can become solid, well matured pork. President Hoffman — There is much rea- son to expect all this in the finer breeds like the Essex and the Berkshire. There is in the letter of Mr. Juliand something, which permits the inference that between these breeds there is not much choice, for he cou- ples them as the Essex and Berkshire, and I have been reminded by the Secretary that Joseph Harris, who has made the Essex fa- mous by his judicious feeding and skillful selections, i« much in the habit when writ- ing of pigs to use the same coupled terms, Essex and Berkshire, or Essex or Berkshire. Of the two the Berkshires are somewhat larger, and possibly not quite so fine in the meat. It is possible, if not probable, that the Essex mature earlier. Both are black, the Essex entirely and the Berkshires ex- cept white markings on the legs and the face. Mr. Pitch — I fully agree with the Presi- dent that we need these pure breeds if for no other purpose, for the good they effect in the crosses with our coarser mongrels. I had a little observation of the good results to be obtained by the cross in the case of a pure Cheshire bought by Mr. McCann and crossed on a Chester .white sow. One of the pigs of that cross which I fatted weighed more than six liundred pounds at a year old, and d airing all the period of growth was chiefly kept on the most common food. Mr. Harris — The best I have ever had in dairy feeding were reputed Chester whites, but there is so much uncertainty as to the breeding that I can only say I bought them as that breed. I have fed half-breed Birk- shires which gave very good jeturns, so good that I should be quite willing to try again or to buy the pure breed pigs, if I could find them at reasonable rates. Mr. Armstrong — There may be better breeds than the Berkshire,but with a limited experience, in which the breed has come in for a good share, I must say that they have fine points. The hams, which are the finest portion of the carcass, are very superior, certainly better than the hams of common pigs. It is claimed, with the appearance of truth, that no breed gives a finer quality of meat than the Essex and the Berkshire. Take this in connection with their early maturity 113 and quiet dispositions, and there is every requirement that an ordinary farmer needs in his pigs. The popular prejudice against the black color will now stand any test of examination on real merits. What we need is the breed which will give the greatest return in meat of fine (luality, for the feed given, and it is quite likely we have this in the breeds named. The question of first cost in procuring the pure breed animals is that which deters or- dinary farmers from entering upon the im- provment, but this after all is a very small matter as the figures submitted to this meeting show, and in view of the advan- tages recognized and stated by all the speak- ers, is not worth considering. President Hoffman — The Chester whites do not seem to be a fixed breed. Their char- acteristics are not clearly defined. A few years ago when the Pennsylvania Statt Pair was, held at Williamsport, there .were twelve or fourteen pens of pigs marked Chester white, and looking them over I observed pigs with long hair.pigs with shore hair, pigs with long ears, pigs with short ears, in fact all types of the species, all pur- porting to be Chester whites. There was only a single characteristic in which ■ there was uniformity,all were white. Enquiring of the exhibitors I was informed that all were bred in Chester county, or from stock brought from there. Mr. Pitch — I think the Chester whites are not a distinct breed, but represent only the improvement on the best of the old kinds in that region, without such breeding as to fix their best characteristics. President Hoffman — Very likely. Giving a name to them does not make a breed. Many years ago I bought some Allegany cows which were called by farmers there "'N'oggerheads.'' They were streaked with white, good milkers, and had a certain uni- formity of look, but were not a distinct breed. A few days ago I bought another lot up there; and in looking over the cattle I observed traces of these characteristics still prevalent. W. A. Akmstbono — Do we want pigs of any breed ? May not many of our farmers find better profit in feeding thfeir refuse to poultry ? President Hoffman — I have managed to get along a year or two without pigs, with great discomfort, and I am now prepared to say we need pigs while we keep our farms. I am ready to buy a pair of Essex or of Berkshire, even if I must pay a fancy price. The latter, I am inclined to think, come nearer the standard I have fixed, having rather more size and greater proportion of ham, I think. Mr. Pitch — There are many of us who would be likely to buy these breeds if the breeders would advertise prices and save the trouble of correspondence. Thirty years ago in Chenango county there were many of the breed then called Berk- shire, and they were very easy keepers, al- ways fat but not large. Mr. BiLLiNos — It was down that way, where the big hog exhibited in the State Agricultural rooms at Albany had his breed- ing. I recollect a story of two gentlemen riding leisurely by the place where he was kept, wheu a farmer, leaning on his gate, attracted their attention, and they stopped to make a few inquiries about the country and its products, to which the farmer gave ready answer, until seeing the gentlemen about to leave, he said : "Have you never heard of our big hog ?" "No," said they, "hew big is he ?" "Big ! Why he is the biggest hog in America. He is right here in the pen. I show him to a great many people. It costs you only a quarter for both of you." "Is that aU ?" said one of them, reaching out the quarter, which was greedily seized by the farmer. "Go 'long," to his hors^. "What, aint ye goin' to see him ?" said ths farmer. "No," languidly replied the gentleman, "I take it for granted you are the biggest hog in America. We don't want to see the other one ! Go 'long." This finished the discussion of the pig question for the evening. A postal dBjvd from Addison, N. T., brought the question "What variety was the com 114 on |ilr. Owen's farm fbis season, was reported at tbe Club as having raised wMcli yielded two hundred and forty bushels from one acre ?" Mr. Owen being absent several gentlemen who had examined samples reported that it was of the common eight rowed yellow kind, with good length of ears, which, of course, might be expected in so large a yield. A statement was made concerning a field of corn comprising twelve aores,raised by E. B. Van Gorder, of A-ihland, in the pa.st sea- son. He turned over the sod in good season and as the laud had lain long in pasture he was apprehensive that the corn might be damaged by cut worms, and therefore told his men to drop plenty of seed to make al- lowance for the worms, but it was not dis- turbed by them, and so of course the plants stood very thick. Ifot finding time to thin them out by hand,the process being tedious, all were suffered to grow. He cultivated about twice each way and then hoed the field over, after which nothing was done, although he recognized the necessity for further work, but failed to find op- portunity to do it. He has just finished the husking and has twenty-four hundred bushels of ears from the twelve acre field. At this point the discussion ran into gen- eral conversation regarding varieties of seed, the probabilities of mixing, and the policy of procuring seed from distant places. On the last point Mr. Heller, who is eminently suc- cessful in raising corn, expressed strong preference in continuiDg indefioitely the seed, si-lecting always the best. Tiiis idea was supported by President Hoffman and Mr. Joseph Hoffman, the latter citing instances of mixed seed, which, by selection, he had in a few years made nearly or quite pure. As a curious fact he mentioned that in his ef forts to raise pure white ears from seed orig- inally red and white . he bad found the red for years after he ceased using the seed, being careful to plant only the pure white which, however, would occasionally sport in colors. Saturday Evening, Nov. 7, 1874. The beautiful sunny days, which, without interruption by a single storm, have for sev- eral weeks given farmers opportunity to bring up their fall work, have served also to bring that fatigue which follows severe la- bor, and by which attendance at these meet- ings has been diminished. But now the regular farm work being well over for the season, many of the old habitues of the Club gathered in, ma,king an attendance very re- spectable in numbers, and giving increased interest to the discussion. Several communications relating to the matters discussed at the previous meetings, were read, and formed topics for brief com- ment. Offers of Berkshire pigs from breed- ers in various sections of the State, naming terms favorable to purchasers, were duly considered, resulting in orders enough to put this county in condition to supply aU home demand in the future. No subject having been assigned to this meeting all were free to speak on any mat- ters connected with farming. W. A. Arm- strong said : "There is published in Philip's Southern Farmer a priz^e essay on forage plants, in-which Alsike clover is highly com- mended, and f he statement made that in clay soils of moderate fertility when once well set it affords abundance of good feed whether for pasture or meadow, and becomes permanently established for either use. How- ever true this may be at the South, for our latitude it is sure to mislead. Alsike makes good pusture while it lasts, but it has no such endurance as our native grasses, and except as pasture in its brief season will bear no comparison with our common clover. There are many in this hall who have given it full tests and they will perform a duty to farmers at the North in stating their exper- ience, by which they may counteract the evil effects which would follow full accept- ance of the teachings in the prize essay in which Alsike is so highly praised." Mr. Billings — I have sowed the seed with great hope of producing good and per- manent pasture, but disappointment fol- lowed. I had ten or twelve acres seeded with Alsike and found it made but small growth, and the plants did not stay. There was nothing like tbe amount of feed I ex- pected from the descriptions given of growth elsewhere — much less than on average pas- 115 tures of native grasses, and what there was, soon disappeared. , President Hoffman — I sowed Alsike clov- er two years in succession, sparingly it is true, but enough to satisfy me that it would not serve my uses. The first year after the seeding it looked well, and made a fine growth in every case, the pasture being of fine quality, but that season was all in which there was anything to commend. I had some made into hay which looked green and fresh as if it would be dainty feed for cattle, but by my standard it proved very inferior. E. C. Aemstbong — I have used it to a small extent and with the same results. It made excellent pasture while it lasted, but as hay it was worthless, my cattle would not eat it. After the second year it disap- peared. President Hoffman — That is all there is of it, good pasture while it lasts no after- growth and no permanency. But here is Mr. McCann who has also experimented with Al- sike andnow.has an opportunity to commend it if he found it worthy. James McCann — It has all been said. I regard it as a complete failure. W, A. Armstbong — The question of gras- ses is one of the most important which we have to consider. It lies at the foundation of successful farming. How to promote the growth and how to establish permanent sod are sabjects worthy of our study. I have just had half a years' supply of barn yard manure drawn and spread on my meadow, although I am not convinced that it is the best use to which the manure could be put. For years I have been making trials of top dressing grass lands, and while there are fine successes which I might report there are too many failures to discourage such use -of manure. None of us can p..fford to waste this source of fertility, and the experience I have had, together with my observations of the results on my neighbor's lands, lead me to the belief that there is sometimes great waste in top dressing meadows. There have been instances in my own practice where a. liberal appUoation of fine manure has pro- duced no improvement that could be dis- cerned, when the top dressed portion was compared with oth'er parts of the field not so treated, with the observations carefully made even during the second ar>d third years after the application. Miist I not conclude that manure was wasted ? If in such instances the land had been plowed and the manure spread upon the raw surface either in the spring or fall, and harrowed so as to incor- porate it with the soil, the beneficial effect would surely be visible in whatever crop might be raised, and if then grass seed be sown success would be assured. The desire to establish permanent grass is my only argument for continuing the fall speading of barn yard manure on meadow land. It must be admitted that the average of meadow land in all this county, and per- haps throughout this State, does not reach more than half the production of which it is capable. I shall not be disputed when I say that our average product is not more than one ton the acre. Can we rest satisfied short of two tons ? The desire to reach this stan- dard induces these continued experiments with top dressing even after the most con- vincing proof that, as conduoted,there is too often much real loss of manure. To have permanent meadow, or pasture, the surface must be fully occupied by grass. The s^id must be so close that whenever the foot falls in passing over, it shall be on a soft cushion of grass. Get this condition and there is re- liability in the sod. lo is meadow, or it is pasture, a safe dependence always. It is an argument against the plow forever. If it could be assured I should be quite willing to risk the waste of which I have spoken for ypars. There may be better ways to use tho manure. I know that when put on a newly inverted sod in the fall to be used for corn in the following season, it' returns full value in the crop, and it may do as well if put on in the spring, or possibly if spread on the sod, and then just the sod without greater depth be turned. It must certainly serve to enrich the soil even if its effects be not dis- tinctly seen in the first crop. And when used in any of these ways, when the seeding of grass comes it is encouraged to good growth, but it does not make that compact old sod 116 whiob is the delight of the farmer who de- pends on grazing for their profits. President HoprMAu.— rMy experience on such lands as the Secretary has saidjeads me to recommend that sod be plowed in the fall and the manure then spreaOj if there is to he corn planted in the spring. If there is a lack of time the manure may be drawn on any time in the winter. When spring comes harrow the ground thoroughly, by which the manure is intermixed with the soil. This will bring corn and weeds too if the seeds are in the manurej bat cultiytition will destroy them. The time to draw manure is when you have it. I am not one of those who be- lieve in saving manure to draw when it is to be immediately used. I do not credit the theory that it will lose by washing on any soils of ordinary porosity. It is true that on soils already occupied by as much water as they can hold there can be no absorption of the juices of the manure. But such places should not be manured until the surplus water is first drawn off. I would not plow in manure even under a thin sod. The proper place to apply it is on the surface, when it is ready to draw upon as soon as the young roots feel the need. On gravelly soil I would not plow in the fall and would therefore wait until spring before applying manure for corn. For such uses it will do to save manure until spring, but on other situations I should not be hindered from drawing in the fall or winter, by any fear of washing, even if the snow were a foot deep when the manure is spread and the field be hillside ; unless it be too steep to till. And even on grass land used as a top dressing there need be no fear of washing if the soil is reasonably dry. I should spread as fast as drawn, and in such condition the soakage will pass into the soil to benefit the crop. W. A. Akmsteong — My work in this line is all done for the season. The manure lies spread on the meadow, but I have been que- rying if it would not be well to harrow it well now, even at the risk of tearing up raw soil. I think such a course would promote absorption of the liquid soaking from the fall rains and the melting snows of spring, and if there should be need, a sprinkle of grass seed would be likely to take root. President Hoffman— Yes, harrow now with a Thomas smoothing harrow, which •will tear the lumps to pieces without tearing the sod much. A common drag would only knock the lumps about and would do much more injury to the sod. Mr. Seelt Chapman — What time would the Secretary recommend as the best in which to apply the manure ? Mr. Aemstbong — Now, in advance of the fall rains, especially if it is to be put oa grass lands. Mr. Chapman — That tallies with my ex- perience, but I do not believe that such is the best use to which manure may be put on our hill lands. I would rather have one load applied as I want it than ten loads as it oft- en is. There would be more good results visible from the one load, as I would use it, than from the ten loads as I have seen them used. The waste comes when the manure is drawn on moist hillsides while the ground is frozen — perhaps on snow which floats the manure off as it melts, leaving only the coarse refuse. I speak from observations made in a neighbor's field, where every day in winter the manure from his stables is drawn. I have seen it float oS, and I have seen the water in the gutters by the road- side which take the soakage from the field, richly colored by the manure. Could that be without loss of its best properties ? And besides I have noticed that there was very little improvement to the grass upon which the manure was spread, as compared with other portions of the field on which there was no application. The method is to put manure on newly plowed ground, and if it be in the fall, for wheat, I think it is the very best way be- cause it makes a good crop almosut sre and aids very much the seeding of grass which is to follow. But even when it is left until spring lying in the yard and then put on af- ter the ground is plowed for corn, or oats, or barley it is sure to tell. Mr. David Stbatton — Two years ago I drew manure on sod and saw no benefit from it. Last December I plowed part of a field in sod, for corn, and drew manure upon it. The remainder was plowed in the spring just 117 before planting, and no manure used. The difference between the portions was very much in favor of the manured part. President Hoffman — Might it not be owing somewhat to fall plowing ? Mr. Stbatton — It might be, but I think mainly to the manure. Ml'. A. D. Mills — I have drawn manure on grass lands more or less for many years, and I faila'.ways to see as good results as when it is put on the raw earth. I am sure that on our tight clay sods there is a good deal wasted by washing.especially if there is much slope to the field. In one instance when I drew on sod and put the manure in heaps, the water which ran by from melting snows was deeply colored after it reached the road, thirty rods distant. It would be difficult to persuade me there was no loss. It is true the good effects of top dressing meadows are some- times so plainly conspicuous that it seems almost certain it is the right way to do. I have had a crop of grass doubled by such top dressing, but there is too much uncertainty — too much (depends on the season. If it be dry there is but little good to come from the manure, and if it be very wet too much of it is washed away. On the whole I conclude the safest way is to put it on newly plowed land where it can be slightly mixed with the soil. I have drawn on land fall plowed for oatSj and spread it evenly, and in the same field left in heaps until spring and then spread just before sowing to oats. No differ- ence was discernable in the crop on these differently treated portions, but all were bet- ter than a part of the field on which no man- ure was put. If I were to offer advice about the proper application of manures on our tight hill lands, I should say put it always on the raw soil. As a rule I think one load so used will show more good results than five loads put on sod or plowed in. President Hoffman — Here is our friend Geo, McCann who sometimes argues iu favor of plowing in. W. A. Aemstkong — That is' ths way he getstwo hundred and twelve bushels of ears of corn to the acre,but it is unfortunate that so good a crop o^ coin could not have a lit- tle fertility from the fifty loads of manure used to make it, to help the grovth of the next crop, as Mr. McCann insists it has not, I suppose because he charges the manure all to the corn crop. Mr. McCann — I happen to think just now of a little story. Eiding by the Secretary's corn field my attention was called by a man who was with me to his estimate of average production made in the discussion last spring, when the Secretary would not be- lieve thirty-five bushels to the acre was a full average. The man said : "Look over there," pointing to the Secretary's corn. "Do you think that will average thirty-five bushels ? Stalks and ears together wouldn't make it ; it might though if you take in the grass." President Hoffman — The question of the application of manures depends very much on the object sought. On these hill lands many of the farmers make hay to sell, and reasoning from "that stand point they are right about applving manure to the ground for the crops which precede the grass, because thereby they get a, good growth of coarse timothy, which pleases the purchasers. Good, bright, coarse timothy is regarded by city buyers as the perfection of hay, and farmers who supply their wants do well to produce what sells best. When their lands fail to bring such, a quality of grass, very properly they break xip and underseed. But if these farmers want to feed their own cows for milk or even to feed steers, such hay is not the best. Quality, then, is better than bulk. All agree that the pasture on the old sod is more valuable whether to make milk or flesh than the pasture of newly seeded fields. If this be true, does it not fol- low that there is the same difference in the hay made of these grasses ? And if we are to get permanent old sod, how can it be gained without the application of manure to the sod ? Even admit there is is waste — the object when attained justifies all. I believe that for my use in producing milk or for Mr. McCann in feeding steers, one ton of fine grasses cut from a. well set old sod is worth fully one and a half tons of coarser growth cut from newly seeded meadow. Certainly if we are to manure 118 laud tlie ways here recommended' are right — put it on the raw surface, but if we are to manure the meadows there is no way but to put it on the surface. On much of my land I can not establish permanent grass even by such manuring, be- cause the soil is too open. But on the hill lands I do not doubt that a firm sod niay be secured by top dressing, and I shall continue to recommend the practice to all who want to feed up their own products. On the hill land whore Mr. McCanu has so long fattened steers there is a sod which is worth more for the purpose than the best pasture he could produce on the gravelly flat. I venture to say he could not be persuaded to have it plowed. We do not plow land to enrich it. There are many who plow and sow grain and apply manure to bring about the con- dition suitable for re-seeding with grass. If the object sought is to enrich the soil, clover is cheaper and effective as manure, taking into account the diminished cost of the la- bor required and the other fact that not enough manure can be made to spread over all the fields. So much has been said about the wash of manure on hillsides that I am persuaded to narrate my observations in my own fields. I have no land as steep as the fields of some of the speakers, but I have one place where I have spread manure on the grass with the surface inclined on about one foot in four, horizontal measure. The soil is loam and clay. Last spring I watched the eifects of the rains, and while the grass was improved wherever the manure was put, I am confi- dent that six feet down the slope from the termination of the manure, as spread, there was no visible effect. Mr. Mills. — I do not think the virtue of manure is often all washed away, but on very tight soils much of it passes off wasted. Of course there is less waste on porous soils — perhaps there is none. Land in good grass will keep so even without manure, if not grazed too close, but break that sod up and raise two or three crops of oats or other grain and it will be very difficult to get a sound sod again. There is a farm in the east part of this town where the meadows have been unbroken for, forty years and the grass continues good. Portions of that old sod have been plowed and cropped with grain, and all efforts to re-establish per- manent sod, have been unavailing. Mr. HoTCHKiN. — I want to ask President Hoffman if when he looks forward to the pos- sibly not distant future, with his lands greatly increased iu value by the encroach- ments of the city, it will not be more profit- able to pursue a different system of feeding ? Will he not find it more profitable to take his cows off from the grass where their feet tramp down and destroy twice as much as is needed for their sustenance ? Will not soil- ing become with him a necessity ? By this system permanent meadow can be saved in good condition and by the better saving and application of manure the yield of grass can be greatly increased. President Hoffman. — Yes, sir. All this is worth thought. It has occupied my mind a great deal. At present lam land poor, hav- ing too much to treat by this rt ethod. A farmer does not want more than fifty or sev- enty-five acres if he is to pursue soiling. He can not handle more with profit. We are coming to this, many of our farmers are now practicing partial soiling, and I am satisfied that near our large cities farmers will be driven to adopt it fully. Mr. Owen. — This matter of grass and the use of manure to establish it, is a subject of much magnitude. I know of a field which it is alleged has been seventy years in grsss, and I am sure the owner would not permit it to be plowed for anything less than the value of the land. We mho have always been engaged in grazing, especially steers, know well the value of old pastures. And there is as much difference in favor of old sod for milk producing, as for making flesh on steers. The milk made from old pastures will bear longer transportation without souring. After further remarks by Mr. Owen on the benefit to be derived from soiling, Mr. Doo- little narrated his experience in surface ap- plications of manure in the past season, when the cifeots were notably good to the grain crop on which it was applied, and he gave also statements of Lurprising yields of grass obtained solely by care of his 119 meadow, tte principal requisite being a good coat for winter protection, to insure which he rigidly excluded all animals after hay- ing- Next meeting will discuss "Soiling," Mr. wen being Saturday Evening, l^ov. 14, 1874. When the last meeting selected the sub- ject of Soiling for consideration at tbis meet- ing, it was alleged by some of the members that there was not enougb of practical knowledge to make the discussion valuable. This was admitted, but it was also said, "this matter of soiling is pressing upon our notice, it will soon become a necessity, and here is tbe place and now the time to con- sider it." These arguments prevailed, and there prpved to be such attraction in the subject that a fine gathering of farmers came in, most of them to listen rather than to speak, but still giving proof that real inter- est attaches to the subject. President Hoffman, after dispatching the usual routine business, called for the reading of letters received durirg the week, when several relating to Berkshire pigs were offered and passed without comment, the ideas having been presented in a recent meeting It is worthy of note, however, that the writers, although mainly all breeder^ of other stock, agreed in commending the Berk- shires. A rambling letter from 'James Miller, of Penn Tan, giving bis opinions on the appli- cation of manures and on other subjects, is - given m full so f a r as the writer confined bimself to the manure question: I have been very much interested in read- ing the report of last week's discussion upon the application of manures. I am a firm believer in top dressing. My observation and practice have cbnvinced me that to se- cure the greatest benefit from the use of manure it must be applied upon the surface, and that the soil to which it is given must be in a porous condition. If the field be de- signed for wheat the manure should be well rotted. There have been times when I have spread manure upon portions of fields just before drilling in the seed, and the benefits have been clearly discovered as soon ais the plants appeared, all the advantages being conspicuous until the harvest, when the ma- nured portions have given twice the yield of the unmanured, and in the seeding of grass to follow the wheat, like improvement has shown for at least two succeeding seasons. The most notable instance of this occurred in my fields about a dozen years ago, since which time I have made frequent experi- ments in the same way, which have uniform- ly resulted in great improvement, both to the wheat and the grass. I do not exagger- ate when I say that sometimes the crop of wheat so stimulated has been three times as great as on the portions not manured, and that the grass for two seasons thereafter has exhibited a like ratio of improvement. In some of^these cases the product of wheat has been fully fifty bushels to the acre. "I think I have learned that grass lands do not receive the real benefit of manure unless it be applied within the first two years after the seeding. After that there have been instances in my experience when the application has seemed to be entirely lost. I regard this subject of the application of manure as one of the most important for farmers to consider and should be glad if I could meet with you some time when it is up for discussion." After the reading of the letter. President ' Hoffman said : "The theme is worthy of a great deal of thought, but this meeting hav- ing the subject of soiling to consider, will not have time to take up other, matter. We are too ignorant in all our business, and es- pecially in soiling, which, with us, is almost untried. Since there are none of us who can speak from an extended experience, latitude will be given in the hope that valuable sug- gestions will be made, leading to more com- plete knowledge of this important ma.tter. Of course so far as practical speakers will confirm themselves to observed facts. Mr. Owen having been designated to present the subject will, I trust, be able to give us all instruction." Mr. Owen — At the last meeting some one remarked that we knew so little of soiling that we could not give it profitable discus- 120 sion. ■ It is none the less true tliat through, the consideration given to the matter the road to knowledge may be obtained. We must begin somewhere and in this case it seems at the beginning. For myself I have to say the President has seemed desirous to start at the beginning, in naming one who has so little practical knowledge, to lead off the discussion. My experience has been only the common one with sowed corn for feeding cows in the season of short pasture. This I have had for many years, and its use has seemed to be attended by good results. I de not care to speak now o£ the different ways of raising it, because I have a more interesting matter, to present. It is a letter from Samuel Gillett, of Genesee county, as follows : "In regard to soiling stock I cannot nar- rate as favorable results as some others re- port who claim to make the produce of one acre keep a cow one year. With me it takes about two acres. I have, after deducting woodland, roads and yards, fifty acres, and keep an average of about twenty cows and four horses, or about equal to twenty-five cows, fed for making milk. The crops grown this year have been about as foUows : Thir- teen acres in meadow, eleven in wheat, seven in oats, four in potatoes, four in corn, three in sowed or fodder corn, one in oats and peas sowed together, one in sugar beets, and six in pasture. The pasture is not turned in until it gets a good start in the spring, say absut the 28th of May. It keeps the cows until the clover is .large enough to cut, which is fed until the crop is cut for hay, when the oats and peas are used until ripe enough to cut for crop, when the land mowed for hay will keep for two or three weeks after which we depend on sowed corn and beet tops to finish out with until winter. I milk in the stable and feed grain of dome kind every day in the year. I buy brewer's grains and bran and damaged or stained beans for feed, in addition to what I raise. I do not know the amount of money paid for feed, but am satisfied that after supplying my family with bread and mostly with meat from the farm, I sell from it, besides milk, more than I buy. "I am very sure my land is growing richer and more productive every year with its present management, and hope in a few years to make a better showing." This is the statement of a farmer who is able to keep one cow on the products of two acres of land, which is much better than any one can do by the ordinary system of pastur- ing. Tears ago, in Orange county, I began raising sowed corn for soiling, by a method which practice has proved is not the best. I sowed, on one occasion, six acres broad- cast, and to get it thick enough I sowed twice, the second sowing crosswise. It would have been better in drills, for that permits cultivation by the plow, and of course the destruction of weeds, thus im- proving both the growth and the quality of the crop. The feed is also more easily gathered for use. But few of our farmers have read "Quincy on Soiling," and I may therfore be per- mitted to present ideas gathered from this work. In talking of the advantages to be derived from this system of feeding, he enumerates six heads in the order : First, saving of land ; or the investment of money having in view the keeping of a given number of animals. Thus as we have seen in the letter of Mr. Gillett twenty-five cows are kept on fifty acres by soiling, while we all know that twjloe as many acres are generally required in the ordinary way of feeding. There are men who claim that every acre properly brought into service will serve to keep a cow. But with the facts we have, all will admit, that the system does tend to a large reduction in the amount of land re- quired, and this is a strong argument in its favor. The second advantage named by Quincy is in the saving of fences. Let any of us es- timate the amount required on a farm of one hundred and sixty acres divided into ten acre fields (and this is about the usual size on such farms) making sixteen fields. With- out taking any account of extra fences for small lots set off for special purposes, nor for road fences, nor for any irregularities by which the length of fencing is increased, there will be required nine hundred and sixty rods. I think it will be admitted that the annual cost of maintaining this, including 121 first cost, necessary repairs, and rebuilding when Occasion requires, which extended over a term of years, will reach at least one hun- dred and fifty dollars. Now this sum would serve to pay one man through the period for soiling, thus disposing of the usual-objection that the cost of labor renders the system im- practicable. I believe the figures given as the cost of maintaining the fences are low, and yet at the low estimate of annual cost, so far as expense is concerned, the farmer will find that the extra labor involved in soiling is fully compensated by exemption from the other tax of fences. But this is not all. The removal of fences makes better and cleaner culture possible and is in itself an actual saving in land, giving material ad- ditions to the area available for use, as well as better access to the different portions of the farm with these artificial obstructions removed. The third benefit is found in the greater economy of food. It is qiiite plain to us all that there is great waste in the common mode of feeding. I need only mention the losses resulting from causes apparent to ev- ery observer : The tread of the animals' feet in their necessary and unnecessary travel over the pastures — the solid and the liquid excrements dropped at random, and render- ing the grass unpalatable — making it un- mitigated waste — and the spoiling of other fresh pastures by the lying down of the cat- tle when they are filled, making those spots unpalatable. These and other ways of loss make it necessary to provide vast areas of land for pasture beyond what is needed to to afford sustenance to the cattle. I shall not stop to make deductions. I give you only my opinion when I say that the losses from these causes on an average stock farm are quite sufficient, if saved, to pay the extra labor required by soiling. The fourth advantage is in the greater comfort and thrift of the cattle. It is easy to see that many of the annoyances which cattle suffer when at pasture would be avoid- ed by feeding in stables. Certainly the torments of files would be much less and the comfort of shade would be always afforded. It has been urged by the opponents of .the systeni that health is promoted by the exercise which cattle take in their search for pasture' I cannot say the argument is without weight, but I answer that soiling does not contemplate constant confinement. Arrangements are made for proper exercise, and I believe very little of this will meet all the requirements of perfect and continued good health. Cattle at pasture roam ufinec- essarily and often uneasily, witbout a pur- pose, and with no beneficial results. With every want of food and drink provided in the stable, there cannot be need of extended exercise. The fifth advantage in considering the soiling of cows, to which Quincy gave most of his care, is the increased product of milk. I am not prepared to say how much this may weigh in favor of soiling, but I have no doubt that an important increase might be thus secured. Full feed, quiet and com- fort prouote the secretion of milk. It is reasonable to suppose that the good care and watchfulness which should always be given to animals in the immediate chaxge of a sensible keeper, would tend to the attain- ment of this result. But the sixth advantage is so obviovs that it scarcely needs comment. It is the vast increase in the available supply of manure. By the common . mode of pasturing it is al- most safe to say that the manure made dur- ing the summer is lost. Dropped anywhere, exposed to the burning heat of the sun or the washings of rain, or on places where the waste is total even if the virtues were not burned nor washed out, it certainly does not conduce much to the enriching of the fields. We count for use only the accumulation of winter, for it is all that can be made avail- able. But it is of no more value than that which is made in summer, if that could be only served for use, as by this system of soil- ing it must be. I have thus presented some of the plainer ad vantages which soiling promises. They are certainly worth our consideration. I do not claim m what I have said originality. In common with many of you I am in pursuit of farther knowledge regarding this matter, for I see that there is a growing need on these high-priced lands of some more suc- cessful way of feeding than that which has descended to us from those who occupied the land when it was new. At the last meeting 122 you, Mr. President, stated as an objsotion to I would see less fence than on the drive entering upon this economy, that you were | from here to Horseheads, six miles. "land poor." That means too much land to be subject to this treatment. There are many of us in like condition. Would it not be true economy to reduce by sales the num- ber -of acres, if we can be assured of undi- minished products on what is retained f All tl e arguments are in favor of such a step. On a large farm the undertaking would be very great involving great ovitlays for' labor, but I firmly believe that the profit attending it would be ample reward for all the increase of cost. Mr. HoTCHKiN — If, Mr. Presidsnt, I might claim indulgence, I could speak of what I have seen of the practical working of this system of feeding. I have no knowl- edge beyond that acquired by observation, and the study of the benefits as illustrated in a great extent of country where soiling is the established rule. I have seen hundreds of miles of farm lands where all the cattle were fed continually in stables. Of course I refer to another country, to observations made in Europe. It must be evident to any one who gives the matter but cursory exam- ination, that our farming is in a transition state. This valley is passing from new to old, and rapidly too. What might have been commended as the wisest practice a generation ago, or even but a, dozen years since, may not now be applicable to the changed situation. The practices and modes which prevail in countries widely separated must necessarily differ because there are dif- ferent objects and requirements as well as different capabilities. But from such coun- tries useful hints may be drawn. In South- ern Europe, and especially in the South of Prance, the products differ widely from ours, and therefore the lessons of travel are scarcely applicable to our agriculture, but passing into the province of Burgundy or Normandy the climate and the products are not so essentially different from ours that the study of their practices may not be of service to us. If you were to go there you would note the entire absence of fences. You might pass over the usual routes of travel from the Mediterranean to the Eng- lish channel, and in the entire trip you Another matter which would attract ob- servation is that all the land is in some way utilized. Along the highways trees are planted, but there are no fences to mark the boundaries. The whole country has the impress of this system of soiling which is in its agriculture obedience to the scriptural injunction, "Gather up the fragments, that there be nothing wasted." In passing from the road to a farmer's house, you notice as a conspicuous object, an enclosure for cattle, scarcely ever more than an acre in extent — often much less. In the middle of that is the soiling house, with low gables and high pitched roof. At the ends suitable entrances are provided, and near by is the well. With- in and about the building all the necessary provisions are made for feeding the cattle and for saving tue manure, even the urine having a tank provided for its reception, whence it is pumped on the solid manure to aid in its preparation for use, or is drawn in casks, something like our street sprinklers, and applied directly to the meadows. With- in these soiling houses, or within the enclo- sures which surround them, cattle are kept all the time, nearly all the year. If they are ever suffered to graze they are tethered by a rope, one end of which is secured to a stake driven for the purpose, so that they cannot move beyond the narrow circle measured by the rope. There is much uniformity in the appearance of the soiling bouses, and in all the arrangements for feeding and otherwise attending to the wants of the cattle. In a, country divested of fences, as might be ex- pected, there is very clean culture and every evidence of very careful farming. Weeds are eradicated to make room for useful plants. What we speak of here as so very desira- ble — permanent meadow land — is attained there through soiling. Meadows abound, unbroken for a life time. Of course excel- lence and permanence are secured by the application of the vast supplies of manure, all saved in the soiling houses ready to use when occasion demands. The man in charge goes out to the grass and cuts what he wants, which is drawn by a donkey to the cattle. It is true there are specialties in 123 farming there, as here, but the description I have given is applicable to large districts of the country. Near large cities especial at- tention is given to the production of milk and butter, while farther back in the country the varied interests of agriculture all receive attention, but everywhere the one mode of feeding cattle prevails, whether the chief object be gain or dairy products or crops of any kind. There are fields of flax, the extent of which would surprise an observer from this country if he did not reflect that those fields produce flax from which is made the linen for the world. Vast amounts of lime are used for mechanical purposes and to fer- tilize the land. On the subject of soiling, if I should not weary your patience, I would present the views of a man who has adopted the practice — a gentleman who has attained literary fame and who is also successful as a farmer. His farm embraces two hundred acres, two miles from New Haven, Connecticut. It has a face much like President Hoffman's farm, but it is not so good in soil. Sir years of occupancy under the system of soiling pro- duced great improvements. I read : "From the eighty-acre flat beloif — so like a carpet, with its checkered growth — I order every line of division fence to be removed ; the best of the material being? kept in reserve for making good the border fences, and the remainder cut, split and piled for the fire. The neighbors who cling to the old system of two acre lots and pinched door yards,open their eyes and mouths very widely at this. The novelty, like all novelties in a quiet country regiop, is at once astounding and oppressive — as if the parish parson were suddenly to come out in the red stockings of a cardinal, or a sober-sided select-man to appear on the highway without some impor- tant article of his dress. I fancy two or three astute old gentlemen leaning over the border fence as the work of demolition goes on. "The Squire's makiu' this ere farm inter a parade ground, a'n't he ?'' says one ; and there is a little, withering, sarcastic laugh of approval. Presently another is charged with a reflec- tion which he submits in this shape : "Ef a critter breaks loose in such a rounge as that I raether guess he'll have a time on't." And there is another chirrupy laugh, and s-gnifl- cant noddings are passed back and forth be- tween the astute old gentlemen — as if they were mandarin images, and nodded by rea- son of the gravity of some concealed dead weight — (as indeed they do.) A third suggests that "there woant be no great expense for diggin' o' post holes," which remark is so obviously sound, that it is passed by in silence. The clearance, however, goes forward - swimmingly. The new breadth which seems given to the land as the dwarfish fields dis- appear one after another, develops a beauty of its own. The yellow -weeds and withered wild grass which had clung under the shel- ter of the fences, even with the best care are all shorn away. The tortuous and irregular lines which the frosts had given to the reel- ings platoons of rails, perplex the eye no more. Near to the centre of these opened fields is a great feeding shed, one hundred feet by forty, its ridge high, and the roof sloping away in swift pitch on either side to lines of posts, rising eight feet only from the ground. The gables are covered in with rough mate- rial, in such shape as to leave three simple open arches at either end ; the middle open- ing — high and broad, so that loaded teams may pass beneath ; the two flanking arches — lower, and opening upon two ranges of stalls which sweep down on either side of the building. These stalls are so disposed that the cattle are fed directly from carts passing around the exterior. Behind either range of cattle is a walk five feet broad ; and between these walks, an open space sixteen feet wide, traversing the whole length of the building, and serving at once as a manure pit, and gangway for the teams which de- posit from time to time their contributions of muck and turf. Midway of this central area is a covered cistern., from which, as oc- casion demands, the drainage of the stalls may be pumped up to drench the accumula- ting stock of fertilizing material. This simple building, which serves as the , summer quarters of the dairy, is picturesque in its outline; for I know no reason why 124 economy should abjure grace, or why farm construction should be uncouth or tawdry. A small pasture-close, with strong fencing — with gates that will not swag, and with abundance of running water, supplied from the hills, serves as an exercisin g ground for the cows for two hours each day. Other times, throughout the growing season, they belong in the open and airy stalls. The crops which are to feed them, are pushing luxuriantly within a stone's throw of their quarters. An active man with a sharp scythe.a light horse-cart and Canadian pony, will look after the feeding of a herd of fifty, \tith time to spare for milking and stall cleaning. From the tenth of May to the first of June, perhaps nothing will contribute so much to a full flow of milk, as the fresh- springing grass upon some outlying pasture on the hills. After this, the cows may take up their regular summer quarters in the building I have roughly indicated. Prom the first to the tenth of June, there may be heavy cuttings of winter rye ; from the tenth of June to the twentieth, the lucerne (than which no better soiling crop can be found) is in full season ; after the twentieth. clover and orchard grass are in their best condition, and retain their succulence up to the first week in July, when, in ordinary ' seasons, the main reliance — maize which was sown in mid- April, is fit for the scythe. Succeeding crops of this, keep the mangers of the cows full, up to an early week in October. Afterwards may come cuttings of late sown barley, or the leaves of the Mangel, or carrot tops, with which, as a bonne houche, the cattle are withdrawn to their winter quarters, for their dietary of cut-feed, oil-cake, occasional bran and roots. They leave behind them in their summer banqueting house, a little Ehigiof fertilizing material — not exposed to storm^, neither too dry nor too moist, and an unctuous fatness, which will make sundry surrounding fields, in the next season, carry a heavier burden than ever of purple Mangel, or of shining maize leaves. I perceive, too, very clearly, in further- ance of the illustration, that one acre will produce as much nutritive food, under this system, as four acres under the old plan of waste — by poaching — and by exposure of aU manurial to the fierce heat of the sun, and to the washings of rain storms. I perceive that the land, as well as the cattle, are all fairly in hand, and better under control. If at any time the season, or the market, should indi- cate a demand for some special crop, I am not disturbed by any apprehension that this or that enclosure may be needed for grazing, and so, bar the use. 1 perceive that a well regulated system must govern all the farm labor, and that there will be no place for that looseness of method, and carelessness about times and details, which is invited by the old wfiy of turning cattle abroad to shirk for themselves. No timid team will be thrashed, in order to wipe the fence posts with the clattering whiffletree, at the last bout around the head, lands. There will be no worrying of the Buckeye in old and weedy corners; not a weed nor a Golden-rod can wave anywhere in triumph. The eye sweeps over one stretch of luxuriant field, where no foot of soil is wasted. The crops, in L ug even lines, are marked only by the successive stages of their growth, and by their coloring. There are no crooked rows, no gores, no gatherings. If the reader has ever chanced to sail upon a summer's day up the river Seine, he will surely remember the beautiful checker- work of crops, which shine, in lustrous green, on either bank beyond the old Nor- man city of Eouen. Before yet the quaint and gorgeous towers of the town have gone down in the distance, these newer beauties of the cleanly cultivated shore-land chal- lenge his wonder and admiration. I name the scene now, because it shows a cultiva- tion without enclosures ; nothing but a traditional line — whi^^h some aged poplar, or scar on the chalk cliff marks, — between ad- joining proprietors ; a belt of wheat is fringed with long-bearded barley', and next the plume-like tufts of the French trefoil, make a glowing band of crimson. A sturdy peasant woman, in wooden sabots, is gather- ing up a bundle of the trefoil to carry to ner pet cow, under the lee of the stone cottage that nestles by the river bank. And I indulge my fancy with the idea of some weazen-faced New England farmer 125 looking down upon all this from some shat- tered loop-hole of the wrecked chateau Gaillard, and saying— " Gosh, ef a critter were to break loose, I guess they'd have a time on't." There are some things we New England farmers have not learned yet. I trust, Mr. President, that if you and I live out the allotted "three score and ten years we shall witness the great change pro- duced by this system on your own farm long before you find it necessary to order your ascension robes ! President Hoetman — With such a show- ing I am constrained to ss,y there is certain- ly something in soiling which claims our at- tention. I think I have stated here on an- other occasion what was told me by a friend m Orange county, who gave it a trial for one year. He had one hundred acres of very rich land. I visited him a year after the trial, and desirous to obtain information, I asked him why he did not continue soifing. He answered : "There are two objections. One is, I got too much milk.'' I thought it a singular objection, but it was partly ex^ plained by the fact that in the year of his trial milk in New York was low and the cart- age consumed all the profit, so that the more he handled the worse for him. I want- ed the other objection and was surprised to hear him say, — "It makes too much man- ure." This he explained by saying that his rich land had no need of such expensive dressing as soiling gave, and he got "sick and tired of drawing manure." He ex- pressed the belief that he could by proper attention to bis forage crops, easily keep a cow to every acre of his land. He be- lieved that the grass, by this system, could be so improved in quality that when made into hay, there would be less need of m^al than with ordinary hay. We are educated to the ways adopted by those who preceded us. We are creatures of habit. It is this which makes us look up- on any radical change with distrust. To us it would seem funny to have the cattle care- fully shut up while luxuriant pastures were close in sight. It is a shook to habit and nothing more. All of us do more or less of soiling, and some of us must adopt it fully soon. Sowed corn, probably one of the poorest of soiling crops, is nearly our sole venture, and all agree that there is profit in using it. For the successful practice of full soil- ing there is needed a year of preparation and a succession of crops that will afford at all seasons good and abundant food. I should re- commend for this purpose the cultivation of cabbage, for I believe a given area will pro- duce far move nutriment in cabbage than in sowed corn, and it is not susceptible to injury by heavy frosts, which would destroy the corn. First in order I would sow rye in August, to be cut for feed abo^it the middle of next May. The ground should be thor- oughly enriched to insure a good growth. — After the rye, greeu oats and then sowed corn, and after that cabbage with beet and turnip tops. But with both the cabbage and the turnip tops there should be given feeds of meal, that no bad flavor be imparted to the milk. Corn meal and bran mixed would be better than meal alone. On all these feeds, with clover and grass cut in season, the season from spring to winter can be safely passed. Several other speakers, including Messrs. Geo. Harris, Geo. McCann, J. F. Beecher, Geo. Oongdou and Carmy Compton, contin- ued the subject. Mr. Congdon related an experience with rye out as green food. A crop'upon which he commenced early gave thi'ee cuttings, which was a matter of sur- prise to some of the members, but was auth- enticated by the experience of others. Mr. Compton narrated an experience covering a considerable part of the past season, in which the results were so very favorable that he intends to adopt the full practice as soon as the necessary arrangements for a proper suc- cession of crops and for the feeding can be made. On the whole the Club has never before exhibited so much interest in soiling. It is now almost assured that extensive prepara- tions will be made by many of the mem,bers for a full adoption of the system within the next season. "Farm Accounts' next meeting. will be discussed by the 126 Satubday Evening, Nov. 21, 1874. Many of the members who are usually in their places were absent from this meeting for causes which served as valid excuses. President Hoffman was detained at home by ill health. Mr: John Bridgmau was assigned to his place. The thin attendance might be explained on the theory that the subject for discussion was distasteful to the absentees. Pr.rm accounts seem to be regarded as intri- cate ana puzzling problems, quite beyond the requirements of most plain farmers, who are content to invest their money and toil and care through years burdened with earnest effort, and no where a landing place for observation. Mr. Hakeison, of Grand Eapids, engaged the attention of the Club for a few minutes after the opening, in a description of a neat, and strong farm wagon, for which he acts as s-lesman. After affording adequate gviaran- tees for all the excellence claimed, the chief point in his speech was the exceedingly low price for the wagons put down, freight paid in Elmira. He objected to giving the offer the publicity which would be inevitable if it were incorporated in the report of the pro- ceedings because he did not propose to keep his offer open for any considerable time. He, however, authorized the Secretary to com- municate the price with his references, to any farmer desiring to purchase within a few days. These will be furnished on applica- tion, meantime it is but fair to say that the Club considered his propositions well worthy of consideration, and with one accord pro- nounced his offers very favorable to those who desire to become purchasers. Less than the usual list of wants was re- ported, the chief one being five hundred bushels of nice clean oats by Farmer Cong- don, who is well known as a liberal buyer, looking more to the quality of his purchases than to price. Ihese matters being over, Mr. Bridgman in the chair said ; "Faj'm accounts has been selected for discussion, and it is uufortunate that so few of our farmers are hero to ex- press their opinions on soimportant a matter. Any who are present can have freedom of speech on the subject." W. A. AkmS'ironq — When one reflects that agriculture in this country is abusineas which employs more capital than all other kinds of industry — that its products are an- nually greater in value than the aggregate of all manufactox'ies, and of mining, and of public improvements for the same period, it is surprising that it cannot present more ac- curate statistics of cost. Even the estimates of production are from the necessities of the case, but little better than conjecture be- cause there is everywhere such neglect of figures that positive knowledge is impossi- ble. For this reason prices are but arbi- trary resolves of a few men in position to operate for profit in the well earned fruits of the farmer's labor. Even the government, through its agricultural bureau, can only approximate the truth regarding the amount of crops, with not even a guess at the cost. There is no method by which these facts of vital importance can be made to appear un- der the present careless disregard of records by farmers themselves. The year opens, with labor in which they actively engage, and as each succeeding month comes with its tasks they are met with muscle, but the lightening processes which come through intelligence are neglected, so that with the close of the year the lessons of experience are utterly lost, except so far as the treach- erous memory of overworked men may have srved here and there a scrap of knowledge to direct future efforts. There is a common complaint that "fenc- cing does not pay.'' That is a guess of tired men. Ask them for a statement which shall prove the expression and how many can give it ? Ask how much is the cost of producing a bushel of oats, or of wheat, or a pound of butter, and if any answer comes, it is a guess sustained by no record of' facts — a mere gen- eral estimate of the chief items of cost and a rounding off with a jump as though tha query were anomalous, and in no" sense worthy of consideration. "What right have men to say that "farming does not pay," un- less they can bring some proof of the asser- tion other than dicta ? Pressed closely these men sometimes reluctlantly admit that by the rise of land they do receive profit, but that is the only source of gain to Ahe farmer. How absurd ! If the farmer has not im- proved his land while it has advanced in 127 value from fifty dollars per acre to one hun- dred dollars, how can he produce his grain more cheaply after the advance ? And if he can not produce more cheaply how is the profit of farming greater ? The truth is the advance of land is no profit whatever until sales are made, and instead of cheapening products they are made dearer, hecause taxes are greater. Of course this supposes that the advance is due to other causes than in- creased capacity for production. And it is likewise true that farming- does not pay in spite of the asseverated objection. But there is proof that it does efford profit, in the gene- ral and continued prosperity of the country for we are not distinctively a commercial nor a manufarturing people. If we could have a full and acourrate un- derstanding of the amount of agricultural productions of any given year, with the fig- ures which represent their cost, there would he the basis of intelligent farming. We should know what crops have too much at- tention and what too little. We should know wherein profit lay in each particular locality and how to apply labor to its best uses. We should kmwj what oar crops are worth rather than what they will bring, and we should know whether it would be better to work them into finished products or to put them raw upon the markets. All this would come with the careful keeping of farm accounts about which there need be no difficulty if the effort were made with any- thing like such determination, as the farmer carries to the execution of hea.vier tasks. It would be an insult to the intelligence of the Club to question the ability to keep such records. Whoever is unfit to do it is unfit to be a farmer. The inclination is all that is lacking. With that it would be just as easy to say what a bushel of oats, from any given crop, has cost as for the President to name the cost of a quart of milk — a branch of knowledge in which he is more deficient. Let us see how much is necessary. A record of the expense includes first the plowing.: — That is easy. Of the dragging and other necessary fitting. That is easy. The seed and the sowing — the harvesting and thresh- ing — all easy. Where is the intricacy in the problem of cost P With these records com- plete how plain a matter to divide the total cost by the number of bushels produced,and BO ascertain the cost per bushel ! Or to go farther with such records, the sum of pro- duction in all the fields of the farm will plainly show the percentage of profit on the investment. If it will please the objectors more let us admitthat such record will show the percentage of loss. If a farmer has a family he will tell you they must have support, and that he has no way to make it except from his farm. How hard that is ! Still he does not see that is rather hard on the farm to give it no credit for such support. Perhaps he could not do much better if he was planted in Wall street with the amount of capital which his farm represents, as a start in business, and in that case he would say that Wall street doesn' t pay. This matter of farm accounts has been be- fore us at other meetings, and the discussion has not borne profit. Perhaps it will not now, but let us at least hesitate to repeat the stories of losses in farming unless the fig- ures can be brought as proof. Let us teach no such lessons as that published to the world by a distinguished member of this body, who in the spring discussions gave us bis estimate of the average yield per acre of corn in this fertile valley, and appended the surprising statement that every acre of full average yield involved a loss to the producer of six dollars. Let us first inform ourselves by the facts and the figures by the record, before we out such discouragement in the way of those who might bring to our tasks more intelligence and better methods than we use. Before we talk glibly of losses let us be able to produce the records to substan- tiate his assertions. Mere guesses in farm- ing are hot much better than in other kinds of business, and good, sound and successful men in other pursuits do not rely much on guesses. With the approaching year let us hope that our members will| open and keep accounts. Mr. Owen — In my situation it would prove very difficult: to keep a strict account of all farm operations because there are so many different interests of different degrees of magnitude. I have never kept accurate 128 farm aooounts, for in the last twenty years, I have heen satisfied with the dairy system as being more productive of real profit than grain raising, and have accordingly stocked the farm with cows, depending on them for the best proceeds, and raising only such grain as seemed to be required for the prop- er employment of the fields and for the needs of the stock. Having spent so much of my life in dairy regions I do not claim to know much about the necessity of farm ac- counts in other branches of husbandry. I admit the necessity of more complete knowl- edge about the cost of dairy products, but in my situation it appears rather difficult to obtain such information so we continue along doing the best we can in the absence of figures and possibly with nearly as good results. Still there is the necessity. We should know what our products cost that we might better know how to sell. By carry- ing through a course of years a system of accounts by which we shall arrive at the cost of production, there would como precise knowledge about the proper course to pur- sue. We should learn what crops produce profit and what are attended with loss. In some cases we should fortify belief while in others our theories would no doubt be upset. I have always entertained an opinion that as a grain crop, corn brings with us in this val- ley, the most profit, a. principal argument in proof being that the stalks do so much for the winter keeping of cows. But I cannot say what is the average cost of a, bushel of fiorn, although it would be difficult to per-; suade me that a fair crop is attended with loss. Mr. Bbidgman— Can you tell us the "cost of the field reported here some time ago, in which one acre gave two hundred and forty bushels of ears ? You will remember the cost was then asked. Mr. Owen — The husking was not then fin- ished, but it is now. Tlie field was twelve acres. The whole cost was one hundred and forty-five' dollars and forty-five cents, or twelve dollars and twelve cents per acre. The items which entered into the cost and their proportions were : Plowing ten days, at .So $ 30 00 Dragging three days, §3 9 00 Marking (one horse) 2 00 Planting, five days, ,$1.50 7 50 Hoeing, twenty-five, .51.50 37 50 Cultivating and plastering 27 50 Plaster, 1,400 lbs., say 5 50 Seed, three bushels, say 2 45 Cutting 24 00 $145 45 This is the cost of the crop before husk- ing, and of course all will agree that the stalks much more than pay for the husking, but as I have not a report of that item of cost, it will not quite make up the cost of the grain and the stalks separately. One of the chief difficulties in keeping farm accounts is in the cost of team work, the teams being owned and kept on the farm. In this case the price allowed tas been that at which the labor could be hired, and that is certainly enough, because that will always do the work. But if we were required to ascertain the real cost of teams kept on the farms, sometimes idle and some- times at work, but fed all the year, the prob- lem becomes difficult. In our lumber busi- ness we consider it cheaper to hire team work than to keep our own teams, so for the hauling of a million feet a year we have only one team, and that is used for odd jobs which the men who are hired dislike to undertake. But in farm work it will not do to depend on hired teams because they might not be forthcoming just at the time when needed. It is a necessity to keep the teams on the farm even if the cost be greater. I confess it has always appeared strange to me that we should know so little of cost in the business which is our life study. Per- haps it is because there has been no system of keeping farm accounts devised which has proved suited to the need. There are blanks advertised for this use, but I have not seen them. Just what we want in these days is to Jinow something more of precise results. Mr. Owen having taken his seat no one seemed willing to utter a word in favor of keeping farm accounts. Mr. Bbidgman, by a happy inspiration, called Mr. BUlings, and as happily excused him after his brief speech. Mr. Billings — I have always been so much troubled by store accounts that I resolved 129 long ago not to have farm aeoounts ! Mr. D. C. CuBTis — The necessity for keep- ing aeoounts is apparent in all kinds of busi- ness, and certainly not less in farm affairs than in other transactions. Go to any bank- er or merchant or manufacturer, and yon find that he has an ai'Ouvate i-ecord of all transactions. He can show you at the end of the year not only what has been done but the cost of doing it, and the profits or losses. This is (essential to his success, but not more so than to the proper understanding by the farmer of his business. In my business as an attorney I have often been saved great annoyance by having proper vouchers to show what otherwise might be doubted, and this necessity appears more in dealing' with farmers than with other classes, for it is so eommon for them to trust all their affairs to memory. Not long ago having made a col- lection for a farmer, he called on me for the sum, and I felt sure that it had been paid. On referring to my journal it was charged to him, but 1 did not recall the incident of pay- ment, although I could not doubt that the book was right. Taking down my checks which had passed through the bauk and been retftrned to me, I found one drawn to his order for the exact sum, endorsed by him, and of course paid. That settled the doubts and illustrates the need of careful records and vol chers in all accounts. Besides this pi-otection there is in keeping accounts that discipline which is likely to aid in all the business affairs of the farmer, lit makes him [more methodical, and so adds to his knowledge that he can be able to lopp off useless or unnecessary expenditures. It is directly conducive to success. There may perhaps be more necessity for elaborate book- keeping in bankers' and merchants' ac- counts, in the fact that they have more per- sons with whom to deal than farmers have, but to the full understinding of his business earef ul accounts are as essential to the far- aier as any mau . I have noticed that much litigation grows out of this carelessness among farmers, by which they are content to trust to memory affairs wMch should go upon record. A hired man in the fall claims more than the farmer is disposed to allow. He denies pay- ment which the farmer alleges has been made, and both having trusted to memory the accounts of the season, the disagreement leads to law, which may be profitable to me, but is certainly not to them, and there should be no necessity for resorting to it. As to the difficulty of keeping the accounts, it vanishes with the undertaking. There is no more trouble in keeping full and com- plete records of all transactions than in mak- ing a memorandum of purchases at the store and certainly every average farmer has intalligence enough to do this. A little at- tention day by day when all is fresh in mind is all that is necessary, and but very little time is needed. I apprehend that whoever undertakes any system by which such a record will be made will find the profit^so great that he will after the first year of trial never again feel able to conduct his affairs without it, and that it will year by year make hira more success- ful. Mr. Van Duzee. — I supposed this matter of farm accounts meant more particularly such records as would enable us to know the cost of crops and the profit or loss attending their production, rather than the keeping of ordinary business accounts. Having entered late, I do not know what former speakers may have said, but I have heard of a sup- posed difficulty in keeping farm accounts, on account of the intricacy of the methods. Now, it is not a serious task to make such a farm record as will show all important trans- actions and the cost of every crop . All that is needed is a daily journal in which every day the farmer should enter what has been d'one on that da.y and what it ha,s cost. He knows of course the cost of the labor which he hires, and it is as easy to set that down and as easy to put down every other item of expense. At the proper time he can enter the several items in the ledger against the crops for which the expense was~ made, and he thus has the figures to show what his business is doing ; even showing where profit is and where loss is. This is very important to his success. It leads to the lopping off of those parts of his business which do not bring profit. He shows cause. He finds 130 this record will enable him to work more intelligently. He knows the cost of plow- ing, of dragging, and of harvesting, by which he can decide where to rctrendh, if there is anywhere too much expenditure. He learns, too, to make better estimates of cost for such operations as he contempiat=s. If he has raised a field of barley and taken ac- curate account of cost aad account of sales he knows just what has been paid on his la- bor and capital. — Now as it costs more labor to put in a crop on some fields than on others he is able to estimate the probabilities of profit in other situations. On a rough or stumpy field he will make allowances by which he is prepared to decide if it is better to venture upon that field at all. And then again he learns that meadows with a small yield of grass cost too much. The mowing is just as expensive for an acre of grass that gives one half a ton as for another acre that gives two tons. So he plans the methods to bring up his meadows to a higher standard thus reducing the cost of his hay. A good result of keeping farm accounts is noticeable in the dairies which send milk to factories. I remember in the beginning of my cheese making many of my customers wanted to drop oil on the first of November, or earlier, and others wanted to milk but nee a day. My contracts were to the first of December, and I was obliged to hold them. So in the spring they wanted to be- gin in May. Now, after some years thes^ farmers having had their accounts kept for them by the factory, they want to begin as soon as I am ready or before, and they are very willing to stay until the close of the season, milking up closely twice a day, and feeding extra feed to increase quantity. Tl>e truth is they have learned where the profit comes in and have therefore changed their practices to insure the greatest pi ofit. With- out these accounts they would still be prac- ticing the old methods. They have come to learn by this system of daily accounts kept for them that even pumpkins have value, and that corn fodder is worth far more than its cost to make milk. Mr. Bkidoman — For two years I kept an accurate daily account of my receipts of . milk, and the amount distributed, as well as that sold, but the personal supervision in the milk trade proved a very burdensome task and I abandoned that method, pre- serving, however, such a system of accounts that 1 am able to know general results with such a system of accuracy that I am satis- fied. The difficulty I apprehend, in the way of keeping farm accounts, is that the farmer comes in tired and is therefore reluctant to attempt any intellectual effort. If he begins Lhese accounts there comes a season of es- pecial fatigue, and he passes the matter over for' a few days when he feels intense disyust for the task of bringing up. Habit governs us in this matters as in others. If we had always subjected ourselves to the methods required there would be no diiBoulty, but I apprehend that old farmers will be very slowly to attempt these accounts. Mr. VanDuzee — I hope I did not make the keeping of these accounts seem difficult. It is a very simple matter. A daily memor- andum of aifairs, not requiring fifteen min utes of time, will serve the purpose. So much valuable knowledge would be gained that I cannot see how farmers feel willing to dispense with these o.ccounts. They lead to direct profits. There are many who keep too many horses because they do not know the cost of keeping. There are others who do not keej) enough, a,nd so their work falls behind. These accounts show both errors as well as all the other errors of farm man- agement and they are therefore indispensa- ble in everything like intelligent farming. Having diversified interests I have neces- sarily more complex work, but I have always been able to know the cost of the cheese which I make, and of the pork and the grain products of the farm, as well as the products of my own dairy, at least, approximately. Mr. CoNGDON — It seems to me this should prove the easiest part of farming. In or- dinary mixed farming it woula require infin- itely less labor and precision than in the trade of Mr. Bridgeman. He has to take account of every small transaction, but great in number, whereas in the other case a brief record serves for all that is done. 131 It sounds strangely to me wKen I hear so many farmers complain of poverty, and I see that they grow rioh. Not long since I was told by one of this class ttiat he was not making anything. I asked him to say what he was doing, and he enumerated sales, and concluded, "I don't make anything. You see I dont get anything like seven per cent. on my land." Well," said I, "you have some pork not counted." "Yes." "And supplies for your family, fruit and grain, and whatever you have raised." "Why, yes," said he, "bi.it you see I must have their living any way." "Of course," said I, "but don't yom see that if I had money to let at seven per aent. I would have to take out of that interest the cost of purchasing all the things for my fam- ily?" The fact was he was making no account of all the farm produced, except that which he sold. Now every merchant or banker or manufacturer supports his family fi'om the profits of his business; and the fa.rmer seems to think these things are to be taken out of his business without any allowance, whereas they should all count so far as they come from the farm, to the credit of the farm. One of the great benefits to be derived from the careful keeping of farm accounts is that it leads to careful purchases and pay- ments in cash, and therefore cheaper pur- chases. Here is a gentleman who has aome from Michigan to offer you farm wagons. — He knows exactly what they cost, and if he sells to you he will receive your cash, so, as a, means of procuring that, be <,ffers you such low rates that you are surprised. His careful accounts of the cost of construction enable him to give you the surprise, and perhaps make for him satisfactory profit. This business of dealing for cash is worthy of more notice. I met one of our townsmen once who told me what he consideied tt, laughable incident. He was good for all his orders, but he had sent to an Eastern manu- factory for a wagon, and had a prompt reply : "Dear sir, your order received. We can not send you the wagon until we iiave received the cash. We make twenty-five wagons daily, and sell them so close to the cost that there is but three dollars profit on eaeh. You will readily perceive that this margin will not permit us to take orders unaccom- panied by cash." There was in this a lesson of great force. Eeady cash makes low pur- chases. Now careful accounts lead to ready cash, and therefore to greater profits in farming. Mr. J. E. CoNELiNa — I have kept these accounts for years in mixed farming, and while the matter is practicable, I cannot say it is unattended by trouble. The greatest difficulty is to divide up time as it is applied to the many different tasks. It is very easy to keep the records of total cost and total production. Mr. CoNQDON — I would undertake to make all these entries in fifteen minutes for each day if Mr. Conkling would report to me what is done. The task is in no manner difficult. Mr. Billings — He watches his barometer and takes account of the changes. Then he hoes cabbage a little while, and weeds the beets and prunes his vines and fruit trees, and divides the day into twenty perfor- mances. Therein lies the difficulty of keep- ing farm accounts when one desires to em- brace every little affair. Saturday Evehing, Nov. 28, 1874. All the afternoon rain had fallen steadily, the only change being bigger and more fre- quent drops as the hour of meeting ap- proached. Nothing can more effectually damp the ardor of the average farmer for evening meetings than a chill November storm. The present instance conformed in all respects to the general rule. But few farmers ventured out, but there were enough to make a very interesting discussion. Du- ring the week several letters from other Clubs had been received. Generally they had conveyed a desire for information con- cerning the workings of this institution, which for years has maintained an excep- tional popularity. These letters were sub- mitted to the Club, together with the Sec- retary's replies, and were the subjects of considerable comment, in fact shaping the 132 subsequent disonssion. A general review of transactions through past years was had, members taking occasion to point out faults or remissness or the failure to profit by the lessons offered, as well as the benefits ap- parent to all who have attempted to measure the influence of the Club, and the effect of its teaching's as shown by improvements in the agriculture of the district which it rep- resents. Mindful of the sentiments uttered as criticisms or as monitory lessons. Presi- dent Hoffman said : It is plain that we do not all estimate our responsibilities properly. We come here for self-improvement, and if we attain that ob- ject something good is done, but this is not all. What we say here goes through the press to many thousands of readers, who take as deep an interest in tht.-e discussions as we do ourselves, and we are made the in- struments for shaping thought in a wide field. I believe we nave not properly con- sidered this part of our responsibility. ISfo doubt we ha.ve had direct profit through this school. Tlie evidences of improvement — of increased knowledge are every where seen in our practices. We have learned to think more fully and wisely of our business. We have learned by experiments conducted with a view to the bringing out of truth. To-night as I walked along- the streets to this meeting my mind was occupied by re- flections on the discussions had in years past. I thought I should be glad to meet here our friends McCann and Carpenter, who com- bated, and perhaps I may say ridiculed, a theory of mine put forth at one of our meet- ings. I advocated grades of Jersey, got by the use of pure bred males on our native cows, for the dairy whether for milk or but- ter. I thought I had evidence that the cows obtained by such brceiiing would have great value. These gentlemen scouted the idea that the little Jersi'vs were useful for any purpose. Tbey styled them '^lats" and "mice." They had been accustomed to feed shapely steers, noting growth, and flesh, and beauty, as measured by their stan- dard. They worked for profit, and wisely too, but they could not see where profit eould come out of this diminutive breed. Then I had no thought of breeding for my own use any of the grades, but soon after I was led to do it, and I have raised ten oi' twelve heifers in accordance with the theory I advocated. I wish my friends were here to-night to compare notes. These heifers are milking now with s;itisfaclory profit. One that aborted at six mouths is exhibiting excellent qualities for the uiilk dairy. I have mentioned this to show that we are learning through the uismissious held here in v;hich we are ■ sometimes led to test our theories, to silence opposition by proof of their soundness, or to satisfy ourselves what is truth. I was led to test this matter of grade Jerseys as milkers to satisfy niyself.oi' to put It in another way, 1 was driven to it by the opposition of members of the club who could see no excellence in the Jerseys, lacking the one requirement as they viewed it, size. Another m^lt^e^, often discussed here, in which I have had for opponents Messrs. Eockwell, Mile.*, Chapman and others, is the top-dressing- of meadows. I have been anx- ious to establish sod on my grass lands by this method, and have betn trying faithfully for years. These gentlemen siiy my prac- tice is wrong-. I confess, after years of effort, my faith is much shaken. I have tried to produce facts to show the wisdom of such use of the manure, while other men have been trying to find other facts to prove my practice wrong. Herein is a valuable means of instruction, I gather all I can of knowledge from u;;, practice and observation of the course chosen, and besides all this I hsA-e the benefit of the facts gatliered by a like course on the other side. 1 here is good in this. What we want in all our pursuits of knowledge is the hard bony fact. "X'o the- ories to be upheld as such. Let all meet the test and fall, if they must, by it, or abide only as so supported. I am reminded in this connection of a let- ter received from a Kuohesler gentlemen, a year or two ago. Hv was interested in an agrieultui-al club, and iiesi)-ed advice about the best means to in.sure usefulness and per- U!anei;cy. I replied, anything will d.. better than flowery speeches. U'hoever presents the uiosl facts, plain hard facts, is the best speaker, without much regard to his style of oratory. 133 That we have sained real profit through this club no doubt. We are constantly step- ping forward, stimulated by thought which finds expression here. As an illustration I may cite the discussion a, few weeks ago on the breeds of pigs. Growing directly out of that many purchases have been made, all of the pure breeds, selected from a wide extent of uouutry, so that the farmers of this val- ley, will be able to change the character of the swine from the common stock to the fine breeds, and if they keep their accounts, as your last meeting showed they suould be kept, they will.be able, in a few years, to inform us how much more of profit there is in these better breeds, and which one of them is best for our use. But leaving these practical applications of our teachings, I think I may say that none of "us step squarely up to duty in our atten- dance and labor here ; in view of the fact wo stand forth as educators through the press. Whether worthy or unworthy, these reports have thousands of readers who are more or less governed by the ideas presented. Doubt- less they give us credit for more wisdom than we possess. But this thought, that so many minds are, to some extent at least guided by what is said here, should make us careful to present only truth as we view it, fortifying by such facts as we can bring, ready, always, to abandon error and work by the best lights we have. Mr. Bkidgeman. — In what the President has said I fully agree. As an old member of this Club I am ready to acknowledge many valuable lessons obtained through it, and I trust it has yet a great field of useful- ness before it. The President briefly hinted that top- dressing his meadows has not met his expec- tations. This is a matter in which I am much concerned. I have thought much of the matter, etpecially for the last two years, led, as I have been to close observation, by the objections lo the mode given in the dis- cussions here within the last three or four years. I have believed that such top-dress- ing of grass lands was the best use to which I could put my supply of manure, but my faith is broken, at least so far as such dress- ing applies to the renovation of old meadows. I have had too many total failures. There have been poor, weedy spots which 1 have top-dressed very heavily with an utter ab- sence of results, if I may except a greater growth of the weeds. In many such ca-ses I have been unable to find any improvement whatever to the grass. Now I am anxious to get the manure from my stables as fast as u-ade, and I have therefore striven to find profit in this application to the meadows be- cause it is the most convenient use of it ; but I am compelled to admit that some other means, by which I may realize more of the value of the manure is my present de.'iire. I should be glad to escape the labor of hand- ling three or four times before the manure is applied to the fields, although this course seems inevitable if it is used for winter wheat, in which way I have had the best re- ttirns. I confess I do not know what is the best way to use my supply of manure after abandoning the top-dressing of the meadows, which is waste. Keeping cows being my principal business I do not desire any great breadth of grain. For the corn and root crops which I want there is no demand for more than a small portion of the manure which accumulates through the season. Two years ago I top-dressed one half of a field of winter wheat. On that portion the crop was very much better than on the oth- er half not top-dressed, and a like difference was plainly discernable in the seeJing of timothy and clover, the catch being even and strong on the former, while on the latter it was weak and spotted, large plots showing no grass at all. Must I accept the argument and go back to wheat farming ? I am satis- fied that as I have practiced there is utter waste of the great bulk of the manure. On newly seeded grass lands full benefit may be derived from the manure spread on the sur- face, but these newly seeded lands mean grain. The old sods are what I want to im- prove, and I find, after years of trial, that the method is ineffectual and involves great waste. If the President can enlighten me about some more profitable use of nauure I shall be glad. President Hoffman. — With your experi- ence, plow this fall and put on the manure where you expect to sow or plant spring crops. 134 Mr. BKiDaMAN. — My experience with manure put on the freshly plowed land for oats has not proved satisfactory, and I have very little el^ie to sow in the spring. President HoirFMAN. — Plow the corn ground an.', the land on which you expect to sow cor.i for fodder, and manure as the sup- ply is furnished during- winter. Mr. Beidgman. — After drawing out through winter there is enough of the spring make for these needs. Presideat Hoffman — Well, then I will go a step farther. Plow as much of the dryest ground as you think you can enrich with all the manure at hand, and sow rye at the rate of about three bushels to the acre, after harrowing thoroughly to incorporate the luanure with the fresli soil. As soon as the growth in the spring is great enough, before it be'jins to hsja.d, begin cutting and feeding the green crop to the wOws, by which you will increase the flow of milk. Continue this fe-^d as long as it gives good results, and what is left inay go to ripen, giving profit in. another w;i,y. This is a step towards soiling which I may luention as another instance ol:" valuable in- struction !.,cming through these discussions, for when we had this matter before us a few weeks aoo, I ^'as led to the conclusion that both Mr. Bridgman and myself must soon adopt this method to insure continued profit from our cows. I only regret that I have not the manure to use in the way I have ad- vised that I might hasten more rapidly to soiling. My yards are dry and clean so that this opportunity with me is lost. This difEoulty experienced by Mr. Bridg. u;a,n in the use of manure affords another instance of the influence exerted by this club. He has doiibtless bciru led to continue the uie in a way which he now regards as waste, by the arguments in favor of the method offered him. I confess to my full share oi blame in the apprehensiqn that he has to fooie extant been misled by my pi-ac- tice. In our earnest desire to obta.in per- manent grass, perhaps we have tried to dis- cover benefits rather than to note failures. The measure of my success has been greater than his owing to the more favorable soil, no doubt. I have been an earnest advocate of top dressing meadows because it seemed to aiford the only means to establish that char- acter of meadow which wfe so much desire. Through the earnest and repeated discus- sions we have been led to closer observation, in defense of our theories if you please, but ihe result is we have gathered facts by which we are forced to conclude that the wisdom of such use of manure on our soils is doubtful. This whole question of the ap- plication of manure is one of which we have too little knowledge. I hope more careful experiments will be made and reported here, and that other clubs will take up \,h.e matter and give us more light. Mr. Thukston — Lei; Mr. Bvidgman culti- vate a few acres in tobacco and he will ]pe able to get rid of the manure. President Hoffman. — It is easy enough to get rid of it. We want the good there is in it. I am buying manure now, and I wantto utilize the virtues it has. Mr. Billings. —Mr. Bridgman has been putting it on the poorest places. I com- mend the practice and suggest that he bring it to my place, which is one of the poorest I know of, and -.'.'ill make a fine test of the theory that waste places may be made fat by the liberal use of manure. I feel so much interest in the matter that I am willing to relieve him of the labor, and with his permission will draw the manure myself. President Hoffman. — My mind has lately been exercised about the proper means for watering stock in the yards. To-day I have been putting a pump in a well forty-six feet deep, to be used in raising a supply of water for the cattle, and as near as I can e.-;timate cost, the expense will prove greater, to put in the appliances for effecting the ohject, the well being already dug, than the whole cost of a better method. I found myself driven by a necessity and therefore did the work without much time to reflect or to de- vise ways. I was too late for that. What I have done was to avoid a greater trouble, for without some ready means of supply the cattle would have been driven a quarter of a mile to the river, or what would be my choice 135 rather than take that evil, tlie water would have to be drawn and stored in casks for their use. I have been thinkiner that there are many of us who have springs not more than fifty or sixty rods from our barns, from which water might be brought even without much fall,and by means of cisterns, store for use when needed. Even the supply afforded by the root conducted into cisterns and there held, wouli be not only sufficient but in the end cheaper than wells. Such a cis- tern as this would require might be con- structed under any barn on level ground, simply by digging to the proper depth, and of sufficient capacity, grouting the bottom a few inches thick and laying the wall a foot thick in cement. Or if there is a bank at one side the excavation may be made in that which would be better, liecaussj the water could be drawn off without putnjis. I be- lieve this method would prove less expen- sive than the digging of a well twenty feet deep and fitting it witii appliances for draw- ing the water — cheaper than to bring the water from a source sixty rods distaut, re- quiring the use of pipes. And wiiUe we ore about tile work it is easy to proriie good pure water in abundance for the iioiise as well as for the barn, by the SiJ.mo cistern, . having only a filtering wall through which the water must percolate before beiug drawn to the house. My recent experience has reminded me of a conversation with a gentleman from Sene- ca Falls, Wm. G. Wayne, who visited me in the latter part of the summer, and narrated his experience He had been obliged to drive his cattle fifty or more rods to 4rink, until he said he "got tired of it." Giving the matter proper tliought he devised a plan which by a small outlay of money brought permanent relief. He provided' cisterns of sufficient capacity to hold over a dry time, and therefore had no trouble or thought about water for his cattle. Mr. Mills. — How much capacity would be needed to supply ten head of full grown cattle ? President Hoffman.— I can only guess, but I should say a cistern ten feet long, six feet wide and six feet deep would be suffi- cient. I have one eighteen feet long, and six feet in the other dimensions, which,when full, serves my cattle four days, and the herd numbers about seventy-five. Mr. Bkidgman. — I think the President makes too low an estimate. I frequently have to pump three hogsheads for one wat- ering of my cows — forty head. They will drink that amount twice a, day in mild weather. The animal which does the pump- ing has often drank in a day five pailf uls of fourteen quarts each. W. A. Aemsteonq — The only thing re- quired is space enough, if the cattle are to be watered from cisterns fed by the rain fall. Careful observation carried through a series of years has shown that the annual rainfall is in this State about thirty-six inches. It is easy to estimate the size of the reservoir for holding this, taking the roofed area as the basis. But of course provision need not be made for all this supply, for distributed a« it is over the year, one-fourth or less saved at a time won.lil hardly be used up be- fore a su;.iily would be pouring in. I think it has often beeo proved by actual experi- ment, that the water shed by the roof of a barn will supply all thatis needed by as many cattle ,1.5 the barn will shelter. After aU, I believe that in situations w!iere there are living springs, even a hundred yards distant, so located that water can be furnished by gravity, that is the best way. President Hoffman. — -This question of water supply has been on my mind a long time. While putting in the pump in the forty-six feet well I reflected that I had been driven to an expedient, while I should have been prepared to do something ijetter. I looked toward the spring one hundred and fifty yards distant and thought of the cost to bring that water, which, as I should want it, would be one thousand dollars, for I should not use wooden pipe, which soon de- cays or becomes otherwise unservica- ble, although it is the best conduit while it lasts. I should put down galvanized iron pipe in the start. Then I looked to the roof of the barn and believed a full supply could be derived from that source, but the season is too late. The pump is an expedient. At the corner of the barn 136 the sills are going to decay and new ones will soon be needed. So I have resolved to take that opportunity and construct a. cis- tern, or receptacle, iu the baseiuent into which the water trouj the roof shall be led and whence it can be drawn by a .-;hort lift, as occasion requires, by a pump witi, say a four inch bore. There it will be safe from frost, and always at Laud. Mr. AEMSTEOsra — I should go to that spring it it has ilow enough to serve the needs, nnd 1 should not use iron pipe. Pine loijs eight or ten inches in diameter, bored with a two inch augur through the heart, in the old fashioned way, and laid in a ditch three feet deep, the logs connected by means of iron tubes tapering into the ends i-iLumed to r.. ceive theua, will last a gr.eat many years if in clay soil. If kept fiilled with water they would be almost imperish- able. Mr. Billings. — Yes, they will last long enough. The reason they iiave been dis- c irJed by ma.ny is that each log in the old way was tapered down thin to enter the ori- fice in the next, and there was the spot where decay set in, and of cour.se one bad spot spoils all. Mr. Abmst i.oxa. — The ElmiraWaterWorks Co. uses wooden pipe, and wc don't hear of decay, although ns the logs are prepared there is an occasionally weak spot which gives trouble. Mr. Lameeeaus. — I have assisted in mak- ing many repairs for the Company, and I have, noticed the defects are usually bad knots or spots in the timber, which had be- gun to rot before tlie logs were placed. The evidences -.f decay when found are generally at the ends where the logs join. Satorday Evening, Dec. S, 1871, DarJnu' the pa.st month interest in the dis- cussions has bo-ea steadily increasing, and the attendance growing greater. Ic would seem also that iu the adjoining counties, both iu this State and in Pennsylvania, as well as in more reuiote fields, there is a growing de- sire for the formation of agricultural clubs. for numerous letters have been received by the Secretary, requesting information about ':he requirements of this club, and the practi- cal workings. To all such applicants prompt answer* have been given, but the matter be- ing so frequently presented, the club was moved to more full expression regarding the subject of inquiry. President Hoffman in a lew general remarks, set forth the advan- tages to be derived from the practical discus- sions of the topics which engage the thought and work of all farmers who desire advano- ment,and then called the Secretary,who said: "These letters coming to us continually dur- ing the past few weeks, evince a desire on the part of farmers throughout a wide ex- tent of country, for the realization on their part of the many advantages so fully attain- ed by this club. "We meet here regularly to impart and to receive ideas regarding the business in which our best energies are en- gaged. Perhaps some of us come with plausible theories, insufficiently supported by the evidence of the tried fact. But we desire truth. Our business is so great in its requirements, so varied . in its demands, so vast in its proportions, and withal so cer- tainly susceptible of improvement in its best practices, that we must have somewhere a common field which all may enter to carry in what they may and to cull thence ideas to use in the practical direction of affairs. None of us can assume to possess the sum of all knowledge needed to secure the best rewards for our labors. We plow and we sow the seed, we raise cattle and provide their sus- tenance, we provide the chief necessities of life, and the accomplishment comes often at too great cost of labor because we have too lii tie knowledge. It is true practices must differ, because different situations are at- tended by different requirements, and may not,'_therefore, conform to specific rules. It is this which makes us so often appear to those superficial thinkers who regard farming as a very simple business, as playing at cross pur- poses, with no hope of agreement. Tet we do learn. "Who does not know that a wide extent of country has had its agriculture changed through the influence of this club ? I may point to Lhe practices of members who cheerfully testify to their own advancement in knowledge, and who give abundant evi- 137 dence on their farms of the uses to which thought expressed here has been applied. An idea put forth here becomes a public pos- session, and is subject thenceforth not only to the rasping contact of other ideas, but to the critical tests of multiplied prac- tice. It is but a few days since two honored members arose here with confession of error. Our President and Mr. Bridgman, both de- sirous of promoting, by every possible means, a substantial growth of grass such as comes from firm, reliable, compact sod have for years appUed lavishly to their meadows of their great supplies of barn yard manure. They believed the end would certainly be attained by these means. Their faith has not been justified. With that ad- mirable candor which proves that the at- tainment of facts rather than the defence of theories is their desire, they come now before us and say "we have not been able to produce proof of the truth of our teach- ings.'' That is the spirit which makes pro- gress possible. These farmers have for years been advocates of the practice which they now propose to modify, and both have often defended it here, but while doing so their minds have cot been closed to the log- ic of facts. It is but an incident, yet it gives fair illustration of the influence exert- ed by these discussions. Here is a single question in which every one of our farmers is directly interested, the application of ma- nures and nothing but the most general facts regarding it may be set down as fixed. What oar friends fail to accomplish on their soils, we all know is accomplished in othed situations. I wiU not pursue the argument. It needs no proof here to show that farmers' clubs, acting with a desire to eliminate error, from the practices of the members and to pro- duce naked, hard, solid fact to point the way to success, are sure to attain some portion at least of the objects sought. . It has been so often asked "How are these clubs organized and governed ?" that I may be permitted to say briefly here what the chief requirements are, perhaps I shall do well enough if I quote the familiar saying, 'Where two or three are gathered together in the name of the Lord, He is with them,' and asks inquirers to make the adaptation. Get together in the interest of agricultural progress and in spite of rain, or snow, or mud or even laziness, continue the efforts and it is just morally impossible that no good should reward the efforts. The great interests which we represent can not safely be committed to individual hands. There must be a grouping of facts and ideas to give broad basis to progress. Mere talk will have no effect that is good, but that spirit of enquiry which looks always for light and truth wiU, while gaining these, be sure to bless others. As to the government of these clubs noth- ing is wanted more than careful observance of the proper rules of order. Every intelli- gent body of farmers will be able to devise means to meet all legitimate expenses. This club, being incorporated, has its general business affairs subject to rules provided by law, but no club need incorporate until its substance is such as to need legal protec- tion. Mr. Jesse Owen — Of the importance of farmers' clubs and the discussion of farm matters there can be no doubt. The great difficulty in the way of progress is the farm- ers are so little inclined to thought. They perform enough of physical labor and too little of mental labor. The great need of the times, so far as agriculture is concerned, is more thorough education. There is no other interest so great, but all the lesser kinds of business have more of discussion and plans, and study, about the way of pro- moting their welfare. In my judgment the whole country would be immensely benefit- ted by the establishment and maintenance of a farmers' club in every township, of course providing that there should be enough of spirit in each of such communities to give interest to the meeting. As a proof of the advancement which grows out of discussion, and the ventures to which farmers are thereby incited, I desire to speak just here of an incident of which i am reminded by the report of your last dis- cussion. A good word was spoken for Jer- sey cows. I thought of my experience of the opposition, and the ridicule excited 138 among my neighbors when, some years ago^ I determined to introduce the breed. Among these wise neighbors the .Terseys were called rats, runts, scrubs— the laughing stock of all dairymen. I think my father was chief among those who labored to prejudice the public mind in the matter, but, for the last four or five years, now that the experiment has been made, he has declared that no man should undertake dairying without an infu- sion of Jersey blood in his herd. President Hoffman — Do you mean to re- commend the Jersey grades for all dairy pur- poses or only for butter ? Mr. Owen — My experience has been most- ly in butter making, but for two years I sold the milk to Mr. Holbert, who, as a manager of the creamery business, occupies the front rank, and the test thus afforded was very satisfactory. The tests of quality were often made by the cream guage. There is a wide difference in the richness of the milk, not only between individual cows, but between different diai-ies the percentage of cream va- rying through many degrees. J. S. Van Duzee — Oifferent seasons of the year in which the tests are made, account for much of the difference in richness. In the fall, with shrunken yield, there is always a greater percentage of cream. Mr. Owen — Yes, that is, true, and it is also true that another cause tends to create dif- ference of quality, the kind of feed. Eich, old pasture from close, well set sod, makes better milk than newer pasture. Now there is another question to which al- lusion has been made on which we are not clearly settled — the practice of spreading manure on old sod. I have done a great deal of that business, and my experience has led me to conclude there is at least a great deal of waste in the practice. We take too many things for granted. The old way was to draw out the manure aud spread it on the meadows immediately after haying. With- out much thought as to the wisdom of the practice we fall into it, but through the ob- servations aud the criticism of speakers in these discussions we are led to more careful examination of results, aud we find that it is ot profitable. We have a meadow which has been untouched by the plow for forty years and it certainly yields, in good seasons, as much as two and a half tons to the acre, without manure. But there are poor spots on which large amounts of manure have been put and without any visible results. Mr. Beechee. — Perhaps there was some difference in the soil. Mr. Owen. — Not that we could discern. All is bottom land. Mr. Beechee. — Why draw on those spots, poor to start on? Why not encourage growth where there is already a sod, and therefore some chance of grass ? Mr. Owen. — These spots not being good, of course, we desired to bring them up to the excellence of the rest of the field. We have been obliged to employ the plow on some of these meadows where every effort to establish grass by the use of manure and seed had failed. But, once plowed, there seems to be no way to secure afterward per- manent sod. I had a meadow twenty-six yea.rs in grass, and always good, until one season, at a, critical period of growth, there came a drouth which spoiled the crop an^ the sod so that I had to plow. It never had a good sod again in spite of all efforts to es- tablish it. Mr. Vandxtzee— I have been pleased by many of the remarks made here, but es- pecially by the graphic narration of experi- ences by the last speaker when he was con- si"n to be used to great disadvantage. As, for instance, if wheat were on a portion, the remainder could not be pastured in the fall when the wheat is young. And if the preparation be a summer fallow, and corn or other grain crops, or even meadow, be on the portion not fallowed, the pasture of the fal- lowed ground is lost. President Hoifman — What pasture would you expect on a summer fallow ? Mr. McCann — If not plo.vod until June, which is the usual time, there should be a great deal. President Hoffman — Would it be worth the fence to separate, above its manurial value to the fallowed land. Mr. McCann — Well, I cant say how much it would be worth, but I feel very confident that a hundred acre farm divided into four fields of twenty-five acres each, would not be so good for all purposes as if made into much smaller fields. As to pasture, I would rather keep cattle m a field large enough to feed them through the reason. If the pasture be kept abundant the cattle will do better than by frequent changes. Mr. VanDoseb — This idea about separat- ing crops by fences is wrong. One may have wheat, corn, and barley, and grass within the same enclosure just as well as when divided by fences, and there is really no trouble in it. I have a field of fifty acres in which I have passed a regular rotation of com, barley and wheat, using parts of the field separately for each. An important matter to consider in ar- ranging the fields is to get in one enclosare land of as nearly uniform character as possi- ble, because all will be subjected to thfe same treatment. Thus dry, tillable lands t« any extent desired may be enclosed in one field, but it would not be well to have a large enclosure of land one-half of which would be fit to plow and the other half wet mead- ow or pasture land. So far as summer fal- lowed lands are concerned, the pasture they afford, if properly treated, is not worth con- sidering. They want to be kept bare, Whatever weeds or grass appear should be destroyed by cultivation. Speaking of this bare fallow in large fields I'am reminded of an experience in the field of which I have spoken. In 1869 1 planted about eight and a half acres to corn, the ground being rather wet in character and the spring backward, by which planting was made late. Then there came a wet time so that the corn could not be cultivated, and before it was dry enough the Canada thistles were up so high that a horse could not be driven between the rows. Of course I got no corn. The next year I plowed the piece and kept it a naked follow all the sea^ son until time to sow the wheat. There was no spot where the thistle troubled about binding the crop, and I had the excellent yield of three hundred and fifty bushels, and the catch of grass seed was also excellent. Mr. McCann. I had a piece infested with 148 thistles. Two years ago it was in meadow but badly run out by thistles and other weeds, so I plowed it and sowed buckwheat. The thistles came up promptly, making the field green and of course interfering with the growth of buckwheat. The next sea- son I plowed the piece three times and cul- tivated it twice, keeping all green growth checked. At the proper time I sowed wheat and there was not a thistle to be seen with the crop at harvest. I had also an experience on this field wit! air slaked lime. I put eighty bushels on less than an acre before sowing. After the lime came the dragging, and then the drilling. I never saw the least eiiect of that lime in the wheat crop nor in the grass which followed. President HopJman. — Did you sow any part of that field with timothy alone ? Mr. MoCann. — Yes, two pieces, of about three-fourths of an acre each, and I could not discern any better growth than where it was sown with wheat. It took well on all the field where sowed in ^ne fall, although it was late, and when sowed in the spring it was good. Mr. Beidgmah — Take one season with an- other, is it safe to sow timothy with wheat in the fall ? I never sowed so but once and then my judtjment said it would damage the wheat. There was a strip on one side sowed in this way and the remainder sowed in the spring. The result was as I feared — on that strip the wheat was choked out. Satubdat Evenikg, Dec. 19, 1874, Farmers from Southport, Ashland, Horse- heads and Big Flats, as well as Elmira, ga- thered in at the appointed hour, filling the hall with interested members and visitors, many of whom were of the highest rank in their profession. The subject selected for consideration was the stabling of cattle with such eminent farmers as Willis D. Sayieand Levi Marshall of Horseheads, Wm. S. Car- penter of Big Flats, James McOann, George S. Hoffman and John Bridgman of Elmira, all of whom have attained remarkable suc- cess in the management of cattle, to deliver opinions, besides such men as Alpha D. Gris- wold of Southport, Hiram Ketchum of Ash- land, Jonas S. VauDuzer and J). C. Curtis of Horseheads, anr" James F. Beecher, George McCann and many others of Elmira, to pro- mote interest by sharp questions. The sub- ject is always of fresh interest to farmers at this season of the year, and especially in this locality, where hay and all other feed rules high, making the business of feeding precarious at the best, and with any thing short of the best management certainly un- profitable. President Hoffman opened the way for debate by a few general remarks on the ne- cessity tor reaching the best practices in this important branch of farm economy, and in closing, expressed the desire that eminent feeders present would make full statements of practice and be free also with sugges- tions. Mr. McCann — It is not a safe way for the wheat, but it is very safe for the timothy. — It is so sure to catch and do well when sown in the fall on wheat that I am willing tc take some chance. President Ho]?i'man — My practice is tc wait a few days after the sowing- of the wheat before putting on timothy seed. By this means its growth is so retarded that the injury by crowding the erally avoided. J. S. Van Duzer — While there are so many here well qualiiied to instruct ordinary farmers on this matter of stabling cattle, it is certain that this meeting will be a profit- able one, even if they do no more than to relate experiences, which, with them, have run through a long course of years in the handling of all the common classes of cattle. I regard it as very fortunate for us that Mr. Willis B. Sayre, who has been specially in- vited to meet us, is present. A brief state- ment of experiences and observations in the matter of stables and their ventilation, re- cently published in the Huslandman, related wheat is gen- j to his management, and as I am informed I is pronounced by him quite correct. We 149 have now the opportunity to call out more, and I hope he may be called at once because his suggestions will assuredly stimulate dis- cussion. Mr. Satke. — I have read the reports of your discussions for years, with both pleas- ure and profit, and I am here now, rather for the desire of more information than to ad- dress you. But willing to contribute such ideas as I have gathered by years of observa- tion in the feeding and management of cat- tle, 1 shall claim your attention for a few minutes. The point which I desire to see move plainly is, what is the difference in the cost of keeping cattle in a good and growing con- dition in well constructed and properly ven- tilated stables, or in the barn yard and field with fair shed protection ? I have had some experience, but it has not been entirely satisfactory. I have, however, been led to believe by such experience that there is a marked difference in the amount of hay consumed in these respective condi- tions, and that there is decided economy in stabling, the wisdom of which depends upon the care in feeding and management, and the proper ventilation of the stable, and upon the protection from winter winds, when the animals are turned out for water or for exercise. I deem it important that the stable should be so ventilated that the air within shall be at all times as nearly pure as possible as compared with the outer air. And it is hardly of less importance that the cold air should be let in for ventilation in such a manner that it shall not flow directly upon the cattle. To avoid the evil effects of cold currents of air in direct contact, provision should be made to let in the outer air through openings as far above the backs of the cattle as possible. My early experience led me to doubt the wisdom of stabling cattle when feeding, with the objects of improvement and increase of growth. I think it was because I overlooked the necessity for sufBcient and properly lo- cated ventilation as well as the necessary protection to the cattle from the cold winds while in the yards. Mr. Van Duzeb. — Permit me to interrupt. Why would you protect the cattle when turned out ? Mr. Satbe. — In very cold or windy days there is too much contrast between the full protection of the stables and complete ex- posure without. I deem it very necessary to provide partial protection to avoid the shock which comes from such contrast. But to return to the ventilation. There is necessity that it should be regulated ac- cording to circumstances. Openings very well suited for use to-day may not be what will be suited for use to-morrow. Even in the coldest weather I find it better to let in the outer air, but I have such provisions that the wind wUl not drive directly on the cattle. The windows are located as high as they can be placed, and are about twenty inches square. Now when a north wind is blowing I open the south windows and keep the north windows closed — and so when a south wind prevails I change the order to suit. The information I seek is in regard to the difference m the amount of hay required to keep a given number of cattle of the same class and character, taking account also of their weight, in doors and out ; keeping all in both cases alike improving. My experi- ence and observation in practical tests made with a view to the solution of this problem has been confined to two experiments not sufficiently accurate to satisfy my mind as to the precise difference in cost, although in general results very conclusive so far as these tests were carried. The first was with sixteen steers weighing from ten and a half to eleven hundred pounds each. For fifteen days when stabled the daily consumption of hay by each animal was eighteen and a half pounds, and besides each steer had a daily feed of two pounds of meal. During this time all were evidently improving. This was in the last half of April. In another year I fed twenty -five cows in the yard and field during the entire month of April and found the daily requirement of each cow was twenty-two pounds of hay with no grain. The hay was carefully weighed and fed either in clean places in the yard or on the sod of the adjoining field of two acres, and all litter was kept cleaned up 150 every day, so there was seemingly no waste of hay. I may add, these cows plainly ex- hibited improvement during the thirty days. These experiments were not entirely sat- isfactory because one was with steers fed for growth, and the other with cows, and in the one case there was a feed of grain, while in the other there was not. I settled only the amount of feed required in each ease, hut there is the question left : Did those steers eat any less hay because of the two pounds of meal fed to each every day ? My conclusions after some years of what may be called careful observations are, that taking account of the actual requirements for food and the inevitable waste in out of door feeding, the difference in favor of prop- erly constructed and well ventilated stables in the saving they make possible in food, is fully one-fourth, and that in such stables the better comfort and thrift of the animals is attainable. Mr. Van Duzer — How often did you feed? Mr. Satbe — Twice a day. In the morning as much as the cattle would consume and ad- ding to the feed as they seemed to require, and after having fed full nothing more given until the evening feed when they were again given all they would eat. Mr. VanDuzee — Do you use stanchions to confine the animals to the stable ? Mr. Sayee— Both stanchions and gates. The latter are not admissable for cows in milk, because they can slip forward and back too much for convenience,but for som esteers reluctant to enter the stanchions, that would enter the gates cheerfully. This I have ac- counted for on the supposition that in the stanchions these steers have been overawed by the demonstrations of those standing near.but in the gates there is complete isola- tion and therefore no steer has fear of his neighbor. Mr. Van Duzer — Did you never mate a comparative test between in door and out door feeding ? Mr. Satre — Years ago I had twenty-one steers of as nearly uniform character as I could select, and I put twelve of them in the stable, leaving'nine to run in the yard, with sheds for protection. The nine were fed from racks with the bars so close that they had to pull out fodder by their tongues. By this means I expected them to feed more slowly and to waste less of their feed. Of course they could get enough, but it required a longer time than if they could thrust their noses in. When the weather was very bad I spread hay on clean places so that they could feed more quickly. There was no accurate weighing to decide how much more hay they required than those fed in the stables, yet it was evident that each animal consumed more than any one in doors. President Hoffman — Did your observa- tions lead to a comparison of the growth of the two lots ? Mr. Satre. — Yes. I had an old friend who watched the experiment with me. At first he thought that the out-of-door lot was more thrifty, an opinion which I shared. Later it was a matter of doubt and after some weeks we agreed that the stabled steers were making the better growth. We concluded, also that the nine head out-of- doors consumed as much as the twelve head in the stable. Mr. Van Duzer.— -Why do you feed but twice a day ? Mr. Sayrb. — Because when the catde are fed full in the morning they have no need during the day and being deprived of hay for that time causes them to return to their feed with good appetites, when their evening sup- ply is offered. Mr. Van Duzer. — Then it seems to be your object to induce them to eat as much as possible. Mr. Sayre. — Certainly. We do not want to just keep our cattle, we want them to eat for another purpose, to improve. I am con- vinced that in the experiment in which I gave a daily feed of two pounds of meal, the steers eat none the less hay, on the contrary I think they eat more, because the meal gave i ncreased vigor, and therefore increased ap- petite. 151 Mr.W. S. Cabphnteb.— You couldn't carry- that far. Mr. Satre. — Ne. Large feeds of meal would diminish the requirement for hay, but if I want to induce my cattle to eat all the hay they can, I think such a small grain feed secures the desired result. Mr. Caepenteb. — This is a, subject in which we all feel great interest. I have been turning it over in my mind for the last ten years, and I do not yet feel decided whether stables are better for steers than good yards with open sheds. Sometimes I have thought that I would build stables in which to keep the stock closely confined, and at other times I thought it would be waste. Let me say right here that no man need expect to succeed in feeding cattle simply by following Mr. Sayre's instruction — at least to succeed as he does. It would be necessary, with or without stables, to do as he does. He is the best feeder in this section of the State, cer- tainly the best in this county. Possibly Charles Balcom, in Steuben, is his equal, but let uo man start off and attain their suc- cess, for he will be disappointed. He will not grasp the true idea of management as they do. I have come to the conclusion that not all men of equal talent can succeed alike in the same business. Some men, with fine ability, fail where others, not suppesed to be their superiors, succeed. As for myself, I could never succeed in getting my steers to eat heavy in the stable, and I may say my father met the same difficulty. I have taken hay out from the bunks after the steers ] had persistently refused to touch it on the gi-ound, when the same steers in fifteen minutes after being turned out, would eat it with fine relish. It s in my mind an open question, if steers will not do better out than in, especially in the spring, when the temperature is grow- ing milder. Certainly in my experience, they have eaten better. I have one bunk in my yard from which I could | never induce the steers to eat hay, and yet from this^bunk the hay has been carried out to the open ground and there eaten greedily. I fuUy concur in the opinion expressed by Mr. Sayre that stabled cattle need protec- tion when turned out, and 1 have no doubt that good sheds are very necessary to the successsful feeding of any class of cattle, and I am also satisfied that the cost of con- struction of such sheds is greater than the cost ofstables. The advantage is the greater ease and freedom enjoyed by the cattle, and the less liability to sudden changes, as in the case of cattle kept in warm stables and turn- ed into the blast to get their drink or for ex- ercise. Ih such cases protection is very necessary, but when steers are fed in the open air they do not seem to mind the cold. I am speaking of steers and not of cows. With them the same rules might not apply. Steers have greater vitality. Cows usually enter the winter in low condition, having been milked down, while steers go in with full vigor. I have seen them in full flesh, and with full bellies go out from their feed and, from choice, select an open place where the wind would be a piercing gale and turn- ing tails to it contentedly chew their cuds as if nothing were Ibft to be desired. I have no doubt that such stock can be carried through the winter with less consumption of fodder by the use of stables, but will there be the same general thrift and robust vital- ity ? It takes feed to resist the chilling and weakening effect of the low temperature in our winters. And it needs good full flesh as well. Poor animaU should have the protection of stables without doubt, so I am not surprised to see dairymen provide such accommodations for their cows, but I am not yet fully convinced that it is better for steers kept for growth and flesh to be penned up in stables, although I freely ad- mit the great success attained by Mr. Sayre. Mr. Satre — Perhaps I can hint at the reason why Mr. Oai-penter's steers refused to eat hay in his sheds. If they are reasona- bly intelligent they must feel indignant that with his great sheltered space, he has not provided them comfortable stables in which they could have pure air and eat their fodder without fear, having also protection from the blasts which they are so well able to resist, because at great expense of feed he has put so much flesh upon them. Mr. Levi Marshall — I consider myself 152 young in tlie business of keeping cattle, al- though I have heen twenty years engaged in it. My father-in-law was an Englishman andhewasamore stillful feeder of cows than I am, although I keep my cows in good stables and he did not. He managed tokeep them fat in the open yard without any shel- ter. All day long he would be engaged in foddering, little lots of hay scattered here and there, keeping them constantly tempted uutil about four o'clock in the evening when he would give enough to last|all night. They would then eat full and lie down anywhere contentedly. Even when he took poor cows in the fall to begin feeding he would fetch them out fat in the spring. When I feed in the open yard, as I have to do sometimes when I have a few cows too many, there is great waste by the stronger robbing the weaker animals. Yet I like the idea of the freedom afforded by an open range. If I had but four or five cows I think I should keep them loose, but with a large herd the plan is inadmissable. Mr. James McCann — I have had consider- able experience in keeping steers and I have usually managed to give them freedom at night, using the stables principally for feed- ing. It has been my impression that they would do better out than in, except of course in very bad weather. I have noticed that heavy steers turned out from the stanchions, after they had been kept in too long, would go into the yard and lie down, even before going to drink, and this has seemed to indi- cate that they wanted rest. The yard should be in good order and welllittered with straw. Steers well fed and in good flesh do not seem to be affected by cold. Mr. VanDuzeb— Can you give a reason why Mr. Carpenter's steers will not eat in the stable ? Mr. McCann — I can not. I have had no trouble in getting animals to eat. My pre- ference for the yard is because of the greater freedom afforded. In bad weather I have often kept them in the stanchions feeding well, but without that quiet rest which I fancied they should have. Mr. Mabshall — I suppose there is a bad odor about Mr. Carpenter's stables which causes his steers to refuse their feed. He has told UB that the same feed when taken out was eaten. The shaking up and airing has made it palatable. Mr. Satbe — My impression is that when we put up cattle for the first they do not eat enough for three or four days, or until they become used to confinement. The stabling must be pursued steadily and not one day in and another day out. Get them accustomed to the situation. Mr. Tan Dtjzee — Did yon ever attempt to winter your cattle on corn stalks? Mr. Satee — Tes, and with very good suc- cess for the first time in which they were fed. But I would not feed the stalks alone. My plan was to give one feed of the stalks, as much as the cattle will eat, and make the next feed of hay. Mr. Geokgie S. McCann — Will it pay to cut the stalks ? Mr. Satee — Most certainly. I resorted_to that because I found there was benefit in giving so much of preparation. They need also to be slightly moistened, because when very dry the cattle do not seem to relish them. Mr. Van Duzee If you dampen them will they not ferment ? Mr. Satee — They would, no doubt, if left long enough, but we never cut more than three or four day's supply and have had no trouble; neither from this cause nor from freezing. Kfr. Van Duzee — How much more grain do you have to feed with corn stalks than with hay ? M. Satbe — As I have said I never feed corn stalks exclusively. As I use them I do not increase the grain feed. I find that the only time to feed corn stalks profitably or rather induce the cattle to eat them well is when there is snow on the ground, perhaps because this aids in supplying the requisite moisture. Mr. Van Duzeb — When cut, what propor- 153 tion of the stalks is rejected as compared with the uncut ? Mr. Sayre. — About the same. Mr. Cakpenter — I saw in Mr. Charles Balcom's yard once a wagon with a, great box on it, in which he drew the cut stalks, and there was a pair of oxen licking off the stalks while there was plenty of good hay within ten feet. I asked if there was any meal on them and was answered "no." Mr. Balcom added, "give them all the cut stalks they want and they will want no hay." The very best judge of cattle I ever knew was Jvidge Balcom, and he was also an ex- cellent feeder. He told me that when he tried a part of his cattle in the stable and a part out the latter did the better. Mr. Satbe — That would depend very much upon the provision made for stabling and upon the condition of the yard. With good sheds and plenty of straw, no doubt great comfort can be secured in the yard. But can we depend on the supply of straw ? Mr. Carpentbb — Straw is a great deal better to lie on than to eat. President Hoffman — Suppose we do not have it ? Mr. Cabpentee. — I buy it for my cattle as I have to-day for they must have it. Mr. BEiDGMAN.^My experience in the winter keeping of cattle has been mostly with cows kept in the stable. Twenty years ago my father kept cattle without much pro- tection from the weather, usually in the open yard with but a stack of straw to give shelter and feed given all out of doors. My observation then led me to begin prepara- tion for stabling, and ever since my plans were projectei and executed, my cows have been stabled in winter without any ill effects that I have noticed. I hear of steers going out of the stan- chions to lie down in the yard for rest. It appears to me there is no argument in that, for I have cows that will go into the stan- chions apparently with the same motive. There is one in particular that invariably lies down very soon after she enters, so that even in summer we have to hasten to milk her after she is put up, or she wiU lie down. and she gives every sign of enjoyment of the situation. Often when I go out at night 1 find all lying down chewing their cuds as contentedly as if they were loose, and with- out doubt in the actual enjoyment of more comfort than it would be possible to provide in the yard, unless at great expense for sheds, and for straw with which to litter them. But there is necessity for bedding in the stables as well as in the yard. There is a common mistake in building the stanchions, by which the cattle have to lie with their heads elevated. The bottom rail which holds the upright pieces in place should be as narrow as possible, so that their heads may go down to the level, with noth- ing to choke or push against the neck. When so made cows will lie in all positions, sprawl- de on their sides or curled as naturally as when having absolute freedom out of doors. As to the feed, I am satisfied that it does not require more than two-thirds the feed in the stable that it does out, to keep cattle- n either situation in good, vigorous and thrifty condition. I agree with others here that when they are turned out there is no need of shed protection, for, with- out doubt, there is greater sensitiveness in the stabled cattle, and they are more easily affected by cold. My practice is to shut the cows up again after very brief exercise when the weather is bed, but in good days to give them a longer run, sometimes nearly all day. Mr. S. A. Chapman — Is not that cow which is fond of going in the stanchions to lie down, an underling in the herd ? Mr. Bridgman— No, sir. She is one of the strongest cows in the yard. Mr. Marshall — I, too, have cows that seem to seek the stanchions to lie down, par- ticularly one that leaks her milk; we have to attend to the milking as soon as she is in or she will lie down. President Hoffman — I suppose it is about thirty years since the first stanchions were built in this county by Col. Foster a pioneer in many improvements. He used to buy steers in the fall of the neighboring farmers with the purpose of feeding for growth. — When it became known that he intended to confine them in stanchions, it was freely 164 predicted that he would meet great loss. — Neighbors said "they would get stiff and die." But after a winter's keeping these steers sold for double their cost in the fall. In fact Col. Poster made money by such win- tering. So others were encouraged to have stanchions, and so far as I know, those who began stabling in any way did not abandon it. But it must be borne in mind that stables will not winter cattle. It requires feed and care besides. 1 may say to Mr. Marshall that if he will bestow upon his cows the same care that his father-in-law did, they will reward it as they did his care. We are told that he fed all day, that is he spent the whole day among his cattle looting after their comfort and necessities. Let any man of good intelligence do that and his cattle will thrive with or without stables. My experience has been had mostly within the last fifteen years, and almost exolusively with cows, and in that time I have had many that have taken on flesh so that in the spring they have been what Mr. Sayre or Mr. Car- penter would term fine beef, almost first- class, although they continued to give milk. i have sold such right from the stable for ninety, eighty, and down to fifty dollars, ac- cording to weight and condition. It is my theory that the substances which go to make milk, make also fiesh. Now these cows, liberally fed to mate milk, pro- duced something more, because they could not convert into milk all that their vigorous appetites induced them to consume. But if they were turned into the yard to run through a few cold days, there would have been a shrinking of the uiilk, even with the feed kept up to the amount consumed in the stable. Such has been my observation. I think then there would not be as good growth in fiesh. When a man cannot work comfortably about the yard without having his coat tightly buttoned, it is too cold for the cows. The man needs the full pro- tection of his clothing and the cow needs such protection as the stable affords. It is true that very fat cattle can better resist cold, and it may pos- sibly be true that such very fat animals are made uncomfortable by the restraint of the stable, they may get so fat that they need more ventilation, but there is little reason to fear any suffering from this cause with the most of our stock. With clean and well ven- tilated stables cows seem to have but the other natural wants, care, feed and drink. With such experience as I have had I can- not doubt that there is decided advantage in stabling. The discussion was continued much be- yond the usual hour, and even after the ad- journment farmers gathered in groups about the hall and continued the interchange of ideas until nearly midnight. The next meet- ing will consider "The propriety of feeding different kinds and classes of stock together." S.vTTjEDAY Evening, Dec. 26, 1874, This meeting, the last of the year, fell upon a beautiful moonlight night, with so clear and crisp an air that riding or walking was delightful exhileration. For this reason, as well as for the interest in the discussion, the attendance was full. There was Car- penter of Big Flats, who delighted the Club by his presence, which cost him, coming and going, twenty miles of travel. Col. Hoffman of Horseheads, A. D. Griswold of Southport, W. K. Vaughn and several others of Big Flats, and from the city Major Hotchkin, who is almost a regular visitor, Robert Neil- son of N. C. Railway, John S. and Joseph Hoffman, Jesse Owen, and a score of others who attend at irregular intervals, as well as the old members, such as the McCanns, Chap- mans, Carrs, Billings, Carpenters, and so on through the list. The happy anniversary meeting of Wednes- day night, at which there were gathered over four hundred members and guests, might well have formed the theme for an hour's talk, but no allusion was made to the happy meet- ing. It left only pleasant, even delightful impressions on all. There was no need of talk — nothing to settle, nothing to arrange, nor to compromise. The first regular business was the reading of letters, only one of which had public in- terest. It is given in full except address and signature. "I read the reports of your meetings and take a great deal of interest in them. I should Uke to ask your Club a few questions : 155 1st. What is the best mode of churning, working and packing butter ? 2d. "What is the best management of house help ? 3d. How can we make home more attrac- tive so it would be a pleasure far husbands to stay at home evenings ? Mrs. E. B. S., Chemung." President Hoffman said : "It will bo well to consider these very proper questions in their order, taking first that which relates to butter making." Looking over the mem- bers to find a capable respondent, he fixed upon Ool. Hoffman, the largest maker of butter in Southern New York and perhaps in the State, of whom he requested answer. With evident reluctance and sententious brevity Col. Hoffman said : "I should hate to stand here to instruct butter makers in Chemung. I don't assume to be able. They will get better instructions at home than in Horseheads. I know no methods superior to those used in the town of Chemung or I may say throughout the county of Chemung, whether all the milk be churned or only the cream. And I know of no better way to get the butter than by the old-fashioned churn." Observing the necessity of drawing out the witness, the President asked : "Do you oommenf' the old dash churn as the best ?" Col. Hoffman — I never tried any other. There are many offered with great promise but I prefer to let other butter makers prove them. President Hoffman — Can you recommend any machine for working which is applicable to small dairies ? Col. Hoffman — I hardly know what would be called small dairies, but if to say ten cows, there are several kinds in use which perform the work well, and effect a consider- able saving in labor over the ladle and hand working, although a skillful worker will do as well with the ladle as by any machine so far as excellence of work is concerned. But it is very laborious and slow. The machines which I like best are those which come the nearest to hard working. Among these are several whichhave inclined planesj on which the churning is placed and the buttermilk worked out by simple pressure or by fluted rolls passing over the mass, the buttermilk when released passes down the inclined plane into a receptacle place on the floor to receive it. These machines make the work more easy and rapid and are better than un- skilled hands. President Hoffman — Tour reference to unskilled hands would seem to leave the inference that such might damage the but- ter. Col. Hoffman — Yes there^is a great deal of butter hurting in the working. It is done by a sliding motion of the ladle. Deal- ers say it breaks the grain. It really makes the butter sticky. It gives it a resemblance to lard. There are only two purposes in working butter — to free it from buttermilk and to effect uniform salting. The least work with which these objects can be ac- complished is the best. President Hoffman — Have you nothing to say about the packing with reference to long keeping ? Col. Hoffman — I have only tried the or- dinary oaken packages for the butter which is designed for keeping. The most of mine is sent to market in return pails which are used again as often as necessary. A. D. Geiswold — I noticed at the Eoch- ester State Pair, firkins that were headed up and provision made for filling in brine at the bung. It seemed to me a handy way. The usual plan is to have the heads out and the keep covered with brine until the butter is in market. Col. Hoffman— I had the firkins at the Fair which he describes. All there was of it was the pouring in brine through an open- ing provided for that purpose after the fir- kins were headed, instead of the ordinary open package with cloth and salt brine. About five years ago I thought of this as an easy way cf keeping, and submitted several firkins to the test. I found that such heavy dealers as J. S. Martin,and Hunter & Adams of New York, approved of the plan, and even regarded it as the best for packages that were to be kept long, because they could be placed in the cellar and the brine filled in as often as it leaked away, keeping as well there as in our cellars. In packing for this way of keeping it is necessary to take exact weight before the brine is poured 156 in and to keep the record. Taking out the | consideration. It would be well for any weight of empty package and tne usual j woman who asks it to propound to herself soakage there is the net butter without re- gard to the weight of brine. Mr. G. S. McCann— What salt do you use ? Col. Hoffman — Ashton. Not becouse it is better than Syracuse salt, but because but- ter salted with it sells better. I never could see that it was any way superior, except, per- haps, that it dissolves more readily. There is fashion in these things and of course there is more or less of prejudice. I have used Syracuse salt and found it an excellent dairy salt, so far as I could test it in comparison with Asbton. President Hoffman — The butter question seems" to have been answered as fully as the members present are now inclined to speak. Let us take up the matter of "house help." Some remarks more facetious than in- structive were made in several parts of the hall. A droll effort was made to refer the question to a superannuated manager, but the effervescence of fun being passed G. S. McCann said : "This is a question of real ioaportance which has a direct bearing upon nearly all farm homes. My idea is that good wages should be given and the girls treated as nearly like the other members of the family as the circumstances will permit." President Hoffman — And I will add that for good wages and, for good treatment it is well to exact good service. Mr. G. S. McCann— Yes, that is right. But it must be remembered that there are hundreds who have no appreciation of good treatment. There is oAwajs obligations on both sides and there is failure often to meet it. Good service deserves better con- sideration than poor, and is very likely to find it. The question how to make home attrac- tive so that husbands should not stay out late at night coming up, the suggestion was made that good husbands who rarely visit the Club or any other evening entertainment, conspicuous examples being named, should furnish the solution. But all such chose to preserve their secret, leaving directions to those who are sometimes out o' nights. S. M. Care— The query is worthy of full first the question : "Am I always in the proper frame of mind to receive my husband with such a cheer as he needs ?" She who meets the tired worker on his return from labor or the cares of business, with fretting and frowns, cannot expect to entice his stay, if there is a place near where he can escape into more genial society. He needs sympa- thy and support. On the other hand he may be too coarse and unfeeling to appre- ciate the fact that something of the air of home depends on his manners. The whole matter is one which requires thought — care- ful thought by which the causes of wrong may be discovered ; and then the spirit of determined good will by which the evil shall be overcome. Mr. S. HoTCHKiN — These observations, so far as they extend, are all just and true. The question seemed to excite mirth in the minds of some gentlemen, but it is one which should not be treated with levity nor lightness. It is true ihat in all the acces- sories of life, whether on the farm or in the shop or in household dutie.s, there is a good deal of a,brasion and harrassing care. But, by accommodating condescension on botti sides, the worst effects of these can be avoided. There is, in all toe affairs of the world, more or less of trouble to be met. Cares are constantly present, whether with the poor or the rich, but they need not rob home of its attractions if there is the reso- lute will to meet them. Of course, to make home attractive, it must have adornments and fittings that ex- hibit taste and a dispositioa to please. A slovenly home cau never be happy, at least with the full measure of happiness. And it is equally true that homes extravagantly fitted beyond the means of the occupants must have perplexities and unhappiuess. Adornments may be simple, yet neat, and pleasant. No matter how simple so they add to the attractions of home. To state the whole matter, the house must have its rooms as sunny as bright and as pure as the air out of doors, and all the persons who oc- cupy them must have pure hearts, honest desires, and a purpose to do duty in any sta- tion in which they may be placed. 157 At the last meeting, the discussion being on the stabling of stouk, the President had given considerable latitude to the speakers so that feeding came up for remark, and there was also something said of the keeping of different kinds and grades of stock to- gether. The interest manifested then led to the selection of these matters for the present meeting. W. S. Carpenter being the first speaker called besause of his loQg and suc- cessful experience in the management of stock, responded by saying tersely : "You don't want many kinds of stock together. That is plam enough, but I can't tell you to what limit you may go. I am not the prop- er person to give you information on these subjects. I was here at the last meeting and talked more than my share, so I hoped to be excused now ; but as you insist on my experience being told, I say that I neve own- ed but one sheep in my life, and I sold that as quick as I could. I am very sure that cattle dc not thrive well with sheep, but I have not proved it in my experience. The knowledge comes from observation of the practice of other farmers who have had sheep in the same pasture with their steers or cows, and I have noticed always in the cases which have come before me that when so pastured the cattle were poor. I watch- ed the effect on the cattle, because that came within my business. On the other hand some of the men who pasture their sheep and cattle together say that it is not good for their sheep. They see their profits in sheep, while I try to find profits in cattle. I would not keep horses and cattle together, for although I don't know but they would do well enough in good pasture, as far as mere feeding is concerned, I am always afraid that the horses will kill the cattle, but it never troubles me about any danger to the horses. I think different kinds and grades of cattle should be kept in separate pastures whenever it is practicable to do so. I wouldn't have pigs run in with cattle, al- though from a single experience with two pigs, I am satisfied that as far as they are concerned it was good enough to let them run, but I object on account of the cattle. Those pigs would thrive whether there was enough for the cattle or not." President Hoffman — In his barn-yard. while he was feeding corn stalks, it is rea- sonable to suppose that they would, for their fare was something like that described by a German farmer who kept his cattle well, and when asked how he managed to secure so much thrift, said "straw was the only feed, and yet that was not half thrashed." Mr. Carpenter's habit is to leave all soft corn and small nubbins on the stalk. Of course what the pigs get is so much taken from the cat- tle. I notice in the reports of agricultural dis- cussions whenever any farmer speaks of feeding cattle he recommends meal. All seem to agree in that, but there all stop. I want to go farther. I want to know how much meal, and if some other than corn meal may not be even preferable. lam sat- isfied that com meal is very good feed for cows,although it will not materially increase the yield of milk. But, notwithstanding the expressed opinion of the President of the State Dairymen's Association, who says that such feed does not make richer milk than that produced from -good grasses, I must say that in my judgment it does. Now while I regard corn meal an excellent feed for cows, I think it may be improved by mixing with it something lighter — as brew- er's grains or light brans, whether buck- wheat or wheat. For sheep, oil meal and these lighter feeds would certainly be better than corn meal alone. On the whole, while I should like to have considerable corn meal for my cows, I should give preference to oil meal as being the richer feed. It costs more, it is true, but it is worth more. But, with any of these rich feeds, there is need of ad- mixture with the lighter products of grain, or with oats or with all these. I am in fav- or of diversity of feed for all kinds of stock, whether cattle, horses, sheep or swine. The argument is in favor of variety, as it is in the food of the human family. We feel that we can hardly live on any one kind of food, no matter how good it is. Good health is maintained and promoted by the use of va- rious kinds of food, and the argument has like application, in a lesser degree perhaps, to all our farm stock. Even in pastures ev- ery grazier desires as many kinds of good grasses as he can get, because he believes his cattle thrive better with a variety in 158 tlieir food. Just so with grains, there is great advantage in variety — the cattle do- ing better, and with a diminished cost. Mr. Caepbnteb.— Members seem to think that I am a feeder, but it is a mistake. I never feed grain in any considerable quanti- ties. I am a grazier and not a feeder. Two quarts of meal daily to a steer is as much as I generally feed, my object being to make growth rather than fat by it. And I agree with the President that the meal is improv- ed as feed when it is lightened by something coarser, like bran or ground oats. Mr. J. M. Baker — My first experience in keeping horses and cattle together is recent. Having small calves of the Alderny breed they were able to crawl under the fencs and get in with my horses, which they did, and as a consequence I have one with a broken shoulder. I conclude it is not well to keep calves and horses together. Having a crop of oats raised after buck- wheat the previous season I have now mixed feed by force of circumstances and would like to ask Mr. Carpenter what is the best way to use it. Shall I grind it and feed with hay and such roots as I have ? I can use some carrots and I have Sweedish turnips which I ca.n chop up for feed. Mr. Carpentee — When you come down to the turnips I have to say I don't know much about them, but the grain is good whether the kinds are seperate or together. Take the mixed oats and buckwheat and grind to- gether; and if you want to improve it, put corn meal with it. I should prefer one hun- dred pounds of feed with one quarter ground oats and three quarters ground corn meal, to one hundred pounds of clean corn meal. I think one-third oats, one-third buckwheat and one-third corn would be preferable as feed to pure corn meal. As I have told you I have no experience in heavy feeding. I have fed light for many years and long ago I came to set high value on potatoes as feed for cattle. I have chop- ped up many hundreds of bushels and I con- clude with such experience and observation as I have had that a steer will do better on a half bushel of potatots and four quarts of corn meal daily than on twelve quarts of meal without the potatoes. President Hoitman — I am not afraid to feed turnips to cows and I would take them into the list of kinds of feed whenever I can raise thom without too great cost. I should be glad of some to feed this winter. I have fed as many as three thousand bushels in a season and the customers who took the milk knew of it and made no complaint of falling off in quality. Of course milk made from turnips alone would be very poor. And if made from turnips and dry hay 1 think if drawn to a, depth not greater than ten or eleven inches in the pail it would be easy to see the bottom through it. Turnips are good as an appetizer. They are wholesome diet for the animals that eat them ; but if given to cows in milk there should be a lib- eral accompaniment of grain and where so fed I fully believe they improve even the quality of the milk. Potatoes are better — so are carrots possibly and these may be fed in such a way as to injure the milk, for aught I know. It is certain turnips may and as certain that when fed with a proper allowance of grain they do not impart anj perceptible flavor to the milk. I should be very glad of twenty-five hv ndred bushels to feed to fifty cows during the present win- ter. I made an experiment once to determine the relative value of potatoes, turnips, car- rots and beets as milk-producing feed. I fed eight weeks on these roots w regular allowance of hay and grain, carrying a, cer- tain number of cows a given time on each kind of roots. I found one peck of potacoes produced as good results as one bushel of any of the ott er kinds, and so far as my ex- periment went there was no difference in the results produced by the turnips, carrots and beets. Mr. G. S. McCann— Would they have been better cooked ? President Hoffman — I think they would. Mr. Baker — Last fall, being short of pas- ture because I was breaking up the field, I fed my cows all the turnip tops they could eat, leaving them in the pasture until it was all plowed. Cows and calves all ran togeth- er, making those turnip tops and roots al- most the sole living, although I fed some buckwheat bran. For the first three or four 159 days the milk tasted badly but after that there was nothing obiectionabie in it. We made butter and sold it without any com- plaints coming back. I have sometimes thought that the failure to detect the tur- nip flivor was due to the fact that we got used to itj but then it should have been found by th« purchasers of the butter and it was not. I have fed turnips to beef cattle, making them very fat without grain, although I have usually given carrots a week or two be- fore slaughtering to impart color to the beef. I put two eows in the stable one fall and fed them all the turnips they could eat, fin- ishing on carrots a week or two before T sold them. They grew very fat. One sea- son I put up about forty steers, nearly half being three or four years old. Of these I selected twelve and fed them so as to sell at about the holidays. They made very fat, nice beef. A solemn gentleman said : "Thi? sur- prises me because it differs so much from my observation. I knew of a controversy between two neighbors in Pennsylvania on the merits of flat turnips, which they mu- tually agreed to settle by a test and to make it interesting they laid a wager of one hun- dred dollars. They took a yoke of cattle as nearly alike as possible ; one man tieing his ox to the fence and feeding him all the tur nips he could eat and nothing else. The other man was to tie his ox up in the same manner and throw snowballs at him and nothing else. At the end of a week of these respective ways of feeding each man was to have his respective ox weighed, and the one which exhibited the greatest gain was to take down the money. The respected man who threw the snow-balls raked down the pile." Mr. Baseb — I have made more money by feeding dry hay and turnips than I could by feeding grain. Col. Hoffman — I would ask the President if in the experiment he made in feeding the different roots he ebserved a difference in the richness of milk ? President Hoffman •>— My observation did not extend so far, quantity being the only criterion of the relative values. There is an argument in favor of diversity of feed in the fact that it permits us to use much that is regarded by many as objection- able, cheapening the cost of keeping without deteriorating the quality of the products. Brewers' grains are regarded as light feed. I first learned of their use for cows in Orange county, where I was informed that care in their uses was necessary, because the sole tendency was to increase the milk, and if fed in too large quantities the cows would milk down poor — would even milk to death. For several years I fed cautiously, but four or five years ago, when I had fifty-four cows, I found I could feed only one ton of hay to each during the winter,so I looked about for a substitute. That was partly o'btained by the use of two hundred and sixty-six bushels of brewers' grains every week. In addition to this I fed during the winter, twenty tons of oil meal, about forty tons of buckwheat bran, and hilf as much of wheat bran. In the fields my cows never did better than during that winter. A part of the time I had a, surplus of milk which was churned. Fifty of the cows had dropped their calves in October or later, so that they were com- paratively fresh, and yet one of the churn- ings gave a psund of butter to eight quarts of milk, and none of them required more than ten quarts. With the light feed that I have named I fed fifteen hundred bushels of turnips, and it.will be seen that by the butter test the milt was of excellent quali- ty, whUe in quantity it was much above the average. Mr. HoTOHKEN — Oil meal is a concentrated food and so many tons would take away the appearance of lightness of which the Presi- dent speaks. President Hoffman — I know oil meal is a very rich food, but the amount I have named was distributed over the whole win- ter, with a large herd, while all the other kinds of feed were what are commonly called light. 160 Mr. James McCann — I have fed turnips to steers, and I regard them as advantageous feed, but not in their fat producing proper- ties. To illustrate, I may say that steers put up in the fall fresh and Juicy from their grass feed will not increase in weight by lib- eral feeds of grain. Six quarts of meal fed to such animals daily up to February will hardly increase weight, although with good hay it will add to growth. I know of a case where a man bought a yoke of cattle which weighed twenty-four hundred when put up in the fall to feed. In February, after hav- ing eaten all the time freely of grain, he brought them to my scales, and they only weighed twenty-four hundred. Now if he had fed turnips, or potatoes, or any other such juicy feed instead of all the grain — that is to say giving off part of the grain and substituting the value in roots, the cattle would no doubt have shown an increase in weight and been even better beef. It is well known that cattle fed all winter on grain wiU not increase more in weight m that time than when turned from such feed t o good grass they will gain in two weeks. Now can any one say if cattle may be fed on corn stalks alone all winter. Mr. Owen. I remember hearing my grand- father say that cattle fed long on corn stalks alone would be injured, and even that such feed continued long enough would kill them. They are harsh, and the butts especially, are woody and indigestible. As to keeping drfferent kinds of cattle herded together I have never had any trou- ble. We usually have twelve or fifteen calves, and sometimes sheep and colts, all feeding together. No bad results have ever appeared. We have also kept oxen with the cows in winter without trouble. The plan of giving variety in the food is good. Hay, stalks and straw are good for the three feeds, giving one feed of each. Some of our farmers seem to prefer feeding but twice a day, but my practice has been to feed three times a day from November to spring. When we go out to milk in the early morning the cattle are aU fed and along before noon they are turned out to drink, after which they are fed again, and then at dark, when all are put up for the night. Nearly all the feeding is done in the stables, and the cows are milked there m winter and summer. Even the corn stalks are fed in the stables, the only inconvenience being that they make the manure a little unpleasant to handle ; but everything is saved, and I regard it as the best way to feed. For the grain feed buckwheat bran and wheat bran are both good, together or separate, and so is a mix- ture of corn and oats ground together, or corn meal mixed with brans. For hoVses I think two bushels of oats and one of corn mixed and ground are excellent, better than corn alone. At present X am feeding my horses corn in the ear, nine or ten ears a day, with very little work, not be- cause it is the best feed but because by accident I happen to have the corn. I did not attend the last meeting, but I have heard that stables were freely discuss- ed, especially stanchions. After many years use of stanchions I am free to say that I think it quite safe for cattle to stand in them twenty out of the twenty-four hours of every day in winter. I never had any trouble from their use, nor any injury to the cattle by being confined in them. They may easily be constructed so as to be used with comfort to the animals and profit to the own- er. The bottom rail should be very narrow, so that it will not impede respiration when the cattle are lying with their necks across it. And I have noticed that when used for cows it is essential that the upright piece on the right side (the side on which milking is done) should be very nar- row, so that the cow may see when the milker approaches. It is just as well not to be kicked, and this little precaution will save much of the risk. The platform on which the cow s stand should be j ust about five feet in length and then a drop, no gutter. It is easy to keep the stables clean by such an arrange- m«nt and there is greater ease in placing the cattle in the stanchions in the absence of a deep gutter.