^^ CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ML.-' Cornell University Library BF1411 .S86 Canon : an exposition of the paaan myste olin 3 1924 028 956 262 PATE DUE s*'iril«tTO^.'^^i-iiS NfMMpKIMn GAVLORD ••RINTCDINU fi.A '4. Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028956262 THE CANON " Certain adhering partly to these ^Ptolemy's jueasures of the universe\ as if haviftg propounded great conciiisions, and supposed things worthy of reason^ have framed enormous and endless here- sies : and one of these is Colarhasus^ who attempts to explain religion by measures and numbersP — Hippolytus, "Refuta- tion," bk. iv., ch. iii. THE CANON i i AN EXPOSITION OF THE PAGAN MYSTERY PER: PET VATED IN THE CAB A : LA AS THE RVLE OF ALL THE ARTS s«- ^,L/..f/^/^ sr^'^AMM WITH A PREFACE ^ BY R. B. CVNNINGHAME GRAHAM MO LONDON: ELKIN MATHEWS VIGO STREET, W. JiSgy All rights reserved. CHISWICK PRESS :— CHARLES WHITTINGHAM AND CO. TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON, 1K THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED WITH EVERY FEELING OF REGARD TO HIS FRIEND H. W. H. D. BY THE AUTHOR PREFACE TO "SYMBOLISTS." Contempt of ancient learning is a sure sign of an enlightened mind. We are the men. Before our time, reason but little influenced mankind. The demonstration of the above assertion being that in times gone by there were no railways, steamboats, torpedoes, or any of those anaesthetic inventions in regard to time and space on which we pride ourselves, and upon which we base our claim to have advanced the general welfare of man- kind. Marvels of science, mechanical improvements, increase of wealth (and income tax), and the per- fection of all warlike apparatus, seem to blind us to the fact that abstract qualities of mind have shown no symptoms of progression. A rich bar- barian, pale and dyspeptic, florid or flatulent, seated in a machine travelling at eighty miles an hour, with the machine luxuriously upholstered and well heated, and yet the traveller's mind a blank, or only occupied with schemes to cheat his fellows Vin PRKFACE. and advance himself is, in the abstract, no advance upon a citizen of Athens, in the time of Pericles, who never travelled faster than a bullock cart could take him, in all his life. Science has no marvels ; every so-called dis- covery heralded as marvellous (for men of science understand the power of bold advertisement to the full as well as scientists in clog dancing, in hair dressing, and tightrope walking), is not a marvel in the true meaning of the word. The Rontgen Rays, the microphone, the phono- graph, are all as simple in themselves as is the property of amber rubbed to take up straws. From the beginning there have been Rontgen Rays, and the principles of microphone and phonograph are coeval with the world. The wonder lies not in the discovery (so-called), but in the fact they have remained so long unknown. The real mystery of mysteries is the mind of man. Why, with a pen or brush, one man sits down and makes a master- piece, and yet another, with the selfsame instru- ments and opportunities, turns out a daub or botch, is twenty times more curious than all the musings of the mystics, works of the Rosicrucians, or the mechanical contrivances which seem to-day so fine, and which our children will disdain as clumsy. The conquests of the mind never grow stale, let he who doubts it read a page of Plato and compare it with some a la mode philosopher. I take it that one of the objects of the author of this work is to sustain, that in astronomy, in mathematics, and in certain other branches of learn- PREFACE. IX ing, the ancients knew a good deal more than modern men of science care to admit. Knowledge to-day Is not diffused, as writers in newspapers, makers of almanacks, members of school-boards, and worthy men who seethe means but cannot grasp the fullness of achievement, are never tired of stating, but on the contrary, goes almost contraband. The fact that all can read and write, cypher and scan the columns of a newspaper, can tell the latitude (the longitude more rarely) of Jella Coffee, can prattle innocently of literature, art, spiritualism, and chemistry, can make their per- tinent remarks upon theosophy, discuss religion, say a word in season on lithotomy, and generally comport themselves as If their minds were fashioned after the pattern of a kaleidoscope, does not go far to prove the claim of wide extended knowledge. When all write books and few have time to read, when thought grows rare and talking never ends, a serious book in which a man has put the labour of his life needs some apology for its appearance. Deal with sex problems (pruriently, of course), be mystic, moral, or immoral, flippant, or best of all be dull, success is sure. Still, In an age of sym- bolism, for everything we see Is but a symbol, as kings, queens, dukes, lords, princes, barons, and sandwichmen, it must perforce be interesting to some to read of why the chief symbol of our present faith came to be held In veneration. In modern times we use a word, merely to express a thing, and only rarely concern ourselves with the exact value that the word may have. X PREFACE. This may account to some extent for the loos style of many English writers, but to examine int that would be quite foreign to my purpose. Cei tain it is that in the ancient world, words and eve letters all had their value apart from what we, now a-days, call meaning. Thus it is that orients nations, and especially the Jews and Arabs, attac to their particular alphabets not merely a divin origin (for I suppose our alphabet is just as divin as theirs), but a particular sense of sanctity. N one supposes if a better alphabet than that we noi employ were to be found that we should still ad here from superstitious motives to our own. In th ancient world, apart from letters, every ceremony each rite, and all the arts and sciences had som peculiar canon which was supposed to govern then If, in his researches, the author has brought to ligli some canon which may enlighten architects, an so redeem us from the outrages our builders hea upon us. if he can do even a little to stay the hand of Deans and Chapters from destroying building which, by the folly of the nation, have been con: mitted to their care (like sheep to wolves), or put stop to the restorer, that arch-fiend, who in cor suming thirst for unity tears down a fine Renai; sance door-way in a Gothic church, and puts up i its stead what he thinks Gothic, his labour will nc have been lost. Could he redeem us from Victoria Queen Anne — but mitigate the horrors of platt glass, set bounds to all the Gothics, ranging froi Strangulated, through the degrees of Congregs tional and Convulsional down to Ebenezaresqui PREFACE. XI could he but find a style in which our builders could express their thoughts, and help them build for us, our churches, houses, theatres, and bridges, without adhering slavishly to bygone styles, the twelve shillings which I understand his volume is to cost will be well spent. Music and literature, with painting, surgery, and economics, with boxing, fencing, and others of the liberal arts, all have a style fit and peculiar to the times, but architecture yet remains a blot and a disgrace to those who live by it, and to all those who use the edifices which it makes, and pay the makers' bills. But leaving architects bemired in stucco and happy in their '* co-operation with the present system," let us return to the folly of the ancients. Strabo and Celsus, with Diodorus Siculus, Ammianus Marcellinus, Maimonides, Raimundo Llull, with the Rabbi Jehudah ben Gabirol and others, whose names look well writ large in a quotation, have all remarked upon the symbolism not only of the Cross but of all ancient temples. Pedro Mexia in his curious Silva^ de Varia Leccion says that the Egyptians and the Arabians honoured the figure of the cross,^ and thought so much of it, that the Egyptians drew it upon the ^ " Madrid," por Joseph Fernandez de Buendia, Ano de 1662. ^ The Inca, Garcilaso de la Vega, in his "Comentarios Reales," vol. i., chap, iii., "Tuvieron los Reyes Incas en el Cozco, una Cruz de Marmol fine de color bianco y encarnado. .... No adoravan en ella, mas de que la tenian en veneracion ; debia ser por su hermosa figura, 6 por algun o^ro respeio^ que no saben decir." XU PREFACE. Statue of Serapis, adored it, and held it as a god. To comprehend which it is necessary first to know the Arabians of old times were people very learned in the heavens, and in the phases of the stars . . . made images and statues . . . rings and other things, taking care to do so, at certain times and epochs when the planets and other stars were in a certain posture." And further on he says, " it is re- markable how the Egyptians esteemed the symbol of the cross above all other symbols." It may be that, as Pedro Mexia says, the Egyptians looked upon the cross as something sacred, because it is '* a perfect and most excellent figure geometrically considered." All things are possible, but a whole people lost in the admiration of a figure for geometric reasons seems improb- able. Geometry is a most admirable science, but appeals little to imagination, and still less to any of the well rooted principles of folly inherent in mankind, which generally impel them to choose a subject to adore. Again Antonio Llobera, in his book called *' El Porque de Todas las Ceremonias," printed at Figueras by Ignacio Porter in 1758, informs us that " all temples and churches are symbols or figures of the human body . . . the high altar is the head, the transepts are the arms, and the rest of the temple ... is the body," so that he knew apparently, that churches were built according to a canon and had assumed the form in which we know them for a special reason. Many have known as much as did Antonio Llobera, and like PREFACE. Xlll him either have cared not, or have dared not, push their theory to its conclusion. The author of the present work has not been so deterred, and argues out his case with much pre- cision and a wealth of figures, proving most clearly that the external measurements of almost every ancient temple, the figures of the New Jerusalem, Holy Oblation, and other temples, real and imagin- ary, reveal the magnitudes of the sun, moon, and other planets, together with the distance of their orbits. And most ingeniously he argues that, as all these calculations were, of necessity, impossible of comprehension to the vulgar, they were typified by symbols, the principal of all these symbols being the cross. Therefore it follows, in his opinion, that the rage of the so-called Reformers of the church was not a blind unreasoning fury, blended with a dislike to beauty, but a reasoning fury against a symbol that they understood. And he remarks, when speak- ing of the Puritans, whom he most justly stigma- tizes as both "ridiculous and ignorant," that it was curious that, having cast away the cross, they should still retain the Christ, as both are one. We know the mystic letters I. H. S., familiar from our childhood on altar fronts, embroidered in gold thread by pious ladies, were used as symbols of Bacchus, and venerated in his temples by the unreasoning but faithful worshipper just as they are with us. Thor's hammer was a cross ; the ruins of Palenque bear sculptured on their lintels the mystic symbol, and Bernal Diaz tells us that, in XIV PREFACE. Cozumel, upon the altars of the temples, crosses were seen deep graven in the stone. Thus it appears that almost every nation, every age, has had its Cross, and, if this is the case, what is the reason ? The writer of this work most plainly sets it forth, and, in so doing, connects conclusively our symbolism with that which seems inherent in mankind, and gently puts aside all our pretensions to the possession of a faith revealed to us alone. Into these mysteries I shrink from entering, but watch him boldly walk amongst the Canon Laws which govern Architecture, Music, Religion, and other things, the laws of which I take on trust. Unorthodox even in his unorthodoxy, he is sufficiently un-English to be logical and not to shirk, after the English fashion, the just conclusions towards which his reasoning leads. Following his argument, it appears that, in "The Abbey" when the nave and aisles are packed with rich and pious Iris de Florence scented worshippers silently waiting for the cir- culating plate, they sit within a building built, like the ancient temples were, to typify the body of a man, and the chief symbol which the Romans held in honour they, too, venerate, when, in their pious contemplation, they lift adoring eyes towards the Cross which stands upon the altar or com- munion table. R. B. CUNNINGHAME GrAHAM. CONTENTS. CHAP. PAGE I. Introduction i II. The Holy Oblation i6 III. The Cabala . • 39 IV. Noah's Ark . 68 V. Names of the Gods 82 VI. The Holy Rood . 139 VII. The Tower of Babel 157 VIII. The Temples . 183 IX, Freemasonry . 238 X. Music of the Spheres 258 XL Ritual . 275 XII. Geography . 301 XIII. Rhetoric 334 Index ■ ^QQ ERRATA. Page 4, line i6, read or before "Rome.'' Pages 48, 133, lines 33, 5, read " Tetragrammaton." Page 65, line 27, read " 1,110." Page 102, line 26, insert the before "sequence." Page 104, line i, read Greek before "Zodiac." Page 122, line 14, insert is after " 2,047." Page 128, line 3, read " 592 " for " 562." Page 142, line 4, read (^/before "notice." Page 188, line 28, read Dio7tysus for " Dionysius." Page 276, line 35, read "peoples." Page 279, omit Note i. Page 288, line 23, insert the before "Mass." THE CANON. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. " The wisdom of the Egyptians^ what was it but principally astronomy V — St. Augustine, "City of God," bk. xviii., c. 39. The failure of all efforts in modern times to dis- cover what constituted the ancient canon of the arts, has made this question one of the most hope- less puzzles which antiquity presents. It is dis- couraging in the extreme to approach the subject at all. The absence of all explicit information from the ancients themselves, combined with the com- plete ignorance of modern authorities, is sufficient to make one hesitate to lay before the reader any proposition, however plausible, on this obscure sub- ject. It is hoped, however, that the investigation of what appears to be a clue to the method practised by the old architects in building the temples, may prove of some assistance in eluci- dating the principles, which were the common groundwork of the arts and sciences of the past. For it would appear, that there was an established canonical law underlying the practice of building as well as all other arts. In a general way this has been felt by all com- petent students of antiquity ; and many traces of such an uniformity have been pointed out, but as the root of everything in the old world was 2 THE CANON. primarily centred in religion, it is to the Incier theology, that we must look for the fouidatio and basis of the old canon. j The priests were practically the masters of th old world. Everything and everybody was sut servient to the ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and n work could be undertaken without its authority That the priests were legitimately entitled t regulate the building of the temples of the god nobody will deny. And that they d\d exercis this control is beyond dispute. For we find ths freemasons, or some body corresponding to th mediaeval freemasons, with exclusive privilege and secrets required for building the temple: under ecclesiastical authority, have always existec And the knowledge which we possess of th mediaeval freemasons is sufficient to show the their secrets were the secrets of religion, that i of mediaeval Christianity. It is these secrets of the old priests, carefull guarded by them, and only communicated to th authorized builders of the temples, that we propos to treat of in the following pages, and we sha endeavour to show that these secrets, comprisin the esoteric doctrine of religion, have been tran; mitted in unbroken continuity, at least from th building of the Great Pyramid, down to recer times. It is, of course, far beyond the scope ( this small work, limited to a single object of ii quiry, to enter into a historical examination of th evidences of this continuity of idea, and since thei are already in existence books dealing with th special investigation, it is superfluous to undertal^ it. It is only necessary to accept the testimony < the old Greek historians, who emphatically asser that the essential doctrines of the Greek religic were imported into Greece from Egypt. W know that all modern civilization in Europe is < INTRODUCTION. 3 Greek origin. The Gospel itself is indisputably as much a Greek as a Hebrew creation. It is written in Greek, and was first established among Hellenized peoples, and wherever it was accepted in succeeding generations, it brought with it the ideas of Greece. As there is no reason to doubt the assertions , of the Greek historians, as to the indebtedness of their nation to the Egyptians for instruction in the arts and sciences, there has clearly been, through the Greeks, a direct com- munication of Egyptian ideas to the Hellenized portions of the world, to which we ourselves belong. Just as Pythagoras and Plato, and other Greek philosophers, visited Egypt to study the religion and sciences of that country, so every educated man of a subsequent age studied the religion and philosophy of Greece with the same object, namely, to perfect themselves in that knowledge, of which the Greeks were known to have been the re- cipients. To us the Egyptians are only a step further off ; but fundamentally the doctrines which we are now investigating were the same both in Greece and Egypt. How much, the original religion and philosophy of the Egyptians may have been improved by filtering through the refining influence of Greece, must be decided when Egyptologists come to have a deeper knowledge of Egyptian things, than they have at present. But whatever changes may have been added by Greeks and Christians to the original Egyptian theology, it is insisted, that the central mysteries were accepted by all priests and philosophers, as the only possible basis of religion. And more than that (for we must not always be content with a sensible reason for anything in human affairs) the absolute conservatism, always observed in religious matters, would scarcely admit that any 4 THE CANON. received doctrine, once established, should be removed. It must be borne in mind, that only the vaguest ideas at present prevail as to the mystical secrets ^ of the old priests. Everybody knows that the Egyptians, Greeks, and other Eastern nations concealed the vital doctrines of their theology from the ignorant and vulgar, and it was only by a gradual process of initiation that the meaning of the sacred writings and ceremonies were explained. And then, after this preparation, the initiates were allowed to be full partakers in the religious rites. It is a misfortune that all the ritual of the older religions has been destroyed, and it is particularly regretable that no scrap of the sacred writings, or temple ritual of pagan Greece of Rome, has sur- vived to our time. We do not even know whether the Hebraized or Christianized version of the Masonic ritual, as we now know it, has anything more than a faint resemblance to its primitive form. Besides the ordinary services in the pagan temples, it is well known that there were in certain periods especially mysterious celebrations of the nature of dramatic shows or plays, in some cases apparently intended to form the concluding spec- tacle of the initiations. A few ancient authors have alluded to these shows, but when everything is collected from their works, it amounts to very little indeed. Plutarch, St. Clement of Alexandria ' To avoid misunderstanding, it may be stated here, that throughout the present inquiry the doctrine of the mysteries is assumed to have been a defined scientific tradition, communi- cated orally to the initiates or mystics, who secretly passed it on from generation to generation. Therefore, mysticism be- ing synonymous with gnosticism, it must not be confounded with the speculative mistiness which is cultivated by certain dreamy philosophers of our day. The mystic (jiii.(rr^c) in the old sense has naturally become extinct, together with the gnosis which formerly instructed him. INTRODUCTION. 5 (who had been initiated at Eleusis before he be- came a Christian), Lucian, Apuleius, Macrobius and other writers give some sHght information, directly or indirectly, on these mystical ceremonies. Besides these, there is a treatise by Jamblichus pretending to expound the whole subject of the mysteries, but this work has been composed with such careful and scrupulous obscurity, that few people have found themselves much the wiser after reading it. There is also the Jewish Cabala, containing an explanation of the priestly secrets and mysteries of the Hebrews, but no one at the present day can fully understand it. There are the works attributed to Hermes Trismegistus preserved by the Neo-Platonists, written in the same philosophical jargon used by Jamblichus and the rest ; and there are the references to the doc- trines of the heretical Christians called Gnostics, preserved in the controversial works of the early fathers. These are some of the most direct sources of information on the mystical doctrines common to the Egyptian, Greek, Hebrew, and Christian religions. But turning from these obscure and fragmentary references, the law of the Hebrew Scriptures and the extensive commentaries of the Talmud, the Gospel with the offices and ritual of the Church, are each an epitome, in its most complete form, of those mysteries for the expounding of which they were severally created ; if these works were clearly understood the difficulty would be cleared up. The deplorable fact, which we have now to regret is, that the priests who ought to be able to tell us the meaning of the Scriptures, which they undertake to expound, know nothing whatever of their real significance. 1 1 is probable, that there is not a single Christian priest who knows what the Canon of the Church is, or why a certain office or literary ar- 6 THE CANON. rangement Is canonical or what makes it so. He would deny that the Old Testament and the Gospel are allegorical books, but has no explanation to offer for the absurdities, which occur in these works, if taken literally. In fact, the modern priest, to whom we naturally turn for instruction in the mys- teries of the Church, is the very last person from whom we are likely to get any information. Let us therefore leave this man, who does not seem to be aware that his office was created that he might receive the canonical tradition from the mouth of a pre-ordained teacher, and by its light impart the spirit to the letter of the law. We shall assume, that at the building of the Great Pyramid, the first principles of all later theology were already established and fixed, and it would seem, notwithstanding the modern belief to the contrary, that at that early period the Egypti- ans had arrived at some elementary knowledge of astronomy and cosmography ; that they knew the measures of the earth, and the distance of the planets, and had observed the recurrent cycles of the sun and moon in their several orbits, and many other simple astronomical phenomena ; that from these ascertained facts, they derived a scheme em- bodying, in the persons of certain hypothetical gods, a symbolical image of the created universe, and the invisible powers which regulate it. The deity in this scheme was conceived according to the exact forms manifested in the phenomena of nature. The whole physical and material universe was symbolized by the seven revolving planets and the sphere of the fixed stars, while the agent, or mover, who inspires all bodies with life, was personified by the figure of a man. Thus the phi- losophers constructed a system, which attributed to God a body composed of all the matter of the world, and a soul, which was diffused through all INTRODUCTION. 7 its parts. The creed of the philosophers, however, was never openly avowed in the popular religion, but was concealed in the parables of which the old theology was composed. For the old priests never scrupled to believe, that history and philosophy " sufficed but for the chosen few," while the popu- lace were carefully instigated to the practice of morality by being instructed in that kind of fiction which, in this country, emanates from Exeter Hall. Strabo admirably expresses the attitude of an educated man to the religion of his day. He says, " The great mass of women and common people cannot be induced by mere force of reason to de- vote themselves to piety, virtue, and honesty ; superstition must therefore be employed, and even this is insufficient without the aid of the marvellous and the terrible. For what are the thunderbolts, the segis, the trident, the torches, the dragons, the barbed thyrses, the arms of the gods, and all the paraphernalia of antique theology, but fables em- ployed by the founders of states as bugbears to frighten timorous minds ? " (Strabo s " Geography," bk. i., ch. ii, § 8).^ Again, the difference between Moses, and Linus, Musseus, Orpheus, and Phe- recydes, is well defined by Origen, who says, that the Greek poets " display little concern for those readers who are to peruse them at once unaided, but have composed their philosophy (as you term it) for those who are unable to comprehend its meta- phorical and allegorical signification. Whereas Moses, like a distinguished orator, who meditates some figure of rhetoric, and who carefully intro- duces in every part a language of twofold meaning, has done this in his five books ; neither affording, ^ Cicero, who was an Augur as well as an Advocate, did not seem to have taken his duties very seriously, for he is reported to have said that he could never understand how two Augurs could look each other in the face without laughing. 8 THE CANON. in the portion which relates to morals, any handle to his Jewish subjects for committing evil ; nor yet giving to the few individuals who were endowed with greater wisdom, and who were capable of investigating his meaning, a treatise devoid of material for speculation." (Origen " Against Celsus/' bk. i., ch. xviii). That is to say, the Hebrew delivered his fictions in the guise of moral precepts, while the pagan Greeks were not so par- ticular. It is well known to many people that certain numbers had an important place in the philo- sophical and theological system of the ancients. The Pythagoreans concealed their doctrines in a numerical and geometric system, which was the only form of their philosophy given to the outer world. The Jewish priests also elaborated an ex- tensive system of numeration in the Cabala, and the Rabbis frequently make use of it in the Tal- mudic commentaries on the Scriptures. The early fathers of the church have preserved considerable expositions of the system in their books con- troverting the heretical opinions of the various sects of Christian Gnostics. But the purport of all these theories of numbers has ceased to be understood, together with the greater part of the doctrines of the ancient mysteries of which this numerical philosophy formed a part. The oldest use of numbers as symbols of an esoteric doctrine is to be found in Egypt, from whence it was derived by the Greeks, and trans- mitted by them to the modern world. Although we have, unfortunately, no direct evidence of how the mysterious people of Egypt actually made use of their numbers, it would appear that their numerical system formed a part of the dogma in those laws, referred to by Plato as having been ten thousand years old, and was perpetuated, as one INTRODUCTION. 9 of the bases of religion and art by all subsequent peoples. The words of Plato are : " Long ago they appeared to recognize the very principle of which we are now speaking — that their young citizens must be habituated to forms and strains of virtue. These they fixed, and exhibited patterns of them in their temples ; and no painter or artist is allowed to innovate upon them, or to leave the traditional forms, or invent new ones. To this day no alteration is allowed, either in those arts or in music, at all. And you will find that their works of art are |painted or moulded in the same forms that they had ten thousand years ago (this is literally true, and no exaggeration), their ancient paintings and sculptures are not a whit better, or worse than the work of to-day, but are made with just the same skill." (" Laws," 656. Jowett's translation, vol, v., p. 226). What this canon of art actually was is now unknown, but it is possible to discover the traces of it in the religion and art of the Greeks and Christians. Theology, in its various forms, has always been the epitome of art, and constituted the law for its guidance. From the times of ancient Egypt this law has been a sacred arcanum, only communicated by symbols and parables, the making of which, in the ancient world, constituted the most important form of literary art ; it therefore required for its exposition a priestly caste, trained in its use, and the guilds of initiated artists, which existed throughout the world till comparatively recent times, were instructed in it. Now-a-days, all this is changed. Theology has dropped her secrets ; her symbols have become meaningless ornaments, and her parables are no longer understood. The artist in the service of the Church no longer repre- sents her mysteries in metaphorical shapes, and the priests have as little skill in the old art of lO THE CANON. myth-making, as they have in interpreting the Scriptures. Few people have an adequate appreciation of this lost principle— the art, that is, of working symbolically. To us, who have now nothing to conceal, such a practice has naturally gone out of fashion, and the symbol, as a means of concealing rather more than it was intended to explain, has become gradually obsolete. We still write or paint symbolically, but only to make that, which is ob- scure, more plain. In the hands of the old priest, or artist, on the contrary, the symbol was a veil for concealment, beautiful or grotesque, as the case might be. A myth or parable, in their hands, subtly conveyed a hidden truth, by means of a more or less obvious fiction ; but it has come to pass, that the crude and childish lie on its surface is ignorantly believed for the whole truth, instead of being recognized, as the mere clue to its inner meaning. All theology is composed in this way, and her two-fold utterances must be read with a double mind. Thus, when we read in the Scrip- tures of the Church, or in the saintly legends, a fiction showing more than ordinary exuberance of fancy, we may be sure, that our attention is being specially arrested. When miraculous events are related of the gods, or when they are depicted in marvellous shapes, the author gives us to under- stand, that something uncommon is being con- veyed. When singular and unearthly beasts are described, such as Behemoth and Leviathan, the unicorn, or the phoenix, it is intended, that we should search deeply into their meaning : for such are some of the artifices, by which the ancients at once concealed and explained their hidden mysteries. When everything was mystical and metaphorical, it was only natural that numbers should have INTRODUCTION. I I been brought to the service of Art. Geometry also provided a symbolical code, which may some day be understood. These geometrical symbols enabled the mathematicians to import the secret mysteries into their works, and also gave to the builders a means of applying a numerical system to the temples, which, as Plato says, exhibited the pattern of the laws in Egypt. Considerable traces of this symbolical geometry survive in the arcana of Freemasonry. Most of the practical secrets of the old mediaeval architects, who built the cathedrals according to the mysteries of the church, have perished with the old craft lodges, which preceded the establishment of the modern theo- retical masonry. Nevertheless it is possible to gather out of the early architectural and technical books some clue to the old practice of building. All old writers on architecture, as well as free- masons, insist that geometry is the foundation of their art, but their hints as to its application are so obscure, that no one in recent times has been able to explain how it was used. Philosophy must have been equally dependent upon some system of geometry, for Plato wrote over the door of his academy " let none ignorant OF geometry enter here," and in the " Republic" (bk. vii. 527), he says, " You must in the utmost possible manner direct the citizens of your beautiful city on no account to fail to apply themselves to geometry" — a science which, he says, " flatly con- tradicts the language employed by those who handle it." From this it may be concluded, that Plato meant to inform us, that no one could un- derstand his philosophy without knowing the geo- metrical basis of it, since geometry contained the fundamental secret of all the ancient science. It is known both to freemasons and architects, that the mystical figure called the Vesica Piscis, so 12 THE CANON. popular in the Middle Ages, and generally placed as the first proposition of Euclid, was a symbol applied by the masons in planning their temples. Albert Durer, Serlio, and other architectural writers depict the Vesica in their works, but presumably because an unspeakable mystery attached to it these authors make no reference to it. Thomas Kerrich, a freemason and principal librarian of the University of Cambridge, read a paper upon this mystical figure before the Society of Antiquaries on January 20th, 1820. He illustrated his remarks with many diagrams illustrating its use by the ancient masons, and piously concludes by saying," I would by no means indulge in conjectures as to the reference these figures might possibly have to the most sacred mysteries of religion."^ Dr. Oliver, (** Discrep." p. 109) speaking of the Vesica, says, " This mysterious figure Vesica Piscis possessed an unbounded influence on the details of sacred architecture ; and it constituted the great and en- during secret of our ancient brethren. The plans of religious buildings were determined by its use ; and the proportions of length and height were dependent on it alone." ^ Mr. Clarkson (In- troductory Essay to Billings' *' Temple Church") considered that the elementary letters of the primitive language were derived from the same mystical symbol. He says that it was known to Plato and " his masters in the Egyptian colleges," and was to the old builders ** an arche- type of idea] beauty." The Vesica was also regarded as a baneful object under the name of ' The west is the feminine end of a Christian church, and the western gables of Gothic cathedrals are often lighted by a rose-window, or one in the shape of the Vesica Piscis, as at Dunblane. ^ See also the article in Gwilt's " Encyclopsedia ■ of Archi tecture" (1876), p. 968. INTRODUCTION. 1 3 the ** Evil Eye," and the charm most generally- employed to avert the dread effects of its fascina- tion was the Phallus (J. Millinger" Archseologia," xix). In Heraldry the Vesica was used as the feminine shield. It was interchangeable with the Fusill, or Mascle (Guillim's " Display of Heraldry," 4th ed; 1660, § iv., ch. xix., p. 354), and was also figured as a lozenge or rhombus. In the East the Vesica was used as a symbol of the womb, and was joined to the cross by the Egyptians forming the handle of the Crux ansata. Geometrically, the Vesica is constructed from two intersecting circles, so that it may be taken as FIG. I. — THE VESICA PISCIS. having a double significance. Edward Clarkson says that it " means astronomically at the present day a starry conjunction ; and by a very intelligent transfer of typical ideas a divine marriage," or the two-fold essence of life, which the ancients sup- posed to be male and female. To every Christian the Vesica is familiar from its constant use in early art, for not only was it an attribute of the Virgin, and the feminine aspect of the Saviour as sym- bolized by the wound'^ in his side, but it commonly surrounds the figure of Christ, as His Throne when seated in Glory. As a hieroglyph the combination ^ All the early writers declare that this mystic wound emitted blood and water at the Crucifixion, and it is never omitted in the works of the early masters. 14 THE CANON. of Christ with the Vesica is analogous to the Crux ansata of the Egyptians. Besides the Vesica Piscis the old philosophers and freemasons were accustomed to use as sym- bols all the plane geometrical figures. The Pytha- gorean emblem, the Pentalpha, or five-pointed star, and the Hexalpha, or Solomon's Seal, have been used in the church from time immemorial as sym- bols of Christ and the Trinity, and have a variety of emblematic associations. The Hexagon was the common symbol of the Masonic Cube or Cubical Stone, while the Triangle, and Square had each their use as geometrical symbols. The Cross has also been from the remotest times a potent mystical emblem among all ancient peoples. Crosses were generally of three kinds, the Tau Cross, the upright or Jerusalem Cross, and the Saltire or diagonal Cross, and each had its peculiar significance. Everybody knows, that the Greek and Hebrew letters had each a numerical value, so that every word in these languages may be resolved into a number, by adding together the value of each letter of which it is composed. ABrAE«rZH0IKAMN 123 4567 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 EOnPSTTO XTfl 60 70 80 1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 70 60 5J, 40 3 2q» 10 98765432 I 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 go So Thus the word iesovs zr 888, christos = 1,480, LOGOS = 373, the Hebrew word, Messiah rr 358, IHVH (Jehovah) = 26, zeusi= 612, mithras =360, and ABRAXAS = 365. Of course no one supposes "^ ] ) ^ -n now, that the numerical value of the name christos has any particular significance, or that the number 1 ,48ois anythingbut an accidental number, produced by adding together the letters which form the Greek word for "Anointed ; " nevertheless, we believe, that the word christos was carefully selected by the Greeks, who constructed the Christian theology, in order to exemplify the old Gnosticism, which forms the basis of Christianity in common with every other old religious system. This number 1,480, as will be shown further on, accurately exhibits an important measure of the Cosmos, and was, apparently, chosen to be the foundation of the scientific pantheism upon which the Christian theology is built, and was a part of the Gnosis, primarily derived from those laws of the priestly astronomers of ancient Egypt, who first devised the canon, which became a fundamental principle in the Greek, Jewish, and Christian Law. But there is no apparent evidence, that the Jews and Christians possessed a sufficiently exact know- ledge of the Cosmic scheme, to introduce any of its dimensions into the names of the Deity. And so it would appear. But the meaning of those works which make up the canon of the Scriptures are no longer understood, and although the know- ledge of which we are speaking is carefully pre- served in these Scriptures, so unintelligible have they become, that no one at the present day appears to be aware of its existence. CHAPTER II. THE HOLY OBLATION. '"''Perusing the nine last chapters of EzekieVs prophecy^ whilst I hoped to find, and feel a solid body, / only grasped the flitting aire, or rather a meer spirit ; I mean instead of a literall sense I found the Canaan by him described no Geography, but OURANOGRAPHY." — Thomas Fullee, " Pisgah-sight of Pales- tine" (1650), bk. v., p. 189. The publication by Copernicus of the measures of the universe, which are at once straightforward and accurate, was coincident with the Reformation, and the breaking-up of the old mysticism of the Middle Ages. His scheme was printed in 1543 in his celebrated work, " De Revolutionibus Or- bium Coelestium," the first copy of which was placed in his hands a few hours before his death ; but the Pythagorean doctrine of the diurnal motion of the earth, and its revolution round the sun, was taught by him during his life, and received a con- siderable amount of attention at the beginning of the sixteenth century. In the above work, accord- ing to Newcomb(''Pop. Astron./'p. 60), the relative distances of the planets are recorded with fair accuracy, the unit of measurement employed being the interval of the earth's distance from the sun. The measures are : According to Copernicus." According to Newcomb. 5 0*326 0-308 ¥ 0709 0718 © I "000 I -ooo 6 i'373 1-382 % 5*453 5*454 b 9*760 10-070 THE HOLY OBLATION. 1/ The moon's distance he computed at 6o|^ semi- diameters of the earth. At this time it was a dangerous innovation to publish any but the vaguest astronomical facts, and as Copernicus had some anxiety as to how his statement would be received, his friend Rhe- ticus published a volume, giving a preliminary account of the Copernican theory. Although the Papal authorities did not like the work of Coper- nicus, it only received their qualified disapprobation, for they put it on the index ** subject to correction." However, although Copernicus stands as the first of the modern astronomers, he wrote very much in the same mystical strain as his predecessors, and was by no means like an astronomer of the nine- teenth century. What he really appears to have done was to establish a precedent for the open publication of genuine observations, which even the gentle discouragement of the inquisitors was unable to suppress. Whether the measures of the planetary system, which he published, were de- rived from his own observations, or were only the revelation of an existing tradition, it is difficult to determine. But as he is said to have died with- out ever seeing his planet Mercury, presumably he could have made no observations as to the dis- tances of this planet, and consequently must have received his data from some one else. This would imply, that the astronomers before his time knew the distances of the other planets, as well as that of Mercury. Again, if it were possible for Coper- nicus to arrive at the correct proportions of the universe without a telescope, and unaided by any previous observations beyond those which were published, we can see no reason for disbelieving, that the ancients, who are alleged to have gazed at the stars for thousands of years, were incapable of coming to a similarly accurate conclusion. c 1 8 THE CANON. In the next century the fact, that the diameter of the earth's orbit round the sum is 220 diameters of the sun, is, so far as we know, mentioned for the first time — a statement which implies a true know- ledge of the earth's magnitude. This statement is to be found in Galileo's '* System of the World," the work which was condemned by the Inquisitors, and for the publication of which he was arraigned, and prohibited from continuing his astronomical researches, or at least from publishing them. The passage in which the measurement of the sun's distance is given, is such as to make it doubtful if the calculation were made at that time. The con- text is as follows : — ** I suppose with the said Copernicus, and also with his opposers, that the semi-diameter of the grand orb, which is the dis- tance of the earth from the sun, containeth 1,208 semi-diameters of the said earth. Secondly, I premise with the allowance aforesaid, and of truth, that the apparent diameter of the sun, in its mean distance, to be about half a degree, that is 30 min. prim,, which are 1,800 seconds, that is, 108,000 thirds. And because the apparent diameter of a fixed star of the first magnitude is no more than 5 seconds, that is, 300 thirds, and the diameter of a fixed star of the sixth magnitude, 50 thirds (and herein is the greatest error of the anti-Coper- nicans), therefore the diameter of the sun con- taineth the diameter of a fixed star of the sixth magnitude 2,160 times. . . . " The diameter of the sun is 1 1 semi- diameters of the earth, and the diameter of the grand orb contains 2,146 of these same semi- diameters, by the assent of both parties ; so that, the diameter of the said orb contains the sun's diameter 220 times very near. And because the spheres are to one another as the cubes of their diameters, let us make the cube of 220, which THE HOLY OBLATION. 1 9 is 106,480,000, and we shall have the grand orb 106,480,000 times bigger than the sun, to which grand orb a star of the sixth magnitude ought to be equal, according to the assertion of this author. **The error, then, of these men consisteth in being extremely mistaken, in taking the apparent diameter of the fixed stars." (Salusbury's Trans- lation, torn, i., p. 325.) The first assumption in this remarkable passage, namely, the distance from the earth to the sun called the grand orb, is enormously deficient. The distance according to modern calculations is 91,404,000 ^ ... , , = 2^,086 semi-diameters at the least, 3.959 , or about lo times the number stated in the text, that is, if Galileo had given the number at 12,000 instead of 1,200 (12,080), it would have been ap- proximately correct. Again, the diameter of the sun is nearly no diameters of the earth, not 11 semi-diameters, as stated. Whether, in face of this error, it was possible to compute the earth's distance correctly by diameters of the sun, is a question for astronomers to decide. It seems most extraordinary, that, holding such erroneous con- ceptions of the magnitude both of the earth and the sun, he should yet bring out the correct result in his final calculation of their distance, measured by the diameter of the sun. It is also curious, that by multiplying the two numbers 1,208 and 1 1 by 10 we get a real dimension of the sun's diameter and distance. It is true that we have to take the last in diameters instead of semi-diameters to make it right. But, if the whole thing is a mystification, this would be quite sufficient for the purpose, and make detection more difficult. We know that Galileo was delayed for a considerable time before he obtained his privilege to publish this work, and no one knows what alterations he may have 20 THE CANON. been required to make before the Inquisitors, who first sanctioned the book and then condemned it, were satisfied. It is tolerably certain, from what we know of Galileo's stated opinions, that if there had been no censorship he would have published his work in a more direct form, notwithstanding his obliging complacence to the wishes of the priests, when they used their Procrustean persuasion to make him change his mind, and take their view as to how astronomical matters ought to be announced to the world. His non-resistance on this occasion, as well as the obscure and mystical language in which his four tedious dialogues are written, rather favours the idea, that his views differed very little from those of the Inquisitors after all. This tribunal merely disliked the idea of accurate astro- nomical knowledge becoming common property, and Galileo showed no serious objection to gratify them. Kepler and Tycho Brahe, the contempo- raries of Galileo, always kept their disclosures within the bounds of ecclesiastical license, and Kepler never pretended that he spoke otherwise than in parables in his " Mysterium Cosmo- graphicum " — an obviously mystical work, written entirely as an exposition of the old doctrines which we find in the " Timseus " of Plato. All these mystifications resorted to by the astronomers of the sixteenth and seventeenth cen- turies suggest, that there was no real desire on their part to allow the true facts of their science to become generally known, and a sentence of John Hutchinson's implies, that their was nothing new in the disclosures of Copernicus. For he says : " Such as believe that the motions of the orbs were never known before Copernicus, nor philosophy before, or that it was understood by Sir Isaac Newton, let them study their books." ' Again, the ' "The Religion of Satan, or Antichrist deUneated," 1749. THE HOLY OBLATION. 21 assertion, which is so frequently made, that Galileo was the first astronomer who used a telescope, is unsubstantiated by any certain evidence. From a passage in the " Clouds " of Aristophanes we know that the Greeks used burning glasses, and consequently must have known their magnifying powers. Roger Bacon in the thirteenth century alludes to his use of a telescope and microscope. Cornelius Agrippa ('* Vanity of the Arts and Sciences") alludes to experiments with hollow, convex, and other glasses, which make little things appear great, and things afar off near. J. B. Porta (1598) also makes a similar statement: *' Con- cave lenses show distant objects more clearly, convex those which are nearer, whence they may be used to assist the sight. ... If you know rightly how to combine one of each sort, you will see both far and near objects larger and clearer. ... I shall now endeavour to show in what manner we may contrive to recognize our friends at the distance of several miles, and how those of weak sight may read most minute letters from a distance. It is an invention of great utility, and grounded on optical principles, nor is it at all diffi- cult of execution ; but it must be so divulged as not to be understood by the vulgar and yet be clear to the sharp-sightedr (Life of Galileo, p. ) The English mathematician, Leonard Digges, who died about 1573, is supposed to have possessed a telescope which he used in private. The accusers of Galileo called him plagiarist, liar, and impostor, as well as heretic, so his " Invention " may have been merely the disclosure of what everybody up to his time had concealed. At best Galileo only imitated or improved upon the instruments made by the Dutch, a specimen of which was in the possession of Cardinal Borghese before the year 1609. The great interest taken in Galileo's tele- 22 THE CANON. scope at Venice is certainly in favour of its novelty, and bears out the received opinion, that the tele- scope first made its appearance openly at the beginning of the seventeenth century. Since so much uncertainty exists as to the origin of exact astronomical observations, and consider- ing that the ancients devoted such extraordinary attention to the heavenly bodies, it is reasonable to suppose that the Egyptians and Chaldaeans, who are said to have observed the stars for count- less generations, must have arrived at something more than a vague and absurdly inadequate know- ledge of a science to which they had been so long addicted. It is incredible that their knowledge of the magnitude of the planetary system should have been so erroneous as we are generally ex- pected to believe. The fact appears to be, that this science was a part of the hidden doctrine of the mysteries, and was consequently withheld from the uninitiated. The practice of astronomy among the Egyptians is repeatedly alluded to by Herodotus, Diodorus, and all early authorities. Strabo saw at Heliopolis *'The houses of the priests and the residences of Plato and Eudoxus . . . Eudoxus came here with Plato, and accord- ing to some writers, lived thirteen years in the society of the priests, for the latter were distin- guished by their knowledge of the heavenly bodies, but were mysterious and uncommunicative, yet after a time they were prevailed upon by courtesy to acquaint them with some of the principles of their science, but the barbarians concealed the greater part of them," He says further, that the later Greek astronomers derived much knowledge from the records of the priests and the Chaldseans. It is also certain that the myths and fables of all early peoples contain veiled allusions to astro- nomical facts, and could afford us definite informa- THE HOLY OBLATION. 23 tion, if we had the key to their interpretation, and they are in fact the only records which it was then considered desirable to preserve. Sir Isaac Newton, for instance, who was not likely to be deceived in astronomical matters, deduces the date of the Argonautic Expedition from the sphere of Mus3eus (" Chron.," pp. 82, 95). He entirely accepts the reality of this primitive sphere, con- structed by a mythical person, the master of Orpheus, and further proves his date from the observations of Thales, Meton, and Hipparchus. To Sir Isaac Newton this story of the Argonauts is quite real, as regards the astronomy, and is apparently regarded by him as the ordinary mytho- logical manner of recording a date. He never questions its accuracy beyond saying that the observations of the ancients were coarse. That this is the true attitude to be taken towards such early writings we have no doubt, and until these are systematically read with a view of ascertaining their hidden meaning, all ancient history must remain as at present a grotesque absurdity. The Christians, from the outset of their exist- ence, seem to have deliberately destroyed all the early works on astronomy. The New Sect had no doubt the same reason for this course of action as for the persecution of astronomers in later times. Nevertheless, out of the fragments of the classical writers, we get some idea of what was known in their time. The following passage from Strabo (bk. ii,, ch. V.) gives some notion of what he knew, or rather what he cared to tell on this sub- ject : " The earth and heaven are spheroidal. The tendency of all bodies having weight, is to a centre. Further, the earth, being spheroidal, and having the same centre as the heavens, is motion- less as well as the axis, which passes through both it and the heavens. The heavens turn round both 24 THE CANON. the earth, and its axis from east to west. . , . While the planets, the sun, and the moon describe certain oblique circles comprehended within the Zodiac. Admitting these points in whole or in part, astronomers proceed to treat of other matters [such as] the motions [of the stars], their revolu- tions, eclipses, size, relative distance, and a thou- sand similar particulars. . . . The heavens and the earth must be supposed to be divided each into five zones, the celestial zone to possess the same names as those below. . . . These zones may be distinguished by circles drawn parallel to the equator on either side of it. Two of these will separate the torrid from the temperate zones, and the remaining two the temperate from the frigid. . . . Likewise the torrid zone, which is divided into two halves by the equator, is distinguished as having a northern and southern side." In a general way, this is substantially what a modern astronomer would tell us, with the excep- tion that in the old system the earth took the place of the sun, and it is noticeable, that Strabo says, that it is the business of an astronomer to ascertain the size and relative distances of the heavenly bodies. Several ancient computations of the measures of the universe, claiming to be accurate, have sur- vived to our time. Such as the distances of the planetary orbits recorded by Ptolemy, and the calculation of the earth's circumference made by Eratosthenes. Ptolemy's measurements are very obviously wrong, and curiously enough this seems to be well known to Hippolytus, who, after quoting the figures, thus concludes an ironical passage: "Oh pride of vain-toiling soul, and incredible belief, that Ptolemy should be considered pre- eminently wise among those who have cultivated similar wisdom" ("Refutation of all Heresies,"' THE HOLY OBLATION. 2$ bk. iv., c. xii.). Eratosthenes gives the earth*s circumference at 250,000 stadia; but it is impos- sible to decide whether this was a true estimate, since we have no positive information as to the value of the stadium he used. He made his observations in Egypt, and arrived at his result according to the methods practised at the present day. He had the advantage of using the astro- nomical appliances anciently established at Alex- andria, and as librarian to the great library he had access to all the available astronomical know- ledge of the Egyptians. He was, moreover, in every way qualified for the task, so that it must be almost a certainty that his calculation was sub- stantially correct. Little or nothing being now known about the Alexandrian standard measures, speculations based upon any hypothetical value of the stadium of Eratosthenes can only lead to doubtful results. Nevertheless it is not an un- reasonable supposition that the Egyptians and Greeks had accurately computed the measure- ments of the earth. To discover the precise knowledge of the ancients as to the measures of the universe, it is first necessary to determine the standards of measurement which were generally in use. Un- fortunately our ignorance on this essential point makes all inquiries on the subject extremely hazardous and difficult. If the British standard measure of length be examined, it would appear that the division of its component parts has been derived from the ascertained diameter of the earth. It is well known that the modern French standard constructed in the last century, was deduced from a fraction of the earth's circumference, possibly In accordance with a more ancient precedent. The antiquity of our English standard is unknown, there being apparently no allusion to it before the 26 THE CANON. time of Elizabeth. The Druids were credited by- Julius Caesar, and other writers, with a consider- able knowledge of astronomy, and must conse- quently have possessed a set of measures, but whether the original British standard of the Druids was preserved during the Roman and subsequent invasions, and is that which now survives, is un- certain. In any case the following coincidences may be pointed out, and need not be regarded as being purely accidental. The number of British miles in the mean diameter of the earth is in round numbers 7,920. The polar diameter is 7,899, and the equatorial diameter is 7,926, giving 7,918 as the exact mean. But 7,920, being a more con- venient number, may be accepted as the reputed amount. Now the British furlong contains 7,920 inches. It also contains 220 yards and no fathoms, which are respectively the diameter and radius of the earth s orbit measured by the diameter of the sun. A mile contains 1,760 yards, and an equilateral triangle, inscribed within in the orbit of Saturn measured by the diameter of the sun, measures about 1,760 diameters on each of its sides. Therefore the British standard records three important measures of the cosmic system. Assuming that these coincidences are the result, not of accident but of design, we are led to the conclusion that at some time, possibly very remote, the dimensions of the cosmos were ascertained, and introduced into the standard measures in- herited by the English people. Another coincid- ence, lately discovered, is that the English quarter measure is exactly a quarter of the capacity of the coffer of the Great Pyramid, which suggests a connection between our measures and those of the builders of Egypt. There are other reasons for supposing that this coincidence between the English standard and that of the Great Pyramid THE HOLY OBLATION. 27 is not accidental, but these must be discussed further on. For the present the reader must be asked to assume that a standard measure, corresponding to that in use in England, was known to the Egyptians, Hebrews, and Greeks, and was mystically employed to register the facts of astronomy in the several scriptures of these peoples. The first measures are said to have been derived from the body of a man, " according to the simili- tude whereof God formed the world .... in such sort, that the one is called the greater world, and the other the lesser '* (Lomazzo on " Painting," p. 109). Therefore man having been made in the image both of God and the world, God, the world, and man are synonymous terms, and the human body becomes the standard measure of the world. According to Vitruvius a man*s height is four cubits := 6 feet = 24 palms ^ 96 digits. Now, taking the earth's distance from the sun at 10, the radius of the sphere of the zodiac becomes about 96, so that the number of digits in a man's height may have been supposed to measure the seven orbits of the planets, surrounded by the fixed stars. In that case, when Vitruvius lays it down that all temples are to be designed according to the pro- portions of the human body, he may mean that the temples were to conform to the measures of the universe. The astronomical science of the Hebrews seems to be mystically concealed under the figures of Noah's ark, the Tabernacle, the Temple of Solo- mon, and the Holy Oblation of Ezekiel, while the Christians added to these the mystical city of the New Jerusalem, described in the two last chapters of the Revelation. Each of these mystical struc- tures appears to exhibit a particular aspect of the heavens, and constitutes a scientific record of cer- 28 THE CANON. tain known facts of astronomy, which formed the true basis of the ancient theology. The cosmos of the Christians, according to late writers, but presumably derived from the tradition of the ancient church, consisted of three principal divisions: First, there were the three FIG. 2. — CONVENTIONAL PLAN OF THE UNIVERSE HAVING THE SEVEN ORBITS OF THE PLANETS INSTEAD OF THE SEVEN INTERVALS GENERALLY SHOWN ON THE OLD DIAGRAMS; circles of the empyreum ; secondly, the sphere of the fixed stars, together with the seven planets ; and, lastly, the sublunary, or elementary world. In Greek the names of the three divisions of the universe are empyreion, aither, and stoicheia, whose numerical values, as will be seen, correctly set forth the measures of the system for which they stand. This scheme appears in many of the illustrated works of the sixteenth and seven- teenth centuries, but the intervals between the orbits of the planets are never correctly drawn. To make a diagram accurately showing the relative distances of the seven planetary orbits, it will be found that the sun's diameter, the interval between the earth and the moon, called the Tone by Pliny, or the earth's diameter, are convenient units of measurement. All these units, as well as the British mile, appear to have been employed by the ancients. If the orbits of the planets are measured by the length of the sun's diameter, taken at 852,584 British miles, the distances are : Diam. of the sun. From the sun to 5 35-392,638 miles 44 ? 66,131,476 „ 77^ e 92,500,000 „ io8i S 139,312,226 „ 163J 1/^ 475.693.149 ., 558 h, 872,134,583 „ 1,023 According to the old Egyptian system, the earth stood in the centre, the sun was supposed to occupy the earth's orbit, while Mercury and Venus revolved round the sun as satellites. Even modern astronomers, with all their appliances, are uncer- tain as to the exact distance of the earth from the sun. It has been computed to be from 108 to 1 10 of its own diameters. Galileo called it no, and the ancients seem to have usually taken it at this amount. Origen ("Against Celsus," bk. vi., ch. 23), after describing the cosmic ladder of the Mithraic mysteries, and the harmonic arrangements of the stars, continues : " If one wished to obtain means for a profounder contemplation of the entrance of 30 THE CANON* souls into divine things .... let him peruse at the end of Ezekiels prophecies the visions .... and let him peruse also from the Apocalypse of John what is related of the city of God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and of its foundations and gates. And if he is capable of finding out also FIG. 3. — THE HOLY OBLATION. the road, which is indicated by symbols . . . ., let him read the book 'of Moses entitled * Numbers,' and let him seek the help of one who is capable of initiating him into the meaning of the narratives concerning the encampments of the Children of Israel. ... He will distinguish in the encamp- ments certain things relating to the numbers that are enumerated, and which are especially adapted to each tribe, of which the present does not appear to be the proper time to speak!' ^ The vision referred to at the end of EzekieFs prophecies is the mys- tical description of the land of Canaan (Ezekiel, ch. xlviii). The city of Jerusalem is there de- scribed as being surrounded by a four-square figure, called the Holy Oblation, which is said to be 25,000 reeds on every side. The suburbs of the city are enclosed by a square whose sides are 5,000 reeds, and the city in the middle measures 4,500 reeds on every side. Beyond the suburbs on the north and south a space of 25,000 x 10,000 reeds was allotted to the priests and Levites. Now, if the sides of the three squares be divided by 12 — the number of the tribes — (^5^°= .,o83i 5^ = 416I, and 4:500= 375), ^ 12 12 12 f it will be found that the city exactly contains the sun's orbit, together with the orbit of Venus, shown in the four quarters according to the Egyp- tian system, and probably represents the wheels of the four living creatures, seen in the first vision of Ezekiel. The orbit of Saturn, being about 2,046 diameters of the sun, is contained within the outer square, whose sides are 2,083^. The square sur- rounding the suburbs of the city has no direct affinity with the orbits of the planets, but a circle whose area is equal to this square has a circum- ference of 1,480. For various reasons it would seem that the measure 2,083^ is a mean between the numbers 2,093 ^^*^ 2,073. ,Let it therefore be taken for granted that the Holy Oblation is a square enclosed by two lines, which are repre- sented by the mean dimension 2,083^. The outer line, which measures 2,093, ^s the side of a square having an area double that, which has a side of ^ This last sentence is a very good specimen of Patristic equivocation. 32 THE CANON. 1,480. That is to say, a circle inscribed within the square 2,093 exactly contains a square whose sides are 1,480 ; and this circle will be assumed to be the sphere of the zodiac or firmament. The side of the inner square, again, measuring 2,073, is x^2"^h of the earth's circumference measured in miles. The numerical value of the name CHRisTOS is 1,480, and the mystery of this number appears to be that it supplies the measure of God's body extending crosswise throughout the whole universe. The wisdom of the number 666 conveys the same theological secret, for 666 is the diameter of a circle having a circumference of 2,093- The Greeks appear to have concealed a similar knowledge in the names of the planets, as recorded in the Epinomis of Plato, who calls the five planets XPONOi:, 1,090, ZET2, 612, 'APH2, 309, 'A^POAITH, 993, and *EPMH2, 353 ; if the sun, ^HAIOS, 318, and the moon, 2EAHNH, 301, be included, the sum of the numbers obtained from the seven names is 3,976, a number which is one less than the radius of a circle 25,000 in circumference. Now the side of the Holy Oblation, according to Ezekiel, is 25,000 reeds (^^^ = 2,083-! Y But a far more striking coincidence arises from the addition of the numbers deduced from the names 'EMnxPEION, 760, 'AI0HP, 128, and 2TOIXEIA, 1,196, for the sum of these amounts to 2,084, or the mean length of the side of the Holy Oblation. In the same way the geometrical figure called the New Jerusalem in the Apocalypse will be found to contain the sun's orbit and that of Mercury. Francis Potter, who published a book on ** the number 666 " in 1647, alludes to the mys- teires of this celestial city. He tell us, that the THE HOLY OBLATION. 33 144 cubits ascribed to the wall are to be taken as the area of its section — the wall being 1 2 cubits high and 12 cubits broad. The other measure- ment given is that in ch. xxi., v. 16 : ** And the city lieth four square, and the length is as large as the breadth ; and he measured the city with the reed 12,000 furlongs. The length, and the breadth, and the height of it are equal." Francis Potter explains, that the 12,000 furlongs (ardSia) are to be taken as the contents of a cube, but his calcu- lations as to its size are obscure. However 12,000 furlongs — 7, 9 20,000 feet (12, 000 x 660^:7,920,000), and the cube root of this number is about 199!^, or roughly 200, which gives the length of one side of the cube. The area of the city is therefore a square nearly 200 feet on every side, surrounded by a wall 12 cubits, or 18 feet wide, which increases the outside dimensions to 235-!- ^^^^' This figure appears to be a Christian variation of the Hebrew city of Ezekiel, and so it is interpreted by Francis Potter. For it will be found, that it incloses the sun's orbit together with that of Mercury, drawn in each of the four corners of the square. It is well known that the four beasts, which appear in the midst of the four wheels in Ezekiel's vision, are iden- tical with the four symbols of the Evangelists, and the devices upon the four standards of the Camp of the Israelites, where they stand for the four corner signs of the Zodiac — Taurus, Leo, Scorpio, and Aquarius. In a thirteenth century manuscript of the Apocalypse in the British Museum (MSS. Add. 18,633), there is a miniature of the city of the New Jerusalem, showing the three persons of the Trinity, in the midst of a square having the four symbols of the Evangelists depicted in the four corners, cor- responding to the four orbits of Mercury. This peculiar arrangement constantly recurs in early Christian art. Usually the Christ is surrounded D 34 THE CANON. by the Vesica, and it is a remarkable fact, that a Vesica, whose length is equal to that of the city in the preceding diagram, coincides with the four circles of Mercury's orbit, and consequently pro- duces a geometrical figure exactly resembling the common method of representing Christ in Glory. The circumferences of the two circles which form the Vesica being nearly 360, they may be taken to represent the two intersecting circles of the equator and the ecliptic. Some interpreters, according to Francis Potter, take the 12,000 furlongs to be the area of the city, and therefore he says, " that the FIG. 4. — THE NEW JERUSALEM. perimeter or compass of such an area must be 436 furlongs at the least," the side being about 109 furlongs. And since 109 is roughly the radius of the sun's orbit measured by the sun's diameter the New Jerusalem is doubly shadowed forth as a vision of the city of the Sun. In ch. xxi., v. 9, " that great city, the holy Jerusalem descending out of Heaven " is called " the Bride the Lamb's wife, and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal." The bride of the Cabala was called adni or thora, and it is evidently she whom St. John is describing under the figure of the heavenly city. The name Tarot has been THE HOLY OBLATION. 35 derived from the Hebrew word thora, the law; and it is a further confirmation of the cosmic import of this diagram that the hieroglyph of the twenty- second card of the Tarot-pack, called " Le Monde," represents the four symbols of the Evangelists surrounding a Vesica, inclosing the figure of a young virgin. Moreover the circle which surrounds the city has a circumference of 888, the numerical value of the name Jesus. Again, Francis Potter constantly connects the New Jerusalem with the number 666, and this may be explained by the fact that its diagonals measure (333 x 2 =) 666, and the cross thus formed symbolized what he calls the Antichrist. If the inferences just drawn from the numbers ascribed to the Holy Oblation and the New Jeru- salem be correct, it is obvious that these diagrams afford a positive evidence of the knowledge pos- sessed by the Hebrews and Christians concerning the magnitude and distances of the heavenly bodies. The position of these figures in the Canonical Scriptures also conclusively demonstrates a connection between theology and cosmic science. For while the extent of the ancient knowledge of astronomy has still to be proved, no one can rea- sonably doubt that the old theological systems were largely concerned with, if not actually founded upon, the order of the universe, which in its en- tirety supplies the only comprehensible manifesta- tion of the Deity evident to the senses of man- kind. In the statement of Origen, already quoted, he refers to the Camp, as well as the Holy Oblation, and hints that a similar interpretation applies to both. The description, of which he speaks, occurs in the second chapter of Numbers, where it is said that the Israelites pitched their camp round the Tabernacle. They were grouped in four 36 THE CANON. companies composed of three tribes, each under a standard. The standard of Judah was set at the east, that of Reuben at the south, that of Ephraim at the west, and that of Dan at the north. Judah's standard bore a Hon, Reuben's bore a mandrake, Ephraim's a bull, and Dan's a serpent. The total number of the whole army distributed under the standards was 603,550 (v. 32). Villalpanda ("In Ezek." vol. ii., p. 470) gives a diagram of the camp (reproduced by Kircher *' CEdip." tom. ii., pars i, p. 21, and Sir W. Drummond, " CEdipus Judaicus," plate 15) in the form of a square, with the signs of the zodiac arranged round it, three on every side. Each of the twelve tribes is identified with one of the signs, and the standards are allotted to the four tribes which occupy the corners of the square, whose corresponding signs are Leo, Aquarius, Taurus, and Scorpio. The four corner signs of the Zodiac were afterwards assigned as the symbols of the four evangelists, beginning with Aquarius (Matthew), Leo (Mark), Taurus (Luke), and Scorpio, changed to an eagle (John). Villalpanda's diagram con- tains, besides the Zodiac, the symbols of the seven planets and four elements, thus comprising the whole cosmic system which has been supposed to be included in the Holy Oblation. The arrange- ment of the squares in which the symbols are placed suggests that if the solution of the mystery is a geometrical one, it depends upon the problem ^of squaring the circle. For the old method of finding the diameter of a circle whose area was equal to a given square was to divide the diagonal of the square into ten parts, and to take eight for the diameter of the circle. The division of the camp in Villalpanda's diagram is into ten equal squares, the space between each of the squares bearing thp symbol of the Zodiac upon it, being a THE HOLY OBLATION. 37 double square. Therefore, a circle touching the inner angle of the four corner signs has an area equal to the area of the camp. Now, by dividing 603,550, the number of the Israelites, by 12, we get 50,295^, which is nearly equal to the length of the two diagonals of the square, whose area is ,.PCCi.P.SM.«,_ i \ r ZdUn & ^^1 "oSLfnS'ST " FIG. 5. THE CAMP OF THE ISRAELITES (VILLALPANDA, "IN EZEK. EXPLAN ATI ONES," 1 596, TOM. II., P. 470.) half of that of the Holy Oblation. The diagonal of this square being r^5_J-_z5 — j 25,147-^, and taking, as in the case of the Holy Oblation, ^^ of this number to be the length required, we get -^^—37—2,095^, or very nearly the diagonal of a 12 square whose sides are 1,480. The diagonal of such a square is about 2,093, which has been 38 THE CANON. suggested as the extreme measure of the Holy Oblation. Now a circle having an area equal to that of a square whose sides are 1,480, and whose diagonal is 2,093, has a diameter of 1,674 f^^^zr 209^x8 = 1,6741). And the square \ 10 / inclosing this circle has a diagonal of 2,368, which is the numerical equivalent of the name iesovs CHRiSTOS (888 + 1,480 =: 2,368). A simpler explanation is that the square root of 603,550 is 776^, and this number is the perimeter of the Holy Oblation if the sun's distance be taken at 10. If this be the true interpretation of the numbers, the representation of the camp given by Villal- panda exactly agrees with the result. For the square 1,480 being inscribed within the sphere of the Zodiac the arrangement of the signs as the border of the square appropriately notifies that fact, and the addition of the seven planets and the four elements makes the diagram a conventional picture of the three divisions of the universe which correspond to the three persons of the cabalistic triad symbolized by the numbers 2,368, 1,480, and 888. These are the three great canonical numbers of antiquity, and they are exemplified by the three mystical diagrams just described. The camp may be said to symbolize the number 2,368 (iesovs CHRiSTOs), the Holy Oblation may be referred to the number 1,480, christos, and the Heavenly City of the Bride, being inclosed in a circle 888 in circumference, may be accepted as the symbol of the number 888 (iesovs). Generally the third person of the Trinity represented the sublunary world or four elements only, but in the Pythagorean system she also personified the sun, whose orbit, as has been shown, is contained in her city de- scribed by St. John. CHAPTER III. THE CABALA. " The Jews, in imitation of the Pythagorean Institutes^ made the Cabala their codex or Canon Law.^^ — "Court of the Gen- tiles," vol. iii., p. 216. ^^The Church of Rome persisted obstinately in affirming, though ndt always with the same imprudence and plainness of speech, that the Holy Scriptures were not composed for the use of the multitude, but only for that of their spiritual teachers^ — Mos- HEiM, "Eccl. Hist.," vol. ii., sect, iii., ch. i., p. 25. In order that what follows may be better under- stood, we must now attempt to elucidate the principal doctrines of the Cabala. This singular work is known to have formed an important part of the Masonic traditions, and undoubtedly con- tains the nearest approach to a direct revelation of the ancient canonical secrets of the old world ; and however obscure it may be, those parts which are intelligible provide us with a few fundamental facts, which are indisputably the basis of the old esoteric philosophy. The books of the Cabala which have come down to us are said to have been first written by Simeon Ben Jochai at the time of the destruction of the second temple, and afterwards expanded by his disciples. Mr. Mathers, in the introduction to his translation of the " Zohar," tells us that the mysterious science of the Cabala was said to have been communicated by angels to Adam after his fall. From Adam it passed to Noah and the Patriarchs, ** Moses, who was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, 40 THE CANON, was first initiated into the Cabala in the land of his birth, but became most proficient in it during his wanderings in the wilderness, where he not only devoted to it the leisure hours of the whole forty years, but received lessons in it from one of the angels." Although statements of this kind are merely philosophic fictions, we may safely accept the antiquity of the Cabala as being very great. The legends of its origin are not made without a purpose, for underneath their ficti- tious terms a truth is concealed. For instance, the communication of the Cabala was said to be coeval with the Fall, because this event, allegoric- ally understood, symbolizes the transmission of the mystical doctrine as an emblem of the divine essence or life existing in the universe. The Cabala was the emblem of the soul of the world, and, as all human art was created in the imitation of nature, the secret tradition symbolized the in- visible soul, which inspired the letter of the Scrip- tures. And since it was a postulate of the philo- sophers, that the tradition or passage of the spirit or soul of God from heaven to earth was effected through the Zodiac and seven planets, so they alleged that the Cabala was transmitted through the mouths of the Patriarchs and the Messiah Christos, who personified the planetary system. According to the old cosmic arrangement, the universe consisted of three stages, the Empyreum, the seven planets, and the earth in the centre. This order we may call God, the Universe, and Man, and the cabalistic steps or degrees, embracing these three divisions, may be said to express the hypothetical agency through which the spirit flowed down to earth, and was first incarnated in the human body of the hypothetical creature, Adam. The cabalistic theology, representing the endless reasoning of countless generations of ingenious THE CABALA. 4 1 men, is the epitome of man's first efforts to grasp the problems connected with the cause and con- tinuance of life, the inscrutable mystery which has baffled the understanding of all inquirers alike. They reasoned concerning all the phenomena of existence by their analogy to human creation, and it was supposed that the universal creation took place after the manner of human creation, and that the generative attributes of a man and a woman were those of God and the universe, and finally that all the bodily functions of a human being had their counterpart in the macrocosm or greater world. The theoretical system based upon these ideas constituted the secret doctrine, which was taught orally, and was never written. All the old canonical writings are an exposition of its teach- ing, but these works are composed, so that only those persons, who are instructed in the rules of the hidden wisdom could discover their meaning. There was a mystical doctrine taught in all the old schools of philosophy. In the case of the Pytha- goreans, a long and severe period of probation was required on the part of an aspirant, before the ultimate truths of the system were communicated. Although the true interpretation of the Jewish law depends upon a knowledge of these cabalistic mysteries, it is possible, that not a single human being at the present day understands their mean- ing or application. Menasseh Ben Israel, a Jewish writer at the beginning of the seventeenth century, has recorded some valuable observations on this mystical science, and has given the thirteen rules for practical use in interpreting the myths of the prophets. He says, " God delivered to Moses the written law, and the commentary called the oral law ; the latter was to be retained mentally and to be transmitted by tradition ; it is therefore 42 THE CANON. termed * Cabala ' (received). Accordingly the two texts (Exodus, xxxiv. 27) are presumed to allude to the two laws, so denominated from one being an exposition of the other. . . . " AH the known languages of the world, except- ing the Hebrew only, owe their origin to human construction and art; but the Hebrew had the Lord for its author and framer, and is thence called the ' holy tongue,' as it proceeded from that consummate Wisdom, which is infinite ; each word in itself contains the profoundest mysteries, , . . for which reason R. Simeon Ben Jochai says in the * Zohar,* ' Woe to him who imagines that the Law only contains the superficial structure of its narration '....* and he, who supposes it has no soul comprised within its veiled mysteries, has no portion in the world to come/ * Its body only,' he continues, 'the ignorant enjoy, but sages, who are the gifted servants of the Sublime and Most High King, look to its soul as its superior portion, and others still more learned to the soul of that soul. . . .' *'The least instructed are those who .... occupy themselves in the endeavour to learn how things happen according to the literal record ; these are rewarded for their pious application (although they do not properly understand it) yet acquire salvation by virtue of their good intention. " Others employ themselves in studying the explanations of the precepts and ceremonies, that is, knowledge of the ' Mishna,' called by some the oral law, from having been formerly retained in the memory of sages, and conveyed verbally to their disciples. " And lastly, many aspire to the highest con- templation of the mysteries contained in the words, letters, points, and musical accents used in the con- struction of the text of the law. THE CABALA. 43 " R. Simeon Ben Jochai termed the first of these, Masters of the Reading; the second, Masters of the Second or Double Lecture; and the third. Masters of the Cabala, that is, of Tradition (or the Received), it being an explanation of the divine law, received from the mouth of God by Moses, revealed by him to the sages or elders, and by them handed down to posterity. . . . ' As Moses was a hundred and twenty days on the Mount, on three different occasions of forty days each, it is highly probably he learned them all during these three studies, dedicating forty days to each, and as all beginnings are the most difficult, he was gradually prepared, and rendered capable of attain- ing the highest contemplation of the Cabala, in the same period of forty days as he had employed in mastering the lesser ones, from being thus gradu- ally instructed. Hence it may be understood what " Cabala " is, and how it is divided into two parts. . . .' " A demonstration will now be attempted, for the information of the curious, as to the means employed by the ' Cabalists ' to discover the highest mysteries of the Law. , . , They have thirteen methods of discovering the mystery they attribute to the whole Law in a logical sense, and the secret meaning of its words. Brief examples of these rules will clearly explain their nature. . , . " The second rule is called Transposition, that is, the letters of a word being transposed, and joined different ways, form various words. . . . This rule also seems to be derived from scripture, as it says in Genesis, * Noah found grace in the sight of the Lord/ The letters in the name NCh, Noah, being transposed, form ChN, grace.'* By this change the numerical value of the word be- comes 708, instead of 58. . . . " The third rule is called Gematria or Numera- 44 THE CANON. tion, and is performed by numbers, being a mathe- matical mode of comprehending the Scripture, for as the Hebrew letters are numerals they contain everything, Pythagoras said, God created the world by numbers, as did Plato (See Question 71); so the word erashith amounts numerically to the same as itsr bthvrh (He formed the Law), thus drawing the conclusion, that the Law was the instrumental cause of the creation of the world. To this question, Why does the Law begin with a B ? They answer, To signify the two Laws — the written and oral, or justice and mercy, and similar things. This rule is used in different modes, as explained in ' Pardes Ria- monim' ; they often add a unit to the amount of the letters in a word, which is called Colel, as to the word (Covenant) numerically 612, they add this Colel making it 613, saying, this word signi- fies the Law, which contains 613 precepts. This mystery of numbers also appears stated in Holy Writ ; for in the case of the idolatrous priests of Baal, who accepted Elijah's challenge, it says, that Elijah took 12 stones, according to the number of the sons of Jacob; his taking this number, for the special purpose of invoking the Lord, was not merely that 12 was the number of Israel's sons, but because those sons were 12 in conse- quence of that special number In Scripture cover- ing a profound mystery. The Talmudists also use this rule in various passages in the Talmud, and modern authors much more so ; as R. Solomon Molcho, R. Jacob ben Habib, R. Mordecai, R. Sabatai and others deducing great mysteries there- from." ^ — " Conciliator," vol. i., p. 206. The Christian equivalent to the word Cabala ^ These statements are corroborated by Diodorus, who says, " the Chaldeans preserve their learning within themselves by a continued tradition from father to son." THE CABALA. 45 was Gnosis, knowledge, and from innumerable refer- ences in the writings of the Fathers, it is evident that the new sect, in the construction of the Gospel and ritual of the Church, perpetuated the same mystical tradition which they had received from the Hebrews. The nature of the Knowledge is explicitly stated by Clement of Alexandria, in the following words : "And the GNOSIS itself is that which has descended by transmission to a few, having been imparted unwritten by the Apostles" ("Miscell." bk. vi., ch. 7). St. Basil also alludes to it thus : " They [the Fathers] were well instructed to preserve the veneration of the mysteries by silence. For how could it be proper, publicly to proclaim in writing the doctrine of those things, which no unbaptized person may so much as look upon ?" — *' De Spiritu Sancto/' c. 27. From expressions of this kind it becomes apparent that the importance, attached to the unbroken continuity of the Apostolic succession, was due to the necessity for securing the transmission of the oral Tradition or Gnosis unimpaired, in order that the true interpretation of the Gospel might be insured to succeeding generations. The works of Irenseus, Hippolytus, and Epiphanius have numerous references to the Gnostic practices of the Christians, and particularly to the Cabalistic process of Gematria. The fact, that the numerical system of the Cabalists and Gnostics is generally condemned by the Fathers, appears to be no more than a priestly artifice, intended to deceive the vulgar, and prevent inquisitive people from prying too deeply into the mysteries, which were retained as the exclusive property of the few, referred to by St. Clement. That the Greek philosophy rested upon the same secret tradition, which was accepted and retained as the basis of the Christian theology, in common with other religious and philosophical 46 THE CANON. systems, seems to be borne out by another pass- age from the " Miscellanies" : " Peter says in his * Preaching/ Know that there is one God, . . . who made all things by the * Word of His power,' that is, according to the Gnostic Scripture, His Son. Then he adds : ' Worship this God, not as the Greeks ' — signifying plainly, that the excellent among the Greeks worshipped the same God as we, but that they had not learned by perfect know- ledge that which was delivered by the Son. ' Do not then worship,* he did not say the God whom the Greeks worship, but * as the Greeks ' — chang- ing the manner of the worship of God, not an- nouncing ANOTHER GOD. . . . Neither worship as the Jews; for they, thinking that they only know God, do not know Him, adoring as they do angels and archangels, the month, and the moon. . . . For what belonged to the Greeks and the Jews is old. But we, who worship him in a new way, IN THE THIRD FORM, are Christians" (" Mis- cell." vi., ch. 5). Theophilus Gale, one of the most learned Puritans of the seventeenth century, says, that "The Jews, in imitation of the Pythagorean In- stitutes, made the Cabala their codex or Canon- Law" ("Court of the Gentiles," vol. iii., p. 216) ; and again on page 217, he repeats, "As for the Jewish Cabala or Cabalistic mythologie it seems to me exactly framed in imitation of the Grecian Mythology and symbolic mode of philosophizing. It's true the Jewish Church had even from its first institution, its choicest mysteries delivered in Symbols, Parables, Enigmes, and other terrene shadows." He speaks further of the Jewish Tal- mud or system of traditions, called the oral Law, which, he says, the Jews " equalize unto, yea prefer before the Scriptures. For they say (just as the Papists of their Traditions^ ' that we cannot arrive THE CABALA. 47 at a perfect explication of the Divine precepts, but by the traditions of the ancients ; again, that without the oral Law, the whole written Law is wrapped up in darknesse.' " This is corroborated by Lightfoot, probably the most competent Rab- binical scholar of the English Church, who declares, " Thatthe Jews venerate the oral Law as the founda- tion of the written Law, and scruple not to say, 'the words of the Elders are weightier than the words of the Prophets. ' " The Jews were not the only people who possessed a mystical tradition, for the Neo- Platonists of the Alexandrian School claimed to have had a "sacred succession," by which the inner doctrines of the school were received and perpetuated. The Christians also had their Gnosis, said to have been received from Christ, by whom it was transmitted to the Apostles, and successively to the heads of the churches.^ It is explicitly stated ^ St. Clement declared that the barbarian Scriptures were all symbolical, and to be understood required " an interpreter and guide. For they considered that, receiving truth from those who knew it well, we should be more earnest and less liable to deception ; " and speaking of his own tenets, he says (bk. v., ch. X.), "Rightly, therefore, the divine Apostle says, * By reve- lation the mystery was made known to me,' for without a guide or interpreter to reveal the meaning of the Scriptures, the mysteries are hidden and dark," Such a revelation was given by St. John, only his " Revelation " is as obscure as the Parable which it is supposed to lay bare. A plain explanation of the Gospel was handed down by oral tradition only, as St, Clement intimates, for "fear of the swinish and untrained hearers." " Even now I fear, as it is said, ' to cast pearls before swine, lest they tread them under foot, and turn and rend us ! ' . . . . For scarcely could anything which they would hear be more ludicrous than those to the multitude." ("Miscell.," bk. i., ch. i.) Thus without disguise he gives the reason why " the mysteries of faith are not to be divulged to all." All old philo- sophers and priests, Christian or otherwise, had the same dread of the vulgar and profane, and had the same motive for con- cealing their mystical doctrine from the people, namely, lest it should be turned into ribaldry. 48 THE CANON. by Mosheim (*' Ecc. Hist.," ii., p. 57) that "the religion of Rome .... is derived, according to the unanimous accounts of its doctors, from two sources, the written Word of God and the UN- WRITTEN ; or, in other words, from scripture and tradition." By the ApostoHc succession the true elucidation of the mysterious wisdom of the Gospel was secured, and presumably is still re- tained in the unreformed churches. After the Reformation the Protestants discarded the original traditions of the Church, and eventually ceased to regard the Papal authority, received uninter- ruptedly from St. Peter, as being of paramount importance. Thus the teaching of the traditions having been dropped, the veneration of the Pope, as the representative of the Apostolic succession, gradually lapsed, and the traditional knowledge intrusted to him has ceased to be known. Whether any part of the Gnosis, alluded to by St. Clement, is still received and transmitted by the modern Popes cannot be easily discovered, but judging from the Papal nervousness at present exhibited towards Freemasonry, it may be surmised thai some faint remnant of the ancient knowledge is even now in the keeping of the Vicar ol Christ.' As the practice of Gematria, defined by Menassel ben Israel, will be constantly used throughout the present work, the following instances will explair the method of its application in the works of th( philosophers. In Hebrew the word thora, th( law, and Adonai, the bride, whose name wai generally used as a substitute for the tetragam-. maton, or ihvh, have each the numerical valu( ^ The reason why his holiness has declared the ordination of the reformed Church of England to be invalid, is presumabl because the Protestants, when they broke with the Churct declined to acknowledge or teach the unwritten word. THE CABALA. 49 of 671, therefore, by the rule of Gematria, they have the same signification. In Greek IIAPA- AEI202 (Paradeisos) has the same numerical value, and is equivalent by Gematria to O K02M02, 670 + I = 671 ; and KOSMOS being numerically equal to 600, implies the number 1,040, which is the radius of the sphere of the Zodiac contained within the Holy Oblation for a vesica 600 broad is 1,040 long. MAKPO-KOSMOS, 831, was the name given to the Father, or the first three steps forming the upper triad of the Cabala. These three steps form a triangle at the crown of the diagram. And IITPAMIS, a pyramid or tri- angle, has also the value of 831. By Gematria these two words are equivalent to OAAAOS (Phallos), 831, and according to the proportion of the figure of Cesarino, 831 multiplied by 9^ gives the height of a man, stretched crosswise in a square enclosing a circle 7,899 in diameter, or the length of the polar diameter of the earth measured by British miles. Again *H rNXlSIZ (the Gnosis), 1,271, and 2TATPOE, a cross, have each the same numerical value ; therefore the Gnosis of the Christians may be said to be the knowledge of the cross. TEAETAI, 651, one of the names applied to the Greek mysteries, yields the same number as *Eni2THMH, science, and 651 is the diameter of a circle 2,046 in circumference, and 2,046 is the diameter of Saturn's orbit, measured by the diameter of the sun. Therefore both the mystic rites, and science of the Greek religion signified the knowledge of the cosmos. And 'EKKAH2IA, the Church, who was called the Spouse of Christ, is equivalent numerically to 'POAON, a rose, the emblem of the Rosicrucians, and was regarded by them as the antithesis of the Cross. The doctrine of the Cabala was reduced to a geometrical diagram, in which the ten steps were E 50 THE CANON. grouped according to a progressive scheme, so that the emanations of the Spirit of the Elohim issues from the first step called the Crown, and after passing through the whole figure is carried through the ninth step, and finally reaches the tenth or last of the series. The theory of the Cabala teaches that these ten steps symbolize a trinity of persons, whose function consists in re- ceiving and transmitting the spirit of life in its passage from heaven to earth. The first three steps shadow forth the first person of the trinity, called " Long face," the Macrocosm, or the Father. The next six steps are assigned to " Small face," who is called the Microcosm, the King or Son, the second person of the trinity. The tenth and last step is personated by the third person, called Mal- chuth, the Bride or Mother. Each of these ten symbols is associated with one of the heavenly bodies, so that the whole diagram is an epitome and image of the universe. The ideas which the ancients connected with these three persons, combined into this figure of ten progessive steps, appear to form the basis of all their philosophy, religion, and art, and in it we have the nearest approach to a direct revelation of the traditional science, or Gnosis, which was never communicated except by myths and symbols. A very little knowledge is required to recognize the identity of the cabalistic doctrine with that of the Gospel, for the Christian Trinity is clearly derived from the geometrical disposition of the ten steps, Kircher ("CEdipus," tom. ii., pars i, p. 289) has given one of the most complete illustrations of the diagram which is now available. And it is specially valuable from the fact that he has placed the symbols of the temple in its various parts, so that he makes the temple synonymous with the universe, and identifies its furniture with the three 6l*iO V^ HORIZON fc Swmma Cyrano, xris .5Y5TEMA XDIVINO 6 SEPHIROTIcyMi rvmnominVm Sephira. II FIG. 6. — THE CABALISTIC DIAGRAM FROM KIRCHER's " CEDIPUS.' 52 THE CANON. symbolical persons. The first three steps are attributed to the Empyreum, while the seven planets are comprised in those which are below ; the tenth step being assigned to the moon and the sublunary world. It is thus apparent that the Father represents the super-celestial region, the Son the intermediate space occupied by the seven planets, while the Bride or Mother is relegated to the four elements, which have the earth as their centre. Consequently we see in the scheme of the Hebrew philosophy, that the Deity — in whose image man's twofold body was formed — the temple, and the cosmos are one and synonymous. Although the only direct version of the Cabala which we possess is that of the Jews, it is abso- lutely certain that a similar oral tradition founded upon the same doctrine was current among the Greeks. All the early Christians, who knew their Cabala, declared that Plato had borrowed his ideas from Moses. Nor was Plato ignorant of that mystical symbol, the cross, which was a sacred emblem long before it emerged from obscurity in the first century. The allusion to the cross, in the famous passage in the "Timseus," has often been commented upon, and there can be no doubt that it prefigures the Mythos, which afterwards ap- peared in the Christian Gospel. It is quite plain that Plato, in describing the Demiurge or Logos, compounded out of the Zodiac, all the planets, and the elements, is referring to the second and third persons of the cabalistic triad, whose bodies com- prise the material universe, and who were created in the image of the Elohim, male and female. This Androgynous being the creator, "divided lengthwise into two parts, which he joined to one another at the centre like the letter X,^ and bent ^ The letter Chi has the value of 600 as a numeral, so that it is the numerical equivalent to the word cosmos, and a vesica THE CABALA. 53 them into a circular form, connecting them with themselves and each other at the point opposite their original meeting point" The two limbs of the cross symbolize the double sex of this ''heavenly creature/' whom we find in the Apoca- lypse standing amidst the seven candlesticks or planets, or as the image of Daniel, and again as FIG. 7. — THE MACROCOSM. FROM THE FRONTISPIECE TO ROBERT FLUDD'S " UTRIUSQUE COSMI MAJORIS ET MINORIS HIS- TORIA." 1617. the Man in Ezekiers vision, and, above all, as CHRiSTOS extended crosswise in the Holy Obla- tion. This was the cross which Constantine saw in the sky, and his conversation meant that he was enlightened and instructed in the Christian Gnosis, and saw with his spiritual eye the crucified 600 wide is 1,040 long, or the radius of the circle 2,080 in dia- meter which is contained in the Holy Oblation. 54 THE CANON. man stretched across the heavens, and believed in the verity of the visionary Christ. The architect Cesariano, who edited an Italian KsBW :. ■ ■ ^... ._™.™-^^^=3L-._^l3^l?j| X^ m'^ ■^'■■"^'"■^ iiim lintt^jfA^^^il^llQ^lppnH ii^iiiililMliii T ^^^3X^ — j [?3 T ^ ■ N. ^m klt^^rL -L^^M-U^L, ' M ^ ■ 1 / [\ : :p.^\.„,.x-;.i.^^y[«uL:4aa..:-L 1 A m " U-i WOn^^fe ^^44r III ;^«M^«u..^=j»-'s|^^ ^^^^FTvj^'^-f^ "^^1 1 1 r"7*-r • :f !l»H:^±t I --' 1 I !-\ .jjirss^ ' / ./ > ' \ jmiWR k ■ vi^ii zf: • ~^lKiMi M 1 1« M t/ lii / 1 ! k tS' ^ fe ^ i:^ ^ i pml r . ^ ■ s IL \ pjf /. !■ S~ - / n 3""3S .,^ /» 1 j 11 i \ " / N .■ ' 1 / \ / SS S 3 T'\ ■ ■,--^ /^ IS i-f 1 \ / . ''^fi% ■ 3" "x ^ '/ 1 ^ / ? fi fe ■'--'■ ' -rrt *% K V 1 K B ^ "' / \ ■ . t' I / ^ fe--^' Lii-" ' . i / \ B *! -J- ■ bi' ■. ' ,■ >< ^ 1 1 i ■*^ \ C ■ '^ \ . /; tf* \ i« / V ^ - H K t '^ \ ■ ■■• / . \ kU i-/j / N / ^ ^7 fill ria \ \ fef s '/M ri,« \/r k . \ 4 r / cvBiri^ fflBnl^i {III nan ^N^ ^[ffl ■ ' ^ II III 1 ra»f m^.*!; II 1 ^ £ ^ ^ ^ tsi^ -«^ r***T ''■'*r"'''f'"T ■ ' 1 FIG, 8. — THE MACROCOSM. FROM CESARIANO'S EDITION OF "VITRUVIUS" (COMO, 1521), FOLIO XLIX. translation of Vitruvius published in 152 1, has drawn the two figures, intended by Vitruvius to embody the proportions of temples, with an anato- mical exactness not to be found elsewhere. The first glance at these two figures shows us, that THE CABALA. 55 they are each disposed in the form of a cross.^ The man whose body forms the Jerusalem cross is relatively bigger than the other, whose limbs, de- scribe the St. Andrew s cross or saltire, their pro- portions being so arranged as to exemplify the FIG. 9, — THE MICROCOSM. FROM ROBERT FLUDD'S " HISTORIA MICROSMI," P. 113. duplication of the square. The square inclosing the greater man is divided horizontally and vertic- ^ Cornelius Agrippa ("Occulta Philosophia," Parisiis, 1567, p. 237) has depicted the figure of the Microcosm standing within a circle, on a quadrangular stone, with his arms stretched out to the circumference. In each hand is placed a five- pointed star, the emblem of the firmament. On page 238 he has represented the Macrocosm in a square like the figure of Cesariano. Four symbols are drawn opposite the four extremi- 56 THE CANON. ally into thirty parts, thus dividing the area into 900 small squares. His height being 96 digits, the perimeter of the square is 384 digits — the number of the soul of the world according to Plutarch — and if he were were drawn within the Holy Oblation, then his body would extend through the seven orbits of the planets to the sphere of the Zodiac or fixed stars, and exactly resemble the figures of the Macrocosm, which appear in the works of the mystic philosophers of the seventeenth century. The figure of the lesser man would occupy the square, whose area is half that of the Holy Oblation.^ Now the Microcosm whose body is disposed saltire-wise, like the letter X, exactly agrees with the description of Plato*s Logos, whom the early Fathers considered to be identical with their Christos. And when the Microcosm or Logos is stretched crosswise in a circle, drawn within the Holy Oblation, the sides of the square surrounding his body measure 1,480 diameters of the sun, and the name Christos is numerically equal to 1,480. On reading the trea- tise of Francis Potter on the number 666, it is obvious that the interpretation given is founded ties of the body — an eye above his head, at his right hand a serpent, at his left a staff, and shield at his feet. There is another figure of the Microcosm exactly resembling the lesser man of Cesariano (p. 240). The square inclosing his body is surrounded by the twelve signs of the zodiac. There are also two other figures (pp. 239, 241), each drawn within a circle having one of the seven planets corresponding to some member of their bodies. ^ The duplication of the square illustrated by the relative sizes of these two figures is minutely explained by Plato in the " Meno." par. 82 (Jowett's translation, p. 43). The old Masonic writers declare that the true system of the universe, and the foundation of all geometrical proportion is to be found in the forty-seventh proposition of Euclid, as expounded by Pytha- goras, and communicated in writing by Plato, because, apparently, the ratio which those two figures bear to one another is calcu- lated by it. THE CABALA, 57 upon some knowledge of the true meaning of the number, which it was not the intention of the author to reveal. For the " explanations " are very often mere verbal quibblings, which mean little or nothing. However, he occasionally commits him- self to a direct statement, as when he says — follow- ing the interpretations of Rupertius and P. Bongus (*' De Numerorum Mysteriis ") — ** that the number 666 is not only the number of the Beast's name, but also the number of Gody that is, it is a number which God hath pleased to name and reveal to men, that by counting of this number, they might find out that other numbery which it pleased not God ex- pressly to name in this place, but rather mystically to conceal, etc." (p. 60). From this we learn that '* by counting" the number 666 we may discover the number of God. The term " counting " might very properly be used here to describe the process of finding the circumference of a circle 666 in diameter, that is, 2,093 — ^he diagonal of a square whose sides are 1,480, the numerical equivalent of Christos, the name of God. Francis Potter does not count the number in this way. He extracts the square root of 666 which he computes at 25!^, or 25-Uj or 25j^^, remarking, that "however the number of the frac- tions be variable, yet the number 25 is always con- stant and the same." The fractions curiously in- troduced may possibly give us an indication of the methods of those cryptic writers. For 41 multi- plied by 51 produces 2,091, a number which is only one and a fraction less than the side of the Holy Oblation containing the square 1,480, the numerical equivalent of Christos. The next fraction is -ff , and the product of the two numbers is 775, or the perimeter of the Holy Oblation, taking the Sun's distance at 10. It is, in fact, another way of ex- pressing the number 2,093. The third fraction is 58 THE CANON, apparently the true one : but the square root of 666 is more nearly 25*807 than 25-806. The two figures include three persons, for the Microcosm or lesser man represents the double sexed creature, whose bride, or the feminine half of his body, is fixed to his back. According to the Cabala, they were not always conjoined in this way, but were sometimes separated. In Cesarianos figure only the masculine half is visible. In the case of the temples, it is difficult to see how these figures of Cesariano's could have been used, unless they were associated with specific measures ; therefore we may conclude that they formed the canon or rule of measurement in archi- tecture. Any measure of the universe could be identified with their bodies and applied to a temple, and it would thus become possible to canonize a certain number of figures which for convenience and use could be recognized, as the sanctioned patterns for the practice of the architectural arts. Originally the builders must have been instructed by the priests, and the rule of Vitruvius could only have resulted from a theological system based upon cosmic science. An illustration by Cataneo the architect (" Architectura," p. 37), who wrote in 1554, gives the plan of a Christian church disposed crosswise according to the figure of the Macro- cosm, or, as he calls him, Jesus Christ. What Hippolytus (" Refutation," bk. v.) tells us of the doctrines of the Nasseni seems to show that their creed was derived from the Cabala, and is a valuable illustration of its meaning. The Nasseni were a sect of Christian Gnostics, who worshipped the Logos under the name and image of the Ser- pent. They appear to have been of Hebrew origin, for they took their name from the Hebrew word nachash^ a serpent.^ " These Nasseni magnify,as the ^ "For the serpent is called naas [in Hebrew]". The THE CABALA. 59 originating cause of all things else, a Man, and a Son of man. And this Man is a hermaphrodite, and is called among them Adam" (p. 127) : and a hymn addressed to him begins thus : '* From thee [comes] Father, and through thee [comes] Mother " . . . . " And they say of this Man, that one part FIG. 10. — THE PLAN OF A CHRISTIAN CHURCH DISPOSED ACCORD- ING TO THE FIGURE OF VITRUVIUS. CATANEO, P. 37. is rational, another psychical, another earthly. And they suppose that the knowledge of him is the beginning of the knowledge of God. And the Samothracians worship that Adam as the primal man, and in their temples '* there stand two images of naked men having both hands stretched aloft towards heaven, and their pudenda turned up- numerical value of NChSh (serpent) is 358; it is therefore equivalent by Gematria to MShICh, Messiah. 6o THE CANON. wards, as the statue of Mercury on Mount Cyllene " (p. 140). "And the Nasseni affirm concerning the spirit of the seed that it is the cause of all existing things and is the secret and unknown mystery of the universe concealed and revealed among the Egyptians, who, after the Phrygians, are of greater antiquity than all mankind, and who con- fessedly were the first to proclaim to all the rest of men the rites and orgies of all the gods as well as the unspeakable mysteries of Isis." These, how- ever, are nothing but the pudendum of Osiris. " And the Greeks deriving this mystery from the Egyptians preserve it unto this day. For we be- hold the statues of Mercury of such a figure honoured among them. For Mercury is Logos who, being at once the interpreter and fabricator of the things that have been, that are, and will be, stands fashioned into some such figure as the pudendum of a man having an impulsive power from the parts below towards those above. And a Mercury of this description is a conjuror of the dead and a guide of departed spirits and an originator of souls. This is the Christ who in all who have been generated is the portrayed Son of Man from the unportrayable Logos, This is the gi^eat unspeakable mystery of the Eleusinian rites HYE CYE!' ^ (The above quotation is given in the words of Hippolytus, but it is condensed, and is not quite consecutive.) From the foregoing quotation it is plain, that the Logos or soul of the world, according to Plato, the Greek Hermes, and the Christ, according to the Christian Gnostics, are all one and the same as the Hebrew Adam Kadmon, who is the second person of the cabalistic triad. The Cyllenian Hermes, described by Hippolytus, so exactly resembles the ^ The numerical value of 'TE KTE is 830, or one less than that of ^aXXoe. THE CABALA. 01 lesser man found in Cesariano's edition of Vitruvius, that they may be justifiably considered to be iden- tical. According to the masonic traditions the initiated architects, who preceded the Collegia Fabrorum of the Romans, and the Freemasons of the Middle Ages, were called Dionysiac architects. They were said to have been instructed in the rites and mysteries of Dionysus, and to have con- structed the temples according to the secrets thus imparted to them. And it is a remarkable veri- fication of this tradition, that the lesser man of Cesariano is depicted with vine leaves in his hair and an upright phallus, both well known attributes of Dionysus. No one can look at these two figures of Cesariano without seeing that they are something more than mere anatomical patterns. In later editions they become so, but here we have clearly and distinctly a curious survival of the cosmic deity of Greece, copied and disfigured by the crude draughtsmen of the Middle Ages, but faithfully preserved, and recognizable to the last. There is still a further means of connecting the figure of Vitruvius with the Christ, and the Micro- cosm. From a passage in the Cabala we learn the following very curious fact as to the body of the King : " Longitudo autem membri hujus 248mund- orum." Now this is the only measurement of the body of the Microcosm recorded in the Cabala, so that it is of the highest importance as a means of identification. The fact that the measurement is given in ** worlds " is also remarkable. By the proportions of Cesariano's figure, we can find the height of the whole body by multiplying 248 by g^. But by adding coiel or unity to 248 we get 249. And 249 and a fraction multiplied by 9^ gives 2,368, the numerical value of the name Jesus Christ. In the " Book of Concealed Mystery" (p. 46) the 62 THE CANON. following interpretation of the first verse of Genesis occurs. *' In the beginning the Elohim created the substance of the heavens, and the substance of the earth (the sense is : six members were created, which are the six numerations of Microprosopus-— viz., Benignity, as his right arm : Severity y as his FIG. II. — THE MICROCOSM. FROM CESARIANO'S EDITION OF "VITRUVIUS," FOLIO L. left arm : Beauty as his body : Victory, as his right leg : Glory, as his left leg : and the Fotmda- tion, as reproductive)." For instead of " in the beginning," it may be read " He created the six." Upon these depend all things, which are below (principally the Queen)." From this it is plain, that the heavens and the earth are here supposed THE CABALA. 03 to take the form of man, and it is no wonder that the Christian mystics of the Middle Ages saw in the " Timaeus " of Plato the same doctrine of creation, which they found in the Mosaic Law. Jowett, in his introduction to the " Timseus," says, " The Neo- Platonists, believing that Plato was inspired by the Holy Ghost and had received his wisdom from Moses, seem to find in his writings the Christian Trinity, the Word, the Church, and the Creation of the World in a Jewish sense." The Microcosm seems to have been used as a pattern in the practice of all the arts, Geofroy Tory introduces it in some of the letters of the " Champ Fleury," 1529, and Silvanus Morgan, the heraldic painter, shows it on a shield intended to symbolize the charges of the sixth day of creation. It stands on the shield as the image of Mercury, z.e.j Adam, He is surrounded by a lion, a hart, a horse, and a dragon, apparently corresponding to the four cosmic beasts of the Gospels (" Armi- logia," 1666, p. 188). Geometrically, the diagram containing the ten steps of the Cabala is shown by Kircher and other authorities in the form ascribed by Freemasons to what they call the " Double Cube," that is to say, an irregular hexagon, which will exactly enclose a Vesica. Consequently its length and breadth are of the proportion of 26 to 15. It is said that the ten cabalistic steps, in their entirety, symbolize the aspect of the Deity expressed by the four mystic letters ihvh, whose numerical value is 26. This number was said by the Jews to comprise the most sacred mysteries of the Law. No explana- tion, however, has ever been given showing how the number 26 afforded a key to all the science of the Israelites. It is now suggested that the Vesica, whose proportion is in the ratio of 26 to 15, was the symbol of the hidden rule or canon, 64 THE CANON. by which the synthesis of nature was reduced to a comprehensible figure, capable of demonstrating to initiates the truth and knowledge which con- stituted the secret wisdom of antiquity. Bryant, quoting from Eusebius, refers to a very singular fish, which, described in the language of hyperbole, is probably no other than the Vesica piscis. Eusebius copied his account of it from Berosus, a priest of Belus, and a native of Baby- lonia, who lived in the time of Alexander the Great. After declaring that writings were preserved at Babylon containing " a history of the heavens and FIG. 12. — DOUBLE CUBE. the sea " for fifteen myriads of years, he says, that in those ancient times the ChaldBeans lived without rule and order y when "there made its appearance from a part of the Eruthrean sea, which bordered upon Babylonia, an animal endowed with reason, who was called Cannes. According to the accounts of Apollodorus the whole body of the animal was like that of a fish ; and had under a fish's head another head, and also feet below, similar to those of a man, subjoined to the fish's tail. His voice, too, and language was articulate and human ; and there was a representation of him to be seen in the time of Berosos. This Being, in the day-time, used to converse with men ; but took no food at that iv'X X XJ^ & a^x i ■ season ; and he gave them an insight into letters and science, and every kind of art He taught them to construct houses, to found temples, to compile laws, and explained to them the principles of geometrical knowledge. He made them dis- tinguish the seeds of the earth. . . . When the sun set it was the custom of this Being to plunge again into the sea, and abide all the night in the deep." (Bryant, *' Myth," vol, iv., p. 129). Apollodorus called this animal Mva-ocpog, i,oii. Now the two vesicas whose perimeters are respectively 671 and 676 are each formed by the intersection of two circles, 1,006^ and 1,014 in circumference, there- fore I, on would be a mean between the last two numbers. And the diameter of a circle whose circumference is 1,011, is 32i|, or the numerical equivalent of KAAOS, beautiful, and NA02, a Temple. A vesica formed of two such circles measures about 482 across. And 482 is the numerical equi- valent of the name of 'POMBOS, and if two inter- secting circles, 1,011 in circumference, be inclosed in a greater vesica, the latter will be inclosed in a square contained within the orbit of Saturn, Moreover, the English word Truth has the value of 1,01 1, and 'fiANNHS, 1,109, ^^ i less than the nu- merical equivalent of MiKPonposonox, 1,101, the second person of the cabalistic triad. Finally, the names of the three persons of the Hebrew Cabala, Macroprosopos, 1,101, Microprosopos, 1,110, and Malchuth, 496, yield the number 2,707, which is the perimeter of a rhombus whose sides are 676, the square of 26, the length of the Vesica, and the numerical equivalent of the unspeakable name of God, IHVH.* ^ The following statement of Plutarch may be compared with this of Eusebius. " Anaximander concludes that men were first generated in the bellies oi fishes^ and being there nourished F 66 THE CANON. Another fish remarkable in antiquity is the whale which swallowed Jonah, It is called to h?to?,^ (370 X 598 =) 968, and if two circles 968 in diameter are formed into a vesica, their circum- ferences are equal to the two diagonals of a square whose sides are 2,151 ; and 597 is the circumfer- ence of Saturn's orbit if the sun s distance be taken at 10. The Rabbis pretended that the mystery of the name ihvh (translated Jehovah in the English version of the Scriptures) lay in its proper pro- nunciation, and no pious Jew ever attempts to utter it, the High Priest alone being privileged to pronounce it once a year, in the Holy of Holies of the temple. Much philosophy may be extracted from the combination of these four Hebrew letters, which need not be discussed here, but it may be mentioned that the numerical values of the two Greek names of the Deity, ZETS,^ 612 and *AnOAAXlN,^ T,o6i, bear the proportion of 26 : 15 to each other, and the numbers, produced from the two spellings of the name Dionysos are in the same ratio to one another. It is also probable that this ratio was used as a means of expressing one number by another. For example, the word nOAIE, a city, used as the name of the Bride in the Apocalypse, has the value of 390, and a vesica 390 broad is 676 long, and 676 is the square of 26, therefore the Greek word for a city may be taken to be equivalent to 26 ihvh, the Tetragammaton. Again, the name iesous yields 888, a number which is the length of a rhombus having a peri- meter of 2,048, the diameter of Saturn's orbit. And the number of the Hebrew name Messiah, till they grew strong, and were able to shift for themselves, they were afterwards cast out upon the dry land." — Cudworth's "Intellectual System of the Universe," vol. i., p. 189. ^ Matthew, xii. 40. ^ Zeus. ^ Apollo. 358, is the width of a vesica 620 long, and 620 is the value of K ether, the first step of the Cabala. And 666 is the length of a vesica, whose width is 384, or the sun's radius measured by the tone. If the Greek numerals from one to ten be arranged so as to correspond to the cabalistic steps and their numerical values computed, we find that 'EI2, 215, ATO, 474, TPEI2, 6 1 5, yield 1,304, which is one less than the length of a vesica which will contain a circle having a circumference of 2,368, and this triad represents the three steps of the Macrocosm. The next six numerals are TETPAE, 906, nENTE, 440,'EH,65,'EnTA, 386, 'OKTIl, 1,100, and'ENNEA, III — the sum of the numbers being 3,098 — and if this be taken as the perimeter of a cubical stone, or hexagon, the perimeter of its upper face would be 2,065, ^h^ mean number between 2,083, the side of the Holy Oblation, and 2,046, the diameter of Saturn s orbit ; it is consequently an appropriate number for the Microcosm who personates the Zodiac and seven planets. AEKA, the tenth numeral, has the value of 30, and this number denoting the distance from the earth to the moon, measured by the earth's dia- meter, symbolizes the sublunary world — the cosmic counterpart of the Bride. Again, if the numbers of the second and third persons of the Triad be added together, their sum is 3,128, which is the width of two circles 2,083 i^i diameter, formed into a vesica. And thus are represented the two circles of the ecliptic, and the equator on a celestial sphere. CHAPTER IV. noah's ark. ^^ After they had all entered into the Ark, if any one had beheld the entire collection, he would not have been wrong if he had said that it was a representation of the whole earth." — Philo JuD^us, "Life of Moses," bk. ii., ch. xii. " God also created man after his image; for as the world is the image of God, so man is the image of the worlds — Corne- lius Agrippa, "Occult Philosophy," bk. iii., p. 458. The Ark of Noah has had an absorbing attraction for most people at one time of their Hfe, but it is to be regretted that after a certain period in their career the interest gradually fades into a mere reminiscence of the nursery. How or when it happened that the ship which miraculously saved the just Noah and his family and the beasts of the earth came to be manufactured into a toy for children, is a question which it would be difficult to answer ; but it may be accepted that the Hebrew elders, who constructed the curious and ingenious parable of the flood, and all the details of the voyage and salvation of Noah, had probably other intentions than the invention of a plaything for their grandchildren. In the ages preceding the nineteenth century this seems to have been quite well understood, and the references to the Ark found in the works of early writers show that the story was received in an allegorical sense ; by the early Christians it was evidently regarded as a myth analogous to that related of the Greek Deucalion, NOAH*S ARK. 69 for in the Clementine Homilies there is a refer- ence to Noah as " Him who amongst you is called Deucalion" ("Clem, Hom./' ch. xvi.), implying that both the Patriarch and the Greek hero were fictitious personages, created to suit the variations of a similar allegory. Philo declares that the Ark was prepared in imitation of the human body, and this view is followed by Cornelius Agrippa, who says, " Seeing man is the most beautiful and perfect work of God, and His Image, and also the lesser world; therefore he by a more perfect composition, and sweet harmony, and more sublime dignity doth contain, and maintain in himself all numbers, measures, weights, motions, elements, and all other things, which are of his composition ; and in him, as it were, is the supreme workmanship. From hence all the ancients in time past did number by their fingers, and showed all numbers by them. And they seem to prove, that from the very joints of man's body all numbers, measures, proportions, and harmonies were invented ; hence according to the measure of the body they framed and contrived their temples, palaces, houses, theatres ; also their ships, engines, and every kind of artifice, and every part and member of their edifices, and buildings, as columns, chapiters, and pillars, bases, buttresses, feet of pillars, and all of this kind. Moreover God Himself taught Noah to build the Ark according to the measure of man's body, and He made the whole fabric of the world proportion- able to man's body. Therefore some who have written of the Micro- cosm, or of man, measure the body by 6 feet, a foot by 10 degrees, every degree by 5 minutes; from hence are numbered 60 degrees, which make 300 minutes, to the which are compared so many geometrical cubits by which Moses describes the 70 THE CANON. Ark ; for as the body of man is in length 300 minutes, in breadth 50, in height 30 ; so the Ark was 300 cubits long, 50 broad, and 30 high ; that the proportion of the length to the breadth be six- fold, to the height tenfold, and the proportion of the breadth to the height about two-thirds. In like manner the measures of all the members are proportionate and consonant, both to the parts of the world, and the measures of the Archetype, and so agreeing, that there is no member in man, which hath not correspondence with some sign, star, intel- ligence^ divine name^ and sometimes in God Himself the Archetype'' (" Occult Philosophy," p. 263, Engl. Trans., 1651). Lomazzo ("Art of Painting," Oxf, 1598) says the same thing, but adds, " by this rule the Grecians afterwards framed their stately Argo- navis." And Montanus (" Antiq. Judaic," plate L.) gives a diagram of the Ark ^ containing the body of Christ within it, thus indicating the stature and measure of the Saviour, Josephus (bk. i., ch. iii.), speaking of the long life of Noah (950 years) and the Patriarchs, says, that God prolonged their life, on account of the "good use they made of it in astronomical and geometrical discoveries, which would not have afforded the time of foretelling [the period of the stars], unless they had lived 600 years ; for the great year is completed in that interval." Accord- ing to the Hebrews Noah was 600 years old when the Flood commenced. This hint of Josephus, that Noah was an astronomer, suggests the conclusion, that the Ark had a cosmic significance, and what it represents is probably indicated by the following passage in the Book of Enoch: ''In those days Noah saw that the earth became inclined.'' We ^ Reproduced on p. 214. NOAH'S ARK. 7 I believe that astronomically the rectangular figure of the Ark recorded the invention of the measures of the ecliptic, mythically attributed to Noah. This conclusion is borne out by an examination of the numbers introduced into the story. According to the Hebrew chronology Noah was born in the year 1056 from the creation of the world. He built the Ark in 1656, and he died 2006, aged 950- There were canons of chronology in the ancient world, as of everything else, and the dates which appear in canonical works were presumably re- corded to exemplify the mystical facts of the numerical philosophy, along with all the other circumstances of the narrative. The numbers connected with the events of Noah's life have been evidently devised in accordance with this canonical rule, for the number 1,056, being the length of a vesica 609 ^ broad, expresses the dimensions of the Holy Oblation, the canonical figure, to which we have supposed that all the cosmic measures of the Scriptures are referred back. Then, 1,656 records the altitude of the sun's course measured upon a terrestrial globe. For every "degree of latitude on any meridian is about 69 miles everywhere, that is, 69*4 in high latitudes, and 68'8 near the equator" (Denison's '* Astronomy," p. 9) ; and Vitruvius calculated in his time that the ecliptic was inclined to the equator at an angle of 24 degrees, therefore the distance of the tropics from the equator measured on the earth's circumference would be (69 x 24 = ) 1,656 British miles. Supposing the ancients to have discovered the true proportions of the sun's path in the ecliptic, and seeking to publish the ^ The circumference of a circle 1 94 in diameter is 609, and 194 is the width of the Holy Oblation if the sun's distance be taken at 10. 72 THE CANON. fact according to their mystical custom, they would look for a symbol whose shape would agree with the space they had measured in the heavens. A city would obviously be unsuitable for the purpose. A temple would hardly meet the case, so they not unnaturally hit upon the form of a ship as a means of expressing the measures of their discovery, and proceeded to devise a myth which would at once explain and conceal the facts. The story of Noah is the Hebrew version of a mythos, which was universal in antiquity, having been probably invented by the Eygptians. Faber, one of the last of the old school of mythologists, says, '* not content with making the sun sail over the ocean in a ship, they considered the whole solar system as one large vessel ; in which the seven planets act as sailors, while the sun as the fountain of ethereal light presides as pilot or captain. These eight celestial mariners, who navigate the ship of the sphere, are clearly the astronomical repre- sentatives of the eight great gods of Egypt '* (" Origin of the Pag. Idol," bk. iv., p. 218). The ancients, however, counted only seven planets, including the sun, so that the pilot must really be the personification of the eighth sphere or zodiac, who is here called Noah by the Hebrews, while the seven members of his family, saved with him, correspond to the seven planets. The numerical value of the name applied to a ship by the Greeks gives it a cosmic meaning. For the word NATS yields the number 651, the diameter of a circle whose circumference is 2,046, the diameter of Saturn's orbit. By Gematria, it is equivalent to Plato's favourite word, 'EniSTHMH, science, and TEAETAI, mystic rites. It is prob- ably for this reason that the Church was called a ship (Nao^ and Navis), since the temple was designed as an image of the universe. Again, NOAHS ARK. 73 'H NATS has the value of 659, or ^^ of the earth's ' zz 659^1 The observations of Theophilus Gale are always instructive ; in a passage on the building of the Ark, he says, " We need no way doubt, but that Noah had been fully instructed by Church-Tra dition from his godly predecessors Methuselah, Enoch, and Seth, touching the creation of the world by God, and particularly touching the excellent fabric of the heavens, the nature of the celestial bodies, their harmonious order and motion ; that the sun was made to govern by day, and the moon by night. . . . And it is the opinion of some (which is not without probable grounds), that the whole story of the creation, written by Moses, was conveyed down even from Adam to his time, by a constant uninterrupted tradition, to the holy seed and Church in all ages. . . . That the people of God were, in the infant state of the Church, much ravished with holy contemplations of the glory of God, that shone so brightly in those celestial bodies, their order, government, motion, and influence is evident in many philosophic, yet gracious medita- tions, we have to this purpose in the psalms." The measures of the Ark, as recorded in Genesis, are 300 cubits in length, 50 cubits in breadth, and 30 cubits in height, or when rendered in feet, 450 x 75 x 45 feet. Its proportion was therefore that of a long narrow box, roughly agree- ing with the measures of a man's body, and very much like a coffin, as the figure of Montanus shows. At one end there was a small window of the size of a cubit. But there seems to have been a doubt among the Rabbis whether the word translated ** window " really was a window. The word in the Hebrew means " brightness," or " splendour," and it was said to have been a 74 THE CANON. precious stone, brought from the river Pison in Paradise. Altogether it may be said that both as regards size and ventilation, the Ark was decidedly- deficient for its ostensible purpose, and quite un- like the comfortable-looking house-boat with which we are familiar in the nursery. The Vesica, by its intersecting circles, formed a geometrical representation of the crossing of the two circles of the ecliptic and equator, and perhaps by the aid of this figure we may arrive at the reason for the choice of 300 cubits, as the length of the Ark. For a vesica whose width is 300'48 is 520'84 long, and 520*84 is the side of a rhombus having a perimeter of 2,083^ — the length of a side of the Holy Oblation; and 2,083-J being the mean number between 2,092 and 2,075, which is -^2 ^f the earth's circumference in miles, the 300 cubits may be taken to give the length of the sun's orbit, measured on a terrestrial globe. Assuming that our English word Ark (called in Hebrew Thebah, by the Seventy xijSwto? in the Vulgate, Area) preserves the meaning of the Greek word appall and apyw, it would mean that which was at the beginning, the first original pattern or rule of things. That by which the a/5X*T£XTwi/ worked, and the rule of the i^x^^m, the High Priest, or Arckhishop, It would be a canonical measure of the universe and the Creator ; exhibiting, by the proportions of the human body, the numbers and measures of time and space. For the sun in his journey measures a definite space in the heavens, and a recurrent period of time. The following geometrical process will illustrate the agreement between proportions of the Ark, and the measures of the ecliptic. If a rectangle, having a ratio of 6 to i, be drawn, so that its length is equal to the sun's course, as delineated upon a terrestrial globe, the length of the Ark would NOAHS ARK. 75 w \(S-' be equal to the circumference of the earth, and the line drawn through its centre would represent the equator. And if the oblique course of the sun be described by two straight lines, cutting the equator, so as to produce the exact declination of the sun*s orbit, it will be found that the rectangle contains a repre- sentation of the solar path, leaving a sufficient margin all round to provide a wall. The sun s course is thus inclosed inside a long narrow coffer, and appears in the form of a bridge or pediment, marking the tropics by the sol- stitial signs of Cancer and Capri- corn, at its apex and base — the equinoctial points being marked on the equator by Aries and Libra. When the rest of the signs are drawn at their proper intervals, it is quite an allowable figure of speech to say, that the Ark con- tains all the beasts of the earth. The equatorial circumference of the earth is 24,900 miles, therefore an ark enclosing the sun's course, taking the obliquity of the ecliptic at 24°, as computed by Vitruvius, measures externally 2 4, 900 by 4,150 miles. Internally it is 24,048 by 3,223. If these measures be divided by 12, as in the case of the Holy Oblation, they become, for the exterior 2,075 ^ 345^ ^^id for the interior 2,004 x 2681^2. Now if such an Ark be drawn upon the Holy Oblation, so that it is crossed by the orbits of the ^ // FIG. 13. — NOAH'S ARK. 76 THE CANON. seven planets, then, when Noah's body is intro- duced according to the diagram of Montanus, it is easy to understand how the facts of this geonietrical figure might be mystically converted into the story of Noah, and the seven members of his family, who took a year's voyage in the Ark, together with all the animals of the world. If this explanation be correct, we must conceive, by the proportions of the Ark, the vast figure of a man, in the likeness and image of God, whose body contains the measure of the sun's path in the ecliptic, the circuit of the earth, and the orbits of the seven planets. We are, in fact, to imagine the whole material universe, accurately epitomized in a human body, symbolizing the Creator reflected in creation. That the human body was used as a means of illustrating the parts of the universe, is evident from the figures surrounded by the 1 2 signs, depicted on old almanacks, and by the custom of astrologers, who allocate the signs and planets to the various members of the body. The length of the sun's orbit amounts to about 690 of its own diameters (220 x 3^ =1 691), and an ark, or rectangular box, as previously described, whose length outside is 690, measures internally 666. The notorious allusion to this number in the Apocalypse is as follows : *' Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast ; for it is the number of a, man ; and his number is six hundred, three score, and six." It is possible that the wisdom mys- teriously referred to by St. John, may have re- ference to the sun's boat, which accurately measured the extent of his course in the heavens. It is generally admitted that the revealed wisdom of the Apocalypse is concerned with astronomy, and that the vision of St. John was a sight of heaven, sucTi as astronomers see, but set forth in the mystical language of prophecy. Victorinus, who was Bishop of Petau at the end of the third century, in a treatise on the Revelation, alluding to the number 666, speaks thus : " As they have reckoned from the Greek characters, as they find it among many to be teitan, for Teitan (666) has this number, which the Gentiles call Sol and Phoebus." This statement of the bishop ex- plicitly connects the number 666 with the sun, and the statement in the text, that '' it i^ the number of a man," further associates it with the Ark of the sun, which contained the figure of the Microcosm. In some early manuscripts of the Apocalypse the number 6i6 is substituted for 666. And 6i6 is the perimeter of a square, enclosed by the sun's orbit, so that both numbers record the same mea- sure in a different way. When Eratosthenes took his observations for determining the circumference of the earth, he is said to have been informed that when a pit was dug at Syene in Egypt, the sun's rays at the summer solstice shone perpendicularly into it. This place was consequently considered by the Greeks to mark the northern tropic. Can it be a purely accidental coincidence, that the Greeks should have called the place which measured the sun's course in the ecliptic by a name which has the value of 666 ? Assuming that it was the custom to give names an appro- priate number, and that it was known that the sun's orbit was contained in an ark whose internal length was 666 of its own diameters, it must be admitted that Syene, 666, was a very fitting name for a place which indicated the boundary of the sun's path. Similarly, the length of an ark of the sun, which is measured by the tone, or interval between the earth and the moon, is 2,406 long (766 x 3' 14 16 78 THE CANON. zr 2,406) and 401 broad. Its internal length is 2,318, and its width is 311. According to St. Clement, '* there are some who say that 300 cubits [Tau, 300] are the symbol of the Lords sign" (" MisceL," bk. vi., ch. ix). Now every scholar knows that the letter Tau,^ or cross, was the emblem of the Phallus. And the word SHMEION (sign), used here, yields the number 383, or the radius of the sun's orbit measured by the tone. In classical Greek 2HMEION was written SHMA, 249, and 249 and a fraction multiplied by g^-, in accordance with the proportion of Cesariano's figure, produces the number 2,368, the numerical value of the name Jesus Christ, who was a personification of the Logos or Microcosm, The reason why the ark was considered to symbolize the generative power in the universe may be thus explained. The diameter of the sun's orbit being about 216 times its own diameter, and the diameter of Saturn*s orbit being 2,046 of these diameters, the two orbits roughly stand to each other in the ratio of g^ to i (216 X 9^ zr 2,052). The sun is thus identified with the creative principle of the universe on account of a geometric ratio, as well as for the more obvious qualities which mark him as the fertilizing or impregnating power of the earth. The width of an ark 216 long is 36 broad, and Philo (vol. iv., p. 453, Yonge's Transl.) says: *' It was by the employment of this number [36] that the Creator of the universe made the world ;" now the sum of the numbers from i to 36 is 666, the internal length of the sun's boat. Cornelius Agrippa perceived a parallel between the ark of Noah and the ship Argo. According to the Greek legend, the ship of the Argonauts ^ In Hebrew the word ThBH 407 (Ark) is equivalent by Gematria to ThV 406 (Tau). jnuah s akk. yy was built by 'APros, 374. Supposing the number 374 to represent the length of an ark of the ratio of 6 to I, its width would be 62, and 62^ x 9|- zr 592, by which we get the size of a man inclosed within a square having a perimeter of 2,368 (592 X 4 zz 2,368). And 62 squared, if we increase the fraction, gives the number 3,956, the number of miles in the earth's radius. The name 'APrxi yields 904, which is the circumference of the two circles which produce a vesica 249J long, and 249i X 9i = 2,368. Deucalion, the name of the Greek Noah, has the numerical value of 1,320, which is the length of an ark 220 wide, and 220 is the diameter of the suns orbit. And a cross drawn within a vesica 1,321 long, measures 2,083, ^he length of a side of the Holy Oblation. His ark was called AAPNAH, 242 ; if colel be deducted the number becomes 241, which is the width of an ark 1,446 long, and 1,446 is side of a square inscribed within the orbit of Saturn ; therefore the vessel of Deucalion may be conceived as signifying the body of a man surrounded by the seventh and outermost sphere of the planets. In the early writings of the Church, Noah, by his voyage in the Ark, and Christos, by His death on the Cross, fulfilled the same mystic sacrifice for the salvation of the human race, and their respect- ive symbols in each case represented the creative agent, whose function is to transmit the divine essence, which they supposed was received through the sun's rays, animated by the spirit of life, flow- ing round the universe in the milky way. The diagram of the Ark given by Montanus shows the body of Christ laid in it. Now the numerical value of the Hebrew name Messiah is 358. If we take the number 358I- to be the side of an ark, then its length will be 2,151 (358I- x 6), 8o THE CANON. the number of years occupied by the sun in each of the 12 signs of the Zodiac, during the cycle of the procession of the equinoxes, or the great year. And this space of time constitutes the great month or Messianic period. In a series of thirteenth century designs in the South Kensington Museum painted on ivory, there is a measure of Christ's body among other emblems of the passion. It is in the form of an oblong enclosure resembling the Ark. The proportions of the Ark being accepted as the measures of a human body, the following application of them to the body of truth as re- vealed to Marcus the Gnostic, may explain the meaning of an otherwise incomprehensible passage. The description is recorded by Hippolytus (Ref., bk. vi., ch. xxxix.). "The Tetrad, after having explained these things, spoke as follows : ' Now I wish also to exhibit to you Truth herself, for I have brought her down from the mansions above, in order that yoii may behold her naked, and became acquainted with her Beauty ; nay, also that you may hear her speak, and may marvel at her wisdom. Observe then first the head above, "AXipa and X2 ; the neck, B and T ; shoulders, along with hands, F and X ; breasts, AeXra and ^ ; diaphragm, ET ; belly, Z and T ; pudenda 'Hra and S ; thighs, and P ; knees, in ; calves, KO ; ankles, AH ; feet M and N.' . . . And he styles this element Man, and affirms it to be the source of every word, and the originating principle of every sound." The num- bers of all these letters, when added together, amount to 6,i66. And if we suppose this to be the length of the body of Truth, according to the proportions of the Ark, the width would be 1,027 ( -^ — 1= 1,027 1 a number, which is at the same time the radius of Saturn*s orbit, and the length of a i^vj-firi o .n.x\.iv. rhombus (1,027 : 592) which has a perimeter of 2,368. The height of this Ark is 616, which is the perimeter of a square inscribed within the sun's orbit. The numerical value of the name 'AAH0EIA, Truth, is 64, and the sum of the numbers from i to 64 is 2,080, the side of the Holy Oblation, There- fore to the Greeks Truth meant the whole cosmic system, accurately and truly delineated. This idea seems also to have been transferred to the Christian Virgin, for MAPIAM has the value of 192, which is the width of the two intersecting circles, which form a vesica 64 wide. And it was also the doctrine of the Gnostic Marcus, that the soul of the visible universe con- sisted of seven powers, which glorify the Logos by uttering seven notes. *' The first heaven sounds "AA^ot, and the one after that E, and the third "^HTa, and the fourth, even that in the midst of the seven, the power of 'Iwra, and the fifth O, and the sixth T, and the seventh and fourth from the central one, n. And all the powers, when they are connected to- gether in one, emit a sound and glorify that being from whom they have been projected" (" Ref " bk. vi., ch. xliii). It is noticeable, that in the text of Hippolytus some of the letters are written in full, while others are written with a single letter only. When these are added together, as they stand, they amount to 3,227, which is the length of an Ark having a width of 538, which is the side of a rhombus whose perimeter is 2,151, the number of years in the great month. And 3,223 is the width of an Ark containing the sun's course measured on a terrestrial globe. CHAPTER V. NAMES OF THE GODS. ^^ Pythagoras thought^ that he, who gave things their na^nes, ought to be regarded not only the most intelligent^ but the oldest of the wise meii. We must then search the Scriptures accurately^ since they are admitted to be expressed in parables^ and from the names hunt out the thoughts which the Holy Spirit^ propounding respecting things^ teaches by imprinting His mind, so to speak, on the expressions; that the names tised with various meanings, being made the subject of accurate investigation, may be explained, and that which is hidden under many integuments may, being handled and lea?'ned, come to light and gleam forth. For so also lead turns white as you rub it, white lead being produced from black. So also knowledge {gnosis), shedding its light and brightness on things, shows itself to be in truth the divine wisdom, the pure light, which illumines the men whose eyeball is clear, unto the sure vision and comprehension of truth T — "Selections from the Prophetic Scriptures," xxxii., "Ante-Nicene Library," vol. xxiv., p. 127. '•''The Names declare the glory of Al ; a?id the firmament showeth his handiwork.''^ — Psalm xix. i. With respect to the early history of the world, we are at present in the hands of a school of teachers whose attention is divided between the deductions of science and the traditions of antiquity ; and since there is much doubt about the primitive con- dition of man, so there is no certainty about the origin of language. Amongst the nations of Christendom, the *' traditions " generally affirm that the Elohim spoke in the Hebrew tongue, and taught the letters of that language to Adam, who was the first, and, owing to his nearness to divine inspiration, the most perfect philologist. Theo- NAMES OF THE GODS. 83 philus Gale admirably expresses the ancient view in his *' Court of the Gentiles" (vol. ii., p. 6): " The first created divine institutor of all philo- sophie was Adam, who without all peradventure was the greatest among all mere mortals that ever the world possessed ; concerning whom the Scrip- ture tells us (Gen. ii. 19, 20), that "he gave names to every ' living thing/ ^ which argues his great sagacity and philosophic penetration into their natures ... for Adam could, by his profound philosophy, anatomize and exactly prie into the very nature of things, and then contemplate those glorious ideas, and characters of created light and order, which Divine Wisdom had impressed thereon. And that Plato had received some broken tradition, touching this philosoph)?- of Adam, is evident from what he lays down in his '' Politicus," and elsewhere, touching the golden age or the state of innocence, wherein he says our first parent was the greatest philosopher that ever was. And Baleus (' De Script. Brit. Cent. X.,' Praefat.) tells us, * That from Adam all good arts and human wisdom flow, as from their fountain. He was the first that discovered the motions of the celestial bodies, the nature of plants, of living, and all other creatures ; he first pub- lished the forms of Ecclesiastick Politic, ceco- nomick government. . . . From whose school proceeded whatever good arts and wisdom were afterwards propagated by our Fathers unto Man- ^ This is also repeated in the Koran (ch. ii.) God "taught Adam the names of all things, and then proposed them to the angels, and said, Declare unto me the names of these things if ye say truth. They answered, Praise be unto thee, we have no knowledge but what thou teachest us, for thou art knowing and wise. God said, O Adam, tell them their names. And when he had told them their names, God said, Did I not tell you that I know the secrets of heaven and earth, and know all that which ye discover and that which ye conceal ? " 84 THE CANON. kind. So that whatever Astronomie, Geometrie, and other Arts contain in them, he knew the whole thereof! " The Hebrew letters were carefully transmitted by him to posterity, and religiously preserved, till after the addition of new languages at the fall of the Tower of Babel. On the other hand, if we turn to the legend of science, we learn a totally different account of the creation of the world. The affair, we are told, took place at a time incredibly remote, and in a manner both vague and uncertain. The very name of the Elohim, who created and instructed our father Adam, is not even mentioned. For the primitive man, according to science, was not born of great stature, nor endowed with pre- eminent faculties, which made him at once fit to receive a profound and abstruse philosophy from the mouth of a paternal God. Instead of which, he was merely an animal who had risen from very small beginnings, and had gradually improved himself, as his opportunities permitted, till, pro- bably to his own surprise, he discovered that he was a man. And then, still retaining his old faculty of getting from worse to better, he ulti- mately learned to speak, to write, and to practise all other arts. This history, as far as it goes, is plausible and probable enough, but it lacks the fulness, which is the strong point about the tradi- tions. There everything is specific and defined ; the story is complete ; the very generations from the creation of the world are counted and the years recorded ; while science, on all these highly interesting points, has nothing but a few guesses to offer. The traditions, when received according to the letter, are crude, childish, and unquestionably fabulous ; but since science has so little to tell us, we are compelled to fall back upon them, and JNAMiib UJ:- iJrlJl UUJJb. O^ make the most of their information. In fact, it must be admitted that authoritative knowledge of the archaic history of man does not exist. All that is known of human affairs is confined to a late and recent period. This will be most apparent when it is remembered how little has been ascer- tained about the Egyptians, who lived only a few thousand years before our own time, and who re- present the culmination of a vastly remote civiliza- tion, of which we know little or nothing. Indeed, such is the scantiness of our knowledge of still more recent times, that it cannot now with certainty be ascertained whether Plato or Moses is the older writer/ Although the scientist is justified in disregard- ing the traditions when these are offered as literal facts, he is nevertheless himself quite as much at fault in his attitude towards them as the serious people, who have brought discredit upon all ancient history. For his misconception as to the value of the traditions is due to his entire ignor- ance of their meaning, and since this ignorance has come about through the neglect of those critical methods formerly in use among the old inter- preters, if we are to understand the ancients at all, it is clear that we must return to the old manner of criticism. The absence, at the present day, of an illuminated class, and the consequent lapse of the old traditional knowledge, has left us without the guidance which was required for the explanation of the mystical compositions of the old poets and law-givers. Therefore, our only course must be ^ According to Josephus, Apion thought that Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt in the seventh Olympiad (749 B.C.), but this date is uncorroborated, and agrees with no other account. The LXX. declare that he lived a.m. 3839, while the Hebrews put the year of the exodus at a.m. 2423. None of these dates, however, can be supported by any evidence whatsoever. 86 THE CANON. to try and recover that knowledge which could transform an apparently stupid fable into the state- ment of some intelligible, and, more or less, im- portant fact. The oldest treatise upon names which has come down to us from antiquity is Plato's " Kratylos." This dialogue was written to illustrate the origin of words, and to account for the reasons and motives which influenced the ancients in imposing their names upon gods and things, and it conse- quently affords us the most reliable information available as to the views of the Greek philosophers upon this subject. But we are at once confronted with the difficulty as to how this treatise is to be interpreted. Mr. Jowett, for instance, says: *'I am not one of those who believe Plato to have been a mystic, or have had hidden meanings ; '* and, again : " Plato was not a mystic, nor in any way affected by the eastern influences which after- wards overspread the Alexandrian world . . . but one who aspired only to see reasoned truth, and whose thoughts are clearly expressed in his lan- guage." If Mr. Jowett's emphatic opinion could only settle the difficulty, we should have no further trouble in the matter, but unfortunately this opinion, so far as we know, is unsupported by the testimony of a single ancient author ; at any rate it would be easy to bring forward innumerable assertions to the contrary, which are quite as credible as any state- ment of Mr. Jowett's. The Neo-Platonists claimed to have had a secret tradition, which had been re- ceived from Plato himself, and handed down by the successive members of the school ; and by this knowledge they professed to interpret the works of the Master. According to St. Clement of Alex- andria, " It was not only the Pythagoreans, and Plato, that concealed many things, but the Epi- cureans, too, say that they have things which may NAMES OF THE GODS. 5/ not be uttered, and do not allow all to peruse those writings. The Stoics also say, that by the first Zeno things were written which they do not readily allow disciples to read, without their first giving proof whether or not they are genuine philo- sophers. And the disciples of Aristotle say, that some of their teachings are esoteric and others common and exoteric. Further, those who in- stituted the mysteries, being philosophers, buried their doctrines in myths, so as not to be obvious to all." It is evident, therefore, if St. Clement was not mistaken, that all the Greek philosophers expressed their doctrines mystically. And it must be remembered that the Greeks, amongst whom St. Clement lived at Alexandria, were the sons and grandsons of the men who had learned their philosophy in the schools at Athens, and there is no reason to suppose that the mere change of locality brought about such an entire change in the method of philosophizing as Mr. Jowett would have us believe. Admitting that about this time the influence of what remained of the ancient Egyptian wisdom was affecting the current of thought, it is still ridiculous to suggest that the allegorical and mystical method had not been practised by the old philosophers in Greece. Besides, the Alexandrian Greeks were only going back to the fountain-head of all their original speculations ; for, according to the evidence of their own historians, their entire theology and philosophy was first learned among the Egyptians. All the Christian Fathers declared for the sym- bolical, and not the literal interpretation of ancient philosophy, which they regarded in the light of their own Scriptures. They believed that Plato had had access to the Hebrew law, and had based his philosophy upon it. This view was held by all Christians, down to the nineteenth century. St. 88 THE CANON, Clement quotes Aristobulus to that effect: "And Plato followed the Laws given to us, and had manifestly studied all that is said in them." And Numenius, the Pythagorean philosopher, expressly writes : " For what is Plato, but Moses speaking in Attic Greek?" This latter statement, that Plato had borrowed his ideas from the Hebrew Scriptures, may have been a mere fiction, invented by the fathers to give greater authority to the new Gospel. But whether they really believed it or not, there is no doubt that all educated Christians, down to within quite recent times, recognized the identity of the Greek and Hebrew philosophy, and throughout the Middle Ages even went so far as to make the works of Plato and Aristotle the text- books of theology. Now, making every possible allowance for delusion and stupidity on the part of the Fathers, is it likely that, living as they did in the midst of the Pagan world, with the oppor- tunity of being instructed by the Sophists, and even being initiated into the Eleusinian mysteries, as St. Clement was, they could have made a mis- take, which involves the misunderstanding of every philosophical and theological system that had ever been propounded ? No doubt the Christian Fathers were not the most skilful of philosophers, but neither can we regard them as being the hope- less imbeciles which we should be compelled to do if we are to believe Mr. Jowett. And it must not be forgotten, that skilful or otherwise, these Chris- tian philosophers were skilful enough to prevail against all their rivals, and establish their system as the permanent creed of subsequent ages. Having chosen to follow the united voice of the ancients as to the mystical nature of the Platonic philosophy, it now remains to show what mys- terious facts may be elicited from the discussion about names in the Kratylos. NAMES OF THE GODS. ^g The bulk of the argument is put into the mouth of Socrates, who undertakes to instruct the others, as to the derivation of the various words. He speaks throughout in a distinctly flippant tone, and as usual, need not to be taken too seriously. There are the inevitable allusions to the geometrical mysteries, and apparently the aim of the whole piece is directed to play upon the numerical values of the different words, without arousing the sus- picion of the uninstructed. The opening paragraph has been numbered by Stephanus 383, and it begins by Hermogenes say- ing, *' Our friend Kratylos [1,12 1 J has been arguing about names ; he says . . . that there is a truth or correctness in them, which is the same for Hellenes as for Barbarians. Whereupon I asked him, whether his own name of Kratylos is a true name or not, and he answers * Yes.' And Socrates [1,629] ' Yes.' Then every man's name, as I tell him, is that which he is called. To this he replies — * If all the world were to call you Hermogenes, that would not be your name.' And when I am anxious to have a further explanation, he is ironical and mysterious, and seems to imply that he has a notion of his own about the matter, if he would only tell, and could entirely convince me if he chose to be intelligible^ "Socrates replies *Son of Hipponicus, there is an ancient saying, that ' Hard is the knowledge of the Good.' And the knowledge of names is a great part of knowledge/ " ^ The Sophists appear to have been the Pagan gnostics or cabalists, as Plato explains : " Soc. And what is the nature of this truth or correctness of names ? That, if you care to know, is the next question. Her. Certainly I care to know. Soc. Then reflect. Her. How shall I reflect ? Soc. The true way is to have the assistance of those who know, and you must pay them well, both in money and thanks — these are the Sophists." -^Kratylos. 90 THE CANON. Thus at the very outset, there is more than a hint given us, that Kratylos knew more than he was willing to reveal on this subject, and the state- ment of Socrates, that knowledge is greatly con- cerned with names, may be taken mystically, for since the word onoma, a name, yields 231, and TO ONOMA, the name, is numerically equivalent to 601,^ he means, that those who know all that is contained in that number have a great part of knowledge, and further, when the opinions of Plato are examined, they will be found to be entirely consistent with the supposition that the Greeks were in the habit of regarding names as numbers, and connecting these with the measures of the universe, and the cabalistic or traditional order of the Canon. We are told, that "the first imposers of names were philosophers," and legis- lators. By legislators, we suppose he means the men who formulated the Law, as the Jews use the expression, when applied to the five books of Moses, which constitute the exposition of the rule or Canon. And it is said, " Naming is an art, and has artificers ; " and again, " he who by syllables and letters imitates the nature of things, if he gives all that is appropriate, will produce a good image, or in other words, a name." At another time Socrates is made to say, '* By the dog of Egypt, I have not a bad notion, which came into my head only this moment ; I believe that the primaeval givers of names were undoubtedly like too many of our modern philosophers, who in the search after the nature of things are always getting dizzy, from constantly going round and round, and ^ The number 601 is the width of a vesica 1,04 1| long, or the radius of the circle of the zodiac contained in the Holy Oblation, and is equivalent by Gematria to cosmos, 600. In Hebrew ShMIM (names) is synonymous with, and is generally translated, Heavens, in the Authorized Version of the Scriptures. NAMES OF THE GODS. 9 1 then they imagine, that the world is going- round and round, and moving in all directions ; and this ap- pearance, which arises out of their own internal con- dition, they suppose to be a reality of nature ; they think there is nothing stable or permanent, but only flux and motion, and that the world is always full of every sort of motions and change. The consideration of the names I mentioned has led me into making this reflection. . . . Perhaps you did not observe, that in the names, which have been just cited, the motion, or flux, or generation of things is most assurely indicated." The above passage may reasonably be taken to mean, that the names referred to, in setting forth the three laws of the universe, " motion, flux, and generation " are symbols of the powers of creation and the world. Again, he says, *' A name rightly imposed ought to have the proper letters. And the proper letters are those which are like the things." In another place, in reply to a statement of Kratylos, that a name wrongly spelt is not a name at all, he says, " I believe what you say may be true about num- bers, which must be just what they are, or not be at all." This last sentence is the only open sug- gestion, in the whole dialogue, that names have a numerical value. But in the following passage, we are able to put this supposed allusion to numbers to the test, and discover Plato's method of dis- closing his numerical philosophy. " Soc, No more could names ever resemble any actually existing thing, unless the original elements of which they are compounded bore some degree of resemblance to the objects of which the names are an imitation ; and the original elements are letters. . . . Were we not saying, that all things are in motion, and progress, and flux, and that this idea of motion is expressed by names ? Do 92 THE CANON. you not conceive that to be the meaning of them ? " Kratylos, Yes, that is assuredly their mean- ing, and their true meaning. '' Soc. Let us revert to 'EniSTHMH [651 J (knowledge), and observe how ambiguous the word is, seeming rather to signify stopping the soul at things, than going round with them ; and therefore we should leave the beginning as at present, and not reject the E, but make an insertion of an I instead of an E (not 7nc>i, and the introduction of so many other words, which pro- duce numbers representing important measures of the heavenly bodies, and their orbits may very reasonably justify the conclusion, that here, as in so many other places, there is an allusion to the scheme of the universe, and that, in the discussion 3f the origin of words, there is a mystical reference to their use, as symbols of the cosmic system, by means of their numerical value. The arguments as they stand are not convincing, and it is not likely that Plato would have written such a work as the ** Kratylos," if it is to be taken unequivocally, as Mr. Jowett imagined, and without mystery of any kind. Neither Plato nor the Hebrew philo- sophers who declare that Adam was taught the Hebrew tongue that he might converse with God in Paradise, wrote those things, as we nowadays write a philological work, but both seem to have thought their story good enough for any one who knew no better than to believe it. Clement of Alexandria, whose testimony has been already quoted, is said to have died a.d. 220, so that he lived about five hundred years after Plato. He was the first considerable writer of the Christian School, which was the final develop- ment of the philosophic eclecticism of the Greeks, and his opinions may be supposed to accurately reflect the prevailing views of the later theologists. He, along with the other Fathers, refers to the signification of names, and treats the subject exactly as Plato did. But while Plato was satis- fied to indicate the measures of the universe simply as the thing to be known ('ErilZTHMH, 65 1), the Christians intimated that the science of Nature was to be reached through the knowledge of the Cross, for 'H rNXlXIS and STATPOi; have the same numerical value. Gregory Thaumaturgus, Bishop of Neo-Csesa- reia, an early Christian writer, called a near suc- cessor of the Apostles, speaking of the quality of names, ingeniously introduces a series of mystical numbers by means of certain words in his dis- course upon the Trinity. " I see," he says, " in 96 THE CANON. all, three essentials — substance, genus, name. . . . We speak of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; these, however, are not names, which have only super- vened at some after period, but they are sub- stances. Again, the denomination Man is not in actual fact a denomination, but a substance com- mon to men, and is the denomination common to all men. Moreover, names such as these — 'ASd.^ [46], 'A|3paa> [145], 'l(ro,dy. [232], 'W^^ [833]? these I say are names. But the Divine Persons are names indeed, and the names are still the Persons ; and the Persons then signify that which is and subsists, which is the essence of God. . . . The vocable word (logos) belongs to these three genera of words, which are named in Scripture, and which are not substantial, namely, the word conceived ('ENNOIAN, 236), the word uttered (nPO- ^OPIKON, 1,080), and the word articulated ('AP@PI- KON, 360)." The names of the Patriarchs we shall speak of elsewhere, so it is only necessary to draw attention to the three words emphasized at the end of the paragraph. The first number, 236, is the length of the side of the New Jerusalem. The second number is 1,080, which is the number of miles in the moon's radius. The third number, 360, is both the degrees in the circumference of the earth, and the number of days in the Greek year. Origen also testifies as to the mysterious pro- perties of names. He begins with a quotation from Celsus in these words : — " Those herdsmen and shepherds who followed Moses as their leader had their minds deluded by vulgar deceits, and so supposed that there was one God, named either the Highest, or Adonai, or the Heavenly, or Sabaoth, or called by some other of those names, ^ Adam, Abraham, Isaak, Jacob. jr* x^iYxiiij Kjr ixiJCf vxwJJO. y/ which they delight to give this world ; and they knew nothing beyond that ! And in a subse- quent part of his work he says that * it makes no difference whether the God who is over all things be called by the name Zeus, which is current among the Greeks, or by that, ^.^., which is in use among the Indians or Egyptians/ Now, in answer to this, we have to remark, that this involves a deep and mysterious subject^ that, viz., respecting the nature of names ; it being a question whether, as Aristotle thinks, names were bestowed by arrangement, or, as the Stoics hold, by nature. . . , If, then, we shall be able to establish, in reference to the preceding statement, the nature of powerful names, some of which are used by the learned among the Egyptians, or by the Magi among the Persians, and by the Indian philosophers, called Brahmans, or by the Samanseans, and others in different countries ; and shall be able to make out that the so-called magic is not, as the followers of Epicurus and Aristotle suppose, an altogether certain thing, but is, as those skilled in it prove, a consistent system, having words which are known to exceedingly few. Then, we say that the name Sabaoth, and Adonai, and the other names treated with so much reverence among the Hebrews, are not applicable to any ordinary created things, but belong to a secret theology which refers to the Framer of all things" ("Against Celsus," bk. i., ch. xxiv.). That the reader may follow the next section with a clear mind, we now quote the exposition of the Christian faith, defined with such perfect lucidity by St. Athanasius : " And the Catholic faith is this : that we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity ; neither confounding the perspns, nor dividing the substance. For there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, H 98 THE CANON. and another of the Holy Ghost. But the god- head of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost is all one ; the glory equal, the majesty co- eternal. Such as the Father is, such is the Son : and such is the Holy Ghost." These being the opinions of the Fathers, we are, at any rate, safe in judging their writings by what Mr. Jowett calls "oriental ideas," for the Gospel appears to have emanated directly from the Alexandrian influences. It is, moreover, de- monstrable that the threefold unity worshipped as God by the new theologists merely exemplified afresh the conceptions of the older philosophies of Egypt and Greece finally brought together by the conquests of Alexander the Great. Before the Christian era, the Greeks had been in the habit of summing up their theology in a Triad, or Tetrad of symbolical persons, who, it appears, were always analogous to the great Triad of the Cabala. Many such combinations of names are to be found in Plato's writings. In the "Timaeus" the divine Triad is called 0fo?, Aoyo?, and fv^ri — God, the Word, and the Soul. The Christian Fathers identified these with their own Trinity, the Father, the Son, and Holy Ghost. And when the various names are reduced to numbers, it will be evident that Plato and Moses, as the Fathers declared, established their theology upon a similar cosmic basis, each deriving the divine names from the numbers which occur in the Holy Oblation, the New Jerusalem and the other canonical figures. The three names of the Platonic Triad have the following values : wAMiis OF THK GODS. gg 0EO2 284+1 Aoros 373+ ^ ^TXH 1,708 + I ©EOS . . 284 Aoros . . 373 2,365 + 3 = 2,368 657 - I = 656 ME2XIA2. It would, perhaps, be impossible to illustrate the doctrine of the Trinity more ingeniously than by those names and their corresponding numbers. For 284, representing the first person, the Father, or Macrocosm, is the diameter of a circle 8g2 in circumference, and 891 is the numerical equival- ent of 'OTPANOS, Heaven. Accordingly the num- bers deduced from those two words being each the measure of one circle, God and Heaven are pre- sented to us as one and the same — a conception admirably set forth by the rest of the numbers. Then 284 is the width of a vesica 492^ long, and this is the width of a vesica 853 long, which in its turn is the width of another i ,480 long. So the name, Theos, the god of the Pagan and Christian Greeks, expresses, in a roundabout way, the same number and the same meaning, as the name Christos, 1,480. The second and third persons, called Logos and Psyche, represent the twofold body of the Micro- cosm, and are appropriately symbolized by the number 2,083, the side of the Holy Oblation con- taining the seven planets and the sublunary world. The sum of the three numbers, when colel is added to each, is the ever- recurring 2,368, which the Christians afterwards adopted as the complete name of God, expressed by the letters 'IH20T2 XPISTOS, Jesus Christ. It is plain that the threefold deity of Plato em- lOO THE CANON. bodies in the persons of the Triad the three parts of the universe called : 'EMnTPEION 'AI0HP . . 2TOIXEIA . 760 128 1,196 2,084 'EMnTPEION 'AI0HP . . GEOI . . 2TOIXEIA . 760 128 888 284 1,196 1,480 And since the sum of these numbers is 2,084, it was unnecessary for a Greek to specify the measures of the cosmos otherwise than by re- peating the three names. According to some of the old cosmographers there was a region beyond the Empyreum. This was called by the Cabalists Ain Soph, or limitless expansion, an impossible conception usually as- cribed as an attribute of God. If, therefore, we add the word 0£o?, God, as symbolizing this in- finite region, beyond the three lower and nearer divisions, which manifest the Deity to us in a more comprehensible manner, we shall extend the uni- verse to four parts. And 284 (0£o?) added to 2,084 makes 2,368 as the numerical value of the Tetrad. Again, the sum of 760 and 128 is 888, and 1,196 + 284 zr 1,480, so that from the names of the four divisions of the universe there are produced the numbers which, as will now be shown, determined the names of the great gods of antiquity, and thus labelled them as personifications of specific parts of the cosmic system. The Christian Trinity, composed in like manner, yields the number 2,047 (when colel is deducted from each name), which is the diameter of Saturn's orbit measured by the diameter of the sun. NAMES OF THE GODS. lOI 'O HATHP .... 559 - I O 'TIOS 750-1 KAI nNETMA 'AFION 741 - I 2,050 - 3 — 2,047. In works of art the Trinity was most often re- presented by Jesus on the cross, supported by John and Mary. The three names combined thus bring out 2,151, the number of years occupied by the sun in each of the twelve signs, during the precession of the equinoxes, or great year, 'IHSOTS . . 888 'mANHS . . 1,069 + 1 K, 6. -,,6. MAPIAM . . 192 + I J ' ^ ~ ' ^ 2,149 + 2 — 2,151 and exhibit the Messiah stretched within the Holy Oblation containing the sphere of the Zodiac and seven planets. It has already been explained that the value of the name Christos, 1,480, being the side of a square inscribed within the Zodiac or fixed stars, gives the measure of his body, extended in the form of a cross throughout the whole universe. Sur- rounded thus by the twelve signs, he represents the Messiah, or periodic Divinity, connected with the cycle of the great precessional period of 25,816 years. A month of this great year is 2,151 years /25,8i6 \ , . . , , 1 I — 11: 2,151 ), and It IS supposed that the ancients accepted the particular sign, in which the sun rose at the vernal equinox, during this cycle, as the symbol of the Messiah. It is thought to be on this account that the Egyptians worshipped the black and white bulls. Apis and Mnevis, as emblems of the Deity, when the sun was in Taurus, while the Greeks probably called their I02 THE CANON. Zeus, 'AMMX2N (Ammon), and gave him the head of a ram, when the sun entered the sign Aries. For Ammon has the value of 931, and 932-10 is the length of a rhombus having a perimeter of 2,151. This heralding of a new Messiah, every month of the Great Year, had a peculiarly mystical meaning. For having conceived the universe in the likeness of a woman, they made their image or type to conform literally to the original or arche- type, and looked forward with joyful expectation to the fulfilment of time, when a new Saviour would come, and symbolically purge the sins of the world, and accomplish its renewal and regenera- tion.-^ We have seen that the twelve signs of the Zodiac, according to Villalpanda's diagram of the camp were identified with the twelve tribes of the Israelites. The twelve tribes were considered by the old theologians to prefigure the twelve apostles, who were also said to be analogous to the signs of the Zodiac. In the first century the sun had passed from the Ram to the sign of the Fishes. Now, taking the order of the apostles as it is given by St. Mark (ch. iii.), and supposing Petros, the fisherman, to correspond to 'I^Sue? (the fishes) the names of the apostles represent sequence of the signs in the new epoch, as follows : March Ram . Kpiog . 400 X TikTpOQ . . 755 April . ^ Bull . Tavpog 107 1 op 'laKOjfSog . . 1 103 May . . Twins. AiBvfiot . 538 8 'iwavrjQ . . 1069 Tune . . Crab . KapKLVog 471 n 'Avopkag . . 361 July . . Lion . Aewv . 885 © ^tKnnroQ . . 980 August . Virgin HapBsvog 515 a BapOoXofidlog 603 September Scales . XqXai. 649 n MaOQaiog, . 340 October . Scorpion 'SKop-jrioQ 750 j\. Bwfiag 1050 November Archer TlO^BVT7]Q . 1343 m. 'laKto^og . 1 103 December Goat . 'AiyoKEpuii ^ 1209 t QaSSaXog . , 299 January . Watermai \ ^Tdpoxooc, 1514 yf ^IfKOV . . . 1 100 February . Fishes. 'ixBifBQ 1224 **** »**• 'lovSag I(7Kapiw6 ' 1835 10,569 10,598 ^ Consult Mr: Massey^s "Natural Genesis" on this subject. NAMES OF THE GODS. IO3 Accordingly, when the Logos is stretched cross- wise in the Zodiacal circle, so that the Ram occupies the vernal equinox, his hands and feet, extended to the four corners of the circumference, are in the signs of the Bull, the Lion, the Scorpion, and the Waterman — the four signs which correspond to the four beasts symbolizing the evangelists. The names of the apostles analogous to these in the new cycle are, 'Ia>twj3of, ^IxtTrnog, ScofAoc?, and lifji.(i}v. The name icoi£}t,cc (twelve), so frequently applied to the disciples in the New Testament, very fitly expresses their true significance by the number 834, which is the side of a rhombus 1,446 long, or the side of the square contained in the orbit of Saturn, encircled by the twelve signs. The number deduced from the twelve pagan names of the Zodiac, is the perimeter of a rhombus 2,642 wide, which is produced by two intersecting circles with a united width of 7,926, or the number of miles in the equatorial diameter of the earth. Accordingly, the number 10,569 affords the means of correctly determining the distance of the twelve signs on a terrestrial globe. The apostles, again, belonged to the theological system of the Gospel, which presents the mythos in the third manner (St. Clement), and on that account they set forth the measure of the sublunary world, the symbol of the third person of the Triad. For the sum of the twelve names is 10,598, or the circumference of the moon's orbit divided twice by twelve (3,372 X s}= 10,597). The Greek Zodiac, therefore, may be said to denote the solar year, while the apostles of Messiah, 656, signify a lunar month, or lunar year. Moreover, by the cabalistic process of trans- position, the number 10,569 may become 10,596 + 11= 10,597 and is equal to 10,598 — i zz 10,597, I04 THE CANON. therefore the great Zodiac and the twelve disciples of Christos are analogous to one another. 'IHSOTS (Jesus) yields the number 888, which is the length of a rhombus having a perimeter of 2,046, the diameter of Saturn's orbit. And a circle, whose circumference is 888 contains the square of the New Jerusalem. The Holy Ghost, the third person of the Chris- tian Trinity, corresponds to the Bride of the Cabala, and properly personifies the sublunary world or four elements, and as the embodiment of the receptive and reproductive principle in genera- tion, she symbolized the earth, the mother of all living creatures. Now, TO HNETMA 'AFION (the Holy Ghost) has the value of 1,080, which is the number of miles in the moon's radius. She is thus also a personification of the moon, whom the ancients regarded as the wife or sister of the sun. Again, nNETMA 'AFION, without the article, yields (deducting colel from each name) 708, and a saltire drawn within a square, whose sides are 708-f, measures (1,002 x 2 nz) 2,004, the numerical value of the Greek names of the elements.^ The number 708 is also the measure of a cross whose limbs are 354 long, the number of days in the lunar year. The name was also sometimes written TO 'AnON TO nNETMA, which gives the num- ber 1,450: and, if colel be deducted from each word, the remainder is 1,446, the side of a square contained within the orbit of Saturn. By this number she is manifested as an image of the whole material universe, and corresponds to the ^^v^ii rov xoo-ju-o'j, the Soul of the World, described by Plato, The Bride, likened by St, J6hn in the Apocalypse to the Heavenly City, the new Jerusalem, is another figure of the Holy Ghost, and 710 (llv£\j[jt,oc ^ See chapter vi., p. 142. NAMES OF THE GODS- IO5 "ky^Qv) is the length of a vesica 409^ broad, and 409^ is the length of a second vesica whose breadth is 236, the length of the wall in each of the four sides of the celestial city. Robert Flood has beautifully illustrated the figure of this heavenly woman, standing in the midst of the cosmos with her feet upon the elements, and her head reaching up to the firmament (" Utriusque cosmi majoris scilicet et minoris . . . historia," 1617). There were also various other names applied to the Christian Trinity singly or collectively. The word Kupto?, Lord, for instance, has the value of 800, which is the perimeter of the New Jerusalem, within the wall (200 x 4 — 800). None of the names given to Christ was more often used than that of the Saviour and Swt??^, if colel be added to each word, yields 1,480. Jesus was said to be a Nazarite, and he is frequently called Jesus of Nazareth. Now the word Na^upar©? yields 1,239, which is the width of a vesica 2,151 long. It is evident that the numbers obtained from all these names are simple cosmic measures de- rived geometrically from the canonical figures of the Holy Oblation, the city of Ezekiel, and the New Jerusalem, identifying the Deity with the measures of the universe. To return to the " Kratylos," an analysis of the statements which are made there with reference to the names of the Greek Deities suggests, that the same mystical principle of naming the Gods existed among the Greeks. Plato says, that there was reason in the Athenians calling " the essence of all things 'E2TIA, 516." Now the numbers 5ii'5 and 520'83 are respectively the sides of rhombi whose perimeters are 2,046, the diameter of Saturn's orbit, and 2,083 '33 ^he side of the Holy Oblation. And the 5 16' 16 being the mean number between the two, may be very properly I06 THE CANON, said to represent the sphere of the fixed stars, which was supposed by the old philosophers to contain the vital essence of all existing things, and was symbolized by the Christians in the name Christos, 1,480, who was supposed to be extended crosswise within this sphere. The name'HPA, 109, he says, "may have been given, when the legislator was thinking of the heavens, and may be only a disguise of the air (drip), putting the end in place of the beginning. You will recognize the truth of this, if you repeat the letters of 'HPH, 116, several times over." Now 109 is the mean radius of the sun's orbit, its dis- tance from the earth being from 108 to no of its own diameters. 'HPH again has the value of 116. And 1 16|- is the diameter of a circle 365, the num- ber of days in a year. And when he tells us to repeat the letters several times over, he apparently means the numbers, which are the equivalents of the letters, for all the following multiples of 116 are mystical numbers. 116 x 2 n: 232, 116 x 6 = 696, 116 X 7 = 812, 116 X 8 =: 928, and 116 X 9—1,044. These numbers will be referred to, and explained further on. For the present, it is enough to say that Hera was the wife or feminine part of the androgynous Zeus, whose name we shall now proceed to examine. To use Plato's own words, " the name of Zeus has an ex- cellent meaning although hard to understand, be- cause really like a sentence which is divided into two parts ; for some call him ZHN, and use one half, and others who use the other half call him ZETS ; the two together signify the nature of the God." And he further declares, that these names are appropriate to, and symbolize **the God, through whom all creatures always have life." The numerical value of this double name is 677, that is, ZHN, 65, + ZETS, 612 3: 677, and we have NAMES OF THE GODS. lO^ been told that its meaning is "hard to understand." Nevertheless, by the help of geometry, it may be possible to discover Plato's intention. The divi- sion of the God into two is evidently intended to exhibit his androgynous nature, the double name Zen-Zeus being equivalent to the Hebrew Elohim, the twofold Deity of creation. The number 677, when colel is added and abstracted, produces the numbers 676 and 678. The first of these is the square of 26, the value of Tetragammaton, while 678 is the length of the sun's orbit (216 x 3-f — 678), the former number having a feminine and the latter a masculine significance. The four letters, which compose the name ZETS, have been supposed to be analagous to the Tetra- gammaton of the Jews, accordingly it may be received, in a geometrical sense, as an illustration of the square or rhombus. Among the Romans and Italians of the Middle Ages, Zeus was identi- fied with the planet Jupiter, and we find in the series of the planets, designed by Baldini, that Jupiter sits in his chariot on a cube, or square seat. He is also depicted thus, in the edition of Hyginus, printed at Venice in 1488. This quad- rangular form, as an attribute of Zeus, is traceable to the number 612, for a square, whose sides are ^53 (153 X 4 = 612), is just contained within the sun's orbit, so that the great God of the Greeks, by the numerical value of his name, in exemplifying the measure of the sun's course, may fitly be re- ceived as the symbol of that animating power, which flows from the sun, and gives life to all things. Apparently in imitation of this, the Chris- tians afterwards perpetuated the same conception, by similarly placing Christos in a square, within the sphere of the firmament. Such a striking geometrical parallel between the two great gods of antiquity is not likely to be an accidental cir- lo8 THE CANON. cumstance, exhibiting no community of purpose on the part of the legislators, as Plato calls them, who devised and established the Greek and Chris- tian theological systems. The number 612 was also a mystical number among the Hebrews, who, by adding colel, produced the number 61 3. There are 354 days in the lunar year, and a vesica 354 wide is 6i3"6 long; the two intersecting arcs of which it is composed measuring 741 '4 17. The diameter of the two circles is 708, and their united width is 1,062. The numbers produced from this diagram are certainly remarkable. In the first place 354 is the number of days in the lunar year, and the equivalent of Qsog ; secondly, 708 is the side of a square whose diagonals are 2,004, ^he numerical equivalent of the names of the four elements (see p. 142), and also of the Holy Ghost, nv£v/Aa 'Ayiotf ; thirdly, 741*416 is the circumference of a circle whose diameter is 236, the side of the New Jerusalem ; lastly, the circumference of the vesica is i, 482*832, or with a small reduction, 1,480. "The meaning of the name 'AIIOAAXIN, 1,061, will be moving together, whether in the poles of heaven, as they are called, or in the harmony of song, which is termed concord, because he moves altogether by an harmonious power, as astronomers and musicians ingeniously declare." By the numerical value of the name 'AttoXXwv, the Sun God appears to be the counterpart of Zeus, for a vesica 612 wide is 1,061 long; therefore each brother appears to be the complement of the other, and the sum oftheir names is (612 + 1,061 =r) 1,673 or ^ l^^s than the side of a square whose diagonal is 2,368. The name 'APTEMI2 yields 656. The moon was of course regarded as the wife as well as the sister of the sun, but in either case the two together represent the double potency in generation. The sides of a triangle whose perimeter is 656 are 2 1 8f , or the diameter of the sun's orbit. This triangle, being a symbol of the sun, or the male power of the universe, may possibly account for the worship of Artemis under the name of Orthia at Sparta. Artemis was also specially regarded as the pro- tectress of cities and streets, presumably because the geometricians found out that a rhombus whose sides are 656*85 contains a square 4i6-|, or the city of Ezekiel. Again, by Gematria, Artemis is equivalent to Messias, one of the names applied to Christos in the gospel. " The name of the Muses (Mouo-a) and Music would seem to be derived from their making philosophical inquiries (jwoVfla*), and AHTX2, 1,138, is called by this name, because she is such a gentle goddess, and so willing (iGskn{j.6v) to grant our requests ; or her name may be A>iScj, as she is often called by strangers : they seem to imply by it her amiability and her smooth and easy-going way of behaving. Artemis is named from her healthy (a/3Tfja>ij) well ordered nature, and because of her love of virginity, and perhaps because she is proficient in virtue (apsTii), Numeric- ally the names, Leto and Artemis, would seem to have a similar significance, for a rhombus 656*85 broad is 1,138*68 long, and this rhombus contains the city of Ezekiel, which may be referred to in the legend of the birth of Leto's twins on the floating island called Asteria, the starry. It is said that the island suddenly stood still, being borne up by four pillars, which possibly refer to the four orbits of Mercury inclosed within the mystical city. By Gematria Leto is equivalent to AEAOTE, iji39> the womb, and would thus appear to be the goddess who personates the cosmic mother, or the feminine essence of creation, and was wor- shipped as an embodiment of the matter of the universe. The legend of her retreat to the float- ing island of Delos, 312 (vesica 312 1540 x 4 = no THE CANON. 2, 1 60), appears to identify her with the tenth step of the Cabala, for this step is hung to the figure containing the other nine steps by a chain, or properly a canal, so it might be legitimately likened to an island. When Hermogenes asks, " What is the meaning of Dionysos and Aphrodite ? " Socrates answers, "Son of Hipponicus, you ask a solemn question; there is a serious and also a facetious explanation of both these names ; the serious explanation is not to be had from meT The mysterious explanation which Socrates declines to divulge, may possibly lie in the following geometrical problems, derived from the numbers of the names. Dionysos was spelt in two ways, AIONTSOS, 1,004, andAIXlNYDOS, 1,734. Now these two numbers are to one another in the ratio, or very nearly so, of 26 to 15, for a rhombus 1,001 wide is 1,734 long; accordingly they afford a parallel to the names Zeus and Apollo, and Leto and Artemis. The rhombus was one of the attributes of Dionysos, carried in the processions at the celebrations of his orgies ; for although his usual attribute was the phallus, he was a masculo- feminine god. It has been shown that the number 1,002 may be taken to be one of the limbs of a cross measuring 2,004, or the numerical value of the four elements, so that the name Dionysos implies that he was a personifica- tion of the Logos described in the " Timaeus," Another reason why he may be appropriately symbolized by a cross is given in the following chapter, p. 148. He was the wine-god of the Greeks, being called by Plato "giver of wine;" and 'O '0IN02 yields 470, the diameter of a circle whose circumference is 1,480. This seems to bear out the identity of this god with the Christos, recognized by the Gnostics, and his identification with the seasons of the year, and the equinoxes may iNAM.il.a KJt iirLtU UUJJO. also be attributed to the numbers of his name. By Gematria, Dionysos is equivalent to 2ABAX2, 1,004- The value of the name Aphrodite is 993, and Plato connects her with Dionysos, 1,004, possibly because 1,004 added to 994 makes 1,998, the width of the two intersecting circles, which produce a vesica 666 broad. Again 994 is the perimeter of a rhombus 248J wide, and the vesica enclosing it has a circumference of 1,041^^, or the radius of the sphere of the firmament inscribed within the Holy Oblation. As the personification of the great feminine principle of nature, she ought to be con- nected with the earth. This is expressed in the number 991, which is the side of a rhombus having a perimeter of 3,964, the radius of the earth measured in miles. But Aphrodite had also a masculine significance ; for while she was adored as the essence of all beauty, grace, and feminine fruitfulness, there was also strangely worshipped under her name a masculine power. Her image, which in her feminine aspect personated every womanly perfection, was set up in Crete and else- where in the form of a crude stake, roughly carved into the semblance of a human body, and her face disfigured with an unsightly beard. This monstrous idol may also be referred to the number 248 (see "Cabala," Greater Holy Assembly, 968). Hesiod derived the name from 'A