®0mrfl Uttirmitg ^ilrmg THE GIFT OF c/f. ^3:rr!JU^isJtl J^-zi^Qv^.. ^.pJ?.Lsxffit 7«73-I DC 135.L63'l903"""'' '""'"^ '■**iliJ?iiiS!iiiM!!S,-.„i!.? Lespinasse,with note 3 1924 024 296 992 The original of tliis bool< is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024296992 LETTERS OF MLLE. DE LESPINASSE .(■AV'j-r-- MlLE. JhLIB PB liESPINASSE LETTERS OF MLLE. DE tESPINASSE Wiitii Wotesi, on jjer Mle anU ffil)atBcter BY D'ALEMBERT, MARMONTEL, DE GUIBERT, Etc. AND ■ AN INTRODUCTION BY C.-A. SAINTE-BEUVE TRANSLATED BY KATHARINE PRESCOTT WORMELEY. BOSTON: HARDY, PRATT & COMPANY. 1903 Copyright 1901, By HAkdy, Pra-ft & Company. Ail rights reserved. !Entber8itg |9ress: John Wilson and Son, Cambridge, U. S. A. CONTENTS. Page Introduction. By C.-A. Saintk-Beuve 1 Notes on the IjIpe and Character of Mlle. de Lespi- NASSB. By Grimm, Marmontel, La Harpe, etc. . . 21 Letters from Mlle. de Lkspinassb to M. de Guibert . 42 Portrait of Julie-Jeannk-Elj^onore de Lespinasse. By D'Alembert ... 299 Eulogy of Eliza. By M. de Guibert 310 To the Manes of Mlle. de Lespinasse. By D'Alembert 326 Letters from Frederick the Great, King of Prussia, Voltaire, and D'Alembert, on the Death of Mlle. DE Lespinasse . 332 INTRODUCTION. By C.-A. SAINTE-BEUVE. The claims of Mile, de Lespinasse to the attention of poster- ity are positive and durable. At the moment of her death she was universally regretted, as having, without name, without fortune, without beauty, created for herself the salon most in vogue, most eagerly frequented at an epoch which counted so many that were brilliant. StiU, this flattering chorus of regrets given to the memory of the friend of d'Alembert would have left but a vague and presently receding idea of her, if the publication of her Letters, made in 1809, had not revealed her under an aspect wholly different, and shown, no Idnger the charming person dear to society, but the woman of heart and passion, the burning and self -consuming victim. This volume of Letters from Mile, de Lespinasse to the Comte de Guibert is one of the most curious and most memorable monuments to passion. Li 1820 another volume, under the title of " Nouveaux Lettres de Mile, de Lespinasse," was published, which is not hers ; it is unworthy of her mind and of her heart; being as flat and insipid as the other is distinguished, or, to say it better, ujnique. I beg my read- ers not to confound that volume of 1820 (a speculation and fabrication of publishers) with the Letters given to the world in 1809, the only ones that deserve confidence, and of which I desire to speak. These love-letters, addressed to M. de Guibert, were pub- lished by the widow of M. de Guibert, assisted in the work 1 2 INTRODUCTION. by Barrfere, the Barrfere of the Terror, neither more nor less, who, as we know, loved literature, especially that of senti- ment. When the Letters appeared there was great emotion in society, several of the friends of MUe. de Lespinasse being stUl alive at that date. They deplored the indiscreet publi- cation ; they blamed the conduct of the editors, who thus dishonoured, they said, the memory of a woman imtil then respected, and betrayed her secret to all, without the right to do so. They appealed to both morality and decency ; they invoked the very fame of Mile, de Lespinasse. Nevertheless, they eagerly enjoyed the reading of the Letters, which far sur- passed in interest the most ardent romances, being, in truth, a " Nouvelle H^loise " in action. To-day posterity, indifferent . to personal considerations, sees only the book, and classes it in the series of immortal paintings and testimonies of passion, of which there is not so great a number that we caimot count them. Antiquity gives us Sappho for certatu accents, certain sighs of fire that come to us athwart the ages ; it has given us the " Phsedra " of Euripides, the " Magician " of Theocritus, the " Medea " of Apollonius of Ehodes, the " Dido " of Virgil, the "Ariadne" of Catullus. Among modems we have the Latin Letters of H^loise, those of the Portuguese nun, " Manon Lescaut," the " Phfedre " of Eacine, and a few other rare pro-' ductions, among which the Letters of MUe. de Lespinasse are in the first rank. Oh ! if the late Barrfere had never done worse in his life than publish these Letters, if he had had no greater burden on his conscience we would say to-day, absolv- ing him with aU our heart, " May the earth lie light upon him!" Here is an anecdote which I possess from the original. At the time when these Letters appeared, a brOliant society had gathered at the baths of Aix in Savoie. Some of the party had gone to visit Oham^b^ry ; on their return one of the INTEODUCTION. B carriages was occupied by Mme. de Staf5l, Benjamin Constant, Mme. de Boigne, Adrien de Montmorency, etc. During the drive a series of accidents occurred — tempest, thunder and lightniug, hindrances and delays of all kinds. On arriving at Aix the persons in the carriage found the people of the hotel grouped at the dooj, very anzious and inquiring. But they, the travellers, had seen nothing, and noticed nothing of the accidents without, for Mme. de Stael had talked the whole time, and her topic was the Letters of Mile, de Lespi- nasse and M. de Guibert, who had been her own first lover. The life of Mile, de Lespinasse began early in being a romance, and more than a romance. She was the natural daughter of the Comtesse d'Albon, a lady of condition in Burgundy, whose legitimate daughter had married the brother of the Marquise du Deffand. It was at the house of this brother, the Marquis de Vichy-Chamrond, in Burgundy, that Mme. du Deffand found the young girl, then twenty years of age, oppressed, assigned to inferior domestic duties, and kept in a condition that was wholly dependent. She took a fancy to her at once ; or rather, they took a fancy to each other, and we can readily conceive it ; if we look only to the value of minds, it is seldom that chance brings together two more distinguished. Mme. du Deffand had no peace until she had drawn the young girl from her province and installed her with herself at the convent of Saint-Joseph, as her companion and reader, intending to make of her a perpetual resource. The family of the young girl's mother had, however, a strong fear, namely : that she might profit by her new position and the protectors she would find in society to claim the name of Albon and- her share of the inheritance. She might have done so, in fact ; for she was born during the lifetime of M. d'Albon, the husband of her mother, and the law recognizes 4 INTRODUCTION. all such children as legitimate. Mme. du Deffand thought it right to take precautions, and dictated to her, with little deli- cacy, certain conditions on this point before permitting her to come to her; for one who appreciated so well "the young girl's mind it was knowing very little of her heart. This arrangement of a life in common was made in 1754, and it lasted tUl 1764 : ten years of household companion- ship and concord ; a long period, longer than could have been hoped between two minds so equal in quality and associated with elements so impetuous. But finally, Mme. du Deffand, who rose late and was never afoot before six in the evening, discovered that her young companion was receiving in her private room, a good hour earlier, most of her own habitual visitors, thus taking for herself the first-fruits of their con- versation. Mme. du Deffand felt herself defrauded of her most cherished rights, and uttered loud outcries, as if it were a matter of domestic robbery. The storm was terrible, and could only end in a rupture. Mile, de Lespinasse left the convent of Saint-Joseph abruptly; her friends clubbed to- gether to make her a salon and a subsistence in the rue de Belle-Chasse. These friends were d'Alembert, Turgot, the Chevalier de . Chastellux, Lom^nie de Brienne, the future archbishop and cardinal, Boisgelin, Archbishop of Aix, the Abb^ de Boismont, — in short, the flower of the minds of that . day. This brilliant colony followed the emigrant spirit and her fortimes. From that moment Mile, de Lespinasse lived apart and became, through her salon and through her influ- ence on d'Alembert, one of the recognized powers of the eighteenth century. Happy days ! when all life turned to sociability ; when all was arranged for the gentlest commerce of minds and for the best conversation. Not a vacant day, not a vacant hour ! If you were a man of letters and more or less of a philosopher. INTRODUCTION. 5 here is the regular employment you could make of your week : Sunday and Thursday, dinner with Baron d'Holbach ; Mon- day and Wednesday, dinner with Mme. Geoffrin ; Tuesday, dinner with M. Helv^tius ; Friday, dinner with Mme. Necker. I do not mention the Sunday breakfasts of the Abb^ Morellet ; those, I think, came a little later. Mile, de Lespinasse, hav- ing no means to give diniiers and suppers, was punctually at home from five to nine o'clock, and her circle assembled every day during those hours of the " early evening." What she was as mistress of her salon and as a bond of society before, and even after, the invasion and delirium of her fatal passion, all the Memoirs of the time will teU us. She was much attached to d'Alembert, illegitimate like her- self, who (like herself -again) had proudly forborne to seek for rights which tenderness had failed to give him. D'Alem' bert was then lodging with his foster-mother, the worthy wife of a glazier, in the rue Michel-le-Comte, which 'was far from the rue de Belle-Chasse. A serious illness seized him, during which Mile, de Lespinasse took care of him, induced the doctors to order him to live in better air, and finally decided him to come to her. From that day they made one household, but in all honour and propriety, so that no one ever gossiped to the contrary. D'Alembert's life became much easier, and the respect paid to Mile, de Lespinasse was thereby increased. Mile, de Lespinasse was not pretty; but through mind, through grace, through the gift of pleasing. Nature had amply compensated her. From the first day when she came to Paris she seemed as much at her ease and as little provincial as if she had lived here all her life. She profited by the edu- cation of the excellent society that surrounded her, although she had little need to do so. Her great art in social life, one of the secrets of her success, was to feel the minds of others, 6 INTRODUCTION. to make them shine, and to seem to forget herself. Her con- versation was neither above nor below those with whom she talked ; she had the sense of measurement, proportion, accu- racy. ,She reflected so well the impressions of others, and received so visibly the effect of their minds, that others loved her for the success they felt they had with her. She raised this method to an art. " Ah ! how I wish," she exclaimed one day, " that I knew everybody's weakness." D'Alembert fastened on the words and blamed them, as proceeding from too great a desire to please, and to please every one. But even in that desire, and in the means it suggested to her she re- mained true, she was sincere. She said of herself, in expla- nation of her success with others that she held the " truth of all [le vrai de touf], while other women held the truth of nothing \le vrai de rien]." In conversing she had the gift of the right word, the instinct for the exact and choicest expression; common and trivial expressions disgusted her ; she was shocked, and could not recover herself. She was not precisely simple, though very natural. It was the same with her clothes. " She gave," some one said, " an idea of richness which by taste and choice was vowed to simplicity." Her literary taste was more lively [^vif] than sure ; she loved, she adored Eacine, as master of the heart, but for all that she did not like the over-finished, she preferred the rough and sketchy. Whatever caught her by an inward fibre excited and uplifted her ; she could even have mercy on a worthless book for one or two situations in it which went to her soul. She has imitated Sterne in a couple of chapters which are worth little. As a writer, where she does not dream of being one, that is to say in her Letters, her pen is clear, firm, excellent, except for a few words such as sensitive, virtuous, which are repeated too often, and show the influence of Jean-Jacques. INTRODUCTION. 7 But never any commonplaceness, never declamation; all is from the living spring, from nature. Let us come at once to her principal claim, to her glory of loving woman. In spite of her tender friendship for d'Alembert, a friendship which was doubtless a little more at its origin, we may say that Mile, de Lespinasse loved but twice in her life : she loved M. de Mora and M. de Guibert. It is the struggle of these two passions, the one expiring but powerful still, the other whelming-in and soon to be paramount, it is this viotent and desperate combat which constitutes the heart-rending drama to which the publication of these Letters initiates us. The contemporaries of Mile, de Lespinasse, her nearest and best informed friends knew nothing of it. Condorcet, writing to Turgot, often speaks of her and tells him of her nervous a,ttacks, but without appear- ing to suspect their cause; those who, like Marmontel, divined some trouble, were wholly on the wrong scent as to d^tes and sentiments. D'Alembert himself, so concerned in seeing clearly, knew the mystery only on reading certain papers after her death. Therefore we must seek the truth as to the secret sentiments of Mile, de Lespinasse from her own avowals, from herself alone. She had loved M. de Mora for five or six years, when she met for the first time M. de Guibert. The Marquis de Mora was the son of the Comte de Fuentfes, ambassador from Spain to the Coxirt of Trance. AU things prove that, although still young, he was a man of superior merit and destined to a great future had he lived. As to this, we have not only the assurance of Mile, de Lespinasse, but that of others least subject to infatuation among his contempo- raries ; the Abb^ Galiani, for instance, learning in Kaples of his death, writes to Mme. d'Epinay (June 18, 1774): "I dare not Speak of Mora. I have mourned h\m long. All is 8 INTRODUCTION. destined iii this world, and Spain was not worthy to possess a M. de Mora." And again (July 8th) : " There are lives on which depend the fate of empires. Hannibal, when he heard of the defeat and death of his brother Hasdrubal, a man of greater worth than himself, did not weep, but he said, ' Now I know what will be the fate of Carthage.' I say the same on the death of M. "de Mora." M. de Mora came to France about the year 1766 ; it was then that Mile, de Lespinasse knew him and loved him. He was absent at various times, Taut always returned to her. Finally, his limgs were attacked and his native climate was ordered for him. He left Paris, never to re-enter it, on Friday, August 7, 1772. Mile, de Lespinasse, philosopher and freethinker none the less, was on one point as supersti- tious as any Spanish woman, as any loving woman; and she did not fail to note that having quitted Paris on a Friday, it was on a Friday also that he left Madrid (May 6, 1774), and that he died at Bordeaux on Friday, the 27th of the same month. When he left Paris the passion of Mile, de Les- pinasse for him and that which he returned to her had never been more ardent. An idea of it may be gained from the fact that during a journey which M. de Mora made to Fontainebleau in the autumn of 1771 he wrote twenty-two letters to her in ten days of absence. Matters were estab- lished on this tone, and the pair had parted with every promise and every pledge between them, when Mile, de Les- pinasse, in the month of September, 1772, met the Comte de Guibert for the first time, at MouHn-Joli, the country- house of M. Watelet. I M. de Guibert, then about twenty-nine years of age, was a yoimg colonel for whom society had lately roused itself to a pitch of enthusiasm. He had recently published an " Essay on Tactics," preceded by a survey of the state of political and INTRODUCTION. 9 military science in Europe. In it were generous, or as we should say in these days, advanced ideas. He discussed the great Erederick's system of war. He competed at the Acade- my on subjects of patriotic eulogy ; he had tragedies in his desk on national subjects: " He aims at nothing less," said La Harpe, " than replacing Turenne, Comeille, and Bossuet." It would be very easy at this date, but not very just, to make a caricature of M. de Guibert, a man whom every one, begin- ning with Voltaire, considered at his dawn as vowed to glory and grandeur, and who kept the pledge so insuf&ciently. Abortive hero of that epoch of Louis XVI. which gave France naught but promises, M. de Guibert entered the world, his head high and on the footing of a genius ; it was, so to speak, his speciality to have genius, and you will not find a writer of his day who does not use the word in rela- tion to him. " A soul," they cried, " which sprhigs on aU sides towards fame." iThis was an attitude difficult to maintain, and the fall, at last, was all the more bitter to him. Let us admit, however, that a man who could be loved to such a point by Mile, de Lespinasse, and who, subsequently, had the honour of first occupying the heart of Mme. de StaSl, must have had those eager, animated qualities which belong to personality, and mislead the judgment as to deeds so long as their father is present. M. de Guibert had the qualities that exhilarate, excite, and impress ; he had his full value in a brilliant cir- cle ; but he chiUed quickly and was out of place in the bosom of intimacy. In the order of sentiments he had the emotion, the tumult, the diu of passion, but not its warmth. Mile, de Lespinasse, who ended by judging him as he was and by estimating his just weight - without being able to cease loving him, began, in the first instance, by admiration. " Love," it is said, " begins usually by admiration, and it sur- lb INTRODUCTION. vives esteem with difficulty, or rather, it does not survive it, except in prolongiag its existence by convulsions." Here, iu her, is the history of that fatal passion; the degrees of which were so rapid that we can scarcely distinguish them. She was then (must we tell it ?) nearly -forty years old. She was bitterly regretting the departure of M. de Mora — that true man of delicacy and feeling, that truly superior man — when she involved herself in loving M. de Guibert, the false great man, but who was present and seductive. Her first letter is dated Saturday evening. May 15, 1773. M. de Gui- bert was about to start on a long journey through Germany^ Prussia, and, possibly, Eussia. We have his own printed " Kelation " of this journey, and it is curious to put these witty, practical, often instructive and sometimes emphatic and sentimental notes side by side with the letters of his ardent friend. Before he departs he has already done her some wrong. He had said he would leave Tuesday, May 18th, then Wednesday, but he did not start till Thursday, the 20th, and his friend knew nothing of it. It is evident that she was not the one to receive his last thought, his last farewell She suffers already, and blames herself for suffering ; she has just received a letter from M. de Mora, full of confidence in her love ; she is ready to sacrifice everything, to him, "but," she adds, " for the last two months I have had no sacrifice to make to him." She thinks she still loves M. de Mora ; that she can stop and immolate at will the new feeling which de- taches and drags her away from him. M. de Mora absent, illj faithful, writes to her, and each letter reopens her wound and quickens her remorse. What will it be when, returning to her, he falls ill and dies on his way at Bordeaux ? Thus, until the end, we find her torn in her delirium between the need, the desire to die for M. de Mora, and the desire to live for M. de Guibert. " Do you conceive, mon dmi, the species INTRODUCTION. 11 of torture to which I am condemned ? I have remorse for what I give you, and regrets for what I am forced to with- hold." But this is only the beginning of it all.^ M. de Guibert, who is much in vogue, and something of a coxcomb, leaves behind him; when he goes upon Ms journey, more than one regret. We find there are two women, one whom he loves, who responds but little, the other who loves him, but does not occupy him much. Mile, de Lespinasse takes an interest in these persons, in one especially, and she tries to glide between the two. But what of that ? when the heart loves utterly it is not proud, and she tells herself, with P^lix in " Polyeucte," — " I enter upon feelings that are not believaUe; Some I have are violent, others are pitiable, I have even some . . ." She dares not conclude with Corneille, " some that are base." She asks to be given a place apart, for herself ; she does not yet know what place. " Let us decide our ranks" she says. " Give me my place, but, as I do not like to change, give me a good one. I do not wish that of this unhappy woman, who is displeased with you ; nor that of the other, with whom you are displeased. I do- not know where you will place me, but do so, if possible, that we may both be content : do not bargain ; grant me much ; you shall see that I ' will not abuse it. Oh ! you shall see that I know how to love ! I can but love, I know only how to love." Here begins the eternal note, and it never ceases. To love 1 The Letters are addressed throughout to " mon ami," which cannot here be translated as " my friend : " the consonants themselres forbid it, also the limited meaning of the English word in its general use. Conse- quently, the soft French word, with more love in it, is retained in the following translation. — Tb. 12 INTRODUCTION. — that is her lot. Phaedra, Sappho, and Dido had none more complete, more fatal. She deceives herself when she says : " I have a strength, or a faculty, which makes me equal to everything : it is that of knowing how to suffer, and to suffer much without complaint." She knows how to suffer, but she does complain, she cries aloud, she passes in the twinkling of an eye from exaltation to dejection : " What shall I say to you ? the excess of my inconsistency bewUders my mind, and the weight of life is crushing my soul. What must I do ? What shall I become ? Will it be Charenton or the grave that shall deliver me from myself ? " She counts the letters she receives ; her life depends on the postman : " There is a certain carrier who for the last year gives fever to my soul." To calm herself whUe waiting and expectiag, to obtain the sleep that flees her, she finds nothing better than recourse to opium, of which we find her doubling the doses with the progress of her woe. What matters to her the destiny of other women, those women of society, who " for the most part feel no need of being loved ; all they want is to be preferred " ? As for her, what she wants is to be loved, or rather, to love, even without return : " You do not know all that I am worth ; reflect that I can suffer and die ; judge from that if I resemble those other women, who know how to please and amuse." In vain does she cry out now and then : " Oh ! I hate you for giving me the knowledge of hope, fear, pain, pleasure ; I did not need those emotions ; why did you not leave me in peace ? My soul had no need to love ; it was filled by a tender sentiment, deep, and shared, responded to, though sorrowful in parting. It was the impul- sion of that sorrow that took me to you ; I meant that you should please me only, but you did more ; in consoling me you bound me to you." In vain does she curse the violent feeling which ha? taken the place of an equable and gentler DSTEODUCTION. 13 sentiment ; her soul is so grasped, so ardent that she cannot keep from transports, as it were, of intoxication : " I live, I exist with such force that there are moments when I find myself loving to madness and to my own misery." So long as M. de Guibert is absent she restrains herself a little — if it can be called restraint. He returns, however, at the end of October, 1773, after being distinguished by the great Frederick and taking part in the manoeuvres of the camp in Silesia ; thus acquiring a fresh resplendency. Here, with a little attention, it is impossible not to note a decisive moment, a moment we must veil, which corresponds to that of the grotto in Dido's episode. ^ A year later, in a letter from Mile, de Lespiaasse dated midnight (1775) we find these words, which leave but little room for doubt : " It was on the 10th of February of last year (1774) that I was intoxicated by a poison the effect of which lasts to this day. . . ." She continues this delirious and doleful commemoration, in which the^image, the spectre, of M. de Mora, dying on his way to her, mingles with the nearer and more charming image which wraps her in a fatal attraction. From this moment passion is at its height, and there is scarcely a page in. the Letters that is not all flame. Scrupu- lous persons, though they read and relish them, blame M. de Guibert severely for not having returned them to Mile, de Lespinasse, who frequently asked for them. It appears, in ' Her letters do not seem to bear out this conclusion. The close intimacy with the personality of a writer that comes, in the work of translation, from the necessary scrutiny of his or her' words and thoughts and habitual method of expressing them gives — to the translator at least — ground for doubting this opinion. It may be true; but a Frenchman's mind, even that of Sainte-Beuve, seems unable to escape from this line of judgment. If it is not true, the soul's tragedy is far greater. Mile, de Lespinasse uses plain, clear language, which reveals the passion of her nature simply ; when she speaks of " remorse " for her infidelity to M. de Mora, she is ex- pressing the extreme, perhaps excessive, honour, delicacy, and seusitiveness of her spirit. — Tr. 14 INTRODUCTION, fact, that order and attention were not 'among the number of M. de Guibert's good qualities ; he takes no care of his friend's letters : he mingles them with his other papers, he drops them from his pocket by mistake, while at the same time he forgets to seal his own. Sometimes he returns them to her, but among the number returned some are not hers ! In that we see M. de Guibert undisguised. Nevertheless, I do not know why he should be held responsible and guilty to-day for the pleasure we derive from these Letters. He doubtless returned many, and many were destroyed. But Mile, de Lespinasse wrote many. It is but a handful, preserved by chance, which have come to us. What matter ? the thread of the story is there, and it suffices. Throughout, they are almost one and the same letter, ever novel, ever unexpected, beginning afresh. Amid their anguish, their plaints, one word, the divine eternal word, returns again and again and redeems all. Here is one of her letters in two lines which says more than many words : — "From every instant of my life, 1774. "Mon ami, — I suffer, I love you, I await you." It is very rare in France to meet (pushed to this degree) with the class of passion and " sacred ill " of which Mile, de Lespinasse was the victim. This is not a reproach that I make — God forbid ! — to the amiable women of our nation ; it is a simple remark, which others have made before me. A moralist of the eighteenth century who knew his times, M. de Meilhan, has said, " In France, great passions are as rare as great men." M. de Mora declared that even the Spanish women could not enter into comparison with his friend. " Oh ! they are not worthy to be your pupils," he tells her constantly ; " your soul was warmed by the sun of Lima, but INTRODUCTION. 15 my compatriots seem born beneath the snows of Lapland." And it was from Madrid that he wrote it ! He found her comparable to none but a Peruvian, daughter of the Sun. " To love and suffer," she cries, " Heaven or HeU ; to that I would vow myself; it is that I would feel; that is the climate I desire to inhabit ; " and she pities the women who live and vegetate in a milder air and flirt their fans around her. "I have known only the climate of Hell, rarely that of Heaven." "Ah ! my God!" she says again, " how natural passion is to me, and how foreign is reason ! Mon ami, never did any one reveal herself with such abandonment." It is this abandonment, this total unre- serve which is the interest and the excuse of the mental situation, the sincerest and the most deplorable that ever betrayed itself to the eye. This situation of soul is so visibly deplorable that we may look upon it, I think, without danger ; so iaherent is the sense of malady, so plainly do delirium, frenzy, agony disclose them- selve's pell-mell. While admiring a nature capable of this powerful manner of feeling, we are tempted as we read to pray that Heaven would turn from us and from those we love so invincible a fatality, so terrible a thunderbolt. I shall try to note the course of this passion, as much, at least, as it is possible to note down that which was irregularity and contradiction itself. Before the journey of M. de Guibert to Germany, MUe. de Lespinasse loved him, but had not yielded to her love. She admired him, she was iilled with enthusiasm, already she suffered cruelly and made poison of everything. He returns, she intoxicates herself, she yields ; then follows remorse ; she judges him correctly ; she sees with terror his indifference ; she sees him as he is — a man of flourish, of vanity, of suc- cess ; not a man for intimacy, having, above all, a need for 16 INTEODUCTION. expansion; excited, animated by things from v?ith.out, but never deeply emotional. But of what use is it to become clear-sighted? Did a woman's mind, great as it may be, ever check her heart ? " The mind of most women serves to strengthen their folly rather than their reason ! " ta Eochef oucauld says that, and MUe. de Lespinasse proves the truth of it. She continued to love M. de Guibert, all the while judging him. She suffers more and more ; she appeals to him and chides him with a mixture of irritation and tenderness : " Fill my soul, or cease to torture it ; make me to love you always, or to be as though I had never loved you — in short, do the impossible; calm me, or I die!" -Instead' of that, he harms her ; with his natural careless- ness he finds a way to wound even her self-love. She compares him to' M. de Mora ; she blushes for him, for herself, at the difference between them: "And it is you who have made me guilty towards that man ! the thought revolts my soul, ,;, and I turn away from it." Eepentance, hatred, jealousyj re- morse, contempt of herself, and sometimes of him — she suf- fers at all moments the tortures of the damned. To deaden , them, to distract her miud, to make truce with her sufiferings, | she has recourse to many things. She tries " Tancrfede," which touches her ; she thinks it beautiful, but nothing i^i on the key of her own soul. She has recourse to opium to suspend her life and numb her sensibilities. Sometimes she makes a resolution to no longer open the letters she receives; she keeps one, sealed, for six days. There are days, weeks, when she thinks herself almost cured, re- stored to reason, to calmness; she extols reason and its sweetness ; but her calmness is merely an Ulusion. Her passion counterfeited death only to revive more ardent, more inflamed than ever. She regrets no longer her de- INTRODUCTION.. 17 ceitful, insipid calmness. " I lived," she says, " but I seemed to be apart from myself." She tells M. de Guibert that she hates him, but we know what that means : " You know well that when I hate you it is that I love you to a degree of pas- sion that overthrows my reason." Her life is thus passed in loving, hating, fainting, reviving, dying ; that is to say, in ever loving. Each crisis ends by a" pardon, a reconciliation, a closer and more violent clasp. M. de Guibert thinks of hia fortune and his establishment ; she concerns herself with them for his sake. Yes, she con- cerns herself about his marriage. When he marries (for he has the face to marry in the very midst of this passion) she takes an interest in it ; she praises the young wife, whom she meets. Alas ! it may be to that generous praise that we owe the preservation of these Letters, which ought in those rival hands to have been aimihilated. It might be supposed that this marriage of M. de Guibert would end all ; the noble, de- mented soiil thinks so herself ; but no ! passion laughs at social impossibilities and. barriers. She continues, therefore, in spite of all, to love M. de Guibert, without asking more of him than to let himself be loved. After many struggles, the last day finds their mtercourse restored as though nothing had been broken between them. But she feels her- self dying ; she redoubles the use of opium ; she desires to live only from day to day, without a future — has passion a future ? " I feel the need of being loved to-day, and only to- day; let us blot from our dictionary the words 'always' and ' forever.' " The last of these Letters are but a piercing cry, with rare intermissions. One could scarcely imagine into what inex- haustible forms she puts the same sentiment; the river of fire o'erflows at every step in flashing torrents. Let us give the summary in her own language : — 18 INTRODUCTION. " All these many" contradictions, these many impulses are true, and three words explain them : / love you." Eemark that amid this life of exhaustion and delirium, Mile, de Lespinasse is in society ; she receives her friends as usual ; she amazes them at times by her variable humour, but they attribute this change to her regrets at the absence, and then at the death, of M. de Mora. " They do me the honour to believe that I am crushed by the loss that I have met with." They praised her and admired her for it, which redoubled her shame. Poor d'Alembert, who lived in the same house, endeavoured vainly to console her, to amuse her ; he never comprehended why she repulsed him now and then with a sort of horror. Alas ! it was the horror she felt at her own dissimulation with such a friend. The long agony had its ending at last. She died on the 23d of May, 1776, at the age of forty-three years and six months. Her passion for M. de Guibert had lasted for more than three years. Amid this consuming passion, which seems as though it could admit no other element, do not suppose that these Let- ters fail to show the charming mind which was joined to this noble heart. What delicate jesting as she writes of the " good"^ Condorcet, the Chevalier de Chastellux, Chamfort, and others of her society ! What grace ! Lofty and gen- erous sentiments, patriotism and virility of views, are re- vealed in more places than one, and make us appreciate the worthy friend of Turgot and of Malesherbes. When she talks with Lord Shelbume she feels what is grand and vivi- fying for thought in being born under a free Government : " How can we not be grieved at being born under a Govern- ment like ours? As for me, weak and unhappy creature that I am, if I were born again, I would rather be the lowest member of the House of Commons than the King of Prussia INTRODUCTION. 19 himself." Little disposed as she was to augur , any good of the future, she has a moment of transport and hope when she sees her friends made ministers and putting their hands bravely to the work of public regeneration. But even then, what is it that preoccupies her most? She orders her letters from M. de Guibert to be brought to her wherever she may be, — at Mme. GeofPrin's, at M. Tur- got's .even, at table, and during dinner. " What are you reading so earnestly?" asked a neighbour, the inquisitive Mme. de Boufflers. "Is it some paper for M. Turgot?" " Precisely, madame," she replies ; " it is a memorial I must give him presently, and I wish to read it before I give it to him." Thus, all things in her life relate to passion, aU things bring her back to it ; and it is passion alone which gives us the key to this strange heart and struggling destiny. The incalculable merit of the Letters of Mile, de Lespinasse is that we^do not find in them what we find in books and « novels ; here we have the pure drama of nature, such as it reveals itself, now and then, in certain gifted betags ; the surface of life is suddenly torn apart and the life itself is bared to us. It is impossible to encounter such beings, victims of a sacred passion and capable of so generous a woe, without being moved to a sentiment of respect and admi- ration in the midst of the profound pity which they inspire. Nevertheless, if we are wise we shall not envy them ; we shall prefer a calmer interest, gently quickened ; we shall cross the TuUeries (as she did one beautiful sunny morning) and say with her : " Oh ! how lovely ! how divine this weather ! the air I breathe is calming — I love, I regret, I desire, but all those sentiments have won the imprint of sweetness and melancholy. Ah ! this manner of feeling has greater charm than the ardour and throes of passion ! Yes, 20 INTRODUCTION. I believe I am disgusted with them ; I will no longer love so forcibly ; I will love gently — " Yet a moment later she adds, " but never feebly." The pangs are seizing her again. Ah, no ! those who have tasted that poison once are never cured. NOTES ON THE LIFE AND CHARACTER OF MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. The mysteries surrounding Mile, de Lespinasse from her birth to her grave, and beyond it, have given rise to so many false conjectures that it seems well to bring together the undoubted facts of her life, disengaged from such conjectures and from those statements of her nearest friends which are now known to have been mistaken. The folldwing Notes are taken from the Introduction written by M. Eugkne Assd for his edition of the " Letters " published in 1,876, and from the letters and other writings of her friends published in the same volume, also from : — The " (Euvres " of d'Alembert. Paris. An xiii (1805). The " Memoires " of Marmontel. Paris. 1804. The " Correspondence Litt^raire '' of La Harpe and of Grimm. Paris. 1804 and 1830. The « (Euvres " of Condorcet. Paris. 1847-9. The " Mdmoires " of the Abbd de Morellet. The " (Euvres " of Mme. de Stael The "Tombeau de Mile, de Lespinasse," edited by the Bibliophile Jacob (M. Paul Lacroix). 1879. Julie-Jeaime-!l6l^onore de Lespinasse was born at Lyon on the 18th of November, 1732. It was not without good reason that she compared her birth and her early years to the most affecting pages of the novels of Richardson or the Abb6 22 NOTES. Provost. She owed her life to a guilty connection formed by the Comtesse d'Albon ; and it was only by concealing, at least from strangers, the secret of this origin that her mother was able to keep her with her and to treat her, if not publicly, at any rate in reality, as her daughter, and perhaps aS" her best-loved child. About this mystery which surrcSunded the life and youth of Mile, de Lespinasse, her contemporaries gathered only uncertain and often contradictory rumours. Grimm, and even La Harpe and Marmontel, who knew her intimately, do not agree in their narratives. At the period when they wrote nothing was clearly known of those early years ;' to-day it is otherwise, and the testimony of Mme. du Deffand, a connec- tion of the d'Albon family, and that of M. de Guibert, who not only received the confidences of Mile, de Lespinasse, but to whom she read the narrative she had herself written on this period of her life, enable us to rectify all errors. Mile, de Lespinasse was brought up by her mother, from whom she received a solid and even brilliant education, as to which all her contemporaries are agreed. The tenderness of the mother went so far as to think of having her recog- nized as a legitimate daughter. Mme. du Deffand, relating, in a letCfer to the Duchesse de Luynes, her first meeting with the young girl at the chateau de Chamrond, belonging to her (Mme. du Deffand's) brother, the Marquis de Vichy-Gham- rond, who had married the legitimate and eldest daughter of Mme. d'Albon, speaks of her as " a person who has no relatives who acknowledge her, or at any rate none who will, or ought to acknowledge her. This," she adds, " will show you her posi- tion. I found her at Chamrond, where she has lived since the death of Mme. d'Albon (the mother of my sister-in-law), who had brought her up and, in spite of her youth, had given her marks of the greatest friendship." Elsewhere she says NOTES. 23 that the girl had passed her early years with the son of Mme. d'Albon, the Vicomte d'Albon. "We may suppose that those years were spent in the ancient manor of Avranches, situated on the road from Koanne to Lyon, a patrimonial domain of the d'Albons which her mother, the last representative of that branch of the family, inherited from her father, the Marquis de Saint-Forgeux, in 1729. The painful and almost tragic scenes which, it is only too true, darkened the young girl's youth, took place undoubtedly during the first months after her mother's death and, more especially, during the five years from 1747 to 1752, which she passed at Chamrond with the Marquise de Vichy, legiti- mate daughter of the Comtesse d'Albon. The yoimg girl had accepted the proposal to live there, believing that she would be treated as a friend. She was almost immediately made governess to the children, three in number, the eldest being scarcely eight years old. But the bitterness of her position came much less from the humble duties she was required to perform than from the manner 'in which she was treated. When Mme. du Deffand went to pass the summer of 1752 at Chamrond with her brother and sister-in-law, she noticed the intelligence and the charm of Mile, de Les- pinasse, and was also struck by the air of sadness which dimmed her face. Soon she obtained her confidence. " She told me," says Mme. du Deffand, " that it was no longer pos- sible for her to remain with M. and Mme. de Vichy ; that she had long borne the harshest and most humiliating treat- ment ; that her patience was now at an end, and for more than a year she had declared to Mme. de Vichy that she must go away, being unable to bear any longer the scenes that were made to her daUy." Nevertheless, the conduct of Mile, de Lespinasse on the death of her mother had been such as ought to have won her 24 NOTES. not only the esteem and respect, but the affection of those who, by blood if not by law, were her brother and sister. Put in possession of a large sum of money by her dying mother, who intended to have secured to her a rich future, she had generously and spontaneously given it to the Vicomte d'Albon, thus reducing herself to the modest income of a hundred crowns left to her by the will of her mother. Mile, de Lespinasse had resolved to fling herself into a convent rather than remain longer with the Vichys, when Mme. du Deffand, now nearly blind and seeking a com- panion, proposed to the young girl to live with her in Paris, in that convent of Saint-Joseph which, with nothing cloistral about it, served (like the Abbaye-aux-Bois in our own day) as a decent but very worldly retreat for a small number of women of rank, in which each had her separate and inde- pendent suite of rooms. It was in October, 1752, that Mme. du Deffand made this proposal to Mile, de Lespinasse, but it was not until sixteen months later, in April, 1754, that the latter was able to accept an offer she had welcomed eagerly. She spent those months in a convent at Lyon, under the friendly eye and protection of Cardinal de Tencin. The delay was caused by futile efforts to obtain the con- sent of the Vicomte dAlbon and Mme. de Vichy to the new arrangement. FUled with incurable distrust, the brother and sister refused to sanction a project which they regarded as a menace to their prosperity ; although Mme. du Deffand had taken upon herself the care of avoiding that danger by exacting from Mile, de Lespinasse a pledge never to use her new position to establish her rights to the name and to a share in the fortune of the d'Albon family. The following extracts from the letters of Mme. du Deffand throw light on this period : — NOTES. 25 From Mme. la Marquise du Deffand to Mile, de Lespinasse. Paris, February 13, 1754. I am very glad, my queen, that you are satisfied with my letters and also with the course which you have taken towards M. d'Albon. I am convinced that he will resolve on securing you a pension; he would be stoned by every one if he did otherwise. In case he re- fuses, you obtoin entire freedom to follow your own will, which I trust will bring you to live with me. But examine yourself well, my queen, and be very sure that you will not repent. In your last letter you wrote me very tender and flattering things j but remember that you did not think the same only two or three months ago ; you then confessed to me that you were frightened at the dull life I made you foresee, — a life which, although you are accustomed to it, would be more intolerable in the midst of the great world than it has been in your seclusion ; you feared, you said, to fall into a state of discouragement, which would render you intolerable, and inspire me with disgust and repentance. Those were your expressions ; you thought them a fault which required my pardon, and you begged me to forget them ; but, my queen, it is nat a fault to speak our thoughts, and explain our dispositions ; on the contrary, we can do nothing better. ... I shall treat you not only with politeness, but even with compliments before the world, to accustom it to the consideration it ought to have for you. ... I shall not have the air of seeking to introduce you ; I expect to make you desired; and if you know me well, you need have no anxiety as to the manner in which I shall treat your self-love. But you must rely on the knowledge that I have of the world. . . . There is a second point on which I must explain myself to you ; it is that the slightest artifice, or even the most trifling little art, if you were to put it into your conduct, would be intolerable to me. I am naturally distrustful, and all those in whom I detect slyness become suspicious to me to the point of no longer feeling the slightest confidence in them. I have two intimate friends, Formont and d'Alembert; I love them passionately, but less for their agreeable charms and their friendship for me than for their absolute truthfulness. Therefore, you must, my queen, resolve to live with me with the utmost truth and sincerity, and never 26 NOTES. use insinuation, nor any exaggeration ; in a word, never deviate, and never lose one of the greatest charms of youth, which is candour. You have much, intelligence, you have gaiety, you are capable of feelings ; with all these qualities you wiU be charming so long as you let yourself go to your natural impulse, and are without pretension and without subterfuge. . . . March 29, 1754. . r . Another favour I have to ask of you (and *it is the most important of all), namely : not to come to me unless you have totally forgotten who you are, and unless you have made a firm resolution never to think of changing your civil state. It would be perfidy to make use of my friendship to cover me with shame, to expose me to the blame of all honourable persons, to make my family my relentless enemies. The slightest attempt of this kind that you might make while living with me would be an unpardon- able crime. I hope, my queen, that you have ijo need to consult yourself again on this point. It is long since you promised me all I could desire on this subject. I am ' perfectly certain that any such attempt would be in vain ; but it would, none the less, be dreadful for me if you made one, and I repeat that I should never forgive it. . . . April 8, 1754. ... I hope, my queen, that I shall have no reason to repent what I do for you ; and that you will not come to me unless you are fully decided to make no attempt [to change your social state]. You know but too well how useless such efforts are ; but in future, when living with me, they would be fatal to you, for the grief they would cause me would draw down upon you powerful enemies, and you would find yourself in a state of abandonment in which there would be no resource. That said, there remains only to tell you of the joy I shall have in seeing you and in living with you. I shall write at once to M. le Cardinal to beg him to start you from Lyon as soon as possible. . . . Adieu, my queen; pack your trunks and come to be the happi- ness and consolation of my life; it does not depend on me to make it reciprocal. NOTES. 27 Mile, de Lespinasse was twenty-two years of age when she came to take the situation thus foreshadowed. Mme. du Deffand was fifty-seven, and already nearly blind. Long since celebrated for her wit, she was beginning to be so for her salon, where, side , by side with men of letters, were found all that aristocracy could then present that was most distinguished for taste and intellect. Mile, de Lespinasse, on her first entrance to a world so new to her, was not out of place. Her tact, her intelligence won all suffrages ; we find the proof of it in the praises bestowed upon her by such good judges as the Chevalier d'Aydie, the Prince de Beauvau, and President H^nault. The qualities she may have lacked she soon acquired by contact with the most polished society that ever existed. " See what an education I received ! " she says herself. «Mme. du Deffand, President Hdnault, the A'bb4 Bon, the Archbishop of Toulouse, the Archbishop of Aik, M. Turgot, M. d'Alembert, the Abb^ de Boismont, — these are the persons who taught me to speak and to think, and who have deigned to consider me as something." This life in common lasted ten years, from 1754 to 1764. Begun under such auspices, for what reason did it become a burden to the one who proposed it and to the other wha accepted it ? How came it to end in an open rupture which had all the importance of an event, and actually divided, almost, into two camps, the society of that day ? Evidently there were faults on both sides : Mme. du Deffand abusing the superiority which her rank and her r61e as protectress gave her over Mile, de Lespinasse; "and the latter allowing, little by little, indifference and coldness to take the place of her early interest and zeal. But the true determining cause of the rupture was the rivalry, the jealousy perhaps, which grew up between the two women. "We recall Mme. du Def- fand's words in the foregoing letter : " There is a point on 28 NOTES. which I must explain myself to you. The slightest artifice, even the most trifling little art, in your conduct would be intolerable to me." That art, that artifice. Mile, de Lespinasse was guilty of in the eyes of her protectress — let us use the true word, mis- tress — on the day when she received in her.own little room, privately and, as it were, secretly, the most illustrious friends of the marquise, Turgot, Marmontel, d'Alembert, — d'Alem- bert of all others ! the favourite of Mme. du Deffand ! When the latter, who slept till evening wearied with her late hours, discovered this fact her anger broke forth into violent re- proaches. " It was nothing less to her mind," says Marmon- tel, " than treachery ; she uttered loud outcries, accusing the poor girl of stealing her friends, and declaring she would no longer warm that serpent in her bosom." This abrupt separation left MUe. de Lespinasse without resources, reduced to the paltry income of a hundred crowns which her mother had left her in her wUl. But she had friends, and they did not fail her. Not only did d'Alembert (whom Mme. du Deffand compelled to choose between her- y ^ self and MUe. de Lespinasse) not hesitate to boldly 'take the a^ part of the latter, not only did all those who might be called her intimates — Turgot, Chastellux, Marmontel, the Comte d'Anldzy, the Duchesse de Chatillon — stand by her, without at the same time breaking wholly with her rival, but the special friends of Mme. du Deffand, those who remained with her to the last, did not refrain from giving to Mile, de Lespinasse the most touching and practical marks of inter- est. It was felt, moreover, that she was already a power, and society desired not to quarrel with a rising sovereign. " AU the friends of Mme. du Deffand," says Marmontel, " became hers. It was easy to convince them that the anger of the former was unjust. President H^nault himself de- w- NOTES. 29 clared for her. The Duchesse de Luxembourg blamed her old friend openly, and made a present to Mile, de Lespinasse of the complete furniture of the apartment she had hired ; and the Duo de Choiseul obtained for her from the king an aiinual sum which put her above actual need." In quitting Mme. du Deffand, Mile, de Lespinasse did not exile herself from the faubourg Saint-Germain; she established her new home not far from the convent of Saint- Joseph, in the street, and close to the convent, of Belle- Chasse. Installed in this apartment, which, though modest, must have been almost vast to receive the visitors who pressed there in greater numbers daily, she was not long alone; a year later d'Alembert joined her, thus associating his life definitely with that of a woman whom he had loved for eight years, and by whom he thought himself beloved. " They lived very far apart," says Marmontel ; " and though ■ in bad weather it was difficult for d'Alembert to return at night from the rue de Belle-Chasse to the rue Michel-le- Comte, where his foster-mother lived, he never thought of quitting the latter until he fell ill of putrid fever, for which the first remedy is pure and free air. His physician, Bou- vard, became uneasy and declared to us that his present lodging might be fatal to him. Watelet offered him his house near the boulevard du Temple ; there he was taken, and MUe. de Lespinasse, Lq spite of all that might be said or thought, went to nurse him. No one, however, thought or said anything but good of her action. D'Alembert recovered, and then, consecrating his life to her who had taken care of him, he went to live in the same house. Nothing more inno- cent than their intimacy, therefore it was respected ; malig- nity itself never attacked it; and the consideration which MUe. de Lespinasse enjoyed, far from suffering any shock, was only the more honourably and publicly established." 30 NOTES. We must not exaggerate the character of this union, which was restricted solely, on the part of d-Alembert, to " lodging in the same house," in which there were ten other families. Mile, de Lespinasse always maintaining her separate suite of rooms. The question here arises as to the nature of d'Alembert's feelings for his friend. " Oh ! you," he cries after her death, "whom I have so tenderly and constantly loved, and by whom I believed that I was loved." Elsewhere he speaks of his " heart which has never ceased to be hers." And yet in spite of these protestations of love, he rejects, in a letter to Voltaire, the very idea of his marriage : " The person to whom they marry me, in the gazettes, is in truth a most estimable person in character, and formed by the charm and sweetness of her society to make a husband happy. But she is worthy of a better establishment than mine, and there is between us neither marriage nor love, only reciprocal esteem and all the gentleness of friendship." Member of the Academy of Sciences, and also of the French Academy, the perpetual secretary of which he soon became, and the recognized phief of the Encyclopedists, d'Alembert was not so bad a match as he chooses to say. The truth is that the love of poor d'Alembert for his friend was never without a rival ; first, the Marquis de Mora, whose memory rent her soul with regret and remorse, and last, the Comte de Guibert, who, by the passion he inspired, brought her life to its close in weakness and misery. When Mile, de Lespinasse, ceasing to be a dependent in the shadow of Mme. du Deffand, opened her rival salon in the rue de Belle-Chasse, she was thirty-two years old, with little or no beauty, but a face of astonishing mobility, on which could be read the emotions of her soul, with, above all, a suddenness of impressions, a vivacity and charm of NOTES. 31 mind which created around her a sort of atmosphere of enthusiasm and sympathy. Such are the chief features of the portrait which her contemporaries have left of her. La Harpe speaks of her as a person " well-made, with an agreeable face before the small-pox spoilt it." " She was taU and well-formed," says M. de Guibert. "I did not know her until she was thirty-eight years of age, but her figure was still noble and full of grace. But what she possessed, and what distinguished her above all else, was that first and greatest charm of all, without Which beauty is but a cold perfection, the charm of an expressive coimtenance; hers had no special character ; it united all." But, as often hap- pens to persons for whom the trials of life begin' early, one thing was lacking to Mile, de Lespinasse, namely, the look of youth, in which happiness plays so great a part. " Her face," says Grimm, " was never young.'' But her soul was — ever. To Marmontel it seemed " an ardent soul, a fiery nature, a romantic imagination." "She was bom," says Grimm, " with nerves that were marvellously sensitive. But that sensibility, which gave passion such grasp upon her, made her also accessible to all generous emotions — enthusiasm for the noble and the good, indigna- tion at the bad and the mean." " She was of all styles," says Guibert ; " the lover of what was good ! How she enjoyed, how she knew how to praise that which pleased her, above all, that which touched her ! ". These -qualities had their reverse, namely : infatuation and variability. D'Alembert reproaches her for too ready a credulity, especially when sentiments of a specially tender nature were in question. She herself speaks of that " mobility of soul of which they accuse me," and admits it. Such was her soul. As for her mind : all was natural, spontaneous, of an elegant simplicity as far removed from 32 NOTES. commonplaceness as from studied elegance ; the most perfect harmony existed between thought and expression ; she had a solid education, leaving more to divine than was shown ; a smiling good sense rather than a downright, open gaiety ; and finally, a tact so perfect that she seemed to have the secret of all natures and aU susceptibilities. These were her salient traits, her most seductive endowments. D'Alem- bert dwells particularly on this exquisite tact : " What dis- tinguishes you above aU," he says to her, " is the art of say- ing to each that which suits him; this art, though little common, is very simple in you ; it consists in never speaking of yourself to others, but much of them." "I have never known," says La Harpe, "a woman who had more natural wit, less desire to show it, and more talent in showing to advantage that of others." And Marmontel adds his word : "One of her charms was the ardent nature that impas- sioned her language and communicated to her opinions the warmth, the sympathy, the eloquence of feeling. Often, too, with her, reason grew playful ; a gentle philosophy allowed itself light jesting." We can easily comprehend the influence that such qualities of heart and mind must have had on the society of that period. And if we add to this personal influence of MUe. de Lespinasse that (which was very great) of d'Alembert, the recognized leader of the philosophic party, who added to his fame as a learned man a literary renown which made the French Academy choose him as its perpetual secretary, we shall form a correct idea of what the salon of MUe. de Lespi- nasse was — more literary than that of the Marquise du DefiFand, more aristocratic than that of the bourgeoise Mme. Geoffrin. The dinners and suppers, which held so great a place in the fame of the Maecenases of that day, counted for nothing in the celebrity of the salon in the rue de Belle- NOTES. 33 Chasse. There, people talked from five o'clock to ten o'clock daily. We may say that for twelve years, from 1764 to 1776, there was not a day when the choicest society failed to be there, and not a day when Mile, de Lespinasse failed to receive it. Not for all the world would her friends have missed these daily festivals of intellect, grace, and elegance. Other salons had their habitual guests, their reigning and dominating friends : with Mme. du Deffand were President H^nault, Pont de Veyle, the Prince de Beauvau, the Choiseuls, and Horace Walpole, on his too rare journeys to Paris ; with Mme. Geoffrin, Marmontel and Antoine Thomas; with the Baron d'Holbach, Diderot and Grimm; but with Mile, de Lespinasse it was not even d'Alembert who reigned. In her salon alone were received on a footing of perfect equality, without marked preference, all that Paris had of most illus- trious in letters, sciences, and arts. D'Alembert was no more than an ordinary visitor, unus inter pares. But his talent as a talker made the place more delightful. " His conversation," says Grimm, " offered all that could instruct and divert the mind. He lent himself with as much facility as good-will to whatever subject would please most generally; bringing to it an almost inexhaustible fund of ideas, anecdotes, and curious recollections. There was, I may say, no topic, however dry or frivolous in itself, that he had not the secret of making interesting. He spoke well, related with much precision, and brought out his point with a rapidity which was peculiar to him. All his humorous sayings have a delicate and profound originality." Variety — such was the special character of the salon of Mile, de Lespinasse; and this is particularly shown in the account that Grimm has left of it. " Without fortune, without birth, without beauty, she had succeeded in collecting around her a very numerous, very 3 34 NOTESi varied, and very assiduous society. Her circle met daily from five o'clock until nine in the evening. There we were sure to find choice men of aU orders in the State, the Church, the Court, — military men, foreigners, and the most dis- tinguished men of letters. Every one agrees that though the name of M. d'Alembert may have drawn them thither^ it was she alone who kept them there. Devoted wholly to the care of preserving that society, of which she was the soul and the charm, she subordinated to this pm^ose all her tastes and aU her personal intimacies. She seldom went to the theatre or into the country, and when she did make an exception to this rule it was an event of which all Paris was hotified in advance. . . . Politics, religion> philosophy, anec- dotes, news, nothing was excluded from the conversation, and, thanks to her care, the most trivial little narrative gaiaed, as naturally as possible, the place and notice it de- served. News of all kinds was gathered there in its first freshness." Ko one has better pictured than Marmontel the influence of Mile, de Lespinasse on her society, or made us feel more fully the sort of creative breath which, from this chaos, brought forth a world so brilliant and harmonious. " I do not put," he says, " among the number of my private societies the assembly which gathered every evening in the apartments of MUe. de Lespinasse, for with the exception of a few friends of d'Alembert,, such as the Chevalier de Chas- teUux, the Abbe Morellet, Saint-Lambert, and myself, the circle was formed of. persons who were not boimd together. She had taken them here and there in society, but so weU assorted were they that once there they' fell into harmony like the strings of an instrument touched by an able hand. Following out that comparison, I may say that she playfed the instrument with an art thait came of genius ; she seemed NOTES. 35 to know ■what tone each strmg would yield before she touched it ; I mean to say that our minds and our natures were so well known to her that in order to bring them into play she had but to say a word. Nowhere was conversation more lively, more brilliant, or better regulated than at her house. It was a rare phenomenon indeed, the degree of tempered, equable heat which she knew so weU how to maintain, sometimes by moderating it, sometimes by quickening it. The continual activity of her soul was communicated to our souls, but measurably; hef imagination was the mainspring, her reason the regulator. Eemark that the brains she stirred at will were neither feeble nor frivolous : the CondiUacs and Turgots were among them; d'Alembert was like a simple, doeUe child beside her. Her talent for casting out a thought and giving it for discussion to men of that class, her own talent in discussing it with precision, sometimes with elo- quence, her talent for bringing forward new ideas and vary- ing, the topic — always with the facility and ease of a fairy, who, with one touch of her wand, can change the scene of her enchantment — these talents, I say, were not those of an ordinary woman. It was not with the follies of fashion and vanity that daily, during four hours of conversation, without languor and without vacuum, she knew how to make herself interesting to a wide circle of strong minds." Grimm insists on very nearly the same traits. " She pos- sessed," he says, "in an eminent degree that art so diffi- cult and so precious, — of making the best of the minds of others, of interesting them, and of bringing them into play without any appearance of constraint or effort. She knew how to unite the different styles of mind, sometimes even the most opposed, without appearing to take the slightest pains to do so; by a word, adroitly flung in, she sustained the conversation, animating and varying it as she pleased. 36 NOTES. No one knew better how to do the honours of her house; she put every one in his place, and every one was content with it. She had great knowledge of the world, and that species of politeness which is most agreeable ; I mean that which has the tone of personal interest." There were times, however, when the sensitive taste of MUe. de Lespinasse was shocked and overcome by occasional vulgarity of manners or expression. Of this the Abb^ Mo- rellet has left an amusing record in his " Memoirs." " MUe. de Lespinasse," he relates, " loving men of intellect passionately and neglecting no means of knowing them and attracting them to her circle, ardently desired to know M. de Buffon. Mme. Geoffrin, agreeing to procure her that happi- ness, invited Buffon to pass an evening at her house. Behold Mile, de Lespinasse in the seventh heaven, promising herself to observe closely that celebrated man, and not lose a single word that issued from his lips. The conversation having be- gun, on the part of Mile, de Lespinasse by flattering compli- ments, such as she knew so well how to pay, the topic of the art of writing was brought up, and some one remarked, with eulogy, how weU M. de Buffon had united clearness with loftiness of style, a union very difficult and rarely produced. ' Oh, the devil ! ' said M. de Buffon, his head high, his eyes partly closed, and with an air half silly, half inspired: 'oh, the devil! when it comes to clarifying one's style, that 's another pair of sleeves.' At this speech, this vulgar comparisouj MUe. de Lespinasse was visibly troubled; her countenance changed, she threw herself back in her chair, muttering between her teeth, 'Another pair of sleeves! clarify his style ! ' and she did not recover herself the whole evening." But conversation alone was not all that went on in the salon of the rue de Belle-Chasse ; academicisins were made NOTES. 37 there. Chastellux owed his election in a great measure to Mile, de Lespinasse. In her last hours, already lying on her deathbed, she secured that of La Harpe. " M. de La Harpe " says Bachaumont in his Memoirs, "was one of her nurs- lings ; by her influence she opened the doors of the Academy to him who is now its secretary. This poet was the last of those whom she enabled to enter them." All power has its detractors, all royalty its envious carpers, and these cast great blame on Mile, de Lespinasse for caballing, so they said, in the interests of her friends and through the influ- ence of d'Alembert, to close the doors of the Academy to those who were not her friends. Dorat, whose style she did not like (and perhaps not his person), attributed to her the various checks his academic ambition had met with ^ and he made himself the organ of these accusations in two come- dies entitled, "Les PrSneurs" and "Merlin Bel Esprit." Society came very near seeing renewed the scandal of the famous comedy of "Les Philosophes," and MUe^ de Les- pinasse only just escaped being acted on the stage during her lifetime by Dorat, as Rousseau had been by Palissot. "With- out justifying Dorat, whose comic muse was otherwise very inoffensive, it cannot be denied that Mile, de Lespinasse played a very great part in all the Academic struggles, and that her devotion to the ideas of d'Alembert and the Ency- clopedists, often carried her too far. Grimm, who men- tions the reproach, contests its justice without denying its cause. " Her enemies," he says," blamed her, very ridiculously, for being concerned in a variety of affairs which were not her business, and for having favoured by her intrigues that philo- sophic despotism which the cabal of the bigots accused M. d'Alembert of exercising over the Academy. But why should women, who decide everything in France, not decide 38 NOTES. also the honours of literature ? . . . M. Doratj who thinks he has reason to complain of kep, has allowed himself to take vengeance in a play called 'Les PrSneurs.' Sevfiral persons who have heard it read think it has more invention and more gaiety than M. Dorat has put into his other come- dies. The play turns on a young man whom they want to initiate into the mysteries of the modern philosophy, and to whom, in consequence, they teach the methods of acquiring celebrity ia the quickest manner. M. d'Alembert and Mile, de Lespinasse play the chief rSles. The story is told that one of their most zealous admirers, an old courtier who is very hard of hearing, when :tih^ plot of the new play was read before him, seeing every one about him ecstatic, cried out, louder than any of them, 'There now! that is good comedy.' " We now know the friends who occupied the mind of MUe. de Lespinasse ; we have next to speak of those who filled her heart. . . . But here we must turn to the sketch of M. de Mora and M. de Guibert, and to the picture of the love, the passion, the remorse that consumed her life contained in Sainte- Beuve's essay which precedes these Notes. All further analysis would be superfluous, for what can be needed after the sympathetic but judicial insight of that- true discemer of men and women ? Nevertheless, for a clear understanding of the following letters, which are full of allusions that need a clue, it is weU to refer once more to the particular fact that imderlies them, namely : the struggle in her soul between her love for M. de Mora and her passion for M. de Guibert. All the letters up to the time of M. de Mora's death have this struggle for their key-note, — a struggle naturally Ml of inconsistencies. After bis death her remorse begins, and, embittered by M. de NOTES. 39 . Guibert's unfaithfulness — which her passion condones — it kills her. Mile, de Lespiaasse possessed the mysterious gift of charm, a gift that cannot be explained or analyzed, a spiritual gift, not dependent on beauty or physical attraction, and one which many women exercise equally over men and women. The word " exercise," however, is not applicable to it, for it is an unconscious faculty, a gift bestowed on women which they themselves are unable to explain ; some of its elements are easily defined, — such as self -unconsciousness, perception of the souls of others, — but as a whole the gift is mysterious. MUe. de Lespinasse had it in an eminent degree until the period of her fatal passion. Plainly it was a part of the tie between herself and M. de Mora, and she never lost it with her circle of friends so long as she lived, nor after her death. The story of d'Alemberf s attachment to her is as full of pain as her own, and even more pathetic. His was the passion of friendship, if not of love ; and it is dif&cult to acquit her of indifference to his feelings, and even of cruelty, especially in the bequest of her correspondence with M. de Mora, to be read and destroyed by him at her death. Even Marmontel, so faithful to her himself, says : " MUe. de Lespinasse was no longer the same with d'Alembert ; not only did he have to bear her coldness, but often her fretful humours full of gloom and bitterness." She admits this herself, and gives as its excuse (which Sainte-Beuve recognizes) that her soul was wrung with remorse for the deception she was practising upon him. A true excuse no doubt, and one with which we ought to credit her ; but the sorrow and the distress to him were none the less, and the shock when he discovered the truth after her death was not the more bearable. No, his passion stands beside hers in this sad story, and we cannot help comparing them. Hers has the sturm und drang of 40 NOTES. passionate emotion, with fame to crown it: his was silent, sorrow, and he died of it, unsung. Marmontel leaves us no doubt that her death was the cause of his. " D'Alembert," he says, " was unconsoled and incon- solable for his loss. It was then that he buried himself in the lodging given to him in the Louvre as secretary of the I'rench Academy. I have told elsewhere how he passed the rest of his life. He often complained to me of the dreadful solitude into which he had fallen. In vain I reminded him of all that he had told me himself , about the change in the feelings of his friend. " Yes," he replied, " she was changed, but I was not ; she lived no longer for me, but I lived always for her. Now that she is gone, I know not why I live. Ah ! would that I had still to suffer the bitter moments she knew so well how to soften and make me forget ! Do you remem- ber the happy evenings we spent with her ? And now — what remains to me ? Instead of herself when I come home, I find her shade. This lodging in the Louvre is like a tomb ; I never enter it except with horror." D'Alembert survived his friend, whose memory never left him for an instant, seven years. It was on a Thursday, May 23, 1776, that death brought to Mile, de Lespinasse the rest for which she longed. The account that La Harpe has left of this event is perhaps the most affecting that we have of it : " During the last days of her life she saw none but her intimate friends. They were all in her chamber on the night of her death ; and all were weeping. She had passed the last three days in a state of exhaustion that scarcely permitted her to speak aloud. The nurses revived her with cordials and raised her in her bed. ' Do I stiU live ? ' she said. Those were her last words." The Letters of Mile, de Lespinasse cannot be read and judged by personal standards or social convention ; not even NOTES. 41 from the standpoint of our present phase of human nature, which a century has changed from hers. There are many judgments and countless criticisms that might be made upon her ; but the essential thing is that here is a human soul laid bare in the fierce light of the fire of passion, and fit to stand by the great ones of her class, Sappho, H^loise, and the un- known souls whose genius never passed to words ; for this passion of loving is a form of genius. LETTERS OF MLLE. DE LESPINASSE TO M. DE GUIBERT, Pakis, Sattirday evening, May 15, 1773. You start on Tuesday ; and as I know not tlie effect which your departure will have upon me, as I know not if I shall have freedom or will to write, I wish to speak with you once more and assure myself of receiving news of you from Strasljurg. You must teU me if you arrive there in good health ; if the movement of travelling has not already calmed your soiil. Not that your soul is 'ill, it suffers only from the ills it causes ; and diversion, change of scene will suffice to turn aside those emotions of sympathy which may be painful to you because you are kind and honourable. Yes, you are very kind ; I have just re-read your letter of this morning ; it has the sweetness of Gestner joined to the energy of Jean-Jacques. Eh, mon Dieu ! why unite all that can touch and please, and why, above aU, offer me a blessing of which I am not worthy, which I have not deserved ? No, no ! I do not want your friendship ; it would console me, it would agitate me, and I need rest : I need to forget you for a time. I wish to be sincere with you and with myself ; and, in truth, in the trouble in which I am I fear to be mistaken ; perhaps my remorse is greater than my wrong- 44 LETTEES OF [1773 doing ; perhaps the alarm I have felt is that which would most offend the one I love. I have just received, this instant, a letter so full of confidence in my feelings ; he speaks to me of myself, of what I think, of my soul, with that degree of knowledge and certainty which is uttered only when we feel strongly and keenly. Ah, mon Dieu ! by what charm, by what fatality have you come to distract me ? Why did I not die in the month of September ? I could have died then without regret, without the reproaches that I now make to myself. Alas! I feel it, I could still die for him; there is no interest of mine I would not sacrifice to him — but for two months past I have had none to make ; I do not love more, but I love better. Oh ! he wOl pardon me ! I had suffered so much ! my body, my soul were so exhausted by the long contiauance of the sorrow. The news I received of him threw me sometimes into frenzy. It was then that I first saw you ; then that you revived my soul, then that you brought pleasure into it ; I know not which was sweetest, to feel it, or to owe it to you. But tell me, is this the tone of friendship, the tone of con- fidence ? What is it that is drawing me ? Make me know myself ; aid me to recover myself in a measure ; my soul is convulsed ; is it you, is it your departiu'e, what is it that per- secutes me? I can no more. At this moment I have confidence in youj even to abandonment, but perhaps I shall never speak to you again of my life. Adieu, I shall see you to-morrow ; possibly I shall feel embarrassed by what I have now written to you. Would to heaven that you were my friend, or that I had never known you ! Do you believe me ? Will you be my friend ? Think of it, once only ; is that too much ? 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 45 Sunday, May 23, 1773. If I were young, pretty, and very charming, I should not fail to see much art in your conduct to me ; but as I am nothiug of all that, I find a kindness and an honour in it which have won you rights over my soul forever. You have filled it with gratitude, with esteem, with sensibility, and all other feelings which give intimacy and confidence to Latercourse. I cannot speak as well as Montaigne upon friendship, but, believe me, we shall feel it better. J\jid yet, if what Mon- taigne says had been in his heart, would he have consented to live after the loss of such a friend ? But this is not the question here ; it is of you, of the grace, the delicacy, the timeliness of your quotation. You come to my rescue ; you will not let me blame myself ; you will not suffer your memory to be a sad reproach to my heart, and, perhaps, an offence to my self-respect ; in a word, you wish me to enjoy iu peace the friendship that you offer me and prove to me with as much gentleness as grace. Yes, I accept it ; I make it my blessing ; it will console me ; and if I ever again enjoy your society it will be the pleasure I shall feel and desire the most. I hope you have pardoned me the wrong I did not do. Ton surely feel that it is not possible for me to suspect you of an impulse against kindness and honour. Yet I accused you of it ; that meant nothing, except that I was weak and cul- pable, and, above all, troubled to the point of losing my presence and freedom of miud. You see things too well and too quickly to let me fear you could mistake me ; I am well assured that your soul sees no reason to complain of the emotions of mine. I know that you did not start till Thursday at half -past five o'clock. I was at your door, two minutes after your departure. I had sent in the morning to inquire at what hour you left on 46 LEITEES OF [1773 Wednesday ; and, to my great astonishment, I learned that you were still ia Paris, and it was not known if you- would start on Thursday even. I went myself to learn if you were ill ; and (what may strike you as shocking) it seemed to me that I desired it. Nevertheless, with an inconsistency which I will not explain I felt comforted on learning that you were gone. Yes, your departure has restored my calmness ; hut I feel more sad. You must pardon this, and be satisfied.- I do not know if I regret you, but I miss you as my pleasure ; I believe that active and sensitive souls cling too strongly to pleasure. It is not the idea of the length of your absence that distresses me -^ my thought does not go so far ; it is simply the present that weighs upon my soul, depresses, saddens it, and scarcely leaves it energy to desire better sentiments. But see, what horrible selfishnes ! here are three pages full of myself , and yet I believe it is of you that I &m think-- ing ; at least I feel I must know how you are, whether you are well. When you read this, how far away you will be ! Your person may be only three hundred leagues distant,, but see what strides your thought has already made ! what new objects ! what ideas ! what novel reflections ! It seems to me that I am speaking now to the mere shadow of you ; aU that I know of you has disappeared ; scarcely wUl you find in your, memory any traces of the affections which agitated and excited you during the last days you spent in Paris ;■ and it is best so. You know how we agreed that too great sensibility was a mark of mediocrity, and your character commands you to be great ; your talents condemn you to celebrity. Yield yourself, therefore, to your destiny, and tell youtsfelf, firmly, that you are not made for the soft, inward life that tender- ness and sentiment require. There is only pleasure and no glory in living for a single object. When we reign in one heart i/7aj MLLE. DE LESPlNASSE. 47 only we cannot reign in public opinion. There are names made for history; yours will one day rouse its admiration* When I fill myself with that thought the interest with which you inspire me is a little moderated. Adieu. Monday, May 24, 1773. What say you to this folly ? Scarcely can I flatter myself that you will read me when I overwhelm you with letters ! But you said the other day that we should write at length to friends, to those who please us, to those we would like to talk with. If you spoke truly, you are obliged not only to read me with interest, but With indulgence. I have just re-read my long letter ; mon Dieu, how tiresome I found it ! but if I write it over agaiu it will ,be no better. I feel myself predestined to be tiresome in more ways than one. I am sad and dull ; what can one do with that ? But I have questions to put to you ; answer them, and you will be very amiable. Have you received a letter from Diderot ? He fxpects to leave the 6th of Jime ; thus you wiU see him in Russia. Why did you not start on Wednesday ? Was it to yourself or to some one else that you gave those twenty-four hours ? Have you carried away with you that book of M. Thqmas 1 I hope so ; it has almost the tone of your soul ; it is noble, strong, and virtuous. There are, no doubt, a few de- fects ; he has corrected what was turgid and exaggerated in his style ; but there is too much analysis and enumeration, which fatigue a little — especially when it costs us miuch to separate from an object which fiUs our thoughts. I have been obliged to stop reading it for several days. ^ It is the post- man who decides, twice a week, all the actions of my life ; yesterday he made reading impossible to me. I sought only ' "Essay on the Character, Manners, Morals, and Mind of Women in the different Ages," by Antoine-L^onard Thomas, of the French Academy. Paris, 1772. 48 LETTEBS OF [1773 the letter I did not receive ; why look for it in M. Thomas ? I could not find it there! Did you not promise me news from Strasburg ? Are you surprised now that you pledged yourself to write to me so often? Have you regretted the facility with which you yielded to the interest and eager- ness -shown to you? It is troublesome at a distance of three hundred leagues to have to act for others ; there is no pleasure except in following one's own impulse and senti- ment. See how generous I am ! I offer to return your promise if you now find you have made a mistake. Acknowl- edge it to me, and I assure you I wHl not be wounded. Be- lieve me, it is only vanity that makes people touchy, and I have none ; I am merely a good creature, very stupid, very simple, who loves the happiness and pleasure of those I love better than what is mine or for me. Having that knowledge, be at your ease; write to me "un peu, beaucoup, pas du tout" — but do not fancy that I shall be equally satisfied: for I have even less indifference than vanity. But I have a strength, or a faculty, which renders me able for all : it is that of knowing how to suffer, and to suffer much without complaint. Adieu ; have you reached this point in my letter ? and is it not wearisome ? Sunday, May 30, 1773. I received, yesterday, your Strasburg letter; the time seemed very long since Wednesday, 19th, the day on which I received your last sign of remembrance ; that which came to me yesterday consoled me and did good to my soid, which needs to be diverted by the entrance of a gentle sentiment to which it can yield without trouble .and without remorse. Yes, I can now avow it to myself, I can say it to you — I care for you tenderly ; yovu' absence gives me keen regrets ; but no longer have I to struggle against the feelings you ia- 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 49 spire in me ; I have seen clearly into my souL Ah ! the ex- cess of my sorrow justifies me, I am not guilty, and yet, before long, I shall be a victim. I thought to die Friday on receiving a letter by special courier; the trouble into which it threw me took from me even the power to unseal it ; I was more than a quarter of an hour without moving ; my soul had numbed my senses. At last I read it, and I found but a part of what I feared. I need not tremble for the life of him I love. But sheltered from the greatest of all misfortunes, oh, my God ! how much remains for me to suffer ! how crushed I feel beneath the weight of life! the duration of 01s is more than human strength can bear ; I feel but one courage, often but one need. Ought I not therefore to love you, ought I not to cherish your presence ? You have had the power to divert my mind from an anguish as sharp as it was deep ; I await, I desire your letters. Yes, believe me, none but the unhappy are worthy of friends; if your soul had never suffered never could you have entered mine. I should admire, I should praise your talents, but I should keep aloof, because I have a sort of repugnance to that which fiills my mind only : we must be calm to think ; when excited, agi- tated, we can only feel and suffer. You tell me that you are shaken by regrets, by remorse even ; that your sensibility is all pain. I believe you, and it grieves me ; and yet, I know not why, the impression that I receive from your letter is the contrary of that. There seems to me a calmness, a re- pose and force in all your expressions ; you appear to speak of what you have felt, not of what you are feeling ; in short, if I had rights, if I were sensitive, if friendship were not such a facile thing, I should tell you that Strasburg is far, very far from the rue Tarenne. President Montesquieu asserts that climate has a great in- 50 LETTERS OF [1773 fluence on the moral condition ; is Strasburg more northerly than Paris ? Think how much I shall have to fear Peters- burg ! — No, I will not fear ; I believe in you ; I believe in your friendship. Explain to me why I have this confidence, but be careful not to think that vanity counts for anything. My feeling for you is purged of that vile alloy which cor- rupts and enfeebles all affections. You would have been very amiable had you told me whether my letter was the only one you found in Strasburg. See how generous I am. I could be willing that it were changed for the one you wished to find there. Let us decide our ranks, give me my place ; but as I do not like to change, let it be a good one. I do not want that of the unhappy per- son who is displeased with you, nor that of her with whom you are displeased. I know not where you can place me; but do so if possible, that we may both be content ; do not bargain, give me much, you wiU see that I shall not abuse it. Oh! you shall see how well I know how to love! I can only love ; I know only how to love ! With moderate facul- ties, we can yet do much when we centre them on a single object. Well! I have but one thoughtj>and that thought fills my soul and all my life. YoU thiuk that dissipation and new scenes and knowledge will distract you but little from your friends. Know your- self better ; yield in good faith and with good grace to the power which your nature has over your will, over your senti- ments, over all your actions. Persons who are governed by the need to love do not go to Petersburg. They may go very far, but if so, they are condemned to it, and they do not say that they "re-enter their souls" to find there what they love; they believe they have never quitted it, be they a thousand leagues away. But there is more than one man- ner of being good and excellent ; yours will carry you far 1773] MLLE, DE LESPINASSE. 51 along in the path of advancement in every acceptation of those words. I should pity a sensitive woman to Whom you would be the first object 5 her life would be consumed by fears and re- grets- but I should congratulate a vain woman, a proud woman ; she would pass her life in applauding you, in adorn- ing herself to your taste. Such women love glory, they love the opinion of the world, and lustre. All that is very fine, very noble, but very cold, and very far from the passion which says : — " Death and Hell appear before me ; Eamire ! joyfully I go there for thee." But I am distracted — worse than that, I am singular; I have but one tone, one colour, one manner ; and when they please no longer they chill and weary. You must tell me which of the two effects they have produced. But you must also teU me, if you please, the only news that interests me, namely, how you are. The place of governor of the Ecole Militaire is not yet given. June 6, 177S. Ah ! how rare is that which gives pleasure, and how slowly it comes ! time seems infinite since the 24th, and I know not how much longer I shall have to wait for a letter from Dresden. But, at least, wQl you promise to be in- clined to write to me as often as you can ? Let me have, opposed to my pleasure, agatast my interests, only that which does not depend on you : I mean distance and ther de- lay of couriers. But I fret lest your curiosity, your activity, in a word, your merits and your virtues should be against me. That love of glory, for instance, wiU make your love, or rather my own, one sorrow the more in my life. Yet you can say to me, as the hermit said to Zadig, " I have some- 52 LETTERS or [1773 times poured comfort into the souls of the sorrowful." Yes, I owe to you that which makes the charm and the sweetness of friendship ; I feel that the tie is already too strong, that it takes too great an ascendancy over my soul ; when my soul suffers it is tempted to turn to you for consolation ; if it were calm and unoccupied it might be drawn to you by an impulse more active, by a desire for pleasure, even. Am I so much to you ? Am I not better fitted to love and regret you ? At best, my sentiments can only be agree- able to you ; but to me, before I examined your character, you were already necessary to me. But what think you of a soul that gives itself before knowing whether it will be accepted, before being able to judge whether it will be re- ceived with pleasure or with gratitude only? Ah! mon Dieu ! if you were not gifted with feeling, what grief you would cause me ! For it does not suffice me that you are honourable : I have virtuous friends, I have hetter still ; and yet I care only for what you are to me — but truly, sincerely, is there no madness, perhaps even absurdity, in believing you my friend ? Answer me ; not coldly, but with tmtL Though your soul is agitated, it is not ill like mine, which passes ceaselessly from convulsion to depression. I can judge of nothing ; I mislead myself continually •, I take poison to calm me. You see I cannot guide myself; en- lighten me, strengthen me. I will believe you ; you shall be my support; you shall succour me like reflection itself, which is no longer at my service. I know not how to foresee. . I can distinguish nothing. Conceive my trouble. I can rest only on the idea of death ; there are days when death is my only hope ; but also I have other instincts, and very contrary ones ; sometimes I feel myself manacled to life ; the thought of grieving him I love takes from me all desire to be com- forted, if it be at the cost of his peace of mind. 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 53 In short, what can I say to you ? The excess of my in- consistency bewilders my mind, the weight of life is crushing my soul. What must I do ? What will become of me ? Will it be Charenton or the grave which will deliver me from myself ? I make you a victim if you care enough for me to take part in what I suffer, and I regret it ; but if I have caused you only ennui, I shall sink with confusion. Do not think you can hide this from me, whatever effort you may make to do so ; you cannot deceive my interest — But gratify it by telling me how you are ; have you had as much pleasure as you hoped, or less ? Is your health better than during the last days you were here? You are very modest, you never told me how you were celebrated at Strasburg; verses were made in your honour; they were very bad, it is true, but the intention was so good ! Do not be angry. Tell me, have you read " Le Conn^table " on your journey [tragedy in rhyme by M. de Guibert], not while posting, but aloud in good society ? Apropos of the " Conn^table," if you had a certain sensibility, if you were like Montaigne and regarded me like another La B^otie, how I should pity you for deny- ing yourself the pleasure of giving me a mark of confidence, esteem, and affection ! I do not boast of myself, but I assure you I should be torn by remorse if I had treated you in that way. What does that prove ? — tell me. Adieu ; I know aU the difference in our affections ; teach me the resemblance ; that game [then in vogue] will never .have been played with so much interest. Sunday, June 20, 1773. Oh ! mon Dieu ! are you dead, or have you already forgot- ten how keen and sorrowful is the remembrance of you in the souls you have left ? Not a word from you since May 24th ! It is very difficult not to believe it is a little 54 LETTERS OP [1773 your fault. If that is so, yOu deserve neither the regret my heart feels, nor the reproaches that it makes you. I knew that M. d'Aguesseau had received no news of you. I in- terest myself in you in a manner so true, so sincere, that I should have been delighted to have heard that you had given him the preference over me. He deserves it, doubt- less in all respects ; but it is not justice that rules feeling. Do you believe that if that virtue governed me I should be uneasy at your silence, and need *so many proofs of your friendship ? Alas, no ! I cannot even explain to myself why I am so concerned about you at this moment, for I heard yesterday some news which engulfs my soul in sorrow; I have passed the night in tears ; but when my head and all my faculties were exhausted, when I gained one moment which was not a pain, I thought of you, and it seemed to me that had you been here I should have written you what I suffered and perhaps you would have come to me. Tell me if I deceive myself. When my soul suffers am I wrong to seek consolation in yours ? In the midst of travel and many interests so different froin those that touch and affect the heart, can you stiU'hear a language which is foreign to most men carried away by dissipation or intoxicated by vanity ? Nor is that language better known to those who, like you, are filled with the desire for knowledge and a love of fame. You are so con- vinced that sensibility is a sign of mediocrity that I faint with fear lest your soul should close itself wholly to this emo- tion. It is fifteen days since I wrote to you, and I believed yesterday that I would not write to you again untU I heard from you. Suffering has softened my soul and I yield to it. At five o'clock this morning I took two grains of opiuin ; I obtained a calmness better , than sleep ; my pain is less rend- ing; I feel myself crushed, with less force to resist. The 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 55 violence of the soul is moderated ; I can speak to you, I can moan, but yesterday I had no power of expression. I could not have told you that I fear for the life of him I love ; I could have died sooner than pronounce those words that froze my heart. You have loved; conceive, therefore, what such terrors are. Until Wednesday next I am left in an uncertainty that horrifies me, but commands me, nevertheless, to live. Yes, it is not possible to die so long as we are loved — but it is dreadful to live. Death is the most urgent need of my soul, yet I feel myself manacled to life. Pity me ; forgive me for abusing the kindness you have shown me. Is it in you or in me that I find the confi:dence that draws me on ? They say that you cannot have found the King of Prussia iQ Berlin. Have you gone to Stettin to join him ? he was to be there tiU the 20th. I am so anxious"; it seems to me we could have had news of you from Berlin. How wrong of you if you have shown the slightest negligence. You know well that you gave me your word of honour that some one should write to me if you were ill. But do not make use of that pretext which may content ordinary friendship which does not wish to be made uneasy ; that would be detest- able ; I do not wi^ to be spared ; I wish to suffer through my friends, for my friends ; and I treasure a thousand times more the troubles that come to me through them than all the happiness on earth that is not derived from them. Good-bye; the opium is still in my head; it affects my sight ; perhaps it makes me more stupid than usual — what matter if it does ? it is not my mind, only my sorrows that interest you. Monday evening, June 21, 1773. I wrote to you yesterday, and I write to you again to- night. If I waited three days, that is, till Wednesday, per- 56 LETTERS OF [1773 haps I should never answer your letter of the 10th, which M. d'Aguesseau brought me to-day. In the first place (for there may still, perhaps, be a future for me), I must ask you to address your letters direct to me; to send them through M. d'Aguesseau is to put one risk the more against me ; he may go into the country, or travel, etc. ; in short, it is enough that we are three thousand miles apart ; add nothing to them. Oh ! I shall surely seem mad to you : I am going to speak to you with the frankness, the self-abandonment one would have if death were certain on the morrow; listen to me,, therefore, with the indulgence and the interest that we have for the dying. Your letter has done me good ; I expected it still, but I had ceased to desire it, because my soul Could no longer have an emotion that resembled pleasure. Well, — shall I say it ? — you havfe given diversion for a few moments to the horror which absorbs my whole existence. Ah! my God! I fear for his life ; mine is fastened to his, yet I have need to talk with you. , Can you conceive what it is that impels me, that drags me towards you? Nevertheless, I am not content with your friendship; I, find a coldness, a carelessness ia not telling me why you did not write to me from Dresdefi as you promised ; and besides, you make me feel in too marked a manner that your regret at not finding in Berlin what you hoped for has destroyed the pleasure you would otherwise have felt at the expression and proof of my friendship ; and then too, — shall I say it ? — I am wounded that you have not thanked me for the interest that I take in you. Do you think it any answer to this that I am very unjust, very difficult to please ? No, I am nothing of all that ; I am very true, very ill, and very unhappy — oh, yes, %eTy imhappy. If I did not tell you what I feel, what I think,. I could not 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 57 speak to you at all. Do you believe that in the trouble in which I am one has the power to restrain one's self ? For example, ought I to be touched by your manner of saying to me, as to the Chief interest of my life, " Answer me on all this what you can, and what you like " ? Oh ! yes, what I like ! you leave me great liberty, but you see how I employ it, — not in criticising you, oiily in proving to you what you know even better than I : that we have the tone and expression of what we feel, and if I am not satisfied, it is not your fault — I know that well. But I claim nothing, imless it be that species of consola- tion which we so seldom allow ourselves : that of speaking out our whole thought. People are always restrained by a fear of the morrow ; I feel myself as free as though there were no morrow for me ; and if, by chance, I should live on, I foresee that I could forgive myself for having told you the truth at the risk of displeasing you. ■ Is it not true that our friendship must be great, strong, and complete, our intimacy tender, solid, close, or else, nothing at all ? Therefore, I can never repent having shown you the depths of my soul. If that is not what you want, if there be any contempt for it, well ! let us be sincere ; let us not be shamed or embarrassed ; let us return whence we started, and believe that we have dreamed. We can add this clause to the chapter of experi- ence, and behave in future like those well-bred persons who know it is not polite to tell their dreams. We will keep silence about them; sUence is pleasant when it comforts self-love ! You wiQ not teU me what rank you give me; are you restrained by a fear of giving me too much or too little ? that may be just, but it is not noble. Youth is so magnificent, it loves to give lavishly ; yet here you are as miserly as if you were old or rich. You ask the impossible ; you want me to 58 LETTKRS OF [1773 pity you because you do your ovm will ; I am to combat you to restore your native spirit. Eb ! mon Dieu ! a little while and I will answer for it that your nature will govern you despotically ; the habit of conquering will strengthen it, and there is little need of that! You have said to yourself (I have long been sure of this) that it mattered nothing whether you were happy so long as you were great. Let things happen ; I will answer for it that you will be consist- ent; there is nothing vague or wavering about you except your feelings; your thoughts, your projects are fixed in an absolute manner. I am much deceived if you were not t)orn to make the happiness of a vain soul and the despair of a feeling one. Own to me that what I am now saying does not displease you ; you will forgive me for loving you less when I prove to you that others will admire you more. You ask me a singular question, truly. You say, " Are there better reasons than myself for his absence?" Yes, there are better, — one indeed that is absolute ; one that if he succeeds in subduing it, the sacrifice of my whole life cannot repay the debt. All the circumstances, all events, all moral and physical reasons are against hini ; but he is so ardent for me that lie will not permit me to have a doubt of his return. Nevertheless, I shudder at what I may hear on Wednesday : he spits blood ; he has been bled twice ; at the moment when the courier left. him he was better; but the hemorrhage may return ; and how can I be calm with that thought before me ? He himself fears the result ; though be tries to reassure me, I detect his fear. Tell me if you know of whom I speak ; and further, did you know it when I wrote to ask .you for " Le Conndtable " X Is it delicacy or caution which makes you seem to ignore a name I have not mentioned to you ? But I am not speaking to you of your journey. If I could 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 59 believe that I shall live and that you will not go to Kussia, I should eagerly desire that you might be detained in BerUn. But as I think that you always feel the need of doing diffi- cult things, I would like, now that you are once started, that you should iaake the tour of the world, ^ — in order that it might once be done ; and then, could there be repose in the future 1 Hardly would you return before you would start for Montauban [where his father lived] ; and after that, other projects; for you cannot endure rest unless it be to make plans for tr&,Velling a thousand leagues. Yes, on my honour, I think it was a great misf ortxme for me the day that I spent one year ago at Moulin-JolL^ I was far indeed from needing to form a new attachment ; my life and my soul were so filled that I was very far from desiring a new interest ; and you, you had no need of this additional proof of what you can inspire in an honourable and sensitive person. Oh ! it is pitiful ! Are we free agents ? Can what is be otherwise ? Were you not free to tell me that you would write to me often ? As for me, I am not free to cease to desire it eagerly. Having thus scoMed you, I must add that you were very kind to write to me on your arrival; I deserved it, — yes, indeed I did. Thursday, June 24, 1773. Three times in one week ! It is too much, much too much, is it not ? But it is because I care for you enough to believe that I have made you imeasy. You must be feeling some impatience- to know if I am still living. Well, yes ! I am condemned to Hve ; I am no longer at liberty to die ; I should do harm to one who desires to live for me. I have news of him to the 10th; it does not altogether reassure 1 The house of the painter and litterateur, Watelet, on the banks ol the Seine, where she met M. de Guibert for the first time. The gardens of this place were famous as among the first to be laid out ii^the English "style. — Er. Ed. 60 LETTEES OF [1773 me, but I hope that his hemorrhage may not have fatal results ; I even hope it may hasten his return ; but this hot weather is a mortal injury to him, and I must wait. Ah ! mon Dieu ! always to see pleasure deferred, disap- pearing! always to be engulfed, overwhelmed by sorrow! If you knew what need I have of repose ! for one year I have been upon the rack. You alone, perhaps, have had the power to suspend my sorrow for a few instants; and that blessing of a moment has bound me to you forever. But tell me, — my last letter, did it displease you ? Do I not stand ill with you? I should be grieved were it so; but I am not like Mme. du Chatelet ; I know no repentance. Answer me with the same frankness that I employ to you ; esteem me enough not to tell me half the truth ; tell me all the evil you think of me ; and it is not, as M: de la Eoche- foucauld says, for the pleasure of hearing myself spoken, of that I ask you to tell me this ; it is to judge if you are my friend, if — in a word — you can he mj friend. I attach enough value to our intercourse to wish urgently to know what there may have been of sudden surprise, or mistake, in that which drew us to each other. It is said that nothing is stronger or better founded than the sentiments for which we can give no reason. If that is true, I ought to rely upon your friend- ship ; but you will not have it so ; why is that ? Shall I not be satisfied with it ? Do you not know that the natural impulse after we have acquired a new possession is to examine it, to observe it on all sides ; this occupation is perhaps the highest joy that possession gives ; but you, you do not know all the details and all the pleasures of sensi- bility. Whatever is elevated, whatever is noble, whatever is grand, that is your sphere. The heroes of Corneille fix your attention ; scarcely' do you cast your eyes on the little swains of Gessnet. You love to admire, and I, I have but one need, 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 61 one will, — to love. What does it matter? We may not have the same language, but there is a sort of instinct that supplies all ; nothing, however, can fill the chasm of a thou- sand leagues of distance ! I was so troubled the last time I wrote that I did not tell you Diderot was in Holland; he likes it so well, he has already so many friends whom he never saw before, that it is quite possible that he may not return to Paris, and even forget that he was on his w:ay to Eussia. He is an extraor- dinary man, not in his place in society : he ought to be the leader of a sect, a Greek philosopher, teaching, instructing youth. He pleases me very much, but nothing about him reaches my soul; his sensibilities are only skin-deep; he never goes farther than emotion. I like nothing that is half and half, nothing that is undecided and not thorough. I cannot understand the ways of people in society ; they amuse themselves and yawn, they have friends and they love -no one. All that seems to me deplorable. Yes, I prefer the torture that consumes my life to the pleasure that numbs theirs; with that fashion of being we may not be lovable, but we love, and that is a thousand times better than pleasing. How I should like to know if you are going to Eussia. I hope not, because, as you say, I desire it. Letters seem to me to come more slowly from Eussia than from any other part of the world. I have re-read, twice, thrice, your letter ; first because it was dif&cul't to read, next, because I was diffi- cult to please. Ah ! if you knew what faults of omission I found in it ! But why should you not make them ? M. d'Alembert is awaiting a letter from you with great impatience. M. de Crillon forestalled you. Your friend, M. d'Aguesseau seemed to me, at least on the day he brought me your letter, very extraordinary ; he had the air of a person in 62 LETTEES OF [1773 trouble ; his movements had something convulsive about them. He said he was ill, and I believe it ; he has a project of going to Spa. I do not know if he wiU, but I am glad he will not be with you. Adieu ; I have overwhelmed you with ques- tions to which you do not reply. I do not ask if you would like me to send you the news, because it would be out of my power to put my mind to such things ; but I know some- thing that the public does not yet know, nanaely : that M. d'Aranda is appointed ambassador from Spain in place of M. de Puentfes [father of the Marquis de Mora] and th8,t the latter is given the first place at his Court. AU this is, of no interest to you, and it may astonish you that it is of great interest to me. Must I not be foolish to interest myself in things that happen in Madrid ? Adieu again. My style of folly is equal to your piety. Send me news of yourself often and at length ; share, if you can, the pleasure that it will give me. How many letters do you receive that you are more eager to open than mine ? — three ? ten ? Thursday, July 1, 1773. Oh ! if you knew how imjust I am ! how I have accused you ! how I have told myself that I ought to expect and desire nothing of your friendship ! And the cause of it all was merely that I received no letters from you. Tell me why we expect, why we exact so much from one on whom we do not rely. Ah ! truly, I believe you will forgive my incon- sistencies ; but I, I must not be so indulgent ; they hurt me more than they do you. I no longer know what J owe to you ; I no longer know what I give you ; I only know that your absence is heavy upon me ; yet I cannot assure myself that your presence would do me good. Ah ! vion Dieu ! what a horrible _ situation is that in which pleasure, consolation, friendship^ all, in short, becomes poison ! What must I do ? 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 63 tell me ; how recover calmness ? I know not where to look for strength to resist impressions so deep and so diverse. Oh ! how many times we die before death ! All things dis- tress and injure me ; yet the liberty to deliver myself from the burden that is crushing me is taken from me. Laden with sorrow, there is one who wishes me to live ; I am torn both ways — by despair, and by the pity that another makes me feel. Ah-! my God ! can it be that to love, to be loved, is not a good ? I suffer every pain, and, more than that, I trouble the repose, I make the unhappiness, of the one I love. My soul is exhausted by sorrow ; my bodily frame is destroyed, and yet I live, and I must live. Why do you require it ? what matters my life to you ? of what value do you reckon it ? what am I to you ? Your soul is so busy, your life so full and so active, how can you find time to pity my woes ? and have you indeed enough feeling" to respond to my friendship ? Ah ! you are very amiable ; you have the tone of interest, but it seems to me it is not I who inspire it. My letters are neces- sary to you ; perhaps that is true — yes, as you say so ; but why be so long in writing to me ? and why not send your letters direct ? Strasburg delays them for two or three days. I am enchanted (and it was thus I intended to begin my letter) that you have been satisfied with the King of Prussia. "What you tell me of that magic vapour that surrounds him is so charming, so noble, so just, that I cannot be silent about it ; I have read it to all those who deserved to hear it. Mme. Geoffrin asked me to give her a copy. I have sent it far and near, and, it will be felt. So you are not going to Eussia ? I am glad. Let me tell you again how charming I find your friendship ; you answer me, you converse, you are still beside me though a thousand leagues distant. But how comes it that that woman does not love you to madness, as you wish 64 LETTERS OF [1773 to be loved, as you deserve to be ? how else can she employ her soul and her life ? Ah ! she has neither taste nor sensi- bility ; of that I am sure. She ought to love you, if only from vanity — but why do I meddle in all this ? You are satisfied, or if you are not, you love the ill she does you ; why, therefore, should I pity you ? But that other unhappy person ! it is she who interests me ; have you written to her ? is her pain as deep as ever ? I must tell you that the other day at Mme. de Boufflers much was said of you and " Le Conn^table," and the young Comtesse de BoufBers told me that she believed you were very much in love, and this belief had made her watch Mme. de . . . with great attention. A man present assured us that you no longer loved her ; you had done so, but the feeling had worn out, and he thought you would never be long happy or unhappy for the same woman ; he said the activity of your soul did not allaw it to fix itself long on one object ; and from that arose a witty discussion on matters of feeling and passion. The Comtesse de Boufflers finally said that she did not know who it was with whom you were in love, but it certainly was no longer Mme. de . . . and she judged, by the notes she had received from you at the time of your departure, that you were strongly attached to some one and that your absence from her rent your soul ; but then came the natural reflection : " Why does he go to Eussia ? " Perhaps to cure himself, perhaps to stifle the feelings of the woman he loves. At last, after many conjec- tures of no interest, I was asked if I liked you, if I knew you well, for until then I had not said a word : " Yes, I like him much ; after knowing him a little there is only one way of liking him." " Well, then, you know his intimacies ; who is the object of his passion ? " " No, truly, I know nothing ; except that he is now in Berlin and is well ; that the King of Prussia has received him admirably and is to show him his 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 65 troops ; after that, he goes to Silesia ; that is all I know, and all that interests me." After this we talked of the Opera, of Madame la Dauphine and of a thousand " interesting " things. I tell you all this to show you that I do not like society to gossip about your affections, your dislikes, your inconstancies. I like to hear only of your merit, your virtue, your talents ; am I wrong ? I have written three times to Berlin since the 6th of June. No doubt they will forward your letters; I remember the desire you will have to receive certain letters, " the de- privation- of which turned your head." For pity's sake do not treat me so well ; do not write to me first, because then (without beiag aware of it) you will write to me merely for the sake of saying you have written. Do not come to me until you have nothiag more to say to her ; that is in the order of things ; friendship comes after, sometimes at a great distance, sometimes verj"- near — too near perhaps — the un- happy love ! We love so much that which comforts us ! it is so sweet to love that which gives us pleasure. I do not know why it is, but something warns me that I shall say of your friendship what Gomte 'd'Argenson said on seeing, for the first time, his pretty niece. Mile, de Berville. " Ah ! " he cried, " she is very pretty ! let us hope she will give us many griefs." What do you think of that ? But you are so strong, so moderate, and above all so occupied, that you are equally sheltered from great sorrows and little griefs. That is how minds should be, how talents should be; it is that which renders human beings superior to events. And when, with that, a man is as honourable and, above all, as feeling as you are, he is no doubt painfully affected, — ■ enough so to satisfy ordinary friendship ; but he is soon diverted from the emo- tions of his soul when his head is eagerly and deeply 66 LETTERS OF [1773 occupied. I predict this of you, and I am glad of itj. you will never experience those sorrows which convulse the soul ;. you are young enough to still receive a few slight shocks, but, I answer for it ; you wiU' soon recover your balance ; ah, yes ! I answer for it, and you wiU make a great career and have a great celebrity — I shall horrify you, I shall show you a very paltry and common soul, but I cannot bear that idea. Every time that I think of you in the future I have an icy feeling ; it is not because what is great attracts admiration and crushes me, but because that which is great so rarely deserves to be loved. Admit that I am almost as silly as I am wild ; I am much worse than either.. I have that particular style which Vol- taire (I venture to name him) says is the only bad style ; I fathom you so well that I know I need not teU you it is the wearying style. The difference in our affections is this: you are at the other end of the world, you are calm enough to enjoy everything; whUe I am in Paris, I suffer, and I enjoy nothing; "that is aU," as Marivaux I have received many details regarding him. I see there is nothing now to fear from this last hemorrhage ; but ask yourself if it is possible to have a moment's peace while trembling for the life of one to whom one would sacrifice one's own life at every instant. Ah ! if you did but know how lov- able he is, how worthy of being loved ! His soul is gentle, tender, 'strong; I am certain he is the man in all the world who would please and suit you most. . . . It is you who give me faults ; you have that exclusive privilege. I am with all my other friends the best and easiest of beings ; .they always favour me, they forestall me in every way; I spend my life in thanking them and praising them, and I complain of you — but only to you. 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 67 I criticise you, I disapprove of you; why that difference? Can you believe that it is only one year since we first knew each other ? It seems to me impossible. Wednesday evening, July 14, 1773. Ah ! how amiable you can be, and how you surprise me by returning to me, being so occupied, so dissipated as you are ! How is it that you even think of one who can have no other merit in your eyes than that of seeming capable of loving and suffering ? Of what use to you are those sad faculties ? You have no need, of being loved, and you would be sorry to make me suffer ; what value can you place upon an intimacy where „ all the advantage is on my side only ? You ask me questions which I am not in a state to answer. Alas ! one must needs be calm to answer the questions of in- difference. Sorrow, the duration of suffering, have given me a species of stupidity which deprives me of the power of thinking ; all the reason left to me is enough (and no more) to judge myself, to condemn my emotions, and be sorry for all my feelings. My soul has continual fever with par- oxysms which lead me often to delirium.. Oh ! if it were true that excess of iU gives birth to good, I might hope for some relief. No, I can no longer bear the diverse agitations . that rend my heart, but I reproach myself for the weakniess that drags me into showing you what I suffer. It seems to me that I cannot excite your interest; I have no claim on your sensibilities ; and if I had, it is not with my sorrows that I ought to nourish them. No, you owe me nothing, and I will prove it to you : I detest, I abhor, the fatality which forced me to write to you that first note; yet at this very moment, perhaps, it is dragging me onward with the same power. I did not wish to speak to you of myself; I meant simply to thank you 68 LETTERS OF [1773 for writing to me before you reached Vienna. . I meant to answer you, not speak to you from myself. Of your praises I accept none, and I shall amaze you ; the reason is that they do not praise me. What matters it to me that you judge I am not silly ? It is strange, but never- theless true, that you are the man in the world whom I least care to please. Explain to me that singularity ; explain to me why I judge you with intolerable severity; why I find myself continually unjust to you; ^hy, not believing in your friendship, I cavil at all its expressions ; why,' in short, having reason to praise you, I am so tempted to find fault ? My reason teUs me I ought to ask your pardon because my thoughts insult you constantly, and my soul revolts at the mere feeling that you may be showing mercy to me. No, no ! I do not want it ; judge me severely ; see my injustice, my inconsistency, and let yourself follow the impulse that such a . sight must inspire in you. Ah ! as I have abeady told you, we cannot make of all this the friendship of Mon- taigne and La B^otie. They were calm ; they simply gave themselves up to the sweet and mutual impressions they received ; but we — we are ill, yet with this difference, that you are a sick man full of strength and reason, who will act in a manner to: soon enjoy the best of health ; while I — I am attacked by a fell disease in which all the reliefs that I have sought have turned to poison, and have served only to render my sufferings more acute. These are strange indeed; they deprave my reason, they lead astray my judgment, for I do not desire to be cured ; I am conscious only of the want to die. Ah! my G9d ! how sorry I should be to travel, to devour a hundred volumes in two months of time! how grieved I should be to be worth as much as you, to be des- tined to such success, such glory ! If you only knew how small my soul is I it sees but one thing only in all the world 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 69 that is worthy to occupy it. Caesar, Voltaire, the King of Prussia seem to it sometimes worthy of admiration, but never of envy. I should horrify you too much if I told you the fate I should prefer to all else that breathes ; yes, I am like F^lix — in Polyeucte : — " " I enter upon feelings that are not believable, Some I have are violent, othei's are pitiable; I have even some — " But you cannot understand that language ; I should make you blush for having thought that my soul had relations with yours. You do me too much honour in raising me to your '' level ; but avoid ever putting me beside the women you most esteem ; you would annoy them, and do me harm. You do - not know all my value ; reflect that I can suffer and die, and then ask yourself if I resemble those women who please and amuse themselves. Alas ! the one is as repugnant to me as v the other is impossible. I dislike whatever comes to distract and turn me from my one thought; there are objects that nothing can make me lose from sight. What I hear called dissipation, pleasure, only stupefies and wearies me ; and if any one had the power to part me a moment from my sorrows, I believe that, far from feeling grateful, 1 should hate him. What think you of that ? you who talk to me of my " happi- ness," and who lead me to hope that, if it depends on your friendship, you wiU give it to me. No, monsieur, your friend- ship will not give me happiness, for that is impossible ; it will console me, it may, perhaps, make me suffer, and I do not know whether I shall hereafter felicitate or pity myself most for what I owe to you. Why do you take the tone of justifying yoiuself for hav- ing read aloud the " Conn^table " ? It would have been disobliging to refuse a pleasure you could give and receive. The King of Prussia wrote a charming letter to M. d'Alem- 70 LETTERS OF [1773 bert, fvill of your praises, and he counted on hearing you read the " Conn^table." I am certain he will be delighted with it ; its tragedy is on the tone of his own soul in many ways. Adieu ; give me frequent news of you, and form no plan of writing me four lines. Keep that intention for your acquaint- ance ; some friends, even, may be content with it, but I am hard to satisfy. TeU me if you have received my letters. Paris, July 25, 1773. No, no! do not deceive yourself; the greatest distances are not those that Nature marks with milestones ; the Indies are not so far from Paris as the date of June 27 is far from that of July 15 ; there is veritable remoteness, horrible sepa- ration, forgetfulness of the soul ! it resembles death, but is worse, because it is felt so long. But do not think I reproach you — ah ! mon Dieu ! I have not the right ; you owe one nothing, and I ought to return you thanks for any mark of your remembrance. I knew from Baron de Koek that the camp manoeuvres would not take place. It is thought here that the Emperor and the King of Prussia have given themselves a rendezvous in some town of their new possessions ; but you have filled your time in a useful manner, so that you will regret the camps but little. What ! sincerely, do you really wish me to reduce you to my dimensions ? Is it because you find it easier to bend yourself than to raise me ? but from whatever level I look at you, you retain your own height, which is such that few men reach it. Permit me not to regard as a result of confidence and friendship what you tell me of your char- acter. Alas ! do you know what you reveal to me by disclos- ing the inconsistencies which agitate you ? It is that I am stupid, that I see nothing, observe nothing ; for, if you are neither false nor dissimulating, I ought to have discovered 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 71 what you think you now disclose to me of your own accord. Do you wish me to tell you something of profound wisdom ? It is that neither you nor I know you perfectly : you, because you are too near, and because you observe yourself too much ; and I, because I have always regarded you with fear and embarrassment. Oh! if ever I see you again, I will look better into you; it seems to me that my sight is growing keener. What you say about the cause of your continental journeys is charming, full of wit and grace, and that is surely enough to make us do without truth. " I fill my youth in order that my old age may not blame me for neglecting io employ it." You see you are like the miser, who, while his children are dying of hunger, justifies his cruelty in his own eyes by say- ing that he amasses wealth that they may enjoy it after him. Let us be more candid ; let us not seek a pretext to justify our tastes and our passions : you go to the ends of the earth because your soul is more eager than tender. Well, what harm in that ? You are young, you have known love, you have suffered, and you conclude from that that you have sen- sibility : it is not so. You are ardent, you can be impassioned, you are capable of all that is strong, of all that is grand, but you will never do any but things of movement ; that is to say, actions, detached deeds-; and such is not the way of sensibil- ity and tenderness. They attach, they bind, they fill the whole life; they leave no place for aught but sweet and peaceful virtues; they evade distraction; all that separates and removes them from their object seems to them misfor- tune or tyranny. Consider and compare these things. As I have already told you, nature has not made you to be happy,; she has condemned you to be great ; submit, there- fore, without a murmur. For the rest, I believe what you tell me about the advan- 72 LETTERS OF [1773 • tage of this country over that of all others. I do not know if you will briug back from your travels a disgust for travel- ling, but I am very sure you wiU have lost the power to settle yourself anywhere. You will have judged with justice and accuracy that which is good, that which is better, but you will do as the Italians do with music ; they prefer novelty to excel- lence. I beg your pardon for contradicting your words, but you must agree that I am truly on the tone of your soul. Do you wish me to talk to you of inine ? Here is the state of it. Have you ever watched those who are attacked by slow, incur- able diseases ? When you. inquire of those who are nursing them, the answer is, " As well as can be expected ; '' which means : " He must die, but he has a few moments of respite." That is precisely the state of health of my S9ul. To a most violent storm a calm has succeeded. The soul's condition of him I love is such as I could wish it, and according to my heart, but his health is alarming. Nevertheless, I am sure that he makes 'no mistakes of regimen. He clings to life because it gladdens him to love and to be loved ; he lives for that only. Oh ! if you knew how winning he is ! Yes, you might love me a little, but you would not think well of me for being capable of a faithless feeling to him. Oh ! who are you to have turned me for an instant from the most delight- ful, the most perfect of mankind ? Yes, if you knew him — when you know him — you will see that in the judgment I pronounce upon him there is neither illusion nor bias. The Chevalier d'Aguesseau will have written you that I had lost all patience. I sent to him to ask news of you and he had none at the moment, but as soon as he received your letter of the 8th he sent me word that you were welL I was tempted to write and thank you for having a friend to relieve me of anxiety ; but then I thought it better to wait till I heard from you. 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 73 Yes, I desire to wait for you — always. Why should I go faster than you ? I should only weary myself and clog your steps. I desire that no affections shall henceforth agitate me painfully : it is too much. I know not how I have sufficed so far. It is true that I have concentrated my strength on a single point. All nature is dead for me, except certain objects which fill and vivify every moment of my life. I exist for nothing else: things, pleasures, distractions, vanity, social opinion, all that is no longer of use to me ; I regret the time that I gave to it — though indeed it was very short, for I knew sorrow early, and it has this of good about it ; it averts many follies. I was trained by that great teacher of men, misfor- tune. That was the language that pleased you ; it touched the feeling spot of your soul, from which dissipation and the amiable social tone of this country is forever removing you. You were glad to have me bring you back to what you once loved, what you once suffered. Yes, there is a species of suffering which has such charm, which brings such sweetness into the soul, that we are ready to prefer that woe to all that is called " pleasure." I taste that joy — or that poison — twice a week ; and that sort of nourishment is more needful to me than the air I breathe. The Comtesse de Bouffiers talks to me much of you and of what she writes to you ; she likes you because you wrote " Le Conndtable," and that is indeed enough on which to found a .liking. Oh ! how small and narrow my soul is ! I hate the Patagonians and the LUiputians equally — but what are my likes and dislikes to you ? You are very amiable to have thought of making your writ- ing larger ; but I am inclined to complain of it, for it cuts me off a few lines. In God's name, stay what you are ; scribble as you please, travel roimd the world, but begin in Paris ; in a word, do not change a hair from your style of being. I do 74 LETTERS or [1773 not know if it is the best, but it is the most agreeable to me. Ts hot such praise insipid ? Do not laugh at me ; I am very silly, but I do assure ydu I am a good soul — am I not ? Sunday evening, August 1, 1773. You are too good ; you surprise me with kindness. It is delightful to have a pleasure on which we did not count, and I am charmed to owe you an emotion which has done good to my soul. I received yesterday a letter from you dated the 18th ; I was much pleased to see that your dates are getting closer ; you no longer put fifteen days' interval between them ; and I do not owe this change to the jegrets I expressed to you, but to you yourself, to your friendship : I like far better that which it gives me than that which I obtain myself. I wanted to thank you, to tell you feebly that which I feel so keenly, and now I am made more happy still, — I have received to- day another letter from you ! My first emotion (I know not why) was fear; the habit of ill-fortune spoils all things. But I was soon reassured. I found you kind, full of feeling, close to my soul. It seemed to me I ought to be glad for having suffered, as my suffering was of interest to you. Oh! with how many regrets you fill my life ! I might enjoy your friendship ; it might be my consolation, it might be my pleasure, but you are a thousand leagues away ! I cannot escape the fear that so many new objects, a life so filled and occupied as that you are forced to lead, may destroy, or at least weaken a tie and an interest to which there is lacking, perhaps, that degree of warmth which makes it a need of the heart, or, at any rate, a habit. I admit that I set but little value on that last tie, which is the sentiment of those who have noiie ; but see the baneful disposition of my soul : I fill myself with fears, re- grets, when I ought to enjoy these testimonies and proofs of 1773] MLLE. DB LESPINASSE. 75 your friendship. It is so sweet, so indulgent — that friend- ship ; you forgive me all my injustice ; I have blamed you a thousand times, but I have never repented giving myself up to you in the closest confidence. With you it is impos- sible to feel one's self mistaken, and thus one is sheltered from great evils ; for remark that all tragedies are founded on misunderstandings, and that almost all misfortunes have the same cause. But do not punish me for having been unjust by no longer telling me of that which interests you. Tell me all you feel and experience and I promise to share it, and to tell you the impression it makes upon me. I love j'ou too well to impose the least restraint upon myself ; I prefer to have to ask your pardon rather than commit no faults. I have no self- love with you ; I do not comprehend those rule^ of conduct that make us so content with self and so cold to those we love. I detest prudence, I even hate (suffer me to say so) those " duties of friendship " which substitute propriety for interest, and circumspection for feeling. How shall I say it ? I love the abandonment to impulse, I act from impulse only, and I love to madness that others do the same by me. Ah ! mon Dieu ! how far I am from being equal to you ! I have not your virtues, I know no duties with my friend ; I am closer to the state of nature; savages do not love with more simplicity and good faith. The world, misfortunes, evils, nothing has corrupted my heart. I shall never be on my guard against you ; I shall never suspect you. You say that you have friendship for me ; you are virtuous ; what can I fear ? I will let you see' the trouble, the agitation of my soul, and I shall not blush to seem to you weak and incon- sistent. I have already told you that I do not seek to please you ; I do not wish to usurp your esteem. I prefer to de- serve your indulgence — in short, I want to love you with all my heart and to place in you a confidence without reserve. 76 LETTERS OF [1773 No, I do not think you " sly " \_fin ] ; I think, as you do, that slyness is always a proof of famine of mind ; but I do think you stupid for not understanding that which has been clearly designated to you. What matters his name ? enough that it does not injure that which I have told you of himself. What surprises me is that I have named him to you a scojfe of times ; this proves to me, what I did not believe, that I can mention his name like that of any other man; but I shall be still more surprised if, when you return, you cannot distinguish him among the others ; for I assure you he is not made to be lost in a crowd ; you will see. I saw the Chevalier d'Aguesseau to-day, and was proud to be able to give him news of you. With the other persons who expect to hear from you I have a contrary feeling.. I fear to seem to them more fortunate than they, and thus get you blamed ; for most women have no need of being loved, they only want to be preferred. I shall be very glad to see the Chevalier de Chastellux once more ; still, if I could add to his journey what I desire to subtract from yours, T should not see him soon. Observe, I beg of you, how I reverse the chronological order : I have loved the chevalier these eight years. Adieu ; I have not told you that I am ill as a dumb animal ; but my soul suffers less, therefore I must not complain. Sunday, August 8, 1773. What folly to go in search of you, to send my letter to await you in Breslau, where you will be occupied with the king, the troops, your successes, etc., and nothing will incline you to cast your eyes on Paris. I am wrong; Paris is too grand to be forg(rtten, but me you wovdd overlook in the crowd. Nevertheless, if I did not fear to grieve you I should say : " There is no one who regrets you more sincerely than I." Every one is busy or dissipating. I alone, I believe. 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 77 cannot lose from sight that which distresses me, or that which I desire. I do not know how persons manage to grow used to privations; those that touch the soul are so keen! they have no" compensations. , I cannot believe that it is only three months since you departed ; still less can I conceive how I can wait for you till the end of November. Your presence could not fail to comfort me; I regret it as my pleasure. Ah! friendship, that .blessing of nature, is it to me a fresh sorrow ? Does all that affects my soul turn to poison ? You were to me a charm- ing acquaintance ; your tone, your maimers, your mind, they all pleased me ; a higher degree of interest in you has spoiled all : I yielded myself up to the good you did me. Ah ! why have you penetrated within my soul ? Why did you show me yours ? Why establish so intimate an intercourse between two persons whom aU things separate ? Is it you, or is it I, who are guilty of the species of pain from which I suffer ? Sometimes I am arrested in my desire for your return by the fear that you will wound my friendship ; and yet it is not exacting. You wUl be so occupied, so carried-away, so dissi- pated, that, perhaps, you may be as far from me in Paris as at Breslau. Well, so be it ; I shall see you seldom and await you often ; that will be something. But are you not thinking to shorten your journey rather than prolong it ? What can you see better or mo.re inter- esting than what you are now seeing in Silesia ? And then if you go to Sweden and do not write from there you wUl receive no letters ; we may be three months without news of you, and that would no longer be absence, it would be death. In a word, be it justice or generosity, I must have news of you, and there is neither reason nor pretext which can justify you for being so long without writing to me as you were between Prague and Vienna. Eeflect that you owe much to my con- 78 LiETTERS OS" [1773 dition ; I am ill, I am unhappy ; does not that solicit your goodness ? What it grants will be repaid by infinite grati- tude. Good God ! what a poor motive ! what a pitiable sentiment ! Do you npt think so ? I have just read an extract from the " Eulogy on Colbert " now competing at the French Academy. The tone of it seeded to me so firm, so noble, so lofty, so original, that I sud'denly wished it were yours. I do not know if the rest is as worthy, but you would not disavow the little I have seen of it.^ I have had fever for some days; the last time I wrote to you I finished my letter while trembling in a chill. There is a certain postman who, for the past year, has given fever to my soul, but now it has attained my poor body. I feel destroyed ; and I have always been so unfortunate that something tells me I shall die at the moment when my mia- fortimes end. Eetum, and at least I shall be sure of having tasted before I die a consolation very sweet to my souL I reproach myself for ever having been unjust to yon. Mon Dieu ! you have suffered, and you will pardon me ; there are situations which ask for so muph indulgence ! I have read the long-expected book of M. Helvetius [" Of Man ; his Intellectual Faculties and his Education," a post- humous work]. I was alarmed at its siae ; two volumes, of six hundred pages each ! Your voracity would have made an end of it in two days ; but as for me, I can no longer read with interest ; my affections withhold my attention ; I read what I feel, and not what I see. Ah ! mon Dieu ! how the mind shrinks - by loving ! it is true that the soul does not, ■ but what can one do with a soul ? 1 forgot to answer you about the affair of Comte de C . . . ; it is even less advanced than at first ; you could hardly believe what a poor creature he is on whom the matter depends ; he is not stupid, but the 1 It was by M. Necker, and took the prize. — I'r. Ed. ...oj MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 79 silliest of men. His wife is better than he ; but the absorp- tion she has in herself absorbs all her faculties. On the whole, they are persons whose real merit is to have a good cook. How many people of whom the world speaks well have no other value ! No, the human species is not wicked ; it is only silly, and in Paris it is as vain and frivolous as it is silly ; but no matter, provided what one loves is ■ kind, amiable, and excellent. Ah ! if you knew what amuses and attracts the public ! — a tragedy by M. Dorat (devoid of wit, interest, and talent), and next a comedy by M. Dorat, which is a masterpiece of bad taste and bad style ; it is an imintelligible jargon. The applause given to it really saddened me the other day; it is enough to discourage talent. , Sunday, August 15, 1773. Listen to me, and once for all believe that I cannot wrong you, and you know why I cannot wrong you. I have not been negligent ; this is my fifth letter since July 3d. I do not see why you had not received mine of July 15th on the 3d of August. I cannot endure the irregularities of the post; they are the torment of my life; but you surprise me, you, by attaching such" importance to my letters. How could you have the idea that I meant to harass you ? Punish you ? — and for what ? Supposing, what is assuredly not so, that I were dissatisfied with your friendship, have I the right to complain of it ? Would it not be the height of impertir nence to imagine 'that the loss of my letters was a painful privation to you ? If I tell you that I am not so foolishly - vain as most women, you are not obliged to believe me ; but know me better and you will find that I receive as a favour that which is given me ; that I enjoy it with feeling, and respond to it with all the tenderness and sincerity of my soul ; but never do I feel myself prompted by the sort of 80 LETTERS or [1773 confidence that is found, not in the heart, but ia a vanity that exacts from those we love, and sometimes dares to put them to the proof. Intercourse with the world has not altered the simplicity and truth of my sentiments. Eemark that I am not praising, but defending myself. I am sorry and uneasy about the pain in your leg ; you do not take care of it, though you say you do; and I am more uneasy at that than for the pain itself. Alas! the great evil of absence is ignorance of the details that touch us closely. While saying much, still more is left unsaid ; and it seems to me that my friend always omits that which I most need to know. Why do you wear yourself out with fatigue ? The loss of sleep exhausts the brain, and, strong as you may be, I am certain that by sitting up all night you do not get the best of the things and objects you are seeking to observe — not to speak of the risk you run of weakening your health. To reach the object for which you aim, you must not only live, but keep well ; in exalting the soul to the point of sacrificing all to its love of glory, I believe it is well to preserve the stomach. Ah ! if you knew how physi- cal sufferings belittle the soul you would not squander as you do your sleep and your strength. • I am speaking a very trivial language to you, but it is that of friendship. Eemark that those who wish to please never say a word of all this. The tone of interest has no grace, it is ponderous, it repeats itself — but it does not weary those who feel it for one who deserves it so well. I cannot help thinking that the uneasiness in which you were when you wrote to me disturbed your judgment- a little. You urged me to write to you without telling me where to address my letter. I know that you were not in Vienna after the 12th at the latest, yet I must send my letter there; there is no sense in that. And another thing, equally sense- 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 81 less, was writing to you at Breslau. But why, when making the tour of the world, should any one desire to hear from his friends ? Yes, you are very inconsistent ! in fact, there are moments when I am so weary that I am tempted to leave you on the way. I am ill, I am sad, and it seems to me that I should serve you best by letting myself be forgotten. The more kindness, the more feeling you might show me, the more I should dare to tell you that you will often repent having yielded yourself too quickly to an intimacy from which I alone obtain advantage. There is a clause in your letter on which I dared not rest my eyes, though my soul fastened on it. Mon Dieu ! what word was that you said ! it froze my blood ! No, no, my so^il shall seek for yours no more. Ah ! that thought will kill me ! Be my consolation ; calm, if you can, the trouble of my soul ; btrt do not think that I could, for one instant, survive a disaster the very fear of which fills my life with a terror that has destroyed my health and disturbs, incessantly, my reason. Adieu, I cannot continue ; my heart is wrung ; if I compose my mind I will resume ; because I must justify myself on the matter of which you speak, and ask your pardon, though I am not guilty. Still Sunday. I intended to warn you that I had repeated your remark on the King of Prussia, which was so charming that I thought I might do so without impropriety. It was thought what it is, and it went far and wide until it reached Mme. du Deffand, who thought it very bad, and twisted and commented upon it, and found, as she thought, many con- tradictions to it. She ended by saying that if your " Connd- table " were another " Athalie " it would not prevent her from thinking the form and basis of that thought of yours de- testable. Some days later she spoke of it in the same 6 82 LETTERS OP [1773 tone to the Neapolitan ambassador [Oaraccioli] ; this made him angry, and he told her that when people criti- cised they ought to quote honestly, and by changing the words of the speech he thought her criticism as unjust as it was severe. Mme. de Luxembourg and Mme. de Beauvau, before whom this occurred and who were against Mme. du Deffand, asked the ambassador for a copy of the actual remark; he promised it; then he came and told me the whole of this silly dispute, and I own that the pleasure of confounding Mme. du Deffand made me yield to his request. I copied the three lines _f or him and he went off triumphant. Mme. du Deffand was confounded ; at any rate she dared no longer disparage that which everybody else thought charm- ing. Until then, there had been no question to whom you had written it. She now took it into her head to ask that question ; the ambassador refused to reply, and this increased her curiosity. Finally, he said it was written to me, and added : " No doubt it was a presentiment that made you condemn a saying so full of wit and grace." — There 's a long tale ; I should have told you earlier, but it seemed to me rather paltry to send a thousand leagues. I must add that the ambassador brought the copy back to me, and I burned it. Just see what silly things occupy these people of the world ! what empty minds it proves ! Yes, unliappi- ness is good for something; it corrects the little passions which agitate the idle and the corrupt. Ah ! if they could only love, they would all become good. You can see, now, whether I was guilty of indiscretion. If you say I was, I shall believe it ; but do not tell me that people will think " we write to each other to say witty things." Ah ! what matter to us if fools and malicious peo- ple think so ? They are strong only when they are feared ; I hate and flee them, but I fear them no longer. For sev- 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 83 eral years I have so weighed and estimated those who judge that I dare not tell you the contempt I have for opinion. I do not wish to brave it, and that is aU. There is a passion that closes the soul to all the miseries which tortiure the people of the great world ; I have the sad experience of it. A great woe kills all the rest. There is but one in- terest, one pleasure, one misfortune, and a single judge for me in all creation. Oh ! no, I am not petty. Keflect that I hold to life at one point only; if it escapes me, I shall die. From this inward conviction, profound and permanent, you can readily believe that all else is annihi- lated for me. I know not by what fatality — or what good fortune — I became susceptible of a new affection: searching within myself I can neither find nor explain its cause ; but, such as it is, its effects have brought sweetness to my life. It seems to me an astounding thing that my sorrows should interest you ; it proves to me the goodness, the ^sensibility of your heart. I reproach myself, just now, for the remorse 1 have felt in yielding to my penchant for you : sorrow makes one severe to one's self ; I feel guilty for the good you do me. Is it now, or was it then that I made myself Ulusions ? On my honour I do not know. But you, whose soul is not convulsed by trouble, you can judge me better ; and when I see you, you will tell me if I ought to rejoice or despair at the feelings you inspire within me. — I received yesterday news of him which alarms me ; his health does not improve ; he is perpetually threatened by a fatal attack from which he has been twice at death's door within a year ; how is it possible that he should live ? Adieu; send me news of yourself. Monday, August 16, 1773. I open my letter to tell you how conscious I am of your kindness in being so uneasy at receiving no letter from me. 84 LETTERS OF [1773 I cannot imagine why ; for my friends take my letters them- selves to the general post-office. Why have you renounced your journey to the North ? I cannot believe it is solely to shorten the period of your absence. To whom are you mak- ing the sacrifice of Sweden ? If some one has exacted it, you are doubtless content. Well, if youx return is hastened I wiU love the person or thing that is the cause of it. But next year ? must^ you go to Eussia ? and must you not go at once to Montauban ? and then to that coimtry-seat where you will find pleasure and seek happiness, and then — and then — but no matter, anything is better than Sweden; and I know not — that is, something tells me, not to be anxious about what may happen next year; as you say yourself, there is time between now and then to die a hundred times. You have made me a reproach ; I have a mind to return it : are you guilty of what the Chevalier de Chastellux has writ- ten to me, namely, that I love you deeply 1 How does he know it ? I have given my secret to none but you and him to whom I tell all. Can it be that you have told the Cheva- lier ? If it were so, I could only thank you, and complain. M. d'Alembert is at this moment with Mme. Geoffrin. I do not doubt she will think it a pleasure to write to the King of Poland [Stanislas-Poniatowski]. It occurs to me that in this long letter I have omitted a rather interesting point : my health ; it is detestable ; I cough frightfully, and with such effort that I spit blood. I spend a part of my life unable to speak ; my voice is extinct, but this of all inconveniences is the one that suits the inclinations of my soul the best ; I like silence, meditation, retirement. I do not sleep, or scarcely so, and I am never dull. You will think from this that I must be very happy. If I add that I would not change my condition for that of any other living being you wUl think 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 85 me in paradise — and you will be wrong-; to go there one must die, and that is what I wish to do. But come ; and write me often, often. August 22, 1773. I received yesterday your letter of the 10th, and it has done me good. If you only knew what I have suffered dur- ing the last eight days! how wrung with grief my heart has been ! in what distress, in what alarms my life is spent ! I have no longer the liberty to free myself ; it is awful ; and it is not in the power of him I love to make my troubles cease. He k-nows them, he suffers from them, he is still more unhappy than I, because his soul is stronger, and has more energy, more sensibility than mine. For one whole year every moment of his life has been marked by misfor- tune ; he must die of it, yet he wills that I shall live. Oh ! my God ! my soul cannot suf&ce for what it feels and what it suffers. See my weakness, see how sorrow makes one selfish and indiscreet; I make you think of me, I sadden you perhaps. Ah ! forgive me ; this excess of confidence comes from my friendship, my tender friendship for you. You have shown me such kiadness, such indulgence that it seems to me I cannot abuse it. If you, alas ! were to suffer, who could feel and share it more than I ? You see within my soul, you know what it has for you. Ah ! I feel, at the summit of woe, invoking death at every instant, that it wiU cost me a regret to leave you ; you console me, and yet I sink beneath the weight of my sorrows — No, no ! they are not mine that rend me, they are his, for which I have neither remedy nor consolation: that is the torture of a feeling and devoted souL You have loved, you will under- stand and pity me. After what you wrote to M. d'Alembert I counted on seeing you by the end of September, and now I find you 86 LETTERS OF [1773 will not be here till the end of October; but -will you be here then ? Alas ! I know not if I may dare to hope so far before me. Perhaps I am speaking to you now for the last time. I dare not permit myself either hope or project. Ah ! I had suffered much from the injustice and malignancy of men ; they reduced me to despair ; but I here avow that there is no sorrow comparable to that of a deep, unhappy passion : it has effaced my ten years' early torture. It seems to me that I live only since I love; all that affected me, all that rendered me unhappy until then is obliterated ; and yet in the eyes of calm and reasonable people I have no sorrows but those I have ceased to feel; they call passion a ficti- tious sorrow. Alas ! it is because they love nothing, because they live only for vanity and ambition, and I, I live only to love; no longer have I the tone or the feelings of society. More than that, I am incapable of fulfilling its 'duties ; but fortunately I am free, I am independent, and in yielding myself up wholly to my inclinations I have no remorse, because I harm no one. But see how little you ought to think of me ; I reproach myself often for the kindness and the esteem that is shown to me ; I usurp so much in society ; people judge me too favourably because they do not know me. It is true that I have been so great a victim to calumny and the malice of enemies that I feel my present position to be a sort of compensation. May I make you a reproach ? my friendship misses your confidence ; you no longer teU me of yourself ; why is that ? I was unjust to you once, I know ; is it thus you punish me ? How is it that if you love yo.u have nothing to say to me ? You suffer, you hope, you enjoy ; why, then, do you teU me nothing ? You speak to me so little of yourself that your letters might go to nearly every woman of your acquaiat- ance. It is not so with mine; they can go to but one 1773] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 87 address. Am I wrong ? is it too much to exact equality in confidence? This is the fourth letter you have still to acknowledge, do not forget that. I think it was folly to have written to you at Breslau ; you may not have thought of the post and my letter will still be there. You must burn all my letters. I fancy that I see them falling in great bundles from your pockets ; the disorder in which you keep your papers affects my confidence — but you see it does not check it. Adieu. I have pain in my chest. Is your leg cured? Send me news of yourself. Monday, September 6, 1773. Your silence hurts me. I do not blame you, but I suffer, and I can scarcely persuade myself that if your interest were equal to mine I should be one month without hearing from you. Mon Dieu ! tell me, what value do you place on friend- ship if absence and travel distract you from it wholly ? Ah ! 'how, f ortvmate you are ! A king, an emperor, troops, camps, can make you forget the one who loves you and (more touch- ing perhaps to a feeling soul) the person whom your friend- ship sustains and consoles. No ; I do not blame you ; I even wish that your forgetfulness did not seem to me a wrong ; I should like to find within me the disposition that approves of all, or suffers all without complaint. I know not why I was persuaded that I should hear from you at Breslau whether you received my letter, or whether it were lost; my hope was balked. Oh! I hate you for making me know hope, fear, pain, pleasure ; I had no need of those emotions — why did you not leave me in repose? My soul had no need to love ; it was filled with a tender senti- ment, profound, participated, mutual, but sorrowful neverthe- less ; and that sorrow was the emotion that drew me to you. I meant that you should only please me, but you have 88 LETTERS OF [1773 touched me ; in consoling me you have bound me to you, and the singular thing is that the good you have done me, which I received without consenting to it, far from rendering me supple, docile, like other persons who receive favours, seems, on the contrary, to have given me the right to be exacting on your friendship. You, who judge from heights and see into depths, tell me if that is the action of an ungrateful soul, or of one too sensitive : whatever you say of it I shall believe. Eetum' speedily; I see the days slip by with a pleasure I cannot express. They say the past is nothing; but as for me, it crushes me ; it is precisely because I have suffered so much that it is so dreadful to me to suffer stilL Ah ! but there is madness in promisiug myself some sweetness, some consolation in your friendship ; you will have gained so many new ideas, your soul has been agitated by so many diverse sentiments -that no trace of the impression you received of my sorrow and _my confidence will remain. But come, come at any rate ; I shall judge, and I shall see clear — for illusions are not for the sorrowful. Besides, you have as much openness as I have truth; we shall not for one moment deceive ourselves ; come, therefore, and do not bring back from your journey the melancholy impressions the Chevalier de Chastellux has brought from Italy. He speaks of all that he has seen without pleasure, and all that he now sees gives him but little more. I would not change my ways of thinking for his, and yet I pass my life in convul- sions of fear and pain; but then, what I expect, what I desire, what I obtain, what is given to me, has such value to my soul! I live, I exist with such force that there are moments when I find myself loving madly to my own unhappiness. Ought I not to cling to it ? ought it not to be dear to me ? It caused me to know you, to love you, and, 1773] MLLE. DE LESPIXASSE. 89 perhaps, to have one friend the more — for you tell me so. If I had been calm, reasonable, cold, all this would not have happened. I should vegetate with the other women, who flirt their fans and discuss the sentence on M. de Morangies and the arrival of the Comtesse de Provence. Yes, I repeat it : I prefer my griefs to all that people in society call happiness and pleasure. I may die of them per- haps, but that is better than never having lived. Do you understand me ? are you on my key ? have you forgotten that you too have been as ill, but more fortunate than I ? Adieu ; I do not know how it is, I meant to write you four lines only, but my pleasure in doing so has led me on. How many persons are there whom you will see on your return with greater pleasure than you will me ? I will give you the list : Madame de . . . , the Chevalier d'Aguesseau, the Comte de Broglie, the Prince de Beauvau, the Comte de Eocham- beau, etc., etc., and Mesdames de Beauvau, de Boufflers, de Rochambeau, de Martinville, etc., etc. ; then the Chevalier de Chastellux, and then I, at last, the last. Ah ! see the differ- ence : I can name but one against your ten ; the heart does not conduct itself by law and justice; it is despotic and absolute. I forgive you ; but — return. M. dAlembert awaits you with impatience. The Cheva- lier de Chastellux is absorbed by the comedies at Mme. d'Epinay's, but his tone is cold and sad. Adieu ; do you really think that I shall see you in a month ? That is too far off to feel any pleasure from it yet. NoTember, 1773. Here I am : courage failed me ! When I have not what I love I prefer to be alone : I talk then to my friends more intimately, — more unreservedly. I have just written for three hours, and I am blinded by it, but not wearied. Mme. de BoufSers permits me to ask you for a copy of her letter; 90 LETTERS OF [1778 bring it to me to-morrow, I beg of you ; and bring me also the continuation of your journey which gives me such infinite pleasure. Is it in the morning or is it in the evening that I am to see you ? I should like the morning, because that is sooner, and the evening, because that is longer, but I shall like whatever you choose to give me. Adieu ; I did not sleep last night.. Half-past eight o'clock, 1773. Mon ami, I shall not see you, and you will 'tell me that it is not your fault ! but if you had had the thousandth part of the desire I have to see you, you would be here, and I should be happy. No, I am wrong, I should suffer ; but I should not envy the pleasures of heaven. Mon ami, I love you as one should love, to excess, to madness, with transport and despair. All these last days you have put my soul -to the torture ; I saw you this morning, and I forgot it all ! It seems to me that I cannot do enough for you in loving you with all my soul, in being in the mind to live and die for you. You are worth more than that ; yes, if I only loved you, it would be nothing ; for what is sweeter and more natural than to love wildly that which is perfectly lovable ? Mon ami, I can do better than love, I know how to suffer ; I know how to renounce my pleasure for your happiness. But there is one who troubles the satisfaction I should have in proving to you that I love you. Do you know why I write to you ? Because it pleases me ; you would never think it if I did not teU you. But oh! where are you ? If you are happy I must not complain that you have taken happiness from me. December, 1773. Good-morning, mon ami. Have you slept ? how are you ? shall I see you ? Ah ! take nothing from me ; the time is so short and I set such value on that which I spend in seeing 1773] MLLK. DE LESPINASSE. 91 you. Mbn ami, I have no opium in my head, nor in my blood ; I have worse than that, I have that which would make me bless heaven and treasure life if he I love were inspired with the same emotion ; but alas ! what we love is made to be the torment, the despair of the soul that feels ? Good-bye ; I want to see you, you ought to come and dine with me at Mme. Geoffrin's. I dared not tell you so last night. Yes, you ought to love me passionately; I exact nothing; I pardon all; and I have never had an angry feeling, mon ami ; I am perfect, for I love you in perfection. Four o'clock, 1773. You have not started ; at least, I hope not. This is what T fancy you will have said to yourself: "The weather is dreadful; I wUl go to-morrow to the country, I will be driven there ; I wiU see her this afternoon ; I wUl go and spend the evening with Mme. de V . . ." Mon ami, if you can reason thus, M. d'Alembert will permit you to argue in future, and you wUl not be reduced to making or not making Conn^tables. Racine would never have allowed any one to prevent him from writing his " Letters " on the Visionaries or his " History of Port-Royal." Here are the two volumes ; I warn you that if you lose them you will be lost in M. d'Alembert's opinion. Here is also Plutarch ; that is mine ; but, if it is aU the same to you, I would rather it were not lost or torn. I saw Mme. de M . . . at mass and spoke to her. Her face and figure satisfy the most fastidious and exacting taste ; but her tone, her manner, ah ! how repulsive they are ! Am I wrong? But her friend does not resemble her; yes, I believe this, and I even desire it ; is this feeling generous ? tell me. No, you shall never know all that the ambassador wrote 92 LETTERS OP [1774 to me ; but hear this : he said that, judging by appearances, M. de Gr . . . had obtained that which M. de M . . . had desired to obtain ; and then he added : " I am not afraid lest his piercing eyes should see these words ; I consent that those ■of M. de M . . . should read this letter as he reads your soul," etc. ; adding a hundred lively little jests very gay and clever ; he is certainly charming, but quite undeserving of being loved. — Mon ami, you advised me yesterday not to love you ; is it I or yomself whom you wish to save from that misfortune ? — tell me. I have an infallible remedy : how sweet it will be to me if I can think that I do anything for you. Mon ami, this soul which is like a thermometer, now at freezing, then at temperate, and a moment after at the burn- ing heat of the equator, this soul, thus carried away by an irresistible force, finds it hard to curb and calm itself; it longs for you, it fears you, it loves you, it wanders in a wilderness, but always it belongs to you and to its regrets. 1774; Mon ami, yesterday, coming home at midnight, I found your letter. I did not expect such good luck; but what grieves me is the number of days that must pass without my seeing you. Ah ! if you knew what the days are, what the life is, stripped of the interest and the pleasure of seeing you ! Mon ami, amusements, occupations, activity are all you need, but I, my happiness is you, and only you ; I would not wish to live if I could not see you, coiild not love you at every in- stant of my life.. Send me news of yourself, and come and dine to-morrow with Comte C . . . He asked me to -change from Sunday to Saturday; I said yes; but come there, I entreat you. I was to dine to-day at the Spanish ambas- sador's, but I have excused myself ; if you were to be there 1774] MLLE. 1)E LESPINASSE. 93 I would not have done so. Good-bye. I am expecting the letter you promised me. I am much hurried. 1774. I yield to the need of my heart, mon ami: I love you ; I feel as much pleasure and anguish as if it were the first and the last time in my life that I should say those words to you. Ah ! why have you condemned me to say them ? Why am I reduced to do so ? You will know some day — alas ! you wUl then understand me. It is dreadful to me to be no longer free to suifer for you and through you. Is that loving you enough ? Adieu, mon ami. At all the instants of my life. 1774. Mon ami, I suffer, I love you, and I await you. Tuesday, 1774. Mon ami, you make me prove that we like better to give than to pay our debts. I have several letters to answer, and to. come to them I must begin by talking with you. Mon ami, have you given me, since last night, one minute, two minutes ? Have you said, " She suffers, she loves me, and I must blame myself for a part of her sorrows " ? It is not to distress you or to give you remorse that I say that, but to make you kind, indulgent, and not angry when a few cries of pain escape me. As for me, I have thought of you, and much,, but my time has been occupied. — ■ Good God ! was there ever such pride, such disdain of others, such contempt, such injustice, in a word, such an assemblage and assortment of all that peoples hell and lunatic asylums? All that was last night in my apartment, and the walla and ceilings did not crumble down ; a miracle ! In the midst of the sorry writers, smatterers, fools, and pedants, among whom I spent my day, I thought of you alone d4 LETTERS OF [1774 and of your follies ; I regretted you ; I longed for you with as much passion as if you were the most amiable, most reasonable being that existed. I cannot explain to myself the charm that binds me to you. You are not my friend ; you can never become so : I have no sort of confidence in you ; you have caused me the deepest, sharpest pain that can afflict and rend an honest soul ; you deprive me at this mo- ment, and perhaps forever, of the only consolation that heaven granted to the few remaining days I have to live, — how shall I say it ? You have filled all ; the past, the pre- sent, and the future present me nothing but pain, regrets, remorse. Ah ! mon ami, I see, I judge it all, yet I am drawn to you by an attraction, by a feeling which I abhor, but which has the power of a curse and a fatality. You do well not to consider me ; I have no right to require anything of you ; for my most ardent wish is that you were nothing to me. What would you say of the state of a most unhappy being who showed herself to you for the first time agitated, convulsed by feelings so diverse and contradictory ? You would pity her ; your heart would be stirred ; you would want to suc- cour, to comfort that unfortunate creature. Mon ami, it is I; this sorrow, it is you who have caused it; this soul of fire and pain is your creation (ah ! I stUl think you godlike), and you ought to repent of your work. When I took my pen I did not know one word of what I should say to you ; I meant only to tell you to come and dine to-morrow, ^Wednesday, at Mme. Geoffrin's. I meant to show you that you alone of all my friends oblige me to wait for what I earnestly desire, " Le Conn^table." It is mine ; I might have refused to give it to you, and now it is I who persecute you to return it. Ah ! mon Dieu ! neither cares, nor interest, nor attentions, nor any desire to please, — occasion- ally a kindness that resembles pity ; and with it all, or with- 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. % out it all, I love you wildly. Pity me, but do not tell me so. Bring back my letters ; yes, do that. Three o'clock, 1774. It was not myself who answered you. If you love me it must have made you uneasy, and I shall be grieved to have / caused you a pain I could have avoided. I was in a state of / anguish, like the agony of death, preceded by a fit of tears ") which lasted four hours. No, never, never did my soul feel - such despair. I have a sort of terror which bewilders my reason. I await Wednesday, and it seems to me that death itself is not sufficient remedy for the loss I fear ; it needs no courage to die, but it is awful to live. It is beyond my strength to think that, perhaps, the one I love, he who loved me, will hear me no more, will never come again to succour me. He views death with horror because the thought of me is added to it. He wrote me on the 10th, " I have in me that which will make you forget all that I have made you suffer ; '' and that very day the fatal hemorrhage struck him down! Ah ! mon Dieu ! you who have known passion, despair, can you conceive my sorrow ? Pity me so long as I shall live, but never regi-et the unhappy being who has existed eight days in a state of suffering to which thought cannot attain. Adieu. If I must live, if my sentence is not pronounced, I may still find sweetness, charm, and consolation in your friendship; will you preserve it for me ? 1774. I distrustful, and of yx)u ! Think with what complete sur- render I have given myself to you ; not only have I put no distrust, no caution, into my conduct, but I should not even know regret or remorse if it were pay happiness alone that I had compromised. Oh ! mon ami ! I know not if I now 96 LETTERS OF [1774 love better, but he who made me unfaithful and guilty, he for whom I live after losing the object and interest of every mo- ment of my life, is he who has had most empire over my soul, he who has taken from me the liberty to live solely for an- other and to die when neither hope nor desire remains to me ! ^ No doubt I have been held to life by the same spell that drew me towards you, that potent charm attached to your pres- ence, which intoxicates my soul and bewilders it to such ex- cess that the memory of my sorrow is effaced. . Mon ami, with three words you have created a new soul within me, you have filled it with an interest so keen, a sentiment so tender, so profound, that I lose the faculty to recall the past and to foresee the future. Yes, mon ami, I live in you ; I exist because I love you ; and that is so true that it seems to me impossible not to die if I should lose the hope of seeing you. The happiness of having seen you, the desire, the expectation of seeing you again aid and sustain me against my grief. Alas ! what would become of me if, instead of hope, I had only the sorrowful regret of not seeing you ? Mon ami, with you I have not been able to die, without you I neither could — nor would I — live. Ah! if you knew what I suffer, what dreadful laceration my heart feels when I am left to myself, when youi- presence, or your thought no longer sustains me ! Ah ! it is then that the memorj' of M. de Mora becomes a senti- ment so active, so piercing, that my life, my feelings cause me horror. I abhor the aberration, the passion that made me guilty, that made me cast trouble and fear into that sensitive soul that was all my own. Mon ami, do you conceive to what point I love you ? You ' The MarquiB de Mora died at Bordeaux, May 27, 1774, on his way from Madrid to Paris, drawn there by his passionate desire to return to Mile, de Lespinasse. — Ek. Ed. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 97 divert the regrets, the remorse, that rend my heart : alas ! they would suffice to deliver me from a life I hate ; you alone and my sorrow remain to me ia this wide world ; I have no more interest in it, no ties, no friends, and I need none : to love you, to see you, or to cease to exist — that is the last and only prayer of tay soul. Yours does not respond to it, I know ; but I do not complaiu of that. By a strange caprice, which I feel but cannot explaiu, I am far from desiring to find in you that which I have lost : it would be too much ; what human being has better felt than I all the value of that life ? Is it not enough to have blessed and cherished that nature once ? How many thousands of men have crossed this earth without compare to him ! Oh ! how I have been loved ! A soul of fire, full of energy, which had judged all things, estimated all things, and then, turning away revolted by all, gave itself up to the need and joy of loving — mon ami, that is how I was loved. Several years went by, filled with the charm and the sorrows inseparable from a passion as strong as it was deep, and then you came to pour poison into my heart, to ravage my soul with trouble and remorse. My God ! what have you not made me suffer! You tore me from my feeling, but I saw you were not mine. Do you not see the whole horror of that situation ? How is it that I have lived through such woe ? How can one stOl find gehtleness to say : " Mon ami, I love you, and with such truth and tenderness that it is not possible your soul be cold as it hears me " ? Adieu. Eriday, after post time. You are " displeased ; " see if you ought to be ; what soul have you ever inspired with a stronger or more tender feel- ing ? Men ami, in whatever way you regard and judge my soul, I defy you to find anything in it to displease you. Oh I SS LETTERS OF [1774 I am sure of it; never have you been so loved. But do not make me say why — I cannot write to you where you are ; I dare not acknowledge to myself the reason ; it is a thought, an emotion, on which I do not wish to dwell j it is a sort of torture which horrifies me, which humiliates me, and one which I have never yet known. You ask me how I liked the habit of seeing you daily. Oh, no! it was not a habit; it never could become one. How cold such colours are, how monotonous ! they cannot be compared with the violent and rapid emotions which the name and presence of the one we love excite. No, no, I have not been happy enough to give myself the illusion that you would come and see me; thus I did not hear the opening and closing of my door. But. without interests, without desires, what matters it what people see or hear? Given over to my regrets, I feel but one need ; I implore either you or death. You soothe my soul, you fill it with so tender a sentiment that ^t is sweet to live during the time that I see you ; but there is nonght but death that can deliver me from misery in your absence. Midnight, 1774. So you have forgotten, abandoned, that fury, so foolish and so wicked both ! but had you left her in hell itself she would not complain;, the heat and activity of that abode would make her live. Instead of that, the unhappy creature spent her day in purgatory; she awaited a consoling angel who did not come. He was no doubt making the happiness and joy of some celestial being, himself intoxicated with the joys of heaven. In that condition what could recall me to him ; and if in truth he is really happy, I desire, from the bottom of my soul, that nothing may remind him of me ; for I am sufficiently unjust to detest his happiness and to wish that remorse and repentance may, pursue him perpetually. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPlNASSE. 99 I wish Mm worse still, namely : tliat he may love no more, and that he may henceforth inspire indifference only. Those are the prayers, that is the wish of the soul that has loved him best and has the greatest need of extinction forever. 1774. I am alone at this moment and I wish to tell you at once that I do not coimt upon you to go to the Duohesse d'An- ville'Si You will be always agreeable to me, but seldom useful, and I wish I could add, little necessary. In trying to restoi'e my confidence, you prove to me how justly my dis- trust was founded ; for I stUl miss three letters, one> espe- cially, in which I spoke to you of Gonsalve [M. de Mora]. You wUl doubtless find those three letters in some pocket of your portfolio; perhaps they are with that fourth volume that I ought to receive to-day. I notice that you make it your pleasure to pay attentions to Mme. de . . . ; you give, and lend her, whatever gives you pleasure ; to me, it is the oppoisite extreme, — negligence, forgetfulness, refusal. It is three months since you promised me a book which belongs to you; I have now borrowed it from some one else. No doubt it is best that this dis' obliging manner should fall on me ; that is only right, and I complain solely of the excess of it. Good-night ! If work costs you your nights, you must regret very much the use- less visits that fill your days. Among the letters you have sent back to me one is not mine ; but I swear that I will never return it to you. 1774. Eeturn to me the two old letters. I am not asking you for those of Cicero or Pliny. I desire not to see you, never to see you again. Eegret is better — is it not ? — than remorse. At the moment when you receive this I will wager that 100 LETTERS OF [1774 you have already received a note in which you were told ... I don't know what. Eh ! mon Bieu ! believe her, give her peace, and if it is possible, be happy yourself: that is the wish, that is the prayer of the unhappy woman who has always before her eyes the dreadful inscription on the portal of heU : " Give up all hope, ye who enter here." I have no hope, and I wish for none. I ought to have annihilated myself on the day I was left solitary. You prevented it, and you cannot now console me. May 11, 1774. You do not know me yet; it is almost impossible to wound my self-love ; and the heart is so indulgent ! In fact, the party of last night was like those insipid novels which make the author and the readers yawn together. However, one must say with the Ktag of Prussia, on a rather more memorable occasion, " We will do better next time." That which makes an epoch remains in the memory, and you wUl never forget in future that the day on which Louis XV. died you spent the evening at a party in a sound sleep. Believe me, there are recollections more painfulTihan that. Good-bye. Eleven o'clock at night. 1774. I will wager that you are not as sleepy to-day as you were yesterday at the same hour ; and the reason is very simple ; you are being amused, interested, and you have the desire to please. Mon ami, you were not made for privacy ; you need expansion; movement and the hurly-burly of society is necessary to you ; this is not a need of your vanity ; it is that of your activity. Confidence, tenderness, forgetfulness of self and of vanity, all those blessings felt and appreciated by a tender and passionate soul, clog and extinguish yours. Yes, I repeat it : you have no need of being loved. What a 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 101 strange mistake was mine ! and / dare to blame certain per- sons for lack of discernment ! I dare to tell them that they observe nothing and do not know men. Ah ! how misled I was ; mistaken to excess ! How is it that my intelligence did not check my soul ? How can it be that; judging you incessantly, I was, nevertheless, always carried away ? You do not know the half of your ascendency over me ; you do not know what you have to conquer each time that I see you ; you have never suspected the sacrifices that I make to yoii; you do not know the degree to which I renounce my own self in order to be yours. I say to you with Phfedre, " Often was I forced to deprive myself of tears." Yes, mon ami, I deprive myself, with you, of all that is most dear to me. I never speak to you now of my regrets, nor of my memories ; and, what is more cruel still, I let you see but a part of the feelings with which you fill my heart. I restrain the passion you excite in my soul ; I say to myself incessantly : " He will not respond to it, he will not under- stand me, and I should die of pain." Can you conceive, mon ami, the species of torture to which I am condemned? I have remorse for what I give you, and regrets for what I am forced to keep back. I give myself up to you, but I do not give myself up to my own feeling for you ; yielding to you, I nevertheless battle within myself. Ah! can you under- stand me ? can you know through thought what I feel, and what you have made me suffer? Yes, you will have a return towards me, because you have the sensibility that feels an interest in the unhappy and pities them. But I know not why I thus unbosom myself for an in- stant; I know that I shall find no comfort in your heart. Mon ami, it is empty of tenderness and feeling. You have but one means of liftiug me from my troubles : it is that of 102 LETTERS OF [1774 intoxicating me, and that remedy has been the greatest of my misfortimes. Good^night, mon ami; send me news of yourself; my foot- man has orders to return for, your answer. Tell me what you expect to do to-morrow ; tell me if I shall see you : I would rather it were not in the morning, because I must then receive a long and wearisome visit ; but I want to see you nevertheless. Eemember that on Saturday and Sunday I shall be deprived of that happiness. Adieu again ; I am much fatigued. I have seen, I think, forty persons to-day, and I desired to see but one — one whose thoughts very certainly have not been turned even once to me. Mon ami, if you were happy I would approve of your manner of living; but this vagueness, this void, this agitation, this perpetual movement, this habit of being neither occupied by work nor inspired by feeling, this con- tinued expenditure which impoverishes, with no return in pleasure, or reputation, or iutereBt, or fame ! — ah ! mon ami, you do not deserve that Nature should have treated you so well ; she has been prodigal towards you, and you are but a spendthrift. But I, I ruin myself for you, and it oppresses without enriching you. Yes, I weary you; you feel a dis- gust for my letters, and in that I admire the correctness and delicacy of your taste ; but while I esteem such good taste I grieve that you have almost no indulgence or kindliness. Four hours after midday, 1774. Certainly, mon ami, I do not keep to the lex talionis at this moment, for it is not with me that you are occupied. Eh ! mon Dieu ! how could you think of me in the midst of so many and such charming objects of distraction, when I cannot keep your thoughts fixed when we are t^te k tSte ? Do you know why I prefer to see you in the evening ? Be- 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 103 cause those hours put a stop to your activity. There is no way then of going to see Madame Such-a-one, or Gluck, etc., or of doing a hundred useless things, in which you seem to take an interest solely to leave me earlier. Do not think that these are reproaches ; they are only remarks which I cannot, with the, degree of interest that I feel, prevent myself from making. But I am so far from wishing to exact any- thing that I teU myself, a hundred times a day, it is myself over whom I ought to hold empire ; I ought to reduce my feelings to the poiat where, not having sufficient force to wring the soul, we claim nothing and are gratefid for all ; in other words, if passion be in my soul I ought to conquer it rather than seek to make you share it. And do you know, mon ami, what it is that may enable me to find the strength to do so ? It is the inward conviction which I have that it is not in you to make the happiness of an active and pas- sionate soul. I shall not say to you what it would be so natural to think, namely : that I am not made to inspire a deep sentiment ; that I ought not to pretend to please, to fix a heart. All that is true, no doubt ; but it is not that which makes me tell you that it is not in you to make the happiness of a strong and feeling soul. I wUl give to that soul the face of Mme. de Forcalquier, the nobleness of Mme. de Brionne, the graces of Aglag, and the wit of Mme. de . . . adorned, or rather, grafted with that of Mme. de Boufflers, and when I have composed that perfect being I say again that it is not in you to make her happiness, Why so ? Ah ! why ? — because, with you, loving is a mere incident of your age, and is not a part of your soul, though it agitates it occasionally ; your soul is, above aU things, lofty, noble, grand, active, but it is neither tender nor impassioned. Ah ! believe me, I am in despair at seeing to such depths ; I have such need of loving, such pleasure in loving that 104 LETTERS OF [1774 which I find worthy of love. It is so impossible for me to love moderately that the greatest misfortune that could hap- pen to me would be to discover in you that which alone could arrest, and perhaps extinguish, my feeling ; for, I will own it honestly, I do not find it in .me to love alone. With the opposite conviction I have the strength of the martyrs ; I fear no sort of sorrow. While suffering, and suffering much, I can still cherish life, still adore and bless him who makes me suffer ; but only on condition of being loved — loved from attraction; not from gratitude, from delicacy, from virtue, — all that is detestable ; it can only wither and cast down a feeling soul. Ah ! let us never make of the greatest blessing that Nature has bestowed upon man a thing of pity. Mon ami, there are moments when I feel myself your equal. I have strength, elevation, and a sovereign contempt for all that is vile and unworthy ; and I have also a con- tempt for death so fixed in my soul that, under whatever aspect it presents itself, it cannot frighten me for an instant ; in fact, it is almost always an active want within me. From this knowledge that I have of myself and of you, I say to you again : Let us love each other, or let us part forever ; let us put truth and generosity into our conduct, and esteem ourselves enough to believe that all is possible to us except deceiving each other and living in that state of trouble and fear which comes, necessarily, from the imcer- tainty of being loved. In that state, mon ami, one has confidence neither in one's self nor in the one we love ; we enjoy nothing. For example : at this moment I desire pas- sionately that you may return to-night from Auteuil [Mme. de Bouffler's country-seat], and then, a moment later, it seems to me that I wish you to remain there. Can you conceive the suffering caused by this inward combat between 1774] kLLE. DE LBSPINASSE. 105 the desire of the soul and a will which comes only from re- flection ? Conclusion : I love you to frenzy, and something tells me it is not thus that you ought to be loved. That some- thing makes such noise around my soul that I am ready to hush all else, and give myself up completely to that dreadful ' truth. Mon ami, I send you back your works that you may be yourself their censor :' put the last touches to them, and be assured that no one in the world attaches as much value as I to all that you do, and all that you are capable of doing. Without being vain; it seems to me one could put one's vanity, pride, virtue, pleasure, in short, one's whole existence, into loving you ; but that is not whdt I was saying just now. No, but then I was saying what I thought, what I knew, and now I am carried away into telling you what I feel. My soul is so strong to love, and my mind is so small, so weak, so limited, that I ought to forbid myself aU expressions and actiops that do not come from my heart. It is my heart that speaks when I say to you : " I await you, I love you, I would fain be wholly yours, and die." Adieu ; here come visitors. I am so occupied with you, I am so deeply filled with my regrets, that society is nothing more to me than importunity and constraint. There are but two ways of living that now seem good to me, — to see you, or to be alone ; but alone, without books, without lights, without noise. I am far from complaining of my sleepless- ness, it is the good time of my twenty-four hours. Observe, I beg of you, how much it costs me to quit you ; whereas you have no impulse towards me — not a thought ! Are you the happier for that ? Yes. Friday, 1774. How kind of you to send me an account of what you do, of what you are thinking, of what occupies you ! How I love 106 LETTERS OF [1774 the ardour, the activity of your soul and of your mind ! Mon ami, you have so many ways of attaining glory that you ought not to desire that of war. Give yourself up to your talent, your genius ; write, and by enlightening and interest- ing men you will acquire the most flattering of all fame to a sensitive and virtuous soul ; by thus doing good you will enjoy the best-deserved celebrity, — in truth, the only desirable celebrity in this age, where the choice lies between that and baseness and frivolity. Ah! how dreadful it would be to me to live again the Ufe I led for ten years. I saw vice in action so closely, was so often the victim of the base and petty passions of persons of society, that I stUl retain an in- vincible disgust and fear, which make me prefer complete solitude to an odious existence. I am dying of a desire to see your play ; you must have created the subject [Anne Boleyn], for in itself it does not seem to me to admit of interest and action in more than a few scenes. You wUl have all the more merit in seizing and inter.esting attention during five acts ; Eacine had that magic art in " B^rdnice." Your subject is grander and nobler, and ■well on the tone of your soul. You will not need to rise to heights, for you are always, without effort, on the level of what seems exalted to common and vulgar souls. Yes, mon ami, my days are as usual ; but I shall soon be alone : all my friends are leaving Paris, and for the first time in my life their departure does not cost me a regret ; and, if it did not seem too ungrateful, I should tell you that I could see M. d'Alembert depart with a sort of pleasure. His pres- ence weighs on my soul ; it makes me dissatisfied with my- self : I feel myself unworthy of his affection and his virtues. Judge, therefore, of my condition of mind, when that which ought to be a consolation adds to my unhappiness — but I do not want to be consoled ; my regrets, my memories are dearer 1774] MLLE. DE LBSPINASSE. 107 to me than all the attentions and the support of friendship. Mon am, my soul must either be lifted wholly out of its sorrow (and none but you have the power to do this) or it must make that sorrow its sole nourishment. If you knew how empty and cold books seem to me ; how useless I feel it to talk and answer ! My first impulse is to say to myself : Why should 1 1 what is the good of it ? and I have not yet found an answer to that question ; which results sometimes in my being two hours without saying a word, and for a month past I have not touched a pen except to write to you. I know well that such a manner rebuffs friends : but I consent to that ; my soul is inured to hardships, it fears no little woes. Ah ! how sorrow concentrates us ! how little we need when we have lost all! What blessings I owe you, Trwn ami; what mercies I ought to return to you ! You have restored life to my soul ; you have made me feel an interest in await- ing the morrow ; you promise me news of yourself : that hope fixes my thoughts. You promise me still more ; I am to see you ; but I shall say to you like Andromaque, " T.o less favours than that the unhappy lay claim." Adieu ; I abuse both your time and your kindness ; but it is sweet, it is natural to forget all with those we love. My wound is so sharp, my soul is so sick, my body so suffering that, were you susceptible of pity only, I am sure you would be beside me, seeking to pour into my heart the balm of tender- ness and consolation. Thursday, after post time. WeU ! I have had no letter, and that surprises me less than it grieves me. You have seen the chevalier and he will have given you news of me. I was not well the day he came. I am better now, but yesterday I received a violent shock. I had a con- versation, I heard tlie details, I saw bis band-writing once 108 LETTERS OF [1774 more, and I read words which I ought not to survive. Ah ! my blood, my life would be a poor price to pay for such feelings as his; see, therefore, how I must judge of yours. The Abbd Morellet told me a few days ago, in the tuno- cence of his heart, that you were in love with the young Com- tesse de Boufflers ; that you were really much occupied with her ; that you had the strongest desire to please her, etc., etc. If it is not all true, it is so probable that it seems to me I ought to complaiu only that you did not take me into your confi- dence. To acquit you towards me I ask of you only one thing, and that is, to teU me the truth. Believe that there is no truth, none, that I cannot bear. I may seem to you feeble, enough so to make you think you ought to spare me, but it is not so. On the contrary, never did I feel more strength. I have the strength of suffering, and I can fear nothing more in this world, not even the harm you think yourself obliged to do me. Adieu. July 6, 1774. How little I see of you, how badly I saw you to-day, and how painful it is to me not to know where you are at this moment ! I hope at Eis, and that you will return by to- morrow evening. They say the Comte de Broglie is expected here to-morrow morning. It is singular that I should be led to concern myself about his return, and to desire it may be earlier than his friends themselves desire. Mo% Dieu ! how a sentiment, a feeling changes and upsets aU ! That " I " of which F^nelon speaks is a myth. I feel in a positive manner that I am not I, I am you ; and in order to be you, I have no sacrifice to make. Your interests, your affections, your happi- ness, your pleasures, — iu them, mon ami, is the /that is dear to me, that is within me ; all else is external and foreign to me ; you alone in the universe can hold and occupy my 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 109 being. My thought, my soul can henceforth be filled by you alone, and by my harrowing regrets. No, it is not when 1 compare you with myself that I fear, that I grieve lest I be not loved. Alas ! it is when I think of what I was, and of him by whom I was — but to that un- speakable happiness I had no claim, and you see now that I did not deserve it. Oh ! how my soul suffers, how painful these memories are ! Mo% ami, what will become of me when I see you no more, when I await you no more ? Do you be- lieve that I could live ? the thought kills me. But tell me why I need no courage to die, and yet have not the strength to say to myself that a day wUl come, a moment, when you will speak to me a word that wUl make me shud- der. Mon ami, never speak it ; it brings evil ; that dreadful word will be my doom ; if I hear it, I die. How can you praise me for loving you ? Ah ! the merit, the virtue would have been in resisting the inclination, the attraction that drew me to you. But how could I fear, how foresee when guarded by a sentiment, by a grief, and by the inestimable blessing of being loved by a perfect being ? Mon ami, it was this that surrounded my soul, this that defended it when you brought into iC the turmoil of remorse and the heat of passion ; and you praise me for loving you ! Ah ! it was a crime ; and the excess of it does not justify me. But I shaU horrify you ; I am like Pyrrhus, and I " yield to the crime as a criminal." Yes, to love you, or cease to live — I know but that one virtue and law of nature; and the feeling is so true, so in- voluntary, and so strong, that, in truth, you owe me nothing. Ah ! how far I am from exacting, from claiming ! Mon ami, be happy; find pleasure in being loved, and I acquit you. — I am beside myself, I cannot speak to you of what I feel ; I Want to tell you that I have seen the chevalier. He 110 LETTERS OF [1774 asked news of you ; lie asked if I were satisfied with you ; how kind of him ! he wants all my friends to love me as well as he does ; could you do that ? He came yesterday and re- turned this evening. So we shall go to Auteuil Thursday ; be punctual to the rendezvous at my house from midday to half-past twelve. Gome, mon ami, come. Be kind, be generous, and give me all the moments that are not employed in your pleasures and your affairs; I wish, I ought, to come after those. 1774 I have four letters to answer ; I have tried to write, but it is impossible. My mind is occupied with you. I do not know if I love yoUj but I feel, only too much, that you trouble, you agitate my soul in a painful and sorrowful way when I do not see you, or am not buoyed up by the pleasure and activity of expecting you. Mon ami, in the days when people believed in witchcraft I should have explained all that you have made me experience by saying that you had the power, to throw a spell upon me which lifts me out of myself. But if that were so, if you had that power, how cruel I should think you for not prolonging the illusion which makes me fancy, at least for a few moments, that life could be a blessing. Yes, a blessing! I owe it to you that I have tasted that pleasure which intoxicates the soul to the point of taking all feelings of pain and sorrow from it. But ought I to render thanks to you for that ? the charm ceases the moment that you leave me ; I find myself again overwhelmed by regret and remorse; the loss that I have met with rends me. All that I havte read is feeble and cold in comparison with the love of M. de Mora; it fiUed his whole life; you can judge, therefore, how it filled mine. 1774J MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. Ill Eegret for such a love would suffice to make the sorrow and the despair of a tender soul. Ah ! but I suffer more cruelly still from the remorse that weighs upon my soul; I see myself guilty, I feel myself unworthy of the happiness I once enjoyed : I failed a man, the most virtuous, the most tender of men ; in a word, I failed my own self, I lost my own esteem ; judge, therefore, if I ought to claim yours ; and if you do not esteem me is there any means of blinding me to the point of believing that you can love me ? After this knowledge of myself and the reflections it brings with it, do you think there can ever be a creature more unhappy ! Ah ! mon ami, that mobility of soul for which you blame me, and which I admit, serves me only when I see you. It is that which has brought my life to a single point : I live in you, and by you ; but, besides that, do you know what that mobility does for me ? It makes me fezperienee in one hour all the classes of torture which can rend and cast down the soul. Yes, that is true : I feel sometimes the torpor, the despondency of death, and at the same moment the violent convulsions of despair. This mo- bility is a secret of nature which makes one live with greater force in a single day than the majority of men would feel in a lifetime of a hundred years. It is true that this same mobility, which is only one curse the more to sorrow, is sometimes the soiu'ce of much pleasure to a calm disposition ; it is even, perhaps, a means of being agreeable, because it is one way of making vanity enjoy itself and of flattering self- love. I have felt a himdred times that I pleased by the impression I received of the charms and wit of the persons with whom I was; and, in general, I am loved because others believe and see that they are making an efi'ect on me ; and not because of the effect I make on them. That proves both the insufficiency of my mind and the activity of my 112 LETTERS OF [1774 soul, and in these observations there is neither vanity nor modesty — but truth. Mon ami, I would like to tell you the secret of my heart as to the slight impression you say you made upon me with the idea of a separation for four months. Here is what I promised myself : to yield wholly to my • grief and to the invincible distaste that I feel for life. I believed that when my soul floated no longer between the hope and the pleasure of seeing you, of having seen you, it would have more strength than it needed to deliver me from a life that can offer me henceforth nothing but regrets and remorse. That, I swear to you, is the thought that has filled my mind for the last two months; and this deep and active need to be de- livered from my troubles has sustained me and protects me still against the grief that your absence would make me feel. Do not conclude from this that I love you with much passion : no, mon ami ; it proves only that I cling ardently to my pleasure, and that this gives me the strength to suffer. I have already told you that two sayings are graven on my heart, and they pronounce my sentence: to love you, to see you, or to cease to exist. After that, say all the harm you will of my sensibility ; never have I sought to combat your ill opinion of me ; 1 have not thought you severe or unjust. You alone in the world have the right to disesteem me and to doubt the force and truth of the passion that inspired me during five years for him who loved me. Four o'clock, 1774. I left you last night because I thought I wearied you with talking so long of myself ; but listen to me now, be- cause it is of you that I wish to speak ; but first and above all, believe, I entreat you, that I am not seeking to re- 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 113 proach you ; I do not think I have the right to do so, and I should be grieved to displease you. The interest that I bear you makes me suffer from a thousand things that are of no account to you ; one must love, to be aware of the harm one does to those who love us ; the mind alone does not give the delicacy with which one ought to treat a sick and unhappy soul. But exordiums are wearisome ; let us come to the fact. Mon ami, you wish to keep the object of your journey a secret from me ; if it is a good object why do you fear to tell it to me ? And if this journey will shock my heart, why make it ? If you do not owe your love to me, you owe it to yourself to be honourable and not deceive me. Never do you give me an unreserved confidence ; what you say to me seems to escape you, and as if you hardly consented to let it do so. You started yesterday, and you did not tell me where you were going ; I do not now know where you are ; I am completely ignorant of you, and of your actions.^ Mon ami, is that the behaviour of even the commonest friend- ship ? And do you believe that I can thiuk without pain, that of your own free will you will be twelve days without hearing of me ? Do you suppose that I was not distressed when, knowing you were about to leave me, you would not give me your last evening in Paris ? If you loved me you would have seen the hurt you gave me when you told me, Saturday evening, that the next day you should spend with Mme. d'Archambal. I did not find a word to say in reply, but I suffered. 1 M. de Guibert had gone to the country-seat of the father of the young lady he thought of marrying. The name of the place was Courcelles, near Gien, and the name of the lady, who soon after became the Com- tesse de Guibert, was Alexandrine-Louise Boutinon des Hays de Cour- celles. Her portrait by Greuze is celebrated, and has been in various Exhibitions. — Fb. Ed. 114 LETTERS OP [1774 Eleven o'clock at night, 1774. . I have no news of you; I hoped for none, and yet I awaited some. Ah ! mon Dieu ! how can you say that pain is no longer in my soul ? I fainted from it yesterday ; I had a crisis of despair which gave me convulsions that lasted four hours. Mon ami, if I must tell you what I believe, what is true, it is that I love you to madness, to the poiut of believ- ing that I never loved better, but — I have need of your presence to love you ; all the rest of my life is spent in remembering, in regretting, in weeping. Yes, go : teU me that you love another ; I desire it, I wish it ; I have a wound so deep, so lacerating, that I can hope for no relief but that of death. The relief that you have given me is like the effect of opium ; it suspends my sorrow, but does not cure it ; on the contrary, I am feebler and more sensitive in consequence. You are right, I am no longer capable of love ; I can only suffer. I did find hope in you, and I gave myself up to it ; 1 thought that the pleasure of loving you would calm my sorrow. Alas ! in vain do I flee it ; it recalls me incessantly ; it compels me ; it leaves me but one resource. Ah ! do not speak to me of that which I find in society ; society has become to me an intolerable re- . straint ; and if I could induce M. d'Alembert not to live with me, my door would be closed. How can you suppose that the productions of the mind would have more empire over me than the charm, the consolation of friendship ? I have the most worthy friends, the most feeling, the most virtuous. Each, in his own way and according to his own tone, would fain reach my soul ; I am filled with a sense of so much kindness' but — I remain unhappy : you alone, mon ami, have the power to make me know happiness. Alas ! it holds me to life whQe invoking death ! But why have you set such value on being loved by me ? 1774] MLM. DE LESPINASSE. 115 You had no need of it ; you knew well that you could not return it. Have you played with my despair ? Either fill my soul, or torture it no longer ; act so that I may love you always, or that I may never love you ; in short, do the im- possible, — calm me, or I die. At this moment what are you doing ? You are bringing trouble into a soul that time was calming ; you abandon me to my sorrow. Ah ! if you had feeling, you would be to be pitied, mon ami, you would know remorse. But at least, if your heart cannot fix itself, devote yourself to your talent, occupy yourself, work to some purpose ; for if you continue this desultory, restless Kfe, I fear you wiU some day be re- duced to say, — " The desire for fame has worn out my soul." Saturday, in the evening. It was not until this morning that I received news of you, and I, do not know whence or how it came ; certainly not by the post. Believe me crazy if you choose, think me unjust, in short, what you please ; but it wiU jiot prevent me from teUing you that I think I never in my life received so sharp, so blasting an impression as that your letter made upon me. I felt crushed by having ever given to any one the right to say to me what I was reading ; and to say it with such ease and so naturally that I must conclude the writer was simply pouring out his soul in speaking to me, without one thought that he insulted me. Oh ! how well you have avenged M. de Mora ! How cruelly you punish me for the delirium, the distraction that dragged me towards you ! How I detest them! I will enter into no details ; you have neither enough kind- ness nor enough feeling to allow my soul to lower itself to complaint ; my heart, my self-love, all that inspires me, 116 LETTERS OF [1774 all that makes me ,feel, think, breathe, in a word, all that is I, is shocked, wounded, and offended forever. You have restored to me enough strength, not to endure my sorrow (it seems to me greater and more crushing than ever), but to se- cure myself from ever again beiug tortured and made unhappy by you. Judge of the excess of my crime and the greatness of my loss. I feel, sorrow does not deceive me, that if M. de Mora were living and could have read your letter he would forgive me, he would console me, and hate you. Ah ! mon Bieu I leave me my regrets ; they are a thousand times more dear to me than what you call your sentiment ; that is dreadful to me ; its expression is contemptuous, and my soul repels it with such horror that that alone assures me my soul is worthy of virtue. . Were you even to think that you have done justly by me, I prefer to leave you in that opinion rather than enter upon any explanation. The matter is ended ; be with me as you can, as you please ; for myself, in future (if there is a future for me) I shall be with you as I ought always to have been, and, if you leave no remorse within my soul, I hope to forget you. I feel that the wounds of self-love chill the soul. I do not know why I have let you read what I wrote you before I received your letter ; you will see there all my weakness ; but you will not see all my misfortune: I hoped nothing more from you; I did not seek to be consoled. Then why should I complain ? Ah, why ! because the patient doomed to death continues to expect his doctor ; because he lifts his eyes to his, still seeking hope; because the last impulse of pain is a moan, the last accent of the soul is a cry : that is the explanation of my inconsistency, my folly, my weakness. Oh ! I am punished ! 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 117 Eleven o'clock, 1774. Have the delicacy to cease persecuting. me. I have but one wish, I have but one need : it is not to see you again in private- I can do nothing for your happiness, I know nothing with which to console you : leave me therefore, and do not any longer take pleasure in iorturing my life. I make you no reproaches ; you suffer, I pity you, and I shall not speak to you again of my sorrows. But in the name of that which still has some empire over your soul, in the name of hon- our, in the name of virtue, leave me, and count no longer upon me. If I can calm myself, I shall live ; but if you con- tinue to act as you do, you will soon reduce me to the strength of despair : spare me the grief and the embarrassment of order- ing my door to be closed to you during the hours when I am alone. I request you, and for the last time, not to come to me except between five o'clock and nine. If Mme. de . . . could read my soul, I assure you she would not hate me ; at the most, I have put a few regrets into hers : but you and she have made me feel the tortures of the damned, repentance, hatred, jealousy, remorse, con- tempt of myself, and sometimes of you — in short, all the misery of passion, but never that which makes the hap- piness of an honourable and sensitive soul. This is what I owe to you : but I forgive you. If I clung to life I should not be so generous ; I ^ould vow to you an implacable ha- tred. But soon I shall no more cling to you than I do to life, and I wish to employ" my soul, my sensibility, all that remains to me of existence in loving, adoring the only being who ever truly iilled my soul, and to whom I owe more happiness and pleasure than almost any one who ever walked this earth has felt or could imagine — and it is you who made me guilty towards that man ! that thought sickens my soul ; I- turn away from it. I wish to calm myself, and, 118 LETTBKS OF [1774 if I can, to die. I repeat to you, and it is the last cry of my soul to you : in pity, leave me ; if not, you wiU know remorse. 1774. Mon Dieu ! how you trouble my life ! you make me pass through in one day the most contrary conditions ; sometimes I am carried away by passionate emotion ; then I turn to ice at the thought that you will not respond to me. Then this last reflection makes me angry with my own nature, and to recover a little calmness, I abandon myself to the heart- rending memory of him whom I have lost. Presently my soul is filled with gentler feeling ; I am in a state to dwell on the few moments of happiness that I have tasted in loving. All these thoughts, which ought to take me farther from you, bring me closer. I feel that I love you, and so much that I can have no hope of repose except in death. That is my only support, the only help that I expect, the need of which I feel in almost all the moments of my life. Mon ami, you have shed a balm on the little wound I gave myself last night; this proves the truth of what M. d'Alembert asserts, that there are circumstances in which pain is not pain. Yes, you shall have the Eulogy before midnight. I have sent to the Archbishop of Toulouse [Lomdnie de Brienne] to return it. Adieu, once more, mon ami; you cause my silence, my sadness, my unhap- piness ; in a word, it is you who give life to my soul, and my soul drags me onward. I dare not tell you to what point I love you. Ten o'clock, 1774. You do not care to see me again to-day ; you are sufficiently indifferent to me, so that I need not fear to disturb the interests that are agitating you. Listen to me, and let us make a com- pact with each other, such as Mme. de Montespan proposed 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 119 to Mme. de Maintenon. Being forced to take a rather long journey with her tete k tete, "Madame," she said, "let us forget our hatred, our quarrels, and be good company to one another." Well ! I say to you : " Let us forget our mutual dis- pleasure, and do you be docile enough to bring back to me ■what I asked you for." Yes, it is I who am speaking to you, and I am not mad ; at any rate, my madness is of a kind less harsh and more unhappy. August 25, 1774. Yes, mon ami, that which has most force, most power in natuse, is assuredly passion; it has just imposed upon me privation, and it enables me to bear -it with a thousand-fold more courage than reason or virtue could inspire. But pas- sion is an absolute tyrant; a tyrant that makes slaves of those only who hate and treasure, by turns, their chaiu, and never have strength to break it. It commands me to-day to pursue a conduct absolutely the contrary to that I have prescribed to myself for the last two weeks. I see my own incon^stency ; I am ashamed of it, but I yield to the need of my heart. I fihd a sweetness in being weak, and though you may abuse it, mon ami, I will love you, and will say it to you sometimes with pleasure, oftener with pain wjien I think you will not respond to it. Listen to all I have suffered since you left me. An hour after your departure, I learned that you had hidden from me that Mme. de . . . had started the night before. Then I believed you had delayed your departure on her account. I judged you with a passion the true character of which is never to see things as they are. ■ I saw and believed all that could distress me most : — I was deceived ; you were guilty, you had come to bid me adieu in the very act of abusing my tenderness. That thought roused my soul to indignation, it irritated my self-love; I felt myself at the summit of un- .120 LETTERS OF [1774 happiness ; I coxild love you no longer ; I athorred the mo-, ments of pleasure and consolation which I owed to you. You had snatched me from death, the sole resource, the sole sup- port which I had promised myself when I trembled for the life of M. de Mora. You made me survive that dreadful moment ; you filled my soul with remorse, and you made me experience a greater misfortune still — that of hating you ; yes, 'mon ami, hating you. For eight days I was filled by that horrible sentiment, although during that time I received your letter from Chartres. The need of knowing how you were iu health made me break a resolution I had form'ed to open no more of your letters. You told me that you were well ; you informed me that, in spite of my request, you had taken some of my letters, and you quoted a verse from " Zaire," which seemed to sneer at my unhappiness ; and then — what hurt me most of all — the regrets expressed in the letter seemed vague, and more fitted to relieve your soul than to touch mine. In a word, I made poison of all you said to me, and more than ever I resplved not to love you, and to open no more of your letters. I kept that reso- lution, which rent my heart and made me HI. Since your departure I am changed and shrunken as if I had had a great illness. Ah ! this fever of the soul, which rises to delirium, is indeed a cruel illness; there is no bodily frame robust enough to bear such suffering. Mon ami, pity me ; you have done me harm. I received your letter from Eochambeau only on Saturday. I did not open it, and as I put it away in my portfolio, my heart beat violently : but I commanded myself to be strong, and I was. Ah ! how much it cost me to keep that letter unopened ! how many times I read the address ! how often I held it in my hands ! at night, even, I felt the need of touch- ing it. In the excess of my weakness I told myself I was 1774] MLLB. DE LESPINASSE. 121 strong, that I resisted my greatest pleasure, and — see my sort of madness ! — I loved you then more actively than ever. Nothing, for six days, could distract my miad from that sealed letter ; if I had opened it the moment I received it, its impression could not have been so sharp nor so profoimd. At last, at last, yesterday, receiving no letters from Chante- loup, from which place you had promised to write to me, I was struck with the thought that you might be Ul at Eoohambeau, and, without knowing what I was doing, nor to what I yielded, your letter was read, re-read, wetted with my tears, before I thought that I was not to read it. Ah! mon ami, how much I might have lost! I adore your sensibility. What you teU me of Bordeaux opened a wound that is not yet closed, and never wiU be.^ No, my life will not be long enough to mourn and cherish the memory of the most sensi- tive, most virtuous man who ever existed. What an awful thought ! I troubled his last days. Fearing to have to com- plain of me he exposed his life to come to me, and his last impulse was an action of tenderness and passion. I do not know if I shall ever recover strength to read again his last words. If I had not loved you, mon ami, they would have killed me. I shudder still ; I see them ; and it is you who made me guilty ; it is you who made me live ; it is you who brought trouble into my soul ; it is you that I love, that I hate, you who rend and charm a heart that is wholly yours. Mon ami, do not fear to be sad with me ; that is my tone ; sadness is my existence ; you alone — yes, you alone have the power to change my disposition ; your presence leaves me neither memories nor pain. I have experienced that you can divert even my physical sufferings. I love you, and all my faculties are employed and spell-bound when I see you. 1 M. de Mora died at Bordeaux. — Te. 122 LETTERS OF [1774 Friday morning, August 26, 1774. Mon ami. I was interrupted yesterday. There is so much news, so much going and coming, such joy, that one hardly knows whom to listen to. I should like to be glad, but that is impossible. A few months ago I should have been trans- ported at both the good to be hoped and the evil from which we are delivered ; at the present moment I am glad only by thought, and by reflection of the tone of all I see and aU I hear. You know that M. Turgot is made controller- general [in place of the Abb^ Terrai], — he enters the Council ; M. dAngeviUiers has the department of buildings; M. de Miromesnil is Keeper of the Seals ; the chancellor is exiled to Normandy; M. de Sartine has the navy, but they say it is only while awaiting the department of M. de la Vrillifere; M. Lenoir is lieutenant of police ; M. de Fitz-James does not go to Bretagne ; it is the Due de Penthifevre who is to hold the State Assembly with M. de Fourgueux — But I am really as piquante as M. Marin, from whom they have taken the Gazette to give it to an Abbd Aumont, because he told old news. Not to return to this matter I must add that the Baron de BreteuH goes to Vienna, and M. de la Vauguyon to Naples. Now let us pass to social news. Yesterday M. dAlem- bert had the greatest success at the Academy. I was not a witness of it, being too ill ; I had only strength to sit in my usual chair. He read his Eulogy on Despr^aux [Boileau] and some anecdotes about Fenelon, which they say were delightful. I would not listen to them this week, having my head full of that letter I did not open. One needs calm- ness to listen ; consequently, I listen very little. Mon ami, they are printing a life of Catinat : the author is a M. Turpin, who did the " Life of the Great Cond^." M. dAlembert has read it, and from what he says I judge it will take neither 1774] MLLB. DE LESPINASSE. 123 the piquancy nor the merit from your " Eulogy of Catinat ; '' as soon as it appears I will send it to you. I have seen a great deal of Mme. de Boufflers since your departure, and I shall either humble or exalt your vanity by telling you that she never once named you. If that is natural, it is very cold ; if there is a plan, it is very warm. We spent an evening with her, we went to the fair together, she came to see me, and we are all going to the catafalque. But for my benefit alone are some excellent pine-apples which she has sent me, and a letter of four pages on public affairs, on the glory with which the Prince de Conti has covered himself, and on her step-daughter, — not to speak of very flattering praises for me. I shall make you die of jealousy some day when I read it to you ; but before then you will coquet and please and fascinate so many that my successes wUl seem nothing. But, mon ami, why did you not write me from Chanteloup ? ^ have you already nothing to say to me? The post leaves every day, and if it did not, what matter ? the letter would be in the post, and you need not be a centiuy deprived of the pleasure of talking with one who loves you : remark .that I dare not say " one whom you love.'' If you arrive Tuesday after the courier from Bor- deaux, I shall have to wait till Wednesday, and that is hold- ing me in purgatory after keeping me for fifteen days in hell. If you receive this letter in Bordeaux, as I do not doubt you will, I retract and will ask you to go and see that con- sul : perhaps I shall thus obtain more details. He wiU teU you of the most lovable, most interesting of beings, whom I ought to have loved solely, whom I should never have injured if, by a fatality I detest, I had not been unable to escape a 1 Where M. de Guibert often went, as was then the fashion, to Tisit the Due de Choiseul in his popular exile to his country-seat of that name. — Fb. Ed. 124 LETTERS OF [17.74 new form of evil — for there is little that I have not experi- enced. Some day, mon ami, I will tell you things that are not to be found in the novels of Provost or Eichardson. My history is made up of fatal circumstances which prove to me that the true is often the most unlikely. The heroines of novels have little to say about their education; mine deserves to be written down for its singularity. Some even- ing, next winter, when we are very sad and inclined to reflec- tion, I will give you the pastime of listening to. a written paper which would interest you if you foimd it in a book, though it will inspire you with a great horror of the human species. Ah ! how cruel mankind are ! tigers are kind compared with them. I ought naturally to devote myself to hating; I have ill-fulfilled my destiny; I have loved much and hated little. Mon Dieu ! mon ami, I am a himdred years old; this life of mine which looks to be so uniform, so monotonous, has been a prey to all misfortimes, exposed to aU the villanous passions which stir the un- worthy — but where am I wandering ? wholly given to you whom I love, who sustain and defend my life, why do I oast my eyes on objects which made me detest it? Saturday, August 27, 1774. Mon ami, I have no news of you. I said to myself a hundred times : " He must have arrived very late ; he would not think of the value of a single hour to me." That makes a difference of four days ; I am now postponed till Wednesday ! Well ! the pains I have taken not to let my soul rest on that hope have served for nothing. The courier has arrived ; I received three letters ; but I could not read them because yours was missing. Mon Dieu ! you are neither happy enough nor unhappy enough to experience that feel- ing. Mon ami, if I do not hear from you next Wednesday, 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 125 I will not write to you again. You have done me one wrong, but if you do me a thousand more, I here declare to you that I will not forgive you, and that I shall not love you less. You see that I am talking to you of the impossible: the logic of the heart is absurd. In God's name, act so that I shall never reason more wisely. How much you are missed at this moment ! the excite- ment is general, won ami. There is this difference between my state of mind and that of all the persons I see : they are transported with joy at the happiness they foretell, while I only breathe the freer for our deliverance from eviL Hon Bieu ! my soul cannot rise to joy ; it is filled with regrets and heart-breaking memories ; it is stirred by a sentiment that troubles it; that often gives it violent emotions, but very rarely any pleasure. In such a state, public joy is only felt by thought and reflection; reasonable pleasures are so moderate ! my friends are displeased that they cannot drag me, into enthusiasm. " I am very sorry," I say to them, " but I have no longer the strength to be glad." Nevertheless, I am very pleased that M. Turgot has already dismissed a scoundrel, the man of the wheat affair [treasurer of the king's granaries]. I must tell you of a compliment the fish- women paid to the king [Louis XVI.] on his fSte-day : "Sire, we have come to compliment Your Majesty on the hunt you had yesterday; never did your grandfather have a better." The Comte de C . . . , who is at Martigny with M. de Trudaiue, has written me three pages full of enthusi- asm and transport. How happy they are ! hope keeps them young. Alas ! how old one feels when one has lost it, when nothing remains but to escape despair ! Tell me if you are writing many verses ; if you are getting a habit of making haste slowly, if you have resolved to do like Racine, who wrote poetry reluctantly. Mon ami, I impose 126 LETTERS OF [1774 upon you the pleasure of reading, and re-reading every morn- ing a scene of that divine music ; then you must walk about, and then compose verses, and with the talent that nature has given you to think and feel strongly, I will answer for it that you will make very noble ones. But what am I doing ? Advising a man who has a great contempt for my taste, who thinks me a fool, who has never seen me sensible about any- thing, and who, judging me thus, may perhaps be sensible himself and show as much accuracy as justice. Adieu, mon ami. If you loved me I should not be so modest; I should feel I had nothing in all nature to envy. I wrote you a volume yesterday to Bordeaux. That name is dreadful to me ; it touches the sensitive and painful nerve of my soul. • Adieu, adieu. ' Monday, August 29, 1774. You know that M. Turgot is controller-general, but what you do not know is the conversation he had with the king on the subject. He had shown some reluctance to accept the of&ce when M. de Maurepas offered it to him on behalf of His Majesty. The king said to him, " So you do not wish to be controller-general?" "Sire,'' replied M. Turgot, "I must admit to Your Majesty that I should have preferred to keep the ministry of the navy, because it is a safer office and I could be more certain of doing well in it ; but at such a moment as this it is not to the king I give myself, it is to the honest man." The king took both his hands, and said, " You shall not be mistaken." M. Turgot added : " Sire, I must represent to Y. M. the necessity of economy, of which Y. M. ought to set the first example ; the Abb^ Terrai has no doubt already said this to Your Majesty." " Yes," replied the king, "he has said it, but he has never said it in the way that you have." AU this is just as if you had heard it, for M. Turgot never adds a word to the truth. This emo- 1774] MLLE. BE LESMNASSE. 127 tion of the soul of the king gives great hope to M. Turgot, and I think that you will have as much as he. M. de Vaines is given the place of M. Leclerc [head-clerk of the Treasury] ; but there will be no luxury, no show, no valet de chambre, no audience, in a word, the greatest simplicity, that is to say, the style of M. Turgot. Yes, I assure you, you are much missed here ; you would have shared the trans- ports of the universal joy. People begin to feel the need of silence to compose themselves and let them think of all the good they expect. The personal interests remain, which must always be counted for something. The Chevalier d'Aguesseau has just gratified and shocked my heart at one and the same time; he knows that you were twenty-four hours at Chanteloup, that you are quite well, and that you reached Bordeaux on the 22d. After that, it was natural that your friends should hear from you on Saturday, 27th. I do not complain of the preference that you have given them ; but, mon ami, it would be sweet to be able to congratulate myself and to thank you' for an atten- tion I should have felt so much and of which my soul had need. Adieu ; here are three letters in a very short time. If I do not have one from you on Wednesday I believe that I shall be able to keep sUence. All my friends ask news of you with interest, especially M. d'Alembert. I think I have not told you of the success of the Chevalier de Chastellux in a trip of four days which he has just made to Villers-Cotterets [country-seat of the Due d'Orldans]. He gave six readings there, though he had but four plays with him ; he read two of them twice. He thinks that " Les Pretentions " was not much liked ; I scolded the Archbishop of Toulouse, who was present, for this. If you knew how he justified himself you would die of laughing. The chevalier related his successes to me with much naivete. I rejoiced ; 128 LETTERS OF [1774 but I am sorry to see him looking Ql ; I am afraid his health is seriously threatened. M. Watelet is quite ill with a chest affection ; he is taking asses' mUk. I am very poorly the last few days, but that is almost my habitual condition ; the duration of my trouble takes from me even the consola- tion of complaining of it. Adieu again. Did I not tell you that I had been to hear MOlico sing ? He is an Italian. Never, no never was the perfection of singing so united with sensibility and expres- sion. What tears he made me shed! what trouble he brought into my soul ! Ko singing ever left so deep, so sensi- tive, so heart-breaking an impression ; I could have listened to him till it killed me. Oh ! how preferable such a death to life ! Thursday, September 5, 1774. "Perhaps you will never read what I am going to write; perhaps, however, you will- receive it immediately. The letter that I expect Saturday wUl, I think, decide whether to bum what I now write, or send it to you. Listen to me : it seems to me that all the passions of my soul are calmed ; it has returned, it is restored to its first, its only object. Yes, mon ami, I do not deceive myself; my memories, my regrets even, are dearer, closer, more sacred to me than the violent sentiment I have had for you and the passionate desire I have had to see you share it. I have gathered myself together ; I have re-entered myself ; I have judged myself, and you also ; but I have pronounced judg- ment on myself only ; I have seen that I was seeking the impossible, namely : that you should love me. By an imspeakable good fortune, which seldom happens, the most tender, the most perfect, the most charming being who ever existed gave me, abandoned to me his soul, his thought, and all his existence. However unworthy I was 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 129 of his choice and of the gift he made me, I rejoiced in it, with amazement and transport. Wten I spoke to him of the vast distance which nature had placed between us, I grieved his heart ; and he soon persuaded me that all was equal between us because I loved him. No, never could beauty, charm, youth, virtue, merit be flattered and exalted to a higher degree than M. de Mora would fain have made my vanity enjoy; but he saw my soul; the passion that filled it cast me far indeed from the enjoyments of vanity. I tell you all this, mon ami, not from a weakness that would be too silly and too unworthy of the regrets which rend my heart, but to justify myself to you — yes, justify myself. I have loved you with transport ; but this cannot excuse iu your eyes the wish I dared to form of seeing you share my feeling ; that pretension must have seemed to you mad- ness ! I, to fix a man of your age, who joins to all agreeable qualities the talents and the wit which must make him an obj§ct of preference to all the women who have the most right to please, fascinate, and attach ! Mon ami, I am filled with confusion in thinking to what a point you must have thought my vanity blind and my reason astray. Yes, I blame myself sorrowfully: the liking you inspired in me, the remorse which tortured me, the passion felt for me by M. de Mora, all that combined has led me into an error I abhor, — for I must confess to you that my thoughts went farther still ; I was convinced that you might love me, and that conviction, so foolish, so self-conceited, dragged me into the abyss. No doubt it is late, too late, to tell myself" of my mistake. I detest it, and in despising myself I have tried to hate you ; in fact, you have excited in me that horrible emotion; I have even written to you to that effect; it was the last 9 130 LETTERS OF [1774 result, the last effect of the . passion which agitated me. I am far from making for myself a merit of the calmness to which I have returned ; it is, in fact, another blessing from the man I adored. I will not explain to you all that has passed within me during the last fifteen days ; sufficient to say that I know myself no longer : the thought of you no longer fills my mind, and if remorse were not beside my grief, I believe the thought of you would be very far away from me. Not that I could ever cease to feel a friendship for you, and an interest in your happiness ; but this will be a tempered feeling, which may, if you respond to it, give me ma,ny moments of- sweetness without ever troubling or tor- turing my soul. Oh ! with what horrors it has been filled ! It seems to me miraculous that I have not succumbed to the despair to which I have been brought. But this shock by depressing my body has given tone to my soul : it remains tender, but it feels no passion. No longer do I feel hatred, or vengeance, or — Ah, mon Dieu ! what word was I about to utter ? one that was no more allied to my thought than to the memory of M. de Mora. I still owe to him all that my heart can feel that is most consoling, most tender, regrets and tears. All the details that you have sent me have been bathed in my tears. I thank you for them ; I owe to you a sensation which I prefer to all pleasure that does not come from my thoughts of M. de Mora. I have read and re-read your letters, that from Bordeaux, and that of the 8th from Montauban. I pity you sincerely for being so agitated and tormented without any absolute reason for it ; but vague troubles are fugitive, at least I hope so, for I desire' your peace and happiness with all my soul. I cannot trouble either the one or the other, though your delicacy may make you suffer for the harm you have done me. I forgive it from the bottom of my heart ; forget it. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 131 never speak to me about it, and leave me to believe that you think me more unhappy than culpable. You are not obliged to believe me, and I have lost the right of convinc- ing you ; but I shall still venture to say with Jean-Jacques, '' My soul was never made for degradation." The strongest passion, the purest, inspired it too long; he who was the object of that passion was too virtuous; his soul was too great, too lofty to let him desire to reign in mine, if mine had been abject and contemptible. His prepossession, his passion for me raised me to his level. Mon Dieu! how I have fallen ! how sunken I am ! but he never knew it.' My misery is dreadful ; he would have shared it. He died for me. I should have made him live unhappy. Oh, my friend ! if in the region of the dead you still can hear me, be tender to my sorrow, my repentance. I have .been guilty, I have wronged you, but my despair, has it not expiated my crime ? I have lost you : I live, yes, I live ; is not that being pimished enough ? Forgive me the impulse that has led me to him whom I fain would follow. Adieu. If I receive a letter from you on Saturday I wHl add a few words ; but I forgive you in advance for whatever you may say that is offensive to me ; and I retract, with the strength and reason that remain to me, all that I have written iu the convulsions of despair. It is now that I place in your hands my true profession of faith; I promise and pledge myself to exact no more and expect no more from you. If you preserve- to me your friendship I shall enjoy it with peace and gratitude ; if you do not think me worthy of it I shall grieve, but I shall not consider you unjust. Adieu, mon ami ; it is friendship that now employs that word ; it is the dearer to my heart now that it can no longer trouble it. 132 LETTEES OF [1774 Saturday, eleven o'clock at night. Here is your answer : it is such as I could have wished, cold and restrained. Mon ami, we shall now understand each other ; my soul is in the key of yours ; my letter did not offend you; you have judged marvellously well; you have had over me the advantage of a reasonable man over an impassioned nature. You had cookiess, I had frenzy, but it was the last paroxysm of a dreadful malady, of which one had better die than recover, because the violence of these fits of fever blasts and lays low the strength of the unhappy patient — but enough, too much, no doubt, on what you call my " injustice " and your " delicacy." Mon ami, do you know what is delicate ? It would have been to suppress the six or seven pages you had written me before you received my letter. What superiority reason has over passion! how it rules conduct ! It brings and sheds peace on all ; in a word, it is so decorous, so circumspect, that I ought to thank you to-day for what you have said and what you have not said to me. Mon ami, your Friday letter is amiable ; it is gentle, obHgiug, reasonable ; it has the tone and charm of confidence ; but it is sad, and I am sorry if that is the disposition of your soul. I have not in me the wherewithal to rouse you ; I have not even the strength to talk with you to-night. Adieu ! you expect no further news of me, do you ? Monday evening, September 19, 1774. I wish to write to you. I want to answer you ; if I miss to-morrow's courier I must wait till Saturday; meanwhUe my soul is dead. I have just re-read your letter ; I thought it would revive me, but not so. ... I feel an awful sterility within me, and if I were to let myself go this is how I should answer you : " All the reflections that you make on 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 133 your present situation are very reasonable ; but if you con- cern yourself about the future you are even more sure to find subjects for hope than motives for fear. It seems to me that men of merit never had finer chances before them ; with virtue, ideas, and talent they can pretend to anything. This is not the moment for discouragement ; on the contrary, they should come forward now with confidence, not to seek favours, but to make themselves known and to get justice done to them." With regard to the late complete upsetting in the domains [the matter of " farms " and farmers-general], I find it diffi- cult to believe that M. Turgot will, in .any respect, follow or execute the projects of the Abb^ Terrai. If, however, the impossible happens, and he should choose to carry out that plan, M. de Vaines will be in the way of doing you service. He will do the impossible to oblige you ; he has a particular attraction towards you ; I never see him that he does not ask for news of you ; the day of yoiu? departure I received a note from him in which were these words : " I entreat you to send me news of yourself and of M. de Guibert, who greatly interests those who love a frank and ardent soul that springs on all sides towards glory." I wanted to send you these words, and then I was deterred by an interest that does not allow of words. You ought to write to M. de Vaines ; not on his good fortune, for it is just the reverse ; he has sacrificed his own interests to his friendship for M. Turgot and his love for the public good ; in a word, he was led away by his desire to assist in that good ; he has had the activity of virtue ; but now that a little calmness has returned he sees himself burdened with a sad labour. I do not contend against your projects for the future, — it does not ezist for me ; from that you wUl rightly believe that I cannot rouse myself to foresee or fear for others. In gen- 134 LETTERS OF [1774 eral, I think you would do best not to marry ic the provinces. That would be a way, of course, to settle your uncertainties, but it would also be a misfortune to deprive yourself of the greatest blessiag, which is hope. Mon ami, I cannot con- ceive why you have not strength enough to bear ill-fortune. Paris is the place in the world where one can be poor with the least privations ; none but fools and tiresome people need to be rich. — You see now that it was folly to thiok you must make the tour of the world in order to write a good work. Begin it now ; and before it is finished you may be rich enough to travel. In short, I want you to regard the lack of fortune as a contrariety, not a misfortune. Mon ami, if I looked down from the moon I should prefer your talent to the wealth of M. Beaujon ; I should better like the love of study than the post of grand-equerry of France. In other words, beiag condemned to live, and not being able to choose the life of a worthy Normandy farmer, I- should ask to have the mind and talent of M. de Guibert ; but I should wish to be inspired to make more use of them. What you tell me of the children of your sister is full of interest and feeling ; but, mon ami, here you are again tor- menting yourself about the future. They are well at present, those children ; you see what they have lost, and that worries you. The future of the little boy is less embarrassing ; you know better than I that the education of a provincial college is just as good and just as bad as that of a college in Paris ; and then, mon ami, if he enters a regiment at sixteen it is all the same whether he has been brought up in Bordeaux or in Paris. What false ideas we have on the first interest of life — happiness ! Ah ! good God ! is it in sharpening the mind, is it in widening ideas, that the happiness of individu- als is made ? — though both are useful in general. But why must your nephew be made happy in your way ? — I feel 1774) MLLE. DE LKSPINASSE. 135 that I am replying very stiffly, very 'stupidly, to the details into which your friendship and confidence made you enter ; but what can I do ? Nothing comes to me; my soul is a desert, my head as empty as a lantern. All that I say, all that I hear, is utterly indifferent to me ; I can say to-day, like the man who was blamed for not killing himself, since he was so detached from life, " I do not kill myself because it is all the same to me whether I live or die." That is not quite true with me, however, for I suffer, and death would be a relief ; but I have no energy.' September 20, 1774. 6 o'clock in the morning. To compensate for the flatness and dryness of my letter of last night, it occurs to me to send you two little folios of Vol- taire and the " Eulogy on La Fontaine," which I have read with as much pleasure as I should have had in listening to them. Notice that I do not praise to exaggeration, therefore you are free to have your own opinion and to think detestable what I thought good. An edict is to be issued within a few days on the domestic commerce in grains ; it will state its causes : that is a new system, and it seems to me it will certainly please the multitude; but knaves and partisans will still find something to criticise. It was said yesterday that the archbishopric of Cambrai would be given to Cardinal de Bernis and that the Due de La Eochefoucauld would go as ambassador to Eome. Perhaps the Abbd de V^ry may be first appointed, but only to get him made a cardinal and prepare the way for M. de La Rochefoucauld; that was the talk of yesterday at my fireside, and if I were to name to you the persons present you would see that if that news does not become true, it was at least not absurd. The Chevalier de Chas- tellux, whom I often see, but always on the run, has no 136 LETTERS OF [1774 time to ask me news of you ; he is busier, more dissipated, more in the suite of all the princes than ever. To-day he is in the country ; he will hear news of you there ; with tact and knowledge of the ways of the world a man is always in the tone and thought of those he is with. M. d'Alembert and all your friends speak to me often of you ; they address themselves to me to hear about you ; but it is I who must have recourse to them in future, must I not ? Ah ! mon Bieu ! how crazy passions are ! and how stupid I For the last fifteen days I feel the greatest horror at them. But I must also be just and admit that in adoring calmness and reason I scarcely exist ; I have strength to feel only my utter annihilation : my body, my soul, my head, all myself is ia a state of exhaustion ; and that state is not very painful, although it is new to me. Good-night, ition ami; for though it is morning I have not yet slept. No one, I think, has thought of writing about sleep, about its influence on the mind and on the passions. Those who study nature ought not to neglect that iateresting part of the life of the unhappy. Alas ! if they only knew how much the privation of sleep can add to other woes ! In approaching those who suffer, those who are imhappy, the first question asked should be, " Do you sleep ? " the second, " How old are you ? " Begun Thursday, September 22, 1774. Mon ami, if I still had passion, your silence would kiU me; and if I had only vanity it would woimd me and I should hate you with all my strength. Well ! I live, and I hate you no longer. But I shall not conceal that I see with grief, though without astonishment, that it was my impulsion that led you on — you were forced to answer me. You do not know what to say to me now, when you be- lieve that my feeling has ceased; you feel no regret, and you 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 137 find nothing in you which gives you the right to reclaim what you have lost. Well, mon ami, I am sufficiently calm to be just ; I approve of your conduct, though it grieves me ; I es- teem you for allowing nothing to take the place of truth. And, in fact, of what could you complain ? I have relieved you ; "it is dreadful to be the object of a feeling we do not share; we suffer, and we make the other suffer: to love and to be loved is the happiness of heaven ; when one has known it and lost it, what remains but to die ? There are two things in this life that do not admit of medi- ocrity — poesy and . . . But I do not deceive myself ; the feeling that I had for you was not perfect. First, it caused me to blame myself, — it cost me remorse ; and then — I know not if it was the trouble in my conscience that over- threw my soul and changed, absolutely, my manner of being and of loving — I was ceaselessly agitated by feelings I condemned; I felt jealousy, disquietude, dis- trust; I blamed you incessantly ; I imposed a law upon myself to . make no complaint ; but that coercion was dreadful to me; in short, that way of loving was so foreign to my soul that it became a torture. Mon ami, I loved you too much, and not enough. Thus we have both gained by the change that has been wrought in me, and which was neither your work nor mine. I saw clear for a moment, and in less than half an hour I felt the end of pain, I became extinct, and then I resuscitated. What is iaconceivable is that on coming to myself, I found only M. de Mora . . . the faintness that came upon my brain had obliterated the traces of all else. You, mon ami, who, fifteen minutes earlier filled all my thoughts, never once re-entered my mind for twenty-four hours ; and then I saw that my sentiment was only a memory. I remained thus several days without recovering the 138 LETTERS OF [1774 strength to suffer or to love, xmtil at last I regained the degree of reason which enables us to estimate all things at nearly their true value, and made me feel that, if 1 could hope for no pleasure, there was little misfortune left for me to fear. I have recovered calmness; but I do not deceive myself : it is the calm of death ; and before long, if I live, I can say, like that man who lived alone for thirty years and had never read anything but Plutarch, when they asked him how he felt, " Almost as happy as if I were dea'd. " Mon ami, that is my state of mind ; nothing that I see, that I hear, nothing that I do or have to do, can rouse my soul to an emo- tion of interest ; that maimer of existing has hitherto been un- known to me. There is but one thing in the world that does me good; it is music: but it is a good which others would call pain. I long to' hear a dozen times a day that air which rends me, and puts me in possession of all that I mourn : J'ai perdu mon Eurydice . . . I go constantly to the " Orpheus and Eurydice " [Gluck's opera], and I am there alone. Last Tuesday I told my friends that r intended to pay visits, but I shut myself up in a box. On returning home that evening I found a note from the Comte de Crillon telling me that he had had a letter from you the evening before. I waited till the next day and fortunately found him at Mme. Geoffrin's. He read me your letter; you spoke of me, and did so three times; that was kind, but very much colder than if you had not named me at all. However, mon ami, I am content; it is just what I wish of you. Mon JDieu /why should I be hard to satisfy — I, who can no longer love except with a reason- ableness and a moderation hitherto unknown to me? I have seen M. Turgot and spoken to him about what you fear as to the domains. He told me that no course had been decided on as yet; that M. de Beaumont, intendaht of 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSB. 139 finances, was engaged on the matter, and that meanwhile the companies created by the Abb6 Terrai were forbidden to act. M. Turgot added that as soon as he was informed by M. de Beaumont, he would teU me if anything was planned or decided in relation to the domains ; but he could now say, in general, that the greatest respect would be shown to property. I did not stop there : I spoke of your affair to M- de Vaines, and he answered me clearly : " Tell him to be easy ; the Abb^ Terrai's project will never be carried out by M. Turgot ; I answer for that." There, mon ami, are the answers of two men which ought to reassure you ; though they are not alike, they mean, it seems to me, the same thing. I send you the verdict of which I have already told you ; I add to it a letter from M. de Condorcet, which I think so good that I have had it copied. Mon ami, do not thank me for the pains I have taken to send you what pleases me : it is not done for your sake ; it is to hear you spoken of ; for I still retain much lik- ing for your mind, which is excellent and very natural. Adieu. Friday, September 23, 1774. Mon ami, I make you a victim ; I write to you so much that I oppress yoa It is the only occupation that makes me believe I still live ; and, though I think that to be quite dead is a better state, I find, while suffering, a certain sweetness in turning toward you. If you do not understand me you will hear me at any rate, and answer me, for it is very sad to have no letters from you. Here are two couriers missed, Monday and Wednesday, and it is I who have done myself that harm ; for, without loving me, you would certainly have continued to write to me punctually. Ah ! good God ! to what excess I have been carried ! I loved you and hated you with fury. It was only the last transport of a soul about to vanish forever — and in truth I have not felt it since ; I do 140 LETTERS OF [1774 not know what has become of it. I thought you would have written on Wednesday to M. d'Alembert ; my first words on coming home that evening were to ask him if he had had a letter ; he said he did not know — for he has the excellent habit of not opening his letters till the next momiag. I soon knew that he had received none from you, and my suffering increased so much that I was obliged to take an anodyne, and then, by dint of reason and arguments, I came, not to care no longer, but, at least, to cease to torture myself. You know that M. de Muy, miaister of war, is to marry ia a few days Mme. de Saint-Blancard, a German chanoinesse, whom you may have known during the late war. They say she is amiable, has been pretty, and loves M. de Muy. This, marriage gives me a very good opinion of him; it is an excellent employment of his wealth. The Comte de Broghe is at Euffec ; is that very far from Montauban ? I should be sorry to have you go there ; he would agitate your mind and give you no help in bringing to good conclusion the projects of fortune he would put into your head. Mon ami, you should fix your thoughts, you ought to see much of M. de Muy. He must know you, and if he has intelligence he will seek- the aid of your ideas and your talents. Above aU, bring back with you your father ; his presence will be useful to you, and besides, if his fortune is capable of amelioration he ought to show himself ; no one seeks the merit that conceals itself. I strongly applaud the horror you feel at proviucial life ; but the country is not provincial ; I would rather live in a village among the peasantry than in a town like Montauban and the good company of that society. But, mon Dieu ! in Paris how many provincial towns there are ! how many fools ! how many sham " importants." Good is so rare everywhere • that I am not sure if it is not a great misfortune to have known it, and to have made it one's " daily bread." 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 141 We may say of the habit of living with persons of intellect and high merit what M. de La Kochef oucauld said of the Court : " It does not make us happy, but it prevents us from finding happiness elsewhere ; " that is precisely what I feel now every time I find myself in society. My friend, guess if you can — but I must tell you it is no happiness, no pleasure, not even a consolation to be loved, even deeply loved by any one who has very little mind. Ah ! how I hate myself for not being able to love that which is excellent ! how difficult to please I have grown ! But is it my fault ? see what an education I have received. Mme. du Deffand (because for intellect she must be cited) President H^nault, the Abb^ Bon, the Archbishop of Toulouse, the Arch- bishop of Aix, M. Turgot, M. d'Alembert, the Abb^ de Bois- mont, M. de Mora, — those were the persons who taught me to think and speak, and who deigned to consider me as some- thing : after that, how could I turn my thoughts to being loved by ... ? But, mon ami, do you* think people can love when they have little or no mind ? I know very well that you think me crazy or imbecile ; but what does that matter ? I had it on my heart to say to you what I have just said. Good-night : I keep a little place in my letter to tell you to-morrow that' I have no news from you. Mon ami, forgive me, but that seems impossible. Saturday, after post time. You are ill, you have fever ! Ah ! mon ami, it is not my interest that this news awaliens ; it is my terror — I think that I bring evil to all I love. Oh ! mon Dieu ! if I must fear again, if I must again feel the terrors and the despair that, consumed two years of my life, why did you then pre- vent me from dying ? You did not love me, but you chained me ! . If on Monday I do not hear from you . . . 142 LETTERS OF [1774 Monday, September 26, 1774. Mon ami, I desired all day yesterday to write to you, but strength failed me. I was in a state of suffering which has taken from me the power to speak and act. I cannot eat; the words food and pain are synonymous to me now. — But it is of you I wish to speak, it is with you that my mind is occupied, for you that I am anxious. I see you ill ; I reproach myself for having caused you some moments of sadness; "without flattering myself that you attach much interest either to my feelings or to me, I know that I have troubled your peace of mind, and I am greatly distressed. Mon ami, it is you who taught me to grieve and torture that which I love. Ah! I have been cruelly punished for it! and if heaven reserves for me . . . Ah ! my blood freezes, I will sooner die. That thought is more dreadful than the most violent death could ever be. You say you wish never to wake, and it is to me that you confide your disgust of life. How different were the words that he wrote me when dying : " I was about to see you again, and I must die ! what a'dread- ful fate ! but you have loved me, and you fill me still with tender feeling. I die for you ..." Mon ami, I cannot transcribe those words without bursting into tears ; the feeling that dictated thiem was the tenderest and most impassioned that ever was; misfortune, absence, illness, nothing could shake or chQl that soul of fire. Ah 1 I thought to die yesterday on reading a letter from M. de Fuentfes [M. de Mora's father]. He tells me that his sorrow has not allowed him as yet to look at anything that was dear to his son; that he will always preserve for me the warmest and tenderest gratitude for the proofs of affection which I have at all times given to M. de Mora ; that I have supported him under his affliction, and that he would gladly return at the cost of his life all that his son owed to me. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 143 He adds that he ventures in his name, the name of the son he mourns, to ask me for a favour, namely: to induce M. d'Alembert, who was once his friend, to write a funereal eulogy in honour of his son's memory, which would be the consolation of his few remaining years, and which he could read to his family as an honourable record and a source of encouragement in virtue to his other children. And this touching entreaty ends in tears. Ah! how many it made me shed. I do not fear to weary you with a narrative which would not be cold in a novel. Mon Dieu ! I adore M. de Fuentfes ; he was worthy of having such a son. What a loss for him and for all who loved that son ! and yet we live ! His father, his sister, and I, we would have been too fortu- nate had we died at the moment he was taken from us. Ah ! my friend, have pity for me ! You alone in the world can bring some sentiments of comfort and consolation to a soul that is mortally wounded. I feel that your presence would have lightened the load with which I am crushed ; now that I see. you no longer I am lost in the wilderness ; my soul is driven to excesses, as you saw by the violence I put into my conduct to you. Mon ami, replace me in the right way. Be my guide, if you wish me to live. Do not abandon me. I dare not say to you, I love you ; I know not if I do. Judge me in the trouble in which I live. You know me better than I know myself. I know ■ not whether it is you or death that I implore : I have need of being succoured, of being delivered from the misery that is killing me. — Mon ami, if I do not have news from you to-day, or at least hear some, I know not how I can wait till Wednes- day. Mon Dieu! can you conceive, can you attain to an idea of what I feel, of aU I suffer ? Could any one believe that I ever knew calmness ? Mon ami, it is true that I lived for twenty-four hours apart from all thought of you; after 144 LETTERS OF [1774 whicli I was many days in total apathy ; I lived, but it seemed to me I was beside my own self. I remembered having had a soul that loved you ; I saw it afar, but it inspired me no longer. Alas ! if you are as indifferent as that " unfortu- nate being who loves nothing," you will not understand me ; ■ if this language does not go to your soul that soul is deadly cold ; it will then be for me to pity you for the weariness I have caused you. Good-bye ; I will not close my letter until after the post- man comes. Moil ami, do not take too much quinine; it injures the chest, and when one is cured too quickly of a fever, obstructions nearly always appear elsewhere ; remem- ber that you are not free to neglect your health ; my peace, my life depend upon it. Moh ami, tell me if I love you ; you ought to know — I, I know myself no longer ; for exam- ple, at this moment I feel that I passionately long for news of you, but I feel also, in a most urgent manner that I tieed to die. I suffer from head to foot. My soul is uplifted and my body faints; from this lack of harmony misery results, and well-nigh madness — But I must stop. Adieu ; would that I could go to meet the postman. 4 o'dock. . The postnian has arrived. M. d'Alembert has no letter, although the courier from Montauban comes on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Saturdays. Mon ami, I am very unhappy ; either you are very ill, or you are very cruel to leave me in such anxiety. You know if my health, my con- dition, can bear this increase of trouble and pain. Ah 1 mon Bieu ! what shall I do, what will become of me till Wednes- day ! I will send to the Chevalier d'AguesseaiL Friday, in the evening, September 30, 1774. Mon ami, you kept me from dying, yet you kill me by leaving me in a state of anxiety which convulses my soul. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 145 I have no news of you ; nor has the Chevalier d'Aguesseau ; and he has been to all the persons who might, perhaps, have had some. Ah ! mon Dieu ! how little I knew myself ! how mistaken I was when I told you that my soul was forever closed to happiness, to pleasure; that it could now know nothing but dull misery, and that I had no longer anything to fear. Alas ! I cannot breathe since Wednesday. I see you ill; I have an iuward terror that alarms me. What a dread- ful state of things you are makiag me endure ! — these Wednesdays, these Saturdays, horrible days which have made the hope and the despair of my life for two consec- utive years ! But can you be ill enough to have forgotten that you are loved with passion ; and if you have remembered it why have you failed to write to me ? Surely you knew it was delivering my soul to mortal agony to thus make me fear for you. Mon ami, if you could have spared me what I suffer, you are very guilty ; and it seems to me that such a wrong ought now to cure me. But oh ! my God ! are we free ? Can I calm and chill myself according to my will, and ac- cording perhaps to yours ? Ah ! I can only love you and suffer ; that is the emotion, the sentiment of my heart ; I can neither stop it nor excite it, but I long to die. I have thoughts which are an active poison ; but it is not rapid enough. If I hear to-morrow that you are HI, but receive no letter, I shall have lived too long. No, it is impossible, you have surely thought of me ; I wait therefore, but in trem- bling and with an impatience never felt except by a soul as impassioned as it is unhappy. Ah ! Diderot was right : none but the unhappy know how to love. But, mon ami, this will not soothe you if you suffer ; and if you are calm you will not value it. Well ! I love you, and I do not need your feel- ing for. my heart to give itself, to abandon itself to you. 10 146 LETTERS OF [1774 All that the Abb^ Terrai did, or planned to do in the mat- ter of the domains is null and void ; all has been destroyed, rescinded, nullified ; you may be as easy about your father's property as you were ten years ago. M. Turgot assured me of this yesterday ; he asked me for news of you, and re- proached himself for not having yet had a moment in which to answer persons to whom he could not bring himself to write office letters. M. de Vaines charged me to recall him to your recollection ; he is absolutely crushed by his work ; they have so much to repair and to foresee that they have not a moment in which to breathe. The Abb^ Terrai is or- dered to replace in the royal treasury the hundred thousand crowns he had taken by anticipation on the leasing of farms ; M. Turgot has declared that he does not wish for the fifty thousafi-d francs which come to him yearly, by law, from those leases ; he has reduced himself in the same way on all sides, which gives him courage to make reforms of the same kind in the offices dependent on him. He is an excellent man ; and if he can remain in office he will become the idol of the nation : he is fanatical for the public good, and he spends all his strength for it. Saturday, after the postman. I was interrupted. I have received your letter, mon ami; you are well ; that is enough to live for. Alas ! I know not how to answer you. The shocks that you give my soul are too violent for words. Mon ami, all that I can say to you is that your letter is charming through the tone of tenderness and confidence which reigns there ; it is honourable and true as your own soul ; and though it does not answer mine on all points, that is not your fault, and I do not complain of it. Alas, no ! I am satisfied with you ; but I say with Phfedre, " I have taken to life a hatred, and to my love a horror." 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 147 Oh ! if you ka^w how I detest myself, and what reason I have to do so ! Truth is in my heart, and I must ever re- proach myself for usurping the esteem and the sentiments that are given to me. During this late time I fell into a state that alarmed my friends ; thfey ascribed it to my sense of the loss that I have met with, and thus they honoured it ; whereas, the alarm you caused me diverted my mind from those regrets that had hitherto rent my souL So, though dying, of grief, I am unworthy of the sentiments I inspire. Do you conceive the full horror of my situation ? Do, you believe that it is in human nature to bear it long ? Where shall I find courage against such sorrow ? Who will share it with me ? Who can have compassion upon so much misery ? Well ! I say to my heart — and I feel it, I do not deceive myself — if M. de Mora could live again he would understand me, he would love me, and I should have no more remorse, no more suffering. Ah ! that feeling ought to show you what I have lost L Mon ami, why have you not written to me by the last two couriers ? Why do you not answer me and say, " I reply to your letter of such a date " ? We ought to come to some agreement ; a troubled head needs to be spared. Mon ami, consider me as one attacked by mortal illness ; and give me the cares, the indulgence, we have for the dying ; that will have no harmful consequences to your happiness. I bind myself by all that I hold most sacred, by the memory of M. de Mora, never to trouble you, to exact nothing from you; and after this letter of yours, which is such that my heart thanks you for it, you could never deceive me, I could never complain; and if I did show grief, you would be feeling enough to hear me without im- patience. Adieu, I do not answer yoyr letter ; in the confusion of my thoughts, in the trouble T am in, I feel but one thing : I 148 LETTERS OF [1774 live and I have lost him who loved me. Mon ami, if it does not constrain you too much, write to me by every courier ; I need it. Monday, October 3, 1774. Ah ! mon ami, my soul is sick. I have no words, I have only cries. I have read, I have re-read, I shall read a hundred times your letter. Ah ! my friend, what blessings and what evUs united ! what pleasure mingled with the cruellest bitter- ness ! The reading of that letter iucreases and redoubles the agitations of my heart ; I can no longer calm myself. You have charmed and rent my soul alternately ; never did I find you more lovable, more worthy of being loved, and never have I been so penetrated with deep and poignant and bitter sorrow at the memory of M. de Mora. Yes, I fainted imder it, my heart was oppressed, I wandered iu my thoughts all night ; so violent a state must surely annihilate me, or drive me mad. Alas ! I fear neither : if I loved you less, if my regrets were less dear to me, with what delirious joy, with what transport would I deliver myself from the life that is crushing me ! Ah ! never, never did any creature survive such torture, such despair. Mon ami, why do we make poison of the only good that is in Nature, the only good that men have not been able to spoil, nor yet corrupt ? The whole world is estimated and paid by money ; consideration, happiness, friendship, even virtue, are bought, paid, and rated at their weight in gold ; there is but one thing high above opinion, one thing remaining spotless like the sun, which has its heat, which vivifies the soul, enlightens it, sustains it, makes it stronger, greater. Ah ! mon ami, need I name that gift of Nature ? But when it does not make the happiness of the soul it fills, we must die — oh, yes ! die ! I needed that, I yielded to it ; but you were cruel ! Ah ! what have you done with the life you saved ? 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 149 Filled it with trouble and tears ! added to a frightful misfor- tune the torture of remorse ! made me detest every instant of my life ! and yet you have bound me to it by an interest that consumes my heart and which, twenty times a day, pre- sents itself to my thoughts as a crime ! Ah ! mon Dieu ! I am guHty, yet heaven is witness that nothing was dearer to my heart than virtue — and to say that it was not you who led me astray ! What ? you believe that it was I alone who cast myself into that abyss ? I am not to impute to you either my faults or my misfortunes ? Oh ! I wanted to expi- ate them, I saw the termination of my woe ; in hating you I became stronger than death. By what fatality, and why have I returned to you ? Why did the fear of your Ulness thus ener- vate my soul ? Why do you rend me and comfort me at the same moment ? Why this fatal mixture of pleasure and pain, of balm and poison ? All this acts with too much violence on a soul that passion and misfortune have overwrought ; all this is completing the ^ destruction of a body exhausted by illness and loss of sleep. Alas ! I said to you, iu the extremity of my trouble, " I know not if it be you or death that I implore ; ' it is by you, or by death that I must be relieved, or cured forever — aU the world, all Nature can do nothing for me. Alas ! does there remain to me one prayer, one desire, one regret, one thought of which you and M. de Mora are not the object ? Mon ami, I thought my soul extinct ; I told you this and I found sweetness in such repose. But ah, good God! how fugitive that feeling was ! it was only the effect of opium prolonged. Well ! I will recover my reason or I shall lose it wholly. But tell me, how is it possible that I have not yet spoken to you of yourself, that I have not said how I fear a return of your fever; and that I hope for news to-day as the post is not in ? Adieu, mon ami ; your 150 LETTERS OF [1774 gentleness, your truth have filled my heart with tenderness and sensibility. Monday evening. - I have a line from you and only a line ; but it tells me that you are without fever, and thus it has tranquillized me. But you are anxioue about your sister ; and so am I, for I am so near to all that touches you. I, too, have fever : the paroxysm of suffering last night has affected my blood and my pulse ; but do not be uneasy, death never comes so opportunely ; the unhappy do not die, and they are too feeble, too cowardly, when they love, to kill themselves. I shall live, I shall suffer, I shall await — not happiness, not pleasure — what ? ' Mon ami, i-t is to you I speak ; answer me. . . . Do you not think that your heedlessness is rather danger- ous ? You write to me and do not seal your letter ; I send you its envelope that you may not doubt me. The Pope ^ is dead of an illness that arouses very frightful suspicions. Good-night, mon ami. My head is heavy and I feel more ill than usual, but I have had my letter from you : that is the one important thing. I am in a very singular condition; for the last twelve hours my eyes represent to me but one and always the same object, whether I keep them open or shut; that object, which is he whose memory I cherish and adore, fills me with dread. At this very moment he is there ; what I touch, what I write is not more present, more visible ; but why should I fear ? why this trouble ? Ah ! if it only were so! . . . Wednesday, October 5, 1774. Mo% ami, I have no letter from you ; I expected, one. Alas ! I experience that the soul which hopes least can be 1 Clement XIV., Lorenzo Ganganelli ; author of the Bull which sup- pressed the Order of the Jesuits. He was thought to hare been poisoned. — Fr. Ed. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 151 disappointed. Forgive me: the need that I have of you makes me expect too much; I must be corrected of that error. I am ill, and in a state of inexpressible suffer- ing; all kinds of nourishment do me equal harm. My physician concludes that some obstruction is forming in the pylorus ; that strange word was unknown to me ; but it is torture when that door shuts. I am taking hemlock ; if it could be prepared like that of Socrates I should take it with pleasure. It would cure me of the slow and pain- ful malady called life. You do me harm, mon ami ; you render death a necessity to me, and you hold me to life. What weakness ! what in- consistency ! Yes, I judge myself rightly ; but I languish, I delay. I feel that there will come a day, a moment when I shall bitterly repent having delayed so long. If I cast my eyes upon the past I see that I should have been too fortu- nate if the end of my life had come on Wednesday, June 1 [therday she heard of M. de Mora's death]. Mon Dieu ! what sorrow, what evils I should then have escaped. Yes, I shud- der in thinking that I can blame no one but you for all that I have suffered since that fatal day. How ill-inspired you were ! my death would have been no injury to you. At this moment when I write to you, you would not remember it ; whereas, in place of that f orgetfulness which would have left you to enjoy your repose and pleasure, I burden you with my woes, I make the whole weight of my life weigh upon your heart. Ah ! I know well that susceptible, strong, and virtu- ous heart; it would be capable of making some great sac- rifice to relieve the unhappy soul, but it is out of your power to take care of it, soothe it, calm it. Whatever is consecutive is to you impossible ; your heart is impassioned, but it does not know tenderness. Passion only works spasmodically ; it has actions, emotions; but tenderness gives care, it helps, 152 LETTERS OF [1774 it comforts, it would have written by every courier, because it would have felt the needs of a suffering soul. No, these are not .reproaches, they wovild be useless or distressing. Ah ! how grieved I should be to give you an instant's pain. Mon ami, I need to know if your fever has not returned, and if that of your sister is subdued. In writing to you the last time I was delirious, I think; I had a burning fever all night; it has left me now, and in leaving me it has effaced that image that hid all other objects from my sight; but I do not know why it brought such terror into my soul. Ah ! if I could buy back his life for a single hour there is no pain I should not have the strength to bear ; I should say with Zulime : — " Death and hell appear before me : Ramire ! with transport I descend there for thee." But, mon ami, I did not mean to say to you all this. I am confused; I cannot continue. Adieu. Saturday, midnight. First of all, I must tell you that your ink is white as paper, and to-day it has really put me out of patience. I had or- dered your letter to be brought to me at M. Turgot's, where I was dining with twenty persons. It was given to me while at table; on one side I had the Archbishop of Aix, on the other, that inquisitive Abb^ Morellet. I opened my letter under the table ; I could scarcely see that any black was on the white, and the abb6 made the same remark. Mme. de BoufiElers, who was on the other side of the Archbishop of Aix, asked what I was reading. " Eemem- ber where we are, and you will know what it is.'' — "A memorial, no doubt, for M. Turgot ? " — " Yes, just so, ma- dame, and I wish to read it over before I give it to him." 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 153 Before returning to the salon I had read the letter through, and I am now going to reply to it — though I must do it hastily, for I am very tired with the great exertions that I made to-day. I have seen at least a hundred per- sons, and as your letter had done good to my soul, I talked, I forgot I was dead, and I have really extinguished myself. The truth is I had a " great success " because I brought out the charms and the intellects of the persons with whom I was ; and it is to you, mon ami, that they owe that pastime, so sweet to their self-love. As for mine, it is not intoxicated by your praises ; I reply to you, like Couci : " Love me, my prince, and praise me not.'' Mon ami, keep yourself from ever again having the kind- ness to set forth my blessings and display my gifts ; never did I feel myself so poor, so ruined, so poverty-stricken ; in estimating what I have, in making me see my resources, you only show me that all is lost. One means alone remains to me, — I have long foreboded it, I even think it a necessity, — namely, to make total bankruptcy ; but I postpone, I delay, I rock myself with hopes, with chimeras ; I know them to be such, and yet they sustain me a little — but you destroy all by the horrible enumeration that you make of them. Ah ! what a deplorable inventory ! if any other than you had attempted to console me, to reconcile me to life by these hopeless, consolations, I should say to him, like Agnes, " Horace, with two words, could do more than you " — but it is Horace who speaks to me ! Oh ! mon ami, my soul is sinking. Wliat more will you invent to torture me ? I shall be, you say, sustained, guaranteed, defended, etc. Well ! never have I been all that; if you set your friendship at that value, I ask none of it. I have been weak, incon- sistent, unhappy, very unhappy; I have feared for you; I have wandered in the wilderness ; I have done wrong, no 154 LETTERS OF [1774 doubt ; and it is one harm the more to dwell upon it. I have not an impulse, I never say a word to you, that does not cause me regret or repentance. Mon ami, I ought to hate you. Alas ! it is long since I have done what I ought, what I wish ! I hate myself, I condemn myself, and I love you. Sunday evening, October 9, 1774. Mon ami, I have read your letter twice ; and the total impression that I receive from it is that you are very amiable, and that it is much easier not to love you at aU than to love you moderately. Make the commentary on that, but not with your mind ; it is not to your mind that I speak. Mon ami, if I chose, I could dweU on certain words in your letter which have done me harm. You speak of my courage, my resources, the employment of my time, and of that of my soul in a manner to make me die of shame and regret for having suffered you to see my weakness. Ah, well ! it was in my soul, of which no impulse can be hidden from you. When it was moved by hatred, I let you see it ; but was hatred all that I allowed myself to feel ? Mon ami, on reading again the recapitulation that you make of all there is on earth to keep me from destruction, I ended by laughing over it because it reminded me of a sayiag of President H^nault, which is good. At a certain period of his life he thought that, in order to add to the esteem in which he was held, it would be well to become devout; he made a general confession, and afterwards wrote to his friend M. d'Argenson, " Never do we feel so rich as when we move our belongings [que lorsqu'on d6menage\." I shall dine to-morrow with the Duchesse d'Anville.- I likfe that house; it is one the more where I can see you; you live for what you love and for the gay world every evening; but wUl you not often, dine where I do? That 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 155 win bring you into the society of th'ose persons wlio are the most on your own tone. Fools and stupid people are never afoot before five or six o'clock ; that is the time when I return to my chimney corner, where I nearly always find, if not what I should have chosen, at any rate nothing that I wish to avoid. How is it that I have never yet told you that I am urged, entreated, to go and re-establish my health in England at the house of Lord Shelburne [Marquis of Lansdowne] ? He is a man of intellect, the leader of the Opposition; he waS the friend of Sterne, and adores his Works. See what an attrac- tion he must have for me, and whether I am not much tempted by his obliging invitation. Admit that if you had known of this piece of good fortime you would not have omitted it from my pompous inventory. Yes, M. de Condorcet is with his mother; he works ten hours a day. He has a score of correspondents, intimate friends ; and each, without fatuity, may think himself his - first object ; never, never did any man have more existence, greater means, so much felicity. I just remember that you have never said a word to me about the Due de Choiseul ; is it because yoiu- stay at Chanteloup has left no traces on your journey ? WeU ! here is how he stands in Paris : the public takes no notice of him ; it seems to me that the best thing for him at present is to remain in that state of oblivion, for he will gain nothing now by comparisons. We might have owed M. Turgot to him ten years ago, but he preferred to choose such ministers as Laverdy, Maupeou, Terrai, and others. Your letter to M. d'Alemibert is excellent ; and as we are very communicative we gave it this evening to M. de Vaines, who was charmed with it, and desires to show it to him who could enjoy it without its alarming his modesty. You will 156 LETTERS OF [1774 never guess wTiat occupies my mind, what I desire to do : to marry one of my friends. I want an idea that has come to me to succeed ; the Archbishop of Toulouse could be very helpful to the success of the affair. The young lady is six- teen years old and has only a mother, no father, and a brother. They will give her, on marryiag, thirteen thousand francs a year ; her mother will lodge her, and do so for a long - time, because the son is a chUd. This girl cannot have less eventually than six hundred thousand francs, and she may be much richer : will that suit you, mon ami ? Say so, and we will act; it can be done without offence, because the Archbishop of Toulouse has as much skill as courtesy. Let us talk it over ; and if this plan does not succeed I know a man who would be very glad to have you for a son-in-law ; but his daughter is only eleven years old; she is an only child and will be very rich. Mon ami, what I desire above all things is your happiness ; and the means of procuring it for you will become the chief interest of my life. There was a time when my soul would have been less generous ; but then it responded to one who would have rejected with horror the empire of the world. What a memory ! how sweet, how cruel ! Good-night ; if I receive, as I hope, a letter from you to-morrow I will add to this volume. For the last two days I have suffered less. I have reached the stage of two chicken-wings a day, and if that regimen does not suc- ceed better than the others, I shall put myself on a milk diet. Still Sunday, October 9. That adieu was very sudden, yery abrupt, and you will readily understand that I have &, thousand other things to say to you ; for, if I am not mistaken, this is the last letter I shall write to you. As to this, I shall know to-morrow. You ■tell me that you are going to your regiment ; you have twice ■774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSE. 157 written to me the name of the place where it is stationed, but, thanks to the beauty of your writing, I do not know what it is. I seem to make out lAvourne, but that, surely, cannot be where you are going [it was Liboume, a new garrison of the Corsican Legion] . Mon ami, write me from wherever you stop ; you must compensate me for the priva- tion of not writing to you. I do not feel certain that you have started as yet. How could you refuse your mother, — above all, if she is -not convalescent ? she must be ill if she still has fever. How I hope you are not mistaken and that I shall really see you in two weeks. Fifteen days ! that is a long way off ; once I looked for a nearer coming — Ah ! I shudder ! what a dreadful recollection ! it poisons hope. Ah ! mon Dieu ! it was you who troubled and overthrew the hap- piness of that tender and impassioned soul ; it was you who condemned us to an awful misfortune, and — it is you I love ! Yes, we hate the evil that we do, but we are drawn to it. Without your consolation I should have died of grief, and now I am fated to live, to languish, to moan, to fear you, to love you, to curse life and to cherish it at some moments. . . . Here I was interrupted ; persons came and proposed to me to go and see Duplessis. He is a portrait-painter who wlU stand beside Van Dyck. I do not know if you have seen the portrait of the Abbd Armaud painted by him ; but, my friend, you must certainly see that of Gluck ; it has a degree of truth and perfection which is better and greater than nature. He has put ten heads into it, all of different char- acters; I have never seen anything finer or truer in that respect. M. d'Argental came there, and showed us a letter he had just received fromi M. de Voltaire ; I thought it so good, the tone so natural, it brought him so near to us, that, without thinking whether it were discreet or not, I asked for the letter ; I asked for a copy ; they are now making it, and 158 LETTERS OF [i;74 mon ami shall read it — tliat thought is at the bottom of everything. Mon ami, I must repeat myself and say, as Sterne to his Eliza, " Your pleasure is the first need of my heart." Mon Dieu ! how difficult it is to begin a letter when one has to make sentiment with one's mind. But I must write to Mme. de Boufflers. She has not once mentioned your name to me ; I am not sorry ; but how is it that persons do not seize every occasion to talk of that which pleases them ? There is, of course, a certain degree of affection that hinders ; it is that which prevents me from speaking to her of you, but she has never felt any such embarrassment, I am sure ; she has nothing to do with loving, — she is too charming ! Mon ami, I know myself so well that I am tempted to think you are laughing at me when you speak of my suc- cesses in society. It is eight years since I retired from the world; from the moment that I loved I felt a disgust for such successes. What need have we of pleasing when we are beloved ? Is there one emotion, one desire left that has not for its object the person whom we love and for whom we desire to live exclusively ? Mon ami, you have no such desire, have you ? Friday, October 14, 1774. Man ami, I have just returned from hearing the " Orpheus ; " it has soothed, it has calmed my soul. I wept, but my tears had no bitterness ; my sorrow was gentle, my regrets were mingled with memories of you, and my thoughts rested on them without remorse. I wept for what I had lost, and I loved you ; my heart was able for .both. Oh ! what a charming art ! what a divine art ! Music was invented by a sensitive being who desired to console the unhappy. What beneficent balm in those enchanting sounds ! Mon ami, for incurable sorrows we should take anodynes 1774] MLLE. BE LESPmASSE. 159 only; and there are but three in all the world to soothe my heart : you first, mon ami, you, the most eflficacious of all, you who lift me from my sorrow, who fill my soul with a sort of intoxication that takes from me the faculty of remembering and foreseeing. After this first of all bless- ing, which I treasure as the support and the resource of my despair, comes opium ; it is not dear to me in itself, but it is necessary. And lastly, that which is agreeable to me, which charms away my griefs, is music. Music pours into my blood, into all that animates me, a sweetness, a sensibility so delightful that I may almost say it tmns to joy my regrets and my misfortunes ; and that is so true that in the happiest period of my life music was not to me then of the value it is now. Mon ami, before you went away I did not go to " Orpheus ; " I did not feel the need of it ; I saw, or I had seen you, or I expected you ; that filled all ; but since your absence, in the void about me, in the many and various crises of despair which have shaken and convulsed my soul, I have called all resources to my aid. How feeble they are ! how impotent against the poison that eats away my life ! But I must turn from myself and speak of you; I ought not to have changed that topic. M. Turgot has written to you ; he has made amends, for he asks you to do him a service, and I feel very sure that you have thus felt it. M. de Vaines said to me yesterday : " Make M. de Guibert return ; he could enlighten us ; he would be useful to us about things of which we are ignorant and need information." — The Comte de C . . . was at the Opera to-night ; he came to see me iu my box and talked much of his affairs.- A great fortune is a great burden ; he has many lawsuits, and is iucessantly occupied with a mass of objects from which he derives neither profit nor fame. Ab ! no, hap- piness is not in great riches. Where is it, then ? among a 160 LETTERS OF [1774 few erudites, very dull and very solitary ; among good arti- sans, busy in a lucrative and not painful labour ; among good farmers with large and active families, who live in decent comfort. All the rest of the world swarms with fools, imbe- ciles, and madmen ; in the latter class are the unhappy — among whom I do not include those in Charenton ; for the style of madness which makes a man suppose himself the Eternal Father may be better, perhaps, than wisdom or happiness. I send an extract of a letter written to the Swedish am- bassador; you will observe with what elegance foreigners speak French! I have not changed a comma. Everybody is at Fontainebleau, and I am glad of it ; I should often like to write over my door, as some learned man did over his, " Those who come to see me do me honour, those who do not come give me pleasure." M. de Marmontel proposed to me to come last Wednesday and read me his new comic opera. He came ; there were some twelve persons present. Behold us in a circle Surrounding him, and listening to the " Vieux Gar§on,^' — that was the name of the piece. The begin- ning of the first scene seemed to me muddled, confused. What do you think I then did, without my will having the slightest part in it ? I did not listen to a word ; and that is so true that if I were hanged for it, I could not have told the name of a personage or the subject of the play; I got out of it by telling the truth, namely, that the time seemed to me very short. The fact is that, since I have been unable to fix my attention upon anything, I love readings dis- tractedly, because they leave me ■ free ; whereas in conversa- tion we have to recall our thoughts. Mon ami, you may say what you please, but I do not like conversation unless it is you or the Chevalier de Chastellux who make it. Apropos, he is much pleased with me ; I have stirred up his friends. 1774] MLLE. DE LESPINASSB. 161 and thiogs are so weU arranged that aU we need to get him received into the Academy is the death of one of the forty. It is a proper thing, no doubt, but it was not done withoui difficulty; the interest, the pleasure, the desire he put into this triumph spurned me on. Mon Dieu ! Fontenelle was right : there are rattles for aU ages ; there is nought but sor- row too old for them, nought but passion too reasonable. Mon ami, those are not paradoxes; think them over, and you will see they can be .maioifcained. Good-night; it is time to let you breathe; I have written without pausing. Opera days are my times of retreat. I am alone when I come home; my door is closed. M. d'Alembert has been to see "Harlequin;" he likes that better than "Orpheus." Every one has good reasons, and I am far from criticising tastes; aU are good. Adieu, till to-morrow. Saturday, three o'clock, after the postman. I dined at home to get my letter from you an hour earlier ; that replies to your last question. But, mon ami, you truly gpeve me by not saying a word as to why you did not write to me by the last courier. You feel you did wrong, and. you want to turn my mind away from it by promising to do better in future; you are very amiable, mon ami, and I thank you in advance. I dare not desire your return, but I count the days of your absence. Mon Dieu ! how slow they are ! how long they are ! how they weigh upon my soul I how difficult, how impossible it is to distract one's self a moment from the soul's need ! Books, society, friendship, all imagi- nable resources serve only to make us feel more keenly the value and power of what we lack. I do not answer, but I am touched to the depths of my heart by what you say to me of M. de Mora. M. d'Alem- bert has written to M. de Fuentfes.; he wrote from his own 162 LETTERS OF [l774 impulse; and ia reading me his letter he wept, and made me, too, burst into tears. Ah ! how that thought rends me ! Mo% ami, I want to think now of you, and to justify the feeliQg that made me bum your letters. I did not think I should survive that sacrifice a day, and as I made it my blood, my heart were frozen with despair, so that I did not fully feel the loss I had inflicted on myself for over six days. Ah ! twenty times, a hundred times I have grieved to have burned what you had written : nothing can repair that loss ; it is heart-breaking. Yes, M. Turgot is at work about the corvSes. Good-bye, mon ami ; are you not weary of reading these scribblings ? Sunday evening, October 16, 1774. . M