'1 *'l y---fi ,"-V m''> :-?..'.■.", •"!• -,'V'; 'I' ^ " ' s-l-V • '. '^^^•'' V-T!^'tM.d99ighed, to witiisliaaiidr^ttMP -pf, the, ijgj ,9A# ;, a fkir factor of mieij was, provided to allow for the fMare adwB^eiifipljin 'ordSaiil^ The time ,elapso4'J!i«''^eA«er,>S%|e,='Si!S,5^^^ ,hafl«;feje,ea.Bo gi-eat and the - adiraiaCes ia ordnaaee have Ibeek so rapid that maBy of our older ina^ifipes are npf; adequately protected against BMSiera fia-v^l; fifles . In may ea?es,; of course, thjesad^fc tionaLnecessairy. proteetiom-can b« added by excavating e&nd- a,nd'-mt^^fieyr. coiih Crete to the front of the concrete walls', or by placing more sand in front, of lihe^exfcfe; iiig isaiiSi^ioteetion. Usmally, however, thisr can not bj^ done wilihout; to sojme: ext^jit rfe^imeitag the are of fire of ^e 'gii% ■ ,^ ,' : ,^ . , - '" ,• fcny of oiir feSi^eiiesifesalso deficient ia o^^rhgadipfbteQtiom, 'sia^©,, at tijie-jtMie;- tji^j5 were planned, high angle, fiire from naval vfessejswas jaot possible.! It is pasiibliili to add'&e additional iirateetioa by increasing the jeoncrete cover or by the additi^, of iron pjlrt^,; but in very many cases the addition «f this new pi'ateetion dan but result in the reduction of the available field of fire of <3ie gun. : i i from 4'to,^ peree&t of .our«tapla0jaenitSj ;' • 1 • >• •' r ;i..;: , ■ ,At psesenit, aaihasrheeaphosnti theje}afB»no emjrfajpements., on our Atlantic, aitdfgnuM-'. Q^pufejs^iidjonly two om tto Jaiciflc j|0flst|:that weie. not desiggf^di.more than 10 yeaas. -ago. " ^dnseqiiently, to enable vps to 'catch up as it werOj eiflaplaceMent cottstruclaQ^ must for the next few yiea^s be capied on at a greater rate even tlfan wolild be required 21 by the percentage just stated. The Chief of Engineers considers it his duty, therefore, to urge that appropriations be made for emplacing each year for the next 10 years or 80 an average of not less than 8 major-caliber guns and 24 seacoast mortals. In order to emphasize this mattef, the Chief of Engineers, in his annual report submitted in the summer of 1915, inserted the following: When designed and constructed our seacoast batteries were thoroughly modem and fuUy adequate for the purpose for which they were intended, but the work o f battery construction has in the past few years been allowed to practically cease and has not kept pace with the recent progress in naval development. It can not be too emphatically stated that the art of fortification is a progressive one. It must continually grow to keep pace with the new discoveries which give it special advantages or to meet and offset progre^ in the development of naval vessels and armament against which the forts are expected to contend. However carefully planned and constructed, a battery must always pertain to the date when completed and must be out of date in so far as relates to things which have been discovered or developed since the batter}' was planned. Seacoast defenses are designed to fight naval vessels and to thus protect certain cities, harbors, or other utilities from bombardment by an enemy's vessels within any of the area covered bj' the seacoast guns. In locating and designing batteries the range and power of the naval guns, as well as the number of such guns which can be brought against these fortifications, must be given consideration, and, unless our fortifications are to become obsolete, changes in any of the elements of na\ral offense must be met by corresponding changes in seacoast batteries, and these changes must in most cases consist not merely of modifjdng the older emplacements by affording additional protection for the gun platforms and magazines against the increased power of naval guns, or in mounting more powerful guns in these older emplacements, but rather in the construction of absolutely new batteries in new locations. The older batteries were necessarily designed and located so as to obtain the maxdmum effect with guns of the range of those to be mounted in those emplacements. If the guns which were to be mounted in those older batteries had been of loiter range, the locations of the batteries would in many cases have been different, and if more power- ful and longer range guns be mounted in those older batteries a large proportion of this increased power and range wiE in most cases be lost. For the above reasons it should be noted that a fixed project for seacoast defenses can never be adequate, and its obsolescence must begin before it can be completed. For the first few years after the report of the Taft board was sub- mitted, seacoast construction in this country, in general, was restricted to the completion of batteries previously begun, or to the installa- tion of fire-control and other accessories. The new batteries that were begun were mainly in our tropical possessions and in the Panama Canal Zone. About 1912, however, battery construction was resumed in the United States, principally on the Pacific coast, and studies were made of the work covered by the Taft board project for the defense of the entrance to Chesapeake Bay. In its report submitted in the autumn of 1914 upon the project for the defense of the entrance to Chesapeake Bay, the special board . which had been oi^anized to consider the matter invited the atten- tion of the War Department to recent developments in seacoast 22 defense which appeared to make desirable a revision of all seacoast defense projects. About the same time the Chief of Engineers sub- mitted the paper on obsolescence quoted above. His attention having been thus called to the matter, the Secretary of W&T decided to organize ia the War Department an agency known as the War Department Board of Eeview for the revision of seacoast defense projects. This board consisted of the Chief of Staff and his principal assistant, and of the Chief of Engineers, Chief of Ordnance, Chief of Coast Artillery, and the president of the War CoUege. It at once commenced a study of all the projects for seacoast defense of the United States and, within about a year, submitted its recom- mendations as to the modifications which it thought should be made in these projects. In a number of cases no additional emplacements were recom- mended, but in the more important defenses important modifications were reported as being necessary. In the meantime the 16-iQch rifle had been developed by the Ordnance Department and was recommended for installation as the primary gun in the new fortifi- cations, to be mounted generally on disappearing carriages providing for an elevation up to 30°. The 16-inch mortar was recommended as the standard mortar, to be emplaced ia batteries of the same general type of the Panama Canal mortar batteries. It having been brought 16 the attention of the board of review that there were on hand and not in use a number of 12-iach guns which had been manufactured by the Ordnance Department as "spares" to take the place of the standard 12-inch guns which had been installed in our seacoast defenses, as these guns wore out, and since it was probable that they would not be used for this purpose, the board of review recommended that these guns be emplaced immediately, 24 in the United States and 12 in the insular possessions, and ia order to give these guns the maximum range possible, it was recommended that they be mouated on barbette carriages, permitting an elevation of from 30° to 35°. The recommendations of the board of review as to the construction of 12-inch long-range emplacements have been carried out, but work on its other projects has not as yet been begun, although the Ordnance Department has done some work on the construction of the 16-inch guns and carriages. The reason for this is, that before work could be begun, the United States became involved in the recent war and during the war the efforts of the Ordnance and Engineer Depart- ments were devoted to work immediately connected with the war, consequently it was not until about the time of the armistice that it was possible, without neglecting war work, to devote attention again to the seacoast-defense situation. 23 In the meantime, in connection with land operations abroad, there had been a rapid development of large-caHber railroad artillery and the War Department has referred to a committee of the General Staff the consideration of the question as to the effect that this development should properly have upon seacoast projects — that is, to what extent in the future our seacoast guns should be mounted on railroad cars and to what extent permanent emplacements should be built. Pending the receipt of the report of this committee, the work of designing seacoast emplacements has been temporarily suspended. Chapter II. ADMINISTRATION. The duties of the Corps of Engmeers of the Army are prescribed in certain paragraphs of Army Regulations with which aU Engineer officers should be familiar. These paragraphs, however, are subject to amendment and are in fact frequently amended. Therefore, no attempt will be made to quote them here. Among the duties of the Corps of Engineers as laid down by Army Regulations are the design and construction of permanent fortifi- cations. In this country but few attempts have been made at the construction of permanent fortifications, except on our sea and lake shores and on the coasts of our insular possessions consequently so much -of the duties of the Corps of Engineers as pertain to permanent fortifications have been performed almost exclusively in connection with coast fortifications. The work of the Engineer Department is carried on under the com- mand and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, who is assisted by certain officers and civilian employees in his office. The construc- tion work is in charge of the district Engineer officers who are sta- tioned in various places conveniently located with respect to the work. In order that this work may be properly coordinated and supervised, the Engineer districts are united into a number of groups called Engineer divisions which are imder the supervision and general control of senior officers called division Engineers. In connection with the fortification work, the Chief of Engineers receives assistance, especially in the way of advice, from the Board of Engineers, or, as it is sometimes called, the "Board of Engineers for Fortifications." This board consists normally of three Engineer officers of high rank who have had considerable experience in forti- fication matters, and, in addition, of a younger officer detailed as recorder of the board. As was noted in the Chapter I, on historical matters, the Board of Engineers is a very ancient organization, dating back to about 1816. At one time the seat of the board was in Washington, later it was moved to New York City, where it is now. In addition to the Engineer officers, who are regularly members of the board. Ordnance officers or officers of the Coast Artillery have occasionally been detailed on the board. (25) 26 The principal duties of the Board of Engineers as laid down by Engineer Department Regulations, which have remained practically unchanged for many years, are as foUows: There shall be Board of Engineers whose duty it shall be to revise, as may be di- rected by the Chief of Engineers, from time to time, projects of permanent fortifi- cations required for the defense of the territory of the United States, and works of river and harbor improvement; also to consider and to report upon such other matters as may be referred to it by the Chief of Engineers. It shall be the duty of the mem,bers of the bdard, whenever required by the Chief of Engineers, to inspect and report upon any of the works of construction or other of the operations of the Engineer Department, the inepection reports to be made to the board and by it submitted to the Chief of Engineers, with such remarks as it may deem proper. The board shall consist of not less than three officers to be designated by the Chief of Engineers, with the sanction of the Secretary of War. As will be seen from the above quotation, the functions of the Board of Engineers were formerly quite broad, and it was their duty when caUed upon to do so, to formulate a general project for the de- fense of any harbor, or to modify, existing defense projects. In con- sidering such a fortification project, it was their duty; to decide upon the general character of the defense to be provided; to fix upon the number of guns of different cahbers which should be emplaced, and to select the locations for the emplacements; to make general designs for the emplacements themselves; to decide if a submarine mine defense was necessary and the character of the defense; to fix upon the number of searchhghts needed, their location, etc. The recom- mendations of the board were made to the Chief of Engineers, and were forwarded by him to the Secretary of War. When approved by the Secretary of War they became the "approved project" for the defense of that locality. In recent years, however, that is to say, since the organization of the General Staff, and the enactment of legislation providing for a Coast' Artillery Corps and a Chief of Coast Artillery, who is ex officio a member of the General Staff, the duties of making or revising coast defense projects have devolved upon certain sections of the General Staff or upon special War Department boards formed for the pur- pose. Consequently, the Board of Engineers, in connection with seacoast defense, has no longer the important functions that it for- merly had. However, there still devolves upon it the preparation of typical plans for seacoast defense structures. The plans of the Board of Engineers are usually pubhshed to the Engineer Department in the form of Engineer Department mimeo- graphs. Though not strictly confidential in the true sense of the word "confidential," access to the mimeographs is supposed to be restricted to the officers of the corps, or to other persons whose duties require it. 27 In the case of minor structures the mimeographs are usually quite simple, but when they relate to more extensive works, such as typical emplacements for large guns, they go into considerable detail and consist of a text and of a number of drawings. These show, not only the general outlay of the emplacements or other structures, with