3>C V.i THE GIFT OF i:..'5:l.U::^:^:^....,.^X^ .h-..ll':].93. LiLidl t> Cornell University Library DC 146.B46 A3 1895a "Memoirs o1 Barras, "^ernber o| the d^ecto 3 1924 020 335 430 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924020335430 MEMOIRS OF BARRAS VOLUME I THE ANCIENT REGIME— THE REVOLUTION C_. a„ ^A-3-Ji3_- ROBESPIERRE From an unpublished Drawing touched up in water-colors attributed to Gerard. From the Jubitial de Saint-Albin Collection. MEMOIRS OF BARRAS MEMBER OF THE DIRECTORATE EDITED, WITH A GENERAL INTRODUCTION, PREFACES AND APPENDICES, BY GEORGE PURUY WITH SEVEN PORTRAITS IN PHOTOGRAVURE TWO FAC-SIMILES, AND TWO PLANS " Les panzphieiaires, j'e sitis destine A Hre leur fiature, Jtiaisje redouie pen d'etre hur victiine: Us vtordront stir du granit.^^ — Napoleon IN FOUR VOLUMES VOL.1.— THE ANCIENT REGIME AND THE REVOLUTION TRANSLATED BY C. E. ROCHE NEW YORK HARPER & BROTHERS FRANKLIN SQUARE 189s A.'5 5713> Copyright, 1895, by Harper & Brothers. All rig;his reserved. CONTENTS PAGE General Introduction ix Preface xliii Chapter I i Chapter II ... 8 Chapter III 20 Chapter IV 31 Chapter V 42 Chapter VI 47 Chapter VII 59 Chapter VIII . . - 70 Chapter IX 77 Chapter X 87 Chapter XI 96 Chapter XII 104 Chapter XIII 112 Chapter XIV 118 Chapter XV 128 Chapter XVI 141 vi CONTENTS FAGS Chapter XVII 152 Chapter XVIII 187 Chapter XIX 205 Chapter XX 257 Chapter XXI 279 Chapter XXII 231 Chapter XXI II ,48 Appendix I ,gc Appendix II g Appendix III gg Appendix IV g Appendix V . . . . 393 Appendix VI . . 399 Appendix VII . . 404 Appendix VIII . . 413 ILLUSTRATIONS Portrait of Robespierre Frontispiece Plans of the Siege of Toulon in 1793 and OF Fort MuLGRAVE Facing p. xcvi Portrait of Danton " 184 Facsimile of the qth Thermidor Document . " 228 GENERAL INTRODUCTION I. — The History of the Memoirs. Dispositions TAKEN BY BARRAS IN HIS WiLL IN REGARD TO HIS Memoirs In a holographic will, dated Paris, the 30th day of April, 1827, registered on the 2d day of February, 1829, and de- posited, pursuant to an order of the President of the Civil Tribunal of the Seine, in the office of M': Damaison, nota- ry, domiciled in Paris, on the 30th day of March of the same year, Paul Barras, a former member of the Director- ate, willed as follows : " I give and bequeath to M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin a copy of Anacharsis, and my geographical maps. More- over, it is my desire that my papers and Memoirs, which are deposited with one of my friends, be delivered to him, in order that he shall edit the Memoirs, which I have not had time to edit myself. . . ." On the morning of the 29th of January, 1829, Barras, feeling his end approaching (he died the same day at his residence, No. 70 Rue de Chaillot), summoned to his side his godson, M. Paul Grand. " Fearing that the civil pow- er might seize his papers, in order to destroy the evidence of facts undoubtedly objectionable to the Government of the day, and more especially a correspondence which had taken place between him and Louis XVIII., and having special grounds for his fears owing to the recent seizure of the papers of Cambac^rfes, Barras, a few moments before his death, thought it advisable to take all necessary steps to prevent a like proceeding. ... He imparts his fears to Paul Grand, and urgently requests him to take the neces- X • MEMOIRS OF BARRAS sar>' measures to prevent his political papers falling into the hands of the civil power. . . ." ' Barras having breathed his last at eleven o'clock that night, his papers were hastily crammed into two large trunks, which Mme. de Barras, M. Paul Grand, and Cour- tot, at one time the house -steward of the ex-director, and subsequently his confidential man, deposited in the domi- cile of M. de Saint-Albin during the course of the same night. The precaution was not a useless one, for on the follow- ing day, 30th January, 1829, a justice of peace, accompa- nied by his clerk, made his appearance at the domicile of the deceased in order to affix the seals. This magistrate was acting pursuant to an order of the Attorney for the Crown, bearing date 15th July, 1825. At that date al- ready the health of Barras was badly shaken, and the Min- ister of Justice, M. de Peyronnet, " having learned that M. Barras was very ill, and aware that he was in possession of governmental papers, notably autograph letters emanating from Louis XVIII., had instructed the Attorney for the Crown to cause the seals to be affixed, when the time should come, on all such papers of Barras like to be of in- terest to the Government." " A certain number of documents, particularly letters of the time of the Republic, were sealed, in spite of the pro- tests of Mme. de Barras and the friends of the ex-director, who pointed out to the justice of the peace that he had no right to act by virtue of an order given four years before by a Minister who had since then gone out of ofifice. This seizure gave rise to a lawsuit brought by Mme. de Barras against the State' — a lawsuit which she lost in part, ' Extract from a memorandum laid by M. Paul Grand before the First Chamber of the Tribunal de Prentih-e Instance, 25th February, 1S33. ■ Attempted seizure of the political papers of the ex-director Barras ; an opinion in regard to it delivered to M. Pierre Grand, an advocate pleading in the Royal Court, and concurred in by other counsel. Paris, 1829, to be had from Delaforest, bookseller. 2 The interesting pleadings which took place on this occasion v,-iU be found in the numbers of the Cazctle des Tribunaux of 2Sth February and 7th March, 1S29. GENERAL INTRODUCTION xi in spite of the fact that the most eminent pleaders or juris- consults of the period— Isambert, Barthe, Chaix d' Est-Ange, Coffiniferes, Odillon Barrot, Renouard, and others — concur- red, with all the weight of their authority based on reasons duly set forth in the opinion to which reference has been made, wherein Pierre Grand, brother of Barras's godson, de- clared illegal and arbitrary this affixing of the seals to the papers of a man who for over thirty years had held no of- fice from the State, and whom, moreover, his quality of director had made " neither functionary nor public depos- itary." Consequently the greater portion of the docu- ments placed under seal remained in the possession of the Government, and are apparently the documents found in the Tuileries by the commission intrusted with the duty of making an abstract of the papers of King Louis Philippe after the Revolution of 1848, and which were returned to the Saint-Albin family on its petition based on the testa- ment itself of the former member of the Directorate. However this may be, the portion of Barras's papers most important, both from their number and the nature of their contents, had escaped the search of the Government of the Restoration, which for four years had been on the lookout for these documents, and, having found some few of them, perhaps left designedly in the domicile of the deceased in order to throw the searchers off the track, doubtless be- lieved that it had laid hands on everything. While the lawsuit referred to was going on, and the Liberal party in a body was making a great noise in regard to the arbitra- ry act perpetrated by the Ministers of Charles X., M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin was quietly getting ready to ful- fil the mission intrusted to him by his friend, and the Rev- olution of July, 1830, occurring a few months subsequent to the events just narrated, allowed him to devote himself to his task without danger of molestation. n. — Genuineness of the Memoirs of Barras A certain contradiction will doubtless have been noticed in the words used in the testament of Barras in regard to xii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS his Memoirs. If one refers only to the beginning of the sentence, " It is my desire that my papers and Memoirs . . ." one is tempted to come to the conclusion that there existed at the time of the death of the ex-director Memoirs written by him in a complete form. But, on the other hand, the words " in order that he shall edit the Memoirs, which I have not had time to edit myself . . ." might lead one to infer that the Memoirs for so long known, although unpublished to the present day, under the name of Me- vwires de Barras\i3.v& been falsely sheltered under his name, that they do not perhaps embody the exact expression of his ideas in regard to the events of which they treat, and that they are consequently to be classed with the long list of apocryphal Memoirs. The first point to be examined, therefore, is the genuineness of the Memoirs about to be submitted to the reader. In a long manuscript statement laid in 1833 before the president of the Tribunal Civil de Premiere Instance (dis- trict court) of the Seine, at the time of the suit — whereof more anon — between MM. Rousselin de Saint -Albin and Paul Grand in regard to the publication of the Memoirs of Barras, M. Paul Grand expressed himself as follows : " Bonaparte had fallen, and Barras, although it cannot be said that he had the protection of the new dynast)^ was not yet persecuted by it, was enjoying the quietness of privacy, as he himself admits. He was preparing to put into shape the documents in his possession, classify them, and connect them with one another; he even began a draft on the basis of wliich they zvere to be edited, for the purpose of facilitating the publication of the Memoirs lie intended bringing out . . . His notes luere in part gathered together : there remained to create from these notes an historical entity, to make a narrative of the facts, and deduce there- from such arguments as should serve to establish the jus- tification of himself, for the purpose of which these Me- moirs were conceived." There remained to bring into ' In a species of manifesto dated 20th June, i8ig, and entitled " General Barras to liis Fellow-citizens," the former member of the Directorate announced in the following terms his intention of composing his Memoirs ; GENERAL INTRODUCTION xiii play the various personages who were to appear, to give life to the whole, and lastly to clothe these notes in suit- able language. Barras, in consequence of his age and the poor state of his health, shattered by political worry and sorrows, little accustomed, moreover, to write and to put into practice the rules of rhetoric which his serious occupa- tions may well have made him forget, resolved upon trust- ing to friends what was dearest to his heart — the editing which he had facilitated by his work and his notes. . . ." In another document relating to the same matter M. Paul Grand has said : " Barras wrote himself a number of notes in relation to the principal passages of the projected Memoirs, in order that, should time not be left to him to put the finishing touches to them and weave them into a complete whole, he might intrust to a friend the perfecting and final edit- ing of them." The same idea is expressed more positively and clearly in a summons addressed by M. Paul Grand to M. R. de Saint-Albin : "... The Memoirs of Barras have already been edited by Barras himself during his lifetime : the zvork to be done no longer consists but in a classification, a grouping in order of his manuscript. . . ." I saw M. Paul Grand in 1885, and had a conversation with him. He was at that time about eighty years old. Age had nowise dimmed his intellectual faculties, and his recol- lections of things and men in regard to which I was desir- ous of consulting him were most clear and distinct. On " There has just appeared under the caption of Souvenirs et Anecdotes Se- cretes a work against which I am compelled to protest publicly. . . . Some day perhaps, if my health, shattered by so many vicissitudes, leaves me the faculty . . . I shall perhaps endeavor to render to my fellow-citizens the moral account owed them by men who have handled the affairs of State in most difficult times ; but previous to publishing my Memoirs, I have considered it my duty not to delay recording a denial, in order to establish a most important fact. ..." This manifesto, of four pages of print, constitutes a portion, like all other documents I shall call in as evidence without specifying in any particular way ■ their origin, of the papers left by M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin. It was pub- lished in several newspapers of the period. XIV MEMOIRS OF BARRAS my asking him questions as to the origin and composing of the Memoirs, as to Barras himself, whose faithful friend he had been, M. Paul Grand most courteously gave me all the information I was in quest of. He assured me that actual Memoirs were in existence at the death of Barras, the work of the former director himself, dictated, nay ed- ited, by himself in fragmentary form. It will be noticed that this assertion agrees entirely with the one made by M. Paul Grand fifty years earlier in the documents pre- viously quoted by me, but unknown to me at the time I had the honor of visiting him. Should this testimony not be considered sufficient, I can adduce still more. I have before me a letter addressed to M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin by the Countess de Pelet, 7ic'e Thermidor Tallien, dated I2th June, 1829. " My father," she writes, " had intrusted to M. Barras important notes touching events which both of them had witnessed or tak- en a part in. These notes, in my father's handwriting, were handed to M. Barras, in order that he might derive from them information most useful to him in editing his Memoirs,'' etc. An autograph letter, without date, from Barras himself to M. de Saint-Albin : " Greeting, my dear Alexander. / send you the manuscript and the notes which I have hurried- ly dictated. You will rectify them and edit them ere mak- ing use of them. You will also receive the two volumes of Napoleon ' replete with impudent falsehoods and the ser- vility of his valets. . . ." A letter, dated 30th August, 1830, addressed to the same from Courtot : "... I strongly advise you to issue the Me- moirs such as they came from the lips of the author, with the exception of such modifications in the style as you shall see fit to make. . . ." Another letter from the same to the same, dated 19th September, 1831 : ". . . It seems to me that the time has come for us to publish the iMemoirs of the jmfortunate general. ... I am of opinion that no pri- ' Sidte au Memorial Saintc-Heline, doubtless, by Grille and Musset-Pathav Paris, 1S24, 2 vols. 8vo. GENERAL INTRODUCTION XV vate consideration should be permitted to stand in the way of the printing of so piquant a work. . . . The Me- moirs of the general will constitute an historical monument from which all will come and draw information about the Revolution, and the facts connected with it. . . ." A letter from M. Abeille, mayor of the commune of Ampus (Var), to M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin, dated 5th November, 1830: "I am impatiently waiting to read the Memoirs of my late uncle. ..." A letter from Pierre Grand, an advocate pleading in the royal court, to M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin, dated 24th August, 1831 : "... Depositary of the papers of Barras, you hold the documents affording the most convincing proofs that he ever remained faithful to the principles which made him a director. . . . For a long time past the country has been demanding the Memoirs of Barras sol- emnly promised to it. It is more than two years and a half ago since I made the announcement in the Paris courts that the Memoirs of Barras were to appear ere long. . . . A citizen, I exclaimed before them, Barras was fulfilling a citizen's duty wlien dictating pages which will soon con- stitute history. . . ." In conclusion, I am able to invoke a final bit of evi- dence, one absolutely decisive in my eyes. I have found in the papers of M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin a chemise (envelope for filing papers) containing a number of manu- script sheets covered with the indecipherable handwriting of Barras. The perusal of these sheets, as well as all oth- ers that have likewise come into my possession, proves be- yond doubt that they are in part mere notes, in part actual fragments in complete form. The chemise is indorsed in the handwriting of M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin: '' Bar- ras' s uninterrupted narrative from the \ZtIi Brumaire to 1828. Special events." And above this : ^^ Used." The genuineness of the Memoirs of Barras cannot there- fore be called into question. These Memoirs, projected as early as 1819 by the ex-director, were the object of his constant solicitude during the last ten years of his life. He gathered together the materials for them himself — himself xvi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS he wrote or dictated notes more or less lengthy which were to serve for the final editing of them. Those about him knew that he was engaged in this work; they an- nounced its forthcoming publication, which was looked forward to with impatience, as it was expected to contam "piquant" revelations about the men and events of the Revolution, and especially as destined to make a crushing reply to the attacks directed against the former member of the Directorate. Owing to what concatenation of cir- cumstances have these Memoirs, famed ere they ever ap- peared, remained unpublished up to the present time ? This, then, remains to be elucidated. III.—DlSPUTES BETWEEN MM. ROUSSELIN DE SAINT- Albin and Paul Grand in regard to the Pub- lication OF THE Memoirs of Barras In a codicil dated 30th September, 1827, Barras had add- ed to his testament the following clause : " M. de Saint- Albin will take as his coadjutor for the editing of my Me- moirs M. Paul Grand, subject to the orders of my wife, each of them to receive a sum proportionate to the legacy bequeathed to him from the profits arising from the sale of the Memoirs ; Courtot to share in such profits." This disposition gave rise to long-drawn-out disputes between the four persons whom it concerned. The papers of Barras delivered to M. R. de Saint-Albin a few hours after the ex-director had breathed his last were composed of a considerable number of documents — autograph letters from generals, political men, celebrated personages, reports, documents of all kinds: some pre- served by Barras when he retired into private life in 1799, others collected by him subsequently in view of the com- position of his Memoirs, as attested by the letter above quoted of a daughter of Tallien. If M. Paul Grand is to be believed, the number of these documents was some 15,000. In addition to these precious documents, the two large trunks deposited with M. R. de Saint-Albin on the GENERAL INTRODUCTION xvii night of the 29th of January, 1829, contained the frag- ments of the Memoirs dictated by Barras or written out in his own handwriting, and the memoranda in which he had recorded such and such of his recollections, or such and such of his slanders or grudges. M. de Saint-Albin's task con- sisted, in the first place, in "classifying and putting in or- der the manuscript of Barras and the corroborative proofs," and this primary work accomplished, to proceed with the "final editing" of the Memoirs, the definitive form of which Barras had not had time to determine. It will be noticed that the expressions of M. Paul Grand already quoted regulate in as precise a fashion as can be desired the respective parts of Barras himself and of M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin in the composition of the Me- moirs. It would not be right to say that they are from beginning to end the handiwork of Barras ; but I posi- tively assert that they are the absolutely faithful expres- sion of the mind, of the opinions, and more particularly of the hatreds of the former member of the Directorate. All the notes, all the autograph fragments of Barras, I have been able to meet with up to the present, and which I have compared with the corresponding passages of the Memoirs, agree in every respect as to the basis, if not as to the form, with the editing of M. R. de Saint-Albin. A couple of examples will suffice, I beheve, to illustrate the scrupulous sincerity of this editing. Subjoined is the narrative of a journey undertaken by Barras in 1786, taken from his autograph notes, and opposite to it the same taken from the manuscript of the Memoirs : Corresponding Passage of the Barras's Autograph Narrative Memoirs " I went on a journey with a canon "I set off in the direction of Pic- Can illegible word) of li^ge in picardy, ardy with a prelate held in high es- he was intimate with all the monks of teem by the monks of all the con- that province, so that we were wel- vents situated on the road to Abbe- comed, feted, lodged, and fed in all ville. We were eagerly welcomed in the monasteries, there reigned there them ; joy and pleasure presided over such licentiousness that, although the meals ; those which they spread young, was unpleasant to me, soon we before us were sumptuous, and re- reached the chateau of the bon. de peatedly ended in orgies. I was com- XVIU MEMOIRS OF BARRAS tournon, situated at fiexicourt, he had two daughters, one of whom, to-day Mme. du Chilleau, engaged in litera- ture with success, she corresponded with the most distinguished men of letters and even with the King of Prussia . . . the bon. was a most hon- orable old chevalier, we made there a sojourn full of charms, it compensated me a little for the society of those lux- urious monks," pensated for the disgust I experienced at them on arriving at the chateau of U. de Tournon. This venerable pa- triarch welcomed us ^^■ith the exqui- site courtesy of the linights of olden days. He had presided over the edu- cation of his two daughters. One of them, who became the wife of Count du Chillaut, acquired some fame as a playwright, and by her correspond- ence with the King of Prussia." Here is another passage wherein Barras tells of his visit to the children of Louis XVI. in their prison of the Tem- ple, the day after the gth Thermidor, 1794. Barras's Autograph Narrative "The committee of public safety sent word to me that there was some talk of the escape of the prisoners in the temple for whom I was responsi- ble, I went to the temple, I found the young prince in a cradle-bed in the middle of his room, he was in a drowsy condition, he awoke ■\\ith diffi- culty, he wore a pair of trousers and a jacket of gray cloth, I asked him how he was and why he did not sleep in the large bed, he answered me my knees are swollen and cause me suffering njtjc iiitef-valles {sic) at the joints when I stand, the little cradle is more to my taste, I examined the knees, they were greatly swollen as well as the ankles and that his hands his face was bloat- ed and pale, after having asked him if he had what he required and having recommended him to take exercise I gave the order to that effect to the commissaries and scolded them on the untidy state of the room. " Thence I went up-stairs to Mme., she had dressed herself early and was up, her room was clean, the noise of the night doubtless awoke you, I said, have you perhaps any complaints to make to me and do they give you what Corresponding Passage of the Memoirs " The committees spread the rumor that the prisoners in the Temple, the unfortunate children of Louis XVI. , had escaped. I went to the prison and saw the prince, whom I found in a very weak state from a malady evidently undermining him ; he lay in the mid- dle of the room in a little bed hardly more than a cradle ; his knee - joints and ankles were swollen. He awoke from the state of drowsiness he was in when I entered, and said to me, ' I prefer the cradle wherein you find me to the large bed over there ; with that, I have no complaints to make against those who have charge of me.' While saying this to me, he looked at me and at them in turns— at me, to place him- self in some sort under my protection; at them, to ward off any resentment they might have felt had he uttered any complaints against his oppressors when I should no longer be there to protect him. 'And I,' I exclaimed, ' I will complain loudly against the dirty condition of this room.' I then Avent to see Madame. Her room was a little less indecently kept. Madame had dressed herself at an early hour, owing to the noise she had heard dur- GENERAL INTRODUCTION xix you require. Mme. answered me yes ing the night. I gave orders that tlie that she had heard the noise of the two children of the House of France night, that she thanked me and beg- should take a daily walk in the prison- ged me to see that good care be taken yard ; consequent upon the report I of her brother, I assured her that I made to the Committee of Public had already attended to the matter. I Safety, I obtained leave for medical proceeded to the committee of public men to examine the youthful sufferer, safety, there was no disturbance at the The physicians, among whom was M. temple but the prince is dangerous- Dussault, declared that his illness was ly ill, I have ordered that he shall take a most serious one. When granting exercise and have sent for Mr. Dus- the two prisoners a morning and even- sault, it is urgent that you shall send ing walk, I expressed a desire that the other doctors with him, that his con- keeper who had charge of the son of dition shall be examined and that Louis XVI. should be assisted by two every care required by his condition women, who were particularly to look should be given to, the committee after the child's needs, and see that gave orders accordingly." his room should be kept in a health- ful condition. I have since learned from a commissary of the Temple that my orders were not carried out." If one carefully compares the two texts, it will be seen that certain traits in the autograph manuscript have not been preserved in the definitive editing of the Memoirs: the gray suit, the pale and bloated face of the little pris- oner, the solicitude of his elder sister, to whom woman's unerring instinct reveals even then that she is to take the absent mother's place in exercising tenderness. M. de Saint-Albin has preferred to these picturesque and precise particulars the somewhat high-flown commentary he gives us in regard to the looks which the royal child — wasting away and dying in his wretched lodging in the Temple — is supposed to have cast alternately at his keepers and on the powerful personage adorned with plumes visiting him. Must I confess it? The autograph narrative of Barras — this narrative devoid of orthography and spelling, with- out any literary preparation whatsoever — seems to me more interesting, because one feels that it is, in its dry- ness of an official report, the counterdrawing of reality itself. M. de Saint-Albin, intrusted with the duty of finally editing the notes and rude fragments dashed off at random on paper by his friend, naturally conceived this editing in conformity with the literary taste of the period XX MEMOIRS OF BARRAS he had passed through ; now it is well known how greatly this period revelled in oratorical amplification and the de- velopment of a diffuse and hollow rhetorical display. A fecund writer, too fecund perhaps, and fond of a declama- tory and pompous style, he has seen fit to cast aside such or such particular that doubtless seemed to him to be wanting in " nobility." An historian possessed more than any one in those days with a concern for accuracy, a sense of the pictu- resque, an understanding of the value of small facts, some- times revealing so much of pregnant significance for him who knows how to interpret the pages and extract there- from the vital spark they conceal— an historian trained in the school of those illustrious callers up of the past, like Augustin Thierry and Michelet, would have been careful not to neglect such traits. Oh, this gray suit of the little Dauphin, this bloated and pale face of this poor little be- ing with his swollen knees and ankles, huddled up like a chilly nestling in the cradle he prefers to the too large bed! And the prayer of the sister — that little princess who does not sleep because the noises of the tragic night have reached her ears, who is perhaps wondering if they are not coming to take her, her brother and herself, as they once before came and took her father and her moth- er ! How heart-rending is all this, and what kind of heart beat in the breast of that man of noble birth who thrice returns to this scene ' in his autograph notes, and who not ' These three narratives, apart from some insignificant variations, agree perfectly together. I have given the longest and most interesting one, the one used by M. de Saint-Albin. As an addendum to one of the two other autograph narratives of Barras, which I have not thought necessary to repro- duce here, are a few important lines which, if there could be any possible doubt in regard to the actual death of Louis XVII. in the Temple, would finally set the question at rest : " On my return to the Committee of Public Safety, I told them of my visit to the Temple, of the state of neglect, nay, of the badly kept state of the rooms occupied by the prince and princess, of the serious illness consuming the former, of the urgency of sending physicians, and of the increased care he needed in his weak condition, and that I should report the matter to the Con- vention. Do nothing of tlie kind, was the answer made, we will attend to it and give orders that the prisoners be well treated and properly cared for ; I GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxi once was moved to compassion at the recollection of this visit to the moribund child of his king? It is therefore a matter of regret, I will admit, that in the speed of hasty editing M. de Saint-Albin did not see fit to preserve and make use of all the particulars supplied him by the autograph text in regard to the visit of Barras to the Temple.' It is none the less demonstrated that — barring the unfortunate addition of certain literary orna- ments somewhat out of date which could well be dis- pensed with— the editor of the Memoirs has scrupulously reproduced in both the fragments just quoted the very nar- rative of Barras. These two examples fully demonstrate the method set unto himself by M. de Saint-Albin when carrying out the wishes of his friend. He has given to the authentic text the " suitable style," or what he considered such, and this is precisely the task confided to him by Bar- ras.' But he has not altered the nature of the text, or even falsified it. The title of Memoirs of Barras, under which the edition made by M. de Saint-Albin has been known for over half a century, under which it was submit- ted to Prieur de la Cote-d'Or, whose autograph pencilled notes are still to be seen in the margin of the manuscript, to Michelet, who expressed a desire to consult it when satisfied myself that these orders were given and carried out. But the young prince s constitution was undermined by a hitvioral disease which had already made progress^ so that, in spite of all the care shown him, he succumbed to it^ ' Other autograph fragments, published as an appendix, which one can compare with the corresponding passages of the Memoirs, will sliow that M. R. de Saint-Albin copied almost literally the very text of Barras's notes with- out taking with that text the slight liberties just pointed out. ' See, above, Barras's letter to M. de Saint-Albin, whereby he expressly com- missions him to rectify and edit the manuscript and autograph notes he sends him. This manuscript is probably the narrative of his two journeys to In- dia, from 1775 to 1783, whereof M. de Saint-Albin has only given the sub- stance in the early chapters of the Memoirs, See, also, above, tlie statement of facts laid by M. Paul Grand before tlie Tribunal de Premiere Instance: "There remained but to clothe these notes (Barras's) in a suitable language." And indeed they are oftentimes in a crude form, and it could no more be a question in those days than it is at present to publish them in this rudimen- tary condition. Moreover, all such notes as were necessary to aid in checking the accuracy of the editor, or which may contain some interesting mention omitted in his hurried labors, will be found in the Appendix. xxii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS composing his Histoire de la Rdvolution, does not consti- tute one of those pompous and mendacious announce- ments having for their object both the allurement and deception of the pubhc. This is, in my opinion,^ an essen- tial point, which it is important to clearly establish. At the end of 1829 the work of making a fair copy of the Memoirs of Barras had already reached a very ad- vanced stage. At that time M. R. de Saint- Albin fell a prey to a serious illness, which, together with the events of July, 1830, delayed its completion until 1832. At this date, everything being about finished, MM. Paul Grand and 'Courtot, as well as Mme. de Barras, expressed the opinion that the Memoirs should be published forthwith. The good fame of the deceased, they argued, made it im- perative. The time seemed, moreover, opportune ; the recollections of the Revolution were more than ever hon- ored since the advent to the throne of Philippe Egalit6's son ; publishers were coming forward with the most ad- vantageous offers ; to be brief, M. R. de Saint-Albin had neither the right to deprive Barras of the justification in view of which the e.x- director had undertaken these Me- moirs, nor to deprive his co-legatees of the profits sure to be derived from their publication. M. de Saint-Albin argued in opposition to this desire that he alone should be considered judge of the opportuneness of the publication, just as he had been the only one charged with the care of editing them, the codicil invoked by M. Paul Grand con- ferring upon him merely an altogether subordinate and secondary role. He added that, as his hasty editing re- quired some after- touches, their publication could there- fore not be dreamed of until he had finished the task of revising them. These reasons not satisfying MM. Paul Grand and Cour- tot, they served M. de Saint-Albin with a summons in due form. Threatened with a lawsuit, the latter was adroit enough to deprive them of an auxiliary without whom they were unable to act against him. He induced Mme. de Barras to cede unto him all her husband's rights in the Memoirs. A deed of cession was drawn up by M' Damai- GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxm son, notary, on the i8th of December, 1832. The deed recited that Mme de Barras " has ever considered as evi- dence of the greatest confidence the selection made by the general of M. de Saint -Albin to edit his Memoirs. She can but respect this confidence ; hence she believes herself to be religiously fulfilling the intentions of her husband in leaving, in so far as she is concerned, M. de Saint -Albin the absolute master as to the manner and time of publication of the general's Memoirs. ... In con- sequence whereof Mme. de Barras declares by these pres- ents that she renounces gratuitously in favor of M. de Saint-Albin ... all property and other rights she may pos- sess in the Memoirs of General de Barras by virtue of the holograph testaments and codicil of the latter ... it being Mme. de Barras's desire that her rights shall accrue to M. de Saint-Albin exclusively ; and to that end, the latter should unite in his person both his own rights as well as those of Mme. de Barras, whose renunciation is subject to but one condition — to wit, that at whatsoever time the Memoirs be published, neither material nor moral responsibility shall be attributed to her," and so forth. This renunciation of Mme. de Barras deprived of all chance of success the judicial action MM. Paul Grand and Courtot intended entering into against M. de Saint-Albin. They realized this, and resigned themselves to accept a transaction whereby, against payment of a certain sum by M. de Saint-Albin to each of them, they jointly renounced in his favor all rights to the eventual profits derived from the publication of the Memoirs, leaving him sole judge of the manner and opportuneness of such publication.' IV.— Why the Memoirs of Barras, since 1834 the EXCLUSIVE Property of M. Rousselin de Saint- Albin, were not PUBLISHED BY HIM It would have seemed that, the matter thus settled, ' Transaction of the 19th of June, 1833, between Messrs. de Saint-Albin and Paul Grand ; deed of cession of the 31st of May, 1834, from M. Courtot to M. de Saint-Albin, drawn up by M? Daraaison, notary, Paris. MEMOIRS OF BARRAS there but remained for M. da Saint -Albin to proceed with the classification and fair copy which he claimed was uncompleted, and thereupon to publish the Memoirs. Still he abstained from so doing. Does one wish to know the secret reason which prevented him from proceeding with the publication, subsequent as previous to the series of transactions whereby these Memoirs became his full and entire property? A confidential letter written by him to Mme. de Barras— a letter, the draft and copy of which I have been fortunate enough to find — will reveal the secret of his hesitancy. The Memoirs, it is stated in this letter,' "were edited hurriedly after the death of Bar- ras, ivliile under the impression of the Just feelings of resent- ment he must have experienced in his lifetime, resentful feelings which my lively hatred of his persecutors had ena- bled me to continue, and the mistake and danger lurking tn them had escaped from me in the hurry of an impassioned composition. . . ." M" Damaison, the notary of Mme. de Barras and M. de Saint-Albin, on being asked his opinion after the manuscript had been submitted to him, gave one to the effect that "it constituted a nestful of libel suits." He also stated, after allowing one of his col- leagues, M^ Trubert, the notary of the X family, to read it in a confidential capacity, " that I feel certain that this family, so powerful by its wealth and social position, would never rest until it had obtained vengeance and repa- ration from the courts in regard to ivhat concerned it in the Memoirs. . . ." Mme. de Barras would therefore realize that it was necessary to postpone the publication. Thus, according to the admission of Barras's associate in the work, in some parts of them, in particular in those having reference to the personages whom M. de Saint- Albin styles " the persecutors " of the former member of the Directorate, these Memoirs not only assume the garb of a lampoon, but present such a marked and well-defined defamatory character, that their pubhcation was likely to ' Letter of M. de Saint-Albin to Mme. de Barras, dated 1st September 1S32. ^ GENERAL INTRODUCTION XXV result in prosecutions. This admission has its value. It is of consequence to take note of it at this early stage ; it will be of special consequence to bear it in mind when one shall read in the text itself of the Memoirs certain pas- sages which this confession exposes, so it seems to me, to the most legitimate suspicion. M. de Saint-Albin might have solved the difficulty by sup- pressing or modifying the compromising portions wherein Barras has given free rein to his feelings of resentment against Napoleon, his family, and those about " Buona- parte " with no less violence than perfidy and indelicacy. But in altering so deeply the character of the Memoirs, M. R. de Saint-Albin would have been guilty, it must fain be admitted, of a veritable act of betrayal of the friend who had intrusted him on his death-bed with the care of his justification and revenge. If the editor of the Memoirs did not consider he enjoyed the right to distort the thought of Barras, nor even to extenuate it, if he made of these Memoirs, when putting them into final form, precisely what Barras wished them to be — i.e. an apologetic special pleading in favor of all that personally concerns the for- mer member of the Directorate, and a rabid diatribe in re- gard to everything closely or remotely connected with Na- poleon — one must admit that in faithfully carrying out the intentions of the man whose legacy he had accepted, M. R. de Saint-Albin merely conformed with an elementary rule of probity. It remains to be added that his personal sentiments in regard to the emperor and the empire were in perfect har- mony with those of the ex-director, and that his common and ardent enmity was doubtless not one of the least of his titles to Barras's selection of him for the final editing of the Memoirs. The friend, during the Revolution, of Danton and of Hoche, whose history he wrote, of Cherin and of Bernadotte, who appointed him Secretary -general to the War Department in 1798, of Carnot, who invested him with important functions at home during the Hundred Days, M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin had preserved, if not in all the youthful intemperance of their fervor, the republi- xxvi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS can opinions of his early youth, at least the strongest and most sincere love of liberty. Rallied to the July Govern- ment, after having figured in no obscure fashion in the ranks of the opposition during the reigns of Louis XVIII. and Charles X., a personal friend of King Louis Philippe and Queen Amelie, who honored him as well as his family with their most special kindness, managing -editor for a number of years of the Constitutionnel — one of the found- ers of which he was, and wherein he invariably champi- oned the cause of liberal doctrines — M. de Saint -Albin hated Napoleon almost as much as he did Robespierre, who in 1794 had sent him before the Revolutionary Tri- bunal as the accomplice of Danton. This man, so moderate, so courteous, who contented himself with writing to the author of an alleged biography wherein the part he had played during the Revolution was ridiculously travestied : " Since you are kind enough, citizen, to interest yourself in my reputation, first be kind enough to be accurate. Instead of having been 3. juge of, I was jugc' by the Revolutionary Tribunal. You are too deeply attached to orthography and to truth to persist in depriving me of an accent of such importance to my his- tory" — this fecund and fluent writer, nurtured with the reading of the classics, who seems to have set unto him- self as a model in his numerous works the oratorical grav- ity and fulness of the great historians of antiquity, can no longer contain himself when the name of Napoleon has to be written by him. He then bursts into virulent apos- trophe, invective, and insult ; he accepts and gathers with complacency the silliest and coarsest gossip. Have I not found among his papers the following note in his own handwriting, which, one among many others I might quote, and animated with the same spirit, will suffice, I am of opinion, to show his disposition towards the mem- ory of the great emperor : " According to the story told by several Corsicans who frequented his house, Bona- parte had, when hardly nine years of age, conceived so violent a passion for one of his cousins verging on forty, that he had committed an outrage on her." GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxvii That a grave man of a serious and well-balanced mind, priding himself on his independence and equity, should allow himself to become the dupe of an animosity blind to the point of making note of such nonsense, and put- ting faith in fables so manifestly absurd, constitutes a phe- nomenon passing comprehension, but which one is cer- tainly compelled to take notice of. However this may be, it will be seen from the foregoing that it would have cost M. de Saint-Albin a double effort to modify the text of the Memoirs by rendering them less aggressive : in the first place, because he would have failed in the kind of moral engagement into which he had entered with the man who had charged him with the task of editing them in a spirit of hatred and revenge against Napoleon ; in the second place, because in editing them in this spirit he grat- ified his personal rancor against the emperor and the em- pire. The Memoirs retained, therefore, the form given them by their editor " in the haste of an impassioned com- position which had primarily concealed from him the mis- take and the danger." I have before me the first copy made of the work. It dates from 1830, as attested by sev- eral receipts from copyists. The only corrections it shows marks of are absolutely of no significance. Not a word has either been suppressed or modified in the compromis- ing passages which aroused the prudence of M' Damaison. Rather than change anything in the primitive text com- posed from the notes, dictations, or already edited frag- ments of Barras, M. de Saint-Albin preferred keeping the Memoirs in portfolio, in which they still were when he died in 1847. v.— Why the Memoirs of Barras have remained UNPUBLISHED SINCE 1 847, AND WHY IT HAS BEEN CON- CLUDED TO PUBLISH THEM NOW The children of M. de Saint-Albin, no more than their father, proceeded with the publication of the Memoirs of Barras. The eldest, M. Hortensius de Saint-Albin, a for- xxviii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS mer deputy from the Garthe and a representative of the people in the Constituent Assembly in 1848, was under the Second Empire a councillor at the Court of Appeal. His erudition, his extensively cultivated mind, his literary merits — he wrote prose and verse with equal facility and delicacy — everything seemed to designate him as the one to undertake this publication with which his father had feared to proceed. He was urged to do so, not only by publishers, but by men of literary and scientific attain- ments, who, cognizant of the existence of the Memoirs of Barras, regretted seeing so important a mine of infor- mation withheld from workers in the field of historical research. But in publishing a work wherein is revealed on every page a set determination to blacken Napoleon's fame and character, there was cause to dread calling forth sharp and vexatious reprisals against the memory of Barras, whose friend M. Hortensius de Saint -Albin, like his father, had been,' and against that of M. Rousselin himself, whose political role during the revolutionary period had, as has been shown, been judged in various ways. Hence M. de Saint -Albin did not consider he could permit the Memoirs to see the light of day ; he contented himself with communicating to M. Ars^ne Houssaye's Rcviic du XIX Siccle a short fragment on the 9th Thermidor, inserting it subsequently in a volume en- titled Documents rclatifs a la Revolution fran^aise.^ This fragment, the only portion of the Memoirs of Barras which has so far seen light, is, moreover, inaccurate and incomplete. On comparing it with the authentic te.xt, I ' The Saint-Albin family was, moreover, connected with Barras, M. Rous- seUn de Saint-Albin's first wife having been a Mile, de Montpezat, a kinswom- an of Barras. 2 Paris, Dentu, 1S73. This volume contains also interesting extracts from the writings of M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin on Hoche, Championnet, Kleber, Malet, Danton, and Dugommier. Some of these writings, in particular the history of Kleber and Danton, still remain unpublished. The incomplete and inaccurate fragment of the Memoirs of Barras relating to the glh Thermidor has been reproduced by M, de Lescure in vol. i. of his Mhnoires stir les Jouy- :,ees Rfyolutionnaires, de 1789 a 1799 {Bibliothiqiie des MJinoires relatifs h I'Histoirs de France pendant le XVIII' siecle, Paris, F. Didot, 1875.) GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxix have noticed alterations : " Couthon etait tomb^ sous line balle (shot down) " for instance, instead of " etait caclid sous une table (hidden under a table)," which is to be met with in the original manuscript. Seven most interesting pages referring to the execution and burial of Robespierre have been suppressed. A passage of some thirty lines, which does not appear in the Memoirs, has, on the other hand, been inserted in the extract. A curious autograph note on the death of Robespierre, written in pencil by Prieur de la Cote-d'Or in the margin of the manuscript com- municated to him by M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin, does not appear in the fragment published. This note, which rectifies in a single point of detail the narrative embodied in the Memoirs in regard to the 9th Thermidor, assuredly was deserving of being reproduced, had it no other interest than to demonstrate the almost entire agreement of as well an informed witness as Prieur undoubtedly was with Barras's version. M. Hortensius de Saint-Albin died in 1877. The Me- moirs of Barras then passed into the possession of his brother, M. Philippe de Saint-Albin, former librarian to H.M. the Empress Eugenie, then into that of his sister, Mme. Achille Jubinal, a widow of the former member of the Corps Legislatif, who followed him to the grave at a few years' interval, without having had the time to un- dertake the publication so long called for and promised. Hence it is that, having myself become connected by mar- riage with the Saint-Albin family, all of whose members have within a space of hardly ten years passed away in succession, I in turn found myself, in 1885, invested with the strange task of coming to a decision in regard to the fate of those famous Memoirs awaited for over half a century. Thus, by a truly strange irony of fate, these Memoirs, which one of Napoleon's most bitter enemies has filled with the venom of his long-lived rancor, and which Barras willed, in order that the final touches should be put to them (in other words, that they should, if possible, be rendered still more aggressive), to a friend whose passion- XXX MEMOIRS OF BARRAS ate hatred of the emperor he was cognizant of — these Memoirs lie for fifty -five years without accomplishing their mission of posthumous revenge, and end by falling into the hands of whom ? Into those of an admirer of Napoleon ! After a summary examination of them, and after com- ing across the base insults, the ignoble accusations, where- in are revealed from the very outset the resentment of the former member of the Directorate against the extraor- dinary man whose beginnings he never consoled himself for having favored, and whose genius he subsequently refused to admit, just as he had formerly been unable to have an intuition of it — after having ascertained that this resentment fastened itself in a cowardly fashion upon a woman, Josephine, who more than any other woman should have been sheltered from the slanders of Barras, I must confess that my first impulse was to destroy these Memoirs, just as a man remorselessly crushes with his heel some venomous or unclean creature. But on reading them a second time with a determina- tion to free my mind of the sentiments of disgust and anger with which they had primarily filled me, I was com- pelled to admit that if on the one hand they constitute, in so far as they refer to Napoleon, his family, his friends, and his servants, the most contemptible of lampoons and least worthy of belief, they contain, on the other, a num- ber of pages of capital importance and of the greatest interest. Thereupon I asked myself if I indeed possessed the right to stifle the voice of a man who was the actor intrusted with one of the leading roles in the most palpi- tating of dramas— this deposition of a witness assuredly open to suspicion when dealing with the memory of an enemy, but who has seen so much, who is so well ac- quainted with the events and persons of a period wherein nothing seems indifferent to our eager curiosity, and who, except in the portions wherein his deposition, after bein'^ primarily the speech of a public prosecutor against Bona'- parte, becomes a special pleading on behalf of Barras him- self, upon the whole tells truthfully what he knows. My GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxxi conscience replied that I did not possess such a right, that I was accountable for so precious a document, that this document belonged to my country and to history just as much as to myself, that I was the depositary as well as the possessor of it, and that the act of destroying a deposit is, morally speaking, almost equivalent to the want of delica- cy which would be shown in embezzling it. Having positively cast from me the temptation I had felt of suppressing these Memoirs, I thought I would suffer them to sleep their long sleep in a corner of my library. But what answer was I to make to my friends, my col- leagues, my masters, to all those whom history interests, and who were continually saying to me, " When are you really going to make up your mind to let us see those famous Memoirs?" Alas! what could I say in reply unless it was, " I dare not " ? If at least the difficulty had thus been finally solved, I might perhaps have become resigned, however much I felt over the matter, to incur the reproach of depriving the field of historical research of the advantages they are certain to derive from such pub- lication. " But," I argued with myself, " what will become of the Memoirs when I am no more if I leave them in portfolio? What will become of them? Into whose hands will fate, capricious enough to have made them fall into mine, deliver them ? Was I to bequeath them to the Bibliotheque Nationale, and thus enable some enemy of Napoleon to use as a weapon against him all the venom he would extract from these pages, while careful not to recall and prove to the reader that rancor and envy dic- tated them, thus depriving their testimony of all value? Was I to bequeath them to some safe and conscientious writer possessing a regard both for truth and for the great man outrageously insulted and calumniated by Barras? But then how would it be possible for him to establish this essential point — to wit, that the work of Barras is, in everything referring to Napoleon and the people about him, a well-defined lampoon, the result of the combined efforts of two men who hated him, a production consid- ered libellous by the respectable man who first took cog- xxxii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS nizance of it ? As regards myself, it is an easy task for- me to demonstrate this, owing to the notes, papers, and letters of M. Rousselin de Saint-AIbin which I possess. Lastly, I was obliged to admit that the shift of indefinite- ly postponing the publication was of no good ; for it united with the defect of in itself bearing I know not what mark of pusillanimity not to my liking the still more serious inconvenience of exposing Napoleon's mem- ory to incur hereafter a marked injury. It remained to be seen in what way I should proceed with this publication, the necessity of which now forced itself most clearly upon my mind. Was I to give to the public the Memoirs of Barras in their entirety? Or rather, since this text was in some of its passages so man- ifestly unjust to the emperor, would it not be proper to have recourse to skilful excisions which would modify the historical interest of the work without weakening it? I did not feel justified in calling such an expedient to my aid. The master whose teachings I had the honor of listening to — the lamented Fustel de Coulanges, to name only the one who, next to my father, most contributed to forming my conscience as an historian — inculcated into me so great a regard for truth that the mere idea of altering a document in the slightest degree is intensely repugnant to me. I felt that it was beyond my powers to remodel or truncate the text of Barras, since an operation of that kind, even if performed with the most laudable intentions in the world, bears a strange resemblance to a forgery. Ne quid falsi attdeat, ne qtcid veri von aiideat Instoria, Cicero has said.' " To shrink from all falsehood, not to shrink from any truth." It will, I trust, not enter the mind of any one that I have been wrong in putting into application a precept whose observation imposes itself as the most inflexible of rules upon whomsoever under- takes an historian's duties. I must add that considerations of another kind con- firmed me in the, so to speak, professional repugnance I ^ Dc Omt.,\\. 15. GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxxiii felt in giving to the public an expurgated text of the Memoirs of Barras. Let one take into consideration how they came into my possession — by inheritance, after all. Whether I will it or not, it follows none the less from this initial fact that I am, when publishing these Memoirs, the testamentary executor of Barras himself, who bequeathed them to M. Rousselin de Saint-Albin precisely for the purpose of such publication. Was it then a puerile and gratuitously invented case of conscience, or rather, was it not the most natural of scruples to ask myself, as I have done, if I had not duties to perform towards the man whose heir I am to a certain degree? And did not the first of these duties consist in respecting absolutely his idea of adding nothing to, of eliminating nothing from, what he expressly wished to convey, even when what he says wounds and offends my personal sentiments — in a word, to publish his Memoirs as conceived by him and by the posthumous collaborateur whom he charged with perfecting his work, such, on the whole, as they were transmitted by those from whom I hold them ? I have believed, and I still believe firmly, that there can be no possible doubt on this score, and that it was for me an imperative moral obligation with respect to the author of the Memoirs, as well as history itself, to publish this text without the change of a single word. But I have also considered that my duty as testamentary executor did not exact anything more from me ; that, having once loyally performed it, I once more entered into possession of all my rights as historian and critic ; and that there was no valid reason to prevent my judging with an entire inde- pendence, or if need be, as one may already have seen, with severity, both the Memoirs of Barras and Barras himself. Hence did I resolve upon publishing the Memoirs in their original form. But was there not cause to fear that this publication would cause a sort of scandal, from the very fact of the calumnies and insults which make these Memoirs of the ex-director a long diatribe against Na- poleon? This fear had doubtless been experienced by c — I xxxiv MEMOIRS OF BARRAS M. H. de Saint-Albin thirty years before, and it was a legitimate one in those days. There still existed in the France of that period an almost universal sentiment of respect and admiration for the memory of the emperor. Instead of shedding, as required later on by the ofncial doctrine, hypocritical tears over the 1 8th Brumaire — a revolutionary act, like the outrageous execution of the Due d'Enghien, one that is to be judged equitably on con- dition only that it is not taken apart from the series of deeds of violence, popular or governmental, to which it belongs and of which the inner history of the country was made up — one was thankful to Bonaparte for rescuing our fatherland from the rottenness of the Directorate, for remaking a country falling into decomposition, and of finally having embodied in its institutions the best and most essential ideas derived from the conquests of the Revolution. "/ closed the abyss of anarchy and made light shine through chaos. I cleansed the Revolution of its pollution . . . I gave stimulus to every emulation, re- warded every merit, and extended the limits of glory . . ." ' In consideration of such benefits people excused his faults, condoned the very delirium of his ambition and of his pride, and even the follies of that pitiless and un- bridled policy which has cost us so dearly. And I am of opinion that those were the proper sentiments for a great nation to feel towards a great man. But to-day, after the appearance of the publications of Michelet, Lanfrey, M. Proth, and M. lung, who is there who could in all sincerity still look upon this dread of scandal as anything but a display of childishness ? Does there remain anything to be said against Napoleon ? Have his detractors spared him a single ignominious in- nuendo, insult, or calumny? Have they not gone so far as to even call in question his military genius, his soldier's courage, as did Lewis Goldsmith as early as 1814 in his vile pamphlet? Has it not been sought to prove that he ' Cornspondance de NapoUm I", vol. x.-cxii. , p. 264, Paris, Plon et Du- maine, 1870. GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxxv was in reality naught but a knavish, bloodthirsty, and lewd bandit? Vain efforts! After so furious an onslaught the emperor continues to be the dominant figure of the century on the threshold of which his colossal form stands erect. So the statue of Memnon at the entrance to the Egyptian desert. Sacrilegious hands have attempted to maim the calm visage of granite respected by centuries. But so long as there are men they will stand wrapped in thought at the foot of the giant image and measure their littleness by its greatness. Thus will posterity do in front of the sphinx with the enigmatical and sovereign visage who was Napoleon. Toujours lui ! Lui partout ! Ou brulante ou glacee, Son image sans cesse ebranle ma pensee. . . . Histoire, poesie, il joint du pied vos cinies. Eperdu, je ne puis dans ces mondes sublimes Remuer rien de grand sans toucher i son nom.' Just now his legend, his indestructible legend, is arising on all sides of us, radiant as a star. On the wane of a ceritury born amid enthusiasm and closing in the gloomy sadness of an universal disenchantment, in this hour when society, battered in breach, knows neither how to reform nor protect itself, and when the most formidable danger threatens all that is dear to us, the urbanity and gentle- ness of our manners, the delicate culture of men's minds, the cherished ideas of toleration, liberty, fatherland, art, and even science, whose name the new barbarians invoke, that science doomed to perish like all other things under their brutal domination — in this hour of anguish through which we are passing, what a beneficial diversion, what a consolation it is to be able to take refuge in that heroic novel full of battles and adventures, to be able to live in thought, if only for a moment, a prouder and nobler life than the one to which the absence of all common faith, of all high ideal, condemns us ! Is not the reason of the renascence of the Napoleonic legend among us? The ' Lui in Les Oruntales, Victor Hugo. — Translator's note. xxxvi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS France that we see in it, so different from our own, ex- ercises an irresistible seduction over our minds. How robust and healtliy was the body social in those days ! " This is what we were a century ago," we say to ourselves. " What a generous sap flowed in the nation's veins ! What a fine and strong race of men! How they lived! And how they knew how to die ! What virtue has then passed from us that we so little resemble this superb generation ?" Awakening as it does this unanimous sentiment, the sublime epic poem ceases to be the property, the object of the cult of a few interested devotees ; it widens itself and attains the proportion of a kind of national religion. The French conscience, deceived for a while, has at last concluded to understand that this legend would not have struck such deep roots in the heart of our nation had it been merely less mendacious than the impious and mean history with which it has been sought to smother it. And I do not, as far as I am concerned, believe that the popular instinct is wrong in revising the narrow-minded judgment presented to France as the final expression of the truth in regard to Napoleon. 'Tis true he was a terrible mower of men. I grant that he is to be hated by the mothers of to-day in remem- brance of the many children he took from those of days gone by. But let our hearts, our men's and soldiers' hearts, ever bound at his name ! The heroic undertakings which he exacted of his own, our fatherland may per- chance demand of us to-morrow. And it is fitting our- selves to better fulfil them to think oftentimes of the man- ner in which the companions of the great captain acquitted themselves. Woe to France should a day come when this bloody and stirring page of her history ceases to touch her! Besides, there is no crime in getting men killed. The human plant is entitled to live only a few brief days. To cut it down before its hour is not to disturb the eternal order of things, but merely to forestall it. Thus mowed, it grows again just as sturdy. The actual crime consists GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxxvii in degrading, in debasing the soul of a nation. For the soul is not a thing that passes away like men : it remains ; and there does not exist any beneficent power which can undertake the healing of the harm done the soul, as there is a fecund and reparative nature which hastens to raise up new generations to compensate for the loss of those decimated. In the soul every wound is a deep one, slow to heal, if ever it does heal. The fatal materialistic con- ception of life everywhere triumphant nowadays, destruc- tive of every generous aspiration, inflicts on us invisible and mortal wounds from which oozes what is best in us. Napoleon did not inflict any of that nature on us. He did no more than cut into our flesh. The wounds he inflicted have closed up. On leaving his terrible hands, France was once more valiant and strong. Who dares to say that Napoleon committed the crime of debasing his nation ? It is not even accurate to assert that all the blood he caused to be shed cries aloud for vengeance against him. Those who shed it for that man were less his victims than the enthusiastic confessors to his superhuman greatness. Go ask Lasalle, Marbot, and the rest if they dreamed of repining because men died young at the side of the em- peror ! Thanks to him, the manly cheerfulness of action made one long enchantment of their brief existence. Their minutes were fuller than our days. These young men had no regrets when falling on the field of battle, for they had lived more and better than the old men of an- other age ; they had exhausted life. Their blood, in which it is sought to drown his glory, is not for that, but, on the contrary, to proclaim that they shed it. To invoke it against him is to tamper with a document, to alter the sense of unimpeachable evidence. And this evidence says clearly, " Praised be unto the consummation of centuries the magician who made us live the most beautiful dream men ever lived ! For him we laid down our lives with joy, because at the degree of love to which we had at- tained the entire sacrifice of ourselves to our god could alone satiate this love, and also because we felt that by xxxviu MEMOIRS OF BARRAS virtue of this sacrifice the most obscure of us became a coUaborateur in an immortal work." The boiirgcoise history, the positivist history of to-day, with its narrow views and wretched psychology, feels triumphant when it has set forth in its vain statistics the account of the lives he cut down. It does not know that war has its function on this earth, and that this function is not solely hurtful. The storm breaks off branches, uproots trees, and ploughs the earth, but it purifies the air. Thus does war. It destroys in the material order ; in the moral order it often restores or revives. The man- ly virtues which a nation enslaved by egotistical and gross appetites was suffering to drop into oblivion — constituting as they do the very basis of its existence — are reanimated and restored to their splendor by war. Therefore war rescues that nation from the slow decomposition under- mining it, maiming, but regenerating it. Doubtless Napoleon loved war too much. Let it there- fore be said, if so one wills, that the man was Death. But in a no less eminent degree he was also Life. Why does one not show us, in juxtaposition to the hecatombs exacted by his grandiose and mad conceptions, the finest of his works — the temper of heroism he was able to impart to the nation? Who would dare, without reddening with shame, to compare the moral quality of his France with that of ours? "Honor and bravery oozed from all the pores of my young soldiers !" he exclaimed, when speaking of his recruits of 1813 after an engagement in which these lads had fought like lions. Honor and courage, devotion to duty, the spirit of sacrifice for the fatherland, the love of glory— yes, that is indeed of what strong dough his power- ful hands had kneaded France. And in spite of what may be said, glory is no vain word, no fleeting sun's ray which rests for an instant and then vanishes. This golden ray penetrates. It fertilizes, it awakens to life mysterious powers lying dormant in the recesses of the conscience of nations. Glory is a force, an active and enduring force, which is transmitted. It incites the new generations not to fall from the high rank in GENERAL INTRODUCTION xxxix which the old ones have placed the fatherland. Those who, like Louis XIV. and Napoleon, have given glory to a nation, remain the eternal benefactors of that nation, for they have thereby conferred on it a moral vigor, a manly pride, a clear consciousness of its dignity, which, extolling it in its own eyes as well as in those of others, compel it to think and act more nobly, if only to remain equal to itself. Now what glor>' is comparable to that France owes to her emperor? Such was Napoleon, the greatest creator of energy and enthusiasm, the most powerful disseminator of ideals that ever lived. His was the marvellous gift of being able to elevate an entire nation far above the mean level of hu- manity, of inspiring it unto delirium with the most gener- ous passions. Already before him the Revolution, whose work he continued, and with which he remains indissolu- bly united, had accomplished this miracle. Let us forget and forgive the scaffolds of the one, the slaughter of the other ! There is no shedding of blood that can prevail against a like benefit. This is what France begins to feel in a confused way; such is the essential feature she re- members of that prodigious history which all the venom of a Barras will never succeed in wiping out. What hold does one believe the suspicious tattle of a man exasper- ated with envy can have on the extraordinary man who has so victoriously resisted not only vulgar pamphlets, but the powerful scientific apparatus brought into play by a thinker and writer like Taine? But, it will be objected to me, the emperor is not the only person attacked in the Memoirs of Barras. They contain likewise grievous insinuations against Josephine. Do you not dread appearing in a certain degree the ac- complice of the wicked deed perpetrated by the author when giving to the public what Barras too clearly makes under- stood in regard to his intimacy with Mme.de Beauharnais? By way of answer to this, I content myself with referring to the supplement of the Biographic Michaud'^ and to the ' Vol. Ixix., under the head "Josephine," p. 225 it seq. xl MEMOIRS OF BARRAS Papicrs et Corrcspondanccs de la Famille imperiale ' the persons I may be unfortunate enough to displease by al- lowing the wicked utterances of the ex-member of the Di- rectorate about her who was empress of the French to see the light of publication. It will be sufficient to glance over this article of the Biographic and the two letters of Josephine to Barras published by the commission which accepted the task of ransacking, subsequent to the 4th of September, 1870, the papers of the Emperor Napoleon III., in order to convince themselves that the Memoirs of Barras, whatever innuendoes they may contain, reveal nothing on this score which has not long since been di- vulged. It would therefore be both unjust and absurd to assert that I have, in publishing them, failed in the reserve and consideration a gentleman owes even to the memory of a woman, especially one as good and charming as that one was. I would doubtless have shrunk before the reve- lation of the weaknesses to which it is unfortunately too certain Josephine allowed herself to succumb previous to the time when deep sentiment — one probably new to her — purified her of those " vices of the day," and made the too quickly consoled widow of Alexandre de Beauharnais the blameless wife of the First Consul and of the emperor. But the fact remains that the coquettish and frivolous friend of Mmc. Tallien did not pass unsullied through such a period as that of the Directorate, when public morality had fallen so low, and when the virtue of women was unavoidably exposed to the attacks of the general corruption — this fact, whether one wills it or not, belongs to history. Will then the indiscretions, the cowardly slanders of Barras do harm to Josephine ? Alas, we already know that she was frail, and, if all must be said, we have long ago condoned her frailty, so much has her grace, he'r divine goodness, her abnegation in the tragic hour of di- vorce, eloquently pleaded her cause with us! But what we were perhaps ignorant of is, that the fine exterior of ' Papiers et Correspondances de la Famille impeiiale. Paris, lS-2, Beauvais, vol. ii. , pp. I, 2. GENERAL INTRODUCTION xli nobility with which the Vicomte de Barras delighted in bedecking himself concealed the soul of a contemptible wretch. And this point will, I venture to believe, be suf- ficiently brought to light when one shall have seen the language he uses towards the woman who did this low fellow the far too great honor of noticing him. To make public this additional trait to what was already known of the cynicism and immorality of this man, to show him — on his own testimony at that — as even more vile than one had suspected him to be, is it not one more means of defending from this defamer the great iigure he sought to outrage? This is the reason why I undertake with a feeling of absolute security this publication, wherefrom the memory of Napoleon has, I am convinced, nothing to lose, and from which history will certainly derive benefit. For this purpose I invoke the words of the emperor himself: " Calumny has exhausted all its venom against my per- son ; it can no longer affect me ; it is no longer anything more in my eyes than the poison of Mithridates. . . . I am fated to be the food of pamphleteers, but I have no fears of falling a vietim to them : they will bite granite. My memory is entirely composed of facts which mere words cannot obliterate. . . . If the great Frederick or any other man of his mould were to set to zvriting against me, it would be a different matter — it would then perhaps be time for me to be moved ; but as to all others, however much wit they may inject into their work, they will never be doing aught but firing blank cartridge. . . . Falsehood passes, truth remains. . . . What has, after all, been the result of the immense sums spent in libelling me? Soon there will be no traces of them, whereas my monuments and institutions ivill commend me to the most remote posterity. ... In spite of every libel, I entertain no fears for my fame. Pos- terity will render justice unto me. The truth will be known, and the good I have accomplished will be set against the mistakes I have committed. I am not concerned as to the result. . . . " ' ' Fragments taken from the Minwrial and reproduced in the Correspon- xlii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS Did I need, in order to publish the Memoirs of Barras, any other permission than that of my conscience, I should find it in the grand utterance under the weight of which Napoleon, with the sovereign authority of genius sure of itself and its work, has beforehand overwhelmed all his defamers. Like all others, Barras " will bite granite." George Duruy. dance de NapoUon /"'■ Paris, Tlon et Dumaine, 1870, vol. xxxii., pp.252, 287, and 325, passim. PREFACE I.— The Man The first volume of the Memoirs comprises the period of the life of Barras prior to the Revolution (Chapters I. to VII.) and the Revolution itself, from 1789 to the Con- stitution of the Year III. {ijg^)—i.e., to the Directorial Government (Chapters VII. to XXII.). From the very first pages, the self-complacencyand the vanity which constituted one of the dominant traits of the character of Barras are given full play in the Memoirs with a comic and delightful na'ivcti. If, on the other hand, he is good enough to confess to us his tastes for pleasures "which have oftentimes diverted me from my duties," he eagerly redeems this avowal by revealing that he is proud, brave, and his first impulses were ever gen- erous. Any other man might perhaps feel embarrassed about telling us of his pedigree. Bear in mind that he was truly of noble descent, and that his pedigree is a genuine one." But this very nobleman, who treasured among his papers a genealogical tree bearing the proud device Vivat Bar- rassia proles, antiquitate nobilis, virtute nobilior^ took an active part in the decapitation of his king, and even, in the ardor of his Jacobinical zeal, asked that a fete should ' Papers of M. de Saint-Albin. An extract from the Nohiliaire de Pro- vence, by the Abbe Robert; "The Barras family is among the oldest and most noble of Provence ; it possesses documents of the year 1200 granting the title of knight to bearers of the name." ' Papers of M. de Saint-Albin. Genealogical tree of the Barras family. The arms of the Barras were, according to the same Nobiliaire de Provence, " fascees d'or et d'azur de six pieces." xliv MEMOIRS OF BARRAS celebrate the anniversary of the liberating day on which the head of Capet had fallen on the scaffold. How then reconcile his pride in his noble origin with these deeds which the most rabid sans-ciilottc would not have dis- owned, this studied attitude of an impenitent Revolution- ary which he assumed and studiously retained to the very last day of his life, even after his equivocal intercourse with the brother of the man whose death he had voted ? Barras gets over the difficulty in truly admirable fashion. A nobleman and proud of his parchments, he is careful to inform us that the Blacas, the Pontevfes, the Castellane "claimed" affinity with his own family, that family hav- ing for ages " courage and popularity for its appanage," and which traces its origin so far back that its antiquity " is equal to that of the rocks of Provence." He even condescends to add that one of his ancestors " was select- ed to be present at the single combat between the Em- peror Louis of Bavaria and Francis I." Very single in- deed it was, and one which astonishes the historian accustomed to believe, on the strength of mere bourgeois chronology, that the Emperor Louis of Bavaria and King Francis L, having lived at two centuries' interval, must have experienced some difficulty in coming together. But it must not be imagined that the descendant of this val- iant knight is the dupe of mere vainglory. If he relates these frivolous particulars, it is because an author of me- moirs does not, as is well known, possess the right to con- ceal anything from posterity. Born of a line of Crusaders, but above all a son of the Revolution, Barras estimates at its full value " his feudal baggage." These baubles which he takes such pleasure in enumerating, at heart he de- spises, you may be sure. When still quite young, he al- ready possessed a republican soul, and repulsed with the same horror the humiliation of "wearing a livery" and the offer made him of entering as page the household of the Due d'Orl(Jans. He a page ! Shade of Brutus ! And this is the way things are told when one plumes one's self on possessing ancestors contemporaneous with St. Louis, and when one is likewise proud of havino- PREFACE xlv played a part in the Revolution, even though the exi- gencies of the part imposed on one the strange obligation of assisting the son of St. Louis to ascend to heaven. An aristocrat by birth, education, and tastes ; a demagogue by profession ; a terrorist without wickedness, but not without doing harm ; bloodthirsty at certain periods of his life, albeit possessed of good-nature, even of inborn gener- osity, because he lived in terrible days wherein each one trembled for his head, and when the surest way of escap- ing the scaffold was to send to it, by way of precaution, any person who made you uneasy ;' talon rouge et bonnet rouge^—SM<^ was the most epicurean, the most refined, the most ancien regime of the Montagnards, and the most wildly revolutionary among the noblemen in the Conven- tion, the Jacobinical Vicomte Paul de Barras.' II. — Barras prior to the Revolution The first four chapters are devoted to a narrative of the two journeys to and campaigns in India, in which Barras took part as a sub-lieutenant in the Pondicherry regiment, from 1776 to 1778. These chapters, contain- ing some rather amusing anecdotes — such as the story of a shipwreck on the Maldive Islands — are the rhimi^ of a much fuller narrative composed by the young officer in the form of a travelling journal, the autograph manuscript ' See chap. xiii. General Brunet has denounced to the Committee of Public Safety the illegality of certain acts of Barras in the south. Barras, thus threatened, saves himself by accusing in his turn the unfortunate general of treason, and Brunet is guillotined. But the same man who does not hesitate to send a man to the scaffold, in order to keep his own head on his shoulders, becomes humane again as soon as fear no longer compels him to be pitiless. See chap, xviii., how he interfered on behalf of Hoche, Championnet, and Kellermann, and has their names struck off. a proscription list. 2 Literally, "red heel and red cap," an allusion to the red heels worn by the nobility, and the Phrygian cap of the revolutionaries ; or, nobleman and revolutionary. — Translator's note. = At the time of the purging of the Society of Jacobins, early in '93, Barras was considered worthy of being retained on their members' roll. (See Memoirs, vol. i., chap, xi.) xlvi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS of which, found among the papers of M. de Saint-Albin, has seemed sufficiently interesting for a few pages of it to be given in the Appendix. The copious and precise par- ticulars supplied by this journal in regard to the energetic defence of Pondicherry by M. de Bellecombe, from the 5th of July to the i8th of October, 1778, constitute no unim- portant contribution to the history of our struggles against the English in India.' The carelessness of the Govern- ment, the heroism of the officers and soldiers, appear in this narrative in traits which call forth both our anger and admiration. The following chapters" set forth the preludes to the Revolution. On returning to France, Barras leaves the army, settles in Paris, lives in the intimacy of the most celebrated persons of the period, and begins to assume an openly avowed attitude of regular fault-finder of the Court and the Government. He stands out boldly against Min- isters,^ denounces the luxury, gormandizing, and corrup- tion which, it appears, reign in conventual establishments.* Certain confidences which his unbearable conceit of lady- killer willingly allows to escape him '' nevertheless give us good cause to think that Barras was not in those days, any more than in his later years, a very austere moralist. This puritan, whom the relaxation of monachal morals scandalizes, is on an intimate footing with such adventur- ers as the Lamottes, of necklace affair notoriety, neither of whom, man or wife, was a model of virtue. Let us not complain of this, for this somewhat interloping connection has furnished Barras the opportunity of giving us concern- ing this famous affair some interesting particulars which clearly demonstrate the absolute innocence of the Queen and the truly fathomless depth of the gallant Cardinal de Rohan's stupidity." Now you may feel sure that if the ' See Appendix I. s Chaps, v. and vi. ' See in chap. v. his altercatioh with M. de Castries. ^ See chap. vi. ' See the beginning of chap, ii., where he sees fit to inform us of his first love affair at the age of sixteen with " a most charming woman." ' See chap. vi. PREFACE xlvii unfortunate Marie Antoinette had in this strange ad- venture been guilty of the slightest indiscretion, Barras would have taken good care to let us hear of it. For 'tis strange this man who was so greatly loved of women never had forgotten that sentiment of indulgent gratitude which seemingly should accompany, in the case of the spoiled children of love, the sweet obligations entered into with the other sex. He loved many women, but he never loved Woman. The instinct of slander was as powerfully developed in him as the instinct of conceit. Noble and illustrious women, such as Mme. Roland and Mme. de Stael, were, as will be seen, like Josephine, subjected to the sharpest traits of his malice. And it savors of a miracle that Marie Antoinette should have escaped suffer- ing from the need felt by Barras of soiling the reputation of every woman whose name he penned.' III.^Barras and the Storming of the Bastille With Chapter III. of the Memoirs we enter upon the Revolution. The great event opening this period of our history, the storming of the Bastille, is referred to briefly and in a commonplace way. Barras has remembered and transmitted only a solitary particular from among the various incidents characterizing that famous day. He saw emerge from the dungeons " the victims of arbitrary power, rescued at last from torture and the oubliettes {secret dungeons)," and among these " victims " the interesting Marquis de Sade. Such poverty of information is all the more likely to astonish us because not only was Barras ' Barras shows, moreover, as little consideration for his male as for his female contemporaries. This is how he passes judgment on some of them : " Fran9ois de Neufchateau, Cambaceres, and Sieyfc, the most degraded trinity; Jourdan, general- in - chief, vile, cowardly, and without talents; Massena, brave, daring, but stupid, a thief and hypocrite, like an Italian ; Letoumeur, a mere cipher, but pufTed up with pride ; Carnot unites to ordinary means a great love of work ; Brune ought never to have left the ranks of printers," etc.— Papers of M. de Saint - Albin, autograph note of Barras. xlviii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS an actual spectator, as he says, but as early as 1789 he had written an account of it, the autograph manuscript of which was found in the papers of M. de Saint-Albin.' Now just as the passage in the Memoirs relating to the storming of the Bastille is dull, vague, and insignificant, so is the narrative of 1789 interesting, owing to the quantity and aspect of truth of the information contained in it. The impression remaining after a perusal of these pages, evidently composed on the spur of the dramatic events they record — this impression is, it must be confessed, that the day rendered forever memorable by the taking of the Bastille was upon the whole nothing but a horrible and bloody saturnalia. Nothing heroic in this first narrative. The defenders of the old royal stronghold consist of some fifty old pensioners assailed by 10,000 combatants with 100,000 armed men at their back. No " victims of arbi- trary power" rescued " from the rack, torture, and secret dungeons." But, as against these, veritable acts of canni- balism perpetrated by the conquerors ; defenceless wretch- es strung up to lamp-irons, hacked to pieces with sabres ; heads and hands chopped off, bloody hearts carried through the streets, and corpses dragged by the feet by torchlight at night. This is what Barras saw and records in the pages where at that period of his life he daily jots down the events he has witnessed. And his account ends with the following words, which fully demonstrate that it was not written as an afterthought : " To-day, Thursday, every- thing is quiet ; still the people are clamoring for further examples, a hunt is being instituted for proscribed heads, and the wicked have cause to tremble." Thirty years have passed. Barras, as early as 1789 an enemy of the Court, has openly declared himself in favor of the Revolution, has played an important part in it, has sat on the benches of the " Mountain," and, the Revolu- • See in Appendix IV., p. 3S7, the extract from the autograph journal of Barras in regard to the taking of the Bastille. This narrative comprises the SIX last pages of the journal, wherein is also to be found the account of the siege of Pondicherry. PREFACE xlix tion having run its course, has ostentatiously wrapped himself up in the proud attitude of an inimitable and inveterate Revolutionary. He gathers together his recol- lections in view of Memoirs he intends to publish, jots down a few notes on paper, and as he is not fond of wield- ing the pen, a neurotic malady not leaving him the free use of his arm, and rendering in the last years of his life his writing, bad as it was, almost undecipherable to him- self, he dictates to his friends MM. Paul Grand and Rous- selin de Saint-Albin fragments of his future Memoirs. In those days the revolutionary version of the taking of the Bastille is officially established. Legend has taken possession of the event, and clothed it with ornaments most proper to excite our admiration and pity. It is henceforth an admitted fact that the fall of the Bastille was due to an heroic impulse of the Paris masses, and its downfall revealed horrible mysteries of iniquity. And, curiously enough, this legend which has so deeply dis- torted the material circumstances and the outer aspect, if it may be said, of the event, was contemporaneous with the event itself: the spontaneous fruit of popular im- agination, sentimentality, and credulity, and not of the subsequent commentaries of historians friendly to the Revolution. No falsification of an historical fact has ever been more flagrant than this one ; but never also was historical falsi- fication more ingenious, more sincere, and possessed of more accomplices. Remember that on the day following that fearful one, when so many worthy folk were slaugh- tered by a populace thirsting for blood, the atrocity of the deed was already vanishing, drowned, swept away by the torrent of general rejoicing. "Where tliere has been no crime, there is no need for pardon," says the Vicomte de Noailles, according to the testimony of Barras himself. One of the principal noblemen of the country was thus absolving the butchery of the previous day. It must be said that the Bastille was not a prison like the others. Ever since its lofty and massive walls had, for centuries, raised themselves over Paris, the Bastille had D 1 I MEMOIRS OF BARRAS gradually ceased to be a thing. It lived a threatening and mysterious life. Such, in days past, that hideous monster the Sphinx, gorged with human blood, squatting at the gates of Thebes. It had become in the eyes of the Parisians a sort of moral person, the docile, pitiless, and silent executor of secular iniquities. It was the material embodiment, the ever-present image, as besetting as a nightmare, of a rifgtme justly execrated more and more day by day. And all this growing hatred which this regime seemed to take pleasure in exciting, in the madness in the midst of which it was seeking to lose itself prior to perishing — all this fury slowly accumulated in the heart of the people, attacked the symbol previous to attacking the system itself, growled with a dull sound, just as the ocean roars around shoals. And that is why, when the Bastille disappeared, swamped by the sudden and terrible ground- wave which, on the 14th of July, 1789, swept against it the Parisian population with the irresistible force of a race — that is why all was forgotten, the violent, murderous, and barbarous deeds of the conquerors. " The Bastille is taken !" This triumphant cry, uttered by Paris, filled France, crossed Europe, and found an echo even on the banks of the Neva. Tears of joy ran down the cheeks of those who heard it ; people who were strangers to one another stopped in the streets of St. Petersburg to impart the good news, to glory in it, and to embrace one another over it. For each one felt confusedly that these words, "The Bastille is taken," carried something fatidical with them ; that this sentence concealed a profound meaning of greater signiiicance than the mere words themselves ; lastly, that in these simple words the funeral knell of the aiteien regime was ringing. Hence the legend is in this case truer than history, for it has marvellously grasped aiid brought into relief the symbolic character of the event — an essential character which those who, in their blind hatred of the Revolution, seek to reduce the taking of the Bastille to the proportions of a simple massacre grossly misappreciate. It was that, 'tis true. But a partial truth is not the PREFACE h truth. Now the taking of the Bastille was not merely a massacre. A grand and noble thing was born on that day. It matters little that it was born in blood. Is it not a law here below that life ever emerges from death? Let us forget the pains of this childbirth, to think only of the fine fruit it gave to the world. The time is ill chosen to speak disparagingly of the taking of the Bastille. Who is there so blind as not to see the danger threatening the inestimable benefit it procured us ? If our stupidity and cowardly apathy allow the new revolution which is an- nounced to make us bend our backs under the level of the bestial collectivist servitude, ah, how we shall bless those who took that Bastille of '89, far less odious than the one which will have taken its place ! God grant that the day does not come when we shall shed tears of pain, regret, and shame when remembering that great day of deliverance, just as the Jews in captivity by the rivers of Babylon wept at the remembrance of Jerusalem ! And I am awaiting them, those for whom it is so great a matter of sentiment to be traditionally moved, on the 14th of July, at the recollection of De Launay — those who con- sider it the proper thing to jeer at the masses dancing on that day in the public squares in memory of that joyous farandole of deliverance which our ancestors danced on the ruins of the accursed prison — I await them then! When they shall be deprived of it, they will see whether liberty is not sweet, and whether those who secured a like benefit for our fathers do not deserve the homage of public gratitude ! However this may be, Barras, having, many years after the event, to speak of it in his Memoirs, either does not recollect the account he wrote in days gone by, or, if he remembers it and finds it in his papers, reads it, I imagine, with a kind of stupor. What, the taking of the Bastille was nothing more than that ! The people showed them- selves, not magnanimous, but cowardly and ferocious ! And it is he, Barras, who would furnish the enemies of the Rev- olution the materials wherewith to blast forever the recol- lection of that glorious day, the mother of the 20th of June, lii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS of the lOth of August, of all the great revolutionary dates ! Can it be possible that he so badly grasped its significance, that he composed this damning account ? So he deliber- ately sets it aside, as being in contradiction with the legend duly accepted by history, and the genuineness of which he, a fervent revolutionary, can deny all the less, that he now himself believes in this legend, and that it has ended in superseding the testimony of his own eyes. He indites a first note : " The Bastille, that place of torture, was attacked and taken. I was one of the assailants ; Lapoype and Fr^- ron also. Its governor, having caused cannon loaded with grape to be discharged, was killed, the Bastille demolished, and several avowed enemies of the people, who had op- pressed them, were also put to death." ' Assuredly, this is less compromising than that unfort- unate account of 1789. But, attenuated as this brief and colorless narrative is, it still makes mention of persons " put to death " by the people. Such recollections must not be suffered to tarnish the splendor of that grand day ! Barras crosses out the passage wherein he has made allusion — so discreet an allusion — to the terrible scenes of slaughter he had described to us in his first account, while the text of the memorandum destined to the Memoirs, erased, care- fully expurgated of anything likely to recall unfortunate incidents, becomes: "The Bastille, that place of torture, was attacked and taken. . . . Its governor caused a dis- charge of guns loaded with grape-shot to be fired. The news of this alarmed the Court." In another memoran- dum, also autographic, Barras thus deals with the event: " The Bastille, that frightful monument of the misdeeds of arbitrary power, was courageously attacked by the people on the 14th of July. Badly defended, it was taken and demolished. This extraordinary occurrence struck terror into the Government."'' And so, from attenuation to attenuation, the Memoirs ' Papers of M. de Saint-Albin. Autograph memorandum of Barras ; accord- ing to the handwriting, it must, like the one following, have been written in the last years of his life. 2 Papers of M. de Saint-Albin. PREFACE liii have ended in giving us in regard to the taking of the Bastille merely the few lines embodied in Chapter VII., a colorless and insipid passage, but agreeing in its common- place form, just as Barras had expressly willed it, with the sentimental and heroic legend of the event, devoid on the contrary of all picturesque, precise, and horrible particulars embodied by him in his early narrative, ere a new and en- tirely different version had emerged from the popular im- agination, and it had been tacitly agreed among all the friends of the Revolution that the recollection of the abom- inable excesses which had soiled the people's first victory was to be forever wiped out. IV. — Barras and the Revolutionary Days of the 5TH AND 6th October, and of the 2oth of June AND loTH of August The reflections one has just read doubtless explain why the remaining eventful days of the Revolution were, just as the taking of the Bastille, mentioned by Barras only in a cursory way ; one seeks in vain to gather from his narra- tives the abundant and precise information the author of the Memoirs nevertheless seemed to have bound himself to furnish, when being careful to inform us that he is tell- ing us of what he saw. But, what is the value of a specta- tor who will not see everything, or remember all he has seen, and his studied deposition derives its inspiration not from a love and respect of truth itself, but from a constant anxiety to present facts in a light favorable to a certain cause ? Now, Barras has, in his Memoirs, constituted him- self the defending counsel of the Revolution ; he pleads, even when he would have us believe that he is content with making a deposition. And this point has, I am of opinion, been sufficiently brought to the light by the sig- nificant after-touches he has just been shown to have in- dulged in with regard to his own narrative of the taking of the Bastille. Did he indite a narrative of the events of the Sth and liv MEMOIRS OF BARRAS 6th of October, of the 20th of June, of the lOth of August, just as he did of the 14th of July ? 'Tis possible, nay proba- ble, if one considers that even previous to 1789 he was in the habit of putting into writing his impressions on any notable event coming under his notice. But such narra- tive, if ever it existed, has not fallen into my hands. And the autographic memoranda of Barras bearing on those eventful days, which I have been able to find among the papers of M. de Saint-Albin, furnish as meagre information as the corresponding passages of the Memoirs derived from them.' Be this as it may, the narrative of Barras in regard to the 5th and 6th of October, the 20th of June, and loth of ^ Autographic memorandum of Barras in regard to the ^th and tth of Octo- ber : " The enemies of the Revolution are actively engaged in sowing discord. 'Tis their manoeuvres, the opposition of the nobles and priests, the arming of imigrh under cover of the tlags of the Powers which are the cause of all the excesses committed ; they fully justify the nation's actions. On the 5th of October there was a scarcity of bread in Paris. . . . The people start from Paris in spite of M. de Lafayette. . . . No hostile intention animated them ; bayonets were opposed to them ; an officer of the gardes du corps struck some citizens with his sword. . . . The wounding of the citizens was followed by the discharge of a musket which broke the arm of the officer who had commit- ted the deed. As a result, excesses were committed. . . . The chateau was stormed and invaded ; the gardes du corps defended it, and those of them who fired were killed. . . . The king took advantage of a moment of calm to say that he and his family would accede to the desires of the people. . . . The national guards as well as the Assembly escorted the king as far as Paris. . . . There was once more an abundance of bread." Autographic memorandum of Barras on the 20th of June : "On the 20th of June the people proceeded to the chateau. The king dons the red cap, the Assembly disbands the royal guard. Paris is in greater ferment than the provinces. ... It might perhaps have been better policy to leave the king full liberty. . . ." Autographic memorandum of Barras on the 10th of August .- "The people, pressed by the danger of the foreign armies marching on Paris, by the daring of the enemies at home, thought it incumbent upon them alone to save public liberty. They determined to accomplish the events of the loth of August. The mob wended its way to the chateau ; the Carrousel was occupied, as also other approaches. Parleys took place with the Swiss guarding the court-yard of the chateau. The king had reviewed them the same morning. Mediators who had advanced towards them were fired at through the gates. . . . The chateau was invaded by the people. The king and his family had taken refuge during the fight in the bosom of the National Assembly," etc. PREFACE Iv August, is, just as the one of the taking of the Bastille, in harmony with the pure revolutionary tradition. On the 5th and 6th of October, the people have been stirred up by an orgy of the body-guards. Barras was present at this orgy, just as he doubtless was present at the freeing of the virtuous prisoners of the Bastille, on the 14th of July. Thus stirred up by the blind partisans of the tyrant, the people have merely had recourse to fair reprisals. And how could it be otherwise? Are the people not always magnanimous? Is not their inborn generosity to be met with even in the manifestations of their anger? No article of the revolutionary creed is more solidly estab- lished than that one. Hence Barras reverentially throws a veil over all particulars of a nature to show us that the public order, the laws, and humanity were equally and outrageously violated on these several days, as it is a fact they were. And so the studied prudence of his narrative explains its commonplace." V. — Barras and the 9x11 Thermidor Altogether different and far more interesting is the nar- rative he consecrates to the gth Thermidor.' At thirty years' distance he enjoys recalling to his mind the remembrance of this great event, to conjure up his own personality, and especially to inform us by what effort ' A couple of interesting remarks are however to be taken notice of. It would seem that on the 20th of June battalions of the National Guard de- voted to the king met in the Rue Saint-Honore and about the Palais-Royal, with the design of defending Louis XVI.; had the king made some display of energy, he might have suppressed the sedition. On the loth of August, as on the 14th of July, the victory of the people was in a great measure due to the fact that soldiers mingled with the mob. - 1 have it from M. Paul Grand, the godson and intimate friend of Barras, whom, as it has been seen, I have had the honor of consulting in regard to the Memoirs, that there was no period of his political life to which Barras re- ferred with greater complacency in the course of conversation. M, Paul Grand told me that the portion of the Memoirs bearing on the gth Thermidor was put into shape, in part from the very notes of the ex-Director, and in part from the recollections repeatedly evoked by Barras, in the course of his lengthy conversations. Ivi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS of energy and coolness he became the providential man called for by the occasion. He sees himself once more, and complacently depicts himself to us such as he was then, or such as he believes he was — calm, firm, and collected in the thick of the crisis, taking under his pro- tection the Assembly lost in fear, bravely grappling with the tyrant, with the monster, finally hurling Robespierre to the ground. Thus St. George striking down the dragon. But then the 9th Thermidor is the great scene of the political role of Barras. An ambitious and clever actor, but who had so far not found the coveted opportunity of coming forth in a leading role, he played this great scene marvellously well, with all the emotional power, partly sincere, partly factitious, derived from his Southern nature, with all the pathetic grimacing, all the emphasis and grandiloqirence which is to the taste of the day, and suited indeed to the denouement of a like drama. Sustained by the situation, truly one of the most tragic it is possible to conceive; intoxicated with the unexpected importance his personage of Saviour of Liberty has suddenly as- sumed ; rejoicing, as an actor making his debut, at seeing at last the eyes of a whole nation converging upon him- self, Barras has found striking attitudes, superb gestures, and " words intended for effect." ' He has equalled Talma ; and he has at once soared to the highest heaven, and won the favors of popularity, a hussy he had been courting for four long years, and who, from a wanton's caprice, had up to that time persistently refused to surrender her charms to him, do what he might. What a rapture for this vainglorious Provencal to be popular, nay, more than popular. For, on that day, Glory, the dupe of his heroic 'See chap. xix. : " I go to my post, remain at yours.*' (Words alleged to have been addressed by Barras to the Convention just as he was leaving the Assembly to march against Henriot, with the decree outlawing the latter in his hand.) *' ' Come, citizen Fouquier,' / exclaimed in loud, but cold and imperious tones, ' the National Convention has commissioned me to see to the execution of its orders. I was surrounded and interrogated ; I replied: ' Tkey (Robespierre and his partisans) are dead ere they have been stricken ! ' " PREFACE Ivii posturing, lightly touched with her lips his victorious brow. He would forever like to feel the imprint of that kiss. Now, never again did he taste the sweetness of those chaste lips, which bestowed that kiss on him by an inadvertence. No, never again indeed ; not even in Ven- d^miaire, when another wretched little swarthy Corsican, lean and in threadbare coat, supplanted him— who would have believed it! — him the superbly beplumed Thermi- dorian victor. Since then he has fain had to be content with turning the light brains of women and the mob, with making himself agreeable to the populace and to Mdlle. Lange, triumphs cut to the measure of his deserts. But Barras has preserved the memory of this noble kiss which had gone astray in his direction, of this unique kiss which he did not deserve ; and he finds again something of its fleeting and vanished sweetness by narrating to us in pompous fashion ' the imaginary prowess to which he owed it. It was in his indiscreet and boastful nature to be unable to refrain from making public any piece of good luck, even if it had no aftermath, as in the case of that short meeting of the gth Thermidor with Glory, a mistress of too high degree for this vulgar seducer, and one whose inconstancy was shortly and for a lengthy period to be held captive by another, more worthy of her, the hero with the eagle eye and Caesar's profile. So then Barras has returned from the south, where the Convention had intrusted him (April, 1793) with a mission near the Army of Italy. He has " pacified " the rebellious departments of the Basses-Alpes, Bouches-du- Rhone, and Var.° It is only too well known how many deeds of violence, executions, and butcheries are embodied in that gentle word, in the year of terror, 1793. Barras pacified, as pacifying went in those days, with sword and 'The gth Thermidor constitutes "the most colossal, the most decisive event of modern times, not only for France, but for Europe and the whole human race. ..." '* The battle of the gth Thermidor may be compared with all those fought on the frontier against the coalition. . . ." "It will furnish an eternal theme for conversation to future generations. . . ." (Chap, xix.) ■ See chaps, xiv. , xv., and xvi. Iviii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS flame ; and yet he is uneasy. There is no doubt that he has proved himself a good revolutionary when on this mission. And he has taken all the greater care to shine as such, as it is necessary for him to wipe out at all cost the original sin of having been born an aristocrat, where- by he is open to suspicion. He has therefore outdone even the zeal of his colleagues, has ranted and spouted more noisily than Freron, flattered still more servilely the " popular societies," exercised fearful reprisals against the rebels, terrorized " Sans Norn," deluged the unfortunate " Port de la Montagne " ' with blood, and, lastly, exter- minated this rising Provengale Vendue. Now, one who has thus fulfilled his mandate can return to Paris carrying high his head. True, but Barras has not contented himself with paci- fying Provence. Equivocal dealings are intermingled with his revolutionary prowess. Barras has laid a hand on the confiscated property of flying proscripts or victims of the cruel Jacobinical reaction whose executor he has just been ; 'tis a delicate and grasping hand, made not to sign bloodthirsty decrees — it has, nevertheless, signed them — but to thrill with pleasure at the contact of the silken tresses of lovely girls, and the trickling of gold through its fingers. He has speculated with contractors, sold his influence and" protection, indulged in dishonorable dab- bling in a thousand ways, just as he will do all his life. The man, fond of pleasure and of money, already pierces the garb of the demagogue donned for the nonce ; and from the elegant and supple person of this Jacobinical vicomte there exudes the flavor of venality and corrup- tion eternally bound up with his name in history." Pro- vencal patriots — simple folk they, who have got no further ' Names given to Marseilles and Toulon, in punishment of their participa- tion in the Federalist insurrection. Barras and Freron unnamed Marseilles on their own authority. — Hamel, Histoirc de Robespierre, vol. iii., p. 401. '" Barras was voluptuous and intriguing. . . . His conscience seemed to have no fear of fishing in troubled waters. It would be difficult to calumniate this equivocal and suspicious individual. . . ."■ — De Lescure, Mimoires stir les Journ^es revolutionnaires , vol. i., pp. xl. and xli. PREFACE lix than the conception of an austere republic served by men with the cleanest of hearts — have heard of the illicit profits the representative has derived from his mission. They have denounced him in Paris." And, if Barras is uneasy, in spite of the pledges he has given of the ardor of his revolutionary convictions, it is that he has in his mind the redoubtable man whom he will have to face after the Com- mittee of Public Safety and the Convention, that Robes- pierre whose cold and haughty glance is about to rest on him, and search the deepest recesses of his vicious soul. Robespierre does not like prevaricators. And those whom Robespierre does not like rarely grow old. It so happens that at this very moment " the Incor- ruptible " is thinking of purging the Republic of that vermin which has fastened on its body, soiling and eating into it, the corrupt. Tallien, " that belly all for guzzling and wenches " ; ' Fouche, that " ugly-looking scoundrel,' whose atrocious face was less so than his soul";' Carrier, that bloodthirsty satrap who " lives in a seraglio sur- rounded by insolent sultanas"; 'Courtois, thief and forger;" ' See the Moniteur of the 6th Vendemiaire, Year III. (27th September, 1794), in regard to the sitting of the Convention of the 2d Vendemiaire. The representative Ruamps asks that letters wherein Barras and Freron are accused of pilfering be read. The exactions of Barras and Freron are like- wise denounced by Bar^re in his M/moires (vol. iv., p. 14). One also finds, in a rather poor work, moreover, entitled Amours et Aventtires du Vicomte de Barras (Paris, 1817): "Sent on mission in the south, his coffers were quickly filled and his debts paid " (vol. ii. , p. 1S7). I merely quote for form's sake this work of no historical value, but wherein lovers of tittle-tattle will find sufficient to gratify their taste, when reading the account of the amours of the gallant viscount with Mme. Tallien and Mme. de Beauharnais. ^ Michelet, Revolution, vol. vii., p. 122. 'Words spoken by Dupont de I'Eure about Fouche, and quoted by Hamel, Histoire de Robespierre, vol. iii. , p. 629. * Hamel, vol. iii., p. 395. ' Letter from Julien to Robespierre, quoted by Hamel, vol. iii., p. 398- = He had distinguished himself by his pilfering in Belgium when on mission, and was on those grounds summoned by an order signed by Robes- pierre to appear before the Committee of Public Safety. Later he was ex- cluded from the Tribunate for fraudulent dealings in cereals. His famous report on the gth Thermidor is, as shown by Hamel (vol. iii., pp. 655-660), nothing else than an impudent historical falsification. Ix MEMOIRS OF BARRAS that drunkard Freron, the accomplice of Barras in the exe- cutions of the south ; ' all these men whose hands, accord- ing to the forcible expression of Robespierre himself, " are full of plunder and blood";' Robespierre knows them, watches them, and is preparing to trap them. " I cannot endure this state of things; my heart bursts when I think that in the midst of our victories never has the Republic run so many dangers. / must perish or deliver it from the rogues and traitors who are compassing its ruin." ' ' See chap. xiv. of the Memoirs for the portrait Earras furnishes us of his friend : "The use of spirits, the excited state of mind derived therefrom, gave him a daring and an almost warlike intrepidity. This, coupled with a most decided character, viaiie of him an excellent revolutionary," • Paraphrasing the utterance of his friend, Couthon spoke in a similar strain to the Jacobins on the 6tli Thermidor of the men "whose hands are full of the riches of the Republic, and from which drop the blood of the inno- cents they have slaughtered." ^ Words spoken by Robespierre to one of his friends on the eve of the famous sitting of the Convention of tlie 8th Thermidor (see Hamel, vol. iii., p. 720). This return of Robespierre to ideas of moderation and clemency is testified to by Barras himself in a most important autographic fragment to be found at the end of this volume ; it confirms in a striking fashion the thesis of M, Ernest Hamel as to the original causes of the 9th Thermidor (see Appendix, No. VII.). " He and his colleagues were desirous of reverting to principles of moderation. He declared himself against pilferers, contractors, and scaffolds. This was the time chosen by the members of the Committees to unpopularize him. He was called a moderate, and perished like the worthy Camille Desmoulins, Danton, Bazire, and the other deputies who sought to put an end to the executions, the terror, and authority of the Committees. . . ." This significant homage rendered by Barras himself to his victim has disappeared in the editing of the Memoirs. It seems to me of interest, and but fair to give it a place here. And this is one of the reasons which determined me to publish in the Appendix this autographic fragment of Barras, in spite of the confusion, disorder, and repetitions which will be noticed in it. I freely admit that the autographic account is on some points at variance with the text itself of the Memoirs, See especially what is said in both in regard to the famous letter of Charlotte Robespierre, quoted by Courtois in his report. A violent enemy of Robespierre, M. de Saint- Albir, has conformed more faithfully in his editing with the rancorous Thermidorian tradition than has Barras himself in his personal notes. It is with me a simple matter of historical probity to point out the difference between the two versions. Having fulfilled this duty, I hasten to add that this is the first case of infidelity I have come across in the editing when comparing with the text of the Memoirs the autographic notes of Barras which I have found in the papers of M. de Saint-Albin. PREFACE Ixi And, with the object of reaching them all the more surely and quickly, he causes to be voted the terrible law of the 22d Prairial, directed precisely, in his secret thoughts, against the men guilty of peculation and the butchers who disgrace the Republic. The first thing Barras does, therefore, on his return to Paris is to go and do obeisance to Robespierre in his little house in the Rue Saint-Honor6,' where the inflexible tribune of the people sets the example of a simplicity and purity of moral principles which must have caused to smile " the corrupted one par excellence, whose drawing- room will become the beloved asylum and centre of all that was most cynical and impure."' Far from me to destroy the bloom, by analyzing them here, of the pages teeming with picturesque and precise particulars, wherein Barras tells us of his visit to the upright man he dreads as his judge. The freezing reception, the persistent silence of Robespierre, the look of contempt he casts upon the impudent personage who comes and disturbs the retreat where he is in meditation — putting a finishing polish to sentences, the unhappy man ! — the salvation and regener- ation of the Republic by one bold stroke. Therein are traits it is the duty of history to gather up, and we must be grateful to Barras for having transmitted them to us. It is readily understood that a man thus treated should have seen that his only chance of salvation lay in the death of Robespierre. And, when it is remembered that there were several of them in the same predicament — Fouche, Tallien, Freron, and others— the profound causes of the 9th Thermidor are suddenly revealed to us. Then does the downfall of Robespierre appear to us such as it actually was : not the work of a reaction of the pubhc conscience against the rtfgime of the Terror, as it has so long and so wrongfully been taught, but the result of a 1 Barras, and after him M. Ernest Hamel, believe that this house was demolished. M. Victorien Sardou is of opinion that it still stands, that it was not demolished, but merely raised, and that it nowadays bears No. 398 in the Rue Saint-Honore.— See Le Figaro, literary supplement, nth August, jgg^ « Hamel, Histoire de Robespierre, vol. u\., p. 399- kii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS trap cleverly set by all the corrupt ones for the Incor- ruptible, by all the men of prey, who made their living out of the Terror, for the undeceived Terrorist seeking to stem "the terrible course of the Revolution." ' The three lengthy chapters " devoted to the tragedy of the gth Thermidor are therefore one of the most interest- ing portions of the first volume. This account of the gth Thermidor, in harmony with the pure Thermidorian tradi- tion, and most hostile consequently to Robespierre, none the less constitutes, in spite of its being rather an expres- sion of the burning hatred of the victorious factions than of the truth, an important contribution to the history of the event which buried Robespierre and the Republic in one and the same grave. Robespierre dead, the heroic age is a thing of the past.' Power passes into the hands of an impure coterie of men steeped in vices and crimes. Directorial corruption is free to expand on this dunghill, until comes the day when Bonaparte, realizing by aid of other means and with another object the supreme thought of Robespierre, Bonaparte — whom I do not consider I am insulting when I recall here that he was the friend and par- tisan of the upright tribune ■" — will sweep away all this filth. VI. — The 13TH Vendemiaire and the early con- nection OF Barras with Bonaparte The 13th Vendemiaire, likewise included in the volume ' The utterance is Bar^re's, and was spoken by him at the sitting of the gtli Thermidor. On the previous day Robespierre had said : " Is it we who have cast patriots into cells, and carried terror into all conditions of life? It is the monsters whom we have accused. Is it we . . . who have declared war on peaceable citizens, made crimes of incurable prejudices or matters of little import, in order to discover guilty ones everywhere, and to render the Republic an object of dread to the masses themselves ? . . ." — Robespierre's speech, 8th Thermidor. * Chaps, xvii., xviii., and .xi.x. 'At home, at least. With the armies, it continues and will continue to the last day of the Revolution — i.e., up to 1815. * See the remarkable opinion expressed by Napoleon on Robespierre : "The true scapegoat of the Revolution." — Memorial, chap, ii., i8th Novem- ber, 1815. PREFACE Ixiii about to be read, has, just as the 9th Thermidor, been honored with plenty of amphfications." Barras, need I say so, conscientiously endeavors to prove that " the con- queror of Thermidor " was on a par with himself in this new crisis, and that liberty, threatened once more, is in- debted for a fresh victory to the activity, resolution, sang- froid, and military talents he displayed. An energetic and skilful soldier, as magnanimous as he was valiant, such did the general-in-chief of the Army of the Interior reveal himself. 'Tis Barras himself who says so. Would you doubt the word of a nobleman ! Did we merely find here a new trait of the conceit there has already been occasion to call attention to, we might remain content to smile and pass on. What complicates and aggravates his case is that he denies to another, who perhaps had a better right thereto than himself, the small- est part of the praise he so lavishly awards himself. Let us grant that Barras did everything on this occasion as he pretends ! We are not going to quarrel with him on that score. But it is somewhat surprising to learn that, com- pared with the splendid rijle which the chief attributes to himself on the 13th Venddmiaire, the role of the lieuten- ant was null, effaced, and colorless, as the Memoirs ex- pressly state, when one is aware that the name of that lieutenant was Napoleon Bonaparte. This is the proper place to deal with the question con- cerning the amount of belief to be placed in the testimony, or — to set aside this word, out of place here, primarily conveying as it does an idea of justice — the slanders of Barras against Napoleon. The first relations between Bonaparte and Barras dated from the time of the siege of Toulon. In his haste, appar- ently, to assume his rQle of protector of Bonaparte, Bar- ras informs us ' that, pleased at a report handed him by the young of^cer after an inspection of the coast of Prov- ence, he promoted him to the rank of captain at the very commencement of the operations. Now, these operations ■ See chap. xxi. ' See chap. xv. Ixiv MEMOIRS OF BARRAS did not begin until the end of August, 1793, whereas in July of the same year Bonaparte, attached to coast batter- ies' service, not by the representative Barras, but by one of his former chiefs, General Duteuil, was writing to the Min- ister, in his capacity of captain in the fourth regiment of artillery, in order to obtain the stores of war needed by him for " burning the despots' ships ": ' this mot, coming from the pen of the future Emperor Napoleon, seems to me, in its sincerity, a delicious bit of irony. No more importance than is necessary need be attrib- uted to this inaccuracy in regard to the first reference to Bonaparte: still a witness — since Barras lays claim to being one — who commits a mistake at the very outset of his deposition most justly falls under the ban of suspicion. Let us proceed with our perusal of the chapter. We gather from it that Bonaparte had some time previously indited "an infernal screed, ... a monument of the most cynical Jacobinism," the cost of fhe printing of which he neglected liquidating, although a " gratuity " had been granted him for that purpose by the representatives. I beg the reader will cast his eye over this "infernal screed."" The Soiiper de BeaHcaire, indited by Bonaparte at Avignon in July, 1793, is an impassioned production, breathing the purest patriotism and an ardent love of the Revolution, which, moreover, Napoleon never denied hav- ing loved — loved as people loved it in those grand and tragic years of extreme danger and enthusiasm : " There were good Jacobins. There was a time when every man possessed of any loftiness of soul was bound to be one. I was one myself, like so many other honest folk.'" M. lung, who is not in the habit, as is well known, of flatter- ing Bonaparte, points out in this composition some " curi- ous aphorisms," some " clear and sensible remarks," some ' lung, Bonaparte et son temps, vol. ii. , pp. 324, 325, from the Archives of the War Department. * It is given in full in lung, vol. ii., pp. 354-371. ^ This precious utterance is quoted from Thibaudeau (M^inoires sur le Considat, p. 59) by Frederic Masson, on p. x. of the Introduction to his fine and learned work, NapoUon et les femmes. PREFACE Ixv " concise judgments revealing the precision of the master and the warrior," some "marvellous qualities."' So these are the pages denounced as " a monument of the most cynical Jacobinism " by the same man who a few days later wrote to the Convention: "Send Brunet before the Revolutionary Tribunal. . . . The time for indulgence has gone by. One must guillotine, or expect to be guillotined one's self. ... So off at once with all guilty heads. . . ."" This despatch, I must confess, nowise shocks me. Ap- plied to a like period, the sentimental arguments of to- day seem to me altogether out of season, somewhat silly even, to speak my whole mind. Humanity is and must be the charming luxury of peaceable periods. It was out of place in so critical a juncture. No humanity is shown in a duel unto death. Let us therefore cease reproaching these folk for the little store they set on the lives of others. Many of them held their own just as cheaply, and thought it just as simple and facile a matter to die as to kill. Atro- cious and bloodthirsty as much as you please, their meth- od contributed none the less with sovereign efficacy to the salvation of the Fatherland. Speaking of Jourdan, who has beaten a retreat, Joubert — so, at any rate, Barras tells us — is alleged to have exclaimed : " There's a general who can no longer sit his horse since the dread of the Com- mittee of Public Safety no longer sits behind him." ' A valuable utterance, throwing as it does into light the virt- ue of the scaffold. The scaffold ! Such was the sinister vision suddenly meeting the gaze of every general who felt inclined to look behind. Forward, then ! " Victory or death !" was no vain word, no harmless rhetorical di- lemma. And verily, there was less danger in facing the bayonets of the enemy than about the table covered with green baize round which deliberated those redoubtable men, who with a word sent flying the heads of generals guilty of not having known how to snatch Victory, and to ' lung, vol. ii., p. 372. 5 Archives du Ministere de la Guerre, despatch from Barras, 29th August, j,.„, 3 Mimoires de Barras, vol. ii., chap. xvi. E — I Ixvi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS continue living after so great a crime. Let humanity veil its face, if so it pleases, in shame at these deeds. Patriot- ism has no right to disown them — under penalty of dis- owning itself — for they were more frequently, in their sub- lime horror, nothing else than the furious expressions of the purest love of Fatherland. And it constitutes for me, on my soul and conscience, an insoluble problem to know whether in those days I would have been on the side of the " victims " or on that of the " executioners." Hence I do not censure Barras for having insisted on the most ter- rible measure of repression against traitors, especially at a time when an abominable crime like the handing over of Toulon to the English had just been perpetrated. But I find myself inquiring where the Montagnard representa- tive, Paul Barras, derives the right of denouncing the " Jacobinism " of the Soiiper de Beaucaire. Let us not seek; he derives it from his hatred. And it is this same hatred — and it alone — which has dictated to him the remaining portion of the chapter. Whence would he have drawn, but from that source, the strange and un- expected revelation it makes us of the physical resem- blance of Bonaparte and Marat ? As for moral analogies, they are supplied by the Marquis de Sade; the same thirst for blood, Barras asserts, exists in the " divine Mar- quis" and in the " Corsican ogre," as will be said, later on, in 1 8 14, in the edifying royalist literature which will blos- som under the aegis of the invasion. Barras is severe tow- ards De Sade, when comparing him to such a monster as Napoleon. Does the ingrate not remember that pretty copy oi Justine, \\\\\c\v the author conceived the polite idea of offering to each one of the members of the Directorate — who did not betray the bad taste of showing themselves scandalized at the gift — a gift that General Bonaparte on his return from Egypt, like a savage unable to appreciate the graceful pursuits of imagination, cast to the flames, when the marquis conceived the unfortunate idea of like- wise favoring him with it?" Barras has much yet to tell. ' See Biographic Universclle, Didot.vol. xlii. , p. 298, under the head of De Sade. PREFACE Ixvii He has preserved the recollection of Bonaparte's servility to the representatives,' as well as the " peremptory and decisive" tone which the young officer is alleged to have indulged in when addressing his superior, General Dugom- mier. It will be noticed here that there is a contradiction somewhere. Of course, I am not ignorant of the astound- ing theatrical powers, of the supple and perfidious charm of manner Bonaparte knew so well how to display when he wished to captivate — or deceive. Of the two things Barras here reproaches him with, I am rather inclined to believe the second. It is no effort to me to credit the stiff- ness of the imperious tone, revealing the master even in those early days. On the other hand, I have my doubts about the humility of his attitude towards " those stupid fools " that " breed of ignoraHtacci," as twenty years later he styled, in the presence of O'Meara, the representatives of the Convention attached to the armies. And it is not Bonaparte alone whom Barras attacks in >this chapter full of venomous spite. Lucien Bonaparte is likewise dragged in by the heels. Pending the time when all the remaining members of the Bonaparte family are to be insulted in their turn, as they will be, one and all, in the course of the Memoirs, Barras tells us that Lucien, " a keeper of stores at Saint- Maximin, whose name he had caused to be changed to that of Marathon," indulged in the recreation, in 1793, of profaning the holy vessels and the hosts. A revolutionary pastime, the taste for which was apparently shared in common by all the members of that Bonaparte family, since, if we had to believe Lewis Goldsmith, the future author of the Concordat is alleged to have preluded his work of religious pacification "by defiling a ciborium " at Toulon.' Did Barras by any chance study Goldsmith? And may it not perhaps be but a simple reminiscence of the Histoire secrete die cabifiet de NapoUon Bonaparte, which made him credit the younger brother with the strange exploit credited by the vile Eng- ' See chap. xvi. « Histoire secrete du cabinet de Napolion Boitaparte et de la coiir de Saint- Cloud, by Lewis Goldsmith. Paris, 1S14, 2 vols, in 8vo.— See vol. i., p. 69. Ixviii MEMOIRS OF'BARRAS lish pamphleteer to the turpitude of the elder? It must be admitted that this conjunction is an unfortunate one. It proves, indeed, that the libel of Goldsmith and the Me- moirs of Barras have their origin in the same fixed reso- lution to defame, and have recourse to the same methods of systematic disparagement and insult. With this obser- vation, whose importance can escape no impartial mind, I will conclude my analysis of the account given by Barras of his early connection with Bonaparte. VII. — The Role of Bonaparte at the Siege OF Toulon That Bonaparte resembles Marat physically,' the Mar- quis de Sade morally ; that he should, with an eagerness wherein Barras discovers the calculations of the most Machiavellian ambition, have picked up the gloves or the fan of the representative Ricord, held the bridle or the stirrup for that gentlewoman when she was mounting her horse, constitutes such manifestly childish prattle that I am almost ashamed to have dwelt on it. It is altogether different in regard to the information supplied to us by the Memoirs as to the part played by Bonaparte at the siege of Toulon. Barras played a part, a most honorable part, it must be granted, at the siege of Toulon. It is only fair to do hom- age to the energy of the measures taken by his orders at the outset of the rebellion, to his activity, to the valor he gave proof of when exposing himself like a common sol- dier, his representative's sword in hand, at the time of the great attack of the 17th of December against the positions of the enemy about Faron. Dugommier, who bore no good-will towards the representatives," calls attention to ' Is it necessary to state that M. Lanfrey — to whom the manuscript of the Memoirs of Barras was communicated — hastens to talcc note of this resem- blance between Bonaparte and Marat?— Sec "Lsinhey, Histoire de Napoleon, V0I. i,, p. 72. * He complains with a certain bitterness of their continual interference PREFACE IxiX his courageous behavior in his report on the siege of Tou- lon in the following terms : " The people should see their representatives, in the midst of a most severe night, set- ting an example of steadfastness and devotion during the combat. Saliceti, Robespierre the Younger, Ricord, and Freron were on the promontory of L'Eguillette, while Bar- ras was on the mountain of Le Faron : we were all volun- teers together. This heroic and fraternal ensemble was well calculated to win victory." ' Barras might indeed be proud of having obtained such praise, coming from such a man. In the course of the fearful reprisals the Republicans indulged in towards the traitorous city, after having re- taken it by prodigies of heroism, Paul Barras, to tell the truth, was in nowise the moderate, clement, and even ten- der conqueror he pretends he was in his Memoirs. An eye-witness of the massacres, which more cruelly even at Toulon than at Lyons soiled the grand victory of the troops of the Convention, asserts that Barras personally presided over pne of these butcheries." Let us not forget the retaking of Paris from the mobs of the Commune twenty-four years ago. However execrable the crime of the Commune in 1871 appears to our eyes, it is not equal to the one committed by Toulon in 1793. It was a lesser with the direction of the operations : " 'Tis no longer a single head that com- mands ; all heads having any authority take a hand in the game, and yet, wlien the game is lost, only the head of the unfortunate general is answerable. . . ." — Archives of t/ie IVar Department. Dugommier's letter to the Minister Bou- chotte, loth December, 1793. ^ Dugommier's report, from Toulon headquarters, 6th Nivose, Year II. (26th December, 1793). — Archives of the IVar Department. ^ The author of the manuscript notes from which I take this serious depo- sition has unfortunately remained anonymous. He is a good Republican, and apparently belonged to the army which reconquered Toulon. The following is the passage concerning Barras; " Tliese poor wretches, most of them igno- rant of the fate in store for them, grouped together in platoons, and asking one another with the greatest confidence and tranquillity what it all meant, were all slaughtered, on a signal given by the representative Bari'as, who pre- sided on horseback over this awful butchery. ... It is in a like way that in- famous men in authority have but too frequently polluted our sublime Revo- lution. . . . " — Papers of M. de Saint-Albin. Ixx MEMOIRS OF BARRAS crime, and yet its expiation was almost as terrible. I should consider it unfair to censure Barras for a severity which I excuse in those whom stress of circumstances re- cently compelled to have recourse in Paris to like methods. Civil war, ever like unto itself, has ever been hideous from the time of the most far-off ages ; it is the criminal madness of men, sons of one common country, who at certain periods rush at and tear one another to pieces ; 'tis the execrable inheritance of Cain killing Abel, a parti- cle of which we all carry in our veins, driving us to shed with greater joy the blood of our brethren than that of our enemies themselves ; 'tis all sowers of germs of hatred, all apostles of social discord whom I curse ; 'tis not those who, commissioned by the Fatherland at bay to save it at all costs, roughly accomplish their rough task, and victori- ous, still warm with the infamous struggle, measure the fulness of the penalty by the enormity of the crime. Thus did Barras at Toulon.' I do not seek to know whether he continued smiting after the battle was over — as demanded moreover the justice without bowels of the Convention. Peace to his memory, peace to and silence over the memory of all in regard to this bloody page of their history. Where can we find the right of condemning these terrible deeds, we who but yesterday committed sim- ilar ones? Whatever the part played by Barras in the repression, the account he gives us of the siege itself should derive a ' Should this point not seem to be sufficiently established by the anony- mous note above quoted, I might invoke the testimony of Barras himself, if not in his Memoirs, then in the Official Despatches, signed by him in con- junction with his colleagues: "They (the allies) entered here as traitors; they maintained themselves as cowards; they left as scoundrels. . . , The national vengeance makes itself felt. Wholesale shooting takes place. Already all the naval officers have been exterminated. The Republic shall be avenged in a manner worthy of it; the manes of the patriots shall be appeased. ..." " The nation's justice is meted out daily and in an exemplary fashion. . . . Every one in Toulon connected with the navy, the army of rebels, and the civil and mili- tary administration, has been shot, . . ." — Archives of the War Department Despatches of the 30th Frimaire and 3d Nivose sent to the Committee of Public Safety by the representatives Freron, Saliceti, Robespierre the Young- er, Ricord, and Barras. PREFACE Ixxi special importance from the fact of his being both a wit- ness of and an actor in it. Did Bonaparte conceive the plan whose execution brought about the downfall of the rebel city? Or did he merely co-operate with well-taken measures of a technical order to the success of the plan . conceived by another? Or again, did he do no more than the rest of the officers serving with him ? Of these three opinions, the first adopted by Thiers,' the second by MM. Krebs and Moris," the third by Colonel Iung,Svhich is the one which will be able to derive a strengthening argument from the Memoirs? This will doubtless seem of greater importance than to know if Barras actually caused a new coat to be delivered to Bonaparte in place of the one out at elbows which the future emperor then wore.* Oh, that coat out at elbows, that heroic vestment, despised by Bar- ras ! How is it that that man did not understand that this wretched coat of Captain Bonaparte at the siege of Toulon would appeal even more eloquently to our hearts than the gorgeous coronation mantle I He has thought to lessen Na- poleon by unmasking to us his poverty at the outset of his career. How far poorer is not this calculation of a petty and clumsy hatred ! For the Hero seems all the greater to us both in this coat full of holes and in the redingote grise of 1 814. Here is, if I mistake not, a simple particular which foreshadows already the spirit in which the Memoirs are going to lay before us the role of Napoleon at Toulon. This role is summed up, according to Barras, in three military blunders. A stranger to the conception of the plan, the honor of which is attributed to the general-in- chief, Bonaparte remained a stranger even to the execu- tion of this plan, or participated in it only to clumsily compromise a combination whose assured success would, but for this " stupid blunder," ' have rendered more deci- ' Thiers,./?/OT&^'»«/ro«f3!> (Paris, 1825), vol. vi., p c,ortseq. 2 Campagne dans les A Ipes pendant la Kivolution, 1792-1793. i vol. in 8vo, with Bve sketches. ' Bonaparte et son temps, vol, ii., p. 394- * See chap. xvi. of the Memoirs. • This astounding word has not been given a place in the Memoirs, great- ly to my regret ; but it appears in an autographic memorandum of Barras, Ixxii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS sive the triumph of the army of the Convention. All that Barras is willing to attribute to Bonaparte is the fact of his having given " some proofs of his military talent just begin- ning to develop itself," and of having shown " precocious dispositions in the art of war." Sum total, a fairly gifted officer, active, and with a certain amount of intelligence, but whose role on this occasion was merely a " secondary " one. The veritable "captor" of Toulon, 'tis Dugommier. Now how could it be otherwise? Who is this shabby little Corsican endowed with a soul of fire, impatiently chafing at subordinate roles, hungering after glory, prelud- ing at Toulon by a first manifestation of his genius to the great destinies, an obscure presentiment of which that soul had even then ? Oh, not in the least ! On the contrary, a mean intriguer, who, three years previous to marrying Mme. de Beauharnais from motives of sordid ambition, seeks already to pave his way with women as his auxilia- ries. Soldiers of the battery of the Hommes-Sans-Peur (the Know-No-Fear), who saw him at your side under the hail-storm of iron raining from the Mulgrave redoubt, as you had seen him a few days before pointing " with his heroic hands"' the guns remaining standing in the Brd- gaillon battery, ploughed and razed by the thousands of balls vomited on it by the English ships — what do you say to this, ye companions in arms of Bonaparte at Toulon ? At Toulon, as later on the 13th Vend^miaire, Bona- parte's role would be therefore null. This is precisely what is asserted, subject to a few shades only in the harsh- ness of the criticism, by the military writers whose names I have just mentioned. Colonel lung has no hesitation in saying that at Toulon Bonaparte " owed whatever impor- tance he had to his activity, and especially to his intimacy with his compatriot Saliceti. . . . He discharged the duties of artillery commandant of a wing of the army. He had both colleagues and superiors. He was mentioned in de- wherein precise mention is made of the operation th.Tt f.iiled : " Owing to a stupid blunder ot Bonaparte, no Englisli war-ship was sunk at Tonlon." Papers of M. de Saint-Albin. i Victor Hn^o. PREFACE Ixxiii spatches only once, and then together with Arena and Cervoni. . . ." ' In the eyes of Commandant Krebs and M. Moris, authors, like Colonel lung, of a very remarkable and learned work, the services rendered by Bonaparte at the siege of Toulon were " considerable," but " they are of a technical order." His chief merit was to " form with feeble resources a small artillery park which he made the most of." Ashamed of this concession— which, modest as it is. Colonel lung has obstinately refused hospitality — they hasten to add, " as to what concerns the deciding of the plan of attack, Bonaparte would have had little merit in discovering the one acknowledged by all as the right one." Thereby are confirmed the first lines of the passage from which I have taken these quotations : " A veritable legend, of which Bonaparte is the hero, has gradually taken shape in connection with the siege of Toulon. Nothing in official documents justifies it, as Colonel lung has already remarked in Bonaparte ct son temps." " So we have, on the one hand, history which seeks the truth at its own sources, consults authentic documents, and neglects and consequently makes away with none — erudite, serene, and impartial history, represented by the works of MM. lung, Krebs, and Moris, as well as by the Memoirs of Barras, whose conclusions are almost identi- cal with those of M. lung ; on the other, a legend open to suspicion, born of the silly cult of a few " grognards " ' for their idol, and the adroit adulation of Napoleon's courtiers. Let us examine this history, this legend, with no other object than that of reaching the plain and honest truth, and let us show which of the two has spoken falsely. If, perchance, it should happen that when refuting the thesis of Barras, I should succeed in demonstrating likewise the fragility of that of the honorable authors whom I regret ' lung, ii., p. 394- "> Les Campagnes dans les Alpes pendant la Revolution (\^<)2-l^^'i),\>^^j MM. Krebs and Moris, p. 373, note 3. 3 Grognards, grumblers, the sobriquet given to Napoleon's old soldiers. — Translator's note. Ixxiv MEMOIRS OF BARRAS seeing in such bad company, great would, I must confess, be my joy. It is not every day that one has the good fortune to dispose of three errors at one and the same time. The first point on which light is to be shed is the follow- ing one : when did the opinion first arise that the services rendered by Bonaparte at Toulon contained something particular, something inherent to the man and not to the ofhcer's rank, a special importance, going far beyond the measure of the services exigible of a mere captain of artillery, were he the best of his army? It is after the engagement in the Passes of Ollioules (7th September, 1793), where the brave Donmartin, who directed the artillery of the Convention, fell, stricken by a bullet, and exclaiming, " Long live the Republic !" that Bonaparte, a mere captain, was given the command of all the artillery, while retaining his rank. On the 29th of September, the representatives Gasparin and Saliceti are so well pleased with him that they recommend that he be promoted to the rank of major. On the following day, the 30th of September, they write that " Bonna Parte " is " the only artillery captain able to grasp the operations." ' Is not the idea implicitly embodied in the terms here employed by the two representatives that Bonaparte is already at this stage considered fit for something more important than the mere performance of the simple duties of an ordinary officer? To Carteaux, who has fallen into disgrace, succeeds (9th November) General Doppet, himself replaced almost immediately by Dugommier. During the short time spent by Doppet with the army before Toulon, he has seen Bonaparte at work. " I had brought with me from the Army of the Alps a general of artillery, an old and excellent officer, named Duteuil; he went with me on a tour of inspection of the batteries erected prior to my arrival, and I saw with much astonishment and satisfac- tion that this old artillery ofificer commended all the ' lung, vol. ii., p, 386, from the AirMves 0/ the War Department. PREFACE Ixxv measures taken by young Buonaparte, at that time lieu- tenant-colonel of artillery. I take pleasure in stating that this young officer, who has since become the hero of the Italian campaign, displayed, together with his many talents, a rare intrepidity and the most indefatigable activity. Whenever I visited the posts during my stay with that army, I ever found him at his ; if he needed a moment's rest, he would lie down on the ground, wrapped up in his cloak ; he never left his batteries. . . ." ' Five weeks have gone by since Bonaparte has been given command of the artillery. His activity, his bravery, his talents, make him an example to the army. And, at a distance of four years, when the mind of honest Doppet reverts to that Army of Toulon, with which he spent but a short time, he finds ineradicably engraved on his mem- ory the personality of that rare and unique officer. On the 30th of September the enemy makes a sortie with 6000 men, and takes possession of one of the Repub- lican redoubts, spiking its guns. Dugommier, taken by surprise, hurries forward and drives back the English with the impetus of fury. Next day he writes: "I cannot too highly praise the behavior of those of our brothers-in-arms who volunteered to fight ; among those who most distin- guished themselves, and who assisted me in rallying and pushing forward, are the citizens Bonnaparte (sic), com- mandant of artillery. Arena, and Cervoni, adjutants -gen- eral."^ And this report of the general-in-chief is fully confirmed in regard to the conduct of Bonaparte on this occasion, by a letter of the representative Saliceti to his colleagues:^ "It is impossible to speak too highly of the valor of our troops. . . . Our soldiers would perform prodigies if they had officers. Dugommier, Garnier, Mou- ' Mlinoires politique! et militaires dii Geniral Doppet. Carouge, Year V. of the Republic, i vol. in i2mo, pp. 180, iSi. ''Archives of the War Department. — Letter from Dugommier to the Min- ister, nth Frimaire, Year II. (ist December, 1793). 'Archives of the War Department. — Army of the siege of Toulon. Mil- itary correspondence, Year 1793. Letter of the nth Frimaire, Year II. (ist December, 1793). Ixxvi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS ret, and Buonaparte behaved very well." The repre- sentative makes no special mention either of Arena or Cervoni. But he mentions Bonaparte, just as the general- in-chief had already done. On the i6th of December the Republicans attempt a general attack on the enemy's positions. " The fire from our batteries, directed with the greatest talent, warned the enemy of his fate.' Thus Dugommier in his admirable report on the taking of Toulon.' Who then directed the fire of those batteries? To whom, consequently, is this striking homage addressed? Do not ask MM. Krebs and Moris, who do not quote this report. Ask it still less of M. lung, who quotes it, but with the important passage carefully expurgated. Simply ask it of your good sense, of your natural equity, and they will answer you that, be- yond any possibility of doubt, these words are to be ap- plied to Bonaparte. Will M. lung point out perhaps that Bonaparte is not mentioned in it by name? So be it. In that case, however, he will permit me to call his attention to another document, whose clear and precise terms will, I venture to hope, prove satisfactory to him : " / ca?iiiot find words to portray the merit of Bonaparte ; a consider- able amount of science, just as miicli intelligence, and too much bravery, such is a feeble outline of the virtues of that rare officer. 'Tis for thee. Minister, to turn them to the advantage of the Republic.'"' Such is the judgment passed on Bonaparte by the General of Division Duteil, in a letter written the very day after the capture of Toulon, to the Minister of War. How does it happen then that Colonel lung, and after him MM. Krebs and Moris, for whom the Archives of the War Department have no se- crets, should have been unfortunate enough to allow that ■letter to escape their notice — one sufficiently significant, it ' Memoir on the siege of Toulon sent by Dugommier with a letter to the President of the Convention, 6th Nivose, Year II. — Archives of the War Departmetit, Army of Toulon. '' Letter from Duteil, junior. General of Division, to the Minister of War, igth December, 1793. — Archives of the War Department, Army of Toulon. Military correspondence. Year 1793. PREFACE Ixxvii will be admitted— which their probity as historians would have considered it a duty to publish ? For I will never remain content to believe that they deliberately set aside from the suit they bring against the memory of Bonaparte a deposition of such weight for the sole reason that this deposition is favorable to the man whom they accuse. After perusing this report of Dugommier and this letter of Duteil, nothing seems to us more simple, more legiti- mate, than to see the representatives recommend that Bonaparte, a mere captain two months before, be raised to the rank of brigadier-general. They considered that an exceptional recompense, even in those days of rapid pro- motion, was alone fitted to exceptional merit. " The rep- resentatives of the people present at the siege of Toulon, satisfied with the zeal and intelligence of which the cit- izen Bonaparte, a major in the 2d regiment of Artillery, has given proofs by contributing to the surrender of that rebel town, have, by way of a recognition thereof, ap- pointed him brigadier -general, and recommend that the Minister should confirm him in this rank. . . ." ' M. lung has not been able to resist the temptation of insinuating that "solicitations and intrigues" doubtless played a part in this fresh promotion. I beg leave not to discuss the opinion of the learned historian. It completes in the happiest and most logical fashion the judgment — in which Barras would concur — passed by M. lung in the foregoing, anent Bonaparte's role at the siege of Toulon : " He was mentioned once only, and then in conjunction with Arena and Cervoni. He owed all his importance to his activity, and especially to his intimacy with his compa- triot Saliceti. ..." It will be seen now, I am of opinion, what store is to be set on this judgment, and also on the allegations contained in the Memoirs of Barras, in relation to the insignificance of the role of Bonaparte at the siege of Toulon. I have in- terrogated his companions-in-arms, the men under whose ' Provisional decree of the 22d of September, 1793, quoted by lung in a foot-note, vol. ii., p. 395. Ixxviii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS eyes the young officer served at Toulon. They tell us in all simplicity and frankness what they saw. I have pur- posely set aside, as open to the suspicion of not being suf- ficiently disinterested, all depositions not anterior to the Consulate and the Empire. It has been my wish that all testimony invoked by me should be absolutely free from the slightest bias of flattery, that the Captain of Artillery should not derive any benefit from the admiration inspired hereafter by the all-powerful conqueror and master of Europe. This testimony I have taken is all, with but one exception — that of Doppet — from official sources. Before going more deeply into the subject I have asked myself. At what period did one begin to think and say that the role of Bonaparte at the siege of Toulon had been some- thing entirely different from even that of an excellent sub- altern officer? The documents establish with all the clear- ness and preciseness that can be desired that the opinion looked upon as a legend by MM. Krebs and Moris is con- temporaneous with the siege itself; that this legend has a Republican and not a Bonapartist origin, that it was born spontaneously from an admiration inspired by strik- ing merits, to which the whole army had been a witness. This first point set forth, as it has been, with the aid, I repeat, of official documents alone, I will be charitable enough not to dwell with too great an emphasis on the enormity of the assertion of the two conscientious writers whom the fallacious erudition and the prestige of Colonel lung have on this occasion visibly deluded : " Little by little there has sprung up about the siege of Toulon a veritable legend, with Bonaparte as its hero. Nothing hi official dociiiJients justifies it, as already pointed out by Colonel lung." The suspicious contribution brought by the Memoirs of Barras in support of this opinion is not likely to convince readers of good faith. One must resign one's self to the fact. Bonaparte did do something at Toulon. It is hard to understand that a like admission should be a painful one for writers having the honor to belong to that branch of the French army in which Bonaparte, one of themselves, PREFACE Ixxix is reported to have shed some lustre, an army which, fol- lowing upon the undeserved disasters it has met with, it behooves more than ever to show itself careful and jealous of its glories. Colonel lung and Commandant Krebs nev- ertheless consider a like admission beyond their strength. Since it is the love of truth which alone inspires, let us bow down before them. I will gladly believe that this sacrifice they have made to truth — such, at least, as they conceive it — was not accomplished by them without some opposition on the part of their feelings as patriots and sol- diers. But why, then, did they not leave the task to us others who do not wear the uniform ? Civilian contractors for the demolition of the military genius of Napoleon would assuredly not have been found wanting even without them. This was seen full well in 1871, in the matter of the Column. Having settled this account, I will take up the exam- ination of the second point of this study. What, then, did Bonaparte do at Toulon, since it is now established that he did something? In the first place, it was there that he revealed those merits "of a technical order" mentioned by MM. Krebs and Moris. It is not required of me to enter into the detail of the work of Bonaparte in his capacity of com- mandant of the artillery at the siege of Toulon, although this detail, such as I have taken it from the precious Archives of the War Department, be singularly eloquent. I will content myself with bringing into relief the phi- losophy — if I may say it — of all these authentic and scrupulously analyzed documents. What my investiga- tion brings out, clearly demonstrated in my eyes, is what follows : — I. An indefatigable, prodigious, and superhuman ac- tivity creating resources where there are none : " I sent to Lyons, to Briancon, to Grenoble, an intelligent ofificer, whom I summoned' from the Army of Italy, for the pur- pose of procuring from these several towns everything that could be of use to us. I requisitioned the Army of Italy to furnish us with the cannon not needed for the Ixxx MEMOIRS OF BARRAS defence of Antibes and Monaco ... I procured by req- uisition one hundred horses at Marseilles ... I caused to be sent here eight bronze guns from Martigues ... I established at Ollioules an arsenal with forty workn:ien, blacksmiths, wheelwrights, carpenters, all working unceas- ingly at what was necessary to us ... I established a park where men are hard at work making gabions, hurdles, faggots for saps, and fascines ... I called by requisition from Marseilles all workmen engaged in weaving baskets and wicker-work for demijohns, and set them to making gabions. I requisitioned horses from every department, from Nice to Valence and Montpellier. I took from La Seyne and La Ciotat all the timbers I could find ... I am having made 5000 earth-sacks per day at Marseilles ... I established an artificers' workshop ... I have taken steps to re-establish the Dardennes foundry ... I have a gun- smith's workshop where all the muskets are repaired. . . ."' Notice the egotism, the tone of authority. Remember that to this scrupulously precise report is added a plan of attack on Toulon, simple and luminous, to which we shall refer further on. Already does this powerful mind reveal itself in full possession of the marvellous gift it possessed of receiving the smallest details just as it em- braced and dominated the most vast ensemble. Is it the artillery captain Bonaparte who has drawn up these two documents? Or is it the Emperor Napoleon who has dictated to Berthier the minute and comprehensive or- donnance of one of his undertakings? 2. An unfailing quickness in seizing the main point, revealed by the selection of sites for his batteries, always erected by him where they can produce the most redoubt- able effects. 3. An inconceivable boldness in the selection of these sites. To illustrate : the Br^gaillon battery constructed in a single night, within a few fathoms of the sea-shore, under ^Archives of the War Dipartmeni. — Document attached to a " Plan of attack oil Toulon " (published in Napoleon's Correspondence), addressed to the Minister by Bonaparte, from headquarters at Ollioules, 24th Brumaire Year II. (14th November, 1793). PREFACE Ixxxi the very bows of the allied ships ; likewise the battery of the Hommes-Sans-Peur (the Know-No-Fear) constructed with its annexes under the very guns of the big Mulgrave redoubt, "within pistol-shot " of the English positions, says Saliceti with some exaggeration, in his autographic and unpublished account of the siege of Toulon." 4. An indomitable tenacity in the defence and retain- ing possession of these exposed batteries thrown forward like "a forlorn hope." To illustrate: the 20,000 cannon- balls withstood by the two batteries of La Montague and the Sans-Culottes ;'' the still more fearful cannon- ade withstood by Bregaillon' and the Hommes-Sans- Peur.' 5. The genius of acting on the offensive, the terrible de- stroying genius of Napoleon, already manifested itself in this audacious use of siege artillery ; not from a distance, not classically, with a waste and loss of cannon-balls, but muzzle to muzzle, so to speak, in order to increase a hun- dredfold the work of destruction of these batteries. A fearful game, wherein there is a danger of being annihi- lated, but wherein one strikes with terror and one's self an- nihilates the enemy, if one can but hold out a few hours. Compare this method with the one he is to use hereafter on battle-fields, his field artillery all brought to bear on one point, like a pistol pointed at the heart of the enemy : the two methods are identical. If that is what MM. Krebs and Moris understand by the words " merits of a technical order," I am one with them. But who is there who does not see that there is something else, and that something in excess of merits of ^ N'otes autogmphes du repr^sentant Saliceti sur le siige de Toulon. — M. de Saint-Albin's Papers. ^ The figure given by Bonaparte himself in the report above quoted. 5 This battery had to stand the fire of ten ships, two hulks, and two bomb- ketches. ■■ " On the first day, nearly all the gunners were lulled or wounded, hence men could not be found to take their places, whereupon Bonaparte conceived the idea of issuing an order of the day, stating that this new battery was to be called the battery of the Hommes-Sans-Peur ; immediately all gunners wished to belong to it." — Saliceti's Notes. F 1 Ixxxii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS that modest order, however commendable it may be ; that the man who did this is not only an officer thoroughly grounded in the various parts of his profession ; that, in a word, the great captain is beginning to show himself in the mere artillery commandant? And it is on this third point that full light will be thrown, to the confusion of Barras, and not to him alone, by the last portion of this dissertation. A few brief topographical indications become necessary at this juncture. The town of Toulon is commanded on the north by the steep flanks of the Faron Mountain, on which the allies — English, Spaniards, Neapolitans, Pied- montese — had strongly entrenched themselves, as in a kind of natural redoubt. East and west forts pitched in front of the body of the town itself held in check the Re- publican army, whose two divisions — the western one un- der Carteaux, Doppet, then Dugommier, the eastern one under Lapoype — were separated one from the other by the Faron mountain-mass. To the south was the harbor, in the absolute possession of the enemy. This harbor is composed of two distinct parts — the great harbor commu- nicating with the high sea, the small harbor well inland. Betweenthem juts out the promontory of L'Eguillette, oc- cupied — just as Mount Faron and all other heights com- manding the two harbors — by the allied troops. The po- sition of besieged was therefore a very strong and secure one ; that of the besiegers, on the contrary, bad. In spite of this inequality of conditions between the as- sailants and defenders, Toulon was taken. Far from me to dispute that it is meet to attribute a generous portion of this great success to the besieging army. It is my firm belief that the world has not seen soldiers whose soul quality was superior to that of those soldiers of the Re- public. The armies of the Empire even do not show us anything as grand. Undoubtedly the same bravery is common to them, and with them heroism is natural and a matter of course, but subservient to a less noble ideal. The love of glory, the passionate devotion to a great man, are not virtues of an equal moral value to this pure love of PREFACE Ixxxiii liberty and of Fatherland which fired the hearts of those soldiers of the Year II. In order to find something like unto them, we must go to ancient Greece and Rome for points of comparison. The soldier of the Revolution has nothing to envy the followers of Leonidas and Scipio. Greece in the presence of Xerxes, Rome in the presence of Hannibal do not appear greater or more stoic to me than our Republican France holding its own against the coalition. And I consider that the titles of nobility of our Fatherland would be lacking in something essential were that sublime page absent from its history. I admit also that great honor is due to the chief who commanded these admirable soldiers under the walls of Toulon. With his fifty-eight years,' his halo of blanched hair, Dugommier stands forth as an ancestor from among these thirty-year-old generals, glory's precocious flowers, which the Revolution expanded with its fiery rays. But his heart, his proud and generous heart, is unwrinkled ; and this old man is young, if 'tis true, as I believe, that the characteristic of youth is to be ready to shed every drop of its blood for an idea. His is a family of the no- blesse de robe of minor degree, but ancient. Love of the Revolution had taken possession of him, and he gave him- self up to it body and soul. A sincere and ardent sans- culotte he. But, while abjuring the ideas of his caste, he had retained a substratum of indelible nobility. He had been able to rid himself of aristocratic prejudices, but not of the inborn aristocracy of his instincts, being of those whose nobility courses in the very blood of their veins. 'Twas a hearty and rough war he waged against the enemies of the Republic, yet a humane and cour- teous one, too humane and too courteous even to suit the taste of the Committee of Public Safety and the rep- resentatives." The most modest, the most disinterested, ^Jacques Cocquille Dugommier was born in 1736 in the island of Guade- loupe, where his family, originally from the Nivernais, had been established for a century, ""^^.R Archives of the War Department ; Saliceti's letter to the Committee of Public Safety, 22d Frimaire, Year II. (i2th December, 1793). See also Ixxxiv MEMOIRS OF BARRAS as well as the bravest of men ; oblivious of himself in his reports,' in order to better bring to light the exploits of " brothers- in -arms," as he almost invariably styles his sol- diers. He revelled in battle, and rushed into it with the cheerfulness of a volunteer. " Get rid quickly of your blistering plasters," he writes to Doppet, lying ill at Perpi- gnan, " so that we may go and stick a few on the nape of the enemy's neck." ' What valor do we not discern in the somewhat coarse joviality of this soldier-like plain talking! An incomparable soldier, he was also endowed with the qualities of a commander, a quickness in seizing the main point, decisiveness, and energy. Saliceti found him " some- what slow in his measures." ' Bonaparte has avenged him of this censure.' But he knew not to kill when the fighting was over. The executions «'« 7/iasse ordered by the depu- ties after the capture of Toulon made him feel sick at heart." To shoot down a mob of disarmed men was not in his line. He got himself sent to the Army of the Pyre- the letter of Dugommier, 13th December, to the same Committee, wherein he defends himself from having treated "with too much politeness" the English general, O'Hara, taken prisoner. The army has heard " that our brothers-in- arms, prisoners (at Toulon), were being well treated ; we have been humane, I swear it to you, without ceasing to be Republicans." 'See Archives of the IVar Department ; Dugommier's letter to the Presi- dent of the Convention, 6th Nivose, Year II., announcing the despatch of a Memoir on the taking of Toulon : " We might have sent the flags which we found in great quantity in the evacuated posts ; but our brave brothers-in- arms value only those captured on the breach or wrested from the enemy. . . . I might likewise have given myself some personal ^clat by coming to announce a great event ; dtit Toulon had fallen, a result to zvhich I had contributed with all my main. That was enough for me / the glory of it belongs wholly to my brothers-in-arms." '- Iil^?npires du Gthieral Doppet, p. 248. ^ Letter from Saliceti to the Committee of Public Safety, 12th December, 1793. — Archives of the War Department. ■* " He was endowed with all the qualities of an old soldier. Personally a brave man, he loved brave men and was beloved by them. He was good- natured although hasty, active, fair-minded, possessed the military eye, sang- froid, and stubbornness." — Napoleon, quoted by M. lung, vol. ii., p. 389. ' It is ditficult to explain otherwise the request for a furlough, which he sends " by the first mail" to the Committee of Public Safety, six days only after the entry of the troops of the Convention into Toulon. — Archives of the War Department ; Dugommier's letter to the Committee of Pubhc Safety, 14th Nivose, Year II, (24th December, 1793). PREFACE Ixxxv nees, where a Spanish cannon-ball brought him the beau- tiful soldier -death for which Marshal de Villars envied Berwick. The Revolution produced greater captains. Hoche and Moreau, Kleber and Massena — not to mention the master of them all — were soldiers possessing greater capabilities. But I do not find in any of them, and no more in Bona- parte than in any other of these glorious chieftains, a moral purity to be compared with his." I admire them more ; but there is not one before whom I bow down with greater respect than before this rival of men like Bayard and Mont- calm, this chivalrous Jacobin, this fearless and blameless Republican. Alone, the suave and virginal face of the long-haired hussar, Marceau, might serve as a counterpart to that of old General Dugommier, the Rodriguez and Don Diego of the Revolution. It will therefore not be laid to my door that I am seek- ing to lessen the glory of the Army of Toulon and its general -in- chief. But the valor of these incomparable soldiers and the man to whom fell the well-deserved hon- or of commanding them would not have triumphed over the almost insurmountable difficulties of a siege under-. taken under the conditions I have mentioned, had not an ' I cannot deny myself the pleasure of recalling here an episode of the siege of Toulon which fully illustrates the temper of the soldiers and the com- mander of the Republican Army. The English general, O'Hara, made pris- oner in a sortie, had sent sixty lottis d'or for distribution among the soldiers of the Ardeche battalion, who instead of making short work of him — pursu- ant to the ferocious orders of the Convention — had raised him from the bat- tle-field, where he lay wounded, and had treated him with humanity. The four volunteers summoned to receive the reward decline it, saying, "They need, not gold, but bread and cartridges." Thereupon, Dugommier writes to O'Hara : "The money sent by you as a recognition of the service rendered by them to you on the loth Frimaire, was offered to the volunteers of the Re- public ; they declined it, with the same generosity which prompted yoit to ten- der it to them. I therefore return to you the sixty loiiis in gold which you had given to be distributed among my brothers-in-arms ; they are content with the pleasure they have felt in succoring a man in distress. It is thus, General, that our Republic erects itself on a foundation composed of every virtue, and it will some day put to shame the deceived nations who combat h."— Archives of the War Department ; Dugommier's letter to O'Hara, loth December, 1793. Ixxxvi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS idea, born of genius, presided over the conception of the plan of attack which was adopted, and the execution whereof resulted almost immediately in the surrender of Toulon. Here is that idea in all its luminous simplicity. The principal strength of Toulon lies in the formidable Anglo-Hispano-Neapolitan fleet, increased by the French squadron which treason has handed over to the enemy. To destroy this fleet, or simply to compel it to retreat, is to have Toulon at one's mercy. But, then, how is it to be attacked, since one does not possess a single ship to contend with it for the mastery of the sea ? By taking up a position whence the Republicans may render un- tenable the two harbors of which the allies are masters. But they are likewise masters of the heights commanding them ! It matters little. Moreover, it is not a question of recapturing all these heights from them. There is a point, a solitary point, Xh^ occupying of which is sufficient to place the hostile fleet in the alternative of flying or being burned. This point is the promontory of L'Eguil- lette, commanding both the large and the small harbor, and likewise the narrow channel by which ships pass from one into the other. But this promontory is impregnable ! It will be taken for all that. But its summit is occupied by Fort Mulgrave, the big English redoubt, bristling with batteries, which have won for it the significant appellation of "Little Gibraltar"! Other batteries shall be erected that shall silence their fire. It is there, and nowhere else, that it is necessary to strike in order to conquer. Let us at all costs take possession of the promontory of L'Eguil- lette, and Toulon is ours. Thus, to abandon absolutely the idea of taking Toulon by land, although apparently assailable on that side alone ; to replace the regular operations of a siege similar to all other sieges by a combination as novel as the conditions of this siege were unusual ; to substitute for direct action, of necessity slow, since it must have of necessity been exercised against a town always able to receive by way of the sea provisions, munitions of war, and reinforcements. PREFACE Ixxxvii an indirect action a thousand times more crushing in its effects; to take Toulon by the sea, although not possessing a fleet ; to secure possession of the solitary point from whicli it would be possible, luith batteries taking the place of ships, to engage the enemy in a real naval combat in which it would inevitably be destroyed if it ventured to face so disproportionate a struggle, or compelled to fly in all haste if it preferred to fly from a most terrible danger — such was, stripped of its accessories, the inspiring idea which restored Toulon to the Republic. It remains to be seen with whose brain this plan origi- nated. M. lung does not even take the trouble of solving the problem.' As for MM. Krebs and Moris, 'tis a kind of anonymous and collective work, everybody in the army having from the very first days of the siege grasped that Toulon could not be taken in any other way." As to Barras, we have seen that if he does not attribute to him- self expressly the recapture of Toulon as he does the vic- tory of the 13th Vend^miaire, he at least accords to Du- gommier alone the honor of this great success.' Let us therefore examine anew, not works on the siege of Toulon written at second hand, but authentic and offi- cial documents contemporaneous with the event. Let us ask the Archives of the War Department to reveal to us the * " We do not propose to embark upon a detailed narrative of this operation of war, which is well known." — Bonaparte et son temps, vol. ii., p. 391. ' See Canipagnes dans les Alpes, p. 373, note 3, already quoted. ° " The taking prisoner of General O'Hara, attributed to Bonaparte, the English ship he is alleged to have sunk, the plan of campaign in wliich he is alleged to have had a share, are so many mendacious assertions. ... I repeat, 'tis Dugommier who is the actual captor al 1 ovAoii." (Memoirs of Barras, chap, xvi.) Barras is right in regard to the making prisoner of General O'Hara, a deed Napoleon attributed wrongfully to himself later on, and one which time-serving writers have continued attributing to him on the strength of this assertion. O'Hara was made prisoner by four obscure volunteers of the ArdJche battalion, commanded by Suchet. — See Archives of the War De- partment, military correspondence, Army of Toulon, loth December, 1793, a communication made in 1832 to Lieutenant-General Count Pelet, Director of the Ordnance Office, by M. Leone d'Almeyda, a former aide-de-camp of Dugommier before Toulon. Ixxxviii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS genesis of this plan whose author is, it would seem, every- body but Bonaparte. They inform us that the first idea of both generals and deputies was to take Toulon by main force by a vigorous attack directed against its defences on the land side. Car- teaux speaks of " carrying all the forts and redoubts with cold steel." On this point he is for once in accord with his colleague Lapoype. No more than the general-in-chief do the deputies at that date of the lOth of September dream of reducing Toulon by the sea. They propose to cut off the town's water supply, to direct a double attack against its land defences ; meanwhile the fleet is to be bombarded so as to prevent its fire protecting the assailed works." Nothing in all this resembles, even remotely, the plan adopted and carried out some weeks later. Suddenly an absolutely new idea makes its appearance, and breaks out in the correspondence of the deputies: " Far from us to lay a regular siege to the town of Toulon, ■wlien ive possess a surer means of reducing it, and this means consists in either destroying the hostile squadron by fire, or in compelling it to retreat in fear thereof. . . . We are merely waiting for our heavy artillery to occupy a position whence we can reach the ships with red-hot ball, and we shall then see -wliether we do not become masters of Toulon. ..." These lines are dated the 13th of September, 1793. How great a progress have not the representatives of the people made in three days ! We are far from the plan of taking Toulon by thirst! How the idea of "a regular siege," nay, even the idea of direct attacks from the land side, is abruptly and contemptuously abandoned ! Now, on the 29th of the same month, these same representatives recommend for promotion to the rank of major that Cap- tain Bonaparte, in command since the 7th of the artillery ; and on the 30th they write that the young officer is " the only artillery captain capable of conceiving operations." I ' Archives of the War Department. — Letters from Carteaux and Lapoype to the Minister Bouchotte, loth and nth September, 1793 ; letter of the repre- sentatives to the Committee of Public Safety, loth September. PREFACE Ixxxix conclude from these lines already quoted, the full value of which it was impossible to gauge previously, that this new idea, springing up suddenly in the correspondence of the representatives, leaves no doubt as to the title Bonaparte has just acquired to their good-will. What is this title, if it is not the indication of a way of taking Toulon, of which neither they nor any one else had thought of in the iirst instance? Whether it was, as I believe, inspired by Bonaparte, or whether the honor of it belongs entirely to the men alone who have affixed their signatures to it — Gasparin, Saliceti, and Albitte — the letter of 13th September gives us, it must be admitted, nothing more than the rough sketch, the out- lines of the plan which has just been set forth. An essen- tial feature is lacking — to wit, the precise indication of the point where the Republican Army is to establish itself in order to compel the hostile fleet to evacuate the harbor. However legitimate may be the hypothesis which I have just emitted, it does not constitute a proof. Let us there- fore push our investigation further. Here are precisely two plans of attack on Toulon sub- mitted to the Minister of War or to the Committee of Public Safety. The first has for its author Doumet- Revest, a naval engineer.' The idea of occupying posi- tions commanding the harbor is certainly set forth therein. But this is merely an accessory undertaking. Doumet- Revest has nowise foreseen the consequences of such occu- pation. He does not point out the particular position the securing of which is, of itself alone, to have decisive effects, that solitary point whose possession must neces- sarily bring about the downfall of Toulon. 'Tis always, in this excellent but short-sighted plan, on the land side that the Republicans are to bring all their strength to bear. ' " Plan of attack on the infamous town of Toulon on all points at which it is susceptible of defence, by citizen Doumet-Revest, naval engineer, resid- ing at Grenoble." — Archives of the Technical Section of Military Engineer- ing, War Department. Siege of Toulon in 1793; document addressed to the Minister Bouchotte, 14th November, 1793. xc MEMOIRS OF BARRAS The second plan, dating from the last days in October, is signed with the illustrious name of Michaud d'Argon,' General of Engineers and Inspector of Fortifications — the greatest authority of the day, and the most justly held in esteem in the matter of sieges or the defence of fortified places. The Archives of the War Department possess no less than three Notes or Memoirs devoted to the "Toulon undertaking," from the 26th to the 31st of October, 1793, from the pen of the great engineer whom the king's army bequeathed — together with so many other excellent officers — to the armies of the Revolution. These several projects constitute a veritable plan of attack, most carefully studied and drawn up, completed by an ex- planatory map.'' This plan provides for a blockade by land, with "at least 150,000 men." Now Dugommier himself confesses to only 20,000 available men in the two corps of the Conventional army, a few days previous to the great attack of the 17th of December!'' 'Tis true that Michaud d'Argon enjoins the occupation of all head- lands, of all heights commanding the harbor. But he has no m.ore than Doumet-Revest suspected the singular importance of one of these positions, he has not seen that the occupation of this sole point would dispense the be- sieging force from occupying all the others.'' In his eyes, as in the eyes of Doumet-Revest, the siege of Toulon is a classical operation. Herissons, chevanx-de-frise, trenches, approaches, parallels, covert ways on the western front of the town, in order to be able to batter in breach its ramparts, the erection of an " immense battery of at least one hundred guns " — not one of the prescriptions of the time-honored ^Archives of the War Department ; Notes and Memoirs of Michaud d'Ar^on on the operations against Toulon, 26th, 27th, and 31st October, 1793, See, in regard to Michaud d'Ar<;on, the fine work of Arthur Chuquet, La Trahisonde Ditmouriez, pp. 32 and 33, note i. "^ Archives of the War Department ; historical atlas, closet F, drawer 3. ^ See Archives of the War Department ; Dugommier's letter to Bouchotte, lOth December. •■ He even seems to be ignorant of the fact that the promontory of L'Eguillette is occupied, and strongly occupied at that, by the English. PREFACE XCl art of besieging towns is omitted. This plan embodies two great defects: in the first place, it is in no way adapt- ed to the particular and very special conditions of the besieged town ; in the second, it presupposes means of action which were never at the besieging force's disposal. With these two plans stands, connected by an evident kinship of inspiration and method, the plan whose princi- pal features we find scattered through the Orders of the Day and the Narrative of the Capture of Toulon by the Major of Engineers, Marescot.' This one also belongs to the traditional classical school. A vast line of investment, with circumvallation ; trenches niyriamhres in length ; galleries, approaches, parallels; in fact, much shovelling of earth. The genuine plan of a good engineer officer, of a " digger," who conscientiously puts into practice on the ground the lessons he has learned in books. The whole slow, circumspect, and methodical — the interminable labor of a mole burrowing its way. Yet these are the plans invoked by MM. Krebs and Moris in support'' of their astounding proposition. "In regard to determining the plan of attack, little credit would have been due to Bonaparte for discovering what was patent to all !" Who is there who cannot see that if Toulon had been besieged according to the ideas of the authors of these plans, the siege of Toulon would have lasted as long as that of Troy ? Fortunately, Bonaparte interfered. After these long and roundabout preliminaries, rendered necessary by a desire of throwing the fullest light on the truth, I finally come to this early, this clear manifestation of the genius of war revealed by the siege of Toulon, both to the extraor- dinary man who so far bore it unknown to himself, and to those who, witnesses of his striking beginnings, doubt- ' Marescot's Orders of the Day. An account of the attacks on Toulon, or Port de la Montagne, by Major Marescot, commanding the Engineers, 20th Nivose, Year II. (gth January, nqi).— Archives of the IVar Department. ' Those of Doumet-Revest and of Michaud d'Ar9on, at any rate. MM. Krebs and Moris do not seem to have become cognizant of the ideas of Mares- cot as to the way of attacking Toulon, xcii MEMOIRS OF BARRAS less had a presentiment of the high destinies they herald- ed. Were it necessary to apologize for a fondness for ac- curacy, which is the probity of history, I would say that it is precisely what justifies the care I am bestowing on es- tablishing with minute precision the role of Bonaparte at the siege of Toulon. It is a matter just as worthy of inter- est, and just as philosophical, to wish to know how a great man began as it is to seek how he ended. Now, the le- gend does not lie ; nay, it is even more veracious than cer- tain histories, when it asserts that Napoleon " began " with this memorable siege. On the very day that the engineer Doumet-Revest was sending from Chambery to the Minister of War his " Plan of attack on the infamous town of Toulon," viz., on the 14th of November, 1793, another plan, signed Bonaparte, left the headquarters at Ollioules, addressed to the same Bouchotte.' The young artillery commandant wrote : " Citizen Minister, the plan of attack I have laid before the generals and the representatives of the people is, I be- lieve, the only practicable one. Had it been followed from the outset with a little more ardor, it is probable that we should now be in Toulon. . . . To drive the enemy out of the harbor is the preliminary point to a regular siege, and per- haps this operation even will give us Toulon!' ... In order to become masters of the harbor, it is necessary to secure possession of the promontory of L Eguillette. . . . More than a month ago did I tell" the generals that the artillery we have at present was powerful enough to silence the fire of tlie English redoubt situated on the summit of the promontory of L'Eguillette. . . ." Then follows an enumeration of the batteries he has ' Archives of the Technical Section of the Engineer Department at the Ministry of War. Plans of attack on Toulon sent to the Minister by Bona- parte, 24th Brumaire, Year II., published in the Correspondance de NapoUon. 14th November. 1793, No, 4, ' This is indeed what happened a month later. " Attention is called to the fact that this assertion of Bonaparte confirms the hypothesis emitted by me, in regard to the first appearance, in the letter written on the 12th of September by the representatives of the people, of the idea of an indirect attack, by the sea, on Toulon. PREFACE xciii erected to pave the way for the execution of the essential portion of his plan ; the occupation of the promontory of L'Eguillette; the carrying of the terrible English fort or redoubt Mulgrave. Not his the fault if this position is in the hands of the English. " When the representatives of the people placed me in command of the artillery ... ev- erything made me see the necessity for creating an equip- ment which would enable us to drive the enemy out of the harbors by erecting a battery at L'Eguillette. . . . Three days after my arrival the batteries of La Montagne and the sans-ctilottcs were erected, sunk the hulks, and with- stood over twenty thousand cannon-balls. Thereupon the enemy, realizing the insufficiency of their naval artillery, braved all hazards and landed troops at L'Eguillette. They ought to have been crushed during this operation ; fate or folly allowed it to succeed} ... I then grasped that the taking of Toulon had been missed. . . ." Postponed, rather. For, without losing a minute, he has gone to work, in order to repair the blunder due to the incapacity of Carteaux. With feverish and lucid ac- tivity he accumulates means of attack, and masses togeth- er the requisite strength. Indifferent to the contradictory orders clashing about him, and to the cltass^-croisd of the generals-in-chief, who come, pass, and disappear, he toils day and night over his task, his tenacious mind never de- viating for a single moment from the object he has in view — to wit, the taking of Little Gibraltar. He advances his batteries to the very base of the big English redoubt ; he has enveloped it, surrounded it with his mortars and cannon, which await but a signal — he cannot, unfortunate- ly, give it himself ! — to belch forth destruction and death on Fort Mulgrave. He will take this formidable position, not by a regular and methodical siege, but with a bound something like that of a beast of prey suddenly springing ' The testimony of Bonaparte is here fully confirmed by that of Saliceti, who accuses Carteaux of having allowed the English to secure possession of the heights whence one might have " thundered destruction on the squadron." —Archives of the War Department, letter from Saliceti, 25th September, 1793- xciv MEMOIRS OF BARRAS at its victim's throat ; at the appointed moment he will let loose his batteries, just as one unleashes dogs. The siege-artillery itself, the slow, heavy, immutable batteries of position, are called upon, pursuant to a prodigiously daring conception, to join in the impetuous sally which is, at one bound, to carry the Republican Army to the sum- mit of the murderous slope. " With these eight batteries L'Eguillette shall be ours ; it cannot resist on the infantry coming vigorously forward, when once the fire of the ene- my's guns shall have been silenced by the bombs and can- non.'" Let but a general appear, sufficiently intelligent to understand his plan and adopt it, and with enough en- ergy to execute it with the fury required for the supreme attack. Fort Mulgrave is taken, the promontory of L'Eguil- lette torn from English grasp, the harbor evacuated, and Toulon capitulates. Bonaparte awaits Dugommier. Compare this plan with those already analyzed. Meas- ure the respective originality, the vigor, and daring of the minds which conceived them. There, all the old formulas of the art of laying siege. Here, a contempt for ordinary rules, because a truer and more penetrating insight has revealed that they are not suitable to the present case, an exceptional one ; the application to a siege under unusual conditions of a method whose merit is precisely to be ab- normal ; the hand placed with supreme clairvoyance from the very first day on the point on which blows are to be dealt, to crush the enemy at one stroke ; a daring concep- tion, served by still more daring means of execution — - means simple and as destructive as thunder ; a plan, in short, which a month before the capture of Toulon gives us point by point the programme of the memorable and decisive operations accomplished by the right wing of the army from the i6th to the i8th of December: the over- whelming of Fort Mulgrave by the batteries encompassing it, the impetuous storming of the big English redoubt, the occupation of the promontory of L'Eguillette, the precipi- tate retreat of the hostile fleet, the surrender of the rebel ' This is precisely what happened on the 17th of December. PREFACE xcv city — everything that Bonaparte had foreseen and an- nounced in that " Plan of attack," wherein shines forth al- ready the genius which seems to subject to its imperious yoke — even to the deceptive mobility of coming events. Now, if that genius is not the author of this marvellous plan, if it is anybody but Bonaparte — if it be Dugommier, as Barras claims — who took Toulon, then you may as well tell me that it was not the Emperor who won at Austerlitz and at Jena. Moreover, the heroic and honest soldier to whom Barras attributes the taking of Toulon, Dugommier, has himself rendered unto Bonaparte what is due to him. At the time of the Council of War held on the 25th of November, nine days after his arrival, the new general-in-chief declared "that he did not think he could submit a more luminous and more feasible plan than the one submitted by the major commanding the Artillery ; that, having followed the ideas of that plan, he had in turn hurriedly drawn one up, and this plan, which it was a pleasure to him to give its primary author credit for, he laid before the Council." ' How would Dugommier, who had, so to speak, arrived the day before to take command of the Army of Toulon, have had the time to mature and draw up a plan? 'Tis honor enough for him to have understood from the outset the merit of another's idea, and, after having adopted it without hesitancy, to have carried it out with incompar- able vigor. It is sufficient to cast a glance on this plan of Dugommier's° to convince one's self that the plan of the ' Vie de Dugommier, written in 1799 by A. Rousselin de Saint-Albin, as yet unpublished, save for a fragment — relating precisely to the siege of Toulon — published by the author's son among the Docmnents Telatifs ci la Revobition franfaise, taken from the unpublished works of A. Rousselin de Saint-Albin, Paris, Dentu, 1873, I vol. 8vo. The passage quoted by me is taken from the manuscript of M. de Saint-Albin ; its text has not in every in- stance been reproduced faithfully in the publication above mentioned. This Vie de Dugommier, drawn up from a large number of authentic documents col- lected for the purpose by M. de Saint-Albin, when, in 179S, Secretary-General to Bernadotte at the Ministry of War, is of real historic interest. ^ Observations on the siege of Toulon, an eight -page manuscript, signed Dugommier, undated, but assuredly posterior to the Council of War of the xcvi MEMOIRS OF BARRAS general-in-chief is naught else, according to his own ad- mission, than a counterdrawing of that of Bonaparte. Not only is the march of operations identical in both, not only does Dugommier set unto himself, as his primary and principal objective, the occupation of the promontory of L'Eguillette and the expulsion of the enemy's fleet; but certain phrases of his are of so strangely a Napoleonic turn, that it may be asked if Bonaparte did not perad- venture himself indite them for his chief. "The success of any enterprise whatsoever depends on an exact calcula- tion of the means employed towards it, of iJicir rigid pro- portions, and of their respective bearings." This is a formu- la born in the brain of a mathematician. " The ships are the maritime ramparts of the town of Toulon. If we com- pel them to sail away, the town loses its principal support." Are not this striking idea and close bit of reasoning one of the characteristics of Napoleon's " mode of expres- sion " ? " The attitude of the enemy after the event, that of our army, lastly, the circumstances which are ever to be taken into account in war, will govern our ulterior line of action!' He who has, even in the slightest degree, made a study of the Napoleonic bent of mind, will admit that this sentence bears unmistakably the mark of the circum- spect soldier whose strategy was ever as supple as his pol- icy, alas ! showed itself inflexible. Marescot makes an important remark in his account of the attacks on Toulon. At the Council of War of the 25th of November, "the general-in-chief read a plan of attack, which was followed by another prescribed by the Committee of Public Safety. These two plans differed but little from each other!' How could they have differed, since their origin was a common one — viz., the plan of Bonaparte, sent to the Minister of War in Paris, approved of by the Committee,' and evidently communicated by 25th of November. To this document is attached a plan of attack. — Archives of the War Department ; military correspondence, Army of Toulon, Decem- ber, 1793. ^ " A memorandum of a member of the Committee of Public Safety of the day informs us . . . that the Committee of Public Safety . . . was so pleased H ^ tx of O S-W ^ X s in o c [i. P < o J5 ^ ;z: \ - ^\ t -* ' Lv«