C41 S 521.C61^°'"*" ""'■"^'•'"V Library «;;!lKSS^:J!;e^:^'^eeagricu/,ura 3 1924 000 951 370 ^'taAJL h/V^ ^Aw^ip^' LU < < < < DC H o CO < C/) > LJ LLl LU THE WEEKLY WITNESS ; THE FARMERS' PAPER. THE '^MONTREAL WITNESS" IFI^/EIHl AGRICULTURAL LECTURES REV. W. F. CLARKE. Jro. /. THE NOBILITY OF AGRICULTURE: Delivered at the Ontario School of Agriculture, Guelph, Monday, lAth October, 1878. montreal : John Dougall & Son. 1878. ONLY $1.10 PER ANNUM IN ADVANCE. DO Additional copies of this and subsequent Lectures by Mr . Claeke will be sent to any address on receipt of a ONE CENT POSTAGE STAMP. In ordering state hew many copies are wanted for DISTRIBUTION. FOB 18'3^@^ We have to note little progress during the pist J ear, as will appear from the following figures:— Sept., 187P. '^fpt., 1877. Daily Witness 14,580 15,000 "Weekly Witness.... 21^,300 23,500 NoETHEKN Mbssenges 46,400 47,500 L'AuEOEE 850 800 80,130 86,800 Better times are, however, dawning for the country, and we look for growth in propor- tion. We ask for the help of all lovers of wholesome literature in bringing about such growth. The Weekly Witness has now been at work for thirty-two years, through good 1 eport and through evil report. The Daily Witness has been in operation eighteen years ; and the JSTobtheen Messbngeb thir- teen years ; the Ausoee thirteen years, al- though only one under the present publishers, bhe New Dominion Monthly twelve years. The advertising busineES has not grown with rapid stricea as irt former years, and the year has been one of necessary economy and qniet. The year has been uneventful. The principal matter of note in connection with the history of our publications has been the receipt from the Committee of the Witness Testimonial Fond of a considerable sum of money towards the pur- chase of our great eight-cylinder press, which is being duly inscribed in memory of so important and interesting an event. The most important announcement we have to make for the oeming season is to be found below. WITNESS LECTURES ON AGKICXJL- TXJKE. The publishers of the Witness have of late been strongly impressed with the idea that Canada has reached that stage in her agricultu- raldevelopment when the country is ripe for very considerable improvements in her farming cus- toms. Our best farmers have come to realize that the culture which has served iu the X'ast will not serve in the future. Agricultural science— the application of mind to matter — is what is needed. Agricultural colleges are abundant in many parts of Europe, and in countries of which we know almost nothing a large proportion of the farmers have had thorough scientific train- ing, and expensive works and journals are found in nearly every farm-house. The next genera- lion of Canadian farmers must be of this class. Those who cannot attain to education will fall behind in the race. The great majority may easily be educated farmers if they choose. There is already one agricultural college in each province. If they were properly appreciated there would be one in each county. The publishers of the Witness have during the past few weeks been made the recipients of a munificent donation from the people of Canada, and have conceived the plan oi mailing some re- turn to the country by the establishment of a winter course of " witness" eeee leotuebs on agkicoltdke, with the object of enlisting the zeal of in- telligent farmers in the diffusion of agricul- tural knowledge among their fellow-agricultur- ists. To that end they are fortunate in having secured the services of the most popular and best known agricultioral writer and speaker in Canada, MK. W. r. CLARKE, OE LINDENBANK, GUELPH, formerly editor of the Canada Farmer and of the Ontario Farmer, who will lecture be- ginning about October first, in such parts of the country as may offer him the best openings. We should be glad if it were pos- sible to cover the whole country'with such a course, but ss concentration is necessary to ef- ficiency, he will probably work out from two or three centres in Quebec and Ontario, trying to leave behind him wherever he goes some perma- nent result in the shape of organization for mutual improvement among the farmers in the various localities he may visit. AU who would like to have such lectures delivered in their neighborhoods are requested to write at once to the undersigned, when the possibility of fulfilling the request'Will bo immediately considered. We would not have it thought that this plan is intended to be a diversion of the generous gift of the subscribers to the Testimonial Eund from its original intent of establishing the Witness enterprise, as we are in the hope that Mr. Clarke's tour will not iu the long run prove a loss to the Witness, but that on the contrary it will do much to establish the paper as the farmer's paper throughout the Dominion. We shall expect our friends who invite the visit of the Witness lecturer to make the neces- sary local arrangements in the way of hall or other public building, fire and lights, which we are quite sure they wiU do very cheerfully. John Douoall & Son, Montreal. THE NOBILITY OP AGRICULTURE. INAUGURAL WITNESS LECTURE BY REV. W. F. CLARKE, BEFORE THE ON- TARIO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, GUELPH. OnMonday evening, October 14th, the first of the series of lectures on" Agrioulfure," arrang- ed through the enterprise of the publishers of the Montreal Witness, was delivered at the On- tario School of Agriculture, Guelphjby the Rev. "W. F. Clarke. Besides the whole of the officers and students of the school,there was a represen- tation of the farmers of the neighborhood. From beginning to end the lecture was listened to with marked interest, and as the speaker made happy hits at intervals he was loudly ap- plauded. Mr. Wm. Johnston, President, occupied the chair, and in introducing the lecturer, stated that it afforded him a great deal of pleasure in having the inaugural address of the series delivered at the College. His feelings in this respect no doubt were shared by the other officers of the institution. He believed that the enterprise manifested by the publishers of the newspaper, in giving to the farmers of this country a series of free lectures on agricul- ture, would oommead itself to the farming community. There was no person more emi- nently fitted to undertake the task of a lectur- ing tour than the Rev. W. F. Clarke, whom he now had pleasure in introducing to the audience. Mr. Clarke was received with applause. He statedthatonhis ownbehalf as well as thatof the Montreal Witness, whose enterprise originated the series of lectures now to begin, he thanked the President of the Ontario School of Agri- culture for the courteous permission to deliver his first lecture in the class-ioom of the insti- tution. The speaker stated that it would en- courage and help him not a little to go forth with the sympathies and benedictions of the officers and students of the School of Agricul- ture. Their patronage would commend him and his work to the farmers of Canada, and pave the way for an appreciative reception in every neighborhood which he might visit. It was fitting on many accounts that the lectures should begin here, and more especially because this institution inspired the idea that led to their being undertaken. A communication addressed by the lecturer to the editor of the Montreal Witness, which appeared ifi that journal in July last, contains the germ of the enterprise. The lecturer then read that por- tion of the communication which referred particularly to the subject under consideration. It first pointed out the necessity of bringing science to bear on field work with the view to keeping up the fertility of their lands. That Canada suffers incalculable loss from the ig- norance of her farmers as to the properties of the soil they work and the requirements of the crops they would raise, it would be futile to deny. A thorough course of agricultural study at college only'pabtially met the case. This would provide for coming generations, but what of the present ? What was wanted was a remedy that would begin to tell on the working force now in the field. If farmers could be stirred up to read many excellent periodicals and works on agriculture with which the press at the present day teems, we might hope to see the dawn of a better day. With a liberal supply of agricultural period- icals and books, there is no good reason why every country home should not he in the win- ter time a, miniature Agricultural College. This was the time when improved plans of husbandry might be laid for the coming spring. There are one or two means that might be tried to stir- the spirit of improvement. A racy, popular lecture on the condition and wants of our agriculture, delivered in every school section, could not fail to do good. An- other expedient for getting at the popular mind has been resorted to with much success in the United States. It was that of holding agricultural conventions, at which various topics are introduced by prepared papers or- The Nobility of Agriculture. addresses, and discussed by the audience. Our dairy associations are of this character, only they are devoted to a specialty. A begummg might be made by agricultural societies de- voting a day to farm discussion instead of sim- ply meeting to hear the annual report and ileot officers. Short course agricultural col- leges, on the same principle as the commercial colleges, was another expedient. It would be much better than nothing, notwithstanding the fact that not much beyond putting the mind on the right track could be done. The speaker then went on to state that in pur- suance of the views emmoiated in the fore- going communication it would be his present object to show the importance— the absolute necessity — of AN EABNEST CBTTBADE in the direction of agricultural improvement. Krst, from the state of things, industrially and socially, not only in this country, but through- out the civilized world at the present time. Newspapers teem with accounts of skilled mechanics out of work ; of destitution not only among poor people but among those known as the middle class. The condition of the old country was depicted by the speaker. He held it was not entirely the result cf commer- cial despreseion. It existed before the present siege of hard times commenced. It arises partly from the natural increase of population leading to a disproportionate multiplication of consumers as compared with producers. That the prevailing destitution is not wholly caused by the stringency of the times is evident from the fact that it cropped out pretty plainly when times were better. There was a jostling and crowding of professional gentlemen to such an extent that even more than average ability failed in many cases to achieve suc- cess. Even superior ability notoriously goes a begging nowadays. Everywhere there are too many professional men, too many persons whose aim is to live by their wits. To come down to business walks of life, it is patent to all that there is an overproduction of salesmen, book-keepers and clerks. Much is heard of the balance of power in Europe as influencing diplomacy and dictating peace or war. There is a balance of power in society at large and a point at which production is insufficient to meet consumption. There are too many hun- gry mouths, and there is too little food to fill them. There are too many naked backs and not enough clothing to put on them. So on through the entire circle of human wants. What we call the necessaries of life obtain ready sale. If a man has wheat, or fat cattle, or wool, or dairy products, there is no trouble in turning them into money and making them a means of supplying income. It comes to this, that agriculture is the only source of wealth, and that more producers are wanted. "The profit of the earth is for all ; even the king is served by the fruit of the field." There are illimitable stretches of fertile land awaiting culture, and so long as this is the case there is a remedy at hapd for destitution, wherever found. Why is not the remedy taken hold of ? Because human pride is mightier than human necessity. There is a prejudice against that occupation on which all men are dependent, and on which the whole fabric of society rests. It is looked upon as vulgar and ungenteel to labor with the hands even in that calling to which not ordinary people merely, but royalty itself must look for daily bread. It is not rational to expect an effectual cure for the wide-spread evil under consideration unless we go down to its roots and eradicate that. As with fighting the Canada thistle, aU chop- ing and hacking of the shoots andleaves only tends to incjeaae the pest, while nothing but the eradioa1»on of the roots amounts to a cure. So with this pestiferous idea, which has spread itself MKE A NETWOEK: AI.L OVEE SOOtETT. It must be beaten into that dull scholar, the public, that all honest labor is respectable, while it is the meanest of things to sponge foi daUy bread and play the hypocrite for the sake of maintaining a respectable appearance. If it be true that the state of things now prevalent all over the civilized world is largely due to a disturbed equilibrium of the industrial forces, as the result of which the consumers outnum- ber the producers, and that the stringency of the times is in reality an effort of the body politic to restore the balance of power in the social system, then it follows most conclusive- ly that the only remedy is increase of produc- tion. Dire necessity will force non-producers to leave the towns and cities into which they have crowded. They must seek " fresh fields and pastures new" in the country. Since they cannot buy food and clothing, they must go to work and produce them. There is and can be no other solution of the difficulty. What is true of people who have been filling situations with sbiaU salaries is equally true of artisans andlaborers. Manufacture is over- done, and there must be more production. All the world over, labor-saving devices have mul- tiplied to such an extent that an outlet is de- manded for labor, both skilled and unskilled. There is an over-abundance of it, for which new scope is required. That new scope is in reality the old scope, to which there must be a vigorous and willing return. " Machinery will never starve the farmer.'" Men may be driven from mechanical pursuits, but they can al- ways find room to work on the soil. On this continent where there is ample opportunity to obtain land, in small or large quantites, the unemployed need never be at a loss for some- thing to do that will put food into their mouths and clothing on their backs. If they cannot earn money with which to buy the necessaries of life, they can do what will serve their turn equally well, and that of society far better — go to work and produce what they want. HEEEIN LIES THE CUBE FOE THE TEOTTBLES that afflict the industrial classes. It is pro- duction that is wanted, the creation of more wealth, to meet the world's need. The farmer The Nobility of Agricui.turf,. 5 is a sort of creator. Agriculture is the only source of wealth. There must be a broader basis made for the social superstructure. It is top-heavy, and needs buttressing with the im- plements of husbandry. Two acres of land will support in comfort a Dutch or Belgian family. John Chinaman is rich on a single acre or less. In France every family has its little homestead, and no business changes can effect the prosperity of the great mass of the working people. It is better to be a small landholder than a pinched mechanic, or half- idle laborer. In the suburbs of aU our towns and cities there are great expanses of unoccu- pied land which the owners would be glad to let for the payment of taxes, or ^ell on long time. Why on earth cannot people who have nothing to do get hold of these waste places, and make productive gardens of them p Able- bodied men let the spade and hoe lie unused at their feet, and go about moping and starving. The fact is, nothing is so generous as the soil ; nothing repays with such liberal profusion the labor you bestow upon it. Ton give Mother Earth of your scanty measure, and she flings back to you from her bountiful stores a thou- sand fold. The late Horace Greeley advised the young men to "Go West." The speaker didn't care whether you went west or east, north or south, or stay where you are, but if you are hard up and don't know what to do for a living, GET A BIT OF LAND, work it well, and you will not toil for nothing. If a little garden patch on the edge of your town or city is too scrimpt-up a domain for your ambition, push out into the country and " bite bigger." Begin with spade husbandry. By-and-bye you will be able to run a plough. He should like to see a generation of little farmers spring up out of the debris of these hard times. With generous manuring and high culture great crops may be harvested from very limited acres. And this, be it re- membered, is literally " making money." It is going to the fountain-head, and tapping the springs of wealth at their source. This is not fictitious, but real and actual gain. There is one moral taught by all this, from which there is no getting away. It is, that those al- ready located on farms and able to make a living off them had better stay where they are. With so many idle people in towns and cities — idle not from choice but from necessity — idle because they have absolutely nothing to do — is it not downright insanity for hale and hear- ty young fellows to abandon the farm ? In the second place, he argued in favor of efforts to educate our people agriculturally, from the claims of farming as an occupation. Two VEET OPPOSITE OPINIONS are widely prevalent in regard to farming as an occupation : the one that it is eminently desirable, and the other that it is well-nigh detestable. The high estimate of farming just alluded to is formed extensively by people pf education and culture, by professional men. merchants, and those whose duties confine them to the town or city. Here and there you find a practical farmer who thinks thus highly of his calling, though it must be con- fessed that enthusiasm in regard to their vo- cation is rarer among farmers than among other classes of persons. Whatever may be the cause, it is, to say the least, unfortunate that farming should be in better repute among those not engaged in it than among those who are compelled, in too many cases, against their will, to follow it as a business. What are the grounds on which the favorable estimate of farming is based ? Are they substantial or il- lusory ? Let us investigate them somewhat. Its admirers regard and speak of agriculture as a healthful, independent and safe occupa- tion ; preferable to the in-door confinement, anxiety and uncertainty of commerce and the professions ; bringing those who pursue it into every day contact with nature, and with those scenes of the external world which mankind by common consent are wont to delight in. Is not all this true ? And can as much be said in so few words concerning any other human occupation ? It will doubtless be urged in re- ply that aU this is the bright side of the farm- er's life, and that it is not without its draw- backs and diificulties. Granted : but every earthly condition that can be pictured has a dark background, while it will be hard to find another that has Unes of equal brightness in the foreground. Admitting, for argument's sake, that THE HIGH BBTIMATE OE AGEIOTJLTDBE is correct, how is it that so many farmers do not have it P Firstly, because discontent with our own lot and envy of that of others is among the commonest besetments of human- ity. Secondly, because farmers and their families know but little of the real circum- stances of town and city people, and are es- pecially ignorant of the toils, worries, priva- tions and hardships connected with business and the professions. Thirdly, because the rural population has not been educated up to an ap- preciation of the beautiful in nature. This is often his misfortune more than it is his fault. His life has been one monotonous plod. He has been too much of an earth-worm and a drudge. What philosophers would call the festhetical part of his nature is undeveloped. " 'Tis pity, but pity 'tis, 'tis true." There are not wanting signal exceptions to all this. Many farmers, and their number is constantly on the increase, appreciate their calling as highly as any who look wistfully at it from a distance, and would hardly change places with a prince on his throne. There are others who, in the absence of any gushing en- thusiasm, see ample reason for contentment with their lot. But it is time to glance at the low estimate of farming as an occupation, to which reference was made at the outset of this lecture. On what grounds is that attempted to be justified ? That it is a slavish life ; that it is not genteel ; that it does not pay ; that its associations are low, coarse and unrefined. The Nobility of Agriculture. Let us examine these characterizations a little in detail. No doubt farming is a laborious employment, but so are aU others that are "worth ;^rosecutiag. Many have no idea of any toil except that of the muscle. But brain ■work is far more fatiguing and exhausting. Toil is a common lot of humanity, and its happy lot, for the truest enjoyment is ever found in constant useful, profitable employ- ment. None of earth's prizes are to be won by the avoidance of work. Labor, downright labor, is the price of success in every pursuit. And while the farmer's toil is wholesome, sleep-inducing, invigorating, improved atipli- ances are constantly being invented to take the drudgery more and more out of it. This cannot be said of business or professional pur- suits. No horse-power machinery can be had to supersede the hard thinking or the inces- sant worrying of merchants, lawyers, doctors, editors, and all those classes whose occupations demand the constant exercise of brain power. That EAEMIITO IS NOT GENTEEL IS OONTEADICTED by incontrovertible facts. In Great Britain it is the most aristocratic of pursuits ; princes, lords, first "commoners," and the cream of the gentry are farmers. But it is alleged that farming does not pay. "Wto aflirm this ? Poor farmers who do not understand their business, or push it with energy, men who would not succeed in making money elsewhere any better than they do on the farm ; and covetous farmers, who are not satisfied with the "slow and sure" gains of honest, persever- ing industry, but are dazzled by deceitful visions of fortunes made by lucky speculation. Taking the average of those who follow farming, it is more steadily remunerative that any other calling. How seldom is a farmer's name found in a list of insolvents ! In how many deplorable instances have we beheld farmers who were doing well, but ached to do better, sell their farms, embark in business, and in a very brief space become bankrupts ? Slovenly, careless, unthrifty, brainless farm- ing does not pay ; but the same characteris- tics and habits that succeed elsewhere are oven more certain to pay on the field of agri- culture than on any other. Kural homes are too often lackmg in beauty and attractiveness. Some farmers, it must be owned, have a con- tempt for these things, which they are fond of displaying whenever opportunity offers. Pew of them have anything like a library. It is only here and there that a farmhouse has beautiful and attractive surroundings. Too many families in the country are willing to live in the kitchen , keeping the best portion of the dwelling shut up except on occasion of a wed- ding or a funeral. But their occupation is not responsible for this lack of inteUigenoe, polish- ed manners, and good taste. There are no manners and good taste. There is no class of our people who have eO MANY EESOtTEOBS WITHIN THEMSELVES for making home pleasant and home life delightful as farmers. In the third place the speaker argued for a more widespread agricul- tural eduction, because of the importance of science in farming. The speaker held that there was not much wonder that the untutor- ed backwoodsman should have a prejudice against science in fanning ; but that repre- sentatives of the people in Parliamentassembled should be afraid that oar young men would get too much theory schooled into them, and be thereby unfitted to make good farmers, may surely be ranked as one of the wonders of the age . Almost the only tangible obj ection raised against the School of Agriculture by our re- presentatives was that it gives too much theo- retical instruction. It is high time this bub- ble were pricked and the wind let out of it, whether it be found sailing aloft along our con- cession lines or floating around the heads of legislators in parliamentary halls. Many years ago it was quite the fashion in certain quarters to decry theory in connection with agriculture, but we supposed that day was past for ever, until we were undeceived by the waking up of our legislative Rip Van Winkles, and their loud outcry against the danger that menaced the country from this source. Now, what is theory ? Is it not a statement of the principles according to which any effect is pro- duced ; in other words, a recognition of those unchangeable laws by which the universe is governed ' THEOEY la A3 NEOESSAEY TO THE FAEMEB who grows a bushel of wheat as it is to the mechanic who builds the mill in which the wheat is ground. The great mistake is that of supposing theory and practice to be hostile to each other, while the truth is theory should guide practice, and practice conform itself to theory. Generally speaking the farmer is a mere manual laborer. He works according to a few simple traditional rules. Certain modes of culture have been f jund by experience to bring about certain results. But he oantiot explain the why and the wherefore of them. He cannot show why it is and must be as ex- perience has demonstrated. Hence he go:!S about his work mechanically rather than in- telligently, and finds it more of a task than a pleasure. To know the reasons of things, to be versed in the principles of agricult;are, would convert drudgery into an enthusiastic observation of Nature, and lend a charm to an otherwise tedious occupation. It is not per- haps to be wondered at that so few farmers are versed in the theory of their business when it is remembered that "it is only very lately that agriculture could claim to have been reduced to a system. It was only in the early part of the present century that chemistry was first applied to farming, and there are patriarchs now living who have witnessed the birth of agricultural chemistry as they have the dis- covery of steam and the invention of railroads. The farmer who would be up with the times must be a book-farmer. He must farm by the book. It is quite true that readinsr alone wiH not make a man a good farmer, Ther« The Nobility of Agriculture. IB A PRAOTIOAL PAST which must be learnt on the farm itself. It requires an exercise of judgment only to be had by experience, to adapt principles to Tary- ing oircumstdnoes of soil and climates. The farmer's aim should be to raise the largept possible crops at the least possible cost, espe- cially shunning that cost which comes from in- flictmg injury on the soil. What the soil con- tains is ms stock-in-trade, and he must keep that up or his business will soon go to the dogs. In conclusion the lecturer plead for the use of all available means to diSuse agricultural in- formation in view of the characteristics and warts of Canadian farming. While the general rules that govern agriculture are the same all the world over, every country has a husbandry peculiar to itself. Its character becomes mould- ed and fixed by the force of ciicumstances. There is a certain adaptation about it, and in the study of that adaptation the secret of success is to be foimd. The MOST CONSPICUOUS AND STEIKINO PEATDUE of Canadian farming is the newness of the country which forms its field of operation. In many localities the " oldest inhabitant " re- members when the first tree was felled and the light of day let into the primeval wilderness. Then the all-absorbing thought was to make a clearing. There was wholesale tree slaughter. Kelds and farm steadings were laid bare and left unsheltered. The country was laid open to the sweep of fierce winds. A lessened rain- fall,' and our almost chronic summer droughts, had been caused by a too indiscriminate des- truction of the woods and forests. The ex- posed condition of the country had rendered the growth of fall wheat uncertain and unpro- fitable in many districts. The eaxly settlers found a soil of astonishing fertility. This they cropped and cropped again, with the most exhaustive products, neglecting to return to the land by timely manuring, the wealth ab- stracted by abundant harvests. Dire necessity had something to do with this. With their farms to pay for, their families to keep, their stock, tools, and implements to buy, it was not so surprising that they drew upon the virgin soU to the utmost extent possible. But ignor- ance, as well as necessity ,prompted their course of procedure. A restoration of tree growths was now loudly called for. The highways needed to be avenued with trees, groves plant- ed around f ana-steadings ; and the fields belted with rows of evergreens. EESTOBATION OF LOST EEETILITT is another urgent want o^Canadian agriculture. A system to which the late Baron Liebig severely but correctly gave the name of " spo- liation" has been pursued to well nigh its uttermost limit. As a natural result of it, the impression is widely prevalent that farming does not pay ! Alas, for " our bleeding country " if this be so. Agriculture must be the basis of our national prosperity, if we are to have any. Unless we can make farming pay the country will drift into bankruptcy without help or hope. The old system of improvident, exhaustive tillage, that is ever drawing on the resources of the soil, without paying anything back win not pay. It is like drawing cheques incessantly on a bank account without making any cash deposits ; the result, "no funds." Stock raising and cattle feeding must be gone into more extensively. " No stock, no manure ; no manure, no crops." The opening which now presents for the shipment of our fat cattle and sheep to Britain, and their sale at paying prices there, is most opportune in view of our agricultural condition. There need be no fear of over-production, with such a market accessible. In some districts where a too exclusive course of grain growing was formerly pursued, the farmers have taken tO' root culture and stock raising with the best results. In others grass growing and dairying are working a welcome change for the better. What is needed is that the whole country should awake to the imperative necessity of recuperating the soU. Bettor farming is loudly demanded. If THEEB IS TO BE BETTEE FAEMINO, there must be better farmers. Those who till the soil must become educated, not in a general way alone, but in the specialties of their vocav tion. Farming is a business, and men require to be educated and qualified for it just as for every other business. Even if a farmer's early education has been but scant, there is abundant help for him in the teeming issues of the press. "Head and you will know" is an unfailing talisman. Let him study and master the prin- ciples of his noble calling ; let him emulate the example of thS most successful tillers of the soil ; let him farm with brains as well as mus- cle, and he will achieve results of which he little dreams at present. He will make two blades of grass grow where only one grew be- fore, and take rank among the benefactors of his race. He will prove himself a true patriot, and be held in grateful remembrance, when thousands of blatant politicians are deservedly forgotten. At the conclusion of the address, of which the above is a bare outline, it was moved by Prof. Brown, seconded by Prof. Fanton, " That a hearty vote of thanks be tendered to the lec- turer, Rev. W. F. Clarke, for the able and in- structive lecture just delivered; and through him to the proprietors of the Montreal Witness for thus giving us the opportunity of enjoyiug a privilege rarely offered — listening to a lec- ture upon agricultural subjects from one of the ablest exponents of those subjects in Canada." President Johnston expressed his hearty approval of the resolution before putting it to- the meeting. It was carried amidst great ap- plause. — Guelph Mercury. i '^ THE DAILY AND WEEKLY WITNESS WILL CONTAIN THE TSTHOLE SERIES OF ME. CLARKE'S LECTURES ON AGRICULTTJUE. ALL PERSONS who desire to keep well informed on AGEICULTUBAL SUB JECTS in their Tarious departments, on subjects of vital intekest to the COWTRT, ol tne i\EWb at Home and Abkoad, and who wish to read that which will have a tendency to cultivate a desire for, and strengthen, principles of Eeligion and Tbmpekance, ^ W can find their object greatly aided in its attainment by reading the Montkeal g g "Witness. The history and career of this paper is well known and its success W S has been considered one of the marvels of the age. Any who desire to work to a t3 secure its greater circulation can do so at a profit to themselves by obtaining P» 5 subscriptions to it, or the other Witness publications. This is a work not only tj H pleasant to those who engage in it, but which wiU obtain for them the thanks of K 3 those whom their influence causes to take any of these papers. This has been ^ < the UNIVEKSAL experience of the workers for the Witness and its sister papers. fl ^ Cash commissions are given for subscriptions and prizes, and the following offers g o are also made : — W 2 New subscribers for a year to any of the Witness publications, -a list of co § which is given below,— will receive the paper to which they subscribe FREE to ;> t3 the pnd of this year, so that any persons now subscribing will get their papers !^ g from the time they subscribe to the first of January, 1880, for one price. « § Any person sending us FOUK new subscribers to the Weekly Witness, at ^ EQ $1.10 each, will get an extra copy for one year. W H Any person sending us one new subscriber to the Weekly Witness wiU ^ g receive a copy of the Northern Messenger FEEE for one year. S < A special offer is made to Sunday-schools. To any Sunday-school that does ^ S3 not now take the Northern Messenger, we will send free to the end of this year ^ ■ a package containing a sufBcient number of papers to supply one to each family. P § All instructions necessary to begin this work will be sent on application to the publishers. Theprize list may be found in any copy of the Weekly Witness. § a EVEEY LETTEE AN3WEEBD. a < H E-l > g 3 ^ -^^ f2 S HOW A NEWSPAPER IS MADE. g m H A highly interesting account of the manufacture of a Daily Newspaper, " ^ reprinted from the New Dominion Monthly, has been issued by the Publishers, ^ _ and will be sent free to any address on receipt of a One Cent Stamp. This is a g 1^ subject every one is interested in. Address at once, before the issue has been H < exhausted. 5 g JOHN DOUGALL & SON. Montreal. g m ' _ « 3 H -».^^* =5 9 The Witness Publications, S ^ Montreal Daily Witness, price, post paid, $3.00 cirou&tion 14,951 ■ Montreal Weekly Witness, 1.10 " 26,300 L'Aurore, (French, lUus.), 1.00 " 850 Northern Messenger, (Illus.), 30c. " 46,400 THE DAILY AND WEEKLY WITNESS TO JANUARY 1st, 1880, FOE ONE YEAR'S SUBSCRIPTION. THE WEEKLY WITNESS ; THE FARMERS' PAPER, THE "MONTREAL WITNESS" AGRICULTURAL LECTURES BY REV. W. F. CLARKE. Jro. ^. ORGANIZATION AMONG FARMERS; Delivered at Lachute, Argenteuil County, Quebec, on Monday Evening, February Srd, 187 9, by the Rev. W. F. Clarke. montreal : John Dougall & Son. 1879. ONLY $1.10 PER ANNUM IN ADVANCE. Additional copies of this and subsequent Lectures by Mr. Clabke will be sent to any address on receipt of a ONE CENT POSTAGE STAMP. In ordering state how many copies are wanted for DISTRIBUTION. J^poS^e^kiA jm- the "lYi^n^" 3^iMmiMon^ We have to note little progress during the past year, as will appear from the following agures:— ggpt., isyg, Sept., 1877. Daily Witness 14,580 15,000 Weekly WiTNBSS 26,300 23,500 JToetheen MESSEnaBE 46,400 47,500 L' Atjeobe 850 800 80,130 86,800 Better times are, however, dawning for the country, and we look for growth in propor- tdsn. We ask for the help of all lovers of wholesome literature in bringing about such growth. The Weekly Witness has now been at work for thirty-two years, through good report and through evil report. The Daily Witness has been in operation eighteen years ; and the Nobtheen Mebsenoee thir- teen years ; the Aueoee thirteen years, al- though only one under the present publishers. The advertising business has not grown with rapid strices as is former years, and the year bas been one of necessary economy and qaiet. rhe year has been uneventful. The principal matter of note in connection with the history of our publications has been the receipt from the Committee of the Witness Testimonial Fund Df a considerable sum of money towards the pur- chase of our great eight-cylinder press which is being duly inscribed in memory of so 'viu'^ortant a,nd interesting an event. The most important Announcement we have to make for the coming ieason is to be found below. WITNESS LECTURES ON AGRICUI^ TUEE. The publishers of the Witness have of late been strongly impressed with the idea that Canada has reached that stage in her agricultu- ral development when the country is ripe for very considerable improvements in her farming cus- toms. Our best farmers have come to realize that the culture which has served in the past will not serve in the future. Agricultural science— the application of mind to matter — is what is needed. Agricultural colleges are abundant in many parts of Europe, and in countries of which we know almost nothing a large proportion of the farmers have had thorough scientific train- ing, and expensive works and journals are found in nearly every farm-house. The next genera- tion of Canadian farmers must be of this class. Those who cannot attain to education will fall behind in the race. The great majority may easily be educated farmers if they choose. There is already one agricultural college in each province. If they were properly appreciated there would be one in each county. The publishers of the Witness have during the past few weeks been made the recipients of a munificent donation from the people of Canada, and have conceived the plan of making some re- turn to' the country by the establishment of a winter course of " witness" ekee leotceeb on aokicdltuee, with the object of enlisting the zeal of in- telligent farmers in the diffusion of agricul- tural knowledge among their fellow-agricultur- !!; ists. To that end they are fortunate in having secured the services of the most popnlar and best known agricultural writer and speaker in Canada, ME. W. E. OLABKE, Or LIHDBNBANK, OCBLPH, formerly editor of the Canada Farmer and of the Ontario Farmer, who will lecture be- ginning about October first, in such parts of the country as may oiler him the best openings. We should be tjlad if it were pos- sible to cover the whole country *with such a course, but £s concentration is necessary to ef- ficiency, he will probably work out from two or three centres in Quebec and Ontario, trying to leave behind him wherever he goes some perma- nent result in the shape of organization for mutual improvement among the farmers in the various localities he may visit. All who would like to have such lectures delivered in their neighborhoods are requested to write at once to the undersigned, when the possibility of fulfilling the request-will be immediately considered. We would not have it thought that this plan is intended to be a diversion of the generous gift of the subscribers to the Testimonial Pund from its original intent of establishing the Witness enterprise, as we are in the hope that Mr. Clarke's tour will not in the long run prove a loss tu the Witness, but that on the contrary it will do much to establish the paper as the farmer's paper throughout the Dominion. We shall expect our friends who invite the visit of the Witness lecturer to make the neces- sary local arrangements in the way of hall or ' other public building, fire and lights, which we are quite sure they will do very cheerfully. John Douoall & Son, MontreaL ORGANIZATIONS AMONG FARMERS. A WITNESS LECTURE DELIVERED AT LACHUTE, AKGENTEUIL COUNTY, QUEBEC, ON MONDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 3rd, 1879, BY THE REV. W. F. CLARKE. While all other classes of the community are in the habit of banding together in organi- zations of various kinds, farmers are strangely ■prone to stand aloof from eaoh other, as though they had no interests in common, and no need of mutual vo-operation. Of late years there has been a growing couviotion on the part of intelligent agriculturists that this is an evil demanding correction, and strenuous efforts have been made to induce a, better state of things. These efforts have been attended vrith some success, but the great mass of farmers has not yet been reached, and, so far, only a small minority have been induoed to organize. It must be confessed that many look at this matter merely in the light of self-interest, and even then, as the saying is, they " stand in their own light," for it is made a question of self-interest main- ly in regard to dollars and cents. " WHAT WILL BE THE MONKY OAIN OP BZLONCtllta TO i faemee's oeoanization f" is the sole enquiry made by that class, too numerous both among farmers and others, who estimate everything by the dollar standard. Although it can readily be shown that it " pays " in this meanest and lowest senne for farmers to organize, it is impossible to repress an indignant protest agaiaat this contemptible, sordid way of looking at everything. Some of the most precious acquisitions it is possible for human beings to make are not purchasable with money, and some of the noblest objects that appeal to our ambition refuse to be rated at a money valuation. It is often not merely wise, but imperatively necessary, to embark in undertakings that involve pecuniary outlay, and can never be expected to bring a money return. In discussing the subject of organi- zation among farmers, I shall take but little notice of the question of profit and loss in a monetary point of view, dwelling mainly upon considerations of another kind altogether, I plead for organization among fanners, As one means of counteracting THB ISOLATION AND LONELINESS OF FABU LIFE. It is often objected ta agricultural pursuits that they involve, to a certain extent, seclusion from society, and a species of rural exile. The farmer is condemned to a monotonous round of ideas and occupations. There is but little to enliven the dull routine of daily work. This is especially true of the pioneer in a new country, who must necessarily spend a great deal of his time alone. It is not very surpris- ing that he should find this wearisome and even painful, or that entering into the feelings of the poet's lonely islander, he should be ready to exclaim, "O Solitude ! where are the charms That sages have seen in th; face !" In the United States Agricultural Report for 1862, Dr. W. W. Hall calls attention to the large proportion of the inmates of lunatic asylums contributed by the farming com- munity. He seems to consider it an established fact that the farmer is " more liable to in- sanity than the citizen," and in explanation of it says : " This is because the mind will not bear exclusive action on one subject. This is the key to the so frequent cases of insanity and suicide among farmers ; their subjects of thought are too few ; their life is a ruinous routine ; there is a sameness and a. tameneas about it, — a paucity of. subjects for contem- plation, most dangerous to mental integrity." Dr. Hall adds, and his words are worthy of being deeply pondered : " It is too much the case with our farming population that they have no breadth of view ; they cannot sustain a conversation beyond a few comments on the weather, the crops, the markets, and the neighborhood nflws. And it is worthy of note that their remarks on these subjects are uni- formly of the complaining and unhopeful kind, as if their occupation and their thoughts were on the same low and depressing level. This is Organization Among Farmers. because the mind is not used enough ; is not waked up by a lively interest in a sufficient variety^ of subj sots to promote a healthful tone. The proper and the all-powerful remedy against the sad effects of a plodding, routine existence,is a higher standard of general intelli- gence and a livelier attention to what is too often derisively styled ' book-farming.' The highest form of human health i$ found in those who exercise the brain and the body in some- thing Uke equal proportions." That farm-life is more isolated, lonely and monotonous than it need to be, will be mani- fest on a little reflection. There is, to begin with, the absurd custom of BBi^TINQ FASM-BUXLIIIIiaB i. I/ONO DIBIAiraE EAC£ FBOU TEE PUBLIC BOAD. Referring to this point in one of my lectures, I asked. Why do farmers generally build their houses so far from the highway ? A sharp- witted youngster present, thinking that the question ought to be answered, exclaimed : " To keep our hens from scratching in our neighbors' gardens." The only serious reason I can imagine for the custom under con- bideration, is the convenience of having the bmldings nearer to the centre and rear of the farm ; but when it is remembered how much oftener we have occasion to go to the public road than we do to the rear of our lots, it will be seen that this reason has not much force in it. Life on the fajnu is rendered much more lonesome by this practice. If farm-houses were built as close to the highway as dwellings are usually set in town and village streets, friends and neighbors would often call for a few minutes, who would not think of driving a distance of a quarter or half a mile. Even if they did not call in, they might stop for a minute on the road and exchange greetings. A nod of recognition would at any rate be given and received. This would be something. The sight of a new face even, is a pleasant break in the monotony of a lonesome life. Col. Geo. E. Waring, ii.,ia Scribner'a Monthly not long since gave an account of the custom of having farm villages in some parts of con- tinental Europe, and urged the adoption of this plan, so far as practicable, in the United States, as an antidote to the loneliness of country life. In some parts of this Province of Quebec the farms are laid out long and narrow, so that the houses of the habitants present the appearance of a continuous village street. There are, however, grave objections to having farms laid out in long, narrow strips. But, if nothing else can be done, we can build our houses near enough to the high- way to render calling easy and recognition practicable, which would be, so far, an improve- ment. INFBEaTJBNOT OF MEETINGS IN THE OOUKTET. The lack of occasions bringing fanners and their families together in public meetings, is another needless feature in the isolation of country life. In towns and villages, there is always something going on to bring the peo- ple together in assemblies of various kinds. In rural neighborhoods, there is but very Uttle of this sort of thing. Even a lecture on agri- culture is a phenomenon in most farming districts. It is plain, therefore, that organi- zation, with its attendant and frequently- recurring meetings, would have a beneficial tendency in counteracting to some extent the isolation and loneliness of farm life. 2. Organization would promote BOOIALITT AKD FBIENDLIKIIBB among farmers. It is a well-known fact that there is not much visiting indulged in by farmers and their families. Exceptions to , this remark may be found in certain localities, but as a general rule, the agrieultural class are unsocial. Want of time to " go-a-visit- ing" is the usual plea, but it is so flimsy and untenable as hardly to deserve a serious an- swer. It is often urged by people who can always find a whole day's time when the circus comes round, and who show, in various ways, that it is not so much a question of time as of disposition. " I ain't no visitor," is a remark often heard among country-folk, and some appear to regard this as a sign of virtue and a streak of goodness. But we have social natures that ought not to be starved, and the cultivation of a neighborly spirit is a public and patriotic duty. " A man that hath friends must show himself friendly." In some parts of the country sociality among farmers is hindered by a certain caste feeling, which sometimes makes very ridiculous mani- festations of itself. When I first went to live in Gruelph, I was surprised to find that some of the farmers in that neighborhood sported the prefix " gentleman." There was " Gentle- man Parker," " Gentleman Jackson," and I don't know how many more. I soon discovered that the rural population were divided into the gentry and the common people. The dis- tinction was very clearly drawn by a lady whom I once heard disdainfully exclaim, when she and her family were alluded to as farmers : " We're not farmers, we are retired gentlefolks." These "retired gentlefolks" will Oily associate with their own class, and occasionally this is divided into higher and lower. In the Township of Adelaide, some years ago, one of these 'retired gentlefolk" was made a magistrate. His newly acquired official dignity lifted him up considerably in his own estimation, and after duly reflecting as to how he should comport himself, he called on his nearest neighbor and said : " Mr. , Her Majesty has been graciously pleased to put me on Her Majesty's Commission of the Peace, and such being the case, it is quite im- possible that our two families should associate together on the same terms of equality as heretofore !" Wherever this feeling prevails it is a great barrier to social interchanges. Mr. Spurgeou says : " In England a shilling will not speak to a sixpence ; a sixpence will not Organization Among Farmers. speak to a penny ; and a penny will not speak to a half-penny." I do not propose to discuss the question of rank, but would say, in passing, that I heart- ily endorse that sentiment of the poet Bums in one of the noblest of his songs : — "Tbe ratk is but tlie guinea stamp The man's tie gowd for a' that," It would not be easy to find a prouder or a more honest claim to social distinction than that which results from being " A LOED or THE SOIL." A lady in the Province of Quebec, in writing a letter of grateful appreciation in regard to this course of lectures, makes the following remarks on this point : — " Some time ago, in a conversation with a gentleman, I enquired for the father of a young clergyman I knew, saying " he must be a gentleman." "No, he is a farmer," was the reply. This cut me, and set me thinking. WeU, Mr. Clarke, am I right in believing in farmer princes and princesses? Where do " merchant princes " take their pedigrees ? The farmer's goes up to Abraham, even tOtTob and his sons, who were richer gentlemen than a good many so-called in our cities and country." It must be admitted that many farmers, by their ignorance, contempt of good manners, and general boorishness, have destroyed their claim to be regarded as gentlemen, but this is not the fault of their calling. There is no good reason why farmers and their families should not be " Graced with polished manners and good sense. " Multitudes of them are, and their number is constantly increasing. Organization among farmers will promote this end. It is the avowed design of one of the most influential farmers' organizations on this continent, "to develop a better and higher manhood and womanhood among ourselves ; to enhance the comforts and attractions of oxrr homes, and strengthen our attachment to our pursuits ; to foster mutual understanding and co-opera- tion." Wherever PABMEES' CLUBS AND OBANQES have been instituted, there has been a percep- tible increase of sociality and friendliness. From meeting for business, the transition is natural and easy to meeting for social pur- poses. Most Farmers' Clubs have a yearly fes- tival, while many Granges have two in the year. The JPrairie Farmer, in an article headed "How to make our Granges and Farmers' Clubs attractive," among other suggestions has the following : — " Meet at the houses of members, or other place where the wives and children can go and wish to go, and provide occupation of a pleas- ant kind for them as well as yourselves. Have croquet, music, dancing, and other innocent amusements. Make your meetings socially pleasant." " Make it a point to have some kind of re- freshment. Eating and drinking together always promote good feeling and good fellow- ship, and lend an additional attraction to the gathering, which may be the turning one to some minds, and certainly will drive no one away. The cost is small, and the advantage great." The Northumberland and Durham Division Grange at its recent meeting in Port Hope, adopted a report on this subject strongly urg- ing subordinate Granges to hare a summer and winter festival, also urging the members to get up social entertainments at their own houses, which should include refreshments, music, discussions, and recreations. Another excellent suggestion in this report is that farmers visit more, both for social purposes, and in order to leam whai they can from an inspection of one another's methods of farm management. 3. Organization among farmers will be highly useful in stimulating and guiding AGEICULaUEAL TTVrPBO VEMENT . This is the most important end to be secured by organization. Suppose the farmers in a given locality to be holding frequent meetings at which there is the utmost freedom of dis- cussion, all contributing their quota of infor- mation, experience and opinion; it is plain that a very valuable stock and store of know- ledge will be collected, of which each wUl have the full benefit. In every neighbor- hood there are men who are specially success- ful in some particular branch of husbandry, and it cannot but be a great gain that their methods should become common property. The story even of mistakes and failures is of use to others, and there is not a single farmer, whether successful or unsuccessful, who may not both receive and impart benefit by attend- ing and taking part in meetings of the kind now referred to. Every man knows some- thing of which another is ignorant, and we are always picking up items by reading, ob- servation, travel, and in a variety of ways, that are of value to others as well as to our- selves. Beside the profit of it, there is also the pleasure of sharing our store of knowledge with others. The meal on your table may be plain, possibly scant, but it yields an added satisfaction when you share it with another hungry person. 'The joy of impartatlon is only second to the joy of acquisition. Here and there one finds men have made AGBICDLTUEAL DISCOVEEIES, partly by accident, and partly owing to na- tural shrewdness of intellect, who might have been great benefactors to their fellows if they had been in a position to give publicity to what they have found out. But they had not the education to become authors, or even newspaper correspondents, perhaps ; and there was no organization of farmers in their lo- cality, having its periodical meetings, giv- ing them opportunity to impart the results Organization Among Farmers. of their experiments. Henoe they went on, working away in the solitude of their own farms, benefiting personally by their newly found methods, but doing littU or no good among their neighbors. It is astonishing how little adjacent farmers know of one another's way of managing. If one succeeds better than the other it is his " luck," and so no en- quiry is made for the secret of prosperity. Now all the results of farming are regulated by law ; " there's nae luck aboot the hoose ;" it is all controlled by great, resistless, immuta- ble principles. Hence when a farmer gets along better than his neighbors it ought to set them thinking, enquiring, investigating, imitating. But no, it is his " good luck," and their "bad luck." There the matter is usually allowed to rest. A farmers' club or Grange gives prosperous men a chance to " rise and explain," and if they do not feel in- wardly moved to do this, they can be put into the -witness box and catechized, until the secret of their success is wormed out of them, and becomes THE PEOPBETT OF ALL. I have met with some remarkable cases in the course of my lecture tour, illustrating the truth of these observations, and I will here cite one of the most notable among them. Not far from Oshawa lives a well-to-do and high- ly successful farmer, named Jesse Trull, a lead- ing member of the farmers' club, also of the Grange, for Oshawa can boast of having both these organizations in active operation. I first met Mr. Trull at the meeting of the Dominion Grange in Toronto in December last. After hearing my lecture then and there delivered, he said to me, " Mr. Clarke, that clover talk of yours is what the farmers want. Clover has been the making of me. Tell them about the clover in all your lectures." When in the course of a month afterwards I visited and lectured in Oshawa, I had a fuller opportunity of learning ME. tetjll's expeeibnob dt olovbeino. It is a very interesting story, with a mighty moral to it. In fact, " 'Tis a lesson we should heed," and I hope we shall heed it, all of us. About twelve years ago, Mr. Trull was pass- ing along the road, when a neighbor called to him from an adjacent field. He wanted to consult him about sowing the field. Eight aoi^es of it had been prepared for barley, and there were two acres of clover sod ploughed under, which he thought of sowing to peas, according to the common practice. But the two acres of cloverley looked so mellow and nice that he felt strongly tempted to sow the whole to barley, and it was on the question of doing so or not, that Mr. Trull's opinion was wanted. After inspecting the laud, Mr. Trull remarked that the clover ground looked good enough to grow anything, and advised sow- ing the whole field of ten acres to barley, which was done. AU through the growing season, fke barley on the clover sod looked the most vigorous and thrifty. The yield at harvest was 54 bushels per acre ; far, though I did not learn exactly how far, in advance of the rest of the field. This set Mr. Trull thinking. Why do not things farmers observe set them thinking more . frequently f As he thought, he determined to experiment with clover, and the result was, he found out in effect all that chemistry has to disclose concerning this won- derful plant. He discovered that it is a grand restorer of lost fertility to the soil ; that it more than doubles the manurial resources of a farm, and that its judicious use is the SIJEE WAT TO PEOSPEBOUB AND PATINO HUS- BAHDET. . When he began to be a little " forehnaded," he bought one hundred acres of land, whiohhe paid for by means of olovering. He made it his first business to get fifty acres into clover. The second year he wit a crop of hay, and then got a crop of seed, averaging rather more than two bushels to the acre. Clover seed brought over |8 per bushel that year, and his crop of it, came to upwards of $1,000. Then hehadfiity acres of land in splendid condition for spring wheat, barley, or any other grain. -I am often derided for laying such stress on clovering, as though a species of monomania had got hold of me but, geatlemen, brother farmers, I beg of you try it; Try it as directed in these lec- tures, and if it does not work like a charm, please let the world know its failure through the columns of the Witness. But to return to Mr. TruU, I had the plea- sure of visiting him at his own home, and truly if we have any farmer princes in the country, he is one of them. His house is a beautiful brick villa, and the adjacent barns are models of rural architecture. All the sur- roundings bespeak the reign of competence, if not of wealth. . The enviable proprietor sheuld know the secret of his own success, and I have already given you the key to it. But the point I am seeking to make just now, is this, that if twelve years ago, when Mr. TruU and his neighbor had that bailey field under trial, there had been a farmers' organization in their locality, and this experiment had been made public, watched in its course and noted as to its result; and if, subsequently, Mr. Trull's further trials with clover had been made known at such meetings, there would have been a kindling of interest, a quickening of thought, a multiplying of experimenters, and a wide- spread benefit to the agriculture of the entire region. I could not wish a more forcible ex- ample of the possible good that may come out of MUTUAL nrPEOVEMENT MEETIN08 AMONG FAEMEE3. This example may also serve as an illustra- tion of the manner in which the interest and usefulness of farmers' meetings are to be se- cured. It is by each member doing his part in the way of narrating his own farm experi- ences, whether successful or unsuccessful. The mistake is often made of rendering the Organization Among Farmers. •duties of members unnecessarily formidable, bj requiring the preparation of essays and papers on given subjects. It is well enough that those who are able to do so, prepare com- positions ot this kind, but many who can speak intelligently and to the point, iind difficulty in commiting their ideas to writing. The mechanical process of writing seems to hamper mental action. It is better, therefore, not to exact a task which is only performed with difficulty. Instead of insisting on writ- ten essays and elaborately prepared papers, iet it be understood that free, off-hand, con- versational speeches will be welcome^, and not a little, of the difficulty connected with •sustaining these meetings will disappear. A lack of subjects fit for discussion at these meetings is often felt. This is rather surpris- ing,.for there would seem to be no end of themes appropriate for such occasions. To show how numerous these topics are, and for -convenience of reference and choice, I subjoin the following list of TOPICS FOR ESSAYS, ADDRESSES AND DIS- CUSSIONS : The history of agviontture. JB'arniiiig as au occapa,tiTn, The best agrlcaltaral books. Forests and climate Agricultural meteorolosy. Trees and the rain-fall. Does the moon inflaence vegetation ? Electricity and vegetablegrowth. Origin of soils. Braining land. Tile draining. ' ■ I'all ploughing. . -Clover as a fertiiizor. TTses of plaster of Paris Management of baru-yard manure. Artificial fertilizers. ■ "The best plough for our soil. "Which is the best harrow? 'Cultivators and gang-ploughs. The beat mower and reaper. The best wheat drill The best wind-mill for farm purposes. Arrangement of farm buildings. The bestfaruihouse. The best barn. Boad-makiug. The best fepce. How to make a board fence. Hedging. Feuciug out or fencing, in ' ■ Corn cultare. Wheat-growing. Eye for winter pasture and spring feed. The oat crop. Barley. Trees in fields. Sorghum. Turnip-growing. Beans as a field crop. Pastures and meadows. , Seeding down to grass and clover. Best species of grasses for our climate. Potato culture. How to fight the potato bug. Hoot crops. -Cutting up corn Straw and^corustalks. Kust in wheat. Hessian fiy. .> Army worm. Broom corn How to plant au orchard. Orchard culture. " "When and how to prime. .'Best varieties of apples. Pear blight. Strawberry-growing. Small fruits for the family. Ashes, leached andnnleached. Swamp and pond muck. Layiog out walks and grounds. The soiling system. Farmers' gardens. Beat way lo mauas;e young stock. The most desirable breeds of horses. Mules for farm work. Oxen for farm work. Best i^reed of cattle for this region. Cooperative dairying. Fish culture. Creameries. Managemeot of pigs, Bee-keepiag. Hog cholera. Grape-growing. Management of poultry. How to run a cheese-fae*"or7. "Wool-growiug. Large and small farms. Capital needed to farm well. Day labor or piece labor. Botation of crops. Farm management. Farm aceoants. / Direct trade with coosumer. Transportation in its relation to agriculture. The use and abuse of trade. Taxation of farm property. Tax exemption. Mutual insarauce. Farmers' loan societies and saviags banks. Law and good manners on the road. Amusements in the country. Sociality among farmers. Farmers and the Legislature. Government aid to agriculture. Agriculture and the schools. Protective and revenue tariffs. . How can we improve onr public school system ? Oar municipal institutions. With this list of one hundred topics, and such other subjects aa will from time to time suggest themselves to the officers and members of clubs and granges, there should be no sort of difficulty in having lively, instructive, and entertaining meetings. Only let the member- ship in general do its part, each one feeling a personal responsibility for the efficient work- ing of the institution, and there will be no trouble about sustaining the meetings, and rendering them greatly useful in advancing the interests of agriculture. 4, I argue for organization among farm- ers as A TEAlNING-aCHOOL FOE PT7BLIC LIFE, It id notorious that but few farmers make their way into Parliament. As a class, they are by no means represented in proportion to their number or their Importance as members of the body politic. It is a well-understood principle of Parliamentary representation, that, so far as possible, every class in the popu- lation should be duly represented. If this were carried out, we should have about one hundred farmers in the Dominion Parliament. The precise number of farmers actually in the House I cannot state, but when one hundred and thirty-six members had been gazetted, there were nineteen farmers and forty- one lawyers on the list. Probably the relative proportions of these two classes will not differ greatly from this list when the full number is Organization Among Farmers. classified. The preponderance of lawyers is always a marked feature in our legislatures. If the legal fraternity were represented ac- cording to their proportionate share numeri- cally of the population, they would be entitled to nearly one member of the Dominion House of Commons, say a small-sized lawyer, like Mr. Eykert of St. Catharines, or Speaker Wells, of the Ontario Legislature. Now, why this anomaly in the representation of our people ? What is the reason we do n®t have one hundred farmers, or a decent approxi- mation to that number, in our Dominion Par- liament f It is usually said in explanation of this anomaly that farmers are not sufficiently educated to go to Parliament. This, howererjis a mistake, and a libel on the farming communi- ty. But it must be confessed that farmers, for the most part, do not hare the right kind of education to fit them for Parliament. They have but few opportunities for acquiring the art of public speaking. An art it is, and only to be gained by long practice and great per- severance. It IS often said of poets that they are bom, not made. The reverse of this is true of orators. They are manufactured articles, and it takes no small amount of labor and polishing up to produce a FINISHBn AKD BFFECrrVE PUBHO SPEAKEB. Some of the mightiest orators that ever swayed great assemblies made wretched failures in their first attempts at public speaking. De- mosthenes, the renowned Grecian orator; Robert HaU, the eloquent Baptist divine ; and Lord Beaconsfield, the present Prime Minis- ter of England, are well-known examples of public speakers who at first broke down, but ultimately became distinguished masters of the oratorical art. All who have attempted " maiden speeches," as they are called, mow what peculiar nervous embarrassments crowd upon and overwhelm the would-be orator ; how the well-marshalled ideas take flight, the eye- sight becomes dim, and the speech falters, until the poor victim of a misplaced self-confi- dence sits down in utter confusion and dire dismay. All this is only to be overcome by dint of persevering practice, and farmers, generally speaking, have but few opportuni- ties for it. Meetings of the kind I have bion describing are the very best training-schools that can be had, and will not fail to draw out and improve whatever speaking talent may be possessed by any of the members. But it wUl perhaps be asked, WHY IS IT DESIRABLE THAT FAEMBES SHOITLD GO TO PAELIAMENT ? It ought to be a sufficient reply to this ques- tion, that it is their undoubted right to be there. This cannot be denied, and if they choose to exercise, instead of waiving their right, who shall forbid them P Nor must it be forgotten that rights and duties correspond with each other. Farmers, like all other mem- bers of the community, owe a duty to their country, as good and patriotic citizens, which is not to be discharged by taking and keeping a back seat ; leaving those who are no more en-' titled or able, but only more forward and willing to press their way to the front. There- are some reasons why it is especially impor- tant that the agricultural class should have an. influential representation in Parliament. It- is notorious that our public expenditure is- oontinually becoming more lavish, and that there is great need for applying the brake of economy to the fast-flying train of govern- mental appropriation. Each political party" when out of office accuses the party in power of wasting the people's money, and on the principle that what everybody says must be true, we are bound to believe testimony so- unanimous. Now, farmers have been drilled in the hard school of economy, for no man. can succeed as a farmer who forms and in- dulges expensive habits. If half the member- ship of the House of Commons were farmers- might we not expect that the finances of the country would be managed more economical- ly f If this will not check the progress of ex- travagance we may give it up as a bad job. Moreover, owing to the preponderance of lawyers inParliament,our statutes have become- so technical and complex that it is hardly safe to transact any business of importance^ without EEOOTTESE TO LEdAL ABVtCB. The laws have been framed by lawyers, iik such a manner as to promote their own inter- est. This is not at all surprising in view of the selfish tendencies of human nature. But there is surely no good reason why the bulk of our laws should not be so simply phrased as to be readily understood by people of ordinary intelligence. Why should we be obliged to- fee a lawyer to guide " a coach and four," through the sinuosities and mazes of a statu- tory labyrinth, when the labyrinth can be dispensed with altogether ? A due representa- tion of farmers might reasonably be expected to bring about this kind of " law reform." We should hear less about the codification of our statutes, and more about their simplification. There are also a variety of forms in which legislation is needed for THE PEOTEOTION AND EXPANSION OP THE FABU- INO INTEEEST. For many years past, the current of legislation has been running against agriculture. Thfr tendency has been more and more to fasten the burden of taxation on the real estate of the country, which means, primarily, our farming lands. Our formidable list of tax exemptions are,_ all of them, so many diecriminations- against the farmer. Why should not a sleek, fat, well-paid, if not over-paid official, contri- bute his due share of the cost of the govern- ment that pampers and protects him, as well as the hard-working and frugal farmer P Why should not moneyed men pay iaxes on their mortgages, bonds, and bank stock ? When one- half the members of the House of Commons- belong to that "free and independent yeo- manry" which is so flattered and cajoled at Organization Among Farmers. eleotion times, and so thoroughly ignored at all other times, there will be a mighty revolu- tion in regard to these and kindred matters. Sineourists will go to the right-about. Drones will be driven from the public hive. Officials will have to earn as well as draw their salaries. The burdens of society will be equalized. The best age of the ancient Roman common- wealth will be reproduced. Each citizen will live and labor for the entire State. The good of all win be the aim of each, and we shall behold the poet's beautiful description realized again: "iThe Romans weTo like brothers, In the brave days of old." There is LEQISLAIIOir OF AN AQBICnLinjBAIi OHABACTEB which the country needs, and will be 1 kely to obtain when fanners have their due share of parliamentary representation. Measures di- rectly promotive of the farming interest will be adopted. There wiU be drainage acts ; laws for the regulation of farm leases ; our agricul- tural departments will be made more than mere bureaus; there will be rigorous means used to diffuse agricultural information, to distribute the best seeds, to multiply improved breeds of stock, and in every possible way develop the productive resources of the coun- try. There is nothing selfish in the desire and demand that agriculture should bo thus fos- tered, for every other interest in the country depends on the success of the farmer. It is not legislating for a class merely when legis- lative action is taken for the advancement of agriculture. It is literally seeking " the great- est good of the greatest number," for in pro- portion to the prosperity of the farming interest, will be that of every other throughout the land. In conclusion, it will naturally be expected that I should not only speak of organization in general, but coming down to particulars, refer to ACTUAILT BXIBTINO FAEMBES' OEGANIZATIONS. Of these, there are, so far as I am aware, only two, the Farmers' Club and the Grange. The farmers' club is a time-honored, useful institution, but, unfortunately, does not seem to " take " among the class for whose benefit it is intended. Tou can count on your fingers all the farmers' clubs in the Dominion of Canada. On the contrary, the Grange, though of recent introduction, has gro wn very rapidly, so that within less than five years it has come to number upwards of 700. This of itself wonll seem to indicate that it meets a felt want on the part of the farming community. THE OBANaS nubodies all the features of the club, along vtith others which are peculiar to itself. Chief amcug the latter are the admission of ladies to membership and of&ce, and the representa- tion of the whole order once a year in the Dominion -grange, which is to all intents and purposes A FABMEE e FABLIAUENT. This body centres in itself all the numerical and moral farce comprised in the 700 and more subordinate Granges. The whole organ- ization is spread out over the country like a mighty net- work, by means of which its con- centrated influence can be brought readily to bear on any given point. Such a body is and must be A QEBAT POWBE IN THE LAND. It is widely urged as a strong objection to the Grange, that it embarks in commercial enterprises which are outside its legitimate sphere. Ofl this point there are, however, some erroneous ideas entertained by the outside and general public. It is thought by many that store-keeping is the grand end and object of the Grange ; its main and vital characteristic. This is a great mistake. It is doubtful if store-keeping waa at all contemplated by the founders of the order. Many circumstances appear to indicate that it was an after- thought. The co-operative purchase of implements and seed, also the co-operative sale of farm pro- ducts, were the kind of business enterprises meditated by the first Grangers, and these, most assuredly, are not fairly open to objec- tion. They lie quite within the scope of legi- timate farming operations. QEANOB BIOEB-KEEPINa is, however, a different thing altogether, and in regard to it the members of the order difier greatly in opinion and practice. It cannot be denied that individual farmers, or a whole body of them, have the right to go into mercantile business if they see fit to do so. But the right is one thing, while the wisdom of exercising it is another. There are a large and increasing number of Grangers who disapprove of the store-keeping feature, prin- cipally upon the following grounds ; 1. It is an interference with the laws of trade and with that principle of division of labor on which society is based. We need merchants as well as farmers. Farmers might as well set up to be their own tailors, black- smiths and shoe-makers, as their own store- 2. There is no need to embark in Grange store-keeping for the sake of getting cheap goods, because if the regular merchants are dealt with on the cash system, they will fur- nish articles about as cheaply as they can be got from the wholesale dealer, with costs and charges added. 3. Store-keeping interferes with the more important business of the Grange. Each mem- ber comes with basket on arm, and so much time is consumed in dividing out and parcel- ling up the tea, sugar, and sundries *' too numerous to mention," that useful discussions are out of the question, and instead of the occa- sion being a Grange meeting, it becomes a mere aifair of shopping. 4. These operations have led to much dis- agreement among members of the order, creat- 10 Organization Among Farmers. ing jealousies and even animosities, difficult if not impossible of removal. 5. Store-keeping has excited much prejudice against the G-range, and led to no little ill-will and hard-feeling as between farmers and mer- chants — a state of things very greatly to be deplored. On such grounds as the above, many mem- bers of the order ob j ect to Grange store-keeping, and there is reason to believe IT3 ABAHBONMENT IS ONLY A QUESTION OP TIME. Meanwhile, it should be remembered that no one comes under obligation to deal at a Grange store by reason of joining the orders There is perfect liberty of opinion and action allowed on this point. For my own part, I became a Granger with the distinct understanding that I was opposed to the store-keeping feature, and should use my utmost influence against it. SEOEEST AND BITTJAL OP THE OEAJSaE. g subscriptions to it, or tTie other Witness publications. This is a, work not only t-i H pleasant to those who engage in it, but which will obtain for them the thanks of K 5 those whom their influence causes to take any of these papers. This h-as been j < the universal eiferienoe of the workers for the Witness and its sister papers. g ^ Cash commissions and prizes are given for subscriptions, and the following offers H o are also made : — ^ , g3 Any person sending us rOTTE. new subscribers to the Weekly Witness, at w P4 $1.10 each, will get an extra copy for one year. > B Any person sending us one new subscriber to the Weekly Witness will S „ receive a copy of the Northern Messenger I'KEE for one year. ►^ A special edition of the Northern Messenger, to be called the Northern g Messenger and Sabbath-Sohool Companion for Sabbath-schools preferring it ^ to the Messenger as it is_ at present, will be issued very shortly. It wiU M differ from the ordinary edition in having the third page, now occupied by S Agricultural and Scientific matter, devoted to Sabbath-school matter. It will be under the direction of experieiv:ed Sabbath-school workers, and will contain hints ^ " concerning the management of schools, in addition to reading adapted peculiarly u M to children. The price of the Messenobr is 30 cents a year. The club rates are t< H as follows : — g 1 JOHN DOUGALL & SON, Montreal. a ^ 10 copies to one address S 2.50 a year. S 9 25 ^' " " - 6.50 " H H 50 " " " 11.50 " > g . 100 " " " 22.00 " S ^ AlHnstructionsnecessary to begin this work will be sent on application to the u ►^ publishers. The prize list may be found in any copy of the Weekly Witness. H EVEEY LETTEK OF ENQUIRY ANSWERED. a M HOW A NEWSPAPER IS MADE. I g £ ^ A highly interesting account of the manufacture of a Daily Newspaper, C P reprinted from the New Dominion Monthly, has been issued by the Publishers, a ^ and wiU be sent free to any address on receipt of a One Cent Stamp. This is a 3 < subject every one is interested in. Address at once, before the issue has been § a> exhausted. H jj The Witness Publications. | W :oo= g Montreal Daily Witness, price, post paid, $3.00 circulation 14,951 Montreal Weekly Witness, 1.10 " 26,300 L'Aurore (French, lUus.), - 1.00 " 850 Northern Messenger (lUus.), 30c. " 46,400 THE WITNESS CONTAINS AS MITCH AGEICULTTJRAL MATTER AS A FARMER'S WEEKLY. THE WEEKLY WITNESS ; THE FARMERS' PAPER. THE "MONTREAL WITNESS" AGRICULTURAL LECTURES ■ BY REV. W. F. CLARKE. Jro.