G,ARL' CROW .l){!l)''n4MiJnJi (Cornell Mntuetattij Stbratrg Stljara, NfW fork FROM THE BENNO LOEWY LIBRARY COLLECTED BY BENNO LOEWY 1854-1919 BEQUEATHED TQ CORNELL UNIVERSITY Cornell University Library DS 849.U5C95 Japan and America :a contrast /by Carl C 3 1924 023 233 830 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924023233830 JAPAN AND AMERICA JAPAN AND AMERICA A CONTRAST BY CARL CROW Author of "America and the Philippihes," etc. NEW YORK ROBERT M. McBRIDE & COMPANY 1916 U Copyright, 1916, by RoBEAT M. McBbide & Co. Published February, 1916 CONTENTS CHAPTEB PAGE I Problems of the Pacific 1 II The Real Estate Point of View 8 III Japan's Great Illusion 29 IV Japan's Wondeeful Peogeess 54 V The Cost of Pbogkess 73 VI Dangerous Thoughts 101 VII The Two Japans 121 VIII Points of Contact 148 IX The American Question in Japan .... 172 X What Japan Thinks of Us 200 XI Japan's Aims in China 222 XII The Raid on Tsingtau 252 XIII Japan's Toetuous Diplomacy 272 XIV Is Japan a Menace? 301 JAPAN AND AMERICA JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST CHAPTER I PEOBLEMS OP THE PACIFIC SEPARATED only by an ocean, wMch with the advance in navigation grows narrower each year, are Japan and the United States, two countries which in history, ideals, civilization, culture, have nothing in common. The governments of the two countries represent the extremes of political ideas, the one a de- mocracy, the other an autocracy. So different are the. institutions of the two peoples that neither can without danger to itself adopt the ideals and culture of the other. While the influx of a large number of Japanese to the United States would create new labor problems and seriously threaten American institutions, the migration of a similar number of Americans to Japan would prove equally serious to that country. Japanese, with their lower requirements of living, their lax ideas 1 2 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST of morality, and their deficient political develop- ment, would seriously threaten the survival of American institutions in any community in which they settled in large numbers and acquired Amer- ican citizenship. Americans, with their superior command of capital, larger experience in organ- ization and management, as well as their inherent animosity to the form of government by which Japan is ruled, would, if resident there in large numbers, not only threaten the Japanese by their industrial competition, but menace the very exist- ence of the government itself. The Americanization of Japan would mean the end of the Japanese state as it exists to-day and would make necessary a reconstruction much more difficult than that by which Japan has within the lifetime of living men emerged from seclusion and become a world power ; with the Japanization of America we would give up all the things our grandfathers fought for. Neither of these even- tualities is probable or possible, but the problems which they involve are projected on us in minor degree with every increase in immigration or in- tercourse between the two peoples. -In its menac- ing possibilities the problem of immigration is as serious for Japan as for America, and if Japan were threatened by the influx of a large number PROBLEMS OF THE PACIFIC 3 of Americans who would purchase land and set themselves up in competition with native labor- ers, we might expect to hear of a much greater outpouring of protests and restrictive legislation there than has been occasioned here by Japanese immigration. The circumstance that America of- fers to Japanese opportunities which Japan does not offer to Americans has compelled America to take certain defensive actions which Japan can forgo, because Americans never have and never will go to Japan in large numbers.^ This is but one of the many complex problems of the Pacific which are pressing for solution. Though never seeking a quarrel with Japan and though having no ambitions for possessions in the Pacific any more extensive than those we now hold, a number of events of the present generation have in a striking and unmistakable way placed 1 The American population of Japan is about 1,700, the total American and European population of the coxmtry being less than 10,000. Of the American population probably half may be classified as missionaries, members of missionaries' families, teachers, or members of the diplomatic and consular service. There are also a number not engaged in any occupation who make Japan their home. Certainly less than one-third are making their living in Japan in the sense that they derive their income directly or indirectly from the Japanese. More than one-half though living in the country are supported by salaries paid in America. The Japanese population of the United States is about 100,000, practically all of whom derive a living from America and in competition with Americans. 4 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST Japan and tlie United States as the champions of opposing and conflicting aims and interests. The conflict of interests of the two. countries is not a possible development of the future ; it is an imme- diate and at-present-existing fact, which no amount of peace-advocate logic can reason away. In the course of time one of the two countries must recede from its present position. We must give up some of our cherished traditions and renounce policies in which all Americans have taken a just pride, or Japan must give up imperial ambitions which are dear to all Japanese and have dominated state policy for years. Tiis book is not written to exaggerate the prob- lems or to alarm Americans. It is the sincere wish of the author that the problems find a peaceful solution and that the ocean which separates Japan from the mainland of America remain pacific in fact as well as in name. But a solution is not to be found until the problem is stated in definite terms, nor does it aid toward a better understand- ing of the situation to give the Japanese credit for a sentiment they do not possess, and attribute to them a code of morality which is as strange to them as is hari kari to us. If the Japan which really exists on the other side of the Pacific were the Japan which exists in the PROBLEMS OF THE PACIFIC 5 minds of many Americans, there would be no seri- ous problem of the Pacific, nor would there be an excuse for this addition to the voluminous litera- ture on the country. The Japan of the wonderful cherry blossoms, the fascinating geishas, and mag- nificent Fujiyama is told of in a thousand pretty books and is graven on the hearts of ten thousand travelers. It is a beautiful and a wonderful coun- try. But this is not the real Japan with which Americans of this war-cursed age are concerned. Cherry blossoms, geishas — the kind of stuff post- cards are made of — are useful to entertain a bored tourist and supply him with thrills and impres- sions, but of no more importance to America than the cathedral chimes which break the stillness of Eussia's white night, or of the golden-skinned maidens who grace the dirty streets of Tehuante- pec. The Japan which we should know is the Japan of farms and factories and fishermen, ruled by a little group of ambitious statesmen and dominated by the imperialistic aims which dominated Ger- many. It is a Japan which has at its command all the superior forces of Western civilization, modem battleships, a trained army, a highly or- ganized industrial system, but in its uses of these forces is subject to none of the restraints which 6 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST govern other powers. The history of the world would have been quite different but for the fact that modern weapons of warfare were not per- fected until civilization had taught a certain mod- eration in their use. Kublai Khan, Hideyoshi, or Tammerlane, if possessed of the weapons and modem forces held by a secondary power to-day, would have devastated the earth. In Japan we see a power still partially under the influence of barbaric traditions of warfare and conquest and yet possessed of all the weapons and powers of the most enlightened countries. A study of her modern history shows that she maintains a dou- ble standard of conduct — one for use with strong nations, the other for use with weak ones. Japan shows to Western nations a studied and careful observance of Western traditions and codes, and yet in her relations with weaker Asiatic powers relapses into the use of brutal tactics which re- veal a code of action and a national psychology as strange to the American of to-day as the strangest, wildest story ever brought from Asia, the land of fakes and fables. It is this Japan we must reckon with in titie set- tlement of our differences, not the Japan of senti- ment and imagination. In the following pages the author will attempt to measure the power of this PROBLEMS OF THE PACIFIC 7 Japan and the restraints on that power ; note the points at issue between Japan and the United States ; and state the methods which past history- has taught us we may expect Japan to use in ac- complishing her aims. CHAPTER n THE BEAL ESTATE POINT OP VIEW WE Americans have often been accused of bragging too insistently about the size and the potential wealth of our national domain, a habit we have doubtless in- herited from our grandfathers, who had little else to brag about. The temptation to measure our acreage against that of less bulky nations is al- ways strong, for it can always be done with the certainty that it will show our own superiority. The temptation is never so strong as when Japan is under discussion, for against no other power can we array such an impressive showing of greater acreage of fields and forests and greater extent of mines. The Empire of Japan is composed of several thousand islands, only five of which are as large as the State of Connecticut, the others being so small that none of them is of any importance and hundreds are not inhabited. Of the five islands which may be said to make up Japan, Honshu, the largest, is the same size as Kansas 8 THE REAL ESTATE POINT OF VIEW 9 (81,000 square miles) ; Hokkaido, next in area, is about the size of South Carolina (30,000 square miles) ; Kyushu and Formosa together are about equal to the area of Maine, while Shikoku is smaller than New Jersey. The entire area of the Empire is only 600 square miles greater than the area of California (158,360 square miles). However, while the area of this small kingdom is about the same as that of California, the extent of its fields is much less. In California one-third of the total area is under cultivation, while in Japan the cultivated area is only one-eighth. A large part of the untUled portion is covered with mountains and hills often surpassingly beautiful but always unproductive. Even the native grass which softens the outliues of the hills and decks the valleys in green, is coarse and hard, and like many other things in Japan is more decorative than useful. It adds to the beauty of the land- scape but will cut the intestines of sheep which graze on it. Mountainous Switzerland contains six times the proportion of agricultural land that is to be found in Japan, where the fields under cul- tivation cover but 20,000 square miles. That is the area from which the present population of 60 miUions is fed except as they are able to purchase food from other countries and supplement the 10 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTEAST produce of the farms with fish and seaweed from the neighboring waters. Nearly the entire popu- lation lives near this source of food supply. There is no part of Japan more than one hundred miles from the sea coast and only one small sec- tion in the interior of the main island is more than fifty miles distant. Both in quantity and quality of fish, few waters are richer than those which surround the beautiful island empire. Until a comparatively few years ago Japan had no foreign commerce and no manufacturing indus- tries of any importance, the country being essen- tially agricultural. The workers of the country have always been farmers and fishermen and, despite the recent progress in manufacturing, the farming population is still predominant and farm- ing remains the most important industry. The farms are naturally very small, averaging less than three and one-half acres. This average in- cludes the areas of upland pastures and plains, which take up fully one-third of what is counted as the cultivated area. It has often been pointed out that the population of Japan is not so dense as in Belgium or Eng- land. But Belgium and England are almost wholly arable; Japan is almost wholly mountain- ous. If we eliminate from the figures of area the THE REAL ESTATE POINT OF VIEW 11 unproductive lands of eacli country, the popula- tion per square mile works out, approximately: England, 466 ; Belgium, 702 ; Japan, 2688. A pop- ulation of 2688 on every square mile of arable land — ^less than a quarter of an acre of land for each person! There is more good farm land in mountainous Kentucky than in all Japan. Japanese publicists, anxious to make the best possible showing for the resources of their coun- try, have often contended that though the soil of Japan is meager in extent, it is so fertile, comes under the influence of such a genial climate and is so skilfully cultivated that its agricultural wealth may be compared very favorably with countries possessing a more generous domain. This is only partially true.^ In some parts of Japan several iThe erroneous statement that several crops a year are pro- duced in Japan is to be found in nearly every book written on the country. Mr. Chamberlain, in his authoritative work, Things Japanese, remarks on the prevalence of this idea. He says: "Many Europeans believe that two rice crops are pro- duced in the year. This occurs as a solitary exception in the province of Tosa, where the warming effect of the Kuro-shio, or Japanese Gulf Stream, makes itself felt with special energy. Elsewhere such a thing is rendered impossible by the length and severity of the winter." According to the official statisticg, which may always be depended on to take the most optimiatie view of Japanese resources, less than one-third of the rice fields are classed as "two crop fields." See Japcm Tear Book, 1914 edition, page 341. In actual practice, most of these "two crop" fields really produce three crops in two year*. 12 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST crops a year are grown, but here the law of di- minishing returns works as inexorably as else- where and the more frequent the crop the less is the yield. In these favored sections excellent sys- tems of irrigation rob drouths of their terror and the climate is so genial that late spring frosts never come to kill the growing crops. But these favorable conditions are not universal. The Em- pire of Japan dots an area which is roughly 1800 miles from north to south and 2200 miles from east to west. If we were to place the southern point of Formosa a few miles south of the south- ern tip of Florida, a point which is on the same parallel of latitude, the country would extend over all the Atlantic seaboard and the northernmost island of Hokkaido would be in Maine. " Or if we were to put the southernmost point of Kyushu in the south of Sicily, it would make a long narrow country covering the whole of Italy, Switzerland, Alsace-Lorraine, Baden, Wiirttemberg, Hesse, and the Ehenish provinces of Prussia. Or if you placed its southernmost point at Assouan, in Egypt, which is on the same parallel of latitude with the south of Japan, you would get a long nar- row empire reaching from there to about Warsaw, in Poland." 2 iEverjf-day Japan, by Arthur Lloyd. THE REAL ESTATE POINT OF VIEW 13 Within this great range of distances there are about the same differences of climate and of soil fertility one would find in the European or Ameri- can territories to which it has been compared. Though some parts are very rich, in many others the soil is thin and climatic conditions make the crop uncertain. In the past five years, though the area planted to rice, the principal crop, has re- mained practically the same, the production has varied more than ten per cent, from year to year, while there has been a still greater variation in the non-irrigated crops. The natural thinness of the soil is shown by the fact that Japan, considering its farm acreage, is the best market in the world for commercial fer- tilizers, and a constantly increasing amount is needed to maintain the fertility of the soil. The yearly consumption of fertilizers, domestic and imported, is estimated at above $100,000,000 or say $5 per acre for all cultivated lands.^ Of this about one-half is imported. This enormous amount of fertilizer is used with the greatest care and the tiny patches which are called farms in Japan are cultivated like American flower gardens. The plants are coddled and nursed to maturity with an attention to details of » Japan Tear Book, 1914 edition, page 343. 14 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST which the American fanner has never dreamed. Wheat, com, and rice are planted in forcing beds as lettuce or tomatoes are planted in America, and, when the young plants have attained sufficient growth, are very carefully transplanted to the field where every clod is broken up and every weed re- moved. Thereafter the cultivation of each plant is a daily task to which as much care is given as an American florist would bestow on his favorite rose bush. Every insect is picked off, every weed removed before it has an opportunity to sap the fertility of the soil. If the farmer fails in an at- tempt to nurse a weak plant back to vigor, it is immediately replaced by another from the forcing bed so that no square inch of the small fields re- mains unproductive. But for all of their labor and their careful use of fertilizers, the farmers of Japan do not raise remarkable crops, as shown by the following average yield for a five-year period : * Rice bushels per acre, 32 Barley bushels per acre, 30 Wheat bushels per acre, 20 Indian millet bushels per acre, 20 Sorghum bushels per acre, 24 Barnyard millet bushels per acre, 26 Soy beans bushels per acre, 15 * Outlines of Agriculture in Jap atios, and the Japanese school system of Korea, where separate schools are provided for Japanese children so that they may not be compelled to asso- ciate on terms of equality with the ''inferior" Koreans. Indeed, the attitude of Japanese to- ward aliens of competing classes and particularly toward other Asiatics on whom they look as inferi- ors is in every respect the same as the attitude of the people of California toward the Japanese. This fact has no particular bearing on the diplo- matic dispute between the United States and Japan, but it is interesting in showing the hypoc- risy of Japanese aspersions on Califomians as "narrow-minded and blinded by race prejudice." The California land law has been the subject of prolonged diplomatic correspondence and of constant recrimination in Japan. There the issue has been greatly exaggerated in the native press and, coupled with the immigration agreement and the other points of conflict with the United States, it has grown into a grave international issue. The army and the navy parties which dominate Japan and divide the wealth and the power of the country between them have made the most of the opportunity for it fitted well with their program, and greatly strengthened their prestige in Japan. The idea of a possible conflict with the United 196 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST States has become so firmly fixed that for several years it has been quite frankly stated ia the Diet and in the semi-official publications of the coun- try that Japan's naval program was prepared with the idea of a possible conflict with the United States. So far Japanese have not attempted to settle the controversy over the California land law, or the other question over the right of Japanese to natu- ralization, in the courts of the United States. If any treaty right has been violated iu the California land legislation, or if Japanese are possessed of the right of naturalization, a very simple manner of establishing these rights would be through a trial before a federal court. If the land law is in violation of treaty rights, the decision of the fed- eral court would nullify the act. Some months after the law went into effect a Japanese resident of California made preparations for a legal test of this sort. A number of prominent citizens who wished to see the issue settled peacefully and with- out further diplomatic wrangles came to the assist- ance of the Japanese so that he was enabled to carry on the litigation at a minimum of expense and was assured of means to carry it to the Su- preme Court of the United States if necessary to obtain a final decision. It appeared that the suit THE AMERICAN QUESTION IN JAPAN 197 would be pressed to a conclusion, but it was sud- denly dropped. It developed later that the Jap- anese plaintiff had dropped the suit at the bidding of the Japanese consul-general in San Francisco, who for some reason did not want to see the ques- tion settled in this way. The truth of the matter is that the Japanese statesmen are by no means anxious to have the California land question settled. By keeping the issue constantly alive it enables them the more easily to carry on programs of military and naval expansion at home, and it weakens any protests we might make against the Japanese domination of China. Indeed, China is the important issue, as was recently admitted by a semi-official representa- tive of the Japanese government. Dr. T. lyen- aga, at the Japanese-American banquet held in New York on May 19, 1915, expressed the views of official Japan when he said: "Unless America stops trying to interfere with the policy of Japan in China and comes to a clearer understanding of what Japan is trying to do in China, I indulge in the prediction that there will be more serious dis- turbances in the relations between Japan and America than was caused by the California affair. We are going to remain the firm and best friend of China, but the United States must leave to us 198 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST the procedure." The present California issue serves the same purpose the Japanese earlier sought to attain by attacks on the Monroe Doc- trine. It serves to divert attention from aggres- sion in China and to make a popular pretext for war. With a foreign policy which is dictated solely by expediency, in which there are no restraints of morality and principle, in which details are tor- tuously changed to take advantage of every fleet- ing opportunity, it is difficult and hazardous to make any predictions about Japan's future course. However, one phase of the complicated American issue in Japan seems to stand out rather clearly. Japanese statesmen have made the most of the California land law and other discriminatory legis- lation in America to work up an anti-American feeling in Japan and to create a sentiment which would be favorable to war with America. Taking advantage of the threatening situation they are able to proceed with more assurance in their plans for aggression in China, feeling certain that the United States will not, by effectively protesting on behalf of that unhappy country, add another to the long list of causes of grievance. However, if it should become necessary to go to war with the United States to remove obstacles to Japan's im- THE AMERICAN QUESTION IN JAPAN 199 perialistic progress, tlie California land law and the immigration restrictions will form a pretext for war wMcli wonld doubtless be popular both at home and abroad and, mirahile dictu, would even gain the support of the Chuiese who are subject to the same restrictions. If in the meantime Japan be able to involve the Monroe Doctrine in the controversy, so much the better for Japan. CHAPTER X WHAT JAPAN THINKS OP US JUST as there are two Japans which disclose themselves to the view of the student when he investigates the country, so are there two opinions of America and Americans held in Japan.** There is as much difference between these two views as there is between official and unofficial Japan, or, to go farther afield for a simile, as much difference as there is between what we think the Filipinos ought to think of us and what they really think. One is the view for home consumption, the other the view held for export to our fair Repub- lic where we charge no customs duty on imported flattery. It is of the latter view we know the most, for it has been very persistently brought to our attention. It has become eonventionahzed, like other things Japanese, so that, though it is often expressed by many different people and under many different circumstances, it never varies far from the original which I fancy must be filed away in the archives of the Japanese Foreign Office and taught to all of Japan's diplomatists. One of 200 WHAT JAPAN THINKS OP US 201 the most recent expressions of this conventional Japanese view of the United States was made by the Japanese consul-general at New York. It is worth quoting in full as it appeared in the Japan Review, a New York periodical supported indi- rectly by the Japanese government in the aid of Japan's foreign relations: "Neither are there any two nations on the face of the earth with such romantic relations and af- fections as those of Japan and the United States. The United States, on the shore of Kurihama, where now in imperishable marble stands the statue of Commodore M. C. Perry, importuned Japan to yield and open her door to trade and commerce. The United States smilingly and gal- lantly brought up Japan in the practice of mod- ern commerce, to which the bashful Eastern maiden, who for centuries kept herself free, sweet and pure from anything in the shape of bargain- ing, trafficking and trickery of trade relations with the world, submitted in fraternal vows. Now that Japan has reached full age, her natural geographi- cal advantage makes it inevitable that she should have the mastery in vast Asian affairs and hold China in her sphere of commercial interest and political influence.^ The United States, proud 1 The statement of Japanese determination to gain the mastery 202 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST and trusted, Japan's spouse, unsullied and de- voted, shares the progress and prosperity of the foster child. Alike in open door policy, in inter- national relations to China; alike in the policy of sustaining Chinese national integrity intact; alike desirous of opening up the vast resources and utilizing and commercializing them, — Japan and the United States hold fast to their exclusively advantageous positions, unrivaled by any in the world. "In co-operation with each other the American and Japanese men of business and industry, each helping the other — if not in supplying capital, then in supplying labor — in turn they supply the vast and fast-growing needs of humanity. Even in her own national demand for raw materials for her factories and manufactories, Japan is largely sup- plied by foreign countries. For herself and for her industrial outlets in China, Japan, in the nature of things, reciprocates vast trade with the American States, whose people share in the Jap- anese trade and industries, in capital investment in Asiatic affairs and dominate China has been made so often by Japanese publicists that it is remarkable that it was not, until very recently, recognized generally as a part of Japan's foreign policy. This speech was made some months before the outbreak of the European war which made Japan's recent raid on China possible. WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 203 and in mutual gain. Thus the commerce on the Pacific has awakened. It has revealed its won- ders. The ndghtiest of the oceans, instead of be- coming like unto the old Mediterranean, where the East and the West — Carthage and Eome — met in the one hundred years ' war for decisive battle for supremacy, Japan and the United States have made it man's theater of supreme achievement of peace and prosperity for mankind." This is the sentiment we hear expressed day after day, year after year. It has formed the text of a hundred, of thousands of after dinner speeches by Japanese on those occasions when Americans and Japanese meet on some common project. There is not a Japanese diplomatist who does not know it by heart in a dozen different forms. True, the same things are said to England, because of the Anglo- Japanese alliance; the same things are said to China, because of the supposed common interest on the ground that both are Asiatics ; simi- lar expressions of affection are voiced for Eussia, because Russia and Japan have the same common plan to rob China; I have even heard similar ex- pressions of friendship for Mexico, though the only common interest between Mexico and Japan was at that time a common dislike for the United States. But it is for us that the most ardent ex- 204 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST pressions of affection are made — and most often made. The sentiment is rather pretty, despite its mawkishness. But how much truth is there in it? The traveler who goes to Japan in a private ca- pacity and expects to find there any reflection of this regard for America is certain to be disap- pointed. That is, he will be disappointed if he ex- pects to find it expressed in Japanese newspapers or by the Japanese people. Instead of these flattering comments on America, there is always, or at least has been during the past few years, a steady outpouring of vilification and abuse of the United States throughout nearly all of Japan's numerous publications — abuse scarcely less vio- lent than that which has recently been exchanged between the German and British press. Even during the time that Japan was actively engaged in war with Germany, the Japanese press was more bitter in its comments on the United States than in its comments on the country against which its soldiers were fighting. No event has been too trivial to call forth abuse of America, no falsehood too glaring for use if by its utterance the United States could be made to appear in an ignoble light. No diplomatic action has been taken by the United States without the basest of motives being at- tributed to it by the Japanese press, and by the WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 205 most audacious misstatements and most specious reasoning, every action is given a sinister and un- worthy aspect. Every European criticism of America has been echoed in Japan, but with a maliciousness of phrase one rarely sees in Europe. During the entire period of the Panama Canal controversy, the bitterest criticism of the action of the United States was not found in England but in Japan. "Hypocritical, cowardly, arrogant, designing, double-faced," these are only a few of the adjec- tives which appear almost daily in the Japanese press, as descriptive of Uncle Sam. In the Tokyo comic papers Uncle Sam always appears in the villain's part, and there are few issues when he is not pictured in the role of a bully, a hypocrite, or a thief. During the entire trouble with Mexico there has never been a time when the Japanese did not throw all of their sympathies with the Mexicans, express doubts as to the sincerity of President Wilson's actions, and exult over every insult offered to the United States by irresponsible Mexican chieftains. The Kokumm (a popular Tokyo paper) expressed its regret that Mexico had given the United States an opportunity to attain her object, that is, the an- nexation of Mexico. The Niroku in a number of 206 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST leading articles urged action by Japan, saying, "it is not merely imaginary or improbable tbat in co- operation with, the Mexicans, we can destroy the arrogance of the Yankees." The Osaka Asahi observed that the arrest of American marines at Tampico was a "pretext for the Americans to seize the chance for the realization of some far-reaching objfict." The Tokyo Asahi found that the reason the United States did not prosecute war against Mexico was only because of her inadequate mili- tary strength which would make the issue of the contest doubtful. The less violent papers found that the United States was planning to annex Mexico and cam.e to the conclusion that if the United States would not interfere with Japan's ambitions in China, Japan might not interfere in Mexico ! Wben at the beginning of the European War, President Wilson made his offer of mediation, Japan had not yet begun to take part in the con- flict, but the only expressions of opinion in the Tokyo papers on President Wilson's attitude were decidedly uncomplimentary to him and to America. A large part of the press, after searching carefully for possible motives, decided that the offer was made out of sympathy for Germany, for, they said, President Wilson saw that Germany was sure to WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 207 be beaten and out of regard for German-American votes desired to bring the war to an end and save Germany from defeat. The papers which did not express that view ridiculed the offer as only an- other of America's hypocritical efforts to appear humanitarian and peace loving. It was taken for granted that there was some sinister motive behind the act, just as it is taken for granted that there is some sinister motive behind every official act of the United States. About the time of this offer of mediation the Sino- American arbitration treaty was negotiated and this was greeted in Japan as a base design to undermine Japanese influence in China. At the time this is written the European War has been in progress for about one year and during all of that time the Japanese papers have been full of inuendos, insinuations and false charges against the United States. It has been assumed that American neutrality is hypocritical and that she is secretly aiding the Germans. The papers have been fuU of false statements ; charging the United States government with allowing German war- ships to find refuge and take on food and coal in Philippine waters and at Honolulu, that Ameri- cans with the knowledge of the Washington gov- ernment were surreptitiously supplying German 208 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST warships with coal and provisions, that America was planning an alliance with Germany in order to attack Japan, etc. Pacts well-known in Japan which would prove these assertions to be false are ignored. All these false and unfair statements and ex- pressions of malicious opinion pass unchallenged in the Japanese press. To be sure there are a few of the more conservative and solid journals which do not indulge in the constant abuse of America, nor do they take the trouble to controvert the false statements of their less responsible journalistic brethren. Even the conservative journals some- times forget their caution and join the anti- Ameri- can chorus. The Japan Times, which is owned by a Japanese company consisting of some of the most influential men in Japan, on last Independ- ence Day remarked: "It would seem that there are Americans who, no longer dreaming of con- quering territory through missionary enterprises, would think nothing of plunging a neighboring state into internecine struggles for purposes of commercial conquest. This is an ominous state of things. We should be on guard lest war may be sprung on us when they get through with Mexico and begin to look round for more commercial con- quests or at least for more international money- WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 209 making opportunities, regarding war as a business proposition. ' ' Japanese opinion of America, everywhere ex- pressed outside of official circles, exhibits this con- ception of American aims and American character. It never gives credit to America for honest ia- tentions or humanitarian motives no matter what may be the subject under discussion. This con- stant stream of abuse against America continues in spite of the censorship which places all news- papers under police control. Peace advocates who are always anxious to mini- mize any international differences readily explain away these attacks on the United States by saying that it is only the driveling of the yellow press and that it should be held of no more importance than similar utterances of the yellow jingo press of America. The explanation is plausible but not convincing. Anti-Japanese articles seldom ap- pear as editorial utterances in American papers. On the other hand, American editors show a great amount of friendliness for Japan. Several of our most prominent weeklies can always be counted on to defend and approve everything Japan does. Anyone who will take the trouble to sift through the comment on Japan which appears in American publications will find that three-fourths of it is all 210 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST that official Japan could wish. It is a reflection, of the press campaign with which Japan manages so successfully to impress on us her views. No American publication maintains its circulation by constant attacks on Japan, for there is not enough interest in this country either for or against Japan to make that possible. But anti- American articles constitute the chief stock in trade of at least a few of the Japanese papers. No American paper maintains a constant campaign of abuse and ridi- cule against Japan, yet that is what several Jap- anese papers continually do and there are few Jap- anese publications which do not occasionally join in the chorus. American comment, even of the most violent and bitter kind, is usually in defense of what are believed to be American institutions. Japanese comment appears to be inspired by noth- ing more than blind hatred. It is the wide distinction between the two opin- ions of America that is so striking. For no other country do the Japanese statesmen profess so much friendship; for no other country do the Japanese press and a large part of the Japanese people express so much hatred and contempt. Many of them appear to share the sentiment of the powerful Osaka Maiwichi which recently said : "It is high time that we ended forever the arrogance WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 211 of these ten thousand times ten thousand half- beast Yankees ! ' ' During recent years several peace societies have been established with the idea of promoting friendly relations between Japan and the United States, and as a result of the efforts of these or- ganizations a number of visits have been ex- changed between the two countries. Distinguished American publicists have visited Japan and re- turned to the United States to explain to their fel- low citizens the attitude of the Japanese people, and visits by Japanese have been paid to the United States with, ostensibly, a similar end in view. The American visitors have done their work conscientiously. Nearly all of them have be- come enthusiastic admirers of Japan and on every occasion when it has seemed necessary have come to the defense of Japanese policies and people. It might be said that they have fulfilled their mis- sion entirely too well, for their devotion to the cause of peace has led them into an approval of Japan's imperialistic program. For America to approve this program might secure peace between America and Japan, but the carrying out of the . program will as certainly mean future conflicts in the Far East, either between Japan and China or between Japan and some other power. During 212 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST Japan's recent diplomatic raid on China, the ap- prehensions of Americans were allayed by the as- surances of these peace advocates. Even after the coup had been accomplished and China had been forced into signing a treaty which gives away valuable concessions and threatens the open door policy, the peace advocates in their enthusiasm for peace justified Japan's ruthless diplomacy and minimized the results of the raid. With the laudable aim of preventing a possible war the peace advocates have done much to pro- mote American friendship for Japan. They have advertised the virtues of the Japanese and have sought to discredit those who write frankly about the Japanese people or Japanese policies. In their efforts to allay the suspicions of their fel- low countrymen they have constantly talked of Japanese friendship and striven to create the im- pression that the Japanese hold for us an affection as unreasonable as it would be unprecedented. One may search in vain for a similar group of Japanese whose enthusiasm for peace leads them into a defense of the acts of the United States. Those who have come to this country on missions of peace have always been active in the United States, but on their return home have made a few colorless addresses and then relapsed WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 213 into silence. From their superior knowledge of America they would be able to refute the many obviously false statements made in the Jap- anese press. They should be able to assure their countrymen that we are not a nation of monsters such as we are often pictured, that we do not aspire to subjugate Japan, control China or set up a trade monopoly on the Pacific. There are a large number of Japanese publicists who are prominent at meetings of an international character and are prodigal in their assurances of friendship when there is an American audience. Among their own people, where much good work could be done in quieting suspicions and removing false ideas, they remain strangely silent. While many Japanese writers and lecturers have gone to great trouble to set forth Japan's views to the United States, there are none who have shown equal energy and enterprise in the more important task of explaining the aims and ideals of the United States to their own countrymen. One might be justified in doubting the sincerity of most of the Japanese peace advocates. Per- haps they are sincere but certainly they do not con- ceive of peace programs as we conceive of them. Count Okuma has for many years been the presi- dent of the Japan Peace Society and has been the 214 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST most outspoken Japanese advocate of peace. Yet he is also the strongest advocate of an increase in Japan's already large standing army, although there is no hint from any quarter that Japan is threatened by aggression. In Japan there is no pretense that the army increase is for any purpose other than to carry out the program of Japan's aggression in China. An insight into what I be- lieve to be a common Japanese conception of peace propaganda was furnished a few months ago in the official organ of the Japan Peace Society. The Mexican situation was then at an acute stage and the Mexican chieftains were more than usually de- fiant. A writer, in an article which appeared in the official organ of the Japan Peace Society, dis- cussed this situation with a keen appreciation for the difficulties of the United States and with rather undisguised joy at Uncle Sam's embarrassments. He said this was the opportune time for Japan to settle all outstanding questions with the United States. "Without saying so in so many words, his inference plainly was that an alliance between Japan and Mexico would force the United States into a recognition of the rights of both countries. Suggestions such as this have been common, but it is rather remarkable that the official organ of a peace society should give publicity to such a war- WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 215 like plan. The Japanese have taken advantage of the peace propaganda to quiet our fears and in the meantime they go on with their own im- perialistic schemes and continue their cultivation of a warlike spirit in the youth of the land. The frequent references made by Japanese pub- licists to Japanese gratitude toward the United States are usually convincing. The fact that Com- modore Perry opened up the country to foreign- ers and the frequent references to the aid which the United States gave Japan in achieving her modernization have led many Americans into the error of believing that the United States, more than any other country, has been the model which Japan has always had before her. Nothing could be further from the truth, for in the employment of those foreign experts who have played such an important part in the making of new Japan, the authorities have turned more frequently to England, Germany, and France than to the United States. In only one department, education, have Americans played an important part, the depart- ment on which there has been the least money spent, to which there is the least attention paid. The organization of the Japanese navy was the work of a group of Englishmen. The French be- gan the organization of the army and the work 216 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST was later completed by Germans. The same is true of the codification of the laws, which was begun by the French and completed by Germans. The first telegraph instruments ever brought to Japan were among the presents Commodore Perry gave to the Shogun. But when Japan decided to build telegraph lines of her own, the work was done under the superintendence of an English engineer. The railways were buUt by the British. The constitution is on the Prussian model. The police system is German. The method of legal procedure is French. Germans were employed for many years to teach foreign medical practice to the Japanese. The originator of the Japanese newspaper press was an Englishman. The first dockyards were built by the French. It is only in education that Americans have been employed and even there the highest positions were denied them. When the Imperial University was established, the foreign staff of eighteen was composed of two Americans, eight British and eight Ger- mans. The part played by Americans, at the invita- tion of the Japanese, has been a very small one. On the other hand, no nation has thrown itself so energetically or so liberally into the work of aid- ing the Japanese. American missionaries were WHAT JAPAN THINKS OP US 217 the first to go to Japan and to-day they outnumber those of all other nationalities. For many years the schools, hospitals, orphanages, etc., maintained from funds contributed by Americans were far more important than similar native enterprises. It was from American missionaries that the Jap- anese youth first learned to speak English. In thousands of cases it was the American mission- ary who educated the Japanese youth to a point where he could secure a lucrative position and in most eases when he reached that point the Jap- anese kicked away the ladder by which he had climbed. It is America to-day which comes most readily to the relief of Japanese distress when flood or famines threaten. It is America which is doing more than any other country, through the efforts of her missionaries and teachers, to aid Japan. It is America which has always sympa- thized with Japan's struggles for progress, and which has paid her the most generous amount of praise for her success. But it is only our national vanity which would lead us to believe that Japan looks to us for lead- ership. There is nothing about Japan's modem life that is American. It is all European. Her leaders look to Europe, not to us. European ra- tionalism has a far greater hold on the Japanese 218 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST than has any idea taught by the American mis- sionary. Why should there be any close friendship be- tween the two peoples ? What is there in common between Japanese and Americans that makes friendship possible? Friendship between Amer- ica and England is reasonable. We have the same history, read the same books, worship the same heroes. Many of us can go to England and find the parish churches where our great-grandparents were married, pick out on street signs and on old gravestones our own family names, and feel a sense of kinship even though it be removed through several centuries. In spite of the super- cilious attitude which our British cousins are stUl inclined to take toward us, there is a lot of gen- uine affection between the two countries, affection not of the maudlin sort based on a few isolated incidents of history, but strong enough to with- stand the occasional jars which incidents of his- tory have given it. Between America and France there are real reasons for friendship, for the two great republics have much in common, and their citizens some traits of mental alertness and vivacity which seem to be peculiar to them alone. There is scarcely a spot in Europe to which Amer- icans cannot go and find there an ancestral birth- WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 219 place. There is scarcely a spot in America to which Europeans cannot go and find there some- thing which has been brought over from Europe and taken root in American soil. There is a bond between America and all Christendom — the bond of common ancestry, common religion, common civilization. There is no such bond between Japan and Amer- ica, in spite of recent efforts to create one. Our history has nothing in common with that of Japan, nor does a knowledge of each other's history bring us any closer together. Japanese history has a strange sound to American ears. We search it in vain for her Patrick Henry, Washington, Jeffer- son or Lincoln. Our own history is equally in- comprehensible to the Japanese. It is to him a record of much bloodshed for ideals and princi- ples without producing a Hideyoshi, or any one man strong enough to rule the country, an achieve- ment which has always been the objective of Jap- anese ambitions. We see in Japanese loyalty to their rulers a docility which is inconceivable to most of us. They see in our refusal to be ruled by any one man an entire lack of that loyalty which is the supreme virtue in Japan. Search as we may, we can find nothing in com- mon between the two peoples. American political 220 JAPAN AND AMERICA— A CONTRAST ideas would be most dangerous to the Japanese state as it is at present organized. A Japanese who would publicly express the political ideas which are aired in any political campaign in Amer- ica would be denounced as a socialist and thrown in jail. An American who tried to apply to America the political ideas of Japan would doubt- less retire from public life besmeared with the ref- use with which a disgusted public would pelt him. There is a wide gulf which separates the indi- vidual Japanese from the individual American. It is doubtless the experience of all Americans who have lived a great deal abroad that they have made friends from among many nationalities, and that in some cases these attachments become strong enough to obliterate all differences as to nationality and language. Such friendships exist, in isolated cases, between Americans and Japa- nese, but an insuperable bar of social usage usu- ally prevents these friendships from becoming in- timate. If there were no other reason for this, the difference in our regard for women would be enough to prevent the growth of intimacy between families. The American's liberal treatment of his wife, his deference to her and his manifestations of affection for her strike a Japanese as not only incomprehensible but as actually indecent. The WHAT JAPAN THINKS OF US 221 American tourist who has ever walked down the street of a Japanese city with his wife on his arm must remember the surprised stares of the Japa- nese. Indeed, to the average Japanese conception of the relations between the sexes, this picture could mean but one thing — a drunken man with a prostitute. After all, what does international friendship amount to in governing the policies of countries? We have only to look at the record of Japan to confirm any cynicism regarding the existence of international friendship. A few years ago Japan, after offering and being refused an alliance with Germany, offered the alliance to Great Britara. The latter entered into the alliance because of suspicions of Russia's plans for expansion. Strengthened by this alliance, Japan went to war with Eussia, which had conspired with Germany and France to rob Japan of the rewards of her war with China. Following the war Japan an- nexed Korea for which country she had always expressed the most solicitous regard, having fought a war with China in order to insure the independence of the Korean kingdom. Now we find the cards all shuffled anew and Eussia, Japan and England fighting Germany. CHAPTER XI IT has always been a favorite political theory of Americans that small and weak nations should be protected from the strong by inter- national agreements and allowed to work out their own destinies. "We have become accustomed to that idea through the success of the Monroe Doc- trine which has left the weak South and Central American States free to pursue their own careers without danger of being gobbled up by the Euro- pean powers. We can point with some degree of pride to Cuba as a practical manifestation of this theory. Our unkind critics sometimes say it is a very comfortable theory for us to expound, for, having all the territory that we desire, it deprives us of nothing that we need or greatly want, thus enabling us to maintain an agreeably virtuous atti- tude at no cost of self-denial. Lack of covetous- ness, they say, is not so great a virtue in one who cannot easUy take care of more than he already possesses. However that may be, the idea is firmly fixed in JAPAN'S AIMS IN CHINA 223 America and many Americans believe in the sound- ness of the policy for the old-fashioned reason that it is just. The programs of the many peace organizations which are supported by American members and dollars contemplate no further changes in international boundaries unless it be the voluntary dissolution of ties which bind colo- nies and over-seas dominions to the mother coun- try, or the peaceful resumption of sovereignty by people now under alien rule. With universal dis- armament there could be little further acquisition of colonies and there might be a loss of some. Without militarism, or, more properly, navalism, there would no longer be any but sentimental rea- sons for New Zealand and Australia to remain in the British Empire. They would no longer need the protection of the British navy for their shores and their trade routes, for with no fighting ships cruising the seas, the danger of attack would dis- appear. It is easily conceivable that with mili- tarism discarded and every people guaranteed the secure possession of the territory they occupy the ties which brad Australia (k» give but one ex- ample) to Great Britain would become weaker with the passage of peaceful years. With the present military necessity of allegiance removed, dominions an