VH /2 CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE wsmnKwss^iii^mf^ Date Due PRINTED IN &S NO. 2323S nil »»»-*^i'?" ""'vefsity Library PN 6299.E65 1877 iftPi9iPi!ll'.t?.^9P^^ °' Erasmus. 3 1924 027 287 014 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924027287014 The Apophthegmes of Erafmus. 2SP copies only printed. £,R.«K.OX^ of €ta0mus %xanUtth into 6ngltft ftp ..if LITERALLY REPRINTED FROM THE SCARCE EDITION OF 1564. EDITED AND ILLUSTRATED WITH NOTES AND PARALLEL PASSAGES, BY ROBERT ROBERTS. BOSTON, LINCOLNSHIRE: Printed by Robert Roberts, Strait Bar-Gate. MDCCCLXXyil. fNl h ^ U^^ ti. ^s ■ EU5 mi ^ \8n A. \ 03 53H- Contents PORTRAIT (to face TITLE) , PREFACE . ■ « • MEMOIR . . . . . . . ^ FACSIMILE OF TITLE TO FIRST ENGLISH EDITION, 1 542 FACSIMILE OF THE FIRST LEAF OF N. UDALL'S PREFACE, FROM THE 1542 EDITION N. UDALL'S ADDRESS TO THE READER PREFACE OF ERASMUS ..... PREAMBLE OF THE INTERPRETER VNTO THE SAIYNGES OF SOCRATES BOOK L SOCRATES ARISTIPPVS DIOGENES, THE CYNIKE BOOK II. PHILIPPVS, KYNG OF MACEDONIE ALEXANDER, THE CREATE ANTIGONVS, THE FIRSTE KYNG OF THE AVGVSTVS CAESAR IVLIVS CAESAR . POMPEIVS, THE CREATE PHOCION MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO DEMOSTHENES, THE ORATOUR THE TABLE . APPENDIX 111 ix I • 45 . 76 . 181 . 204 MACEDONIANS 236 • 253 • 293 • 3" • 323 • 336 • 369 • 385 • 409 /\. \ 0'2)^^^ vu i^ W^^ ■vS-^" jr^ ■-=S Sl^l^^a rc-:^.^^; Preface. HIS is a pleasant, gossipy book, — full of wise saws» if not of modern instances. It may be con- sidered one of the earliest English jest books. The wit in it is not as startling as fireworks, but there is a good deal of grave, pleasant humour, and many of those touches of nature which make the whole world kin. It is very interesting to have not only the great thoughts of great men, but to see these men in their moments of leisure, when they unbend and come down to the level of ordinary mortals. Weak stomachs cannot bear too much of a good thing, and nothing is so tiresome as the everlasting preach- ing of very good and very wise people. We find that even in the palmy days of Greece the greatest orators had occa- sionally to recall the attention of their wearied: hearers by some witty and humourous tale, such as the " Sha>dow of the Ass," (p. 84). Erasmus, complains of this- same kiat- tentiveness in his Praise of Folly ^ and says, the preacher on such occasions would tell them a tale oat of Gesta, Raman- onum, when they would " lyft vp theyr heads, stand vp, and geue good eare." Plenty of instances may be found here to prove a universal truth, that really great men are gene- rally fond of a joke. It was sound advice, depend upon it, which the philosopher gave to the young man — " Be not anything over muck" The familiar life of the ancients is viii - PREFACE. also brought pleasantly before us, reminding us of the well- .known saying that " there is a deal of human nature in a man." Was it good nature in the Greeks that made them so pa- tient under the coarse reproofs of Diogenes .' If so, one cannot help wondering that, while they were so tolerant of him, they put Socrates to death, who was in all things so much wiser and better. Was it not that Diogenes was a crafty man, who was shrewd enough 'to see that it does not do to prove one's superiority too strongly? So, like our mediaeval jesters, he mingled a little wit with a good deal of folly. He was fully aware of the great truth lately uttered by a bucolic friend here : — " To git on i' th' world, a man wants to appear like a fool, we'out bein' one. Men's des- p'rately afread ov a clever fella' — they doant feel safe we 'im. Nice, soft-lookin' chaps alus git on best." So Dio- genes made himself purposely dirty and contemptible. His coarse buffoonery was the traditional " tub " thrown to the whale (by-the-by, do they really throw tubs to whales ?) to amuse it while the harpoon which was to pierce through its blubber was being prepared. And the Greek public, so fond of seeing and hearing new things, was amused ac- cordingly, — and pierced in due course ; and very barbed some of the harpoons were. Socrates scorned to stoop to this, , and consequently had to pay the price usually paid by those whose virtue is a reproach to their neighbours. This reprint is made from the second edition, — that of 1562. The two have been read very carefully together, and no difference discovered between them, except in the spelling. A facsimile of the first leaf of the 1542 edi- tion is given, which will show how much this varies. The second was chosen principally because it is very much PREFACE. ix the rarer book. The reprint is literal ; the only differ- ence being that, to make it easier for the general reader, the contractions have been filled in, and the Greek quota- tions, which were exceedingly incoirect, have been, in most cases, put right. The Rev. E. Johnson, M.A., kindly con- sented to write a short sketch of the life of Erasmus, and an Appendix of Notes and Illustrations has been added. The list of curious and unusual words might have been in- creased ten-fold ; but, as in most cases a careful reading of the context will show sufficiently well their meaning, it was not necessary to make it larger. When Nicolas Udall undertook to translate this work he was the right man in the right place. Probably no old Eng- lish book so abounds with colloquialisms and idiomatic ex- pressions. It is very valuable on that account. It has always been a favourite with the editor, and seeing that a fair copy of the original fetches £$ or £6 by auction, he thought 250 readers might be found who would be glad to have a reprint of it. The production of these antiquarian works in short numbers is necessarily very expensive, and after " trade allowances " and other deductions have been made, it is impossible in this instance there should be any profit ; but it has been a labour of love, and the editor will be quite satisfied if he has succeeded in giving the slightest help to a wider knowledge of so fine and loveable a char- acter as Erasmus. R. R. Boston, July 3, 1877. II Desiderius Erasmus Rotero- damus. IN the great market-place of the Dutch port whence Birth and Erasmus derived his surname, there stands a bronze statue of the great scholar ; and in the Breede Kerkstraat the house is pointed out in which he was born, bearing the inscription, Haec est farva domus, magnus qua natus Erasmus. With the excep- tion of the fact of his place of birth and parentage, however, there is little that connects him with Hol- land ; nothing in his character or history to remind us Not much to remind us that that he was a Dutchman. There was no flavour of he was a peculiar nationality in his genius ; his greatness is the Dutchman, common boast of lettered Europe. His name is linked by important associations with France, with England, with Italy, and with Germany. Our own country in particular, to which he owed the greatest benefits and sweetest friendships of his life, may claim the largest share in his reflected renown. But in truth he was a ' No fixed home, man without a home, in any fixed local sense ; his ^^yT to ^e outward history is the record of a series of wanderings ioxinA in the to and fro, and changeful sojourns in various cities, of wit and and with various friends and patrons ; but in the best •«*"»'"?• society, that of men of learning and wit, he was always to be found ; anywhere, within the free territory of the glorious Republic of Letters, he felt himself to be at home. He may well have made the motto his b own : 12 MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. Ubi lene, ilii patria. May be styled the Ulysses of Letters. Was a liberal man in illib- eral times. Misconcep. tions of his character. His writings shook the ancient sys- tem of religion. own : Vii bene, ibi patria. Calling to mind his many travels and toils, together with the patient unconquer- able temper which sustained him under them, — ^his penetrating insight into human nature, joined to his powerful rhetorical gift, we might discern something of a resemblance to the most intellectual of Ho- meric heroes, and term Erasmus the Ulysses of Letters. Had his mind been naturally prone to- wards contracted views of religion and philosophy, his opportunities of intercourse with many of the best minds of Europe would have had a counter- active influence ; but in fact his genius was naturally sympathetic, expansive, and catholic. His eminence in this quality of character was the more conspicuous, considering the harsh and narrowing tendency of the religious controversies of his time, which few minds in Europe were found great enough to resist. It is open to question whether the character and spirit of Erasmus, with reference to his services in the cause of learning and of religion, and more especially with reference to his attitude towards the contending parties at the Reformation, has been fairly understood. His memory, like the reflection of a star in troubled water, has come down to us somewhat confused by the great conflict of that epoch. There exists, prob- ably, a general impression that he was a trimmer, possibly that he was a coward. It is knovm that he shook the ancient system of religion by means of his widely-circulated writings ; and it has been gene- rally believed, from the time of his contemporaries downwards, that his keen satire contributed as power- fully towards bringing about the Reformation as the fearless denunciations and open attacks of Luther. But MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. * 13 But it is remembered that he never threw himself But he died in into the ranks of the Lutheran party, notwithstanding nion of'Jhe" the eager sohcitations of Luther himself, and his fol- Church of Rome. lowers ; that in the end he broke with the Reformers, and died as he had lived, in the communion of the Church of Rome. On the other hand, the Papal party were equally anxious to secure his literary services for the defence of the Church : and he so far yielded as to write a treatise He wrote a ■^ . treatise on on Free Will in opposition to the Reformers' doctrme Free Will. of Divine grace. But like a dart flung from a lax and unwarlike hand, it failed to strike home : — " telumque imbelle sine ictu Conjecit rauco quod proHnus aere repulsum, Et summo clipei nequidquam umbone pependit ; " while the author awaited in trepidation the unsheathing of Luther's terrible controversial sword, and after re- ceiving the return thrust in the Reformer's work De Servo Arbitrio, he retired once for all from the ranks of conflict. The result was that Erasmus enjoyed the hearty He pleased confldence of neither party, and was regarded with ""''^'■^ P^^'y- considerable disfavour by both. The more ardent of the Reformers loaded him with moral reproaches ; and Rome has placed some of his works in the Index Expurgatorius. And thus it has come to pass, that the mental image of the great scholar appears double or blurred in the popular conception of him, but not, we believe, altogether justly so, if an accurate estimate be taken pf his character, and in relation to the epoch in which his lot was cast. To live in times when men's ^^ "^? v"^"*^" tunatem living fierce and wrathful passions are stirred to their ex- in troubled ^ times, tremest 14 MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. Luther was a spirit formed to live in stormy times. Erasmus' greatness was for all time. tremest pitch is not a fortune to be envied. Yet there are spirits who thrive congenially in such times, and are thrown up into eminence by them : of such was Luther. But to those of a delicate, sensitively humane, or passionately peace-loving temper, such by way of parallel, as Lord Falkland, in the time of our own great civil struggle, the air of strife is baneful ; and their reputation is likely to suffer, in proportion as they keep themselves free from the bigotry of par- tisanship. Their sigh of "Peace, peace!" is sweet- ness wasted on the desert air.* To state the truth in other words : there are two classes of great men : those whose greatness is related to their generation, those whose greatness is for all time ; those whose work has a particular, and those whose work has an universal significance. So far as this division is valid, Luther ranks amongst the former, Erasmus amongst the latter. The controversialist has his day : the true scholar is immortal. It will be the design of the present brief sketch to bring the figure of Erasmus afresh into the light, to attempt some loving and not less just estimate of his spirit, and to offer some genuine, though slight, tribute to his services in the cause of civilization in Europe. Erasmus was pre-eminently a man 6f Let^rs. IL Erasmus was specifically, characteristically, and by eminence, a Man of Letters. And in so describing him, we separate him, and nobly distinguish him from the mere ecclesiastic, or the theologian. He was in early life a monk : he subsequently assumed the in- delible orders of the priesthood ; but who that is con- versant * Erasmus wrote The Complaint of Peace in early life, at Paris. It is significant of his constitutional temper. MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. * IS versant with his genial writings ever pictures him as Erasmus was monk or priest ? As the conception of humanity dis- ^^^^ " * solves all national and sectarian distinctions, so the conception of Letters dissolves all partialities of human thought and doctrine. For what do " Letters " stand for but the record of the catholic experience of human mind, in its inter- course with self, with nature, with man, with the in- finite and the unseen ? The glory of literature — as The glory of contrasted with the lesser glories of Science, Philosophy, he/ humanity. Theology — is her humanity. She counts nothing that is of man foreign to herself. To speak historically, the Land that we call Hellas or Greece, is th^ mother of Letters, as Palestine is the mother of Religion, to us Europeans. Erasmus, and generally all the line of lettered men a votary of since the Revival of Learning, loved to invoke the Muses, and to profess themselves votaries and disciples of the Muses. These phVases, through loijg use, have become in our day somewhat out-worn ; yet let us not forget the eternal truth and beauty which the glorious myth of the Muses enfolds. The birth of those nine sacred sisters, daughters of Zeus and Memory, instructs us that Art, and Religion, and Philosophy, and Science, and History, — all that is fair and great in human life — ^proceeds from the intercourse of mind with the Infinite, of man with God. Their choral dance around the fount of Helicon typifies the eternal har- mony of Religion with Knowledge, Passion with Rea- son, which the bigotry of partial creeds is ever seeking to disturb. When we read, in Hesiod's noble hymn in their praise, of the untiring sweet sound which flows forth from their mouths, and the halls of Father Zeus the the Muses. i6 MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. Mount Olym- pus. Erasmus was a friend and favourite of the Muses. the mighty Thunderer smiling at the delicate diffusive voice of the goddesses, with echoes from the snowy crests of Olympus, and halls of the immortals — ^we are reminded of the all-pervading charm of truth, beauty, apd love, in heaven and earth. And when mother Memory is described as bringing forth in the persons of her daughters, XtjO'iioirvvyp/ re KaKutv a/iirau/ia re fiepfiripaw, " of ills oblivion, rest from cares," we reflect how much of enduring solace we have found in books of treasured wit and wisdom in many hours of loneUness and sorrow. Erasmus, we repeat, was by natural bent and genius, a Man of Letters, in the noblest sense, — a friend and favourite of the Muses. His great ser- vices as a revi- ver of Learn- ing. III. The interest which attaches to his memory is due, in the larger measure, to his relation to the literary history of Europe, to his prominent services as a herald of the re-advent of Learning to the world. Following the favourite metaphor of historians and poets, which represents the resuscitation of knowledge and enquiry as the rising of a great light after ages of darkness, his figure, we may say, is suffused by the rosy dawn : he is like an angel standing in the sun. In order to esiamate his services to literature, let us take a rapid glance at the intellectual movements which preceded him. It is difficult to picture to ourselves with sufficient strength of impression the blank and dreary condition of the general mind of Europe during more than five hundred MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. * l^ hundred years from the dissolution of the Roman em- Dreary condi- pire. It reminds one of a vast stretch of black fen, or ^ftertoe disso- of the boundless Russian steppe. Here and there a lution of the ,. . . , ,,..,., Roman Em- solitary specimen of culture, a scholastic prince like pire. Charlemagne, Alfred, or St. Louis, an athletic thinker like Erigena, arises, to break the depressing monotony, but " For leagues no other tiee doth mark The level -waste, the rounding grey." The track of the Saracens in the South was marked by The School- a bright belt of culture, but its seeds were not widely ™™ derived ° ' ■' their learning diffused for the general enrichment of Europe. The from the Schoolmen, who inherited their knowledge, such as it ^^■'^™'' was, of Aristotle through the Arab Averroes, were otherwise all ignorant of literature, and rendered no services whatever to general enlightenment. The splendid intellectual energies of Erigena, Roscellinus, Anselm, Abelard, Peter Lombard ; of Albertus Mag- nus, Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus, and others were kept in thraldom to the Church system. Thinkers could only enjoy their mental faculties on a much harsher tenure than the feudal ever was in political re- lations. The spirit of inquiry, rudely thrust back, on threat of the last ecclesiastical penalties, from all fields of genuine human and spiritual interest, was cramped within a narrow arena, and forced to exhaust , , , , . itself in laborious idleness. The Schoolmen were tellectual ath- simply a band of intellectual athletes, and their achiev- hibit'edTgym^' ments were simply a series of gymnastic feats. " After nastic feats, but solved three or four hundred years, they had not untied a nothing. single knot, nor added one uneqivocal truth to the domain of philosophy" (Hallam). It is important to note that one of Erasmus's characteristics is his re- presentative MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. Erasmus led a reactionary movement agEiinst the Schoolmen. Light has ever come from the East. Constantinople had been the library of the world. presentative character, as leading a reactionary move- ment against the hybrid metaphysical theology of these his intellectual predecessors. We shall have occasion to recur to this subject presently, when speaking of his theological position. But hope for the culture of Europe was beginning to arise from another quarter. Light has ever come from the East, for the spiritual as well as for physical nature. And this spiritual phenonemon was once more to be repeated in history. Roughly speaking, we may date from the middle of the fourteenth century (a.d. 1350) the flow of Letters westward. Constantinople had been for several centuries the library of the world. There the Greek tongue, that " golden key," in the sonorous periods of Gibbon, " that could unlock the treasures of antiquity, a musical and prolific language that gives a soul to the objects of sense, and a body to the abstractions of philosophy," lived on as an oral speech. Yet learning, amidst the effete life of a de- cayed civilization remained in a state of congestion and uselessness. But the time was come when the wealth of ancient knowledge " No more should rest in mounded heaps But smit ivith freer light should sloivly melt In many streams to fatten lonver lands." A steady flow The intercourse between the churches of the East and scholars from ^^ West at the time of the council of Florence occa- Constantinople sioned a Steady drift of Greek scholars from Constan- tinople to Italy, beginning with Barlaam, and Leontius Pilatus, the friends and tutors of Petrarch and Boccac- cio, continued in Chrysoloras, Theodore of Gaza, George of Trebizond, John Arguropylos, and ending with Demetrius Chalcocondyles. Among MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. * IQ Among the pupils of the latter were our own coun- Grocyn, Lin- trymen, Grocyn, Linacre, and Latimer j and in their Ladnu;" persons an interesting link is found between the move- ment of Greek learning in Italy and its communication to our own country. Erasmus, joining the English scholars at Oxford, received instruction in Greek from ^'^^,^."\"?, , ' studied Greek them, and proved an earnest ally in the effort to plant at Oxford. Greek learning in the universities. They had, as is well known, to encounter a senseless outburst of literary Toryism which has always had deep root in the old universities, in the party of the " Trojans." From an early age it appears that Erasmus was His great . , _ . esteem for conscious of the surpassmg value of the Grecian Grecian classics, and was seized with an enthusiasm for the •''«■^'""• study. He felt that the revival of letters meant above all the revival of living Greece to breathe her spirit of power and beauty again over the withered intellect of Europe. In Paris, he utters a passionate wish for money, that he might buy books first and clothes afterwards. To know the great Roman poets and philosophers, whose more familiar language the Church had preserved in her services, was not enough. He must ascend the stream, and drink of the fount. " The Latins, he said, " had only narrow rivulets, the Greeks pure and copious rivers; and their streams were of gold." His industry in exploring the treasures of ancient His Industry literature, and acquainting himself not only with, their t)io'^'ied"eun- contents of thought, but with the force of words, and der difficulties with shades of meaning, must have been something ^^'^'^"'^P'^ ^ "S simply Herculean, when we recollect that lexicons and grammars and editions did not exist in his day. But a memory of the literary kind, strongly tenacious by nature, 20 MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. Erasmus' Greek Testa- ment a noble monument of zeal and patience. General survey of his literary services. His transla- tions. nature, was doubtless developed into extraordinary power through the enforced habit of self-reliance. His edition of the New Testarhent is, with reference to the then state of scholarship, a noble monument of his zeal and patience. To collate the various ac- cessible MSS. for the Greek Text, to amend the cor- rupt Vulgate version, to examine with scrupulous care every verse and every word, to complete the explana- tion by annotations and paraphrases, to bestow the toil of two or three days occasionally on a single ex- pression : all this implies a task of immense severity, of which he could not but himself speak in the most impressive way. Perhaps we shall not be wrong in naming his Testa- ment as his noblest contribution — ^whether we look at the spirit, the execution, or the design of the work — to the literary and religious life of Europe. Turning to his general writings, which fill nine or ten ponderous folios, we may take a brief bird's eye view of their subjects under a few different heads, byway of reminding ourselves of the character and extent of his services. In the field of classical literature, he was a " gatherer and disposer of other men's stuff" ; he devoted himself to the humble but most useful em- ployment of providing conduits through which the streams of ancient wisdom might flow to the minds of those who had begun to feel the new thirst for know- ledge. We find among his works translations or notes on portions of Lucian, of Galen, of Euripides, of Ovid, of Plutarch, of Socrates,, of Xenophon ; while in his Adages and Epigrams, as well as the following Apoph- thegms we have rich gatherings from the oft-gleaned harvest of Greek and Roman letters. But the name- less MEMOIR OF ERASMUS. * 21 less spirit of noble antiquity, the taste, the judgment, The true clas- the harmony of feeling which we have long been taught feeiine^pt"- to call classical, pervades all his writings. They are vades all his seasoned with Attic salt ; or sprinkled with Helico- nian dew. A further great service to literature and theology His editions pf was rendered in his editions of the Fathers. One of ^ ^^ "^' his chief objects, as he explains in his " Ratio verae Theologiae," was to explode that false and absurd sys- tem of exegesis of Scripture which prevailed amongst the Schoolmen, and which indeed still survives in the popular preaching of our day, — ^by which a verse or Some of the phrase torn from its context, and historical connexion, ^^^^ niethods is made to yield any sense that may suit the fancy of 'he Schoolmen , . ' _ . ^ . . . , yet survive in the expositor. He pomts to Ongen m particular as the popular exemplifying the true historical method, which, applied Pleaching of in our time with fuller and ever-widening knowledge, is constantly throwing fresh light on the religious life and opinions of mankind. These editions of the Fathers — including Jerome, Hilary, Ambrose, Irenseus, Augustine, Chiysostom, with fragments of Basil, Lac- tantius, Epiphanius, Cyprian, Athanasius, constitute another of the toils of this Hero of Letters. In his works on practical religion, Erasmus pre- His works on sents himself in another aspect, that of the ethical and ij^on"^* ^' Christian teacher. This is not the place in which to give any detailed account of this branch of his life- work; it must be sufficient to name in passing the " Institute of a Christian Prince," the " Handbook of the Christian soldier," the " Institute of Christian Ma- trimony," the " Christian widow," the " Mode of Prayer to God," the "Preparation for Death" (written in his closing days), the "Expostulation of Jesus with perish- ing 22 SOCRATES. This sentence did the Poete thus expresse, in one of his Satires woorde for woorde. Non viuas vt edas, sed edas, vt viuere possis. Line not as a glutton, still for to eate. But feede to maintain life, by thy meate. CQ^ Those persones, whiche would glue credence vnto the vnlearned, and vnexperte multitude of the people, Socrates affirmed to doe euen like, as if a man refusyng one peece of money of fower grotes, would not take it in paimente, and yet a greate nomber of like refuse peces, cast in an heape together, he would allowe for curraunt, and receiue them in paimente. He that is not ^ Whom ye would not trust by hymself alone, is himself^s not °°^ °^^ whitte better to be trusted, in a greate rable to be trusted in of soche like feloes as hymself is : for it forceth not a multitude, of j^^^ greate a nomber thei be, but howgraue and sub- he is. stanciall. A counterfaict pece of coigne, be it euen in neuer so greate an heape, is a counterfaict peece. This maketh against the estem)aig of witnesses, by the multitude of theim, and againste the iudgementes of the common people, beyng vnlearned. _ J AVhen Machines sued, to be one of the nomber jEschines vrsis of Socrates his disciples and scholars, ^nd did afterwarde a shamefasjly laie pouertee for his excuse, sai)mg, and at contin- that it was a great greef vnto him, where the uaii strief with other frendes of Socrates, beyng wealthie, gaue His saiyngs' vnto hym many greate giftes, that he had no- foioeinthis thyng for to giue, excepte his owne self : Dooest The entle'to *^°" ^°^ vnderstande (quoth Socrates again) wardnes of how great a present thou hast brought and giuen raiuTng s"cho- '"^' ^^^epte percase thou estemest thy self at a lars. lowe price ? Therefore, I shall doe my diligence, The office of a that I male restore thee home again to thy self, maister! ° '' ^ better man then I receiued thee. H Other Sophistes whereas thei taught nothing but mere THE I. BOOKE. 23 mere trifles, yet thei would receiue,''ne take not a scholare, without a greate fee. But Socrates tooke this poore man, euen with a good will, as the greate riche gentlemen. When a certaine persone tolde hym newes, 52. saiyng the Atheniens haue Judged thee to death : Death com- Euen so hath nature doen theim, quoth he againe. ^°"s° ^oSgh 11 Meanyng, that it is no verie greate shrewde '" f""* ""^ " . . ° waie to some toume, if a bodie be violentlie put to death, assured an other, naturally to bee dedde ere long after, although no man should slea hym. Albeit certaine writers ascrib- yng this saiying to the Philosophier Anaxagoras. Unto his wife, after the womennes facion wail- 53. lyng, and saiyng : Ah my sweete housbande, thou ?*"" '° *"" shalt dye nothing guiltee, and without any of- an offender, fence doyng : What, wife (saith he) haddest thou rather, that I should dye an offender .' The death of goodmen is % The death of good men, euen for this poinct is nottpbe ' .„,,,., T . , wailled. not to be warned, that thei bee put to execucion with- Amoche more out desemyng : but thei been double worthie to be miserable wailled for, which suflfre death for hainous offences, de'J^^ed pun- but yet of the two a moche more miserable thing it is, ishment then to haue deserued punishement, then to haue sufifred. frej"^"* ™^' Thesame daie that Socrates should drinke the 54. poison, one * Apollodorus ( for to comfort him '" Athenes the , ' 1 - , i\ 11 1 racion was, by soche meanes as he could ) cam and brought that persones vnto hym a riche robe, of a greate valour, that condemned to , . , , . ,. , , 1 • 1- death Should he might haue it on his backe, at his diyng drinke tempred houre. But he refusing the gift, What ( saieth T'i* wine, the , , , . , r 1 1 • 1 1 ^1 '"'<=e of Hera- he) this robe of myne own here, which hath locke.whiche is been honest enough for me in my life tyme, woll so extreme ... , , r T 1 , cold,thatwhen it not be euen like honest for me, after 1 bee de- the heat. of the parted out of the worlde > ^'"^^ ^°^ ^°- ^ damly conuey ^ Utterly damning the pompepus facion of some !' '° '*?« hart, it people, with wonderfull high studic, makyng prouision & de"threme°-" afore 24 SOCRATES. dilesse. Fotim- afore hande, that thei maie be caried to their bunall, medially shall g^ ^^^^ ^j^gj ^^^^ ^jg lajgd in their graues, with aU wor- the extreme . . , partes of the ship possible. body (as the handes andfeete) waxe cold,and so by litde and little, the colde waxelh to the harte, & as sone as it striketh to the hart, there is no remedie,but death out of hand. Albeit, if one drinke thesame iuice, first by it self alone not ternpred with wine, there is remedie enough. For, if one drinke a good draught of wine after it, the heate of the wine, shall ouercome the cblde of the heille, aiid driue it from the harte and so saue the life. * This Apollodorus was of Athmes, a Poete that wrote comedies,ther was an other Apollodorus of thesame citee, a teacher of Gramnjer, there were also fower mo of thesame name, but of other countrees. 55. To one bringyng hym woorde, that a certaine UnwrathfuUie fgiQg (jj^j gpeake euill of hym : and gaue him a ^P° ™- verie euil report. Marie (quoth Socrates) he hath not learned to speake well. Thei that giue f Imputyng his toungesore, not vnto malicious- vs euill repotte nesse ; but vnto the default of right knowlege. Neither mente,\m rft ^^^ ^^ iu^ge to perteine to hym, what soche persones cancardnesse talked Oil hym, as dooe speake of a caficardnesse of of harte, are to stomacke^'& not of a iudgemente. be contempned ' ° 56. When Antisthenes a Philosophierof the secte Of the secte of of the Ciniques, did weare vpon his backe a robe, thesame'pf^. with a great hole or rupture in it, and by turnyng - thesame rupture outwarde, did purposely shewe it, that euery bodie might looke vpon it : Through the rent of thy cloke ( quoth Socrates ) I see thy peignted sheath, and vain gloriousnesse. H Featelie notyng, that ' vainglorie of poore gar- mentes and couer clothyng, is moche more shameful! '^'1^ "?^'^ ^t ^°