The Engraved Gems OF Classical Time J. H. Middle ton Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030680882 NK5565 !m62" ""'™"">' """^ + ^'iinii™flr.^.Yf?„.9,P'"^ °' classical times, olin 3 1924 030 680 882 Overs THE ENGRAVED GEMS OF CLASSICAL TIMES. HDnfion: C J. CLAY & SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, Ave Maria Lane. ffiamfreillBe: DEIGHTON, BELL AND CO. Eeip5iB: F. A. BROCKHAUS. 0tia aotit: MACMILLAN AND CO. THE ENGRAVED GEMS OF CLASSICAL TIMES WITH A CATALOGUE OF THE GEMS IN THE FITZWILLIAM MUSEUM. BY J. HENRY MIDDLETON, SLADE PROFESSOR OF FINE ART, DIRECTOR OF THE FITZWILLIAM MUSEUM, AND FELLOW OF KING'S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE ; AUTHOR OF "ANCIENT ROME IN 1888." CAMBRIDGE : AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1891 [AU Rights reserved.'] ■^ ^ ^ BRARV^ V ®am6t(lige : PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. MEMORIAE VIRI CARISSIMI CAROLI WILHELMI KING. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preface and List of Authorities. Page ix to xv. CHAPTER I. Page i to i6. Scarabs, Cylinders and other early Signets. CHAPTER II. Page 17 to 34. Greek Gems. CHAPTER III. Page 35 to 46. ' Greek Gems (continued) and Etruscan Scarabs. CHAPTER IV. Page 47 to 58. Roman Gems. CHAPTER V. Page 59 to 65. Cameo Gems. CHAPTER VI. Page 66 to 83. Inscriptions on Gems. CHAPTER VII. Page 84 to 96. Inscriptions on Gems (continued). CHAPTER VIII. Page 97 to 102. The characteristics of ancient Gems. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER IX. Page 103 to 120. The technique of Gem-engraving. CHAPTER X. Page 121 to 128. Gems in mediaeval times. CHAPTER XI. Page 129 to 139. The materials used for engraved Gems. CHAPTER XII. Page 140 to 157. The materials used for engraved Gems (continued). APPENDIX. Catalogue of the Gems in the Fitzwilliam Museum Page i to XXV. INDEX. PREFACE. IN the following pages I have attempted to give a brief account of the engraved gems and other forms of signet which were used by the chief classical races of ancient times. The book is intended for the general use of students of archaeology, and has been written with the hope that it may in some cases lead the reader to a more detailed and practical study of this most fascinating subject. The various tools and technical processes used by the ancient gem-engravers have been discussed at some length, since a close attention to these points is specially desirable as a much-needed help in the frequently difficult task of dis- tinguishing between gems of different origin and date. With regard to the Appendix containing the catalogue of the gems in the Fitzwilliam Museum, I have attempted to indicate the period to which each gem seems to belong, in spite of the great difficulty there is, very frequently, in attaining to anything like certainty on this point. Even though in many cases my judgment may be erroneous, yet, on the whole, the attempt to distinguish periods of workmanship has its use, in giving the reader a notion of the general style and character of the gem in question. The gems which are described in this catalogue were, with very few exceptions, collected by Colonel Leake, the X PREFACE. distinguished author of valuable works on the Topography of Athens and other kindred subjects. They came into the pos- session of the Fitzwilliam Museum in the following manner. By his will, dated Jan. 17, 1859, Colonel Leake bequeathed to his wife for her life his whole collection of books, coins, gems, bronzes, vases and other antiques, with the provision that at her death, the whole collection should be offered to the University of Cambridge for the sum of ;^5000. Colonel Leake died in i860, and his widow died in 1863. It was then decided, by a vote of the Senate on Feb. 4, 1864, that Colonel Leake's testamentary offer should be accepted and that ;£'5ooo out of the funds of the Fitzwilliam Museum should be devoted to this important acquisition. The actual value of the whole Leake collection was probably double of the sum paid for it, and its value has largely increased since 1864. The coins alone are now worth considerably more than the ;^50oo which was paid for the whole collection. In 1870 a catalogue of Colonel Leake's gems was pub- lished by the late Charles William King, M.A., Senior Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, the well-known author of many works on antique gems, which are full of interesting matter illustrated by the widest reading and the most copious learning. At this time, however, Mr King's eyesight had begun to fail, and in consequence of that a certain number of inaccuracies crept into his descriptions which make it de- sirable that another catalogue should be prepared, illustrated by a photographic process which gives the actual character of each gem better than the woodcuts in Mr King's work. Mr King's chief works on gems were the following — Antique gems, 1866; Precious Stones and Metals, 1865; re- printed in Bohn's Series in 1883; Handbook of engraved gems, 1866; Antique gems and rings, 2 vols. 1872; The Gnostics and their remains, enlarged edition, 1887. And also a large number of articles on gems published in the PREFACE. XI A rchaeological Journal, Vols. XVIII., xix., and others. All these works are full of valuable matter, and are written in the most interesting style. Mr King's own collection of gems, consisting of 330 examples of various dates, was formed by him between the years 1845 and 1877. In 1 88 1 it was sold to an American gentleman, Mr J. T. Johnston, who presented the whole collection to the Metro- politan Museum in New York City. A descriptive catalogue, written by Mr King in 1878, was published by the New York Museum in 1882. Mr King died suddenly in London on the 26th of March, 1888. Of his loss as a friend it is impossible to speak — " aeternumque Nulla dies nobis maerorem e pectore demet." J. HEN. MIDDLETON. King's College, Cambridge. WORKS ON ANTIQUE GEMS'. A large number of the most valuable monographs on gems are scattered through the volumes of the chief archaeo- logical periodicals of England, France, Germany and Italy; with the names of which classical students will be familiar. Books on gems of the 17th and i8th centuries are now of but little value except for the records they supply, showing, in certain cases, that a special gem is not, at least, one of quite modern production. The chief works of this class are these : Agostini, Gemine antiche figurate, 2 vols., Roma, 1686. De la Chausse, Gemme antiche di Michelangelo Causeo de la Chausse, Roma, 1700. Maffei, Gemme antiche di Dom. de Rossi colle sposizioni di P. A. Maffei, Roma, 1707. Stosch, Gemm.ae antiquae caelatae, Amsterdam, 1724, and the same collection described by Winckelmann, Pierres gravies du feii. Baron de Stosch, Flo- rence, 1760. Zanetti, Dactyliotheca, Rome, 1747. Mariette, Traits des pierres gravees, Paris, 1750; a.nd Mziscum Odescalchum, sive thesaurus gemmarum, Rome, 1751- Gori, Museum Florentinicm, Florence, 173 1 — 1762. Natter, Traiti des pierres gravees, London, 1761. 1 The most important works in English on engraved gems are those written by C. W. King, a list of which is given in the Preface on page x. XIV WORKS ON ANTIQUE GEMS. Gori, Dactyliotheca Smithiana, Venice, 1767. Worlidge, Antique gems, London, 1768. Cipriani, Drawings of 100 gems in the Marlborough Collection, engraved by Bartolozzi, 2 vols, folio, 1780 — 1791. Raspe, Catalogue of gems cast in paste by James Tassie, London, 1791. Many other large and costly works with illustrations of antique gems were published in the i8th century, but the engravings of that time give little or no notion of the real character of the gems they represent, the main object of the artist being to give a pretty picture rather than a faithful copy. Among more recent works the following are the most valuable — Toelken, Erkldrendes Verzeichniss der antiken vertieft ge- schnittenen Steine, Berlin, 1835. Kohler, Gesammelte Schriften, herausgegeben von L. Stephani, St Petersburg, 1850—1853. Panofka, Gemmen mit Inschriften, printed in Abhandlungen der K5nig. Akad. der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1851, PP- 385—519- Brunn, Geschichte der Griechischen Ki'mstler, Brunswick, 1859, Vol. II., pp. 444 — &n ; and new edition, 1889, Vol. Ii., PP- 303—433- Chabouillet, Catalogue des cam^es et pierres gravies de la Bibliotheque Imperiale, Paris, 1858. Stephani and others, Compte-rendu de la Commission Imperiale ArcMologique, St Petersburg, i860 to the present time; and, dealing with the same subject, Antiquith du Bos- phore Cimm^rien, St Petersburg, 1854. Gerhard, Gesammelte akademische Abhandlungen tmd klcine Schriften, Berlin, 1866. Miiller-Wieseler, Denhndler der alien Kunst, Theil II., Gottin- gen, 1869. WORKS ON ANTIQUE GEMS. XV H. N. Story-Maskelyne, Catalogue of the Marlborough gems, privately printed, London, 1870. Milchhoefer, Die Anfdnge der Ku7ist in Griechenland, Leipzig, 1883, pp. 78 to 90. Furtwangler and others, Mykenisclie Vasen, Berlin, 1886. A. H. Smith, Catalogue of gems in the British Museum., with an Introduction by A. S. Murray, London, i{ Other works are referred to in the following text. XVI LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Page 4, fig. I ; Babylonian cylinder of c. 2600 B.C. Pages 7 to II, figs. 2 to 12; Various forms of "Hittite" signets. Page 14, fig. 13; Phoenician scarab of mixed Egyptian and Assyrian style. Page 19, fig. 14; Glandular gem with rude figure of an ibex. Page 19, fig. 15 ; Lenticular gem, with two goats of heraldic style. Page 25, fig. 16; Satyr and wine-cup ; Greek gem of the 6th century B.C. Page 26, fig. 17 ; Hero with bow and arrow ; Greek scarab of the finest style. Page 30, fig. 18; Lion and stag: fine Greek work of the 5th century B.C. Page 41, fig. 19; Portrait head of Eumenes I., king of Per- gamus. Page 66, fig. 20 ; Jewish signet with owner's name ; 9th or 8th century B.C. Page 105, fig. 21 ; Gem showing a man working with the drill and bow. Page 107, fig. 22 ; Etruscan scarab, with rude drill-work. Page 108, fig. 23 ; Lenticular gem, showing the use of the tubular drill. Page 1 10, fig. 24 ; Lenticular gem showing the use of the wheel. Page 1 12, fig. 25 ; Head of Zeus ; Greek scarab of finest style, showing the use of the diamond-point. APPENDIX. Plate I. Greek gems in the Fitzwilliam Museum, to face p. xxvi. Plate II. Roman gems in the Fitzwilliam Museum. CHAPTER I. Scarabs, Cylinders, and other Early Signets. In early times, when writing was a rare accomplishment practised by few except professional scribes or members of a priesthood, hard stones or jewels engraved with a name or a device were of special importance from their use as signets, the impression of which gave that authenticity and authority to a document which in modern times is more usually conferred by a written signature. The signet of a king was commonly Use of regarded as an authoritative symbol of his power, which he "'^"^ ' could delegate to a subject by entrusting to him the royal seal, with permission to use it : as, for example in ancient Egypt, when the Pharaoh of the time invested Joseph with vice-regal power over his kingdom, " Pharaoh took off his signet ring from his hand, and put it upon Joseph's hand," Gen. xli. 42, Revised Version. In the same way a duplicate of Augustus' signet was entrusted to a friend in Rome for use during the Emperor's absence on military expeditions ; see below, page 49 ; and cf Dio Cass. LIII. 30. It was not until a comparatively late period, about the 4th century B.C., that engraved gems were commonly treated as personal ornaments. At first they were made and used simply for the practical purpose of signets. Scarabs : The earliest class of signets which now exist, Scarabs with the exception of some Egyptian rings made wholly of gold, are in the form of the sacred scarabaeus beetle of Egypt, the symbol of the Sun-god Ra, the P'ertilizer of v.. M. I set as rings. SCARABS AND [CHAP. I. Revolving mounts. Materials of scarabs. Cylinders. the World'. The back of the scarab is cut into the beetle form, and the signet- device, usually a hieroglyphic inscription, is cut on the flat underside of the scarab. A hole drilled longitudinally through the scarab allowed it to be set in a simple ring (SoktiIXio?) of gold or other metal, with a wire or swivel passing through the perforation, so that, when required for use as a signet, the scarab could be revolved, and its flat side brought outwards and pressed on wax, clay or other soft plastic substance. Some of the signet-scarabs which are too large for setting in a ring were worn on a string round the neck ; a method which appears to have been one of the earliest ways of wearing any kind of signet. It should however be noticed that the scarabs of Egypt were made for many other purposes besides that of signets^ and the majority of them are not cut in hard stone or crystal, but are moulded in clay or worked out of the comparatively soft steatite, a vitreous glaze being applied by the maker both to steatite and clay scarabs^ In point of date the oldest scarab-signets of Egypt go back to a very remote period : examples have been found with the names of kings of the 4th Dynasty, dating about 3700 years B.C. In later times the scarab form of signet was adopted by the Phoenicians, the Greeks and other races, who either directly or' indirectly came under Egyptian influence. Cylinders : another very early class of signet is the cylinder of Assyria and Babylon, measuring most commonly from f of an inch to i^ inches long, and about half an inch to an inch in diameter. These are not made of clay, like so many of the Egyptian scarabs, but are cut out of hard stones, 1 The scarabaeus beetle (Egyptian Kheper) was adopted. as this symbol on account of its moulding large balls of clay, round like the world, in which it encloses its eggs. The heat of the sun hatches the eggs, and the young beetles burst forth from the clay ball. " The great bulk of them, especially those made of pottery, were sacred charms or amulets rather than signets. ' The Fitzwilliam Museum possesses a good collection of this class of scarab : they are described in the forthcoming catalogue of Egyptian objects in the Museum by Mr Budge. CHAP. I.] CYLINDERS. such as green jasper, rock crystal, chalcedony, haematite, carnelian, or more rarely amethyst and lapis lazuli. These cylinders are drilled longitudinally with a hole of sufficient diameter to receive a woollen or linen cord instead of a metal wire, and they were worn as a bracelet on the wrist, or else strung round the neck'. Though used primarily by the powerful races of the Euphrates Valley, these cylinder signets were not unknown among other nations, such as the Semites of Phoenicia and Palestine, and even in the early island colonies of the Phoenicians. The "signet and the cord," mentioned in Genesis xxxviii. i8 and 25, Revised Version (or "signet and bracelets" of the Old Version) are examples of this use of the cylinder. So also in Canticles viii. 6, the phrase occurs " set me as a seal upon thine arm." A very large number of these Babylonian and Assyrian cylinders still exist; they appear to have been used by all except the very poorest classes. They are usually engraved with the name of the owner in cuneiform characters, together with figures of various deities, accompanied frequently by attendant genii or worshippers. A very favourite subject, especially among the earliest cylinders, is a deity or a king slaying a lion. The sacred tree (H6m) between two guardian beasts or winged figures of human form occurs very often. This latter is the most characteristic of the designs used by the inhabitants of the Euphrates valley ; from them it was adopted by the Phoenicians, and thus spread over an area as wide as the whole range of Phoenician trade, that is through- out the whole of the shores and islands of the Mediterranean. This very early and widely popular design was largely used by the Tyrian builders of Solomon's temple, as we read in I Kings, chaps, vi. and vii., and in 2 Chronicles, chaps, iii. to v., where the device is mentioned as being repeated again and again in various materials under the name of " the palm- tree and the winged cherubim ^" Method of spearing [cylinders. Designs on cylinders. Palm-tree and Cherubim. ^ In a few cases the cylinder is mounted on a metal pin with a boss at each end to hold it fast, but this is quite exceptional. ^ The Phoenician scarab illustrated in fig. 13, page 14, has examples of the winged Cherubim of Assyria. 1—2 BABYLONIAN AND [CHAP. I. Dates of cylinders. The cylinder signet of a private person commonly has a figure of his special deity, and often a representation of the owner standing by in the attitude of worship. The inscription usually gives the name both of the deity and of the owner ; as, for example, a fine haematite cylinder in the British Museum which is inscribed thus, " Abum-ilu the scribe, son of Nur-Martu, the servant of the god Martu (Rimmon)." Examples of these cylinders exist extending over a very wide period of time, from about 2600 B.C. to 200 B.C. or even later. Some of them are very fine examples of ancient Oriental art, designed with much spirit and executed with wonderful minuteness and delicacy of touch in the highly decorative and conventional style which is common to all the best Assyrian sculpture, whatever its scale may be. Those of early date are the finest and most powerful in style ; as, for example, a magnificent Babylonian cylinder of jasper in the British Museum, the signet of a scribe, dating about 2600 B.C., on which is cut a very noble figure of the deified hero Gistubar strangling a lion': see fig. i. Fig. 1. Impression from an early Babylonian cylinder of the finest style; with the name of the owner and his deity in cuneiform characters, between two repre- sentations (reversed) of the same subject — Gistubar strangling a lion : real size. Sanson I. The equally fine cylinder of Sargon I. (in Paris) is closely similar in style to this, and seems to be the work of the same engraver. The very decorative treatment of the hair, both of the heroes and of the lions, is specially noticeable. 1 On the fine cylinders of this early period the most frequent subjects are Gistubar and his companion Hea-bant slaying lions or bulls, sometimes separately and sometimes together, like Heracles and lolaos in early Greek art. CHAP. I.] ASSYRIAN CYLINDERS. 5 Persian cylinders. The date of Sargon I. is not known with any certainty. According to some archaeologists his reign was as early as about 2800 B.C. If so, the date of the cylinder shown in fig. I would probably be two centuries earlier than is suggested above. In later times, under the Persian conquerors Darius and Xerxes, Babylon produced cylinders of very minute and delicate workmanship, showing the influence of Greek art, but inferior in spirit and vigour to the engravings of earlier date. The most remarkable example of this, dating from the end of the 6th century B.C., is the signet of Darius Hystaspes, a jasper cylinder engraved with the king in a chariot hunting lions, and with the cuneiform inscription, " I am Darius, the Great King " thrice repeated in the Persian, Median and Assyrian languages. This also is in the British Museum. Lastly, the cylinders of the 3rd century B.C. are very rude in design and of the coarsest, most clumsy workmanship. The cylinder form of signet was also used, though not Egyptian commonly, in Egypt. The Egyptian cylinders are, as a rule, not made of crystal or jasper, but of pottery or steatite covered with a blue glaze, exactly like the scarabs : on them are cut or moulded, not large figure subjects, but hieroglyphic in- scriptions. They appear to have been usually worn round the neck. The custom of wearing the cylinder-signet as an orna- ment appears to have led to the use of plain unengraved cylinders, strung on necklaces like large beads. A great many of these in rock-crystal and glass have been found in the tombs of Camiros in- Rhodes and elsewhere in the Greek islands and sea-port towns. When used as a signet the cylinder was rolled over a soft lump of wax or clay, which was thus flattened out over the surface destined to receive the seal, and at the same time received the impress of the cylinder^ The fine clay used for sealing not only with cylinders, but also with other forms of ^ See Book of Job, xxxviii. 14, where Heaven, with its night and morning, is described as being " changed as clay under the seal. " Use of cylinder. 6 CYLINDERS AND CONES. [CHAP. I. engraved gems, was called 7^ arj/jbavrpU {arjfiaiva) to seal). Herodotus (ii. 38) describes the Egyptian priests using this clay to mark with their signets the animals which were accepted for sacrifice. Many examples of these clay seals have been found in Egypt, used for many different pur- poses, both religious and secular ; see page ^ty. Stamps on The method of sealing by rolling an engraved cylinder pottery. ^^^^ ^^^^ ^j^^. ^ppg^j-g ^o have suggested a form of decoration, which was largely used by the potters of Etruria for the shoulders of their colossal jars {pit/ioi), of which a great number of examples, mostly dating from the 6th or 5th century B.C., still exist. The patterns on these were moulded in relief on the plastic clay, after the jar was " thrown " on the wheel, but before it was fired, by rolling along a cylinder or disc, on the edge of which the design was sunk. These discs were usually about 9 or 10 inches in circumference, and therefore the pattern repeats regularly at that interval. The subjects on these bands are rows of animals, Tritons and the like, often very similar in design and style to the sculptured reliefs on the architrave from the Temple at Assos, now in the Louvre. Coties. Conical signets : in Assyria, even at an early period, signets of conical form, of the same materials as the cylinders, were sometimes used. These cones, with the device sunk on the broad end, were pressed on rounded lumps of clay in which a piece of string was embedded for the attachment of the seal to a document. The mediaeval system of sealing was similar to this, pendant seals of wax being fastened to parchment deeds by a cord embedded in the wax. Many of the so-called Hittite signets are conical in form, see pages 7 and 8, figs. 2 and 3. The later Persian signet-gems, from about the time of Alexander downwards, were also very commonly cut, not in the form of cylinders, but of truncated cones. These belong to a period of artistic decadence, and are usually poor in design and coarse in execution ; a great contrast to the magnificent vigour of the figures on the early Assyrian CHAP. I.] " HITTITE " SIGNETS. 7 cylinders of about 2600 B.C., and also to the delicate minute- ness of the Persian cylinders of the 5th century B.C.' " HiTTITE " GEMS, so-called. The name " Hittite " has been given to a very remarkable and primitive class of signets, which appear to have been made by some powerful race, whose influence extended throughout a considerable portion of Northern Syria and Asia Minor, at a very early period, perhaps fifteen or sixteen centuries B.C. These signets do not, strictly speaking, belong to the class of gems ; as they are mostly cut out of the softer stones, such as steatite and fine limestones, marbles and serpentine of various colours — black, white, red and brown : a few are on an inferior variety of pale green jasper. They are however of very great interest to the student of early gems, since many of them appear to be prototypes of the lenticular '' Island gems ;" and others of various forms seem to show the gradual modification of the cylinder into the cone-signet, and the fur- ther change from the cone to the hemispherical or annular seal. The variety of the shapes of these " Hittite " gems is very great, but none of them appear to have been set in rings ; all were suspended in some way by a cord, probably round the neck of the owner. The following are the chief forms of these signets : I . Rude cylinders of the Assyrian shape. 'Hittite" Changes of form. Fig. ... 2. Cones, with the principal device on the base, and the hole or groove for suspension near its smaller end ; see fig. 2. 1 For an account of cylinders and other Oriental gems, see De Vogiie VARIOUS FORMS [CHAP. I. Cone signets. If the cone is pierced the hole is drilled at right angles to its axis, not lo,ngitudinally as in the cylinders. Some of these conical signets are engraved with figures, not only on the base, but also round the sides of the cone, thus forming a link with the cylindrical shape of signet. Another variety of the cone is very short in proportion to its diameter, almost hemispherical in shape ; see fig. 3. Ring signets. Fig. 3. This variety, with its hole for suspension enlarged, leads to the annular form of signet. 3. A ring-like stone, in which the perforation is not large enough for the signet to be worn on the finger; it must therefore have been suspended in the usual way by a cord ; see fig. 4. Fig. A further development of this shape, which rarely occurs. Fig. 5. Melanges (TArchhlogie Orientate ; Paris, if aramaischen &'c. Inschriften, Breslau, i8( glyptique Orientate, Paris, 1886. ; Levy, Siegel und Gemmen niit and Menant, Recherches sur la CHAP. I.] OF " HITTITE " SIGNETS. 9 is an actual finger-ring cut out of stone, with one side flattened to form the bezel for the signet device ; see fig. 5. 4. Another form among these signets is a rectangular Gable tablet, flat on the lower side where the device is cut, and ■^'"''^' shaped like a low-pitched roof on the other side, giving in section a triangle with one obtuse and two acute angles, the latter being rounded off; see fig. 6. The perforation runs longitudinally through the tablet. 5. A great many of these signets have the bean-like. Bean lenticular shape of the so-called "Island gems," usually with ■''"'"• a longitudinal perforation, but sometimes, instead of that, with a groove cut all round the rim of the disc, allowing a cord or wire to be securely wrapped round the signet. A few of the conical signets also were suspended in the same way (see fig. 2), not by means of a hole drilled through them, but by a groove cut round the smaller end of the cone. Out of this form the handled sigfiet was developed, class no. 7, described below. 6. Another less frequent variety seems to have developed out of the cylinder by slicing its round sides off, making it square or polygonal in section, and thus giving four or more surfaces for separate devices, instead of the continuous band of the cylinder. 7. Handled signets ; a large proportion of these signets Signets are cut into various shapes with handles worked out of the handles. same piece of stone. The flat surface where the device is cut is of many forms, circular, oval, square, rectangular or lobed. The handles too vary greatly in shape, some being short projections, only sufficient to receive the perforation for the suspension of the seal, see fig. 7. Others have tall handles, in some cases moulded into ornamental forms at the place lO VARIOUS FORMS [CHAP. I. Fig. 7. where the cord passed through the handle : see figs. 8, 9 and 10. Chester collection. Fig. 8. Fig. 10. Like the seals shown in figs. 2 to 12, the finest and most elaborate of these handled signets is among the very fine collection of " Hittite " gems, the most important in the world, formed by the Rev. Greville Chester, and now in the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford. This is a large cubical signet cut out of a fine piece of black magnetite, with minutely engraved figures of deities on five sides of the cube. The pierced handle is elaborately moulded, in a fashion which suggests metal-work rather than hard stone. The workmanship of this remarkable signet is very delicate and skilful, a striking contrast to the usual very coarse figures on the " Hittite " seals. Though resembling in general form the handled signets of the '' Hittite" class, it is most probably the work of a Phoenician gem-engraver : it was found in or near Antaradus on the coast of Phoenicia'. ^ It has been described and illustrated by Professor Sayce, Atxh. Journ. Vol. XLIV. 1887, pp. 347 to 360. CHAP. I.] OF "hittite" signets. II The devices on the " Hittite " signets are usually extremely rude and coarsely cut, most of the sinking being done with large drills and wheels, with but little help from subsequent re-touching. Animals, such as goats and stags, and others too coarsely drawn to be distinguished, together with very rude human figures frequently occur. Other signets have simple geometrical patterns, formed mainly by combinations of wheel-cut straight lines, (see figs. II and 12) closely resembling the seme patterns which fill up Devices on Hittite signets. Fig. II. Fig. 12. the backgrounds of early Greek pottery of the so-called "Oriental" and "Dipylon" types. Some of these signets have no more elaborate device than rows of drill-sunk holes, like the sixes on ordinary ivory dice; see figs. 5 and 10. There is however in the Chester collection (Ashmolean Museum) one remarkable circular signet, with a rounded handle cut out of hard whitish limestone, the device on which is a much more skilful piece of work. Within a circular, hatched border is a double-headed eagle "displayed," very like the heraldic eagle of mediaeval Austria, designed with much spirit and decorative power. The same device occurs on some of the rock-cut reliefs of Asia Minor, which have been attributed to the same " Hittite " race. This double-headed eagle was adopted as his badge by the cele- brated Moslem conqueror Saladin, who may possibly have taken it from some of these early reliefs. It is to be seen over one of the gates of the citadel of Cairo, which is said to have been built by Saladin, or more probably by one of his successors. It certainly was copied and introduced into Western Europe by the Crusaders of the 12th century A.D., Ragle signet. Badge of Salahed- din. 12 " HITTITE " SIGNETS AND [CHAP. I. The name '' Hittite.'" and thus the famihar "displayed eagle" of Austria may have originated in the device used by some chief of the once powerful eastern race', w^hich used these very interesting and primitive signets. With regard to the word " Hittite," as applied to signets and sculpture of uncertain date and origin, it should be , observed that the name is a somewhat misleading one, since although monuments of the people who are so called have been found in the country of the Hittites, that is, in the district inhabited by the Canaanites of Coele-Syria, yet they are also largely found in regions with which, as far as is known, the true Hittites had no connection. Nevertheless, the name which was given to this class of objects at their first discovery may be provisionally retained, until further researches have led to more accurate information on the subject. Phoenician Gems. Egypto- Phoenician scarabs. A large number of scarabs made of pottery or steatite in the Egyptian form, but with almost meaningless copies of Egyptian designs with blundered hieroglyphic inscriptions, coarsely executed, are found in Rhodes, Cyprus and other islands of the Mediterranean ; some of them apparently are as early as the 14th to the loth century B.C. These imitations of Egyptian work were probably made by Phoenician settlersl In some cases these Phoenician copies are made oi paste or glass, and have the back simply rounded, instead of being shaped like the sacred beetle, a form which is usually called the scarabaeoid, from its having the general outline without the detail of the true scarab. 1 I have to thank Mr A. J. Evans, keeper of the Ashmolean Museum, for ample opportunity to examine the gems at Oxford, both those in the Museum, and in his own very valuable private collection, and also for many useful suggestions on the subject. ^ The Fitzwilliam Museum possesses a good collection of these "Island scarabs." CHAP. I.] PHOENICIAN SCARABS. 13 No. 3 in the Catalogue of the Fitzwilliam gems, from Camiros in Rhodes, is a good example of this class (see PI. I.), and, though small in scale, it is a characteristic specimen of Phoenician art, which most commonly combines the types of Assyria and of Egypt, fusing them into one design, with very little admixture of any forms which are of purely Phoenician origin. In other cases Phoenician gems are either wholly Egyptian or wholly Assyrian in style ; and even when Phoenician deities are represented, such as Baal-Melkarth or Baal-Moloch, they are usually treated to some extent after the fashion of either Egypt or Assyria. One remarkable signet in the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford consists of a steatite scarab of Egypto-Phoenician style, set in an open bronze frame with a small ring for suspen- sion, very much like a form of seal which was commonly used in the last century. In most cases, however, the Phoe- nician scarabs which, like those of Egypt, have a longitudinal perforation, were set in a swivel mount, not in a handled setting. In later times, from the Sth to the 4th centuries B.C., a large number of scarabs and scarabaeoids of very superior workmanship were made by the Phoenicians, both for their own use and for purposes of trade. These gems, engraved in the harder stones, such as jasper, chalcedony and carnelian, are commonly found in Phoenicia itself, throughout Syria, and in the islands of the Mediterranean. Some of these scarabs have engraved devices of great beauty and most delicate execution, arranged and treated with that remarkable decorative skill for which the Phoe- nician artists were so celebrated. The finest of these, cut in chalcedony or sard, have Egyptian deities and sacred symbols arranged, not with any special meaning, but simply so as to fill up the space in the most decorative and graceful way. One or two examples in the Ashmolean Museum are among the finest which exist : they were brought from the coast of Phoenicia by Mr Greville Chester, and probably are considerably earlier in date than the scarabs from Tharros. Their minute workmanship and very high finish is as re- Symboh of Egypt and Assyria. Later Phoenician scarabs. Tharros scarabs. Kreoii tidas. 14 PHOENICIAN SCARABS [CHAP. I. markable as their graceful design. Fig. 13 shows one of the Fig. 13. Phoenician scarab of exceptionally delicate workmanship, dating probably from the 8th century B.C. The device consists of various sacred Egyp- tian and Assyrian symbols, arranged, without regard to meaning, simply as a decorative device. In the centre is the Egyptian god Horus seated on a lotus flower, between two winged cherubim of Assyrian style : at the top is the winged orb of the sun, the symbol of the sun-god Ra. One and a half times the real she. finest of these, with devices of Egyptian and Assyrian style arranged in a very decorative way, and most delicately worked in all its details. One of the finest collections, now in the British Museum (nos. 155 to 221), came from the cemetery of the Phoenician colony of Tharros in Sardinia, in most cases associated with objects which range in date from the 5th to the 3rd century B.C. It is however more than probable that in some cases the scarabs are much older than the date of the tomb in which they were buried. These later Phoenician scarabs frequently have, in addition to the earlier designs borrowed from Egypt and Assyria,- other subjects and forms of purely Greek origin ; the tide of influence having turned during the days of Phoenician de- cadence, with the result that Phoenician art was modified by that of the Greeks ; whereas some centuries earlier it was Greek art that received the influence of Phoenicia. Scarab of No. 4 in the Fitzwilliam collection is a specially interesting example of a scarab of this later type ; it was found in a Greek tomb in the island of Aegina, and is inscribed with the name of its owner Kreontidas ; see below, page 6"]. The design on it, the sacred beetle with outspread wings, is of purely Egyptian origin and the whole character of the scarab CHAP. I.] OF LATER STYLE. IS Guilloche border. closely resembles some examples which are certainly of Phoenician workmanship. It is however possible that it was Graeco- the work of a Greek engraver settled in the Hellenic trading ^f£'"'" city of Naukratis in the Delta of the Nile, where many objects of Greek workmanship but of Egyptian style have been found. Nothing is more difficult than to attain to any certainty either as to the date or the origin of works of art of this class. As is usually the case with the art of Oriental races, the same hieratic forms survive for many centuries without any serious alteration ; and even technical peculiarities and details of style remain unchanged for very long periods. In the later class of Phoenician scarab-gems the design is very frequently surrounded by a peculiar border usually called the " cable border," or in French the guilloche. This orna- ment evidently originated in a sort of plaited design, forming a series of circular loops, which is one of the commonest patterns used in the early sculpture, painting and jewellery of Mycenae and other primitive Hellenic sites. It survived in Greek art on painted vases, and as a sculptured decoration for buildings, throughout the whole period of Greek autonomy. Both as a painted and as a carved pattern it occurs very frequently among the architectural fragments of pre-Persian date, which have been recently discovered on the Acropolis of Athens. In most cases, when used as a border for scarabs or scarabaeoids, the pattern has lost its curved lines, and has degenerated into a band with a succession of straight or sloping cross strokes, mainly owing to the technical difficulty of cutting a curved as compared with a straight line on a hard stone or jewel \ A similar guilloche border occurs on the large thin di- drachms of Metapontum, Sybaris and other cities of Magna Graecia during the 6th century B.C., those, that is, which have an incuse design on the reverse. Among the Sardinian scarabs found at Tharros and others of that type a great many have been found in their original ^ Owing to its frequent occurrence on the scarabs found in the tombs of Etruria, this guilloche pattern was once commonly called the "Etruscan border; " it is not however a design of Etruscan origin. Borders on coins. i6 LATE PHOENICIAN GEMS. [CHAP. I. Mounted scarahs. Collections of scarabs. mounts ; this is usually a simple gold swivel-ring, which allows the scarab to revolve on the wire which passes through the longitudinal perforation. In some cases the scarab itself is fixed in a gold mount or border of very delicate workman- ship, which, of course, revolves with it. In the 6th and sth centuries B.C. and even later, signets of cylinder form, usually in magnetite, crystal, or chalcedony, were made by the Phoenicians, and engraved with figures of Assyrian style. Later still, during the extreme decadence of Phoenician art in the 4th and 3rd centuries B.C., signet-gems of conical form, pierced for suspension through the smaller end of the cone, were commonly used. The device engraved on the base of these cones is usually of the rudest and coarsest workmanship, a remarkable contrast to the very beautiful engraved scarabs made by the Phoeni- cians some centuries earlier. With regard to collections of Phoenician gems, those in the British Museum and in the Ashmolean Museum have been already mentioned. A very fine collection of scarab gems from tombs in Phoenicia and Syria was made by the Due de Luynes, and was presented by him to the Biblio- th^que Nationale of Paris. Many Phoenician gems are illustrated by Perrot and Chipiez, History of Art in Phoenicia, 1885 (translation), Vol. II. p. 227 — 260: see also Cesnola, Cyprus, i^Tj, PL xxxi — XLI; De Vogues Melanges d' ArcUologie Orientate has been already referred to. A good description of Oriental cylinders and cones is given by Perrot and Chipiez, IIist07y 0/ Art in Chaldaea and Assyria, 1884 (translation). Vol. II., pages 251 to 280. In the main the literature of this subject is scattered through the pages of many different archaeological period- icals, chiefly published in Germany and France. 17 CHAPTER II. Grb:ek Gems. Among the earliest signets found on Hellenic soil, though Gold clearly not of Greek workmanship, are the massive gold rings "•f"^'-'- found in the tombs of Mycenae, which have figures of Oriental or Egyptian type deeply cut on the broad gold bezel of the ring. The date of these is certainly not later than the I2th century B.C., and may possibly be earlier. As they are cut on metal, not on hard stones, they do not (strictly speaking) come under the class of gems. In style they are very different from the gems which were found with them, and it is most probable that these gold signets were not the productions of native artists, but were Oriental imports. They are re- markable for the great size of the gold bezel, and for the complicated and pictorial character of their devices, very unlike the simplicity of early Greek gems. On one is cut a hunting scene of very Assyrian character ; Rings two men in a two-horse chariot pursue a stag, at which one of Mycenae. the hunters is aiming an arrow. Another of these rings has a battle scene, in which the figures resemble those on the elabo- rate bronze daggers inlaid with gold from the same tombs within the Acropolis of Mycenae. A third is quite different in style, being more like mediaeval or modern Hindoo work than the production of any classical country. The subject is this — a female deity in Oriental costume is seated under a tree ; two women and a girl present flowers to her. The field is filled up with various scattered devices. The whole is bad in drawing, and weak and spiritless in design — very M. 2 i8 MYCENAE SIGNETS [chap. II. Mycenae ^^eiiis. Forms of Island Zenis. Plate I. Pebble gems. unlike the vigour of the figures of Assyrian style on other works of art from Mycenae. Though sunk on a gold bezel, the design is sharply cut with gem-engravers' tools, exactly as if the work had been on a hard stone, instead of on soft, unalloyed gold. In addition to these gold signets, a considerable number of engraved gems were found at Mycenae. These were of the class described in the following section, namely, gems of lenticular form, cut on various hard stones and crystal. Recent discoveries in Egypt have shown that pottery of exactly similar type to that found at Mycenae was imported into Egypt about 1400 B.C. ; this is a valuable piece of evidence with regard to the probable date of the gems and other objects found in the Acropolis of Mycenae. " Island gems : " examples of the earliest class of engraved gems of Greek workmanship have been found in great numbers, within recent years, on many early Hellenic sites, and more especially in the islands of the Aegean Sea, hence their usual designation of " Island gems." Their chief peculiarity is that they are engraved on rounded pebble-like stones, mostly shaped like a circular bean [lenticula], and hence called " lenticular gems ; " less frequently they are of oblong form, like a bluntly pointed oval. Stones of this form are usually called " glandular gems " from their resemblance to the ordinary lead sling-bullets {glandes). These two forms appear to be referred to by Pliny {Hist. Nat. XXXVII., 196) when writing of the favourite shapes for gems, engraved or plain, " Figura oblonga maxime probatur, deinde quae vocatur lenticular Nos. i and 2 in the Fitzwilliam catalogue are examples of the glandular form, with characteristic animal devices; see also fig. 14 from a glandular gem in the British Museum. They are always pierced with a hole drilled longitudinally through them, but in many cases they are too large to be set in swivel-rings, like the scarabs, and were probably worn by a string round the neck. These shapes seem often to have come naturally from the form of the nodule of chalcedony or the water-worn pebble, which was polished, and had the signet device engraved on it, CHAP. II.] AND " ISLAND GEMS." I9 with very little cutting away of its natural surface. This is suggested by a common Greek word used for engraved gems, ■\frrjpa'ylSo'i epxei t^S' eTrov fiaOi^aerai'^. Compare also Euripides, /p/i. Aul. 155. Plautus, in his Pseudolus, mentions how the Macedonian soldier Harpax, when buying a slave-girl, deposited with the first instalment of money an impression of his signet (symbo- lum), as a pledge for the completion of the bargain. And again when he forwarded the rest of the money he sent a letter with another seal from his signet to testify that he was concluding the transaction; see Pseud. 11. ii. 53 and iv. ii. 44. Among the later Greeks and also among the Romans it was not unusual for the writer of a letter to state at the end of it what device it was sealed with, as a security against the letter being opened and re-sealed. ' On this use of the word iriy/ia for a signet device see the inscription on a scarab given at page 67. CHAP. II.] SIGNET AND TALISMANIC GEMS. 23 Letter to Trajan. Pliny^s signet. An example of this is quoted in the Appendix, Catalogue of Fitzwilliam Gems, no. 2 p. iii. In one of the letters to the Emperor Trajan written from Nicomedeia by Pliny the younger while he was Propraetor of the province of Pontica, 103 to 104 A.D., we have another instance of this precaution. Pliny states that he delays sending to Rome a certain prisoner named Callidromus in the hope that a gem may be found which, the prisoner asserted, had been stolen from him. The gem was engraved with a portrait in royal robes of its former owner, Pacorus, king of Parthia, whose slave Callidromus had been. Pliny concludes by saying that he sends with the letter a nugget of ore, said to have come from a mine in Pai'thia, and that the packet is sealed with his own signet, the device on which was a quadriga : see Pliny, Epis. X., 74 (16). The talismanic rings, with devices of magical curative or protective power, which the Romans were so fond of, were not so largely used among the less superstitious Greeks ; but such things were not unknown. Aristophanes {Plut. 883) alludes to signets which were a safeguard against poisonous reptiles, when he mentions the Just man's ring, which would protect him against the venom of the public informer — ^OKaiof. OvBev irpoTi/MW aov ipopw jdp 7rpia,fj,evo<; Tov SaKTvXiov TovBl Trap" EvSa/ttoi/ Spa^^rj^. Again in a fragment of a play by Antiphanes (quoted by Athenaeus, Deipn. III. 96 (123)) the miser says Eai/ 8' apa ^rpe^Tj fie Trepl rrjv IAIZTIQN or, with EPrON understood, <1>IAIITI0N02:. No. 356 in the same collection, with Heracles and the Nemean lion, repro- duces a coin-reverse of Heraklaea, also in Lucania ; and No. 443 has the man-headed bull crowned by a Victory, Engravers of coins and gems. Signed coins. Gem-like coins. Coin 'types on sterns. 30 COMPARISON OF COINS AND GEMS. [CHAP. II. which occurs on the well-known didrachms of Neapolis (the modern Naples). The same connection between gems and Fig. 1 8. Very fine work of the 5th century B.C. : one and a half times the real size. Cf. the description of gem No. 7 in the Fitzwilliam Catalogue. Copies of coins. Gems objects of hixtiry. Coins of Sicily. coins is illustrated by a paste cameo in the British Museum, No. 646, which, as Mr A. H. Smith points out in his cata- logue, p. 97, is moulded from a tetradrachm of Syracuse with the front face of Athene; see Brit. Mus. Cat. of Coins of Syracuse, No. 199 : this is the coin mentioned above as having the signature of the die-engraver Eukleidas. The usual superiority of the coins, as compared with the gems of Greece proper, during the best period of Greek art, may possibly be due to the fact that the coins were intended for public use, while the gems were objects of private luxury. So in the case of architecture, painting and sculpture, we find that all the chief efforts of the greatest artists were devoted, during the great period of Athenian supremacy, to the service of the State, not of private individuals. In Magna Graecia and Sicily, on the other hand, personal pomp and luxury were developed at an earlier time ; and this may 'explain the frequently superior quality of the gems of those countries. It should also be observed that the art-development of the Sicilian and Italian colonies was many years in advance of that in the mother country. The magnificent Syracusan decadrachms of Kimon and Euainetos, executed several years before the close of the 5th century B.C., are in style quite as advanced as the work of the artists of Attica fully half a century later. CHAP. II.] SIGNETS OF GOLD. 31 The soft beauty and richly decorative treatment of the noble heads of Persephone and Arethusa on the obverses of these coins, and the almost realistic treatment of the victorious quadriga on the reverse, do not at all accord with the usual notions of Greek art before 400 B.C. A very magnificent kind of signet was also much used in Magna Graecia during the 4th century B.C. — a massive ring with a large flat bezel, all of gold, engraved like a gem with designs of great beauty. A splendid example in the British Museum has, engraved in the gold, a copy of the quadriga on the silver decadrachms of Syracuse. Examples of these gold signets signed with the artist's name are mentioned below, see page 73. The gem-room of the British Museum also contains two extremely beautiful engraved signet-rings of gold, from tombs in Magna Graecia (Castellani Collection). One of these has a bezel of pointed oval form, on which is cut a very beautiful female head of about 400 B.C. Another has a figure of a youth on horseback, riding at full speed, a marvel of spirited design and minute workmanship, cut with as much sharpness of touch as if the material had been a hard stone instead of soft, pure gold. According to Pliny {Hist. Nat. XXXII. 23) the use of signet-rings made wholly of gold originated in Samothrace. He says that they were not uncommon among the Romans of his own time, but his statement that they were first used in the reign of Claudius is obviously incorrect. In fact rings wholly of gold are among the earliest known examples of signets ; as, for example, the ring of " Cheops (Chufu)," who built the great pyramid, dating about 3730 B.C., and those found in the tombs of Mycenae, described at page 17. The lists cut every five years on marble stelae, as inven- tories of the sacred treasure of Athene, which was preserved in the Parthenon at Athens, give some interesting examples of gifts of gems, rings and other jewellery about the time of the Peloponnesian war. The wife of an Athenian called Kimon and a lady named Dexilla dedicated many articles of jewellery ; among them Gold signets. Engraving on £[old. Gold signet of Cheops. Parthenon treasure. 32 PARTHENON TREASURE. [CHAP. II. Votive gifts. Gems and rings. Votive gem. were various gold and plated rings set with onyx, jasper and coloured paste. The inscription runs thus — 'E7 Ki^aTia TTOiiciXw, o KXetTft) 'Api(TTO...iov, Klficovo'i v, cTcf)payl<; 'iacrTTK ■)(^pverovv SuktuKiov k)(ov(Ta, acppayi,'; taa-TTi,'; 7repLKe^pvaa)/ji,evT], a(j}paylpaylBe<; vdXivai p||, o-^pa^t? irepL'y^pvao'i, K.T.X.' "In a many-coloured (enamelled.'') casket, Kleito the daughter of Aristo..., the wife of Kimon dedicated (the following) ... A seal-ring of gold,...Dexilla dedicated... two signets with paste gems of various colours [probably imitations of onyx], an engraved onyx set in a gold ring, an engraved jasper in a gold ring, an engraved jasper set in gold [or set in metal plated with gold], an engraved gem made of paste set in gold and mounted in a gold ring, two signets in silver rings [probably the device was cut on a silver bezel], seven engraved gems of paste, a signet plated with gold, &c." In similar lists of other years the following gems and rings occur — ovv^ p,eya<; TpayeXdep86vTj, Latin funda, was given to that part of the ring which borders the gem, on account of its resemblance to the stone in a sling : see Eur. Hippol. 876, and Pliny, Hist. Nat. XXXVII. 116 and 126. The gem itself is ■>5fy]^o';, haKTvKiKT) ■xjrTJcfjo';, av or Temple-wardens for safe keeping on the Acropolis of Athens, most probably in the treasure-chamber of the Parthenon. For the sake of security each urn was sealed both by the Prytanes and by the Choregi — aecrrjfiaa-fiivai, fxev rja-av virb Twv irpvTavecov, KaTeacppayiafievai S' viro twv ■)(pp7)- can be dated about the year 300 B.C. owing to its having been found in the great peperino sarcophagus (now in the Vatican) of Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus who was consul in 298 B.C. This is a gold ring set with a sard on which is cut, in a dry, wiry manner, a standing figure of Victory, winged and holding a palm-branch. The same figure treated in a similar way occurs on a very large number of Roman gems : No. 31 Plate II. in the Fitzwilliam collection, engraved on chalcedony, is a good typical example of the design, and of the style of the early Roman gem-engravers generally. 1 This historical ring was Inherited, with the rest of Lord Beverley's gems, by Mr Heber Percy, and has since been purchased by the Duke of Northumberland ; it is preserved, with the rest of the Percy collection, at Alnwick Castle. 48 SUBJECTS ENGRAVED [chap. IV. Deities on gems. Plate II. Greek types. Latin deities. Portrait gems. The most frequently recurring subjects on Roman gems of this class are figures of Jupiter enthroned (see Nos. 26 and 27, Fitzwilliam catalogue) Minerva, Juno and other deities such as the Dioscuri, who were specially worshipped in Rome and are represented on the earliest of the Roman denarii'. Another very favourite subject is the goddess Roma, en- throned — a type which was adapted from certain Greek representations of Athene, as, for example, that on the tetradrachms of Lysimachus with the head of the deified Alexander on the obverse. Most of the Roman deities are represented in forms taken from Greek art — Jupiter, Juno and Minerva, the great triad of early Latin worship, have the dress and the symbols of Zeus, Hera and Athene : and it only rarely happens that any deities are represented in a more native and un-Hellenic fashion. One of these exceptional cases of a native Italian deity, who sometimes occurs upon gems and coins of the Republican period", is Juno Sospita with a serpent by her side, wearing a head-dress made of goat's skin — the special cultus-deity of Lanuvium. Under the Roman empire, gems of all kinds, cut on a great variety of stones, and with every degree of excellence of workmanship, were extremely common. Apart from the Graeco-Roman gems, which had little or nothing about them that was really Roman, the finest class is on the whole that with portrait heads either of the Emperor or some member of the Imperial family, or else that of the private owner of the gem ; a large number of this latter class must have been engraved for wealthy Romans, judging from the frequent occurrence of well executed portraits, which cannot now be identified. Even these portraits of Romans are in many cases evidently the work of Greek artists, as their noble and refined treatment clearly shows. "■ No. 33, with a standing figure of Minerva, and No. 49, with a bust of Victory, both in the FitzwilUam collection, are good examples of Roman gems of the Republican period ; they are illustrated on Plate II. ^ For example the head of Juno Sospita or Sispita is a common obverse type on denarii struck by monetarii of the Papia and Roscia families. CHAP. IV.] ON ROMAN GEMS. 49 One of the finest that now exists is the portrait of Julia, Titus' daughter, by the engraver Euodos ; see below, page 74. Among the recently acquired Carlisle gems in the British Museum there is a magnificent intaglio on chalcedony with the portrait head of an elderly, close-shaven Roman, with closely cropped hair, somewhat similar in style to the so-called head of Sextus Pompey, signed by Agathopous, in the Florentine collection. This wonderful example of iconic art, though noble and dignified in style, is treated with much minuteness of detail and vivid realism. Even a pimple on the chin is represented ; suggesting that the sturdy Roman, whose portrait the gem shows us, had similar views to those held by Oliver Cromwell with regard to the desirability of realistic truth in portraiture. The Carlisle gem, like all the finest Roman portraits, is thoroughly Greek in style, and is probably the work of a Greek engraver of the first century B.C. It may however be earlier than that, as the work both in design and execution is quite equal to the finest portrait heads on the coins of the Seleucid and Attalid Kings struck between about 300 and 150 B.C. In addition to the Roman taste for gems simply as works of art, their old importance as signets still survived. Pliny records {Hist. Nat. xxxvii. to) that the Emperor Augustus used for his signet the figure of a Sphinx ; mainly on account of the accident of his having inherited from his mother two exactly similar gems with this device. Thus when Augustus was abroad he could intrust the duplicate signet to his friends, and so give them authority to issue any necessary edicts in the Emperor's name. The Sphinx, cut in a very gem-like manner, occurs on the reverse of a silver coin of the cistophorus standard struck in Asia by Augustus ; and this coin very probably shows us what his signet-gem was like. The British Museum possesses a fine gem with the Sphinx device (No. 476 in the Catalogue), which seems to have been derived from the early coins of Chios. After a time, owing, Pliny says {Hist. Nat. XXXVII. 10), to jokes made on the Sphinx-like obscurity of Augustus' edicts sealed with the Sphinx signet, the Emperor changed the device of his seal, M. 4 Carlisle portrait gem. Gems as si^iets. Sphinx of Augustus. so THE SIGNET-RINGS [CHAP. IV. Imperial sifmets. Frog Pliny on rings. Jtis annuli and used instead a head of Alexander the Great, probably a contemporary portrait by the famous Pyrgoteles. Suetonius {Aug. 50) says that Augustus used, at different times, three different signets, first the Sphinx, secondly the head of Alexander, and lastly his own portrait engraved by Dioscorides. This last signet was used after the death of Augustus by subsequent Emperors, down to the time of Pliny's writing his Historia Naturalis, with the one excep- tion of Galba, who preferred to seal with his own signet, on which was cut his family device — a dog standing on the prow of a ship ; see Dio Cass. Li. 3. Maecenas used as his official seal a gem engraved with a frog, a device which was, as Pliny says, well known and much dreaded on account of its association with edicts for the imposition of taxes. This device of a frog occurs on more than one of the scarabs which have been found in Etruscan tombs. A good example is in the British Museum, No. 474. A very interesting account of Roman signet-rings' is given by Pliny {Hist. Nat. XXXIII. 8 to 36). He repeats the legend about the earliest ring being that which Prometheus wore after his liberation by Zeus, with a bit of the rock to which he had been chained, set in a ring made of iron from his fetters, thus saving Zeus from perjury, who had sworn that Pro- metheus should remain for ever bound upon Mt Caucasus; see Catull. LXIV. 295—298. In early times (Pliny thinks) rings were but little worn by the Romans ; among the statues of the kings on the Capitoline Hill, those of Numa and Servius Tullius were the only ones which had rings. The right of wearing gold rings was very sparingly granted : at first only to Ambassadors while abroad on state affairs, to whom a gold signet was given at the public expense ; on his return to Rome the Ambassador surrendered his gold signet and again wore the usual iron ring of a Roman citizen. By degrees i\iejus anmili aurei was granted to one official 1 On ancient rings, see the very learned treatise by Kirclimann, De Amclis, Sleswick, 1657. CHAP. IV.] OF THE ROMANS. 51 after another; Senators and Consuls being the first to enjoy the privilege. It then became the mark of the Equestrian Order', and finally, under the later Roman Empire, the gold ring became the mark of any man of free birth, a silver ring being the badge of a freedman, and an iron ring that of a slave. Pliny remarks {Hist. Nat. xxxni. 23) that in his time the iron rings of slaves were sometimes plated with gold, " ferrum auro cingunt " : a form of signet of which a good many examples have been found, owing to the protection against rust which is afforded by the gold : otherwise iron rings have usually perished from oxydization^ With regard to the Roman names for rings, in addition to annulus, Pliny says (Hist. Nat. XXXIII. 10) that the SaKTvXio'i of the Greeks was called in Old Latin ungulus, and in later times symbolum ; the latter word {avfi^oXov) referring more strictly to the device on the signet : see Plant. Pseud. II. ii. 5 3 and IV. ii. 44. Another early Latin word was condalitim, from k6vBvXo<; meaning the same as SuktiiXio'; ; see Plautus, Trimcmmus, IV. 3, 7, where the word is not used as meaning specially a slave's ring, since it was probably his master's ring that the slave in the Play lost. A Comedy of Plautus entitled Condalium was so named in imitation of Menander's Drama called AaKTvXio'i. The clay or wax impression from the signet was called sigillum as well as symboluin: e.g. Cicero (Acad. II. 26, 85) uses the phrase "sigilla annulo imprimere." The word signare is used for the act of sealing, e.g. Ovid, Metam. IX. 566, " Protinus impressa signat sua crimina gemma." Many ancient gold rings, both Greek and Roman, are made thin and hollow, so as to make the most show at the least cost : they are unfortunately very liable to be crushed. This is the kind of ring which the Roman Flamen Dialis ' Hence the modius of gold rings sent to Carthage by Hannibal after the battle of Cannae, in 216 B.C., or according to other writers three modii ; see Livy, XXIII. Ii. " The use of iron without any gem for betrothal rings still survived in Pliny's time; Hist. Nat. xxxiii. 12. 4—2 Rings as marks of rank. Plated rings. Names for rings. Impres- sions of sintets. H0II01.V rings. 52 HOLLOW RINGS. [CHAP. IV. The Flamen's ring. Poison rin^s. Theft of gold. Heavy gold rings. Subjects on ^enis. was obliged to wear, in accordance with the curious and mysterious list of restrictions and duties which are recorded by the celebrated mural painter and historian of Republican Rome, Fabius Pictor (quoted by Aul. Gellius X. 15, § 5). He says — " Item annulo uti, nisi pervio cassoque, fas non est." These light rings of beaten, not cast gold are mentioned by Ovid (A. A. in. 221)— "Annulus ut fiat primo colliditur aurum." The cavity in the ring was sometimes filled with poison, so that the wearer could at any moment commit suicide : a method adopted by Hannibal (Juv. Sat. x. 164), " Cannarum vindex et tanti sanguinis ultor Annulus.'' In calling the ring "Cannarum vindex" Juvenal is pro- bably alluding to the modius of gold rings, which Hannibal collected from the slain equites at Cannae. Pliny records {Hist. Nat. XXXIII. 14 and 15) that the guardian {aedituus) of the Temple of Capitoline Jupiter killed himself with his poison-ring, to avoid being tortured, when the public store of gold, 2000 pounds in weight, was stolen from its secret depository inside the throne of Jupiter. This hap- pened during the third consulship of Cn. Pompeius Magnus, whose colleague M. Licinius Crassus is supposed to have been the robber. See also Hist. Nat. XXXIII. 25, where Demosthenes is said to have killed himself with a similar ring. In the same passage Pliny says that some people preferred to have a valuable gem set in a light, hollow ring, so that it might be less liable to injury from a chance fall. Others, whose wealth was of recent date, prided them- selves on the massive gold of their rings. Martial (xi. 47) ridicules an upstart, who wore on his finger a sardonyx set in a ring which contained a pound weight of gold ; cf Mart. XIV. 123. As a rule subjects from contemporary history were seldom used for Roman gems, even during the later Republican period, when such subjects were common on the reverses of CHAP. IV.] SIGNET DEVICES OF THE EMPIRE. S3 Pompey's signet. the denarii. Pliny, however, tells us {Hist. Nat. XXXVII. 8) SuiUs that Sulla used as his signet a gem engraved with the ^'-S'"^^- surrender in io6 B.C. of the Numidian King Jugurtha. Sulla also, according to Dion Cassius, used a gem with three trophies in allusion to his triple victories : this device also occurs on the reverse of one of his denarii. The same signet device of three trophies was cut on the ring of Pompey the Great, which Julius Caesar showed to the incredulous Roman Senate as a proof of Pompey's defeat and death; see Dion Cass. XLII. i8. Another design, according to Plutarch, was sometimes used by Pompey, namely a lion holding a sword (Xe'tui/ ^i'4'VPV'i)- It is interesting to note that the reverse of a rare gold coin struck by Marc Antony about 39 B.C. bears the same subject — a lion holding in its upraised paw a short sword or dagger, possibly copied from the famous signet of Pompeius Magnus', who was one of the earliest Roman collectors of engraved gems. The Roman Emperors seem to have had special curators of their gem cabinets. In the Columbarium of the Imperial freedmen, outside the Porta Capena, a sepulchral inscription was found over the ashes of "Julius Philargyrus libertus a dactyliotheca Caesaris.'' Another official was the keeper of the Imperial Signet, custus annuli, an office which was held in the time of J. Caesar by the father of Trogus Pompeius (Justin, XLIII. 5): "annuli curam habuisse" is the phrase used by Trogus. According to Capitolinus, the whole collection of gems formed by Hadrian was sold by Marcus Aurelius, together with other valuable works of art, by public auction in the Forum of Trajan, to pay the expenses of the war with the Marcomanni. One of the most interesting collections of ancient rings is that formed by the celebrated naturalist Waterton, the greater part of which is now in the South Kensington Museum. Among them are some magnificent examples of signets with ' This curious coin is illustrated by Stevenson, Dictionary of Roman Coins, London, 1889, p. 58. Curators of gems. Keeper of the Seal. Inipe7 ial collections. S. Kens. Mus. 54 RINGS AND GEMS [CHAP. IV. Waterton rings. Variety of materials. gems. the bezel in gold, engraved with fine designs of Egyptian, Greek and Etruscan workmanship. The following are among the most remarkable ; a large Egyptian gold ring of Ptolemaic date, which has a vesica- shaped bezel with a minutely cut, seated figure of Isis suckling the infant Horus. A Greek ring of the finest period of art, 5th century B.C., all of gold, has a very beautiful female head with no dis- tinguishing attribute — possibly representing Hera, most ex- quisitely cut on the gold bezel. Another Greek ring of c. 400 B.C., which is wholly of bronze, is remarkable for its fine patina and perfect state of preservation. On the bezel is cut a seated female figure with most gracefully designed drapery. Among the Roman rings are examples in a great variety of materials, gold, silver, bronze, lead, iron, amber, stone, such as rock crystal or chalcedony, glass, ivory and even enamelled pottery. One curious ring is cut out of a piece of amber ; in it is fixed a fine yellow paste intaglio with a head of Jupiter Ammon. In many cases the bronze and iron rings have their gem backed with bright metallic foil, in order that the dark metal might not diminish the brilliance of the stone : cf Pliny, Hist. Nat. XXXVII. 106. Several of the rings are of very small size, being intended only to reach to the first joint of the finger : such rings have often wrongly been taken for the rings of children. It is unfortunately very rare to find a really fine gem in its original setting, most ancient rings which now exist have engraved gems of rather poor design and workmanship. Under the Empire, as the old restrictions with regard to wearing rings gradually passed away, an enormous quantity of cheap gems seem to have been engraved. Among the commonest subjects are single figures of the various deified abstractions, which the Romans invented very freely, and also adapted from the Greeks. Figures of Sahts with her serpent, Fortuna with cornu- copiae and rudder, Abundantia, Indulgentia, Felicitas, Bonus CHAP. IV.] OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. 55 Eventus and many others are constantly repeated on the Roman inferior Roman gems, in exactly the same forms as on the reverses of the Imperial denarii and aurei. The older deities, such as Jupiter, Juno, Minerva, Roma and others are no less common, and have the same close relation to the reverse types of coins. Another favourite Roman device for signet-gems is some GrylH. form of what is usually called a gryllus, a composite monster made up with much ingenuity by joining together masks and various animals : see No. 90 in the Fitzwilliam Catalogue. According to Pliny {Hist. Nat. XXXV. 114) the famous Autiphilos. Graeco-Egyptian painter Antiphilos, who executed a number of fine pictures which were brought to Rome to adorn the Por- tions of Philip and that of Pompey in the Campus Martius, also painted a ludicrous figure known as the Gryllus. Hence, Pliny says, the name grylli was given to pictures of that comic class. The word also means a grasshopper or a cricket. It is still used in modern Italian for fanciful and grotesque figures. In the first century A.D., Pliny says (^Hist. Nat. XXXIII. 41), the fashion came in to Rome of wearing gems engraved with a figure of Harpocrates or some other Egyptian deity. Among the many new sects which flourished under the Roman Empire, that of the worship of Isis and Serapis was the most popular ; and even as early as the time of Augustus it was an important cult in Rome. A large number of Romano-Egyptian gems now exist : see Nos. 104 and 105 in the Fitzwilliam Catalogue. Figures of Horus or Harpocrates, the god of Silence, of which No. 20 in the same collection is a good example, were much used for signets, probably as a hint for discretion and silence with regard to the contents of the letter or other document that it was used to seal'. Astrological gems, engraved with a lucky horoscope, were also very largely used under the Roman Empire, when super- stitions of all kinds were specially rife. In the second and third centuries A.D. Mithraic and Gnostic ^ A mediaeval analogy is the common type of seal engraved with the words "lecta lege: tecta lege." Egyptian deities. Plates I. and II. Astrologi- cal gems. 56 ROMAN GEMS. [CHAP. IV. Talis- mans. Metallic amulets. Styles of gem engraving. Coins set in rinses. types were very common ; especially gems engraved with the mystic sun-god Abraxas and the Demiurgus Cnoubis : see No. 1 06, Fitz. Mits. Cat. These and many other devices were highly valued through- out the Imperial period as having talismanic or magical powers of protection and good luck ; — the power of the talisman depending partly on the device, partly on the stone it was cut upon, and lastly on the' season or planetary hour when the gem was engraved. Such gems were called by the Greeks TereXea-jjievoi or (papfiaKiTai, and amuleta by the Romans; see Pliny, Hist. Nat XXXVII. 118, In some cases metal signets of this class have a little dot or pin of gold or silver let into the field ; the union of two metals giving an additional talismanic virtue to the device. This may possibly have originated in the accidental discovery of the mysterious galvanic effect which is produced when two adjacent metals are touched by the tongue. This would naturally be noticed in those not uncommon rings which have the bezel made of one metal and the hoop of another. With regard to the style of Roman gems, the finest, both in intaglio and in cameo, were produced under Greek influence, if not by Greek artists, during the Augustan age. It is notice- able, as has been already remarked, that in many cases fine gems of the Roman Imperial period are engraved with copies of statues, whereas during the best Greek time the designs on gems were specially devised for glyptic purposes. During the Flavian period the work was, as a rule, inferior in style and coarser in execution'; but a few years later, in the time of Hadrian, there was a remarkable revival both of good taste and of technical skill, which came to a rather sudden end about the close of the second century A.D. in the reign of Septimius Severus. After that, the decadence of gem engraving, like that of the other arts, continued without intermission. Hence arose, in the third or fourth century, the not uncommon fashion of wearing in rings and other ornaments fine gold coins ' The portrait of Julia tlie daugliter of Titus by Euodos, in the Paris Biblio- theque, is a remarkable exception to this rule. CHAP. IV.] PERIOD OF DECADENCE. 57 Byzantind period. {aitrei) of the earlier Emperors, instead of a badly engraved Decadence. contemporary gem, a custom which was imitated by people of Celtic and Teutonic race in much later times. This however did not bring the engraving of gems to an end : the art still was largely practised, though the old skill was lost, both in technique and design. By the time of Constantine, at the beginning of the 4th century, gem engraving in Rome had, like all the other arts, sunk to its lowest ebb; and the craftsmen of Byzantium, skilful as they were in enamelling and working in the precious metals, seem not to have very largely developed the glyptic art, even during the wonderful outburst of technical skill and artistic excellence which took place in the time of Justinian, in the early part of the 6th century A.D. Christian gems of the Roman period are, as a rule, of very poor workmanship. The commonest subjects are Christ the good Shepherd, represented after the old pagan types of Hermes Psycho- pompos or Orpheus playing to the listening beasts — subjects which frequently occur among the early Catacomb paintings. The Christian monogram :5R, the dove and olive branch, and other symbols of this kind were very often cut on gems of the 4th and 5th century. A very fine Christian gem worked with exceptional delicacy has a standing figure of a winged Victory' holding a tall cross, a design copied from a not uncommon reverse on a gold solidus of Honorius, c. 412 A.D. This gem is in Dr Drury Fortnum's collection, one of the finest in the world for its Christian gems and rings'"'. Christian gems. Victory or an^el. ' It is interesting to note that the usual mediaeval representation of an angel appears to have been derived, through many stages, from the winged Victory of the Greeks. ^ Dr Fortnum has written at various times many valuable papers on the subject of Christian gems and rings, especially in the Archaeological Journal ; see Vol. XXVI. p. 137; xxviii. p. 266; XXIX. p. 305; XXXIII. p. Ill, and xlii. P' 159- 58 LATE PERSIAN GEMS. [CHAP. IV. Sasanian Dynasty. Origin of name. Materials andforjns of gems. Moslem gems. Sasanian Gems. During the lowest period of artistic decadence in Rome, a great many large but feebly cut gems were executed in Persia under the successors of the Achaemenidae, from the third century A.D. down to the Moslem conquest of Persia in 632. The finest of these have portrait busts of the King, frequently a Shapur or a Hormizd, or of the Queen, with name and titles in Pehlevi characters. The name Sasanian is derived from a man called Sasan, a supposed ancestor of Ardashir, the first king of this dynasty, who began to reign about 212 A.D. The Persian gems of this period are frequently large and decorative in style, though poor in the details of the design and coarsely cut. A great part of their beauty depends on the fact that usually they are cut on carnelian, rock crystal, amethyst or carbuncle of very fine and brilliant quality. In most cases the gems are convex, either in front or at the back. The conical and the scarabaeoid forms were used occasion- ally in Persia, even at this late period, especially when the material employed was chalcedony; No. 24 in the Fitzwilliam Catalogue is an example of this, as it is also of a favourite Sasanian class of subject — that of hunting scenes, the king on horseback attacking lions, boars, stags and other animals. Some large Sasanian intaglios are cut on unusual materials, such as turquoise and lapis lazuli. Both these magnificently coloured stones of very fine quality are largely found in Persia. Persian lapis lazuli is the finest in the world. In the year 632 A.D. the fanatical disciples of Mohammed conquered the degenerate successors of the warlike Achae- menidae, and thenceforth the signet-gems of the Persians have been mostly engraved with names or pious sentences, owing to the precept of the Koran which again introduced the old Mosaic law forbidding the likeness of any living thing to be represented. In later times the Persians adopted a modified form of the Moslem Faith, and, to a large extent, have ignored this prohibition — much to the horror of the orthodox Sunni sects. 59 CHAPTER V. Cameo Gems. In addition to the usual signet-gem with its device sunk Gems cut {intaglio di cava), there were, especially under the Roman ^'^'"■"J- Empire, a certain number of gems cut in relief, which were intended, not for impressing seals, but for use as ornaments. This is what is meant by the modern word cameo^, a name which is probably of Arabic origin. Such works in relief were included by the Greeks under the name -rviroi iyyeyXu- fievoi, and were called by the Romans ectypae — words, which, Ectypae. however, were applied to reliefs in metal and other materials as well as to cameo gems. Pliny {Hist. Nat. XXXVII. 173) describes certain stones as being especially suited for cameo cutting — "Gemmae quae ad ectypas scalpturas aptantur.'' One of the earliest examples of the mention of a ring-cameo by a classical author is in a passage of Seneca {De Beneficiis, III. 26), who speaks of a man wearing a cameo portrait of the Emperor — " Tiberii Caesaris imaginem ectypam atque eminente gemma.'' The oldest existing examples of cameos (not including Earliest Egyptian work) are some curious gems of the 6th century B.C., with a Gorgon's mask or other figure cut in very slight relief, frequently on the back of a scarab instead of the usual beetle form^ An example of this rare class of gems is mentioned below at page 88, as being signed by its engraver. ^ In mediaeval documents spelt also camahzttuvi^ chama/i, cainazit^ camahieu and in many other ways. ^ Two characteristic examples of early cameos are illustrated in the Journ. Hell. Stud. vol. VI. p. ■285: see also Brit. Mus. Cat. p. 58. cameos. 6o GREEK AND ROMAN [chap. V. Greek cameos. , Cameos in sard. Pkalerae cameos. Large cameos. Some very fine cameos of this kind were found in the tombs at Kertch, dating about 400 B.C. or rather earher : for example a gold swivel-ring with a scarab-shaped carnelian, but having the back cut in relief, into the form of a sleeping lion : the flat side has a running lion, in intaglio. Another similar scarabaeoid, with a lion cameo on the back, has on the reverse a trophy of arms : see Ant. du Bosph. Cimmerien au Musee de I'Ermitage, PI. XVII. Nos. 8 and 11. Another ring from a Kertch tomb is set with a cameo head of Athene cut in deep red carnelian. It was found on the skeleton hand of a lady who wore eight rings. These early cameos are mostly cut in sard, carnelian or some other stone of homogeneous colour, but the later cameos of Roman date are mostly cut on some stratified stone, such as the onyx or sardonyx, in order that the design might be cut in one stratum, and be set off by having its background of another colour. One of the most important classes among the Roman cameos are large, full-faced heads of Medusa or Jupiter, carved in a thick piece of onyx or sardonyx, and used to ornament the phalerae in the middle of the bronze cuirass of an emperor or general of an army. The Medusa's head was often inlaid in the aegis which formed a principal ornament on the Imperial cuirass. A very beautiful example of this was dredged up in the Tiber in Rome in 1886, and is now in the possession of Dr John Evans, P.S.A. ; see Proceed. Soc. Ant., vol. XI. 1887, p. 396. It is cut in bold relief on a very thick piece of onyx, which measures about 3^^ inches across. The British Museum possesses a very fine Gorgon's head cut in high relief in a brilliant amethyst, which was probably a similar ornament. A few Roman cameos exist of very great size, Some as much as from 10 to 12 inches square. The most famous are the "Coronation of Augustus'' at Vienna', and the "Apotheosis of Augustus" in the Paris Bibliotheque. Both are elaborate ' The Vienna collection is specially rich in Roman cameos of great size : a large circular cameo of an eagle is specially magnificent, measuring about 9 inches in diameter, and very noble in design. CHAP, v.] CAMEO GEMS. 6l compositions, with many figures in two or three tiers, evidently designed and executed by some very skilful Graeco-Roman artist. The Vienna cameo was bought by Rudolf II. for a sum equal to i^io,000 in modern money. The Apotheosis of Augustus was, according to a probably correct tradition, given to the Treasury of the Sainte Chapellc in Paris by Louis IX. shortly before the middle of the 13th century. In a Latin inventory of the precious objects in this treasury dated 1341 it is described thus: — "Item, Unum pulcherrimum camaut in cujus circuitu sunt plures reliquiae." In later inventories it is called "le grand camahieu de France." In 1343 Philip VI. lent it to the Pope, but in 1379 Charles V. restored it to the Sainte Chapelle. This magnificent cameo had been mounted in an elaborate frame of gold and ena- melled work of Byzantine style, containing cavities, closed with plates of rock-crystal, in which various relics were pre- served; but unfortunately this beautiful frame-work was lost in 1804, when a party of burglars broke into the Bibliotheque and carried off many of its most precious objects, including a priceless collection of large Roman medallions both in gold and silver. The cameo itself was recovered, but its setting and the other objects in the precious metals perished in the melting pot; see Revue ArcMo. V. 1848, p. 186. Another historical cameo in the Bibliotheque is the so- called "Apotheosis of Germanicus", with a figure crowned by a Victory and borne up to Heaven on the back of an eagle, the usual Roman way of representing the Apotheosis of an Emperor or Prince. This large sardonyx gem was for many centuries in the possession of the Abbey of Saint-Evre; but in 1684 the monks sold it to Louis XIV. for his collection of gems, which he was then transporting from Versailles to the Palace of the Louvre. The King gave the monks the enormous sum of 7,000 gold ecus for this cameo — equal in modern value to more than double the number of pounds sterling. Vienna cameo. ' ' Cameo of France-^'* Cameo of Germa- 62 GRAECO-ROMAN AND [chap. V. Cameo Jupiter. Cameo cup. Naples patera. A third cameo in the same collection in Paris also has considerable historical interest\ It was given to the Cathedral of Chartres in 1357 by King Charles V., as is recorded in one of the inscriptions on the gold enamelled frame which still surrounds the gem. This cameo, which is cut in sardonyx, has a standing figure of Jupiter holding a sceptre and thunder-bolt ; at his feet is an eagle, on account of which the cameo was venerated in mediaeval times as representing St John, the eagle being taken for the Evan- gelist's symbol. Till the Revolution in 1789 the cameo remained in the Cathedral treasury at Chartres. The so-called " cup of the Ptolemies " is also now in the Paris collection. This is a large two-handled cantharus, cut out of one immense nodule of sardonyx, and covered on the outside with cameo reliefs of various Dionysiac figures and symbols, of rich decorative effect, though not designed with very good taste. It is a purely Roman design of the first or second century A.D. This very remarkable cup was given in the 9th century by one of the Carlovingian Kings to the Abbey of St Denis, where it was occasionally used as a chalice at Mass. At the coronation of the Kings and Queens of France it was an ancient custom for the Queen to take the "housel- sip" of consecrated wine from this cup^ Like the "Apotheosis of Augustus," this cameo-encrusted cantharus was stolen in 1804, and then lost its elaborate gold foot, though the cup itself was restored to the Biblioth^que, when the burglars were arrested in Holland, whither they had escaped with the non-meltable portion of their spoil. On the whole the finest Graeco-Roman cameo in the world is in the form of a large circular patera of translucent agate, 8 inches in diameter, in the Museum of Naples. It has ' See Chabouillet, Cat . des camces et pierres gravies de la Bibliothiqiie Impc'riale, Paris, 1858, page i, no. 4. ^ Long after the consecrated wine was, as a rule, withheld from the laity, the sovereigns of France at their Coronation-Mass continued to receive the sacrament in both kinds, an interesting survival of very primitive times when the offices of King and Priest were held by the same man. CHAP, v.] ROMAN CAMEOS. 63 a cameo relief on both sides ; one is a magnificent head of Medusa, and on the reverse side is an allegorical subject representing the Nile as the source of the fertility of Egypt. Both in design and execution it is a work of remarkable beauty, far superior in treatment to the more famous cameos of Paris and Vienna. It has unfortunately been damaged by having a hole clumsily drilled through its centre ; otherwise it is perfect. The British Museum possesses a very noble portrait-bust of Augustus in profile (No. 1560) illustrated as frontispiece to Mr A. H. Smith's Catalogue. It is cut boldly, in a very good style, but without much minuteness of detail, in a sardonyx of three layers measuring 5 inches in height. On the breast an aegis is represented with central phalerae with the Medusa's head, like that in Dr Evans' collection. The most beautiful Roman cameos, which are usually of much smaller size, are portrait-heads of Emperors, Empresses and other members of the Imperial family. One of the finest in the British Museum is a profile bust of Julia, the daughter of Titus (No. 1607 Brit. Mus. Cat), ap- parently copied from the celebrated intaglio signed by Euodos. This cameo may, however, be the work of one of the very skilful gem-engravers of the last century. No. 43 in the Fitzwilliam Collection is a well designed, but somewhat coarsely cut bust of Juno in onyx, dating probably from the early period of the Roman Empire. A few gems exist, caprices of the Roman engravers, which combine intaglio and cameo ; as, for example, one in the British Museum from the Blacas collection (No. 1568) which has an intaglio portrait head of the Empress Livia in the character of Ceres, surrounded by a border with the symbols of the other chief deities cut in relief Besides the use of large cameo heads for the phalerae of Imperial armour, they were also made to ornament the massive fibula or brooch which fastened the Emperor's cloak {paludamentum) on one shoulder. They were also used in a lavish and often tasteless way for many other ornamental Cameo of the Nile. Head of Augustus. Cameo of jfuiia. Brooch cameos. 64 CAMEO ENGRAVING IN STONE AND PASTE. [CHAP. V. Cameos on armour. Method of cameo cutting. Cameos of glass. Final tooling. purposes by the purse-proud Romans. Tomb reliefs of the 3rd and 4th century A.D. sometimes show the cuirass studded with five or six big cameos ; as, for example, the monument of M. Caelius in the Museum at Bonn. A few of these large cameos have additional life and transparency given to certain parts of the relief by having a cavity cut out at the back, so as to partially reduce the thickness of the translucent gem. This is the case with the Medusa head in chalcedony in the Marlborottgh Collection, No. 100, one of the finest phalerae gems known. On the whole the Roman love for cameos cut out of stratified gems had a degrading influence on the glyptic art. It was rather a tricky sort of ingenuity that was fostered by the wish to have gems with the design worked out of three or four layers of different colours, the background being one colour, the flesh of the head another, the hair a third, and perhaps a wreath round the head in a fourth, the uppermost stratum. Great skill is often shown by the way in which the artist has designed his subject to suit the successive layers of varied colour, but he was usually seriously hampered by the exigencies of the thin strata ; and work of this elaborate kind has an awkward flatness of modelling, and necessarily a com- plete want of graceful modulation in passing from one plane to another of the relief However, cameos such as these are showy and highly decorative at a distance, and that is what Roman taste seems to have preferred in all branches of art. Paste cameos : remarkable skill was shown by the Roman glass-workers in their copies of large and elaborate onyx cameos, executed in pastes of different colours fused together so as to resemble the various strata of the onyx and sardonyx. The difficulty of securely fusing the relief in opaque white paste on to a ground of differently coloured glass must have been very great. The finest of these paste cameos have usually received, after the glass was cold, a good deal of finishing work, executed with the various tools which were used in cutting real onyx. Without these final touches the relief was liable to be blunt and spiritless in effect. A large number of cheap paste cameos, executed without CHAP, v.] CAMEOS IN PASTE. 6S any final tool-work, seem to have been made under the later Roman Empire, with glass of two or more colours to imitate the stratified gems such as onyx and sardonyx. Several antique examples of these paste cameos were used, about the year 1300, to decorate that magnificent painted and enamelled retable, which was made for the high altar of Westminster Abbey, and is still preserved in the south ambulatory of the choir. This mediaeval use of antique pastes and also of real stones was very common, especially for retables, reliquaries, and even rings. Many fine cameos {camahiitd), some of great size, were among the numerous antique gems which Henry III. used to decorate the magnificent gold shrine of Edward the Confessor, and many other gems were hung round the shrine as votive offerings. Almost every mediaeval shrine or reliquary of any im- portance was more or less enriched with antique gems, both in cameo and intaglio. One of the most important cameos in paste is in the Vienna collection — a fine head of Augustus in blue glass, with the signature of Herophilus the son of Dioskourides, incised on the fields The British Museum possesses a large fragment of a paste cameo (from the Townley collection) of quite a different class — not a copy of an engraved gem, but rather of the nature of a relief for mural decoration. This magnificent slab or tablet has in high relief a nude figure of a youth, representing Bonus Eventus, which must have been (when complete) seven or eight inches in height. It is Greek in style, modelled with great skill and taste, and is formed, not in a stratified material with differently coloured layers, but in fine blue paste, speckled to imitate lapis lazuli. It has first been formed in a mould, and has afterwards been worked with the ordinary gem-engraver's tools, exactly in the same way as if it had been a real piece of lapis lazuli. In beauty of colour and in excellence of finish it is quite as fine as if it were a real stone cameo. ' This cameo is described below at page 76. M. 5 Cameos on mediaeval shrines. West- minster Abbey. Cameo tablet. 66 CHAPTER VI. Inscriptions on Gems. I. The Owner's Name: Egyptian scarabs, Assyrian cylinders and a certain class of Phoenician gems very com- monly have on them the name of their owner, in the first case in hieroglyphs, in the second in cuneiform characters, and in the last in the early characters, prototypes of the Greek and Latin Alphabet, which were used in common by various Semitic races, such as the Jews, the Phoenicians and the Jewish people of Moab. One of the earliest of existing Semitic signet. inscriptions (shown on fig. 20) is the name Haggai ben Shebaniah, cut in two lines on a small gem found near Samaria by the Palestine Exploration Society. The date Fig. cjo. Signet of Semitic type, with no device except the owner's name in Phoenician or Hebrew characters of the earliest form, dating from a time when the same alphabet was used in common by the Jews, the Phoenicians and other neighbouring Semitic races. The cut is nearly double the real size. of this interesting signet is about the 9th or 8th century B.C. The owner was probably a Jew\ Many Phoenician gems 1 The description of Aaron's breast-plate in the Book oi Exodus (xxviii. 17 to 21), specially records that its gems were engraved with the name of each tribe "like the engravings of a signet," but these stones were, most probably, of Phoe- nician workmanship, as was the whole Temple of Solomon with all its decorations and fittings. CHAP. VI.] OWNERS' NAMES ON GEMS. 67 Owners^ names. Scarab of Semon. with the owner's name have been found in various far distant places : one was even discovered a few years ago on the south coast of Ireland. Owners' names rarely occur on Greek gems of the best period ; and the earliest Greek gems — those of lenticular form — date from before the introduction of writing among the Greeks, and therefore have no sort of inscription. An early example of a gem with the name of its Greek owner is No. 4 in the Fitzwilliam Catalogue, the agate scarab of Plate I. Phoenician type which is mentioned above at page 14 ; in the field is cut, in characters of the early part of the 5th century B.C., KPEONTIAA EMI, " I am the badge (or signet) of Kreontidas,'' the word (Tr]iia (or aippa/yh) being understood. In the Berlin Museum is a fine scarab in black jasper, with a kneeling figure of a nude girl holding a hydria under the jet of water which issues from the lion's head spout of a fountain. On it is cut the owner's name " Semon,'' ZHMONOZ, in characters of Ionian style. This very fine example of archaic work was found in the Troad : its date is probably a little earlier than the gem of Kreontidas, about the end of the 6th century B.C. ; see Jahrhtch Arch. Inst. 1888, p. 116, and Plate 3, No. 6. An earlier example of this class of inscriptions is on a very remarkable little scarab of the 6th century B.C. which is published in an interesting paper on early Greek gems by Rossbach, Archdol. Zeit. 1883, p. 311 seq. and Plate 16, No. 19. On the underside of the scarab is the following inscription, which occupies nearly the whole of the field, 0^P'^I05 ^Ml $AN\A M^ M^ A/^Oir^ for @epcri,ai<; elfiu craixa' /j^v fJ,e avoiye, " I am the device of Thersis ; do not open me." At the end of the inscription is the ' device ' — a very small dolphin. With these inscribed gems it is interesting to compare that very curious electrum stater probably struck by a Persian Satrap named Phanes, c. 600 B.C., with, on the obverse, a stag feeding and the legend in coarsely cut retrograde charac- ters ct^A/^HO^^ ^Ml 5BMA — meaning (according to Prof Gardner) " I am the device or badge of Phanes\" ' Professor Gardner is inclined to, attribute this remarkable stater to a Satrap 5—2 Scarab of Thersis. Stater of Phanes. 68 GEMS WITH NAMES OF OWNERS [CHAP. VI. Names on tombs. Plate I. Names on Roman gems. A similar phrase occurs on many Greek sepulchral inscrip- tions, as, for example, some found in Cyprus with the name of the dead person in the genitive followed by to crafxa r^ixl, written in the peculiar Cypriote syllabic characters : see your. Hell. Stud. Vol. XI., 1890, p. 67. On Greek gems of the 4th century B.C. and later the owner's name is rarely inscribed. The very fine 4th century scarabaeoid by Dexamenos (No. 11, Fitzwilliam Catalogue) bears the name Ml KHZ, possibly the name of the lady who owned the gem^; see above, page 28. On Roman gems both of the Republican and of the Imperial period owners' names are very common. Not unfrequently the Roman name is cut in Greek letters, as in the case of the celebrated Diomede with the Palladium by Felix., described below at page 75. The nominative and possessive cases are both used for the owner's name on Greek as well as on Roman gems. Except the gem of Thersis, which has the word (rayua, no word for ' gem ' or ' signet ' is added after the owner's name. A head of Athene on a sard in the Barberini collection in Rome has the inscription ATTOAAOAOTOY AI0O[S], "the of Halicarnassus (where the coin was found) named Phanes, who in 525 B.C. revolted against the Persian king Cambyses and joined the army of the Egyptian Ifing Amasis ; see Herod, in. 4. The form of the letters of the inscription is, however, clearly earlier in date than 525 B.C., and the type — a stag — would suggest that the coin was struck at Ephesus; see Head, Hist. Num., page 526. The only known example of this stater is in the British Museum. ' It is possible that this is a memorial gem, judging from the sepulchral cha- racter of its design, in which case Mike may be the name of the deceased lady who is represented on it. This unusual female name Mike or Mika occurs on a votive relief, now in the Central Museum of Athens, which represents the goddess Cybele, "the mother of the gods," seated in a throne. At the sides of the relief are small figures of a male and a female wor.shipper; and above them is the following dedicatory in- scription-MANHI A^HTPI | KAI AMKA MHTPI GEflN, cut in letters of about the middle of the fourth century B.C. or rather earlier; probably the same date, that is, as the lady represented on the scarabaeoid of Dexamenos in the Fitzwilliam Museum. The relief is illustrated by Miss Harrison in her valuable work, the Mythology and Myths of Athens, London, 1890, page 45. CHAP. VI.] AND OF GEM-ENGRAVERS. 69 gem of Apollodotos," but this gem is of very doubtful authenticity. In some cases, when the name is in very small characters, it is uncertain whether it is that of the engraver of the gem or of the owner : the latter is, as a rule, not only in larger letters than that of the artist, but is also placed in a more conspicuous position. 2. The Artist's Name. To decide which are genuine among the many so-called artists' signatures on ancient gems is a very difficult problem, and one which has been dis- cussed by various writers with very different conclusions. In the first place it will be well to consider what record we have in classical writers of the names of gem-engravers, {SaKrvXioyXixpo^ or XiOoyXvcfjo';, Lat. geminarum scalptor). The list is a short one. First comes the celebrated Theodorus of Samos, one of the most distinguished architects and sculptors in bronze and the precious metals of about the middle of the 6th century B.C., who is frequently mentioned as working in partnership with Rhoecus, or with Telecles, who were also Samians, and probably near blood-relations of Theodorus, though in what precise degree is very doubtful. Theodorus appears to have been specially skilful in metal work, and is mentioned as the inventor or improver of various processes in the manipulation both of bronze and iron : see Pausanias, viii. 14 § S ; x. 38 § 3 ; III. 12 § 8. According to Pliny {Hist. Nat. VII. 57), Theodorus was the inventor of various tools for working in wood, namely the norma (set-square), libella (level), tornus (lathe), and clavis (perhaps a vice) : all of which tools were certainly in use long before the time of Theodorus; see also Pliny, Hist. Nat. XXXV. 152'. As a gem-engraver the fame of Theodorus rests chiefly upon the celebrated engraved emerald, set in a gold ring {a(j}p)jyh %/3Lio-o8€T09), which was one of the most valued possessions of Polycrates, tyrant of Samos, who was crucified in 522 B.C. The whole story of the ring of Polycrates is told ^ Pliny's statements as to the inventors of processes in the arts must always be received with caution. In most cases they are obviously erroneous. Artisti names. Theodorus of Samos. Ring of Polycrates. ^o THEODORUS OF SAMOS [CHAP. VI. Scarab of Theodoriis. at length by Herodotus, III. 38 seq. ; and is mentioned by Pliny {Hist. Nat. xxxvil. 3 and 4) with reference to an uncut sardonyx in the Temple of Concord in Rome, which was popularly supposed to be the gem of this dramatic story : see above, page 35. In another place {Hist. Nat. XXXIV. 83) Pliny describes a bronze portrait statue by Theodorus of him- self, holding in one hand a file or scraper {lima) the symbol of his craft, and in the other " a quadriga and driver, so minute that they were covered by the wings of a fly.'' The real meaning of this impossible statement was pointed out by Dr Benndorf {Zeitschrift fiir Oesterreich. Gymnasien, 1873, p. 401 sq.), namely, that it was simply a scarab-gem engraved with a quadriga that the artist's statue held. Most of Pliny's information comes at second or third hand, and the blunder would easily be made'. This story, rightly read, tends to show that Theodorus regarded gem-engraving as an important branch of his art^, since he represented himself holding a scarab-gem, as a specimen of his skill. Most probably there was more than one distinguished Samian artist called Theodorus, so that the various inventions which are attributed to this name should be referred in part at least to an earlier Theodorus than the contemporary of Polycrates, possibly a grandfather of the later artist, as the common Greek custom was to name a son, not after his father, but after his grandfather — a very fruitful source of confusion in the literary records of artists. Another Samian gem-engraver of the first half of the 6th century, about whom almost nothing is known, was Mnesar- chus the father of the celebrated philosopher Pythagoras; see Herod. IV. 95; and Aristotle quoted by Diog. Laertius, VIII. i. The only gem-engravers mentioned by Pliny (see Hist. Pyrgoteles. Nat. XXXVII. 8) are these — Pyrgoteles, who worked for Alexander the Great, and was (according to the above passage) the only engraver who was allowed to cut the Mnesar- chus. 1 Pliny mentions i^Hist. Nat. xxxvi. 43) another Quadriga covered by a fiy's wings, the work of Myrmecides — possibly a similarly distorted statement. ^ The art of gem-engraving was called daKTu\ioy\vIAHM0N0C. Both Kohler and Stephani consider this a modern gem, not without reason : it is very pictorial in style. A paste in the Strozzi collection with the head of an ivy- wreathed Faun has the inscription *IAHMQN enOI[ei], but this also is of doubtful genuineness. Anteros ; another gem, about the authenticity of which Aniens. very different opinions have been expressed, is an aqua- marine in the Devonshire collection, with, in the exergue, the inscription ANJePGOTOC. The design represents Herakles staggering under the weight of the slain Marathonian bull. It is a very noble and beautiful work, certainly not of quite modern date, but most probably copied from some ancient terra cotta or marble relief by one of the ablest gem en- gravers of the 1 6th century. The same name occurs on the fragment of a very beautiful onyx cameo now in the British Museum, among the Carlisle collection. This fragment consists only of the upper part of a subject which may possibly have been the Judgment of Paris. Little more remains than the head of Paris wearing a Phrygian cap and holding a veil away from his face in a very feminine manner, and, on the other side, the head of a female figure. The top of the cameo is occupied by the overhang- ing branches of a tree, from which a quiver is suspended. At the right hand side is the inscription in minute incised letters ANTe...er... probably for ANTePQC enOIGI. The comparatively small portion which is, unfortunately, all that now exists of this remarkable cameo is of extraordi- narily beautiful and minute workmanship, and the signature appears to be perfectly genuine. Teukros ; of rather similar style, and possibly of the same Teuh-os. date as the Herakles and the bull, is an amethyst in the Florentine collection with Omphale (or lole) standing in front of Herakles who is seated on a rock. M. 6 Cameo by Anteros. 82 INSCRIBED GEMS [CHAP. VI. Teiikros. The name TGYKPOY is cut vertically in very minute characters, quite unlike the bold style in which an owner's name was usually engraved on a signet. A great many copies of this or a similar design exist. The sensuous softness of the modelling of the nude forms is more like the production of an artist of the Renaissance period than that of an ancient engraver, even of the late Greek or Graeco-Roman school. Though they can hardly be accepted as genuine, the two last mentioned gems are among the most skilful examples of the glyptic art that any age has ever produced. Moreover they are not slavish copies, but bear the impress of real original power on the part of their engravers. Aldus. Aulits ; probably no other artist's name, real or forged, occurs on gems as frequently as the name of Aulus. It is introduced on a large number of the Poniatowski forgeries, e.g. on one in the Fitzwilliam collection, see page xxv. No. 1 1. In many cases the name is clearly that of the owner, not of the engraver, as for example, on a magnificeht fragment of a sard in the British Museum with a head of Asklepios. In front of it, on a tablet, is the name AYAOY in large characters'. In fact, putting aside those gems on which the name is a forgery, and those on which it stands for the owner, it is very doubtful whether any would be left to prove that there was a gem-engraver named Aulus. Hellen. Hellen ; the name EAAHN or EAAHNOC occurs on various gems of doubtful authenticity. Mr King has suggested that this is one of the ways in which the celebrated gem-engraver // Greco. Alessandro Cesati, known as il Greco, used to sign his works. Alessandro was by birth a Cypriote and was one of the most famous gem-cutters of the i6th century; see below, page 127. It is also probable that the inscription AAEEANAPOC or, AAEZA more or less contracted are other forms of the same artist's signature. So also, perhaps, the name KOINTOZ AAEEA, Quintus Alexander. For example an onyx cameo in the Florentine museum ^ This is the view taken by Stephani ; Gesaiii. Schrift. ni. p. 342; butKohlerin his usual fashion rejects the gem altogether, quite without reason; see ib. p. lyg. CHAP. VI.] WITH artists' NAMES. 83 with a lion, Cupid and two female figures, signed AAEEANA . E, Cesati. is known to have been engraved by Cesati. It is probably the cameo mentioned by Vasari as one of Alessandro Cesati's finest works. In any case there is no real reason for including either of the last two names among those which can fairly be assumed to be signatures of artists. Epitynchanus ; this name, which occurs on several important EpUyn- .... . . , . , . chanus. gems, may possibly be a genume artist s signature, at least in some cases. Gems so inscribed are mostly portrait-heads, such as Marcellus and Germanicus. A very beautiful sard- onyx cameo in the British Museum with a head of a youthful Roman, supposed to be Germanicus (No. 1589), has the incised inscription 6TTITYrXA. No. 1575 in the same collection is a fine amethyst intaglio with a front face of a Roman lady, supposed to be Livia, the wife of Augustus, in the character of Ceres. In the field is the contracted name ETTIT. What is possibly the same name, contracted to ETTI, occurs on a fine carnelian in the Paris Biblioth^que, engraved with a figure of Bellerophon mounted on Pegasus. As possessing an artist's signature this gem is very doubtful, but the device itself appears to be genuine, and the gem had been known for a long time before 1854 when it passed into the Paris collection \ ^ See M. Hase's Edition of Leon Diacre, published in Paris in 1819. 6—2 84 CHAPTER VII. Inscriptions on Gems {continued). Signed cameos. Cameo of Athenion. Paste cameo. Cameos with artists' names : in judging of these, if the name, hke the rest of the design, is in relief we have the advantage of knowing that it must have been cut by the original engraver of the whole design, and cannot have been added by a later hand ; so we are at least spared the double difficulty of deciding, first whether the gem itself is genuine, and secondly whether the name may not be a subsequent addition by some forger. In many cases the signatures on cameos are not in relief, but are incised, like the name on an intaglio; all such signatures must be regarded with some suspicion. Among the most authentic signed cameos is a large sardonyx in the Museum at Naples, with Zeus holding a thunderbolt and driving a quadriga over the prostrate forms of the conquered earth-born Giants. In the exergue is the nameAGHNIQN in relief, in minute letters. The whole design is clearly the work of a talented artist of the Augustan period ; and even the sceptical Kohler throws no doubt -upon its genuineness. That the name Athenion is that of the engraver rather than of the owner of the cameo is suggested by the minuteness of the characters. Moreover an owner's name, which was a natural addition to an intaglio-signet, would certainly be a less frequent addition in the case of cameo gems. The same name (Athenion) occurs also on a large fragment of a cameo in bine paste in the Berlin col- lection, with a standing figure of a Roman General, supposed to be Drusus the elder, in a triumphal quadriga. The name CHAP. VII.] CAMEOS WITH ARTISTS' NAMES. 85 A0HNIQN, in exactly similar letters to those on the Naples .cameo, is placed in the exergue of the Berlin paste, which is, no doubt, an ancient copy of a work of the same engraver who cut the Destruction of the Titans by the thunderbolts of Zeus. In the Florentine collection there is a very good cameo in sardonyx with Cupid riding on a lion and playing a lyre. In the exergue is the signature in relief flPQTAPXOl ETTOEI, which even Kohler admits to be genuine, placing it among the five examples of signed gems which are the only ones he accepts as ancient gem signatures. Another very fine signed cameo was in the collection of Lord Beverley, and is now in the possession of the Duke of Northumberland at Alnwick Castle. It is a sardonyx with a nude figure of Philoctetes in Lemnos, seated on the ground : in his right hand he holds a bird's wing, using it to fan his wounded foot, which is bound round with bandages. In the upper part of the field is the name Boethos, BOH0OY, cut in relief. The design of this cameo is very skilfully contrived to fill up the surface of the gem in the most complete way, and the details are cut with great minuteness and naturalistic truth, especially noticeable in the head and in the modelling of the chest and ribs. In spite of Stephani's opinion to the contrary, this cameo bears all the marks of being a genuine antique work of the Augustan age: see Annali Inst. 1881, p. 266. Mr King has however suggested that the name Boethos is not that of the engraver of the cameo, but that the gem was copied from an embossed relief in silver by the celebrated sculptor and caelator named Boethos, who is mentioned by Pliny {Hist. Nat. XXXIII. 155) as being one of the principal Greek workers in the precious metals, and (//■. N. XXXIV. 84) as being the sculptor of the boy struggling with a goose, of which ancient replicas are now in the Vatican Museum and elsewhere. However this may be, the motive of this cameo is an early one. It occurs on an intaglio of the scarab type, within a cable Cameo of Protar- chos. Cameo of Boethos. The Caela- torBoethos. 86 CAMEOS INSCRIBED WITH [chap. VII. Incised names. Dioskoit- rides\ Cellini. border, in the British Museum; see Brit. Mus. Cat. No. 455 ; and Annali Inst. 1857, P^- H., fig. 6\ Although, as is remarked above, cameos on which the engraver's signature is incised must be viewed with suspicion, it cannot be said that in all cases such incised names are modern forgeries. More than one is accepted as genuine by Dr Brunn^ as, for example, the paste head of Augustus signed by Herophilos, mentioned above at page "jQ. The cameo of Anteros (p. 81) is also an example of undoubted genuineness. In the Berlin Museum there is a magnificent sardonyx cameo with a figure of Hercules dragging Cerberus by his chain, a most exquisitely modelled and minutely finished work, with, in the exergiie, the name AIOCKOYPIAOY. This cameo certainly was known in the i6th century : part of the field is broken away and is now replaced in plain gold. With regard to the inotive of this cameo, an interesting passage occurs in the Autobiography of the Florentine artist Benvenuto Cellini, lib. I. cap. 27. Cellini tells us that during his first stay in Rome (from 1524 to 1527) he was in the habit of buying from the peasants large numbers of ancient gems, which they found while digging in the vineyards in and around Rome. Among these was the emerald with the dolphins head, mentioned below at page 135, and a mag- nificent head of Minerva on a large topaz. The finest of them all was, Cellini says, a cameo with figures of Hercules subduing Cerberus, which he showed to Michelangelo, who remarked that it was the most wonderful piece of work he had ever seen. It is not impossible that the cameo described by Cellini is the one now in the Berlin collection". ' Both the cameo and the British Museum intaglio are described by Milani, Mito di Filotete, p. 86, and PI. u. ^ In his Gesch. der Griecli. Kiinstlei-, 1859, Vol. u. Dr Brunn discusses and modifies the conclusions arrived at by Kohler and Stephani, Gesammclte Schriften, 1850-3, in which work almost all gem signatures are taken to be forgeries. ^ II need hardly be said that Kohler refuses to accept this gem as a genuine CHAP. VII.] THE ARTIST'S NAME. ^7 Cameos of Sostratos. In the Museum at Naples there is a very fine sardonyx cameo engraved with a figure of Victory driving a biga, over which is incised the inscription CfiCTPATOY. The gem once belonged to Lorenzo de' Medici and has LAVR, MED. en- graved under the horses of the biga. Among the gems of the Carlisle collection, recently pur- chased for the British Museum, is a fine onyx cameo with Cupid leading a chariot drawn by two panthers. In the exergue the name CQCTPATOY is incised in minute letters. The same name occurs on a small, delicately cut intaglio in the same collection, with a figure of a winged Victory sacrificing a bull, on which she rests one knee. The name CQCTPATOY is cut in the exergue in very small characters'. Both these appear to be undoubtedly genuine examples of an artist's signature. If the truth could be known it would probably be found that a large proportion of so-called artists' signatures on gems of all sorts really are names of owners, more especially in the case of signet gems, intaglios. Artists were much more likely to introduce their own names on cameos for the reasons which are indicated at pages 92 — 93. If however the same name is found to be repeated on several gems of similar date and style, as is the case with the above-mentioned name Sostratos, we may fairly assume that it is the genuine signature of an engraver. Gem signatures, unlike artists' names on coins, are rarely cut on part of the engraved device ; usually they are placed in the field. There are however one or two possible excep- tions to this rule, as, for example, the full faced head of the dog Sirius, with a collar round his neck. Several replicas and Sirius copies of this exist^: one of the finest is No. 270 in the Marl- borough collection, engraved on a very beautiful oriental carbuncle: it has TAIOC 6110161 on the collar'. Owners' names. antique : in fact he denies the authenticity of all the signatures of Dioskourides : see Gesamm. Schrift. in. p. 287. 1 This gem is published by Tassie, Plate XLV. No. 7760. ^ One in the Berlin Museum, cut on rock crystal by Lorenzo Massini for Baron Stosch, has the modern signature MACINOC (Masini) ETTOIEI. ^ The signature on the Sirius gem in the Marlborough collection, and even 88 artists' names on [chap. VII. Victory of Onatas. Dates of signed gems. Gem of Syrias. The two similar gems in the British Museum, from the Payne Knight and the Blacas collections (Nos. 1115 and 1 1 16), are without the signature. A very beautiful and large chalcedony gem in the British Museum {Brit. Mus. Cat. No. 1161), engraved with a figure of Victory erecting a trophy, a somewhat similar design to that on a Syracusan tetradrachm of Agathocles, has, on the ribbon-like folds of a long flag attached to a spear, in characters of somewhat indistinct form, what is possibly the artist's name ONATA[I]' The genuineness of this noble gem has been questioned, but Furtwangler and other good authorities accept it as a genuine Greek work of the early part of the 4th century B.C. With regard to the dates when engraved gems most frequently received the signature of the artist, it may be remarked that this was very rarely done before the 4th cen- tury B.C. In fact signed gems were very exceptional through- out the whole of the autonomous Greek period ; by far the majority of those which now exist are the work of Greek engravers during the time of the Roman Empire, especially the Augustan period. There is however in the British Museum (No. 479 in Mr A. H. Smith's Catalogue) one very remarkable signed gem which apparently is not later than the middle or latter part of the 6th century B.C. It is one of those curious scarabaeoids which have on the curved back a design carved in delicate relief — in this case a Satyr's head — the earliest form of cameo, mentioned above at page 59. The device sunk on the flat or signet side of the scara- baeoid is a standing figure of a bearded harp-player, and round the edge of ih.e field is the inscription which Mr A. H. Smith gives as WPIA^ ^POm^^'. the gem itself is by no means above the suspicion of being the work of Natter, the name is probably a blunder for FNAIOC- ' Furtwangler is inclined to read the inscription N A I A ; see yahrbuch Arch. Inst. 1888, p. 204. ^ Others read the name of the artist, not as Surias, but as Dories, AO 1*1^5 ; see Furtwangler, yahrbuch Arch. Inst. 1888, p. 196, and PI. 8, No. 1. CHAP. VII.] GEMS AND COINS. 89 This is a quite exceptional gem : almost no others occur with an artist's signature till the 4th century B.C., to which period the various signed gems found at Kertch evidently belong ; see page 73. In the case of Greek coins, artists' signatures were not uncommon during the latter part of the 5th century B.C., but the greater number belong to the first half of the 4th century. On Roman coins artists' signatures are unknown. On Greek z/aj^j painters' names were most common during Signed the 6th and 5th centuries B.C., and till about the middle of the '"""'' 4th century. After the time of Alexander artists' names on pottery soon totally disappear. Artists' Names on Coins. As some guide to forming a judgment with regard to signatures on gems it may be well to consider the somewhat analogous case of coins which bear the artist's signature. With very few exceptions, the coins on which artists' Signed names occur are those of Sicily and Magna Graecia during the 5th and 4th centuries B.C., especially coins of Syracuse, Catana, Metapontum, Tarentum, Heraklaea, Velia, Thurium, Camarina and a few others. The great decadrachms of Syracuse, signed by Kimon and Euainetos, are among the coins. chief glories of numismatic art. The name is usually in the nominative, the word ETTOIEI being understood, though in some cases the genitive is used, as if before EPfON ; and it is cut in very small characters — sometimes of microscopic minuteness. As a rule the artist inserts it in a way that makes it as little conspicuous as possible, so as not to rival the importance of the type legend. For this reason it is frequently introduced on some detail of the design ; thus, for example, Kimon signs on a dolphin under the main head on the obverse, or on the band which binds the hair of Persephone. go ARTISTS NAMES [chap. VII. Eukleidas. Mr Evans on signed coins. Kimon the elder. The name EYKAEIAAZ occurs among the ornaments of Athene's helmet on a Syracusan tetradrachm : and in many other cases the signature escapes all but the most minute examination. In some examples the name is more con- spicuous, though cut in microscopic characters, as on some Syracusan reverses, which have a tablet inscribed EYAINETO held by a flying Victory — possibly a sort of pattern or trial- piece by this wonderful engraver. Mr A. J. Evans, in his Horsemen of Tarentum, 1888, page 120, was the first to point out that, very frequently, when a coin has the same name repeated twice, the signature in the one case was, probably, introduced as that of the engraver of the coin-die, and, in the other case, as that of the same person, not in his quality of artist, but as the ap'yvpoKO'jro';, or actual striker of the coin, as a guarantee for its being of the requisite weight and purity of metal. This very ingenious suggestion satisfactorily explains what was previously a very puzzling problem. It may yet be possible to discover some definite reason for these names being sometimes in the nominative and sometimes in the possessive case. On many coins the artist's name is not given in full, as it usually is on gems, but in a contracted form or with an initial only. As Mr Evans has pointed out, the same coin- engraver seems often to have worked for more than one city ; coins of different colonies both in Magna Graecia and Sicily occurring with the same signature. A very interesting paper on the signed coins of Sicily and Magna Graecia was recently read by Mr Evans before the Numismatic Society in London, and will shortly be printed in the Num. Chron., Vol. for 1890. Several examples of hitherto unpublished coins with artists' names, in the pos- session of the writer, were described in this paper ; among them were the following — a tetradrachm of Himera with the usual reverse, the nymph Himera sacrificing at an altar; on the cornice of the altar, in letters of microscopic minute- ness, is the signature KIMON. The remarkable thing about this unique coin is that its style shows it to be not later CHAP. VII.] ON GREEK COINS. 91 Eziar- chid as. Exakes- tidas. than about 470 to 465 B.C., and therefore it suppHes an example of a signed coin nearly half a century earlier than any which had previously been known. The artist who signs himself KIMON may possibly be the Kimon the grandfather of the later KIMQN, whose name occurs on a dolphin under the head of Persephone on one of the cele- brated Syracusan decadrachms which were struck towards the close of the 5th century, and also on other coins of the same city. Another signed coin, hitherto unpublished, was a Syra- cusan tetradrachm with the artist's name EYAPXIAAS, a die- engraver who worked in conjunction with the Syracusan Phrygillos, who is mentioned below. A new signature of EEAKEZTIAAZ occurs on a tetra- drachm of Kamarina, not cut on the exergiial line, but on a double pinax or diptych (tttu/cto? wlva^) held by a flying Nike over the victorious quadriga on the reverse. As a commentary on the gem-like style of the coins of Sicily and Magna Graecia during the Sth and 4th centuries B.C., it is worth while to notice that one very beautiful gem, with a seated figure of Eros playing with astragali, has an apparently authentic artist's signature PYriAAOZ ; and that Phrygillos. the same artist's name occurs on several very beautiful coins, as, for example, on the obverse of a Syracusan tetradrachm of a little before 400 B.C. with a head of Persephone. The reverse type, a quadriga, has the signature of another artist, who signs himself EY0, perhaps for Eu^y/io?. It is quite possible that the gem with the figure of Eros may be the work of the same Phrygillos who engraved the Syracusan coin obverse ; Raoul Rochette and (more recently) Furtwangler and Mr A. J. Evans have accepted this theory 1. The very few artists' names that occur on coins outside of Sicily and Magna Graecia are sometimes treated in a different Eros of Phrygillos. 1 See Furtwangler's Gemmen mii Kiinstlerinschriften, " Jahrbuch des Kais. Deuts. Jnstit." 1888, Band ill. p. 197, PI. 8, No. 4. I have not been able to ascertain who is now the possessor of the Eros of Phrygillos. On Sicilian coins with artists' names, see Rudolf Weil, Die Kimstlerinschriften der Sicilischen Miinzen; Berlin, 1884. 92 SIGNED COINS. [CHAP. VII. Theodoios. Neuantos. Pytho- doros. Coins of Arcadia. Signed vases. way, being cut in larger, more conspicuous characters, and having, in two cases, the word ETTOEI (sic) after them. A beautiful tetradrachm of Clazomene in Ionia (near Smyrna) has a full-faced head of Apollo on the obverse, and by it, in the field, in two straight lines, the signature GEOAOTOZ EnOEI. The position of the head on the die is arranged so as to give ample room for this inscription, which is by no means hidden away, like most of the former class of signatures. A similar inscription occurs on a much less beautiful tetradrachm of Cydonia in Crete, which has on the obverse a profile head of Ariadne, and in the field the signature NEYANTOI EnOEI. Both these remarkable coins are of about the middle of the 4th century B.C. A third Cretan coin, of the city of Aptera, near Cydonia, has the signature r'Y0OAQ[POZ] in large letters, but without the word hvoUi, which only occurs on the two last mentioned coins. Coins struck in the mainland of Greece very rarely bear an artist's signature. The most notable examples are the fine silver staters issued about the middle of the 4th century B.C. by the Arcadian Federation. On the obverse is a noble head of Zeus Lycaeos, and, on the reverse, a figure of Pan seated on a rock, with the pedum or shepherd's crook in his hand. On the rock, in minute characters, is the engraver's signature OAYM. or more rarely XAPI.; see Head, Hist. Num. page 373- It may at first seem strange that artists' names should be so rare on gems and coins, and so common upon Greek vases — which belong to an inferior grade in the rank of the lesser arts. The reason is probably this, the coin-type was a thing of public importance and had a distinctly sacred character, so it may usually have been thought presumptuous for an artist to introduce his name in such a place*. Again, ' The sacred character of the types on coins was the reason why portraits of CHAP. VII.] INSCRIBED GEMS. 93 the gem was meant for personal use as a signet, and most men probably would have objected to another name than their own being set on their seals ; unless the engraver were an artist of such fame that his signature materially added to the value of the gem, as appears to have sometimes been the case in the Roman Imperial period. With painted pottery the case was different : a maker's or painter's name could offend nobody, and was, proportionally, of quite insignificant size, in no way interfering with the painted pictures on the vase. If however the gem were large and not intended for use as a signet, such as the Julia of Enodos, or still more if it were a cameo, there would be less reason to object to an artist's name being inscribed upon it. In all cases where the name on a gem is cut in large letters, and is in the genitive, it may (if not a modern ad- dition) be considered to be the name of the owner. Owners' names in the nominative also occur, but not usually in minute characters such as engravers used. A certain number of gems exist which have the name of some distinguished sculptor, such as Pheidias or Scopas : in most cases these are obviously modern forgeries, but there may possibly be some antique Roman examples in which a gem has a copy of some piece of sculpture together with the name, not of the en- graver of the gem, but of the sculptor of the original statue. 3. Explanatory words : on many Oriental cylinders, in addition to the owner's name, an inscription explains who are the gods or heroes engraved upon it. So also Greek scarabs and scarabaeoids of the 6th and 5th century B.C. have in some cases names cut by the side of the figures on them to explain the subject, a very common practice on the painted vases of the same period. This is specially the case with the scarabs found in Etruscan tombs, both those which are imports of Hellenic workmanship and those which are native Etruscan imitations of Greek designs ; see above, page 14. Again, on Graeco-Roman and Roman gems which re- living persons were not introduced till comparatively late times, after the death of Alexander the Great. Use of mns. Vases. Owners'' names. Sculptors' names. Words on scarabs. 94 INSCRIPTIONS ON [CHAP. VII. Words of explan- ation. Magic words. present some god or goddess the inscribe-d name of the deity is frequently added. This was specially necessary with the crowd of deified abstractions which appear so often on coins and gems of the Empire ; since in many cases it would be impossible to know what subject was intended without a word of explanation, such as Concordia, Miinificentia, Felicitas, Indulgentia, or the like, the symbols and attributes used by the Roman artists being not sufficiently numerous and varied to indicate, with- out ambiguity, so large a collection of abstractions. On the finest gems both of the Greek and the Graeco- Roman period inscriptions of this class rarely occur — the device being intended to tell its own story, and the artist having sufficient skill to do so in a sufficiently intelligible manner. 4. Talismanic INSCRIPTIONS occur frequently on the later Roman gems used by the Mithraic, Gnostic and other mystic sects. The magical word Abraxas^, and the names of the three Gnostic Aeons, lAQ, COAOMON, CABAQ are of specially common occurrence. A great number of other mysterious combinations of letters were cut on these talismanic stones. The Paris Biblio- th^que contains a large and varied collection; see Chabouillet's Catalogue, p. 282 seq.^ A profession of the Divine Unity (like that of a modern Moslem) is of frequent occurrence on gems of the second century A.D. — 6IC 06OC CAPAllIC, and other similar phrases : see Nos. 20 and 105, Fitzwilliam Catalogue. In several places {H. N. XXXVII. [24 &c.) Pliny expresses his contempt for the superstitious belief in the magical power of gems, but nevertheless these mystic devices were very popular under the late Empire, especially when one of the favourite Roman cults arose out of a combination of the ^ The meaning of the word Abraxas is explained in the Appendix; Cat. of Fitz, Gems, No. 20. ^ For information on this curious subject see Matter, Histoire du gnosticisme, Paris, 1850; and C. W. King, The Gnostics and their remains, 2nd ed. London, CHAP. VII.] ENGRAVED GEMS. 95 Gnostic philosophy of Alexandria with the mystical Mithraic worship of Persia. 5. Words of greeting and the like: these are common Words of on gems of the Roman Imperial period, usually written in S""^''"'- Greek: as, for example, XAIPE, EYTYXI, MNHMONEYE (see No. no, Fitz. Cat),. 4>IAEI ME, ZHCAIC nOAAOIC eieCIN and the like. A curious onyx cameo in the Marlborough collection (No. 643) appears to have been a love gift from a lady. It is engraved with a hand pinching an ear and the inscription MNHMONBYe MOY THC KAAHC YYXHC eYTYXI C(jO*PONI "Remember me, your pretty love. Good luck to you, Sophronios." Inscriptions such as this are frequently cut in cameo, 'and occupy the whole field of the stone : they usually have the letters cut in relief in the white stratum of an onyx, on a dark ground. Proverbial phrases sometimes occur on late Roman gems; Proverbs. the following Philosophical maxim is specially common — AeyovcTiv a OeKovaiv Aeyercoaav Ov fj,e\€i. fioi. A free translation of this phrase is inscribed over the doors of various houses in Scotland, built in the i6th and 17th centuries ; 'S;{)£g fiaff gatlr. ®u6at sag tfteg .? Hat t^ame sag. An example in the Paris Bibliothtque has the following addition at the end of this phrase CY*IAeMe CYM*EPICOI meaning " Love me : it is for your advantage (to do so)." 96 VOTIVE GEMS. [CHAP. VII. Votive 6. Dedicatory inscriptions on gems are rare. An ^^^' example is in the Marlborough collection, No. 256 — a very large nicolo, with Astarte on a lion and the Dioscuri. In the exergue \s cut AMMQNI02 ANE0HKE EH' AfAOQ, "Ammonios dedicated this for a blessing." It is a gem of the late Empire, probably of North African workmanship. A sardonyx cameo of the Roman Imperial period, with a male and female portrait head facing each other, in the Hermitage Museum at St Petersburg, has, between the two faces, the names AA't'HOC CYN APHOOONI, in incised letters. This is probably a votive inscription, the cameo having been dedicated in some temple, perhaps by a husband and wife\ The Vir- In the middle ages this gem was preserved in the treasury of the Abbey of St Germain-des-Prds, where it was revered as having been the betrothal ring of St Joseph and the Virgin Mary ; it is worn smooth with the kisses of thousands of pilgrims. When the Abbey was sacked, during the French Re- volution, this venerated cameo was carried off and sold to a Russian General, who presented it to the collection of the Emperor of Russia. ^ Some archaeologists explain this inscription as being the signature of two joint gem-engravers, but the inscription seems to be later than the cameo itself, and is larger and more conspicuous than is usually the case with artists' signatures on gems. gm s ring. 97 CHAPTER VIII. The Characteristics of Ancient Gems. Fine Greek or Graeco-Roman engraved gems are among the most beautiful works of art that exist. They combine noble design and exquisite, but not too minute, finish with the greatest beauty of material, such as the rich, brilliantly coloured sard or the sapphirine chalcedony with its exquisitely soft, milky lustre. The more brilliant varieties of sard glow with a sort of internal lustre when held up to the light, and the device engraved upon them comes out at once soft in effect, and clear in outline, with a sort of beauty which hardly can be rivalled in any other branch of art. Small as gems are in scale, the Greek artist possessed the rare secret of giving grandeur of effect without the aid of great size ; and some of the most minute gem engravings seem to have all the dignity of a large group or bust in marble or bronze'. As a rule the general design or composition of an antique gem is very skilfully contrived to occupy as fully as possible the " field " or flat surface of the stone, leaving the least possible quantity of empty margin. In the gems of the 6th century B.C. this principle is sometimes carried almost too far, and the figures are occasionally bent into somewhat strained ^ This grandeur of effect produced by work on the smallest scale is well exem- plified by the wonderful "Siris bronzes" in the British Museum, and by the still more beautiful heroic figure from the Lago di Bracciano, which is exhibited in the same case; see A. S. Murray, Hist, of Greek Sculpture, 2nd ed. 1890, II., page 346, where the latter statuette is illustrated under the title "Bronze from Tarentum.'' M. 7 Beauty of E^ems. Grandeur of style. 98 CHARACTERISTICS OF [CHAP. VIII. Skilful composi- tion. Borders. Modern style. Roman style. attitudes in order to bring them within and yet close up to the curved Hmits of the " field." An example of this is illustrated in fig. i6 at page 25. But in the best work of the 5 th and 4th centuries B.C. the highest amount of skill and taste is shown in designing the composition so as to fall easily and gracefully within the necessary limits^: see fig. 17 at page 26. Thus we find that in the best class of gems with a guillodie border the most projecting portion of the composition is often allowed to encroach slightly upon the border, thus giving a look of freedom to the whole, and making the border an essential part, not a mere frame, to the design. In the finest gems with a border in the Fitzwilliam collection this is the case : see Nos. 5, 10 and 11 on Plate I. In the early Greek painted vases of what is called the Oriental style the same dislike to unoccupied spaces is to be seen — the so-called horror vacui, which leads the painter to fill up his ground by a seme pattern of rosettes, crosses and other ornaments. One of the most obvious differences between antique and modern gems is this absence of margin or unoccupied space in the former class. Thus the exquisite Diomede with the Palladium from Lorenzo de' Medici's collection, though in some respects very Greek in style, being copied from an antique, is very unlike an ancient gem in the wide extent of margin all round the figure. The Poniatowski forgeries have the same modern peculi- arity ; see, for example, Modern Gems, No. 11 in the catalogue of the Fitzwilliam gems in the Appendix. In the case of Roman gems this rule does not apply ; the device by no means invariably fills up the whole field. Far less skill and taste are shown in adapting the design to the shape and size of the gem. The same remark may be made with regard to Roman coins, especially the reverses of aurei 1 In Greek coins of the best style we see the same fully occupied field, and the same wonderful skill in suiting the design to the space. On Roman coins these points are much less attended to by the die-cutters. CHAP. VIII.] ANCIENT GEMS. 99 and denarii of the Imperial period, with a single standing figure of some deity or deified abstraction, the scale of which is frequently small in comparison to the whole circular field of the coin, leaving a large proportion of unoccupied space on each side of the figure. Another noticeable point is that, while many modern gems are pictorial in style, those of the ancients are rather of a scidpturesqiie character — simple in composition, with very few figures, seldom more than three during the best periods ; and the whole design is treated strictly on one plane, like the relief-sculpture of all good artists. The skilful treatment of the 'relief with a certain monotony of surface, avoiding excessive projection, is one of the chief characteristics of good Greek work. In gems of the Roman period the ' relief is often much exaggerated, with an excessive roundness of form, very un- like the flat relief of the 5th century B.C. In many cases this excessive amount of projection suggests that the design is a copy of some piece of sculpture in the round. Apart from the details of the treatment, the whole design of some gems of Imperial date shows that the gem-engraver has copied some statue of large scale, regardless of the fact that the design was quite unsuited for reproduction on a minute scaled On fine Greek gems, on the contrary, the design is exactly suited to the very stone it is cut upon, seldom looking like a reduced copy of some larger work, and still less like a reproduction of a statue. All these rules are however quite useless for distinguishing between ancient and modern gems when the work of a clever forger is in question, a man who has carefully studied and copied the characteristics of genuine antique gems. The fact is that in no other class of art is it so difificult to distinguish the genuine from the false ; partly because age makes no alteration, gives no patina to a hard polished gem ; and secondly, because, owing to the hardness of the material Rovian coins. Simplicity of treat- ment. Copies of statues. Tests for gems. ^ 'Relief is here used as referring, not to the intaglio itself, but to the impres- sion from it. ^ For examples of this, see page 78. 7—2 lOO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ANCIENT [CHAP. VIII. Copies of antique sems. Ficid re- Original polish. Tests for forgeries. and the laborious method of working it, there is necessarily something mechanical in the process of engraving a gem, which diminishes the prominence of the artist's personal peculiarities and touch. Moreover many of the cleverest forgeries are copies of some antique gem or paste, so there is nothing in the design to betray a modern origin. Copies made by the most skilful engravers of the last century, such as Natter, Pichler and Burch, are often quite indistinguishable from antiques, es- pecially when we remember that a highly polished, fresh- looking surface is not always a proof that the gem is modern. A large number of genuine antique gems have had their flat field repolished in modern times, much, of course, to the injury of the work. This unfortunate habit was specially prevalent in the 17th and i8th centuries: many of the best gems of the Marlborough and Devonshire collections have been sadly spoilt by this reckless treatment. And again, many gems, which have rested undisturbed in a tomb, still have their original polish as fresh and brilliant as when the stone was first cut. The skilful forger is careful to use only such tools as were in use among the ancients, and there are often no means of deciding whether a wheel cut or a drill cavity in a hard gem was made yesterday or more than two thousand years ago, A great number of different tests have been suggested for the recognition of genuine and forged gems ; but the imitation of none of these criteria presents any real difficulty to a skilful and intelligent forger. Proofs of antiquity have been said to be these — extensive use of the " diamond-point,'' complete internal polish of the details of the design ; and again internal polish which, though once complete, has been slightly dulled, as if clouded by the human breath. With a little extra trouble any modern engraver can polish the whole of his design ; and a drawing-stump with some diamond or emery powder will readily take off the apparent freshness of the polish, and give the requisite clouded look to the work. CHAP. VIII.] AND MODERN GEMS. lOI A still better method of clouding the original polish has Tricks of been recently adopted by the Roman forgers. A shower of diamond dust is blown out of a small tube against the sunk part of the intaglio ; a method which was suggested by the " sand-blast " which is sometimes used on a large scale to drill or carve stone for building purposes. The more obvious signs of age, such as a worn surface, covered with fine scratches, are given to modern gems in many different ways. The most deceptive appearance of long wear is produced by cramming the newly cut gem down a turkey's throat, and leaving it for a few days to be shaken up with the bits of stone and gravel which are contained in the turkey's craw. Freshly cut cameos readily take the marks of age, first by the use of the ordinary rubbing and scratching processes, and secondly by the use of a mixture of iron filings in acid, which rapidly gives to the white layer of an onyx the dead, glossless look which is frequently the result of great age. Even the fact that a gem is seen to be in its original Set gems antique ring-setting is no absolute security against fraud. The present writer has seen in the work-shop of a Roman intagliatore a skilful engraver at work on an antique gem which had been found set in a massive gold signet-ring on the skeleton hand of the occupant of an Etruscan tomb. Without removing the gem from its setting the engraver rapidly drilled out the very slight and shallow original design, and produced another much more imposing intaglio, with a very beautiful head, carefully copied from a Syracusan coin : the subsequent treatment of the gem with emery and diamond powder entirely removed its obvious look of freshness, and the original setting remained as a false witness to the antiquity of the work. The result of all this is that in many cases no archae- ologist, however learned, can attain to real certainty about the age of a gem — a quite trustworthy criterion has yet to be discovered. Fortunately in most cases imitations of antique gems are not the work of a forger who combines sufficient knowledge I02 CAMEOS RE-WORKED. [CHAP. VIII. Gems rC'Citt. Pistrttcci. Cameo Flora. St George and the dragon. with the requisite skill, and a careful study of ancient gems will save the student or collector from being deceived by any except forgeries of the most skilful kind. Among the most difficult cases to distinguish are those gems, which, though originally antique, have been partially or wholly re-cut by a modern hand. In the last century, and even more recently, this was a very common trick of the Italian dealers, especially in the case of cameos. A very large cameo on a magnificent sardonyx, now in the St Petersburg collection, was wholly reworked early in this century by Benvenuto Pistrucci, who (without any fraudulent intention) executed much work of this kind for the Roman dealers, when he was a young man working in Rome, about the year 1804. The St Petersburg cameo represents a Roman Emperor standing and being crowned by a female personifica- tion of some city. The gem was originally very late Roman work of the rudest execution. It is now well-cut work, which appears to be of the style of the early empire. Pistrucci, who was born in 1784, was the last of the really distinguished gem-engravers of modern times. He was the artist of the famous cameo head of Flora, a work of purely modern design on a fragmentary onyx, which he executed for a small sum for some unscrupulous dealer, who sold it for ;£'500 to Payne Knight as an antique Greek gem'. Pistrucci wrote a very interesting autobiography, in which he gives an instructive account of how this and others of his early gems were passed off by the Roman dealers as antiques ; see p. 147 of Dr Billing's Science of Gems, 1867, in which extracts from this autobiography are published. Pistrucci was employed as a die-cutter in London under George IV. and William IV. He is the author of the fine group of St George and the dragon which is still used on the English sovereigns and crowns — a very happy contrast to the dies produced by more recent artists. 1 Payne Knight's taste and knowledge are exemplified by the fact that he tried hard to prevent the purchase for a comparatively trifling sum of the Elgin marbles on the ground that they were inferior works of art, and of Roman Imperial date ! 103 CHAPTER IX. The Technique of Gem-engraving {SaKTv\ioyXv(l>ia or XidovpyiK'ij). The tools used by the ancient gem-engravers were mainly Tools for of three different sorts, namely the drill, the wheel and the %;„„, " diamond-point!' In using all these the gem itself was firmly fixed in a bed of cement made of pitch and pounded pottery {testae ttmsae). The tools were held in the engraver's hand, who thus had a greater freedom of touch than a modern gem-engraver, who usually works in the reverse way, having his drills and wheels fixed, and the gem loose in his hand*. I. The drill {Tpmavov, hence mod. Italian drepanoY The drill. was worked in the old fashion, which still survives in the East : the string of a small bow was wound round the stick of the drill, which was made to revolve by moving the bow rapidly backwards and forwards. The butt end of the drill revolved inside a cap or tube, which the engraver held in his hand, and so directed the point to the right place ; he could not, of course, hold the drill by its revolving part. It is only long practice that enables a workman to manage successfully the difficult task of carrying on simultaneously a distinct movement with each hand ; so in some cases, espe- cially when working larger sculpture, an assistant worked the ^ The word yKitjyuv is used by the Greeks for the process of engraving gems : hence the modern phrase "glyptic art." In Latin scalpere has the same meaning, but it is also used for other processes, such as carving in marble, equivalent, that is, to the word sculpere; see Pliny, H. N. xxxvi. 15. ^ The word rSpvos (Latin tornus) appears to be used for any revolving tool ; thus it means both the drill and the wheel of the gem-engraver, as well as the lathe used in many different crafts. 104 USE OF THE DRILL [CHAP. IX. bow, leaving the engraver free to direct the point of the drill. This is indicated in some of the reliefs found in Egyptian tombs which represent sculptors at work on statues of por- phyry or granite, materials of such hardness that they could only be worked by drills and emery. Sculptor's A Roman sarcophagus, published by Bliimner, Technologie, III. p. 220, has a very interesting relief showing a sculptor at work on a lion's head which is one of the ornaments on a fluted sarcophagus which he is carving. He holds in his hand a pipe-drill which is made to revolve, not by a bow, but by a cord which a boy assistant is pulling backwards and forwards, the rpv-navla of Pollux, X. 146. Drill In i88q — go Mr Flinders Petrie found in tombs in Upper bows. Egypt several examples of the bows used to work small drills. They are of hard wood, about 14 inches long, slightly bent, and have near each end a square hole in which the cord was fastened. Exactly similar bows are commonly used even now for drilling both in the East and elsewhere. Fire drill. The word rpv-rravov also means an instrument used in Tpimvm"" kindling fire ; the primitive method being to get a spark by the friction of a drill of hard wood, worked with the bow so as to bore a hole in a piece of softer wood ; cf Soph. Frag. 640. Many of these " fire-sticks " have been found in Egypt, with rows of drilled holes in them, each charred by the friction of the drill. The same method of getting fire by friction is still em- ployed by various savage races, who work the drill both with and without the bow. Gem-cut- In gem-engraving the point of the drill, which cut into the xaXKevrbv stone, was of soft metal, usually bronze, and varied in size from rpiivanv. ^j^^t of an Ordinary pin to a good-sized knitting needle or even larger. The actual cutting of the drill was done, not by the metal, but by the fine emery powder (a/xvpL<;, Naxiuin) which, mixed with oil, was kept constantly smeared upon it. The minute particles of emery, which is a form of corundum, stick in the soft metal under the pressure, and so give a steady cutting surface. If hard steel were used the emery powder would not adhere to the drill, and the cutting would go on much CHAP. IX.J AND BOW. lOS slower\ Even wood or bone in connection with emery will make an excellent drill. Some of the Hill-tribes of India even now drill quartz-crystal with a piece of bamboo and emery or sand and water, using the bow to make the drill revolve. The drill and bow-string were not tools peculiar to the gem-engraver, but were used in all the arts of carving and sculpture from the ship-wright upwards. Drills on a large scale, such as augers for boring planks, were worked by a cord held by a man at each end, as is described by Homer {Od. IX. 382 — 386) in the passage about Odysseus destroying the eye of Polyphemus. A very interesting gem in the British Museum (No. 305) a Greek scarab of the 5th century B.C., has a well executed figure of a workman (shown in fig. 21), probably a gem-engraver, using the bow-drill on some small object fixed upon a table. Wooden drill. Carpen- ter's drill. Gem-cutter at work. Fig. 2 1. Greek scarab of the 5th century B.C. showing a man working with the bow and drill : double the real size. Pliny (Hist. Nat. XXXVI. 54) speaks of the Naxium, or Emery. emery of the island of Naxos, as being the best for cutting and polishing gems ^ He gives {Hist. Nat. XXXVII. 200) an interesting list of the different tools used in gem-engraving. Speaking of the varying hardness of stones, he says, " tanta differentia est ut aliae ferro scalpi non possint, aliae non nisi retunso, omnes 1 It is for this reason that modern diamond-cutters use, not a steel, but a copper wheel for forming the facets when they are cutting a brilliant, rose- or table-diamond. "- The Naxian emery at the present day affords to the Greek government a revenue of more than ^30, 000 a year. io6 THEOPHRASTUS ON THE [CHAP. IX. Pliny on gein-ctit- ting. Theophras- tus on gem- cuttins:. Pliny on Theo- phrasius. autem adamante : plurimum vero in iis terebrarum proficit fervor." His meaning appears to be this — " only the softest signet- stones (such as steatite) can be engraved by the unaided iron graver ; some require the (comparatively) blunt point of a metal drill (used with emery). All stones can be cut with the adamas-point, (that is by diamond or sapphire) ; but the tool which is the most effective of all is the rapidly revolving drill." Theophrastus makes the following statements with regard to the engraving of gems — ovTai dfi^Xeai Se. This paragraph, which is unfortunately full of lacunae, seems to be the one from which Pliny is quoting in the above mentioned passage, H. N. XXXVII. 200. It is possible that the text of Theo- phrastus might be amended and the lacunae partly filled up by the help of this translation, which appears to be given by Pliny from a more perfect codex than any which now exists. The phrase "non nisi retunso" is clearly Pliny's rendering of Theophrastus' o-t8?7p/ot? /xev, dp,^Xkab Se. Theophrastus wrote his short treatise on gems about the year 315 B.C. In most of the archaic gems, and again in those of the period of Roman decadence, the use of the drill is very conspicuous'; short curly hair of men or animals is often 1 In this passage the word fxei^bvuiv is probably corrupt, since the size of gems has nothing to do with their relative hardness. ^ The archaic glandular gem in the Fitzwilliam collection shows the use of the drill clearly all over the body of the eagle : see Plate I. No. 2. CHAP. IX.] GEM-ENGRAVERS TOOLS. 107 represented by a series of close-set drill holes even in work of a good period. The general blocking out of the figures seems to have been mainly done with the bow-drill, the final modelling and details being put in afterwards with other tools. Some ancient gems have never been carried further than the initial drill-work, and look unfinished. There are many of these among the 6th and 5th century .scarabs in the British Museum ; such as No. 447, a red jasper Mode of using the drill. Fig. 22. Etruscan gem in red jasper, with three figures rudely blocked out with the blunt drill (the "retunsum" of Pliny). The inscribed names [AFAjMeM- vu]v, AAENeXaos and TTATpoR-Xos are probably a modern addition, the work of some dealer, in order to enhance the selling value of the gem : real size. scarab, which represents a standing hero between two seated figures ; see fig. 22. The same use of the drill can frequently be seen in Greek coins, especially for the hair of men\ and very commonly in the legends, the letters of which were formed by first drilling in the iron die a small hole at the end of each straight stroke, and then lines were cut joining the pairs of drill-holes^ The emery drill on a larger scale was a very important masons' and sculptors' tool in ancient Egypt and among the early Greeks, as is mentioned above at page 104. Drill-work OP, coins. 1 This habit of representing hair of a crisp, curly sort by drill-holes seems to have influenced the Greek vase painters of the best "red-figure" period. The hair of .heroes on 5th century pottery is often represented by close set dots or pellets of the fine creamy black enamel, giving a fine effect of texture and gloss by the slight relief of the enamel dots. ' For example the legends on the later tetradrachms of Athens with Magistrates' names are very obviously formed in this way, the work being coarse in execution. In better work the drilled terminations are less conspicuous. A pebble with a hole drilled through it, i^^0os TeTpvn-qnivq, was used by the Athenians at their judicial ballots for ■• vote of condemnation; the undrilled stone, ^rirpo^ TrX-fiprji, being the sign of a vote of acquittal ; see Aeschin. XI. 34. io8 THE TUBULAR DRILL [CHAP. IX. Tube- drills. Alabasti. Tube-drill zised for zems. Without it, it would have been impossible to work the intensely hard basalts and granites of Egypt, or the con- glomerate of Mycenae and Tiryns. The tubular drill: for work on a larger scale a tubular form of drill was used ; that is, a bronze tube, either with loose emery powder, or else with minute crystals of corundum set along the working edge of the tube. This tubular drill was known in Egypt as early as about 4000 B.C. Within recent years its use has been revived for blasting and quarrying hard rocks. If this tool had not been re-invented the Alpine tunnels would have been practically impossible. The tubular drill was also used by the Greeks for such purposes as hollowing out their alabaster perfume bottles (aka^dcFToi,), and for many other similar processes. For such minute work as gem-engraving the tubular drill was rarely employed, but clear marks of its use are to be seen on some of the archaic Greek lenticular gems, as, for example on one, cut in carnelian, in the British Museum (see fig. 23), which has a pillar-like object, probably a tall fire- altar, between two rampant lions — very much like the relief over the well-known "lion-gate" of the Acropolis of Mycenae. ICallitna- chus. Fig. 23. Early lenticular gem in carnelian, which shows clearly the use of the wheel and of two kinds of drills — the tubular and the solid drill ; real size. Cf. gems in "E(prjiJ.epis, i888 — 9, Plate 10. In this interesting gem (No. io6, Bj-ii. Mus. Cat) the eyes of the lions and the terminations of the pillar are sunk with minute tubular drills. The rest of the work is engraved with the solid drill, and with the little wheel. According to Pausanias (L 26 ad fin) Kallimachus, the inventor of the Corinthian style, was the first to use the drill for stone — \i6ov Koi ra? a(j)pr]ylSa<; yXv(j}ovaL The steatite scarab-signets of Egypt are soft enough to be cut by obsidian or flint. Many arrows tipped with these stones have been found in Upper Egypt, and even in the tombs of Thebes. Most of the details and all the artistic finish of a well engraved gem was given by the use of the diamond-point, which allowed an amount of freedom of touch in the artist's hand far beyond what could be got with any of the other more mechanical tools. It was however much more laborious Flint PTavers. Finish of geins. ^ The modem glazier's diamond is always a. natural crystal; a splintered or cut bit of diamond will readily scratch glass, but would not make the deep slit which is necessary to divide a sheet of glass neatly. 112 DIAMOND-POINT USED FOR GEMS [CHAP. IX. Use of diamond- point. Gems in Brit. Mus. to use it, and required great technical skill on the part of the engraver. By working over and over the same place with the point its scratchy lines could be got rid of, but on some of the gems of finest style and period the artist has not troubled to do this completely, and has left some of the original lines in a way that adds to the spirited beauty of the gem, though at a sacrifice of high finish. This is a point in which the mediaeval or modern forger is specially liable to fail ; he is usually too careful to leave no trace of the actual tool-work. The use of the diamond-point can be clearly traced in one of the most graceful gems in the British Museum (No. 562), which has a figure of a girl dressed in a long chiton, standing and holding a hydria. The lines of the hair, the long straight folds of the drapery, and even the hyd7'-ia in her hand are all executed with the point: thus giving a sort of sketchy look to this very beautiful design, which probably dates from the time of Pheidias^ Fig. 25. Greek gem with a head of Zeus, of very noble style, inscribed E E : the use of the diamond-point in working the hair and beard is very distinct. Head of Zeus. Another very beautiful gem in the British Museum (No. 464) illustrates the use of the diamond-point; see fig. 25. This is a scarab of green jasper from the Blacas collection, with a head of Zeus of most noble style, within a cable border, dating from the first half of the 5th century B.C. The delicate lines cut with the diamond-point are specially visible in the working of the hair and beard of this head. ' Among the Fitzwilliam gems, the use of the point is most visible on Nos. 6, 12 and 19, Plate I. CHAP. IX.J AND THE FILE. 113 See also above, fig. 16 at page 25, in which the hairs of the Satyr's tail are scratched in with the same instrument. Something very similar to the style and touch of gem engravings is to be seen in some of the finest Greek vase paintings of the late black-figured style, dating from the middle or latter part of the 6th century B.C. The inner markings with incised lines on these black figures are in many cases executed with a gem-like delicacy and minuteness ; and it is very probable that the fine lines, sharply and clearly cut through the hard black enamel, were actually executed with the jewel-pointed tool of the glyptic artist. This is specially noticeable in the delicate wavy lines of the hair both of men and animals, and indeed in all the "incised lines of such miniature work as that on Mr Malcolm Macmillan's little vase from Thebes, mentioned above at page 24. Practical experiments on fragments of Greek pottery have convinced the present writer of the great difficulty of producing a perfectly clean line on the hard enamel with any point of metal — even one of hard steel, such as the Greeks did not possess. The diamond-point on the other hand, which was a familiar tool to the ancient Greek, pro- duces the cleanest lines with ease. 4. The file (lima). A very useful tool for smoothing level surfaces on gems, such as the flat field of a signet, was made by a mixture of emery and melted resin' ; when hard this mixture has a very keen cutting power. This is probably the tool that Maecenas alludes to in his letter to Horace — " Ne.c quos Thynica lima perpolivit Anellos, neque jaspios lapillos." Anth. Lat. I. p. 413. As is mentioned above (see page 70) the lima was the tool held by the statue of the bronze sculptor and gem-engraver Theodoros as a symbol of his craft. One form of lima, used for working in metal and also for cutting the softer stones, such as steatite, was probably a file made of iron, not unlike those which are now used. It would 1 The modem method is to mix melted shell-lac and diamond dust. M. 8 Incised lines on vases. Diamond- point. Thefile. 114 TECHNIQUE OF GEMS [CHAP. IX. Ring of Hippias. Method of polishing. Pastegems. however be of no use for working the harder stones, such as those of the quartz class, and still less those of more refractory kind ; see page 157, where a table of the relative hardness of gem-stones is given. Apuleius, in a curious passage near the beginning of the second book of his Florida, mentions the use of the lima and the tornus by the Sophist Hippias, who wore a gold ring set with an engraved gem, entirely the work of his own hands, both stone and setting. 5. The FINAL POLISH. After the sunk design of an en- graved gem was completed, it was necessary, both for the sake of its beauty, and also to prevent the wax or clay of the seal from adhering to it (see Pliny, H. N. XXXVII. 104), to polish, as completely as possible, the internal sunk part. This was done in a laborious way by working the finest powder of some metallic oxide such as haematite, or ochreous earth, into all the depressions of the work with a soft point of wood, a bird's quill, or some other yielding and slightly elastic substance. The flat field of a gem was polished with much greater ease by rubbing it on the surface of woollen stuff sprinkled at first with emery and then finally with the finer powdered ochre. The revolving drum {tympanum) already mentioned was used for this purpose. The TECHNIQUE OF "PASTE" GEMS. Paste, which is only another word for the finest sort of glass, was made with great skill by most classical nations — especially by the Phoe- nicians, the Greeks and the Romans. In splendour of colour, in luminous texture, in hardness and durability, the ancient pastes are very superior to those made in modern times. One reason is that modern pastes or false jewels are largely com- posed of oxide of lead, the object being to increase the " fire'' or lustre of the paste, though at the expense of its hardness and durability. In ancient times, before the modern custom of faceting jewels had been invented, fine deep colour was the first requi- site, and sparkle or lustre was but little regarded*. ' The materials used in making ancient pastes are mentioned below, see page I6.S- CHAP. IX.] AND PASTES. "5 In making a paste signet the process was this — a mould was made from an engraved gem by pressing it against a mixture of clay which had been ground in a mortar, together with a large proportion of finely powdered pottery, till it was a perfectly smooth, plastic and homogeneous mass. The clay mould, with the impression of the original intaglio in relief, was very carefully baked in a potter's kiln, and then a red-hot lump of the glass or paste, in a soft pasty state, was gently pressed upon the mould till it received the complete imprint of the original gem. If done carefully, by a skilful glass-worker, the result was an almost exact facsimile of the original intaglio. When it had cooled, its ragged edges and the rough back were cut smooth and polished by the lapidary's wheel and emery powder, till it was ready for setting in a ring. In the British Museum there is a large colourless paste (No. 1518) with a portrait head of Aristippus, which has never had its edges cut smooth : it is still surrounded by a ragged border, just as it came from the mould'. Among the fine collection of terra-cotta objects from Tarentum, which were presented by Mr A. J. Evans to the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, are included a number of clay moulds for making paste gems. These are simply lumps of clay on which, while soft, an engraved gem has been impressed, giving the device in relief: this relief of course would be again reversed when the soft glass was pressed into the clay mould, thus forming a paste intaglio. Among these moulds are two standing figures of Dionysus, two of a winged Victory writing on a shield, and more than one of Eros. In some cases antique pastes have been made, not by any moulding process, but by using the ordinary tools of the gem- engraver ; treating, that is, the paste exactly as if it had been a real jewel. One of the finest examples of this kind of paste of pastes. Wheel work. Clay moulds. Engraved pastes. ' An account of the making of paste gems is given by Heraclius in his treatise De Artibus Romanorum, written in the 9th century. A M.S. of this work, in the library of Trinity College, Cambridge, was published by Raspe, London, 1783. 8—2 ii6 PASTE INTAGLIOS [CHAP. IX. Paste of Gnaios. Paste Sca- rabaeoids. Foil backing. is No. 621 in the Marlborough collection (Story-Maskelyne's Catalogue, 1870) engraved with a standing figure of an athlete of the Diadumenos type, with the name FNAIOY, probably that of the owner of the gem, partly obliterated by repolish- ing. The quality of this paste, which once belonged to Pope Clement VI 1 1., is so fine that it has usually been described as a jacinth or beryl of exceptional beauty, even by experts such as the gem-engraver Natter. Occasionally a combination of both processes was used, the paste being first cast and then its device worked over and sharpened by the use of tools — a somewhat analogous process to that employed by Greek and Roman moneyers, who fre- quently first cast and then struck coins in high relief Many scarabaeoids of colourless paste, too large for rings, have been found within recent years in Cyprus and elsewhere in Greece. Nos. 8 and 9 in the Fitzwilliam collec- tion are examples of these : the combination of moulding in the device, with cutting on the edges and back, is very obvious in these two pastes. Paste signets {(T